Datasets:

kilian-group
/

arxiv-classifier

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Subset (4)

default · ~99.6k rows (showing the first 120k)

Split (2)

train · ~72.4k rows (showing the first 93.1k)

paper_id stringlengths 9 16	version stringclasses 26 values	yymm stringclasses 311 values	created timestamp[s]	title stringlengths 6 335	secondary_subfield sequencelengths 1 8	abstract stringlengths 25 3.93k	primary_subfield stringclasses 124 values	field stringclasses 20 values	fulltext stringlengths 0 2.84M
1909.00888	2	1909	2019-12-26T21:55:00	Rational Inattention and Perceptual Distance	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper uses an axiomatic foundation to create a new measure for the cost of learning that allows for multiple perceptual distances in a single choice environment so that some events can be harder to differentiate between than others. The new measure maintains the tractability of Shannon's classic measure but produces richer choice predictions and identifies a new form of informational bias significant for welfare and counterfactual analysis.	econ.TH	econ	Rational Inattention and Perceptual Distance David Walker-Jones University of Toronto [email protected] Keywords: rational inattention, Shannon Entropy, perceptual distance. JEL Classification : D83 December 30, 2019 Abstract This paper uses an axiomatic foundation to create a new measure for the cost of learning that allows for multiple perceptual distances in a single choice environment so that some events can be harder to differentiate between than others. The new measure maintains the tractability of Shannon's classic measure but produces richer choice predictions and identifies a new form of informational bias significant for welfare and counterfactual analysis.1 1 Introduction In many choice environments it is costly for agents to obtain information about the options that they face. Understanding how agents learn in such environments is crucial because partially informed choices have serious implications for revealed preference analysis, which makes welfare and counterfacutal analysis more difficult. 1Special thanks to Rahul Deb for all of the support. I would also like to thank Yoram Halevy, Marcin Peski, Carolyn Pitchik, and Colin Stewart, for their helpful advice. 1 The standard technique for quantifying the cost of learning in models of rational inattention (RI) is Shannon Entropy (Sims, 2003). Shannon Entropy has an axiomatic foundation, is grounded in the optimal coding of information, and provides a tractable and flexible framework with which to study agent behavior (Shannon, 1948). While Shannon Entropy has proven to be a valuable tool, it does have limitations in economic environments as they are not what it is designed for. It is natural to think, for instance, that it should be more difficult to differentiate between outcomes that are more similar. Differentiating between two types of black tea should be more difficult than differentiating between water and coffee. Shannon Entropy, however, does not allow for different outcomes to be more or less similar than each other. Without a mechanism to allow for what is referred to in the literature as 'perceptual distance,'2 the choice behavior predicted by Shannon Entropy can differ from observed behavior, as is demonstrated by Example 1 in Section 2.1, which can limit the effectiveness of Shannon Entropy in empirical settings. This paper proposes five axioms that focus on the cost of asking simple ques- tions, questions that can be represented by partitions of the state space. The axioms are used to create a new measure for the cost of learning that we call Multisource Shannon Entropy (MSSE). MSSE features perceptual distance, maintains the desired tractability and flexibility of Shannon's classic measure when incorporated into a model of RI, and predicts behavioral patterns that have been identified as problem- atic for Shannon Entropy. MSSE also identifies a previously undiscovered informational bias in random utility (RU) models that should be considered a natural consequence of different per- ceptual distances in the same choice environment, as is demonstrated by Example 2 in Section 2.2. While other papers study measures of information that feature per- ceptual distance (e.g., H´ebert & Woodford, 2017), this paper is the first to identify informational biases in RU models generated by the presence of different perceptual 2If two outcomes are more similar it is said that they have less perceptual distance between them. 2 distances in the same choice environment. Unlike the informational bias identified with Shannon Entropy, this type of informational bias cannot be identified in the unconditional choice probabilities of the agent, and thus presents a new challenge for welfare and counterfactual analysis. 1.1 Literature Review Shannon Entropy has been used in several contexts to demonstrate informa- tional biases in RU models. Matejka and McKay (2015) use Shannon Entropy in a model of RI to demonstrate the potential for informational biases in multinomial logit, while Steiner, Stewart, and Matejka (2017) use Shannon Entropy in a model of RI to demonstrate the potential for a similar bias in dynamic logit. These results are significant for those who wish to fit RU models because, while observational data may coincide with the assumptions of a fitted RU model, informational biases can potentially invalidate counterfactual and welfare analysis, two common goals of such a fitting. The Shannon RI model has also led to a number of predictive successes. Acharya and Wee (2019) show that using Shannon Entropy to model firms as rationally inattentive re- sults in a better fitting of labor market dynamics after the great depression. Dasgupta and Mondria (2018) show that using Shannon Entropy to model importers as rationally inattentive results in novel predictions that are supported by trade data. Ambuehl, Ockenfels, and Stewart (2019) experimentally verify predictions of Shannon Entropy in environments where agents are rationally inattentive to the consequences of participating in different trans- actions. Perhaps as a response to the success Shannon Entropy has enjoyed, several recent papers have noted that Shannon Entropy may be a poor measure of the cost of acquiring information in some environments (Caplin, Dean, & Leahy, 2017; Morris & Yang, 2016) because it lacks what is called "perceptual distance" (Caplin et al., 2017, p. 39). As was alluded to previously, these papers argue that (i) more similar 3 outcomes (outcomes that have less perceptual distance between them) should be more difficult to differentiate between, and (ii) when this property is missing, predicted be- havior can differ signficantly from the type of behavior that it would seem natural to expect (Morris & Yang, 2016). To better understand the relationship between the cost of learning and agent behavior, a number of papers have studied axiomatic models of rational inattention. Different papers, however, choose to focus their axioms on different aspects of the choice environment. Caplin et al. (2017), for instance, develop axioms that focus on the choice behavior of an agent after they expend effort to learn about the state of the world. In contrast, de Oliveira (2014) and de Oliveira, Denti, Mihm, and Ozbek (2017) develop axioms that focus on an agent's preferences over choice menus before they expend effort to learn about the state of the world. Broadly, these papers aim to understand what implications rational agent behavior has for the form of information cost functions. Ellis (2018) features axioms that focus on choice behavior and studies the im- plications for information cost functions, but further assumes that the agent learns by picking a partition of the state space. While MSSE uses the cost of learning the realized event of partitions as a primitive, the model studied in this paper does not constrain agents so that they must learn using partitions of the state space, and it can be shown that it is never optimal for the agent to choose an information strategy that is equivalent to a partition of the state space (Walker-Jones, 2019).3 Closer in nature to the work done in this paper, Pomatto, Strack, and Tamuz (2019) develop axioms that focus directly on the costs of information. Axioms that focus on costs of information are interesting because intuitive properties for costs of information can lead to unintuitive agent behavior that is compelling given real- world observations (Gigerenzer & Todd, 1999), but is often mistaken for irrational when axioms that appear rational are imposed on behavior. MSSE, for instance, 3This is true whenever the agent does some learning, and they have a positive probability of a posterior that is different than their prior. 4 predicts 'non-compensatory' behavior, whereby changing an option so that it is more valuable to the agent can result in a lower chance of it being selected, as is discussed by (Walker-Jones, 2019). This type of behavior raises important questions for welfare and counterfactual analysis, making effective policy design more challenging. Unlike the work of Pomatto et al. (2019), which features axioms that are con- cerned with probabilistic experiments that can result in different outcomes in the same state of the world, this paper's axioms are concerned with deterministic exper- iments (questions) that always result in the same outcome in a given state of the world, and contradict the form of constant marginal cost assumed in their paper. 1.2 Organization of Paper The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces Shan- non Entropy, discusses models of RI, and provides motivating examples. Section 3 proposes five new axioms, and uses them to develop a more flexible cost of acquir- ing information, MSSE, which features perceptual distance. Section 4 uses MSSE as a benchmark with which to price inattentive information strategies in a model of RI, and discusses the resultant agent behavior. Section 5 discusses the relation- ship between RU models and the agent behavior found in Section 4, and revisits the motivating examples from Section 2.1 and Section 2.2. Section 6 concludes. 2 Rational Inattention and Shannon Entropy What follows is intended to introduce the Shannon Entropy model of rational inattention to those that are not familiar with it. If you are familiar with said model, you can skip to Section 2.1. In the rational inattention (RI) literature, learning by the agent is typically modelled as the choice of a signal structure. The agent chooses the probability of receiving different signals in different states of the world. Receiving a signal updates 5 the agent's belief about the state of the world, giving them a more informed posterior belief. More informative signal structures are more costly for the agent, but allow them to make a more informed decision about which option to select. Suppose that the uncertainty faced by the agent is described by a measurable space (Ω, F ), where Ω is a finite set of possible states of the world (the state space), and F is the set of events generated by Ω (the power set of Ω). We call µ : F → [0, 1], which assigns probabilities to events, the prior distribution of the agent. Suppose that an agent who has stopped learning must make a selection from a set of options, denoted N = {1, . . . , N}. Each option, n ∈ N , in each state of the world, ω ∈ Ω, has a (finite) value to the agent vn(ω). The agent's problem is to maximize the expected value of the selected option less the cost of learning. They do this by choosing an information strategy F (s, ω) ∈ ∆(R × Ω), which is a joint distribution between s, the observed signal, and the states of the world.4 The only restriction on the information strategy is that the marginal, F (ω) : F → R+, must equal the prior µ. Alternatively, an agent can select a probability measure F (sω) : R → R+ for each ω ∈ Ω, which, combined with µ, determine both F (s, ω) and the posterior F (ωs). It is a property of the cost function for information derived in this paper, as is true with Shannon Entropy, that if F (s, ω) is optimal, then the agent is done learning after a single signal s. After the signal is realized, the agent simply picks the action with the highest expected value: a(sF ) = arg max n∈N EF (ωs)[vn(ω)]. Ignoring the cost of learning momentarily, the value to the agent of receiving a signal 4The decision to allow s to be any real number is rather arbitrary. This is a much richer signal space than is required in practice. We show later that an optimal strategy only results in one of at most N different signals s being observed. 6 s, which induces posterior F (ωs), is then: V (sF ) = max n∈N EF (ωs)[vn(ω)]. Let the expected cost of a particular information strategy, given the agent's prior, be denoted C(F (s, ω), µ). We describe the form of the cost functions studied in this paper in Section 4. The agent's problem can thus be written: max F ∈∆(R×Ω)Xω∈ΩZs V (sF )F (dsω)µ(ω) − C(F (s, ω), µ), such that ∀ω ∈ Ω : Zs F (ds, ω) = µ(ω). The choice behavior the agent exhibits depends on the cost function for infor- mation. Shannon Entropy is a measure of uncertainty with an axiomatic foundation that can be used to assign costs to information. If we are given a partition of the possible states of the world P = {A1, . . . , Am}, and probability measure µ over these events, the uncertainty about which event has occurred, as measured by Shannon Entropy, is defined:5 H(P, µ) = − m Xi=1 µ(Ai) log(µ(Ai)). (1) The convention used here is to set 0 log(0) = 0. If an agent has prior µ about the state of the world, and their beliefs are updated to the posterior µ(·s) after they receive a signal s, then there is a change in the uncertainty as measured by Shannon Entropy. In the Shannon model of RI, the cost of an information strategy F (s, ω) is measured as the expected reduction in total 5This measure is only unique up to a positive multiplier. 7 uncertainty as measured by Shannon Entropy: EhH(P, µ) − H(P, µ(·s))i, where P = {{ω1}, {ω2}, . . . , {ωn}}. Bayes rule, and the nature of Shannon Entropy, guarantee that every potential information strategy has a weakly positive cost. 2.1 Example 1: Perceptual Distance and Problems with Pre- dictions Caplin et al. (2017, p. 19) show that Shannon Entropy results in choice behavior that satisfies "invariance under compression." That is, when Shannon Entropy is used to measure information, if there are two states of the world, ω1 and ω2, across which payoffs are identical for each option (vn(ω1) = vn(ω2) ∀n ∈ N ), then the chance of each option being selected is the same in ω1 and ω2. The invariance under compression that is predicted by Shannon Entropy is, unfortunately, not found in many settings, as is shown by the work of Dean and Neligh (2019). The intuition for why invariance under compression may not be present in every choice environment is demonstrated by the following example. Consider an environment where an agent is faced with a screen that shows 100 balls, each of which is either red or blue. The agent is offered a prize that they may either accept (option 1), or reject to get a payoff of zero (option 2). The agent is told that if the majority of the balls on the screen are blue then the prize is y ∈ R++, and if the majority of the balls on the screen are red then the prize is −y. Suppose further that the agent is also told that there is a 1/4 chance of four different states of the world in which there are either 40, 49, 51, or 60 red balls, as is described in Table 1. The Shannon RI model, which imposes invariance under compression, predicts that the agent has the same chance of selecting option 1 when there are 40 red balls as 8 Table 1: Example 1 State: ω1 ω2 ω3 ω4 Balls in State: 60 Blue & 40 Red 51 Blue & 49 Red 49 Blue & 51 Red 40 Blue & 60 Red Probability of State: Value of selecting option 1: Value of selecting option 2: 1/4 y 0 1/4 y 0 1/4 -y 0 1/4 -y 0 when there are 49 red balls, and that the agent has the same chance of selecting option 1 when there are 60 red balls as when there are 51 red balls. This predicted behavior is not intuitive because it should be easier for the agent to differentiate between the states that are more different (40 versus 60 red balls) than the states that are more similar (49 versus 51 red balls). One should instead expect that the chance that option 1 is selected is decreasing in the number of red balls, as is demonstrated by the experiments of Dean and Neligh (2019), because it should be easier to determine which color of ball constitutes the majority the more of that color ball there are. Why does Shannon Entropy impose this type of behavior? In short, Shannon Entropy results in invariance under compression because of Shannon's third axiom (Shannon, 1948). In the context of Example 1, let P = {{ω1}, {ω2}, {ω3}, {ω4}}, and P = {{ω1 ∪ ω2}, {ω3 ∪ ω4}}, be two partitions of the state space. Shannon's third axiom requires that total uncertainty about the state of the world, which is the uncertainty about which event in P has occurred, be equal to the uncertainty about which event in P has occurred, plus the expected amount of uncertainty that remains about which event in P has occurred after we have learned which event in P has occurred. This equality means that the reduction in uncertainty caused by a signal is equal to the reduction in uncertainty about which event in P has occurred, plus the expected reduction in uncertainty about which event in P has occurred given which event in P has occurred. The agent is only concerned with which event in P has occurred, as this fully determines payoffs. Given which event in P has occurred, the agent does not care which event in P has occurred. If agent behavior is different in ω1 compared to ω2, or ω3 compared to ω4, so that their behavior does not satisfy invariance under 9 compression, then the agent is, to an extent, differentiating between these states, and paying for information that does not benefit them, and their information strategy is thus not optimal. While other information cost functions do not require that choice behavior sat- isfies invariance under compression (Caplin et al., 2017; Morris & Yang, 2016), they lack the tractability and flexibility of Shannon Entropy,6 which limits the potential for their application. This has led to the following open question: "what workable alternative models allow for the complex behavioral patterns identified in practice?" (Caplin et al., 2017, p. 2), a question that this paper attempts to answer. 2.2 Example 2: Perceptual Distance and Biases in Fitting If different perceptual distances are present in the same choice environment, a RU model may be susceptible to a form of informational bias that has not previously been identified, as demonstrated by the following example. This is significant for those who wish to conduct welfare or counterfactual analysis because there are many economically significant examples where, for instance, one option is easier to learn about, as in Example 2. Consider a choice environment where an agent has two options: option 1 and option 2, which can each be of high value H, or low value L < H, as is described in Table 2. Assume, contrary to what is possible with Shannon Entropy, that learning the value of option 1 is less costly than learning the value of option 2.7 For example, perhaps the agent is interested in investing in one of two businesses that are a priori identical except for the fact that one is local and easier to learn about, while the other is foreign and harder to learn about. It is not difficult to come up with other similar 6Shannon Entropy has a number of mathematical properties that make it easy to use for predicting behavior in a wide range of environments. 7With Shannon Entropy it is not possible for the cost of learning the value of option 1 to differ from the cost of learning the value of option 2. Each option realizes each of its two values with equal probabilities, and with Shannon Entropy it is not possible to have different perceptual distances in the same choice environment. 10 Table 2: Example 2 State: Probability of State: ω1 1/4 Value of selecting option 1: H Value of selecting option 2: H ω2 1/4 H L ω3 1/4 L H ω4 1/4 L L examples. Because payoffs are symmetric, any knowledge about the value of option 1 has the same value to the agent as the same knowledge about option 2. Further, the cost of said information about option 1 is lower. As such, while the marginal benefit of information about option 1 or option 2 is the same, the marginal cost of information about option 1 is lower. We should thus expect research of a rational agent to be more attentive to option 1. If the agent was deciding between investing in two businesses that are a priori identical, except one is local and easier to learn about, while the other is foreign and harder to learn about, then we should expect the agent to be more attentive to the local business. If both option 1 and option 2 have realized their high value H, we should expect that the agent is more likely to select option 1. Our intuition is that the agent should be more attentive to option 1, and thus should be more cognisant of option 1's high value, and more likely to select it. Similarly, if option 1 and option 2 have both realized their low value L, then we should expect that the agent is more likely to select option 2.8 Because of this, if an econometrician, who does not know that the two options have the same value distribution, tried to deduce the two values of option 1, H1 and L1, and the two values of option 2, H2 and L2, using a multinomial logit regression, they would decide that H1 is more than the true value H, and that L1 is less than the true value L (as is shown rigorously in Section 5). Fitting thus falls prey to an informational bias, undermining the value of any counterfactual or welfare analysis. 8Our intuition is that the agent should be more attentive to option 1, and thus should be more cognisant of option 1's low value, and less likely to select it. 11 This type of bias has not previously been identified in the literature on RI. Let Pr(nω) denote the probability that the agent selects option n in state ω. Let Pr(n) = Pω Pr(nω)µ(ω) denote the unconditional probability that option n is se- lected. Matejka and McKay (2015) show that fitting of multinomial logit results in the value of an option n to be biased by log(Pr(n) · N) in all states ω, where N is the number of available options. The bias found by Matejka and McKay (2015) can be identified by examining the unconditional choice probabilities of the agent because the driving mechanism is that the cost of learning causes the agent to be biased towards options that they have a higher chance of selecting a priori. The bias previously found by Matejka and McKay (2015) is fundamentally different than the bias demonstrated in this example because their bias does not allow for an option to be over valued in some states and under valued in others, which is in contrast with our setting where option 1 is over valued when it is of high value, and is undervalued when it is of low value. An econometrician who observes equal unconditional choice probabilities in this environment, as is predicted in this setting by the model developed in this paper, might be tempted conclude, based on the previous literature, that their analysis is not susceptible to informational biases since each option has the same chance of being selected a priori, so the bias of option n is log(Pr(n) · N) = log( 1 2 · 2) = 0 ∀n, and thus any counterfactual or welfare analysis that they conduct is valid. This conclusion may not be correct given the results in this paper. Further, RU models and RI models with Shannon Entropy can both be rejected for RI with MSSE in this environment if we are able to alter the correlation between the values of the two options. If a RU model describes the agent, then changing the correlation between the values of the two options would not change the choice behavior of the agent. If the behavior of the agent is instead described by MSSE, then changing the correlation between the values of the two options would change the choice behavior of the agent in individual states. This effect is because the total 12 information that can be acquired from learning the value of option 1 (the option that is easier to learn about) changes with the correlation of the options' values. Further, if the above MSSE specification is correct, the unconditional choice probabilities of the agent would remain constant when correlation is changed due to the symmetry of the environment, as long as the agent is doing some learning.9 Finally, if the behavior of the agent is instead described by Shannon Entropy, then the choice behavior in the individual states could only change if the unconditional choice probabilities changed, which is not the case with MSSE. With MSSE, since choice probabilities in a state can be impacted by choice probabilities that are conditioned on some larger subset of states, not only payoffs and unconditional choice probabilities, choice probabilities in a state can change even when payoffs and unconditional choice probabilities do not. 3 Multisource Shannon Entropy (MSSE) In this section we use axioms to develop this paper's measure of uncertainty. The goal of our axioms are to measure the total amount of uncertainty, which is the expected cost to the agent of perfectly observing the state of the world. The measure of total uncertainty that we develop can then be used to study a rationally inattentive agent because the cost of a noisy information strategy can be taken to be the expected reduction in total uncertainty, as is frequently done with Shannon Entropy in models of RI. Thus, while this paper is interested in studying an inattentive agent that only partially learns about the state of the world, this section discusses an attentive agent that perfectly observes the state of the world. 3.1 Formal Setting As was mentioned in Section 2, we are interested in an agent who is researching a measurable space (Ω, F ). Ω is a finite set of possible states of the world. F is the 9The agent is doing some learning if their choice probabilities differ at all in states of the world that are realized with positive probability. 13 set of events generated by Ω. One natural way to think about an agent learning is through a series of questions that have answers that are uniquely determined by the state of the world. These are questions that you can answer if you know the state of the world. How do we model such questions? A partition P of a state space Ω is a set of more than one disjoint events in F whose union is Ω. Notice that our definition of a partition excludes trivial partitions that only contain a single event. A question with multiple potential answers is thus equivalent to a partition whenever the answer to the question is deterministically determined by the state of the world. This equivalence occurs since every state space we consider has finite possible states of the world, so every such question must have a finite number of answers, and we can simply group states of the world based on the answer to the question they produce. Because we are concerned with questions that have answers that are deterministically determined by the state of the world, the words 'question' and 'partition' can be used interchangeably. The simplest kind of question in this setting is a yes or no question. A yes or no question is equivalent to a binary partition P b of Ω, which we define as a set of two events, P b = {A1, A2}, such that A1 ∪ A2 = Ω, and A1 ∩ A2 = ∅. The two phrases 'binary partition' and 'yes or no question' can thus be used interchangeably. If ω ∈ Ω is the state of the world, let the realized event of the partition P = {A1, . . . , Am} be denoted by P(ω), that is P(ω) = Ai ∈ {A1, . . . , Am} iff ω ∈ Ai. Given a probability measure µ : F → R+, and some partition P, let C(P, µ) denote the cost of learning the realized event P(ω) of P. C(P, µ), the cost of answering 'What is the realized event of P?', given the agent's prior belief, is the basic building block of this paper. A learning strategy, S = (P1, . . . , Pn), is a list of partitions whose realized events are successively observed by the agent such that if Pi, Pj ∈ S, and i 6= j, then Pi 6= Pj. A 'learning strategy' is thus 'a series of questions', and the two phrases can 14 be used interchangeably. If a learning strategy consists of only binary partitions, we call it a binary learning strategy, and denote it Sb = (P b 1, . . . , P b n). The order of the questions in a learning strategy is important, and changing the order results in a different learning strategy. If, for instance, some questions are more costly for the agent to answer, and help to identify states that are seldom observed, then it may seem efficient for a learning strategy to leave these questions towards the end. The order of the events in a partition, in contrast, is not important, and switching the order in which the events in a partition are listed does not result in a different partition. Define C(S, µ), the expected cost of a learning strategy S = (P1, . . . , Pn), given a probability measure µ, to be the sum of the expected costs of each of the questions in S: C(S, µ) = C(P1, µ) + E(cid:20)C(cid:16)P2, µ(·P1(ω))(cid:17) + · · · + C(cid:16)Pn, µ(·∩n−1 i=1 Pi(ω))(cid:17)(cid:21). Our definition of C(S, µ) thus imposes a form of constant marginal cost onto learn- ing strategies because over the course of their learning strategy the agent does not fatigue, nor do they gain experience with research and become better at learning: all that matters for determining the cost of each question are the beliefs of the agent immediately before the question is answered, and not how much has previously been learned. If P = {A1, . . . , Am} is a partition, let σ(P) denote the σ-algebra generated by P, which is the smallest σ-algebra that contains all the events A1, . . . , Am in P (which is also the power set of the events in P, since P is a partition). In general, if B is any collection of partitions, let σ(B) denote the σ-algebra generated by B, which is the smallest σ-algebra containing all the events in each of the partitions in B. Since a learning strategy S = (P1, . . . , Pn) is a collection of partitions, we thus use σ(S) to denote the σ-algebra generated by S. Sometimes a single question can be as informative as several questions. We say 15 a learning strategy S is equivalent to a partition P if σ(S) = σ(P), and we say that a series of questions is equivalent to a particular question if the learning strategy that represents the series of questions is equivalent to the partition that represents the particular question. What σ(S) = σ(P) means intuitively is that, for any prior probability measure µ : F → R+, observing the answers to the series of questions in S always leads to the same posterior as observing the answer to the question 'what is the realized event of the partition P?'. We can thus read σ(S) = σ(P) as saying that, for all priors, S and P provide the same amount of information to the agent. Let S(P){Sσ(S) = σ(P)} denote the set of learning strategies that are equivalent to P, and let Sb(P) = {Sbσ(Sb) = σ(P)} denote the set of binary learning strategies that are equivalent to P. 3.2 Axioms What form should a cost function for information take? This difficult question does not have an obvious answer, so this paper takes an axiomatic approach. The axioms make explicit the structure that is imposed on our cost function. Each axiom is meant to be normatively appealing, and can be separately evaluated in different contexts, either empirically, or through introspection, to determine how appropriate it is. Further, the axioms help demonstrate to those that are familiar with Shannon's original axioms (1948) the differences between MSSE and standard Shannon Entropy. When an agent learns in an inattentive fashion, and only acquires some of the available information, they reduce the amount that remains to be learned, and thus reduce the subsequent cost of learning the state of the world. The cost of the inattentive learning done by the agent can thus simple be measured as the reduction in the cost of learning the state of the world, as subsequent sections discuss,10 as long as we can establish the cost of learning the state of the world for different probability 10We argue later in the paper that the application of Shannon Entropy can be interpreted in this same fashion. 16 measures. Thus, while the learning of an agent is frequently inattentive, and this paper wishes to study environments where the agent only partially learns about the state of the world, this section discusses an attentive agent that tries to perfectly observes the state of the world. We do this because we want our axioms to be normatively appealing, and we find axioms about perfectly observing the state of the world to be a more intuitive, and hence easier to evaluate normatively, than axioms that focus directly on inattentive behavior, describing costs of different kinds of stochastic experiments. Another interpretation of this strategy is that, while the primitive of our model is the cost of learning the realized events of partitions, and the agent could choose to learn through such partitions of the state space, we do not constrain the agent's choice of information strategy so that they must learn through such partitions, and they can instead choose a noisy signal structure if they desire. We now state the five axioms required to achieve this paper's measure of uncer- tainty, the cost of perfectly learning the state of the world: Axiom 1 (Efficient Yes or No Questions): Given a partition P, for all probability measures µ: C(P, µ) ≥ min Sb∈Sb(P) C(Sb, µ). In plain language, Axiom 1 says that for any question P, there are a series of yes or no question Sb, that provide the same amount of information as P, and can be asked instead for the same cost or less. This assertion allows us to focus on series of yes or no questions without loss when we try to determine the cost to the agent of learning the state of the world, which is supported by research in the psychology and psychophysics literatures. Eye tracking analysis shows that when agents are faced with multiple options, they successively compare pairs of the options along a single attribute dimension (Noguchi & Stewart, 2014, 2018). This suggests that, in practice, agents are break- 17 ing their learning into a number of smaller queries. Further, in the psychology literature these pairwise comparisons are frequently modelled as ordinal in nature (Noguchi & Stewart, 2018), equivalent to questions with binary outcomes, e.g. 'Is option a better than option b in dimension x?', instead of more complicated ques- tions, e.g. 'How much better is option a than option b in dimension x?', because findings in the field of psychophysics suggest that agents are good at discriminat- ing stimuli, but are not good at determining the magnitude of the same stimuli (Stewart, Chater, & Brown, 2006). Before we introduce the rest of our axioms, we pause to discuss learning strategy invariance, a concept that helps us to make it explicit what we are assuming with the rest of our axioms. In general, a particular question P, and an equivalent series of questions S, may produce different expected costs depending on what questions are selected, and how they are ordered in S. A given question P, however, may have the peculiar property that, given any prior, all series of questions that are equivalent to it have the same expected cost. If a question has this strong property, we say it is learning strategy invariant. Formally, we say a partition P is learning strategy invariant, if for each probability measure µ, the expected cost C(S, µ) is the same for every learning strategy S that is equivalent to P. In many environments there are questions that are not learning strategy in- variant. Consider the environment described in Example 2 in Section 2.2. In this context, let A1 = {ω1, ω2}, A2 = {ω1, ω3}, P b 2}. 1 = {A1, Ac 1}, and P b 2 = {A2, Ac Notice that observing the realized event of P b 1 is equivalent to learning the value of option 1, and observing the realized event of P b 2 is equivalent to learning the value of option 2. Now, let P3 = {{ω1}, {ω2}, {ω3}, {ω4}} denote our partition of the state space. Notice that the learning strategy Sb = (P b 1, P b 2) is equivalent to P3, because if we answer 'What is the value of option 1?', and then answer 'What is the value of option 2?', we have observed the state of the world. Based on our discussion in Section 2.2, however, we should expect that P3 may 18 not be learning strategy invariant. Consider Sb = (P b 2, P b 1), which is also equivalent to P3. If the value of option 1 and option 2 were perfectly correlated, then observing the value of one of them would tell you the value of the other. The cost of Sb would then be the cost of observing the value of option 1, which we assumed to be less than the cost of observing the value of option 2, which is then the cost of Sb. A set of partitions that are certainly learning strategy invariant, in contrast, is the set of binary partitions. If P b is a binary partition, then P b is learning strategy invariant because the only learning strategy S such that σ(S) = σ(P b), is S = (P b). Thus, for any µ, all learning strategies S such that σ(S) = σ(P b) have the same expected cost C(S, µ) = C(P b, µ). Axiom 1 means that it is without loss for us to think about an agent learning through binary partitions. Since binary partitions are learning strategy invariant, it is thus without loss for us to consider the agent learning through learning strategy invariant partitions. As such, our four remaining axioms are only concerned with the costs of questions that are learning strategy invariant. These axioms are thus rather weak in nature, only imposing structure onto the costs of a particular kind of question that already features a lot of structure. We eventfully interpret different earning strategy invariant partitions as corresponding to different information sources, hence the name MSSE. Axiom 2 (More States are Harder to Differentiate): If a partition P is a learn- ing strategy invariant, and µ is a probability measure such that n events {Ai}n i=1 ⊂ P are given probability 1/n, while µ is a probability measure such that n + 1 events {Bj}n+1 j=1 ⊆ P are given probability 1/(n + 1), then C(P, µ) < C(P, µ). In plain language, Axiom 2 says that it is cheaper to use a given learning strat- egy invariant partition to differentiate between fewer more likely states than it is to differentiate between more less likely states. Axiom 3 (Continuity): If a partition P is learning strategy invariant, there are 19 two probability measures µ and µ assign positive probability to the same events in P, and µα is defined for each α ∈ [0, 1] so that µα(ω) = αµ(ω) + (1 − α)µ(ω) for all ω ∈ Ω, then C(P, µα) changes continuously in α. In plain language, Axiom 3 says that if the events that are given a positive probability of occurring in a learning strategy invariant partition P do not change, then the cost of learning which event in P has occurred, C(P, µ), should change continuously with respect to µ. This is intuitive since small changes in the chances of events occurring should not result in a large change in the cost of a question that differentiates between said events, if which events are possible does not change. Axiom 4 (Measurement): If a partition P is learning strategy invariant, then C(P, µ) is measurable with respect to σ(P). In plain language, Axiom 4 says that if P is learning strategy invariant, then the expected cost of the question represented by P should be fully determined by the chance that each of its answers occurs. If we know the question that is being asked, and the the chance of each of its answers, then we know the expected cost of asking the question, we do not require any additional information. Our next axiom, Axiom 5, addresses the subjective nature of the state space. To ease exposition, we first introduce some new definitions. A finite state space Ω is coarser than another finite state space Ω, if each state in Ω corresponds to an event in the set of events generated by Ω. In other words, a finite state space Ω is coarser than another finite state space Ω, if each state in Ω corresponds to a union of states in Ω. We say the state space Ω is finer than Ω, if Ω is coarser than Ω. Similarly, a partition P of a state space Ω is coarser than a partition P of the same state space Ω, if each event in P corresponds to a union of events in P. We say a partition P is finer than a partition P if P is coarser than P. Notice that if P is a partition of a state space Ω, and a state space Ω is finer than Ω, then P is also a partition of Ω, since each event in P is an event in the event space generated by both Ω and Ω. 20 In practice, 'the' state space Ω is determined by the researcher and the appli- cation, and referring to it as 'the' state space is typically a misnomer. Sometimes the researcher uses just enough states so that the payoff function is measurable, as in Example 2, and other times the researcher includes more states than are required for measuring the payoff function because it is deemed relevant to the agent, as in Example 1. In Example 1, however, the four 'states' we describe are not actually states, they are events in some richer underlying state space. Two realizations of the 'state' of the world in which 51 blue balls appear may differ from each other because the balls may appear in a different order, which may be relevant for the agent's cost of learning.11 Further, a change in the payoff function may necessitate the descrip- tion of a richer state space. While our description of the state space can change, the reality of the agent does not, and the cost of asking certain questions should not change based on the subjective modelling decisions of the researcher. Thus, when we consider the cost of learning the outcomes of a learning strategy invariant partition P, our cost should not reject the potential that there is another learning strategy in- variant partition P of a more detailed finite state space Ω. This notion is summarized in Axiom 5. Axiom 5 (Subdivision): If a partition P = {A1, . . . , Am} of a state space Ω is learning strategy invariant, then for any n > m, C(P, µ) does not rule out that there is a finer state space Ω, of which there is a learning strategy invariant partition P = { A1, . . . , An}, which is finer than P. In plain language, Axiom 5 says that we do not want to impose a cost function onto a limited dataset that rules out finer learning strategy invariant partitions on a more detailed finite state space. Axiom 5 is important because it allows us to consider 11Imagine that the 100 balls from Example 1 are displayed on the screen in ten rows of ten, and that 51 are blue. If the position of the red and blue balls appears random, it would seem intuitive that it is more costly for the agent to learn whether or not the the majority of the ball are blue compared to the setting where the top five rows all consist of ten blue balls, and in the bottom ten rows there is one blue ball and the rest are red. 21 learning strategy invariant partitions with arbitrarily many events, even when our state space Ω has relatively few states, which is crucial for the proof of Theorem 1. The first result that we show using our axioms is that if P is a leaning strategy invariant partition, then C(P, µ) is constant with respect to permutations of the probability measure µ. If P = {A1, . . . , Am} is a leaning strategy invariant partition, we say that µ is a permutation of µ on P if there is a bijection π : {1, . . . , m} → {1, . . . , m} such that ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , m}, µ(Ai) = µ(Aπ(i)). Lemma 1. If a partition P is learning strategy invariant, and C satisfies Axiom 4, and Axiom 5, then if µ is a permutation of µ on P, C(P, µ) = C(P, µ). Proofs for results in Section 3 and can be found in Appendix 1 The second result that we show using our axioms helps demonstrate the differ- ence between MSSE and standard Shannon Entropy. Lemma 2. If a partition P is learning strategy invariant, and C satisfies Axiom 2, Axiom 3, Axiom 4, and Axiom 5, then there exists a multiplier λ(P) ∈ R++, such that for all probability measures µ: C(P, µ) = λ(P)H(P, µ), where H is Shannon's standard measure of entropy (1948), defined in equation (1). Underlying each learning strategy invariant partition is some information source that allows the agent to differentiate between the events that comprise the partition. Shannon (1948) imposes learning strategy invariance onto all partitions of Ω, which implies that all partitions have the same costs associated with them (there is a λ > 0 such that λ(P) = λ for all partitions P of Ω), and so it is without loss to think of the agent as learning from a single information source that allows them to differentiate between the different states of the world. With MSSE, in contrast, different learning strategy invariant partitions are allowed to have different costs associated with them (λ(P) may differ depending on the learning strategy invariant partition P), and thus it is natural to think of the agent as learning different pieces of information from 22 different sources depending on which source allows them to acquire the information at the lowest costs, as is formalized by Theorem 1. This interpretation is how MSSE gets its name. 3.3 Total Uncertainty Lemma 2 tells us that for each binary partition P b, there is an associated multiplier, λ(P b) ∈ R++, such that for all probability measures µ: C(P b, µ) = λ(P b)H(P b, µ). Since there are a finite number of binary partitions of Ω, we can order the binary partitions by their associated multipliers. Let λ1 denote the multiplier associated with all binary partitions, denoted {P b,λ1 }n1 i=1, with the lowest multiplier. i If the agent can always learn the state of the world by asking questions with multiplier λ1, then σ({P b,λ1 multiplier associated with all binary partitions, denoted {P b,λ2 }n1 i=1) = F , and we let M=1.12 If not, let λ2 denote the }n2 i=1, with the second i i lowest multiplier. If the agent can always learn the state of the world by asking questions with multipliers λ1 or λ2, then σ({P b,λ1 let λ3 denote the multiplier associated with all binary partitions, denoted {P b,λ3 }n2 i=1) = F , and we let M = 2. If not, i=1, {P b,λ2 }n1 i i }n3 i=1, i with the third lowest multiplier. Continue in this fashion until we let λM denote the multiplier associated with all binary partitions, denoted {P b,λM i }nM i=1, with the lowest multiplier such that the state of the world is always revealed when all questions with equal or lower associated multi- pliers are asked, that is, the lowest M such that: σ({P b,λ1 i i=1, . . . , {P b,λM }n1 i }nM i=1) = F . To help make our notation more compact, we can use a group of partitions to generate a finer partition: if (P1, . . . , Pm) is a group of partitions, let ×{Pi}n i=1 de- note the partition such that σ(×{Pi}n let Pλj = ×{P b,λj }nj i=1. i i=1) = σ(P1, . . . , Pn). Then, for j ∈ {1, . . . , M},13 12If M =1, then MSSE collapses to standard Shannon Entropy. 13M is defined in the proceeding paragraphs. 23 MSSE incorporates different perceptual distances because it allows for different events to be different distances from each other. Events in Pλ1, for instance, have greater perceptual distances between them than events in PλM (assuming M > 1). Since Ω is a partition of itself, we can, as a minor abuse of notation, let S(Ω) = {Sσ(S) = F } denote the set of learning strategies such that σ(S) = σ(Ω) = F . Theorem 1. If C satisfies all five axioms, then there exist partitions Pλ1, . . . , PλM as defined above, and constants λ1 < . . . < λM , such that for any probability measure µ on F min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) = λ1H(cid:16)Pλ1, µ(cid:17)+E(cid:20)λ2H(cid:16)Pλ2, µ(·Pλ1(ω))(cid:17)+· · ·+λMH(cid:16)PλM , µ(·∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))(cid:17)(cid:21), where H is defined as in equation (1). In plain language, Theorem 1 says that if the cost of learning satisfies all five axioms, then the cheapest way (in expectation) to learn the state of the world always involves first asking all the yes or no questions with the lowest associated multiplier (in any order), then asking all the yes or no questions with the second lowest multiplier, and continuing in this fashion until the state of the world has been realized. Theorem 1 generates the more flexible measure of uncertainty that we desired for studying inattentive behavior. If the agent starts with a prior µ, and does optimal learning that reaches a posterior µ, then we let the cost of this inattentive research be the reduction in the cost of perfectly learning the state of the world, as is discussed in the next section. In terms of Shannon's original context, this paper's model can be thought of as describing learning of information from M sources, where source i, for i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , M}, is capable of providing information about Pλi(ω). Shannon's origi- nal axioms, in contrast, impose that all partitions P are learning strategy invariant, which is analogous to all binary partitions having the lowest multiplier, and there only being one information source relevant for learning. 24 The Pλi's that could be used in Theorem 1 are not unique, with the excep- tion of Pλ1. The versions described in the paragraphs preceding Theorem 1 are the unique coarsest partitions that could be used in the statement of the theorem. For i ∈ {2, . . . , M}, Pλi could, for instance, be replaced by Pλi = ×{Pλj }i j=1 in the statement of Theorem 1, which would constitute the unique finest representation of the partitions. The axiomatic derivation of the cost benchmark in this paper requires a discrete state space for the state of the world, as is the case with Shannon Entropy. If a continuous state space is desired for the state of the world, however, a measure of uncertainty for a continuous state space can be defined in an analogous manner to the measure of uncertainty defined in Theorem 1 for a discrete state space, which is similar to what is done by Shannon (1948) to apply Shannon Entropy in a continuous setting. 4 Inattentive Learning with MSSE The following section introduces and solves a model of RI that uses MSSE to measure the cost of acquiring information. We establish that our new more flexible measure of uncertainty can still be incorporated tractably into a model of RI, which is not an obvious result. Apart from the use of MSSE instead of Shannon Entropy for the measurement of uncertainty, this section follows the work of Matejka and McKay (2015) closely so as to aid comparison between the two models. Given our result in Theorem 1, we take the expected cost of a particular infor- mation strategy to be defined as: C(F (s, ω), µ) = E(cid:20) min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) − min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ(·s))(cid:21). A noisy information strategy reduces the total amount of uncertainty, and we thus measure the cost of such a noisy information strategy as the expected reduction in 25 total uncertainty. This interpretation can also be applied to RI models that use Shan- non Entropy to measure the cost of noisy information structures. Shannon Entropy is a measure of total uncertainty derived from axioms about the cost of successively learning the realized events of partitions, and in such models the cost of a noisy sig- nal is simply taken to be the reduction in total uncertainty, as measured by Shannon Entropy. The cost functions that can be defined as above with MSSE are in the class of uniformly posterior-separable cost functions described by Caplin et al. (2017). The behavior generated in static settings by such posterior-separable cost functions has been shown to be equivalent to the behavior generated by sequential information sam- pling in some dynamic contexts (H´ebert & Woodford, 2017; Morris & Strack, 2019). In particular, H´ebert and Woodford (2017) show that a class of static cost functions, which they call 'neighborhood-based' cost functions, can be micro-founded in this way. The cost functions explored in this paper that measure the reduction in MSSE are a strict subset of the neighborhood-based cost functions described in their paper, and thus the cost functions in this paper are micro-founded in two ways, directly through the axioms in this paper, and indirectly through the dynamic analysis conducted by H´ebert and Woodford (2017). While symmetry imposes a unique set of partitions in Example 1 when MSSE is used, there are numerous representations that can be used when a neighborhood-based cost function is assumed. H´ebert and Woodford (2017) suggest two ways of modelling the neighborhoods in such a setting, one of which is fitted by Dean and Neligh (2019), and neither of which is equivalent to the partitions suggested by MSSE. Huettner, Boyacı, and Ak¸cay (2019), in turn, create an ad hoc group of cost functions that are also a generalization of Shannon Entropy, but are a strict subset of the cost functions studied in this paper that measure reduction in MSSE. The cost functions studied by Huettner et al. (2019) allow for multiple perceptual distances, but are not capable of predicting the behavior we argued was intuitive in Example 1, 26 since in Example 1 their cost functions collapses to standard Shannon Entropy. 4.1 Rationally Inattentive Agent's Problem As was discussed in Section 2, when the agent faces a probability space (Ω, F , µ) and a set of options N, the agent's problem is to maximize the expected value of the option they select less the cost of learning by choosing an optimal information strategy, and subsequently selecting an option based on the signal produced by their information strategy. The agent's problem can thus be written: max F ∈∆(R×Ω)Xω∈ΩZs V (sF )F (dsω)µ(ω) − C(F (s, ω), µ), such that ∀ω ∈ Ω : Zs F (ds, ω) = µ(ω). (2) (3) The above problem is complicated and not particularly tractable, so we follow Matejka and McKay (2015) and re-write this problem directly in terms of the choice probabilities of the agent. This process requires the development of some new no- tation. Define S(nF ) = {s ∈ R : F (s) > 0, a(sF ) = n}, to be the set of signals that result in the agent selecting option n. Next, as was done in Section 2, define the chance of option n being selected conditional on the state of the world to be: Pr(nω) = Zs∈S(nF ) F (dsω), (4) and for event A ∈ F , define the chance of n being selected conditional on A being realized to be: Pr(nA) =Xω∈A Pr(nω)µ(ωA). (5) 27 Define the unconditional choice probability of option n to be: Pr(n) =Xω∈Ω Pr(nω)µ(ω). (6) Denote the collection {Pr(nω)}N n=1 by P. Using this notation, we can re-write the agent's problem: Lemma 3. Choice probabilities P are the outcome of a solution to the agent's problem in (2) subject to (3) iff they solve: max P Xn∈NXω∈Ω vn(ω)Pr(nω)µ(ω) − C(P, µ), such that: ∀ n ∈ N , Pr(nω) ≥ 0, ∀ ω ∈ Ω, Pr(nω) = 1 ∀ ω ∈ Ω, and Xn∈N where C(P, µ) is as defined in Lemma 9. Proofs for results in Section 4 and Section 5 can be found in Appendix 2 (7) (8) (9) This new problem, where the agent selects their conditional choice behavior P, is substantially easier to solve than the problem where the agent picks their information strategy F (s, ω). 4.2 Behavior of a Rationally Inattentive Agent Using Lemma 3, we can establish a necessary condition for the optimal behavior of the agent with Theorem 2, and then use said necessary condition to simplify the maximization problem undertaken by the agent with Corollary 1. Theorem 2: 28 If P is the solution to (7) subject to (8) and (9), then ∀ n ∈ N , and ∀ ω ∈ Ω, the probability that option n is selected in state w satisfies: Pr(nω) = Pr(n) λ1 λM Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ1 λM Pr(νPλ1(ω)) Pr(ν) Xν∈N λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(n ∩M −1 λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(ν ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) i=1 Pλi(ω)) λM λM −λM −1 λM e λM −λN −1 vn(ω) λM vν (ω) λM e . (10) Those familiar with the work of Matejka and McKay (2015) will recognize the above formula as the MSSE analogue of Matejka and McKay (2015)'s Theorem 1. When all partitions are learning strategy invariant, λ1 = λ2 = · · · = λM , and the above formula collapses to Matejka and McKay (2015)'s Theorem 1. With standard Shannon Entropy, the chance that the agent selects an option thus depends only on the unconditional chances of the options being selected, and the realized values of the options. With MSSE, in contrast, as the above formula indicates, the chance that the agent selects an option n in a particular state of the world ω depends on the unconditional chances of the options being selected, Pr(n), the realized values of the options vn(ω), as well as the probabilities of the options being selected in similar states of the world. Here 'similar states of the world' refers to states that induce the same realization of partitions with associated multipliers smaller than λM . It makes sense that when easier to observe pieces of information indicate that an option n is likely of above average value, that the agent should select option n with a higher probability, even if the above average value has not been realized. For a more complete discussion of the intuitive properties of the choice behavior described in Theorem 2, please see Appendix 3. Behavior that is consistent with Theorem 2 is not necessarily optimal because in many settings it is not optimal for the agent to consider all of the available options (choose them with positive probability), and though such a corner solution may be optimal, there are many corners that are consistent with Theorem 2 but are not 29 optimal. For instance, for any n ∈ N , if the agent selects n with probability one in all states of the world, then their behavior is consistent with Theorem 2, but it is easy to come up with examples where this would not be optimal for any n. Corollary 1: Conditional and unconditional choice probabilities described in (5) and (6) are a solution to (7) subject to (8) and (9) iff they comply with Theorem 2 and solve: Pr(n) λ1 λM Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) λM −λM −1 λM λM !µ(ω), e vn(ω) max P Xω∈Ω log Xn∈N such that: ∀ A ∈ F : Pr(nA) ≥ 0 ∀ n, Pr(nA) = 1. and Xn∈N Corollary 1 is helpful because it reduces the number of choice variables faced by the agent, which means it is easier for the researcher to find optimal agent behavior. When solving the problem described in Lemma 3, the agent must choose Pr(nω) for all n and ω. When solving the problem in Corollary 1, the agent must only choose Pr(nA) for all n and A ∈ ×{Pλi}M −1 i=1 , which is a coarser partition. In Example 2, for instance, if the agent tries to solve Lemma 3 they must pick their probabilities of selecting option 1 and option 2 in four different states of the world, while if they solve the problem in Corollary 1 they must only pick their probabilities of selecting option 1 and option 2 in two events, and then Theorem 2 dictates their choice probabilities in each state of the world. This reduction makes finding optimal behavior of the agent easier for the researcher because there are thus half as many choice variables when analysing Example 2 if Corollary 1 is used instead of Lemma 3. Any choice behavior that complies with Corollary 1 and Theorem 2 is optimal. This paper does not provide conditions for optimal behavior that are both necessary and sufficient, however, as is done by Caplin, Dean, and Leahy (2018) in a setting with standard Shannon Entropy. This may cause some to view finding optimal be- 30 havior with MSSE quite daunting. The necessary and sufficient conditions given by Caplin et al. (2018) in the setting with Shannon Entropy are appealing because they verify if behavior that satisfies the necessary conditions are in fact optimal, and provide insight into the formation of the agent's optimal consideration set, which is interesting in and of itself. In the more complicated setting studied in this paper, the necessary and sufficient conditions are less appealing. The reality is that almost any problem in this more complicated setting requires a computer for finding optimal behavior, but that is true in the standard setting as well, even with the conditions derived by Caplin et al. (2018). The good news is that the optimization problem that needs to be solved involves maximization of a strictly concave function over a compact domain, which is differentiable everywhere on the interior. Thus, standard steepest accent algorithms work well for solving the problem described in Corollary 1, even when the number of options in N and the number of events in ×{Pλi}M −1 i=1 are large. For those that are interested in a discussion of how MSSE changes the for- mation of optimal consideration sets, please see Walker-Jones (2019). Further, while Huettner et al. (2019) do attempt to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for optimal behavior in their setting, the conditions are incorrect, as is also discussed by Walker-Jones (2019). As is true in the setting with standard Shannon Entropy, optimal choice behavior may not be unique. If two options are known a priori to take the same value in each state of the world, for instance, then the agent can shift probability from one of these two options to the other whenever the former has a strictly positive probability of being selected in an optimal solution. While these sorts of environments are possible, generically optimal behavior is unique. This feature of optimal behavior should be evident since payoffs are linear, and costs are strictly convex. The exact sufficient conditions for the uniqueness of a solution are withheld, but for the solution not to be unique, similar to the case with Shannon Entropy studied by Matejka and McKay (2015), a very rigid form of co-movement is required between payoffs and states. 31 5 Comparisons with the Standard Model In this section we compare and contrast the choice behavior that is produced by RI with Shannon Entropy and the choice behavior produced by the RI model developed in Section 4 that uses the MSSE measure developed in Section 3. We first discuss the relationship between RU models and RI with MSSE, and then revisit the two motivating examples, Example 1 and Example 2, from Section 2. 5.1 Comparison with Random Utility Model It is standard practice to use a RU model to describe discrete choice settings. In such a model, the agent picks the option with the largest sum un = vn + ǫn over all options n ∈ N . Generally, un represents the value of the option to the agent, vn represents the average value of the option across agents, and ǫn represents an idiosyn- cratic value to the agent. The role ǫn plays is up to interpretation, however, and is determined by the researchers specification (Train, 2009). In a setting where agents are thought to be rationally inattentive, the above terms are interpreted in a different way because the agent's noisy behavior is generated by perceptual error instead of idiosyncratic differences in taste. In such settings, un represents the perceived value to the agent, vn represents the true value to the agent, and ǫn is interpreted as an un- observable perceptual error that results from the noisy information strategy selected by the agent. Woodford (2014) argues that this latter interpretation is necessary in many contexts due to the stochastic responses observed in perceptual discrimination tasks such as those administered by Dean and Neligh (2019), which are akin to our Example 1 in Section 2.1. While the interpretation of ǫn is relevant for welfare anal- ysis, it is inconsequential for the description of choice behavior. How then can MSSE be interpreted in terms of an RU framework, and what insights may be provided about the fitting of RU models? Matejka and McKay (2015) point out that choice probabilities predicted by RI 32 with Shannon Entropy correspond to multinomial logit choice probabilities where it is as if option values have been shifted due to the agent's prior about potential values. An option that seems more desirable a priori is more likely to be selected by the agent in every state of the world, and thus is overvalued by a multinomial logit regression. Rational inattention with MSSE takes this one step further, as is shown by Theorem 3, allowing the shift in perceived value to also depend on easier to observe information sources (binary partitions associated multipliers that are less than λM ). This flexibility seems natural in many real world environments. Consider an agent that is trying to select a restaurant to go to. One may expect that the chance of the agent selecting a given option to increase not only with the quality of the restaurant, and their prior impression of it, but also with easy to observe information such as on-line ratings the restaurant may have received. Theorem 3: The choice behavior described by P, a solution to (7) subject to (8) and (9), is identical to the behavior produced by an RU model where each option n ∈ N has perceived value: where vn = vn(ω) λM un = vn + αn + ǫn, , ǫn has an iid Gumbel distribution, and: αn = λ1 λM log(NPr(n))+ λ2−λ1 λM log(NPr(nPλ1(ω)))+· · ·+ λM −λM −1 λM log(NPr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))). Theorem 3 is meant to provide insight into the outcome of attempting to fit a RU model in an environment where agents are rationally inattentive with a cost function for information described by MSSE. Theorem 3 does not say that a model of RI with MSSE is equivalent to a RU model. Even if choice data from a given choice problem cannot be used to reject one for the other, across choice problems MSSE produces behavior that can reject the hypothesis of a RU model. With MSSE, for instance, as with standard Shannon Entropy, adding an option can increase the 33 chance of an existing option being selected, which is not possible with a RU model. Also, it is worth mentioning that since optimal behavior may result in some options being selected with probability zero, Theorem 3 implicitly defines each αn on the extended reals so that αn = −∞ if Pr(n) = 0.14 5.2 Example 1 Revisited We now revisit Example 1 from Section 2.1, which is described in Table 1. It seems natural that it should be easier for the agent to answer the question 'Are 60 of the balls blue?', than it is for them to answer 'Are 51 or more of the balls blue?'. Similarly, it seems natural that it should be easier for the agent to answer the question 'Are 60 of the balls red?', than it is for them to answer 'Are 51 or more of the balls red?'. Symmetry also means that the questions 'Are 60 of the balls blue?' and 'Are 60 of the balls red?' should have the same expected cost, and the questions 'Are 51 or more of the balls blue?' and 'Are 51 or more of the balls red?' should have the same expected cost. We can thus assume Pλ1 = {A1, A2, A3} = {{ω1}, {ω2 ∪ ω3}, {ω4}}, and Pλ2 = {{ω1 ∪ ω2}, {ω3 ∪ ω4}}. Solutions to Corollary 1 combined with Theorem 2 mean that the chance of the agent selecting option 1 is increasing in the number of blue balls, as can be seen in Figure 1, which depicts optimal behavior in each state of the world for a range of λ1. When λ1 is small relative to λ2 the agent chooses option 1 in state ω1 with a high probability, and choose option 2 in state ω4 with a high probability. The agent is thus better able to discern the state of the world when there are 40 of one color ball and 60 of the other than when there are 49 of one color and 51 of the other. This is supported by the experimental work of Dean and Neligh (2019), and is in contrast with the behavior predicted by a model of RI that uses Shannon Entropy. Morris and Yang (2016) identify a related issue with Shannon Entropy's lack of 14It can be shown that if optimal behavior results in Pr(n) > 0, then Pr(nω) > 0 ∀ω ∈ Ω. See (Walker-Jones, 2019). 34 perceptual distance, and warn against its use in some continuous settings because it predicts discontinuous changes in behavior at places where payoffs change discontinu- ously. In the limit, as the number of different perceptual distances is allowed to grow, MSSE can be used to produce the kind of continuous behavior that Morris and Yang (2016) desire. 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Figure 1: Optimal Conditional Behavior for Example 1: y=1, =1 2 Pr(1 1)=Pr(2 4) Pr(1 2)=Pr(2 3) Pr(1 3)=Pr(2 2) Pr(1 4)=Pr(2 1) 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.5 1 n o i t c e l e S f o y t i l i b a b o r P 5.3 Example 2 Revisited We now revisit Example 2 from Section 2.2, which is described in Table 2. We assumed that learning the value of option 1 is less costly than learning the value of option 2. That is to say, answering the question 'Is option 1 of value H?' has a lower expected cost to the agent than the question 'Is option 2 of value H?'. We can thus assume: Pλ1 = {A1, A2} = {{ω1 ∪ ω2}, {ω3 ∪ ω4}}, and Pλ2 = {{ω1 ∪ ω3}, {ω2 ∪ ω4}}. Solutions to Corollary 1 in this environment for a range of λ1 can be found in Figure 2, which shows that when λ1 is small compared to λ2, the agent selects option 35 Figure 2: 1 with a high probability when it is of value H, and selects option 2 with a high probability when option 1 is of value L. As λ1 increases relative to λ2, the chance of option 1 being selected when it is of value H decreases. Similarly, as λ1 increases relative to λ2, the chance of option 1 being selected when it is of value L increases. Note that the solutions to Corollary 1 mean that the agent is more likely to select option 1 when state ω1 has been realized since Pr(1A1) > Pr(2A1), and more likely to select option 2 when state ω4 has been realized since Pr(1A2) < Pr(2A2), as can be observed with Theorem 2. Solutions to Corollary 1 combined with Theorem 3 mean that if an econometri- cian tries to fit this environment with a multinomial logit model that their estimate of H1, the high value of option 1, is biased upwards by λ2−λ1 λ2 log(2Pr(1A1)), which is greater than zero since Pr(1A1) > 1/2, and their estimate of L1, the low value of option 1, is biased downwards by λ2−λ1 log(2Pr(1A2)), which is less than zero since λ2 Pr(1A2) < 1/2. These biases are despite the fact that the unconditional chance of 36 either option being selected is the same: Pr(1) = Pr(2) = 1/2. As such, the econome- trician may have believed their analysis was not susceptible to informational biases if they had used Shannon Entropy to model the environment. 6 Conclusion Rational inattention models that use Shannon Entropy to measure the cost of learning demonstrate that informational biases in random utility models can be sig- nificant for welfare and counterfactual analysis. The biases that have previously been identified in the literature are independent of the realized state of the world, depend- ing only on the agent's prior about the environment. These previously identified biases manifest themselves in the unconditional choice probabilities of the agent. This paper contributes to the literature by proposing and axiomatizing a new measure of uncertainty that features perceptual distance, maintains much of the tractability of Shannon's standard measure, and identifies a new kind of informa- tional bias. The new form of bias can be present even when the agent has the same unconditional chance of selecting each option, which may seem to indicate an unbiased environment based on the previous literature. 37 Appendix 1 Before we prove Lemma 1, we show some other useful results: Lemma 4. If a partition P is coarser than a learning strategy invariant partition P, then P is also learning strategy invariant. Proof. Suppose P is a learning strategy invariant partition, and P is coarser than P. If P = P we are done. If P 6= P, then the definition of learning strategy invariance tells us that for any learning strategy S = (P1, . . . , Pn) such that σ( S) = σ( P ), and any µ: C(P, µ) = C(( P, P), µ) = C( P, µ) + E[C(P, µ(· P(ω)))], and, C(P, µ) = C( S, µ) + E[C(P, µ(·∩n i=1Pi(ω)))] = C( S, µ) + E[C(P, µ(· P(ω)))]. Thus, C( P, µ) = C( S, µ) for all such S, and any µ, so P is also learning strategy invariant.(cid:4) Lemma 5. If P = {A1, . . . , Am} is a learning strategy invariant partition, proba- bility measure µ assigns a probability of one to an event Ai ∈ {A1, . . . , Am}, and C satisfies Axiom 5, then C(P, µ) = 0. Proof. Suppose P = {A1, . . . , Am} is a learning strategy invariant partition of the state space Ω, and there is an Ai ∈ {A1, . . . , Am} such that µ(Ai) = 1. It is without loss to further assume i = 1. If m > 2, or there is a learning strategy invariant partition P 6= P of Ω which is finer than P, then we can show Lemma 5 without any axioms. If m > 2, let P = {A1, A2, (A1 ∪ A2)c}, P = {A1 ∪ A2, A3, . . . , Am}, S1 = ( P, P), and S2 = ( P, P, P). The definition of learning strategy invariance tells us 38 C(S1, µ) = C(S2, µ), so C(P, µ) = 0. If m = 2, and learning strategy invariant partition P 6= P of Ω is finer than P, then let S1 = ( P), and S2 = (P, P). The definition of learning strategy invariance tells us C(S1, µ) = C(S2, µ), so C(P, µ) = 0. If m = 2, and there is not a learning strategy invariant P 6= P of Ω which is finer than P, then we can invoke Axiom 5, and use a similar argument as the previous paragraph to get the desired result (if C(P, µ) 6= 0 when µ assigns a probability of one to an event in P, then we are rejecting the potential of a finer learning strategy invariant partition, with three or more events in it, of some finer state space Ω)).(cid:4) Proof of Lemma 1. Suppose P = {A1, . . . , Am} is a learning strategy invariant partition of the state space Ω. If m > 2, or there is a partition P 6= P of Ω which is finer than P, then we can show Lemma 1 holds using only Axiom 4. Suppose m > 2. If we show that for any i, j ∈ {1, . . . , m} such that i 6= j, C(P, µ) = C(P, µ) if µ(Ak) = µ(Ak) for k /∈ {i, j}, µ(Ai) = µ(Aj), and µ(Aj) = µ(Ai), then the desired result holds, since a series of pairwise switches like this can be used to create any permutation desired. It is without loss to assume i = 1 and j = 2. Define P = {A1, A2, (A1 ∪ A2)c}. Notice that P must be learning strategy invariant based on Lemma 4. Further, if we show that C( P, µ) = C( P, µ), then C(P, µ) = C(P, µ), since, if we define P = {A1 ∪A2, A3, . . . , Am}, then by Axiom 4: C(P, µ) = C( P, µ) + E[C( P, µ(· P(ω)))] = C( P, µ) + E[C( P, µ(· P(ω)))] = C(P, µ). Now, let P b P b 2 and P b 1}, P b 1 = {A1, Ac 3, are all coarser than P. Then, since P is learning strategy invariant: 3 = {A1 ∪ A2, (A1 ∪ A2)c}. Notice P b 1, 2 = {A2, Ac 2}, and P b C( P, µ) = C(P b 3, µ) + E[C(P b 1, µ(·P b 1(ω))], 39 and, C( P, µ) = C(P b 3, µ) + E[C(P b 1, µ(·P b 1(ω))]. Notice that Axiom 4 tells us C(P b 3, µ) = C(P b 3, µ). So, all that remains to show is that if the probability measure ν is a permutation of the probability measure ν on P b 1, then C(P b 1, ν) = C(P b 1, ν). Fix arbitrary ν(A1) = x ∈ [0, 1]. Now consider the probability measures q1, q2, q3, such that: q1(A1) = x, q1(A2) = 0, q1((A1 ∪ A2)c) = 1 − x, q2(A1) = 0, q2(A2) = x, q2((A1 ∪ A2)c) = 1 − x, q3(A1) = 1 − x, q3(A2) = x, q3((A1 ∪ A2)c) = 0. Notice that q3 is a permutation of q1 on P b 1. So then, using Axiom 4, the definition of learning strategy invariance, and Lemma 5, all repeatedly: C(P b 1, q1) = C( P, q1) = C(P b 3, q1) = C(P b 3, q2) = C( P, q2) = C(P b 2, q2) = C(P b 2, q3) = C( P, q3) = C(P b 1, q3), and we are done. If m = 2, and there is a learning strategy invariant partition P 6= P of Ω which is finer than P, then the first half of the proof establishes permutations of the probability measure µ on P do not change C( P, µ). Denote P = {A1, A2}. By definition of a finer partition, there is Ai, Aj ∈ P such that Ai ⊆ A1 and Aj ⊆ A2. Define µ so that µ(Ai) + µ(Aj) = 1, and probability measure µ so that µ(Ai) = µ(Aj) and µ(Aj) = µ(Ai). Then, learning strategy invariance and Lemma 5 tell us: C(P, µ) = C( P, µ) = C( P, µ) = C(P, µ). 40 Thus, since this works for any such µ, Axiom 4 tells us permutations of µ on P do not change C(P, µ). If m = 2, and there is not a learning strategy invariant partition P 6= P of Ω which is finer than P, then we can invoke Axiom 5 and use a similar argument as the previous paragraph to get the desired result (if C(P, µ) is not constant with respect to permutations of µ on P, then we are rejecting the potential of a finer learning strategy invariant partition, with three or more events in it, of some finer state space Ω)).(cid:4) Proof of Lemma 2. For all partitions P = {A1, . . . , Am} and probability measures µ defined on P, define the reverse order statistic µ(P) = (µ(1)(P), . . . , µ(m)(P)) to be the unique vector of probabilities such that µ(1)(P) ≥ . . . ≥ µ(m)(P), and if we define probability measure µ so that µ(Ai) = µ(i)(P) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , Am}, then µ is a permutation of µ on P. 1, . . . , Aj Suppose Pi = {A1, . . . , Am} is a learning strategy invariant partition, and Pj = mj } is another learning strategy invariant partition such that Pi 6= Pi, and {Aj Pi is either finer or coarser than Pi. Lemma 1 and Axiom 4 tells us that C(P, µ) and C( P, µ) are fully determined by µ(P) and µ( P) respectively, and if the strictly positive entries of µ(P) and µ( P) are the same, then C(P, µ) = C( P, µ). What does this mean? This means that there is a function which maps from vectors of probabilities onto the reals, ci : ∪∞ j=i△j → R, where △j is the j simplex, such that for any learning strategy invariant partition Pi, such that Pi is either finer or coarser than Pi, then C( P, µ) = ci(µ( P)). We define ci on △j for arbitrarily large j because if there is a partition Pi of some finer state space Ω, that is finer than P, that is composed of j events, then ci is defined on △j, and if we assume ci is not defined on △j, we contradict Axiom 5. The rest of the proof follows the work of Shannon (1948) closely. Define h so for n ∈ N, h(n) ≡ ci(1/n, . . . , 1/n, 0). We do this for all n ∈ N so we do not violate 41 Axiom 5. Learning strategy invariance implies h(sr) = r·h(s), which is reminiscent of logarithms, and is some nice foreshadowing for the rest of the proof. Given arbitrarily small ǫ > 0, and integers s and t, pick n and r so that 2/n < ǫ, and sr ≤ tn < sr+1. So: r log(s) ≤ n log(t) < (r + 1) log(s) =⇒ r n ≤ log(t) log(s) < r + 1 n =⇒ r n − log(t) log(s) < 1 n . Axiom 2 then tells us: h(sr) ≤ h(tn) < h(sr+1) =⇒ r · h(s) ≤ n · h(t) < (r + 1)h(s) =⇒ r n ≤ h(t) h(s) < r + 1 n =⇒ r n − h(t) h(s) < 1 n . All of this tells us: h(t) h(s) − log(t) log(s) < ǫ, which can be shown to be true ∀ǫ > 0, and thus h(n) = λi log(n), where λi must be a positive constant to satisfy Axiom 2. Let pk = µ(Ak) for each Ak ∈ Pi. Suppose, for now, that each pk is a rational number. Then there exists integers n1, . . . , nm, such that for all k ∈ {1, . . . , m} we have: pk = nk m . Our interpretation is that we have a uniform distribution over Pj states, and the chance of the event which happens with probability pk is the chance nj equally likely nj Pj=1 of one of the nk associated states occurring. Then using the definition of learning strategy invariance: , . . . , ci 1 Pj nj 1 nj! = h m Xj=1 Pj nj! = λi log m Xj=1 nj! = ci(p1, . . . , pm)+ m Xj=1 pjλi log(nj), 42 pjλi log(nj) m Xj=1 pjλi log(nj) m m = =⇒ ci(p1, . . . , pm) = λi log m nj! − Xj=1 nj!! − Xk=1 Xk=1 pkλi log m Xj=1 nj! = −λi pkλi log nk Pj Xj=1 m Xk=1 = − m pk log(pk) = λiH(Pi, µ), where H is defined as in equation (1). If any of the pi are irrational, then the density of the rationals and Axiom 3 can be used to get the same result. Thus: C(Pi, µ) = ci(µ(A1), . . . , µ(Am)) = λiH(Pi, µ).(cid:4) Mutual Information Consider two partitions P1 and P2. Given some probability measure µ, define the mutual information between P1 and P2, denoted I(P1, P2, µ), to be: I(P1, P2, µ) = Xa1∈P1 Xa2∈P2 µ(a1 ∩ a2) log(cid:16) µ(a1 ∩ a2) µ(a1)µ(a2)(cid:17) Then, as is well known in the literature: H(×{Pi}2 i=1, µ) = H(P1, µ) + H(P2, µ) − I(P1, P2, µ) = E[H(P1, µ(·P2(ω)))] + I(P1, P2, µ) + E[H(P2, µ(·P1(ω)))] = H(P1, µ)−I(P1, P2, µ) = H(P2, µ)−I(P1, P2, µ) = H(P1, µ) + E[H(P2, µ(·P1(ω)))] = H(P2, µ) + E[H(P1, µ(·P2(ω)))] and note that the strict concavity of H means that I(P1, P2, µ) ≥ 0. Mutual information can be thought of as the information that is double counted 43 if one were to compute the total uncertainty about the outcome of P1 and P2 by simply adding up the uncertainty about the outcome of P1 and the uncertainty about the outcome of P2. When the mutual information increases and the individual uncertainty about the outcome of P1 and the outcome of P2 are held constant the total uncertainty about the outcome of P1 and P2 decreases because the amount that remains to be learned after observing one of the outcomes of either P1 or P2 decreases. Mutual information can be acquired by learning the value of either P1 or P2. When we think of an agent that is trying to acquire information in an efficient fashion, we should always envision them acquiring mutual information from the cheapest source, by learning about whichever of P1 and P2 has the lowest associated multiplier. This logic is formalized by the result in Lemma 6. Lemma 6. If C satisfies our five axioms, and Sb = {P b Sb = {P b i , . . . , P b 1, . . . , P b i+1, P b m} are two binary learning strategies such that P b i and 1, . . . , P b i , P b i+1, . . . , P b m} and P b i+1's associated multipliers are ordered λi ≥ λi+1, then for all probability measures µ: C(Sb, µ) ≥ C( Sb, µ). Proof. For all realizations of ∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω): C((P b i , P b i+1), µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω))) = λiH(P b i , µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω)))+λi+1E[H(P b i+1, µ(·∩i j=1P b j (ω)))] = λiH(P b i , µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b i+1, µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω)))−I(P b i , P b i+1, µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω)))+λi+1(cid:16)H(P b j (ω))(cid:17) ≥ λi(cid:16)H(P b = λi+1H(P b i , µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω)))−I(P b i , P b i+1, µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b i+1, µ(·∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω))) j (ω))(cid:17)+λi+1H(P b i+1, µ(· ∩i−1 j=1 P b j (ω))) + λiE[H(P b i , µ(·(∩i−1 j=1P b j (ω)) ∩ P b i+1(ω)))] = C((P b i+1, P b i ), µ(· ∩i−1 j=1 P b j (ω))). It is thus always weakly cheaper in expectation to have Pi+1 before Pi since switching their order does not change the expected cost of implementing the binary 44 partitions before or after the pair.(cid:4) Proof of Theorem 1. Given some probability measure µ, suppose Sb is a binary learning strategy such that σ(Sb) = F , and C(Sb, µ) = min Sb∈Sb(Ω) C(Sb, µ). We know such binary learning strategy exists whenever C satisfies Axiom 1. We may assume that if P b i+1 are in Sb with associated multipliers λi and λi+1, that λi ≤ λi+1. If not, then their order can be reversed and the resultant strategy is weakly i and P b less costly, as is shown in Lemma 6. If for any j ∈ {1, . . . , M}, multiplier λj's associated binary partitions P b i , . . . , P b i+k in Sb are such that σ(P b i , . . . , P b i+k) 6= σ(P b m+l with associated multiplier λj, such that σ(P b λj ), then there are binary partitions i+k, Pm+1, . . . , P b m+l can be appended to the end of Sb, and the resultant strategy i , . . . , P b m+l) = P b m+1, . . . , P b λj ). P b m+1, . . . , P b σ(P b Sb is also such that: C( Sb, µ) = min Sb∈Sb(Ω) C(S, µ). This is true since each appended binary partition has an expected cost of zero, since σ(Sb) = F . Lemma 6 then implies that if we reorder Sb so that the new learning strategy S's binary partitions are ordered by their multipliers, then: C( Sb, µ) = min Sb∈Sb(Ω) C(S, µ). We can thus assume that Sb is such that for any j ∈ {1, . . . , M} multiplier λj's asso- ciated binary partitions P b i , . . . , P b i+k in Sb are such that σ(P b i , . . . , P b For each j ∈ {1, . . . , M} we thus have that if all binary partitions P b i+k) = σ(Pλj ). i , . . . , P b i+k in Sb with multiplier λj are taken together that: E[C((P b i , . . . , P b i+k), µ(· ∩i−1 t=1 P b t (ω)))] = Eh i+k Xl=i λjH(P b l , µ(· ∩l−1 t=1 P b t (ω)))i 45 = E[λjH(Pλj , µ(· ∩i−1 t=1 P b t (ω)))] = E[λjH(Pλj , µ(· ∩j−1 t=1 Pλt(ω)))]. Where the second equality holds due to the properties of H. This procedure can be carried out for all µ. Thus: C(Sb, µ) = min Sb∈Sb(Ω) C(S, µ). = λ1H(cid:16)Pλ1, µ(cid:17)+E(cid:20)λ2H(cid:16)Pλ2, µ(·Pλ1(ω))(cid:17)+· · ·+λMH(cid:16)PλM , µ(·∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))(cid:17)(cid:21).(cid:4) Appendix 2 Proof of Lemma 3. In Lemma 3, we show that we can rewrite the agent's problem in terms of selecting the choice probabilities described in equations (4), (5), and (6). To do this, we first establish several other lemmas. In Lemma 7, we show that: min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) is a strictly concave function of µ. This is a commonly known property of Shannon Entropy, but needs to be established for in our context. This implies that C is strictly convex. We then show, in Lemma 8, that, given the convexity of C, any selected action is associated with a particular posterior probability. This is desirable because it allows us to reduce the strategies considered to recommendation strategies. That is, we are able to focus on signals that are simply a recommendation of an option. In Lemma 9, we show that we may rewrite the cost function in terms of the choice probabilities in equations (4), (5), and (6). Lemma 7. min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) is a strictly concave function of µ. Namely, if there are probability measures µa, and µb, such that µ = αµa + (1 − α)µb for some α ∈ (0, 1), and µa 6= µb, then: min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) > α(cid:16) min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µa)(cid:17) + (1 − α)(cid:16) min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µb)(cid:17). Proof. For each probability measure µ, i ∈ {1, . . . , M}, and realization of ∩i−1 j=1Pλj (ω), 46 the strict concavity of Shannon Entropy (Matejka & McKay, 2015; Caplin et al., 2017) implies: H(Pλi, µ(·∩i−1 j=1Pλj (ω))) ≥ αH(Pλi, µa(·∩i−1 j=1Pλj (ω)))+(1−α)H(Pλi, µb(·∩i−1 j=1Pλj (ω))). The inequality is also strict for at least one i ∈ {1, . . . , M} since µa 6= µb. The desired result thus follows from Theorem 1.(cid:4) Lemma 8. If action n ∈ N is selected with positive probability, Pr(n) > 0, as the outcome of information strategy F with is a solution to (2) subject to (3), then there exists a posterior belief Bn such that F (ωs) = Bn with probability one whenever n is selected. Proof. It is impossible that there are two distinct sets of signals S1 n and S2 n which are observed with strictly positive probability, both of which lead to the selection of n, and induce different posteriors F (ωs1) 6= F (ωs2) for s1 ∈ S1 n and s2 ∈ S2 n. C(S, µ) is strictly concave in µ, as shown in Lemma 7, so the agent could thus min S∈S(Ω) do better by replacing their original information strategy F with a new information strategy F which is identical to F except the signals in S1 n are replaced by n and S2 s0: ∀ω ∈ Ω let F (s0ω) = Rs∈S1 n F (sω) + Rs∈S2 n linear, and the law of iterated expectations implies the agent still picks n after s0 is F (sω). This is true because payoffs are realized since ∀ ν ∈ N : F (sω)µ(ω) n Pω∈Ω Rs∈S1 F (sω)µ(ω) + Rs∈S2 n EF [vn(ω)s ∈ S1 n] F (sω)µ(ω)(cid:19) E F [vn(ω)s0] = n Pω∈Ω(cid:18) Rs∈S1 Pω∈Ω Rs∈S2 F (sω)µ(ω) + Rs∈S2 n n n F (sω)µ(ω) + Pω∈Ω(cid:18) Rs∈S2 EF [vn(ω)s ∈ S2 n] F (sω)µ(ω)(cid:19) 47 F (sω)µ(ω) n Pω∈Ω Rs∈S1 F (sω)µ(ω) + Rs∈S2 n F (sω)µ(ω) ≥ n Pω∈Ω(cid:18) Rs∈S1 Pω∈Ω Rs∈S2 F (sω)µ(ω) + Rs∈S2 n n + . Pω∈Ω(cid:18) Rs∈S2 n EF [vν(ω)s ∈ S1 n] F (sω)µ(ω)(cid:19) EF [vν(ω)s ∈ S2] = E F [vν(ω)s0].(cid:4) F (sω)µ(ω)(cid:19) Lemma 9. The cost of information for a given strategy in equation (2) can be written: C(F (s, ω), µ) = C(P, µ) =Xω∈Ω µ(ω)Xn∈N(cid:16) − λ1Pr(n) log(Pr(n)) − (λ2 − λ1)Pr(nPλ1(ω)) log(Pr(nPλ1(ω))) −(λ3 − λ2)Pr(nPλ1(ω) ∩ Pλ2(ω)) log(Pr(nPλ1(ω) ∩ Pλ2(ω))) − . . . −(λM −λM −1)Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) log(Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)))+λM Pr(nω) log(Pr(nω))(cid:17). Proof. Let Ps = (S1, . . . , Sn) denote a partition of the space of signals the agent may receive. We showed in Lemma 8 that for each Si if s in Si then with probability one s results in a particular posterior. We then have: C(F (s, ω), µ) = E[ min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) − min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ(·s))] = E(cid:20)λ1(cid:16)H(Pλ1, µ) − H(Pλ1, µ(·s))(cid:17) + . . . + λM(cid:16)H(PλM , µ(· ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))) − H(PλM , µ(· ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω), s))(cid:17)(cid:21) = E(cid:20)λ1(cid:16)H(Ps, F (s)) − H(Ps, F (sPλ1(ω)))(cid:17) 48 (11) (12) + . . . + λM(cid:16)H(Ps, F (s ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))) − H(Ps, F (s ∩M i=1 Pλi(ω)))(cid:17)(cid:21) = Ehλ1H(Ps, F (s)) + (λ2 − λ1)H(Ps, F (sPλ1(ω))) + . . . + (λM − λM −1)H(Ps, F (s ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))) − λM H(Ps, F (s ∩M i=1 Pλi(ω)))i =Xω∈Ω µ(ω)Xn∈N(cid:16) − λ1Pr(n) log(Pr(n)) − (λ2 − λ1)Pr(nPλ1(ω)) log(Pr(nPλ1(ω))) −(λ3 − λ2)Pr(nPλ1(ω) ∩ Pλ2(ω)) log(Pr(nPλ1(ω) ∩ Pλ2(ω))) − . . . −(λM −λM −1)Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) log(Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)))+λM Pr(nω) log(Pr(nω))(cid:17). The equality of (11) and (12) follows from the symmetry of mutual information, defined in Appendix 1. (cid:4) We now resume our proof of Lemma 3. First notice that Lemma 9 establishes C(P, µ). For each n ∈ N , let sn denote a signal in Sn which results in the posterior generated by signals in Sn with probability one (in Lemma 8 we showed we can do this). Then notice: Xω∈ΩZs V (s)F (dsω)µ(ω) = Xn∈N V (sn) Zs∈Sn Xω∈Ω F (dsω)µ(ω) vn(ω)F (ωsn)Pr(n) = Xn∈N V (sn)Pr(n) = Xn∈NXω∈Ω = Xn∈NXω∈Ω vn(ω)Pr(nω)µ(ω) Where the last step follows from the fact that Pr(XY )Pr(Y ) = Pr(Y X)Pr(X). We now proceed with two proofs by contradiction. First, assume that (F, a) is a 49 solution to (2) subject to (3), which achieves expected utility U1, and let P be the choice probabilities induced by it. Assume that P is not a solution to (7) subject to (8) and (9), and thus there is a P which satisfies (8) and (9) and achieves expected utility U2 > U1. However, a strategy pairing ( F , a) can be created that generates P. For instance, for each of N distinct signals sn, let a( F (ωsn)) ≡ n, and let F (sn, ω) = Pr(nω)µ(ω) ∀ ω so that (3) is satisfied. This is impossible though as then ( F , a) achieves U2 > U1 and (F, a) cannot have been optimal. Similarly, assume that P is a solution to (7) subject to (8) and (9), which achieves expected utility U3 and but is not induced by a solution to 2 subject to (3). That is there is a F which satisfies (3) and achieves U4 > U3. This means, however, that Pr(nω) = also achieves U4, which is impossible as P was supposedly F (sn, ω) optimal and P satisfies (8) and (9). (cid:4) µ(ω) Proof of Theorem 2. The Lagrangian for the above problem can be written: L = Xn∈NXω∈Ω vn(ω)Pr(nω)µ(ω) − C(P, µ) +Xn∈NXω∈Ω Pr(nω) − 1(cid:17)µ(ω) γ(ω)(cid:16)Xn∈N −Xω∈Ω ξn(ω)Pr(nω)µ(ω) Where ξn(ω) ≥ 0 are the Lagrange multipliers for (8), and γ(ω) are the multipliers for (9). If Pr(n) = 0, then Pr(nω) = 0 ∀ω ∈ Ω. If Pr(n ∩m i=1 Pλi(ω)) = 0 for some m ∈ {1, . . . , M − 1} and ω, then Pr(nω) = 0. If Pr(n) > 0, and Pr(n ∩m i=1 Pλi(ω)) > 0, ∀m ∈ {1, . . . , M − 1}, then the first order condition with respect to Pr(nω) implies: vn(ω) + λ1(1 + log Pr(n)) + (λ2 − λ1)(1 + log Pr(nPλ1(ω))) + . . . +(λM −λM −1)(1+log Pr(n∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)))−λM (1+log Pr(nω)) = γ(ω)−ξn(ω) which then implies Pr(nω) > 0 and ξn(ω) = 0, because if not, and Pr(nω) = 0, then since ξn(ω) ≥ 0, equality of the first order condition then necessitates γ(ω) = ∞. 50 This is impossible, however, since then ∀ ν ∈ N their respective first order conditions holding necessitates Pr(νω) = 0. This being true ∀ ν ∈ N of course then violates (9). Thus, the first order condition implies: Pr(nω) = Pr(n) λ1 λM Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(n ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) λM −λM −1 λM e vn(ω) λM e −γ(ω) λM Plugging (13) into (9), one can solve for γ(ω). Plugging γ(ω) back into (13) achieves the desired result.(cid:4) (13) Proof of Corollary 1. Plug equation (10) into equation (7). (cid:4) Proof of Theorem 3. A fixed effect interpretation of MSSE follows easily from the optimal choice probabilities described in Theorem 2: Pr(nω) = Pr(n) λ1 λM Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ1 λM Pr(νPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(n ∩M −1 λ2−λ1 λM . . . Pr(ν ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω)) i=1 Pλi(ω)) λM λM −λM −1 λM e λM −λN −1 vn(ω) λM vν (ω) λM e Pr(ν) Xν∈N (NPr(n)) λ1 λM (NPr(nPλ1(ω))) λ1 λM (NPr(νPλ1(ω))) λ2−λ1 λM . . . (NPr(n ∩M −1 λ2−λ1 λM . . . (NPr(ν ∩M −1 i=1 Pλi(ω))) i=1 Pλi(ω))) λM λM −λM −1 λM e λM −λN −1 vn(ω) λM vν (ω) λM e = (NPr(ν)) Xν∈N vn(ω)+λ1α0 n+(λ2−λ1)α1 n+···+(λM −λM −1)α λM M −1 n vν (ω)+λ1α0 ν +(λ2−λ1)α1 M −1 ν +···+(λM −λM −1)α ν λM e = e Xν∈N ν = log(NPr(ν)), and for m ∈ {1, . . . , M −1} we have αm Where α0 Pλi(ω))). Normalizing the value of the options by λM , namely letting vn = vn(ω) λM ν = log(NPr(ν∩m i=1 , and defining αn appropriately, agent choice behavior described by rational inattention with MSSE can then be interpreted as a RU model where each option n has perceived 51 value: un = vn + λ1 λM α0 n + λ2−λ1 λM α1 n + · · · + λM −λM −1 λM αM −1 n + ǫn = vn + αn + ǫn The only kind of RU model consistent with this behavior is one where ǫn is distributed iid according to a Gumbel distribution (Train, 2009). (cid:4) Appendix 3 The behavior described in Theorem 2 has many intuitive features. It is also a quite natural extension of the analogous result from Matejka and McKay (2015), which is described in equation (14). If we assume the agent has prior µ, and all parti- tions are learning strategy invariant (the environment studied in Matejka and McKay (2015)) and have associated multiplier λ2, then if the agent does optimal research in state ω ∈ Ω, they select option n from their set of options N with probability: Pr(nω) = Pr(n)e vn(ω) λ2 Pr(ν)e vν (ω) λ2 Pν∈N . (14) One major takeaway from the formula in (14) is that when Shannon Entropy is used to measure uncertainty the chance of the agent selecting an option n in a particular state of the world ω is fully determined by the unconditional chances of the options being selected, Pr(n), and the realized values of the options in that state of the world. Beyond this takeaway, the formula in (14) also has many intuitive features. If λ2 grows, which represents an increase in the difficulty of learning, the value of each option in the realized state becomes less significant for the determination of the selected option, and the significance of the agent's prior increases. Similarly, if λ2 shrinks, the agent's prior becomes less significant, and the realized values of the options becomes more significant. If λ2 approaches infinity, the realized values 52 become insignificant, and the behavior of the agent approaches the behavior of the agent in the case where learning is impossible: they choose their option based on their prior. If λ2 approaches zero the unconditional priors become insignificant, and the behavior of the agent approaches the behavior of the agent in the case where learning is costless: they choose the option with the highest realized value. If we instead assume that the agent may also learn through a partition with a lower multiplier λ1, that can convey information about the realization Pλ1(ω) of a partition Pλ1 of Ω, then if Pλ1 6= Ω, and the agent does optimal research in state ω ∈ Ω, they select option n from their set of options N with probability: Pr(nω) = Pr(n) λ1 λ2 Pr(nPλ1(ω)) vn(ω) λ2 Pr(ν) Pν∈N λ1 λ2 Pr(νPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λ2 e λ2−λ1 λ2 e vν (ω) λ2 . (15) With MSSE, as the formula in (15) indicates, the chance of the agent selecting an option n in a particular state of the world ω depends not only on the unconditional chances of the options being selected and the realized values of the options, but also on the values that the options take in similar states of the world, states that result in the same realization of Pλ1. When option n is in general desirable in Pλ1(ω) relative to the other options, then Pr(nPλ1(ω)) is larger, and there may be a high chance of n being selected, even if Pr(n) is not that large, and vn(ω) is not that high. The formula in (15) also has many intuitive features. It maintains the intu- itive comparative statistics for λ2 that the formula in (14) had, and also features intuitive properties for Pr(nPλ1(ω)) and λ1. If observing Pλ1(ω) is completely un- informative about the value of the options, then it is optimal for the agent to se- lect Pr(nPλ1(ω)) = Pr(n) since min S∈S(Ω) C(S, µ) is strictly concave in µ. In this case Pr(n) λ1 λ2 Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λ2 = Pr(n), and behavior is identical to that in (14). If the cheaper information source contains irrelevant information it is thus ignored, and be- havior collapses back to the environment described in Matejka and McKay (2015), 53 as we should desire. If λ1 approaches λ2 (the cheaper information source becomes close to as expensive as the more expensive information source) then behavior ap- proaches that described in (14) since Pr(n) λ1 λ2 Pr(nPλ1(ω)) λ2−λ1 λ2 → Pr(n). Thus, if an insignificantly cheaper information source is introduced behavior is changed in an insignificant fashion. Again, this seems like a desirable property. If λ1 approaches zero then the role of the unconditional priors dissipates, and exponent on Pr(nP(ω)) approaches one, meaning it replaces the unconditional prior from (14). This makes sense because if λ1 goes to zero it means Pλ1(ω) can essentially be viewed for free, in which case behavior within each Pλ1(ω) should resemble that in the setting where there is only one information source with multiplier λ2 and a prior of µ(·Pλ1(ω)). We can continue adding as many new partitions with new associated multipliers as we desire and the description of behavior in Theorem 2 maintains the sorts of intuitive properties described in the paragraphs above. RI with MSSE is thus a very natural extension of RI with Shannon Entropy. 54 References Acharya, S., & Wee, S. L. (2019). Rational inattention in hiring decisions. FRB of New York Staff Report(878). Ambuehl, S., Ockenfels, A., & Stewart, C. (2019). Attention and selection effects. Rotman School of Management Working Paper (3154197). Caplin, A., Dean, M., & Leahy, J. (2017). Rationally inattentive behavior: Char- acterizing and generalizing shannon entropy (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research. Caplin, A., Dean, M., & Leahy, J. (2018). Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice. The Review of Economic Studies, 86 (3), 1061 -- 1094. Dasgupta, K., & Mondria, J. (2018). Inattentive importers. Journal of International Economics, 112 , 150 -- 165. Dean, M., & Neligh, N. L. (2019). Experimental tests of rational inattention. de Oliveira, H. (2014). Axiomatic foundations for entropic costs of attention (Tech. Rep.). Mimeo. de Oliveira, H., Denti, T., Mihm, M., & Ozbek, K. (2017). Rationally inattentive preferences and hidden information costs. Theoretical Economics, 12 (2), 621 -- 654. Ellis, A. (2018). Foundations for optimal inattention. Journal of Economic Theory, 173 , 56 -- 94. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3 -- 34). Oxford University Press. H´ebert, B., & Woodford, M. (2017). Rational inattention and sequential information sampling (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research. Huettner, F., Boyacı, T., & Ak¸cay, Y. (2019). Consumer choice under limited atten- tion when alternatives have different information costs. Operations Research. Matejka, F., & McKay, A. (2015). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A 55 new foundation for the multinomial logit model. American Economic Review , 105 (1), 272 -- 98. Morris, S., & Strack, P. (2019). The wald problem and the relation of sequential sampling and ex-ante information costs. Morris, S., & Yang, M. (2016). Coordination and continuous choice. Working paper . Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2014). In the attraction, compromise, and similar- ity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions. Cognition, 132 (1), 44 -- 56. Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2018). Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data. Psychological review , 125 (4), 512. Pomatto, L., Strack, P., & Tamuz, O. (2019). The cost of information. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal , 27 (3), 379 -- 423. Sims, C. A. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of monetary Eco- nomics, 50 (3), 665 -- 690. Steiner, J., Stewart, C., & Matejka, F. (2017). Rational inattention dynamics: Inertia and delay in decision-making. Econometrica, 85 (2), 521 -- 553. Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive psychology, 53 (1), 1 -- 26. Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press. Walker-Jones, D. (2019, December). Rational inattention and non-compensatory choice. Retrieved from https://www.dwalkerjones.com Woodford, M. (2014). Stochastic choice: An optimizing neuroeconomic model. Amer- ican Economic Review , 104 (5), 495 -- 500. 56
1907.10080	1	1907	2019-07-23T18:02:28	Optimal auctions for networked markets with externalities	[ "econ.TH", "cs.GT", "math.OC" ]	Motivated by the problem of market power in electricity markets, we introduced in previous works a mechanism for simplified markets of two agents with linear cost. In standard procurement auctions, the market power resulting from the quadratic transmission losses allows the producers to bid above their true values, which are their production cost. The mechanism proposed in the previous paper optimally reduces the producers' margin to the society's benefit. In this paper, we extend those results to a more general market made of a finite number of agents with piecewise linear cost functions, which makes the problem more difficult, but simultaneously more realistic. We show that the methodology works for a large class of externalities. We also provide an algorithm to solve the principal allocation problem. Our contribution provides a benchmark to assess the sub-optimality of the mechanisms used in practice.	econ.TH	econ	Optimal auctions for networked markets with externalities Benjamin Heymann1 , Alejandro Jofr´e2 Abstract Motivated by the problem of market power in electricity markets, we introduced in previ- ous works a mechanism for simplified markets of two agents with linear cost. In standard procurement auctions, the market power resulting from the quadratic transmission losses allows the producers to bid above their true values, which are their production cost. The mechanism proposed in the previous paper optimally reduces the producers' margin to the society's benefit. In this paper, we extend those results to a more general market made of a finite number of agents with piecewise linear cost functions, which makes the problem more difficult, but simultaneously more realistic. We show that the method- ology works for a large class of externalities. We also provide an algorithm to solve the principal allocation problem. Our contribution provides a benchmark to assess the sub-optimality of the mechanisms used in practice. Keywords: Optimal auctions, mechanism design, allocation algorithm, electricity markets, fixed point. JEL classification: D44, D62, D82 1. Introduction Our purpose in this paper is to show how oligopolistic behaviors in network markets can be tackled using mechanism design. We point out that the optimal mechanism we obtain has a surprisingly simple expression. We complete this work with algorithmic tools for the computation of this mechanism. Following a model already discussed in [1, 2, 3], we consider a geographically extended market where a divisible good is traded. In this proposal, each market participant is located on a node of a graph, and the nodes are connected by edges. The good can travel from one node to another through those edges at the cost of a loss. Since our initial motivation was the electricity market, we will do the presentation with quadratic loss, but as explained thereafter, our results extend to a broad class of externalities. We are considering the usual transmission network constraints with the DC approximation (active power) for the losses. We will use the word principal to designate what could also be called in the centralized market literature a central operator, or in the context of electricity markets, an ISO. The principal, who aggregates the (inelastic) demand side, has to locally match -i.e. at each node - production and demand at the lowest expense through a procurement auction. As 1CMAP, Inria, Ecole polytechnique, CNRS, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, 91128, Palaiseau, France. CMM, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 2CMM and DIM, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Preprint submitted to Journal of Economic Theory July 25, 2019 argued in [3], this setting can be applied to describe real electricity markets, but it could also be used in other markets where a good is being transported. Either way, there is a clear antagonism between the market participants: the operator wants to minimize his expected cost while the producers want to maximize their expected profits. Therefore, at the same time that there is a transaction and a commitment between each agent and the principal, there also exists competition among the agents. In a standard procurement auction, the market power resulting from the quadratic line losses allows the producers to bid above their true values, or production cost [1]. The mechanism reduces the producers' margin and decreases the social cost represented in this case by the optimal value of the principal. This optimal auction design was introduced by Myerson in 1981 [4] for a non-divisible good and no externalities. We build on an electricity market model introduced by the second author in two previ- ous papers [2] and [1]. The authors wrote a brief presentation of this model in [5]. Other models were proposed for example in [6], [7], and [8], with a focus on the existence of a market equilibrium. We pinpoint that if our initial motivation was electricity markets, network markets are used in other setting such as telecommunication [9]. Distributed markets were also studied in [10, 11], with a focus on efficiency and linear cost for trans- missions. For more information on the techniques we use in this paper the reader can refer to [12], [13], [14], [15], the chapter 45 of [16] and [17] for general introductions on principal-agent theory, mechanism design, game theory and lattices theory respectively. In the sequel we consider, as we did in [3], that every participant knows the demand at each node before the interactions begin and that the production cost of each agent is private information. In a standard setting, the agents are the first to bid their costs, after which the principal, knowing the bids, minimizes his cost. In a standard setting, the principal is, therefore, a bid-taker. The producers know they influence the allocation and compete with each other to maximize their individual profit. Since the demand is known by everyone, everyone can guess the principal reaction once the bids have been announced: we can therefore virtually remove the principal from the interaction in the standard setting and consider that the agents are players of a game with incomplete information (since the agents do not know their fellow agents' preferences). This equivalence is true provided that the agents are not communicating with each other. The mechanism changes the payoff function of this game -subject to constraints we detail in this article- so as to minimize the principal's expected cost before the bids are announced. Allowing the principal to act first by revealing a committing rule gives him a strategic advantage in the negotiation. We restrict our discussion to deterministic demand, but the reasoning extends natu- rally to random demand as long as any possible realization of the demand satisfies the model assumptions. Indeed, since the optimal mechanism constructed in this article is incentive compatible, then a random version (where the demand is revealed after the producers' bidding phase, as in [2]) would be realization-wise incentive compatible, and so incentive compatible. Observe that the mechanism we propose in the sequel could be adapted to elastic, piecewise linear demand. Our first main result is actually the mechanism design characterization. The result is valid for a very general class of externalities as explained in the generalization section. This characterization of the optimal mechanism could be used to assess the sub-optimality of the mechanisms used in practice. Interestingly, the allocation procedures for the optimal and the standard mechanism 2 are the same (one just needs to modify the input of the allocation procedure of the standard mechanism to get the allocation of the optimal mechanism). Our second main result is a principal allocation algorithm based on a fixed point. The fixed point could be interpreted as cooperating agents trying to minimize a global criterion by sharing relevant information. Our implementation of the algorithm gives good results against standard methods. We point out that the numerical computation of the Nash equilibrium for the procurement auction (important to compare the optimal mechanism and the standard auction setting) requires an efficient algorithm to compute the allocation. Some other additional facts are presented within the paper: the smoothness of the allocation functions (q and Q), a decreasing rate estimation for the fixed point iterations, some results of numerical experiments with the fixed point algorithm. We describe the market in the next section. In §3 we introduce and solve the mech- anism design problem. In §5, we study the standard allocation problem and propose an algorithm to solve it. In §6 we sum up and comment on our main results and propose possible continuations of this work. 2. Market description The production cost of each agent is assumed to be piecewise linear, non-decreasing and convex in the quantity produced. This class of functions is sufficiently rich to rep- resent real-life problems and is sufficiently simple for theoretical study. In this work we need to assume that the production levels at which there is a slope change are known in advance and are exogenous - that is the agents cannot choose them-. Then, without loss of generality, we assume that there is a quantity ¯q such that the changes of slope only occur at the multiples of ¯q. Thus, the authors find it practical to write the production cost functions in the form N(cid:88) C c(q) = cj min((q − (j − 1)¯q)+, ¯q), (1) j=1 where N ∈ N and the cj are some slopes coefficients specific to the agent, while q is the quantity produced. We will sometimes refer to the vector of the cj as the cost vector (of the agent). If we denote by qj i the quantity produced by agent i at marginal cost cj i , i = min((qi − (j − 1)¯q)+, ¯q), where qi is the total quantity produced by this agent. then qj Let c∗ < c∗ ∈ R∗+ and C a set of non-decreasing N -tuples of [c∗, c∗]. To each element c of C we associate the piecewise linear cost function q → C c(q). Throughout the paper we set, for any c ∈ C, cN +1 = c∗ to simplify the notations in some proofs. Note that in practice a capacity constraint of the type q ≤ j ¯q for a given agent can be implemented by setting its (j + 1)th slope cj+1 equal to a big positive number. If an agent of cost vector c produces a quantity q and receives a transfer x, then its profit is ui = x − C c(q). (2) There are n agents numbered from 1 to n in the market. We denote I = [1 . . . n] and use generically the letter i to refer to a specific agent, and −i to refer to I\{i}. We denote J = [1 . . . N ] and we will use generically j for the cost coefficients of the jth segment (starting from 1). The agents are dispatched on the n nodes of a graph. At each node 3 i we find the corresponding agent i and a local demand di. The nodes are connected by undirected edges. We write V (i) the set of nodes different from i connected to i. Obviously if i1 ∈ V (i2) then i2 ∈ V (i1). We denote E = {(i1, i2) : i1 ∈ V (i2)} the set of undirected edges. For each (i1, i2) ∈ E, we introduce a quadratic loss coefficient ri1,i2 such that ri1,i2 = ri2,i1 . In the context of electricity markets, this quadratic coefficient corresponds to the Joule effect within the lines. We make the non restricting assumption that N is big enough so that in what follows production at each node is smaller than ¯qN . We assume that both the agents and the principal are risk neutral: they maximize their expected profit. If the principal proposes to pay a price xi to agent i to make her produce a quantity qi - this agent being free to accept or decline the offer- and if the agent i has a production cost defined by ci, then he accepts the offer if xi − C ci (qi) ≥ 0. (3) Then for agent i, either xi ≥ C ci(qi) or qi = 0. Thus, if the principal knew the cost vectors ci, he would solve an allocation problem with those ci, and then bid to the agents the quantity and the payments corresponding to the solution of the allocation problem. But the principal does not know the cost vectors, and instead what happens is that the agents tell him some values for the ci (not necessarily their real cost vectors), and then the principal decides based on those values. In this case, previous works [1] showed that the agents could receive non-zero profits and bid above their production costs. The question we now address is how to reduce their margins. To do so, we need to consider an intermediate scenario between the one in which the agent knows nothing (and is a price taker), and the one in which he knows everything (and therefore directly optimizes the whole system as a global optimizer). Each agent is characterized by an element fi, which is a probability density of support included in C and an element ci of C drawn according to fi. Only agent i knows ci, which is private information. The other agents and the principal only know the probability fi with which it was drawn. The density fi corresponds to the public knowledge on agent i's production costs so the principal won't accept any bid ci that is not in the support of fi. We assume that the cost slopes are not correlated for a given agent and between agents, i.e. their laws f j i ). In such situation, it makes sense to define i are independent. In particular fi(ci) =(cid:81) j∈J f j i (cj f−i(c−i) = fi(cid:48)(ci(cid:48)) and f (c1, .., cn) = fi(cid:48)(ci), (4) (cid:89) i(cid:48)∈I\i (cid:89) i∈I and E (respectively Ec−i) the mean operator with respect to f (respectively f−i). The density f (resp. f−i) represents the uncertainty from the principal's (resp. agent i) perspective. To simplify notations we will use the symbol Cn to denote the product of the supports of the fis. We denote by Q the set of allocation functions - which +, by X the set of payments functions -which are are the applications from Cn to Rn the applications from Cn to Rn, and by H the set of flow functions - which are the applications from Cn to RE -. A direct mechanism is a triple (q, x, h) ∈ (Q,X , H). Let (q, x) ∈ (Q,X ). For this payment function and this allocation function, the expected 4 profit of agent i of type ci and bid c(cid:48) i is Ui(ci, c(cid:48) i) = E−iui = Xi(c(cid:48) cj i Qj i (c(cid:48) i). i) −(cid:88) j∈J where the capitalized quantities i (ci) = E−i min((qi(ci, c−i) − (j − 1)¯q)+, ¯q) and Xi(ci) = E−ixi(ci, c−i) Qj correspond to the average of their non capitalized counterpart. We also denote by (5) (6) (7) Vi(ci) = Ui(ci, ci). i (ci) =(cid:82) cj i (ci) = (cid:82) cj i , K j cj− i i i −j fi(c i the expected profit of agent i if he is of type ci and bids her true production cost. , s)ds/fi(ci). We point out that f j i (s)ds/f j For i ∈ I, j ∈ J and ci ∈ Ci let K j by independence of the laws of the cj i ). Thus K j i is simply the ratio of the cumulative distribution and the probability density for cj i . Our main assumption is the discernability assumption: for all i ∈ I and ci ∈ Ci, the virtual cost Ji,j(cj i ) is increasing in j. As demonstrated in the next section, the virtual cost could be interpreted as the real marginal cost augmented by a marginal information rent. The assumption imposes the marginal information rent to be such that for any bid, the virtual marginal prices are increasing, i.e. the virtual production cost function is convex. The assumption is necessary to show the independence property of the reformulation in Lemmas 6 and 7. i ) = K j i ) = cj i +K j i (cj i (cj i (cj cj− i This assumption implies the non overlapping working zones assumption: if we denote by Ci the support of fi, then Ci should be of the form: ] × . . . × [cN− Ci = [c1− , c1+ i i , cN + i i ] (8) i i < c1+ i < cN + i < . . . < cN− with c1− . We could interpret each segment over which the agent has a constant marginal cost as a working zone with identified productive assets. The expertise of the market participants should allow them to, based on the working zone, assess the marginal cost of the agent. This makes senses for instance if the setting is repeated over time. This estimation need to be precise enough so that there is no chance that it corresponds to another working zone. We use this assumption in particular in the proof of lemma 4. For simplicity we assume that cj i . 3. This assumption can be withdrawn using the ironing technique introduced by Myerson without difficulty. To finish with the market presentation, we introduce the products of i ) is increasing in cj i → cj i + K i j(cj the type sets Cn =(cid:81) i∈I Ci(cid:48) and C−i =(cid:81) i(cid:48)∈I\{i} Ci(cid:48) . 3. Mechanism Design We begin with the revelation principle as expressed in [18]. 3This is the piecewise linear adaptation of the classic monotone likelihood ratio property assumption 5 Theorem 1 (Revelation Principle). To any Bayesian Nash equilibrium of a game of incomplete information, there exists a payoff-equivalent direct revelation mechanism that has an equilibrium where the players truthfully report their types. According to the revelation principle, we can look for direct truthful mechanisms. Because, there is no reason why the agents should willingly report their types we need to add a constraint on the design to enforce truthfulness. This means that the profit of any agent i of type ci should be maximal when agent i bids her true type ci i.e. for all (c(cid:48) i, ci) Ui(ci, ci) ≥ Ui(ci, c(cid:48) i). (IC) (9) This is the incentive compatibility (IC) constraint. In addition, since we want all agents to participate in the market, we need the participation constraint imposing that for all ci Ui(ci, ci) ≥ 0. (P C) (10) Without this constraint, the principal would optimize as if the agents would accept any deal (even deals where they would make a negative profit). The last constraint is that the supply should be at least equal to the demand at every node. The supply available at a given node is equal to the production augmented by the imports minus the exports and the line losses. As explained earlier, there is a loss when some quantity hi,i(cid:48) of the divisible good is sent from one node i to another i(cid:48). This loss is equal to ri,i(cid:48)h2 i,i(cid:48), where ri,i(cid:48) is a multiplicative constant. In order to obtain symmetric expressions, we will proceed as if half of this quantity was lost by the sender, and the other half by the receiver (see for instance [1]). Note that we could have equivalently used signed flows, but we would have lost some symmetry in the formulation. Then the supply and demand constraint writes, for all i ∈ I and c ∈ Cn, qi(c) + hi(cid:48),i(c) − hi,i(cid:48)(c) − h2 i,i(cid:48)(c) + h2 i(cid:48),i(c) 2 ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di. (SD) (11) We point out that for an optimal allocation (see §5) , hi,i(cid:48)hi(cid:48),i = 0. The principal decision is a triple (q, x, h) ∈ (Q,X , H). This decision is made under the constraints (IC), (PC) and (SD). Since we assume that the principal is risk neutral, his goal is to minimize his average cost, which translates mathematically by his criterion being equal to the expected sum of payments. Finally the optimal mechanism is the solution of (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) Problem 1. minimize (q,x,h)∈(Q,X ,H) (cid:88) i∈I Exi(c) subject to ∀c ∈ Cn,∀i ∈ I : qi(c) + (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) ∀c ∈ Cn,∀(i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E : ∀i ∈ I,∀(c(cid:48) i, ci) ∈ C2 ∀i ∈ I,∀ci ∈ Ci : Ui(ci, ci) ≥ 0 hi,i(cid:48)(c) ≥ 0 i : Ui(ci, ci) ≥ Ui(ci, c(cid:48) i) (IC) (P C). 6 hi(cid:48),i(c) − hi,i(cid:48)(c) − h2 i,i(cid:48)(c) + h2 i(cid:48),i(c) 2 ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di (SD) We now proceed to solve the optimal mechanism design problem, which is a functional optimization problem with an infinity of constraints, some of which are expressed with integrals. The essential observation is that this complicated problem is equivalent to a much simpler one. The proof relies on the comparison with two intermediate problems: Problem 2. minimize (q,x,h)∈(Q,X ,H) (cid:88) i∈I Exi(c) subject to. ∀c ∈ Cn,∀i ∈ I : qi(c) + (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) hi(cid:48),i(c) − hi,i(cid:48)(c) − h2 i,i(cid:48)(c) + h2 i(cid:48),i(c) 2 ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di(SD) (cid:90) t2 hi,i(cid:48)(c) ≥ 0 ∀c ∈ Cn,∀(i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E : ∀i ∈ I,∀j ∈ J, (c−j, t1, t2), (c1, . . . , tk, . . . , cN ) ∈ Ci, : Vi(c1, .., cj−1, t1, cj+1.., cN ) − Vi(c1, .., cj−1, t2, cj+1.., cN ) = ∀i ∈ I,∀(c, c(cid:48)) ∈ c2 : ∀i ∈ I,∀ci ∈ Ci : and i (c1, .., cj−1, s, cj+1.., cN )ds Qj (c − c(cid:48)).(Qi(c) − Qi(c(cid:48))) ≤ 0, Vi(ci) ≥ 0 (P C), (H1) (H2) t1 Problem 3. minimize (q,h)∈(Q,H) E(cid:88) (cid:88) i∈I j∈J qj i (c)(cj i + K j i (cj i )) subject to ∀(c, i) ∈ Cn × I : qi(c) + ∀c ∈ Cn,∀(i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E : ∀c ∈ Ci,∀i ∈ I : xi(c) = (cid:88) (cid:88) j∈J i(cid:48)∈V (i) hi,i(cid:48)(c) ≥ 0. (cid:90) cj+ i cj i hi(cid:48),i(c) − hi,i(cid:48)(c) − h2 i,i(cid:48)(c) + h2 i(cid:48),i(c) ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di(SD) 2 qj i (c)cj i + qj i (c1 i . . . cj−1 i , t, c(j+1)+ 1 . . . cN + i ; c−i)dt. The inequality on the scalar product in (H2) is the piecewise linear equivalent of a monotonicity condition already encountered in [3]. The first two problems are very similar, but (IC) has been replaced by (H1) and (H2) and (PC) is expressed in terms of V instead of U . This replacement is a trick introduced by Myerson in his 1981 paper. We will show later on how we can compare Problems 2 and 3, but note that Problem 3 is simpler, as the optimization part can be solved pointwise (and x can be deduced from this pointwise optimization). The main result of this paper is that the three problems have the same solution. 3.1. Necessary conditions for Problem 1 We derive some necessary conditions for a solution of Problem 1. In fact, we only use constraint (IC) to deduce the two next results. The first lemma indicates that any 7 solution of the first problem should be such that Q is monotonous. This is a classic result already introduced in [4] and [3], for instance. The novelty here is that in the context of piecewise linear production cost functions, this monotonicity result is expressed in a vectorial sense. Lemma 1 (Q monotonicity). If (q, x, h) is admissible for Problem 1, then for all agent i ∈ I and all (ci, c(cid:48) i) ∈ C2 i (ci − c(cid:48) where . is the scalar product in RN . Proof. We omit the i in the proof, as it plays no role. First, let (c, c(cid:48)) ∈ C2 constraint, i).(Qi(ci) − Qi(c(cid:48) i)) ≤ 0 i by the (IC) (12) (13) (14) i.e. U (c, c) ≥ U (c, c(cid:48)) and U (c(cid:48), c(cid:48)) ≥ U (c(cid:48), c) X(c) −(cid:88) X(c(cid:48)) −(cid:88) j∈J cj(cid:48) cjQj(c) ≥ X(c(cid:48)) −(cid:88) Qj(c(cid:48)) ≥ X(c) −(cid:88) j∈J cj(cid:48) Qj(c). cjQj(c(cid:48)) j∈J j∈J We get the lemma after the summation of the two inequalities and simplification. Lemma 1 indicates that an agent should be producing less on average in his ith working zone if he is bidding a higher marginal cost for this working zone. Lemma 2. If (q, x, h) is admissible for Problem 1 then for any agent (omitting i) for any c, t1 and t2 V (c1, . . . , cj−1, t1, cj+1, . . . , cN ) =V (c1, . . . , cj−1, t2, cj+1, . . . , cN ) (cid:90) t1 − Qj(c1, . . . , cj−1, s, cj+1, . . . , cN )ds (15) t2 Proof. The inequality U (c, c) ≤ U (c, c(cid:48)) implies that c(cid:48) → U (c, c(cid:48)) is maximal at c for any c ∈ Ci. Moreover, t → U ((c1, .., cj−1, t, cj+1.., cN ), c) = X(c) − (cid:88) ckQk(c) − tQj(c) (16) k∈J\{j} is absolutely continuous, differentiable with respect to t for all c, and its derivative is −Qj(c). By definition of qj, Qj ≤ ¯q. The envelope theorem yield the result. 3.2. Necessary conditions for Problem 2 We derive some necessary conditions for a solution of Problem 2. Lemma 3. If (q, x, h) is an optimal solution to Problem 2 then (omitting i) for all c ∈ Ci (cid:90) cj+ (cid:88) j∈J cj V (c) = Qj(c1 . . . cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . , cN +)dt. (17) 8 Proof. According to (H1) (cid:88) (cid:90) cj+ j∈J cj (cid:88) j∈J Qj(c1 . . . cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . , cN +)dt = V (c1, .., cj−1, cj, c(j+1)+, . . . , cN +) − V (c1, .., cj−1, c(j)+, . . . , cN +) = V (c) − V (c1+, . . . , cN +). This is an expression for V (c) as a sum of a positive function of c and a constant V (c1+, . . . , cN +). It is clear that to optimize the criteria, this constant should be as small as possible. The participation contraint (PC) imposes that V (c1+, . . . , cN +) ≥ 0, therefore V (c1+, . . . , cN +) = 0. A consequence of this is: Corollary 1. If (q, x, h) is an optimal solution of Problem 2 then for all i ∈ I, Vi(c1+ i , . . . , cN + i ) = 0. (18) Proof. See the proof of Lemma 3. Corollary 1 means that if an agent bids a production cost function that is the max- imum of what he could bid, he should not make any profit, which is why he should be paid exactly his production cost. We see with this lemma that if the public information is inaccurate and the real cost of an agent is higher than what could be expected, then there is a risk that the participation constraint is not satisfied. On the other hand, it should not be surprising that an agent can have a zero profit: remember that in the extreme case in which the principal knows everything (discussed in §2), the agents do not make any profit. Another consequence of lemma 3 is Lemma 4. If (q, x, h) is an optimal solution of Problem 2, the expected profit of agent i (over his type) is Qj i (c1, . . . , cj, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)K j i (c)fi(c)dc. (19) (cid:90) (cid:88) EVi(c) = j∈J (c1..cn)∈Ci Proof. By Lemma 3 and Fubini's lemma, EVi(c) is equal to (cid:88) j∈J = (cid:90) (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) cj+ c−j∈C−j cj =cj− t=cj i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)dt Qj cj j∈J i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+ Qj i , . . . cN + i )fi(c)dtdcjdc−j. (cid:90) cj+ E(cid:88) 9 Our task is now to compute the inner term. Applying again Fubini's lemma, this term is equal to i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)fi(c)dtdcj = Qj (cid:90) cj+ t=cj− i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)fi(c)dcjdt = Qj cj =cj− i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)( Qj (cid:90) t i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)( Qj t=cj− fi(c)dcj)dt = cj =cj− fi(c) dcj)fi(c−j, t)dt = (cid:90) t fi(c−j, t) i (c1, . . . , cj−1, t, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)K j Qj cj =cj− i (t)fi(c−j, t)dt = i (c1, . . . , cj−1, cj, c(j+1)+, . . . cN +)K j Qj i (cj)fi(ci)dcj (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) t t=cj (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) cj+ t=cj− cj =cj− (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) cj+ t=cj− cj =cj− (cid:88) j∈J We get the lemma by summing all the inner terms. Lemma 5. If (H1) is satisfied, then for any (a, b) ∈ C2 i (omitting i) X(a) − X(b) = [ajQj(a) − bjQj(b) + Qj(b1 . . . bj−1, t, aj+1 . . . aN )dt] (20) (cid:90) bj aj Proof. Because of its length the proof is detailed in Appendix Appendix A i is independent of cj(cid:48) Lemma 6. If (q, x, h) verifies (H1) and (H2) and Qj then for all (c, c) ∈ C2 i U (c, c) ≥ U (c, c). for j(cid:48) > j, (21) Proof. Since (H1) is satisfied, equation (20) of Lemma 5 applies. We combine this relation with the definition of the expected profit U from (5). We obtain: U (c, c) − U (c, c) = cjQj(c) − cjQj(c)+ j∈J Qj(c1, ..., cj−1, t, cj+1, ...cN )dt + cjQj(c) − cjQj(c) (cid:90) cj = (cj − cj)Qj(c1, ..., cj−1, cj)) + Qj(c1, ..., cj−1, t)dt (cid:90) cj (cid:88) j∈J cj = cj Qj(c1, ..., cj−1, t) − Qj(c1, ..., cj−1, cj)dt, (cid:88) (cid:90) cj (cid:88) cj j∈J where we used the independence hypothesis for the second equality. By (H2), which implies the decreasingness of Qj with respect to cj i when all other quantities are fixed, 10 (cid:82) b a = −(cid:82) a if cj < cj then for any t ∈ [cj, cj], Qj(t) − Qj(cj) ≥ 0. Otherwise, we use the formula b and the fact that any t ∈ [cj, cj] verifies Qj(t) − Qj(cj) ≤ 0. Therefore U (c, c) − U (c, c) is non negative. 3.3. Necessary conditions for Problem 3 We derive some properties for Problem 3. Lemma 7. There is an optimal solution (q, x, h) for Problem 3 such that qj is independent of ck i for k (cid:54)= j. i (and Qj i ) Proof. First note that x is not taking any role in the optimization problem: it is defined afterward. The only real optimization variables are then q and h. Remember that qj i is i = min((qi− (j− 1)¯q)+, ¯q). The constraints are defined for defined as a function of q by qj each c ∈ Cn and the integral criterion is in fact a sum of independent criteria depending on q(c) for c ∈ Cn. Therefore we can solve Problem 3 with a pointwise optimization. By the discernability assumption, for any c ∈ Cn and i ∈ I, cj i ) is increasing i )) is a convex criteria in qi and therefore the pointwise problem corresponds to Problem 4 of §5. In particular, we can apply Lemma 10 from the next section. Thus qj i only depends on cj i and c−i. This property is preserved by integration over the c−i: Qj i only depends on cj i . in j. Therefore for all c ∈ Cn, i ∈ I,(cid:80) i + K j i + K j i (c)(cj j∈J qj i (cj i (cj We point out that, since the pointwise problem has a unique solution, the pointwise optimal solution introduced in the proof is uniquely defined. Theorem 2. If (q, x, h) is the pointwise optimal solution of Problem 3 and K j in cj i for (i, j) ∈ I × J and c ∈ Ci, then for all i ∈ I, Qi is C∞ over Ci. i is smooth i → cj i (cj i (cj i + K j i + K j i instead of cj i . Since S = ∪k∈NS(ck Proof. Remember that cj i ) is increasing, so by composition with smooth bijection, we can do the proof as if the costs involved were cj i ). According to Lemma 11, qi is continuous. Since qi is bounded, we can apply the domi- nated convergence theorem to show that Qi is continuous. We can then we proceed by mathematical induction. Assume that Qi is C l, then take c0 i a sequence in Ci that converges to c0 i ) is a countable union of null measured set (by Lemma 22), its measure is zero. Without changing the results, we can compute the integrals on C−i\ S instead of C−i. Since qi and its derivatives are bounded, we can apply the dominated convergence theorem to compute the limit of Q(l) i (ck i ) as k goes to +∞ as the integral of a limit. Since we removed the point over which this limit was not defined, we get that Q(l) has a limit, and this limit does not depend on the sequence ck i . So Qi is l + 1 times derivable at ci, for all ci. We conclude by induction. i ∈ Ci and ck i )−Q(l) i (c0 i −ck c0 i )−Q(l) i (c0 i −ck c0 i (ck i ) i i 3.4. Resolution of the mechanism design problem Last but not least, we state the main result of the Section. 11 Theorem 3. Let (qj (cid:88) (cid:88) i , h) be defined such that for any c ∈ Cn, (qj qj i (cj i , c−i)(cj i + K j i (cj i )) i (cj i , c−i), h(c)) solves minimize qj i ,h i∈I j∈J subject to 0 ≤ qj i ≤ ¯q(cid:88) j∈J hi,i(cid:48)(c) ≥ 0, i(cj qi i , c−i) + (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) hi(cid:48),i(c) − hi,i(cid:48)(c) − h2 i,i(cid:48)(c) + h2 i(cid:48),i(c) 2 ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di and set (cid:88) j∈J qi(c) = i (cj qj i , c−i) and xi(c) = (cid:88) j∈J i (cj qj i , c−i)cj i + (cid:90) cj+ i cj i qj i (t, c−i)dt, (22) then (q, h, x) solves the optimal mechanism design problem (Problem 1). Proof. • First note that (q, h, x) is the pointwise solution of Problem 3 so it is optimal for Problem 3, moreover, by construction (q, h, x) satisfies (SD) and h ≥ 0. • Then note that by Lemma 4, (q, h, x) solves a relaxation of Problem 2, but is it admissible for Problem 2 ? • By definition of V (omitting i), V (c1 . . . aj . . . cN ) − V (c1 . . . bj . . . cN ) = Ex(c1 . . . aj . . . cN ) − x(c1 . . . aj . . . cN ) − [Qj(aj)aj − Qj(bj)bj] = (cid:90) cj+ i aj Eqj i (aj, c−i)aj + i (t, c−i)dt − Eqj i (bj, c−i)bj − (cid:90) bj qj −[Qj(aj)aj − Qj(bj)bj] = E (cid:90) cj+ (cid:90) bj bj i qj i (t, c−i)dt qj i (t, c−i)dt = Qj i (t)dt aj aj where we used the definition of x, the definition of Q and Fubini lemma's for the second, third and fourth equalities. Threfore (q, h, x) satisfies (H1). • By construction, qj i +K j i (cj i is non-increasing in cj i , c−i)) ≤ 0, so by integration with respect to c−i, (aj i ) then using the third assumption, i , c−i) − qj i is non-increasing in cj i ) ≤ 0 qj i (bj i (bj and then by summation over j, (c − c(cid:48)).(Qi(c) − Qi(c(cid:48))) ≤ 0, i.e. (H2) is satisfied. i ) = 0 by construction of x. i so for any (a, b, c−i) ∈ C2 × C−i, (aj i )(Qj • Since (H1) is satisfied, Vi(ci) ≥ Vi(c+ i ). Moreover, Vi(c+ Therefore the participation constraint (PC) is satisfied. i )(qj i (aj i )−Qj i − bj i (aj i −bj • Therefore (q, h, x) is admissible for Problem 2. So it solves Problem 2. • Since (q, h, x) solves Problem 2, by Lemma 6 the incentive compatibility constraint (IC) is satisfied. Moreover, by Lemma 3, (PC) is satisfied. Thus (q, h, x) is admis- sible for Problem 1, but is it optimal ? 12 • By Lemmas 1 and 2, any optimal solution of Problem 1 should be admissible for Problem 2. Since the criteria are the same, we conclude that (q, h, x) is an optimal solution of Problem 1. 3.5. Comments In the optimal mechanism, the agents are paid at a marginal price which is equal to their bid augmented by an information rent. This information rent depends on the prob- lem structure since it is built from a collection of allocation problems, and it depends on the available information by the fact that, in these optimization problems, the marginal prices are replaced by the virtual marginal prices cj i ). We point out that, as already noted in [19], the computation of such rent may pose a practical difficulty for large problems. i + K j i (cj Notice that, by construction, the optimal mechanism is incentive compatible no mat- ter the value of K since (H1) is verified anyway as long as the hypotheses are satisfied. If this market is repeated over time, the principal can learn the distribution of the pro- ducers' cost parameters. The model extends to the case in which some nodes do not have a producer and where for others, the demand is null. In particular, we can consider the buyer/suppliers setting where there is demand only at one node. One may argue that one limit of the current result is that it does not take into account any network constraints. Nonetheless, the structure of the proof makes it clear that we exploited only some properties of the allocation problem. Therefore, the optimal mechanism construction is valid for any market for which the allocation problem satisfies these properties. We detail this argument in the next section. In addition, the optimal mechanism construction is valid for limiting case in which In this case, one needs to specify the definition of q since the r = 0 at some edges. solution of the allocation problem may not be a singleton. 4. Extension to General Network Constraints We now explain why the optimal mechanism proposal can be extended to a large variety of network constraints. This extension is of particular importance for power mar- ket networks, since the admissibility of an allocation is subject to its physical feasibility. While this difficulty can be avoided as long as the network is radial, the general case is known to bring its lot of technical challenges. As argued in [20] , the allocation problem can be written: min(cid:80) i Ji (qi) s.t. gi(h) + qi = di, i = 1, 2, . . . , n Ah + Bq = b q ∈ Q h ∈ H, (23) With gi being concave functions, A and B are p× m and p× n real matrices; b ∈ Rp, and H and Q are (convex) products of segments in Rm and Rn respectively. 13 They observe that whenever the multipliers of the first set of constraints in (23) are positive (), then the optimal solution of (23) is also a solution of min(cid:80) i Ji (qi) s.t. (h, q) ∈ C where and C = {(h, q) ∈ X s.t. gi(h) + qi ≥ di, i = 1, 2, . . . , n} X = {(h, q) s.t. Ah + Bq = bh ∈ H, q ∈ Q}. We assume that () is satisfied. Otherwise said, we require the sub-gradient of the value of (24) to be positive. We could equivalently require the uniqueness of the solution of (24). We can then focus on the study of (24). We denote by δC the support function of C and set U = {u = (u1, . . . , un)ui ≤ 0} Applying Theorem 10.1 from [21], we get that a necessary and sufficient condition for an allocation to be optimal is that: (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (cid:88) i 0 ∈ ∂ Ji(qi) + δC(h, q), Now observe that (cid:40) z −(cid:88) ∂δC(h, q) = NC(h, q) = yi∇(gi(h) + qi)(h, qi)y ∈ NU ([gi(h) + qi]i), z ∈ NX (h, q) (cid:41) i The last equation requires the qualification constraint (Q) from [22] to be satisfied, so one can use Theorem 4.3 from [22]. Still, note that no matter Q being satisfied, NC does not depends on c. Theorem 4. If (*) is satisfied, then qj mechanism proposed ib the previous section can be applied to (23). i is independent of ck i for k (cid:54)= j, moreover, the i ∈ i }. i ∈ {0, ¯qj i ∈]0, ¯qj Proof. Fix c and consider the associated optimal allocation q. Observe that either qj ]0, ¯qj i [ or qj i [, take k (cid:54)= j then ck First case. If qj i does not appear in the first order condition (27). By Berge's Maximum Principle [23], the optimal allocation is upper hemicontinuous with respect to the parameter ck i , by unicity of the solution of (24), we get that qi is continuous with respect to ck i is still in ]0, ¯qj i , by unicity of the solution, qj i [. In this neighbourhood, condition (27) is satisfied for qj i on this neighbourhood. i . Thus there is a neighbourhood of ck i is constant with respect to ck i such that qj i = qj i ∈ {0, ¯qj i }. Without loss of generality, let us assume that qj Second case. qj i = ¯qj i . Here, we need to observe that the sub-differential of the criteria with respect to qi is [cj i , cj+1 ], thus the reasoning of the first case can be reproduce whenever k (cid:54)= j + 1. So we only need to deal with the situation where k = j + 1. Moreover, since qi is non-increasing in cj+1 i . Observe that by i can potentially trigger a change in qj , only an increase of cj+1 i i 14 . If it happens to take a value different than ¯qj Berge's Maximum Principle, qj i is continuous with respect to the parameter of interest cj+1 i , then this value is also a solution to i (27) for the initial parameters, which is in contradiction with the unicity of the solution of (27). 4.1. Discussion on the non-overlaping zone assumption We show here how the non-overlaping zone structure naturally emerges if we envision slightly different context and adapt the notations accordingly: (1) we focus on a specific producer, and refer to him implicitly in this paragraph, (2) we assume the competition is known, (3) we only suppose the types distribution to have a density f over C 4, denoting by fj the marginals, (4) it will prove to be convenient to use q ∗ c := C c(q) and denote by j(q) the integer part of q/¯q. Let q and x be some optimal allocation and payment rules for the producer. We assume q and x are continuous and have derivatives almost everywhere. The producer's profit is x(s) − q(s) ∗ c whenever his type is c and he signals himself as of type s. When the competition is known, we pinpoint that for any value q = q(c) of the allocation function, there should be a unique payment that we denote by xq. If it was not the case, then the producer would be better off revealing what is required to get the highest possible payment at q, which violates the incentive compatibility constraints (IC). We observe that, by (IC), x(q) − q ∗ c is maximal at qc, which implies in particular that cj(q) ∈ ∂qx(qc). Hence, almost everywhere and whenever q is not a multiple of ¯q, If we take s ∈ C such that q(s) is not a multiple of ¯q, then by (IC) we know that c → x(c)− q(c)∗ s should be maximal at s. Take t such that tj(q(c)) = sj(q(c)) and q(t) (cid:54)= q(s), then we should have j(q(t)) (cid:54)= j(q(s)) which would imply a discontinuity of q somewhere. Hence: whenever sj(q(s)) = tj(q(s)), q(s) = q(t) ((cid:63)(cid:63)). Let Ck = {c ∈ C, j(q(c)) = k}, k = inf{ck, c ∈ Ck}, and c+ k = sup{ck, c ∈ Ck}. By combining ((cid:63)(cid:63)) with the monotony c− of q, we get that the intersection of the [c− cj(q) is uniquely defined. Setting cq = cj(q), we observe that xq =(cid:82) q j ] has an empty interior. 0 ctdt((cid:63)). j , c+ 4.2. Examples with log-concave functions We point out that a sufficient condition to check the monotone likelihood ratio prop- erty is that F/f is increasing. If F is a smooth cumulative distribution function with f being the corresponding smooth and positive density, then F/f is increasing iff f /F is decreasing iff ln F (cid:48) is decreasing iff ln F is concave. A function f is said to be log-concave if ln f is concave. Many density functions encountered in economic and engineering liter- ature are log-concave: the uniform, the normal, the exponential and the power function and the Laplace distribution all have log-concave density functions. We refer to [24] for the results we use on this class of functions. The class of log-concave is stable by monotonic transformation and truncation. Moreover, it happens that if a probability density distribution is log-concave, then the corresponding cumulative distribution is log-concave. In mechanism design theory, it is standard to assume F is log-concave [25]. We want to see the implication of the discernability assumption. This assumption . We compute this gap for imposes a gap ∆ equals to K j and c(j+1)− i ) between cj+ i (cj+ i i 4we still keep non decreasing marginal costs, otherwise we would loose the continuity of q 15 some standard cases. To simplify the notations and the computation, we assume without loss of generality that cj− = 0 and write cj+ = c+. This results in the following table: Table 1: The gap ∆ for some standard probabilities Name Uniform Power Function Weibull Laplace Exponential (reversed) ∝ f (x) 1 c+ )λ−1 λ( x c+ )λ−1e(− x λ( x 2 e−λx− c+ 2 λe−(c+−x)λ 1 c+ )λ ∝ F (x) x c+( x c+ )λ c+(1 − e c+ )λ ) −λ c+ x > c+ e−c+λ(exλ − 1) −( x 2 , 2−e −λ(x− c+ 2 2 e 2λ K(x) x x λ c+ λ ( c+ x )λ−1(e( x c+ )λ − 1) ) 1−e−xλ λ ∆ c+ c+ λ c+ e−1 λ (e c+ 2 1−e−c+ λ λ 2 λ − 1) λ We truncate the probabilities so that they have support in [0, c+]. The symbole ∝ means that we express f and F modulo the multiplication by a common constant (due to the truncation) and λ is a positive parameter that should be greater than 1 for the Power function and the Weibull probability. For the uniform distribution, we see that the intervals should be of non-decreasing sizes. For instance, one could take c1 ∈ [¯c, 2¯c], c2 ∈ [3¯c, 4¯c], c3 ∈ [5¯c, 6¯c], etc. For the Power, the Weibull and the exponential functions, we see that the gap could be made smaller. 5. Study of the allocation problem 5.1. The standard auction problem The previous section motivates the study of the allocation problem for different rea- sons. Firstly, as we have already pointed out in the proofs, the results of §3 rely on some properties of the solution of the standard allocation problem. In addition to those properties, we derive in this section an algorithm to compute the solution of the standard allocation problem. According to 3, these algorithms can be used for both the original auction problem and the optimal mechanism design. To benchmark the mechanism de- sign equilibrium against an equilibrium of the Bayesian game related to the standard auction, numerical efficiency is pivotal: indeed, the Bayesian equilibrium estimation re- quires a large number of allocations computations. Let us first introduce the standard allocation problem. In a standard mechanism, the principal solves an allocation problem based on the bids he receives. Those bids i , where as before i ∈ I corresponds to the ith agent and j ∈ J will be denoted by cj corresponds to the jth working zone with constant marginal price. To model the fact that the production costs are piecewise linear, we use some positive variables qj i so that qj i and the related i . As before, an allocation should satisfy the constraint that i ≤ ¯q, for any i ∈ I, the quantity produced by agent i is qi =(cid:80) production cost is(cid:80) j∈J qj j∈J cj i qj production exceeds demand. We end up with Problem 4: 16 Problem 4. (cid:88) (cid:88) minimize (q,h) i∈I j∈J subject to ∀i ∈ I : i i cj qj (cid:88) qj i + (cid:88) j∈J i(cid:48)∈V (i) ∀(i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E : hi,i(cid:48) ≥ 0 i ≥ 0 ∀(i, j) ∈ I × J : qj ∀(i, j) ∈ I × J : qj i ≤ ¯q hi(cid:48),i − hi,i(cid:48) − h2 i,i(cid:48) + h2 i(cid:48),i 2 ri,i(cid:48) ≥ di (λi) (30) (γi,i(cid:48)) (µi,j) (νi,j). in parentheses. Those variables are in R+. The notations for the dual the variables associated with each constraint are indicated For any node i ∈ I, we define the function Fi for λ ∈ [mini c1 i , maxi cN i ]n Fi(λi, λ−i) = di + λi(cid:48) − λi (λi(cid:48) − λi)2 2ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48))2 . + (31) i(cid:48)∈V (i) ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) (cid:88) Later on we justify that this function could be interpreted as the production of agent i when the multipliers are λi and λ−i. Its partial derivative with respect to λi is 4 ri,i(cid:48) λ2 i(cid:48) (λi + λi(cid:48))3 < 0. (32) ∂λiFi(λi, λ−i) = − (cid:88) (cid:40) 4 i(cid:48)∈V (i) ∂λi(cid:48) Fi(λi, λ−i) = ri,i(cid:48) 0 The derivative is negative: when i increases its price it is assigned smaller production quantities. The partial derivative of Fi for i(cid:48) ∈ I\{i} is λi(cid:48) λi (λi+λi(cid:48) )3 > 0 if i(cid:48) ∈ V (i) else. (33) When another agent becomes less competitive, i is assigned more production. Let k ∈ J ∪ {0}. The limit at +∞ and 0 of Fi(x, λ−i) − k ¯q are lim x→+∞ Fi(x, λ−i) − k ¯q = di − k ¯q − (cid:88) (cid:88) x→+∞ Fi(x, λ−i) − k ¯q = di − k ¯q + lim j∈V (i) j∈V (i) 2ri,j 1 2ri,j 3 (34) (35) . and Without loss of generality (otherwise we could impose capacity constraints), we assume, the first term to be strictly negative and the second to be strictly positive, hence by the intermediate value theorem, Fi − k ¯q has a zero. Since Fi − k ¯q is decreasing in λi, this solution is unique. Now we define for i ∈ I and k ∈ J ∪ {0}, gk i as the function that associates any λ−i ∈ [mini c1 i ]n−1 with the unique x such that and Fi(x, λ−i) = k ¯q and x > 0: i , maxi cN i (λ−i), λ−i) = k ¯q Fi(gk gk i (λ−i) > 0. 17 (36) Lemma 8. For any i ∈ I, k ∈ J ∪ {0}, λ−i ∈ [mini c1 i , maxi cN i ]n−1 and i(cid:48) ∈ V (i) ∂λi(cid:48) gk In particular, gk i (λ−i) > 0. i is increasing in λi(cid:48) for i(cid:48) ∈ V (i). Proof. According to the implicit function theorem = − ∂Fi ∂λi(cid:48) i (λ−i) ∂λi(cid:48) ∂gk / ∂Fi ∂λi (37) (38) , It is clear that gk i (λ−i) is decreasing in k. We proceed with the computation of the dual of Problem 4. If a strong duality theorem applies, then we should have (cid:88) qj i cj i + ri,i(cid:48))} i∈I,j∈J i,i(cid:48) + h2 i(cid:48),i 2 min q,h max λ,γ,ν,µ hi(cid:48),i − hi,i(cid:48) − h2 (cid:88) γi,jhi,j + νi,j(qj i − ¯q) − µi,jqj i + νi,j − λi − µi,j) i i∈I,j∈J i (cj νi,j ¯q + qj hi,i(cid:48){λi − λi(cid:48) − γi,j} + h2 i,i(cid:48)ri,i(cid:48) λi + λi(cid:48) 2 , (cid:88) i∈I λi{di − ( i(cid:48)∈V (i) j∈J qj i + (cid:88) (cid:88) − (cid:88) (cid:88) λidi − (cid:88) (cid:88) i∈I,j∈J i∈I i∈I,j∈J + (i,i(cid:48))∈E = max λ,γ,νµ min q,h so that for any (i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E, by necessary and sufficient first order condition . (39) By replacing h by its expression in the dual variables we get something equivalent to maximize (λ,γ,µ,ν) (λi − λi(cid:48) − γi,j)2 2ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) } i + νi,j ≥ λi + µi,j. The expression of γ with respect to λ follows. For any (i, i(cid:48)) ∈ E subject to ∀(i, j) ∈ I × J cj hi,i(cid:48) = γi,i(cid:48) + λi(cid:48) − λi ri,i(cid:48)(λi(cid:48) + λi) {λidi −(cid:88) (cid:88) νi,k ¯q − (cid:88) i∈I j∈J i(cid:48)∈V (i) (cid:40) γi,i(cid:48) = 0 λi − λi(cid:48) if λi ≤ λi(cid:48) else (cid:88) {λidi −(cid:88) νi,j ¯q − (cid:88) i∈I j∈J i(cid:48)∈V (i) thus the dual problem is equivalent to maximize (λ,µ,ν) subject to ∀(i, j) ∈ I × J cj 18 i + νi,j ≥ λi + µi,j, (λi − λi(cid:48))2 4ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) } (40) (41) (42) because µ does not play any role in the admissibility of the other variables nor in the objective, this is equivalent to (cid:88) {λidi −(cid:88) νi,j ¯q − (cid:88) i∈I j∈J i(cid:48)∈V (i) i + νi,j ≥ λi, subject to ∀(i, j) ∈ I × J cj maximize (λ,ν) (λi − λi(cid:48))2 4ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) The expression of ν follows. For any (i, j) ∈ I × J } (43) (44) νi,j = 0 λi − cj i if λi ≤ cj else. i We can now justify that we have strong duality: the operator is continuous, convex- concave and the dual variables are restricted to be in a bounded set. The dual of the allocation problem is therefore written: (cid:88) i∈I {λidi − ¯q (λi − cj i )δλi≥cj i − (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) (λi − λi(cid:48))2 4ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) }, maximize λ≥0 where (cid:40) (cid:88) j∈J (cid:40) 1 0 δx≥y = For i ∈ I we maximize the criteria (cid:88) j∈J λidi − ¯q (λi − cj i )δλi≥cj i if x ≥ y else. − (cid:88) i(cid:48)∈V (i) (λi − λi(cid:48))2 4ri,i(cid:48)(λi + λi(cid:48)) , (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) which is strictly concave for any λ−i (sum of concave and strictly concave functions). We denote by Λi(λ−i) its maximizer. The first order necessary and sufficient condition on Λi is: 0 ∈ Fi(Λi, λ−i) − Ki(Λi), where Ki(λi) =  0 [j − 1, j]¯q j ¯q N ¯q if λi < c1 i if λi = cj i if λi ∈]cj i , cj+1 if λi ∈ λi ∈]cN i [, j (cid:54)= N i , ¯c[, We conclude Lemma 9. For any i ∈ I and any λ−i ∈ [mini c1 solution of i , maxi cN i ]n−1, Λi(λ−i) is the unique Fi(Λi, λ−i) ∈ Ki(Λi). (50) We point out that the primal (and dual) solution unicity is a desirable property that is not systematic for the allocation problems of centralized market models. The expression of h with respect to λ (39) together with the fact the fact the supply constraint should be binding at optimality justify the interpretation of Fi proposed at the beginning of this subsection. In the following sequel we use this property many times. 19 5.2. Some properties of the solution If r and d are set, we can see the solution of Problem 4 as a function of the vector c ∈ Cn. We denote by q(c) the solution of Problem 4 with the cost vector c. Similarly, we define qi(c), qj i (c), λ(c) and λi(c). We give here two properties of the allocation problem solution. By integration, we showed in the previous section that the solution of the mechanism design inherits those properties. Lemma 10. Let (q(c), h(c)) be a solution of Problem 4, then qj i for l (cid:54)= j: cl i (c1, . . . cj−1, cj, cj+1 . . . , cN ; c−i) = qj qj (51) Proof. Let i ∈ I, j ∈ J, c−i ∈ Cn−1, c = (c1, . . . , cN ) ∈ C and s = (s1, . . . , sN ) ∈ C i (c, c−i). We denote by λc (resp. such that sj = cj. We shall prove that qj λs) the dual variables associated with the nodal contraints for the allocation problem parametrized with c (resp. s). First if i (s, c−i) = qj i (s1, . . . sj−1, cj, sj+1 . . . , sN ; c−i) i (c) does not depend on i (c, c−i) ∈]0, ¯q[, qj (52) i = cj then by lemma 9 λc which we deduce that qj i and using Lemma 9 again, λs i (c, c−i) = qj i (s, c−i). Therefore without loss of generality, we can assume that i (s, c−i) = 0. i (c, c−i) = ¯q qj and qj i = cj i . Therefore λs = λc, from (53) Then using Lemma 9 we get i ≥ ck λc and λs i ≤ ck, (54) i , then λc−i ≥ λs−i by non-decreasingness of Λi(cid:48), i(cid:48) ∈ I\{i} so that λc (explained in §5.3) Therefore all the other agents are producing less, which is absurd since i is already producing less. i ≥ λs i . If λc i > λs We extend the notations by setting for all i ∈ I, c0 i = c∗. We consider the subset S of C for which at some nodes i, the multiplicator λi is equal to the marginal cost and the production is a multiple of ¯q (i.e. stuck in an angle): S = {c ∈ Cn, qi(c) = j ¯q and λi(c) = cj(cid:48) for some i ∈ I, j ∈ J ∪{0}, j(cid:48) ∈ {j, j + 1}}. (55) The set S corresponds to the points of transition between the two possibilities defined by the first order condition (48). Because of the angle, it is natural to think that this is where irregularities may happen (see the proof of the next lemma). We introduce this set to show some regularity properties of q and Q. We detail the proof in the Appendix. The approach consists in showing that S is a finit union of sets of zero measure. This is also true for the projection of S on the {ci} × C−i. Then we observe that on C\S, the relations between the primal and dual variables are smooth. Lemma 11. The function q is C∞ on Cn\S and C 0 on Cn. i Proof. We postpone the proof to Appendix Appendix B 20 5.3. Fixed point In this subsection we show that the solution of the dual problem is the unique fixed point of a monotone operator. We define Λ(λ1, ..., λn) = (Λ1(λ−1), ..., Λn(λ−n)). (56) Lemma 12. For any i ∈ I, Λi is non-decreasing. Proof. Let λ−i < λ(cid:48) decreasing in the first variable and increasing in the second −i and the corresponding Λi and Λ(cid:48) i. Assume Λi > Λ(cid:48) i. Since Fi is Fi(Λi, λ−i) < Fi(Λ(cid:48) i, λ(cid:48) −i) (57) −i) ∈ i, λ(cid:48) Moreover for any x ∈ K(Λ(cid:48) K(Λ(cid:48) i, λ(cid:48) i). Therefore Fi(Λ(cid:48) We will use the following classical result (see [17] for a proof and definition of complete i) and y ∈ K(Λi), x ≤ y and Fi(Λi, λ−i) ∈ K(Λi), Fi(Λ(cid:48) −i) ≤ Fi(Λi, λ−i) which is absurd. lattice). Theorem 5 (Knaster-Tarski fixed point). Let L be a complete lattice and let f an application from L to L and order preserving. Then the set of fixed points of f in L is a complete lattice. In particular, the set of fixed points is non empty. Since Λ is order preserving and [c∗, c∗]n is a lattice when we consider the natural order, there is a fixed point, and the set of fixed points is a lattice. Lemma 13. λ is optimal for the dual ⇔ λ is a fixed point of Λ. Proof. • If λ is optimal for the dual, then each component i maximizes the criteria (47), thus λ is a fixed point of Λ. • If λ is a fixed point of Λ, then by definition, each component i maximizes the criteria (47). Hence since the problem is (strictly) concave, λ is optimal. A consequence of the previous lemma is that Lemma 14. The set of fixed points of Λ is a singleton. Definition 1 (Continuous for monotone sequence). We consider the natural partial order on Rn. We say that a function G is continuous for monotone (resp. increasing, decreasing) sequences if for any monotone (resp. increasing, decreasing) sequence xn converging to a point x in the domain of G, G(xn) goes to G(x) as n goes to infinity. Clearly, a function is continuous for monotone sequences if and only if it is continuous for increasing and decreasing sequences. Lemma 15. The operator Λ is continuous for monotone sequences. The intuition of the proof is that we can use the monotony of the sequence and Lemma 9 to characterize the behaviour of Λ on the neighborhood. We find that Λ is either constant or characterized by the implicit function theorem. 21 • If Λi(¯λ−i) ∈]cj Proof. Let ¯λ−i, j ∈ [1 . . . N ], we first deal with the 'nice' case, that corresponds to Fi(Λ(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) ∈]j − 1, j[¯q i , cj+1 [ (we do not treat the case j = N , which is very similar to what follows) then since Fi is C∞ and of invertible derivative (non zero) in λi, the implicit function theorem tells us that the solution ψ of Fi(ψ(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) = j ¯q is continous in a neighborhood B of ¯λ−i. Thus we can make B small enough so that for λ−i ∈ B, ψ(λ−i) ∈]cj [. On this neighborhood, ψ satisfies the first order conditions and so by unicity of the solution of the optimization problem, since those conditions are sufficient, ψ = Λi on B. Therefore Λi is continous at ¯λ−i. i , cj+1 i i • If Λi(¯λ−i) = cj i (as before, we do not treat the case j = N ), then by Lemma 9 Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) = [j − 1, j]¯q, if Fi ∈]j − 1, j[¯q (we deal with the border case in the next point) then since Fi is continuous, there is a neighborhood B of ¯λ−i such that Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), λ−i) ∈]j − 1, j[¯q, so on B Λi is constant and therefore continuous. • We proceed with the borders. If Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) = (j − 1)¯q and Λi(¯λ−i) = cj i . + -- Decreasing case: Let us take ∈ Rn−1 such that Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i + ) ∈ [j − 1, j]¯q (Fi is continuous and increasing in λ−i). Then Λi(¯λ−i + ) = Λi(¯λ−i) checks the first order condition so Λ is constant, and we get the continuity for decreasing sequences. -- Increasing case: Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) = (j − 1)¯q hence there exists a ball B such that the implicit function theorem applies and there exists ψ such that Fi(ψ(¯λ−i − ), ¯λ−i − ) = (j − 1)¯q and ψ(¯λ−i) = Λi(¯λ−i) = cj i (remember that Λi(¯λ−i) = cj i by hypothesis) . Since Fi is increasing in the second variable and decreasing in the first, ψ is increasing. For of positive components and sufficiently small, ψ(¯λ−i − ) ∈]cj−1 i ) and check the first order condition. Therefore for of positive components and sufficiently small, ψ = Λi by uniqueness of the solution. Thus Λi is continuous for increasing sequence. i [ (since ψ(¯λ−i) = Λi(¯λ−i) = cj , cj i • We do the same analysis if Fi(Λi(¯λ−i), ¯λ−i) = j ¯q and Λi(¯λ−i) = cj i . The conclusion follows. We could have alternatively used the Berge Maximum theorem for strictly concave criterion to get the continuity of Λ. Yet, we chose to present this proof for pedagogical reasons because it contains some key ideas (see appendix). Theorem 6. The sequence (Λk(cN 1 ...cN n ))k∈N converges to the solution of the dual. n ) ≤ (cN 1 ...cN 1 ...cN 1 ...cN n ), and since Λ is order preserving, the sequence n ) = λk is non increasing and bounded, therefore it converge to a point x. Proof. Since Λ(cN Λk(cN Since Λ is continuous for monotone sequence, x is a fixed point. Theorem 7. For any i ∈ I, λ−i ∈ [c∗, c∗]n−1, Λi(λ−i) has the following explicite ex- pression: Λi(λ−i) = min{cN i , min j∈J {cj i 1Fi(cj i ,λ−i)<j ¯q}, min k∈[0..N−1] {gk i (λ−i)1gk i (λ−i)∈[ck i ,ck+1 i ]}} (58) 22 Proof. We denote by Gi the RHS of (58) and show that for any i Fi(Gi(λ−i), λ−i) ∈ K(G(λ−i)), (59) and then we conclude with a uniqueness argument. If there is j ∈ J such that Gi(λ−i) = cj i , λ−i) = j ¯q. Thus Fi(cj This last possibility implies by definition of gj j ¯q. Remember that K(G(λ−i)) = [j − 1, j]¯q. So we need to prove that Fi(cj (j − 1)¯q. Suppose the contrary, i.e. Fi(cj F (cj i (λ−i) = cj i . i , λ−i) ≤ i , λ−i) ≥ i , λ−i) < (j − 1)¯q. Then since Gi(λ−i) = cj i , i , then either Fi(cj i , λ−i) < j ¯q or gj i that Fi(cj i , λ−i) < (j − 1)¯q, which in turn implies that i (λ−i) < cj gj i . i , F (cj−1 i (λ−i) > cj−1 gj Now observe that since Gi(λ−i) = cj i i . , λ−i) > (j − 1)¯q, which implies that (60) (61) i and gj Combining (60) and (61) with the definition of G, we see that G(λ−i) ≤ gj G(λ−i) = cj i (λ−i). But Otherwise, let us assume that there is not such j. Then there is k ∈ [0 . . . N − 1] such i , Fi(Gi(λ−i), λ−i)) = k ¯q and by definition of ]. So again Fi(Gi(λ−i), λ−i)) ∈ K(Gi(λ−i)). We can now conclude i (λ−i). By definition of gk i , ck+1 i , which is absurd. Therefore Fi(cj i , λ−i) ≥ (j − 1)¯q. i (λ−i) < cj i that Gi(λ−i) = gk G, Gi(λ−i) ∈ [ck that Λ = G. We can interpret the fixed point algorithm as if some benevolent agents situated at each node of the network were exchanging information. They collectively try to minimize the total cost and, to do so, they communicate their current marginal costs. This marginal cost is the minimum of their local marginal cost and the marginal cost of importation from the adjacent nodes. At each iteration, the agents compute how much they are going to produce based on their current marginal cost. They then update their marginal cost based on the information they just received and transmit this marginal cost to the adjacent nodes. We point out that the information used by each agent is local. 5.4. Decreasing Rate We derive in this section an estimate for the decreasing rate. We denote α = max(e,e(cid:48))∈E2 re/re(cid:48). We have the following bound: Lemma 16. For any (i, i(cid:48), k, λ−i) ∈ E × [0, N ] × [c∗, c∗]n−1, ∂λigk i(cid:48)(λ−i) ≥ 1 N α ( c∗ c∗ )5. (62) Proof. We combine (38) with (32) and (33). Lemma 17. Since (λk for which at least one coordinate λk i satisfies i )k∈N is non-increasing for all i ∈ I, there is a finite number of k i > cq λk i and λk+1 i ≤ cq i 23 (63) cost time (s) Fixed Point CVX 83.195 83.2 2.03 30.23 cost time (s) Fixed Point CVX 4971.4 4971.4 28.39 35.23 Table 2: Results for a linear (a) and piecewise linear (b) instances of the problem solved with the fixed point algorithm and CVX. or i ( (65) i = cq λk i and λk+1 i < cq i . (cid:54)= λk i (64) We denote by K this set. Let (k1, k2) ∈ N2 such that [k1 − 1, k2 + 1] ∩ K = ∅. Then for k ∈ [k1, k2] and i ∈ I such that λk−1 i ≥ 1 N α i = Λi(λk−1−i )− Λi(λk−i). By construction, there exists i − λk+1 Proof. By definition of λk, λk j ∈ [0, N − 1] such that Λi(λk−1−i ) = gj i (λk−i). Then by monotony of g, gj i (λk−1−i ) and Λi(λk−i) = gj i (λk−1−i ) is lower bounded by c∗ c∗ )5 max i(cid:48)∈V (i) i(cid:48) − λk (λk−1 i(cid:48)) i (λk−i) − gj i − λk+1 λk ∂λi(cid:48) gj i ∞(λk−1 i(cid:48) − λk i(cid:48)), (66) for i(cid:48) ∈ V (i). We then take the i(cid:48) ∈ V (i) that maximizes (λk−1 lemma to get the result. i(cid:48) −λk i(cid:48)) and use the previous 5.5. Algorithm Implementation We implemented this algorithm in Matlab. We used a dichotomy to compute the gk i . Note that for linear cost the analysis is similar. We define gi(λ−i) as the unique x such that fi(x, λ−i) = 0 and x ≥ 0 and define Λ such that Λi(λ) = min(ci, gi(λ−i)) (67) We performed some numerical comparisons with CVX, a package for specifying and solving convex programs [26, 27] for both linear and piecewise linear production cost functions. We generated a graph with 100 nodes connected randomly. To generate the graph, we used a Barabasi-Albert model [28] to ensure some scaling properties. The experiment was performed on a personal laptop (OSX, 4 Go,1.3 GHz Intel Core i5). The networks randomly generated to test the implementations are displayed in Figures 1a and 1b, and the results are summarized in Table 2. Both CVX and the fixed point algorithm converges to an estimate of the optimal value. We did not try to optimize the numerical algorithm, but some trick could be used to avoid the costly estimation of the gs. Still, the linear version of the fixed point algorithm was about ten times faster than the CVX resolution. Note that the algorithm could be distributed, since at each iteration, the computation at each node only depends on the values of the previous iteration. 24 (a) The network generated to test the linear implementation of the algorithm (b) The network generated to test the generic implementation of the algorithm 6. Conclusion In this paper we have shown how to characterize and compute the optimal mechanism for a network market. We observed in particular that the allocation problem for the optimal and the standard mechanism are the same. We have proposed an algorithm based on a fixed point to solve the allocation problem and derived regularity properties of the solution. Our contribution provides a direction to benchmark mechanism proposals. References [1] J. F. Escobar, A. Jofr´e, Monopolistic competition in electricity networks with resistance losses, Economic theory 44 (1) (2010) 101 -- 121. [2] J. F. Escobar, A. Jofr´e, Equilibrium analysis of electricity auctions, Department of Economics Stanford University. [3] N. Figueroa, A. Jofr´e, B. Heymann, Cost-minimizing regulations for a wholesale electricity market. [4] R. B. Myerson, Optimal auction design, Mathematics of operations research 6 (1) (1981) 58 -- 73. [5] B. Heymann, A. Jofr´e, Mechanism design and auctions for electricity network (2016). [6] D. Aussel, R. Correa, M. Marechal, Electricity spot market with transmission losses, Management 9 (2) (2013) 275 -- 290. [7] E. J. Anderson, P. Holmberg, A. B. Philpott, Mixed strategies in discriminatory divisible-good auctions, The RAND Journal of Economics 44 (1) (2013) 1 -- 32. [8] X. Hu, D. Ralph, Using epecs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices, Operations research 55 (5) (2007) 809 -- 827. [9] E. Altman, T. Boulogne, R. El-Azouzi, T. Jim´enez, L. Wynter, A survey on networking games in telecommunications, Computers and Operations Research 33 (2) (2006) 286 -- 311. doi:10.1016/j. cor.2004.06.005. [10] M. Babaioff, E. Pavlov, N. Nisan, Mechanisms for a Spatially Distributed Market, Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) 66. [11] I.-K. Cho, Competitive Equilibrium in a Radial Network, The RAND Journal of Economics 34 (3) (2003) 438. doi:10.2307/1593740. [12] J.-J. Laffont, D. Martimort, The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model, Princeton univer- sity press, 2009. [13] V. Krishna, Auction theory, Academic press, 2009. [14] T. Roughgarden, Twenty lectures on algorithmic game theory, Cambridge University Press, 2016. [15] N. Nisan, Introduction to mechanism design (for computer scientists), Algorithmic game theory 209 (2007) 242. [16] R. J. Aumann, S. Hart, Handbook of game theory with economic applications, Vol. 2, Elsevier, 1992. 25 [17] D. M. Topkis, Supermodularity and complementarity, Princeton university press, 1998. [18] R. Gibbons, Game theory for applied economists, Princeton University Press, 1992. [19] J. R. Correa, N. Figueroa, On the planner's loss due to lack of information in bayesian mechanism design, in: Algorithmic Game Theory, Springer, 2009, pp. 72 -- 84. [20] R. Palma-Benhke, A. Philpott, A. Jofr´e, M. Cort´es-Carmona, Modelling network constrained eco- nomic dispatch problems, Optimization and Engineering 14 (3) (2013) 417 -- 430. doi:10.1007/ s11081-012-9203-5. [21] R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-b. Wets, Variational analysis. [22] R. T. Rockafellar, Lagrange Multipliers and Optimality, SIAM Review 35 (2) (1993) 183 -- 238. doi:10.1137/1035044. [23] C. Berge, Topological Spaces: including a treatment of multi-valued functions, vector spaces, and convexity, 1997. [24] M. Bagnoli, T. Bergstrom, Log-concave probability and its applications, Economic theory 26 (2) (2005) 445 -- 469. [25] J.-J. Laffont, J. Tirole, The dynamics of incentive contracts, Econometrica: Journal of the Econo- metric Society (1988) 1153 -- 1175. [26] M. Grant, S. Boyd, Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs, in: V. Blondel, S. Boyd, H. Kimura (Eds.), Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer-Verlag Limited, 2008, pp. 95 -- 110. [27] M. Grant, S. Boyd, CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1 (Mar. 2014). [28] A.-L. Barab´asi, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, science 286 (5439) (1999) 509 -- 512. [29] R. K. Sundaram, A first course in optimization theory, Cambridge university press, 1996. Appendix A. Proof of Lemma 5 Proof. By definition X(a1 . . . ak−1, b, ak+1 . . . aN ) − X(a1 . . . ak−1, c, ak+1 . . . aN ) = V (a1 . . . b . . . aN ) − V (a1 . . . c . . . aN ) + aj[Qj(a1 . . . b . . . aN ) − Qj(a1 . . . c . . . aN )] (cid:88) (cid:88) j(cid:54)=k (cid:90) c b = Qk(a1 . . . s . . . aN )ds + j(cid:54)=k +bQk(a1 . . . b . . . aN ) − cQk(a1 . . . c . . . aN ) aj[Qj(a1 . . . b . . . aN ) − Qj(a1 . . . c . . . aN )] +bQk(a1 . . . b . . . aN ) − cQk(a1 . . . c . . . aN ). 26 We use (H1) for the last equality. Then we apply a telescopic formula X(a) − X(b) = X(a1 . . . aN ) − X(b1, a2 . . . aN ) + X(b1, a2 . . . aN ) − X(b1, b2 . . . aN ) + . . . , aN ) − X(b1 . . . bN ) +X(b1 . . . bN 1 = Qk(b1 . . . s . . . aN )ds) + (cid:90) bk ak N(cid:88) ( k=1 bj[Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )] aj[Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )] akQk(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − bkQk(b1 . . . bk−1 . . . bk, ak+1 . . . aN ) (cid:88) (cid:88) j<k j>k k=1 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) k=1 k=1 + + j=1 j=1 k<j k>j (cid:88) (cid:88) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) {bj(cid:88) N(cid:88) aj(cid:88) k>j j=1 j=1 + + = Reordering the last three terms, we get bj[Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )] aj[Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )] ajQj(b1 . . . bj − 1, aj, aj+1 . . . aN ) − bjQj(b1 . . . bj−1 . . . bj, aj+1 . . . aN ) [Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )] +ajQj(b1 . . . bj−1, aj, aj+1 . . . aN ) − bjQj(b1 . . . bj−1 . . . bj, aj+1 . . . aN ) + [Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, ak, ak+1 . . . aN ) − Qj(b1 . . . bk−1, bk, ak+1 . . . aN )]} k<j = N(cid:88) ajQj(a1 . . . aN ) − bjQj(b1 . . . bN ) We end up with X(a) − X(b) = N(cid:88) (ajQj(a) − bjQj(b) + j=1 j (cid:90) bj aj Qj(b1 . . . bj−1, t, aj+1 . . . aN )dt) (A.1) 27 Appendix B. On S and the regularity of q Remember that the set S corresponds to the points of transition between the two possibilities defined by the first order condition (48): S = {c ∈ Cn, qi(c) = j ¯q and λi(c) = cj(cid:48) for some i ∈ I, j ∈ J, j(cid:48) ∈ {j, j + 1}}. (B.1) Our first goal is to show that S is a finite union of sets of zero measure (Lemmas 18 and 20). To do so, we apply the implicit functions theorem. From this we deduce the regularity of q (proof of Lemma 11). For any IA, IB partition of I, and IC ⊂ IB not empty, j ∈ J I and j(cid:48) ∈ J I such that for all i, j(cid:48) ∈ {ji, ji + 1}, we denote by S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) the setc ∈ Cn such that for any i ∈ I i ∈ IB ⇒ qi(c) = ji ¯q i ∈ IC ⇒ λi(c) = cj(cid:48) i ∈ IA ⇒ λi(c) = cj(cid:48) (cid:18) ∂Fi(λ(c)) (cid:19) i i ∂λj (i,j)∈IB . M (c) = For an element c of such set, we denote by M the matrix i and qi(c) /∈ N¯q i  . (B.2) (B.3) We need to study the invertibility of M to apply the implicit functions theorem (Lemma 19). Note that the function S is defined on a finite set. We use the image of S to show that the measure of S with respect to the Lebesgue measure is zero. We first show in the next lemma that S is included in the finite union of the S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) family. Then we will show that each element of this family has a measure equal to zero. Lemma 18. S ⊆ ∪S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) Proof. Take c ∈ S, then by definition of S, there exist i ∈ I, j ∈ J and j(cid:48) ∈ {j, j + 1} such that qi(c) = j ¯q and λi(c) = cj(cid:48), therefore IC is not empty. By Lemma 9, for all i ∈ I, i is in IA or IB. Hence we have a set S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) such that c is in this set, so S is included in the union of those sets. Lemma 19. For any c ∈ Cn the matrix M (c) is invertible. Proof. Assume that there are some coefficients αi such that (cid:80) i αiMi = 0 where Mi is the ith column of M . Then by (32) and (33), the ith row of this relation writes: (cid:88) αi j∈V (i) (cid:88) λ2 j ri,j(λi + λj)3 = αjλiλj ri,j(λi + λj)3 . j∈V (i),j∈IB We denote bi,j = λ2 j λi ri,j (λi+λj )3 and ai = αi λi . Then (B.4) is equivalent to (cid:88) bi,j(cid:80) aj k∈V (i) bi,k ai = j∈V (i),j∈IB 28 (B.4) (B.5) Insofar as we can slightly perturb the demand, we assume without loss of generality that t it is not possible to produce a multiple of ¯q at each node and satisfy exactly the nodal constraints ((cid:63)). Considering the biggest ai, we get that all ai are equal by convexity, thus either all are equal to zero or (cid:88) (cid:88) bi,j = bi,j (B.6) j∈V (i) j∈V (i),j∈IB which is not the case since IA is not empty by ((cid:63)). Next we show that S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) has a zero Lebesgue measure. Lemma 20. For any IA, IB partition of I, and IC ⊂ IB not empty, j ∈ J I and j(cid:48) ∈ J I such that for all i, j(cid:48) ∈ {j, j + 1}, the measure of the set S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) is zero. Proof. We assume in the market description that it is not possible to produce a multiple ¯q at each node and satisfy exactly the nodal constraints (((cid:63)). Therefore it is not possible that IB = I, therefore IA is not empty. By definition of SIA,IB ,IC ,j,j(cid:48), for all i ∈ IB, Fi(cj(cid:48) IA , λIB (c)) = qi(c) = ji ¯q, (B.7) which is a system of equations in λIB parametrized by cj(cid:48) . Let c ∈ C such that the system is satisfied, by Lemma 19, we can apply the implicit function theorem, hence there is a ball around c in which S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) is included in a smooth surface. By compacity of C, we can choose a sequence dense in S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)). We apply the result to each element of this sequence. By density, S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) is a countable union of smooth surfaces. Therefore the measure of S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) is zero. IA A direct consequence of Lemma 20 and Lemma 18 is Lemma 21. The measure of S is zero. We proceed with the proof of Lemma 11. of lemma 11. Let c = (c1 . . . cn) ∈ Cn\S. Let us show that q is infinitely differentiable at c. We consider the two assertions: Ai = "∃ki, Fi(λ(c)) ∈]ki − 1, ki[¯q Bi = "∃ki, Fi(λ(c)) = ki ¯q and λi = ck i " and λi ∈]ck i , ck+1 i [" By Lemma 9 and by defintion of S, for any i ∈ I either Ai or Bi is true, but never both. We denote by IA (resp. IB ) the set of elements of I for which Ai (resp. IB) is true. If Ai is true for all i then there is a neighborhood V of c such that for any element c of V , Fi(c) ∈]ki − 1, ki[¯q, therefore on V , λ(c) = c. Else IB is not empty and by definition of Bi ∀i ∈ IB Fi(λIA , λIB ) = ¯qji, (B.8) 29 which we can see as an equation in λIB parametrized by λIA . This equation is satisfied at λ(c). If we denote by M the matrix (cid:18) ∂Fi(λ(c)) (cid:19) M = ∂λj , (i,j)∈IB (B.9) then M is invertible (see lemma 19), the implicit function theorem applies and there exists a function λIB so that in a neighborhood V of c, for all i ∈ IB, we have Fi(λIA , λIB (λIA )) = ¯qki. Moreover, since Fi is C∞ on [c∗, c∗]n, λIB is C∞ on V . Then if c ∈ V , (c, λIB (c)) checks the first order condition thus by uniqueness cIA , λIB (c) is the dual solution, and so, qi = Fi(λIB (c), c) for all i ∈ I on V , so qi is C∞ at c. This concludes the proof of the first part of the lemma. The continuity of q comes from Berge maximum principle (see Theorem 9.17 in [29]) in a convex setting. The next lemma is an important component for the proof of Theorem 2. Lemma 22. Let i ∈ I and ci ∈ Ci, then the Lebesgue measure of the set Si(ci) = {c−i ∈ C−i, (ci, c−i) ∈ S} (B.10) is zero. Proof. Using Lemma 18, Si(ci) ⊆ {c−i ∈ C−i, (ci, c−i) ∈ ∪S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48))}. Now let c−i ∈ Si(ci), IA, IB a partition of I, and IC ⊆ IB not empty, and j, j(cid:48) such that (ci, c−i) ∈ S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)). There are three possible cases: • i ∈ IA then as explained in the proof of Lemma 20, S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) is locally a surface parametrized by ci so by projection over an hyperplane of the type ci = x it also a surface in C−i. • i ∈ IB\IC locally, q is independant of ci therefore if S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) ∩ (ci,Si(ci)) is of strictly positive measure, then S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) has also a strictly positive measure in Cn, since this is not true, S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) ∩ (ci,Si(ci)) is of zero measure in the neighborhood. • Else i ∈ IC, which is the tricky part. First by definition of IC, for any element c of S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)), qi(c) = ji ¯q and λi(c) = cj(cid:48) i . Without loss of generality, we assume j(cid:48) i = ji, the other case can be treated similarly. Then we make the observation that we do not modify the c−i of S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) if we set cj+1 i = cj i . Since we are interested in S(IA, IB, IC, j, j(cid:48)) ∩ (ci,Si(ci)), we can assume without i . Then we have reduced to the case i ∈ IA. loss of generality that cj+1 i = cj i We conclude as in the proof of Lemma 20. 30
1812.10293	1	1812	2018-12-26T12:24:51	Cartel Stability under Quality Differentiation	[ "econ.TH" ]	This note considers cartel stability when the cartelized products are vertically differentiated. If market shares are maintained at pre-collusive levels, then the firm with the lowest competitive price-cost margin has the strongest incentive to deviate from the collusive agreement. The lowest-quality supplier has the tightest incentive constraint when the difference in unit production costs is sufficiently small.	econ.TH	econ	CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI Abstract. This note considers cartel stability when the cartelized products are vertically differentiated. If market shares are maintained at pre-collusive levels, then the firm with the lowest competitive price-cost margin has the strongest incentive to deviate from the collusive agreement. The lowest-quality supplier has the tightest incentive constraint when the difference in unit production costs is sufficiently small. Keywords: Cartel Stability, Collusion, Vertical Differentiation. JEL Classification: D43, L13, L41. 1. Introduction In this note, we examine cartel stability when the cartelized products are vertically dif- ferentiated. Goods or services are differentiated vertically when there is consensus among consumers about how to rank them quality-wise; comparing products A and B, all agree A to have a higher (perceived) value than B or vice versa. There might, however, still be a demand for lower-quality goods when buyers face budget constraints or differ in their will- ingness to pay for quality. This creates an incentive for suppliers to compete through offering different price-quality combinations. One implication of this price-quality dispersion is that firms that consider colluding typ- ically face heterogeneous incentive constraints. The fact that firms are induced to charge different prices, for example, affects both collusive and noncollusive profits. From a supply- side perspective, there commonly exists a positive relationship between the quality of a good and its production costs. This, too, impacts both sides of the constraint. It is therefore a priori unclear how quality differentiation impacts the sustainability of collusion. The scarce literature on this topic provides mixed results and, moreover, does not con- sider the potential impact of cost heterogeneity.1 Assuming identical costs, Hackner (1994) and Symeonidis (1999) both analyze an infinitely repeated vertically differentiated duopoly game.2 Hackner (1994) studies a variation of the setting in Gabszewicz and Thisse (1979) Date: October 2018. We appreciate the comments of Maria Rosa Battaggion, Boris Ginzburg, Joseph E. Harrington Jr., Ronald Peeters, an anonymous referee, participants at the 2018 Oligo Workshop and the 2018 EARIE conference in Athens. All opinions and errors are ours alone. Iwan Bos, Department of Organization & Strategy, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University. E-mail: [email protected]. Marco A. Marini, Department of Social and Economic Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza. E-mail: [email protected]. 1An extensive and detailed overview of this literature is provided by Marini (2018). 2Apart from being analytically convenient, the identical cost assumption can be defended on the grounds that the difference in quality may mainly come from upfront sunk investments in which case the impact on prices would be limited. 1 2 IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI and Shaked and Sutton (1982) and finds that it is the high-quality supplier who has the strongest incentive to deviate. By contrast, Symeonidis (1999) considers a representative consumer model with horizontal and vertical product differentiation and establishes that it is the low-quality seller who is most eager to leave the cartel. In the following, we analyze an n-firm infinitely repeated game version of the classic vertical differentiation model of Mussa and Rosen (1978) where production costs are assumed to be increasing in quality.3 Under the assumption that colluding firms maintain their pre-collusive market shares, we find that it is the competitive mark-up rather than the quality of the product that drives the incentive to deviate. Specifically, it is the supplier with the lowest noncooperative price-cost margin who has the strongest incentive to chisel on the cartel. Moreover, our analysis confirms the above-mentioned conclusion by Symeonidis (1999) when the difference in unit costs is sufficiently small. The next section presents the model. Section 3 contains the main finding. Section 4 concludes. 2. Model There is a given set of suppliers, denoted N = {1, . . . , n}, who repeatedly interact over an infinite, discrete time horizon. In every period t ∈ N, they simultaneously make price decisions with the aim to maximize the expected discounted sum of their profit stream. Firms face a common discount factor δ ∈ (0, 1) and all prices set up until t − 1 are assumed public knowledge. Each firm i ∈ N sells a single variant of the product with quality vi. We assume ∞ > vn > vn−1 > ... > v1 > 0 and refer to firm n as the top firm, firm 1 as the bottom firm and all others as intermediate firms. Unit production costs of firm i ∈ N are given by the constant ci and we suppose these costs to be positive and (weakly) increasing in quality, i.e., cn ≥ cn−1 ≥ . . . ≥ c1 > 0. Consumers have a valuation for the various product types of θ, which is uniformly dis- tributed on [θ, θ] ⊂ R++ with mass normalized to one. A higher θ corresponds to a higher gross utility when consuming variant vi. Buyers purchase no more than one item so that someone 'located' at θ obtains the following utility (2.1) U(θ) =(cid:26) θvi − pi when buying from firm i 0 when not buying, where pi ∈(cid:2)0, θvn(cid:3) is the price set by firm i.4 Using (2.1), it can be easily verified that a consumer at θi ∈ [θ, θ] is indifferent between buying from, say, firm i + 1 and firm i when (2.2) θi(pi, pi+1) = pi+1 − pi vi+1 − vi , for every i = 1, 2, ..., n − 1. In the ensuing analysis, we further assume that the market is and remains covered (i.e., all consumers buy a product).5 3Like the model in Hackner (1994), this is a model with heterogeneous customers. Apart from the number of firms and cost heterogeneity, it differs in terms of consumers' utility specification. 4Note that none of the buyers would buy at prices in excess of θvn. 5This is a common assumption in contributions that employ this type of spatial setting. See, for example, Tirole (1988, pp.296-298) and Ecchia and Lambertini (1997). We discuss some implications of this assumption CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 3 Current profit of the bottom firm (i = 1) is therefore given by (2.3) π1 (p1, p2) = (p1 − c1) · (θ1 − θ) , where θ1 = θ1(p1, p2) is as specified by (2.2). For each intermediate firm (i = 2, 3, ..., n − 1) profit is (2.4) πi (pi−1, pi, pi+1) = (pi − ci) · (θi − θi−1) , and for the top firm (i = n) it is πn (pn−1, pn) = (pn − cn) ·(cid:0)θ − θn−1(cid:1) . Before analyzing the infinitely repeated version of the above game, let us first consider the one-shot case in more detail. In this setting, each firm simultaneously picks a price to maximize its profit as specified in (2.3)-(2.5). Following the first-order conditions, this yields three types of best-response functions: for the bottom firm (i = 1). For each intermediate firm (i = 2, 3, ..., n − 1), the best-reply is given by 1 2 (p2 + c1 − θ(v2 − v1)) bp1(p2) = The best-response function of the top firm (i = n) is 1 2 bpi(pi−1, pi+1) = bpn(pn−1) = pi−1(vi+1 − vi) + pi+1(vi − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi−1) + 1 2 ci. 1 2(cid:0)pn−1 + cn + θ(vn − vn−1)(cid:1) . Since the action sets are compact and convex and the above best-reply functions are con- tractions, there exists a unique static Nash equilibrium price vector p∗ for any finite number of firms.6 Finally, we impose two more conditions to ensure that the equilibrium solution is interior (i.e., all firms have a positive output at p∗) and that the market is indeed covered at the single-shot Nash equilibrium: (2.9) θ > θ∗ n−1 > θ ∗ n−2 > . . . > θ∗ i > ... > θ∗ 1 > θ > where θ∗ i ≡ θi(cid:0)p∗ i , p∗ i+1(cid:1) and p∗ i ≥ ci, for all i ∈ N. p∗ 1 v1 > 0, at the end of Section 3 and consider the possibility of an uncovered collusive market in an online appendix to this paper. 6See, for instance, Friedman (1991, p.84). A sufficient condition for the contraction property to hold is (see, for example, Vives 2000, p.47): (2.5) (2.6) (2.7) (2.8) which, using (2.4) for all intermediate firms i = 2, ..., n − 1, becomes which holds. The same applies for the top and the bottom firm. ∂ 2πi ∂ (pi)2 +Pj6=i(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ∂ 2πi ∂pi∂pj(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) < 0, vi−1 − vi+1 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) < 0, 4 IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI 3. Sustainability of Collusion Within the above framework, we now study the sustainability of collusion assuming a standard grim-trigger punishment strategy. The incentive compatibility constraint (ICC) of a firm i ∈ N is then given by: Ωi ≡ πc i − (1 − δ) · πd i − δ · π∗ i ≥ 0, (3.1) where πc i−1, pc bpi(pc i = πi(cid:0)pc i−1, pc i , pc i+1), is its deviation payoff and π ∗ i+1(cid:1) is its collusive payoff, πd i−1, p∗ i , p∗ i = πi(cid:0)p∗ i , pc i−1, pd i = πi(cid:0)pc i+1(cid:1), with pd i+1(cid:1) is its Nash equilibrium payoff. i = A cartel comprising the entire industry is thus sustainable only when Ωi ≥ 0 for all i ∈ N. In principle, this set-up allows for a plethora of sustainable collusive contracts. In the fol- lowing, we limit ourselves to what is perhaps the simplest possible agreement. Specifically, we consider the maximization of total cartel profits without side payments under the as- sumption that firms maintain their market shares at pre-collusive levels. Such an agreement is appealing for several reasons. First, it seems a natural focal point in the issue of how to divide the market. Second, there have been quite a few cartels that employed such (or similar) market-sharing scheme.7 Third, it is arguably one of the most subtle arrangements in that firm behavior maintains a competitive appearance, thereby minimizing the possibility of cartel detection. Let us now address the question of what collusive price vector such an all-inclusive cartel would pick. As an initial observation, notice that the fixed market share assumption implies that the price ranking should stay the same (i.e., collusive prices are strictly increasing in quality). Moreover, as market size is given, the lowest-valuation buyer should still be willing to buy the product. This means that θv1 − pc 1 ≥ 0. Next, note that the fixed market share rule in combination with the covered market assumption implies that each 'marginal consumer's location' remains unaffected. Specifically, the consumer who was indifferent between firm 1 and 2 absent collusion has now the following utility when buying from firm 1: which in turn determines the collusive price for the product of firm 2: U(θ∗ 2 − p∗ 1 1) =(cid:18) p∗ (cid:18) p∗ v2 − v1(cid:19) v1 − pc v2 − v1(cid:19) v1 − pc 1 =(cid:18) p∗ 2 − p∗ 1 2 − p∗ 1 v2 − v1(cid:19) v2 − pc 1, 2. Rearranging gives, pc 2 = p∗ 2 + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . A higher collusive price by firm 2 would mean that the customer on the boundary prefers firm 1, which contradicts market shares being fixed. Likewise, a lower price implies a decrease in sales for firm 1 and therefore cannot occur either. The collusive prices for all other firms 7See, for example, Harrington (2006). CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 5 can be determined in a similar fashion. In general, the collusive price of firm i ∈ N\{1} is equal to its Nash price plus the price increase by the lowest-quality firm: (3.2) pc i = p∗ i + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . Both cartel profits and the incentive constraints are therefore effectively a function of pc 1 alone. Since prices are strategic complements, it is clear that the cartel would like to set pc 1 = θv1. The collusive contract with pc 1 = θv1 might not be sustainable, however, because one or more ICC's may be binding. The next result shows that it is the supplier with the lowest noncollusive profit margin who has the tightest incentive constraint. Proposition 1. For any i, j ∈ N and j 6= i, if p∗ i − ci > p∗ j − cj, then Ωi > Ωj. Proof. Consider the ICC of an intermediate firm i = 2, 3, ..., n − 1: πd i − πc i πd i − π ∗ i i ≥ 0 ⇔ δ ≥ δi ≡ i − (1 − δ) · πd i − δ · π∗ Ωi ≡ πc . To evaluate the critical discount factor δi of every intermediate firm, let us focus on i , π ∗ i = in turn. Every firm's i = 2, 3, ..., n − 1 deviating profit is given by πd i and πc i πd (cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1)(cid:0)θd i − θd i−1(cid:1), which, using best-replies (2.7), yields pc i−1(vi+1 − vi) + pc pd i − ci = i+1(vi − vi−1) − (vi+1 − vi−1)ci 2(vi+1 − vi−1) or (3.3) 2(vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1) = pc i−1(vi+1 − vi) + pc i+1(vi − vi−1) − (vi+1 − vi−1)ci. Moreover, from which i − θd θd i−1 = (vi − vi−1) pc i+1 + (vi+1 − vi) pc i−1 − (vi+1 − vi−1) ci 2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) , i−1 − (vi+1 − vi−1) ci. (3.4) 2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:0)θd Combining (3.3)-(3.4) yields i − θd i+1 + (vi+1 − vi) pc i−1(cid:1) = (vi − vi−1) pc i − ci(cid:1) = 2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:0)θd 2(vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:0)pd (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1) . i−1(cid:1) = (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) . i − ci(cid:1)2(cid:18) i =(cid:0)pd (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi−1) (cid:0)θd i − θd πd i − θd i−1(cid:1) In a similar vein, intermediate firms' Nash profit can be written as and therefore (3.5) Hence, deviating profits can be written as 6 (3.6) IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI π ∗ i = (p∗ i − ci)2(cid:18) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) . Following the covered market assumption, we know that θc i − θc i−1 = θ∗ i − θ∗ i−1 and Hence, every intermediate firm's collusive profit can be written as pc i = p∗ i + pc 1 − p∗ 1. (3.7) πc i = (pc i − ci)(cid:0)θc i − θc i−1(cid:1) = (p∗ i + pc 1 − p∗ 1 − ci)(cid:18) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (p∗ i − ci)(cid:19) . Note further that (vi − vi−1) pc i+1 + (vi+1 − vi) pc i−1 + (vi+1 − vi−1) ci 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) i+1 + pc 1 − p∗ 1(cid:1) + (vi+1 − vi)(cid:0)p∗ 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) i−1 + pc 1 − p∗ 1(cid:1) + (vi+1 − vi−1) ci pd i = = (vi − vi−1)(cid:0)p∗ = p∗ i + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . 1 2 Combining (3.5)-(3.7) yields (3.8) and (3.9) i − πc πd (vi+1 − vi−1) i =(cid:18) (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) (pc (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:20) 1 1)(cid:20) 1 (vi+1 − vi−1) 1 − p∗ 4 4 πd i − π ∗ i =(cid:18) (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2(cid:21) , (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ i − ci)(cid:21) . Thus, by (5.1) and (5.2), the critical discount factor of every intermediate firm i = 2, 3, ..., n− 1 is given by 1) 1 − p∗ i − ci) 1) + (p∗ which is decreasing in the noncollusive price-cost margin. Turning to the top-quality firm, by following the above steps, it can be verified that πd i − πc i πd i − π ∗ i 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1 4 (pc δi ≡ = , 1 n = (cid:0)pd n − cn(cid:1)2 (vn − vn−1) πd , π ∗ n = n − cn)2 (p∗ (vn − vn−1) and πc n = (pc 1 − p∗ 1 + p∗ n − cn) θ (vn − vn−1) −(cid:0)p∗ vn − vn−1 n − p∗ n−1(cid:1) ! , yielding δn ≡ n − πc πd n πd n − π ∗ n = 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ n − cn) 1 4 (pc . CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 7 Hence, it is the supplier with the smaller noncooperative price-cost margin (between firm n and firm n − 1) who has the tighter incentive constraint. Finally, in a similar fashion, it can be shown that , π ∗ 1 = 1 − c1)2 (p∗ (v2 − v1) and 1 = (cid:0)pd πd 1 = (pc πc (v2 − v1) 1 − c1(cid:1)2 1 − c1)(cid:18) pc 2 − pc 1 − (v2 − v1) θ v2 − v1 (cid:19) = (pc 1 − c1) (p∗ (v2 − v1) 1 − c1) , yielding δ1 ≡ 1 − πc πd 1 πd 1 − π ∗ 1 = 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) 1 − p∗ 1 − c1) 1) + (p∗ 1 4 (pc . Hence, p∗ 2 − c2 > p∗ 1 − c1 implies Ω2 > Ω1, whereas p∗ 1 − c1 > p∗ thus conclude that, if p∗ i − ci > p∗ j − cj, then Ωi > Ωj for all i, j ∈ N, j 6= i. 2 − c2 implies Ω1 > Ω2. We (cid:3) i − πc gain of defection(cid:0)πd i − π ∗ i(cid:1) and the severity of the resulting punishment (πd The incentive to deviate from the collusive agreement is determined by the short-term i + πc i ). The proof of Proposition 1 reveals that the 'extra profit effect' is the same across firms and that the heterogeneity in incentive constraints is exclusively driven by differences in the punishment impact (πc i ). Specifically, there is a positive relation between a firm's market share and its noncollusive price-cost margin. Since market shares are fixed at pre- collusive levels, members with a higher competitive mark-up are hit relatively harder by a cartel breakdown and this creates a stronger incentive to abide by the agreement. i = πd i − πc i − π ∗ i − π ∗ The next result follows immediately. In stating this result, let △cij = ci − cj for any firm i, j ∈ N and j 6= i. Corollary 1. For any firm i, j ∈ N and j 6= i, ∃µ ∈ R++ such that if △cij < µ and vi > vj, then Ωi > Ωj. Hence, if the difference in unit production costs is sufficiently small, then it is the lowest- quality supplier who has the tightest incentive constraint. Our analysis thus confirms the above-mentioned conclusion by Symeonidis (1999) in case quality heterogeneity is primarily driven by (sunk) fixed costs rather than variable costs.8 Let us conclude this section with a remark on the covered market assumption. Note that since each ICC is strictly concave in the own cartel price, a sufficient condition for the cartel to keep market size constant is that at pc < 0 for all i ∈ N. Endogenizing the size of the market would therefore not affect the above findings when the discount factor is sufficiently low. If its members are patient enough, however, then the cartel would like to uncover the market. This case is generally far less tractable analytically, but we show in an online appendix that this paper's results also hold when the number of low-valuation buyers leaving the market is sufficiently small. 1 = θv1, Ωi ≤ 0 and ∂Ωi ∂pc i 8This result can also be shown to hold in an n-firm variation of the model in Hackner (1994). The analysis is available upon request. 8 IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI 4. Conclusion Many markets are characterized by some degree of quality differentiation with correspond- ing firm heterogeneity in cost and demand. One implication of such differences is that collud- ing firms typically face non-identical incentive constraints. Existing literature on this topic focuses on demand differences, while ignoring the potential impact of cost heterogeneity. In this note, we considered how cartel stability is affected when unit costs are increasing in product quality. Under the assumption that colluding firms maintain their pre-collusive mar- ket shares, we found that the incentive to deviate from the collusive agreement is monotonic in the noncollusive price-cost margin. Specifically, the supplier with the lowest competitive mark-up is ceteris paribus most inclined to leave the cartel. Moreover, it is the lowest-quality seller who has the tightest incentive constraint when differences in unit costs are sufficiently small. 5. Appendix 1: Uncovered Market Case In the note we show that the incentive to deviate from a cartel agreement is monotonic in the noncollusive price-cost margin and that the firm with the lowest profit margin has the tightest incentive constraint (Proposition 1). This result is derived under the assumption of a fixed market size. In this appendix, we consider the possibility that the cartel 'uncovers the market' by setting collusive prices at a level where some of the lowest-valuation customers prefer to no longer buy the product. In the following, we show that the result of Proposition 1 also holds when the number of buyers leaving the market is sufficiently small. To begin, consider the incentive compatibility constraint (ICC) of an intermediate firm i ∈ N: Ωi ≡ (pc i − ci)(cid:0)θc i − θc i−1(cid:1) − (1 − δ)(cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1)(cid:0)θd As the cartel uses a fixed market share rule, it holds that: i−1(cid:1) − δ (p∗ i − ci)(cid:0)θ ∗ i − θd i − θ∗ i−1(cid:1) ≥ 0. The ICC can thus be written as: i−1 i − θc θc θ − pc 1 v1 = i − θ∗ θ∗ θ − θ i−1 . i − ci)(cid:0)θ∗ i − θ∗ Ωi ≡ (pc which is equivalent to δ ≥ δi ≡ Let us now specify πd i and πc Nash profits are respectively given by i . Following the proof of Proposition 1, deviating and i − θ∗ i−1(cid:1) ≥ 0, 1 i − θd i−1(cid:1)(cid:16)θ − pc v1(cid:17) (cid:0)θ − θ(cid:1) −(1 − δ)(cid:0)pd = (cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1)(cid:0)θd i − ci(cid:1)(cid:0)θd (cid:0)pd i − ci(cid:1)2(cid:18) i =(cid:0)pd i , π ∗ i−1(cid:1)−δ (p∗ i − ci(cid:1)(cid:0)θd i−1(cid:1) − (pc i−1(cid:1) − (p∗ i − ci)(cid:0)θ∗ i − ci)(cid:0)θ∗ (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) , (vi+1 − vi−1) i − θd i − θd i − θ ∗ πd πd i − πc i πd i − π ∗ i i − ci)(cid:0)θ∗ v1(cid:19) i−1(cid:1) (cid:18)θ− i−1(cid:1) (θ−θ) pc 1 i − θ∗ . CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 9 and π ∗ i = (p∗ i − ci)2(cid:18) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) . As to collusive profits, note that uncovering the market in combination with the fixed market share rule implies that the lowest quality firm has the smallest price increase and that the price increase is rising in quality. In other words, cartel prices must be chosen such that each marginal consumer's location 'shifts upwards' in order to maintain market shares at pre-collusive levels. Rather than adding pc i (as in the covered market case), intermediate firm i should therefore raise its price by more. Let this additional amount be indicated by xi > 0 so that its collusive price is given by pc 1 + xi. Collusive profits are then 1 to its Nash price p∗ i = p∗ i + pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ Focusing on the numerator of the critical discount factor first, we have πc i = (pc 1 − p∗ i − θc i + pc i − ci)(cid:0)θc i = (cid:0)pd = (cid:18) i−1(cid:1) = (p∗ i − ci(cid:1)2 (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:0)pd (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi−1) − (p∗ In this case, the deviating price is given by πd i − πc 1 + xi − ci)(cid:18)(vi+1 − vi−1) (p∗ v1(cid:17) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:16)θ − pc (cid:0)θ − θ(cid:1) . i − ci) 1 i + pc 1 − p∗ i − ci(cid:1)2 − 1 + xi − ci)(cid:18)(p∗ (p∗ i + pc 1 − p∗ 1 i − ci) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:16)θ − pc v1(cid:17) (cid:0)θ − θ(cid:1) v1(cid:17) i − ci)(cid:16)θ − pc  . (cid:0)θ − θ(cid:1) 1 + xi − ci) (p∗ 1 pd i = = (vi − vi−1) pc i+1 + (vi+1 − vi) pc i−1 + (vi+1 − vi−1) ci (vi − vi−1)(cid:0)p∗ i+1 + pc 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) 1 − p∗ 1 + xi+1(cid:1) + (vi+1 − vi)(cid:0)p∗ 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi − vi−1) xi+1 + (vi+1 − vi) xi−1 = p∗ i + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + 1 2 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) . i−1 + pc 1 − p∗ 1 + xi−1(cid:1) + (vi+1 − vi−1) ci To facilitate the presentation of the analysis, let us denote yi = (vi − vi−1) xi+1 + (vi+1 − vi) xi−1 2 (vi+1 − vi−1) and s = θ − pc 1 v1 θ − θ . Substituting in the above equation gives πd i − πc i = (cid:18) = (cid:18) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:20) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:20) 1 (vi+1 − vi−1) − (p∗ (cid:0)p∗ i + 1 i + pc 1 − p∗ 1 + xi − ci) (p∗ 1) + yi − ci(cid:1)2 i − ci) s (cid:21) 2 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + (1 − s) (p∗ + (p∗ 4 (pc 1 − p∗ i − ci) [(p∗ i − ci) + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + xi] i − ci) (2yi − xi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) (cid:21) or (5.1) πd i − πc i =(cid:18) (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19)(cid:20) 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + z(cid:21) , 10 where IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI z ≡ (1 − s) (p∗ i − ci) [(p∗ i − ci) + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + xi] + (p∗ i − ci) (2yi − xi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) . Note that with a covered market it holds that s = 1, xi = 0 and yi = 0, in which case z = 0 and the numerator reduces to the corresponding value in the proof of Proposition 1. Turning to the denominator of the critical discount factor, we have πd i − π ∗ i = (cid:0)pd = = = or (5.2) where (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) − (p∗ i − ci)2 (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) i − ci(cid:1)2 − (p∗ (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) i − ci)2i 1) + yi − ci(cid:1)2 − (p∗ i − ci)2i 2 (pc 1 − p∗ i + 1 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) i − ci(cid:1)2 (vi+1 − vi−1)h(cid:0)pd (vi+1 − vi−1)h(cid:0)p∗ (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:2) 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + (p∗ i − ci) (pc 1 − p∗ 1 + 2yi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) 1) + yi)(cid:3) πd i − π ∗ i = (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:2) 1 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + r(cid:3) , r ≡ (p∗ 1 − p∗ Note that in case of a covered market yi = 0 so that r = (pc of Proposition 1. Combining both terms (5.1) and (5.2) gives the critical discount factor: i − ci) as in the proof 1) + yi) . 1 + 2yi) + yi ((pc i − ci) (pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) (p∗ δ ≥ δi ≡ 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + (1 − s) (p∗ + (p∗ 1)2 + (p∗ i − ci) (pc 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ i − ci) [(p∗ i − ci) + (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + xi] i − ci) (2yi − xi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) 1 − p∗ 1 + 2yi) + yi · ((pc 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) . As a final step, let us evaluate this critical discount factor with respect to the price-cost margin (p∗ i − ci). Taking the first-derivative with respect to the noncollusive profit margin of firm i yields: ∂δi i − ci)) ∂ ((p∗ (cid:27)(cid:20) (1 − s) [2 (p∗ i − ci) + (pc + (2yi − xi) 1 − p∗ 1) + xi] (cid:21) 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1 + 2yi) = (cid:26) 1 −(cid:26) 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) 1 − p∗ i − ci) (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + (p∗ +yi ((pc 1)2 + (p∗ 4 (pc 1)2 + (1 − s) (p∗ + (p∗ 4 (pc 1)2 + (p∗ 1 − p∗ (cid:0) 1 (cid:0) 1 i − ci) (pc i − ci) [(p∗ 1 − p∗ i − ci) + (pc 1 + 2yi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + xi] i − ci) (2yi − xi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ i − ci) (pc 1) + yi) 1 − p∗ 1 + 2yi) + yi ((pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + yi)(cid:1)2 (cid:27) (pc 1) + yi)(cid:1)2 1 + 2yi) , CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 11 which is negative when (1 − s) (p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) + (p∗ i − ci) (pc 1 − p∗ 1 + 2yi) + −s {(pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + yi) + 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2(cid:21) < 0. i − ci)(cid:26)2yi ((pc 1) + xi}(cid:20)yi ((pc 1 2 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2(cid:27) Note that this condition holds for s → 1. In a similar fashion, this can be shown to be true for the bottom and top quality firm cases. Thus, we conclude that the result of Proposition 1 also holds when the cartel uncovers the market and the fraction of buyers no longer buying the product is sufficiently small. 6. Appendix 2: Example with Nonuniform Distribution Let us present a simple two-firm example with a non-uniform distribution of θ. The results of the paper are also shown to hold in this case. Though of course far from being a proof, this suggests that our findings may apply for a wider class of customer distributions. Consider the model of the paper, but with two firms and a simple 'two-step uniform' distribution function where a subset of consumers (of mass s) is uniformly distributed over a given intervalhθ,eθi, witheθ ∈(cid:0)θ, θ(cid:1) and another subset (of mass (1 − s) 6= s) is uniformly distributed over (cid:16)eθ, θi (higher willingness to pay consumers). The density function takes the form: In the following, suppose that θ1(p1, p2) = p2−p1 v2−v1 by: s 1−s (eθ−θ) (θ−eθ) for θ ∈hθ,eθi and for θ ∈(cid:16)eθ, θi . ≤eθ so that the profit functions are given f (θ) = − θ(cid:19) π1 = (p1 − c1)(cid:18) p2 − p1 (eθ − θ) v2 − v1(cid:19) π2 = (p2 − c2)(cid:18)eθ − + (p2 − c2)(cid:16)θ −eθ(cid:17) 1 − s (eθ − θ) (θ −eθ) = (p2 − c2) eθ (v2 − v1) s − sp2 + sp1 + (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (1 − s) (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) ! . p2 − p1 v2 − v1 , and s s The first-order conditions give the best response functions: 1 2 (p2 − (v2 − v1) θ + c1) (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ(1 − s)(cid:17) + sp1 + sc2 2s bp1 = bp2 = 12 IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI Combining gives the Nash prices and corresponding profits: 1 = p∗ 2 = p∗ (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ (1 + s)(cid:17) + 2sc1 + sc2 (v2 − v1)(cid:16)2(cid:16)eθ − θ(cid:17) + θs(cid:17) + 2sc2 + sc1 3s 3s π ∗ = 3s 1 =  2 =  1 − c1)2 (p∗ (v2 − v1) (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ (1 + s)(cid:17) − sc1 + sc2  (v2 − v1)(cid:16)2(cid:16)eθ − θ(cid:17) + θs(cid:17) − sc2 + sc1  (eθ − θ) 3s s . π ∗ 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ (1 + s)(cid:17) − sc1 + sc2  (v2 − v1)h2(cid:16)eθ − θ(cid:17) + θsi − sc2 + sc1 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ)  = 2 − c2)2 (p∗ (v2 − v1) s . (eθ − θ) pc 1 Under collusion, prices and profits are respectively given by: and πc 1 = (pc = (pc πc 2 = (pc = (pc = (pc = (pc 1 s s 3s (pc = (pc 1 − c1) 1 − p∗ 1) = 2 + (pc pc 2 = p∗ 2 − p∗ 1 v2 − v1 2 − pc 1 v2 − v1 − θ(cid:19) − θ(cid:19) 1 − c1) (p∗ (v2 − v1) 1 − c1)(cid:18) p∗ (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ (1 + s)(cid:17) + sc2 − sc1  = (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ + 2θs(cid:17) + sc2 − sc1 + 3spc (eθ − θ) (eθ − θ) 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) 3eθ (v2 − v1) s − (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ + 2θs(cid:17) − sc2 + sc1 + 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (1 − s) (v2 − v1)h2(cid:16)eθ − θ(cid:17) + θsi − sc2 + sc1 1) + (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (1 − s) 1) + (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (1 − s) 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ)  = 1 − c1)(cid:18) pc 1 − c1) 2 − c2) eθ (v2 − v1) s − s (pc 2 − c2) eθ (v2 − v1) s − s (p∗ 2 − c2) 2 − c2) 2 − c2) (p∗ (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) ! ! 2 − c2) 2 − pc 2 − p∗ s . (pc 3 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) s . (eθ − θ)  CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 13 Finally, deviating price and profits are: pd 1 = pd 2 = 1 2 (pc 2 − (v2 − v1) θ + c1) (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ(1 − s)(cid:17) + spc 2s 1 + sc2 = πd 1 = (cid:0)pd (pc s 2 − pd 1 v2 − v1 − θ(cid:19) 1 − c1(cid:1)(cid:18) pc (eθ − θ) 2 − (v2 − v1) θ − c1)(cid:18) pc 1 − c1(cid:1)2 s , = 1 2 = (cid:0)pd 2 − (v2 − v1) θ − c1 2 (v2 − v1) (cid:19) s (eθ − θ) and and, πd (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) 2 − c2(cid:1) eθ (v2 − v1) s − s(cid:0)pd (v2 − v1)(cid:16)eθ − θ(1 − s)(cid:17) + spc 2 − c2(cid:1)2 2s s . (v2 − v1) 2 = (cid:0)pd =  = (cid:0)pd (eθ − θ) = (cid:0)pd δ1 = 1 − πc πd 1 πd 1 − π ∗ 1 ! 2 − pc 1(cid:1) + (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) (1 − s) (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ)  (v2 − v1)heθ − θ (1 − s)i + spc 2 (v2 − v1) (eθ − θ) 1 − sc2 1 − sc2  Combining to obtain the critical discount factor of each firm gives: (v2 − v1) s − 1 − c1(cid:1)2 (eθ − θ) (cid:0)pd 1 − c1(cid:1)2 (eθ − θ) (v2 − v1) s 1 − c1) 1 − c1) (p∗ 1 − c1)2 − (p∗ = (pc 1 − c1) (p∗ (v2 − v1) 1 − c1)2 (p∗ (v2 − v1) − 1 − c1) s s (eθ − θ) (eθ − θ) 1 − p∗ (pc (pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1 4 4 (pc 1)(cid:0) 1 1)2 1) + (p∗ 1 − c1)(cid:1) = (cid:0)pd − (pc 1 − c1(cid:1)2 (cid:0)pd 1 − c1(cid:1)2 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) 1 4 = 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ 1 − c1) . IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI 14 and δ2 = πd 2 − πc 2 πd 2 − π ∗ 2 s − (v2 − v1) = (cid:0)pd 2 − c2(cid:1)2 (eθ − θ) (cid:0)pd 2 − c2(cid:1)2 (eθ − θ) 2 − c2(cid:1)2 − (pc (cid:0)pd 2 − c2(cid:1)2 − (p∗ 2 − c2) (p∗ 2 − c2)2 (v2 − v1) 2 − c2) s = 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . (pc 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ 2 − c2) = (cid:0)pd = 1 4 (pc 2 − c2) (p∗ (v2 − v1) 2 − c2)2 (p∗ (v2 − v1) − 2 − c2) s s (eθ − θ) (eθ − θ) 1 − p∗ (pc (pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1 4 4 (pc 1)(cid:0) 1 1)2 1) + (p∗ 2 − c2)(cid:1) 7. Appendix 3: Comparisons with Other Models Symeonidis (1999) analyzes a representative consumer model, which differs from ours in many ways. Meaningful comparisons are therefore difficult to make. Hackner's (1994) model is also different, but in many ways comparable. Specifically, he is using a utility specification of the form U (θ) = vi (θ − pi), whereas we follow Mussa and Rosen (1978) which uses U (θ) = viθ − pi. To address this issue, we have tried to clarify the differences between the different settings in the introduction. Moreover, we have performed the same analysis in Hackner's (1994) setting. This analysis is presented below, but let us first summarize the main conclusion. The main finding of Proposition 1 may not generally hold in Hackner's (1994) model. In particular, conclusions may be different when the highest quality firms have the lowest profit margins and vice versa. Yet, the results of Proposition 1 do hold when the noncollusive profit margin is increasing in quality. Moreover, if differences in unit costs are sufficiently small, then it is indeed the lowest-quality seller who is most inclined to deviate, all else unchanged. Consequently, the result of the Corollary also holds when taking Hackner's (1994) approach. We have added a footnote highlighting this point (footnote 8). Consider an intermediate firm in an n-firm variant of Hackner's (1994) model with cost heterogeneity. A consumer located at θi is indifferent between buying from firm i and i + 1 when: θivi+1 − vi+1pi+1 = θivi − vipi or θi = vi+1pi+1 − vipi vi+1 − vi . The profit function is then given by πi = (pi − ci)(cid:18) vi+1 (vi − vi−1) pi+1 + vi−1 (vi+1 − vi) pi−1 − vi (vi+1 − vi−1) pi (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (cid:19) , which yields the following best-response function: vi+1 (vi − vi−1) pi+1 + vi−1 (vi+1 − vi) pi−1 + vi (vi+1 − vi−1) ci 2vi (vi+1 − vi−1) . bpi (pi−1, pi+1) = In a similar fashion, it can be shown that: i − ci)2(cid:18) i − ci(cid:1)2(cid:18) vi (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) . (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1)(cid:19) . vi (vi+1 − vi−1) π ∗ i = (p∗ πd i =(cid:0)pd CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 15 Following the same steps in the proof of Proposition 1, this gives demand: i − θ∗ θ∗ i−1 = vi (vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (p∗ i − ci) and Nash profits As to collusive profits, we know that (due to the fixed market share rule): i vi+1 − vi+1pc i+1 = θ∗ θ∗ pc i+1 = p∗ i vi − vipc vi vi+1 i+1 + i or (pc i − p∗ i ) In general, the collusive price is then: pc i = p∗ i + v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . Following the covered market assumption, we know that θc i − θc i−1 = θ∗ i − θ∗ i−1 and therefore, πc i = (pc i − θc i − ci)(cid:0)θc Moreover, i−1(cid:1) =(cid:18)p∗ i + (pc 1 − p∗ v1 vi 1) − ci(cid:19)(cid:18) vi(vi+1 − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (p∗ i − ci)(cid:19) . pd i = = = vi+1 (vi − vi−1) pc i+1 + vi−1 (vi+1 − vi) pc 2vi (vi+1 − vi−1) i−1 + vi (vi+1 − vi−1) ci vi+1 (vi − vi−1)(cid:18)p∗ i+1 + v1(pc 1 1) −p∗ vi+1 (cid:19) + vi−1 (vi+1 − vi)(cid:18)p∗ i−1 + v1(pc 1 1) −p∗ vi−1 (cid:19) + vi (vi+1 − vi−1) ci vi+1 (vi − vi−1) p∗ i+1 + vi−1 (vi+1 − vi) p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + vi (vi+1 − vi−1) ci 2vi (vi+1 − vi−1) i−1 + (vi+1 − vi−1) v1 (pc 2vi (vi+1 − vi−1) = p∗ i + 1 2 v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ 1) . Combining the above profit specifications gives πd i − πc i = = = i − ci(cid:1)2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) vi (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:0)pd vi (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:20)(cid:16)p∗ vi (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:20) 1 4(cid:16) v1 vi(cid:17)2 i + 1 2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) (pc 1 − p∗ 1) − ci(cid:17)2 1)2(cid:21) . vi(vi+1 − vi−1) (p∗ i + v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ i − ci)(cid:16)p∗ (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) − v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ − (p∗ i − ci)2 − v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ 1) (p∗ 1) − ci(cid:17) i − ci)(cid:21) (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) IWAN BOS AND MARCO A. MARINI 16 and πd i − π ∗ i = = = = i + 1 2 i − ci(cid:1)2 (vi+1 − vi) (vi − vi−1) vi (vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:0)pd vi(vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:18)(cid:16)p∗ vi(vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:18) 1 4(cid:16) v1 vi(cid:17)2 vi(vi+1 − vi−1)(cid:16) v1 (pc vi − i − ci)2 vi(vi+1 − vi−1) (p∗ (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1) v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ − (p∗ 1) − ci(cid:17)2 (pc 1 − p∗ 1)2 + v1 vi (pc 1 − p∗ 1) (p∗ (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1) (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1) 4(cid:16) v1 vi(cid:17) (pc 1)(cid:17)(cid:16) 1 (vi+1 − vi) · (vi − vi−1) 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ i − ci)2(cid:19) i − ci)(cid:19) i − ci)(cid:17) . Thus, the critical discount factor of an intermediate firm i in Hackner's (1994) setting with cost heterogeneity and n firms is: (vi+1−vi)(vi−vi−1)(cid:17)(cid:20) 1 (cid:16) vi(vi+1−vi−1) 4(cid:16) v1 vi(cid:17)2 vi(cid:17) (pc 4(cid:16) v1 1)(cid:17)(cid:16) 1 1 − p∗ (pc (pc (cid:16) vi(vi+1−vi−1) (vi+1−vi)·(vi−vi−1)(cid:17)(cid:16) v1 vi 1 − p∗ 1)2(cid:21) 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ i − ci)(cid:17) 1 − p∗ 1) 1) + (p∗ i − ci) = 1 4 v1 (pc 1 4 v1 (pc 1 − p∗ 1 − p∗ 1) 1) + vi (p∗ . i − ci) δ ≥ δi = πd i − πc i πd i − π ∗ i = = 1 vi(cid:17) (pc 4(cid:16) v1 4(cid:16) v1 vi(cid:17) (pc 1 − p∗ 1 Results for the highest and lowest quality firm can be derived in a similar way (see the proof of Proposition 1). Recall that the corresponding critical discount factor in Proposition 1 is given by δ ≥ δi = i − πc πd i πd i − π ∗ i = 1 4 (pc 1 − p∗ 1) 1 − p∗ 1) + (p∗ i − ci) 1 4 (pc . Observe that, compared to the result of Proposition 1, it is now possible that a firm with a higher competitive profit margin is more eager to leave the cartel when it is of sufficiently low quality (i.e., a high p∗ i − ci may be more than neutralized by a low vi) and vice versa. The result of Proposition 1 does apply, however, when the noncollusive price-cost margin is increasing in quality. Moreover, and in contrast to Hackner, it is indeed the lowest- quality supplier who has the tightest incentive constraint when differences in unit costs are sufficiently small (in accordance with the result of the Corollary). As to the latter, note that Hackner (1994) considers a duopoly without costs and does not impose a fixed market share rule, which is an important driver of our finding. References [1] Ecchia, Giulio and Luca Lambertini (1997), "Minimum Quality Standards and Collusion," Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(1), 101-113. [2] Friedman, James W. (1991), Game Theory with Applications to Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [3] Gabszewicz, Jean J. and Jacques-Fran¸cois Thisse (1979), "Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities," Journal of Economic Theory, 20(3), 340-359. CARTEL STABILITY UNDER QUALITY DIFFERENTIATION 17 [4] Hackner, Jonas (1994), "Collusive pricing in markets for vertically differentiated products," Interna- tional Journal of Industrial Organization, 12(2), 155-177. [5] Harrington, Joseph E. Jr. (2006), "How do Cartels Operate?," Foundations and Trends in Microeco- nomics, 2(1), 1-105. [6] Marini, Marco A. (2018), "Collusive Agreements in Vertically Differentiated Markets", in Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume 2: Applications, L. C. Corchon and M. A. Marini (eds.), Edward Elgar, Chelthenam, UK, Northampton, MA, USA. [7] Mussa, Michael and Sherwin Rosen (1978), "Monopoly and Product Quality," Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2), 301-317. [8] Shaked, Avner and John Sutton (1982), "Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation," Review of Economic Studies, 49 (1), 3-13. [9] Symeonidis, George (1999), "Cartel stability in advertising-intensive and R&D-intensive industries," Economics Letters, 62, 121-129. [10] Tirole, Jean (1988), "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. [11] Vives, Xavier (2000), Oligopoly Pricing. Old Ideas and New Tools. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts.
