couchbase upgrade questions
for which version of community was ephemeral buckets feature removed?

i heard a rumor that couchbase 6.0 was made to be more cpu intensive than couchbase 5.x. is that true?

do i have to upgrade my sdk when upgrading a couchbase major version from 5 to 6 (assuming i don’t need to use new fea…
[image] alon.schachter:

for which version of community was ephemeral buckets feature removed?

ephemeral buckets are, and have always been available in ce for core key-value operations, however certain additional functionality such as xdcr and secondary indexing are ee-only features.

i did …
all the info you need can be found in http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/291089-6-2-beta-release-candidate-ii-build-now-available-6-2-00797

 we strongly caution you against using the beta in production. if you hit a serious bug you may have to start from scratch! sometimes one or both of these patches help, especially if the system is showing high ram and/or cpu usage when checking updates:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265




https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3102810﻿﻿
﻿ generally the performance of a new generation of "supporting" equipment does not have a huge affect on the true performance. gddr6 is better, but it is not the only reason the super varient is going to be faster. same with pcie generations, and regular ddr3/4 ram. pcie gen 3 is not saturated, so gen 4 should not be a deciding factor (yet). ddr3 is worse than ddr4, but the performance change is seen when comparing the cpus directly, not in the ram alone. for both gpu and cpu, the ram will affect the performance, but not on its own. the rest of the part needs to be able to take advantage of the upgraded ram.

you can just compare the raw performance numbers of those two gpus, like benchmark fps in games, and use that to decide if you want to spend the extra $130 for the better gpu. you do not have to particularly worry about the supporting specs, like gddr5/6, cuda core count, or even base clock speed, because these differences will be reflected in the performance changes as a whole, so you do not have to compare those specific differences. certain models of gpu might be clocked faster, and will perform better, but you compare those models to the same gpu in stock form. ie, not 1650 vs 1650 super at higher clock, you would compare the base speed 1650 super to an upgraded 1650 super, to see how the clock speed boost changes the performance of the card over its stock clocks.

tl: dr, dont bother with the details too much, just use benchmarks/average fps to decide if the extra performance is worth the extra money. i think it’s too early to think about h.266.

in any case if it will be supported then you need new hardware. hi kenhaught, thanks for your replies. i finally fixed the problem. i had built the vms on a previous version of esxi, version 5.5, so they had an earlier vm version of the hardware. once i updated the hardware version, of the guest, to "esxi 6.5 and later (vm version 13)" the windows server 2016 option appeared. i’m afraid not at this time but it’d make for a great [feature request](https://community.devkinsta.com/c/feature-requests/6)! it is pre-installed as part of the newer upgrades there is no update from you for a period, assuming this is not an issue any more.

hence we are closing this topic. if need further support, please open a new one.

thanks

what’s the frame rate? have you try boost the system to performance mode to try? it’s out!!! rosetta 2 needed to function still, but looks like they’re still testing the m1 native driver.

[image]

[yamaha steinberg usb driver version 3.0.5 for macos released](https://forums.steinberg.net/t/yamaha-steinberg-usb-driver-version-3-0-5-for-macos-released/706670) [announcements](/c/announcements/5)

we are pleased to announce the release of a new version of the yamaha steinberg us… we believe this issue has been fixed with our most recent release, version 10.9.
 


 you can learn more here:
 



 please try updating, and let me know if you have any other questions.
 


  
 


 also, if you are experiencing this issue via the web client, please let us know here: