Defragmenting hard drive on Windows Server 2003




 When does a hard drive on a hardly used Windows 2003 server need to be de-fragmented? The server is a file server and has files written and removed from it several times a week and is accessed by ~25 users. Can we set an alert when we hit a hard fragmentation level?
You can use third party defragmentation tools that have central management consoles to manage the tools, monitor systems and report on fragmentation levels. These tools have the ability to start defragmentation based on a schedule or a fragmentation threshold level (tool dependent). What they also do well is provide reporting on how things are going on the systems you monitor fragmentation wise.


Here is a comparison page for some of the major defragmentation applications:  

[Comparison of defragmentation software](http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_defragmentation_software)


The big three from when I did some research several years ago:  

PerfectDisk  

O&O Defrag  

Diskeeper


Keep in mind that Windows includes basic defragmentation. You can schedule this using TaskSchedule. Basic defragmentation does not defragment page files, hyberfiles and the like. There are some other free tools available that can do various items like page files. This all requires you to piece together and and devise your own monitoring. If you need reporting and monitoring purchasing it is always simpler.


If you can justify the cost of a managed defragmentation program, these will all do a good job. Test each to see how they impact system performance in your environment while defragmenting as well as their management and reporting capabilities.


  

First, don’t wait for your hard disk drive to be hardly used before defragging it. You have to maintain a certain defragmentation period as part of the computer hardware maintenance for your computer system.
not very hard to tell, you have one with a caution so that is a good sign there is an issue with the drive. 

does not mean you need to replace it right away, that is what backups are for. use the drive, if it fails replace it and restore from backup. or contact the drive vendor support and see what their criteria for a warranty replacement is, do the same thing if they exchange it, restore from backup. if you don't have backups today is a good time to start. thanks guys for your advice.

the problem was the order which i was doing things in. it was much simpler than everything i posted before. i summarize it all for everybody wanting to remove swap partition after upgrading to fedora 33.

boot up your computer normally.

disable swap partition:

# swapo… hey veryam,

that information is not persisted in the database. room activity is something that changes a lot and keeping it in the database is not an optimal solution. moreover, if a server goes down then nobody will be in the room thus the database would have incorrect information. therefore, it m… Hi,
  

  
Try to use HDD Regenerator, it is free for the first bad sector, sometimes that happen due to hard drive failure in the PCB (board) or due to excessive heat inside the laptop and it damage the disk, I had a lot of clients with this problem and unfortunately the most of the times, we can not recover nothing because the surface of the hard disk is really damaged, I expect you can solve your problem. 
  

  
Andro Jesus.
  
<https://www.mileniumcomputers.com/> [The /2/sharing/remove\_folder\_member endpoint](https://www.dropbox.com/developers/documentation/http/documentation#sharing-remove_folder_member) (or corresponding native method) would be the right way to remove a member from a folder, whether or not they've mounted it. (Or, if operating on the recipient themselves, [/2/sharing/relinquish\_folder\_membership](https://www.dropbox.com/developers/documentation/http/documentation#sharing-relinquish_folder_membership).)


That 'no\_explicit\_access' error should indicate "The target member only has inherited access to the shared folder". For example, they only have access by virtue of having access to a higher level folder, meaning you can't remove just the lower folder.


Can you print out the full error object/message? The nested `MemberAccessLevelResult` may contain more useful information.


If that doesn't seem to be the case though, please share some sample calls that produce this unexpected error though so we can look into it.


Also, sharing individual files is a different piece of functionality than sharing folders, and sharing individual files does only support view-only access. For that, you can add members to files using [/2/sharing/add\_file\_member](https://www.dropbox.com/developers/documentation/http/documentation#sharing-add_file_member), and remove them using [/2/sharing/remove\_file\_member\_2](https://www.dropbox.com/developers/documentation/http/documentation#sharing-remove_file_member_2). 




[View solution in original post](/t5/Dropbox-API-Support-Feedback/Remove-Shared-Folder-Invitee/m-p/371583#M20937) sometimes one or both of these patches help, especially if the system is showing high ram and/or cpu usage when checking updates:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265




https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3102810﻿﻿
﻿ okay, i got it.

this was a server i couldn’t install nscp on, because i got a notification from the msi installer that the system needs a reboot. since this is an important server and i had no downtime, i skipped the installation due to not having any nscp check back then anyway.

today i finally m… What is Delayed Branching ?
  

One way to maximize the use of the pipeline, is to find an instruction that can be safely exeucted whether the branch is taken or not, and execute that instruction. So, when a branch instruction is encountered, the hardware puts the instruction following the branch into the pipe and begins executing it, just as in predict-not-taken. However, unlike in predict-not-taken, we do not need to worry about whether the branch is taken or not, we do not need to clear the pipe because no matter whether the branch is taken or not, we know the instruction is safe to execute.
  

More Read : <https://www.cs.umd.edu/class/fall2001/cmsc411/projects/branches/delay.html>
  

Moving $I\_1$ after branch


* $I1$ is updating the value of  $R2$
* $R2$ which is used to determine branch condition $R1$
* Value of $R2$ is available after branch
  

$\Rightarrow$ `Cannot be moved`


Moving $I\_3$ after branch


* value of $R1$ is computed in this instruction
* $R1$ is the branch condition
  

$\Rightarrow$ `Cannot be moved`


Moving $I\_4$ after branch


* $I4$ is simple store instruction used to store R1 in memory
* program execution will have no effect if this is placed after conditional branch
  

$\Rightarrow$ `Can be moved`


Moving $I\_2$ after branch


* It update the memory location to place the storing of conditional branch instruction $R1$
* If moved after branch , when compiler reaches $I4$ program execution will stop
  

$\Rightarrow $ `Cannot be moved`


Hence, **option D is answer.** > 
> how can I detect when these threads are done with their job and dispose them of their resources?
> 
> 
> 


I think the `ThreadState` property will tell you want you need to know. ece 371 microcontroller interfacing paper the description  of   “debouncing” name: haomeng sang date: march 8, 2015 what is debounce and why use it? normally, key switch usually used for mechanical elastic switch, when the mechanical  contact is open or closed, due to the elasticity of the mechanical contacts, a key switch  when closed will not immediately be stably turned on and during disconnection does not suddenly disconnected. thus at the closed and disconnected moment are accompanied by a series of jitter. jitter is determined by the length of time of the mechanical  properties of the keys. key jitter can lead to misread a button repeatedly. to ensure that the cpu is only  closed once