1905.03615	2	1905	2019-10-18T14:04:59	On the Kolkata index as a measure of income inequality	[ "econ.TH", "cond-mat.stat-mech" ]	We study the mathematical and economic structure of the Kolkata (k) index of income inequality. We show that the k-index always exists and is a unique fixed point of the complementary Lorenz function, where the Lorenz function itself gives the fraction of cumulative income possessed by the cumulative fraction of population (when arranged from poorer to richer). We show that the k-index generalizes Pareto's 80/20 rule. Although the k and Pietra indices both split the society into two groups, we show that k-index is a more intensive measure for the poor-rich split. We compare the normalized k-index with the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index and discuss when they coincide. We establish that for any income distribution the value of Gini coefficient is no less than that of the Pietra index and the value of the Pietra index is no less than that of the normalized k-index. While the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index are affected by transfers exclusively among the rich or among the poor, the k-index is only affected by transfers across the two groups.	econ.TH	econ	On the Kolkata index as a measure of income inequality Suchismita Banerjee Economic Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India. Email: [email protected] Bikas K. Chakrabarti Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, and Economic Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India. Email: [email protected] Manipushpak Mitra Economics Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India. Email: [email protected] Suresh Mutuswami School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom, and Economics Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India. Email: [email protected] Abstract We study the mathematical and economic structure of the Kolkata (k) index of income inequality. We show that the k-index always exists and is a unique fixed point of the complementary Lorenz function, where the Lorenz function itself gives the fraction of cumulative income possessed by the cumulative fraction of population (when arranged from poorer to richer). We argue in what sense the k-index generalizes Pareto's 80/20 rule. Although the k and Pietra indices both split the society into two groups, we show that k-index is a more intensive measure for the poor-rich split. We compare the normalized k-index with the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index and discuss when they coincide. Specifi- cally, we identify the complete family of Lorenz functions for which the three indices coincide. While the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index are affected by transfers exclusively among the rich or among the poor, the k-index is only affected by transfers across the two groups. Keywords: Lorenz function, Gini coefficient, Pietra index, k-index 1. Introduction In the Lorenz curve (see [11] for more details) one plots the proportion of the total income of the population that is earned by the bottom p proportion of the population. See Figure 1, where we plot accumulated proportions of the population from poorest to richest along the horizontal axis and total income held by these proportions of the population along the vertical axis. The 45◦ line represents a situation of perfect equality. Preprint submitted to Elsevier October 21, 2019 Often we are interested in a summary statistic of the Lorenz function.1 This is because the Lorenz curves can intersect each other meaning that we cannot order the curves. One way of dealing with this is to rely on a summary statistic (see [1] for more details). The most popular summary statistic is the Gini coefficient (see [10]) which is the ratio of the area between the 45◦ line and the Lorenz curve to the total area under the 45◦ line. The Pietra index (see [12]) is the maximum value of the gap between the 45◦ line and the Lorenz curve (see also [7]). In this paper, we are specifically interested in a particular summary index called the Kolkata index or the k-index (see [9] for more details) which is that proportion kF such that kF + LF (kF ) = 1 where LF (p) is the Lorenz function (also see [2]). We can understand kF better as follows. Suppose we split society into two groups: the "poor" who constitute a fraction p of the population and the remaining "rich." Note that LF (p) ≤ p; hence, p is an upper bound on the income share of the poor. The actual share of the rich, on the other hand, is 1−LF (p). The k-index splits society into two groups in a way that the egalitarian income share of the poor equals the actual income share of the rich.2 The k-index takes values in the range [1/2, 1] which makes it different from the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index, both of which take values in the range [0, 1]. However, a simple normalization of the k-index, namely KF ≡ 2kF − 1, achieves this. Like the other two indices, the extreme values of the normalized k-index correspond to complete equality (KF = 0) and complete inequality (KF = 1) respectively. The normalized k-index was first introduced in [3] and was called the "perpendicular-diameter index" (see [3], [4], [5]). We show that the k-index is a fixed-point of the function LF (p) ≡ 1− LF (p) which we call the complimentary Lorenz function. In particular, we show that the fixed-point exists and is unique for all Lorenz functions. We also show that the k-index generalizes Pareto's 80/20 rule: "20% of the people own 80% of the income." The k-index has the property that [100(1 − kF )]% of the people own [100kF ]% of the income. Or, equivalently, [100kF ]% of the people only have [100(1 − kF )]% of the income. We show that both the k and the Pietra indices split society into two groups and we discuss the differences between the two indices in this regard. We compare the normalized k-index with the Gini coeffeicient and the Pietra index and obtain certain important conclusion in terms of coincidence possibilities between all or any two of these three measures. We show that for any given income distribution the value of Gini coefficient is no less than that of the Pietra index and the value of the Pietra index is no less than that of the normalized k-index. We also demonstrate that while the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index are affected by transfers exclusively among the rich or among the poor, the k-index ranks is only affected by transfers across the two groups. 2. The framework Let F be the distribution function of a non-negative random variable X which represents the income distribution in a society. The left-inverse of F is 1We will use the terms Lorenz function and Lorenz curve interchangeably in this paper. 2[13] uses the k-index to define a generalized Gini coefficient. 2 LF (p) KF 1 1 2 LF (p) 1 2 (0,0) 1 2 kF p∗F 1 Figure 1: The red curve is the Lorenz function and the blue curve is the complementary F ( 1 Lorenz function. The normalized k-index is KF = kF − LF (kF ) = 2kF − 1 and p∗ 2 ) is the population proportion associated with the point of intersection of the Lorenz and the reverse order Lorenz functions (colour online). F = L−1 0 F −1(t)dt. defined as F −1(t) = inf x{xF (x) ≤ t}. Assume that the mean income µ = R ∞ 0 xdF (x) is finite. In this case, we obtain an alternative representation of the mean: µ =R 1 The Lorenz function, defined as LF (p) = (1/µ)R p 0 F −1(t)dt, gives the pro- portion of total income earned by the bottom 100p% of the population. The fol- lowing properties of the Lorenz function are well-known: (i) LF (0) = 0, LF (1) = 1 and LF (p) ≤ p for p ∈ (0, 1), and (ii) the Lorenz function is continuous (see [8]), non-decreasing and convex. The complementary Lorenz function is defined as LF (p) = 1 − LF (p) . It measures the proportion of the total income that is earned by the top 100(1−p)% of the population: LF (p) := 1 − LF (p) = 1 − p R0 F −1(t)dt µ 1 Rp = F −1(t)dt . µ (1) It follows straightforwardly that LF (0) = 1, LF (1) = 0, and 0 ≤ LF (p) ≤ 1 for p ∈ (0, 1). Furthermore, LF is continuous, non-increasing and concave on (0, 1). The Gini coefficient is given by GF = 2R 1 0 (p − LF (p))dp. The Pietra index It is easy to show that this function is maximized at maximizes p − LF (p). p = F (µ); hence, we can define the Pietra index alternatively as PF = F (µ) − LF (F (µ)). Different representations of these indices can be found in [6]. 3 3. Structure of the k-index 3.1. k-index as a fixed point of the complementary Lorenz function As mentioned, the k-index is defined by the solution to the equation kF + LF (kF ) = 1. It has been proposed as a measure of income inequality (see [2], [9] for more details). We can rewrite kF + LF (kF ) = 1 as kF = 1 − LF (kF ) = LF (kF ). Hence, the k-index is a fixed point of the complementary Lorenz func- tion. Since the complementary Lorenz function maps [0, 1] to [0, 1] and is con- tinuous, it has a fixed point by Brouwer's fixed point theorem. Furthermore, since LF (p) is non-increasing, the fixed point has to be unique. We can say a little more about the location of the fixed point. Let p∗F = L−1 F (1/2). Given any Lorenz function LF (p), p∗F is that fraction of the popula- tion having 50% of the total income and this fraction is intimately related to the "horizontal-diameter index" (see [3], [4], [5] and [6]). Observe that p∗F ≥ 1/2 with the equality holding only if we have an egalitarian income distribution. We claim that the unique fixed point of LF lies in the interval [1/2, p∗F ]. Let ZF (p) = LF (p) − p, p ∈ [0, 1]. Note that ZF is continuous. Since LF (p) ≤ p, we have ZF (1/2) ≥ 0. Also, ZF (p∗F ) = LF (p∗F ) − p∗F ≤ LF (p∗F ) − LF (p∗F ) = 0. It follows from the Intermediate Value Theorem that there exists kF ∈ [1/2, p∗F ] such that ZF (kF ) = 0. Therefore, we have established the following: (FP) There exists a kF ∈ [1/2, p∗F ] such that LF (kF ) = kF ⇔ LF (kF ) + kF = 1 and this kF is unique. Observe that if LF (p) = p (egalitarian income distribution), then kF = 1/2. For any other income distribution, 1/2 < kF < 1. It is interesting to note that while the Lorenz curve typically has only two trivial fixed points (the two end points), the complementary Lorenz function has a unique non-trivial fixed point kF . This fixed point kF lies between 50% population proportion and the population proportion p∗F = L−1 F (1/2) that we associate with 50% income given the income distribution F . Case 1. Let F be the uniform distribution on [a, b] where 0 ≤ a < b < ∞. Then, LF (p) = p [1 − {(1 − p)(b − a)/(b + a)}] and kF = −(3a + b) + √5a2 + 6ab + 5b2 . 2(b − a) It is interesting to note that if a = 0, then LF (p) = p2 and kF is the reciprocal of the Golden ratio, that is, kF = (√5 − 1)/2 = 1/φ where φ = (√5 + 1)/2 is the Golden ratio. Case 2. Let F be the exponential distribution function given by F (x) = 1 − e−λx where x ≥ 0 and λ > 0. Then, LF (p) = p − (1 − p) ln(1/(1 − p)), LF (p) = (1 − p) [1 + ln{1/(1 − p)}] and kF ∼ 0.6822. Case 3. The Pareto distribution is given by F (x) = 1−(xm/x)α on the support [xm,∞) where α > 1 and the minimum income is xm > 0. Then, LF (p) = 1 − α and LF (p) = (1− p)1− (1− p)1− α = kF . If α = ln 5/ ln 4 ∼ 1.16, then kF = 0.8 and we get what is known as the Pareto principle or the 80/20 rule. α . The k-index is a solution to (1− kF )1− 1 1 1 4 3.2. k-index as a generalization of the Pareto principle The Pareto principle is based on Pareto's observation (in the year 1906) that approximately 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population. The evidence, though, suggests that the income distribution of many countries fails to satisfy the 80/20 rule (see [9]). The k-index can be thought of as a generalization of the Pareto principle. Note that LF (kF ) = 1 − kF ; hence, the top 100(1 − kF )% of the population has 100(1 − (1 − kF )) = 100kF % of the income. Hence, the "Pareto ratio" for the k-index is kF /(1 − kF ). Observe, however, that this ratio is obtained endogenously from the income distribution and in general, there is no reason to expect that this ratio will coincide with the Pareto principle.3 Given any income distribution F , for any p ∈ [0, p∗F ] with p∗F = L−1 F (1/2), let rF (p) = L−1 F (1−p). Consider the interval C(p) = [min{p, rF (p)}, max{p, rF (p)}]. To understand what C(p) signifies, let p = 0.2. That is, we consider the poorest 20% (or 100p%) as undeniably poor. To identify the dividing line between the poor and the rich, one strategy is to eliminate those who are undeniably rich. We do this by considering the fraction of the rich whose income share is exactly 100(1− p)%. That is, we identify p′ such that LF (p′) = 0.8 = 1− p. Eliminating the poor and the undeniably rich, we find that the dividing line between poor and rich must lie in the interval [min{p, rF (p)}, max{p, rF (p)}]. We now ask the question: What proportions are in the set [min{p, rF (p)}, max{p, rF (p)}] for all p ∈ [0, p∗F ]? The answer is that only kF meets this criterion. Specifi- cally, for any p ∈ [0, p∗F ], define the potential income disparity division set as C(p) = {t min{p, rF (p)} ≤ t ≤ max{p, rF (p)}}. We show in the appendix that (2) kF = ∩p∈[0,p∗ F ]C(p). 3.3. Interpreting the k-index in terms of rich-poor disparity The Gini coefficient, as is well-known, measures inequality by the area be- tween the Lorenz curve and the 45-degree line. For any p ∈ [0, 1], we can decompose this coefficient into three parts: two representing the within-group inequality and one representing the across-group inequality. In Figure 2 be- low, the unshaded area bounded by the Lorenz curve and the line from (0, 0) to (p, LF (p)) is the within-group inequality of the poor. It represents the ex- tent to which inequality can be reduced by redistributing incomes among the poor. Similarly, the area bounded by the Lorenz curve and the line segment from (p, LF (p)) to (1, 1) represents the within-group inequality of the rich. The shaded area represents the across-group inequality. An easy computation shows that the extent of across-group inequality be- tween the bottom p × 100% and top (1 − p) × 100% is the (across-group) dis- parity function DF (p) = (1/2)[p − LF (p)]. One can ask for what value of p is the across-group inequality maximized? The answer is that this is maximized at the proportion associated with the Pietra index. It is well-known that the Pietra index (see [12]) is given by PF := max p∈[0,1] 2DF (p) = max p∈[0,1] [p − LF (p)] = F (µ) − LF (F (µ)). 3The fact that the k-index generalizes Pareto's 80/20 rule was first pointed out in [9] and later also in [3], [5]. 5 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 e m o c n i f o n o i t c a r f 0 0 Lorenz curve (P, L(P )) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 fraction of population Figure 2: The shaded area represents the inter-group inequality. Hence, F (µ) is the proportion where the disparity is maximized. Therefore, one way of understanding the Pietra index is that it splits society into two groups in a way such that inter-group inequality is maximized. This provides a different perspective on the Pietra index. What about the k-index? Let us divide society into two groups, the "poor- est" who constitute a fraction p of the population and the "rich" who constitute a fraction 1− p of the population. Given the Lorenz curve LF (p), we look at the distance of the "boundary person" from the poorest person on the one hand and the distance of this person from the richest person on the other hand. These dis- tances are given by pp2 + LF (p)2 and p(1 − p)2 + (1 − LF (p))2 respectively. Then, the k-index divides society into two groups in a manner such that the Euclidean distance of the boundary person from the poorest person is equal to the distance from the richest person. The value of the disparity function at the k-index is given by DF (kF ) = kF − 1/2. The interpretation of this is quite transparent since it measures the gap between the proportion kF of the poor from the 50 − 50 population split. As long as we do not have a completely egalitarian society, kF > 1/2 and hence it is one way of highlighting the rich-poor disparity with kF defining the income proportion of the top (1 − kF ) proportion of the rich population. The other measures do not have as nice an interpretation. For instance, the value of the disparity function at the proportion corresponding to the Pietra index is DF (F (µ)) = [F (µ) − LF (F (µ))]/2. This number has no obvious interpretation. 3.4. The k-index as a solution to optimization problems The k-index is the unique solution to the following surplus maximization problem: ( LF (t) − t)dt. (3) kF = argmax P∈[0,1] P Z0 6 Therefore, kF is that fraction of the lower income population for which the area between the complementary Lorenz function and the income distribution line associated with the egalitarian distribution is maximized. Condition (3) follows since LF (p) ≥ p for all p ∈ [0, kF ] and LF (p) < p for all p ∈ (kF , 1]. For the same reason the k-index is also the unique solution to the following surplus minimization problem (which is the dual of the problem in (3)): kF = argmin P∈[0,1] 1 ZP {(1 − t) − LF (t)}dt. (4) Therefore, (1−kF ) is that fraction of the higher income population for which the area between the income distribution line associated with the egalitarian distribution and the Lorenz function is minimized. 4. Comparing the normalized k-index with the Pietra index and the Gini coefficient We start our comparison by specifying a family of Lorenz functions for each of which the Gini coefficient coincides with the Pietra index and yet the normalized k-index is different. Case 4. Consider the p-oligarchy Lorenz function discussed in [7] that has the following functional form: For any fraction a ∈ (0, 1), if p ∈ [0, a], if p ∈ (a, 1]. LF (p) =( 0 (p−a) (1−a) (5) See Figure 3 where the Lorenz function given by (5) is represented by the piece- wise linear red line OBA (colour online). It is easy to verify that the proportion A Q B a kF C O Figure 3: GF = PF = a > KF . associated with the Pietra index is F (µ) = a and PF = F (µ) − LF (F (µ)) = 7 a− 0 = a. One can also verify that the Gini coefficient coincides with the Pietra index, that is, GF = PF = a. However, the k-index fraction kF is a solution to the equation (kF − a)/(1 − a) + kF = 1 and it gives kF = 1/(2 − a). Moreover, the normalized k-index yields KF = 2kF − 1 = a/(2 − a). Therefore, for any given a ∈ (0, 1) and any associated Lorenz function given by (5), we have GF = PF = a > a 2 − a = KF . (6) Therefore, Case 4 suggests that the k-index in itself has properties that are different from the other two measures and hence deserves a special theoretical analysis. 4.1. Coincidence of the k-index and the Pietra index The Lorenz function LF (p) is symmetric if for all p ∈ [0, 1], LF ( LF (p)) = 1 − p or equivalently LF (p) + rF (p) = 1, (7) where rF (p) = L−1 F (1 − p). The idea of symmetry is explained in Figure 4. C D A O B Figure 4: Symmetry condition (7) requires that for any proportion p, that the distance LF (p) between the points A = (p, LF (p)) and B = (p, 0) must be the same as the distance 1 − L−1 F (1 − p) between the points C = (L−1 F (1 − p), (1 − p)) and D(1, 1 − p). Case 5. Suppose that the Lorenz function is given by LF (p) = 1 −p1 − p2 (see Figure 5). Observe that LF ( LF (p)) = LF (p1 − p2) = 1 − p and hence the Lorenz function LF (p) = 1 −p1 − p2 is symmetric. The k-index associated with the Lorenz function LF (p) = 1 −p1 − p2 is kF = 1/√2. Moreover, since L′F (p) = p/p1 − p2, at the proportion F (µ) asso- ciated with the Pietra index PF , we have L′F (F (µ)) = F (µ)/p1 − {F (µ)}2 = 1 1−p1 − p2, the normalized k-index KF = 2kF − 1 = √2− 1 coincides with the Pietra index PF = F (µ) − LF (F (µ)) = √2 − 1. Moreover, one can verify that the Gini coefficient is different and is given by GF = π/2 − 1 > PF = KF . implying F (µ) = kF . Therefore, for the Lorenz function given by LF (p) = 8 C= (0, 1) B D O A Figure 5: KF = PF = √2 − 1 < GF = π/2 − 1. kF Case 5 provides an example of a symmetric and differentiable Lorenz function for which kF = F (µ) and hence KF = PF . This result is true in general and in the appendix we prove the following general result. (KP) If the Lorenz function is symmetric and differentiable, then the proportion F (µ) associated with the Pietra index coincides with the proportion kF of the k-index. Hence, we also have KF = PF Observe that (KP) provides a sufficient condition for the coincidence. It is not necessary as the following example shows that we can find a Lorenz function which is not symmetric and yet we have the coincidence of the normalized k and the Pietra indices. LF (p) =( 1 −p1 − p2 √3 √2 2− 1 − (1 − p) if p ∈ [0, 1/√2], otherwise. (8) Note that in (8) we have simply replaced the curve DB in Figure 5 by a straight line between the two points. Even though this Lorenz curve is not symmetric, we can "convert" it into a symmetric one by replacing the segment OD by a corresponding straight line. This change leaves KF and PF unchanged. It is clear that this can be done in general: given any non-symmetric Lorenz curve where KF and PF coincide, we can derive a symmetric Lorenz curve such that the two indices coincide by replacing the Lorenz curves for the poor and the rich by straight lines. This suggests that the symmetry condition is almost necessary. 4.2. Coincidence of the normalized k-index and the Gini coefficient As an instance of coincidence between GF and KF we consider the following family of Lorenz functions. 9 Case 6. For any fraction K ∈ [1/2, 1), consider the associated Lorenz function LF (p) given by LF (p) =(cid:26) (cid:0) 1−K K (cid:1) p (1 − K) + K (1−K) (p − K) if p ∈ [0, K], if p ∈ (K, 1]. (9) In Figure 6, the Lorenz function given by (9) is depicted by the piecewise linear red lines OQ and QB (colour online). C B Q O kF = K A Figure 6: KF = GF = 2K − 1 = PF . It is immediate that LF (K) + K = (1 − K) + K = 1 implying that kF = K. Moreover, R t=1 t=0 LF (t)dt = 1 − K and hence GF = 1 − 2(1 − K) = 2K − 1 = 2kF − 1 = KF . Also note that the difference p − LF (p) is maximized at p = K and hence F (µ) = kF = K. Therefore, we have GF = KF = PF = 2K − 1.4 (10) Therefore, Case 6 shows that for the family of Lorenz functions given by (9), GF coincidences with KF and as a result PF also coincides. We claim that this is no exception. More generally, in the appendix we show the following: (GK-P) For any income distribution F , GF ≥ PF ≥ KF . Moreover, if GF = PF = KF , then the Lorenz function is given by (9). Eliazar [3] obtains the same order across the three indices using appropriate maximization exercises on the Lorenz set which is obtained by taking the area between two types of Lorenz curves on the unit square. The first type is the standard Lorenz curve LF (p) and the second type of Lorenz curve is ¯LF (p) = t=1−p F −1(t)dt. However, the technique we apply to obtain the order across the three indices is mainly based on convexity of the Lorenz function (see (1/µ)R t=1 4Observe that if K = 1/2, then from (9) we have the Lorenz function for egalitarian income, that is, LF (p) = p for all p ∈ [0, 1] and in that case GF = KF = PF = 0. 10 Appendix). Moreover, we not only provide the order across the three indices, we also identify the complete family of Lorenz functions for which the three indices coincide. 5. Ranking the Lorenz functions using the normalized k-index, the Pietra index and the Gini coefficient One important aspect of summary statistics is to rank different Lorenz curves. Here we demonstrate that the three indices can provide very differ- ent rankings. Case 7. Consider the following Lorenz functions: 4 9p−1 8 LF1 (p) =(cid:26) 3p LF2(p) =(cid:26) 8p 9 16p−7 9 if p ∈ [0, 1/3], if p ∈ (1/3, 1]. if p ∈ [0, 7/8], if p ∈ (7/8, 1]. (11) (12) Observe that the population fraction associated with the Pietra index is F1(µ1) = 1/3 for the Lorenz function LF1(p) and is F2(µ2) = 7/8 for the Lorenz function LF2(p). Since PFi = Fi(µi) − LFi(Fi(µi)) for i = 1, 2, we get PF1 = 1 12 < PF2 = 7 72 . (13) The k-index fraction kF1 associated with the Lorenz function LF1(p) is a solution to the equation (9kF − 1)/8 + kF1 = 1 and it gives kF1 = 9/17. The k-index fraction kF2 associated with the Lorenz function LF2(p) is a solution to the equation 8kF2/9 + kF2 = 1 and it also gives kF2 = 9/17. Therefore, kF1 = kF2 = 9/17 and hence the normalized k-indices are also identical, and, in particular, we have KF1 = KF2 = < PF1 = < PF2 = 1 17 1 12 7 72 . (14) (15) (16) Case 8. Now consider the following two Lorenz functions: LF3(p) = p2, ∀ p ∈ [0, 1]. LF4(p) =(cid:26) p2 1 − 7(1−p) 4 if p ∈ [0, 3/4], if p ∈ (3/4, 1]. The k-index associated with both Lorenz functions LF3(p) and LF4(p) is a so- lution to the equation K 2 + K = 1 and it gives kF3 = kF4 = K = 1/φ where φ = (√5 + 1)/2 is the Golden ratio. Therefore, KF3 = KF4 = 2/φ− 1 ≃ 0.23607. However, Gini coefficient associated with the two Lorenz functions LF3(p) and LF4(p) are different. In particular, one can show that GF3 = 2R 1 0 [t− t2]dt = 1/3 and GF4 = 2R 3/4 [t − t2]dt +R 1 KF3 = KF4 = 2/φ − 1 < GF4 = 21/64 < GF3 = 1/3. 3/4[(3/4)(1 − t)]dt = 21/64. (17) 0 11 Case 8 demonstrates an important difference between KF and GF . The Gini is affected by transfers within a group. In particular, the poor are unaffected but the rich have become more egalitarian while moving from LF3 to LF4. The nor- malized k-index on the other hand is unaffected with such intra-group transfers. This suggests that if we are interested in reducing inequality between groups, then the normalized k-index is a better indicator. 6. Summary We summarize the main results of this paper: 1. The k-index always exists and is a unique fixed point of the complementary Lorenz function. While the Lorenz function has two trivial fixed points, the complementary Lorenz function has one non-trivial fixed point kF and it gives the value of the Kolkata index or the k-index (see Section 3.1). 2. The k-index generalizes Pareto's 80/20 rule. The k-index has the property that [100(1 − kF )]% of the people own [100kF ]% of the income. We also provide an argument as to why kF is a correct and endogenously obtained dividing population proportion between the rich and the poor in a society with income distribution F (see condition (2) on Section 3.2). 3. Although the k and Pietra indices both split the society into two groups, the k-index is more transparent measure for the poor-rich split. 4. The k-index also has interpretations as a solution to optimization prob- lems. The k-index maximizes the area between the complementary Lorenz function and the income distribution line associated with the egalitarian distribution. Hence, (1 − kF ) minimizes the area between the income dis- tribution line associated with the egalitarian distribution and the Lorenz function. 5. We compare the normalized k-index (KF := 2kF − 1) with the Gini coef- ficient GF and the Pietra index PF . If the Lorenz function is symmetric, then the normalized k-index coincides with the Pietra index (see Section 4.1). We show for any given income distribution, GF ≥ PF ≥ KF . We have also identified the complete set of Lorenz functions for which the coincidence between the normalized k-index with the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index takes place (see Section 4.2). 6. Finally, we show that the ranking of Lorenz functions from the k-index is different from that of the Pietra index as well as from the Gini coeffi- cient. The Gini coefficient and the Pietra index are affected by transfers exclusively among the rich or among the poor, the k-index ranks is only affected by transfers across the two groups (see Section 5). We conclude by noting that throughout our paper we have specified the k- index, the Gini coefficient and the Pietra index as measures of income inequality. Clearly, income inequality is just one application of the ideas in this paper. We can use these indices for measuring wealth or other social inequalities. In general, the k-index can be useful for quantifying heterogeneity in any social system. 12 7. Appendix Proof of (2): If p = kF , then min{kF , rF (kF )} = max{kF , rF (kF )} = kF implying C(kF ) = {kF}. If p ∈ [0, kF ), then LF (kF ) = 1 − kF < 1 − p and from non-decreasingness of LF (.) we get kF ≤ r(p). Therefore, if p ∈ [0, kF ), then p < kF ≤ rF (p) and kF ∈ C(p). Similarly, if p ∈ (kF , p∗F ], then LF (kF ) = 1 − kF > 1 − p ⇒ kF ≥ rF (p). Therefore, if p ∈ (kF , p∗F ], then p > kF ≥ rF (p) and kF ∈ C(p). Proof of (KP): Specifically, using the symmetry and differentiability of the Lorenz function it follows that −(1/L′F (rF (p)))+L′F (p) = 0 and, given L′F (F (µ)) = 1 at the population fraction F (µ) associated with Pietra index, it follows that L′F (rF (F (µ))) = 1 ⇒ F −1(rF (F (µ))) = µ ⇒ L−1 F (1 − F (µ))) = F (µ) ⇒ F (µ) + LF (F (µ)) = 1 implying F (µ) = kF . (cid:3) (cid:3) Proof of (GK-P): Consider any Lorenz function LF (p) and for any q ∈ (0, 1) define the induced Lorenz function ¯LF (p) =( LF (q) q p (1−q) p − (q−LF (q)) (1−LF (q)) (1−q) if p ∈ [0, q], if p ∈ (q, 1]. (18) In Figure 7, we depict how given any q ∈ (0, 1) we get the induced Lorenz function ¯LF (p) from any given Lorenz function LF (p). B A LF (q) q O Figure 7: The red curve OAB depicts any Lorenz function LF (p) and, for any q ∈ (0, 1), the dotted piecewise linear blue line OAB is the induced Lorenz function ¯LF (p) (colour online). 13 From Figure 7, it is clear that ¯LF (p) ≥ LF (p) for all p ∈ [0, 1]. Hence, Z 1 ¯LF (t)dt 0 LF (t)dt ≤Z q =Z q 0 q LF (q) ¯LF (t)dt +Z 1 tdt +Z 1 + LF (q) − q + 2 q 0 qLF (q) q (cid:26) (1 − LF (q)) (1 − q) (1 − LF (q))(1 + q) t − (1 − q) (cid:27) dt (q − LF (q)) 2 = = 1 + LF (q) − q 2 . Since R t=1 t=0 LF (t)dt = (1 − GF )/2, it follows that GF ≥ q − LF (q) for any q ∈ [0, 1]. Since Pietra index maximizes the function q−LF (q) over all q ∈ [0, 1], it follows that GF ≥ F (µ)−LF (F (µ)) ≥ kF −LF (kF ) implying GF ≥ PF ≥ KF . We now show that if the Gini coefficient coincides with the normalized k index, then the Lorenz function must be given by (9). Consider any population proportion K ∈ [1/2, 1) and given such a K consider any income distribution F such that kF = K.5 Then, the Gini coefficient GF = 1 − 2R t=1 t=0 LF (t)dt coincides with the normalized k-index KF = K − LF (K) if and only if Zt=0 {LF (K) − LF (t)}dt = LF (t)dt = LF (K) ⇔ Zt=K Zt=0 t=K t=1 t=1 {LF (t) − LF (K)}dt. (19) D k C k A (1-k) B (1-k) O Figure 8: KF = GF = PF = 2K − 1. Consider Figure 8 where the area of integral R t=K t=0 {LF (K) − LF (t)}dt is depicted by the region OAB. Given convexity of the Lorenz function, the area OAB is minimized if OAB represents the area of a triangle with base length K 5Possibility of such a selection is guaranteed by the family of Lorenz functions defined by (9). 14 and altitude length (1 − K). Therefore, we have t=K Zt=0 {LF (K) − LF (t)}dt ≥ K(1 − K) 2 . (20) Similarly, in Figure 8, the area of integralR t=1 t=K{LF (t)−LF (K)}dt is depicted by the region ACD. Given convexity of the Lorenz function, the area ACD is maximized if ACD represents the area of a triangle with base length (1 − K) and altitude length K. Therefore, we also have t=1 Zt=K {LF (t) − LF (K)}dt ≤ K(1 − K) 2 . (21) From (20) and (21) it follows that t=K Zt=0 {LF (K) − LF (t)}dt ≥ Applying (22) in (19) we get t=K Zt=0 {LF (K) − LF (t)}dt = K(1 − K) 2 ≥ K(1 − K) 2 = t=1 Zt=K {LF (t) − LF (K)}dt. (22) t=1 Zt=K {LF (t) − LF (K)}dt. (23) Simplification of the first equality in (23) gives t=K t=K 2 = H(t)dt, Zt=0 LF (t)dt = K(1 − K) Zt=0 where H(t) := (1−K) K t for all t ∈ [0, K].6 Observe that LF (0) = H(0) = 0 and LF (K) = H(K) = 1 − K. For any t ∈ [0, K], H(t) is increasing and linear in t and LF (t) is non-decreasing and convex in t and hence LF (t) ≤ H(t) for all t ∈ [0, K]. Therefore, given R t=K t=0 H(t)dt (condition (24)), we have LF (t) = H(t) for all t ∈ [0, K], that is, (24) t=0 LF (t)dt = R t=K (1 − K) t, K ∀ t ∈ [0, K]. LF (t) = (25) Similarly, simplification of the second equality in (23) gives t=1 Zt=K LF (t)dt = K(1 − K) 2 + (1 − K)2 = Zt=0 t=K I(t)dt, (26) 6Note that R t=K t=0 H(t)dt = R t=K t=0 (1−K) K tdt = (1−K) 2K (cid:8)t2(cid:9)t=K t=0 = K(1−K) 2 . 15 where I(t) := (1− K) + K (1−K) (t− K) for all t ∈ [K, 1].7 Observe that LF (K) = I(K) = 1 − K and LF (1) = I(1) = 1. For any t ∈ [K, 1], I(t) is increasing and linear in t and LF (t) is non-decreasing and convex in t and hence LF (t) ≤ I(t) for all t ∈ [K, 1]. Therefore, given R t=1 t=K I(t)dt (condition (26)) we get LF (t) = I(t) for all t ∈ [K, 1], that is, t=K LF (t)dt = R t=1 LF (t) = (1 − K) + K (1 − K) (t − K), ∀ t ∈ [K, 1]. (27) Therefore, if for any income distribution F , the Gini coefficient GF coincides with the normalized k-index KF , then from (25) and (27) (and due to the fact that while selecting any income distribution F such that kF = K, the selection of K ∈ [1/2, 1) was arbitrary) it follows that the Lorenz function must be of the form given by (9). (cid:3) Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to Satya R. Chakravarty and Subramanian Sreenivasan for helpful comments and suggestions. They are also thankful to Arindam Paul for helping with some figures. References [1] R. Aaberge. Characterizations of Lorenz curves and income distributions. Social Choice and Welfare, 17:639 -- 653, 2000. [2] A. Chatterjee, A. Ghosh, and B. K. Chakrabarti. Socio-economic inequal- ity: Relationship between Gini and Kolkata indices. Physica A, 466:583 -- 595, 2017. [3] I. Eliazar. The sociogeometry of inequality: Part i. Physica A, 426:93 -- 115, 2015. [4] I. Eliazar. The sociogeometry of inequality: Part ii. Physica A, 426:116 -- 137, 2015. [5] I. Eliazar. Harnessing inequality. Physics Reports, 649:1 -- 29, 2016. [6] I. Eliazar. A tour of inequality. Annals of Physics, 389:306 -- 332, 2018. [7] I. Eliazar and I. M. Sokolov. Measuring statistical heterogeneity: The Pietra index. Physica A, 389:117 -- 125, 2010. [8] J. P. Gastwirth. A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica, 39(6):1037 -- 1039, 1971. [9] A. Ghosh, N. Chattopadhyay, and B. K. Chakrabarti. Inequality in society, academic institutions and science journals: Gini and k-indices. Physica A, 410:30 -- 34, 2014. 7Note that R t=1 2(1−K) (cid:8)(t − K)2(cid:9)t=1 t=K I(t)dt = R t=1 t=K = (1 − K)2 + K t=K n(1 − K) + K (1−K) (t − K)o dt = (1 − K)2 + K(1−K) . 2 16 [10] C. W. Gini. Variabilit`a e mutabilit`a: Contributo allo studio delle dis- tribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche. C. Cuppini, Bologna, 1912. [11] M. Lorenz. Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9:209 -- 219, 1905. [12] G. Pietra. Delle relazioni tra gli indici di variabilita. Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, 74:775 -- 792, 793 -- 804, 1915. Note I, II. [13] S. Subramanian. Tricks with the Lorenz curve. Economics Bulletin, 30(2):1594 -- 1602, 2010. 17
1905.03452	1	1905	2019-05-09T06:26:14	The Implications of Pricing on Social Learning	[ "econ.TH", "cs.GT" ]	We study the implications of endogenous pricing for learning and welfare in the classic herding model . When prices are determined exogenously, it is known that learning occurs if and only if signals are unbounded. By contrast, we show that learning can occur when signals are bounded as long as non-conformism among consumers is scarce. More formally, learning happens if and only if signals exhibit the vanishing likelihood property introduced bellow. We discuss the implications of our results for potential market failure in the context of Schumpeterian growth with uncertainty over the value of innovations.	econ.TH	econ	The Implications of Pricing on Social Learning. Itai Arieli , Moran Koren, and Rann Smorodinsky Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Technion -- Israel Institute of Technology. 9 1 0 2 y a M 9 May 10, 2019 Abstract ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 2 5 4 3 0 . 5 0 9 1 : v i X r a We study the implications of endogenous pricing for learning and welfare in the classic herding model ([6, 8]). When prices are determined exoge- nously, it is known that learning occurs if and only if signals are unbounded (see Smith and Sørensen [34]). By contrast, we show that learning can occur when signals are bounded as long as non-conformism among con- sumers is scarce. More formally, learning happens if and only if signals exhibit the vanishing likelihood property introduced bellow. We discuss the implications of our results for potential market failure in the context of Schumpeterian growth with uncertainty over the value of innovations. JEL classification: D43, D83, L13. 1 Introduction In many markets of substitute products, the value of the various alternatives may depend on some unknown variable. This may take the form of some future change in regulation, a technological shock, environmental develop- ments, or prices in related upstream markets. Although this information is unknown, individual consumers may receive some private information about these fundamentals. We ask whether, in such an environment, markets ag- gregate information correctly and the ex-post superior product eventually dominates the market. Research supported by GIF research grant no. I-1419-118.4/2017, ISF grant 2018889, Tech- nion VPR grants, the joint Microsoft-Technion e-Commerce Lab, the Bernard M. Gordon Center for Systems Engineering at the Technion, and the TASP Center at the Technion. 1 In this work we focus on the role of social learning in such environments. We study whether the learning process guarantees an efficient outcome. We isolate the role of learning by introducing a simple duopoly model of common value in which consumers, with a unit demand, choose between two substitute products, each with zero marginal cost of production. The timing of the interaction is as follows. Nature randomly chooses one of two states of nature, and so determines the identity of the firm with the superior product. At each stage the two firms observe the entire history of the market -- past prices and consumption decisions -- and simultaneously set prices. Thereafter, a single consumer arrives and receives a private signal regarding the state of nature. The consumer makes his consumption decision based on his signal, the pair of prices for each product, and the entire history of prices and consumption decisions. The consumer can also choose to opt out of buying any product. Our main goal is to identify conditions under which asymptotic learning holds; that is, information is fully aggregated in the market asymptotically. When prices are set exogenously and fixed throughout, the above model is exactly the standard herding model [6, 8]. In that model, as shown by Smith and Sørensen [34], the characterization of asymptotic learning cru- cially depends upon the quality of agents' private signals. In particular, one must distinguish between two families of signals: bounded versus un- bounded. In the unbounded case the private beliefs of the agents are, with positive probability, arbitrarily close to zero and one. Therefore, no matter how many people herd on one of the alternatives, there is always a positive probability that the next agent will receive a signal that will make him break away from the herd toward the other alternative. This property, as shown by Smith and Sørensen [34], entails asymptotic learning. The same logic applies in our model as well: when signals are unbounded, even if the prior is extremely in favor of one product, with positive probability there will be a consumer who gets a sufficiently strong signal,that tilts the consumption decision toward the a priori inferior product; thus, under strategic pricing and unbounded signals, asymptotic learning holds. The learning results in our model depart from those of the canonical model when signals are bounded. In the herding model there is always a positive probability that the suboptimal alternative will eventually be cho- sen by all agents. However, intuition suggests that when prices are endog- enized they serve to prevent such a herding phenomenon. Hypothetically, once society stops learning and a herd develops on the product of one firm, the other firm will lower its product price to attract new consumers and learning will not cease. It turns out that this intuition, although not en- 2 tirely correct, does have some merit. In order for the intuitive argument to hold, signals must exhibit a property referred to here as vanishing likelihood. When signals are bounded the posterior belief of any agent, given his signal, is bounded away from zero and one for any interior prior. The pro- portion of agents whose posterior lies within ε of the posterior distribution's boundaries obviously shrinks to zero as ε goes to zero. We say that signals exhibit vanishing likelihood if the density of consumers at the posterior be- lief distribution's boundaries goes to zero. Consumers who receive signals that induce such extreme posterior be- liefs are those consumers who are likely to go against a herd and purchase the less popular product. We refer to such consumers as nonconformists. With this interpretation in mind the property of "vanishing likelihood" serves as a measure of the prevalence of nonconformism. More particularly, we associate vanishing likelihood with a negligible level of nonconformism while signals that do not exhibit vanishing likelihood are associated with significant nonconformism. When society herds, each agent follows in the footsteps of his predeces- sors and thus, intuitively, one expects nonconformism (when signals do not exhibit vanishing likelihood) to induce learning. Our main result shows that the opposite occurs: in the presence of strategic pricing asymptotic learning holds if and only if signals have the vanishing likelihood property. 1.1 Schumpeterian Growth It is widely agreed that innovation and the evolution of technology con- stantly propel the economy forward. New technologies replace older ones and may improve product quality, reduce production costs, and often com- pletely disrupt an industry. However, not every innovation entails improvement. Arguably, innova- tions that do not entail improvement will naturally be driven out of the market and only those that do will prevail. This argument forms the basis of the evolutionary economics literature that dates back to Marx, Veblen, and Schumpeter. In his seminal work, Schumpeter [33] described the process of economic growth, which he refers to as "Capitalism," as an evolutionary process that is shaped by "gales of creative destruction." Some of his contemporaries had argued that large and profitable firms are the source of innovation and so regulation protecting them was essential to R&D investments. By contrast, Schumpeter argued that incumbent firms, anticipating innovation by potential entrants, invest in R&D to stay ahead of the game. Therefore such regulation is unwarranted, and may even be detrimental. However, 3 such profitable incumbents may also use their power to drive innovation away by lowering prices. This is true in particular when it is hard to identify which innovation constitutes an improvement and which does not. Does the evolutionary process guarantee that the economy will success- fully separate the wheat from the chaff? This question becomes more acute with the accelerated pace of innovation witnessed in the past two decades [29]. Our theoretical results shed light on this issue and relate the outcome of the evolutionary process to the market structure. Our model shows that whenever the proportion of nonconformist consumers (often referred to as "early adopters" in the context of technological revolutions) is insignificant (a phenomenon captured by the technical notion of vanishing likelihood), the evolutionary process successfully sieves the better technologies. How- ever, whenever this proportion is significant then the evolutionary process may fail and policies to support entry may be warranted in order to sustain Schumpeterian growth. In Section 6 we discuss two case studies from the late 90 related to tech- nological innovations. In both cases the innovative technology turned out to be the better than the incumbent one but only in one of these cases was it adopted by society. Our model provides an explanation as it distin- guishes between the two cases, based on whether the underlying information structure complied with the vanishing likelihood condition. 1.2 Related Literature Our work primarily contributes to the work of Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch [8] and Banerjee [6], who introduced models of social learning with agents who act sequentially. Their primary contribution was to point out the possibility of information cascades and market failure when signals are bounded. Smith and Sørensen [34] characterize the information struc- ture that induces such a potential market failure. In these and many of the follow-up papers, prices are assumed exogenous and fixed throughout. The primary departure of our model from this line of research is that our model incorporates endogenous pricing. We associate a favorite firm (product) with each state of nature and allow for the firms to set prices dynamically, based on the information available in the market. Avery and Zemsky [4] incorporate dynamic pricing into herding models. They consider a single firm whose product value is associated with an (un- known) state of nature. Instead of offering the product at a fixed price, as in the earlier papers, they assume that the price is set dynamically to be the expected value of the product conditional on all the publicly available 4 information. Since their primary interest is to study financial markets, they assume that there is a market maker that uses all the publicly available data to set prices. By contrast, we assume that the firms themselves set the prices. A model that is reminiscent of our model is that of Bose et al. [9, 10] who study a monopoly, with a good of uncertain quality, that dynamically adjusts prices to compete against an outside option. Consumers arrive sequentially and make a consumption decision based on their predecessors' decisions, past prices, and an additional private signal. In [9] the authors restrict attention to signal structures with finitely many signals whereas in [10] they further restrict attention to symmetric binary signal structures. In both models it is shown that herding is inevitable and if the public belief is sufficiently in favor of the monopoly, then the monopoly will price low enough to attract all consumers, regardless of their realized signal. As vanishing likelihood never holds when the signal space is finite (see the discussion in Section 5.1), the results of Bose et al., albeit in a monopoly framework, hold in our duopolistic model (see the additional discussion in Section 5.3). Restricting the analysis to finite signal spaces would not allow the unraveling of the vanishing likelihood property that we introduce and that characterizes learning when prices are endogenous. Moscarini and Ottaviani [25] study the duopoly case and their paper focuses on a single-stage interaction with two firms and a single knowledge- able consumer. In fact, it is exactly the model of the stage game (Γ(µ)) we study in Section 3.1, except that their model is restricted to a binary and symmetric signal space. Unsurprisingly, whenever the prior belief is above (or below) some threshold, all equilibria in their model form a de- terrence equilibrium (see definition 6), where one firm prices out the other firm. Clearly, the emergence of a deterrence equilibrium implies that learn- ing stops in the repeated model. The authors go on to provide comparative statics over the threshold public belief for which learning stops as a func- tion of the informativeness of the signal (here is where they leverage the restricted signal space). As signals become more informative the thresholds move to the extremes. Our main result on the one-shot game, Theorem 2, argues that learning stops whenever the vanishing likelihood condition does not hold. As this condition can never hold for a finite signal space the result in [25] follows as a corollary. The main take-home message from comparing our work with [25] is that learning is determined not by the level of informativeness of the signals but rather by the vanishing likelihood condition. In particular, signal distributions that satisfy vanishing likelihood need not be highly in- 5 formative. The restriction to a binary model, in this case, is misleading. A similar distinction is valid in the monopoly setting of Bose et al. [9, 10]. Mueller-Frank [26, 27] introduces a pair of models with dynamic pricing of a monopoly [27] and a duopoly [26]. The model is very similar to ours with the distinction that the firms have the informational advantage and know the true state of the world.1 Mueller-Frank does not characterize the informational conditions that entail learning, as we do. Rather, he studies the connection between welfare and learning and shows that learning is not sufficient for welfare maximization (see Corollary 1). It is worth noting that in our model, by contrast, learning is necessary and sufficient for welfare maximization. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the model and the main theorem for the case where firms are myopic. Section 3 provides the proof of the main result. Section 4 is an extension of our model to the case where firms are farsighted. Section 5 informally discusses some extensions and Section 7 concludes. 2 Social Learning and Myopic Pricing 0, τ t Our model comprises a countably infinite number of consumers, indexed by t ∈ N, and two firms: Firm 0 and Firm 1. There are two states of nature Ω = {0, 1}. In state ω, firm ω ∈ {0, 1} produces the superior product. We normalize the value of the superior product to 1 and the value of the inferior product to 0. In every time period t the two firms first set (non-negative) 1) ∈ [0, 1]2 for their products. Then consumer t receives a private prices (τ t signal and must decide whether to buy product 0, product 1, or neither product. Formally, the action set of every consumer is A = {0, 1, e}, where the action a corresponds to the decision to buy from firm i and the action a = e corresponds to the decision to exit the market and not to buy either product. The payoff of every consumer t, given the price vector (τ0, τ1) as a function of the realized state ω, is u(a, τ0, τ1, ω) = 0 if a = e 1 − τa if a = ω −τa otherwise. (1)   For simplicity we assume that both firms have no marginal cost of pro- duction. Hence, firm i's stage payoff, given a price vector (τ0, τ1), can be 1When firms have an informational advantage the equilibrium analysis, as Mueller-Frank points out, crucially hinges on consumers' off-equilibrium beliefs. This is not the case in our model, which consequently allows for robust observations. 6 described as a function of the consumer's decision as follows: πi(a, τ0, τ1, ω) =   τi if 0 if a = i otherwise. (2) We assume that the state ω is drawn at stage t = 0 according to a commonly known prior distribution, such that P (ω = 0) = µ0 = 1 − P (ω = 1). The state ω is unknown to both the firms and the consumers. Each consumer t ∈ N forms a belief on the state using two sources of information: the history of prices and actions, ht ∈ Ht = ([0, 1]2 × {0, 1, e})t−1, and a private signal st ∈ S (where S is some abstract measurable signal space).2 The firms observe only the realized history ht ∈ Ht at every time t and receive no private information. Conditional on the state ω, signals are independently drawn according to a probability measure Fω. We refer to the tuple (F0, F1, S) as a signal structure. We assume throughout that F0 and F1 are mutually absolutely continuous with respect to each other.3 The prior µ0 and the functions F0 and F1 are common knowledge among consumers and firms. We let H = ∪t≥1Ht be the set of all finite histories and let H∞ = ([0, 1]2×{0, 1, e})∞ be the set of all infinite histories. We let A ⊂ ∆({0, 1, e})[0,1]2 ×S be the set of decision rules for the consumer; i.e., A is the set of all mea- surable functions that map pairs consisting of a price vector and a signal to a consumption decision. A (pure) strategy for consumer t is a measurable function σt : Ht → A that maps every history ht ∈ Ht and signal st ∈ S to a decision rule. We denote by ¯σ = (σt)t≥1 a pure strategy profile for the consumers. We can view ¯σ as a function ¯σ : H → A. A (behavioral) strategy for firm i is a (measurable) mapping ¯φi : H → ∆([0, 1]). We note that the strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) together with the prior µ0 and the signal structure (F0, F1, S) induce a probability distribution P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ) over Ω × H∞ × S∞. Let µt = P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)(ω = 0ht) be the probability that the state is 0 conditional on the realized history ht ∈ H. We call µt the public belief at time t. The following observation regarding the sequence of public beliefs, {µt}∞ t=1, is straightforward. 2An alternative model is to assume that consumers do not observe prices. In this alternative formulation our results go through when restricting attention to pure equilibria. This follows from the observation that the consumption history determines the corresponding equilibrium prices at each stage. 3F0 and F1 are mutually absolutely continuous whenever F0( S) > 0 ⇐⇒ F1( S) > 0 for any measurable set S ⊂ S. Note that with this assumption the probability of a fully revealing signal, for which the posterior probability is either 0 or 1, is zero. 7 Observation 1. {µt}∞ t=1 is a martingale. Thus, by the martingale conver- gence theorem, it must converge almost surely to a limit random variable µ∞ ∈ [0, 1]. A strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) and a history ht induce both an expected payoff Πt i(τ0, τ1, ¯σht) for every firm i and an expected consumer utility ut(τ0, τ1, ¯σht). We can now define the notion of a Bayesian Nash equilibrium for myopic firms. Definition 1. A strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) constitutes a myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium if for every time t the following conditions hold for almost every history ht ∈ Ht that is realized in accordance with P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ): • For every τ ∈ [0, 1], Πt i( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) ≥ Πt i(τ, ¯φ−i, ¯σtht). • For every price vector (τ0, τ1) ∈ [0, 1]2, and every decision rule σ ∈ A, Ut(τ0, τ1, ¯σ(ht)ht) ≥ Ut(τ0, τ1, σht). In words, a strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) constitutes a myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium if for every time t and P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ) almost every history ht ∈ Ht, ¯φi(ht) maximizes the conditional expected stage payoff to every firm i and ¯σ(ht) maximizes the conditional expected payoff to consumer t with respect to every price vector (τ0, τ1). Note that our notion of equilibrium is weaker than the notion of a sub- game perfect equilibrium; however, it still eliminates equilibria with non- credible threats by consumers. One such equilibrium with non-credible threats is the following equilibrium: both firms ask for price 0 in every time period. Every consumer t never buys a product (i.e., plays e) unless both firms ask for a price of 0, in which case he buys product 0 whenever µt ≥ 1 2 and product 1 if µt < 1 2 . Note that this equilibrium is sustained by non- credible threats made by the consumer. Such threats are eliminated by the second condition, which requires that conditional on the realized history ht the decision rule ¯σ(ht) be optimal with respect to every price vector (τ0, τ1), and not just with respect to (τ t 1(ht)). We note that since our results in the sequel hold for all myopic equilibria they are in particular valid for subgame perfect equilibria.4 0(ht), τ t As is common in the literature, we define asymptotic learning as follows. 4A natural question is whether restricting attention to the stronger solution concept yields a weaker condition for learning. We conjecture that this is not the case, particularly when firms are myopic. 8 Definition 2. Fix a signal structure (F0, F1, S). Let µ0 ∈ (0, 1) be the prior and let ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) be a strategy profile of the corresponding game. We say that learning holds for µ0 and ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) if the belief martingale sequence converges almost surely to a point belief assigning probability 1 to the real- ized state. Asymptotic learning holds for the signal structure (F0, F1, S) if learning holds for every prior µ0 and every corresponding myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ). By contrast, asymptotic learning never holds if for every prior µ0 ∈ (0, 1) and a corresponding myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ), the limit public belief µ∞ lies in (0, 1) with positive probability. Thus, when asymptotic learning holds, it must be the case that con- sumers and firms eventually learn the superior product. In our case, even for a very strong public belief in favor of one firm, it is not a priori clear that the strong firm will dominate the market as the weak firm can always lower its price. However, we show in Lemma 2 that the probability of buying from the superior firm converges to one when asymptotic learning occurs. Whenever asymptotic learning doesn't hold, only one firm prevails (from some time on, all consumers buy from one firm but are not 100% certain that it is the superior one). As a result, there is positive probability that the prevailing firm is the inferior one. f0(s) 2 Definition 3. Let fω denote the Radon -- Nikodym derivative of Fω with respect to the probability measure F0+F1 . We consider the random variable p(s) ≡ f0(s)+f1(s) , which is the posterior probability that ω = 0, conditional on the signal s, when the prior over Ω is (0.5, 0.5). Let Gω(x) = Fω({s ∈ Sp(s) < x}), ω = 0, 1, be the two cumulative distribution correspondences of the random variable p(s) induced by the two probability distributions, Fω, ω = 0, 1, over S. Define the bounds ¯α, α of the signal distribution as ¯ follows: α = inf x∈[0,1] Gω(x) > 0 and ¯α = supx∈[0,1] Gω(x) < 1.5 ¯ The main goal of our paper is to provide a characterization of asymptotic learning under strategic pricing in terms of the signal structure (F0, F1, S). Such a characterization is provided by Smith and Sørensen [34] for the standard herding model where prices are set exogenously. We start by presenting the formal definition of bounded and unbounded signals due to Smith and Sørensen [34]. Definition 4. The signal structure (F0, F1, S) is called unbounded if and ¯α = 1. The signal structure (F0, F1, S) is bounded if α = 0 ¯ α > 0 and ¯α < 1. ¯ 5Since F0 and F1 are mutually absolutely continuous it follows that G1 and G0 have the same support. 9 In words, a signal structure is unbounded if for every β ∈ (0, 1) the two sets {s : p(s) > β} and {s : p(s) < β} have positive probability under (Fω)ω=0,1. Smith and Sørensen's characterization shows that in the stan- dard herding model asymptotic learning holds under an unbounded signal structure and fails under a bounded signal structure. 2.1 Characterization of Asymptotic Learning For ease of exposition we make the following assumption on (Gω(x))ω=0,1. We refer the reader to Section 5 for the general case. Assumption 1. We assume that the functions {Gω(x)}ω=0,1 are differen- tiable on ( α, ¯α) with continuous derivatives (gω(x))ω=0,1 : [ ¯ α, ¯α] → R+. ¯ Definition 5. A signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits vanishing likelihood if g1( α) = g0(¯α) = 0. ¯ We next show how information aggregation depends on the vanishing likelihood property. The following theorem provides a full characterization of asymptotic learning in our model. Theorem 1. If signals are unbounded or if signals are bounded and exhibit vanishing likelihood then asymptotic learning holds. If signals are bounded and do not exhibit vanishing likelihood then asymptotic learning never holds. Although Theorem 1 formally hinges on Assumption 1, an analog of this theorem carries over completely to a model without such an assump- tion. This requires an alternative formulation of the vanishing likelihood condition. We elaborate on this in Section 5. α) > Remark 2.1. In fact, the proof of Theorem 1 shows that whenever g1( ¯ 0 the limit public belief µ∞, conditional on state ω = 0, lies in (0, 1) with probability 1. Analogously, whenever g0(¯α) > 0 the limit public belief µ∞, conditional on the state ω = 1, lies in (0, 1) with probability 1. 3 Proof of the Main Result In the proof of Theorem 1 we rely on the analysis of the following three- player stage game Γ(µ). The game comprises two firms and a single con- sumer and is derived from our sequential game by restricting the game to a single period. That is, in Γ(µ) the state is realized according to the prior µ (state 0 is realized with probability µ and state 1 with probability 1 − µ). The two firms post a price simultaneously (possibly at random) and a sin- gle consumer receives a private signal in accordance with (F0, F1, S) and 10 based on his private signal and the realized vector of prices takes an action a ∈ {0, 1, e}. The utility for the consumer is determined by equation (1) and the utility for the firms is determined by equation (2). In the following observation, which is a direct implication of Definition 1, we connect the stage game with the sequential model. Observation 2. A strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) constitutes a myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium if and only if for every time t, for P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ), and for almost every history ht ∈ Ht, the tuple ( ¯φ0(ht), ¯φ1(ht), ¯σ(ht)) is a subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) of Γ(µt). The strong connection of Γ(µ) to our sequential game allows us to de- rive some insight into information aggregation from the subgame perfect equilibrium properties of Γ(µ), which we analyze next. 3.1 Analysis of Γ(µ) We begin by studying the consumer's best-reply strategy in Γ(µ). We denote the consumer's posterior belief after the consumer observes the signal st = s by pµ(s). It follows readily from Bayes' rule that pµ(s) = µp(s) µp(s) + (1 − µ)(1 − p(s)) . (3) The bounds with probability one, where: α and ¯α, together with equation (3), imply that pµ(s) ∈ [ ¯ αµ, ¯αµ] ¯ αµ = ¯ µ µ α ¯ α + (1 − µ)(1 − ¯ and ¯αµ = α) ¯ µ ¯α µ ¯α + (1 − µ)(1 − ¯α) . (4) Fix a price vector τ = (τ0, τ1) and note that the consumer optimizes his expected utility against τ if and only if he follows the following strategy: σ(µ, s, τ ) = a = 0 if pµ(s) − τ0 ≥ max{(1 − pµ(s)) − τ1, 0} a = 1 if (1 − pµ(s)) − τ1 ≥ max{pµ(s) − τ0, 0} (5) a = e otherwise.   We note that, under Assumption 1, in every perfect Bayesian Nash equilib- rium of the game Γ(µ), the strategy σ constitutes a unique action for the consumer almost surely. Note further that every mixed strategy (φ0, φ1) induces two possible market scenarios: a full market scenario, where, under σ, the consumer always buys from one of the firms for almost all signal realizations and al- most every realized price vector τ = (τ0, τ1), and a non-full market scenario, where σ(µ, s, τ ) = e holds with positive probability. 11 We can infer from (5) that the consumer buys from Firm 0 whenever pµ(s)−τ0 ≥ (1−pµ(s))−τ1 and the market is full or whenever pµ(s)−τ0 ≥ 0 and the market is not full. Given a prior µ and a pair of prices (τ0, τ1), we let vµ(τ0, τ1) be the threshold in terms of the private belief discussed above that Firm 0 is chosen. That is, choosing Firm 0 is uniquely optimal for the consumer if and only if p(s) > vµ(τ0, τ1). One can easily see from the above equations that vµ(τ0, τ1) has the following form: vµ(τ0, τ1) =   (1−µ)(1+τ0 −τ1) 2µ−(2µ−1)(1+τ0 −τ1) if the market is full, (1−µ)τ0 µ−(2µ−1)τ0 otherwise. (6) Note that vµ(τ0, τ1) is a continuous function of (µ, τ0, τ1). We can therefore suppress the behavior of the consumer, which, under Assumption 1, is determined uniquely for every price vector (τ0, τ1) and almost every signal realization s ∈ S. Hence we can write the expected utility of Firm 0 in the game Γ(µ) for the price vector τ as follows: Π0(τ0, τ1, µ) = (µ (1 − G0(vµ(τ0, τ1)) + (1 − µ) (1 − G1(vµ(τ0, τ1))) τ0 = (7) [1 − (µG0 (vµ(τ0, τ1)) + (1 − µ)G1 (vµ(τ0, τ1)))] τ0. A similar equation can be derived for Π1(τ, µ), the profit of Firm 1. For a strategy profile φ = (φ0, φ1, σ), let P rφ,µ be the probability over Ω × [0, 1]2 × S; the state, the price vector, and the signal set S are induced by φ, µ and F0, F1. In what follows we make a distinction between two forms of perfect Bayesian Nash equilibria of the game Γ(µ): a deterrence equilibrium, where only a single firm sells with positive probability, and a non-deterrence equi- librium, where both firms sell with positive probability. That is, Definition 6. A deterrence equilibrium in Γ(µ) is a Bayesian Nash SPE, (φ0, φ1, σ), in which there exists a unique firm i such that P rφ,µ(σ(µ, s, τ ) = i) 6= 0. A non-deterrence equilibrium is an equilibrium that is not a deterrence equilibrium. The following theorem summarizes the main characteristics of equilibria in the stage game Γ(µ). This characterization is the driving force behind the proof of Theorem 1. Theorem 2. Let µ ∈ (0, 1) and let (φ0, φ1, σ) be a Bayesian Nash subgame perfect equilibrium of the game Γ(µ): 12 1. If signals are unbounded, then no firm is deterred. 2. If signals are bounded and exhibit the vanishing likelihood property, then no firm is deterred. 3. If signals are bounded and do not exhibit the vanishing likelihood prop- erty, then: (a) If g1( α) > 0, then for some sufficiently high prior, ¯µ ∈ (0, 1), ¯ whenever µ > ¯µ Firm 1 is deterred and Firm 0 captures the whole market. (b) If g0(¯α) > 0, then for some sufficiently low prior, µ ∈ (0, 1), ¯ µ Firm 0 is deterred and Firm 1 captures the whole ¯ whenever µ < market. The proof of Theorem 2 as well as the complete analysis of this stage game is relegated to Appendices A and B. 3.2 Proof of Theorem 1 We next introduce the formal proof of Theorem 1, based on Theorem 2. Consider the case where signals exhibit vanishing likelihood. In this case, by Theorem 2, at every time t no firm is deterred in Γ(µt). Therefore the decision of the consumer remains informative throughout the play. This implies that asymptotic learning always holds. By contrast, if signals do not exhibit vanishing likelihood and g1(¯α) > 0, then for µ > ¯µ all equilibria of Γ(µ) are deterrence equilibria. This implies that when µt crosses ¯µ all subsequent consumers buy from Firm 0 and learning stops. In order to establish Theorem 1 we start with the following corollary of Lemma 5 (the proof can be found at Appendix B). Corollary 1. If signals exhibit vanishing likelihood or if signals are un- α and δ′ > 0 such that bounded, then for every ε > 0 there exists some r > ¯ if µ ∈ [ε, 1 − ε] and φ = (φ0, φ1) is a SPE of Γ(µ), then Pµ,φ(vµ(τ0, τ1) ≥ r) > δ′. A similar condition holds for Firm 1. In words, by Theorem 2, if signals exhibit vanishing likelihood or if signals are unbounded, then the probability of a consumer going against the herd is positive. Corollary 1 argues that this probability cannot be arbitrarily close to zero if the prior is bounded away from the edges. Proof of Theorem 1. First we show that if the signal structure (F0, F1, S) does not exhibit vanishing likelihood, then the martingale of the public 13 Indeed, let us assume without belief must converge to an interior point. α) > 0. Let ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) be a myopic equilibrium. loss of generality that g1( ¯ By Observation 2, for P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ) almost every history ht ∈ Ht the profile (¯σ(ht), ¯φ0(ht), ¯φ1(ht)) is a SPE of Γ(µt). By Theorem 2, there exists ¯µ such that ∀µ ∈ (¯µ, 1) there is a unique Bayesian Nash subgame perfect equilib- rium of Γ(µ) in which the consumer almost surely chooses Firm 0 (Firm 1 is deterred by Firm 0). This implies that if µt ∈ (¯µ, 1], then µt+1 = µt with probability one. We note that since signals are never fully informative it must be the case that µt < 1 for all t with probability one. Therefore, if the vanishing likelihood property does not hold, then asymptotic learning fails. Next we show that if vanishing likelihood holds, then the public belief martingale converges to a limit belief in which the true state is assigned probability one. It follows from Observation 2 that ( ¯φ0(ht), ¯φ1(ht), ¯σ(ht)) is a SPE of Γ(µt) for P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ) almost every history ht ∈ Ht. Corollary 1 implies that if µt ∈ [ǫ, 1 − ǫ] then for some δ′ > 0 and r > α the realized ¯ price vector (τ0, τ1) satisfies vµt (τ0, τ1) ≥ r with probability at least δ′. Since the distribution G0(·) first-order stochastically dominates G1(·) (see Lemma 10 in Appendix D), under any such price vector (τ0, τ1) there exists a probability at least G0(r) > 0 that the consumer will not buy from Firm 0. Note that (again by Lemma 10) G0(vµt (τ0, τ1)) G1(vµt (τ0, τ1)) ≤ G0(r) G1(r) = β < 1. Therefore, it follows from Bayes' rule that with probability at least G0(r)δ′ the public belief µt+1 satisfies µt+1 1 − µt+1 = µt 1 − µt G0(vµt (τ0, τ1)) G1(vµt (τ0, τ1)) ≤ µt 1 − µt β. (8) Hence, in particular, if µt ∈ [ǫ, 1 − ǫ], then there exists a positive constant η > 0 such that, with probability at least G0(r)δ′, it holds that µt+1 −µt > η. By Observation 1, the limit µ∞ = limt→∞ µt exists and by the above argument µ∞ ∈ {0, 1} with probability 1. This shows that asymptotic learning holds. 4 Social Learning and Farsighted Firms In this section we show that our main result carries forward to a setting where the firms are farsighted and maximize a discounted expected revenue stream. We extend our sequential model to the non-myopic case by defining In this model, as in the the non-myopic sequential consumption game. 14 myopic case, each firm sets a price in every time period, except that now each firm tries to maximize its discounted sum of the stream of payoffs. We still retain the perfection assumption with respect to consumers. Given a strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ), in the repeated game, denote by Πδ i ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) the expected payoff to Firm i when the discount factor is δ > 0. Namely, Πδ i ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) = E( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)(cid:16)(1 − δ) ∞ Xt=1 δt−1Πt i( ¯φ0(ht), ¯φ1(ht), ¯σ(ht)ht)(cid:17). Define a Bayesian Nash equilibrium as follows. Definition 7. A strategy profile ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) constitutes a Bayesian Nash equilibrium if: • For every strategy ¯ψi of Firm i, Πδ i ( ¯φi, ¯φ−i, ¯σ) ≥ Πδ i ( ¯ψi, ¯φ−i, ¯σ). • For every time t the following condition holds for almost every history ht ∈ Ht that is realized in accordance with P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ), every price vector (τ0, τ1) ∈ [0, 1]2, and every decision rule σ ∈ A: ut(τ0, τ1, ¯σ(ht)ht) ≥ ut(τ0, τ1, σht). Let ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) be a strategy profile, let ht ∈ Ht, and denote by Πδ i ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) the continuation payoff to Firm i in the subgame starting at history ht ∈ Ht. i ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) is well defined for almost every history ht ∈ Ht Note that Πδ that is realized in accordance with P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ). By Definition 7, if ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) constitutes a Bayesian Nash equilibrium, then ¯φi maximizes the continua- i ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) of Firm i for almost every history ht ∈ Ht that tion payoff Πδ is realized in accordance with P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ). We can now state our first result for farsighted firms. Theorem 3. If the signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits the vanishing like- lihood property or if signals are unbounded, then asymptotic learning holds for every discount factor δ < 1.6 By Theorem 3, vanishing likelihood is a sufficient condition for asymp- totic learning.7 For the converse direction we establish the following weaker statement. 6Recall this implies that learning takes place for any prior and any corresponding Bayesian Nash equilibrium. 7The fact that asymptotic learning holds for unbounded signals carries forward to the far- sighted case under a similar proof to that of the myopic case. 15 Theorem 4. If signals are bounded and do not exhibit vanishing likelihood, then asymptotic learning fails in the following sense: for every prior µ0 ∈ (0, 1) there exists a Bayesian Nash equilibrium for which learning fails. That is, in order for asymptotic learning always to hold in a Bayesian Nash equilibrium it is necessary and sufficient for the signal structure to exhibit vanishing likelihood. We conjecture that, in fact, if vanishing likeli- hood fails then learning fails in any equilibrium. 5 Discussion We turn to discuss four natural questions that arise from our model and analysis:8 • Do our conclusions hold when the differentiability assumption on the signal distribution (Assumption 1) is relaxed? • What are the implications of vanishing likelihood in the monopolistic setting? • What are the social welfare implications of our results? • In cases where asymptotic learning holds, how fast do agents learn and consequently buy the superior product? 5.1 General Signals Throughout the analysis we have restricted our attention to signal structures (F0, F1, S) that satisfy Assumption 1. In many applications this assump- tion fails to hold. In particular, Assumption 1 does not hold when the set of signals is countable or finite. It is therefore important to understand whether our condition can be stated more generally to capture all signal distributions. Fortunately, it turns out that such a general condition does exist. Let (F0, F1, S) be a general signal distribution and let Gω be the CDFs as defined in Definition 3. Define g0, g1 ∈ [0, ∞] as follows: g0 = lim inf α+ ¯ x→ G0(x) x − α ¯ and g1 = lim inf x→ ¯α− 1 − G1(x) ¯α − x . Obviously, g0, g1 are both well defined. Note that g0 is defined using the α+) whereas g1 uses the limit from the right limit from the left (x → ¯ (x → ¯α−). We can now state the more general condition for vanishing likelihood as follows. 8We thank anonymous reviewers for prompting these questions. 16 Definition 8. The signal structure (F0, F1, S) satisfies vanishing likelihood if g0 = g1 = 0. Note that if (F0, F1, S) satisfies Assumption 1, then the condition in Definition 8 coincides with the condition in Definition 5. Moreover, note that for finite signal distribution we have g0 = g1 = ∞, and thus vanishing likelihood fails. Our results hold verbatim under the more general definition of vanishing likelihood for when firms are myopic. We omit the proofs for the general setting but note that the underly- ing ideas for the proofs are similar while their exposition becomes more cumbersome. The primary reason for this is that with an arbitrary signal structure the consumer can be indifferent between two options (e.g., indif- ferent between the two products or between a product and exiting) with positive probability. Therefore, given a price pair, the consumer may have more than one best reply. In addition, it is not necessarily the case that any such best reply induces a two-player game between the firms that pos- sesses an equilibrium. The underlying reason is that the consumer strategy may lead to discontinuity in firms' payoffs as a function of prices. Under Assumption 1 the consumer has a unique best reply with probability one and such discontinuity can be ignored.9 An additional challenge that results from the aforementioned disconti- nuity pertains to the mere existence of an equilibrium in Γ(µ). Absent this equilibrium, our results become vacuous. Fortunately, we can use the result of Reny [30] to overcome this. Consider the following specific best-reply consumer strategy: whenever a consumer is indifferent between buying from one firm and the outside option he always chooses to buy from the firm. Whenever a consumer is indifferent between buying from Firm 0 and Firm 1, and his expected utility from purchasing a product is at least zero, he chooses the firm that is a priori favorable. That is, in this case he chooses Firm 0 whenever µ ≥ 1 2 and Firm 1 whenever µ < 1 2 . In all other cases he strictly prefers one alternative and therefore chooses this alternative. With this consumer strategy, game Γ(µ) satisfies Reny's better-reply se- cure condition [30] for any µ ∈ [0, 1]. Theorem 3.1 in [30] thus guarantees the existence of a mixed subgame perfect equilibrium in Γ(µ). 9The omitted proofs are available from the authors upon request. Although we have not written a rigorous proof for the case where firms are farsighted, we believe that the results carry through. 17 5.2 Monopolistic Market A natural question to ask is what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for asymptotic learning when there is a single firm that competes against an outside option. It turns out that the vanishing likelihood condition plays a crucial role in the monopolistic case as well. More precisely, consider a monopolistic model with a single firm and a binary state space. In state ω = 0 the firm offers a high-quality product (the common value is one) whereas in the other state (ω = 1) the common value is zero. At each stage the firm sets a price and a new consumer arrives. The consumer receives a private signal and chooses whether or not to buy the good (the outside option is valued at zero). The methodology and techniques discussed in this paper may be used to show that in the monopolistic setting, vanishing likelihood guarantees asymptotic learning and the lack of vanishing likelihood (at both ends) implies that asymptotic learning fails.10 5.3 Social Welfare The main goal of this paper is to identify the informational structure that guarantees learning. As we now turn to show, in our model, learning guar- antees that eventually all agents purchase the superior product. This im- plies that vanishing likelihood is a necessary and sufficient condition for the market to be (asymptotically) efficient.11 Corollary 2. Let (σ, τ 0, τ 1) be a myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium. asymptotic learning holds, then conditional on state ω ∈ Ω, If lim t→∞ P(σ,τ 0,τ 1)({σt(µt, s, τ (µt)) = ω}ω) = 1. The corollary follows from the proof of our main theorem and its proof is relegated to Appendix D. 5.4 Rate of Convergence A natural question to ask is, in cases where asymptotic learning holds, how fast does the market reach a situation where the consumer buys the superior 10Formally, the notion of vanishing likelihood is related to two conditions on the signal struc- ture, that correspond to the two extreme values: the highest and lowest possible signals. Indeed, if one of these conditions fails then learning fails in the duopolistic setting. By contrast, in the monopolistic setting failure of learning is guaranteed only when both conditions are not satisfied. 11In some variants of the herding model, such as those studied in by Mueller-Frank [26, 27], learning does not entail market efficiency. 18 product with high probability. In the herding model, this question has only recently received attention (see, e.g., Rosenberg and Vieille [31] and Hann- Caruthers et al. [20]). In particular, Rosenberg and Vieille [31] demonstrate a sharp negative result showing that for "reasonable" unbounded signals, the expectation of the first correct decision by a consumer, is infinite. In our setting we conjecture that under vanishing likelihood breaking bad herds is faster and thus the rate of convergence is higher. We leave this interesting question for future research. 6 Case Studies An intriguing application of our theoretical results relates the outcome of the evolutionary process of Schumpeterian growth. One particular interest (and concern) is a corollary of our main theorem. Our main theorem as- serts that whenever one firm is sufficiently a-priori advantageous (i.e. the public belief from the outset is that it has the superior product with high probability), it can use predatory pricing to obstruct the entry of entrants yielding innovative substitute products and technologies. In fact, when- ever the demand side does not exhibit the vanishing likelihood property, predatory pricing will eventually become the incumbent's optimal strategy. Recent technological advances had led to an increase in the number and complexity of proposed innovations [29]. The rise of the Internet increased the exposure to new products and the pace at which adoption decisions are made. Social networks inform potential consumers over the action taken by their predecessors, therefore we suspect that such an advantage is quite typical. We illustrate the outcome of our model using two case studies. In one case, which fits the vanishing likelihood requirements, the incumbent in- deed priced out a substitute product, considered by many in hindsight as the superior product. In the other, which fits the opposite scenario, the in- cumbent did not engage in predatory pricing and indeed the new product, which is obviously the superior one, prevailed. Given our informal discussion and the underlying assumptions we put forward for these two cases, in particular with respect to the prevalence of (or lack thereof) vanishing likelihood, we recommend to read them with a grain of salt. In addition, even if one agrees with our assumptions one can suggest alternative explanations to account for the different incumbent reaction in both cases (some of which we mention in footnotes). A tale of vanishing likelihood: In the mid-1990s, with around 10 per- cent market share, Barnes and Noble (BN) was a clear leader in the US 19 book-selling market [16, 18]. BN rose to power by perfecting the shopping experience for buyers and through aggressive discounts, of 20 − 30 percent of cover prices [19]. In 1995 BN faced a new type of competition: Amazon's online retail. In hindsight this is a classic example of "creative destruction"; however, back then the success of online retail was ambiguous. In the late 90s the Internet was new and was definitely not conceived as a retail shopping channel [13]. Uncertainty about the security of online payments was immense [35, 14] and many considered instant gratification, absent from online shopping, as central to the shopping experience. To overcome these challenges, Amazon offered 40 percent discounts of cover prices, while BN maintained its 20 -- 30 percent discount. Early adopters of the new technology started shopping online, followed by more conservative shoppers. Fourteen years later Amazon was a clear market leader while BN closed most of its shops. With a 16.5% market share and over $400B in trade in the 2016 US market [28], online retail shopping is a proven superior innovation. We note that BN, with its 28 percent operational profitability at the time [11], could have lowered prices and driven Amazon out of the market. Was it rational to maintain its high profit or should BN have offered additional discounts given the information available at the time? We shall revisit this issue after the next case study. A tale of non-vanishing likelihood: In the game console market, the quality of a product is determined by a variety of measurable determinants (e.g., graphic capabilities, CPU speed, RAM) and unmeasurable ones (e.g., design, gameplay, and game titles). Back in the late 1990s, game consoles offered no connected gaming and so network effects and externalities were less significant in console adoption.12 The Dreamcast game console, developed at the end of the 1990s, was Sega's second attempt to restore its place as an industry leader.13 The In market leader at the time was Sony with its PlayStation I console. 12One may still claim that network effect played an important role in "Dreamcast" failure. One of the authors, a enthusiastic 'gamer' at the time Sega launched the Dreamcast, contend this network effect for the following reasons: (1) "Sega" was a veteran game manufacturer, which held the intellectual property rights for various strong titles such as: "Golden axe", "Zelda", "Sonic" etc. These titles where not available to "Sony". ;and (2) Sony's next console, the "Playstation II", did not reach the market until the following year and was known to offer no backward compatibility. Therefore it is unclear which of the firms enjoyed a stronger the network effect. 13Sega's previous console, the "Saturn," had failed miserably due to its "awful gameplay and inferior design" [37]. 20 contrast with BN's strategy of ignoring Amazon, Sony preempted the launch of Dreamcast by offering a 30 percent discount on its own console a month before the release of Dreamcast and one year before releasing its own next- gen product [36, 38]. As a result, Dreamcast did not manage to penetrate the market and Sega stopped making and selling this console less than two years after its introduction.14 In retrospect, Dreamcast was acknowledged as the superior technology and some even consider it one of the best consoles ever developed. This rea- sonably priced and developer-friendly technology contained many futuristic features such as "network gameplay" and 64-bit high resolution graphics.15 Some of these novel features did not reach the market until more than half a decade later.16 In Schumpeter's framework, growth had been delayed. Vanishing vs. non-vanishing likelihood: Why did the incumbent firm price aggressively, thus interfering with the evolutionary process, in one case and not in the other? What is the primary distinction that explains this? One explanation that resonates with our model has to do with the different nature of the demand side of both markets. Buyers of game consoles are highly engaged and actively seek information regarding new releases and so we witness more diverse opinions by buyers and a substantial propor- tion of nonconformism. By contrast, book buyers, who do show interest and are engaged when it comes to the decision of which title to buy, are less inquisitive when it comes to the actual shopping experience. Only a marginal proportion would not conform to traditional shopping practices. Thus the marginal proportion of nonconformists, captured by our notion of vanishing likelihood, is significant in the console market and is insignificant in the book market.17 For Sony it was rational to reduce prices in order to maintain the nonconformist market share. For BN, on the other hand, the size of the nonconformist market share coupled with the ambiguity of 14Indeed, Tadashi Takezaki, a former executive at Sega, points out two main factors related to the failure of Dreamcast: (1) Consumer skepticism about Sega's abilities to produce a viable product following the aforementioned "Saturn" fiasco and (2) Sony's aggressive pricing [17]. 15Even today, over a decade and a half after its initial release, second-hand consoles are being traded on eBay and new Dreamcast titles are being released [12], which serves as a testimony to the console's technical superiority. 16Online multiplayer interface was introduced by PlayStation III in 2006, the same year a control system with motion detection first appeared in the Nintendo Wii. 17An alternative explanation may be that demand for most products is likely to be multi- dimensional. We argue that in these two cases studies, pricing plays a major part in the con- sumer's decision. In the Amazon case, consumer price sensitivity played a major part in the raise of the book-superstores. It is therefore only logical to assume that it was also meaningful in their demise. In the gaming console example, the majority of potential consumers at the time were not the gamers themselves, but their parents, which were more price sensitive (see [17]). 21 the success of the new online shopping paradigm was insufficient to forego profits.18 7 Summary In the classic models of social learning, the consumers' utility from each alternative is fixed. Thus, when signals are bounded, there is always a pos- itive probability that the inferior product will prevail [6, 8]. However, when signals are unbounded there are always nonconformist consumers who go against the herd and purchase the product most others won't (see Smith and Sørensen [34]). These nonconformists are instrumental for the afore- mentioned information aggregation when the consumers' choice is between products with fixed prices. However, our setting involves strategic pricing that alters these results. As each of the firms can now lower its price and attract consumers, even when the prior belief is biased against it, or price out its competitor if the prior belief is in its favor. We ask two questions: When are these pricing strategies optimal? And what implications do these strategies have for the manner in which markets aggregate information? We find that the proportion of nonconformist consumers plays a significant role in answering these questions. An intuitive extension of the model with fixed prices suggests that more nonconformists implies more social learning. However, our main finding is the exact opposite: social learning occurs only when the number of nonconformist consumers is small. This is the condition we refer to as "vanishing likelihood." We study the conditions under which markets in which firms are en- gaged in a pricing competition enable or hinder social learning. We do so by introducing a simple setting of duopolistic pricing competition. We first study a simplified model where firms are myopic and prove that in this setting, when signals are bounded, social learning occurs if and only if the signal distributions exhibit the vanishing likelihood property. We then ex- tend these results to a version of the model with forward-looking firms that maximize their expected discounted future revenue stream. The rationale behind this counterintuitive result is uncovered when an- alyzing the firms' incentives in the stage game. As society learns, one of the firms, say Firm 0, emerges as the better one. At that stage the new con- sumer, prior to receiving a signal, assigns a high probability to Firm 0 having 18One could suggest that the nonconformism of the game console market is captured by the notion of unbounded signals whereas the book market exhibits bounded signals. Adopting this approach must lead to the conclusion that creative destruction would be observed in the console market and not in the book market, contrary to the evidence. 22 the superior product. In other words, the stage game begins with a biased prior toward Firm 0, which now wants to exploit this near-monopolistic status and set a high price. The only reason not to do so is when the next consumer is very likely to receive a strong signal that Firm 1 is superior and consequently does not conform with his predecessors. This argument can be ignored by Firm 0 when the probability of this event is low enough, which is exactly captured by our notion of "vanishing likelihood." Therefore, when signals exhibit vanishing likelihood, the popular firm ignores nonconformist consumers and foregoes this market share by setting prices high. Firm 1 sets prices low and wins over the consumer in the rare event that he is a nonconformist, thus breaking the herd phenomenon. Notice that no matter how small the probability of this is in the stage game, when we go back to the repeated game it eventually happens with probability one. While our major contribution is to the literature on social learning, the vanishing likelihood property and its effect on firms' strategic behavior has interesting implications for market behavior. In particular for market entry and the adoption of new technologies. Previous work which studied such questions assumed that incumbents have, either an informational advantage (see [5]) or the "first move" advantage and can preempt entry by increasing capacity or investing in R&D ([1, 7]) or both (see [23, 24]). To the best of our knowledge, our stage game is the first example of predatory pricing behavior, when both incumbent and entrant act simultaneously, and no firm has an informational advantage. We study these aspects in a companion paper (Arieli et al. [3]). In addition to the theoretical contribution of the paper, we believe that the intuition uncovered in our model merits further discussion and may pave the way to subsequent work in related fields. For example, a stylized version of the model may be used to examine questions of firm pricing dynamics, or the interim social cost associated with predatory pricing in experience good markets. Note that the market failure we uncover, can be easily rectified by employing a minimum price policy (Similarly to the policy employed to enable entry to the Israeli communications market [32]). The costs and benefits of such policy are left for follow-up work. Another potential direction may be an empirical examination of technol- ogy adoption success and failures. While it may be difficult to directly as- certain whether a distribution satisfies the "vanishing likelihood property", it is possible to examine whether a large proportion of non-conformists aids or obstructs the process of innovation adoptions (similarly to [22]). 23 References [1] Daron Acemoglu and Dan Cao. Innovation by entrants and incum- bents. Journal of Economic Theory, 157:255 -- 294, 2015. [2] Daron Acemoglu, Munther A. Daleh, Ilan Lobel, and Asuman Ozdaglar. Bayesian Learning in Social Networks. Review of Economic Studies, 78:1201 -- 1236, 2011. [3] Itai Arieli, Moran Koren, and Rann Smorodinsky. Predatory Pric- ing and Information Aggregation in Markets with a Common Value. Available at SSRN 2825009, 2016. [4] Christopher Avery and Peter Zemsky. Multidimensional Uncertainty and Herd Behavior in Financial Markets. The American Economic Review, 88(4):724 -- 748, 1998. [5] Kyle Bagwell. Signalling and entry deterrence: a multidimensional analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(3):670 -- 697, 2007. [6] Av Banerjee. A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3):797 -- 817, 1992. [7] Alex Barrachina, Yair Tauman, and Amparo Urbano. Entry and espi- onage with noisy signals. Games and Economic Behavior, 83:127 -- 146, 2014. [8] Sushil Bikhchandani, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cas- cades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5):992 -- 1026, 1992. [9] Subir Bose, Gerhard Orosel, Marco Ottaviani, and Lise Vesterlund. Dynamic monopoly pricing and herding. The RAND Journal of Eco- nomics, 37(4):910 -- 928, 2006. [10] Subir Bose, Gerhard Orosel, Marco Ottaviani, and Lise Vesterlund. Monopoly Pricing in the Binary Herding Model. Economic Theory, 37(2):203 -- 241, 2008. [11] Katrina Brooker. Beautiful Dreamer Jeff Bezos has slashed costs, im- posed discipline, and worked like hell to turn Amazon into a lean, efficient retailer. Yet he still wants investors to see his company as something more, as the paragon company of the Internet revolution., 2000. [12] Tim Brooks. Did You Know The Sega Dreamcast Still Gets New Re- leases?, 2016. [13] Kim Cleland. WEB LACKS TRANSACTIONS, BUT INFLUENCES DECISIONS -- News - AdAge. AdvertisingAge, apr 1995. 24 [14] Brad C. Crisp, Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, and Peter A. Todd. Individual Dif- ferences and Internet Shopping Attitudes and Intentions. Information research : an international electronic journal., 1995. [15] Darrell Duffie, Semyon Malamud, and Gustavo Manso. Information Journal of Economic Theory, Percolation in Segmented Markets. 153(1):1 -- 32, 2014. [16] Pankaj Ghemawat. Leadership Online (A): Barnes & Noble vs. Ama- zon.com. Harvard Business School Cases, 44(0):19, 2004. [17] Kevin Gifford. Why did the Dreamcast fail? Sega's marketing veteran looks back, 2013. [18] Albert N Greco. The book publishing industry. Routledge, 2013. [19] William Grimes. Book War: Shops vs. Superstores; As Chains Grow, Struggling Small Stores Stress Expertise, 1995. [20] Wade Hann-Caruthers, Vadim V. Martynov, and Omer Tamuz. The speed of sequential asymptotic learning. Journal of Economic Theory, 173:383 -- 409, jan 2018. [21] Helios Herrera and Johannes Horner. Biased Social Learning. Games and Economic Behavior, 80:131 -- 146, 2013. [22] Thomas Klier and Joshua Linn. The effect of vehicle fuel economy stan- dards on technology adoption. Journal of Public Economics, 133:41 -- 63, 2016. [23] Paul Milgrom and John Roberts. Limit Pricing and Entry under Incom- plete Information : An Equilibrium Analysis. Econometrica, 50(2):443 -- 459, 1982. [24] Paul Milgrom and John Roberts. Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2):280 -- 312, 1982. [25] Giuseppe Moscarini and Marco Ottaviani. ECONOMIC MODELS OF SOCIAL LEARNING. In Decisions, Games and Markets., pages 265 -- 298. Springer US., 1997. [26] Manuel Mueller-frank. Market Power, Fully Revealing Prices and Wel- fare. 2012. [27] Manuel Mueller-frank. Price Effieciency and Welfare. 2016. [28] National Retail Federation. National Retail Federation Forecasts Hol- iday Sales to Increase 3.6% -- National Retail Federation, 2016. [29] OECD. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. OECD Publish- ing, oct 2015. 25 [30] Philip J. Reny. On the Existence of Pure and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibria in Discontinuous Games. Econometrica, 67(5):1029 -- 1056, 1999. [31] Dinah Rosenberg and Nicolas Vieille. On the Efficiency of Social Learn- ing. Working paper, nov 2017. [32] Steven Scheer. Israel shakes up telecoms market to lower prices for consumers -- Reuters. reuters, 2014. [33] Joseph A Schumpeter. Capitalism , Socialism & Democracy. Harper & Brothers, 1942. [34] B Y Lones Smith and Peter Sørensen. Pathological Outcomes of Ob- servational Learning. Econometrica, 68(2):371 -- 398, 2000. [35] Russell G Smith. PAYING THE PRICE ON THE INTERNET: FUNDS TRANSFER CRIME IN CYBERSPACE. In Internet Crime, Melbourne, 1998. the Australian Institute of Criminology. [36] James Snodgrass. BBC News -- Sci/Tech -- Sega Dreamcast to spark price war, 1999. [37] The Video Game Critic'. The Video Game Critic's Sega Saturn Console Review page. [38] Wikia. Video Game Sales Wiki - Price cuts, 2017. A Proofs of the Stage Game A.1 Equilibrium Analysis of Γ(µ) We start with some preliminary results concerning equilibrium behavior in the game Γ(µ). Throughout we use the notation φi ∈ ∆([0, 1]) for a mixed strategy of Firm i and τi for a pure strategy. For µ ∈ [0, 1] we use the following shorthand: Gµ(x) = µG0(x) + (1 − µ)G1(x). It follows by equation (7) that whenever the consumer's strategy σ obeys equation (5), the expected utility of Firm 0 in the game Γ(µ), Π0(τ0, τ1, σ), can be written as follows: Π0(τ0, τ1, σ) = (1 − Gµ(vµ(τ0, τ1)))τ0. (9) For a mixed strategy profile (φ0, φ1), let φ ∈ ∆([0, 1]× [0, 1]) be the price probability distribution (φ0, φ1) induced over [0, 1] × [0, 1]. By equation (9), Firm 0's payoff from the mixed strategy profile (φ0, φ1) can be written as 26 follows: Π0(φ0, φ1, σ) = Π0(φ0, φ1) = Z (cid:0)µ(1 − G0(vµ(τ0, τ1) + (1 − µ)(1 − G1(vµ(τ0, τ1))(cid:1)τ0dφ(τ0, τ1), (10) where vµ(·, ·) is defined as equation (6). The next lemma provides an alternative way to write vµ(τ0, τ1) and its derivative. This will turn out to be useful in the sequel. Consider the following function ¯vµ : [0, 1]2 → R : ¯vµ(τ0, τ1) ≡   2 2 log( 1− log( τ0 1−τ0 Lemma 1. It holds that 1+τ0−τ 1 1+τ0−τ 1 ) − log( µ 1−µ )] if the market is full, ) − log( µ 1−µ ) if the market is not full. ∂¯vµ(τ ) ∂τ0 τ ∗(µ) =   2 1−(τ0−τ1)2 if the market is full, τ0(1−τ0) if the market is not full 1 ∂vµ(τ ) ∂τ0 = e¯vµ(τ0,τ1) ∂¯vµ(τ0, τ1) (1 + e¯vµ(τ ))2 ∂τ0 . and (11) (12) (13) Proof. The proof makes standard use of the log-likelihood ratio transfor- mation (see, e.g., Smith and Sørensen [34], Herrera and Hørner [21], and Duffie et al. [15]). The log-likelihood ratio of a belief p ∈ [0, 1] is given by log( p 1−p ). In particular, the log likelihood ratio of the posterior belief is log( pµ(s) 1 − pµ(s) ) = log( µ 1 − µ ) + log( p(s) 1 − p(s) ). (14) It follows from equation (6) that a consumer with private belief pµ(s) prefers Firm 0 if and only if log( pµ(s) 1 − pµ(s) ) ≥ log( vµ(τ ) 1 − vµ(τ0, τ1) ) = ¯vµ(τ0, τ1). Equation (13) then follows directly from the fact that vµ(τ ) = e¯vµ(τ ) 1+e¯vµ(τ ) . A simple lemma that turns out be useful in our analysis is the following: Observation 3. Let µ ∈ [0, 1] and let (φ0, φ1) be a SPE of Γ(µ). The following properties hold: φ0([2 αµ − 1, 1]) = 1 and φ1([1 − 2¯αµ, 1]) = 1. ¯ 27 Proof. We prove the observation for Firm 0. Note that if 2 we have 2 ; in this case we have that if τ0 = nothing to prove. Assume that αµ − 1, then the consumer will buy from Firm 0 with probability one for 2 ¯ almost every signal realization s and every price τ1 ≥ 0 of Firm 1. To see this, note that pµ(s) > αµ for almost every signal s ∈ S. Therefore, ¯ αµ > 1 ¯ αµ ≤ 1 ¯ pµ(s) − (2 αµ − 1) > 1 − pµ(s). ¯ This shows that for a price τ0 = 2 probability one even for τ1 = 0. In particular, under any price τ0 ≤ 2 the expected profit of Firm 0 is τ0. Therefore, if 2 the price 2 strictly dominates all prices τ0 < 2 αµ−1 the consumer buys from Firm 0 with ¯ αµ − 1 ¯ αµ − 1 ¯ αµ > 1 ¯ αµ − 1 for Firm 0. ¯ A.2 Properties of Deterrence Equilibria A key property of a deterrence equilibrium is given in the following lemma. Lemma 2. Let (φ0, φ1) be a deterrence equilibrium in the game Γ(µ). If 2 . Symmetrically, if Firm 1 controls Firm 0 controls the market, then the market then ¯αµ ≤ 1 2 . αµ ≥ 1 ¯ In words, if Firm i is driven out of the market (in the sense that the consumer surely does not buy from it) it must be the case that the con- sumer's posterior belief assigns a probability of at most 1 2 that Firm i is the superior firm. Proof. Assume to the contrary that 2 and that (φ0, φ1) is a deter- rence equilibrium in which Firm 1 is deterred. In this case Π1(φ0, φ1) = 0. Consider a deviation of Firm 1 to the pure strategy τ1 = 1−2 αµ 2 > 0. By ¯ equation (5) we can conclude that any consumer whose signal falls in the 4 )} will choose Firm 1 with probability set {s ∈ Spµ(s) ∈ [ one for any equilibrium strategy φ0 for Firm 0. αµ αµ + ¯ ¯ 2 + 1 αµ < 1 ¯ αµ, ¯ Note that the set {s ∈ Spµ(s) ∈ [ αµ + ε)} has positive probability ¯ for every ε > 0 and in particular for ε = 4 . Therefore this deviation entails a positive expected utility for Firm 1 and hence a profitable deviation, thus contradicting the equilibrium assumption. αµ αµ + ¯ ¯ 2 + 1 αµ, ¯ Given a deterrence equilibrium, there is always a unique price for the firm that controls the market. The price of the firm that controls the market is determined such that its least favorable consumer becomes indifferent between buying from the dominant firm or receiving the other firm's product for free. Thus, under deterrence equilibrium the consumer buys from the dominant firm with probability one. 28 Proposition 1. If (φ0, φ1) is a deterrence equilibrium in game Γ(µ), then φ0 = 2 αµ − 1 and Π0(φ0, φ1) = 2 ¯ αµ − 1 if ¯ αµ ≥ ¯ φ1 = 1 − 2¯αµ and Π0(φ0, φ1) = 1 − 2¯αµ if ¯αµ ≤ 1 2 1 2 . αµ ≥ 1 ¯ 2 (By Lemma 2). It follows from Observation 3 that φ0([2 Proof. Let us assume without loss of generality that Firm 1 is deterred and so αµ − ¯ αµ − 1 + δ, 1] > 0 for 1, 1]) = 1. Assume by way of contradiction that φ0[2 ¯ some positive δ > 0 and consider the price τ1 = δ 2 for Firm 1 (the deterred αµ − 1 + δ, 1], any consumer with firm). In this case, for any realized τ0 ∈ [2 ¯ a private signal s such that pµ(s) ∈ [ 4 ], an event whose probability is positive, will buy from Firm 1, which, in turn, will have a positive utility. In the deterrence equilibrium Firm 1's utility is obviously zero and hence the price τ1 = δ 2 constitutes a profitable deviation, thus contradicting the equilibrium assumption. Therefore φ0[2 αµ − 1 + δ, 1] = 0 for any δ > 0. ¯ Hence Firm 0 plays τ0 = 2 αµ − 1 with probability one, as claimed. ¯ αµ, ¯ αµ + δ ¯ By Lemma 2, the condition 2 is necessary in order for a deterrence equilibrium (in which Firm 1 is deterred) to exist. We now turn to study the implications of this condition. αµ ≥ 1 ¯ Lemma 3. If (φ0, φ1) is a non-deterrence Bayesian Nash SPE of Γ(µ), then the following conditions hold: φ0((2 αµ − 1, 1)) > 0, Π0(φ0, φ1, σ) ≥ ¯ 2 αµ−1, and Π1(φ0, φ1) > 0. Symmetrically for Firm 1, φ1((1−2¯αµ, 1)) > 0, ¯ Π1(φ0, φ1, σ) ≥ 1 − 2¯αµ, and Π0(φ0, φ1) > 0. Proof. We prove the first part of the lemma. Lemma 3 implies that φ0([2 αµ− ¯ 1, 1]) = 1. We further note that if (φ0, φ1) is a SPE profile for which φ0 is the Dirac measure on 2 αµ − 1, which means ¯ that the consumer buys from Firm 0 with probability 1. Hence such an equilibrium must be a deterrence equilibrium. Therefore, it must hold that φ0((2 αµ − 1, then Π0(φ0, φ1) = 2 ¯ αµ − 1, 1)) > 0. ¯ The fact that Π1(φ0, φ1) > 0 follows since, as in the proof of Proposition αµ −1, 1)) > 0, then Firm 1 can guarantee a positive payoff against ¯ 1, if φ0((2 φ0. B Proof of Theorem 2 Unbounded signals We begin the proof of Theorem 2, by studying the case of unbounded signals, α = 0 and ¯α = 1. The following corollary shows that whenever i.e., where ¯ 29 signals are unbounded there can not be a deterrence equilibrium. In fact all equilibria are non-deterrence equilibria. Corollary 3. If signals are unbounded then there are no deterrence equi- libria in Γ(µ). Proof. Since ¯α = 0 and now follows from Lemma 2. α = 1 it follows that ¯ αµ = 0 and ¯αµ = 1. The proof ¯ Bounded signals with vanishing likelihood α, ¯α ∈ (0, 1), and We now consider the case where signals are bounded, i.e., ¯ signals exhibit the vanishing likelihood property, i.e., g1( α) = 0. In the ¯ following lemma we show that the vanishing likelihood property also yields that g0( α) = 0. ¯ Lemma 4. If the signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits vanishing likelihood then g0( α) = 0. ¯ Proof. Since vanishing likelihood holds we have that g1( to the contrary that g1( α) = 0. Assume ¯ α). Since F0, F1 are absolutely mutually ¯ α + ¯ α + ε). This stands in contradiction to Lemma 10 in Appendix D, ¯ continuous, there exists ε such that R ¯ ε) > G1( which shows that G0 first order stochastically dominates G1. g1(s)ds ⇒ G0( α) < g0( ¯ α+ε α ¯ g0(s)ds > R ¯ α+ε α ¯ The second part of Theorem 2 is proved in the following proposition. Proposition 2. If the signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits vanishing likeli- hood, then for every µ ∈ (0, 1) there is no deterrence equilibrium in Γ(µ). Proof. Without loss of generality assume that µ ∈ ( 1 2 , 1) and assume to the contrary that there exists a deterrence equilibrium in Γ(µ). By Lemma 2, the only possible deterrence equilibrium is one in which Firm 1 is deterred αµ − 1, φ1). Therefore, and by Proposition 1 it must take the form of (2 ¯ αµ − 1. We first claim that it is sufficient to show that Π0(2 ¯ αµ − 1, φ1) = 2 ¯ Π0(2 αµ − 1 + ε, 0) − Π0(2 ¯ αµ − 1, 0) > 0 ¯ (15) αµ − 1, φ1) = 2 ¯ for some ε > 0. To see this, note that Π0(2 αµ − 1 for any ¯ mixed strategy φ1 of Firm 1. In addition, for any fixed price τ0 of Firm 0 the payoff Π0(τ0, τ1) is (weakly) decreasing in τ1. Therefore, the inequality in (15) implies that Π0(2 αµ − 1 for any mixed strategy ¯ φ1 of Firm 1. Therefore, if 2 αµ − 1 + ε yields a profitable deviation to Firm ¯ 0 against price τ1 = 0 it also yields a profitable deviation with respect to any strategy φ1 of Firm 1. αµ − 1 + ε, φ1) > 2 ¯ 30 To establish equation (15) note that ∂Π0(τ0, 0) ∂τ0 τ0=2 αµ−1 = ¯ 1 − (2 αµ − 1)(cid:18) ∂vµ(τ0, 0) ∂τ0 ¯ 2 αµ−1(cid:19) (µg0( ¯ α) + (1 − µ)g1( ¯ α)) . ¯ (16) Since vanishing likelihood holds, by Lemma 4 we have that g1( α) = 0. Therefore equation (16) implies that ¯ g0( α) = ¯ ∂Π0(τ0, 0) ∂τ0 τ0=2 αµ−1 = 1. ¯ Hence Π0(2 αµ − 1 + ε, 0) − Π0(2 ¯ αµ − 1, 0) > 0 for all sufficiently small ε > 0. ¯ If a deterrence equilibrium does not exist then at each stage of our se- quential setting the actual action of the consumer will give us additional in- formation and the public belief will shift. Intuitively, this drives the learning result. However, it turns out that this is not enough. Herrera and Hørner [21] show that in the herding model the fact that µt 6= µt+1 with probability one does not imply that asymptotic learning holds. In order to establish asymptotic learning the following stronger result is required. Lemma 5. If the signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits the vanishing likeli- hood condition or signals are unbounded, then for every ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that if µ ∈ [ǫ, 1 − ǫ] and φ = (φ0, φ1, σ) is a SPE of Γ(µ), then Pµ,φ(σ(τ0, τ1, s) = a) ≤ 1 − δ for any Firm i = 0, 1. Note that Lemma 5 subsumes Proposition 2 in that under vanishing likelihood, a deterrence equilibrium does not exist. This applies that there exists an upper bound on the probability that the consumer buys from any given firm. This in turn implies that if µ is bounded away from zero and one, then the distance between µ and the posterior probability, conditional on the action of the current consumer, is bounded away from zero. Proof. We prove the lemma under the assumption that the signal structure (F0, F1, S) exhibits vanishing likelihood. The proof for the unbounded case is similar and therefore omitted. Assume by way of contradiction that there exists an ǫ > 0 and a sequence of SPE φk = (φk 0, φk 1, σk) of Γ(µk) such that µk ≤ 1 − ǫ and lim k→∞ Pµk,φk (σk(τ0, τ1, s) = 0) = 1. In words, as k increases, the prior approaches 1. We show that this entails that the probability of the consumer buying from Firm 0 approaches 1 as well. 31 We can clearly assume (possibly by considering subsequences) that the k=1 converges. Similarly, we can assume that k=1 converges to some (φ0, φ1, µ).19 As limk→∞ Pµk,φk(σk(a = sequence {Πω(φk {(φk 0)) = 1, the limit profit of Firm 1 shrinks to zero: 1, µk)}∞ 1, σk)}∞ 0 , φk 0 , φk lim k→∞ Π1(φk 0, φk 1, σk) = 0. αµ, ¯ 1 = η It follows that the limit price of Firm 0, limk→∞ φk αµ − 1. To see this consider the case where φ0((2 ¯ 0, is the pure deterrence αµ − 1 + η, 1)) > 0 price 2 ¯ for some η > 0. In this case Firm 1 play τ ′ 2 in Γ(µ) and guarantee a positive profit against φ0. Since in this case the consumers for which αµ + δ pµ(s) ∈ [ 4 ) will strictly prefer to buy from Firm 1. Thus, at the ¯ 1 = η constant price of τ ′ 2 Firm 1 can guarantee a positive expected payoff that is bounded away from zero, for all sufficiently large k. Consider the game Γ(µk) and the strategy profile (φk αµk − ¯ 0, φk 1). A standard continuity consideration implies that since φk = (φk 1) 1, µk) = (φ0, φ1, µ), it holds that (φ0, φ1) αµ −1, ¯ 1, φk is a SPE of Γ(µk) and limk→∞(φk is a SPE of Γ(µ). Therefore (φ0, φ1) = (2 the consumer buys from Firm 0 with probability one. αµ −1, φ1). Under the price 2 ¯ 1) = (2 0 , φk 0 , φk This yields that (φ0, φ1) is a deterrence equilibrium of Γ(µ), which stands in contradiction to Proposition 1. We get the following corollary of Lemma 5. Corollary 1. If signals exhibit vanishing likelihood or if signals are un- α and δ′ > 0 such that bounded, then for every ε > 0 there exists some r > ¯ if µ ∈ [ε, 1 − ε] and φ = (φ0, φ1) is a SPE of Γ(µ), then Pµ,φ(vµ(τ0, τ1) ≥ r) > δ′. A similar condition holds for Firm 1. Bounded signals without vanishing likelihood The following lemma shows that the consumer's threshold signal approaches the lower bound α as µ approaches 1 in every SPE. ¯ Lemma 6. Let {µk}∞ 1. Let φk = (φk holds for every ǫ > 0 : 0, φk k=1 ⊆ (0, 1) be a sequence of priors such that limk→∞ µk = 1 , σk) be a SPE for the game Γ(µk). Then the following 19The convergence of φk limk→∞Pµk,φk(vµk (τ0, τ1) ∈ [ ω is assumed with respect to the weak topology. α + ǫ]) = 1. ¯ α, ¯ 32 Proof. Assume by way of contradiction that there exists some ǫ0 > 0 and δ > 0 for which the following holds (possibly considering a subsequence): limk→∞Pµk,φk(vµk (τ0, τ1) ∈ [ α, ¯ α + ǫ]) < 1 − δ. ¯ This implies that the payoff to Firm 0 is at most 1 − δG0( α + ǫ0) < 1. To ¯ see this note that with a probability of at least δ > 0 it holds for sufficiently α + ǫ. Therefore, with probability at least δ the large k that vµk (τ0, τ1) > ¯ profit of Firm 0 is bounded by 1−G0( α+ǫ0). Therefore, the expected profit ¯ of Firm 0 is bounded by δ(1 − G0( α + ǫ0)) + (1 − δ) = 1 − δG0( ¯ α + ǫ0). ¯ Since signals are bounded and limk→∞ µk = 1 it must hold, for suffi- ciently large k, that αµk − 1 > 1 − δG0( 2 ¯ α + ǫ). ¯ In the game Γ(µk), consider a deviation by Firm 0 to the pure price τ0 = αµk − 1. Firm 0 then guarantees an expected revenue of 2 ¯ 2 αµk − 1 > 1 − δG0( ¯ α + ǫ), ¯ which implies a contradiction. The following corollary shows that as µ approaches 1, it holds that for any SPE of Γ(µ), the equilibrium price of Firm 0 approaches 1. Corollary 4. Let {µk}∞ to 1, and let (φk 0, φk k=0 ⊂ (0, 1) be a sequence of priors that converges 1, σk) be a SPE of Γ(µk) for any k. Then, lim k→∞ φk 0 = 1. Corollary 4 follows from Proposition 1 and Lemma 3. The following lemma provides an upper limit to the support of Firm 1 in a non-deterrence equilibrium. Lemma 7. If (φ0, φ1) is a non-deterrence equilibrium, then φ0([2 1, ¯αµ]) = 1 and φ1([1 − 2¯αµ, 1 − αµ − ¯ αµ]) = 1. ¯ Proof. It follows from Proposition 1 that Π0(φ0, φ1) > 0. Note further that for any price τ0 > ¯αµ the consumer would be strictly better off choosing e than buying from Firm 0. Therefore, we must have φ0((¯αµ, 1]) = 0 for otherwise a profitable deviation could have been constructed for Firm 0. 33 Finally, we present a proof of the third part of Theorem 2, which con- siders the case of non-vanishing likelihood. In such a case, whenever the prior is sufficiently biased in favor of one firm, there is a unique equilibrium in which the a priori unfavorable firm is deterred. α) > 0, then ∃¯µ ∈ (0, 1) such that any SPE of Γ(µ) Proposition 3. If g0( ¯ is a deterrence equilibrium for all µ > ¯µ. Symmetrically, if g1(¯α) > 0, then µ ∈ (0, 1) such that any SPE of Γ(µ) is a deterrence equilibrium for all ∃ ¯ µ < µ. ¯ Proof. We prove the first part of the proposition. The proof of the second part follows from symmetric considerations. Assume by way of contradiction that there exists a sequence of priors {µk} such that limk→∞ µk = 1 and a corresponding sequence of SPEs, {(φk 1) is a non-deterrence equilibrium of Γ(µk) for all values of k. k=1, such that φk = (φk 1)}∞ 0 , φk 0 , φk Note that it must be the case that for almost every realized price τ0 (with respect to φk 0) of Firm 0 Π0(τ0, φk 1) = Π0(φk 0, φk 1) (otherwise Firm 0 would have a profitable deviation). 0 be the highest price in the support of φk 0. It follows from the Let τ k above that Π0(τ k 0 , φk 1) = Π0(φk 0, φk 1). (17) 0, φk Since (φk 1, 1]) > 0 for all k ≥ 1. 1) is a non-deterrence equilibrium, Lemma 3 implies that φ0((2 αµk − ¯ Π0(τ k 1) > 0. 0 , τ1) > 1) − Π0(τ k 0 , φk 1(T ) > 0 such that vµk (τ k We next show that for all sufficiently large k there exists ε > 0 such that 0 − ε, φk We claim first that vµk (τ k α for almost every realized τ1 (with ¯ respect to φk 1). Assume that there exists a measurable subset T ⊂ [0, 1] with φk 0 . Since vµk (τ0, τ1) is increasing in τ0 for every fixed τ1, it follows from the definition of τ k 0 that vµk (τ k 0 of Firm 0. Therefore, we must have that the profit to Firm 1, conditional on τ1 ∈ T, is zero. By Lemma 3, Firm 1's expected payoff under φk is strictly positive, and hence we must have a profitable deviation for Firm 1. 0 almost all realized prices τ k α for all τ k ¯ α for φk ¯ 0 , τ1) = 0 , τ1) = 34 Using equation (9) we can write ∂Π0(τ0, φk 1) ∂τ0 τ0=τ k 0 = Z (cid:0)µk(1 − G0(vµk (τ0, τ1) + (1 − µk)(1 − G1(vµk (τ0, τ1))(cid:1)dφk 1(τ1) − τ k 0 (cid:18) ∂vµk (τ0, τ1) ∂τ0 τ k 0(cid:19)(cid:16)µkg0(vµk (τ k 0 , τ1)) + (1 − µ)g1(vµk (τ k 0 , τ1))(cid:17) dφk 1(τ1). Since limk→∞ µk = 1, it follows from Lemma 6 that lim k→∞ Pµk,φk 1 (vµk (τk, τ k 1 ) − α > δ) = 0, ¯ for any δ > 0. (18) Since the signal structure (F0, F1, S) does not exhibit the vanishing like- α) > 0. ¯ α) > 0 and, by Lemma 4, that g0( ¯ lihood property, it follows that g1( Therefore, for some β > 0, lim k→∞ Pµk,φk 1 (µkg0(vµk (τ k 0 , τ1)) + (1 − µk)g1(vµk (τ k 0 , τ1)) > β) = 1. We further note that φk 1([0, 1 − αµk ]) = 1 by Lemma 7. ¯ Since limk→∞ µk = 1 we have that limk→∞ φk 0 = 1. Therefore, limk→∞(τ k 4 implies that limk→∞ τ k 1. Hence equation (11) and equation (12) of Lemma 1 imply that 0 = limk→∞ φk 1 = 0. Moreover, Corollary 1 )2 = 0 − τ k 1 ) lim k→∞(cid:18) ∂vµk (τ0, τ k 1 in the support of φk ∂τ0 0(cid:19) = ∞, τ k (19) for any choice of τ k 1. Therefore, equation (18) implies that ∂Π0(τ0,τ1) τ0=τ k < 0 for all sufficiently large values of k. Hence, in particular, for all sufficiently large values of k there exists a sufficiently small ε > 0 such that ∂τ0 0 Π0(τ k 0 − ε, φk 1) − Π0(τ k 0 , φk 1) > 0. Therefore equation (17) implies that for all sufficiently large k, Firm 0 has a profitable deviation from φk 0. This stands in contradiction to the assumption that (φk 1) is an equilibrium strategy. 0, φk Theorem 2 consolidates Corollary 3, Proposition 2, and Proposition 3. C Proofs for the Farsighted Firms We state some lemmata that will prove useful for obtaining the results for farsighted firms. 35 Lemma 8. 2 tive on [0, 1]. αµ − 1 is a strictly convex function of µ with a bounded deriva- ¯ Proof. Let µ α ¯ − 1. (20) h(µ) = 2 αµ − 1 = 2 ¯ α + (1 − µ)(1 − ¯ The first derivative of h(µ) is h′(µ) = 2(1− α ¯ The second derivative of h(µ) is . This establishes the first claim of the lemma. α) ¯ [µ(2 µ α) ¯ α) ¯ α(1− ¯ 2 α−1)+(1−µ)]2 , which is bounded by ¯ d2h(µ) dµ2 = 4(1 − α) ¯ (µ(1 − 2 α) − (1 − ¯ α(2 ¯ α − 1) ¯ α))3 . ¯ (21) Recall that addition, as µ ≤ 1 we conclude that 1 − α > 1 − 2 ¯ denominator of (21) is also negative. Thus, d2h(µ) strictly convex. α < 0.5 and so the enumerator in equation (21) is negative. In ¯ α) and so the ¯ dµ2 > 0 and so h(µ) must be α ≥ µ(1 − 2 ¯ C.1 Proof of Theorem 3 2 one of the two following events, µ∞ ∈ [ 1 Assume by way contradiction that signals exhibit vanishing likelihood and asymptotic learning fails in some equilibrium ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ). This entails that for some constant 0 < η < 1 2 , 1 − η] or µ∞ ∈ [η, 1 2 ], has positive probability. Let us assume, without loss of generality, that it is the former event. Let r > 0 denote its probability. More formally, if H ′ ⊆ H∞ is the set of all infinite histories for which limt→∞ µt = µ∞ ∈ [ 1 2 , 1 − η] then P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)(H ′) = r > 0. Further note that for P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)-almost every infinite history h ∈ H ′ it must hold that limt→∞ Πδ 1( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) = 0 (ht ∈ Ht is the truncation of h). Using similar arguments to those invoked in the proof of Proposition 1 we conclude that for almost every history h ∈ H ′ it holds that limt→∞ Πδ 2 αµt − 1 = 0. ¯ For every ǫ > 0 let us denote by Hǫ ⊆ H the set of all finite histories for 0( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht)− which Πδ 0( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σht) − 2 αµt − 1 ≤ ǫ. ¯ It follows from the above that for every ǫ > 0, P( ¯φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)(∃t s.t. ht ∈ Hǫ and µt ≤ 1 − η 2 ) ≥ r. As we assume vanishing likelihood, we can invoke Proposition 2 and conclude that there exists sufficiently small ǫ0 > 0 such that whenever µ ≤ 1 − η 2 , Firm 0 has some price τ0 ∈ [0, 1] that guarantees the following stage payoff: Π0(τ0, φ1, µ) > 2 αµ − 1 + ǫ0, ¯ (22) 36 for every strategy φ1 ∈ ∆([0, 1]) of Firm 1. We define the strategy φ0 for Firm 0 as follows. Let h be some finite then set φ0(ht) = τ0, where τ0 is the price that satisfies history. If h ∈ H ǫ0 2 but has some prefix ht ∈ H ǫ0 the inequality in equation (22). If h 6∈ H ǫ0 2 2 αµt+1 −1 (where µt+1 is the public belief at stage t+1). then set the price at 2 ¯ Note that this implies that from stage t + 1 onward Firm 1 is deterred and the public belief remains fixed. Finally, whenever no prefix of h is in H ǫ0 2 let the price be that which was chosen according to the original strategy ¯φ0. The continuation payoff of Firm 0 for any finite history in H ǫ0 2 is (1 − δ)[2 αµt − 1 + ǫ0] + δE( φ0, ¯φ1,¯σ)[2 ¯ αµt+1 − 1ht]. ¯ That is, the current period deviation of Firm 0 yields, by equation (22), an expected payoff of at least 2 αµt − 1 + ǫ0. Thereafter the value of µt+1 ¯ is realized and in all subsequent periods t′ > t Firm 0 receives a constant αµ − 1 is convex (by Lemma 8) this payoff of 2 ¯ continuation payoff is guaranteed to satisfy the following inequality: αµt+1 − 1. As the function 2 ¯ E( φ0, ¯φ1),¯σ[2 αµt+1 − 1ht] ≥ 2 ¯ αµt − 1. ¯ Comparing this with the continuation payoff from the original strategy im- plies that the deviation yields a profit that is at least (1 − δ) ǫ0 2 . This stands in contradiction to the fact that ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) is a Bayesian Nash equilibrium. C.2 Proof of Theorem 4. Assume that the signal structure does not satisfy the vanishing likelihood property and so either g0( α) > 0 or g0(¯α) > 0. Let us assume without loss ¯ of generality that g0( α) > 0. We first prove the following lemma. ¯ Lemma 9. For every discount factor δ ∈ (0, 1) there exists µ′ > 0 such that if µ0 ≥ µ′, then the following strategy is a Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategy of the repeated game with initial prior µ0 and discount factor δ: at every history ht Firm 0 asks a price of 2 αµt − 1 and Firm 1 asks a price 0. ¯ Proof. Firm 0 sets a price of 2 αµt − 1 that necessarily drives Firm 1 out of ¯ the market. Therefore, no matter what price Firm 1 offers it cannot make a positive profit and so no profitable deviation exists for it. To establish the claim we need to show that if µ0 is sufficiently large, then Firm 0 also doesn't have a profitable deviation. To see this, we show next that for a large enough initial prior µ (we omit the subscript 0 that refers to the initial stage), Firm 0 does not have a one-shot profitable deviation given this strategy profile. In fact, it is enough to establish this for the first stage. 37 Whenever Firm 0 increases its price to τ, and the price profile becomes τ = (τ, 0) (clearly decreasing the price is not profitable), there are two possibilities that can happen in the first stage: either the consumer buys from Firm 0, in which case we denote new public belief µ0(µ, τ ), or the consumer buys from Firm 1, in which case we denote new public belief µ1(µ, τ ). With this new notation we formulate the continuation payoff from a one-shot deviation at the first stage, as a function of the new price τ : (1 − δ)(1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0))τ + δ[(1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)))(2 αµ0 (µ,τ ) − 1) + Gµ(vµ(τ, 0))(2 ¯ αµ1 (µ,τ ) − 1)]. ¯ We need to show that for all sufficiently large µ this continuation payoff αµ − 1, for every τ . Equivalently, ¯ is at most the payoff prior to a deviation, 2 we need to show that (1 − δ)[2 αµ − 1 − (1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)))τ ] ≥ ¯ (23) δ[(1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)))(2 αµ0 (µ,τ ) − 2 ¯ αµ) + Gµ(vµ(τ, 0))(2 ¯ αµ1(µ,τ ) − 2 ¯ αµ)] ¯ Using Bayes, rule we infer the following three equalities: 1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)) = µ(cid:18)1 − G0(cid:0)vµ(τ, 0)(cid:1)(cid:19) + (1 − µ)(cid:18)1 − G1(cid:0)vµ(τ, 0)(cid:1)(cid:19), and µ0(µ, τ ) = µ(1 − G0(vµ(τ, 0))) 1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)) , µ1(µ, τ ) = µG0(vµ(τ, 0)) Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)) . A simple calculation yields µ0(µ, τ ) − µ = µ − µ1(µ, τ ) = µ(1 − µ)(G1(vµ(τ, 0)) − G0(vµ(τ, 0))) 1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)) µ(1 − µ)(G1(vµ(τ, 0)) − G0(vµ(τ, 0))) Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)) , . (24) (25) In addition, since the function αµ is convex in µ with a bounded deriva- ¯ tive (by Lemma 8), it is also a Lipschitz function of µ. Therefore, there exists a constant C such that 0 < 2 0 < 2 αµ0(µ,τ ) − 2 ¯ αµ − 2 ¯ αµ ≤ C(µ0(µ, τ ) − µ), ¯ αµ1(µ,τ ) ≤ C(µ − µ1(µ, τ )). ¯ (26) (27) Instead of proving inequality (23), by equations (24), (25), (26), and (27) it is sufficient to prove that for all sufficiently large µ it holds for every 38 τ ∈ [0, 1] that (1 − δ)[2 αµ − 1 + (1 − Gµ(vµ(τ, 0)))τ ] ≥ ¯ [G1(vµ(τ, 0)) − G0(vµ(τ, 0))]δµ(1 − µ)C. (28) Assume by way of contradiction that this is not the case. Then there exists a sequence of priors {µk}∞ k=1 ⊂ (0, 1) with a limit 1 and an appropriate sequence {τk}∞ k=1 of prices such that (1 − δ)[2 αµk − 1 − (1 − Gµk (vµk (τk, 0)))τk] < ¯ [G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0))]δµk(1 − µk)C. (29) Since vµk (τk, 0) > α (for otherwise we have an equality in (29)) we can ¯ rewrite (29) as follows: 2 αµk − 1 − (1 − Gµk (vµk (τk, 0)))τk ¯ G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0)) < δ 1 − δ µk(1 − µk)C. (30) We rearrange (30) and get αµk − 1 − τk 2 ¯ G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0)) + G1(vµk (τk, 0))τk G1(vµk (τk)) − G0(vµk (τk)) < δ 1 − δ µk(1 − µk)C. (31) Clearly, since limk→∞ µk = 1, the limit of the right-hand side of (31) is zero and therefore in order to establish contradiction we show that αµk − 1 − τk 2 ¯ G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0)) + G1(vµk (τk, 0))τk G1(vµk (τk)) − G0(vµk (τk)) (32) is bounded away from zero as k goes to infinity. G1(vµk (τk))τk We claim first that lim inf k→∞ G1(vµk (τk))−G0(vµk (τk)) ≥ 1. To do so we recall equation (29). Note that as k goes to infinity, 1 − µk goes to 0 and so the right-hand side of (29) goes to 0. In addition, limk→∞ 2 αµk − 1 = 1 ¯ and so equation (29) implies that limk→∞(1 − Gµk (vµk (τk, 0)))τk ≥ 1. As both multipliers are in the unit interval this necessarily implies that both approach 1. Therefore, limk→∞ τk = 1 and limk→∞ Gµk (vµk (τk, 0)) = 0. The latter then implies that lim k→∞ vµk (τk, 0) = α. ¯ (33) We note that since vµk (τk, 0) > α, Lemma 10 implies that 1 > G1(vµk (τk))− ¯ G0(vµk (τk)) > 0. Therefore G1(vµk (τk))τkG1(vµk (τk)) − G0(vµk (τk)) ≥ 1. Furthermore, since limk→∞ τk = 1 it holds that lim inf k→∞ G1(vµk (τk))τk G1(vµk (τk)) − G0(vµk (τk)) ≥ 1. (34) 39 Therefore in order to show that the term in equation (32) is bounded away from zero and hence leads to a contradiction, it is sufficient to show that 2 αµk − 1 − τk ¯ G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0)) (35) has a limit 0 as k goes to infinity, which establishes a contradiction. By a standard first-order approximation it follows that for every ǫ > 0 there exists xǫ > α such that for every x ≤ xǫ, ¯ (x − α)[gi( ¯ α) − ǫ] ≤ Gi(x) ≤ (x − ¯ α)[gi( ¯ α) + ǫ]. ¯ Since τk > 2 denominator is positive. We use the approximation to get αµk − 1, the numerator in (35) is negative. By Lemma 10 the ¯ 2 αµk − 1 − τk ¯ G1(v(τk, 0)) − G0(v(τk, 0)) > 2 αµk − 1 − τk ¯ α) − g0( α) + 2ε)(vµk (τk, 0) − ¯ ¯ (g1( α) ¯ . (36) Now recall that vµk (τk, 0)− αµ + 1) for some τk ∈ (2 2 ¯ αµk −1, 0) = v′ α = vµk (τk, 0)−vµk (2 ¯ ¯ αµ − 1, τk). Therefore, ¯ µk (τk, 0)(τk − 2 αµk − 1 − τk ¯ G1(vµk (τk, 0)) − G0(vµk (τk, 0)) > −1 (g1( α) − g0( ¯ α) + 2ε)v′ ¯ . (37) (τk, 0) µk Since τk ∈ (2 αµ − 1, τk) we have that limk→∞ τk = 1. Since Firm 1 offers ¯ its product at price zero, the market is full. Therefore, Lemma 1 implies that limk→∞ v′ µ(τk, 0) = ∞. As a result, (35) approaches zero as k goes to infinity. This establishes a contradiction and concludes the proof of Lemma 9. We now conclude the proof of Theorem 4. Proof of Theorem 4. Fix a discount factor δ ∈ (0, 1). By Lemma 9 there exists a µ′ < 1 such that the strategy where at every history ht Firm 0 asks a price of 2 αµt − 1 and Firm 1 asks a price of 0 is a Bayesian Nash ¯ equilibrium of the game with an initial prior µ0 ≥ µ′. Consider an arbitrary prior µ0. We define a game where whenever µt ≥ µ′ Firm 0 and Firm 1 are constrained to play actions 2 αµt − 1 and 0 respectively with probability one. ¯ It is easy to see that this game possesses a Bayesian equilibrium (¯τ0, ¯τ1, ¯σ). By Lemma 9 this equilibrium is also a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the unconstrained game. Clearly, under ( ¯φ0, ¯φ1, ¯σ) asymptotic learning must fail. This concludes the proof of Theorem 4. 40 D Auxilliary Lemmas Lemma 10. The ratio G1(r) r ∈ ( G0(r) is non-increasing in r and G1(r) G0(r) > 1 for all α, ¯α). In particular, G0 first-order stochastically dominates G1. ¯ Proof. The proof follows from the more general result that appears in Lemma A1 of [2]. Corollary 2. Let (σ, τ 0, τ 1) be a myopic Bayesian Nash equilibrium. asymptotic learning holds, then conditional on state ω ∈ Ω, If lim t→∞ P(σ,τ 0,τ 1)({σt(µt, s, τ (µt)) = ω}ω) = 1. Proof. Without loss of generality assume that the realized state is ω = 0. Since asymptotic learning holds, we have that limt µt = 1 almost surely. By Corollary 6 we have that limt→∞ vµt (τ t 0(µt), τ t 1(µt)) = α. Therefore, ¯ G0(vµt (τ t 0(µt), τ t 1(µt))) = lim t→∞ P(σ,τ 0,τ 1)({σt(µt, s, τ (µt)) = 0}ω = 0) = lim t→∞ G0( α) = 1. ¯ 41
1810.11471	6	1810	2019-11-20T21:23:54	Optimal Incentive Contract with Endogenous Monitoring Technology	[ "econ.TH" ]	Recent technology advances have enabled firms to flexibly process and analyze sophisticated employee performance data at a reduced and yet significant cost. We develop a theory of optimal incentive contracting where the monitoring technology that governs the above procedure is part of the designer's strategic planning. In otherwise standard principal-agent models with moral hazard, we allow the principal to partition agents' performance data into any finite categories and to pay for the amount of information the output signal carries. Through analysis of the trade-off between giving incentives to agents and saving the monitoring cost, we obtain characterizations of optimal monitoring technologies such as information aggregation, strict MLRP, likelihood ratio-convex performance classification, group evaluation in response to rising monitoring costs, and assessing multiple task performances according to agents' endogenous tendencies to shirk. We examine the implications of these results for workforce management and firms' internal organizations.	econ.TH	econ	Optimal Incentive Contract with Endogenous Monitoring Technology Anqi Li∗ Ming Yang† Forthcoming, Theoretical Economics Abstract Recent technology advances have enabled firms to flexibly process and ana- lyze sophisticated employee performance data at a reduced and yet significant cost. We develop a theory of optimal incentive contracting where the moni- toring technology that governs the above procedure is part of the designer's strategic planning. In otherwise standard principal-agent models with moral hazard, we allow the principal to partition agents' performance data into any finite categories and to pay for the amount of information the output signal carries. Through analysis of the trade-off between giving incentives to agents and saving the monitoring cost, we obtain characterizations of optimal mon- itoring technologies such as information aggregation, strict MLRP, likelihood ratio-convex performance classification, group evaluation in response to rising monitoring costs, and assessing multiple task performances according to agents' endogenous tendencies to shirk. We examine the implications of these results for workforce management and firms' internal organizations. Key words: incentive contract; endogenous monitoring technology. JEL codes: D86, M15, M5. ∗Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis. [email protected]. †Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. [email protected]. We thank the coeditor, four anonymous referees, Nick Bloom, George Mailath, Ilya Segal, Chris Shannon, Joel Sobel, Jacob Steinhardt, Bob Wilson and the seminar participants at Caltech, Decentralization Conference 2017, Duke-UNC, Johns Hopkins Carey, Northwestern, Stanford, UCSB, UCSD, U of Chicago and U of Washington for comments and suggestions. Lin Hu and Jessie Li provided generous assistance for the numerical analysis. All errors are our own. 1 1 Introduction Recent technology advances have enabled firms to flexibly process and analyze so- phisticated employee performance data at a reduced and yet significant cost. Speech analytics software, natural language processing tools and cloud-based systems are in- creasingly used to convert hard-to-process contents into succinct and meaningful rat- ings such as "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory" (Murff et al. (2011); Singer (2013); Kaplan (2015)). This paper develops a theory of optimal incentive contracting where the monitoring technology that governs the above procedure is part of the designer's strategic planning. Our research agenda is motivated by the case of call center performance manage- ment reported by Singer (2013). It has long been recognized that the conversations between call center agents and customers contain useful performance indicators such as customer sentiment, voice quality and tone, etc.. Recently, the advent of speech analytics software has finally enabled the processing and analysis of these contents, as well as their conversions into meaningful ratings such as "satisfactory" and "un- satisfactory." On the one hand, running speech analytics software consumes server space and power, and the procedure has been increasingly outsourced to third parties to take advantage of the latest development in cloud computing. On the other hand, managers now have considerable freedom to decide which facets of the customer con- versation to utilize, thanks to the increased availability of products whose specialties range from emotion detection to word spotting. We formalize the flexibility and cost associated with the design and implementa- tion of the monitoring technology in otherwise standard principal-agent models with moral hazard. Specifically, we allow the monitoring technology to partition agents' performance data into any finite categories, at a cost that increases with the amount of information the output signal carries (hereafter monitoring cost). An incentive contract pairs the monitoring technology with a wage scheme that maps realizations of the output signal to different wages. An optimal contract minimizes the sum of expected wage and monitoring cost, subject to agents' incentive constraints. Our main result gives characterizations of optimal monitoring technologies in gen- eral environments, showing that the assignment of Lagrange multiplier-weighted likeli- hood ratios to performance categories is positive assortative in the direction of agent utilities. Geometrically, this means that optimal monitoring technologies comprise 2 convex cells in the space of likelihood ratios or their transformations. This result pro- vides practitioners with the needed formula for sorting employee performance data, and exploiting its geometry yields insights into workforce management and firms' internal organizations. Our proof strategy works directly with the principal's Lagrangian. It handles general situations featuring multiple agents and tasks, in which the direction of sorting vector-valued likelihood ratios is nonobvious a priori. It overcomes the technical challenge whereby perturbations of the sorting algorithm affect wages endogenously through the Lagrange multipliers of agents' incentive constraints, yielding effects that are new and difficult to assess using standard methods. We give three applications of our result. In the single-agent model considered in Holmstrom (1979), we show that the assignment of likelihood ratios to wage categories is positive assortative and follows a simple cutoff rule. The monitoring technology aggregates potentially high-dimensional performance data into rank-ordered ratings, and the output signal satisfies the strict monotone likelihood ratio property with respect to the order induced by likelihood ratios. Solving cutoff likelihood ratios yields consistent findings with recent developments in manufacturing, retail and healthcare sectors, where decreases in the data processing cost have shown to increase the fineness of the performance grids (Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007); Murff et al. (2011); Ewenstein, Hancock, and Komm (2016)). In the multi-agent model considered in Holmstrom (1982), the optimal monitor- ing technology partitions vectors of individual agents' likelihood ratios into convex polygons. Based on this result, we then compare individual and group performance evaluations from the angle of monitoring cost, showing that firms should switch from individual to group evaluation in response to rising monitoring costs. This result for- malizes the theses of Alchian and Demsetz (1972) and Lazear and Rosen (1981) that either team or tournament should be the dominant incentive system when individual performance evaluation is too costly to conduct. It is consistent with the findings of Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007) that lack of IT access increases the use of group performance evaluation among otherwise similar firms. In the multiple-task model studied in Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991), the re- sources spent on the assessment of a task performance should increase with the agent's endogenous tendency to shirk the corresponding task. Using simulation, we apply this result to the study of, e.g., how improved precision of some task measurements 3 (caused by, e.g., the advent of high-quality scanner data measuring the skillfulness in scanning items) would affect the resources spent on the assessments of other task performances (e.g., projecting warmth to customers). 1.1 Related Literature Earlier studies on contracting with costly experiments (in the sense of Blackwell (1953)) include, but are not limited to: Baiman and Demski (1980) and Dye (1986), in which the principal can pay an external auditor for drawing a signal from an exogenous distribution; Holmstrom (1979), Grossman and Hart (1983) and Kim (1995), in which signal distributions are ranked based on the incentive costs they incur. In these studies, the principal can change the probability space generated by the agent's hidden effort and, in the first two studies, through paying stylized costs. In contrast, we focus on the conversion of raw data into performance ratings while taking the probability space as given. Also our assumption that the monitoring cost increases with the amount of information carried by the output signal could be ill-suited for modeling the cost of running experiments. The current work differs from existing studies on rational inattention (hereafter RI) in three aspects. First, early developments in RI by Sims (1998, 2003), Ma´ckowiak and Wiederholt (2009) and Woodford (2009) sought to explain the stickiness of macroeconomic variables by information processing costs, whereas we examine the implication of costly yet flexible monitoring for principal-agent relationships.1 Sec- ond, we focus mainly on partitional monitoring technologies because in reality, adding non-performance-related factors into employee ratings could have dire consequences such as appeals, lawsuits and excessive turnover.2 Finally, our monitoring cost func- tion nests entropy as a special case. Recent works of Cr´emer, Garicano, and Prat (2007), Jager, Metzger, and Riedel (2011), Sobel (2015) and Dilm´e (2017) examine the optimal language used between organization members who share a common interest but face communication costs. 1Yang (2019) studies a security design problem where a rationally inattentive buyer can obtain any signal about the uncertain fundamental at a cost that is proportional to entropy reduction. Other recent efforts to introduce RI into strategic environments include but are not limited to: Mat´ejka and McKay (2012), Martin (2017) and Ravid (2017). 2See standard HR textbooks for this subject matter. Saint-Paul (2017) demonstrates the validity of entropy as an information cost in decision problems where the decision variable is a deterministic function of the exogenous state variable. 4 The absence of conflicting interests hence incentive constraints distinguishes these works from ours. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the baseline model; Section 3 presents main results; Sections 4 and 5 investigate extensions of the baseline model; Section 6 concludes. See Appendices A and B for omitted proofs and additional materials. 2 Baseline Model 2.1 Setup Primitives A risk-neutral principal faces a risk-averse agent, who earns a utility u (w) from spending a nonnegative wage w ≥ 0 and incurs a cost c (a) from privately exerting high or low effort a ∈ {0, 1}. The function u : R+ → R satisfies u (0) = 0, u(cid:48) > 0 and u(cid:48)(cid:48) < 0, whereas c (1) = c > c (0) = 0. Each effort choice a generates a probability space (Ω, Σ, Pa), where Ω is a finite- dimensional Euclidean space that comprises the agent's performance data, Σ is the Borel sigma-algebra on Ω, and Pa is the probability measure on (Ω, Σ). Pa's are assumed to be mutually absolutely continuous, and the probability density function pa's they induce are well-defined and everywhere positive. Incentive contract An incentive contract (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105) is a pair of monitoring tech- nology P and wage scheme w : P → R+. The former represents a human- or machine-operated system that governs the processing and analysis of performance data, whereas the latter maps outputs of the first-step procedure to different levels of wages. In the main body of this paper, P can be any partition of Ω with at most K cells that are all of positive measures,3 and w : P → R+ maps each cell A of P to a nonnegative wage w (A) ≥ 0.4 The upper bound K for the rating scale P can be any integer greater than one and will be taken as given throughout the analysis.5 3In Appendix B.2, we allow the monitoring technology to be any mapping from Ω to lotteries If the lottery is degenerate, then the monitoring technology is on finite performance categories. partitional. 4Appendix B.1 examines the case where the agent is constrained by individual rationality. 5The upper bound K, while stylized, guarantees the existence of optimal incentive contract(s). Judging from the simulation exercises we have so far conducted, the optimal rating scale is typically smaller than K even when µ is small (see, e.g., Figure 1). 5 For any data point ω ∈ Ω, let A (ω) be the unique performance category that contains ω and let w (A (ω)) be the wage associated with A (ω). Time evolves as follows: 1. the principal commits to (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105); 2. the agent privately chooses a ∈ {0, 1}; 3. Nature draws ω from Ω according to Pa; 4. the monitoring technology outputs A (ω); 5. the principal pays w (A (ω)) to the agent. Implementation cost For any given effort choice a by the agent, a monitoring technology P = {A1,··· , AN} outputs a signal X : Ω → P whose probability distri- bution is represented by a vector π (P, a) = (Pa (A1) ,··· , Pa (AN ) , 0,··· , 0) in the K-dimensional simplex. The principal incurs the following cost from implementing an incentive contract (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105):(cid:88) which consists of two parts. The first part (cid:80) A∈P Pa (A) w (A) + µ · H (P, a) , A∈P Pa (A) w (A), i.e., the incentive cost, has been the central focus of the existing principal-agent literature. The second part µ· H (P, a), hereafter termed the monitoring cost, represents the cost associated with the processing and analysis of the performance data. In particular, µ > 0 is an exogenous parameter which we will further discuss in Section 3.4, whereas H (P, a) captures the amount of information carried by the output signal and is assumed to satisfy the following properties: Assumption 1. There exists a function h : ∆K → R+ such that H (P, a) = h (π (P, a)) for all (P, a). Furthermore, (cid:1) for all probability vector (π1,··· , πK) ∈ ∆K (a) h (π1,··· , πK) = h(cid:0)πσ(1),··· , πσ(K) and permutation σ on {1,··· , K}; (b) h (0, π2,··· ) < h (π(cid:48) 1, π(cid:48)(cid:48) 2 ,··· ) for all (0, π2,··· ) and (π(cid:48) 1, π(cid:48) 2,··· ) ∈ ∆K that differ only in the first two elements and satisfy π2, π(cid:48) 1, π(cid:48) 2 > 0 and π2 = π(cid:48) 1 + π(cid:48) 2. 6 Inspired by basic principles of information theory, Assumption 1 stipulates that the amount of information carried by the output signal should depend only on the latter's probability distribution and must increase with the fineness of the monitoring technology. Aside from probabilities, nothing else matters, not even the naming or contents of the performance categories. Assumption 1 is satisfied by, e.g., the entropy A∈P Pa (A) log2 Pa (A) of the output signal and the bits of information log2 P it carries.6 In Section 2.2, we motivate the use of this assumption in the example of call center performance management. −(cid:80) The principal's problem Consider the problem of inducing high effort from the agent.7 Define a random variable Z : Ω → R by Z (ω) = 1 − p0 (ω) p1 (ω) ∀ω, where p0 (ω) /p1 (ω) is the likelihood ratio associated with data point ω. Note that E [Z a = 1] = 0 and that the range of Z is a subset of (−∞,−1). For any set A ∈ Σ of positive measure, define the z-value of A by z(A) = E [Z A; a = 1] . In words, z (A) represents the average value of Z conditional on the data point being drawn from A. A contract (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105) is incentive compatible if A∈P or, equivalently, (cid:88) P1 (A) u (w (A)) − c ≥(cid:88) (cid:88) A∈P P1 (A) u (w (A)) z (A) ≥ c, A∈P P0 (A) u (w (A)) and it satisfies the limited liability constraint if w (A) ≥ 0 ∀A ∈ P. 6The bit is a basic unit of information in information theory, computing, and digital communi- cations. In information theory, one bit is defined as the maximum information entropy of a binary random variable. 7The problem of inducing low effort is standard. 7 (IC) (LL) An optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent (optimal in- centive contract for short) minimizes the total implementation cost under high effort, subject to the incentive compatibility constraint and limited liability constraint: (cid:88) A∈P min (cid:104)P,w(·)(cid:105) P1 (A) w (A) + µ · H (P, 1) s.t. (IC) and (LL). In what follows, we will denote the solution(s) to the above problem by (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105). 2.2 Monitoring Cost We first illustrate Assumption 1 in the context of call center performance manage- ment: Example 1. In the example described in Section 1, a piece of performance data comprises the major characteristics of a call history (e.g., customer sentiment and voice quality) encoded in binary digits, and the monitoring technology represents the speech analytics program that categorizes binary digits into performance ratings. To formalize the design flexibility, we allow the monitoring technology to partition performance data into any N ≤ K categories, where K can be any interger greater than one. The cost of running the monitoring technology is assumed to increase with the amount of processed information, whose definition varies from case to case. For example, if the monitoring technology runs many times among many identical agents, then the optimal design should minimize the average steps it takes to find the performance category containing the raw data point. By now, it is well known that this quantity equals approximately the entropy of the output signal. In contrast, if the monitoring technology runs only a few times for a few number of agents, then the worst-case (or unamortized) amount of processed information is best captured by the bits of information carried by the output signal (see, e.g., Cover and Thomas (2006)). In both cases, the quantity of our interest depends only on the probability distribution of the output signal and nothing else. We next introduce the concept of setup cost and distinguish it from our notion of monitoring cost: Example 1 (Continued). As its name suggests, setup cost refers the cost incurred to set up the infrastructure that facilitates data processing and analysis, e.g., Fast 8 Fourier Transformation (FFT) chips (which transform sound waves into their major characteristics coded in binary digits), recording devices, etc.. The major role of setup cost is to change the probability space (Ω, Σ, Pa). For example, design improvements in FFT chips enable more frequent sampling of sound waves and cause (Ω, Σ, Pa) to change. In what follows, we will take the probability space as given and ignore the setup cost. That said, one can certainly embed our analysis into a two-stage setting in which the principal first incurs the setup cost and then the monitoring cost. Results below will carry over to this new setting. 3 Analysis 3.1 Preview √ w, Z is uniformly distributed over [−1/2, 1/2] under Example 2. Suppose u (w) = a = 1 and H (P, a) = f (P) for some strictly increasing function f : {1,··· , K} → R+. Below we walk through the key steps in solving the optimal incentive contract, give closed-form solutions and discuss their practical implications. Optimal wage scheme We first solve for the optimal wage scheme for any given monitoring technology P as in Holmstrom (1979). Specifically, label the performance categories as A1,··· , AN , and write πn = P1 (An) and zn = z (An) for n = 1,··· , N . Assume zj (cid:54)= zk for some j, k ∈ {1,··· , N} to make the analysis interesting. The principal's problem is then N(cid:88) N(cid:88) n=1 min{wn} πnwn, √ wnzn ≥ c, πn s.t. and wn ≥ 0, n = 1,··· , N. n=1 (IC) (LL) Straightforward algebra yields the expression for minimal incentive cost: (cid:33)−1 c2 πn max{0, zn}2 . (cid:32) N(cid:88) n=1 9 A close inspection reveals Holmstrom's (1979) sufficient statistics principle, namely z- value is the only part of the performance data that provides the agent with incentives. Optimal monitoring technology We next solve for the optimal monitoring tech- nology. First, note that the principal should partition performance data based only on their z-values, and that different performance categories must attain different z-values and wages. The reason combines the sufficient statistic principle with Assumption 1(b), namely merging performance categories of the same z-value saves the monitoring cost while leaving the incentive cost unaffected and thus constitutes an improvement to the original monitoring technology. A more interesting question concerns how we should assign the various data points, identified by their z-values, to different performance categories. In the baseline model featuring a single agent and binary efforts, the answer to this question is relatively straightforward: assign high (resp. low) z-values to high-wage (resp. low-wage) cat- egories. Here is a quick proof of this result: since the left-hand side of the (IC) constraint is supermodular in wages and z-values, if our conjecture were false, then reshuffling data points as above while holding the probabilities of performance cate- gories constant reduces the incentive cost while leaving the monitoring cost unaffected. When extending the above intuition to general settings featuring multiple agents or multiple actions, we face two challenges. First, in the case where z-values and wages are vectors, the direction of sorting these objects is nonobvious a priori. Second, changes in the sorting algorithm affect wages endogenously through the Lagrange multipliers of the incentive constraints, yielding effects that are new and difficult to assess using standard methods. The proof strategy presented in Section 3.3 overcomes these challenges, showing that the assignment of Lagrange multiplier-weighted z-values to performance cate- gories must be positive assortative in the direction of agent utilities. Geometrically, this means that any optimal monitoring technology must comprise convex cells in the space of z-values or their transformations. Theorems 1, 3 and 5 formalize the above statements. Implications An important feature of the optimal monitoring technology is in- formation aggregation -- a term used by human resource practitioners to refer to the aggregation of potentially high-dimensional performance data into rank-ordered rat- 10 ings such as "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory." The geometry of the optimal monitoring technology sheds light on the practical issues covered in Sections 3.4, 4.3 and 5.1. Consider, for example, optimal perfor- mance grids. In the current example, it can be shown that the optimal N -partitional monitoring technology divides the space [−1/2, 1/2] of z-values into N disjoint inter- vals [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn), n = 1,··· , N , where(cid:98)z0 = −1/2 and(cid:98)zN = 1/2. The optimal cut points {(cid:98)zn}N−1 n=1 can be solved as follows: (cid:33)−1 πn max{0, zn}2 − µ · f (N ) , (cid:32) N(cid:88) n=1 min{(cid:98)zn} c2 (cid:90) (cid:98)zn(cid:98)zn−1 (cid:90) (cid:98)zn(cid:98)zn−1 πn = zn = 1 πn dZ =(cid:98)zn −(cid:98)zn−1, ((cid:98)zn−1 +(cid:98)zn) . 1 2 ZdZ = where and Straightforward algebra yields (cid:98)zn = 2n − 1 4N − 2 , n = 1,··· , N − 1. Based on this result, as well as the functional form of f , we can then solve for the optimal rating scale N and hence the optimal incentive contract completely. 3.2 Main Results This section analyzes optimal incentive contracts. Results below hold true except perhaps on a measure zero set of data points. The same disclaimer applies to the remainder of this paper. We first define Z-convexity: Definition 1. A set A ∈ Σ is Z-convex if the following holds for all ω(cid:48), ω(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ A such that Z (ω(cid:48)) (cid:54)= Z (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)): {ω ∈ Ω : Z (ω) = (1 − s) · Z (ω(cid:48)) + s · Z (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)) for some s ∈ (0, 1)} ⊂ A. In words, a set A ∈ Σ is Z-convex if whenever it contains data points of different 11 z-values, it must also contain all data points of intermediate z-values. Let Z (A) denote the image of any set A ∈ Σ under mapping Z. In the case where Z (Ω) is a connected set in R, the above definition is equivalent to the convexity of Z (A) in R. A few assumptions before we go into detail. The next assumption says that the distribution of Z has no atom or hole: Assumption 2. Z is distributed atomlessly on a connected set Z (Ω) in R under a = 1. The next assumption says that Z (Ω) is compact set in R: Assumption 3. Z (Ω) is a compact set in R. The next assumption imposes regularities on the monitoring cost function: Part (a) of it holds for the bits of information carried by the output signal, and Part (b) of it holds for the entropy of the output signal: Assumption 4. The function h : ∆K → R+ satisfies one of the following conditions: (a) h (π (P, a)) = f (P) for some strictly increasing function f : {1,··· , K} → R+; (b) h is continuous. low) z-values to high-wage (resp. We now state our main results. The next theorem shows that any optimal incentive contract assigns data points of high (resp. low- wage) categories. Under Assumption 2, this can be achieved by first dividing z-values into disjoint intervals and then backing out the partition of the original data space accordingly. The result is an aggregation of potentially high-dimensional data into rank-ordered ratings, as well as a wage scheme that is strictly increasing in these ratings: Theorem 1. Assume Assumption 1 and let (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105) be any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent. Then P∗ comprises Z-convex cells labeled as A1,··· , AN where 0 = w∗ (A1) < ··· < w∗ (AN ). Assume, in addition, Assumption 2. Then there exist inf Z (Ω) =(cid:98)z0 <(cid:98)z1 < ··· <(cid:98)zN = sup Z(Ω) such that An = {ω : Z (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn)} for n = 1,··· , N .8 8Under Assumption 2, the set of (finite) cut points has measure zero, so it is unimportant which of the two adjacent intervals a cut point belongs to. The choice of expressing all intervals as right half-open ones is purely aesthetic. 12 The next theorem proves existence of optimal incentive contract: Theorem 2. An optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent exists under Assumptions 1-4. Proof. See Appendix A.1. 3.3 Proof Sketch The proof of Theorem 1 consists of three steps. The intuitions of steps one and two have already been discussed in Example 2. Step three is new. Step one We first take any monitoring technology P as given and solve for the optimal wage scheme as in Holmstrom (1979): (cid:88) A∈P min w:P→R+ P1 (A) w (A) s.t. (IC) and (LL). (3.1) The next lemma restates Holmstrom's (1979) sufficient statistic principle: Lemma 1. Let w∗ (·;P) be any solution to Problem (3.1). Then there exists λ > 0 such that u(cid:48) (w∗ (A;P)) = 1/ (λz (A)) for all A ∈ P such that w∗ (A;P) > 0. Proof. See Appendix A.1. Step two We next demonstrate that different performance categories must attain different z-values and wages: Lemma 2. Assume Assumption 1. Let (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105) be any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent and label the cells of P∗ as A1,··· , AN such that z (A1) ≤ ··· ≤ z (AN ). Then z (A1) < 0 < ··· < z (AN ) and 0 = w∗ (A1) < ··· < w∗ (AN ). Proof. See Appendix A.1. Step three We finally demonstrate that the assignment of z-values into wage cate- gories is positive assortative. In Example 2, we sketched a proof based on supermodu- larity and pointed out the difficulties of extending that argument to multidimensional environments. The argument below overcomes these difficulties. 13 and A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = and z (A(cid:48) ) = z(cid:48) (cid:54)= z (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ Ak such that P1 (A(cid:48) Take any optimal incentive contract with distinct performance categories Aj and Ak. From Lemma 2, we know that z (Aj) (cid:54)= z (Ak). Fix any > 0, and take any ⊂ Aj and A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = z(cid:48)(cid:48). A(cid:48) In words, A(cid:48) have the same probability under a = 1 but different z-values that are independent of . Lemma 3 of Appendix A.1.1 proves existence of A(cid:48) and A(cid:48)(cid:48) when is small. Consider a perturbation to the monitoring technology that "swaps" A(cid:48) and A(cid:48)(cid:48) . Post the perturbation, the new performance categories, denoted by An ()'s, become and An () = An for n (cid:54)= j, k. Since the Aj () = (Aj\A(cid:48) perturbation has no effect on the probabilities of the performance categories under a = 1, it does not affect the monitoring cost by Assumption 1(a). Meanwhile, it changes the principal's Lagrangian to the following (ignore the (LL) constraint): , Ak () = (Ak\A(cid:48)(cid:48) )∪ A(cid:48)(cid:48) )∪ A(cid:48) L () = πn (wn () − λ()u (wn ()) zn) + λ () c, (cid:88) n where πn denotes the probability of An (equivalently An ()) under a = 1, wn () the optimal wage at An (), and λ () the Lagrange multiplier associated with the (IC) constraint. A close inspection of the Lagrangian leads to the following conjec- ture: to minimize L (), the assignment of Lagrange multiplier-weighted z-values to performance categories must be positive assortative in the direction of agent utilities. To develop intuition, we assume differentiability and obtain L(cid:48) (0) = πnw(cid:48) n (0) − λ(cid:48) (0) πnu (wn (0)) zn (0) − c (cid:33) (cid:125) (cid:88) (cid:32)(cid:88) (cid:124) n (cid:88) n − λ(0) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:124) n (0) − 0 −(cid:88) (cid:88) n (1) = 0 (cid:123)(cid:122) (cid:123)(cid:122) (cid:125) n (0) − λ (0) (2) = 1/λ(0) (cid:88) n n = πnw(cid:48) πnw(cid:48) = − λ (0) = λ (0) (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) (u (wk (0)) − u (wj (0))) . πnu (wn (0)) z(cid:48) n (0) n n πn · u(cid:48) (wn (0)) zn (0) ·w(cid:48) n (0) + πnu (wn (0)) z(cid:48) n (0) n πnu (wn (0)) z(cid:48) n (0)  In the above expression, (1) = 0 because the (IC) constraint binds under the original 14 contract, and (2) = 1/λ (0) by Lemma 1. These findings resolve our concerns raised in Section 3.1, showing that the effects of our perturbation on the Lagrange multiplier and wages are negligible. To complete the proof, note that L(cid:48) (0) ≥ 0 by optimality, and that L(cid:48) (0) (cid:54)= 0 because λ (0) > 0, z(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:54)= z(cid:48) and wj (0) (cid:54)= wk (0) (Lemma 2). Combining yields L(cid:48) (0) > 0, so our conjecture is indeed true. Z-convexity is immediate: if a performance category contains extreme but not intermediate z-values, then the assignment of z- values goes in the wrong direction and an improvement can be constructed. The above proof strategy yields the endogenous direction of sorting raw data into performance categories, which is relatively straightforward in the baseline model but is less so in later extensions. The proof in Appendix A.1 does not assume differentiability and handles the limited liability constraint, too. 3.4 Implications Strict MLRP Theorem 1 implies that the signal generated by any optimal moni- toring technology must satisfy the strict monotone likelihood ratio property (hereafter strict MLRP ) with respect to the order induced by z-values: z(cid:22) A(cid:48) if z (A) ≤ z (A(cid:48)). Definition 2. For any A, A(cid:48) ∈ Σ of positive measures, write A Corollary 1. The signal X : Ω → P∗ generated by any optimal monitoring technology P∗ satisfies strict MLRP with respect to z(cid:22) A(cid:48) if and only if z (A) < z (A(cid:48)). z(cid:22), i.e., any A, A(cid:48) ∈ P∗ satisfy A While the signal generated by any monitoring technology trivially satisfies the z(cid:22) (i.e., replace "<" with "≤" in Corollary 1), it violates weak MLRP with respect to the strict MLRP if there are multiple performance categories that attain the same z- value. By contrast, the signal generated by any optimal monitoring technology must z(cid:22), because merging performance categories of satisfy the strict MLRP with respect to the same z-value saves the monitoring cost while leaving the incentive cost unaffected. Comparative statics The parameter µ captures factors that affect the (opportu- nity) cost of data processing and analysis. Factors that reduce µ include, but are not limited to: the advent of IT-based HR management systems in the 90's, advancements in speech analytics, increases in computing power, etc.. 15 To facilitate comparative statics analysis, we write any choice of optimal incentive contract as (cid:104)P∗(µ), w∗(·; µ)(cid:105) to make its dependence on µ explicit: Proposition 1. Fix any 0 < µ < µ(cid:48). For any choices of (cid:104)P∗(µ), w∗(·; µ)(cid:105) and (cid:104)P∗ (µ(cid:48)) , w∗ (·; µ(cid:48))(cid:105): (cid:88) P1 (A) w∗ (A; µ) ≤ (cid:88) (i) P1 (A) w∗ (A; µ(cid:48)); A∈P(µ) A∈P(µ(cid:48)) (ii) H (P∗ (µ) , 1) ≥ H (P∗ (µ(cid:48)) , 1); (iii) P∗(µ) ≥ P∗(µ(cid:48)) under Assumption 4(a). Proof. Part (i) follows from the optimalities of P∗(µ) and P∗(µ(cid:48)). Parts (ii) and (ii) are immediate. Proposition 1 shows that as data processing and analysis become cheaper, the principal pays less wage on average and the information carried by the output signal becomes finer. In the case where the monitoring cost is an increasing function of the rating scale (see, e.g., Hook, Jenkins, and Foot (2011)), the optimal rating scale is nonincreasing in µ. For other monitoring cost functions such as entropy, we can first compute the cutoff z-values and then the optimal rating scale as in Example 2.9 Figure 1 plots the numerical solutions obtained in a special case. The above findings are consistent with several strands of empirical facts. Among others, access to IT has proven to increase the fineness of the performance grids among manufacturing companies, holding other things constant (Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007, 2010); Bloom, Sadun, and Van Reenen (2012)).10 Crowdsourcing the processing and analysis of real-time data has enabled the "exact individual diagnosis" that separates distinctive and mediocre performers in companies like GE and Zalando (Ewenstein, Hancock, and Komm (2016)). 9In general, this is not an easy task because perturbations of cutoff z-values (which differ from the perturbation considered in Section 3.3) affect wages endogenously through the Lagrange multipliers of the incentive constraints. 10See the appendices of Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007) for survey questions regarding the fineness of the performance grids, e.g., "Each employee is given a red light (not performing), an amber light (doing well and meeting targets), a green light (consistently meeting targets, very high performer) and a blue light (high performer capable of promotion of up to two levels)," versus "rewards is based on an individual's commitment to the company measured by seniority." 16 Figure 1: Plot the optimal rating scale against µ: entropy cost, u (w) = U [−1/2, 1/2], c = 1, K = 100. √ w, Z ∼ 4 Extension: Multiple Agents 4.1 Setup Each of the two agents i = 1, 2 earns a payoff ui (wi) − ci (ai) from spending a nonnegative wage wi ≥ 0 and privately exerting high or low effort ai ∈ {0, 1}. The function ui : R+ → R satisfies ui (0) = 0, u(cid:48) i < 0, and ci (1) = ci > ci (0) = 0. i > 0 and u(cid:48)(cid:48) Each effort profile a = a1a2 generates a probability space (Ω, Σ, Pa), where Ω is a finite-dimensional Euclidean space that comprises agents' performance data, Σ is the Borel sigma-algebra on Ω, and Pa is the probability measure on (Ω, Σ). Pa's are assumed to be mutually absolutely continuous, and the probability density function pa's they induce are well-defined and everywhere positive. In this new setting, a monitoring technology P can be any partition of Ω with at most K cells that are all of positive measures, and a wage scheme w : P → R2 + maps each cell A of P to a vector w (A) = (w1 (A) , w2 (A)) (cid:62) of nonnegative wages. For any data point ω, let A (ω) be the unique performance category that contains ω and let w (A (ω)) be the wage vector associated with A (ω). Time evolves as follows: 1. the principal commits to (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105); 17 23450.00.51.01.52.0µP2. agent i privately chooses ai ∈ {0, 1}, i = 1, 2; 3. Nature draws ω from Ω according to Pa; 4. the monitoring technology outputs A (ω); 5. the principal pays wi (A (ω)) to agent i = 1, 2. Consider the problem of inducing both agents to exert high effort. Write 1 for (1, 1) and define a vector-valued random variable Z = (Z1, Z2) by (cid:62) (cid:62) Zi (ω) = 1 − pai=0,a−i=1 (ω) p1 (ω) ∀ω ∈ Ω, i = 1, 2. Define the z-value of any set A ∈ Σ of positive measure by (z1 (A) , z2 (A)) (cid:62) , where zi (A) = E [Zi A; a = 1] ∀i = 1, 2. A contract is incentive compatible for agent i if (cid:88) A∈P P1(A)ui (wi (A)) zi (A) ≥ ci, and it satisfies agent i's limited liability constraint if wi (A) ≥ 0 ∀A ∈ P. (ICi) (LLi) An optimal contract minimizes the total implementation cost under the high effort profile, subject to agents' incentive compatibility constraints and limited liability constraints: (cid:88) A∈P 2(cid:88) i=1 min (cid:104)P,w(·)(cid:105) Pa(A) wi(A) + µ · H(P, 1) s.t. (ICi) and (LLi), i = 1, 2. 4.2 Analysis The next definition generalizes Z-convexity: 18 Definition 3. A set A ∈ Σ is Z-convex if the following holds for all ω(cid:48), ω(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ A such that Z (ω(cid:48)) (cid:54)= Z (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)): {ω ∈ Ω : Z (ω) = (1 − s) · Z (ω(cid:48)) + s · Z (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)) for some s ∈ (0, 1)} ⊂ A. The next two assumptions impose regularities on the principal's problem analo- gously to Assumptions 2 and 3: Assumption 5. Z is distributed atomelessly on a connect set Z (Ω) in R2 under a = 1. Assumption 6. Z (Ω) is compact set in R2 with dim Z (Ω) = 2. The next theorems extend Theorems 1 and 2 to encompass multiple agents: Theorem 3. Assume Assumptions 1, 5 and 6. Then any optimal monitoring tech- nology comprises Z-convex cells that constitute convex polygons in R2. Theorem 4. An optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from both agents exists under Assumptions 1, 4, 5 and 6. Proof. See Appendix A.2. Proof sketch The proof strategy developed in Section 3.3 is useful for handling vector-valued z-values and wages. As before, fix any > 0, and take any subsets A(cid:48) and A(cid:48)(cid:48) of two distinct performance categories Aj and Ak, respectively, such that ) = z(cid:48)(cid:48) (Lemma 5 of Appendix A.2.1 P1 (A(cid:48) proves existence of sets that satisfy weaker properties). Post the perturbation as in Section 3.3, the principal's Lagrangian becomes (ignore (LLi) constraints): ) = and z (A(cid:48) ) = P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = z(cid:48) (cid:54)= z (A(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:33) L () = πn wi,n () − λi () ui (wi,n ()) zi,n () − ci , (cid:88) (cid:32)(cid:88) n i where πn denotes the probability of An (equivalently, An ()) under a = 1, wi,n () agent i's optimal wage at An () and λi () the Lagrange multiplier associated with the (ICi) constraint. Assuming differentiability, we obtain (cid:32) L(cid:48) (0) = −(cid:88) πn · u(cid:62) n n (cid:33) λ1 (0) 0 0 λ2 (0) 19 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)=0 d d zn () = (uk − uj) (cid:62) ((cid:98)z(cid:48)(cid:48) −(cid:98)z(cid:48)) , where and un = (u1 (wi,n (0)) , u2 (wi,n (0))) (cid:62) ∀n λ1 (0) 0 0 λ2 (0) z for z = z(cid:48), z(cid:48)(cid:48). (cid:32) (cid:98)z = (cid:33) Since L(cid:48)(0) ≥ 0 by optimality, the assignment of the Lagrange multiplier-weighted z- values into performance categories must be "positive assortative," where the direction of sorting is given by the vector of agents' utilities. This implies Z-convexity for the same reason as in Section 3.3. Implications Solving the optimal convex polygons is computationally hard. That said, note that the boundaries of convex polygons consist of straight line segments in Z (Ω), which combined with Assumption 5 yields the following observations: • any bi-partitional contract takes the form of either a team or a tournament and is fully captured by the intercept and slope of the straight line as depicted in Figure 2; Figure 2: Bi-partitional contracts: team and tournament. • contracts that evaluate and reward agents on an individual basis are fully de- termined by the individual performance cutoffs as depicted in Figure 3. 20 W1=0 W2=0 W1>0 W2>0 Z2 Z1 Z1 Z2 W1>0 W2=0 W1=0 W2>0 Figure 3: An individual incentive contract. 4.3 Application: Individual vs. Group Evaluation This section compares individual and group performance evaluations from the angle of monitoring cost. To obtain the sharpest insights, suppose that agents are techno- logically independent: Assumption 7. There exist probability spaces {(Ωi, Σi, Pi,ai)}i,ai that (Ω, Σ, Pa) = (Ω1 × Ω2, Σ1 ⊗ Σ2, P1,a1 × P2,a2) for all a ∈ {0, 1}2. as in Section 2 such In the language of contract theory, Assumption 7 rules out any technological link (i.e., ωi depends on a−i) or common productivity shock (i.e., ω1, ω2 are correlated given a) between agents. The next definition is standard: Definition 4. (i) P is an individual monitoring technology if for all A ∈ P, there exist A1 ∈ Σ1 and A2 ∈ Σ2 such that A = A1 × A2; otherwise P is a group monitoring technology; (ii) Let P be any individual monitoring technology. Then w : P → R2 (cid:0)Ai × A(cid:48) −i;P(cid:1) = wi (cid:0)Ai × A(cid:48)(cid:48) −i;P(cid:1) for all i = 1, 2 and + is an indi- vidual wage scheme if wi Ai × A(cid:48) −i, Ai × A(cid:48)(cid:48) (iii) (cid:104)P, w : P → R2 −i ∈ P; otherwise w : P → R2 +(cid:105) is an individual incentive contract if P is an individual + is an individual wage scheme; otherwise + is a group wage scheme; monitoring technology and w : P → R2 it is a group incentive contract. 21 W1>0 W2>0 W1>0 W2=0 W1=0 W2=0 W1=0 W2>0 Z1 Z2 By definition, a group incentive contract either conducts group performance eval- uations or pairs individual performance evaluations with group incentive pays. Under Assumption 7, the second option is sub-optimal by the sufficient statistics principle or Holmstrom (1982), thus reducing the comparison between individual and group incentive contracts to that of individual and group performance evaluations. Let I be the ratio between the minimal cost of implementing bi-partitional incen- tive contracts and that of implementing individual incentive contracts (the latter, by definition, have at least four performance categories). I < 1 is a definitive indicator that group evaluation is optimal whereas individual evaluation is not. The next result is immediate: Corollary 2. Under Assumptions 1, 4(a), 5, 6 and 7, I < 1 when µ is large. Beyond the case considered in Corollary 2, we can compute I numerically based on the prior discussion about how to parameterize bi-partitional and individual incentive contracts. Figure 4 plots the solutions obtained in a special case. Figure 4: Plot I against µ: entropy cost, ui (w) = for i = 1, 2. √ w, Zi ∼ U [−1/2, 1/2] and ci = 1 Our result formalizes the theses of Alchian and Demsetz (1972) and Lazear and Rosen (1981) that either team or tournament should be the dominant incentive sys- It enriches tem when individual performance evaluation is too costly to conduct. 22 1.01.11.20510152025mIthe analyses of Holmstrom (1982), Green and Stokey (1983) and Mookherjee (1984), which attribute the use of group incentive contracts to the technological dependence between agents while abstracting away from the issue of data processing and analysis. Recently, these views are reconciled by Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007), which find -- just as our theory predicts -- that companies make different choices between in- dividual and group evaluations despite being technologically similar, and that group evaluation is most prevalent when the capacity to sift out individual-level information is limited by, e.g., the lack of IT access.11 In the future, it will be interesting to nail down the role of IT in Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007), and to replicate these studies for recent advancements in data technologies. 5 Extension: Multiple Actions In this section, suppose that the agent's action space A is a finite set, and that taking an action a in A incurs a cost c (a) to the agent and generates a probability space (Ω, Σ, Pa) as in Section 2. The principal wishes to induce the most costly action a∗, i.e., c (a∗) > c (a) for all a ∈ D = A − {a∗}. For any deviation from a∗ to a ∈ D, define a random variable Za : Ω → R by Za (ω) = 1 − pa (ω) pa∗ (ω) ∀ω ∈ Ω. For any a ∈ D and set A ∈ Σ of positive measure, define za (A) = E [Za A; a∗] . A contract is incentive compatible if for all a ∈ D: (cid:88) A∈P Pa∗ (A) u (w (A)) za (A) ≥ c (a∗) − c (a) . (ICa) 11See the survey questions of Bloom and Van Reenen (2006, 2007) regarding the choices between individual and group evaluations, e.g., "employees are rewarded based on their individual contribu- tions to the company," and "compensation is based on shift/plant-level outcomes." The former is regarded as an advanced but expensive managerial practice and is more prevalent among companies with better IT access, other things being equal. 23 An optimal incentive contract (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105) that induces a∗ solves Pa∗ (A) w (A) + µ · H (P, a∗) s.t. (ICa) ∀a ∈ D and (LL). (cid:88) A∈P min (cid:104)P,w(·)(cid:105) Write Z for (Za) a∈D. For any D-vector λ = (λa) a∈D in RD (cid:62) (cid:62) variable Zλ : Ω → R by + , define a random Zλ (ω) = λ(cid:62)Z (ω) ∀ω ∈ Ω. The next definition generalizes Z-convexity: Definition 5. A set A ∈ Σ is Zλ-convex if the following holds for all ω(cid:48), ω(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ A such that Zλ (ω(cid:48)) (cid:54)= Zλ (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)): {ω : Zλ (ω) = (1 − s) · Zλ (ω(cid:48)) + s · Zλ (ω(cid:48)(cid:48)) for some s ∈ (0, 1)} ⊂ A. The next theorems extend Theorems 1 and 2 to encompass multiple actions: Theorem 5. Assume Assumption 1 and Assumption 3 for all a ∈ D. Then for any optimal incentive contract (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105) that induces a∗, there exists λ∗ ∈ RD with (cid:107)λ∗(cid:107) > 012 such that all cells of P∗ are Zλ∗-convex and can be labeled as A1,··· , AN such that 0 = w∗ (A1) < ··· < w∗ (AN ). Assume, in addition, As- sumption 2 for all a ∈ D. Then there exist −∞ ≤ (cid:98)z0 < ··· < (cid:98)zN < +∞ such that An = {ω : Zλ∗ (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn)} for n = 1,··· , N . + Theorem 6. Assume Assumptions 1 and 4, as well as Assumptions 2 and 3 for all a ∈ D. Then an optimal incentive contract that induces a∗ exists. Proof. See Appendix A.3. In the presence of multiple actions, each data point is associated with finitely many z-values, each corresponding to a deviation from a∗ that the agent can potentially commit. By establishing that the assignment of Lagrange multiplier-weighted z- values into wage categories is positive assortative, Theorem 5 relates the focus of data processing and analysis to the agent's endogenous tendencies to commit deviations. Intuitively, when λ∗ a is large and hence the agent is tempted to commit deviation a, focus should be given to the information Za that helps detect deviation a, and the 12(cid:107) · (cid:107) denotes the sup norm in the remainder of this paper. 24 final performance rating should vary significantly with the assessment of Za. The next section gives an application of this result. 5.1 Application: Multiple Tasks A single agent can exert either high or low effort ai ∈ {0, 1} in each of the two tasks i = 1, 2, and each ai independently generates a probability space (Ωi, Σi, Pi,ai) as in Section 2. The goal of a risk-neutral principal is to induce high effort in both tasks. Write a = a1a2, ω = ω1ω2, A = {11, 01, 10, 00}, a∗ = 11 and D = {01, 10, 00}. For any i = 1, 2 and ωi ∈ Ωi, define Zi (ωi) = 1 − pi,ai=0 (ωi) pi,ai=1 (ωi) , where pi,ai is the probability density function induced by Pi,ai. For any ω ∈ Ω1 × Ω2 and λ = (λ01, λ10, λ00) (cid:62) ∈ R3 +, define Zλ (ω) = (λ01 + λ00) · Z1(ω1) + (λ10 + λ00) · Z2 (ω2) − λ00 · Z1 (ω1) Z2 (ω2) . The next corollary is immediate from Theorem 5: Corollary 3. Assume Assumption 1 and Assumption 3 for all a ∈ D. Then for any optimal incentive contract (cid:104)P∗, w∗ (·)(cid:105) that induces high effort in both tasks, there 00 > 0 such that all cells of P∗ are Zλ∗-convex exists λ∗ ∈ R3 addition, Assumption 2 for all a ∈ D. Then there exist −∞ ≤(cid:98)z0 < ··· <(cid:98)zN < +∞ and can be labeled as A1,··· , AN such that 0 = w∗ (A1) < ··· < w∗ (AN ). Assume, in such that An = {ω : Zλ∗ (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn)} for n = 1,··· , N . + with λ∗ 10 + λ∗ 01 + λ∗ 00, λ∗ In a seminal paper, Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991) shows that when the agent faces multiple tasks, over-incentivizing tasks that generate precise performance data may prevent the completion of tasks that generate noisy performance data. That analysis abstracts away from monitoring costs and focuses on the power of (linear) compensation schemes. Corollary 3 delivers a different message: when it comes to allocating limited re- sources across the assessments of multiple task performances, the optimal allocation should reflect the agent's endogenous tendency to shirk each task. The usefulness of this result is illustrated by the next example: 25 Example 3. A cashier faces two tasks: to scan items and to project warmth to customers. A piece of performance data consists of the scanner data recorded by the point of sale (POS) system, as well as the feedback gathered from customers. By Corollary 3, the following ratio: R = λ∗ 01 + λ∗ 10 + λ∗ λ∗ 00 00 captures how the principal should allocate limited resources across the assessments of skillfulness in scanning items and warmth. Intuitively, a small R arises when the cashier is reluctant to project warmth to customers, in which case resources should be devoted to the assessment of warmth, and the final performance rating should depend significantly on such assessment. We examine how optimal resource allocation varies with the precision of raw performance data. As in Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991), we assume that • ωi = ai + ξi for i = 1, 2, where ξi's are independent normal random variables with mean zero and variance σ2 i 's; • the cashier has CARA utility of consumption u(w) = 1 − exp (−γw). Unlike Holmstrom and Milgrom (1991), we do not confine ourselves to linear wage schemes. 1, holding σ2 In the case where the monitoring cost is an increasing function of the rating 2 = 1 and P = 2 fixed. Our scale, we compute R for different values of σ2 findings are reported in Figure 5. Assuming that our parameter choices are reasonable ones, we arrive at the following conclusion: as skillfulness becomes easier to measure -- thanks to the advent of high quality scanner data -- the cashier becomes more afraid to shirk the scanning task and less so about projecting coldness to customers; to correct the cashier's incentive, resources should be shifted towards the processing and analysis of customer feedback and away from that of scanner data. In the future, one can test this prediction by running field experiments as that of Bloom et al. (2013). For example, one can randomize the quality of scanner data among otherwise similar stores and examine the effect on resource allocation between scanner data and customer feedback. 26 1: H (P, a) = f (P), P = 2; u (w) = 1 − exp (−.5w); Figure 5: Plot R against σ2 c (00) = 0, c (01) = 0.3, c (10) = 0.2 and c (11) = 0.5; ξ1 and ξ2 are normally distributed with mean zero and σ2 2 = 1. 6 Conclusion We conclude by posing open questions. First, our work is broadly related to the burgeoning literature on information design (see, e.g., Bergemann and Morris (2019) for a survey), and we hope it inspires new research questions such as how to conduct costly yet flexible monitoring in long-term employment relationships. Second, our theory may guide investigations into empirical issues such as how advancements in big data technologies have affected the design and implementation of monitoring technologies, and whether they can partially explain the heterogeneity in the internal organizations of otherwise similar firms. We hope that someone, maybe ourselves, will pursue these research agendas in the future. A Omitted Proofs A.1 Proofs of Section 3 In this appendix, write any N -partitional contract (cid:104)P, w(·)(cid:105) as the corresponding tuple (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1, where An is a generic cell of P, πn = P1 (An), zn = z (An) and wn = w (An). Assume w.l.o.g. that z1 ≤ ··· ≤ zN . 27 0.50.60.70.80.91.00.250.500.751.00s2RA.1.1 Useful Lemmas Proof of Lemma 1 Proof. The wage-minimization problem for given monitoring technology (cid:104)An, πn, zn(cid:105)N as in Lemma 1 is n=1 N(cid:88) min(cid:104) wn(cid:105) (cid:32) N(cid:88) (cid:33) − N(cid:88) πn wn − λ πnu ( wn) zn − c ηn wn, n=1 n=1 n=1 where λ and ηn denote the Lagrange multipliers associated with the (IC) constraint and (LL) constraint at wn, respectively. Differentiating the objective function with respect to wn and setting the result equal to zero yields λznu(cid:48) (wn) = 1 − ηn/πn, implying that u(cid:48) (wn) = 1/ (λzn) if and only if wn > 0. Proof of Lemma 2 Proof. Fix any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent and let (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1 be the corresponding tuple. Note that N ≥ 2. By Assumption 1(b), if wj = wk for some j (cid:54)= k, then merging Aj and Ak has no effect on the incentive cost but strictly reduces the monitoring cost, which contradicts the optimality of the original contract. Then from Lemma 1 and the assumption z1 ≤ ··· ≤ zN , it follows that 0 ≤ w1 < ··· < wN and z1 < ··· < zN . In particular, we must have z1 < 0 n=1 πnzn = 0. This implies w1 = 0, because otherwise letting w1 = 0 reduces the expected wage and relaxes the (IC) constraint while keeping the (LL) constraint satisfied. Finally, combining wn > 0 for n ≥ 2 and Lemma 1 yields zn > 0 for n ≥ 2. because (cid:80)N Lemma 3. For all A ∈ Σ such that P1 (A) > 0 and ∈ (0, P1 (A)], there exists A ⊂ A such that P1 (A) = and z (A) = z (A). Proof. Let A be as above. Since P1 admits a density, it follows that for all t ∈ (0, P1(A)], there exists Bt ⊂ A such that P1 (Bt) = t and Z (ω(cid:48)) ≤ Z (ω) for all ω ∈ Bt and ω(cid:48) ∈ A \ Bt. Likewise, there exists Ct ⊂ A such that P1 (Ct) = t and Z (ω(cid:48)) ≥ Z (ω) for all ω ∈ Ct and ω(cid:48) ∈ A \ Ct. For t = 0 define B0 = C0 = ∅. 28 Let be as above. Consider Bt ∪ C−t, t ∈ [0, ]. Since z (Bt) ≥ z (A) and z (C−t) ≤ z (A) for all t ∈ (0, ) and z (Bt ∪ C−t) is continuous in t (because P1 admits a density), there exists t ∈ [0, ] such that z (Bt ∪ C−t) = z (A). Meanwhile P1 (Bt ∪ C−t) = by construction, so let A = Bt ∪ C−t and we are done. A.1.2 Proof of Theorem 1 Proof. Take any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent and let (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1 be the corresponding tuple. Suppose, to the contrary, that some Aj is not Z-convex. By Definition 1, there exist A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ Aj and A ⊂ Ak, k (cid:54)= j such that (i) P1 (A(cid:48)), P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48)), P1( A) > 0, and (ii) z = (1 − s) z(cid:48) + sz(cid:48)(cid:48), where z(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)) (cid:54)= z(cid:48)(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)(cid:48)), z := z( A) and s ∈ (0, 1). By Lemma 3, for all ⊂ A(cid:48)(cid:48) and A ⊂ A ∈ (0, min{P1 (A(cid:48)) , P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48)) , P1( A)}), there exist A(cid:48) such that (i) P1 (A(cid:48) ) = z(cid:48)(cid:48) and z( A) = z. ) = P1( A) = , and (ii) z (A(cid:48) ) = z(cid:48), z (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48) Consider two perturbations to the monitoring technology: (a) move A(cid:48) to Ak and A to Aj; (b) move A to Aj and A(cid:48)(cid:48) to Ak. By construction, neither perturbation affects the probability distribution of the output signal under high effort and hence the monitoring cost. Below we demonstrate that one of them strictly reduces the incentive cost compared to the original (optimal) contract. Perturbation (a) Let (cid:104)An(), πn, zn()(cid:105)N n=1 be the tuple associated with the mon- itoring technology after perturbation (a). By construction, Aj () = (Aj ∪ A) \ A(cid:48) , so πjzj − z(cid:48) + z πj s (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) . = zj + πj zj () = Likewise, Ak () = (Ak ∪ A(cid:48) manipulation as above yields ) \ A and An () = An for n (cid:54)= j, k, and similar algebraic zj () = zj + s (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) zk () = zk − s (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) πk zn () = zn ∀n (cid:54)= j, k. πj , , (A.1) 29 Consider wage profile (cid:104)wn ()(cid:105)N binding after the perturbation, i.e., n=1 such that w1 () = 0 and the (IC) constraint remains N(cid:88) n=1 πnu (wn ()) zn () = N(cid:88) n=1 πnu (wn) zn = c. (A.2) A close inspection of Equations (A.1) and (A.2) reveals the existence of M > 0 independent of such that when is small, there exist wage profiles as above that satisfy wn () − wn < M for all n and hence the (LL) constraint by Lemma 2.13 With a slight abuse of notation, write wn () = (wn () − wn) / and zn () = (zn () − zn) /,14 and note that w1 () = 0. When is small, expanding Equation (A.2) using the twice-differentiability of u (·) and wn () − wn ∼ O () yields N(cid:88) (cid:0)u (wn) + u(cid:48) (wn) · wn () · + O(cid:0)2(cid:1)(cid:1) (zn + zn () · ) . N(cid:88) πnu (wn) zn = πn n=1 n=1 Multiply the above equation by the Lagrange multiplier λ > 0 associated with the (IC) constraint prior to the perturbation. Rearranging yields πn · u(cid:48) (wn) · λzn · wn () = −λ u (wn) · πn zn () + O () , n=1 n=1 and simplifying using w1 () = 0, u(cid:48) (wn) = 1/ (λzn) for n ≥ 2 (Lemmas 1 and 2) and Equation (A.1) yields N(cid:88) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) n=1 N(cid:88) πn wn () = s (u (wk) − u (wj)) (λz(cid:48)(cid:48) − λz(cid:48)) + O () . (A.3) Perturbation (b) Repeating the above argument for perturbation (b) yields πn wn () = −λ (1 − s) (u (wk) − u (wj)) (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) + O () . (A.4) 13To be precise, recall that u (wn), zn > 0 for n ≥ 2 by Lemma 2. Thus when is small, zn () > 0 n=1 for n ≥ 2 and solving(cid:80)N n=2 πnu (xn) zn () =(cid:80)N n=2 πnu (wn) zn yields wage profiles as above. 14Note that we do not assume differentiability of wn () or zn () with respect to . The same disclaimer applies to the remainder of this paper. 30 Then from u (wj) (cid:54)= u (wk) (Lemma 2), z(cid:48) (cid:54)= z(cid:48)(cid:48) (by assumption) and λ > 0, it follows that the right-hand side of either Equation (A.3) or (A.4) is strictly negative when is small. Thus for either perturbation (a) or (b), we can construct a wage profile that incurs a lower incentive cost than the original optimal contract, and this leads to a contradiction. A.1.3 Proof of Theorem 2 Proof. By Theorem 1, any optimal monitoring technology with at most N ∈ {2,··· , K} cells is fully characterized by N−1 cutpoints(cid:98)z1,··· ,(cid:98)zN−1 satisfying min Z (Ω) ≤(cid:98)z1 ≤ ··· ≤(cid:98)zN−1 ≤ max Z (Ω). Write(cid:98)z = ((cid:98)z1,··· ,(cid:98)zN−1) . Define (cid:62) ZN = {(cid:98)z : min Z (Ω) ≤(cid:98)z1 ≤ ··· ≤(cid:98)zN−1 ≤ max Z (Ω)} , equip ZN with the sup norm (cid:107) · (cid:107), and note that ZN is compact by Assumption 3. Let W ((cid:98)z) be the minimal incentive cost for inducing high effort from the agent under the monitoring technology formed by(cid:98)z. Note that W ((cid:98)z) exists and is finite if and only if min Z (Ω) < (cid:98)zn < max Z (Ω) for some n, because then z (A) (cid:54)≡ 0 across the performance category A's formed under(cid:98)z, so W ((cid:98)z) can be solved by applying Lemma 1. We proceed in two steps. Step 1 Show that W ((cid:98)z) is continuous in(cid:98)z for any given N ∈ {2,··· , K}. Fix any(cid:98)z ∈ ZN such that W ((cid:98)z) is finite. W.l.o.g. consider the case where (cid:98)zn's are all distinct. For sufficiently small δ > 0, let(cid:98)zδ be any element of ZN such that (cid:107)(cid:98)zδ −(cid:98)z(cid:107) < δ. Let πn and zn (resp. πδ n = (cid:8)ω : Z(ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zδ n)(cid:9)), n−1,(cid:98)zδ and z-value of An = {ω : Z (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn)} (resp. Aδ n) denote the probability (under a = 1) n and zδ respectively. Let wn denote the optimal wage at An. Fix any > 0, and consider the wage profile that pays wn + at Aδ n > 0 and wn otherwise. By construction, this wage profile satisfies the (LL) constraint. Under Assumptions 2 and 3, it satisfies the (IC) constraint when δ is sufficiently small: n if zδ lim δ→0 n n 31 (cid:88) nu(cid:0)wn + 1zδ n>0 · (cid:1) zδ πδ (cid:88) n = πnu (wn + 1zn>0 · ) zn > c, n πnzn = 0 and zn (cid:54)≡ 0 so zn > 0 for some n. In (cid:88) addition, since where the inequality holds because(cid:80) (cid:0)wn + 1zδ W(cid:0)(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) − W ((cid:98)z) ≤(cid:88) lim δ→0 πδ n n (cid:88) n>0 · (cid:1) = (cid:0)wn + 1zδ πδ n n it follows that when δ is sufficiently small, πn (wn + 1zn>0 · ) , n>0 · (cid:1) −(cid:88) πnwn < , n n where the first inequality holds because the constructed wage profile is not necessarily optimal under (cid:98)zδ. Finally, interchanging the roles between (cid:98)z and (cid:98)zδ in the above derivation yields W ((cid:98)z) − W(cid:0)(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) < , implying that(cid:12)(cid:12)W(cid:0)(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) − W ((cid:98)z)(cid:12)(cid:12) < when δ is sufficiently small. Step 2 Under Assumption 4(a), the following quantity: W ((cid:98)z) WN := min(cid:98)z∈ZN exists and is finite for all N ∈ {2,··· , K} by Step 1 and the compactness of ZN . Let mN denote the minimal rating scale attained by WN . Solving WN + µ · f (mN ) min 2≤N≤K yields the solution(s) to the principal's problem. Under Assumption 4(b), the principal's problem can be written as follows: W ((cid:98)z) + µ · h (π ((cid:98)z)) , min(cid:98)z∈ZK where π ((cid:98)z) is the probability vector formed under(cid:98)z and is clearly continuous in(cid:98)z. The existence of solution(s) then follows from Step 1 and the compactness of ZK. A.2 Proof of Section 4 In this appendix, write any N -partitional contract (cid:104)P, w(·)(cid:105) as the corresponding n=1, where An is a generic cell of P, πn = P1 (An), zn = tuple (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N 32 (cid:62) (z1,n, z2,n) (cid:62) := (z1 (An) , z2 (An)) (cid:62) and wn = (w1,n, w2,n) (cid:62) := (w1 (An) , w2 (An)) . A.2.1 Useful Lemmas The next lemma generalizes Lemmas 1 and 2 to encompass multiple agents: Lemma 4. Assume Assumption 1. Then under any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from both agents, (i) there exist λ1, λ2 > 0 such that u(cid:48) i (wi,n) = 1/ (λizi,n) if and only if wi,n > 0; (ii) wj (cid:54)= wk for all j (cid:54)= k. Proof. The wage-minimization problem for given monitoring technology (cid:104)An, πn, zn(cid:105)N is n=1 (cid:88) πn wi,n −(cid:88) λi (cid:32)(cid:88) min(cid:104) wi,n(cid:105) (cid:33) −(cid:88) i,n i n i,n πnui ( wi,n) zi,n − ci ηi,n wi,n, where λi and ηi,n denote the Lagrange multipliers associated with the (ICi) constraint and (LLi) constraint at wi,n, respectively. Differentiating the objective function with respect to wi,n yields the first-order condition in Part (i). The proof of Part (ii) is the same as that of Lemma 2 and is therefore omitted. The next lemma plays an analogous role as that of Lemma 3: Lemma 5. Assume Assumption 6. Fix any δ > 0 and any A ∈ Σ such that P1 (A) > 0. Then for all ∈ (0, P1 (A)], there exists A ⊂ A such that P1 (A) = and (cid:107)z (A) − z (A)(cid:107) < δ. let P be any finite partition of Ω such Proof. With a slight abuse of notation, that every B ∈ P is measurable and (cid:107)Z (ω) − Z (ω(cid:48))(cid:107) < δ for all ω, ω(cid:48) ∈ B. P exists because P1 admits a density and Z (Ω) is a compact set in R2. Define P + = {B ∈ P : P1 (A ∩ B) > 0} and P 0 = {B ∈ P : P1 (A ∩ B) = 0}, which are B∈P + P1 (A ∩ B) = P1 (A) and both finite. Note that (cid:80) B∈P 0 P1 (A ∩ B) = 0, (cid:80) z (A) =(cid:80) construction. Let A = ∪B∈P +CB. Then P1 (A) =(cid:80) Since P1 admits a density, it follows that for all B ∈ P +, there exists CB ⊂ A∩ B such that P1 (CB) = P1 (A ∩ B) /P1 (A). Also note that (cid:107)z (CB)−z (A ∩ B)(cid:107) < δ by B∈P + P1 (A ∩ B) /P1 (A) = B∈P + P1 (A ∩ B) z (A ∩ B). 33 and (cid:107)z (A) − z (A)(cid:107) = (cid:107) (cid:88) B∈P + P1 (A ∩ B) P1 (A) ≤ (cid:88) B∈P + A.2.2 Proof of Theorem 3 (z (CB) − z (A ∩ B))(cid:107) P1 (A ∩ B) P1 (A) (cid:107)z (CB) − z (A ∩ B)(cid:107) < δ. Proof. Take any optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from both agents and let (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1 be the corresponding tuple. Suppose, to the contrary, that some Aj is not Z-convex. By definition, there exist A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ Aj and A ∈ Ak, k (cid:54)= j such that (i) P1 (A(cid:48)), P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48)), P1( A) > 0, and (ii) z = (1 − s)z(cid:48) + sz(cid:48)(cid:48) where z(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)) (cid:54)= z(cid:48)(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)(cid:48)), z := z( A) and s ∈ (0, 1). By Lemma 5, for all δ > 0 ⊂ A(cid:48)(cid:48) and A ⊂ A and ∈ (0, min{P1(A(cid:48)), P1(A(cid:48)(cid:48)), P1( A)}), there exist A(cid:48) ) − z(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:107), such that (i) P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:107)z( A) − z(cid:107) < δ. ) = P1( A) = , and (ii) (cid:107)z (A(cid:48) ) − z(cid:48)(cid:107), (cid:107)z (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = P1 (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) Consider two perturbations to the monitoring technology: (a) move A(cid:48) to Ak and A to Aj; (b) move A to Aj and A(cid:48)(cid:48) to Ak. By Assumption 1, neither perturbation affects the probability distribution of the output signal under a = 1 and hence the monitoring cost. Below we demonstrate that one of them strictly reduces the incentive cost compared to the original optimal contract. Perturbation (a) Let (cid:104)An () , πn, zn ()(cid:105)N monitoring technology after perturbation (a), where Aj () = (Aj ∪ A)\ A(cid:48) (Ak ∪ A(cid:48) ) \ A and An () = An for n (cid:54)= j, k. Straightforward algebra shows that n=1 denote the tuple associated with the , Ak () =  zj() = zj + z( A) − z (A(cid:48) ) zk() = zk − z( A) − z (A(cid:48) πk zn() = zn ∀n (cid:54)= j, k, πj ) , , (A.5) 34 and that (cid:107)z( A) − z (A(cid:48) ) − (z − z(cid:48))(cid:107) ≤(cid:107)z( A) − z(cid:107) + (cid:107)z (A(cid:48) (cid:26) (cid:27) ) − z(cid:48)(cid:107) (cid:107)Z (ω)(cid:107) < min 2δ, 4 max ω∈Ω . (A.6) Define Bi = {n : wi,n = 0} for i = 1, 2. Consider wage profile (cid:104)wn ()(cid:105)N n=1 such that for i = 1, 2: (1) wi,n () = wi,n = 0 for n ∈ Bi; (2) agent i's incentive compatibility constraint remains binding after perturbation (a), i.e., N(cid:88) πnui (wi,n ()) zi,n () = πnui (wi,n) zi,n = ci. (A.7) n=1 n=1 A close inspection of Equations (A.5)-(A.7) reveals the existence of M > 0 indepen- dent of and δ such that when is sufficiently small, there exist wage profiles as above that satisfy (cid:107)wn () − wn(cid:107) < M for all n and hence (LLi) constraints. With a slight abuse of notation, write wn () = (wn () − wn) / and zn () = (zn () − zn) /, and note that wi,n () = 0 for i = 1, 2 and n ∈ Bi. When is small, expanding Equation (A.7) using the twice-differentiability of ui (·) and wi,n () − wi,n ∼ O () and multiplying the result by the Lagrange multiplier λi > 0 associated with the (ICi) constraint prior to the perturbation yields πn · u(cid:48) i (wi,n) · λizi,n · wi,n () = −λi ui (wi,n) · πn zi,n () + O () . n=1 n=1 Simplifying using wi,n () = 0 if n ∈ Bi, u(cid:48) (wi,n) = 1/ (λizi,n) if n /∈ Bi (Lemma 4) N(cid:88) and Equation (A.5) yields(cid:88) πn wi,n = (uk − uj) (cid:62) Λ (z( A) − z (A(cid:48) )) + O () , i,n (cid:62) where un = (u1 (w1,n) , u2 (w2,n)) for n = k, j and Λ =(cid:0) λ1 0 (cid:1). Further simplifying 0 λ2 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) 35 using Equation (A.6) and z = (1 − s)z(cid:48) + sz(cid:48)(cid:48) yields the following when δ is small: πn wi,n = (uk − uj) (cid:62) Λ (z − z(cid:48)) + O () i,n + (uk − uj) =s (uk − uj) (cid:62) ) − (z − z(cid:48))) Λ (z( A) − z (A(cid:48) (cid:62) Λ (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) + O () + O (δ) . (A.8) (cid:88) (cid:88) Perturbation (b) Repeating the above argument for perturbation (b) yields πn wi,n = −(1 − s) (uk − uj) (cid:62) Λ (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) + O () + O (δ) . (A.9) i,n Consider two cases: Case 1 (uk − uj) (cid:62) Case 2 (uk − uj) (cid:62) Λ (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) (cid:54)= 0. In this case, the right-hand sides of Equations (A.8) and (A.9) have the opposite signs when and δ are sufficiently small, and the remainder of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 1. Λ (z(cid:48)(cid:48) − z(cid:48)) = 0. In this case, note that (uk − uj) Λ (cid:54)= 0(cid:62) by Lemma 4, where 0 denotes the 2-vector of zeros. Then from Assumption 5 (Z is dis- tributed atomlessly on a connected set), there exist B(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48), B(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48)(cid:48) and B ⊂ A such that P1 (B(cid:48)), P1 (B(cid:48)(cid:48)), P1( B) > 0, z( B) = (1 − s(cid:48)) z (B(cid:48)) + s(cid:48)z (B(cid:48)(cid:48)) for some s(cid:48) ∈ (0, 1), and (uk − uj) Λ (z (B(cid:48)(cid:48)) − z (B(cid:48))) (cid:54)= 0. Replacing A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:62) and A with B(cid:48), B(cid:48)(cid:48) and B, respectively, in the above argument gives the desired result. (cid:62) A.2.3 Proof of Theorem 4 Proof. By Theorem 3, any optimal monitoring technology with at most N ∈ {2,··· , K} cells is fully characterized by (1) a finite number qN of vertices z1,··· , zqN in Z (Ω), and (2) a qN × qN adjacency matrix M whose lm'th entry equals 1 if zl and zm are connected by a line segment and 0 otherwise. By definition, M is symmetric and hence is determined by its upper triangle entries, which can be either 0 or 1. Thus M belongs to MN := {0, 1}qN×(qN−1)/2, which is a finite set. 36 Write (cid:126)z for (z1,··· , zqN ) MN , define (cid:62) . For any N ∈ {2,··· , K} and adjacency matrix M ∈ ZN (M) = {(cid:126)z : ((cid:126)z, M) partitions Z (Ω) into at most N convex polygons} , equip ZN (M) with the sup norm (cid:107)·(cid:107), and note that ZN (M) is compact by Assump- tion 6. Let W ((cid:126)z, M) denote the minimal incentive cost for inducing high effort from both agents under the monitoring technology formed by ((cid:126)z, M). W ((cid:126)z, M) exists and is finite if and only if for all i = 1, 2, zi (A) (cid:54)≡ 0 across the performance category A's formed under ((cid:126)z, M). We proceed in two steps. Step 1 Show that W ((cid:126)z, M) is continuous in the first argument for any given N ∈ {2,··· , K} and M ∈ MN . Fix any (cid:126)z ∈ ZN (M) such that W ((cid:126)z, M) is finite. For sufficiently small δ > 0, let (cid:126)zδ be any element of ZN (M) such that (cid:107)(cid:126)zδ − (cid:126)z(cid:107) < δ. Label the performance n's, respectively, such that categories formed under ((cid:126)z, M) and(cid:0)(cid:126)zδ, M(cid:1) as An's and Aδ l is a vertex of cl(cid:0)Z(cid:0)Aδ n (cid:1)(cid:1). for n = 1, 2,··· , zl is a vertex of cl (Z (An)) if and only if zδ Let πn and zi,n (resp. πδ of An (resp. Aδ n and zδ n), respectively. Let wi,n denote the optimal wage of agent i at An. i,n) denote the probability (under a = 1) and zi-value Fix any > 0. Consider the wage profile that pays wi,n + /2 to agent i if zδ i,n > 0 and wi,n otherwise and therefore satisfies the (LLi) constraint. Under Assumptions 5 and 6, the (ICi) constraint is satisfied when δ is sufficiently small: πnu(cid:0)wi,n + 1zi,n>0 · /2(cid:1) zi,n > ci, i,n i,n 37 (cid:16) (cid:88) (cid:17) i,n>0 · /2 where the inequality holds because(cid:80) wi,n + 1zδ πδ i,nu lim δ→0 n (cid:88) n zδ i,n = In addition, since (cid:88) (cid:16) lim δ→0 πδ n wi,n + 1zδ n πnzi,n = 0 and zi,n (cid:54)≡ 0 so zi,n > 0 for some n. (cid:17) i,n>0 · /2 (cid:0)wi,n + 1zi,n>0 · /2(cid:1) , (cid:88) πn = it follows that when δ is sufficiently small, W(cid:0)(cid:126)zδ, M(cid:1) − W ((cid:126)z, M) ≤(cid:88) (cid:16) (cid:17) −(cid:88) i,n πδ n wi,n + 1zδ i,n>0 · /2 i,n πnwi,n < , where the first inequality holds because the constructed wage profile is not necessarily optimal under(cid:0)(cid:126)zδ, M(cid:1). Finally, interchanging the roles between (cid:126)zδ and (cid:126)z in the above derivation yields W ((cid:126)z, M)−W(cid:0)(cid:126)zδ, M(cid:1) < , implying that(cid:12)(cid:12)W(cid:0)(cid:126)zδ, M(cid:1) − W ((cid:126)z, M)(cid:12)(cid:12) < when δ is sufficiently small. Step 2 Under Assumption 4(a), the following quantity: WN := min M∈MN ,(cid:126)z∈ZN (M) W ((cid:126)z, M) exists and is finite for all N ∈ {2,··· , K} by Step 1, the compactness of ZN (M) and the finiteness of MN . Under Assumption 4(b), the principal's problem can be written as follows: min M∈MK ,(cid:126)z∈ZK (M) W ((cid:126)z, M) + µ · h (π ((cid:126)z, M)) , where π ((cid:126)z, M) is the probability vector formed under ((cid:126)z, M) and is clearly continuous in (cid:126)z. The remainder of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 2 and is therefore omitted. A.3 Proofs of Section 5 a∈D for any set A ∈ Σ of positive mea- (cid:62) In this appendix, write z (A) = (za (A)) sure, as well as any N -partitional contract (cid:104)P, w (·)(cid:105) as the corresponding tuple (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1, where An is a generic cell of P, πn = Pa∗ (An), zn = z (An) and wn = w (An). Assume w.l.o.g. that w1 ≤ ··· ≤ wN . A.3.1 Useful Lemma The next lemma generalizes Lemmas 1 and 2 to encompass multiple agents: Lemma 6. Assume Assumption 1. Then for any optimal incentive contract that induces a∗, (i) there exists λ ∈ RD + with (cid:107)λ(cid:107) > 0 such that u(cid:48) (wn) = 1/(cid:0)λ(cid:62)zn (cid:1) if 38 and only if wn > 0; (ii) λ(cid:62)z1 < 0 < λ(cid:62)z2 < ··· and 0 = w1 < w2 < ··· . Proof. The wage-minimization problem for given monitoring technology (cid:104)An, πn, zn(cid:105)N is n=1 (cid:88) πn wn −(cid:88) πnu ( wn) · λ(cid:62)zn −(cid:88) ηn wn, min(cid:104) wn(cid:105) n n n where λ denotes the profile of the Lagrange multipliers associated with the (ICa) constraints and ηn the Lagrange multiplier associated with the (LL) constraint at wn. Note that (cid:107)λ(cid:107) > 0, because otherwise all (ICa) constraints are slack and hence subtracting a small > 0 from all positive wages constitutes an improvement. Dif- ferentiating the objective function with respect to wn yields the first-order condition in Part (i). The proof of Part (ii) is the same as that of Lemma 2 and is therefore omitted. A.3.2 Proof of Theorem 5 Proof. Take any optimal incentive contract that induces a∗. Let (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N n=1 be the corresponding tuple and λ be the profile of the Lagrange multipliers as- sociated with the (ICa) constraints. Suppose, to the contrary, that some Aj is not Zλ-convex. Then there exist A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ Aj and A ⊂ Ak, k (cid:54)= j such that (i) Pa∗ (A(cid:48)) , Pa∗ (A(cid:48)(cid:48)) , Pa∗( A) > 0, and (ii) λ(cid:62)z = (1 − s) λ(cid:62)z(cid:48) + sλ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48), where (cid:54)= λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48) and s ∈ (0, 1). By Lemma 3, z(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)), z(cid:48)(cid:48) := z (A(cid:48)(cid:48)), z := z( A), λ(cid:62)z(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48)(cid:48) and for all ∈ (0, min{Pa∗ (A(cid:48)) , Pa∗ (A(cid:48)(cid:48)) , Pa∗( A)}), there exist A(cid:48) A ⊂ A such that (i) Pa∗ (A(cid:48) ) = λ(cid:62)z(cid:48), λ(cid:62)z (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ⊂ A(cid:48), A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = Pa∗( A) = , and (ii) λ(cid:62)z (A(cid:48) ) = Pa∗ (A(cid:48)(cid:48) ) = λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48) and λ(cid:62)z( A) = λ(cid:62)z. Consider two perturbations to the monitoring technology: (a) move A(cid:48) to Ak and A to Aj, and (b) move A to Aj and A(cid:48)(cid:48) to Ak. By Assumption 1, neither perturbation affects the probability distribution of the output signal under action a∗ and hence the monitoring cost. Below we demonstrate that one of them strictly reduces the incentive cost compared to the original (optimal) contract. Perturbation (a) Let (cid:104)An(), πn, zn ()(cid:105)N itoring technology after perturbation (a), where Aj () = (Aj ∪ A) \ A(cid:48) n=1 be the tuple associated with the mon- , Ak () = 39 (Ak ∪ A(cid:48) ) \ A and An () = An for n (cid:54)= j, k. Straightforward algebra shows that  zj () = zj + z( A) − z (A(cid:48) ) zk () = zk − z( A) − z (A(cid:48) πk zn () = zn ∀n (cid:54)= j, k, πj ) , , (A.10) and that (cid:107)z( A) − z (A(cid:48) )(cid:107) ≤ (cid:107)z( A)(cid:107) + (cid:107)z (A(cid:48) )(cid:107) ≤ 2 max ω∈Ω (cid:107)Z (ω)(cid:107). (A.11) Consider wage profile (cid:104)wn ()(cid:105)N constraints are slack by O () after the perturbation, i.e., n=1 such that (1) w1 () = w1 = 0 and (2) all (ICa) 0 ≤ N(cid:88) πnu (wn ()) za,n () − N(cid:88) n=1 n=1 πnu (wn) za,n ∼ O () ∀a ∈ D. (A.12) A close inspection of Equations (A.10)-(A.12) reveals the existence of M > 0 such that when is sufficiently small, there exist wage profiles as above that satisfy wn ()− wn < M for all n and hence the (LL) constraint.15 Write wn = (wn()− wn)/ and zn () = (zn () − zn) /. When is small, expand- ing Equation (A.12) using the twice-differentiability of u (·) and wn ()− wn ∼ O () and multiplying the result by λ yields N(cid:88) πn · u(cid:48) (wn) · λ(cid:62)zn · wn () = − N(cid:88) Simplifying using w1 () = 0, u(cid:48) (wn) = 1/(cid:0)λ(cid:62)zn n=1 n=1 u (wn) · πn · λ(cid:62) zn () + O () . (cid:1) for n ≥ 2 (Lemma 6) and Equation (A.10) yields N(cid:88) πn wn () = s (u (wk) − u (wj))(cid:0)λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48) − λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:1) + O () . (cid:110)(cid:104)xn(cid:105)N n=2 ∈ RN−1 :(cid:80)N (cid:110)(cid:104)xn(cid:105)N n=2 ∈ RN−1 :(cid:80)N n=2 πnu (wn) za,n and Sa = n=2 ∈ ∩a∈DSa. n=2 xnza,n ≥ κa (cid:111) If we cannot construct a wage profile n=2 xnza,n ≥ κa = and hence za(cid:48)(cid:48),n = −za(cid:48),n for n = 2,··· , N and κa(cid:48)(cid:48) = (A.13) (cid:111) n=2 xnza(cid:48),n = κa(cid:48) n=1 15To see why, define κa =(cid:80)N (cid:110)(cid:104)xn(cid:105)N n=2 ∈ RN−1 :(cid:80)N for each a ∈ D, and note that (cid:104)πnu (wn)(cid:105)N as above, then there exist a(cid:48), a(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ D such that ∩a=a(cid:48),a(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:111) −κa(cid:48). In the meantime, κa ≥ c (a∗) − c (a) > 0 for all a ∈ D, thus reaching a contradiction. 40 Perturbation (b) Repeating the above argument for perturbation (b) yields N(cid:88) πn wn () = − (1 − s) (u (wk) − u (wj))(cid:0)λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48) − λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:1) + O () . (A.14) n=1 Since u (wk) (cid:54)= u (wj) by Lemma 6 and λ(cid:62)z(cid:48)(cid:48) (cid:54)= λ(cid:62)z(cid:48) by assumption, the right-hand sides of Equations (A.13) and (A.14) have the opposite signs when is small. The remainder of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 1 and is therefore omitted. A.3.3 Proof of Theorem 6 Proof. Define Λ = λ : λ ∈ RD (cid:110) (cid:111) + and (cid:107)λ(cid:107)D = 1 , where (cid:107)·(cid:107)D denotes the D-dimensional Euclidean norm. By Theorem 5, any optimal captured by λ ∈ Λ and N − 1 cutpoints (cid:98)z1,··· ,(cid:98)zN−1 such that minω∈Ω λ(cid:62)Z (ω) ≤ monitoring technology with at most N ∈ {2,··· , K} performance categories is fully (cid:98)z1 ≤ ··· ≤(cid:98)zN−1 ≤ maxω∈Ω λ(cid:62)Z (ω). Write(cid:98)z = ((cid:98)z1,··· ,(cid:98)zN−1). Define (cid:26)(cid:98)z : min ω∈Ω ZN (λ) = λ(cid:62)Z (ω) ≤(cid:98)z1 ≤ ··· ≤(cid:98)zN−1 ≤ max ω∈Ω λ(cid:62)Z (ω) , (cid:27) We proceed in two steps. equip ZN (λ) with the sup norm (cid:107)·(cid:107), and note that ZN (λ) is compact by Assumption is necessary: otherwise there exists a ∈ D such that za (A) ≡ 0 across all performance 3. For any given pair (λ,(cid:98)z), write the minimal incentive cost for inducing a∗ as W (λ,(cid:98)z), and note that W (λ,(cid:98)z) exists and is finite if and only if λa > 0 for all a ∈ D and minω∈Ω λ(cid:62)Z (ω) <(cid:98)zn < maxω∈Ω λ(cid:62)Z (ω) for some n. The first condition category A's formed under (λ,(cid:98)z) and hence the (ICa) constraint will be violated. Step 1 Show that W (λ,(cid:98)z) is continuous in (λ,(cid:98)z) for any given N ∈ {2,··· , K}. Fix any λ ∈ Λ and(cid:98)z ∈ ZN (λ) such that W (λ,(cid:98)z) is finite. W.l.o.g. consider the case where (cid:98)zn's are all distinct. For sufficiently small δ > 0, let λδ and (cid:98)zδ be any (cid:0)λδ(cid:1), respectively, such that (cid:107)λδ − λ(cid:107)D, (cid:107)(cid:98)zδ −(cid:98)z(cid:107) < δ. Let πn values associated with performance category An =(cid:8)ω : λ(cid:62)Z (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zn−1,(cid:98)zn)(cid:9) (resp. n) denote the probability (under a = a∗) and D-vector of z- element of Λ and ZN and zn (resp. πδ n and zδ 41 n =(cid:8)ω : λδ(cid:62)Z (ω) ∈ [(cid:98)zδ n−1,(cid:98)zδ n)(cid:9)), respectively. Let wn denote the optimal wage at Aδ An. Fix any > 0, and consider the wage profile that pays wn + at Aδ a,n > 0 for all a ∈ D and wn otherwise. By construction, this wage profile satisfies the (LL) constraint. Under Assumptions 2 and 3, it satisfies every (ICa) constraint when δ is small: n if zδ (cid:89) (cid:89) a(cid:48)∈D (cid:33) >0 · (cid:33) 1za(cid:48),n>0 · 1zδ a(cid:48),n πδ nzδ a,n πnza,n lim δ→0 u wn + (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) n n n = > u wn + a(cid:48)∈D n πnza(cid:48),n = 0 and za(cid:48),n is strictly increasing a(cid:48)∈D 1za(cid:48),n>0 = 1. To complete the u (wn) πnza,n, (cid:32) proof, note that where the inequality holds because that(cid:80) in n for all a(cid:48) ∈ D so there exists n such that (cid:81) (cid:33) (cid:88) a,n>0 · 1zδ (cid:32) so the following holds when δ is sufficiently small: W(cid:0)λδ,(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) − W (λ,(cid:98)z) ≤(cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:89) (cid:89) wn + wn + lim δ→0 a∈D πδ n πδ n = n n (cid:32) πn wn + (cid:33) 1za,n>0 · , (cid:89) a∈D (cid:33) a,n>0 · 1zδ −(cid:88) Finally, interchanging the roles between (λ,(cid:98)z) and (cid:0)λδ,(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) in the above derivation yields W (λ,(cid:98)z) − W(cid:0)λδ,(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) < , implying that(cid:12)(cid:12)W(cid:0)λδ,(cid:98)zδ(cid:1) − W (λ,(cid:98)z)(cid:12)(cid:12) < when δ a∈D n n πnwn < . is sufficiently small. Step 2 Under Assumption 4(a), the following quantity: W (λ,(cid:98)z) WN := λ∈Λ,(cid:98)z∈ZN (λ) min 42 exists and is finite for all N ∈ {2,··· , K} by Step 1 and the compactness of Λ and ZN (λ). Under Assumption 4(b), the principal's problem can be written as follows: W (λ,(cid:98)z) + µ · h (π (λ,(cid:98)z)) , min λ∈Λ,z∈ZK (λ) where π (λ,(cid:98)z) denotes the probability vector formed under (λ,(cid:98)z) and is continuous in its argument. The remainder of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 2 and is therefore omitted. B Other Extensions B.1 Individual Rationality In this appendix, let everything be as in the baseline model except that the agent is constrained by individual rationality rather than limited liability: (cid:88) A∈P P1(A)u(w(A)) ≥ c + u. (IR) A wage scheme is w : P → R, and an optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent (optimal incentive contract for short) minimizes the total im- plementation cost, subject to the (IC) and (IR) constraints. Corollary 4. Under Assumption 1, any optimal monitoring technology that induces high effort from the agent comprises Z-convex cells. Proof. Take any optimal incentive contract and let (cid:104)An, πn, zn, wn(cid:105)N sponding tuple. Assume without loss of generality that z1 ≤ ··· ≤ zN . n=1 be the corre- Step 1 Show that z1 < ··· < zN and w1 < ··· < wN . The wage-minimization problem given (cid:104)An, πn, zn(cid:105)N (cid:32) N(cid:88) (cid:33) n=1 is (cid:32) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) min(cid:104) wn(cid:105) πn wn − λ πnu ( wn) zn − c − γ πnu ( wn) − (c + u) n=1 n=1 n=1 (cid:33) , where λ and γ denote the Lagrange multipliers associated with the (IC) and (IR) constraints, respectively. Differentiating the objective function with respect to wn 43 and setting the result equal to zero, we obtain u(cid:48) (wn) = 1 λzn + γ . Thus if zj = zk for some j (cid:54)= k, then wj = wk. But then merging Aj and Ak has no effect on the incentive cost but strictly reduces the monitoring cost by Assumption 1(b), a contradiction to the optimality of the original contract. Step 2 Show Z-convexity. Suppose, to the contrary, that some Aj is not Z-convex. Consider first perturba- n=1 such that the tion (a) in the proof of Theorem 1. Take any wage profile (cid:104)wn()(cid:105)N (IC) and (IR) constraints remain binding after the perturbation, i.e., N(cid:88) πnu (wn ()) zn () = πnu (wn) zn, (B.1) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) n=1 n=1 and n=1 N(cid:88) n=1 πnu (wn ()) = πnu (wn) . (B.2) A close inspection of Equations (A.1), (B.1) and (B.2) reveals the existence of M > 0 such that when is sufficiently small, there exist wage profiles as above such that wn () − wn < M for all n.16 Write wn () = (wn () − wn) / and zn () = (zn () − zn) /, and let λ > 0 and γ > 0 denote the Lagrange multipliers associated with the (IC) and (IR) constraints prior to the perturbation, respectively. Expanding λ (B.1)+γ (B.2) using the twice- differentiability of u (·) and wn ()− wn ∼ O () yields the following when is small: N(cid:88) (cid:110)(cid:104)xn(cid:105)N n=1 ∈ RN :(cid:80)N see why, 16To n=1 πn · u(cid:48) (wn) · (λzn + γ) · wn () = −λ define κ1 = (cid:80)N (cid:111) N(cid:88) u (wn) · πn zn () + O () . κ2 = (cid:80)N (cid:110)(cid:104)xn(cid:105)N n=1 ∈ RN :(cid:80)N n=1 xn ≥ κ2 (cid:111) n=1 (B.3) S1 = , and note that n=1 ∈ S1 ∩ S2. Then from z1 < ··· < zN , it follows that dimS1 ∩ S2 = N , and combining n=1 xnzn ≥ κ1 n=1 πnu (wn) zn, and S2 = n=1 πnu (wn), (cid:104)πnu (wn)(cid:105)N with Equation (A.1) gives the desired result. 44 Simplifying using u(cid:48) (wn) = 1/(λzn + γ) and Equation (A.1) yields πn wn () = s (u (wk) − u (wj)) (λz(cid:48)(cid:48) − λz(cid:48)) . (B.4) N(cid:88) n=1 N(cid:88) Consider next perturbation (b). Similar algebraic manipulation as above yields πn wn () = −(1 − s) (u (wk) − u (wj)) (λz(cid:48)(cid:48) − λz(cid:48)) . (B.5) n=1 Since u (wj) (cid:54)= u (wk) and z(cid:48)(cid:48) remainder of the proof is the same as that of Theorem 1. (cid:54)= z(cid:48), we must have sgn (B.4) (cid:54)= sgn (B.5), and the B.2 Random Monitoring Technology This appendix extends the baseline model to encompass random monitoring tech- nologies q : Ω → ∆K mapping raw data points to elements in the K-dimensional simplex. Time evolves as follows: 1. the principal commits to (cid:104)q, w(cid:105); 2. the agent privately chooses a ∈ {0, 1}; 3. Nature draws ω ∈ Ω according to Pa; 4. the monitoring technology outputs n ∈ {1,··· , K} with probability qn(ω); 5. the principal pays the promised wage wn ≥ 0. Under (cid:104)q, w(cid:105), the agent is assigned to performance category n with probability (cid:90) πn = qn(ω)dP1 (ω) if he exerts high effort. Define N = {n : πn > 0}. For n ∈ N , define (cid:90) zn = Z(ω)qn(ω)dP1(ω)/πn 45 as the z-value of performance category n. For n /∈ N , let wn = 0. Then (cid:104)q, w(cid:105) is incentive compatible if πnu (wn) zn ≥ c, (IC) (cid:88) n∈N in which case the monitoring cost is proportional to the mutual information of the raw data and output signal conditional on high effort: (cid:90) (cid:88) n∈N (cid:82) qn (ω) dP1 (ω) qn (ω) H (q, 1) = qn (ω) log dP1 (ω) . An optimal incentive contract (cid:104)q∗, w∗(cid:105) that induces high effort from the agent solves (cid:88) n∈N min(cid:104)q,w(cid:105) πnwn + µ · H(q, 1) s.t. (IC) and (LL). The next theorem gives characterizations of optimal incentive contracts: Theorem 7. For any optimal incentive contract (cid:104)q∗, w∗(cid:105) that induces high effort from the agent, we have (i) q∗ : Z (Ω) → ∆K; (ii) min{w∗ n : n ∈ N ∗} = 0; (iii) for all j, k ∈ N ∗, w∗ j (z) is strictly increasing in z if w∗ k and q∗ k (z) /q∗ j < w∗ k. j (cid:54)= w∗ Proof. Since the incentive cost is linear in q (ω) whereas the monitoring cost is convex k for all j, k ∈ N ∗. Write in q (ω), it follows that q∗ : Z (Ω) → ∆K and that w∗ N ∗ = {1,··· , N} and assume w.l.o.g. that w∗ N . Then w∗ 1 = 0 for the same reason as in proof of Lemma 2. Differentiating the principal's objective function with respect to q (z) yields the following first-order condition: j (cid:54)= w∗ 1 < ··· < w∗ (cid:19) − w∗ n + λu (w∗ n) z = µ log q∗ n (z) q∗ 1 (z) − log π∗ π∗ n 1 ∀n = 2,··· , N, (B.6) (cid:18) where λ > 0 denotes the Lagrange multiplier associated with the (IC) constraint. The left-hand side of Equation (B.6) is strictly increasing in z, thus proving Part (iii) of this theorem. The next theorem proves existence of optimal incentive contract: Theorem 8. Assume Assumptions 2 and 3. Then an optimal incentive contract that induces high effort from the agent exists. 46 Proof. For any given q, the wage-minimization problem admits solutions if and only if zj (cid:54)= zk for some j, k ∈ N , in which case we denote the minimal incentive cost by W (q). The principal's problem is W (q) + µ · H (q, 1) , min q and any solution of it must be continuous differentiable on Z (Ω) by Equation (B.6) and Assumptions 2 and 3 (taking the usual care of derivatives at end points). Define C 1(cid:0)Z (Ω) , ∆K(cid:1) as the set of q's as above and equip C 1(cid:0)Z (Ω) , ∆K(cid:1) with the sup n (z) − qn (z). Rewrite the principal's problem as norm (cid:107) · (cid:107), i.e., (cid:107)q(cid:48) − q(cid:107) = supz,n q(cid:48) follows: min q∈C1(Z(Ω),∆K ) W (q) + µ · H (q, 1) , and note that the objective function is continuous in q. To prove existence of solutions, note that W (q) + µ · H (q, 1) inf q∈C1(Z(Ω),∆K ) is a finite number, hereafter denoted by x. Let(cid:8)qk(cid:9) be any sequence in C 1(cid:0)Z (Ω) , ∆K(cid:1) such that limk→∞ W(cid:0)qk(cid:1) + µ · H(cid:0)qk, 1(cid:1) = x. Clearly, qk is uniformly bounded for all k, and the family(cid:8)qk(cid:9) is equicontinuous by Assumption 3 and the definition of C 1(cid:0)Z (Ω) , ∆K(cid:1). Thus, a subsequence of (cid:8)qk(cid:9) converges uniformly to some q∞ by Helly's selection theorem, and W (q∞) + µ · H (q∞, 1) = x by the continuity of the objective function. References Alchian, A. A., and H. Demsetz (1972): "Production, information costs, and economic organization," American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795. Baiman, S., and J. S. Demski (1980): "Economically optimal performance evalu- ation and control systems," Journal of Accounting Research, 18(S), 184-220. Bergemann, D., and S. Morris (2019): "Information design: a unifying perspec- tive," Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 44-95. 47 Blackwell, D. (1953): "Equivalent comparisons of experiments," Annals of Math- ematical Statistics, 24(2), 265-272. Bloom, N., B. Eifert, A. Mahajan, D. McKenzie, and J. Roberts (2013): "Does management matter? Evidence from India," Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics, 128(1), 1-51. Bloom, N., R. Sadun, and J. Van Reenen (2012): "Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle," American Economic Review, 102(1), 167-201. Bloom, N., and J. Van Reenen (2006): "Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries," Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, No. 716. -- -- -- (2007): "Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4): 1351-1408. -- -- -- (2010): "Why do management practices differ across countries?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203-224. Cover, T. M., and J. A. Thomas (2006): Elements of information theory, Hobo- ken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed. Cr´emer, J., L. Garicano, and A. Prat (2007): "Language and the theory of the firm," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 373-407. Dilm´e, F. (2017): "Optimal languages," Working Paper. Dye, R. A. (1986): "Optimal monitoring policies in agencies," The Rand Journal of Economics, 17(3), 339-350. Ewenstein, B., B. Hancock, and A. Komm (2016): "Ahead of the curve: the future of performance management," McKinsey Quarterly, May. Green, J. R., and N. L. Stokey (1983): "A comparison of tournaments and contracts," Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 349-364. Grossman, S. J., and O. D. Hart (1983): "An analysis of the principal-agent problem," Econometrica, 51(1), 7-45. 48 Kayyali, B., D. Knott, and S. Van Kuiken (2013): "The 'big data' revolution in healthcare," McKinsey Quarterly, January. Holmstrom, B. (1979): "Moral hazard and observability," The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91. -- -- -- (1982): "Moral hazard in teams," The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 324-340. Holmstrom, B., and P. Milgrom (1991): "Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7(S), 24-52. Hook, C., A. Jenkins, and M. Foot (2011): Introducing human resource man- agement, Pearson, 6th ed. Jager, G., L. P. Metzger, and F. Riedel (2011): "Voronoi languages: Equi- libria in cheap-talk games with high-dimensional signals and few signals," Games and Economic Behavior, 73(2), 517-537. Kaplan, E. (2015): "The spy who fired me: the human costs of workplace monitor- ing," Harper's Magazine, March. Kim, S. K. (1995): "Efficiency of an information system in an agency model," Econo- metrica, 63(1), 89-102. Lazear, E. P., and S. Rosen (1981): "Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts," Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864. Ma´ckowiak, B., and M. Wiederholt (2009): "Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention," American Economic Review, 99(3), 769-803. Martin, D. (2017): "Strategic pricing with rational inattention to quality," Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 131-145. Matejka, F., and A. McKay (2012): "Simple market equilibria with ratio- nally inattentive consumers," American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 102(3), 24-29. 49 Mookherjee, D. (1984): "Optimal incentive schemes with many agents," Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 433-446. Murff, H. J., F. FitzHenry, M. E. Matheny, N. Gentry, K. L. Kotter, K. Crimin, R. S. Dittus, A. K. Rosen, P. L. Elkin, S. H. Brown, and T. Speroff (2011): "Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing," Journal of Amer- ican Medical Association, 306(8), 848-855. Ravid, D. (2017): "Bargaining with rational inattention," Working Paper. Saint-Paul, G. (2017): "A "quantized" approach to rational inattention," European Economic Review, 100, 50-71. Shannon, C. E. (1948): "A mathematical theory of communication," Bell Labs Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. Sims, C. A. (1998): "Stickiness," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 49, 317-356. -- -- -- (2003): "Implications of rational inattention," Journal of Monetary Eco- nomics, 50(3), 665-690. Singer, N. (2013): "In a mood? Call center agents can tell," New York Times, October 12. Sobel, J. (2015): "Broad terms and organizational codes," Working Paper. Woodford, M. D. (2009): "Information-constrained state-dependent pricing," Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(S), S100-S124. Yang, M. (2019): "Optimality of debt under flexible information acquisition," Re- view of Economic Studies, forthcoming. 50
1906.11224	1	1906	2019-06-26T17:34:22	The Hamiltonian approach to the problem of derivation of production functions in economic growth theory	[ "econ.TH", "math.SG" ]	We introduce a general Hamiltonian framework that appears to be a natural setting for the derivation of various production functions in economic growth theory, starting with the celebrated Cobb-Douglas function. Employing our method, we investigate some existing models and propose a new one as special cases of the general $n$-dimensional Lotka-Volterra system of eco-dynamics.	econ.TH	econ	The Hamiltonian approach to the problem of derivation of production functions in economic growth theory Roman G. Smirnov∗ and Kunpeng Wang† Department of Mathematics and Statistics Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3J5 June 27, 2019 Abstract 9 1 0 2 n u J 6 2 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 4 2 2 1 1 . 6 0 9 1 : v i X r a We introduce a general Hamiltonian framework that appears to be a natural setting for the derivation of various production functions in economic growth theory, starting with the celebrated Cobb-Douglas function. Employing our method, we investigate some existing models and propose a new one as special cases of the general n-dimensional Lotka-Volterra system of eco-dynamics. 1 Introduction As is well known, both mathematicians and economists have been using various methods to derive production functions in economic growth theory ranging from data analysis [1, 2] to symmetry and Lie group theory methods [3, 4]. In this paper we will enlarge the set of available tools by incorporating a Hamiltonian formalism into the theory. To show the workings of the Hamiltonian formalism in the study of technical progress and production functions in economics, let us recall first that symmetry methods have already proven to be a very powerful tool in this context, which was demonstrated ∗e-mail: [email protected] †e-mail: [email protected] 1 by Sato [3] (see also Sato and Ramachandran [4], the relevant references in [5], and, for example, Perets and Yashiv [6]). In particular, the authors in [5] have extended Sato's approach to derive a new family of production functions under the assumption of logistic growth in factors. It is our contention that the theory can be further developed at this point by recasting its setting within a Hamiltonian framework. More specifically, we will redefine the existing models [3, 5] and introduce a new one by presenting them as special cases of the general n-dimensional Lotka-Volterra model in population dynamics (see, for example, Kerner [7] and the relevant references therein). This model is given by the following formula: xi = xi bi + aijxj! , n Xj=1 i = 1, . . . , n, (1.1) where the linear terms describe the Malthusian growth (or decay) of the species in question x1, . . . , xn in the absence of interaction (i.e., when the parameters aij all vanish), while the quadratic terms tell us about the binary interraction between the species, assuming spatial homogeneity. More specifically, aij = 1 αij, where βi is βi Volterra's "equivalent number" parameter that has the meaning of mean effective biomass of the individuals in the ith species, while αij is normally assumed to be a skew-symmetric matrix representing the interaction strength of species i with species j [7]. We recall that the Lotka-Volterra systems with vanishing linear terms (i.e., when bi = 0, i = 1, . . . , n in (1.1)), as well as their integrable perturbations are an important and well-studied topic in the field of mathematical physics, in particular, they appear as discretizations of the KdV equation (see, for example, Bogoyavlenskij et al [8] and Damianou et al [9] for more details and references). Furthermore, Plank [10, 11] (see also Kerner [14]) studied general n-dimensional Lotra-Volterra systems from the Hamiltonian viewpoint and found bi-Hamiltonian formulations for particular 3-dimensional model (1.1). In what follows we will adapt some of these results to the problem of the deter- mination of a production function under the assumption of a holothetic growth in factors. 2 The Hamiltonian formalism via Poisson geome- try All models that we discuss in this paper will be studied within the framework of the Hamiltonian systems defined on Poisson manifolds. Recall that a Poisson structure 2 on a manifold M is a skew-symmetric R-bilinear bracket satisfying the Leibnitz rule and the Jacobi identity {·, ·} : C ∞ × C ∞ → C ∞, {f, gh} = {f, g}h + g{f, h} {f, {g, h}} + {h, {f, g}} + {g, {h, f }} = 0, for all f, g, h ∈ C ∞(M). The pair of a manifold M and a Poisson structure defined on M is called a Poisson manifold. Next, let (M, {·, ·}) be a Poisson manifold, then the vector field Xf given by Xf = {f, ·} is called the Hamiltonian vector field determined by the Hamiltonian function f . Note that the value of {f, g} at any point p ∈ M depends linearly on the differentials df, dg at p ∈ M. In this view, the bracket {·, ·} gives rise to a Poisson bi-vector field π ∈ X2(M) = Γ(Λ2T M) such that π(df, dg) = {f, g}, for all f, g ∈ C ∞(M). Conversely, given a Poisson bi-vector π ∈ Γ(Λ2T M), then π defines the corresponding Poisson bracket satisfying the properties specified above. In what follows we will refer to a Poisson manifold as a pair (M, π), which gives rise to the following definition of a Hamiltonian vector field or, in terms of local coordinates (x1, . . . , xn) near p ∈ M, Xf = πdf, f = πiℓ ∂f X i ∂xℓ , (2.1) (2.2) f , . . . , X n where Xf = (X 1 f ) and n = dim M. See, for example, Fernandes and Marcut, [15] for more details. We note, however, that most of the above formulas can be represented in a uniform way via the Schouten bracket [·, ·] [16]. Thus, for instance, the Jacobi identity condition for a Poisson bracket {·, ·} defined by a Poisson bi- vector π is simply equivalent to the condition [π, π] = 0. A Hamiltonian vector field Xf defined on a Poisson manifold (M, π) can be now determined as Xf = [π, f ]. 3 Similarly, the Poisson bracket of any functions f, g ∈ C ∞(M) defined on a Poisson manifold (M, π) may be defined via the Schouten bracket as {f, g} = [[π, f ], g] and so on (see, for example, [17] for more details). We note that the Hamiltonian for- malism determined within the framework of Poisson geometry is a preferred choice for the investigation of the models related to the Lotka-Volterra system. Indeed, when the number of species n in (1.1) is odd, it is not possible to employ the Hamil- tonian formalism via symplectic geometry, since a symplectic form is by definition non-degenerate, while a Poisson bi-vector π defined above may be degenerate. 3 Sato's model Recall, Sato [3] (see also pp. 4-5 in [5]) employed Lie group theory methods to derive the Cobb-Douglas function as an invariant of a one parameter group action determined by exponential growth in labor, capital, and production. His other goal was to resolve the Solow-Stigler controversy [3, 18] that can be described as the observation that the increase of output is not proportional to the growth of labor and capital in the production function, which, in turn, implies that the technical progress should also be taken into the account in the development of any growth model. The assumption that labor, capital, and production grow exponentially leads to a simple dynamical system, which we can interpret as a special case of the system (1.1). Indeed, in (1.1) let n = 3 and the parameters aij all vanish. Then, we have xi = bixi, i = 1, 2, 3, (3.1) where x1 = L (labor), x2 = K (capital), x3 = f (production), b1 = b, b2 = a and b3 = 1 in Sato's notations. Next, employing the approach presented in [11] mutatis mutandis (see also [12, 13] for more details), we rewrite (3.1) as the following Hamiltonian system: xi = X i H = πiℓ 1 , i = 1, 2, 3. ∂H ∂xℓ Here π = −xixj ∂ ∂xi ∧ ∂ ∂xj , i, j = 1, 2, 3 is the quadratic (degenerate) Poisson bi-vector that defines the Hamiltonian function ck ln xk H = 3 Xk=1 4 (3.4) (3.2) (3.3) via XH = [π, H], in which the parameters ck are solutions to the rank 2 algebraic system Ac = b determined by the skew-symmetric 3 × 3 matrix A A =  0 −1 −1 0 −1 1 1 1 0   , c = [c1, c2, c3]T with all ck > 0, and b = [b1, b2, b3]T , satisfying the condition b1 + b3 = b2. (3.5) We observe next that divXH = b1 + b2 + b3, which implies that the Hamiltonian vector field XH defined above is not incompressible. In particular, if all of the "growth" parameters b1, b2, b3 > 0, the economy, interpreted as a volume-element, grows. We also note that the vector field XH is irrotational, i.e., ∇ × XH = 0, that is XH is a conservative vector field. Indeed, XH = ∇f , where f (x1, x2, x3) = 1 2(b1x2 Alternatively, we can introduce the following new variables 2 + b3x2 1 + b2x2 3). which lead to an even simpler form of the system (3.1), namely vi = ln xi, i = 1, 2, 3, vi = bi, i = 1, 2, 3. (3.6) (3.7) Interestingly, the substitution (3.6) is exactly the one used by Cobb and Douglas in [1] to derive the celebrated Cobb-Douglas production function (3.8). More specifically, they graphed the three functions v1, v2 and v3, coming from specific data (i.e., specific variables representing "labor force" L, "fixed capital" K, and "physical product" f determined by E. E. Day's index of the physical volume of the US production for the years 1899-1922), and observed the correlations that led to the introduction of the function (3.8) for A = 1.01, α = 3/4, and β = 1/4. Note that (3.7) is also a Hamiltonian system, provided b1 + b3 = b2, defined by the corresponding (degenerate) Poission bi-vector π with components πij = − ∂ ∂vi ∧ ∂ ∂vj and the corresponding Hamiltonian ckvk. H = 3 Xk=1 5 Observing that the function H given by (3.4) is a constant of the motion of the k=1 ck ln xk = H = const Hamiltonian system (3.2), and then solving the equation P3 for x3, we arrive at the celebrated Cobb-Douglas production function Y = f (L, K) = ALαK β, (3.8) after the identification x1 = L, x2 = K, x3 = f , A = exp(cid:16) H1 c3 Note that the elastisities of substitution α and β, satisfying the condition c3(cid:17), α = − c1 , β = − c2 c3 . α + β = 1, (3.9) assure that the production function enjoys constant return to scale. In order to make sure that the Cobb-Douglas function (3.8) derived analytically under the assump- tion that labor, capital, and production grow exponentially satisfies the condition (3.9), Sato [3] introduced the "simultaneous holotheticity condition", from which an aggregate production function (3.8) satisfying (3.9) could be derived. Mathemati- cally, this condition is equivalent to the existence of a two-dimensional integrable distribution that represents simultaneous technical change in two sectors of economy that are characterized by the same aggregate production function. We will use the bi-Hamiltonian approach (see, for example, [11, 17] for more details; to learn more about the origins of the theory -- see [19]) to derive the Cobb-Douglas function (3.8), satisfying (3.9). Following the bi-Hamiltonian treatment of three-dimensional Lotka-Volterra systems presented in [11], we introduce the following bi-Hamiltonian structure for the dynamical system (3.1): xi = XH1,H2 = [π1, H1] = [π2, H2], i = 1, 2, 3, (3.10) where the Hamiltonian functions H1 and H1 are given by H1 = b ln x1 + ln x2 + a ln x3, H2 = ln x1 + a ln x2 + b ln x3. (3.11) (3.12) The Hamiltonian functions H1 and H2 correspond to the Poisson bi-vectors π1 and π2 π1 = aijxixj , i, j = 1, 2, 3 ∂ ∂xi ∧ ∂ ∂xj and π2 = bijxixj ∂ ∂xi ∧ ∂ ∂xj , i, j = 1, 2, 3 6 (3.13) (3.14) respectively under the conditions (cid:26) bb1 + b2 + ab3 = 0, b1 + ab2 + b3b = 0. (3.15) Note the conditions (3.15) (compare them to (3.5)) assure that π1 and π2 are indeed Poisson bi-vectors compatible with the dynamics of (3.1) and corresponding to the Hamiltonians (3.11) and (3.12) respectively. Solving the linear system (3.15) for a and b under the additional condition b1b2 − b2 3 6= 0, we arrive at a = b2b3 − b2 1 b1b2 − b2 3 , b = b1b3 − b2 2 b1b2 − b2 3 . (3.16) Consider now the first integral H3 given by H3 = H1 − H2 = (b − 1) ln x1 + (1 − a) ln x2 + (a − b) ln x3. (3.17) Solving the equation (3.17) for x3, we arrive at the Cobb-Douglas function (3.8) with the elastisities of substitution α and β given by α = a − 1 a − b , β = 1 − b a − b , where a and b are given by (3.16). Note α + β = 1, as expected. Also, α, β > 0 under the additonal condition b2 > b3 > b1, which implies by (3.1) that capital (x2 = K) grows faster than production (x3 = f ), which, in turn, grows faster than labor (x1 = L). We conclude, therefore, that the existence of a bi-Hamiltonian structure was crucial for our considerations, because it enabled us to produce a unique pair of acceptable, from the economic viewpoint elasticities of substitution α and β in (3.8) directly from the parameters b1, b2 and b3 that determined the dynamics of the system (3.1). 4 The logistic growth model Recall that the authors extended Sato's approach in [5], replacing the assumption about exponential growth in labor, capital and production with the corresponding assumption that labor, capital, and production grow logistically, arriving, as a result, at the following dynamical system xi = bixi(cid:18)1 − xi Ni(cid:19) , 7 i = 1, 2, 3, (4.1) where x1 = L (labor), x2 = K (capital), x3 = f (production), b1 = b, b2 = a, and b3 = 1 in Sato's notations, adopted in [5], and the parameters Ni denote the corresponding carrying capacities. Furthermore, we employed Sato's approach [3] to integrate this dynamical system and thus derive a new production function (see (4.5) in [5]). We will now use the Hamiltonian approach by treating the system (4.1) as a particular case of the general Lotka-Volterra system (1.1) and, therefore, a Hamiltonian system as such. Indeed, we first note that in this case n = 3 and the 3 × 3 matrix determined by the parameters aij in (1.1) is diagonal, with aii = − bi . Ni Following [14], we rewrite the system (4.1) in terms of the new variables given by xi = Nievi, i = 1, 2, 3, which yields vi = bi(1 − evi), i = 1, 2, 3. (4.2) We also introduce the (degenerate) Poisson bi-vector π3 π3 = −(1 − evi)(1 − evj ) ∂ ∂vi ∧ ∂ ∂vj , i, j = 1, 2, 3. (4.3) Note, the (2, 0)-tensor π3 is skew-symmetric and satisfies the condition [π3, π3] = 0, where [·, ·] denotes the Schouten bracket [16]. The corresponding Hamiltonian function H3, satisfying the equation vi = V i H3 = πiℓ 3 ∂ H3 ∂vℓ , i = 1, 2, 3, is found to be 3 H3 = ck (vk − ln(1 − evk)) , (4.4) or, in terms of the original variables, Xk=1 Next, solving the equation 3 H3 = 3 Xk=1 ck ln xk Nk − xk . ck ln xk Nk − xk = H3 = const Xk=1 for x3 and indentifying x1 = L, x2 = K, x3 = f , N1 = NL, N2 = NK, N3 = Nf , − c1 c3 = β, e−H2/c3 = C, we arrive at the production function = α, − c2 c3 Y = f (L, K) = Nf LαK β CNL − LαNK − Kβ + LαK β (4.5) 8 derived in [5]. Recall that a similar, "S-shaped" production function Y = g(L, K) = aLpK 1−p 1 + bLpK 1−p (4.6) was recently introduced, employing a heuristic approach, see [20, 21, 22, 23] and the relevant references therein for more details and applications. Note that the production function (4.6) is reducible to the Cobb-Douglas function (3.8) (i.e., when b = 0). Also, we observe that the new production function (4.5) is reducible to the production function (4.6) when K and L ≪ NK and NL respectively, NL, NK ≈ 1, C = 1 in (4.5) and a = Nf , b = 1 in (4.6) . 5 A new model involving debt In what follows, we employ the well-established variables used in modelling processes in economic growth theory, namely L (labor), K (capital), f (production), and we introduce in addition, a new variable D (debt). Note that treating debt as an independent variable is a novel but already acceptable practice in economic modelling (see, for example, [24]). We shall assume that debt and capital interact in a way similar to the predator-pray collisions in eco-dynamics [7]. More specifically, we assume that in the absence of capital, debt grows exponentially and vice versa -- when debt is absent, capital also grows exponentially. At the same time, more capital can "eat" debt (i.e., the debt gets paid off), while more debt diminishes by the same token any disposable income (capital). As for production and labor, we shall assume they grow logistically. Therefore, we consider the following 4-dimensional dynamical system: x1 = x1(b1 + a12x2), x2 = x2(b2 + a21x1), (5.1) x3 = x3b3(cid:16)1 − x3 N3(cid:17) , N4(cid:17) , x4 = x4b4(cid:16)1 − x4 where x1 = K, x2 = D, x3 = f , x4 = L, N3 = Nf , N4 = NL. Not that the system (5.1) is also a special case of the n-dimensional Lotka-Volterra model (1.1). , v4 = ln x4 , N4 N3 Changing the variables v1 = ln(cid:16)− a12 b1 and assuming a12b1, a21b2 < 0, yields the Hamiltonian system x1(cid:17), v2 = ln(cid:16)− a21 b2 x2(cid:17), v3 = ln x3 vi = V i H4 = πiℓ 4 i = 1, 2, 3, 4, (5.2) ∂H4 ∂vℓ , 9 where the Hamiltonian function is given by H4 = b1(v2 − ev2) − b2(v1 − ev1)+ 1 b3 (v3 − ln(1 − ev3)) − 1 b4 (v4 − ln(1 − ev4)) , corresponding to the Poisson bi-vector π4 = πij 4 ∂ ∂vi ∧ ∂ ∂vj , (5.3) (5.4) 4 = −b3b4(1 − ev3)(1 − ev4) with non-zero components: π12 (All other components vanish). Solving the equation (5.3) for f , we arrive at the following new production function that accounts for interactions between K (capital) and D (debt) 4 = −1, π34 4 = −π43 4 = −π21 Y = f (L, K, D) = Nf eb3G(L,K,D) 1 + eb3G(L,K,D) , (5.5) where the fuction G is given by G = C − b1(cid:20)ln(cid:18)− a21 b2 D(cid:19) + a21 b2 D(cid:21) + b2(cid:20)ln(cid:18)− a12 b1 K(cid:19) + a12 b1 K(cid:21) + 1 b4 ln , C ∈ R. L NL − L 6 Concluding remarks Mathematicians often say that "a mathematical problem is essentially solved when it is reduced to an algebraic problem." In this paper the authors have reduced several problems of the derivation of a production function to the corresponding algebraic problems by employing the Hamiltonian approach and describing the dynamics in question in each case as a special case of the Lotka-Volterra model (1.1). In par- ticular, we have rederived the celebrated Cobb-Douglas production function (3.8) with economically acceptable elasticities of substitution as a linear combination of two Hamiltonians of the bi-Hamiltonian structure (3.10) defined by two quadratic (degenerate) Poisson bi-vectors. Our next model came from a recent paper [5] in which we extended Sato's ideas coming from the Lie group theoretical framework for the theory of endogeneous technical progress developed in [3] and [4] by assuming logistic rather than exponential growth in factors. In this case too, we identified the 10 corresponding dynamical system as a special case of the Lotka-Volterra model (1.1) and a Hamiltonian system as such, which enabled us to derive the corresponding production function (4.5) as a Hamiltonian. The last model presented in this paper is new -- we have introduced an additional variable (debt) and described the dy- namics built around the "predator-prey" type interaction between capital and debt also as a special case of the Lotka-Volterra model (1.1), which ultimately led to the derivation of a new production function (5.5). Further analysis of the models studied in this paper, as well as their generaliza- tions, using quantitative and qualitative research methods, including the methods of statistical mechanics, will be presented in a forthcoming article by the authors. References [1] Cobb, C. W. Douglas, P. H., 1928. A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18 (Supplement), 139 -- 165. [2] Douglas, P. H., 1976. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing and some new empirical values, J. Polit. Econ. 84 (51), 903 -- 915. [3] Sato, R., 1981. Theory of Technical Change and Economic Invariance. Academic Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. [4] Sato, R., Ramachandran, R. V., 2014. Symmetry and Economic Invariance (2nd edition). Springer. New York. [5] Smirnov, R. G., Wang, K., 2019. In search of a new economic model determined by logistic growth. E. Journal Appl. Math. 30 pp. [6] Perets, G., Yashiv, E., 2018. Lie symmetries and essential restrictions in eco- nomic optimization. CEPR Discussion Papers 12611. C.E.P.R. Discussion Pa- pers. [7] Kerner, E. H., 1972. Gibbs Ensemble: Biological Ensemble. The Application of Statistical Mechanics to Ecological, Neural, and Biological Networks. Interna- tional Science Review Series, 12. Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers. New York. [8] Bogoyavlenskij, O. I., Itoh, Y., Yukawa, T., 2008. Lotka-Volterra systems inte- grable in quadratures. J. Math. Phys. 49(5). 053501. 6pp. 11 [9] Damianou, P. A., Evripidou, C. A., Kassotakis, P., Vanhaecke, P., 2017. Inte- grable reductions of the Bogoyavlenskij-Itoh Lotka-Volterra systems. J. Math. Phys. 58(3). 032704. 17 pp. [10] Plank, M., 1995. Hamiltonian structures for the n-dimensional Lotka-Volterra equations. J. Math. Phys. 36(7). 3520 -- 3534. [11] Plank, M., 1996. Bi-Hamiltonian systems and Lotka-Volterra equations: A three-dimensional classification. Nonlinearity 9(4). 887 -- 896. [12] Bhaskara, K. H., Rama, K., 1991. Quadratic Poisson structures. J. Math. Phys. 32(9). 2319 -- 2322. [13] Damianou, P. A., Petalidou, F., 2014. On the Liouville integrability of Lotka- Volterra systems. Frontiers in Physics. 2. Article 50. 10 pp. [14] Kerner, E. H., 1996. Comment on Hamiltonian structures for the n-dimensional Lotka-Volterra equations. J. Math. Phys. 38(2). 1218 -- 1223. [15] Fernandes, R. L., Marcut, , I., 2015. Lectures on Poisson Geometry. Preprint. [16] Schouten, J. A., 1940. Uber Differentalkomitanten zweier kontravarianter Grossen, Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Amsterdam 43. 449 -- 452. [17] Smirnov, R. G., 1997. Bi-Hamiltonian formalism: a constructive approach. Lett. Math. Phys. 41(4). 333 -- 347. [18] Solow, R. M., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics 70(1). 65 -- 94. [19] Praught, J., Smirnov, R. G., 2005. Andrew Lenard: A mystery unraveled. SIGMA 1. 7 pp. [20] Anita, S., Capasso, V., Kunze, H., La Torre, D., 2013. Optimal control and long-run dynamics for spatial economic growth model with physical capital ac- cumulation and pollution diffusion. Appl. Math. Lett. 26. 908912. [21] Capasso, V., Engbers, R., La Torre, D., 2012. Population dynamics in a spatial Solow model with a convexconcave production function. In: Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (editors), Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer. Milano. 61 -- 68. 12 [22] Engbers, R., Burger, M., Capasso, V., 2014. Inverse problems in geographical economics: Parameter identification in the spatial Solow model. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 372. 20130402. [23] La Torre, D., Liuzzi, D., Marsiglio, S., 2015. Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over time. Math. Soc. Sci. 78. 48 -- 63. [24] Afonso, A., Jalles, J., 2013. Growth and productivity: The role of government debt, Int. Rev. Econ. Finance 25. 384 -- 407. 13
