i was told that only 13 people went to prison over the iran contra affair?
where can i find out if my boyfriend is telling me the truth that he was one of them? he is a felon released in 1999 and i have located his inmate number but no information on his case.
my guess is that he is full of sh*t!

after independent counsel lawrence e. walsh's appointment in december 1986, 14 persons were charged with criminal offenses. eleven persons were convicted, but two convictions were overturned on appeal. two persons were pardoned before trial and one case was dismissed when the bush administration declined to declassify information necessary for trial. on december 24, 1992, president bush pardoned caspar w. weinberger, duane r. clarridge, clair e. george, elliott abrams, alan d. fiers, jr., and robert c. mcfarlane. 

completed trials and pleas 


elliott abrams -- pleaded guilty october 7, 1991, to two misdemeanor charges of withholding information from congress about secret government efforts to support the nicaraguan contra rebels during a ban on such aid. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced abrams november 15, 1991, to two years probation and 100 hours community service. abrams was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

carl r. channell -- pleaded guilty april 29, 1987, to one felony count of conspiracy to defraud the united states. u.s. district judge stanley s. harris sentenced channell on july 7, 1989, to two years probation. 

thomas g. clines -- indicted february 22, 1990, on four felony counts of underreporting his earnings to the irs in the 1985 and 1986 tax years; and falsely stating on his 1985 and 1986 tax returns that he had no foreign financial accounts. on september 18, 1990, clines was found guilty of all charges. u.s. district judge norman p. ramsey in baltimore, md., on december 13, 1990, sentenced clines to 16 months in prison and $40,000 in fines. he was ordered to pay the cost of the prosecution. the fourth circuit u.s. court of appeals in richmond, va., on february 27, 1992, upheld the convictions. clines served his prison sentence. 

alan d. fiers, jr. -- pleaded guilty july 9, 1991, to two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from congress about secret efforts to aid the nicaraguan contras. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced fiers january 31, 1992, to one year probation and 100 hours community service. fiers was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

clair e. george -- indicted september 6, 1991, on 10 counts of perjury, false statements and obstruction in connection with congressional and grand jury investigations. george's trial on nine counts ended in a mistrial on august 26, 1992. following a second trial on seven counts, george was found guilty december 9, 1992, of two felony charges of false statements and perjury before congress. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge royce c. lamberth set sentencing for february 18, 1993. george was pardoned on december 24, 1992, before sentencing occurred. 

albert hakim -- pleaded guilty november 21, 1989, to a misdemeanor of supplementing the salary of oliver l. north. lake resources inc., in which hakim was the principal shareholder, pleaded guilty to a corporate felony of theft of government property in diverting iran arms sales proceeds to the nicaraguan contras and other activities. hakim was sentenced by u.s. district judge gerhard a. gesell on february 1, 1990, to two years probation and a $5,000 fine; lake resources was ordered dissolved. 

robert c. mcfarlane -- pleaded guilty march 11, 1988, to four misdemeanor counts of withholding information from congress. u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., sentenced mcfarlane on march 3, 1989, to two years probation, $20,000 in fines and 200 hours community service. mcfarlane was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

richard r. miller -- pleaded guilty may 6, 1987, to one felony count of conspiracy to defraud the united states. u.s. district judge stanley s. harris sentenced miller on july 6, 1989, to two years probation and 120 hours of community service. 

oliver l. north -- indicted march 16, 1988, on 16 felony counts. after standing trial on 12, north was convicted may 4, 1989 of three charges: accepting an illegal gratuity, aiding and abetting in the obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and destruction of documents. he was sentenced by u.s. district judge gerhard a. gesell on july 5, 1989, to a three-year suspended prison term, two years probation, $150,000 in fines and 1,200 hours community service. a three-judge appeals panel on july 20, 1990, vacated north's conviction for further proceedings to determine whether his immunized testimony influenced witnesses in the trial. the supreme court declined to review the case. judge gesell dismissed the case september 16, 1991, after hearings on the immunity issue, on the motion of independent counsel. 

