What does Arraignment, 3 years after indictment mean?



 2017 indictment, arraignment hearings and Pre-trials and trial calendars, not guilty plea throughout 2017/2018/2019 now 2020 is set for ANOTHER arraignment, what does this mean?   

Felony case
Tough to say without knowing more. They could have re-indicted your case or it could be on an arraignment calendar just to keep track of the case since it is so old. If you have a lawyer, he or she should be able to tell you what is going on.
if you had to pay in money when you filed then they are going to charge you interest for being late.

they are probably conducting an internal audit of all of your past returns right now, that is why you haven't gotten the notice yet. if they determine that you did this intentionally, which is likely, they'll access a punitive fine on top of the interest they'll charge you.

otherwise they might just send a warning. although it is illegal to file late, if you didn't owe them money they probably won't make a big deal out of it. just the same, they are probably auditing all of your recent returns. not a chance. you have convictions for relevant crimes. you're a thief and you carry a knife. they are drawing charges against her at this moment, and at her hearing she is facing 90 days in jail. everyone who is caught on driving with suspended license isn't always taken to jail because sometimes a lot of people don't know their licenses are suspended, but they have a court date and the judge determines what their penalty will be. it all depends on the officers, city, county, etc. i wouldn't say she is getting a "get of jail" free card, but they are giving her the benefit of the doubt like other citizens. it happened to my ex boyfriend before that is why i know everyone isn't always arrested on the spot.... this isn't "now just showing up", this has been known for years but the media has been ignoring and or covering it up. she should go to prison with hillary and huma. my guess is that he is full of sh*t!

after independent counsel lawrence e. walsh's appointment in december 1986, 14 persons were charged with criminal offenses. eleven persons were convicted, but two convictions were overturned on appeal. two persons were pardoned before trial and one case was dismissed when the bush administration declined to declassify information necessary for trial. on december 24, 1992, president bush pardoned caspar w. weinberger, duane r. clarridge, clair e. george, elliott abrams, alan d. fiers, jr., and robert c. mcfarlane. 

completed trials and pleas 


elliott abrams -- pleaded guilty october 7, 1991, to two misdemeanor charges of withholding information from congress about secret government efforts to support the nicaraguan contra rebels during a ban on such aid. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced abrams november 15, 1991, to two years probation and 100 hours community service. abrams was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

carl r. channell -- pleaded guilty april 29, 1987, to one felony count of conspiracy to defraud the united states. u.s. district judge stanley s. harris sentenced channell on july 7, 1989, to two years probation. 

thomas g. clines -- indicted february 22, 1990, on four felony counts of underreporting his earnings to the irs in the 1985 and 1986 tax years; and falsely stating on his 1985 and 1986 tax returns that he had no foreign financial accounts. on september 18, 1990, clines was found guilty of all charges. u.s. district judge norman p. ramsey in baltimore, md., on december 13, 1990, sentenced clines to 16 months in prison and $40,000 in fines. he was ordered to pay the cost of the prosecution. the fourth circuit u.s. court of appeals in richmond, va., on february 27, 1992, upheld the convictions. clines served his prison sentence. 

alan d. fiers, jr. -- pleaded guilty july 9, 1991, to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from congress about secret efforts to aid the nicaraguan contras. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced fiers january 31, 1992, to one year probation and 100 hours community service. fiers was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

clair e. george -- indicted september 6, 1991, on 10 counts of perjury, false statements and obstruction in connection with congressional and grand jury investigations. george's trial on nine counts ended in a mistrial on august 26, 1992. following a second trial on seven counts, george was found guilty december 9, 1992, of two felony charges of false statements and perjury before congress. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge royce c. lamberth set sentencing for february 18, 1993. george was pardoned on december 24, 1992, before sentencing occurred. 

albert hakim -- pleaded guilty november 21, 1989, to a misdemeanor of supplementing the salary of oliver l. north. lake resources inc., in which hakim was the principal shareholder, pleaded guilty to a corporate felony of theft of government property in diverting iran arms sales proceeds to the nicaraguan contras and other activities. hakim was sentenced by u.s. district judge gerhard a. gesell on february 1, 1990, to two years probation and a $5,000 fine; lake resources was ordered dissolved. 