1910.13237	1	1910	2019-10-29T12:59:16	Lexicographic Choice Under Variable Capacity Constraints	[ "econ.TH" ]	In several matching markets, in order to achieve diversity, agents' priorities are allowed to vary across an institution's available seats, and the institution is let to choose agents in a lexicographic fashion based on a predetermined ordering of the seats, called a (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rule. We provide a characterization of lexicographic choice rules and a characterization of deferred acceptance mechanisms that operate based on a lexicographic choice structure under variable capacity constraints. We discuss some implications for the Boston school choice system and show that our analysis can be helpful in applications to select among plausible choice rules.	econ.TH	econ	Lexicographic Choice Under Variable Capacity Constraints∗ Battal Dogan† Serhat Dogan ‡ Kemal Yıldız§ October 30, 2019 Abstract In several matching markets, in order to achieve diversity, agents' priorities are allowed to vary across an institution's available seats, and the institution is let to choose agents in a lexicographic fashion based on a predetermined ordering of the seats, called a (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rule. We provide a charac- terization of lexicographic choice rules and a characterization of deferred acceptance mechanisms that operate based on a lexicographic choice structure under variable ca- pacity constraints. We discuss some implications for the Boston school choice system and show that our analysis can be helpful in applications to select among plausible choice rules. JEL Classification Numbers: C78, D47, D78. Keywords: Choice rules, lexicographic choice, deferred acceptance, diversity. ∗Battal Dogan gratefully acknowledges financial support from the British Academy/Leverhulme Trust through grant SR1819\190133 and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through grant 100018 162606. Kemal Yıldız gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). We thank Mustafa Oguz Afacan, Samson Alva, Bettina Klaus, Bumin Yenmez, seminar participants at ITU Matching Workshop, Tel Aviv University, BRIC London 2017, and anonymous referees for valuable comments. †Department of Economics, University of Bristol; [email protected]. ‡Department of Economics, Bilkent University; [email protected]. §Department of Economics, Bilkent University; [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction Many real-life resource allocation problems involve the allocation of an object that is available in a limited number of identical copies, called the capacity of the object. Choice rules, which are systematic ways of rationing available copies of an object when demand exceeds the capacity, are essential in the analysis of such problems. A well-known example is the school choice problem in which each school has a certain number of seats to be allocated among students. Although student preferences are elicited from the students, endowing each school with a choice rule is an essential part of the design process. Which choice rule to use is not always evident. The school choice literature, start- ing with the seminal study by Abdulkadiroglu and Sonmez (2003), has widely focused on problems where each school is already endowed with a priority ordering over students and chooses the highest priority students up to the capacity. Such a choice rule, which is merely responsive to a given priority ordering, is called a responsive choice rule.1 However, when there are additional concerns such as achieving a diverse student body or affirmative action, which choice rule to use is non-trivial. For example in the Boston school choice system, although each school is still endowed with a priority ordering over students and respecting student priorities is still a concern, schools would like to promote the neighbor- hood students as well by sometimes letting them override the priorities of students who are not from the neighborhood. Such an objective can obviously not be achieved with a responsive choice rule. The affirmative action policies that are in use in several school districts2 reveal that a natural way to achieve diversity is to allow students' priorities to vary across a school's seats, and to let the school choose students in a lexicographic fashion based on a pre- determined ordering of the seats. We call these rules (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rules.3 To be more precise, a lexicographic choice rule specifies an ordering of the 1In Appendix D, we discuss responsive choice rules. 2In order to achieve a diverse student body, many school districts have been implementing affirmative action policies, such as in Boston, Chicago, and Jefferson County. 3These choice rules are simply called lexicographic choice rules in the recent market design literature. We introduce these choice rules using the capacity-constrained lexicographic choice terminology to differ- entiate them from other lexicographic choice rules without capacity constraints which have been studied in the choice theory literature. Although we omit the "capacity-constrained" part for simplicity in most part of the paper, we include it in the statements of our results. 2 seats and assigns a priority ordering to each seat, which can be interpreted as the crite- rion based on which that particular seat will be assigned. At each choice set, the highest priority student according to the priority ordering at the first seat is chosen, then the highest priority ordering among the remaining students according to the priority ordering at the second seat is chosen, and so on until the last seat is assigned or no student is left. Although some properties of lexicographic choice rules have already been studied in the literature, which set of properties distinguish lexicographic choice rules from other plausible choice rules has so far not been studied.4 In this study, we follow the axiomatic approach and discover general principles (axioms) that characterize lexicographic choice rules under variable capacity constraints.5 In our baseline model, we consider a single decision maker who has a capacity con- straint, such as a school with a limited number of seats. The decision maker encounters choice problems which consist of a choice set (a set of alternatives, such as students who demand a seat at the school) and a capacity. A choice rule, at each possible choice prob- lem, chooses some alternatives from the choice set without exceeding the capacity. Note that across different choice problems, we allow capacity to vary, since in applications ca- pacity may vary and the choice rule may need to be responsive to changes in capacity.6 One example is when the number of available seats at a school may change from year to year. In fact, even during the same admissions year, a school may face two different choice problems with different capacities. In most of the existing school choice systems, such as New York City and Boston, there is a second stage of admissions including those students and school seats that are unassigned at the end of the first stage.7 We consider the following three properties of choice rules that have already been studied in the axiomatic literature. Capacity-filling:8 An alternative is rejected from a choice set at a capacity only if the 4Although lexicographic choice rules are used to achieve diversity in school choice, there are other plausible choice rules that are also used, or can be used, to achieve diversity or affirmative action. Among others, Echenique and Yenmez (2015) and Ehlers et al. (2014) study some of those choice rules. 5Echenique and Yenmez (2015) also follow an axiomatic approach and characterize several choice rules for a school that wants to achieve diversity. 6There are earlier studies in the literature which also formulate choice rules by allowing capacity to vary. See, among others, Dogan and Klaus (2018), Ehlers and Klaus (2014), and Ehlers and Klaus (2016). 7The new school choice system in Chicago also has two stages of admissions. See Dogan and Yenmez (2019) for an analysis of the new system in Chicago. 8In the matching literature, capacity-filling is also referred to as acceptance, although the capacity-filling 3 capacity is full; Gross substitutes: If an alternative is chosen from a choice set at a capacity, then it is also chosen from any subset of the choice set that contains the alternative, at the same capacity. Monotonicity: If an alternative is chosen from a choice set at a capacity, then it is also chosen from the same choice set at any higher capacity. We introduce a new property called the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. The irrelevance of accepted alternatives requires that, if the set of rejected alternatives is the same for two choice sets at the same capacity, then at any higher capacity, the set of accepted alternatives that were formerly rejected should be the same for the two choice sets. In other words, in case of an increase in the capacity, the irrelevance of accepted alternatives requires that the new alternatives that will be chosen (if any) should not depend on the already accepted alternatives. In Theorem 1, we show that a choice rule satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonicity, and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives if and only if it is lexicographic: there exists a list of priority orderings over potential alternatives such that at each choice problem, the set of chosen alternatives is obtainable by choosing, first, the highest ranked alternative according to the first priority ordering, then choosing the highest ranked alternative among the remaining alternatives according to the second priority ordering, and proceeding similarly until the capacity is full or no alternative is left. Besides providing a first axiomatic foundation for lexicographic choice rules under variable capacity constraints, we also analyze the market design implications of lexico- graphic choice rules. In Section 4, we consider the variable-capacity object allocation model where there is more than one object (such as many schools) and agents have pref- erences over objects (such as students having preferences over schools). In that model, Ehlers and Klaus (2016) characterize deferred acceptance mechanisms where each object has a choice rule that satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and monotonicity.9 Mo- tivated by the irrelevance of accepted alternatives for choice rules, we introduce a new terminology has been increasingly popular in the recent literature. 9Kojima and Manea (2010) consider a setup where the capacity of each school is fixed, and characterize deferred acceptance mechanisms where each school has a choice rule that satisfies capacity-filling and gross substitutes. 4 property for allocation mechanisms, called the irrelevance of satisfied demand. Consider an arbitrary problem and the allocation chosen by the mechanism at that problem. Sup- pose that the capacity of an object is increased. Now, some of the agents who prefer that object to their assignments at the initial allocation may receive the object due to the capac- ity increase. The irrelevance of satisfied demand requires that the set of agents who receive the object due to the capacity increase does not depend on the set of agents who initially receive the object. We show that there is no mechanism which satisfies the irrelevance of satisfied demand together with some other desirable properties studied in Ehlers and Klaus (2016) (Proposition 3). In particular, lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanisms, which are deferred acceptance mechanisms that operate based on a lexicographic choice struc- ture, violate the irrelevance of satisfied demand, which stands in contrast to lexicographic choice rules satisfying the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. However, we show that a weaker version of the irrelevance of satisfied demand -- which requires the same at any problem where there is only one available object -- characterizes lexicographic deferred ac- ceptance mechanisms together with the desirable properties studied in Ehlers and Klaus (2016) (Proposition 4). Kominers and Sonmez (2016) study lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanisms in a more general matching with contracts framework (Hatfield and Milgrom, 2005). In some applications, the choice rule of an institution is subject to a feasibility constraint, in the sense that some alternatives cannot be chosen together with some other alternatives. The matching with contracts model due to Hatfield and Milgrom (2005) introduced a general framework that incorporates such feasibility constraints into the matching problem. Al- though for the school choice application, where such feasibility constraints are not binding, the lexicographic choice rules in Kominers and Sonmez (2016) fall into our baseline model, in case of binding feasibility constraints, their lexicographic choice rules are not covered in our baseline analysis.10 In Section 3.1, we show that our baseline model and our baseline properties can be extended to a setup with feasibility constraints, highlighting the distin- guishing properties of capacity-constrained lexicographic choice rules, including the ones discussed in Kominers and Sonmez (2016), in a more general setup. Boston school district is one of the school districts that uses capacity-constrained 10For instance, the lexicographic choice rules in their setup may violate "substitutability", which is a generalization of gross substitutes to the matching with contracts setup (Hatfield and Milgrom, 2005). 5 lexicographic choice to achieve a diverse student body and implement affirmative action policies. Boston school district aims to give priority to neighborhood applicants for half of each school's seats. To achieve this goal, the Boston school district has been using a deferred acceptance mechanism based on a choice structure, where each school is endowed with a "capacity-wise lexicographic" choice rule, that is, at each capacity, the choice rule lexicographically operates based on a list containing as many priority orderings as the capacity, yet the lists for different capacity levels do not have to be related in any way.11 Dur et al. (2013) and Dur et al. (2018) analyse how the order of the priority orderings in the choice rule of a school may cause additional bias for or against the neighbourhood students.12 In Section 5, we consider a class of capacity-wise lexicographic choice rules discussed in Dur et al. (2013) that are relevant for the design of the Boston school choice system and show that our analysis enables us to single out one rule from four plausible candidates. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the related literature. In Section 3, we introduce and characterize lexicographic choice rules, show that our baseline model and our baseline properties can be extended to a setup with feasibility constraints, and also provide a characterization of responsive choice rules. In Section 4, we highlight an implication of our choice theoretical analysis for the resource allocation framework: we provide a characterization of deferred acceptance mechanisms that operate based on a lexicographic choice structure. In Section 5, we discuss some implications for the Boston school choice system. In Section 6, we conclude by discussing the main features of our analysis. 2 Related Literature Several studies investigate choice rules that satisfy path independence (Plott, 1973), which requires that if the choice set is "split up" into smaller sets, and if the choices from the smaller sets are collected and a choice is made from the collection, the final result should be the same as the choice from the original choice set. Since capacity-filling together 11See Dur et al. (2018) for a detailed discussion of Boston's school choice mechanism. 12Dur et al. (2013) is an earlier version of Dur et al. (2018). 6 with gross substitutes imply path independence,13 lexicographic choice rules are examples of path independent choice rules. Aizerman and Malishevski (1981) show that for each path independent choice rule, there exists a list of priority orderings such that the choice from each choice set is the union of the highest priority alternatives in the priority order- ings.14 Among others, Plott (1973), Moulin (1985), and Johnson and Dean (2001) study the structure of path independent choice rules. Path independent choice rules guarantee the existence of stable matchings in the matching context. Chambers and Yenmez (2017) study path independence in the matching context and its connection to stable matchings. Although the structure of path independent choice rules have been extensively studied, the structure of lexicographic choice rules and what properties distinguish them from other path independent choice rules have not been well-understood. Houy and Tadenuma (2009) consider two classes of choice rules which are both based on "lexicographic procedures", yet different than the ones we consider here. Similar to our setup, choice rules that they consider operate based on a list of binary relations.15 Yet, their model does not include capacity constraints and the lexicographic procedures that operationalize the lists are different. The only study that considers lexicographic choice rules that we study from an axiomatic perspective is Chambers and Yenmez (2018a). They show that lexicographic choice rules satisfy capacity-filling and path independence, and they also show that there are path independent choice rules that are not lexicographic, but they do not provide a characterization of lexicographic choice rules. Our analysis of the Boston school choice system is related to Dur et al. (2018) and the working paper version Dur et al. (2013). Dur et al. (2013) compare alternative choice rules for schools in the Boston school district (one of which is the one used in the Boston school district) in terms of how much they are biased for or against the neighbourhood In students. We consider these alternative choice rules from a different perspective. Section 5, we show that, although these choice rules are all based on a "lexicographic procedure" at each capacity, only one of them satisfies all the characterizing properties in 13This is also noted in Remark 1 of Dogan and Klaus (2018), and it follows from Lemma 1 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016) together with Corollary 2 of Aizerman and Malishevski (1981). 14In the words of Aizerman and Malishevski (1981), each path independent choice rule is generated by some mechanism of collected extremal choice. 15Houy and Tadenuma (2009) do not start with any assumptions on the list of binary relations. They separately discuss under which assumptions on the list of binary relations, the resulting choice rules satisfy certain properties. 7 Theorem 1, and therefore only one of them is actually a (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rule. The common feature of Dur et al. (2018) and our Section 5 is that we both consider lexicographic choice procedures in the context of school choice in Boston. The main difference is that, although the choice rules that Dur et al. (2018) consider have direct counterparts in a variable capacity context, their analysis pertains to the fixed capacity case. In particular, given a fixed school capacity, Dur et al. (2018) analyze how different lexicographic choice procedures perform. On the other hand, variable capacities, and properties related to variable capacities, are at the heart of our study. We show that, one of our variable capacity properties, CWARP, is satisfied by only one of the four choice rules discussed in Dur et al. (2013). 3 Capacity-Constrained Lexicographic Choice Let A be a nonempty finite set of n alternatives and let A denote the set of all nonempty subsets of A. A (capacity-constrained) choice problem is a pair (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n} of a choice set S and a capacity q. A (capacity-constrained) choice rule C : A×{1, . . . , n} → A associates with each problem (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}, a set of choices C(S, q) ⊆ S such that C(S, q) ≤ q. Given a choice rule C, we denote the set of rejected alternatives at a problem (S, q) by R(S, q) = S \ C(S, q). A priority ordering ≻ is a complete, transitive, and anti-symmetric binary relation over A. A priority profile π = (≻1, . . . , ≻n) is an ordered list of n priority orderings. Let Π denote the set of all priority profiles. A choice rule C is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic for a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π if for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻1-priority alternative in S, then choosing the highest ≻2-priority alternative among the remaining alternatives, and so on until q alternatives are chosen or no alter- native is left. A choice rule is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic if there exists a priority profile for which the choice rule is lexicographic. Remark 1. Note that, if a choice rule is lexicographic for a priority profile π = (≻1, . . . , ≻n), then it is lexicographic for any other priority profile that is obtained from π by replacing ≻n with an arbitrary priority ordering. In that sense, the last priority ordering is redundant. 8 We consider four properties of choice rules. The following three properties are already known in the literature. Capacity-filling: An alternative is rejected from a choice set at a capacity only if the capacity is full. Formally, for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}, C(S, q) = min{S, q}. Gross substitutes:16 If an alternative is chosen from a choice set at a capacity, then it is also chosen from any subset of the choice set that contains the alternative, at the same capacity. Formally, for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n} and each pair a, b ∈ S such that a 6= b, if a ∈ C(S, q), then a ∈ C(S\{b}, q). Monotonicity: If an alternative is chosen from a choice set at a capacity, then it is also chosen from the same choice set at any higher capacity. Formally, for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n − 1}, C(S, q) ⊆ C(S, q + 1). We now introduce a new property called the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Con- sider a problem and the set of rejected alternatives for that problem. Suppose that the capacity increases. The property requires that which alternatives among the currently rejected alternatives will be chosen (if any) should not depend on the currently accepted alternatives. In other words, if the set of rejected alternatives are the same for two choice sets (note that the set of accepted alternatives may be different), then at any higher ca- pacity, the set of initially rejected alternatives that become accepted should be the same for the two choice sets. Irrelevance of accepted alternatives: For each S, S′ ∈ A and each q ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1}, if R(S, q) = R(S′, q), then C(S, q + 1) ∩ R(S, q) = C(S′, q + 1) ∩ R(S′, q). 16Gross substitutes was first introduced in the choice literature by Chernoff (1954). It has been studied in the choice literature under different names such as Chernoff 's axiom, Sen's α, or contraction consistency. In the matching literature, it was first studied and referred to as gross substitutes in Kelso and Crawford (1982) (substitutability is also a commonly used name in the matching literature). We follow the termi- nology of Kelso and Crawford (1982). 9 We also introduce another property called capacity-wise weak axiom of revealed pref- erence which will be helpful in our analysis. Consider the following capacity-wise revealed preference relation. An alternative a ∈ A is revealed to be preferred to an alternative b ∈ A at a capacity q > 1 if there is a problem with capacity q − 1 for which a and b are both rejected and a is chosen over b when the capacity is q. That is, a is revealed to be preferred to b at q if there exists S ∈ A such that a, b /∈ C(S, q − 1), a ∈ C(S, q), and b ∈ R(S, q). Capacity-wise weak axiom of revealed preference requires, for each capacity, the revealed preference relation to be asymmetric. Capacity-wise weak axiom of revealed preference (CWARP): For each capacity q > 1 and each pair a, b ∈ A, if a is revealed to be preferred to b at q, then b is not revealed to be preferred to a at q. CWARP is a counterpart of the well-known weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP) in the standard revealed preference framework (Samuelson, 1938), where there is no capac- ity parameter. In the standard framework, an alternative is said to be revealed preferred to another alternative if there is a choice set at which the former alternative is chosen over the latter. WARP requires the revealed preference relation to be asymmetric, which in a sense requires consistency of the choice behavior in responding to changes in the choice set. In our framework, the preference is revealed not only through the choice at a choice set, but also through a change in the capacity. Therefore, what should be the counterpart of the "revealed preference relation" is not entirely clear. We propose the following definition. An alternative is revealed to be preferred to another at a capacity if there is a choice set in which the former alternative is chosen over the latter at that capacity, although if the capacity were one less, none of the alternatives would have been chosen. Put differently, if none of the two alternatives are chosen in a choice set at a given capacity, but one of them is chosen when capacity increases by one, this means the chosen alternative is revealed to be preferred to the unchosen one. CWARP requires the revealed preference relation to be asymmetric. Hence, CWARP requires consistency of the choice behavior in responding to changes in the choice set together with changes in the capacity. Additionally, one can interpret CWARP as a "no complementarities" condition, in the sense that CWARP re- quires the new alternative to be chosen due to the capacity increase be independent of the alternatives that have already been chosen. For example, if two alternatives are comple- ments, then the choice of each one of these alternatives may depend on whether the other 10 one has already been chosen or not. CWARP rules out this type of choice behavior. Remark 2. The following is an alternative definition of CWARP, which is formulated in line with the common formulations of WARP-type revealed preference relations in the literature. An alternative definition of CWARP: For each capacity q > 1, each pair S, T ∈ A and each pair a, b ∈ S ∩ T such that [C(S, q − 1) ∪ C(T, q − 1)] ∩ {a, b} = ∅, if a ∈ C(S, q) and b ∈ C(T, q) \ C(S, q), then a ∈ C(T, q). Lemma 1. If a choice rule satisfies capacity-filling, monotonicity, and CWARP, then it also satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Proof. Let C be a choice rule. Suppose that C satisfies capacity-filling and monotonicity, but violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. By violation of the irrelevance of accepted alternatives, there are S, S′ ∈ A and q ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1} such that R(S, q) = R(S′, q), but C(S, q + 1) ∩ R(S, q) 6= C(S′, q + 1) ∩ R(S′, q). By monotonicity, R(S, q + 1) ⊆ R(S, q) and R(S′, q + 1) ⊆ R(S′, q). By capacity-filling, R(S, q + 1) = R(S′, q + 1). Then, there exist a, b ∈ R(S, q) = R(S′, q) such that a ∈ C(S, q + 1), b /∈ C(S, q + 1), b ∈ C(S′, q + 1), and a /∈ C(S′, q + 1). But then, a is revealed preferred to b and vice versa, implying that C violates CWARP. In Appendix A, we show that each of the three properties capacity-filling, mono- tonicity, and CWARP is necessary for the implication in Lemma 1, that is, we provide examples of choice rules which violate exactly one of the three properties and also violate the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. The following example shows that there exists a choice rule that satisfies capacity- filling, monotonicity, and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives, but violates CWARP. Example 1. Let A = {a, b, c, d, e}. Let ≻ and ≻′ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c ≻ d ≻ e and a ≻′ c ≻′ b ≻′ d ≻′ e. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, q), if d ∈ S, then C(S, q) chooses the highest ≻-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left;17 if d /∈ S, then C(S, q) chooses the 17That is, C(S, q) coincides with the choice rule that is "responsive" for ≻. We discuss responsive choice rules in Section D. 11 highest ≻′-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left. Note that C clearly satisfies capacity-filling and monotonicity. To see that C also satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives, let S, S′ ∈ A and q ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1} be such that R(S, q) = R(S′, q). If d ∈ S ∩ S′ or d ∈ A \ (S ∪ S′), then C(S, q + 1) ∩ R(S, q) = C(S′, q + 1) ∩ R(S′, q). So suppose, without loss of generality, that d ∈ S \ S′. Since R(S, q) = R(S′, q), we have d ∈ C(S, q). But then, either R(S, q) = ∅ or R(S, q) = {e}. In either case, we have C(S, q +1)∩R(S, q) = C(S′, q +1)∩R(S′, q). To see that C violates CWARP, note that C({a, b, c, d}, 1) = {a} and C({a, b, c, d}, 2) = {a, b}, implying that b is revealed preferred to c at q = 2. Also, C({a, b, c, e}, 1) = {a} and C({a, b, c, e}, 2) = {a, c}, implying that c is revealed preferred to b at q = 2. Theorem 1. A choice rule is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic if and only if it satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonicity, and the irrelevance of accepted alterna- tives.18 Proof. Let C be lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π. Clearly, C satisfies capacity-filling and monotonicity, and it is already known from the literature that C satisfies gross substitutes (Chambers and Yenmez, 2018a). To see that it satisfies CWARP, let a, b ∈ A and q ∈ {2, . . . , n} be such that a is revealed preferred to b at q. Then, there is S ∈ A such that a, b ∈ R(S, q − 1), a ∈ C(S, q), and b ∈ R(S, q). But then, a ≻q b. If also b is revealed preferred to a at q, then by similar arguments we have b ≻q a, contradicting that ≻q is antisymmetric. Thus, the revealed preference relation is asymmetric and C satisfies CWARP. By Lemma 1, C also satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Let C be a choice rule satisfying capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonicity, and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. We first construct a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π and then show that C is lexicographic for that priority profile. For each i, j ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let aij denote the j'th ranked alternative in ≻i (for instance, ai1 is the highest ≻i-priority alternative). To construct ≻1, first set {a11} = C(A, 1). For each j ∈ {2, . . . , n}, set {a1j} = C(A\ {a11, . . . , a1(j−1)}, 1). To construct ≻2, consider C(A, 2). By capacity-filling, C(A, 2) = 2. Since a11 ∈ C(A, 1), by monotonicity, a11 ∈ C(A, 2). Set {a21} = C(A, 2) \ {a11}. For each j ∈ {2, . . . , n − 1}, set {a2j} = C(A \ {a21, a22, . . . , a2(j−1)}, 2) \ {a11}. Set a2n = a11. 18Independence of the characterizing properties is shown in Appendix B. 12 The rest of the priority profile is constructed recursively as follows. For each i ∈ {3, . . . , n}, first set {ai1} = C(A, i) \ {a11, a21, . . . , a(i−1)1} (Note that by monotonic- ity, {a11, a21, . . . , a(i−1)1} ⊆ C(A, i) and by capacity-filling, C(A, i) = i). For each j ∈ {2, . . . , n−i+1}, set {aij} = C(A\{ai1, ai2, . . . , ai(j−1)}, i)\{a11, a21, . . . , a(i−1)1}. Note that there are i − 1 rankings yet to be set in ≻i, which are {ai(n−i+2), . . . , ain}. For each j ∈ {n − i + 2, . . . , n}, set aij = a(j+i−n−1)1 (which assigns the alternatives a11, . . . , a(i−1)1 to the rankings ai(n−i+2), . . . , ain, respectively). Now, let (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}. Let b1 denote the highest ≻1-priority alternative in S, b2 denote the highest ≻2-priority alternative among the remaining alternatives, and so on up to bmin{S,q}. We show that C(S, q) = {b1, . . . , bmin{S,q}}. If min{S, q} = S, then by capacity-filling, C(S, q) = {b1, . . . , bS}. Suppose that S > q. The rest of the proof is by induction: we first show that b1 ∈ C(S, q); then, for an arbitrary i ∈ {2, . . . , q}, assuming that b1, . . . , bi−1 ∈ C(S, q), we show that bi ∈ C(S, q). Let b1 = a1j for some j ∈ {1, . . . , n}. By the construction of ≻1, b1 ∈ C(A \ {a11, . . . , a1(j−1)}, 1). Then, by gross substitutes and monotonicity, b1 ∈ C(S, q). Let i ∈ {2, . . . , q}. Assuming that b1, . . . , bi−1 ∈ C(S, q), we show that bi ∈ C(S, q). Let S′ be the choice set obtained from S by replacing b1 with a11 (note that nothing changes if b1 = a11), replacing b2 with a21, . . ., and replacing bi−1 with a(i−1)1. That is, S′ = (S \ {b1, . . . , bi−1}) ∪ {a11, . . . , a(i−1)1}. Let q′ = i − 1. Note that {b1, . . . , bi−1} = C(S, q′), because otherwise, by capacity-filling, there is a ∈ S such that a ∈ C(S, q′) and a /∈ C(S, q), which is a violation of monotonicity. Also, by the construction of the priority profile and by gross substitutes, {a11, . . . , a(i−1)1} = C(S′, q′). Note that R(S, q′) = R(S′, q′). By monotonicity and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives, we have R(S, q) = R(S′, q). Since bi ∈ C(S′, q) by the construction of the priority profile and by gross substitutes, we also have bi ∈ C(S, q). Corollary 1. A choice rule is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic if and only if it satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonicity, and CWARP. Proof. A lexicographic choice rule satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and mono- tonicity by Theorem 1. Also note that in the proof Theorem 1, we showed that a lexi- cographic choice rule satisfies CWARP as well. To see the other direction, note that by Lemma 1, capacity-filling, monotonicity, and CWARP imply the irrelevance of accepted 13 alternatives and the rest follows by Theorem 1. n), then for each pair of alternatives a, b ∈ A, if a ≻t b and b ≻′ There is never a unique priority profile for which a given choice rule is lexicographic. However, if C is lexicographic for two different priority profiles (≻1, . . . , ≻n) and (≻′ 1 , . . . , ≻′ t a for some t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, then a or b must be chosen from any choice set (particularly from A) at any capacity q < t. That is, a or b is chosen irrespective of their relative ranking at the t'th priority ordering. To state this observation formally, for each priority ordering ≻i on A and for each choice set S ∈ A, let ≻i S stand for the restriction of ≻i to S. Let A1 = A, and for each t ∈ {2, . . . , n}, let At = A \ C(A, t − 1). For each choice set S ∈ A and each priority ordering ≻i, let max(S, ≻i) be the top-ranked alternative in S according to ≻i. Proposition 1. If a choice rule C is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic for a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n), then C is lexicographic for another priority profile (≻′ n) if and only if ≻1 = ≻′ 1 and for each t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, ≻t At = ≻′ 1, . . . , ≻′ t At. 1, . . . , ≻′ n) is such that ≻1 = ≻′ Proof. (If part) Let choice rule C be lexicographic for a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n). Suppose (≻′ t At. Now, for each S ∈ A and t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, if t = 1, then since ≻1=≻′ 1, the conclusion is immediate. Then, by proceeding inductively, for each 1 < t ≤ S, since C is lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n), max(S \ C(S, t − 1), ≻t) = C(S, t) \ C(S, t − 1). Since S \ C(S, t − 1) ⊂ At and ≻t At = ≻′ t) = C(S, t) \ C(S, t − 1). It follows that C is lexicographic for (≻′ 1 and for each t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, ≻t At = ≻′ t At, we get max(S \ C(S, t − 1), ≻′ 1, . . . , ≻′ n). (Only if part) For each t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let At stand for the collection of all nonempty subsets of At with at least t elements. Then, define the choice function ct : At → At such that for each choice set S ∈ At, ct(S) = C(S, t) \ C(S, t − 1). Since C satisfies gross substitutes, ct also satisfies gross substitutes. It follows that there is a unique priority ordering ≻∗ t }. Therefore, if C is lexicographic for some (≻1, . . . , ≻n), then for each t ∈ {1, . . . , n}, ≻t At = ≻∗ t . t such that ct(S) = max{S \ C(S, t − 1), ≻∗ 14 3.1 Lexicographic Choice Under Feasibility Constraints In some applications, the choice rule of an institution is subject to a feasibility constraint. For example, a firm may encounter a choice set which includes signing the same worker under different terms, such as different salaries as modeled in Kelso and Crawford (1982), and it may not be possible to choose the same worker under several terms even when there is enough capacity (for instance, it is not possible to choose the same worker un- der different salaries). The matching with contracts model due to Hatfield and Milgrom (2005) introduced a general framework that incorporates such feasibility constraints into the matching problem, which led to several new applications of matching theory such as cadet-branch matching by Sonmez and Switzer (2013) and Sonmez (2013), and matching with slot-specific priorities by Kominers and Sonmez (2016). In this section, we will show that our baseline model and our baseline properties can be extended to a setup with fea- sibility constraints, highlighting the distinguishing properties of lexicographic choice rules in a more general setup. As in the baseline model, let A be a nonempty finite set of n alternatives and let A denote the set of all nonempty subsets of A. In addition, let F ⊆ A be a nonempty set of feasible sets. We assume that F is downward closed in the sense that for each S ∈ F and each S′ ⊆ S, S′ ∈ F .19 We also assume that each singleton is feasible, i.e. for each a ∈ A, {a} ∈ F .20 A (feasibility-constrained) choice rule C : A × {1, . . . , n} → F associates with each problem (S, q) ∈ A×{1, . . . , n}, a nonempty set of choices C(S, q) ⊆ S which is feasible, i.e. C(S, q) ∈ F , and respects the capacity constraint, i.e. C(S, q) ≤ q. Given a choice rule C, we denote the set of rejected alternatives at a problem (S, q) by R(S, q) = S \ C(S, q). Our new framework encompasses the matching with contracts framework in the fol- lowing way. Suppose that each alternative is a contract consisting of a pair: an agent and a contractual term. Suppose that a choice set is feasible if it includes, for each agent, at most one contract including that agent. It is easy to see that F is downward closed and it includes the singletons. A feasibility-constrained choice rule C is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic if 19In a matching with contracts model with distributional constraints, Goto et al. (2017) introduce the concept of a "hereditary" distributional constraint, which implies that F is downward closed. 20Note that, given downward closedness, this is equivalent to requiring that each alternative belongs to at least one feasible set. 15 there exists a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π such that for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻1-priority alternative in S, then choosing the highest ≻2-priority alternative among the remaining alternatives that induces a feasible set together with the previously chosen alternative,21 and so on as long as there is a remaining alternative until finally choosing the highest ≻q-priority alternative among the remaining alternatives that induces a feasible set together with the previously chosen alternatives. F -capacity-filling: An alternative is rejected from a choice set at a capacity only if the capacity is full or it is infeasible to choose the alternative. Formally, for each (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n} and a ∈ S, if a /∈ C(S, q), then either C(S, q) = q or C(S, q) ∪ {a} /∈ F . Let us adopt the convention that for each S ∈ A, C(S, 0) = ∅. Now, for each capacity q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, a is revealed to be F -preferred to b at q, denoted by a RF q b, if there exists S ∈ A such that a, b /∈ C(S, q − 1), and a ∈ C(S, q) but b /∈ C(S, q), although C(S, q − 1) ∪ {b} ∈ F . We introduce the following property which requires, for each capacity, the revealed preference relation be acyclic. Capacity-wise strong axiom of revealed preference (CSARP): For each capacity q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, RF q is acyclic. Proposition 2. A feasibility-constrained choice rule is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic if and only if it satisfies F -capacity-filling, monotonicity, and the capacity-wise strong ax- iom of revealed preference. Proof. (Only if part:) Let C be a feasibility-constrained choice rule that is lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n). Using similar arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1, one can easily verify that C satisfies F -capacity-filling and monotonicity. To see that C satisfies CSARP, note that for each capacity q ∈ {1, . . . , n} and a, b ∈ A, q b, then we must have a ≻q b. Since ≻q is transitive, RF is acyclic. if a RF q (If part:) Let C be a feasibility-constrained choice rule that satisfies F -capacity-filling, monotonicity, and CSARP. It follows from CSARP that for each q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, RF is q acyclic. Now, for each capacity q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, let ≻q be any completion of the transitive 21Formally, let a be the highest ≻1-priority alternative in S. Let S′ = {b ∈ S \ {a} : {a, b} ∈ F}. Then, the highest ≻2-priority alternative among the remaining alternatives that induces a feasible set together with the previously chosen alternative is max{S′, ≻2}. 16 closure of RF q . Next, we show that C is lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n). To see this, we apply induction on capacity q. Before proceeding, let us introduce some notation. For each S, T ∈ A such that T ⊂ S, let F (ST ) be the set of alternatives in S \ T that induce a feasible set together with the alternatives in T , i.e. F (ST ) = {a ∈ S \ T : T ∪ {a} ∈ F }. First, we show that for each S ∈ A, C(S, 1) = max(S, ≻1). By contradiction suppose that although a = max(S, ≻1), we have C(S, 1) = b, where a 6= b. Since C(S, 1) = b and a ∈ S, it follows that b RF 1 a, which contradicts that a = max(S, ≻1). Next, assume that for some q ∈ {2, . . . , n}, we have for each S ∈ A and q′ < q, C(S, q′) coincides with the lexicographic choice for (≻1, . . . , ≻q−1). Now, we show that for each S ∈ A, C(S, q) \ C(S, q − 1) = max(F (SC(S,q−1)), ≻q). First, let a = max(F (SC(S,q−1)), ≻q). It follows that a /∈ C(S, q − 1) and C(S, q − 1) ∪ {a} ∈ F . By contradiction, suppose that a /∈ C(S, q). Since C(S, q − 1) ∪ {a} ∈ F , it follows from F -capacity-filling that there exists x ∈ C(S, q) \ C(S, q − 1) such that x 6= a. Now, since C satisfies monotonicity, x /∈ C(S, q − 1), and since x ∈ C(S, q), C(S, q − 1) ∪ {x} ∈ F . Therefore, we have x RF q a, but this contradicts that a = max(F (SC(S,q−1)), ≻q). Thus, we conclude that C is lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n). 4 Lexicographic Deferred Acceptance Mechanisms Let N denote a finite set of agents, N = n ≥ 2. Let A be the collection of all nonempty subsets of N. Let O denote a finite set of objects. Each agent i ∈ N has a complete, transitive, and anti-symmetric preference relation Ri over O ∪ {∅}, where ∅ is the null object representing the option of receiving no object (or receiving an outside option). Given x, y ∈ O ∪ {∅}, x Ri y means that either x = y or x 6= y and agent i prefers x to y. If agent i prefers x to y, we write x Pi y. Let R denote the set of all preference relations over O ∪ {∅}, and RN the set of all preference profiles R = (Ri)i∈N such that for all i ∈ N, Ri ∈ R. An allocation problem with capacity constraints, or simply a problem, consists of a preference profile R ∈ RN and a capacity profile q = (qx)x∈O∪{∅} such that for each object x ∈ O, qx ∈ {0, 1, . . . , n} and q∅ = n so that the null object has enough capacity to accommodate all agents. Let P denote the set of all problems. Given a problem (R, q) ∈ P, 17 an object x is available at the problem if qx > 0. Given a capacity profile q = (qx)x∈O∪{∅}, an allocation assigns to each agent exactly one object in O ∪ {∅} taking capacity constraints into account. Formally, an allocation at q is a list a = (ai)i∈N such that for each i ∈ N, ai ∈ O ∪ {∅} and no object x ∈ O ∪ {∅} is assigned to more than qx agents. Let M(q) denote the set of all allocations at q. Given an allocation a = (ai)i∈N , a preference profile R, and an object x ∈ O ∪ {∅}, let Dx(a, R) = {i ∈ N : x Pi ai} denote the demand for x at (a, R), which is the set of agents who prefer x to their assigned object. A mechanism is a function ϕ : P → Sq M(q) such that for each allocation problem (R, q) ∈ P, ϕ(R, q) ∈ M(q). For mechanisms, we introduce the following property, which we call the irrelevance of satisfied demand. Consider an arbitrary problem and the allocation chosen by the mechanism at that problem. Suppose that the capacity of an object is increased. Now, some of the agents who prefer that object to their assignments at the initial allocation may receive the object due to the capacity increase. The irrelevance of satisfied demand requires that the set of agents who receive the object due to the capacity increase does not depend on the set of agents who initially receive the object. In other words, for two problems with the same capacity, if the demands for an object are the same (note that the set of agents who receive the object at those problems may be different), then whenever the capacity of the object increases, the sets of agents who receive the object due to the capacity increase should be the same for the two problems. Formally, for each x ∈ O, let 1x be the capacity profile which has 1 unit of x and nothing else. A mechanism ϕ satisfies the irrelevance of satisfied demand if for each pair of problems (R, q) and (R′, q) and each object x ∈ O, if Dx(ϕ(R, q), R) = Dx(ϕ(R′, q), R′), then Dx(ϕ(R, q + 1x), R) = Dx(ϕ(R′, q + 1x), R′). A (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice structure C = (Cx)x∈O asso- ciates each object x ∈ O with a lexicographic choice rule Cx : A × {1, . . . , n} → A. Next, we present the (capacity-constrained) lexicographic deferred acceptance algo- rithm based on C. For each problem (R, q) ∈ P, the algorithm runs as follows: Step 1: Each agent applies to his favorite object in O. Each object x ∈ O such that qx > 0 temporarily accepts the applicants in Cx(Sx, qx) where Sx is the set of agents who applied 18 to x, and rejects all the other applicants. Each object x ∈ C such that qx = 0 rejects all applicants. Step r ≥ 2: Each applicant who was rejected at step r − 1 applies to his next favorite object in O. For each object x ∈ O, let Sx,r be the set consisting of the agents who applied to x at step r and the agents who were temporarily accepted by x at Step r − 1. Each object x ∈ O such that qx > 0 accepts the applicants in Cx(Sx,r, qx) and rejects all the other applicants. Each object x ∈ O such that qx = 0 rejects all applicants. The algorithm terminates when each agent is accepted by an object. The allocation where each agent is assigned the object that he was accepted by at the end of the algorithm is called the C-lexicographic Deferred Acceptance allocation at (R, q), denoted by DAC(R, q). Lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanisms: A mechanism ϕ is a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism if there exists a lexicographic choice structure C such that for each (R, q) ∈ P, ϕ(R, q) = DAC(R, q). Ehlers and Klaus (2016), in their Theorem 3, characterize deferred acceptance mech- anisms based on a choice structure satisfying capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and mono- tonicity, with the following properties of mechanisms: unavailable-type-invariance (if the positions of the unavailable types are shuffled at a profile, then the allocation should not change); weak non-wastefulness (no agent receives the null object while he prefers an object that is not exhausted to the null object),22 resource-monotonicity (increasing the capaci- ties of some objects does not hurt any agent), truncation-invariance (if an agent truncates his preference relation in such a way that his allotment remains acceptable under the trun- cated preference relation, then the allocation should not change), and strategy-proofness (no agent can benefit by misreporting his preferences). Next, we formally introduce these properties and state Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016). Unavailable-Type-Invariance: Let (R, q) ∈ P and R′ ∈ RN . If for each i ∈ N and each pair of available objects x, y ∈ O (qx > 0, qy > 0) we have [x Ri y if and only if x R′ i y], then ϕ(R, q) = ϕ(R′, q). Weak Non-Wastefulness: For each (R, q) ∈ P, each x ∈ O such that qx > 0, and each 22The stronger version of this property, namely non-wastefulness, requires that no agent prefers an object that is not exhausted to his assigned object. Note that capacity-filling and non-wastefulness are similar in spirit, yet, capacity-filling is a property of a choice rule while non-wastefulness is a property of a mechanism. 19 i ∈ N, if x Pi ϕi(R, q) and ϕi(R, q) = ∅, then {j ∈ N : ϕj(R, q) = x} = qx. Resource-Monotonicity: For each R ∈ RN , and each pair of capacity profiles (q, q′), if for each x ∈ O, qx ≤ q′ x, then for each i ∈ N, ϕi(R, q′) Ri ϕi(R, q). Truncation-Invariance: Let (R, q) ∈ P and R′ ∈ RN . pair of objects x, y ∈ O we have [x Ri y if and only if x R′ ϕ(R, q) = ϕ(R′, q). If for each i ∈ N and each i y] and ϕi(R, q) R′ i ∅, then Strategy-proofness: For each (R, q) ∈ P, each i ∈ N, and each R′ ϕi((R′ i, R−i), q). i ∈ R, ϕi(R, q) Ri Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus(2016): A mechanism is a deferred acceptance mech- anism based on a choice structure satisfying capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and mono- tonicity if and only if it satisfies unavailable-type-invariance, weak non-wastefulness, resource- monotonicity, truncation-invariance, and strategy-proofness. The following impossibility result shows that the irrelevance of satisfied demand is too strong: there is no mechanism which satisfies it together with the above desirable properties. Proposition 3. Suppose that there are at least three objects, O ≥ 3. There is no mechanism which satisfies unavailable-type-invariance, weak non-wastefulness, resource- monotonicity, truncation-invariance, strategy-proofness, and the irrelevance of satisfied demand. Proof. Suppose that there exists such a mechanism, say ϕ, which satisfies all the properties in the statement except for the irrelevance of satisfied demand. We will show that it must violate the irrelevance of satisfied demand. By Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016), ϕ is a deferred acceptance mechanism based on a choice structure C = (Cx)x∈O which satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and monotonicity. Let i, j ∈ N be two distinct agents. We first claim that there exist two distinct objects a, b ∈ O such that i ∈ Ca({i, j}, 1) ∩ Cb({i, j}, 1) and j /∈ Ca({i, j}, 1) ∪ Cb({i, j}, 1). That is, when there is only one unit of a or b, i is chosen but j is not from {i, j}. To see this, let x, y, z ∈ O be three distinct objects. By capacity-filling, either {i} = Cx({i, j}, 1) or {j} = Cx({i, j}, 1). Without loss of generality, suppose that {i} = Cx({i, j}, 1). Again by capacity-filling, either {i} = Cy({i, j}, 1) or {j} = Cy({i, j}, 1). If {i} = Cy({i, j}, 1), then 20 we are done. Otherwise, by capacity-filling, either {i} = Cz({i, j}, 1) or {j} = Cz({i, j}, 1), and in either case, we are done. So, suppose that there exist two distinct objects a, b ∈ O such that i ∈ Ca({i, j}, 1) ∩ Cb({i, j}, 1) and j /∈ Ca({i, j}, 1) ∪ Cb({i, j}, 1). Let the preference profiles R and R′ be such that every agent other than i and j find any object unacceptable and Ri, Rj, R′ i and R′ j are as depicted below. Ri Rj b a a b ∅ ∅ 1 R′ R′ 2 a a b b ∅ ∅ Let q be such that qb = 1 and qx = 0 for any x ∈ O\{b}. Let q′ be such that q′ b = 1 and q′ x = 0 for any x ∈ O \ {a, b}. Since ϕ is a deferred acceptance mechanism based on C = (Cx)x∈O, Da(ϕ(R, q), R) = Da(ϕ(R′, q), R′) = {i, j}. However, Da(ϕ(R, q′), R) = ∅ and Da(ϕ(R′, q′), R′) = {j}, implying that ϕ violates the irrelevance of satisfied demand. a = q′ Since the irrelevance of satisfied demand is too strong, we consider the following weakening of it which requires that at any problem where there is only one available object, the set of agents who receive the object due to a capacity increase does not depend on the set of agents who initially receive the object. Formally, a mechanism ϕ satisfies the weak irrelevance of satisfied demand if for any pair of problems (R, q) and (R′, q) and each object x ∈ O such that for each y ∈ O \ {x}, qy = 0, Dx(ϕ(R, q), R) = Dx(ϕ(R′, q), R′) implies Dx(ϕ(R, q + 1x), R) = Dx(ϕ(R′, q + 1x), R′). Our next result shows that the weak irrelevance of satisfied demand together with the above properties characterize lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanisms. Proposition 4. A mechanism is a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism if and only if it satisfies unavailable-type-invariance, weak non-wastefulness, resource-monotonicity, truncation-invariance, strategy-proofness, and the weak irrelevance of satisfied demand. 21 Proof. The following notation will be helpful. For each x ∈ O, let Rx be a preference relation such that x is top-ranked and ∅ is second-ranked. For each S ∈ A that is nonempty, let Rx S)i = Rx, and for each j /∈ S, (Rx S)j top-ranks ∅. For each x ∈ O and l ∈ {0, . . . , n}, let lx denote the capacity profile where x has capacity l and every other object has capacity zero. S be a preference profile such that for each i ∈ S, (Rx Let ϕ be a mechanism satisfying the properties in the statement of the theorem. Let C = (Cx)x∈O be defined as follows. For each x ∈ O, S ∈ A, and l ∈ {0, . . . , n}, Cx(S, l) = {i ∈ S : ϕi(Rx S, lx) = x}. This choice structure is the same as the one constructed in the proof of Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016). By weak non-wastefulness, Cx satisfies capacity-filling. By resource-monotonicity, Cx satisfies monotonicity. By Lemma 2 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016), Cx satisfies gross substi- tutes. By Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016), ϕ is a deferred acceptance mechanism based on C. It is easy to see that, since ϕ satisfies the irrelevance of satisfied demand, for each x ∈ O, Cx satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Thus, C is a lexicographic choice structure and ϕ is a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism. Let ϕ be a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism. We will show that it sat- isfies irrelevance of satisfied demand. The other properties follow from Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016). Let C = (Cx)x∈O be a lexicographic choice structure such that ϕ = DAC. Let (R, q), (R′, q) ∈ P and x ∈ O be such that for each y ∈ O \ {x}, qy = 0 and let T ≡ Dx(DAC(R, q), R) = Dx(DAC(R′, q), R′). Let Cx be lexicographic for the priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π. Let S(R) and S(R′) be the sets of agents who prefer x to ∅ at R and at R′, respectively. It is easy to see that DAC(R, q) = Cx(S(R), q), DAC(R′, q) = Cx(S(R′), q), and T = S(R) \ Cx(S(R), q) = S(R′) \ Cx(S(R′), q). Let i ∈ T be the agent who is highest ranked according to ≻qx+1 in T . Clearly, DAC(R, q + 1x) = DAC(R, q) ∪ {i} and DAC(R′, q + 1x) = DAC(R′, q) ∪ {i}. Hence, Dx(DAC(R, q + 1x), R) = Dx(DAC(R′, q + 1x), R′) = T \ {i}. Remark 3. In Appendix C, we provide an example of a mechanism which satisfies all the properties in the statement of Proposition 4 except for the irrelevance of satisfied demand, and therefore which is not a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism. 22 5 Implications for School Choice in Boston In the Boston school choice system, there are two different priority orderings at each school: a walk-zone priority ordering, which gives priority to the school's neighborhood students over all the other students, and an open priority ordering which does not give priority to any student for being a neighborhood student. The Boston school district aims to assign half of the seats of each school based on the walk-zone priority ordering and the other half based on the open priority ordering. To achieve this aim, given the capacity, each school chooses students in a lexicographic way according to a priority profile where half of the priority orderings is the walk-zone priority ordering and the other half is the open priority ordering. In a recent study, Dur et al. (2013) note that two priority profiles with the same num- bers of walk-zone and open priority orderings, but with different precedence orders of the priority orderings, may result in different choices under a lexicographic choice procedure. Starting with this observation, Dur et al. (2013) compare four different choice rules, one of which is the one used in the Boston school district, in terms of how much they are biased for or against the neighbourhood students. In this section, we will consider these alternative choice rules from a different perspective. We will show that, although these choice rules are all based on a "lexicographic procedure" at each capacity, only one of them satisfies all the characterizing properties in Theorem 1, and therefore only one of them is actually a (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rule. In order to put the four choice rules in a formal context, let us consider the following class of choice rules which is larger than the class of lexicographic choice rules. We say that a choice rule is capacity-wise lexicographic if there exists a list of priority orderings for each capacity level (the number of priority orderings is the same as the capacity), and at each capacity, the rule operates based on the associated list of priority orderings in a lexicographic way. For a capacity-wise lexicographic choice rule, unlike a lexicographic choice rule, the lists for different capacity levels are not necessarily related. The capacity-wise lexicographic choice rules that can serve the Boston school district's purpose are the choice rules for which, at each capacity, the associated list consists of only the walk-zone priority ordering and the open priority ordering, and the absolute difference between the numbers of walk-zone and open priority orderings in the list is at most one. 23 We formalize this property as follows. Let ≻w and ≻o be walk-zone and open priority orderings. We say that a capacity- wise lexicographic choice rule satisfies the Boston requirement for (≻w,≻o) if for each capacity q, the associated list of priority orderings (≻1, . . . , ≻q) is such that i. for each l ∈ {1, . . . , q}, ≻l∈ {≻w, ≻o}, ii. difference between the number of ≻w-priorities and ≻o-priorities is at most one, i.e. Pq i=1 1≻w(≻i) − Pq i=1 1≻o(≻i)(cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) Now, it turns out that the following class of capacity-wise lexicographic choice rules are the only rules satisfying our set of properties together with the Boston requirement for (≻w,≻o). ≤ 1.23 Proposition 5. A capacity-wise lexicographic choice rule satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonicity, the capacity-wise weak axiom of revealed preference, and the Boston requirement for (≻w,≻o) if and only if it is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic for a priority profile (≻1, . . . , ≻n) such that i. for each l ∈ {1, . . . , n}, ≻l∈ {≻w, ≻o}, ii. for each l that is odd, ≻l=≻w if and only if ≻l+1=≻o. Proof. By Theorem 1, a choice rule satisfying the properties must be lexicographic. The rest is straightforward. Some examples of priority profiles satisfying (i) and (ii) in the statement of Proposition 5 are (≻w, ≻o, ≻w, ≻o, . . .), (≻o, ≻w, ≻o, ≻w, . . .), and (≻w, ≻o, ≻o, ≻w, ≻w, ≻o, ≻w, ≻o, . . .). Some examples that violate (ii) are (≻w, ≻o, ≻o, ≻w, ≻o, ≻o, . . .) and (≻o, ≻w, ≻w, ≻o, ≻w , ≻w, . . .). Four plausible choice rules stand out from the analysis of Dur et al. (2013), one of which is currently in use in Boston (Open-Walk choice rule). Dur et al. (2013) compare the below four choice rules in terms of how much they are biased for or against the neighbourhood students. We will compare the four choice rules with respect to our set of choice rule properties. 231x(y) is the indicator function which has the value 1 if x = y and 0 otherwise. 24 1. Walk-Open Choice Rule: At each capacity, the first half of the priority orderings in the list are the walk-zone priority ordering and the last half are the open priority ordering. 2. Open-Walk Choice Rule: At each capacity, the first half of the priority orderings in the list are the open priority ordering and the last half are the walk-zone priority ordering. 3. Rotating Choice Rule: At each capacity, the first priority ordering in the list is the walk-zone priority ordering, the second is the open priority ordering, the third is the walk-zone priority ordering, and so on. 4. Compromise Choice Rule: At each capacity, the first quarter of the priority orderings in the list are the walk-zone priority ordering, the following half of the priority orderings in the list are the open priority ordering, and the last quarter are again the walk-zone priority ordering. To be precise, let us introduce the following procedures to accommodate the cases where the capacity is not divisible by two or four. • Walk-Open Choice Rule: If the capacity q is an odd number, the first q+1 2 are the walk-zone priority ordering. • Open-Walk Choice Rule: If the capacity q is an odd number, the first q+1 2 are the open priority ordering. • Compromise Choice Rule: If the capacity q is not divisible by four, let q = q′ + k 4 + 1 2 orderings be the open 4 orderings be the walk-zone priority ordering. If 4 + 1 orderings be the walk-zone priority ordering, the following 4 orderings be the walk- 4 +1 orderings be the walk-zone priority 2 + 1 orderings be the open priority ordering, and the last for some q′ that is divisible by 4 and some k ∈ {1, 2, 3}. If k = 1, let the first q′ orderings be the walk-zone priority ordering, the following q′ priority ordering, and the last q′ k = 2, let the first q′ q′ 2 + 1 orderings be the open priority ordering, and the last q′ zone priority ordering. If k = 3, let the first q′ ordering, the following q′ q′ 4 + 1 orderings be the walk-zone priority ordering. Note that all of the above rules satisfy the Boston requirement for (≻w,≻o). Since all of the rules are capacity-wise lexicographic, they satisfy capacity-filling and gross sub- stitutes. It follows from the only if part of Proposition 5 that, among these four choice rules, only the Rotating Choice Rule satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, monotonic- 25 ity, and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. However, it is not clear if the other three rules are not lexicographic under variable capacity constraints because they fail to satisfy monotonicity, the irrelevance of accepted alternatives or both. Next, we show that the other three rules satisfy monotonicity, but they violate the irrelevance of accepted alterna- tives. To show that these rules satisfy monotonicity, we first provide an auxiliary condition that is easier to verify and sufficient for monotonicity. Next we introduce this condition and prove that it is sufficient for monotonicity. Let π = (≻1, . . . , ≻q) and π′ = (≻′ q+1) be priority lists of size q and q + 1, respectively. We say that π′ is obtained by insertion from π if there exists k ∈ {1, . . . , q+ 1} such that ≻′ l=≻l−1 for each l > k. Note that when π′ is obtained by insertion from π, a new priority ordering is inserted into the list of priority l=≻l for each l < k, and ≻′ 1, . . . , ≻′ orderings in π, by keeping relative order of the other priority orderings in the list the same. It is possible that the new ordering is inserted in the very beginning or in the very end of the list. Lemma 2. Let C be a capacity-wise lexicographic choice rule. The choice rule C is monotonic if for each q ∈ {2, . . . , n}, the priority list for q is obtained by insertion from the priority list for q − 1. Proof. Let (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n − 1}. Let π = (≻1, . . . , ≻q) be the list for capacity q. Let a ∈ C(S, q). Suppose that, in the lexicographic choice procedure, a is chosen at the t'th step, i.e. a is chosen based on ≻t. Let π′ = (≻′ 1, . . . , ≻′ from π. Let k ∈ {1, . . . , q + 1} be such that ≻′ l > k. q+1) be the list for capacity q + 1 that is obtained by an insertion l=≻l−1 for each l=≻l for each l < k, and ≻′ Now, consider the problem (S, q + 1). If t < k, clearly a is still chosen at the t'th step of the lexicographic choice procedure and thus a ∈ C(S, q + 1). Suppose that t ≥ k. The rest of the proof is by induction. First, suppose that t = k. Note that at Step k of the choice procedure for the problem (S, q + 1), the choice is made based on the inserted priority ordering and at Step k + 1, the choice is made based on ≻t. Then, a is either chosen at Step k, or at Step k + 1, the set of remaining alternatives is a subset of the set of remaining alternatives at Step t of the choice procedure for (S, q) where a is chosen, in which case a is still chosen. Thus, a ∈ C(S, q + 1). 26 Now, suppose that t > k and each alternative that is chosen at a step t′ < t of the choice procedure at (S, q) is also chosen at (S, q + 1). Then, a is either chosen before step t+1 of the choice procedure for (S, q +1), or at Step t+1, the set of remaining alternatives is a subset of the set of remaining alternatives at Step t of the choice procedure for (S, q) where a is chosen, in which case a is still chosen. Thus, a ∈ C(S, q + 1). Proposition 6. All of the four rules satisfy capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and mono- tonicity, but only the rotating choice rule satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives and only the rotating choice rule is (capacity-constrained) lexicographic. Proof. Each rule is capacity-wise lexicographic (lexicographic for a given capacity) and therefore satisfies capacity-filling and gross substitutes. Moreover, it is easy to see that each of the four choice rules satisfies the insertion property, so monotonicity follows from Lemma 2. As for the irrelevance of accepted alternatives, first consider (≻1, . . . , ≻n) ∈ Π such that the first priority ordering in the list is ≻w, the second is ≻o, the third is ≻w, and so on. The rotating choice rule is clearly lexicographic for (≻1, . . . , ≻n). Moreover, by Theorem 1, it satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. We will show that each of the other three choice rules violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Walk-Open Choice Rule: Let A = {a, b, c, d, e}. Let ≻w be defined as a ≻w b ≻w c ≻w d ≻w e and ≻o be defined as e ≻o b ≻o d ≻o c ≻o a. Note that R({a, c, d, e}, 2) = R({a, b, c, d}, 2) = {c, d}. However, R({a, c, d, e}, 3) = {d} and R({a, b, c, d}, 3) = {c}, and therefore C violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Open-Walk Choice Rule: Can be shown by interchanging the orderings for ≻w and ≻o in the previous example. Compromise Choice Rule: Let A = {a, b, c, d, x, y}. Let ≻w be defined as a ≻w b ≻w c ≻w d ≻w x ≻w y and ≻o be defined as b ≻o c ≻o y ≻o x ≻o d. Note that R({a, b, c, x, y}, 3) = R({a, b, d, x, y}, 3) = {x, y}. However, R({a, b, c, x, y}, 4) = {y} and R({a, b, d, x, y}, 4) = {x}, and therefore C violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Remark 4. Note that the particular procedures we introduced to accommodate the cases where the capacity is not divisible by two or four are not crucial for the proof of Propo- sition 6. For the other procedures (for example, for the walk-open choice rule, the extra 27 priority when the capacity is odd can alternatively be set to be the open priority ordering), the examples in the proof can simply be modified to show that the irrelevance of accepted alternatives is still violated. It follows from our Proposition 6 that if the irrelevance of accepted alternatives or having a lexicographic representation under variable capacity constraints is deemed de- sirable, then the rotating choice rule should be selected since it is the only choice rule among the four plausible choice rules that satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives together with capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and monotonicity. Another interpretation of our Proposition 6 is the following. First of all, note that in Dur et al. (2013), the capacity is fixed and a choice rule is defined given a capacity. On the other hand, the capacity is allowed to vary and a choice rule has to specify which alternatives are chosen from each choice set at each possible capacity in our approach, which is the fundamental difference between Dur et al. (2013) and our study. The fact that we allow the capacity to vary and we require a choice rule to respond to changes in the capacity, allows us to define desirable properties of choice rules that address how it should respond to changes in the capacity, such as monotonicity and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Proposition 6 shows that, although each of the four rules in Dur et al. (2013) operate based on a lexicographic procedure when we fix the capacity, in a variable capacity framework only one of them satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives and therefore only one of them is capacity-constrained lexicographic under variable capacities, i.e., there exists a priority profile, which has as many priority orderings as the maximum possible capacity, such that at each capacity, the rule operates based on a lexicographic procedure with respect to the same priority profile. 6 Conclusion Our formulation of a choice rule and the properties that we consider take into account that the capacity may vary. When designing choice rules especially for resource allocation purposes, such as in school choice, a designer may be interested in choice rules that respond In that framework, our Theorem 1 shows that capacity-filling, to changes in capacity. gross substitutes, monotonicity, and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives are altogether 28 satisfied only by (capacity-constrained) lexicographic choice rules, which identifies the properties that distinguish lexicographic choice rules from other plausible choice rules. Besides providing an axiomatic foundation for lexicographic choice rules, this finding may be helpful in applications to select among plausible choice rules, as we have illustrated in Section 5, and also to understand characterizing properties of popular resource allocation mechanisms, as we have illustrated in Section 4. References Abdulkadiroglu, A. and T. Sonmez (2003). School choice: A mechanism design approach. American Economic Review 93, 729 -- 747. Aizerman, M. A. and A. V. Malishevski (1981). General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects, automatic control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26, 1030 -- 1040. Chambers, C. P. and M. B. Yenmez (2017). Choice and matching. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 9, 126 -- 147. Chambers, C. P. and M. B. Yenmez (2018a). On lexicographic choice. Economics Let- ters 171, 222 -- 224. Chambers, C. P. and M. B. Yenmez (2018b). A simple characterization of responsive choice. Games and Economic Behavior 111, 217 -- 221. Chernoff, H. (1954). Rational selection of decision functions. Econometrica. Dogan, B. and B. Klaus (2018). Resource allocation via immediate acceptance: Character- izations and an affirmative action application. Journal of Mathematical Economics 79, 140 -- 156. Dogan, B. and M. B. Yenmez (2019). Unified versus divided enrollment in school choice: improving student welfare in chicago. Working Paper . Dur, U., S. D. Kominers, P. A. Pathak, and T. Sonmez (2013). Reserve design: Unin- tended consequences and the demise of boston's walk zones. Working paper, available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w18981 . 29 Dur, U., S. D. Kominers, P. A. Pathak, and T. Sonmez (2018). Reserve design: Unintended consequences and the demise of boston's walk zones. Journal of Political Economy 126, 2457 -- 2479. Echenique, F. and M. B. Yenmez (2015). How to control controlled school choice. American Economic Review 105, 2679 -- 2694. Ehlers, L., I. Hafalir, and M. Yildirim (2014). School choice with controlled choice con- straints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds. Journal of Economic Theory 153, 648 -- 683. Ehlers, L. and B. Klaus (2014). Strategy-proofness makes the difference: Deferred- acceptance with responsive priorities. Mathematics of Operations Research 39, 949 -- 966. Ehlers, L. and B. Klaus (2016). Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy- proofness and comparative statics. Games and Economic Behavior 97, 128 -- 146. Ehlers, L. and Y. Sprumont (2008). Weakened warp and top-cycle choice rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44, 87 -- 94. Goto, M., F. Kojima, R. Kurata, a. Tamura, and M. Yokoo (2017). Designing match- ing mechanisms under general distributional constraints. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 9 (2), 226 -- 262. Hatfield, J. W. and P. Milgrom (2005). Matching with contracts. American Economic Review 95, 913 -- 935. Houy, N. and K. Tadenuma (2009). Lexicographic compositions of multiple criteria for decision making. Journal of Economic Theory 144, 1770 -- 1782. Jamison, D. T. and L. J. Lau (1973). Semiorders and the theory of choice. Economet- rica 41 (5), 901 -- 912. Johnson, M. R. and R. A. Dean (2001). Locally complete path independent choice func- tions and their lattices. Mathematical Social Sciences 42, 53 -- 87. Kelso, A. S. and V. P. Crawford (1982). Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50, 1483 -- 1504. 30 Kojima, F. and M. Manea (2010). Axioms for deferred acceptance. Econometrica 78, 633 -- 653. Kominers, S. D. and T. Sonmez (2016). Matching with slot-specific priorities: Theory. Theoretical Economics 11, 683 -- 710. Moulin, H. (1985). Choice functions over a finite set. Social Choice and Welfare 2, 147 -- 160. Plott, C. R. (1973). Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica 41, 1075 -- 1091. Roth, A. and M. Sotomayor (1990). Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer's behavior. Economica 5, 61 -- 71. Sonmez, T. (2013). Bidding for army career specialties: Improving the rotc branching mechanism. Journal of Political Economy 121 (1), 186 -- 219. Sonmez, T. and T. B. Switzer (2013). Matching with (branch-of-choice) contracts at the united states military academy. Econometrica 81 (2), 451 -- 488. Appendix A Necessity of the Properties in Lemma 1 The following example shows that capacity-filling is necessary for the implication, that is, there exists a choice rule which satisfies monotonicity and CWARP, but not the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Example 2. Let A = {a, b, c}. Let ≻ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, q), if a ∈ S, then C(S, q) = {a}; if a /∈ S, then C chooses the highest ≻-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left. Note that C clearly violates capacity-filling and satisfies monotonicity 31 and CWARP. Now, let S = {a, c} and S′ = {b, c}. Note that R(S, 1) = R(S′, 1) = {c}, C(S, 2)∩R(S, 1) = ∅, C(S′, 2)∩R(S′, 1) = {c}, and therefore C(S, 2)∩R(S, 1) 6= C(S′, 2)∩ R(S′, 1), implying that C violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. The following example shows that monotonicity is necessary for the implication, that is, there exists a choice rule which satisfies capacity-filling and CWARP, but not the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Example 3. Let A = {a, b, c, d}. Let ≻ and ≻′ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c ≻ d and b ≻′ c ≻′ d ≻′ a. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, 1), C chooses the highest ≻-priority alternatives from S; and for each problem (S, q) such that q > 1, C chooses the highest ≻′-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left. Note that C clearly satisfies capacity-filling and CWARP. C violates monotonicity because, for instance, a ∈ C({a, b, c}, 1) but a /∈ C({a, b, c}, 2). Now, let S = {a, c, d} and S′ = {b, c, d}. Note that R(S, 1) = R(S′, 1) = {c, d}, C(S, 2) ∩ R(S, 1) = {c, d}, C(S′, 2) ∩ R(S′, 1) = {c}, and therefore C(S, 2) ∩ R(S, 1) 6= C(S′, 2) ∩ R(S′, 1), implying that C violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. The following example shows that CWARP is necessary for the implication, that is, there exists a choice rule which satisfies capacity-filling and monotonicity, but not the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Example 4. Let A = {a, b, c, d}. Let ≻ and ≻′ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c ≻ d and a ≻′ b ≻′ d ≻′ c. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, q) such that a ∈ S, C chooses the highest ≻-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left; and for each problem (S, q) such that a /∈ S, C chooses the highest ≻′-priority alternatives from S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left. Note that C clearly satisfies capacity-filling and monotonicity. Now, let S = {a, c, d} and S′ = {b, c, d}. Note that R(S, 1) = R(S′, 1) = {c, d}, C(S, 2) ∩ R(S, 1) = {c}, C(S′, 2) ∩ R(S′, 1) = {d}, and therefore C(S, 2) ∩ R(S, 1) 6= C(S′, 2) ∩ R(S′, 1), implying that C violates the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. 32 B Independence of Properties in Theorem 1 Violating only capacity-filling: Let A = {a, b, c}. Let ≻ be a priority ordering. Let C be the choice rule such that, for each problem (S, q), C(S, q) is a singleton consisting of the ≻-maximal alternative in S. Note that C violates capacity-filling and clearly satisfies gross substitutes. Since the choice does not vary with capacity, C also satisfies monotonicity and the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Violating only gross substitutes: Let A = {a, b, c}. Let ≻ and ≻′ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c and b ≻′ a ≻′ c. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, q), C(S, q) consists of the ≻-maximal alternative in S if q = 1 and c ∈ S; otherwise, C(S, q) coincides with the choice rule that is responsive for ≻′. Note that C satisfies capacity-filling. Since a ∈ C({a, b, c}, 1) = {a} and a /∈ C({a, b}, 1) = {b}, C violates gross substitutes. To see that C satisfies monotonicity, suppose that there exists a set S and an alternative x ∈ S such that x ∈ C(S, 1) and x /∈ C(S, 2). Note that x /∈ C(S, 2) implies that x = c and S = {a, b, c}. But then, x /∈ C(S, 1) = {a}, a contradiction. To see that C satisfies CWARP, note that the revealed preference relation at q = 2 consists of a unique pair: b is revealed preferred to c. Then, by Lemma 1, C also satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Violating only monotonicity: Let A = {a, b, c}. Let ≻ be defined as a ≻ b ≻ c. Let the choice rule C be defined as follows. For each problem (S, q), C(S, q) consists of the ≻-maximal alternative in S if q = 1; C(S, 2) = S if S = 2; and C({a, b, c}, 2) = {b, c}. Note that C satisfies capacity-filling. Since a ∈ C({a, b, c}, 1) and a /∈ C({a, b, c}, 2), C violates monotonicity. For q = 1, C satisfies gross substitutes, since C maximizes ≻; for q ∈ {2, 3}, C clearly satisfies gross substitutes. Since there are no two different problems with the same capacity and the same set of rejected alternatives, C satisfies the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. Violating only CWARP: Note that three of the four rules that we discuss in Section 5 satisfy all the properties but the irrelevance of accepted alternatives. 33 C Importance of the Irrelevance of Satisfied Demand in Proposition 4 We provide an example of a mechanism which satisfies all the properties in the statement of Proposition 4 except for the irrelevance of satisfied demand, and therefore which is not a lexicographic deferred acceptance mechanism. The mechanism in the example is a deferred acceptance mechanism based on a choice structure such that the choice rule of each object is a walk-open choice rule. The example uses some arguments from the proof of Proposition 6, where it was shown that the walk-open choice rule violates CWARP. Example 5. Let N = {a, b, c, d, e} and let O be a finite set of objects. Let ≻w be defined as a ≻w b ≻w c ≻w d ≻w e and ≻o be defined as e ≻o b ≻o d ≻o c ≻o a. Let (Cx)x∈O be the choice structure such that for each object x ∈ O, Cx is the walk-open choice rule based on (≻w, ≻o). Let ϕ be the deferred acceptance mechanism based on the choice structure (Cx)x∈O. Since for each x ∈ O, Cx satisfies capacity-filling, gross substitutes, and monotonicity, by Theorem 3 of Ehlers and Klaus (2016), ϕ satisfies unavailable-type-invariance, weak non-wastefulness, resource-monotonicity, truncation-invariance, and strategy-proofness. Let x ∈ O. Let q be such that qx = 2 and for each y ∈ O \ {x}, qy = 0. Let R be such that x is preferred to ∅ for all the agents except for b. Note that Dx(ϕ(R, q), R) = {c, d} since Cx({a, c, d, e}, 2) = {a, e}. Let R′ be such that x is preferred to ∅ for all the agents except for e. Note that Dx(ϕ(R′, q), R′) = {c, d} since Cx({a, b, c, d}, 2) = {a, b}. Thus, Dx(ϕ(R, q), R) = Dx(ϕ(R′, q), R′). Now, we have Dx(ϕ(R, q + 1x), R) = {d} since Cx({a, c, d, e, 3}) = {a, c, e} and Dx(ϕ(R′, q + 1x), R′) = {c} since Cx({a, b, c, d, 3}) = {a, b, d}. (Note that when q = 3, Cx is lexicographic for (≻w, ≻w, ≻o).) Hence, ϕ violates the irrelevance of satisfied demand. 34 D Responsive Choice A well-known example of a lexicographic choice rule is a "responsive" choice rule,24 which is lexicographic for a priority profile where all the priority orderings are the same. Formally, a choice rule C is responsive for a priority ordering ≻ if for each (S, q) ∈ A×{1, . . . , n}, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻-priority alternatives in S until q alternatives are chosen or no alternative is left. Note that C is responsive for ≻ if and only if it is lexicographic for the priority profile (≻, . . . , ≻). Chambers and Yenmez (2018b) characterize "responsive" choice rules, but in the con- text of "classical" choice problems which do not explicitly refer to a variable capacity parameter. Formally, a classical choice rule is a function C : A → A such that for each S ∈ A, C(S) ⊆ S. A classical choice rule is responsive if there exists a priority ordering ≻ and a capacity q ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that for each S ∈ A, C(S) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻-priority alternatives until the capacity q is reached or no alternative is left. Chambers and Yenmez (2018b) show that a classical choice rule satisfies capacity-filling 25 and the weaker axiom of revealed preference (WrARP) if and only if it is responsive.26 WrARP 27 requires that for each pair a, b ∈ A and S, S′ ∈ A such that a, b ∈ S ∩ S′ , if a ∈ C(S) and b ∈ C(S′) \ C(S), then a ∈ C(S′). To see what Chambers and Yenmez (2018b) implies in our variable capacity setup, consider the following extension of WrARP to our setup. Weaker axiom of revealed preference (WrARP): For each S, S′ ∈ A, q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, and each pair a, b ∈ S ∩ S′, if a ∈ C(S, q) and b ∈ C(S′, q) \ C(S, q), then a ∈ C(S′, q). 24Responsive choice rules have been studied particularly in the two-sided matching context (Roth and Sotomayor, 1990). 25A classical choice rule satisfies capacity-filling if there exists a capacity such that at each choice problem, an alternative is rejected only if the capacity is reached. 26Chambers and Yenmez (2018b) also provide a characterization of choice rules that are responsive for a known capacity (namely q-responsive choice rules). 27WrARP was introduced by Jamison and Lau (1973) and also studied by Ehlers and Sprumont (2008). 35 The following Proposition 7 directly follows from Chambers and Yenmez (2018b). Proposition 7. A choice rule satisfies capacity-filling and the weaker axiom of revealed preference if and only if for each q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, there is a priority ordering ≻q such that for each S ∈ A, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻q-priority alternatives until the capacity q is reached or no alternative is left. Proposition 7 states that capacity-filling andWrARP characterizes "capacity-wise responsive" choice rules, which are responsive for each capacity, but the associated priority orderings for different capacities may be different. Yet, a characterization of responsive choice rules in our setup does not directly follow from Chambers and Yenmez (2018b). We show that, the following extension of WrARP, together with capacity-filling, char- acterizes responsive choice rules in our variable-capacity setup. The property, called the capacity-wise weaker axiom of revealed preference (CWrARP), requires that if an alterna- tive a is chosen and b is not chosen at a problem where they are both available, then at any problem where they are both available, a is chosen whenever b is chosen. Capacity-wise weaker axiom of revealed preference (CWrARP): For each S, S′ ∈ A, q, q′ ∈ {1, . . . , n}, and each pair a, b ∈ S ∩ S′ , if a ∈ C(S, q) and b ∈ C(S′, q′) \ C(S, q), then a ∈ C(S′, q′). Theorem 2. A choice rule is responsive if and only if it satisfies capacity-filling and the capacity-wise weaker axiom of revealed preference. Proof. It is clear that a responsive choice rule satisfies capacity-filling and CWrARP. Let C be a choice rule satisfying capacity-filling and CWrARP. Clearly, CWrARP implies WrARP, and therefore by Proposition 7, for each q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, there is a priority ordering ≻q such that for each S ∈ A, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻q-priority alternatives until the capacity q is reached or no alternative is left. Let (S, q) ∈ A × {1, . . . , n}. If S ≤ q, then by capacity-filling, C(S, q) = S. Suppose that S > q. First note that C(S, q − 1) ⊆ C(S, q), since otherwise, by capacity-filling, there is a pair a, b ∈ S such that a ∈ C(S, q−1)\C(S, q) and b ∈ C(S, q)\C(S, q−1), which contradicts CWrARP. Now, consider any pair a, b ∈ R(S, q − 1) such that a ∈ C(S, q) and 36 b /∈ C(S, q). By CWrARP, for any S′ ∈ A, b is not chosen over a at (S′, q), implying that a has ≻q-priority over b. But then, for each S ∈ A, C(S, q) is obtained by choosing the highest ≻q−1-priority alternatives until the capacity q is reached or no alternative is left. Since we started with an arbitrary q ∈ {1, . . . , n}, C is a choice rule that is responsive to ≻1. 37
1906.09353	1	1906	2019-06-21T23:42:46	Suboptimal Provision of Privacy and Statistical Accuracy When They are Public Goods	[ "econ.TH", "cs.CR", "cs.DB" ]	With vast databases at their disposal, private tech companies can compete with public statistical agencies to provide population statistics. However, private companies face different incentives to provide high-quality statistics and to protect the privacy of the people whose data are used. When both privacy protection and statistical accuracy are public goods, private providers tend to produce at least one suboptimally, but it is not clear which. We model a firm that publishes statistics under a guarantee of differential privacy. We prove that provision by the private firm results in inefficiently low data quality in this framework.	econ.TH	econ	Suboptimal Provision of Privacy and Statistical Accuracy When They are Public Goods John M. Abowd, Ian M. Schmutte, William Sexton, Lars Vilhuber June 25, 2019 Abstract With vast databases at their disposal, private tech companies can compete with public statistical agencies to provide population statistics. However, pri- vate companies face different incentives to provide high-quality statistics and to protect the privacy of the people whose data are used. When both privacy protection and statistical accuracy are public goods, private providers tend to produce at least one suboptimally, but it is not clear which. We model a firm that publishes statistics under a guarantee of differential privacy. We prove that provision by the private firm results in inefficiently low data quality in this framework. Keywords: Demand for public statistics; Technology for statistical agencies; Opti- mal data accuracy; Optimal confidentiality protection Abowd: U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Economics, Cornell University. Schmutte: University of Georgia and U.S. Census Bureau. Sexton: U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Economics, Cornell University. Vilhuber: Department of Economics, Cornell University and U.S. Census Bureau. We acknowledge the support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant G-2015- 13903 and NSF Grant SES-1131848. Abowd and Vilhuber acknowledge direct support from NSF Grants BCS-0941226 and TC-1012593. We are grateful for helpful comments from Larry Blume, David Card, Michael Castro, Cynthia Dwork, John Eltinge, Stephen Fienberg, Mark Kutzbach, Ron Jarmin, Dan Kifer, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Frank McSherry, Gerome Miklau, Kobbi Nissim, Mallesh Pai, Jerry Reiter, Eric Slud, Adam Smith, Bruce Spencer, Sara Sullivan, Glen Weyl, and Nellie Zhao. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau, NSF, or the Sloan Foundation. No confidential data were used in this paper. Traditionally, statistical agencies have been charged with publishing summaries of data collected from the nation's citizens and businesses. Their data collection activities are expensive, and at risk of losing funding, despite an increasing de- mand for reliable data.1 In this environment, one option is to augment, or replace, public statistical programs with information collected by private companies. In- deed, companies that aggregate personal data -- e.g. Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Uber, Upwork -- are under pressure to use their vast databases in the public interest. They are, often in collaboration with academic researchers, de- veloping innovative data products like Google Trends (Choi and Varian 2012), the Billion Prices Project (Cavallo and Rigobon 2016), and the University of Michigan Social Media Job Loss Index (Antenucci et al. 2014). Clearly, the private sector is capable of producing innovative data products and could provide them competi- tively to the public. Why are population statistics provided by public statistical agencies rather than private firms? There are a number of potential difficulties, but in this paper we focus on inefficiencies in how private providers trade off data privacy and ac- curacy. Following the fundamental law of information recovery (Dinur and Nissim 2003), increasing the accuracy of published statistical summaries necessarily re- sults in a loss of privacy for the data owners. This means statistical agencies must perform a balancing act. Published statistics should be as accurate as possible without revealing too much information about any single individual or business. When the benefits of more accurate population statistics and privacy losses are shared by all citizens, we show that private provision will result in inefficiently low levels of data accuracy and inefficiently high levels of privacy protection. To establish suboptimality of the private provision of population statistics, we 1For evidence of increasing demand for Census data, see the discussion in Ruggles et al. (2019). 1 model the problem faced by a private data custodian who wants to sell population statistics. Our model extends Ghosh and Roth (2015, GR hereafter), who consider the problem of a data custodian, or producer, with legal possession of confiden- tial data that was originally provided by data owners. The custodian wants to sell population statistics based on the confidential data to data users, who need the statistical summaries sold by the custodian to improve decision-making. We formalize the tradeoff between privacy and accuracy by assuming the custodian publishes using a differentially private mechanism. Operating this mechanism to publish statistics with a given level of accuracy requires the data owners to in- cur a known and quantifiable loss of privacy. Ghosh and Roth (2015) establish a minimum-cost method for purchasing privacy-loss rights from the data owners. Unlike Ghosh and Roth, who treat the demand for accuracy as exogenous, we assume an endogenous demand for data accuracy, and focus on its implications for the efficiency of private provision. The producer therefore balances the de- mand for statistical accuracy against a demand for privacy protection. We model consumers who have heterogeneous preferences for the accuracy of the published statistical summaries, as well as for privacy protection. This formulation nests the more intuitive case in which the users of data are distinct from the population on whom data are collected. Our model of data publication is based on differential privacy (Dwork 2006; Dwork et al. 2006; 2017), which has been adopted by tech companies like Google and Apple, as well as by the U.S. Census Bureau.2 Differential privacy is an ap- proach to publishing statistical summaries from confidential data sources that al- lows the publisher to make explicit, mathematically rigorous, statements about 2See, for example, and Abowd and Schmutte (2019) regarding applications of differential privacy at Google, Apple, and Census respectively. (2014), Differential Privacy Team (2017), Erlingsson et al. 2 how much privacy -- measured as a quantity -- is lost with each publication. Fur- thermore, differentially private publications can induce an explicit positive rela- tionship between accuracy of the published data and the amount of privacy loss.3 Crucially, we model both privacy protection and accuracy as public goods. Thus, it is not a priori obvious whether the private provider will provide too much or too little privacy protection. Data accuracy is a public good, since any con- sumer may access and use the published data without reducing its accuracy for some other consumer (it is non-rival) and no consumer can block another con- sumer's use (it is non-excludable). In plain English, all persons can learn and benefit from the use of high-quality data by others, and they can also access those data directly themselves. They value what they learn. And they understand that what they learn is more useful if it is more accurate. Privacy protection is also a public good because all individuals in the database benefit from the same level of privacy protection embodied in the producer's data publication process, an im- plication of the Ghosh-Roth mechanism (non-rivalry in consumption for privacy protection). We find that private provision results in suboptimally low data accuracy. As in Samuelson's classic model (Samuelson 1954), the external benefit of data accu- racy to all consumers is not captured by the willingness-to-pay of the consumer with the greatest private value. By contrast, the demand for privacy protection is derived from the data provider's cost-minimization problem. The provider buys just enough data-use rights (privacy loss) to sell the data accuracy to the consumer with the highest valuation. All other consumers use the published data for free.4 3For a non-technical see Wood et al. (2018) See Heffetz and Ligett (2014) for an introduction targeted toward economists. For a more compre- hensive treatment, see Dwork and Roth (2014). introduction to differential privacy, 4Study of this case may be of special interest for some business-data collection for industries with a small number of dominant organizations. 3 While the suboptimality of private provision of public goods is well-understood (Spence 1975), modeling the origin and nature of suboptimality in the market for population statistics is not. Given the adoption of differential privacy by the U.S. Census Bureau, and the increasing demand for public data products from tech companies, it is important to consider how markets might, and might not, appropriately balance society's interests in privacy protection and data quality (Abowd and Schmutte 2019). Our paper is also broadly related to recent work in the economics of privacy (Acquisti et al. 2016; Heffetz and Ligett 2014; Goldfarb et al. 2015), which focuses on the role of privacy in facilitating the efficient use of cus- tomer data. Few papers have considered the economic tradeoff between privacy protection and data quality in the production of population statistics. Ghosh and Roth (2015), on which we build, and related papers in electronic commerce (Li et al. 2014) assume the demand for accuracy is exogenous. In some settings, this is appropriate -- for example, when a company is mining its customer data for in- ternal use. Publishing data summaries is, as we now show, another matter alto- gether. 1 Preliminary Concepts This section provides our formal definitions of privacy and data accuracy. Our definitions are based on a computer science literature studying formal privacy, and so may be unfamiliar to economists. Our summary draws on several sources to which we refer the reader who is interested in more details (Hardt and Rothblum 2010; Dwork and Roth 2014; Wasserman and Zhou 2010; Heffetz and Ligett 2014; Abowd and Schmutte 2019). Our notation follows Dwork and Roth (2014). We introduce the notion of differential privacy, which is key to understand- 4 ing our analysis. Differentially private data publications do not allow an outsider to learn "too much" about any individual data record based on statistical sum- maries of the full database. For our purposes, this framework is useful because differential privacy tells us, for any level of data accuracy, how much privacy loss an efficient provider must be willing to tolerate. 1.1 Databases and Queries A data custodian (e.g., Facebook, Google, the U.S. Census Bureau) possesses a database, D. Think of D as a table in which each row represents information for a single individual and each column represents a single characteristic to be measured. The database D contains N rows. We assume all variables are dis- crete and finite-valued, but this is not restrictive since continuous data are always given discrete, finite representations when recorded on search logs, email con- tents, network features, social media posts, censuses, surveys, or administrative record systems. The notion of a neighboring database is crucial for the definition of differential privacy. Differential privacy captures the idea that published output should not change "too much" based on a single data item. We say database D′ is a neigh- boring database of D if D′ can be obtained by modifying a single row in D. We denote by D the set of all admissible databases.5 Data users are interested in learning answers to a database query. A query is a function, Q : D → RK that maps input databases, D ∈ D to a vector in RK. The concept of a database query can admit standard population statistics, like subgroup counts, means, variances, and so on, but is much broader. The case we 5Formally, D and D′ are neighbors if the ℓ1-norm of the difference in their histogram represen- tations is 2. See Appendix A.1. 5 consider in this paper focuses on publication of a single-valued query, but note that in general the query answer Q(D) may be vector-valued. 1.2 Query Release Mechanisms, Privacy, and Accuracy The data curator operates a query release mechanism that provides answers to queries Q given a database D. Definition 1 (Query Release Mechanism) Let Q be a set of admissible single-valued queries. A query release mechanism M is a random function M : D × Q → R whose inputs are a database D and a query Q. The mechanism output is a probabilistic response to the query. The probability of observing B ⊆ R is Pr [M(D, Q) ∈ BD, Q], the conditional probability, given D and Q, that the pub- lished query answer is in B ∈ B, where B are the measurable subsets of R. Differential Privacy Our definitions of differential privacy and accuracy for the query release mecha- nism follow Dwork et al. (2006) and Kifer and Machanavajjhala (2011). 6 Definition 2 (ε-differential privacy) Query release mechanism M satisfies ε-differential privacy if for ε > 0, for all pairs of neighboring databases D, D′, all queries Q ∈ Q, and all B ∈ B Pr [M(D, Q) ∈ BD, Q] ≤ eε Pr [M(D′, Q) ∈ BD′, Q] , 6Following the setup in Ghosh and Roth (2015), we are using the variant of differential privacy now known as bounded differential privacy. This means that the total number of records in the confidential database, called N below, is publicly known. 6 where B are the measurable subsets of R, and the randomness in M is due exclu- sively to the mechanism and not the process generating the database D. Accuracy We next define our measure of accuracy. For any query, Q ∈ Q, the query release mechanism returns an answer, a, that depends on the input database, the con- tent of the query response, and the randomization induced by the query release mechanism. Definition 3 ((α, β)-accuracy) Query release mechanism M satisfies (α, β)-accuracy if for Q ∈ Q and a output from M(D, Q), Pr(cid:16)a − Q(D) ≤ α(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) D, Q(cid:17) ≥ 1 − β where a, Q(D) ∈ R. This definition guarantees that the error in the answer provided by the mechanism is bounded above by α with probability (1−β).7 The probabilities in the definition of (α, β)-accuracy are induced by the query release mechanism. 1.3 Example To illustrate the problem stylized by the model, consider the following scenario. Under Public Law 94-171, the U.S. Census Bureau publishes the number of individuals of Hispanic origin in each census block. Many blocks have small pop- ulations. Publishing the size of the Hispanic population without statistical disclo- sure limitation can lead to disclosure of the ethnicity of individuals in that block. 7This definition also appears in a more general form in Gupta et al. (2012). 7 Framed in terms of the model, the database of interest, D, has one row for each person in a given block, and includes a binary indicator of their Hispanic origin. A neighboring database, D′, has the same rows, but the Hispanic origin is changed for exactly one entry. The query of interest, Q(D), is the proportion of individuals of Hispanic origin in the block. If the Census Bureau publishes the answer to Q(D) exactly, then an attacker who knows the Hispanic origin of all but one individual can learn the origin of the remaining individual with certainty. If, instead, it publishes a noisy proportion under a differentially private query release mechanism, M(D, Q), such an attacker will remain uncertain of the origin of the remaining individual. The question is whether the noisy proportion still measures the true proportion with sufficient accuracy. In the preceding example, the attribute of interest is a binary indicator. This may seem to be a restrictive assumption. As we noted earlier, continuous data are generally given discrete, finite representations when recorded in databases. For instance, Public Law 94-171 also requires publication of the number of individu- als in blocks and tracts, classified by age, a continuous feature. However, in the database D, age is discretized to single years, and for block-level tabulations, to year ranges. An 52-year old individual is thus recorded as the binary response to the query "age = 52". More generally, our model applies for publication of any predicate query that asks whether an individual's characteristics satisfy a set of binary conditions. 2 Private Provision of Population Statistics In this section, we model a data provider selling public statistics produced accord- ing to a differentially private mechanism by purchasing rights to use records in an 8 underlying confidential database. Since accuracy and privacy protection are both public goods, the consequences of private provision are theoretically ambiguous until further structure is placed on the model. Given the structure below, we prove that too little data accuracy and too much privacy will be supplied by a private provider compared to the social welfare maximizing solution. 2.1 Model Setup Each of N private individuals possesses a single bit of information, bi, that is al- ready stored in a database maintained by a trusted curator.8 In addition to their private information, each individual is endowed with income, yi. Individuals each consume one unit of the published statistic, which has accu- racy I defined in terms of (α, β)-accuracy, that is I = (1 − α). Since I is a public good, all consumers enjoy the benefits of I, but each consumer is charged the market price pI, to be determined within the model, for her "share" of I, which we denote Ii, and the balance of the public good, which we denote I i is paid for by the other consumers. Thus, I = Ii + I i for all consumers. The preferences of consumer i are given by the indirect utility function vi(cid:0)yi, εi, Ii, I i(cid:1) = ln yi + pεεi − γiεi + ηi(cid:0)Ii + I i(cid:1) − pIIi. (1) Equation (1) implies that preferences are quasilinear in data accuracy, I, privacy loss, εi, and log income, ln yi.9 We incorporate income and accuracy in the utility 8Trusted curator can have a variety of meanings. We mean that the database is held by an entity, governmental or private, whose legal authority to hold the data is not challenged and whose physical data security is adequate to prevent privacy breaches due to theft of the confidential data themselves. We do not model how the trusted curator got possession of the data, but we do restrict all publications based on these data to use statistics produced by a query release mechanism that meets the same privacy and confidentiality constraints. 9In this section, we keep the description of preferences for data accuracy and privacy protection 9 function because they are required for the arguments in this section. The term pε is the common price per unit of privacy, also to be determined by the model. The receipt pεεi represents the total payment an individual receives if her bit is used in an ε-differentially private mechanism. The individual's marginal preferences for data accuracy (a "good") and privacy loss (a "bad," really an input here), (ηi, γi) > 0, are not known to the data provider, but their population distri- butions are public information. Therefore, the mechanism for procuring privacy has to be individually rational and dominant-strategy truthful. We do not include any explicit interaction between the publication of statisti- cal data and the market for private goods. This assumption is not without conse- quence, and we make it to facilitate exposition of our key point: that data accuracy may be under-provided due to its public-good properties. Violations of privacy might affect the goods market through targeted advertising and price discrimina- tion. The accuracy of public statistics may also spill over to the goods market by making firms more efficient. These are topics for future work. 2.2 The Cost of Producing Data Accuracy A supplier of statistical information wants to produce an (α, β)-accurate estimate, s, of the population statistic s = 1 N bi N Xi=1 (2) i.e., a normalized query estimating the proportion of individuals with the property encoded in bi. This property could be something highly sensitive, such as the individual's citizenship status, sexual orientation, or whether she suffers from a as close as possible to the GR specification. They allow for the possibility that algorithms exist that can provide differential privacy protection that varies with i; hence εi appears in equation (1). They subsequently prove that εi = ε for all i in their Theorem 3.3. 10 particular health condition. Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 in Ghosh and Roth (2015) prove that publishing the statis- tic s = H 1 N  Xi=1  bi + αN 2(cid:16)1/2 + ln 1 β(cid:17) ε(cid:19) + Lap(cid:18)1  (3) from provides (α, β)-accuracy, and requires a privacy loss of εi = ε = 1/2+ln (1/β) H = N − the Laplace distribution with mean 0 and scale parameter 1 ε . 1/2+ln (1/β) members of the population. Lap(cid:0) 1 ε(cid:1) represents a draw from αN αN Purchasing the data-use rights from the H least privacy-loving members of the population; i.e., those with the smallest γi, is the minimum-cost, envy-free imple- mentation mechanism (Ghosh and Roth 2015).10 GR provide two mechanisms for implementing their VCG auction. We rely on their mechanism MinCostAuction and the properties given in their Proposition 4.5. See Appendix A.2 for additional details.11 We now derive the producer's problem of providing the statistic for a given level of data accuracy, I. If pε is the payment per unit of privacy loss, the total cost of production is c(I) = pεHε, where the right-hand side terms can be defined in terms of I as follows. Using the arguments above, the producer must purchase 10We note for completeness that the statistic s, while computed on only H cases from the popu- lation of N , is evaluated relative to the population quantity s. GR use the same accuracy measure as we do; namely Definition 3 with a single query in the query set, although they assume β = 1 throughout. We restrict the choice of β to β < 1/ (1 + √e); the threshold required by the proof 3 technique in GR, Theorem 3.1. Statisticians often use mean squared error instead of the absolute error embodied in this definition. Nevertheless, the statistic s also trades-off bias and variance relative to the correct population statistic. The term αN/ [2 (1/2 + ln (1/β))] is a bias correction. 11Note that the result in equation (3) holds regardless of any correlation between privacy pref- erences and data values. That is, even if it is biased, the summary produced using data from those consumers with the lowest privacy preferences still satisfies the accuracy guarantee. 11 from H(I) consumers the right to use their data to compute s. Then, H(I) = N − (1 − I)N 1/2 + ln (1/β) . (4) Under the VCG mechanism, the price of privacy loss must be pε = Q(cid:16) H(I) N (cid:17), where Q is the quantile function with respect to the population distribution of privacy preferences, Fγ. The lowest price at which the fraction H(I) N of consumers do better by selling the right to use their bit, bi, with ε (I) units of differential privacy is pε. H(I) is increasing in I. The total cost of producing I is C V CG(I) = Q(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19) H(I)ε(I), where the production technology derived by GR implies ε(I) = 1/2 + ln (1/β) (1 − I)N . (5) (6) 2.3 Example The results of Ghosh and Roth (2015) hold even with an arbitrary correlation be- tween privacy preferences and measured characteristics. Obtaining accuracy in the presence of potentially extreme selection bias makes it necessary to count al- most everyone. In practice, the costs of publication are determined by the level of privacy-loss required, and the preferences of someone with extreme aversion to privacy loss. Recall Example 1 from Section 1.3, which involved computing the share of the Hispanic population in a census block. If an analyst requires (0.2, 0.1)-accuracy in the estimate, then she must purchase privacy loss of ǫ ≈ 14/N from H = 0.93N people, or 93 percent of the block population. Note that the required privacy 12 loss, ǫ, vanishes as the block size N increases. To obtain a stronger guarantee of (0.05, 0.05)-accuracy would require purchasing ǫ ≈ 70/N from H = 0.99N people. A very weak guarantee of (0.4, 1/3)-accuracy only requires privacy loss of ǫ ≈ 4/N from H = 0.75N people. 3 Suboptimality of Private Provision Suppose a private profit-maximizing, price-taking, firm sells s with accuracy (α, β), that is, with data accuracy I at price pI. Then, profits P (I) are P (I) = pII − C V CG(I). implying If it sells at all, it will produce I to satisfy the first-order condition P ′(cid:0)I V CG(cid:1) = 0 pI = Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) H(I)ε′(I) +(cid:20)Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) + Q′(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19)(cid:21) H ′(I)ε(I) N (cid:19)(cid:18)H(I) (7) where the solution is evaluated at I V CG.12 The price of data accuracy is equal to the marginal cost of increasing the amount of privacy protection -- data-use rights -- that must be purchased. There are two terms. The first term is the increment to marginal cost from increasing the amount each privacy-right seller must be paid because ε has been marginally increased, thus reducing privacy protection for all. 12The second order condition is P ′′(cid:0)I V CG(cid:1) < 0, or d2C V CG(I) derivative of C V CG (I) that is not unambiguously positive is H(I)H ′(I)2ε(I) that this term is dominated by the other, always positive, terms in the second derivative. Sufficient conditions are that Q () is the quantile function from the log-normal distribution or the quantile function from a finite mixture of normals, and that H(I) N is sufficiently large; e.g., large enough so ≥ that if Q () is the quantile function from the ln N(cid:0)µ, σ2(cid:1) distribution, Q∗′′(cid:16) H(I) N (cid:17)2 N (cid:17)+σ2Q∗′(cid:16) H(I) 0, where Q∗ () is the standard normal quantile function. N (cid:17). We assume > 0. The only term in the second dI 2 N 2 Q′′(cid:16) H(I) 13 The second term is the increment to marginal cost from increasing the number of people from whom data-use rights with privacy protection ε must be purchased. As long as the cost function is strictly increasing and convex, the existence and uniqueness of a solution is guaranteed. 3.1 Competitive Market Equilibrium At market price pI, consumer i's willingness to pay for data accuracy will be given by solving max Ii≥0 ηi(cid:0)I i + Ii(cid:1) − pIIi (8) where I i is the amount of data accuracy provided from the payments by all other consumers, as noted above. Consumer i's willingness to pay is non-negative if, and only if, ηi ≥ pI; that is, if the marginal utility from increasing I exceeds the price. If there exists at least one consumer for whom ηi ≥ pI, then the solution to equation (7) is attained for I V CG > 0. We next show that there is only one such consumer. It is straightforward to verify that the consumers are playing a classic free-rider game (Mas-Colell et al. 1995, pp. 361-363). In the competitive equilibrium, the only person willing to pay for the public good is one with the maximum value of ηi. All others will purchase zero data accuracy but still consume the data accuracy purchased by this lone consumer. Specifically, the equilibrium price and data accuracy will satisfy pI = ¯η = dC V CG(cid:0)I V CG(cid:1) dI , where ¯η is the maximum value of ηi in the population -- the taste for accuracy of the person who desires it the most. However, the Pareto optimal consumption of 14 data accuracy, I 0, solves ηi = N Xi=1 dC V CG (I 0) dI . (9) Marginal cost is positive, i=1 ηi > ¯η; therefore, data ac- curacy will be under-provided by a competitive supplier when data accuracy > 0, and PN dC V CG(I 0) dI is a public good as long as marginal cost is increasing, which we prove below. More succinctly, I V CG < I 0. Therefore, privacy protection must be over-provided, εV CG < ε0, by equation (6).13 3.2 The Price-discriminating Monopsonist Provider of Data ac- curacy Now consider the problem of a single private data provider who produces s with accuracy (α, β) using the same technology as in equations (5) and (6). We now allow the producer to price-discriminate in the acquisition of data-use rights -- that is, the private data-accuracy supplier is a price discriminating monopsonist. This relaxes the assumptions of the VCG mechanism in GR to allow for the unrealis- tic possibility that the data accuracy provider knows the population values of γi. They acknowledge this theoretical possibility when discussing the individual ra- tionality and dominant-strategy truthful requirements of their mechanism. They reject it as unrealistic, and we agree. We are considering this possibility to show that even when the private data-accuracy provider is allowed to acquire data-use rights with a lower cost strategy than the VCG mechanism, data accuracy will still 13The reader is reminded that a smaller ε implies more privacy protection. It is also worth commenting that in the GR formulation the single consumer with positive willingness to pay is the entity running the VCG auction. That person is buying data-use rights from the other consumers, computing the statistic for publication, then releasing the statistic so that all other consumers may use it. That is why we have modeled this as a public good. Our formulation is fully consistent with GR's scientist seeking data for a grant-supported publication. 15 be under-provided. The producer must decide how many data-use rights (and associated privacy loss ε, the same value for all i) to purchase from each member of the database, or, equivalently, how much to charge members of the database to opt out of par- ticipation in the mechanism for computing the statistic. (They cannot opt out of the database.) Let π ∈ {0, 1}N be the participation vector. Using the Lindahl ap- proach, let pL εi be the price that satisfies, for each consumer i, pL εi ≤ γi, with equality if πi = 1. (10) Equation (10) says that the Lindahl prices are those such that the choice of ε is exactly the value that each individual would optimally choose on her own. Even with our assumption of linear preferences, the Lindahl prices are unique for every consumer who participates in the mechanism for computing the statistic. Given a target data accuracy of I = (1 − α), the producer's cost minimization problem is the linear program C L (I) = min π N Xi=1 πipL εi! ε (11) subject to N Xi=1 πi = N − (1 − I)N 1/2 + ln (1/β) and ε = 1/2 + ln (1/β) (1 − I)N . The solution is for the producer to set πi = 1 for the H members of the database with the smallest pL εi and πi = 0, otherwise. Note that if dC L (I) dI < dC V CG(I) dI 16 for all I, which will be proven in Theorem 1, then the Lindahl purchaser of data- use rights will produce more data accuracy at any given price of data accuracy than the VCG purchaser. By construction, the Lindahl solution satisfies the Pareto optimality criterion for data-use rights acquisition that πipL εi = N Xi=1 πiγi. N Xi=1 (12) Once again, the supplier implements the query response mechanism of equa- tion (3) with 1/2+ln (1/β) (1−I)N -differential privacy and (1 − I, β)-accuracy but pays each consumer differently for her data-use right. Notice that equation (12) describes the Pareto optimal privacy loss whether or not one acknowledges that the privacy protection afforded by ε is non-rival, only partially excludable, and, therefore, also a public good. To implement the Lindahl solution, the data producer must be able to exclude the bits, bi, of specific individuals when computing the statistic, and must have perfect knowledge of the every marginal disutility γi of increasing ε. When this information is not available, the producer can, and will, implement the first-best allocation by choosing a price through the VCG auction mechanism used by GR. For readers familiar with the data privacy literature, we note that the statement that technology is given by equations (5) and (6) means that the data custodian from H (I) individuals for the sole purpose of computing s via the allows the producer to purchase data-use rights with accompanying privacy loss of ε = 1/2+ln (1/β) query response mechanism in equation (3) that is 1/2+ln (1/β) and achieves (1 − I, β)-accuracy, which is exactly what Ghosh and Roth prove. (1−I)N (1−I)N -differentially private 17 3.3 Proof of Suboptimality Theorem 1 If preferences are given by equation (1), the query response mechanism satisfies equation (6) for ε-differential privacy with (1 − I, β)-accuracy, cost func- tions satisfy (5) for the VCG mechanism, and (11) for the Lindahl mechanism, the population distribution of γ is given by Fγ (bounded, absolutely continuous, ev- erywhere differentiable, and with quantile function Q satisfying the conditions noted in Section 3), the population distribution of η has bounded support on [0, ¯η], and the population in the database is represented as a continuum with measure function H (absolutely continuous, everywhere differentiable, and with total mea- sure N) then I V CG < I L and I V CG < I 0, where I 0 is the Pareto optimal level of I solving equation (9), I L is the privately-provided level when using the Lindahl mechanism to procure data-use rights and I V CG is the privately-provided level when using the VCG procurement mechanism. Proof. By construction, Fγ(γ) is the distribution of Lindahl prices. Given a target error bound α, corresponding to data accuracy level I = (1− α), the private producer must procure data-use rights from the respondents in the confidential data with ε(I) units of privacy protection from a measure of H(I) individuals. Define pℓ N (cid:19) , ε = Q(cid:18)H(I) for ℓ = V CG, L. Note that pℓ ε is the disutility of privacy loss for the marginal participant in the VCG and Lindahl mechanisms, respectively. The total cost of producing I = (1 − α) using the VCG mechanism is equation (5): C V CG(I) = Q(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19) H(I)ε(I). 18 while the total cost of implementing the Lindahl mechanism is equation (11): C L(I) = NZ Q( H(I) 0 N ) γdFγ(γ)! ε(I). Using integration by parts and the properties of the quantile function, C L(I) = "Q(cid:18)H(I) = "Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) Fγ(cid:18)Q(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19) H(I) − NZ Q( H(I) 0 N ) Fγ(γ)dγ# ε(I). N ) N (cid:19)(cid:19) −Z Q( H(I) 0 Fγ(γ)dγ# Nε(I) Differentiating with respect to I, dC L(I) dI ="Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) H(I) − NZ Q( H(I) 0 N ) Fγ(γ)dγ# ε′(I) + Q(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19) H ′(I)ε(I). The corresponding expression for C V CG(I) is dC V CG(I) dI = Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) H(I)ε′(I) +(cid:20)Q(cid:18)H(I) N (cid:19) + Q′(cid:18) H(I) N (cid:19) H(I) N (cid:21) H ′(I)ε(I). Comparison of the preceding marginal cost expressions establishes that 0 < dC L(I) dC V CG(I) Fγ(γ)dγ > 0, ε′(I) > 0, H ′(I) > 0, and Q′ () > 0. N ) dI < dI The results stated in the theorem follow by using the equilibrium price for the for all I, since NR Q( H(I) 0 private market sale of I, which is pI in equation (1), pI = ¯η = dC L(I L) dI = dC V CG(I V CG) dI . Hence, I V CG < I L, since dC L(I L) d2C V CG(I) dI dI 2 > 0. Likewise, I V CG < I 0, sincePN < dC V CG(I L) dI and the conditions on Q imply that i=1 ηi > ¯η, and d2C V CG(I) dI 2 > 0. 19 4 Conclusion The concept of differential privacy allows a natural interpretation of privacy pro- tection as a commodity over which individuals might have preferences. In many important contexts, privacy protection and data accuracy are not purely private commodities. When both are public goods, the market allocations might not be optimal. The solution to the social planning problem that optimally provides both public goods -- data accuracy and privacy protection -- delivers more data accuracy, but less privacy protection, than the VCG mechanism for private-provision of data. The reason is that the VCG mechanism for procuring data-use rights ig- nores the public-good nature of the statistics that are published after a citizen sells the right to use her private data in those publications. This matters because the demand for public data is greater than ever, while funding for statistical agencies has been relatively stagnant. It is increasingly likely that data users will turn to private companies to obtain the information they demand. Our results suggest that, while the policy debate has centered on regulating the privacy loss from this trend, it is also important to counterbalance the demand for privacy against the social value of reliable population statistics. Abowd and Schmutte (2019) propose a model for determining the optimal bal- ance between privacy and accuracy in this social choice framework. More re- search, both theoretical and empirical, will help data users and policy makers navigate our modern data-rich environment. The VCG mechanism also underprovides accuracy compared with the ficti- tious Lindahl mechnanism. We did not identify any relation between optimal provision and the Lindahl mechanism, suggesting our results are sensitive to the setup. Our model inherits some limitations (e.g., simple market structure) of the original GR framework. We also inherit the positive aspects of their model. In par- 20 ticular, the results of GR's Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 are not tied to a specific auction mechanism. In concluding, we point out possible extensions of our model. We have as- sumed a private data custodian must purchase privacy rights in order to use data in a published statistic. We make this assumption because it reflects the growing demand that companies be held accountable for the privacy of their customers' data through increasingly explicit means. However, if we assume companies may freely use their customers' data, then our conclusions will likely be reversed, with privacy being under-provided. To address this possibility, one might consider al- ternative specifications for the property rights over privacy loss. Similarly, our model assumes that private firms are limited to the single-buyer model in their ability to elicit payment from customers for data accuracy. One might explore alternative formulations of the demand side of the market, including the use of governmental organizations as the preference aggregators in making the purchase offer. This extension mirrors the original Ghosh-Roth motivation of a researcher spending grant money to buy the statistic, then placing the result in an open- access scientific journal. Finally, our model treats the data held by a trusted data curator as ground truth. Data users concerns for accuracy will likely extend be- yond our model's treatment of differential privacy as the focal source of error in the underlying database. We need better accuracy measurements and tools for incorporating other sources of error from the data generation process (e.g., edit constraints, imputation, coverage error) into the social choice problem. 21 Bibliography Abowd, J. M. and Schmutte, I. M. (2019). An economic analysis of privacy protection and statistical accuracy as social choices, American Economic Review 109(1): 171 -- 202. Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. and Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy, Journal of Economic Literature 54(2): 442 -- 492. URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.54.2.442 Antenucci, D., Cafarella, M., Levenstein, M., Re, C. and Shapiro, M. D. (2014). Us- ing social media to measure labor market flows, Working Paper 20010, National Bureau of Economic Research. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w20010 Cavallo, A. and Rigobon, R. (2016). The billion prices project: Using online prices for measurement and research, Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(2): 151 -- 78. URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.30.2.151 Choi, H. and Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with Google trends, Eco- nomic Record 88: 2 -- 9. Differential Privacy Team (2017). Learning with privacy at scale, Apple Machine Learning Journal 1(8). URL: https://machinelearning.apple.com/2017/12/06/learning-with-privacy-at- scale.html Dinur, I. and Nissim, K. (2003). Revealing information while preserving privacy, Proceedings of the Twenty-second ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on 22 Principles of Database Systems, PODS '03, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 202 -- 210. URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/773153.773173 Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy, Proceedings of the 33rd International Collo- quium on Automata, Languages and Programming pp. 1 -- 12. URL: N/A Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K. and Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis, Proceedings of the Third conference on The- ory of Cryptography, TCC06, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 265 -- 284. DOI:10.1007/11681878 14. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11681878 14 Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K. and Smith, A. (2017). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis, Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 7(3): 17 -- 51. URL: https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.v7i3.405 Dwork, C. and Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy, Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 9(3-4): 211 -- 407. URL: http://www.nowpublishers.com/articles/foundations-and-trends-in-theoretical- computer-science/TCS-042 Erlingsson, ´U., Pihur, V. and Korolova, A. (2014). RAPPOR: Randomized Ag- gregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security - CCS '14 pp. 1054 -- 1067. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2660267.2660348 23 Ghosh, A. and Roth, A. (2015). Selling privacy at auction, Games and Economic Behavior 91: 334 -- 346. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825613000961 Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S. M. and Tucker, C. E. (2015). Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. URL: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6jPBBwAAQBAJ Gupta, A., Roth, A. and Ullman, J. (2012). Iterative constructions and private data release, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory of Cryptography, TCC12, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 339 -- 356. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-28914-9 19 Hardt, M. and Rothblum, G. N. (2010). A multiplicative weights mechanism for privacy-preserving data analysis, 2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Founda- tions of Computer Science pp. 61 -- 70. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5670948 Heffetz, O. and Ligett, K. (2014). Privacy and data-based research, Journal of Eco- nomic Perspectives 28(2): 75 -- 98. Spring. URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.28.2.75 Kifer, D. and Machanavajjhala, A. (2011). No free lunch in data privacy, Proceed- ings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '11, ACM Digital Library, New York, NY, USA, pp. 193 -- 204. URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1989323.1989345 Li, C., Li, D. Y., Miklau, G. and Suciu, D. A. N. (2014). A theory of pricing private data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 39(4): 34:1 -- 34:27. Pages 34:1 -- 34:27. URL: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2448496.2448502 24 Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. and Green, J. (1995). Microeconomic theory, Oxford student edition, Oxford University Press. Ruggles, S., Fitch, C., Magnuson, D. and Schroeder, J. (2019). Differential privacy and Census data: Implications for social and economic research, American Eco- nomic Association Papers and Proceedings 109. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure, Review of Eco- nomics and Statistics 37: 387 -- 389. Spence, A. M. (1975). Monopoly, quality, and regulation, The Bell Journal of Eco- nomics 6(2): 417 -- 429. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3003237 Wasserman, L. and Zhou, S. (2010). A Statistical Framework for Differential Pri- vacy, Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(489): 375 -- 389. Wood, A., Altman, M., Bembenek, A., Bun, M., Gaboardi, M., Honaker, J., Nissim, K., O'Brien, D. R., Steinke, T. and Vadhan, S. (2018). Differential privacy: A primer for a non-technical audience, 21(1). URL: http://www.jetlaw.org/journal-archives/volume-21/volume-21-issue- 1/differential-privacy-a-primer-for-a-non-technical-audience/ 25 APPENDIX A.1 Formal definition of neighboring databases We can represent any database D by its un-normalized histogram x ∈ Z∗χ. The notation χ represents the cardinality of the set χ, from which database entries (rows) are drawn, and Z∗ is the set of non-negative integers. Each entry in x, xi, is the number of elements in the database D of type i ∈ χ. The ℓ1 norm of x is x1 = χ Xi=1 xi . (13) Observe that x1 = N, the number of records in the database. Given two his- tograms, x and y, x − y1 measures the number of records that differ between x and y. We define adjacent histograms as those with equal ℓ1 norm and between which the ℓ1 distance is 2. If x is the histogram representation of D, y is the histogram representation of D′, and D′ is constructed from D by modifying exactly one row, then x1 = y1 and x− y1 = 2. So, D and D′ are adjacent databases and x and y are the adjacent histogram representations of D and D′, respectively. Some caution is required when reviewing the related literature because definitions may be stated in terms of adjacent databases or adjacent histograms. A.2 Translation of the Ghosh-Roth Model to Our Notation In this appendix we show that the results in our Section 2, based on the definitions in the text using database histograms and normalized queries, are equivalent to the results in Ghosh and Roth (2015). In what follows, definitions and theorems tagged GR refer to the original Ghosh and Roth (GR, hereafter) paper. Untagged App. 1 definitions and theorems refer to our results in the text. GR model a database D ∈ {0, 1}n where there is a single bit, bi, taking values in {0, 1} for a population of individuals i = 1, . . . , n. In GR-Definition 2.1, they define a query release mechanism A (D), a randomized algorithm that maps {0, 1}n → R, as εi-differentially private if for all measurable subsets S of R and for any pair of databases D and D(i) such that H(cid:0)D, D(i)(cid:1) = 1 Pr [A (D) ∈ S] Pr [A (D(i)) ∈ S] ≤ eεi where H(cid:0)D, D(i)(cid:1) is the Hamming distance between D and D(i). Notice that their use of the Hamming distance to define neighboring databases is consistent with our use of "bounded" differential privacy. However, this is not the standard defi- nition of ε-differential privacy, which they take from Dwork et al. (2006), because a "worst-case" extremum is not included. The parameter εi is specific to individ- ual i. The amount of privacy loss algorithm A permits for individual i, whose bit bi is the one that is toggled in D(i), is potentially different from the privacy loss allowed for individual j 6= i, whose privacy loss may be εj > εi from the same algorithm. In this case, individual j could also achieve εj-differentially privacy if the parameter εi were substituted for εj. To refine this definition so that it also cor- responds to an extremum with respect to each individual, GR-Definition 2.1 adds the condition that algorithm A is εi-minimally differentially private with respect to individual i if εi = arg inf ε (cid:26) Pr [A (D) ∈ S] Pr [A (D(i)) ∈ S] ≤ eε(cid:27) , which means that for individual i, the level of differential privacy afforded by the algorithm A (D) is the smallest value of ε for which algorithm A achieves ε- differential privacy for individual i. In GR εi-differentially private always means App. 2 εi-minimally differentially private. GR-Fact 1, stated without proof, but see Dwork and Roth (2014, p. 42-43 ) for a proof, says that εi-minimal differential privacy composes. That is, if algorithm A (D) is εi-minimally differentially private, T ⊂ {1, . . . , n} , and D, D(T ) ∈ {0, 1}n with H(cid:0)D, D(T )(cid:1) = T, then Pr [A (D) ∈ S] Pr [A (D(T )) ∈ S] ≤ e{Pi∈T εi}, where D(T ) differs from D only on the indices in T . In the population, the statistic of interest is an unnormalized query s = bi. n Xi=1 The εi-minimally differentially private algorithm A (D) delivers an output s that is a noisy estimate of s, where the noise is induced by randomness in the query release mechanism embedded in A. Each individual in the population when of- fered a payment pi > 0 in exchange for the privacy loss εi > 0 computes an individual privacy cost equal to υiεi, where υi > 0, p ≡ (p1, . . . , pn) ∈ Rn +, and υ ≡ (υ1, . . . , υn) ∈ Rn +. GR define a mechanism M as a function that maps Rn + × {0, 1}n → R × Rn using an algorithm A (D) that is εi (υ)-minimally differentially private to deliver a query response s ∈ R and a vector of payments p (υ) ∈ Rn defines individually rational mechanisms. GR-Definition 2.5 defines dominant- +. GR-Definition 2.4 + strategy truthful mechanisms. An individually rational, dominant-strategy truth- ful mechanism M provides individual i with utility pi (υ) − υiεi (υ) ≥ 0 and pi (υ) − υiεi (υ) ≥ pi(cid:0)υi, υ′ +, where υi is the vec- i(cid:1) − υiεi(cid:0)υi, υ′ i(cid:1) for all υ′ tor υ with element υi removed. i ∈ Rn App. 3 GR define k-accuracy in GR-Definition 2.6 using the deviation s − s from the output s produced by algorithm A (D) using mechanism M as Pr [s − s ≥ k] ≤ 1 3 . where we have reversed the direction of the inequalities and taken the comple- mentary probability to show that this is the unnormalized version of our Defi- nition 3 for a query sequence of length 1. GR also define the normalized query accuracy level as α, which is identical to our usage in Definition 3. GR-Theorem 3.1 uses the GR definitions of εi-minimal differential privacy, k- accuracy, and GR-Fact 1 composition to establish that any differentially private 1 mechanism M that is (cid:0) αn 4 (cid:1)-accurate must purchase privacy loss of at least εi ≥ αn from at least H ≥ (1 − α) n individuals in the population. GR-Theorem 3.3 establishes the existence of a differentially private mechanism that is(cid:0) 1 2 + ln 3(cid:1) αn- accurate and selects a set of individuals H ⊂ {1, . . . , n} with εi = 1 αn for all i ∈ H and H = (1 − α) n. In order to understand the implications of GR-Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 and our ar- guments about the public-good properties of differential privacy, consider the ap- plication of GR-Definition 2.3 (Lap (σ) noise addition) to construct an ε-differentially private response to the counting query based on GR-Theorem 3.3 with H = (1 − α) n and the indices ordered such that H = {1, . . . ,H}. The resulting an- swer from the query response mechanism is s = H Xi=1 bi + αn 2 ε(cid:19) , + Lap(cid:18)1 which is the counting query version of equation (3) in the text. Note the bias cor- rection term αn/2 is adjusted in equation (3) as necessitated by our use of(cid:0)α, 1 3(cid:1)- App. 4 accuracy. Because of GR-Theorem 3.3, we can use a common ε = 1 αn in equation (3). If this were not true, then we would have to consider query release mecha- nisms that had different values of ε for each individual in the population and therefore the value that enters equation (3) would be much more complicated. To ensure that each individual in H received εi-minimally differential privacy, the algorithm would have to use the smallest εi that was produced for any individ- ual. In addition, the FairQuery and MinCostAuction algorithms described next would not work because they depend upon being able to order the cost functions υiεi by υi, which is not possible unless εi is a constant or υi and εi are perfectly positively correlated. Effectively, GR-Theorem 3.3 proves that achieving (α, β)- accuracy with ε-differential privacy requires a mechanism in which everyone who sells a data-use right gets the best protection (minimum εi over all i ∈ H) offered to anyone in the analysis sample. If a change in the algorithm's parameters results in a lower minimum εi, everyone who opts to use the new parameterization re- ceives this improvement. In addition, we argue in the text that when such mech- anisms are used by a government agency they are also non-excludable because exclusion from the database violates equal protection provisions of the laws that govern these agencies. Next, GR analyze algorithms that achieve O (an)-accuracy by purchasing ex- αn units of privacy loss from exactly (1 − α) n individuals. Their algorithms actly 1 FairQuery and MinCostAuction have the same basic structure: • Sort the individuals in increasing order of their privacy cost, υ1 ≤ υ2 ≤ . . . ≤ υn. • Find the cut-off value υk that either exhausts a budget constraint (FairQuery) or meets an accuracy constraint (MinCostAuction). App. 5 • Assign the set H = {1, . . . , k} . • Calculate the statistic s using a differentially private algorithm that adds Laplace noise with just enough dispersion to achieve the required differen- tial privacy for the privacy loss purchased from the members of H. • Pay all members of H the same amount, a function of υk+1; pay all others nothing. To complete the summary of GR, we note that GR-Theorem 4.1 establishes that FairQuery is dominant-strategy truthful and individually rational. GR-Proposition 4.4 establishes that FairQuery maximizes accuracy for a given total privacy pur- chase budget in the class of all dominant-strategy truthful, individually rational, envy-free, fixed-purchase mechanisms. GR-Proposition 4.5 proves that their al- gorithm MinCostAuction is a VCG mechanism that is dominant-strategy truth- ful, individually rational and O (αn)-accurate. GR-Theorem 4.6 provides a lower bound on the total cost of purchasing k units of privacy of kυk+1 GR-Theorem 5.1 establishes that for υ ∈ Rn privacy of valuations υ with (k, β)-accuracy for k < n 2 . +, no individually rational mechanism can protect the In our application of GR, we use N as the total population. Our γi is identical to the GR υi. We define the query as a normalized query, which means that query accuracy is defined in terms of α instead of k; hence, our implementation of the VCG mechanism achieves (α, β) where the inclusion of β generalizes GR's implicit restriction to β = 1 3 in their accuracy definition. We define the individual amount of privacy loss in the same manner as GR. App. 6
1907.12624	1	1907	2019-07-29T20:20:09	A Production Function with Variable Elasticity of Factor Substitution	[ "econ.TH" ]	The main aim of this paper is to prove the existence of a new production function with variable elasticity of factor substitution. This production function is a more general form which includes the Cobb-Douglas production function and the CES production function as particular cases. The econometric estimates presented in the paper confirm some other results and reinforces the conclusion that the sigma is well-below the Cobb-Douglas value of one.	econ.TH	econ	A Production Function with Variable Elasticity of Factor Substitution Constantin Chilarescu 9 2 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 4 2 6 2 1 . 7 0 9 1 : v i X r a Laboratoire CLERSE Universit´e de Lille, France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The main aim of this paper is to prove the existence of a new pro- duction function with variable elasticity of factor substitution. This production function is a more general form which includes the Cobb- Douglas production function and the C ES production function as particular cases. The econometric estimates presented in the paper confirm some other results and reinforces the conclusion that the sigma is well-below the Cobb-Douglas value of one. Keywords: variable elasticity of factor substitution; production function. JEL Classifications: C50, C60, D20 1 Introduction The CES production function developed by Arrow et al. (1961) is one of the most known and analysed production function. It has been extensively stud- ied both in regard to its theoretical properties and its empirical implications. A large number of papers were published on this subject and some authors tried to generalize the result obtained by Arrow et al., based especially on the two weakest points of this function. The first one refers to the assump- tion that there exists a relationship only between the value added per capita and wage rates, independent of the per capita stock of capital. The second one refers to the fact that the elasticity of factor substitution is a positive constant. As it is well-known, some econometric studies suggested that the 1 elasticity of factor substitution is strongly correlated with the capital labor ratio. Wise and Yeh (1965) compared production functions of several coun- tries and found that the elasticity of factor substitution first increases (to a value above unity) and then decreases (to a value below unity) as capital accumulates faster than labor. As a consequence of the paper published by Arrow et al., the next decades have witnessed an enormous increase in the amount of papers dedicated to the study of production functions. Among these papers, we mention here only those with a significant impact on the later developments, as it was the case of the papers of: Uzawa (1962, 1967), McFadden (1963), Liu and Hildebrand (1965), Dhrymes (1965), Kmenta (1967), Sato (1967, 1970, 1975, 1980), Sato and Hoffman (1968), Lu and Fletcher (1968), Zellner and Revankar (1969), Revankar (1971), Beckman et al. (1972), Kim (1992), De La Grandville (1997) and Barellia and Pessoa (2003). As it is well-known, the elasticity of factor substitution is a measure of the ease to shift between capital and labour. Accordingly to this definition, the elasticity of factor substitution varies with the capital labor ratio. The larger the elasticity of factor substitution, the easier to substitute and vice versa. Therefore, it is difficult to accept that the elasticity of factor substitution could be a constant, and even less that it could be equal to one, as is the case with the Cobb Douglas function. Some recent studies confirm this hypothesis (see for example the paper of Mallick 2012). As we pointed out above, some econometric studies show that this mea- sure has first an increasing trajectory for increasing values of k and then a decreasing one. In other words, this function is first an increasing concave function of k and then a convex decreasing function of k. As was pointed out by Klump and De La Grandville (2000), if the production function is homo- geneous of degree one (and this is the case of production functions considered in this paper) and if the elasticity of factor substitution is less than one, we may wonder whether the elasticity of substitution would be an increasing function of k for large values of k. This claim seems to be true, but only for some values of k lower than a limit of saturation. 2 2 Some Production Functions with Variable Elasticity of Substitution In this paper, we consider only the case of production functions assumed to be homogeneous of degree one. Among the production functions with variable elasticity of factor substitution considered here, only two seem to respect this property, the production function developed by Liu and Hildebrand, and that provided by Lu and Fletcher. The first tentative to generalize the CES production function is that of Liu and Hildebrand. They have obtained the first production function with a variable elasticity of factor substitution. Liu and Hildebrand assumed a log-linear relationship between output per- capita y = y(k) = F (K,L) , wage rate ω = y − ky ′ and the capital labor ratio k = K L L ln (y) = ln (a) + b ln (ω) + c ln (k) , (1) where a, b and c are assumed to be non-negative real constants (see the doctoral thesis of Lu, 1967). The equation (1) may be successively rewritten y = a(cid:18)y − k dy dk(cid:19)b dk(cid:19)b kc ⇒ y = a(cid:18)y2 dz kc, z = k y , and after some manipulations we find 1−2b−c b k dk = a 1 b z 1−2b b dz, (2) (3) so that, under the hypotheses b 6= 1 and b + c 6= 1, integrating one obtains 1−b−c b bk 1 − b − c = 1−b b bz 1 − b 1 b + ξ ⇒ a (1 − b)a− 1 1 − b − c b k− c b + ξ(b − 1)a− 1 b b b−1 b = y k b−1 b , (4) where ξ is a constant of integration and thus the production function is given by. y = a b b−1 . (5) 1 1−b (cid:20) ξ(b − 1) b b−1 b + k b − 1 b + c − 1 k− c b(cid:21) We can express this function in terms of K and L and thus we finally obtain F (K, L) = a 1 1−b (cid:20) ξ(b − 1) b K b−1 b + b − 1 b + c − 1 K − c b L b b−1 . b+c−1 b (cid:21) (6) 3 Let R = R(k) stand for the marginal rate of substitution between K and L, that is R = FL/FK, where FX signifies the derivative of F w.r.t. X. Then the elasticity of substitution σ = σ(k) is defined simply as the elasticity of k = K/L with respect to R, that is σ = dk R . Under the hypothesis of a homogeneous production function of degree one, the marginal rate of sub- stitution and the elasticity of substitution can be expressed in the following representation k / dR R(k) = − k y y ′ and σ(k) = y ′ (ky ′ − y) kyy ′′ . (7) (8) For the function given by relation (5), the marginal rate of substitution and the elasticity of factor substitution will be given by R(k) = −b(b + c − 1)k ξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1)k b+c−1 b + bc , (9) σ(k) = bhξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1)k ξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1)(1 − c)k b + bci b+c−1 b + b2c b+c−1 . (10) The derivatives wrt k yield R′(k) = −(b + c − 1) σ′(k) = ξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1) ξ(1 − b)(1 − c)(b + c − 1)k b+c−1 b + b2c hξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1)k b+c−1 b + bci2 bc(b + c − 1)2k− c+1 b hξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1)(1 − c)k b−1 b + b2ck− c , (11) bi2 , (12) and therefore the sign of σ′(k) will depend on the sign of ξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1). In his doctoral thesis, Lu proved that c < β < 1, where β is the relative share of capital. We observe from this relation that the constant ξ will influence only the speed of increase or decrease of σ. Let us now examine the properties of this production function. 1. If c = 0 and b 6= 1, then we get R(k) = 1−δ b , δ = ξ(b−1) that is we are in the case of the CES production function. δ k 1 b+ξ(b−1) and σ = b, 4 2. If we put now b = 1, then we obtain R(k) = 1−β β k, δ = β and σ = 1, that is we are in the case of the Cobb-Douglas production function. The same result will be obtained via the relation (1). If we put c = 0 a−1k, with a = 1 and b = 1, then we get R(k) = 1 1−β , or alternatively, if we consider b = 0 and c 6= 0, to obtain R(k) = 1−c c k, with c = β. 3. If b, c ∈ (0, 1) and b + c > 1, then R(k) → −b2 ξ(1 − b)(b + c − 1) 1−c b , ξ < 0 and σ(k) → k b 1 − c , representing the property of a CES production function. As we can observe from the relations (11) and (12), R is an increasing function of k, and σ is a decreasing function of k. 4. If b, c ∈ (0, 1) and b + c < 1, then R(k) → 1 − b − c c k, ξ < 0 and σ(k) → 1, representing the property of a Cobb-Douglas production function. As we can observe from the relations (11) and (12), both R and σ are a increasing function of k. A few years later, Lu (1967) and Lu and Fletcher (1968), assuming the same log-linear relationship (1), but using a different computational procedure, provided another production function with variable elasticity of factor sub- stitution. The equation (1) may be successively rewritten dy dk = y k − a− 1 b k− c b −1y 1 b ⇒ dz dk + 1 − b b z k = a− 1 b 1 − b b k− c b −1, (13) with z = y1− 1 b . This last equation cab be still written + 1 − b b z k(cid:21) = a− 1 b 1 − b b 1−2b−c b , k 1 b k or equivalently, whose solution gives dk −1(cid:20) dz dk hk d 1 b −1zi = a− 1 b 1 − b b 1−2b−c b , k z = a− 1 b 1 − b 1 − b − c k− c b + ζk 1 b −1 5 (14) (15) where ζ is a constant of integration. By transforming z back to y, yields the following production function y = a 1 1−b (cid:20)ζa 1 b k b−1 b + b − 1 b + c − 1 k− c b(cid:21) b b−1 . (16) The elasticity of factor substitution yields σ(k) = ζb(1 − b − c)k ζ(1 − c)(1 − b − c)k b−1 b + bca− 1 b k− c b + bca− 1 b−1 b b k− c b . (17) We can easily prove that the two results obtained by Liu and Hildebrand and b a− 1 by Lu and Fletcher are in fact identical. Indeed, if we denote ζ = ξ b−1 b , then the production function determined by Liu and Hildebrand will coincide with that of Lu and Fletcher. In his doctoral thesis Lu proved that 0 < c < 1, but the problem is that we do not know the sign of the two constant of integration ζ and ξ and thus it is difficult to accept the conclusion of Lu, which claimed that the elasticity of factor substitution σ, depends only on the parameters b and c. Finally we point out here an interesting result of Sato (1967) and Sato and Hoffman (1968), who proved that if the elasticity of factor substitution is a linear function of the capital labor ratio, σ(k) = a + bk, (18) then a unique explicit production function exists. If a = 1, then it can be shown that this production function becomes F (K, L) = γK α(1−δρ) [L + (ρ − 1)K]αδρ , with δ ∈ (0, 1), δρ ∈ [0, 1], K L < 1 − δρ 1 − ρ and σ(k) = 1 + ρ − 1 1 − δρ k. This result was also obtained by Revankar (1971). 3 A new production function with variable elasticity of substitution As in the paper of Sato and Hoffman, we consider the case of a production function assumed to be homogeneous of degree one. Sato and Hoffman tried 6 to obtain some new production functions by considering various hypotheses on the elasticity of factor substitution σ. The method developed by the two authors, enables us to obtain the two well-known production functions. Indeed, if in equation (8) we put σ(k) = 1, then we obtain the Cobb-Douglas production function and if we put the σ(k) = σ = constant, then we obtain the CES production function. As it is well-known, the marginal rate of substitution tells us how much of one factor is needed to be removed, in order to compensate for an increase in another factor, so that the output remains unchanged. A simply compu- tational procedure shows that, in the case of the Cob-Douglas production function, we have R(k) = β 1−β k, or in other words, R depends linearly on k, and in the case of the CES production function we have R(k) = 1−δ σ , that is, R depends nonlinearly on k. δ k 1 Our approach, in order to obtain a new production function with variable elasticity of substitution, is different to that of cited authors. We do not focus on the elasticity of substitution, but on the marginal rate of substitution R. The main result of this paper is given by the following theorem. Theorem 1. If there exist three real constant λ 6= −1, µ 6= 0 and θ 6= 1 such that the marginal rate of substitution is given by R(k) = λk + µkθ, then the production function is given by: where ψ > 0 is a constant of integration. y = ψ(cid:2)(1 + λ) k1−θ + µ(cid:3) 1 (1+λ)(1−θ) , Proof. Substituting (19) into the equation (7) we get dy y = dk (1 + λ)k + µkθ . The above equation can be written as dy y = (19) (20) (21) (22) 1 1 + λ(cid:20) dk k + 1 1 − θ µ (θ − 1) kθ−2dk µkθ−1 + 1 + λ (cid:21) . The solution of the above equation is given by (20). In terms of K and L we obtain the following production function F (K, L) = ψ(cid:2)(1 + λ) K 1−θLλ(1−θ) + µL(1+λ)(1−θ)(cid:3) and thus the proof is completed. 1 (1+λ)(1−θ) , (23) (cid:3) 7 The equation (20) suggests us the existence of a new relationship, different from that supposed by Liu and Hildebrand or by Lu and Fletcher. Taking the derivative of y with respect to k, into the equation (20), yields ln(y) = ϕω ln (ψ) + ϕ ln (y ′) + ϕθ ln(k), (24) 1 where ϕ = λ(θ−1)+θ and ω = (1 + λ) (θ − 1). This one is a log-linear rela- tionship between output per-capita y, marginal product of capital (the wage of capital) r = y ′ and the capital labor ratio k. Let us now consider the following relationship between the three variables. ln(y) = ln (a) + b ln (r) + c ln(k), a > 0, b > 0, c > 0. (25) The equation (25) may be successively rewritten dk(cid:19)b y = a(cid:18) dy kc ⇒ dy 1 b y = a− 1 b dk k c b , (26) so that integrating one obtains y ="(1 − b)a− 1 c − b b b−c b + k ξ(b − 1) b b b−1 # , b 6= c, b 6= 1 and b 6= 0, (27) where ξ is a constant of integration. Identifying the corresponding equations, we get: θ = c b , λ = c − 1 b − c , ψ = a 1 1−b and µ = ξ(b − 1)a b We can write (27) more symmetrically by setting 1 b . (28) (1 − b)a− 1 b c − b + ξ(b − 1) b = γ b−1 b and (1 − b)a− 1 b c − b 1−b b = δ, γ to obtain b−1 b k y = γhδk 1−c b + (1 − δ)i b b−1 . (29) This production function has the same form as the CES function excepting the term k b multiplied by k b . 1−c b−1 8 Now, via the relations (7) and (8), the marginal rate of substitution and the elasticity of substitution, together with their derivatives can thus be determined, to obtain: R(k) = 1 − c c − b k − ξ(1 − b)a 1 b b c b , k R′(k) = 1 − c c − b − ξc(1 − b)a 1 b b2 c b −1, k σ(k) = b b(1 − c)k − ξ(1 − b)(c − b)a b2(1 − c)k − ξc(1 − b)(c − b)a , 1 b k c b 1 b k c b σ′(k) = ξ(1 − b)(1 − c)(c − b) b(c − b)2a 1 b k c b hb2(1 − c)k − ξc(1 − b)(c − b)a If we take the derivative wrt k into the relation (25), we get σ(k) = b y − ky ′ cy − ky ′ , (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) 1 b k c bi2 . and since σ(k) is a non-negative function of k, it follows that cy − ky ′ > 0 and therefore what we need is c > β, where β is the relative share of capital and this is the only information we can provide concerning the constant c. (Observe that our restriction is exactly the opposite of that obtained by Lu.) From the relation (34) we deduce that the elasticity of substitution will be a constant function (σ = b), if and only if c = 1. We will prove later in our paper that for c = 1, our new production function reduces to the CES function. Concerning the constant b, we suppose that b < 1 (as in the doctoral thesis of Lu), even if we do not have enough arguments to justify this hypothesis. As it is well-known, the marginal rate of substitution is a positive in- creasing function of k. Because R(0) = 0, it follows that this requirement is fulfilled if its derivative is positive, that is c − 1 b − c + ξc(b − 1)a 1 b b2 c b k −1 > 0. (35) Consequently, in order to ensure that R is a positive increasing function for some relevant range of k, we have to impose that ξ < 0 and thus we can distinguish the following three alternatives for the elasticity of substitution. 9 i. If b < c < 1, then σ′ < 0 and therefore the elasticity of substitution is a positive decreasing function and lim k←∞ σ(k) = b c < 1, that is, our production function converges to a CES function. ii. If c < b < 1 then σ′ > 0 and therefore the elasticity of substitution is a positive increasing function and lim k←∞ σ(k) = 1, value that characterizes a Cobb-Douglas function. iii. If c > 1 then σ′ > 0 and therefore the elasticity of substitution is a positive increasing function and lim k←∞ σ(k) = b c < 1, that is, the limit production function is again a CES function. If we express the elasticity of substitution in term of the marginal rate of substitution, then, via the relations (30) and (34) we get: σ = b R cR + (c − 1)k = b c−1 b−c k + ξ(b−1)a b−c k + ξc(b−1)a b(c−1) 1 b b b c b k 1 b c b k . (36) cR+(c−1)k can be interpreted as a correction term ap- In the above relation, plied to the constant b. This correction term has the following important property: R lim k→∞ R cR + (c − 1)k b c < 1 if c > b, 1 if c ≤ b. =  From the above alternatives, we can deduce that the elasticity of substitution is a decreasing function of k (possibly with higher values than one), only in the case when b < c < 1. Otherwise, sigma will be always a function with values less than one. The relations (25), (27), (30) and (32) enable us to establish the following particular cases: 10 i. If b = 0, then from equation (25) we have ln(y) = ln (a) + c ln(k) and the production function given by y = akc, that is a Cobb-Douglas production function. This is equivalently to say that θ = 1 and from equation (21) we get y = Ak 1+λ+µ . The unknown parameters will thus be given by: A = a and λ + µ = 1−c c . 1 ii. If c = 1, then from equations (25) and (27) we obtain the production function given by y =(cid:20)a− 1 b k b−1 b + ξ(b − 1) b b b−1 , (cid:21) that is a CES production function with constant elasticity of substi- tution equal to b. This is equivalently to say that λ = 0 and from equation (19) we have R(k) = µkθ and the production function given 1−θ . The unknown parameters 1 by equation (20) yields y = ψ(cid:2)k1−θ + µ(cid:3) will thus be given by: ψ = a of c, the relation (25) can also be written: 1−b , θ = 1 1 b and µ = ξ(b−1)a b 1 b . For this value ln(y) = ln (a) + b ln (r) + ln(k) ⇔ ln(cid:18) F K(cid:19) = ln (a) + b ln (r) , and thus we obtain another log linear relationship, different to that proposed by Arrow et al., the authors of the CES production function, this time between F K and r. Finally we can claim that our production function is a more general form which includes the Cobb-Douglas function and the CES function as partic- ular cases. 4 Econometric analysis and conclusions The main aim of this section is to estimate the parameters of the new pro- duction function, to compare these results with those of the other production functions and finally to give some conclusions. In order to do this we use 11 the data for the economy of the United States, presented in the paper of Sato and Hoffman and then we estimate the parameters of the new produc- tion function via the equation (25). Proceeding in this way, we can compare our results with the results of Sato (1970) and, David and Klundert (1965), results obtained via the same set of data. The results of the econometric analysis provide the following regression estimate: ln(y) = 0.773454 (0.142659) + 0.934369 (0.046838) ln(r) + 1.191951 (0.065665) ln(k). Substituting these results into the relations (30), (31), (32) and (33) we obtain the marginal rate of substitution, the elasticity of substitution and their derivatives: R = −0.745203k − 0.160728ξk1.275675, R′ = −0.745203 − 0.205039ξk0.275675, σ = 0.934369 0.179353k + 0.038683ξk1.275675 0.167582k + 0.046109ξk1.275675 , −0.000460ξk1.275675 σ′ = [0.167582k + 0.046109ξk1.275675]2 . To ensure that σ is a positive function and R is a positive increasing function for some relevant range of k > 0, accordingly with the consequences presented in the previous section we can chose ξ = −3.79, corresponding to a starting value k0 = 2.0799 (see the paper of Sato and Hoffman). We can observe that the elasticity of substitution σ is an increasing function, whose limit equals 0.784. The trajectories of σ and R are presented in the following graphs. 12 In the next step we estimate the parameters of the production function of Liu and Hildebrand via the of equation (1). The results of the econometric analysis provide the following regression estimate: ln(y) = 0.337698 (0.057614) + 0.942627 (0.022062) ln(ω) + 0.057061 (0.052371) ln(k). As we can observe, the standard error of c = 0.057061 is too high (0.052371) and thus it is rather likely to have c = 0 than to have c 6= 0. Even if we accept the hypothesis that c 6= 0, we can notice that b + c ≈ 1 and therefore one of the necessary restriction of this production function is not respected (the marginal rate of substitution is always equal to zero). Consequently we can conclude that, this production function is not appropriate for the economy of the USA. If c = 0 and b 6= 1 then, according to the properties of this production function, we are in the case of a CES production function. Analyzing the same date as those presented in this paper, Sato (1970), concludes that it is more natural to assume that the economy is operating under a production function with a variable elasticity of substitution rather than with a fixed elasticity, contradicting thus the results obtained by David and Klundert (1965), via the same set of data and assuming a CES produc- tion function. He also claims that: a. The elasticity of factor substitution is most likely less than unity (be- tween 0.5 and 0.7). b. The Cobb-Douglas production function is not appropriate for the ex- planation of the U.S. economy. We can observe that the results are completely different for the two produc- tion functions. The estimates obtained using the new production function seem to correspond much better, both in terms of empirical and theoretical evidence. References [1] Arrow K. J., Chenery H. B., Minhas B. S. and Solow R. M., 1961. Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 43 (3), 225 − 250. 13 [2] Barellia P. and Pessoa S. A., 2003. Inada conditions imply that produc- tion function must be asymptotically Cobb -- Douglas. Economics Letters, 81, 361 − 363. [3] Beckmann M. J., Sato R. and Schupack M., 1972. Alternative Ap- proaches to the Estimation of Production Functions and of Technical Change. International Economic Review, 13 (1), 33 − 52. [4] David P. A. and van de Klundert Th., 1965. Biased Efficiency Growth and Capital-Labor Substitution in the U.S., 1899 − 1960. The American Economic Review, 55 (3), 357 − 394. [5] De La Grandville O., 1997. Curvature and the elasticity of substitution: Straightening it out. Journal of Economics, 66 (1), 23 − 34. [6] Dhrymes P. J., 1965. Some Extensions and Tests for the CES Class of Production Functions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (4), 357 − 366. [7] Kim Y. H., 1992. The Translog Production Function and Variable Re- turns to Scale. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74 (3), 546−552. [8] Klump R. and De La Grandville O., 2000. Economic Growth and the Elasticity of Substitution: Two Theorems and Some Suggestions. The American Economic Review, 90 (1), 282 − 291. [9] Kmenta J., 1967. On estimation of the CES production function. Inter- national Economic Review, 8 (2), 180 − 189. [10] Liu T. C. and Hildebrand H., 1965. Manufacturing Production Functions in the United States 1957. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1965. [11] Lu Yaoji, 1967. Variable elasticity of substitution production functions, technical change and factor shares. Retrospective Theses and Disserta- tions. http : //lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3406 [12] Lu Y. and Fletcher R. F., 1968. A Generalization of the CES Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 50 (4), 449 − 452. [13] Mallick D., 2012. The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: A cross-country investigation. Labour Economics, 19, 682−694. 14 [14] McFadden D., 1963. Constant Elasticity of Substitution Production Functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 30 (2), 73 − 83. [15] Revankar N. S., 1971. A Class of Variable Elasticity of Substitution Production Functions. Econometrica, 39(1), 61 − 71. [16] Sato R. and Hoffman R. F., 1968. Production Functions with Variable Elasticity of Factor Substitution: Some Analysis and Testing. The Re- view of Economics and Statistics, 50 (4), 453 − 460. [17] Sato R., 1980. The Impact of Technical Change on the Holotheticity of Production Functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 47 (4), 767 − 776. [18] Sato R., 1975. The Most General Class of CES Functions. Econometrica, 43 (5/6), 999 − 1003. [19] Sato R., 1970. The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function. International Economic Review, 11 (2), 179 − 208. [20] Sato R., 1967. Linear elasticity of substitution production functions. Metroeconomica, 19 (1), 33 − 41. [21] Uzawa H., (1967). Variable elasticity of substitution production func- tions, technical change and factor shares. PhD Thesis Iowa State Uni- versity. [22] Uzawa H., 1962. Production functions with constant elasticity of substi- tution. Review of Economic Studies, 29 (4), 291 − 299. [23] Wise J. and Yeh Y., 1965. Econometric Techniques for Analyzing Wage and Productivity Differentials with Application to Manufacturing Indus- tries in U.S.A., India and Japan. Paper presented at the 1965 Econo- metric Society Meetings. [24] Zellner A. and Revankar N. S., 1969. Generalized Production Functions. The Review of Economic Studies , 36 (2), 241 − 250. 15
1809.05120	2	1809	2018-10-20T19:43:38	Time preference and information acquisition	[ "econ.TH" ]	I consider the sequential implementation of a target information structure. I characterize the set of decision time distributions induced by all signal processes that satisfy a per-period learning capacity constraint. I find that all decision time distributions have the same expectation, and the maximal and minimal elements by mean-preserving spread order are deterministic distribution and exponential distribution. The result implies that when time preference is risk loving (e.g. standard or hyperbolic discounting), Poisson signal is optimal since it induces the most risky exponential decision time distribution. When time preference is risk neutral (e.g. constant delay cost), all signal processes are equally optimal.	econ.TH	econ	Time preference and information acquisition Weijie Zhong∗ December, 2017 Abstract. I consider the sequential implementation of a target information structure. I characterize the set of decision time distributions induced by all signal processes that satisfy a per-period learning capacity constraint. I find that all decision time distri- butions have the same expectation, and the maximal and minimal elements by mean- preserving spread order are deterministic distribution and exponential distribution. The result implies that when time preference is risk loving (e.g. standard or hyperbolic discounting), Poisson signal is optimal since it induces the most risky exponential de- cision time distribution. When time preference is risk neutral (e.g. constant delay cost), all signal processes are equally optimal. Keywords: dynamic information acquisition, rational inattention, time preference JEL: D81 D83 1 Introduction Consider a decision maker (DM) who is making a one-shot choice of action. The payoff of each action depends on an unknown state of the world. The DM can design a sequence of signal structures as her information source subject to a flow informative- ness constraint. The informativeness of a signal structure is measured by a posterior separable measure. The DM is impatient and discounts future payoffs. Here I want to study a simple question: fix a target information structure, what is the optimal learn- ing dynamics that implements this target information structure? In Example 1, I solve this problem in a very simple setup. In the example, I con- sider three simple dynamic signal structures: pure accumulation of information before decision making, learning from a decisive signal arriving according to a Poisson pro- cess and learning from observing a Gaussian signal. The example suggests that differ- ent dynamic signal structures mainly differ in the induced decision time distribution. Since the form of discounting function prescribes the risk attitude on the time dimen- sion, the discounting function (or time preference) should be a key factor determining the optimal dynamic signal structure. Example 1. Consider a simple example with binary states x " t0, 1u. Prior belief is µ " 0.5. Suppose the target information structure is full revelation (induces belief 0 or 1 each with 0.5 probability). I consider a model in continuous time. Let Hpµq " 1´ 4pµ´ 0.5q2, the flow information measure of belief process µt is Er´ d uncertainty reduction speed, introduced in Zhong (2017)). Assume flow cost constraint Fts (the dt Hpµtq ∗Columbia University, Email: [email protected] 1 c " 1. DM has exponential discount function e´t. I normalize expected decision utility from optimal action associated with full learning to be 1. The DM has three alternative learning strategies: 1. Pure accumulation: the DM uses up all resources pushing her posterior beliefs to- wards boundary. More precisely, at each prior µ, the strategy seeks posterior ν " 1 ´ µ with arrival probability p " 1. The DM makes decision once her pos- terior arrives at 0 or 1. By standard property of Poisson process, the DM's posterior belief drifts towards 1 with speed 4p2µ´1q. Therefore, the dynamics of belief satisfies ODE: 4p1´2µq2 1 1 # 1 9µ " 4p2µ´1q µp0q " 0.5 It is easy to solve for µptq " 1`? . As a result the DM's decision time is deterministic at t " µ´1p1q " 1. The expected utility from the pure accumulation strategy is VA " e´1 « 0.368. 2 t 2. Gaussian learning: the DM observes a Gaussian signal, whose drift is the true state and variance is a control variable. By standard property of Gaussian learning, the DM's posterior belief follows a Brownian motion with zero drift. The flow variance of posterior belief process satisfies information cost constraint Er´ d 2 σ2H2pµqdt ď cdt. Therefore, we can solve for σ2 " 1 ´ 1 characterized by the HJB: 4. Then value function is Fts " dt Hpµtq Vpµq " 1 8 V2pµq with boundary condition Vp0q " Vp1q " 1. There is an analytical solution to the ODE: ? ? 2 ` e4 Vpµq " e2 ? 1 ` e2 2 ùñ VG " Vp0.5q « 0.459 2x ? e´2 2x Fts " λpHpµtq´ 1 3. Poisson learning: the DM learns states perfectly with a Poisson rate λ. If no in- formation arrives, her belief stays at prior. By flow informativeness constraint Er´ d 2 Hp0qq ď cdt ùñ λ " 1. The value function is characterized by the HJB: 2 Hp1q´ 1 dt Hpµtq ρVP " λp1 ´ VPq ùñ VP " 0.5 1This can be calculated using cost of Poisson signals Er´dHpµqs " pHpµq ´ Hpνqpdt ` H1pµqpν ´ µqqpdt ď cdt 2 Clearly: VP ą VG ą VA Now we introduce the intuition why the values are ordered in this way. First, all of the three strategies induce the same expected decision time 1. This is due to the linearity of posterior separable information measure in compound experiments. The measure of a signal structure that fully reveals state at prior 0.5 is exactly 1, and it must equal the expected sum of all learning costs. Since in each continuing unit of time flow cost 1 is spent, expected learning time must be 1. Therefore, what determines expected decision utility is the dispersion of decision time distribution. Since discount function e´t is a strictly convex function, a learning strategy that creates the most dispersed decision time attains the highest expected utility. Now let us study the decision time distribution induced by the three strategies: 1. Pure accumulation: t " 1 with probability 1. The decision time is deterministic. 2. Gaussian learning: With Gaussian learning, to characterize the decision time, it is equivalent to characterize the first passage time of a standard Brownian motion with two absorbing barriers: * " 1 2 T " min t Bt " 0 or 1 ` 1 2 Distribution of T can be solved by solving heat equation with two-sided boundary solution at x " 0, 1. There is no analytical solution (solution is only characterized by series). Here I numerically simulate this process: Figure 1: Belief distribution of Gaussian learning Figure 1 depicts the evolution of distribution over posteriors over time. We can see that at any cross-section, the distribution over posteriors is a Normal distribution censored at two absorbing barriers 2. The normal part is becoming flatter over time because learning leads to mean preserving spread of posterior beliefs. 2the distribution has point mass at 0, 1, represented by straight lines in figure. The relative height represents probability mass. But the point mass part and Normal part doesn't share same scale. 3 3. Poisson learning: As is calculated, the Poisson signal has a fixed arrival frequency λ " 1. The stopping time distribution can be calculated easily: Fptq " 1 ´ e´t Evolution of posterior beliefs is shown in Figure 2: Figure 2: Belief distribution of Poisson learning Figure 2 depicts the evolution of distribution over posteriors over time. At any cross-section, distribution over posterior has three mass points at prior and two tar- get posteriors. The mass on prior is decreasing over time (following an exponential distribution) and the mass on posteriors is increasing over time. Obviously, pure accumulation is always the worst since it has deterministic deci- sion time. By comparing Figures 1 and 2, one can easily see the difference between Gaussian learning and Poisson learning: Gaussian learning accumulates some infor- mation that induces intermediate beliefs over time, while Poisson learning uses up all resources to draw conclusive signals. It seems the Poisson learning induces higher decision probability in the beginning and Gaussian learning induces higher decision probability later on (when prior is more dispersed). Therefore, Poisson learning has more dispersed decision time. We can verify this by plotting PDFs and integral of CDFs: Figure 3: PDFs Figure 4: Integral of CDFs 4 0.51.01.52.02.53.0t0.20.40.60.81.0pdf0.51.01.52.02.53.0t0.51.01.52.0∫CDFIn figure Figures 3 and 4, the black curves represent Poisson learning, the red curves represent Gaussian learning and the dashed lines represent pure accumula- tion. It is not hard to see from Figure 4 that decision time of Poisson learning is in fact a mean-preserving spread of that of Gaussian learning. So Poisson learning dom- inates Gaussian learning for not only exponential discounting, but also any convex discounting function. In Example 1, I compare three kinds of dynamic learning strategies. These three strategies are chosen to be representative. First, these three strategies are simple heuris- tics that are very tractable. Second, these three strategies are also representative for three kinds of learning frameworks widely used in literature: • Pure accumulation has a flavor of rational inattention models. Like in Matejka & McKay (2014), decision is made once and there is no dynamics. Even in dynamic rational inattention model like Steiner et al. (2017), information is acquired in one period, and there is no smooth of information. In this example, (decisive) learning has neither time dispersion nor cross-sectional dispersion with pure ac- cumulation. • Gaussian learning itself is well studied in literature, for example Moscarini & Smith (2001), H´ebert & Woodford (2016). On the other hand, Gaussian learn- ing is one kind of symmetric drift-diffusion model (Ratcliff & McKoon (2008)). Gaussian learning captures the idea of gradual learning both over time and over beliefs. • Poisson learning relates to Wald's problem (Wald (1947), Che & Mierendorff (2016)). Poisson bandit is used as a building block for strategic experimentation models (see a survey by Horner & Skrzypacz (2016)). My example considers a simplest stationary Poisson stopping strategy that stochastically reveals the true state. Poisson learning is only gradual over time, but is lump sum in belief space. Example 1 suggests a key trade-off to be studied: gradual accumulation of infor- mation v.s. seeking decisive evidence. I want to learn how choice between gradual accumulation and decisive evidence seeking determines decision time distribution. In Section 2, I develop an information acquisition problem that imposes no restriction on the specific form of information a decision maker can acquire. The DM can choose an arbitrary random process as signals, and she observes signal realizations as her infor- mation. There are two constraints on the signal process. First, flow informativeness of the process is bounded. Second, the signal distribution conditional on stopping is fixed. If the DM chooses to learn gradually, then she is able to accumulate sufficient information before making any decision. After accumulating information, she can run the target experiment successfully with very high probability and achieves close to riskless decision time. On the contrary, if the DM chooses to only seek decisive sig- nals, then they arrive only with low probabilities. So the corresponding decision time is more risky. 5 The main finding of this paper is that among all decision time distributions in- duced by feasible and exhaustive3 learning strategies, the most dispersed decision time distribution is induced by decisive Poisson learning -- only decisive signals arrive as Poisson process. Meanwhile, the least dispersed time distribution is induced by pure accumulation, as I already show in Example 1. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 setups a general discrete time infor- mation acquisition framework. Section 3 proves the main theorem. Section 4 extends the result to a continuous time model. Section 6 concludes. 2 Setup of model ř8 The model is in discrete time. Consider a decision maker who has a discount func- τ"t ρτ " 0. There tion ρt decreasing and convex (both weakly) in time t. is a finite state space X and action space A. Prior belief of the unknown payoff- relevant state is µ P ∆pXq. The DM's goal is to implement a signal structure that induces distribution π P ∆2pXq over posterior beliefs4. By implementing a target sig- nal structure, I mean conditional on stopping, the signal structure in current period ř must be a sufficient statistics for the target information structure. The informative- ness of signal structure is measured by a posterior separable function Ippi, νiµq " pipHpµq ´ Hpνiqq. In each period, the DM can acquire information for no more than limtÑ8 " ‰ iµtq (1) c unit, i.e. E Ippt i, νt ď c. The optimization problem is: ErρT upA,Xqs $'&'%I pSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq ď c X Ñ St Ñ A conditional on T " t X Ñ St Ñ 1T ět sup St,T s.t. where T P ∆N, t P N. St´1 is defined as summary of past information pS1, . . . ,St´1q. S0 " c0 is assumed to be degenerate. The objective function in Equation (1) is straight forward. The first constraint is the flow information cost constraint. The second con- straint is the target information structure constraint. The remaining constraint is nat- ural information process constraint. Remark. This model is restrictive in design of information in the following sense: At any instant in time, conditional on stop, the information acquired must be sufficient for a time invariant A. Other than this restriction, DM can freely choose her learning dynamics. This model does not necessarily cover Gaussian learning in general, but it does in symmetric cases (i.e. target posterior distribution and H are symmetric around prior µ). I restrict learning dynamics in this way to abstract away from the fact that the opti- mal target information structure itself is changing over time, which creates time vary- ing incentive for search direction, search precision and search intensity (highlighted in Zhong (2017)). In the current paper, I want to focus on the trade-off between gradual information accumulation and decision evidence seeking. 3A feasible strategy is exhaustive if it is not leaving any capacity unused or acquiring unrelated information. 4I equivalent represent state and signal realization as random variables pX ,Aq. 6 I assume that the DM follows suggestion of signal structure A in choosing action. This is WLOG since given any signal structure, the induced optimal action itself forms a Blackwell less informative signal structure. Therefore, the original learning strategy is still statistically sufficient for the direct signal structure. So if we take the optimiza- tion of A also into account, it is WLOG to assume A is a direct signal. Then the optimal implementation of A still follows solution to our problem. The optimization of A is studied in Section 5.1. 3 Solution 3.1 Relaxed problem Let ¯I " IpA;Xq and V " ErupA;Xqs. Consider a relaxed problem which only tracks average accumulated information measure I rather than the whole signal pro- cess conditional on all histories: (2) t"1 ρtp1 ´ Pt´1qptV 8ÿ $'&'%p ¯I ´ Itqpt ` pIt`1 ´ Itqp1 ´ ptq ď c Pt " Pt´1 ` p1 ´ Pt´1qpt P0 " 0, I1 " 0 sup pt s.t. where pt P r0, 1s and It ě 0. 1 ´ Pt´1 is the surviving probability at period t, pt is the conditional stop probability. It is the information measure of the whole path of non-stopping signals up to period t. The relaxed problem Equation (2) captures a key feature of posterior separable in- formation measure: It is accumulated linearly overtime and the information measure required to implement S is exactly the remaining information measure ¯I ´ It. It is more relaxed than Equation (1) in the following sense: in Equation (1), the flow informative- ness constraint is imposed on all histories of St´1 and 1T ďt. However, in Equation (2), the first constraint is imposed only on average. pt can be interpreted as the expected stopping probability and It's as the expected accumulated informativeness. Lemma 1. Value from solving Equation (1) is no larger than value from solving Equation (2) Lemma 1 verifies the previous intuition. Now I first focus on solving Equation (2), to provide some clue for solving the original problem Equation (1). Theorem 1. pt " c ¯I solves Equation (2). ´ 1 ´ c ¯I ¯t´1 c ř8 no information should ever be accumulated. Theorem 1 states that the relaxed problem Equation (2) has a simple solution: It " 0 and the optimal value equals t"0 ρt I prove Theorem 1 by approximating the convex discount function ρt with finite summation of linear ones. For each linear discount function, I prove by backward induction that choosing It " 0 is optimal. ¯I V. 7 3.2 Optimal learning dynamics By Lemma 1 and Theorem 1, to solve Equation (1), it is sufficient to show that ´ 8ÿ ρt t"1 ¯t´1 c ¯I 1 ´ c ¯I V (3) is attainable by feasible strategy in Equation (1). Consider the following experimen- tation strategy, A is observed with probability c ¯I in each period. If A is successfully observed, the corresponding action is taken. If not, go to the next period and follow the same strategy. Formally, St and T are defined as follows. Let s0, c0 R A be two distinct degenerate signals. $''&''%s0 with probability 1 if St´1 P A Ť ¯I if St´1 " c0 A with probability c c0 with probability 1 ´ c ¯I if St´1 " c0 ts0u St " T "t if St P A (4) (5) Then it is not hard to verify that: • Objective function: 8ÿ ErρT upA, Xqs 8ÿ 8ÿ ρtPpSt P AqErupA,Xqs t´1ź ´ t"1 t"1 ¯t c ρt τ"0 1 ´ c ¯I V ¯I ρt t"1 " " " PpSτ " c0Sτ´1 " c0qPpSt P ASt´1 " c0qErupA,Xqs • Capacity constraint: IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq "1St´1"c0 IpSt;Xtc0u , 1q ` 1St´1‰c0 Ips0;XSt´1, 0q "1St´1"c0 pPpSt P AqIpA;Xq ` PpSt " c0qIpc0;Xqq ` 1St´1‰c0 0 "1St´1"c0 c ¯I ¯I ď c • Decision time distribution: Pt " PpT ď tq " 1 ´ ¯t ´ 1 ´ c ¯I I show that Equation (4) implements expected utility level Equation (3), hence solves Equation (1). It is easy to see that Equation (4) induces expected decision time ¯I c. By 8 Lemma 2, ¯I c is the lower bound of expected decision time for all feasible strategies. In fact, the proof of Lemma 2 suggests that ErT s ą ¯I c only when there is some waste of information: either capacity constraint c is not fully used, or St contains strictly more information than A conditional on taking action. Lemma 2. Let pSt,T q be information acquisition strategy satisfying constraints in Equa- tion (1), then ErT s ě ¯I c. I call an information acquisition strategy exhaustive if corresponding ErT s " ¯I c. The decision time distribution Pt induced by strategy Equation (4) is a exponential distribution with parameter c ¯I . Equation (4) being the optimal strategy, independent of choice of ρt implies that @ρt, @ information acquisition strategy prSt,rT q: ErρrT upA;Xqs ď ErρT upA;Xqs ùñ ErρrT s ď ErρT s Since ρt ranges over all positive decreasing convex functions, Pt as distribution over time is second order stochastically dominated. Summarizing the analysis above, I get Theorem 2. Theorem 2. Equation (4) solves Equation (1). The decision time distribution of any feasible and exhaustive information acquisition strategy second order stochastically dominates Pt. 3.3 Gradual learning v.s. decisive evidence My analysis illustrates the gradual learning v.s. decisive evidence trade-off in the flexible learning environment. The trade-off is: the speed of future learning depends on how much information the DM has already possessed. Accumulating more in- formation today speeds up future learning. So the DM is choosing between naively learning just for today or learning for the future. If all resources are invested in seeking decisive evidence, then signal arrives at a constant low probability, and the decision time distribution is dispersed. If some resources are invested in information accumu- lation, then learning will accelerate, at a cost of lower (or even zero) arrival rate of decisive signals in the early stage. As a result the decision time is less dispersed. Surprisingly, when the decision maker has convex discounting function, decisive evidence seeking is optimal. The intuition behind this result is natural. Convex dis- counting function means that the decision maker is risk loving towards decision time. Seeking decisive evidence is the riskiest learning strategy one can take: it payoff quickly with high probability, but if it fails, learning is very slow in future. In practice, evi- dence seeking is a very natural learning strategies. A researcher tends to form a hy- pothesis, then seeks evidence either confirms or contradicts the hypothesis. Usually there is a clear target of what to prove (the hypothesis), and what kind of signals (data from experiments) proves/contradicts the hypothesis. Running the research protocol itself is usually more mechanical than the designing stage. What is common in natural science is that the principal investigator designs the whole research plan. Then all ex- periments, data collections and computations are run by doctoral students. PI usually 9 diversifies over dozens of projects, so he can enjoy the expected payoff from this risky project design. Two elements in my framework are key to this result. First is the flexibility in de- sign of signal process. In contrast to my framework, if one consider a dynamic infor- mation acquisition problem with highly parametrized information process, then other kind of trade-offs tied to the parametrization constraints might have first order effects. For example, if one only allows Poisson learning or Gaussian learning, then the trade- off of gradual learning and decisive evidence is directly assumed away. As a result the choice among signal types (Che & Mierendorff (2016),Liang et al. (2017)) or the trade- off between intensity and information cost (Moscarini & Smith (2001)) becomes first order important. If one only allows DM to choose between to learn or not to learn in each period, then the trade-off between exploration and exploitation becomes first or- der. Meanwhile, in my framework, the DM can freely design the optimal signal type, and the corresponding decision time. So the aforementioned trade-offs actually do not exist, the trade-off between gradual learning and decisive evidence becomes central to the analysis. Second is the posterior separability assumption on information measure. Posterior separability is equivalent to the linear additivity of compound signal structures (see the discussion in Section 7.1 of Zhong (2017)). This assumption restricts the relative price between gradual learning and evidence seeking. Any amount of informativeness invested today to accumulate information transfers one-to-one to the amount of reduc- tion of information cost tomorrow. Lemma 2 shows that the expected decision time is identical for all feasible and exhaustive learning strategy. As a result the trade-off be- tween gradual learning and decisive learning translates to choice of dispersion of de- cision time distribution. If one assumes either sub-additivity or super-additivity in in- formativeness measure, then choosing different learning strategies might also change the expected decision time, which makes my key trade-off entangled with other ef- fects. 4 Continuous time In this section, I study a continuous time version of Equation (1). Let ρt : R` Ñ R` be decreasing, convex and integrable discounting function. Let Fpµq " supa Eµrupa, xqs. Consider stochastic control problem: sup xµty,T s.t. ErρτEπrFpµqss $''&''%Erµt`sµts " µt Ft " ´E dt Hpµtq µ0 " µ, µt d ı τ"t „ π ď cdt (6) where τ has continuous cdf and is measurable to µt. The objective function of Equa- tion (6) is the same as that of Equation (1). In the stochastic control problem, the decision maker chooses the optimal posterior belief process xµty and stopping time τ, subject to 1) stopping time measurable to belief process. 2) belief process is a martin- 10 gale. 3) flow increase in informativeness measure is bounded by c. 4) conditional on stopping time, µt has distribution π. Equation (6) is a continuous time extension of Equation (1). However, I haven't not formally specify how a stochastic process of posterior beliefs can be induced by a stochastic information acquisition strategy. Equation (6) is constructed by taking analog of Equation (1). Let V " EπrFpµqs. Then Lemma 3. Value from solving Equation (6) is no larger than value from solving Equation (7). ż 8 # 0 V " sup pt s.t. ρt p1 ´ Ptq ptVdt I0 " 0, It ě 0, P0 " 0, 9Pt " p1 ´ Ptqpt 9It ď c ´ ptp ¯I ´ Itq where pt is positive integrable function. Theorem 3. pt " c ¯I solves Equation (7). Lemma 3 and Theorem 3 are exactly the continuous time analog of Lemma 1 and The- ş8 orem 1. Lemma 3 states that Equation (7) is a relaxed problem of Equation (2). Theo- rem 3 characterizes the solution of Equation (7): no information should ever be accu- 0 ρte´ c mulated. It " 0 and the optimal value equals I Vdt. Theorem 3 is proved by I t c discreizing the continuous time problem and invoking the result of Theorem 1. 4.1 Implementation By Lemma 3 and Theorem 3, to solve Equation (6), it is sufficient to show that: can be attained in Equation (6). Consider the following information acquisition strat- egy. Let ν be a random variable with distribution π and define: (7) (8) ż 8 0 ρte´ c ¯I tdt V c I # dµt " pν ´ µtq dNt τ " t if dNt=1 where Nt a standard Poisson counting processes with parameter c ¯I and independent to ν. xµty is by definition a stationary compound Poisson process. The jump happens when the Poisson signal arrives and belief jumps to posteriors according to distribu- tion π. Once the jump occurs, decision is made immediately. It is easy to verify: • Martingale property: Each dNt ´ c ¯I dt is martingale. Erdµtµts "Erpν ´ µtq dNts " "Eπ rErpν ´ µq dNtνss dNt ´ c "Eπ ¯I "0 " pν ´ µq E ıı dt ` Eπ " pν ´ µq c ¯I ı dt therefore, µt is a martingale. Second equality is law of iterated expectation. Third equality is by martingale assumption of ν and dNt ´ c ¯I dt being martingale. 11 • Capacity constraint: If dNt ě 1, then Er´dHpµtqµts " 0 ď c. If dNt ă 1, then by Ito formula for jump process: dHpµtq "pHpνq ´ Hpµqq dNt ùñ Er´dHpµtqµts "Eπ rErpHpµtq ´ Hpνqq dNtνss ı pHpµtq ´ Hpνqqdt " "Eπ "cdt c ¯I Second equality is law of iterated expectation. Third equality is martingale prop- erty of dNt ´ c ¯I dt. • Decision time distribution: Pt " 1 ´ e´ c ¯I t Therefore, Equation (8) implements utility level ş8 c ¯I e´ c ¯I tVdt. 0 ρt Lemma 4. Let pµt,T q be information acquisition strategy satisfying constraints in Equa- tion (6), then ErT s ě ¯I c. As in the discrete case, I call an information acquisition strategy exhaustive if the corre- sponding ErT s " ¯I c. Since Equation (8) is optimal independent of choice of convex ρt, previous analysis implies Theorem 4. Theorem 4. Equation (8) solves Equation (6). The decision time distribution of any feasible and exhaustive information acquisition strategy second order stochastically dominates Pt. 5 Discussion 5.1 Optimal target signal structure In this section, I solve for the optimal target signal structure in decision problem Equation (6). Assume that ρt is differentiable. By Theorem 4, the optimization problem can be written as: ´ ρte c Hpµq´EπrHpνqs tdt c EπrFpνqs Hpµq ´ EπrHpνqs (9) ż 8 0 sup πP∆2pXq ş8 s.t. Eπrνs " µ dt ´ c cV2 Define fpV1, V2q " Hpµq´V1 . Then it is not hard to verify that fpV1, V2q is differentiable5 in V1, V2. Apply Theorem 2 of Zhong (2018), a necessary condition for π solving Equation (9) is: Hpµq´V1 t 0 ρte » -- -- Fpνq ` ş8 ş8 0 p´ 9ρtq e ´ π P arg max πP∆2pXq Eπrνs"µ Eπ c Hpµq´EπrHpνqs t EπrFpνqs Hpµq´EπrHpνqstdt ´ c Hpµq´EπrHpνqs t dt Hpνq fiffifl 5Differentiabiliy can be shown by definition, noticing that e Hpµq´V1 t t is absolutely integrable. 0 ρte ´ c 12 Notice that the objective function is the expectation of the linear combination of two belief dependent functions. If we define: ş8 ş8 0 p´ 9ρtq e 0 ρte t ´ c Hpµq´x t ´ c Hpµq´x tdt Hpµq´xdt gpxq " Then by the standard argument in Bayesian persuasion, π can by characterized by concavifying the gross value function F ` pgpEπrHpνqsq EπrFpνqsq H. Moreover, by Theorem 1 of Zhong (2018), there exists π with support size 2X solving Equation (9). So I get the following characterization: Proposition 1. There exists π solving Equation (9) and supppπq ď 2X. Let λ " gpEπrHpνqsq EπrFpνqs, any such π satisfies: π P arg max πP∆2pXq Eπrνs"µ EπrFpνq ` λ Hpνqs Suppose the discounting function is a standard exponential function: ρt " e´ρd, then gpxq " Vpµq " ż 8 0 ρ c`ρpHpµq´xq. Notice that objective function: c EπrFpνqs Hpµq ´ EπrHpνqsdt " Hpµq´EπrHpνqs ρ` ´ e c t Therefore, optimality condition becomes: π P arg max πP∆2pXq Eπrνs"µ Eπ Fpνq ` ρ c VpµqHpνq " c EπrFpνqs c ` ρpHpµq ´ EπrHpνqsq ı (10) Equation (10) is very similar to optimality condition derived in Zhong (2017), where optimal posterior is solved from concavifying Vpq ` ρ c VpµqHpq. The problem solved in Zhong (2017) is the continuous time limit of Equation (1) without constraint on con- c Vpµq is stant target signal structure and exponential discounting. In both problems, ρ adjusting the concavity of gross value function. Therefore, higher continuation value corresponds to more concave gross value function and less informative signal struc- ture. This suggests that the monotonicity in precision-frequency trade-off is extended to our model as well. In Zhong (2017), the trade-off is illustrated as decrease in preci- sion of target information structure at each decision time. In the current paper, target information structure is forced to be constant over time. However, if I endogenize tar- get information structure, then at more extreme prior beliefs associated with higher decision value, less informative target information structure is optimal (and corre- sponding expected waiting time is shorter). 6 Conclusion In this paper, I characterize the decision time distributions that can be induced by a dynamic information acquisition strategy, and study how time preference deter- mines the optimal form of learning dynamics. No restriction is placed on the form of 13 information acquisition strategy, except for a fixed target signal structure and a flow informativeness constraint.I find that all decision time distributions have the same ex- pectation, and the maximal and minimal elements by mean-preserving spread order are deterministic distribution and exponential distribution. The result implies that when time preference is risk loving (e.g. standard or hyperbolic discounting), Poisson signal is optimal since it induces the most risky exponential decision time distribution. When time preference is risk neutral (e.g. constant delay cost), all signal processes are equally optimal. 14 References Che, Y.-K. & Mierendorff, K. (2016). Optimal sequential decision with limited attention. H´ebert, B. & Woodford, M. (2016). Rational inattention with sequential information sampling. Horner, J. & Skrzypacz, A. (2016). Learning, experimentation and information design. Technical report, Working Paper. Liang, A., Mu, X., & Syrgkanis, V. (2017). Optimal learning from multiple information sources. Matejka, F. & McKay, A. (2014). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 272 -- 298. Moscarini, G. & Smith, L. (2001). The optimal level of experimentation. Econometrica, 69(6), 1629 -- 1644. Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural computation, 20(4), 873 -- 922. Steiner, J., Stewart, C., & Matejka, F. (2017). Rational inattention dynamics: Inertia and delay in decision-making. Econometrica, 85(2), 521 -- 553. Wald, A. (1947). Foundations of a general theory of sequential decision functions. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, (pp. 279 -- 313). Zhong, W. (2017). Optimal dynamic information acquisition. unpublished manuscript. Zhong, W. (2018). Information Design Possibility Set. ArXiv e-prints. 15 A Omitted proofs A.1 Proof for Lemma 1 Proof. Step 1. Value from solving Equation (1) is no larger than value from solving Equation (11): (11) sup St,T s.t. $'&'%E " ErρT upA,Xqs ď c X Ñ St Ñ A conditional on T " t X Ñ St Ñ 1T ět I pSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq T ě t ‰ Equation (11) is more relaxed than Equation (1) in the first constraint. In Equation (1), the flow cost constraint is imposed on each prior induced by previous information and decision choice. Equation (11) only requires the average cost conditional on not having stopped yet being bounded by c: " IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq ď c I pSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq T ě t ‰ ùñ E ď ErcT ě ts " c Therefore, any feasible strategy for Equation (1) is feasible for Equation (11). So Equa- tion (11) is a more relaxed problem than Equation (1). @ pSt,T q satisfying constraints in Equation (11), define: Step 2. Value from solving Equation (11) is no larger than value from solving Equation (2). $'&'%It " I pSt´1;XT ě tq pt " PpT " tT ě tq Pt " PpT ď tq Want to show that pIt, ptq is feasible and implements same utility in Equation (2) as pSt,T q in Equation (11). First, consider the objective function: Second, consider feasibility constraint: 8ÿ ErρT upA;Xqs 8ÿ 8ÿ t"0 t"0 " " " PpT " tqρtErupA;XqT " ts PpT " tT ě tqPpT ě tqρtV t"0 ρtp1 ´ Pt´1qptV ‰ T ě t I pSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq " c ěE "PpT " tT ě tqErIpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětqT " ts `PpT ą tT ě tqErIpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětqT ą tqs "pt pIpSt, 1T ět;XT " tq ´ IpSt´1, 1T ět;XT " tqq `p1 ´ ptqpIpSt, 1T ět;XT ą tq ´ IpSt´1, 1T ět;XT ą tqq 16 "ptIpSt;XT " tq ` p1 ´ ptqIpSt;XT ą tq ´pptIpSt´1, 1T ět;XT " tq ` p1 ´ ptqIpSt´1, 1T ět;XT ą tqq ěptIpA;Xq ` p1 ´ ptqIt`1 ´ IpSt´1, 1T ět;XT ě tq "pt ¯I ` p1 ´ ptqIt`1 ´ It First inequality is feasibility constraint. Fist equality is law of iterated expectation. Second equality is chain rule from posterior separability. Third equality is rewriting terms. Noticing that condition on T " t ` 1, 1T ďt is degenerate. Second inequality is from information pro- cessing inequality and applying chain rule again. Last equality is by definition. It is easy to verify by law of total probability that: Then we verify initial conditions:# Pt "PpT ď tq " PpT " tq ` PpT ď t ´ 1q "PpT ě tqPpT " tT ě tq ` PpT ď t ´ 1q "p1 ´ Pt´1qpt ` Pt´1 I1 " IpS0;XT ě 1q " 0 P0 " PpT ď 0q " 0 ( (cid:32) 0, T´t Tÿ $'&'%p ¯I ´ Iτqpτ ` pIτ`1 ´ Iτqp1 ´ pτq ď c Pτ " Pτ´1 ` p1 ´ Pτ´1qpτ Pt´1 " 0, It " I p1 ´ Pτ´1qpτV T ´ τ T τ"t pτ s.t. VtpIq " sup A.2 Proof of Theorem 1 Proof. First, assume ρt " max . We show that the statement in Theorem 1 is correct with assumed ρt. Since ρt " 0 when t ě T, Equation (2) is finite horizon. So we can apply backward induction. Define: T Q.E.D. (12) Then Vt solves functional equation: $'''&'''% VtpIq " sup T ´ t T p pV ` p1 ´ pqVt`1pI1q s.t. p ¯I ´ Iqp ` pI1 ´ Iqp1 ´ pq ď c ¯ Tÿ ´ 1 ´ c ¯I I conjecture that for I ě 0: τ´t´1 τ"t`1 V ` V c ¯I T ´ τ T c ` I ¯I V 1 ´ c ` I ¯I T ´ t T T ´ t T rVtpIq " solves Equation (12). This is clearly true for t " T ´ 1. Since when t " T ´ 1, Vt`1 " 0 so there is no utility gain from accumulating I. Now we prove the conjecture by backward induction on t. Suppose the conjecture is true for t. Consider solving Vt´1 from Equation (12). c ` I ¯I c ` I ¯I ă 1 ě 1 when when (13) 17 • Case 1: ¯I ď c ` I. Then choosing p " 1 gives utility T´τ T V immediately, thus optimal and VtpIq " T´t T V " rVtpIq. • Case 1: ¯I ą c ` I. Consider the one-step optimization problem choosing I1: VtpIq " sup I1ě0 T ´ t T ¯I ´ I1 V ` ¯I ´ I ´ c c ` I ´ I1 ¯I ´ I1 When I1 ď ¯I ´ c, the objective function is: rVt`1pI1q T ´ t T T ´ t ´ 1 V T ¯I ´ I1 V ` ¯I ´ I ´ c c ` I ´ I1 ¯I ´ I1 ¯I ´ I ´ c p ¯I ´ I1q2 V ď 0 1 ´ c ` I1 ¯I T ´ t ´ 1 V ` Tÿ τ"t`2 ¸ τ´t´2 ¯ ´ 1 ´ c ¯I T ´ τ T V c ¯I ùñ FOC : ´ When I1 ą ¯I ´ c, the objective function is: T ´ t c ` I1 ¯I T ùñ FOC : ´ 1 T c ` I ´ I1 ¯I ´ I1 V ` ¯I ´ I ´ c ¯T´t´1 ¯I ´ I ´ c ´ ¯I ´ I1 1 ´ c Tp ¯I ´ I1q2 V ă 0 ¯I Tÿ T ´ t ´ 1 V ` T 1 ´ c ` I ¯I 1 ´ c ` I ¯I V ` τ"t`1 c ` I ¯I c ` I ¯I T VtpIq " T ´ t " T ´ t "rVtpIq T To sum up, decreasing I1 is always utility improving. So optimal I1 " 0 and ¸ optimal solution of Equation (12) is ´ ¯ ´ ¯ Tÿ T ´ τ T V c ¯I 1 ´ c ¯I τ´t´2 1 ´ c ¯ ¯I τ´t´1 c ¯I V c ¯I V ` ´ 1 ´ c ¯I τ"t`2 T T ´ τ T T ( , Equation (2) ¯I is still optimal τět ρτ " 0, so @ε there exists T s.t (cid:32) Therefore, rVtpIq solves Equation (12). So with ρt defined by max ¯I ) and optimal utility is rV1p0q. is solved by strategy It " 0 (i.e. pt " c ř 0, T´t ř Now, consider a general convex ρt. We want to show that pt " c strategy for Equation (2). By definition limtÑ8 τ " maxtρT ` pτ ´ TqpρT ´ ρT´1q, 0u. Define pρT těT ρt ă ε. Pick T to be an even number. Now define ρt τ recursively: τ is convex in τ andpρT pρT τ " 0 otherwise. It is not hard to verify thatpρT τ " ρτ ´ ρT • ρT ( (cid:32)pρT . DefinepρT´2 τ "pρT T´2 ` pτ ´ T ` 2qppρT T´2 ´pρT T ´ 1. is convex in τ andpρT´2 not hard to verify thatpρT´2 T´3q, 0 τ " max τ ´ ρT´2 • ρT´2 τ " 0 @τ ě T ´ 3. ¯ ) ´pρT´2k`2 !pρT´2k`2 . Define pρT´2k T´2k ´pρT´2k`2 pρT´2k`2 T´2k ` pτ ´ T ` 2kq " max ´ ρT´2k • • ρT´2k τ when τ ď T and τ " 0 @τ ě T´2k´1 . It is " , 0 τ τ τ . τ τ τ 18 @p1 t satisfying constraints in Equation (2) and corresponding P1 t: ρtp1 ´ P1 t´1qp1 tV ρt ´ rT{2sÿ ‚‚p1 ´ P1 t´1qp1 tV ρT´2k t ` k"1 ρT´2k t p1 ´ P1 t´1qp1 ρT´2k t k"1 tV ` εV t"1 t"1 8ÿ rT{2sÿ 8ÿ rT{2sÿ 8ÿ rT{2sÿ 8ÿ 8ÿ k"1 k"1 t"1 t"1 " ă ď ď First inequality is from part. Last inequality is from p1 ´ Pt´1qptV ` εV t ρT´2k t"1 ρtp1 ´ Pt´1qptV ` εV ř 8ÿ ř těT ρt ă ε. Second inequality is from optimality of pt in last těT ρt ě 0. Therefore, by taking ε Ñ 0, we showed that: t´1qp1 ρtp1 ´ Pt´1qptV tV ď ρtp1 ´ P1 8ÿ t"1 t"1 Q.E.D. # St s0 A.3 Proof of Lemma 2 conditional on T ě t conditional on T ă t where equality is defined as signal distribution conditional on X and T being identical. It is Proof. First of all, redefine rSt s.t.rSt " not hard to verify that rSt,T still satisfies constraints in Equation (1): • If T ă t, IprSt;XrSt´1, 1T ětq " 0 since rSt is degenerate. If T ě t, then T ě t ´ 1 so IprSt;XrSt´1, 1T ětq " IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq ď c. • Conditional on T " t, rSt " St so X Ñ rSt Ñ A. • If rSt " s0, then T ă t for sure, so 1T ět is independent to X . If rSt ‰ s0, then T ě t for So replacing S with rS we still get a feasible strategy and induced decision time distribution T sure, so 1T ět is independent to X . is unchanged. From now on, we assume WLOG that St " s0 when T ă t. I only discuss the case ErT s ă 8. If ErT s " 8 then Lemma 2 is automatically true. 8ÿ 8ÿ t"1 t"1 ErT s " " PpT " tq t " PpT ě tq " 1 c PpT " tq tÿ τ"1 PpT ě tq c 8ÿ 8ÿ t"1 t"0 1 " PpT " tq 8ÿ 8ÿ τ"1 t"τ 19 " T ă t IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq ‰ T ě t ‰ T ě t ‰ ‰ T " t " t"1 8ÿ 8ÿ 8ÿ t"1 8ÿ PpT ě tqE IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq " IpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětq 8ÿ PpT ě tqE ` ě1 c "1 c "1 ErIpSt;XSt´1, 1T ětqs " 1 c c t"1 "1 tÑ8 IpSt;Xq ` lim τÿ " τÑ8 c PpT " tqE ě1 τÿ c ě1 lim τÑ8 c t"1 " IpA;Xq t"τ IpSt;XT " tq PpT " tqIpA;Xq lim τÑ8 lim t"1 c ` PpT ă tqE ¸ IpSt;Xq ´ IpSt´1;Xq pIpSt;Xq ´ IpSt´1;Xqq t"1 T ăt " s0. Fifth and Third line is from flow informativeness constraint. Forth line is from St sixth line is from chain rule of posterior separable information measure. Seventh line is from information process inequality and law of interated expectation. Second last line is from infor- Q.E.D. mation processing constraint. A.4 Proof of Lemma 3 Proof. Take any strategy pµt,T q feasible in Equation (6). Define ‰ # " Pt " PpT ď tq It " E Hpµq ´ Hpµtq T ą t (14) Now we prove that Equation (14) is a feasible strategy in Equation (7) and implements same value. First, since H is concave, then It ě 0. Since µ0 " µ, I0 " 0. Since µtT "t " π and µ0 " µ, then P0 " 0. Now we verify 9It ď c ´ ptp ¯I ´ Itq ErHpµt`dtqT ą ts " ´ Hpµq ´ ErHpµt`dtqT ą t ` dtsPpT ą t ` dtT ą tq ´ErHpµt`dtqT P pt, t ` dtssPpT P pt ` dtsT ą tq ErHpµt`dtqT ą ts ´ Pt`dt ´ Pt 1 ´ Pt ùñ It`dt "Hpµq ´ 1 ´ Pt 1 ´ Pt`dt ùñ It`dt ´ It "ErHpµtqT ą ts ´ 1 ´ Pt 1 ´ Pt`dt ErHpµt`dtqT ą ts ´ Pt`dt ´ Pt 1 ´ Pt ErHpµt`dtqT P pt, t ` dtss ErHpµt`dtqT P pt, t ` dtss ppErHpµq ´ Hpµt`dtqT P pt, t ` dtssq ´ ErHpµq ´ HpµtqT ą tsq "1 ´ Pt`dt 1 ´ Pt ´1 ´ Pt`dt 1 ´ Pt Pt`dt ´ Pt ´ 1 ´ Pt pErHpµtq ´ Hpµt`dtqT ą tsq Pt`dt ´ Pt 1 ´ Pt 2 ErHpµtqT ą ts ùñ dIt "Er´dHpµtqT ą ts ´ dPt 1 ´ Pt ùñ 9It ďc ´ 9Pt 1 ´ Pt p ¯I ´ Itq pEπ rHpµq ´ Hpνqs ´ Itq 20 First equality is law of iterated expectation. Second, third and forth equalities are rearranging terms. Fifth equality is from taking dt Ñ 0. Inequality is from ErdHpµtqµts ď ddt. Finally, deifne pt " 9Pt 1´Pt . Then ErρT s " ż 8 0 ż 8 0 ρtdPt " ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt To sum up, for any feasible strategy in Equation (6), there exists an feasible strategy in Equa- Q.E.D. tion (7) attaining same value. So the statement in Lemma 3 is true. proof of Theorem 3 ş8 ¯I dt. Therefore, it is sufficient to show that V ď 0 ρte´ c ¯I t c ş8 A.5 Proof. It is easy to verify that pt " c ¯I is feasible in Equation (7) and the objective function is 0 ρte´ c ¯I t c ¯I dt. Pick any pt exactly satisfying constraints in Equation (7). Now since pt and ρt are integrable, @ε ą 0, there exists T s.t. ż 8 0 Then there exists dt ą 0 s.t.: ż T 0 ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ď ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ` ε 0 T ż ż pk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt ´ ş kdt kdt e´ ş ´ ρkdt ρkdt ρkdt k"1 k"1 rT{dtsÿ rT{dtsÿ rT{dtsÿ rT{dtsÿ rT{dtsÿ k"1 k"1 k"1 kdt 0 pτdτ ´ e´ τ e´ p1 ´ Pτqpτdτ ` ε ş 0 psdspτdτ ` ε şpk`1qdt şpk`1qdt ¯ 1 ´ e´ şpk`1qdt ´ kdt 0 pτdτ pτdτ ` ε ¯ ` ε ¯ pτdτ ` ε ρkdte´ kdt 0 pτdτ ρkdtPkdt 1 ´ e´ kdt ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ď " " " " Now consider the following sequence:$''''''''&''''''''% pρk " ρkdt ppk " 1 ´ e´ pPk´1 " Pkdt pIk " Ikdt pc " cdt şpk`1qdt kdt pτdτ # We verify that: p ¯I ´pIkqppk ` ppIk`1 ´pIkqp1 ´ppkq ďpc pPk " pPk´1 ` p1 ´pPk´1qppk 0 pτdτ. Apply this to calculate pPk ´ pPk´1 " ş ¯ ´ " p1 ´pPk´1qppk. • Solve ODE defining Pt, we get Pt " 1 ´ e´ Ppk`1qdt ´ Pkdt " p1 ´ Pkdtq şpk`1qdt 1 ´ e´ pτdτ kdt t 21 • Solve ODE defining It, we get: t τ t 0 0 e e e e kdt kdt " şpk`1qdt ş τ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ It " ùñ Ipk`1qdt ´ Ikdt " " ż ş ż pk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt ´ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ ´ ¯ ´ τ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ ` şpk`1qdt şpk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt ¯pIk ` c ´ psds ´ 1 ùñ ∆pIkp1 ´ppkq " şpk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt ´pIk ´ ¯I ¯ "ppk ş ş ż pk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt First, since when τ P rkdt,pk ` 1qdts, we consider Ikdt ` e 1 ´ e´ ` c ş ş psds kdt kdt kdt kdt e kdt kdt kdt kdt e e psds Let t τ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ 0 0 e e kdt kdt kdt ż ş τ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ şpk`1qdt ş ż pk`1qdt psds ´ 1 ş ş ż pk`1qdt şpk`1qdt ş ¯ż pk`1qdt ż pk`1qdt τ psdspτdτ ´ppk ş τ psdspc ´ ¯Ipτqdτ τ psdsdτ ´ ¯I kdt kdt kdt ş kdt kdt kdt kdt e e e e τ psdspτdτ ¸ kdt τ psdsdτ ď dt. Then e Therefore, to sum up: We have checked that ppk,pPk,pIk is feasible in problem Equation (2) with parameter pρk andpc. Then by Theorem 1: τ psdsdτ ´ ¯I kdt τ psds ď 0, τ psdspτdτ ´ppk τ psdspτdτ ´ 1 ` e´ ż kdt ş kdt şpk`1qdt kdt t τ psdspτdτ ´ 1 ` e´ e "0&Hpt, tq " 0 psds ş t1 t psds " kdt e t1 t Hpt, t1q " ùñ BHpt, t1q Bt1 ùñ Hpt, t1q "0 ´ ∆pIkp1 ´ppkq `ppkp ¯I ´pIkq ďpc k´1pc ¯ppk ď ¯I ´pc 1 ´pPk´1 k´1pc ¯I ´pc ¯k c ´ ¯I 1 ´ c ¯I 8ÿ 8ÿ 8ÿ pρt pρt k"1 k"1 ρkdt " ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ď dt ¯I ¯I ¯I ¯I ¯k ď e´ c ¯I kdt Then: ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ď ρkdte´ c ¯I kdt c ¯I dt ` 2ε rT{dtsÿ pρk ż 8 0 k"1 ùñ ´ 1 ´ cdt ¯I ż 8 0 k"1 8ÿ k"1 22 ` 2ε dt ` ε Since logp1 ´ xq ď ´x, On the other hand, since ρte´ c ¯I t is integrable, there exists dt sufficiently small that: ùñ Let ε Ñ 0, then we showed that: 0 ż 8 ż 8 t"0 0 ρkdte´ c ¯I kdt c ¯I dt ď ρtp1 ´ Ptqptdt ď ρte´ c ¯I tdt ` ε ρte´ c ¯I tdt ` 3ε ż 8 0 V ď ρte´ c ¯I tdt 8ÿ ż 8 k"1 # A.6 Proof of Lemma 4 Proof. Similar to discussion in proof of Lemma 2, I only prove for ErT s ă 8. Let: Then be proof of Lemma 3: Pt " PpT ď tq It " ErHpµq ´ HpµtqT ą ts ` dIt " Er´dHpµtqT ą ts ´ dPt 1 ´ Pt ¯I ´ It 0 ż 8 ż 8 ż 8 ż 8 0 0 Consider ErT s: ErT s " 1 c ě 1 c " 1 c " ¯I c " ¯I c " ¯I c p1 ´ Ptqcdt p1 ´ PtqEr´dHpµtqT ą ts p1 ´ PtqdIt ` p ¯I ´ ItqdPt pp1 ´ PtqdIt ` Itdp1 ´ Ptqq ż 8 0 ` ` Itp1 ´ Ptq 0 8 0 Q.E.D. (15) Inequality is flow informativeness constraint. Second equality is by Equation (15). Forth equal- Q.E.D. ity is by intergral by part. 23
1810.02888	1	1810	2018-10-05T21:03:33	The Model Selection Curse	[ "econ.TH" ]	A "statistician" takes an action on behalf of an agent, based on the agent's self-reported personal data and a sample involving other people. The action that he takes is an estimated function of the agent's report. The estimation procedure involves model selection. We ask the following question: Is truth-telling optimal for the agent given the statistician's procedure? We analyze this question in the context of a simple example that highlights the role of model selection. We suggest that our simple exercise may have implications for the broader issue of human interaction with "machine learning" algorithms.	econ.TH	econ	The Model Selection Curse∗ Kfir Eliaz† and Ran Spiegler‡ October 9, 2018 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 8 8 8 2 0 . 0 1 8 1 : v i X r a Abstract A "statistician" takes an action on behalf of an agent, based on the agent's self-reported personal data and a sample involving other people. The action that he takes is an estimated function of the agent's report. The estimation procedure involves model selection. We ask the following question: Is truth-telling optimal for the agent given the statistician's procedure? We analyze this question in the context of a simple example that highlights the role of model selection. We suggest that our simple exercise may have implications for the broader issue of human interaction with "machine learning" algorithms. ∗This paper is extracted from a significantly longer working paper titled "Incentive- Compatible Estimators" (Eliaz and Spiegler (2018)). We thank Susan Athey, Yoav Binyamini, Assaf Cohen, Rami Atar, Lorens Imhof, Annie Liang, Benny Moldovanu, Ron Peretz and especially Martin Cripps for helpful conversations. We are also grateful to seminar and conference audiences at Aarhus, Bocconi, DICE, UCL, Brown, Yale, BRIQ, Warwick and ESSET, for their useful comments. †School of Economics, Tel-Aviv University and Economics Dept., Columbia University. E-mail: [email protected]. ‡School of Economics, Tel Aviv University; Department of Economics, University Col- lege London; and CfM. E-mail: [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction In recent years, actions in ever-expanding domains are taken on our behalf by automated systems that rely on machine-learning tools. Consider the case of online content provision. A website obtains information about a user's personal characteristics. Some of these characteristics are actively provided by the user himself; others are obtained by monitoring his online navigation history. The website then feeds these characteristics into a predictive sta- tistical model, which is estimated on a sample consisting of observations of other users. The estimated model then outputs a prediction of the user's ideal content. In domains like autonomous driving or medical decision mak- ing, AI systems are mostly confined to issuing recommendations for a human decision maker. In the future, however, it is possible that decisions in such domains will be entirely based on machine learning. How should users interact with such a procedure? In particular, should they truthfully share personal characteristics with the automatic system? Of course, in the presence of a conflict of interests between the two parties - e.g., when the online content provider has a distinct political or commercial agenda - the user might be better off if he misreports his characteristics or deletes "cookies" from his computer. This is a familiar situation of commu- nication under misaligned preferences, which seems amenable to economists' standard model of strategic information transmission as a game of incomplete information (with a common prior). However, suppose there is no conflict of interests between the two parties - i.e., the objective behind the machine-learning algorithm is to make the best prediction of the user's ideal action. But how do such actual systems per- form this prediction task? Consider a very basic textbook tool like LASSO1 (Tibshirani (1996)). This is a variant on standard linear regression analysis, which adds a cost function that penalizes non-zero coefficients. The proce- 1Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator 2 dure involves both model selection (i.e. choosing which of many available variables will enter the regression) and estimation of the selected variables' coefficients. The predicted action for an agent with a particular vector of personal characteristics x is the dependent variable's estimated value at x. Such a procedure is considered useful when users have many potentially rel- evant characteristics relative to the sample size, and especially when we can expect few of them to be relevant for predicting the agent's ideal action (i.e., the true data-generating process is sparse). However, LASSO is not a fundamentally Bayesian procedure. Although one can justify its estimates as properties of a Bayesian posterior derived from some prior (Tibshirani (1996), Park and Casella (2008), Gao et al. (2015)), these properties are not necessarily relevant for maximizing the user's welfare. Furthermore, there is no reason to assume that the prior that rationalizes LASSO in this manner coincides with the user's actual prior beliefs (the priors in the above-cited papers involve Laplacian distributions over parameters). Thus, neither the preferences nor the priors that take part in the Bayesian foundation for LASSO are necessarily the ones an economic modeler would like to attribute to the user in a plausible model of the interaction. This observation could be extended to many machine-learning predictive methods that are far more elaborate than the simple textbook example of penalized regression. If we want to model human interaction with such algo- rithms, some departure from the standard Bayesian framework with common priors seems warranted. Put differently, if one were to analyze a model with common priors, where a benevolent Bayesian decision maker tries to take the optimal action for an agent with unknown characteristics, then for almost all prior beliefs, the decision maker's behavior will not be perfectly mimicked by a familiar machine-learning procedure. Our approach in this paper is to take the statistician's procedure as given (rather than trying to provide a formal rationalization for it) and examine the user's strategic response to it. Machine-learning algorithms can be extremely complicated. Neverthe- 3 less, in this paper we follow the tradition of using simple "toy" models to get insight into complex phenomena. Economists have developed models in this tradition to study the behavior of large organizations or the macroeconomy; surely these are more complex than the most intricate machine-learning algo- rithm. Accordingly, our model is perhaps the simplest that can capture the key element we wish to address - namely, how the element of model selection in machine-learning algorithms affect users' self-reporting decision. Specifically, we present a model of an interaction between an "agent" and a "statistician" - the latter is a stand-in for an automated system that obtains personal data from the agent and outputs an action on his behalf. The agent has a single binary personal characteristic x, which is his private informa- tion. The agent has an ideal action, which is a function of x. This function is unknown. The statistician learns about it by obtaining noisy observations of other agents' ideal actions. This sample constitutes the statistician's pri- vate information. It is small, consisting of one observation for each value of x. The statistician follows a "penalized regression" procedure: the esti- mated coefficients of his model minimize a combination of the Residual Sum of Squares and a cost function that combines L0 and L1 penalties of the coefficient of x. The procedure's element of model selection in this simple example consists of the decision whether to admit x as a predictor of the agent's ideal action. With one binary characteristic and two sample points, this environment is as far from "big data" as one could imagine. Nevertheless, it shares a crucial feature with a typical big-data predicament that motivates machine-learning methods: the sample size is roughly the same as the number of potential explanatory variables, such that an estimation procedure that does not in- volve selection or shrinkage risks over-fitting (e.g., see Hastie et al. (2015)). Indeed, an unpenalized regression would perfectly fit the data. As a result, the estimator would have high variance and its predictive performance could be poor, relative to an estimator that excludes x or shrinks its coefficient. 4 Thus, the merit of our simple example is that it manages to capture in a tractable manner the over-fitting problem. We pose the following question: Fixing the statistician's procedure and the agent's prior belief over the true model's parameters, would the agent al- ways want to truthfully report his personal characteristics to the statistician? When this is the case for all possible priors, we say that the statistician's procedure (or "estimator") is incentive-compatible. Our analysis identifies an aspect of the problem that creates a misreporting incentive. Because the agent's report of x only matters when this variable is selected by the statisti- cian's procedure, he should only care about the distribution of the variable's estimated coefficient conditional on the "pivotal event" in which the vari- able's coefficient is not zero. One can construct distributions of the sample noise for which the estimated coefficient conditional on the pivotal event is so biased that the agent is better off introducing a counter-bias by misreporting his personal characteristic. We refer to this effect as the "model selection curse". As the term sug- gests, the logic is reminiscent of pivotal-reasoning phenomena like the Win- ner's Curse in auction theory (Milgrom and Weber (1982)) or the Swing Voter's Curse in the theory of strategic voting (Feddersen and Pesendor- fer (1996)). The model selection curse does not disappear with large sam- ples: When the noise distribution is asymmetric, the statistician's procedure can fail incentive-compatibility even asymptotically. In contrast, we show that when the sample noise is symmetrically distributed, the estimator is incentive-compatible. Related literature Our paper joins a small literature that has begun exploring incentive issues that emerge in the context of classical-statistics procedures. Cummings et al. (2015) study agents with privacy concerns who strategically report their personal data to an analyst who performs a linear regression. Caragiannis et al. (2016) consider the problem of estimating a sample mean when the agents 5 who provide the sample observations want to bias the mean close to their value. Hardt et al. (2016) consider the problem of designing the most accu- rate classifier when the input to the classifier is provided by a strategic agent who faces a cost of lying. Chassang et al. (2012) argue for a modification of randomized controlled trials when experimental subjects take unobserved actions that can affect treatment outcomes. Banerjee et al. (2017) ratio- nalize norms regarding experimental protocols (especially randomization) by modeling experimenters as ambiguity-averse decision makers. Spiess (2018) studies the design of estimation procedures that involve model selection when the statistician and the social planner have conflicting interests (e.g., when the statistician has a preference for reporting large effects). 2 A Model An agent has a privately known, binary personal characteristic x ∈ {0, 1}. In the context of medical decision making, x can represent a risk factor (e.g. smoking). In the context of online content provision, it can indicate whether the agent visited a particular website. A statistician must take an action a ∈ R on the agent's behalf. The agent's payoff from action a is −(a − f (x))2, where f (x) ∈ R is the agent's ideal action as a function of x. It will be convenient to write f (0) = β 0 and f (1) = β 0 + β1, such that β1 captures the effect of x on the agent's ideal action. The parameter profile β = (β0, β1) is unknown. Before taking an action, the statistician privately observes a noisy signal about f . Specifically, for each x = 0, 1, he obtains a single observation yx = f (x) + εx, where ε0 and ε1 are drawn i.i.d from some distribution with zero mean. Denote ε = (ε0, ε1). The observations do not involve the agent himself. We have thus described an environment with two-sided private information: the agent privately knows x, whereas the statistician has private access to the sample (y0, y1). 6 Equipped with the sample (y0, y1), the statistician follows a "penalized regression" procedure for estimating β. That is, he solves the following min- imization problem, min b0,b1 Xx=0,1 (yx − b0 − b1x)2 + C(b1) (1) The first term is the standard Residual Sum of Squares, whereas the sec- ond term is a cost associated with b1; the intercept b0 entails no cost. (Of course, given our simple set-up, referring to the procedure as a "penalized regression" is a bit of an exaggeration.) The solution to (1) is denoted b(ε, β) = (b0(ε, β), b1(ε, β)). We refer to (b(ε, β))ε as the estimator. The dependence on (ε, β) follows from the fact that the estimator is a function of (y0, y1), which in turn is determined by (ε, β). We assume the penalty function C(b1) = c01b16=0 + c1b1 where c0, c1 ≥ 0. This is a linear combination of two common forms: a fixed cost for the mere inclusion of a non-zero coefficient (L0 penalty) and a cost for the magnitude of the coefficient in absolute value (L1 penalty, or LASSO).2 Assume that when the statistician is indifferent between including and excluding x, he includes it. In the absence of the penalty C, the solution to (1) is b0 = y0, b1 = y1−y0, such that the Residual Sum of Squares is zero. In other words, the estimator perfectly fits the data. As a result, the estimator's predictive performance will tend to be poor - relative to an estimator that sets b0 = 1 2 (y0 +y1), b1 = 0 - when the true value of β1 is relatively small. Having estimated f , the statistician receives a report r ∈ X from the agent. The statistician then takes the action a = b0 + b1r. The agent's 2Adding an L2 (Ridge) term c2(b1)2 would not change any of the results in the paper. 7 expected payoff for a given β is therefore − Eε [(b0(ε, β) + b1(ε, β)r − β 0 − β 1x)]2 (2) This expression can also be written as −Eε[ f (r) − f (x)]2 where f (r) = b0(ε, β) + b1(ε, β)r is the estimated model's value at the agent's self-report r. Note that the agent's preferences are given by a quadratic loss function. This is also a standard criterion for evaluating estimators' predictive suc- cess. Suppose that r = x - i.e., the agent submits a truthful report of his personal characteristic. Then, the agent's expected payoff coincides with the estimator's mean squared error. The following are the key definitions of this paper. Definition 1 The estimator is incentive compatible at a given prior belief over the true model f (i.e. the parameters β) if the agent is weakly better off truthfully reporting his personal characteristic, given his prior. That is, Eβ Eεh f (x) − f (x)i2 for every x, r ∈ {0, 1}. ≤ Eβ Eεh f (r) − f (x)i2 In this definition, the expectation operator Eε is taken with respect to the given exogenous distribution over the noise realization profile. The ex- pectation operator Eβ is taken with respect to the agent's prior belief over β. 8 Definition 2 The estimator is incentive compatible if it is incentive com- patible at every prior belief. Equivalently, Eεh f (x) − f (x)i2 ≤ Eεh f (r) − f (x)i2 (3) for every true model f and every x, r ∈ {0, 1}. Incentive-compatibility means that the agent is unable to perform better by misreporting his personal characteristic, regardless of his beliefs over the true model's parameters. How should we interpret this requirement, given that we do not necessarily want to think of the agent as being sophisticated enough to think in these terms? One interpretation is that lack of incentive- compatibility is a purely normative statement about the agent's welfare - namely, given how the statistician takes actions on the agent's behalf, it would be advisable for the agent to misreport. Furthermore, there are op- portunities for new firms to enter and offer the agent paid advice for how to manipulate the procedure - in analogy to the industry of "search engine optimization". Incentive-compatibility theoretically eliminates the need for such an industry. In the context of online content provision, deviating from x = 1 to r = 0 can be interpreted as "deleting a cookie". This deviation is straightforward to implement, and the agent can check if it leads to better content match in the long run. The agent's expected payoff function is known to be decomposable into two terms, one capturing the bias of estimator and another its variance. Comparing the predictive success of different estimators thus boils down to trading off the estimators' bias and variance. Incentive-compatibility can thus be viewed as a collection of bias-variance comparisons between two estimators: one is the statistician's estimator, and another is an estimator that applies the statistician's procedure to r rather than x. The latter is not an estimation method that a real-life statistician is likely to propose, but it arises naturally in our setting. 9 3 Analysis We first derive a complete characterization of the estimator. Proposition 1 The solution to the statistician's minimization problem (1) is as follows: b1(ε, β) =  and β1 + ε1 − ε0 − c1 β1 + ε1 − ε0 + c1 0 if if otherwise β 1 + ε1 − ε0 −p(c1)2 + 2c0 ≥ 0 β 1 + ε1 − ε0 +p(c1)2 + 2c0 ≤ 0 (4) b0(ε, β) = 1 2 [y0 + y1 − b1(ε, β)] The proof is mechanical and relegated to the supplementary appendix. Note that L0 penalty leads to model selection without affecting the value of b1 conditional on being non-zero. The L1 penalty term leads to both shrinkage and selection. Let us now turn to incentive-compatibility. Two factors create a problem in this regard: sample noise and model selection. Neither factor is problem- atic on its own, as the following pair of observations establishes. Claim 1 Suppose that ε = (0, 0) with probability one. Then, the estimator is incentive compatible. Proof. Suppose that β1 is such that b1 = 0. Then, the agent's report has no effect on the statistician's action, and incentive-compatibility holds trivially. Now suppose β1 is such that b1 > 0. Given the characterization of b1, we must have β 1 − c1 ≥ 0. The statistician's action as a function of the agent's report is b0 if r = 0 and b0 + b1 if r = 1, where b0 = β 0 + b0 + b1 = β 0 + 1 2 1 2 β1 − β1 − 1 2 1 2 b1 = β 0 + 1 2 1 2 (β1 − c1) β 1 − 1 2 b1 + b1 = β0 + β 1 + 1 2 (β 1 − c1) 10 When x = 0 (x = 1), the agent's ideal action is β 0 (β 0 + β1), and since β1 − c1 ≥ 0, the action b0 (b0 + b1) is closer to the ideal point than b0 + b1 (b0). Thus, honesty is optimal for the agent. A similar calculation establishes incentive-compatibility when b1 < 0. Claim 2 If c0 = c1 = 0, then the estimator is incentive-compatible. Proof. When c0 = c1 = 0, we have b1 = (β 1 + ε1 − ε0). Suppose x = 1 and the agent contemplates whether to report r = 0. In this case inequality (3) can be simplified into Eε[(b1(ε, β))2 + 2b1(ε, β) · (b0(ε, β) − β0 − β 1)] ≤ 0 Plugging in the expressions for b0(ε, β) and b1(ε, β) given by (4), this inequal- ity reduces to E¯ε0,¯ε1[−(β 1)2 + 2β 1ε0 + (ε1)2 − (ε0)2] ≤ 0 (5) This inequality holds for all β 1 because ε0 and ε1 are i.i.d with mean zero. An analogous argument shows that an agent with x = 0 will not benefit from reporting r = 1. Thus, sampling noise and model selection are both necessary to produce violations of incentive-compatibility in our simple set-up. This finding should not be taken for granted. First, even in the absence of sampling noise, the penalty C creates a wedge between the statistician's objective function and the agent's utility. Therefore, it is not obvious a priori that this de-facto conflict of interest does not give the agent an incentive to misreport. Second, as long as the agent's prior over β1 is not diffuse, the zero-penalty estima- tor does not produce actions that maximize his subjective expected utility. This, too, creates a de-facto conflict of interests between the two parties, which nevertheless does not give the agent a sufficient incentive to misre- port. One might think that the unbiasedness of the zero-penalty estimator 11 explains Claim 2. However, this intuition is misleading because the agent's utility function involves a bias-variance trade-off. As a result, Claim 2 breaks down when the statistician draws different numbers of observations for x = 0 and x = 1: the agent may be willing to experience a biased action due to misreporting because it will reduce its variance. We now turn to the case of noisy measurement and positive penalties. The following example illustrates how incentive-compatibility can fail in this case. An example: Bernoulli noise Assume the following noise distribution. For each x: −1 with probability p d = p/(1 − p) with probability 1 − p εx =  where p > 1 (c1 = 0). 2, such that d > 1. For simplicity, we consider only the L0 penalty Consider an agent with x = 1 who reports r = 0. This misreporting violates incentive-compatibility if there is some β1 for which Eε [b0(ε, β) + b1(ε, β) − β 0 − β 1]2 > Eε [b0(ε, β) − β 0 − β 1]2 Because the agent's misrepresentation only matters in the "pivotal event" in which b1(ε, β) 6= 0, this inequality can be rewritten as Eε0,ε1[−(β 1)2 + 2β 1ε0 + (ε1)2 − (ε0)2 (β 1 + ε1 − ε1)2 ≥ 2c0] > 0 (6) For every β 1 > 0, we can find a range of values for c0 such that (β 1+ε1−ε0)2 ≥ 2c0 only when ε1 = d and ε0 = −1. In this case, (6) is reduced to β1 < d− 1. Therefore, every pair of positive numbers (β 1, c0) that satisfies the in- 12 equalities −(d + 1) < √2c0 − β 1 < d + 1 β 1 < d − 1 will violate incentive-compatibility. The intuition for this effect is as follows. The pivotal event {ε b1(ε, β) 6= 0} is determined by the difference ε1−ε0. For a range of (β1, c0) values, ε1 − ε0 = d + 1 with probability one conditional on the pivotal event. This produces such a biased estimate of b1 that the agent wants to introduce an offsetting bias in the opposite direction by reporting x = 0. (cid:3) The example illustrates a feature we refer to as the "model selection curse", in the spirit of the "winner's curse" and "swing voter's curse". Like these familiar phenomena, the model selection curse involves statistical in- ferences from a "pivotal event". Here, the pivotal event is the inclusion of an explanatory variable in the statistician's predictive model. The agent's de- cision whether to misreport his personal characteristic is relevant only if the statistician's model includes it. Misreporting will change the statistician's action by b1(ε, β)(r − x). Therefore, the agent only cares about the distribu- tion of b1(ε, β) conditional on the event {ε b1(ε, β) 6= 0}. This distribution can be so skewed that the agent will prefer to introduce a counter-bias by misreporting. A key feature of the above example is the asymmetry in the noise dis- tribution. Our next result shows that this is a crucial feature: Symmetric noise ensures incentive-compatibility of the statistician's procedure. For con- venience, we consider the case in which the distribution of εx is described by a well-defined density function. The result is stated for arbitrary c0, c1 ≥ 0. Proposition 2 If εx is symmetrically distributed around zero, then the esti- mator is incentive-compatible. 13 Proof. Consider the deviation from x = 1 to r = 0. This deviation mat- ters only if b1(ε, β) 6= 0. Incentive-compatibility thus requires the following inequality to hold for all β0, β1: Eε0,ε1[(b1(ε, β))2 + 2b1(ε, β)(b0(ε, β) − β 0 − β 1) b1(ε, β) 6= 0] ≤ 0 Plugging the expression for b0(ε) given by (4), this inequality reduces to Eε0,ε1[b1(ε, β)(−β 1 + ε0 + ε1) b1(ε, β) 6= 0] ≤ 0 Fix b1(ε, β) at some value b∗ 1 6= 0. Define E(b∗) = {(ε0, ε1) : b1(ε, β) = b∗ 1}. Suppose E(b∗) is non-empty. Then, (u, v) ∈ E(b∗ 1) implies that (−v,−u) ∈ E(b∗). This follows immediately from the fact that b1(ε, β) is defined by the difference ε1 − ε0. Because ε0 and ε1 are i.i.d and symmetrically distributed around zero, the realizations (u, v) and (−v,−u) have the same probability. This implies that for any given b∗ 1 6= 0, Eε0,ε1[b1(ε, β)(ε0 + ε1)b1(ε, β) = b∗ 1] = 0 Therefore, showing that the deviation from x = 1 to r = 0 is unprofitable reduces to showing that β 1 Eε0,ε1[b1(ε, β) b1(ε, β) 6= 0] ≥ 0 which simplifies further to β 1 Eε0,ε1(b1(ε, β)) ≥ 0 Suppose without loss of generality that β1 > 0. We will show that Eε0,ε1(b1(ε, β)) ≥ 0. Denote ∆ = ε1 − ε0. Let G and g denote the cdf and density of ∆. Since ε0 and ε1 are symmetrically distributed around zero, 14 g is symmetric. Denote We need to show that c∗ =p(c1)2 + 2c0 Z −c∗−β1 −∞ (β1 + ∆ + c1)g(∆) +Z ∞ c∗−β1 (β1 + ∆ − c1)g(∆) ≥ 0 (7) Denote t = β1 + c∗, s = β 1 − c1, and observe that because c∗ ≥ c1 ≥ 0, t + s > 0 and t − s > 0. By the symmetry of g, (7) becomes =Z −t (s+∆)g(∆) = tG(−t)+sG(s)+Z t (t+∆)g(∆)+Z ∞ ∆g(∆) ≥ 0 (8) −∞ −s s Applying integration by parts and the symmetry of g, (8) becomes Z ∞ −∞ ∆g(∆) +Z s −∞ G(∆) −Z −t −∞ G(∆) ≥ 0 −∞ ∆g(∆) = Eε0,ε1(ε1 − ε0) = 0, the inequality we need to prove An analogous argument shows that deviation from x = 0 to r = 1 is unprofitable. The intuition behind this result is that symmetric noise curbs the model selection curse: although model selection implies that b1 is a biased estimate of β1, the bias is too small to give the agent the incentive to introduce the counter-bias that results from misreporting. 15 Since R ∞ reduces to Z s which holds because s > −t. −∞ G(∆) −Z −t −∞ G(∆) ≥ 0 4 Does the Curse Vanish with Large Sam- ples? So far, we focused on a sample with two observations, hence, one may think that the model selection curse is a small-sample phenomenon. In this section we show that this need not be the case. Extend our model by assuming that for each x = 0, 1, the statistician obtains N observations of the form x = f (x) + εn yn x is i.i.d with mean zero across all x, n. The statistician's problem is essentially the same: x, n = 1, ..., N, where εn N min b0,b1 Xx=0,1 Xn=1 (yn x − b0 − b1xn k )2 + N (c01b16=0 + c1b1) The entire model and its analysis are unchanged, except that now ε = (εn 1 )n=1,...,N; and in the solution for the estimator (4), εx is replaced with the average sample noise ¯εx = 1 x. Denote ε = (εn x)x=0,1;n=1,...,N. 0 , εn i=1 εn N Pn Returning to the Bernoulli-noise example from the previous section, we investigate whether the set of parameters that violate incentive compatibility vanishes as N → ∞. We continue to assume c1 = 0 and restrict attention to the case of β1 > 0 - both are without loss of generality. Suppose that for every x = 0, 1 and every observation n = 1, ..., N, εn x is independently drawn from the Bernoulli distribution that assigns probability p > 1 2 to −1 and probability 1 − p to d = p/(1 − p). Let ¯εx(N) denote the average noise realization over all the N observations for x ∈ {0, 1}. The pivotal event {ε b1(ε, β) 6= 0} can be written as (cid:8)ε ¯ε1(N) − ¯ε0(N) /∈(cid:0)−√2c0 − β 1,√2c0 − β 1(cid:1)(cid:9) (9) Our goal is find the set of parameters for which incentive-compatibility is violated in the N → ∞ limit. 16 Proposition 3 The set of parameters β1 > 0 and c0, d for which incentive- compatibility is violated in the N → ∞ limit is given by β 1 < c0√2c0 + 2d d−1 (10) Proof. We first find the limit distribution over (¯ε0(N), ¯ε1(N)), conditional 0, ..., εN on the event (9). To do this, it helps to combine the two samples (ε1 0 ) 1 ) into one composite sample (η1, ...., ηN ), such that for every n, and (ε1 ηn = (εn 0 ). Thus, ηn is drawn i.i.d according to the following distribution π: 1, ..., εN 1 , εn π−1,−1 = Pr(−1,−1) = p2 π−1,d = Pr(−1, d) = p(1 − p) = Pr(d,−1) = πd,−1 πd,d = Pr(d, d) = (1 − p)2 Denoting by si,j the empirical frequency of the realization (i, j) in this com- posite sample allows us to redefine the pivotal event in terms of a subset of empirical frequencies s = (s−1,−1, s−1,d, sd,−1, sd,d): RN =(cid:26)sN (sd,−1 − s−1,d) /∈(cid:18)−√2c0 − β 1 d + 1 , √2c0 − β 1 d + 1 (cid:19)(cid:27) For any empirical distribution s, let D(sπ) the relative entropy of s with respect to π: Denote D(sπ) = Xi,j∈{−1,d} θl = −√2c0 − β1 d + 1 πi,j(cid:19) si,j ln(cid:18) si,j √2c0 − β1 θh = d + 1 (11) We will now show that in the N → ∞ limit, the distribution over sN con- ditional on sN ∈ RN assigns probability one to the unique s that minimizes D(sπ) subject to the constraint sd,−1 − s−1,d = θh. Recall that we are re- 17 stricting attention to a range of parameters such that −1 < θl < θh < 1. We can partition the pivotal event RN into two closed intervals: [−1, θl] and [θh, 1]. Because β 1 > 0, θl < θh. The relative entropy function D(sπ) is strictly convex in s and attains a unique unconstrained minimum of zero at s = π. Furthermore, because π−1,d = πd,−1, D(sπ) treats s−1,d and s−d,1 symmetrically. Therefore, for any θ ∈ [−1, 1], the minimum of D(sπ) subject to s−1,d − s−d,1 = θ is equal to the minimum of D(sπ) subject to sd,−1 − s−1,d = θ, such that the minimum of D(sπ) subject to sd,−1 − s−1,d = θ is strictly increasing with θ. Therefore, the minimum of D(sπ) subject to sd,−1 − s−1,d ∈ [θh, 1] is strictly below the minimum of D(sπ) subject to sd,−1 − s−1,d ∈ [−1, θl]. By Sanov's Theorem (see Theorem 11.4.1 in Cover and Thomas (2006, p. 362)), the probability of the event [θh, 1] is arbitrarily higher than the probability of the event [−1, θl] as N → ∞. Therefore, we can take the pivotal event to be [θh, 1]. Furthermore, by the conditional limit theorem (Theorem 11.6.2 in Cover and Thomas (2006, p. 371)), in the N → ∞ limit, the probability that sd,−1 − s−1,d = θh conditional on the event sd,−1 − s−1,d ∈ [θh, 1] is one. It follows that the objective function is D(sπ) and the constraints are √2c0 − β1 d + 1 sd,−1 − s−1,d = s−1,−1 + s−1,d + sd,−1 + sd,d = 1 Writing down the Lagrangian, the first-order conditions with respect to (si,j) are (λ1 and λ2 are the multipliers of the first and second constraints): 1 + ln s−1,−1 − ln p2 − λ2 = 0 1 + ln sd,d − ln(1 − p)2 − λ2 = 0 1 + ln sd,−1 − ln p(1 − p) − λ1 − λ2 = 0 1 + ln s−1,d − ln p(1 − p) + λ1 − λ2 = 0 18 These equations imply sd,−1s−1,d = sd,ds−1,−1 s−1,−1 = d2sd,d Now, since d = p 1 − p ¯ε1 = (sd,−1 + sd,d)(d + 1) − 1 ¯ε0 = (s−1,d + sd,d)(d + 1) − 1 we have that in the N → ∞ limit, the distribution over ε conditional on the pivotal event assigns probability one to ¯ε0 = − ¯ε1 = 1 2 1 2 (√2c0 − β1) − (√2c0 − β 1) − d d − 1 d d − 1 + + 1 2s(√2c0 − β1)2 + 2s(√2c0 − β 1)2 + 1 4d2 (d − 1)2 4d2 (d − 1)2 Plugging these values into (6)) produces the result. Thus, the incentive-compatibility problem in the Bernoulli-noise exam- ple does not vanish when the sample is large. Moreover, the more skewed the underlying noise distribution and the larger the complexity cost, the larger the set of prior beliefs for which incentive-compatibility is violated in the N → ∞ limit. The reason that large samples do not fix the incentive- compatibility problem is that the agent's reasoning hinges on the pivotal event in which the variable is included. Therefore, even if the estimator's unconditional distribution is asymptotically well-behaved, the relevant ques- tion for incentive-compatibility is whether it is well-behaved conditional on the pivotal event. 19 Recall that our original assumption of only two observations captured (in a highly stylized fashion) the idea that model selection can avert over-fitting. When we continue to assume a single explanatory variable and raise N, the over-fitting problem is attenuated and the role of model selection diminishes. Indeed, practitioners of penalized regression adjust penalty parameters to sample size, such that c0, c1 → 0 as N → ∞. The key question is therefore whether the rate by which c0 or c1 decrease with N is fast enough to outweigh the model selection curse. To answer this question, one needs to characterize the condition for incentive-compatibility for arbitrary values of N, c0, c1. This is an open question that we leave for future work. 5 Conclusion Interactions between humans and machines that follow statistical procedures are becoming ubiquitous, giving rise to interesting questions for economists. Our question is whether human decision makers should act cooperatively to- ward a machine that employs a non-Bayesian statistical procedure that aims at good predictions. We demonstrated, via a toy example, that the element of model selection in the procedure creates non-trivial incentive issues. Our little exercise exposed a major methodological challenge. The stan- dard economic model of interactive decision making is based on the Bayesian, common-prior paradigm. However, the actual behavior of machine decision makers is often hard to reconcile with this paradigm. We addressed this chal- lenge by examining the agent's response to a f ixed statistical procedure with a given specification of its parameters. One would like to endogenize these choices. However, given that the procedure is fundamentally non-Bayesian, capturing this endogenization with a well-defined ex-ante optimization prob- lem is not obvious. Incorporating incentive-compatibility as a criterion for selecting prediction methods is therefore conceptually challenging. In general, modeling strategic interactions that involve machine learning 20 requires us to depart from the conventional Bayesian framework, toward an approach that admits decision makers who act as non-Bayesian statisticians. Such approaches are familiar to us from the bounded rationality literature (e.g., Osborne and Rubinstein (1998), Spiegler (2006), Cherry and Salant (2016) and Liang (2018)). Further study of human-machine interactions is likely to generate new ideas for modeling interactions that involve boundedly rational human decision makers. References [1] Banerjee, A., S. Chassang, S. Montero and E. Snowberg (2017). "A Theory of Experimenters," NBER Working Paper No. 23867. [2] Caragiannis, I, Ariel D. Procaccia and N. Shah (2016): "Truthful Uni- variate Estimators," Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning 48. [3] Chassang, S., P. Miquel and E. Snowberg (2012). "Selective trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments," American Economic Review 102, 1279-1309. [4] Cherry, J. and Y. Salant (2006). "Statistical Inference in Games," North- western University Working Paper. [5] Cover, T. and J. Thomas (2006). Elements of Information Theory, Sec- ond Edition, Wiley. [6] Cummings, R., S. Ioannidis and K. Ligett (2015). "Truthful Linear Re- gression," Conference on Learning Theory, 448-483. [7] Eliaz, K. and R. Spiegler (2018). "Incentive-Compatible Estimators," Tel-Aviv University Working Paper. 21 [8] Feddersen, T. and W. Pesendorfer (1996). "The Swing Voter's Curse," American Economic Review 86, 408-424. [9] Gao, C., van der Vaart, A. and H. Zhou (2015). "A General Framework for Bayes Structured Linear Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02174. [10] Hardt, M., N. Megiddo, C. Papadimitriou and J. Wootters (2016): "Strategic Classification," Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, 111-122 [11] Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani and M. Wainwright (2015). Statistical Learning with Sparsity: the LASSO and Generalizations, CRC press. [12] Liang, A. (2018): "Games of Incomplete Information Played by Statis- ticians," University of Pennsylvania Working Paper. [13] Milgrom, P. and R. Weber (1982). "A Theory of Auctions and Compet- itive Bidding," Econometrica 50, 1089-1122. [14] Osborne, M. and A. Rubinstein (1998). "Games with Procedurally Ra- tional Players," American Economic Review 88, 834-847. [15] Park, T. and G. Casella (2008). "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association 103, 681-686. [16] Spiegler, R. (2006): "The Market for Quacks," Review of Economic Studies 73, 1113-1131. [17] Spiess, J. (2018). "Optimal Estimation when Researcher and Social Pref- erences are Misaligned," Harvard University Working Paper. [18] Tibshirani, R. (1996). "Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodologi- cal), 267-288. 22 Appendix: Proof of Proposition 1 Fix the realization of sample noise ε. The coefficients b0 and b1 are given by the solution to the first-order conditions of min b0,b1 Xx=0,1 (yx − b0 − b1x)2 + c01b16=0 + c1b1 where the dependence of the coefficients b0 and b1 on the noise realization ε is suppressed for notational ease. The first-order condition with respect to b0 is (y0 − b0) + (y1 − b0 − b1) = 0 while the first-order condition with respect to b1 when b1 6= 0 gives 2(y1 − b0 − b1) = sign(b1)c1 (12) (13) In particular, 2(y1 − b0 − b1) = c1 when b1 > 0, and 2(y1 − b0 − b1) = −c1 when b1 < 0. From (12) we obtain b0 = 1 2 (y0 + y1 − b1) Plugging this into (13), we obtain the following characterization of b1 condi- tional on it being non-zero: b1 =( β1 + ε1 − ε0 − c1 β1 + ε1 − ε0 + c1 if b1 > 0 if b1 < 0 This means in particular that when β1 + ε1 − ε0 ∈ (−c1, c1), b1 = 0. To complete the characterization of when b1 6= 0, we compute the differ- ence between the Residual Sum of Squares (RSS) when the coefficient b1 is 23 1 2 b1] = b1[y1 − y0 − = [y1 − y0 − sign(b1)c1][y1 − y0 − = (c1)2 1 2 1 2 1 2 (y1 − y0)2 − (β 1 + ε1 − ε0)2 − = 1 2 (y1 − y0 − sign(b1)c1)] admitted and when it is omitted. First, RSS(b1 6= 0) = (b0 − y0)2 + (b0 + b1 − y1)2 where b0 and b1 are given by (12) and (13). In contrast, when b1 is omitted, b0 = 1 2(y0 + y1), such that RSS(b1 = 0) =(cid:18)1 2 y0 + 1 2 y1 − y0(cid:19)2 +(cid:18)1 2 y0 + 1 2 y1 − y1(cid:19)2 = 1 2 (y1 − y0)2 It follows that RSS(b1 = 0) − RSS(b1 6= 0) = 1 2 (y1 − y0)2 − (b0 − y0)2 − (b0 + b1 − y1)2 1 2 (c1)2 The condition for b1 6= 0 is i.e. RSS(b1 = 0) − RSS(b1 6= 0) ≥ c0 (β 1 + ε1 − ε0)2 ≥ (c1)2 + 2c0 This concludes the proof. 24
1810.02004	2	1810	2018-10-25T23:13:35	Topological Connectedness and Behavioral Assumptions on Preferences: A Two-Way Relationship	[ "econ.TH", "math.GN" ]	This paper offers a comprehensive treatment of the question as to whether a binary relation can be consistent (transitive) without being decisive (complete), or decisive without being consistent, or simultaneously inconsistent or indecisive, in the presence of a continuity hypothesis that is, in principle, non-testable. It identifies topological connectedness of the (choice) set over which the continuous binary relation is defined as being crucial to this question. Referring to the two-way relationship as the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein (ES) research program, it presents four synthetic, and complete, characterizations of connectedness, and its natural extensions; and two consequences that only stem from it. The six theorems are novel to both the economic and the mathematical literature: they generalize pioneering results of Eilenberg (1941), Sonnenschein (1965), Schmeidler (1971) and Sen (1969), and are relevant to several applied contexts, as well as to ongoing theoretical work.	econ.TH	econ	Topological Connectedness and Behavioral Assumptions on Preferences: A Two-Way Relationship∗ M. Ali Khan† and Metin Uyanık‡ October 25, 2018 8 1 0 2 t c O 5 2 ] . H T n o c e [ 2 v 4 0 0 2 0 . 0 1 8 1 : v i X r a Abstract: This paper offers a comprehensive treatment of the question as to whether a binary re- lation can be consistent (transitive) without being decisive (complete), or decisive without being consistent, or simultaneously inconsistent or indecisive, in the presence of a continuity hypothesis that is, in principle, non-testable. It identifies topological connectedness of the (choice) set over which the continuous binary relation is defined as being crucial to this question. Referring to the two-way relationship as the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein (ES) research program, it presents four synthetic, and complete, characterizations of connectedness, and its natural extensions; and two consequences that only stem from it. The six theorems are novel to both the economic and the mathematical literature: they generalize pioneering results of Eilenberg (1941), Sonnenschein (1965), Schmeidler (1971) and Sen (1969), and are relevant to several applied contexts, as well (140 words) as to ongoing theoretical work. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C00, D00, D01 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification Numbers: 91B55, 37E05. Key Words: Connected, 2-connected, k-connected, k-non-triviality, continuous, complete, tran- sitive, semi-transitive, pseudo-transitive, fragile, flimsy Running Title: Topological Connectedness and Preferences ∗A previous version of this paper was completed while Uyanık was a post-doctoral fellow at the Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy at the University of Rochester; earlier versions were presented at Rutgers University (April 19, 2017), the University of Rochester (May 4, 2017), the University of Queensland (August 8, 2018), the 17th SAET Conference in Faro (June 30, 2017), and the 36th Australasian Economic Theory Workshop in Canberra (February 8, 2018). We are grateful to Rich McLean for the SAET invitation, and thank him for detailed and indispensable advice on the presentation of our results. We also thank Paul Anand, Han Bleichrodt, Ying Chen, John Duggan, Hulya Eraslan, Filippo Massari, Andy McLennan, Onur Ozgur, John Quah, Eddie Schlee and Rajiv Vohra for encouragement and stimulating conversation. †Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218. ‡School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072. Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notational and Conceptual Preliminaries 3 The Theory 3.1 A General Result on k-Connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Specializations: Connectedness and 2-Connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 A Return to Connectedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Sen's Deconstruction of the Transitivity Postulate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Applications of the Theory: A Brief Excursus 4.1 Real-valued Representation of Preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Shafer's Non-Transitive Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3 Walrasian Economies and Normal-Form Games . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4 Other Potential Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Concluding Remarks 6 Proofs of the Results 2 5 8 8 9 14 16 22 24 25 26 28 30 31 1 Just as it is possible to speak prose without noticing that fact ...., it is possible also to be talking topology without sensing any topology around us. The fear of being 'unmeasurable' can be a rather raw worry (more polemical than illumi- nating) and such a diagnosis can serve as a reactionary diversion from reasoning (reasoning that we can sensibly use). ... [it] explains why set theory (and, based on that, topological ideas) can be very useful in practical economic and social evaluation.1 Sen (2017) 1 Introduction The postulates of transitivity, completeness and continuity of a binary relation defined over a (choice) set are basic to modern microeconomic theory, and this paper addresses itself to the logical implications of these properties in an exclusively topological register. In particular, it asks whether an agent can be decisive, in the formal sense of having complete preferences, without being consistent, again in the formal sense of having transitive preferences? Or to turn the matter on its head, whether she can be consistent without being decisive? Or even, in the case of an anti-symmetric binary relation, inconsistent or indecisive or both? It shows, to put it in a nutshell, that all these possibilities are foreclosed under the standard technical assumption of continuity (typically taken to be an innocuous technical property that cannot be falsified by any finite number of observations) in any topology in which the choice set is connected. Indeed, the paper goes beyond these three basic questions to consider additional complementary queries, and in their turn, settles them by appealing to the interplay of the topological properties of continuity and connectedness. As such, the results raise a subtle but striking challenge to the modeling of agency in the theory of binary choice. To be sure, the questions we ask have a venerable history in economic theory and in mathematics, though they have not been posed and investigated in the way that we do here. The treatment in the antecedent literature has been piecemeal.2 Thus, in the context of a connected choice set, and a correspondingly continuous binary relation, 1. Eilenberg (1941) showed that completeness and the impossibility of indifference between any two distinct items (a sort of extreme decisiveness), imply transitivity, 2. Sonnenschein (1965) showed that completeness and semi-transitivity of the binary relation imply its transitivity,3 and 1The first sentence is taken from p. 298, and the second from p. 367 in Sen (2017). Sen fills the ellipsis in the first by referring to Moli`ere, and in the second, by the Aristotelian counsel that one aspire to as much precision as the subject deserves. This is also the place to acknowledge our substantial indebtedness to Sonnenschein (1965) and Sen (2017) for rekindling our interest in the subject on which we report in this paper: in fact, the conclusion of the former could be read as spelling out the basic motivation for this paper as well. 2See, for example, Barten and Bohm (1982), a survey that still remains fresh and worth reading. The authors cite Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Schmeidler, reproduce the proof of Schmeidler's result, differentiate points of departure based on whether strict or weak preferences as used as primitive, but do not make the connections that we do here. The properties of the binary relation referred to below constitute standard textbook material, as in Barten and Bohm (1982) or Sen (2017) for example, but precise definitions are spelt out for the reader's convenience in the section to follow. 3We may point out here that Sonnenschein (1965) is an elaboration of his Ph.D. dissertation that dispensed with Eilenberg's requirement that the binary relation be anti-symmetric, that preferences not be constrained by the requirement of singleton indifference sets. We return to this point in the sequel. In fact, a careful reader 2 3. Schmeidler (1971) showed that transitivity and non-triviality of the binary relation imply its completeness. Eilenberg (1941) also furnished necessary and sufficient conditions for a connected topologi- cal space to be ordered, which is to say, conditions under which it admits an anti-symmetric, transitive, complete and continuous relation on it.4 Connected topologies are of course ubiquitous in economic theory,5 and these pioneering contributions testify to the substantive restrictions they engender when the continuity property of the ambient binary relation is indexed by them. The sufficiency theorems they offer move forward from connectedness, and they all question the opinion, still pervasive in some circles, that topological assumptions on the choice set, and on the objectives that are defined over that set, have no substantive and behavioral content. They are simply seen as innocuous technical requirements made to guarantee the existence of an optimal choice.6 Thus Wakker (1988a) writes: [...] by themselves these topological assumptions are merely "technical." They have no empirical implications and cannot be verified or falsified by observations. Technical as- sumptions, while not very satisfactory, are not very bothersome either. They merely serve to make mathematical machinery work smoothly. They are void of empirical meaning, and so do not entail obscurity.7 It was perhaps Schmeidler who offered, though more understatedly than warranted, the sharpest counter to this prevailing opinion. He wrote: Order properties of preference relations have intuitive meaning in the context of the behav- ioral sciences. This is not the case with topological conditions. They are only assumed in order to utilize the mathematical tools applied in the analysis of some problems in the be- havioral sciences. They may imply, however, as in the theorem, a very restrictive condition of plausible nature. In an article scarcely over a page long, and without any references to its precursors in the work not only of Eilenberg and Sonnenschein, but also Rader (1963) and Sen (1969), Schmeidler pre- sented a theorem that confined itself solely to the topological register. With all linear structures, in particular, dispensed with, he articulated the claim that any topology that ensured connect- edness of the choice set, and the continuity of a non-trivial and transitive relation over that set, necessarily guarantees the completeness of the relation -- a sharp and influential example of a technical requirement leading to a substantive conclusion of a behavioral nature. However, one can ask whether Schmeidler's results, as well as those of the others, can be framed under a broader rubric that enables one to see how one result can be reinforced by another, a mutual strengthening that offers a synthetic and more comprehensive overview. Put differently, would have already noted Sonnenschein making this point in the very first paragraph of his paper. 4We return to this theorem below. It is perhaps worth reminding the reader that Nachbin's pioneering monograph is titled "Topology and Order;" see Ward (1954) and Bridges and Mehta (1995) for details. 5We need hardly remind the reader that finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces, the simplex of (objective) lotteries over a finite set, and infinite-dimensional topological vector spaces are some of the most obvious examples. 6Some would say that this is almost professional folk-wisdom still: see for example page 80 (last paragraph) in Gilboa (2009). 7By truncating Wakker's words as we do, we take them out of context; we return to them, and to Narens (1985), in Section 4 below. 3 can one ask for necessity results that move backward to connectedness? Indeed, inspite of his focus on the question of a numerical representation of a given preference relation over the choice space,8 Eilenberg had already furnished necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of topology that provided a simultaneous guarantee both of the connectedness of the choice set and the continuity of the relation defined over the set. And Sonnenschein's work can be seen as a further elaboration of this line of inquiry to a setting in which binary relations are unconstrained by Eilenberg's singleton indifference sets, a context of primary interest for microeconomic theory. And surely, the next step in the line of development is Sen's. Even though his primary emphasis is on choice functions and problems of social choice, his forensic examination of the transitivity postulate, one that abstains from topological considerations, draws on Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Lorimer as a subtext, and thereby leaves open the question as to the consequences of putting continuity considerations back in.9 In any case, a principal motivation behind this paper is to focus on this simultaneity: an inquiry that moves forward and backward in its investigation of not only what topological connectedness implies for a binary relation continuous in that topology, but also what is implied in its turn by the substantive properties of that class of relations. It is to focus on both directions of a two-way relationship between topological and order structures. As such, we refer to this investigation as the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein (ES) research program, recognizing that even though it is the forward (sufficiency) direction that is of primary interest to economists, and the backward (necessary) direction of primary interest to topologists, the four equivalence theorems that we present below are perhaps two sides of the same coin -- a productive two-way relationship in which assumptions on the choice set, and the objectives that are defined on that set, have strong and obvious implications for each other. Eilenberg saw this more than seventy-five years ago. In summary, without being overly pompous and pedantic, and motivated primarily to make an exploratory essay in pure theory10 reader-friendly, we list what we see to be the six contributions of this paper, and leave it to the reader to separate the primary from the secondary. 1. Gathering and connecting under one rubric the three foundational11 results enumerated above on how continuity and connectedness in a given topology logically link transitivity and completeness. 2. Remaining within the parametric ambit of these foundational results, a generalization of Eilenberg's theorem that non-triviality and no-indifference between distinct items imply both transitivity and completeness.12 3. Turning the foundational results around by asking for the type of topologies under which 8This aspect of Eilenberg's paper was taken up by Debreu (1954) and its extensive study now constitutes a rather rich history to which we shall briefly refer to in the sequel. 9There is some irony in that we extend Sen's work in a direction that he explicitly wanted to avoid. He criticizes the literature's "overwhelming concern with transitivity and continuity," and referring to his results, writes how they are "derived without any assumption of continuity and related conditions as these conditions might not be very realistic for certain problems of rational choice, especially in dealing with social decisions." 10We use the phrase "pure theory" in the Marshallian sense of the "The pure theory of international trade." 11This is nothing but a loose summary sentence of the ideas explicated in the four paragraphs above. We shall 12For a precise statement, see (a)⇒(b) in Theorem 1, and its detailed discussion encapsulated in Proposition 1 below. This may also be the place to note that Eilenberg's equivalence result is not parallel to ours and of a different nature. reserve the term 'foundational' for the results enumerated in the second paragraph above. 4 the logical implications on the binary relations hold, and providing complete answers. 4. Generalizing the collectivity of these results by deconstructing notions of transitivity, com- pleteness and connectedness, and establishing the tightness of these generalizations. 5. Investigating ancillary notions such as fragility, flimsiness and separability that fall within the ES program, even though not specifically related to transitivity and completeness. 6. Drawing the implications of the results for a variety of applied contexts under the headings of redundancy and hiddenness. Once the basic motivation of the paper is understood, and the results outlined, the pre- sentation of the rest of the paper follows rather naturally. Section 2 develops the basic notation and vocabulary of the subject and Section 3 presents the results in four subsections: the four equivalence theorems in the first three, and a sufficiency theorem that casts the results of Sen and Sonnenschein in the framework of incomplete preferences. The latter, and its affiliated propo- sition, while of interest for its own sake, also undergirds the proofs of the equivalence theorems that precede it. Section 4 is devoted to a somewhat hurried discussion and application of the results to a variety of applied registers. Section 5 recollects the strands already laid out in this introduction, and concludes with two observations for further work. Section 6 is devoted to the proofs. 2 Notational and Conceptual Preliminaries Let X be a set and a binary relation R on it as a subset R ⊂ X × X. We define = {y (x, y) ∈ R}, R(x) R−1(x) = {y (y, x) ∈ R}, = {(x, y) (y, x) ∈ R}, R−1 where R(x) denotes the upper section of R at x, R−1(x) the lower section of R at x and R−1 the transpose of R. Let ∆ = {(x, x)x ∈ X} and Rc the complement of R. We say that R has open (closed) sections if its upper and lower sections are open (closed) in the topology that X is endowed with. We call R continuous if its sections are closed and the sections of its asymmetric part P = R\R−1 are open. We shall also denote R by (cid:22), as is standard especially in the economics literature. The descriptive adjectives pertaining to a relation are presented in a tabular form for the convenience of the reader in Table 1 below. As is conventional, we denote the symmetric part of the binary relation R by I = R ∩ R−1 and its asymmetric part by P = R\R−1. In terms of Sen's (1969) felicitous notation, let PI be the containment P −1(x) × I(x) ⊂ P for all x ∈ X, IP the containment I−1(x) × P (x) ⊂ P for all x ∈ X. Note, for example, that PI amounts to the requirement that y ≺ x ∼ z implies y ≺ z and IP that y ∼ x ≺ z implies y ≺ z, where ∼ denotes the symmetric part of (cid:22) and ≺ its asymmetric part. We shall also use the abbreviations T, PP, II and NP, where the first three refer to the transitivity of R, P and I, respectively, and NP the negative transitivity of P. Definition 1. A binary relation is said to be semi-transitive if PI and IP hold. 5 reflexive complete symmetric asymmetric anti-symmetric non-trivial transitive negatively transitive Rc is transitive Relational notation Set-theoretic notation x (cid:22) x ∀x ∈ X ∆ ⊂ R x (cid:22) y or y (cid:22) x ∀x, y ∈ X X × X = R ∪ R−1 x (cid:22) y implies y (cid:22) x ∀x, y ∈ X R = R−1 x (cid:22) y implies y (cid:54)(cid:22) x ∀x, y ∈ X R ∩ R−1 = ∅ x (cid:22) y (cid:22) x implies x = y R ∩ R−1 ⊂ ∆ ∃x, y ∈ X such that x (cid:22) y and y (cid:14) x R\R−1 (cid:54)= ∅ R−1(y) × R(y) ⊂ R ∀y ∈ X x (cid:22) y (cid:22) z implies x (cid:22) z ∀x, y, z ∈ X x (cid:54)(cid:22) y (cid:54)(cid:22) z implies x (cid:54)(cid:22) z ∀x, y, z ∈ X Table 1: Properties of Binary Relations Definition 2. A topological space X is said to be connected if it is not the union of two non- empty, disjoint open sets. Equivalently, X is connected if the only subsets of X which are both open and closed are ∅ and X. The space X is disconnected if it is not connected. A subset of X is connected if it is connected as a subspace. All this is routine so far. We now break new ground by considering the concepts of k- connectedness of a set and k-nontriviality of a binary relation on that set.13 Definition 3. A component of a topological space is a maximal connected set in the space; that is, a connected subset which is not properly contained in any connected subset.14 For any natural number k, a topological space is k-connected if it has at most k components. The concept of k-connectedness provides a quantitative measure of the degree of disconnectedness of a topological space. Note also that it is an adjective for space, and not for the topology it is endowed with. It is also clear that 1-connectedness is equivalent to connectedness and that any k-connected space is l-connected for all l ≥ k. Next, we present a generalization of non-triviality. Definition 4. A binary relation R on a topological space X is componentwise non-trivial if (i) for any component C of X, there exists x, y ∈ C such that (x, y) ∈ P, (ii) for any distinct components C, C(cid:48) of X, there exist x ∈ C, y ∈ C(cid:48) such that (x, y) ∈ R∪R−1. It is easy to see that the concept requires strict comparability within the components and weak comparability across the components. We now give it a quantitative cast by presenting a formal definition of k-nontriviality. Definition 5. Let X be a topological space and {Cl}l∈L, L an arbitrary index set, denote its components. For any finite k ≤ L, we say that a binary relation R on X is k-non-trivial if there exist 1 ≤ m1 < ··· < mk ≤ k and 1 ≤ n1 < ··· < nk ≤ k such that for all i, j ≤ k, i < j, 13We do not mean to overemphasize the novelty: a cursory reference to Wilder (1949), or to Dugundji (1966), shows that spaces with finitely many components are well-known and studied extensively. The reader should beware, however, that k-connectedness is used in algebraic topology with a totally different meaning. 14There is the weaker concept of a quasi-component of a topological space. In a compact Hausdorff space, the two are identical; see Wilder (1949). Even though many economic settings assume the Hausdorff separation axiom, compactness may fail, like the consumption set of a consumer in a Walrasian economy. Hence, it may be of interest to see if the results in this paper generalize to quasi-components. 6 (a) there exists (x, y) ∈ Cmi × Cni such that (x, y) ∈ P ∪ P −1, (b) there exists (x, y) ∈ (Cmi × Cnj ) ∪ (Cmj × Cni) such that (x, y) ∈ R ∪ R−1. First, the elementary observation that in any space, non-triviality and 1-non-triviality of a binary relation are equivalent. Furthermore, for k-connected spaces, for all i ≤ k, k-non-triviality of a binary relation can be qualitatively conceived of as being componentwise non-trivial since mi = ni = i. Nevertheless, the concept is not straightforward, and it is worthwhile to discuss it in the context of simple examples: we illustrate 1-, 2- and 3-non-triviality in the context of a space with three components. Figure 1: k-nontriviality We first show that the relation Ra is 1-non-trivial. Example 1. In Figure 1, X = C1 ∪ C2 ∪ C3 is the union of three non-degenerate open intervals in the real line which is endowed with its standard topology. It is clear that C1, C2, C3 are the components of X. Panels (a), (b) and (c) of Figure illustrate three distinct binary relations Ra, Rb, Rc defined on X, with points labeled with a filled circle illustrating condition (a) of Definition 5, and the ones with an empty circle illustrating condition (b). Hence, Ra = Pa, Rb = Pb and Rc = Pc. We now turn the detailed explanation of each relation illustrated in the panels. In Definition 5, set k = 1, m1 = 2, n1 = 3. As illustrated, (x1, x2) ∈ Cm1 × Cn1. Since (x1, x2) ∈ Ra and (x2, x1) /∈ Ra, therefore (x1, x2) ∈ Pa. Therefore, condition (a) of the definition is satisfied. Condition (b) does not have any bite since there are no distinct i, j ≤ k = 1. In this example, it is clear that Rb = Pb. Set k = 2, m1 = 2, m2 = 3 and n1 = 1, n2 = 3. Since each of Cm1 × Cn1 and Cm2 × Cn2 contains a pair of strictly comparable alternatives, (x1, x2) and (y1, y2) respectively, Rb satisfies condition (a) of the Definition 5. The only i, j that satisfy i < j ≤ 2 are i = 1, j = 2. It follows from (z1, z2) ∈ Pb ∩ Cm2 × Cn1 that condition (b) also holds. Hence, Rb is 2-non-trivial. In this example, it is clear that Rc = Pc. Set k = 3. In this case, there exists only one ordering that satisfies 1 ≤ l1 < l2 < l3 ≤ 3 which is 1 < 2 < 3. Hence mi = ni = i for i = 1, 2, 3 in the definition above. Since for each i, each Ci contains a pair of strictly comparable points (one of (x1, x2), (y1, y2) and (z1, z2)), condition (a) of Definition 5 holds. For i = 1 < 2 = j, (t1, t2) ∈ Cmj , Cni, for i = 1 < 3 = j, (w1, w2) ∈ Cmi, Cnj and for i = 2 < 3 = j, (v1, v2) ∈ Cmi, Cnj . Therefore, condition (b) also holds. Example 1 is complete. Second, we show that the relation Rb is 2-non-trivial. Finally, we show that the relation Rc is 3-non-trivial. 7 C1C2C1C2(a) 1-non-trivialC3C3 (x1,x2)C1C2C3C1C2C3C1C2C3C1C2C3 (x1,x2) (y1,y2) (z1,z2) (x1,x2) (y1,y2) (z1,z2) (t1,t2) (v1,v2) (w1,w2)(b) 2-non-trivial(c) 3-non-trivial3 The Theory In this section, we present the six basic results of this paper along with two supplementary propositions. The first three subsections present equivalence results characterizing connected- ness and its natural generalizations; while the fourth is devoted to two sufficiency theorems. These two theorems set Sen's topologically-free results in a topological register, and elaborate Sonnenschein's invocation of the Phragmen-Brouwer (topological) property, all in the setting of incomplete preferences. These six theorems all have constitutive implications for what we are referring to as the ES research program.15 3.1 A General Result on k-Connectedness We now present our first equivalence theorem, deferring to the next subsection its relationship to the antecedent literature. Theorem 1. For any natural number k, the following statements are equivalent for a k-non- trivial and continuous binary relation defined on any topological space with at least k-components. (a) The space is k-connected. (b) Any transitive relation is complete. (c) Any anti-symmetric relation is complete. (d) Any relation whose symmetric part is transitive with connected sections, is complete. (e) Any semi-transitive relation with transitive symmetric part is complete. Even though Theorem 1 achieves a symbol-free and clear expression, a further discussion of it in terms of the vernacular used in the introduction may be worthwhile. But before that, note that the theorem works with a class of topologies, and that statement (a), together with the specification that the space has at least k-components, implies that the space has exactly k com- ponents. Moving on to the other assertions, under the topological specifications of connectedness and continuity, condition (b) asserts the impossibility of a consistent agent being indecisive, and condition (c) insists that she, when never indifferent between distinct items, must be decisive irrespective of being consistent or not. The third assertion drops consistency and adds extreme decisiveness regarding comparable items. Indeed, one can push the latter claim a little further. Even when she can "choose and not only pick"16 which is to say, when she has a fine enough taste to discriminate between distinct items and to be possibly indifferent among them (has possibly non-singleton transitive indifference classes), she must be consistent if these classes are either connected (condition (d)), or can be compared in the sense of being semi-transitive (con- dition (e)). As Figure 2 makes clear, there is a relationship of inclusion17 in terms of conditions (b) to (e) of Theorem 1; and so, at least as far as the forward direction from condition (a) is concerned, the statement (a)⇒(e) is all that needs to be shown. However, the very generality of condition (e) goes towards moving away from it when we consider the backward direction. 15In terms of a reader's guide, and especially for a first reading, one may read these theorems for the case k = 1, and instead of the full equivalence, even limit oneself to the forward direction as in the foundational papers. 16We are indebted to Ullman-Margalit and Morgenbesser (1977) for this terminological distinction; also taken up in Sen (1993), and under the heading of "the idea of internal consistency of choice," in Sen (2017, pp. 309-312). 17We shall return to this below in Proposition 2 and in Theorems 5 and 6. 8 The sets (b) -- (e) corresponds to the sets of binary relations which satisfy the assumptions of assertions (b) -- (e) of Theorem 1, respectively. In particular, the set (e) denotes the set of all k-non-trivial, semi-transitive and continuous binary relations R whose symmetric part I is transitive, (d) is the subset of (e) such that the sections of I are connected, (c) is the subset of (e) such that R is anti-symmetric and (b) is the subset of (e) such that R is transitive. Figure 2: The inclusion relationship between assertions (b) -- (e) of Theorem 1 3.2 Specializations: Connectedness and 2-Connectedness For the special cases of connected and 2-connected spaces, we have more interesting equivalence results. In terms of the forward direction, we not only obtain completeness but also transitivity for free! Theorem 2. For any natural number k ≤ 2, the following statements are equivalent for a k-non- trivial and continuous binary relation defined on any topological space with at least k-components. (a) The space is k-connected. (b) Any transitive relation is complete. (c) Any anti-symmetric relation is complete and transitive. (d) Any relation whose symmetric part is transitive with connected sections, is complete and transitive. (e) Any semi-transitive relation with a transitive symmetric part is complete and transitive. Thus, once we specialize to connectedness or to 2-connectedness, we can strengthen Theorem 1 to obtain consistency and decisiveness instead of only decisiveness. As already emphasized in the introduction, a simple gathering of the foundational results has led to an equivalence theorem, and thereby also to a characterization of connectedness and 2-connectedness of the choice set. In terms of the relationship of Theorem 2 to the antecedent literature, it takes a piecemeal treatment into a mutually reinforcing one, and thereby in indissolubly connecting the behavioral and mathematical registers, testifies to the analytical depth of the ES research program.18 Next, moving to a blow-by-blow account of a comparison with the theorems of Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Schmeidler, it is perhaps easiest to begin with the concept of semi-transitivity, 18We may point out here in anticipation that our joint treatment of these foundational results has also allowed us to provide alternative proofs of the results of Eilenberg and Sonnenschein. Our method of proof is inspired by Schmeidler, and is totally different compared to theirs; see this observation formally made in the paragraph preceding the proof of this theorem, and in the remark following it. 9 bcd(c)(b)(e)(d)pioneered, though not named as such,19 by Rader (1963, p. 232), and formally presented as Definition 1 above. He used it to present what he saw to be a "remarkable result, due, in essence to Eilenberg," and referred to it as a condition under which the choice set may be decomposed into indifference classes and that these classes may be compared as more or less preferable. No strict transitivity assumption is made, although two indifference classes are never allowed to be indifferent to each other. In the specialization of Theorem 2 to k = 1, note that (i) (a)⇒(e) drops the completeness and anti-symmetry assumptions of Eilenberg (1941, 2.1) and the completeness assumption of Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 3), weakens the transi- tivity assumption of Schmeidler (1971, Theorem); (ii) (a)⇒(d) drops the completeness and anti-symmetry assumptions of Eilenberg (1941, 2.1) and the completeness assumption of Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 4); (iii) (a)⇒(c) drops the completeness assumption of Eilenberg (1941, 2.1); (iv) (a)⇒(b) is due to Schmeidler (1971, Theorem). All this raises a larger point that some of the assumptions that we make salient are hidden in the statements of the theorems of Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Schmeidler. For example, Schmeidler's transitivity assumption already implies that the relation is semi-transitive and its symmetric part is transitive. As another example, Sonnenschein does not assume that the sym- metric part of a relation is transitive, but under the completeness assumption, this already follows from the relation itself being semi-transitive.20 The reader should also note that the theorem of Eilenberg, as well as that of Sonnenschein, does not assume non-triviality; but cases where non-triviality does not hold, yield trivialities in themselves.21 If the preference relation is trivial in Eilenberg's result, then the choice space can consist of at most one element. And in Sonnen- schein's result, it requires all elements to be indifferent to each other. In both cases, therefore, transitivity of the preference relation is equivalent to the transitivity of the indifference relation which is already assumed. This issue of hidden assumptions goes beyond these foundational papers,22 and in our consideration of other work, we shall return to this theme below in Section 4. Two final remarks concerning Theorem 2. First, assertions (c) -- (e) in Theorem 2 reproduce assertions (c) -- (e) in Theorem 1, but with the strengthened form that substitutes completeness and transitivity for completeness. The reader should note that this strengthening does not necessarily hold for k > 2. The following Example settles this issue. Example 2. Let X = (0, 1)∪(1, 2)∪(2, 3) and the topology is the Euclidean metric. Then, k = 3. Now let R be an anti-symmetric binary relation defined as follows: (x, y) ∈ R if x, y ∈ Ck, x ≤ y, if x ∈ (0, 1) and y ∈ (1, 2), if x ∈ (1, 2) and y ∈ (2, 3), and if x ∈ (2, 3) and y ∈ (0, 1). It is clear that R is complete and has closed sections. However, it is non-transitive. 19Note that the usage here differs from that of Houthakker's concept; see Sen (2017, pp. 94, 295-298, 299). 20On this, see Figure 2 and Proposition 2. These relationships are partially available in Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 3), Lorimer (1967, Theorem 2) and Sen (1969, Theorem I). 21We return to this in Section 4.1. 22To be sure, the discussion in this paragraph assumes k = 1; the foundational literature is silent on higher values of the natural number k. 10 Our second remark concerns assertion (b). Even though it already assumes transitivity and is included in Theorem 1, it does not mean it is redundant because of the basic issue of equivalence. In Theorems 1 and 2, the implication (a) ⇒ (b) is a literal rendering of Schmeidler's claim of completeness, in the case k = 1. Moreover, the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein claim of transitivity is ignored in this first result and bundled with completeness in the second. The question then arises as to whether there is an equivalence claim that is focused only on transitivity. This is to ask whether in assertions (c) -- (e) in Theorem 2, completeness can be shifted from the conclusion to the hypothesis. The answer is negative. In order to see this, let X = {0, 1} be endowed with a discrete topology. Then it is clear that X is disconnected and every binary relation on X has both closed and open sections, and is transitive. Therefore, even though connectedness of the space is a sufficient condition for the results of Eilenberg-Sonnenschein, it is not a necessary condition. However, in our simple example, the space is 2-connected, and this gives a hint that a version of Theorem 2 may be true for 2-connected spaces when the completeness of the relation is correspondingly shifted. It is indeed so, but involves a subtlety to which we turn next. As already emphasized in the introduction, Eilenberg's paper pioneered the question of the representation of a preferences relation on a set in terms of a real-valued function on the same set, but it also investigated the question of conditions under which a binary relation with attractive natural properties exists on the set.23 Introducing a notion of an ordered space as one that admits an anti-symmetric, complete, transitive and continuous relation, he presented the following result. A connected topological space X containing at least two elements can be ordered if and only if P (X) is disconnected, where P (X) consists of (x, y) ∈ X × X such that x (cid:54)= y. In the move to our next result, we introduce the following definition which drops the transitivity requirement in Eilenberg's (1941) characterization of an ordered space.24 Definition 6. A topological space is quasi-ordered if there exists an anti-symmetric, complete and continuous binary relation on it. We are now ready to state the third equivalence result of the paper. Theorem 3. The following statements are equivalent for a complete and continuous binary relation on any quasi-ordered topological space. (a) The space is 2-connected. (b) Any anti-symmetric relation is transitive. (c) Any relation whose symmetric part is transitive with connected sections, is transitive. (d) Any semi-transitive relation is transitive. 23We have already emphasized the first question in Footnote 4 and in Footnote 8, but what is being emphasized here is the existence of the relation rather than a function, a question that is taken up in the social choice literature; see Khan and Uyanık (2018) for an exploration of this question and an elaboration of this connection. At any rate, as we shall see, it is essential to the result we present below. 24The reader is again warned about the lack of a uniform terminology in the literature; see Sen (2017, p. 54). 11 The subtlety referred to above involves the restriction of the result to a quasi-ordered topological space. To begin with, note at the outset that the restriction is required only for the backward direction, and that to ensure that the assertions guaranteeing 2-connectedness are not vacuous, that there indeed exist binary relations satisfying the properties required of them. Eilenberg's theorem guarantees their existence in an ordered space, and a fortiori, in a quasi-ordered space. Note this is not an issue in Theorems 1 and 2 since we can construct a k-non-trivial continuous binary relation without any assumption on the topological space.25 Proposition 3 in Section 4 implies that the topology on a finite topological space with an anti-symmetric, complete and continuous binary relation (quasi-order) has to be discrete. This shows that there does not exist a quasi-order on any finite topological space which is not discrete. We next illustrate an example of such a topological space which has three components. On this space there does not exist a quasi-order, hence it is vacuously true that any quasi-order is transitive. But the space is not 2-connected. Example 3. Let X = {x, y, z, w} and the collection {∅,{x},{y},{z, w}} is a basis for the topology defined on X. For any complete and anti-symmetric binary relation R on X, either (z, w) ∈ P , or (w, z) ∈ P , where P is the asymmetric part of R. Then, either w ∈ P (z), or w ∈ P −1(z). Note that z /∈ P (z) ∪ P −1(z) by definition. Then, either P (z), or P −1(z) contains w but excludes z. Since continuity of R requires P has open sections, any complete and anti-symmetric relation on X cannot be continuous. For an example of a general topological space, we know by Proposition 3 that there does not exist a quasi-order on any non-Hausdorff topological space. Such examples are analogous to the one above. And while we are on the asymmetry between Theorem 3 and the the preceding Theorems 1 and 2, let us also note that for a symmetrical treatment, we can simply include assertion (b) in the theorem by specifying attention to 2-non-trivial binary relations, and taking the requirement of completeness down to the other assertions.26 In Theorem 3, the statements (a) ⇒ (b), (c), (d) are generalizations of Schmeidler (1971, Theorem), Eilenberg (1941, 2.1) and Sonnenschein (1965, Theorems 4 and 3) to 2-connected spaces, respectively.27 For the reader's convenience, Table 2 summarizes the statements of Theorems 1 -- 2 as well as those of Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Schmeidler which are listed in Theorem 3. Lorimer (1967) claims that Sonnenschein's theorems are not really theorems of topology, In his but theorems of set theory that can be proved by set-theoretic considerations alone. reply to Lorimer, Sonnenschein (1967) provides a version of assertion (a) ⇔ (d) of Theorem 3 for subsets of the real line in order to highlight the necessity of connectedness. Sonnenschein also adds that Lorimer's conditions "would have been very unnatural and generally of little 25This construction is illustrated in the backward direction of the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2; see the penul- timate paragraph of the proof of Theorem 1 presented below. As regards Theorem 2, the cases k = 1 and k = 2 are considered separately; see the last paragraph of the proof in each case. 26We do not do this because Theorem 3 is primarily motivated by the transitivity claim of Eilenberg- Sonnenschein. 27We present here a slightly stronger version of Sonnenschein's theorems in order to underscore the comparison. He assumes the connectedness of X\I instead of connectedness of X. It is easy to prove a version of our results under this assumption. A result similar to Sonnenschein's theorem is provided by Rader (1963, Lemma) under a stronger connectedness assumption which requires the upper sections of the weak preference relation to be connected. 12 X : (2-)connected k-connected Eil Son Sch T1(b) T1(c) T1(d) T1(e) T2(c) T2(d) T2(e) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) R : complete × × × transitive (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) semi-transitive × (cid:88) × anti-symmetric (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) continuous (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (2-)non-trivial∗ × × × k-non-trivial (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) connected sections (cid:88) × × × (cid:88) × × (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × × (cid:88) × × (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) × × (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × I : transitive × (cid:88) × × × × (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × × (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) × × × × (cid:88) (cid:88) × (cid:88) (cid:88) In this table, if one property directly follows from the other assumed properties, then we mark it as (cid:88). For example, Eilenberg's theorem assume the preference relation is complete and anti-symmetric, which directly imply semi-transitivity of the preference relation along with the transitivity of its symmetric part. Hence we mark that these two additional properties are also assumed. * Even though theorems of Eilenberg and Sonnenschein do not assume (2)-non-triviality, without this assumption their results become triviality, see Section 3.2 for details. Table 2: Comparison of the Results use in economic applications." The point is that Eilenberg and Sonnenschein use continuity and connectedness assumptions at a crucial step in their results, and Lorimer simply assumes that that step holds in order to eliminate the topological register and thereby limit himself "solely" to a set-theoretic one.28 Along this line of investigation, Eilenberg (1941, 8.1) and Ward (1954, Theorem 5) provided results on the necessity of topological connectedness by using order-structure properties. However, their results are partial. Next, to allow the reader some breathing space, and to compare what we have achieved so far relative to the three foundational results laid out in the introduction, we summarize the results obtained from the forward direction of the three theorems: a sufficient condition for completeness and transitivity of a binary relation defined on an arbitrary topological space. The essential idea has little need of the index k for its articulation, and hence attests to the fact that the forward direction is true for any topological space. Proposition 1. Every componentwise non-trivial, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on a topological space, whose symmetric part is transitive, is complete. If the topological space has at most two components, then the binary relation is also transitive. This proposition shows that if there are comparable alternatives within and across components, then all alternatives are comparable. The proof of the necessity of completeness follows from the proof of Theorem 1 since its proof requires only componentwise non-triviality and does 28It should be noted, however, that Lorimer also shows that these conditions are not only sufficient for transi- tivity of a complete relation, but also necessary, and hence there is something extra and of consequent use in his paper. 13 not hinge on the finiteness of the number of components. The necessity of transitivity follows from Theorem 2. Moreover, Theorem 2(d) implies that semi-transitivity can be substituted with further topological assumptions on the binary relation; see Section 3.4 below for details, in particular Theorems 5 and 6. 3.3 A Return to Connectedness A natural question to ask at this stage is how Theorem 2 can be further sharpened if we limit ourselves to the setting original to the foundational papers. This is to say, to 1-connectedness of the topological space. This, by necessity, brings us to current work, and allows a re-framing and a generalization of it.29 Towards this end, we begin with a stronger non-triviality concept. Definition 7. A binary relation R on a set X is called strongly non-trivial if there exists x ∈ X such that P (x) (cid:54)= ∅, and R(x(cid:48)) ∩ R(y(cid:48)) (cid:54)= ∅ for all x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ P (x). In terms of relational notation, strong non-triviality amounts to the requirement that (i) there exist x, y ∈ X with x ≺ y, and that (ii) for all x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ X with x ≺ x(cid:48) and x ≺ y(cid:48), there exists z ∈ X such that x(cid:48) ≺ z and y(cid:48) ≺ z. It is not surprising that weakening the continuity assumptions in the hypothesis of Theo- rems 1 to 3 falsifies their conclusions. In order to elaborate on this, we consider the concept of fragility due to Gerasimou (2013), and supplement it by a parallel concept of flimsiness: both are useful for the analysis of the structure of the preferences under weaker continuity assump- tions. The first assumes that every neighborhood of some strictly comparable alternatives of a non-trivial binary relation on the choice space contains non-comparable alternatives, Gerasimou (2013, p. 161) motivates his concept as follows: From a normative point of view, fragility of a preference relation is an undesirable property, both when this preference relation is that of an individual and also when it represents the preferences over social alternatives. Indeed, one would expect that when decision makers express strict preference for one alternative over another, marginal changes in these two alternatives should not result in them becoming incomparable. If they do, then doubt should perhaps be cast on the validity of the strict-preference comparison between the original alternatives. Finally, introspection and casual empiricism do not seem favorable for the property's descriptive accuracy either. Definition 8. We call a binary relation R on a topological space X fragile if there exist x, y ∈ X such that (i) (x, y) ∈ P, and that (ii) any open neighborhood of (x, y) contains (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) such that (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) /∈ R ∪ R−1. In terms of relational notation, fragility amounts to the requirement that (i) there exists x, y ∈ X with x ≺ y, and that (ii) any open neighborhood of (x, y) contains (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) such that x(cid:48) (cid:14) y(cid:48) and y (cid:14) x(cid:48). Next, we provide a definition which complements fragility. 29We are primarily motivated by forging connections to current work; there is little doubt that results of several of the papers that we connect to can be generalized to the setting of k-connected sets for any natural number k, and thereby to reformulate the theorem presented below along the lines of Theorem 1. 14 Definition 9. A binary relation R on a topological space X is flimsy if there exist x, y ∈ X with (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1 such that every open neighborhood of (x, y) contains (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R ∪ R−1. In terms of relational notation, flimsiness amounts to the requirement that there exists x, y ∈ X with x (cid:14) y and y (cid:14) x such that every open neighborhood of (x, y) contains (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) with x(cid:48) (cid:22) y(cid:48) or y(cid:48) (cid:22) x(cid:48). Gerasimou (2013, Corollary 3) showed that every incomplete, non-trivial and transitive binary relation with closed sections defined on a connected topological space, is fragile. Therefore, dropping one of the continuity assumption of Schmeidler's theorem yields an undesirable case of incompleteness from the normative point of view. We show that his result is equivalent to topological connectedness of the space. And we supplement his result by other affiliated concepts; but before turning to them, we recall for the reader three ways of taking an asymmetric relation and associating its reflexive hull with it. Definition 10. For any asymmetric binary relation P on a topological space X, define its re- −1 = {(x, y) (y, x) /∈ P}. Moreover, define the lower covering relation flexive hull as R = (P c) R(cid:96) of R and its upper covering30 relation Ru as follows: R(cid:96) = {(x, y) R−1(x) ⊂ R−1(y)} and Ru = {(x, y) R(y) ⊂ R(x)}, We call the pair (R(cid:96), Ru) the covering relations of R. In terms of relational notation, the reflexive hull of an asymmetric relation ≺ is defined as follows: x (cid:22) y if and only if x ⊀ y. The lower covering relation (cid:22)(cid:96) of (cid:22) and its upper covering relation (cid:22)u are defined as follows: x (cid:22)(cid:96) y if and only if z (cid:22) x implies z (cid:22) y, and x (cid:22)u y if and only if y (cid:22) z implies x (cid:22) z. Finally, we present two additional concepts due to Chateauneuf (1987), the second being his strengthening of the standard notion of a separable relation. Definition 11. Let P be an asymmetric binary relation P on a topological space X and R = (P c) −1 denote its reflexive hull. Then, (also with relational notation in braces), (i) R is called pseudo-transitive if (x, x(cid:48)) ∈ P, (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R and (y(cid:48), y) ∈ P imply (x, y) ∈ P for all x, y, x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ X, (x ≺ x(cid:48) (cid:22) y(cid:48) ≺ y implies x ≺ y). (ii) P is called separable if there exists a countable subset A of X such that (x, y) ∈ P im- plies there exists x(cid:48) ∈ A such that (x, x(cid:48)) ∈ P and (x(cid:48), y) ∈ P , (x ≺ y implies ∃x(cid:48) ∈ A such that x ≺ x(cid:48) ≺ y). (iii) P is called strongly separable if there exists a countable subset A of X such that (x, y) ∈ P implies there exist x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ A such that (x, x(cid:48)) ∈ P, (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R and (y(cid:48), y) ∈ P, (x ≺ y implies ∃x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ A such that x ≺ x(cid:48) (cid:22) y(cid:48) ≺ y). (iv) P has a continuous dual-representation if there exist two continuous real valued functions u and v on X such that (x, y) ∈ P if and only if u(x) < v(y) for all x, y ∈ X, (x ≺ y if and only if u(x) < v(y).) 30These "covering" type of derived relations have important applications and implications in decision theory as well as in social choice theory. In particular, they have been used for the numerical representation of incomplete preferences; see for example Chateauneuf (1987) for representation of interval orders, and Peleg (1970) and Galaabaatar and Karni (2013) for expected utility representation of incomplete preferences. In social choice theory, the "covering relation" has been used since mid-twentieth century; see Duggan (2013) for a comprehensive survey on covering relation. 15 We can now present our final equivalence theorem. Theorem 4. The following statements are equivalent for a binary relation defined on any quasi- ordered topological space which contains more than two elements. (a) The space is connected. (b) Any strongly non-trivial and transitive relation with closed upper sections, and whose asym- metric part is negatively transitive with open upper sections, is complete and continuous. (c) Any two anti-symmetric, non-trivial and continuous relations on X are either identical or inverse to each other. (d) Any incomplete, non-trivial and transitive relation with closed sections, is fragile. (e) Any incomplete, non-trivial and transitive relation whose asymmetric part has open sec- tions, is flimsy. (f) Any asymmetric relation with a continuous dual-representation is strongly separable. (g) Any asymmetric relation has a continuous dual-representation if and only if it is strongly separable, its dual is pseudo-transitive and its covering relations have closed sections. Note that unlike Theorems 1 to 3, continuity of the given relation is not a standing hy- pothesis for Theorem 4, and thus the theorem can be read as an attempt to deconstruct the continuity postulate. When we substitute the strong form of transitivity for continuity, we al- most necessitate continuity. Again, the quasi-order assumption is only used in the proof of the implication (c) ⇒ (a). The statement (a)⇒(c) in the above theorem generalizes Eilenberg (1941, Theorem II) by dropping completeness and transitivity; and the statements (a)⇒(d), (a)⇒(f) and (a)⇒ (g) are due to Gerasimou (2013, Corollary 3) and Chateauneuf (1987, Fundamental Lemma and Theorem), respectively. The statement (a)⇒(b) shows that the continuity assumption in Theorem 2 can be weakened by strengthening the non-triviality assumption. Note that even though we did not explicitly assume negative transitivity in Theorem 2, it follows from Theorem 5(a) that the assumptions of the hypothesis of the theorem imply that P is negatively transitive. We conclude this section with the elementary observation that Theorems 2 and 4 can be collapsed into a single portmanteau result characterizing topological connectedness. Such a portmanteau theorem, on its own, or in conjunction with Theorems 1 and 3, can perhaps be read as an up-to-date survey of the two-way relationship brought to light by topological assumptions on the binary relation and the set over which it is defined.31 3.4 Sen's Deconstruction of the Transitivity Postulate The results presented in this section can be introduced in two alternative ways: (i) as an answer to questions that are naturally raised by the four equivalence theorems presented above, or (ii) as a generalization of Sen's (1969) non-topological rendering of the results of Sonnenschein to the topological register. In terms of the first, let us consider what Theorems 1 to 4 bring to the table in terms of giving an underlying basis for the transitivity postulate. As already noted, Theorem 31We return to this issue in Section 5 below; see Footnote 56, and the text it footnotes. 16 1 is primarily concerned with completeness, and Theorem 4 with separability, fragility, and flimsiness. Theorem 2 does offer transitivity as a conclusion but bundles it with completeness, while Theorem 3 uses completeness of the relation as a hypothesis. Natural questions then arise as to whether the dual conclusion can be unbundled, whether the completeness hypothesis can be dispensed with, and whether the role of connectedness pinned down. In short, this is to ask for some sort of minimal setting under which transitivity obtains, and consistency is minimally unencumbered by decisiveness? Theorems 5 and 6 below respond to these questions.32 But an alternative presentation of our results can be furnished in terms of what we are referring to as Sen's deconstruction of the transitivity postulate. Towards this end, we refer the reader back to Sen's notation for the six different transitivity concepts T, NP, II, PP, IP, PI, already presented in Section 2. Referring to two transitivity conditions as independent if there exists a relation which satisfies one and not the other, and interdependent otherwise, Sen (1969) has offered a non-topological examination of the transitivity postulate. In his Theorem I, he provides a synthetic treatment of the interdependence between the various transitivity conditions when the underlying primitive binary relation is complete;33 see his Figure 1, also reproduced in Sen (2017, p. 66), and as Figure 3(b) below. Under completeness of R, which Sen assumed, PP and any one of PI, IP and II imply T, as the reader can see from Theorem 3b.34 The point of departure for our results is how Figure 3(b) unravels without the completeness postulate on R (see Figure 3(a)), and how most of these interdependence relations can be recovered, and new relationships emerge, if the underlying space and the preference relation is assumed to satisfy some suitable topological properties. As such, this inquiry falls very much within the ES program, and in this subsection we provide its elaboration in this direction.35 We begin with the following. Proposition 2. For any binary relation R on a set containing at least four elements, and with I and P denoting its symmetric and asymmetric parts, the following statements are valid. (a) T ⇔ PP ∧ PI ∧ IP ∧ II. (b) NP ⇒ PP ∧ PI ∧ IP . (c) T is independent of NP . 32Since we exclusively work with a topological structure, we do not investigate the implications of the added assumptions related to linear structure on the ES program. Uzawa (1960) pioneered this line of research by showing that convexity of a complete preference relation defined on a convex subset of a topological vector space with closed upper sections and a transitive asymmetric part implies that the relation itself is transi- tive. This result is reproduced and generalized by Sonnenschein (1965, Theorems 5 and 6) and picked up by Galaabaatar, Khan, and Uyanık (2018). 33Note that to say that the symmetric part of a relation is complete renders the relation trivial, whereas to say that the asymmetric part is complete furnishes the contradiction that an element of the space is preferred to itself. In Sen (1969), PP is the crucial transitivity condition and he found it convenient to give it a more usable name: "quasi-transitivity". In this connection, also see the subject index in Sen (2017) for additional discussion of his named concept. 34For example, to see PP and IP imply T from Figure 3(b), simply note that PP and II imply PI, which combined with PP then implies T. And so on for the other implications. 35There is a rich philosophical literature on the discussion of non-transitivity, already referred to in Foot- note 35. One may add that Tullock (1964) defends transitivity by using simple logical arguments and criticizes the experiments which argue evidence against transitivity. Anand (1993) criticizes Tullock for not considering ternary relation; also see also Luce (1956), Fishburn (1970) and Eliaz and Ok (2006). 17 (d) any subcollection of PP, PI, IP, II is independent of the remaining collection, severally and collectively. Proposition 2 implies that, in the absence of completeness, four of the transitivity conditions, PP, IP, PI and II, are independent of each other, severally and collectively; and T is independent of NP. Therefore, the relationship between different transitivity concepts that Sen illustrates falls apart without the completeness assumption. We now turn to showing that under suitable topological conditions, PI together with IP play an essential role for the completeness and the transitivity of R, and are thereby led to the notion of "semi-transitivity".36 But before the formalities, we present a picture of the interde- pendence between the transitivity conditions without referring to the completeness assumption. Panel (a) of Figure 3 illustrates the interdependence between different transitivity conditions for an arbitrary preference relation; panel (b) (as already mentioned above) illustrates the relation- ship under the completeness assumption; panel (c) remains with the incompleteness assumption but introduces continuity and connectedness assumptions; panel (d) includes completeness as well as continuity and connectedness assumptions. Label CC denotes that the underlying space is connected and that the binary relation defined on it is continuous. Label CIC keeps the con- tinuity assumption of CC and replaces the connectedness of the space with the connectedness of the sections of the symmetric part of the binary relation. To be sure, transitivity and com- pleteness are totally different conditions and completeness has implications on transitivity, but what our result brings out is that transitivity has implication for completeness. As an example, negative transitivity of ≺ is equivalent to the following: if x ≺ y, then z ≺ y or x ≺ z for all z in the space. This conditions puts a limit on the level of incompleteness of the relation.37 Theorems 5 and 6 presented below are an attempt to identify the most parsimonious setting to obtain transitivity, one that has no reference to completeness at all. As alluded to in the beginning of this subsection, they are the next step from the point where Theorems 1 to 4 have brought us. They extract what all can be said about transitivity without any other considerations: suitable topological assumptions on the choice set and on the preferences defined on it, allow us to both reconstruct some of these relationships and also bring new ones to light. But in their single-minded concern with the postulate of transitivity, as in Eilenberg (1941), Sonnenschein (1965, 1967) and Sen (1969), one of our findings, through decisive counterexamples, is that equivalence has to be necessarily jettisoned. As Proposition 1 above, they limit themselves only to the forward direction. Theorem 5. For any continuous binary relation R on a topological space, with I and P denoting its symmetric and asymmetric parts, the following statements are valid. (a) If the space is connected, then (i) semi-transitivity of R is equivalent to negative transitivity of P (PI ∧ IP ⇔ NP ), (ii) semi-transitivity of R implies transitivity of P (PI ∧ IP ⇒ PP ), (iii) transitivity of R implies negative transitivity of P (T ⇒ NP ), (iv) transitivity of R is equivalent to its semi-transitivity and transitivity of I (T ⇔ PI∧IP∧II). 36We warn the reader of the difference in terminology; see Footnore 19 above. 37As we shall have occasion to see below, all this supports the quotation from Wakker in the next section about the importance of judging the conditions in combination. 18 Figure 3: The Interdependence of Different Transitivity Conditions (b) If the sections of I are connected, then (i) transitivity of I implies semi-transitivity of R (II ⇒ PI ∧ IP ), (ii) transitivity of R is equivalent to transitivity of P and of I (T ⇔ PP ∧ II). Theorem 5(a) illustrates the essentially of semi-transitivity by showing that a continuous and semi-transitive relation defined on a connected space implies PP and NP . Whereas Theorem 5(b) illustrates the essentially of the transitivity of I by showing that for any continuous relation whose I has connected sections, II implies semi-transitivity. Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 4) uses connectedness of the sections of the indifference relation in order to obtain semi-transitivity of a complete and continuous relation whose symmetric part is transitive. All in all, Theorem 5 provides a complete picture of the relationship between different transitivity conditions with- out using the completeness of the relation. This is all to say that under suitable topological assumptions, the transitivity of I implies the remaining transitivity conditions. A natural question arises regrading the backward direction, and hence the possibility of equivalence. Such an equivalence can be written in two parts, one for the setting where X is connected, and the other when for the sections of I are connected. The following simple example suggests that both are false. Example 4. Assume X = {a, b} is endowed with the discrete topology. Then any relation is continuous and satisfy all of the six transitivity properties we use except T and II. Hence conditions (i) to (iii) in part (a) hold. It follows from PP, IP and PI hold for any relation on X that T is equivalent to II, hence condition (iv) holds. However, it is clear that X is disconnected. 19 TNPPPPIIIIP(b)TNPPPPIIIIP(a)TNPPPPIIIIP(c)CCCCCICCICTNPPPPIIIIP(d)CICCCCCCCCICCICThe statement of the converse related to the sections of I needs some elaboration. We can state the equivalence theorem for this part as follows: "For any continuous binary relation R on a topological space, the sections of its I are connected if and only if R satisfies (i) and (ii)." The relation I = X 2 satisfies both conditions, however its sections are disconnected. We now move on to the formalities required for the formulation of our interdependence result, and follow Sonnenschein (1965) in invoking two additional concepts: path-connectedness and the so-called Phragmen-Brouwer property, henceforth PBP. To be sure, Theorem 5 above also connects to both Theorems 3 and 4 (without the completeness assumption of course) of Sonnenschein. In his Theorem 7, Sonnenschein (1965) uses path-connectedness of the upper sections of the relation in order to obtain semi-transitivity of a complete and continuous relation with a transitive symmetric part defined on a topological space with the PBP. Theorem 6, like Theorem 5, provides a complete picture of the relationship between different transitivity conditions without using the completeness of the relation. Note that unlike Sonnenschein, we assume both upper and lower sections of the relation are path-connected. When a relation is complete, IP and PI are equivalent. It is easy to see that path-connectedness of the upper sections implies the latter property, but we need it for the lower sections to establish the former. Noting that an "example of a class of sets for which the PBP holds is the collection of all convex sets in Euclidean n-space," Sonnenschein nevertheless proves a special case of his result that "does not rely on the rather deep PBP."38 A comprehensive discussion of the PBP, a property nothing if not elusive, is furnished in Wilder (1949, Chapter II.4), and we refer the reader to it.39 For the purposes of this work we shall make do with the following definitions. Definition 12. We call two non-empty subsets A, B of a topological space X separated if ¯A∩B = ∅ = A ∩ ¯B. We say that a set A ⊂ X separates x from y if x and y lie in different components of X\A. We say that X has Phragmen-Brouwer property if for all separated open sets A, B ⊂ X and all x ∈ A, y ∈ B, there exists a connected subset of X\(A ∪ B) which separates x and y. A path in A ⊂ X is a continuous function s : [0, 1] → A, where [0, 1] is endowed with the usual topology. A set B ⊂ X is path-connected if for all x, y ∈ B there exists a path s : [0, 1] → B such that s(0) = x, s(1) = y. The following example illustrates a subset of Euclidean space which does not have the PBP. It is well-known that in addition to a convex subset, the Euclidean n-sphere, n > 1 satisfies this property, and so by necessity, our example is based on n = 1. Example 5. Let X = {x ∈ R2x2 2 = 1} be endowed with the usual Euclidean topology. Let x, y be two distinct points in X. Let A and B be the two components of X\{x, y}. Then A and B are separated open sets. However, any connected subset of the subspace {x, y} does not separate any a ∈ A and b ∈ B. 38See Sonnenschein (1965, Footnote 4 and Theorem 7A) where the alterantive proof of the special case is 1 + x2 justified on the grounds of furnishing "an interesting technique." 39 See, in particular, (Wilder, 1949, Theorems 4:12 and 9.3); also Dickman Jr. (1984), Brown (2006), Brown and Camarena (2015) and their references for modern work on the property. Note that the PBP is not a strengthening of the connectedness assumption since any space with the discrete topology satisfies it, but rather a different separation property. 20 With all the preliminaries behind us, we can finally present the result showing that the connect- edness of the sections of I in Theorem 5(b) can be replaced by the assumptions that R has path connected sections and that the space has PB property. Theorem 6. Let X be a topological space with the Phragmen-Brouwer property. Then for any continuous binary relation R on it, with I and P denoting its symmetric and asymmetric parts, the following statements are valid.40 (i) If R has path-connected upper sections, then transitivity of I implies PI (II ⇒ PI). (ii) If R has path-connected lower sections, then transitivity of I implies IP (II ⇒ IP ). (iii) If R has path-connected sections, then transitivity of R is equivalent to transitivity of P and of I (T ⇔ PP ∧ II). Again, a natural question arises regarding the backward direction, and hence the possibility of equivalence. We can formulate an equivalence conjecture as follows: "A topological space has the PBP if and only if any continuous binary relation R on it satisfies (i) to (iii)." Unlike connectedness, working with a topology with a lot of open sets will not yield a counterexample to PBP; in fact we have to work with a topology with few open sets. But we cannot also work with a very poor topology in order to obtain a counterexample to the property since there may not be enough separated sets. In any case, the following example shows that the converse of Theorem 6 is false. Example 6. Let X = {a, b, c, d} be the choice set which is endowed with the topology τ = {∅,{a},{c},{a, c},{a, b, c},{a, c, d}, X}. Note that {a} and {c} are separated open sets. Moreover, {b, d} is disconnected and {a, b, c},{a, c, d}, X are connected. Then any connected subset of {b, d} does not separate a and b. Therefore, X does not have the Phragmen-Brouwer property. Next, we show that any continuous binary relation R on X satisfies conditions (i) to (iii) of Theorem 6. Note that if we prove conditions (i) and (ii), then Proposition 2 implies condition (iii). To this end, assume that the symmetric part of the relation is transitive. We first show that path- connectedness of the upper sections of R implies that PI holds. Note that the collection of closed sets in X is {∅,{b},{d},{b, d},{b, c, d},{a, b, d}, X}. It is easy to show that among the closed sets, only {b, d} is not path-connected. Therefore, the upper sections of R must belong to the collection {∅,{b},{d},{b, c, d},{a, b, d}, X}. Since I(x) = R(x)∩R−1(x) for all x ∈ X and R has closed sections, therefore I(x) belongs to the collection {∅,{b},{d},{b, d},{b, c, d},{a, b, d}, X} for all x ∈ X. Note that all members of this collection is connected except {b, d}. Then for any relation R on X with I(x) (cid:54)= {b, d} for all x ∈ X, it follows from Theorem 5(b) that R is semitransitive, hence condition (i) holds. We now show that if a continuous binary relation R on X has path-connected upper sections and a transitive symmetric part, then I(x) (cid:54)= {b, d} for all x ∈ X. Assume that for some R there exists x ∈ X such that I(x) = {b, d}. Then the transitivity of I implies that x = b or x = d. Let x = b. Since R(b) is closed, path-connected and {b, d} ⊂ R(b), therefore R(b) 40In a connected and locally connected space, path-connectedness of the sections of a complete relation R implies that I has connected sections. Moreover, connectedness of the sections of I in a connected space implies that R has connected sections, which is weaker than path-connectedness. See Wilder (1949, Theorem 4.5 on p. 49 and Theorem 9.9 on p. 20) for the proofs. 21 is equal to one of {b, c, d},{a, b, d} and X. Let R(b) = {b, c, d}. Then it follows from R has closed sections and I(b) = {b, d} that R−1(b) is equal to either {b, d} or {a, b, d}. In both cases, P (b) = {c}. Since b ∈ P −1(c) and P has open sections, therefore P −1(c) must contain c, which furnishes us a contradiction. Now let R(b) = {a, b, d}. Then R−1(b) is equal to either {b, d} or {b, c, d}. In both cases, P (b) = {a}. Since b ∈ P −1(a) and P has open sections, therefore P −1(a) must contain a, which furnishes us a contradiction. Finally, let R(b) = X. Then R−1(b) = {b, d}. Hence, P (b) = {a, c}. Since b ∈ P −1(a) and P has open sections, therefore P −1(a) must contain a, which furnishes us a contradiction. Therefore, x (cid:54)= b. Analogously, the case x = d yields contradiction. An analogous argument shows that path-connectedness of the lower sections of R implies that IP holds. Therefore, the example is complete. Theorems 5 and 6 are in-line with the four theorems we present in the previous section. In the forward direction of those theorems we show that under suitable topological assumptions on the choice space and the preferences defined on it, non-triviality and weak forms of transitivity imply full transitivity as well as the completeness of the preferences. The proposition above and these two theorems present the relationship among different transitivity conditions without referring to the completeness assumption. In particular, assertions (a) and (b) in Theorem 5 are analogous to assertions (e) and (d) of Theorems 1 and 2 above. We conclude this section by observing that Theorems 5 and 6 have implications for the topological structure of the graph of a binary relation. A binary relation P on X is said to have open graph if P is open in the product topology on X × X. Bergstrom, Parks, and Rader (1976, Theorem 2 and Corollary) proved that an asymmetric and negatively transitive binary relation on a topological space has open sections if and only if it has open graph. The two theorems above show that we can weaken negative transitivity by strengthening the topological assumptions on preferences and on the space.41 4 Applications of the Theory: A Brief Excursus Results in pure theory are to be judged not only for their application to real-world problems, but also by new light they cast on the earlier theoretical results themselves: they allow, indeed enable and empower, one to really see what was already seen before. In this section, we do this through the help of two lenses: redundancy and hiddenness of hypotheses in a rather extensive antecedent literature. The postulates of completeness and transitivity serve as hypotheses to conclusions concerning results (i) on the representation of a preference relation by a real-valued (utility) function, (ii) in neoclassical consumer theory, (iii) in Walrasian and Cournot-Nash equilibrium theory, and (iv) in social choice theory; and it stands to reason that our six results and the examples would have some impact on these results. Redundancy, the removal of hypotheses unnecessary for a conclusion, is simply bringing Occam's razor into play, a procedure with a long and rich lineage in mathematical investigation. It goes into what one means by generalizing a theorem. Hiddenness is somewhat more subtle, and more far-reaching. Rather then saying that a hypothesis can be eliminated from an assertion, it says that it is already incorporated in other 41Gerasimou (2015) shows that reflexive, transitive and additive binary relation with closed upper sections has a closed graph, and hence, convexity of a relation has implications on its continuity; see Footnote 32 for further references and discussion on convexity. 22 hypotheses already assumed. We say that a particular assumption is hidden in a theorem when it is already implied by the others in the battery of assumptions constituting the hypothesis of the theorem. As such, showing that it can be removed does not lead to a generalization of the result, but merely to obtaining its clearer formulation and a more parsimonious expression. But it also includes making an implicit assumption or drawing out its fuller meaning of an assumption in the sense of uncovering the implications that are hidden in it.42 In this section, we work this distinction though the antecedent literature listed above. With this background we return to Wakker's (1988a) assertion that technical assumptions by themselves "do not entail obscurity and are not very bothersome." His text continues beyond our truncated citation. However, when one requires a list of conditions, then one should not judge each condition separately, but one should judge the conditions in combination. We give an example where, paradoxically, each individual condition involved is not falsified by the observations, but the combination of the conditions is falsified. As it turns out in this example, continuity, in the presence of other conditions, may have empirical meaning.43 It is very bothersome that usually the exact empirical meaning of simplifying non-necessary conditions such as continuity is unclear. However, rather than Wakker's example, focus simply on a decision-maker with a choice set of R+, and who, when faced with the options {0, 1}, {1, 2}, and {2, 0}, chooses 1, 2 and 0 respectively. Since his choices do not falsify anti-symmetry and non-triviality, and, irrespective of the number of additional but finite observations, cannot falsify continuity and exhibit non-transitivity, an appeal to the implication (a)⇒(c) in Theorem 2, and a presumption of anti-symmetry would falsify continuity. And this is all that is being asserted about continuity, in the presence of other conditions, having both behavioral and empirical implications. Finally, before taking our theorems to the antecedent literature, we take notice of three rather current references that engage with Schmeidler's theorem in directions somewhat oblique to ours. Gorno (2018, Proposition 10) presents a result that Schmeidler's theorem as a spe- cial case, but rather than the necessity and sufficiency of the property, resets it on maxi- mal (cid:23)-domains, maximal on which the relation is complete. In a somewhat similar vein, Cerreia-Vioglio and Ok (2018) work on the structure of an incomplete and non-transitive pref- erence relation by identifying and examining the properties of largest transitive sub-relation of it. They assume partial continuity of the relation, and are well aware that full continuity would otherwise imply completeness. However, they make no connection to the work of Eilenberg, Sonnenschein and Sen. Nishimura and Ok (2018) work with a preference structure consisting of two relations, one transitive but incomplete and the other complete but non-transitive. In this interesting paper, they redo notions of maximality, social choice and decision theory. It would be interesting to see whether the results reported above have any relevance to these lines of work. 42A celebrated example of the former is Malinvaud (1952); also see Footnote 51 below. An example of the latter is a reconsideration of Shafer's non-transitive consumer that we present in Section 4.2, and of Schmeidler's existence theorem in Section 4.3; also see Footnote 23 below. What we do not mean by the word hiddenness is the sense that is given to it by Tourky and Yannelis (2000). Their usage is orthogonal to ours, and perhaps also to redundancy: they refer to an assumption being "hidden" as one that is explicit but essential in the sense that eliminating it would require additional hypotheses to obtain the same consequences. 43The italics are the author's, and the example is Wakker (1988a, Example 7.3). For further discussion on the empirical implication of technical assumptions, see Pfanzagl (1971, pp. 107-108) and Narens (1985, pp. 83-84). 23 We now turn more sure-footedly to papers that are directly impacted by our theorems. However, it is important to keep in mind that it is not our intention to give a comprehensive catalogue of each and every result to which our six theorems can be fruitfully applied. We content ourselves with laying out excursionary directions, and leaving it to the reader to pursue in more detail the direction that interests him or her. Furthermore, we emphasize the "forward" direction in our applications. 4.1 Real-valued Representation of Preferences In Barten and Bohm (1982, Section 5), the authors present a representation theorem that they ascribe to Debreu, Eilenberg and Rader.44 We begin with the simple version due to Eilenberg (1941, 6.1)" in his seminal paper.45 Every non-trivial, anti-symmetric, complete, transitive and continuous preference relation on a connected and separable topological space has a continuous utility representation. It follows from implication (a)⇒(c) in Theorem 2 that both completeness and transitivity fol- low from the remaining assumptions of his theorem, hence they are hidden assumptions of his statement. Therefore, we can equivalently state his theorem by dropping both completeness and transitivity assumptions. Moving on to the variant of Eilenberg's result in Debreu (1954, Theorem I), one that dispenses with his anti-symmetry assumption, it is already well-understood that as the consequence of the theorems of of Sonnenschein and Schmeidler, either completeness or full transitivity is hidden in Debreu's assertion. The point that we wish to emphasize here is that as a consequence of (a)⇒(e) in Theorem 2, not one but that both completeness and full transitivity are hidden in Debreu's theorem. Moreover, Wakker (1989, p. 42), as well as Fishburn (1972, pp. 65-66), observe the hiddenness of either one of completeness and transitivity for the existence of a utility representation, and our point is again that both of these assumptions are hidden in this line of the literature.46 This being said, it is important to emphasize that applications that work with strict preference relations as their primitive, such as Peleg (1970) and Majumdar and Sen (1976),47 or those that simply drop both completeness and transitivity such as Nishimura and Ok (2016), also do not fall under the ambit of this paper. The same is true for applications relying on linear structures: they do not fall under the exclusively topological rubric of this paper, and require different mathematical techniques and tools, and we investigate such structures elsewhere; see Galaabaatar, Khan, and Uyanık (2018).48 But again, just because the setting is one of uncertainty, it does not mean that the results are necessarily out of the bounds of our treatment 44Also see Wakker (1988b). For comprehensive treatments, see Bridges and Mehta (1995), Mehta (1998), Herv´es-Beloso and del Valle-Incl´an Cruces (2018) and their references. 45Note that Eilenberg (1941, 2.1) observes the hiddenness of transitivity. Moreover, our insertion of non- triviality in the statement of Eilenberg's theorem do not do violence to his original statement because of the consideration emphasized in Footnote 21 and in the text it footnotes. 46For additional references, the interested reader may see, for example, Debreu (1960), Gorman (1968), Bridges and Mehta (1995) and Vind (2003). 47While Peleg's representation provides only froward direction representation result for incomplete preferences, Majumdar-Sen's approach provides both directions. 48This literature stems from the classic work of Herstein and Milnor (1953), where the topological structure is restricted to that on the unit interval, and the overall thrust is algebraic. 