republicans: where do you get your political information?
cable news.

talk radio.

magazines and or newspapers.

other.
fox they are not repeating the talking points of the democratic machine.
**Methods of external recruitment**







* Printed media, e.g. newspapers/flyers
* Electronic media, e.g. radio/TV
* Social media/Social networks/Internet/Business websites
* Recruitment agencies
* Walk-ins
* Head hunting
* Professional associationsNetworking
* Educational/Training institutions
* Posters/Bill boards just outside the business there is already enough evidence to either require another election in some states (which there may not be time for) or require the state party convention (which are often controlled by republicans) to make a decision due to the issues laid out in the legal arguments. trump's team has very valid points and evidence to back up those points. legal process is necessary for legitimacy, but any judge who strictly interprets the law will side with trump’s team. due to the media’s propaganda campaign, i’m sure many judges would be concerned about the ramifications of the legal outcome, but ultimately they have to do their job as arbiters of the law. so trump should win his lawsuits even if the supreme court has to make the final decision. republicans are likely, but not guaranteed to be loyal to their party. trump will likely win in the end... either way, as of now no votes have been certified. if we examine those states that have generally finished their vote counts and have no legal contest at the moment then the current electoral vote count would be 227 biden vs 229 trump. so technically trump is currently winning even if the mainstream media wants to brainwash you into believing something else. re: help<br><br>you need to get the documents scanned in and sent through to our offices. dear student,

each radio station is given a different frequency band and these
radio signals are sent at that particular frequency only
for example fm 93 5 or 94 3 etc are given radio frequencies given
in decimals only

if we see each radio station contains name like fm 93 5 or 94 3
etc

regards, they are interviewing other candidates most likely **Journal Entries**

![](https://www.sarthaks.com/?qa=blob&qa_blobid=17748617086734818890) Huh? Roku is not responsible for the content or upkeep of the channels. You will want to reach out to Fox News Corp Corp. for help.

 




[View solution in original post](/t5/Channel-Issues-Questions/Does-Fox-News-not-work-on-ROKU/m-p/611677#M55642) if i may be permitted. i have worked in politics for over 30 years, including time as a legislative director and/or press secretary for four members of the house and - via the u. s. commission on security and cooperation in europe - two senators. my credentials and my sins thereby confessed i offer the following - 1) senate majority leader mitch mcconnell. though not an ideas guy, he is a shrewd and effective parliamentary operator who knows the senate rules perhaps as well or better than any senate majority leader in recent memory. temperate and highly effective, he is a superb coalition builder with an exquisite sense of timing. 2) senator john neely kennedy. also not necessarily an ideas guy, though solidly grounded in his principles, kennedy has a rapier wit that he is not afraid to deploy against both sides. an acid tongue, he calls 'em as he sees 'em, and yet somehow manages to maintain - maybe it is the southern accent - an air of civility and reasonableness. 3) senator ben sasse. a former college president, sasse is one of the most intellectual and thoughtful senators. a man who takes ideas seriously and who understands the consequences of ideas. he is the soft-spoken - and frankly much underestimated - intellectual giant of the senate. 4) senator joe manchin. from west virginia, manchin is a temperate thinker and coalition builder. not given to inflammatory language, he seeks balance and compromise. 5) senator dianne feinstein - although lately i must admit her conduct has disappointed, generally feinstein sticks to her principles - which i, more often than not, do not share - but does so in modulated tones and thoughftully. no fire breather, she makes her case soberly and intellectually. (though to add, of late, some of her actions - particularly in recent kavanaugh supreme court confirmation - have not been at her historically high standard.) 6) former representative trey gowdy - actually, not an active politician any longer and is now a fox commentator, gowdy is a former criminal prosecutor and house member. he knows the law better then most know there own name and brings to his thinking a piercing intellect and consistency of principle like few others. he is sorely missed by me in the house. suffice to say, i could go on, but those figures stand out as my, "if you wake me in the middle of the night and ask me out of the blue, these pop to mind" answers. however, my experience in politics is that, contrary to also the populist contempt, most of those who go into politics are intelligent and civic minded, hard working and eager to make the country better and the people they serve happier. like any large group of human beings, they have their foibles, none are perfect and some are downright awful. however, overall, the american public gets better than it appreciates. here are a few that i usually recommend: **Journal Entries**![](https://www.sarthaks.com/?qa=blob&qa_blobid=352568037447600174)