pulse check - if trump raise the age limit to buy a gun, bans “bump stocks”, and tightens the law around background checks... will democrats or trump haters be happy? 

or is confiscation the only way
pulse check - if trump raises the age limit to buy a gun, bans “bump stocks”, and tightens the law around background checks...will conservatives fall in line? or is full access the only right?
absolutely not. the proposal to abolish the electoral college is the horrid, but depressingly predictable, symptom of a populist age.populism is not a schematic philosophy but is rather an attitude toward culture and politics characterized by the veritable worship of "the common man," a distrust of elites, a wariness toward complexity and - significantly - a deep dislike of established institutions. (called these days, "the establishment" or "the swamp.") in this, then, the movement to abolish the electoral college is part of a larger current running through the society.indeed, at the same time that there have been calls to abolish the electoral college, there have also been calls to abolish the u. s. senate, or abolish the filibuster, to pack the supreme court (or limit the terms of justices or make other changes), to raise the voting age to 16 and in some cases to allow illegal immigrants to vote. what all of these have in common is that they take a torch to established institutions, particularly those institutions that put a break on the pure expression of the popular will.indeed, this is not just a phenomenon on the democratic side of the aisle at the moment. the republicans have been vocal in their attacks on the "media" - as if that were a single entity - and on silicon valley - which in the popular mode of the hour has discriminated and oppressed conservatives, it is alleged.most of all, republican who are feigning outrage over senator warren's call to abolish the electoral college are forgetting that one donald j. trump has advocated its abolition as well - at least until it helped him win. mr. trump - like all good populists - is no slave to consistency, after all.at any rate, abolition of the electoral college would be a horrid idea. it would effectively disenfranchise huge swaths of the country as both parties would camp out in california, new york, texas, florida and maybe ohio, leaving the rest of the country to itself. this would also very likely set the stage for the rise of regional parties, with all that would entail for the balkanization of the nation's politics.moreover, if the nation enjoyed the spectacle of the 2000 election, it should be prepared. in that year, the fight was over florida's electoral votes which confined the battle - as a legal and political matter - to the vote in one or two counties in that state. turn the battle into a nationwide popular vote and instantly the fight would move to the count in every close vote in every closely fought district across the country.there is irony in this. 2000 was effectively resolved by a ruling in the supreme court - that bastion of elitist judges and lawyers. abolish the electoral college and close votes across the country will invariably end up in the courts as a routine matter.the electoral college has served the nation well for over 200 years and such long established institutions deserve deference. their endurance certainly suggesting that they have worked as well as anything works in an imperfect world.wise societies realize that. which certainly suggests something about the state of american society. i am far more concerned with people soft on crime yet want to make criminals out of legal gun owners. i am more concerned about people who think any loser should be allowed in america. if anyone has hid out for so many years they should be allowed to stayand if they breed a litter of kids on our tax dollars they should stay. there is already enough evidence to either require another election in some states (which there may not be time for) or require the state party convention (which are often controlled by republicans) to make a decision due to the issues laid out in the legal arguments. trump's team has very valid points and evidence to back up those points. legal process is necessary for legitimacy, but any judge who strictly interprets the law will side with trump’s team. due to the media’s propaganda campaign, i’m sure many judges would be concerned about the ramifications of the legal outcome, but ultimately they have to do their job as arbiters of the law. so trump should win his lawsuits even if the supreme court has to make the final decision. republicans are likely, but not guaranteed to be loyal to their party. trump will likely win in the end... either way, as of now no votes have been certified. if we examine those states that have generally finished their vote counts and have no legal contest at the moment then the current electoral vote count would be 227 biden vs 229 trump. so technically trump is currently winning even if the mainstream media wants to brainwash you into believing something else. in the case of a crisis, like our economy, the president can declare martial law.anyone (not just minority) who dont cooperate ect. with the new world order agenda, or that cant contribute to the government will be gathered by federal agents and taken to concentration camps.god forbid we cant pay our taxes! at least thats the way i understand it. hey. this new generation can just get in line and wait your turn. my generation is still waiting for these exact same changes promised 30 years ago!

jimmy carter and a democratic administration are pledged to bring about the changes we need:

putting limits on how much the doctors and the hospitals can gouge medicare and medicaid and the public. nobody should have to pay $700 a day for a hospital room or $65 to walk into a doctor's office.

making the rich pay their fair share of taxes like everybody else.

the economy: to get the economy moving again by providing a job for every american who wants to work and by bringing inflation under control.\

energy: to establish a coherent energy policy, and to increase emphasis on coal production and increased research on renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind and geothermal. to lead in directing a voluntary conservation program.

welfare reform: to establish a streamlined, simplified welfare system with strong work incentives that promote family stability. to take those able to work out of the system and provide them job training and a job. to give those who cannot work because of age or disability nationwide, fairly uniform benefits varying only according to the cost of living from area to area.

environment: to maintain strong environmental protection laws. to protect against relaxation of our current standards for air quality, water quality or automotive emissions. to preserve the natural heritage of america, and to turn over to future generations a country that is environmentally sound.

education: to increase the federal share of the total cost of education. to assure that the average american family can afford to send their children to college.

agriculture: to develop an agriculture policy which insures farmers a predictable and fair return for their labor, yet is fair to the american consumer. to avoid the republican policy of embargoes on farm products, and aggressively develop our export markets abroad.

tax reform: to move toward a truly progressive and simplified tax system, with reduced tax rates for the average american.

elderly: to recognize that elderly constitute one of our most precious resources. to insure adequate income for retirement; to increase housing for the elderly. to relax mandatory retirement laws. to work or subsidies for reduced fare on public transportation for the elderly.

health care: to establish a comprehensive national health program which will make adequate health care a right for all people, be uniform in scope, and preserve the private relationship between doctor and patient.

defense: to guarantee the security of our nation -- a guarantee of freedom from the threat of successful attack or blackmail and the ability with our allies to maintain peace.

foreign policy: to stop treating our allies as if they were our adversaries. to make it clear that detente is a two-way street. to promote human rights abroad and to deal affirmatively with the social and economic problems of the developing world. to make our total commitment to the security of israel as a jewish state absolutely clear.



reorganization: to reorganize completely the executive branch of government, making it fair, efficient, effective and responsive to out people's needs.


http://www.4president.org/brochures/cart... i support, and have already voted for president trump. lol! real soon! that's why we need a republican president. the left prefers the traditional way of winning elections, getting the most votes. haven't you noticed that hunting and fishing is something that transcends politics and religion and everything? even vp cheney enjoys hunting, and bagging an occassional lawyer. people from all walks of life enjoy hunting and fishing, republicans, democrats, mormons, catholics, baptists, you name it. when you think about all the wars that are fought over religion or politics and the number of people who are killed in the name of religion or politics i sometimes think we should have a religion of hunting where we simply hunt and enjoy life and let everybody else do the the same. nothing to fight over or kill each other over. too many illegal immigrants and pathetic politicians...oh and political correctness.