1. students protested the decision.
2. students protested against the 
decision.
3. students protested at the decision.
 
 does this sound natural?
the first one.
you can pick 1 senior in 5 ways, 1 junior in 4 ways, 1 sophomore in 3 ways and i freshman in 2 ways.
in all you can make these selections i 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 ways = 120 ways.
 
please note: selecting a committee is a "combination" problem, not a "permutation". discourage, oppose, dissuade, decrease, attack, protest, denounce, opponent, deny, block, frustrate, faultfinder, conceal, deter, counteract, disconcert, critic, protestor, disapprove, reject, opposition, baffle, hurt, hide, antagonist, hinder, refuse, condemn, assail, halt, assailant, expose, impede, undermine, confound, obstruct, criticize, prevent, impugn, adversary, enemy. dear student,

sel is an incorrect word kindly recheck the spelling and do get
back to us

regards a)
\(x^{2}-GOF\)
  

We are comparing observed values to expected values
  

b) Another test must be used Cholesterol level is quantitative and not a count.
  

c) \(x^{2}\) test for independence
Relation between political leaning and choice of major as with anything, depends on the girl. some like it, some tolerate it, some hate juniors. college students are classified the same as high school students. 1st year are freshman. 2nd year are sophomores. 3rd year are juniors, and 4th year are seniors. electoral college. trump lost the popular vote. out votes don’t matter because of the electoral college. he should have never won in the first place and the only way we can get him out is if the blue voter turnout is high enough to swing the electoral vote in favor of biden given : let a , b and c be three students whose chances of solving a problem is given i.e , p(a) = , p(b) = and p(c) = . p() = , p() = and p()= to find: the probability that the problem is solved .here , p(the problem is solved) = 1 - p(the problem is not solved)= 1- p( )= 1 – [p( ) p( ) p( )]= 1- []= 1 - = therefore , the probability that the problem is solved is . absolutely not. the proposal to abolish the electoral college is the horrid, but depressingly predictable, symptom of a populist age.populism is not a schematic philosophy but is rather an attitude toward culture and politics characterized by the veritable worship of "the common man," a distrust of elites, a wariness toward complexity and - significantly - a deep dislike of established institutions. (called these days, "the establishment" or "the swamp.") in this, then, the movement to abolish the electoral college is part of a larger current running through the society.indeed, at the same time that there have been calls to abolish the electoral college, there have also been calls to abolish the u. s. senate, or abolish the filibuster, to pack the supreme court (or limit the terms of justices or make other changes), to raise the voting age to 16 and in some cases to allow illegal immigrants to vote. what all of these have in common is that they take a torch to established institutions, particularly those institutions that put a break on the pure expression of the popular will.indeed, this is not just a phenomenon on the democratic side of the aisle at the moment. the republicans have been vocal in their attacks on the "media" - as if that were a single entity - and on silicon valley - which in the popular mode of the hour has discriminated and oppressed conservatives, it is alleged.most of all, republican who are feigning outrage over senator warren's call to abolish the electoral college are forgetting that one donald j. trump has advocated its abolition as well - at least until it helped him win. mr. trump - like all good populists - is no slave to consistency, after all.at any rate, abolition of the electoral college would be a horrid idea. it would effectively disenfranchise huge swaths of the country as both parties would camp out in california, new york, texas, florida and maybe ohio, leaving the rest of the country to itself. this would also very likely set the stage for the rise of regional parties, with all that would entail for the balkanization of the nation's politics.moreover, if the nation enjoyed the spectacle of the 2000 election, it should be prepared. in that year, the fight was over florida's electoral votes which confined the battle - as a legal and political matter - to the vote in one or two counties in that state. turn the battle into a nationwide popular vote and instantly the fight would move to the count in every close vote in every closely fought district across the country.there is irony in this. 2000 was effectively resolved by a ruling in the supreme court - that bastion of elitist judges and lawyers. abolish the electoral college and close votes across the country will invariably end up in the courts as a routine matter.the electoral college has served the nation well for over 200 years and such long established institutions deserve deference. their endurance certainly suggesting that they have worked as well as anything works in an imperfect world.wise societies realize that. which certainly suggests something about the state of american society. i entered with no major (the "no major" option in community college is "liberal arts"). then, i majored in film after finishing the gen ed courses and going to university. (yeah, i knew it was risky, but i figured i didn't want to regret what i chose in college and wanted a career i could enjoy more than a safe bet.) after six months, i realized that film school is very stupid. but also, they're full of super-woke lefties, so i got the f*ck outta there.i switched my major to english; which is a more employable, more broad version of the same thing. i always wanted to be a writer and producer (still do; honestly; i've written a lot and come up with many show ideas). you can get a job as an entertainment writer with an english degree, but also do so much more. i was wrongfully expelled from my first university and spent three years in a lawsuit against them, which messed up my rate of getting a degree by a lot. i had to start most of my classes all over again in a new university while waiting on the lawsuit. by the time the lawsuit settled out of court for a measly $43,000 (which had a stipulation in it that all of that had to go towards school and tuition; i couldn't get to keep anything for myself), i graduated, and went for my masters in english for another two years. i only just got my masters in may of 2019. so i switched my major twice. now i'm a teacher in korea with a masters in english. i don't regret it, but the unjustified expulsion and lawsuit really f*cked up my path in life by three years.