are foldable wagons allowed in the parks?
many single and double strollers are allowed at the theme parks, but wagons are not allowed. if your wagon doesn't fit the guidelines, you can always choose to rent a stroller at the walt disney world resort to keep your little mouseketeer rested and happy!
The Redline 2-Piece Polypropylene Trailer Vent # HMAV2-AVT2 can be installed in any convenient location on your enclosed trailer where you have or can make a 3-inch diameter hole. These vents will work best when used in multiples, with some near the ceiling and some near the floor, to allow cooler air to enter through the lower vents and hotter air to exit through the upper vents.

I recommend you use a sealant for installation, such as silicone caulk or Loctite Urethane Sealant # L0150811. You'll also need to supply 9 installation screws per vent, such as either # 31071 for sheet metal or # 30587 for wood. the block has been already removed. yes walk a few hundred feet to the bus station and you can catch one from there!
its all signed and the staff can help ask about return tickets they may be cheaper! We have had someone tell us the swivel fittings that particular hose won't fit in the 4 inch bumper of your trailer, and the manufacturer said they could grind down two of the lugs and the hose would then fit. We do have a video which I've attached of the RhinoFLEX RV Sewer Hose w Swivel Fittings, 4-in-1 Adapter, and Storage Caps - 15' Long # CAM39761 fitting in a bumper.

Since your Rhino Extreme won't fit in your trailer bumper, I have a solution that won't require grinding down your parts. I recommend the Valterra RV Sewer Hose Carrier - Adjustable - 50 1. beauford, 2. rolls royce, 3. ford mustang, 4. vw campervan please i've been to a few padres games at petco park. it's a pretty nice new ballpark, although it tries to create a feel of being a larger version of one of the old style ballparks with a brick building built into it (the western metal building was preserved and integrated into the stadium). the nosebleed seats... are pretty nosebleed, but the closer seats are pretty nice. the concessions are pretty standard, with a few san diego favorites. my favorite food is the garlic fries from gordon biersch. one nice aspect is that around the park's main walkways there are hd tvs showing the game while you're standing in line to get food, etc.

i think it's nicer than qualcomm stadium was for baseball. however, i'm still upset at some of the political manuevering that occured to get it built, using public tax money. its downtown location is great, and brings extra traffic to the bars and restaurants of the gaslamp quarter, and extra riders trying out san diego's transit options to avoid the high cost of parking downtown. seat No, since they did not write the law for you. What you need to look for is a Grandfather Clause that lets those who had it legally, get to keep it legally.   

  

Edit: No, TD, it is so the police can see the driver. Arthur C Clarke once observed that people get too optimistic about technological progress for the short run, and then too pessimistic for the long term. I think that is what has happened with this particular technology. When I was a kid, I watched the Jetsons a lot. In those days, the "future" was around 2000. That was when we were supposed to be living the Jetsons. Everyone would have their own rocket packs, with which we could zip around in, flying cars, robot maids, homes and offices in the sky that looked like the Space Needle.   

  

Ironically though, the Jetsons was not set in 2000, but in 2061. I think that's a good ballpark for when we'll have practical flying cars.   

  

If you think about it, we've had flying cars of a sort for some time now. It doesn't require any sort of special technology at the basic level. They're called helicopters. It is quite possible to build small inexpensive helicopters right now. It's not a question of technology really--it's more about regulation, licensing, safety, and infrastructure.   

  

I think driver-less technology, once it is perfected and demonstrated to be reliable in ordinary ground cars, will help clear the way for the first three objections. I imagine vehicles, approximately car sized, maybe a bit wider or taller, emerging from people's garages where the roof opens, not a door on the side. They might look hemispheric, two contra-rotating fan blades, negating the need for a tail, driven perhaps by an electric induction motor of sufficient power, similar to a Tesla. The blades and motor might be at the bottom, surrounded by a wire mesh, with a floor filled with Lithium batteries, maybe graphene batteries if someone finds a means to mass-produce that amazing material, and then the passengers on top of that, enclosed in a transparent dome, sitting on a ring of seats after they tell the car their destination.   

  

At first, they will be toys of the rich. People will be stuck in the horrible traffic on the highways, and look above longingly as the wealthy zip above them to their offices downtown. It will become a status symbol, and more and more people will buy them, and the cost will come down as manufacturers find ways to bring the costs down and mass produce more. New buildings and garages will gradually be designed to accommodate the new cars. It might be necessary for the new cars to be able to hover just a few feet off the ground so that they can enter existing garages, but eventually, as new buildings are designed and built, the garages might migrate to the tops of buildings, or perhaps a garage to the side where cars land on top, and are moved by elevator down to a parking spot.