an average interaction with a trump supporter
youtu.be/5euxmol49as?t=54
you know the left has no compelling argument on their side, nor evidence or reason to support their positions. lacking anything credible the only thing left is insulting and spewing hate. so so sad to watch
i support, and have already voted for president trump. the trump supporters have been real quiet lately... Here is the video that helped me also...Harry Chrisp's YouTube channel had a video. <https://youtu.be/kuDpbR_LGKw> i know , right . biden brings in a few sleepy retirees to nap with and trump draws overflow crowds .

talk about an " enthusiasm gap ". i think it may just be a public official/politician thing. democrats don't have to good of a record either i bet. i just think they were trying to be conservative in a roman catholic priest kind of way. probably. some people get f****** offended so god d*** easy. there is already enough evidence to either require another election in some states (which there may not be time for) or require the state party convention (which are often controlled by republicans) to make a decision due to the issues laid out in the legal arguments. trump's team has very valid points and evidence to back up those points. legal process is necessary for legitimacy, but any judge who strictly interprets the law will side with trump’s team. due to the media’s propaganda campaign, i’m sure many judges would be concerned about the ramifications of the legal outcome, but ultimately they have to do their job as arbiters of the law. so trump should win his lawsuits even if the supreme court has to make the final decision. republicans are likely, but not guaranteed to be loyal to their party. trump will likely win in the end... either way, as of now no votes have been certified. if we examine those states that have generally finished their vote counts and have no legal contest at the moment then the current electoral vote count would be 227 biden vs 229 trump. so technically trump is currently winning even if the mainstream media wants to brainwash you into believing something else. well that is one campaign promise that he kept. 
he spread out tax money around to all the wealthy elite billionaires bailing out their corporations so that they didn't take any loses on their bad investments.

billionaire buffet backs obama and recently he bought a huge stake in bac. obama likes bailing out big banks where millionaires and billionaires have their money invested.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/17/us-obama-buffet-idustre6ag4mu20101117
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/warren-buffetts-rule-give-big-to-get-obama-re-elected/
billionaire buffet is a liberal and endorsed obama and senator clinton.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnokdcldrps
billionaire oprah winfrey is a liberal and endorsed obama
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/oprah\_winfrey's\_endorsement\_of\_barack\_obama
billionaire bill gates is a liberal and backed obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng3vrx0tuok
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544\_162-20025626-503544.html
billionaire george soros is a liberal and backed obama
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2007/01/27/george-soros-backs-obama-but-hedges-his-bets/

now we know why all these billionaires backed obama

@ hally m
obama did say that he liked spreading the wealth around. listen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooqi5psrcxm [@su.ziying](/u/su.ziying) <https://documenter.getpostman.com/view/3407886/rwgp1fb5> he is actually only a mediocre cold reader. he uses classic techniques for cold reading in groups, such a "shot gunning" and reading reactions to isolate individuals. pretty much by the book. 
he also creates a group attitude in which the entire group will pressure an individual into acknowledging he is correct, even if he is wrong. it would be impossible to go on the show and tell people that john edwards was wrong, because the group will wave their fingers and say "john edwards isn't wrong, you just don't know what he means yet"
also the show is filmed over 3 hours and edited down to 40 minutes, which gives edwards ample room to mess up. 
often times he shows clips of people who have gone home and claim he was correct, but he would never show it if someone claimed he was wrong. 
i used to tape the show in college, and several times i caught him actually lying and changing what he says. for example, he says "i am sensing your mother is passed away" to a person who says "no, my mother is fine." to which he replies "you didn't hear what i said. i said someone close to your mother is passed away." 
i am also told that people are seated and the cameras and sound are running for about 30 minutes before the show starts. meanwhile, what do people talk about? they talk about what relatives they hope to hear from and what they hope to find out during the show. it doesn't take too much imagination to figure out that someone is listening and taking notes.

edit: although its not about a medium, a good movie to watch to learn about group reading techniques is "leap of faith" with steve martin. its about a evangelistic preacher who goes around with a traveling christian revival show.