<p>So I've looked at <a href="http://mjtemplate.org/examples/freebase/names.html?name=%EB%A1%9C%EB%A7%88&amp;lang=ko" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this use</a> of the <a href="http://freebase.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">freebase</a> API and I was really impressed with the translations of the name that it found. IE Rome, Roma, Rom, Rzym, Rooma,로마, 罗马市. This is because I have a database of some 5000+ location names and I would very much like all French, German or Korean translations for these English names.</p>

<p>The problem is I spent about two hours clicking around freebase, and could find no way to get a view of city/location names in a different language mapped to English. So I'd love it if someone who understands what freebase is and how it's organized could get me a link to that view which theoretically I could then export.</p>

<p>Also I just wanted to share this question because I'm totally impressed with freebase and think if people haven't looked at it they should.</p>

[{'answer_id': 33480, 'author': 'bdukes', 'author_id': 2688, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2688', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>We\'re huge fans of <a href="http://www.telerik.com/products/aspnet-ajax/overview.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Telerik</a> here.  Their control are all of the things you mention.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 33489, 'author': 'Jason Bunting', 'author_id': 1790, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1790', 'pm_score': 2, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>Well, I can only speak about <strong><a href="http://www.infragistics.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the Infragistics controls</a></strong> - they have a lot of bang for your buck and are well documented, very consistent and are well integrated with the standard ASP.NET programming model, etc.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>Begin rant:</p>\n\n<p>I personally think they are bloated and past their prime in today\'s world of lighter-weight JavaScript libraries and toolkits. Most developers are becoming more and more proficient in such toolkits, so the abstractions provided by Infragistics and other such and similar control vendors are not needed as much.</p>\n\n<p>But that is purely <em>my opinion</em>.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 33494, 'author': 'Alex', 'author_id': 447, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/447', 'pm_score': 0, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p><a href="http://www.componentart.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ComponentArt</a> has some pretty cool controls. You might want to check out <a href="http://www.telerik.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Telerik</a> as well. Both companies offer pretty easy to use controls that look nice.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 33561, 'author': 'mattruma', 'author_id': 1768, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1768', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p>I\'ve looked at <strong>a lot</strong> of control libraries ... too many to count.  I like the <a href="http://www.devexpress.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DevExpress</a> controls as they provided a complete suite for Windows and the Web.  They also include charting, gauges and reports. We write apps for Windows and the Web so it makes it <em>easy</em> to transition between the two.</p>\n\n<p>Though, when it comes to a Web environment we try to <em>minimize</em> the custom controls we use, just because of the added <em>bloat</em>.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 35561, 'author': 'Paul Mrozowski', 'author_id': 3656, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/3656', 'pm_score': 3, 'selected': True, 'text': '<p>I\'ll second the vote for <a href="http://www.telerik.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Telerik</a>. Their controls for the most part &quot;just work&quot; and their support has been excellent. I primarily use their forums and I still receive a response within a day (unlike some other vendors who barely seem to notice that they\'ve even got a forum).</p>\n<p>It also feels like they\'ve actually spent time trying out a lot of the ways customer\'s will use their controls. The documentation and support reflects it. They aren\'t perfect, though. One issue that they had in the past, and that they\'ve addressed in the latest releases (what they were calling their &quot;Prometheus&quot; controls, now just &quot;Rad Controls for ASP.NET AJAX&quot;) is the performance of the controls. In previous releases they were definitely a bit sluggish (I\'m thinking specifically of their RadGrid and RadEditor). Now they\'re noticeably faster (esp. the RadEditor - it loads MUCH faster).</p>\n<p>Overall I wouldn\'t think twice of recommending them.</p>\n'}, {'answer_id': 35566, 'author': 'Jim', 'author_id': 1208, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/1208', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': "<p>I don't have a recommendation, but I do have some feedback on the Telerik recommendations.  I can't stand their tools myself.  The performance of their more complicated controls (e.g., Tree, Grid) is very sluggish and feels very un-web 2.0.</p>\n"}, {'answer_id': 16150128, 'author': 'berkay', 'author_id': 2126371, 'author_profile': 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/2126371', 'pm_score': 1, 'selected': False, 'text': '<p><a href="http://jdash.net/" rel="nofollow">JDash.Net</a> is an Asp.Net Web Forms control library which allows you to easily and seemlessly integrate end user designed dashboards into your application. JDash.Net is browser and database independent</p>\n\n<p>You can provide personalized start pages and modern dashboards to your users.\nYour users are able to customize start page of your application and create their own dashboards using your dashlets.</p>\n\n<p><a href="http://jdash.net/demo" rel="nofollow">Demo Site</a></p>\n'}]
['https://Stackoverflow.com/questions/33484', 'https://Stackoverflow.com', 'https://Stackoverflow.com/users/459/']