what is canonical tag in seo ?
what is canonical tag in seo ?
there is another related topic here: [add option to set canonical\_url to embed\_url](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-option-to-set-canonical-url-to-embed-url/103915). if what you are wanting is to have the canonical url of the discourse topic set to the url of the embedded blog post, it would be best to continue that discussion.

i think the biggest issue with implementing this is … <p>a h1 tag is still the recommended way by w3 to headline a page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/qa/tips/use\_h1\_for\_title">http://www.w3.org/qa/tips/use\_h1\_for\_title</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/qa/tips/headings">http://www.w3.org/qa/tips/headings</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-html40/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5">http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-html40/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5</a></p>
<p>i still find that by following w3 recommendations it makes a good step in creating a well optimised page. obviously you aren't going to rank by having a h1 tag alone, but it will always never harm the page to have a well crafted one. one thing i do recommend is having a different h1 tag to the page title.</p> <p>hi alex - have you considered using a format such as this for your title tags -</p>
<p>word | brand name</p>
<p>however to actually answer your question it is fine to use hyphens i have several well ranked pages that use a hyphen in the title tag and this has not caused me any issues - out ranking sites that don't use the hyphen format. the thing i would think about though is having your brand regularly coming before anything else in the title tag that's why i suggested the format above - just a suggestion. you can still rank well for branded keywords with your brand being second in the title tag order.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p> You need to style the <a> tag font color. By default, linked text is blue and underlined. just adding some keywords to make this tool easier to locate via forum search: unichar, arrow, triangle, circle, stop sign maybe by using the [token length filter](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/analysis-length-tokenfilter.html) in an analyzer config? Okay well if those query parameters really do represent arbitrary text a visitor enters into fields, then personally I would push them to separate Adobe Analytics variables instead of concatenate them, because there's no guarantee on how many characters they will be or what characters will be entered. 

I'm not sure I understand what you mean... is your site just using different query parameters for search terms, depending on the page or search widget used? So e.g. maybe you do a search and it pops k=[search term] but on search results page you do another search and it instead pops query=[new search term] ?  If so, then it sounds to me like you shouldn't concat them, but instead just look for either one and push to the variable.  

Or is it that a visitor can go to your site and search for something that results in both of those parameters showing up in the URL at the same time, with different values? 

I think I need clarification about how your site actually works vs. these two parameters. 




[View solution in original post](/t5/dynamic-tag-management-questions/internal-search-term-tracking/m-p/278167#M1141) Yes - the strategy is that Google's algorithms put less weight toward linkbuilding and more toward content considered "useful" by users. You should focus in investing in unique content that encourages visitors to share your links via social media and other sources, as opposed to straight old link building. If you diversify your site portfolio you wil encourage more long term growth and remain safe in SEO listings. Whew. Lot of topics in that short post!

First, the <Art>/Article tag is a container/grouping tag that wraps around a bunch of content tags (like <P>, <H2>, <L>, <Table>) to create a logical area of the larger document.

<Art> tags are created for each story/article dragged into the Articles Panel. How you group your stories is up to you. Some examples:

* If it's a small document, like a fact sheet or brochure, then 1 <Art> in the PDF might be sufficient for the whole document.
* If it's a 10-chapter book, then each chapter could be a separate <Art>, and there would be 10 (or more) <Art> tags in the entire PDF.
* A magazine would have 1 <Art> tag for each feature story.

 

Quote: "*Any other accessibility tips would be greatly appreciated*"

 

Ha ha! That's like asking how to use Photoshop in a little post in this forum. Accessibility is an extremely broad, but specific, requirement and you really need formal training in how to do it with InDesign. Look for classes from:

* Chad Chelius at LinkedIn Learning
* CreativePro's InDesign Accessibility Summit <https://creativepro.com/indesign-accessibility-summit/>
* Bevi Chagnon at [www.PubCom.com/classes](http://www.PubCom.com/classes)

 



 Design + Accessibility | Author | Designer | Programmer | Trainer <p>we use bazaavoice for the reviews on our site, and it's a solid service. if you are using an older version of bv reviews, then you definitely want to move over to cloud seo because those are generated through server side scripting instead of using iframes like the old implementation.</p>