24 elaborated in this paper. In those that rely on the continuity assumptions which we use in this paper, as, for example Karni (2014, Theorem 1.3), the implication (a)⇒ (e) in Theorem 2 yet again implies that both completeness and full transitivity are hidden assumptions. There has been a surge of recent work on decision theory without the completeness postu- late in a setting where the choice set is convex, and therefore connected. Our results, specifically Theorem 2, then suggest that any result for a setting with incomplete preferences, must of necessity weaken the continuity assumption. In this line of literature, most papers drop the as- sumption of open sections; see for example Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Siniscalchi (2003), Dubra, Maccheroni, and Ok (2004) and Evren (2014). The implication (a)⇒(d) in The- orem 4 then yields the consequence that the preference relation must be fragile! To be specific, Dubra, Maccheroni, and Ok (2004, Expected Multi-Utility Theorem) satisfies all of the assump- tions of the implication (a)⇒(d) in Theorem 4, and hence the preference relation the authors work with is fragile, i.e., there exist (x, y) ∈ P such that every open neighborhood of (x, y) contains non-comparable elements. We can, moreover, use the other assumptions of their theo- rem in order to obtain more information about the structure of their incomplete preferences as follows. Their theorem implies that there exists a closed and convex set U of continuous utility functions that represents R. Fragility implies that for all u ∈ U, u(x) < u(y) and any open neighborhood of (x, y) contains (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ V such that u(cid:48)(x(cid:48)) > u(cid:48)(y(cid:48)) (note that weak inequality contradicts fragility) for some u(cid:48) ∈ U. Since the space of utility functions is endowed with the sup-norm topology, it is easy to show that there exists an open neighborhood U of u(cid:48) such that v(cid:48)(x(cid:48)) > v(cid:48)(y(cid:48)) for all v(cid:48) ∈ U . Hence, there is an open set of utility functions that rank x(cid:48) and y(cid:48) opposite of the ranking of x and y. 4.2 Shafer's Non-Transitive Consumer In a direction initiated by Sonnenschein (1971), Shafer (1974) re-works the neoclassical theory of demand for a consumer with incomplete and possibly non-transitive preferences. Our results impact his work not by bringing out any redundancies, but bringing in what non-transitivity assumption fully entails in the light of his other hypotheses. We show that if the preferences of Shafer's non-transitive consumer satisfies a little bit of consistency, then it is fully destructive of all non-transitivity. This is to say that , if any of the four dis-aggregations II, IP, PI and PP of R holds, then the remaining three also hold under his assumptions. And so Shafer's non-transitive consumer has to be, by necessity, a fundamentally non-transitive agent. We elaborate this claim in the following paragraph; it seems to have been missed in the literature. Shafer assumes that the consumer has a complete, continuous and strictly convex preference relation R on Rn +. Strict convexity implies that R is non-trivial and has path-connected upper sections, and convexity of Rn + implies that the choice set is connected. We can now develop the argument for our assertion under three cases. First, if R satisfies II, then by Theorem 6(i), II implies that PI holds. Then it follows from completeness of R and Sen (1969, Theorem I), which we illustrate in Figure 3, that IP also holds. Hence R is semi-transitive and its symmetric part is transitive. Then the implication (a) ⇒ (e) in Theorem 2 implies that R is transitive. Second, assume R satisfies PI. Then Sen's theorem implies that IP and II hold. As above, the transitivity of R follows from Theorem 2. The proof is analogous if R satisfies IP . Finally, if R satisfies PP, the transitivity of R follows from Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 5). Gerasimou (2010) re-works Shafer's theory of the non-transitive consumer by also elimi- 25 nating the completeness postulate and weakening the continuity assumption. Under this sparser structure, a consumer can satisfy some form of transitivity without destroying all forms of transi- tivity. A consumer can admit consistency in some registers without consistency in all. However, what emerges is the essentiality of the transitivity of II: even if we drop completeness in Shafer's model, under full continuity assumption (the sections of R are closed and of P are open) and the convexity assumption of Shafer, our Theorems 2 and 6 that if II holds then the relation R has to be transitive. Therefore, Shafer's non-transitive consumer necessarily violates the transitivity of I even if she has incomplete preferences.49 We conclude this section with the observation that the points that we make in the first two paragraphs above could already have been made in 1965 drawing only on the results of Sonnenschein (1965); as such, they do not require the full power of our results. In any case, they shed new light on what hiddenness may entail.50 4.3 Walrasian Economies and Normal-Form Games In this section, we first illustrate the hiddenness of completeness and full transitivity assumptions in the results on the existence of an equilibrium in Walrasian economies and in normal form games. Then we show how these observations carry over to the economies with indivisibilities. The classical equilibrium existence results in Walrasian economies assume that the choice set of each consumer is a convex subset of the Euclidean space and that each consumer has a complete, transitive and continuous preference relation on the choice set; see for example Arrow and Debreu (1954, Theorem I) and Debreu (1982, Theorems 5 and 8). Moreover, one of the following two properties is assumed: monotonicity or non-satiation. Since the former implies more is better for each consumer and the latter that no consumer has a best element in her consumption set, the preference relation of each consumer is non-trivial. Since convexity of the choice set implies its connectedness, all of the assumptions of the implication (a)⇒(e) in Theorem 2 are satisfied. Hence both of the completeness and full transitivity postulates are hidden for the existence of a Walrasian equilibrium. However hiddenness is also present in many other results in this literature. We invite the reader to check out theorems on the existence of a Walrasian equilibrium with continuum of agents, or externalities, or public goods, or infinite dimensional commodity spaces; see for example Mas-Colell and Zame (1991), Khan and Sun (2002) and McKenzie (2005). However, one can go beyond hiddenness to make points akin to that made above regarding Shafer's non-transitive consumer. If, for example, the continuity and transitivity assumptions made in Schmeidler (1971) are also made in Schmeidler (1969), the existence of competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders and incomplete preferences follows as a straightforward consequence of Aumann's existence theorem, and hardly requires an additional independent proof. In finite games, Nash (1950b) assumes each player has a finite number of pure strategies 49This connects us to Luce's (1956) semi-order, which is further elaborated in Fishburn (1970), a connection that we hope to explore in future work. 50We also single out in this connection, Moldau (1996, Proposition 1). This claims that transitivity on every closed interval of a preference ration defined on a linear space follows from a weak convexity assumption, and as such, hidden by the convexity postulate. Since we are limiting ourselves to the topological register, we hope to engage this claim elsewhere; also see footnote 32 for further references and discussion regarding the convexity assumption. 26 and that the preferences of each player defined on the set of all probability distributions on the set of pure strategies satisfy the axioms of the classic expected utility representation theorem.51 Even though he assumes a weaker continuity assumption than we use, in the presence of other assumptions it implies our stronger continutiy assumption; see Dubra (2011). Therefore, both completeness and full transitivity assumptions are hidden in Nash's results. For games with continuum of actions, Debreu (1952, Theorem) follows a different path (which eliminates ran- domization) and proposes a generalizes Nash's theorem by assuming the choice space is a convex and compact subset of a Euclidean space and the preferences defined on it are complete, transi- tive, continuous and convex.52 Then, as illustrated above, the implication (a)⇒(e) in Theorem 2 suggests the hiddenness of both completeness and full transitivity assumptions.53 Therefore, we can, equivalently re-state Debreu's theorem by dropping the completeness and weakening the transitivity assumption. Although connectedness, or more precisely convexity, of the choice space is a common assumption in economics, an important class of models which study markets with indivisibilities naturally assume disconnected choice spaces; see for example Dierker (1971), Broome (1972), Mas-Colell (1975, 1977), Khan and Yamazaki (1981) and Thomson (2011). In these models, there are (cid:96) indivisible goods and 1 divisible good. For illustration, assume (cid:96) = 1. In particular, assume the consumption set of a consumer X = R+ × Z+ consists of money, which is perfectly divisible, and an indivisible good. Let (cid:23) denote the preferences of the consumer on X. Let ∼ and (cid:31) denote the symmetric and asymmetric parts of (cid:23), respectively. The following assumptions are standard in these models. Figure 4: Economies with Indivisible Commodities 51As shown by Malinvaud (1952), von Neumann and Morgenstern (1947) do not state the independence axiom in their axiomatization. Nash (1950a) and Marschak (1950) independently provide complete axiomatization of expected utility; see Bleichrodt, Li, Moscati, and Wakker (2016), and also Footnote 42 above. 52We summarize the assumptions of the version of Debreu's theorem re-stated in Arrow and Debreu (1954, Lemma). 53Note that without non-triviality, the existence of an equilibrium is triviality, hence the non-triviality assump- tion is non-restrictive. 27 am(A1) For all a ∈ Z+, (m, a) (cid:31) (m(cid:48), a) whenever m > m(cid:48). (A2) For all a, a(cid:48) ∈ Z+, there exist m, m(cid:48) ∈ R+ such that (m, a) ∼ (m(cid:48), a(cid:48)). (A2(cid:48)) For all (m, a), (m(cid:48), a(cid:48)) ∈ R+ × Z+, there exists λ ∈ R+ such that (m + λ, a) (cid:23) (m(cid:48), a(cid:48)). Assumption (A1) is called strict monotonicity in the divisible commodity, (A2) possibility of compensation and (A2(cid:48)) overriding desirability of the divisible commodity. The latter two as- sumptions are substitutes and used interchangeably in the literature. Figure 4 illustrates an economy with indivisible goods which satisfy these standard assumptions. Broome (1972, Theorem 4.11) shows that if a complete, transitive and continuous prefer- ence relation on X satisfies Assumptions (A1) and (A2) along with the assumptions that the consumption set and the preferences satisfy some additional topological and linear structure properties,54 then there exists an approximate equilibrium. We now illustrate that completeness and full transitivity are hidden in the hypothesis of Broome's theorem. Consider a semi-transitive and continuous preference relation (cid:23) on X whose symmetric part is transitive. It is clear that X is disconnected -- for each a ∈ Z+, Ca = R+×{a} is a component of X. It follows from (A1) that there are strictly comparable elements within each component and from any of (A2) or (A2(cid:48)) that there are weakly comparable elements across different components. Therefore, (A1) along with any of (A2) or (A2(cid:48)) imply (cid:23) is componentwise non-trivial. Therefore, Proposition 1 implies that both completeness and full transitivity are hidden assumptions in Broome's theorem. In this line of research, Mas-Colell (1974), Shafer and Sonnenschein (1975) and their fol- lowers work with incomplete and non-transitive preferences, and assume only a strict preference relation, one with open graph or open sections. Hence, our results do not have implications for their work, as indeed, they also do not impact the literature on games with discontinuous preferences pioneered by Dasgupta and Maskin (1986) and Reny (1999), or the reformulation of Cournot-Nash equilibria presented in Khan and Sun (1990). 4.4 Other Potential Applications Our final tripartite subsection is as much an invitation to the reader to apply the results reported above, as it is a laying-out of directions for further work. We begin by asking whether the added specification of finite choice sets allows, if not a sharpening of the results, an opening into other productive directions. We then move on to other potential applications to classical social choice theory and to graphs and networks. Finite Choice Sets Eilenberg's remarkable paper notwithstanding, modern decision and social-choice theory has focused on compactness rather than on connectedness, and has limited itself to a finite setting for an exploration of ideas. It is thus natural to ask whether the results reported in Section 3 of the paper can be extended to provide sharper results simply by seeing a finite set of k alternatives as a k-connected set. One rather obvious impediment to this is the fact that the hypotheses, say of Theorem 1, require P to have a strict relationship within every component, a property precluded by singletons in a finite setting. The question then reduces to whether indifferent alternatives can simply be "factored out"? 54See Assumptions 2.1 (excluding (e) and (f)), 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8 in Broome (1972). 28 We present a result that gives the negative answer to this question: we show that one cannot define a non-trivial, complete, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on a finite and connected topological space. Proposition 3. If R is a complete, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on a topo- logical space X, then the quotient topology on XI is Hausdorff. For a finite choice set, this proposition shows that the quotient topology with respect to the symmetric part of a continuous binary relation is discrete, hence for any connected set in the original space, all of its the elements must be indifferent to each other. As such this direction is a dead end and substantial rethinking is needed, perhaps along the lines of the literature stemming from the application of convex geometry recently developed in the imaginative contribution of Richter and Rubinstein (2015); see Edelman and Jamison (1985) for an early survey. Collective Choice and Social Welfare Moving on to the substance of the theory itself, the last two decades have seen a sub- stantial maturing of the theory of social choice and welfare; see Arrow, Sen, and Suzumura (1995, 1996), Arrow, Sen, and Suzumura (2002, 2011), Fleurbaey, Salles, and Weymark (2006), Fleurbaey and Blanchet (2013), Suzumura (2016), Sen (2017) and their references. Leaving aside the rich philosophical and technical subtlety of this literature, the point is that it involves establishing the consistency, aggregation if one prefers to be more specific, of two types of binary relations: preferences of individuals and those of the group that those individuals constitute. The question reductively reduces to asking whether group and social preferences are "nice" when the individual preferences are "nice"? And to be sure, the adjectives formalizing these valorizations necessarily reduce to postulates such as completeness and transitivity, and thereby bring into play the six theorems that we present above. To get down to specifics, one can delineate how the the hiddenness and redundancy criteria impact the theorems of Harsanyi (1955) and Samuelson (1981), or factor into the recent exercise that Magyarkuti (2010) has carried out also in a purely topological register. Some what more obliquely, but perhaps even more promisingly, Bernheim and Rangel (2009), propose "replacing the standard revealed preference relation with an unambiguous choice relation: roughly, x is (strictly) unambiguously chosen over y (written xP ∗y) iff y is never chosen when x is available." They write If one thinks of P ∗ as a preference relation, then our notion of a weak generalized Pareto optimum coincides with existing notions of social efficiency when consumers have incom- plete and/or intransitive preferences ... . [t]hough P ∗ need not be transitive, it is always acyclic, and therefore suitable for rigorous welfare analysis.55 As such, the authors do not take a stand on a particular story about why choices violate, for example, W ARP , the weak axiom of revealed preferences; but by subsuming behavioral economics as theories that violate WARP, present explorations that surely fall within the rubric of the ES program. 55See Bernheim and Rangel (2009, pp. 75-76); also their Theorem 7 which they see as following directly from standard results of Fon, Mandler, Otani, Rigotti and Shannon. 29 Communication Networks Reverting to finite choice sets and to convex geometry and its implications for partially ordered sets and in graphs, we close this subsection on potential applications by drawing the reader's attention to the analysis of networks, be they social, economic, political or anthropological. This is a very active field of microeconomic theory; see, for example, Jackson (2008) and his references. A simple application of our result on k-connectedness to information transmission net- works, as culled from Jackson (2008, Chapter 7 and Section 13.2 ) and Newman (2006), draws on the observation that transmission of information in small communities, villages and such, can be seen as a network whose node can be seen as a component in the technical sense that we have given to the word in the work reported in this paper. Completeness and transitivity of communication relationships, in the sense of a node x directly or indirectly communicating with the node y, seems formalizable and directly relevant. The continuity of the communica- tion relationship in terms of the distance between villages, the topology being defined by this distance. In this simple formulation, let X ⊂ R2 be the set of individuals which is endowed with the Euclidean topology. The distance between different points represent the distance of the individuals. Let each node (village) denoting a component of X. Define a binary relation (cid:23) on X as follows: x (cid:23) y if and only if x (directly or indirectly) transmits information to y. Under the usual assumptions, if there are pairs of individuals within and across villages who communicate (receive or transmit information to the others), then everybody in the society communicates and the information transmission relation is transitive. On the other hand, if we assume transitivity, then we can weaken the assumption of the existence of a communication link between any pair of villages with that of a chain of communication links among all the villages. To be sure, these are fragmented observations that cry out for a systematic treatment. 5 Concluding Remarks Looked at from far enough, this paper can be easily summarized as revolving around two-and- a-half theorems: the first, second and fourth can be combined and collectively presented for the case k = 1, as one big portmanteau equivalence theorem offering a characterization of topological connectedness;56 the third result, combined with the preceeding two for the case k = 2, as a characterization of 2-connectedness.57 The fifth and sixth results, in giving sufficient conditions for the refinements of transitivity, can be seen as half a theorem of an equivalence that does holds only in one direction. But one or many, the six theorems, and the propositions that supplement them, furnish an overview of a diverse literature in microeconomic theory that is bracketed by a rich mathematical and philosophical literature.58 Our synthetic treatment of the three remarkable contributions that we sight as foundational, facilitates the reading of past, somewhat neglected, work as well as allows a deeper appreciation of how current contributions fit into lines of inquiry with a long-established lineage. In showing the sufficiency and necessity of topological connectedness for both completeness and/or transitivity under one rubric, we generalize and unify these three 56In some sense, we have kept doing versions that approach such a portmanteau theorem. 57The reader is referred to the counterexample a little above the statement of Theorem 3. 58The reader is referred to Temkin (2015), Sen (2017) and their references; also to Anand (1987) and Anand (1993). 30 foundational theorems. To be specific, and perhaps to overly belabour the point, we are not aware of any paper in the literature following Schmeidler that asks for conditions on the topology that follow from his, and Eilenberg's and Sonnenschein's, behavioral consequences. As such, our results in providing a characterization of topological connectedness for behavior, and therefore for its indispensability, are of interest in and of themselves. We are also not aware of topologizing, and thereby bringing into a productive relationship, the influential non-topological results of Sen.59 Modern decision theory, as charted out by von Neumann, Savage and Anscombe-Aumann, is proving fundamental for both behavioural economics and more generally in issues of empirical inference,60 but to the extent that it can be projected to the question of a numerical represen- tation of a preference relation over a set of objects, the ancillary structures both on the set of objects and on the preferences under investigation assume a paramount role. The objects could be probability measures, as in von Neumann-Morgenstern; or functions from a state space to a space of consequences, as in Savage; or functions from a state space to a space of probability measures on a space of consequences, as in Aumann-Anscombe; or induced relations on the sub- sets of a space of consequences, as in the menu choices of Kreps; or n-tuples of preferences over n-products of probability measures, as in the temporal lotteries of Kreps-Porteus; but whatever the objects, successful analysis has, of necessity, to involve a play on the assumptions made on the preferences and the objects on which these preferences may be defined.61 We have limited ourselves solely to the topological register, but already in 1967, Sonnenschein was bringing to bear linear considerations to his deductions concerning transitivity of preferences. To be sure, applications come with a veritable variety of structures, including the linear-algebraic one, with or without a finiteness specification, and how these all interact with each other is a fascinating question that will surely build on the topological treatment explored herein. What also merits emphasis is that this literature naturally dovetails into work on empirical microeconomic theory, experimental psychology, and philosophical investigation into the very meaning of transitivity, completeness and non-satiation, and thereby into specific formalizations of "rationality," one of the more vexatious words of our times. We hope to take our results to this theoretical and applied subject matter next. 6 Proofs of the Results The presentation of our results in Section 3 proceeded from the general to the particular: from full equivalence of the k-connected case to the 2-connected and connected cases (Theorems 1 to 59As already pointed out in Footnote 3 in the context of the mathematical literature, Ward (1954) and Bridges and Mehta (1995) are important references subsequent to Nachbin's pioneering monograph on "Topology and Order;" and McGehee (1992) for application to dynamical systems. The philosophical literature is immense but Anand (1987, 1993) furnish an admirable entry into issues concerning the rationality or the irrationality of transitivity and completeness; in addition to the references in Sen (2017) and Temkin, see Tullock (1964). To be sure, any sharp lines to differentiate between the substantive and the technical eventually leads to sterility. 60For the first see Bernheim and Rangel (2009) and their references; and for the second, see Pfanzagl (1971) and Narens (1985). 61 All this is now so much part of the folklore that detailed references are hardly necessary. But the reader can do no worse than begin with Fishburn (1972) and Gilboa (2009) on the one hand, and Mehta (1998) and Bridges and Mehta (1995) on the other. For current activity in the field, in addition to the three references with which we began Section 4, we refer the reader to Gerasimou (2017) and Strzalecki (2013) and their references. 31 4), and then finally to the forward (sufficiency) case establishing transitivity in Theorem 5. The motivation for this is simply that it simply gives the readership the option to read Theorems 1 and 2 for for the case k = 1, and indeed limit themselves only to the forward case. This enables it to see how more restricted settings lead to sharper conclusions. However this is not the best strategy for doing, and presenting, the proofs. It is the more concrete cases that are generalized. As such, we begin with the ancillary Proposition 2 to follow, and use it to prove Theorems 5 and 6. And then Theorem 5 is used in the proof of Theorem 1. These two theorems are used as an input in the proof of Theorem 2. The latter is then used to prove Theorems 3 and 4. Proof of Proposition 2. We take each claim in turn. (a) The sufficiency of T is due to Sen (1969, Theorem I, assertion I.1). In order prove the necessity of T, assume y ∈ R(x) and z ∈ R(y). If y ∈ R−1(x) and z ∈ R−1(y), then II implies z ∈ I(x), hence z ∈ R(x). If y /∈ R−1(x), or z /∈ R−1(y), or both, then it follows from PP, PI, IP that z ∈ P (x), hence z ∈ R(x). (b) Assume y ∈ P (x) and z ∈ P (y). It follows from y ∈ P (x) and NP that z ∈ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). Since z ∈ P (y) and P is asymmetric, therefore z ∈ P (x), hence PP holds. Now, assume y ∈ P (x), z ∈ I(y) and z /∈ P (x). It follows from z ∈ I(y) that y /∈ P (z). Then NP implies y /∈ P (x). This furnishes us a contradiction. Hence, PI holds. An analogous argument implies IP. (c) Let X be a set with at least three elements and R = {(x, y)} where x, y ∈ X and x (cid:54)= y. It is clear that R is transitive and P = R. It follows from (x, z) /∈ P, (z, y) /∈ P and (x, y) ∈ P for z (cid:54)= x, y that NP is not satisfied. Now define R(cid:48) = {(x, y), (y, x)}. Then, P (cid:48) = ∅, hence NP holds. Since (x, x) /∈ R(cid:48), therefore T is not satisfied. (d) We provide a proof by considering examples. Let x, y, z, w be distinct elements of X. We first show II is independent of PP, PI, IP. Define R = {(x, y), (y, x), (x, x), (y, y), (y, z), (z, x)}. It is clear that this violates PP, PI, IP, but not II. Next consider R = {(x, y), (y, x)}. This violates II, but not PP, PI, IP. Second, we show that PI is independent of PP, IP, II. De- fine R = {(x, y), (y, z), (x, w), (w, x)}. This violates PP, IP, II, but not PI. Next consider R = {(x, y), (y, z), (z, y), (y, y), (z, z)}. This violates PI, but not PP, IP, II. The indepen- dence of IP is analogously proved and the independence of PP is illustrated in Sen (1969, Theorem I, assertion I.2). Third, we show that PP, II are independent of IP, PI. Define R = {(x, y), (y, z), (z, y), (y, y), (z, z), (z, w)}. This violates IP, PI, but not PP, II. Next consider R = {(x, y), (y, x), (y, z), (x, z), (z, w)}. This violates PP, II, but not IP, PI. Fourth, we show that II, PI are independent of PP, IP. Define R = {(x, w), (w, x), (x, x), (w, w), (x, y), (y, z)}. This vi- olates PP, IP, but not II, PI. Next consider R = {(x, y), (y, z), (z, y)}. This violates II, PI, but not PP, IP. The independence of II, IP and PP, PI can be shown analogously. The proof of Proposition 2 is complete. Next we turn to the proof of Theorem 5. Before that we need the following definition and a lemma. {Aλ ⊂ X λ ∈ Λ} such that (cid:83) Definition 13. A partition of a set X is a collection of non-empty and pairwise disjoint sets λ∈Λ Aλ = X. A partition is open if all of its members are open, and a partition is closed if all of its members are closed. 32 Lemma 1. For all semi-transitive and continuous binary relation R on a topological space X, all components C, C(cid:48) of X and all x ∈ C, y ∈ C(cid:48), if (x, y) ∈ P, then C ∪ C(cid:48) ⊂ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). Proof of Lemma 1. Pick, possibly identical, two components C, C(cid:48) of X and x ∈ C, y ∈ C(cid:48) such that (x, y) ∈ P . Then, x ∈ P −1(y) and y ∈ P (x). Hence P (x) ∪ P −1(y) has non-empty intersections with both C and C(cid:48). It follows from P has open sections that P (x)∪P −1(y) is open. Since R has closed sections, therefore R(x)∪ R−1(y) is closed. If P (x)∪ P −1(y) = R(x)∪ R−1(y), then we have a subset of X which is both open and closed, and has non-empty intersection with both C and C(cid:48). Since C and C(cid:48) are components of X, therefore C ∪ C(cid:48) ⊂ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). It remains to prove P (x) ∪ P −1(y) = R(x) ∪ R−1(y). It is clear that P (x) ∪ P −1(y) ⊂ R(x) ∪ R−1(y). In order to show the reverse inclusion assume there exists z ∈ R(x) ∪ R−1(y) such that z /∈ P (x) and z /∈ P −1(y). If z ∈ R(x), then it follows from z /∈ P (x) that x ∈ R(z). Hence (z, x) ∈ I. It follows from IP and (x, y) ∈ P that z ∈ P −1(y). This furnishes us a contradiction. If z ∈ R−1(y), then it follows from z /∈ P −1(y) that z ∈ R(y). Hence (y, z) ∈ I. It follows from PI and (x, y) ∈ P that z ∈ P (x). This furnishes us a contradiction. Therefore R(x) ∪ R−1(y) ⊂ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). Proof of Theorem 5. We assume that R is a continuous binary relation on a topological space X and begin the proof of each claim in (a) under the assumption that the topology on X is connected. (i) Note that P is negatively transitive if and only if for all x, y, z ∈ X, (x, y) ∈ P implies either (x, z) ∈ P or (z, y) ∈ P . Pick x, y ∈ X such that (x, y) ∈ P. Since X is connected, it follows from Lemma 1 that X ⊂ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). Hence, P is negatively transitive. The backward direction follows from the assertion (b) in Proposition 2. (ii), (iii), (iv) The proofs follow from the assertions (i) above, and (a), (b) in Proposition 2. Next, we turn to the proof of each claim in (b) under the assumption that the sections of I are connected. (i) Pick x, y, z ∈ X such that y ∈ P (x) and z ∈ I(y). Assume z /∈ P (x). Then, it follows from II that I(x) ∩ I(z) = ∅. Then X = I(x) ∪ P (x) ∪ P −1(x) ∪ (R(x) ∪ R−1(x))c implies that I(z) = [P (x) ∩ I(z)] ∪(cid:2)P −1(x) ∩ I(z)(cid:3) ∪(cid:2)(R(x))c ∩(cid:0)R−1(x)(cid:1)c ∩ I(z)(cid:3) . It is clear that the three sets in square brackets are pairwise disjoint. Since P has open sections and R has closed sections, the three sets in square brackets are open in I(z). Since (z, y) ∈ I and I is symmetric, therefore (y, z) ∈ I. Then II implies (z, z) ∈ I. Therefore, y, z ∈ I(z). It is clear that y ∈ P (x)∩ I(z). Since we assume above that z /∈ P (x), therefore z is either in P −1(x) or in (R(x))c∩ (R−1(x))c, but not in both since these two sets are disjoint. If z ∈ P −1(x), then P (x)∩ I(z) and the union of the remaining two sets in square brackets above form an open partition of I(z) which contradicts the connectedness of I(z). Analogously, z ∈ (R(x))c∩ (R−1(x))c furnishes us a contradiction to the connectedness of I(z). Therefore, z ∈ P (x), and hence PI holds. An analogous argument implies IP holds. (ii) The proof follows from assertions (i) above and (a) in Proposition 2. The proof of Theorem 5 is complete. We now turn to the proof of Theorem 6. 33 Proof of Theorem 6. Let X be a topological space with the Phragmen-Brouwer property and R a continuous relation on it with path-connected sections. We take each claim in turn. (i) Assume the section of the symmetric part I of R is transitive. Now consider the following claim. Claim 1. For all z ∈ X, the sets P (z) and P −1(z) ∪ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c are separated. Pick x, y, z ∈ X such that x ∈ I(y) and y ∈ P (z). Assume x /∈ P (z). If x ∈ I(z), then it follows from the transitivity of I that y ∈ I(z), which contradicts with y ∈ P (z). Therefore, either x ∈ P −1(z) or x ∈ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c . Recall that x ∈ P −1(z)∪ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c , y ∈ P (z) and X\I(z) = P (z) ∪ P −1(z) ∪(cid:0)R(z) ∪ R−1(z)(cid:1)c . Claim 1 implies that the sets P (z) and P −1(z)∪ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c are separated. Then it follows from X has the Phragmen-Brouwer property that there exists a connected subset62 Iz of I(z) which separates x and y. Note that II and (x, y) ∈ I imply that x, y ∈ R(y). Since R(y) is path-connected, therefore there exists a continuous function s : [0, 1] → R(y) such that s(0) = x and s(1) = y. Note that s([0, 1]) is connected and x, y are contained in different components of X\Iz, therefore there exists λ ∈ [0, 1] such that s(λ) = z(cid:48) ∈ Iz ∩ R(y). Since Iz ⊂ I(z), it follows from II and y ∈ P (z) that Iz ∩ I(y) = ∅. Hence z(cid:48) ∈ P (y) and Iz = [P (y) ∩ Iz] ∪(cid:2)P −1(y) ∩ Iz (cid:3) ∪(cid:2)(cid:0)R(y) ∪ R−1(y)(cid:1)c ∩ Iz (cid:3) . Since Iz is connected and z(cid:48) ∈ P (y), therefore Iz ⊂ P (y). Claim 1 implies that P (y) and P −1(y)∪(R(y) ∪ R−1(y))c are separated subsets of X. Then, it follows from z(cid:48) ∈ P (y) and z ∈ P −1(y) that there exists a connected subset Iy of I(y) which separates z(cid:48) and z. Note that z(cid:48) ∈ Iz ⊂ I(z) and II imply that (z, z) ∈ I. Then z, z(cid:48) ∈ R(z(cid:48)) and R(z(cid:48)) is path-connected imply that there exists a continuous function s(cid:48) : [0, 1] → R(z(cid:48)) such that s(cid:48)(0) = z and s(cid:48)(1) = z(cid:48). Note that s(cid:48)([0, 1]) is connected and z, z(cid:48) are contained in different components of X\Iy, therefore there exists λ ∈ [0, 1] such that s(cid:48)(λ) = y(cid:48) ∈ Iy. It follows from the transitivity of I that Iy ∩ I(z(cid:48)) = ∅, therefore Iy = [P (z(cid:48)) ∩ Iy] ∪(cid:2)P −1(z(cid:48)) ∩ Iy (cid:3) ∪(cid:2)(cid:0)R(z(cid:48)) ∪ R−1(z(cid:48))(cid:1)c ∩ Iy Since Iy is connected and y(cid:48) ∈ P (z(cid:48)), therefore Iy ⊂ P (z(cid:48)). It follows from z(cid:48) ∈ P −1(y(cid:48)) and Iz is connected that Iz ⊂ P −1(y(cid:48)). Therefore, R(y(cid:48)) ⊂ X\Iz. Then x, y ∈ R(y(cid:48)) and x, y are contained in distinct components of X\Iz contradicts with R(y(cid:48)) is connected. Therefore, x ∈ P (z), hence PI holds. (cid:3) . It remains to prove Claim 1 in order to finish the proof of (i). 62Note that we can choose this connected subset as the component C of I(z) which contains Iz. This follows from the fact that if a set is connected in a subspace Y of a topological space, then it is also connected in any subspace containing Y . In order to see this, note that it follows from Iz separates x and y that there exist distinct components Cx and Cy of X\Iz such that x ∈ Cx and y ∈ Cy. Assume that x and y are contained in the same component Cxy of X\C. Since C contains Iz, therefore X\C ⊂ X\Iz. Hence Cxy is connected in X\Iz. Then x ∈ Cx ∩ Cxy and y ∈ Cy ∩ Cxy contradict Cx and Cy being distinct components of X\Iz. Therefore, x and y are contained in distinct components of X\C, i.e., C separates x and y. Since any component of a space is connected, the requirement that the subset Iz is closed in the definition of the Phragmen-Brouwer property in Wilder (1949, Property V(cid:48), p. 50) is not restrictive. However, our version requires the separation property holds only for open sets. 34 Proof of Claim 1. Pick z ∈ X and define A = P −1(z) ∪ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c. Since R(z) is closed, therefore P (z) ⊂ R(z). It is clear that R(z) ∩ A = ∅, hence P (z) ∩ A = ∅. It remains to show that A∩ P (z) = ∅. It follows from P (z) is open, A∪ I(z)∪ P (z) = X and (A∪ I(z))∩ P (z) = ∅ that A∪ I(z) = (P (z))c and A∪ I(z) is closed. Therefore ¯A ⊂ A∪ I(z), and hence ¯A∩ P (z) = ∅. Therefore, P (z) and P −1(z) ∪ (R(z) ∪ R−1(z))c are separated sets in X. (ii) Replacing R and P with R−1 and P −1 in the proof of claim (i) above completes the proof. (iii) The proof follows from claims (i) and (ii) above and Proposition 2(a). The proof of Theorem 6 is complete. We now turn to the proof of Theorem 1. Before that we need the following two lemmata. Lemma 2. Any non-empty, closed and open subset of a topological space is a union of the components of the space. X. Let Cx denote the component of X containing x ∈ X. We next show that V =(cid:83) clear that V ⊂(cid:83) Proof of Lemma 2. Pick a non-empty, closed and open subset V of a topological space X. It follows from Dugundji (1966, Theorem 3.2) that the components of X form a closed partition of x∈V Cx. It is x∈V Cx. In order to show the reverse inclusion, pick x ∈ V, define Ax = Cx ∩ V and Bx = Cx∩V c. Since Cx, V, V c are closed, therefore Ax, Bx are closed. Moreover, Ax∪Bx = Cx x ∩ Cx. Hence, Ax and Bx are both open and and Ax ∩ Bx = ∅. Then Ax = Bc closed in the subspace Cx. Since Cx is connected, therefore either Ax = ∅ or Bx = ∅. It follows from x ∈ A that Bx = ∅. Then Ax = Cx. Since Ax = Cx ∩ V, therefore Cx ⊂ V. x ∩ Cx and Bx = Ac Lemma 3. Any topological space with at least k components has a partition consisting of k sets which are both open and closed. 1. Since Ac 1 is open and closed in X, therefore A2, Ac 2 of Ac 1 are the unions of distinct components. Let Ac 1 is disconnected, hence there exist non-empty subsets A2, Ac Proof of Lemma 3. Pick a natural number k and assume X is a topological space with at least k components. If k = 1, then setting {X} as the partition of X completes the proof. Otherwise, X is disconnected, hence there exist A1, Ac 1 which form a partition of X which is both open and closed. If k = 2, then the proof is complete. Otherwise, Lemma 2 implies that A1 and Ac 1 can be written as a union of the components of X. Since the components of X are disjoint, therefore A1 and Ac 1 be the union of at least two components. Then, Ac 1 which are both open and closed in the subspace Ac 2 are also open and closed in X. Then, A1, A2, Ac 2 form a partition of X which is both open and closed. If k = 3, then the proof is complete. Otherwise, repeating this procedure (k − 1)-many times yields an open partition of X consisting of k sets. Proof of Theorem 1. We begin the proof with (a) ⇒ (e). The proof rests on three claims which we state and use, and prove only after the proof of the implication (a) ⇒ (e) is complete. Assume X is k-connected and {C1, . . . , Ck} denote the set of components of X. Define K = {1, . . . , k}. Let R be a k-non-trivial, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on X such that its symmetric part is transitive. The following claim shows that every pair of components contains strictly comparable elements. Claim 2. For all i, j ∈ K, there exists xi ∈ Ci, xj ∈ Cj such that (xi, xj) ∈ P ∪ P −1. 35 Assume there exist x, y ∈ X such that (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1. Then x ∈ Ci and y ∈ Cj for some i, j ∈ K. Claim 2 implies that there exist xi ∈ Ci, xj ∈ Cj such that (xi, xj) ∈ P ∪ P −1. Without loss of generality, assume (xi, xj) ∈ P. Then, it follows from Lemma 1 that x, y ∈ P (xi)∪P −1(xj). The following claim shows that both x and y are contained in at least one of these two sets. Claim 3. {x, y} ⊂ P (xi) or {x, y} ⊂ P −1(xj). It follows from Claim 3 that xi ∈ P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) or xj ∈ P (x) ∩ P (y). Therefore, [P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y)] ∩ Ci (cid:54)= ∅ or [P (x) ∩ P (y)] ∩ Cj (cid:54)= ∅. It follows from x ∈ Ci, y ∈ Cj, x, y /∈ P −1(x)∩P −1(y) and x, y /∈ P (x)∩P (y) that Ci, Cj (cid:54)⊂ P −1(x)∩P −1(y) and Ci, Cj (cid:54)⊂ P (x)∩P (y). Claim 4. P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) = R−1(x) ∩ R−1(y) and P (x) ∩ P (y) = R(x) ∩ R(y). It follows from continuity of R and Claim 4 that P (x) ∩ P (y) and P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) are both of Ci or {P (x) ∩ P (y) ∩ Cj, [P (x) ∩ P (y)]c ∩ Cj} is an open partition of Cj. This furnishes us a contradiction to Ci and Cj being components of X. Therefore, R is complete and hence the proof of assertion (a) ⇒ (e) is complete. open and closed. Then (cid:8)P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) ∩ Ci, [P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y)]c ∩ Ci (cid:9) is an open partition It now remains to prove Claims 2 -- 4. Proof of Claim 2. First, pick i, j ∈ K such that i = j. It follows from k-non-triviality that there exist ¯xj, ¯yj ∈ Cj such that (¯xj, ¯yj) ∈ P. Then Lemma 1 implies that Cj ⊂ P (¯xj) ∪ P −1(¯yj). Second, pick i, j ∈ K such that i (cid:54)= j. Then k-non-triviality implies that there exist xi ∈ Ci, xj ∈ Cj such that (xi, xj) ∈ R ∪ R−1. Assume without loss of generality that (xi, xj) ∈ R. If (xi, xj) ∈ P, then the proof is complete. Then, let (xi, xj) ∈ I. Since xj ∈ Cj ⊂ P (¯xj)∪ P −1(¯yj), therefore the semi-transitivity of R implies that (xi, ¯yj) ∈ P or (xi, ¯xj) ∈ P −1. Proof of Claim 3. If x ∈ P −1(xj), then Lemma 1 implies that y ∈ P (x) ∪ P −1(xj). Since y /∈ P (x), therefore y ∈ P −1(xj). If x ∈ P (xi), then it follows from x, xi ∈ Ci and Lemma 1 that P (xi) ∪ P −1(x) is both open and closed and contains Ci. Since xj ∈ P (xi) ∩ Cj, therefore P (xi) ∪ P −1(x) has a non-empty intersection with Cj. Then, it follows from P (xi) ∪ P −1(x) is both open and closed, and Cj is a component of X that Ci ∪ Cj ⊂ P (xi) ∪ P −1(x). Hence, y ∈ P (xi) ∪ P −1(x). Since y /∈ P −1(x), therefore y ∈ P (xi). Proof of Claim 4. It is clear that P (x) ∩ P (y) ⊂ R(x) ∩ R(y). In order to show the reverse inclusion assume there exists z ∈ R(x)∩ R(y) such that z /∈ P (x) or z /∈ P (y). If z /∈ P (x), then it follows from z ∈ R(x) that (z, x) ∈ I. Then, z ∈ R(y), II and PI imply either (y, x) ∈ I or (y, x) ∈ P. This furnishes us a contradiction to (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1. If z /∈ P (y), then it follows from z ∈ R(y) that (z, y) ∈ I. Then, z ∈ R(x), II and IP imply either (x, y) ∈ I or (x, y) ∈ P. This furnishes us a contradiction to (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1. Therefore, R(x) ∩ R(y) ⊂ P (x) ∩ P (y). Replacing R with R−1 and P with P −1 in the argument above implies that P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) = R−1(x) ∩ R−1(y). Next we turn to the other implications in Theorem 1. (a) ⇒ (d) Theorem 5(b) implies R is semi-transitive. Then (a) ⇒ (e) above completes the proof. (a) ⇒ (c) The proof follows from (a) ⇒ (e) above and the observation that the anti-symmetry of R implies that R is semi-transitive and I is transitive. In order to see this note that it follows from the anti-symmetry of R that I(x) ⊂ {x}. Then, if y ∈ P (x) and z ∈ I(y), then z = y, 36 hence z ∈ P (x). If y ∈ I(x) and z ∈ P (y), then x = y, hence z ∈ P (x). Similarly, if y ∈ I(x) and z ∈ I(y), then z = y = x, hence z ∈ I(x). (a) ⇒ (b) The proof follows from (a) ⇒ (e) since Proposition 2(a) implies that R is semi- transitive and its symmetric part is transitive. (e), (d), (c), (b) ⇒ (a) Assume X has at least k + 1 components. Then Lemma 3 implies that there exists a partition {Y1, Y2 . . . , Yk+1} of X which is both open and closed. Define a binary relation R on X as (cid:32) k+1(cid:91) k(cid:91) R = (cid:33) Yi × Yj . i=1 j=i+1 Then the symmetric part of R is I = ∅ and its asymmetric part is P = R. By construction, the sections of R are closed and the sections of P are open. Moreover, R is transitive, semi-transitive and anti-symmetric, and I is transitive. Defining mi = i and ni = i + 1 for all i ≤ k + 1 imply that R is k-non-trivial. Finally, it is clear that R is incomplete. The proof of Theorem 1 is complete. Before turning to the proof of Theorem 2, we comment on our proof-technique. Eilenberg uses completeness of an anti-symmetric and continuous relation on a connected space in order to obtain transitivity. Sonnenschein exploits his standard quotient-space construction to drop the anti-symmetry assumption in Eilenberg's theorem. He bring into prominence the assumption of semi-transitivity of the relation which is satisfied by any anti-symmetric relation, and then provides a series of sufficient conditions for semi-transitivity by imposing further topological assumptions on preferences. On the other hand Schmeidler uses transitivity of a non-trivial and continuous relation on a connected space in order to obtain completeness. Although both use the connectedness of the space and the continuity of the relation, the proof techniques of Schmeidler and of Eilenberg-Sonnenschein are quite different. In the proofs of Theorems 1 and 5 above, the latter has transitivity and the former, completeness as its necessary condition. Our proof-technique is inspired by that of Schmeidler, and we use it to obtain independently each of the completeness and the transitivity properties in the forward-direction of Theorem 2. This alternative proof of the results of Eilenberg and Sonnenschein may have some independent interest. We are now ready to prove Theorem 2. Proof of Theorem 2. We first prove the forward direction and then turn to the proof of the backward direction. In the forward direction, for each assertion, completeness follows from its counterpart in Theorem 1. Hence, the proof of the implication (a)⇒(b) is complete. We next prove that transitivity holds in the remaining implications without using the completeness property. If X has only one component, then transitivity follows from Proposition 2 and Theorem 5. Hence, assume X has two components C1, C2 which form a partition of X that is both open and closed. (a) ⇒ (e). Assume R is a 2-non-trivial, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on X with a transitive symmetric part. Pick x, y, z ∈ X such that y ∈ R(x) and z ∈ R(y). If x ∈ R(y) or y ∈ R(z) holds, then the semi-transitivity of R and the transitivity of I imply z ∈ R(x). Hence, assume y ∈ P (x) and z ∈ P (y). Since C1 and C2 form a partition of X, each of x, y, z is 37 contained in one and only one of these two components. Then the following four cases cover all possibilities: (i) x, y, z ∈ Ci, (ii) x, y ∈ Ci, z ∈ Cj, (iii) x, z ∈ Ci, y ∈ Cj and (iv) x ∈ Ci, y, z ∈ Cj where i = 1, 2, i (cid:54)= j. Before elaborating the cases note that it follows from Lemma 1 that for all i, j = 1, 2, if there exist xi ∈ Ci and yj ∈ Cj such that (xi, yj) ∈ P , then Ci ∪ Cj ⊂ P (xi) ∪ P −1(xj). Then in cases (i), (ii) and (iii), Lemma 1 implies that x ∈ P (y) ∪ P −1(z). Then it follows from y ∈ P (x) that z ∈ P (x). Similarly, in case (iv), Lemma 1 implies that z ∈ P (x) ∪ P −1(y). Then it follows from z ∈ P (y) that z ∈ P (x). Therefore, R is transitive. (a) ⇒ (d) The proof follows from (a) ⇒ (e) above and Theorem 5(b). (a) ⇒ (c) The proof follows from (a) ⇒ (e) above and the observation that any anti-symmetric relation is semi-transitive and its symmetric part is transitive. The proof of the forward direction is complete. We provide the proof of the backward direction by considering cases k = 1 and k = 2 separately. We begin with the case k = 1. (e), (d), (c), (b) ⇒ (a) Assume X is disconnected. Then there exists an open partition of X consisting of a set Y and its complement Y c. Define R = Y × Y c. Then it is asymmetric, hence I = ∅ and P = R. Since Y and Y c are both open and closed, therefore R(x) = Y c = P (x) and R−1(x) = Y = P −1(x) are both open and closed for all x ∈ X. Since P (cid:54)= ∅, R is non-trivial. It follows from P = R that R is anti-symmetric. It is clear that R is transitive, hence semi- transitive. Moreover, since I = ∅, therefore it is transitive and its sections are connected. Since Y and Y c are non-empty, therefore R ∪ R−1 (cid:54)= X × X, i.e. R is not complete. This furnishes us a contradiction. Next we turn to the case k = 2. (e), (d), (c), (b) ⇒ (a) Assume X has at least three components. Then Lemma 3 implies that there exists a partition {Y1, Y2, Y3} of X which is both open and closed. Define a binary relation on X as R = (Y1 × Y2) ∪ (Y1 × Y3) ∪ (Y2 × Y3) . Then it is asymmetric, hence I = ∅ and P = R. By construction, the sections of R is closed, of P are open and of I are connected. Moreover, R is transitive, semi-transitive and anti-symmetric, and I is transitive. Defining C1 = {Y1, Y2} and C2 = {Y2, Y3} implies R is 2-non-trivial. Finally, it is clear that R is incomplete. The proof of Theorem 2 is complete. Remark: We could have also relied on the proof-technique of Eilenberg-Sonnenschein in order to prove Theorem 2. This would require reflexivity of the preference relation. Since the assumptions of the theorem imply the completeness of the relation, and hence its reflexivity, this is not a restrictive assumption. Moreover, this method requires the following intermediate result on the relation between the number of the components of a space and of its quotient space, and whose proof is an easy consequence of Lemma 3. Let X be a topological space, I an equivalence relation on it and XI the quotient space of it with respect to I. If X has k components, then XI has at most k components. Moreover, if XI has k components, then X has at least k components. If the section of I are connected, then this result suggests that the connectedness of a space X is equivalent to the connectedness of its quotient XI. Therefore, the weaker connectedness 38 assumption of Sonnenschein (1965, Theorem 4) (XI is connected) is equivalent to the stronger connectedness assumption (X is connected). We now turn to the proof of Theorem 3. Proof of Theorem 3. In the forward direction, each assertion is a special case of its counter- part in Theorem 2, hence the proof of this direction is complete. Note that we have not used the assumption that the space is quasi-ordered yet. (d), (c), (b) ⇒ (a) Assume X is a quasi-ordered space and has at least three components. Then Lemma 3 implies that there exists a partition {Y1, Y2, Y3} of X which is both open and closed. Let Q be a complete, anti-symmetric and continuous binary relation (since the space is quasi- ordered, such relation exists). Define a binary relation R on X as follows. x ∈ R(y) ⇔ x ∈ Q(y), i = 1, 2, 3, ∀x, y ∈ Yi, ∀x ∈ Y1,∀y ∈ Y2, y ∈ R(x), ∀y ∈ Y2,∀z ∈ Y3, z ∈ R(y), ∀x ∈ Y1,∀z ∈ Y3, x ∈ R(z). We next show that R is complete and anti-symmetric with closed sections, but non-transitive. It follows from Q is complete and anti-symmetric that R is complete and anti-symmetric. Pick x ∈ Y1, y ∈ Y2, z ∈ Y3. Then R(x) = (Q(x) ∩ Y1) ∪ Y2 and R−1(x) = (Q−1(x) ∩ Y1) ∪ Y3, R(y) = (Q(y) ∩ Y2) ∪ Y3 and R−1(y) = (Q−1(y) ∩ Y2) ∪ Y1, R(z) = (Q(z) ∩ Y3) ∪ Y1 and R−1(z) = (Q−1(z) ∩ Y3) ∪ Y2. It follows from Q has closed sections and Y1, Y2, Y3 are closed that R has closed sections. Since x ∈ Y1, y ∈ Y2, z ∈ Y3 implies y ∈ R(x), z ∈ R(y) and x ∈ R(z), the relation R is non-transitive. This furnishes us a contradiction. Hence X is 2-connected. The proof of Theorem 3 is complete. We now turn to the proof of Theorem 4. Proof of Theorem 4. (a) ⇒ (b) Assume R is incomplete. Let P denote its asymmetric part. Note that it follows from the negative transitivity of P that if (x, y) ∈ P, then P (x) ∪ P −1(y) = X. (1) Since R is incomplete, there exists x, y ∈ X such that (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1. Then P −1(x) ∩ P −1(y) and P (x) ∩ P (y) are proper subsets of X. Since R is strongly non-trivial, there exist (¯x, ¯y) ∈ P such that R(x(cid:48))∩R(y(cid:48)) (cid:54)= ∅ for all x(cid:48), y(cid:48) ∈ P (¯x). It follows from (1) above that x ∈ P (¯x)∪P −1(¯y). If x ∈ P (¯x), then (1) implies that y ∈ P (¯x) ∪ P −1(x). Since y /∈ P −1(x), therefore y ∈ P (¯x). Since x, y ∈ P (¯x), there exists z ∈ X such that z ∈ R(x) ∩ R(y). If x ∈ P −1(¯y), then (1) implies that y ∈ P (x) ∪ P −1(¯y). Since y /∈ P (x), y ∈ P −1(¯y).Hence, ¯y ∈ P (x) ∩ P (y). Therefore, we established that R(x) ∩ R(y) (cid:54)= ∅. Since R is semi-transitive and I is transitive, therefore Claim 4 in the proof of Theorem 1 implies that R(x) ∩ R(y) = P (x) ∩ P (y). Then there exists a non-empty and proper subset of X which is both open and closed. This furnishes us a contradiction to the connectedness of X. Therefore, R is complete. Then, the completeness of R and the negative transitivity of P implies the transitivity of R. Since R−1(z) = (P (z))c for all z ∈ X when R is complete, therefore R has closed sections and P has open sections, hence R is continuous. 39 (a) ⇒ (c) Theorem 2 implies that the relation is complete and transitive. Then the proof follows from Eilenberg (1941, Theorem II). (a) ⇒ (e) Let R be a binary relation R on topological space X satisfying the assumptions of the hypothesis of the implication and assume it is not sensitive. Then, for all (x, y) /∈ R ∪ R−1 there exists an open neighborhood V of (x, y) such that V ∩ (R ∪ R−1) = ∅. Then (R ∪ R−1)c is open, hence it has open sections. Note that X = P (z) ∪ R−1(z) ∪ (R ∪ R−1)c (z) = P −1(z) ∪ R(z)∪ (R ∪ R−1)c (z) for any z ∈ X. Then it follows from P has open sections that R has closed sections. Then Theorem 2 implies that R is complete. This furnishes us a contradiction. (a) ⇒ (d) is due to Gerasimou (2013, Corollary 3),63 (a) ⇒ (f ) is due to Chateauneuf (1987, Fundamental Lemma) and (a) ⇒ (g) is due to Chateauneuf (1987, Theorem). (b) ⇒ (a) Assume X is disconnected. Then there exists an open partition of X consisting of a set Y and its complement Y c. Define R = X × Y c. Then, P = Y × Y c is its asymmetric part and I = Y c × Y c its symmetric part. For all x ∈ X, R(x) = Y c and P (x) = Y c or P (x) = ∅. Since Y c and ∅ are open, therefore R has closed upper sections and P has open upper sections. The strong non-triviality of R follows from P (x) = Y c for all x ∈ Y and R(x(cid:48)) = Y c for all x(cid:48) ∈ Y c. In order to see that R is transitive, pick (x, y), (y, z) ∈ R. Then y, z ∈ Y c. Hence (x, z) ∈ R. It follows from P (x) ∪ P −1(y) = Y c ∪ Y for all (x, y) ∈ P that P is negatively transitive. Finally, it is clear that R is incomplete. (c) ⇒ (a) Assume X is disconnected. Then there exists an open partition of X consisting of a set Y and its complement Y c. Let Q be an anti-symmetric, complete and continuous binary relation on X (since the space is quasi-ordered, such relation exists). Then for all x ∈ Y and y ∈ Y c, either (x, y) ∈ Q or (y, x) ∈ Q. Assume without loss of generality that there exist x ∈ Y and y ∈ Y c such that (y, x) ∈ Q. Define another binary relation R on X as follows. ∀x, y ∈ Y, x ∈ R(y) ⇔ x ∈ Q(y), ∀x, y ∈ Y c, x ∈ R(y) ⇔ x ∈ Q(y), ∀x ∈ Y,∀y ∈ Y c, y ∈ R(x). It is clear that R is anti-symmetric and complete. For all x ∈ Y , R(x) = Q(x) ∪ Y c and R−1(x) = Q−1(x) ∩ Y. For all y ∈ Y c. Then R(y) = Q(y) ∩ Y c and R−1(y) = Q−1(y) ∪ Y. Since Q has closed sections and Y, Y c are closed, therefore R has closed sections. Then, completeness implies R is continuous. Note that Q and R has identical ordering both on Y and on Y c. Moreover, it follows from (y(cid:48), x(cid:48)) ∈ Q for some (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ Y × Y c and (x, y) ∈ R for all (x, y) ∈ Y × Y c that Q and R have different ordering among the elements of Y and Y c. Since X has more than two elements, therefore Q and R are neither identical, nor inverse to each other. (d), (e) ⇒ (a) Assume X is disconnected. Then there exists an open partition of X consisting of a set Y and its complement Y c. Define R = Y × Y c as in the proof of the backward direction implication for k = 1 in Theorem 2. Then R is incomplete, non-trivial, transitive, has closed sections and its asymmetric part P has open sections. Now pick an arbitrary pair (x, y) ∈ P = Y × Y c. Since Y and Y c are open, Y × Y c is open. Hence Y × Y c is an open neighborhood 63Gerasimou (2013, Corollary 3) showed that this statement is true provided that the space is connected and R is reflexive. However, the statement is true without the reflexivity assumption and the construction in his proof directly follows. Hence, we drop reflexivity. 40 of (x, y). By construction P = R = Y × Y c. Hence (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R for all (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ Y × Y c. This furnishes us a contradiction to the fragility of R. This completes the proof of (d)⇒ (a). Now, pick an arbitrary pair in (x, y) ∈ P c = Rc = (Y × Y ) ∪ (Y c × Y c) ∪ (Y c × Y ) . Since P c is open, this furnishes us a contradiction to sensitivity of R. This completes the proof of (e)⇒ (a). (f ) ⇒ (a) Assume X is disconnected. Then there exist Y, Y c non-empty and open subsets of X. Define P = Y × Y c. It is clear that P is asymmetric. Define a function u : X → R as u(x) = 0 if x ∈ Y and u(x) = 1 if x ∈ Y c. Since Y and Y c are open, u is continuous. Moreover u(x) < u(y) if and only if (x, y) ∈ Y × Y c = P, hence P has a continuous dual-representation. We will now show that P is not strongly separable. The relation R = {(x, y) (y, x) /∈ P} is then defined as R = (Y × Y ) ∪ (Y × Y c) ∪ (Y c × Y c). Pick (x, y) ∈ P. Then x ∈ Y and y ∈ Y c. By construction of R, for all x(cid:48) ∈ X, if x(cid:48) ∈ P (x), then x(cid:48) ∈ Y c. Similarly, for all y(cid:48) ∈ X, if y(cid:48) ∈ P −1(y), then y(cid:48) ∈ Y. Hence (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ Y c × Y for all x(cid:48) ∈ P (x) and y(cid:48) ∈ P −1(y). It follows from Y c × Y = Rc that (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) /∈ R for all x(cid:48) ∈ P (x) and y(cid:48) ∈ P −1(y). Therefore P is not strongly separable. (g) ⇒ (a) The proof follows from (f) ⇒ (a) above. The proof of Theorem 4 is complete. We finally turn to the proof of Proposition 3. Before that we need the following notation and a lemma. A binary relation is said to be an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. Let I be an equivalence relation on a set X, [x] = {x(cid:48) ∈ X (x, x(cid:48)) ∈ I} denote the equivalence class of x and the space XI the quotient space of X with respect to the relation I. Let π : X → XI denote the corresponding quotient map defined as π(x) = [x]. Let τ be a topology on X. Then the quotient topology is defined as τ = {U ⊂ XI π−1(U ) ∈ τ}. Hence, a set A in XI is open if and only if π−1(A) is open (in X). Equivalently, a set A in XI is closed if and only if π−1(A) is closed. For any binary relation R on a set X whose symmetric part I is an equivalence relation, define an induced relation R on XI as ([x], [y]) ∈ R if (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R for all x(cid:48) ∈ [x] and y(cid:48) ∈ [y]. Define I as the symmetric part of R and P as its asymmetric part. Lemma 4. Let R be a semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on a topological space X such that its symmetric part I is an equivalence relation. Then the induced relation R on XI is anti-symmetric and continuous. Proof of Lemma 4. The semi-transitivity of R implies that ([x], [y]) ∈ R if and only if (x, y) ∈ R. One of the directions is implied by the definition of R. In order to prove the other direction, assume (x, y) ∈ R. Then either (y, x) ∈ R or (y, x) /∈ R. If (y, x) ∈ R, then (x, y) ∈ I. Since I is transitive, (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ I for all x(cid:48) ∈ [x] and y(cid:48) ∈ [y]. If (y, x) /∈ R, then (x, y) ∈ P. Since R is semi-transitive, therefore (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ P for all x(cid:48) ∈ [x] and y(cid:48) ∈ [y]. Hence, the definitions of I and P imply that (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R for all x(cid:48) ∈ [x] and y(cid:48) ∈ [y]. Therefore, ([x], [y]) ∈ P if and only if (x, y) ∈ P. The anti-symmetry of R directly follows from ([x], [y]) ∈ R if and only if (x, y) ∈ R. Recall that the quotient map π is defined as π(x) = [x]. Then π−1( R([x])) = {y : ([x], [y]) ∈ R} = {y : (x, y) ∈ R} = R(x). Analogously, π−1( R−1([x])) = R−1(x), π−1( P ([x])) = P (x) and π−1( P −1([x])) = P −1(x) for all x ∈ X. Therefore, R has closed sections and P has open sections. Proof of Proposition 3. Assume X is topological space and R is a complete, semi-transitive and continuous binary relation on it. It follows from Sen (1969, Theorem I) that its symmetric 41 part I is transitive. Define a binary relation R on the quotient space XI as ([x], [y]) ∈ R if and only if (x(cid:48), y(cid:48)) ∈ R for all x(cid:48) ∈ [x] and all y(cid:48) ∈ [y]. The definition of the induced relation R on the quotient space implies its completeness. It follows from Lemma 4 that R is anti-symmetric and continuous. Pick [x], [y] ∈ XI such that [x] (cid:54)= [y]. Assume without loss of generality that [x] ∈ P ([y]). If there exists z ∈ X such that [z] ∈ P ([y]) ∩ P −1([x]), then [x] ∈ P ([z]) and y ∈ P −1(z). Hence, P ([z]) and P −1([z]) are disjoint and open neighborhoods of [x] and [y], respectively. If P ([y]) ∩ P −1([x]) = ∅, then [x] ∈ P ([y]) and [y] ∈ P −1([x]) imply P ([y]) and P −1([x]) are disjoint and open neighborhoods of [x] and [y], respectively.64 References Anand, P. (1987): "Are the preference axioms really rational?," Theory and Decision, 23(2), 189 -- 214. (1993): "The philosophy of intransitive preference," The Economic Journal, 103(417), 337 -- 346. Arrow, K. J., and G. Debreu (1954): "Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive econ- omy," Econometrica, pp. 265 -- 290. Arrow, K. J., A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura (1995, 1996): Social Choice Re-examained, vol. 1 and 2. New York: St. Martin's Press. (2002, 2011): Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1 and 2. North Holland: Elsevier. Barten, A. P., and V. Bohm (1982): "Consumer theory," Handbook of Mathematical Eco- nomics, 2, 381 -- 429. Bergstrom, T. C., R. P. Parks, and T. Rader (1976): "Preferences which have open graphs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 3(3), 265 -- 268. Bernheim, B. D., and A. Rangel (2009): "Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 51 -- 104. Bleichrodt, H., C. Li, I. Moscati, and P. P. Wakker (2016): "Nash was a first to axiomatize expected utility," Theory and Decision, 81(3), 309 -- 312. Bridges, D. S., and G. B. Mehta (1995): Representations of Preference Orderings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Broome, J. (1972): "Approximate equilibrium in economies with indivisible commodities," Journal of Economic Theory, 5(2), 224 -- 249. Brown, R. (2006): "Groupoids, the Phragmen-Brouwer property, and the Jordan curve theo- rem," Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures, 1(1). 64A similar result for anti-symmetric binary relations is provided by Eilenberg (1941, 1.4). 42 Brown, R., and O. A. Camarena (2015): "Erratum to: Groupoids, the Phragmen -- Brouwer property, and the Jordan curve theorem," Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures, 10(3), 669 -- 672. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., and E. A. Ok (2018): "The Rational Core of Preference Relations," Working Paper. Chateauneuf, A. (1987): "Continuous representation of a preference relation on a connected topological space," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16(2), 139 -- 146. Dasgupta, P., and E. Maskin (1986): "The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous eco- nomic games, I: Theory, II: Applications," The Review of Economic Studies, 53(1), 1 -- 41. Debreu, G. (1952): "A social equilibrium existence theorem," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 38(10), 886 -- 893. (1954): "Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function," in Decision Processes, ed. by M. Thrall, R. Davis, and C. Coombs, pp. Chapter 11, 159 -- 165. New York: Wiley. (1960): "Topological methods in cardinal utility theory," in Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, ed. by K. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes, pp. 16 -- 26. California: Stanford University Press. (1982): "Existence of competitive equilibrium," Handbook of Mathematical Economics, 2, 697 -- 743. Dickman Jr., R. F. (1984): "A strong form of the Phragmen-Brouwer theorem," Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 90(2), 333 -- 337. Dierker, E. (1971): "Equilibrium analysis of exchange economies with indivisible commodi- ties," Econometrica, pp. 997 -- 1008. Dubra, J. (2011): "Continuity and completeness under risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, 61(1), 80 -- 81. Dubra, J., F. Maccheroni, and E. A. Ok (2004): "Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom," Journal of Economic Theory, 115(1), 118 -- 133. Duggan, J. (2013): "Uncovered sets," Social Choice and Welfare, 41(3), 489 -- 535. Dugundji, J. (1966): Topology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Edelman, P. H., and R. E. Jamison (1985): "The theory of convex geometries," Geometriae Dedicata, 19(3), 247 -- 270. Eilenberg, S. (1941): "Ordered topological spaces," American Journal of Mathematics, 63(1), 39 -- 45. Eliaz, K., and E. A. Ok (2006): "Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, 56(1), 61 -- 86. Evren, O. (2014): "Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations," Journal of Economic Theory, 151, 30 -- 63. Fishburn, P. C. (1970): "Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey," Operations 43 Research, 18(2), 207 -- 228. (1972): Mathematics of Decision Theory. The Hauge: Mouton. Fleurbaey, M., and D. Blanchet (2013): Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fleurbaey, M., M. Salles, and J. Weymark (2006): Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Galaabaatar, T., and E. Karni (2013): "Subjective expected utility with incomplete pref- erences," Econometrica, 81(1), 255 -- 284. Galaabaatar, T., M. A. Khan, and M. Uyanık (2018): "Completeness and transitivity of preferences on mixture sets," working paper. Gerasimou, G. (2010): "Consumer theory with bounded rational preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46(5), 708 -- 714. (2013): "On continuity of incomplete preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, 41(1), 157 -- 167. (2015): "(Hemi) continuity of additive preference preorders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 58, 79 -- 81. (2017): "Indecisiveness, undesirability and overload revealed through rational choice deferral," The Economic Journal, Online. Ghirardato, P., F. Maccheroni, M. Marinacci, and M. Siniscalchi (2003): "A sub- jective spin on roulette wheels," Econometrica, 71(6), 1897 -- 1908. Gilboa, I. (2009): Theory of Decision Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gorman, W. M. (1968): "The structure of utility functions," The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367 -- 390. Gorno, L. (2018): "The structure of incomplete preferences," Economic Theory, 66(1), 159 -- 185. Harsanyi, J. C. (1955): "Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal compar- isons of utility," Journal of Political Economy, 63(4), 309 -- 321. Herstein, I. N., and J. Milnor (1953): "An axiomatic approach to measurable utility," Econometrica, 21(2), 291 -- 297. Herv´es-Beloso, C., and H. del Valle-Incl´an Cruces (2018): "Continuous preferfence orderings representable by utility functions," Journal of Economic Surveys. Jackson, M. O. (2008): Socal and Economic Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Karni, E. (2014): "Axiomatic foundations of expected utility and subjective probability," in Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1, pp. 1 -- 39. Elsevier. Khan, M. A., and Y. Sun (1990): "On a reformulation of Cournot-Nash equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 146(2), 442 -- 460. (2002): "Non-cooperative games with many players," Handbook of Game Theory with 44 Economic Applications, 3, 1761 -- 1808. Khan, M. A., and M. Uyanık (2018): "On the existence of continuous binary relations on a topological space," University of Queensland, mimeo. Khan, M. A., and A. Yamazaki (1981): "On the cores of economies with indivisible com- modities and a continuum of traders," Journal of Economic Theory, 24(2), 218 -- 225. Lorimer, P. (1967): "A note on orderings," Econometrica, pp. 537 -- 539. Luce, R. D. (1956): "Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination," Econometrica, pp. 178 -- 191. Magyarkuti, G. (2010): "Revealed preferences: A topological approach," Journal of Mathe- matical Economics, 46(3), 320 -- 325. Majumdar, M., and A. Sen (1976): "A note on representing partial orderings," The Review of Economic Studies, 43(3), 543 -- 545. Malinvaud, E. (1952): "Note on von Neumann-Morgenstern's strong independence axiom," Econometrica, p. 679. Marschak, J. (1950): "Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility," Econo- metrica, pp. 111 -- 141. Mas-Colell, A. (1974): "An equilibrium existence theorem without complete or transitive preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(3), 237 -- 246. Mas-Colell, A. (1975): "A model of equilibrium with differentiated commodities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2(2), 263 -- 295. (1977): "Indivisible commodities and general equilibrium theory," Journal of Economic Theory, 16(2), 443 -- 456. Mas-Colell, A., and W. R. Zame (1991): "Equilibrium theory in infinite dimensional spaces," Handbook of Mathematical Economics, 4, 1835 -- 1898. McGehee, R. (1992): "Attractors for closed relations on compact Hausdorff spaces," Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 41(4), 1165 -- 1209. McKenzie, L. W. (2005): Classical General Equilibrium Theory, vol. 1. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Mehta, G. B. (1998): "Preference and utility," Handbook of Utility Theory: Principles, 1, 1 -- 47. Moldau, J. H. (1996): "A simple existence proof of demand functions without standard tran- sitivity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 25(3), 325 -- 333. Narens, L. (1985): Abstract Measurement Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Nash, J. F. (1950a): "The bargaining problem," Econometrica, pp. 155 -- 162. (1950b): "Equilibrium points in n-person games," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48 -- 49. Newman, M. E. J. (2006): "Modularity and community structure in networks," Proceedings of the National Academy Sciemces, USA, 103(23). 45 Nishimura, H., and E. A. Ok (2016): "Utility representation of an incomplete and nontran- sitive preference relation," Journal of Economic Theory, 166, 8577 -- 8582. (2018): "Preference structures," Discussion paper, Mimeo. Peleg, B. (1970): "Utility functions for partially ordered topological spaces," Econometrica, 38(1), 93 -- 96. Pfanzagl, J. (1971): Theory of Measurement. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Rader, T. (1963): "The existence of a utility function to represent preferences," The Review of Economic Studies, 30(3), 229 -- 232. Reny, P. J. (1999): "On the existence of pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria in discon- tinuous games," Econometrica, 67(5), 1029 -- 1056. Richter, M., and A. Rubinstein (2015): "Back to fundamentals: Equilibrium in abstract economies," American Economic Review, 105(8), 2570 -- 94. Samuelson, P. A. (1981): "Bergsonian welfare economics," in Economic welfare and the eco- nomics of Soviet socialism: essays in honor of Abram Bergson, ed. by S. Rosefields, pp. 223 -- 266. New York: Cambridge University Press. Schmeidler, D. (1969): "Competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders and incomplete preferences," Econometrica, pp. 578 -- 585. (1971): "A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations," Economet- rica, 39(2), 403 -- 404. Sen, A. (1969): "Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions," The Review of Economic Studies, 36(3), 381 -- 393. (1993): "Internal consistency of choice," Econometrica, 61(3), 495 -- 521. (2017): Collective Choice and Social Welfare: An Expanded Edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Shafer, W. (1974): "Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences," Econo- metrica, 42(5), 913 -- 919. Shafer, W., and H. Sonnenschein (1975): "Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2(3), 345 -- 348. Sonnenschein, H. (1965): "The relationship between transitive preference and the structure of the choice space," Econometrica, 33(3), 624 -- 634. (1967): "Reply to "A Note on Orderings"," Econometrica, 35(3, 4), 540. (1971): "Demand theory without transitive indiference with applications to the theory of competitive equilibrium," in Preferences, Utility and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium, ed. by J. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. Richter, and H. Sonenschein, pp. 215 -- 234. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Strzalecki, T. (2013): "Temporal resolution of uncertainty and recursive models of ambiguity aversion," Econometrica, 81(3), 1039 -- 1074. Suzumura, K. (2016): Choice, Preferences and Procedures. Cambridge: Harvard University 46 Press. Temkin, L. S. (2015): Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thomson, W. (2011): "Fair allocation rules," in Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 2, pp. 393 -- 506. Elsevier. Tourky, R., and N. C. Yannelis (2000): "Markets with many more agents than commodities: Aumann's "hidden" assumption," Journal of Economic Theory, 101(1), 189 -- 221. Tullock, G. (1964): "The irrationality of intransitivity," Oxford Economic Papers, 16(3), 401 -- 406. Ullman-Margalit, E., and S. Morgenbesser (1977): "Picking and choosing," Social Re- search, 44(4), 757 -- 785. Uzawa, H. (1960): Preference and Rational Choice in the Theory of Consumption. Stanford University Press. Vind, K. (2003): Independence, Additivity, Uncertainty. With contributions by B. Grodal. Berlin: Springer. von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern (1947): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2nd edn. Wakker, P. (1988a): "The algebraic versus the topological approach to additive representa- tions," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32(4), 421 -- 435. (1988b): "Continuity of preference relations for separable topologies," International Economic Review, 29(1), 105 -- 110. Wakker, P. P. (1989): Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ward, L. (1954): "Partially ordered topological spaces," Proceedings of the American Mathe- matical Society, 5(1), 144 -- 161. Wilder, R. L. (1949): Topology of Manifolds. Berlin: American Mathematical Society Collo- quium Publications XXXII. 47
1905.02073	1	1905	2019-05-06T14:49:58	When abstinence increases prevalence	[ "econ.TH" ]	In the pool of people seeking partners, a uniformly greater preference for abstinence increases the prevalence of infection and worsens everyone's welfare. In contrast, prevention and treatment reduce prevalence and improve payoffs. The results are driven by adverse selection: people who prefer more partners are likelier disease carriers. A given decrease in the number of matches is a smaller proportional reduction for people with many partners, thus increases the fraction of infected in the pool. The greater disease risk further decreases partner-seeking and payoffs.	econ.TH	econ	When abstinence increases prevalence 9 1 0 2 y a M 6 Sander Heinsalu∗ May 7, 2019 Abstract ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 3 7 0 2 0 . 5 0 9 1 : v i X r a In the pool of people seeking partners, a uniformly greater preference for abstinence increases the prevalence of infection and worsens everyone's welfare. In contrast, pre- vention and treatment reduce prevalence and improve payoffs. The results are driven by adverse selection -- people who prefer more partners are likelier disease carriers. A given decrease in the number of matches is a smaller proportional reduction for people with many partners, thus increases the fraction of infected in the pool. The greater disease risk further decreases partner-seeking and payoffs. Keywords: Adverse selection, asymmetric information, epidemiology, infectious dis- ease. JEL classification: D82, D83, C72. Abstinence education is a widespread policy aiming to combat sexually transmitted dis- eases (STDs) and unwanted pregnancy. This paper contrasts the consequences of abstinence with preventive measures (inoculation, condoms) and treatment in an economic epidemiol- ogy model. Despite seeming similarity, abstinence has the opposite effect to vaccines and cures on disease prevalence and the welfare of people with any preference intensity for an increased number of partners. The goal of abstinence programs is to change preferences towards reducing the number of sex partners. If those with fewer partners reduce their number of matches more, then the prevalence of the disease among the active partner-seekers increases. The reason is adverse ∗Research School of Economics, Australian National University. HW Arndt Building, 25a Kingsley St, Acton ACT 2601, Australia. Email: [email protected], website: https://sanderheinsalu.com/ The author thanks George Mailath, Rakesh Vohra, Steven Matthews and Andrew Postlewaite for comments and suggestions and the University of Pennsylvania for its hospitality during part of this work. 1 selection: those most eager to match are the likeliest to be infected. The abstinence inter- vention and preference-based behaviour modification are complementary to those considered in the previous literature and imply different welfare consequences. A change in prevalence among match-seekers analogous to that induced by partial ab- stinence of the low-activity people occurs when the disease carriers choose to have more partners. For example, treatment partly restores their health, thus the ability to search for contacts, which was previously reduced by illness. Given any preferences, a decrease in the fraction infected cannot increase prevalence in the pool of match-seekers in the short run, even though the optimal number of partners chosen increases in response. The direct effect of the decreased infections is never overwhelmed by the indirect effect of a greater probability of matching, because if the new higher rate of matches raises the weighted prevalence in the pool of partner-seekers to its original level, then the best responses are the same as initially. At the initial numbers of matches, the smaller infected fractions imply a reduced prevalence in the pool. By a similar revealed preference reasoning, vaccines always increase payoffs in the short run: the same number of partners as before the vaccine introduction is still a feasible choice, now with a lower chance of infection. This contrasts with a change in preferences towards fewer partners, for example due to abstinence counselling, which may increase prevalence and reduce the payoffs of all types, whether evaluated at the old or the new utility function. Even after compensating for the direct effect of a reduced benefit from matching, the payoff of all types may fall due to the indirect effect of greater prevalence (riskier partners). In addition to abstinence education which specifically targets sexually transmitted dis- eases, governments try to control other epidemics using 'social distancing policies' designed to reduce the population's meeting rate. Examples are public announcements telling people to stay home, closing of schools and mass transit. Exhorting people to avoid public places aims to change preferences, similarly to abstinence education, but school and transit clo- sures try to directly reduce contacts, thus disease transmission, analogously to prevention and treatment. The seemingly similar social distancing policies have opposite effects, just like abstinence and medical interventions. If those with low social activity respond more to public messages, then disease prevalence among people still meeting each other increases, so infections rise. By contrast, decreasing contact rates through closing schools and mass transit reduces disease transmission. The literature, discussed next, has mostly focussed on infection rates and medical inter- ventions, but is increasingly considering welfare and incentives as well. 2 Literature The pathbreaking work of Kremer (1996) studied how the chosen matching probabilities and the disease prevalence in the pool of partner-seekers respond to infection rates. The present paper uses Kremer's two-type model to answer the complementary questions of how abstinence education affects prevalence, the number of partners and the payoffs of people with different preferences for matching. The effects of abstinence programs operate via the utility function, and contrast with the effects of prevention and treatment, which work via infection rates. Abstinence education modifies preferences, which changes choices. An agent who expects altered actions of others in turn changes his best response, and this indirect influence may strengthen or overturn the original direct effect of modifying the utility function. The current paper derives the optimal number of partners from preferences, accounting for the feedback from the composition of the matching pool to the choices. By contrast, Whitaker and Renton (1992); Kremer (1994); Kremer and Morcom (1998) take the frequency of partner change as given, thus assume the absence of the indirect effect of interacting best responses. Reducing the number of partners for people with low activity increases the average probability of infection in the pool of available matches. The present paper qualifies this result when the probability of finding a partner is endogenous -- a greater preference for abstinence may counterintuitively increase the number of matches (Example 1). This interesting effect has not been examined in the epidemiology literature, to the best of the author's knowledge. Heinsalu (2017, 2018) show a similar counterintuitive comparative static for informed sellers investing to gain (earlier) access to a market of uninformed buyers -- lower costs may reduce trade and profits. Investment to enter the market is similar to the cost of finding matches (or satiation in the number of partners) in the present work. Expected quality in the market is analogous to the negative of the infection prevalence in the partner pool. Reducing the production cost of the seller types resembles increasing the desire for more matches. In Fenichel (2013), agents' preferences depend on their health status, which may change endogenously from susceptible to infected and from infected to immune (no other transi- tions are possible). Infected and immune individuals do not behave strategically, unlike in the current work where all types optimise. Fenichel studies social distancing policies for a benevolent planner who chooses agents' behaviour, with or without the constraint of identical action change for all health statuses. This constraint differs from restricting the planner to provide to identical incentives to reduce contacts (one of the policies considered in the current paper), because types with unequal utility functions respond differently to the same incentives. The present paper complements Fenichel (2013) by comparing policies 3 that change preferences to those cutting infection rates. For disease prevalence, reducing infections is equivalent to decreasing the number of contacts directly, but the welfare effects are the opposite. Involuntary behaviour change tends to decrease utility, but a lower risk of infection improves welfare. In Greenwood et al. (2017), in each period people search (at a cost) first in the mar- riage market, then in markets for unprotected and protected sex. Married agents' sex is assumed unprotected, but monogamous, in contrast to the present paper where all agents can search for partners and, conditional on infection, have the same transmission probability. Greenwood et al. (2017) focus on long run steady states and assume everyone knows his or In numerical simulations, increasing the her infection status, unlike in the current work. utility of marriage (e.g. by abstinence education) or reducing exogenous divorces decreases disease prevalence. By contrast, the present paper shows analytically when abstinence in- creases prevalence and reduces welfare. Talam`as and Vohra (2019) focus on vaccination, not abstinence, in a commonly known social network where homogeneous agents choose who to partner with. In the current work, In Talam`as and Vohra (2019), partially effective heterogeneous people match randomly. vaccines may make the best stable network more connected, increasing disease transmission and worsening welfare -- the opposite of the current paper. Risk choices in their network are strategic complements: an agent with more promiscuous partners has a lower marginal cost of adding risky interactions, because of a greater probability of being already infected. In the present work, contact frequencies are strategic substitutes for high-risk types, but com- plements for low-risk. Decreasing the benefit from matching in Talam`as and Vohra (2019) would reduce stable network connectivity and disease prevalence -- the opposite outcome to the present work. Other theoretical articles modelling infection rates and immunisation include Galeotti and Rogers (2013); Chen and Toxvaerd (2014); Rowthorn and Toxvaerd (2017); Goyal and Vigier (2015); Goyal et al. (2016); Toxvaerd (2019). The current paper complements this literature by con- sidering welfare and disease prevalence under both abstinence programs and vaccination. Empirically, Underhill et al. (2007) find that among 13 trials of abstinence programs for a total of 15940 US youths, most had no effect, one reduced vaginal sex in the short term and one increased the frequency of STDs in both the short and the long term. The current paper theoretically explains how abstinence education that influences low-risk people more increases disease prevalence. In the data, those with less sexual experience are affected more by abstinence education. For example, Jemmott III et al. (1998) find that abstinence programs reduce the frequency of sex more among those with a lower baseline. The reduction is statistically significant after 3 months, but not after 6 or 12. The abstinence-only intervention 4 in Jemmott et al. (2010) delayed first-time sex, but did not influence the average number of partners, condom use or other outcomes. Bruckner and Bearman (2005) find that those making an abstinence pledge delay first-time sex, but have insignificantly higher STD rates. In O'Donnell et al. (1999), at 6- and 12-month follow-up after safer-sex interventions, the reduction in the probability of intercourse in the previous 3 months is proportionally larger (but in absolute terms, smaller) for adolescents who are virgins at baseline. Analogously to an increased preference for abstinence, bad health may lead to a lower desire for sex. Lakdawalla et al. (2006) empirically show that advances in treatment caused better health for HIV carriers, which increased their sexual activity and rekindled HIV spread. Social disapproval of (some varieties of) sex has an effect similar to a preference for abstinence. Francis and Mialon (2010) find that tolerance for sexual minorities is negatively associated with the HIV rate, leads low-risk gay men to enter the pool partners, and more active men to choose less risky behaviours. Auld (1996, 2006) show that during the 1982 -- 1984 AIDS outbreak in San Francisco, the average number of sex partners for gay men fell by a third, but the standard deviation and skewness increased. Thus high-activity individuals responded less to an increase in the perceived infection probability, as in the model below. 1 Search for partners in an adversely selected pool The model and notation follow Kremer (1996). Each person has a type k ∈ {H, L} (interpret H as high-risk, L as low), with fraction αk being type k. Type is private information, but the fractions are commonly known. Each type chooses the probability ik ∈ [0, 1] of matching with a partner per unit of time.1 The fraction of type k people who are infected is denoted Yk, with YH > YL ≥ 0. The probability that a randomly chosen partner carries the disease is then (1) W := αH iHYH + αLiLYL αHiH + αLiL . Normalise the cost of infection times the probability of catching the disease from an infected contact to 1 w.l.o.g., so the marginal cost of matching with a random partner is W for an uninfected individual. The payoff of type k is πk(ik) = ikθk − ψi2 2 and θH > θL > 0. The marginal benefit θk − 2ψik of matching with more partners strictly decreases in the k − ikW , where ψ ≥ θH −YL 2 1By re-normalising the unit of time, choosing the probability of a match is equivalent to choosing the number of partners per unit of time. 2The assumption ψ ≥ θH −YL 2 is sufficient for ik < 1 (interior solution) and is implicit in Kremer (1996) 5 number of partners, interpreted as a satiation effect or as an increasing cost of effort of finding matches. Interpret changes in behaviour ik at constant infection rates Yk as occurring in the short run. Feedback from behaviour to the fraction carrying the disease (Yk changing in response to ik) is interpreted as taking place in the long run. For example, the susceptible-infected (SI) models in epidemiology focus on the long run. Feedback from the chosen matching probabilities ik to the composition W of the pool of active partner-seekers naturally occurs in the short run (the mix of people found in a singles bar changes as soon as behaviour does), and this is the focus from now on. H , i∗ L and W ∗ s.t. i∗ Equilibrium consists of i∗ k maximises πk(ik) given W ∗, which in turn is derived from i∗ k using (1). Based on πk(ik), the best responses to any W satisfy iH ≥ iL, and if iL > 0, then iH > iL. Equilibria in which iL = 0 are called L-inactive and those in which iL > 0 both-active. The next section studies the existence and properties of equilibria, followed by the comparative statics that constitute the main result. 2 The effects of abstinence and treatment on search and welfare This section first establishes the existence of equilibria and their regions of uniqueness. It then proceeds to analyse the stable equilibria, often focussing on the Pareto dominant one. The following result (Proposition I. of Kremer (1996)) describes when different equilib- rium combinations exist. Proposition 1. 1) If YH < θL, then a unique equilibrium exists, with iL > 0. 2) If θL < YH < θL − θH + [θL − αLYL]/αH and [θL − αH(θH − θL) − αLYL − αHYH]2 − 4αH(θH − θL)(θL − YH) > 0, then there exists one L-inactive and two both-active equilibria. 3) If θL < YH > θL − θH + [θL − αLYL]/αH, then a unique equilibrium exists, with iL = 0. Equilibria are Pareto ranked in reverse order of weighted prevalence W ∗, both for a given set of parameters and, fixing ψ, θH, across parameters, as shown next. k) than an equi- k. Fix ψ, θH , then any equilibrium with a lower W ∗ has a higher k has a higher πk(i∗ Lemma 2. Fix ψ, then any equilibrium with a higher i∗ librium with a lower i∗ i∗ k. Eq. (4), which otherwise becomes ik = minnimax, maxn θk−W 2ψ , 0oo. 6 Proof. Substitute the FOC i∗ k = maxn0, θk−W ∗ 2ψ o into πk, which becomes ψi∗2 Changing parameters other than θk only affects i∗ ∂i∗ ∂W ∗ < 0 and ∂W ∗ L ∂θL < 0, an equilibrium with a lower W ∗ has a higher i∗ L. k via W ∗, and di∗ k k , with dπk dW ∗ < 0. Due to ∂i∗ L ∂θL di∗ k > 0. > 0, Intuitively, both types reduce activity in response to greater disease incidence, and by re- vealed preference become worse off, because the match probability chosen at high prevalence could be chosen at low and would yield greater utility than at high. The optimal match probability at a low infection rate leads to an even larger payoff. It is natural for people to coordinate on the Pareto dominant equilibrium, which by Lemma 2 has the greatest probability of matching and the lowest prevalence of infection. With multiple equilibria, the one with the second-highest i∗ k is unstable, as shown in Lemma 4 in the Appendix. Focus on stable equilibria from now on. The following main result examines how equilibria change in response to abstinence, prevention or treatment. Treatment is interpreted as directly reducing infection rates Yk among both types, possibly by different amounts. The cost of infection also falls when treatment is available, which is equivalent to a proportional fall in both Yk. Preventative measures decrease the probability of catching the disease given Yk, which has the same effect as a proportional reduction in Yk. Thus the direct effects of preventions and cures may both be modelled as decreasing YH and YL. The indirect effect of treatment is that both types increase their probability of matching in response to a lower perceived risk of infection. As shown next in Proposition 3, this indirect effect cannot outweigh the direct in the short run.3 Thus preventions and cures always cut the weighted prevalence in the pool of active partner-seekers. The welfare of all types increases as a result (Lemma 2: payoffs increase in the matching probabilities). By contrast, changing preferences towards abstinence (reducing θk) may increase the fraction of infected in the pool and decrease matching and the payoffs under both the old and the new utility function. , di∗ k dθL ≥ 0, di∗ L dθH Proposition 3. In any stable equilibrium, dW ∗ dYk ≤ 0 ≤ dW ∗ ≤ 0, and increasing θH less than θL reduces W ∗ and increases i∗ k. dθH In any L-inactive equilibrium, di∗ . If a decrease in θH, Yk or an increase in θL H dθH changes the equilibrium set, then the stable equilibrium with the greatest W ∗ disappears or a stable equilibrium with a new smallest W ∗ appears. ≤ 0 for k, k ∈ {H, L}, and dW ∗ dθL ≥ 0 = dW ∗ dθH ≥ 0, di∗ k dYk The proof of Proposition 3 is in the Appendix. The proposition shows that reducing θL weakly more than θH (the empirically observed change) increases weighted prevalence 3In the long run, feedback from the matching probabilities ik to the fractions infected Yk may overwhelm the initial direct effect of lower Yk and thereby increase the disease rate (Kremer, 1994). 7 in the pool and reduces both types' activity and payoffs. The direct effect of abstinence education is a lower benefit θk1 ≤ θk0 from match-seeking, which for any prevalence W and search intensity ik reduces the payoff, as evaluated at the new utility function πk1(ik) = (θk1 − W )ik − ψi2 k. The indirect effect of the changing composition of the pool of partners strengthens the direct effect when the low types reduce their activity more, because then W increases. At the old utility function πk0, the new optimal activity level i∗ k1 was available but not chosen, thus by revealed preference payoffs decrease when evaluated at the old utility function: πk0(i∗ k0) ≥ πk0(i∗ k1) ≥ πk1(i∗ k1). Even if both types are compensated for the direct decrease in their benefit, their payoffs may fall (Example 2 in the Appendix). Compensation means adding the benefit change times the initial activity level (θk0 − θk1)i∗ k0 to the payoff πk1 after the change.4 In reality, the compensation may be interpreted as an increased utility from alternative activities in response to abstinence education that reduces enjoyment of casual sex. This 'preference substitution' is unlikely to be large enough in practice to keep people's payoff constant when they do not change their activity level, so the compensation considered above should be thought of as an upper bound. In Proposition 3, a sufficient condition for prevalence to fall and the probabilities of matching to increase after intensifying the preference for a greater number of partners is that the benefit from more matches increases less for high-activity people. This condition may be weakened, but cannot be omitted entirely, as shown next. Raising θH always increases prevalence and may reduce both types' matching probabilities and payoffs, as the following example demonstrates. Example 1. Take ψ = 0.1, αk = 0.5, YL = 0.1, YH = 0.6, θL = 0.45. If θH0 = 0.46, then in the unique stable equilibrium, (i∗ 0 ≈ 0.38, but if θH1 = 0.47, H1) ≈ (0.34, 0.44) and W ∗ then (i∗ H0) ≈ (0.43, 0.48) and W ∗ L0, i∗ 1 ≈ 0.36. L1, i∗ Adding a small enough increase in θL to Example 1 does not overturn the qualitative result that a greater benefit from finding a partner increases disease prevalence in the pool of match-seekers and reduces the matching rates and payoffs. Reducing people's benefit θkik − ψi2 k from an interaction directly decreases their payoff, but Example 1 shows that the indirect effect of the changing composition of the pool of partners may overturn the direct effect. This counterintuitive comparative static illustrates that taking preferences into account may yield diametrically different predictions from assuming fixed behaviour (e.g. the exogenous number of partners in Kremer (1994)). 4Reimbursing agents for the utility loss at their original choice is analogous to a Slutsky compensated price change in consumer theory. In a single agent decision, by revealed preference, payoff cannot decrease after Slutsky compensation. In the game in this paper, the externality of rising disease prevalence in response to lower benefits from matching may be sufficiently strong to outweigh the compensation. 8 To complete the comparative statics in Proposition 3, the following argument establishes another interesting prediction of Kremer (1996): an increase in the matching cost ψ (faster satiation) does not affect prevalence in any equilibrium nor change the set of equilibria. In L-inactive equilibria, W ∗ = YH and i∗ H remains positive for all ψ. In both-active equilibria, with linear marginal cost, positive matching probabilities i∗ k fall proportionately in ψ, which leaves W ∗ unchanged, thus has no indirect effect or feedback to i∗ k. Payoffs and matching probabilities of course decrease in ψ in any equilibrium. L are constant in ψ, and i∗ Arguments in Kremer (1996) often rely on equiproportionate reductions in activity by the types, for example in response to rising weighted prevalence in the pool. To the author's knowledge, the literature has not pointed out that increasing the satiation parameter ψ causes such proportional reductions. It is worth mentioning that for both-active equilibria, the result relies on the quadratic cost of search. However, the arguments using proportionally decreasing matching probabilities still hold when low types reduce their activity by a greater factor than high, which is the case for a wide class of search costs (satiation functions). Having established the formal results, the next section proceeds to discuss extensions and implications of the model. 3 Discussion The results in the preceding section generalise to a wide variety of strictly convex costs of increasing the matching probability, as may be seen in the similar framework of Heinsalu (2018). That paper also shows that the results change qualitatively when the cost is close to linear, because then the matching probability is always either minimal or maximal. αgH igH +αgLigL The qualitative results remain unchanged when two populations g ∈ {f, m} match with each other, for example females and males. The weighted infection rate in population g is Wg := αgH igH YgH +αgLigLYgL , which is the prevalence in the pool of partners for population g 6= g. Male-to-female HIV transmission rate is higher than the female-to-male rate, which can be captured by β > 1 in the utility function πf k(if k) = (θf k − βWm)if k − ψi2 f k. The factor β also describes different costs of infection between the populations. For example, the human papilloma virus (HPV) harms females more, which corresponds to a greater β. Type k in population g responds to own preferences θgk and the infection rate Wg in the other population. If both populations are subject to similar prevention, treatment or abstinence interventions, then the effects resemble the single population case discussed above. Embedding the short run framework of this paper in an epidemiological SI model is straightforward and allows the infection rates of the types to respond the probability of matching and the weighted prevalence in the pool of partners. In the long run, the additional 9 feedback from infection rates to behaviour may change the comparative statics of vaccination and treatment, as the previous literature shows. The current paper's results from abstinence- caused preference change are reinforced in the long run when higher weighted prevalence in the partner pool increases infection rates for both types. As this paper shows, abstinence programs and other preference-altering social distancing policies may backfire during epidemics, not just in terms of disease prevalence, but also by reducing welfare. On the other hand, medical interventions unambiguously cut infections and improve payoffs, at least in the short run. By the principle of 'first, do no harm', priority should be given to policies directly targeting disease transmission, unless compelling countervailing reasons exist. A Appendix Proof of Proposition 3. In any equilibrium, by definition W ∗ ∈ [YL, YH]. Best responses to k = 0 and W ∗ = YH k = π∗ any W ∗ satisfy i∗ k nor π∗ (worst off-path belief), so the comparative statics are trivial: neither i∗ k responds to parameters, and W ∗ responds only to YH. Suppose W ∗ < θH from now on. H , so W ∗ ≥ αHYH +αLYL. If θH ≤ W ∗, then i∗ L ≤ i∗ Substitute the BR i∗ k = maxn0, θk−W ∗ 2ψ o into (1) to obtain (2) w(W ∗) = αHYH + αLYL max {0, θL − W ∗} /(θH − W ∗) αH + αL max {0, θL − W ∗} /(θH − W ∗) . Equilibria are fixed points of w(·), because both types are best responding to the W ∗ they expect and the resulting w(W ∗) = W ∗ justifies the expectation. If W ∗ ≥ θL, then w′(W ∗) = 0, and if W ∗ < θL, then w′(W ∗) > 0, because < 0. An equilibrium is stable iff w′(W ∗) < 1. θH −W ∗(cid:17) = −θH +W ∗+θL−W ∗ dW ∗ (cid:16) θL−W ∗ d (θH −W ∗)2 To simplify the study of the fixed points of w(·), define δ(W ∗) : = [W ∗ − w(W ∗)][αH (θH − W ∗) + αL max {0, θL − W ∗}] = αH(θH − W ∗)(W ∗ − YH) + αL max {0, θL − W ∗} (W ∗ − YL). The zeroes of δ(W ∗) are the fixed points of w(W ∗), because θH > W ∗, so αH(θH − W ∗) > 0. Clearly δ(YL) < 0 ≤ δ(YH). By continuity of δ, equilibrium exists. An equilibrium with prevalence W ∗ is stable iff δ′(W ∗) > 0. Continuity of δ implies that stable and unstable equilibria alternate. The function δ(·) pointwise increases in θL, αL and decreases in θH , αH , Yk. Increasing a function pointwise shifts the zeroes at which the function increases left and the zeroes at 10 H L H L ≤ 0. = ∂i∗ L ∂θH ∂i∗ k ∂Yk di∗ k dθL = 0, ∂i∗ k ∂θk ∂W ∗ < 0, ∂i∗ ≥ 0 imply the total derivatives di∗ k dYk which the function decreases right (Milgrom and Roberts, 1994). Thus in stable equilibria, W ∗ decreases in θL, αL and increases in θH, αH, Yk (note W ∗ differs from the W defined in (1) and the function w in (2)). The partial derivatives ∂i∗ ∂W ∗ ≤ 0, ∂i∗ ∂ψ ≤ 0, ≤ 0 for k, k ∈ {H, L}, and = 0, ∂i∗ H ∂θL ≥ 0, di∗ L dθH Define δ(W ∗, γ) := αH γ(1 − ǫ)(θH − W ∗)(W ∗ − YH) + αLγ max {0, θL − W ∗} (W ∗ − YL) for ǫ ≥ 0, γ > 0. Then dδ(W ∗,γ) = δ(W ∗, 1) − ǫαH(θH − W ∗)(W ∗ − YH) > δ(W ∗), so at any W ∗ dγ < 0 and di∗ dγ > 0. Due to θH −W ∗ > max {0, θL − W ∗}, increasing both θk by the same amount (or θH k by less than θL) does not increase θH −W ∗ k. In L-inactive, W ∗ = YH, so di∗ H dθH θL−W ∗ , thus reduces W ∗ and increases i∗ > 0. At stable equilibria therefore dW ∗ 0 ) = 0, we have dδ(W ∗ 0 at which δ(W ∗ ∂ψ < 0, ∂i∗ 0 ,γ) dγ > 0. dγ At its smallest and largest zero, δ increases, because δ(YL) < 0 ≤ δ(YH). A pointwise increase in a function that increases at its smallest and largest zero either leaves the set of zeroes unchanged, removes zeroes above the smallest or adds new zeroes below the smallest (Milgrom and Roberts, 1994). By Proposition 1 from Kremer (1996), δ has at most 3 zeroes. Therefore the set of stable equilibria {W ∗ : δ′(W ∗) > 0} shifts down unambiguously when δ increases pointwise. Lemma 4. The equilibrium with the second-lowest W ∗ has dW dW ∗ > 1. k into (1) to obtain W (W ∗) = αH (θH −W ∗)YH +αL max{0,θL−W ∗}YL αH (θH −W ∗)+αL max{0,θL−W ∗} k and the lemma holds vacuously. Sup- Proof. If θH ≤ W ∗, then the unique equilibrium is i∗ pose θH > W ∗ from now on. Substitute i∗ which is continuous. Due to θH > W ∗, the max in i∗ H may be omitted w.l.o.g. Equilib- ria are fixed points W (W ∗) = W ∗. Due to limW ∗→−∞ W (W ∗) = αHYH + αLYL > W ∗, the smallest fixed point W ∗ min < 1. Thus for ǫ > 0 small enough, W (W ∗ 2 − ǫ and dW min + ǫ. For the second-smallest fixed point W ∗ min + ǫ) < W ∗ dW ∗ W =W ∗ 2 > 1. min features dW 2 then W (W ∗ 2 − ǫ) > W ∗ dW ∗ W =W ∗ , Example 2. Let ψ = 0.1, αk = 0.5, YL = 0.1, YH = θL0 = 0.3, θH0 = 0.31, then the chosen matching probabilities are i∗ H0 = 0.525, and the payoffs are π∗ L0 ≈ 0.023, π∗ H0 ≈ 0.028. Reducing the benefit of activity to θL1 = 0.27, θH1 = 0.3 results in i∗ L1 = 0.225, i∗ H1 = 0.375, π∗ L0 ≈ 0.014, (θH0 − θH1)i∗ H1 ≈ 0.014, so Slutsky compensating the types by (θL0−θL1)i∗ H0 ≈ 0.005 is insufficient to raise the payoffs to the initial level. L1 ≈ 0.005, π∗ L0 = 0.475, i∗ References Auld, M. C. (1996): "Choices, beliefs, and infectious disease dynamics," Working paper 938, Queen's University Department of Economics. 11 -- -- -- (2006): "Estimating behavioral response to the AIDS epidemic," The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5. Bruckner, H. and P. Bearman (2005): "After the promise: the STD consequences of adolescent virginity pledges," Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 271 -- 278. Chen, F. and F. Toxvaerd (2014): "The economics of vaccination," Journal of theoretical biology, 363, 105 -- 117. Fenichel, E. P. (2013): "Economic considerations for social distancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic," Journal of health economics, 32, 440 -- 451. Francis, A. M. and H. M. Mialon (2010): "Tolerance and HIV," Journal of Health Economics, 29, 250 -- 267. Galeotti, A. and B. W. Rogers (2013): "Strategic immunization and group structure," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5, 1 -- 32. Goyal, S., S. Jabbari, M. Kearns, S. Khanna, and J. Morgenstern (2016): "Strategic network formation with attack and immunization," in International Confer- ence on Web and Internet Economics, Springer, 429 -- 443. Goyal, S. and A. Vigier (2015): "Interaction, protection and epidemics," Journal of Public Economics, 125, 64 -- 69. Greenwood, J., P. Kircher, C. Santos, and M. Tertilt (2017): "The role of marriage in fighting HIV: a quantitative illustration for Malawi," American Economic Review, 107, 158 -- 62. Heinsalu, S. (2017): "Investing in trading opportunities in dynamic adverse selection," Working paper. -- -- -- (2018): "Investing to access an adverse selection market," Working paper. Jemmott, J. B., L. S. Jemmott, and G. T. Fong (2010): "Efficacy of a theory-based abstinence-only intervention over 24 months: a randomized controlled trial with young adolescents," Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 164, 152 -- 159. Jemmott III, J. B., L. S. Jemmott, and G. T. Fong (1998): "Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized con- trolled trial," Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1529 -- 1536. 12 Kremer, M. (1994): "Can Having Fewer Partners Increase Prevalence of Aids?" Working Paper 4942, National Bureau of Economic Research. -- -- -- (1996): "Integrating behavioral choice into epidemiological models of AIDS," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 549 -- 573. Kremer, M. and C. Morcom (1998): "The effect of changing sexual activity on HIV prevalence," Mathematical biosciences, 151, 99 -- 122. Lakdawalla, D., N. Sood, and D. Goldman (2006): "HIV breakthroughs and risky sexual behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1063 -- 1102. McIntosh, C. (2007): "Has Better Health Care Contributed to Higher HIV Prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa?" Working paper, University of California, San Diego. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1994): "Comparing equilibria," The American Economic Review, 84, 441 -- 459. O'Donnell, L., A. Stueve, A. San Doval, R. Duran, D. Haber, R. Atnafou, N. Johnson, U. Grant, H. Murray, G. Juhn, et al. (1999): "The effectiveness of the Reach for Health Community Youth Service learning program in reducing early and unprotected sex among urban middle school students." American Journal of Public Health, 89, 176 -- 181. Rowthorn, B. R. and F. Toxvaerd (2017): "The optimal control of infectious diseases via prevention and treatment," Discussion Paper DP8925. Talam`as, E. and R. Vohra (2019): "Free and perfectly safe but only partially effective vaccines can harm everyone," Working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Toxvaerd, F. (2019): "Rational disinhibition and externalities in prevention," Interna- tional Economic Review. Underhill, K., P. Montgomery, and D. Operario (2007): "Sexual abstinence only programmes to prevent HIV infection in high income countries: systematic review," British Medical Journal, 335, 248. Whitaker, L. and A. Renton (1992): "A theoretical problem of interpreting the recently reported increase in homosexual gonorrhoea," European Journal of Epidemiology, 8, 187 -- 191. 13
1906.03237	1	1906	2019-06-07T16:51:07	Addictive Auctions: using lucky-draw and gambling addiction to increase participation during auctioning	[ "econ.TH" ]	Auction theories are believed to provide a better selling opportunity for the resources to be allocated. Various organizations have taken measures to increase trust among participants towards their auction system, but trust alone cannot ensure a high level of participation. We propose a new type of auction system which takes advantage of lucky draw and gambling addictions to increase the engagement level of candidates in an auction. Our system makes use of security features present in existing auction systems for ensuring fairness and maintaining trust among participants.	econ.TH	econ	Addictive Auctions: using lucky-draw and gambling addiction to increase participation during auctioning Ravin Kumar [0000-0002-3416-2679] Department of Computer Science, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, meerut- 250005, Uttar Pradesh, India [email protected] Abstract. Auction theories are believed to provide a better selling opportunity for the resources to be allocated. Various organizations have taken measures to increase trust among participants towards their auction system, but trust alone cannot ensure a high level of participation. We propose a new type of auction system which takes advantage of lucky draw and gambling ad- dictions to increase the engagement level of candidates in an auction. Our system makes use of security features present in existing auction systems for ensuring fairness and maintaining trust among participants. Keywords: Auction System, Lucky draw, Gambling Addiction, Auction Addic- tion. 1 Introduction Auction systems are used for allowing authorities to fairly allocate resources among participants based on some defined set of rules. It is a common belief that auction sys- tem helps in allowing seller to gain more profit as it allows groups to compete with each other to obtain a certain resource. Different types of auction systems are devel- oped to maintain the trust of participants in auction systems with the hope of obtain- ing better selling price for the resource. While in other systems such as gambling, a large number of people lose money but still most of the people got addicted to it and keep playing. Similarly, in a lottery-based system, people know that their chance of winning is the same as everyone else but they keep believing that they might win and continue buying lottery tickets. Despite the fact that in gambling and lottery-based systems the majority of the people are destined to losses money without getting any reward, still the participation number is very high with respect to auctions where if someone is allocated the resource than only, they have to pay their bidding amount In this paper, we explored more on the integration of an auction system with gam- bling, and lucky-draw based addictions to design a hybrid type of auction system. This hybrid system contains addictive nature present in lucky draw and gambling sys- tems. We have also studied the effects of our proposed auction systems on the en- gagement of participants and on the selling price of the auctioned resources 2 2 Related Works Y.H. Lee et al. [1] studied the effect of prospect imageability and mental imagery on consumer behavior. H Wardle et al. [2] analyzed the effect of gambling machines on social and economic condition of its locality. A Blaszczynski et al. [3] described gen- eral methods which can be used to reduce the negative impact of gambling and fo- cuses on responsible form of gambling. V Ariyabuddhiphongs et al. [4] explained var- ious forms of gambling and focused on reason which motivates people to buy lottery and against a popular belief he further concluded that big wins tends to improve win- ner's life. Y Mu et al. [5] proposed an internet-based bidding system for sealed-bid auctions fulfilling necessary security requirements without using multiple server sys- tems. CY Olivola et al. [6] used incentive compatible mechanism to compare time vs money preference behavior. WJ Jung et al. [7] focused on studying customer engage- ment using contest based social media marketing. R Zhang et al. [8] proposed a quan- tum system ensuring security in sealed-bid auction. G E Kersten et al. [9] performed a comparative study on auctions and negotiations and then suggested that social effect become much dominant over competitive nature when transparency is provided. AK Naik et al. [10] suggested that auctioneer also plays important role in bidding and some benefits should be given to auctioneers to keep their motivation high which will lead to higher final bidding prices. 3 Proposed auction system Addictive auction system consists of two fundamental concepts of catalysts and recip- ients. The catalysts are the participants who provides some amount of money to the recipients (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Catalyst pays some amount to the recipient. In our method, there is a dynamic list containing Pid and its association with candi- dates and their bidding amount. Each Pid contains details about the amount bid at an instance, along with the bidder details. This dynamic list keeps on updating with ev- ery new bidding during the auctioning. Each Pid gets updated with every new bidding 3 amount introduced by any participant during the auctioning. The Pid of each individual is updated using a simple formula. Pid = T - ni Here, T represents the total number of biddings that took place up to that instant, and ni represents the instances at which each person had bid in the auction. To better un- derstand the concept of Pid , we have provided a sample demonstration. Table 1. Sample demonstration using Catalyst at id = 3 and recipient at id = 0 Instance Pid and associated details 0 1 2 3 4 P0: {Person 1, 100} P0: {Person 2, 150}, P1: {Person 1, 100} P0: {Person 3, 200}, P1: {Person 2, 150}, P2: {Person 1, 100} P0: {Person 1, 250}, P1: {Person 3, 200}, P2: {Person 2, 150}, P3: {Person 1, 100} P0: {Person 3: 400} P1: {Person 1, 250}, P2: {Person 3, 200}, P3: {Person 2, 150}, P4: {Person 1, 100} Catalyst Recipient Null Null Person 1 Person 2 Person 1 Person 3 Person 1 Person 1 Person 2 Person 3 Our system also has a parameter α with a range of (0,1]. This parameter plays a major role in deciding the amount to be paid to the recipient. Before the beginning of the auction, values of α and index of Catalyst (i.e. Pc) are already known to all the partici- pants. Catalyst and recipients are assigned such that the id of catalyst is always greater than that of the recipient. The person with Pid of a catalyst will provide alpha times the amount associated with its id to the recipient. Each new bidding increases the amount that participant with catalyst id have to pay to the recipient. Since the probability of one becoming a catalyst in total of n+1 participant is 1/ (n+1) which is much lower than the possibility of one losing a one-winner based gam- bling i.e. n/(n+1). As the auction progresses, our system motivates more people to take advantage of becoming a recipient. While with each increasing bidding it moti- vates participants with the catalyst Pid to bid higher and move away from the catalyst position. We have provided two varieties of addictive auction systems based on the relation- ships present among the catalysts and recipients and source code for both these vari- ants are available at our github repository [11]. 4 3.1 When recipient is the highest bidder In this type of addictive auction, the recipient is the highest bidder. This type of sys- tem motivates the participants to make the highest bidding and take advantage of re- ceiving some amount from the catalyst as well as obtain the auctioned resource (Fig. 2). Fig. 2. When highest bidder is assigned as the recipient. 3.2 When recipient is in between the highest bidder and the catalyst In this arrangement the highest bidder is not the recipient, which makes this arrange- ment a pure hybrid of a traditional auction system and lucky-draw based gambling system (Fig. 3). This type of arrangement motivates the candidates to participate in the auction. This motivation leads to an increase in the frequency of bidding, and in turn helps in increasing the final bidding amount. 5 Fig. 3. When the recipient is in between the highest bidder and the catalyst. Due to this hybrid nature of our proposed system, it can also be named as "collabora- tive auction" as the addictive nature of gambling helps the candidates to participate at a much higher level. 4 Working Demonstration We conducted an auctioning experiment to analyze the effects of both variants of our proposed auctioning system. In this experiment we studied the differences in the final bidding amount, engagement of participants, and in the total time taken to reach the final bidding among general auctioning and our addictive auctioning system. 6 S.no 1 2 3 4 5 Table 1. Experiment related details Symbol/Variable name Description Total Participants Parameter α Catalyst id (in 4.2) Catalyst id (in 4.3) Recipient id (in 4.3) 50 0.1 4 4 2 4.1 When a highest-bidder wins, type traditional auction system is used In this case, auctioning is performed using traditional rule of highest-bidder gets the auctioned resource. After repeated experimentation with different groups of partici- pants an average bidding trend in obtained (Fig. 4) Fig. 4. Visual analysis of bidding data. 4.2 Addictive auction, when recipient is the highest bidder In this case, bidding is performed using the recipient is the highest bidder variant of proposed addictive auction system. The average bidding trends obtained in this vari- ant shows much higher bidding amounts, suggesting that the system motivated candi- dates to bid higher and higher as the highest bidder will also be having benefit of be- ing the recipient (Fig. 5). 7 Fig. 5. Visual analysis of bidding data. 4.3 Addictive auction, recipient is between highest bidder and catalyst In this case, bidding is performed using the recipient in between highest bidder and catalyst variant of proposed addictive auction system. After analyzing the average bidding trends, It suggests that although the system motivated candidates to bid higher but after some point the rapid increase in the bidding price slows down a little, as some participants became interested in obtaining recipient Pid and taking free money at home (Fig. 6). Fig. 6. Visual analysis of bidding data. 8 4.4 Overall Comparative analysis A comparative analysis on the collected auction data is performed to figure out the performances of traditional highest-bidder wins and variants of addictive auction sys- tems Fig. 7. Visual analysis of bidding data. After analysis (Fig. 7), it became clear that both variants of proposed addictive auc- tions took less time to achieve the final bidding amount of traditional highest-bidder wins. This happened because of the addictive nature of gambling (i.e. catalyst and re- cipient) kept candidates more engaged and motivated to take part in the auction. Although, among both the variants of addictive auctions when highest-bidder was kept the recipient had reached higher final bidding amount than the other. This might have happened because in the longer run, some participants became more interested in becoming the recipient and not the highest-bidder. This situation could be further re- solved by kept on increasing the minimum increment to amount for doing bidding as the auction goes forward. 5 Conclusion Our proposed auction systems have shown potential of increasing the overall partici- pation in auctions leading to increase in the final bidding amount. The combined ef- fect of addictive nature of gambling system to an auction system help in increasing the participation of candidates. It also makes auctions more attention gathering and in turn reducing the illegal gambling activities which in turn leads to better law and or- der establishment. References 9 Lee YH, Qiu C. When uncertainty brings pleasure: The role of prospect imageability and mental imagery. Journal of Consumer Research. 2009 Apr 22;36(4):624-33. Wardle H, Keily R, Astbury G, Reith G. 'Risky places?': Mapping gambling machine density and socio-economic deprivation. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2014 Mar 1;30(1):201-12. Blaszczynski A, Collins P, Fong D, Ladouceur R, Nower L, Shaffer HJ, Tavares H, Venisse JL. Responsible gambling: General principles and minimal requirements. Jour- nal of gambling Studies. 2011 Dec 1;27(4):565-73. Ariyabuddhiphongs V. Lottery gambling: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2011 Mar 1;27(1):15-33. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Mu Y, Varadharajan V. An internet anonymous auction scheme. In International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology 2000 Dec 8 (pp. 171-182). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Olivola CY, Wang SW. Patience auctions: The impact of time vs. money bidding on elicited discount rates. Experimental Economics. 2016 Dec 1;19(4):864-85. Jung WJ, Yang S, Kim HW. Design of sweepstakes-based social media marketing for online customer engagement. Electronic Commerce Research. 2019 Jan 1:1-28. Zhang R, Shi RH, Qin JQ, Peng ZW. An economic and feasible Quantum Sealed-bid Auction protocol. Quantum Information Processing. 2018 Feb 1;17(2):35. Kersten GE, Wachowicz T, Kersten M. Competition, transparency, and reciprocity: a comparative study of auctions and negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2016 Jul 1;25(4):693-722. Naik AK, Baranwal G. Allocation of Resource Using Penny Auction in Cloud Com- puting. In Intelligent Communication and Computational Technologies 2018 (pp. 287- 294). Springer, Singapore Github repository, https://github.com/mr-ravin/collaborative-auction , last accessed 2019/4/30.
1807.10537	1	1807	2018-07-27T11:18:19	Investigating Wheat Price with a Multi-Agent Model	[ "econ.TH" ]	In this paper, we build a computational model for the analysis of international wheat spot price formation, its dynamics and the dynamics of internationally exchanged quantities. The model has been calibrated using FAOSTAT data to evaluate its in-sample predictive power. The model is able to generate wheat prices in twelve international markets and wheat used quantities in twenty-four world regions. The time span considered goes from 1992 to 2013. In our study, a particular attention was paid to the impact of Russian Federation's 2010 grain export ban on wheat price and internationally traded quantities. Among other results, we find that wheat average weighted world price in 2013 would have been 3.55\% lower than the observed one if the Russian Federation would not have imposed the export ban in 2010.	econ.TH	econ	INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL GIANFRANCO GIULIONI, EDMONDO DI GIUSEPPE, MASSIMILIANO PASQUI, PIERO TOSCANO, AND FRANCESCO MIGLIETTA Abstract. In this paper we build a computational model for the analysis of international wheat spot price formation, its dynamics and the dynamics of internationally exchanged quantities. The model has been calibrated using FAOSTAT data to evaluate its in-sample predictive power. The model is able to generate wheat prices in twelve international markets and wheat used quantities in twenty-four world regions. The time span considered goes from 1992 to 2013. In our study, a particular attention was paid to the impact of Russian Federation's 2010 grain export ban on wheat price and internationally traded quantities. Among other results, we find that wheat average weighted world price in 2013 would have been 3.55% lower than the observed one if the Russian Federation would have not imposed the export ban in 2010. Computational economics, main staples macroeconomic policies, food security, wheat price volatility, export ban, wheat international trade. 1. Introduction The worldwide supply of food in addition to the conditions of access to it by individuals are strictly connected to the concept of food security. The Food and Agriculture Organi- zation of United Nations (FAO) identifies the four pillars of food security as availability, access, utilization, and stability. In this framework, the volatility of commodity prices of the agricultural market observed in recent years is an issue, so much so that the European and international agricultural policy has shown a clear interest in reducing it effectively. Between 2008 and 2011 there has been changes in price as much as 100% in a year and the other. The maize (corn) was worth euro 129 per ton (129/t) in July 2006, then euro 283/t in March 2008 (+ 119%) and euro 139/t in September 2009 (-51%). In 2011 it rose to euro 290/t (+ 109%). The price of other cereals has had a similar trend and dramatic swings. These oscillations are due to several reasons, often complex and sometimes linked to real speculation based on emotion and ignorance of Securities Dealers. The first and perhaps most important structural element of the agricultural market volatility lies in the inherent fluctuation that is the basis of agricultural production. A good year and a bad year from a climate point of view can have decisive impacts on Department of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" Uni- versity, Pescara (Italy). National Research Council-Institute of Biometeorology (CNR-Ibimet), Roma, Italy. 1 2 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA production levels of a company and/or region, with the markets being quite sensitive to weather information that affects the yield potential of the growing crop. It is important for market operators to be able to predict the market price in order to maximize economics returns, but if high and volatile prices attract the most attention, low prices and volatility are problematic with extensive negative impacts on the agriculture sector, food security and the wider economy in both developed and developing countries (Toscano et al., 2012). For instance, a drought event in an area at risk seriously damage crops (Dono et al., 2013, 2016; Vignaroli et al., 2016). Furthermore, Khoury et al. (2014) have shown in their study that since 1961, human diets around the world have been changing and they have been becoming more similar. Those diets are composed for the most of few staple commodity crops, which "have increased substantially in the share of the total food energy (calories), protein, fat, and food weight that they provide to the world's human population, including wheat, rice, sugar, maize, soybean (by +284%), palm oil (by +173%), and sunflower (by +246%)". This fact, on one hand has relieved the under-nutrition condition of poorest people but on the other has increased the dependence of worldwide supply of food on other factors, such as speculation, meteorological conditions either directly since it makes agriculture more vulnerable to major threats like drought or indirectly, favoring the spread of insect pests and diseases, oil price volatility and the utilization of great portion of land to grow maize (corn) for biofuels production. The effects of relevant shocks such as the impressive sequence of fires in Russian Federa- tion that reduced dramatically the production of the grain-growing and determined a peak of cereals price (Welton, 2011) in the spring-summer 2011, provide a significant example of this dependence. Even climate change and its perception play a role (Nguyen et al., 2016). Asseng et al. (2014), for example, demonstrate that rising temperature (+2◦ or +4◦) reduces wheat production at global scale, although with different local rates. Thus, price volatility is an undesirable feature of a market because it poses difficulties for both buyers and producers. These difficulties are amplified for wheat that, among other uses, is employed as a basic element of foods, nourishing a large share of the world population. Similarly to rice, maize and soybean, wheat has become a staple in over 97% of countries (Khoury et al., 2014). Having a model able to understand how the staple commodity crops price is formed is thus of primary importance. To this aim we started building an Agent-based model (ABM) being convinced that this approach is the most suitable to account for the interaction among the several factors affecting the market price and to suggest stabilization policies. In this paper, we build on an agent-based model which provides the basic elements to analyze commodities international markets. The work presented in this paper aims at adapting this model to a particular commodity, i.e. wheat, in order to understand the worldwide wheat price formation and dynamics. The paper is organized as follows. We first present the functioning of the general version of the agent-based model. We then explain the changes we made to this model to account for the peculiarities of wheat market. The following part of the paper describes the empirical data we have used to provide input to the model and the elaboration we have done to reach a coherent configuration of the model. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 3 The paper proceeds with a comparison of simulation outputs with empirical data which allows an assessment of the modeling choices and provide insights on how to integrate and develop the model. Finally, the results of the simulation for the case study of Russian Federation ban on wheat exports in 2010 are presented. Conclusions are drawn in the final section. 2. The CMS model The starting point of the work reported in this paper is the Commodity Markets Simula- tor (CMS). It is a computational model primarily addressed to the analysis of commodities spot price formation, its dynamics and the dynamics of exchanged quantities (Giulioni, 2018). Commodities have the common feature of being traded in international markets however each of them has special features such as seasonality in production, in demand and in their storable feature (Pirrong, 2012). In this section we describe the functioning of the generic version of the model which details can be found either in (Giulioni, 2018) or in the software supporting material reporting the main features for the readers convenience (see the software Github repository at https://github.com/gfgprojects/cms). Details on how the model has been modified for analyzing wheat markets are given in paragraphs 3.2-3.2.4. 2.1. Overview. The Model has three types of agents: producers, buyers and markets. These agents' common feature is that each of them has a geographic location given by a latitude and a longitude. In the most straightforward interpretation, Producers can be thought of as sovereign countries, but it is possible to setup the model thinking at different geographical scales such as continents, macro areas, or regions of a country. For convenience of exposition we will identify hereafter producers with countries. Even though the model is fully customizable, we start describing a common setup for exposition convenience. The setup is as follows: uses the resource; • a producer has at least one associated buyer: if a country produces grains, it also • a buyer is not necessarily associated to a producer: to be more specific, the resource • the number of markets and their geographic location is independent from the num- can be used by countries that does not produce it; ber and location of producers and buyers. Because we think the first two listed features straightforward, we will now focus on the third one. 2.1.1. Market organization. Considering nowadays information and communication tech- nologies, we model markets as (virtual) places where producers and buyers send informa- tion. More trivially, resources are not physically moved to the market by the producer and, once sold, moved again from the market to the buyer. As it commonly happens, buyers and sellers send their will to the market. The market uses this information to reach an agreement. Once an agreement is reached, the resources are directly moved from the seller's to the buyer's place. 4 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA In this context, markets geographic location does not affect producers and sellers be- havior. It has a role only when the model has more than one market: opening order is set according to their latitude. Market are organized in sessions. Each market session is associated to a producer. The latter can have only one session in a market, and he must participate in at least one market. This organization allows buyers who bid in a given session to know who is the producer. The producer's geographic location has an important role here because it informs buyers on where the resource is stored. Because we assume buyers bear the transport costs, the proposed markets organization allows buyers to compute such costs and account for them when submitting their bids. 2.1.2. Market Participants. A producer can always decide to sell exclusively to its associ- ated buyer. In the real world this happen when a country forbid export. Similarly, buyers who have an associated producers can decide to buy exclusively from their producer (a producer country can forbid import). The latter, is not possible if the considered buyer has not an associated producer (a non producer country does not forbid import). Summing up, in each market session participates • the producers associated with the section; • buyers associated with the producer; • buyers not associated with the producer if the two following condition are both satisfied: -- the producer allows export; -- the buyer allows import 2.1.3. Dynamics. The "cornerstone" of the dynamics is the simulation time step. In each simulation time step, several actions can be performed however what mostly characterizes it, is that all the market sessions conclude the possible agreements. This provides a link between real and simulated time: if we want to simulate a real world situation where markets operate once a day (week, month and so on), a simulation step represents the same lapse. Starting from this observation we can comment the other simulation events. Consider for example the dynamics of the resource inventories. Straightforwardly, at each time step, each buyer's inventories are increased by the quantity bought in all the market sessions one participates, while each producer's inventories are decreased by the amount sold in the market sessions one is associated. Knowing the time scale is important to model the opposite flow. For buyers, the opposite flow to purchases is consumption. Therefore, if a simulation step represents a day, we have to take into account the daily consumption. Modeling the opposite flow is tricky for agriculture producers. The opposite flow to sales is the production flow. Agriculture products have not a continuous production, so we cannot compute a daily, weekly or monthly produced quantity as we can do for crude oil, for example. In general, agriculture production is harvested once a year. Our simulator accounts this issue giving the possibility to adapt the frequency of the production flow to the model time scale. Consider for example the situation with a monthly time step and an yearly production cycle. In this case, during the setup phase the researcher can (and must) INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 5 choose to increase producers' inventories by the obtained production every 12 simulated time steps. We report hereafter the sequence of events that can happen in a simulation time step. It integrates and organizes the elements given above: (1) producers decide if allow/forbid export (2) buyers with an associated producer decide if allow/forbid import (3) buyers update buying strategy (4) market sessions are operated • market 1 -- session 1 ∗ producer sends supply curve ∗ buyers send demand curves ∗ demand curves are aggregated ∗ market price and quantity are determined ∗ buyers increase inventories by the quantity bought in this session ∗ producer decrease inventories by the quantity sold in this session -- all the other sessions (if exist, perform same actions listed for session 1) • all other markets (if exist, perform same actions listed for market 1) (5) buyers account consumption (6) producers produce (7) producers update target production Following this list, below we detail the simulation loop. 2.2. The model main loop. 2.2.1. Producers decide if allow/forbid export. Each producer has a boolean variable named exportAllowed. This event consists in updating this variable with a true/false value. The stepExportAllowedFlag() method of the Producer class can edited to modify pro- ducers' export behavior. The frequency of this action (τexp) can be changed setting the exportPolicyDecisionInterval parameter. 2.2.2. Buyers with an associated producer decide if allow/forbid import. Each buyer has a boolean variable named importAllowed. This event consists in updating this variable with a true/false value. The stepImportAllowedFlag() method of the Buyer class can be edited to modify buyers' export behavior. The frequency of this action (τimp) can be changed setting the exportPolicyDecisionInterval parameter. 2.2.3. Buyers update buying strategy. Differently from the previous two actions, buying strategy is updated at each simulation time step. Updating the buying strategy is an elaborate action. It is especially because buyers have to fulfill their needs looking for cheapest opportunities in a changing environment. The most relevant change in buyers' environment is represented by the possible switch in producers export policy. In fact, buyers cannot continue buying in sessions associated to those producers who change their policy forbidding export. In these cases, buyers attempt to collect elsewhere the quantities 6 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA they were used to buy in these sessions. On the other hand, new opportunities open when producers switch their policy allowing export. Buyers' goals in updating their buying strategy are: (1) reducing the unit cost; (2) moving the demand usually directed to market sessions with recently imposed ex- port restrictions to sessions currently open to international trade; (3) designing demand curves for market sessions recently opened to international trade; (4) obtaining the desired quantity. To understand how these tasks are implemented we specify that at each time step, each buyer send to the available sessions a demand curve. In the current version of the model demand curves are assumed to be linear. The slope (db) can be different for each buyer, but it is the same for the same buyer in the various market sessions. The buyer updates the buying strategy by managing the intercepts of the demand curves one will send to the various market sessions ( ¯Db,ms,t). The initial level of the demand intercepts is a parameter ( ¯Db,0). Summarizing, the demand in market session ms formulated by buyer b at time t is: Db,ms,t = ¯Db,ms,t − dbpmc As an example, consider the situation represented in the following figure where a buyer participated (in the previous period) in three market sessions (labeled A, B and C). A, q∗ B, q∗ C and the total quantity q∗ The B > p∗ A + q∗ charts show that the market prices were p∗ quantities q∗ A = p∗ C and that the buyer bought the B + q∗ C. Consider however, that the transport cost (c) must be added to the market price (p∗) to obtain the unit cost of the commodity. Buyers use this cost, denoted p+, to rank market sessions. Suppose now that the buyer we are considering and the producer selling in market session C are from different countries and the latter forbids exports. So, the buyer have to gather the quantity q∗ C in other available market sessions. The assumption is that the buyer performs this attempt in the market session with the lowest p+. Looking at the chart above, we see that p+ A. So, the demand curve in market session B is shifted to the left by q∗ C as happens in the following graphic representation. B < p+ p∗Aq∗Ap+Ap∗Bq∗Bp+Bp∗Cq∗Cp+CpApBpCqAqBqCINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 7 This behavior is operated to achieve goals 1 and 2 as listed above. However, there will be no movements in the demand curves if the buyer can continue participating in all markets sessions. The attempt to reduce the unit cost (goal 1 in the list) is lost in this case. To allow for the achievement of this goal even when there are no export/import policy changes, we introduce the following device. The buyer can move demand from the most expensive market session (A in our example) to the cheapest one (B). We introduce a tolerance to perform this action by using the parameter ι. In particular, the movement is made if: (1 + ι)p+ min < p+ max the ι parameter corresponds to the toleranceInMovingDemand parameter in the code. We furthermore introduce an additional parameter to control the size of this movement. . The quantity to ) can be tuned by Suppose the quantity bought in the market with the highest cost is qp+ be moved from the most expensive to the cheapest market (qp+ max→p+ setting the m parameter in the equation: max max (1) qp+ max→p+ max = mqp+ max the m parameter corresponds to the shareOfDemandToBeMoved parameter in the code. The two charts below shows the leftward shift of the demand curve in market session A and the rightward shift of the curve in market session B after moving the quantity. p∗Aq∗Ap+Ap∗Bq∗Bp+B(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)q∗Cp∗Cq∗CpApBpCqAqBqCp∗Aq∗Ap+Ap∗Bq∗Bp+B(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)q∗ApApBqAqB8 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Next, consider the case in which the buyer can participate in a new market session named D. The problem now is how to formulate the demand curve for this new session (goal 3). The idea is that the buyer is willing to buy in this new market only if the unit cost will be lower than the lowest unit cost observed in the previous period. In the previous figure, the lowest unit cost is p+ B while the transport cost for the new available producer is cD. Thus the price in session D should be lower than p+ B − cD. We add the parameter d to tune the price mark down that convince a buyer to enter a new available market session. This allows to set the demand curve in the new market session as in the rightmost chart of the following figure. The last movement of the demand curves before sending them to the market sessions is done when the quantity gathered in the market is low and people or authorities think this negatively impacts on the economy or on the population welfare. b The reasoning starts from the definition of Buyers' minimum consumption (Cmin ). It is set at the beginning of the simulation as follows Cmin b = c sb,0P0 τ where 0 < c < 1, s is the buyer market share, P0 is the global production at initialization, and τ is the production cycle length. The division by τ deserves a comment. While the buying strategy is updated at each simulation time step, the global production relates to the production cycle length, this motivates the division by τ . The following example should clarify it. Consider a situation where a simulation time step represents a month and the production is realized yearly. P0 is the yearly global production and sb,0P0 is the amount bought yearly by the buyer. Since this event manages the monthly demand, we have to divide by 12 (which is the τ in this example). Now, having computed the average monthly consumption, we use it to set the lower bond of consumption by multiplying for the c parameter. example is q∗ effective consumption (Cb,t). Consider now the buyer buys an amount Bb,t in the considered time step (that in our C). This quantity is then consumed and represents the buyer's B + q∗ A + q∗ When the consumed quantity gets lower than the minimum consumption threshold ), people and authorities manage to obtain more commodity in the incoming (Cb,t < Cmin period shifting the demand curve in the rightward direction. b p∗Ap+Ap∗Bp+Bp+B−cD−dpApBpDqAqBqDINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 9 All the demand curves are shifted by max(Cmin b −Cb,t,0) #msb,t+1 , where #msb,t+1 denotes the num- ber of market session the buyer will participate. The following charts display the case in which the demanded quantities are increased because consumption was lower than the minimum. In fact, all the demand curve have a rightward shift. b . Demand curves do not move if Cb,t ≥ Cmin Because there are buyers without an associated producer, it may happen that there are no available session because all producers forbid exports. In these cases, if none of the producers switch the export policy, no demand curve is set, otherwise demand curves for newly available sessions are set. The idea is similar to that presented above however the buyer has not the benchmark of the cheapest unit cost at which s/he bought in the latest time step. Anyhow, the latest prices observed in the newly available market sessions are known. The current version of the model first sets the demand curve in each market in such a way that the demanded quantity is zero at the latest observed market price as displayed in the following charts. Then, the demand functions are moved as explained above according to the quantity. max(Cmin b −Cb,t,0) #msb,t+1 Changes to the basic behaviors presented in this paragraph can be done modifying the method stepBuyingStrategy of the Buyer class. As a last note on demand curves, we highlight a slight difference between demand di- rected to the domestic producer and these addressed to abroad producers. We introduce a parameter for tuning the minimum importable quantity (Imin). If it is set to a positive pApBpDqAqBqDp∗Dp∗EpDpEqDqE10 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA value, quantities lower than this threshold are set to zero in the abroad demand curves. This correction does not applies for the domestic demand curve. 2.2.4. Perform market sessions. We will now describe the functioning of a market session. First of all, we recall that in a market session, the exchanged items come from a given producer. This is basically because using the geographic location of producer, buyers can compute transport costs that are used to update the buying strategy as explained above. We have already discussed how buyers set their demand curves, now we need to specify how the producer sets the supply curve. In the present version of the model, the easi- est option of a vertical supply curve is adopted: the supplied quantity is independent of price. Despite this simplification, managing the supply policy is tricky when accounting for production that are not realized at every simulation time step and/or for producers who participates in more than one market session in each time step. Even in these cases, the simplest solution is adopted. At the beginning of each market session, the producer checks the level of the resource stock and divides it equally among the market sessions to come before the production is realized. Because in a market session there is one seller (producer), its supply curve represents the whole session supply curve. Differently, we can have more than one buyer attending a session (this is usually the case except when the seller forbids exports). When we have two or more buyers, the demand curves they send to the market are aggregated by summing them horizontally to obtain the session demand curve. Now, using the session demand and supply curves, the market price and exchanged quantity are computed. The quantity bought by each buyer is obtained using the market price and the individual demand. The following chart, which focuses on market session A, can better clarify it. Figure 1. computation of market price and exchanged quantities Bold lines are the market session supply (SA) and demand (DA) curves. For exposition convenience it is assumed that there are three buyers in this market. The thin black lines pADAp∗AqASA(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)q∗1Aq∗2Aq∗3AINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 11 keep track of the horizontal sum of the individual demand curves. The intersection point between the session demand and supply curves (bold lines) determine the market price (p∗ A) and the total exchanged quantity (q∗ 1A, q∗ 2A, q∗ 3A) are also reported. Obviously q∗ A = q∗ At the end of the session agents update their inventories level. For buyers we have: A). The quantity bought by each buyer (q∗ 1A + q∗ 2A + q∗ 3A. Ib = Ib + qbA while for the producer Ip = Ip − q∗ A This updating is performed at the end of each market session, so, in a time step, the level of inventories is updated by each agent as many time as the number of session it participates. 2.2.5. Buyers account consumption. This action is performed to account for the consump- tion of resources occurred during the time step. Buyers' inventories are newly updated: Being consumption a continuous phenomenon, this update is performed at every time step. Ib = Ib − Cb 2.2.6. Producers Produce. This action is performed to account for the production of re- sources. Producers' inventories are newly updated: Ip = Ip + Yp where Yp is the production realized in a period. Differently from buyers, this update is not necessarily performed at each time step. As mentioned above, there are commodities whose production is not continuous. For those commodities, if the time step represents a shorter time interval than the production one, this update is performed at regular interval. 2.2.7. Producers Set Target Level of Production. To evolve the target level of production (Y T ) the following parameters are used: • the producers prices memory length ppml; • the high price threshold ph; • the low price threshold pl; • the percentage change of target production δY T . The software first computes the average price observed by producer p in the latest ppml market sessions, say ¯p, then the following rule is used to update Y T p :  Y T Y T p = p (1 + δY T ) Y T p (1 − δY T ) Y T p if if ¯p > ph ¯p < pl otherwise The initial level of the production target Yb,0 is computed as spP0. Then, it is updated at regular intervals applying the rule given above. Note that this supply management effect can be disabled by setting δY T = 0. 12 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA 3. The CMS-Wheat model The model presented above needs some specializations to analyze wheat. We adopt a modeling strategy that provides for a gradual introduction of real world elements.The comparison of simulation outputs with the corresponding real world data is a guide to progressively improve the modeling choices and to remove the shortcuts made to keep the initial versions of the model essential and easily understandable. Figure 2 gives a visual representation of the model used in this paper. Following the figure flow, we describe hereafter its components: the real data used as inputs and as term of comparison for outputs, the modeling choices, and the comparison of the model output with empirical ones. Figure 2. visual representation of the model 3.1. The data. We use data at yearly time scale for (1) wheat production and uses, (2) wheat prices (3) crude oil price. Items 1-2 of the list are from FAOSTAT dataset and item 3 is from World Bank databases. Details on these data are given hereafter. yearly pricessimulationoutputsmodel for demandmodel for marketdomestic food use andreal datamodel for supplyimport-export relationshipsimport-export relationshipsyearly pricesmonthly pricesproduction time seriesreal data toobtain inputscomparisoncomparisondomestic wheat uses anddemand target at average priceprocessingINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 13 (1) National and regional time series of yearly wheat production and uses were down- loaded from Food Balance section of FAO website (Commodity Balances - Crops Primary Equivalent). This dataset contains time series of "Wheat and products", that includes Wheat; Flour wheat; Bran wheat; Macaroni; Germ wheat; Bread; Bulgur; Pastry; Starch wheat; Gluten wheat; Cereals breakfast; Wafers; Mixes and doughs; Food preparations, flour, malt extract. For production, the definition of "wheat" given in FAOSTAT is as follows: "Triticum spp.: common (T. aestivum) durum (T. durum) spelt (T. spelta). Common and durum wheat are the main types. Among common wheat, the main varieties are spring and winter, hard and soft, and red and white. At the national level, different varieties should be reported separately, reflecting their different uses. Used mainly for human food ". Given this definition, we jointly model soft and hard wheat since we are not able to distinguish between one and another. The FAO wheat dataset contains a rich set of variables: Import, Export, Domestic supply quantity (Production + Imports - Exports + Changes in stocks), Food supply quantity, Stock Variation, Feed, Other uses, Seed, Waste (tonnes). These variables are the component of the wheat sources/uses balance equation on which the present paper relies on. To understand the validation procedure implemented in this paper, some detail on the balance equation are given. Formally, the balance equation is the following: production + import − export + stock variation = (2) = F ood + F eed + Seed + Other uses + processing + waste as the one in "Crops section" of FAO Production dataset (Crops). Some specification on the involved variables might be useful. • The Production variable contained in this dataset is approximately the same • According to FAOSTAT definitions, a negative sign in stock variation corre- sponds to an increase in stock. Stock variation is thus defined as initial stock - final stock. • Statistical discrepancy makes the aggregation of balances equation across world regions and countries not exact (see appendix, paragraph A for the details). (2) Yearly time series of wheat prices for most of the producing countries are used to validate the model output. An aggregated time series of yearly wheat price has been calculated averaging prices of selected producers by means of weighted arithmetic mean, where production volume is used as weight. Because they will be compared with our simulation results, the most important prices time series are reported in Figure 3. (3) Crude oil price is from World Bank Global Economic Monitor (GEM) Commodities database. The item has the following description: Crude Oil (petroleum), simple average of three spot prices; Dated Brent, West Texas Intermediate, and the Dubai Fateh, US Dollars per Barrel. Data are available in the World Bank website. The dynamics of crude oil price is displayed in figure 3 together with those of prices. 14 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Figure 3. Relevant prices Below we will proceed to aggregations and decompositions of quantity data. It is there- fore useful to give information on this topic. Table 1 reports data on the top 20 worldwide wheat producers. Countries were ranked according to averaged production over the period 1992-2013. The table reports the country percentage of worldwide production; the corre- Country China, mainland India United States of America Russian Federation France Canada Germany Australia Pakistan Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Argentina Kazakhstan Iran (Islamic Republic of) Poland Italy Egypt Spain Romania Production (tons.) World quote (%) Yield (hg/ha) Harvested Area (ha) 107553131 73447196 59837235 44150970 35644793 25662926 21493799 20491377 20197472 19623609 17384717 14614000 12798788 11906664 11256451 8865031 7542812 6978899 5662888 5687618 25824041 26927187 21545498 23017824 5167419 10271374 2929144 11782063 8431478 8849862 5903731 1903574 5204802 11943083 6384640 2373448 2185268 1130640 2101009 2070757 17.4 11.9 9.7 7.2 5.8 4.2 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 42086 27135 27908 18994 68948 25171 73073 17318 23860 22346 28902 76715 24752 9883 17610 37513 34754 61260 27102 27080 Table 1. Top 20 worldwide wheat producers (averaged values 1992-2013) spondent averaged yield, i.e. hectogram of production per hectare; the averaged portion of ♣♣♣♣♠♠♠♠♠♠•••••••wheatUSA,monthly,metricton♣wheataverage,annual,metricton♠crudeoilaverage,monthly,barrel01002003004001995200020052010timepriceUS$INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 15 land utilized to grow wheat (Harvested Area). The wheat production of Top 20 and Top 5 amount to 86.1% and 52% of worldwide production, respectively. 3.2. Simulation settings. In this section we retrace the description of the general version of the model to discuss the customizations and the modeling choices made in order to specialize the model for wheat. 3.2.1. Agents. We set up the simulation to obtain a level of aggregation suitable to investi- gate international prices formation and exchanged quantities. In general, we use FAOSTAT regions which are sub-continental geographic areas gathering several countries. However, when a region includes a country (countries) playing a relevant role in the wheat world production/consumption system, we further partition the region to treat the important country (countries) as individual entities (see Appendix, paragraph A for more details). At the end of this process we end up with the geographic areas reported in Table 2. Continent Region Has an international market? incoming hub Africa America Asia Europe Oceania Eastern Middle Northern Southern Western Northern - USA Northern except USA South Central Caribbean Southern - India Southern - Pakistan Southern except India & Pakistan Central - Russian Federation Central except Russian Federation Eastern - China Eastern except China South-Eastern Western Eastern Northern Western Southern no no no no no yes - USA yes - Canada yes - Argentina no no yes - India yes - Pakistan no yes - Russian Federation yes - Kazakhstan yes - China no no no yes - Ukraine yes - United Kingdom yes - France no yes - Australia Table 2. Geographic regions and markets Ethiopia Angola Egypt South Africa Nigeria USA Canada Brazil Mexico Cuba India Pakistan Iran Russian Federation Uzbekistan China Japan Indonesia Iraq Poland United Kingdom Netherland Italy New Zeland Almost all the regions realize a wheat production but only a few of them are relevant at international level. To retain only internationally relevant producers in our analysis and keeping world demand-supply balance, we proceed as follows. The net demand was computed for each region as the difference between wheat demand and supply. Regions having a positive net demand in all the years of the time span considered were assumed to consume their production internally. Their production was therefore set to zero and their demand was replaced by their net demand. As a result of this process, the artificial wheat world trade system considered in this study is populated by 121 sellers (these having 1Note that the 12 outgoing hubs are in the top 14 worldwide wheat producers listed in table 1. The two missed top 14 producers are Germany and Turkey. Germany was excluded because it is second to France 16 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA a "yes" in the "Has an international market?" column in Table 2) and 24 buyers. For each of these geographic areas, the most important commercial hubs were identified. Again, in Table 2 the column "Has an international market?" highlights the market location (see also Table 1 for a complete ranking of these producers) and the "Incoming hubs" column reports the top importer of each zone. The position of outgoing and incoming hubs are shown in Figures 4, which also gives information on quantities offered and used by each region. Figure 4. Commercial hubs considered in the model. Green circles denotes outgoing hubs, light blue circles denotes incoming hubs. The size of the circles is associated to produced and used quantities. The tick line delineates the regions boundaries. Buyers and sellers interact in a single global market having 12 sessions (one for each producer). 3.2.2. Dynamics. The time window for the simulation is set to the period 1992-2013 and the model run on a monthly base. This means that in a simulation time step all the market sessions are performed while each producer harvest every 12-time steps (see paragraph 2.1.3 for details). Harvesting time is asynchronous and mirrors reality. According to the dynamics of events reported in paragraph 2.1.3 the model gives the possibility to change import/export policies (items 1 and 2). As we will highlight below in the text we will use this features to investigate the effect of the 2010 Russian Federation export ban on international wheat price. Except for this, the model implements a com- pletely open global market environment. In these settings, transport costs are the decisive factor that relates the demand function a buyer sends to a market session with the distance from the producer selling in the considered session. Transport costs per unit of product (c) in the Western Europe regions. Turkey was not considered because it belongs to the Western Asia region which is a net importer and therefore has not an outgoing hub. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 17 bear by buyer A to carry home resource bought from producer B are modeled as follows: cA,B = a kkmA,B + b Op kkmA,B (3) where Op is the oil price, and kkmA,B is the distance in thousand kilometers. a is a fix cost per thousand kilometer and b is the oil needed to carry one unit of product for thousand kilometer. 3.2.3. Demand. As explained in paragraph 2.2.3, the final product unit cost is p+ A,B = p∗ B + cA,B. Buyers compute this value for each market and move a share of demand from the highest to the lowest p+. This brings us to discuss the changes made to the demand curve shape. We use linear demand curves as mentioned above. In initializing the demand curves position we account for the size of the buyer and that of the producer in order to avoid big countries address too large demands to small producers and vice versa. In this way we set the target level of demand ( d) which is the quantity demanded at the average price level (see figure 5).2 We then set the slope of the demand function in such a way that the demanded quantity increases by a given percentage (the parameter δD) when the price equals zero. Therefore, the demand curve is a straight line going from d− := d(1 − δD) to d+ := d(1 + δD) as displayed in Figure 5. Furthermore, there is a level of price ¯pz above which the wheat is out of range because too expensive for the country. It is straightforward to think this threshold is heterogeneous across countries, with poor countries having a low level of this price. However, we take it homogeneous in order to keep the model simple. Demand curves continuously move in time to allow buyers geographic regions to gather the desired quantities at the lowest price. Desired quantities ( d) are inputs for our agent-based model. Comprehensibly, they are not included in any database. We therefore decided to infer them from the FAOSTAT data using a calibration procedure which is better described below and in the appendix. 3.2.4. Supply. In order to keep the wheat variant of the model simple and in line with the general version presented above, we use a vertical supply curve. In addition to the basic model, a reservation price below which the producer is not willing to sell was introduced. The reservation price (rp) is given by: (4) rp = arp + brp Op This functional form is based on a linear unit production cost composed of a fix part and a second component proportional to oil price. A second amendment to the supply curve of the original model involves the rule used to update the monthly offered quantity. We let producers distribute the harvested quantity uniformly on the twelve market sessions. Figure 6 shows the supply curve of a producer region (say region A) which is offering wheat at the international level. As for demand curves, the supply curves change in each time step. In particular, the horizontal portion moves up or down at each time step (i.e. 2For computational convenience, demand curves are defined in a given price range, namely 0-10, therefore the average level of price is 5. Given this simplification, we will rescale both simulated and real prices in order to make comparison as will be clarified in the results section. 18 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Figure 5. region z de- mand curve for wheat pro- duced by region A. Figure 6. region A sup- ply curve monthly) according to the oil price level, while the monthly offered quantity (yA), i.e. the vertical portion, moves left or right after the harvesting month (i.e. at every 12-time steps) and keeps still for the rest of the year. 3.2.5. Market equilibrium and disequilibrium. The modification to the demand and sup- ply curves just described brings the possibility to observe market disequilibrium even in the centralized market structure used in this model. A market is in equilibrium when the intersection point belongs to the downward section of the demand curve and to the vertical section of the supply curve. This situation is basically the one already seen in figure 1. One possibility of disequilibrium is characterized by intersection points belonging to the horizontal section of the supply curve. This happens when the demand is too low compared with the offered quantities. Because this is a situation observed in our simula- tions, we report it in figure 7. In this case, as displayed in the figure, producers countries does not succeed in selling the whole quantity offered in the market. In another form of market disequilibrium buyers leave the market without the quantity they wish. If hetero- geneous ¯pz are considered, the market demand curves have horizontal sections (especially at high prices). Buyers rationing happens if the intersection point falls in one of these portions. Furthermore, it can happen that the market price is higher than some countries reservation prices. Therefore, these countries do not buy wheat at all. However, our sim- plification of homogeneous buyers reservation price excludes the realization of this case in our simulations. Other forms of market disequilibrium, such as those due to decentralized market structure, cannot either be observed in our simulation. These two cases represent opportunities for future developments of the model. 3.3. Calibration procedure. The model has several parameters. Setting some of them is straightforward or can be done using economic observation. A calibration procedure pAqAdz,td+z,td−z,tpArpqAyA,tINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 19 Figure 7. market in disequilibrium due to a demand fall or production boom. has been implemented to set those of them for which no other way is feasible. Table 3 reports the parameters. It also signals with * the parameters that was calibrated using the differential evolution algorithm. parameter notation value reference production cycle tolerance in moving demand fix cost in reservation price slope in reservation price transportCostsTuner slope transportCostsTuner intercept* shareOfDemandToBeMoved* percentageOfPriceMarkDownInNewlyAccessibleMarkets* demandFunctionInterceptTuner* demandFunctionSlopeTuner* Table 3. Parameters setting (symbol * signals the using of differential evolution algorithm for the calibration). in paragraph 2.2.3 in paragraph 2.2.3 in equation 4 in equation 4 in equation 3 in equation 3 in equation 1 in paragraph 2.2.3 in paragraph 2.2.3 in paragraph 3.2.3 τ ι arp brp b a m d ¯Db,0 δD 12 0 1 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.5 15 In addition, as hinted above and better explained in the appendix, we commit to infer the desired demand of each region starting from the observed level of exchange found in the FAOSTAT dataset using the following equation Dz,t = (1 − ηd we therefore need to calibrate the ηd t . t )Dz,t Parameter calibration is driven by the objective of yearly price replication. Two different t s and for a, m, d, ¯Db,0 and δD. These two techniques are nested techniques are used for ηd in a recursive procedure. The ηd t s are initially set to 1 and the last five parameters reported in Table 3 are set by running the differential evolution algorithm. Once these parameters have been set, a new configuration of ηd t s is searched by running an algorithm inspired by pADAp∗AqASA(cid:124)(cid:123)(cid:122)(cid:125)unsold20 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA the gradient method. The procedure is as follows. After a model run, yearly prices pt are computed. If the price from simulation output is higher than the real price in a given year, the ηd for that year is increased. ηd are simultaneously changed according to the following equation: (cid:19) (cid:18) ηd = ηd + 1 1 + e−β(pt−pt) 0.02 − 0.01 Once this process has completed, a new round is started running again the differential evolution. We use this nested process to speed up the parameter estimation. Indeed, a joint cali- bration of all the parameters using the differential evolution algorithm is possible, but it would be extremely demanding from the computational point of view. Using the gradient inspired method for the ηd significantly speed up the process. 3.4. Comparing simulated and empirical data. The model outputs the 12 producers' monthly prices and the exchanged quantities. The latter is especially interesting in order to identify each buyer wheat availability and the origin of these quantities. Result on prices and quantities are shown in next subsections. 3.4.1. Prices. The comparison between simulation output and real world data is straight- forward for yearly prices because they are fully available for each country. Figure 8 com- pares simulation outputs with the weighted average price of the 12 producer countries. The weight is given by the share sold by the country with respect to the sum of the total quan- tity sold. As already mentioned, both prices and sold quantities are available in real world data at yearly frequency. Simulations provides instead monthly values. Therefore, yearly aggregation is computed from simulation data by first calculating the monthly weighted prices and then averaging them every 12 periods. Since simulation unit measure for prices is different from real data one, we normalize the values. Figure 8 shows the yearly weighted world price fit. The prices observed in real data are accurately reproduced by our model. Although this is a consequence of the calibration procedure described above which has the objective of minimizing the distance between simulated and real prices, this result signals that the model grasps the essential elements of the wheat international exchanges. 3.4.2. Quantities. By using simulation output, we can compute the quantity bought in the domestic market session, the quantities bought by each of the other producers, and those sold to each buyer. It is thus possible to compute the import and export time series on a monthly base and obtain the corresponding annual series by summing over every 12 periods. The model simulation output tracks for each area the quantity bought from all open markets. We have therefore to connect these quantities with the variables in the FAOSTAT database. We already described in equation 2 the relationship among the variables included in the database. We will use the following notation: f otot food; f etot feed; INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 21 Figure 8. Yearly wheat price time series from real data and from a simu- lation with calibrated parameters. setot seed; opwtot other uses+processing+waste. The right hand side of the balance equation gives us a proxy of the wheat used (thus bought) by a country in each year regardless of its origin (domestic of foreign). In this version of the model, simulations do not provide specific results of those categories, i.e. food, feed, seed, and other uses but they supply the domestic or foreign source of bought quantity: qdom and qimp, respectively. To compare observed and simulated bought quantity, we observe that each term in the right hand side mixes domestic and foreign wheat, so that we can write: f otot+f etot+setot+opwtot = f odom + f oimp + f edom + f eimp + sedom + seimp + opwdom + opwimp = (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) f etot (cid:125) (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) setot (cid:125) (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) opwtot (cid:125) = f odom + f edom + sedom + opwdom + f oimp + f eimp + seimp + opwimp = qdom + qimp (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) f otot (cid:125) (cid:125) (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) qdom (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) qimp (cid:125) These observations allow us to compare the quantity f otot + f etot + setot + opwtot obtained from FAOSTAT database with the quantity qdom + qimp obtained from our simulations. Recall that starting from the right hand side of the balance equation, we compute the target level of demand D which is given to the model as an input. The comparison of these three variables (real, simulation output and simulation input) provides an opportunity to evaluate the performance of the model by the quantity side. ♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠•••••••••••1.01.52.02.51995200020052010timenormalizedannualprice♠simulation•realWeightedworldprice22 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Figure 9 shows the dynamics of these three variables for the United States of America to provide an example. The charts for all the other regions can be viewed at http: //erre.unich.it/wheat_map/bought_png.html. Figure 9. Comparison of USA used quantities in real data (FAO), in sim- ulations and target, i.e. the USA desired demand at average price (yearly time series). Although the replication of quantities has no weight in the calibration process, the dy- namics of simulated quantities is compatible with those observed. However, we expect possible improvements in the future by giving weight to quantities in the calibration ob- jective function. On the quantity side, the model generates detailed data that allows for stimulating exercises, even though the scarcity of empirical data makes it difficult to validate the results. An example is the possibility to build the network of international exchanges and the possibility to trace the dynamics of such a network. This is a recent topic of investigation (Barigozzi et al., 2010; Fair et al., 2017). We perform this exercise and report the result in Figure 10. The figure provides a visual representation of the international exchanges generated by the model for 2010. We recall that, in this type of representation, flows move clockwise. In other words a node A provides resources to a node B if moving from A along the edge to B implies a clockwise movement. Some examples can help clarifying. According to Figure 10, South-Eastern Asia imported a relevant amount of wheat from Oceania (note the counter clockwise outer direction of the edges starting from ♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠•••••••••••2.7e+073.0e+073.3e+073.6e+073.9e+071995200020052010timeBoughtquantities(tons)♠FAO♣simulation•targetUnitedStatesofAmericaINVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 23 Indonesia), while United States and Canada exported to several other regions (clockwise outer direction of many edges exiting from these countries). A comparison of Figure 10 and 11 shows how the scenario can change year after year. However, the evolution of international relationships generated by our model can be better appreciated visiting the web page http://erre.unich.it/wheat_map/. 3.5. Assessing the effects of the 2010 Russian Federation export blocking. One of the most challenging use of the model presented in this paper is the evaluation of policy choice effects both on wheat prices and exchanged quantities. The Russian Federation export ban mentioned in the introduction (paragraph 1) provides an occasion in this di- rection. In 2010 a severe climate anomaly interested Eastern Europe causing many impacts re- lated to heat-waves (Barriopedro et al., 2011), wildfires (Lioubimtseva et al., 2013) and air pollution episodes (Konovalov et al., 2011). In particular, Russian Federation, Kaza- khstan, and Ukraine (all three amongst the world's top-10 wheat exporters) suffered the worst heatwave and drought in more than a century, while the Republic of Moldova was struck by floods and hail storms (Arpe et al., 2011; Winne and Peersman, 2016). Further- more, from early July to September a large crop production area was hit by wildfire with a significant production cut and only in Russian Federation grain yield was reduced by a third (Lioubimtseva et al., 2013). As a consequence, in mid-August 2010 Russian Federa- tion banned the export of domestically produced wheat (Lioubimtseva et al., 2013). The measure was introduced to ensure wheat availability to domestic users after the dramatic crops loss. At the same time must be take into account that wheat prices have soared by about 90 percent since June 2010 because of these events as well as floods in Canada, while ban pushed price even higher. As explained above, in our model import/export policies can be managed. This gives us a chance to observe how the system would have evolved if the export ban would have not be imposed. It is worth mentioning that because in the real world the ban indeed happened, it was active in our model during the calibration process. Using the calibrated parameters, the model was run two additional times: with the Russian Federation export ban enabled and disabled. Figure 12 shows the result of this exercise on prices. According to the model output, wheat average world price would have been significantly lower in 2011-2013 if Russian Federation would not have imposed the ban (red line). Precisely, in 2013 the normalized observed and simulated (with ban) prices are basically the same and equal to 2.395. The normalized price in the simulation without ban is 2.31, with a -3.55% deviation from the observed price. The figure also shows the projection of prices for the following years (dashed lines). They are obtained under the simplification that produced and demanded quantity keep constant to the 2013 levels. According to the model output the price gap tends to be constant in time. Although it is not easy to assess the robustness of this result due to the peculiar assumption under which it is obtained, the change in the level of prices observed in the dashed portion provides an opportunity for an additional observation. Since quantities are set exactly the same as in 2013, then the prices should not move from the 2013 level 24 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA unless the system is not in its steady state. It follows that normally the system is not in its steady state and out of equilibrium situations often prevail. The effect of the ban on quantities can be evaluated by looking again at Figures 10 and 11. According to the model, the export ban has modified Russian Federation commercial relationships. Figure 11, for example, makes it evident the relevant increase of the Russian Federation-China commercial relationship after the export ban was removed. Looking at the supporting material at http://erre.unich.it/wheat_map it is possible to see how this link gradually normalizes in the following years. 4. Conclusions and Further developments In a globalized economy, the price of commodities, especially those of agricultural prod- ucts depends on several factors: production technologies, commercial relationships, climate change forcing in various places of the globe only to cite the most important. Traditional analytic techniques find it difficult to take into account such variety of events. This work is a first step to take advantage of the agent-based techniques to handle all these factors. In particular, we aim at building a tool for analyzing the dynamics of cereals prices and exchanged quantities under alternative economic, environmental and climate conditions. In this paper, we have specialized the structure and the dynamics of an existing Agent based model for the generic analysis of commodities (the CMS model) to the wheat case. Changes are formulated in accordance with the economic determinants of Agricultural productions. Our variant of the original software is called the CMS-Wheat simulator. The careful model calibration we implement, together with the inclusion of crude oil price allow replication of empirical yearly weighted world price. By the quantity side, we have obtained promising results though further model building is needed. The model can be developed and improved in several directions. Figure 13 reports the top part of figure 2 with some integration to highlight possible developments of the model. These developments involve either the demand side (differen- tiating by the utilization of cereals) and the supply side (conversion to biofuels, seasonal to decadal climate effects, technical levels, policy incentives, etc.). In particular, we think considering climate factors of primary importance in the further development of this work. We plan to develop the model to include climate variability forcing that is acting on wheat yields as a primary exogenous factor. The combination of global scale climatic forcing, e.g. the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and local scale climatic characteristic, such as a period of drought, could modulate price dynamics or even produce shocks in the global market with relevant impacts. Iizumi et al. (2014) and Gutierrez (2017) find that the large scale atmospheric dynamics affect the local crop yields. Following this insight, we are presently running linear regression in order to identify the effect of the ENSO on wheat yield of the top 20 worldwide producers. Preliminary results are encouraging: on average, we find 6-7 significant effects for each considered country (for a total of 138 significant relationships). All this will improve the modeling of wheat supply. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 25 Another important factor will be taken into account is the stock management of cereals that directly affects cereals international price. Traditionally stock-holding has been a pri- vate as well as a public activity. Private operations in this field are linked to the possibility of speculation based on future price expectations. On the other hand, Government agencies usually adopt a price band to balance supply and demand and to contain price volatility. The management of the stock is strictly connected to the availability, access, utilization, and stability of food. It could represent the policy tool to reduce malnutrition in poorest countries. All these developments will improve the performance of the model. It could therefore be used as a tool for producing reliable forecasts of prices and quantities both at global and region/country level. Another important goal of the model is to give recommendations about prevention policies that most reduce the negative effects of extreme negative events, emergency measures that implies less sacrifice for the population and measures to reduce the price volatility. 5. Acknowledgements This study was partially developed in the framework of VOPA Project (VOlatilit`a dei mercati e Produzioni Agricole: interazioni fra variabilit`a climatica e sviluppo tecnologico delle nazioni nei meccanismi di formazione dei prezzi dei prodotti alimentari) and MACSUR (Modeling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security - www.macsur.eu) - phase 2 Project. References Arpe, K., S. A. G. Leroy, H. Lahijani, and V. Khan (2011, aug). Impact of the european russia drought in 2010 on the caspian sea level. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 8 (4), 7781 -- 7803. Asseng, S., F. Ewert, P. Martre, R. P. Rotter, D. B. Lobell, D. Cammarano, B. A. Kimball, M. J. Ottman, et al. (2014). Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5 (2), 143 -- 147. Barigozzi, M., G. Fagiolo, and D. Garlaschelli (2010). Multinetwork of international trade: A commodity-specific analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1879v4. Barriopedro, D., E. M. Fischer, J. Luterbacher, R. M. Trigo, and R. Garc´ıa-Herrera (2011). The hot summer of 2010: Redrawing the temperature record map of europe. Science 332 (6026), 220 -- 224. Dono, G., R. Cortignani, D. Dell'Unto, P. Deligios, L. Doro, N. Lacetera, L. Mula, M. Pasqui, S. Quaresima, A. Vitali, and P. P. Roggero (2016). Winners and losers from climate change in agriculture: Insights from a case study in the mediterranean basin. Agricultural Systems 147, 65 -- 75. Dono, G., R. Cortignani, L. Doro, L. Giraldo, L. Ledda, M. Pasqui, and P. P. Roggero (2013). An integrated assessment of the impacts of changing climate variability on agri- cultural productivity and profitability in an irrigated mediterranean catchment. Water Resources Management 27 (10), 3607 -- 3622. 26 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Fair, K. R., C. T. Bauch, and M. Anand (2017). Dynamics of the global wheat trade network and resilience to shocks. Nature scientific reports 7. article number 7177. Giulioni, G. (2018). An agent-based modeling and simulation approach to commodity markets. Social Science Computer Review , 1 -- 16. Gutierrez, L. (2017, 06). Impacts of el nino-southern oscillation on the wheat market: A global dynamic analysis. PLOS ONE 12 (6), 1 -- 22. Iizumi, T., J.-J. Luo, A. J. Challinor, G. Sakurai, M. Yokozawa, H. Sakuma, M. E. Brown, and T. Yamagata (2014). Impacts of el nino southern oscillation on the global yields of major crops. Nat. Commun. 5. Khoury, C. K., A. D. Bjorkman, H. Dempewolf, J. Ramirez-Villegas, L. Guarino, A. Jarvis, L. H. Rieseberg, and P. C. Struik (2014). Increasing homogeneity in global food sup- plies and the implications for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (11), 4001 -- 4006. Konovalov, I. B., M. Beekmann, I. N. Kuznetsova, A. Yurova, and A. M. Zvyagintsev (2011). Atmospheric impacts of the 2010 russian wildfires: integrating modelling and measurements of an extreme air pollution episode in the moscow region. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11 (19), 10031 -- 10056. Lioubimtseva, E., K. M. de Beurs, and G. M. Henebry (2013). Grain production trends in russia, ukraine, and kazakhstan in the context of the global climate variability and change. In T. Younos and C. A. Grady (Eds.), Climate Change and Water Resources, pp. 121 -- 141. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Malovi´c, M. (2013). A mystery of the global surplus and its ramification. Industrija 41, 27 -- 48. Nguyen, T. P. L., L. Mula, R. Cortignani, G. Seddaiu, G. Dono, S. G. Virdis, M. Pasqui, and P. P. Roggero (2016). Perceptions of present and future climate change impacts on water availability for agricultural systems in the western mediterranean region. Water 8 (11). Pirrong, C. (2012). Commodity Price Dynamics: A Structural Approach. Cambridge University Press. R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Toscano, P., R. Ranieri, A. Matese, F. Vaccari, B. Gioli, A. Zaldei, M. Silvestri, C. Ronchi, P. L. Cava, J. Porter, and F. Miglietta (2012). Durum wheat modeling: The delphi system, 11 years of observations in italy. European Journal of Agronomy 43, 108 -- 118. Vignaroli, P., L. Rocchi, T. De Filippis, V. Tarchiani, M. Bacci, P. Toscano, M. Pasqui, and E. Rapisardi (2016, April). The Crop Risk Zones Monitoring System for resilience to drought in the Sahel. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Volume 18 of EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, pp. 16616. Welton, G. (2011). The impact of russia's 2010 grain export ban. Oxfam Policy and Practice: Agriculture, Food and Land 11 (5), 76 -- 107. Winne, J. D. and G. Peersman (2016). Macroeconomic Effects of Disruptions in Global Food Commodity Markets: Evidence for the United States. Brookings Papers on Eco- nomic Activity 2016 (2), 183 -- 286. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 27 Appendix A. Replicability and code availability The model used in this paper is available at the following link: https://github.com/gfgprojects/cms_wheat Both the source code and the documentation are available to interested people who wish to replicate the results or to develop the model. Furthermore, the scripts folder provides all the R scripts (R Core Team, 2018) used to generate the inputs for the model and for analyzing the simulations outcomes. The FAOSTAT dataset provides three levels of aggregation: country, regions and special groups. Our data preparation process starts from the regions level. Regions are aggregation of countries. The regions level has itself three levels of aggregation. The first one concerns partition of continents which include several countries. We will refer to this as the sub- continental level. The second one reports data from continents and the third one has data at world level. We start preparing the data using sub-continental data from Europe, Asia, Africa and Americas and we took directly continental data from Oceania. Because some important producer countries deserve an individual treatment we further partitioned sub-continents to explicitly account for them. As shown in Table 2, Northern America was broken down in the United States and its complement; Southern Asia in India, Pakistan and its complement; Eastern Asia in China and its complement; Eastern Europe in Russian Federation and its complement. This process lead us to partitioning the world in 24 geographic areas. Each component of the wheat balance was recorded in a text file (.csv file extension). These files have 24 lines each of them relating to one geographic area. They are stored in the scripts/generate_inputs/data folder. These data are further manipulated to obtain the files that are supplied as inputs to the ABM. The scripts/generate_inputs folder includes the R scripts which perform such manipulation and write files to the data folder where the ABM read inputs. The motivation for this manipulation is that data recorded by FAO are the outcome of markets bargaining. Our model simulates markets functioning and delivers the outcome of market bargaining. Therefore, FAO and simulation results can be compared. Hence, FAO data cannot be used directly as inputs for our model, but they can be used to get back to wheat demand and supply which are the required inputs for the model. A strategy would be to build a model for each of the balance component, i.e. a crop model for production, a selling strategy for the stock change and so on. However, this is a very demanding task that presents various difficulties. Consider for example the food component of demand. It is straightforward to think that its main determinant is population, however real data show how the dynamics of population and the food component moves in totally different manner in several countries. While building a model for each component of FAO balances is a valuable strategy in the long run, in this paper we adopt a method allowing us to obtain demand components in a relatively easy way. The idea behind the method was triggered by a check on FAOSTAT balances. If a sum over the balances of all the zones is performed, supplied and used quantities must coincide at global (world) level. This check revealed a systematic deviation of supplied and used quantities as shown in the left chart of Figure 14. This deviation is mainly due 28 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA to accounting problems concerning internationally traded goods (Malovi´c, 2013). In fact, at the global level, total imports and total export should coincide. This equality is not respected in the data. In the following we will introduce a formal notation where we will use capital letters to denote yearly quantities supplied by the dataset. The global net import in year t (GN It) defined by: (cid:88) GN It = (IM Pz,t − EXPz,t) where z runs on all the considered regions, is not zero. More precisely, if we compute the world supply in a given year t as Yt =(cid:80) world demand as Dt =(cid:80) z Dz,t we have z z Yz,t and the Yt − Dt = −GN It The unbalance at the world level is shown figure 14. We can now mine the data in order to ensure that world supply equals world demand, i.e GN I = 0 in each period. Starting from we can compute the mined level of supply, say y, as the level which meets FAO demand Yt − Dt + GN It = 0 Therefore Yt = Yt + GN It = (cid:18) Yt − Dt = 0 GN It 1 + Yt (cid:19) Yt = (1 + ηy t ) Yt t is a percentage deviation. Going back to figure 14, Y now overlaps the demand Where ηy line. On the other hand, we can compute the mined level of supply, say D, as the level which meets FAO supply (cid:18) Yt − Dt = 0 GN It (cid:19) (cid:16) (cid:17) Dt 1 + ηd t Dt = Dt = Dt − GN It = 1 − Dt therefore Where ηd t curve. is a percentage deviation. Going back to figure 14, D now overlaps the supply The discussion in the previous paragraph shows that we can modify data in order to achieve a given result. In this case the goal was to obtain GN It = 0. This also provides a method to go back from FAO balance data to the unknown level of demand and supply. In this case, we choose the goal of replicating the yearly weighted world price. We therefore undertook the endeavor of finding supply and demand percentage deviations which would make the model to better achieve the goal. We will denote these deviations as ηy t and ηd t . We adopt the simplification ηy t = 0 ∀t because supply is strongly influenced by production. We therefore focused on the ηd t s. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 29 Once the ηd t s has been set, we compute the desired demand for each country by com- puting the following value Dz,t = (1 − ηd t )Dz,t Based on the comparison between Dz,t and Yz,t we partition regions in two sets: the net international buyers set and its complement. A region belongs to the net international buyers set if Dz,t ≥ Yz,t ∀t. The idea behind this classification is that all the production of a net international buyer is employed in domestic uses. Therefore, a net international buyer has not a production to be sold to other countries, hence it does not has an international market. Summing up, regions are partitioned in the set of net international buyers and the set of international supplier. International suppliers organize international markets where they offer their production Yz,t. On the other hand, international suppliers direct their demand ( Dz,t) to their own or other international markets. Net international buyers direct their net demand Dz,t − Yz,t to international markets. market maker. The r_reduce_number_of_producers_food.R script transforms the aggregated data re- ducing the number of producers. The script outputs several files in the data folder. These files are loaded by the code in order to setup the simulation. This process allows us to reduce the number of international markets and to sift the It is worth noticing that the Dz,ts are given as input to the model and can be viewed as a country's desired quantities at an average price. The yearly data are then transformed in monthly dz,t values by the software at initialization time. The observed exchanges are in general different from those because a buyer will bought a higher (lower) quantity if the price is low (high). E-mail address: [email protected] 30 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA region with outgoing and incoming hub region with incoming hub only Figure 10. Commercial re- lationships from simulation output for 2010. region with outgoing and incoming hub region with incoming hub only Figure 11. Commercial re- lationships from simulation output for 2011. INVESTIGATING WHEAT INTERNATIONAL MARKET WITH A MULTI-AGENT MODEL 31 Figure 12. World weighted price with and without 2010 Russian Federa- tion ban. Figure 13. additional determinants of demand and supply to be considered ♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♣♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠•••••••••••1.01.52.02.5200020102020timenormalizedannualprice♠simwithban♣simwithoutban•realWeightedworldpricemodel for demandmodel for marketmodel for supplyfoodother usesfeedseedother factorstechnologiesenergyclimateother factorspolicy incentives..................32 G. GIULIONI, E. DI GIUSEPPE, M. PASQUI, P. TOSCANO, AND F. MIGLIETTA Figure 14. Unbalances in the data of FAOSTAT database. 19952000200520104.6e+085.0e+085.4e+085.8e+08production (black) and demand (red)timequantity
1811.01933	1	1811	2018-11-04T14:10:48	Characterizing Permissibility, Proper Rationalizability, and Iterated Admissibility by Incomplete Information	[ "econ.TH" ]	We characterize three interrelated concepts in epistemic game theory: permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility. We define the lexicographic epistemic model for a game with incomplete information. Based on it, we give two groups of characterizations. The first group characterizes permissibility and proper rationalizability. The second group characterizes permissibility in an alternative way and iterated admissibility. In each group, the conditions for the latter are stronger than those for the former, which corresponds to the fact that proper rationalizability and iterated admissibility are two (compatible) refinements of permissibility within the complete information framework. The intrinsic difference between the two groups are the role of rationality: the first group does not need it, while the second group does.	econ.TH	econ	Int J Game Theory manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Characterizing Permissibility, Proper Rationalizability, and Iterated Admissibility by Incomplete Information Shuige Liu Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract We characterize three interrelated concepts in epistemic game theory: per- missibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility. We define the lexico- graphic epistemic model for a game with incomplete information. Based on it, we give two groups of characterizations. The first group characterizes permissibility and proper rationalizability. The second group characterizes permissibility in an alterna- tive way and iterated admissibility. In each group, the conditions for the latter are stronger than those for the former, which corresponds to the fact that proper rational- izability and iterated admissibility are two (compatible) refinements of permissibility within the complete information framework. The intrinsic difference between the two groups are the role of rationality: the first group does not need it, while the second group does Keywords epistemic game theory · incomplete information · lexicographic belief · permissibility · proper rationalizability · iterated admissibility 1 Introduction The purpose of noncooperative game theory is to study an individual's decision mak- ing in an interactive situation. Since there one's payoff is not completely determined The author would like to express her gratitude to Andr´es Perea for his thorough reading of the early versions of this paper and his numerous valuable comments and suggestions. She also would like to thank J´anos Flesch, Funaki Yukihiko, Christian Bach, Abraham Neyman, Zsombor Z. M´eder, and Dmitriy Kvasov for their valuable discussions and encouragements. She thanks all teachers and students in the 4th Epicenter Spring Course on Epistemic Game Theory in Maastricht University for their inspiring teaching and stimulating discussions. She gratefully acknowledge the support of Grant-in-Aids for Young Scientists (B) of JSPS No.17K13707 and Grant for Special Research Project No. 2017K-016 of Waseda University. Shuige Liu Faculty of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-Ku, 169- 8050, Tokyo, Japan E-mail: shuige [email protected] 8 1 0 2 v o N 4 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 3 3 9 1 0 . 1 1 8 1 : v i X r a 2 Shuige Liu by her own choice, decision making requires her to form a belief on every other par- ticipant's choice, on every other participant's belief on every other's choice, and so on. Studying the structure of those belief hierarchies and choices supported by a be- lief hierarchy satisfying some particular conditions opened up a field called epistemic game theory. See Perea (2002) for a textbook on this field. In epistemic game theory, various concepts have been developed to describe spe- cific belief structures. One is lexicographic belief (Blume et al. 1991a, 1991b). A lexicographic belief describes a player's subjective conjecture about the opponents' behavior by a sequence of probability distributions over other participants' choices and types, which is different from the adoption of a single probability distribution in a standard probabilistic belief. The interpretation of a lexicographic belief is that every choice-type pair in the sequence is considered to be possible, while a pair oc- curring ahead in the sequence is deemed infinitely more likely than one occurring later. Several concepts have been developed by putting various conditions on lexico- graphic beliefs intended to capture different styles of reasoning about the opponents' behavior. Permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility are three important and interrelated concepts among them. Permissibility originated from Selten (1975)'s perfect equilibrium. It is defined and studied from the epistemic viewpoint by using lexicographic belief hierarchy in Brandenburger (1992) (an alternative approach without using lexicographic belief is given by Borgers, 1994). Permissibility is based on two notions: caution and primary belief in the opponents' rationality. A lexicographic belief is said to be cautious if it does not exclude any choice of the opponents; it is said to primarily believe in the opponents' rationality if its first level belief only deems possible those choice-type pairs where the choice is optimal under the belief of the paired type (Perea, 2012). Proper rationalizability originated from Myerson (1978)'s proper equilibrium which is intended to be a refinement of perfect equilibrium. It is defined and studied in Schuhmacher (1999) and Asheim (2001) as an epistemic concept. Proper rational- izability shares with permissibility the notion of caution, while, instead of primary belief in the opponents' rationality, it is based on a stronger notion called respecting the opponents' preferences which means that a "better" choice always occurs in front of a "worse" choice in a lexicographic belief. Iterated admissibility originated from the study of iteratively undominated choices (Bernheim, 1984, Pearce, 1984, Samuelson, 1992). In Brandenburger et al. (2008) and Perea (2012) it is explored as an epistemic concept by using lexicographic belief hierarchy. It is based on caution and a notion called assumption of rationality, which is also stronger than primary belief in the opponents' rationality. A lexicographic be- lief is said to assume the opponents' rationality if every "good" choice occurs and is always located in front of any "bad" one. Here good means that a choice of the opponent can be supported by a cautious belief of her, and bad means the opposite. We illustrate the three concepts by two examples. Example 1.1 (Permissibility and proper rationalizability) Consider a game where player 1 has strategies A and B and player 2 has strategies C, D, and E. Player 2's utility function u2 is illustrated in Table 1. Consider a lexicographic belief of player 1 on player 2's choices. Caution requires that all three choices of player 2 occur in Characterization by Incomplete Information 3 Table 1 A two-person game for permissibility and proper rationalizability u2 A B C 3 3 D 2 2 E 1 1 Table 2 A two-person game for iterated admissibility u2 A B C 3 3 D 2 2 E 1 4 that belief. Since C is player 2's most preferred choice, primary belief in player 2's rationality requires that only choice C can be put in the first level. Further, since player 2 prefers C to D and D to E, a lexicographic belief of player 1 respecting 2's preferences should deem C infinitely more likely than D and D infinitely more likely than E, that is, put C before D and D before E. Example 1.2 (Iterated admissibility) Consider u2 illustrated in Table 2 which is obtained from the one in Example 1.1 by changing u2(B, E) from 1 to 4. Here, C could be optimal for player 2 if she believes that player 1 will use choice A, and E could be optimal if she believes player 1 would use choice B, while D could never be optimal whatever player 2 believes about player 1's choices. Hence, a lexicographic belief of player 1 assuming player 2's rationality should deem C and E infinitely more likely than D. One motivation for developing lexicographic belief is to alleviate the tension be- tween caution and rationality (Blume et al., 1991a, Brandenburger, 1992, Borgers, 1994, Samuelson, 1992, Borgers and Samuelson, 1994). All the three concepts tried to solve the tension by sacrificing rationality in different ways. Indeed, permissibility requires that the first level belief contains only rational choices, proper rationalizabil- ity requires that choices should be ordered according to the level of rationality, and iterated admissibility requires that choices which could be rational to be put in front of those which can never be. However, due to caution all allow occurrences of irra- tional choices. This sacrifice of rationality brought conceptual inconvenience since rationality is a basic assumption in game theory and is reasonable to be adopted as a criterion for each player's belief. There is an approach which solves the tension without sacrificing rationality: us- ing an incomplete information framework. That is, instead of considering the uncer- tainty about the opponents' rationality within a complete information framework, we take the uncertainty about the opponents' utility functions and consider types within the incomplete information framework. Then the occurrence of a irrational choice can be explained as that the "real" utility function of an opponent is different from the original one. Permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility can all be characterized within an incomplete information framework. This is the basic idea of this paper. We use the above examples to explain this idea. 4 Shuige Liu Table 3 Alternative utility functions for player 2 v2 A B C 2 2 D 3 3 E 1 1 v′ 2 A B C 2 2 D 1 1 E 3 3 Table 4 An alternative utility function for player 2 w2 A B C 3 3 D 5 5 E 4 1 Example 1.1 (Continued) As mentioned before, though only choice C is rational for player 2, caution requires D and E to occur in player 1's belief as well. In a com- plete information framework, the occurrences of D and E are explained by player 2's irrationality (i.e., "trembling hand"). In contrast, within an incomplete informa- tion framework they are explained by the possibility that the "real" utility function of player 2 is not u2 but v2 or v′ 2 in Table 3. Choice D is optimal in v2 and E is optimal in v′ 2. In this manner, uncertainty about the opponent's rationality within a complete information framework is transformed into uncertainty about the opponent's real util- ity function within an incomplete information framework. It can be seen that primary belief in the opponent's rationality in complete information framework is equivalent to the condition that one deems u2 or a utility function "very similar" to u2 infinitely more likely to be the real utility function of player 2 than v2 and v′ 2, and respecting the opponent's preferences is equivalent to the condition that those alternative utility functions should be ordered by their "similarity" to u2. Example 1.2 (Continued) Since both C and E can be optimal in the original game, we only need a game to support choice D. Consider that the "real" utility function for player 2 is w2 illustrated in Table 4. Choice D is optimal in w2. It can be seen that assumption of player 2's rationality corresponds to that those utility function different from the original one to be less likely to the original one. In this paper, we study the equivalences between conditions in complete and in- complete information models for 2-person static games and provide characteriza- tions of permissibility, proper rationalizability, and assumption of rationality. First, we define the lexicographic epistemic model of a game with incomplete information. Then we give our characterization results which are separated into two groups. In the first group, we characterize permissibility and proper rationalizability, showing that a choice is permissible (properly rationalizable) within a complete information framework if and only if it is optimal for a belief hierarchy within the correspond- ing incomplete information framework that expresses common full belief in caution, primary belief in the opponent's utilities nearest to the original utilities (the oppo- nent's utilities are centered around the original utilities), and a best (better) choice is supported by utilities nearest (nearer) to the original ones. In the second group, we characterize permissibility in an alternative way and iterated admissibility, showing that a choice is permissible (iteratively admissible) Characterization by Incomplete Information 5 within a complete information model if and only there is a belief hierarchy within the corresponding incomplete information framework that expresses common full belief of caution, rationality, and primary belief in the original utilities (prior assumption of the original utilities and every good choice is supported). We will further show in Section 5.5 that caution can be weakened in this group of characterizations. Both proper rationalizability and iterated admissibility are refinements of permis- sibility (Perea, 2012). This can also be seen in the characterizations within the in- complete information models: in each group, each conditions for the latter is stronger than its counterpart for the former. The intrinsic difference between the two groups are the role of rationality: the first group does not need it , while the second group does. Nevertheless, we can construct a belief hierarchy which satisfies rationality and conditions in the first group. This corresponds to the fact that, within an complete information framework, it is always possible to have a belief hierarchy satisfying the conditions of proper rationalizability as well as those of iterated admissibility. This paper is not the first one characterizing concepts in epistemic game theory within the incomplete information framework. Perea and Roy (2017) characterized ε-proper rationalizability in this approach by using a standard epistemic model with- out lexicographic beliefs. They showed that a type in a standard epistemic model with complete information expresses common full belief in caution and ε-trembling condition if and only if there is a type in the corresponding model with incomplete information sharing the same belief hierarchy with it which expresses common belief in caution, ε-centered belief around the original utilities u, and belief in rationality under the closest utility function. Since each properly rationalizable choice is the limit of a sequence of ε-proper rationalizable ones, the conditions adopted in their characterizations are very useful for us. Two conditions in our characterization of proper rationalizability, that is, caution and u-centered belief, are faithful translations of their conditions into lexicographic model. However, the most critical condition in their characterization, that is, belief in rationality under the closest utility func- tion, is impossible to be adopted here. The reason is, as will be shown in Section 3.1, that a nearest utility function making a choice optimal does not always exist in lexicographic models. This is a salient difference between standard probabilistic be- liefs and lexicographic ones. We define a weaker condition called "a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to the original one" and show that it can be used to characterize proper rationalizability. Another essential difference between Perea and Roy (2017) and this paper is in the way of proof. Equivalence of belief hierarchies generated by types in models with complete and incomplete informations and type morphisms (Boge and Eisele, 1979, Heifetz and Samet, 1998, Perea and Kets, 2016) play important roles in Perea and Roy (2017)'s proof. In contrast, our proofs are based on constructing a specific correspondence between the two models. We show that conditions in a type of one model implies that appropriate conditions are satisfied in the corresponding type in the constructed model. Equivalence of hierarchies follows directly by construction. Our construction can also be used to prove Perea and Roy (2017)'s Theorem 6.1. Further, as will be discussed in Section 5.3, our construction shows that rationality is separable from other conditions in characterizing proper rationalizability. This con- 6 Shuige Liu firms that the consistency of caution and rationality within an incomplete information framework. Our results, as well as Perea and Roy (2017)'s, also provide insights in decision theory and general epistemology. They imply that any choice permissible, properly rationalizable, or iteratively admissible within a complete information framework is also optimal for a belief satisfying corresponding conditions within an incomplete information framework, and vice versa. In other words, by just looking at the out- come, it is impossible to know the accurate epistemic situation behind the choice, that is, whether it is because of players' uncertainty about the opponents' rationality or uncertainty about what are the real utilities of the opponents. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 defines permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility in epistemic models with complete information. Section 3 introduces the lexicographic epistemic model with incomplete information and defines two groups of conditions on the types in such a model. Sec- tion 4 gives two groups of characterizations and their proofs. Section 5 gives some concluding remarks. Section 6 contains the proofs of all lemmas. 2 Epistemic Model with Complete Information In this section, we give a survey of lexicographic epistemic model with complete information. Definitions here follow Perea (2012), Chapters 5-7. Consider a finite 2-person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I where I = {1, 2} is the set of players, Ci is the finite set of choices and ui : C1 × C2 → R is the utility function for player i ∈ I. In the following sometimes we denote C1 × C2 by C. We assume that each player has a lexicographic belief on the opponent's choices, a lexicographic belief on the opponent's lexicographic belief on her, and so on. This belief hierarchy is described by a lexicographic epistemic model with types. Definition 2.1 (Epistemic model with complete information). Consider a finite 2- person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I. A finite lexicographic epistemic model for Γ is a tuple Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I where (a) Ti is a finite set of types, and (b) bi is a mapping that assigns to each ti ∈ Ti a lexicographic belief over ∆(C j × Tj), i.e., bi(ti) = (bi1, bi2, ..., biK) where bik ∈ ∆(C j × Tj) for k = 1, ..., K. Consider ti ∈ Ti with bi(ti) = (bi1, bi2, ..., biK). Each bik (k = 1, ..., K) is called ti's level-k belief. For each (c j,t j) ∈ C j × Tj, we say ti deems (c j,t j) possible iff bik(c j,t j) > 0 for some k ∈ {1, ..., K}. We say ti deems t j ∈ Tj possible iff ti deems (c j,t j) possible for some c j ∈ C j. For each ti ∈ Ti, we denote by Tj(ti) the set of types in Tj deemed possible by ti. A type ti ∈ Ti is cautious iff for each c j ∈ C j and each t j ∈ Tj(ti), ti deems (c j,t j) possible. That is, ti takes into account each choice of player j for every belief hierar- chy of j deemed possible by ti. For each ci ∈ Ci, let ui(ci,ti) = (ui(ci, bi1)., .., ui(ci, biK)) where for each k = 1, ..., K, ui(ci, bik) := Σ(c j ,t j )∈C j ×Tj bik(c j,t j)ui(ci, c j), that is, each ui(ci, bik) is the ex- pected utility for ci over bik and ui(ci,ti) is a vector of expected utilities. For each Characterization by Incomplete Information 7 i, bi,k+1). i,ti), iff there is i, biℓ) for ℓ = 0, ..., k, and i ∈ Ci, we say that ti prefers ci to c′ ci, c′ i, denoted by ui(ci,ti) > ui(c′ k ∈ {0, ..., K − 1} such that the following two conditions are satisfied: (a) ui(ci, biℓ) = ui(c′ (b) ui(ci, bi,k+1) > ui(c′ We say that ti is indifferent between ci and c′ i,ti), iff ui(ci, bik) = ui(c′ i, bik) for each k = 1, ..., K. It can be seen that this preference relation on Ci under each type ti is a linear order. ci is rational (or optimal) for ti iff ti does not prefer any choice to ci. A type ti ∈ Ti primarily believes in the opponent's ratio- nality iff ti's level-1 belief only assigns positive probability to those (c j,t j) where c j is rational for t j. That is, at least in the primary belief ti is convinced that j behaves rationally given her belief. i, denoted by ui(ci,ti) = ui(c′ For (c j,t j), (c′ j,t′ j) ∈ C j × Tj, we say that ti deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely j) iff there is k ∈ {0, ..., K − 1} such that the following two conditions are j,t′ than (c′ satisfied: (a) biℓ(c j,t j) = biℓ(c′ (b) bi,k+1(c j,t j) > 0 and bi,k+1(c′ j,t′ j) = 0 for ℓ = 0, ..., k, and j,t′ j) = 0. j ∈ C j where t j prefers c j to c′ A cautious type ti ∈ Ti respects the opponent's preferences iff for each t j ∈ Tj(ti) and c j, c′ j, ti deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j,t j). That is, ti arranges j's choices from the most to the least preferred for each belief hierarchy of j deemed possible by ti. It can be seen that respect of the oppo- nent's preferences implies primary belief in the opponent's rationality. Indeed, the former requires that each type of the opponent deemed possible in the primary belief should only pair with choices most preferred under that type. Let P be an arbitrary property of lexicographic beliefs. We define that (a) ti ∈ Ti expresses 0-fold full belief in P iff ti satisfies P; (b) For each n ∈ N, ti ∈ Ti expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in P iff ti only deems possible j's types that express n-fold full belief in P. A type ti expresses common full belief in P iff it expresses n-fold full belief in P for each n ∈ N. Definition 2.2 (Permissibility and proper rationalizability). Consider a finite lex- icographic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for a game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I . ci ∈ Ci is permissible iff it is rational for some ti ∈ Ti which expresses common full belief in caution and primary belief in rationality. ci is properly rationalizable iff it is ratio- nal for some ti ∈ Ti which expresses common full belief in caution and respect of preferences. Since respect of the opponent's preferences implies primary belief in the oppo- nent's rationality, proper rationalizability implies permissibility, while the reverse does not hold. A cautious type ti ∈ Ti assumes the j's rationality iff the following two conditions are satisfied: (a) for all of player j's choices c j that are optimal for some cautious belief, ti deems possible some cautious type t j for which c j is optimal; 8 Shuige Liu (b) ti deems all choice-type pairs (c j,t j) where t j is cautious and c j is optimal for t j infinitely more likely than any choice-type pairs (c′ j) that does not have this property. j,t′ Informally speaking, assumption of the opponent's rationality is that ti puts all "good" choices in front of those "bad" choices. On the other hand, extending assumption of rationality into n-fold for any n ∈ N is more complicated than n-fold full belief. Formally, consider a finite lexicographic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for a game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I . A cautious type ti ∈ Ti expresses 1-fold assumption of rationality iff it assumes j's rationality. For any n ∈ N, we say that a cautious type ti ∈ Ti expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of rationality iff the following two conditions are satisfied: (a) whenever a choice c j of player j is optimal for some cautious type (not necessarily in Mco) that expresses up to n-fold assumption of rationality, ti deems possible some cautious type t j for player j which expresses up to n-fold assumption of rationality for which c j is optimal; (b) ti deems all choice-type pair (c j,t j) where t j is cautious and expresses up to n- fold assumption of rationality and c j is optimal for t j infinitely more likely than any choice-type pair (c′ j) that does not satisfy this property. j,t′ We say that ti expresses common assumption of rationality iff it expresses n-fold assumption of rationality for every n ∈ N. Definition 2.3 (Iterated admissibility). Consider a finite lexicographic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for a game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I . ci is iteratively admissible iff it is rational for some ti ∈ Ti which expresses common assumption of rationality. 3 Epistemic Model with Incomplete Information In this section, we define the lexicographic epistemic model with incomplete infor- mation which is the counterpart of the probabilistic epistemic model with incomplete information introduced by Battigalli (2003) and extensively developed in Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2003), (2007), and Dekel and Siniscalchi (2015). We also define conditions on types in such a model. Definition 3.1 (Lexicographic epistemic model with incomplete information). Consider a finite 2-person static game form G = (Ci)i∈I. For each i ∈ I, let Vi be the set of utility functions vi : C1 × C2 → R. A finite lexicographic epistemic model for G with incomplete information is a tuple Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I where (a) Θi is a finite set of types, (b) wi is a mapping that assigns to each θi ∈ Θi a utility function wi(θi) ∈ Vi, and (c) βi is a mapping that assigns to each θi ∈Θi a lexicographic belief over ∆(C j ×Θj), i.e., βi(θi) = (βi1,βi2, ...,βiK) where βik ∈ ∆(C j ×Θj) for k = 1, ..., K. Concepts such as "θi deems (c j,θj) possible" and "θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than (c′ j)" can be defined in a similar way as in Section 2. For each θi ∈ Θi, we use Θj(θi) to denote the set of types in Θj deemed possible by θi. For j,θ′ Characterization by Incomplete Information 9 each θi ∈ Θi and vi ∈ Vi, θvi i wi(θvi is the auxiliary type satisfying that βi(θvi i ) = βi(θi) and i ) = vi. For each ci ∈ Ci, vi ∈ Vi, and θi ∈ Θi with βi(θi) = (βi1,βi2, ...,βiK), let vi(ci,θi) = (vi(ci,βi1), ..., vi(ci,βiK)) where vi(ci,βik) := Σ(c j ,θj )∈C j×Θjβik(c j,θj)vi(ci, c j) for each k = 1, ..., K, For each ci, c′ i iff wi(θi)(ci,θi) > wi(θi)(c′ two vectors. ci is rational (or optimal) for θi iff θi does not prefer any choice to ci. i,θi). As in Section 2, this is also the lexicographic comparison between i ∈ Ci and θi ∈Θi, we say that θi prefers ci to c′ In the following we define two groups of conditions on types in an epistemic model with incomplete information, which correspond to the two groups of charac- terizations in Section 4. 3.1 The first group of conditions Definition 3.2 (Caution). A type θi ∈Θi is cautious iff for each c j ∈ C j and each θj ∈ Θj(θi), there is some utility function v j ∈ Vj such that θi deems (c j,θ v j j ) possible. This is a faithful translation of Perea and Roy (2017)'s definition of caution in a probabilistic model into a lexicographic one. It is the counterpart of caution defined within the complete information framework in Section 2; the only difference is that in incomplete information models we allow different utility functions since c j will be required to be rational for the paired type. For each ui, vi ∈ Vi, we define the distance d(ui, vi) between ui, vi by d(ui, vi) = [Σs∈S(ui(s) − vi(s))2]1/2. This is the Euclidean distance on RC. We choose it is just out of simplicity. Any distance satisfying the three conditions in Section 3.3 of Perea and Roy (2017) also works in our characterization. A problem here is that utility functions are numerical representations of prefer- ences, yet the Euclidean distance measures cardinal similarity between utility func- tions rather than the similarity between preferences they represent. For example, though multiplying ui with a positive number leads to the same preferences repre- sented by ui, its Euclidean distance from ui may be large. In Section 5.4 we will define an ordinal distance on Vi and show that the characterizations still hold under that distance. Definition 3.3 (Primary belief in utilities nearest to u and u-centered belief). Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, a lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information, and a pair u = (ui)i∈I of utility functions. (3.1) A type θi ∈ Θi primarily believes in utilities nearest to u iff θi's level-1 be- lief only assigns positive probability to (c j,θj) which satisfies that d(w j(θj), u j) ≤ d(w j(θ′ (3.2) A type θi ∈ Θi has u-centered belief iff for any c j, c′ j ∈ Θj(θi) with βj(θ′ j ∈ C j, any θj ∈ Θj, and any j), u j) for all θ′ j) = βj(θj). v j, v′ v j j ) and (c′ j ∈ Vj such that (c j,θ v′ j j,θ j ) are deemed possible by θi, it holds that θi deems (c j,θ v j j ) infinitely more likely than (c′ v′ j ) whenever d(v j, u j) < d(v′ j j,θ j, u j). Definition 3.3 gives restrictions on the order of types in a lexicographic belief. (3.1) requires that θi primarily believes in type θj only if θj's utility function is the 10 Shuige Liu Table 5 No nearest utility function in lexicographic beliefs u1 A B C D 1 1 1 E 1 1 0 F 1 0 1 nearest one to u j among all types deemed possible by θi which share the same belief with θj. (3.2) requires that the types of j sharing the same belief deemed possible by θi are arranged according to the distance of their assigned utility functions from u j : the farther a type θj's utility function is from u j, the later θj occurs in the lexico- graphic belief of θi. (3.2) is a faithful translation of Perea and Roy (2017)'s Definition 3.2 into lexicographic model and (3.1) is weaker than (3.2). The essential difference between our conditions and Perea and Roy (2017)'s lies in the following definition. Definition 3.4 (A best (better) choice is supported by utilities nearest (nearer) to u). Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, a lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information, and a pair u = (ui)i∈I of utility functions. (4.1) A type θi ∈ Θi believes in that a best choice of j is supported by utilities nearest to u iff for any (c j,θj), (c′ j,θ′ j), if c j is optimal for βj(θj) in u j but c′ (4.2) A type θi ∈ Θi believes in that a better choice of nearer to u iff for any (c j,θj), (c′ if u j(c j,θj) > u j(c′ j) deemed possible by θi with βj(θj) = βj(θ′ j is not, then d(w j(θj), u j) < d(w j(θ′ j) deemed possible by θi with βj(θj) = βj(θ′ j is supported by utilities j), j), u j). j,θ′ j,θ′ j), then d(w j(θj), u j) < d(w j(θ′ j), u j). Definition 3.4 gives restriction on the relation between paired choices and types. (4.1) requires that for each belief of player j, a choice optimal for that belief should be supported by the nearest utility function to u j. (4.2) requires that for each belief of player j, a utility function supporting a "better" choice (i.e., c j) should be nearer to u j than one supporting a "worse" choice (i.e., c′ j). It can be seen that (4.2) is stronger than (4.1). (4.2) is similar to Perea and Roy (2017)'s Definition 3.3 which requires that for each (c j,θj) deemed possible by θi, w j(θj) is the nearest utility function in Vj to u j among those in which c j is rational under βj(θj). It can be shown by Lemmas 5.4 and 5.5 in Perea and Roy (2017) that Definition 3.4 (4.2) is weaker than Perea and Roy [21]'s Definition 3.3. We adopt it here since a nearest utility function does not in general exist for lexicographic beliefs. That is, given u j ∈ Vj, c j ∈ C j, and a lexicographic belief βj, there may not exist v j ∈ Vj satisfying that (1) c j is rational at v j under βj, and (2) there is no v′ j for βj and d(v′ j ∈ Vj such that c j is rational at v′ j, u j) < d(v j, u j). See the following example. Example 3.1 (No nearest utility function). Consider a game Γ where player 1 has choices A, B, and C and player 2 has choices D, E, and F. The payoff function u1 of player 1 is shown in Table 5. Let β1 = (D, E, F), that is, player 1 deems player 2's Characterization by Incomplete Information 11 Table 6 A worse choice is supported by a better utility function u1 D A B C 1 1 + d 2 1 E 1 1 0 F 1 0 1 choice D infinitely more likely than E and E infinitely more likely than F. In u1, A is rational for β1 but B is not. 1 in Table 6. B is also rational at v′ Now we show that there is no nearest utility function to u1 at which B is rational under β1. Suppose there is such a function v1 ∈ V1. Let d = d(v1, u1). It can be seen that d > 0. Consider v′ 1, u1) = d 2 < d = d(v1, u1), a contradiction. Also, though β1 prefers B to C in u1, it can be seen that for each utility function vB 1 ∈ V1 satisfying (1) C is optimal in vC 1 , u1). Indeed, this can be done by letting vC 1 (c1, c2) = u1(c1, c2) for all other (c1, c2) ∈ C1 × C2. 1 in which B is rational under β1, there is some vC 1 under β1, and (2) d(vC 1 under β1, while d(v′ 1 (C, D) = 1 + d(vB 1 , u1)/2 and vC 1 , u1) < d(vB Example 3.1 shows that the relationship between preferences among choices and the distance of utility functions from the original one is more complicated for lexico- graphic beliefs. That is why we adopt Definition 3.4 (4.2) here. The following lemma guarantees the existence of utility functions satisfying the condition in Definition 3.4 (4.2). It shows that, given a utility function ui and a lexicographic belief βi, corre- sponding to the sequence ci1, ..., ciN of i's choices arranged from the most to the least preferred at ui under βi, there is a sequence vi1, ..., viN of utility functions arranged from the nearest to the farthest to ui such that for each n = 1, ..., N, cin is rational at vin under βi. This lemma plays a similar role in our characterizations as Lemmas 5.4 and 5.5 in Perea and Roy [21]. Lemma 3.1 (Existence of utilities satisfying Definition 3.4 (4.2)). Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, ui ∈ Vi, and βi = (βi1,βi2, ...,βiK) such that βik ∈ ∆(C j) for each k = 1, ..., K. Let Πi(βi) = (Ci1,Ci2, ...,CiL) be a partition of Ci satisfying that (1) for each ℓ = 1, ..., L and each ciℓ, c′ iℓ,βi), and (2) for each ℓ = 1, ..., L − 1, each ciℓ ∈ Ciℓ and ci,ℓ+1 ∈ Ci,ℓ+1, ui(ciℓ,βi) > ui(ci,ℓ+1,βi). That is, Πi(βi) is the sequence of equivalence classes of choices in Ci arranged from the most preferred to the least preferred under βi. iℓ ∈ Ciℓ, ui(ciℓ,βi) = ui(c′ Then there are vi1, ..., viL ∈ Vi satisfying (a) vi1 = ui, (b) For each ℓ = 1, ..., L and each ciℓ ∈ Ciℓ, ciℓ is rational at viℓ under βi, and (c) For each ℓ = 1, ..., L − 1, d(viℓ, ui) < d(vi,ℓ+1, ui). 3.2 The second group of conditions Definition 3.5 (Belief in rationality). θi ∈ Θi believes in j's rationality iff θi deems (c j,θj) possible only if c j is rational for θj. 12 Shuige Liu In an incomplete information model, since each type is assigned with a belief on the opponent's choice-type pairs as well as a payoff function, caution and a full belief of rationality can be satisfied simultaneously. The consistency of caution and ratio- nality is the essential difference of models with incomplete information from those with complete information. Rationality does not appear in the first group of charac- terizations, but in the proofs we will construct incomplete information models whose types satisfies all the conditions as well as common full belief in rationality. On the other hand, rationality plays an important role in the characterization of the second group. We will discuss more about this consistency between caution and rationality in Sections 5.3. Definition 3.6 (Primary belief in u and prior assumption of u). Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, a lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information, and a pair u = (ui)i∈I of utility functions. (6.1) θi ∈ Θi primarily believes in u iff θi's level-1 belief only assigns positive prob- ability to (c j,θj) with w j(θj) = u j. (6.2) θi ∈ Θi prior assumes u iff for any (c j,θj) with θj cautious deemed possible by θi satisfying that w j(θj) = u j, then θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than any pair does not satisfy that property. Primary belief in u is stronger than Definition 3.3 (3.1). (3.1) allows the occur- rence of a type with a utility function which is very similar (but not necessarily equal) to u j in the level-1 belief of θi, while primary belief in u only allows types with utility function u j there. (6.2) is stronger than (6.1) since (6.2) requires that all choice-type pairs which believes in u should be put in front of pairs which do not believe in u, while (6.1) only requires that level-1 belief believes in u. Definition 3.7 (Every good choice is supported). Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, a lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information, and a pair u = (ui)i∈I of utility functions. A cautious type θi ∈ Θi as- j is supported iff for each c j that is optimal for sumes that every good choice of some cautious type of j (may not be in Min) with u j as its assigned utility function, θi deems possible a cautious type θj ∈ Θj such that w j(θj) = u j and c j is optimal for θj. Common assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported is, as common assumption of rationality in incomplete information model, more compli- cated from common full belief. We have the following definition. Definition 3.8 (n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is sup- ported) Consider a static game form G = (Ci)i∈I, a lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information, and a pair u = (ui)i∈I of util- ity functions. θi ∈ Θi expresses 1-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported iff it prior assumes u and assumes that every good choice of j is supported. For any n ∈ N, we say that a cautious type θi ∈ Θi expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported iff the following two conditions are satisfied: (a) whenever a choice c j of player j is optimal for some cautious type (not necessarily in Min) with u j as its assigned utility function that expresses up to n-fold assumption Characterization by Incomplete Information 13 of that every good choice is supported, θi deems possible some cautious type θj with w j(θj) = u j for player j which expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported for which c j is optimal. (b) θi deems all choice-type pairs (c j,θj), where θj is cautious and expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported and satisfies w j(θj) = u j, infinitely more likely than any choice-type pair (c′ j) that does not satisfy this property. j,θ′ We say that ti expresses common assumption of prior u and in that every good choice is supported iff it expresses n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported for every n ∈ N. 4 Characterizations So far we have introduced conditions under two different frameworks for static games: one includes permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility within a complete information framework, the other contains various conditions on types within an incomplete information framework. In this section we will show that there are correspondences between them. The characterizations will be separated into two groups: in the first group we characterize permissibility and proper rationalizabil- ity, and in the second group we characterize permissibility in an alternative way and iterated admissibility. The critical difference between the two groups is the role of rationality. 4.1 Without rationality: permissibility and proper rationalizability In this subsection we give characterizations of permissibility and proper rationaliz- ability. An illustrative example will also be provided. Theorem 4.1 (Characterization of permissibility). Consider a finite 2-person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I and the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I. Then, c∗ i ∈ Ci is permissible if and only if there is some finite lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for G and some θ∗ i ∈ Θi with wi(θ∗ (a) c∗ (b) θ∗ u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. i is rational for θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to i ) = ui such that i , and, Theorem 4.2 (Characterization of proper rationalizability). Consider a finite 2- person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I and the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I. Then, c∗ i ∈ Ci is properly rationalizable if and only if there is some finite lexico- i ) = i ∈ Θi with wi(θ∗ graphic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G and some θ∗ ui such that (a) c∗ (b) θ∗ choice is supported by utilities nearer to u. i is rational for θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better i , and 14 Shuige Liu Table 7 The game for Example 4.1 u1\u2 D E F A B C 0, 3 1, 3 1, 3 1, 2 0, 2 1, 2 1, 1 1, 1 0, 1 Table 8 Alternative utility functions for players 1 and 2 v1 A B C D 0 2 1 E 1 0 1 F 1 1 0 v′ 1 A B C D 3 2 1 E 1 0 1 F 1 1 0 v2 A B C D 3 3 3 E 2 2 4 F 1 1 1 v′ 2 A B C D 3 3 3 E 2 2 4 F 1 1 5 To show these statements, we will construct a correspondence between complete information models and incomplete ones and show that conditions on a type in one model can be transformed into proper conditions on the corresponding type in the constructed model. We use the following example to show the intuition. Example 4.1. Consider the game Γ in Table 7(Perea, 2012, p.190) and the lexico- graphic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for Γ where T1 = {t1}, T2 = {t2}, and b1(t1) = ((D,t2), (E,t2), (F,t2)), b2(t2) = ((C,t1), (B,t1), (A,t1)). It can be seen that D is properly rationalizable (and therefore permissible) since it is rational for t2 which expresses common full belief in caution and respect of preferences. Consider the lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for the corresponding game form where Θ1 = {θ11,θ12,θ13}, Θ2 = {θ21,θ22,θ23}, and w1(θ11) = u1, β1(θ11) = ((D,θ21), (E,θ22), (F,θ23)), w1(θ12) = v1, β1(θ12) = ((D,θ21), (E,θ22), (F,θ23)), w1(θ13) = v′ 1, β1(θ13) = ((D,θ21), (E,θ22), (F,θ23)), w2(θ21) = u2, β2(θ21) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)), w2(θ22) = v2, β2(θ22) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)), w2(θ23) = v′ 2, β2(θ23) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)). where the alternative utility functions are shown in Table 8. For each i ∈ I, θi1, θi2, and θi3 have the same belief; the only difference lies in their assigned utility functions since each should support some choice. The relation between Min and Mco can be seen clearly: for each i ∈ I, θi1, θi2, and θi3 correspond to ti in the sense that the belief of the former is obtained by replacing every occurrence of t j in the belief of ti by the type corresponding to t j in Min at which the paired choice is optimal. It can be seen that θ11 expresses common full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u (therefore primary belief in utilities nearest to u and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u). Also, since the assigned utility function of θ11 is u1, C is rational for θ11. Characterization by Incomplete Information 15 4.2 With rationality: permissibility and iterated admissibility In this subsection we give an alternative characterization of permissibility and a char- acterization of iterated admissibility. Since the correspondence between models with complete information and incomplete information are basically the same with the previous group, here the results are given without examples. Theorem 4.3 (An alternative characterization of permissibility). Consider a finite 2-person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I and the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I . Then, c∗ i ∈ Θi with wi(θ∗ i ∈ Ci is permissible in Mco if and only if there is some finite lexico- graphic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for G and some θ∗ (a) c∗ (b) θ∗ Theorem 4.4 (Characterization of iterated admissibility). Consider a finite 2- person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I and the corresponding game form G = (Ci). i is rational for θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, rationality, and primary belief in u. i ) = ui such that i , and, Then c∗ i ∈ Ci is iteratively admissible if and only if there is some finite epistemic i ∈ Θi with model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for G and some θ∗ wi(θ∗ (a) c∗ (b) θ∗ of prior u and that every good choice is supported. i ) = ui such that i is rational for θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, rationality, and common assumption i , and 4.3 Proof of Theorem 4.1 To show the only-if part of Theorem 4.1 (and that of all other theorems), we construct the following mapping from finite lexicographic epistemic models with complete in- formation to those with incomplete information. Consider Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I and a finite lexicographic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I with complete information for Γ. We first define types in a model with incomplete information in the following two steps: Step 1. For each i ∈ I and ti ∈ Ti, let Πi(ti) = (Ci1, ...,CiL) be the sequence of equiv- alence classes of choices in Ci arranged from the most preferred to the least pre- ferred under ti. By Lemma 3.1, for each Ciℓ there is some viℓ(ti) ∈ Vi such that each choice in Ciℓ is rational at viℓ(ti) under ti, and 0 = d(vi1(ti), ui) < d(vi2(ti), ui) < ... < d(viL(ti), ui). Step 2. We define Θi(ti) = {θi1(ti), ...,θiL(ti)} where for each ℓ = 1, ..., L, the type θiℓ(ti) satisfies that (1) wi(θiℓ(ti)) = viℓ(ti), and (2) βi(θiℓ(ti)) is obtained from bi(ti) by replacing every (c j,t j) with c j ∈ C jr ∈ Πj(t j) for some r with (c j,θj) where θj = θjr(t j), that is, w j(θj) is the utility function among those corresponding to Πj(t j) in which c j is the rational for ti. For each i ∈ I, let Θi = ∪ti∈TiΘi(ti). Here we have constructed a finite lexico- graphic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I with incomplete information. It should be noted that Min is not uniquely deter- mined since there are multiple sequences of utility functions satisfying the conditions in Lemma 3.1. 16 Shuige Liu Table 9 The game for Example 4.2 u1\u2 C A B 1, 0 0, 0 D 0, 1 0, 1 Table 10 Utility functions of player 1 corresponding to t1 and t2 v12(t1) A B C 1 0 D 0 1 v22(t2) A B C 2 0 D 1 1 We show how this construction works by the following example. Example 4.2. Consider the game Γ in Table 9 (Perea, 2012, p.188) and the lexico- graphic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I of Γ where T1 = {t1}, T2 = {t2}, and b1(t1) = ((D,t2), (C,t2)), b2(t2) = ((A,t1), (B,t1)). We show how to construct a corresponding model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I . First, by Step 1 it can be seen that Π1(t1) = ({A}, {B}) and Π2(t2) = ({D}, {C}). We let v11(t1) = u1 where A is rational for t1 and v12(t1) where B is rational for t1 as follows. Similarly, we let v21(t2) = u2 where D is rational under t2 and v22(t2) where C is rational under t2 as follows: Then we go to Step 2. It can be seen that Θ1(t1) = {θ11(t1),θ12(t1)}, where w1(θ11(t1)) = v11(t1), β1(θ11(t1)) = ((D,θ21(t2)), (C,θ22(t2))), w1(θ12(t1)) = v12(t1), β1(θ12(t1)) = ((D,θ21(t2)), (C,θ22(t2))). Also, Θ2(t2) = {θ21(t2),θ22(t2)}, where w2(θ21(t2)) = v21(t2), β2(θ21(t2)) = ((A,θ11(t1)), (B,θ12(t1))), w2(θ22(t2)) = v22(t2), β2(θ22(t2)) = ((A,θ11(t1)), (B,θ12(t1))). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco con- i ). structed by the two steps above. We have the following observations. Observation 4.1 (Redundancy). For each ti ∈ Ti and each θi,θ′ βi(θ′ Observation 4.2 (Rationality). Each θi ∈ Θi(ti) believes in j's rationality. Observation 4.3 (A better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u). Each θi ∈ Θi(ti) believes that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u. i ∈ Θi(ti), βi(θi) = The observations are true by construction. Observation 4.1 means that the differ- ence between any two types in a Θi(ti) is in the utility functions assigned to them. Observation 4.2 means that in an incomplete information model constructed from one with complete information, each type believes in the opponent's rationality. This is because in the construction, we requires that for each pair (c j,t j) occurring in Characterization by Incomplete Information 17 a belief, its counterpart in the incomplete information replaces t j by type in Θj(t j) with the utility function in which c j is optimal for t j. It follows from Observation 4.2 that each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses common full belief in rationality. Observation 4.3 implies that the best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. It follows that each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses common full belief in that a best (better) choice is supported by utilities nearest (nearer) to u. By construction, each ti shares the same belief about j's choices at each level with each θi ∈ Θi(ti); also, for each ti ∈ Ti, the utility function assigned to θi1(ti) is ui. It is clear that any ci rational for ti is also rational for θi1(ti). Therefore, to show the only-if part of Theorem 4.1, we show that if ti expresses common full belief in caution and primary belief in rationality, then θi1(ti) expresses common belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. Lemma 4.1 (Cautionco → Cautionin). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco. If ti ∈ Ti expresses common full belief in caution, so does each θi ∈ Θi(ti). Lemma 4.2 (Primary belief in rationality → primary belief in utilities nearest to u). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco. If ti ∈ Ti expresses common full belief in primary belief in rationality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) ex- presses common full belief in primary belief in utilities nearest to u. Proof of the only-if part of Theorem 4.1. Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I , Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco, a permissible choice c∗ i ∈ Ti which is a type ex- pressing common full belief in caution and primary belief in rationality such that c∗ i is rational for t∗ i ) has the same distribution on j's choices at each level as bi(t∗ i . Also, it follows from Observation 4.3 and Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 that θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. (cid:3) i ). By definition, wi(θ∗ i is rational for θ∗ i . Let θ∗ i = θi1(t∗ i ∈ Ci, and t∗ i ) = ui and βi(θ∗ i ). Hence c∗ i ∈ Θi : βi(θ′ To show the if part, we need a mapping from models with incomplete infor- mation to those with complete information. Consider a finite 2-person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I, the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I, and a finite epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information. We construct a model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for Γ with complete information as follows. For each θi ∈ Θi, we define Ei(θi) = {θ′ i ) = β(θi)}. In this way Θi is partitioned into several equivalence classes Ei = {Ei1, ..., EiL} where for each ℓ = 1, .., L, Eiℓ = Ei(θi) for some θi ∈ Θi. To each Ei ∈ Ei we use ti(Ei) to denote a type. We define bi(ti(Ei)) to be a lexicographic belief which is obtained from βi(θi) by replacing each occurrence of (c j,θj) by (c j,t j(E j(θj))); in other words, bi(ti(Ei)) has the same distribution on choices at each level as βi(θi) for each θi ∈ Ei, while each θj ∈ Θj(θi) is replaced by t j(E j(θj)). For each i ∈ I, let Ti = {ti(Ei)}Ei∈Ei. We have constructed from Min a finite epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I with complete information for Γ. We show how this construction works by the following example. Example 4.3. Consider the game Γ in Example 4.2 and the model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I 18 Shuige Liu for the corresponding game form where Θ1 = {θ11,θ12}, Θ2 = {θ21,θ22}, and w1(θ11) = u1, β1(θ11) = ((D,θ21), (C,θ22)), w1(θ12) = v1, β1(θ12) = ((D,θ21), (C,θ22)), w2(θ21) = u2, β2(θ21) = ((A,θ11), (B,θ12)), w2(θ22) = v2, β2(θ22) = ((A,θ11), (B,θ12)). where v1 = v12(t1) and v2 = v22(t2) in Example 4.2. It can be seen that E1 = {{θ11,θ12}} since β1(θ11) = β1(θ12) and E2 = {{θ21,θ22}} since β2(θ21) = β2(θ22). Correspond- ing to those equivalence classes we have t1({θ11,θ12}) and t2({θ21,θ22}), and b1(t1({θ11,θ12})) = ((D,t2({θ21,θ22})), (C,t2({θ21,θ22}))), b2(t2({θ21,θ22})) = ((A,t1({θ11,θ12})), (B,t1({θ11,θ12}))). It can be seen that this is the reversion of the previous construction if each type has distinct belief on choices of the opposite. Indeed, let Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I satisfying that bi(ti) 6= bi(t′ i , and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I be constructed from Mco by the previous two steps. Then Ei = {Θi(ti)}ti∈Ti and ti(Θi(ti)) = ti for each i ∈ I. i ∈ Ti with ti 6= t′ i ) for each ti,t′ To show the if part of Theorem 4.1, we need the following lemmas. Lemma 4.3 (Cautionin → Cautionco). Consider Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min constructed by the above approach. If θi ∈ Θi ex- presses common full belief in caution, so does ti(Ei(θi)). Lemma 4.4 (Cautionin + primary belief in utilities nearest to u + a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u → Primary belief in rationality). Consider Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min. If θi ∈ Θi expresses common full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses common full belief in primary belief in rationality. Proof of the if part of Theorem 4.1. Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min and c∗ i ) = ui which expresses common full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. Consider ti(Ei(θ∗ i ))) has the same distribution on j's choices at each level as βi(θ∗ is rational for i )). Also, by Lemmas 4.3 and 4.4, ti(Ei(θ∗ ti(Ei(θ∗ i )) expresses common full belief in caution and primary belief in rationality. Hence c∗ i is permissible in Γ. (cid:3) i ∈ Ci rational for some θ∗ i ) = ui and bi(ti(Ei(θ∗ i )). Since wi(θ∗ i with wi(θ∗ i ), c∗ i 4.4 Proof of Theorem 4.2 To show the only-if part of Theorem 4.2, we need the following lemmas. Lemma 4.5 (Respect of preferences → u-centered belief). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco constructed by the two steps in Sec- tion 4.3. If ti ∈ Ti expresses common full belief in caution and respect of preferences, Characterization by Incomplete Information 19 then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses full belief in u-centered belief. Proof of the only-if part of Theorem 4.2. Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I , Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco, a properly rationalizable c∗ i ∈ Ci, and t∗ mon full belief in caution and respect of preferences such that c∗ θ∗ i = θi1(t∗ as bi(t∗ i ), c∗ 4.1 and 4.5 that θ∗ better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u. (cid:3) i ∈ Ti expressing com- i is rational for t∗ i . Let i ) has the same distribution on j's choices i . Also, it follows from Observations 4.3 and Lemmas i expresses common belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a i ). Since wi(θ∗ i is rational for θ∗ i ) = ui and βi(θ∗ To show the if part, we need the following lemma. Lemma 4.6 (Cautionin + u-centered belief + a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u → respect of preferences). Consider Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min constructed by the approach in Section 4.3. If θi ∈ Θi expresses common full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses common full be- lief in respect of preferences. Proof of the if part of Theorem 4.2. Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min and c∗ i ) = ui which expresses common belief in caution, rationality, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by util- ities nearer to u. Consider ti(Ei(θ∗ i have the same distribution on j's choices in each level, c∗ i )). Also, it follows from Lemmas 4.3 and 4.6 that ti(Ei(θ∗ i )) expresses common full belief in caution and respect of preferences. Hence c∗ i ∈ Ci be rational for some θ∗ i is rational for ti(Ei(θ∗ i is properly rationalizable in Γ. (cid:3) i with wi(θ∗ i )). Since wi(θ∗ i ) = ui and ti(Ei(θ∗ i )) and θ∗ 4.5 Proof of Theorem 4.3 The only-if part of Theorem 4.3 follows directly from Observation 4.2, Lemma 4.1, and the following lemma whose proof can be found in Section 6. Lemma 4.7 (Primary belief in rationality → Primary belief in u). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco. If ti ∈ Ti expresses common full belief in primary belief in rationality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses common full belief in primary belief in u. To show the if part, we need the following lemma. Lemma 4.8 (Rationality + primary belief in u → Primary belief in rationality). Consider Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min. If θi ∈ Θi expresses common full belief in rationality and primary belief in u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses common full belief in primary belief in rationality. Proof of the if part of Theorem 4.3. Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min and c∗ i ) = ui which expresses common full belief in caution, rationality, and primary belief in u. Consider ti(Ei(θ∗ i ) = ui and bi(ti(Ei(θ∗ i ), c∗ i is rational for ti(Ei(θ∗ i )). By Lemmas 4.3 and 4.8, ti(Ei(θ∗ i )) expresses common full belief in caution and primary belief in rationality. Hence c∗ i is permissible in Γ. (cid:3) i )). Since wi(θ∗ i ))) has the same distribution on j's choices at each level as βi(θ∗ i ∈ Ci rational for some θ∗ i with wi(θ∗ 20 Shuige Liu 4.6 Proof of Theorem 4.4 Lemma 4.9 (Assumption of rationality → every good choice is supported + prior assumption of u, every good choice is supported + prior assumption of u + rationality → assumption of rationality). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I and Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco. If ti ∈ Ti expresses common assumption of ratio- nality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses common assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. On the other hand, consider Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I correspond- ing to Min. If θi ∈ Θi expresses common full belief in rationality and common as- sumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses common assumption of rationality. Here we have to combine the two ways (i.e., complete information models to incomplete information ones and the other way around) into one lemma. The reason is that to prove Lemma 4.9, we cannot separate them as we did in the previous lemmas; we need to show two ways in the induction base as well as in the induction step. The details are left to Section 6. Proof of Theorem 4.4. (Only-if) Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I , Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I corresponding to Mco, an iteratively admissible choice c∗ i ∈ Ti expressing common full belief in caution and common assumption of rationality such that c∗ i is rational for t∗ i ) has the same distribution on j's choices at each level as bi(t∗ i . Also, it follows from Observation 4.2 and Lemmas 4.1 and 4.9 that θ∗ i expresses common full belief in caution, rationality, and common assumption of prior u and that a good choice is supported. i ). By definition, wi(θ∗ i is rational for θ∗ i ) = ui and βi(θ∗ i ∈ Ci, and t∗ i ). Hence c∗ i = θi1(t∗ i . Let θ∗ i with wi(θ∗ (If). Consider Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I corresponding to Min and c∗ i ∈ Ci rational for some θ∗ i ) = ui which expresses common full belief in caution, ratio- nality, and common assumption of prior u and that a good choice is supported. Con- sider ti(Ei(θ∗ i ))) has the same distribution on j's choices at each level as βi(θ∗ i )). By Lemmas 4.2 and 4.9, ti(Ei(θ∗ i )) expresses common full belief in caution and common assumption of rationality. Therefore, c∗ i is rational for ti(Ei(θ∗ i ) = ui and bi(ti(Ei(θ∗ i )). Since wi(θ∗ i is iteratively admissible. (cid:3) i ), c∗ 5 Concluding Remarks 5.1 Faithful parallel to Perea and Roy (2017)'s Theorem 6.1 All theorems here can be rephrased as faithful parallels to Perea and Roy (2017)'s Theorem 6.1, focusing on equivalence between belief hierarchies in complete and incomplete information models. We adopt the forms here because the coincidence of belief hierarchies holds by construction, and we think it is unnecessary to mention it independently. Also, our proofs are based on constructing a specific correspondence between two models. It can be seen that this correspondence can be translated directly into prob- abilistic models and be used to show Perea and Roy (2017)'s Theorem 6.1. Further, Characterization by Incomplete Information 21 it can be seen that, by using our Lemma 3.1, belief in rationality under closest utility function in Perea and Roy (2017) can be replaced by the weaker one (Definition 3.4 (4.2)) here. 5.2 Extending to n-person cases Both Perea and Roy (2017) and this paper focus on 2-person games. To extend those results to n-person cases, the problem is how to define the distance between utility functions and how to relate the distance with the locations of choice-type pairs. In a 2-person game, a type of i only needs to consider distributions on ∆(C j × Θj). Hence a "cell" in βi(θi) is just a pair (c j,θj), and its location in βi(θi) can be related directly to the distance d(w j(θj), u j). In contrast, in an n-person case a "cell" of a lexicographic belief contains n − 1 pairs such as h(c1,θ1), ..., (ci−1,θi−1), (ci+1,θi+1), ..., (cn,θn)i , and consequently there are n − 1 distances, i.e., d(w1(θ1), u1), ..., d(wi−1(θi−1), ui−1), d(wi+1(θi+1), ui+1), ..., d(wn(θn), un). Then the problem is how to connect the location of this cell and those distances. We believe that the results of Perea and Roy (2017) and this paper can be extended to n- person games with a proper definition of the distances and their relation with locations of "cells" in lexicographic beliefs. Further work is expected in that direction. 5.3 The role of rationality Rationality has not been used in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 even though in epistemic mod- els with incomplete information constructed in Section 4.3 each type has a common full belief in rationality (Observation 4.2). On the other hand, there are also epistemic models with types satisfying all conditions in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 but not believing in rationality. Here is an example. Example 5.1 (Rationality is not satisfied). Consider the game Γ in Example 4.1 and the lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for the corresponding game form where Θ1 = {θ11,θ12,θ13}, Θ2 = {θ21,θ22,θ23}, and w1(θ11) = u1, β1(θ11) = ((D,θ21), (F,θ22), (E,θ23)), w1(θ12) = v1, β1(θ12) = ((D,θ21), (F,θ22), (E,θ23)), w1(θ13) = v′ 1, β1(θ13) = ((D,θ21), (F,θ22), (E,θ23)), w2(θ21) = v2, β2(θ21) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)), w2(θ22) = v′ 2, β2(θ22) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)), w2(θ23) = v′′ 2, β2(θ23) = ((C,θ11), (B,θ12)), (A,θ13)). where v1, v′ 2 is illustrated in Table 11. 1, v2, v′ 2 are the same as in Example 4.1 and v′′ 22 Shuige Liu Table 11 An alternative utility function for player 2 v′′ 2 A B C D 3 3 6 E 2 2 4 F 1 1 5 It can be seen that θ11 expresses common full belief in caution, u-centered belief and that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u (therefore primary belief in utilities nearest to u and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u are also satisfied) but not rationality since, for example, D is not rational for θ21. However, consider the model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for Γ constructed from Min. Indeed, since E1 = {{θ11,θ12,θ13}} and E2 = {{θ21,θ22,θ23}}, by letting t1 = t1({θ11,θ12,θ13}) and t2 = t2({θ21,θ22,θ23}), we obtain Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for Γ where T1 = {t1}, T2 = {t2}, and b1(t1) = ((D,t2), (F,t2), (E,t2)), b2(t2) = ((C,t1), (B,t1), (A,t1)). It can be seen that t1 expresses caution and common full belief in respect of prefer- ences (therefore primary belief in rationality). Further, C is optimal for both θ11 and t1. On the other hand, rationality plays a critical role in the characterizations of the second group. It seems that whether or not using rationality in the characterization differentiates the two refinements of permissibility within the incomplete information framework, which corresponds to the fact that, in complete information models, there is no general relationship between respect of preferences and assumption of rational- ity (Perea, 2012). It would be interesting that any future research could confirm this statement or show that proper rationalizability can be characterized with rationality while iterated admissibility can be done without it. On the other hand, as shown in the construction in Section 4.3, it is always possi- ble to construct epistemic models with incomplete information which satisfies ratio- nality as well as all conditions in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2. Further, prior belief in u is a condition between primary belief in u and u-centered belief. Those seem correspond to the fact within the complete information framework that there is always possible to construct belief hierarchy which both assumes the opponent's rationality and respects the opponent's preferences (Perea, 2012). 5.4 An ordinal distance on Vi In this note, we use the Euclidean distance to measure similarity between utility func- tions. As mentioned in Section 3.1, the Euclidean distance is cardinal. We can de- fine an ordinal distance as follows to replace it. Let βi be a lexicographic belief on ∆(S j ×Θj). For each vi, ui ∈ Vi, define dβi(vi, ui) = {{si, s′ i ∈ Si and the pref- erence between si and s′ i under βi at vi are different from that at ui}. It can be seen that dβi is a variation of Hamming distance (Hamming, 1950). It measures similarity between preferences under βi represented by vi and that by ui, i.e., it measures the i} : si, s′ Characterization by Incomplete Information 23 ordinal difference between vi and ui. This does not belong to the group of distances characterized in Section 3.3 of Perea and Roy (2017) since there is no norm on Vi to support dβi. Lemma 3.1 still holds under dβi since even if we replace d by dβi in Lemma 3.1 (c), the constructed utility function sequence in the proof still satis- fies it. Hence d in Definition 3.4 can be replaced by dβi with appropriate βi and the characterization results still hold. Also, by replacing rationality under closest utility function by our Definition 3.4 (4.2), Perea and Roy (2017)'s Theorem 6.1 still holds under dβi. 5.5 Weakening caution in Theorems 4.3 and 4.4 Caution in Theorems 4.3 and 4.4 can be replaced by a weaker concept called "weak caution" which is defined as follows. Definition 5.1 (Weak caution). Consider a game form G = (Ci)i∈I and a lexico- graphic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I for G with incomplete information. θi ∈ Θi is weakly cautious iff for each c j ∈ C j, there is some θj ∈ Θj such that θi deems (c j,θj) possible. Definition 5.1 is weaker than Definition 3.2 since it only requires that each choice should appear in the belief of θi but does not require that it should be paired with each belief of j deemed possible by θi. Nevertheless, we will show in Lemma 5.1 that in with other conditions in this characterization it leads to caution. Proposition 5.1 (An alternative characterization of permissibility). Consider a finite 2-person static game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I, the corresponding game form G = (Ci)i∈I , and a finite lexicographic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for Γ. Then, c∗ i ∈ Ci is permissible in Mco if and only if there is some finite lexicographic epistemic model Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I with incomplete information for G and some θ∗ i ∈ Θi with wi(θ∗ (a) c∗ (b) θ∗ in u. i is rational for θ∗ i expresses common full belief in weak caution, rationality, and primary belief i ) = ui such that i , and, The only-if part holds since weak caution is weaker than caution. The if part needs first to show that weak caution is enough for the characterization. Here, we show that the corresponding concept in complete information model can replace caution and characterize permissibility. Then we can use the mapping between complete and in- complete information models constructed in Section 4.3. Let Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I be a lexicographic model for Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I with complete information. ti ∈ Ti is weakly cautious iff for each c j ∈ C j, there is some t j ∈ Tj such that ti deems (c j,t j) possible. We have the following lemma. Lemma 5.1 (Characterizing permissibility by weak caution). Consider a lexico- graphic epistemic model Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I for a game Γ = (Ci, ui)i∈I . c∗ i ∈ Ci is per- missible if and only if it is rational to some t∗ i ∈ Ti which expresses common full belief in weak caution and primary belief in rationality. Also, we need the following lemmas. 24 Shuige Liu Lemma 5.2 (Weak cautionin → weak cautionco). Let Min = (Θi, wi,βi)i∈I and Mco = (Ti, bi)i∈I be constructed from Min by the above approach. If θi ∈ Θi expresses com- mon full belief in weak caution, so does ti(Ei(θi)). We omit the proof of Lemma 5.2 since it can be shown in a similar way as Lemma 4.3. It can be seen that Proposition 5.1 follows directly from Lemmas 5.1 and 5.1 and Theorem 4.3. Similarly, it can be seen that caution in Theorem 4.4 can be replaced by weak caution. However, it should be noted that caution cannot be weakened in Theorems 4.1 and 4.2. For Theorem 4.1, caution plays an important role in the proof of the if part; without it, primary belief in utilities nearest to u and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u cannot imply primary belief in rationality. For Theorem 4.2, the interpolation method used in the proof of Lemma 5.1 does not work in general since different types may have different orders there. 6 Proofs Proof of Lemma 3.1. We construct a sequence satisfying (a)-(c) by induction. First, let vi1 = ui. Suppose that for some ℓ ∈ {1, ..., L − 1} we have defined vi1, ..., viℓ sat- isfying (a)-(c). Now we show how to define vi,ℓ+1. It can be seen that there ex- ists Mℓ+1 > 0 such that viℓ(ci,ℓ+1,βi1) + Mℓ+1 > viℓ(ciℓ,βi1) for all ciℓ ∈ Ciℓ and ci,ℓ+1 ∈ Ci,ℓ+1. We define vi,ℓ+1 as follows: for each (ci, c j) ∈ C, vi,ℓ+1(ci, c j) =(cid:26) viℓ(ci, c j) + Mℓ+1 if ci ∈ Ci,ℓ+1 and c j ∈ suppβi1 viℓ(ci, c j) otherwise ℓ+1 ×Ci,ℓ+1×suppβi1)1/2 > 0, d(vi,ℓ+1, ui) = d(vi,ℓ+1, viℓ)+ d(vin, ui) > It can be seen that each ci,ℓ+1 ∈ Ci,ℓ+1 is rational at vi,ℓ+1 under βi. Also, since d(vi,ℓ+1, viℓ) = (M2 d(vin, ui). By induction, we can obtain a sequence vi1, ..., viL ∈ Vi satisfying (a)-(c). (cid:3) It should be noted that, given ui and βi, the sequence vi1, ..., viL satisfying (a)- (c) is not unique. The basic idea behind this inductive construction is depicted as follows. Suppose that ui(ci1,βi) > ui(ci2,βi) > ... > ui(ciN,βi), that is, Πi(βi) = ({ci1}, {ci2}, ..., {ciN}), then (ci2, ci1, ci3, ..., ciN, ) vi3−→ (ci1, ci2, ci3, ..., ciN) vi2−→ Informally speaking, we take equivalent classes of choices one by one to the fore- most location of the sequence according to the order of preference in ui under βi. The following example shows how this construction works. (ci3, ci2, ci1..., ciN) ... viN−→ (ciN, ci,N−1, ..., ci1) Example 6.1. Consider u1 in Example 2.1. Under the lexicographic belief β1 = (D, E, F), A is preferred to B and B is preferred to C in u1, that is, Π1(β1) = ({A}, {B}, {C}). We can define v11, v12, and v13 as in Table 12. At v11, the order of preferences is (A, B,C) under β1, at v12 it is (B, A,C), and at v13 it is (C, B, A). Proof of Lemma 4.1. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if ti is cautious, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) is also cautious. Let c j ∈ C j and θj ∈ Θj(θi). Characterization by Incomplete Information 25 Table 12 Alternative utility functions for players 1 corresponding to Π1(β1) v11 = u1 A B C D 1 1 1 E 1 1 0 F 1 0 1 −→ v12 A B C D 1 2 1 E 1 1 0 F 1 0 1 −→ v13 A B C D 1 2 3 E 1 1 0 F 1 0 1 By construction, it can be seen that the type t j ∈ Tj satisfying the condition that θj ∈ Θj(t j) is in Tj(ti). Since ti is cautious, ti deems (c j,t j) possible. Consider the pair (c j,θ′ j are in Θj(t j), j) in βi(θi) corresponding to (c j,t j). Since both θj and θ′ w j (θ′ j) j). Hence (c j,θ j ) is deemed it follows from Observation 4.1 that βj(θj) = βj(θ′ possible by θi. Here we have shown that θi is cautious. Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if ti expresses n-fold full belief in caution then so does each θi ∈ Θi(ti). Now suppose that ti expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in caution, i.e., each t j ∈ Tj(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in caution. By construction, for each θi ∈ Θi(ti) and each θj ∈ Θj(θi) there is some t j ∈ Tj(ti) such that θj ∈ Θj(ti), and, by inductive assumption, each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in caution. Therefore, each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in caution. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.2. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if ti primarily believes in j's rationality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) primarily believes in utilities nearest to u. Let (c j,θj) be a pair deemed possible in the level-1 belief of θi. Consider its correspondence (c j,t j) in level-1 belief of ti. Since ti primarily believes in j's rationality, c j is rational for t j. It follows that c j ∈ C j1 ∈ Πj(t j). By Lemma 2.1 and construction, it follows that w j(θj) = u j. Since u j is the nearest function to itself among all utility functions in Vj, we have shown that θi primarily believes in utilities nearest to u. Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if ti expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in pri- mary belief in utilities nearest to u. Now suppose that ti expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality, i.e., each t j ∈ Tj(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. Since, by construction, for each θi ∈ Θi(ti) and each θj ∈ Θj(θi) there is some t j ∈ Tj(ti) such that θj ∈ Θj(t j), it follows that, by inductive assumption, each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in utilities nearest to u. Therefore, each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in primary belief in utilities nearest to u. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.3. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if θi is cautious, then ti(Ei(θi)) is also cautious. Let c j ∈ C j and t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))). By construction, t j = t j(E j) for some E j ∈ E j, and there is some θj ∈ E j which is deemed possible by θi. Since θi is cautious, there is some θ′ j) = βj(θj), i.e., θ′ j ∈ E j, such that (c j,θ′ j) is deemed possible by θi. By construction, (c j,t j) is deemed possible by ti(Ei(θi)). j with βj(θ′ Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if θi expresses n-fold full belief in caution then so does ti(Ei(θi)). Now suppose that θi expresses (n + 1)-fold full be- 26 Shuige Liu lief in caution, i.e., each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in caution. Since, by construction, for each t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))), there is some θj ∈ Θj(θi) such that t j = t j(E j(θj)), by inductive assumption t j expresses n-fold full belief in caution. Therefore, ti(Ei(θi)) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in caution. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.4. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if θi is cautious, primarily believes in utilities nearest to u, and believes in that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) primarily believes in j's rational- ity. Let (c j,t j) be a choice-type pair which is deemed possible in ti(Ei(θi))'s level-1 belief. By construction t j = t j(E j) for some E j ∈ E j, and for some θj ∈ E j, (c j,θj) is deemed possible in θi's level-1 belief. Since θi primarily believes in utilities nearest to u, it follows that j), u j) for all θ′ d(w j(θj), u j) ≤ d(w j(θ′ Suppose that c j is not optimal for t j. Let c′ j be a choice optimal to t j. Since θi is v j v j j ) is deemed possible by θi. Then j ∈ E j such that (c j,θ cautious, there is some θ since θi believes in that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u, it follows v j j ), u j) < d(w j(θj), u j), which is contradictory to (1). There- that d(v j, u j) = d(w j(θ fore c j is optimal for t j. Here we have shown that ti(Ei(θi)) primarily believes in j's rationality. j ∈ E j. (1) Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if θi expresses n-fold full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses n-fold belief in primary belief in rationality. Now suppose that θi expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u, i.e., each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in caution, primary belief in utilities nearest to u, and that a best choice is supported by utilities nearest to u. Since, by construction, for each t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))), there is some θj ∈ Θj(θi) such that t j = t j(E j(θj)), by inductive assumption t j expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. Therefore, ti(Ei(θi)) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.5. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if ti is caution and respects j's preferences, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses u-centered belief. It can be seen that if ti is cautious and respects j's preferences, then we can combine all types deemed possible by ti with the same belief into one type without hurting the caution and respect of j's preference, and every choice optimal for ti is still optimal for this new type and vice versa. Therefore, without loss of generality we can assume that for each t j,t′ j ∈ Vj v j j ) and (c′ j ∈ C j, θj ∈Θj, and v j, v′ j ∈ Tj, b j(t j) 6= b j(t′ v′ j ) are deemed possible by θi with d(v j, u j) < d(v′ j j,θ j, u j). v′ v j j j ,θ j ∈ Since each type in Ti has a distinct lexicographic belief, it follows that θ Θj(t j) for some t j ∈ Tj. By construction it follows that (1) ti deems both (c j,t j) and (c′ j,t j) possible, and (2) u j(c j,ti) > u j(c′ j,ti). Since ti respects j's preferences, ti deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j,t j), which corresponds to that θi deems v′ j j ). Here we have shown that θi expresses j,θ v j j ) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). Let c j, c′ such that (c j,θ (c j,θ u-centered belief. Characterization by Incomplete Information 27 Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if ti expresses n-fold full belief in respect of preferences then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in u-centered belief. Now suppose that ti expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in respect of preferences, i.e., each t j ∈ Tj(ti) expresses n-fold full belief respect of preferences. Since, by con- struction, for each θi ∈ Θi(ti) and each θj ∈ Θj(θi) there is some t j ∈ Tj(ti) such that θj ∈ Θj(t j), by inductive assumption it follows that each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in u-centered belief. Therefore, each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in u-centered belief. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.6. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if θi is cautious, has a u-centered belief, and believes that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) respects j's preferences. First, since θi is cautious, By Lemma 4.3, ti(Ei(θi)) is also cautious. Let c j, c′ j ∈ C j and t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))) with t j prefers c j to c′ j. By construction t j = t j(E j) for some E j ∈ E j, and, since θi is cautious, there are θj,θ′ j) possible. Since βj(θj) = βj(θ′ j) and θj has the same probability distribution over Ci at each level as t j, it follows that u j(c j,θj) > u j(c′ j,θj). Since θi believes that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u, it follows that d(w j(θj), u j) < d(w j(θ′ j), u j). Since θi has a u-centered belief, it follows that θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than (c′ j,t j). Therefore, ti(Ei(θi)) respects j's preferences. j), which implies that ti(Ei(θi)) deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j,θ′ j ∈ E j such that θi deems (c j,θj) and (c′ j,θ′ Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if θi expresses n-fold full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses n-fold full belief in respect of preferences. Now suppose that θi expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by utilities nearer to u, i.e., each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in caution, u-centered belief, and that a better choice is supported by util- ities nearer to u. Since, by construction, for each t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))), there is some θj ∈ Θj(θi) such that t j = t j(E j(θj)), by inductive assumption t j expresses n-fold full belief in respect of preferences. Therefore, ti(Ei(θi)) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in respect of preferences. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.7. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if ti primarily believes in j's rationality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) primarily believes in u. Let (c j,θj) be a pair deemed possible in the level-1 belief of θi. Consider its corre- sponding (c j,t j) in level-1 belief of ti. Since ti primarily believes in j's rationality, c j is rational for t j. It follows that c j ∈ C j1 ∈ Πj(t j). By construction, it follows that w j(θj) = u j. Here we have shown that θi primarily believes in u. Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if ti expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in pri- mary belief in u. Now suppose that ti expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality, i.e., each t j ∈ Tj(ti) expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. Since, by construction, for each θi ∈Θi(ti) and each θj ∈ Θj(θi) there is some t j ∈ Tj(ti) such that θj ∈ Θj(t j), it follows that, by inductive assumption, each θj ∈ Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. Therefore, each θi ∈ Θi(ti) expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in primary belief in u. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.8. We show this statement by induction. First we show that if θi 28 Shuige Liu believes in j's rationality and primarily believes in u, then ti(Ei(θi)) primarily be- lieves in j's rationality. Let (c j,t j) be a choice-type pair which is deemed possible in ti(Ei(θi))'s level-1 belief. By construction t j = t j(E j) for some E j ∈ E j, and for some θj ∈ E j, (c j,θj) is deemed possible in θi's level-1 belief. Since θi primarily believes in u, it follows that w j(θj) = u j. Also, since θi believes j's rationality, it follows that c j is rational at u j under βj(θj), i.e., bi(t j). Therefore c j is rational for t j. Here we have shown that ti(Ei(θi)) primarily believes in j's rationality. Suppose we have shown that, for each i ∈ I, if θi expresses n-fold full belief in ra- tionality and primary belief in u, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses n-fold belief in primary be- lief in rationality. Now suppose that θi expresses (n + 1)-fold full belief in rationality and primary belief in u, i.e., each θj ∈Θj(θi) expresses n-fold full belief in rationality and primary belief in u. Since, by construction, for each t j ∈ Tj(ti(Ei(θi))), there is some θj ∈ Θj(θi) such that t j = t j(E j(θj)), by inductive assumption t j expresses n- fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. Therefore, ti(Ei(θi)) expresses (n + 1)- fold full belief in primary belief in rationality. (cid:3) Proof of Lemma 4.9. We show this statement by induction. Let θi ∈ Θi(ti). First we show that if ti assumes in j's rationality, θi prior assumes u and assumes that every good choice is supported. Let c j ∈ C j be optimal for some cautious type of j whose assigned utility function is u j within an epistemic model with incomplete information. It is easy to see that c j is optimal for its corresponding type, which is also cautious by Lemma 4.2, in any complete information model constructed from the one with incomplete information. Since ti assumes j's rationality, ti deems pos- sible a cautious type t j for which c j is optimal. By construction, some θj ∈ Θj(t j) is deemed possible by θi. Since ti is cautious, (c j,t j) is deemed possible by ti, and, by construction (c j,θj1(t j)) is deemed possible by θi. Since w j(θj1(t j)) = u j and c j is optimal for θj1(t j), it follows that θi assumes that every good choice is supported. j) a pair which does not satisfy that condition. Let (c j,t j) and (c′ Let (c j,θj) with θj cautious deemed possible by θi satisfying w j(θj) = u j and j,θ′ j) be the pairs j). Since c j is rational j is not j. Since ti assumes j's rationality, ti deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely j). (c′ occurring in the belief of ti corresponding to (c j,θj) and (c′ to θj and w j(θj) = u j, it follows that c j is optimal for t j. On the other hand, c′ optimal for t′ than (c′ Here we have shown that θi prior assumes u. j,θ′ j,t′ j,t′ j). By construction, θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than (c′ j,θ′ Now we show the other direction: suppose that if θi ∈ Θi prior assumes u and assumes that every good choice is supported, we prove that ti(Ei(θi)) assumes j's rationality. Suppose that c j is optimal for some cautious type within some epistemic model with complete information. It can be seen by construction that c j is optimal for some cautious type with ui as its assigned utility function within some epistemic model with incomplete information which corresponds to that complete information model. Since θi believes in that every good choice is supported, θi deems possible a cautious type θj such that w j(θj) = u j and c j is optimal for θj. By construction it follows that ti(Ei(θi)) deems t j(E j(θj)) possible for which c j is optimal. Let (c j,t j) with t j cautious be a pair which is deemed possible by ti(Ei(θi)) sat- isfying that c j is optimal for t j, and (c′ j) be a pair deemed possible by ti(Ei(θi)) which does not satisfy that condition. Since θi assumes that every good choice is j,t′ Characterization by Incomplete Information 29 supported, there is some θj ∈ Θj(θi) corresponding to t j with w j(θj) = u j such that (c j,θj) is deemed possible by θi. On the other hand, since θi believes in rationality, for each θ′ j) 6= u j. Since θi prior assumes u, θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). It follows that ti(Ei(θi)) deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). Here we have shown that ti(Ei(θi)) assumes j's rationality. j) is deemed possible by θi, it holds that w j(θ′ j such that (c′ j,θ′ j,θ′ j,t′ Suppose that, for some n ∈ N, we have shown that for each k ≤ n, (n1) if ti ∈ Ti expresses k-fold assumption of rationality, then each θi ∈ Θi(ti) ex- presses k-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported; (n2) If θi ∈Θi expresses k-fold full belief of rationality and k-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported, then ti(Ei(θi)) expresses k-fold assumption of rationality. Now we show that these two statements hold for n + 1. First, suppose that ti ∈ Ti expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of rationality. Let c j ∈ C j be a choice of j opti- mal for some cautious type whose assigned utility function is u j that expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. Then it is easy to see that (1) by inductive assumption, in the constructed complete information model the corresponding type expresses n-fold assumption of rationality, and (2) c j is optimal for that type. Since ti expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of rationality, ti deems possible a cautious type t j that expresses up to n-fold assumption of rationality and for which c j is optimal. By construction, it follows that θi deems possible some θj ∈ Θj(t j). By inductive assumption it follows that each θj ∈ Θj(t j) expresses n-fold assumption of in that every good choice is supported. Since θi expresses common be- lief in caution and rationality it follows that θi deems (c j,θj1) for θj1 ∈ Θj(t j) (that is, w j(θj1) = u j). j,θ′ Let (c j,θj) with θj cautious deemed possible by θi satisfying that θj expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported and w j(θj) = u j and (c′ j) a pair which does not satisfy those conditions. Let (c j,t j) j,t′ and (c′ j) be the pairs occurring in the belief of ti corresponding to (c j,θj) and (c′ j,θ′ j). Since c j is rational θj with w j(θj) = u j, it follows that c j is optimal for t j. Also, by inductive assumption, it follows that t j expresses up to n-fold assumption of rationality. On the other hand, it can be seen that (c′ j) does not satisfy these con- ditions. Since ti expresses (n + 1)-fold of assumptions of rationality, ti deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). By construction, θi deems (c j,θj) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). Here we have shown that θi expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. j,θ′ j,t′ j,t′ Now suppose that θi ∈ Θi expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. Let c j ∈ C j be a choice of j optimal for some cautious type that expresses to n-fold assumption of rationality. By inductive assumption it follows that the corresponding type within some incomplete information model also expresses n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. It can be seen that c j is optimal to the constructed type having u j as its utility function and the type expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported. Then θi deems possible a type θj with w j(θj) = u j for player j which expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported 30 Shuige Liu for which c j is optimal. By inductive assumption it follows that ti(Ei(θi)) deems possible t j(E j(θj)) which expresses n-fold assumption of rationality and for which c j is optimal. Let (c j,t j) be a pair with t j cautious deemed possible by ti(Ei(θi)) where t j ex- presses up to n-fold assumption of rationality and c j is optimal for t j, and let (c′ j,t′ j) be a pair that does not satisfy this property. It can be seen that there is some θj cor- responding to t j such that θj is cautious and expresses up to n-fold assumption of prior u and that every good choice is supported and w j(θj) = u j,while (c′ j) does not satisfy this property for any θ′ j deemed possible by θi since θi expresses n-fold full belief of rationality. Therefore ti(Ei(θi)) deems (c j,t j) infinitely more likely than (c′ j). Here we have shown that ti(Ei(θi)) expresses (n + 1)-fold assumption of ra- tionality. (cid:3) j,θ′ j,t′ j ∈ Tj such that for some k ∈ {1, ..., K}, bik(c j,t′ Proof of Lemma 5.1. The only-if part holds automatically. To show the if part, we need first to show that each weak cautious type can be extended into a cautious one without changing the set of choices rational for it. It is done by an interpolation method as follows. Let ti be a type satisfying weak caution with bi(ti) = (bi1, ..., biK), c j ∈ C j, and t j ∈ Tj(ti). Suppose that (c j,t j) is not deemed possible by ti. Since ti is weakly cautious, there is some t′ j) > 0. Now we extend (bi1, ..., biK) into (b′ it = bit for each t ≤ k, (2) b′ i,k+1 is obtained by replacing every occurrence of (c j,t′ i,k+1 a doppel- ganger of bik. It can be seen that for each ci ∈ Ci, and a doppelganger b′ i,k+1 of bik, ui(ci, b′ i,k+1) = ui(ci, bik). By repeatedly interpolating doppelgangers into bi(ti) for each missed choice-type pairs, finally we obtain a lexicographic belief (b′ iK′ ) that satisfies caution. We use ti to denote the type with belief (b′ iK′). t i is called a cautious extension of ti. We have the following lemma. j) by (c j,t j) in the distribution of bik. We call b′ it = bi,t−1 for each t > k + 1, and (3) b′ i,K+1) by letting (1) b′ i1, ..., b′ i1, ..., b′ i1, ..., b′ iℓ) = ui(c′ i, b′ i1, ..., b′ Lemma 6.1 (Extended type preserves rational choices). Let ti be a weakly cautious type and t i a cautious extension of ti. Then ci ∈ Ci is rational for ti if and only if it is rational for t i. Proof. (Only-if) Suppose that ci is not rational for ti. Then there is some c′ which is preferred ci under bi(t i) = (b′ such that ui(ci, b′ bi,k+1 be the entry in bi(ti) such that b′ original bi(ti) = (bi1, ..., biK), ui(ci, biℓ) = ui(c′ ui(c′ i ∈ Ci iK′), that is, there is some k′ ∈ {0, ..., K′} i, bi,k′+1). Let i,k′+1 is its doppelganger. It follows that in the i, biℓ) for each ℓ ≤ k and ui(ci, bi,k+1) < iℓ) for each ℓ ≤ k′ and ui(ci, bi,k′+1) < ui(c′ i, bi,k+1). Hence ci is not rational for ti. (If) Suppose that ci is not rational for ti. Then there is some c′ i ∈ Ci which is preferred ci under bi(ti) = (bi1, ..., biK), that is, there is some k ∈ {0, ..., K} such that ui(ci, biℓ) = ui(c′ i,k′+1 be the corresponding doppelganger in bi(t i) to bi,k+1. It follows that in the original ui(ci, b′ i, b′ i,k′+1). Hence ci is not rational for ti. (cid:3) i, biℓ) for each ℓ ≤ k and ui(ci, bi,k+1) < ui(c′ iℓ) for each ℓ ≤ k′ and ui(ci, b′ i, bi,k+1). Let b′ i,k′+1) < ui(c′ iℓ) = ui(c′ Proof of Lemma 5.1 (Continued) Since caution implies weak caution, the only-if part holds automatically. For the if part, suppose that c∗ i ∈ Ti which expresses common full belief in weak caution and primary belief in rational- i is rational for some t∗ i, b′ Characterization by Incomplete Information 31 ity. Consider an epistemic model (T i, bi)i∈I such that for each i ∈ I, T i = {t i : ti ∈ Ti} and bi(ti) is a cautious extension of bi(ti) with replacing each occurrence of t j by t j. By Lemma 6.1, since c∗ i . Also, it can be seen by construction that t∗ i expresses common full belief in caution. Also, since the interpolation always put doppelgangers after the original one, it does not change the level-1 belief, and consequently t∗ i expresses common full belief in primary belief in rationality. Therefore, c∗ i , it is also rational for t∗ i is rational for t∗ i is permissible. (cid:3) References 1. Asheim GB (2001) Proper rationalizability in lexicographic beliefs. Int J Game Theory 30:453-478. 2. Battigalli P (2003) Rationalizability in infinite, dynamic games of incomplete information. Res Econ 57:1-38. 3. Battigalli P, Siniscalchi M (2003) Rationalization and incomplete information. BE J Theor Econ 61:165-184. 4. Battigalli P, Siniscalchi M (2007) Interactive epistemology in games with payoff uncertainty. Res Econ 3:1534-5963. 5. Bernheim D (1984) Rationalizable strategic behavior. Econometrica 52:1007-1028. 6. Blume L, Brandenburger A, Dekel E (1991a) Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59:61-79. 7. Blume L, Brandenburger A, Dekel E (1991b) Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica 59:81-98. 8. Boge W, Eisele T (1979) On solutions of Bayesian games. Int J Game Theory 8:193-215. 9. Borgers T (1994) Weak dominance and approximate common knowledge. J Econ Theory 64:265-276. 10. Borgers T, Samuelson L (1992) "Cautious" utility maximization and iterated weak dominance. Int J Game Theory 21:13-25. 11. Brandenburger A (1992) Lexicographic probabilities and iterated admissibility. In Dasgupta J et al. (ed) Economic Analysis of Markets and Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 282-290. 12. Brandenburger A, Friedenberge A, Keisler J (2008) Admissibility in games. Econometrica 76:307- 352. 13. Dekel E, Fudenberg D (1990) Rational behavior with payoff uncertainty. J Econ Theory 52:243-267. 14. Dekel E, Siniscalchi M (2015) Epistemic game theory. In Young PH, Zamir S (ed) Handbooks of Game Theory with Economic Applications Vol.4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 619-702. 15. Hamming RW (1950) Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell Syst Tech J 29: 147-160. 16. Heifetz A, Samet D (1998) Topology-free typology of beliefs. J Econ Theory 82:324-341. 17. Myerson, RB (1978) Refinements of Nash equilibrium concept. Int J Game Theory 7:73-80. 18. Pearce D (1984) Rational strategic behavior and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52:1029- 1050. 19. Perea A (2012) Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge. 20. Perea A, Kets W (2016) When do types induce the same belief hierarchy? Games 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/g7040028. 21. Perea A, Roy S (2017) A new epistemic characterization of ε-proper rationalizability. Games Econ Behav 104:309-328. 22. Samuelson L (1992) Dominated strategies and common knowledge. Games Econ Behav 4:284-313. 23. Schuhmacher F (1999) Proper rationalizability and backward induction. Int J Game Theory 28:599- 615. 24. Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4:25-55.
