<p>I had this idea for bulky parts for just printing the shell (PLA) then pouring in some kind of filler in to make up the bulk/strength.</p>

<p>Printing bulk .2mm at a time line by line is slow and subject to warping!</p>

<p>So I though precision print a shell and fill it with 'something' - has this been done by anyone? What is a good something to use?</p>

<p>Yours hopefully!</p>

[{'answer_id': 3892, 'author': 'Davo', 'author_id': 4922, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/4922', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Or you could use a second head to do low-density infill with very thick layers, like a 1.5mm nozzle and 1.2mm layers.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 3893, 'author': 'tbm0115', 'author_id': 98, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/98', 'pm_score': 0, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Not exactly the same, but MakerBot Industries is making improvements to their programs by allowing users to do away with standard infill practices (patterned infill). Their approach is to treat infill similarly to how they treat outer support structures, the "infill" only exists in the interest of supporting roofs.</p>\n\n<p><a href="https://www.makerbot.com/media-center/2017/03/20/introducing-makerbot-minfill" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Check out MakerBot\'s article about it</a>.</p>\n\n<p>This method achieves the same time-savings that you describe in your question, but will not necessarily provide as much structural integrity, depending on your approach.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 3894, 'author': 'Diesel', 'author_id': 5518, 'author_profile': 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/5518', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': True, 'text': '<p>I\'ve looked into doing something similar to this before and love the idea, never had the chance to follow  through on it yet. This is sort of a hybrid method between cast molding and 3D printing. </p>\n\n<p>The accepted answer to a question I had a while back had some very good points by fred_dot_u</p>\n\n<p><a href="https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/3720/post-processing-fdm-for-strengrh">Post processing FDM for strengrh</a></p>\n\n<p>Short version, Epoxy is a good option but you may have to consider heat generated from it. Urethane is another really good option (cast urethane is a pretty standard process). Chem-Eng isn\'t my area of expertise but there is a huge range of material options out there that can be mixed as two parts. I think there are enough options out there right now that you can choose your material properties you need and then select the material from there.</p>\n\n<p>You  could also consider going the chopped-fiber composite route. (carbon, glass, etc) and then combine with whatever the appropriate resin is for those materials. </p>\n\n<p>I see the most difficult part of this is getting the shells to print properly. When I had looked into doing this, I considered modeling my part then hollowing it out completely. Then going back into the hollow part and designing in minimal internal structures for the purpose of supporting the thin-walled shell model. Printing that, and then drilling and filling the part after the fact. This approach I see as being a good option however the location of the drill points would be critical otherwise you could get voids as your fill material is injected in. And, the additional modeling time wouldn\'t be insignificant, however the saving I expected would come from having a ridiculously strong part, with complex geometry and be significantly cheaper than even a cast-urethane part.</p>\n\n<p>If you get some good results, please post a link to them! This is a huge interest of mine!</p>\n'}]
['https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/3887', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com', 'https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/users/6829/']