How do I go about seeing video incriminating video?



A friend is being charged with F3 failure to comply and fleeing and eluding. Up til the final day of pre trial his lawyer has said he wasn't worried because "they didn't have anything". Show up to court and all the sudden there is a video and he's advised to take a plea deal of 1 year prison 3 years on paper. If he doesn't he will likely get 3 yrs prison. How can we go about seeing this apparent incriminating video
The defendant can review the video with his attorney. You, as a third party, have no legal right to review it.
one idea can be videos have frames so, vectorize each frame and calculate dtw between two consecutive frames. this will help in gaining the difference in each frame and perhaps help in classification. hope this helps you. they are drawing charges against her at this moment, and at her hearing she is facing 90 days in jail. everyone who is caught on driving with suspended license isn't always taken to jail because sometimes a lot of people don't know their licenses are suspended, but they have a court date and the judge determines what their penalty will be. it all depends on the officers, city, county, etc. i wouldn't say she is getting a "get of jail" free card, but they are giving her the benefit of the doubt like other citizens. it happened to my ex boyfriend before that is why i know everyone isn't always arrested on the spot.... been all over the news in nyc, as i am sure you know. the police are looking into charging him as an accomplice. he videotaped robberies and even a few murders and is now selling the dvds on line and on the street. the police, rightly os, are saying he encouraged them to do crime and therfore is an accomplice. 
i think this guy will see cuffs real soon.



n.y. man films 'criminals gone wild' 
by alison gendar and corky siemaszko
daily news staff writers 

tuesday, december 11th 2007, 4:00 am 

 
shocking 'criminals gone wild' video features footage of violent crimes as they take place and interviews with criminals who perpetrate them.
 
a brooklyn man, ousala (fd) aleem, is getting rich off the profits.
meet the most depraved director in new york.

ousala (fd) aleem has found a way to capitalize on violent city crime by filming felonies as they happen, slapping them on a dvd - and selling them for $26.98 apiece, shipping included. 

the 25-year-old filmmaker from crown heights, brooklyn, said he's sold several thousand copies of "criminals gone wild," and with christmas coming there's even more demand for his movie mayhem. 

"you try to make a product for the family, something that everybody can see, and nobody wants to buy it," said aleem, a self-taught filmmaker who used to host a local tv show called "fdtv." 

"the minute you come out with crime footage everybody wants to buy it. my pockets are fat now." 

aleem said he has no problem finding thugs to film - the word is out. they call him. "it's sad, but these people really don't care, they just want to be on tv," said aleem. "i get phone calls from people who say, 'come over to my part of town if you want to see some real crime.'" 

the nypd is reviewing the dvd trailer posted on youtube to see if aleem's footage is as real as he claims it is - and if there's enough to warrant an investigation of the filmmaker. 

real or not, what aleem put on the trailer is as raw as it comes. it opens with a driver being carjacked by a gunman, shows a man unloading his gun on a man lying prone on the ground, and features a closeup of yet another thug stating in a matter-of-fact way, "yeah, i killed somebody, man." 

another self-declared criminal with a blue bandanna covering the lower half of his face boasts that he has never done time, adding, "which actually means i'm good at what i do." later, that same bandanna-wearing man is filmed on the street closing in on a victim and can be heard saying, "we're about to rob this na live [on] tv." 

that piece of footage in particular outraged the flatbush, brooklyn, man who alerted the daily news about aleem's shocking dvd. the man, who asked not to be named, claims he was the victim the bandanna-wearing bandit robbed last summer - and is convinced aleem filmed the stickup on church ave. 

"i know that was the guy who robbed me," the victim said. "he showed the gun and he said, 'don't say nothing. don't say nothing. just hand it over.' across the street i seen the guy with the camera." 

the flatbush man said that after the gunman made off with his money, he chased after the cameraman. "then he starts walking fast and i said, 'excuse me.'" 

"then i thought about it and stopped because i live around here and i didn't want it to get back to me," said the man, who said he reported the robbery to cops. "i've been robbed twice before and the police didn't do anything. i just don't understand how people can do something like that, tape it and say, 'let's put it on youtube.'" 

last week, another youtube video of a gang of foulmouthed teenage girls pounding on a male subway rider outraged the city Thank you, I didn't realize this was a video. I checked out the full clip and there are a couple of issues. The main issue that I think has led to the rejection is the audio. You can hear a voice saying "perfect" in the beginning of the clip. That person needs to sign a release also for the audio. My recommendation is to remove the audio completely and resubmit.

It's also possible that the phone is identifiable as it is more visible in other parts of the clip.

Kind regards,

Mat Hayward if you had to pay in money when you filed then they are going to charge you interest for being late.

they are probably conducting an internal audit of all of your past returns right now, that is why you haven't gotten the notice yet. if they determine that you did this intentionally, which is likely, they'll access a punitive fine on top of the interest they'll charge you.

otherwise they might just send a warning. although it is illegal to file late, if you didn't owe them money they probably won't make a big deal out of it. just the same, they are probably auditing all of your recent returns. check this video about. this isn't "now just showing up", this has been known for years but the media has been ignoring and or covering it up. she should go to prison with hillary and huma. A.  I think your analysis of the situation is correct. Your husband’s fears about not being able to perform are bigger than his concern for his 21 year marriage. Imagine how big those fears must be! The doctors who were trying to help weren’t helpful in that they treated the physical problem without taking into account the emotional message of their interventions. I wish they had talked to him about how normal it is for a man who is under lots of pressure to have trouble performing. I wish they had included you in the discussions.


You probably can’t help him understand that he is running away. At this point, he’s had 10 years of believing that whatever is wrong can’t be fixed. For that reason, I think it would be more helpful for you to start going to a therapist yourself — not because I think you are the patient here but because your relationship is in trouble. When one member of a couple has a problem, the couple has a problem. When one member of a couple starts to go to [therapy](https://psychcentral.com/psychotherapy/) and starts learning new ways to manage stress, it shows. Often that makes the other member of the couple willing to give it a try. Work with a therapist who can hear your whole story and who can give you suggestions about how to approach your husband in new ways. 



You’ve done what you can on your own. Your husband is a lucky man indeed to have a wife who is as understanding and as willing to help as you are. But both you and your husband are missing out on the intimacy that is a special part of a long marriage. For that reason, I encourage you to make an appointment and get started with therapy. 


I wish you well.  

Dr. Marie


Work as Avoidance Technique I'll assume you mean how much actual time would be served on a particular sentence... it starts with "good time credits" that are applied to the sentence calculator a the beginning of the sentence. An inmate can only lose that good time by having behavior issues or breaking numerous rules. In federal you get 15%, state prison ranges from 15-30% good time. The difference with the state is that they're also dealing with a parole system too that can release an offender having done only one-third of their sentence. Actually, under the California Implied Consent/Admin Per Se laws, you may have something to worry about. I would do two things if I were you: 1) check with the California DMV to make sure your driving status is still good so that you don't add to your sitaution by getting a driving on a suspended license charge; and 2) contact a local DUI lawyer for a free consultation to make sure you haven't missed anything (doesn't mean you have to hire anybody... just call so you know for sure rather than relying on this forum). See the source below for information on the CA DMV and implied consent for DUI cases. There are also links on that page to all of the relevant official CA DUI guides. Good luck with your case.