<p>I really feel that I should learn <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)" rel="noreferrer">Lisp</a> and there are plenty of good resources out there to help me do it.</p>

<p>I'm not put off by the complicated syntax, but where in "traditional commercial programming" would I find places it would make sense to use it instead of a procedural language.</p>

<p>Is there a commercial killer-app out there that's been written in Lisp ?</p>

[{'answer_id': 4725, 'author': 'Justin Standard', 'author_id': 92, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/92', 'pm_score': 6, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p><em>complicated syntax</em>?? </p>\n\n<p>The syntax for lisp is <strong>incredibly simple</strong>.</p>\n\n<p>Killer app written in lisp: <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/" rel="noreferrer">emacs</a>.  Lisp will allow you to extend emacs at will to do almost anything you can think of that an editor might do.</p>\n\n<p><em>But</em>, you should only learn lisp if you <em>want</em> to, and you may never get to use at work ever, but it is still awesome.</p>\n\n<p>Also, I want to add: even if you find places where lisp will make sense, you will probably not convince anyone else that it should be used over java, c++, c#, python, ruby, etc.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 4729, 'author': 'Christian Lescuyer', 'author_id': 341, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/341', 'pm_score': 5, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I can\'t answer from first-hand experience but you should read what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham" rel="noreferrer">Paul Graham</a> wrote <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/lisp.html" rel="noreferrer">on Lisp</a>. As for the "killer-app" part, read <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html" rel="noreferrer">Beating the averages</a>.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 4730, 'author': 'Adam Haile', 'author_id': 194, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/194', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I agree that Lisp is one of those languages that you may never use in a commercial setting.  But even if you don\'t get to, learning it will definitely expand your understanding of programming as a whole.  For example, I learned Prolog in college and while I never used it after, I gave me a greater understanding of many programming concepts and (at times) a greater appreciation for the languages I do use.</p>\n\n<p>But if you are going to learn it...by all means, read <a href="http://paulgraham.com/onlisptext.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">On Lisp</a></p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 4733, 'author': 'Antonio Haley', 'author_id': 390, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/390', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Complicated syntax? The beauty of lisp is that it has a ridiculously simple syntax. It's just a list, where each element of the list can be either another list or an elementary data type. </p>\n\n<p>It's worth learning because of the way it enhances your coding ability to think about and use functions as just another data type. This will improve upon the way you code in an imperative and/or object-oriented language because it will allow you to be more mentally flexible with how your code is structured.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 4744, 'author': 'C Hogg', 'author_id': 634, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/634', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Okay, I might be weird but I really don\'t like Paul Graham\'s essays that much &amp; on Lisp is a really rough going book if you don\'t have some grasp of Common Lisp already.  Instead, I\'d say go for Siebel\'s <a href="http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Practical Common Lisp</a>.  As for &quot;killer-apps&quot;, Common Lisp seems to find its place in niche shops, like <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20100606004926/http://www.itasoftware.com:80/about_us/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ITA</a>, so while there isn\'t an app synonymous with CL the way Rails is for Ruby there are places in industry that use it if you do a little digging.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 4755, 'author': 'Justin Bennett', 'author_id': 271, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/271', 'pm_score': 7, 'selected': True, 'text': '<p>One of the main uses for Lisp is in Artificial Intelligence.  A friend of mine at college took a graduate AI course and for his main project he wrote a "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lights_Out_(video_game)" rel="noreferrer">Lights Out</a>" solver in Lisp. Multiple versions of his program utilized slightly different AI routines and testing on 40 or so computers yielded some pretty neat results (I wish it was online somewhere for me to link to, but I don\'t think it is).</p>\n\n<p>Two semesters ago I used Scheme (a language based on Lisp) to write an interactive program that simulated Abbott and Costello\'s "Who\'s on First" routine.  Input from the user was matched against some pretty complicated data structures (resembling maps in other languages, but much more flexible) to choose what an appropriate response would be.  I also wrote a routine to solve a 3x3 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_puzzle" rel="noreferrer">slide puzzle</a> (an algorithm which could easily be extended to larger slide puzzles).</p>\n\n<p>In summary, learning Lisp (or Scheme) may not yield many practical applications beyond AI but it is an extremely valuable learning experience, as many others have stated.  Programming in a functional language like Lisp will also help you think recursively (if you\'ve had trouble with recursion in other languages, this could be a great help).