amd - viewport 2.91 - major drop in performance
honestly took me way to long to actually download older version and test, and just wanted to confirm with other users.

viewport performance in 2.91.2 is significanltly slower then 2.83lts…

in viewport, set fps to 100, and used playback funciton to show fps while rotating manual in the viewport aro…
found it!

<https://developer.blender.org/t84277>

this should be fixed as of feb 2 in the daily builds available at [builder.blender.org/download](http://builder.blender.org/download)

i suggest you test the beta build to confirm.
there is no update from you for a period, assuming this is not an issue any more.

hence we are closing this topic. if need further support, please open a new one.

thanks

what’s the frame rate? have you try boost the system to performance mode to try? 3700x is way better for streaming and gaming at the same time. the hit on game performance and also dropped frames when doing both on the same pc is much less with the 3700x so u got some wrong advice from that person.

also as sli sucks why dont u sell your two 1080 tis now u still can get a good price for them and buy a 2080 ti?? or sell at least on of them and buy the 3950x when it comes out. generally the performance of a new generation of "supporting" equipment does not have a huge affect on the true performance. gddr6 is better, but it is not the only reason the super varient is going to be faster. same with pcie generations, and regular ddr3/4 ram. pcie gen 3 is not saturated, so gen 4 should not be a deciding factor (yet). ddr3 is worse than ddr4, but the performance change is seen when comparing the cpus directly, not in the ram alone. for both gpu and cpu, the ram will affect the performance, but not on its own. the rest of the part needs to be able to take advantage of the upgraded ram.

you can just compare the raw performance numbers of those two gpus, like benchmark fps in games, and use that to decide if you want to spend the extra $130 for the better gpu. you do not have to particularly worry about the supporting specs, like gddr5/6, cuda core count, or even base clock speed, because these differences will be reflected in the performance changes as a whole, so you do not have to compare those specific differences. certain models of gpu might be clocked faster, and will perform better, but you compare those models to the same gpu in stock form. ie, not 1650 vs 1650 super at higher clock, you would compare the base speed 1650 super to an upgraded 1650 super, to see how the clock speed boost changes the performance of the card over its stock clocks.

tl: dr, dont bother with the details too much, just use benchmarks/average fps to decide if the extra performance is worth the extra money. this is duplicate of <https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1071283/>

let’s continue in topic 1071283. sometimes one or both of these patches help, especially if the system is showing high ram and/or cpu usage when checking updates:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3050265




https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3102810﻿﻿
﻿ hi, 
  
we did try following: 
  
1. update java to the latest version 
this didn't affect the cpu or ram consumption. 
  
2. assign more ram for java, we found on other forums that high pcu consumption was caused by lack of memory. 
this didn't affect the cpu consumption neither 
  
3. change the port for connector from 8443 to to save resources for port redirection. 
the cpu consumption for the redirection is so low that it didn't change either 
  
4. try to disable autodeploy and do it manually 
we couldn't do this as the concerned era is allready in production 
  
5. do you have issues with http traffic as well or just with https? 
as we are working on security, there is just no http at all ! (disabled in tomcat) 
  
  
but we found out that regarding the place from which we did connect (and the available bandwith) it did impact the behavior. 
whith a good bandwith: the page loads in something as 10 to 15 seconds and cpu load doesn't go at 100% or just for the few last seconds 
whith a bad bandwith: the page takes 1 to 3 minutes to load and cpu consumption goes to 100% (over several cores) after the 10 first seconds (just like a memory leak but with cpu). 
  
we don't get why but the longer it takes for the client's side (browser) to load the app, how more cpu is consumes on server... thank you for taking interest in my post.

i have solved the problem.it was mistake from my own part.

i have disabled some of the hardware detection services before the update.

i have disabled the "device install service" on the windows service

[[asas]](https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/arduino/original/4x/5/0/9/509934b6660953c4e848dc95f40efd35d02bfe60.png "asas")

renabling it and rebooting it solved the … welcome to the forum! :slight\_smile:

[image] adamski234:

i had linux59 installed since the nvidia drivers were released. but after the update to rc4, the driver stopped working, and while trying to update/reinstall i found out that the driver was not in the unstable repos. not 440xx, not 450xx,… hi,

i think the problem is the dynamo version you’re using.

now i have the most complex geometry (dynamo vers. 2,3,0) without problems.

if possible, can you send us an example to test?

here’s an example:

[[1]](https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/business6/uploads/dynamobim/original/3x/a/b/abcdb448d6e4193cee39105fb567675cbb19a9be.png "1")

durmus 7.0.3 is now available! :raised\_hands:

switch between modern and classic views on apple tv, remote control improvements, option to hide titles, and more.

<https://firecore.com/releases>
[[modern]](https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/business7/uploads/firecore/original/3x/d/8/d81d00bfac171dafa1ee2862c7ea1ccff4c3a2a4.jpeg "modern")
[[classic]](https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/business7/uploads/firecore/original/3x/7/8/788cfadb6f1830843dfd2b6d630750999f7271c6.jpeg "classic")