<p>I just re-ran all basic calibration steps from the Original Prusa i3 MK2 Manual.</p>

<p>Now, when doing the first layer calibration, lines that are running in positive X direction are ok, while those running in negative X direction are severely squished.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/5zzEl.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/5zzEl.jpg" alt="Print of the default V2Calibration.gcode file on my Prusa i3 MK2"></a>
<em>(The "waviness" of my print bed is an artifact of the camera lens distortion of my smartphone)</em></p>

<p>I already did Bed level correction, so each line is exactly the same width over its entire distance and tried to raise the live-adjust Z, but that leads to the thin lines not adhering at all. My printer is 100% stock, I modified nothing about it. </p>

<p>What can I do to troubleshoot this further?</p>

[{'answer_id': 6240, 'author': 'Trish', 'author_id': 8884, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/8884', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<h2>No FDM print at all.</h2>\n<p>The problem of your design will not be the materials, but a basic property of FDM printing: FDM Printers do create a structure by placing a long string of filament next to itself and ontop of itself, creating tons of boudaries.</p>\n<p>These boundaries between the layers are the weak points for this application: Even if the material like ABS could withstand the blow handled with such a club, the print will break at its weakest point - which in this case is any layer boundary. This is amplyfied by the basic design we have here: The elongated shape will serve as a lever on each of the weak boundries, until one gives way and results in catastrophic failure and a flying clubhead.</p>\n<h1>Non-FDM for the rescue.</h1>\n<p>To counteract this, you need to use a different method than FDM printing to get a more homogenous material than the bound deposited filament. Such methods could be for example SLA (Stereolithography) or SLS (Selective Laser Sintering). Both could easily offer even tiny details.</p>\n<p>SLS uses Nylon or metal powders, sometimes even ceramics - Tungstencarbide for example.</p>\n<h3>SLA/Resin</h3>\n<p>Using a Resin printer using the SLA methods results in an object almost as homogenous as an injecion molded object. Proper aftercare and curing is required to get the best results. Also, Resin prints usually age under UV light, which can negatively impact lifetime. SLA printers are expensive (for home printers), print shops that offer them relatively rare and costly (in comparison to FDM) but usually offer superb resolution and almost perfect smoothness. A lot of the exact material properties is resin and aftercare dependant.</p>\n<p>A way around the aging could be that the results of an SLA print could be used to create green-sand molds countless times, which can be used for casting metal or even some thermoplastics. Remember though, that cooling metal shrinks.</p>\n<h3>SLS Nylon</h3>\n<p>Nylon would be a medium rigid, light solution, but it ages and has a quite rough surface. It does offer some flex, almost perfect for this application. While most SLS machines for nylon are commercial to industrial, print technology of this kind is widespread enough to make them somewhat affordable (for an industrial printer) and printshops for these relatively common, prints are not cheap but well priced.</p>\n<h3>DMLS / SLM</h3>\n<p>Direct Metal Laser Sintering and Selective Laser Melting - an evolution of SLS - allows to create structures from various metals by sintering/melting powders of metal at the right spot to gain shape. The benefit would be, that you get a part that could withstand much more destructive testing than your bottle used as a clubhead - you get a workpiece of solid metal (Steel, aluminium, Titanium and a lot others are available) after all that has the same properties as a cast item. The big downside is, that only few companies currently delve into DMLS, among them the former patent holder of many of the FDM printing patents, <a href="https://www.stratasysdirect.com/technologies/direct-metal-laser-sintering" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Stratasys</a>. This means, that a machine for this is industrial rated and priced, and that print suppliers charge accordingly.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 6241, 'author': 'Axel Fernandes', 'author_id': 9769, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/9769', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p><strong><em>If you want a 3D printing answer then</em></strong> </p>\n\n<p>I see that the part has a few major points of concern to me: </p>\n\n<ol>\n<li><p>Threads (Gosh I hate threads).</p></li>\n<li><p>Tolerance - +/- 0.1 mm-0.2 mm should work fine (in terms of those threads fitting on the top of the bottle)</p></li>\n<li><p>Strength - This needs to be strong, so as to be able to effectively not break when spinning around.</p></li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>In terms of tech your best option is - SLS  </p>\n\n<p>Layer resolution - 0.120 mm</p>\n\n<p>For material options (In descending order of choice)</p>\n\n<ol>\n<li><p><strong><em>PA 11</em></strong> - Impact resistance is the major property for these parts. This is the material for your application .