svg icons missing color
thinkwise documentation recommends using svg icons because of their scalability. once i read this i immediately switched to the svg format and our application is now full of them. they indeed render great and are also very easy to customize with tools such as inkscape. the readability of the format also makes it a great candidate for scripting leading to more dynamic icons instead of just static ones. svg seems the way to go for any gui.

the problem though is that, for us at least, they often don't render well in the web application. they do appear and every button with an svg icon works so there are no functionality issues. however they often miss color and appear in shades of grey. here's an example:


the icons in the windows application are at the top and the same icons through the web interface are at the bottom.

it gets stranger than that. sometimes some of the svg icons in the browser do have full color and this seems to occur quite randomly. we tested in chrome, firefox and internet explorer.

first i thought this might have something to do with how inkscape formats svg code but it also occurs with svg files from other sources.

the first icon in the screenshot can be downloaded for testing and reference. when opened with a browser directly the color (green in this case) shows fine. it just seems that the web application does something making the color disappear.

we just upgraded to version 2019.1 and the problem hasn't gone away. is this a known issue? i know you guys are working hard to get the new universal interface to production phase but if you find the time for a hotfix for this particular issue that would be really nice.
hi roland, the universal gui will ultimately become a fully-fledged alternative to the windows, web and mobile user interfaces. we will make sure that current layouts (with tabs and inline details) in windows and web are also supported in the universal gui, to make the transition as smooth as possible!
Hi Pete,

  
check the compression you have selected for the PNGs (in Flash CC Library -> right click the PNG -> properties). If you selected "Photo (JPEG)" compression then the PNGs are not displayed. Select "Lossless (PNG/GIF)" and export the SWC again.

Hope this helps.

Best regards

Wolfgang Then it shouldn’t be a problem to set the InDesign Transparency Blend Space to RGB. Also when you export for screens don’t use a PDF/X preset, they are designed for press output. Use the Export Output tab to convert the ID doc to sRGB.


 


CMYK Blend Space:


 


![Screen Shot 10.png](https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/150842iD57F1CC3C78841C4/image-size/large?v=1.0&px=999 "Screen Shot 10.png")


 


RGB Blend Space:


![Screen Shot 11.png](https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/150843i56A067219BAD62EE/image-size/large?v=1.0&px=999 "Screen Shot 11.png") > 
> 
> | [meljtabb](/adobe-users/10558700) wrote:I'm not sure if this is a color space issue or a calibration issue or something else entirely.  |
> 
> 

You seem to be using the Windows Photos App, which is not color managed, and will not display correct colors.

Lightroom is color managed, and will display correct colors, as long as the monitor profile is correct.

This difference in color is more pronounced if you have wide gamut monitor, in which case you have to use only color managed applications to view your work.

Bridge and [Irfanview](http://www.irfanview.com/) are both free and color managed (you have to enable color management under Settings in Irfanview).

On Windows 10, the Windows Photo Viewer is apparently still color managed, but it's hidden somewhere. Do a search for it.

A paid option is the latest version of ACDSee (20).


> 
> 
> | My camera (Nikon D750) is set to sRGB |
> 
> 

The color space you set in the camera only affects jpgs (and the jpg embedded in the raw files), if you shoot raw, it doesn't matter which color space you choose. > 
> But how is this achieved?
> 
> 
> 


The system is not perfect. I personally do not like a lot of dumb decisions they made. But the basic idea is that they have:


* A catalog of consistent **printed** colors.
* A set of base colors and the **formulas** to achive the derivated colors.
* The base colors have some **specific values on colorimetry** that are repeatable by diferent manufacturers of inks.



> 
> I assume there are no "Pantone Inks", right?
> 
> 
> 


Yes and no. **Pantone is the system** to have a consistent color. Then, diferent **ink manufacturers** make a set of base inks based on the specifications.


So a manufacturer "HappyInks Inc." make an ink, for example "Pantone Reflex Blue"


**Printers** then go to the formula guide to find the recipy for the colors on the catalog, and go and buy from "Happy Inks" the basic set of colors.


They combine "Pantone Reflex Blue" with "Pantone Sunrise Yellow" in some specified proportions (from the pantone formula guide) to achive "Green XXXc".


If you are going to need a lot of ink of one specific color, the printer do not mix the base inks themselves, but ask for "Happy Inks" to make them some kilos of the ink (based, again on the pantone specifications).


The quality of diferent brands can be more or less accurate. Besides that some characteristics of inks can differ because some could be oriented to silk print, or textiles etc.



> 
> the printer needs in RGB.
> 
> 
> 


This is a biiiiiig mistake.


RGB is not by any means an acurate color reference. Either your printer is lazy or he is simply using some kind of digital print (but still is ignorant(*).