1910.07022	1	1910	2019-10-15T19:46:54	Measuring the Completeness of Theories	[ "econ.TH", "cs.GT", "cs.LG" ]	We use machine learning to provide a tractable measure of the amount of predictable variation in the data that a theory captures, which we call its "completeness." We apply this measure to three problems: assigning certain equivalents to lotteries, initial play in games, and human generation of random sequences. We discover considerable variation in the completeness of existing models, which sheds light on whether to focus on developing better models with the same features or instead to look for new features that will improve predictions. We also illustrate how and why completeness varies with the experiments considered, which highlights the role played in choosing which experiments to run.	econ.TH	econ	Measuring the Completeness of Theories∗ Drew Fudenberg† Jon Kleinberg‡ Annie Liang§ Sendhil Mullainathan¶ October 17, 2019 Abstract We use machine learning to provide a tractable measure of the amount of predictable variation in the data that a theory captures, which we call its "completeness." We apply this measure to three problems: assigning certain equivalents to lotteries, initial play in games, and human generation of random sequences. We discover considerable variation in the completeness of existing models, which sheds light on whether to focus on developing better models with the same features or instead to look for new features that will improve predic- tions. We also illustrate how and why completeness varies with the experiments considered, which highlights the role played in choosing which experiments to run. Suppose we have a theory of the labor market that says that a person's wages depend on their knowledge and capabilities. We can test this theory by looking at whether more education indeed predicts higher wages in labor data. If it does, this would provide evidence in support of the theory, but it would not tell us whether an alternative theory might be even more predictive. The question of whether there are ∗This is an updated version of "The Theory is Predictive, but is it Complete?" We thank Alberto Abadie, Amy Finkelstein, and Johan Ugander for helpful comments. We are also grateful to Adrian Bruhin, Helga Fehr-Duda, Thomas Epper, Kevin Leyton-Brown, and James Wright for sharing data with us. †Department of Economics, MIT ‡Department of Computer Science, Cornell University §Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania ¶Department of Economics, University of Chicago 1 more predictive theories, and if so how much more predictive they might be, raises the issue of completeness: How close is the performance of a given theory to the best performance that is achievable in the domain? In other words, how much of the predictable variation in the data is captured by the theory? We cannot gauge completeness of a theory solely through the level of its predictive accuracy because there is intrinsic noise in the outcome. For example, an accuracy of 55% is strikingly successful for predicting a (discretized) stock movement based on past returns, but extremely weak for predicting the (discretized) movement of Earth based on the masses and positions of the sun and all of the other planets. These two problems differ in the best achievable prediction performance they permit, and so the same quantitative level of predictive accuracy must be interpreted differently in the two domains. One way to view the contrast between these two problem domains is as follows. In each case, an instance i of the prediction problem consists of a vector xi of measured features or covariates, and a hidden outcome yi that must be predicted. In the case of astronomical bodies, we believe that the measured features are sufficient to make highly accurate predictions over short time scales. In the case of stock prices, the measured features -- past prices and returns -- are only a small fraction of the information that we believe may be relevant to future prices. Thus, the variation in stock movements conditioned on the features we know is large, while planetary motions are well-predicted by known features. The point then is that prediction error represents a composite of two things: first, the opportunity for a more predictive model; and second, intrinsic noise in the problem due to the limitations of the feature set. If we want to understand how much room there is for improving the predictive performance of existing theories within a given domain -- holding constant the set of features that we know how to measure -- we need a way to separate these two effects. We propose that a good way to distinguish between these sources of prediction error is to compare the performance of the existing models with the best achievable level of prediction for our feature set, as computed by a Table Lookup algorithm. This algorithm finds the best prediction for each feature vector, assuming that the distribution of training instances approximates the actual relationship between the observable features and the outcome. With an ideal (i.e. infinite) data set, Table 2 Lookup minimizes the expected out-of-sample error, but Table Lookup can be quite imperfect when data is sparse. Appendix A provides remarks that justify the use of the performance of Table Lookup as an approximation to the best achievable accuracy in our applications. We illustrate the usefulness of Table Lookup by applying it to three different problem domains: the evaluation of risk, initial play in games, and human perception of randomness. These are all are important topics in economics, with a long line of established models. We use our benchmark to evaluate the completeness of leading models from each domain. Interestingly, we find that the best model we use for the perception of randomness is only 24% complete, while Cumulative Prospect Theory is 95% complete despite having a mean-squared prediction error of 67.38. This, and the subsequent observations we make in Sections 2.1-2.3, are informative about the problem domains and the status of their associated models. Our main contribution, however, is methodological: since most economic behav- iors cannot be perfectly predicted given the available features, the predictive accura- cies of our models are difficult to interpret on their own. Understanding not just how well existing models predict, but also how complete they are, is important for guiding the development of the theory. In the three applications in this paper, we show how these benchmarks can be constructed, and that they reveal non-obvious insights into the performance of our existing models. We also illustrate how and why our our completeness measure varies with the experiments considered, for example with the choice of lotteries used to evaluate risk preferences. This dependence highlights the key role played in choosing which experiments to run. The Table Lookup benchmark is applicable to domains beyond the three that we describe here, but not in all of them, and we discuss various limitations to its applicability and interpretation throughout the paper. First, as we explain in Section 1.3, Table Lookup approximates the best achievable predictive accuracy only when the data set is large relative to the number of unique feature vectors. This requires either that features are discrete-valued (as in our application in Section 2.3), or that the available data involves observations from a finite number of unique instances (as in our two applications in Sections 2.1 and 2.2). Although Table Lookup is not feasible for all problems, the range of applications in the paper suggest that Table Lookup is more effective than one might initially suspect. 3 Second, our completeness measure depends on a specified set of features, and is evaluated on a given data set. If we change either the underlying feature set or the data, we would expect the measurement of completeness to also change, as we discuss in Section 3.2. The dependence of completeness on what data set we use is important to keep in mind. Moreover, as we show in Sections 2.2, the way the completeness of a model varies across data sets can shed light on the domains in which the model performs well or performs poorly. 1 Problem and Approach 1.1 Prediction Problems In a prediction problem, there is an outcome Y whose realization is of interest, and features X1, . . . , XN that are statistically related to the outcome. The goal is to predict the outcome given the observed features. Some examples include predicting an individual's future wage based on childhood covariates (city of birth, family income, quality of education, etc.), or predicting a criminal defendant's flight risk based on their past record and properties of the crime (Kleinberg et al., 2017). We focus here on three prediction problems that emerge from experimental economics: Example 1 (Risk Preferences). Can we predict the valuations that people assign to various money lotteries? Example 2 (Predicting Play in Games). Can we predict how people will play the first time they encounter a given simultaneous-move game? Example 3 (Human Generation of Random Sequences). Given a target random pro- cess -- for example, a Bernoulli random sequence -- can we predict the errors that a human makes while mimicking this process? Formally, suppose that the observable features belong to some space X = X1 × ···×XN and the outcome belongs to Y. A map f : X → Y from features to outcomes is a (point) prediction rule.1 Many economic models can be described as a parametric family of prediction rules F = (fθ)θ∈Θ. For example, if our model class F imposes a 1Note that a prediction of a probability distribution over Y can be cast as the prediction of a point in the space Y (cid:48) = ∆(Y) of distributions on Y. 4 linear relationship between the outcome and a set of features, then the parameter θ would define a vector of weights applied to each of the features. In the application we study in Section 2.1, the expected utility class F describes a family of utility functions u(z) = zθ over dollar amounts, and the parameter θ reflects the degree of risk aversion. 1.2 Accuracy and Completeness We suppose that our prediction problem comes with a a loss function, (cid:96) : Y ×Y → R, where (cid:96)(y(cid:48), y) is the error assigned to prediction of y(cid:48) when the realized outcome is y. The commonly used loss functions mean-squared error and classification loss correspond to (cid:96)(y(cid:48), y) = (y(cid:48) − y)2 and (cid:96)(y(cid:48), y) = 1(y(cid:48) (cid:54)= y) respectively. Definition. The expected error (or risk) of prediction rule f on a new observation (x, y) generated according to the joint distribution P is2 EP(f ) = EP [(cid:96)(f (x), y)]. The prediction rule in the class F that minimizes the expected prediction error is the one associated with the parameter value θ∗ P = arg min θ∈Θ EP(fθ). The expected error of this "best" rule in F is EP(fθ∗ ). In Section 1.3.1, we discuss how to estimate EP(fθ∗ ) on finite data; here we discuss how to interpret it. To understand a model's error, it is helpful to distinguish between two very different error sources. First, if the the conditional distribution Y X is not degenerate, then even the P P ideal prediction rule does not predict perfectly. f∗ P (x) = arg min y(cid:48)∈Y EP [(cid:96)(y(cid:48), y) x] 2Different loss functions are typically used when predicting distributions, see e.g. Gneiting and Raftery (2007). 5 Definition. The irreducible error in the prediction problem is the expected error EP(f∗ P ) = EP [(cid:96)(f∗ P (x), y)] (1) of the ideal rule on a new test observation. The irreducible error is an upper bound on how well we can predict Y using the features X. A different source of prediction error is the specification of which prediction rules f : X → Y are in the class F. Typically the best possible model will not be an element of F -- that is, most sets of models are at least slightly misspecified. If F leaves out an important regularity in the data, there may be exist models outside of F that give much better predictions on this domain.3 These two sources of prediction error have very different implications for how to improve prediction in the domain. If the achieved performance of the model is sub- stantially lower than the best feasible performance, then it may be possible to achieve large improvements without seeking additional inputs, for example by identifying new regularities in behavior. On the other hand, if the achieved prediction error is close to the best achievable level of prediction for our feature set, then only marginal gains are feasible from identification of new structure. This encourages consideration of prediction rules f : X (cid:48) → Y based on some larger feature space X (cid:48). We propose the ratio of reduction in prediction error achieved by the model, compared to the achievable reduction, as a measure of how close the model comes to the best achievable performance. We call this ratio the the model's completeness. To operationalize this measure, let fnaive : X → Y be a naive rule suited to the prediction problem; this rule -- such as "predict uniformly at random" -- is meant to represent a lower bound on how bad predictions can be. Definition. The completeness for the model class F is EP(fnaive) − EP(fθ∗ ) EP(fnaive) − EP(f∗ P ) P . (2) 3On the other hand, expanding the model class risks overfitting, so more parsimonious model classes can lead to more accurate predictions when data is scarce (Hastie et al., 2009). As we discuss in Sections 1.3.2 and 1.4, all of the data sets we consider here are large relative to the number of features. 6 Note that the completeness measure depends on the underlying distribution P . We expect the conditional distribution P (y x) to be a fixed distribution describing the true dependence of the outcome on the features, but the marginal distribution over the feature space X is frequently a choice variable of the analyst -- e.g. which lotteries or games to run in an experiment. As we show in Section 2.2, when we change this marginal distribution, we obtain different measures of completeness for the same model. Ideally, we would like the chosen distribution over features to be the one that is most economically relevant, but in practice we may not know what that is. 1.3 Evaluating Completeness on Finite Data Neither the true joint distribution P over features and outcomes nor the derived quantities EP(fnaive), EP(fθ∗ P ) are directly observable, but they can be estimated from data. We describe below an approach (tenfold cross-validation) that is standard for estimating expected prediction errors, and describe an algorithm -- Table Lookup -- for approximating the ideal prediction rule f∗ P . ), and EP(f∗ P 1.3.1 Cross-Validated Prediction Errors To evaluate the predictive accuracy of a model class F on a finite data set, we first choose between prediction rules in F based on how well they predict a sample of training observations. Then we evaluate the trained rule on a new set of test obser- vations. Formally, for any integer n let Z n = (X × Y)n be the space corresponding to n observations of (x, y), and suppose the analyst has access to a data set Z ∈ Z n. Using the procedure of K-fold cross-validation, this data is randomly split into K equally- In each iteration 1 ≤ i ≤ K of the procedure, sized disjoint subsets Z1, . . . , ZK. the subset Zi is identified as the test data and the remaining subsets are used as training data. The i-th parameter estimate is the one that minimizes average loss when predicting the i-th training set: θ∗ i = arg min θ∈Θ 1 n (cid:96)(fθ(x), y). (cid:88) (x,y)∈∪j(cid:54)=iZj 7 (The naive model prediction rule does not depend on the training data, and is always fnaive.) The out-of-sample error of the estimated fθ∗ on the test set Zi is i (cid:88) (x,y)∈Zi K(cid:88) i=1 CVErri = 1 m (cid:96)(fθ∗ i (x), y). CVErr(Z) = 1 K CVErri (3) (4) If the data in Z are drawn i.i.d. from P , the average out-of-sample error is a consistent estimator for the expected error EP(fθ∗ ). The display in (4) is known as the K-fold cross-validated prediction error. In the main text, we will more simply refer to it as the prediction error of the model class F, understanding that it is a finite-data estimate. P Below we write CVnaive(Z) for the cross-validated prediction error for the naive rule fnaive and CVF (Z) for the cross-validated prediction error for the model class F. These are respectively our estimates for EP (fnaive) and E(fθ∗ ). P 1.3.2 Table Lookup Benchmark To estimate the expected error of the ideal rule EP(f∗ algorithm to each iteration i of cross-validation: Formally, let P ), we apply a Table Lookup (cid:88) f T L i = arg min f∈X Y 1 n (cid:96)(fθ(x), y) (x,y)∈∪j(cid:54)=iZj be the function that minimizes prediction error on the training data, where we search across the complete (unrestricted) class of mappings from X to Y. Then define the cross-validated Table Lookup error as in (3) and (4). This measure, which we will denote CVT L, is a consistent estimator for the irreducible error EP (f∗ P ). How good of an approximation it is depends on a comparison between the size of the data n and the "effective" size of the feature set X , by which we mean the number of unique feature vectors x that appear in the data.4 4Table Lookup predicts well when we have a large number of observations for each unique feature vector x ∈ X . This requires either that the feature space X is finite (as in our application in Section 8 One way to evaluate the accuracy of CVT L is to look at the standard error of the cross-validated prediction errors, which is (cid:114) 1 K Var(CVErr1, . . . , CVErrK). We report these standard errors for each of our applications and model classes. It turns out that for each of the applications we look at, and we suspect for other data sets as well, the Table Lookup standard errors are relatively small. (See Appendix A.1 for more detail.) As another test, we compare the performance of Table Lookup with a different machine learning algorithm that is better suited to smaller data sets (bagged decision trees), and find that Table Lookup's performance is comparable but better for all of our applications (see Appendix A.2). These analyses suggest that the Table Lookup performance is indeed a reasonable approximation for the best achievable performance in each of our applications. In place of the ideal completeness measure described in (2), we compute the fol- lowing ratio from our data: CVnaive − CVF CVnaive − CVT L . This is the ratio of reduction in cross-validated prediction error achieved by the model (relative to the naive baseline) compared to the reduction achieved by Table Lookup (again relative to the naive baseline). 1.4 Relationship to Literature Irreducible error is an old concept in statistics and machine learning, and a large amount of work has focused on further decomposing this error into bias (reflecting error due to the specification of the model class) and variance (reflecting sensitivity of the estimated rule to the randomness in the training data). Depending on the quantity of data available to the analyst, it may be preferable to trade off bias for 2.3, where X = {0, 1}7), or that the data-generating measure P has finite support over X (as in our two applications in Sections 2.1 and 2.2). In some settings with a continuum of possible features there may be very few observations for a given feature vector. In these cases, we cannot directly use Table Lookup to approximate the ideal performance, and should instead use approaches that make assumptions on how outcomes are related at "nearby" features, e.g. kernel regression. 9 variance or vice versa.5 This paper abstracts from these concerns, as well as the related concern of overfitting. We work exclusively with data sets where the quantity of data is large enough that the most predictive model is approximately the most complex one, i.e. Table Lookup (see Appendix A). A related literature compares the performance of specific machine learning algo- rithms to that of existing economic models. These algorithms are themselves poten- tially incomplete relative to the best achievable level, and thus provide a lower bound for the best achievable level, where the degree to which they are incomplete is a pri- ori unknown. The closest of these papers to our work is Peysakhovich and Naecker (2017), which studies choices under uncertainty and under ambiguity, and constructs a benchmark based on regularized regression algorithms.6 Erev et al. (2007) define a a model's equivalent number of observations as the number n of prior observations such that the mean of a data set of n random ob- servations has the same prediction error as the model. We expect that models with larger numbers of equivalent observations will be more complete by our metric. Finally, an alternative measure of a model's performance is the proportion of the variance in the outcome that it explains, that is the model's R2. This measure is not well suited to the question of the model's completeness, because the best achievable R2 cannot be directly inferred from the R2 of any existing model.7 2 Three Applications 2.1 Domain #1: Assigning Certain Equivalents to Lotteries Background and Data. An important question in economics is how individuals evaluate risk. In addition to the Expected Utility models (von Neumann and Mor- 5For example, given small quantities of data, we may prefer to work with models that have fewer free parameters, leading to higher bias but potentially substantially lower variance. 6In addition, Ori Plonsky (2017), Noti et al. (2016), and Plonsky et al. (2019) develops algorithmic models for predicting choice, Camerer et al. (2018) uses machine learning to predict disagreements in bargaining, and Aaron Bodoh-Creed and Hickman (2019) uses random forests to predict pricing variation. The improvements achieved by the algorithms are sometimes modest, perhaps due to intrinsic noise, as Bourgin et al. (2019) point out. We show how this noise can be quantified. 7We could, however, develop a notion of completeness based on comparing the achieved R2 with the best achievable R2, analogous to what we do here. 10 genstern, 1944; Savage, 1954; Samuelson, 1952), one of the most influential models of decision-making under risk in the last few decades has been Cumulative Prospect Theory (Tversky and Kahneman, 1992). This model provides a flexible family of risk preferences that accommodates certain behavioral anomalies, including reference- dependent preferences and nonlinear probability weighting. A standard experimental paradigm for eliciting risk preferences, and thus for eval- uating these models, is to ask subjects to report certainty equivalents for lotteries -- i.e. the lowest certain payment that the individual would prefer over the lottery. We con- sider a data set from Bruhin et al. (2010), which includes 8906 certainty equivalents elicited from 179 subjects, all of whom were students at the University of Zurich or the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. Subjects reported certainty equiv- alents for the same 50 two-outcome lotteries, half over positive outcomes (e.g. gains) and half over negative outcomes (e.g. losses). Prediction Task and Models. In this data set, the outcomes are the reported certainty equivalents for a given lottery, and the features are the lottery's two possible monetary prizes z1 and z2, and the probability p of the first prize. A prediction rule is any function that maps the tuple (z1, z2, p) into a prediction for the certainty equivalent, i.e. a function f : R × R × [0, 1] → R. We evaluate two prediction rules that are based on established models from the literature. Our Expected Utility (EU) rule sets the agent's utility function to be u(z) = zα, where α is a free parameter that we train. The predicted certainty equivalent is pzα Second, our Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) rule predicts w(p)v(z1) + (1 − w(p))v(z2) for each lottery, where w is a probability weighting function and v is a value function. We follow the literature (see e.g. Bruhin et al. (2010)) in assuming the functional forms: 1 + (1 − p)zα 2 . (cid:40) v(z) = zα −(−zβ) if z > 0 if z ≤ 0 w(p) = δpγ δpγ + (1 − p)γ . (5) This model has four free parameters α, β, δ, γ ∈ R+. Finally, as a naive benchmark, we predict the expected value of the lottery, which is p1z1 + (1 − p1)z2.8 8This naive benchmark is arguably less naive than the naive benchmarks we use for the other 11 Performance Metric. For a given test set of n observations {(z1 i , z2 (z1 alent -- we evaluate the prediction error of prediction rule f using i , pi) is the lottery shown in observation i, and yi is the reported certainty equiv- i=1 -- where i , pi; yi)}n i , z2 i , pi) − yi)(cid:1)2 . i , z2 (cid:0)f (z1 n(cid:88) i=1 1 n This loss function, mean-squared error, penalizes quadratic distance from the pre- dicted and actual response, and is minimized when f (z1, z2, p) is the mean response for lottery (z1, z2, p). To conduct out-of-sample tests of the models described above, we follow the stan- dard approach of tenfold cross-validation described in Section 1.3.1, estimating the free parameters of the model on training data and evaluating how well the estimated model predicts choices in a test set. Results. The following table reveals that both models are predictive, improving upon the Expected Value benchmark:9 Error Expected Utility Naive Benchmark 103.81 (4.00) 99.67 (4.50) 67.38 (4.49) CPT Table 1: Both models are predictive. The improvement of CPT over the naive benchmark is larger than that of Expected Utility, but the CPT performance is substantially worse than perfect prediction. It is prediction problems. Replacing our naive benchmark with, for example, an unconditional mean, would result in even higher completeness for CPT than we already find in Table 2. 9The parameter estimate for EU is α = 0.98, and the parameter estimates for CPT are α = 1.024, β = 0.975, δ = 0.5, and γ = 0.525. 12 not surprising that these models do not achieve perfect prediction, as we expect dif- ferent subjects to report different certainty equivalents for the same lottery, and thus a model that provides the same prediction for each (z1, z2, p) input cannot possibly predict every reported certainty equivalent. But another source for prediction error is the functional form assumptions that we made in (5). Could a different (potentially more complex) specification for the value function or probability weighting function lead to large gains in prediction? Moreover, might there be other features of risk evaluation, yet unmodelled, which lead to even larger improvements in prediction? To separate these sources of error, we need to understand how the CPT perfor- mance compares to the best achievable performance for this data. For this evaluation, we construct an ideal benchmark using a Table Lookup procedure. The lookup table's rows correspond to the 50 unique lotteries in our data, and the predicted certainty equivalent for each lottery is the mean response for that lottery in the training data. Given sufficiently many reports for each lottery, the lookup table prediction approx- imates the actual mean responses in the test data, and its error approximates the best possible error that is achievable by any prediction rule that takes (z1, z2, p) as its input. We report this benchmark below in Table 2: Error Completeness Expected Utility Naive Benchmark 103.81 (4.00) 99.67 (4.50) 67.38 (4.49) 65.58 (3.00) CPT Table Lookup 0% 11% 95% 100% Table 2: CPT is nearly complete for prediction of our data. The Table Lookup benchmark shows that no prediction rule based on (z1, z2, p) can improve more than slightly over CPT on this data, because CPT obtains 95% 13 of the feasible improvement in prediction.10 This tells us that to make substantially better predictions, we would need to expand the set of variables on which the model depends. For example, as we discuss in Section 11, we could group subjects using auxiliary data such as their evaluations of other lotteries or response times, and make separate predictions for each group. We note that our completeness measure does not imply that in general CPT is a nearly-complete model for predicting certainty equivalents, since the completeness measure we obtain is determined from a specific data set, and thus its generalizability depends on the extent to which that data is representative. Indeed, the data from Bruhin et al. (2010) has certain special features; for example, all lotteries in the data are over two possible outcomes. It would be an interesting exercise to evaluate the completeness of CPT using observations on lotteries with more complex supports. 2.2 Domain #2: Initial Play in Games In many game theory experiments, equilibrium analysis Background and Data. has been shown to be a poor predictor of the choices that people make when they encounter a new game. This has led to models of initial play that depart from equi- librium theory, for example the level-k models of Stahl and Wilson (1994) and Nagel (1995), the Poisson Cognitive Hierarchy model (Camerer et al., 2004), and the related models surveyed in Crawford et al. (2013). These models represent improvements over the equilibrium predictions, but we do not know how substantial these improvements are. Are there important regularities in play that have not yet been modeled? To study this question, we use a data set from Fudenberg and Liang (2018) con- sisting of 23,137 total observations of initial play from 486 3 × 3 matrix games.11,12 10From this data it is hard to know whether the high completeness of CPT (in the specified functional form) comes from its good match to actual behavior or because it is flexible enough to mimic Table Lookup on many data sets. We leave exploration of this question to future work. 11This data is an aggregate of three data sets: the first is a meta data set of play in 86 games, collected from six experimental game theory papers by Kevin Leyton-Brown and James Wright, see Wright and Leyton-Brown (2014); the second is a data set of play in 200 games with randomly generated payoffs, which were gathered on MTurk for Fudenberg and Liang (2018); the final is a data set of play in 200 games that were "algorithmically designed" for a certain model (level 1) to perform poorly, again from Fudenberg and Liang (2018). 12There was no learning in these experiments -- subjects were randomly matched to opponents, 14 As in the previous section, we pool observations across all of the subjects and games. Prediction Task, Performance Metric, and Models. In the prediction prob- lem we consider here, the outcome is the action that is chosen by the row player in a given instance of play, and the features are the 18 entries of the payoff matrix. A prediction rule is thus any map f : R18 → {a1, a2, a3} from 3 × 3 payoff matrices to row player actions. For each prediction rule f and test set of observations {(gi, ai}n i=1 -- where gi is the payoff matrix in observation i, and ai is the observed row player action -- we evaluate error using the misclassification rate n(cid:88) i=1 1 n 1 (f (gi) (cid:54)= ai)) . This is the fraction of observations where the predicted action was not the observed action. As a naive baseline, we consider guessing uniformly at random for all games, which yields an expected misclassification rate of 2/3. Additionally, we consider a prediction rule based on the Poisson Cognitive Hierarchy Model (PCHM), which supposes that there is a distribution over players of differing levels of sophistication: The level- 0 player is maximally unsophisticated and randomizes uniformly over his available actions, while the level-1 player best responds to level-0 play (Stahl and Wilson, 1994, 1995; Nagel, 1995). Camerer et al. (2004) defines the play of level-k players, k ≥ 2, to be best responses to a perceived distribution πτ (h)(cid:80)k−1 l=0 πτ (l) pk(h) = ∀ h ∈ N<k (6) over (lower) opponent levels, where πτ is the Poisson distribution with rate parameter τ .13 A predicted distribution over actions is derived by supposing that the proportion of level-k players in the population is proportional to πτ (k). Assuming this is the true distribution of play, the misclassification rate is minimized by predicting the mode of this distribution, and this is what we set as the PCHM prediction. were not informed of their partners' play, and did not learn their own payoffs until the end of the session. 13Throughout, we take τ to be a free parameter and estimate it from the training data. 15 As in Section 2.1, we estimate the free parameter τ on training data, and evaluate the out-of-sample prediction of the estimated model. All reported prediction errors are tenfold cross-validated. Results. Because we use the classification loss as the loss function, the best attain- able classification error will differ across games: In games where all subjects choose the same action, the perfect 0-error prediction is feasible, but when play is close to uniform over the actions, it will be hard to improve over random guessing. This means that the same level of predictive accuracy should potentially be evaluated quite differently, depending on what kinds of games are being predicted. We illustrate this by comparing predictions for two subsets of our data: Data Set A consists of the 16,660 observations of play from the 359 games with no strictly dominated actions.14 Data Set B consists of the 7,860 observations of play from the 161 games in which the action profile with the highest sum of player payoffs is outside of the support of level-k actions,15 and moreover the difference in the payoff sums is large (at least 20% of the largest row player payoff in the game.) For example, the following game is included in Data Set B: a1 a2 a3 a1 40, 40 10, 20 70, 30 a2 20, 10 80, 80 0, 100 a3 30, 70 100, 0 60, 60 In this game, action a3 is level 1, since it yields the highest expected payoff against uniform play, and action a1 is level 2, since it is a best response against play of a1. Because (a1, a1) is a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium, action a1 is then level-k for all k ≥ 2. The highest possible player sum achieved by playing either a1 or a3 is 120 (from action profile (a3, a3)), but the action profile (a2, a2) yields a higher payoff sum of 160. The difference, 40, is 1/2 of the max row player payoff in this game, 80. In both data sets, a range of values for the free parameter τ generate the same predicted modal action, and so have the same cross-validated prediction error. For all 14Specifically, we consider games where no pure action is strictly dominated by another pure action. 15Here we use the classic definition from Stahl and Wilson (1995) and Nagel (1995), where each level-k action is the best response to the level-(k − 1) action. 16 of the games in our data, this mode is simply the level-1 action. But as Table 3 shows, PCHM improves upon the naive benchmark by a larger amount for prediction of play in Data Set B, compared to Data Set A. Using perfect prediction as the benchmark, this would imply that PCHM is a more complete model of play for games in Data Set B.16 Data Set A Data Set B Naive Benchmark PCHM 0.66 0.49 0.66 0.44 (0.004) (0.009) Table 3: PCHM improves upon the naive baseline by a larger amount for prediction of play in Data Set B. But the amount of irreducible error in the two data sets may be quite different, leading to different predictive limits. Thus we need to understand how the prediction errors compare to the best achievable error for the two data sets. We can again gain insight into this by building a lookup table. The rows of the table are the different games, and the associated predictions are the modal actions (observed for those games) in the training data. Given sufficiently many observations, the modal action in the training data will also be the action most likely to be played in the test data, thus minimizing classification error. Below we report the Table Lookup performance and completeness measures rela- tive to this performance. 16Instead of our task of predicting each action, Fudenberg and Liang (2018) studies the task of predicting the modal action in each game; the ideal prediction for that task always has no error at all. Correspondingly for that prediction task, Fudenberg and Liang (2018) also used a different cross-validation procedure: Instead of dividing the data into folds at random as described above, it split the set of games so that the games in the training set were not used for testing.This alternative is relevant for the study of how well we can extrapolate from one game to another, which is not the question of interest here. 17 Data Set A Data Set B Error Completeness Error Completeness Naive Benchmark PCHM 0.66 0.49 Table Lookup (0.006) 0.41 (0.005) 0% 68% 100% 0.66 0.44 (0.009) 0.34 (0.006) 0% 67% 100% Table 4: PCHM achieves roughly the same completeness for both data sets. Although PCHM achieves a smaller absolute improvement over the naive baseline for Data Set A, the achievable improvement is also lower. Thus, relative to the appropriate benchmarks, the completeness of PCHM is in fact roughly equivalent for the two data sets (and marginally lower for Data Set B). This comparison illustrates how prediction accuracy can be misleading without an accompanying benchmark. Our exercise here is not special to the two sets of games we have examined; indeed, we can repeat the analysis for other subsets of the data, and determine completeness measures for each of these. For example, Table 5 reports prediction errors for data set consisting of the 9,243 observations of play from the 175 games where the level 1 action's expected payoff against uniform play is much higher than the expected payoff of the next best action (specifically, it is larger by at least 1/4 of the max row player payoff in the game). Error Completeness Naive Benchmark PCHM 0.66 0.28 Table Lookup (0.004) 0.27 (0.005) 0% 97% 100% Table 5: Prediction errors for games in which the level-1 action is much better against uniform play than the next best action. 18 The Table Lookup error is much lower for this set of games, revealing that for these games, play is much more concentrated on a single action. Thus we would hope for our models to also achieve higher predictive accuracies, and indeed we find that PCHM predicts an incorrect action only 28% of the time. For a more exhaustive inquiry into when PCHM succeeds and fails, we could elicit completeness measures for different subsets of the data, and identify those games where PCHM is most incomplete. 2.3 Domain #3: Human Generation of Random Sequences Background and Data. Extensive experimental and empirical evidence suggests that humans misperceive randomness, expecting for example that sequences of coin flips "self-correct" (too many Heads in a row must be followed by a Tails) and are balanced (the proportion of Heads and Tails are approximately the same) (Bar-Hillel and Wagenaar, 1991; Tversky and Kahneman, 1971). These misperceptions are sig- nificant not only for their basic psychological interest, but also for the ways in which misperception of randomness manifests itself in a variety of contexts: for example, investors' judgment of sequences of (random) stock returns (Barberis et al., 1998), professional decision-makers' reluctance to choose the same (correct) option multiple times in succession (Chen et al., 2016), and people's execution of a mixed strategy in a game (Batzilis et al., 2016). A common experimental framework in this area is to ask human participants to generate fixed-length strings of k (pseudo-)random coin flips, for some small value of k (e.g. k = 8), and then to compare the produced distribution over length-k strings to the output of a Bernoulli process that generates realizations from {H, T} independently and uniformly at random (Rapaport and Budescu, 1997; Nickerson and Butler, 2009). Following in this tradition, we use the platform Mechanical Turk to collect a large dataset of human-generated strings designed to simulate the output of a Bernoulli(0.5) process, in which each symbol in the string is generated from {H, T} independently and uniformly at random. To incentive effort, we told subjects that payment would be approved only if their (set of) strings could not be identified as 19 human-generated with high confidence.17,18 Following removal of subjects who were clearly not attempting to mimic a random process, our final data set consisted of 21,975 strings generated by 167 subjects.19 Prediction Task, Performance Metric, and Models. We consider the problem of predicting the probability that the eighth entry in a string is H given its first seven elements. Thus the outcome here is a number in [0, 1] -- that is a distribution on {H, T} -- and the feature space is {H, T}7 (note that as in the previous examples we fit a representative-agent model and do not treat the identity of the subject as feature). Given a test dataset {(s1 i , . . . , s8 i=1 of n binary strings of length-8, we evaluate the error of the prediction rule f using mean-squared error i )}n (cid:0)s8 n(cid:88) i=1 1 n i )(cid:1)2 i − f (s1 i , . . . , s7 i , . . . , s7 where f (s1 i ) is the predicted probability that the eighth flip is 'H' given the i is the actual eighth flip.20 Note that the observed initial seven flips s1 naive baseline of unconditionally guessing 0.5 guarantees a mean-squared prediction i , and s8 i , . . . , s7 17In one experiment, 537 subjects each whom produced 50 binary strings of length eight. In a second experiment, an additional 101 subjects were asked to each generate 25 binary strings of length eight. 18Subjects were informed: "To encourage effort in this task, we have developed an algorithm (based on previous Mechanical Turkers) that detects human-generated coin flips from computer- generated coin flips. You are approved for payment only if our computer is not able to identify your flips as human-generated with high confidence." 19Our initial data set consists of 29,375 binary strings. We chose to remove all subjects who repeated any string in more than five rounds. This cutoff was selected by looking at how often each subject generated any given string, and finding the average "highest frequency" across subjects. This turned out to be 10% of the strings, or five strings. Thus, our selection criteria removes all subjects whose highest frequency was above average. This selection eliminated 167 subjects and 7,400 strings, yielding a final dataset with 471 subjects and 21,975 strings. We check that our main results are not too sensitive to this selection criteria by considering two alternative choices in Appendix C.2 -- first, keeping only the initial 25 strings generated by all subjects, and then, removing the subjects whose strings are "most different" from a Bernoulli process under a χ2-test. We find very similar results under these alternative criteria. 20Alternatively we could have defined the outcome to be an individual realization of H or T , so that prediction rules are maps f : {H, T}7 → {H, T}, and then evaluated error using the misclassification 20 (cid:32) k−2(cid:88) (cid:33) error of 0.25. Moreover, if the strings in the test set were truly generated via a Bernoulli(0.5) process, then no prediction rule could improve in expectation upon the naive error.21 We expect that the presence of behavioral errors in the generation process will make it possible to improve upon the naive baseline, but do not know how much it is possible to improve upon 0.25. In this task, the natural naive baseline is the rule that unconditionally guesses that the probability the final flip is 'H' is 0.5. We compare this to prediction rules based on Rabin (2002) and Rabin and Vayanos (2010), both of which predict generation of negatively autocorrelated sequences.22 Our prediction rule based on Rabin (2002) supposes that subjects generate sequences by drawing sequentially without replace- ment from an urn containing 0.5N '1' balls and 0.5N '0' balls. The urn is "refreshed" (meaning the composition is returned to its original) every period with independent probability p. This model has two free parameters: N ∈ Z+ and p ∈ [0, 1]. Our prediction rule based on Rabin and Vayanos (2010) assumes that the first flip s1 ∼ Bernoulli(0.5) while each subsequent flip sk is distributed sk ∼ Ber 0.5 − α δt(2 · sk−t−1 − 1) , where the parameter δ ∈ R+ reflects the (decaying) influence of past flips, and the parameter α ∈ R+ measures the strength of negative autocorrelation.23 t=0 Results. Table 6 shows that both prediction rules improve upon the naive baseline. The need for a benchmark for achievable prediction is starkest in this application, however, as the best improvement is only 0.0008, while the gap between the best rate (i.e. the fraction of instances where the predicted outcome was not the realized outcome). We do not take a stand on which method is better, but note that the completeness measure can depend on which one is used. In Appendix C.1 we show that the completeness measures are very similar using this alternative formulation. 21Due to the convexity of the loss function, it is possible to do worse than the naive baseline, for example by predicting 1 unconditionally. 22Although both of these frameworks are models of mistaken inference from data, as opposed to human attempts to generate random sequences, they are easily adapted to our setting, as the papers explained. 23We make a small modification on the Rabin and Vayanos (2010) model, allowing α, δ ∈ R+ instead of α, δ ∈ [0, 1). 21 prediction error and a perfect zero is large. This is not surprising, as we expect substantial variation in the eighth flip following the same initial seven flips because we asked subjects to mimic a fair coin. Naive Benchmark Rabin (2002) Rabin and Vayanos (2010) Error 0.25 0.2494 (0.0007) 0.2492 (0.0007) Table 6: Both models improve upon naive guessing, but the absolute improvement is small. For this problem, the lookup table's rows correspond to the 27 unique initial seven- flip sequences, and we associate each such string to the empirical frequency with which that string is followed by 'H' in the training data. Given a sufficiently large training set, we can approximate the true continuation frequency for each initial sequence, and hence approximate the best achievable error. We note here that although there are 27 unique initial sequences, with approximately 21,000 strings in our data set, we have (on average) 164 observations per initial sequence. 22 Error Completeness Naive Benchmark Rabin (2002) Rabin & Vayanos (2010) Table Lookup 0.25 0.2494 (0.0007) 0.2492 (0.0007) 0.2441 (0.0006) 0 10% 14% 100% Table 7: The Table Lookup benchmark permits a more accurate representation of the completeness of these models. We find that Table Lookup achieves a prediction error of 0.2439, so that naively comparing achieved prediction error against perfect prediction (which would suggest a completeness measure of at most 0.4%) grossly misrepresents the performance of the models. Relative to the Table Lookup benchmark, the existing models produce up to 14% of the achievable improvement in prediction error. This suggests that although negative autocorrelation is indeed present in the human-generated strings, and explains a sizable part of the deviation from a Bernoulli(0.5) process, there is additional structure that could yet be exploited for prediction. 3 Extensions 3.1 Subject Heterogeneity So far we've focused on evaluating representative agent models that implement a single prediction across all subjects. When we evaluate models that include subject heterogeneity, the question of what is the best achievable level of accuracy is still relevant, and the suitable analogue of Table Lookup -- with subject type added as an additional feature -- can again help us to determine this. The exact implementation of Table Lookup will depend on how the groups are determined. As a simple illustration, we return to our first domain -- evaluation of risk -- and demonstrate how to construct 23 a predictive bound for certain models with subject heterogeneity. The models that we consider extend the Expected Utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory models introduced in Section 2.1 by allowing for three groups of subjects. To test the models, we randomly select 71 (out of 171) subjects to be test subjects, and 45 (out of 50) lotteries to be test lotteries. All other data -- the 100 training sub- ject's choices in all lotteries, as well as the test subject's choices in the 5 training lotteries -- are used for training the models. In more detail, we first use the training subjects' responses in the training lotteries to develop a clustering algorithm for separating subjects into three groups.24 This algorithm can be used to assign a group number to any new subject based on their choices in the five training lotteries. Second, we use each group's training subjects' responses in the test lotteries to estimate free model parameters -- that is, the single free parameter of the EU model, and the four free parameters for CPT. This yields three versions of EU and CPT, one per group. Out of sample, we first use the clustering algorithm to assign groups to the test subjects, and then use the associated models to predict their certainty equivalents in the test lotteries. We measure accuracy using mean-squared error, as in Section 2.1, and we again report the Expected Value prediction as a naive baseline. Prediction Error Naive Benchmark Expected Utility CPT 91.13 (10.44) 86.68 (10.69) 57.14 (7.17) Table 8: Prediction Errors Achieved by Models with Subject Heterogeneity What we find from Table 8 is very similar to what we observed in Section 2.1: Both models improve upon the naive baseline, but we do not know how complete 24We use a simple algorithm, k-means, which minimizes the Euclidean distance between the vectors of reported certainty equivalents for subjects within the same group. 24 these improvements are. To better evaluate the achieved improvements, we need a benchmark that tells us the best feasible prediction. Our approach here for constructing an upper bound is to learn the mean response of training subjects in each group for each lottery, and predict those means. With sufficiently many training subjects, this method approximates the best possible ac- curacy. We find that although the CPT error is substantially different from zero, the model is again nearly complete. Prediction Error Completeness Naive Benchmark Expected Utility CPT Table Lookup 104.17 (12.95) 86.68 (10.69) 57.14 (7.17) 55.45 (6.26) 0% 36% 96% 100% Because the same clustering method is used in all of the approaches, the gap between Table Lookup and the existing models does not shed light on how much pre- dictions could be improved by better ways of grouping the subjects. The comparison of Table Lookup's performance here, 55.45, with its performance from Section 2.1, 65.58, sheds light on the size of predictive gains achieved by the present method for clustering. 3.2 Comparing Feature Sets In addition to evaluating the predictive limits of a feature set and the completeness of existing models, Table Lookup can be used to compare the predictive power of different feature sets. We illustrate this potential comparison by revisiting our prob- lem from Section 2.3 -- predicting human generation of randomness -- and evaluating the predictive value of certain features. To do this, we consider "compressed" Table 25 Lookup algorithms built on different properties of the string, where strings of the same type are bucketed into the same row, and focus on the the predictive value of two properties: number of Heads, and flips 4-8. Our compressed Table Lookup based on the number of Heads partitions the set of length-7 strings depending on the total number 'H' flips in the string, and learns a prediction for each partition element; similarly, our compressed Table Lookup based on flips 4-7 partitions the set of strings depending only on outcomes including and after flip 4. Just as our original Table Lookup algorithm returned an approximation of the highest level of predictive accuracy using the full structure of initial flip data, these compressed Table Lookup algorithms approximate the highest level of predictive accuracy that is achievable using a particular kind of structure in the strings. Table 9: Comparison of the value of various feature sets. Error Completeness Naive Benchmark Flips 4-7 Number of Heads Full Table Lookup 0.25 0.2478 (0.0010) 0.2464 (0.0009) 0.2441 (0.0006) 0% 36% 59% 100% We find that these simple features achieve large fractions of the achievable im- provement over the naive rule of always predicting that the probability of H is 1/2. For example, using only the number of Heads as a feature achieves 59% of the im- provement of full Table Lookup. Using only the most recent three flips achieves 36% of the predictive improvement that is achieved by using all seven initial flips; the fact that this improvement is not complete demonstrates that there is predictive content in flips 1-3 beyond what is captured in flips 4-7. The feature set corresponding to our "Full Table Lookup" is itself partial relative to an even richer feature set. It is interesting to consider what might constitute a set of unmeasured features of the human participant's behavior that would significantly 26 improve predictive accuracy, for example the speed at which the strings were entered. The exercise in Section 3.1, in which we used subject types (determined based on choices in auxiliary problems), constitutes yet another way to expand the table. As we have shown above, the application and comparison of Table Lookup for different feature sets is one potentially useful approach for measuring the predictive value of those features.25 4 Conclusion When evaluating the predictive performance of a theory, it is important to know not just whether the theory is predictive, but also how complete its predictive performance is. We propose the use of Table Lookup as a way to measure the best achievable predictive performance for a given problem, and the completeness of a model as a measure of how close it comes to this bound. We demonstrate three domains in which completeness can help us to evaluate the performance of existing models. The present paper has focused on the criterion of predictiveness. When we take other criteria into account, such as the interpretability or generality of the model, then we may prefer models that are not 100% complete by the measure proposed here -- for example, we may prefer to sacrifice some predictive power in return for higher explainability, as in Fudenberg and Liang (2018). Finally, we note that all the tests mentioned so far involve training and testing models on data drawn from the same domain. A question for future work would be how to compare the transferability of models across domains. Indeed, we may expect that economic models that are outperformed by machine learning models in a given domain have higher transfer performance outside of the domain. In this sense, within-domain completeness may provide an incomplete measure of the "overall completeness" of the model, and we leave development of such notions to future work. 25Note that the value of individual features will in general depend on what other features are available. 27 References Aaron Bodoh-Creed, J. B. and B. Hickman (2019): "Using Machine Learning to Explain Price Dispersion," . Bar-Hillel, M. and W. Wagenaar (1991): "The Perception of Randomness," Advances in Applied Mathematics. Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (1998): "A Model of Investor Senti- ment," Journal of Financial Economics. Batzilis, D., S. Jaffe, S. Levitt, J. A. List, and J. Picel (2016): "How Face- book Can Deepen our Understanding of Behavior in Strategic Settings: Evidence from a Million Rock-Paper-Scissors Games," Working Paper. Bourgin, D. D., J. C. Peterson, D. Reichman, T. L. Griffiths, and S. J. Russell (2019): "Cognitive Model Priors for Predicting Human Decisions," CoRR, abs/1905.09397. Bruhin, A., H. Fehr-Duda, and T. Epper (2010): "Risk and Rationality: Un- covering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion," Econometrica. Camerer, C. F., T.-H. Ho, and J.-K. Chong (2004): "A cognitive hierarchy model of games," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 861 -- 898. Camerer, C. F., G. Nave, and A. Smith (2018): "Dynamic unstructured bar- gaining with private information: theory, experiment, and outcome prediction via machine learning," Management Science. Chen, D., K. Shue, and T. Moskowitz (2016): "Decision-Making under the Gambler's Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," Quarterly Journal of Economics. Crawford, V. P., M. A. Costa-Gomes, and N. Iriberri (2013): "Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications," Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 5 -- 62. Domingos, P. (2000): "A Unified Bias-Variance Decomposition and its Applica- tions," Proc. 17th International Conf. on Machine Learning. Erev, I., A. E. Roth, R. L. Slonim, and G. Barron (2007): "Learning and equilibrium as useful approximations: Accuracy of prediction on randomly selected constant sum games," Economic Theory, 33, 29 -- 51. Fudenberg, D. and A. Liang (2018): "Predicting and Understanding Initial 28 Play," Working Paper. Gneiting, T. and A. E. Raftery (2007): "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Pre- diction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman (2009): The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer. Kleinberg, J., H. Lakkaraju, J. Leskovec, J. Ludwig, and S. Mul- lainathan (2017): "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Nagel, R. (1995): "Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study," Amer- ican Economic Review, 85, 1313 -- 1326. Nickerson, R. and S. Butler (2009): "On Producing Random Sequences," American Journal of Psychology. Noti, G., E. Levi, Y. Kolumbus, and A. Daniely (2016): "Behavior-Based Machine-Learning: A Hybrid Approach for Predicting Human Decision Making," CoRR, abs/1611.10228. Ori Plonsky, Ido Erev, T. H. M. T. (2017): "Psychological forest: Predicting human behavior," AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Peysakhovich, A. and J. Naecker (2017): "Using Methods from Machine Learn- ing to Evaluate Behavioral Models of Choice Under Risk and Ambiguity," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Plonsky, O., R. Apel, E. Ert, M. Tennenholtz, D. Bourgin, J. C. Peter- son, D. Reichman, T. L. Griffiths, S. J. Russell, E. C. Carter, J. F. Cavanagh, and I. Erev (2019): "Predicting human decisions with behavioral theories and machine learning," CoRR, abs/1904.06866. Rabin, M. (2000): "Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory: A Calibration The- orem," Econometrica, 68, 1281 -- 1292. -- -- -- (2002): "Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers," The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Rabin, M. and D. Vayanos (2010): "The Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications," Review of Economic Studies. Rapaport, A. and D. Budescu (1997): "Randomization in Individual Choice Behavior," Psychological Review. Samuelson, P. (1952): "Probability, Utility, and the Independence Axiom," Econo- 29 metrica. Savage, L. (1954): The Foundations of Statistics, J. Wiley. Stahl, D. O. and P. W. Wilson (1994): "Experimental evidence on players' models of other players," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 309 -- 327. -- -- -- (1995): "On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evi- dence," Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 218 -- 254. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1971): "The Belief in the Law of Small Num- bers," Psychological Bulletin. -- -- -- (1992): "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncer- tainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297 -- 323. von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press. Wright, J. R. and K. Leyton-Brown (2014): "Level-0 meta-models for pre- dicting human behavior in games," Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation, 857 -- 874. 30 Appendix A Is Table Lookup the most predictive algorithm for our data? In the main text, we use the performance of Table Lookup as an approximation of the best possible accuracy. Below we investigate whether the data sets we study are large enough for this to be a good approximation. We first review some results from the machine learning and statistics literatures, which explain how the cross-validated standard errors that we report in the main text can be used as a measure for how well the Table Lookup error approximates the irreducible error (Section A.1). In Section A.2, we compare Table Lookup's performance with that of bagged decision trees, an algorithm that scales better to smaller quantities of data. We find that in each of our prediction problems, the two prediction errors are similar, and Table Lookup weakly outperforms bagged decision trees. Finally, in Section A.3, we study the sensitivity of the Table Lookup performance to the quantity of data. The predictive accuracies achieved using our full data sets are very close to those achieved using, for example, just 70% of the data. This again suggests that only minimal improvements in predictive accuracy are feasible from further increases in data size. A.1 Cross-Validated Standard Error Suppose that the loss function is mean-squared error: L(y(cid:48), y) = (y(cid:48) − y)2. (Similar arguments apply for the misclassification rate; see e.g. Domingos (2000).) Let P (x) = EP [y x] f∗ be the ideal prediction rule discussed in Section 1.2, which assigns to each x its expected outcome y under distribution P . Write fT L[Z] for the random Table Lookup prediction rule that has been estimated from a set Z of n i.i.d. training observations. The expected mean-squared error of fT L on a new observation (x, y) ∼ P can be 31 decomposed as follows (Hastie et al., 2009): E[(fT L[Z](x) − y)2] = E[(f∗(x) − y)2] (cid:125) (cid:124) irreducible noise (cid:124) (cid:123)(cid:122) (cid:123)(cid:122) bias (cid:125) (cid:124) + (E[fT L[Z](x)] − f∗(x))2 + E[(fT L[Z](x) − E[fT L[Z](x)])2] (cid:123)(cid:122) sampling error (cid:125) where the expectation is both over the realization of the training data Z used to train Table Lookup, and also over the realization of the test observation (x, y). The first component is the irreducible noise introduced in (1). The second compo- nent, bias, is the mean-squared difference between the expected Table Lookup predic- tion and the prediction of the ideal prediction rule f∗. The final component, sampling error or variance, is the variance of the Table Lookup prediction (reflecting the sen- sitivity of the algorithm to the training data). Since Table Lookup is an unbiased estimator, the second component is zero. Thus, irreducible noise is the difference between the expected Table Lookup error and the sampling error of the Table Lookup predictor. As described in Section 1.3, we follow standard procedures of using the cross-validated prediction error to estimate the ex- pected Table Lookup error, and using the variance of the cross-validated prediction errors to estimate the sampling error (Hastie et al., 2009). That is, E[(fT L[Z](x) − E[fT L[Z](x)])2] ≈ 1 K Var({CV1, . . . , CVK}) where CVi is the prediction error for the i-th iteration of cross-validation. The right- hand side of the display is the square of the cross-validated standard errors reported in the main text; thus, we have from Tables 2, 4, and 7: Table Lookup Error Sampling Error Risk Preferences Predicting Initial Play, Data Set A Predicting Initial Play, Data Set B Human Generation of Random Sequences 65.58 0.41 0.34 0.2441 9 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 32 A.2 Comparison with Scalable Machine Learning Algorithms Another way to evaluate whether our Table Lookup algorithm approximates the best possible prediction accuracy is to compare it with the performance of other machine learning algorithms. Below we compare its performance with bagged decision trees (also known as bootstrap-aggregated decision trees). This algorithm creates several bootstrapped data sets from the training data by sampling with replacement, and then trains a decision tree on each bootstrapped training set. Decision trees are nonlinear prediction models that recursively partition the feature space and learn a (best) constant prediction for each partition element. The prediction of the bagged decision tree algorithm is an aggregation of the predictions of individual decision trees. When the loss function is mean-squared error, the decision tree ensemble predicts the average of the predictions of the individual trees. When the loss function is misclassification rate, the decision tree ensemble predicts based on a majority vote across the ensemble of trees. Table 10 shows that for each prediction problem, the error of the bagged decision tree algorithm is comparable to and slightly worse than that of the Table Lookup algorithm. These results again suggest that the Table Lookup error is a reasonable approximation for the best achievable error. Bagged Decision Trees Table Lookup Risk Games A Games B Sequences 65.65 (0.10) 65.58 (3.00) 0.45 0.36 (0.004) (0.005) 0.41 0.34 (0.005) (0.006) 0.2442 (0.0005) 0.2441 (0.0006) Table 10: Table Lookup outperforms Bagged Decision Trees in each of our prediction problems. A.3 Performance of Table Lookup on Smaller Samples Finally, we report the Table Lookup cross-validated performance on random samples of x% of our data, where x ∈ {10, 20, . . . , 100}. For each x, we repeat the procedure 33 1000 times, and report the average performance across iterations. We find that the Table Lookup performance flattens out for larger values of x, suggesting that the quantity of data we have is indeed large enough that further increases in the data size will not substantially improve predictive performance. x% Risk Games A Games B Sequences 50% 60% 20% 10% 69.47 (11.13) 67.13 (7.95) 66.28 (6.51) 66.25 (5.65) 65.68 (4.59) 65.68 (4.24) 65.68 (3.95) 65.68 (3.95) 65.66 (3.71) 100% 65.58 (3.00) 70% 80% 30% 40% 90% 0.4191 (0.012) 0.4183 (0.0018) 0.4178 (0.0022) 0.4169 (0.0024) 0.4157 (0.0025) 0.4141 (0.0027) 0.4131 (0.0031) 0.4119 (0.0034) 0.4109 (0.0034) 0.4100 (0.0036) 0.3473 (0.018) 0.3476 (0.024) 0.3472 (0.0029) 0.3470 (0.0032) 0.3459 (0.0036) 0.3449 (0.0040) 0.3435 (0.0045) 0.3427 (0.0046) 0.3416 (0.0047) 0.3404 (0.0051) 0.2592 (0.0034) 0.2504 (0.0018) 0.2479 (0.0014) 0.2464 (0.0011) 0.2458 (0.0010) 0.2452 (0.0008) 0.2448 (0.0007) 0.2445 (0.0007) 0.2443 (0.0007) 0.2441 (0.0006) Table 11: Performance of Table Lookup using x% of the data, averaged over 100 iterations for each x 34 B Experimental Instructions for Section 2.3 Subjects on Mechanical Turk were presented with the following introduction screen: 35 C Supplementary Material to Section 2.3 C.1 Robustness Here we check how our results in Section 2.3 change when the outcome space and error function are changed so that prediction functions are maps f : {H, T}7 → {H, T} and the error for predicting the test data set {(s1 i}n i=1 is defined to be i , . . . , s8 n(cid:88) i=1 1 n 1(s8 i (cid:54)= f (s1 i , . . . , s7 i )), i.e. the misclassification rate. We use as a naive benchmark the prediction rule that guesses H and T uniformly at random; this is guaranteed an expected misclassification rate of 0.50. For this problem, the Table Lookup benchmark learns the modal continuation for each sequence in {0, 1}7. We find that the completeness of Rabin (2002) and Rabin (2000) relative to the Table Lookup benchmark are respectively 19% and 9%. Error Completeness Naive Benchmark Rabin (2002) Rabin & Vayanos (2010) Table Lookup 0.50 0.45 (0.003) 0.475 (0.01) 0.23 (0.002) 0 19% 9% 1 C.2 Different Cuts of the Data Initial strings only. We repeat the analysis in Section 2.3 using data from all sub- jects, but only their first 25 strings. This selection accounts for potential fatigue in generation of the final strings, and leaves a total of 638 subjects and 15,950 strings. Prediction results for our main exercise are shown below using this alternative selec- tion. 36 Naive Benchmark Rabin & Vayanos (2010) Table Lookup Error Completeness 0.25 0.2491 (0.0008) 0.2326 (0.0030) 0 5% 100% Removing the least random subjects. For each subject, we conduct a Chi- squared test for the null hypothesis that their strings were generated under a Bernoulli process. We order subjects by p-values and remove the 100 subjects with the lowest p-values (subjects whose generated strings were most different from what we would expect under a Bernoulli process). This leaves a total of 538 subjects and 24,550 strings. Prediction results for our main exercise are shown below using this alternative selection. Naive Benchmark Rabin & Vayanos (2010) Table Lookup Error Completeness 0.25 0.2491 (0.0005) 0.2427 (0.0016) 0 12% 100% 37
1908.00445	1	1908	2019-07-22T06:57:21	The interest rate for saving as a possibilistic risk	[ "econ.TH" ]	In the paper there is studied an optimal saving model in which the interest-rate risk for saving is a fuzzy number. The total utility of consumption is defined by using a concept of possibilistic expected utility. A notion of possibilistic precautionary saving is introduced as a measure of the variation of optimal saving level when moving from a sure saving model to a possibilistic risk model. A first result establishes a necessary and sufficient condition that the presence of a possibilistic interest-rate risk generates an extra-saving. This result can be seen as a possibilistic version of a Rothschilld and Stiglitz theorem on a probabilistic model of saving. A second result of the paper studies the variation of the optimal saving level when moving from a probabilistic model (the interest-rate risk is a random variable) to a possibilistic model (the interest-rate risk is a fuzzy number).	econ.TH	econ	The interest rate for saving as a possibilistic risk Irina Georgescu Bucharest University of Economics Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics Piat¸a Romana No 6 R 70167, Oficiul Postal 22, Bucharest, Romania Email: [email protected] and Jani Kinnunen Abo Akademi University, Tuomiokirkkotori 3, Turku, 20500, Finland Email: [email protected] Abstract In the paper there is studied an optimal saving model in which the interest-rate risk for saving is a fuzzy number. The total utility of con- sumption is defined by using a concept of possibilistic expected utility. A notion of possibilistic precautionary saving is introduced as a measure of the variation of optimal saving level when moving from a sure saving model to a possibilistic risk model. A first result establishes a necessary and sufficient condition that the presence of a possibilistic interest-rate risk generates an extra-saving. This result can be seen as a possibilistic version of a Rothschilld and Stiglitz theorem on a probabilistic model of saving. A second result of the paper studies the variation of the optimal saving level when moving from a probabilistic model (the interest-rate risk is a random variable) to a possibilistic model (the interest-rate risk is a fuzzy number). Keywords: possibilistic models of saving, possibilistic expected theory, in- terest rate risk for saving, possibilistic precautionary saving 1 Introduction The study of risk effects on saving decisions started with the papers of Leland, [18], Sandmo [23] and Dr`eze and Modigliani [6]. They investigated the way the presence of a labor-income risk influences the increase or the decrease in the optimal saving level. At the same time, Sandmo [23] and Rothschild and Stiglitz [22] studied into the changes caused by an interest-rate risk on the optimal saving. The notion of precautionary saving was introduced as a measure of the vari- ation of optimal saving when moving from a certain optimal saving model to 1 a saving model with risk. The positivity of precautionary saving indicates the fact that the consumer increases the optimal saving level in the presence of a risk. In case of a saving model with labor-income risk, the precautionary saving is positive if and only if the third derivative of the utility function is positive. By Kimball [16], [17] this last condition tells us that the consumer is prudent. If an interest-rate risk for saving is present in the model, then by a Rothschild and Stiglitz theorem from [22], the precautionary saving is positive if and only if the relative prudence index is higher than 2. An new proof of this theorem was given by Magnani in [21]. Further on, the theme of the effects of the two types of risk (labor-income risk and interest-rate risk) on precautionary saving has been developed by Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger [9], Li [19], Baiardi et al. [1], etc. An intuitive exposure of the theme described above can be found in section 6 of the monograph [8]. On the other hand, Zadeh's possibility theory [25] offers another way to model risk (by [7], [3], [10]). Thereby risk can be thought of as a possibility distribution, particularly, a fuzzy number. Possibilistic approaches to themes of risk theory can be found in monographs [3], [10], as well as in a series of papers [4], [11], [12], [13] etc. In particular, the paper [4] develops an optimal saving model in which the labor-income risk is a fuzzy number. As a continuation of paper [4], in this paper we deal with an optimal saving model in which the interest-rate risk for saving is a fuzzy number. Following a parallel line with [22], [8] or [9], the construction of our model is situated inside the possibilistic EU-theory from [12]. The total utility function of consumption is defined using the possibilistic expected utility in [12]. We define a new notion of possibilistic precautionary saving and we characterize its positivity in terms of relative prudence index. This result can be regarded as a possibilistic variant of Rothschild and Stiglitz theorem from [22], [20]. We briefly present the content of the paper. In Section 2 there are recalled from [2], [3], [10], [11] the definitions of possibilistic expected utility, the main indicators associated with a fuzzy number (the possibilistic expected value, the possibilistic variance), as well as basic properties of these indicators. Section 3 contains the construction of the optimal saving model in which the rate of interest for saving is a fuzzy number. In Section 4 a notion of possibilistic precautionary saving is defined and a Rothschild and Stiglitz theorem regarding its positivity is proved. 2 Possibilistic EU-theory Risk appears in several economic and financial problems. The study of different topics of risk theory was done in the framework of the classical von Neumann- Morgenstern theory (=EU-theory). The central notion of EU -theory is the if X is a random variable and u : R → R is a continuous expected utility: 2 function, then the mean value M (u(X)) 1 of the random variable u(X) is the expected utility associated with X and u. For some particular forms of u the main indicators associated with X are obtained: the expected value, the vari- ance, the moments, etc. Accordingly, von Neumann-Morgenstern EU-theory has two fundamental entities: the random variable X representing the risk and the utility function u representing the decision-maker (the agent). The possibilistic EU -theory from [10], [12] starts from three basic entities: • a weighting function f : [0, 1] → R (f is a non-negative and increasing function that satisfies the condition R 1 0 f (γ)dγ = 1). • a fuzzy number A whose level sets have the form [A]γ = [a1(γ), a2(γ)] for any γ ∈ [0, 1] • a utility function u : R → R of class C2. In case of a possibilistic EU -theory risk is represented by a fuzzy number A and the utility function describes the agent. We fix a weighting function f , a fuzzy number A and a utility function u. Definition 2.1 [10], [12] The possibilistic expected utility Ef (u(A)) associated with the triple (f, A, u) is defined by: Ef (u(A)) = 1 Setting in (2.1) u = 1R (the identity function of R) we obtain the possibilistic 0 [u(a1(γ)) + u(a2(γ))]f (γ)dγ (2.1) 2 R 1 expected value ([2], [3], [10]): Ef (A) = 1 If we take in (2.1) u(x) = (x − Ef (A))2 then one obtains the possibilistic 0 [a1(γ) + a2(γ)]f (γ)dγ (2.2) 2 R 1 variance [2], [3], [10]: V arf (A) = 1 2 R 1 0 [(a1(γ) − Ef (A))2 + (a2(γ) − Ef (A))2]f (γ)dγ (2.3) Proposition 2.2 [10], [12] Let a, b ∈ R and g : R → R, h : R → R two utility functions. We denote u = ag + bh. Then for any fuzzy number A we have Ef (u(A)) = aEf (g(A)) + bEf (h(A)) (2.4) Proposition 2.3 ([10] the proof of Proposition 4.4.2, [12]) For any fuzzy num- ber A and any utility function u the following approximation formula holds: Ef (u(A)) ≈ u(Ef (A)) + 1 2 u′′(Ef (A))V arf (A) (2.5) 3 Saving in the presence of an interest-rate risk The construction of the possibilistic model for interest rate on saving from this section will have as a starting point the two optimal saving models from [8], Section 6.2, the certain model and the probabilistic model. To fix ideas we will briefly present these two models: The certain model This is a two-period consumption model build on the following entities: 1If X is a random variable (with respect to the probability space (Ω, K, P )) then we denote by M (X) its mean value and by D2(X) its variance. 3 • the consumer has the same utility function u(x) both in the first period (denoted 0) and in the second period (denoted 1); • y0 is the sure level of first-period income; • r is the interest rate for saving; • R = 1 + r > 0 is the return on saving; • s > 0 is the level of saving. As usual, one assumes that the utility function u is of class C2 and u′ > 0, u′′ < 0. The total utility function of consumption will be: U (s) = u(y0 − s) + u(s(1 + r)) = u(y0 − s) + u(sR) (3.1) The function U (s) is strictly concave. The consumer wants to determine that value s∗ of s maximizing the total utility U (s): s U (s) = U (s∗) (3.2) max The optimal saving s∗ is a solution of the first-order condition −u′(y0 − s) + Ru′(sR) = 0 (3.3) Since U ′(s) is strictly decreasing, the solution s∗ of (3.3) is unique (when it exists.) The probabilistic model In this model, instead of an interest rate for saving r we have a random variable r with M (r) = r. 2 The return of the saving will be the random variable R = 1 + r > 0. One notices that M ( R) = R. The total utility function of the model will be: V (s) = u(y0 − s) + M (u(s R)) (3.4) V (s) is also strictly concave. We denote by s∗ 1 the solution of the maximiza- tion problem max U (s). s The first order condition associated with the maximization problem will be: −u′(y0 − s) + M ( Ru′(s R)) = 0 (3.5) The (probabilistic) precautionary saving s∗ 1 − s∗ describes the variation of optimal saving when moving from the certain model to the probabilistic model. Proposition 3.1 (Rothschild and Stiglitz, [22]) If u is of class C2 and u′ > 0, u′′ < 0, then the following equivalences hold: 1 − s∗ ≥ 0; (i) s∗ (ii) − u′′′(Rs∗) u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ ≥ 2. We consider Kimball's absolute prudence index Pu(x) = − u′′′(x) u′′(x) , x ∈ R (by [16], [17]). The function RPu(x) = −x u′′′(x) u′′(x) , x ∈ R is called the relative prudence index. Then the left hand side of the inequality (ii) is exactly RPu(Rs∗). The possibilistic model We fix a weighting function f : In case of this model, the uncertainty from period 0 is no longer probabilistic, but possibilistic: interest rate for saving will be a fuzzy number B such that Ef (B) = r. The return on saving will be the fuzzy number A = 1 + B, thus Ef (A) = 1 + r = R. We will make the hypothesis that supp(A) = {x ∈ RA(x) > 0} is a [0, 1] → R. 2The other entities of the probabilistic model are the same as in the certain model. 4 subset of the interval (0, ∞). We denote by [A]γ = [a1(γ), a2(γ)], γ ∈ [0, 1] the level sets of the fuzzy number A. In rest, the entities of the possibilistic model coincide with the ones of the two models presented above. We introduce a new function v : R2 → R: v(s, x) = u(sx) (3.6) The total utility function of the possibilistic model will be: W (s) = u(y0 − s0) + Ef (v(s, A)) (3.7) Ef (v(s, A)) is the possibilistic expected utility associated with f , the fuzzy number A and the utility function v(s, .) in which s is a parameter. By (2.1), the explicit form of W (s) will be: 0 [v(s, a1(γ)) + v(s, a2(γ))]f (γ)dγ 0 [u(sa1(γ)) + u(sa2(γ))]f (γ)dγ 2 R 1 2 R 1 W (s) = u(y0 − s) + 1 = u(y0 − s) + 1 From (3.6) one obtains ∂v(s,x) ∂s = xu′(sx) (3.8) ∂s2 = x2u′′(sx) < 0 (3.9) ∂ 2v(s,x) 2 R 1 Deriving the explicit form of W (s) one obtains: W ′(s) = −u′(y0 − s) + 1 By (3.8), W ′(s) is written as follows: W ′(s) = −u′(y0 − s) + Ef [ ∂v(s,A) An analogous calculation leads to W ′′(s) = u′′(y0 − s) + Ef [ ∂ 2v(s,A) In formula (3.10), Ef [ ∂v(s,A) ] (3.11) ] (3.10) ∂s ∂s 0 [a1(γ)u′(sa1(γ)) + a2(γ)u′(sa2(γ))]f (γ)dγ ∂s2 ] is the possibilistic expected utility associated with f , A and the utility function ∂v(s,.) ] is the pos- sibilistic expected utility associated with f , A and the utility function ∂ 2v(s,.) , and in (3.11) Ef [ ∂ 2v(s,A) ∂s2 ∂s . ∂s2 Proposition 3.2 The total utility function W is strictly concave. Proof. By hypothesis, u′′ < 0 and (3.9), (3.11) it follows W ′′(s) < 0 for any s. In case of the possibilistic model, the consumer wishes to obtain the solution s∗∗ of the optimization problem: W (s) (3.12) max The optimal saving s∗∗ will be the solution of the first-order condition s W ′(s) = 0. By (3.10), the first-order condition W ′(s) = 0 is written: −u′(y0 − s) + Ef [ ∂v(s,A) ∂s ] = 0 (3.13) 4 The possibilistic precautionary saving We recall from the previous section that s∗ is the optimal saving for the certain model, s∗ 1 is the optimal saving for the probabilistic model, and s∗∗ is the optimal saving for the possibilistic model (3.12). According to the first-order conditions (3.3) and (3.14) the following equalities hold: u′(y0 − s∗) = Ru′(s∗R) (4.1) 5 u′(y0 − s∗∗) = Ef [ ∂v(s∗∗,A) The difference s∗∗ − s∗, called possibilistic precautionary saving, represents the variation of optimal saving when moving from the certain model (3.1) to the possibilistic model (3.13). ] (4.2) ∂s The following proposition is the possibilistic version of the Rothschild and Stiglitz (see Proposition 3.1). Proposition 4.1 Assume that the utility function u is of class C3 and u′ > 0, u′′ < 0. Then the following assertions are equivalent: (a) s∗∗ − s∗ ≥ 0; (b) − u′′′(Rs∗) u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ ≥ 2. Proof. By Proposition 3.2, the derivative W ′ of the total utility W is a strictly decreasing function. Then, taking into account that W ′(s∗∗) = 0, the following equivalence holds: ∂s ] (4.4) ∂s = xu′(s∗x) (4.5) s∗∗ ≥ s∗ iff 0 = W ′(s∗∗) ≤ W ′(s∗) (4.3) From (3.10) one obtains W ′(s∗) = −u′(y0 − s∗) + Ef [ ∂v(s∗,A) We consider the following function: h(x) = ∂v(s∗,x) Then h′(x) = u′(s∗x) + s∗xu′′(s∗x) (4.6) h′′(x) = s∗[2u′′(s∗x) + xs∗u′′′(s∗x)] (4.7) We apply Proposition 2.3 to the function h and the fuzzy number A: Ef (h(A)) ≈ h(Ef (A)) + 1 2 h′′(Ef (A))V arf (A). Since Ef (A) = R and Ef (h(A)) = Ef [ ∂v(s∗,A) ], the previous approximation ∂s formula becomes: 2 ∂s ∂s ] ≈ h(R) + 1 2 h′′(R)V arf (A) s∗[2u′′(s∗R) + Rs∗u′′′(s∗R)] (4.8) Ef [ ∂v(s∗,A) Taking into account (4.5) and (4.7) Ef [ ∂v(s∗,A) ] ≈ Ru′(s∗R) + V arf (A) Replacing in (4.4) it follows W ′(s∗) ≈ −u′(y0 − s∗) + Ru′(s∗R) + V arf (A) Taking into account (4.1), the previous formula becomes: W ′(s∗) ≈ V arf (A) But V arf (A) > 0 and s∗ > 0 by hypothesis, thus 0 ≤ W ′(s∗) iff 2u′′(s∗R) + s∗Ru′′′(s∗R) ≥ 0 (4.10) Taking into account that u′′(s∗R) < 0, from the equivalences (4.3) and (4.10) s∗[2u′′(s∗R) + Rs∗u′′′(s∗R)] (4.9) s∗[2u′′(s∗R) + Rs∗u′′′(s∗R)] 2 2 it follows immediately s∗∗ ≥ s∗ iff − u′′′(Rs∗) u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ ≥ 2. Remark 4.2 The assertions (a), (b) from Proposition 4.1 remain equivalent when the inequalities are replaced by strict inequalities: s∗∗−s∗ > 0 iff − u′′′(Rs∗) 2. u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ > 6 Remark 4.3 The condition s∗∗ −s∗ > 0 means that the presence of possibilistic interest-rate risk in an optimal saving model draws by itself the increase in the optimal saving level (we will say that the possibilistic interest-rate generates an extra-saving). One notices that condition (ii) from Proposition 3.1 coincides with condition (b) from Proposition 4.1. Combining the two propositions, the following result is obtained: Corollary 4.4 Assume that u is of class C3 and u′ > 0, u′′ < 0. Then the following assertions are equivalent: (a) s∗∗ − s∗ ≥ 0 (resp. s∗∗ − s∗ > 0); (b) s∗ (c) − u′′′(Rs∗) 1 − s∗ ≥ 0 (resp. s∗ u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ ≥ 2 (resp. − u′′′(Rs∗) 1 − s∗ > 0); u′′(Rs∗) Rs∗ > 2). By the previous corollary, the probabilistic interest-rate risk generates an extra-saving if and only if the possibilistic interest-rate risk generates an extra- saving. One asks how to compare the optimal saving s∗ 1 (corresponding to the prob- abilistic model) with the optimal saving s∗∗ (corresponding to the possibilistic model). Proposition 4.5 Assume that u is of class C3 and u′ > 0, u′′ < 0. Then the following assertions are equivalent: (i) s∗∗ ≥ s∗ 1; (ii) [2u′′(s∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 1R)][V arf (A) − D2( R)] ≥ 0. Proof. From (3.10) and (3.5) it follows that the optimal saving s∗ following equalities: 1 satisfies the 1 ,A) ] (4.11) 1) + Ef [ ∂v(s∗ ∂s R)] (4.12) 1 1) = −u′(y0 − s∗ 1) = M [ Ru′(s∗ 1 iff 0 ≤ W ′(s∗∗) ≤ W ′(s∗ W ′(s∗ u′(y0 − s∗ By Proposition 3.2, W ′ will be a strictly decreasing function. Then s∗∗ ≥ s∗ Taking into account (4.12), equality (4.11) becomes: W ′(s∗ Taking into account (4.8) we will have the approximation formula: Ef [ ∂v(s∗ For the computation of the other term of the sum from (4.14) we consider 1) = −M [ Ru′(s∗ 1R) + V arf (A) R)] + Ef [ ∂v(s∗ 1R)] (4.15) ] ≈ Ru′(s∗ s∗ 1[2u′′(s∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 1) (4.13) 1 ,A) ∂s 1 1 ,A) ∂s ] (4.14) 2 the following function: 1x) (4.16) g(x) = xu′(s∗ A simple computation shows that g ′′(x) = s∗ Applying to g the second-order Taylor approximation, the known approxi- 1x)] (4.17) 1x) + xs∗ 1[2u′′(s∗ 1u′′′(s∗ mation formula is obtained: M [ Ru′(s∗ R)] = M [g( R)] ≈ g(M ( R)) + 1 1 Since M ( R) = R from (4.18) one obtains: 2 g ′′(M ( R))D2( R) (4.18) 7 R)] ≈ g(R) + g′′(R) 2 D2( R) (4.19) M [ Ru′(s∗ 1 From (4.16), (4.17) and (4.19) we find the approximation M [ Ru′(s∗ 1 Using (4.14), (4.15) and (4.20) it follows W ′(s∗ Since s∗ 1R) + D2( R) R)] ≈ Ru′(s∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 2 [2u′′(s∗ 1) ≈ s∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 2 1 1R)][V arf (A) − D2( R)] (4.21) s∗ 1[2u′′(s∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 1R)] (4.20) 1 > 0, from (4.13) and (4.20) the equivalence of conditions (i) and (ii) follows immediately. Remark 4.6 The assertions (i), (ii) from Proposition 4.5 remain equivalent if we replace the inequality by strict inequality. Condition s∗∗ > s∗ 1 expresses the fact that moving from the probabilistic optimal saving model to the possibilistic optimal saving model, an extra-saving is obtained. Corollary 4.7 Under the conditions of Proposition 4.5, the following are equiv- alent: (i) s∗∗ > s∗ 1; (ii) The disjunction of the following assertions holds: (ii1) − u′′′(Rs∗ 1 ) 1 ) Rs∗ (ii2) − u′′′(Rs∗ 1 ) 1 ) Rs∗ 1 > 2 and V arf (A) > D2( R) 1 < 2 and V arf (A) < D2( R) u′′(Rs∗ u′′(Rs∗ Proof. From Proposition 4.5 and Remark 4.6, it follows that s∗∗ > s∗ only if the disjunction of the following assertions is true: 1 if and (a) 2u′′(s∗ (b) 2u′′(s∗ Taking into account that u′′(s∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 1R) + Rs∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 1u′′′(s∗ 1R) > 0 and V arf (A) − D2( R) > 0. 1R) < 0 and V arf (A) − D2( R) < 0. 1R) > 0 1 > 2 thus the assertions (a) and (ii1) are equivalent. Similarly, 1R) < 0 it follows 2u′′(s∗ 1R)+Rs∗ 1u′′′(s∗ iff − u′′′(Rs∗ 1 ) 1 ) Rs∗ u′′(Rs∗ the assertions (b) and (ii2) are equivalent. Remark 4.8 By Corollary 4.7, the fact that moving from the optimal saving model with probabilistic risk to the optimal saving model with possibilistic risk generated an extra-saving is characterized by inequalities expressed in terms of (probabilistic and possibilistic) relative prudence index − u′′′(Rs∗ 1 ) 1 ) Rs∗ 1 and the u′′(Rs∗ variances Ef (A) and D2( R). Example 4.9 Assume that the consumer's utility function is of type CRRA: u(x) = x1−γ 1−γ for any x > 0 (γ is a parameter with the property γ > 0 and γ 6= 1). Then the relative prudence index is RPu(x) = γ + 1, for any x (see [8], p.99). Applying Remark 4.2 to this case, the possibilistic interest-rate risk A gen- erates an extra-saving if and only if γ > 1. 8 We fix the weighting function f (t) = 2t, for t ∈ [0, 1]. Assume that 0 < c < d. We consider the fuzzy number A with a1(γ) = c, a2(γ) = d for any t ∈ [0, 1] and R the uniformly distributed random variable on the interval [c, d]. A simple computation shows that R = Ef (A) = M ( R) = c+d 2 ; V arf (A) = (c−d)2 Noticing that V arf (A) < D2( R), by applying Corollary 4.7 it follows that ; D2( R) = (c−d)2 4 . 12 s∗∗ > s∗ 1 if and only if γ < 1. 5 Concluding Remarks Using the notion of possibilistic expected utility from [12], in this paper an optimal saving model is built in which an interest rate risk modeled by a fuzzy number is present. Two main results are proved: • a necessary and sufficient condition for the presence of a possibilistic in- terest rate risk to generate an extra-saving; • the comparison of optimal saving levels corresponding to two models with different descriptions of the probabilistic interest-rate risk model from [21] and the possibilistic model from this paper. The first result can be seen as a possibilistic version of a Rothschild and Stiglitz theorem from [21]. We mention a few open problems: (1) The study of possibilistic models of optimal saving in which to appear both labor income risk and interest rate risk, one of them in probabilistic form (random variable), the other in possibilistic form (fuzzy number); (2) Continuing the research from the paper [14] by studying some possibilistic and mixed models of optimal saving inspired from the models from papers [15], [24]. These models will be obtained as combinations of four types of possibilistic risk: labor income risk, wealth risk, asset risk and capital risk; (3) Building some optimal saving models in a larger possibilistic frame, such as the one provided by expected utility operators (see [10], Chapter 5). References [1] D. Baiardi, M. Magnani, M. Menegatti, Precautionary saving under many risks, Journal of Economics, 113, issue 3, 2014, 211-228 [2] C. Carlsson, R. Full´er, On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 122, 2001, 315 -- 326 [3] C. Carlsson, R. Full´er, Possibility for Decision, Springer, 2011 [4] A. M. Lucia-Casademunt, I. Georgescu, Connecting possibilistic prudence and optimal saving, International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2(4), 2013, 38-45 9 [5] C. Courbage, B. Rey, Precautionary saving in the presence of other risks, Economic Theory, 32, 2007, 417-424 [6] J. Dr`eze, F. Modigliani, Consumption decision under uncertainty, J. Eco- nomic Theory, 5, 1972, 308-355 [7] D. Dubois, H. Prade, Possibility Theory, Plenum Press, New York, 1988 [8] L. Eeckhoudt, C. Gollier, H. Schlesinger, Economic and Financial Decision under Risk, Princeton University Press, 2005 [9] L. Eekhoudt, H. Schlesinger, Changes in risk and the demand for saving, Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 55 (7), 2008, 1329-1336 [10] I. Georgescu, Possibility Theory and the Risk, Springer, 2012 [11] I. Georgescu, Possibilistic risk aversion, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 60, 2009, 2608 -- 2619 [12] I. Georgescu, A possibilistic approach to risk aversion, Soft Computing, 15, 2011, 795 -- 801 [13] I. Georgescu, Risk aversion, prudence and mixed optimal saving models, Kybernetika, 50(5), 2014, 706-724 [14] I. Georgescu, J. Kinnunen, Mixed models for risk aversion, optimal saving, and prudence, Fuzzy Economic Review, The International Association for Fuzzy-Set Management and Economy, 21(2), 2016, 47-70 [15] J. W. Gunning, Risk and saving: a taxonomy, Economics Letters, 107(1), 2010, 39-41 [16] M. S. Kimball, Precautionary saving in the small and in the large, Econo- metrica, 58, 1990, pp. 53 -- 73 [17] M. S. Kimball, Precautionary Motives for Holding Assets, New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance, (London: MacMillan Press: 1992) and (New York: Stockton Publishers: 1992), Volume 3, pp. 158-161 [18] H. Leland, Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 1968, 465-473 [19] J. Li, Precautionary saving in the presence of labor income and interest rate risks, Journal of Economics, 106, 2012, 251-266 [20] M. Magnani, A new interpretation of the condition for precautionary sav- ing in the presence of an interest-rate risk, Journal of Economics, 120, 2017, 79-87 [21] M. Magnani, M. Menegatti, Precautionary saving and changes in risk correlation, Economics Bulletin, 35(1), 2015, 561-570 10 [22] M. Rothschild, J. Stiglitz, Increasing risk II: economic consequences, Jour- nal of Economic Theory, 3, 1971, 66-84 [23] A. Sandmo, The effect of uncertainty on saving decisions, Rev. Economic Studies, 37, 1970, 353-360 [24] M. Vergara, Precautionary saving: a taxonomy of prudence, Economics Letters, 15, 2007, 18-20 [25] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 1978, 3-28 11
1911.02918	1	1911	2019-11-07T14:11:44	Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures	[ "econ.TH" ]	Two extensive game structures with imperfect information are said to be behaviorally equivalent if they share the same map (up to relabelings) from profiles of structurally reduced strategies to induced terminal paths. We show that this is the case if and only if one can be transformed into the other through a composition of two elementary transformations, commonly known as \textquotedblleft Interchanging of Simultaneous Moves\textquotedblright\ and \textquotedblleft Coalescing Moves/Sequential Agent Splitting.\textquotedblright	econ.TH	econ	BEHAVIORAL EQUIVALENCE OF EXTENSIVE GAME STRUCTURES PIERPAOLO BATTIGALLI, PAOLO LEONETTI, AND FABIO MACCHERONI Abstract. Two extensive game structures with imperfect information are said to be behav- iorally equivalent if they share the same map (up to relabelings) from profiles of structurally reduced strategies to induced terminal paths. We show that this is the case if and only if one can be transformed into the other through a composition of two elementary trans- formations, commonly known as "Interchanging of Simultaneous Moves" and "Coalescing Moves/Sequential Agent Splitting." 1. Introduction i and s′′ i and s′′ Fix a player, viz. player i, in the extensive-form representation of a finite game. Say that two strategies s′ i of player i are behaviorally equivalent if they are consistent with (do not prevent from being reached) the same collection of information sets of player i and behave in the same way at such information sets. Two strategies s′ i are realization-equivalent if, for every given strategy profile s−i of the opponents (including the chance player), s′ i and s′′ induce the same play path, or terminal node (of course, the induced terminal node may i depend on s−i). Kuhn proved that these two equivalence relations coincide, see [15, Theorem 1]. Intuitively, two strategies of player i are equivalent in this sense, if they respond in the same way to information about other players, but may respond in different ways to past moves of i. This corresponds to a notion of "forward planning," such as planning the sequence of actions to be taken in a one-person game (without chance moves). For this reason, some authors call "plan of action" such an equivalence class of strategies, cf. [19, Section 6.4] and [25]. Several authors studying the foundations of game theory put forward solution concepts that do not distinguish between behaviorally equivalent strategies. Such solution concepts rely on the following notion of sequential best reply. For each of his information sets, player i has a probabilistic belief about the strategies of the opponents and the resulting system of beliefs satisfies the rules of conditional probability whenever they apply. A strategy s⋆ is a sequential best reply i to such system of beliefs if, for each information set of i reachable under s⋆ i , there is no alternative strategy that yields a higher expected utility given the belief at such information set. Different notions of "extensive-form rationalizability" put forward and applied in the last four decades (e.g., Pearce [20], Ben Porath [5], Battigalli [2], Battigalli and Siniscalchi [4]) rely on this notion of sequential best reply and therefore do not distinguish between behaviorally equivalent strategies. These solution concepts have been rigorously justified by explicit and formal assumptions about strategic reasoning. See, for example, the surveys of Battigalli and Bonanno [3], and Dekel and Siniscalchi [8], the textbook of Perea [22], and JEL code. C72. Key words and phrases. Extensive game structure; behavioral equivalence; invariant transformations. 9 1 0 2 v o N 7 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 8 1 9 2 0 . 1 1 9 1 : v i X r a 2 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni the relevant references therein for rigorous and transparent epistemic justifications of these solution concepts.1 Since behavioral and realization equivalence coincide, if two strategies are behaviorally equivalent, they are necessarily payoff equivalent; but it is easy to show by example that the converse is not true (see below). Thus, behavioral equivalence, sequential best reply, and the related solution concepts are not normal-form invariant. It is also clear from the definition of behavioral equivalence and its coincidence with realization equivalence that the only relevant part of a game in extensive form that matters to ascertain such equivalence is the game structure (that is, the game tree with the information structure), not the map from terminal nodes to consequences, or payoffs. Call a class of behaviorally equivalent strategies a structurally reduced strategy. A transformation of a game structure preserves behavioral equivalence if, up to relabeling, the new game structure has the same set of structurally reduced strategies for each player, the same set of terminal nodes, and the same map from profiles of structurally reduced strategies to terminal nodes as the initial game structure. In this case, we say that two game structures are behaviorally equivalent. As anticipated, the notions of realization equivalence and behavioral equivalence are related to, but distinct from payoff equivalence of strategies in a game, and normal-form equivalence of two games in extensive form. The latter relations can be defined only for fully specified games whereby each terminal node is associated with a corresponding profile of payoffs. Two behaviorally equivalent strategies are necessarily payoff equivalent, that is, independently of how the co-players' behavior is fixed, they yield the same profile of payoffs. But the possibility of ties between terminal nodes implies that the converse is not true. The standard notion of equivalence between games requires the same map (up to relabeling) between profiles of classes of payoff equivalent strategies and payoff profiles. If we assign the same payoff functions (up to relabeling of terminal nodes) to two behaviorally equivalent game structures, we obtain two games in extensive form that are equivalent in the (less demanding) traditional sense, that is, they have the same reduced normal form. But such traditional equivalence may also hold between non behaviorally equivalent games. For example, a (non trivial) 2-person game with perfect information and a game with (essentially) simultaneous moves with the same normal form are not behaviorally equivalent. Since there are well-known and relevant solution concepts that are not normal-form invari- ant, but yield the same solutions (up to relabeling) for games with the same structure and the same payoff functions, we find it interesting to provide a characterization of behavioral equiv- alence by means of invariant transformations. We consider a class of extensive-form structures allowing a direct representation of simultaneous moves whereby more than one player may be active at a given node; see, e.g., [19, Section 6.3.2]. Therefore, besides the standard transfor- mation of "Interchanging" essentially simultaneous, but formally sequential moves, we apply a "Simultanizing" transformation that makes such moves truly simultaneous. We also consider the standard transformation of "Coalescing Moves" and its inverse, that is, "Sequential Agent 1There are also extensive-form refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept, such as Reny's explicable equilibrium [24] that do not distinguish between behaviorally equivalent strategies. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 3 Splitting" (see the examples below). With this, we prove the following result: Two finite game structures G and G′ are behaviorally equivalent if and only if there is a sequence of trans- formations of the "Interchanging/Simultanizing" kind and "Coalescing Moves" kind and their inverses that connects G with G′. Example 1. Consider player 1 in the extensive game structures G and G′ represented in Figure 1. Neither the consequence function nor the preference relations over the set of ter- minal nodes {z1, z2, z3} are specified. In particular, the "normal-form" representations will be defined as maps from strategy profiles to terminal nodes. It has been argued that player 1 should regard G and G′ as representing "essentially" the same situation, if his preferences over {z1, z2, z3} are the same. In particular, strategies x.a and x.b are behaviorally equivalent and the set {x.a, x.b} gives the structurally reduced strategy x, representing the "plan" of reaching z1, whereas y.a (resp. y.b) corresponds to the plan of reaching z2 (resp. z3). Thus, G and G′ have isomorphic sets (of cardinality 3) of structurally reduced strategies, where the isomorphism preserves the map from reduced strategies to terminal nodes. 1 x y z1 1 a b x z1 1 a b z2 z3 z2 z3 Figure 1. Example of Coalescing Moves. Example 2. The two game structures in Figure 2 feature imperfect information. In both cases players 1 and 2 move sequentially and the second mover cannot observe the move of the first, which is represented by joining with a dashed line the nodes where the second mover is active, but the order of moves is interchanged. x b z2 2 a z1 1 y a z3 2 b z4 2 a y 1 b x 1 z3 z2 x z1 y z4 Figure 2. Example of Interchanging/Simultanizing. It has been argued that these two structures represent "essentially" the same situation. 4 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni 1.1. Literature. The standard literature on game equivalence aims at characterizing classes of games with the same reduced normal form by means of invariant transformations. The first work on game equivalence is Thompson [28], who defines four transformations commonly known as "Interchanging of Simultaneous Moves," "Coalescing Moves/Sequential Agent Split- ting," "Addition of a Superfluous Move," and "Inflation/Deflation." Relying on the simplifica- tion of Krentel, McKinsey, and Quine [13] and the extensive-game model proposed by Kuhn [14], he shows that, up to relabelings, two finite games share the same reduced normal form if and only if each extensive form representation can be transformed into the other through a finite number of applications of these transformations (see also [7]). A few later contributions extended Thompson's work. In particular, Kohlberg and Mertens [12] extend the above result to games with chance moves, proposing two additional transfor- mations which are, essentially, modified versions of Coalescing Moves and Addition of Super- fluous Moves for the chance player. They argue that all the "strategic features" are unchanged through the application of these transformations. Elmes and Reny [9] point out that one of these transformations, Inflation/Deflation, does not preserve the perfect recall property. Hence, given a modified version of the Addition of a Superfluous Move transformation, they show that two extensive form games with the same reduced normal form can be transformed into each other without using the unwanted transformation, and preserving the perfect recall property. This is, in our view, conceptually appealing, because whether players have perfect or imperfect recall should be part of the description of their personal traits (like their sub- jective preferences), not of the objective rules of the game. Such rules should describe the objective "flow" of information to players. Assuming that players are necessarily informed of the actions they just chose, the objectively accumulated "stock" of information is represented by information partitions with the perfect recall property, see also Section 2.3. Other notions of game equivalence have been studied in the literature. For example, Hoshi and Isaac [11] extend Thompson's result to the case of games with unawareness. Bonanno [6] investigates the notion of game equivalence which arises from the iterated application of Interchanging of Simultaneous Moves only, showing that the resulting equivalence classes correspond to set- theoretic reductions. Goranko [10] takes a linguistic approach, gives an axiomatization of the algebra of games and defines canonical forms so that every game term is provably equivalent to a minimal canonical one. Lastly, van Benthem, Bezhanishvili, and Enqvist [29] look at equivalence from the perspective of the players' power for controlling outcomes. Compared to most of this literature, we differ in two ways. First, we consider a differ- ent set of transformations, which just apply to the extensive form structure, irrespective of the outcome function.2 Second, our formal language is somewhat different. In particular, for us actions, rather than nodes, are the primitive terms; furthermore, we provide a direct representation of simultaneity. The latter is in principle important, because two games with different sequences of "essentially simultaneous" moves are not necessarily viewed as equivalent by the players. For example, only the first mover can be afraid (or hopeful) of being spied on. More generally, we can cleanly represent incomplete information about the order of moves 2In this respect, our work is similar to Bonanno [6]. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 5 and the information structure as in [21], whereas the representation à la Kuhn [15] would be cumbersome. 2. Preliminaries on Game structures 2.1. Preliminary Notation. Let (X, ≤) be a finite partially ordered set, i.e., a nonempty finite set X with a binary relation ≤ contained in X × X which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. As usual, given x, y ∈ X, we write x < y as an abbreviation of x ≤ y and x 6= y. We let [x, y] represent the order interval {v ∈ X : x ≤ v ≤ y} (hence [x, y] 6= ∅ if and only if x ≤ y) and denote the immediate predecessor relation by ≪, that is, x ≪ y with x 6= y if and only if [x, y] = {x, y}. A finite partially ordered set (X, ≤) is said to be a tree whenever there exists a (necessarily unique) minimum element e, which is called the root of the tree, and for each x ∈ X the order interval [e, x] is totally ordered. Given a nonempty set S, we denote by 2S the power set of S and by (P art(S), ≤) the collection of partitions of S. The latter is partially ordered by the refinement relation, that is, P ≤ P ′ for some partitions P, P ′ of S whenever, for each P ∈ P, there exists a sub- collection {P ′ i . In addition, we represent the set of finite sequences of elements from S by i : i ∈ I} ⊆ P ′ such that P =Si∈I P ′ S<N0 :=Sn∈N0 Sn, where S0 := {∅} is the singleton containing the empty sequence (here N0 and N stand, respec- tively, for the set of nonnegative integers and positive integers; in particular 0 ∈ N0). Accord- ingly, we define a partial order (cid:22) on S<N0 such that x (cid:22) y if and only if x = (x1, . . . , xn) ∈ Sn is a prefix of y = (y1, . . . , ym) ∈ Sm, that is, if and only if x = ∅ or 0 < n ≤ m and xi = yi for all positive integers i ≤ n. Note that ∅ (cid:22) x for all x ∈ S<N0, every nonempty order interval [x, y] is finite, hence totally ordered, and the set {v : x ≺ v (cid:22) y} has a minimum provided that x ≺ y; cf. [1, pp. 144-145]. Thus (S<N0, (cid:22)) is a tree. Here, the immediate predecessor relation is denoted by ≺≺. Recall that a complete lattice is a partially ordered set such that all subsets have both a supremum and an infimum. In particular, a complete lattice admits a greatest and a least element. Accordingly, we have the following result (we omit details). Lemma 1. Fix a finite set X. Then the partially ordered set (P art(X), ≤) is a complete lattice. In particular, for each nonempty collection {Pj : j ∈ J} of partitions of X, sup {Pj : j ∈ J} exists in P art(X). Lastly, given nonempty sets X, Y, Z, a correspondence ϕ : X ։ Y is a map that associates each x ∈ X with some possibly empty subset of Y . With this, for each y ∈ Y , we define the inverse image of y as ϕ−1(y) := {x ∈ X : y ∈ ϕ(x)} (hence, ϕ−1 is a correspondence from Y to X). Given another correspondence ψ : Y ։ Z, the composition ψ ◦ ϕ : X ։ Z is the correspondence defined by (ψ◦ϕ)(x) :=Sy∈ϕ(x) ψ(y) for all x ∈ X. Note that correspondences can be equivalently reinterpreted as binary relations (see also the comments in Section 4). 6 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni 2.2. Extensive game structures. Let G be the collection of all extensive game structures G with imperfect information and perfect recall represented by tuples hI, ¯H, (Ai, Hi)i∈I i, (1) where each primitive component will be described below (this is inspired by [19]). For brevity, we will often write "game" instead of "game structure." Hereafter, all extensive game structures are assumed to be finite and without chance moves. 2.2.1. Players. I is a nonempty finite set of players. 2.2.2. Actions. For each i ∈ I, Ai is a nonempty finite set of potentially feasible actions which can be chosen by player i. Then, we let A := [∅6=J⊆I Yi∈J Ai! denote the set of action profiles of subsets of players. 2.2.3. Histories. ¯H is the finite set of histories, i.e., a finite tree contained in (A<N0, (cid:22)) such that ∅ ∈ ¯H and closed under the immediate predecessor relation, that is, if x ≺≺ y in (A<N0, (cid:22)) and y ∈ ¯H, then x ∈ ¯H. We refer to elements of ¯H as "histories" or "nodes" as convenient. (Hence, each node in ¯H is a chain of profile of actions in A.) With this, ¯H can be partitioned in the sets of terminal histories Z and non-terminal histories H := ¯H \ Z. From the previous elements, we derive an active-player correspondence I(·) : H ։ I that associates with each h ∈ H the nonempty subset I(h) ⊆ I such that ∀a ∈ A, (h, a) ∈ ¯H =⇒ a ∈ Yi∈I(h) Ai. In addition, we assume that, for each i ∈ I, there is some h ∈ H such that i ∈ I(h), that is, Hi := {h ∈ H : i ∈ I(h)} 6= ∅. 2.2.4. Information structure. For each player i ∈ I, Hi is a partition of Hi, called the infor- mation partition of i. Moreover, we assume that the profile (Fi : H ։ Ai)i∈I of feasibility correspondences defined, for each i ∈ I, by ∀h ∈ H, Fi(h) := projAina ∈Qj∈I(h) Aj : (h, a) ∈ ¯Ho satisfies the following properties: ⋄ For each player i ∈ I and each non-terminal history h ∈ H, if Fi(h) 6= ∅, then Fi(h) ≥ 2; in the latter case, we say that i is active, otherwise he3 is inactive. 3The male pronouns (he, him, his) are used throughout this paper. We hope this won't be interpreted by anyone as an attempt to exclude females from the game or to imply their exclusion. Centuries of use have made these pronouns neutral, and we feel their use provides for clear and concise written text. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 7 ⋄ For each non-terminal history h ∈ H, the feasibility conditions of distinct players are logically independent, that is, ∀a ∈Qi∈I(h) Ai, h ≺≺ (h, a) ⇐⇒ a ∈Qi∈I(h) Fi(h). Hence, we write (h, a) := (a1, . . . , an, a) whenever h = (a1, . . . , an) ∈ H; in particular, (h, a) = (a) if h = ∅. ⋄ For each player i ∈ I, Fi is Hi-measurable, that is, ∀hi ∈ Hi, ∀h, h′ ∈ hi, Fi(h) = Fi(h′). Each element hi ∈ Hi is interpreted as an information set of player i, i.e., a maximal subset of non-terminal histories that player i is not able to distinguish. With this, it makes sense to write Fi(di) for each nonempty subset di ⊆ hi. Note that, at an information set, player i might not know who his active opponents are and their feasible actions. ⋄ For notational convenience, we assume that different information sets are associated with disjoint sets of feasible actions, that is, ∀hi, h′ i ∈ Hi, hi 6= h′ i =⇒ Fi(hi) ∩ Fi(h′ i) = ∅. (2) Lastly, for each history h ∈ ¯H, let Z(h) := {z ∈ Z : h (cid:22) z} be the set of terminal histories which follow h and, for each nonempty U ⊆ ¯H, write Z(U ) := Sh∈U Z(h). Also, for each i ∈ Fi(hi), define the set of terminal histories information set hi ∈ Hi and feasible action a⋆ which follow hi and a⋆ i as Z((h, (a⋆ i , a−i))). Z(hi, a⋆ i ) := [h∈hi [a−i∈F−i(h) The following example illustrates and explains our formalism. Example 3. Consider the extensive game structure represented in Figure 3. z1 (u, ℓ) z2 (u, r) 1,2 (d, ℓ) (d, r) 3 y z5 x z4 z3 Figure 3. An example of extensive game structure. 8 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni Here, the set of players is I = {1, 2, 3} and the set of feasible actions are A1 = {u, d}, A2 = {ℓ, r}, and A3 = {x, y}. The set of histories ¯H is partitioned into the set of terminal histories Z = {((u, ℓ)), ((u, r)), ((d, r)), ((d, ℓ), x), ((d, ℓ), y)} and non-terminal histories H = {∅, h}, where h := ((d, ℓ)). In addition, the feasibility correspondences satisfy Fi(∅) = Ai and Fi(h) = ∅ for each i ∈ {1, 2}, F3(∅) = ∅, and F3(h) = A3. Lastly, all informations sets are singletons, so that Hi = {{∅}} for each i ∈ {1, 2}, and H3 = {{h}}. Despite this, the game does not feature perfect information in the usual sense because it contains simultaneous moves by player 1 and 2 at the root. 2.3. Perfect recall. Game structures G ∈ G have to satisfy perfect recall, see [1, Definition 6.5]. This means that each player always remembers everything he knew and did earlier. Thus information sets represent the "stock" of information objectively given to a player irrespective of his cognitive abilities, which are personal features and not part of the rules of the game.4 In particular, perfect recall implies that, in each information set, two distinct histories are unrelated, i.e., ∀i ∈ I, ∀hi ∈ Hi, ∀h, h′ ∈ hi, h (cid:22) h′ =⇒ h = h′. (3) The violation of (3) is commonly known as "absent-mindedness" (see [23]). 2.4. Z-reduced normal form. For each player i ∈ I, let Si be his set of strategies, that is, Si := Yhi∈Hi Fi(hi). Similarly, S := Qi∈I Si denotes the set of strategy profiles. Each strategy profile s ∈ S determines a unique terminal history z ∈ Z.5 We denote this path function by ζ : S → Z. Accordingly, for each game structure G = hI, ¯H, (Ai, Hi)i∈I i ∈ G, we define its Z-normal form by nZ(G) := hI, (Si)i∈I , Z, ζi. Note that the Z-normal form is not graphical per se, but rather represents the game G by means of a kind of matrix. Definition 1. Fix G ∈ G as in (1) and a player i ∈ I. Two strategies si, s′ behaviorally equivalent, written as si i∼ s′ i, if i ∈ Si are ∀s−i ∈ S−i, ζ(si, s−i) = ζ(s′ i, s−i), where S−i :=Qj∈I\{i} Sj. 4We could instead describe explicitly the information flows implied by the rules of the game (as, for example, in Myerson [17]), but this would make notation heavier and proofs more convoluted. 5Players who are active at ∅ determine a unique history h1 ∈ H of length 1; if h1 ∈ Z we are done, otherwise players who are active at h1 determine a unique history h2 ∈ H of length 2; this is repeated only a finite number of times, hence the algorithm terminates. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 9 It is worth noting that this is the classical definition of realization-equivalent strategies. However, as proved by Kuhn in [15, Theorem 1], this coincides with the condition that strate- gies si, s′ i ∈ Si do not prevent from being reached the same collection of information sets in Hi and behave in the same way at such information sets. Since i∼ is an equivalence relation on Si, we can define the quotient space Si := Si/ i∼ . Elements of Si are structurally reduced strategies of player i, that is, classes of behaviorally equivalent strategies of i. Similarly, we set S :=Qi∈I Si and denote the representative of each s ∈ S by s• ∈ S. For each G ∈ G, we let its Z-reduced normal form be where ζ : S → Z is the map defined by ζ(s•) = ζ(s). rnZ(G) := hI, (Si)i∈I , Z, ζi, With this, we have all the ingredients to define the notion of behavioral equivalence for game structures. Definition 2. Two extensive game structures G, G′ ∈ G are behaviorally equivalent if they share the same Z-reduced normal form up to isomorphisms6 (i.e., rnZ(G) ≃ rnZ (G′)). In particular, the two game structures in Example 1 and the two game structures in Example 2 are, respectively, behaviorally equivalent. 3. Invariant Transformations We introduce the notion of invariant transformation: Definition 3. A correspondence T : G ։ G is said to be an invariant transformation if dom(T ) := {G ∈ G : T (G) 6= ∅} 6= ∅ and G is behaviorally equivalent to G′ for all G ∈ dom(T ) and G′ ∈ T (G). The family of invariant transformations will be denoted by T . To define the basic invariant transformations, we first need to introduce the notions of "controlling" and "dominating" sets. Intuitively, these sets are collections of histories in the same information set of an active player i that, in a sense, control suitable paths which are successors of a given set of histories h ∈ H. 3.1. Controlling and dominating sets. Fix a game structure G ∈ G as defined in (1). Definition 4. Given a player i ∈ I and two information sets hi, h′ controls hi, written i ∈ Hi, we say that h′ i whenever there exists a feasible action a⋆ i ∈ Fi(hi) such that hi ≪i h′ i , Z(hi, a⋆ i ) = Z(h′ i). (4) 6More explicitly, there exist a bijection fi : Si → S ′ i for each i ∈ I and a bijection g : Z → Z ′ such that g(ζ(s)) = ζ ′(f (s)) for all s ∈ S; here f (s) is the structurally reduced strategy profile (fi(si))i∈I ∈ S ′. 10 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni In other words, given perfect recall, hi ≪i h′ of information sets of player i,7 and the only thing i learns moving from hi to h′ chose at hi the unique action leading to h′ directed forest, given that player i has at least two actions at each information set). i (hence, h′ i follows hi in the directed forest i is that he i is an immediate follower of hi in the i means that h′ For example, the bottom information set of player 2 in the left hand side of Figure 4 controls the top information set. Remark 1. Fix i ∈ I. Given an information set hi ∈ Hi and a feasible action a⋆ is easily seen, due to perfect recall, that there is at most one h′ that hi ≪i h′ i. i ∈ Hi following action a⋆ i ∈ Fi(hi), it i such Definition 5. Given a player i ∈ I, a non-terminal history h ∈ H with i /∈ I(h), and a nonempty subset di of some information set hi ∈ Hi, we say that di dominates h, written whenever h ⋖i di, Z(h) = Z(di). In other words, h preceeds di and they have the same set of terminal successors. For example, the two nodes on the right of the information set of player 3 in the first game tree of Figure 5 dominate history (r), i.e., (r) ⋖3 {(r, a), (r, b)}. Remark 2. In the same spirit of Remark 1, fix h ∈ H and i ∈ I such that i is inactive at h. Then it is easily seen that there is at most one nonempty set di ⊆ hi ∈ Hi such that h ⋖i di. With these notions at hand, we can define two invariant transformations, which are the natural generalizations of the ones provided in Examples 1 and 2, respectively. 3.2. Coalescing Moves. We represent the so-called Coalescing Moves transformation (or, simply, Coalescing) by the correspondence γ : G ։ G, and recall that its inverse correspondence is commonly known in the literature as Sequential Agent Splitting. The domain dom(γ) := {G ∈ G : γ(G) 6= ∅} is the collection of all extensive game structures G defined by (1) for which there exist i ∈ I and information sets hi, h′ i ∈ Hi such that h′ i controls hi, that is, hi ≪i h′ i. For each G ∈ dom(γ) and hi, h′ i ∈ Hi with hi ≪i h′ i, we identity the game in γ(G) corresponding to the pair (hi, h′ i) with γ(G; hi, h′ i). Denoting by a⋆ i ∈ Fi(hi) the (unique) feasible action of the player i ∈ I for which (4) holds, the transformed game γ(G; hi, h′ i) := h I, ¯H, ( Ai, Hi)i∈ I i 7That is, hi precedes h′ i in the directed forest if, for each h′ ∈ h′ i there is h ∈ hi such that h ≺ h′. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 11 is defined as follows: • I = I; • ¯H coincides with ¯H for all histories h such that at least one of the following is satisfied: (i) there exists h′ ∈ hi such that h (cid:22) h′; (ii) h is unrelated to any h′ ∈ hi; (iii) there exist h′ ∈ hi, ai ∈ Fi(h) \ {a⋆ In the remaining cases, each history h′ ∈ ¯H such that (h, (a⋆ i , a−i)) (cid:22) h′, for some a−i ∈ F−i(h), has to be replaced in ¯H by h′ where the actions chosen by player i at the histories in the information set h′ i }, and a−i ∈ F−i(h) with (h′, (ai, a−i)) (cid:22) h. i are shifted back replacing a⋆ i ; • Aj = Aj for all j ∈ I; • denoting with h the history in γ(G; hi, h′ i) corresponding to h ∈ H, we have8 Fi(h) = Fi(hi) ∪ Fi(h′ i) \ {a⋆ i } for all h ∈ hi; otherwise Fj(h) = Fj(h). The new information sets ( Hj)j∈I are modified i are coalesced into hi. Moreover, new information accordingly. In particular, hi and h′ sets of players j ∈ I \ {i} who are active in the sub-trees with roots h ∈ hi are added, so that they are not able to observe the choices made by player i at histories h ∈ hi among the feasible actions Fi(h′ i); see, e.g., the information sets of player 3 in Figure 4 below. 1 ℓ r 2 2 a z1 b 3 a z2 b 3 x 2 y 2 x 2 y 2 p q p q p q p q z3 z4 z5 z6 z7 z8 z9 z10 1 ℓ r 2 p q a z2 2 p q γ =⇒ a z1 3 3 3 3 x y x y x y x y z3 z5 z4 z6 z7 z9 z8 z10 Figure 4. An example of the transformation "Coalescing" γ. Intuitively, the Coalescing transformation shifts all the actions in a information set h′ i of a given player i backwards to another information set hi of i controlled by the first one. Note that the histories in h′ i may "disappear" if player i was the only active i corresponding to h′ 8We recall by (2) that Fi(hi) ∩ Fi(h′ i) = ∅. 12 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni player in such histories. Note also that the equalities between action sets that appear in the definition of Coalescing are best interpreted as isomorphisms, since the meaning of actions such as p and q in Figure 4 is changed by the transformation. For example, choosing action p on the right-hand side corresponds to choosing b and p on the left-hand side. Lemma 2. Coalescing is an invariant transformation, that is, γ ∈ T . Proof. Fix G ∈ dom(γ) and consider the transformed game γ(G; hi, h′ i). For each player j ∈ I \ {i}, there is an obvious isomorphism between Sj and Sj. Moreover, there exist a bijection fi : Si → Si and a bijection g : Z → Z such that g(ζ(s)) = ζ(f (s)) for all s ∈ S, where f (s) is the structurally reduced strategy profile (fj(sj))j∈J and fj(sj) := sj for all j ∈ I \ {i}. This implies that rnZ (G) ≃ rnZ (γ(G; hi, h′ i) are behaviorally equivalent. (cid:4) i)), i.e., G and γ(G; hi, h′ 3.3. Interchanging/Simultanizing. We denote the Interchanging/Simultanizing trans- formation by the correspondence σ : G ։ G. The domain dom(σ) := {G ∈ G : σ(G) 6= ∅} is the collection of all extensive game structures G defined as in (1) for which there exist a history h ∈ H, a player i ∈ I, and an information set hi ∈ Hi with a nonempty subset di such that h ⋖i di, that is, di dominates h. For each G ∈ dom(σ), h ∈ H and di ⊆ hi ∈ Hi with h ⋖i di, we denote the game in σ(G) corresponding to the pair (h, di) with σ(G; h, di), where the transformed game is defined as follows: σ(G; h, di) := h I, ¯H, ( Ai, Hi)i∈ I i • I = I; • ¯H coincides with ¯H for all histories h′ such that either h′ (cid:22) h or h′ is unrelated to h. In the remaining cases, each history h′ ∈ ¯H such that h ≺ h′ has to be replaced in ¯H by h′ where the actions chosen by player i at the histories in di are shifted back at the last coordinate of h (this is possible since, as it been already observed after Definition 5, player i has to be inactive at h); • Aj = Aj for all j ∈ I; • denoting with h′ the history in σ(G; h, di) corresponding to h′ ∈ H, we have Fi(h) = Fi(di), and Fj( h′) = Fj(h′) in all remaining cases. The new information sets ( Hj)j∈I are modified accordingly. The position of the subset di ⊆ hi is shifted back at the last coordinate of h, all the others do not change; see e.g. the information set of player 3 in Figure 5 below. Intuitively, the Interchanging/Simultanizing transformation shifts all the actions in a subset di of an information set hi of a player i backwards to another history h dominated by di (where he is not active). In addition, as it is shown in Figure 5, di can be a proper subset of hi. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 13 1 m b 3 r a 3 ℓ 2 a 3 3 2 σ=⇒ b 3 3 ℓ 2 a 3 1 m b 3 r 2,3 (a, x) (b, y) (a, y) (b, x) x y x y x y x y x y x y x y x y z7 z8 z9 z10 z1 z2 z3 z4 z5 z6 z7 z8 z9 z10 z1 z2 z3 z4 z5 z6 Figure 5. An example of the transformation "Interchanging/Simultanizing" σ. The extensive game structure in Figure 6 provides another illustrative example: shifting back the two third-tier nodes of player 2 we get the extensive game structure in the right hand side of Figure 5. 1 m b 3 r x 2 3 y 2 ℓ 2 a 3 3 x y x y x y a b a b z1 z2 z3 z4 z5 z6 z7 z9 z8 z10 Figure 6. A σ-inverse of the game in the right hand side of Figure 5. Note that the classical "Interchanging of Simultaneous Moves" transformation used in the literature (such as the one represented in Figure 2) can be always obtained as follows: G and G′ are related by "Interchanging" if G′ ∈ σ−1(G′′), for some G′′ ∈ σ(G). Lemma 3. Interchanging/Simultanizing is an invariant transformation, that is, σ ∈ T . Proof. Fix G ∈ dom(σ) and consider the transformed game σ(G; h, di). struction that Sj is isomorphic to Sj for all j ∈ I. It follows by con- In particular, Sj is isomorphic to Sj 14 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni for all j ∈ I, so that there exist bijections fj : Sj → Sj and a bijection g : Z → Z such that g(ζ(s)) = ζ(f (s)) for all s ∈ S, where f (s) is the structurally reduced strategy profile (fj(sj))j∈I . In particular, rnZ (G) ≃ rnZ (σ(G; h, di)), i.e., G and σ(G; h, di) are behaviorally equivalent. (cid:4) Remark 3. It is immediate to see that the composition of invariant transformations is in- variant. In particular, by Lemma 2 and Lemma 3, the compositions of transformations γ and iso ∈ as inclusion up to isomorphisms. Then, a σ and their inverses are invariant. First, define transformation T : G ։ G with dom(T ) 6= ∅ is invariant provided that ∀G ∈ G, ∀G′ ∈ T (G), ∃n ∈ N0, ∃ι1, . . . , ιn ∈ {γ, γ−1, σ, σ−1}, G′ iso ∈ (ι1 ◦ · · · ◦ ιn)(G), (5) where, by convention, (ι1 ◦ · · · ◦ ιn)(G) := {G} if n = 0. 4. Characterization of Behavioral Equivalence Fix a game structure G ∈ G. Then we say that: • G has a coalescing opportunity if we can find in G two information sets hi, h′ i of the same player i such that h′ i controls hi, that is, G ∈ dom(γ); • G has a simultanizing opportunity if we can find in G a non terminal history h and a subset di of an information set of a player i (not active at h) such that di dominates h, that is, G ∈ dom(σ); • G is minimal if it has no coalescing or simultanizing opportunity, that is, In addition, G ∈ bG := G \ (dom(σ) ∪ dom(γ)). • A game structure G′ ∈ G is a reduction of G if there is a finite sequence of game structures (G1, . . . , Gn), with n ∈ N such that G1 = G, Gn = G′, and Gk+1 ∈ γ(Gk) ∪ σ(Gk) for each k = 1, . . . , n − 1; in particular, G is a reduction of G itself.9 Note that, if we interpret γ and σ as binary relations on G (with G γ G′ if G′ ∈ γ (G) and G σ G′ if G′ ∈ σ (G)) and let (γ ∪ σ)⋆ denote the transitive closure of relation γ ∪ σ, then G′ is a reduction of G if and only if G = G′ or G (γ ∪ σ)⋆ G′. With these premises, we are going to show in Lemma 5 below that each game structure G ∈ G has a unique minimal reduction. Then our main result follows: Theorem 1. For all extensive game structures G, G ∈ G, the following are equivalent: (a1) G and G′ are behaviorally equivalent; (a2) G and G′ have the same minimal reduction; (a3) G and G′ have a common reduction, up to isomorphisms; (a4) G can be transformed into G′, up to isomorphisms, through a (possibly empty) finite chain of transformations γ and σ and their inverses. 9We use the term "reduction" because, for both transformations, the height of the tree decreases (in a weak sense). In addition, note that transformation γ reduces strictly the sum of the cardinalities of the action sets of the involved player. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 15 Before we prove our characterization, note that the order on which the two transformations Indeed, as we show in Example 4, it is possible that G ∈ γ and σ are applied matters. dom(γ) ∩ dom(σ) and, at the same time, γ(G) ∩ dom(σ) = ∅. Example 4. Consider the game structure G in left hand side of Figure 7. Transformation σ may be applied to the subgame with root (t). However, considering that the bottom infor- mation set of player 1, say h1, controls {(t)}, we may apply also the γ transformation, which yields the game structure γ(G; {(t)}, h1) in the right hand side of Figure 7. It can be checked that σ cannot be applied to γ(G; {(t)}, h1), that is, γ(G; {(t)}, h1) /∈ dom(σ). 1 1 t y a z3 u z5 b z4 2 x b z2 1 a z1 a b 1 2 u z5 γ =⇒ 2 x z1 y z3 x z2 y z4 Figure 7. γ and σ are not independent. While standard reduced normal forms defined in terms of payoffs do not allow the iden- tification of a game tree, for Z-reduced normal forms we can instead identify an "essentially unique" (that is, up to isomorphisms) minimal game structure. The next result consists in obtaining such essentially unique game. that is, Lemma 4. Let bG and bG′ be two behaviorally equivalent minimal game structures. Then bG = bG′, up to isomorphisms. Proof. Let G0 be the set of extensive game structures that are behaviorally equivalent to bG, G0 :=nG ∈ G : rnZ (G) ≃ rnZ (bG)o . It is claimed that, up to isomorphisms, G0 ∩ bG is a singleton. Fix a minimal extensive game structure G0 ∈ G0 ∩ bG. First, we claim that, up to isomor- phisms, at the root of G0 there are the same active players as at the root of bG with the same By Lemma 1, for each game G and for each player i, we can define a partition P ⋆ feasible actions. i of Si as follows: P ⋆ i := supnPi ∈ P art(Si) : {ζ(Pi × S−i) : Pi ∈ Pi} ∈ P art(Z)o . (Indeed, the above collection contains {Si}, hence it is nonempty.) In other words, P ⋆ is the i finest partition of the set of structurally reduced strategies Si of player i which, independently of the profile of strategies of the opponents s−i ∈ S−i, induces a partition of the terminal histories through the map ζ. In particular, we will prove that, if i is active at ∅ (that is, (6) 16 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni i ∈ I(∅)), then the partitions of Si and Z correspond to his set of feasible actions Fi(∅); whereas if i /∈ I(∅) the partitions of Si and Z are trivial. For each player i ∈ I and information set hi ∈ Hi, define the partition Pi(hi) := {Pi(hi, ai) : ai ∈ Fi(hi)} ∈ P art(Si(hi)), (7) where Si(hi) denotes the set of structurally reduced strategies si ∈ Si which are consistent with hi, and Pi(hi, ai) denotes the set of strategies si ∈ Si(hi) which select ai at hi. Note also that Pi(hi) induces the following partition: Zi(hi) :=nζ(Pi(hi, ai) × S−i(hi)) : Pi(hi, ai) ∈ Pi(hi)o ∈ P art(Z(hi)). In particular, Zi(hi) = Pi(hi) = Fi(hi). (8) Claim 1. For each game G and for each player i, if i ∈ I(∅) then P ⋆ i 6= {Si}. Proof. Since {∅} ∈ Hi, Si({∅}) = Si, and Z({∅}) = Z, we have by (7) and (8) that Pi({∅}) ∈ P art(Si) and Zi({∅}) ∈ P art(Z). Hence P ⋆ (cid:4) i ≥ Pi({∅}) = Fi(∅) ≥ 2. Claim 2. For each game G and for each player i, if P ⋆ i that Z(hi) = Z. 6= {Si} then there exists hi ∈ Hi such Proof. We prove the claim by induction on the lenght ℓ of the longest history of the game. If the game has longest history ℓ = 1, then hi = {∅} and the thesis is obvious. Suppose that the claim holds for all games such that the lenght of their longest history is at most ℓ ∈ N. Then let G be a game structure such that the lenght of its longest history is ℓ + 1. If i ∈ I(∅) then, by Claim 1, Pi({∅}) 6= {Si} and Z({∅}) = Z. Suppose now that i /∈ I(∅). In this case, let {h(1), . . . , h(k)} be the set of histories of lenght 1 of G, so that h(j) = (a), with a ∈Qι∈I(∅) Fι(∅); also, for each j = 1, . . . , k, let G(j) be the "subgame" which starts at h(j) defined by restriction on the subtree with root h(j) (cutting the information sets, if necessary). For each j = 1, . . . , k, the lenght of the longest history in (j) G(j) is at most ℓ, and by the induction hypothesis there exists a unique information set h i of i in G(j) for which Z(h nonempty sets such that (j) i ) = Z(h(j)). Let {P1, . . . , Pm} ∈ P art(Si) be a partition of Si into {ζ(P1 × S−i), . . . , ζ(Pm × S−i)} ∈ P art(Z). Also, for each j = 1, . . . , k, let S (j) S−i consistent with history h(j). Then {ζ(P1 × S (j) follows that the union of all information sets h −i be the set of profiles of structurally reduced strategies s−i ∈ −i )} ∈ P art(Z(h(j))). It (j) i of the "subgames" G(j) is a unique information j=1 Z(h(j) (cid:4) −i ), . . . , ζ(Pm × S (j) i ) = Z. set of the original game G, so that Z(hi) =Sk Claim 3. If P ⋆ i 6= {Si} in the minimal game G0 then i ∈ I(∅). Proof. Suppose by way of contradiction that i /∈ I(∅) and P ⋆ 6= {Si}. By Claim 2, there i exists hi ∈ Hi such that Z(hi) = Z. Since i /∈ I(∅), hi 6= {∅}; furthermore, hi dominates ∅. It follows that there is a simultanizing opportunity at ∅. This contradicts the minimality of G0. (cid:4) Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 17 It follows by Claims 1, 2, and 3 that a player i ∈ I is active at the root ∅ of G0 if and only 6= {Si}. Then, we show that, if player i is active, his set of feasible actions Fi(∅) can if P ⋆ i be labeled by the elements of P ⋆ i (cf. Example 5 for an illustrative example): Claim 4. For each i ∈ I(∅) in the minimal game G0, we have Fi(∅) = P ⋆ i . Proof. Fix i ∈ I(∅). By definition P ⋆ is finer than Pi({∅}) (defined in Equation (7)), i.e., i Pi({∅}) ≤ P ⋆ i and, in particular, 2 ≤ Fi(∅) ≤ P ⋆ i . Suppose by way of contradiction that the second inequality is strict, i.e., Pi({∅}) 6= P ⋆ i . Then there exists a partition Pi ∈ P art(Si) such that {ζ(Pi × S−i) : Pi ∈ Pi} ∈ P art(Z) and Pi 6≤ Pi({∅}). In particular, Pi 6= {Si}. However, by Lemma 1, P art(Si) is a complete lattice and there exists P ′ i := sup{Pi({∅}), Pi} ∈ P art(Si). h(j) = (a), with a ∈Qι∈I(∅) Fι(∅); similarly, for each j = 1, . . . , k, let G(j) As in the proof of Claim 2, let {h(1), . . . , h(k)} be the set of histories of lenght 1 of G0, so that 0 be the "subgame" which starts at h(j) defined by restriction on the subtree with root h(j) (cutting the information sets, if necessary). Note that each G(j) 0 must be minimal like G0 (indeed, if there were a simultanizing or a coalescing opportunity in G(j) 0 , there would be also in G0). Considering that Pi({∅}) ≤ P ′ i} ∈ P art(Z), it follows that there exists j ∈ {1, . . . , k} such that the partition of the corresponding "subgame" G(j) 0 is not a singleton. Hence, by Claim 3, player i is active at the root of G(j) 0 . Thus {∅} ≪i hi, where hi is the information set of i containing h(j). Therefore there is a coaleascing opportunity at ∅. This contradicts the minimality of G0. (cid:4) i, and that {ζ(P ′ i, Pi({∅}) 6= P ′ i × S−i) : P ′ i ∈ P ′ Then, for each i ∈ I, fix P ⋆ i . For each i ∈ I(∅), P ⋆ i is the trivial partition by Claim 1, hence P ⋆ It follows that G0 (hence, also bG′) has, up to isomorphisms, the same active players at the root and the same feasible actions of bG. i ∈ P ⋆ identifies an action which is feasible at ∅. For each i /∈ I(∅), P ⋆ i = Si i indicates that no action is available at ∅. Notice that, with this, (P ⋆ i )i∈I identifies an history h of lenght 1. Consider the sub-Z-reduced normal form, where the set of strategies is restricted to P ⋆ j . With the same argument as above, for each i ∈ I, there exists an unique partition P ⋆⋆ i defined by i for each i ∈ I. Let Z ⋆ be the set of terminal histories consistent withQj∈I P ⋆ j(cid:17) : Pi ∈ Pi} ∈ P art(Z ⋆)o . Similarly, player j ∈ I is active at the history h if and only if P ⋆⋆ j } and his set of j feasible actions Fj(h) can be labeled as the elements of P ⋆⋆ j . At this point, for each player i, if two histories h′, h′′ of lenght ≤ 1 belong to the same information set of i, then they identify the same partition P ⋆⋆ (hence, by construction, the same feasible actions). Conversely, if the histories h′, h′′ identify the same partition P ⋆⋆ then by Claim 4 they belong to the same i information set. i ) : {ζ(cid:16)Pi ×Qj∈I\{i} P ⋆ := supnPi ∈ P art(P ⋆ P ⋆⋆ i of P ⋆ i 6= {P ⋆ i This algorithm can be inductively repeated, relabeling all profiles of actions of G0 by profiles of cells of partitions of each Si. By construction, with this relabeling, two histories h, h′ are on 18 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni a same information set of a player i if and only if Fi(h) = Fi(h′). This allows to reconstruct uniquely (that is, up to isomorphisms) the whole game structure G0, completing the proof. (cid:4) Lemma 5. Each extensive game structure G ∈ G has a unique minimal reduction, up to isomorphisms. Proof. Fix G ∈ G. First, we show that there exists a minimal game structure bG which is behaviorally equivalent to G. The game bG is constructed by recursive application of trans- formations γ and σ. The recursion is based on the length of histories that offer coalescing or simultanizing opportunities. Recall that we consider only finite game structures; therefore, all the collections defined below are finite as well. Basis step. Consider the root ∅, that is, the only history of length 0. Define the set C0 made by all pairs ({∅}, hi) such that {∅} ≪i hi (so that i ∈ I(∅) and {∅} ∈ Hi). Define also the set S0 made by all pairs (∅, di) such that ∅ ⋖i di (so that i /∈ I(∅)). Of course, both sets C0 and S0 are finite. Apply the transformation γ at all pairs ({∅}, hi) ∈ C0; to be precise, enu- merate the elements of C0 as ({∅}, w1), . . . , ({∅}, wk), in some order, and consider the finite sequence of games γ(G; {∅}, w1), γ(γ(G; {∅}, w1); {∅}, w′ 2) is the pair cor- responding to ({∅}, w2) in γ(G; {∅}, w1)), . . ., γ(· · · γ(γ(G; {∅}, w1); {∅}, w′ 2) · · · ; {∅}, w′ k) and note that the latter game does not depend on the chosen enumeration of C0. Then, sim- ilarly, apply the transformation σ in the latter game at the corresponding pairs (∅, di) ∈ S0 and denote the obtained game by G(1) (where G(1) = G if both C0 and S0 are empty). Note that, since all transformations are applied at the root of the game, all coalescing and simultanizing opportunities are preserved at each transformation. 2) (where ({∅}, w′ i) of the game G(n) such that hi ≪i h′ Induction Step. Suppose that G(n) has been defined for some positive integer n. Define the set Cn made by all pairs (hi, h′ i and there exists h ∈ hi with lenght n (in particular, i ∈ I(h)). Define also the set Sn made by all pairs (h, di) of the game G(n) such that h ⋖i di and h has lenght n (so that i /∈ I(h) for each such history h). Apply the transformation γ at all pairs (hi, h′ i) ∈ Cn. Then, apply the transformation σ at all pairs (h, di) ∈ Sn and denote by G(n + 1) the obtained game (where G(n + 1) = G(n) if both Cn and Sn are empty). Similarly, note that, since all transformation are applied at the same height of G(n), all coalescing and simultanizing opportunities are preserved at each transformation. By Lemma 2 and Lemma 3, G(n) is behaviorally equivalent to G for every n ≥ 1. In addition, since G is finite, there exists an integer n0 ≥ 1 such that G(n) = G(n0) for all i. Let k be the minimal lenght of histories h ∈ hi and note that k ∈ {0, 1, . . . , n0 − 1}. This implies that G(k + 1) has a coalescing oppurtinity at an information set with an history of lenght k, n ≥ n0. Set bG := G(n0). We claim that bG ∈ bG. Let us suppose by contradiction that bG ∈ dom(γ), i.e., there exists a coalescing opportunity in bG, let us say with hi ≪i h′ which contradicts our costruction. With a similar argument, we have bG /∈ dom(σ). Therefore bG is minimal, hence it is a reduction of G. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 19 To complete the proof, we need to show that bG is the unique reduction of G, up to iso- morphisms. Indeed, suppose that bG′ is another minimal game structure which is behaviorally equivalent to G. Then bG and bG′ are two behaviorally equivalent minimal game structures. It follows from Lemma 4 that bG = bG′, up to isomorphisms. Example 5. Consider the game bG ∈ bG in the right hand side of Figure 7. Its Z-reduced normal form is given in Figure 8. (cid:4) 1\2 a b u x z1 z2 z5 y z3 z4 z5 Figure 8. rnZ (bG) of the game in Figure 7. It follows from the algorithm described in Lemma 4 that player 1 is active at the root ∅ with three feasible actions, whereas player 2 is inactive at ∅ because the unique partition of {x, y} which divides the terminal paths in disjoint sets is {x, y} itself. At this point, for the sub-games starting at the histories (a) and (b), player 2 is active and the finest partition dividing the terminal paths in disjoint sets is {{x}, {y}}. It follows that player 2 is active at such histories, they are on the same information set, and he has two available actions. Finally, player 2 is inactive at the history (u). extensive game structure is represented in the right hand side of Figure 7. In other words, we constructed the game bG whose We can thus provide a characterization of invariant transformations. Lemma 6. A correspondence T : G ։ G with dom(T ) 6= ∅ is an invariant transformation if and only if it satisfies (5). Proof. By Remark 3, T contains all the correspondences T : G ։ G with dom(T ) 6= ∅ which satisfy (5). Conversely, fix an invariant transformation T and an extensive game structure G ∈ dom(T ) (which is possible, since dom(T ) 6= ∅). Then, for each G′ ∈ T (G), we have that G is behaviorally equivalent to G′, i.e., rnZ (G) ≃ rnZ(G′). By Lemma 4, there exist unique minimal game structures bG andcG′ with Z-reduced normal forms rnZ (G) and rnZ (G′), respectively. It follows by Lemma 5 that bG and cG′ are the minimal reductions of G and G′, respectively. Therefore there exist n, k ∈ N0 and ϕ1, . . . , ϕn, ψ1, . . . , ψk ∈ {γ, σ} such that bG ∈ (ϕ1 ◦ · · · ◦ ϕn)(G) k ◦ · · · ◦ ψ−1 and cG′ ∈ (ψ1 ◦ · · · ◦ ψk)(G′). 1 ◦ ϕ1 ◦ · · · ◦ ϕn)(G), so that T satisfies (5). This implies that G′ iso ∈ (ψ−1 (cid:4) Finally, we are ready to prove our main result. Proof of Theorem 1. (a1) ⇐⇒ (a2). The if part is clear. The only if part follows from Lemma 4 and Lemma 5. (a2) ⇐⇒ (a3). The only if part is clear. The if part follows from Lemma 5. 20 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni (a1) ⇐⇒ (a4). The if part is clear, cf. Remark 3. Conversely, if G is behaviorally equivalent to G′ then there exists an invariant transformation T ∈ T such that G′ ∈ T (G). By Lemma 6, T : G ։ G is a correspondence with dom(T ) 6= ∅ satisfying (5). This means that there exist n ∈ N and ι1, . . . , ιn ∈ {γ, γ−1, σ, σ−1} such that G′ iso proof. ∈ (ι1 ◦ · · · ◦ ιn)(G). This completes the (cid:4) 4.1. Concluding remarks. The four transformations put forward by Thompson [28] are the starting point for the development of many other equivalence relations. Some solution concepts, like Nash equilibrium, iterated (weak or strict) dominance, and strategic stability (Kohlberg and Mertens [12]) are invariant to transformations that preserve the reduced normal form. Others, like subgame perfection or trembling hand perfection in the agent normal form (Selten [26, 27]), are only invariant to Interchanging/Simultanizing. The latter is almost a must if games are represented in the traditional way of Kuhn [15], which does not allow for a direct representation of simultaneity, but not if the formalism allows for a direct representation It is worth noting that some solution concepts, like weak of simultaneity, as in our case. perfect Bayesian equilibrium (Myerson [18], Mas Colell et al. [16]) are not even invariant to Interchanging, as shown by Myerson [18, Figures 4.6 and 4.7]. We do not see different forms of invariance as strategic rationality requirements, but rather as interesting properties that independently justified solution concepts may or may not sat- isfy. In particular, different notions of extensive-form rationalizability with an independent epistemic foundation are based on the notion of sequential best reply described in the In- troduction, which applies to classes of behaviorally equivalent strategies. With this, we look at transformations that preserve behavioral equivalence and prove that two simple invariant transformations, i.e., Interchanging/Simultanizing and Coalescing Moves/Sequential Agent Splitting, are sufficient to characterize the notion of behavioral equivalence. 5. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the editors Giacomo Bonanno and Wiebe can der Hoek and two anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and thoughtful suggestions which improved the overall readibility of the article. The authors also thank Klaus Ritzberger (University of London) and Carlo Maria Cusumano, Nicodemo De Vito, Francesco Fabbri, David Ruiz Gomez, Paola Moscariello (Università Bocconi) for several useful comments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. References 1. C. Alós-Ferrer and K. Ritzberger, The theory of extensive form games, Springer Series in Game Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2016. 2. P. Battigalli, Rationalizability in infinite, dynamic games of incomplete information, Research Econ. 57 (2003), 1 -- 38. 3. P. Battigalli and G. Bonanno, Recent results on belief, knowledge and the epistemic foundations of game theory, Research Econ. 53 (1999), no. 2, 149 -- 225. Behavioral Equivalence of Extensive Game Structures 21 4. P. Battigalli and M. Siniscalchi, Rationalization and incomplete information, Adv. Theor. Econ. 3 (2003), Art. 3, 46. 5. E. Ben-Porath, Rationality, Nash equilibrium and backwards induction in perfect-information games, Rev. Econom. Stud. 64 (1997), no. 1, 23 -- 46. 6. G. Bonanno, Set-theoretic equivalence of extensive-form games, Internat. J. Game Theory 20 (1992), no. 4, 429 -- 447. 7. N. Dalkey, Equivalence of information patterns and essentially determinate games, Contributions to the theory of games, vol. 2, Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1953, pp. 217 -- 243. 8. E. Dekel and M. Siniscalchi, Epistemic game theory, Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applica- tions, vol. 4, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 619 -- 702. 9. S. Elmes and P. J. Reny, On the strategic equivalence of extensive form games, J. Econom. Theory 62 (1994), no. 1, 1 -- 23. 10. V. Goranko, The basic algebra of game equivalences, Studia Logica 75 (2003), no. 2, 221 -- 238, Game logic and game algebra (Helsinki, 2001). 11. T. Hoshi and A. Isaac, The strategic equivalence of games with unawareness, Logic and the Interactive Rationality (D. Grossi, L. Kurzen, and F. R. Velazquez-Quesada, eds.), Institute for Logic Language and Computation, 2010, pp. 203 -- 225. 12. E. Kohlberg and J.-F. Mertens, On the strategic stability of equilibria, Econometrica 54 (1986), no. 5, 1003 -- 1037. 13. W. D. Krentel, J. C. C. McKinsey, and W. V. Quine, A simplification of games in extensive form, Duke Math. J. 18 (1951), 885 -- 900. 14. H. W. Kuhn, Extensive games, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 36 (1950), 570 -- 576. 15. , Extensive games and the problem of information, Contributions to the theory of games, vol. 2, Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1953, pp. 193 -- 216. 16. A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green, Microeconomic theory, Oxford University Press, USA, New York, 1995. 17. R. B. Myerson, Multistage games with communication, Econometrica 54 (1986), no. 2, 323 -- 358. 18. 19. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, A course in game theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994. 20. D. G. Pearce, Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection, Econometrica 52 (1984), , Game theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991, Analysis of conflict. no. 4, 1029 -- 1050. 21. A. Penta and P. Zuazo-Garin, Rationalizability and observability, (2019), mimeo. 22. A. Perea, Epistemic game theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, Reasoning and choice. 23. M. Piccione and A. Rubinstein, On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall, vol. 20, 1997, Special issue on imperfect recall, pp. 3 -- 24. 24. P. J. Reny, Backward induction, normal form perfection and explicable equilibria, Econometrica 60 (1992), no. 3, 627 -- 649. 25. A. Rubinstein, Comments on the interpretation of game theory, Econometrica 59 (1991), no. 4, 909 -- 924. 26. R. Selten, Spieltheoretische behandlung eines oligopolmodells, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121 (1965), no. 2, 301 -- 324. 27. , Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Internat. J. Game Theory 4 (1975), no. issue 1-2, 25 -- 55. 28. F. B. Thompson, Equivalence of games in extensive form, Research memorandum / U.S. Air force, Rand Corporation, Washington D.C., 1952. 29. J. van Benthem, N. Bezhanishvili, and S. Enqvist, A new game equivalence, its logic and algebra, J. Philos. Logic 48 (2018), 649 -- 684. 22 P. Battigalli, P. Leonetti, and F. Maccheroni Università "Luigi Bocconi" -- via Roentgen 1, 20136 Milano, Italy E-mail address: [email protected] Università "Luigi Bocconi" -- via Roentgen 1, 20136 Milano, Italy E-mail address: [email protected] Università "Luigi Bocconi" -- via Roentgen 1, 20136 Milano, Italy E-mail address: [email protected]
1901.05070	1	1901	2018-12-28T13:10:11	An Inattention Model for Traveler Behavior with e-Coupons	[ "econ.TH", "stat.AP" ]	In this study, we consider traveler coupon redemption behavior from the perspective of an urban mobility service. Assuming traveler behavior is in accordance with the principle of utility maximization, we first formulate a baseline dynamical model for traveler's expected future trip sequence under the framework of Markov decision processes and from which we derive approximations of the optimal coupon redemption policy. However, we find that this baseline model cannot explain perfectly observed coupon redemption behavior of traveler for a car-sharing service. To resolve this deviation from utility-maximizing behavior, we suggest a hypothesis that travelers may not be aware of all coupons available to them. Based on this hypothesis, we formulate an inattention model on unawareness, which is complementary to the existing models of inattention, and incorporate it into the baseline model. Estimation results show that the proposed model better explains the coupon redemption dataset than the baseline model. We also conduct a simulation experiment to quantify the negative impact of unawareness on coupons' promotional effects. These results can be used by mobility service operators to design effective coupon distribution schemes in practice.	econ.TH	econ	An Inattention Model for Traveler Behavior with e-Coupons Han Qiu January 17, 2019 Abstract In this study, we consider traveler coupon redemption behavior from the perspective of an urban mobility service. Assuming traveler behavior is in accordance with the principle of utility maximization, we first formulate a baseline dynamical model for traveler's expected future trip sequence under the framework of Markov decision processes and from which we derive approxima- tions of the optimal coupon redemption policy. However, we find that this baseline model cannot explain perfectly observed coupon redemption behavior of traveler for a car-sharing service. To resolve this deviation from utility-maximizing behavior, we suggest a hypothesis that trav- elers may not be aware of all coupons available to them. Based on this hypothesis, we formulate an inattention model on unawareness, which is complementary to the existing models of inattention, and incorporate it into the baseline model. Estimation results show that the proposed model better explains the coupon redemption dataset than the baseline model. We also conduct a simulation experiment to quantify the negative impact of unawareness on coupons' promotional effects. These results can be used by mobility service operators to design effective coupon distribution schemes in practice. Keywords: inattention, Markov decision process, utility maximization 1 Introduction Recently, incentive-based demand management methods have become popular in urban mobility busi- nesses. The most well-known approach is dynamic pricing. On one hand, service operators can mitigate the shortage of supply in real time with surge pricing [9], which is first deployed by Uber on a large scale and now commonly used by ride-sharing platforms. On the other hand, operators can use real-time price discount to attract users and compete with alternative mobility services. Another commonly used tool is the coupons, which are vouchers that guarantee rights of fare reductions in consumption of products or services. Because coupons can change the fare only in the negative direction, their usage is usually limited to promotions. However, coupons are able to inform travelers about the possibility of fare reduction before they submit trip requests, while a traveler can be aware of any real-time price discount only after the service operator provides an offer. Therefore, coupons are a good complement to pricing for urban mobility service operators. Nevertheless, the impact of coupons on traveler behavior is not immediately obvious. Unlike pricing, coupons usually have long life cycles and can have complicated redemption rules. A traveler may then develop sophisticated coupon redemption policy to optimize her aggregate utility from trips. For example, when the fare of the current trip is much lower than the face value of a coupon, a traveler will defer the redemption of this coupon to a later trip. The situation becomes increasingly complex when the traveler is presented with various coupons and some coupons may have their face values, expiration dates, and redemption rules different from those of others. For example, the traveler can have one coupon that can reduce the fare of one trip for up to 5 dollars and another to reduce the fare of one trip by 20%. Moreover, in a typical urban mobility service setting, coupons are involved in several different decision problems such as the travel mode selection and the coupon selection for payment. Because 1 the service operator does not have complete information about the traveler, structural estimation of coupon impact on some decision problems is not practical. For instance, operator of one mobility service is not able to distinguish between the promotional effect in market share from her own coupon distribution strategy and the one from coupon distribution strategies of alternative mobility services. In this case, the operator can only assess the impact of coupons on the travel mode selection behavior with direct experiments on coupon distribution strategies and the result is generally not stable with respect to changes in operations of alternative mobility services. Recognizing these difficulties, in this study, we focus on travelers' coupon selection behavior. Coupon selection is a relatively simple decision problem compared with others because the decision mostly depends on the traveler's evaluation of coupons. Moreover, for this problem, we are able to acquire adequate data for model estimation. Specifically, in this study, we consider a setting in which an operator provides an urban mobility service via a mobile app and occasionally distributes electronic coupons (e-coupons) to attract travelers and to boost revenue. Moreover, to focus on the traveler behavior, we assume that travelers' decisions are independent of the operator's coupon distribution strategy. The e-coupon is in a simple format: each e-coupon can be represented by its face value and expiration date. These e-coupons are stored in an online electronic wallet (e-wallet) within the app and visually accessible only when travelers open their e-wallet. After a trip, the traveler can select up to one coupon for redemption, and a coupon can reduce the payment by subtracting from the trip fare its face value, at most. In selecting a coupon for redemption, the traveler evaluates for each coupon both its immediate redemption value and the future redemption value of the rest of coupons. To infer these evaluations, we first notice that the immediate redemption value can be obtained directly from the definition of a coupon. Then, we develop a dynamical model of trip sequences to estimate the values of future coupon redemption, because these values depend on trips happened during the life cycle of the coupon set. In particular, we view the trip generation and realization process (expected by the traveler) as a Markov decision process (MDP) and derive value approximations by assuming the utility-maximization behavior of travelers and solving for the optimal value function of the MDP. The resulting optimal policy also dictates the coupon selection behavior of a utility-maximization traveler. However, we find that the observed coupon selection behavior of travelers for a car-sharing service deviates from the above model. To explain this finding, we discuss several possibilities and finally come up with the hypothesis that travelers may not be aware of all available coupons. We then provide a mathematical formulation for such patterns of unawareness and incorporate it into the aforementioned MDP. Subsequent estimation results show that the proposed unawareness model better explains the coupon redemption dataset than baseline models. A simulation experiment further shows that if such unawareness exists the reduction rate on coupons' promotional effects can be as great as 10%. The contribution of this work is twofold. First, the proposed unawareness model is complementary to the existing models of inattention and they have completely different behavioral implications. There- fore, when existing inattention models fail to explain some dataset, one can consider the unawareness model. Second, our estimation results can be used by mobility service operators in designing effective coupon distribution schemes in practice. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we summarize related works on coupons, estimation of dynamic behavior, and limited attention. In Section 3, we formulate the dynamical model for the trip sequences and derive the optimal coupon redemption policy and the corresponding evaluation of available coupons. In Section 4, we describe the dataset from a car-sharing service and show the discrepancies between the observed coupon redemption behavior and decisions dictated by the optimal policy. In Section 5, we extend the baseline dynamical model with a mathematical formulation of unawareness. In Section 6, we summarize the estimation results of the proposed model. In Section 7, we conduct a simulation experiment to assess the impact of unawareness on the promotional effect of coupons. Finally, in Section 8, we conclude our work and suggest directions for future research. In later discussions, we use the terms "inattention" and "unawareness" interchangeably. Moreover, general inattention behavior that is not explicable by unawareness is denoted as "deliberate attention". 2 2 Literature Review 2.1 Customer behavior with coupons As a major type of price promotions, coupons have been studied in marketing literature for decades, resulting in numerous theoretical and empirical papers. Here, we provide only a brief summary of the major focus of this literature and highlight the novelty of our study. Decades ago, merchants usually designed coupons with simple redemption rules. For example, a grocery store can issue coupons for a specific product with the same face value and valid period. Given this simplicity, the optimal coupon redemption strategy is trivial to compute. Therefore, research on customer behavior at that time mainly focused on customers' coupon proneness, or the (latent) intention of obtaining and redeeming coupons. Such coupon proneness was usually estimated from socio-economic factors [5, 22, 25]. Simple redemption rules also lead to aggregate coupon redemption patterns that can be described by some elementary functions. For example, Ward and Davis [38] suggested that after coupon issuance, the coupon redemption rate declines exponentially as time passes. Inman and McAlister [21] further considered the impacts of expiration dates and extended the above model with a hyperbolic function. With the rising popularity of online shopping, merchants now prefer to use e-coupons over tradi- tional paper coupons in price promotions. This change leads to two patterns. First, because e-coupons can be distributed with low cost and in large-scale, merchants can now reach out to a large number of customers and each customer may receive coupons from a variety of merchants. Second, because the redemption of e-coupons is processed by computers rather than human beings, merchants are now able to develop complicated redemption rules. Under these patterns, the structural estimation of customer behavior with coupons becomes considerably more difficult. Therefore, recent research mostly focused on reduced-form models or even data-driven approaches. For example, Reimers and Xie [32] proposed reduced-form models for coupons' market expansion and revenue cannibalization effects. The authors estimated their models using restaurant coupon data from Groupon. Zhang et al. [39] investigated the short and long-term effects of coupon distributions on customer behavior by conducting randomized field experiments on the Taobao Marketplace, the largest online C2C platform in China. The authors applied linear models to explain their experimental findings at an aggregate level. Our work differs from the ones mentioned above in that we consider a structural model under general coupon redemption schemes. We point out that the proposed dynamical structural model is similar to the ones used in the estimation of multi-stage household consumption [8, 15]. We briefly discuss this connection in the next subsection. 2.2 Inference on temporal correlated behavior When people model real-world human behavior, they usually assume that human behaves according to the utility-maximization principle. Then, the inference problem can be reduced to a model estimation problem for the utility function. However, when the observations come from some sequential decision processes, the corresponding utility-maximizing policy needs to consider not only the utility from immediate actions but also those in the future. In this case, the connection between the (single-step) utility function and the (multiple-step) utility-maximizing policy is not immediately obvious. In the field of econometrics, such estimation problems are generally framed as the dynamic discrete choice (DDC) problems. The first practical estimation algorithm for DDC models, the nested fixed point algorithm, is proposed by Rust [33] in the 1980s to describe the engine replacement behavior of a bus company. This estimation algorithm refers to a two-stage optimization process: first, find the optimal value function V corresponding to the utility function determined by θ; then, do local searches for a better θ according to the estimates V . The huge computational burden makes this algorithm intractable for more general use, and from then on more computationally efficient algorithms, such as Hotz-Miller's conditional choice probability method [20], have been suggested. Interested readers are referred to Aguirregabiria and Mira [3] and Heckman and Navarro [16] for more details on these recent 3 developments. The estimation algorithms of dynamic discrete choice models share many similarities with the re- ward learning methods for the inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) problems. Compared with dynamic discrete choice models, these methods assume less structural knowledge of the utility (reward) function and allow for more freedom on the choice of the function form. For instance, we can use deep neural networks to capture the complex relationship between the state and the reward. However, in this case, the estimation problem is generally ill-posed [31, 40] and one needs to add other regularization or penalty terms to obtain meaningful reward functions. For example, Ziebart et al. [40] construct an entropy-regularized maximum likelihood estimator for IRL problems; Abeel and Ng [2] consider an op- timization problem to find the maximum margin hyperplane that separates the expert demonstrations from other non-optimal policies. Reward learning methods have been the major research focus of IRL problems since the last decade; however, recently, there have been more interests in methods that train policy from demonstration di- rectly. In particular, several papers [11, 12, 17] suggest that the optimal policy corresponded to the recovered reward function from a reward learning method can be viewed as the policy learned from behavioral cloning (supervised learning) of the observed behavior under the regularization con- dition uniquely determined by the same method. This interpretation is then used to develop several generative-adversarial-network (GAN) based IRL methods for simultaneous policy learning and re- ward learning, and these methods achieve better learning performance compared with state-of-the-art baselines. In this paper, we avoid the aforementioned difficulties in utility estimation by direct approximations. Specifically, we assume that the utility is additively separable: the total utility from each trip can be decomposed as the sum of the utility from coupon redemption, which is in the monetary unit and there is no need for estimation, and the unknown utility from the trip itself. Then, we show by mathematical derivation that the unknown utility from the trip can be safely ignored under certain regularity conditions. Under these assumptions, we can approximate the optimal value function of the sequential decision problem with a value determined only by the values of immediate or future coupon redemption, and the computation can be done at once before model estimations. 2.3 Limited attention and consideration set One novelty of our work is that we explicitly model the impact of unawareness in travelers' decision dynamics. In this subsection, we review the related literature on discrete choice problems under limited attention. Discrete choice problems under limited attention can generally be described by a three-stage deci- sion process [35]. First, an awareness subset is drawn from the whole choice set by chance. Then the decision maker (DM) deliberately limits her attention to a consideration subset of the awareness set. Finally, the DM makes a choice within the consideration set. Most works in the literature focus only on the second stage, i.e. the generation of a consideration set, possibly limited by available data or by the problems with identification. Recently, theoretical works, including the one of Masatlioglu et al. [30], introduced frameworks that viewed the awareness set and the consideration set as an individual object. However, as illustrated later in this paper, these two terms should not be used interchangeably in a dynamic decision model because they are generated according to different mechanisms. In particular, the generation of an awareness set is an action taken by nature and needed to be explicitly modeled with the dynamical model, whereas the generation of an consideration set is an action taken by the DM and is implicitly modeled in a class of decision strategies(policies). In this study, we specifically focus on the modeling of the former. The modeling of discrete choice problems under limited attention started in the 1970s [27]. At that time, researchers were interested in theoretically attractive extensions of classic discrete choice models, e.g., the multinomial logit (MNL) model. As an initial work, Manski [27] introduced a random set model, in which each choice is independently considered for attention. The computational complexity of this model scales with the power of the choice set size because the consideration set can be any 4 subset of the whole choice set. This model is referred to as the "Manski model" in the discussion below. Later, Swait and Ben-Akiva [37] developed the parameterized logit captivity (PLC) model, in which the consideration set can either be the whole choice set or contain a single choice option. Empirical works [6, 37] showed that these models had better explanatory power than the pure MNL model. Since the last two decades, customers have been able to browse and purchase an increasing number of products either online or via mobile apps, thanks to the developments of information technology. With very large choice sets, consumers exhibit decision patterns that deviate much from rationality but can possibly be explained by limited attention. Consequently, there had been rising interests in understanding and exploiting such behavior, and we witnessed a burgeoning number of empirical works on consideration sets. For example, Chiang et al. [10] estimated a random-parameter extension of the Manski model using data on households' choices among four ketchup brands. Goeree [14] estimated the Manski model using data on customer choices among personal computer products in the US. Honka [18] applied the concept of searching costs to develop an attention model and estimated it using a dataset of customer choices among automobile insurance products in the US. Honka et al. [19] further extended the above model by including the Manski model for the awareness set generation. The authors estimated the resulting model using data on customer choices among bank accounts in the US. All of these works claimed that the inclusion of the set consideration stage leads to better specifications and estimation results. At the same time, other scholars kept progressing in the theoretical development of the limited attention mechanism. Manzini and Mariotti [28], Masatlioglu et al. [30], and Abaluck and Adams [1] focused on the axiomatic formulation of the consideration set, aiming at extending the current preference theory. Sims [36], Kim et al. [23], and Gabaix [13] considered information costs in the DM's search for choice options and developed models of rational inattention. Masatlioglu and Nakajima [29] and Seiler[34] further extended these optimization models of option searching into dynamic decision processes. For a comprehensive summary of recent theoretical developments, interested readers are referred to the recent work by Masatlioglu et al. [30]. Restricted by application scenarios, the modeling of consideration sets had only been applied for traveler mode choice or location choice behavior in the transportation literature. For example, Swait and Ben-Akiva [37] estimated the PLC model using travel mode choice data in Sao-Paulo, Brazil. Ba¸sar and Bhat [4] estimated the Manski model using data on passenger choices among four airports in the San Francisco Bay Area. Mahmoud et al. [26] estimated the PLC model with a dataset of travel mode choices in the city of Toronto. Our inattention model is distinct from the above models in two aspects. First, we consider behavior under limited attention in a dynamic decision process. Second, we pay more attention to the generation of awareness sets than to the generation of consideration sets. Simulation results in later sections show that such modeling differences actually lead to important practical implications. 3 Baseline Model In this section, we formulate a dynamical model for trip sequences to derive the utility-maximizing coupon redemption policy and the corresponding evaluation of available coupons. Without loss of generality, in following discussions we always assume that utilities are in the monetary unit. The model formulation is decomposed into two parts. First, we specify the temporal correlation between consecutive trips. In particular, we model the trip generation process as a discrete time dynamical system with the available coupon set being the only state variable that keeps changing across trips. Secondly, we construct a structural model for individual trips. Specifically, we view an individual trip as a combination of two stages: the travel mode selection stage and the coupon selection stage. The overall structure of the dynamical model is described in Figure 1. One should notice that not all elements in this figure are observable from our perspective; for instance, a trip will be observed only if the target mobility service is chosen. Next, we summarize several general assumptions about the dynamical model that mentioned ex- 5 Figure 1: Structure of the dynamical model for trip sequences plicitly earlier in this paper. Assumption 1. (a) Each coupon is represented by its face value and expiration date and can be used freely before expiration. However, for each payment at most one coupon can be redeemed, and the final trip fare must be nonnegative (that is, the reduction in fare cannot exceed the fare itself ). (b) The traveler only considers trip events for the future; therefore, the traveler has no expectation on future coupon arrivals. Later in Section 4, we will show that both assumptions are reasonable for our dataset. 3.1 Notation of coupons Before proceeding to the model formulation, we first discuss the notations of coupons. A coupon c consists of a face value v and the remaining time to expire T , whereas an available coupon set includes many coupons. However, directly modeling coupon set C as a set of coupons {c1,··· , cm} does not always work here, because a mathematical "set" requires its every element to be distinct, but a traveler usually has several coupons with the same v and T . To overcome this difficulty, we model coupons in groups: c = (cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105) ∈ R × N × N +, where n is the number of coupons in the group. A coupon set C can then be defined as a finite set of coupon groups C = {c1,··· , cm} ⊂ R × N × N +, which is subject to the restriction that any two coupon groups ci, cj in C cannot have the same characteristics (v, T ). Moreover, the coupon set C should always include the option of selecting no coupon; here, this default option is represented by a coupon group of zero-valued coupons c0 = (cid:104)0, 0, 1(cid:105). We further define C0 as the default set {c0}. We use C to represent the set of all possible coupon sets. However, given C = {c1,··· , cm} and ci = (cid:104)vi, Ti, ni(cid:105), we can characterize Ca as follows: Ca = {ca I a} ∈ C, where the index set I a ⊂ {1, 2,··· , m}, and coupon group ca We use A(C) to denote the set of all possible subsets Ca of C. Now, a natural subset Ca of the coupon set C is not necessarily a mathematical subset of C. i i ∈ i ≤ ni. i = (cid:104)vi, Ti, na i (cid:105) with 0 < na 3.2 Temporal correlation among trips A simple way to describe a trip sequence is to discretize the time into steps according to a unit t0 and allocate each trip to a time step. For example, we can generate the trip for traveler j in a time 6 t … 0 n n+1 n+2 n+3 21 trip 1 trip 2 trip 3 state transitions estimated trip details X travel mode selection realized trip details X' coupon selection if chooses the target service 22 23 at the start of the trip at the end of the trip step according to a Bernoulli distribution B(1, λj) (the probability of having a trip demand in each time step is λj) and assuming trips from different time steps are generated independently. However, the selection of an appropriate time unit t0 is not trivial in general: on one hand, when t0 is large, e.g., t0 = 1 week, it is unlikely that a traveler has no more than one trip within a time step; on the other hand, when t0 is small, e.g., t0 = 1 minute, a trip can last for many time steps and the temporal correlation between consecutive time steps can be strong. For instance, a traveler who just finished a trip 10 mins ago is less likely to submit a trip request now. Also, the computation complexity of modeling trip sequences within a specific time range is inverse proportional to t0 and can lead to practical problems when t0 is very small. A more natural model of trip sequences is to consider a continuous time setting and use stochastic processes for trip generation. For example, Poisson processes generalize the independent Bernoulli sampling process in the discrete time setting. However, this model also suffers from strong temporal correlations among trips and huge computation complexity. In fact, this model is closely related to discrete time models with very small t0, as shown in Appendix A. Because the ultimate purpose in this section is to derive practical estimations of the future re- demption value of coupons, here we choose to use a larger time unit t0 to reduce the modeling and computation complexities. In particular, we want to select a large enough t0 such that the following assumption holds: Assumption 2. For any mode i, the realized trip time t(cid:48) xi ≤ t0. (cid:48) xi is always upper bounded by the time unit t0 t (1) This assumption says that a trip cannot last more than a time step. With this assumption, we avoid the difficulty in modeling heterogeneous state transitions across time. For urban mobility services, a t0 greater than three hours is generally adequate for Assumption 2 to hold. In subsequent discussion, we always assume t0 = 1 day and write t0 = 1 for short. One cost of selecting a large t0 is that we will underestimate the total number of trips and, therefore, the value of future coupon redemption. Luckily, as will be shown later in Section 4, for our dataset most of the travelers are low-frequency users of the car-sharing service; therefore the underestimation of future coupon redemption values is not a severe problem. Next we discuss the trip generation process in each time step. First, define λj,t as the probability of traveler j having a trip demand in time step t. In general, λj,t depends on all the past information (λj,t−1,··· , λj,0, Sj,t−1,··· , Sj,0), in which Sj,t is state variables for j at time t. However, inclusion of these past information into the trip generation process leads to several practical issues: trips served by alternative modes are not observed, so the past information for λj,t is always incomplete; even if we have complete information, the dependency can be highly nonlinear, which leads to a difficult estimation procedure and unstable predictions into the future. Therefore, we make the following assumption for simplification: Assumption 3. Trip generation rate λj,t does not rely on any past trip of traveler j and is fixed as λj. In practice, we can let λj be traveler j's average trip generation rate. Intuitively, the estimation of coupon redemption value from this approximation is reasonable when both the real λj,t does not differ much from λj and the time range T in consideration is large. In summary, in this study we consider a discrete time setting for trip generations, in which the time unit t0 is 1 day and the probability of having a trip demand in each time step is a traveler-specific constant λj. Finally, we discuss the state transition of the available coupon set C between consecutive trips. C is updated in two steps: first, if there is a coupon redemption c (cid:54)= c0, the used coupon c is removed from the set C; secondly, every remaining coupon c(cid:48) in the set C becomes one-time-unit closer to expiration. This updating procedure is described by the following state transition function f and coupon group 7 transition function fc: f (C, c) = {fc(c (cid:48) (cid:48) ∈ C/{c}} ∪ {fc((cid:104)v, T, n − 1(cid:105))} )c (cid:40)(cid:104)v, T − 1, n(cid:105) c0 fc((cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105)) = v, n > 0, T ≥ 1 otherwise (2) where we assume that c = (cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105). Notice that in general cases the update of time to expiration T depends on tx; here the homogeneity is ensured by Assumption 2. When there is no coupon selection, the state transition is described by f (C, c0). For simplicity, we use f (C) to represent this default state transition f (C, c0). 3.3 Model of an individual trip In the following formulation, we limit our discussion to a specific traveler j. First, we simplify the interaction between the traveler and the target mobility service in an indi- vidual trip as follows: at the beginning of a trip, the traveler decides which travel mode to use and whether to cancel the trip. If the traveler selects a mode, she sticks with her choice until she arrives at the destination. Upon arrival, the traveler proceeds to payment and if she selects the target mobility service, she can decide which coupon to use. The trip ends after the payment. In other words, we decompose an individual trip into two stages: travel mode selection and coupon selection. In the stage of travel mode selection, the detail of the trip demand X, including the trip distance and the current traffic situation, is revealed to the traveler. Without loss of generality, we use a traveler-specific distribution Pj(·) to describe the generation of X. Moreover, following the same logic as the discussion on λj in the last subsection, we make the following assumption: Assumption 4. Distribution Pj(·) does not rely on any past trip of traveler j. Given X, the traveler selects a travel mode or cancels the trip according to a traveler-specific policy πxj and the mode-specific information such as available coupons for different mobility services. Without loss of generality, let us assume that the potential travel modes are indexed as 0, 1,··· , nj, where 0 corresponds to trip cancellation and 1 corresponds to the target mobility service. The probability of selecting mode i can then be described as P (i) = πxj(iX, I0,··· , Inj ), (3) where Ii captures all private information about mode i of traveler j. Because the specific selection probabilities P (0), P (2),··· , P (nj) are not available to us, our dis- cussion on the travel mode selection is restricted to the event {i = 1} (whether the target mobility service is selected). Moreover, because we do not have the information I0, I2,··· , Inj , we need the following assumption for subsequent developments: Assumption 5. Information on the alternatives I0, I2,··· , Inj are invariant among trips for any traveler j. We also make an assumption to simplify the form of I1: Assumption 6. Information on the target mobility service I1 can be fully described by the available coupon set C; other factors, such as the service quality, are assumed to be invariant among trips for any traveler j. Later in Section 4, we will show that both assumptions 5 and 6 can be partly justified for our dataset. Next, we make an assumption to simplify the form of the traveler's decision policy πxj: 8 Assumption 7. In selecting a travel mode, the traveler evaluates the utility uij(X, Ii) ∈ R for each mode i and her decision depends exclusively on these utilities; that is, the policy πxj has the following form πxj(iX, I0,··· , Inj ) = πxj(iu0j(X, I0),··· , unj j(X, Inj )). The above three assumptions immediately lead us to the form πxj(iX, C) = πxj(iu0j(X), u1j(X, C),··· , unj j(X)); (4) (5) to simplify notations, in following discussion we use uxij to denote uij(X) and uxj to denote {ux0j,··· , uxnj j}. The next assumption is crucial for the computational tractability of our subsequent analysis. Assumption 8. The utility from taking the target mobility service u1j(X, C) is the sum of the utility from the service itself ux1j and the utility from potential coupon redemption u(px, C), where px ∈ R+ is the estimated trip fare with the target mobility service. In summary, with above simplifications, the travel mode selection policy now reduces to P (i = 1) = πxj(px, uxj, C) (6) Next, we consider the stage of coupon selections. Assumption 1(a) restricts the action space of the traveler and the traveler's decision can now be interpreted as a probability distribution over the set of available coupons. Without loss of generality, the coupon selection probability can be expressed as P (c) = πc(cX(cid:48), C), where πc is the coupon selection policy and X(cid:48) captures the realized trip details. In j(·X). subsequent discussion we use distribution P (cid:48) Because the traveler cannot distinguish among coupons in the same group c, we make the following j to describe the generation of X(cid:48) from X: X(cid:48) ∼ P (cid:48) assumption to simplify the form of πc: Assumption 9. The traveler makes selection in two steps. First, she selects one coupon group c from her available coupon set C according to policy πc: P (c) = πc(cX(cid:48), C). Then, she chooses a coupon c from this group c. x,(cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105)) = min(v, p(cid:48) Next we simplify the form of X(cid:48) in πc. To make an optimal decision, the traveler needs to evaluate both the utility from immediate redemption and the one from future redemption. On one hand, by definition the value r of redeeming a coupon in the group (cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105) given the realized trip fare p(cid:48) x is r(p(cid:48) x). On the other hand, because of assumptions 3 and 4 the utility of future redemption does not depend on the details X(cid:48) of the current trip. Therefore, we can make the following assumption: Assumption 10. In the coupon selection stage the traveler only consider the realized trip fare p(cid:48) the coupon set C for decision; that is, πc(cX(cid:48), C) = πc(cp(cid:48) x and x, C). 3.4 Value functions and approximations In this subsection, we derive optimal policy and value function of the above dynamical model and develop practical approximations to characterize travelers' coupon redemption behavior. Suppose that the mode choice policy πxj and the coupon redemption policy πc are given. Since our model includes several stages, to make subsequent discussions clearer, we introduce following definitions: U π(C) is the expected utility gain from the target mobility service and coupon set C at the beginning of the time step and is called the "ex ante utility"; U π xj(px, uxj, C) is the expected c (p(cid:48) utility gain after the revealing of trip demand details and is called the "interim utility"; U π x, C) is the expected utility gain at the end of trip realization stage and is called the "ex post utility". First, depending on whether there is a trip in the time step, the realized ex ante utility U π(C) equals to either the ex ante utility at the next time step U π(f (C)), or the expected interim utility EXPj U π xj(px, uxj, C): U π(C) = (1 − λj)γU π(f (C)) + λjEXPj U π xj(px, uxj, C), (7) 9 where γ is the time discount factor for a time step. Next, depending on whether the target mobility service is selected, the realized interim utility U π xj(px, uxj, C) equals to either the sum of utility from alternatives and the ex ante utility at the next time step U π(f (C)), or the sum of utility from the target mobility service ux1j and the expected ex post utility EX(cid:48)X,P (cid:48) (cid:88) = (1 − πxj(px, uxj, C))[ux1j + γU π(f (C))] + πxj(px, uxj, C)[ux1j + EX(cid:48)X,P (cid:48) P (i)[uxij + γU π(f (C))] + P (i = 1)[ux1j + EX(cid:48)X,P (cid:48) (cid:48) c (p x, C)] xj(px, uxj, C) = c (p(cid:48) U π x, C): (cid:48) x, C)], c (p U π i(cid:54)=1 U π U π j j j (8) i(cid:54)=1 P (i)uxij and can be interpreted as the expected utility where the value ux1j is equal to from taking alternative mobility services. Since we do not have any specific information on each of alternative i, we assume that the value of ux1j is independent from the selection probability of the target mobility service P (1). Now, if we define the utility gain from taking the target mobility service uxj = ux1j − ux1j, we have 1−P (1) 1 (cid:80) xj(px, uxj, C) = (1 − πxj(px, uxj, C))γU π(f (C)) + πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X,P (cid:48) U π (cid:48) x, C)] + ux1j, c (p (9) x, C) equals to different ex ante utility at the next time step, U π j c (p(cid:48) Finally, the ex post utility U π depending on which coupon the traveler selects to redeem: U π c (p (cid:48) x, C) = πc(cp (cid:48) x, C)[r(p (cid:48) x, c) + γU π(f (C, c))]. (10) (cid:88) c∈C For notational simplicity, in following discussion we use EX to replace EXPj and EX(cid:48) to replace EX(cid:48)X,P (cid:48) . j We next show that the above formulation leads to a technical problem and cannot be applied In fact, we can derive the following corollary by simply replacing the coupon set C in directly. equations (7), (9) and (10) with the default set C0: Corollary 1. We have U π(C0) = 1 1 − γ λjEX [ux1j + πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj]. (11) The detailed proof is provided in Appendix B. This corollary says that when the time discount factor γ is closed to 1, the ex ante utility U π(C0) depends critically on γ and can be very large. However, this is often the case in the real world context: for example, if we let the yearly discount factor be 0.9, the discount factor for a day is then 0.9997. Because the utility gain contributed by coupon redemption is bounded by finite numbers, e.g., the sum of values of all coupons in the set, the estimation of coupon impacts, or the difference among U π(C) with different C, can be numerically unstable. To achieve regularity in formulations and to reduce numerical instability, we simply subtract the value of U π(C0) from every U π(C), as illustrated in the following proposition: Proposition 1. If we define V π(C) as U π(C) − U π(C0) and V π we have c (p(cid:48) x, C) as U π c (p(cid:48) x, C) − U π c (p(cid:48) x, C0), V π(C) = γV π(f (C)) + λjEX{ (cid:88) c∈C πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X V π x, C) − γV π(f (C))] − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}, (cid:48) c (p V π c (p (cid:48) x, C) = πc(cp (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + γV π(f (C, c))], x, C)[r(p (12) V π(C0) = 0. 10 The proof of proposition 1 can be found in Appendix B. The new variable V π(C) can be interpreted as the net utility gain from the coupon set. In the following discussion, we call V π(C) the "ex ante value function" and V π x, C) the "ex post value function". As we already tackle the regularity problem with proposition 1, in the following exposition we always assume γ = 1. From Equations (7), (9), (10), and (12) it is not hard to derive the form of the optimal policies π∗ and π∗ c (p(cid:48) c xj c (cp (cid:48) ∗ x, C) = I(c = arg max c∈C π ∗ xj(ty, uxj, C) = π π ∗ xj(ty, uxj, C) = I(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V {r(p (cid:48) ∗ x, c) + V x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ c (p (f (C, c))}), (f (C)) ≥ 0), ∗ (13) and the corresponding optimal value functions V ∗ and V ∗ c V ∗ (cid:48) x, C) = max c (p c∈C ∗ ∗ V ∗ (C) = V (C0) = 0, V ∗ (cid:48) x, c) + V {r(p (f (C)) + λjEX [max(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V (f (C, c))}, x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ c (p ∗ (f (C)), 0) − max(uxj, 0)], (14) where I(·) is the indicator function: I(X) = 1 if and only if the statement X is true. distributions Pj, P (cid:48) and upper bounds of V ∗ as follows. One more technical problem remains. To compute V ∗ exactly, we need to know parameter λj and j accurately. This is not possible for observers like us; luckily, we can derive lower Proposition 2. Consider V L(C) = V L(f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) xC0 I(x = 1)[V L c (p (cid:48) V L x, C) = max c (p c∈C (cid:48) x, c) + V L(f (C, c))]; [r(p V U (C) = V U (f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) xCI(x = 1)[V U c (p (cid:48) V U x, C) = max c (p c∈C (cid:48) x, c) + V U (f (C, c))], [r(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, C) − V L(f (C))], (cid:48) x, C) − V U (f (C))], (cid:48) (15) with V L(C0) = V U (C0) = 0 and x(cid:48) being the binary indicator of whether there is a trip served by the target mobility service within the time step. We have V L(C) ≤ V ∗(C) ≤ V U (C) for all C ∈ C. The proof of proposition 2 can be found in Appendix B. One important property of these ap- j do not show up explicitly in Equation (15). Therefore, we can x from data. This proximations is that λj, Pj, and P (cid:48) approximate V L and V U with the estimation of the joint distribution of x(cid:48) and p(cid:48) leads to the following approximation of V ∗: V (C) = V (f (C)) + λjEp(cid:48) (cid:48) Vc(p x, C) = max c∈C (cid:48) x, c) + V (f (C, c))], [r(p x Pj x, C) − V (f (C))], (cid:48) [ Vc(p (16) V (C0) = 0. where λj is the estimated service selection probability P (x(cid:48) = 1) and Pj is the estimated marginal distribution of fare p(cid:48) x. We point out that the formulation (16) is the most natural way to estimate the long-term value of coupons given only information on λj and Pj. Therefore, the arduous deductions above mostly provide a sanity check that the straightforward modeling approach (16) is indeed valid under certain regular conditions. Next, we use a simple example to illustrate how we can practically compute V with equation (16). This method can be generalized to the computation of value functions in equations (14) and (15). 11 Example 1. Consider a setting in which the service selection rate is λj = 0.05 and the fare x) ∼ N (3.15, 0.752). Assume now the traveler has two available distribution Pj can be described as log(p(cid:48) coupons C = {(cid:104)5, 3, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)10, 2, 1(cid:105)}. First, we enumerate all coupon sets that are possible in the future. Under the current simpli- fied setting, the complete list can be given explicitly: C0, {c0,(cid:104)5, 1, 1(cid:105)}, {c0,(cid:104)5, 2, 1(cid:105)}, {c0,(cid:104)10, 1, 1(cid:105)}, {c0,(cid:104)5, 2, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)10, 1, 1(cid:105)}. Next, we compute V (C(cid:48)) for each possible C(cid:48). We begin with C(cid:48) = {c0,(cid:104)5, 1, 1(cid:105)}; since f (C(cid:48)) = C0, with equation (16) we have (cid:48) (cid:48) Vc(p x, C (cid:48) V (C ) = max (cid:48) c∈C(cid:48) r(p x, c) = min(p x Pj Vc(p ) = λjEp(cid:48) (cid:48) x, 5), (cid:48) x, C) = 0.05Ep(cid:48) (cid:48) x∼N (3.15,0.752) min(p x, 5), (17) where the expectation in the second equation can then be computed numerically by sampling methods. Usually, direct sampling with 1,000 samples are enough for a good accuracy, but one can use more advanced methods such as importance sampling to improve computation efficiency. Similarly, we can compute C(cid:48) = {c0,(cid:104)10, 1, 1(cid:105)} directly. Then, we illustrate how to compute C(cid:48) = {c0,(cid:104)5, 2, 1(cid:105)}. We first notice that value V (f (C(cid:48))) = V ({c0,(cid:104)5, 1, 1(cid:105)}) is already available according to the above computations. We now apply equation (16) again and have (cid:48) Vc(p x, C V (C (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) x, 5), V (f (C ) = max(min(p ) = V (f (C = V (f (C )) + λjEp(cid:48) x Pj )) + 0.05Ep(cid:48) (cid:48) (cid:48) ))), x, C) − V (f (C (cid:48) [ Vc(p (cid:48) ))] x, 5) − V (f (C (cid:48) x∼N (3.15,0.752) max(min(p (18) (cid:48) )), 0), which can then be evaluated by sampling methods. Finally, one can notice that by using the same approach, we can compute the value of V (C) by sampling methods when we know the value V (f (C, c)) for every c ∈ C. Since the transition f is (cid:3) unidirectional in time, this method is always feasible by backward deduction. The next example shows that when coupons have small promotional effects on the service selection x, C) − V ∗(f (C)) is much smaller than rate P (x(cid:48) = 1) (e.g., the utility gain from coupons EX(cid:48)X V ∗ the utility gain from trips uxj), bounds V L and V U are close to each other and therefore V is a fairly accurate approximation. Example 2. Consider a setting in which the default service selection rate P (x(cid:48) = 1C0) = 0.05, ∂V P (x(cid:48) = 1) = 0.01, x) ∼ N (3.15, 0.752). Suppose now the traveler has a set of coupons the derivative of the service selection rate with respect to the coupon value ∂ and the fare distribution log(p(cid:48) C = {c0,(cid:104)10, 30, 2(cid:105),(cid:104)10, 15, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)5, 20, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)20, 5, 1(cid:105)}. c (p(cid:48) Figure 2 shows the estimated value functions: the subfigure (a) shows the traveler's value functions V U (f (T )(C)) and V L(f (T )(C)) with respect to time T and the coupon set C; the subfigure (b) shows the differences in value functions ∆V = V (f (T )(C)) − V (f (T−1)(f (C, c))) with respect to the coupon group c = (cid:104)10, 30, 2(cid:105) for both V L and V U . From both subfigures, we can see that the gap between the (cid:3) upper bound and the lower bound is small. Before ending this subsection we point out another implication of equation (15) on the error struc- If we assume rationality from the ture in estimations of the traveler's coupon selection behavior. traveler, the coupon choice probability P (cp(cid:48) x, C), from the perspective of the observer, is P (cp (cid:48) x, C) = EV DI(c = arg max c∈C {r(p x, c) + V (f (C, c))}), (cid:48) (19) where V is estimates of the optimal value function V ∗ given data D. In specifying the error structure of V , people usually assume the additive separability V = V + εV , and that εV is normally distributed (probit model) or follows Gumbel (Type-I extreme) distribution (logit model). The major reason for such choices is to obtain tractable analytic forms of the choice probability P (cp(cid:48) x, C). However, because 12 (a) V (b) ∆V Figure 2: Value function approximations Figure 3: Daily order volume and number of registered travelers in our model the value V has both an upper bound V U and a lower bound V L, our specification of εV should have bounded support. Specifications with probit or logit models can lead to erroneous results. 4 Data and Observations 4.1 Data description Our data comes from a car-sharing service in Shanghai, China and is collected during the period from January 2017 to July 2017. The dataset includes activities from 0.16 million registered travelers and contains more than 1.5 million trip records. Figure 3 shows that both the daily order volume and the number of registered travelers increased steadily during the period, but the daily order volume per traveler exhibited significant changes in its pattern on April 1st and June 10th. Such changes are due to external events including the announcement of a new pricing scheme and summer holidays. Since these external events potentially result in changes of traveler behavior, to avoid estimation bias we focus on the stable period from April 2017 to June 2017 in the discussion below. We notice that the stability of operation during the concerned period indicates that there is no significant change in the operations of alternative travel modes and traveler's preference of the target mobility service, and partly justifies our previous assumptions 5 and 6. 13 051015202530T024681012141618valueVUVL051015202530T0.00.51.01.52.0valueVUVLMar 1stApr 1stMay 1stJun 1stJul 1st9.09.29.49.69.810.0log(users/10)log(orders)(a) Trip quantities of users (b) Trip fare Figure 4: Distribution of major statistics From part (a) of Figure 4 we can see that most of the registered travelers are infrequent users of the car-sharing service: more than 80% of them use the service less than once a week. Therefore, for most travelers, the temporal correlation of trips between consecutive days is weak, and our choice of time step size (1 day) is acceptable. Next, we briefly introduce the coupon distribution mechanism adopted by this car-sharing service during the period from April 2017 to June 2017. Recall that we only model the impact of coupons in general forms in previous sections; however, the specific coupon distribution and redemption process can influence how travelers perceive the existence of coupons and therefore shape the distribution of the observed data. First, when the operator wants to give a traveler j a coupon c, she adds this coupon into the traveler's e-wallet at the server side. Later, when the traveler opens or refreshes her app, the app communicates with the remote server and updates the local e-wallet record. However, this update information does not pop up automatically on the main screen. Secondly, during the trip requesting stage, the coupon information, such as how many coupons the traveler has currently, does not show up automatically, although the traveler can check her e-wallet at any time. The traveler is able to redeem a coupon only when she finishes a trip and is in the payment stage; however, coupon redemption is not made a default option, and to redeem a coupon the traveler has to open her e-wallet from the payment panel and make an explicit selection. All these interaction designs make the coupon redemption process less obvious for the travelers. During the concerned period, all the coupons distributed by the service operator are of the same type: each coupon can be used freely before expiration and can reduce the trip fare by at most its face value. This is in accordance with assumption 1. Moreover, there are only four distinct face values: 5, 10, 20, and 30. The valid period of a coupon can be as short as 3 days or as long as 90 days. Finally, the operator does not employ any sophisticated coupon distribution strategy during the concerned period. The operation team distributes coupons manually and the pattern is highly un- predictable due to a changing budget constraint. Moreover, this coupon distribution process does not differentiate between frequent and infrequent travelers. Therefore, the arrival of coupons can be viewed as a random exogenous event and we do not consider it in our model. 4.2 Data processing The raw dataset consists of order and coupon records: each order record consists of details of a trip completed via the car-sharing service, and each coupon record includes a coupon's face value, start date, expiration date, and corresponding traveler. Table 1 summarizes the data fields used in our study. consists of three categories of features: trip details, including realized fare p(cid:48) This raw dataset is processed for the subsequent coupon selection analysis. The processed dataset x and redeemed coupon c 14 020406080100trip quantity (in 180 days)0.00.20.40.60.81.0cumulative probabilityobservationslog normalgammaexponentialtrip fare0.00.20.40.60.81.0cumulative probabilityobservationslog normalgammaexponentialType Order order ID, (encrypted) traveler ID, trip start time, trip end time, fare, used coupon ID, payment Fields Coupon coupon ID, (encrypted) traveler ID, coupon face value, start time, expire time Table 1: Data fields (along with its coupon group c); coupon details, including available coupon set C and coupon attention state Ia (which will be discussed in next subsection); and traveler-specific details, including average daily trip frequency with the car-sharing service λ, and average and standard deviation of the logarithm of the trip fares µp, σp. The latter two are used to construct the empirical marginal distribution of trip fare Pj: log(p(cid:48) pj). We choose the log-normal distribution because it adequately matches the empirical distribution of trip fares, as shown in part (b) of Figure 4 (the fare details are removed from this figure per request of the service operator). The available coupon set C for each trip order is recovered from the coupon records. More specifically, we track the life cycle of each coupon c and append it to the set C when it is still alive. x) ∼ N (µpj, σ2 Because our major concern in this study is the coupon selection behavior, we remove records in which the coupon set is empty (C = C0). The final dataset on coupon selection contains more than 0.36 million records and approximately 0.08 million of them have only one coupon in the set C. As a reference, the dataset constructed from all available data contains more than 0.9 million records and 0.23 million of them have only one coupon in C. 4.3 Observations on the coupon redemption behavior In this subsection, we discuss several observations from the coupon selection data and introduce a few hypotheses for explanations. First, consider the case in which the traveler has only one coupon. On one hand, from equation x ≥ v and there are temporal (14) we know that the optimal value V ∗ is upper bounded by v. So if p(cid:48) discounting effects, the expected value from future redemption is strictly smaller than the value of immediate redemption, v, and a utility-maximizing traveler should always redeem the coupon. On the x ≥ v is consistently lower than 1, as shown other hand, the observed coupon redemption ratio when p(cid:48) in Figure 5. In Figure 5, we group data with different p(cid:48) x/v with a granularity of 0.2 and each point on the curve represents the statistics of the data from the group on its left: for example, point at p(cid:48) x/v = 1 and v = 5 represents statistics for all data with 0.8 ≤ p(cid:48) x/v < 1, v = 5, and point at p(cid:48) x/v = 1.2 and v = 10 summarize statistics for all data with 1 ≤ p(cid:48) x/v < 1.2, v = 10, etc. Figure 5: Ratio of coupon redemption v.s. fare-value ratio, cases with only one coupon Next, we consider the case in which there is a coupon (cid:104)v, T(cid:105) in the available coupon set C such x ≥ v. By the same argument as above, we expect to observe that the that the trip fare p(cid:48) coupon redemption ratio equals to 1 in this case. However, this is not true for the observed data, x satisfies p(cid:48) 15 0.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.752.00px/v0.00.20.40.60.81.0ratio of coupon redemptionv=5v=10v=20v=30as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 shows the relationship between the coupon quantity and the coupon redemption ratio of the observed data. From part (a), we can see that the coupon redemption ratio is consistently below 1. Nevertheless, this gap diminishes as the coupon quantity increases. From part (b-c) we further observe that traveler specific factors such as past experiences and trip frequencies also have strong impacts on the coupon redemption ratio. (a) Overall (b) By experience (c) By frequency Figure 6: Ratio of coupon redemption v.s. coupon quantity, cases in which some coupon face values v exceed fare p(cid:48) x Now, we introduce several hypotheses to explain the above observations. We limit our attention to approaches in two directions: either to relax the optimality assumption or to examine and redefine the decision problem that the traveler optimizes. We point out that the deviation from optimality in the cases with only one coupon greatly limits our choices in the first direction. In situations that the traveler has only one coupon, the traveler is con- fronted with much easier decision problems compared with general cases. Models on the computation complexity of the decision problem, such as those on bounded rationalities or deliberate attention, then imply that decisions in the cases with only one coupon are more likely to follow the optimal decision π∗. However, above observations show that the deviation is the greatest in this setting. One possible option in this direction is to consider near-optimal stochastic policies, such as the entropy-regularized optimal policy πH [40] x, C) ∝ exp[r(p πH,c(cp (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + V πH (f (C, c))]. (20) Clearly stochastic policies such as πH can explain a coupon redemption ratio below 1 when we have x ≥ v. However, coupon redemption ratios from such policies are sensitive to the coupon value v, at p(cid:48) least in the cases with only one coupon. We can illustrate the intuition of this claim by looking at equation (32): given the same λj, Pj and T , one can show by induction on T that the gap between v and V (v, T ) increases monotonically as v increases. Therefore, the redemption ratio under the condition 16 246810coupon quantity0.700.750.800.850.900.95ratio of coupon redemptionobservationsy=1−0.4/x246810coupon quantity0.60.70.80.9ratio of coupon redemptionNe=1Ne∈[2,3]Ne∈[4,7]Ne∈[8,15]Ne∈[16,31]246810coupon quantity0.650.700.750.800.850.900.95ratio of coupon redemptionγ∈[e−5,e−4)γ∈[e−4,e−3)γ∈[e−3,e−2)γ∈[e−2,e−1)γ∈[e−1,e−0)x/v ≥ 1 should also increase monotonically with v. However, this is not fully consistent with our p(cid:48) observations in Figure 5: the redemption ratio under v = 30 is not significantly greater than the one under v = 20. We can follow the discussion above and keep searching for the "correct" policy; however, in this process we need to make more assumptions and the generalization power of our results diminishes. Next, we consider approaches in the second direction: the decision problem faced by the traveler is different from the one in our model. For our specific problem of coupon selections, we further assume that such difference comes from the knowledge of the available coupon set C. As discussed in previous sections, the operator does not provide much information about the arrival of coupons, so there are possibilities that the traveler has only partial knowledge of C. To identify variables that capture the traveler's knowledge of C, we recall that a traveler can be aware of a coupon c only when she opens her e-wallet during the coupon's life cycle. Since one motivation of such action is to use a coupon for payment, we consider the following variable: "activation record" Ia(c) ∈ {0, 1} of coupon c, which equals to 1 if and only if there is a past realized trip, after which the traveler selected a coupon c(cid:48) (cid:54)= c for payment and coupon c was in the e-wallet at that time. We now examine explanation power of Ia on the aforementioned deviations. Figure 7 shows the relationship between p(cid:48) x/v and the coupon redemption ratio in cases that the traveler has only one coupon c and the coupon satisfies Ia(c) = 1. Figure 8 shows the relationship between the coupon quantity and the coupon redemption ratio in cases that there is a coupon c = (cid:104)v, T(cid:105) in the available x ≥ v and Ia(c) = 1. From both figures, we can coupon set C such that the trip fare p(cid:48) see that the coupon redemption ratio becomes much closer to 1 when we impose the restriction on Ia. Moreover, part (b-c) of Figure 8 indicates that the impact of past experience and trip frequency diminishes under the same restriction. x satisfies p(cid:48) Figure 7: Ratio of coupon redemption v.s. fare-value ratio, cases with only one coupon, Ia(c) = 1 17 0.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.752.00px/v0.00.20.40.60.81.0ratio of coupon redemptionv=5v=10v=20v=30(a) Overall (b) By experience Figure 8: Ratio of coupon redemption, cases in which some coupon face values v exceed fare p(cid:48) Ia(c) = 1 x and (c) By frequency 5 Model with Unawareness In this section, we formalize the notion of unawareness. The basic idea is that travelers, influenced by external circumstances and internal limited memories, may make decisions with respect to a perceived (awareness) subset Ca rather than the whole coupon set C. 5.1 Model formulation If a traveler is only aware of the subset Ca and make decisions with respect to it, it is unlikely that the traveler concerns about the unawareness itself. This suggests the following assumption: Assumption 11. The traveler does not consider her unawareness of the set of available coupons in evaluating future coupon redemption values. Therefore, This evaluation is the same as in the baseline model. With this assumption, in following discussions we can consider the same policies πxj and πc as those developed in Section 3. Next, we discuss the impact of unawareness on decisions under the setting in which traveler j has an available coupon set C. Because unawarenesses in different periods are correlated, we introduce a new state variable Sa for it. After each trip with the target mobility service, this state Sa is updated with the available coupon set C and the selected coupon group c, according to a function fa: (cid:48) a = fa(Sa, C, c). S (21) At the beginning of a trip, the awareness set Ca is generated according to the state of attention Sa and a distribution Pa: P (Ca) = Pa(CaC, Sa). Given X and Ca, the traveler selects a travel mode 18 246810coupon quantity0.900.920.940.960.98ratio of coupon redemptionobservationsy=1−0.15/x246810coupon quantity0.920.930.940.950.960.970.980.99ratio of coupon redemptionNe∈[2,3]Ne∈[4,7]Ne∈[8,15]Ne∈[16,31]246810coupon quantity0.800.850.900.951.00ratio of coupon redemptionγ∈[e−5,e−4)γ∈[e−4,e−3)γ∈[e−3,e−2)γ∈[e−2,e−1)γ∈[e−1,e−0)according to πxj: P (i = 1) = πxj(px, uxj, Ca). (22) If the traveler completes the trip via the mobility service, detail of the realized trip X(cid:48) is revealed j(·X) and the traveler selects a coupon for redemption given the realized trip fare according to X(cid:48) ∼ P (cid:48) p(cid:48) x. However, with unawareness, the coupon selection behavior is complicated and can be described in two steps. First, the traveler makes a choice c with respect to the awareness set Ca according to the probability πc(cp(cid:48) x, Ca). Then, if there is no coupon redemption (c = c0), the traveler proceeds to payment; otherwise (c (cid:54)= c0), the traveler must open her e-wallet. In this case, she will find that she has the whole coupon set C; we call this situation attention recovery. She then re-evaluates and makes her final decision with respect to set C/C0. Here, the default option c0 is removed from the final consideration set for regularity. In fact, if the traveler is aware of all coupons Ca = C, the re-evaluation should have no effect on the coupon selection probabilities. However, if c0 is included in the final consideration set, the probability of having no coupon redemption increases and differs from πc(c0p(cid:48) x, C). In summary, the probability of selecting coupon group c is Now, if the traveler follows the utility-maximizing policy π∗, the coupon selection probability from the perspective of the observer can be expressed as c = c0 otherwise (23) x, Ca)) (cid:40) P (cp (cid:48) x, Ca) = πc(c0p(cid:48) πc(cp(cid:48) x, Ca) x, C/C0)(1 − πc(c0p(cid:48) (cid:88) P (cp (cid:48) x, C, Sa) = Pa(CaC, Sa)P (cp (cid:48) x, Ca) Ca∈A(C) P (c0p P (cp x, c) + V (f (Ca, c))}) {r(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, Ca) = EV DI(c0 = arg max c∈Ca {r(p x, c) + V (f (Ca, c))}) x, Ca) = EV DI(c0 (cid:54)= arg max (cid:48) (cid:48) c∈Ca {r(p x, c) + V (f (C, c))}). (cid:48) · I(c = arg max c∈C/C0 (24) 5.2 Specification of the inattention mechanism In this subsection, we specify the form of the state of attention Sa and the awareness set probability function Pa. First, from the state transition of Sa we see that Sa can be interpreted as a function of coupon set C. However, this function space is too large to be considered practically: we need to consider every possible correlation among coupon groups. Here, we restrict our attention to the coupon-group-level features. That is, we can interpret Sa as a function from coupon groups c to features Sa(c) related only to that coupon group. Next, we specify the awareness set probability Pa(CaC, Sa). We first look at the special case that there is only one available coupon C = {c, c0}, with c = (cid:104)v, T, 1(cid:105). In this case, the only difference between the two possible outcomes, C and C0, is whether the traveler notices the coupon c = (cid:104)v, T(cid:105). Thus we can say Pa(CC, Sa) = σ(h(Sa(c))), Pa(C0C, Sa) = 1 − σ(h(Sa(c))), (25) where σ is the sigmoid function σ(x) = 1/(1 + e−x) and h is a function. A natural choice of h is the linear functions h(x) = θT x + b, where θ, b are parameters. For the form of Pa(CaC, Sa) in general, there are much more choices: in Subsection 2.2 we have mentioned several of them. Here, we adopt the Manski model [27] which assumes that awarenesses of different elements in the set are independent of each other. Nevertheless, the word "element" is still ambiguous: we can consider independence at either the coupon-level or the coupon-group-level. We 19 now make a detailed discussion on this choice. For coupon-group-level independence, the awareness set Ca can only be a subset of C Pa(CaC, Sa) = (1 − σ(h(Sa(c)))); (26) (cid:89) σ(h(Sa(c))) · (cid:89) c∈Ca c∈C/Ca while for the coupon-level independence, the coupon groups in Ca can be different from those in C and the quantity in each coupon group is important. To further explain this, let us abuse the i i ∈ I a}, with ci = (cid:104)vi, Ti, ni(cid:105) and notation of set and consider C = {c1,··· , cm} and Ca = {ca i = (cid:104)vi, Ti, na ca i is not an element of Ca.) Now the coupon-level independence leads to i ≤ ni. (We say this is an abuse of notation since if na i (cid:105), 0 ≤ na i = 0, ca Pa(CaC, Sa) = [σ(h(Sa(ci)))]na i [(1 − σ(h(Sa(ci))))]ni−na i . (27) (cid:18)ni (cid:19) m(cid:89) na i i=1 At first sight, the coupon-group-level-independence formulation seems to be more straightforward. However, for it to make any sense, the quantity of coupon group n must become one of the features in Sa and has direct impact on the awareness level h(Sa(c)); otherwise, the awareness level remains the same even when we increase n towards infinity. But now the specification of the relationship between n and h(Sa(c)) becomes another problem. To avoid this problem, we choose the coupon-level-independence formulation instead, which provide a simple characterization of the impacts of ni. At the end of this subsection, we discuss which feature to be included in Sa(c). A natural selection is the variable Ia(c) which represents whether the traveler has previously seen coupon c. This function can be defined at the coupon-group level because coupons in the same group are distributed at the same time and should be seen at once. However, from Figure 7 and 8 it is shown that the feature Ia(c) cannot fully capture the inattention effect. Therefore, we add a new parameter θa to capture the remaining possibilities, such as that the traveler may forget the existence of coupons as time passes: Sa(c) = Ia(c), h(Sa(c)) = θa + θasIa(c), (28) where θa, θas are parameters. (cid:40) Finally, for completeness, we provide the formulation of the state transition function fa (cid:48) fa(Sa, C, c)(fc(c )) = 0 1 otherwise c = c0 & fc(c(cid:48)) (cid:54)= c0 & Sa(c(cid:48)) = 0 ,∀c (cid:48) ∈ C/{c} ∪ {(cid:104)v, T, n − 1(cid:105)}. (29) 6 Estimation Results x1, C1, Sa1, λ1, µp1, σp1),··· , (cN , p(cid:48) In this section, we focus on the model estimations given travelers' coupon selection behavior dataset xN , CN , SaN , λN , µpN , σpN )}. As mentioned in Section 4, we {(c1, p(cid:48) focus on the data obtained during the period from April 2017 to June 2017. Estimations on the whole dataset are provided in Appendix D for reference. (cid:88) Recall from Equation (24) that the coupon selection probability P (cp(cid:48) x, C, Sa) is a mixture P (cp (cid:48) x, C, Sa) = Pa(CaC, Sa)P (cp (cid:48) x, Ca), (30) Ca∈A(C) where the awareness set probability Pa(CaC, Sa) is specified in Equations (27) and (28). If we are further given a parametric form of P (cp(cid:48) x, Ca), we can estimate parameters θ in both models by maximizing the (average) log-likelihood of the model on the dataset: Log-Likelihood = 1 N log P (clp (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal). (31) N(cid:88) l=1 20 Concerning about the size of our dataset and the complexity of our models, we use TensorFlow to construct the computation graph of these models and the Adam algorithm [24] to optimize the log-likelihood. Other hyper-parameters for training are summarized in Table 2. In the estimation, the maximal training time for a model is less than an hour. Parameter learning rate mini-batch size training epochs Value 0.001 256 50 Table 2: Hyper-parameters for training Next, we discuss estimation results of various forms of P (cp(cid:48) x, Ca). We start with estimations in cases with only one coupon. 6.1 Cases with only one coupon When there is only one coupon, the available coupon set C can be expressed as {(cid:104)v, T, 1(cid:105), c0}, and we can simplify the notation of coupon c = (cid:104)v, T, 1(cid:105) with (cid:104)v, T(cid:105) and that of value function V ({(cid:104)v, T, 1(cid:105), c0}) with V (v, T ). The value function V in equation (16) can now be computed in a simpler way V (v, T ) = V (v, T − 1) + λjEp(cid:48) x Pj V (v, T ) = 0, ∀ T < 0 or v = 0. max{min(p x, v) − V (v, T − 1), 0} (cid:48) (32) Since in the cases with only one coupon the awareness set Ca can only be either C or C0, we x, C) = x, we can denote it x, C). With some calculations we can show that P (cp(cid:48) remain to specify the form of P (cp(cid:48) EV DI(min(p(cid:48) as P (v, T, p(cid:48) x, v) ≥ V (v, T − 1)); since this probability only depends on v, T and p(cid:48) x) for simplicity. In specifying P (v, T, p(cid:48) x), we use approximation V in Equation (32) as a feature for the optimal value function V . In particular, we consider an estimation with its error following the logistic distribution V (v, T ) = θV V (v, T ) + εV , εV ∼ Logistic(0, 1/θε). With this specification, we have P (v, T, p x, v) − θV V (v, T − 1)]), (cid:48) (cid:48) x) = σ(θε[min(p (33) where σ is the sigmoid function. One can notice that this form of selection probabilities resembles the one from the "near-optimal stochastic policies" in equation (20). This specification is called the "basic specification" in the following discussion. The basic specification can be extended in several directions. First, in the basic specification we assume that the error εV is independent from the face value v. Therefore, we have the same estimation variance in the value of a coupon with v = 30 as in the value of a coupon with v = 5. We can introduce the correlation between εV and v by scaling εV with v: V (v, T ) = θV V (v, T ) + vεV , εV ∼ Logistic(0, 1/θε). This extension is called "scaled" and leads to the following coupon selection probability P (v, T, p x, v)/v − θV V (v, T − 1)/v]). (cid:48) (cid:48) x) = σ(θε[min(p (34) Second, when the traveler exhibits bounded rationalities, V may not provide an accurate estimation. Therefore, we include the face value v as an extra feature in our estimation: V (v, T ) = θV V (v, T ) + θvv + εV , εV ∼ Logistic(0, 1/θε). This extension is called "extra" and leads to the following coupon selection probability P (v, T, p (cid:48) x) = σ(θε[min(p x, v) − θV V (v, T − 1) − θvv]). (cid:48) (35) 21 Finally, as discussed in Section 3, the true optimal value V ∗ is always bounded by finite values. Therefore, we consider to regularize the estimate by clipping: V (v, T ) = max{0, min{v, θV V (v, T ) + εV }}, εV ∼ Logistic(0, 1/θε). This extension is called "clip" and leads to the following coupon selection probability (cid:40) P (v, T, p (cid:48) x) = σ(θε[min(p(cid:48) 1 x, v) − θV V (v, T − 1)]) p(cid:48) x < v, otherwise. (36) These extensions are orthogonal and can be combined with one another. In total, we can obtain eight different models. Table 3 summarizes the estimated parameters and the performance of these models. In this table, the numbers are reported up to three digits after the decimal point, and 0/1 are used to denote False/True and indicate whether a condition is met. "LL" refers to the (average) log-likelihood. "Accuracy" refers to the forecasting accuracy and is computed as Accuracy = 1 N I(cl = arg max c∈Cl P (cp (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal)), (37) "MS" refers to the predicted aggregate coupon redemption ratio (the "market share" of coupon re- demption) and is computed as N(cid:88) l=1 N(cid:88) l=1 MS = 1 − 1 N P (c0p (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal); (38) for Table 3, the observed aggregate coupon redemption ratio is 0.719. Inattention Unaware? 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 θa N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.025 1.183 1.205 1.368 1.047 1.096 1.080 1.122 θas N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.850 2.116 3.868 4.741 1.450 1.427 1.449 1.436 Clip? Extra? Utility Model and Extensions θV Scaled? θε θv LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0.088 0.177 1.926 3.455 0.369 0.358 4.272 5.060 0.224 0.283 4.113 4.860 0.532 0.480 0.620 N/A -0.543 0.128 -0.513 0.513 N/A -0.535 0.154 -0.508 0.743 N/A -0.491 0.439 -0.479 0.652 N/A -0.491 0.387 -0.478 0.826 N/A -0.479 0.536 -0.474 0.797 N/A -0.480 0.568 -0.476 0.274 0.228 0.281 0.188 Evaluation Accuracy MS 0.719 0.701 0.746 0.721 0.714 0.707 0.730 0.720 0.719 0.713 0.723 0.718 0.758 0.781 0.751 0.782 0.780 0.788 0.777 0.787 0.785 0.789 0.787 0.790 Table 3: Estimated parameters and performance in the case with only one coupon Coupon face value 5 10 20 30 Occurrence 2032 3319 50999 21425 Table 4: Occurrence of records with specific face value of the coupon, in the case with only one coupon Direct estimation of models on the raw dataset can lead to bias, because our dataset is unbalanced with respect to the coupon face value v, as shown in Table 4. As v is an exogenous variable and the model should not be biased toward any of its specific values, we use weights to rebalance the importance of each data record. In particular, we give weight w = N/N (v) to records with coupon face value v, where N (v) is the occurrence of records with their coupon face values equaling to v. The 22 weighted log-likelihood, accuracy, and aggregate coupon redemption ratio are respectively given as l=1 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) N(cid:88) l=1 N (vl) l=1 Weighted Log-Likelihood = Weighted Accuracy = Weighted MS = 1 N (vl) 1 N (vl) 1 log P (clp (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal), I(cl = arg max c∈Cl P (cp (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal)), (39) (1 − P (c0p (cid:48) xl, Cl, Sal)), where vl is the face value of the only coupon in Cl. Table 5 summarizes the estimation results with weighting. For this table, the weighted observed aggregate coupon redemption ratio is 0.715. Inattention Unaware? 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 θa N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.711 0.804 0.888 0.983 0.711 0.736 0.743 0.760 θas N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.632 1.766 2.814 3.134 1.594 1.584 1.591 1.587 Clip? Extra? Utility Model and Extensions θV Scaled? θε θv LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0.094 0.196 1.902 2.654 0.973 0.780 5.557 6.415 0.267 0.311 3.991 4.505 0.576 0.376 0.494 N/A -0.588 0.034 -0.558 0.454 N/A -0.555 0.195 -0.541 0.679 N/A -0.515 0.442 -0.508 0.662 N/A -0.495 0.396 -0.487 0.810 N/A -0.493 0.566 -0.491 0.775 N/A -0.496 0.602 -0.494 0.148 0.212 0.291 0.194 Evaluation Accuracy MS 0.680 0.672 0.744 0.729 0.714 0.706 0.731 0.724 0.726 0.723 0.728 0.726 0.739 0.761 0.735 0.759 0.761 0.766 0.766 0.772 0.770 0.773 0.773 0.773 Table 5: Estimated parameters and performance in the case with only one coupon and reweighting According to Tables 3 and 5, we have several findings: 1. In general, models with inattention have much better log-likelihood than their counterparts. They also have slightly better prediction accuracies. 2. Regularizing value function V by clipping does not lead to significant improvement in the log- likelihood or the accuracy. However, the estimated parameters of the inattention model are more stable across different specifications on the utility model. 3. Including extra feature v in the value estimation leads to improvements in the log-likelihood and the accuracy, but the improvement diminishes as the model becomes more sophisticated. When both the inattention mechanism and the value function regularization by clipping are presented in the model, the improvement is almost insignificant. 4. Contrary to our intuition, introducing scaling in the error structure does not lead any significant improvement. Rather, it leads to instability in parameter estimations. 5. For all models, the estimated θV is smaller than 1. This outcome can possibly be explained by the existence of complementary behavioral mechanisms, such as temporal discounting. 6. The forecasted aggregate coupon redemption ratio is more stable and closer to the observed one under the unawareness models. However, the difference between models is not very large. Next, we examine the estimation results in general cases to determine whether the above findings can be generalized. 23 6.2 General cases The coupon selection probability on awareness set in general cases is given in Equation (24) as P (c0p {r(p x, c) + V (f (Ca, c))}), (cid:48) (cid:48) x, Ca) = EV DI(c0 = arg max c∈Ca {r(p P (cpx, Ca) = EV DI(c0 (cid:54)= arg max x, c) + V (f (Ca, c))}) (cid:48) c∈Ca {r(p x, c) + V (f (C, c))}) (cid:48) ≈ EV DI(c0 (cid:54)= arg max {r(p x, c) + V (f (Ca, c))}) (cid:48) c∈Ca · EV DI(c = arg max {r(p c∈C/C0 · I(c = arg max c∈C/C0 x, c) + V (f (C, c))}). (cid:48) (40) Again, we want to find specifications of V with the approximation V from equation (16) and an error term εV such that the above probabilities have tractable forms. One straightforward solution is to consider εV (C) = εV (C) − εV (C0), εV ∼ Gumbel(0, 1/θε) i.i.d.; V (C) = θV V (C) + εV (C), (41) where we subtract εV (C0) for regularity: V (C0) ≡ 0. Notice that this specification is consistent with the one in the case with only one coupon. Now, the coupon selection probability follows the multinomial logit model EV DI(c = arg max c∈C {r(p x, c) + V (f (C, c))}) ∝ exp(θε[r(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + θV V (f (C, c))]). (42) Next, we examine the possible extensions of this basic specification. Among the three possibilities discussed in cases with only one coupon, only the one to include face value v as an extra feature for estimation V can be extended directly. Scaling εV (f (C, c)) with face value v is trivial in implementation but lacks justification in intuition because errors εV for different coupon groups c need to be scaled differently and the overall error structure is broken. Nevertheless, we include it here for comparison. Clipping the estimation V is difficult to implement because with value clipping the coupon selection probability does not have an analytic form. Moreover, direct computation by sampling methods is intractable given the magnitude of our dataset. In this study, we implement an approximation of clipping, which is consistent with the one in cases with only one coupon: clipping only affects the probability of choosing no coupon redemption c0. In particular, if there exists a coupon group c with face value v ≤ p(cid:48) x, we remove c0 from the consideration set: (cid:40) P (cp x, C) ∝ (cid:48) 0 exp(r(p(cid:48) x, c) + V (f (C, c))) c = c0 & ∃(cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105) ∈ C such that p(cid:48) otherwise. x ≥ v > 0, (43) In addition to these three extensions, we consider a nontrivial modification of the error structure. In the current model, coupons that are very similar but not exactly the same are allocated to differ- ent groups. Therefore, behavior given coupon set {(cid:104)v, T, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)v + , T, 1(cid:105), c0} will change abruptly as → 0. One way to restore the continuity in behavior is to view every coupon as a unique one and consider independent coupon-level estimation error. That is, for any two coupon c1 and c2 in the same group c, the errors in the estimations V (f (C, c)) are independent. This modification leads to another multinomial logit model EV DI(c = arg max c∈C {r(p x, c) + V (f (C, c))}) ∝ n · exp(θε[r(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + θV V (f (C, c))]), (44) where n is the number of coupons in group c. This extension is called "iid". Table 6 summarizes the estimated parameters and the performance of models with different com- binations of the extensions above. As the computational complexity of the inattention model scales 24 according to the size of A(C), we limit our attention on records where A(C) ≤ 64. Such records constitute more than 90% of the records in the whole dataset. As a comparison, we also summarize the estimation results on the dataset where each record has A(C) ≤ 16 in Table 7; by calculating the difference between these two tables we can evaluate the stability in the estimated parameters. The observed aggregate coupon redemption ratio for Tables 6 and 7 are 0.803 and 0.786, respectively. Inattention Utility Model and Extensions Evaluation Unaware? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 θa N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -0.289 -0.268 -0.098 -0.050 -0.393 -0.374 -0.244 -0.215 -0.473 -0.441 -0.425 -0.430 -0.470 -0.438 -0.412 -0.415 0.411 0.380 Clip? Extra? Scaled? iid? θε θV θv LL 0.361 0.396 θas N/A 0.873 N/A -0.823 N/A 0.435 -0.797 N/A 0.800 N/A -0.865 N/A 0.456 -0.852 N/A 0.898 N/A -0.889 N/A 0.482 -0.866 N/A 0.995 N/A -0.931 N/A 0.555 -0.918 2.689 0.722 N/A -0.713 2.844 0.520 -0.701 4.309 0.714 N/A -0.808 5.028 0.620 -0.806 2.358 0.702 N/A -0.750 2.387 0.513 -0.739 3.890 0.780 N/A -0.860 4.249 0.688 -0.859 1.625 0.680 N/A -0.727 1.642 0.475 -0.716 1.682 0.705 N/A -0.833 1.678 0.740 -0.833 1.585 0.680 N/A -0.757 1.600 0.488 -0.746 1.674 0.805 N/A -0.873 1.671 -0.873 0.830 Table 6: Estimated parameters and performance on subset A(C) ≤ 64 0.126 0.222 2.423 3.931 0.134 0.226 2.333 3.902 0.332 0.422 4.810 5.314 0.388 0.493 5.256 5.772 0.367 0.490 5.120 4.925 0.413 0.539 5.238 5.110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.216 0.118 0.185 0.107 0.205 0.039 0.182 0.025 Accuracy MS 0.808 0.795 0.816 0.798 0.850 0.846 0.820 0.803 0.774 0.767 0.784 0.780 0.787 0.784 0.785 0.782 0.768 0.761 0.767 0.755 0.776 0.772 0.769 0.762 0.747 0.753 0.673 0.674 0.662 0.671 0.614 0.620 0.705 0.709 0.628 0.629 0.658 0.662 0.587 0.587 0.706 0.709 0.626 0.627 0.660 0.664 0.587 0.587 Our findings from these estimation results are outlined as follows: 1. Similar to results in the case with only one coupon, models with inattention have better log- likelihood. However, now their accuracies are poor. Because our model of inattention only increases the relative probability of the default option c0, this observation implies that our inattention model underestimates travelers' ability to remember. This claim is also supported by the underestimation of aggregate coupon redemption ratio from unawareness models. Compared with results from cases with only one coupon, it seems that the prediction accuracy of our unawareness model drops as the size of the coupon set C increases. This observation will be useful when we attempt to improve our model in the future. 2. Possibly because of a lack of justification, both scaling εV with v and the approximated clipping of V lead to poor log-likelihood and low accuracy. We also observe no improvement in the stability of parameter estimation from value clipping. 3. The extension with independent coupon-level estimation errors is entirely ineffective. Recall that with this modification, we try to solve the discontinuity problem by introducing heterogeneities among coupons in a coupon group. In the future, we can go in the opposite direction and consider homogeneities between coupons from different coupon groups. 25 Inattention Unaware? θa Utility Model and Extensions Evaluation Clip? Extra? θε θV θv LL θas N/A N/A 2.830 3.013 1.690 1.701 0 0 1 1 1 1 N/A 0.748 N/A 0.756 -0.175 0.699 -0.143 0.702 -0.364 0.699 -0.331 0.702 Table 7: Estimated parameters and performance on subset A(C) ≤ 16 0.785 N/A -0.774 0.379 -0.748 0.706 N/A -0.677 0.504 -0.666 0.680 N/A -0.690 0.471 -0.681 0.120 0.213 0.315 0.398 0.343 0.461 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.222 0.423 0.210 Accuracy MS 0.806 0.787 0.765 0.757 0.757 0.749 4. Including the extra feature v in the value estimation leads to significant improvements in both the log-likelihood and the prediction accuracy. This outcome can possibly be explained by the lack of an accurate inattention model or by travelers' bounded rationality in facing difficult optimization problems. 5. The estimate of θV is again smaller than 1 for all models, suggesting the existence of comple- mentary behavioral mechanisms. 6. Finally, estimates in Tables 6 and 7 are close to each other but different from those in Table 3. The difference in the parameters of the inattention model is especially large. This finding implies that, despite consistency in terms of mathematical forms, the models developed in this subsection are not natural extensions of the models in cases with only one coupon. 7 Impact of Unawarenesses on Coupons' Promotional Effects In this section, we evaluate the impact of unawarenesses on coupons' promotional effects via simulation. We first show that why a qualitative analysis of such impact is difficult. Recall that the utility gain from choosing the mobility service under the optimal mode choice policy π∗ xj is (f (C))}. (f (C, c)) − V {r(p (cid:48) x, c) + V (45) ∗ ∗ uxj + EX(cid:48)X max c∈C When the traveler is only aware of a subset Ca of available coupons instead of the whole set C, the opportunity cost V ∗(f (Ca))−V ∗(f (Ca, c)) of using a coupon c from group c becomes larger. According to equation (45), the traveler is then less likely to use the mobility service. However, unawarenesses also reduces the rate of coupon redemption and the impact of the coupons can last longer. Moreover, with the attention recovery in the payment stage, the traveler may select a coupon c costlier to the operator than any other in Ca. Since all these factors push the promotional effects of coupons in different directions, the impact of inattention is hard to understand qualitatively. Next, we simulate the traveler's decision flow with the models developed in Sections 3 and 5, and summarize performance metrics including the total trip quantity Ntrip, the total redeemed coupon value Vredeemed, and the promotional effect (cid:80)(Ntrip − Ntrip,0) (cid:80) Vredeemed ρ = , (46) In the simulation, we simplify the trip demand generation and the trip realization processes to pj), uxj ≡ u0 ∈ x) ≡ log(px) ∼ N (µpj, σ2 where Ntrip,0 is the baseline total trip quantity. reduce computational burden, by assuming that λj ≡ 1, log(p(cid:48) R. Under these assumptions, the optimal mode selection policy dictates (f (Ca, c)) − V ∗ (f (Ca)}) ≥ 0). (47) {r(px, c) + V = 1Ca, λj, Pj) = I(u0 + max c∈Ca P (x ∗ (cid:48) 26 Again, since we do not know V ∗ exactly, we follow the specifications in Section 6 to use V from equation (16) as an estimate and assume a logistic estimation error. Now we have P (x (cid:48) = 1Ca, λj, Pj) = σ(β[u0 + max c∈Ca {r(px, c) + V (f (Ca, c)) − V (f (Ca))}]), (48) where σ is the sigmoid function and β is a parameter describing the sensitivity of the service selection probability to coupon values. For the coupon selection probability P (cpx, Ca), we specify the same form of πc(cp(cid:48) x, Ca) as the basic specification in Section 6: πc(cp x, Ca) ∝ exp(θε[r(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + θV V (f (Ca, c))]). In the experiment, we consider the same setting as in Example 2: (49) fare distribution log(px) ∼ N (3.15, 0.752), and the coupon set C = {c0,(cid:104)10, 30, 2(cid:105),(cid:104)10, 15, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)5, 20, 1(cid:105),(cid:104)20, 5, 1(cid:105)}. For a compre- hensive evaluation, we consider various combinations of the default mode selection rate λ0 = σ(βu0) and the coupon value sensitivity β. For parameters in the inattention and coupon selection models, we choose θas = 1.5, θa = −0.5, θε = 0.5, which are close to the estimations in Section 6. We also assume that all coupons are activated; that is, Sa(c) = 1 for all c ∈ C. For evaluation, we simulate each (λ0, β) case with Tmax = maxc T = 30 steps and for 250,000 times. Table 8 presents the simulation results and shows that models with inattention indeed lead to lower promotional effect ρ than their counterparts; in fact, the reduction in ρ can be as great as 10%. In Table 8, the default trip quantity Ntrip,0 can be calculated with λ0Tmax. Inattention Ntrip mean std mean Vredeemed std λ0 = 0.05, β = 0.01; Ntrip,0 = 1.5 13.20 12.78 λ0 = 0.05, β = 0.05; Ntrip,0 = 1.5 14.33 13.98 1.231 1.223 1.350 1.335 1.638 1.619 17.52 16.43 25.27 22.91 2.315 2.189 ρ 0.0079 0.0072 0.0322 0.0301 λ0 = 0.2, β = 0.01; Ntrip,0 = 6 6.152 6.119 2.166 2.172 43.45 40.28 11.90 12.78 0.0035 0.0030 λ0 = 0.2, β = 0.05; Ntrip,0 = 6 6.718 6.588 2.054 2.102 47.70 44.06 9.83 11.41 0.0151 0.0134 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Table 8: Simulation results of coupons' promotional effects 8 Discussion and Conclusion In this paper, we proposed an inattention mechanism on unawareness to explain the observed deviation of traveler coupon redemption behavior from utility-maximization and estimation results in Section 6 shows that our model indeed leads to a better fit of the dataset compared with baseline models. Moreover, our simulation experiment in Section 7 shows that if such unawareness exists, it can lead to a considerable reduction in the promotional effects of coupons. Therefore, a service operator should be aware of travelers' unawarenesses and take necessary actions. For example, when distributing coupons, the operator should send notifications to travelers to ensure that they are properly incentivized. More- over, when a traveler's forgetfulness is unavoidable, the operator should include the probability of coupon unawareness in the design of coupon distribution strategies. The model developed in this study has several limitations worthy of further exploration. First, we did not obtain consistent parameter estimates of the inattention model between the case with only 27 one coupon and general cases. We speculate that the independent coupon-level inattention mechanism employed here is inappropriate. In addition, our consideration of attention state Sa and transition fa is restricted to the first activation event Ia. In the future, we can include more information in Sa, such as the time from the most recent activation of each coupon, and consider more complicated transition dynamics fa, such as the Hawkes process or even recurrent neural networks. Second, we focused on the impact of unawareness in this study, but travelers may also exhibit deliberate attention. In fact, our model of coupon groups dictates a nested consideration structure similar to the one in the classic nested logit model [7]. However, as mentioned in Section 6, this nested structure violates regularities because it imposes strong correlations among coupons in the same group but requires independence of coupons from different groups even when these coupons are very similar. In the future, we can employ existing works on consideration sets to develop models that are effective in capturing travelers' perceived homogeneity among coupons. Third, given the limitations in computational power, we failed to extend the value clipping regu- larization to general cases, and our simple approximation was shown to be ineffective. Further work in developing tractable estimation algorithms of this model is needed. Finally, our estimation results show that even after we take the impact of unawareness into account, traveler behavior still deviates from utility-maximization decisions. However, it is questionable whether there are alternative decision mechanisms that are both theoretically justifiable and computationally tractable. Acknowledgement The author thanks Shenhao Wang and Xiang Song for their insightful comments. References [1] Jason Abaluck and Abi Adams. Discrete choice models with consideration sets: Identification from asymmetric cross-derivatives, 2016. [2] Pieter Abbeel and Andrew Y Ng. Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, page 1. ACM, 2004. [3] Victor Aguirregabiria and Pedro Mira. Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics, 156(1):38 -- 67, 2010. [4] Gozen Ba¸sar and Chandra Bhat. A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: an application to the san francisco bay area. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(10):889 -- 904, 2004. [5] Kapil Bawa, Srini S Srinivasan, and Rajendra K Srivastava. Coupon attractiveness and coupon proneness: A framework for modeling coupon redemption. Journal of Marketing Research, pages 517 -- 525, 1997. [6] Moshe Ben-Akiva and Bruno Boccara. Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. International journal of Research in Marketing, 12(1):9 -- 24, 1995. [7] Moshe E. Ben-Akiva and Steven R. Lerman. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, volume 9. MIT press, 1985. [8] Robert Blattberg, Thomas Buesing, Peter Peacock, and Subrata Sen. Identifying the deal prone segment. In Perspectives On Promotion And Database Marketing: The Collected Works of Robert C Blattberg, pages 79 -- 87. World Scientific, 2010. 28 [9] M Keith Chen and Michael Sheldon. Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the uber platform. In EC, page 455, 2016. [10] Jeongwen Chiang, Siddhartha Chib, and Chakravarthi Narasimhan. Markov chain monte carlo and models of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1- 2):223 -- 248, 1998. [11] Chelsea Finn, Paul Christiano, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. A connection between generative adversarial networks, inverse reinforcement learning, and energy-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03852, 2016. [12] Justin Fu, Katie Luo, and Sergey Levine. Learning robust rewards with adversarial inverse rein- forcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.11248, 2017. [13] Xavier Gabaix. A sparsity-based model of bounded rationality. The Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics, 129(4):1661 -- 1710, 2014. [14] Michelle Sovinsky Goeree. Limited information and advertising in the us personal computer industry. Econometrica, 76(5):1017 -- 1074, 2008. [15] Fusun Gonul and Kannan Srinivasan. Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior: A dynamic structural model. Marketing science, 15(3):262 -- 279, 1996. [16] James J Heckman and Salvador Navarro. Dynamic discrete choice and dynamic treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 136(2):341 -- 396, 2007. [17] Jonathan Ho and Stefano Ermon. Generative adversarial imitation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4565 -- 4573, 2016. [18] Elisabeth Honka. Quantifying search and switching costs in the us auto insurance industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 45(4):847 -- 884, 2014. [19] Elisabeth Honka, Ali Horta¸csu, and Maria Ana Vitorino. Advertising, consumer awareness, and choice: Evidence from the us banking industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 48(3):611 -- 646, 2017. [20] V Joseph Hotz and Robert A Miller. Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3):497 -- 529, 1993. [21] J Jeffrey Inman and Leigh McAlister. Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior? Journal of Marketing Research, pages 423 -- 428, 1994. [22] Sudarsan Jayasingh and Uchenna Cyril Eze. An empirical analysis of consumer behavioural intention towards mobile coupons in malaysia. International Journal of Business and Information, 4(2), 2015. [23] Jun B Kim, Paulo Albuquerque, and Bart J Bronnenberg. Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing science, 29(6):1001 -- 1023, 2010. [24] Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. [25] Donald R Lichtenstein, Richard G Netemeyer, and Scot Burton. Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. The Journal of Marketing, pages 54 -- 67, 1990. 29 [26] Mohamed Salah Mahmoud, Adam Weiss, and Khandker Nurul Habib. Myopic choice or rational decision making? an investigation into mode choice preference structures in competitive modal arrangements in a multimodal urban area, the city of toronto. Canadian Journal of Civil Engi- neering, 43(5):420 -- 428, 2016. [27] Charles F Manski. The structure of random utility models. Theory and decision, 8(3):229 -- 254, 1977. [28] Paola Manzini and Marco Mariotti. Stochastic choice and consideration sets. Econometrica, 82(3):1153 -- 1176, 2014. [29] Yusufcan Masatlioglu and Daisuke Nakajima. Choice by iterative search. Theoretical Economics, 8(3):701 -- 728, 2013. [30] Yusufcan Masatlioglu, Daisuke Nakajima, and Erkut Y Ozbay. Revealed attention. In Behavioral Economics of Preferences, Choices, and Happiness, pages 495 -- 522. Springer, 2016. [31] Andrew Y Ng, Stuart J Russell, et al. Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. In Icml, pages 663 -- 670, 2000. [32] Imke Reimers and Claire Xie. Do coupons expand or cannibalize revenue? evidence from an e-market. Management Science, 2018. [33] John Rust. Optimal replacement of gmc bus engines: An empirical model of harold zurcher. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 999 -- 1033, 1987. [34] Stephan Seiler. The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: A dynamic approach. Quanti- tative Marketing and Economics, 11(2):155 -- 203, 2013. [35] Allan D Shocker, Moshe Ben-Akiva, Bruno Boccara, and Prakash Nedungadi. Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing letters, 2(3):181 -- 197, 1991. [36] Christopher A Sims. 50(3):665 -- 690, 2003. Implications of rational inattention. Journal of monetary Economics, [37] Joffre Swait and Moshe Ben-Akiva. Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in sao paulo, brazil. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 21(2):103 -- 115, 1987. [38] Ronald W Ward and James E Davis. Coupon redemption. Journal of Advertising Research, 18(4):51 -- 58, 1978. [39] Dennis J Zhang, Hengchen Dai, Lingxiu Dong, Fangfang Qi, Nannan Zhang, Xiaofei Liu, and Zhongyi Liu. How does dynamic pricing affect customer behavior on retailing platforms? evidence from a large randomized experiment on alibaba. 2017. [40] Brian D Ziebart, Andrew L Maas, J Andrew Bagnell, and Anind K Dey. Maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning. In AAAI, volume 8, pages 1433 -- 1438. Chicago, IL, USA, 2008. 30 A Appendix A.1 Value functions in general cases In general situations, assumption 2 does not hold. In this section, we derive value functions for both discrete time settings with general time unit t0 and continuous time setting. We also show the equivalence between the two as the time unit t0 diminishes to 0. First, consider unit time trip generation rate ¯λj: in discrete time settings with a time unit t0, the trip generation probability in each time step is ¯λjt0, while in continuous time setting, the time gap δt between consecutive trips follows the exponential distribution δt ∼ Exp(1/¯λj). When assumption 2 does not hold, we need to consider state transition of coupon sets with respect to a variety of time periods. Therefore, we consider the following generalization of coupon state transition function f : f (C, c, t) = f2(f1(C, t), c) f1(C, t) = {fc(c)c ∈ C} (cid:40)(cid:104)v, T − t, n(cid:105) (cid:40) fc((cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105), t) = f2(C,(cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105)) = v, n > 0, T ≥ t otherwise c0 (C/(cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105)) ∪ (cid:104)v, T, n − 1(cid:105) C/(cid:104)v, T, n(cid:105) (50) n > 0 otherwise Because now a coupon can expire before a trip ends, we include the state transition fc within the formulation of individual trips. However, such a transition depends on the realized trip time and ultimately the travel mode. Here, we use tx and t(cid:48) x to represent the vector of estimated and realized trip times, respectively. Because these new variables make the problem more complicated, we introduce the following assumptions for a simple characterization. Assumption 12. (a) The time discount factor γ equals to 1 (there is no time discount effect). i(cid:54)=1 P (i)V (f1(C, t(cid:48) xi)) = (1 − P (1))V (f1(C, ¯t)); ¯t ∈ R+ can be interpreted as the expected trip time from alternative modes. (b) (cid:80) Now, the value functions in the discrete time setting with time unit t0 can be given as follows. t0 (C) = (1 − ¯λjt0)V π V π t0 (f1(C, t0)) + ¯λjt0EX{V π t0 (f1(C,(cid:100)¯t/t0(cid:101) · t0)) + EX(cid:48)X V π t0 (f1(C,(cid:100)¯t/t0(cid:101) · t0))+ x, f1(C,(cid:100)t x1/t0(cid:101) · t0))] (cid:48) (cid:48) c,t0(p πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj − V π − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}, (51) (cid:48) V π c,t0 (p x, C) = πc(cp (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + V π x, C)[r(p t0 (f2(C, c))], (cid:88) c∈C V π t0 (C0) = 0. On the other hand, the value functions in the continuous time setting can be given as follows. ¯V π(C) = Eδt¯λj{EX{ ¯V π(f1(C, ¯t + δt))+ πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj − ¯V π(f1(C, ¯t + δt)) + EX(cid:48)X ¯V π − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}}, c (p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, f1(C, t x1 + δt))] (52) (cid:48) ¯V π c (p x, C) = πc(cp (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + ¯V π(f2(C, c))], x, C)[r(p (cid:88) c∈C ¯V π(C0) = 0. The similarity between the above two equations actually leads to the following equivalence result: 31 Proposition 3. The value function V π t0 ¯V π in the continuous time setting as the time step size t0 diminishes to 0: in the discrete time setting converges to the value function ¯V π(C) = lim t0→0 t0 (C), ∀C ∈ C. V π Proof of Proposition 3. First, let ¯Qπ(C, δt) be EX{ ¯V π(f1(C, ¯t + δt))+ πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj − ¯V π(f1(C, ¯t + δt)) + EX(cid:48)X ¯V π − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}. (cid:48) (cid:48) x1 + δt))] x, f1(C, t c (p Then we have − d{ ¯V π(f1(C, t))} dt (cid:90) ∞ (cid:90) ∞ 0 = − d dt = − d dt ¯λje −¯λj δt ¯Qπ(C, t + δt)dδt −¯λj (δt−t) ¯Qπ(C, δt)dδt (cid:90) ∞ t ¯λje = ¯λj ¯Qπ(C, t) − = ¯λj[ ¯Qπ(C, t) − ¯V π(f1(C, t))]. ¯λ2 j e t −¯λj (δt−t) ¯Qπ(C, δt)dδt If we let t = 0 in the above equations, we have − d{ ¯V π(f1(C, t))} dt t=0 = ¯λj[ ¯Qπ(C, 0) − ¯V π(C)]. (53) (54) (55) (56) t0(C, δt) be t0 (f1(C, δt + (cid:100)¯t/t0(cid:101) · t0))+ Secondly, if we let Qπ EX{V π πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj − V π − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}, t0 (f1(C, δt + (cid:100)¯t/t0(cid:101) · t0)) + EX(cid:48)X V π c,t0 (p x, f1(C, δt + (cid:100)t (cid:48) x1/t0(cid:101) · t0))] (cid:48) (57) we have Because − d{limt0→0 V π t0 (f1(C, t))} dt t=0 = lim t0→0 = lim t0→0 t0 (C) − V π V π t0 (f1(C, t0)) t0 ¯λj(Qπ t0(C, 0) − V π t0(C, 0) − lim Qπ t0→0 t0 (f1(C, t0))) V π t0 ((C)). = ¯λj( lim t0→0 (58) lim t0→0 t0(C, 0) = EX{ lim Qπ t0→0 V π t0 (f1(C, ¯t))+ πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj − lim t0→0 − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}, V π t0 (f1(C, ¯t)) + EX(cid:48)X lim t0→0 V π c,t0(p (cid:48) (cid:48) x, f1(C, t x1))] (59) we can see that equations (56) and (58) actually refer to the same differential equation. Given boundary t0 (C0) = ¯V π(C0) = 0, we know the solution to the differential equation is unique condition limt0→0 V π and therefore limt0→0 V π t0 (C) = ¯V π(C). 32 A.2 Proofs A.2.1 Proof of Corollary 1 Proof of Corollary 1. By replacing the coupon set C in equations (7), (9) and (10) with the default set C0, we have U π(C0) = (1 − λj)γU π(C0) + λjEX U π xj(px, uxj, C0), xj(px, uxj, C0) = (1 − πxj(px, uxj, C0))γU π(C0) + πxj(px, uxj, C0)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X U π U π c (p (cid:48) x, C0) = γU π(C0), c (p U π (cid:48) x, C0)] + ux1j, (60) which we can simplify to U π(C0) = (1 − λj)γU π(C0) + λjEX{(1 − πxj(px, uxj, C0))γU π(C0) + πxj(px, uxj, C0)[uxj + γU π(C0)] + ux1j} = γU π(C0) + λjEX [ux1j + πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj] = 1 1 − γ λjEX [ux1j + πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj]. A.2.2 Proof of Proposition 1 (61) Proof of Proposition 1. First, it is easy to see that U π the definition of V π and V π c , and equations (7), (9) and (10), we have x, C0) = γU π(f (C0)) = γU π(C0). Now, by c (p(cid:48) V π c (p (cid:48) x, C) = = πc(cp (cid:48) x, C)[r(p πc(cp (cid:48) x, C)[r(p x, c) + γU π(f (C, c))] − γU π(f (C0)) (cid:48) (cid:48) x, c) + γV π(f (C, c))], (cid:88) (cid:88) c∈C c∈C and V π(C) = γ[U π(f (C)) − U π(f (C0))] + λjEX{ x, C) − γU π(f (C))] (cid:48) πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X U π c (p − πxj(px, uxj, C0)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X U π c (p x, C0) − γU π(f (C0))]} (cid:48) = γV π(f (C)) + λjEX{ πxj(px, uxj, C)[uxj + EX(cid:48)X V π c (p x, C) − γV π(f (C))] − πxj(px, uxj, C0)uxj}. (cid:48) A.2.3 Proof of Proposition 2 Lemma 1. If x ≥ y, then we have I(x ≥ 0)(x − y) ≥ max(x, 0) − max(y, 0) ≥ I(y ≥ 0)(x − y), where I(·) is the indicator function. Proof of Lemma 1. Since x ≥ y, we have y ≥ 0 ⇒ x ≥ 0, and x < 0 ⇒ y < 0. Therefore max(x, 0) − max(y, 0) = I(y ≥ 0)(max(x, 0) − max(y, 0)) + I(y < 0)(max(x, 0) − max(y, 0)) = I(y ≥ 0)(x − y) + I(g(x) < 0) max(x, 0) ≥ I(y ≥ 0)(x − y). 33 (62) (63) (64) (65) Similarly, we have max(x, 0) − max(y, 0) = I(x ≥ 0)(max(x, 0) − max(y, 0)) + I(x < 0)(max(x, 0) − max(y, 0)) = I(x ≥ 0)(x − max(y, 0)) ≤ I(x ≥ 0)(x − y). (66) Proof of Proposition 2. First, recall that in the coupon selection stage, default action c0 is always available. Therefore the ex post value function V ∗ x, C) ≥ r(p (cid:48) ∗ c (p V (cid:48) x, c0) + V c (p(cid:48) x, C) has a lower bound ∗ ∗ (f (C, c0)) = V (f (C)). (67) This further leads to uxj + EX(cid:48)X V Now, applying Lemma 1 with x = uxj + EX(cid:48)X V ∗ max(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V max(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V ∗ c (p ∗ c (p x, C) − V (cid:48) x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ ∗ x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ c (p c (p(cid:48) (f (C)) ≥ uxj. ∗ x, C) − V ∗(f (C)) and y = uxj, we have ∗ (f (C))], (f (C)) ≥ 0)· (f (C)), 0) − max(uxj, 0) ≥ I(uxj ≥ 0)[EX(cid:48)X V x, C) − V ∗ (cid:48) c (p (f (C)), 0) − max(uxj, 0) ≤ I(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ ∗ c (p x, C) − V (cid:48) [EX(cid:48)X V (f (C))]. ∗ c (p (68) ∗ V V ∗ ∗ Putting above inequalities back to the ex ante value function in equation (14), we have (C) ≥ V ∗ (C) ≤ V ∗ Since λjEX I(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V ∗ (f (C))]. (70) x, C) − V ∗(f (C)) ≥ 0) is exactly the service selection probability (f (C)) + λjEX I(uxj ≥ 0)[EX(cid:48)X V ∗ (f (C)) + λjEX I(uxj + EX(cid:48)X V c (p ∗ (f (C)) ≥ 0)[EX(cid:48)X V ∗ c (p x, C) − V (cid:48) x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ x, C) − V (cid:48) (f (C))], c (p(cid:48) ∗ c (p ∗ P (x(cid:48) = 1C, λj, Pj), the equations above can be further simplified to (69) V ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ (C) ≥ V (C) ≤ V x, C) − V ∗ (cid:48) ∗ c (p = 1)[V x, C) − V ∗ (cid:48) ∗ c (p x are conditional on λj, Pj and P (cid:48) Notice that in equations above we hide the fact that x(cid:48) and p(cid:48) j. Now, given boundary condition V ∗(C0) = V L(C0), we can show by the induction principle that for (f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) (f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) xC0I(x (cid:48) xCI(x (f (C))], (f (C))], = 1)[V (71) V (cid:48) every C ∈ C ∗ (C) ≥ V ∗ V (f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) xC0I(x xC0I(x = Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) ≥ Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) = V L(f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) = V L(C). (cid:48) (cid:48) ∗ ∗ = 1)[V (cid:48) xC0I(x x, C) − V (cid:48) ∗ c (p (f (C))] (cid:48) (cid:48) ∗ xC0I(x (f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) = 0)V x, C) c (p (cid:48) (cid:48) = 0)V L(f (C)) + Ex(cid:48),p(cid:48) xC0I(x c (p x, C) x, C) − V L(f (C))] (cid:48) c (p = 1)V = 1)V L = 1)[V L xC0 I(x (cid:48) (72) Similarly we have V ∗(C) ≤ V U (C),∀ C ∈ C given V ∗(C0) = V U (C0). 34 v T n c c c0 C Ca C A(C) λj µpj σpj px uxj uxj i x(cid:48) p(cid:48) x Sa Ia(·) r(·,·) f (·,·) fc(·) fa(·,·,·) γ πxj(·,·,·) πc(·,·) U π(·) V π(·) V ∗(·) V (·) V (·) εV (·) V L(·), V U (·) D θ σ(·) I(·) A.3 Notation table coupon related face value time to expire number of coupons in the group coupon coupon group default (zero-valued) coupon group coupon set awareness coupon subset set of all coupon sets set of all awareness subset of set C model related trip demand generation rate of traveler j mean of log fare log(p(cid:48) standard deviation of log fare log(p(cid:48) estimated trip fare x) of traveler j x) of traveler j vector of trip utilities from different travel modes relative utility gain in taking the target mobility service mode selection of travelers whether there is a trip served by the target mobility service realized trip fare state of attention coupon activation record function coupon redemption utility function state transition functions of coupon set state transition functions of coupon state transition function of attention discount factor value function related mode selection policy of traveler j coupon selection policy of travelers expected accumulated utility under policy π utility gain from coupon sets under policy π optimal utility gain from coupon sets lower & upper bound of V ∗ approximated utility gain from coupon sets estimation of utility gain from coupon sets (random variable) estimation error (random variable) others dataset model parameters sigmoid function indicator function Table 9: Summary of major notations 35 A.4 Estimation results with the whole dataset Inattention Unaware? 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 θa N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.392 0.613 0.385 0.594 0.377 0.438 0.370 0.437 θas N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.444 3.100 2.600 3.841 1.722 1.684 1.732 1.691 Clip? Extra? Utility Model and Extensions θV Scaled? θε Evaluation θv LL Accuracy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0.064 0.177 1.144 3.676 0.379 0.361 6.135 6.429 0.217 0.293 4.814 6.479 0.669 0.852 N/A -0.638 0.114 -0.594 0.665 N/A -0.639 0.061 -0.593 0.785 N/A -0.560 0.440 -0.547 0.760 N/A -0.555 0.395 -0.542 0.913 N/A -0.549 0.534 -0.543 0.871 N/A -0.549 0.505 -0.543 0.365 0.289 0.327 0.712 0.289 0.677 0.708 0.663 0.706 0.701 0.716 0.701 0.716 0.714 0.718 0.714 0.718 Table 10: Estimated parameters and performance in the case with only one coupon on the whole dataset Inattention Utility Model and Extensions Evaluation Unaware? 0 0 1 1 1 1 θa N/A N/A -0.490 -0.448 -0.700 -0.664 θas N/A N/A 2.530 2.723 1.561 1.577 Clip? Extra? 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 θε 0.124 0.242 0.346 0.447 0.377 0.504 θV θv LL Accuracy 0.466 0.802 N/A -0.832 0.329 -0.795 0.724 N/A -0.709 0.490 -0.693 0.708 N/A -0.722 0.482 -0.710 0.219 0.245 0.709 0.725 0.699 0.705 0.697 0.703 Table 11: Estimated parameters and performance on subset A(C) ≤ 64 of the whole dataset 36
