what is best laptop color?
rose gold, fully black. ❤👌
just normal use may be a bit of light to mid gaming and small projects with photoshop i also want to try and work with adobe video editors i'm a student after all

honestly, all of these laptops are really just designed for web browsing and office. none of them are going to be able to play current aaa games. some indie games, but not current high end games. 

i would go with this one:

hp i5-7200u 8gb ddr4 1tb amd radeon r7 m440 4gb ddr3 760.52 usd

mainly, they are all about the same and it is cheaper. but this one has enough ram and dedicated gpu to do some light gaming. the 7500u model just has a higher clock cpu, it is not worth an extra $120. it is a dual core cpu, so video editing will be a challenge.

the 8250u is a 4 core/8 thread cpu. but with integrated graphics and 4gb of ram, those will be your bottlnecks in most cases. the extra threads will help with video editing, over the other cpus, but you may have issues due to limited ram. from what i have seen with the history of their device selection that i remember what you see is what you get. if they only offer one color they'll only ever offer one color. how about antec ne550m?


for many pcs, yes. for one in which you invested in a modern ryzen platform and a 2060? no.

you're cutting corners in the wrong place. for these specs, tier b on our housed psu tier list is the minimum i'd be comfortable with. it's really weird to pay extra to go from a 3600 to a 3600x -- or as steve burke noted in his review, you're paying $50 for a letter -- and then use an old, group-regulated psu.

https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/psu-tier-list-psucultists.3624094/ > 
> But how is this achieved?
> 
> 
> 


The system is not perfect. I personally do not like a lot of dumb decisions they made. But the basic idea is that they have:


* A catalog of consistent **printed** colors.
* A set of base colors and the **formulas** to achive the derivated colors.
* The base colors have some **specific values on colorimetry** that are repeatable by diferent manufacturers of inks.



> 
> I assume there are no "Pantone Inks", right?
> 
> 
> 


Yes and no. **Pantone is the system** to have a consistent color. Then, diferent **ink manufacturers** make a set of base inks based on the specifications.


So a manufacturer "HappyInks Inc." make an ink, for example "Pantone Reflex Blue"


**Printers** then go to the formula guide to find the recipy for the colors on the catalog, and go and buy from "Happy Inks" the basic set of colors.


They combine "Pantone Reflex Blue" with "Pantone Sunrise Yellow" in some specified proportions (from the pantone formula guide) to achive "Green XXXc".


If you are going to need a lot of ink of one specific color, the printer do not mix the base inks themselves, but ask for "Happy Inks" to make them some kilos of the ink (based, again on the pantone specifications).


The quality of diferent brands can be more or less accurate. Besides that some characteristics of inks can differ because some could be oriented to silk print, or textiles etc.



> 
> the printer needs in RGB.
> 
> 
> 


This is a biiiiiig mistake.


RGB is not by any means an acurate color reference. Either your printer is lazy or he is simply using some kind of digital print (but still is ignorant(*).


You need to include a RGB profile. Either sRGB or Adobe 1998 but you need to design using a CMYK profile, which obviously you do not have. So ask for which one is more suitable for that.


If they have no idea or say something like "It does not matter" use one according to your location. SWOP 2, Fogra, Gracol, etc.



> 
> Will the colours vary too much if using a Pantone - RGB convertor?
> 
> 
> 


If the project is on flat inks, the proper step would be that you deliver a project in Pantone and let them do the conversions, so they are responsable to match the color the best way possible.


This is why I say they are Ignorant. (*) They ignore what is the calibration of their own machine. They should profile it and give you some clues on what "generic profile" suits them the most.



> 
> textile print
> 
> 
> 


This does not say much. Are you printing rolls and rolls of fabric? Are you printing a Tshirt on a digital medium, like a logo for a student party? Are you using silk print for the campain for a company?


**An Aditional note**



> 
> will the colours vary too much
> 
> 
> 


Colors vary for a looooooooot of reasons.


My clasic example, grab a water based cyan marker. You have a specific ink one and only one.


Now go an paint everywhere you want. A news paper, a magazine, a window, a white towel, toilet paper, your hand.


See? The exact same ink vary a lot. This is why you must have an output color profile, so this gives the internal conversions and calculations to have the most acurate color possible due this combination of factors, which color on which medium.


This is why the printer should be responsable for the color conversions.


**Aditional Note 2**


There are some conversions from pantone to cmyk and rgb... Ouch.


This are very specific conversions. On some "ideal" situations.


More or less how an ink will be printed following exact specifications, for example a CMYK: type of paper, type of inks, controlled ammount of them (densitometry), etc.


For an RGB one they assume a calibrated monitor, Correct gamma, correct temperature, sRGB profile. But again this rgb simulation is for output for a web page for example, not as a printable file.


Spot color (Pantone), or Color selection (CMYK)



Depending on the type of design you have the choice to print in either of this 2 color modes.


For example, a design with gradients and diferent colors most likely needs to be printed in color selection.


But some other type of design needs to be printed with spot inks, or direct colors, this reduces costs and aditionally allow the colors to be consistent


[![](https://otake.com.mx/Foros/Directa.jpg)](https://otake.com.mx/Foros/Directa.jpg) hello, thank you for the screenshot.

you can change that color in dashboard → appearance → customize → colors section, header text option.

please feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.

kind regards, roman. > 
> 
> | [meljtabb](/adobe-users/10558700) wrote:I'm not sure if this is a color space issue or a calibration issue or something else entirely.  |
> 
> 

You seem to be using the Windows Photos App, which is not color managed, and will not display correct colors.

Lightroom is color managed, and will display correct colors, as long as the monitor profile is correct.

This difference in color is more pronounced if you have wide gamut monitor, in which case you have to use only color managed applications to view your work.

Bridge and [Irfanview](http://www.irfanview.com/) are both free and color managed (you have to enable color management under Settings in Irfanview).

On Windows 10, the Windows Photo Viewer is apparently still color managed, but it's hidden somewhere. Do a search for it.

A paid option is the latest version of ACDSee (20).


> 
> 
> | My camera (Nikon D750) is set to sRGB |
> 
> 

The color space you set in the camera only affects jpgs (and the jpg embedded in the raw files), if you shoot raw, it doesn't matter which color space you choose. Then it shouldn’t be a problem to set the InDesign Transparency Blend Space to RGB. Also when you export for screens don’t use a PDF/X preset, they are designed for press output. Use the Export Output tab to convert the ID doc to sRGB.


 


CMYK Blend Space:


 


![Screen Shot 10.png](https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/150842iD57F1CC3C78841C4/image-size/large?v=1.0&px=999 "Screen Shot 10.png")


 


RGB Blend Space:


![Screen Shot 11.png](https://community.adobe.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/150843i56A067219BAD62EE/image-size/large?v=1.0&px=999 "Screen Shot 11.png") neither of them. much higher specs than you actually need. core i3 with 8 gb ddr ram and an ssd hd all for less than $500 should be more than enough for your uses. if you need osx get a mac. getting osx on a pc is very hard and/or illegal. it will also not run as well as it will on a real mac. so my vote is for the macbook pro. Hi,
  

  
Try to use HDD Regenerator, it is free for the first bad sector, sometimes that happen due to hard drive failure in the PCB (board) or due to excessive heat inside the laptop and it damage the disk, I had a lot of clients with this problem and unfortunately the most of the times, we can not recover nothing because the surface of the hard disk is really damaged, I expect you can solve your problem. 
  

  
Andro Jesus.
  
<https://www.mileniumcomputers.com/>