Confusing Arabic pronunciation



I have recently started to learn Arabic and I'm quite confused with some words and how to pronounce them. For example عِنْد ("have") should be pronounced as [ʕind] since the ´ below the ع is pronounced like an i. But when it's time to hear its sound the voice says [ʕand]. Why?


This happens also with other words like مُتَرجِم (translator), should be pronounced like [mutarʤim], (because تَ is [ta]) but all I hear is [muturʤim] and it sounds kind of senseless. I understand there are letters like ي or و with several possible sounds (ii, y) (uu, w), but I can't understand these kind of cases I just showed you.


Also I’ve seen things like يِّ, that as the theory says, should be pronounced as iiayii ([ii] from ي, [a] from ‘ and [yii] from the small w), but no, it is just [yii]. Where is this rule written in? Why is this pronounced as [yii] without any [a] sound if there is a ´ above the letter?


Therefore, after all these nonsense I’ve came to the conclussion that I have no chance but to try to learn the words as they’re written and pronounced instead of trying to understand its sounds, which would actually be the best way to learn. So if there was any native arab out there who could explain me these pronunciation rules (cause the theory just doesn’t say anything about this) I’d be more than grateful.
Rule No.1 on Duolingo-Arabic: Do not pay attention to the audio. Or rather, not much attention to the audio. I've been working on correcting some things for learners here who were misled big time by the audio.  

The audio here is mainly a speech machine or TTS. The speech machine is not adequate and makes a lot of mistakes (even grammatical-wise) and there are many words out there that do sound funny when the TTS spells them out. To add salt to the wound: Duolingo uses some words and expressions from dialects and mixes them up with MSA (or modern standard Arabic).
well, in a texting/typing situation you can't hear what that person is saying, but caps specify raised voices. if you are new to the internet, you should try doing a google search for "netiquette", it will help you get a general grasp of things. first of all learn to spell man

you just look stupid when you spell words like that

makes you look like a retard



and no i do not know of a place like that

just search aroung correct spelling for the english word "tanned" is [tˈand], [tˈand], [t\_ˈa\_n\_d]] (ipa phonetic alphabet) british english pronounces it with an /f/. american english doesn't. To make a Long O sound   

1.oa (eg.) goal,road,coal,\_toast\_,\_moan\_, \_toad, load,poach,roam,roar.   

2.oe (eg.)toe,Joe,hoe,\_\_floe\_\_\_,\_shoe\_\_\_,\_woe...   

  

To make a Long U sound   

1.ew (eg.)new,blew,screw,\_knew\_\_,\_\_flew\_\_\_\_,\_... drew\_\_   

2.ue (eg.) glue,blue,fuel,\_\_true\_\_\_\_,\_clue\_\_,\_cruel... fluent\_\_\_\_ yes i already tried the uff input order like i mentioned in my post.

in the end i just added an additional layer in my neural network to swap from channel-first, to channel-last after the input has been read so this issue can be closed. the reason they're different tenses is because each example has a different amount of certainty.

1. "biden said he would" this refers to an event in the future and the author is not sure if it will really happen or not.

2. "biden said he will" this refers to an event in the future the author thinks will happen

3. "fauci said it was safe" this shows no uncertainty. now, we don't know if fauci will say it's safe, but if he does say it's safe, then there will be no doubts about what he said. Definition used:  

Congruence.  

Let m be an integer greater than 1. If xand yare integers, then x is congruent to y modulo m if x — y is divisible by m. It can be represented as \(\displaystyle{x}={y}{\left({b}\ mod\ {m}\right)}\). This relation is called as congruence modulo m.  

Calculation:   

Consider the values and congruence classes modulo m,  

\(\displaystyle{\left[{13}\right]}^{{{6}}}\) and m = 15.  

It is evident that [x]=[y] if \(\displaystyle{\left[{x}={y}{\left({b}\ mod\ {m}\right)}\right]}\). Since \(\displaystyle{13}=-{2}{\left({b} \ mod \ {15}\right)}\).  

Then,  

[13]=[-2]  

\(\displaystyle{\left[{13}\right]}^{{{6}}}={\left[-{2}\right]}^{{{6}}}\)  

\(\displaystyle={\left[{\left(-{2}\right)}^{{{6}}}\right]}\)  

=[64]  

Since, by the principal or congruence \(\displaystyle{64}={4}{\left({b}\ mod \ {15}\right)}\). Therefore, \(\displaystyle{\left[{13}\right]}^{{{6}}}={\left[{4}\right]}\) in \(\displaystyle{Z}\_{{{15}}}\).  

Therefore, the value of the expression is [4]. in western music most songs are in major keys.  so normally the "major" does not have to be stated.  if it says only "key of e", the assumption is that it is e major.  they will always say "key of e minor" if they are referring to a minor key. correct spelling for the english word "receivers" is [ɹɪsˈiːvəz], [ɹɪsˈiːvəz], [ɹ\_ɪ\_s\_ˈiː\_v\_ə\_z]] (ipa phonetic alphabet)