1808.05996	1	1808	2018-08-17T20:59:41	$k$th price auctions and Catalan numbers	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper establishes an interesting link between $k$th price auctions and Catalan numbers by showing that for distributions that have linear density, the bid function at any symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a $k$th price auction with $k\geq 3$ can be represented as a finite series of $k-2$ terms whose $\ell$th term involves the $\ell$th Catalan number. Using an integral representation of Catalan numbers, together with some classical combinatorial identities, we derive the closed form of the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a $k$th price auction for a non-uniform distribution.	econ.TH	econ	kth price auctions and Catalan numbers Abdel-Hameed Nawar∗ Debapriya Sen† August 21, 2018 Abstract This paper establishes an interesting link between kth price auctions and Catalan numbers by showing that for distributions that have linear density, the bid function at any symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a kth price auction with k ≥ 3 can be represented as a finite series of k − 2 terms whose ℓth term involves the ℓth Catalan number. Using an integral representation of Catalan numbers together with some classical combinatorial identities, we derive the closed form of the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a kth price auction for a non-uniform distribution. Keywords: kth price auction; the revenue equivalence principle; Catalan numbers; Jensen's identity; Hagen-Rothe's identity 8 1 0 2 g u A 7 1 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 6 9 9 5 0 . 8 0 8 1 : v i X r a ∗Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt. †Department of Economics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 1 "Catalan numbers: an integer sequence that materializes in unexpected places" -- Martin Gardner (1976) 1 Introduction In a kth price auction with k or more bidders, the highest bidder wins the object and pays the kth highest bid as price. This paper establishes an interesting link of such auctions with Catalan numbers1 by showing that for certain distributions, the bid function at any symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a kth price auction with k ≥ 3 can be represented as a finite series involving Catalan numbers. Using an integral representation of Catalan numbers together with some classical combinatorial identities, we are then able to characterize equilibrium bids and obtain their bounds. There are results on the existence of equilibrium for kth price auctions (e.g., Kagel and Levin, 1993; Monderer and Tennenholtz, 2000), but beyond uniform distributions, closed form expressions of equilibrium bids are mostly unknown. This paper shows that Catalan numbers can help us to fill this void. We consider an independent private value kth price auction with k ≥ 3, in which there are k or more risk neutral bidders, where values are continuously distributed in a finite interval. To identify symmetric, increasing equilibrium of this auction, we follow the approach of appealing to the revenue equivalence principle.2 The revenue equivalence principle implies that at any symmetric, increasing equilibrium of a kth price auction, for any value the expected payment of a bidder is the same as its expected payment in a second-price auction. Given this result, the first step would be to see if we can find an expression of bid function using the relation on expected payments. If that can be found, the second step would be to verify if the resulting bid function is increasing. Provided that is the case, we can conclude that this bid function constitutes a symmetric equilibrium of the kth price auction. For a kth price auction with general distributions, the problem of determining the bid function from the revenue equivalence principle is quite involved. We are able to find a closed form expression of the bid function for distributions that have a linear density function, so that its second and higher order derivatives are all zero. For these distributions, we show that the bid function is a finite series of k − 2 terms whose ℓth term involves the ℓth Catalan number (Lemma 2, Section 3.1). Building on this result, we use the integral representation of Catalan numbers derived by Penson and Sixdeniers (2001), together with the combinatorial identities of Jensen and Hagen- 1Catalan numbers are named after Belgian mathematician Eug`ene Charles Catalan (1814- 1894). Early works in relation to this sequence can be traced back to Mongolian mathemati- cian Ming'antu (1692-1763). See Pak (2015) for a history and Stanley (2015) for a comprehensive overview. Also see sequence A000108 of "The On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences" of Sloane: https://oeis.org/A000108 2Vickrey (1961) introduced independent private value auctions and subsequently (Vickrey, 1962) established revenue equivalence between first and second price auctions. Riley and Samuelson (1981) and Myerson (1981) established the revenue equivalence principle. For a comprehensive presentation of auction theory, see the book of Krishna (2002). There is a small literature on kth price auction with complete information (e.g., Tauman, 2002; Mathews and Schwartz, 2017). 2 Rothe to show that for a specific non-uniform distribution (triangle distribution), the resulting bid function is increasing. This shows that the strategy profile where all bidders follow this bid function is the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction (Theorem 1, Section 3.3). We also obtain simple lower and upper bounds of the equilibrium bid function. The paper is organized as follows. We present the basic framework of a kth price auction in Section 2. The analysis of equilibrium bids is presented in Section 3. Some proofs are presented in the Appendix. 2 The basic framework The basic framework draws on Chapters 2 and 3 of Krishna (2002). Results that will be useful for our analysis are summarized here to keep our presentation self contained. A single object is for sale in an auction. The set of bidders who bid for the object is N = {1, . . . , n}. For i ∈ N, let Xi be the value of the object for bidder i. Each Xi is independently and identically distributed (iid) on the interval [0, ω] where 0 < ω < ∞, each having an increasing distribution function F that has a continuous density f ≡ F ′ and has full support. Bidder i knows the realization xi of Xi, but it only knows that other bidders' values are iid, each following distribution F. Bidders simultaneously place bids. An auction is standard if the rules of the auction are such that the highest bidder wins the object and the payment the winner has to make depends solely on the submitted bids. Let n ≥ k ≥ 2. In a kth price auction, the highest bidder wins the object and pays the kth highest bid. Thus, a kth price auction is a standard auction. A key result that will be useful for our analysis is the revenue equivalence principle, which holds for any standard auction (see Proposition 3.1 of Krishna, 2002). A kth price auction results in a game among the n bidders where the strategy for bidder i is a function βi : [0, ω] → R+ which determines its bid for any value. A strategy profile specifies the strategy of each bidder, so it is given by (β 1, . . . , βn). A strategy profile is symmetric if all bidders have the same strategy in that profile. A symmetric strategy profile is increasing if the common strategy of that profile is an increasing function. Fix any bidder: say bidder n. For r = 1, . . . , n − 1, let Yr denote the rth highest value among the remaining n − 1 bidders, that is, Yr is the rth highest order statistic of X1, . . . , Xn−1. In particular, Y1 = max{X1, . . . , Xn−1}. Denoting by G the distribution function and g the density function of Y1, we have G(y) = F (y)n−1 and g(y) = (n − 1)F (y)n−2f (y) (1) The revenue equivalence principle implies that a symmetric, increasing strategy profile is an equilibrium of a kth price auction if and only if at that profile, for any value the expected payment of any bidder is the same as its expected payment in a second price auction. This result is formally stated in the next proposition. Proposition 1 For a kth price auction with n risk neutral bidders where n ≥ k ≥ 2, consider a symmetric, increasing strategy profile at which the common strategy of all 3 bidders is the function β : [0, ω] → R+. Denote by mβ(x) the expected payment of a bidder with value x at this profile. Then (i) mβ(0) = 0 and (ii) this strategy profile is an equilibrium of the kth price auction if and only if mβ(x) =Z x 0 yg(y)dy (2) Proof See the Appendix. Remark 1 Proposition 1 is closely related to Proposition 3.1 of Krishna (2002). The latter is a more general result which applies to all standard auctions (for example, they include all-pay-auctions) and there the condition mβ(0) = 0 is an assumption. Proposition 1 is specific to kth price auctions, which enables us to get mβ(0) = 0 as a result. 3 Equilibrium of a kth price auction Consider a symmetric, increasing strategy profile for a kth price auction at which the common strategy of all bidders is β : [0, ω] → R+. Consider a specific bidder, say bidder n. Let x ∈ (0, ω]. By the monotonicity of β, when bidder n has value x, at this strategy profile Pr(bidder n wins) = Pr(Y1 < x) = G(x). As the auction is kth price, when bidder n wins it has to pay the (k − 1)th highest of the remaining bids. So at this profile the expected payment of a bidder who has value x is given by mβ(x) = Pr(Y1 < x)E(β(Yk−1)Y1 < x) + Pr(Y1 ≥ x)0 = G(x)E(β(Yk−1)Y1 < x) (3) For y ≤ x, the density of Yk−1 conditional on Y1 < x is given by hk−1(yY1 < x) = n − 1 G(x)(cid:18)n − 2 k − 2(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]k−2F (y)n−kf (y) (4) See Lemma A1 in the Appendix for the derivation of the conditional density of order statistics. Taking m = n − 1 and r = k − 1 there gives (4). By (3) and (4) we have β(y)hk−1(yY1 < x)dy β(y)[F (x) − F (y)]k−2F (y)n−kf (y)dy (5) mβ(x) = G(x)Z x k − 2(cid:19)Z x 0 0 = (n − 1)(cid:18)n − 2 Using (1) in (2) of Proposition 1 and by (5), we conclude that for a kth price auction, a symmetric, increasing strategy profile with common strategy βk : [0, ω] → R+ is an equilibrium if and only if for all x ∈ [0, ω], the following3 hold: k − 2(cid:19)Z x (cid:18)n − 2 0 βk(y)[F (x) − F (y)]k−2F (y)n−kf (y)dy =Z x 0 3Note that for x = 0, both sides of (6) equal zero. yF (y)n−2f (y)dy (6) 4 Using (6), if we can determine βk and show that it is an increasing function, then we can conclude that it constitutes a symmetric, increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction. To this end, denote φ0(x) :=Z x 0 βk(y)[F (x) − F (y)]k−2F (y)n−kf (y)dy, ψ0(x) :=Z x 0 yF (y)n−2f (y)dy Then by (6), we have(cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1)φ0(x) = ψ0(x). Iteratively define φt+1(x) := and ψt+1(x) := φ′ t(x) f (x) ψ′ t(x) f (x) for t = 0, 1, . . . From (6)-(8), it follows that k − 2(cid:19)φt(x) = ψt(x) for t = 0, 1, . . . (cid:18)n − 2 Lemma 1 Let n ≥ 3. For k = 3, . . . , n, the following hold: φk−1(x) = (k − 2)!βk(x)F (x)n−k (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) Proof See the Appendix. From (9) and (10) it follows that βk(x) = ψk−1(x) (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1)(k − 2)!F (x)n−k Remark 2 Since F ′(x) = f (x), from (7) and (8), we have ψ1(x) = xF (x)n−2 and ψ2(x) = x(n − 2)F (x)n−3 + F (x)n−2/f (x). Then by (11) we have β2(x) = x, β3(x) = x + F (x) (n − 2)f (x) (12) As shown in Proposition C of Monderer and Tennenholtz (2000) and Proposition 3.2 of Krishna (2002), if F is log-concave, then F/f is an increasing function and so is β3. In that case the third price auction has a unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium where the common strategy of each bidder is β3 given in (12). In general, for k ≥ 3, we are able to determine ψk−1 for distributions where the density function f is linear, so that its first derivative is a constant and all derivatives of second or higher order are zero. For such distributions we obtain a closed form expression of ψk−1 in terms of Catalan numbers. Using (11), we can then also represent βk in terms of Catalan numbers. 5 3.1 Bid function in terms of Catalan numbers For non-negative integers ℓ = 0, 1, . . . , the ℓth Catalan number is given by Cℓ = 1 ℓ(cid:19) ℓ + 1(cid:18)2ℓ (13) In particular, C0 = C1 = 1. Note that for ℓ = 1, 2, . . . , Catalan numbers satisfy the recurrence relation Cℓ = 2(2ℓ − 1) ℓ + 1 Cℓ−1 Let n ≥ 3. For k = 3, . . . , n and ℓ = 0, 1, . . . , k − 3, define θk ℓ :=(cid:18) n − 2 k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)Cℓ 2ℓ From (14), the following recurrence relation holds for ℓ = 1, . . . , k − 3: θk+1 ℓ = 2ℓ − 1 ℓ + 1 θk ℓ−1 Since (n − k + ℓ + 1)(cid:0) n−2 k−3−ℓ(cid:1) = (k − 2 − ℓ)(cid:0) n−2 k−2−ℓ(cid:1), we have (n − k + ℓ + 1)θk ℓ = (k − 2 − ℓ)θk+1 ℓ (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) The relations (16) and (17) will be useful for our analysis. Now we are in a position to state the result that represents βk(x) in terms of Catalan numbers. Lemma 2 Let n ≥ 3. Suppose f ′(x) = a, where a is a constant. Then the following hold for k = 3, . . . , n: ψk−1(x) (k − 2)! k − 2(cid:19)xF (x)n−k + =(cid:18)n − 2 k−3Xℓ=0 (−1)ℓθk ℓ aℓ F (x)n−k+ℓ+1 f (x)2ℓ+1 where θk ℓ is given by (15). Consequently, if βk(x) satisfies (11), then βk(x) = x + (−1)ℓθk ℓ aℓ F (x)ℓ+1 f (x)2ℓ+1 k−3Xℓ=0 1 (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1) Proof Observe that (19) will be immediate from (18) by applying (11). We prove (18) by induction on k. First let k = 3. Since ψ1(x) = xF (x)n−2, we have ψ2(x)/0! = 1(x)/f (x) = (n − 2)xF (x)n−3 + F (x)n−2/f (x), which equals the right side of ψ2(x) = ψ′ (18) for k = 3 (since θ3 0 = 1). This shows the result holds for k = 3. In what follows, we show that if the result holds for k, it also holds for k + 1. Suppose ψk−1(x)/(k −2)! is given by (18). Denote the two terms on the right side of k−1(x)/f (x), (18) by τ1(x), τ2(x). Then ψk−1(x)/(k−2)! = τ1(x)+τ2(x). Since ψk(x) = ψ′ we have ψk(x) (k − 1)! = τ ′ 2(x) 1(x) + τ ′ (k − 1)f (x) 6 Note from (18) that τ ′ 1(x) f (x) k − 2(cid:19)x(n − k)F (x)n−k−1 +(cid:18)n − 2 =(cid:18)n − 2 k − 1(cid:19)xF (x)n−k−1 + θk+1 = (k − 1)(cid:18)n − 2 0 k − 2(cid:19)F (x)n−k f (x) F (x)n−k f (x) (21) Now consider the second term of (18). Since f ′(x) = a, we have τ ′ 2(x) f (x) = k−3Xℓ=0 (−1)ℓθk ℓ aℓ (n − k + ℓ + 1)F (x)n−k+ℓ f (x)2ℓ+1 (−1)ℓθk ℓ aℓ+1 (−1)(2ℓ + 1)F (x)n−k+ℓ+1 f (x)2ℓ+3 + k−3Xℓ=0 Note from (17) that (n − k + ℓ + 1)θk j = ℓ + 1 in the second sum of above, the expression above equals ℓ = (k − 2 − ℓ)θk+1 ℓ . Using this and denoting (−1)ℓ(k − 2 − ℓ)θk+1 ℓ k−3Xℓ=0 aℓ F (x)n−k+ℓ f (x)2ℓ+1 + k−2Xj=1 (−1)j(2j − 1)θk j−1aj F (x)n−k+j f (x)2j+1 By (16), (k − 2 − ℓ)θk+1 equals ℓ + (2ℓ − 1)θk ℓ−1 = (k − 1)θk+1 ℓ . Using this, the expression above (k − 2)θk+1 0 F (x)n−k f (x) + (k − 1) +(−1)k−2(2k − 5)θk aℓ F (x)n−k+ℓ f (x)2ℓ+1 ℓ (−1)ℓθk+1 k−3Xℓ=1 k−3ak−2 F (x)n−2 f (x)2k−3 Taking ℓ = k−2 in (16), we have (2k−5)θk above, we have k−3 = (k−1)θk+1 k−2. Using this in the expression τ ′ 2(x) f (x) = (k − 2)θk+1 0 F (x)n−k f (x) + (k − 1) From (20), (21) and (22), we have (−1)ℓθk+1 ℓ k−2Xℓ=1 aℓ F (x)n−k+ℓ f (x)2ℓ+1 (22) ψk(x) (k − 1)! k − 1(cid:19)xF (x)n−k−1 + =(cid:18)n − 2 k−2Xℓ=0 (−1)ℓθk+1 ℓ aℓ F (x)n−k+ℓ f (x)2ℓ+1 This shows if the result holds for k, it also holds for k + 1. Since the result holds for k = 3, we conclude that the result holds for all k = 3, . . . , n. Remark 3 On the basis of Lemma 2, we cannot conclude that βk obtained in (19) constitutes an equilibrium of the kth price auction. Such a conclusion can be made only when the resulting βk is an increasing function. Consider the case of a uniform 7 distribution on [0, ω]. Then F (x) = x/ω, f (x) = 1/ω and f ′(x) = 0. Taking a = 0 in (19) and using (15), in that case we have βk(x) = x + θk 0 F (x) f (x) 1 (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1) = x +(cid:0)n−2 k−3(cid:1) (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1) x = x + k − 2 n − k + 1 x (23) Since βk given in (23) is indeed an increasing function for n ≥ k ≥ 2, we conclude that when values are iid and uniformly distributed, then the strategy profile with common strategy βk given by (23) is the unique symmetric increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction. This result was obtained in Kagel and Levin (1993, p.878). Since F (0) = 0, the general form of distribution function on [0, ω] that has f ′(x) = a is F (x) = ax2/2 + bx. For non-uniform distributions (i.e., a 6= 0), we are able to verify monotonicity of βk given in (19) (and consequently conclude βk constitutes an equilibrium of the kth price auction) for distributions where b = 0, that is, when F (x) = ax2/2. We obtain this result by two key techniques: (i) using an integral representation of Catalan numbers and (ii) applying some classical combinatorial identities. Let us first state the results on Catalan numbers and combinatorics that will be used in our analysis. 3.2 Results on Catalan numbers and combinatorics Catalan numbers have the following integral representation (see equation (10) of Penson and Sixdeniers, 2001): Cℓ = 1 2πZ 4 0 uℓr4 − u u du = 22ℓ+1 π Z 1 0 tℓr 1 − t t dt (24) where the second equality follows by substituting t = u/4. Now we state three fundamental combinatorial identities. For our purpose, in all of these identities, s is any non-negative integer, m is any positive real number and r, z are any real numbers. The first is Jensen's identity (see equation (4.1) of Gould and Quaintance, 2010; equation (1) of Guo, 2011): The second is Hagen-Rothe's identity (see equation (17) of Gould, 1956; equation (2) of Chu, 2010):4 sXℓ=0(cid:18)m + zℓ s − ℓ(cid:19) = ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)r − zℓ s − ℓ (cid:19)zℓ sXℓ=0(cid:18)m + r − ℓ s (cid:19) s − ℓ(cid:19) =(cid:18)m + r ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)r − zℓ sXℓ=0(cid:18)r + 1 s − ℓ(cid:19)(z − 1)ℓ m m + zℓ(cid:18)m + zℓ sXℓ=0 sXℓ=0(cid:18)r − ℓ s − ℓ(cid:19)zℓ = (25) (26) (27) The third identity is related to Jensen's identity (see the first equation in p.204, Guo, 2011): 4Gould (1956) proves a more general result. Taking p = y, q = −β in equation (17) of Gould (1956) gives the identity of (26). 8 3.3 Equilibrium for a non-uniform distribution Let F (x) = ax2/2, where a is a positive constant. Then f (x) = ax and f ′(x) = a > 0, so the condition of Lemma 2 holds. In this case we have aℓF (x)ℓ+1/f (x)2ℓ+1 = (1/2)ℓ+1x and by (19) it follows that βk(x) = x + (−1)ℓ θk 2ℓ+1 ℓ k−3Xℓ=0 (28) x (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1) Thus in this case βk(x) is linear with βk(0) = 0. We show that the function βk is increasing and therefore it is an equilibrium of the kth price auction. We show that the function βk is increasing and therefore it is an equilibrium of the kth price auction. Theorem 1 Let n ≥ 3 and k = 3, . . . , n. Consider a kth price auction with n risk neutral bidders. Suppose values are iid on [0, ω] with distribution function F (x) = ax2/2 where a > 0. Then the following hold. (i) The strategy profile where each bidder has the common strategy βk : [0, ω] → R+ given by (28) is the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction. (ii) If n is sufficiently large compared to k (specifically, n + 4 > 2k), then x + k − 2 2(n − 2) x ≤ βk(x) ≤ x + 7(k − 2) 8(n − 2) x (29) Proof (i) Since for F (x) = ax2/2, the function βk given in (28) is the unique solution to (11), if we can show βk is an increasing function, it will prove that the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction has the common strategy βk for each bidder. To show this, denote Ωk := k−3Xℓ=0 Note from (28) that (−1)ℓ θk ℓ 2ℓ+1 = (−1)ℓ(cid:18) n − 2 k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19) Cℓ 22ℓ+1 k−3Xℓ=0 (30) (31) Using the integral representation (24) in (30) and then making the transformation z = 1 − t, we have x 0 βk(x) = x + (cid:0)n−2 k−2(cid:1)Ωk k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)"Z 1 dt# (−t)ℓr 1 − t k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18) n − 2 (z − 1)ℓr z k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)(cid:20)Z 1 k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18) n − 2 dz(cid:21) 1 − z 1 π t Ωk = = 1 π 0 9 Switching the orders of summation and integration we have Ωk = 1 1 − z" k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18) n − 2 0 r z πZ 1 k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)(z − 1)ℓ# dz Taking r = n − 3, s = k − 3 in (27) we have By (32) and (33) we have k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)(z − 1)ℓ = k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)zℓ k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)n − 3 − ℓ k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18) n − 2 k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)zℓ# dz 1 − z" k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)n − 3 − ℓ 0 r z πZ 1 Ωk = 1 (32) (33) (34) Since n ≥ k ≥ 3, the sum on the right side of (33) is positive for all z ∈ (0, 1). So by (34), Ωk is also positive. Then by (31) it follows that βk is an increasing function, which proves that the strategy profile with common strategy βk is the unique symmetric, increasing equilibrium of the kth price auction. (ii) First note that for k = 3, the inequalities of (29) are immediate from (12) (in fact, for k = 3, the lower bound of (29) holds with equality). So let n ≥ 4 and k = 4, . . . , n. Taking s = k − 3, r = n − 3 − m in (25) (Jensen's identity) for any m > 0 we have k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)n − 3 − ℓ k − 3 − ℓ(cid:19)zℓ = k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ (35) For z ∈ [0, 1], let δ(z) := (k − 3)(1 − z) − 1 and η(z) := n − 2 − (k − 3)z. If n + 4 > 2k, then η(1) = n−k + 1 > δ(0) + 1 = k −3 > 0. Fix m ∈ (δ(0) + 1, η(1)). Since δ(z) ≤ δ(0) and η(1) ≤ η(z), for such m, we have δ(z) < m < η(z) for all z ∈ [0, 1]. We can express each term of the right side of (35) using the the gamma function as follows (note that Γ(t) > 0 for all t > 0): ℓ (cid:19) = (cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) = (cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ Γ(m + zℓ + 1) Γ(ℓ + 1)Γ(m − (1 − z)ℓ + 1) and Γ(n − 2 − m − zℓ) Γ(k − 2 − ℓ)Γ(n − k − m + (1 − z)ℓ + 1) (36) For all ℓ = 0, 1, . . . , k−3, we have m−(1−z)ℓ+1 ≥ m−(1−z)(k−3)+1 = m−δ(z) > 0 and hence Γ(m−(1 −z)ℓ + 1) > 0. We also have n−2 −m−zℓ ≥ n−2 −m−z(k −3) = η(z) − m > 0 and hence Γ(n − 2 − m − zℓ) > 0. Finally n − k − m + (1 − z)ℓ + 1 ≥ n − k + 1 − m = η(1) − m > 0 and hence Γ(n − k − m + (1 − z)ℓ + 1) > 0. This shows that for fixed m ∈ (δ(0) + 1, η(1)), every term in the sum of the right side of (35) is positive for all z ∈ [0, 1]. So we have k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) = ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ k−3Xℓ=0 10 m + zℓ m + zℓ(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ ≤ k−3Xℓ=0 m + z(k − 3) m + zℓ (cid:18)m + zℓ (cid:21) k−3Xℓ=0 m (cid:21)(cid:18)n − 3 k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ m + zℓ(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3(cid:19) k − 3(cid:19) < (1 + z)(cid:18)n − 3 z(k − 3) m m =(cid:20)m + z(k − 3) =(cid:20)1 + (37) where the second last equality follows by taking s = k − 3 and r = n − 3 − m in (26) (Hagen-Rothe's identity) and the last inequality follows by noting that m > δ(0) + 1 = k − 3. Thus (37) gives an upper bound for the sum of (35). Similarly we can obtain a lower bound for the sum by noting that k−3Xℓ=0(cid:18)m + zℓ m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) = ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ m + zℓ(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ m + zℓ(cid:18)m + zℓ k − 3(cid:19) k − 3 − ℓ (cid:19) =(cid:18)n − 3 ℓ (cid:19)(cid:18)n − 3 − m − zℓ k−3Xℓ=0 m ≥ k−3Xℓ=0 (38) where the last equality again follows by (26). Using the bounds from (37)-(38), by (34) and (35) we have that 1 − z Z 1 0 r z Z 1 (1 + z)r z (cid:0)n−3 k−3(cid:1)π dz ≤ Ωk ≤ (cid:0)n−3 k−3(cid:1)π 0 (1 + z)pz/(1 − z)dz = 7π/8, it follows 0 pz/(1 − z)dz = π/2 and R 1 Noting that R 1 k − 3(cid:19) ≤ Ωk ≤ k − 3(cid:19) 8(cid:18)n − 3 2(cid:18)n − 3 k−2(cid:1) = (k−2)/(n−2), the result of (29) follows by applying the inequalities k−3(cid:1)/(cid:0)n−2 Since(cid:0)n−3 of (39) in (31). 1 − z (39) dz 1 7 0 Appendix Lemma A1 (Conditional density of order statistics) Suppose X1, . . . , Xm are iid random variables on the interval [0, ω], each having an increasing distribution function F that has a continuous density f ≡ F ′ and has full support. Denote by Yr the rth highest order statistic of X1, . . . , Xm. Let x > 0 and y ≤ x. Then for r = 1, . . . , m, the density of Yr conditional on Y1 < x is hr(yY1 < x) = m G(x)(cid:18)m − 1 r − 1(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]r−1F (y)m−rf (y) (40) where G is the distribution function of Y1. 11 Proof Denote by Hr the distribution function of Yr conditional on Y1 < x, that is, Hr(yY1 < x) = Pr(Yr ≤ yY1 < x) = Pr(Yr ≤ y, Y1 < x) Pr(Y1 < x) = Pr(Yr ≤ y, Y1 < x) G(x) (41) The event (Yr ≤ y) is the union of r mutually exclusive events as follows: (Yr ≤ y) = (Yr ≤ y < Yr−1) ∪ (Yr−1 ≤ y < Yr−2) ∪ . . . ∪ (Y2 ≤ y < Y1) ∪ (Y1 ≤ y) Since y ≤ x, we have (Y1 ≤ y, Y1 < x) = (Y1 ≤ y), so that = [∪r−1 t=1 (Yt+1 ≤ y < Yt)] ∪ (Y1 ≤ y) (Yr ≤ y, Y1 < x) = [∪r−1 t=1 (Yt+1 ≤ y < Yt, Y1 < x)] ∪ (Y1 ≤ y) Hence Pr(Yr ≤ y, Y1 < x) = Noting that r−1Xt=1 Pr(Yt+1 ≤ y < Yt, Y1 < x) + Pr(Y1 ≤ y) (42) (Yt+1 ≤ y < Yt, Y1 < x) = (y < Yj < x for j = 1, . . . , t; Yj ≤ y for j = t + 1, . . . , m) we have Pr(Yt+1 ≤ y < Yt, Y1 < x) =(cid:18)m Since Pr(Y1 ≤ y) = F (y)m, by (41), (42) and (43) we have G(x)Hr(yY1 < x) = Pr(Yr ≤ y, Y1 < x) = t(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]tF (y)m−t r−1Xt=0(cid:18)m t(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]tF (y)m−t (43) (44) Note that the conditional density hr(yY1 < x) is the derivative of the conditional distribution function Hr(yY1 < x) with respect to y. Also note that F ′(y) = f (y). So from (44) we have = r−1Xt=0(cid:18)m = mf (y) = mf (y) d dy G(x)hr(yY1 < x) = t(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]tF (y)m−t r−1Xt=0(cid:18)m t(cid:19)t[F (x)−F (y)]t−1f (y)F (y)m−t r−1Xt=1(cid:18)m t(cid:19)[F (x)−F (y)]t(m−t)F (y)m−t−1f (y)− r−1Xt=0(cid:18)m − 1 t (cid:19)[F (x)−F (y)]tF (y)m−1−t−mf (y) r−1Xt=1(cid:18)m − 1 t − 1(cid:19)[F (x)−F (y)]t−1F (y)m−t r−2Xj=0(cid:18)m − 1 j (cid:19)[F (x)−F (y)]j F (y)m−1−j r−1Xt=0(cid:18)m − 1 t (cid:19)[F (x)−F (y)]tF (y)m−1−t−mf (y) r − 1(cid:19)[F (x) − F (y)]r−1F (y)m−rf (y) = m(cid:18)m − 1 12 This completes the proof. Proof of Proposition 1 (i) Consider a specific bidder, say bidder n. By the mono- tonicity of β it follows that at this strategy profile when bidder n has value x, it wins the object if and only if Y1 < x, so Pr(1 wins) = Pr(Y1 < x) = G(x). Since G(0) = 0, when bidder n has value 0, it wins with probability zero. Since a bidder makes no payment if it does not win, we conclude that mβ(0) = 0. and only if Y1 < z, so Pr(bidder n wins) = Pr(Y1 < z) = G(z). bidder n has value x and it bids b = β(z) while all other bidders follow the strategy β (ii) For z ∈ [0, ω], denote by emβ(z, x) the expected payment of bidder n when (note that emβ(x, x) = mβ(x)). By the monotonicity of β, in this case bidder n wins if Since a bidder makes no payment if it does not win, we have emβ(0, x) = 0. Note that emβ(0, x) does not depend on bidder n's value x, so we have emβ(0, x) = emβ(0, 0) = First let z = 0. Since G(0) = 0, in this case bidder n wins with probability zero. Next consider z > 0. As the auction is kth price, in the event bidder n wins, it has mβ(0) = 0. to pay the (k − 1)-th highest of the remaining bids, so we have emβ(z, x) = Pr(Y1 < z)E(β(Yk−1)Y1 < z) + Pr(Y1 ≥ z)0 = G(z)E(β(Yk−1)Y1 < z) Again observe that emβ(z, x) does not depend on bidder n's value x, so we have emβ(z, x) = emβ(z, z) = mβ(z). it bids b = β(z) while all other bidders follow the strategy β. Since emβ(z, x) = mβ(z), Denote by πβ(z, x) the expected payoff of bidder n when bidder n has value x and we have (45) πβ(z, x) = G(z)x − emβ(z, x) = G(z)x − mβ(z) We prove (ii) by using (45). Proof of the "if part" of (ii) Suppose the strategy profile where all bidders have the common strategy β is an equilibrium. Then for any x ∈ (0, ω), we must have πβ(x, x) ≥ πβ(z, x) for all z ∈ [0, ω]. So the following first-order condition must hold: ∂πβ(z, x) ∂z [z = x] = 0 Note from (45) that ∂πβ(z, x)/∂z = g(z)x − dmβ(z)/dz. Then by the first order condi- 0 yg(y)dy = mβ(x)−mβ(0). tion, for all y ∈ (0, ω) we have g(y)y = dmβ(y)/dy. HenceR x Then (2) follows by noting that mβ(0) = 0. Proof of the "only if part" of (ii) To prove the "only if part", suppose the strategy profile where all bidders have the common strategy β satisfies (2). At this profile, for any x ∈ [0, ω], a bidder who has value x obtains expected payoff πβ(x, x). If this bidder unilaterally deviates and bids b = β(z) for some z ∈ [0, ω], it would obtain πβ(z, x). By (45) and (2) we have πβ(x, x) − πβ(z, x) = x[G(x) − G(z)] −Z x 0 yg(y)dy +Z z 0 yg(y)dy 13 Note that G is non-decreasing. If z ≥ x, then by (46) we have Integration by parts givesR t 0 yg(y)dy = tG(t) −R t πβ(x, x) − πβ(z, x) = −xG(z) +Z x πβ(x, x) − πβ(z, x) = (z − x)G(z) −Z z πβ(x, x) − πβ(z, x) =Z x x z If z < x, then by (46) we have G(y)dy − (x − z)G(z) ≥Z x z 0 G(y)dy. So we have 0 G(y)dy + zG(z) −Z z G(y)dy ≥ (z − x)G(z) −Z z x 0 G(y)dy (46) G(z)dy = 0 G(z)dy − (x − z)G(z) = 0 Thus πβ(x, x) ≥ πβ(z, x) for all z ∈ [0, ω]. This shows any unilateral deviation to a bid b where b = β(z) for some z ∈ [0, ω] is not gainful. If a bidder with value x unilaterally deviates to a bid b < β(0), then the probability that it will win is zero and its expected payoff is also zero. Since πβ(x, x) ≥ πβ(0, x) = 0, such a deviation is not gainful. Finally if a bidder with value x unilaterally deviates to a bid b > β(ω), then its expected payment is Pr(β(Y1) < b)E(β(Yk−1)β(Y1) < b). Since b > β(ω) and Pr(Y1 < ω) = G(ω) = 1, we have Pr(β(Y1) < b) = G(ω) = 1 and E(β(Yk−1)β(Y1) < b) = E(β(Yk−1)Y1 < ω). This shows its expected payment is mβ(ω) and expected payoff is πβ(ω, x). Since πβ(x, x) ≥ πβ(ω, x), such a deviation is also not gainful. This proves that if an increasing, symmetric strategy profile with common strategy β satisfies (2), then this profile is an equilibrium. The following lemma will be useful to prove Lemma 1. Lemma A2 Let n ≥ k ≥ 3. For t = 2, . . . , k and ℓ = 0, 1, . . . , k − t, let λℓ,t :=(cid:0)k−t ℓ (cid:1), βk(y)F (y)n−k+ℓf (y)dy, Φt(x) := (−1)ℓλℓ,tF (x)k−t−ℓγℓ(x) (47) γℓ(x) :=Z x 0 k−tXℓ=0 Then for t = 2, . . . , k − 1, the following hold: Φ′ t(x)/f (x) = (k − t)Φt+1(x). Proof Note that F ′(x) = f (x). Also note that since γ ′ have F (x)k−t−ℓγ ′ ℓ(x)/f (x) = βk(x)F (x)n−t. Using these, by (47) we have ℓ(x) = βk(x)F (x)n−k+ℓf (x), we (−1)ℓλℓ,t(k − t − ℓ)F (x)k−t−ℓ−1γℓ(x) +βk(x)F (x)n−t (−1)ℓλℓ,t + (−1)k−tλk−t,tβk(x)F (x)n−t Φ′ t(x) f (x) = k−t−1Xℓ=0 k−t−1Xℓ=0 Since (k − t − ℓ)λℓ,t = (k − t)λℓ,t+1 the expression above equals (k − t) (−1)ℓλℓ,t+1F (x)k−t−1−ℓγℓ(x) + βk(x)F (x)n−t k−t−1Xℓ=0 (−1)ℓλℓ,t k−tXℓ=0 14 The result follows by noting that the first sum above is (k − t)Φt+1(x) and the second sum is zero. Proof of Lemma 1 Recall that βk(y)[F (x) − F (y)]k−2F (y)n−kf (y)dy 0 φ0(x) :=Z x βk(y)" k−2Xℓ=0 So we have φ0(x) =Z x ℓ (cid:19)F (y)ℓF (x)k−2−ℓ# F (y)n−kf (y)dy Changing the order of summation and integration, noting that λℓ,t =(cid:0)k−t the functions γℓ(x), Φt(x) from (47), we have (−1)ℓ(cid:18)k − 2 0 ℓ (cid:1), and using φ0(x) = k−2Xℓ=0 (−1)ℓλℓ,2F (x)k−2−ℓγℓ(x) = Φ2(x) Using Lemma A2, we have φ1(x) = φ′ applying Lemma A2: φ2(x) = φ′ Using this reasoning after k − 2 steps gives 0(x)/f (x) = Φ′ 1(x)/f (x) = (k − 2)Φ′ 2(x)/f (x) = (k − 2)Φ3(x). Again 3(x)/f (x) = (k − 2)(k − 3)Φ4(x). φk−2(x) = (k − 2) × . . . × 1 × Φk(x) = (k − 2)!Φk(x) Note by (47) that Φk(x) = γ0(x) = R x 0(x) = βk(x)F (x)n−kf (x). Hence φk−1(x) = φ′ γ ′ (k − 2)!βk(x)F (x)n−k. 0 βk(y)F (y)n−kf (y)dy. This implies Φ′ k−2(x)/f (x) = (k − 2)!Φ′ k(x) = k(x)/f (x) = Acknowledgements For helpful comments and suggestions, we are most grateful to an anonymous reviewer and Tsogbadral Galaabaatar. References [1] Chu, W. 2010. Elementary proofs for convolution identities of Abel and Hagen- Rothe, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 17, #N24 [2] Gardner, M. 1976. Catalan numbers: an integer sequence that materializes in unexpected places, Scientific American, 234(6):120-125 [3] Gould, H.W. 1956. Some generalizations of Vandermonde's convolution, American Mathematical Monthly, 63:84-91 [4] Gould, H.W., Quaintance, J. 2010. Combinatorial Table II: Advanced Techniques for Summing Finite Series. (from the seven unpub- lished manuscripts of H.W. Gould edited and compiled by J. Quaintance) http://www.math.wvu.edu/~gould/Vol.5.PDF Identities: 15 [5] Guo, V.W.J. 2011. Jensen's and related combinatorial identities, Applicable Anal- ysis and Discrete Mathematics, 5:201-211 [6] Kagel, J.H., Levin, D. 1993. Independent private value auctions: bidders behavior in first-, second- and third-price auction with varying numbers of bidders, Eco- nomic Journal, 103:868-879 [7] Krishna, V. 2002. Auction Theory, Academic Press [8] Mathews, T., Schwartz, J.A. 2017. A note on k-price auctions with complete information when mixed strategies are allowed, Economics Letters, 153:6-8 [9] Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M. 2000. k-price auctions, Games and Economic Be- havior, 31:220-244 [10] Myerson, R. 1981. Optimal auction design, Mathematics of Operations Research, 6:58-73 [11] Pak, I. 2015. History of Catalan numbers. In: Catalan Numbers by R.P. Stanley, Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-190 (Appendix B) [12] Penson, K., Sixdeniers J.-M. 2001. Integral representation of Catalan and related numbers, Journal of Integer Sequences, 4:Article 01.2.5 [13] Riley, J., Samuelson, W. 1981. Optimal auctions, American Economic Review, 71:381-392 [14] Sloane, N.J.A. The On-line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences https://oeis.org [15] Stanley, R.P. 2015. Catalan Numbers, Cambridge University Press [16] Tauman, Y. 2002. A note on k-price auctions with complete information,Games and Economic Behavior, 41: 161-164 [17] Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders, Journal of Finance, 16:8-37 [18] Vickrey, W. 1962. Auctions and bidding games. In: Recent Advances in Game Theory, Princeton Conference Series, 29, Princeton University Press, pp. 15-27 16
1810.10287	1	1810	2018-10-24T10:54:41	The Losses from Integration in Matching Markets can be Large	[ "econ.TH" ]	Although the integration of two-sided matching markets using stable mechanisms generates expected gains from integration, I show that there are worst-case scenarios in which these are negative. The losses from integration can be large enough that the average rank of an agent's spouse decreases by 37.5% of the length of their preference list in any stable matching mechanism.	econ.TH	econ	The Losses from Integration in Matching Markets can be Large Josu´e Ortega Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany. Abstract Although the integration of two-sided matching markets using stable mecha- nisms generates expected gains from integration, I show that there are worst case scenarios in which these are negative. The losses from integration can be large enough that the average rank of an agent's spouse decreases by 37.5% of the length of their preference list in any stable matching mechanism. social integration, large matching markets, spouse ranking, Keywords: assignment schemes, replica economies. JEL Codes: C78. Email address: [email protected] Preprint resubmitted to Economics Letters October 25, 2018 1. Introduction The theory of two-sided matching has been helpful to analyze and improve the allocation of goods without money, such as the assignment of students to public schools or of kidneys available for transplantation to patients in need. In particular, a recent branch of the literature has focused on understand- ing why small matching markets struggle to integrate into large centralized clearinghouses. For example, Ashlagi and Roth (2014) and Agarwal et al. (2018) document that American hospitals refrain to disclose their available kidneys for transplantation to centralized clearinghouses and even refrain to join them at all (62% of kidney exchange transplants are within hospital transplants that are not facilitated by a centralized clearinghouse). Similarly, Ekmekci and Yenmez (2018) show that schools have incentives to conduct their own independent admissions instead of joining a centralized admission system. In both cases, the failure of integration has important consequences: if all hospitals were fully integrated into a centralized kidney exchange program, they would be able to conduct more transplants and thus would save more lives. Similarly, the integration of school admissions into a unified process would reduce both the number of vacant seats in schools and the number of unassigned students, while at the same time reducing the severe racial segregation within school districts (Hafalir and Yenmez, 2017). The aforementioned articles document several reasons of why matching markets fail to integrate when doing so could generate welfare gains (and estimations suggest that in some markets the gains from integration are sub- stantial, as in the case of kidney exchange in US (Agarwal et al., 2018)). In this paper, I show theoretically that, in worst-case scenarios, matching mar- kets may fail to integrate because doing so would inevitable generate welfare losses in a well-defined sense. This worst-case result is somewhat surprising since the integration of two-sided matching markets never harms more people than those it benefits ex-post and generates expected welfare gains for both sides of the market (Ortega, 2018). In my framework, there are κ disjoint Gale-Shapley matching problems, each of size n. Agents are first assigned a spouse within their community so that the matching in each market is stable. Then all communities integrate as a society and a stable matching is realized again, now allowing agents to marry any agent of opposite gender in the society. I measure the individual gains from integration as the difference in the spouse ranking before and after integration occurs. This is, if an agent obtains his 5th best partner before integration and his 2nd best after integration, there is a difference in ranking of +3 and this agent experiences gains from integration. The spouse 2 ranking is a common welfare measure in matching markets (Wilson, 1972; Pittel, 1989; Ashlagi et al., 2017). Similarly, the total gains from integration of a society are the sum of the gains from integration of each of its agents. The sum of spouse rankings is a natural welfare measure previously studied by Knuth (1976, 1996) and Knoblauch (2009) to analyze the properties of random markets. Thus, the sum of individual gains from integration is an intuitive way to measure the degree to which integration is perceived as favourable. I show with an example that in specific matching markets the gains from integration can be negative. By providing an algorithm on how to create replicas of a matching problem, I show that the losses from integration can be made large enough that on average the ranking of each agent's spouse decreases by 3 8 of the length of their preference list, equivalent to a welfare reduction of 37.5%. 2. Model A community C is a set of n men and n women. There are κ disjoint communities. Given a set of communities, the society S is the set of all communities. A population P ⊆ S is a set of communities in S. M P and W P denote the sets of men and women in each community C ∈ P . Ci denotes the i-th community and mi j denotes the j-th man of community Ci. I use the same notation for women wi j and omit indexes whenever no confusion arises. Each man m (resp. woman w) has strict preferences over the set of all women in the society W S (resp. men M S). I assume for exposition that all potential partners are desirable. I write w ≻m w′ to denote that m prefers w to w′. Given a population P , I call ≻P := (≻x)x∈(M P ∪W P ) a preference profile of the agents belonging to the communities in P . An extended matching problem (EMP) is a triple (M S, W S; ≻S). Given a population P , a matching µ : (W P ∪ M P ) 7→ (W P ∪ M P ) is a function of order two (µ2(x) = x) such that if µ(m) 6= m, then µ(m) ∈ W P , and if µ(w) 6= w, then w ∈ M P . An agent is matched to himself if he remains unmatched. A matching scheme σ : (M S ∪ W S) × 2S 7→ (M S ∪ W S) is a function that specifies a matching σ(·, P ) for every P ∈ 2S, i.e. σ(·, P ) : (M P ∪ W P ) 7→ (M P ∪ W P ). Here we will only be interested in σ(·, C) and σ(·, S) which denote the matching before and after integration occurs. Matching schemes are analogous to the concept of assignment schemes in cooperative game theory (Sprumont, 1990). A matching µ : (W P ∪ M P ) 7→ (W P ∪ M P ) is stable if there is no man m ∈ M P and no woman w ∈ W P that are not married to each other (µ(m) 6= w) such that w ≻m µ(m) and m ≻w µ(w). Any such pair (m, w) is 3 called a blocking pair. A matching scheme σ is stable if the matching σ(·, P ) is stable in every population P ⊆ S. The raw rank of a woman w in the preference order of a man m over all po- tential spouses in the society is defined by rk m(w) := (cid:12)(cid:12){w′ ∈ W S : w′ <m w}(cid:12)(cid:12). Similarly, rk w(m) denotes the raw rank of m in the preference order of w. Note that the length of each preference order is κn, i.e. each agent ranks κn different potential partners. As it will be more convenient, we will use the percentile ranking instead of the raw ranking, which is defined as rk m(w) := rk m(w) . Thus, if rk m(w) = κn, then rk m(w) = 1, meaning that the fraction of potential partners who are equally or more preferred than w by m is 1, i.e. everybody. κn The gains from integration for agent x under the matching scheme σ are defined as γx(σ) := rk M (σ(x, C)) − rk M (σ(x, S)). The total gains from integration are given by Γ(σ) := Px∈S γx. If these are negative, we speak of the total losses from integration. The average gains from integration are denoted by Γ(σ) = Γ(σ) 2κn . Note that Γ(σ) ∈ (−1, 1). 3. Results Unfortunately, integration produces total welfare losses in some EMPs if the matching before and after integration occurs is stable. Proposition 1. There exist EMPs such that Γ(σ) < 0 in any stable matching scheme. Proof. Let n = 2 and κ = 2. Consider the following preferences (pref- erences that remain unspecified are irrelevant; the partner obtained before integration appears in a circle, whereas the partner obtained after integration appears in a square): m1 m1 1 : w2 2 : w1 1 ≻ w1 2 1 ≻ w2 1 ≻ w1 2 m2 m2 1 : w1 2 : w2 1 ≻ w2 2 1 ≻ w1 1 ≻ w1 2 ≻ w2 2 w1 w1 1 : m2 2 : m1 1 ≻ m1 2 1 ≻ m2 1 ≻ m1 2 w2 w2 1 : m1 2 : m2 1 ≻ m2 2 1 ≻ m1 1 ≻ m1 2 ≻ m2 2 1, Ci) = wi In any stable matching σ(mi 1 for i ∈ {1, 2} because all agents get their most preferred partner inside their own com- munity and thus the matching σ(·, Ci) is stable. In any stable matching σ(mi 1 are the best possi- ble spouses for each other, and thus none of these agents could be in any 1 for i ∈ {1, 2}, i 6= j because mi 1, S) = wj 2 and σ(mi 2, Ci) = wi 1 and wj 4 2, S) = w1 blocking pair. Then σ(m1 2 because both get their best achievable partner among those remaining. Finally, σ(m2 2 so that both agents obtain their worst partner in S, yet no other partner prefers them over their current partner, and thus the matching σ(·, S) is stable. We conclude that the matching scheme σ is stable. 2, S) = w2 The gains from integration (in raw ranking terms) for men in this unique stable matching scheme are −3 rank positions, and by symmetry of the prob- lem the gains from integration (in raw ranking terms) for women are −3 as well. Normalizing them in percentile terms, we have that ΓS(σ) = − 6 4 and ΓS(σ) = − 3 16 . What drives the existence of welfare losses from integration in the pre- vious example is that agents' preferences are constructed so that those who benefit from integration (exactly half of the society) experience very small welfare gains (+1 in a raw rank measure). In contrast, those harmed by integration (the other half of the society) find themselves married to much less preferred partners. Neither the fact that exactly half of the society ex- periences losses from integration nor the particular way in which preferences were constructed are a coincidence, and we will return to this example in Proposition 3. A natural follow-up question is how big can total losses from integration be. A trivial upper bound is easy to compute. Proposition 2. Γ(σ) ≥ − 1 scheme. 2 + 1 κn in any EMP and any stable matching Proof. From Proposition 2 in Ortega (2018), we know that the number of agents who get hurt by integration is weakly lower than the number of agents who benefit from integration. The smallest gain from integration is (+1) in raw ranking terms. The largest loss from integration is (κn − 1) in raw ranking terms. Thus Γ(σ) ≥ κn( −κn + 1 κn ) + κn( 1 κn ) = −κn + 2 (1) and Γ(σ) ≥ − 1 2 + 1 κn . The term 1 and thus the inequality asymptotically becomes Γ(σ) ≥ − 1 2 . κn becomes negligible in large markets Expression 1 establishes that the total losses from integration could be such that the ranking of agents' spouses goes down by almost 50% of the length of their preference order, a very big loss which becomes even larger as the size of the market grows. However, the above upper bound is not achievable, because in the case of n = 2 and κ = 2 the greatest lower bound 5 16 instead of − 1 4 . for Γ(σ) is − 3 In the following Proposition, I provide an attainable bound on the losses from integration, which shows that the losses of integration can be substantial and do not vanish in large matching markets. Proposition 3. For any n and k even, there exists an EMP where Γ(σ) ≤ − 3 4κn in any stable matching scheme. 8 + 3 Proof. I show that one can generate such an EMP by cloning the society in the proof of Proposition 1. Cloning a matching problem was first done by Irving and Leather (1986) to establish an upper bound on the number of stable marriages. The approach of creating clones or replicas of an economy has been used to establish other properties of matchings in large markets (Wooders, 1998; Kojima and Manea, 2010; Azevedo and Hatfield, 2015; Liu and Pycia, 2016; He et al., 2018) and has a long tradition in economics since its use by Debreu and Scarf (1963) to prove the equivalence of the core and the competitive equilibrium in large markets. Clones are denoted by a prime symbol (i.e. the clone of agent mj i′) and the set of clone men and women are denoted by M ′ and W ′, respectively. i is denoted by mj I use the notation M + and W + to denote the men and women who benefit from integration. Similarly, the notation M − and W − denotes the men and women harmed by integration. The replication of the EMP will be such that the clone of each agent in M + ∪ W + will also be in M ′+ ∪ W ′+, and the clone of every agent in M − ∪ W − will be in M ′− ∪ W ′−. The preferences of the clones in M ′+ ∪ W ′+ will be isomorphic to those i prefers wh l f ′. The preferences of the clones in of the original agents in M + ∪ W +, meaning that if an agent mj over wp M ′+ ∪ W ′+ will be such that f , then agent mj i′ prefers wh l′ over wp 1. Their most preferred partner will be isomorphic to the one of the orig- inal agent. 2. Women will prefer any agents in M + ∪M ′+ over any agent in M − ∪M ′− (the same is true for men). 3. The preferences of women (resp. men) over M −∪M ′− (resp. W −∪W ′−) are lexicographic according to the following criteria: (a) Agent xi j is preferred to agent xh p if i < j (agents from communities with smaller indexes are preferred), (b) If both agents belong to the same community, agent xh i is preferred to agent xh j if i < j, (c) If both agents have the same sub- and superindices, then the orig- inal is preferred to the clone. 6 The EMP below shows the corresponding replica of the EMP in the proof of Proposition 1. m1 1 : w2 1′ : w2 2 : w1 2′ : w1 1 ≻ w1 2 1′ ≻ w1 2′ 1 ≻ W + ≻ w1 2 1′ ≻ W + ≻ w1 2 ≻ w1 2′ m1 m1 m1 m2 m2 m2 1 : w1 1′ : w1 2 : w2 2′ : w2 1 ≻ w2 2 1′ ≻ w2 2′ 1 ≻ W + ≻ w1 1′ ≻ W + ≻ w1 m2 2 ≻ w1 2 ≻ w1 2′ ≻ w2 2 2′ ≻ w2 2 ≻ w2 2′ w1 w1 w1 w1 1 : m2 1′ : m2 2 : m1 2′ : m1 1 ≻ m1 2 1′ ≻ m1 2′ 1 ≻ M + ≻ m1 2 1 ≻ M + ≻ m2 1 ≻ m1 2′ w2 w2 w2 1 : m1 1′ : m1 2 : m2 2′ : m2 1 ≻ m2 2 2′ ≻ m2 1′ 1 ≻ M + ≻ m2 1′ ≻ M + ≻ m2 w2 1 ≻ m1 1 ≻ m1 2′ ≻ m2 2 2′ ≻ m2 2 ≻ m2 2′ An identical argument to the one we used in the proof of Proposition 1 shows that the EMP above has a unique stable matching scheme, presented above using circles and squares. In such unique stable matching scheme, κn agents gain (+1) from integration in raw ranking terms, and κn agents have welfare losses ranging from κn/2 to κn − 1 also in raw ranking terms. The total gains from integration are therefore given by Γ(σ) = κn(cid:18) 1 κn(cid:19) − 2 κn [ = 1 − 2 κn [ (κn)2 4 = 1 − [ = 3 2 − + κn 4 κn 2 3 4 κn + − κn 2 + i] i] κn 2 −1 Xi=0 κn 2 −1 Xi=1 1 2 ] 8 + 3 And thus Γ(σ) = − 3 4κn becomes negligible in large markets and thus the total losses of integration can be made asymp- totically equivalent to − 3 8 , i.e. a 37.5% of the size of the agents' preference lists. 4κn . The constant term 3 7 4. Conclusion We can construct matching problems such that the sum of the individual gains from integration from all its agents is negative. We can make the problem arbitrarily large to show that the welfare losses remain significant even in large markets. In this article I have assumed that all communities have the same num- ber of men and women, an unrealistic assumption which I have introduced to simplify the analysis. Allowing communities to have different gender compo- sition would reduce the magnitude of welfare losses. To observe this, suppose a male-dominated community merges with a female-dominated one. In both communities some agents, who were unmatched before integration, are now able to find a partner in a more gender-balanced society. Those agents would experience welfare gains which are not covered in my analysis. I leave a more comprehensive study of integration of unbalanced matching markets for fur- ther research. Acknowledgements I acknowledge excellent research assistance by Alexander Sauer and Carlo Stern, and helpful comments from Yan Long, Gabriel Ziegler and an anony- mous referee. Sarah Fox proofread the paper. References References Agarwal, N., I. Ashlagi, E. Azevedo, C. R. Featherstone, and O. Karaduman (2018): "Market failure in kidney exchange," NBER preprint. Ashlagi, I., Y. Kanoria, and J. Leshno (2017): "Unbalanced random matching markets: The stark effect of competition," Journal of Political Economy, 125, 69 -- 98. Ashlagi, I. and A. Roth (2014): "Free riding and participation in large scale, multi-hospital kidney exchange," Theoretical Economics, 9, 817 -- 863. Azevedo, E. M. and J. W. Hatfield (2015): "Existence of equilibrium in large matching markets with complementarities," SSRN preprint. Debreu, G. and H. Scarf (1963): "A limit theorem on the core of an economy," International Economic Review, 4, 235 -- 246. 8 Ekmekci, M. and B. Yenmez (2018): "Integrating schools for centralized admissions," SSRN preprint. Hafalir, I. and B. Yenmez (2017): "Integrating school districts: Diver- sity, balance, and welfare," SSRN preprint. He, Y., A. Miralles, M. Pycia, and J. Yan (2018): "A pseudo-market approach to allocation with priorities," American Economic Journal: Mi- croeconomics, 10, 272 -- 314. Irving, R. and P. Leather (1986): "The complexity of counting stable marriages," SIAM Journal on Computing, 15, 655 -- 667. Knoblauch, V. (2009): "Marriage matching and gender satisfaction," So- cial Choice and Welfare, 32, 15 -- 27. Knuth, D. (1976): Mariages stables et leurs relations avec d'autres introduction `a l'analyse math´ematique des al- probl`emes combinatoires: gorithmes, Presses de l'Universit´e de Montr´eal. -- -- -- (1996): "An exact analysis of stable allocation," Journal of Algo- rithms, 20, 431 -- 442. Kojima, F. and M. Manea (2010): "Incentives in the probabilistic serial mechanism," Journal of Economic Theory, 145, 106 -- 123. Liu, Q. and M. Pycia (2016): "Ordinal efficiency, fairness, and incentives in large markets," SSRN preprint. Ortega, J. (2018): "Social integration in two-sided matching markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 78, 119 -- 126. Pittel, B. (1989): "The average number of stable matchings," SIAM Jour- nal on Discrete Mathematics, 2, 530 -- 549. Sprumont, Y. (1990): "Population monotonic allocation schemes for coop- erative games with transferable utility," Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 378 -- 394. Wilson, L. (1972): "An analysis of the stable marriage assignment algo- rithm," BIT Numerical Mathematics, 12, 569 -- 575. Wooders, J. (1998): "Matching and bargaining models of markets: approx- imating small markets by large markets," Economic Theory, 11, 215 -- 224. 9
1901.08932	1	1901	2019-01-23T21:09:16	Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners	[ "econ.TH" ]	Nowadays, we are surrounded by a large number of complex phenomena ranging from rumor spreading, social norms formation to rise of new economic trends and disruption of traditional businesses. To deal with such phenomena,Complex Adaptive System (CAS) framework has been found very influential among social scientists,especially economists. As the most powerful methodology of CAS modeling, Agent-based modeling (ABM) has gained a growing application among academicians and practitioners. ABMs show how simple behavioral rules of agents and local interactions among them at micro-scale can generate surprisingly complex patterns at macro-scale. Despite a growing number of ABM publications, those researchers unfamiliar with this methodology have to study a number of works to understand (1) the why and what of ABMs and (2) the ways they are rigorously developed. Therefore, the major focus of this paper is to help social sciences researchers,especially economists get a big picture of ABMs and know how to develop them both systematically and rigorously.	econ.TH	econ	Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners Hossein Sabzian ∗ Mohammad Ali Shafia † Ali Maleki ‡ Seyeed Mostapha Seyeed Hashemi § Ali Baghaei ¶ Hossein Gharib (cid:107) January 28, 2019 Abstract Nowadays, we are surrounded by a large number of complex phe- nomena such as virus epidemic, rumor spreading, social norms for- mation, emergence of new technologies, rise of new economic trends and disruption of traditional businesses. To deal with such phenom- ena, social scientists often apply reductionism approach where they reduce such phenomena to some lower-lever variables and model the relationships among them through a scheme of equations (e.g. Par- tial differential equations and ordinary differential equations). This reductionism approach which is often called equation based modeling (EBM) has some fundamental weaknesses in dealing with real world complex systems, for example in modeling how a housing bubble arises from a housing market, the whole market is reduced into some factors ∗Iran University of Science and Technology.hossein [email protected] †Iran University of Science and Technology.omidshafia@ iust.ac.ir ‡Sharif University of [email protected] §Tadbir Economic Development [email protected] ¶Tadbir Economic Development [email protected] (cid:107)Tadbir Consulting [email protected] 1 (i.e. economic agents) with unbounded rationality and often perfect information, and the model built from the relationships among such factors is used to explain the housing bubble while adaptability and the evolutionary nature of all engaged economic agents along with network effects go unaddressed. In tackling deficiencies of reduction- ism approach, in the past two decades, the Complex Adaptive Sys- tem (CAS) framework has been found very influential. In contrast to reductionism approach, under this framework, the socio-economic phenomena such as housing bubbles are studied in an organic manner where the economic agents are supposed to be both boundedly ratio- nal and adaptive. According to CAS framework, the socio-economic aggregates such as housing bubbles emerge out of the ways agents of a socio-economic system interact and decide. As the most power- ful methodology of CAS modeling, Agent-based modeling (ABM) has gained a growing application among academicians and practitioners. ABMs show how simple behavioral rules of agents and local interac- tions among them at micro-scale can generate surprisingly complex patterns at macro-scale. Despite a growing number of ABM publi- cations, those researchers unfamiliar with this methodology have to study a number of works to understand (1) the why and what of ABMs and (2) the ways they are rigorously developed. Therefore, the ma- jor focus of this paper is to help social sciences researchers get a big picture of ABMs and know how to develop them both systematically and rigorously. Keywords: Complexity, Reductionism, Equation-based modeling (EBM), Com- plex adaptive system (CAS), Agent-based Modeling (ABM). 1 Introduction A large number of social phenomena such as cultural changes, cooperation formation, innovation, norm formation, technology diffusion, and even evo- lution of states happen not just due to separate choices by constituent indi- viduals but mainly because of dynamic interactions among them over time. As a matter of fact, such phenomena have a nature entirely different from their constituents. Modeling the formation of these collective phenomena has been a great target for mainstream socio-economic modeling approach but it has not captured it sufficiently. This mainstream modeling approach which often called equation-based modeling (EBM) has been frequently used in different disciplines of social sciences. However, EBMs lack a needed func- tionality in explaining how the interactions among micro-components of a system can lead to an interestingly different macro-behavior for that system. 2 In fact, they perform very poorly in modeling the emergent properties of real-life systems, namely how a whole arises from the interactions among its simpler and lower-level parts so that it exhibits properties that its simpler and lower-level parts can never exhibit. For tackling such a limitation, the agent based models (ABMs) have been developed. An ABM is a kind of computational model which explores systems of multiple interacting agents which are spatially situated and evolve over the time. ABMs are highly effective in explaining how complex patterns emerge from micro-level rules during a period of time. In contrast to EBMs that are based on deductive reasoning, ABMs properly work not only as an inductive reasoning technique where a conclusion is formed from a series of observations but also as a pure form of abductive reasoning where the best explanation for the phenomena under study is inferred via simulation. ABMs have become a major modeling trend in a large number of domains ranging from spread of epidemics [1] and the threat of bio-warfare [2] to formation of norms [3], supply chain opti- mization [4 -- 6] and collaboration in project teams [7]. In contrast to EBMs which majorly focus on relationship among macro-variables of a system in top-down manner, ABMs try to model how local and predictable interactions among micro-components of a system can generate a complex system-level behavior [8]. ABM methodology is rooted in complexity theory and network science. In terms of complexity theory, ABMs are developed to explain how simple rules generate complex emergence (i.e. a process model) and in terms of network science ABMs are used to analyze the pattern that arise from agents interactions over the time (i.e. a pattern model) [9].In this paper, we want to explore ABMs systematically and show their great potentiality for modeling a large number of real world problems (with a special focus on social problems) that contemporary methods cannot model properly. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: the section 2 deals with why and what of ABMs.The unique characteristics of ABMs in comparison to EBMs are discussed in section 3. section 4 is concerned with main uses of ABMs.ABM building blocks are discussed in section 5. ABM development process is unraveled in section 6. Some critical considerations are offered in section 7.Two economics-related applications of ABMs are presented in section 8 and a conclusion is provided section 9. 2 Why and What of ABM We are living in complex world which itself includes an unlimited number of complexities ranging from highly micro-level complexities such as inter- acting atoms to highly macro-level ones such as nations. With an eye to 3 socio-economic organizations like banks, insurance companies, hospitals and automobile producers, it becomes clear that all of these organizations are in turn a type of complex system so that each of them owns a distinguished whole (or ensemble) beyond its constituent parts (or components). Complex systems should be considered different from complicated systems. Actually, a complex system includes multiple interacting components forming a whole irreducible to its parts, therefore, it doesnt lend itself to divide-and-conquer logic while a complicated system is composed of multiple related components forming a while reducible to its part and can be understood by divide-and- conquer logic. When a complex system is studied, the uncertainty of its outcomes never decreases to zero but as soon as a complicated system is analyzed and understood, the certainty of its outcomes increases to a large degree [10]. One example for illustrating the difference between a complex system and a complicated one is Figure1a and Figure1b. A car engine is assembled by several number of parts. When it is well understood by a team of experts, it can be decomposed and integrated over and over again without losing any of its expected functionalities.A car engine is assembled by several number of parts. When it is well understood by a team of experts, it can be decomposed and integrated over and over again without losing any of its ex- pected functionalities. In contrast, a team including a number of interacting persons can show a surprisingly unexpected performance even the experts disarrange it from its initial conditions and rearrange it completely the same as its prior initial conditions.1Complexity theory (CT) is an interdisciplinary filed of studying complex systems ranging from biophysical complex sys- tems such as molecules and organs to socio-economic complex systems such as small firms and multi-national corporations. According to CT, complex systems which absorb information from surrounding environment and accu- mulate knowledge that can help action are usually called complex adaptive systems (CASs). A CAS represents the notion of a system where The whole is more than the parts. Actually, these are systems where multiple and per- haps very simple parts interact in a nonlinear and non-trivial manner to give rise to global often unpredictable behaviors observable and discoverable at a higher level of abstraction [12]. A number of fundamental characteristics of CASs are listed in Table 1. In the domain of CASs modeling methodologies2 , ABMs as a micro-scale computational models3 have shown a much better performance than equation- 1It can be inferred that what Merton calls unintended consequences can just be observed in complex systems such as society [11] 2CAS modeling methodologies have been comprehensively discussed in [13] 3Microscale models form a broad class of computational models that simulate fine- scale details, in contrast with macroscale models, which amalgamate details into select 4 (a) An enginea ahttps://supamac.co.za/looking-inside-your-car-engine/ (b) A Team as a complex systema ahttp://www.parstimes.com/soccer/players.html Figure 1: Two different systems 5 based models (EBMs) such as analytical models and statistical modeling methods [4, 9, 16 -- 18]. Developed from the fields of complexity, cybernetics, cellular automata and computer science, ABMs have gained lots of popu- larity in the 1990s and shows a growing migration not only from equation based models (EBMs) such as econometric models, analytical models and statistical modeling techniques but also from the more classical simulation approaches such as the discrete-event simulation [19 -- 21]. ABMs have a wide range of application domains ranging from biological systems [1, 2] to en- gineered ones [22]. The primary reason widely held by ABM practitioners is its very high strength in modeling complex adaptive systems (CAS) in comparison with other modeling methods. Table 1: Fundamental characteristics of CASs constituent Characteristics Multiplicity heterogeneity of components Non-linear interac- tions Learnability adaptability Non-ergodicity and and Self-organization Emergence Co-evolution from equilib- Far rium Descriptions It is composed of a number of components usually called agent [9, 12].These agents can be very heterogeneous. Its agents interact with each other in a non-linear (non- additive) way [9, 12]. Its agents can adapt or learn [12] so agents can experience and accumulate knowledge. It is non-ergodic [23, 24].Therefore, it is highly sensitive to initial conditions. It self-organizes and its control is intensely distributed among its agents [9, 25]. It exhibits emergence [9, 12, 25]. It means, from the inter- actions of individual agents arises a global pattern or an aggregate behavior which is characteristically novel and irreducible to behavior(s) of agent(s). Its agents can co-evolve and change the systems behavior gradually [23]. It shows far from equilibrium phenomenon [26]. Isolated systems have a high tendency towards equilibrium and this will cause them to die. The far from equilibrium phenomenon shows how systems that are forced to ex- plore possibilities space will create different structures and novel patterns of relationships [9, 25].1 categories. Microscale and macroscale models can be used together to understand different aspects of the same problem [14, 15] 6 asymmetry Time and irreversibility It is time asymmetric and irreversible. One characteristic of a CAS is time asymmetry. Asymmetry in time oc- curs when a system passes a bifurcation point, a pivotal or decisional point where an option is taken over another or others, leading to time irreversibility. Irreversibility means that the system cannot be run backwards rewound or reversedso as to reach its exact initial conditions. Sys- tems which, when run in reverse, do not necessarily or typically return to their original state are said to be asym- metric in time [27], and asymmetry in time is important in testing for a complex adaptive system. If system-time is symmetric in both directions, then it is reversible, and it is not a CAS but a deterministic system. Complex adaptive systems are asymmetric in time, irreversible and nondeterministic. So, in a CAS one can neither predict nor retrodict, even with infinite information on initial con- ditions, because the system chooses its forward path. Its choice is indeterminate, a function of statistical probabil- ity rather than certainty [28]. Distributed control The behavior of a CAS is not controlled by a centralized mechanism, rather, it is completely distributed among its constituent parts. The interactions of these constituent parts cause a CAS to exhibit a coherent macro-level be- havior [25]. 1 In thermodynamics, systems that does not have any exchange of energy and matter with their surrounding environment are called isolated systems. Such systems have a tendency to evolve towards equilibrium. But, our sur- rounding is enriched by phenomena arising from conflations far from equilib- rium. Some examples can be turbulences, fractals and even life itself [29]. The philosophy of agent-based modeling comes directly from the idea that a CAS can be effectively modeled and explained by creating agents and en- vironment, characterizing behavioral rules of agents, and specifying interac- tions among them [9]. Modeling a CAS needs a specific type of methodology. EBMs such as statistical modeling techniques or PDEs lack a needed func- tionality for this purpose because they just decompose a system into its main parts and model the relationship among them (a top-down approach) while neglecting the fact that the system itself is entity beyond its constituent parts and it needs to be analyzed as an emergence of its constituent parts (a bottom-up approach). 7 3 Unique characteristics of ABMs in compar- ison with EBMs EBM and ABM have stemmed from two distinct epistemological frameworks. The former is grounded on reductionism approaches such as neoclassical eco- nomic theories (NET) where the issues such as unbounded rationality, perfect information, deductive reasoning and low-rate heterogeneity are discussed while the latter is built upon complexity theory (CT)where the issues such as bounded rationality, information asymmetry, network interaction, emer- gence and inductive reasoning are taken into consideration [30]. This has made ABMs specifically advantaged in modeling CASs. Some of these ad- vantages can be summarized as Table2 Table 2: Major advantages of ABM over EBM Advantage Bounded rational- ity Exhibition of emer- gence Description The environment in which agents interact is highly com- plex and unbounded rationality is not a viable assump- tion for it [9,30], agents have limited possibilities not only for receiving information but also for its processing. AB modelers contend that socio-economic systems have an in- herently non-stationary nature, due to continuous novelty (e.g., new patterns of aggregated behavior) endogenously introduced by the agents themselves [31]. Therefore, it is extremely difficult for agents to learn and adapt in such a turbulent and endogenously changing environments. On this basis, ABM researchers argue that assumption of un- bounded rationality is an unsuitable for modelling real world systems and agents should not only have bounded rationality but also adapt their expectations in different periods of time. Since ABMs can model how micro-dynamics result in a high-level macro-dynamic they can be used as the best method for exhibiting emergent properties. On this ba- sis, ABM does not require knowledge of the aggregate phenomena, in fact, researchers do not need to know what global pattern results from the individual behavior. When modeling an outcome variable with EBM, you need to have a good understanding of the aggregate behavior and then test out your hypothesis against the aggregate out- put [9]. 8 Bottom-up spective per- Heterogeneity and discrete nature Networked interac- tions: A macro-system is an outcome of the way its sub-systems interact so the properties of macro-dynamics can only be properly understood as the outcome of micro-dynamics involving basic entities/ agents [32]. This contrasts with the top-down nature of traditional neoclassical models, where the bottom level typically comprises a represen- tative individual and is constrained by strong consis- tency requirements associated with equilibrium and un- bounded rationality [8, 16]. Conversely, AB models de- scribe strongly heterogeneous agents living in complex systems that evolve through time [33, 34]. Therefore, aggregate properties are interpreted as emerging out of repeated interactions among simple entities rather than from the consistency requirements of rationality and equi- librium imposed by the modeler [35]. An ABM can nicely model a heterogeneous population, whereas equational models typically must make assump- tions of homogeneity. In many models, most notably in social science models, heterogeneity plays a key role. Furthermore, when you model individuals, the interac- tions and results are typically discrete and not contin- uous. Continuous models do not always map well onto real-world situations [9]. Interactions among economic agents in AB models are di- rect and inherently non-linear [36,37] . Agents interact di- rectly because current decisions directly depend, through adaptive expectations, on the past choices made by other agents in the population (i.e. a widespread presence of ex- ternalities). These may contain structures, such as sub- groups of agents or local networks. In such structures, members of the population are in some sense closer to certain individuals in the socio-economic space than oth- ers. These interaction structures may themselves endoge- nously change over time, since agents can strategically decide with whom to interact according to the expected payoffs. When combined with heterogeneity and bounded rationality, it is likely that aggregation processes are non- trivial and, sometimes, generate the emergence of struc- turally new objects [38, 39]. 9 Comprehensiveness:e It exhibits emergence [9, 12, 25]. Results generated by ABMs are more detailed than those generated by EBMs. ABMs can provide both individual and aggregate level de- tail at the same time. Since ABMs operate by modeling each individual and their decisions, it is possible to exam- ine the history and life of any one individual in the model, or aggregate individuals and observe the overall results. This bottom-up approach of ABMs is often in contrast with the top-down approach of many EBMs, which tell you only how the aggregate system is behaving and do not tell you anything about individuals. Many EBMs as- sume that one aspect of the model directly influences, or causes, another aspect of the model, while ABMs allow indirect causation via emergence to have a larger effect on the model outcomes [9]. One important feature of agent-based modeling, and of computational modeling in general, is that it is easy to in- corporate randomness into your models. Many equation- based models and other modeling forms require that each decision in the model be made deterministically. In agent- based models this is not the case; instead, the decisions can be made based on a probability [9, 20]. Randomness indeterminacy and With regard to Table 2, it makes sense that social structures such as teams, organizations, governments and nations or even galaxial systems are few examples of CASs each of which can exhibits a number of emergent properties. For instance, organizations are a type of CAS out of which phenomena such as cooperation, aggregation of core competencies or even the ways employees interactively reinforce or weaken organizational routines emerge [40]. In a wider economic system, macro-level phenomena such as inflation, stagflation, stock markets dynamics and economic inequality are aggregates (complex problems) emerging out of the economic systems. In recent years, the literature about complexity economics has been developed in so many areas including evolutionary models inspired by Nelson and Win- ter [41]and Hodgson [42], Brock and Durlaufs study of social interaction [43] , study of firm size by Axtell [44], Alan Kirman and his colleagues models of financial markets [34] and the agent-based simulation of general equilib- rium [45, 46].4 4For a comprehensive overview of computational methods in complexity economics, look at [32, 47] 10 However, regarding complex nature of real world, it goes clear that EBMs (such as constrained optimization models used in econometrics) cannot cap- ture the behavior of complex adaptive systems. This is an essential departure from the presumptions existing in conventional economic theories. Such sys- tems should be analyzed in time and this limits the way that mathematics can be used. Standard economic theory includes the applying of an ahistorical body of logical clauses to display attitudes perceived in the historical domain. In opposition, complex adaptive system theory copes directly with the fun- damental principles that rule the behavior of systems in history. Therefore, it can be said that thinking about the economy and its sub-components as complex adaptive systems can allow us to evade such scientific impasses .In economic thought, Schumpeters contributions toward the process of creative destruction conform to complex adaptive systems theory [48]. However, the core idea of Agent-Based Modeling is rooted in the fact that a CAS can be productively modeled with agents, an environment, and the rules of in- teractions among them. An agent is an autonomous entity with particular properties, behaviors, and even goals. The environment is a landscape over which agents have interactions and can be spatial, network-based, or mixture of them. The interactions can be non-linear and quite complex. Agents can have interaction with other agents or with the environment and they can not only change their interaction rules but also can change the strategies used to decide what behavior to do at a particular time [9]. So, ABMs can be con- sidered as a revolutionary methodology for modeling and simulating systems (i.e. real-world CASs) that are tremendously difficult and often impossible to be studied by EBMs [49]. 4 Main uses of ABMs ABMs can be used in description and explanation. Like all models, an AMB is a simplification of a real world system which doesnt entail all of its aspects so it is distinguishable from real world system and can help its understanding. The exploratory nature of ABM indicates that they can be used to pinpoint the essential mechanisms underlying the phenomena under study. a sub- ject matter expert can use an AMB as a proof that his or her hypothesized mechanisms sufficiently account for the aggregate behavior under study [9]. Explanation is strongly believed to be a major function of ABMs because it helps understand how simple rules generate complex structures. ABMs ex- planatory power is highly generative, especially in social sciences due to the fact that it explains which macro-structures such as epidemic dynamics or social evolutions emerge in population of heterogeneous agents that interact 11 locally and in non-trivial way under a set of tenable behavioral rules [50]. ABMs facilitate the experimentation process [51]. They can be run repeat- edly to discern variations in their dynamics and in their outputs [9]. Some models show a very little variations during several runs. Some have a path- dependency nature [52] and some exhibit tremendous variations from run to run. Through experimentation, system modelers get informed of how input parameters affect models outputs. Therefore, they can make various scenar- ios for achieving the targeted behavior. ABMs are sometimes used for prediction purposes. Subject matter experts frequently use models to get a picture about possible future states. Like every model the quality of ABMs prediction relies on the accuracy of its input parameters and since society is a complex system with an unspeci- fied degree of uncertainty and very high sensitivity to small-scale events, no prediction can be deemed as absolutely right [9, 24]. Prediction differs from description where the modeler describes the past or present states of the system, for example when a modeler describes what changes first occurred in the system. Moreover, prediction is also district from explanation, for example Plate tectonics definitely explains earthquakes, but does not help us to predict the time and place of their occurrence or evolution is commonly accepted as explaining speciation, but it is impossible to predict next year's flu strain [50].Nonetheless, when subject matter experts claim to have used ABMs for purpose of prediction, they actually use ABMs either for descrip- tion or explanation [9]. ABMs has a high functionality for education and analysis [53 -- 55]. Educa- tors can develop models for people that they have never seen before. For example, educators can model some examples of mutualism between individ- uals of different species when both individuals benefit5Moreover, models can simulate a system that may not be readily available from real-world obser- vations, therefor they can be very thought-provoking and enable learners to go beyond their observations and conduct experiments just like scientists. When a subject matter expert is going to gain a deeper understanding of a phenomena about which there is not enough theory, thought experiment can be very useful. Though experiment is another suitable area for ABMs. This type of experiment is done to achieve its purpose without benefit of execu- tion [57].Thought experiment is conducted when the real-world experiments 5An interesting example can be the mutualism between a goby and a shrimp. The shrimp digs a burrow in the sand and cleans it up where both species can live. Since the shrimp is almost blind, it has a high vulnerability to predators outside the burrow. When the shrimp is under dangerous conditions the goby goes over to warn the shrimp by touching it with its tail. This causes both the shrimp and goby quickly back into the burrow [56] 12 are neither affordable nor possible to execute [58]. It has a wide application in social and natural sciences. Through this method, researchers can get aware of the logical consequences of their hypotheses. For example, what will happen if a half of a companys staff suddenly leave it? ABMs can be very useful in thought experiments especially when people want to deal with complex systems such organization and society. Such systems are far from a real-word laboratory where it is possible to control some variable (as control group) and measure the effect of test on other variables (as treatment group). As a matter of fact, in such systems, there are numerous causal factors that are mainly interdependent over which we have on or a very limited con- trol [59]. So real-world experiments can rarely be executed in such systems. This has led researchers of social fields to utilize the potential of though ex- periment in simulating the consequences of their hypothesized mechanism. 5 ABM Building Blocks ABMs include three building blocks of (1) agents, (2) environment and (3) interactions [9, 17, 60]. As the first building block of ABMs, agents are the basic computational units of agent based models. They are defined by two main aspects of (1) properties and (2) behaviors (or actions). Agents prop- erties are internal or external states that can be changed by its behaviors (actions). Suppose you want to model an economic system including in- dividual human agents. Some properties for these agents can be status of employment, income level, number of bank account and age or even if neces- sary blood type! Actions of such agents can be searching for a job, opening a bank account, taking a loan and so on. As it is sensible, actions affect properties, for example, when a person opens a new bank account, the num- ber of his or her bank accounts increases. Or when a person finds a job, his or her status of employment is changed and subsequently his or her income level is positively influenced. As the first building block of any ABM, agents are in three specific types of mobile agents, stationary agents and connecting agents. Mobile agents have the capability of movement for example a human is a type of a mobile agent. Stationary agents are those static agents that have no moving capability. For example, an organization or in wider sense, an environment are types of stationary agents6. Connecting agents are those agents that connect agents together. One clear example of this can be links 6According to Netlogo programming language, an environment is built of several static agents called patch and all agents are on the environment. ABM programming languages and tools will be discussed in subsection 6.2 13 among agents (2). Additionally, in modeling agents, two major factors have to be taken into consideration, the first factor is about the granularity (grain- size) of agents. For example, when you want to model an economic system, you chose to model the individual actors or prefer to model institutions. The second important factor deals with the cognitive level of agents. In fact, how much is the capability of agents to observe (and sense) the surrounding world and make decisions? According to cognitive level of agents, they can be classified into four types of (1) reflective or myopic agents, (2) utility-based agents, (3) goal-based agents, (4) adaptive agents [9]. The reflective agents are very simple if-then agents so that if they face situation A, they immediately do action B. Utility- based agents are very similar to reflective ones but there is a utility function that they do want to maximize it under all conditions. Goal-based agents are more advanced form of utility-based function so that they have a goal that dictates their actions. The most advanced form of agents are adaptive agents. They have enough cognitive capabilities to change their actions in similar conditions based on prior experience. Namely, if they do action A in situation B and lose some payoffs, when they face situation B again, they dont do action A according to their prior experiences.7 As the second building blocks of ABMs, the environment is composed of all conditions surrounding the agents as they interact within the model. In other words, the environment is where an artificial social life unfolds [60]. Environ- ments can come into three different major forms of (1) spatial environment, (2) networked environment and (3) mixed environment. The spatial environ- ment is often a discrete environment including several discrete points8 . The most common form of spatial environment is lattice structure which can be two or three dimensional (as Figure 2). In spatial environments, when agent A (here the purple agent) reaches a border on the far right side of the envi- ronment (i.e., the world) and wants to go farther right, boundary conditions of the environment come to play. The topology of an environment deals with such boundary conditions. For a spatial lattice structure such as Figure 2, there can be three types of topologies. The first type is a toroidal topology where agent A reappears in the far left side of the lattice. The second type is bounded topology where agent A cannot move farther right and finally, the third type is infinite plane topology where agent A can keep going right for ever [9]. In real world situations, such as socio-economic settings, agents have more networked interactions than spatial (geographical) interactions. In two different stock markets, a rumor spreads through the individual agents 7For a more comprehensive study of agent cognition, look at [61] 8It can also be continuous, see [9] 14 Figure 2: Building Blocks of ABM of a network. Therefor an environment can be in a network form where the mobile agents are nodes and the connections among them are links. There are several types of networks that three of them are widely used which are random networks [62], watts-strogatz small-world [63] and scale-free net- works [64].9 All these networks have been visualized in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 respectively. Using network structures as an ABM environment provides lots of oppor- tunities to synthesize social network theory (SNT) with ABM. As a matter of fact, ABMs are developed to explain how simple rules generate complex emergence (i.e. a process model) and in terms of network science ABMs are used to analyze the pattern that arise from agents interactions over the time (i.e. a pattern model) [9]. When spatial environment and networked environment come together, they form a mixed environment as visualized in Figure2. As the third building block of ABMs, interactions refer to rules of behaviors for both agents and the environment [60]. Actually, these rules enable agents to interact with both themselves and others. There are five basic classes of interactions: agent-self, environment-self, agent-agent, environment-agent, and environment-environment. In agent-self interactions, an agent checks its internal states and decides according to them. Environment-self inter- actions are when areas of the environment alter or change themselves. For instance, they can change their internal state variables as a result of some calculations. Agent-agent Interactions are usually the most important type of action within ABMs. Agent-Environment Interactions happen when the agent manipulates or examines an area of the world in which it exists, or when the environment in some way observes or alter the agents internal states. Environment-Environment Interactions between different areas of the environment are probably the least commonly used interaction type in ABMs [9]. 9For a more comprehensive study of networks, look at [65, 66] 15 Figure 3: A random network 6 Development of ABMs Generally, an ABM can be developed through three sequential and often it- erative phases10:(1) designing phase, (2) programming phase and finally, (3) examination and analysis phase [9]. In designing phase, the initial skeleton of ABMs is constructed. This initial skeleton is actually the textual model of ABM through which all behavioral rules and properties of agents and environment along with the way they interact with each other are verbally documented. As the second phase, programming phase deals with how to translate the ABMs textual model to a computational model by agent based programming languages and toolkits. The examination and analysis as the third phase are conducted for getting insights concerning (1) model verifi- cation, (2) model validation, (3) model replication and reproducibility and (4) models output analysis. In the following, these three phases would be discussed. 10There is not still a completely agreed-upon and standard protocol for ABM develop- ment among all practitioners [31]. One good protocol for ABM development is in [67] 16 Figure 4: Small-world network Figure 5: Scale-free preferential attachment network 17 6.1 Designing Phase Through designing phase, all behavioral rules and properties of agents and environment along with the way they interact with each other are docu- mented by natural language of subject matter experts (SMEs) in this phase. This documentation actually serves as a textual model.118 basic stages have to be well addressed as detailed in Table3: Table 3: Stages of ABM development Stage Underlying 1- questions of model Description What questions does the model want to answer? Which aspects of the real system under study are going to be described in the model? What types of agents are going to be created in the model? 2- Types of agents and granularity 3- Granularity of agents 4- Properties agents 5- Behavioral rules What are the behavioral rules of agents? How different What is the granularity of the agents? Are agents coarse- grained or fine-grained or both of them? What properties do agents hold? of Environment Input parame- 6- structure 7- ters 8- Outputs measures 9- scheduling and are these behavioral rules? What are the external forces affecting agents? Is environ- ment spatial or networked or both of them? What are input variables to model? What is the type of input variables? (Boolean, string, continuous,..) What measures and outputs are going to be collected from the model? What is the sequence and time-step of models events? While designing an ABM, three main factors associated with ABMs mod- eling approaches should be taken into consideration. Actually, In ABM literature, modeling approaches can be divided based on a number of as- pects. Three of the most important aspects include 1-goal of modeling, 2-development method and 3-elaboration strategy. In terms of modeling goal, ABMs can be grouped into two major categories of phenomena-based modelling and exploratory modelling [9]. In phenomena-based modeling researchers begin with a known target phenomenon. Typically, that phe- nomenon has a characteristic pattern, known as a reference pattern. Exam- 11A textual model is the conceptual model of an ABM which is documented in natural language. 18 ples of reference patterns might be common housing segregation patterns in cities, diffusion of a specific ICT technology, spiral-shaped galaxies in space or oscillating population levels in interacting species [9]. These reference patterns are those statistical regularities that econometricians suppose as stylized facts for example, the way price affects supply or demand. The goal of phenomena-based modeling is to create a model that will somehow capture the reference pattern. In ABM, this translates to finding a set of agents, and rules for those agents that will generate the known reference pattern. Once you have generated the reference pattern you have a candidate explanatory mechanism for that pattern and may also vary the model parameters to see if other patterns emerge, and perhaps try to find those patterns in data sets or by conducting experiments. Phenomena-based modeling can also be used with other forms of modeling, such as equation-based modeling. In equation- based modeling, this would mean writing down equations that will give rise to the reference pattern. Evidently all empirical validations perform well in case of phenomena-based modelling where there is a reference pattern against which the accuracy of models results is measured. The second core modeling form is exploratory modeling. This form is per- haps less common in equational contexts than it is in ABM literature. In exploratory modeling with ABM, a researcher can create a set of agents, define their behavior, and explore the patterns that emerge. One might ex- plore them solely as abstract forms, much like cellular automata developed by Conway [68] but to count as a modeling practice, we must note similarities between the behavior of our model and some phenomena in the world just as patterns generated by cellular automata like oscillators and spaceships [69]. Then our ABM should be refined in the direction of perceived similarities with these phenomena and converge toward an explanatory model of some phenomenon. Phenomena-based modelling stems from the notion that there is an objective and real but unobservable data generating mechanism and that the purpose of any model is to represent elements of that mechanism in ways that generate some of the same data. But, in the case of exploratory based modeling the purpose of the models is the representation of perceptions of policy analysts and other stakeholders in the relevant social processes [24]. The phenomenon based modeling is a class of agent based models that has much in common with mainstream economic models. They incorporate utility functions; they employ numerical representations of phenomena and attributes naturally de- scribed in qualitative terms by the individuals being represented and by other stakeholders. The exploratory modeling is a class of models emerging from a process that is embedded in the social process of policy and strategy for- mation. Such models are typically described in linguistic terms (i.e. mental 19 models) used by stakeholders rather than numerical variables intelligible and meaningful only to modelers. Such models are developed to facilitate stake- holder participation in the model design and validation process. They are intended precisely to represent the perceptions of stakeholders in order to bring clarity to scenarios built to explore the possibilities - the opportuni- ties and threats - of an uncertain future. The major function of exploratory modeling is to enable the subject matter experts (SMEs) to see what out- comes their mental model(s) can produce when implemented in a real-world system. Therefore, they can have lots of advantages for those who deal with understanding complex systems. In terms of elaboration strategy, ABMs can be grouped into KISS, KIDS and TAPAS strategies. KISS strategy that stands for Keep It Simple, Stupid. This notion is rooted in the Occams razor principle stating while being faced with a number of competing hypotheses for a problem, one should select a hypothesis that has a fewer assumption This principle advocates the law of parsimony and agent-based modelers that use this principle start from simple models and gradually sophisticate it to answer their question. KIDS strat- egy which stands for Keep It Descriptive, Simple is in opposite direction of KISS strategy. Advocates of KIDS strategy start from descriptive models and gradually simplify them to answer their questions [31, 70].12 TAPAS strategy that stands for (Take A Previous model and Add Something). In this strategy, modelers take an existing model and successively modify it through adding new features or relating initial assumption [72]. In terms of development, ABMs can be grouped into two major categories of theory-based modelling and evidence-based modelling [24]. ABMs can be developed via a theory. Actually a theory that specifies the behavioral rules of agents or the statistical regularities that the model is designed to explain them. Since theory-based ABMs are built upon prior empirical studies and aimed at stimulating real-world aggregates such as technology diffusion, dis- ease spread and inflation formation, they are basically used for phenomena- based modeling where the modelling of a real-world pattern is the purpose of the modeler. Besides theories, ABMS can also be developed based on evi- dence. The evidence-based modeling is used when researchers have a mental model concerning behavioral rules of agents of a system and they are in- terested in understanding the collective behavior of that system when its agents interact with each other. As it can be inferred, this approach is the 12Technically, KISS and KIDS can be supposed as two opposite ends of spectrum. In an effort for developing a unified strategy, Rand and Wilensky (2007) developed full spectrum modeling strategy. In this strategy models are developed in a progressive way ( either from simple to descriptive or descriptive to simple) and the phenomenon under study is modelled at multiple levels of details [71] 20 foundation of exploratory modeling approach where a model is developed for representing the emergent properties of researchers mental models. Evidence-based ABMs can be developed either as participatory modeling or individual thought experiments. One of major forms of participatory mod- eling is "companion modeling"(ComMod) which is an iterative participatory approach where multidisciplinary researchers and stakeholders work together continuously throughout a three-stage cycle field work − > modelling − > simulation − > field work again [73]. ComMod follows two basic objectives. First, it increases the understanding of complex systems through its three-stage cycle. Second, it supports collective decision-making Processes in Complex Situations. In this case, the approach facilitates collective these kinds of processes by making more explicit the var- ious points of view and subjective criteria, to which the different stakeholders refer implicitly or even unconsciously. Indeed, as demonstrated in past re- search [74]when facing a complex situation, the decision-making process is evolving, iterative, and continuous. It means that this process produces al- ways imperfect "decision acts", but following each iteration they are less imperfect and more shared. Principally, the main principle of the ComMod approach is to develop simulation models integrating various stakeholders points of view and to use them within the context of platforms for collec- tive learning. This is a modeling approach in which stakeholders participate fully in the construction of models to improve their relevance and increase their use for the collective assessment of scenarios. The general objective of ComMod is to facilitate dialogue, shared learning, and collective decision- making through interdisciplinary and implicated action-oriented research to strengthen the adaptive management capacity of local communities [73]. As a software engineering method Virtual Overlay Multi Agent System (VO- MAS) has been used to improve ComMod methodology [75].VOMAS is used for facilitating last two stages of ComMod, namely modeling and simulation. This method has been very successful in building verified and validated agent based models [76].In a nutshell, the textual model (i.e. the conceptual model) of an ABM is the output of designing phase. 6.2 Programming Phase When the textual model of an ABM is designed, it should be simulated through an agent based programming languages or simulation toolkits.13 13Sometime an ABM can be directly developed in the programming phase through participatory simulation platforms. This type of simulation is useful for simulating sys- tems that there is not enough data about them therefore designing an initial conceptual model for them is almost impossible. According to this approach, an agent-based model 21 Such simulation toolkits are a type of simulation software specifically for translating the textual model of an ABM into a computational model. A simulation is an understandable manifestation of a model, coded and visu- alized by a computer program which provides insights regarding the system under study. A simulation model basically refers to the computing algo- rithms or mathematical expression that entail the performance and total behavior of a system in the real world scenarios [79]. In the early 1990s, general purpose programming languages (GPPLs) were basically used for simulation. SMALLTALK, C++ and Java were the most common GPPLs in ABM community of practice. Using GPPLs for agent based simulation have some visible disadvantages. For example, modelers have to implement basic functions and plotting from scratch and they should be very familiar with the programming language [80]. Such problems have resulted in development of agent-based simulation toolkits which help modelers a lot to simulate the complex system under study. As presented in Table4, the majority of toolkits support the primary GPPLs including Java, C++, C and Logo variant. Table 4: Toolkit and their programming languages adapted from [81] Toolkit Programming Language Java C++ C Logo * * * * * * * * * * ADK AgentBuilder AnyLogic Ascape DeX Echo iGen LSD MadKit MAML Mason Netlogo RepastS Starlogo StarlogoT Swarm * * * * * * * * * * * * is directly developed through direct participation of stakeholders of the problems in dis- tributed platforms such as client-server network. This simulation is very useful in research and education [77, 78]. 22 As it can be seen in above table, some of platforms are supported by mul- tiple languages such as AgentBuilder, iGen and Madkits that are supported by Java, C++ and C. During this paper, Nelogo 6.0.1 has been used to simu- late all ABMs. As one of the most frequently used agent based modeling and simulation toolkit, Netlogo was developed by Uri Wilensky in 1999. Since its development, it has been regularly updated in sequence of versions and a number of extensions.14 When model designers and model programmers are different persons, before offering their conceptual models to programmers, model authors had better put it in a unified modeling language (UML) for- mat. Because, it helps programmers a lot to accurately discern what model authors want [82]. 6.3 Examination Phase When ABMs are designed and programmed, they should be examined. Ex- amination phase is highly critical for showing (1) is ABM right designed? (2) Is a right ABM designed? (3) Is ABM replicable by other researchers? And (4) how should outputs be analyzed? Each of these questions will be addressed in the following: 6.3.1 Verification In verification process the main purpose is to determine whether the designed model corresponds to programmed model. As it is sensible, through verifica- tion process the researchers try to understand the gap between the designed model and its implementation (computational model) and fill it through cor- rection and code debugging. As a matter of facts, verification process comes to play when the model author (i.e., subject matter expert or designer) and model implementer (i.e., simulation specialist or programmer) are different persons which is very common among academic researchers cooperating in a team [9,17,75,76,83]. In such a situation, the model author should iteratively discuss the model with the model programmer so that the model programmer understands and programs what exactly the model author wants. This pro- cess is called iterative modelling [9]which can help model verification process when model author and model programmer are different persons (See the backward curve with the red arrow in Figure6). One very noteworthy point for facilitating the verification process is that the SMEs frequently check tex- tual model developed in designing phase and find its inconsistencies with the computational model developed in programming. 14Readers can refer to Netlogo home page ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ in order to get more information of this agent based modeling toolkit. 23 Table 5: Validation Axes Macro Macro face Validation Macro empirical Validation Axis 2 Micro Micro face Validation Micro empirical Validation Face Axis 1 Eimpirical 6.3.2 Validation Validation of computational models has always been a major concern for Simulation specialists [31, 83 -- 85]. Validation is defined as when the simu- lated model produces the results that are in a satisfactory range of accuracy matching up with the real-world data [31]. Model validation is the process of determining whether the implemented model corresponds to, and explains some phenomenon in the real world [9]. When a model is implemented, its validation becomes so essential. A valid model assures the researchers of the models rightness [86]. Therefore, the models results are supposed to be useful out of the model and can be confidently used for policy making. A number of studies have been conducted about types of validation [31, 86], levels through which validation can be done [9,83]and various methodologies for conducting validation [24, 31, 76]. In a big picture, all validation meth- ods can be classified as qualitative and quantitative methods. qualitative methods like face validity are very subjective and expert-based while quanti- tative ones such as empirical validation approaches are objective and based on real-world data [86] (Pullum, Laura L; Cui, 2012). Face validation is the process of showing that the mechanisms and properties of the model look like mechanisms and properties of the real world. It is mainly conducted by sub- ject matter experts (SMEs). Empirical validation makes sure that the model generates data that can be demonstrated to correspond to similar patterns of data in the real world. Validation approaches of ABMs essentially depend on modelling approaches [24]. When ABMs are used to simulate a real-life statistical regularity as is the case of phenomena-based modeling, empirical validation approaches are used. But when ABMs are used to simulate the mental models of systems stakeholders and show what will emerge from them as is the case of exploratory modeling, qualitative validation methods such as face validity are used. Since ABMs have different micro-macro behavior lev- els (e.g., an agents individual behavior vs models behavioral aggregate),they should be validated according to two axes [83]as shown in Table5. In the macro face validation, the SMEs want to know how much the aggre- 24 gated patterns produced by the implemented model correspond on face to the real-world aggregated patterns? In the micro-face validation, the SMEs plan to discern how much properties and behavior rules of agents correspond on face to reality? In the macro-empirical validation, the SMEs want to know how much the outputs or targeted aggregates produced by the implemented model correspond to real-word data? In the micro-empirical validation, the SMEs want to discern how much input parameters, properties and behavior rules of agents correspond to real-word data? In all empirical validations, most often the model should be calibrated both at micro and macro levels. The calibration is a process through which the suitable parameters and ini- tial conditions are found so that the implemented model generates a pattern similar to real-world pattern [9, 31, 83, 84]. 6.3.3 Replication If a model is going to be acceptable among a scientific community, it must be replicable. Replication of a model is actually the re-implementation of its conceptual model according to the previous results produced by its imple- mented model. When a computational model is replicated, it not only shows its verification is trustable but also reexamines its reevaluation and facilitates a common language among modelers [9]. One effective way for facilitating the replication of a model is publication of its programming codes by its authors in open access platforms such as http://modelingcommons.org/account/login for Netlogo programmers and https://www.comses.net/ for all programmers. Another effective way is a full publication of (1) hardware specifications of a computer used for simulation and (2) the programming language and toolk- its used for simulation. However, one very noticeable point is the fact that when a model is successfully replicated it should be able to produce outputs A successful replication is one in which the replicators are able to establish that the replicated model creates outputs sufficiently similar to the outputs of the original. This does not necessarily mean that the two models have to generate the exact same results [9].15 6.3.4 Output Analysis ABMs generate a great deal of data both at micro-level and macro-level. Because of such a data comprehensiveness, a number of analyses can be con- ducted on such models. As the eighth stage of table 3, the output analysis is related to measures that the SMEs want to analyze the effect of model input parameters on them. One very noteworthy point in analysis of ABMs 15For a more comprehensive study of ABMs replication , look at [87]. 25 Figure 6: ABM Development Process outputs is the stochastisity of such computational models. Actually, like CASs, ABMs have stochastic nature. Even with the same set of parameters (parameter combinations), They produce different results in different runs. This requires researchers to do such simulations in multiple runs and analyze statistical distributions of targeted results (behavior under study) through inferential statistics methods [9, 88]. To have a good analysis, in addition to descriptive statistics measures, the researchers can use inferential statistics methods such as various statistical tests in analyzing the statistical distribu- tion of ABMs outputs. Moreover, if a network environment is used, several number of social network theory (SNT) measures can be very useful for ex- tracting specific insights from ABMs outputs. In the nutshell, the big picture of ABM development process is visualized in Figure6. 7 Two Critical Considerations Complex adaptive systems (CASs) are real world systems which have a num- ber of characteristics (As discussed in Table1. In contrast, Agent based mod- els (ABMs) are a type of computational methodology believed to be very promising in modeling CASs. Every developed ABM only shows one or some aspects of a CAS not all of its aspects. Therefore, what ABM practitioners 26 Figure 7: A real CAS and a simulated CAS produce via simulating a CAS (e.g., a society) is a simplified and artificial picture of that CAS as it is visualized in Figure7. Two significant factors that have to be taken in to consideration by every ABM practitioner would be discussed in the following. 7.1 Emergence CASs exhibit emergent properties. A property of a CAS that emerges out of non-linear (non-trivial) interactions among its constituent components so that it is beyond and irreducible to them is called emergence. In compari- son to other simulation techniques such as discrete event simulation (DES), system dynamics (SD) or even game theory, one of the greatest advantages of ABM is its outstanding prowess in showing the emergent properties of CASs. Our world exhibits several observable CASs, in biological sciences, molecules emerge out of interacting atoms, organelles emerge out of inter- acting molecules, cells emerge out of interacting organelles. Organs emerge of interacting cells and finally body emerges out of interacting organs. Such examples of emergent properties of our body indicates that it is a biological CAS full of interesting emergent properties. In a sociological perspective, there are also several examples of CAS, as an instance, the society can be interpreted as an emergent property of interacting humans or even norms can be studied as emergent property of social system. The emergence is very difficult to forecast and completely depends on the observation [89]. In fac- ing the challenge of emergence, there can be two kinds of human thinking way [9]. As shown in 8a, integrative thinking refers to when the SMEs have a 27 (a) Integrative Thinking (b) differential Thinking Figure 8: Two different kinds of Thinking CAS in mind (e.g., an organization into which a number of people with different religious backgrounds and specialties work) but they dont know its targeted emergent property (e.g., the pattern of cooperation or formation of hierarchy). In contrast, when SMEs have an observable emergent property but dont know its CAS (i.e., from which CAS, that property emerged) they are facing differential thinking as visualized in 8b. Essentially, integrative thinking comes to play when the exploratory modeling is assumed while differential thinking takes effect when the phenomena-based modeling is adopted. However, whereas the core of integrative thinking is to discern what properties will emerge out of the CAS under study, differential thinking is used to grasp what CASs can lead to the emergent property under study. 7.2 Non-Ergodicity of ABMs and the necessity of sen- sitivity analysis Like CASs, ABMs are non-ergodic. Non-ergodic systems are highly sensi- tive to initial conditions. If their initial conditions are a little changed, their output behaviors will be drastically influenced. So, it is necessary to do sensitivity analysis in ABMs after they are programmed and evaluate how their final behaviors (measures) are sensitive to change of their input param- eters [9, 30]. A good sensitivity analysis can help SMEs (1) to get aware of 28 how emergent properties are produced in ABMs, (2) to get able to examine the robustness of emergent properties and (3) to get able to quantify the changeability of ABMs outputs after input parameters are changed. A num- ber of methods have been proposed for sensitivity analysis of ABMs, three important if which are (1) one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT), model-free output decomposition of variance and (3) variance decomposition of model based output [90]. 8 Two Simulations To illustrate the implementation of ABM, two economic systems have been simulated using an exploratory agent-based modeling approach [91]. Ex- ploratory ABM has a wide potentiality for thought experiment [58]. As dis- cussed above, this approach is grounded on evidence based modelling where a SME (or a team of them) likes to make sense of what will possibly emerge out of their mental models before being executed in real world. Outcomes produced by an exploratory ABM can find a number of empirical supports in real world data. Therefore, it can also play a vital role in theory develop- ment [8].Through this implementation, an exploratory ABM has been used to show (1) how economic inequality emerges within an economic system (2) how charity and allocation strategies of charity entities can help reduce this emergent economic inequality. The firs system (system I) is mainly inspired by the work of Wilensky and Rand (2015). However, to make this model more suitable for this study, some new features have been added to its original version including (1) the possibility of changing the number of agents in the interface view, (2) the possibility of choosing money amount for agents in the interface view, (3) the possibility of simulation when agents start with equal or unequal amount of money in initial condition (see 9a for equal amount and see 9b for unequal amount) and (4) the possibility of showing the amount of money of each agent by its color in the world view so that the richer agents get a darker color and go north wise while the poorer agents get a lighter color and go south wise (Figure 9b). The second system (system II) is an extension of system I which includes a number of new features such as (1) the ability of human agents to give char- ity, (2) the establishment of charity agents, (3) the strategies that charity agents (entities) can take to allocate the charity among the needy agents and so on . In order to make the replication of this model easier, the agent-based simulation of system II can be directly searched and down- loaded from http//modelingcommons.org/browse/one_model/5379#model_tabs_browse_info that 29 is a useful platform for communicating and discussing agent-based models written in Netlogo 6.0.1. The conceptual models (textual models) of system I and system II along with their simulation and analysis would be discussed in the following: 8.1 System I This system is built upon five assumptions including (1) there is a society in which N number of persons live, (2) there is a global clock that shows the time by each tick and it is completely discrete, (3) each person has M amount of money that can be equal or unequal in the initial conditions, (4) there is a money gap between the five low deciles (bottom 50% and the tenth decile (top 10%). It can be positive, zero or negative. When it is positive, it shows the money of five low deciles is more than that of tenth decile. In case of being zero, it shows the money of five low deciles is equal to that of tenth decile and if it is negative, it indicates the money of five low deciles is less than that of tenth decile, (5) there is a critical threshold which shows the criticality of economic situation when the value of money gap becomes lower than it. According to this system, if all people (N = 500) of the society have an equal amount of money (M =100) in the initial conditions and donate a unit of money to each other randomly and by each time tick as long as each persons money is more than zero, what would be the answers to following questions: 1- How will the probability distribution of money be in tick of 100? 2- How will the probability distribution of money be in tick of 1000? 3- How will the probability distribution of money be in tick of 9000? Because of the stochastic nature of agent-based models, the probability distribution of money in system I has been simulated in 10 different runs . In run 1, According to 10a, After 100 ticks, the probability distribution of money is similar to a normal distribution as M N (100, 110.612). This distribution shows that money of each person is very inclined to the average money of society. Therefore, all deciles of society have a somewhat similar amount of money. In addition, as shown in 11a,there is a great distance between the money volume of all five lower deciles (bottom 50% with 22885 units of money) and that of tenth decile (top 10% with 5933 units of money) meaning that bottom 50% has 16952 units of money more than top 10%. As demonstrated in r10b, the probability distribution of money has become flatter when the system I is in tick of 1000. This normal distribution has a mean of 100 and variance of 972.661 implying that the majority of the society have a money inclined to 100 units of money and just a few of them own a very high amount of money. However, regarding 11b it can be concluded, the total amount of money of bottom 50% has become mitigated to 18835 30 (a) A 3D view of 100 agents with equal amount of money in the initial conditions (b) A 3D view of 100 agents with unequal amount of money in the initial conditions Figure 9: Agents with equal and unequal amount of money in the initial conditions 31 (a) Probability distribution of money in tick 100 (b) Probability distribution of money in tick 1000 (c) Probability distribution of money in tick 9000 Figure 10: Distribution of money in different ticks (100,1000,9000) 32 while the top 10% has accumulated a remarkable amount of money 7783 and money distance has decreased by a large degree to 11052. According to 10c, when system I comes to tick of 9000, it shows a Boltzman-Gibbs distribution implying that just a very few of persons have accumulated a great amount of money and a large number of them have just gained a little amount of money. In this case the bottom 50% has an amount of money of 9134 while top 10% has an amount equal to 13052 that is 3918 units more than that of bottom 50%. The money volume of top 10% has exceeded that of bottom 50% in tick of 5800 since then the gap has increased (see 11c). Statistical summary of all 10 runs for ticks of 100, 1000 and 9000 is described in Table6, Table7 and Table8 respectively. Table 6: System up to tick of 100 # runs of Mean Variance Total money of top 10% RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 110.621 104.561 102.997 92.641 100.917 97.002 89.254 90.509 100.044 106.052 5933 5877 5908 5824 5867 5850 5840 5884 5913 5963 Total money of bot- tom 50% 22885 22959 22988 23114 22974 23025 23132 23149 23028 22987 diff Tick of critical stage 16952 17082 17080 17290 17107 17175 17292 17265 17115 17024 - - - - - - - - - - Table 7: System up to tick of 1000 # runs of Mean Variance Total money of top 10% RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 100 100 100 7783 972.661 950.793 7578 1031.490 7926 33 Total money of bot- tom 50% 18835 18871 18555 diff Tick of critical stage 11052 11293 10629 - - - RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1092.669 7763 1054.322 7837 986.492 7645 1001.531 7975 1259.535 8191 958.436 7712 1063.314 7840 18279 18425 18778 18765 17949 18822 e18480 10516 10588 11133 10790 9758 11110 0640 - - - - - - - Table 8: System up to tick of 9000 of Mean Variance Total # runs money of top 10% 6256.793 13052 5359.631212692 5042.136 12207 4959.899 11890 5443.066 12562 4869.382 11871 5597.174 12459 5326.837 12560 5533.523 12648 5469.022 12428 Total money of bot- tom 50% 9134 10807 10878 10662 10225 10737 9723 10373 10046 10011 diff -3918 -1885 -1329 -1228 -2337 -1134 -2736 -2187 -2602 -2417 Tick of critical stage 5800 6476 6310 6919 5801 6941 5520 5752 2725 5668 RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 As a fundamental law of equilibrium statistical mechanics, Boltzman- Gibbs law states that any conserved quantity in a big system should follow an exponential probability distribution. According to Boltzman-Gibbs law, in a closed economic system, the total amount of money is conserved because it is not manufactured, consumed or destroyed. p(m) = Ce −m t (1) Here m stands for money, C is a normalizing constant and T is an effective temperature equal to the average amount of money per agent. Some studies have shown that the money distribution follows a Boltzman-Gibbs law when it is conserved and exchanged in a closed system. According to this property 34 (a) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 100 (b) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 1000 (c) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 9000 Figure 11: Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in different ticks (100,1000,9000) 35 of money distribution a very few of persons will accumulate a great amount of money while a large number of them just gain a little amount of money [92 -- 94]. As it can be seen in table 3, in all ten runs, the top 10% has outweighed the bottom 50% in terms of accumulated money and consequently economic situation entered a critical stage in all runs. Thus, in order to prevent this economic system from becoming more critical, system I has been extended into system II by adding some more mechanisms to it. 8.2 System II M number of charity organizations are added to system I. These organizations come to scene when the economic situation becomes critical (i.e., the money of 10% of the society becomes equal to or more than that of its 50%). The mission of these organizations is to help the low five deciles not to deteriorate more in the depth of poverty. These beneficiaries work based on the charity amount that benefactors give to them in order to distribute it among five lower deciles. In terms of charity -giving and distribution, these charities can take one of three allocation strategies of A, B or C. Strategy A is applied when just the richest person of the society gives a unit of his or her money to the charity organization and it allocates that money to the poorest person of the society. When c% of members of decile 10 give a unit of money to the charity organization and it allocates that of amount of money among d% of members of five lower deciles, the charity organization has used strategy B. The charity entities use strategy C when k% of members of decile 10, p% of members of decile 9 and v% of members of decile 8 give money (everybody one unit of money) to them and they distribute that amount of money among x% of members of decile 1, y% of members of decile 2 and z% of members of decile 3 respectively. This model can help answering the following questions: 1- How will strategy A affect the economic system when it enters a critical stage? 2- How will strategy B affect the economic system when it enters a critical stage? 3- How will strategy C affect the economic system when it enters a critical stage? According to table 3, for run 1, the system has entered the critical stage in tick of 5800. The charity organization has used strategy A to help system exit this stage but it has not got out of the critical stage in the next ticks (up to 9000). It means that as long as the charity entity uses strategy A to help system get out of the critical stages, it fails to exit and returns to critical stage by each tick. The return period or recurrence interval of the critical stage is a key indicator for measuring the sustainability of allocation strategies. The visualization of how charity organization uses strategy A in tick of 5800 is shown in Figure12. 36 Figure 12: A 3D view of distribution of charity by charity entity while using strategy A in tick 5800 According to Figure12, the red line indicates charity from the richest person of the society (benefactor) to charity and the green line indicates the charity distributed by charity to the poorest person of the society. As it can be no- ticed, the spatial position and color of rich persons are different from those of the poorer ones. Such differences are because of a mechanism embedded into this model which forces the rich get darker color and move north wise while making the poor get brighter and move south wise. As shown in figures 20 to 25, for run 1, strategy A, strategy B (with parameters of c=100 and d= 20) and Strategy C (with parameters of k = 100, p = 60, v= 40, x= 100, y=60 and z= 40) have been applied for handling the economic critical stages up to 9000 ticks. As demonstrated in 13a,13b and 13c, by each of allocation strategies, charity organization have tried to help the economic system exit the critical stage while entering it in every time. In this case when the total money of top 10% becomes equal to or exceeds that of bot- tom 50%, the total money of top 10% will be forced back to a value less than that of bottom 50% depending on how many of three higher deciles participate in giving charity and also which allocation strategies the charity organizations use to distribute the charity among poorer deciles. According to the Boltzman-Gibbs law after one of allocation strategies is implemented the money (as a conserved quantity here) will tend to become accumulated into hands of a very few of people. Thus the systems enter the critical stage again. The number of times that economic system returns to the critical stage after a typical strategy is used for resource redistribution in it, is a 37 (a) Distribution of charity by charity entity while using strategy A for 9000 ticks (b) Distribution of charity by charity entity while using strategy B for 9000 ticks (c) Distribution of charity by charity entity while using strategy C for 9000 ticks Figure 13: Influence of different strategies(A,B,C) in charity distribution 38 key factor for measuring how sustainable that strategy is. As it can be seen from 14a,14b,14c, when a typical strategy is used, the society will have a specific form of money distribution in the final tick (here 9000). Therefore, the less variance the distribution has, the better resource allocation strategy has been used. Because it has more reduced the economic inequality among people (in terms of money distribution). Thus, the variance of money dis- tribution in the society when it enters the final tick is another key factor for measuring the efficiency of the resource allocation strategy. The number of return periods of critical stages and variance of the money distribution in all runs have been presented for all of strategies in Table9, Table10 and Table11. Table 9: Application of strategy A up to 9000 ticks # of runs Mean Variance Total RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 2015 1517 2287 1386 2150 1656 2638 1590 2368 2059 11328 10792 11121 10815 11001 11208 10745 11383 10725 10997 money of top 10% 11219 10888 10784 10650 0838 11314 10716 11298 10364 10727 diff -109 96 Total money of bottom 50% 4465.974 4398.300 4596.4128 -337 4516.769 -165 -163 4489.615 106 4341.547 4479.010 -29 -85 4419.070 -361 4624.541 4459.478 -270 Table 10: Application of strategy B up to 9000 ticks # of runs Mean Variance Total RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 42 47 48 18 34 26 money of top 10% 11032 11353 11475 11357 11256 11594 11182 11459 11592 11474 11316 11673 39 Total money of bottom 50% 4399.110 4415.555 4443.134 4364.448 4367.595 4378.737 diff 150 106 117 117 60 79 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 37 37 39 22 11243 11213 11351 11252 11351 11272 11420 11292 4377.206 4426.685 4435.002 4379.559 108 59 69 40 Table 11: Application of strategy C up to 9000 ticks # of runs Mean Variance Total RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 RUN 4 RUN 5 RUN 6 RUN 7 RUN 8 RUN 9 RUN 10 31 19 28 14 30 22 24 27 26 27 11224 11681 11464 11305 11371 11667 11525 11579 11286 11635 money of top 10% 11520.3 11760 11544.3 11565.3 11519.7 11850 12082.7 11699 11379.7 11707.7 Total money of bottom 50% 4302.669 4388.751 4409.166 4252.689 4315.761 4394.670 4166.427 4363.750 4326.632 4311.794 diff 296.33 79 80.33 260.33 148.66 182.99 562.666 119.99 93.66 72.66 According to Table9, Table10 and Table11, when strategy A is used, the average number of return periods is 1966.6 (roughly 1967) times Meaning that in all 10 runs, the economic system has returned to critical stage with the average of 1967 times. By applying strategy B, the system has shown a remarkably small average number of return periods which is 35. This number shows the second strategy is far more sustainable than strategy A in helping the system exit the critical stage for long time intervals. Strategy C has shown the number of 24.8 (roughly 25) for average of return periods in all runs.The number of return periods for each strategy has been visualized in Figure15: The sustainability of strategies. The vertical axis of this figure is the number of return periods that is made logarithmic (for better represen- tation) and the horizontal axis stands for number of runs of simulation. As it can be seen, the strategy A has had the lowest level of sustainability while the strategy C has the highest one. Except run 10, strategy C has shown the lowest number of return periods for all other runs. Though this number 40 (a) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 9000 when the charity entity uses strategy A (b) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 9000 when the charity entity uses strategy B (c) Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% in tick 9000 when the charity entity uses strategy C Figure 14: Distance of bottom 50% from top 10% after executing each strat- egy (A,B,C) 41 Figure 15: The sustainability of strategies doesnt significantly differ from that of strategy B, it shows more sustainabil- ity. Another information that has be inferred from Table9, Table10 and Table11, refers to how efficient each of allocation strategies has been in reducing the overall variance among people in terms of money distribution. This indicator shows how much agents differ from each other in terms of money volume. When strategy A is applied, the average overall variance of money distribu- tion is 4624.5 meaning that in all 10 runs of simulation, the average overall variance of distribution of money in economic system has been 4479.07. By executing strategy B, the average overall variance has decreased to 4398.70. While the charity paid in strategy B is 50 times more than that of strategy A (when systems enter critical stage), the average overall variance has not decreased remarkably (only 80.37 units). Strategy C has shown a better per- formance in reducing the variance of money distribution almost in all runs (except run 6). This strategy has had the overall average variance of 4323.2 for all 10 runs showing the fact that it is the most efficient strategy. The variance values of money distribution for each strategy have been visualized in Figure16. The vertical axis of this figure is values of variance (for better representation) and the horizontal axis stands for number of runs of simula- tion. As it can be seen, the strategy C has had the lowest values of variances in all runs except run 6. Thus, this strategy is regarded to have the highest efficiency. 42 Figure 16: Variance 8.3 Remarks on Simulations These simulations have served two purposes. The first purpose was the expla- nation of how economic inequality emerges in an economic system. Results indicate that in a closed economic system when agents exchange the money, it tends to be accumulated in the hands of a very few number of agents over time. Therefore, the distribution of money in the society will follow a power law distribution. these results have found empirical support from the field of equilibrium statistical mechanics [92, 94]. As a fundamental law of this field, Boltzman-Gibbs law states that in a closed economic system, the total amount of money is conserved because it is not manufactured, consumed or destroyed so any conserved quantity in a big system should follow an expo- nential probability distribution. The second purpose was to simulate how charity and allocation strategies of charity entities can help reduce the eco- nomic inequality emerged in a system. The results showed that charity is highly effective in reducing the gap among economic deciles. So the more people pay charity the more they can decrease the gap. A part from charity, the results imply that the way charity entities allocate the money among lower economic deciles (i.e., bottom 50%) is of paramount importance. In strategy A when system enters a critical stage, just one unit of money (as charity) is transited from the richest agent to poorest one. In strategy B, that amount of money becomes fifty times lager in each transition but the overall average variance (in comparison to average number of return periods) has not had a remarkable decrease. The money is made two times larger in 43 strategy C but it shows a great decrease in overall average variance in con- trast to that of strategy B. The main reason for this is not only because of money volume increase but also largely because of the ways money resources are taken from higher deciles and allocated to lower ones. 9 Conclusion Agent based modeling (ABM) has a high potentiality for modeling systems that are very hard or often impossible to capture by traditional modeling techniques such as PDEs, ODEs and even statistical modeling methods. In addition, ABM has shown a performance far better than a number of simula- tion methods such as discrete-event simulation (DES) and system dynamics (SD). A number of works have been published on this subject most often each of which has particularly dealt with one aspect of ABMs. For examples some works have only discussed the difference between ABM and EBM [4,18]. Some have only dealt with what of ABMs [8, 60, 88, 95 -- 97]and a number of works have just been conducted on issues of ABM verification and valida- tion [31, 76, 86, 98 -- 100], and replication and output analysis [9, 87, 101]. The major focus of this paper has been to help social sciences researchers (partic- ularly economic planners) not only understand ABMs and gain a clear-cut big picture about them but also learn a step-by-step framework for develop- ing them both systematically and rigorously. Like any scientific work, this work has had some limitations. The first limi- tation is the simplicity of the simulated economic systems. So extending the model to more elaborated levels can be a good subject for future studies. For example, human agents can be made more intelligent. They can have memory capacity, networked interactions, abilities for production, consump- tion and destruction, educational level, tendency for entrepreneurship and many other psychophysiological features. Moreover, new agent types can be added, for example, banks, factories, venture capital funds and so on. Such an extension can yield very interesting results. For instance, when factories hire more of their staff among those educated agents that belong to lower economic deciles, venture capital funds define some priorities for poor agents possessing high entrepreneurial tendency and a professional interaction is set among agents, some behavioral patterns will surprisingly emerge both at micro-scale (agent-level) and macro-scale (system-level).The second limi- tation is that just distribution of money has been the subject of this study and distribution of wealth or income has not been simulated. So, extend- ing the system in order to show distribution of wealth and income will be a great contribution that can be made via future studies. The third lim- 44 itation refers to the fact that in this paper, just two thought experiment examples have been provided and the validation process has not been done to full scale because of the space limitation (though it can be inferred via face validation). Therefore, applying the proposed framework for conducting real- world examples with empirical validations can be pursued in future studies. As the fourth limitation, the Netlogo toolkit has not been analyzed in de- tails whereas it has some interestingly applied features for sensitivity analysis (i.e. BehaviorSpace), participatory simulation (i.e. Hubnet) and parameter regimes selection (i.e. Behaviorsearch). So having a specific study on Netlogo features and applications will be very useful for those social scientists who are eager to learn an easy but powerful ABM toolkit. References [1] H. Situngkir, "Epidemiology through cellular automata: case of study avian influenza in Indonesia," arXiv preprint nlin/0403035, 2004. [2] P. Caplat, M. Anand, and C. Bauch, "Symmetric competition causes population oscillations in an individual-based model of forest dynam- ics," ecological modelling, vol. 211, no. 3-4, pp. 491 -- 500, 2008. [3] R. Axelrod, "An evolutionary approach to norms," American political science review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1095 -- 1111, 1986. [4] H. Van Dyke Parunak, R. Savit, and R. L. Riolo, "Agent-Based Mod- eling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users' Guide," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1534, pp. 10 -- 25, 1998. [5] G. Jetly, C. L. Rossetti, and R. Handfield, "A multi-agent simulation of the pharmaceutical supply chain," in Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. Springer, 2014, pp. 133 -- 154. [6] J. M. Swaminathan, S. F. Smith, and N. M. Sadeh, "Modeling supply chain dynamics: A multiagent approach," Decision sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 607 -- 632, 1998. [7] J. Son and E. M. Rojas, "Evolution of collaboration in temporary project teams: An agent-based modeling and simulation approach," Journal of construction engineering and management, vol. 137, no. 8, pp. 619 -- 628, 2010. [8] M. W. Macy and R. Willer, "From Factors to Factors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling," Annual Review of Sociology, 45 vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 143 -- 166, 2002. http: //www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117 [Online]. Available: [9] U. Wilensky and W. Rand, An introduction to agent-based modeling: social, and engineered complex systems with modeling natural, NetLogo. MIT Press, 2015. [10] S. Snyder, "The Simple, the Complicated, and the Complex: Edu- cational Reform Through the Lens of Complexity Theory," OECD Education Working Papers, no. 96, pp. 1 -- 33, 2013. [11] R. K. Merton, "The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action," American sociological review, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 894 -- 904, 1936. [12] J. H. Holland, "Complex adaptive systems and spontaneous emer- Springer, 2002, pp. gence," in Complexity and industrial clusters. 25 -- 34. [13] M. Niazi and A. Hussain, "Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: A visual survey," Scientometrics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 479 -- 499, 2011. [14] L. Gustafsson and M. Sternad, "Bringing consistency to simulation of population modelsPoisson Simulation as a bridge between micro and macro simulation," Mathematical biosciences, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 361 -- 385, 2007. [15] -- -- , "Consistent micro, macro and state-based population modelling," Mathematical biosciences, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 94 -- 107, 2010. [16] F. R. C. Eliot R. Smith, "Agent-Based Modeling: {A} New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology," Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 11, no. 87, pp. 1 -- 56, 2007. [17] M. A. Niazi, "Towards a novel unified framework for developing for- mal, network and validated agent-based simulation models of complex adaptive systems," arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02357, 2017. [18] Y. Sun and L. Cheng, "A Survey on Agent-Based Modelling and Equation-based Modelling," Citeseerx, 2005. [19] B. Heath, R. Hill, and F. Ciarallo, "A survey of agent-based mdeling practices (January 1998 to July 2008)," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 9, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/4/9.html 46 [20] P.-O. Siebers and U. Aickelin, Simulation," SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1 -- 25, 2008. Available: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2827970 "Introduction to Multi-Agent [Online]. [21] P.-O. Siebers, C. M. Macal, J. Garnett, D. Buxton, and M. Pidd, "Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation!" Journal of Simulation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 204 -- 210, 2010. [22] R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray, "Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays," IEEE Transactions on automatic control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1520 -- 1533, 2004. [23] S. A. Kauffman, Investigations. Oxford University Press, 2000. [24] S. Moss, "Alternative Approaches to the Empirical Validation of Agent- Based Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 16, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/5.html [25] S. Chan, "Complex adaptive systems," in ESD. 83 research seminar in engineering systems, vol. 31, 2001, p. 1. [26] G. Nicolis, I. Prigogine, and G. Nocolis, "Exploring complexity," 1989. [27] I. Prigogine and I. Stengers, The end of certainty. Simon and Schus- ter, 1997. [28] E. M. Rogers, U. E. Medina, M. A. Rivera, and C. J. Wiley, "Complex adaptative systems and the diffusion of innovations," The Innovation Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1 -- 26, 2005. [29] H. M. Jaeger and A. J. Liu, "Far-from-equilibrium physics: An overview," arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.4874, 2010. [30] S. . O. Al-suwailem, "Islamic Economics in A Complex World: Explorations in Agent-based Simulation," The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute, pp. 1 -- 106, [Online]. Available: http://www.irti.org/English/Pages/Publications.aspx 2008. [31] P. Windrum, G. Fagiolo, and A. Moneta, "Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects," Jasss, vol. 10, no. 2, 2007. 47 [32] L. Tesfatsion, "Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up," Artificial life, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55 -- 82, 2002. [33] A. P. Kirman, "The economy as an interactive system," in Santa Fe Institute Studies In The Sciences of Complexity of Complexity-proceedings Volume, vol. 27. ADDISON-WESLEY PUB- LISHING CO, 1997, pp. 491 -- 532. [34] A. Kirman, H. Foellmer, and U. Horst, "Equilibrium in financial markets with heterogeneous agents: A new perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 123 -- 155, 2005. [35] G. Dosi and L. Orsenigo, "Macrodynamics and microfoundations: an evolutionary perspective," Economics of Technology//Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 91 -- 123, 1994. [36] G. Fagiolo, "Spatial interactions in dynamic decentralised economies: A review," in The Economics of Networks. Springer, 1998, pp. 53 -- 91. [37] G. Silverberg, G. Dosi, and L. Orsenigo, "Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organisation model," The Economic Journal, vol. 98, no. 393, pp. 1032 -- 1054, 1988. [38] D. A. Lane, "Artificial worlds and economics, part I," Journal of evolutionary economics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89 -- 107, 1993. [39] -- -- , "Artificial worlds and economics, part II," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 177 -- 197, 1993. [40] F. Wall, "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135 -- 193, 2016. [41] R. R. Nelson and S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. press, 1982. G. Winter, harvard university [42] G. M. Hodgson, "The approach of institutional economics," Journal of economic literature, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 166 -- 192, 1998. [43] W. A. Brock and S. N. Durlauf, "Discrete choice with social interac- tions," The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 235 -- 260, 2001. 48 [44] R. L. Axtell, "Zipf distribution of US firm sizes," science, vol. 293, no. 5536, pp. 1818 -- 1820, 2001. [45] H. Gintis, "The economy as a complex adaptive system," 2006. [46] -- -- , "The emergence of a price system from decentralized bilateral exchange," Contributions in Theoretical Economics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1 -- 15, 2006. [47] H. M. Amman, L. Tesfatsion, D. A. Kendrick, K. L. Judd, and J. Rust, Handbook of computational economics. Elsevier, 1996, vol. 2. [48] J. Foster, "Competitive selection, self-organisation and Joseph A. Schumpeter," in Capitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century. Springer, 2001, pp. 317 -- 334. [49] S. C. Bankes, "Agent-based modeling: A revolution?" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. suppl 3, pp. 7199 -- 7200, 2002. [50] J. Epstein, "Why model?" Journal of Artificial Societies and Social . . . , vol. 11, no. 4, p. 6, 2008. [51] S. J. Leal and M. Napoletano, "Market stability vs. market re- silience: Regulatory policies experiments in an agent-based model with low-and high-frequency trading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2017. [52] D. G. Brown, S. Page, R. Riolo, M. Zellner, and W. Rand, "Path dependence and the validation of agentbased spatial models of land use," International journal of geographical information science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 153 -- 174, 2005. [53] P. Blikstein and U. Wilensky, "An atom is known by the company it keeps: A constructionist learning environment for materials science using agent-based modeling," International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 81 -- 119, 2009. [54] U. Wilensky and K. Reisman, "Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a fire- fly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theoriesan embodied modeling approach," Cognition and instruction, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 171 -- 209, 2006. 49 [55] P. Sengupta and U. Wilensky, "Learning electricity with NIELS: Think- ing with electrons and thinking in levels," International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21 -- 50, 2009. [56] G. Helfman, B. B. Collette, D. E. Facey, and B. W. Bowen, John Wiley The diversity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. & Sons, 2009. [57] R. A. Sorensen, Thought experiments. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1998. [58] R. Rangoni, "From Informal Thought Experiments to Agent-Based Models A Progressive Account of Modeling in the Social Sciences," in Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Springer, 2014, pp. 471 -- 478. [59] P. Savona, "On the definition of Political Economy and on the Met- bod of Investigation Proper to It: Reflections on the Bicentennial of the Birth of John Stuart Mill," Journal of european economic history, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 573 -- 598, 2005. [60] J. M. Epstein and R. Axtell, "Artificial societies and generative social science," Artificial Life and Robotics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33 -- 34, 1997. [61] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Malaysia; Pearson Education Limited,, 2016. [62] P. Erdos and A. R´enyi, "On random graphs, I," Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), vol. 6, pp. 290 -- 297, 1959. [63] D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of small- world'networks," nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, p. 440, 1998. [64] R. Albert and A.-L. Barab´asi, "Statistical mechanics of complex net- works," Reviews of modern physics, vol. 74, no. 1, p. 47, 2002. [65] M. Newman, Networks: an introduction. Oxford university press, 2010. [66] S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press, 1994, vol. 8. [67] K. H. Van Dam, I. Nikolic, and Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. ence & Business Media, 2012, vol. 9. Z. Lukszo, Springer Sci- 50 [68] J. H. Conway, On numbers and games. Academic press London, 1976, vol. 6. [69] S. Wolfram, "Statistical mechanics of cellular automata," Reviews of modern physics, vol. 55, no. 3, p. 601, 1983. [70] C. Elsenbroich and N. Gilbert, Modelling norms. Springer, 2014. [71] W. Rand and U. Wilensky, "Full Spectrum Modeling: From Simplic- ity to Elaboration and Realism in Urban Pattern Formation," North american association computational social and organization sciences conference (NAACSOS), pp. 1 -- 10, 2007. [72] K. Frenken, "Technological innovation and complexity theory," Economics of Innovation & New Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 137 -- 155, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com.proxy. library.adelaide.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/10438590500141453{%} 5Cnhttp://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P{&} P=AN{&}K=19937481{&}S=R{&}D=bth{&}EbscoContent= dGJyMNLe80SeqLE4xNvgOLCmr0qep69SsKa4TbWWxWXS{&} ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGntU [73] O. . O. Barreteau, "Our Companion Modelling Approach," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1 -- 7, 2003. [74] S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, "The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science," Ecological economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 197 -- 207, 1994. [75] M. A. Niazi and A. Hussain, Cognitive agent-based computing-I: a unified framework for modeling complex adaptive systems using agent-based & complex network-based methods. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. [76] M. Niazi, Muaz A; Hussain, Amir; Kolberg, "Verification &Validation of Agent Based Simulations using theVOMAS (Virtual Overlay Multi- agent System) approach," arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02361, 2017. [77] V. Colella, "Participatory simulations: Building collaborative under- standing through immersive dynamic modeling," The journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 471 -- 500, 2000. [78] S. Frey and R. L. Goldstone, "Cyclic game dynamics driven by iterated reasoning," PloS one, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e56416, 2013. 51 [79] S. Abar, G. K. Theodoropoulos, P. Lemarinier, and G. M. O'Hare, "Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state- of-art software," Computer Science Review, vol. 24, pp. 13 -- 33, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001 [80] N. Gilbert and S. Bankes, "Platforms and methods for agent-based modeling," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. Supplement 3, pp. 7197 -- 7198, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.072079499 [81] C. Nikolai of and G. Madey, Agent Various "Tools Based Modeling of 2, 2009. Survey Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, no. com/login.aspx?direct=true{&}profile=ehost{&}scope=site{&} authtype=crawler{&}jrnl=14607425{&}AN=41787498{&}h=Dc/ AaV8t+CayxNXXKW9/JBWkQ31y27FP7icWe7V3oyzWAHsdBA+ 6fcdgnRIkjtCV7NkGrEhmrWlKdt3nEtp2bA=={&}crl=c [Online]. Available: the Trade: A Platforms." vol. 12, http://search.ebscohost. [82] H. Bersini, "UML for ABM," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 9, 2012. [83] W. Rand and R. T. Rust, "Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor," International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 181 -- 193, 2011. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002 [Online]. Available: [84] K. Carley, "Validating computational models," Paper available at http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu, vol. 0793, no. September, 1996. [85] R. Garcia, P. Rummel, and J. Hauser, "Validating agent-based market- ing models through conjoint analysis," Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 848 -- 857, 2007. [86] X. Pullum, Laura L; Cui, "Techniques and Issues in Agent-Based Mod- eling Validation," Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, pp. 5 -- 6, 2012. [87] R. Axtell, R. M. Axelrod, J. M. Epstein, and M. D. Cohen, "Align- ing simulation models: a case study and results," Computational {&} Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 123 -- 141, 1996. [88] R. Axtell, "Why agents?: on the varied motivations for agent comput- ing in the social sciences," 2000. 52 [89] R. Sun, Cognition and multi-agent interaction: From cognitive modeling to social simulation. Cambridge University Press, 2006. [90] G. ten Broeke, G. van Voorn, and A. Ligtenberg, "Which Sensitivity Analysis Method Should I Use for My Agent-Based Model?" Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1 -- 35, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/19/1/5.html [91] H. Sabzian, A. Aliahmadi, A. Azar, and M. Mirzaee, "Economic in- equality and Islamic Charity: An exploratory agent-based modeling approach," arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09284, 2018. [92] A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko, "Statistical mechanics of money," The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 723 -- 729, 2000. [93] J. C. Ferrero, "The statistical distribution of money and the rate of money transference," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 341, pp. 575 -- 585, 2004. [94] V. M. Yakovenko and J. B. Rosser, "Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1703 -- 1725, 2009. [95] E. Chattoe-Brown, "Why sociology should use agent based modelling," Sociological Research Online, 2013. [96] J. M. Epstein, "Agentbased computational models and generative social science," Complexity, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 41 -- 60, 1999. [Online]. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199905/06) 4:5{%}3C41::AID-CPLX9{%}3E3.3.CO;2-6 [97] B. L. Heath and R. R. Hill, "Some insights into the emergence of agent- based modelling," Journal of Simulation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 163 -- 169, 2010. [98] A. M. Law, "How to build valid and credible simulation models," in IEEE, 2008, pp. Simulation Conference, 2008. WSC 2008. Winter. 39 -- 47. [99] M. Stone, "Cross-validation and multinomial prediction," Biometrika, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 509 -- 515, 1974. 53 [100] X. Xiang, R. Kennedy, and G. Madey, "Verification and Validation of Agent-based Scientific Simulation Models," in Agent-Directed Simulation Conference, 2005, pp. 47 -- 55. [Online]. Available: http: //www.nd.edu/{∼}nom/Papers/ADS019{ }Xiang.pdf [101] J. S. Lee, T. Filatova, A. Ligmann-Zielinska, B. Hassani-Mahmooei, F. Stonedahl, I. Lorscheid, A. Voinov, G. Polhill, Z. Sun, and D. C. Parker, "The complexities of agent-based modeling output analysis," Jasss, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1 -- 26, 2015. 54
1812.10038	1	1812	2018-12-25T05:41:08	Duesenberry's Theory of Consumption: Habit, Learning, and Ratcheting	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper investigates the consumption and risk taking decision of an economic agent with partial irreversibility of consumption decision by formalizing the theory proposed by Duesenberry (1949). The optimal policies exhibit a type of the (s, S) policy: there are two wealth thresholds within which consumption stays constant. Consumption increases or decreases at the thresholds and after the adjustment new thresholds are set. The share of risky investment in the agent's total investment is inversely U-shaped within the (s, S) band, which generates time-varying risk aversion that can fluctuate widely over time. This property can explain puzzles and questions on asset pricing and households' portfolio choices, e.g., why aggregate consumption is so smooth whereas the high equity premium is high and the equity return has high volatility, why the risky share is so low whereas the estimated risk aversion by the micro-level data is small, and whether and when an increase in wealth has an impact on the risky share. Also, the partial irreversibility model can explain both the excess sensitivity and the excess smoothness of consumption.	econ.TH	econ	Duesenberry's Theory of Consumption: Habit, Learning, and Ratcheting∗ Kyoung Jin Choi† Junkee Jeon‡ Hyeng Keun Koo§ December 27, 2018 Abstract This paper investigates the consumption and risk taking decision of an economic agent with partial irreversibility of consumption decision by formalizing the theory proposed by Duesenberry (1949). The optimal policies exhibit a type of the (s, S) policy: there are two wealth thresholds within which consumption stays constant. Consumption increases or decreases at the thresholds and after the adjustment new thresholds are set. The share of risky investment in the agent's total investment is inversely U-shaped within the (s, S) band, which generates time-varying risk aversion that can fluctuate widely over time. This property can explain puzzles and questions on asset pricing and households' portfolio choices, e.g., why aggregate consumption is so smooth whereas the high equity premium is high and the equity return has high volatility, why the risky share is so low whereas the estimated risk aversion by the micro-level data is small, and whether and when an increase in wealth has an impact on the risky share. Also, the partial irreversibility model can explain both the excess sensitivity and the excess smoothness of consumption. JEL Classification Codes: D11, E21, G11 Keywords: Duesenberry, consumption, portfolio choice, adjustment costs, time-varying risk aversion, habit formation, permanent income hypothesis, excess sensitivity, excess smoothness ∗We thank participants of the JAFEE-Columbia-NUS Conference, Tokyo, Japan, the Asian Finance Quan- titative Finance Conference, Guangzhou, China and the Quantitative Methods in Finance Conference 2018 in Sydney for helpful and encouraging comments. We thank Philip Dybvig for his inspiring work and discussions which provided motivation for this work. †E-mail: [email protected], Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada. ‡E-mail: [email protected], Department of Applied Mathematics, Kyung Hee University, Korea. §E-mail: [email protected], Department of Financial Engineering, Ajou University, Korea. 1 1 Introduction This critique is based on a demonstration that two fundamental assumptions of aggregate demand theory are invalid. These assumptions are (1) that every individual's consumption behaviour is independent of that of every other indi- vidual, and (2) that consumption relations are reversible in time (Duesenberry, 1949). This paper analyzes a model of consumption and portfolio choice decision. Building on the second part of the quote by Duesenberry (1949) as a critique of the Keynesian con- sumption function, we aim to model the irreversibility of consumption decision. However, we are also aware that each consumption decision is not fully irreversible, but partially irreversible. Thus, we model the partial irreversibility by introducing proportional costs for each consumption adjustment. The partial irreversibility makes consumption a non- smooth function of wealth and change infrequently over time, demonstrating the excess sensitivity and the excess smoothness for moderate shocks. The risky share of the house- hold is U-shaped, which can reconcile several conflicting views in the literature, regarding time-varying risk aversion and the impact of a wealth change on risky investments. In our model, conditional on consumption never changing, the household has the von-Neuman Morgenstern preference such as the constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) preference. However, there is a utility cost proportional to the current level of marginal utility whenever the household increases or decreases the consumption level. The former is a learning cost in increasing the consumption level1 and the latter represents consumption ratcheting. Note that the existence of the utility cost from decreasing consumption is important in our model since the model can generate all the properties derived in our model only with the cost of downward adjustment.2 The optimal polices exhibit a (s, S) type of policy as follows. Suppose the current consumption level is c. Then, there are two wealth thresholds cx and c¯x, where x and ¯x are constants, i.e., the current (s, S) band is interval (cx, c¯x). In this case, consumption increases and decreases if and only if the wealth level hits cx and c¯x, respectively. Other- wise, consumption stays constant inside the band. Once a boundary is reached, the new consumption level, cnew is set and the next new (s, S) band is updated as (cnewx, cnew ¯x). The adjustment is made whenever there is a change in consumption. We describe how each new consumption level is determined in more detail in the main body of the paper. 1For example, consider a household who lives in Chicago and goes for a vacation within the U.S. once per year. Suppose the family has a permanent increase in income and decides to visit Europe for a regular vacation from this year. Our assumption implies that the household incurs search or learning costs when preparing to visit a new place. We do not consider a monetary cost of search that should follow every consumption decision. Rather, our model assumes that there is one time utility cost of searching or learning the new consumption pattern when they increase the consumption level. 2In addition, the cost of upward adjustment is usually very small in our calibration exercise. We can set it to be zero and generate the same resultf by slightly changing values of other variables. 2 The optimal risky share is U-shaped in wealth for each (s, S) band. The risky asset holdings consist of two components: the myopic component and the hedging component. Noticing the minus sign in this decomposition, the hedging demand takes zero at the boundaries of each (s, S) interval and the maximum value inside the interval. The reason is to avoid a high utility cost that would be incurred if the household frequently adjusted its consumption. Therefore, the risky share is U-shaped with the maximum at the one of the boundaries, the minimum somewhere inside the interval. On the other hand, naturally there is heterogeneity among households in utility costs as well as risk aversion. Naturally arises the question of how to infer risk aversion of a certain household. We define RCRRA (revealed coefficient of relative risk aversion) by risk aversion inferred by the outsider observing the risky asset holdings of a household over time. Since the risky share is time-varying, the RCRRA is time-varying. Moreover, the RCRRA is inverse U-shaped inside the (s, S) boundary since the risky share is U-shaped. Having the above properties in mind, our model can explain a number of interesting implications for the household consumption and risky investment decisions. First, our model can fill a gap between different views on risk aversion in the literature on decision theory, structural estimation, behavioral, and asset pricing. Note that most asset pricing models use the relative risk aversion coefficient of around 10 or higher for calibration exer- cises to match asset pricing moments (e.g., Bansal et al. (2012), Cocco et al. (2005), and references therein3). Along the similar lines, households usually hold 6 − 20% in equity (conditional on participation, up to 40 %), which implies relative risk aversion is at least 10 or larger following calibration according to the standard models with widely accepted market parameter values. On the contrary, the estimated individual relative risk aversion takes values between 0.7 and 2 in decision theory, structural estimation, or behavioral literature such as Bombardini and Trebbi (2012), Campo et al. (2011), Chetty (2006), Gandelman and Hernndez-Murillo (2013, 2015), Hansen and Singleton (1982), Layard, Mayraz, and Nickel (2008), and Szpiro (1986), among which more recent ones tend to claim that risk aversion is less than 1 or around 1. We show that time-varying risk aversion, i.e., RCRRA in our model is the same as actual risk aversion only when the wealth process hits either one of (s, S) boundaries. The set of these events, however, has measure zero for any stock price sample path. The RCRRA is greater than actual risk aversion for most of times. We note that the maximum value of RCRRA increases with the consumption adjustment costs (RCRRA is always equal to risk aversion if there is no such cost). We show that the RCRRA takes fairly high values closer to its maximum than actual risk aversion during the times when the wealth process stays in the middle range of the (s, S) band and does not have high fluctuation: These are times when the market is neither bullish nor bearish, rather has small volatility for a while. This feature is in sharp contrast with that from traditional 3There are many other asset pricing models to suggest even much higher value than 10. For example, Kandel and Stambaugh (1991) argues γ = 29. 3 habit models since risk aversion in the habit models becomes higher only in downturns. For example, Otrok et al. (2002) show that the size of equity premium in the traditional habit model is determined by a relatively insignificant amount of high-frequency volatility in US aggregate consumption. Moderate shocks have occurred in the world financial markets over substantial time periods when the RCRRA takes high values in our model. Therefore, our model can generate the average value of RCRRA consistent with that often used in the asset pricing literature, while the coefficient of relative risk aversion is close to that suggested by the behavioral or experimental literature. Second, but more important is that the U-shaped risky share resulted from our model has an interesting implication for the effect of the change of wealth on the risky share on which the empirical literature looks inclusive. For example, Calvet et al. (2009) and Calvet and Sodini (2014) favor habit, commitment, or DARA (decreasing relative risk aversion) models predicting that the impact is positive, i.e., the risky share increases with an increase in financial wealth. Brunnermeier and Nagel (2008) and Chiappori and Paiella (2011), however, show no relationship (or slightly positive relationship, if any) between the financial (liquid) wealth change and the risky share. We argue that both can happen depending on which time-series is chosen. The U-shape implies that the risky share is decreasing in wealth in the left side of (s, S) band and increasing in wealth in the right side of (s, S) band (see Figure 10). The optimal wealth process tends to stay longer in the increasing (decreasing) regions of each (s, S) interval over time if the market is such that good shocks are more frequent than bad shocks (see Figure 3 and its description). Thus, if good shocks occurred more frequently in the stock market during the data period, the relationship tends to be positive. By using this intuition, we simulate four types of sample paths: (a) bullish, (b) intermediate, (c) bearish, and (d) highly fluctuating. Then, we regress the change of risky share on the change of financial wealth within each sample. For cases (a) and (b), we find a significant positive impact of the wealth increase on the risky share. Moreover, we find no or slightly negative relationship for cases (c) and (d). Thus, our model can reconcile the discrepancy in the empirical literature. Third, the optimal consumption process in our model features two well-documented empirical regularities: the excess smoothness (Deaton, 1987) and the excess sensitivity (Flavin, 1981). First, consumption tends not to respond to a permanent shock as long as the shock does not push up or down the wealth level to one of the (s, S) boundaries, which implies the excess smoothness. Second, suppose there is a good shock in the permanent income. While this shock may not increase the current consumption level, it increases the probability that consumption will increase in the future, by which the excess sensitivity of consumption appears in our model. By the same reason, however, both the excess smoothness and the excess sensitivity vanish for a large shock that immediately pushes the wealth process up or down to either of the (s, S) boundaries. In other words, the partial irreversibility of consumption in our model implies that consumption responds to a large shock consistent with the permanent income hypothesis (Jappelli and Pistaferri (2010)). 4 Fourth, we explore asset pricing implications and find that our partial reversibility model has a potential to well the U.S. data well. We follow Constantinides (1990) and Marshall and Parekh (1999), simulate optimal consumption of individuals, and obtain a simulated series of monthly aggregate consumption. We compute several moments such as the consumption growth rate, the standard deviation of marginal rate of intertemporal substitution, and the autocorrelation of consumption growth rate. We find that our model matches better the US data than the traditional habit models. Finally, our paper also makes a theoretical contribution to the literature of dynamic optimization. We first transform the dynamic consumption and portfolio selection prob- lem into a static one, and then derive the dual Lagrangian problem. The advantage of solving the dual Lagrangian problem is that we do not need to consider the portfolio choice and we are left to analyze two sided singular control problem (of consumption). After each adjustment of consumption, the problem is to decide whether to increase or to decrease consumption and if so, how much to change. Then, the original value function is obtained from the convex duality relation. We characterize the full analytic solution. The optimal portfolio can be derived from the dual value function by the convex duality and It´o's lemma. The detail for each step is presented in the appendix. 1.1 Literature Review Our paper is motivated from Duesenberry (1949). On one hand, the first part of his critique quoted in the beginning of our introduction is closely related to external habit formation and thus has significantly contributed to developing the modern habit models such as Abel (1990), Constantinides (1990), and Campbell and Cochrane (1999). Some of our results resemble those from habit model. For example, our model generates time- varying risk aversion. However, ours are fundamentally different from habit models in that the agent in habit models becomes more conservative when the current consumption level gets closer to the habit stock (e.g., in downturns) while RCRRA in our model becomes higher in times when the stock market is neither bullish nor bearis, but rather flat and has low volatility. On the other hand, there is a handful of previous literature that grew out from the second part of the critique such as Dybvig (1995) and Jeon et al. (2018).4 However, Dybvig (1995) and Jeon et al. (2018) assume that consumption decision is fully irreversible (other than allowing a predetermined depreciation). Therefore, they are an 4Note that the second part of critique is well described as follows: At any moment a consumer already has a well-established set of consumption habits... Suppose a man suffers a 50 per cent reduction in his income and expects this reduction to be permanent. Immediately after the change he will tend to act in the same way as before... In retrospect he will regret some of his expenditures. In the ensuing periods the same stimuli as before will arise, but eventually he will learn to reject some expenditures and respond by buying cheap substitutes for the goods formerly purchased (Dusenberry 1949, p. 24). 5 extreme special case of our model.5 We better formulate the ratchet effect with partial irreversibility by allowing costly downward adjustment, which generates the U-shape risky share and its novel implications that Dybvig (1995) and Jeon et al. (2018) do not. Our model is also related to dynamic consumption and investment models with durable consumption or consumption commitment such as Grossman and Laroque (1990), Hindy and Huang (1992, 1993), Hindy et al. (1997), Flavin and Nakagawa (2008), and Chetty and Szeidl (2007, 2016). We view our model as complement to the consumption commitment lit- erature. For example, Chetty and Szeidl (2016) show in the commitment model that the excess smoothness and excess sensitivity arise for moderate shocks and they vanish for large shocks. The same result holds from a different channel in our model, namely through learning or adjustment costs. In our model there exist two different adjustment costs, downward and upward adjustment costs. Thus magnitude of large shocks which make immediate adjustment and individuals aggressive in risk taking is in general differ- ent for good shock and for bad shocks. This paves a way for empirical test whether the effects of large shock on consumption and risk taking are different for these two different shocks. Furthermore, our model generalizes the models of consumption and portfolio se- lection with durability and local substitution by Hindy and Huang (1992) and Hindy et al. (1997) via the isomorphism discovered by Schroder and Skiadas (2002). The rest of the paper continues as follows. Section 2 describes the model. 3 present the analysis for the explicit solution. The implications of risky investment and consumption are provided in Sections 4 and 5, respectively. Section 6 concludes. 2 Model We consider a simple and standard continuous-time financial market. The financial market consists of two assets: a riskless asset and a risky asset. We assume that the risk-free rate, the rate of return on the riskless asset, is constant and equal to r. The price St of the risky asset or the market Index evolves as follows: dSt/St = µdt + σdBt, where µ, σ are constants, µ > r, and Bt is a Brownian motion on a standard probability space (Ω, F , P)6 endowed with an augmented filtration {Ft}t≥0 generated by the Brownian motion Bt. The agent's wealth process (Xt)∞ t=0 evolves according to the following dynamics: dXt = [rXt + πt(µ − r) − ct]dt + σπtdBt, X0 = X > 0, (1) 5More precisely, Dybvig (1995) and Jeon et al. (2018) assume that consumption is not allowed to decrease. The model converges to those of Dybvig (1995) and Jeon et al. (2018) if the cost of decreasing consumption goes to infinite and the cost of increasing consumption is equal to zero in our model. 6See Karatzas and Shreve (1998) for details of mathematics and the probability theory. 6 where ct ≥ 0 and πt are the consumption rate and the dollar amount invested in the risky asset, respectively, at time t. For non-negative constants α and β, the agent's utility function is given by U ≡ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αd(u(ct))+ − βd(u(ct))−(cid:1)(cid:21) , (2) where δ > 0 is the subjective discount rate and u(·) is a twice-continuously differentiable, strictly concave, and strictly increasing function. We decompose u(ct) = u(c0) + u(ct)+ − u(ct)−, where u(ct)+ and u(ct)− are non-decreasing processes. This decomposition is well-defined (2) if the consumption process ct is admissible (See Definition 2.1 and equation (4)). implies that the agent instantaneously loses the α or β unit of utility whenever there is one unit increase or decrease in the marginal utility. The example of the first kind is the utility cost of learning how to spend and that of the second is the point made by models with "catching up with Joneses" such as Abel (1990), Constantinides (1990), Gali (1994) and Campbell and Cochrane (1999). In this paper, we assume the constant relative risk aversion(CRRA) utility function: u(c) = c1−γ 1 − γ , γ > 0, γ 6= 1, (3) where γ is the agent's risk coefficient of relative risk aversion. To define the strategy set, we denote by Π the family of all c´agl´ad, Ft-adapted, non- decreasing process with starting at 0 and assume that there exist c+, c− ∈ Π such that the agent's consumption ct can be expressed by ct = c + c+ t − c− t , (4) where c is the agent's initial consumption rate. Then, the agent's objective (2) is rewritten as U ≡ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) . We define the set of consumption and risky investment strategies as follows. Definition 2.1. We call a consumption-portfolio plans (c+, c−, π) admissible if (a) A consumption strategy (c+, c−) satisfies (5) (6) E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt + αu′(ct)dc+ t + βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) < ∞. We denote by Π(c) the class of all consumption strategies (c+, c−) satisfying the condition (6). (b) For all t ≥ 0, πt is measurable process with repsect to Ft satisfying π2 s ds < +∞, a.e. Z t 0 7 (7) (c) For all t ≥ 0, the wealth process is non-negative, i.e., Xt ≥ 0. (8) The following assumption should be satisfied in order to guarantee the existence of the special case of α = β = 0, i.e., the classical Merton problem. Assumption 1. K ≡ r + δ − r γ + γ − 1 2γ2 θ2 > 0. If the agent instantaneously increases her consumption by a small amount, from c to c + ∆c between t and t + ∆t, the intertemporal utility gain from the additional consump- u′(c)∆c. On the other hand, the utility loss from the tion is consumption increase is αu′(c)∆c. The gain should be greater than the loss. Otherwise, (u(c + ∆c) − u(c)) ≈ 1 δ 1 δ the agent will never increase consumption in our model. This observation leads to the following assumption. Assumption 2. 0 ≤ δα < 1. There is no parameter restriction for β ∈ [0, ∞). The problem studied by Dybvig (1995) is an extreme case of ours. Dybvig (1995) consider the case when α = 0 and β → ∞, which means there is no utility cost of increasing consumption and infinity utility loss from decreasing consumption (i.e., ratcheting of consumption). Now we state the problem as follows. Problem 1 (Primal Problem (Dynamic Version)). Given c0 = c > 0 and X0 = X > 0, we consider the following utility maximization problem: V (X, c) = sup E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− (9) t (cid:1)(cid:21) where the supremum is taken over all admissible consumption/portfolio plans (c+, c−, π) subject to the wealth process (1). Note that Problem 1 is subject to the dynamics budget constraint (1). In Section 3.1, we first transform Problem 1 into a static problem (Problem 2) by the well-known method of linearizing the budget constraint suggested by Karatzas et al. (1987) and Cox and Huang (1989). Finally we transform that static problem to a singular control problem (Problem 3). Theorem 3.1 shows that the solution to Problem 1 is recovered from the solution to Problem 3 by the duality relationship. We will obtain the solution to Problem 3 and characterize optimal policies by using it in later sections. Note that the advantages of dealing with the singular control problem in Problem 3 are described right below the problem statement. 8 3 Solution Analysis 3.1 The Problem Reformulation In order to reformulate Problem 1, first we transform the wealth process satisfying (1) into a static budget constraint. For this purpose we define, for t ≥ 0, θ ≡ µ − r σ , ξt ≡ e−rtZt, and Zt ≡ e− 1 2 θ2t−θBt. Let us define an equivalent measure Q by setting dQ dP = ZT , (10) so that the process BQ Then, the wealth process (1) is changed by t = Bt + θt is a standard Brownian motion under the measure Q. dXt = [rXt − ct]dt + σπtdBQ t . (11) Applying Fatou's lemma and Bayes' rule to e−rtXt, we get the following static budget constraint: E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 ξtctdt(cid:21) ≤ X. (12) where X is the initial wealth level, i.e., X0 = X. Then, we restate Problem 1 as the following problem. Problem 2 (Primal Problem (Static Version)). Given c0 = c > 0 and X0 = X > 0, we consider the following utility maximization problem: V (X, c) = sup E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t (cid:1)(cid:21) t − βu′(ct)dc− (13) where the supremum is taken over all admissible consumption/portfolio plans (c+, c−, π) subject to the static budget constraint (12). By following Cox and Huang (1989) and Karatzas et al. (1987), it is easy to see that the solution to Problem 1 is the same as that to Problem 2. Thus, henceforth the both problems are called the primal problem in this paper. Using the static budget constraint (12), we consider the following Lagrangian: 0 L =E(cid:20)Z ∞ =E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 t − βu′(ct)dc− e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ e−δt(cid:0)(u(ct) − yeδtξtct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t (cid:1)(cid:21) + y(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ t (cid:1)(cid:21) + yX, t − βu′(ct)dc− 0 ξtctdt(cid:21)(cid:19) (14) where y > 0 is the Lagrange multiplier for the budget constraint. We define the process yt = yeδtξt, t ≥ 0 9 which plays the role of the Lagrange multiplier for the budget constraint at time t, and thus (yt)∞ t=0 represents the marginal utility(shadow price) of wealth process. We will describe how the marginal utility of wealth process is related to the agent's optimal consumption policy. Now we introduce the dual problem of Problem 1 or Problem 2: Problem 3 (Dual problem). J(y, c) = sup (c+,c−)∈Π(c) = sup (c+,c−)∈Π(c) where 0 E(cid:20)Z ∞ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)(u(ct) − ytct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ e−δt(cid:0)h(yt, ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) , t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) (15) h(y, c) = u(c) − yc. and Π(c) is the class of all consumption strategies (c+, c−) satisfying the condition (6). Problem 3 is the optimization problem with singular controls over Π(c). There are two advantages in dealing with the dual problem. The first advantage is that we do not need to consider the portfolio choice. This property is, in fact, inherited from the formulation of Problem 2. The second advantage is that now the agent's problem becomes a singular control problem of deciding either to increase or decrease the level of consumption given the current consumption c. Therefore, we can apply a standard method of singular control problem developed by Davis and Norman (1990) or Fleming and Soner (2006). 3.2 Solution: Dual Value Function The dual value function J(y, c) satisfies the following Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman(HJB) equation: max{LJ(y, c) + u(c) − yc, Jc(y, c) − αu′(c), −Jc − βu′(c)} = 0, (y, c) ∈ R (16) where R ≡ R+ × R+ and the differential operator L is given by L = θ2 2 y2 ∂2 ∂y2 + (δ − r)y ∂ ∂y − δ. To solve the HJB equation (16), we define the increasing region IR, the decreasing region DR and the non-adjustment region NR as follows: IR = {(y, c) ∈ R Jc(y, c) = αu′(c)}, NR = {(y, c) ∈ R −βu′(c) < Jc(y, c) < αu′(c)}, (17) DR = {(y, c) ∈ R Jc(y, c) = −βu′(c)}. In what follows in this subsection we describe the explicit form of the dual value function in each region. First, as shown in Appendix A, the regions IR, NR and DR are rewritten 10 by IR = {(y, c) ∈ R y ≤ u′(c)bα}, NR = {(y, c) ∈ R u′(c)bα < y < u′(c)bβ}, DR = {(y, c) ∈ R u′(c)bβ ≤ y}, respectively. See Figure 1 for the graphical representation of each region. It is important to characterize IR-, NR- and DR-regions in order to understand the optimal strategies, which will be investigated in great detail in Section 3.3. Here, bα and bβ are given by bα = (1 − δα) m1 − 1 m1 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 > 0 and bβ = (1 + δβ) m1 − 1 m1 wm1 − κ wm1 − w > 0 with κ = equation: 1 − δα 1 + δβ . m1 and m2 are positive and negative roots of following quadratic θ2 2 m2 + (δ − r − θ2 2 )m − δ = 0. Moreover, w is a unique solution to the equation f (w) = 0 in (0, 1), where f (w) = (m1 − 1)m2(1 − w1−m2 )(wm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(wm1 − w)(1 − κw−m2 ). (18) In the following proposition, we provide a solution to Problem 3. Proposition 3.1. The dual value function J(y, c) of Problem 3 is given by  J(y, c) = where D1 = D1yc (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 + D2yc (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1 + 1 δ c1−γ 1 − γ − yc r , J(cid:18)y, I( J(cid:18)y, I( y bα y bβ )(cid:19) + α(cid:18)u(c) − u(I( )(cid:19) − β(cid:18)u(c) − u(I( y bα y bβ ))(cid:19) , ))(cid:19) , for (y, c) ∈ NR, for (y, c) ∈ IR, for (y, c) ∈ DR, (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r m2 − m1 , D2 = (α − 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bα r m1 − m2 (19) . Proof. The proof is given in Appendix A. Finally we summarize the duality relationship between the value function of the primal problem and the dual value function of Problem 3 in the following theorem. Theorem 3.1. For the value function V (X, c) of Problem 1 and dual value function J(y, c) of Problem 3, the following duality relationship is established: In addition, there exists a unique solution y∗ for the minimization problem (20). V (X, c) = min y>0 (J(y, c) + yX) . (20) Proof. The proof is given in Appendix B. 11 3.3 Optimal strategies dual variable y ✻ (DR-region) y = u′(c)bβ ✡✡ ✡ ✡ ❄ (NR-region) ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✻ ✡ ✡ ✡ (u′(c0), y0) ✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟ y = u′(c)bα (IR-region) ❄ ✻ ✲ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ 0 marginal utility u′(c) Figure 1: DR-region, NR-region, and IR-region Refer Figure 1 for the graphical representation of the optimal consumption behavior. If the initial consumption level c0 is such that y0/u′(c0) lies in the increasing region IR or the decreasing region DR, it jumps immediately to the non-adjustment region NR. Suppose the level of consumption is such that y0/u′(c0) lies inside the NR-region. The level of consumption stays constant during the time yt-process lies inside the NR-region. Consumption jumps down if and only if yt process hits u′(c0)bβ and it jumps up if and only if yt hits u′(c0)bα. In this case, the question is how much the consumption level jumps up or down. Proposition 3.2 explicitly characterizes the amount of the jump at each time when there is a consumption adjustment. Proposition 3.2. The optimal consumption c∗ t for t ≥ 0 is given by t = c0 + c∗,+ c∗ t − c∗,− t , where y∗ t = y∗eδtξt and y∗ is the unique solution to the minimization problem (20) and c∗,+ t = max(0, −c0 + sup t = max(0, s∈[0,t)(cid:18)c∗,− s∈[0,t)(cid:18)c∗,+ c0 + sup c∗,− s + I( s − I( y∗ s bα y∗ s bβ )(cid:19)) , )(cid:19)) . (21) Proof. The proof is given in Appendix C. Processes c∗,+ t and c∗,− t the NR-region. c∗,+ t and c∗,− t are non-decreasing regulators such that y∗ t ) lies inside stay mostly constant. Consumption increases whenever t /u′(c∗ 12 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (a) yt u′(c∗ t ) (b) c∗ t 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (c) c∗,+ (d) c∗,− Figure 2: Simulation of optimal consumption, y/u′(c∗), c∗,+ and c∗,− with α = 5, β = 10. The other parameter values are as follows: ρ = 0.02, µ = 0.085, r = 0.015, σ = 0.25, γ = 2, X = 50, c = 1 and T = 80. increases, but consumption decreases whenever c∗,− c∗,+ t seen in Figure 1, the process c∗,+ and increases if and only if y∗ also stays constant within the non-adjustment region NR. c∗,− t hits the free boundary bβ. Figure 2 plots sample paths of c∗,+ y∗ those of stays constant within the non-adjustment region NR t /u′(ct) hits the free boundary bα. Similarly, the process c∗,− increases if and only if and c∗,− t . See Figure 2 for simulated paths of increases. More precisely, as t , c∗,− t together with , and c∗ t . and c∗ t t t yt t ) , c∗,+ t u′(c∗ yt u′(c∗ t ) t t Proposition 3.2 describes the consumption path according to the ratio of the shadow price of wealth to the marginal utility process. Then, how is the consumption process related to the agent's wealth process? The following theorem provides the answer to this question. Theorem 3.2. Pick an arbitrary time s ≥ 0 and let c∗ at s for some constant c > 0. For t ≥ s, the optimal consumption is fixed as c∗ s = c be the optimal consumption t = c during the time in which yt is inside the NR region (by Proposition 3.2). In this case, 13 the optimal wealth process X ∗ t follows X ∗ t = c r − c D1m1 (1 − γ + γm1)bα (cid:18) y∗ c−γbα(cid:19)m1−1 t + D2m2 (1 − γ + γm2)bα (cid:18) y∗ c−γbα(cid:19)m2−1! . t (22) t = c for t ≥ s if and In addition, there exist two positive numbers x and ¯x such that c∗ only if x < X ∗ t c < ¯x or cx < X ∗ t < c¯x. (23) The explicit forms of x and ¯x are given in the proof. Proof. The proof is given in Appendix D. Suppose c∗ s = c is the optimal consumption level at a certain time s as in Theorem 3.2. Equation (22) explicitly describes the optimal wealth process during the times when the shadow value of wealth, yt-process stays inside the NR-region for t ≥ s. The consumption level increases according to the first equation in (21) if and only if yt hits the lower threshold u′(cs)bα or touches the IR-region. The latter part of Theorem 3.2 t hits the upper threshold c ¯X. tells that this condition is equivalent to the case when X ∗ Conversely, the consumption level decreases according to the second equation in (21) if and only if yt hits the upper threshold u′(cs)bβ or touches the DR-region. This condition is equivalent to the case when X ∗ t hits the lower threshold cx. A ✑ ✑ initial wealth X0 B c0 ¯x c0x ✛ ✲ wealth Xt (c = c0) ❩ ❩ ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑ Xt hits c0x and decreases to cdx (bad shock) with cd < c0. ✑ ✑ ✑ ✑✑✰ ❩ ❩ ❩ Xt hits c0 ¯x and increases to cu ¯x (good shock) ❩ with cu > c0 ❩ ❩ ❩❩⑦ ✲ Bu cu ¯x ❩ ❩ ❩ Xt (c = cu) Bd cd ¯x ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ Ad ✡ ✡ Xt hits cdx and decreases to cddx ✡ (bad shock) ✡ ✡ with cdd < cd. ✡✡✢ Add cdx ✛✲ Xt (c = cd) Bdd Adu Xt hits cd ¯x and ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ increases to cdu ¯x ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ (good shock) ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ with cdu > cd ❏❏❫ ❏❏❫ ❏❏❫ ❏❏❫ Bdu Au ✛ cux ✄ ✄ Xt hits cux and ✄ decreases to cudx ✄ (bad shock) with cud < cd ✄ ✄✎ Aud ❩ ❩ Xt hits cu ¯x and increases to cuu ¯x (good shock) with cuu > cu ❩ ❩ ❩❩⑦ Buu Bud Auu ✛✲cddx Xt cdd ¯x (c = cdd) cdux ✛ ✲ cdu ¯x Xt (c = cdu) cudx ✛ ✲ cud ¯x cuux ✛ ✲ cuu ¯x Xt (c = cud) Xt (c = cuu) Figure 3: A discrete example of wealth and consumption. The optimal consumption policy looks like a (s, S) policy over wealth. Note that the two threshold levels x and ¯x depend on the market parameter values and (α, β). Equation (23) implies that for a given consumption c at a certain point of time, the thresholds are 14 cx and c¯x. Once the agent's wealth reaches either one of two thresholds of wealth, the new consumption level c′ is determined by (21). Then, the two new thresholds levels are set as c′x and c′ ¯x. Figure 3 describes a discrete-time version of the wealth and consumption movement. Assume that current wealth is X0 and consumption is c0. Initially the wealth process lies in interval (A, B). Suppose Xt hits c0 ¯x (point B) after several good shocks. Then, a new consumption level is set as cu and the new (s, S) band is interval (Au, Bu). At this instant, the wealth level is at point Bu. If a positive shock arrives again at point Bu, a new consumption level is immediately set as cuu and the new (s, S) band is interval (Auu, Buu). If a negative shock arrives at point Bu, however, Xt moves inside (Au, Bu) and the consumption level stays at cu until Xt hits either cux (point Au) or cu ¯x (point Bu). On the contrary, let us go back to the time when the wealth process lies in interval (A, B). Suppose Xt hits c0x (point A) after several bad shocks. Then, a new consumption level is set as cd and the new (s, S) band is interval (Ad, Bd). At this instant, the wealth level is at point Ad. If a negative shock arrives again at point Ad, a new consumption level is immediately set as cdd and the new (s, S) band is interval (Add, Bdd). If a positive shock arrives at at point Ad, however, Xt moves inside (Ad, Bd) and the consumption level stays at cu until Xt hits either cdx (point Ad) or cd ¯x (point Bd). 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (a) X ∗ t (b) c∗ t (c) π∗ t Figure 4: Simulation of optimal consumption, wealth and portfolio with α = 5, β = 10. The other parameter values are as follows: ρ = 0.02, µ = 0.085, r = 0.015, σ = 0.25, γ = 2, X0 = 50, C0 = 1 and T = 80. Now let us turn to the optimal risky investment, which is given in Proposition 3.3 below. The explicit form of the optimal portfolio in is easily obtained by applying Ito's lemma to the optimal wealth process in (22) and drawing out the corresponding term. Figure 4 shows a simulated path of X ∗ t and plots its corresponding consumption and risky portfolio. Notice from the figure that the number of portfolio rebalances is far more than the number of consumption adjustment over time. In other words, the household keeps rebalancing risky stock holdings within the (s, S) band while consumption is adjusted only at the boundary. 15 Proposition 3.3. Let c∗ c. The optimal portfolio π∗ t is given by s = c be the optimal consumption level at time s for some constant π∗ t = θ σ c D1m1(m1 − 1) (1 − γ + γm1)bα (cid:18) y∗ c−γbα(cid:19)m1−1 t + D2m2(m2 − 1) (1 − γ + γm2)bα (cid:18) y∗ c−γbα(cid:19)m2−1! (24) t for t ≥ s before the next consumption adjustment happens. Proof. The proof is given in Appendix E. Based on the classical portfolio selection results, we can easily see that the optimal risky portfolio in Equation (24) in Proposition 3.3 (a) will be decomposed as follows: π∗ t = µ − r γσ2 X ∗ t −(cid:18) µ − r γσ2 X ∗ t − π∗ t(cid:19) or π∗ t X ∗ t = µ − r γσ2 −(cid:18) µ − r γσ2 − π∗ t X ∗ t (cid:19) . (25) The first term is a myopic term and the remaining term is a hedging term. Note the minus sign in front of the second term. Intuitively, the second term in (25) is the demand that crows out the myopic demand, in order to maintain the current consumption level since frequent changes of the consumption level incur high utility cost. In this sense, the second term itself is positive. As seen in Panel (b) of Figure 5, the risky share is U-shaped and the ratio of the hedging demand takes the largest value at the certain point inside the (s, S) band at which the total risky share takes the minimum value, which generates interesting implications. We will discuss the implications of the U-shaped risky share over time in Section 4 (e). 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (a) saving & portfolio 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (b) saving wealth & portolio wealth 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (c) RCRRA Figure 5: Parameter value are as follows : δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.25, γ = 2, X = 50, c = 1, α = 5, β = 100. In this case, x = 23.93 and ¯x = 72.82. In particular, X = 42.70 in panel (c). The maximum RCRRA value is 4.1712. While decomposition (25) is intuitive, putting (24) into (25) is complicated and thus it is not much informative. In order to better understand risky investment pattern, we define the revealed coefficient of relative risk aversion (RCRRA) as follows: RCRRA(t) ≡ µ − r σ2 X ∗ t π∗ t . (26) The RCRRA is the level of relative risk aversion inferred from the agent's portfolio allo- cation at time t by outsiders who does not know the agent's actual risk aversion. If the 16 agent is unconstrained (α = β = 0, i.e., the Merton case), the RCRRA is always the same as the agent's true relative risk aversion γ. However, in general RCRRA is time-varying. In fact, it has maximum and minimum values as shown in Theorem 3.3. The next the- orem provides the properties of RCRRA and confirms the above intuition regarding the hedging demand. Theorem 3.3. (a) RCRRA(t) ≥ γ for all t ≥ 0. (b) Pick any s ≥ 0. Consider the wealth process X ∗ t ∈ (cx, c¯x) for t ≥ s, where c∗ s = c is the optimal consumption level at time s for some constant c. Then, RCRRA(t) t approaches either cx or c¯x. Moreover, there exist X ∈ (cx, c¯x) approaches γ as X ∗ such that RCRRA attains the maximum at Xt = X. RCRRA decreases in wealth for X ∗ t ∈ (cx, X) and increases in wealth for X ∗ t ∈ ( X, c¯x). Proof. The proof is given in Appendix F. Panle (c) of Figure 5 plots a typical RCRRA as a function of wealth. RCRRA is hump-shaped, which is opposite to the U-shaped risky share in Panel (b). It attains the minimum value γ at the two ends of interval [cx, c¯x] and the maximum value at X ∈ (cx, c¯x). As described in Theorem 3.3(b), RCRRA increases in wealth when the wealth level is smaller than X and it decreases in wealth when the wealth level is greater than X. 4 Risk Attitude and Risky Share This section investigate the properties of the optimal risky investment policy obtained in Section 3.3 in detail. 4.1 The consumption partial irreversibility model can explain the puzzle why the risky share of households is low A puzzle in the classical dynamic portfolio selection literature is that while households usually hold 6 − 20% in equity (conditional on participation, up to 40%), standard models predicts much higher values. For example, see the first row of Table 1 that is the Merton case with CRRA preference with about 7% risk premium and 25% volatility. The risky share is fairly high such as 124% and 75% when γ = 0.9 and 1.5, respectively, while these values fall into the reasonable range of risk aversion estimated by the recent literature (see the first paragraph of Section 4.2). The optimal risky share in our case is not constant, but is U-shaped (or V-shaped) (see Panel (b) in Figure 5 or Panels (b) and (d) in Figure 6). The maximum value of the ratio of risky asset holdings is the same as that of the Merton case only when the wealth process hits the (s, S) boundary. But, it is a measure zero event in a sample path. In most of times, the risky share is strictly smaller as seen in Figure 5(b). As we will discuss 17 γ = 0.9 γ = 1.5 γ = 3.5 (α, β) = (0, 0) 124% 75% 32% γ = 6 19% γ = 10 11% (α, β) = (5, 10) 100% -- 124% 55% -- 75% 24% -- 32% 11% -- 19% 9% -- 11% (α, β) = (25, 100) 48% -- 124% 27% -- 75% 14% -- 32% 9% -- 19% 6% -- 11% (α, β) = (49, 100) 15% -- 124% 9% -- 75% 6% -- 32% 4% -- 19% 2% -- 11% Table 1: The risky share for different values of (α, β)′s: the first row corresponds to the standard Merton case. The other parameters values are δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, and σ = 0.25. in Section 4.4, the ratio of risky asset holdings tends to be close to the minimum levels in times when there are moderate shocks and the wealth fluctuation is also moderate (equivalently, the RCRRA tends to be high for those times). For example, a household with γ = 1.5 and (α, β) = (49, 100) may keep the risky share close to 9% for a long time if only moderate good and bad shocks alternates in the market for the same period time. The ratio gradually increases as the wealth process gradually increases since the equity premium is positive. However, as mentioned before, 75% ratio happens fairly infrequently and the ratio should be much lower than 75% for most of times. This means that the utility cost model can generate the household portfolio holdings consistent with the data from a plausible level of risk aversion (on which will be discussed in Section 4.2 below). 4.2 Time-varying risk attitude in our model can reconcile the gap among the risk aversion parameter values widely used in different literature There is a vast literature on measuring risk aversion. The most widely accepted values are between 0.7 and 2. More recent literature tends to argue that risk aversion is close to 1 or even less than 1 (For example, see Chetty (2006), Layard, Mayraz, and Nickel (2008), Bombardini and Trebbi (2012), and Gandelman and Hernndez-Murillo (2015)). Actual Risk aversion γ = 0.9 γ = 1.05 γ = 1.15 γ = 1.3 γ = 1.5 (α, β) (α, β) (α, β) (40,10000) (40,6000) (40,4500) (40,3200) (40, 2200) (45,5000) (45,3000) (45,2200) (45,1500) (45, 1100) (49,1000) (49,500) (49,400) (49,260) (49, 180) Table 2: Actual risk aversion and the calibrated (α, β)′s to generate RCRRA with maximum 13: The other parameters values are δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.25, X = 50, and c = 1. However, most of asset pricing literature takes the level of risk aversion as about 10 or higher for the calibration analysis (e.g., Bansal et al. (2012), and Cocco et al. (2005)). If 18 we consider the investment aspect of these asset pricing models, it is related to the point made in Section 4.1 in the sense that γ = 10 results in the risky share consistent with the empirical observation for households' stock holdings (see the column for γ = 10 when (α, β) = (0, 0) in Table 1). In summary, the estimated results directly tell that risk aversion is small around unity while the calibration exercise in asset pricing indicates that the plausible level of risk aversion should be much higher. Our model can reconcile the gap in these two lines of literature. Table 2 shows our numerical exercises. It calibrates (α, β) values that generate 13 as the maximum RCRRA for each risk aversion around unity with other widely accepted market parameter values given in the table. Note that the conventional habit model can also generate time-varying risk aversion. However, it requires to define a internal or external habit stock process, which are usually ad hoc. Our model can perform a precise calibration analysis that can fit the maximum and minimum values of risk aversion. 