</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 8711, 'author': 'kokos', 'author_id': 1065, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1065', 'pm_score': 0, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Syntax is irrelevant, readability is not!</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 8789, 'author': 'John with waffle', 'author_id': 279, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/279', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Any language looks a lot harder when one doesn't use the common indentation conventions of a language.  When one follows them of Lisp, one sees how it expresses a syntax-tree structure quite readily (note, this isn't quite right because the preview lies a little; the r's should align with the fns in the recursive quicksort argument):</p>\n\n<pre><code>(defun quicksort (lis) \n  (if (null lis) \n      nil\n      (let* ((x (car lis)) \n             (r (cdr lis)) \n             (fn (lambda (a) \n                   (&lt; a x))))\n         (append (quicksort (remove-if-not fn \n                                           r)) \n                 (list x)\n                 (quicksort (remove-if fn \n                                       r))))))\n</code></pre>\n"}, {'answer_id': 8798, 'author': 'John with waffle', 'author_id': 279, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/279', 'pm_score': 4, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I programmed in Lisp professionally for about a year, and it is definitely worth learning.  You will have unparalleled opportunity to remove redundancy from your code, by being able to replace all boilerplate code with functions where possible, and macros where not.  You will also be able to access unparalleled flexibility at runtime, translating freely between code and data.  Thus, situations where user actions can trigger the need to build complex structures dynamically is where Lisp truly shines.  Popular airline flight schedulers are written in Lisp, and there is also a lot of CAD/CAM in Lisp.  </p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 8916, 'author': 'dlinsin', 'author_id': 198, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/198', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I found that learning a new language, always influences your programming style in languages you already know. For me it always made me think in different ways to solve a problem in my primary language, which is Java. I think in general, it just widens your horizon in term of programming.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 8957, 'author': 'Community', 'author_id': -1, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/-1', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>If you have to ask yourself if you should learn lisp, you probably don't need to.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 17693, 'author': 'Erlend Halvorsen', 'author_id': 1920, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1920', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Learning lisp will put Javascript in a completely different light! Lisp really forces you to grasp both recursion and the whole "functions as first class objects"-paradigm. See Crockfords excellent article on <a href="http://javascript.crockford.com/little.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Scheme vs Javascript</a>. Javascript is perhaps the most important language around today, so understanding it better is immensely useful!</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 17759, 'author': 'PPS', 'author_id': 2093, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2093', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>This is a topic i myself have pondered for a while but I have not really come to a decision, as usual time is the main problem... ;)</p>\n\n<p>And since I can´t find these links sofar in this post i add them for public interest:</p>\n\n<p>Success and Failure story:\n<a href="http://www.flownet.com/gat/jpl-lisp.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Lisping at JPL">Lisping at JPL</a></p>\n\n<p>Really impressive success story:\n<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/carl.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Lisp in use at the Orbitz corporation">Lisp in use at the Orbitz corporation</a></p>\n\n<p>Comparison and analysis of whether to use Lisp instead of Java:\n<a href="http://www.flownet.com/gat/papers/lisp-java.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Lisp as an Alternative to Java">Lisp as an Alternative to Java</a></p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 27656, 'author': 'Konrad Rudolph', 'author_id': 1968, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1968', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>If you like programming you should learn Lisp for the pure joy of it. <a href="http://xkcd.com/224/" rel="noreferrer">XKCD</a> perfectly expresses the intellectual enlightenment that ensues. Learning Lisp is for the programmer what meditation is for the Buddhist monk (and I meant this without any blasphemous connotation).</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 27658, 'author': 'OysterD', 'author_id': 2638, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2638', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>To add to the other answers:</p>\n\n<p>Because the <a href="http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SICP</a> course (the videos are available <a href="http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>) is awesome: teaches you Lisp <em>and a lot more</em>!</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 27673, 'author': 'Vetle', 'author_id': 2935, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2935', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Killer app? <a href="http://www.franz.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Franz Inc.</a> has a long list of <a href="http://www.franz.com/success/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">success stories</a>, but this list only includes users of AllegroCL... There are probably others. My favourite is <a href="http://www.franz.com/success/customer_apps/animation_graphics/naughtydog.lhtml" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the story about Naughty Dog</a>, since I was a big fan of the Crash Bandicoot games.