john m. poindexter -- indicted march 16, 1988, on seven felony charges. after standing trial on five charges, poindexter was found guilty april 7, 1990, on all counts: conspiracy (obstruction of inquiries and proceedings, false statements, falsification, destruction and removal of documents); two counts of obstruction of congress and two counts of false statements. u.s. district judge harold h. greene sentenced poindexter june 11, 1990, to six months in prison on each count, to be served concurrently. a three-judge appeals panel on november 15, 1991, reversed the convictions on the ground that poindexter's immunized testimony may have influenced the trial testimony of witnesses. the supreme court on december 7, 1992, declined to review the case. in 1993, the indictment was dismissed on the motion of independent counsel. 

richard v. secord -- indicted march 16, 1988 on six felony charges. on may 11, 1989, a second indictment was issued charging nine counts of impeding and obstructing the select iran/contra committees. secord was scheduled to stand trial on 12 charges. he pleaded guilty november 8, 1989, to one felony count of false statements to congress. secord was sentenced by u.s. district chief judge aubrey e. robinson, jr., on january 24, 1990, to two years probation. 

pre-trial pardons 


duane r. clarridge -- indicted november 26, 1991, on seven counts of perjury and false statements about a secret shipment of u.s. hawk missiles to iran. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge harold h. greene set a march 15, 1993, trial date. clarridge was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

caspar w. weinberger -- indicted june 16, 1992, on five counts of obstruction, perjury and false statements in connection with congressional and independent counsel investigations of iran/ contra. on september 29, the obstruction count was dismissed. on october 30, a second indictment was issued, charging one false statement count. the second indictment was dismissed december 11, leaving four counts remaining. the maximum penalty for each count was five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. u.s. district judge thomas f. hogan set a january 5, 1993, trial date. weinberger was pardoned december 24, 1992. 

dismissal 


joseph f. fernandez -- indicted june 20, 1988 on five counts of conspiracy to defraud the united states, obstructing the inquiry of the tower commission and making false statements to government agencies. the case was dismissed in the district of columbia for venue reasons on the motion of independent counsel. a four-count indictment was issued in the eastern district of virginia on april 24, 1989. u.s. district judge claude m. hilton dismissed the four-count case november 24, 1989, after attorney general richard thornburgh blocked the disclosure of classified information ruled relevant to the defense. the u.s. court of appeals for the fourth circuit in richmond, va., on september 6, 1990, upheld judge hilton's rulings under the classified information procedures act (cipa). on october 12, 1990, the attorney general filed a final declaration that he would not disclose the classified information.
Tough to say without knowing more. They could have re-indicted your case or it could be on an arraignment calendar just to keep track of the case since it is so old. If you have a lawyer, he or she should be able to tell you what is going on. is that why you broke up? who knows why he's doing that He works for a private defense contractor, and the state!?


Why would his employers be the slightest bit interested in a squabble between exes? 


More importantly, why are you interested, and why would this person's employers have give you the time of day? From what you say here, you have no evidence nothing but idle gossip and unsubstantiated accusations.


Best if you stay out of it and mind your own business--that way you do not become involved in something you have no business being involved with.