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 20 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 =10 =15 =20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (b) α = 5 =50 =100 =150 20 40 60 80 100 120 =10 =15 =20 30 40 50 60 70 80 (a) α = 5 =50 =100 =150 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 20 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 (c) α = 49 (d) α = 49 Figure 6: Panels (a) and (c) plot RCRRA curves for shares for different α and β values. Panels (b) and (d) plot the corresponding risky share, respectively. Other parameter values are as follows: δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.25, c = 1 and γ = 1.5. 19 (α, β) σ = 0.25 σ = 0.3 σ = 0.35 σ = 0.4 (5, 10) (5, 100) (29, 100) (49, 100) (49, 1000) 1.116 1.782 2.502 7.459 13.18 1.164 1.974 2.866 9.607 18.48 1.208 2.164 3.250 12.40 26.20 1.249 2.358 3.668 16.07 37.46 Table 3: The maximum values of RCRRA. The other parameters values are δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, γ = 0.9, X = 50, and c = 1. 4.3 RCRRA can be very large while actual risk aversion is small In Figure 5(c), the actual risk aversion is γ = 3 and the maximum value of RCRRA is about 5.32. This difference does not seem large. However, the difference between the actual level of risk aversion and the RCRRA value can be dramatically large. Figures 7 and 8 plot a sample path of RCRRA(t). While the actual risk aversion level is γ = 0.9 in these figures, RCRRA can take more than 38. The optimal wealth path touches neither cx nor c¯x (See the left panel in each figure), which means that the consumption path stays constant in Figures 7 and 8. The maximum value of RCRRA increases in α and β, respectively7 (see Table 3). A high α or β implies a high cost when the agent changes the consumption level. Therefore, the intertemporal hedging deman become large (with negative sign) to crow out the myopic demand (see Eq. (25) and explanation below the equation), which makes the RCRRA level higher. In addition, a high risk, i.e., a high volatility σ increase the maximum level of RCRRA by the same token. 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 20 40 60 80 0 0 20 40 60 80 Figure 7: RCRRA can be very large while the actual risk aversion is very low (γ = 0.9). Consumption stays constant in this sample path. Parameter values are as follows: δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.4, T = 80, X = 64.38, c = 1, α = 49, β = 1000. The maximum RCRRA value is 37.46. 7Note that β is more important since α cannot exceed 1 δ because of Assumption 2. 20 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 20 40 60 80 0 0 20 40 60 80 Figure 8: RCRRA can be very large while the actual risk aversion is very low (γ = 0.9). Consumption stays constant in this sample path. Parameter values are as follows: δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.4, T = 80, X = 64.38, c = 1, α = 49, β = 1000. The maximum RCRRA value is 37.46. 4.4 RCRRA tends to be large during the times when moderate shocks continuously arrive. RCRRA becomes small for the times with large shocks. We know that RCRRA can be very large while the given risk aversion is very small. Then, when does it happen? In habit models, it happens in the downturns, in particular, when the current consumption level is very close to the habit stock. The mechanism to induce the difference between the actual risk aversion and the RCRRA in our model is very different from that of habit models. Notice in our model that RCRRA tends to be small during the times when there are consecutive large shocks and thus in these times there are high fluctuations in wealth. For example, those times are between t = 45 and t = 60 in Figure 7 and between t = 20 and t = 50 in Figure 8. On the other hand, it tends to be high during the time when there are little or modest fluctuations in wealth due to moderately alternating good and bad shocks. For example, those times are before t = 45 in Figure 7 and after t = 50 in Figure 8. There are other examples in the Appendix. In other words, high cost for consumption adjustment amplifies risk aversion over small or moderate shocks (particularly during the times when the wealth level stays in the mid range of (s, S) band), making the household look very conservative. However, the household may look very aggressive (if her actual risk aversion is very low), showing RCRRA close to her actual risk aversion, during the time when there are large shocks. Notably, if the household has a long sequence of moderate good shocks, then the risk aversion gradually decreases (equivalently the household gradually increases risky asset holdings). This pattern looks like that the household gains more confidence due to the success in the stock market. In this sense, our utility cost model can generate substantial risk aversion in times of moderate risk events and great risk-taking in times of large risk events. This result is 21 quite consistent with the puzzle reported in the behavioral literature. 4.5 Change in risky share relative to change in wealth 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 (a) bull market (b) intermediate (c) bear market (d) highly fluctuating Figure 9: Four different cases of stock price evolution: Parameter value are as follows : δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, σ = 0.25, γ = 1.5 and c = 1. Here we investigate how the risky share changes relative to an increase in wealth. Note that models with habit, commitment, or DRRA (decreasing relative risk aversion) often predict that the relationship is positive while standard models with CRRA preference predicts no relationship. The empirical literature, however, seems rather inconclusive. For example, Calvet et al. (2009) and Calvet and Sodini (2014) favor the habit or commitment or DRRA models, and Chiappori and Paiella (2011) and Brunnermeier and Nagel (2008) favor the classical CRRA model and show even slightly negative relationship. We shed on light on the debate in the literature. We argue that whether the change in wealth has positive, negative, or no impact on the risky share depends on what kind of a sample path (time-series of the stock market data) researchers use although the data generating process is fixed. Figure 9 shows the four types of sample paths we consider. Panel (a) is a typical long-term bull market, , Panel (b) is intermediate, Panel (c) is a typical bear market, and Panel (d) is the highly-fluctuating market over time. We will show that the impact of an wealth change on the risky share is different for each sample path. To do so, we generate the population with random (α, β)′s and simulate their wealth and risky share over time. Basically our estimation analysis follows that of Brunnermeier and Nagel (2008). Con- sider the following equation ∆k log πt Xt = ρ∆k log Xt, (27) where ∆k denotes a k-period(year) first-difference operator, ∆kyt ≡ yt − yt−k. Below we briefly explain how we regress Eq. (27). (Step 1) Generate initial consumption/wealth distributions of N individuals. • We divide the interval [0, T ] into 12×T subintervals with end points tj = 1, 2, ..., 12× T . (Here, we assume that T is a positive integer) 22 • We set equal initial consumption, c0 = 1 for each individual and generate each individual's initial consumption x0 randomly according to a uniform distribution over (cx, c¯x). • For each i, i = 1, 2, ...N and given pairs (mα, vα), (mβ, vβ), we generate log-normally distributed random variables αi and βi whose the mean and variance are (mα, vα) and (mβ, vβ), respectively.8 • Generate a 12 × T random vector ω that follows a standard normal distribution. Using this vector ω, we generate the process of the risky asset returns ∆St/St, and the dual process y∗ t in Proposition 3.2 for all the N individuals. By Proposition 3.2, we can simulate the optimal wealth and portfolio processes of N individuals. (Step 2) Compute changes in the ratio of risk asset holdings and changes in wealth. • Let (X 1, P 1), (X 2, P 2), ..., (X N , P N ) be the simulated wealth/portfolio processes for N individuals in our utility cost model obtained in (Step 1). (Note that X i and P i are (12 × T + 1) random vectors for i = 1, 2, ..., N ). • For given T and k, there are (T − k + 1) numbers of ∆k. For i = 1, 2, ..., N and j = 1, 2, ..., (T − k + 1) j+k P i X i P i(12 × (j + k − 1) + 1) X i(12 × (j + k − 1) + 1) − log P i(12 × (j − 1) + 1) X i(12 × (j − 1) + 1) , DR(i, j) = ∆k log = log X(i, j) = ∆k log X i j+k j+k = log X i(12 × (j + k − 1) + 1) − log X i(12 × (j − 1) + 1). • We regress Eq. (27) with OLS using the simulate results DR and X. (mα, vα) (mβ, vβ) bull markets intermediate bear markets highly fluctuating (5, 52) (10, 52) (10, 52) (15, 102) (15, 102) (50, 202) (100, 202) (150, 502) (150, 502) (200, 502) 0.1369∗∗∗ 0.0999∗∗∗ 0.1107∗∗∗ 0.1118∗∗∗ 0.0961∗∗∗ 0.0208 (0.22) 0.0829∗∗∗ 0.1261∗∗∗ 0.1229∗∗∗ 0.1710∗∗∗ −0.0757∗∗∗ −0.0746∗∗∗ −0.0679∗∗∗ −0.0699∗∗∗ -0.0478 (0.01) -0.0271 (0.26) -0.0387 (0.04) -0.0341 (0.17) -0.0164 (0.43) -0.0379 (0.14) N = 1500, T = 5, k = 2. Table 4: The regression coefficients for markets (a), (b), (c), and (d) in Figure 9: We generate the distribution of households with α and β using the log-normal distributions with mean mα, mβ and variance vα, vβ respectively. The values in the parentheses are p-values when the p-value is greater than 1%. ∗ ∗ ∗ means the p-value smaller than 1%. The other parameters values are δ = 0.02, r = 0.015, µ = 0.085, γ = 1.5, and c = 1. The results are summarized in Table 4. The regression results show the positive impact of the wealth increase on the risky share when the market is generally going up (Panel 8The log-normal distribution implies that there are households having fairly large values of α's although their density in the population is very small. We drop those household whose α values violates Assumption 2. 23 (a)) or intermediate with moderate up-and-downs. There is no wealth impact on the risky share or slightly negative (if any) when the market is generally going down (Panel (c)) or has a huge volatility (Panel (d)). The intuition behind these results originates from the decreasing region increasing region Figure 10: The decreasing region and increasing region of the risky share in the (s, S) band. ratio of risky asset holding dynamics and wealth process. The risky share is hump-shaped in each (s, S) band, which implies that there are two regions with the band: the one is the decreasing region in which the risky share decreases with wealth and the other is the increasing region in which the risky share increases with wealth (see Figure 10). The decreasing region is in the left part of the (s, S) band and the increasing region is in the right part of the (s, S) band. In general, the increasing region longer than the decreasing region since the risk premium is positive. In addition, recall Figure 3 and its description below Theorem 3.2. In Figure 3, if there are consecutive good shocks, the wealth process tends to move in the following way: X0 → B → Bu → Buu. During the times of this journey, the wealth process will stay longer in the increasing region of each (s, S) band since there are more good shocks than bad shocks in size and amount. On the other hand, if there are consecutive bad shocks, the wealth process tends to move in the other way: X0 → A → Ad → Add. During the times of this journey, the wealth process will stay longer in the decreasing region of each (s, S) band since there are more bad shocks than good shocks. Having the above property in mind, if the market is doing well in the long-run as in Panel (a) of Figure 9), over time the wealth process is more likely to stay in the increasing region of each (s, S) band. Thus, the risky share tends to increase with wealth during these times. On the other hand, if the market is doing poorly for a while as in Panel (c) of Figure 9), the wealth process is more likely to stay in the decreasing region of each (s, S) interval. Thus, the risky share decreases with wealth during these times. The intermediate case (Panel (b) of Figure 3) tends to be closer to the case of the bull 24 market and the highly fluctuating period (Panel (d)) of 3) tends to be closer to the case of the bear market. It is because, as mentioned above, the right half part of the (s, S) band (increasing region) is generally longer than left half part of the (s, S) band (decreasing region). 5 Consumption and Asset Pricing Moments Here we provide two implications of optimal consumption. Our model can explain the excess sensitivity and excess smoothness puzzles. In addition, our model can generate the reasonable asset pricing moments such as auto-correlation coefficient of consumption, which is often pointed out as a weakness of habit models. 5.1 Excess Sensitivity and Excess Smoothness The optimal consumption level is infrequently adjusted in our model (see, for example, Figures 4 and 5). The excess smoothness appears since consumption in our model does not immediately respond to a permanent shock with a moderate level when the wealth level after the shock does not reach the (s, S) boundary. In other words, the household is less likely to change a consumption level with response to a small unexpected permanent shock (income), while they do increase or decrease the ratio of risky asset holdings for a positive (negative) shock. The excess sensitivity also arises in our model by a similar reason. After a moderate good shock, the wealth level becomes higher than before. Although consumption does not immediately respond, it is more likely to increase later since the probability of increasing consumption in the next period becomes higher after the good shock. Therefore, our model can explain the excess sensitivity puzzle. However, all the above arguments do not really work if the size of shock is large enough. For a large good shock, the wealth level immediately reaches the upper threshold, which makes consumption increase immediately. By the same token, the consumption level decreases immediately after a large bad shock. So, the consumption moves in the large shock events, following the permanent income hypothesis. 5.2 Auto-correlation Here we provide how the model can generate consumption data and try to match several asset pricing moments. By using the time series of aggregate consumption we compute the mean and standard deviation of consumption growth rates, the intertemporal marginal rate of substitution(IMRS) and the theoretical equity premium(EP). Based on our con- sumption model, we simulate optimal consumption processes for N = 100 individuals following three steps: (Step 1) Generate initial consumption/wealth distributions of N individuals. 25 E[∆c] σ(∆c) EP Std of IMRS AC1(∆c) Data 0.0192 0.0212 -- -- Our Model 0.0181 0.0236 0.0052 0.0775 0.4600 0.4900 Merton with temporal aggregation 0.0200 0.0858 0.0526 0.2996 0.1677 Table 5: Mean, standard deviation, autocorrelation of the consumption growth rate, theoret- ical equity premium, and standard deviation of the IMRS. The parameter values as follows: δ = 0.015, r = 0.0086, µ = 0.0784, σ = 0.2016, γ = 3.5, and α = 5, β = 10. The data in the first row is from Bansal et al. (2012), sampled on an annual frequency with the period from 1930 to 2008. • We divide the interval [0, 79] into 2 × 12 × 79 subintervals with end points tj = 1, .., 2 × 12 × 79. • Similar to Marshall and Parekh (1999), we set equal initial consumption, c0 = 1 for each individual and generate each individual's initial consumption x0 randomly according to a uniform distribution over (cx, c¯x). • Generate a 2 × 12 × 79 random vector ω that follows a standard normal distribution. Using this vector ω, we generate the process of the risky asset returns ∆St/St, and the dual process y∗ t in Proposition 3.2 for all the N individuals. By Proposition 3.2, we can simulate the optimal consumption processes of N individuals. (Step 2) Aggregation of Consumption • Let C1, C2, ..., C N be the simulated consumption processes for N individuals in our utility cost model obtained in (Step 1). • (Cross sectional aggregation) The cross sectionally aggregated consumption process CA of C1, C2, ..., C N is defined as follows: For j = 1, 2, ..., 2 × 12 × 79, CA(tj ) = 1 N N Xi=1 ci(tj). • (Temporal aggregation) We temporally aggregate the cross sectionally aggregated series CA to create monthly CA∗ (that is, ∆t = 1/12) as follows: For j = 1, 2, ..., 12 × 79, CA∗(i) = 2 Xj=1 CA(t2×(i−1)+j ). (Step 3) Compute the consumption growth rate, IMRS, and theoretical EP of aggregated consumption CA∗ 26 E[∆c] σ(∆c) EP Std of IMRS AC1(∆c) β 10 15 20 δ γ α 0.015 3.5 0.015 3.5 0.015 3.5 5 0 5 10 30 50 50 0.0181 0.0236 0.0052 0.0182 0.0232 0.0050 0.0183 0.0229 0.0049 0.0182 0.0233 0.0050 20 0.0183 0.0229 0.0049 0.0184 0.0226 0.0048 100 100 0.0191 0.0217 0.0044 0.0192 0.0215 0.0044 1000 0.0192 0.0215 0.0044 0.010 0.0194 0.0242 0.0054 0.015 3.5 5 10 0.0181 0.0236 0.0052 0.050 0.015 0.9 1.5 3.5 10 5 10 0.0093 0.0204 0.0039 0.0738 0.0963 0.0052 0.0431 0.0563 0.0052 0.0181 0.0236 0.0052 0.0063 0.0082 0.0052 0.0775 0.0758 0.0747 0.0762 0.0747 0.0736 0.0699 0.0693 0.0691 0.0791 0.0775 0.0683 0.0775 0.0775 0.0775 0.0775 0.4900 0.4888 0.4881 0.4889 0.4881 0.4869 0.4825 0.4808 0.4802 0.4888 0.4900 0.4953 0.4889 0.4898 0.4900 0.4900 Table 6: Mean, standard deviation, autocorrelation of the consumption growth rate, theoret- ical equity premium, and standard deviation of the IMRS. The parameter values as follows: r = 0.0086, µ = 0.0784 and σ = 0.2016. • We use the simulated returns on the risky asset r(tj ) = 1, 2, ..., 12 × 79. • We derive the following time-series i = 1, 2, ..., 12 × 79 − 1, (Consumption growth rate) CG(i) = CA∗(i + 1) − CA∗(i) CA∗(i) . (IMRS) I(i) = e−δ∆t(cid:18) CA∗(i + 1) CA∗(i) (cid:19)−γ . (EP) EP (i) = − cov(cid:0)e−δ∆t(CA∗(i + 1)/CA∗(i))−γ, (r(i + 1)/r(i))(cid:1) E[e−δ∆t(CA∗(i + 1)/CA∗(i))−γ] . Using these time-series, we obtain desired statistics(the mean and the standard derivation of consumption growth, the IMRS, the theoretical EP and the auto- correlation of aggregated consumption CA∗). Since each time-series depends on the random vector ω, repeat (Step 1) -- (Step 3) 1000 times. The baseline results are summarized in Table 5. The model fits the consumption 27 data well with reasonable values for the market and preference parameters. In particular, the auto-correlation simulated by our model is well matched with the data, which is not possible with the standard Merton case. It is surprising that a fairly small values of (α, β) can generate the autocorrelation value close to its historical data. Table 6 confirms this result. 6 Concluding Remarks We model the partial irreversibility of consumption decision motivated by Duesenberry (1949). In order to do so, we introduce the adjustment cost of consumption. We show that the consumption partial irreversibility model can generate a number of novel implications. Some of our results are similar to those derived from habit formation or consumption commitment models. However, the mechanism to generate time-varying risk aversion or the excess sensitivity and excess smoothness consumption is very different from that from these literature. In this sense, we view that our model as complement to the existing literature. In addition to these results, we find that the consumption adjustment cost can reconcile the gap between the asset pricing literature and the literature on estimating risk aversion. Also, we shed light on the debate on how the wealth change has impact on the households risky share. We believe that the (partial) irreversibility is a very realistic and important aspect of consumption decision. While we model it by introducing the adjustment cost, we admit that there would be other ways to model it. We hope that our model contributes to building other works toward this direction. One of important future works will be building a general equilibrium model with the partial irreversibility of consumption decision that can investigate further asset pricing implications (e.g., Choi et al. (2018)). This type of extension will help to provide the microfoundation for the relative income hypothesis by Duesenberry (1949). References Abel, A. B., 1990, Asset Prices under Habit Formation and Catching up with the Joneses, American Economic Review, 80(2), 38 -- 42. Bansal, R., Kiku, D., Yaron, A., 2012, An empirical evaluation of the longrun risks model for asset prices, Critical Finance Review, 1, 183 -- 221. Bombardini, M., Trebbi, F. , 2012, Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: An Ex- periment with Large and Small Stakes, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2012, 10(6), 1348 -- 99. Brunnermeier, M., Nagel, S., 2008, Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk 28 aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals asset allocation, American Economic Review 98, 713 -- 736. Calvet, L. E., Sodini, P., 2014, Twin Picks: Disentangling the Determinants of Risk- Taking in Household Portfolios, Journal of Finance, 69(2), 867 -- 906 Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., Sodini, P., 2009, Fight or flight? Portfolio rebalancing by individual investors, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 301 -- 348. Campbell, J. Y., Cochrane, J. H., 1999, By force of habit: a consumption-based explana- tion of aggregate stock market behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 107, 205 -- 251. Campo, S., Guerre, E., Perrigne, I., Quang, V., 2011, Semiparametric Estimation of First- Price Auctions with Risk-Averse Bidders, Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 112 -- 47. Chetty, R., 2006, A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion, American Economic Re- view, 96(5), 1821 -- 34. Chetty, R., Szeidl, A., 2007, Consumption Commitments and Risk Preferences, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (2), 831877. Chetty, R., Szeidl, A., 2016,Consumption Commitments and and Habit Formation, Econo- metrica, 84(2), 855 -- 890. Chiappori, P., Paiella, M., 2011, Relative Risk Aversion is Constant: Evidence From Panel Data, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(6), 1021 -- 2052. Choi, K. J., Jeon, J., Koo, H.K., 2018, Duesenberry's Theory of Consumption: An Equi- librium Model of (Partial) Consumption Irreversibility, working paper Cocco, J.F., Gomes, F.J, Maenhout, P.J., 2005, Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life Cycle, Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), 491-533. Constantinides, G. M., 1990, Habit Formation: A Resolution of the Equity Premium Puzzle, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 519 -- 543. Cox, J., Huang, C., 1989, Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Polices when Asset Prices Follow a Diffusion Process, Journal of Economic Theory, 49(1), 33 -- 83. Dai, M., Yi, F., 2009, Finite-horizon optimal investment with transaction costs: A parabolic double obstacle problem, Journal of Differential Equations, 246(4), 1445- 1469. Davis, M.H.A., Norman A.R., 1990, Portfolio selection with transaction costs, Mathemat- ics of Operations Research 15, 676 -- 713. 29 Deaton, A., 1987, Life-Cycle Models of Consumption: Is the Evidence Consistent With the Theory, Advances in Econometrics, Fifth World Congress, Vol. 2, ed. by B. Truman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Duesenberry, J. S., 1949, 'Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cam- bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Dybvig, P. H., 1995, Dusenberry's Racheting of Consumption: Optimal Dynamic Con- sumption and InvestmentGiven Intolerance for any Decline in Standard of Living, Re- view of Economic Studies, 62(2), 287 -- 313. Flavin, M., 1981, The Adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations About Future Income, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 974 -- 1009 Flavin, M., Nakagawa, S., 2008, A Model of Housing in the Presence of Adjustment Costs: A Structural Interpretation of Habit Persistence, American Economic Review, 98, 474 -- 495. Fleming, W.H., Soner, H.M., 2006, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, (Springer-Verlag), New York. Gali, J. (1994), Keeping up with the Joneses: Consumption Externalities, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Prices, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 26, 1 -- 8. Gandelman, N, Hernndez-Murillo, R., 2013, What Do Happiness and Health Satisfaction Data Tell Us About Relative Risk Aversion? Journal of Economic Psychology 39, 301 -- 12. Gandelman, N., Hernndez-Murillo, R., 2015 Risk Aversion at the Country Level, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 97(1), 53 -- 66. Grossman, S. J., Laroque, G., 1990, Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods, Econometrica, 58, 25 -- 51. Hansen, L P., Singleton, K., Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models, Econometrica, 50(5), 1269 -- 86. Harrison, M., 1985, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems, Wiley, New York. Hindy, A. and C. Huang "Intertemporal Preferences for Uncertain Consumption: A Con- tinuous Time Approach," Econometrica 60(4), 781-801. Hindy, A. and C. Huang "Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Rules with Durability and Local Substitution," Econometrica 61(1), 85-121. Hindy, A. C. Huang, and S. Zhu "Optimal consumption and portfolio rules with durability and habit formation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21(2-3), 525-550. 30 Jappelli, T., Pistaferri, L., 2010, The Consumption Response to Income Changes, Annual Review of Economics, 2, 479-506. Jeon, J., Koo, H. K., Shin, Y. H., 2018, Portfolio selection with consumption ratcheting, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 92, 153 -- 182. Kandel, S., Stambaugh, R., 1991, Asset Returns, Investment Horizons and Intertemporal Preferences, Journal of Monetary Economics 27, 39-71 Karatzas, I., Lehoczky, J., Shreve, S.E., 1987, "Optimal Portfolio and Consumption De- cisions for a "Small Investor" on a Finite Horizon," SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 25(6), 1557-1586. Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E., 1998. Methods of Mathematical Finance, Springer-Verlag, New York. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., Nickell, S., 2008, The Marginal Utility of Income., Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1846-57. Lieberman, G., 1996, Second Order Parabolic Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore. Marshall, D., Parekh, N., 1999, Can costs of consumption adjustment explain asset pricing puzzles, Journal of Finance, 54(2), 623-654. Oksendal, B., 2005, Stochastic Differential Equations, 6th ed. Springer. Otrok, C., Ravikumar, B., Whiteman, C., 2002, Habit formation: a resolution of the equity premium puzzle, Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 12611288. Szpiro, G., 2002, "An Isomorphism Between Asset Pricing Models With and Without Linear Habit Formation" Review of Financial Studies, 15(4), 1189-1221. Szpiro, G., 1986, "Relative Risk Aversion Around the World." Economics Letters, 20(1), 19 -- 21. 31 Appendix A Derivation of the dual value function J(y, c) In this section, we will derive a solution to Problem 3 by solving the HJB equation (16). The following theorem guarantees that the solution to the HJB equation (16) is the solution to the dual problem. Theorem A.1 (Verification Theorem). 1. Suppose that the HJB equation (16) has a twice continuously differentiable solution J(y, c) : R → R satisfying the following conditions: (1) For any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), the process defined by Z t 0 e−δs(−θ)ysJy(ys, cs)dBs, t ≥ 0, is a martingale. (2) For any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), lim inf t→∞ E[e−δtJ(yt, ct)] ≥ 0. Then, for initial condition (y0, c0) ∈ R and any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), J(y0, c0) ≥ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)h(yt, ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) . 2. Given any initial condition (y, c) ∈ R, suppose that there exist an admissible consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) such that, if c∗ is the associated consumption process, then (yt, c∗ t ) ∈ {(y, c) ∈ R : LJ(y, c) + h(y, c) = 0} , Lebesgue-a.e., P-a.s., 0 Z t Z t 0 and e−δs(cid:0)Jc(ys, c∗ e−δs(cid:0)−Jc(ys, c∗ lim t→∞ Ehe−δtJ(yt, c∗ s )(cid:1) dc∗,+ s)(cid:1) dc∗,− t )i = 0 s) − αu′(c∗ s = 0, s ) − βu′(c∗ s = 0, for all t ≥ 0, P − a.s., for all t ≥ 0, P − a.s, (28) (Transversality condition). Then, J(y, c) is the dual value function for Problem 3 and (c∗,+, c∗,−) is the optimal consumption strategy. Proof. (Proof of 1.) For given consumption process {ct}∞ t=0, define a process M c t =Z t 0 e−δs(cid:0)(u(cs) − yscs)ds) − αu′(cs)dc+ By the generalized It´o's lemma (See Harrison (1985)), t − βu′(cs)dc− t (cid:1) + e−δtJ(yt, ct). t +(cid:16)e−δtdJ(yt, ct) − e−δtδJ(yt, ct)dt(cid:17) dM c t =e−δt(u(ct) − ytct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− =e−δt(cid:18) θ2 2 y2 t Jyy(yt, ct) + (δ − r)ytJy(yt, ct) − δJ(yt, ct) + u(ct) − ytct(cid:19) dt +e−δt(Jc(yt, ct) − αu′(ct))d(c+ +e−δt(J(yt, ct) − J(yt, ct−) − αu′(ct)∆ct)1{∆ct>0} +e−δt(J(yt, ct) − J(yt, ct−) + βu′(ct)∆ct)1{∆ct<0} − θe−δtytJy(yt, ct)dBt t )c + e−δt(−Jc(yt, ct) − βu′(ct))d(c− t )c (29) (30) 32 where (c+)c and (c−)c are the continuous parts of c+ and c−, respectively. Hence, for any fixed T > 0, M c T − M c t t t =Z T +Z T + Xt≤s≤T + Xt≤s≤T +Z T t t 2 y2 (A) {z s )c +Z T {z (B) (cid:0)−Jc(ys, cs) − βu′(cs)(cid:1) d(c− s Jyy(ys, cs) + (δ − r)ysJy(ys, cs) − δJ + u(cs) − yscs(cid:19) ds } e−δs(cid:18) θ2 (cid:0)Jc(ys, cs) − αu′(cs)(cid:1) d(c+ e−δs(cid:0)J(ys, cs) − J(ys, cs−) − αu′(cs)∆cs(cid:1) 1{∆cs>0} } e−δs(cid:0)J(ys, cs) − J(ys, cs−) + βu′(cs)∆cs(cid:1) 1{∆cs<0} } s )c (D) (C) (−θ)e−δsysJy(ys, cs)dBs } (31) {z {z } . (E) {z Since we deduce that Moreover, (C) = Xt≤s≤T (D) = Xt≤s≤T max{LJ + u(c) − yc, Jc(y, c) − αu′(c), −Jc(y, c) − βu′(c)} = 0, (A) ≤ 0 and (B) ≤ 0. e−δsZ cs e−δsZ ∆cs 0 cs−∆cs(cid:0)Jc(ys, cs) − αu′(c)(cid:1) dc · 1{∆cs>0} ≤ 0, (cid:0)−Jc(ys, cs − ∆cs + c) − βu′(c)(cid:1) dc · 1{∆cs<0} ≤ 0, and by assumption, E[(E)] = 0. Thus, we can conclude that and {M c t }t≥0 is a super-martingale. This implies that E[M c T ] ≤ J(y0, c0) and Et[M c T − M c t ] ≤ 0, J(y0, c0) ≥ E(cid:20)Z T 0 By assumption e−δs(cid:0)(u(cs) − yscs)ds) − αu′(cs)dc+ t − βu′(cs)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) + e−δT J(yT , cT ). and Fatou's lemma, we deduce that lim inf T →∞ E[e−δT J(yT , cT )] ≥ 0. J(y0, c0) ≥ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δs(cid:0)(u(cs) − yscs)ds) − αu′(cs)dc+ t − βu′(cs)dc− The relation (34) holds for any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), we obtain J(y0, c0) ≥ sup (c+,c−)∈Π(c) E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 (Proof of 2.) e−δt(cid:0)h(yt, ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) . t (cid:1)(cid:21) . 33 (32) (33) (34) By assumption, we can show that in (31) E[(A)] = E[(B)] = E[(C)] = E[(D)] = E[(E)] = 0 for the process M c∗ t . This implies that {M c∗ t }t≥0 is a martingale and J(y0, c0) = E(cid:20)Z T 0 e−δs(cid:0)(u(c∗) − ysc∗)ds − αu′(c∗)dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗)dc∗,− t (cid:1)(cid:21) + e−δT J(yT , cT ). (35) The transversality condition leads to J(y0, c0) = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 Thus, e−δs(cid:0)(u(c∗) − ysc∗)ds − αu′(c∗)dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗)dc∗,− t (cid:1)(cid:21) . (36) J(y0, c0) = sup (c+,c−)∈Π(c) E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δs(cid:0)(u(c) − ysc)ds − αu′(c)dc+ t − βu′(c)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) and the consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) attains the maximum. Hence (c∗,+, c∗,−) is the optimal. Now, we will obtain the analytic characterization of the dual value function by using the the variational inequality (16). As Dai and Yi (2009), we consider the double obstacle problem arising from variational in- equality (16) as follows: Lw(y, c) + u′(c) − y ≥ 0, Lw(y, c) + u′(c) − y ≤ 0, Lw(y, c) + u′(c) − y = 0, for w(y, c) = αu′(c), for w(y, c) = −βu′(c), for − βu′(c) < w(y, c) < αu′(c),  Consider the following substitution: w(y, c) = u′(c)H(z) and z = y u′(c) . Then, the double obstacle problem (37) can be changed by LH(z) + 1 − z ≥ 0, LH(z) + 1 − z ≤ 0, LH(z) + 1 − z = 0, for H(z) = α, for H(z) = −β, for − β < H(z) < α,  The following proposition provides the exact solution of the double obstacle problem (38). Proposition A.1. The variational inequality (38) has a unique C1-solution, which is (37) (38) H(z) = where α, D1(cid:18) z bα(cid:19)m1 −β, + D2(cid:18) z bα(cid:19)m2 + 1 δ − z r , for z ≤ bα, for bα < z < bβ, (39) for z ≥ bβ, D1 = (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r m2 − m1 , D2 = (α − 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bα r m1 − m2 , and m1,m2 are positive and negative roots of following quadratic equation: and bα, bβ are defined as θ2 2 m2 + (δ − r − θ2 2 )m − δ = 0. bα = (1 − δα) m1 − 1 m1 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 , bβ = (1 + δβ) m1 − 1 m1 wm1 − κ wm1 − w . 34 with κ = 1 − δα 1 + δβ . Here, w is the unique root to the equation f (w) = 0 in (0, 1), where f (w) = (m1 − 1)m2(1 − w1−m2 )(wm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(wm1 − w)(1 − κw−m2 ). (40) Also, H ′(bα) = H ′(bβ) = 0, H ′(z) < 0 for z ∈ (bα, bβ) and H ′(z) attains minimum at bm ∈ (bα, bβ) defined by bm = bα ·(cid:18) −D2m2(m2 − 1) D1m1(m1 − 1) (cid:19) 1 m1 −m2 . Proof. The uniqueness of the solution is guaranteed due to the maximum principle of the partial differential equation theory(see Lieberman (1996)). Now, we will prove the remain part of proposition in the following steps. (Step 1) We first consider the following free boundary problem: LH + 1 − z = 0, H(bα) = α, H(bβ) = −β, bα < z < bβ, H ′(bα) = 0, H ′(bβ) = 0. (41)  Then we can extend the solution H onto R+ by H(z) = α if z ∈ (0, bα) and H(z) = −β if z ∈ (bβ, ∞). (42) Next, we show that H(z) is the solution to variational inequality (38). We can let the general solution for (41) in the form of H(z) = D1(cid:18) z bα(cid:19)m1 + D2(cid:18) z bβ(cid:19)m2 + 1 δ − z r . From the smooth-pasting condition H(bα) = α and H ′(bα) = 0, H(bα) = D1 + D2 + bα r H ′(bα) = m1D1 + m2D2 − 1 δ − = α, 1 r = 0. Therefore, D1 and D2 are given by D1 = Similarly, (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r m2 − m1 , D2 = (α − 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bα r m1 − m2 (43) . (44) H(bβ) = D1(cid:18) bβ H ′(bβ) = m1D1 and D1 = −(β + 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) m2 − m1 From (44) and (46), (α − (α − 1 δ 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) )m1 + (m1 − 1) + bβ r + D2(cid:18) bβ bα(cid:19)m1 bα (cid:18) bβ bα(cid:19)m1−1 (cid:18) bα bβ(cid:19)m1 =(cid:18)−(β + =(cid:18)−(β + bα r bα r 35 − = −β, bβ r + 1 δ bα(cid:19)m2 bα (cid:18) bβ m2D2 bα(cid:19)m2−1 − 1 r = 0, (45) , D2 = −(β + 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bβ r m1 − m2 (cid:18) bα bβ(cid:19)m2 . (46) 1 δ 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) )m1 + (m1 − 1) bβ r (cid:19) ·(cid:18) bα r (cid:19) ·(cid:18) bα bβ(cid:19)m1 bβ(cid:19)m2 bβ , . (47) Let us define From (47), m2 m1 w = bα bβ . (α − 1 (α − 1 δ ) + (β + 1 δ ) + (β + 1 δ )wm1 δ )wm2 = m2 − 1 m1 − 1 wm1 − w wm2 − w . (48) From (48), we define f (w) as (18). (Step 2) f (w) has a unique solution w ∈ (0, 1) and w ∈ (0, κ). For w ∈ (κ, 1), f (w) =w−m2 ((m1 − 1)m2(wm2 − w)(wm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(wm1 − w)(wm2 − κ)) <w−m2 ((m1 − 1)m2(wm2 − w)(wm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(wm1 − κ)(wm2 − κ)) =w−m2 (wm1 − κ)(wm2 − κ)(m1 − m2) (49) <0. On the other hand, f (0) =(m1 − 1)m2(−κ) > 0, f (κ) =(m1 − 1)m2(1 − κ(1−m2))(κm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(κm1 − κ)(1 − κ1−m2 ) (50) =(m1 − m2)(1 − κ(1−m2 ))(κm1 − κ) < 0. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists w ∈ (0, κ) such that f (w) = 0. To show "uniqueness", it is suffice to show that f ′′(w) > 0, w ∈ (0, κ). Then, f (w) =w−m2 ((m1 − 1)m2(wm2 − w)(wm1 − κ) − m1(m2 − 1)(wm1 − w)(wm2 − κ)) =(m1 − m2)wm1 + (m1 − m2)κw1−m2 − (m1 − 1)m2wm1−m2+1 − κ(m1 − 1)m2 +m1(m2 − 1)w + κm1(m2 − 1)wm1 −m2 , (51) and f ′′(w) =(m1 − m2)m1(m1 − 1)wm1−2 + κ(m1 − m2)(1 − m2)(−m2)w−m2−1 −(m1 − 1)m2(m1 − m2 + 1)(m1 − m2)wm1−m2−1 +κm1(m2 − 1)(m1 − m2)(m1 − m2 − 1)wm1−m2−2 =(m1 − m2)(cid:0)m1(m1 − 1)wm1−2 + κm2(m2 − 1)w−m2−1 − (m1 − 1)m2(m1 − m2 + 1)wm1 −m2−1 + κm1(m2 − 1)(m1 − m2 − 1)wm1 −m2−2(cid:1) =(m1 − m2)m1(m1 − 1)wm1−2 − (m1 − 1)m2m1wm1−m2−1 + κm1(m2 − 1)(m1 − 1)wm1 −m2−2 }  . } + κm2(m2 − 1)w−m2−1 + (m1 − 1)m2(m2 − 1)wm1−m2−1 − κm1(m2 − 1)m2wm1−m2−2 {z (52) (A) {z (B) Let us temporarily denote f1(w) = (1 − m2w1−m2 + (m2 − 1)κw−m2 ). Since f ′ 1(w) = −m2(1 − m2)w−m2 − (m2 − 1)m2κw−m2−1 = (−m2)(1 − m2)w−m2−1(w − κ) < 0, 36 (A) =m1(m1 − 1)(wm1−2 − m2wm1−m2−1 + κ(m2 − 1)wm1−m2−2) =m1(m1 − 1)wm1−2 (1 − m2w1−m2 + (m2 − 1)κw−m2 ) >m1(m1 − 1)wm2−2g1(κ) = m1(m1 − 1)wm2−2f1(κ) = m1(m1 − 1)wm2 −2(1 − κ1−m2 ) =f1(w) {z } >0. Let us temporarily denote Since f2(w) = (κ + (m1 − 1)wm1 − κm1wm1−1). f ′ 2(w) = m1(m1 − 1)wm1−1 − κm1(m1 − 1)wm1−2 = m1(m1 − 1)wm1 −2(w − κ) < 0, (B) =m2(m2 − 1)(κw−m2−1 + (m1 − 1)wm1 −m2−1 − κm1wm1−m2−2) =m2(m2 − 1)w−m2−1 (κ + (m1 − 1)wm1 − κm1wm1−1) >m2(m2 − 1)w−m2−1f2(κ) = m2(m2 − 1)w−m2−1κ(1 − κm1−1) > 0. =f2(w) {z } (53) (54) By (52), (53) and (54), we can conclude that f ′′(w) > 0 on (0, κ) and f (w) has a unique solution w on (0, 1) with w ∈ (0, κ). (Step 3) The two free boundaries bα and bβ are uniquely determined. Moreover, 0 < bα < (1 − δα) and (1 + δβ) < bβ < ∞. From (47), bα = (1 − δα) m1 − 1 m1 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 and bβ = (1 + δβ) m1 − 1 m1 wm 1 − κ wm1 − w . Thus, bα and bβ are uniquely determined. Let us temporarily denote Since we deduce that This leads to f3(w) = wm1 − m1w + κm1 − κ. f ′ 3(w) = m1(wm1−1 − 1) > 0 and f3(0) > 0, f3(w) > 0 on (0, κ). m1 − 1 m1 wm 1 − κ wm1 − w > 1 and bβ > (1 + δβ). Let us also temporarily denote f4(w) = (m1 − 1)wm1 − κm1wm1−1 + κ. Since f ′ 4(w) = (m1 − 1)m1wm1−2(w − κ) < 0 and f4(κ) = κ − κm1 > 0, we deduce that This leads to f4(w) > 0 on (0, κ). m1 − 1 m1 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 < 1 37 and bα < (1 − δα). (Step 4) In z ∈ (bα, bβ), H ′(z) < 0 and attains minimum at bm. First, we will show that D1 > 0 and D2 < 0. Since D1 = (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r m2 − m1 , D2 = (α − 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bα r m1 − m2 D1 > 0 ⇐⇒ (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r < 0. ⇐⇒ bα > −m2 m2 − 1 r δ (1 − δα). ⇐⇒ (1 − δα) m1 − 1 m1 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 > −m2 m2 − 1 r δ (1 − δα). ⇐⇒ 1 κ wm1 − 1 wm1−1 − 1 > 1. ⇐⇒ κwm1 −1 > wm1 . Similarly, we can deduce that D2 < 0. We know that H ′(bα) = H ′(bβ) = 0 and H ′′(z) = D1m1(m1 − 1) b2 α bα(cid:19)m1−2 (cid:18) z + D2m2 α (cid:18) z bα(cid:19)m2−2 b2 . Since H ′′(bm) = 0, it is enough to show that By the definition of bm, bα < bm < bβ. bα < bm < bβ ⇐⇒ 1 <(cid:18) −D2m2(m2 − 1) D1m1(m1 − 1) (cid:19) 1 m1−m2 < 1 x . Since D1 = (α − 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bα r m2 − m1 , D2 = we can easily check that (α − 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bα r m1 − m2 ⇐⇒ bα < (1 − δα). Also, we know that This implies that D1 = −(β + 1 δ )m2 + (m2 − 1) bβ m2 − m1 r , D2 = −(β + 1 δ )m1 + (m1 − 1) bβ m1 − m2 r m1 −m2 D1m1(m1 − 1) (cid:19) 1 1 <(cid:18) −D2m2(m2 − 1) (cid:18) bα bβ(cid:19)m1 (cid:18) −D2m2(m2 − 1) D1m1(m1 − 1) (cid:19) 1 m1 −m2 < 1 x ⇐⇒ bβ > (1 + δβ). Thus, we deduce that and bα < bm < bβ. H ′′(z) < 0, on (bα, bm) and H ′′(z) > 0, on (bm, bβ). Hence, H ′(z) attains minimum at z = bm and H ′(z) < 0 on (bα, bβ). (Step 4) H(z) satisfies the variational inequality (38). 38 (55) , , (cid:18) bα bβ(cid:19)m2 . • For z ∈ (bα, bβ). it is clear that Since H(bα) = α, H(bβ) = −β and H ′(z) is strictly decreasing function on (bα, bβ), LH + 1 − z = 0. (56) −β < H(z) < α on (bα, bβ). • For z ≤ bα, H(z) = α and LH + 1 − z = 1 − δα − z ≥ 0. • For z ≥ bβ, H(z) = −β and LH + 1 − z = 1 + δβ − z ≤ 0. From (Step 1) ∼ (Step 4), we have proved the desired result. By Proposition A.1, w(y, c) given by w(y, c) = αu′(c), D1u′(c)(cid:18) y u′(c)bα(cid:19)m1 −βu′(c), + D2u′(c)(cid:18) y u′(c)bα(cid:19)m2 + u′(c) δ − y r , for y u′(c) for bα < for y u′(c) ≤ bα, < bβ, (57) y u′(c) ≥ bβ, is a solution of the double obstacle problem (37).  Using the w(y, c) in the equation (57), we construct the dual value function J(y, c) as follows: (i) For bαu′(c) < y < bβu′(c), J(y, c) =Z c 0 u′(x)D1(cid:18) y (ii) For bαu′(c) ≥ y, (iii) For bβu′(c) ≤ y, c y u′(x)bα(cid:19)m1 J(y, c) = J(cid:18)y, I( J(y, c) = J(cid:18)y, I( u′(x)D2(cid:18) dx −Z ∞ )(cid:19) + α(cid:18)u(c) − u(I( )(cid:19) − β(cid:18)u(c) − u(I( u′(x)bα(cid:19)m2 ))(cid:19) . ))(cid:19) . y bα y bα y bβ y bβ dx + u(c) δ − yc r (58) (59) (60) where the function I(·) : R+ → R+ is defined by I(y) ≡ (u′)−1(y) = y− 1 γ . Remark A.1. It is easy to check that and for u(c) = c1−γ 1−γ with γ(6= 1) > 0, m1 > 1 and m2 < 0. m2 < − 1 − γ γ < m1. Thus, the two integrals in (58) are well-defined and J(y, c) is J(y, c) = D1 yc (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 yc (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1 + 1 δ c1−γ 1 − γ − yc r . +D2 39 Remark A.2. For J(y, c) defined in (58), (59) and (60), we can easily confirm that Jc(y, c) = w(y, c). Proposition A.2. For the function J(y, c) defined in (58), (59) and (60), the following state- ments are true: 1. J(y, c) is a twice continuously differentiable and satisfies the HJB equaton (16). Moreover, the regions IR, NR and DR are represented by IR = {(y, c) ∈ R y ≤ u′(c)bα}, NR = {(y, c) ∈ R u′(c)bα < y < u′(c)bβ}, DR = {(y, c) ∈ R u′(c)bβ ≤ y}, respectively. 2. For any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), Z t 0 (−θ)ysJy(ys, cs)ds, ∀t ≥ 0 is a martingale. 3. For any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−), e−δtE [J(yt, ct)] = 0. lim t→∞ Proof. (Proof of 1.) First, with reference to the construction of the dual value function J(y, c), we will show that J is a continuously differentiable if we prove that Jy, Jyy, and Jcc are continuous along the free boundaries c = I( y bα ) and c = I( y bβ ). Then, we can compute Jy(y, c) =Jy(y, I( =Jy(y, I( and Jy(y, c) =Jy(y, I( =Jy(y, I( y bα y bα y bβ y bβ )) +(cid:18)Jc(y, I( y bα )) − αu′(I( y bα ))(cid:19) d dy(cid:18)I( y bα )(cid:19) for y ≤ u′(c)bα )), )) −(cid:18)−Jc(y, I( y bβ )). ) − βu′(I( y bα ))(cid:19) d dy(cid:18)I( y bβ )(cid:19) for y ≥ u′(c)bβ (61) (62) (63) Thus, Jy(y, c) is continuous along the free boundaries. Similarly, we can obtain Jyy(y, c) =Jyy(y, I( Jyy(y, c) =Jyy(y, I( y bα y bβ )), for y ≤ u′(c)bα, )), for y ≤ u′(c)bβ, and hence Jyy is continuous along the free boundaries. We know that Jc(y, c) = u′(c)H(y/u′(c)) and H(z) is C1-function. Thus, it is clear that Jcc(y, c) is continuous function and we conclude that J(y, c) is C2-function. Next, we will show that J(y, c) satisfies the HJB-equation (16). • The region NR: Since Jc(y, c) = u′(c)H(y/u′(c)), NR ={(y, c) ∈ R −βu′(c) < Jc(y, c) < αu′(c)} ={(y, c) ∈ R −β < H( y u′(c) ) < α} ={(y, c) ∈ R bα < y u′(c) < bβ}. 40 Also, we can easily confirm that LJ + u(c) − yc = 0. • The region IR: We deduce that IR = {(y, c) ∈ R Jc(y, c) = αu′(c)} = {(y, c) ∈ R y u′(c) ≤ bα}. Clearly, −Jc(y, c) − βu′(c) = −(α + β)u′(c) < 0. Since Jy(y, c) = Jy(y, I( y bα )) and Jyy(y, c) = Jyy(y, I( y bα )) on IR, LJ(y, c) + u(c) − yc −(u(I( =(cid:18)LJ(y, I( =Z I( y =Z I( y y bα ) bα bα c c ) y bα )) + u(I( =0 {z )) y bα )) − yI( +δJ(y, I( y bα )) − δJ(y, c) + u(c) − yc y bα )) − yI( y bα )(cid:19) } (cid:0)δJc(y, η) − (u′(η) − y)(cid:1) dη u′(η)(cid:18) y − (1 − δα)(cid:19) dη ≤ 0 (cid:18)∵ u′(η) y u′(η) < bα < 1 − δα on IR(cid:19) . • The region DR: Similarly, and DR = {(y, c) ∈ R Jc(y, c) = βu′(c)} = {(y, c) ∈ R y u′(c) ≥ bβ}. Since Jy(y, c) = Jy(y, I( y bβ Jc(y, c) − αu′(c) = −(α + β)u′(c) < 0, )) and Jyy(y, c) = Jyy(y, I( y bβ )) on IR, LJ(y, c) + u(c) − yc y bβ )) + u(I( y bβ )) − yI( y bβ =0 {z y bα )(cid:19) } +δJ(y, I( y bα )) y bα )) −δJ(y, c) + u(c) − yc − (u(I( )) − yI( =(cid:18)LJ(y, I( = −Z c = −Z c I( y bβ I( y bβ )(cid:0)δJc(y, η) − (u′(η) − y)(cid:1) dη u′(η)(cid:18) y − (1 + δβ)(cid:19) dη ≤ 0 (cid:18)∵ u′(η) ) y u′(η) > bβ > 1 + δβ on DR(cid:19) . (64) (65) Thus, J(y, c) satisfies the HJB-equation max{LJ + u(c) − yc, Jc − αu′(c), −Jc − βu′(c)} = 0. (Proof of 2.) Let Nt =Z t 0 e−δs(−θys)Jy(ys, cs)dBs. 41 To show the process Nt is a martingale, it is suffice to prove that E(cid:20)Z t 0 (cid:16)e−δs(−θys)Jy(ys, cs)(cid:17)2 dt(cid:21) < ∞, for ∀t ≥ 0. (see Chapter 3 in Oksendal (2005)) First, we consider the case when (yt, ct) ∈ NR. Then, I( yt bα ) < ct < I( yt bβ ) or bα <(cid:18) yt u′(ct)(cid:19) < bβ. Since yJy(y, c) = D1m1yc (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y u′(c)bα(cid:19)m1−1 + D2m2yc (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y u′(c)bα(cid:19)m2−1 − yc r , there exist constants K11, K12 > 0 such that ytJy(yt, ct) ≤ K11ytct ≤ K12(yt)− 1−γ γ . (66) When (yt, ct) ∈ IR, we know that Jy(yt, ct) =Jy(yt, I( yt bα )), if (yt, ct) ∈ IR. In this case, yJy(y, I( y bα )) = D1m1yI( y bα ) (1 − γ + γm1)bα + D2m2yI( y bα ) (1 − γ + γm2)bα − yI( y bα r ) , Thus, there exist constants K21, K22 > 0 such that ytJy(yt, ct) ≤ K21ytI( ) ≤ K22(yt)− 1−γ γ . yt bα Similarly, when (yt, ct) ∈ DR, there exist constants K31, K32 > 0 such that ytJy(yt, ct) ≤ K31ytI( ) ≤ K32(yt)− 1−γ γ . yt bβ By (66), (67) and (68), for any (yt, ct) ∈ R, ytJy(yt, ct) ¯K4(yt)− 1−γ γ . for some constant K4 > 0. Hence E(cid:20)Z t 0 (cid:16)e−δs(−θys)Jy(ys, cs)(cid:17)2 dt(cid:21) ≤ K4E(cid:20)e−δt(y This implies that Kt is a martingale for t ≥ 0. − 1−γ t γ )2(cid:21) = K4Z t 0 (67) (68) e−(K− θ2 2 ( γ−1 γ )2)sds < ∞. (69) (Proof of 3.) If (yt, ct) ∈ NR, then Since, J(y, c) =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) u′(ct)(cid:19) < bβ. bα <(cid:18) yt c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 J(yt, ct) ≤ K51(yt)− 1−γ γ . 42 D1 yc (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y + D2 yc (1 − γ + γm2)bβ (cid:18) y c−γ bβ(cid:19)m2−1 there exists a constant K51 > 0 such that + 1 δ c1−γ 1 − γ − (70) yc r (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (71) When (yt, ct) ∈ IR, we know that J(yt, ct) = J(cid:18)yt, I( yt bα )(cid:19) + α(cid:18)u(ct) − u(I( yt bα ))(cid:19) . Thus, there exits a constant K52 such that J(yt, ct) ≤ K52(yt)− 1−γ γ + αu(ct). Similarly, for (yt, ct) ∈ DR, there exists a constant K53 such that J(yt, ct) ≤ K53(yt)− 1−γ γ + βu(ct). By (71), (73) and (74), for any (yt, ct) ∈ R, there exist a constant K54 > 0 such that By the admissibility of the consumption strategy, J(yt, ct) ≤ K54(cid:16)(yt)− 1−γ γ + u(ct)(cid:17) . e−δtu(ct)dt(cid:21) < +∞. E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 (72) (73) (74) (75) Since {ct}∞ nuities. Hence, applying Fubini's theorem, we deduce that t=0 is a finite variation process, its sample paths can have at most countable disconti- Z ∞ 0 Ehe−δtu(ct)i dt = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δtu(ct)dt(cid:21) < +∞. and From (75), lim t→∞ Ehe−δtJ(yt, ct)i ≤K54(cid:16) lim t→∞ lim t→∞ Ehe−δtu(ct)i = 0. γ i + lim Ehe−δt(yt)− 1−γ Ehe−δtJ(yt, ct)i = 0. t→∞ lim t→∞ Thus, we can conclude that for any admissible consumption strategy (c+, c−) and its associated consumption process c, Ehe−δtu(ct)dti(cid:17) = 0. (76) B Proof of Theorem 3.1 We will show that the duality relationship in the following steps: (Step 1) First, we will prove that the dual value function J(y, c) is strictly convex in y: By direct computation, ∂2J ∂y2 =c D1m1(m1 − 1) (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 + D2m2(m2 − 1) (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! . (77) y Since we deuce that D1 > 0, D2 < 0, 1 − γ + γm1 > 0, and 1 − γ + γm2 < 0, ∂2J ∂y2 > 0 for y > 0, and thus J(y, c) is strictly convex in y. 43 Let us denote the Lagrangian L defined in (14) by L(y, c) for the Lagrangian multiplier y and consumption profile c. (Step 2) We will show that there exist a unique solution y∗ > 0 such that y∗ and the optimal consumption {c∗ t=0 maximize the Lagrangian L(y, c). t }∞ From Proposition 3.1, we deduce that − c r D1m1c (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 + D2m2c (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! ,  ∂J ∂y (y, c) = ∂J ∂y (cid:18)y, I( ∂y (cid:18)y, I( ∂J y bα y bβ )(cid:19) , )(cid:19) , For a sufficiently small y > 0, and for a sufficiently large y > 0, This implies that for (y, c) ∈ NR, for (y, c) ∈ IR, for (y, c) ∈ DR. (y, c) ∈ IR, (y, c) ∈ DR. (78) (79) (80) (81) lim y→0 ∂J ∂y (y, c) = lim y→0 lim y→∞ ∂J ∂y (y, c) = lim y→∞ y bα ∂J ∂y (cid:18)y, I( ∂y (cid:18)y, I( ∂J )(cid:19) = +∞, )(cid:19) = 0. y bβ Since J(y, c) is strictly convex in y, for given X > 0, there exists a unique y∗ such that Thus, there exist optimal consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) such that X = − ∂J ∂y (y∗, c). J(y∗, c) = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)h(y∗ t , c∗ t )dt − αu′(c∗ t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t (cid:1)(cid:21) , where y∗ t = y∗eβtHt, (c∗,+, c∗,−) ∈ Π(c) and c∗ t = c + c∗,+ t − c∗,− t . This means that since the Lagrangian is concave, y∗ and c∗ are maximizers of the Lagrangian. (Step 3) c∗ satisfies the budget constraint with equality. Define y+h = y∗ + h and y−h = y∗ − h with y∗ ≥ h > 0 (For convenience of notation we drop the time subscript t). Then, Since c∗, y∗ maximizers of the Lagrangian L, we have L(c∗, y±h) ≥ L(c∗, y∗). lim sup h↓0 L(c∗, y+h) − L(c∗, y∗) h ≤ 0, lim inf h↑0 L(c∗, y−h) − L(c∗, y∗) h ≤ 0, and thus we deduce ±(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 Htc∗ t dt(cid:21)(cid:19) ≤ 0. 44 This leads to X = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 Htc∗ t dt(cid:21) This implies that c∗ satisfies the budget constraint with equality. (Step 4) c∗ is optimal consumption. Let (c+, c−) ∈ Π(c) be a feasible consumption strategy, i.e., it is admissible and satisfies the budget constraint. Since c satisfies the budget constraint, E(cid:20)Z ∞ ≤E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ where y∗ is defined in (Step 2). t − βu′(ct)dc− t − βu′(ct)dc− t (cid:1)(cid:21) t (cid:1)(cid:21) + y∗(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 (82) Htctdt(cid:21)(cid:19) Since y∗ and c∗ maximize the Lagrangian L and c∗ satisfies the budget constraint with equality, 0 E(cid:20)Z ∞ ≤E(cid:20)Z ∞ ≤E(cid:20)Z ∞ =E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 0 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ e−δt(cid:0)u(ct)dt − αu′(ct)dc+ e−δt(cid:0)u(c∗ e−δt(cid:0)u(c∗ t )dt − αu′(c∗ t )dt − αu′(c∗ t=0 is optimal. Therefore, (c∗ t )∞ t − βu′(ct)dc− t − βu′(ct)dc− t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t t (cid:1)(cid:21) t (cid:1)(cid:21) + y∗(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ (cid:1)(cid:21) + y∗(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ (cid:1)(cid:21) . 0 0 t Htctdt(cid:21)(cid:19) t dt(cid:21)(cid:19) Htc∗ (83) Step 5) Proof of duality-relationship in (20) Since c∗ is optimal consumption, for y > 0, we deduce V (X, c) = E(cid:20)Z ∞ = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 0 ≤ sup e−δt(cid:0)u(c∗ e−δt(cid:0)u(c∗ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 (c+,c−)∈Π(c) t )dt − αu′(c∗ t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t t )dt − αu′(c∗ t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t e−δtu(ct)dt(cid:21) + y(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 (cid:1)(cid:21) (cid:1)(cid:21) + y(cid:18)X − E(cid:20)Z ∞ Htctdt(cid:21)(cid:19) 0 Htc∗ t dt(cid:21)(cid:19) = J(y, c) + yX, where (ct)∞ t= is the optimal consumption process for Problem 3 for y > 0. This implies that However, we know that V (X, c) ≤ inf y>0(cid:16)J(y, c) + yX(cid:17). V (X, c) = E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)u(c∗ = J(y∗, c) + y∗X. t )dt − αu′(c∗ t )dc∗,+ t − βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t (cid:1)(cid:21) Thus, This completes the proof. V (X, c) = min y>0(cid:16)J(y, c) + yX(cid:17). 45 C Proof of Proposition 3.2 First, we show that the optimal consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) given in (21) is admissible. We can see that for optimal consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) and its associated consumption c∗, bα ≤ yt t )−γ ≤ bβ (c∗ for ∀ t ≥ 0. Then, there exist constants K61, K62 > 0 such that u(c∗ t ) ≤ K61(yt)− 1−γ γ and ytc∗ t ≤ K62y − 1−γ t γ , (84) (85) for all t ≥ 0. Thus, Since (c∗,+ t , c∗,− t E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δtu(c∗ t )dt(cid:21) ≤ K61E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 ) is the optimal strategy, it is clear that e−δt(yt)− 1−γ E(cid:20)Z ∞ 0 e−δt(cid:0)αu′(c∗ t )dc∗,+ t + βu′(c∗ t )dc∗,− t γ dt(cid:21) < +∞. (cid:1)(cid:21) < +∞. Above two inequalities imply (c∗,+ , c∗,− t t ) is admissible consumption strategy. Moreover, by (84) and (85), there exists a constant K64 > 0 such that J(yt, c∗ D1 t ) =(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) + 1 δ (c∗ t )1−γ 1 − γ ≤K64(yt)− 1−γ γ − (c∗ ytc∗ t ytc∗ t (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) r (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Ehe−δtJ(yt, c∗ lim t→∞ This implies yt t )−γbα(cid:19)m1−1 + D2 ytc∗ t (1 − γ + γm2)bβ (cid:18) yt t )−γ bβ(cid:19)m2−1 (c∗ (86) (87) γ i EEhe−δt(yt)− 1−γ e−Kt = 0. t )i ≤K64 lim t→∞ =K64 lim t→∞ From the construction of the optimal consumption strategy, it is easy to check that the consumption strategy (c∗,+, c∗,−) given in (21) satisfies the following assumption in Theorem A.1: (yt, c∗ t ) ∈ {(y, c) ∈ R : LJ(y, c) + h(y, c) = 0} , Lebesgue-a.e., P-a.s., 0 Z t Z t 0 e−δs(cid:0)Jc(ys, c∗ e−δs(cid:0)−Jc(ys, c∗ s)(cid:1) dc∗,+ s)(cid:1) dc∗,− s) − αu′(c∗ s = 0, s) − βu′(c∗ s = 0, for all t ≥ 0, P − a.s., for all t ≥ 0, P − a.s. (88) D Proof of Theorem 3.2 From Theorem 3.1, we know that there exists a unique solution y∗ for the minimization problem (20). The first-order condition implies that X = − (y∗, c) ∂J ∂y − = c r D1m1c (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 + 46 D2m2c (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y c−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! . (89) Since Problem 3 is time-consistent, y∗ starting at s ≥ 0. Thus, for optimal wealth X ∗ s at time s, we have s = y∗eδsHs is the minimizer for the duality relationship X ∗ s = − c∗ s c∗ s r D1m1 (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y∗ s s)−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 (c∗ + D2m2 (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y∗ s s)−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! . (90) (c∗ During the time in which y∗ t c∗ t = c∗ s and thus the optimal wealth X ∗ t for t ≥ s is given by is inside the NR, the optimal consumption c∗ is constant, i.e., X ∗ t = − c∗ s c∗ s r D1m1 (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y∗ t s)−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 (c∗ + D2m2 (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y∗ t s)−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! . (91) (c∗ By Proposition 3.2, we know that the agent does not increase or decrease his/her consumption in the region Let us define x, ¯x as follows: bα < y∗ t t )−γ < bβ. (c∗ x = X (bβ), ¯x = X (bα), where X (y) is X (y) = − 1 r D1m1 (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−1 Since ∂X ∂y (y) = − D1m1(m1 − 1) (1 − γ + γm1)b2 bα(cid:19)m1−2 α(cid:18) y + + D2m2 (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y D2m2(m2 − 1) (1 − γ + γm2)b2 bα(cid:19)m2−1! . bα(cid:19)m2−2! α(cid:18) y and D1 > 0, D2 < 0, 1 − γ + γm1 > 0, and 1 − γ + γm2 < 0, X (y) is strictly increasing function of y. This means that the consumption stays for t ≥ s constant if and only if c∗ sx < X ∗ t < c∗ s ¯x. This completes the proof. E Proof of Proposition 3.3 Proof of (a). By applying the generalized It´o's lemma(see Harrison (1985)) to the optimal wealth process X ∗ t , dX ∗ t = − + ∂2J ∂y2 (y∗ ∂2J (y∗ ∂y∂c t , c∗ t )dy∗ t − t , c∗ t )dc∗,− t ∂3J ∂y3 (y∗ t , c∗ t )(dy∗ t )2 − ∂2J ∂y∂c 1 2 . (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,+ t (92) t , c∗ t ) ∈ NR, the agent does not adjust his/her consumption. This means that dc∗,+ t = If (y∗ dc∗,− t = 0 and thus ∂2J ∂y∂c (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,+ t = ∂2J ∂y∂c (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,− t = 0. If (y∗ t , c∗ t ) ∈ IR, the agent should increase his/her consumption. This implies that ∂J ∂c (y∗ t , c∗ t ) = αu′(c∗ t ), dc∗,− t = 0, 47 and hence Similarly, we also obtain ∂2J ∂y∂c ∂2J ∂y∂c (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,+ t = (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,+ t = ∂2J ∂y∂c ∂2J ∂y∂c (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,− t = 0. (y∗ t , c∗ t )dc∗,− t = 0. when (y∗ t , c∗ t ) ∈ NR. Therefore, by comparing the equation (92) with the wealth dynamics (1) and using the fact that dy∗ t = (δ − r)y∗ t dt − θy∗ t dBt, we deduce the optimal portfolio policy π∗ t as follows: π∗ t = θ σ y∗ t ∂2J ∂y2 (y∗ t , c∗ t ), and π∗ t = c∗ s D1m1(m1 − 1) (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) θ σ Proof of (b). y∗ t t )−γ bα(cid:19)m1−1 (c∗ + D2m2(m2 − 1) (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y∗ t t )−γ bα(cid:19)m2−1! . (c∗ F Proof of Theorem 3.3 (93) (94) For c∗ assume c∗ sx < X ∗ t = 1. t < c∗ s ¯x, for t ≥ s, the consumption stays constant. Thus, for simplicity, we can By Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 3.3, we deduce that X ∗ t (y∗ t ) − γσ θ π∗ t (y∗ t ) = −H ′(y∗ t ), where H(·) is defined in Proposition A.1. Then, G(y∗ t ) , γσ σ t (y∗ π∗ t ) X ∗ t (y∗ t ) = 1 + H ′(y∗ t ) X ∗ t (y∗ t ) . Since H ′(bα) = H ′(bβ) = 0, G(bα) = G(bβ) = 1. (95) (96) We will show that there exists a unique b ∈ (bα, bβ) such that G(·) is a strictly decreasing function on (bα, b) and strictly decreasing function on (b, bβ). G′(y) = H ′′(y)X(y) − H ′(y)X ′ (y) (X(y))2 . (For convenience of notation we drop the time subscript t and the optimal subscript ∗.) Let us define the numerator of G′(y) as ¯G(y), i.e., By the proof in Proposition A.1, we know that ¯G(y) = H ′′(y)X(y) − H ′(y)X ′(y). (97) (98) Thus, Since X(y) = 1 r − D1m1 (1 − γ + γm1)bα(cid:18) y bα (cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−1 bα(cid:19)m1−1 bα (cid:18) y D2m2 + bβ(cid:19)m2−1 + H ′(y) = D1m1 H ′′(bα) < 0, H ′′(bβ) > 0. ¯G(bα) < 0 and ¯G(bβ) > 0. D2m2 (1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m2−1 , − 1 r , 48 we have X ′(y) = − D1m1(m1 − 1) (1 − γ + γm1)b2 + D2m2(m2 − 1) (1 − γ + γm2)b2 bα(cid:19)m1−2 α(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−2 (cid:18) y + H ′(y) = D1m1(m1 − 1) b2 α D2m2(m2 − 1) b2 α Hence, ¯G(y) = = , + D2m2(m2 − 1)2 (1 − γ + γm2)b2 γ r D1m1(m1 − 1)2 (1 − γ + γm1)b2 bα(cid:19)m1−2 α(cid:18) y γD1D2m1m2(m1 − m2)2 (1 − γ + γm1)(1 − γ + γm2)b3 γym2−2 α D1m1(m1 − 1)2 r(1 − γ + γm1) (cid:18) y b2 − bα(cid:19)m1+m2−3 α(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−m2 − γym2−2 b2 α G(y). , . bα(cid:19)m2−2 α(cid:18) y (cid:18) y bβ(cid:19)m2−2 bα(cid:19)m2−2! α(cid:18) y D1D2m1m2(m1 − m2)2 (1 − γ + γm1)(1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−1 D2m2(m2 − 1)2 r(1 − γ + γm2)! + We know that m1 > 1, m2 < 0, D1 > 0, D2 < 0, 1 − γ + γm1 > 0 and 1 − γ + γm2 < 0, thus, G(y) is a strictly increasing function of y. Since ¯G(bα) < 0, ¯G(bβ) > 0, we deduce that Thus, there exists a unique b ∈ (bα, bβ) such that G(bα) < 0, G(bβ) > 0. G(b) = 0. This implies that G′(y) < 0, for y ∈ (bα, b) and G′(y) > 0, for y ∈ (b, bβ). To sum up, we conclude that RCRRA is a strictly increasing for X ∈ (cx, bX) and a strictly decreasing for X ∈ (bX, c¯x). Moreover, RCRRA approaches γ when X approaches cx or c¯x. (Here, X = cX (b) and b ∈ (bα, bβ) is a unique solution of the following algebraic equation: D1m1(m1 − 1)2 r(1 − γ + γm1) (cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−m2 − D1D2m1m2(m1 − m2)2 (1 − γ + γm1)(1 − γ + γm2)bα(cid:18) y bα(cid:19)m1−1 G(y) = (99) + D2m2(m2 − 1)2 r(1 − γ + γm2) . 49
1903.09819	1	1903	2019-03-23T13:23:30	On the core of normal form games with a continuum of players : a correction	[ "econ.TH" ]	We study the core of normal form games with a continuum of players and without side payments. We consider the weak-core concept, which is an approximation of the core, introduced by Weber, Shapley and Shubik. For payoffs depending on the players' strategy profile, we prove that the weak-core is nonempty. The existence result establishes a weak-core element as a limit of elements in weak-cores of appropriate finite games. We establish by examples that our regularity hypotheses are relevant in the continuum case and the weak-core can be strictly larger than the Aumann's $\alpha$-core. For games where payoffs depend on the distribution of players' strategy profile, we prove that analogous regularity conditions ensuring the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria are irrelevant for the non-vacuity of the weak-core.	econ.TH	econ	On the core of normal form games with a continuum of players : a correction∗ Y. Askoura March 26, 2019 LEMMA, Universit´e Paris II, Panth´eon-Assas, 4 rue Blaise Desgoffe, 75006 Paris, France. email : [email protected] Abstract We study the core of normal form games with a continuum of players and without side payments. We consider the weak-core concept, which is an approximation of the core, introduced by Weber, Shapley and Shubik. For payoffs depending on the play- ers' strategy profile, we prove that the weak-core is nonempty. The existence result establishes a weak-core element as a limit of elements in weak-cores of appropriate finite games. We establish by examples that our regularity hypotheses are relevant in the continuum case and the weak-core can be strictly larger than the Aumann's α- core. For games where payoffs depend on the distribution of players' strategy profile, we prove that analogous regularity conditions ensuring the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria are irrelevant for the non-vacuity of the weak-core. keywords : Weak-core; α−core; Game with a continuum of players; Large anonymous games; Normal form games. JEL Classification : C02; C71. 1 Introduction It is commonly admitted that the continuum property on the set of agents is valuable in economy and clearly inferring results from finite games is not possible or at least not obvious. Hence the study of the continuum case may be an interesting task per se and requires, in the absolute, proper techniques. For some type of continuum games, it is possible, using adequate techniques, to prove analogous results to that known in finite- player games. Some other type of games with a continuum of players may involve, for the existence of pure strategy equilibria, unusual regularity conditions. For more accuracy, let ∗This is an amended version of the original paper with the same title published in : Mathematical Social Sciences 89(2017), 32-42. 1 us summarize roughly two models of continuum games prevalent in the literature. Denote by (T,T , µ) a probability space of players, and A a common action space for the players. Under some other regularly assumptions making all the involved entities meaningful, a strategy profile is a function f : T → A. The payoffs can be given by U (t, f (t), f ), a game which we denote U , or by W (t, f (t), µf−1), a game we denote W . For the game U , the existence of a Nash equilibrium [Khan, 1985, 1986, Balder, 1995, 1999] is obtained using expected conditions, mainly : the concavity of U (t, a,·), (t, a) ∈ T × A, and some appropriate continuity hypothesis of U (t,·,·), t ∈ T . However, in case of the game W , Schmeidler [1973] shows that a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium exists when A is finite and µ nonatomic. More generally, the countability of the action space A is necessary for the existence of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium [Khan and Sun, 1995, Khan et al., 1997, Khan and Sun, 2002] for W . This is an unexpected condition, or may be viewed as a new condition illustrating that it may happen that we can learn more in continuum games comparatively to finite-player games. The Nash equilibrium is extensively investigated in the literature of normal form games with a continuum of players. Whereas, this is not the case for the α−core. Up to now, many questions remain unsolved for the α−core in the continuum situation. Recall that the α-core of normal form games is introduced by Aumann [1961]. Its main existence result, for games with a finite set of players, is established by Scarf [1971]. Some generalizations to games of different aspects, but always a finite set of players are obtained in [Kajii, 1992, Uyanik, 2015, Askoura, 2015, Askoura et al., 2013]. When considering a continuum set of players, this concept must be somewhat approximated. Weber [1981] introduced an adequate approximation of the core, called weak-core, in the setting of games with a continuum of players in a characteristic function form. In this paper, we focus on the weak-core in the setting of strategic normal form games with a continuum of players and without side payments, as initiated in [Askoura, 2011]. We succeeded to prove an existence result for a particular case of payoffs for the game U . We assume that the payoffs depend only on the strategy profile of the players, more precisely, payoffs of the form U (t, f ). Together with the concavity assumption and some other regularity conditions on payoffs, we establish an existence result. Notwithstanding their conceptual differences and their targeted economic situations, the Nash equilibrium on one hand and the α−core on the other involve, for their existence, analogous regularity conditions1 for games with a finite set of players. We prove, in this paper, that this is not the case for games with a continuum set of players of type W . We provide an example of a game satisfying all the conditions required for the existence of the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium, but its weak-core is empty. Moreover, this example satisfies additional conditions that may be expected to be necessary for the weak-core. In this example the payoffs are more general, they depend on individual actions and on the distribution of the strategy profile of the players. This proves that for general payoffs, the weak-core may be empty and must require (for its existence) more restrictive hypotheses. 1See Section 5. 2 For payoffs depending on the strategy profile and individual actions of the players (the game U ), we expect that the weak-core can be empty under reasonable and intuitive conditions, even similar to that we use hereafter to study particular payoffs. For this kind of payoffs we do not succeeded to provide counter-examples. Note that these two case studies (payoffs depending directly on strategies or on their distributions) may be different when convexity assumptions are used. Properly speaking, the core is already approximated in order to relax the convexity as- sumption in finite large games [Shapley and Shubik, 1966]. It is shown that the convexity (of preference sets) is not very important when the set of agents becomes large enough. In transferable utility case, Shapley and Shubik [1966] obtained interesting results (non- vacuity of approximate cores) for exchange economies with sufficiently many participants. This approximation type is successfully applied later for (finite large) games induced from pergames (a configuration in which the payoff achievable by a coalition is a function of the number of its players and their characteristics or attributes) in [Wooders, 1983, 1994, 2008] and [Wooders and Zame, 1984]. In the case of a continuum set of players, Weber [1979] studied this concept (approximation in a same direction for the core) and proved its existence for balanced games in characteristic function form and without side payments. A slightly different approximation of the core is introduced by Kannai [1970, 1972] and applied for finite markets. Hildenbrand et al. [1973] carried on this direction in order to generalize the Shapley-Shubik results for large economies without side payments. Other studies on the approximation of the core can be found in (Anderson [1985] and Starr [1969]). Weber's approximation [Weber, 1981] we deal with, in this work, is different from the above. Its purpose is not the overcoming of the nonexistence of the exact core resulting from the non convexity assumption, but to comply with the continuum case and upper semi- continuous payoffs. For games with a finite set of players and continuous payoffs, our weak- core is exactly the α−core of Aumann. We provide, in Section 4.2, an example of game satisfying all the used conditions for the non vacuity of the weak-core, in which the α−core is empty, thus legitimating the introduction of the approximation. Even for the weak-core approximation, a second exemple shows that an additional regularity condition on payoffs with respect to players must be assumed, in order to handle the continuum framework. This role is played by the equi-upper-semicontinuity of players' utility functions, a fact that does not show up in games with finite sets of players. In fact, for finite games, this assumption is satisfied automatically, provided all utilities are upper-semicontinuous. For non exhaustive list of works devoted to games with a continuum of players, the reader is referred to Weber [1981, 1979], Ichiishi and Weber [1978], Rosenmuller [1975] and Kaneko and Wooders [1996] for utility characteristic function form games. For more general frame- works concerning (exchange) economies and markets, we can cite the famous works of Aumann [1964, 1966], Hildenbrand [1974, 1968], Mas-Colell [1975], Hart et al. [1974] and Khan and Yamazaki [1981]. In a non-cooperative setting, the Nash equilibrium is partic- ularly investigated in Schmeidler [1973], Mas-Colell [1984], Khan [1989], Rath [1992] and Khan et al. [1997]. 3 2 Preliminaries, overall framework Let (T,T , µ) be a probability space, where T is a σ-algebra on T and µ a σ−additive probability measure on T . The space T refers to the set of players. Denote by T + the set of elements of T with strictly positive µ-measure. The sets of T + refer to coalitions. Note that two coalitions with µ-null symmetric difference will be confused. Let A be a convex compact subset of a separable2 Banach space X. The set A represents the space of actions. It is common to all players. Denote B(X) the Borel σ-algebra of X. Let B(T, X) be the set of all T − B(X) measurable essentially bounded functions from T to X. The space of all measurable functions from T to A (that are automatically essentially bounded) is denoted by B(T, A). It refers to the space of pure strategy profiles. The terms "essentially bounded" refer to the boundedness relatively to the essential supremum norm (cid:107) · (cid:107)B(T,X) on B(T, X) abbreviated esssup-norm and defined by : (cid:107)f(cid:107)B(T,X) = sup{α ∈ IR : µ{t ∈ T,(cid:107)f (t)(cid:107) > α} > 0} where (cid:107) · (cid:107) is the norm of X. Since A is compact, B(T, A) is a norm closed subset of B(T, X). In all this paper the complement of a subset E ⊂ T into T is denoted (cid:123)E. The notation X \ Y refers also to the complement of Y to X. Let E ∈ T . Denote B(E, X) the set of all measurable essentially bounded functions from E to X. B(E, A) is defined similarly and refers to the set of strategies of the coalition E. For fE ∈ B(E, X) and f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, X), denote fE//f(cid:123)E the function defined by fE on E and f(cid:123)E on (cid:123)E. 0E denotes the almost everywhere null function of B(E, X). Since E is measurable, for every measurable function fE ∈ B(E, X), fE//0(cid:123)E ∈ B(T, X) and for every f ∈ B(T, X), fE ∈ B(E, X). Hence, by identifying B(E, X) with the subspace {fE//0(cid:123)E : fE ∈ B(E, X)}, B(T, X) can be represented as the algebraic direct sum : B(T, X) = B(E, X) ⊕ B((cid:123)E, X) Note that this is also true for a finite number of factors. That is, for a given pairwise disjoint finite family Ei ∈ T , i in a finite set I, such that ∪ Ei = T up to a µ-null set, we i∈I have the direct algebraic sum : B(T, X) = ⊕ i∈I B(Ei, X) (1) Endow B(T, X) with a locally convex topology τB(T,X) satisfying the following statement : (C) for every E ∈ T , B(E, A) is compact in B(T, X) for τB(T,X). We will see in the appendix that this condition is satisfied by the usual weak topologies. Denote by τB(E,X) the induced topology (from τB(T,X)) on B(E, X). The condition (C) means that B(E, A) is compact for τB(E,X). In all this paper, if it is not expressly men- tioned, all subspaces and subsets are endowed with the induced topology and all products with the product topology. The abbreviation lsc means lower semi-continuous and usc means upper semi-continuous. 2The separability of X is not relevant because one can consider the subspace spanned by A which is always a separable Banach space. 4 3 The weak-core for a strategic normal form game A (strategic) normal form game with a continuum of players is defined by means of a function U : T × A × B(T, A) → IR. As interpreted above, T stands for the set of players, A the common set of actions and B(T, A) the set of strategy profiles. The payoffs are summarized in U itself. When each player t chooses his strategy f (t) ∈ A, we obtain a function f : T → A. Assuming that this function is measurable, f ∈ B(T, A), each player t receives the gain U (t, f (t), f ). Denote the obtained game by the triple G = ((T, µ), U, A) or simply by U . The weak-core defined in [Weber, 1981] and its blocking concept are adapted to continuum games in normal form of type U as follows : Definition 1. We say that a coalition E ∈ T + blocks the strategy h ∈ B(T, A), if there exist ε > 0 and a strategy fE ∈ B(E, A), such that for all f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), U (t, f (t), fE//f(cid:123)E) > U (t, h(t), h) + ε a.e. on E The weak-core of the game G is the set of strategies that are not blocked by any coalition E ∈ T +. Another conceivable model is to consider the action space as a compact metric space A0 and to define the game by means of a function W : T × A0 × P(A0) → IR. A convexity structure is not needed on A0 (it may be finite following the needs). We denoted by P(A0) the set of probability measures on A0. The space P(A0) is endowed as frequently with the weak (star) topology. To each player t corresponds a utility function W (t,·,·) : A0 ×P(A0) → IR. For this game, the set of strategy profiles B(T, A0) stands simply for T − B(A0) measurable functions. Under the strategy profile f ∈ B(T, A0), each player t receives the gain W (t, f (t), µf−1). Here, µf−1 stands for the image probability of µ under the function f . Denote the obtained game by the triple H = ((T, µ), W, A0) or, as previously, simply by W . The previously defined blocking concept can be stated in an analogous way : Definition 2. For the game H, we say that a coalition E ∈ T + blocks the strategy h ∈ B(T, A0), if there exist ε > 0 and a strategy fE ∈ B(E, A0), such that for every f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A0) : W (t, fE(t), µ(fE//f(cid:123)E)−1) > W (t, h(t), µh−1) + ε a.e. on E The weak-core of the game H is the set of strategies that are not blocked by any coalition E ∈ T +. 5 Remark 1. By removing ε from Definitions 1 and 2, we obtain naturally the adapted Au- mann's α-core [Aumann, 1961] and its corresponding blocking concept. Observe, trivially, in both cases that the weak-core contains the α−core. Definitions 1 and 2 assert that a coalition blocks a given strategy of the game if it possesses a strategy making almost all its members better off, at least by some ε > 0, regardless of the opponent coalition choices for strategy. Like any core concept, the weak-core describes stable situations in which no coalition has any incentive to form by playing a different strategy. Indeed, it cannot improve upon, relatively to the equilibrium strategy, the payoffs of almost all its members. Askoura [2011] studied a reduced form of the game H, where the payoffs do not depend on individual actions. Under the strategy profile f ∈ B(T, A0), it is assigned to each player t the payoff W (t, µf−1). Then, some topological regularity conditions and a concavity condition on the distribution argument of W ensured an existence result. In Section 5, we discuss the game H with some general payoffs. In the following section we focus on a reduced form of G with particular payoffs of the form U (t, f ) independent on individual actions3. We give further examples legitimating the introduction of the approximation "weak-core" and discussing the used assumptions. We expect that the weak-core of G may be empty for a general form of payoffs such as U (t, f (t), f ), under "reasonable" regularity conditions. However, we do not succeeded to provide a counter-example for the latter case. For the Nash equilibrium, there is an alternative formulation of a continuum game on characteristics achieved by Mas-Colell [1984] for games with continuous payoffs, mainly generalized for upper semi-continuous payoffs by Khan [1989]. Unfortunately, it appears that the α−core (weak-core) cannot comply with an analogous formulation in a straight- forward manner. 4 Payoff as a function of pure strategies In this section we consider the game G, where the payoff of each player is reduced to depend only on the strategy profile f ∈ B(T, A). That is, every player t receives the payoff U (t, f ). Without more specification when speaking about "blocking", we mean the blocking concept of Definition 1 with the reduced payoffs U (t, f ), for (t, f ) ∈ T × B(T, A). 3Note that the payoff form U (t, f ) does not generalize the form W (t, µf−1) if a concavity assumption is needed on the second argument of W and U . Indeed f (cid:55)→ W (t, µf−1) need not be concave in f if W (t,·) is concave, even if we endow the action space A0 with a convexity structure which is necessary before asking for the concavity of W (t, µf−1) in f . That is the results proved in [Askoura, 2011] and Theorem 1 of section 4 are different, because, each one uses a concavity assumption on the second argument of the payoffs. There is other differences related to the nature of the action spaces and the regularity assumptions on payoffs. 6 4.1 Existence result Let us introduce the following definition : Definition 3. Let F be a topological space. A family of functions : vγ : F → IR, γ ∈ Γ, is said to be equi-usc at x0 ∈ F , if for every ε > 0, there exists a neighborhood Vx0 of x0 in F , such that vγ(x) < vγ(x0) + ε,∀x ∈ Vx0,∀γ ∈ Γ. The family {vγ}γ∈Γ is said to be equi-usc (on F ) if it is equi-usc at every x ∈ F . We use the following conditions : (R1) for every f ∈ B(T, A), t (cid:55)→ U (t, f ) is measurable, and there exists a µ−integrable function ψ : T → IR+, such that U (t, f ) ≤ ψ(t), for every t ∈ T and every f ∈ B(T, A). (R2) for every t ∈ T, f (cid:55)→ U (t, f ) is concave and the set of utilities {U (t,·) : t ∈ T} is equi-usc on B(T, A). Theorem 1. Under (R1) and (R2), the weak-core of U is nonempty. Furthermore, an element of the weak-core is obtained as a limit of elements in weak-cores of appropriate finite games generated from U . Proof. Consider the set Π of finite collections of coalitions containing T . Each π ∈ Π, π = {Ei, i ∈ Iπ}, where Iπ is finite and one of the sets Ei = T . Ordered by inclusion, Π is a directed set. Let π = {Ei, i ∈ Iπ} be fixed in Π. Let Kj, j ∈ Jπ, be a finite family of pairwise disjoint measurable subsets of T of strictly positive measure, such that every Kj = T Ei, i ∈ Iπ, is an union (up to a µ-null set) of some sets Kj. Naturally, we have (cid:83) with the induced topology from τB(T,X). Denote Yπ = (cid:81) j∈Jπ up to a µ-null set. Considering section 2 (and the appendix), for each j ∈ Jπ, let Yj = B(Kj, A) endowed Yj endowed with the resulting product topology. Following the properties of τB(T,X), all the sets Yj, j ∈ Jπ, and Yπ are compact. For each y = (yj1, ..., yjJπ) ∈ Yπ corresponds a function hy : T → A defined up j∈Jπ to a µ-null set by : hy = yj1//yj2//...//yjJπ. (cid:40) yj(t), if t ∈ Kj, an arbitrary a ∈ A if t ∈ T \ (cid:83) Kj. j∈Jπ That is, hy(t) = Since the sets Kj, j ∈ Jπ, are pairwise disjoint, hy is well defined and obviously hy ∈ B(T, A). 7 For each j ∈ Jπ, define a function gj : Yπ → IR by : (cid:90) gj(y) = Kj U (t, hy) dµ(t),∀y ∈ Yπ. From the measurability and the boundedness assumption (R1), the functions gj are well defined and bounded. Kj = T up to a µ-null set, the functions gj do not depend on the values of hy Since (cid:83) defined arbitrarily on T \ (cid:83) j∈Jπ Kj. j∈Jπ Associate with π the finite normal form game : Gπ = (Jπ, Yπ,{gj : j ∈ Jπ}) where Jπ is the set of players, Yπ is the product of strategy spaces and gj is the payoff of the player j ∈ Jπ. Note that the functions gj are concave on Yπ. This follows from the concavity of the functions U (t,·), assumed in (R2) and the linearity of the canonical function y (cid:55)→ hy. Moreover, the functions gj are upper semi-continuous. Indeed, let {yω}ω∈Ω be a net in Yπ converging to y ∈ Yπ. Let us identify, by using the canonical map described above, the elements of Yπ with that of B(T, A) and show the upper semi-continuity of the functions gj on B(T, A) (see the property (P) in the appendix). Let ε > 0 be fixed. Using the equi-usc condition (assumed in (R2)), consider a neighbor- hood Vε(y) of y such that, U (t, y) + ε > U (t, y(cid:48)),∀t ∈ T,∀y(cid:48) ∈ Vε(y). Then there exists ω0 ∈ Ω such that, U (t, y) + ε > U (t, yw),∀t ∈ T,∀ω > ω0. It results that,(cid:90) It follows, Kj lim sup (cid:90) (cid:90) Kj (cid:90) U (t, yω) dµ < U (t, y) dµ + εµ(Kj),∀j ∈ Jπ,∀ω > ω0. U (t, yω) dµ ≤ ω Kj Kj U (t, y) dµ + εµ(Kj),∀j ∈ Jπ. U (t, yω) dµ ≤(cid:82) (cid:82) Since ε is fixed arbitrarily, we conclude that lim sup all j ∈ Jπ. Hence, the functions gj are upper semi-continuous. By the non-vacuity of the α-core theorem for games with a finite set of players [Scarf, 1971], and by observing that Scarf's non-vacuity theorem establishes the existence of elements in the weak-core for games with convex and compact strategy spaces which are subsets of U (t, y) dµ, for Kj Kj ω 8 Hausdorff topological vector spaces and usc bounded concave payoffs (see the appendix), Gπ has a nonempty weak-core. Let yπ in the weak-core of Gπ and denote simply hπ = hyπ the corresponding function in B(T, A). Since B(T, A) is compact for τB(T,X), the net hπ, π ∈ Π, has a convergent sub-net, denoted again hπ, π ∈ Π. Denote h the limit of this sub-net. Let us prove that h belongs to the weak-core of U . Assume the opposite. Then, there exists a coalition E ∈ B+(T ) that blocks h. From the equi-usc condition, E blocks all strategies in a neighborhood θ(h) of h by a same strategy. Indeed, there exist fE ∈ B(E, A) and ε > 0, such that for all f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), U (t, fE//f(cid:123)E) > U (t, h) + ε for a.e. t ∈ E. Using the equi-usc condition, there exists a neighborhood θ(h) of h such that U (t, h) + ε 2 > U (t, h(cid:48)),∀h(cid:48) ∈ θ(h),∀t ∈ T. Then, U (t, h) + ε > U (t, h(cid:48)) + It results that for all f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), for all h(cid:48) ∈ θ(h), ,∀h(cid:48) ∈ θ(h),∀t ∈ T. ε 2 U (t, fE//f(cid:123)E) > U (t, h(cid:48)) + , for a.e. t ∈ E. ε 2 Then, there exists π0 ∈ Π, such that for all f(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), U (t, fE//f(cid:123)E) > U (t, hπ) + , for a.e. t ∈ E,∀π ≥ π0. ε 2 Let π1 = {E, T} and consider π ∈ Π such that π > π1 and π > π0. Then, π1 ⊂ π. In the game Gπ, there is a subset of indices Jπ(E) ⊂ Jπ such that E = ∪ Kj up to a µ-null set, where the sets Kj, j ∈ Jπ, are obtained as above relatively to the present game Gπ. Put for every j ∈ Jπ(E), xj = fEKj . Denote xL = (xj)j∈L, for every L ⊂ Jπ. Hence, for every xJπ\Jπ(E) ∈ YJπ\Jπ(E), the restriction of h(xJπ (E),xJπ\Jπ (E)) to E is equal to fE up to a µ-null set. It results that, for all xJπ\Jπ(E) ∈ YJπ\Jπ(E) and all j ∈ Jπ(E), j∈Jπ(E) gj(xJπ(E), xJπ\Jπ(E)) =(cid:82) U (t, fE//hxJπ\Jπ (E)) dµ(t) >(cid:82) Kj U (t, hπ) dµ(t)+δ = gj(yπ)+δ. µ(Kj)], and yπ ∈ Yπ corresponds to hπ as explained above and Where δ ∈]0; hxJπ\Jπ (E) is the function whose restriction to every Kj, j ∈ Jπ \ Jπ(E), equals xj. This means that the coalition Jπ(E) blocks yπ for the weak-core blocking concept. This is a contradiction since yπ belongs to the weak-core of Gπ. This ends the proof. ε 2 min j∈Jπ(E) Kj Proposition 1. The condition of equi-upper-semicontinuity of U on strategies and the measurability of U (·, f ), for every f ∈ B(T, A), are satisfied if T is a compact topological space endowed with its Borel σ−algebra, and U is jointly usc and continuous in t. 9 Proof. The measurability of U (·, f ), for every f ∈ B(T, A), results obviously from the continuity of U in t. Let us prove the equi-usc property. Let ε > 0 and f ∈ B(T, A). Using the continuity of U with respect to t, we can find for every t ∈ T a neighborhood V 1 f (t) such that, U (t(cid:48), f ) + ε > U (t, f ) + ,∀t(cid:48) ∈ V 1 f (t). ε 2 From the upper semi-continuity of U on its domain, we can find for every t ∈ T a neigh- borhood V 2 f (t) of t and a neighborhood Vt(f ) of f such that, U (t, f ) + > U (t(cid:48), f(cid:48)),∀(t(cid:48), f(cid:48)) ∈ V 2 f (t) × Vt(f ). ε 2 Taking Vf (t) = V 1 f (t) ∩ V 2 f (t), we obtain, U (t(cid:48), f ) + ε > U (t, f ) + > U (t(cid:48), f(cid:48)),∀(t(cid:48), f(cid:48)) ∈ Vf (t) × Vt(f ). ε 2 When t ranges T we obtain a cover Vf (t), t ∈ T , of T with the corresponding neighborhoods Vt(f ) of f . Since T is compact, we can extract a finite sub-cover Vf (ti), i in a finite set I. Put V (f ) = ∩ Vti(f ). Then, for every t(cid:48) ∈ T, there exists an index i such that t(cid:48) ∈ Vf (ti). i∈I Then, for every f(cid:48) ∈ V (f ), U (t(cid:48), f ) + ε > U (ti, f ) + ε 2 > U (t(cid:48), f(cid:48)),∀f(cid:48) ∈ V (f ). We have constructed a neighborhood V (f ) of f such that, U (t, f ) + ε > U (t, f(cid:48)),∀f(cid:48) ∈ V (f ),∀t ∈ T. (2) 4.2 The equi-usc hypothesis and the necessity of the approxima- tion of the α-core In this section, we provide two examples. The first one shows that Theorem 1 may fail if the equi-usc condition of U on strategies is relaxed. The second, shows that there may be situations in which all our regularity conditions are satisfied and the α-core is empty. Then, this example legitimizes the approximation of the α-core. Before stating the examples, let us begin with the common used constructions. In this section, fix T = [0, 1] and A = [0, 1]. Consider the Borel σ-algebra on T and set the previous probability µ to be the Lebesgue measure λ which is a probability on [0, 1]. We deal here with the particular case of X = IR. Take B(T, A) ⊂ L∞(T ) endowed with the weak∗ topology. Section 6.2, of the appendix, ensures all topological needs on the spaces. Precisely, the Bochner integral reduces to the Lebesgue integral and Condition (C) is satisfied. Note that B(T, A) is metrizable for the weak∗ topology, because L1(T ) is separable. 10 Let Γ :]0, 1] × L∞(T ) → IR, defined for every (t, f ) ∈]0, 1] × L∞(T ) by : (cid:82) t t Γ(t, f ) = 0 f dλ . Then, for every t ∈]0, 1], the function f (cid:55)→ Γ(t, f ) is linear and continuous on L∞(T ). It can be represented by an element of L1(T ) in the corresponding duality. That is, ∞(T ). Moreover, Γ is continuous on ]0, 1] × B(T, A), as it is Γ(t,·) = obviously sequentially continuous on the metrizable space ]0, 1] × B(T, A). Define a second function G on ]0, 1] × B(T, A), by : ∈ L1(T ) ⊂ L∗ χ[0,t] t G(t, f ) = sup s∈]0,t] Γ(s, f ) for every (t, f ) ∈]0, 1] × B(T, A). Then, G is jointly lsc, convex in f and continuous in t. Indeed, it is clear that G is convex in f as a supremum of linear functions. Let us prove that it is jointly lsc. Fix t0 ∈]0, 1], f0 ∈ B(T, A) and α ∈ IR such that G(t0, f0) > α. Let α1 ∈ IR such that G(t0, f0) > α1 > α. From the definition of G and the continuity of Γ on ]0, 1]×B(T, A), there is t1 ∈]0, t0[ such that G(t0, f0) < Γ(t1, f0)+α1−α. Using the continuity of Γ again, we can find, on B(T, A), a neighborhood V (f0) of f0, such that for all f(cid:48) ∈ V (f0), Γ(t1, f(cid:48)) > G(t0, f0) − (α1 − α) > α1 − (α1 − α) = α. Then, for every f(cid:48) ∈ V (f0), for every t ∈]t1, 1], sup s∈]0,t] neighborhood V (t0) =]t1, 1] of t0 and a neighborhood V (f0) of f0 having just defined, such that, for every (t, f ) ∈ V (t0) × V (f0), Γ(s, f(cid:48)) > α. That is, there exists a G(t, f ) > α. This means that G is jointly lsc. It remains to prove that G is continuous with respect to t. Let f ∈ B(T, A) be fixed. Since G is jointly lsc, it suffices to prove that G(·, f ) is usc. Let t0 ∈]0, 1] and α > 0 such that G(t0, f ) < α. If t0 = 1, there is nothing to do, because this implies G(t(cid:48), f ) < α, for all t(cid:48) ∈]0, 1]. Else, let α1 > 0 such that G(t0, f ) = sup Γ(s, f ) < α1 < α. Since Γ is continuous in t, there exists a neighborhood s∈]0,t0] V (t0) of t0 such that, Γ(t(cid:48), f ) < α1, for all t(cid:48) ∈ V (t0). Then, Γ(s, f ) ≤ α1 < α. Γ(s, f ) ≤ α1. Hence, sup s∈V (t0) sup s∈]0,t0]∪V (t0) Choosing V (t0) to be an open interval centered at t0, we obtain, for every t(cid:48) ∈ V (t0), G(t(cid:48), f ) < α. 11 Then G(·, f ) is usc. The following example shows how the equi-usc of U on strategies is crucial in Theorem 1. Example 1. The payoff function U is defined as follows : 1 − t t Γ(t, f ), (1 − G(t, f )) U (t, f ) = for t = 0. (cid:26) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) min 1 (cid:27) if t > 0, The function U has the following properties : () U is bounded, jointly usc on [0, 1]× B(T, A) and concave with respect to its variable f . t 1 − t t Before proving (), note that U satisfies the conditions of Theorem 1 except the equi-usc condition of {U (t,·), t ∈ T} at f ≡ 0. In fact, since U (·, f ) is usc, it is measurable, the boundedness property completes (R1). The concavity assumption stated in (R2) is expressly mentioned in (). Let us prove (). It is clear that U (T × B(T, A)) ⊂ [0, 1]. The function G is lsc on ]0, 1] × B(T, A). Then, (t, f ) (cid:55)→ 1 − G(t, f ) is usc on ]0, 1] × B(T, A). Since t (cid:55)→ 1 − t is positive and continuous on ]0, 1], we can easily verify that (1−G(t, f )) is usc on ]0, 1]×B(T, A). Since G is convex in f for every fixed t ∈]0, 1], the function (1− G(t, f )) is concave in f for every fixed t ∈]0, 1]. Whereas, Γ(t, f ) is linear in f and continuous on ]0, 1]×B(T, A). It results that U , as a minimum among these two functions, is usc on ]0, 1] × B(T, A) and concave in f for every t ∈]0, 1]. For t = 0, U is constant in f , then concave as well. Observe now that for every t ∈]0, 1] and every f ∈ B(T, A), U (t, f ) ∈ [0, 1]. Then if (tn, fn) is a sequence in ]0, 1]×B(T, A) converging to (0, f ), necessarily lim sup U (tn, fn) ≤ 1 = U (0, f ). Hence, U is also usc at every point of the form (0, f ), f ∈ B(T, A). At this step we proved that U satisfies all the properties listed in (). Let us prove now that the weak-core of U is empty. Let f such that lim sup Γ(t, f ) = 1. Let us show that such a strategy cannot be in the Γ(t, f ) = 1, for every t ∈]0, 1], G(t, f ) = 1. 1 − t t weak-core. Indeed, with the assumption lim sup It results that U (t, f ) = 0 for every t ∈]0, 1]. If the coalition E =]0, 1/2] plays hE ≡ 1 , we 1 − t 2 and [1 − G(t, hE//h(cid:123)E)] ≥ 1 1 obtain, Γ(t, hE//h(cid:123)E) = G(t, hE//h(cid:123)E) = 2 2 t for every h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A) and every t ∈]0, 1/2]. Then, E blocks f . Γ(t, f ) < 1. Then, there exist t0 ∈]0, 1] and Now, let f ∈ B(T, A) such that lim sup t→0 α ∈]0, 1[, such that Γ(t, f ) < α for every t ∈]0, t0]. Then, for every t ∈]0, t0], U (t, f ) < α. Let t1 ∈]0, t0] such that 1 − t1 > α. Consider the coalition E =]0, t1] with its strategy hE ≡ 1 − t1. Then, for every t ∈]0, t1] and every h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), 1 − t t t→0 t→0 = 1 2 . n , 12 Γ(t, hE//h(cid:123)E) = G(t, hE//h(cid:123)E) = 1 − t1 and (1 − G(t, hE//h(cid:123)E)) = t1 = 1 − t t 1 − t t .(1 − t) ≥ 1 − t ≥ 1 − t1 t1 t That is, for every t ∈]0, t1] and every h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), U (t, hE//h(cid:123)E) = 1−t1 > α > U (t, f ). This can be rewritten as : for every t ∈]0, t1] and every h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), U (t, hE//h(cid:123)E) > U (t, f ) + (1 − t1) − α. Which means that E blocks f . From the foregoing, we can state that the weak-core of U is empty. The following example establishes that the weak-core may be strictly larger than the α-core. Example 2. Here, U is defined as : (cid:26)(cid:90) t (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) min 0 f dλ, (1 − G(t, f )) 0 for t = 0. (cid:27) 1 − t t if t > 0, U (t, f ) = U satisfies all the properties : () U is bounded, jointly usc on [0, 1] × B(T, A), concave with respect to its variable f , for every fixed t ∈ [0, 1], and continuous in t, for every fixed f ∈ B(T, A). Before proving (), observe, using proposition 1, that it implies all the conditions of theorem 1. It is clear that U (T × B(T, A)) ⊂ [0, 1]. Analogously to the previous example, we obtain easily that U is jointly usc on ]0, 1] × B(T, A) and U (t,·) is concave on B(T, A) for every fixed t ∈ [0, 1]. Since for every fixed f ∈ B(T, A), G(·, f ) is continuous on ]0, 1], it is clear that U (·, f ) is continuous on ]0, 1] for every fixed f ∈ B(T, A). To achieve the verification of (*), it suffices to prove the continuity of U at (0, f ), for every f ∈ B(T, A). In fact, if (cid:82) tn U (tn, fn) ≤ (tn, fn) is a sequence in ]0, 1]× B(T, A) converging to (0, f ), necessarily lim sup 0 fn dλ = 0 = U (0, f ). Since U (t, h) ≥ 0, for every (t, h) ∈ [0, 1] × B(T, A), lim sup n n necessarily lim n U (tn, fn) = 0 = U (0, f ). Thus, U is continuous at (0, f ). Let us prove now that the α-core of U is empty. As in the previous example, an element f ∈ B(T, A) such that lim sup Γ(t, f ) = 1 cannot be in the α-core. For such element f , we t→0 have necessarily U (t, f ) = 0 for every t ∈]0, 1]. If the coalition E =]0, 1/2] plays hE ≡ 1 2 we obtain, for every h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A) and every t ∈]0, 1/2], , (cid:90) t 0 hE//h(cid:123)E dλ = and [1 − G(t, hE//h(cid:123)E)] t 2 1 − t t = 1 − t t 1 2 . ≥ 1 2 13 Then, E blocks f for the α-core blocking concept. Let f ∈ B(T, A) such lim sup t→0 Γ(t, f ) < α for every t ∈]0, t0]. Then, for every t ∈]0, t0], G(t, f ) ≤ α. That is, Γ(t, f ) < 1. Take t0 ∈]0, 1/2] and α ∈]0, 1[, such that Since for all t ∈]0, t0], Γ(t, f ) = ∀t ∈]0, t0], (1 − G(t, f )) ≥ 1 − α 1 − t t (cid:82) t 0 f dλ t < α, (cid:90) t ∀t ∈]0, t0], f dλ < αt (3) (4) (5) (6) Let t1 ∈]0, t0] and α1 > 0 such that, 0 αt < α1 < 1 − α,∀t ∈]0, t1] Then, taking into account (3) and (4), ∀t ∈]0, t1], U (t, f ) = f dλ < αt (cid:90) t 0 From this step, it is easy to provide, as in the previous example, coalitions blocking f by constant strategies. We will see thereafter, that such coalitions may possess other type of blocking strategies. Since 0 f dλ < 1, for all t ∈]0, t0], necessarily < 0, for all t ∈]0, t0]. Hence, (cid:82) t 0 f − 1 dλ t (cid:82) t t (7) Let δ > 0 to be fixed later. We have for every t ∈]0, 1], Γ(t, f + δ(1 − f )) = Γ(t, f ) + Γ(t, δ(1 − f )). It results, for every t ∈]0, 1], 0 1 − f dλ > 0,∀t ∈]0, t0] (cid:90) t G(t, f + δ(1 − f )) ≤ G(t, f ) + G(t, δ(1 − f )). Furthermore, for every t ∈]0, 1], G(t, δ(1 − f )) = sup s∈]0,t] (cid:82) s 0 δ(1 − f ) dλ s (cid:82) s ≤ sup s∈]0,t] 0 δ dλ s = δ. Gathering the two previous equations, we see that for every t ∈]0, t0], G(t, f + δ(1 − f )) ≤ G(t, f ) + δ ≤ α + δ. Taking δ1 ∈]0, 1] such that 1 − α − δ1 > 0, we obtain for every δ ∈]0, δ1], ∀t ∈]0, t0], [1 − G(t, f + δ(1 − f ))] ≥ [1 − α − δ] ≥ 1 − α − δ. (8) 1 − t t 14 1 − t t Consider the coalition E =]0, t2], t2 ∈]0, t1] to be fixed later, and its strategies of the form hE(δ) = fE + δ(1 − fE). Remark first that such strategies are feasible for every δ ∈ [0, 1]. Observe now that G(t, hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E) = G(t, f + δ(1 − f )) for every δ > 0, t ∈ E and h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A). Then, from (8), for every δ ∈]0, δ1], t ∈ E and h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), In another hand, from (4), for every δ > 0 and t ∈ E, (cid:90) t [1 − G(t, hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E)] ≥ 1 − α − δ. 1 − t t (cid:90) t (cid:90) t hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E dλ = f dλ + δ (1 − f ) dλ ≤ αt + δt. 0 0 0 Choose according to (5), δ ∈]0, δ1] and t2 ∈]0, t1] such that, αt + δt < α1 < 1 − α − δ,∀t ∈]0, t2]. This equation together with (9), (10) and (6) provides, for all t ∈ E, and all h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A), (9) (10) (cid:90) t 0 (cid:90) t 0 (1 − f ) dλ. U (t, hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E) = hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E dλ = U (t, f ) + δ That is, using (7), U (t, hE(δ)//h(cid:123)E) > U (t, f ), for all t ∈ E and all h(cid:123)E ∈ B((cid:123)E, A). Which means that E blocks f with respect to the α-core blocking concept. We proved accordingly that the α-core of U is empty. However, all the assumptions of Theorem 1 are satisfied. Then, we can assert that the weak-core of U is nonempty. 5 Payoff as a function of distributions of strategies : counter-example to a general form of payoffs The question of non-vacuity of the weak-core (α-core) under conditions similar to that ensuring the Nash equilibrium arises naturally. In fact, for normal form games with a finite set of players, the regularity conditions guaranteeing the existence of Nash equilibrium and the α−core are of "similar" type4. We emphasize that we do not mean, in any way, any conceptual comparison between the Nash equilibrium and the α-core (weak-core). These concepts may be viewed as "antagonistic" from some economic and game theoretic view point. But, two mathematical problems (existence of these concepts) with similar solutions in a given situation, give raise naturally to the question of their technical comparison in a more general or different situation. 4More precisely, for the α−core, we require the convexity and the compactness of strategy spaces, the continuity and the quasi-concavity of payoffs. For Nash equilibrium, we juste weaken the quasi-concavity assumption, assuming it for each player payoff only on its own strategy space. For the α-core, the quasi- concavity of payoffs is assumed on the product of all players' strategy sets. 15 If we adopt the general payoff form W above, it is shown that a pure strategy Nash equilibrium for H exists iff together with some measurability condition, the action space A0 is countable [Khan and Sun, 1995, 2002, Khan et al., 1997], see Theorem 2 below. Example 3, below, proves that we cannot provide analogous results, even with more restrictive regularity conditions, for the weak-core, then for the α-core too, because the weak-core contains the α-core. In other words, this section provides some negative answer to the raised question. When restricting W to depend only on T × P(A0), an existence result of the weak-core is proved in [Askoura, 2011]. The example, thereafter, proves further that this result cannot be generalized directly by adding the player's action argument to the payoff functions. Before stating this example, let us recall that a pure strategy Nash equilibrium for the game H is a strategy profile f ∈ B(T, A0) satisfying : W (t, f (t), µf−1) = max a∈A0 W (t, a, µf−1) a.e. on T. In the sequel C(A0 × P(A0)) refers to the set of continuous real functions on A0 × P(A0) endowed with its sup-norm topology and the corresponding Borel σ-field. Recall that A0 is a compact metric space and P(A0) is the set of Borel probabilities on A0 endowed with its weak∗ topology. Consider the following version of a well known existence result of pure strategy Nash equilibrium : Theorem 2. Assume that W (t,·,·) is continuous for every t ∈ T . Then, the pure strategy Nash equilibrium for the game H exists under the following conditions : (a) the map t (cid:55)→ W (t,·,·) as a function from T into C(A0 × P(A0)) is measurable, (b) A0 is countable, (c) µ is an atomless probability measure. This theorem was obtained by Khan and Sun [1995]. It generalizes the seminal result of Schmeidler [1973], where among other A0 is assumed to be finite. If A0 is not countable, the pure strategy Nash equilibrium may fail to exist [Khan and Sun, 2002, Khan et al., 1997]. Note that we presented here a simplified version of the original result Theorem 10, page 650 in [Khan and Sun, 1995], where among other, the distribution argument of the payoffs is more general. In order to link our regularity conditions assumed on payoffs (Theorem 1 above and the main result in Askoura [2011]) to the measurability condition (a) of Theorem 2, let us re- mark that since A0×P(A0) is a compact metric space, (a) is satisfied if W is a Carath´eodory function. That is W (t,·,·) is continuous on A0 × P(A0), for every t ∈ T , and W (·, a, p) is measurable for every (a, p) ∈ A0 × P(A0) (Aliprantis and Border [2006], Theorem 4.55, p. 155). If T is a topological space endowed with its Borel σ−algebra and µ is a Borel probability, then, 16 • Condition (a) of Theorem 2 is satisfied if W is usc in t and jointly continuous in its second and third argument. Example 3. In this example, by the word "blocking" we mean the blocking concept of Definition 2. Let T = [0, 1] endowed with its Borel σ−algebra and the Lebesgue probability measure λ and A0 = {0, 1, 2, 3} ⊂ IR. P(A0) represents the set of probabilities on A0. Since A0 is finite, the variation norm topology on P(A0) coincides with the used weak (star) topology on P(A0). Let ε > 0 small enough and E1, E2, E3 three pairwise disjoint coalitions of [0, 1], such that λ(E1) = λ(E2) = λ(E3) = 1 − 2ε . 3 The sets Ei are represented in Figure 1 (in every sub-figure). Let : Put α = λ(Ei) = p0 ∈ P(A0) satisfying p0({0}) = 1. Put P0 = {p0}. 1 − 2ε . For all i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, define the set : Pi = {p ∈ P(A0) : p({i}) ≥ 2α}. 3 1 − 2ε Hence, the sets Pi, i ∈ {0, ..., 3}, are closed, convex and pairwise disjoint for 2α = 2 1 . Then, fix an arbitrary ε satisfying the previous requirement. 2 Define W : T × A0 ×P(A0) as depicted in figure 1 on elsewhere. Our final goal is not the game W , but in order to facilitate the forthcoming analysis, let us show that its weak-core is empty. First, we can remark that W possesses nice properties. In fact, it is easy to verify that : [0, 1]×{i}× Pi and W (t, a, p) ≡ 0 3(cid:83) i=0 > 3 • W is usc on its domain and W (·, a, p) is continuous for every (a, p) ∈ A0 × P(A0). Observe now the following values of W : (cid:26) 2 if t ∈ E1 ∪ E2,  4 if t ∈ E1, 0 if t ∈ E2, 1 if t ∈ E3 4 for t ∈ E3. ∀p ∈ P1, W (t, 1, p) = ∀p ∈ P3, W (t, 3, p) = (cid:26) 3 if t ∈ E1 ∪ E2,  0 if t ∈ E1, 0 ift ∈ E3. 1 if t ∈ E2, 2 if t ∈ E3. W (t, 0, p0) = ∀p ∈ P2, W (t, 2, p) = Let any strategy h ∈ B(T, A0). If λh−1 /∈ P0 ∪ P1 ∪ P2 ∪ P3, then W (t, h(t), λh−1) = 0, for every t ∈ T . Clearly T blocks h by playing fT ≡ 0 on T . In fact, fT provides the 17 Figure 1: Some values of W 18 payoffs of sub-figure (a). Now assume that h generates the payoffs of sub-figure (a), that is λh−1 = p0. Necessarily, h ≡ 0 (a.e.) and then E1 ∪ E2 blocks h by f1,2 ≡ 1 on E1 ∪ E2. In fact, for all f(cid:123)E1∪E2 ∈ B((cid:123)E1 ∪ E2, A0), λ(f1,2//f(cid:123)E1∪E2)−1({1}) ≥ 2α. Hence, E1 ∪ E2 will obtain the payoffs of sub-figure (b). Analogously, we can show easily that, E1 ∪ E3 blocks, by its strategy f1,3 ≡ 2, all strategy generating the payoffs of sub-figure (b). Thereby, E1 ∪ E3 can ensure for its members the payoffs represented in sub-figure (c). Now the coalition E2 ∪ E3 can ensure for its members the payoffs represented in sub-figure (d) by playing f2,3 ≡ 3 on E2∪ E3, doing this all strategy leading to the payoffs of sub-figure (c) is blocked. In turn, the coalition T blocks all strategies ensuring payoffs of sub-figure (d) by its strategy fT ≡ 0 on T . T obtains with the last blocking strategy the payoffs represented in sub-figure (a). Henceforth, we conclude that the weak-core (and then the α−core) of the game W is empty. 3(cid:83) i=0 Emptiness of the weak-core under the continuity of payoffs and their concavity with resect to the distribution argument : [0, 1] × {i} × Pi and consider the function(cid:102)W on [0, 1] × Let W defined as in figure 1 on A0 × P(A0) defined as follows :(cid:102)W (t, a, p) = W (t, a, Pa) Let a be fixed. Since, by construction, W (·, a, Pa) is continuous, the continuity of (cid:102)W on T × {a} × P(A0) results obviously from the extension formula. Then,(cid:102)W is continuous on where D stands for the minimum among d(Pi, Pj), i (cid:54)= j. The metric d is that induced by the variation norm. Since the sets Pi are convex compact and pairwise disjoint, D is strictly positive. We do not need the exact value of D. − d(p, Pa) (cid:18) D (cid:19) 2 its domain. It is easy to check, using the convexity of the sets Pa, a ∈ A0, that for every a ∈ A0, the function p (cid:55)→ d(p, Pa) is convex. If follows that (cid:18) D (cid:19) p (cid:55)→ W (t, a, Pa) − d(p, Pa) 2 is concave for every t and every a. Hence(cid:102)W (t, a,·) is concave for every t and every a. Emptiness of the weak-core of (cid:102)W . Let a strategy h ∈ B(T, A0) be fixed. Put p = λh−1. Two cases can occur : 1) Firstly, every a ∈ A0 satisfies d(p, Pa) ≥ D 2 0. Hence, (cid:102)W (t, h(t), p) = W (t, h(t), Ph(t))( . In this case, for a.e. t ∈ T , D 2 −d(p, Ph(t)) ≤ − d(p, Ph(t))) ≤ 0. As previously, many 0 = p0 coalitions block h. For instance, T blocks h, by playing f0(t) ≡ 0. In fact, λf−1 D 2 19 and for a.e. t ∈ T , d(p0, Pf0(t)) = d(p0, P0) = 0, hence every t ∈ T receives (cid:102)W (t, 0, p0) = W (t, 0, p0) D 2 . 2) Secondly, there is i0 ∈ A0 such that d(p, Pi0) ≤ D 2 d(p, Pa) ≥ D 2 payoff of a player t playing i0 is : . In this case, for all a ∈ A0 \ {i0}, . Hence, the payoff of all player playing h(t) (cid:54)= i0 is negative or null, and the (cid:102)W (t, i0, p) = W (t, i0, Pi0)( D 2 − d(p, Pi0)) ≤ W (t, i0, Pi0) D 2 . It follows that for all t ∈ T ,(cid:102)W (t, h(t), µh−1) ≤ W (t, i0, Pi0) D 2 . D 2 f1,3 ≡ 2 on E1 ∪ E3, the payoff W (t, 2, P2) But, in the game W , as we seen previously, following the value of i0, either the coalition T or an union of two coalitions among {E1, E2, E3} blocks any strategy generating the (cid:102)W . For example, if i0 = 1, then, E1 ∪ E3 can ensure for all its member t, by playing payoffs W (·, i0, Pi0). Such a coalition blocks also h for the continuous game defined by and for all t ∈ E1 ∪ E3 and every f(cid:123)E1∪E3 ∈ B((cid:123)E1 ∪ E3, A0),(cid:102)W (t, f1,3(t), λ(f1,3//f(cid:123)E1∪E3)−1) = W (t, 2, P2) D We deduce that the weak-core of the game defined by(cid:102)W is empty. Observe however that (cid:102)W satisfies all conditions of Theorem 2, then we know that the set of pure strategy Nash equilibria of(cid:102)W is non-empty. Remark 2. The payoffs (cid:102)W constructed in the previous example satisfy nicer properties than that required for Nash equilibrium in Theorem 2 above. In fact, (cid:102)W is continuous on games, these properties of(cid:102)W may be intuitively expected to guarantee the non vacuity of the its domain and concave with respect to its distribution argument. Regarding Section 4, the existence result in [Askoura, 2011], and the classical Scarf 's existence result for finite ≥(cid:102)W (t, h(t), µh−1) + D ≥ (W (t, 1, P1) + 1) D 2 2 2 . weak-core. Nevertheless, this example shows that they do not suffice or they are irrelevant in the present case. Acknowledgments The author is very grateful to an anonymous referee for his relevant comments. 20 6 Appendix In this section we give some mathematical considerations as a technical extension of section 2. 6.1 Concatenating coalition strategies Ei up to a µ-null set. Let s : (cid:81) We used in this paper the following property of τB(T,X) (see section 2), which is satisfied by all linear topologies : (P) Let G : B(T, X) → IR be continuous (resp. upper semi-continuous) for τB(T,X). Let Ei ∈ B(T ), i in a finite set I = {1, ..., n} be a pairwise disjoint family such B(Ei, X) → B(T, X) defined by that T = ∪ i∈I s(f1, ..., fn) = f1//f2...//fn. Then G ◦ s is continuous (resp. upper semi-continuous). This results from the continuity of the operation "+" for vector topologies (see for instance [Schaefer, 1971]). Remark, in the last time, that we can replace, in (P), X by A. i∈I 6.2 Topologies satisfying Condition (C) In this section, most of used notions and results can be found in [Diestel and Uhl, 1977]. 1) Assume in this example that X is a separable reflexive Banach space. Let L∞(µ, X) (resp. L1(µ, X)) be the space of µ-measurable (strongly measurable) essentially bounded (resp. Bochner integrable) functions defined from T to X. Since X is a separable Banach space, it is hereditarily separable. Then Pettis's measurability theorem states that every scalarly (weakly) measurable function (then every Borel function) is µ-measurable, be- cause the range of every function taking its values in X is separable. Since µ−measurable functions are Borel, we have B(T, X) = L∞(µ, X). For these considerations, we do not distinguish, thereafter between these different notions of measurability. The finiteness of the measure µ yields L∞(µ, X) ⊂ L1(µ, X). Consider the embedding of B(T, X) in L1(µ, X). We show in the sequel that the weak topology σ(L1(µ, X), L∞(µ, X∗)) satisfies the condi- tion (C). We begin by verifying that (C) is satisfied for T . It is clear that B(T, A) is a closed subset of L1(µ, X). Indeed a norm convergent sequence of B(T, A) has an a.e. convergent subsequence, which provides that the limit is necessarily in B(T, A). Being a norm closed subset of L1(µ, X) and convex, B(T, A) is weakly closed in L1(µ, X) as well. Let us verify the weak compactness of B(T, A). Since A is bounded, (cid:107)a(cid:107). Hence, as µ is finite, B(T, A) is norm bounded in there is a constant M = sup a∈A L1(µ, X), and, lim µ(E)→0 sup f∈B(T,A) (cid:90) E (cid:107)f(cid:107) dµ ≤ lim µ(E)→0 M µ(E) = 0. 21 and E ∈ B(T ), (cid:82) Then, the set B(T, A) is uniformly integrable. Since A is convex, for every f ∈ B(T, A) E f dµ ∈ µ(E)A. That is, (cid:8)(cid:82) E f dµ : f ∈ B(T, A)(cid:9) is a subset of µ(E)A. Consequently, it is relatively compact, then relatively weakly compact too. As X is separable and reflexive, so is X∗. It follows that both X and X∗ have the Radon- Nikodym property. It results from the Dunford weak compactness criterion in L1(µ, X) (Diestel and Uhl [1977], p. 101) that B(T, A) is relatively weakly compact. Since this set is weakly closed in L1(µ, X), it is weakly compact. Instead of using the Dunford criterion, one can use compactness results in [Diestel, 1977, Ulger, 1991]. Verify the condition (C) for any Borel set. Let E ∈ B(T ). The set B(E, A) is identified (see section 2) to the subset {fE//0(cid:123)E : fE ∈ B(E, A)} of L1(µ, X). As doing it for T , we can observe that B(E, A) is weakly closed in L1(µ, X). Since B(E, A) ⊂ B(T, A), it is necessarily weakly compact. 2) Assume that X is a separable Hilbert space. Among properties of X, we have X∗ = X. We have already seen in example 1 that B(T, X) = L∞(µ, X). We assert that the weak∗ topology σ(L∞(µ, X), L1(µ, X)) satisfies the condition (C). Begin the verification of (C) on the set T . Let us verify, first, the weak∗ closure of B(T, A) in L∞(µ, X). Let for this aim g ∈ L∞(µ, X) \ B(T, A). Then, there exists a measurable subset E ∈ B(T ) of strictly positive measure, such that g(t) /∈ A, for all t ∈ E. For every a ∈ X \ A, let ε > 0 such that B(a, εa) ∩ A = ∅. Here, B(a, r) (resp. B(a, r)) stands for the closed (resp. open) ball of X of radius r ∈ IR+ centered at a. The set of obtained open balls B(a, εa), a ∈ X \ A, constitutes an open cover of X \ A. Since X is separable metric, it is hereditarily Lindelof. Then, we can extract, from the previous cover, a countable subcover B(ai, εi), i ∈ IN, of g−1(B(ai, εi)) and µ(E) > 0, there is necessarily an index i0 ∈ IN such that µ(g−1(B(ai0, εi0))) > 0. By the use of the Hahn-Banach separation theorem, let x∗ ∈ X∗ separating strictly B(ai0, εi0) and A. Since X is an Hilbert space, x∗ is represented by an element x ∈ X. Denote by (·,·) the scalar product of X. Then, there is α > 0 such that, X \ A. Since E ⊂ (cid:83) i∈IN (x, y) > α > (x, a),∀y ∈ B(ai0, εi0),∀a ∈ A. (cid:90) T (cid:90) T 22 Put Ei0 = g−1(B(ai0, εi0)) and χi0 its characteristic function. Then χi0x ∈ L1(µ, X) and, (χi0x, g) dµ > µ(Ei0)α > (χi0x, f ) dµ,∀f ∈ B(T, A). Hence the weak∗ open set {h ∈ L∞(µ, X) : (χi0x, h) > µ(Ei0)α} contains g and does not intersect B(T, A), which means that B(T, A) is weak∗ closed in L∞(µ, X). Since B(T, A) is bounded for the esssup-norm in L∞(µ, X), it results, from the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem, that B(T, A) is weak∗ compact in L∞(µ, X). Verify (C) for an arbitrary Borel sets. Let E ∈ B(T ) and denote L1(µE, X) (resp. L∞(µE, X)) the set all Bochner integrable (resp. µ−measurable essentially bounded) func- tions defined from E to X. µE stands for the induced measure on E. By extending, as in Section 2, all the functions in L1(µE, X) (resp. L∞(µE, X)) by 0 on (cid:123)E, L1(µE, X) (resp. L∞(µE, X)) can be seen as a subspace of L1(µ, X) (resp. L∞(µ, X)). By the same notations and a similar reasoning we have B(E, X) = L∞(µE, X). As above we obtain easily that B(E, A) is weak∗ compact in L∞(µE, X). Remark in the last time that the function fE (cid:55)→ fE//0(cid:123)E is continuous from L∞(µE, X) to L∞(µ, X) both of them endowed with its weak∗ topology. It results that B(E, A) is compact for the induced topology on L∞(µE, X) from σ(L∞(µ, X), L1(µ, X)). 6.3 The weak-core for usc payoffs in infinite dimension. Thereafter, we give the modifications to operate in the Scarf non-vacuity result [Scarf, 1971] in order to handle infinite dimensional strategy spaces and bounded usc quasi-concave payoffs to prove the non-vacuity of the weak-core for a game with a finite set of players: the assumptions listed in the proof of Theorem 1. Let N = {1, ..., n}. For every i ∈ N , consider (C1) Xi a convex compact subset of a Hausdorff topological vector space. Put X = (cid:81) Xi. Let S ⊂ N . XS stands for the product (cid:81) i∈N XS and −S = N \ S. For every i ∈ N , (C2) ui : X → IR is upper semi-continuous, quasi-concave and bounded from below. Consider the game : Xi, vS refers to an element of i∈S G = (N, X,{ui, i ∈ N}) Scarf [1971] showed that G has a nonempty α-core by assuming that the functions ui are quasi-concave and continuous, the sets Xi are convex compact subsets of finite dimensional Euclidean spaces. However, his proof remains valid under the weaker conditions (C1) and (C2) above to prove the existence of the weak-core. Indeed, Scarf proves that the characteristic function form game Gc, defined below, has a nonempty core and to each element in the core of Gc corresponds an element in the α-core of G in case of continuous payoffs. For ucs payoffs, we show at the end that the weak-core remains nonempty. The associated characteristic function form game is defined by : where, for every nonempty S ⊂ N , Gc = (N, V ), V (S) = {y ∈ IRN ,∃vS ∈ XS, ui(vS, v−S) ≥ yi,∀v−S ∈ X−S,∀i ∈ S} In order to have a nonempty core (elements of V (N ) not belonging to the interior of V (S) for any S ⊂ N ), the game Gc needs to satisfy : (a) for every S ⊂ N , V (S) is closed and nonempty, (b) for every S ⊂ N , if y ∈ V (S) and y(cid:48) ∈ IRN satisfies y(cid:48) i ≤ yi for every i ∈ N , then y(cid:48) ∈ V (S), 23 (c) V (N ) is bounded from above. (d) Gc is balanced. Prove that Gc satisfy (a)-(c) under the assumptions (C1) and (C2). The condition (b) is obviously satisfied and (c) results from the upper semicontinuity of the functions ui, i ∈ N , and the compactness of X. Let us prove (a). Fix S ⊂ N . The non-emptiness of VS results from boundedness of ui, i ∈ N . Remark that y ∈ V (S) if and only if there exists vS ∈ XS, such that ui(vS, v−S) − yi ≥ 0, for all i ∈ S, for all v−S ∈ X−S. That is, y ∈ V (S) ⇔ ∃vS ∈ XS, inf v−S∈X−S min i∈S {ui(vS, v−S) − yi} ≥ 0 Define the function H : XS × IRN by : H(vS, y) = inf v−S∈X−S min i∈S {ui(vS, v−S) − yi} Then, y ∈ V (S) ⇔ ∃vS ∈ XS, H(vS, y) ≥ 0 S, n ∈ IN, a corresponding sequence in XS satisfying H(vn It is clear that H is upper semicontinuous. Let yn, n ∈ IN, be a sequence of V (S) converging S, yn) ≥ 0, for every to y. Let vn n ∈ IN. }w∈W Since XS is compact, as a net, {vn and let vS be its limit. Then, the sub-net {yη(w)}w∈W of {yn}n∈IN converges to y and the net {(vη(w) , yη(w))}w∈W converges to (vS, y) in the product XS × IRS. It follows : S}n∈IN has a convergent sub-net, denote it {vη(w) S S H(vS, y) ≥ lim sup w∈W H(vη(w) S , yη(w)) ≥ 0 Which means y ∈ V (S) and then, V (S) is closed. The remaining arguments of Scarf need not be rewritten. They are also true under our assumptions. For instance, the arguments showing the balancedness of the game Gc (con- dition (d)) do not require topological considerations, they work with only convexity as- sumptions taken into account by the quasi-concavity of the functions ui. Now, take y in the core of Gc and let ¯v ∈ X such that ui(¯v) ≥ yi, for all i ∈ N . Then, ¯v is an element of the weak-core of G. Otherwise, there is S blocking ¯v with some vS ∈ XS. Then, there exists ε > 0 such that, ui(vs, v−S) > ui(¯v) + ε ≥ yi + ε,∀v−S ∈ X−S,∀i ∈ S. Hence, y belongs to the interior of V (S). Note that the parameter ε is needed in the previous formula to conclude that y is in the interior of V (S), since the upper semi-continuity cannot guarantee, for instance, that inf v−S ui(vs, v−S) > yi for every i ∈ S, and the large inequality do not support the needed conclusion in order to provide a contradiction. Observe that for continuous payoffs, the weak-core coincides with the α−core. 24 References CD Aliprantis and KC Border. Infinite Dimensional Analysis : A hitchhiker's guide (3rd Edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. RM Anderson. Strong core theorems with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica, 53:1283 -- 1294, 1985. Y Askoura. The weak-core of a game in normal form with a continuum of players. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47:43 -- 47, 2011. Y Askoura. An interim core for normal form games and exchange economies with incom- plete information. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 58:38 -- 45, 2015. Y Askoura, M Sbihi, and H Tikobaini. The ex ante alpha-core for finite games with uncetainty. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49:157 -- 162, 2013. RJ Aumann. The core of a cooperative game without side payments. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 98:539 -- 552, 1961. RJ Aumann. Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica, 32:39 -- 50, 1964. RJ Aumann. Existence of competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica, 34:1 -- 17, 1966. EJ Balder. A unifying approach to existence of nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory, 24:79 -- 94, 1995. EJ Balder. On the existence of cournot-nash equilibria in continuum games. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 32:207 -- 223, 1999. J Diestel. Remarks on weak compactness in L1(µ, X). Glasgow Mathematical Journal, 18: 87 -- 91, 1977. J Diestel and JJ Uhl. Vector measures. Mathematical Surveys 15, American Mathematical Society, 1977. S Hart, W Hildenbrand, and E Kohlberg. On equilibrium allocations as distributions on the commodity space. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1:159 -- 166, 1974. W Hildenbrand. The core of an economy with a measure space of economic agents. The Review of Economic Studies, 35:443 -- 452, 1968. W Hildenbrand. Core and equilibria of a large economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1974. W Hildenbrand, D Schmeidler, and S Zamir. Existence of approximate equilibria and cores. Econometrica, 41:1159 -- 1166, 1973. 25 T Ichiishi and S Weber. Some theorems on the core of a non-sidepayment game with a measure space of players. International Journal of Game Theory, 7:95 -- 112, 1978. A Kajii. A generalization of scarf's theorem : an α-core existence theorem without tran- sitivity or completeness. Journal of Economic Theory, 56:194 -- 205, 1992. M Kaneko and MH Wooders. The nonemptiness of the f-core of a game without side payments. International Journal of Game Theory, 25:245 -- 258, 1996. Y Kannai. Continuity properties of the core of a market. Econometrica, 38:791 -- 815, 1970. Y Kannai. Continuity properties of the core of a market : a correction. Econometrica, 40: 955 -- 958, 1972. MA Khan. Equilibrium points of nonatomic games over a nonreflexive Banach space. Journal of Approximation Theory, 43:370 -- 376, 1985. MA Khan. Equilibrium points of nonatomic games over a Banach space. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 293:737 -- 749, 1986. MA Khan. On cournot-nash equilibrium distributions for games with a nonmetrizable action space and upper semicontinuous payoffs. Transactions of the American Mathe- matical Society, 315:127 -- 146, 1989. MA Khan and Y Sun. Pure strategies in games with private information. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24:633 -- 653, 1995. MA Khan and Y Sun. Non-cooperative games with many players. In Hart S Aumann R, editor, Handbook of game theory with economic applications, 1st edn, Volume 3, pages 1761 -- 1808. Elsevier, Holland, 2002. MA Khan and A Yamazaki. On the cores of economies with indivisible commodities and a continuum of traders. Journal of Economic Theory, 24:218 -- 225, 1981. MA Khan, KP Rath, and Y Sun. On the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games with a continuum of players. Journal of Economic Theory, 76:13 -- 46, 1997. A Mas-Colell. A model of equilibrium with differentiated commodities. Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 2:263 -- 295, 1975. A Mas-Colell. On a theorem of schmeidler. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 13:201 -- 206, 1984. KP Rath. A direct proof of the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games with a continuum of players. Economic Theory, 2:427 -- 433, 1992. J Rosenmuller. Large games without side payments. Operations Research Verfahren, 20: 107 -- 128, 1975. 26 HE Scarf. On the existence of a cooperative solution for a general class of n-person games. Journal of Economic Theory, 3:169 -- 181, 1971. HH Schaefer. Topological vector spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York Heidelberg Berlin, 1971. D Schmeidler. Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. Journal of Statistical Physics, 7: 295 -- 300, 1973. LS Shapley and M Shubik. Quasi-core in a monetary economy with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica, 34:805 -- 828, 1966. RM Starr. Quasi-equilibria in markets with non-convex preferences. Econometrica, 37: 25 -- 38, 1969. A Ulger. Weak compactness in L1(µ, X). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 113:143 -- 149, 1991. M Uyanik. On the nonemptiness of the α−core of discontinuous games: Transferable and nontransferable utilities. Journal of Economic Theory, 158:213 -- 231, 2015. S Weber. On −core of balanced games. International Journal of Game Theory, 8:241 -- 250, 1979. S Weber. Some results on the weak core of a non-side-payment game with infinitely many players. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 8:101 -- 111, 1981. MH Wooders. The epsilon core of a large replica game. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 11:277 -- 300, 1983. MH Wooders. Large games and economies with effective small groups. In Sorin S Mertens JF, editor, Game-theoretic methods in general equilibrium analysis, pages 145 -- 206. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1994. MH Wooders. Small group effectiveness, per capita boundedness and nonemptiness of approximate cores. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44:888 -- 906, 2008. MH Wooders and WR Zame. Approximate cores of large games. Econometrica, 52:1327 -- 1350, 1984. 27
1907.07343	1	1907	2019-07-17T05:52:13	Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions to the Stochastic Bellman Equation with Unbounded Shock	[ "econ.TH" ]	In this paper we develop a general framework to analyze stochastic dynamic problems with unbounded utility functions and correlated and unbounded shocks. We obtain new results of the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Bellman equation through a general fixed point theorem that generalizes known results for Banach contractions and local contractions. We study an endogenous growth model as well as the Lucas asset pricing model in an exchange economy, significantly expanding their range of applicability.	econ.TH	econ	Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions to the Stochastic Bellman Equation with Unbounded Shock Juan Pablo Rinc´on-Zapatero1 1 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [email protected] This Version: February 7, 2019 Abstract In this paper we develop a general framework to analyze stochastic dynamic problems with unbounded utility functions and correlated and unbounded shocks. We obtain new results of the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Bellman equation through a general fixed point theorem that generalizes known results for Banach contractions and local contractions. We study an endogenous growth model as well as the Lucas asset pricing model in an exchange economy, significantly expanding their range of applicability. Keywords -- Stochastic dynamic programming, contraction mapping, Bellman equation, value function, endogenous growth, asset pricing model 1 Introduction Stochastic dynamic programming incorporates uncertain events into a suitable framework to help the decision-maker to design an optimal plan of action. A fruitful approach for showing the existence of optimal stationary plans is to prove that the dynamic programming equation admits a unique solution -- the value function -- in a suitable space of functions. See Blackwell (1965), Maitra (1968), Furukawa (1972), Bertsekas and Shreve (1978), Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989) or Hern´andez-Lerma and Lasserre (1999), where this problem is analyzed in detail. There is a huge literature that applies stochastic dy- namic programming to economics. Brock and Mirman (1972), Mirman and Zilcha (1975), Donaldson and Mehra (1983), Danthine and Donaldson (1981), Majumdar, Mitra and Nyarko (1989), Hopenhayn and Prescott (1992) or Mitra (1998) are only a few of the many relevant papers that have contributed to developing this field of research. Olson and Roy (2006) makes a review of the contributions to the stochastic optimal growth model. 1 However, only partial results have been developed so far about the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the dynamic programming equation with arbitrary utility functions and arbitrary shock spaces. A satisfactory theory of stochastic dynamic programming should include these cases. Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003, 2009) developed a method to deal with unbounded utility functions in deterministic problems, the so -- called local contraction approach, based on an ex- tension of the Banach contraction principle for function spaces whose topology is defined by a countable family of seminorms.1 The application of the method to the stochastic case is not straightforward if one wants to dispense with artificial bounds on the exogenous shocks. Usually, the stochastic dynamic programming theory imposes those bounds in the form of a compact shock space. This is for analytical convenience only.2 There are at least two problems when dealing both with unbounded utility functions and with an unbounded shock space. One of them is technical, related to the integrability of the functions involved and thus, to the correctness in the definition of the Bellman operator. A second prob- lem concerns the choice of a suitable family of seminorms (or pseudodistances) that preserves the monotonicity of the Bellman operator. The local contraction approach in the deterministic Bellman equation constructs a family of compact sets in the endogenous state space to define the seminorms, see Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003). When trying to imitate this in the stochastic Bellman equation for the exogenous state space of shocks, one faces the difficulty that the Bellman equation requires the computation of a conditional expectation. This is an averaging of a random variable on the whole exogenous space, breaking down the monotonicity properties of the Bellman operator. To overcome the difficulties, we work with an extended concept of contraction parameter(s) in the local contraction definition, to consider an operator that works on the whole family of semi- norms. Thus, in this framework, in addition to the selfmap for which we are interested in finding fixed points, there is a companion operator that, acting on the seminorms, plays the role of the contraction parameter of the former selfmap. See Definition 2.1 below. We state a fixed point theorem, Theorem 2.5, that applies to this more general framework and we show how it covers previous fixed point results, including the classical Banach ContractionTheorem -- and henceforth, the weighted norm approach in Boyd III (1990), or Becker and Boyd III (1997) -- as well as those based on local contractions, see e.g., Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003) and Martins da Rocha and Vailakis (2010). This idea is not new. Kozlov, Thim and Turesson (2010) developed a fixed point theorem in locally convex 1Hadzi´c and Stankovi´c (1969) is one of the first papers dealing with this extension. Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003), independently, introduced different hypotheses and ap- plied the results to the deterministic Bellman equation. Recent contributions of the local contraction concept to dynamic programming are Martins da Rocha and Vailakis (2010), Matkowski and Nowak (2011) and Balbus, Reffett and Wozny (2018). 2In general, this assumption is incompatible with modelling the Markov chain as a first order stochastic difference equation, even if the underlying i.i.d. shocks takes only finitely many values. Think, for instance, of the simple random walk. It takes every integer number with positive probability. Thus, its range can only be limited by imposing exogenous constraints, alien to the economic model, a limitation which will modify the "natural" solution and may distort its real implications. 2 spaces whose topology is given by a family of seminorms. However, the results obtained depend on the companion contraction parameter operator being linear. The proof in Kozlov, Thim and Turesson (2010), of the existence and uniqueness of fixed points, heavily exploits the linearity of the companion operator. This precludes the application of the results of this paper to the dynamic programming equation, as it genuinely demands a nonlinear companion contraction parameter operator, due to the presence of a maximization operation3 On the other hand, we simplify somewhat the hypotheses made on the companion operator and extend the result to the consideration of arbitrary pseudodistances -- and hence the topological space is not a locally convex space anymore -- , which could be useful for analyzing the unbounded from below case, and more importantly, we show how the dynamic program- ming equation fits well into this framework, attaining, to our knowledge, new existence and uniqueness results. The present paper devotes a good deal of efforts to isolating a suitable space of functions and a suitable family of seminorms where the approach explained above is successful. We find a suitable framework, where the averaging needed to compute the conditional expectation does not break down the monotonicity of the Bellman operator. The seminorms that we define combine the usual supremum norm in the endogenous variables, with an L1 norm in the exogenous variables, and construct a complete space of functions for dealing with the Bellman operator -- a Carath´eodory function space -- . The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 develops a fixed point theorem for operators acting on topological spaces whose topology is given by a family of pseudodistances that makes it Hausdorff and sequentially complete. The operators enjoy a contraction property, materialized in an associated operator acting on the family of pseudodistances, which plays the role of the contraction parameter in Banach's Contraction Theorem. Thus, the result generalizes Banach's Contraction Theorem and shows that the local contraction approach used in previous papers is a particular case of this more general framework. Section 3 applies the theorem to the stochastic dynamic programming equation for models with shocks driven by an exogenous Markov chain and with an unbounded shock space. We carefully choose the set of functions where the Bellman operator is defined and we provide a way to methodically construct the objects needed to apply the fixed point theorem developed in Section 2. We also show that the solution of the Bellman equation is the value function. In Section 4, we study a model of endogenous growth -- which encompasses the one sector optimal growth model -- , and the Lucas asset pricing model in an exchange economy, in all cases allowing for correlated and unbounded shocks. Section 5 establishes the conclusions of the paper, and give some tips for further research. Appendix A contains the proofs that are not in the main text, with the exception of the proofs regarding the completeness of the function space and seminorms we consider to analyze the dynamic programming equation, which are developed in Appendix B. Appendix C discusses the issue of continuity of the Markov operator appearing in the dynamic programming equation, giving sufficient conditions to establish continuity, and providing an example of non -- continuity. 3It is for this reason that we have to develop our own fixed point theorem, departing from the approach of Kozlov, Thim and Turesson (2010), as we cannot make use of an equality as its formula (4). Instead, we provide an alternative condition, summarized in our assumption (VI) below. 3 2 Local Contractions Let (E, D) be a topological space, where E is a set whose topology is generated by a saturated family of pseudometrics D = {da}a∈A, with A an arbitrary index set. Since the family D is saturated, the topology it generates is Hausdorff4. We suppose that (E, D) is sequentially complete: if {xn} is a sequence in E which is Cauchy with respect to all da ∈ D, that is, if da(xn, xm) → 0 as n, m → ∞, then there is x ∈ E such that da(xn, x) → 0 as n → ∞ for all a ∈ A. Given a sequentially complete subset F ⊆ E, we study the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point of a mapping T : F → E. Let RA be the set of functions d : A → R+ and let RA we consider the order it generates, that is, for two elements d, d′ ∈ RA d(a) ≤ d′(a) for all a ∈ A. The family D can be embedded into RA mapping a 7→ da(x, y) defines a function in RA given subset F ⊆ E, we let D(F ) be the set of functions in RA that is + be the non -- negative cone of RA. On this set +, we say that d ≤ d′ if and only if +, since that, for x, y ∈ E given, the +, that we denote dx,y(a) := da(x, y). In general, for a + which are generated by pairs x, y ∈ F , D(F ) := {d : A → R+ : d = dx,y for some x, y ∈ F }. Definition 2.1. Let F ⊆ E. The mapping T : F → E is an L-local contraction on F with contraction operator parameter L (COP, for short), if there are a set C ⊆ RA + such that D(F ) ⊆ C, and an operator L : C → RA +, such that da(T x, T y) ≤ (Ldx,y)(a), for all x, y ∈ F and for all a ∈ A. Note that the inequality above can be rewritten dT x,T y ≤ Ldx,y, that is, as an order relation in the space RA +. The definition of L -- contractions for mappings T : F −→ E, not imposing T : F −→ F , will facilitate the definition of the COP parameter L of the Bellman operator in Section 3. Of course, the property T : F −→ F is fundamental for Theorem 3.5 below, and will checked carefully in Section 3. The following two examples show that the operator L is a generalization of the concept of contrac- tion parameter of a (local) contraction mapping. Example 2.2 (Banach contractions). In the classical Banach's Theorem, E is dotted with a complete metric d, so the index set A is a singleton, D = {d}, and T is a contraction of constant parameter β, with 0 < β < 1: d(T x, T y) ≤ βd(x, y), for any x, y ∈ E. The COP is L = βI, where I is the identity map in R+. 4A pseudometric d : E × E → R+ is a function satisfying d(x, y) ≥ 0, d(x, x) = 0, d(x, y) = d(y, x) and d(x, z) ≤ d(x, y) + d(y, z) for any x, y, z ∈ E, but d(x, y) = 0 does not imply x = y. The family D of pseudometrics is saturated if da(x, y) = 0 for all a ∈ A, implies x = y. Sometimes, the pseudometrics are defined through seminorms pa, a ∈ A, by da(x, y) = pa(x − y), where now E is a real vector space. A seminorm is a function p : E → R+ that satisfies all the axioms to be a norm, except that p(x) = 0 does not imply that x is the null vector of E. If the family of seminorms is saturated, then the topology defined by the family is Hausdorff and the space and E is a locally convex space. See Willard (1970) for further details. 4 A generalization of the Banach contraction concept is provided in Wong (1968), where it is con- sidered T : E −→ E for which there is a function L : R+ −→ R+ satisfying d(T x, T y) ≤ L(d(x, y)), (2.1) for all x, y ∈ E. Note that our definition is an extension of this concept to topological spaces whose topology is given by a family of semidistances. Example 2.3 (k -- local contractions). Suppose that A = N is countable. In Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003, 2007), we introduced the concept of k -- local contraction in the study of the deterministic Bell- man and Koopmans equations, respectively. A k -- local contraction on F , k = 0, 1, 2, . . ., is a mapping T : F ⊆ E −→ E satisfying dj(T x, T y) ≤ βjdj+k(x, y) for some fixed sequence of numbers {βj}j∈N with 0 < βj < 1, and for all x, y ∈ F . If we let s = RN be the set of real sequences and s+ be the subset of s of nonnegative sequences, then the COP associated with T is the linear operator L : s+ −→ s+ acting on sequences given by L(d1, d2, . . . , dj, . . .) = (β1d1+k, β2d2+k, . . . , βjdj+k, . . .), where k ≥ 0 is fixed. Suppose that A = N is uncountable and let a mapping α : A −→ E such that for any a ∈ A, da ≤ dα(a). Martins da Rocha and Vailakis (2010) worked with the following generalization of the countable class above: T : E −→ E is an α-local contraction if there exists a function β : A −→ [0, 1) such that da(T x, T y) ≤ β(a)dα(a)(x, y). The COP L acts as follows: given a function d : A −→ R+, the image function is (Ld)(a) = β(a)d(α(a)), that is, a translation in the independent variable by α, and a multiplication by β. It turns out that L is also a linear mapping, as in the countable case above. In what follows, we use the standard notation for successive iterations of the operators T and L. For instance, L0 is the identity operator on C, L1 = L, and for t ≥ 2, Lt = L ◦ Lt−1. We impose to C, L and T the assumptions (I) to (VI) listed below. The assumptions (I) to (V) concern the behavior of L on the set C. Assumption (VI) links directly the operators T and L. (I) D(F ) ⊆ C. For all d, d′ ∈ C, the sum d + d′ ∈ C, and any bounded subset of C is countably chain complete5 Moreover, if d′ ∈ C, d ∈ RA + and d ≤ d′, then d ∈ C. (II) L0 = 0. (III) L is monotone: for all d, d′ ∈ C with d ≤ d′, Ld ≤ Ld′. 5A subset S ⊆ C is bounded with respect to the order inherited from RA if there is d′ ∈ C such that d ≤ d′ for all d ∈ S. The bounded subset S is countably chain complete if for any countably chain d1 ≤ d2 ≤ · · · dt ≤ · · · in S, supt∈N dt ∈ S. 5 (IV) L is subadditive: for any d, d′ ∈ C L(d + d′) ≤ Ld + Ld′. (V) L is upper semicontinuous sup-preserving6: for any bounded countably chain in C, d1 ≤ d2 ≤ · · · ≤ dt ≤ · · · , (VI) There are x0 ∈ F and r : 0 ∈ C with da(x0, T x0) ≤ r0(a) and L sup t dt ≤ sup t Ldt. for all a ∈ A. R0(a) := ∞Xt=0 Ltr0(a) < ∞, Since Ltr0 ∈ C, for all t = 0, 1, . . ., and the countable chain {r0, r0 + Lr0, . . . , r0 + Lr0 + · · · + Ltr0, · · · } is bounded in C by (VI), R0 is in C by assumption (I). For F ⊆ E, x0 ∈ F , and m ∈ RA +, let the set VF (x0, m) = {x ∈ F : da(x0, x) ≤ m(a), ∀a ∈ A}. When E is a metric space, that is, when A is a singleton, the pseudometric is a metric, and VF (x0, m) is simply the intersection with F of the closed ball centered at x0 and radius m. Lemma 2.4. Let T : F −→ F be an L-local contraction on F ⊆ E and let x0 ∈ F be such that (I) -- (VI) hold true for a suitable r0 ∈ C. Let R0 be defined as in (VI). Then (a) T : VF (x0, R0) −→ VF (x0, R0). (b) For any a ∈ A, limt→∞(LtR0)(a) = 0. The following result is a fixed point theorem for L-local contractions. Theorem 2.5. Let (E, D) be a Hausdorff and sequentially complete topological space. Let T : F → F be an L-local contraction on the sequentially complete subset F ⊆ E and let x0 ∈ F be such that (I) -- (VI) hold true. Then there is a unique fixed point x∗ ∈ VF (x0, R0) of T , which is the limit of any iterating sequence yt+1 = T yt, t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., where y0 = x ∈ VF (x0, R0) is arbitrary. Proof. Consider first the iterating sequence xt+1 = T xt, t = 0, 1, 2, . . . (that is, the initial seed is x0). By Lemma 2.4, xt is in VF (x0, R0) for any t = 0, 1, 2, . . .. Since T is an L-local contraction da(xt, xt+1) = da(T xt−1, T xt) ≤ Ldxt−1,xt(a) and by induction da(xt, xt+1) ≤ (Ltdx0,T x0)(a). Let r > s ≥ 1. Then by the triangle inequality extended to finite sums da(xs, xr+1) ≤ da(xt, xt+1) ≤ rXt=s rXt=s Ltdx0,T x0(a) ≤ R0(a) < ∞, (2.2) 6For instance, the sup-preserving property, L(supt dt) = supt Ldt, plays a prominent role in the Fixed Point Theorem of Kantorovich-Tarski. In our context, it can be weakened to a kind of upper semicontinuity. 6 for all a ∈ A. By the Cauchy criterion for series, da(xs, xr+1) tends to 0 as r, s → ∞. Since a is arbi- trary, the sequence {xt}∞ t=0 is Cauchy, hence it converges to some x∗ ∈ F , as F is sequentially complete. In fact, x∗ ∈ VF (x0, R0). To see this, note that for all a ∈ A, the mapping x 7→ da(x0, x) is triv- ially sequentially continuous in the topology generated by D, hence da(x0, x∗) = da(x0, limt→∞ xt) = limt→∞ da(x0, xt) ≤ R0(a) for any a ∈ A. Next, we prove that x∗ is a fixed point of T . By estimate t=s Ltdx0,T x0(a). Hence (2.2), letting r → ∞, da(xs, x∗) ≤P∞ Ldxs,x∗ N t=s Ltdx0,T x0(a) = supNPN (a) ≤ L(cid:16) sup NXt=s L(cid:16) NXt=s NXt=s Ltdx0,T x0(cid:17)(a) Ltdx0,T x0(cid:17)(a) Lt+1dx0,T x0(a), ≤ sup N ≤ sup N which tends to 0 as s → ∞, since R0 is finite. Hence Ldxs,x∗ line above is due to the monotonicity of L, the second line since L is upper sup-preserving, and the → 0 as s → ∞, for all a ∈ A. The first third one, since L is subadditive. Now, given that da(x∗, T x∗) ≤ da(xs+1, x∗) + da(xs+1, T x∗) ≤ da(xs+1, x∗) + Ldxs,x∗ (a) and that both summands tend to 0 as s → ∞, we conclude that x∗ = T x∗. To prove uniqueness, we argue by contradiction, supposing the existence of another fixed point x∗∗ ∈ VF (x0, R0). Then da(x∗, x∗∗) ≤ 2R0(a) for all a ∈ A, and hence da(x∗, x∗∗) = da(T tx∗, T tx∗∗) ≤ Ltdx∗,x∗∗ (a) ≤ 2LtR0(a), since L is both monotone and subadditive7. Taking the limit as t → ∞ and using Lemma 2.4, x∗ = x∗∗ is proven. Finally, let x ∈ VF (x0, R0) and let the iterating sequence yt+1 = T yt, for n = 0, 1, 2, . . . ,, with y0 = x. Observe that da(xt, yt) ≤ Ltdx0,x(a) ≤ 2LtR0(a) → 0 as n → ∞, by Lemma 2.4, so da(yt, x∗) ≤ da(xt, yt) + da(xt, x∗) tends to 0 as t → ∞. The next corollary provides conditions for the uniqueness of the fixed point in F and not only in VF (x0, R0). When T is indeed an L-local contraction on the whole E, this result provides global uniqueness of the fixed point on E. Theorem 2.6. Let (E, D) be a Hausdorff, sequentially complete space. Let T : F → F be an L-local contraction on the sequentially complete subset F ⊆ E and let x0 ∈ F be such that (I) -- (VI) hold true. Suppose that, for any x ∈ F , it is possible to choose r0 ∈ C satisfying (VI), such that x ∈ VF (x0, R0). Then there is a unique fixed point of T in F and convergence to the fixed point of successive iterations of T is attained from any x ∈ F . 7It is easy to prove that Lt is monotone and subadditive for any t. 7 Proof. By Theorem 2.5, T admits a unique fixed point x∗ in VF (x0, R0), where R0 =P∞ t=0 Ltr0, for any r0 ∈ C for which R0 is a convergent series. Suppose, by contradiction, that T admits another fixed point x∗∗ 6= x∗ in F . By assumption, there is r′ 0 is finite. Hence, x∗ = x∗∗. The convergence of iterating sequences is also an immediate consequence of Theorem 2.5. 0 ∈ C such that x∗∗ ∈ VF (x0, R′ 0 =P∞ 0), where R′ t=0 Ltr′ Next we establish a useful sufficient condition for (VI). Note that the Bellman operator satisfies the extra condition imposed on L. Proposition 2.7. Let (E, D) be a Hausdorff and sequentially complete topological space. Let T : F −→ F be an L -- local contraction on F ⊆ E, with COP L satisfying (I) to (V) and L(αd) ≤ αLd, for all d ∈ C, for all α ∈ [0, 1]. Let x0 ∈ F , for which there is t0 ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . .}, s ∈ C, and θ ∈ [0, 1) such that Lt0d0 ≤ s and Ls ≤ θs, (2.3) where d0(a) = da(x0, T x0). Then (VI) holds with r0 = d0. Proof. Note thatPt=t0 Pt0−1 t=0 Ltd0 +P∞ t=t0 Ltd0 ≤Pt0−1 1−θ s. Hence,P∞ t=0 Ltd0 = Ltd0 ≤ s + Ls + L2s + · · · ≤ (1 + θ + θ2 + · · · )s = 1 t=0 Ltd0 + 1 1−θ s is finite for all a ∈ A. 3 Stochastic Dynamic Programming and Bellman Equation Consider a dynamic programming model (X, Z, Γ, Q, U, β), where X × Z is the set of possible states of the system, Γ is a correspondence that assigns a nonempty set Γ(x, z) of feasible actions to each state (x, z) and Q is the transition function, which associates a conditional probability distribution Q(z, ·) on Z to each z ∈ Z. Hence, the law of motion is assumed to be a first-order Markov process, which could be degenerated, giving rise to a deterministic model. We will use indistinctly the notation Qz(·) = Q(z, ·); the function U is the one -- period return function, defined on the graph of Γ, Ω = {(x, y, z) : (x, y) ∈ X × Z, y ∈ Γ(x, z)}, and β is a discount factor. and a total discounted returnP∞ Starting at some state (x0, z0), the agent chooses an action x1 ∈ Γ(x0, z0), obtaining a return of U (x0, x1, z0) and the system moves to the next state (x1, z1), which is drawn according to the probability distribution Q(·z0). Iteration of this process yields a random sequence (x0, z0, x1, z1, . . .) t=0 βtU (xt, xt+1, zt). A history of length t is zt = (z0, z1, . . . , zt). Let Z t be the set of all histories of length t. A (feasible) plan π is a constant value π0 ∈ X and a sequence of measurable functions πt : Z t −→ X, such that πt(zt) ∈ Γ(πt−1(zt−1), zt), for all t = 1, 2, . . .. Denote by Π(x0, z0) the set of all feasible plans starting at the state (x0, z0). Any feasible plan π ∈ Π(x0, z0), along with the transition function Q, defines a distribution Pπ,(x0,z0) on all possible futures of the system {(xt, zt)}∞ t=1, as well as the expected total discounted utility u(π, x0, z0) = Eπ,(x0,z0) ∞Xt=0 βtU (xt, xt+1, zt)! . 8 The expectation Eπ,(x0,z0) is taken with respect to the distribution Pπ,(x0,z0). The problem is then to find a plan π ∈ Π(x0, z0) such that u(π, (x0, z0)) ≥ u(bπ, (x0, z0)) for all bπ ∈ Π(x0, z0), for all (x0, z0) ∈ X × Z. The value function of the problem is v(x0, z0) = supπ∈Π(x0,z0) u(π, (x0, z0)). Consider the functional equation corresponding to the above dynamic programming problem as stated in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989). For x ∈ X, z ∈ Z v(x, z) = max y∈Γ(x,z)(cid:26)U (x, y, z) + βZZ v(y, z′)Q(z, dz′)(cid:27) . (3.1) A solution of the Bellman equation satisfying additional assumptions is the value function of the infinite programming problem. This is the content of Theorem 3.5 below, whose proof needs the notion of the probability measure µt defined on the sequence space of shocks (Z t, Z t) for finite t = 1, 2, . . ., where (Z t, Z t) = (Z × · · · × Z, Z × · · · × Z) (t times). For any rectangle B = A1 × · · · × At ∈ Z t, µt is defined by µt(z0, B) =ZA1 . . .ZAt−1ZAt Qzt−1(dzt)Qzt−2(dzt−1) · · · Qz0(dz1), and by the Hahn Extension Theorems, µt(z0, ·) has a unique extension to a probability measure on all of Z t. We omit the details, that can be found in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), Section 8.2, whose presentation we follow closely. Defining the Bellman operator in a suitable function space E, such that for f ∈ E (T f )(x, z) = max y∈Γ(x,z)(cid:26)U (x, y, z) + βZZ f (y, z′)Q(z, dz′)(cid:27) , the Bellman functional equation (3.1) is a fixed point problem for T . This fixed point problem is com- pletely understood for the case where U is bounded. There are now also different approaches for some special cases for unbounded U . It is worth mentioning the constant returns to scale model and the log- arithmic and the quadratic parametric examples analyzed in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), pp. 270 -- 280, and the weighted norm approach in Boyd III (1990) and Hern´andez-Lerma and Lasserre (1999). One feature of all these approaches is that they consider a bounded (or compact) space of shocks, an assumption that we want to dispense with.8 Allow for a non -- compact shock space is impor- tant for a qualitative analysis of models, see for instance Binder and Pesaran (1999) and Stachurski (2002), and more recently, Ma and Stachurski (2017). We now impose the standing hypotheses. Most are taken from Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), but there are essential differences, as we admit an unbounded utility U and an unbounded shock space Z. 8The weighted norm approach presents some limitations, which are explained, for instance, in Remark 9 of Matkowski and Nowak (2011). This paper constitutes a first attempt to translate the approach initiated by Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003) for deterministic programs to the stochastic case. However, the results obtained do not cover a general model where shocks are driven by an exogenous transition probabil- ity. In fact, in the class of dynamic programming models described here and in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), assumption (A4) on the generation of shocks {zt}∞ t=0 imposed in Matkowski and Nowak (2011), basi- cally implies that the space of shocks Z is compact, or that the underlying probability has compact support. 9 (B1) X ⊆ Rl, Z ⊆ Rk are Borel sets, with Borel σ-algebra X and Z, respectively. The set X is endowed with the Euclidean topology. (B2) 0 < β < 1. (B3) Q : Z × Z → [0, 1] satisfies (a) for each z ∈ Z, Q(z, ·) is a probability measure on (Z, Z); and (b) for each B ∈ Z, Q(·, B) is a Borel measurable function. (B4) The correspondence Γ : X × Z −→ X is nonempty, compact-valued and continuous. (B5) U : Ω −→ R is a Carath´eodory function, that is, it satisfies (a) for each (x, y) ∈ D := {(x, y) ∈ X × Y : ∃z ∈ Z, y ∈ Γ(x, z)}, the function of z, U (x, y, ·) : Z −→ R is Borel measurable; (b) for each z ∈ Z, the function of (x, y), U (·, ·, z) : D −→ R is continuous. The reason for working with Carath´eodory functions instead of continuous functions in the three variables (x, y, z) is twofold. On the one hand, the Markov operator (M f )(x, z) :=ZZ f (x, z′)Q(z, dz′), (3.2) does not preserve continuity of f , if f is continuous but not bounded, as the simple example in Appendix C shows. On the other hand, the Bellman operator is well defined for the class of Carath´eodory functions in the unbounded case, while working with the supremum norm is not possible. A direct attack of the Bellman equation in the space of (x, z) -- continuous functions does not work for unbounded functions and/or unbounded shock space: known theorems on local contractions -- with a countable or uncountable index set -- are not suitable, due to the averaging operation involved in the computation of conditional expectations. For this reason we are going to use L1-type seminorms, whose precise definition is given below. We now describe the function space, which details are given in Appendix B. For each z ∈ Z, let L1(Z, Z, Qz) be the space of Borel measurable functions9 g : Z −→ R such thatRZ g(z′)Qz(dz′) < ∞. In what follows, we let K be the family of all compact subsets of X. Consider the space E := L1(Z; C(X)), formed by Carath´eodory functions f : X × Z −→ R such that the function z′ 7→ maxx∈K fx(z′) is in L1(Z, Z, Qz), for all compact sets K ∈ K, and all z ∈ Z. See Appendix B for the definitions and the notation, where it is also proved the following fundamental result. Lemma 3.1. E = L1(Z; C(X)) is a complete locally convex space with the topology generated by the family of seminorms P := {pK,z}K∈K,z∈Z, given by 9It is well known that L1(Z, Z, Qz) consists of equivalence classes rather than functions, identifying functions pK,z(f ) :=ZZ max x∈K f (x, z′)Qz(dz′). (3.3) that are equal Qz -- almost everywhere. 10 In particular, the lemma states that E is sequentially complete. In the notation of Section 2, the index set of the family of seminorms is A = K × Z. Given a solution f ∈ L1(Z; C(X)) of (3.1), define the policy correspondence Gf : X × Z → 2X by Gf (x, z) = {y ∈ Γ(x, z) : f (x, z) = U (x, y, z) + βM f (y, z)}. (3.4) This is the optimal policy correspondence, denoted simply by Γ∗, when f is the value function, v. Remember from Section 2, that for a subset F ⊆ E, the set D(F ) is in this context D(F ) = {p : K × Z → R+ : p(K, z) = pK,z(f ) for some f ∈ F }. Notation 3.2. Along the paper, we will use the notation ψ(x, z) = max y∈Γ(x,z) U (x, y, z) = T 0(x, z) while, for p : K × Z 7−→ R+, the function p[Γ] : X × Z 7−→ R+ is defined by p[Γ](x, z) = p(Γ(x, z), z), that is, it is the function of (x, z) obtained through p, when the compact sets K equal Γ(x, z), for x ∈ X, z ∈ Z. The next result shows that T is an L-local contraction, and gives the expression of L: Given p : K × Z 7→ R+ for which p[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)), the operator L computes the seminorm of the function p[Γ], that is, (Lp)(K, z) = βpK,z(p[Γ]). Note that L is nonlinear. The expanded definition of the operator L is the expression (3.5) below. Proposition 3.3. Let the Bellman operator T : F −→ E, where F ⊆ L1(Z; C(X)), such that for all p ∈ D(F ), p[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). Then, T is an L-local contraction on F with COP L : D(F ) −→ RK×Z given by + (Lp)(K, z) = βZZ max x∈K p(Γ(x, z′), z′)Qz(dz′), (3.5) for all K ∈ K and z ∈ Z. Proof. Following Blackwell (1965), we exploit the fact that T is monotone, in conjunction with the properties of the seminorms pK,z. Let f, g ∈ E and let x ∈ X, K ∈ K and z ∈ Z. Let y ∈ Γ(x, z) and z′ ∈ Z arbitrary. Then f (y, z′) ≤ g(y, z′) + f (y, z′) − g(y, z′) implies f (y, z′) ≤ g(y, z′) + maxy∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′) − g(y, z′) and then, by monotonicity and linearity of the integral, ZZ f (y, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ZZ g(y, z′)Qz(dz′) +ZZ max y∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′) − g(y, z′)Qz(dz′). We are allowed to take the integral by Lemma A.1. The inequality is maintained after multiplying by β and adding U (x, y, z) to both sides. Then, by taking the maximum in y ∈ Γ(x, z) to both sides, we have (T f )(x, z) ≤ (T g)(x, z) + β max max y∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′) − g(y, z′)Qz(dz′) max y∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′) − g(y, z′)Qz(dz′) y∈Γ(x,z)ZZ = (T g)(x, z) + βZZ = (T g)(x, z) + βpΓ(x,z),z(f − g). 11 Exchanging the roles of f and g, we have (T f )(x, z) − (T g)(x, z) ≤ βpΓ(x,z),z(f − g). It is convenient to write this inequality with the dummy variable z′ instead of z. Now, taking the maximum in x ∈ K and averaging with respect to the measure Qz, we obtain ZZ max x∈K (T f )(x, z′) − (T g)(x, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ βZZ max x∈K pf −g(Γ(x, z′), z′)Qz(dz′). This inequality can be rewritten pK,z(T f − T g) ≤ (Lpf −g)(K, z), for all K ∈ K, z ∈ Z, where L is the operator defined in (3.5). One of the difficulties in applying contraction techniques to the dynamic programming equation, when the return function and/or the space of shocks is unbounded, is the selection of a suitable space of functions where the Bellman operator is a selfmap. Assumption (B6) below provides a scheme to construct such a space along the lines of assumption (VI) in Section 2. This is in the same spirit of Assumption 9.3 in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), pp. 248-249. Our assumption is not about bounding the one-shot utility function U along any policy path by a function that depends only on time and the initial state, but about bounding its expected value with respect to the initial state. This is an important difference, as it allows us to deal with an unbounded space of shocks. (B6) There is a collection of nonnegative functions {lt}∞ t=0 ∈ L1(Z; C(X)), such that for all x ∈ X, for all z ∈ Z maxy∈Γ(x,z) lt(y, z′)Qz(dz′), for all t = 0, 1, . . ., l0(x, z) ≥ ψ(x, z); lt+1(x, z) ≥ βZZ and the series w :=P∞ t=0 lt is unconditionally convergent, that is, R(K, z) := ∞Xt=0 pK,z(lt) < ∞, for all K ∈ K, for all z ∈ Z. Now we consider a suitable set C where L is defined. C =np : K × Z 7−→ R+ : p(K, z) ≤ cR0(K, z) for some c > 0, and p[Γ] ∈ L1(Z, C(X))o. (3.6) As it is proved in Lemma A.4, C is not trivial, as it contains the images of V (0, R0) by the family of seminorms P. Theorem 3.5 below is a fixed point theorem for the Bellman operator with unbounded utility and unbounded space of shocks. We state a previous lemma. Lemma 3.4. Let assumptions (B1) to (B6) hold. Then T and L with C defined in (3.6), satisfy (I) to (VI). 12 Theorem 3.5. Let assumptions (B1) to (B6) hold. The following is true. (a) The Bellman equation admits a unique solution v∗ in V (0, R0). (b) If the correspondence Gv∗ defined in (3.4) admits a measurable selection, then v∗ coincides with the value function, v = v∗, and for all v0 ∈ V (0, R0), T nv0 → v as n → ∞, that is, pK,z(T nv0−v) → 0, for all K ∈ K and z ∈ Z. Moreover, for all z ∈ Z, the optimal policy correspondence Γ∗(·, z) : X → X is non-empty, compact valued and upper hemicontinuous. Proof. (a) T is an L -- contraction by Proposition 3.3 and all the assumptions of Theorem 2.5 hold true by Lemma 3.4. Hence T admits a unique fixed point v∗ is V (0, R0) and the rest of conclusions of Theorem 3.5 hold true. (b) To see that v∗ is the value function of the problem, we invoke Theorem 9.2 in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989). Recall that, for any function F that is µt(z0, ·)-integrable, its conditional expectation can be expressed as Ez0(F ) :=ZZ t F (zt)µt(z0, dzt) =ZZ t−1(cid:20)ZZ =ZZ(cid:20)ZZ t−1 F (zt−1, zt)Qzt−1(dzt)(cid:21) µt−1(z0, dzt−1) F (z1, zt 2)µt−1(z1, dzt 2)(cid:21) Qz0(dz1). The assumptions of Theorem 9.2 in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989) are: (i) Γ is non-empty valued, with a measurable graph and admits a measurable selection; (ii) for each (x0, z0) and each feasible plan π from (x0, z0), U (πt−1(zt−1), πt(zt), zt) is µt(z0, ·)-integrable, t = 1, 2, . . ., and the limit nXt=1ZZ t U (x0, π0, z0) + lim n→∞ βtU (πt−1(zt−1), πt(zt), zt)µt(z0, dzt) (3.7) exists; and (iii) limt→∞RZ t βtv∗(πt−1(zt−1), zt)µt(z0, dzt) = 0. (i) is implied by (B5) and (ii) is implied by (B6), since U (πt−1(zt−1), πt(zt), zt) is clearly mea- surable, given that U is a Carath´eodory function. Moreover, since l0 in (B6) is in Ca(X × Z), we can apply Fubini's Theorem so that l0(π1(z1), z2) is µ2(z0, ·)-integrable and ZZ2 l0(π1(z1), z2)µ2(z0, dz2) =ZZ1(cid:18)ZZ l0(π1(z1), z2)Qz1(dz2)(cid:19) µ1(z0, dz1) l1(π0(z0), z1)µ1(z0, dz1) ≤ZZ1 1 β ≤ 1 β2 l2(x0, z0). Both inequalities are due to assumption (B6). By induction, we get that l(πt−1(zt−1), zt) is µt(z0, ·) -- integrable and ZZ t l0(πt−1(zt−1), zt)µt(z0, dzt) ≤ 13 1 βt lt(x0, z0). Since U (πt−1(zt−1), πt(zt), zt) ≤ l0(πt−1(zt−1), zt), the first part of (ii) is proved. Indeed, this esti- mate provides the bound U (x0, π0(z0), z0) + βtU (πt−1(zt−1), πt(zt), zt)µt(z0, dzt) ≤ U (x0, π0(z0), z0) + lt(x0, z0) ≤ w0(x0, z0), nXt=1ZZ t nXt=1 hence the second part of (ii) also holds, that is, the limit (3.7) is finite. Moreover, since the above inequality holds for any π ∈ Π(x0, z0), it shows that the n -- th iteration of T on the null function as the initial seed satisfies T n0(x0, z0) ≤ w0(x0, z0). Hence, sinceRZ T n0(x0, z1) − v∗(x0, z1)Qz0 (dz1) tends to 0 as n → ∞, by part (a) above, we obtain the bound ZZ v∗(x0, z1)Qz0(dz1) ≤ZZ w0(x0, z1)Qz0(dz1). (3.8) This inequality will be used to show (iii). First, we claim that for any t, for any π ∈ Π(x0, z0), ZZ t βtw0(πt−1(zt−1), zt)µt(z0, dzt) ≤ ls(x0, z0). ∞Xs=t To prove it, we employ mathematical induction. Let t = 1. Then, by assumption (B6) ZZ βw0(π0(z0), z1)µ1(z0, dz1) =ZZ ∞Xt=0 ∞Xt=0 = ≤ β ∞Xt=0 βZZ lt+1(x0, z0). lt(π0(z0), z1)Qz0(dz1) lt(π0(z0), z1)Qz0(dz1) The exchange of the integral and infinite sum is possible by the Monotone Convergence Theorem. Suppose that the property is true for t and let us prove it for t + 1. Then it will hold for any t. Note ZZ t+1 βt+1w0(πt(zt), zt+1)µt+1(z0, dzt+1) βtw0(πt−1(zt−1), zt)µt(z0, dzt)(cid:19) Qz0(dz1) ls(π0(z0), z1)Qz0 (dz1) =ZZ(cid:18)βZZ t ≤ZZ ∞Xs=t ∞Xs=t+1 ≤ β ls(x0, z0), again by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, and where we have used Fubini's Theorem and the induction hypothesis. This and (3.8) imply (iii), since the series w0 converges. Thus, v∗ is the value function. The claims about Γ∗ are immediate from the Theorem of the Maximum of Berg´e. The following result provides a sufficient condition for (B6). 14 Proposition 3.6. Let assumptions (B1) to (B5) to hold. Suppose that there is l0 ∈ L1(Z; C(X)) with ψ ≤ l0, α ≥ 0 such that αβ < 1, and ZZ max y∈Γ(x,z) l0(y, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ αl0(x, z), for all x ∈ X, z ∈ Z. Then (B6) holds, with R0(K, z) = 1 1−αβ pK,z(l0). Proof. Choose lt = (αβ)tl0, for t = 0, 1, . . .. Then βZZ max y∈Γ(x,z) lt(y, z′)Qz(dz′) = β(αβ)tZZ max y∈Γ(x,z) l0(y, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ (αβ)t+1l0(x, z) = lt+1(x0, z0). Hence, w(x0, z0) = 1 1−αβ l0(x0, z0) and R0(K, z) = 1 1−αβ pK,z(l0), for K ∈ K and z ∈ Z. 4 Applications 4.1 Endogenous growth Endogenous growth models have become fundamental to understand economic growth. From the huge literature studying this field, few contributions consider an unbounded shock space. Some exceptions are Stachurski (2002) and Kamihigashi (2007), but with uncorrelated shocks. I consider here the stochastic endogenous growth model studied in Jones, Manuelli, Siu and Stacchetti (2005), which is described as follows. The preferences of the agent over random consumptions sequences are given by subject to max E ∞Xt=0 βt c1−σ t 1 − σ υ(ℓt) , ct + kt+1 + ht+1 ≤ ztAkα t (ntht)1−α + (1 − δk)kt + (1 − δh)ht, ℓt + nt ≤ 1, ct, kt, ht, ℓt, nt ≥ 0 (4.1) (4.2) (4.3) (4.4) for all t = 0, 1, . . ., with k0 and h0 given. Here, {zt} is a Markov stochastic process with transition probability Qz(·) and Z = [1, ∞); ct is consumption; ℓt is leisure; nt is hours spent working; kt and ht are the stock of physical and human capital, respectively; δk and δh are the depreciation rates on physical and human capital, respectively; and υ is a continuous function on (0, 1], strictly increasing. The usual non-negativity constraints on consumption, investment, leisure and hours worked apply. The feasible correspondence is thus Γ(k, h, z) =n(k′, h′, c, n, ℓ) : (4.2) -- (4.4) hold with x′ = xt+1, x = xt for x = k, h, c, n, ℓ, zo, 15 and the utility function is U (c, ℓ) = c1−σ υ(ℓ) . Regarding the function υ, we consider υ(ℓ) = ℓψ(1−σ). The endogenous state space is X = R+ × R+ and the family of compact sets K is formed by compact sets in the product space R+ × R+. The Markov chain is given by the log -- log process 1−σ ln zt+1 = ρ ln zt + ln wt+1, (4.5) (2005) suppose that zt = exp(cid:16)ζt − σ2 ǫ with ρ ≥ 0 and where the w's are i.i.d., with support in W ⊆ [1, ∞). Let µ be the distribution measure10 of the w's. Note that ρ = 0 corresponds to shocks zt that are i.i.d.. Jones, Manuelli, Siu and Stacchetti 2(1−ρ2)(cid:17), where ζt+1 = ρζt + ǫt+1 and the ǫ's are i.i.d., normal 2(1+ρ)(cid:17). We do ǫ . This corresponds to (4.5) with11 wt+1 = exp(cid:16)ǫt+1 − σ2 with mean 0 and variance σ2 not need to restrict ǫ to be normally distributed. To shorten notation, let us define δ = min{δk, δh}, γ = Aαα(1 − α)1−α + (1 − δ), and g(k, h) = Akα(nh)1−α + (1 − δ)(k + h). Also, let Θ = E(w 1−ρ ) = 1−σ ǫ 1−σ 1−ρ µ(dw). RW w Theorem 4.1. Consider the endogenous growth model described in (4.1) -- (4.5) with 0 ≤ σ < 1 and 0 ≤ ρ < 1. If βγ1−σΘ < 1, (4.6) then the associated Bellman equation admits a unique solution, v∗, in the set V (0, R0), where, for K ∈ K and z ∈ Z R0(K, z) =(cid:18) Θ 1 − βγ1−σΘ(cid:19) z ρ(1−σ) 1−ρ max (k,h)∈K g(k, h)1−σ. Moreover, v∗ is the value function v and pK,z(T nv0 − v) converges to 0 as n → ∞, for all K ∈ K, z ∈ Z and all initial guess v0 ∈ V (0, R0). Proof. We check all the hypotheses of Theorem 3.5. It is clear that (B1) -- (B5) are fulfilled. Regarding (B6), we will use Proposition 3.6 for a suitable function l0. Since 0 ≤ σ < 1, both U and υ are bounded from below by zero, and υ is bounded above by 1. Since z ≥ 1 and by the definition of δ, we have zAkα(nh)1−α + (1 − δk)k + (1 − δh)h ≤ zg(h, k). Then ψ(k, h, z) ≤ 1 1 − σ z1−σg(k, h)1−σ ≤ 1 1 − σ 1−σ 1−ρ g(k, h)1−σ = l0(k, h, z). z Let us prove that βRZbl0(k, h, z, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ αl0(k, h, z), for all (k, h) ∈ K, for all z ∈ Z, and for all K ∈ K, where α = γ1−σΘ. Here, to simplify notation in what follows, we have defined bl0(k, h, z, z′) = max (k′,h′,c,n,ℓ)∈Γ(k,h,z) l0(k, h, z). 10With correlated shocks, the method developed in Matkowski and Nowak (2011) would require µ(z′ ∈ Zj+1Zj = z) = 1 for a suitable increasing family {Zj }∞ j=1 of compact sets that fills Z. We do not impose this strong constraint on µ. In fact, (4.5) do nos satisfy it if W is unbounded and µ has not compact support. 11Since, from (4.5), zt+1 = zρ t wt+1, it is clear that, to keep z ≥ 1, it is necessary (and sufficient) to have w ≥ 1. Thus, the assumption that the random variable ǫ is normally distributed with mean 0 should be modified to fulfill the requirement that the random variable w has support W in [1, ∞). The assumption z ≥ 1 is usually imposed in growth models with a multiplicative structure, see Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989). 16 First, we determine a bound forbl0. To this end, consider the Lagrange problem max g(k′, h′)1−σ, s. t.: k′ + h′ ≤ zg(k, h), k′, h′ ≥ 0, (4.7) and notice that its feasible set is larger than Γ(k, h, z). The constraint is binding at the optimal solution, which is k′ = αzg(k, h), h′ = (1 − α)zg(k, h). Substituting this into the objective function of (4.7), 1−ρ γ1−σz1−σg(k, h)1−σ. 1−σ 1−σ (z′) we find its optimal value, γ1−σz1−σg(k, h)1−σ. Thus,bl0(k, h, z, z′) ≤ 1 Second, we use the conditional expectationRZ (z′) 1−ρ Qz(dz′) = zρ 1−σ 1−σ 1−ρ Θ to estimate ZZbl0(k, h, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ γ1−σz1−σzρ 1−σ = γ1−σΘl0(k, h, z). 1−ρ Θg(k, h)1−σ Since βγ1−σΘ < 1, Proposition 3.6 applies. The expression for R0 requires a simple computation. 4.2 Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy Lucas (1978) studied the determination of equilibrium asset prices in a pure exchange economy in a framework that has become classical in the economics and financial literature. Boundedness of the utility function, as well as compactness of the space of shocks, are important hypotheses in the development of this model. In this section, we show that these hypotheses can be dispensed with by using the results of Theorem 3.5. In this way, we significantly extend the model's range of applicability. We closely follow Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989) in the exposition of the problem. The preferences of the representative consumer over random consumption sequences are E ∞Xt=0 βtu(ct), (4.8) where u : R+ −→ R+ is continuous, not necessarily bounded, with12 u(0) = 0 and where β ∈ (0, 1). There are i = 1, . . . , k productive assets taking values on a set Z ⊆ Rk +, not necessarily compact, with Borel sets Z. The components zi of the vector z = (z1, . . . , zk)⊤ in Z represents the dividend paid by one unit of asset i. In the description of the model, all vectors are considered column vectors, and the symbol ⊤ denotes transposition. We assume that the dividends follow a Markov process, with stationary transition function Q on (Z, Z). Assets are traded on a competitive stock market at an equilibrium price given by a stationary continuous price function p : Z −→ Rk +, where p(z) = (p1(z), . . . , pk(z))⊤ is the vector of asset prices if the current state of the economy is z (the notation for prices should not be confused with the notation for seminorms, which always carry a subindex). The goal is to characterize equilibrium asset prices. Let x = (x1, . . . , xk)⊤ ∈ Rk + be the vector of the consumer's asset holdings. Given the price function p, the initial state of the economy z0 and initial 12If u does not satisfy u ≥ 0 and u(0) = 0, but is bounded from below, it may be modified to u(c) − u(0) to fulfill our hypotheses. 17 asset holdings x0, the consumer chooses a sequence of plans for consumption and end-of-period asset holdings that maximizes discounted expected utility (4.8) subject to ct + x⊤ t+1p(zt) ≤ x⊤ ct, xt+1 ≥ 0 t (zt + p(zt)) for all zt, for all t. for all zt, for all t, (4.9) (4.10) The consumer holds exactly one unit of each asset in equilibrium, hence we can restrict the state space to X = [0, x]k, with x > 1, with its Borel subsets X . The correspondence Γ : X × Z −→ 2X is Γ(x, z) = {y ∈ X : y⊤p(z) ≤ x⊤(z + p(z))}. Assuming that p is continuous, Γ is nonempty, compact valued and continuous. Given the price p, the dynamic programming equation is v(x, z) = max y∈Γ(x,z)nu(x⊤z + (x − y)⊤p(z)) + βZZ v(y, z′)Qz(dz′)o. (4.11) We will look for solutions to this functional equation in the class L1(Z; C(X)). Since the state space is compact, and the utility function u is bounded from below, we take the trivial family of compact sets K = {X} in this model, and not the whole family of compact subsets of X. We impose the following assumptions. u is nondecreasing and concave; pi(z) ≤ a⊤ i z + bi for some vectors ai ≥ 0 and scalars bi > 0, (4.12) (4.13) i = 1, . . . , k. Hence, we look for equilibrium prices in the class of functions that are bounded by an affine function. Other possibilities could obviously be explored. We state two results about the existence of equilibrium in a Lucas asset pricing model satisfying (4.12) and (4.13) under two different regimes for the Markov chain. (M1) The Markov chain is given by zt+1 = Bzt + wt, where B a matrix of order k with non -- negative t=1 are i.i.d. random vectors with support in a entries and norm13 kBk < 1, and where {wt}∞ Borel subset W ⊆ Rk + with finite expectation, 0 ≤ Ew < ∞. (M2) The Markov chain is given by zi,t+1 = zρi all i = 1, . . . , k, and where {wt}∞ W ⊆ [1, ∞)k such that i,twi,t+1, for all t = 0, 1, 2, . . ., where 0 ≤ ρi ≤ 1 for t=1 are i.i.d. random vectors14 with support in a Borel subset (4.14) : x ∈ Rl with x 6= 0o. The condition kBk < 1 is equivalent to saying that the spectral radius of B -- the maximum of the module of the eigenvalues of B -- is 13The norm of a matrix B is defined by kBk = supn kBxk ρi ≤ 1 for all i = 1, . . . , k and, if ρi = 1, then Ewi < 1/β. kxk less than one. 14Hence, we are now considering a linear log -- log system of uncoupled equations for the evolution of dividends. 18 In the proof that follows, as well as in the rest of the paper, we use the same notation for inequalities between scalars and inequalities between vectors, which have to be understood in a pointwise manner. Theorem 4.2. Consider the Lucas Asset Pricing model described above in (4.8)-(4.10), for which (4.12) and (4.13) hold and the Markov chain satisfies either (M1) or (M2). Then there is a unique solution of (4.11) in V (0, R0) for a suitable R0, which is the value function v of the problem, and the conclusions of Theorem 3.5 hold. Proof. Let A be the matrix whose columns are the vectors a1, . . . , ak in (4.13), and let b = (b1, . . . , bk)⊤, hence we can write 0 ≤ p(z) ≤ Az + b. Let us construct a family of functions {lt}∞ t=0 satisfying assumption (B6). Obviously x⊤(z + p(z)) ≤ x⊤z(Ik + A) + x⊤b, where Ik is the indentity matrix. Since u is increasing and concave, for a supergradient u of u at x⊤b > 0, we have ψ(x, z) = u(x⊤(z + p(z)) ≤ u(x⊤b) + u x⊤(Ik + A)z. We define l0(z) = u(x⊤b)+u x⊤(Ik +A)z and, recursively, lt+1(z) = βRZ lt(z′)Q(z, dz′), for t = 0, 1, . . .. Suppose first that Q satisfies (M1). In this case, Ezz′ = Bz + Ew, hence l1(z) = βZZ l0(z′)Q(z, dz′) = βu(x⊤b) + βu x⊤(Ik + A)Ezz′ We will prove by induction that = β(u(x⊤b) + u x⊤(Ik + A)(Bz + Ew). for all t = 1, 2, . . .. For t = 1 it has been just proved. Suppose it is true for t. Then lt(z) = βtu(x⊤b) + βtu x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:0)Btz + (Bt−1 + · · · + Ik)Ew(cid:1), lt+1 = βt+1u(x⊤b) + βt+1u x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:0)BtEzz′ + (Bt−1 + · · · + Ik)Ew(cid:1) = βt+1u(x⊤b) + βt+1u x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:0)Bt(Bz + Ew) + (Bt−1 + · · · + Ik)Ew(cid:1), and we are done. On the other hand, (Bt−1 + · · · + Ik)Ew ≤ (Ik − B)−1Ew, since B has nonnegative t=0 lt(z) is unconditionally convergent, entries, kBk < 1 and Ew > 0. Hence, the series w0(z) = P∞ since it is bounded by the function of L1(Z) defined by 1 1 − β w0(z) := (u(x⊤b) + βu x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:0)(Ik − βB)−1z + (Ik − B)−1Ew(cid:1), t=0(βB)t = (Ik − βB)−1. Hence (B6) holds with R0(z) =P∞ where we have usedP∞ z(Ik + A) and let lt+1(z) = βRZ lt(z′)Q(z, dz′), for t = 0, 1, . . .. Then it is easy to prove by induction k Ewk)⊤. Define, as above, l0(z) = u(x · b) + u x · If Q satisfies (M2), then Ezz′ = (zρ1 1 Ew1, . . . , zρk t=0 pz(lt). that lt(z) = βtu(x⊤b) + βtu x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:16)zρt 1 1 Πt−1 s=0E(cid:16)wρs 1 (cid:17), . . . , zρt 1 k k Πt−1 s=0E(cid:16)wρs k (cid:17)(cid:17)⊤ k . 19 1 1 (Ew1)1/(1−ρ1) , . . . , zρt k k (Ewk)1/(1−ρk)(cid:17)⊤ . t=0 lt(z) is clearly (unconditionally) convergent since β < 1 and ρi < 1 for all i = 1, . . . , k. The ratio test can be used to prove this claim. In the case in which ρj = 1 for some j, then the bound above no longer applies, as a term zj(Ewj)t i i and thus i (cid:17) ≤ (Ewi)ρs lt(z) ≤ βtu(x⊤b) + βtu x⊤(Ik + A)(cid:16)zρt By Jensen's inequality, E(cid:16)wρs In the case that ρi < 1 for all i = 1, . . . , k, the series w0(z) =P∞ appears in position j of the vector (cid:16)zρt βEwj < 1 assures convergence of the series w0(z) =P∞ with R0(z) =P∞ t=0 pz(lt). Thus, Theorem 3.5 applies. k Πt−1 t=0 lt(z). 1 Πt−1 s=0Ewρs 1 , . . . , zρt k 1 1 s=0Ewρs k k (cid:17)⊤ Hence, in both cases considered, (M1) and (M2), the condition (4.14) guarantees that (B6) holds . However, the assumption To complete the circle, we have to prove that our conjecture (4.13) about the equilibrium price holds. Following Lucas (1978) or Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), we now assume the further conditions: we also impose u(0) = 0, u is continuously differentiable, with u′(c) > 0 for all c ≥ 0, (4.15) and strictly concave; there are constants γ, δ ≥ 0 such that cu′(c) ≤ γc + δ, for all c ≥ 0; there exists a > 0 such that u′(1⊤z) ≥ a for all z ∈ Z, where 1 = (1, . . . , 1)⊤. (4.16) (4.17) A function like u(c) = c1−σ/(1 − σ) + c, with 0 ≤ σ < 1, satisfies (4.15)-(4.17). Also, if Z is bounded, then (4.15) implies (4.17). Finding an equilibrium price function p(z) = (p1(z), . . . , pk(z))⊤ is equivalent to finding functions φ1(z), . . . , φk(z) that satisfy the k independent functional equations φi(z) = hi(z) + βZZ φi(z′)Q(z, dz′), i = 1, . . . , k, (4.18) iu′(1⊤z′)Q(z, dz′), for all i = 1, . . . , k. Lucas (1978) shows that a solution to where hi(z) = βRZ z′ (4.18) provides an equilibrium price p given by pi(z) = φi(z) u′(1⊤z) , for i = 1, . . . , k. (4.19) Let, as in Lucas (1978), the operator Ti be Tif (z) = hi(z) + βZZ f (z′)Q(z, dz′), for all f ∈ L1(Z, Z, Qz), i = 1, . . . , k. Note that, in this context, the seminorms are simply defined by pz(f ) =RZ f (z′)Qz(dz′). It is pretty clear that the COP associated to Ti is given by Lp(z) = βZZ p(z′)Qz(dz′), where p belongs to a suitable set C as defined in (3.6). 20 Theorem 4.3. Consider the Lucas Asset Pricing model described above in (4.8)-(4.10), for which (4.15) -- (4.17) hold and the Markov chain satisfies either (M1) or (M2). Then there is an equilibrium price p satisfying (4.13). Proof. Note that z ≥ 0 and (4.16) imply ziu′(1⊤z) ≤ (1⊤z)u′(1⊤z) ≤ γ(1⊤z) + δ. (4.20) Suppose that Q satisfies (M1). Then hi(z) ≤ β(cid:0)γ(cid:0)1⊤Ezz′(cid:1) + δ(cid:1) ≤ β(cid:0)γ(cid:0)1⊤(Bz + Ew)(cid:1) + δ(cid:1) . This implies that the operator Ti is a self -- map in L1(Z), for all i = 1, . . . , k. We want to apply Theorem 3.5 to each of the operators Ti, where the COP associated to Ti is given just above the theorem. Let l0(z) = hi(z) and define lt(z) = βt(cid:0)γ(cid:0)1⊤(Btz + Ew)(cid:1) + δ(cid:1) , for t = 1, 2, . . .. It is immediate to check that lt+1 ≥ βRZ lt(z′)Q(z, dz′) and that the series w0(z) = P∞ t=0 lt(z) is (unconditionally) convergent, since βkBk < 1. The sum of this series is w0(z) = γ1⊤(Ik − 1−β (γ1⊤Ew + δ). Hence, (B6) holds. Moreover, following analogous reasonings as in the βB)−1z + 1 proof of part (b) of Theorem 3.5, the fixed point of Ti, φi, satisfies φi ≤ w0, and thus, by (4.17) pi(z) = φi(z) u′(1⊤z) ≤ 1 a γ1⊤(Ik − βB)−1z + 1 a(1 − β) (γ1⊤Ew + δ), for all i = 1, . . . , k, where the right hand side is an affine function of z. Then, p = (p1, . . . , pk)⊤ satisfies (4.13) with a⊤ i = 1 a γ1⊤(Ik − βB)−1, bi = 1 a(1 − β) (γ1⊤Ew + δ), for all i = 1, . . . , k. Suppose that Q satisfies (M2). Now Ezz′ = (zρ1 1 Ew1, . . . , zρk k Ewk)⊤. From (4.20), we have hi(z) ≤ β(γ(1⊤(zρ1 1 Ew1, . . . , zρk k Ewk)) + δ). Let l0(z) = hi(z) and lt+1(z) = βRZ lt(z′)Q(z, dz′), for t = 0, 1, . . .. When 0 ≤ ρi < 1 for all i = 1, . . . , k, using similar arguments as in the proof of Theorem 4.2, we have k k (Ewk)1/(1−ρk)(cid:17) + βtδ lt(z) ≤ βtγ1⊤(cid:16)zρt ≤ βt(γµ1⊤z + δ), 1 1 (Ew1)1/(1−ρ1), . . . , zρt γµ1 1−β ⊤z+δ where µ := max(cid:8)z1(Ew1)1/(1−ρ1), . . . , zk(Ewk)1/(1−ρk)(cid:9). Hence, the infinite series w0(z) =P∞ t=0 lt(z) = is (unconditionally) convergent, (B6) holds and the fixed point of Ti, φi, satisfies φi ≤ w0. a(1−β) and a(1−β) , for all i = 1, . . . , k. In the case in which some ρj = 1, the coordinate j on the vector s=0E(wρs It is clear then that the price p = (p1, . . . , pk)⊤ defined in (4.19) satisfies (4.13) with ai = γµ bi = k )(cid:17) is equal to zjEwj, and then βEwj < 1 is required to have con- t=0 lt(z), which is then bounded by an affine expression in z; hence, as in the s=0E(wρs k Πt−1 δ k 1 1 1 Πt−1 1 ), . . . , zρt (cid:16)zρt vergence of the seriesP∞ previous case, (4.13) holds. k 21 5 Conclusions In this paper, we develop a general framework to analyze stochastic dynamic problems with unbounded utility functions and unbounded shock space. We obtain new results concerning the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Bellman equation through a fixed point theorem that generalizes the results known for Banach contractions and local contractions. This generalization is possible by con- sidering seminorms that give a different treatment to the endogenous state variable and the exogenous one. While a supremum norm on arbitrary compact sets is considered in the former variable, an L1 type norm is in the latter variable. Putting together this definition with the aforementioned general- ization of the local contraction concept, we are able to maintain the monotonicity (in a mild sense) of the Bellman operator, thus proving that it is essentially a contractive operator. The usefulness of the approach and the applicability of the results are clearly revealed in the analysis of two fundamental models of economic analysis: an endogenous growth model with a multiplicative structure in the shocks and the Lucas model of an exchange economy. The combination of unbounded rewards and unbounded shocks makes it hard to prove the existence of a unique fixed point of the Bellman equation. In this sense, another benefit of the paper is to provide a secure method to check the hypotheses needed to apply the approach, based on assumption (B6), and one that can be used straightforwardly to analyze other models. A challenging problem is to extend the theorems to deal with the unbounded from below case in a more satisfactory way, as done in Rinc´on-Zapatero and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero (2003) or Martins da Rocha and Vailakis (2010) for the deterministic case, by introducing a suitable family of pseudodistances. 22 A Proofs of auxiliary results Proof of Lemma 2.4. Due to the subhomogeneity of L for finite sums, L(r0 + Lr0 + · · · + LT r0) ≤ Lr0+· · ·+LT +1r0 ≤ R0, for all finite T . Letting T → ∞, we obtain r0+LR0 ≤ R0. Let x ∈ VF (x0, R0), so da(x0, x) ≤ R0(a) for all a ∈ A. By the triangle inequality and since T is an L -- local contraction da(x0, T x) ≤ da(x0, T x0) + da(T x0, T x) ≤ d0(a) + (Lda)(x0, x) ≤ d0(a) + (LR0)(a) ≤ R0(a). This proves (a). To show (b), note that, by the same arguments used to prove (a), for LtR0 ≤ Ltr0 + Lt+1r0 + · · · , for all t = 0, 1, . . .. Then LtR0(a) is bounded by the remainder of the convergent series R0(a), thus it converges to 0 as t → ∞, for all a ∈ A. Q.E.D. Given f ∈ Ca(X × Z), we denote bf (x, z) := max y∈Γ(x,z) y∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z). We will make use of the following lemma in the main text and along this appendix. Proof. (1) Given the assumption made about the continuity of Γ, by the Berg´e Theorem of the Maxi- f (y, z), cf (x, z) := max Lemma A.1. (1) For all f ∈ Ca(X × Z), both bf , cf ∈ Ca(X × Z). (2) For all f ∈ L1(Z; C(X)), both bf , cf ∈ L1(Z, Z, Qz), for all z ∈ Z. mum, the map x 7→ bf (x, z) is continuous, for any z ∈ Z fixed, and by the Measurable Theorem of the Maximum, z 7→ bf (x, z) is Borel measurable; thus, bf is a Carath´eodory function on X × Z. Obviously, the same is true for cf . z ∈ Z, thenRZcf (y, z′)Qz(dz′) = pΓ(x,z),z(f ) < ∞. Obviously, the same is true for bf . (2) Since pK,z(f ) < ∞ for all K ∈ K and all z ∈ Z, and Γ(x, z) is a compact set for any x ∈ X, Proof of Lemma 3.4. We organize the proof in several previous lemmas. Lemma A.2. Let assumptions (B1) to (B6) to hold. Then t=0 Ltpl0 < ∞; 2. R0[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)) and pl0 + LR0 ≤ R0. 1. P∞ Proof. Given x ∈ X and z ∈ Z, βplt[Γ](x, z) = βRZ maxy∈Γ(x,z) lt(y, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ lt+1(x, z), hence Ltpl0 ≤ Lt−1pl1 ≤ · · · ≤ plt. By (B6), the seriesP∞ thusP∞ plt[Γ] ∈ L1(Z, C(X)) and then Lplt(K, z) = βpK,z(plt[Γ]) ≤ pK,z(lt+1), for all t = 0, 1, . . .. Thus, t=0 plt(K, z) converges for all K ∈ K and z ∈ Z, t=0 Ltpl0 converges. To conclude the proof, by the triangle inequality pK,z(pl0[Γ] + · · · + plt [Γ]) ≤ pK,z(pl0[Γ]) + · · · + pK,z(pl0 [Γ]) Letting t → ∞ and adding pK,z(ψ) to both sides of the above inequality, we have pK,z(ψ)+pK,z(R0[Γ]) ≤ R0(K, z), showing at the same time that R0[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). ≤ (pK,z(l1) + · · · + pK,z(lt+1). 23 Lemma A.3. Let assumptions (B1) to (B6) to hold. Then f ∈ V (0, R0) implies T f ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). x are Borel measurable. Since (M f )x = M (fx) = M (f + Proof. Let f ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). We use the notation fx and f z, whose meaning is explained in Appendix B. The function fx is Borel measurable for all x ∈ X and Qz -- integrable for any z ∈ Z. Thus, fx can be written as the difference of two positive, Qz -- integrable functions, fx = f + x = max(fx, 0) x = max(−fx, 0). Applying Theorem 8.1 in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989), both M f + and f − x and M f − x ), (M f )x is measurable for any x ∈ X. To see that (M f )z is continuous, consider a sequence {xn} in X that converges to x ∈ X. Then the sequence and its limit form the compact set K = {xn}∪{x}. Let fn := fxn, for n ≥ 1. For all z′ ∈ Z, fn(z′) → fx(z′) as n → ∞, since f is continuous in x. Moreover, f z′ (x), and z′ 7→ supx∈K f z′ (x) is Qz -- integrable by definition of L1(Z; C(X)), thus by the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem ≤ supx∈K f z′ x , where f + x ) − M (f − x −f − (M f )(xn, z) =ZZ fn(z′)Qz(dz′) →ZZ fx(z′)Qz(dz′) = (M f )(x, z), thus (M f )z is continuous. Hence, M f is a Carath´eodory function and thus U (x, y, z) + βM f (y, z) is continuous in (x, y) for all z, and it is Borel measurable in z for all (x, y). By the Berg´e Maximum Theorem, the function T f is thus continuous in x for all z, and by the Measurable Maximum Theorem, it is Borel measurable for any x. In short, the function (x, z) 7→ T f (x, z) = max (U (x, y, z) + βM f (y, z)), y∈Γ(x,z) is a Carath´eodory function. Moreover, if f ∈ F and x ∈ X, z ∈ Z T f (x, z) ≤ max U (x, y, z) + β max max y∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′)Qz(dz′) y∈Γ(x,z) ≤ l0(x, z) + βZZ y∈Γ(x,z)ZZ max y∈Γ(x,z) w(y, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ l0(x, z) + βpΓ(x,z),z(f ). Since Γ(x, z) ∈ K, for f ∈ V (0, R0), we have pΓ(x,z),z(f ) ≤ R0[Γ](x, z). By Lemma A.2, pK,z(l0) + βpK,z(R0[Γ]) ≤ R0(K, z). Hence pK,z(T f ) ≤ R0(K, z). This proves that T f ∈ V (0, R0), and hence that T f ∈ L1(Z, C(X)). Lemma A.4. Let assumptions (B1) to (B6) to hold. Then D(V (0, R0)) ⊆ C. Proof. Since f ∈ V (0, R0), pf ≤ R0, hence we can take c = 1. Also, pf ∈ Ca(X × Z), since pf [Γ](x, z) =RZ maxy∈Γ(x,z) f (y, z′)Qz(dz′) is continuous in x and Borel measurable in z, by Lemma A.1. Moreover, pf [Γ] ≤ R0[Γ] implies pK,z(pf [Γ]) ≤ pK,z(R0[Γ]) ≤ 1 pf [Γ] ∈ L1(Z, C(X)). β R0(K, z), by Lemma A.2. Hence, Now, we are in position to prove Lemma 3.4. First, let us see that L : C −→ C. Let p ∈ C; by the definition of the operator L and Lemma A.2 Lp(K, z) = βpK,z(p[Γ]) ≤ βpK,z(cR0[Γ]) ≤ cR1(K, z) ≤ cR0(K, z), 24 p0, p0+p1, p0+p1+p2, . . . , is bounded by an element P in C, then the infinite sum, p :=P∞ and so, Lp[Γ] ≤ cR0[Γ] and Lp[Γ] ∈ L1(Z, C(X)). Second, we prove that the assumptions (I) to (VI) are fulfilled. Regarding (I), note that p + q ∈ C if p, q ∈ C, trivially, as well it is also immediate that if p′ ∈ C and p ≤ p′, then p ∈ C. On the other hand, if a countable chain of partial sums n=0 pn, is well defined and p ≤ P ≤ cR0 for some constant c. Moreover, since p[Γ] ≤ cR0[Γ] and R0[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)) by Lemma A.2, the Monotone Convergence Theorem implies that p[Γ](x, ·) is Qz -- integrable for all z ∈ Z and all x ∈ X. On the other hand, each function pi[Γ](·, z) is continuous in x, for all i = 1, 2, . . .. By the Wierstrass M test, the function p[Γ](·, z) is also continuous in x for all z ∈ Z. These two observations imply that p[Γ] ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). (II) is trivial; (III) holds, since the integral is monotone, and regarding (IV), it holds true, since for all p, q ∈ C, pK,z(p[Γ] + q[Γ]) ≤ pK,z(p[Γ]) + pK,z(q[Γ]) by definition of the seminorms pK,z, hence L(p + q)(K, z) = pK,z(p[Γ] + q[Γ]) ≤ pK,z(p[Γ]) + pK,z(q[Γ]) = Lp(K, z) + Lq(K, z). L is clearly sup-preserving in C by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, hence (V) also holds. Finally, (VI) is implied by Lemma A.2 and Lemma A.3. B Function space We describe in this section the function space used in Section 3 and we prove Lemma 3.1. Let the measurable space (Z, Z), where Z is the space of shocks and Z is the σ -- algebra of Borel of Z. Remember that Q is a transition function Q : Z × Z → [0, 1] satisfying 1. for each z ∈ Z, Q(z, ·) is a probability measure on (Z, Z); and 2. for each A ∈ Z, Q(·, A) is a Borel measurable function. To simplify notation, let Qz = Q(z, ·). For each z ∈ Z, let L1(Z, Z, Qz) be the space of Borel measurable and Qz -- integrable functions g : Z −→ R. Let the L1 norm with respect to the fixed probability measure Qz kgkz =ZZ g(z′)Qz(dz′), where the notation k · kz means that integration is with respect to the probability measure Qz. In what follows we will omit the σ -- algebra Z from the notation. A function f : X × Z −→ R is a Carath´eodory function on X × Z if it satisfies 1. for each x ∈ X, the function fx := f (x, ·) : Z −→ R is Borel measurable; 2. for each z ∈ Z, the function f z := f (·, z) : X −→ R is continuous. Under our assumptions, a Carath´eodory function is jointly measurable in X×Z, see Aliprantis, and Burkinshaw (1990), Lemma 4.50. Also, a function that is Carath´eodory on X × Z is obviously Carath´eodory on A × Z for all A ⊆ X. Let us denote by Ca(A × Z) the set of all Carath´eodory functions on A × Z. 25 Let K denote the family of compact subsets K ⊆ X. Given z ∈ Z, consider the probability measure Qz(·). For a Carath´eodory function f on X × Z, let pK,z(f ) =ZZ max x∈K f (x, z′)Qz(dz′). Note that this integral is well defined, as for a Carath´eodory function f and compact set K ⊆ X, z′ 7→ maxx∈K fx(z′) is Borel measurable by the Measurable Maximum Theorem, see Aliprantis, and Burkinshaw (1990). Consider the space of Carath´eodory functions f on X × Z for which pK,z(f ) is finite E := {f ∈ Ca(X × Z) : pK,z(f ) < ∞ for all K ∈ K, z ∈ Z}. It is clear that pK,z is a seminorm on E (but not a norm, obviously). Given K ∈ K and z ∈ Z, let EK,z := {f ∈ Ca(K × Z) : pK,z(f ) < ∞}. Lemma B.1. For each K ∈ K and z ∈ Z, (EK,z, pK,z) is a Banach space. Proof. It is clear that EK,z is a vector space and that pK,z is a norm Note that pK,z(f ) = 0 implies RZ f (x, z′)Qz(dz′) = 0 for all x ∈ K, hence f (x, z′) = 0 for all x ∈ K, Qz -- a.s.. Hence f = 0. Let {fn} be a Cauchy sequence. Then pK,z(fn − fm) → 0 as n, m → ∞. There is n(1) such that pK,z(fn(1) − fn) < 2−1 for all n ≥ n(1). Now choose n(2) > n(1) such that pK,z(fn(2) − fn(1)) < 2−2 for all n ≥ n(2) and so on. Thus, we obtain a subsequence n(j) such that pK,z(fn(j+1) − fn(j)) < 2−j for j = 1, 2, . . .. Let, to simplify notation, f j := fn(j) and let gj(z′) := supx∈K f j+1(x, z′) − f j(x, z′). Note that, for all N = 1, 2, . . . NXj=1ZZ gj(z′)µz(dz′) < 2−1 + · · · + 2−N < 1, j=1 gj is a monotone sequence of positive and integrable functions. By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, the function G(z′) = limN→∞ GN (z′) is integrable, and thus finite Qz -- a.e., see j=1 gj(z′) converges Qz -- a.e. Since hence GN =PN Dieudonn´e (1974), (13.6.4). From this it follows that the seriesP∞ NXj=1 ∞Xj=1 f j+1(x, z′) − f j(x, z′) ≤ gj(z′), the series on the left hand side also converges for any x ∈ K, Qz -- a.e. Consider the series f 1(x, z′) + ∞Xj=1(cid:0)f j+1(x, z′) − f j(x, z′)(cid:1) . It converges Qz -- a.e., and if f (x, z′) is its sum, note that by (B.1) and the Weierstrass M -- test, the convergence is uniform in the compact set K. Since every f j is a Carath´eodory function, the limit f (x, z′) is continuous in x. Moreover, the limit is measurable in z′ andRZ maxx∈K f (x, z′)Qz(dz′) ≤ RZ maxx∈K(cid:0)f 1(x, z′) + G(x, z′)(cid:1) Qz(dz′) < ∞, hence f ∈ EK,z. Let us see that the convergence of {fn} to f is in the norm pK,z. To show this, note that the convergence of the series (B.2) is uniform in x ∈ K, hence max x∈K f j(x, z′) − f (x, z′) 26 (B.1) (B.2) tends to 0 as j → ∞ and thus, pK,z(fn(j) − f ) → 0 as j → ∞. However, pK,z(fn − fm) → 0 as n, m → ∞, hence lim n,j→∞ pK,z(fn − f ) ≤ lim n,j→∞ pK,z(fn − fn(j)) + lim n,j→∞ pK,z(fn(j) − f ) = 0. Thus, limn→∞ pK,z(fn − f ) = 0. Let H be the family of all finite subsets H of Z and let, for H ∈ H, Note that pK,H is a norm on pK,H (f ) = sup z∈H pK,z. EK,H := {f ∈ Ca(K × Z) : pK,H (f ) < ∞}, and that, by Lemma B.1, (EK,H , pK,H ) is a Banach space, since the norms pK,H and pK,z are equivalent, for any z ∈ H, and generate the same topology, see Dieudonn´e (1974), (12.14.7). The importance of choosing this family of seminorms instead of the original one is that PH is a directed family by inclusion. That is, if we define H ≤ H ′ if H ⊆ H ′, then for any H, H ′ ∈ H, there exists H ′′ ∈ H such that pK,H ′′ ≥ max{pK,H , pK,H ′ }. An element in EK,H can be written f + MK,H in equivalence class notation where MK,H = {f ∈ EK,H : fx = 0 Qz -- a.e., for all x ∈ K, for all z ∈ H}. Consider the sets and the set of Carath´eodory functions that are integrable with respect to all z ∈ Z, EK,H := {f ∈ Ca(K × Z) : pK,H(f ) < ∞}, EK := {f ∈ Ca(K × Z) : pK,H (f ) < ∞ for all H ∈ H}. Note that EK,H is the quotient space EK,H /MK,H. Let us define MK = TH∈H MK,H and consider the quotient space EK := EK/MK, formed by equivalence classes of functions in EK with respect to the relation MK. That is, two functions of EK are in the same equivalence class if and only if, for any x ∈ K, fx(z′) = gx(z′) Qz -- a.e., for all z ∈ Z. Lemma B.2. EK = \H∈H EK,H . Proof. Let f + MK ∈ EK. Then f + MK ⊆ f + MK,H and pK,H (f + MK) = pK,H (f + MK,H ) < ∞ for all H ∈ H, hence f + MK ∈ EK,H for all H ∈ H. Reciprocally, if g is a representative element of an equivalence class inTH∈H EK,H , then there is f ∈ EK,H such that g = f + MK,H for all H. Hence g − f ∈ MK,H for all H, and thus f − g ∈ MK, or g = f + MK, and hence g ∈ EK. We consider on EK the topology τH generated by the family of seminorms PH = (pK,H )H∈H. We show in the next result that (EK , PH) is the projective limit of the family of Banach spaces (EK,H )H∈H, lim← EK,H , and thus it is a complete locally convex topological space. 27 Lemma B.3. For each K ∈ K, (EK, PH) is a Hausdorff complete locally convex space. Proof. Let τH be the projective topology on EK with respect to the family of Banach spaces (EK,H , pK,H )H∈H. The family H is directed by inclusion. Given H, H ′ ∈ H with H ≤ H ′, let the linear mapping qHH ′ : EK,H ′ → EK,H be given by qHH ′ (f +MH ′ ) = f +MH ′. This is well defined, since EK,H ′ ⊆ EK,H and MH ′ ⊆ MH, for H ≤ H ′. Clearly, each qHH ′ is continuous. Then, by Example 2.2.7 in Bogachev and Smolyanov (2017), the projective limit lim← EK,H coincides with F := TH∈H EK,H . But EK = F by Lemma B.2. To see that τH is Hausdorff (or separated), we have to prove that for all nonzero element g ∈ lim← EK,H , there is H ∈ H and a neighborhood of the zero equivalence class, UK,H ⊆ EK,H , such that g + MK,H /∈ UK,H, see Schaefer (1971) (II.5.1). Since g is nonzero, we have that g + MK,H is nonzero for all H ∈ H, hence there is H ∈ H such that pK,H (g + MK,H) = pK,H (g) = δ > 0. Then, letting UK,H = {f + MK,H ∈ EK,H : pK,H(f + MK,H) < δ/2}, we are done. To conclude the proof, note that the projective limit of Banach spaces is a complete locally convex space, see Schaefer (1971) (II.5.3). Proof of Lemma 3.1 As in the the previous lemma, we work with the directed family of semi- norms PH . As discussed above, it generates the same topology as P. Let P =QK∈K EK, endowed with the Tychonoff product topology. By Lemma B.3, each EK is a complete locally convex space, thus P is also a complete locally convex space. Moreover, P is obviously Hausdorff, since the family of seminorms is separating. Let us see that there is a linear homomorphism between E and P , so the lemma follows. Let φ : E −→ P be defined by φ(f ) = (fK)K∈K, where fK ∈ EK is the restriction of f to K × Z (we dismiss now the equivalence class notation used in the proof of Lemma B.3, as there is no possible confusion here, as the equivalence relation is M , defined prior to Lemma B.3). It is clear that φ is linear and one-to-one, since f 6= 0 implies that there is K ∈ K such that fK 6= 0. It is also suprajective, since, under our hypotheses on X, Z and Q, every function fK in EK can be extended to a Carath´eodory function f K : X × Z −→ R, see Kucia (1998), Corollary 3. Consider the function f (x, z) = f K(x, z) if x ∈ K. This definition is consistent, since for another compact set K ′, if x ∈ K ∩ K ′, then f K(x, z) = fK∩K ′(x, z) = f K ′ (x, z). Moreover, f is a Carath´eodory function: for each z ∈ Z, the restriction of f to a compact set K is continuous; hence, since X is locally compact, f is continuous; see Willard (1970), Lemma 43.10. Also, it is trivial that f is Borel measurable with respect to z. Hence, for any (fK)K∈K ∈ P , we have proved the existence of a function f in E for which φ(f ) = (fK)K∈K, and hence φ is suprajective. It remains to show that φ is continuous and that it is open. Let πK : P → EK be the projection of E onto EK, defined as follows: if f ∈ E, then πK(f ) = fK. The mappings πK are continuous by definition of the Tychonoff topology. Note that πK ◦ φ = πK, hence by Schaefer (1971) (II.5.2), φ is continuous. Moreover, from the previous identity, πK ◦ φ−1 = πK, hence by the same argument as above, φ−1 is continuous. C Continuity of the Markov operator In this section we investigate the continuity of the fixed point of the Bellman operator in the variables (x, z). Our exploration is not the most general possible. We restrict ourselves to a case which is common 28 in many models in economics. General results about the continuity of the Markov operator M can be consulted in Serfozo (1982) and Hern´andez-Lerma and Lasserre (2000). We state the following simple result. Lemma C.1. Let f ∈ L1(Z; C(X)). Suppose that there is a σ-finite measure λ on Z such that Qz is absolutely continuous with respect to λ, for all z ∈ Z, with density (or Radon-Nicodym derivative) ϕ(z, z′), continuous with respect to z and such that, for all compact set K1 in X and K2 in Z, there exists a function h ∈ L1(Z) such that f (x, z′)ϕ(z, z′) ≤ h(z′) for almost all z′ ∈ Z and all x ∈ K1, z ∈ K2. Then M f is continuous in (x, z). Proof. The assumptions on Q imply M f (x, z) =ZZ f (x, z′)Qz(dz′) =ZZ f (x, z′)ϕ(z, z′)λ(dz′). Theorem 20.3 in Aliprantis, and Burkinshaw (1990) applies to f (x, z′)ϕ(z, z′), hence M f is continuous. The issue of continuity of the value function in the unbounded case (and unbounded space of shocks) is not an easy one. The translation of Lemma 12.14 in Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989) to this case is not straightforward, even if the Markov chain is strong Feller continuous. Recall that Q has the weak (strong) Feller property if M maps bounded continuous functions (resp. bounded measurable functions) on Z into bounded continuous functions. To see the kind of problems that may emerge for unbounded functions, consider the following example. Let Z = [0, ∞) and let the transition function Q : Z × Z −→ R be defined as follows: Q(0, B) = δ0(B), where δ0 is the Dirac measure at the point 0, that is, δ0(B) = 1 if 0 ∈ B and δ0(B) = 0 otherwise. For 0 < z < 1, Q(z, B) =RB dFz(z′), where Fz(z′) = 0, z′z2 + 1 − z, 1, if z′ = 0; if 0 < z′ ≤ 1 z ; if z′ > 1 z . , Finally, for z ≥ 1, Q(z, B) = λ(B ∩ [0, 1]), where λ denotes the Lebesgue measure of R. Note that, for 0 < z < 1, Fz is a distribution function: it is nondecreasing, continuous except at 0, where the right sided limit exists, 0 ≤ Fz ≤ 1, and Z dF (z′) = (z′z2 + 1 − z − 0)z′=0 +Z 1 0 z z2dz′ = 1 − z + z = 1. Moreover, it is clear that Q(·, B) is Borel measurable. Thus, Q is a transition function. Let f (y, z) = f (z) be independent of y and continuous in z. Then M f is well defined in this particular example and 29 depends only on z, with (M f )(0) =R f (z′)Q(0, dz′) = f (0). For 0 < z < 1 we have (M f )(z) =Z f (z′)Q(z, dz′) =Z f (z′)dFz(z′) = f (0)(z′z2 + 1 − z − 0)z′=0 +Z 1 = f (0)(1 − z) + z2Z 1 f (z′)dz′. 0 0 z z f (z′)z2dz′ Note that as f is continuous, the integral above exists, for any 0 < z < 1 and M f is continuous for 0 < z < 1. For z ≥ 1, M f is constant and given by (M f )(z) =Z f (z′)Q(z, dz′) =Z[0,1] f (z′)dz′. z 0 f (z′)dz′ ≤ 0 f (z′)dz′ tends to 0 as z → 0+, and then (M f )(z) tends to f (0) = (M f )(0). Also, Now, if f is measurable and bounded, there is k > 0 such that f ≤ k, hence −kz2z−1 ≤R 1 kz2z−1, so R 1 (M f )(z) tends toR[0,1] f (z′)dz′ = (M f )(1) as z → 1−. Thus M f is continuous. Thereby, Q is strong Feller continuous. However, considering the unbounded function g(z′) = z′, we obtain M g(0) = g(0) = 0 and M g(z) = 1 2 for z > 0, thus M g is discontinuous at 0. z It is not difficult to find non -- trivial continuous functions U for which the dynamic programming equation with transition probability Q admits discontinuous solutions. For instance, let u(z, c) = (1 + z)c be an utility function that depends on consumption c and shock z, and let Γ(m) = [0, m + y], where m ≥ 0, y > 0 is a constant,X = R+, Z = [0, ∞], and let a discount factor β such that 3 2 β < 1. The dynamic programming equation is v(m, z) = max m′ ∈[0,m+y]n(1 + z)(m + y − m′) + βZ[1,∞) v(m′, z′)Qz(dz′)o, Notice that this specification corresponds to a pure currency economy model with linear utility, where agents' preferences are subject to random shocks. These random shocks are assumed to be governed by the Markov chain Q described above. See Stokey and Lucas with Prescott (1989) for further details about this model. We are simply interested in showing that the value function is not jointly continuous in (m, z). It is easily checked that v(m, z) =( m + y + y β (1 + z)(m + y) + 3 1−β , 2 y β 1−β , if z = 0; if z > 0, is a solution in the class Ca(R+ × R+), which is not continuous in z. Acknowledgements Support from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci´on y Universidades -- Agencia Estatal de Investigaci´on, grants ECO2017-86261-P, MDM 2014-0431 and Comunidad de Madrid (Spain), grant MadEco-CM S2015/HUM-3444 is gratefully acknowledged. 30 References Aliprantis, C. D. and Burkinshaw, O. (1990). Principles of Real Analysis. Second edition. Aca- demic Press, London. ´Alvarez, F. and Stokey, N. L. (1998). Dynamic programming with homogeneous functions. J. Econ. Theory 82, 167 -- 189. Balbus, L., Reffett, K. and Wozny, L. P. (2018). On uniqueness of time -- consistent Markov policies for quasi -- hyperbolic consumers under uncertainty. J. Econ. Theory, forthcoming. Becker, R. A. and Boyd III, J. H. (1997). Capital Theory, Equilibrium Analysis and Recursive Utility. Blackwell, London. Bertsekas, D. P. and Shreve, S.E. (1978). Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete -- Time Case. Academic Press Inc., New York. Binder, M. and Pesaran, M. H. (1999). Stochastic growth models and their econometric implica- tions. J. Econ. Growth 4 139 -- 183. Blackwell, D. (1965). Discounted dynamic programming. Ann. Appl. Stat. 36 226 -- 235. Bogachev, V.I. and Smolyanov, O. G. (2017). Topological Vector Spaces and Their Applications. Springer Verlag. Boyd III, J. H. (1990). Recursive utility and the Ramsey problem. J. Econ. Theory 50 326 -- 345. Brock, W. A. and Mirman, L. J. (1972). Optimal economic growth and uncertainty: the discounted case. J. Econ. Theory 4 479 -- 513. Danthine, J. P. and Donaldson, J. B. (1981). Stochastic properties of fast vs. slow growing economies. Econometrica 49 1007 -- 1033. Dieudonn´e. J. (1974). ´El´ements d'analyse. Tome II. Gauthier -- Villars, Paris. Donaldson, J. B. and Mehra, R. (1983). Stochastic growth with correlated production shocks. J. Econ. Theory 29 282 -- 312. Furukawa, N. (1972). Markovian decision processes with compact action spaces. Ann. Math. Statist. 43 1612 -- 1622. Hadzi´c, O. and Stankovi´c, B. (1969). Some theorems on the fixed points in locally convex spaces. Publications de L'institut Math´ematique 24 9 -- 19. Hern´andez-Lerma, O. and Lasserre, J. B. (1999). Further Topics on Discrete-Time Markov Control Processes. Springer, New York. 31 Hern´andez-Lerma, O. and Lasserre, J. B. (2000). Fatou's and Lebesgue's convergence theorems for measures. J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal. 13 137-146. Hopenhayn, H. A. and Prescott, E. C. (1992). Stochastic monotonicity and stationary distribu- tions for dynamic economies. Econometrica 1387 -- 1406. Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E., Siu, H. E. and Stacchetti, E. (2005). Fluctuations in convex models of endogenous growth, I: Growth effects. Rev. Econ. Dynam. 8 780-804. Kamihigashi, T. (2007). Stochastic optimal growth with bounded or unbounded utility and with bounded or unbounded shocks. J. Math. Econ. 43 477 -- 500. Kozlov, V., Thim, J. and Turesson, B. O. (2010). A fixed point theorem in locally convex spaces. Collect. Math. 61 223 -- 239. Kucia, A. (1998). Some results on Carath´eodory selections and extensions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 223 302 -- 318. Lucas Jr, R. E. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46 1429 -- 1445. Ma, Q. and Stachurski, J. (2017). Optimal timing of decisions: A general theory based on contin- uation values. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:1703.09832v1. Maitra, A. (1968). Discounted dynamic programming on compact metric spaces. Sankhya Ser. A 30 211 -- 216. Majumdar, M., Mitra T. and Nyarko, Y. (1989). Dynamic optimization under uncertainty: non- convex feasible set. In: Feiwel, G. R. (ed.) Joan Robinson and modern economic theory 545 -- 590. London: Macmillan Press. Martins da Rocha, V. F. and Vailakis, Y. (2010). Existence and uniqueness of a fixed point for local contractions. Econometrica 78 1127 -- 1141. Matkowski, I. J. and Nowak, I. (2011). On discounted dynamic programming with unbounded returns. Econ. Theory 46 455 -- 474. Mirman, l. J. and Zilcha, I. (1975). On optimal growth under uncertainty. J. Econ. Theory 11 329-339. Mitra, K. (1998). On capital accumulation paths in a neoclassical stochastic growth model. Econ. Theory 11 457 -- 464. Olson, L. J. and Roy, S. (2006). Theory of stochastic optimal economic growth. In Handbook on Optimal Growth 1, 297 -- 335. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. Rinc´on-Zapatero, J. P. and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero, C. (2003). Existence and uniqueness of solu- tions to the Bellman equation in the unbounded case. Econometrica 71 1519 -- 1556. 32 Rinc´on-Zapatero, J. P. and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero, C. (2007). Recursive utility with unbounded aggregators. Econ. Theory 33 381 -- 391. Rinc´on-Zapatero, J. P. and Rodr´ıguez-Palmero, C. (2009). Corrigendum to "Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Bellman equation in the unbounded case". Econometrica 77 317 -- 3186. Schaefer, H. H. (1971). Topological Vector Spaces. Springer, New York, NY. Serfozo, R. (1982). Convergence of Lebesgue integrals with varying measures. Sankhya: The Indian J. of Stats. 44 380-402. Stachurski, J. (2002). Stochastic optimal growth with unbounded shock. J. Econ. Theory 106 40-65. Stokey, N. and Lucas, R. E. with Prescott, E. C. (1989). Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Willard, S. (1970). General Topology. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts. Wong, J. S. W. (1968). Two extensions of the Banach contraction mapping principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 22 438 -- 443. 33
1808.01351	1	1808	2018-08-03T20:52:23	A characterization of "Phelpsian" statistical discrimination	[ "econ.TH" ]	We establish that statistical discrimination is possible if and only if it is impossible to uniquely identify the signal structure observed by an employer from a realized empirical distribution of skills. The impossibility of statistical discrimination is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a fair, skill-dependent, remuneration for workers. Finally, we connect the statistical discrimination literature to Bayesian persuasion, establishing that if discrimination is absent, then the optimal signaling problem results in a linear payoff function (as well as a kind of converse).	econ.TH	econ	A CHARACTERIZATION OF "PHELPSIAN" STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION CHRISTOPHER P. CHAMBERS AND FEDERICO ECHENIQUE Abstract. We establish that statistical discrimination is possi- ble if and only if it is impossible to uniquely identify the signal structure observed by an employer from a realized empirical dis- tribution of skills. The impossibility of statistical discrimination is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a fair, skill-dependent, remuneration for workers. Finally, we connect the statistical dis- crimination literature to Bayesian persuasion, establishing that if discrimination is absent, then the optimal signaling problem results in a linear payoff function (as well as a kind of converse). 1. Introduction In seminal contributions, Arrow (1971; 1973) and Phelps (1972) pos- tulated that discrimination along racial lines, or gender identities, can have a statistical explanation. In this note we focus on Phelps' no- tion of statistical discrimination: on the idea that two populations of workers, who are in essence identical, may have different economic re- munerations for purely informational reasons.1 Phelps' theory connects worker remuneration with the distribution of signals that can be observed about worker skills. Phelps assumes a firm who observes a signal about the underlying skills of a worker. The firm observes the signal before assigning the worker to a task. The worker (Chambers) Department of Economics, Georgetown University (Echenique) Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology Echenique thanks the NSF for support through the grants SES-1558757 and CNS- 1518941. We are grateful to Leeat Yariv for comments on a previous draft. 1 We follow the interpretation of Phelps' model due to Aigner and Cain (1977). Arrow's theory of statistical discrimination relies on a coordination failure, and is quite different from Phelps'. Statistical discrimination stands in contrast with taste-based discrimination, as in Becker (1957). 1 2 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE is paid her expected contribution to the firm, conditional on the firm's observed signal about the worker. (A competitive market ensures that workers are paid their contributions.) Consider now two populations of workers: group A and group B. If the signal is more informative for As than for Bs, then (the argument goes), a worker from group A may be ex-ante more valuable to the firm than a B worker. This is because the additional information about the A worker may be used to better assign her a task matching her skills. Even more, the signal may be the result of a test that has been designed with a population from group A in mind. The signal implemented by the test will then be more informative about the skills of a prospective A worker than a B worker.2 As a consequence of the difference in informativeness, the firm may value a group A worker over a group B worker. We formulate the theory of statistical discrimination using the language of the recent literature on informational design. A firm observes a signal about a worker's skills, and bases both the assigned task and the payment to the worker on the revenue it expects to gain from the action taken by the worker at the firm. A group of workers comes with a distribution over signals: an information structure. The distribution over signals of group A may be more informative than the distribution over signals of group B. We say that statistical discrimination is present if two groups of workers, each group having their distinct distribution over signals, but the same distribution of skills, receive different payments in expectation. Our contribution is to connect statistical discrimination with two seemingly distinct properties of the economic environment: one is iden- tification (in the econometric sense) of signals from skills, and the other is the linearity of firm revenue in "fair" skill-dependent payoffs. First, we show that the absence of statistical discrimination is equivalent to 2As an example, Aigner and Cain cite evidence from the education literature to the effect that the SAT is less informative about the abilities of African-American students than it is for white students. STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 3 the econometric identification of signals. Specifically, we prove that sta- tistical discrimination is not possible if and only if every given distribu- tion of skills arises from a unique distribution of signals. By definition, when discrimination is possible, the identification property must be vi- olated. Our contribution is in the converse: whenever identification is impossible, discrimination can arise. Second, we show that identification, and therefore the absence of discrimination, is equivalent to the existence of a fair skill-based remu- neration for workers. Workers' payments are a linear combination of the fair remunerations. Each list of skills must be associated with a value, which is independent of any signals, and every worker is paid the expectation according to the distribution of skills inherent in her realized signal. Finally, we show that the optimal information structure in the sense of Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011) achieves precisely the fair remuner- ation in our results. 2. The model 2.1. Notation. A set is binary it is has one or two elements. If A is a closed subset of a Euclidean space, we denote by ∆(A) the set of Borel probability measures on A. 2.2. The model. The model involves a firm and a worker. The firm faces uncertainty over the revenues it can obtain from the worker's actions. The firm's revenue depends on the worker's skills, and how those skills match up with the technology of the firm. Let Θ denote a finite set of uncertain states of the world ; these states represent the skill set of the worker, and are unknown to the firm. The firm asks the worker to undertake some action, and it only cares about the state-contingent payoff that results from the worker's action. Formally, then, an action is an element a ∈ RΘ. Thus, the task of the firm is to properly match a worker to an action with the appropriate skill set. 4 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE There is a closed set of signals, or payoff-relevant types, S ⊆ ∆(Θ). Here we identify signals with the posterior distribution that they induce over Θ. The firm observes s ∈ S before asking the worker to undertake an action. Thus, the goal of the firm is to choose the appropriate action for the appropriate worker, after a signal of worker skill has been observed. The firm solves the following problem. For a given s ∈ S, and finite set of actions A, vA(s) ≡ max a∈A Xθ∈Θ a(θ)s(θ). Given signal s ∈ S, vA(s) is the maximal expected revenue the em- ployer can achieve. We maintain the assumption that labor markets are competitive, and therefore a worker of type s is paid the revenue vA(s) that she generates for the firm. This is as in Phelps (1972) and Aigner and Cain (1977). Observe that vA is the "value function" of A, as in Blackwell (1953) or Machina (1984), and is thus always convex. It induces a A probability π ∈ ∆(S) is an information structure. probability over Θ via: pπ(θ) = RS s(θ)dπ(s). For a set E ⊆ S, we can interpret π(E) as an empirical frequency of individuals who generate signals s ∈ E. The empirical frequency π then generates an empirical frequency of skills, which is pπ. We say that the set of signals S is non-discriminatory if for any information structures π, π′ ∈ ∆(S), and any finite set A ⊆ RΘ, if pπ = pπ′, then ZS vA(t)dπ(t) = ZS vA(t)dπ′(t). Interpret π(E) as the frequency of individuals of type E ⊆ S. Under the competitive markets assumption, the set S being non-discriminatory means that the average remuneration paid to a class of workers with dis- tribution π ultimately depends only on the distribution of their skills. 2.3. Motivation and a Phelpsian example. We start by a simple example to recreate the point made by Phelps (1972). It is a min- imal example; the simplest we can think of that delivers the Phelp- sian message. Let Θ = {θ1, θ2, θ3} be the set of states, and A = STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 5 {(1, 0, 0), (0, 1/2, 3))} be the set of available actions. Observe that with this specification, workers are not "high" or "low" quality, but they simply have differing aptitudes for the available actions. Suppose that S = {(1, 0, 0), (1/2, 1/2, 0), (0, 1/2, 1/2), (0, 0, 1)} is the set of signals, or worker types. Consider two information structures, π and π′, described in the table below, together with the profit function vA resulting from our assumed Θ and A: t = (1, 0, 0) t = (1/2, 1/2, 0) t = (0, 1/2, 1/2) t = (0, 0, 1) π(t) π′(t) vA(t) 1/3 0 1 0 2/3 1/2 2/3 0 7/4 0 1/3 3 There are two populations of workers, say A and B. The two popula- tions differ in the information that the firm obtains about their skills. The workers might take a test, as in Phelps (1972), and the informa- tional content of the test might be different for the two populations. So As emit signals about their skills as given by π, while Bs distribution over signals is π′. Observe that pπ = pπ′ = (1/3, 1/3, 1/3), reflecting that the populations overall have the same skills. A worker from group A reveals that she is either good for action a1 = (1, 0, 0) or action a2 = (0, 1/3, 3). The B worker reveals the same kind of information, but less efficiently: a signal t = (1/2, 1/2, 0) tells the employer that a1 is the optimal choice given the information at hand, but leaves the employer with some doubts as to whether a2 may have been the optimal action. In consequence, we have ZT vA(t)dπ(t) = 1/3 + 7/6 > 1/3 + 1 = ZT vA(t)dπ′(t). If workers are paid according to the revenues that they contribute to the firm, as would be the case in a competitive market, then A workers are paid more than B workers in aggregate. The differences in expected 6 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE (or population) remuneration between the two is purely a consequence of the informational content in their corresponding signal structures. In our example of Phelpsian statistical discrimination, the two dif- ferent information structures have the same mean. This is a necessary requirement for the existence of statistical discrimination. It is impor- tant to point out, however, that skill can always be inferred from wages, even when there is discrimination. We present Proposition 1 to make this point. For a set of actions A = {a1, . . . , an}, and action k, let A + k = {a1 + k, . . . , an + k}. Proposition 1. For any S and any set of actions A, if π, π′ ∈ ∆(S) for which pπ 6= pπ′, then there is k for which ZT vA+k(t)dπ(t) 6= ZT vA+k(t)dπ′(t). 2.4. When discrimination is impossible. Our discussion suggests that discrimination is tied to identification. Skills are always identified from payoffs, even when there is discrimination (Proposition 1). The problem is the converse identification: Here we show that the absence of discrimination is equivalent to the ability to estimate skills from signals. Importantly, we show that this can only happen when payments are linear in signals. So the absence of discrimination is equivalent to the existence of a state-dependent, signal-independent, "fair" payoff. Payments equal the expected value of such a payoff, and are called fair valuations. We say that S • is identified if for any π, π′ ∈ ∆(S), if pπ = pπ′, then π = π′; • admits fair valuations if for any finite subset A ⊆ RΘ, there is αA ∈ RΘ for which for all t ∈ S, vA(t) = Xθ αA(θ)t(θ). • admits fair valuations for binary sets if for any binary subset A ⊆ RΘ, there is αA ∈ RΘ for which for all t ∈ S, vA(t) = Pθ αA(θ)t(θ). STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 7 The notion that S admits fair valuations captures the idea that any individual is paid according to her expected skill. Thus, for A, αA(θ) represents the value to the firm with technology A of skill set θ ∈ Θ, and if an individual sends signal s then she is paid the expected value of αA according to s. Importantly, if π ∈ ∆(S), then Z vA(s)dπ(s) = αA ·Z sdπ(s) = αA · pπ. So, under fair valuations, the expected payment to a population of agents with information structure π only depends on the distribution of skills in that population. Finally, say that S is non-discriminatory for binary sets if for any π, π′ ∈ ∆(S) and any binary A ⊆ RΘ, if pπ = pπ′, then ZS vA(t)dπ(t) = ZS vA(t)dπ′(t). Theorem 2. The following are equivalent. (1) S is non-discriminatory. (2) S is non-discriminatory for binary sets. (3) S is identified. (4) S admits fair valuations. (5) S admits fair valuations for binary sets. The main import of Theorem 2 is that there is a αA, independent of the signal s, so that the optimal contribution of the worker to the firm is the expected value of αA. The worker is therefore remunerated ac- cording to some "fundamental" value αA, and receives the expectation of αA according to the signal s. Proposition 3. If S admits fair valuations, then for each finite A ⊆ RΘ and corresponding αA ∈ RΘ, we have for every s∗ ∈ S: Xθ αA(θ)s∗(θ) = inf{Xθ y(θ)s∗(θ) : y ∈ RΘ and vA(s) ≤ Xθ y(θ)s(θ)∀s ∈ S}. Proposition 3 means that the value of a worker with type s∗ to the firm is the minimum expected payment that guarantees the worker a payoff of at least vA(s), for all signals s ∈ S. This is a kind of 8 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE participation, or individual rationality, constraint. The worker may be able to guarantee a payment of vA(s) on the market, if her signal is s, and thus a firm must guarantee at least vA(s) in its choice of the "fair" payoff αA ∈ RΘ. 2.5. Connection to Bayesian persuasion. The recent literature on Bayesian persuasion (Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011)) deals with the optimal design of information structures. It turns out that the value of optimal information design is linear if and only if S admits no dis- crimination. We now focus a bit more in depth on the notion of signal structure. As in Blackwell (1953), there is a natural notion of "comparative in- formativeness" for π, π′ ∈ ∆(S). We say that π is more informative than π′ if for every A, R vA(t)dπ(t) ≥ R vA(t)dπ′(t). Most economists will have heard of the notion of a "mean-preserving spread;" π turns out to be more informative than π′ if it consists of a mean-preserving spread of π′. We know that optimal information design will never utilize signal structures that are dominated according to the more informativeness order. As a result, optimal information structures will place probability zero on signals that can be obtained as the mean of other signals. Formally, an optimal information structure will have support on the extreme points of the convex hull of S. Now, let T be the closed convex hull of S. An information structure is any probability measure π ∈ ∆(T ). Then define WA : T → R via WA(s) ≡ max{ZT vA(s)dπ(s) : π ∈ ∆(T ) and s = ZT sdπ(s)}. WA(s) is the value of an optimal information structure for a population with skill distribution s. In the following, ∂T denotes the extreme points of T ; those points which are not convex combinations of other points in T . Return to our motivating "Phelpsian" example. There, discrimina- tion was present even though S consisted of the extreme points of its convex hull T , and thus S was maximally informative. Phelps' original STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 9 point can thus be refined: discrimination obtains because an employer has "different" information about two classes of individuals, rather than "better" information. Let us see how this manifests itself in the choice of optimal infor- mation structure. In this case, for each s ∈ S, we have (clearly) WA(s) = vA(s), as each s is extreme in the convex hull of T . We therefore obtain: (2/3)WA(1/2, 1/2, 0) + (1/3)WA(0, 0, 1) = 4 2 = (1/3)vA(1, 0, 0) + (2/3)vA(0, 1/2, 1/2) ≤ WA(1/3, 1/3, 1/3). 3 < 3 Hence, WA is nonlinear in this case. This is a general artifact of non-identification and discrimination, as is evidenced by the following result. Corollary 4. For any S, ∂T is non-discriminatory iff for every A, WA is affine (linear).3 As in Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011), WA is always weakly concave, which admits the possibility that it is affine. Corollary 4 says that discrimination is possible exactly when WA exhibits strict concavities. 3. Conclusion We have formulated Phelps' theory of statistical discrimination us- ing the modern language of information design. Our results shed new light on the nature of discrimination, and on some of the empirical approaches one might take to establish the existence of statistical dis- crimination. Statistical discrimination turns out to be equivalent to the absence of econometric identification of signals from skills. While the identifi- cation of skills from salaries is always possible, even in the presence of discrimination, we show that the crucial identification property is that of signals from skills. In second place, we connect discrimination with the source of worker remunerations. We show that identification is impossible if and only if 3Because the domain of WA is a set of probability measures, WA is linear if it is αA(θ)s(θ), where αA is as in affine. In fact, in this case we have WA(s) = Pθ∈Θ Proposition 3. 10 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE remunerations are linear in "fair" skill-dependent, signal-independent, payoffs. Our results have immediate consequences for empirical research on discrimination. They imply that discrimination is absent if and only if empirical approaches to linearly estimating fair skills-based payoffs are viable. 4. Proofs Let T be the closed convex hull of S. Recall that ∂T denotes the extreme points of T . The definition of vA extends to T . Let YA : T → R be the concave envelope of vA, defined as the pointwise infimum of the affine functions that dominate vA. So if A(T ) denotes the space of all affine functions on T , then vA(t) = inf{l(t) : l ∈ A(T ) and vA ≤ l}. Recall the definition of WA from Section 2.5. Lemma 5. YA = WA Proof. Let l : T → R be an affine function and vA ≤ l. For any π ∈ ∆(T ) with RT qdπ(q) = p, vA(q)dπ(q) ≤ ZT ZT l(q)dπ(q) = l(cid:18)ZT qdπ(q)(cid:19) = l(p), as l is affine. Thus WA ≤ l, as π was arbitrary. This implies that WA ≤ YA, as l was arbitrary. Now suppose that WA(p) < YA(p). Recall that WA is concave. Then the set D = {(q, y) ∈ T ×R : y ≤ WA(q)} is closed and convex, so there exists α with (q, y) · α ≤ (p, WA(p)) · α < (p, y′) · α for all (q, y) ∈ D and all y′ ≥ YA(p). Write α = (α1, α2) ∈ RΘ × R. Clearly we cannot have α2 = 0 as (p, WA(p) ∈ D. Consider the affine function l : T → R defined by q 7→ (1/α2)((p, WA(p)) · α − α1 · q). This means that l(p) = WA(p) < YA(p). Moreover, for any q ∈ T , α · (q, WA(q)) ≤ α · (p, WA(p)); hence, l(q) = (1/α2)α1 · p + WA(p) − (1/α2)α1 · q ≥ WA(q) ≥ vA(q), STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 11 where the last inequality follows from the definition of WA. Then l ∈ A(T ), vA ≤ l, and l(p) < YA(p); a contradiction. (cid:3) 4.1. Proof of Theorem 2. By the Choquet-Meyer Theorem (Theo- rem II.3.7 in Alfsen (2012) or p. 56-57 in Phelps (2000)), T is a simplex iff ∂T is identified. Now, to prove the theorem: it is obvious that 3 =⇒ 1 =⇒ 2. We shall prove that 2 =⇒ 3. To this end, let S be non-discriminatory for binary menus. The proof that 2 =⇒ 3 has two parts. The first is to show that S = ∂T . The second is that T must be a simplex. First, it is obvious by definition of T that ∂T ⊆ S. So we prove that S ⊆ ∂T . To this end, suppose by means of contradiction that there is s∗ ∈ S for which there are t, t′ ∈ T , t 6= t′, and γ ∈ (0, 1) for which s∗ = γt + (1 − γ)t′. Let f = (s∗ − t) + [t · s∗ − s∗ · s∗]1 and g = −f . Observe that f · s∗ = 0, g · t = −t · (s∗ − t) − s∗ · (t − s∗) > 0 and f · t′ = (s∗ − t) · (t′ − s∗) = γ(1 − γ)(t′ − s∗) · (t′ − s∗) > 0. Let A ≡ {f, g}. Then we obtain that vA(t) ≥ g · t > 0, vA(t′) ≥ f · t′ > 0, while vA(s∗) = 0 (as f · s∗ = g · s∗ = 0). Now, for each of t, t′, there are finitely supported (by Caratheodory's theorem) πt and πt′ on ∂T (so in particular on S) for which t = RS sdπ(s) and t′ = RS sdπ′(s). This means thatRS vA(s)dπ(s) ≥ vA(t) > 0 and RS vA(s)dπ′(s) ≥ vA(t′) > 0, as vA is convex. Then ZS vA(s)d(γπ + (1 − γ)π′)(s) > 0. But this contradicts 2 as RS sd(γπ + (1 − γ)π′)(s) = γt + (1 − γ)t′ = s∗ and vA(s∗) = 0. So we have shown that S = ∂T , and we turn to the proof that T is a simplex (and thus S identified). By Alfsen (2012) Theorem II.4.1, since T is convex and compact, T is a simplex if and only if A(T ) forms a lattice in the usual (pointwise) ordering on functions. So, suppose by means of contradiction that A(T ) does not form a lattice. Then, there are f, g ∈ A(T ) which possess no supremum in A(T ). 12 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE Lemma 6. Let f, g ∈ A(T ). For any z ∈ ∂T , if f (z) ≥ g(z), then there is h ∈ A(T ) for which h ≥ f, g and h(z) = f (z). Proof. Let M be the subgraph of the concave envelope of v{f,g}. Ob- serve by definition that it is the convex hull of the points {(z, v{f,g}) : z ∈ S}, so that it is polyhedral (Corollary 19.I.2 of Rockafellar (1970)). Therefore, by definition of polyhedral concave function, there is h sup- porting it at (z, f (z)). (cid:3) From Lemma 6, and the fact that f and g possess no supremum in A(T ), it follows that there is no affine function h for which for all z ∈ ∂T , h(z) = max{f (z), g(z)}. Consequently, if A ≡ {f, g}, then YA is not affine, since for all z ∈ ∂T , it follows that YA(z) = max{f (z), g(z)} = vA(z). Now, YA being concave and not affine means that there is π ∈ ∆(T ) with RS YA(q)dπ(q) < YA(pπ). Since S = ∂T , and YA is concave, we can in fact find (by Lemma 4.1 in Phelps (2000)) π ∈ ∆(S) with pπ = pπ and ZS vA(q)dπ(q) = ZS YA(q)dπ(q) ≤ ZS YA(q)dπ(q) < YA(pπ) = YA(pπ), where the first equality follows from vA(q) = YA(q) for q ∈ S, and the second inequality from the choice of π. pπ}. Then there is π′ ∈ ∆(S) (as the sup is achieved for a measure with Now, by Lemma 5, YA(pπ) = sup{R vA(q)dπ(q) : π ∈ ∆(T ) and pπ = support in ∂T = S) with pπ = pπ′ and RS vA(q)dπ(q) < RS vA(q)dπ′(q), contradicting the fact that S is non-discriminatory for binary menus. 4.2. Proof of Proposition 3. The Lagrangian for the maximization problem in the definition of WA is L(π, λ) = ZT vA(t)dπ(t) + λ ·(cid:20)p −ZT qdπ(q)(cid:21) = λ · p +ZT (vA(t) − λ · p)dπ(t) and apply the maximin theorem (see for example Theorem 6.2.7 in Aubin and Ekeland (2006), which applies here because ∆(T ) is com- pact). STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION 13 4.3. Proof of Proposition 1. Observe that for any A and any action l, we have vA+l(t) = vA(t) + l · t. Now, since pπ 6= pπ′, there is l for which l · pπ 6= l · pπ′. Consequently, there is α for which: αl · (pπ − pπ′) 6= ZT vA(t)dπ′(t) −ZT vA(t)dπ(t). Let k = αl, and conclude that: ZT vA+k(t)dπ(t) = k·pπ+ZT vA(t)dπ(t) 6= k·pπ′+ZT vA(t)dπ′(t) = ZT vA+k(t)dπ′(t). 4.4. Proof of Corollary 4. By the Choquet-Meyers Theorem (The- orem II.3.7 in Alfsen (2012)) T is a simplex iff the concave envelope of every lower semicontinuous and convex function is affine. Clearly, when S is identified, T is a simplex, and since vA is convex and lower semicontinuous, we obtain that WA = YA, the concave envelope. So WA is affine. Conversely, suppose that WA is affine for each finite A. We will show that T is a simplex (so that ∂T forms the vertices of a simplex, and is identified). But this again follows from the fact that WA is the smallest concave function on T dominating each a ∈ A. Since it is affine, it follows that A(T ) is a lattice, and hence T is a simplex. References Aigner, D. J. and G. G. Cain (1977): "Statistical theories of dis- crimination in labor markets," Industrial and Labor Relations Re- view, 30, 175 -- 187. Alfsen, E. M. (2012): Compact convex sets and boundary integrals, vol. 57, Springer Science & Business Media. Arrow, K. J. (1971): "Some models of Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market," Tech. Rep. RM-6253-RC, RAND. -- -- -- (1973): The Theory of Discrimination. S. 3 -- 33 in: O. Ashen- felter/A. Rees (Hrsg.), Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton University Press. Aubin, J.-P. and I. Ekeland (2006): Applied nonlinear analysis, Courier Corporation. 14 CHAMBERS AND ECHENIQUE Becker, G. S. (1957): The Theory of Discrimination, University of Chicago Press. Blackwell, D. (1953): "Equivalent comparisons of experiments," The annals of mathematical statistics, 265 -- 272. Kamenica, E. and M. Gentzkow (2011): "Bayesian persuasion," American Economic Review, 101, 2590 -- 2615. Machina, M. J. (1984): "Temporal risk and the nature of induced preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, 33, 199 -- 231. Phelps, E. S. (1972): "The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism," American Economic Review, 62, 659 -- 661. Phelps, R. R. (2000): Lectures on Choquet's theorem, second edition, Springer Science & Business Media. Rockafellar, R. T. (1970): Convex analysis, Princeton university press.
