Rejected due to Intellectual Property Violation





Trying to figure out why. It's a clip of a woman looking out at a beach. I have a model release and everything. Anyway to appeal these decisions?
Thank you, I didn't realize this was a video. I checked out the full clip and there are a couple of issues. The main issue that I think has led to the rejection is the audio. You can hear a voice saying "perfect" in the beginning of the clip. That person needs to sign a release also for the audio. My recommendation is to remove the audio completely and resubmit.

It's also possible that the phone is identifiable as it is more visible in other parts of the clip.

Kind regards,

Mat Hayward
the nudity/exposed skin isn't on its own the reason why such women aren't taken as seriously. rather, it's their inability to recognize and adapt to their situation/environment and to observe the expectations of that particular situation.example: no one judges women who are showing tons of skin on a beach, because that's an appropriate place to show tons of skin. but if you have an office job and you go to work dressed like a call girl, then you will be dressed inappropriately for the situation, and people won't take you seriously. it's no different than if you were to go meet with an investment banker about managing your money, and when you show up to his office, he's wearing shorts and a hoodie - while that *technically* doesn't mean he's not good at his job, such clothes are inappropriate for that context, and a lot of potential customers are going to walk away.people who aren't able to determine that they are dressed inappropriately for their situation are having their judgement called into question more than the clothes themselves. if your judgement is questionable (or outright wrong), then people aren't going to take you seriously in other areas either. Hopefully, you called the police right when this occurred and have a police report. It will be up to the solicitor's office on whether or not to file charges. Unfortunately, this person may be judgment proof. This means that even if you were to sue them and successfully obtain a judgment, you may have no way of actually collecting against that judgment. copyrights are free and automatic (after 1989). but they only cover the "expression of an idea", not the idea itself. functional aspects of an artistic sculpture are not protected by copyright. they will eventually expire. they are international (bern convention, etc). there are criminal sanctions available against people who make a profit or steal your profit by infringing copyright. also statutory damages. it is somewhat difficult to determine exactly what is the status of a copyright unless you know when it was first created, who the author is, when it was published, where it was published, the nationality of the author, when or if the author died, whether the work was published with necessary formalities (prior to 1989), etc.

patents are expensive and only issued after examination, which can take years. they protect inventions including machines, chemical compositions, processes, etc. other types of patents protect ornamental designs or certain plants. patents last only a couple of decades and are difficult and expensive to protect. however, they prevent anyone from making, using, selling or importing your invention in any country where you have obtained and maintained a valid patent. to sue on a patent you must have an issued patent in the country where the alleged infringement occurred. just filing patent applications in twenty countries may cost over $100,000. then there are prosecution fees, issuance fees, annual maintenance fees, etc. enforcing a patent in a us federal court will cost upwards of a million dollars.

trademarks (in the usa) are automatic from the first use in commerce. however, your protection is only limited to your local use and for the present goods and serviices to which you attach your brand. you can optionally register you brand in any state, but most valuable brands are registered in the us patent and trademark office, meaning more paperwork and fees. however, the issued registration can be used to prevent others from using a confusingly similar mark anywhere in the usa, and any countries named in your madrid protocol international protection application (more fees), pertaining to the classifications of goods or services you have registered. common law trademark protections (lanham act) last as long as you continue to use your trademark. registrations expire if you do not maintain them.

some works are protected by patents, copyrights and trademarks simultaneously. like a nike shoe" the functions and ornamental designs (and maybe the tread) are patented, the nike name and logo are trademarks, and any photos, descriptions, advertising, video, etc describing or showing them. are copyrighted. No, you can't.


It's a security/anti-phishing feature. Have you tried restarting your browser? 🤦‍♂️ Anyone can sue anyone over anything. The question is what would the damages be. Talk with an attorney if you wish to pursue this. good Luck,
  
~Katie Unfortunately, the law changed and that is now a violation. He "picked" you out of the crowd.


Plead not guilty and contact a local attorney to try and knock it down from points to no points.


Good Luck.


Joseph A. Lo Piccolo, Esq.
  
President, Criminal Courts Bar Association 11'-12'
  
Hession Bekoff & Lo Piccolo
  
1103 Stewart Ave, Suite 200
  
Garden City, NY 11530
  
516-408-3666 (o) / 516-408-3833 (f)
  
[[email protected]](/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection) the score has been removed. Hi,


What attempts have you made at this? Have you got any code written yet?


Thanks