does the irs allow you to categorize trades by coin on form 8949?
so for the us form 8949, i have about 15 different coins listed, but rather than showing every single trade i did, accointing groups everything into one category based on the coin that you traded. for example, i did about 10 trades with btc, .1 btc each trade, rather than showing 10 trades, accointi…
we generate 4 types of outputs form 8949 in order for the user to decide how he wants to file choose the option “i file with a tax tool” when downloading your tax report.

you should get 5 files:

[[image]](https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/business20/uploads/accointing/original/2x/9/97fcba74d95d67a7eef8cdf94b2f0a7aad5e072d.png "image")
In the end, I found this query, which groups the way it should:  
  

```
SELECT 
 FROM_UNIXTIME( TRUNCATE( UNIX_TIMESTAMP( tstamp )/900, 0 ) * 900 ) as h,
 AVG( amount ) as v
FROM 
transactions
GROUP BY 
h
ORDER BY 
 h desc
LIMIT
 24
``` ok i got it,

'categories' => get\_the\_term\_list($post->id, 'portfolio\_categories'),

maybe that will be useful for somebody in the future. giving a name to checkboxes means grouping them together to the same question

if you have 10 questions, and each has 5 checkboxes, and you don’t group them together, that would mean having 50 checkboxes lumped together - maybe you have also pretty similar values etc…

you give each checkboxes group… if the value (or total amount) of these two kinds of coins is thirty dollars..
let n = # of nickles, so 500-n = # of dimes.
 
0.05n + 0.10(500-n) = 30.00 expressed the total value; solve for n and you'll then be able to give each count requested. 4th attempt! Now handles GroupItems. Feel free to ignore attempt 3, I've left it just for learning purposes. There are two ways you may want to handle groups: 1) calculate area for each individual item inside the group, or 2) calculate the aggregate area of all the grouped items. If you want option 2) just comment out the itemsInsideGroupItems line.

 

Just for fun I also changed the way the parameters work for specifying the target area value and unit. I put them in a string. Example values are: '4 square inches', '4in','4 sq inch' will give same result. Other examples are:'100mm', '800 pt'. If the parameter is a number, not a string, it will be interpreted as points.

 

 


```
// start with the selected items
var items = app.activeDocument.selection;

// comment out the following line if you want each groups' area to be calculated, rather than the items inside each group individually
items = itemsInsideGroupItems(items);

// this is where you specify your target size ()
scaleItemsToArea(items, '4 square inches');

function scaleItemsToArea(items, targetString) {
    // very simple parsing of targetString
    targetString = String (targetString);
    var targetAreaInSquareUnits = Number(targetString.match(/\d+/)[0]);
    var unitType;
    // note: only looks for 'in' or 'mm'
    if (targetString.search(/(in|\")/) > -1) {
        unitType = 'in';
    } else if (targetString.search(/mm/) > -1) {
        unitType = 'mm';
    } else {
        unitType = 'pt'
    }
    // scale each item
    for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
        scaleToArea(items[i], targetAreaInSquareUnits, unitType);
    }
}
function scaleToArea(item, targetAreaInSquareUnits, unitType) {
    var itemAreaInSquareUnits = areaOfItem(item, unitType);
    var scaleFactor = (Math.sqrt(targetAreaInSquareUnits / itemAreaInSquareUnits)) * 100;
    if (scaleFactor != NaN) {
        item.resize(scaleFactor, scaleFactor);
    }
}
function areaOfItem(item, unitType) {
    var itemAreaInSquareUnits;
    var itemAreaInSquarePoints = areaOfItemInSquarePoints(item);
    if (unitType == 'in') {
        var ptsIn1inch = 72;
        itemAreaInSquareUnits = itemAreaInSquarePoints / (ptsIn1inch * ptsIn1inch);
    } else if (unitType == 'mm') {
        var ptsIn1mm = 2.834645669;
        itemAreaInSquareUnits = itemAreaInSquarePoints / (ptsIn1mm * ptsIn1mm);
    } else {
        // no unitType specified, use points
        itemAreaInSquareUnits = itemAreaInSquarePoints;
    }
    return itemAreaInSquareUnits;
}
function areaOfItemInSquarePoints(item) {
    var area = 0;
    if (item.typename == 'PathItem') {
        area = item.area;
    } else if (item.typename == 'CompoundPathItem') {
        for (var j = 0; j < item.pathItems.length; j++) {
            area += item.pathItems[j].area;
            // $.writeln('item.pathItems[j].area = ' + item.pathItems[j].area + '     area = ' + area);
        }
    } else if (item.typename == 'GroupItem') {
        for (var j = 0; j < item.pageItems.length; j++) {
            area += areaOfItemInSquarePoints(item.pageItems[j]);
            // $.writeln('item.pathItems[j].area = ' + item.pathItems[j].area + '     area = ' + area);
        }
    } else {
        // for other types of items, resort to width x height
        area = item.width * item.height;
    }
    return Math.abs(Math.round(area * 10000) / 10000);
}
function itemsInsideGroupItems(items) {
    // returns an array containing items, including items found inside GroupItems
    try {
        var found = [];
        for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
            var item = items[i];
            if (item.typename == 'GroupItem') {
                found = found.concat(itemsInsideGroupItems(item.pageItems));
            } else {
                found.push(item);
            }
        }
        return found;
    } catch (e) {
        return found;
    }
}
```
 

