what is the difference between private and public colleges?
there are a lot of people who may be aware of what private and public means. when you say private, this can be a sector that is owned by someone in particular. a private business is something that is controlled by certain
if it's a private school, it can choose to not accept them nba) but the halves vs quarters are because the full game length is shorter in college than in nba, so quarters would be extremely short (can't remember the time off the top of my head). quarters would only be 10 minutes instead of 12. in college, you get 5 fouls for 40 minutes of game time, 1 per every 8 minutes. impact : changing c# methods from private to public columbia and yale are really hard to get into. nyu is difficult too, but not quite as expensive and more realistic (not saying you cant get into the others, you definitely could, but nyu is just as good in my opinion). and your gpa is great, mine was only an 86 and i got into the university of rochester (didn't go due to costs), so a 90 could definitely get you into even better schools. i also didn't have a job, didn't do any sports, nor did i participate in any clubs or orgainizations (funny thing is, i'm doing all of that now that i'm in college). you'll do fine, just as long as you make the most out of the rest of this year and especially next year. take a lot of ap's, seriously, they're probably the reason why i'm not going to a community college. get a summer job. you're already in a sport, so you're good for extracurriculars. also, take the act. it's more practical and, in my opinion, easier. i got a 1370 on the sat but a 32 on the act, which is the equivalent of a 1440. colleges don't even care which one you take now anyway, and you could always take it again (i did for the sat, raised my score 150 points the 2nd time). gpa isn't as important as everyone makes it out to be, but you should still keep it as high as you can. juniors. college students are classified the same as high school students. 1st year are freshman. 2nd year are sophomores. 3rd year are juniors, and 4th year are seniors. hi, you can characterize the better college on various points and characteristics.




 for you i'm comparing both symbiosis and nmims ;





 points                                                symbiosis:-                                nmims:-



* established year                                2008                                          2006
* total b.tech branches                        10                                              12
* ranking by india today                   12                                              14
* highest package(placement)      14.50(lakhs)/annum            4.5(lakhs)/median
* total fees                                      10.60(lakhs)/4years           12.46(lakhs)/4years
* eligibility                                            12th(50%)                              12th(50%)



 so now you can better decide your best from the two.




 moreover you can also compare colleges on careers360 college comparision tool(link mentioned below);




<https://www.careers360.com/compare-colleges?icn=college-compare-landing&ici=question_detail>




 good luck. hello aspirant,

well the thing is that, giet rajahmundry (godavari institute of engineering and technology) is a college, whereas giet gunupur (gandhi institute of engineering and technology) is a state university. below i have provided the required details about both the collgeg & university - 

**giet college of engineering :**

* the college is a private owned college and was eshtablished in the year 2009 and has a faculty of 85 people.
* the college is affiliated to jawaharlal nehru technological university, kakinada.
* the college offers only b.e./b.tech programmes.
* it has the facilities like boys hostel, girls hostel, gym, library, cafeteria, sports, medical/hospital, wifi, transport, alumni association etc.
* as per the students reviews, the college is pretty good.

**giet university :**

* this is a state university and is privately owned and was eshtablished in the year 1997. the university campus is about 43 acres with 278 faculty people.
* the university is approved by ugc.
* the university offers many ug and pg programmes like b.e./b.tech, m.e./m.tech, bba, mba, b.sc, m.sc., mca, msw etc.
* the facilities available in the university campus are such as boys hostel, girls hostel, gym, library, cafeteria, sports, medical/hospital, wifi, transport, alumni association, swimming pool, convenience store, bank and parking facilities, guest room etc.
* talking about placements, b.e./b.tech students gets a median package of 3.72 lakhs where as m.e./m.tech students gets a median package of 3.95 lakhs.
* as per the students reviews, the university is quite good.

now according to me, if one is considering facilities, infrastructure, experience then he/she should go for giet university, gunupur. the university has all the required facilities, is ugc approved, has good teaching experience since its a old college and placements are also okay. on the other hand giet college of engineering, rajamundry may not have state of the art facilities, or campus or that much experinece but the college is pretty good. 

you can also go through this links and checkout the details about both the colleges -  

