the supreme court cleared the reservation quota for disabled in jobs and promotions. which of the following statements is/are correct in this regard:a. the reservation has been directed to be applicable to the matters of appointment, selection, direct recruitment, deputations and promotionsb. the principle of not exceeding 50% reservation is not applicable in this case.c. the supreme court has highlighted that the judgement is in line with the persons with disability act
a, b & c
hi,  

overall percentage will not be consider only aggregate percentage of pcm will be considered.  

you should have secured a minimum of 50 % marks (for general category) and at least 45 % marks (for reserved category and persons with disability candidates) belonging to maharashtra state only).  

hope it helps,thank you. given statement is true. hello dear ,

you will get admission as per ts law cet exam as your rank is upto the mark in accordance with your category. you can check the cut off for diffrent colleges by clicking on this link <https://law.careers360.com/articles/ts-lawcet-cutoff>. you can decide in which college you will get admission by going through this link.

ho[ e this would help you. maybe the person responsible for reporting your answer was offended by some of the suggestions on the page. i have several disabilities, but they are not 'defects' or 'drawbacks' or 'weaknesses' and i am certainly not an 'invalid'. these are words that probably would have been commonplace twenty years ago, but they're no longer really considered to be pc when talking about disability.

and quite why 'incompetency' is listed as a synonym for it is completely beyond me.

"physically challenged" and "differently abled" aren't technically correct for a vast number of disabilities. none of my disabilities challenge me physically in any way whatsoever.

or maybe, just maybe, they were offended that the "wiki" link was wrong. it should be wiktionary, not wikitionary. it's wikipedia's version of a dictionary, and it should rhyme with dictionary. hey [@fastwayjim](/forum/u/fastwayjim)

i could reproduce the behavior. of course this should not be the case. when you start a job first the data needed for the computation is processed before being transferred to a computation instance. if there is no instance available a new one has to be started and your job gets into… [@moncrab](/u/moncrab)

so the expression in the referenced rows property of specific\_row\_action is incorrect. it should be:

select(job dispatch[key],[\_rownumber]=2) column a answer (1) no-new company is formed. (c) absorption (2) 'goodwill or capital reserv (a) purchase method. (3) scheme of amalgamation (d) reqires approval of high court (4) transferer company (e) to be liquidated (5) profit on realisation (b) transferred to realisation a/c what does these graphs tell us? nothing. just that the proportion of races were mostly maintained. asians might have deserved 100% of the seats and yet, are kept within proportion. they might have deserved no seats and yet kept within the proportion. there is no really useful info there. the “rule of law” states that everyone, regardless of any discrimination, is equal before the law. in an independent and democratic india, all citizens from a rickshaw puller to the prime minister are to be judged equally before the law if they violate it by committing a crime. every violation of a law or commitment of a criminal offense has a specific process to establish guilt and cite its punishment. the “rule of law” ensures that equality is maintained by passing the same judgment on a criminal regardless of his/her status or background.
violations of the “rule of law” are, sadly enough, aplenty in india. in our country, if one has power or “contacts” with influential people, then it is easy to get away with even gross violations of laws and rules. for example, most politicians today own property and wealth worth crores but they do not even file tax returns on the same. the assets they declare are probably not even half of what they originally own. however, an ordinary income tax official cannot dare to question them for fear of losing his job, because the former have “power” that this official does not possess. the answer to the concerned question has been extensively
covered in our study material you can find your answer at the below
mentioned link:

http://cbse meritnation
com/study-online/study-material/gdixllqsgiujq9atmok3qw!!/kqwqk4cd2f6jveqcrte9dw!!
in case you face any difficulty, do get back to us