house health care reform bill: what does, "...and for other purposes." mean?
i just opened the 1990 page house bill revealed yesterday by pelosi.

here's a link... http://www.graction21.com/gf/21804224-house-hcr-bill.pdf

after the gratuitous introduction of house responsible for this mess, the very first line of the bill read as quoted below:

"a bill
to provide affordable, quality health care for all americans
and reduce the growth in health care spending, and
for other purposes."

"...and for other purposes."????

are you kidding me? who knows how many countless lawyers worked on this bill and the very first line that addresses the purpose of the bill included the phrase, "...and for other purposes?"

never mind what other purposes an health care reform bill is suppose to serve, but this is the best wording a group of lawyers could agree on for the first line of a 1990 page law?

what other purposes are there for the bill? the "tax you into oblivion" purpose. the "interview you and advise you to just die" purpose?

the very first line is a bad joke.
your question is useful for the link and for other purposes.
brief answer: hi, what is the reason for getting the investigations? detailed answer: hi, thanks for posting the query, may i know which investigations were done to give the xxxxxxx score for your heart? do you have any previous illness like diabetes and hypertension? do you take any medicines?... please see a doctor or another health care provider comfortable with genital infections to be diagnosed and treated see more... Shawn,
 
If no brighter suggestions appear, you may try the list:
 
 
 
THE LIST
 
 
If things that should work simply refuse to (all possibilities exhausted including the A) - D) below (and carefully making sure you are performing (all) the needed things)), you may try (the relevant part(s) of) the list 1) - 8 ) below.
 
 
Sometimes, (certain) things may fail or stop working for no apparent reason. When the (other) possible reasons/cures fail to work, it may be some kind of (temporay or permane... hi maddie,the purpose of any manipulation is to convince another person that their previously held beliefs are incorrect. one example of a way to manipulate another person is through the practice of gaslighting. think of it as someone who continually turns down the lights in a room (turning down a gas lamp) but tells another person the light is constant, it's their perception or eyesight that is affected. the purpose of gaslighting is to convince another person that they are losing their sanity. how does this transform societal values? on a large scale, if you can convince a large number of people to change their values then society will inevitably shift in its core beliefs and practices. a positive example of this is the icelandic women's protest in 1975 when every woman in the country went on strike for one day. after this protest, women were given equal wages and equal rights under the law. though this strike was not manipulation but civil rights protest, you can see the impact of change on societal values. think about efforts to take away civil rights for one specific group of people: is the language used as a weapon? is it manipulative? deceptive? how would that impact independence and personal identities? if your civil rights were taken away, say your right to vote because of another person's manipulative argument, would you feel less independent? would you feel as though your voice mattered? would you feel more valued by society or less valued by society?good luck with your homework!jessica "yikes! that is a big difference!

while there's nothing you can do to repair your claims history, you can shop around for better rates by comparing rates for [home insurance online](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance/car-and-home-insurance). 

you may be able to get better rates by bundling your home and [auto insurance](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance). 

if you want help comparing rates, leave the hard work to [jerry](https://getjerry.com/signup). jerry pulls quotes from the top 50 providers and delivers the best deals to your phone in minutes. 

the average homeowner pays about **$1,200 a year**, so you're right in thinking that you're paying a lot. in the future, you can safeguard your house against leaks or choose to pay for them out-of-pocket rather than adding to your claims history." 

**more**: [11 car insurance hacks to save you money](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance/car-insurance-hacks) constipation tops the list.......depending on your age and pmhx other things will come into play. absolutely not. the proposal to abolish the electoral college is the horrid, but depressingly predictable, symptom of a populist age.populism is not a schematic philosophy but is rather an attitude toward culture and politics characterized by the veritable worship of "the common man," a distrust of elites, a wariness toward complexity and - significantly - a deep dislike of established institutions. (called these days, "the establishment" or "the swamp.") in this, then, the movement to abolish the electoral college is part of a larger current running through the society.indeed, at the same time that there have been calls to abolish the electoral college, there have also been calls to abolish the u. s. senate, or abolish the filibuster, to pack the supreme court (or limit the terms of justices or make other changes), to raise the voting age to 16 and in some cases to allow illegal immigrants to vote. what all of these have in common is that they take a torch to established institutions, particularly those institutions that put a break on the pure expression of the popular will.indeed, this is not just a phenomenon on the democratic side of the aisle at the moment. the republicans have been vocal in their attacks on the "media" - as if that were a single entity - and on silicon valley - which in the popular mode of the hour has discriminated and oppressed conservatives, it is alleged.most of all, republican who are feigning outrage over senator warren's call to abolish the electoral college are forgetting that one donald j. trump has advocated its abolition as well - at least until it helped him win. mr. trump - like all good populists - is no slave to consistency, after all.at any rate, abolition of the electoral college would be a horrid idea. it would effectively disenfranchise huge swaths of the country as both parties would camp out in california, new york, texas, florida and maybe ohio, leaving the rest of the country to itself. this would also very likely set the stage for the rise of regional parties, with all that would entail for the balkanization of the nation's politics.moreover, if the nation enjoyed the spectacle of the 2000 election, it should be prepared. in that year, the fight was over florida's electoral votes which confined the battle - as a legal and political matter - to the vote in one or two counties in that state. turn the battle into a nationwide popular vote and instantly the fight would move to the count in every close vote in every closely fought district across the country.there is irony in this. 2000 was effectively resolved by a ruling in the supreme court - that bastion of elitist judges and lawyers. abolish the electoral college and close votes across the country will invariably end up in the courts as a routine matter.the electoral college has served the nation well for over 200 years and such long established institutions deserve deference. their endurance certainly suggesting that they have worked as well as anything works in an imperfect world.wise societies realize that. which certainly suggests something about the state of american society. generally, medical treatments for multiple sclerosis, a condition that requires lifelong care, are hellaciously expensive. this is true despite introductions of generic versions, and average u.s. retail prices are usually in the thousands of dollars. medication in the u.s. is always expensive, but ms medications are in another realm entirely, up there with treatments for cancer and rheumatoid arthritis. a 2020 study published by the american academy of neurology found that medicaid spending on … ignorance, poor education, instilled with that from parents, fear of someone who is different, fear of things they don't understand, fear of change, hostility towards people who they perceive are doing better than them, irrational fear of people they believe are trying to take their jobs or worsen their life situation in some way. i could list another dozen. and everybody is a keyboard warrior on social media saying things anonymously they'd never have the guts to say to someone's face.often times, it's a combination but irrational fear and insecurity is usually present. one of the best jokes i've heard that exposes the hypocrisy of racism, fear of immgrants, foreigners etc. is:"if you think immigrants are all criminals, rapists and killers and you think immigrants are all coming to take your jobs, what the hell do you do for a living?" 1. to connect ideas
2. due to
3. too and further
4. to keep the reader interested and to make the ideas clear
5. consequently