* giet rajamubdry : <https://www.careers360.com/colleges/giet-college-of-engineering-rajahmundry>
* giet gunupur : <https://www.careers360.com/university/giet-university-gunupur>

good luck !!! absolutely not. the proposal to abolish the electoral college is the horrid, but depressingly predictable, symptom of a populist age.populism is not a schematic philosophy but is rather an attitude toward culture and politics characterized by the veritable worship of "the common man," a distrust of elites, a wariness toward complexity and - significantly - a deep dislike of established institutions. (called these days, "the establishment" or "the swamp.") in this, then, the movement to abolish the electoral college is part of a larger current running through the society.indeed, at the same time that there have been calls to abolish the electoral college, there have also been calls to abolish the u. s. senate, or abolish the filibuster, to pack the supreme court (or limit the terms of justices or make other changes), to raise the voting age to 16 and in some cases to allow illegal immigrants to vote. what all of these have in common is that they take a torch to established institutions, particularly those institutions that put a break on the pure expression of the popular will.indeed, this is not just a phenomenon on the democratic side of the aisle at the moment. the republicans have been vocal in their attacks on the "media" - as if that were a single entity - and on silicon valley - which in the popular mode of the hour has discriminated and oppressed conservatives, it is alleged.most of all, republican who are feigning outrage over senator warren's call to abolish the electoral college are forgetting that one donald j. trump has advocated its abolition as well - at least until it helped him win. mr. trump - like all good populists - is no slave to consistency, after all.at any rate, abolition of the electoral college would be a horrid idea. it would effectively disenfranchise huge swaths of the country as both parties would camp out in california, new york, texas, florida and maybe ohio, leaving the rest of the country to itself. this would also very likely set the stage for the rise of regional parties, with all that would entail for the balkanization of the nation's politics.moreover, if the nation enjoyed the spectacle of the 2000 election, it should be prepared. in that year, the fight was over florida's electoral votes which confined the battle - as a legal and political matter - to the vote in one or two counties in that state. turn the battle into a nationwide popular vote and instantly the fight would move to the count in every close vote in every closely fought district across the country.there is irony in this. 2000 was effectively resolved by a ruling in the supreme court - that bastion of elitist judges and lawyers. abolish the electoral college and close votes across the country will invariably end up in the courts as a routine matter.the electoral college has served the nation well for over 200 years and such long established institutions deserve deference. their endurance certainly suggesting that they have worked as well as anything works in an imperfect world.wise societies realize that. which certainly suggests something about the state of american society. the jim crow laws were state and local laws in the united states enacted between 1876 and 1965. they mandated de jure segregation in all public facilities, with a "separate but equal" status for black americans and members of other non-white racial groups.

some examples of jim crow laws are the segregation of public schools, public places and public transportation, and the segregation of restrooms and restaurants for whites and blacks. the u.s. military was also segregated. these jim crow laws were separate from the 1800-66 black codes, which had also restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of african americans. state-sponsored school segregation was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court of the united states in 1954 in brown v. board of education. generally, the remaining jim crow laws were overruled by the civil rights act of 1964[1] and the voting rights act of 1965.

in addition to the problems that southerners encountered in learning free labor management after the end of slavery, black americans represented the confederacy's civil war defeat: "with white supremacy challenged throughout the south, many whites sought to protect their former status by threatening african americans who exercised their new rights."[8] white democrats used their power to segregate public spaces and facilities in law and reestablish dominance over blacks in the south.

one rationale for the systematic exclusion of black americans from southern public society was that it was for their own protection. an early 20th century scholar suggested that having allowed blacks in white schools would mean "constantly subjecting them to adverse feeling and opinion", which might lead to "a morbid race consciousness".[9] this perspective took anti-black sentiment for granted, because bigotry was widespread in the south. i entered with no major (the "no major" option in community college is "liberal arts"). then, i majored in film after finishing the gen ed courses and going to university. (yeah, i knew it was risky, but i figured i didn't want to regret what i chose in college and wanted a career i could enjoy more than a safe bet.) after six months, i realized that film school is very stupid. but also, they're full of super-woke lefties, so i got the f*ck outta there.i switched my major to english; which is a more employable, more broad version of the same thing. i always wanted to be a writer and producer (still do; honestly; i've written a lot and come up with many show ideas). you can get a job as an entertainment writer with an english degree, but also do so much more. i was wrongfully expelled from my first university and spent three years in a lawsuit against them, which messed up my rate of getting a degree by a lot. i had to start most of my classes all over again in a new university while waiting on the lawsuit. by the time the lawsuit settled out of court for a measly $43,000 (which had a stipulation in it that all of that had to go towards school and tuition; i couldn't get to keep anything for myself), i graduated, and went for my masters in english for another two years. i only just got my masters in may of 2019. so i switched my major twice. now i'm a teacher in korea with a masters in english. i don't regret it, but the unjustified expulsion and lawsuit really f*cked up my path in life by three years.