haproxy monitoring
ubuntu 20.04

checkmk 2.0.0p4

we leverage haproxy in our environment a bit different than what check\_mk is expecting.

meaning, there will always be 1 or more backend servers in a down state and only 1 up. currently check\_mk sees these down states as a critical which isn’t really a problem as long …
imho the best solution is to put the proxy`s to an bi

[image]

[business intelligence (bi) - reduce complexity with bi](https://docs.checkmk.com/latest/en/bi.html)

complex relationships can be easily visualized with business intelligence (bi). learn step by step how to build bis – rule-based and dynamically.

…
sometimes one or both of these patches help, especially if the system is showing high ram and/or cpu usage when checking updates:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265




https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3102810﻿﻿
﻿ it is possible that responsiveness may suffer and customers needs may not be met within business timescalesleading the way in it testing and certification tools wwwtestkingcom filter at the backend server only? it looks like your intent is to use host networking, can you add

network\_mode: host

also you can try netstat -tupln | grep 32400

to see if you are listening on 32400 for plex hi and welcome!

it’s not an open ondemand thing. you need to setup sshd to allow for hostbasedauthentication and generate some key pairs. this setups some sort of trust between 2 or more servers saying “if you’ve logged into one of them, you can login to the other directly”.

of course we use lots… hi sheeeng.  thank you for reporting this to us.  we looked into that file and verified that there is a false detection indeed.  we have fixed this already and the fix should go out soon on the next database releases.

 

thank you again for you report! 

 

 

f-secure labs network monitor is the ideal tool for monitoring servers - it does everything real time and i think you likely need to just adjust your thresholds so you get less emails.
spiceworks inventory is not intended to be used for monitoring - you can do some aspects with it, but if you're looking for real time monitoring, you're probably best off finding another tool.  if you want to do asset management and keep an eye on the devices for things like disk space, then we're going to be a good fit.  for 500 workstations, if you can avoid using the agent and just directly scan them, you will be better off from a performance standpoint - assuming the environment is fairly consistent, once you figure out how to scan one workstation, those changes should likely apply to the rest (maybe via gpo).  
i hope this helps somewhat.
jackie. so philipp, just thank you!

hereby i can confirm that your check plugin officially works with vnxe! :tada:

perform the following steps to monitor vnxe with check\_mk:

search [dell.com/support](http://dell.com/support) for vnxe unisphere cli (linux 64-bit) and download it. copy the file to the check\_mk server that should m… Dear Jay Nelish


Your Question is incomplete


is the specific system is not on Network? its might be a problem discovered last year, that system ping but not share any data, or cannot access the system


you click on start menu and then click on run  

type serivces.msc  

and run the computer browser service, Remote Procedure call service, Server, and Client service


and your problem will resolved  

but actually this is because of virus change your antivirus program and scan your system wtih updated A/V i believe, and might double check this w support/sales engineers - in the situation you describe the vms would continue to functions/run (no outage of them executing/reading/writing to disk) however the cluster’s resiliency would stay critical (it doesn’t have enough pool capacity to write 2nd copies) until the storage heavy node is back up (i.e. couldn’t loose any additional disk/nodes/blocks).this is one of the reasons why storage-heavy nodes need to be added to a cluster in pairs, so storage un-balances during ha events don’t end up causing, “sufficient\_disk\_space\_check” warnings.note that the number of storage heavy nodes may need to be more if you’re using rf=3https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/kbs/details?targetid=ka0600000008gvycai