match the pairs: - amalgamation
match the pairs: column a column b (1) no-new company is formed. (a) purchase method (2) 'goodwill or capital reserv (b) transferred to realisation a/c (3) scheme of amalgamation (c) absorption (4) transferer company (d) reqires approval of high court (5) profit on realisation (e) to be liquidated
column a answer (1) no-new company is formed. (c) absorption (2) 'goodwill or capital reserv (a) purchase method. (3) scheme of amalgamation (d) reqires approval of high court (4) transferer company (e) to be liquidated (5) profit on realisation (b) transferred to realisation a/c
it's not clear what it is you want as an output. if it's a row vector, there's no concatenation involved, you just simply reshape your matrix:
a = [0 1 1 1;
 1 0 1 0;
 1 0 0 1]
 v = reshape(a, 1, []) %reshape a into one row. since matlab is column major, this is done column-wise Assuming you're joining on columns with no duplicates, which is a very common case:

* An inner join of A and B gives the result of A intersect B, i.e. the inner part of a [Venn diagram](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram) intersection.
* An outer join of A and B gives the results of A union B, i.e. the outer parts of a Venn diagram union.

**Examples**

Suppose you have two tables, with a single column each, and data as follows:


```
A    B
-    -
1    3
2    4
3    5
4    6

```
Note that (1,2) are unique to A, (3,4) are common, and (5,6) are unique to B.

**Inner join**

An inner join using either of the equivalent queries gives the intersection of the two tables, i.e. the two rows they have in common.


```
select * from a INNER JOIN b on a.a = b.b;
select a.*, b.*  from a,b where a.a = b.b;

a | b
--+--
3 | 3
4 | 4

```
**Left outer join**

A left outer join will give all rows in A, plus any common rows in B.


```
select * from a LEFT OUTER JOIN b on a.a = b.b;
select a.*, b.*  from a,b where a.a = b.b(+);

a |  b
--+
1 | null
2 | null
3 |    3
4 |    4

```
**Right outer join**

A right outer join will give all rows in B, plus any common rows in A.


```
select * from a RIGHT OUTER JOIN b on a.a = b.b;
select a.*, b.*  from a,b where a.a(+) = b.b;

a    |  b
+
3    |  3
4    |  4
null |  5
null |  6

```
**Full outer join**

A full outer join will give you the union of A and B, i.e. all the rows in A and all the rows in B. If something in A doesn't have a corresponding datum in B, then the B portion is null, and vice versa.


```
select * from a FULL OUTER JOIN b on a.a = b.b;

 a   |  b
+
   1 | null
   2 | null
   3 |    3
   4 |    4
null |    6
null |    5

``` Fusion is the **noun form** of Fuse.


Usage is the **noun form** of Use.


Correct option: A associative law of addition:
a + (b+c) = (a+b) + c

commutative law of addition:
a + b = b + a

additive inverse:
a + (-a) = 0

zero property:
a + 0 = a

subtraction is basically the same thing as addition.
a - b = a + (-b)
instead of subtracting b, you add its additive inverse. in a perfectly competitive firm, ar is constant due to this, mr
is also constant and is equal to ar
in a monopoly firm, ar is reducing due to this, mr must also be
decreasing but faster than ar this is why mr is always less than ar
in non-competitive markets nothing missing - just different:

1.  transfers are still linked.  enter one side of the transfer and in the category drop-down, select transfer > [other account].  changing either of the two entries modifies the other.

2.  multiple registers at the same time.  you can have every register open at once in its own window.  only one register at a time shows in the main window.  just double-click the account in the left panel to open a floating register window.