Let your friend take appropriate steps with the authorities or with the website owners themselves to secure his/her social networking access. they were probably looking at your profile to "check up" on youim ashamed to admit it but i did it with my ex and immediately regretted it, i re-blocked him as soon as i could tho, so i guess check to see if they reblock you in 48 hours and that will be a dead giveaway that they just reblocked you to check up on you A friend of mine was arrested for possessing, distributing and producing child pornography. His 5 year old step-son opened up to Dad during a weekend visit and it launched an investigation that exposed a pedophile ring within the local fire department. Some fucking how he's already out of prison and he tried to casually start a conversation on Facebook messenger. Immediate block. i am wondering if my ex will come back into my life. apparently there is common belief that boys are fine at the start and only usually begin to miss you and potentially regret their decision a few weeks or months after making it, and attempt to reconnect. whereas for the girls, they are heartbroken the first few days- and slowly reestablish themselves and get better over time. have you got any personal experience with an ex coming back into your life? i know the saying "they're an ex for a reason" and everyone tells me to move on.. but it has only been a few days and well, he is the love of my life. Look girl let me tell you something I ignore the problem and it eats me up inside. Maybe you're feeling the same way. So is ignoring really going to HELP YOU move on? Who cares about him... what will help you move on? Because your definitely not ready. This guy is a NARS and he CHEATED on you and LIED about it to your face and you still felt sorry for him and wasted your precious time by trying to make him feel better? Girl where's your dignity? Did this guy crush you? Did he make you feel worthless at some point? I've been cheated on and it makes you question who you are so please do yourself a favor and walk away with confidence, dignity and respect for yourself because if you can't forgive him or if you keep being Mother Teresa and forgiving him and caring about him when he clearly didn't mind treating you bad then go ahead and waste your time. These feelings aren't fun they can consume you make you doubt yourself crush you so please breakup with him in a way that gives you peace and know that there's always someone else out there that won't take you for granted now notice I didn't say won't let you down because for example I told my boyfriend that the only way I'll leave him is if he cheats or lies to me with our finances with real life problems not pity stuff we couples argue about so if he broke your trust if you clearly had the line drawn in something and he still MADE A CHOICE to go against you then this guy ain't worth it. I'll assume you mean how much actual time would be served on a particular sentence... it starts with "good time credits" that are applied to the sentence calculator a the beginning of the sentence. An inmate can only lose that good time by having behavior issues or breaking numerous rules. In federal you get 15%, state prison ranges from 15-30% good time. The difference with the state is that they're also dealing with a parole system too that can release an offender having done only one-third of their sentence. i found out she had sex with another guy and confronted her. she cried and said she was sorry and said she was devastated that she hurt me. we worked on it for four months, during which time i said that i wanted all the facts. everything. don't hold back. i needed the truth to move on from the lies. i told her that it wasn't so much the actual sex that ate away at me. it was the lies and cover ups that shattered my trust. she said she would do that and anything else i needed. well, she had said she only hooked up with him three times and that it was mostly just companionship while i was long distance. (smh at how stupid i was.) then i found out that it was a four month affair. sleepovers multiple times a week. dates and picnics. pdas. going to the gym. going to his baseball games. cooking together. playing house. and unprotected sex with him while she was having unprotected sex with me. all her friends knew. and the ultimate infidelity is that she really was grooming him to be her boyfriend without ever telling him she was dating me. she lied to both of us. that's when i realized that she was never was truly sorry for doing something wrong. because she didn't see it as wrong. just exploring her options. she was only sorry she got caught. but, like an idiot, i tried for another four months. i was blinded by love and lust and the connection we had. finally i just realized that, even though i loved so much about her, she was not the one for me. trust is absolutely the foundational requirement for a healthy relationship. without it, there is nothing. why do you assume we don't... i had a friend that at 16 she was abducted and forced on herion i met her when she was 30... it took her 11 years to leave the prostitution life behind every time she would talk about it her pimp would dope her up and say that no one loves you except this needle... well i knew her when she was 3 years sober and her life was on the upswing... then one night her boyfriend said he didn't love her in a fight then he says that she said your right no one loves me... she started using again and then she disappeared. we looked for months she didn't show up in the homeless shelters and the cops found her hooking in arizona she lived in texas but she didn't go back to her boyfriend and i think she's still a junkie... that was 2 years ago saddly he hasn't herd from her even took a trip to bail her out twice but the pimp was closer... i think we do a terrible thing by making drugs illegal... her whole life would be different if she could be her own supplyer... but i hate the pimps if you stick a needle in someone's arm it should be attempted homicide or attempted slavery and they should be shot or hung for it... the men looking for the prostitutes ain't much better