 

As usual, not much testing done, so please let me know if it works as you'd expect. - Mark hi [@jitse\_b](/u/jitse_b)

welcome to the community !

yes you can, there are various ways to do so.

the simplest:

you may want to create a table with 3 columns,

key\_column, type text, value “k000” (or whatever you want, it doesn’t matter if you stick to only one comparison)

“material1”, type ref, source tabl… hii..

according to me,the cut off will be around 90-95 marks for general category,50-55 marks for obc category,35-40 marks for sc category and 25-30 marks for st category.so it is difficult to be predict now.

please see the table below for previous years trends:-

 

jee main cut off trends (2013-2017)

| s.no. | category | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
| 1 | general | 81 | 100 | 105 | 115 | 113 |
| 2 | obc-ncl | 49 | 70 | 70 | 74 | 70 |
| 3 | sc | 32 | 52 | 50 | 53 | 50 |
| 4 | st | 27 | 48 | 44 | 47 | 45 | nothing missing - just different:

1.  transfers are still linked.  enter one side of the transfer and in the category drop-down, select transfer > [other account].  changing either of the two entries modifies the other.

2.  multiple registers at the same time.  you can have every register open at once in its own window.  only one register at a time shows in the main window.  just double-click the account in the left panel to open a floating register window.

3.  move transactions between accounts.  with both registers displayed, drag the transaction from one to the other.  if it is a downloaded transaction, you'll get a warning.  you cannot, however, move transactions between investment accounts. hi,

lots of great explanations below, but i fear they might be difficult to truly conceptualize. 

let's start with a pie!

if there's a pie in front of us, that is the market. we'll call it 100 units of pie

we cut the pie in half - one piece (50 pie units) for you, and one piece (50 pie units) for me

scenario 1: we do nothing, we both have 50% market share.

scenario 2: i eat half my pie. my pie slice is now 25 units, yours is still 50 units. as a result, you have 67% of the market share and i have 33%. my "revenues" have fallen and my market share has fallen. your revenues haven't changed but you've gained market share

scenario 3: not only do i eat half my pie, but you also eat 20% of yours. still, i ate more, so even though your "revenues" are down, you've still gained market share.

scenario 4: we both get given more pie (yay). but, i get a whole other 50 units, and you only get 5 more. your "revenues" are up, but you've still lost market share!

i've created the below image for you to visualize this better (click on it to blow it up)...hope this helps! [@ojocionica](/u/ojocionica),

you’ve already been told advised on this – please do not reach out for assistance again:

it appears that the wallets ids you’ve provided were all flagged by our system for suspicious activity. unfortunately after a closer review of your case, we can no longer assist you with this par…