3.  move transactions between accounts.  with both registers displayed, drag the transaction from one to the other.  if it is a downloaded transaction, you'll get a warning.  you cannot, however, move transactions between investment accounts. Hi


In **consulting interviews** you may have **two types of M&A cases:**


1. Commercial due-diligence of the target company
2. Synergies calculation of two merging companies


There are **two ways to identify the exact type of a case:**


* The interviewer will tell you
* In the beginning, while asking clarifying questions you ask what is the objective and if we have any other company in the portfolio that can have potential synergies


**1. For commercial DD** you can use the following structure:


**Market**


* Size
* Growth rates
* Profitability
* Segments
* Distribution channels


**Competition**


* Market shares of competitors and their segments (see the next point)
* Concentration / fragmentation (Fragmented market with lots of small players is less mature and easier to enter from a scratch. Concentrated market is hard to enter but has potential acquisition targets)
* Unit economics of the players (Margins, relative cost position)
* Key capabilities of the players (e.g. suppliers, assets, IP, etc)


**Company** 


* Unit economics (Margins, costs) in current or target markets
* Brand
* Product mix
* Key capabilities


**Feasibility of exit**:


* Exit multiples
* Exit time
* Existence of buyers


**2. For Synergies Calculation** you can use the following structure:


1. **Revenue synergies** - here you calculate the synergies in price and quantity (depending on the case it may be new geographies, new products, new distribution channels, bigger share on shelves crosselling opportunities, etc.)
2. **Cost synergies** - typically you use a value chain structure tailored to the industry (e.g. supply-production-distribution-marketing-after sales support)
3. **Risks** - major risks that can decrease the synergies (tip: don't underestimate the merging companies culture factor)
4. **Total synergies potential** in $, adjusted by risk (probability of failure)


**In private equity interviews,** the cases will be much more detailed in financial part. Depending on the company you'll need to:


* Find the relevant information in P&L and Balance sheet
* Do the simplified valuation using NPV: calculate cash flows and make assumptions about growth rate and discount rate
* Do the valuation using comps - you'll have to explain which comps you will use and why


Good luck! we are being asked to classify the following reactions based on the following categories:combination/synthesis → multiple reactants combine to form a single productw/o change in oxidation numbersa + b → abdecomposition →reactant splits into multiple products with no change in oxidation numbersab → a + bcombustion reaction: reaction with oxygen that produces carbon dioxide and waterhydrocarbon + o2 → co2 + h2osingle displacement →single element displaces another element in a compoundab + c → ac + b[readmore]let’s analyze the given reactionsa. fe2(co3)2 (s) → fe2o3(s) + 2co2(g) break down of fe2(co3)2(s) to its component ions → decomposition reactionanswer: this is a decomposition reaction.b. 2 c6h11oh(l) + 17 o2(g) → 12co2 (g) + 12h2o(l) reaction with oxygen that produces carbon dioxide and water → combustion reactionanswer: this is a combustion reaction.c. p4o10(s) + 6h2o(l) → 4h3po4(aq) two or more substances combine to form a single compound → combination reactionanswer: this is a combination reaction.d. 2c(s) + mno2(s) → mn(s) + 2co(g) substitute one element for another element in a compound →single-displacement reaction answer: this is a single-displacement reactione. 2naclo3 (s) → 2nacl(s) + 3o2(g)break down of compound into its simpler substances → decomposition reactionanswer: this is a decomposition reaction direction: a word and number arrangement machine when given an input line of word and numbers rearranges them following a particular rule in each step. the following is an illustration of input and rearrangement. input: politics 61 policy 116 partner 93 role 45 clear 27 38 point step i: role politics policy 116 partner 93 45 clear 27 38 point 61 step ii: role clear politics policy partner 93 45 27 38 point 116 61 step iii: role clear partner politics policy 93 45 38 point 27 116 61 step iv: role clear partner politics policy 93 38 point 45 27 116 61 step v: role clear partner politics point policy 93 38 45 27 116 61 step v, is the last step of the above arrangement as the intended arrangement is obtained. as per the rule followed in the given steps find out the appropriate steps for the given input. input: energy 54 78 place 23 issue 211 145 flat rent taxi 17in step iii, what is the difference between fifth element from left and second element from right? a) van der waals (present, all molecule/atoms contain it)[readmore](b) dipole-dipole (present, c=o creates a partial charge on c and o)(c) hydrogen bonding (not present, h-bonds are only present in compounds with h attached on o, n or f)(d) ion-ion (not present, only appears on compound with full charges)