</p>\n\n<p>For learning Common Lisp, I\'d recommend <a href="http://gigamonkeys.com/book" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Practical Common Lisp</a>. It has a hands-on approach that at least for me made it easier than other books I\'ve looked at.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 27730, 'author': 'Phil Bennett', 'author_id': 2995, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2995', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Lisp is very useful for creating little DSLs.  I've got a copy of Lisp in a Box running at work and I've written little DSLs to interrogate SQL server databases and generate data layers etc in C#.  All my boiler plate code is now written in lisp macros that output to C#.  I generate HTML, XML, all sorts of things with it.  While I wish I could use Lisp for everyday coding, Lisp can bring practical benefits.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 36440, 'author': 'fdesmet', 'author_id': 3792, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3792', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I took a "lisp class" in college back in the eighties.  Despite grokking all the concepts presented in the class, I was left without <em>any</em> appreciation for what makes lisp great. I\'m afraid that a lot of people look at lisp as just another programming language, which is what that course in college did for me so many years ago.  If you see someone complaining about lisp syntax (or lack thereof), there\'s a good chance that they\'re one of those people who has failed to grasp lisp\'s greatness.  I was one of those people for a very long time.</p>\n\n<p>It wasn\'t until two decades later, when I rekindled my interest in lisp, that I began to "get" what makes lisp interesting--for me anyway.  If you manage to learn lisp without having your mind blown by closures and lisp macros, you\'ve probably missed the point.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 63696, 'author': 'user7517', 'author_id': 7517, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/7517', 'pm_score': 7, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Lisp is a large and complex language with a large and complex runtime to support it.  For that reason, Lisp is best suited to large and complicated problems.</p>\n\n<p>Now, a <em>complex</em> problem isn\'t the same as a <em>complicated</em> one.  A <em>complex</em> problem is one with a lot of small details, but which isn\'t hard.  Writing an airline booking system is a complex business, but with enough money and programmers it isn\'t hard.  Get the difference?</p>\n\n<p>A complicated problem is one which is convoluted, one where traditional divide and conquer doesn\'t work.  Controlling a robot, or working with data that isn\'t tabular (languages, for example), or highly dynamic situations.</p>\n\n<p>Lisp is really well suited to problems where the solution must be expandable; the classic example is the emacs text editor.  It is fully programmable, and thus a programming environment in it\'s own right.</p>\n\n<p>In his famous book <a href="http://norvig.com/paip.html" rel="noreferrer">PAIP</a>, Norvig says that Lisp is ideal for exploratory programming.  That is, programming a solution to a problem  that isn\'t fully understood (as opposed to an on-line booking system).  In other words: Complicated problems.</p>\n\n<p>Furthermore, learning Lisp will remind you of something fundamental that has been forgotten: The difference between Von Neumann and Turing.  As we know, Turing\'s model of computation is an interesting theoretical model, but useless as a model for designing computers.  Von Neumann, on the other hand, designed a model of how computers and computation were to execute: The Von Neumann model.\nCentral to the Von Neumann model is that you have but one memory, and store both your code and your data there.  Notice carefully that a Java program (or C#, or whatever you like) is a manifestation of the Turing model.  You set your program in concrete, once and for all.  Then you hope you can deal with all data that gets thrown on it.</p>\n\n<p>Lisp maintains the Von Neuman model; there is no sharp, pre-determined border between code and data.  Programming in Lisp opens your mind to the power of the Von Neumann model.  Programming in Lisp makes you see old concepts in a new light.</p>\n\n<p>Finally, being interactive, you\'ll learn to interact with your programs as you develop them (as opposed to compile and run).  This also change the way you program, and the way you view programming.</p>\n\n<p>With this intro I can finally offer a reply to your question: Will you find places where it outshines "traditional" languages?</p>\n\n<p>If you are an advanced programmer, you need advanced tools.  And there is no tool more advanced than Lisp.\nOr, in other words: The answer is yes if your problems are hard.  No otherwise.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 63842, 'author': 'Community', 'author_id': -1, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/-1', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>You could use <a href="http://clojure.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Clojure</a> today to write tests and scripts on top of the Java VM.  While there are other Lisp languages implemented on the JVM, I think Clojure does the best job of integrating with Java.</p>\n\n<p>There are times when the Java language itself gets in the way of writing tests for Java code (including "traditional commercial programming").  (I don\'t mean that as an indictment of Java -- other languages suffer from the same problem -- but it\'s a fact.  Since the topic, not Java, I won\'t elaborate.  Please feel free to start a new topic if someone wants to discuss it.)  Clojure eliminates many of those hindrances.