robert c. mcfarlane -- pleaded guilty march 11, 1988, to four misdemeanor counts of withholding information from congress. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced mcfarlane on march 3, 1989, to two years probation, $20,000 in fines and 200 hours community service. mcfarlane was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

richard r. miller -- pleaded guilty may 6, 1987, to one felony count of conspiracy to defraud the united states. u.s. district judge stanley s. harris sentenced miller on july 6, 1989, to two years probation and 120 hours of community service. 

oliver l. north -- indicted march 16, 1988, on 16 felony counts. after standing trial on 12, north was convicted may 4, 1989 of three charges: accepting an illegal gratuity, aiding and abetting in the obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and destruction of documents. he was sentenced by u.s. district judge gerhard a. gesell on july 5, 1989, to a three-year suspended prison term, two years probation, $150,000 in fines and 1,200 hours community service. a three-judge appeals panel on july 20, 1990, vacated north's conviction for further proceedings to determine whether his immunized testimony influenced witnesses in the trial. the supreme court declined to review the case. judge gesell dismissed the case september 16, 1991, after hearings on the immunity issue, on the motion of independent counsel. 

john m. poindexter -- indicted march 16, 1988, on seven felony charges. after standing trial on five charges, poindexter was found guilty april 7, 1990, on all counts: conspiracy (obstruction of inquiries and proceedings, false statements, falsification, destruction and removal of documents); two counts of obstruction of congress and two counts of false statements. u.s. district judge harold h. greene sentenced poindexter june 11, 1990, to six months in prison on each count, to be served concurrently. a three-judge appeals panel on november 15, 1991, reversed the convictions on the ground that poindexter's immunized testimony may have influenced the trial testimony of witnesses. the supreme court on december 7, 1992, declined to review the case. in 1993, the indictment was dismissed on the motion of independent counsel. 

richard v. secord -- indicted march 16, 1988 on six felony charges. on may 11, 1989, a second indictment was issued charging nine counts of impeding and obstructing the select iran/contra committees. secord was scheduled to stand trial on 12 charges. he pleaded guilty november 8, 1989, to one felony count of false statements to congress. secord was sentenced by u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., on january 24, 1990, to two years probation. 

pre-trial pardons 


duane r. clarridge -- indicted november 26, 1991, on seven counts of perjury and false statements about a secret shipment of u.s. hawk missiles to iran. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge harold h. greene set a march 15, 1993, trial date. clarridge was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

caspar w. weinberger -- indicted june 16, 1992, on five counts of obstruction, perjury and false statements in connection with congressional and independent counsel investigations of iran/ contra. on september 29, the obstruction count was dismissed. on october 30, a second indictment was issued, charging one false statement count. the second indictment was dismissed december 11, leaving four counts remaining. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge thomas f. hogan set a january 5, 1993, trial date. weinberger was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

dismissal 


joseph f. fernandez -- indicted june 20, 1988 on five counts of conspiracy to defraud the united states, obstructing the inquiry of the tower commission and making false statements to government agencies. the case was dismissed in the district of columbia for venue reasons on the motion of independent counsel. a four-count indictment was issued in the eastern district of virginia on april 24, 1989. u.s. district judge claude m. hilton dismissed the four-count case november 24, 1989, after attorney general richard thornburgh blocked the disclosure of classified information ruled relevant to the defense. the u.s. court of appeals for the fourth circuit in richmond, va., on september 6, 1990, upheld judge hilton's rulings under the classified information procedures act (cipa). on october 12, 1990, the attorney general filed a final declaration that he would not disclose the classified information. I'll assume you mean how much actual time would be served on a particular sentence... it starts with "good time credits" that are applied to the sentence calculator a the beginning of the sentence. An inmate can only lose that good time by having behavior issues or breaking numerous rules. In federal you get 15%, state prison ranges from 15-30% good time. The difference with the state is that they're also dealing with a parole system too that can release an offender having done only one-third of their sentence. a traffic ticket is a notice of violation. the statute of
limitations is to prevent one from being accused of a crime when
the witnesses may no longer be available and defense difficult. in
this case, you have already been notified of the violation and have
not defended against it in the time allotted. as such, a traffic
ticket does not expire and is not subject to a statute of
limitations. for most schools, your application is considered complete once all parts of your application have been sent in; this includes test scores. therefore, unless you specifically request otherwise, it's going to be a toss-up as to whether or not your application gets looked at before your second set of s… if it says jan 2021, then it will be in jan 2021. it can take up to a year for the injectable to be cleared from your system.<br><br>best wishes