the historic war of 27 years can be segmented into three with the following concluding features:(a) &#8230;.
the historic war of 27 years can be segmented into three with the following concluding features:(a) marathas under sambhaji - fall of raigad and execution of sambhaji(b) marathas under rajaram - fall of gingee and death of rajaram (c) marathas under tarabai - defeat of marathas which of the above options is wrong?
the historic war of 27 years can be segmented into three with the following concluding features:(a) marathas under sambhaji - fall of raigad and execution of sambhaji(b) marathas under rajaram - fall of gingee and death of rajaram (c) marathas under tarabai - defeat of marathas which of the above options is wrong?
lose, surrender. the quickie answer is that, if the two armies are equal in resources, abilities and training, then the one with the largest number will win.

however, that's for a single battle. 

in real life, it's a matter of which force can bring to bear the greater force (position, resources, power) at specific points. then, in that local area, the greater force will always win. this is why the spartans at thermopylae could hold back an army of tens of thousands with only 300 men -- the persians could not bring their superior force (more men and other resources) to bear on what should have been a skirmish. yes, the persians eventually won, but at the price of being able to beat the athenian forces later, and even then, it was a matter of someone betraying the spartans.

in wwii, the germans should have won the battle of britain, which would have kept the russians and americans out of the war. but britain could use its resources better in the actual field (i know --it was mostly an aerial battle) and hence beat the germans back, preventing the superior forces from invading the islands and getting control of enough resources to conquer at least half the world.

in the american civil war, the confederacy should have won, because they had the better army and resources, but eventually, the union could bring more into play than they could, and turned the tide.

also look at israel's "six day war" -- out numbered and our resourced, they beat the arab coalition easily -- same basic principles...

so, not so much luck as being better able to use the resources available.

btw, read sun tzu's art of war -- being able to use your resources better than your opponent can mean that a smaller force beats the larger one correct is kavita me kavyitri ne manushya ko aashavadi bane rehne ka
sandesh diya hai yadi jeevan me aasha jeevit ho, to manushya har
prakar ki kathinaye tatha badha ko paar kar sakta hai aage barne ke
utsah se manushya utsahit rahega, yehi lakshya prapt karne ka
sootra hai (i) caste is primarily a social institution whereas class is an economic institution. eg. malhotra, bhandari, mukharjee are castes while industrial workers, agricultural workers denote the class including lower class, upper middle class, upper class.


(ii) caste represents social differentiation while the class represents social status and economic differentiations.


(iii) both of them result in social and economic inequality and therefore, systems of stratification. the sides of the triangle are 6 cm, 8 cm and 10 cm. the longest side is 10 cm. (10)2 = 100 ….(i) now, the sum of the squares of the other two sides will be, (6)2 + (8)2 = 36 + 64 = 100 ….(ii) (10)2 = (6)2 + (8)2 ….. from (i) and (ii) by the converse of pythagoras theorem: the given sides form a right angled triangle. sylvia frank chlh 274 homework problems chapter 3 1. a. crude death rate: total populace death in a specific span-time at the mean year. b. age-specific rate: total incidence occurred in a specific-age group of the populace in a specific span time. c. cause-specific rate: total death of a populace from a specific-cause in a specific span-time at the mean year. d. proportional mortality ratio: total death within a populace due to a specific-cause divided by the total death in the populace e. maternal mortality rate: incidence of death because of birth of a child or due to pregnancy associated complications. f. infant mortality rate: rate of event of newborn death over a year by birth of newborn over a same interval. g. neonatal mortality in the case of a crisis, like our economy, the president can declare martial law.anyone (not just minority) who dont cooperate ect. with the new world order agenda, or that cant contribute to the government will be gathered by federal agents and taken to concentration camps.god forbid we cant pay our taxes! at least thats the way i understand it. we can do both! but i think the media is going overboard on the reporting of saddam's payment of his crimes. every generation of christians have seen themselves as inhabiting the "end times" but the world hasn't ended, yet.

it is possible that there will be a pitched battle near the town of megiddo on the plains of the jezreel as there have been several recorded in history.

as the 'muslim spring' appears to be bringing islamists of one group or another to power, it is possible that there will be a general religious war in the region.