\nHere is the material data sheet - <a href="https://www.3dhubs.com/material/eos-pa-1102-black" rel="nofollow noreferrer">EOS PA 1102 Black</a>.  </p></li>\n<li><p><strong><em>Glass filled PA-12</em></strong> (I\'ll be taking this as second  option) it has the strength but is extremely brittle . Material Data sheet - <a href="https://www.3dhubs.com/material/eos-pa-3200-gf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">EOS PA 3200 GF</a>.</p></li>\n<li><p><strong><em>DuraForm ProX HST Composite</em></strong> (The expensive option) Yeah this will work. Check out the data sheet <a href="https://www.3dhubs.com/material/3d-systems-duraform-prox-hst-composite" rel="nofollow noreferrer">3D Systems DuraForm ProX HST Composite</a></p></li>\n</ol>\n\n<p><strong><em>Now the Non 3D printing solution</em></strong> </p>\n\n<p>So, to manufacture this design any other way is actually very simple but the threads are a serious area of concern.</p>\n\n<ol>\n<li>The body section can be cut on a standard 3 axis CNC.</li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>For material options please choose a no brainer like <strong><em>polycarbonate or delrin</em></strong>. Find information here: <a href="https://www.3dhubs.com/cnc-machining/plastic" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Plastic\nCNC machining</a>.</p>\n\n<ol start="2">\n<li>Threads would have to be manually lathe machined onto it. (You need some beautiful hand work here). This might not be feasible by suppliers on 3dhubs.</li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>Now my argument is to go for Additive manufacturing over CNC as you get the part straight out of the machine with the threads and material strength innate.</p>\n\n<p>You can even make the part hollow using some design skills. This will make it lighter.</p>\n\n<p>It would be very nice if you could get your 3D file ready so as to start this whole process and actually go about to manufacture it.</p>\n\n<p>I can add more details if you want to. Just comment and ask.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 6243, 'author': 'Boojah', 'author_id': 11207, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/11207', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<h2>I do think that FDM is possible for this item.</h2>\n\n<p>Polyamide (nylon) would be my first choice for this, as it has great interlayer strength and it is very impact resistant and durable. Its failure mode will be permanent bending and stretching rather than cracks or a clean break like common FDM plastics like PLA and ABS.</p>\n\n<p>I also needed a filament to simulate PP for FDM use recently, and found that <a href="http://www.polymaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PolyMide%E2%84%A2-CoPA_TDS_V3-1.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Polymaker CoPa">Polymaker\'s nylon co-polymer CoPa</a> in its conditioned state closely matches PP in its properties. Conditioned means that it has absorbed moisture which softens polyamide.</p>\n\n<p>Regular nylon for 3d printing should have similar properties to CoPa, if a bit softer than PP in my experience.</p>\n\n<h2>However material is only secondary to geometry</h2>\n\n<p>I believe that in general the actual 3d model and its geometry is more important than the material itself. Indeed this item could be made using regular brittle PLA if the design is good, but it might be heavy or bulky. Thus choosing a better suited material is often a trade between weight, dimensions, and cost. Printing with PLA using very high infill might work, but would take too long and be too heavy compared to nylon, as an example. </p>\n\n<p>This also means that the design of the part would inform the choice of the printing method to be used. Using FDM printing the Z-axis is a lot weaker than X-Y. But other methods are not completely isotropic either - they still have layers that can introduce stress risers and weaker bonding, but they are much less prominent than in FDM. Changing the design can enable you to choose a cheaper process.</p>\n\n<p>Two important principles for designing for 3d printing to be considered before doing a final selection of material are:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Increasing the dimensions/wall thickness in weak or highly loaded\nareas.</li>\n<li>Design with printing orientation in mind.  Choose a proper orientation for the load the item will experience.</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>To exemplify for your particular case:\nIncrease the thickness of the handle around the connection to the bottle.\nLay it down with the long axis in the X-Y plane which will increase the strength tremendously, perhaps enabling it to be printed in PLA, ABS or PETG. Either split it in half and glue/screw it together, or use supports. You may need to print the threads upright as a separate part that is mated to the handle in the assembly process.</p>\n\n<p>Finally, I would like to encourage you to embrace the main benefit of "rapid prototyping" - its speed and low cost to try things out. Make a first prototype and test it to destruction before settling on the design and material selection.</p>\n'}]
['https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/6260', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/7540/']