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 69879, 'author': 'Marcio Aguiar', 'author_id': 4213, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/4213', 'pm_score': 6, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>In response to <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4724/learning-lisp-why#4737">@lassevk</a>:</p>\n\n<p><a href="http://xkcd.com/297/" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/lisp_cycles.png" alt="alt text"></a></p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 130578, 'author': 'CAD bloke', 'author_id': 492, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/492', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Not a reason but (trivial) AutoCAD has LISP &amp; DCL runtime support. It is a convenient way to write complex macros (including ActiveX automation) if you don't want to use VBA or their C++ or .NET SDKs, or if a DIESEL expression doesn't cut it.</p>\n\n<p>A lot of AutoCAD's functions are actually LISP routines.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 163152, 'author': 'Peter Turner', 'author_id': 1765, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1765', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Gimp's Script-Fu is lipsish. That's a photoshop-killer app.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 320920, 'author': 'pupeno', 'author_id': 6068, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/6068', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Lisp can be used anywhere you use traditional programming. It\'s not that different, it\'s just more powerful. Writing a web app? you can do it on Lisp, writing a desktop application? you can do it on Lisp, whatever, you can probably do it on Lisp, or Python, or any other generic programming (there are a few languages that are suited for only one task).</p>\n\n<p>The biggest obstacle will probably be acceptance of your boss, your peers or your customers. That\'s something you will have to work with them. Choosing a pragmatic solution like <a href="http://clojure.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Clojure</a> that can leverage the current install base of Java infrastructure, from the JVM to the libraries, might help you. Also, if you have a Java program, you may do a plug-in architecture and write Clojure plug-ins for it and end up writing half your code in Clojure.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 323000, 'author': 'J.T. Hurley', 'author_id': 39851, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/39851', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>Learning LISP/Scheme may not give you any increased application space, but it will help you get a better sense of functional programming, its rules, and its exceptions. </p>\n\n<p>It's worth the time investment just to learn the difference in the beauty of six nested pure functions, and the nightmare of six nested functions with side effects.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 327144, 'author': 'Dan Malkinski', 'author_id': 30901, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/30901', 'pm_score': 0, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Not saying this is a killer app but it looks like it could be cool\n<a href="http://code.google.com/p/plop/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://code.google.com/p/plop/</a></p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 352358, 'author': 'Vatine', 'author_id': 34771, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/34771', 'pm_score': 0, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Killer app? The flight search engine by ITA Software is one.</p>\n\n<p>As for "why", it will most probably make you a better developer and is extremnely unlikely to make you a worse one. It may, however, make you prefer lisp dialects to other languages.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 2564880, 'author': 'krdluzni', 'author_id': 143951, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/143951', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>From <a href="http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/introduction-why-lisp.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/introduction-why-lisp.html</a></p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>One of the most commonly repeated\n  myths about Lisp is that it\'s "dead."\n  While it\'s true that Common Lisp isn\'t\n  as widely used as, say, Visual Basic\n  or Java, it seems strange to describe\n  a language that continues to be used\n  for new development and that continues\n  to attract new users as "dead." Some\n  recent Lisp success stories include\n  Paul Graham\'s Viaweb, which became\n  Yahoo Store when Yahoo bought his\n  company; ITA Software\'s airfare\n  pricing and shopping system, QPX, used\n  by the online ticket seller Orbitz and\n  others; Naughty Dog\'s game for the\n  PlayStation 2, Jak and Daxter, which\n  is largely written in a\n  domain-specific Lisp dialect Naughty\n  Dog invented called GOAL, whose\n  compiler is itself written in Common\n  Lisp; and the Roomba, the autonomous\n  robotic vacuum cleaner, whose software\n  is written in L, a downwardly\n  compatible subset of Common Lisp.\n  Perhaps even more telling is the\n  growth of the Common-Lisp.net Web\n  site, which hosts open-source Common\n  Lisp projects, and the number of local\n  Lisp user groups that have sprung up\n  in the past couple of years.</p>\n</blockquote>\n'}, {'answer_id': 6969241, 'author': 'eric.christensen', 'author_id': 102022, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/102022', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>"Lisp is worth learning for the profound enlightenment experience you will have when you finally get it; that experience will make you a better programmer for the rest of your days, even if you never actually use Lisp itself a lot."</p>\n\n<p>--Eric S. Raymond, "How to Become a Hacker"</p>\n\n<p><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html</a></p>\n'}]
['https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/4724', 'https://Stackoverflow.com', 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/381/']