You need to include a RGB profile. Either sRGB or Adobe 1998 but you need to design using a CMYK profile, which obviously you do not have. So ask for which one is more suitable for that.


If they have no idea or say something like "It does not matter" use one according to your location. SWOP 2, Fogra, Gracol, etc.



> 
> Will the colours vary too much if using a Pantone - RGB convertor?
> 
> 
> 


If the project is on flat inks, the proper step would be that you deliver a project in Pantone and let them do the conversions, so they are responsable to match the color the best way possible.


This is why I say they are Ignorant. (*) They ignore what is the calibration of their own machine. They should profile it and give you some clues on what "generic profile" suits them the most.



> 
> textile print
> 
> 
> 


This does not say much. Are you printing rolls and rolls of fabric? Are you printing a Tshirt on a digital medium, like a logo for a student party? Are you using silk print for the campain for a company?


**An Aditional note**



> 
> will the colours vary too much
> 
> 
> 


Colors vary for a looooooooot of reasons.


My clasic example, grab a water based cyan marker. You have a specific ink one and only one.


Now go an paint everywhere you want. A news paper, a magazine, a window, a white towel, toilet paper, your hand.


See? The exact same ink vary a lot. This is why you must have an output color profile, so this gives the internal conversions and calculations to have the most acurate color possible due this combination of factors, which color on which medium.


This is why the printer should be responsable for the color conversions.


**Aditional Note 2**


There are some conversions from pantone to cmyk and rgb... Ouch.


This are very specific conversions. On some "ideal" situations.


More or less how an ink will be printed following exact specifications, for example a CMYK: type of paper, type of inks, controlled ammount of them (densitometry), etc.


For an RGB one they assume a calibrated monitor, Correct gamma, correct temperature, sRGB profile. But again this rgb simulation is for output for a web page for example, not as a printable file.


Spot color (Pantone), or Color selection (CMYK)



Depending on the type of design you have the choice to print in either of this 2 color modes.


For example, a design with gradients and diferent colors most likely needs to be printed in color selection.


But some other type of design needs to be printed with spot inks, or direct colors, this reduces costs and aditionally allow the colors to be consistent


[![](https://otake.com.mx/Foros/Directa.jpg)](https://otake.com.mx/Foros/Directa.jpg) hi tomica, - - i can suggest that you try the following: -     - remove all of the styles to see whether some specific css is affecting the buttons appearance. -     - upgrade to latest telerik ui version - 2015.2.826 - if the above steps, however, do not help it would be better to provide us with a runnable sample that reproduces the issue, so that we can investigate it further. - - regards, - danail vasilev - telerik - - do you want to have your say when we set our development plans? - do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed? - explore the - telerik feedback portal - and vote to affect the priority of the items - How a. ch said I have also seen this with insufficient memory issues and also packages that were left with the same package id and even if the graphics need to be resized. What was said:


If you [support multiple screens](https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=) , I would make sure there are graphics in each MDPI, HDPI, XHDPI respectively and that they are [optimized](https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=) and set to the [appropriate DPI](https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=) . This should ensure that all devices and API levels play well.



  




 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
 
  

Even if that isn't the root of your problem, it's good to keep an eye on efficiency and reliability. okay, so here’s what i created to “fix” the readability.

in the window paint event add this code for each control you wish to see better.

if color.isdarkmode and lightskin then

var r as double = popupmenu1.height-20 // just in case the height got larger than 20 (macos default)

g.drawingcolor =… hi [@kkutter](/u/kkutter),

can you provide a little more context as to what your goals are?

confluence makes aui’s buttons available through their product. since aui 7.2, aui’s buttons are styled with an alpha-transparent background colour so that they appear on light grey backgrounds.

check this codepen: [http…](https://codepen.io/chrisdarroch/pen/wkeyga) seek and tell are still required.

see here: <https://docs.lvgl.io/latest/en/html/overview/file-system.html#use-drivers-for-images> Awesome Bump
Feature complete: Supports great features, such as the addition of grunge maps, supports tessellation, and has a beautiful 3d view port. | Free and open-source: Being open source, along with the price of nothing makes this software very compelling to use. | Confusing: The first few times using the software, you may have a hard time getting what you want. That is mostly due to the slew of features, and slightly confusing interface. | Cross platform: This software is cross platform, so you can integrate it into your work flow without worrying to much about your operating system (Linux, Mac, and Windows). | Requires open GL 3.30 or higher: Although the pbr view port looks great, it does come with the drawback that you will have to have support for open GL 3.30 or higher, and set it up before hand (if its not already set up on your computer). | Its not as easy as CrazyBump and Everything isnt labeled