What is a hybrid car?
A hybrid vehicle uses two or more distinct types of power. 


A petroleum-electric hybrid most commonly uses internal combustion engines (using a variety of fuels, generally gasoline or Diesel engines) and electric motors to power the vehicle. The energy is stored in the fuel of the internal combustion engine and an electric battery set.
the distance covered by a car in 5 h if it is moving with a speed of 75 km/h is\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_? hydrocarbons are the compounds of hydrogen and carbon. they are the simplest of all the organic compounds.hydrocarbons are of two types:(i) organic (ii) inorganic tenspeed
Try the 10-11 Mazda3, 09-11 Subaru Impreza, 07-09 VW Rabbit, 07-08Hyundai 
Sonata V6, 07 Mazda6,04-06 Nisson Altima, 05-06 Acura RSX, 05 Mustang V8, 05 
Subaru Impreza WRX/STi there are 3 types of hybridisation for carbon in organic compounds, sp, sp2 and sp3 depending on the number of sigma and pi bonds between the carbon atoms. more the ‘s’ character more is the electronegativity of the carbon as ‘s’ orbitals are closer to the nucleus, hence electrons held more closely. which company? "the vehicle identification number (vin) is how [car insurance companies](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance) determine trim level, and sometimes their systems aren't updated with the latest trim levels. however, most of the time they are so close that it **will not make a significant difference in the premium or claim payout.** 

to be on the safe side, let [state farm](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance/state-farm-car-insurance-quote) know about the problem and have the claim re-evaluated. if they ask for proof, you can send them a copy of the registration or a picture of the vin on the car. 

if you are concerned with your service from state farm, it may be time to find a new insurance provider. give the [jerry](https://getjerry.com/signup) app a try! jerry gathers competitive quotes from over 50 insurance companies for free."

**more**: [11 car insurance hacks to save you money](https://getjerry.com/car-insurance/car-insurance-hacks) Thank you, Thressa, for sharing this wonderful photo with the WikiTree community! Looks like about a 1964 Chevrolet in the background. let the speed of train = x km /hlet the speed of car = y km/hcase 1 : 120 km by train and 480 by cartime taken to travel 120 km by train = 120x hrstime taken to travel 120 km by car = 480x hrsaccording to first condition :120x + 480y = 8⇒1x + 4y = 115     
1case 2 : 200 km by train and 400 by cartime taken to travel 200 km by train = 200x hrstime taken to travel 400 km by car = 400x hrsaccording to second condition :    200x + 400y = 82060 = 813 = 253         as, 20 min = 2060 hr = 13 hr⇒1x + 2y = 124     
2subtracting 2 from 1, we get      2y = 115 - 124⇒2y = 8-5120⇒y = 80now, from 1, we get    1x + 480 = 115⇒1x = 11 - 120 = 160⇒x = 60so, speed of train = 60 km/hspeed of car = 80 km/h automatic is a bit better then mt these days for city driving and highways but a bit costlier and manual will be better on hillside only, against cvt. manual is evergreen if comfort can be compromised. Arthur C Clarke once observed that people get too optimistic about technological progress for the short run, and then too pessimistic for the long term. I think that is what has happened with this particular technology. When I was a kid, I watched the Jetsons a lot. In those days, the "future" was around 2000. That was when we were supposed to be living the Jetsons. Everyone would have their own rocket packs, with which we could zip around in, flying cars, robot maids, homes and offices in the sky that looked like the Space Needle.   

  

Ironically though, the Jetsons was not set in 2000, but in 2061. I think that's a good ballpark for when we'll have practical flying cars.   

  

If you think about it, we've had flying cars of a sort for some time now. It doesn't require any sort of special technology at the basic level. They're called helicopters. It is quite possible to build small inexpensive helicopters right now. It's not a question of technology really--it's more about regulation, licensing, safety, and infrastructure.   

  

I think driver-less technology, once it is perfected and demonstrated to be reliable in ordinary ground cars, will help clear the way for the first three objections. I imagine vehicles, approximately car sized, maybe a bit wider or taller, emerging from people's garages where the roof opens, not a door on the side. They might look hemispheric, two contra-rotating fan blades, negating the need for a tail, driven perhaps by an electric induction motor of sufficient power, similar to a Tesla. The blades and motor might be at the bottom, surrounded by a wire mesh, with a floor filled with Lithium batteries, maybe graphene batteries if someone finds a means to mass-produce that amazing material, and then the passengers on top of that, enclosed in a transparent dome, sitting on a ring of seats after they tell the car their destination.   

  

At first, they will be toys of the rich. People will be stuck in the horrible traffic on the highways, and look above longingly as the wealthy zip above them to their offices downtown. It will become a status symbol, and more and more people will buy them, and the cost will come down as manufacturers find ways to bring the costs down and mass produce more. New buildings and garages will gradually be designed to accommodate the new cars. It might be necessary for the new cars to be able to hover just a few feet off the ground so that they can enter existing garages, but eventually, as new buildings are designed and built, the garages might migrate to the tops of buildings, or perhaps a garage to the side where cars land on top, and are moved by elevator down to a parking spot.