HOW COME WOMEN CRY FOR EQUALITY AND YET WOMEN'S PRISONS ARE SO MORE RELAXED THAN MEN'S IN EVERY WAY, HAIR STRAIGHTENETRS FOR SHARED USE AND MAKE UP?



 Prison equality, whole point is to remove privileges until reformed suposedly
We can't actually live in an equality no matter what ink on paper says. The thing is that so long that there is a disparity between male and female rights groups representation there won't be equality.   
  
Normally you first do a cultural revolution and then turn the politics according to how the culture is.   
  
Lots of women's rights movements however are getting men's rights movements being liquidated by the government. Its a common tactic that leftist pressure groups do repeatedly.  
  
There is never going to be equality because politics is the very platform where groups in a given society go to represent their interests, and their interests alone. Feminists have fought for women's rights, now that they have it, they fight for women's interests.  
  
An activist group has only so much human and financial resources so they are putting them into strategic positions much like a military would do with their units. They use their movement's strong points on the weak points of the opponent, or the problem they want changed.  
  
Women's right advocates are invited to have a talk at the government, UN, universities, etc. Men's rights? lol nope.  
  
there's not going to be equality because the political environment doesn't actually serve the purpose for an equality to exist in strategic terms at least.
be irritated and raise your concerns. working moms would have more help if men were given more benefits. it's great for everyone. allow private companies to compete with all govenrment services. its that simple.

when a govenrment monopoly is in place, there is no reason or mechanism for the corruption to go away.

in a free market, corruption leads to losses, so it provides incentive for the business to fire and prosecute those who are corrupt.

take the government monopoly on police protection for example. what happens to police who do not respond to a robbery? what happens to reports of police beatings and theft? often nothing. there is no incentive for anything to be done. on the other hand, in a free market, every instance would be investigated and reparations paid for mistakes, else competition will have a chance of providing the service instead.

also consider this. government programs benefit from losses. it allows them to request budget increases, or power increases. inefficiency is rewarded in government, the opposite of what is rewarded in a free market. saying that, corruption assists government as it helps to drive up costs of operation.

*corruption in society is a problem? society, or the people do not have the power to imprison you, or tax you. you are not forced to fund private citizens who are 'corrupt'. hi maddie,the purpose of any manipulation is to convince another person that their previously held beliefs are incorrect. one example of a way to manipulate another person is through the practice of gaslighting. think of it as someone who continually turns down the lights in a room (turning down a gas lamp) but tells another person the light is constant, it's their perception or eyesight that is affected. the purpose of gaslighting is to convince another person that they are losing their sanity. how does this transform societal values? on a large scale, if you can convince a large number of people to change their values then society will inevitably shift in its core beliefs and practices. a positive example of this is the icelandic women's protest in 1975 when every woman in the country went on strike for one day. after this protest, women were given equal wages and equal rights under the law. though this strike was not manipulation but civil rights protest, you can see the impact of change on societal values. think about efforts to take away civil rights for one specific group of people: is the language used as a weapon? is it manipulative? deceptive? how would that impact independence and personal identities? if your civil rights were taken away, say your right to vote because of another person's manipulative argument, would you feel less independent? would you feel as though your voice mattered? would you feel more valued by society or less valued by society?good luck with your homework!jessica Because it empowers men. Keeps men from being the puppet and asking women for approval on being a man. MGTOW teaches men the dirty little secret about women and how they perpetrate a lie that insists that if you constantly give to women they will respect you... No, that's how you get used.   

  

MGTOW teaches men to think for themselves and nevermind what women think of them because women hate not being able to label a man and control him. thanks to MGTOW we now have a forum where we can join forces and choose to be her slave or be our own man and walk with our head high with pride... Even if that means being alone. i like my chances better than being with a woman who may be here to day and gone the next.   

