<p>Just started doing some design. First project was a replacement handle for my angle grinder, so basically a hollow cylinder. I want to reduce the amount of material used in the print. I could sit here and punch holes through the handle with a smaller cylinder, or some other shape etc., but is there an easier way to do this?</p>

<p>It must be a pretty common requirement, just like in the movies where the spies look at a photo and tell the tech to 'enhance ... enhance'. Ideally you could select a surface and overlay some sort of pattern to remove material.</p>

[{'answer_id': 3206, 'author': 'StarWind0', 'author_id': 2146, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/2146', 'pm_score': 4, 'selected': True, 'text': '<p>Updated to match the improved question format.</p>\n\n<p>There are a few ways to reduce material usage. First is what you have touched on. Which is to reduce the design by punching out holes, and removing all material that does not add anything to the structure. Even better is what you touched on, reducing it to the point where your print is more like a suspension bridge, where it is a the bare minimum scaffolding in a geometric pattern. </p>\n\n<p>Most tools you will find for reduction are like <a href="http://www.shapeways.com/tutorials/polygon_reduction_with_meshlab" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this tutorial from Shapeways on Meshlab</a> where you reduce the surface detail. It might be worth exploring these a bet, however probably not what you really need.</p>\n\n<p>Next the more hard core cad tools such as solid works will allow you to preform <a href="http://feaforall.com/reduce-cad-design-cost-using-simulation/#" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Parametric optimizations and Topology Optimization.</a>\nTopology Optimization. seems to be your real winner</p>\n\n<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/8Vmod.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/8Vmod.png" alt="Topology Optimization example"></a></p>\n\n<p>Now from the 3d printer standpoint we just simply tweak our slicer settings. There are entries for Infill. I usually print with 7% infill. AKA my print is 93% hollow inside. I then set a few solid shell layers. Think of solid shells as the skin. Usually that is enough to reduce my plastic usage. The only reason I don\'t make a part 100% hollow and a few solid skin / shell layers is that I need something to print on top of or if I need the part to be strong . Even low percent infill can be very strong if the correct geometric pattern is used (I.E. triangles).</p>\n\n<p>Generally the reduced infill will be enough, unless you are making thousands of this item, though in that case you are probably not going to 3d print it anyways.</p>\n\n<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/SHLTZ.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/SHLTZ.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>\n\n<p><a href="http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/infill-strength/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">3dprintingforbeginners</a> has a nice article on the relationship between infill, number of shells and part strength. A bit more information about the terminology (infill/shells/etc...) can be found on <a href="http://3dprinting-blog.com/tag/what-is-infill/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">3D printing blog</a>.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 3223, 'author': 'tbm0115', 'author_id': 98, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/98', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>"<em>Just like the movies</em>"-type tech typically means <strong><em>$$$</em></strong>. </p>\n\n<p>For those who do not own (legally or otherwise) expensive CAD software, it may be difficult to find an out-of-the-box solution. That\'s not to say that it can\'t be done.</p>\n\n<p>A close, readily available, solution would be to use a series of common CAD tools such as Shell and Scale. Between these functions, you should be able to scale a copy of your main solid object, then shell the new inner object. When sliced, the object should have a smaller "inner wall" and a hollow center. I would recommend this over 0% infill as a shell will not provide enough strength for the intended use you mentioned.</p>\n\n<p>There is a <a href="http://my3dmatter.com/influence-infill-layer-height-pattern/" rel="noreferrer">great article on My3DMatter.com</a> that provides details and a very interesting set of charts, outlining cost, speed, strength, and quality distributions at varying layer heights and infills.</p>\n\n<p><strong><em>Please Note:</em></strong> These results are going to <strong><em>differ</em> between different material types, vendors, part shape, and infill pattern</strong>. These results were found printing from a MakerBot Replicator and presumably MakerBot-branded filament.</p>\n\n<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/zpBXa.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/zpBXa.png" alt="Infill vs. Layer Height Comparisons"></a></p>\n'}]
['https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/3198', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/5236/']