  

i don't need women. i only need my wits. my pride opens more doors and has also illuminated my inner strength to resist the temptation of the dragon female and her puppet sorcery. democracy is more effective than its other alternatives:1. promotes equality: one of democracy’s underlying principles is equality among citizens. it tries to stop discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, region or sex.2. enhances dignity of the individual: democracy does not allow the dignity or the basic rights of a person to be violated.3. improves the quality of decision-making: since decision-making power is not concentrated in one hand, democracy ensures an unbiased system of checks and balances.explanation: democracy largely derives its power from the citizen itself. unlike other forms of government, it prioritizes the welfare of citizens through the citizens themselves. the “rule of law” states that everyone, regardless of any discrimination, is equal before the law. in an independent and democratic india, all citizens from a rickshaw puller to the prime minister are to be judged equally before the law if they violate it by committing a crime. every violation of a law or commitment of a criminal offense has a specific process to establish guilt and cite its punishment. the “rule of law” ensures that equality is maintained by passing the same judgment on a criminal regardless of his/her status or background.
violations of the “rule of law” are, sadly enough, aplenty in india. in our country, if one has power or “contacts” with influential people, then it is easy to get away with even gross violations of laws and rules. for example, most politicians today own property and wealth worth crores but they do not even file tax returns on the same. the assets they declare are probably not even half of what they originally own. however, an ordinary income tax official cannot dare to question them for fear of losing his job, because the former have “power” that this official does not possess. in order to have the election process more democratic there are few pre-requisites like:a. one vote, one value: to choose/elect the representative everyone must have one note with equal value. this is to avoid any type of conflicting situation.b. regular election: there should be regular elections in every democratic country so that people have their choice at regular intervals.c. free and fair election: in order to ensure a fair chance to the people there should be a free and fair election in every democratic country.d. political competition: in order to have democratic election parties, candidates should be free to contest elections and should offer some real choice to the voters. hey. this new generation can just get in line and wait your turn. my generation is still waiting for these exact same changes promised 30 years ago!

jimmy carter and a democratic administration are pledged to bring about the changes we need:

putting limits on how much the doctors and the hospitals can gouge medicare and medicaid and the public. nobody should have to pay $700 a day for a hospital room or $65 to walk into a doctor's office.

making the rich pay their fair share of taxes like everybody else.

the economy: to get the economy moving again by providing a job for every american who wants to work and by bringing inflation under control.\

energy: to establish a coherent energy policy, and to increase emphasis on coal production and increased research on renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind and geothermal. to lead in directing a voluntary conservation program.

welfare reform: to establish a streamlined, simplified welfare system with strong work incentives that promote family stability. to take those able to work out of the system and provide them job training and a job. to give those who cannot work because of age or disability nationwide, fairly uniform benefits varying only according to the cost of living from area to area.

environment: to maintain strong environmental protection laws. to protect against relaxation of our current standards for air quality, water quality or automotive emissions. to preserve the natural heritage of america, and to turn over to future generations a country that is environmentally sound.

education: to increase the federal share of the total cost of education. to assure that the average american family can afford to send their children to college.

agriculture: to develop an agriculture policy which insures farmers a predictable and fair return for their labor, yet is fair to the american consumer. to avoid the republican policy of embargoes on farm products, and aggressively develop our export markets abroad.

tax reform: to move toward a truly progressive and simplified tax system, with reduced tax rates for the average american.

elderly: to recognize that elderly constitute one of our most precious resources. to insure adequate income for retirement; to increase housing for the elderly. to relax mandatory retirement laws. to work or subsidies for reduced fare on public transportation for the elderly.

health care: to establish a comprehensive national health program which will make adequate health care a right for all people, be uniform in scope, and preserve the private relationship between doctor and patient.

defense: to guarantee the security of our nation -- a guarantee of freedom from the threat of successful attack or blackmail and the ability with our allies to maintain peace.

foreign policy: to stop treating our allies as if they were our adversaries. to make it clear that detente is a two-way street. to promote human rights abroad and to deal affirmatively with the social and economic problems of the developing world. to make our total commitment to the security of israel as a jewish state absolutely clear.



reorganization: to reorganize completely the executive branch of government, making it fair, efficient, effective and responsive to out people's needs.


http://www.4president.org/brochures/cart... it is a very personal decision. but don't be fooled by the anti-circumcision activists. the reality is:

"-- circumcised men say they experience greater sexual pleasure after surgery, a finding that should help overcome unease about the operation."

"a total of 87.7 per cent said they found it easier to reach an orgasm after being circumcised, and 92.3 per cent said they experienced more sexual pleasure." I'll assume you mean how much actual time would be served on a particular sentence... it starts with "good time credits" that are applied to the sentence calculator a the beginning of the sentence. An inmate can only lose that good time by having behavior issues or breaking numerous rules. In federal you get 15%, state prison ranges from 15-30% good time. The difference with the state is that they're also dealing with a parole system too that can release an offender having done only one-third of their sentence.