1912.12787	1	1912	2019-12-30T02:40:47	On an Extension of a Theorem of Eilenberg and a Characterization of Topological Connectedness	[ "econ.TH", "math.GN" ]	On taking a non-trivial and semi-transitive bi-relation constituted by two (hard and soft) binary relations, we report a (i) p-continuity assumption that guarantees the completeness and transitivity of its soft part, and a (ii) characterization of a connected topological space in terms of its attendant properties on the space. Our work generalizes antecedent results in applied mathematics, all following Eilenberg (1941), and now framed in the context of a parametrized-topological space. This re-framing is directly inspired by the continuity assumption in Wold (1943-44) and the mixture-space structure proposed in Herstein and Milnor (1953), and the unifying synthesis of these pioneering but neglected papers that it affords may have independent interest.	econ.TH	econ	On an Extension of a Theorem of Eilenberg and a Characterization of Topological Connectedness∗ M. Ali Khan† r(cid:13) Metin Uyanık‡ December 24, 2019 Abstract: On taking a non-trivial and semi-transitive bi-relation constituted by two (hard and soft) binary relations, we report a (i) p-continuity assumption that guarantees the com- pleteness and transitivity of its soft part, and a (ii) characterization of a connected topological space in terms of its attendant properties on the space. Our work generalizes antecedent re- sults in applied mathematics, all following Eilenberg (1941), and now framed in the context of a parametrized-topological space. This re-framing is directly inspired by the continuity assump- tion in Wold (1943 -- 44) and the mixture-space structure proposed in Herstein and Milnor (1953), and the unifying synthesis of these pioneering but neglected papers that it affords may have independent interest. Mathematics Subject Classification. 91B55, 37E05. Key Words: Bi-relation, non-trivial, semi-transitive, complete, transitive, connected, p-continuity, parametrically-topologized space ∗The two theorems reported here were announced without proof at the 2019 NSF/NBER/CEME Conference on Mathematical Economics: In Honor of Robert M. Anderson in Berkeley, October 25, 2019; and more compre- hensively, at a departmental seminar at the Australian National University on December 17, 2019. The authors acknowledge with gratitude extended correspondence and conversation with Professors Max Amarante, Yorgos Gerasimou, Alfio Giarlotta, Farhad Husseinov, Michael Mandler, Rich McLean and Debraj Ray. Needless to say, all errors of reading and interpretation are solely the authors'. We use the certified random order in order to list the authors; see Ray-Robson (2018, American Economic Review). †Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: [email protected]. ‡School of Economics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072. Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-0224-7851 1 Introduction The question considered in this paper concerns a binary relation R on a set X conceived as a subset of X × X, with its transpose, and upper and lower section at x ∈ X respectively defined as R−1 = {(x, y) (y, x) ∈ R}, R(x) = {y (x, y) ∈ R}, and R−1(x) = {y (y, x) ∈ R}. With ∆ = {(x, x)x ∈ X}, Rc the complement of R, its symmetric and asymmetric parts respectively denoted as I = R ∩ R−1, and P = R\R−1, I ∩ P = emptyset, and R = I ∪ P, we let the composition R ◦ R′ be given by (y, x) ∈ R ◦ R′ if R−1(x) ∩ R′(y) 6= ∅, for any two relations R, R′ on a X, and call a relation R on X non-trivial if P 6= ∅, semi-transitive if I ◦ P ⊆ P and P ◦ I ⊆ P , transitive if R ◦ R ⊆ R, (negatively transitive if Rc is transitive), and complete if R ∪ R−1 = X × X. We can now ask for a sufficient condition in any register that ensures that a non-trivial, semi-transitive relation with a transitive symmetric part is complete and transitive. Thus, rather than denoting R by 4, as is standard especially in the social sciences,1 this is to ask for any register that ensures, in the vernacular of set-theory, (P 6= ∅) ∧ ((I ◦ P ⊆ P ) ∧ (P ◦ I ⊆ P )) ∧ (I ◦ I ⊆ I) =⇒ (R ∪ R−1 = X ×X) ∧ (R ◦ R ⊆ R). In his remarkable paper, Eilenberg (1941) provided a partial answer this question by invok- ing a topological register and assuming a continuous binary (preference) relation on a connected (choice) set. His answer inaugurated the study of a partially ordered topological space, and his work received important substantive extension at the hands of Debreu (1954, 1964), Ward (1954a and 1954b), Sonnenschein (1965, 1967), McCartan (1966) and Schmeidler (1971). In the twin- registers of economic and decision theory, the extension involved a move to a setting of total pre-orders, which is to say from a setting of singleton indifference sets to a more general situation where the preference map of a consumer is delineated by indifference surfaces. Recent work in both mathematical economics and mathematical psychology has rediscov- ered these original papers, and under the label of the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein (ES) research pro- gram, has been particularly stimulated by what it sees as the derivation of behavioral conse- quences of merely technical topological assumptions; see, for example, Khan and Uyanık (2019), Giarlotta and Watson (2019) and their references. Eilenberg, and following him Ward, phrased their results only in the language of topological structures, but Herstein and Milnor (1953), with Wold (1943 -- 44) as their important precursor, focused on the functional representation of the relation, and shifted all topological assumptions on the choice set to that on the unit inter- val. This is to say, they focused their attention on the mixing operation, rather than on the objects of choice itself. Wold (1943 -- 44) used a similar scalar-continuity property in his work, but with an additional monotonicity assumption; also see Fishburn (1982), Wakker (1989), Bridges and Mehta (1995), Herden and Pallack (2001) and Candeal, Indur´ain and Molina (2012), Galaabaatar, Khan and Uyanık (2019) on numerical representation of preferences. In addition to this parametrized topological setting, we also mention for the record, a third setting, that involves no topology at all, but constrains itself to a purely algebraic structure. This goes back at least 1This notation is perhaps original to (Arrow, 1951, p. 11) who observed that he was representing "preference [relations] by a notation not customarily employed in economics, though familiar in mathematics and particularly in symbolic logic." 1 to seminal paper of Holder (1901); also see Fishburn (1972) and Luce (2000). In this paper we work with a richer order-theoretic structure defined by two binary rela- tions instead of one, a structure that is only now being appreciated and given prominence; see Giarlotta and Greco (2013), Giarlotta (2014), Giarlotta and Watson (2019) and Uyanık r(cid:13) Khan (2019a) and their references; also see Chipman (1971) and Maccheroni, Marinacci and Rustichini (2006) for an implicitly assumed bi-preference structure. In this richer structure, we introduce a parametric continuity concept for (bi-)relations that does not assume any structure on the choice set itself, and is weaker than the usual continuity properties that require it to have one of the topological or algebraic structures. We report two theorems, one of which provides a new charac- terization of topological connectedness, and show by examples that our results are non-vacuous. Even in the special case of a single binary relation, our first result provide a synthetic treatment of the antecedent ES literature by generalizing and unifying it, and in particular, our analytical treatment provides an alternative proof of the theorems of Eilenberg (1941), Sonnenschein (1965, 1967) and Rader (1963). 2 Notational and Conceptual Preliminaries We elaborate the terminology presented in Section 1 to the setting of a bi-relation. Definition 1. A bi-relation on a set X is a pair (RH, RS) of relations on X such that RH ⊆ RS and PS ⊆ PH. A bi-relation (RH, RS) is non-trivial if PS 6= ∅, and semi-transitive if (i) RH is semi-transitive, (ii) IS ◦ RH ⊆ RS and RH ◦ IS ⊆ RS, (iii) PH ∩ (PS ◦ IS) ⊆ PS and PH ∩ (IS ◦ PS) ⊆ PS. For any bi-relation (RH , RS), we informally refer to RH as its hard part, and RS as its soft part. We now present the basic continuity assumption that motivates this paper and is the subject of its investigation. Definition 2. A bi-relation (RH , RS) on a set X is p-continuous (parametrically continuous) if for all x, y ∈ X, there exist a topological space Λxy and a function fxy : Λxy → X with x, y ∈ fxy(Λxy) such that for all z ∈ X, (i) f −1 (ii) f −1 xy (RH(z)) and f −1 xy (PS(z)) and f −1 xy (R−1 xy (P −1 H (z)) are closed, and S (z)) are open. We call a p-continuous bi-relation connected if each space Λxy in Definition 2 is connected. The concept is admittedly abstract, but one can get a feel for it by dissociating the two aspects of Herstein and Milnor (1953) that it generalizes: first, keeping the unit interval, and focusing on the fact that rather than a linear function, any function is being considered; and second, replacing the unit interval by any topological space, both operations localized by the dependence on the pair (Λxy, fxy) on the two chosen points, x and y. We now recall for the reader the standard 2 Definition 3. A topological space X is connected if it is not the union of two non-empty, disjoint open sets. A subset of X is connected if it is connected as a subspace. A relation R on a set X is p-continuous if the bi-relation (R, R) is p-continuous, and it is connected if the bi-relation (R, R) is connected. The reader may wish to contrast this definition to Fishburn (1972, p. 27). Moreover, Definition 4. A relation on a topological space is continuous if it has closed sections and its asymmetric part has open sections. 3 The Results and their Proofs We can now present our first result, Theorem 1. The soft part of every non-trivial, semi-transitive and connected bi-relation is com- plete and transitive. Next, we present a special case of Theorem 1 for a binary relation. Note that a relation R on a set X is non-trivial, semi-transitive, connected and has a transitive symmetric part if and only if the bi-relation (R, R) on X is non-trivial, semi-transitivity and connected. On setting RH = RS in a bi-relation (RH, RS), we obtain the following as a corollary of Theorem 1. Corollary 1. Every non-trivial, semi-transitive and connected binary relation whose symmetric part is transitive, is complete and transitive. In the light of the above discussion, we can now present Theorem (Eilenberg 1941). Every anti-symmetric, complete and continuous relation on a connected set is transitive. Theorem 1 provides a generalization and alternative proof not only of Eilenberg (1941, 2.1), but also of the extensions pursued in Rader (1963) and Sonnenschein (1965). Without any attempt to downplay the importance of the exercise, we invite the reader to show that the principal results in the literature follow as a consequence of Theorem 1 and Corollary 1 above, and Lemma 1 and Propositions 1 -- 2 below: Rader (1963, Lemma), Sonnenschein (1965, Theo- rem 3), Schmeidler (1971, Theorem), Dubra (2011, Theorem 1), Karni and Safra (2015, The- orem 1), McCarthy and Mikkola (2018, Theorem 1), Khan and Uyanık (2019, Proposition 1); Giarlotta and Watson (2019, Theorem 5.2) and finally Uyanık r(cid:13) Khan (2019b, Theorems 1 and 2). In our judgment, this exercise testifies to the importance of the results presented here. (Note, however, that the authors of the above papers present their results in an extended form that also involve consideration not germane to those pursued here; our generalization concerns only the relevant part of their results.) In the sequel, we also illustrate the novelty of our proof-techniques by contrasting them with earlier proofs. We now turn to the proofs, and begin by recalling the following. Lemma 1. For any binary relation R on a set X the following is true: 3 (a) if R is complete and semi-transitive, then I is transitive; (b) if P is negatively transitive, then it is transitive and R is semi-transitive; (c) R is transitive if and only if it is semi-transitive and P, I are transitive. For a proof, see Sen (1969, Theorem I) and Khan and Uyanık (2019, Proposition 2) on Sen's deconstruction of the transitivity postulate. We shall also need the following two claims concerning a non-trivial, semi-transitive and connected bi-relation (RH, RS) on an arbitrary set X. Claim 1. If (y, x) ∈ PS, then PS(y) ∪ P −1 Claim 2. RS ∪ R−1 S (x) = X. S = X × X. The proof of Theorem 1 follows as a direct consequence of these preliminary results Proof of Theorem 1. Claim 2 already establishes the completeness of the soft part of the bi- relation. Now negative transitivity of PS is equivalent to Claim 1. Then (b) of Lemma 1 implies RS is semi-transitive and PS is transitive. It follows from Claim 2, semi-transitivity of RS and (a) of Lemma 1 that IS is transitive. Then (c) of Lemma 1 implies RS is transitive. All that remains now are the proofs of the two claims. Proof of Claim 1. Pick (y, x) ∈ PS. Then (y, x) ∈ PH. It follows from semi-transitivity of the bi-relation that RH(y) ∪ R−1 H (x) = PS(y) ∪ P −1 S (x). (1) H (x). Then either z ∈ IH(x) or z ∈ P −1 One direction of the inclusion relationship immediately follows from the definition of bi-relation. In order to prove the other direction pick z ∈ R−1 H (x). Assume z ∈ IH(x). It follows from the definition of bi-relation that z ∈ IS(x). Moreover, x ∈ PH(y), z ∈ IH(x) and semi-transitivity of RH imply (y, z) ∈ PH. Note that z ∈ IS(x) and x ∈ PS(y) imply (y, z) ∈ IS ◦ PS. Then semi-transitivity of the bi-relation implies z ∈ PS(y). Now assume z ∈ P −1 H (x). Then the definition of bi-relation implies that either x ∈ PS(z) or x ∈ IS(z). If x ∈ PS(z), then there is nothing to prove. Now assume x ∈ IS(z). Then semi-transitivity of the bi-relation, z ∈ IS(x) and x ∈ PH(y) imply that z ∈ RS(y). Hence either z ∈ PS(y) or z ∈ IS(y). If z ∈ IS(y), then semi-transitivity of the bi-relation, x ∈ PS(y), y ∈ IS(z) and x ∈ PH(z) imply that x ∈ PS(z). This contradicts x ∈ IS(z). Hence, z ∈ PS(y) must hold. The proof for z ∈ RH (y) is analogous. We next prove that PS(y) ∪ P −1 S (x) = X. To this end pick z ∈ X. It follows from the connectedness of the bi-relation that there exist a connected topological space Λyz and a function fyz : Λyz → X satisfying the conditions in Definition 2. It follows from Equation 1 above that yz (R−1 H (x)) = f −1 f −1 yz (RH (y)) ∪ f −1 (2) It follows from x ∈ PS(y) and y = fyz(λ) for some λ ∈ Λyz that λ ∈ f −1 S (x)). Hence the set in Equation 2 is non-empty. It follows from p-continuity that it is both closed and open in Λyz. Therefore, as a nonempty, closed and open subset of a connected set Λyz, the set f −1 yz (PS(y)) ∪ f −1 S (x)) is equal to Λyz. Then it follows from z = fyz(δ) for some δ ∈ Λyz that yz (P −1 δ ∈ f −1 yz (P −1 yz (PS(y)) ∪ f −1 S (x)), hence z ∈ PS(y) or z ∈ P −1 yz PS(y) ∪ f −1 yz (P −1 S (x). S (x)). yz (P −1 4 Proof of Claim 2. Assume there exists u, v ∈ X such that (u, v) /∈ RS ∪ R−1 S . Note that non- triviality of RS implies that (¯y, ¯x) ∈ PS for some ¯x, ¯y ∈ X. Since PS is negatively transitive, then u ∈ P −1 S (¯x). Then negative transitivity of PS implies that v ∈ P −1 S (¯x). Hence ¯x ∈ PS(u) ∩ PS(v). The semi-transitivity of the bi-relation implies that S (¯x) or u ∈ PS(¯y). Assume u ∈ P −1 S (¯x) or v ∈ PS(u). Since u, v /∈ RS ∪ R−1 S , therefore v ∈ P −1 IH(u) ∩ RH(v) = ∅ = RH (u) ∩ IH(v). (3) In order to prove the first equality, assume there exists z ∈ IH(u) ∩ RH(v). If z ∈ PH(v), then semi-transitivity of RH implies that u ∈ PH(v), hence u ∈ RS(v). This yields a contradiction. Then assume z ∈ IH (v). The definition of bi-relation implies that z ∈ IS(v). Then it follows from semi-transitivity of bi-relation that (u, v) ∈ RS. This yields a contradiction. The proof of the second equality is analogous. Therefore, Equation 3 and the definition of the bi-relation imply that (4) It follows from the connectedness of the bi-relation that there exist a connected topological space Λ¯xu and a function f¯xu : Λ¯xu → X satisfying the conditions in Definition 2. It follows from Equation 4 above that RH(u) ∩ RH (v) = PS(u) ∩ PS(v). f −1 ¯xu (RH(u)) ∩ f −1 ¯xu (RH (v)) = f −1 ¯xu (PS(u)) ∩ f −1 (5) It follows from ¯x ∈ PS(u) ∩ PS(v) and ¯x = f¯xu(λ) for some λ ∈ Λ¯xu that λ ∈ f −1 ¯xu (PS(u)) ∩ f −1 ¯xu (PS(v)). Analogously it follows from u /∈ PS(u) and u = f¯xu(δ) for some δ ∈ Λ¯xu that δ /∈ f −1 ¯xu (PS(v)). Hence the set if Equation 2 is non-empty and proper subset of Λyz. It follows from p-continuity that it is both closed and open in Λyz. This contradicts with the connectedness of Λ¯xu. ¯xu (PS(u)) ∩ f −1 ¯xu (PS(v)). The proof is analogous for u ∈ PS(¯y). Therefore RS is complete. We now turn to the second main result of this paper. Note that the essential point of Theorem 1 is that its conclusion of completeness and transitivity of the soft relation do not call for any mathematical structure on the (choice) set on which the (preference) bi-relation is defined: a local topological structure on the local parameter space suffices enough to obtain. We now work towards a converse question first posed in the context of a single binary relation in Khan and Uyanık (2019). Our second theorem shows that topological connectedness is both necessary and sufficient for completeness and transitivity of a bi-relation. Towards this end, for any topology τ on X, let R(X, τ ), denote the set of all non-trivial and semi-transitive bi-relations (RH, RS) on X such that τ (RH , RS) ⊆ τ , where τ (RH, RS) denotes the coarsest topology on X containing all sections of PS and the complements of the sections of RH . We can then present Theorem 2. For any set X and topology τ on it the following is equivalent: (a) the space (X, τ ) is connected; (b) if (R, R) ∈ R(X, τ ), then R is complete and transitive; (c) if (RH , RS) ∈ R(X, τ ), then RS is complete and transitive. Proof. The implication (a) ⇒ (c) follows from Theorem 1 above and Proposition 1 below, (c) ⇒ (b) from setting RH = RS and (b) ⇒ (a) from Khan and Uyanık (2019, Theorem 2). 5 We note that in a parallel but different path, McCartan (1966) provides a characterization of compactness and Hausdorff separation axiom by using the preferences defined on a choice set. We have already observed above that the richer bi-preference structure that we work with enables different techniques of proof. We elaborate this observation here, beginning with Eilen- berg's method. As a preliminary remark, note that although Eilenberg assumes the relation to be complete, what follows shows that his method-of-proof extends to a situation where this is not so. Given his assumption on R being an anti-symmetric and continuous relation on a connected set X, R ∩ R−1 ⊆ ∆. The method requires one to pick x, y, z ∈ X such that (z, y), (y, x) ∈ P . The connectedness of X and the continuity of R imply that R(y) is connected and contains y. Note first that if y /∈ R(y), then x ∈ R(y), z /∈ R(y) and continuity of R imply that R(y) is a closed, open, non-empty and a proper subset of X, which contradicts the connectedness of the space. Now assume R(y) is disconnected. Then there exists non-empty, disjoint and closed subsets A, B of the subspace R(y) such that A ∪ B = R(y). Let y ∈ B. Note that X = A ∪ (B ∪ R−1(y) ∪ (R(y) ∪ R−1(y))c ∪ {y}) = A ∪ (B ∪ R−1(y) ∪ (P (y) ∪ P −1(y))c), where A and the set in paranthesis are non-empty, disjoint and closed. This contradicts the connectedness of X. Finally, note that R(y) = P (z) ∪ P −1(z) ∪ (R ∪ R−1)c(z), and recall that x, y ∈ R(y) and y ∈ P (z). If x /∈ P (z), then this furnishes us a contradiction to the connectedness of R(y). Therefore, (z, x) ∈ P . Since R is anti-symmetric, it is transitive. The proof is complete. Now consider the special case of the method we pursue in Theorem 1 which begins with an anti-symmetric and continuous relation R on a connected set X, and picks x, y ∈ X such that (y, x) ∈ P . Then the anti-symmetry of R implies that R(y) ∪ R−1(x) = P (y) ∪ P −1(x). Therefore it follows from the continuity of R and connectedness of X that P (y) ∪ P −1(x) = X. Hence P is negatively transitive, which implies P is transitive. In order to see this, pick (y, z), (z, x) ∈ P . Negative transitivity of P implies that (y, x) ∈ P or (z, y) ∈ P . Therefore (y, x) ∈ P , hence P is transitive. Since R is anti-symmetric, it is transitive. Therefore the proof is complete. Finally, we leave it to the reader to check that our method of proof has some similarities with the argument pursued by Schmeidler (1971), but there are also some subtle differences. In any case, is not the intricacy of the proofs but the surprise of the conclusion that is the point of all this work. We conclude this section by listing possible future directions of research. Note that p- continuity does not require fxy to be mixture-linear, and more importantly, for all x, y the function is allowed to be chosen differently. This has relevance to Diewert, Avriel and Zang (1981) which studies different forms of convexity assumptions on functions, and merits investigation. It will also be interesting to extend the results in this paper to k-connected spaces and component-wise non-trivial relations on an arbitrary topological spaces; see for example Khan and Uyanık (2019). Furthermore, given our tilt to the subject, generalizing Lorimer's (1967) set-theoretic version of Eilenberg and Sonnenschein's result is of interest. Finally, it will be interesting to explore how our results generalize to n-ary relations, given their importance in the literature of analytical philosophy; see Anand (1993); Temkin (1996, 2015) and their references. 6 4 Some Additional Considerations In this section, we turn to the usual scalar and section continuity properties of a relation, and show that they are stronger than p-continuity, once relevant mathematical structures on the choice set are in place; see Uyanık r(cid:13) Khan (2019a) for a detailed discussion of the relationship between different continuity assumptions on preferences, and Ciesielski and Miller (2016) for those on functions. Proposition 1. Every continuous relation on a topological space is p-continuous. Proof. Let R be a continuous relation on a topological space X. For all x, y ∈ X, setting Λxy = X and fxy(a) = a for all a ∈ Λxy finishes the proof. Finally, note that if X is connected, then the bi-relation is connected. For scalar continuity concepts, we say that a set S is a mixture set if for any x, y ∈ S and for any µ ∈ [0, 1] we can associate another element, xµy, that is in S, and where for all λ, µ ∈ [0, 1], (S1) x1y = x, (S1)xµy = y(1 − µ)x, and (S3)(xµy)λy = x(λµ)y. Definition 5. We refer a relation R on a mixture set S to be (i) mixture-continuous if for all x, y, z ∈ S, the sets {λ ∈ [0, 1] xλy ∈ R(z)} and {λ ∈ [0, 1] xλy ∈ R−1(z)} are closed, (ii) Archimedean if for all x, y, z ∈ S with (y, x) ∈ P , there exists λ, δ ∈ (0, 1) such that xλz ∈ P (y) and yδz ∈ P −1(x). Moreover, R is scalarly continuous if it is mixture-continuous and Archimedean. Proposition 2. Every scalarly continuous relation on a mixture set is connected, hence p- continuous. Proof. Let R be a scalarly continuous relation on a mixture set X and Λxy = [0, 1] for all x, y ∈ X. Then, for all x, y ∈ X, fxy(λ) = xλy for all λ ∈ Λxy. It is easy to observe that the closedness of the sets f −1 xy (R−1(z)) is equivalent to mixture-continuity property. Under the mixture continuity assumption, it follows from Galaabaatar, Khan and Uyanık (2019, Proposition 1) that Archimedean property is equivalent to the property that f −1 xy (R(z)) and f −1 xy (P (z)) and f −1 xy (P −1(z)) are open. The following two definitions extends the usual continuity assumptions on uni-relations to bi-relations. Definition 6. A bi-relation (RH, RS) on a topological space is continuous if RH has closed sections and PS has open sections. S (z)} are open. Definition 7. A bi-relation (RH , RS) on a mixture set S is scalarly continuous if RH is mixture continuous and for all x, y, z ∈ S, the sets {λ ∈ [0, 1] xλy ∈ PS(z)} and {λ ∈ [0, 1] xλy ∈ P −1 The second part of scalar continuity is a property slightly stronger than RS being Archimedean. The Archimedean property and part (ii) of Definition 7 are equivalent if RS is mixture-continuous; see Galaabaatar, Khan and Uyanık (2019, Proposition 1) for details. We leave it to the reader to obtain the versions of the two propositions above for bi-relations. 7 5 Some Concluding Examples We conclude the paper with three examples. The first is a modified version of a famous example due to Genocchi and Peano (1884), and illustrates a preference relation that is p-continuous but not continuous, thus ensuring that the two theorems reported in this paper are non-vacuous. The second example concerns the canonical order in Rn; it satisfies all of the assumptions of Theorem 1 except the openness requirements of the sections. The third example is a simple modification of the second that is phrased in terms of a relation that is both incomplete and non-transitive. Example 1. Let X = [0, 1]2 and f : X → R defined as f (x) = 2x1x2 1 + x2 x2 2 if x 6= (0, 0) and f (0, 0) = (1, 1). Note that f is not continuous in each variable, and hence not (jointly) continuous. Induce a relation R on X such that (x, y) ∈ R if f (x) ≤ f (y). It is clear that R is complete and transitive. However, R is not mixture-continuous, hence not continuous. In order to see this, let x = (0, 0) and y = (1, 0). Then the set {λ ∈ [0, 1]λx+(1−λ)y ∈ R−1(y)} = (0, 1] is not open in X. It is not difficult to show that R is p-continuous; simply for x, y above, set Λxy = [0, 1] and fxy(λ) = (λ, λ) for λ < 0.5 and fxy(λ) = (λ, 1 − λ) for λ ≥ 0.5. Example 2. Let X = Rn + and R be the usual relation ≥ on X defined as "x ≥ y if xi ≥ yi for all i." The asymmetric part P of R is the relation > defined as "x > y if xi ≥ yi for all i and xj > yj for some j." It is clear that X is connected, R is anti-symmetric, transitive, non-trivial and has closed sections. However the section of P are not open since P (x) = R(x)\{x} and P −1(x) = R−1(x)\{x}. Clearly, R is incomplete. Example 3. Let X = [0, 1] and R = {(x, y)x ≤ 0.5, x ≤ y ≤ 0.5} ∪ {(x, y)x ≥ 0.5, y ≥ x}. It is clear that R is reflexive and anti-symmetric, hence R is semi-transitive and has a transitive indifference. Note that R−1(0.5) = [0, 0.5] and R(0.5) = [0.5, 1]. Since [0, 0.5] × [0.5, 1] * R implies R is not transitive. It is clear that R is not complete. Since R has closed graph, it has closed sections. However, P does not have open sections. For example P (0.25) = (0.25, 0.5] and P −1(0.75) = [0.5, 0.75) which are not open in [0,1]. References Anand, Paul (1993) "The philosophy of intransitive preference," The Economic Journal, Vol. 103, No. 417, pp. 337 -- 346. Arrow, Kenneth J (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values: New York: Wiley. Bridges, Douglas S and Ghanshyam B Mehta (1995) Representations of Preference Orderings: Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Candeal, Juan C, Esteban Indur´ain, and Jos´e A Molina (2012) "Numerical representability of ordered topological spaces with compatible algebraic structure," Order, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 131 -- 146. 8 Chipman, J.S. (1971) "Consumption theory without transitive indiference," in Chipman, J.S., L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter, and H. Sonenschein eds. Preferences, Utility and Demand: A Min- nesota Symposium, pp. 224 -- 253: New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Ciesielski, Krzysztof Chris and David Miller (2016) "A continuous tale on continuous and sepa- rately continuous functions," Real Analysis Exchange, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 19 -- 54. Debreu, Gerard (1954) "Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function," in Thrall, M., R.C. Davis, and C.H. Coombs eds. Decision Processes, Chap. XI, pp. 159 -- 165: New York: Wiley. (1964) "Continuity properties of Paretian utility," International Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 285 -- 293. Diewert, W Erwin, Mordecai Avriel, and Israel Zang (1981) "Nine kinds of quasiconcavity and concavity," Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 397 -- 420. Dubra, Juan (2011) "Continuity and completeness under risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 80 -- 81. Eilenberg, Samuel (1941) "Ordered topological spaces," American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 39 -- 45. Fishburn, P.C. (1972) Mathematics of Decision Theory: The Hauge: Mouton. Fishburn, Peter C (1982) The Foundations of Expected Utility: Boston: D. Riedel Publishing Company. Galaabaatar, Tsogbadral, M. Ali Khan, and Metin Uyanık (2019) "Completeness and transitivity of preferences on mixture sets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 99, pp. 49 -- 62. Genocchi, A and G Peano (1884) Calcolo Differentiale e Principii di Calcolo: Torino: Fratelli Bocca. Giarlotta, Alfio (2014) "A genesis of interval orders and semiorders: transitive NaP-preferences," Order, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 239 -- 258. Giarlotta, Alfio and Salvatore Greco (2013) "Necessary and possible preference structures," Jour- nal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 163 -- 172. Giarlotta, Alfio and Stephen Watson (2019) "A bi-preference interplay between transitivity and completeness: Reformulating and extending Schmeidler's theorem," Journal of Mathematical Psychology (forthcoming). Herden, Gerhard and Andreas Pallack (2001) "Interrelations between the length, the structure and the cardinality of a chain," Order, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 191 -- 200. Herstein, Israel N and John Milnor (1953) "An axiomatic approach to measurable utility," Econo- metrica, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 291 -- 297. Karni, Edi and Zvi Safra (2015) "Continuity, completeness, betweenness and cone-monotonicity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 74, pp. 68 -- 72. Khan, M. Ali and Metin Uyanık (2019) "Topological connectedness and behavioral assumptions 9 on preferences: a two-way relationship," Economic Theory, (forthcoming) doi: 10.1007/s00199- 019-01206-7. Lorimer, Peter (1967) "A note on orderings," Econometrica, Vol. 35, No. 3 -- 4, pp. 537 -- 539. Luce, Duncan (2000) Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches: New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. Maccheroni, Fabio, Massimo Marinacci, and Aldo Rustichini (2006) "Ambiguity aversion, ro- bustness, and the variational representation of preferences," Econometrica, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 1447 -- 1498. McCartan, SD (1966) "On subsets of a partially ordered set," Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 583 -- 595. McCarthy, David and Kalle Mikkola (2018) "Continuity and completeness of strongly independent preorders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 93, pp. 141 -- 145. Rader, Trout (1963) "The existence of a utility function to represent preferences," The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 229 -- 232. Schmeidler, David (1971) "A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations," Econometrica, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 403 -- 404. Sen, Amartya (1969) "Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions," The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 381 -- 393. Sonnenschein, Hugo (1965) "The relationship between transitive preference and the structure of the choice space," Econometrica, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 624 -- 634. (1967) "Reply to "a note on orderings"," Econometrica, Vol. 35, No. 3 -- 4, p. 540. Temkin, Larry S. (1996) "A continuum argument for intransitivity," Philosophy and Public Affi- ars, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 175 -- 2010. (2015) Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning: Oxford: Oxford University Press. Uyanık, Metin r(cid:13) M. Ali Khan (2019a) "The continuity postulate in economic theory: a decon- struction and an integration," Working Paper. (2019b) "On the consistency and the decisiveness of the double-minded decision-maker," Economics Letters, Vol. 185, p. 108657. Wakker, Peter P (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis: Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ward, LE (1954a) "Binary relations in topological spaces," Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Vol. 26, pp. 357 -- 373. (1954b) "Partially ordered topological spaces," Proceedings of the American Mathemat- ical Society, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 144 -- 161. Wold, Herman (1943 -- 44) "A synthesis of pure demand analysis, I -- III," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 85 -- 118, 220 -- 263; 27, 69 -- 120. 10
1808.03129	2	1808	2018-09-23T11:26:37	Existence of Equilibrium Prices: A Pedagogical Proof	[ "econ.TH" ]	Under the same assumptions made by Mas-Colell et al. (1995), I develop a short, simple, and complete proof of existence of equilibrium prices based on excess demand functions. The result is obtained by applying the Brouwer fixed point theorem to a trimmed simplex which does not contain prices equal to zero. The mathematical techniques are based on some results obtained in Neuefeind (1980) and Geanakoplos (2003).	econ.TH	econ	Existence of Equilibrium Prices: A Pedagogical Proof∗ Simone Tonin† September 25, 2018 Abstract Under the same assumptions made by Mas-Colell et al. (1995), I develop a short, sim- ple, and complete proof of existence of equilibrium prices based on excess demand func- tions. The result is obtained by applying the Brouwer fixed point theorem to a trimmed simplex which does not contain prices equal to zero. The mathematical techniques are based on some results obtained in Neuefeind (1980) and Geanakoplos (2003). 1 Introduction This paper aims to provide a short, simple, and complete proof of existence of equilibrium prices under the same set of assumptions made in Mas-Colell et al. (1995). The existence result is derived by two lemmas which define, respectively, the non-empty compact convex set and the continuous function required by the Brouwer fixed point theorem. As usual, it is shown that the fixed point is an equilibrium price vector. It would be pretentious to say that the proof is new as it follows closely some results of Neuefeind (1980) and Geanakoplos (2003). However, the approach developed here highlights clearly the central role of fixed point theorems in proving the existence of equilibrium prices. This can be interesting from a pedagogical and historical point of view as the two results are strongly linked. I further discuss this point in the last section. Let me briefly outline the results of Neuefeind (1980) and Geanakoplos (2003). Neuefeind (1980) showed that, under a proper boundary behaviour of the excess demand function, it is possible to consider a trimmed simplex which does not contain prices equal to zero. In the first lemma I prove the same result by considering a different boundary condition. Geanakoplos (2003) added a perturbation in a correspondence considered by Debreu (1959) to make it single-valued and to apply the Brouwer fixed point theorem. The second lemma states this key result and I report its proof for completeness. Furthermore, by using the result of Neuefeind (1980), the boundary condition of the excess demand function is used in a different way from Geanakoplos (2003) (for a detailed analysis of the boundary condition see Ruscitti, 2012). 2 Mathematical model Consider an exchange economy with L commodities, l = 1, . . . , L. Let z : RL ++ → RL be the exchange economy's excess demand function defined over the set of positive price vectors. I make the same assumptions used in Proposition 17.C.1 of Mas-Colell et al. (1995): (A1) z(·) is continuous; (A2) z(·) is homogeneous of degree zero; ∗I would like to thank Giulio Codognato and Marialaura Pesce for their helpful suggestions. †Durham University Business School, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LB, UK 1 (A3) p · z(p) = 0 for all p ∈ RL ++ (Walras' law); (A4) There is an s > 0 such that zl(p) > −s for all l and for all p ∈ RL ++. (A5) If pn → p, where p 6= 0 and pl = 0 for some l,1 then max{z1(pn), . . . , zL(pn)} → +∞. Exchange economies with a positive aggregate endowment of each commodity and with con- sumers having continuous, strongly monotone, and strictly convex preferences satisfy Assump- tions A1-A5 (see Proposition 17.B.2 in Mas-Colell et al., 1995). Let ∆ = {p ∈ RL + : Pl pl = 1} be the unit simplex. Since the excess demand function is homogeneous of degree zero, its domain can be restricted to the interior of the unit simplex int∆. However, this is an open set and to apply the fixed point theorem it is required a closed set which contains only positive prices. For this reason, I define a trimmed simplex ∆ǫ = {p ∈ ∆ : pl ≥ ǫ, for all l}, with ǫ ∈ (0, 1 L ]. In the paper it is always assumed that ǫ lies in (0, 1 L ), at which all prices are equal, and the following straightforward result. L ]. Finally, in the proof I will repeatedly use the price vector ¯q = ( 1 L , . . . , 1 Proposition. The sets ∆ and ∆ǫ are non-empty, compact, and convex. I finally state the theorem of existence of equilibrium prices. Theorem. Under Assumptions A1-A5, there exists a p∗ ∈ RL ++ such that z(p∗) = 0. It is immediate to see that z(p) = 0 corresponds to the system of L equations in L unknowns introduced by Walras (1874-7) and the solution p∗ is the equilibrium price vector at which all markets clear. 3 Proof The first step consists in defining the non-empty, compact, and convex set required by the fixed point theorem. To this end, the result of the next lemma implies that if an equilibrium price vector p∗ exists, then there is an ǫ such that p∗ belongs to the interior of the set ∆ǫ. Lemma 1. Let Q = {p ∈ int∆ : Pl zl(p) ≤ 0}. Under Assumptions A1-A5, there exists an ǫ ∈ (0, 1 L ] such that Q ⊆ int∆ǫ. Proof. First, the set Q is non-empty as the price vector ¯q belongs to Q by Walras' law, i.e., 1 L Pl zl(¯q) = 0. Next, I show, by contradiction, that there exists an ǫ ∈ (0, 1 L ] such that Q ⊆ int∆ǫ. Suppose that for all ǫ ∈ (0, 1 L ] there exists a price vector p ∈ Q such that p /∈ int∆ǫ. Consider a sequence of {ǫn} with ǫn = 1 nL . Then, there exists a sequence of price vectors {pn} such that pn ∈ Q and pn /∈ int∆ǫn for all n. Since the sequence {pn} belongs to the compact set ∆, there is a subsequence pkn → p with p ∈ ∆. As pkn /∈ int∆ǫkn for all n, it follows that, for all n, pkn l ≤ ǫkn for some l. Then, I can conclude that pl = 0 for some l because ǫkn → 0. Hence, max{z1(pkn ), . . . , zL(pkn )} → ∞ by A5. Moreover, since z(·) has a lower bound by A4, the inequality max{z1(pkn ), . . . , zL(pkn )} − s(L − 1) < Pl zl(pkn ) holds for all n. As the left hand side converges to infinity by the previous result, there exists an m such that max{z1(pkn ), . . . , zL(pkn )} − s(L − 1) > 0 for all n > m. But then, it follows that Pl zl(pkn ) > 0 for all n > m. As pkn ∈ Q for all n, it also follows that P zl(pkn ) ≤ 0 for all n, a contradiction. Therefore, there exists an ǫ ∈ (0, 1 L ] such that Q ⊆ int∆ǫ. The next step consists in defining the continuous function on ∆ǫ to itself required by the Brouwer fixed point theorem. A possible approach would be to consider the correspondence 1The symbol 0 denotes the origin in RL as well as the real number zero. µ(p) = arg max {q · z(p)}, q∈∆ǫ 2 which may be multivalued, and apply the Kakutani fixed point theorem. As noted in Debreu (1959), the use of this correspondence is motivated by the idea that if there is excess demand (supply) in a market the price should increase (decrease). Differently, I follow the approach of Geanakoplos (2003) who introduce a perturbation, −kq − pk2, to make the correspondence above single-valued.2 The next lemma deals with the continuous function φ(·) on which I will apply the Brouwer fixed point theorem. Lemma 2. Let φ : ∆ǫ → ∆ǫ be such that φ(p) = arg max q∈∆ǫ (cid:8)q · z(p) − kq − pk2(cid:9) . Under Assumptions A1-A5, φ(·) is a continuous function. Proof. Define the function g(q, p) = q · z(p) − kq − pk2. Since I consider only prices belonging to ∆ǫ, g(·, ·) is continuous as it is a sum of continuous function. Let p be a constant. Then, g(·, p) has a maximum point on the non-empty compact set ∆ǫ by the Weierstrass Theorem. It is immediate to verify that the square of the Euclidean distance is strictly convex. In fact, its Hessian matrix is a diagonal matrix with positive entries and it is then positive definite. Then, g(·, p) is strictly concave because it is a sum of a linear function and a strictly concave function. But then, the maximum is unique and φ(·) is a function. Finally, I prove that φ(·) is continuous. Let q∗ = φ(p) be the unique maximum point of g(·, p). Since ∆ǫ is compact, I can consider a sequence pn → p and a corresponding subsequence {pkn } such that φ(pkn ) → r with r ∈ ∆ǫ. By the definition of φ(·), the following inequality holds g(q∗, pkn ) ≤ g(φ(pkn ), pkn ). As the function g(·, ·) is continuous, it follows that g(q∗, pkn ) → g(q∗, p) and g(φ(pkn ), pkn ) → g(r, p). Then, g(q∗, p) ≤ g(r, p) by the properties of sequences. Since the maximum point is unique, it follows that r = q∗. But then, if the subsequence pkn → p, it follows that φ(pkn ) → q∗ = φ(p). Hence, φ(·) is continuous. I finally prove the existence theorem Proof. By the results in Lemmas 1 and 2, I can apply the Brouwer fixed point theorem and then there exists a fixed point p∗ of the function φ(·), i.e., p∗ = φ(p∗). Next, I show that p∗ ∈ int∆ǫ. Since p∗ is the unique maximum point of g(·, p∗) on ∆ǫ and g(p∗, p∗) = 0 by Walras' law, it follows that g(αp + (1 − α)p∗, p∗) = (αp + (1 − α)p∗) · z(p∗) − k(αp + (1 − α)p∗) − p∗k2 < 0, for each α ∈ (0, 1] and p ∈ ∆ǫ with p 6= p∗. By applying the Walras Law the previous inequality simplifies in p · z(p∗) < αkp − p∗k2, for each α ∈ (0, 1]. Suppose now that there exists a p ∈ ∆ǫ such that p · z(p∗) > 0. Then, there exists a sufficiently small ¯α ∈ (0, 1] such that p · z(p∗) > ¯αkp − p∗k2, a contradiction. Hence, p · z(p∗) ≤ 0 for all p ∈ ∆ǫ. Since ¯q ∈ ∆ǫ, it follows that ¯q · z(p∗) = 1 L Pl zl(p∗) ≤ 0 which implies that p∗ ∈ Q. But then, p∗ ∈ int∆ǫ by Lemma 1. Furthermore, note that p∗ maximises p · z(p∗) on ∆ǫ because p∗ · z(p∗) = 0, by Walras' law, and p · z(p∗) ≤ 0 for all p ∈ ∆ǫ, by the previous result. Finally, I show that the fixed point p∗ is an equilibrium price vector, i.e., z(p∗) = 0. I proceed by contradiction and I suppose that there exists a commodity l such that zl(p∗) < 0. As p∗ maximises p · z(p∗) on ∆ǫ, it follows that p∗ l = ǫ. But p∗ ∈ int∆ǫ, a contradiction. Hence, zl(p∗) ≥ 0 for all l. By the fact that Pl zl(p∗) ≤ 0, I can conclude that z(p∗) = 0. 2The symbol kx − yk denotes the Euclidean distance between the vectors x and y. 3 4 Fixed point theorems and equilibrium prices In the literature there are alternative approaches to prove the existence of equilibrium prices which do not rely on fixed point theorems (see Greenberg (1977) and Quah (2008) among others). However they require stronger assumptions such as the weak gross substitutability or the weak axiom of revealed preference. This is due to the fact there is an equivalence between fixed point theorems and the existence of equilibrium prices under the classical assumptions as shown by Uzawa (1962). Debreu (1982) also pointed out that the proof of existence of equilibrium prices, under the classical assumptions, requires mathematical tools of the same power as fixed point theorems. As the Brouwer fixed point theorem was published in 1911, it is not surprising that the problem of existence of equilibrium prices formulated by Walras (1874-7) was solved in a general way by McKenzie (1954) and Arrow and Debreu (1954) for the first time. Under more restrictive assumptions some rigorous existence results were also obtained by A. Wald and J. von Neumann in the 1930s (for modern explanation of Wald's result see John, 1999). It is also worth mentioning that A. Wald wrote another paper on the existence problem in 1935 which unfortunately went lost. Duppe and Weintraub (2016) gave a detailed history of this lost proof and clarified that it applied a fixed-point theorem to show the existence of equilibrium prices in exchange economies. References [1] Arrow KJ and Debreu G (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econo- metrica 22, 265-290. [2] Debreu G (1959). Theory of value. Wiley. [3] Debreu G (1982). Existence of competitive equilibrium. In: Arrow KJ, Intriligator HD (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics. Elsevier. [4] Duppe T, Weintraub ER (2016). Losing Equilibrium: On the Existence of Abraham Walds Fixed- Point Proof of 1935. History of Political Economy 48, 635-655. [5] Geanakoplos J (2003). Nash and Walras equilibrium via Brouwer. Economic Theory 21, 585-603. [6] Greenberg J (1977). An elementary proof of the existence of a competitive equilibrium with weak gross substitutes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 513-516. [7] John R (1999). Abraham Wald's equilibrium existence proof reconsidered. Economic Theory 13, 417-428. [8] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. [9] McKenzie LW (1954). On equilibrium in Graham's model of world trade and other competitive systems. Econometrica 22, 147-161. [10] Neuefeind W (1980). Notes on existence of equilibrium proofs and the boundary behavior of supply. Econometrica 48, 1831-1837. [11] Ruscitti F (2012). On the boundary behavior of the excess demand function. Research in Eco- nomics 66, 371-374. [12] Quah JKH (2008). The existence of equilibrium when excess demand obeys the weak axiom. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44, 337-343. [13] Uzawa H (1962). Walras' existence theorem and Brouwer's fixed point theorem. Economic Studies Quarterly 8, 59-62. [14] Walras L (1874-7). Elements d'economie politique pure. Lausanne: Corbaz. 4
1808.03070	1	1808	2018-08-09T09:41:12	Network-based Referral Mechanism in a Crowdfunding-based Marketing Pattern	[ "econ.TH", "math.OC" ]	Crowdfunding is gradually becoming a modern marketing pattern. By noting that the success of crowdfunding depends on network externalities, our research aims to utilize them to provide an applicable referral mechanism in a crowdfunding-based marketing pattern. In the context of network externalities, measuring the value of leading customers is chosen as the key to coping with the research problem by considering that leading customers take a critical stance in forming a referral network. Accordingly, two sequential-move game models (i.e., basic model and extended model) were established to measure the value of leading customers, and a skill of matrix transformation was adopted to solve the model by transforming a complicated multi-sequence game into a simple simultaneous-move game. Based on the defined value of leading customers, a network-based referral mechanism was proposed by exploring exactly how many awards are allocated along the customer sequence to encourage the leading customers' actions of successful recommendation and by demonstrating two general rules of awarding the referrals in our model setting. Moreover, the proposed solution approach helps deepen an understanding of the effect of the leading position, which is meaningful for designing more numerous referral approaches.	econ.TH	econ	Network-based Referral Mechanism in a Crowdfunding-based Marketing Pattern Yongli LI 1, , Zhi-Ping FAN, and Wei ZHANG 1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, P.R. China 2. School of Public Policy and Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, P.R. China Abstract: Crowdfunding is gradually becoming a modern marketing pattern. By noting that the success of crowdfunding depends on network externalities, our research aims to utilize them to provide an applicable referral mechanism in a crowdfunding-based marketing pattern. In the context of network externalities, measuring the value of leading customers is chosen as the key to coping with the research problem by considering that leading customers take a critical stance in forming a referral network. Accordingly, two sequential-move game models (i.e., basic model and extended model) were established to measure the value of leading customers, and a skill of matrix transformation was adopted to solve the model by transforming a complicated multi-sequence game into a simple simultaneous-move game. Based on the defined value of leading customers, a network-based referral mechanism was proposed by exploring exactly how many awards are allocated along the customer sequence to encourage the leading customers' actions of successful recommendation and by demonstrating two general rules of awarding the referrals in our model setting. Moreover, the proposed solution approach helps deepen an understanding of the effect of the leading position, which is meaningful for designing more numerous referral approaches. Keywords: Networks, Network externalities, Customer sequence, Multi-sequence game, Referral 1. Introduction With the widespread phenomenon of the sharing economy, crowdfunding is gradually moving beyond its traditional functions, such as funding artistic or creative projects, and becoming a modern marketing mode with the aim of selling various types of products or services, typically through online platforms (Brown et al. 2017). For example, several E-commerce platforms, such as JD (https://z.jd.com/sceneIndex. html) and Taobao (https://izhongchou.taobao.com/index.htm), contain a crowdfunding-based marketing pattern that is gradually being used to market numerous categories of products and services, such as clothes, fruit, wine, electronic products and even household services. Faced with this new marketing mode, the core problem we consider here is how to provide several marketing strategies in general and, in particular, an applicable referral mechanism for the process of crowdfunding-based marketing patterns. Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] (Y. LI) 1 Generally, the crowdfunding process consists of three elements: the initiator who proposes the idea or project to be funded, the individuals or customers who support the idea, and a platform that brings the two parties together to conduct the crowdfunding (Mollick, 2014). If crowdfunding is understood to be a new marketing tool, it possesses several features. First, the crowdfunding initiator acts both as the sole producer and the seller of the crowdfunding project, although the producer and the seller are always different sections in the traditional supply chain. Second, crowdfunding has the function of market discovery; for example, if the crowdfunding is easily successful, it means that the targeted product or service is welcomed by the customers, and the initiator can in advance determine how many customers will buy the products or services, how much they will buy and who they are; if the crowdfunding is not successful until the deadline, the initiator can infer that the targeted product or service is not accepted by the market; thus, the initiator does not need to produce or to offer the good or the service. However, the traditional supply chain cannot perform as well as the crowdfunding because the traditional producer or seller cannot exactly know in advance whether the offered products or services will be accepted by customers or the extent of acceptance. Third, with the development of information technology, modern crowdfunding is much more dependent on online platforms; thus the word-of-mouth communication captured by local network externalities or the social learning embedded in social networks cannot be ignored, especially when potential consumers make their consumption decision and crowdfunding initiators offer their pricing and marketing strategies (Chu & Manchanda, 2016). Accordingly, when we study and explore the referral mechanism for the progress of crowdfunding-based marketing patterns, we should pay close attention to the abovementioned three features. Specifically, in response to the first feature, we need only consider two types of actors in our model -- the initiator and the customers -- because the crowdfunding initiator acts as both producer and seller. Furthermore, the initiator can be regarded as the monopolist within the launched crowdfunding project, so that the established model features the monopoly structure. Please note that, although many crowdfunding projects can be launched almost at the same time in online platforms, the substitutability between these projects is always very low because the crowdfunding project often highlights its originality. Thus, one crowdfunding can be understood as a monopoly market for the targeted project especially during the launched period, which is often not long. Next, with regard to the second feature, the information known in advance can facilitate gaining the amount of participating customers (or, say, the market size), the customer sequence (or, say, the order of each customer who participates in the crowdfunding) and even the relationships of those who successfully recommend others to participate. Lastly, once the third feature is identified, the network externalities should 2 be added into the analysis. In all, monopoly structure, customer sequence and network externalities are the three critical considerations in the process of solving the proposed research problem. Since the monopoly structure has been discussed widely in the literature related to Economics and Management, we put it aside first while turning to analyse the other two considerations: network externalities and customer sequence. Here, we will focus on how to reflect and to depict them in our model and, further, to provide some intuitions about their potential relationships with possible market strategies. With regards to network externalities, in recent years, numerous researchers such as Anderson et al. (2013) and Wang & Wang (2017) have considered and studied them in online E-commercial platforms, especially in the context of monopoly structure, such as Crapis (2017), Ajorlou (2017) and Shin (2017). Based on these studies, it would be a feasible idea to utilize network externalities to improve marketing effectiveness (Bimpikis et al. 2016). For example, we can find the important nodes with highly positive network externalities and design mechanisms to give play to these nodes in enlarging markets and increasing profits (Li et al. 2014). Following this idea, we consider network externalities and their effects on customers' consumption decisions: the utility derived by a consumer from consuming a targeted good or service is significantly affected by his/her network peers who also consume that good or service. With regards to the customer sequence, it is a common phenomenon that some customers come into a crowdfunding project earlier than others. The earlier customers can potentially recommend the good or the service to their social network peers in a social media platform, and thus, these earlier customers are able to affect the marketing effects or even the profits earned by the crowdfunding initiator (or the monopolist, hereafter). In such a case, the earlier customers are called the leading customers (or leaders, hereafter) and the latter ones are called the following customers (or followers, hereafter). In fact, the idea of the Stackelberg game (Stackelberg, 1952) can be adopted in our model to reflect the mutual effects between leaders and followers. Based on the three features of crowdfunding, the core idea of solving the research problem is to explore and measure the value of leading customers in the context of network externalities. Here, the value of leading customers is measured by the increased profits gained by the monopolist when some customers become the leaders from the known customer set. Once the value of the leading customers can be determined, we can calculate how much profit can be returned or awarded to the leading customers to raise their incentives to recommend more new customers. If so, the likelihood of successfully conducting a crowdfunding project can be increased. However, different customers can be located at different time points in the formed customer sequence, which means that some customers can be their earlier ones' followers and their later ones' leaders. Accordingly, one challenging problem is how to quantitatively allocate the awards to different customers 3 with different time stamps along the customer sequence. Fortunately, the idea of measuring the value of the leading customer can also be adopted in this complicated case, where the contributions of different customers to the increased profits earned by the monopolist can be similarly determined. Accordingly, once the different contributions can be determined, the quantitative model of encouraging the leading customers to enlarge their recommendations can be proposed. In other words, the proposed approach of allocating the increased profits along the customer sequence can be adopted to award the action of successfully recommending new customers. The remaining part of this section first reviews the related models in this field and then identifies our contributions. The following sections are organized as follows: Section 2 provides the sequential-move game model that highlights the three features: monopoly structure, network externalities and customer sequence; Section 3 presents the established model's consumption equilibrium and its optimal pricing strategy; Section 4 studies the relationship between our sequential-move game model and the known simultaneous-move game by way of matrix transformations and further discusses how to understand the influence of leading positions in the sequential-move game; Section 5 utilizes the results reported in Section 4 and focuses on measuring and illustrating the value of leading customers; Section 6 shows the application of our models and provides answers to the research problem; and lastly, Section 7 concludes. 1.1. Related work Aside from the abovementioned background of crowdfunding, our study is also related to the scientific problem of how to design a customer's utility function to reflect the local network externality. Fortunately, Ballester et al. (2006) established a quadratic utility function that can reflect the peer effect of local network externality, and then Candogan (2012) and Bloch & Querou (2013) extended this utility function by adding the prices offered by the monopolist into the utility function. Because the designed quadratic utility function facilitates the mathematical analysis and is also able to reflect the law of diminishing marginal utility, it has been widely adopted in recent years by, for example, Zhou & Chen (2015), Li et al. (2015), Fainmesser & Galeotti (2015) and Zhou & Chen (2017). As mentioned above, crowdfunding features the monopoly and the network externalities, and thus, the work by Candogan (2012) and Bloch & Querou (2013) inspire the current study's approach to designing the utility function with local network externalities. Accordingly, this paper inherits the customer's utility functions designed by Candogan et al. (2012) and Bloch & Querou (2013). Another important factor addressed here is the leading customer in the customer sequence, and we want to explore how the leader affects the followers' decisions and how the leading position affects the initiator's profits. Once the patterns of influence can be uncovered, we can provide marketing strategies by utilizing the 4 leading customer's effects (Bass, 1969; Kerin et al., 1992). In fact, starting from the Stackelberg game model (Stackelberg, 1952), the effect of the leading customer has gradually been considered by an increasing number of researchers. For example, Markides & Sosa (2013) discussed the advantages and disadvantages of leading positions, and Klingebiel & Joseph (2016) revealed how firms make decisions on becoming the leading mover in innovation in the case of mobile phone technologies. Especially in the context of local network externalities, Zhou & Chen (2015) adopted the utility function designed by Ballester et al. (2006), analysed a two-stage game and then provided the approach to finding the key players in social networks. However, the work of Zhou & Chen (2015) does not consider the effect of the monopoly or generally the producers and sellers in the real market, but their idea is important for us in modelling the customer sequence. From this perspective, our work can be regarded as extending that of Zhou & Chen (2015) into a real market situation containing not only customers but also producers and sellers. In addition, our paper focuses on measuring the value of leading customers, aims to provide an applicable referral mechanism, and is thus different from Zhou & Chen (2015) and their extended work (Zhou & Chen, 2017). 1.2. Contributions As crowdfunding is a relatively new phenomenon and a gradual marketing mode, the literature on crowdfunding has been growing.. Although these previous studies discuss many important problems in crowdfunding, such as the optimal pricing mechanism (Hu et al. 2014), the success likelihood (Parhankangas & Renko, 2017) and many others not mentioned, few studies focus on how to introduce the referral mechanism into a crowdfunding-based market pattern, let alone utilizing the network externalities to provide a network-based referral mechanism. More specifically, then, this paper not only analysed three features of modern crowdfunding -- monopoly structure, network externalities and customer sequence -- but also modelled them to offer several new management insights into how to increase the crowdfunding initiator's profits and how to raise the success likelihood of crowdfunding. Second, this paper supplemented the theories of customer power by revealing a new customer power called by leading effect, which can be understood as a kind of demonstration effect. Traditionally, customer power is often understood as the ability of a customer to influence the decisions of a manufacturer (Brown et al., 1995; Goodman and Dion, 2001) and is divided into five sources: expert power, referent power, legitimate power, reward power and coercive power (Maloni & Benton, 2000). However, the measured value of the leading customer in this paper can be regarded as another customer power because the measured value can tell who can cause a larger profit increase when they become the leading customers. Accordingly, the contribution to uncovering another customer power will benefit the design of a network-based referral mechanism. 5 Note that one recent work (Zhou & Chen, 2017) that studied the optimal pricing with sequential consumption in networks found that the optimal sequence should be a chain structure. Although our model setting is quite similar to the cited work, our research aim is quite different. First, our work focuses on measuring the value of leading customers by solving the sequential-move game and further proposing an applicable network-based referral mechanism; however, the work of Zhou & Chen (2017) focused on finding the key players in a sequential-move game, uncovering the optimal sequence structure that causes the largest profit of the monopolist as well as comparing the different effects of symmetric and asymmetric social interactions on the pricing mechanism and the achieved profits. Second, although a similar solution technique was adopted in our work and that of Zhou & Chen (2017), our study focused on adopting the solution technique to link the sequential-move game with the equivalent simultaneous-move game and further deepening our understanding the effect of leading positions, whereas the work of Zhou & Chen (2017) did not focus on such problems. These differences, in our opinion, constitute one of our contributions. In fact, when we began this work and had finished most of it, the work of Zhou & Chen (2017) had not been published publicly in SSRN; thus, although some of the results in this paper, such as Lemma 2, are consistent with the work of Zhou & Chen (2017), the proof processes are quite different. However, despite these differences and although the main contributions are different, we cannot deny that the work of Candogan et al. (2012), Zhou & Chen (2015) and Zhou & Chen (2017) is foundational in this field and provides the important idea and basic framework for our study. 2. Model setup 2.1. Utility function with referral network As we have explained, the crowdfunding-based marketing pattern consists of one monopolist who provides  of consumers embedded in an information network that a divisible good and a finite set {1,2, n , } N  reflects the local network externality. Here, let the adjacency matrix IN represent the information network, and if customers i and j can share information with each other, the ij-entry and ji-entry of the matrix IN are assigned as 1; otherwise, they are assigned as 0. Based on the real existing network IN, we further introduce and design a referral network R into the crowdfunding-based marketing pattern. Similar to the information network IN, the ij-entry of R denoted as successfully recommend customer i to participate and ijr also takes two values: ijr  , which means customer j IN  or ijr  by considering that sharing information is the precondition of ijr  , which means not. Accordingly, 1 0 1 1 ij IN  is the sufficient condition of 1 ji 6 recommendation; what's more, the referral network R is direct because the action of successful recommendation is naturally direct, whereas the information network IN is indirect. The established model will focus on the referral network g with the aim of how it influences the monopolist's profit and how to design it to increase the monopolist's profit. Following the traditional utility form adopted in Candogan et al. (2012) and Bloch & Quérou (2013) as mentioned in the Related work section, we inherit the utility function of quadratic form, but we focus on the effect of our introduced referral network. In other words, although the network externality can originate from many aspects and takes many forms, this paper focuses on the effect of referral network. In this paper, we pay attention to two kinds of effects from the introduced referral network on the customer' utility: one is the influence from the referrers and the other comes from the successfully recommended customers. In other words, the utility of customer i is not only affected by the customers who recommend the good to him/her but also affected by the customers who successfully accept his/her recommendation, and further, we allow the different influence strengths from the two directions. Let  represent the different strengths, where 1 means the latter effect is stronger than the former and 1 0  means the opposite. Accordingly, the specific utility function of customer i is designed as    x i   influence from referrers influence from the successfully recommended customers x x 2   i i i i  effect from individual preference    u x ( i i r x ji r x ij 1 2 ; x x i  , p i )   i n j 1  n j 1   j   j p x   i i purcha se cost , (1a) where ix is the amount that consumer i decides to purchase, ix is the consumption vector except ip is the price offered to consumer i by the monopolist for one unit of the divisible good. Aside from the explained two effects in the middle of Equation (1a), two other important effects are also consumer i, and consuming one more unit of the good, and represent the preference level of consumer i on the good; furthermore, considered in the designed utility function. For the effect from individual preference, i together i measures the added utility by i reflects the law of decreasing margin utility. For the purchase ix units of the good; in addition, the offer ip can be different for different customers by noting that the monopolist enables price discrimination for different consumers according to their various purchasing time as well as positions in the referral network. cost, the last term measures the cost of consumer i by purchasing i and price To facilitate expressing the results, we sum the two effects of referral network together to establish a new comprehensive network g of which the ij-entry is expressed as g ij r   r ij 7 , (1b) ji and then, the designed utility function in Equation (1a) can be simplified as x i u x ( i i x 2  i i x  i i g x ij ; x   , p i )  i   j 1 2   n j 1   p x i i , (1c) whose form is identical with Candogan et al. (2012) and Bloch & Quérou (2013); however, the implication of the contained network is completely different. Moreover, the complicated form shown in Equation (1a) will also be useful to uncovering the implications of leading positions as well as to comparing the two effects (i.e., influence from referrers and influence from the successfully recommended customers) on increasing the monopolist's profit. 2.2. Profit function with differential pricing In our model set, the monopolist is allowed to conduct complete price discrimination, and therefore customers can be offered different prices according to their preferences, purchasing sequence and network positions. Although obstacles can exist to hold back complete price discrimination in real markets, this assumption will also be useful in providing several foundational theoretical results. Next, the same production cost c is assumed for each unit of the good, and then the monopolist faces the following profit function (  x p i i , )   n i 1  ( p i  c x ) i . (2) Naturally, the monopolist will pursue the largest profits in the market by offering an optimal pricing strategy. In addition, we also assume that the monopolist can grasp the information network between customers, further enabling control the formation of the referral network. In fact, it is not that surprising that the monopolist can grasp some information about customers, especially in the era of big data, because many social media platforms and numerous online shopping websites have been collecting customers' information day and night and can sell the relevant information to the monopolist. 2.3. Customer sequence embedded in the information network It is a common phenomenon that some customers purchase a good earlier than others and then are likely to advertise that good along their local information network. To illustrate this phenomenon, we first divide all the customers into two categories: the leader category and the follower category, as the basic case. Further, to simplify their description, the first m consumers numbered from 1 to m are set as the leaders and the remaining N m consumers numbered from m+1 to N are set as the followers in our basic model, and their sets are denoted as a and b, respectively. However, the ideal case is to divide the customers into two categories, as mentioned above. In real markets, 8 customers can comprise more than two categories in their purchasing sequence. To this end, the whole N customers are divided into k parts, where k is an integer and parts of customers are denoted as 1t , sequence set  that satisfies t   , 2t ,  , T t t , t : { ,  1 t , }k 2 i j 2 k  . According to their purchasing order, the k kt , respectively. As a result, these parts constitute the   and i j   i k it 1  . n The two kinds of participants -- the monopolist and the customers with purchasing sequence -- form a game in which the monopolist decides the price offered to each customer and the customers decide their consumptions. In our model, when the leader parts make their consumption decision, they will consider the responses of the monopolist and the follower parts; and when the follower parts make their consumption decision, the leaders' consumption is known information for them and they will only consider the response of the monopolist. To clarify, we first discuss the basic case and then extend it to the complicated case. Note that the solution of these cases establish a theoretical foundation to measure the value of leading customers and, further, to propose an applicable referral mechanism in the context of network externality in general and crowdfunding-based marketing patterns in particular. 3. Basic model, solutions and discussions 3.1. Solution process for the basic model Note that the basic model considers that all the customers are only divided into two categories: the leader set and the follower set. Hence, following the work of Candogan et al. (2012), Bloch & Quérou (2013) and Zhou & Chen (2015), the whole solution process for the basic model consists of three steps. Step 1: Solving the followers' consumption strategy. Let x : a ( x x , a a 1 2 ,..., T x a m ) and x : b ( x b m 1  , x b m  2 ,..., x b N T ) denote the leaders' and the followers' consumption vectors, respectively. When the followers make their consumption strategy, ax is regarded as known for them by considering that the followers can directly observe the leaders' announced order in the online platform. Accordingly, the followers' consumption strategy can be achieved by maximizing their utilities, given the prices offered by the monopolist and the leaders' consumption, i.e., N 2,..., j m  , ( m 1,  x x p   x ) , a u y ( j b j , b  j b j j arg max y [0, )   b j ). (3) As a result, the solution of the above formula can lead to the following optimal response function: fx 1( b x p , (4) a ) , where the vector p consists of the offered price of each customer and 1f is a quasi-linear function by 9 considering the quadratic form of the utility function. The optimal response function allows bx to be explicitly expressed by the variables ax and p , which lay the foundation for the next stages and further solutions. Step 2: Solving the leaders' consumption strategy. By substituting Equation (4) into the leaders' utility function utilities can be transferred as the function of ax and p , i.e., v i ( b a , the leaders' consumption strategy can be achieved by maximizing  m , u i f 1 ), the leaders' iu x x p ( ( ) x x p , , a a 1,2,..., x p p . Accordingly, ) : a  iv x p with the following specific ( ), ) i , ( ( ) , a expression: x a i  v y arg max ( a i i a y i [0,   ) , x p , ( a  ) , i i  1,2,..., m ). (5) Similar to the solution process of Step 1, Equation (5) also leads to the optimal response function of the leaders' consumptions to the offered prices, i.e., fx a p , (6) 2( ) where 2f is also a quasi-linear function following the same reasons of 1f . Then, by substituting Equation (6) into Equation (4), bx can further be simplified as the function of the offered prices, specifically b x :  f 3 p ( )  f 1 ( f 2 p p . (7) ( ), ) Step 3: The monopolist's pricing strategy. Recalling Equation (2), the profit function of the monopolist can further be expressed as the function of the price vector p by substituting Equations (6) and (7), i.e., a    p ( ) x x    p  b T b  T p    f f 2 3 p ( ) p ( )    , (8) and therefore, the optimal pricing strategy of the monopolist can be immediately achieved by maximizing the profit ( )b p in Equation (8); i.e., p * arg max ( )b p . (9) Next, the optimal consumption strategies ax and bx can be achieved by substituting *p into Equations (6) and (7), respectively. Note that the price in the optimal pricing strategy is allowed to be less than c or even less than 0, and thus, no constraints are set for the targeted pricing strategy, because we allow the monopolist to pay some consumers if the total profit can be raised. 3.2. Assumptions and solutions of basic model The comprehensive network g defined in Section 2.1 is divided into four parts by the two categories of 10 customers: g aa ba     g g ab bb g g    . (10) Based on this expression, Assumptions 1 and 2 are discussed first to guarantee reasonable solutions. [Assumption 1] Each customer's preference parameter that the following two matrixes bb  β g and b b :  β ( m aa β g a   ,   , a , ( diag    m :  β denotes the diagonal matrix consisting of the diagonal elements of diag   m  N  , , 1  ) , , ,  1 2 2  diag i is assumed to be large enough to guarantee g A g ab b ba are invertible, where A g A g ab b ba ( g : [   β g A g . □ ab ba diag g A g b , and ] bb  1 ) ) ab ba ( ) b b b Assumption 1 guarantees that the law of diminishing marginal utility plays a dominant role even if the network effects are considered. Generally, this assumption is often met in the real market because the customer's decision is often rational, or at least to some extent. Otherwise, if the influence of the network effect plays a dominant role, some customers will buy the goods as much as possible. In most common cases, the extreme phenomenon seldom appears in the real market, and thus, Assumption 1 guarantees a common case in real markets. [Assumption 2] c  holds for all the customers. □ i Assumption 2 guarantees that the achieved optimal consumption vector is no less than zero by recalling Equation (13). In fact, this assumption means that all the concerned customers in the market truly need the good offered by the monopolist. It is true that some customers do not need the good; however, these customers do not come into our consideration, as they do not participate in the crowdfunding project. Based on the two assumptions and the three steps in Section 3.1, the results of the basic model are achieved below. [Result 1] (Solutions of basic model). When the customers are divided into two categories -- leader set and follower set -- the optimal consumption vector sex of the customers is x M M 1 , (11) c )   se α ] ( T 1    1  [ the optimal offered price vector sep is p se   α M M M  [ 1   1  α ] ( T 1   1 , (12) c ) and, accordingly, the largest profit se gained by the monopolist is ] T  1 M M c ) [ T α (  1    se   2 1 α (  1 c ) . (13) Here, matrix M has the specific form: 11 M     B a se A g B ba b a se b ab a se b B g A a se ba b A A g B g A  ab . (14)    b Proof. See Appendix A for details. □ It is worth noting that the achieved optimal solutions are all highlighted by the subscript "se" to differentiate between the results of the simultaneous-move game. 3.3. Relationship with the simultaneous-move game The basic model belongs to a sequential-move game, and thus, an interesting question we want to explore is whether a sequential-move game can be transformed into an equivalent simultaneous-move game, where the "equivalent" means the two kinds of game shares the identical results. If the answer is yes, we can further cope with the extended model with a complicated customer sequence by considering that the equivalent simultaneous-move game is comparatively easy to solve. To this end, we first recall the work of Candogan et al. (2012) on the simultaneous-move game under a similar model setting to ours, except that all the customers in Candogan et al. (2012) make their consumption decisions simultaneously. To distinguish the sequential-move game, we use the subscript "si" to denote the simultaneous-move game, and the relevant results of Candogan et al. (2012) are listed below. [Result 2] (The simultaneous-move game dealt with by Candogan et al. (2012)). The optimal consumption vector six of all the customers is where A : [   β 1 g ] and : β x si  [ A 1   A  α ] ( T 1   1 , (15) c ) diag    )N . The optimal offered price vector ( , , , sip is 1 p si 2 α A A A    [ 1   1  α ] ( T 1   1 , (16) c ) and accordingly, the largest profit si gained by the monopolist is α ] ( 1  1 A c ) [ T α ( A  T   1  si   2  1 c ) . (17) □ By comparing Result 1 and Result 2, we find that the two results share similar mathematical expressions except for matrixes M and A. Accordingly, the key to linking the two kinds of games is to uncover the relation between the two matrixes M and A. To answer this question, matrix A is further re-expressed as A    [ β 1 g ]   aa g a   β g ba      ab g  b   β bb g  1         B a si ba b A g B a si b ab a si b B g A a si ba b A A g B g A  ab , (18)    b B where :a si    a β   aa g  g A g ab b ba  1   . Thus, the two matrixes M and A share a similar structure, except for 12 a the difference between siB , an a seB . The subtle difference inspires us to transform the matrix g to equate the sequential-move game with the simultaneous-move game in our model setting. As a result, siB . Now, by focusing on the difference between a seB and ) ab additional term diag g A g b ( a seB and ba is found in a let 'g be the transformed matrix from g , and its specific expression is provided in Lemma 1. [Lemma 1] (The specific expression of 'g ). Let 'aag = aa g diag g A g b ab ( ba ) and the remaining three parts in 'g remain identical to the corresponding parts in g , then the optimal consumption, the optimal pricing strategy and the optimal profit achieved from the simultaneous-move game under 'g are equal to those from the sequential-move game under g . Proof. See Appendix B for details. □ As shown in Lemma 1, when customer i is a leading customer, the effect of his/her leading position in the sequential-move game can be reflected by adding some value simultaneous-move game. Note that before the matrix transformation, to the corresponding iig  according to our model setting. Lemma 1 is important in understanding the relationship between the simultaneous-move game with iig in 0 the sequential-move game in our model setting. In addition, the matrix M obtained in the process of the sequential-move game is not convenient for mathematical expression and theoretical analysis, and therefore it is meaningful to find an equivalent simultaneous-move game for ease of mathematical analysis. Lastly, the idea of matrix transformation is useful not only for the case in which the customers are divided into two categories but also for the case in which the customers are divided into multiple categories according to their purchasing sequences. 3.4. Discussions Unlike the results reported in Ballester (2006) and Zhou & Chen (2015), the optimal consumption of our model is related to the matrix g ( ' g ' ) / 2 T rather than the matrix g or 'g . The difference originates from the consideration of the monopolist and the pricing mechanism. Further, the difference will vanish when the matrix g or 'g is symmetric according to their mathematical expressions. Thus, the intuition behind the above finding is that the monopolist's power of price discrimination is rooted in the asymmetry of the influence matrix. Note that 'g ' T g measures the difference in influence between each pair of customers, and then by following the interpretation provided in Candogan et al. (2012), the offered price for one customer is positively affected by how much the customer is influenced by her central peers, whereas the price is meanwhile negatively affected by the influence the customer exerts on central agents. Therefore, if one customer can influence the others much more and be influenced by the others much less, the offered price 13 for the customer will be much more favourable, which can be interpreted as the price compensation for customers who exert influence. 4. Extended model and discussions 4.1. Solutions of extended model As we have stated, the customer sequence always contains multiple categories rather than the two categories discussed in the basic model. Accordingly, when the customer sequence contains k parts ( according to their purchasing time, we denote that these parts constitute the sequence set T t : { ,  1 t 2 , Thus, the above proven Lemma 1 directly guarantees that the following Result 3 holds. k  ) 2  . t , }k [Result 3] (Solutions of extended model). Given the customers' purchasing sequence set T, the optimal consumption vector Tx , the optimal price vector Tp and the optimal profit T in this extend case have the following specific expressions: x T    β    g T  1 T T g  2    1 c α   2     , (19) p T  1 c  α  2  g T T T  g  2    g T   β  1 T T g  2    1 c α   2     , (20) and  T  1 c α  2    T       g T   β  1 T T g  2    1 c α  2       . (21) Here, the relationship between g t t T  k k g t t k k and  :   β where A  T t i k i 1    j t t j j Tg and g is g g diag (   t i k i t i k i  j 1    )(  . 1  ) g t t j T j g (  T j 1    t j (  t i k i 1    j ) A  T t i k i 1    j g (  t i k i 1    j ) t j ) , j   k 1, k   , (22) ,1 2, Proof. See Appendix C for details. □ Result 3 provides the recursive form of receiving the targeted matrix Tg , which extends the basic model. Thus far, no matter how many categories are contained by the customer sequence, the proven Result 3 is the approach for transforming it into the equivalent simultaneous-move game to provide direct results. 4.2. Comparisons with the simultaneous-move game In our model setting, if all the customers make their consumption decisions simultaneously, how does each customer's optimal consumption and the monopolist's optimal profit change? The following Lemma 2 provides the answer, where two matrixes x and y satisfy x y if and only if x i j ( , )  y i j ( , ) ,   . j N ,i [Lemma 2] (Comparing the customers' optimal consumption vectors and the monopolist's optimal 14 profits of two games). Given the customers' purchasing sequence set T, let six ) denote the optimal si ) denote the highest profit of the monopolist in the sequential-move . In addition, when g is an sex (or x and six se   si consumption vector and se (or game (or simultaneous-move game). Thus, it holds that six se upper or a lower triangular matrix, it holds that x and   si se se . Proof. See Appendix D for details. □ Furthermore, from the perspective of the monopolist, the existence of leading customers will increase or at least not decrease the monopolist's profit, and thus, cultivating some leading customers will benefit the monopolist. Additionally, Lemma 2 lays a foundation to measure the value of leading customers, which is the focus of the next section. Before discussing this value, however, we further pay attention to the offered price vectors Tg T in the two kinds of games. By recalling Equations (16) and (20), the fact that g g T  sep and T sip g guarantees that p se  p si  T   g g  2  Effect from Matrix asymmetry  1  1 T β T T g     1 α c            2       Effect from inne r preference Effect from adding leading consumers g g  2    g  2          T β , (23) which shows that the difference between sep and leading consumers' addition and inner preference. Accordingly, the properties of the relation between sip originates from three effects: matrix asymmetry, sep and sip are obtained in Lemma 3. [Lemma 3]. (Comparing the offered price vector of two games). (1) When g is a symmetric matrix, sip se Proof. The first part is obvious by recalling Equation (22), and the second part originates from the proof p ; (2) when g is an upper or a lower triangular matrix, p . sip se process of Lemma 2, where it is shown that T g g if g is an upper or a lower triangular matrix. □ Moreover, the existence of leading customers does not guarantee that sip se p or sip se p . However, in most cases, adding or cultivating the leading customers will increase the monopolist's profit, which can be paid special attention to by introducing the referral mechanism. 4.3. Discussion From Lemma 1 and Result 3, we find that only the diagonal elements of the leading customers increase compared to the original matrix g . Accordingly, we can also understand the effect of leading customers from the perspective of i by noting that    β g ( '  g T  1 ' ) / 2  or    β ( g T  g T T ) / 2   1 always appear in the result as a whole. In other words, a leading customer i with his/her preference parameter i in the 15 sequential-move game is equivalent to a customer with a new preference parameter 'i i  in the simultaneous-move game. Namely, the advantage of a leading position in the sequential-move game can be transferred to be a decrease in the preference parameter adopted utility function in Equation (1), i in the simultaneous-move game. Recalling the i measures the decreasing effect of marginal utility so that a smaller value means a lower decreasing effect. 5. The value of leading customers This section aims to utilize the above proven lemmas and results to provide an applicable network-based referral mechanism. Because Lemma 2 has demonstrated that adding or cultivating some leading customers will increase the monopolist's profit in most cases, we can accordingly define the value of leading customers from the perspective of increased profit. Next, recalling the designed referral network in Equation (1), we can use the defined value of leading customers to reward the leading customers to encourage them to form the referral network. Based on this basic idea, we further explore the properties and present the potential application of the provided network-based referral mechanism. 5.1. Definition and example The monotonicity of the monopolist's profit helps us measure the value of the leading customers, and then Definition 1 provides the formal expressions. [Definition 1] Given the customer sequence T t : { ,  1 t 2 ,  , t , t j ,  , we denote t , } k j 1  T j   t k 2 ) } and define T (0) : T ; then the value of leading customer set , 2 , t t   t ,j ( ) : { , 1 jt is denoted as j 1  t ( t  j value t ( )j with the following expression: value t  se ) :  ( j ( g )   se ( g T j ( ) T j ( 1)  ) , (24) where the profit function ( ) se  has been shown in Equation (21). □ Next, two basic network structures are presented as examples to provide an intuitive understanding of the definition and to further illustrate some interesting findings. Panel A: Star network Panel B: Hierarchical network Fig. 1. Two basic network structures 16 As shown in Fig. 1, the adopted two basic networks contain the same number of nodes and links, which can be regarded as two typical basic structures of a complex network. According to Definition 1, Table 1 displays the values of leading customer sets under different customer sequences. Table 1. The values of leading customer sets under different customer sequences. star network hierarchical network value of leading customer profit value of leading customer profit 0.3929 0.4382 0.3977 0.4189 0.4067 ---- value({1})=0.0124 value({2})=0.0249 value({2})=0.0249; value({1,3})=0 value({2})=0.0249; value({4,5})=0 value({1,2})=0.0214 0.3800 0.3924 0.4049 0.4049 0.4049 0.4014 Case No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 customer sequence {1,2,3,4,5} ---- {1},{2,3,4,5} value({1})=0.0453 {2},{1,3,4,5} value({2})=0.0048 {2},{1,3},{4,5} {2},{4,5},{1,3} value({2})=0.0048; value({1,3})=0.0212 value({2})=0.0048; value({4,5})=0.0090 value({1,2})=0.0321 5 0 i  and Note. In this example, {1,2},{3,4,5} i  , 1 0.4250 ic  , for any i N . By comparing these results, the following findings can be summarized. Although two networks share the same number of nodes and links, the profit of the monopolist is different according to case No. 1. Accordingly, the network structure in itself can influence profits, and thus, some network structures are preferred by the monopolist. In addition, by comparing case No. 2 and No. 3, choosing different leading customers will lead to different profits, and thus, the strategy of choosing the leading customer set is meaningful for the monopolist in increasing the achieved profit. Moreover, the difference between case No. 4 and No. 5 illustrates that the order of the customer sequence will be a factor that influences the profit of the monopolist. Accordingly, when the customer sequence comprises more than two sets, it will be an interesting problem to determine the optimal customer sequence to achieve the largest profit. Last but not least, it must not increase the profit that more nodes are chosen as the leading customers by comparing cases No. 6 and No. 2. Specifically, compared with case No. 2, the profit decreases when adding node 2 into the leading customer set in the star network, whereas the hierarchical network shows the opposite. Accordingly, the relationship between the achieved profit and the amount of leading customers is not monotonous. 5.2. Network-based referral strategy Aside from the above interesting findings, this subsection focuses on coping with exactly how many rewards should be allocated to the leading customers if they benefit enlarging the purchase of the targeted product, especially in the crowdfunding-based marketing pattern. Note that the approach of allocating 17 rewards along the referral network is the core of providing the referral mechanism. Specifically, as an advertising strategy, the monopolist enables rewarding the existing customers who successfully recommend some newcomers to participate in the crowdfunding. One direct problem is exactly how much of a reward should be allocated. As we have explained, the defined value of leading customers can be a tool to cope with the problem. On the one hand, when a newcomer participates in the crowdfunding, the values of the leading customers are likely to change, which can quantitatively reflect the effect of a successful recommendation. On the other hand, the change in the values of the leading customers originates from the change in the monopolist's profits, so it is helpful for the mechanism design of marketing, especially when social learning becomes more and more important with the development of modern crowdfunding. Before going into details, we first answer a fundamental question: will adding a new customer increase or at least not decrease all the leading customers' values no matter what their sequence positions are? If the answer is YES, we can argue that each leading customer with a direct or indirect influence on the newcomer will benefit from the arrival of a new customer. Lemma 4 provides the answer. [Lemma 4] Given the customer sequence T t : { ,  1 shown in Equation (1b), a newcomer denoted as the new customer sequence is denoted as value t T holds for any ( ) j of leading customer set t : { ,  1 T 1  k , } t , 2   , where jt in the customer sequence {1,2, j , j j , t , t 1   t , } k  and the comprehensive network g t , 2 1kt  is added into the customer sequence and then the value t T    , } value t T value t T represent the value 1 1T and T , respectively. . As a result, and 1  j ( ) ( k 1  , t , t , t t j ) 1 i ) ( j k , i Proof. See Appendix E for details. □ Lemma 4 actually points out that when a newcomer is added at the end of the customer sequence, all the leading customers of the newcomer will not decrease their leading values. Based on the theoretic basis of Lemma 4, Equation (24) further guides us to measure the newcomer's contributions on increasing each leading customer's value. To clarify, one example is provided below, where Panel A of Fig. 2 displays a simple comprehensive network comprising four customers with their customer sequence {{1},{2},{3},{4}} and Panel B of Fig. 2 displays a new customer's arrival and their customer sequence is changed into {{1},{2},{3},{4},{5}} . Next, given that all the customers share the identical preference parameters, each leading customer's value and their changes in adding a new comer are listed in Table 2. Table 2 validates the result of Lemma 4, where all the leading customer's value increases. As displayed in Fig. 2, new customer No. 5 is recommended by customer No. 4, so that the pair have direct influence. Furthermore, the leading customers at different sequence positions truly increase at different values; the value 18 directly influenced by the newcomer has the largest increase and is called the rule of "closeness", and an earlier leading customer has a lower value increase and is called the rule of "decreasing". By recalling the background provided in the Introduction, another finding emerging from this example is that not only does the one who directly recommends the new comer benefit from the newcomer's arrival, but the earlier leading customers also benefit, although they only have indirect influence. Table 2. Each leading customer's value and the change. Increased Panel A 1 2 3 4 Panel A: Original customer sequence 1 2 3 4 5 Panel B: A new customer's arrival Fig. 2. Two customer sequences. {1} {2} {3} {4} ---- i  , 1 Note. Leading value 0.0038 0.0057 0.0056 0 ---- i  , 5 Panel B Leading value 0.0038 0.0058 0.0063 0.0057 {1} {2} {3} {4} {5} value +0.0000 +0.0001 +0.0007 +0.0057 0 ---- 1 for any i N . ic  and 0 Inspired by this simple example, we further pay close attention to the general rule of the proposed network-based referral strategy. Thus far, we know that adding a newcomer will increase the leading values of these customers along the referral line and we also present the approach of calculating the increased leading values. Next, we illustrate the two rules discovered in the above simple example to facilitate the crowdfunding initiator to reward the related leading customers owing to their successful recommendations. Furthermore, our model only allows that one newcomer accepts one existing customer's recommendation, although the newcomer can actually receive several customers' information; in other words, each customer has at most one referrer. The above-mentioned mechanism of acceptance will ease the allocations of rewards because all the related leading customers constitute a line network. Deepening the analysis of the above simple example, Property 1 provides the general rules for allocating the increased profits from the newcomer in our proposed network-based referral strategy. [Property 1] (General rules of proposed network-based referral strategy). The rule of "closeness" and the rule of "decreasing" should be adopted when allocating the increased profits from the newcomer along the line network consisting of the related leading customers, given that all the customers share the identical preference parameters. Proof. See Appendix F for details. □ To sum up, customers can be encouraged by obtaining rewards when they successfully recommend newcomers to participate. Especially with the development of the sharing economy, for example, as in a 19 crowdfunding-based marketing pattern, it becomes more convenient and even important for customers to utilize their social networks to recommend the targeted product. This subsection provides an alternative approach to how to encourage customers who make successful recommendations, as well as of determining exactly how many profits should be allocated. More precisely, the two rules demonstrated in Property 1 can qualitatively guide the monopolist in how to allocate the additional profits to each leading customer when a new customer comes into the market. Specifically, the customer who directly recommends and affects the newcomer will be allocated most of the profits because this customer contributes most to the new customer's entrance into the market, and the earlier customer in the line network should be allocated much less, given the longer distance to the newcomer. In addition, the proven Lemma 2 provides a quantitative approach to coping with how much profit should actually be returned based on the calculated values of leading customers. 5.3. Discussion Recalling the utility function defined in Equation (1a), there are two effects discussed and considered. One is the influence of the referrers and the other is the influence of the successfully recommended followers. In the real market, modern technology allows us to record the information of successful recommendation, and thus, the referral network R is clear, especially in the online crowdfunding-based marketing platform. The remaining problem is how the strength parameter  affects the strategy of allocation, and Property 2 provides the answer. [Property 2]. (The effect of strength parameter ). When 0 , each leading customer's value equals 0 in our model setting. In addition, each leading customer's value increases with the rise of . Proof. When 0 , the comprehensive matrix g becomes a lower triangular matrix, and thus, Lemma 2 (22) guarantee that a larger  means larger diagonal elements in guarantees that each leading customer's value equals 0 in our model setting. In addition, Equations (21) and Tg and will thus cause a larger value of each leading customer. □ Property 2 points out that if the leading customers are not affected by their followers' consumption decisions (i.e., 0 ), the leading values vanish or say the leading positions do not take effect. However, if the leading customers are greatly influenced by their followers' consumption decisions (i.e., a larger ), the leading positions become much more valuable. In a real market, when some customers accept the recommendation, the referrer truly increases his/her utility because some peers agree with the targeted project, as the referrer has, and meanwhile much larger amounts consumed by the followers means a higher increase in utility. Thus,  should be larger than 0 in a real market in most cases. Following the result of Property 2, 20 if we can obtain each customer's information about his/her reaction to their peers' consumption decision in advance, the ones with a much greater reaction should be chosen as the leading ones from the perspective of  when the other influence factors prove identical. 6. Conclusions Currently, crowdfunding is gradually becoming a modern marketing mode via the Internet. Facing this trend, we aim to provide feasible marketing strategies to promote modern crowdfunding-based crowdfunding patterns. To this end, we first analysed the features of modern crowdfunding-based marketing patterns and find the following three features: monopoly structure, network externalities and customer sequence. Building on the work of Candogan et al. (2012), Zhou & Chen (2015) and Zhou & Chen (2017), we defined the value of leading customers by solving the game models (i.e., basic model and extended model) contained within the above three features. Based on the solution of a basic model comprising only leaders and followers, the relationship between the simultaneous-move game and sequence-move game is revealed, and then the extended model whose customer sequence consists of more than two sets is further solved. According to the defined leading customer's values, we further focus on providing a network-based referral mechanism in the crowdfunding-based market pattern by exploring how to allocate rewards along the customer sequence according to their leading values and by uncovering the rules and properties of the proposed network-based referral mechanism. The main marketing strategies for promoting crowdfunding-based marketing patterns are summarized as follows. When a customer sequence with more than two customer sets is actually formed, the crowdfunding initiator can also earn greater profits by rewarding the leading customers for utilizing their social networks for recommendation. The demonstrated strategies for allocating the rewards have the following rules: (1) the customer who directly recommends the newcomer will be allocated the most additional profits and (2) the earlier leading customer in the line network should be allocated fewer profits, or exactly exponentially decreasing profits. We tend to believe that the proposed quantitative strategies are easy to operate in a real market. Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71501034 and 71771041, and by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant 2016M590230 and 2017T100183. 21 References Ajorlou, A., Jadbabaie, A., & Kakhbod, A. (2016). Dynamic Pricing in Social Networks: The Word-of-Mouth Effect. Management Science, Articles in Advance, doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2657 Anderson Jr, E. G., Parker, G. G., & Tan, B. (2013). Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 152-172. Ballester, C., Calvó-Armengol, A., & Zenou, Y. (2006). Who's who in networks. wanted: the key player. Econometrica, 74(5), 1403-1417. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management science, 15(5), 215-227. Bimpikis, K., Ozdaglar, A., & Yildiz, E. (2016). Competitive targeted advertising over networks. Operations Research, 64(3), 705-720. Bloch, F., & Quérou, N. (2013). Pricing in social networks. Games and economic behavior, 80, 243-261. Brown, T. E., Boon, E., & Pitt, L. F. (2017). Seeking funding in order to sell: Crowdfunding as a marketing tool. Business Horizons, 60(2), 189-195. Burtch, G., A. Ghose, and S. Wattal (2013). An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Investment Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 499-519. Candogan, O., Bimpikis, K., & Ozdaglar, A. (2012). Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Operations Research, 60(4), 883-905. Chu, J., & Manchanda, P. (2016). Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Science, 35(6), 870-893. Crapis D, Ifrach B, Maglaras C, et al. (2016). Monopoly Pricing in the Presence of Social Learning. Management Science, 63(11), 3586-3608. Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. Du, C., Cooper, W. L., & Wang, Z. (2016). Optimal pricing for a multinomial logit choice model with network effects. Operations Research, 64(2), 441-455. Fainmesser, I. P., & Galeotti, A. (2015). Pricing network effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 165-198. Goemans, M. X., & Williamson, D. P. (1995). Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM, 42(6), 1115-1145. Goodman, L.E., & Dion, P.A. (2001). The determinants of commitment in the distributor -- supplier 22 relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 30 (3), 287 -- 300. Haglin, D. J., & Venkatesan, S. M. (1991). Approximation and intractability results for the maximum cut problem and its variants. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 40(1), 110-113. Hu, M., Li, X., & Shi, M. (2014). Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Science, 34(3), 331-345. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 33-52. Klingebiel, R., & Joseph, J. (2016). Entry timing and innovation strategy in feature phones. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1002-1020. Li, Y., Wu, C., Gülen, G., & Wang, J. (2015). Network structure, perception level, and participants' welfares. Complexity, 21(1), 349-362. Li, Y., Wu, C., Wang, X., & Luo, P. (2014). A network-based and multi-parameter model for finding influential authors. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 791-799. Maloni, M., Benton,W.C.(2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics,21 (1), 49 -- 73. Markides, C., & Sosa, L. (2013). Pioneering and first mover advantages: the importance of business models. Long Range Planning, 46(4), 325-334. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215-236. Shin, E. (2017). Monopoly pricing and diffusion of social network goods. Games & Economic Behavior, 102(1), 162-178. Smith, S., F. Windmeijer, and E. Wright (2014). Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field. The Economic Journal, 125(6), 1053-1071 Strausz, R. (2017). A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1430-76. Tomczak, A. and A. Brem (2013). A Conceptualized Investment Model of Crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 15(4), 335-359. Von Stackelberg, H. (1952). The theory of the market economy. Oxford University Press. Wang, R., & Wang, Z. (2016). Consumer Choice Models with Endogenous Network Effects. Management 23 Science, 63(11), 3944-3960. Zhou, J., & Chen, Y. J. (2015). Key leaders in social networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 157, 212-235. Zhou, J., & Chen, Y. J. (2017). Optimal pricing with sequential consumption in networks. Operations Research, forthcoming. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3140322. 24 By following the three solution steps mentioned in Section 3.1, the result of Step 1, namely, the specific g x . Similarly, the result of Step 2 is ba expression of Equation (4), is α ] [ 1  p   x bb ] [ b a b b Appendix A. (Proof of Result 1). a x    a β   aa g  g A g ab b ba  diag Next, substituting ax into    1  b β ) g A g ( ab b ba   bx , we obtain g  x where B a se :    a β   aa g  g A g ab b ba  diag α a  a p  g A α ( ab b b  p b ) .  ) b  g A g ( ab b ba ( b ba A g B 1  )   a se a )( α  a p  ( . Thus far, the optimal consumptions b b ba ab  a se A A g B g A α )(  ax and p , ) b bx b b of two categories are both expressed as the function of the offered price vector p , and then we further express them in matrix form: a b x x        M a b α α      a b p p    , where the matrix M takes the following form: M     B a se A g B ba b a se b ab a se b B g A a se ba b A A g B g A  ab .    b Lastly, Step 3 is conducted to achieve the solutions of the basic model. Specifically, the optimal consumption of the customers is the optimal offered pricing vector is p se x M M  se   1  [ α ] ( T 1   1 , c )   α M M M  [ 1   1  α ] ( T 1   1 , c ) and, accordingly, the largest profit gained by the monopolist is α (   se  Appendix B. (Proof of Lemma 1). 1 M M c ) [ T 1   2  T 1 ]  α (  1 c ) . Replacing g by 'g , the consumer's utility function in the simultaneous-move game is u x ( i i ; x  i , p i )  x  i i  1 2 x 2  i i   N j 1  g x x ij i ' j  p x i i . According to Result 2 shown in Section 3.3, we immediately obtain the expressions of the optimal siB is a consumption vector and the optimal price vector by replacing g with 'g , respectively. Thus, further expressed as ( ') siB g with the following formula: a a    β B g ( ') a si   25 aa g '  g A g ab b ba  1   , bA . seB , it a because the matrix transformation does not change abg , bag , bbg as well as the corresponding Moreover, according to the condition that 'aag = aa g immediately holds that diag g A g b ab ( ba ) and the expression of B g ( ') a si  B g , ( ) a se where seB is highlighted as the function of the matrix g . Next, the above Equation guarantees that a M g A g , ( ') ( ) where the matrix M and A are highlighted as the function of g and 'g , respectively. Thus, by recalling the expressions of sex , sep , six , sip , si and se , Lemma 1 holds. Appendix C. (Proof of Result 3). The part kt has no followers, so their decisions are not affected by the followers. As a result, the 1kt  has the remains unchanged; specifically, . Then, the part t t T  k k kt t t k k g g transformed matrix of follower part kt and therefore Lemma 1 guarantees that   g g t 1  t 1  1  1  t k k k t k T diag t k t 1  k ( g A g t k T t t k k 1  ) , which accords with Result 1 when only two categories exist. Next, when the part 2kt  is considered, it has two parts of followers: g t ( T kt . Then, the combined two parts' new influence matrix k 1  kt and t t   )( t k 1  k 1kt  , which have an ) can be reached as k influence on below  t k )( t k 1   t k ) k 1  g t ( T  t 1  g t k T g t t k k T    k 1  1  k t 1  g t k T g t t k k T     t 1  g t k T g t t k k    k 1  1  t k 1  k t t k k t g g    , where only the part t 1  k 1  g t k T is different from the original g ( t  t k )( t k 1   t k ) k 1  . Accordingly, once the two parts are considered together, Lemma 1 is also useful for achieving the transformed t k t 2 k  2 g : t  2 k  2 g t k T  t g t k  2 k  2  diag ( g t ( t  t k ) k 1  k  2 A t k T  t k 1  g ( t  t k ) t k  2 k 1  ) . Repeating the above process, we can achieve the transformed t tg j j (1    ) by considering the kt as one whole part. Note that the whole part's influence matrix has been has been achieved in the above processes. As a ) A 1    g ( , where t t j j i it t T diag ) t i k i i  t i k i t i k i t i k i   g g g g k 1    1    1    ) (  ) ( ( ) t t j j j j j j 1    3 j k j t t j T  T followers 1jt  , transformed as 2jt  ,  , g t i k i 1    (  T )(  j j result, Lemma 1 guarantees . In all, Result 3 holds. Appendix D. (Proof of Lemma 2). We first prove this lemma when all the customers are only divided into two categories: leaders and 26 followers. In this case, it first holds that   β    1  ' T g g '  2       β     1 T g g  2       β    1  T g g  2    ' T g g '  2     T g g  2      β 1  , g ' ' T g  2    and then, according to the relationship between g and 'g , we have    is an ( g ' T ' g  2  T g g  2 N m  )  ( N m  g A g ab b ba  diag     0 ( ,     ) N m N m ) (    matrix. Next, by recalling Assumption 1, all the elements are    ) where 0 ( N m N m ) (    ) not less than 0 in the following three matrixes:   β    1  T g g  2    , diag     g A g ab b ba 0 ( As a result, it immediately holds that , and     )   β     1 . ' T g g '  2    N m N m ) (         β  1 g ' ' T g  2       β    1  . T g g  2    Thus, note that no matter how many categories are contained in the customer sequence, the above result holds for any two divisions contained in sub-matrixes. In all, Lemma 2 holds. Appendix E. (Proof of Lemma 4) According to Definition 1, we immediately achieve the following equation: value t T 1  ( j )  α 1 c  2 T               g T 1  j ( )   β T j ( ) g  T 1  2 1         β     g T 1  j ( 1)  T j ( 1)  g  T 1  2 1             α 1 c  2     α 1 c  2    T          β g T 1  j ( 1)  T j ( 1)  g  T 1  2 1          g T 1  j ( ) T j ( ) g  T 1  2  g T 1  j ( 1)  T j ( 1)  g  T 1  2     g T 1  j ( )   β T j ( ) g  T 1  2 1      α 1 c   ,  2     Next, we add an isolated node into the given customer sequence T , and therefore we also obtain a new customer sequence denoted as 1 'T with k+1 elements. Note that the added node is isolated so that the new formed influence matrix any i j ,   , and {1,2, n , } 'g has the following expressions: g  n ( 1)( 1) ' 0   . n g ij ' g ij , i ng   and ( 1) ' 0 g  n ( 1) j ' 0  for Thus, recalling Result 3 proven above, we immediately achieve the following two results: (i) All the elements in g are no less than g ) ' for any T 1 (  j T 1 (  j ) j  {1, 2,  , which is denoted as k , } , and therefore it holds that g  2   g j ( ) T  β 1     T T  1 j ( ) 1      g T 1  j ( )  g T 1  ( ) ' j    β     27 g T  1 j ( ) ' T T  1 j ( ) g '  2  1 ;     (ii) The series of equations provided in Equation (22) guarantee that g ' T g g g T T T 1  j ( ) T 1  j ( ) T 1  j ( ) T 1  j ( ) T 1  ( j 1)  T 1  ( j 1)  g  2  g  2  g '  2 T 1   ' T T 1  ( j 1)  ( j 1)  g '  2  0 ( n n 1) (    1) . By considering the above results together, we further obtain value t T 1  ( j )  value t T  ( j ') 1 . Lastly, because the added node is isolated, it does not change the original result under the given customer sequence T . As a result, value t T ( j )   1 value t T ( j ) holds. Appendix F. (Proof of Property 1). Without loss of generality, a line network contains n customers, and their IDs are 1 to n, which also reflects their sequence orders, as displayed in Fig. 2. Given  and , when a newcomer n+1 is added into the line network, we next calculate how much value is increased of the existing n leading customers. For any j   , we denote {1,2, n , } value t ( )j   value t T 1 ( j )  value t T . Thus, according to Equation (22) in ( ) j Result 3 and the fact that the line network structure can be expressed as a tridiagonal matrix, we can achieve the following relations:  value t ( )j which implies that when k   , n , } {2, ∝ ( j   n 2 ) , value t (  k value t  (  k 1 ) ) ∝. Thus, the two rules hold under the line network structure and the given precondition. 28
1812.11669	3	1812	2019-01-11T02:12:57	Optimal Insurance with Limited Commitment in a Finite Horizon	[ "econ.TH" ]	We study a finite horizon optimal contracting problem of a risk-neutral principal and a risk-averse agent who receives a stochastic income stream when the agent is unable to make commitments. The problem involves an infinite number of constraints at each time and each state of the world. Miao and Zhang (2015) have developed a dual approach to the problem by considering a Lagrangian and derived a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation in an infinite horizon. We consider a similar Lagrangian in a finite horizon, but transform the dual problem into an infinite series of optimal stopping problems. For each optimal stopping problem we provide an analytic solution by providing an integral equation representation for the free boundary. We provide a verification theorem that the value function of the original principal's problem is the Legender-Fenchel transform of the integral of the value functions of the optimal stopping problems. We also provide some numerical simulation results of optimal contracting strategies	econ.TH	econ	Optimal Insurance with Limited Commitment in a Finite Horizon∗ Junkee Jeon † Hyeng Keun Koo‡ Kyunghyun Park§ January 14, 2019 Abstract We study a finite horizon optimal contracting problem with limited commitment. A risk-neutral principal enters into an insurance contract with a risk-averse agent who receives a stochastic income stream and is unable to make any commitment. This problem involves an infinite number of constraints at all times and at each state of the world. Miao and Zhang (2015) have developed a dual approach to the problem by considering a Lagrangian and derived a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation in an infinite horizon. We consider a similar Lagrangian in a finite horizon, but transform the dual problem into an infinite series of optimal stopping problems. For each optimal stopping problem we provide an analytic solution by providing an integral equation representation for the free boundary. We provide a verification theorem that the value function of the original principal's problem is the Legender-Fenchel transform of the integral of the value functions of the optimal stopping problems. We also provide numerical simulations results of the optimal contracting strategies. Keywords : Optimal contract, Limited commitment, Principal-Agent problem, Opti- mal stopping problem, Variational inequality, Singular control problem ∗Junkee Jeon gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Grant No. NRF-2017R1C1B1001811). Hyeng Kuen Koo gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (Grant No. NRF-2016R1A2B4008240). Kyunghyun Park is supported by NRF Global Ph.D Fellowship (2016H1A2A1908911). †E-mail: [email protected] Department of Applied Mathematics, Kyung Hee University, Korea. ‡E-mail: [email protected] Department of Financial Engineering, Ajou University, Korea. §E-mail: [email protected] Department of Mathematical Sciences, Seoul National University, Ko- rea. 1 1 Introduction In this paper we investigate a contracting problem with limited commitment in continuous time. A risk-neutral principal enters into an insurance contract with a risk-averse agent who receives a stream of random income. The principal, typically a large institutional agent such as a government agency or a financial institution, is able to make firm commit- ment to keep the contract for reputational or for other reasons. However, the agent, who may be an individual or a small country, is not able to make such commitment. If both parties were able to make firm commitment, the contract would result in a classical out- come of full insurance, where the principal absorbs all the risk in the agent's income and provides a constant stream of income to the agent. In the limited commitment case, the full insurance outcome is not attainable and the principal provides only partial insurance to the agent. There has been intensive economic research on optimal contract s with limited commit- ment (see e.g., Eaton and Gersovitz (1981), Thomas and Worrall (1988), Kehoe and Levine (1993)). Typically, the authors in the literature show that credit limits are used as a mechanism to enforce the contract and try to characterize the credit limits. They also show qualitative features of the contract. Recently, Grochulski and Zhang (2011) and Miao and Zhang (2015) proposed formulating the problem in continuous time and ob- taining a closed form characterization of the optimal contract. The closed-form outcome exhibits the following feature of the optimal contract: the optimal contract starts with a payment much lower than in the full commitment case and ratchets up whenever the income process hits a new high level. They also show that the contract outcome can be en- forced by providing unlimited insurance through futures contracts and optimal imposing credit limits. We consider the continuous-time contracting problem with a finite contracting period. The infinite horizon models studied by Grochulski and Zhang (2011) and Miao and Zhang (2015) do not capture an important feature of real-world contracts: contracts mostly have finite maturity dates. This is the motivation of our paper. We use the dual approach which allows us to use the Lagrangian method to solve the optimization problem. To apply th is approach, we need to transform an infinite number of constraints into one constraint. We utilize a method proposed by He and Pagés (1993) or Miao and Zhang (2015). We construct the Lagrangian and define the dual problem by using the state variable , i.e., which is the agent's income process, and a costate variable, i.e., the cumulative Lagrange multiplier process arising from the dynamic participation constraints. We solve the dual problem by transforming the problem into a series of optimal stopping problems. The optimal stopping problems are, in a formal sense, equiv- alent to those of early exercise of American options. Then, we can apply well-developed techniques to the latter contracting problem. In particular, we apply the integral repre- sentation of an American option value (see e.g. Kim (1990), Jacksa (1991), Carr et al. (1992), Detemple (2005)) and derive the optimal contract in analytic form. To obtain 2 a concrete solution, we apply the recursive integration method proposed by Huang et al. (1996) to solve numerically the integral equation. Contributions. Our contributions are as follows. First, we provide an analytic solution to the optimal contracting problem with limited commitment with a finite contracting period. Second, we make a technical contribution, providing a connection between the contracting problem and the irreversible investment problem involving real options stud- ied by Dixit and Pindyck (1994). Miao and Zhang (2015) establish the duality theorem and provide a dynamic programming characterization of the dual problem. However, it is difficult to apply their method to the problem with a finite period, since one has to consider a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman(HJB) equation with a gradient constraint involving three variables : time, income, and the agent's continuation value. Moreover, it is not easy to find a solution to the HJB equation. We overcome th is difficulty by considering a transformed problem, which is similar in its formal structure to an irreversible incremen- tal problem and equivalent to an infinite series of optimal stopping problems, so that it essentially becomes a single optimal stopping problem in our model. Related literature. In addition to the research mentioned above, there is extensive litera- ture on the contracting problem with limited commitment. Kehoe and Levine (1993) and Alvarez and Jermann (2000) investigate asset pricing based on the model with limited commitment. Zhang (2013) provides a solution to a long-term contracting problem in dis- crete time using a stopping-time approach. Bolton et al. (2016) shows that there is equiva- lence between the household problem and the contracting problem. Ai and Hartman-Glaser (2014), Ai and Li (2015), Ai et al. (2016), and Bolton et al. (2016) study optimal con- tracting between investors and an entrepreneur in a continuous-time model. Our paper, however, is different from the papers in the literature in the following aspects. First, the contract maturity is finite in our continuous-time model, whereas most papers con- sider either discrete-time long-horizon or continuous-time infinite-horizon models. Second, most authors use dynamic programming, and Miao and Zhang (2015) use in particular the dual approach, whereas we also use the dual approach as well as transform ing the original problem into optimal stopping problems. The duality approach has been used to study continuous-time portfolio selection problems (see e.g., Cox and Huang (1989), Karatzas et al. (1987)). Jeon et al. (2018) also apply the dual approach and the trans- formation to study an optimal consumption and portfolio selection problem in which an economic agent does not tolerate a decline in standard of living. Organization. The rest of paper is organized as follows. Section 2 explains the model of the optimal contracting problem with limited commitment in a finite-horizon framework. In Section 3, we state our optimization problem. By constructing the Lagrangian of the optimization problem, we define the dual problem. In Section 4, we analyse the variational inequality arising from the dual problem. Section 5 establishes the duality theorem and 3 provides the analytic representation of the optimal strategies. In Section 6, we provide numerical simulation results. In Section 7 we draw conclusions. 2 Economic model We extend a contracting model with limited commitment in a continuous-time framework studied in Grochulski and Zhang (2011), and Miao and Zhang (2015). The crucial differ- ence between the existing models and ours is that our model is set up in the finite horizon to study how the horizon affect s the contract. The agent receives an income stream Yt which is an Ft-adapted process. We consider the following geometric Brownian motion for the income process: dYt = µYtdt + σYtdBt, Y0 = y, where µ > 0, σ > 0 is constant and {Bt}T lying probability space (Ω,F , P) and {Ft}T filtration generated by the standard Brownian motion {Bt}T cess Y is publicly observable by both the principal and the agent. t=0 is a standard Brownian motion on the under- t=0 is the augmentation under P of the natural t=0. The agent's income pro- The agent is risk-averse with subject discount rate ρ > 0. The contract horizon is [0, T ]. At time 0, the principal offers a contract (C, T ) to the agent. Then the instantaneous payment or consumption of the agent C = {Ct}T t=0 is a non-negative Ft-adapted process satisfying E"Z T 0 e−rtCtdt# < ∞. Note that the contract is dependent on the entire history of the Yt process in our model. We assume that the agent has no access to the financial market. The agent's utility at time 0 is defined by U a 0 (C) ≡ E"Z T 0 e−ρtu(Ct)dt# , where u(·) is a continuously differentiable, strictly concave, and strictly increasing func- tion. Thus, the agent's continuation utility at date t is given by U a t (C) ≡ Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)u(Cs)ds# , where Et[·] = E[· Ft] is the conditional expectation at time t on the filtration Ft. We assume that the principal can freely access the financial market with constant risk-free rate r > 0 and can derive utility according to U p(y, C) ≡ E"Z T 0 e−rt(Yt − Ct)dt# . Without loss of generality, we assume 0 < r ≤ ρ. This also means that the principal is more patient than or equally patient with the agent. 4 To obtain explicit solutions, we assume that the agent uses the the constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility function as a representative utility function. Assumption 1. u(c) ≡ c1−γ 1 − γ , γ > 0, γ 6= 1, (1) where γ is the agent's coefficient of relative risk aversion. The agent has a limited commitment. He/she can walk away from the contract and take an outside value at any time after signing the contract. The outside value (or autarky value) Ud at time t is given by Ud(t, Yt) ≡Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# = (Yt)1−γ 1 − γ 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ , where ρ is defined by ρ ≡ ρ − (1 − γ)µ + 1 2 γ(1 − γ)σ2. We make the following assumption to ensure a finite outside value for sufficiently large T . Assumption 2. ρ > 0. To ensure that the agent does not walk away, we impose the following dynamic par- ticipation constraint: U a t (C) ≥ Ud(t, Yt), ∀t ∈ [0, T ]. We also impose the promise keeping constraint (or individual rationality constraint): where w0 is an initial promised value to the agent. w0 = U a 0 (C), (2) (3) Assumption 3. We assume that the initial promised value w satisfies the following inequality: Lastly, the continuation utility of the principal at date t is defined by w ≥ Ud(0, y). U p t (Y, C) ≡ Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# . We call a consumption plan {Cs}T tions hold. s=t enforceable at time t ∈ [0, T ] if the following condi- (i) (Integrability condition) Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)Csds# < ∞. 5 (4) (ii) (Participation constraint) U a s (C) ≥ Ud(s, Ys), ∀s ∈ [t, T ]. Let Γt(y, w) be the set of all enforceable consumption plans at time t. For some technical aspects, we make the following assumption: Assumption 4. r ≡ r − µ > 0, K ≡ r + ρ − r γ > 0, and µ > σ2 2 . (5) (6) 3 Optimization Problem 3.1 First-Best Allocation We first consider the first-best allocation contracting problem without participation con- straint (2) as the first-best benchmark. We use the agent's continuation value wt ≡ U a t (C) as a state variable. Problem 1 (First-Best Problem). For given wt = w, Yt = y, the principal's problem is to maximize V F B(t, y, w) = sup Γ′t(y,w) U p t (y, C), where Γ′ condition (4). t(y, w) is the set of all consumption plans {Cs}T s=t satisfying the integrability Note that the actual principal's problem for first-best case is to find V F B(0, y, w) at t = 0. However, the value function of Problem 1 is well-defined for any t > 0 by the dynamic programming principle (Bellman (1954)) since the principal fully commits to the contract until T . For Lagrangian multiplier λ∗ > 0, let us consider the following Lagrangian for the first-best case: LF B ≡ Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# + λ∗ Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)u(Cs)ds# − w! . Define the convex dual function of u as follows u(z) ≡ max c>0 {zu(c) − c} , for z > 0. In the case of the CRRA utility function, the dual function is derived as follows: Here, the first-best consumption is given by u(z) = 1 γ . z γ 1 − γ C F B s = (u′)−1(cid:16)e(ρ−r)(s−t)/λ∗(cid:17) , s ∈ [t, T ]. 6 (7) (8) (9) From Lagrangian LF B, we can define the dual value function V F B(t, λ∗, y) as follows: V F B(t, λ∗, y) = Et"Z T t Then, we can deduce the following duality-relationship: e−r(s−t)u(cid:16)e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ∗(cid:17) ds# + Et"Z T λ∗>0(cid:16) V F B(t, λ∗, y) − wλ∗(cid:17) . t V F B(t, y, w) = inf e−r(s−t)Ysds# . By a first-order condition, we can obtain w = 1 − e−K(T −t) K 1 1 − γ (λ∗) 1 γ −1. From (9), s =e− (ρ−r) C F B γ (s−t)(cid:18) K(1 − γ)w 1 − e−K(T −t)(cid:19) 1 1−γ , s ∈ [t, T ]. (10) For the first-best consumption C F B, the following equality holds: U a 0 (C F B) = w. This means that the risk-neutral principal bears all uncertainty and fully insures the risk-averse agents. Since 0 < r ≤ ρ, we can easily confirm that the first-best consumption process C F B is non-increasing function over time. 3.2 Limited Commitment We now write down the optimal contract problem with limited commitment between the principal and the agent. Problem 2 (Primal problem). Given wt = w and Yt = y, we consider the following maximization problem: V (t, y, w) ≡ sup C∈Γt(y,w) U p t (y, C). To obtain the solution of Problem 2, we will construct a Lagrangian for Problem 2. The key is to write the part of the Lagrangian corresponding to the participation constraint (5), which should hold at every s ∈ [t, T ] and thus is comprised of infinite individual constraints. By utilizing the similar method proposed by He and Pagés (1993), Miao and Zhang (2015) wrote an infinite number of constraints as an integral of the constraints. We write down the Lagrangian as follows: L ≡Et"Z T +Et"Z T t t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# + λ Et"Z T e−r(s−t)ηs Z T e−ρ(ξ−s)(u(Cξ) − u(Yξ))dξ! ds# , e−ρ(s−t)u(Cs)ds# − w! s t (11) 7 where λ > 0 is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the promise-keeping constraint (3) at each time t ≥ 0 and e−r(s−t)ηs ≥ 0 is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the participation constraint (2) at each time s ∈ [t, T ]. Using integration by parts, the third term of right-hand side in (11) can be given as follows: t t t s s e−ρ(ξ−s)(u(Cξ) − u(Yξ))dξ! ds# e−ρ(ξ−t)(u(Cξ) − u(Yξ))dξ! ds# e−ρ(ξ−s)(u(Cξ) − u(Yξ))dξ! ds# Et"Z T e−r(s−t)ηs Z T =Et"Z T e−ρ(s−t) · e(ρ−r)(s−t)ηs Z T =Et"Z T e(ρ−r)(ξ−t)ηξdξ(cid:19) Z T d(cid:18)Z s =Et"Z T e(ρ−r)(ξ−t)ηξdξ(cid:19) e−ρ(s−t)(u(Cs) − u(Ys))ds# . t (cid:18)Z s L =Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# + λEt"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# +Et"Z T t (cid:18)Z s e(ρ−r)(ξ−t)ηξdξ + λ(cid:19) e−ρ(s−t)(u(Cs) − u(Ys))ds# − λw. s t t t t t Plugging th e equation (12) into the Lagrangian (11), we obtain We define a costate process {Xs}T pliers, s=t as the cumulative amounts of the Lagrangian multi- e(ρ−r)(ξ−t)ηξdξ + λ, Xt = λ. (14) Xs ≡Z s t (12) (13) (15) (16) This process is non-decreasing, continuous, and satisfies Then we can write down L =Et"Z T +Et"Z T t t e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# dXs = e(ρ−r)(s−t)ηsds, s ∈ [t, T ]. t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# + λEt"Z T Xse−ρ(s−t)(u(Cs) − u(Ys))ds# − λw. Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# ≤ sup {Ct} t L. For every enforceable consumption plan {Cs}T s=t, we can deduce that To derive the dual problem, we first choose the consumption at each time to obtain the maximum of the Lagrangian (15), which takes the following form: L(X) = sup {Ct}(Et"Z T + Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(cid:16)e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Cs) − Cs(cid:17)ds# e−r(s−t)Ys − e−ρ(s−t)Xsu(Ys)ds# + λEt"Z T t t t e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# − λw) . (17) 8 By the first-order condition for a consumption plan {Cs}T sumption {C∗ s}T C∗ s=t is given as: s = (u′)−1(cid:18) e(ρ−r)(s−t) (cid:19) = (e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) Xs γ , 1 s=t in (17), the optimal con- s ∈ [t, T ]. (18) Then L(X) can be given by L(X) =Et"Z T +λEt"Z T t t e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Ys)(cid:17)ds# e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# − λw. (19) To ensure that the Lagrangian (19) is finite, we assume the following integrability condi- tions: t t t Let us define Et"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)Xsds# < ∞, Et"Z T e−r(s−t)u(Xse−(ρ−r)(s−t))ds# < ∞. J (t, λ, y, X) ≡Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Ys)(cid:17)ds# +λEt"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# . Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# ≤ e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# ≤ J (t, λ, y, X) − λw. By the definition of the Lagrangian L(X) and the function J defined in (21), [J (t, λ, y, X) − λw] , Then, it is clear that λ>0,X∈N D(λ) inf Et"Z T t t t (20) (21) where ND(λ) denotes the set of all positive non-decreasing, adaptable with respect to F , right-continuous processes X with left-limits (RCLL) and starting at Xt = λ, satisfying (20). Hence, the value function V (t, y, w), the maximized utility value of the principal, satisfies the following inequality: V (t, y, w) = sup C∈Γt(y,w) Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# ≤ inf λ>0,X∈N D(λ) [J (t, λ, y, X) − λw] . (22) We will show in Theorem 5.1 that the maximized value is indeed equal to the right-hand side of the inequality in (22) with the infimum being replaced by the minimum, i.e., V (t, y, w) = min λ>0,X∈N D(λ) [J (t, λ, y, X) − λw] = min λ>0(cid:20) min X∈N D(λ) J (t, λ, y, X) − λw(cid:21) . (23) 9 That is, we should choose the process X to minimize L(X): inf X∈N D(λ) L(X). (24) We now study the minimization problem inside the bracket of the right-hand side of the last equality in (23), which we will call as the dual problem of Problem 2. Problem 3 (Dual problem). Given λ > 0, consider the minimization problem: J(t, λ, y) = inf X∈N D(λ)J (t, λ, y, X). (25) To obtain the optimal costate process {X ∗ s=t, we transform Problem 3 to the optimal stopping problem. This transformation is due to the existence of one-to-one correspon- dence between the set of all costate processes {Xs}T s=t ∈ ND(λ) and the set of all infinite series of F -stopping times {τ (x)}x≥λ taking values in [t, T ] which is non-decreasing and left-continuous with right limits as a function of x. s}T The correspondence is given by τ (x) = inf{s ≥ t Xs ≥ x} ∧ T. The problem of choosing a non-decreasing process {Xs}T s=t is similar to an irreversible incremental investment problem studied by Pindyck (1988) and Dixit and Pindyck (1994). They consider the capacity expansion decision of a firm as a series of optimal stopping problems: for each level of capacity, there is a corresponding stopping problem where the firm chooses the optimal time to expand its capacity to an appropriate level. Based on this idea, we transform Problem 3 into a series of optimal stopping problems in the following lemma. Lemma 3.1. We can write the dual value function as follows: J(t, λ, y) = −y1−γZ ∞ λ sup τ (x)∈[t,T ] EQ t he− ρ(τ (x)−t)h(τ (x), xHτ (x))i! dx + J0(t, λ, y), (26) where Hs ≡ e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Y −γ s , 1 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ 1 − e−K(T −t) K z − 1 γ −1(cid:19) , (27) h(t, z) ≡ J0(t, λ, y) ≡ γ 1 − γ 1 − e−K(T −t) 1 γ + λ K 1 − e−r(T −t) r y. and the measure Q is defined in the proof. EQ[·] is the expectation with respect to measure Q. The corresponding standard Brownian motion BQ s is defined as BQ s ≡ Bs − (1 − γ)σs, s ∈ [t, T ]. Proof. Define a function f as follows f (x) = e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x · u(Ys)(cid:17) . 10 By assigning (1) and (8) to f , f (x) = e−r(s−t)(cid:18) γ 1 − γ (e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x) 1 γ + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x Y 1−γ s (cid:19) 1 1 − γ and Then, f ′(x) = e−ρ(s−t) 1 − γ (cid:16)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x) 1 γ −1 − Y 1−γ s (cid:17) . (28) (29) e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# (30) e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# f (λ)ds# + λEt"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# t J(t, λ, y) inf Xs∈N D(λ) inf Xs∈N D(λ) inf Xs∈N D(λ) = = = = t t t t λ Xt f (Xs)ds# + λEt"Z T t Z Xs t (cid:18)Z ∞ t (cid:18)Z ∞ e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# f ′(x)dx + f (Xt)! ds# + λEt"Z T f ′(x) · 1{x≤Xs}dx(cid:19) ds# + Et"Z T f ′(x) · 1{x≤Xs}dx(cid:19) ds# + λEt"Z T Et"Z T Et"Z T Et"Z T Et"Z T e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ · u(Ys)(cid:17) ds# Et"Z T t (cid:18)Z ∞ Et"Z ∞ λ Z T Et"Z T f ′(x) · 1{w≤Xs}dx(cid:19) ds# + Et"Z T f ′(x) · 1{s>τ (x)}ds! dx# + Et"Z T f ′(x)ds#! dx + Et"Z T τ (x) t t λ λ t t t inf Xs∈N D(λ) +Et"Z T t = inf Xs∈N D(λ) = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] λ inf =Z ∞ τ (x)∈[t,T ] e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ) + Ys(cid:17) ds# e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ) + Ys(cid:17) ds# e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ) + Ys(cid:17) ds# . where a stopping time τ (x) is defined by τ (x) = inf {s ≥ tXs ≥ x} ∧ T, ∀x ≥ λ. (31) Note that Fubini's theorem implies that inf Xs∈N D(λ) Et"Z T t (cid:18)Z ∞ λ f ′(x) · 1{x≤Xs}dx(cid:19) ds# = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] Et"Z ∞ λ Z T t f ′(x) · 1{s>τ (x)}ds! dx# . Define a exponential martingale process Z t each s ∈ [t, T ], s and corresponding probability measure Q for Z t s = exp(cid:26)− 1 2 (1 − γ)2σ2(s − t) + (1 − γ)σ(Bs − Bt)(cid:27) , and dQ dP = Z t s, respectively. Girsanov's theorem implies that dBQ s = dBs − (1 − γ)σds, s ∈ [t, T ] 11 is a standard Brownian motion under the measure Q. Since Ys = Yte(µ− 1 2 σ2)(s−t)+σ(Bs−Bt) and Yt = y, let us define Y t 2 σ2)(s−t)+σ(Bs−Bt). s ≡ e(µ− 1 By using (29), the first term of the last equation in (30) can be derived as follows. inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] τ (x) Et"Z T Et"Z T τ (x) f ′(x)ds# 1 − γ (cid:16)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x) e−ρ(s−t) 1 γ −1 − Y 1−γ s (cid:17) ds# 1 1 − γ y1−γ 1 − γ y1−γ 1 − γ y1−γ 1 − γ y1−γ 1 − γ s s 1 γ τ (x) τ (x) e−ρ(s−τ (x))(Y τ (x) Et"e−ρ(τ (x)−t)Eτ (x)"Z T Et e−ρ(τ (x)−t)(Y t Et e− ρ(τ (x)−t)Z t t  e− ρ(τ (x)−t)EQ t "e− ρ(τ (x)−t)EQ e−ρ(s−τ (x))(cid:16)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x) τ (x))1−γ Eτ (x) Z T τ (x)Eτ (x) Z T τ (x) e− ρ(s−τ (x)) Z T τ (x)"Z T τ (x)(cid:18)e− ρ(s−τ (x)) (xHs) (cid:18) e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x −1 − Y 1−γ (cid:17) ds##  ds − 1  )1−γ (cid:18) e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x (cid:19)   − 1  ds  s  (cid:18) e−(ρ−r)(s−t)x (cid:19)   − 1   ds   −1 · e−(ρ−r)(s−τ (x))(cid:16) 1 −1(cid:17)(Y τ (x) e− ρ(s−τ (x))Z τ (x) )γ−1 (Ys)γ (Ys)γ (Ys)γ (cid:19) EQ EQ τ (x) τ (x) −1 −1 1 γ −1 1 γ 1 γ 1 γ γ s (32) − e− ρ(s−τ (x))(cid:17) dsii = inf τ (x)∈[t,T ] y1−γ 1 − γ EQ t (cid:20)e− ρ(τ (x)−t)(cid:18) 1 − e−K(T −τ (x)) K (xHτ (x)) 1 γ −1 − 1 − e− ρ(T −τ (x)) ρ (cid:19)(cid:21) . Remark 3.1. Under the measure Q, dYs = (µ + (1 − γ)σ2)Ysds + σYsdBQ s , dHs = (r − ρ + σ2γ2)Hsds − γσHsdBQ s . (33) The process Hs can be easily derived by Itô's lemma. We will use this process to prove variational inequality(VI) later. The other term of last equation in (30) can be directly derived. Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)λ) + Ys(cid:17) ds# = γ 1 − γ 1 − e−K(T −t) K 1 γ + λ 1 − e−r(T −t) r y. (34) By (32) and (34), J(t, λ, y) γ + K τ (x)∈[t,T ] y1−γ 1 − γ =Z ∞ λ (cid:18) inf 1 − γ (cid:18) 1 − e−K(T −t) λ sup = − y1−γZ ∞ 1 − γ (cid:18) 1 − e−K(T −t) K + γ τ (x)∈[t,T ] EQ t (cid:20)e− ρ(τ (x)−t)(cid:18) 1 − e−K(T −τ (x)) K 1 − e−r(T −t) 1 γ + λ EQ t (cid:20)e− ρ(τ (x)−t) 1 − e−r(T −t) 1 γ + λ r r 1 y(cid:19) 1 − γ (cid:18) 1 − e− ρ(T −τ (x)) y(cid:19). ρ (xHτ (x)) 1 γ −1 − 1 − e− ρ(T −τ (x)) ρ (cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:19) dx − 1 − e−K(T −τ (x)) K (xHτ (x)) 1 γ −1(cid:19)(cid:21)! dx (35) 12 This ends the proof of Lemma 3.1. (cid:3) In Lemma 3.1, the dual problem can be solved by converting it to the infinite series of optimal stopping time problems. Since the underlying process (Hs)T s=t has an exponen- tial form, however, the multiplicative factor x can be absorbed into the initial condition problem. Thus, the problems can be combined into a single problem, as shown below. Problem 4 (Optimal stopping problem). We consider the following optimal stopping problem: g(t, z) = sup τ ∈S(t,T ) where S(t, T ) denotes the set of all stopping times of the filtration F taking values in [t, T ], and EQhe− ρ(τ −t)h(τ,Hτ )(cid:12)(cid:12) Ht = zi , γ −1(cid:19) 1 − e−K(T −t) − K 1 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ 1 z h(t, z) = and (Hs)s≥t satisfies the following stochastic diffusion process: dHs = (r − ρ + σ2γ2)Hsds − γσHsdBQ s . Notice that Problem 4 is equivalent to that of finding the optimal exercise time of an American option written on the underlying process {Hs}T s=t with payoff equal to h(τ,Hτ ) at the time of exercise time τ . The exercise time is characterized as the first time for the underlying process to hit the early exercise boundary(or free boundary), and thus the problem is to derive the early exercise boundary. Kim (1990), Carr et al. (1992), and Detemple (2005) provide an integral equation representation of the American option value from which one can derive a functional equation for the early exercise boundary. According to the standard technique for the optimal stopping problem, g(T, z) can be derived from the following variational inequality(VI). (See Chapter 2 of Karatzas and Shreve (1998) or Yang and Koo (2018)):  −∂tg − Lg = 0, −∂tg − Lg ≥ 0, g(T, z) = h(T, z), if g(t, z) > h(t, z) and (t, z) ∈ MT , if g(t, z) = h(t, z) and (t, z) ∈ MT , ∀ z ∈ (0, +∞), (36) where MT = [0, T ) × (0, +∞) and the operator L is generated by the process Hs: γ2σ2 2 L = z2∂zz + (r − ρ + σ2γ2)z∂z − ρ. 4 Analysis of variational inequality arising from Prob- lem 4 In this section we provide a complete self-contained derivation of the solution to VI (36) arising from Problem 4 by borrowing the ideas and proofs in Yang and Koo (2018). 13  For convenience of proof, we substitute the above VI (36) for the following to make the lower obstacle 0. Q(t, z) = g(t, z) − h(t, z). Then, the (36) can be converted to −∂tQ − LQ = −∂tQ − LQ ≥ Q(T, z) = 0, 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , 1 ∀ z ∈ (0, +∞). if Q(t, z) > 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , if Q(t, z) = 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , (37) Now, we will prove the existence and uniqueness of W 1,2 describe properties of the solution. p,loc solution (p ≥ 1) to VI (37) and p,loc(MT ) ∩ C(gMT ) for any p ≥ 1 and ∂zQ ∈ C(gMT ), where fMT = [0, T ] × Lemma 4.1. VI (37) has a unique strong solution Q satisfying the following properties: 1. Q ∈ W 1,2 (0, +∞). 2. ∂zQ ≥ 0 a.e. in gMT and ∂tQ ≤ 0 a.e. in gMT . Proof. 1. To use the Theorem of Friedman (1975), replace the PDE operator L with a non-degenerate parabolic equation. Define ζ = log z, ¯Q(t, ζ) = Q(t, z). Then ¯Q(t, ζ) satisfies  where −∂t ¯Q − ¯L ¯Q = −∂t ¯Q − ¯L ¯Q ≥ ¯Q(T, ζ) = 0, 1 1 − γ(cid:16)eζ( 1 1 − γ(cid:16)eζ( 1 γ −1) − 1(cid:17) , γ −1) − 1(cid:17) , 1 ∀ ζ ∈ (0, +∞). if ¯Q(t, ζ) > 0 and (t, eζ) ∈ MT if ¯Q(t, ζ) = 0 and (t, eζ) ∈ MT (38) ¯L = γ2σ2 2 ∂ζζ + (r − ρ + 1 σ2γ2 )∂ζ − ρ. 2 Since the inhomogeneous term ' 1 − γ(cid:16)eζ( 1 minal value '0' are all smooth functions, we can easily show that VI(38) has a unique solution satisfying ¯Q ∈ W 1,2 Friedman (1975)). γ −1) − 1(cid:17)', the lower obstacle '0' and the ter- p,loc(MT ) ∩ C(gMT ) for any p ≥ 1 and ∂ζ ¯Q ∈ C(gMT )(See 2. Let us denote eQ(t, z) = Q(t, ηz) for any η > 1. Then eQ satisfies following Variational 1 − γ(cid:16)(ηz) −∂teQ − LeQ = 1 − γ(cid:16)(ηz) −∂teQ − LeQ ≥ eQ(T, z) = 0 ∀ z ∈ (0, +∞). if eQ(t, z) > 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , if eQ(t, z) = 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) ,  Inequality: (39) 1 1 1 1 14 1 1 1  1 1 − γ(cid:16)z for ∀ γ > 0(γ 6= 1). γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) > 1 − γ(cid:16)(ηz) For any η > 1, we can easily check that the inhomogeneous term of eQ is greater than Q: In addition, since the terminal value of Q and eQ are the same, the comparison theory for VI implies that eQ(t, z) = Q(t, ηz) ≥ Q(t, z) for any η > 1 and (t, z) ∈ MT . So we obtain ∂zQ ≥ 0 in MT . Define Q(t, z) = Q(t − δ, z) with δ > 0 being sufficiently small. Then Q follows: if Q(t, z) > 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , if Q(t, z) = 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 − γ(cid:16)z −∂t Q − L Q = −∂t Q − L Q ≥ Q(T, z) = 0 ∀ z ∈ (0, +∞). γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , (40) 1 1 1 1 Since Q(T, z)(= Q(T − δ, z)) ≥ Q(T, z) for any δ > 0, z > 0, the following can be deduced by the comparison theory for the same reason: Q(t, z) = Q(t − δ, z) ≤ Q(t, z). Therefore we can prove that ∂tQ ≤ 0, a.e. (cid:3) We can define two regions derived from the Variational Inequality (37): Ω1 = {(t, z) Q(t, z) = 0} , Ω2 = {(t, z) Q(t, z) > 0} . Since ∂zQ ≥ 0, we can define the free boundary z⋆(t) as follows: ∀t ∈ [0, T ). z⋆(t) = inf {z ≥ 0 Q(t, z) > 0} , The two regions can be defined according to the boundary as follows. Ω1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z⋆(t), t ∈ [0, T ]} , Ω2 = {(t, z) z > z⋆(t), t ∈ [0, T ]} . (41) (42) (43) Lemma 4.2. The free boundary z⋆ is smooth, i.e., z⋆(t) ∈ C[0, T ] ∩ C∞([0, T )). More- over, the solution Q ≡ 0 in Ω1, and Q ∈ C∞ ({(t, z) z ≥ z⋆(t), t ∈ [0, T ]}), and ∂tQ ∈ C(fMT ). in fMT . Moreover, the coefficient γ −1 − 1(cid:17) are all smooth. Therefore, the regularity results Proof. By Lemma 4.1, we obtain ∂tQ ≤ 0 a.e. functions in the operator L, the lower obstacle function, the terminal function, and the non-homogeneous term 1 in the lemma follow from Theorem 3.1 in Friedman (1975). 1−γ(cid:16)z (cid:3) 1 Consider the following function Q∞ as follow: 1 γ 1 K 1 α− (z∞) 1 γ −1−α−(cid:19) zα− + (cid:18)− 0, Q∞(t, z) = where 1 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 K z 1 γ −1 − 1 ρ(cid:19) , if (t, z) ∈ Ω∞ 2 , if (t, z) ∈ Ω∞ 1 , (44) Ω∞ 1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} , Ω∞ 2 = {(t, z) z > z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} (45) 15 and z∞ =(cid:18) ρ(α−γ + γ − 1) Kα−γ γ−1 (cid:19) γ . (46) α+ and α− are the positive and negative root of the following quadratic equation f (α) = 0, respectively: f (α) = γ2σ2 2 α2 + (r − ρ + γ2σ2 2 )α − ρ = 0. (47) It is easy to confirm that f (−1) = −r = µ − r < 0, and α− < −1. Lemma 4.3. The solution Q satisfy the following statements: 1. Q(t, z) ≡ 0 in Ω∞ 1 . 2. Q(t, z) > 0 in [0, T ) × (zT ,∞), where zT = 1. Proof. 1. It is easy to check that Q∞ ∈ W 1,2 p,loc(MT ) ∩ C(gMT ) for p ≥ 1. z∞(cid:19)α−+1− 1 γ! > 0, in Ω∞ 2 = {(t, z) z > z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} . Since α− < −1, we deduce = ∂z 1 z ∂Q∞ 1 γK γ −2 1 −(cid:18) z −∂tQ∞ − LQ∞ = 1 − γ(cid:16)z 0, We can see that Q∞ satisfies the following equality. 1 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , in Ω∞ in Ω∞ 2 = {(t, z) z > z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} , 1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} . (48) Prior to proving 1. of Lemma 4.3 , we can first show the following inequality: z∞ < zT ⇐⇒ (cid:18) ρ(α−γ + γ − 1) Kα−γ γ−1 (cid:19) γ < 1. (49) If 0 < γ < 1, the above inequality is equivalent to ρ(α−γ + γ − 1) < Kα−γ ⇐⇒ (ρ − K)γα− < ρ(1 − γ). By Assumption 4, ρ − K = (ρ − r)(cid:18)1 − 1 γ(cid:19) − (1 − γ)µ + γ(1 − γ) σ2 2 < 0. It is enough to show α− > ρ(1 − γ) γ(ρ − K) . 16 Since α− is negative root of quadratic equation f (α) = 0 in (47), we need to show f(cid:16) ρ(1−γ) γ( ρ−K)(cid:17) > 0. By simple calculations, γ(ρ − K)(cid:19) = f(cid:18) ρ(1 − γ) K ρσ2(1 − γ)2 2γ2(ρ − K)2 > 0. The following γ > 1 case is also the same as the previously proven case 0 < γ < 1 and thus is omitted here. By using (48) and the inequality z∞ < zT in (49), −∂tQ∞ − LQ∞ ≥ 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) ∀ (t, z) ∈ MT Note that ∂Q∞ in Ω2 and Q∞ satisfies the following VI: ∂z (t, z∞) = Q∞(t, z∞) = 0 and ∂Q∞ ∂z (t, z) > 0 in Ω2. Therefore Q∞(t, z) > 0  −∂tQ∞ − LQ∞ = −∂tQ∞ − LQ∞ ≥ Q∞(t, z) ≥ 0, 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , 1 ∀ (t, z) ∈ MT . By the comparison principle for VI, we have in Q∞ > 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , in Q∞ = 0 and (t, z) ∈ MT , (50) Q(t, z) ≤ Q∞(t, z), ∀ (t, z) in MT . So we can get the first result of this lemma Q = 0 in Ω∞ 1 . 0 ≤ Q(t, z) ≤ Q∞(t, z) ≤ 0, in Ω∞ 1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} . Furthermore, this means that Ω1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z⋆(t), t ∈ [0, T ]} ⊇ Ω∞ 1 = {(t, z) 0 < z ≤ z∞, t ∈ [0, T ]} . Thus, we obtain that z⋆(t) ≥ z∞ in [0, T ]. 2. Finally, let us prove the second property of this Lemma. VI (37) implies that Q = 0, − ∂tQ − LQ − 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) ≥ 0, in Ω1. This leads to Ω1 ⊆ [0, T ] × (0, zT ]. Hence, it is obvious that Ω2 = {(t, z) Q(t, z) > 0} ⊇ [0, T ) × (zT ,∞). Thus, Q(t, z) > 0 in [0, T ) × (zT ,∞). Moreover, z⋆(t) ≤ zT (= 1) in [0, T ]. This is the end of the lemma. (cid:3) Lemma 4.4. The free boundary z⋆(t), t ∈ [0, T ] is strictly increasing with the terminal point z⋆(T ) = lim t→T − z⋆(t) = zT . And z∞ < z⋆(t) < zT , ∀t ∈ [0, T ). 17 Proof. By Lemma 4.1, ∂zQ ≥ 0, ∂tQ ≤ 0 a.e. in MT , Q ∈ C(fMT ). For any fixed t0 ∈ [0, T ), 0 ≤ Q(t, z) ≤ Q(t, z⋆(t0)) ≤ Q(t0, z⋆(t0)) = 0, ∀t ∈ (t0, T ] and ∀z ∈ (0, z⋆(t0)]. By the definition of the free boundary z⋆(t), z⋆(t) ≥ z⋆(t0), 0 ≤ t0 ≤ t < T. The above inequality shows that z⋆(t) is just increasing function with respect to t. (We still need to show the strict increasing property of z⋆(t)). z⋆(t) exists. We know that z⋆(t) ≤ zT in Since z⋆(t) is increasing, the z⋆(T ) = lim t→T − ∀t ∈ [0, T ]. It is therefore sufficient to show that z⋆(T ) ≥ zT . Otherwise, there exists interval (z⋆(T ), zT ) such that [0, T ) × (z⋆(T ), zT ) ⊂ Ω2. So, we have shown that −∂tQ − LQ = Q(T, z) = 0,  1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , in Ω2 ∀ z ≥ z⋆(T ), Q(t, z⋆(t)) = 0 ∀ t ∈ [0, T ]. By using the above fact, we can deduce that at time T ∂tQ(T, z) = −LQ(T, z)− 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) = − 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) > 0 ∀ z ∈ (z⋆(T ), zT ). However, it is easy to see that the above inequality is inconsistent with the results of Lemma 4.1. Finally, we show that z⋆(t) is strictly increasing. Otherwise, there exists t1, t2 and z1 such that z⋆(t) = z1 for all t ∈ [t2, t1] where 0 ≤ t2 < t1 ≤ T and z1 ∈ [z∞, zT ]. Then, it is clear that Q(t, z) = 0 for all (t, z) ∈ [t2, t1] × (0, z1). Because of the continuity at the free boundary of ∂zQ, ∂zQ(t, z1) = 0 for all t ∈ [t2, t1]. Therefore, we obtain that ∂tQ(t, z1) = ∂z∂zQ(t, z1) = 0 for all t ∈ [t2, t1]. In domain [t2, t1) × (z1,∞), ∂tQ satisfies −∂t∂tQ − L∂tQ = 0, ∂tQ ≤ 0, ∀ t ∈ (t2, t1). ∂tQ(t, z1) = 0, in [t2, t1) × (z1,∞),  According to Hopf's boundary point lemma (See Liu (2015)), we obtain that ∂z(∂tQ) < 0, which contradicts the ∂z∂tQ(t, z1) = 0 in t ∈ [t2, t1]. So, the free boundary z⋆(t) is strictly increasing. Thus, We conclude that z∞ < z⋆(t) < zT for all t ∈ [0, T ) (cid:3) Lemma 4.5. For (t, z) ∈ MT , 0 ≤ ∂zQ(t, z) ≤ 1 γ · 1 − e−K(T −t) K 1 γ −2. z (51) 18 Proof. From VI (37), Q(t, z) satisfies 1 1 − γ(cid:16)z −∂tQ − LQ = Q(T, z) = 0, ∀ z ≥ z⋆(T ); 1 γ −1 − 1(cid:17) , in Ω2, Q(t, z⋆(t)) = 0, ∀ t ∈ [0, T ]. Since L(z∂zQ) = z∂z(LQ) and ∂zQ(t, z⋆(t)) = 0, we have −∂t(z∂zQ) − L(z∂zQ) = (z∂zQ)(T, z) = 0, ∀ z ≥ z⋆(T ); z 1 γ 1 γ −1, in Ω2, (z∂zQ)(t, z⋆(t)) = 0, ∀ t ∈ [0, T ].   Let us temporarily denote Q1(t, z) = 1 γ · 1 − e−K(T −t) K 1 γ −1. z Then, Q1(t, z) satisfies  1 γ 1 γ −1, z −∂tQ1 − LQ1 = Q1(T, z) = 0, ∀ z ≥ z⋆(T ); Q1(t, z⋆(t)) = in Ω2, 1 γ · 1 − e−K(T −t) K (z⋆(t)) 1 γ −1, ∀ t ∈ [0, T ]. By the comparison principle for PDEs(see Lieberman (1996)), From Lemma 4.1, we can conclude z∂zQ(t, z) ≤ Q1(t, z). 0 ≤ ∂zQ(t, z) ≤ 1 γ · 1 − e−K(T −t) K 1 γ −2. z We provide the integral equation representation of Q(t, z) in the following lemma. Lemma 4.6. In the region Ω2, the value function Q(t, z) has the following integral equation representation: (cid:3) t z 1 1 γ −1 Q(t, z) = 1 − γZ T 1 − γZ T log z + (r − ρ + 1 γσ√t − t e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)s − t, e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)d1(cid:18)s − t, z z z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds, log z + (r − ρ − 1 2 (γσ)2)t , dγ(t, z) = 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γσ√t γ (γσ)2)t , where d1(t, z) = and N (·) is a standard normal distribution function. Moreover, the free boundary z⋆(t) satisfies the following integral equation: 1 γ −1 (z⋆(t)) 1 − γ 1 1 − γZ T t t e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)s − t, Z T e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)d1(cid:18)s − t, z⋆(t) z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds. z⋆(t) z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds 0 = − 19 Proof. From Lemma 4.1, By applying Itó lemma to e− ρsQ(s.Hs) (see Krylov (1980)), By Lemma 4.5, t d(cid:0)e− ρsQ(s,Hs)(cid:1) =Z T Z T EQ"Z T 0 (cid:18)γσe− ρtHt ∂z(cid:19)2 ∂Q This implies that is a martingale under Q measure and Q ∈ W 1,2 p ≥ 1. t + LQ(cid:19) ds − γσZ T EQ"Z T 0 (cid:16)e− ρtHt t ∂s p,loc(MT ) ∩ C(gMT ), e− ρs(cid:18) ∂Q dt# ≤ γσZ T t "γσZ T e− ρsHs e− ρsHs σ2 K 2 ∂Q ∂z ∂Q ∂z t t s# = 0. dBQ dBQ s EQ e− ρsHs ∂Q ∂z dBQ s . (52) dt# < ∞. γ−1 γ (cid:17)2 (see Chapter 3 in Oksendal (2005)) By taking expectation to both-side of the equation (52), + LQ(cid:19) ds# Q(t, z) =EQ t ∂s t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)(cid:18) ∂Q + LQ(cid:19) 1{(s,Hs)∈Ω2}ds# + LQ(cid:19) 1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# γ − 1(cid:17) 1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# γ 1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# − 1−γ 1 1 − γ t t ∂s = − EQ t he− ρ(T −t)Q(T,HT )i − EQ t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)(cid:18) ∂Q = − EQ t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)(cid:18) ∂Q t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)(cid:16)Hs t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)Hs = exp(cid:26)− 1 1 − γ 1 1 − γ dP dQ EQ EQ 1 2 1−γ ∂s = = t t EQ 1 t 1−γ t + (1 − γ)σs, e− ρ(s−t)Hs for s ∈ [t, T ], (1 − γ)2σ2(s − t) − (1 − γ)σ(BQ γ 1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# e−K(s−t)1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# e−K(s−t)P(Hs ≥ z⋆(s))ds e−K(s−t)N log z⋆(s) + (r − ρ − 1 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γσ√s − t t "Z T γ −1Et"Z T γ −1Z T γ −1Z T z t t t 1 1 =z =z =z 20 Since and Bs = BQ EQ t t "Z T e− ρ(s−t)1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# . t )(cid:27) s − BQ γ (γσ)2)(s − t) ! ds. Similarly, Thus, Q(t, z) = − t EQ t "Z T =Z T =Z T e− ρ(s−t)1{Hs≥z⋆(s)}ds# e− ρ(s−t)Q(Hs ≥ z⋆(s))ds e− ρ(s−t)N log t t z z⋆(s) + (r − ρ + 1 γσ√s − t 2 (γσ)2)(s − t) ! ds. z z⋆(s) + (r − ρ − 1 γ (γσ)2)(s − t) 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γσ√s − t 2 (γσ)2)(s − t) ! ds. z z⋆(s) + (r − ρ + 1 γσ√s − t ! ds By the smooth-pasting condition (Lemma 4.2), t z 1 γ −1 1 − γZ T 1 − γZ T 1 t e−K(s−t)N log e− ρ(s−t)N log e−K(s−t)N log z⋆(t) 0 =(z⋆(t)) −Z T t 1 t γ −1Z T e− ρ(s−t)N log z⋆(t) z⋆(s) + (r − ρ − 1 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γσ√s − t γ (γσ)2)(s − t) z⋆(s) + (r − ρ + 1 γσ√s − t 2 (γσ)2)(s − t)  ds.  ds (cid:3) We will show that the value function Q(t, z) converges when the time-to-maturity goes to infinity. We will need the following lemma. Lemma 4.7. For arbitrary c > 0 and d ∈ R, 1 Z ∞ 0 e−cξN (dpξ)dξ = Proof. By integration by parts, d √d2 + 2c(cid:19) . Z ∞ 0 1 c e−cξN (dpξ)dξ =(cid:20)− Z ∞ 0 Therefore, 2c(cid:18)1 + e−cξN (dpξ)(cid:21)ξ=∞ x2(cid:27) dx = ξ=0 b2 exp(cid:26)−a2x2 − Z ∞ e−(c+ d2 0 2 )ξ 1 √ξ + d 2c√2πZ ∞ 0 e−cξ− d2 2 ξ 1 √ξ dξ. (53) √π 2a e−2ab. dξ = √π qc + d2 2 . (cid:3) By Abramowitz and Stegun (1972) (p.304, equation (7.4.33)), for any a, b ∈ R, We now provide the convergence of Q(t, z) in the following lemma. 21 Lemma 4.8. lim T −t→∞ Q(t, z) = Q∞(z) and lim T −t→∞ z⋆(t) = z∞, where Q∞(z) and z∞ are defined in (44) and (45), respectively. Proof. Letez⋆ define such thatez⋆(T − t) ≡ z⋆(t), then z⋆(t) = lim z∞ = lim T −t→∞ From the integral equation of z⋆ in Lemma 4.6 and T − t → ∞, γ (γσ)2 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γ−1 T −t→∞ez⋆(T − t). 0 = z∞ −Z ∞ 0 0 γσ e−KξN r − ρ − 1 γ Z ∞ e− ρξN(cid:18) r − ρ + 1 2 (γσ)2 pξ(cid:19) dξ. (cid:19) γ z∞ =(cid:18) ρ(α−γ + γ − 1) Kα−γ γσ γ−1 . pξ! dξ (54) By applying Lemma 4.7 and direct computation, we can get z∞ as follows: Consider the integral equation representation of Q(t, y) in Lemma 4.6, then Q(t, z) Q∞(z) ≡ lim T −t→∞ = lim T −t→∞ 0 0 z z z 1 1 γ −1 T −t→∞ 1 − γZ T −t 1 − γZ T −t e−KξN(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)ξ, e−KξN (cid:18) log z e− ρξN(cid:18)(cid:18) log z e−KξN(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)ξ, e− ρξN(cid:18)d1(cid:18)ξ, z∞(cid:19)(cid:19) dξ − γσ (cid:19) ξ− 1 γσ (cid:19) ξ− 1 ez⋆(T − t − ξ)(cid:19)(cid:19) dξ ez⋆(T − t − ξ)(cid:19)(cid:19) dξ 1 − γZ ∞ 2 + r − ρ − 1 2 +(cid:18) r − ρ + 1 γσ 2 (γσ)2 − lim 1 γ −1 z 1 − γZ ∞ 1 − γZ ∞ 1 − γZ ∞ 1 γ −1 − γσ z∞ z∞ 1 1 z z 0 0 0 0 = = e− ρξN(cid:18)d1(cid:18)ξ, 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γ (γσ)2 z z∞(cid:19)(cid:19) dξ 2! dξ ! ξ 2(cid:19) dξ. 1 1 (cid:19) ξ The exact solution of the above integral equation can be easily calculated by integration by parts and some characteristic solutions. First, consider the following integral equation: e−KξN (cid:18) log z γσ (cid:19) ξ− 1 z∞ 2 + r − ρ − 1 γσ 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γ (γσ)2 ! ξ 1 2! dξ. Z ∞ 0 Let c1 =(cid:18) log z γσ (cid:19) , and c2 =(cid:18) r − ρ + 1 γσ z∞ 2 (γσ)2 (cid:19) . (55) 22 Since we consider the value of Q in the Ω2, z ≥ z⋆(ξ + t) ≥ z∞ implies c1 > 0. By integration by parts, 1 2 )2 ·(cid:16)− √2 !2 +2K x2 c1 2 2 + c2 2 ξ− 3 ξ− 1 2(cid:17) dξ (−c1x−2 + c2)dx. (ξ = x2) 1 1 2(cid:17) 2(cid:17)(cid:21)∞ x−2− √c2 1 2 +c2ξ ξ=0 2 1 2 (c1ξ− = − = 2 + c2ξ 2 + c2ξ 0 0 e 1 + + 1 K 1 K 1 K e−c1c2 Z ∞ e−KξN(cid:16)c1ξ− 1 e−KξN(cid:16)c1ξ− 1 √2πZ ∞ e−Kξ · e K√2πZ ∞ √2(cid:17)2 −(cid:16) c1 Z ∞ Z ∞ e−KξN(cid:16)c1ξ− 1 2 + c2ξ 1 0 0 0 1 Since Abramowitz and Stegun (1972) (p.304, equation (7.4.33)), 0 1 1 = b2 b2 2+2K+c2) e−2ab. 1 K − √π 2a Z ∞ By using above equations , we can get e−2ab, √π 2b exp(cid:26)−a2x2 − x2 exp(cid:26)−a2x2 − 2(cid:17) = x2(cid:27) dx = x2(cid:27) dx = 2 + 2K! e−c1(√c2 2K 1 − c2pc2 α+ +(cid:16) γ−1 γ (cid:17) K1 − α+ − α−  ·(cid:18) z γ (cid:19) , z∞(cid:19)α−+(cid:18) γ−1 qc2 , qc2 γ (cid:17)), 2 + 2K + c2 = −γσ(α− +(cid:16) γ−1 qc2 γ (cid:17)). 2 + 2K − c2 = γσ(α+ +(cid:16) γ−1 2 +(cid:18) r − ρ + 1 e− ρξN(cid:18)(cid:18) log z Z ∞ Q∞(z) =(cid:18)− γ −1−α−(cid:19) zα− + ρ(cid:18)1 −(cid:18) α+ ρ(cid:19) , (cid:19) ξ 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 γσ (cid:19) ξ− 1 By the equation (56) and (57), we can get Q∞ as follows: 2(cid:19) dξ = Similarly, we can derive γσ(α+ − α−) in Ω∞ 2 . γ −1 − 2 + 2K = 2 (γσ)2 1 α− where (z∞) 1 K 1 γ γσ z∞ K 2 1 1 1 z 0 1 1 1 (56) (cid:3) 5 Duality Theorem and Optimal Strategies By analyzing the variational inequality (36) in Section 4, we derive the following integral equation representation of value function of g(t, z) of Problem 4: g(t, z) = − t 1 1 − γZ T 1 − γZ T 1 γ −1 z t z e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(cid:18)s − t, e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)−dγ(cid:18)s − t, z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds, z 23 α+ − α−(cid:19)(cid:18) z z∞(cid:19)α−(cid:19) . (57) where z⋆(t) is the free boundary of Problem 4, N (·) is a standard normal distribution function, and d1(t, z) = log z + (r − ρ + 1 γσ√t 2 (γσ)2)t , dγ(t, z) = log z + (r − ρ − 1 2 (γσ)2 + 1 γσ√t γ (γσ)2)t . Also, in terms of free boundary z⋆(t), we can define the jump region JR and the no-jump region NR as follows: JR = {(t, λ, y) λ ≤ z⋆(t)yγ} and NR = {(t, λ, y) λ > z⋆(t)yγ}. As seen in Figure 1, the free boundary z⋆(t) partitions the (t, z)-region into the jump region and no-jump region. 1 0.9 0.8 γ y / λ 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0 no-jump region NR jump region JR 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) Figure 1: The jump-region and the no-jump region in (t, z)-domain. Remark 5.1. In terms of te regions Ω1 and Ω2 defined in Section 4, JR = {(t, λ, y) (t, λ yγ ) ∈ Ω1} and NR = {(t, λ, y) (t, λ yγ ) ∈ Ω2}. If initially (t, λ, y) ∈ JR, then X should increase immediately, such that λ yγ reaches the free boundary z⋆(t). That is, the principal should increase the agent's consumption process. On the other hand, if (t, λ, y) ∈ NR, X must stay constant and this implies that the principal does not adjust the agent's consumption process. Thus, we call JR and NR the jump region and the no-jump region, respectively. Moreover, the free boundary z⋆(t) satisfies the following integral equation: 1 γ −1 (z⋆(t)) 1 − γ 1 1 − γZ T t t z⋆(t) e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)s − t, Z T e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(cid:18)s − t, z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds. z⋆(t) 0 = − (58) Then, we can directly obtain the following lemma. 24 Lemma 5.1. The optimal stopping time τ ∗ for Problem 4 is given by where z⋆(t) satisfies the integral equation (58). τ ∗ ≡ inf(cid:26)s ≥ t(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)Hs ≤ z⋆(t)(cid:27) ∧ T, By using Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 5.1, we provide a solution to Problem 3 in the following proposition. Proposition 5.1. (a) The infinite series of optimal stopping times {τ ∗(x)}x≥λ in Lemma 3.1 is given by τ ∗(x) = inf{s ≥ t xHs ≤ z⋆(t)} ∧ T. (b) The dual value function is given by λ g(t, y1−γ = − J(t, λ, y) = − y1−γZ ∞ λ "Z T 1 − γZ ∞ −(cid:18) x yγ(cid:19) 1 γ −1Z T 1 − e−K(T −t) + t t γ 1 − γ x yγ )dx + J0(t, λ, y) e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−dγ(s − t, e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(s − t, 1 − e−r(T −t) 1 γ + λ y. x z⋆(s)yγ )(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)yγ )(cid:19) ds# dx x K r Remark 5.2. It is easy to see that the infinite series of optimal stopping times {τ ∗(x)}x≥λ defined in Proposition 5.1 is non-decreasing, left continuous with right limits as function of x. Thus, the optimal stopping problem in (26) can be expressed as follows: sup τ ∗(x)∈[t,T ] EQ t he− ρ(τ ∗(x)−t)h(τ ∗(x), xHτ ∗(x))i = g(t, xHt). (59) Proposition 5.1 (a) characterizes the optimal time to adjust the process X as we discussed earlier. Proposition 5.1 (b) provides the dual value function by using the time- varying function z⋆(t) determining the free boundary for the optimal stopping problem. By Proposition 5.1, ∂λJ(t, λ, y) = y1−γg(cid:18)t, From (41) and (43) in Section 4, λ yγ(cid:19) + ∂λJ0(t, λ, y). (60) ∂λJ(t, λ, y) > y1−γh(cid:18)t, ∂λJ(t, λ, y) = y1−γh(cid:18)t, Hence, we can rewrite λ yγ(cid:19) + ∂λJ0 (t, λ, y) = Ud(t, y), yγ(cid:19) + ∂λJ0(t, λ, y) = Ud(t, y), λ for λ > yγz⋆(t), for λ ≤ yγz⋆(t). JR = {(t, λ, y) ∂λJ(t, λ, y) = Ud(t, y)}, NR = {(t, λ, y) ∂λJ(t, λ, y) > Ud(t, y)}. Now we can state the following corollary. 25 Corollary 5.1. The dual value function J(t, λ, y) can be rewritten by (a) In the no-jump region NR, J(t, λ, y) = − t y1−γ λ "Z T 1 − γZ ∞ −(cid:18) x yγ(cid:19) 1 γ −1Z T 1 − e−K(T −t) 1 − γ · e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(cid:18)s − t, e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−dγ(cid:18)s − t, 1 − e−r(T −t) γ + K λ r γ t 1 + y. x z⋆(s)yγ(cid:19)(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)yγ(cid:19)(cid:19) ds# dx x (b) In the jump-region JR, J(t, λ, y) = J(t, z⋆(t)yγ, y) + (λ − z⋆(t)yγ)Ud(t, y). By applying a standard method of singular control problem developed by Davis and Norman (1990) or Fleming and Soner (2006) to Problem 3, the dual value function J(t, λ, y) satis- fies the certain Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman(HJB) equation. In fact, Miao and Zhang (2015) study the infinite-horizon problem by solving the linear Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equa- tion. The following proposition provides that our derived dual value function J(t, λ, y) satisfies the associated HJB equation. Proposition 5.2. The dual value function J(t, λ, y) satisfies the following HJB equation: min{∂tJ + AJ + y + u(λ), ∂λJ − Ud(t, y)} = 0, J(T, λ, y) = 0, (t, λ, y) ∈ [0, T ] × R+ × R+,  where σ2 2 A = y2∂yy + µy∂y + (r − ρ)λ∂λ − r. Proof. It is sufficient to ∂tJ + AJ + y + u(λ) = 0 in NR, and From the representation of J(t, λ, y) in Proposition 5.1, we have ∂tJ + AJ + y + u(λ) ≥ 0 in JR. γ 1 − γ e−K(T −t)λ 1 γ − er(T −t)y x x x yγ ∂zg(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19)idx yγ(cid:19) + γ yγ(cid:19) −(cid:0)(γ2 − γ) + 2γ2(cid:1) x yγ ∂zg(cid:18)t, x x yγ(cid:19) (61) λ x ∂tJ = y1−γZ ∞ y∂yJ = y1−γZ ∞ y2∂yyJ = y1−γZ ∞ yγ(cid:19)2 − γ2(cid:18) x λ∂λJ = y1−γλg(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19) dx − λ −∂tg(cid:18)t, h − (1 − γ)g(cid:18)t, hγ(1 − γ)g(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19)idx ∂zzg(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19) + 1 1 − γ λ x λ 1 − e−K(T −t) 1 γ . λ K 26 Since the value function g(t, z) satisfies the variational inequality (36), −∂tg(t, x yγ ) − Lg(t, x yγ ) = 0, for (x, y) ∈ NR. (62) By using (61) and (62), AJ(t, λ, y) can be derived as follows: x yγ ∂zg + (ρ − (ρ − r))gidx (63) ∂tJ(t, λ, y) + AJ(t, λ, y) γ2σ2 x λ λ λ λ λ 1 γ − y λ 1 γ − y yγ ∂zg(t, γ 1 − γ x yγ ) + g(t, γ 1 − γ x ∂zzg − (r − ρ + γ2σ2 + (ρ − r)) 2 (cid:18) x yγ(cid:19)2 =y1−γZ ∞ h − ∂tg − − y1−γ(ρ − r)λg(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19) − =y1−γZ ∞ h − ∂tg − Lg(t, yγ ) − (ρ − r)(cid:16) x yγ(cid:19) − − y1−γ(ρ − r)λg(cid:18)t, yγ(cid:19) + g(cid:18)t, yγ ∂zg(cid:18)t, λ (cid:20) x = − y1−γ(ρ − r)(cid:18)Z ∞ = − y1−γ(ρ − r)(cid:18)(cid:20)xg(t, yγ )(cid:21)∞ + λg(cid:18)t, e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)−dγ(cid:18)s − t, 1 − γZ T e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(cid:18)s − t, 1 − γZ T z⋆(s)(cid:17)(cid:17) exponentially converge to 0 as z goes to infinity, it is easy yγ )(cid:17)idx yγ(cid:19)(cid:19) − z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds, Since N(cid:16)−dγ(cid:16)s − t, to show that x yγ(cid:19)(cid:21) dx + λg(cid:18)t, By Lemma 4.6 and g(t, z) = Q(t, z) + h(t, z), we have λ yγ(cid:19)(cid:19) − γ 1 − γ γ 1 − γ λ 1 γ − y 1 γ − y. g(t, z) = z z − z 1 γ −1 z t t x=λ x 1 x λ λ This implies that lim z→∞ zg(t, z) = 0. ∂tJ(t, λ, y) + AJ(t, λ, y) = − y1−γ(ρ − r)(cid:18)(cid:20)xg(t, x yγ )(cid:21)∞ x=λ + λg(cid:18)t, λ yγ(cid:19)(cid:19) − γ 1 − γ λ 1 γ − y = − γ 1 − γ 1 λ γ − y. ∂tJ(t, λ, y) + AJ(t, λ, y) + y + u(λ) = 0. and Since −∂tg(t, we can similarly show that x yγ ) − Lg(t, x yγ ) ≥ 0 for (x, y) ∈ JR, ∂tJ(t, λ, y) + AJ(t, λ, y) + y + u(λ) ≥ 0 in JR. We will now state and prove the main theorem of this paper. 27 (64) (cid:3) Theorem 5.1. (a) For given w satisfying Assumption 3, the value function V (t, w, y) of Problem 2 and the dual value function J(t, λ, y) derived in Proposition 5.1 satisfy the following duality relationship : V (t, w, y) = min λ>0 (J(t, λ, y) − λw) . (65) There exists a unique solution λ∗ with (t, λ∗, y) ∈ NR for the minimization problem (65). (b) For s ∈ [t, T ], the optimal costate process X ∗ s is given by (66) s = max λ∗, sup t≤ξ≤s X ∗ e(ρ−r)(ξ−t)Y γ ξ z⋆(ξ)! , where λ∗ is the unique solution to the minimization problem (65) in (a). Moreover, the optimal costate process {X ∗ s=t satisfies the integrability condition (20). s}T (c) For s ∈ [t, T ], the optimal consumption plan c∗ s and continuation value w∗ t are, respectively, given by C∗ 1 s = (λ∗ s) γ , s)1−γ (λ∗ w∗ s = 1 − γ Z T 1 − γ Z T 1 γ −1 t t (λ∗ s) e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(cid:18)s − t, e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(cid:18)s − t, yγ λ∗ s s z⋆(t)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds s z⋆(s)(cid:19)(cid:19) ds λ∗ s yγ + with λ∗ s ≡ e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s . Proof. We will prove the duality relationship in the theorem in the following steps. (Step 1) First, we will show that the dual value function J(t, λ, y) is strictly convex in λ in NR. Proof of (Step 1) Consider λ1, λ2 > 0 (λ1 6= λ2) with (t, λ1, y), (t, λ2, y) ∈ NR. Let λ3 = αλ1 + (1 − α)λ2 with α ∈ (0, 1). Then, clearly (t, λ3, y) ∈ NR. Also, let X ∗,j be the optimal process for the minimization problem (25) with {X ∗,j s }T s=t ∈ 28 ND(λj ), j = 1, 2, 3. In other words, for j = 1, 2, 3, J(t, λj , y) = inf e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Ys)(cid:17)ds# t X∈N D(λj )(E"Z T + λj Et"Z T =E"Z T +λj Et"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds#) e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,j e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# . t t t s ) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,j s u(Ys)(cid:17)ds# Then, =E"Z T t αJ(t, λ1, y) + (1 − α)J(t, λ2, y) e−r(s−t)(cid:16)αu(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,1 s + (1 − α)X ∗,2 s + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)(αX ∗,1 By (b) in Proposition 5.1, the optimal processes X ∗,j(j = 1, 2, 3) are given by s t ) + (1 − α)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,2 s ) )u(Ys)(cid:17)dsi + λ3Et"Z T ξ z⋆(ξ)! . e(ρ−r)(s−t)Y γ e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# s = max λj , sup t≤ξ≤s X ∗,j Since λ1 6= λ2 and X ∗,j t = λj, we can deduce that 6= X ∗,2 X ∗,1 s s a.s. Thus, by strict convexity of u(·), αu(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,1 s )+(1−α)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,2 s ) > u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)(αX ∗,1 s +(1−α)X ∗,2 s )). Let us temporarily denote ¯X ∗ = (αX ∗,1 s + (1 − α)X ∗,2 s ). Then, s ) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t) ¯X ∗ s u(Ys)(cid:17)ds# αJ(t, λ1, y) + (1 − α)J(t, λ2, y) e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t) ¯X ∗ e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# t t inf ≥ >E"Z T +λ3Et"Z T X∈N D(λ3)(E"Z T + λ3Et"Z T =E"Z T +λ3Et"Z T t t t e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds#) e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,3 e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# = J(t, λ3, y). s t 29 e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Ys)(cid:17)ds# ) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗,3 s u(Ys)(cid:17)ds# This implies that J(t, λ, y) is strictly convex in λ in NR. Now, we rewrite the Lagrangian L in (19) as L(t, λ, y, X) =Et"Z T +λEt"Z T t t e−r(s−t))(cid:16)u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) + Ys − e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xsu(Ys)(cid:17)ds# e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# − λw. (cid:3) (67) with Xt = λ, Yt = y. For simplicity, let L(t, λ, y, X) = L(λ, X). (Step 2) For every enforceable plan C ∈ Γ(t, y, w), every x > 0, and every X ∈ ND(λ), the following inequality is established: L(λ, X) ≥ U P t (y, C) = Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# The equality holds if and only if for all s ∈ [t, T ], Xse−(ρ−r)(s−t)u′(Cs) − 1 = 0, Z T s e−ρ(ξ−s)(U a ξ (C) − Ud(ξ, Yξ))dXξ = 0. This leads to the following weakly duality relationship: V (t, w, y) ≤ inf λ>0 (J(t, λ, y) − λw) . (68) Proof of (Step 2) By the definition of u(·), u(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)Xs) ≥ Xse−(ρ−r)(s−t)u(Cs) − Cs. This leads to L(λ, X) t t ≥Et"Z T +λ Et"Z T =Et"Z T +λ Et"Z T ≥Et"Z T e−r(s−t) (Ys − Cs) ds# + Et"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Ys)ds# − w! e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# + Et"Z T e−ρ(s−t)u(Cs)ds# − w! e−r(s−t)(Ys − Cs)ds# , t t t t t e−r(s−t)(cid:16)Xse−(ρ−r)(s−t)(u(Cs) − u(Ys)(cid:17) ds# e−ρ(s−t)Z T s e−ρ(ξ−s) (u(Cξ) − u(Yξ)) dξ · dXs# where the middle equation follows from integration by parts, and the last inequality follows from the fact C is enforceable and X is in ND(λ). 30 Clearly, the equality holds if and only if Xse−(ρ−r)(s−t)u′(Cs) − 1 = 0, Z T s Moreover, we can immediately obtain e−ρ(ξ−s)(U a ξ (C) − Ud(ξ, Yξ))dXξ = 0. V (t, w, y) ≤ inf λ>0 (J(t, λ, y) − λw) . (cid:3) (Step 3) The consumption plan C∗ defined in (18) is enforceable and optimal. Proof of (Step 3) Let us assume that (X ∗ (24). Under this assumption we first prove that (c∗ we will show the existence and uniqueness of λ∗ and derive (X ∗ the optimal continuation process. s=t ∈ ND(λ∗) minimize the Lagrangian L in s )T s=t is enforceable and optimal. Then s=t. Finally, we derive s )T s)T Since (X ∗ s=t ∈ ND(λ∗), we know that s )T Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)u(X ∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t))# < ∞. From this, it is easy to check that Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)C∗ s ds# < +∞. For sufficiently small δ > 0 and h ∈ (0, δ), we consider λh ≡ λ∗ + h, X h s ≡ X ∗ s + h, and X δ s ≡ X ∗ s + δ Then Similarly, Since t γ e−r(s−t)u((X ∗ Et"Z T 1 − γ(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Et"Z T <(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) γ Et"Z T s + δ)e−(ρ−r)(s−t))ds# e−r(s−t)(cid:16)e−(ρ−r)(s−t)(X ∗ e−r(s−t)u(X ∗ < (1 + δ/λ) s (1 + δ/X ∗ t ))(cid:17) 1 s e−(ρ−r)(s−t))# < ∞. t t 1 Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)u((X ∗ s (1 ± δ))e−(ρ−r)(s−t))ds# < ∞. Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)Ud(Ys)X ∗ s ds# < ∞, 31 γ ds# (69) (70) clearly, we can have Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)Ud(Ys)(Xs + δ)ds# < ∞. The convexity of u(·) implies e−(ρ−r)(s−t)u(C∗ s ) ≤ ≤ Thus, u(X h u(X δ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ h δ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) e−ρ(s−t)u(C∗ s )ds# t E"Z T ≤E"Z T E"Z T 1 λ∗ t t e−r(s−t)u(C∗ s ) e−r(s−t)(cid:16)u(X ∗ (69),(71), and (72) imply X h ∈ ND(λ∗ + h). ≤ λ∗ e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s ds# s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) + C∗ s(cid:17) ds# < ∞. Since (X ∗ s=t ∈ ND(λ∗) minimizes the Lagrangian L, s )T L(λh, X h) ≥ L(λ∗, X ∗). Hence, or, equivalently, L(λh, X h) − L(λ∗, X ∗) h lim h↓0 ≥ 0. (71) (72) e−r(s−t) u(X h s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) The Dominated Convergence Theorem implies ds# − w ≥ 0. ds# − w ds# − w lim h↓0 lim h↓0 t Et"Z T Et"Z T =Et"lim h↓0Z T =Et"Z T t t t h h e−r(s−t) u(X h s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) e−r(s−t) u(X h s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ s )ds# − w ≥ 0. h e−ρ(s−t)u(C∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) Thus, C∗ satisfies the promise-keeping constraints. Similar to Miao and Zhang (2015), define X h(w, ξ) ≡ X ∗(t, ξ) + h1A×(s,T ](w, ξ) for h ∈ (0, δ), s ∈ [t, T ] and A ∈ Fs. Note X h By a similar argument, we can obtain t = X ∗ t = λ∗. X h ∈ ND(λ∗). 32 Since This leads to L(λ∗, X h) − L(λ∗, X ∗) h lim h↓0 ≥ 0. e−ρ(ξ−t)U (C∗ ξ )dξ# ≥ Eth1Ae−ρ(s−t)Ud(s, Ys)i . s Et"1AZ T Us(C) = Es"Z T s Since A was an arbitrary set in Fs, we deduce that e−ρ(ξ−s)U (C∗ ξ )dξ# ≥ Ud(s, Ys), for any s ∈ [t, T ]. Therefore, the consumption plan C∗ is enforceable. Now we will show that C∗ is optimal. For h ∈ (0, δ), let us consider X ±h ≡ X ∗(1 ± h). By the following convexity of u(·), u(X −δ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ −δ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) u(X ±h s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) − u(X ∗ ±h u(X δ δ ≤ ≤ s e−(ρ−r)(s−t)) and the condition (70), we can deduce X ±h ∈ ND(λ∗(1 + h)). Since L(λ∗(1 ± h), X ±h) ≥ L(λ∗, X ∗), lim h↓0 L(λ∗(1 + h), X h) − L(λ∗, X ∗) L(λ∗(1 − h), X −h) − L(λ∗, X ∗) −h By the Dominated Convergence theorem and integration by parts, h ≥ 0, lim h↑0 ≥ 0 λ∗ (Ut(C∗) − w) + Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)Z T s e−ρ(ξ−s)(cid:0)u(C∗ ξ ) − u(Yξ)(cid:1) dξ · dXs# = 0. Thus, the promise keeping constraint and the participation constraint must hold with equality for the consumption plan C∗. Since t (y, C∗) ≤ U P sup C∈Γ(t,y,w) U P t (t, y, C) ≤ inf X∈N D(λ) L(t, λ, y, X) − λw ≤ L(t, λ∗, X ∗) − λ∗w, we conclude that the consumption plan C∗ is optimal and the following duality relationship holds: V (t, w, y) = inf λ>0{J(t, λ, y) − λw} . (cid:3) 33 (Step 4) Determination of λ∗ in the duality relationship (65) and the optimal process (X ∗ s )T s=t. By Lemma 4.6 and (60), ∂λJ(t, λ, y) =y1−γg(t, λ yγ ) + ∂λJ0(t, λ, y) e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(s − t, e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(s − t, )(cid:19) ds )(cid:19) ds. yγz⋆(s) λ λ yγz⋆(s) = + t t λ 1 γ −1 y1−γ 1 − γZ T 1 − γZ T ∂λJ(t, λ, y) = and we deduce that lim λ→∞ ∞ 0 if 0 < γ < 1, if 1 < γ. Moreover, by Lemma 4.2 or the value matching condition for g(t, z), ∂λJ(t, z⋆(t)yγ, y) = Ud(t, y). By (Step 1), J(t, λ, y) is strictly convex in λ in NR, i.e., ∂λλJ(t, λ, y) > 0 in NR. This implies that ∂λJ(t, λ, y) is strictly increasing in λ in NR. Thus, for given w satisfying Assumption 3, there exists a unique λ∗ such that w = ∂λJ(t, λ∗, y) and (t, λ∗, y) ∈ NR. Now, we will determine the optimal shadow process (X ∗ s=t ∈ ND(λ∗). s )T Since the optimal stopping time τ in Problem 4 is given by τ = inf{s 1 ≤ e(ρ−r)(s−t)z⋆(s)Y γ s }, the optimal stopping time τ (x) in Lemma 3.1 can be written by τ (x) = inf{s x ≤ e(ρ−r)(s−t)z⋆(s)Y γ s }. Since s < x} = {s < τ (x)} =(cid:26) max {X ∗ t≤θ≤s e(ρ−r)(θ−t)z⋆(θ)Y γ θ < x(cid:27) , the optimal process (X ∗ s )T s=t can be expressed explicitly as X ∗ s = max(cid:18)λ∗, max t≤θ≤s e(ρ−r)(θ−t)z⋆(θ)Y γ θ(cid:19) . 34 By defining λ∗ s = e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s , since Problem 5.1 is time consistent, we can deduce that dual value function J(s, λ∗ s, Ys) at time s ∈ [t, T ] is given by J(s, λ∗ s, Ys) = − e− ρ(ξ−s)N(cid:18)−d1(ξ − s, e− ρ(ξ−s)N(cid:18)−d1(ξ − s, s Y 1−γ s λ∗s "Z T 1 − γ Z ∞ s (cid:19) 1 −(cid:18) x γ −1Z T 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 − e−K(T −s) Y γ K γ s + (λ∗ s) 1 γ + 1 − e−r(T −s) r z⋆(ξ)Y γ s x z⋆(ξ)Y γ s x )(cid:19) dξ )(cid:19) dξ# dx Ys(cid:19) . and satisfies the duality-relationship: V (s, Ys, ws) = inf λ>0 {J(s, λ, Ys) − wsλ} = J(s, λ∗ s, Ys) − wsλ∗ s. By the first-order condition, we obtain ws =∂λJ(s, λ∗ s, Ys) = + Y 1−γ s 1 − γ Z T 1 − γ Z T e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(s − t, e−K(s−t)N(cid:18)dγ(s − t, t 1 γ −1 (λ∗ s) t λ∗ s Y γ s z⋆(s) λ∗ s Y γ s z⋆(s) )(cid:19) ds )(cid:19) ds. (Step 5) The optimal process (X ∗ s )T s=t satisfies the integrability condition (20). Proof of (Step 5) It is enough to show that Et"Z T t e−r(s−t)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s ) 1 γ ds# < ∞ and Et"Z T t e−ρ(s−t)Y 1−γ s X ∗ s ds# < ∞ First, we will utilize the idea in Lemma 3.1. 1 γ ds# e−r(s−t)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s ) t Et"Z T =Et"Z T =Et"Z T t t 1 x 1 γ e−K(s−t)(X ∗ s ) γ ds# e−K(s−t) Z X∗s Et"Z T γZ ∞ λ∗ Z T λ∗ + λ∗ + 1 γ X∗t 1 t t = = 1 − e−K(T −t) 1 − e−K(T −t) K K 1 γ −1dx + X ∗ t! ds# e−K(s−t)(cid:18)Z ∞ e−K(s−t)x 1 x λ∗ γ −11{X∗s ≥x}dx(cid:19) ds# γ −1Et(cid:2)1{s≥τ (x)∗}(cid:3) dsdx, 1 where the last equality is obtained from Fubini's theorem. By Proposition 5.1, we can obtain P(s ≥ τ (x)∗) = P(xHs ≤ z⋆(s)). 35 Since dHs = (r − ρ + γσ2)Hsds − γσHsdBs under the measure P with Ht = 1/yγ, we can easily obtain that P(s ≥ τ (x)∗) = N(cid:18)−dγ(s − t, z⋆(s)yγ )(cid:19) . x Et"Z T Forez⋆(s) = z⋆(T − s), ξ = s − t and τ = T − t, γ ds# γ −1N(cid:18)−dγ(ξ, e−r(s−t)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s ) e−Kξx λ∗ + = 1 0 t 1 1 1 By using the result in Proof of Lemma 4.8, we can derive (73) (74) + K 1 1 − e−K(T −t) γZ ∞ γZ ∞ λ∗ K λ∗ K + λ∗ λ∗ 1 < = Z ∞ 0 e−KξN(cid:18)−dγ(ξ, By (73) and (74), we deduce Et"Z T t < λ∗ K + 1 γ Similarly, γ ) 0 1 0 1 x x x x x lim e−Kξx e−r(s−t)(e−(ρ−r)(s−t)X ∗ s ) z∞yγ(cid:19)α−+( γ−1 γZ ∞ λ∗ Z τ τ →∞(cid:20)Z τ e−KξN(cid:18)−dγ(ξ, γ −1Z ∞ K z∞yγ )(cid:19) dξ = γ −1N(cid:18)−dγ(ξ, ez⋆(τ − ξ)yγ )(cid:19) dξdx ez⋆(τ − ξ)yγ )(cid:19) dξ(cid:21) dx z∞yγ )(cid:19) dξdx. α+ +(cid:16) γ−1 γ (cid:17) α+ − α−  ·(cid:18) x γ ds# α+ +(cid:16) γ−1 γ (cid:17) α+ − α−  (z∞yγ) γ −1−α−Z ∞ s ds# s Z X∗s y1−γλ∗ + Et"Z T y1−γλ∗ + y1−γ EQ"Z T y1−γλ∗ + y1−γZ ∞ λ∗ Z T t!# s Z X∗s 1dx! ds# 1{X∗s ≥x}(cid:19) ds# e− ρ(s−t)(cid:18)Z ∞ e− ρ(s−t)EQ(cid:2)1{s≥τ (x)∗}(cid:3) dsdx, K xα− dx < ∞. e−ρ(s−t)Y 1−γ 1dx + X ∗ X∗t X∗t λ∗ λ∗ 1 t t t 1 1 e−ρ(s−t)Y 1−γ s X ∗ e−ρ(s−t)Y 1−γ t Et"Z T =Et"Z T t = = = 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ 1 − e− ρ(T −t) ρ where the measure Q is defined in Lemma 3.1. Since dHs = (r − ρ + γ2σ2)Hsds − γσHsdBQ s , 36 we have Q(s ≥ τ (x)∗) = Q(xHs ≤ z⋆(t)) = N(cid:18)−d1(s − t, x z⋆(s)yγ )(cid:19) . By using the result in Proof of Lemma 4.8, we deduce that 1 − e− ρ(T −t) Et"Z T t = < = ρ y1−γλ∗ ρ y1−γλ∗ ρ s X ∗ e−ρ(s−t)Y 1−γ s ds# y1−γλ∗ + y1−γZ ∞ λ∗ Z T e− ρξN(cid:18)−d1(ξ, + y1−γZ ∞ λ∗ Z ∞ ρ(cid:18) α+ α+ − α−(cid:19) (z∞)−α− y1−γ−α−γZ ∞ e− ρ(s−t)N(cid:18)−d1(s − t, z∞yγ )(cid:19) dξdx x + λ∗ 1 0 t xα−dx < ∞. x z⋆(s)yγ )(cid:19) dsdx Thus, we can conclude that the optimal process (X ∗ tion (20). s )T s=t satisfies the integrability condi- (cid:3) From (Step 1) -- (Step 5), we have just proved Theorem 5.1. (cid:3) We will now show the convergence of the optimal strategies for a finite horizon problem to those for the infinite horizon problem. Theorem 5.2. agent's optimal consumption C∗ by For t ≥ 0, as time to maturity goes to infinity, i.e., T − t → ∞, the t,∞ at time t are given t,∞ and the optimal promised value w∗ C∗ t,∞ =(λ∗ w∗ t,∞ = − 1 γ , t,∞) 1 1 K γ 1 α− (z∞Y γ t ) 1 γ −1−α−(λ∗ t,∞)α− + 1 1 − γ 1 K (λ∗ t,∞) 1 γ −1, where α− and z∞ are defined in (47) and (45) in Section 4, respectively, λ∗ and t,∞ = e−(ρ−r)tX ∗ t,∞, t,∞ = max λ∗ X ∗ ∞, z∞ sup 0≤ξ≤t e(ρ−r)ξY γ ξ ! . Moreover, λ∗ ∞ is a unique solution to the following algebraic equation: w = − 1 γ 1 K 1 α− (z∞yγ) Proof. By Lemma 4.8, 1 γ −1−α−(λ∗ ∞)α− + 1 1 − γ 1 K (λ∗ ∞) 1 γ −1. lim T −t→∞ Q(t, z) = Q∞(z) and lim T −t→∞ z⋆(t) = z∞, where Q∞(z) and z∞ are defined in (44) and (45), respectively. Thus, we have g∞(z) ≡ lim T −t→∞ g(t, z) = Q∞(z) + 37 1 1 − γ(cid:18) 1 ρ − 1 K z 1 γ −1(cid:19) , and J∞(y, w) = lim T −t→∞ J(t, y, w) = −y1−γZ ∞ λ g∞(cid:18) x yγ(cid:19) dx + γ 1 − γ 1 K 1 γ + λ 1 r y. From Theorem 5.1, we can derive C∗ w∗ 1 γ t,∞) t,∞ =(λ∗ t,∞Y γ t,∞ =∂λJ∞(λ∗ t ) 1 α− = − 1 K 1 γ (z∞Y γ t ) 1 γ −1−α−(λ∗ t,∞)α− + 1 1 − γ 1 K (λ∗ t,∞) 1 γ −1. where λ∗ t,∞ = e−(ρ−r)tX ∗ t,∞ and t,∞ = max λ∗ X ∗ ∞, z∞ sup 0≤ξ≤t e(ρ−r)ξY γ ξ ! . Here, λ∗ ∞ is a unique solution to the following algebraic equation: w = − 1 γ 1 K 1 α− (z∞yγ) 1 γ −1−α−(λ∗ ∞)α− + 1 1 − γ 1 K (λ∗ ∞) 1 γ −1. For this infinite horizon case, the uniqueness of λ∗ ∞ was proven by Miao and Zhang (2015). (cid:3) Remark 5.3. consistent with those of Section 2 in Miao and Zhang (2015). For α = 1 − γ and β = 1 − γ − γα−, the results in Theorem 5.2 are 6 Numerical Illustrations In this section, we illustrate numerical simulation results for optimal contracting policies. The optimal contracting policies stated in Theorem 5.1 is not fully explicit, since it requires solving the integral equation (58) for the free boundary z⋆(t). Thus, we should solve for the free boundary by numerical methods. Thus, we solve the integral equation (58) by the recursive integration method proposed by Huang et al. (1996). s/Y γ Figure 2 presents simulation paths of the optimal consumption C∗, the optimal costate process X ∗, and the regulated process λ∗/Y γ. The optimal costate process X ∗ s ensures that (s, λ∗ s ) will never leave the no-jump region for s ∈ [t, T ] as shown in Figure 2 (a). Whenever λ∗/Y γ low enough to hit the free boundary z⋆, the non-decreasing process X ∗ increases in Figure 2 (b). The reason is that the optimal costate process X ∗ have the property that it increases only when λ∗/Y γ hits the free boundary, at which time the participation constraints (5) bind. This leads to increase s in the optimal consumption C∗. In other words, if income process Y increases enough and thus λ∗/Y γ decreases and hits the free boundary, the principal should increase the agent's consumption C∗ so that the agent does not walk away from the contract, as shown in Figure 2 (c). Figure 3 which is representative of the case where ρ > r, show ing a simulation path of optimal consumption allocation. In the case of ρ > r, however, the optimal consumption 38 z 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 Regulated process λ∗Y γ Free boundary z⋆ 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) (a) λ∗/Y γ ∗ X 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Optimal process X ∗ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) (b) X ∗ ∗ C n o i t p m u s n o C 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0 Optimal consumption C ∗ Income process Y 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) (c) C ∗ Figure 2: Simulation of the optimal consumption C ∗, the optimal process X ∗ and the regulated process λ∗/Y γ. The parameter values are as follows: ρ = 0.04, r = 0.04, µ = 0.02 σ = 0.1, γ = 3, w = −5, and T = 30. C∗ gradually decreases even when the regulated process λ∗/Y γ does not hit the free boundary. Figure 4 shows the comparison results of the optimal consumption C∗ and the first-best consumption C F B in two different scenarios. Two scenarios correspond to two different sample paths of the income process generated with the same parameter values. In the first scenario (scenario 1), the income process steadily increases whereas the income process tends to decrease in the second scenario (scenario 2). Since the first-best consumption defined in (10) is a deterministic function, C F B is the same in both scenarios. In contrast to the first-best allocation, the optimal consumption C∗ in limited commitments depends on the entire history of income process Yt. In other words, the optimal consumption C∗ also increases as income steadily increases in the scenario 1. That is, although C∗ < C F B at the beginning, as time passes, the optimal consumption C∗ exceeds the first-best allocation C F B, as shown in Figure 4 (a). In scenario 2, however, since the income process Y gradually decreases, the optimal consumption C∗ does not exceed first-best allocation 39 ∗ C n o i t p m u s n o C 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0 Optimal consumption C ∗ Income process Y 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) Figure 3: Simulation of optimal consumption C ∗. The parameter values are as follows: ρ = 0.07, r = 0.04, µ = 0.02 σ = 0.1, γ = 3 w = −5 and T = 30. ∗ C n o i t p m u s n o C 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Optimal consumption C ∗ First-best consumption C F B Income process Y 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) ∗ C n o i t p m u s n o C 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 Optimal consumption C ∗ First-best consumption C F B Income process Y 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time(year) (a) Scenario 1 (b) Scenario 2 Figure 4: Simulation of optimal consumption C ∗. The parameter values are as follows: ρ = 0.07, r = 0.04, µ = 0.02 σ = 0.1, γ = 3 w = −5 and T = 30. C F B until maturity T . 7 Concluding Remarks In this paper we study the optimal contracting problem with limited commitment be- tween a risk-neutral principal and a risk-averse agent in the finite horizon. We establish the duality relationship and transform the dual problem into an infinite series of optimal stopping problems, which essentially becomes a single optimal stopping problem. This is similar in its formal structure to an irreversible incremental investment problem studied in Pindyck (1988) and Dixit and Pindyck (1994). Based on partial differential equation theory, we characterize the variational inequality arising from the optimal stopping prob- lem. We also derive an integral equation representation of optimal strategy and provide numerical results for the optimal strategy. 40 Acknowledgments. Junkee Jeon gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Grant No. NRF-2017R1C1B1001811). Hyeng Kuen Koo gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Research Founda- tion of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (Grant No. NRF- 2016R1A2B4008240). Kyunghyun Park is supported by NRF Global Ph.D Fellowship (2016H1A2A1908911). References Abramowitz M, Stegun I (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Function. Dover. Ai H, Hartman-Glaser B (2014) A Theory of Optimal Capital Structure and Endogenous Bankruptcy. Working Paper. Ai H, Li R (2015) Investment and CEO Compensation under Limited Commitment. Jour- nal of Financial Economics 116(3):452 - 472. Ai H, Kiku D, Li R (2016) A Mechanism Design Model of Firm Dynamics: The Case of Limited Commitment. Working Paper. Alvarez F, Jermann U (2000) Efficiency, Equilibrium, and Asset Pricing with Risk of Default. Econometrica 68(4):775-797. Bellman R (1954) The theory of dynamic programming. mimeo Rand Corporation. Bolton P, Wang N, Yang J (2016) Liquidity and Risk Management: Coordinating Invest- ment and Compensation Policies. Working Paper. Carr P, Jarrow R, Myneni R (1992) Alternative Characterizations of American Put Op- tions. Math. Finance 2(2):87 -- 106. Cox J, Huang C (1989) Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Polices when Asset Prices Follow a Diffusion Process. J. Econ. Theory 49(1):33-83. Davis M, Norman A (1990) Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 15:676 -- 713. Detemple J (2005) American-Style Derivatives: Valuation and Computation. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Dixit A, Pindyck, R (1994) Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press. Eaton J, Gersovitz M (1981) Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48(2):289 -- 309. 41 Fleming W, Soner H (2006) Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions. (Springer-Verlag) New York. Friedman A (1975) Parabolic variational inequalities in one space dimension and smooth- ness of the free boundary. J. Funct. Anal. 18(2):151 -- 176. Grochulski B, Zhang Y (2011) Optimal Risk Sharing and Borrowing Constraints in a Continuous-Time Model with Limited Commitment. J. Econ. Theory 146(6):2356-2388. He H, Pagés H (1993) Labor Income, Borrowing Constraints, and Equilibrium Asset Prices. Economic Theory 3(4):663-696. Huang J, Subrahmanyam M, Yu G (1996) Pricing and hedging American options: A recursive integration method. Rev. Financ. Stud. 9(1):277 -- 300. Jacka S (1991) Optimal Stopping and the American Put. Math. Finance 1(2):1 -- 14. Jeon J, Koo H, Shin Y (2018) Portfolio selection with consumption ratcheting. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 92:153 -- 182. Karatzas I, Lehoczky J, Shreve S (1987) Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a "Small Investor" on a Finite Horizon. SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(6):1557-1586. Karatzas I, Shreve S (1998) Methods of Mathematical Finance. Springer-Verlag New York. Kim I (1990) The Analytic Valuation of American Options. Rev. Financ. Stud. 3(4):547 -- 572. Kehoe T, Levine D (1993) Debt Constrained Asset Markets. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60(4):865- 888. Krylov N (1980) Controlled Diffusion Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag. Lieberman G (1996) Second Order Parabolic Differential Equations. World Scientific Sin- gapore. Liu H (2015) Properties of American Volatility Options in the Mean-Reverting 3/2 Volatil- ity Model. SIAM J.Financial Math. 6:53 -- 65. Miao J, Zhang Y (2015) A preference change and discretionary stopping in a consumption and portfolio selection problem. J. Econ. Theory 159:929-988. Oksendal B (2005) Stochastic Differential Equations. 6th-ed Springer. Pindyck R (1988) Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm. Amer. Econ. Rev. 78(5):969 -- 985. Thomas J, Worrall T (1988) Self-Enforcing Wage Contracts. Rev. Econ. Stud. 55(4):541- 553. 42 Yang Z, Koo H (2018) Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Selection with Early Retire- ment Option. Math. Oper. Res. forthcoming. Zhang Y (2013) Characterization of a risk sharing contract with one-sided commitment. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 37:794 -- 809. 43
1908.07561	2	1908	2019-12-03T08:36:06	New developments in revealed preference theory: decisions under risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice	[ "econ.TH", "cs.GT", "econ.EM" ]	This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testable implications of these theories for data on choice from classical linear budget sets are described, and shown to follow a common thread. The theories all imply an inverse relation between prices and quantities, with different qualifications depending on the functional forms in the theory under consideration.	econ.TH	econ	NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN REVEALED PREFERENCE THEORY: DECISIONS UNDER RISK, UNCERTAINTY, AND INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE. FEDERICO ECHENIQUE Abstract. This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theo- ries of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertempo- ral choice. The testable implications of these theories for data on choice from classical linear budget sets are described, and shown to follow a common thread. The theories all imply an inverse re- lation between prices and quantities, with different qualifications depending on the functional forms in the theory under considera- tion. Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technol- ogy, Pasandea CA 91125; email: [email protected]. I thank Taisuke Imai, Kota Saito and John Quah for comments on an earlier draft, and the National Sci- ence Foundation for support through the grants SES-1558757 and CNS-1518941. This paper has been accepted for publication in Volume 12 of the Annual Re- view of Economics. When citing this paper, please use the following: Echenique FE. 2019. "New developments in revealed preference theory: decisions under risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice," Annu. Rev. Econ. 12: Submitted. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082019-110800. 1 2 1. Introduction 2. The model Contents 2.1. Notational conventions and basic definitions. 2.2. The model 3. Additive separability 4. Choice under risk and uncertainty 4.1. Risk: Expected utility 4.2. Uncertainty: Subjective Expected Utility. 4.3. Uncertainty: Maxmin Expected Utility 4.4. Expected utility without risk aversion 4.5. Probabilistic sophistication 5. Intertemporal choice: exponential discounting 6. Multiple physical goods 6.1. Risk 6.2. Intertemporal choice 7. Conclusion References 2 4 4 5 8 12 12 13 16 17 19 21 22 23 25 26 27 1. Introduction Revealed preference theory has a long and distinguished history in economics, giving empirical meaning to the hypothesis of rationality in neoclassical economics. The investigations of Samuelson (1938), Houthakker (1950), Afriat (1967), Diewert (1973), and Varian (1982) clarified the precise behavioral meaning of the hypothesis that a con- sumer maximizes utility. The theory culminates in the celebrated Afriat's theorem (Theorem 1 below), which states that the empirical content of rational behavior (utility maximization by a locally non- satiated consumer) is the same as that of a consumer with a monotone increasing and concave utility function. In turn, the datasets that are RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 3 consistent with the theory are those that satisfy Afriat's "General- ized Axiom of Revealed Preference" (GARP; the terminology is due to Varian (1982)).1 While the older literature deals with general utility maximization, recent developments in revealed preference theory have sought to un- derstand the empirical content of specific theories of rational choice, in specific economic environments. This work is the focus of the present survey. I focus on decisions under risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice. Within each of these domains, there are theories that stand out as ubiquitous in economic modeling: expected utility theory for choice under risk, subjective expected utility for choice under uncertainty, and exponential discounting for intertemporal choice. I shall describe how the GARP needs to be strengthened to capture each of the specific theories in question. For most of the discussion, I will consider the theories under the additional assumption that pref- erences are convex. As a consequence, first-order conditions suffice to characterize optimizing behavior, which affords some significant sim- plifications. We shall see that the relevant strengthenings of GARP all have the flavor of a negative relation between prices and quantities. For ex- ample, a risk-averse expected-utility agent who chooses to consume more conditional on state s1 than conditional on state s2, must either think that s1 is more likely than s2, or face cheaper prices for con- sumption conditional on state s1 than on s2. Such simple statements can be combined to provide a precise characterizations of risk-averse expected utility theory. More generally, all the theories under consid- eration imply that the data display a negative relation between prices and quantities under certain qualifications that can be traced to the functional form assumed by the theory. 1There are a number of existing surveys of the revealed preference literature: see Varian (2006); Carvajal et al. (2004); Cherchye et al. (2009); Crawford & De Rock (2014); Chambers & Echenique (2016). 4 ECHENIQUE The theories under consideration are heavily used in economics. The workhorse model in macroeconomics and finance, for example, assumes expected utility theory for environments under risk and uncertainty, and discounted utility for intertemporal models. The maxmin model has more recently been used in macroeconomics (Hansen & Sargent, 2008). It is also worth mentioning that the revealed preference theory of utility maximization that emerges from Afriat's theory has been extended in various ways, and applied empirically in many different settings. See for example Matzkin & Richter (1991), Matzkin (1994) and Blundell et al. (2003); or more generally Chambers & Echenique (2016) for an extensive review of these extensions and applications. The survey is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces the model and basic definitions and notational conventions. In 2.2.1 I present as background a discussion of general utility maximization and Afriat's theorem. Then Section 3 treats the case of additively-separable util- ity as warm-up, and because many of the remaining theories will fol- low similar ideas. Then in 4.1 I turn to decisions under risk, and expected utility theory. Section 4.2 deals with uncertainty and subjec- tive expected utility, while Section 4.3 considers the maxmin model. Then 4.4 presents a result on expected utility without assuming risk aversion. Section 4.5 provides a necessary condition for data to be consistent with probabilistic sophistication. I turn to intertemporal choice in Section 5, and consider the extensions of expected utility and discounted utility to multiple goods per period or state in Section 6. Finally, Section 7 concludes. 2. The model 2.1. Notational conventions and basic definitions. For vectors x, y ∈ Rn, x ≤ y means that xi ≤ yi for all i = 1, . . . , n; x < y means that x ≤ y and x 6= y; and x ≪ y means that xi < yi for all i = 1, . . . , n. The set of all x ∈ Rn with 0 ≤ x is denoted by Rn +, and the set of all x ∈ Rn with 0 ≪ x is denoted by Rn ++. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 5 Next, consider given a finite sequence {xk : k = 1, . . . , K} in Rn. n, and we can For each k we have a collection of real numbers xk imagine forming pairs of elements drawn from 1, . . . , xk {xk l : 1 ≤ k ≤ K; 1 ≤ l ≤ n}. Two properties of such sequences of pairs will be important, and their importance will become clear later on. Definition 1. A sequence of pairs (xki )I i=1 is balanced if each k appears as ki (on the left of the pair) the same number of times it appears as k′ i (on the right). i l′ i li , xk′ Definition 2. A balanced sequence of pairs (xki )I i=1 is doubly bal- anced if each l appears as li (on the left of the pair) the same number of times it appears as l′ i (on the right). i l′ i li , xk′ 2.2. The model. I shall exclusively consider the neoclassical theory of the consumer. The theory specifies as primitive a consumption space X, which is a subset of some Euclidean space, and a collection U of utility functions u : X → R. Throughout this survey, X will be Rn +, the positive orthant of Rn. I shall deal with risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal tradeoffs simply by adopting different interpretations for the vectors in Rn +. In the abstract, the vector x = (x1, . . . , xn) ∈ Rn + involves consumption of xl units of "good" l. By interpreting the word "good" we can capture risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice.2 In each case we shall appropriately restrict U to capture the most commonly considered theories of choice under risk and uncertainty, or intertemporal choice. To sum up, then, a pair (X, U) describes the theory under consideration; and for the purpose of this survey I shall take X to equal the positive orthant of some Euclidean space. The second order of business is to specify what is assumed observable: what is the available data. I shall focus on choice data drawn from the neoclassical theory of the consumer. Specifically: 2Debreu (1959) contains a well-known discussion of such interpretations. 6 ECHENIQUE Definition 3. A dataset is a finite collection of pairs (x, p) ∈ Rn Rn + × ++. The source of a dataset is a consumer, whom we have recorded mak- ing a finite collection of choices. In actual empirical applications of the theory, the data can come from consumption surveys drawn from the field, from a laboratory experiment, or from a hybrid design. Each choice consists of an element x ∈ Rn + selected from a budget B(p, I) = {z ∈ Rn + : p · z ≤ I}; where p is a price vector, and I = p · x is income. Note that (x, p) describes all we need to know about the choice and about the budget. The vector p is the relevant price vector, and p·x is the relevant income. Of course, this presumes that expenditure exhausts income: some times this assumption can be questionable. Next, we spell out the empirical content of a theory. The empirical content consists of all the datasets that are consistent with the the- ory.3 Given a collection of utility functions U, we say that a data set (xk, pk)K k=1 is U-rational if there exists U ∈ U such that, for each k, xk ∈ argmax{U(x) : x ∈ B(pk, pk · xk)}. 2.2.1. General utilities. For context, I give a quick overview of the most important result in revealed preference theory: Afriat's theorem. To this end, let ULNS be the set of locally non-satiated utility func- tions, and UMC be the set of strictly monotonic and concave utility functions. Given a dataset (xk, pk)K k=1, we can define two binary relations on Rn +. First, say that x RP y, "x is revealed preferred to y," if there exists k such that x = xk, and pk · y ≤ pk · xk. Second, say that that x P P y, "x is strictly revealed preferred to y," if there exists k such that x = xk, and pk · y < pk · xk. 3See Chambers et al. (2014) for a formal study of empirical content. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 7 A dataset (xk, pk)K k=1 satisfies the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) if there is no pair of observations k and k′ such that xk RP xk′ while xk′ P P xk. A dataset that violates WARP cannot be ULNS rational. A dataset (xk, pk)K Preference (GARP) if, for any finite sequence (ki)M if xki RP xki+1 for i = 1, . . . , M − 1, then it is false that xkM P P xk1. k=1 satisfies the Generalized Axiom of Revealed i=1 in {1, . . . , K}, Theorem 1. Let (xk, pk)K are equivalent. k=1 be a dataset. The following statements (1) The dataset is ULNS -rational. (2) The dataset satisfies GARP. (3) There are scalars V k and λk > 0, for 1 ≤ k ≤ K, such that V k ≤ V k′ + λk′ pk′ · (xk − xk′ ) for 1 ≤ k, k′ ≤ K. (4) The dataset is UMC -rational. Theorem 1 is due to Afriat (1967) (see also Diewert (1973) and Varian (1982)). A proof (in fact, two proofs) and a detailed discussion of Afriat's theorem can be found in Chambers & Echenique (2016). The system of linear inequalities in Statement (3) is termed "Afriat inequal- ities," and can be seen as fitting the data to the first-order conditions that characterize an optimum. In the rest of the survey, the idea of fitting the data to the relevant first-order conditions will be the source of many results. The best-known implication of Theorem 1 is that if a dataset is ULNS -rational, then it is also UMC rational. In other words, the hy- pothesis that a consumer chooses as if maximizing a concave utility has the same empirical content as the seemingly much laxer hypothesis of maximizing a locally non-satiated utility. 2.2.2. Specific utilities. In this survey, I shall focus on choice under risk and uncertainty, and intertemporal choice. For the case of risk 8 ECHENIQUE and uncertainty, I suppose that there is a finite set S of states of the world ; let S = n. In this case, a consumption vector x ∈ Rn + consists of a state-contingent payoff. There is a single physical good; think of this good as money, and the state-contingent payoff is in units of money. Put differently, the consumer chooses a delivery x ∈ RS + of money that depends on the state. The consumer could have access to financial markets in which a full set of Arrow-Debreu securities are traded, and obtain x as the payoff derived from a portfolio of Arrow- Debreu securities. The price vector p reflects the prices of the securities, and income I = p · x is how much the consumer can afford to spend. For intertemporal choice, I shall assume that there are T time periods + represents consumption over time. Again, there + is a consumption path, (T = n), and x ∈ RT is a single good, termed "money," and x ∈ RT representing dated quantities of consumption. 3. Additive separability As an introduction to the main ideas in the survey, I shall consider the theory of additively separable utility. In the case of intertemporal choice, additive separability coincides with no-discounting stationary utility (as analyzed, for example, by Browning (1989), but more on that later in the survey). In the case of choice under risk or uncertainty, a consumer with additive utility has a uniform prior over states. All states are equally likely. Let UAS be the class of utility functions U : Rn + → R for which there exists a concave and strictly increasing u : R+ → R such that U(x) ≥ U(y) if and only if n X l=1 u(xl) ≥ n X l=1 u(yl). Consider the problem that a UAS -rational consumer is supposed to be solving, or acting as if she is solving: max{ n X l=1 u(xl) : x ∈ B(p, I)}. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 9 x2 x2 x x x1 x2 x1 x1 Figure 1. Additively separable utility Suppose, for the purpose of exposition, that u is smooth. Then the first- order conditions of the maximization problem (assuming an interior solution) imply that u′(xl) u′(xl′) = pl pl′ . The first-order condition, and the concavity of u, imply that whenever xl > xl′ it must be the case that pl pl′ of good l than of l′ is only possible when l is cheaper than l′: demand ≤ 1. In words, larger consumption "slopes down." As an example, consider the diagram on the left in Figure 1. It depicts a budget set where good one is cheaper than good two: the budget set below the 45-degree line is larger than that above. If a dataset would include a choice of x on this budget set, it would violate downward-sloping demand and not be UAS -rational. Choices such as x are, in and of themselves, compatible with UAS. But we shall see that, together with other observations in a dataset, they can still trigger a rejection of the theory of additively separable utility. So the theory of additively separable utility has implications for the data, a property that we think of as downward-sloping demand: it 10 ECHENIQUE says that larger price are associated with smaller quantities.4 We shall express this downward-sloping demand property in a way that turns out to be useful for the rest of our analysis: Definition 4. A sequence of pairs (xki demand property if li , xk′ i l′ i )I i=1 has the downward-sloping li > xk′ xki i l′ i for all i implies that n Y i=1 pki li pk′ i l′ i ≤ 1. The precise property of datasets we are interested in can be called the Strong Axiom of Revealed Additively Separable Utility: Any balanced sequence of pairs has the risk-neutral downward-sloping prop- erty. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Additively Separable Utility is a test for whether a dataset is UAS -rational. Theorem 2. A dataset is UAS rational if and only if it satisfies the Strong Axiom of Revealed Additively Separable Utility I shall not prove Theorem 2, or any other results stated in this survey, but a proof can be obtained easily using the technique applied to prove Theorem 3 below.5 separability is treated in Varian (1983a) and Quah (2014). I should also note that more general notions of The role of a balanced sequence of pairs in Theorem 2 needs to be explained. Consider the diagram on the right of Figure 1. It depicts a dataset with two observations, (p1, x1) and (p2, x2), that violate the 4I use the term "downward-sloping demand" for lack of a better one. The prices and quantities that are being compared correspond to different goods (or states, or time-periods in later interpretations). In contrast, the term is most often used to describe a comparative statics property of demand, not how prices and quantities compare at a given price vector. 5See the references cited for Theorem 3. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 11 weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP). Hence it cannot be ratio- nalized by any utility function, let alone by a member of UAS . Theo- rem 2 implies that this dataset must exhibit some kind of violation of downward-sloping demand. If we had a single observation: K = 1, then our discussion of downward-sloping demand is straightforward: u′(xl) ity implies that quantities and prices must move in opposite directions. u′(xl′ ) = pl and concav- pl′ In each of the two observations on the right of Figure 1 we have that good one is cheaper than good two, and sure enough the chosen con- sumption bundle involves larger quantities of good one. Thus each observation alone is UAS -rational. However, when there is more than one observation in a dataset, it is possible to "mix and match" pairs from different observations. In particular, in Figure 1 we have x1 1 > x2 1 and x2 2 > x1 2 while p1 1 p2 1 p2 2 x1 2 > 1. In this sense, the data violates the downward-sloping demand property. The sequence of pairs (x1 2) is balanced, and it contradicts the downward-sloping demand condition. 1), (x2 1, x2 2, x1 The source of this imposition on the data is again the first-order condition u′(xl) utility function that satisfies this first-order condition. Then we would . If the data were UAS -rational we would need a u′(xl′ ) = pl pl′ have to have 1 ≥ u′(x1 1) u′(x2 1) u′(x2 2) u′(x1 2) = p1 l p2 1 p2 2 p1 2 , which is violated by the data in Figure 1. "Mix and match" is where the balancedness of sequences comes in. For the theory to have definitive implications on the relation between quantity and price, we need to include k on the left of a pair exactly as many times as we include it on the right.6 6The axioms in Fudenberg et al. (2014) present similar issues. See also the treat- ment of additively separable utility in Fishburn (1979). 12 ECHENIQUE 4. Choice under risk and uncertainty To study choice under risk and uncertainty we think of consumption vectors x as representing state-contingent monetary payoffs. Consider a finite set S of states of the world with S = n, and interpret x = (x1, . . . , xn) ∈ Rn + as a monetary payment that depends on the state. The vector x pays xi if the i'th state occurs. Let ∆++ = {µ ∈ Rn s=1 µs = 1} denote the set of strictly positive probability measures on S. When we talk about risk, we as- ++ : Pn sume that there is given a known ("objective") probability measure over states. Risk is common in experimental designs, such as those of Choi et al. (2007), Choi et al. (2014), and Halevy et al. (2018). 7 In situations of uncertainty, in contrast, there is no given proba- bility measure. Instead, we shall let the probabilities form part of the preferences that should be explaining the data. Uncertainty is of course prevalent in data from the field. Many lab experiments induce an objective probability, for example Choi et al. (2007) and Choi et al. (2014). There are, however, experimental designs with uncertainty, such as Hey & Pace (2014) and Echenique et al. (2019a). 4.1. Risk: Expected utility. Suppose that a probability measure µ∗ ∈ ∆++ is given and known. Think of µ∗ as an "objective" proba- bility; one resulting from a known and objective randomization device. Such devices are regularly used in laboratory experiments, and the re- sult that I am about to present is applicable to data drawn from such laboratory experiments.8 Let UEU be the class of utility functions U : Rn + → R for which there exists a concave and strictly increasing u : R+ → R such that 7The experimental literature on risk and uncertainty is extensive. See the recent survey by Trautmann & van de Kuilen (2015). I restrict attention to experiments that produce the type of datasets assumed in this survey. That is, experimental designs that focus on choices from budgets. 8See Echenique et al. (2018) for an application of this theory to experimental data. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 13 U(x) ≥ U(y) if and only if X su(xs) ≥ X µ∗ µ∗ su(ys). s∈S s∈S In studies of objective expected utility, the concept of price-probability s /µ∗ s = pk ratios, or "risk-neutral prices," is crucial. Risk-neutral prices are de- fined as ρk s, for k ∈ K and s ∈ S. To understand the role of risk-neutral prices, note that the first-order conditions for the con- sumer's optimization problem imply that u′(xs)/u′(xs′) = ρs/ρs′. Com- pare this equation with the first-order condition for additive separa- bility in our previous discussion: after transforming prices into risk- neutral prices, the analysis can proceed exactly as in Section 3. In consequence, the relevant property is Strong Axiom of Revealed Objective Expected Utility (SAROEU): Any balanced sequence of pairs has the risk-neutral downward-sloping property. We obtain a characterization of UEU -rational datasets. Theorem 3. A dataset is UEU rational if and only if it satisfies SAROEU. Theorem 3 is due to Kubler et al. (2014). The appendix to Echenique & Saito (2015) considers a hybrid case, where some states have subjective and known probabilities, while others do not. The hybrid case is impor- tant to cover data from experiments like those of Ahn et al. (2014) and Bossaerts et al. (2010). 4.2. Uncertainty: Subjective Expected Utility. We shall be in- terested in the theory of subjective expected utility, the most commonly used theory of choice under uncertainty. Let USEU be the class of utility functions U : Rn + → R for which there exists µ ∈ ∆++ and a concave and strictly increasing u : R+ → R such that U(x) ≥ U(y) if and only if X µsu(xs) ≥ X µsu(ys). s∈S s∈S 14 ECHENIQUE Here µ is interpreted as a subjective belief over states, while u is a concave utility function over money. The assumption that u is concave means that I restrict attention to risk-averse consumers.9 With subjective expected utility, the relevant first-order condition is that µsu′(xs) µs′u′(xs′) = ps ps′ . A dataset like the one with x on the left of Figure 1 is USEU -rational because an agent might choose to consume more in the more expensive state because she thinks it is the more likely state. We do not have access to probabilities, which leaves us with fewer constraints than in UEU : probabilities may be adjusted in constructing a rationalizing member of USEU . of Figure 2. So what are the USEU -rational data? Consider the data on the left It is easy to see that the data is not UAS-rational, but that does not help us very much because UAS is a more restrictive theory than USEU . It is also easy to see that the data satisfies the weak axiom of revealed preference, and is therefore rational for some utility function (it is ULNS -rational). Of course, this does not tell us whether the rationalizing utility could be a member of USEU . The way to make progress turns out to be to consider the 45-degree line. Suppose that the dataset in Figure 2 were USEU -rational. The ratio- nalizing utility would then satisfy the tangency properties at x1 and x2 depicted in the diagram on the right of Figure 2. The tangencies ex- press the first-order conditions I have been talking about. Now consider the indifference curve at x2, and follow it until it crosses the 45-degree line. At the crossing point, the tangent line to the indifference curve must be flatter than the tangent line at x2: a line that coincides with the budget line at x2. The reason for why it is flatter is that x2 lies above the 45-degree line. On the other hand, and symmetrically, the 9For an analysis that avoids the concavity assumption, see Section 4.4. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 15 x2 x2 x2 x1 x2 x1 x1 x1 Figure 2. Violation of subjective expected utility indifference curve at x1 has a tangent at the 45-degree line that is steeper than the budget line at x1. Since the prices at x1 imply a steeper budget line than at x2, we are forced to conclude that the tangent, on the 45-degree line, to the indifference curve passing through x1 is steeper than the same tangent for the indifference curve passing through x2. So the existence of a rationalizing member of USEU implies that the tangent to the lower indifference curve at the 45-degree line is steeper than that at the higher indifference curve. That is, however, impossible if the data is USEU -rational because anywhere on the 45-degree line we have x1 = x2, so the tangent has slope µ1✘ µ2✘ ✘✘u′(x1) ✘✘u′(x2) ✘ ✘ = µ1 µ2 . The slope of the tangent is the same anywhere on the 45-degree line, which contradicts what we just concluded from the data on Figure 2. The relevant property of the data turns out to be the following axiom. Strong Axiom of Revealed Subjective Expected Utility: Any doubly balanced sequence of pairs has the downward-sloping demand property. 16 ECHENIQUE Theorem 4. A dataset is USEU rational if and only if it satisfies the Strong Axiom of Revealed Subjective Expected Utility. Theorem 4 is due to Echenique & Saito (2015). 4.3. Uncertainty: Maxmin Expected Utility. Subjective expected utility struggles to account for the phenomenon of aversion to ambigu- ity: people seem to make choices that are inconsistent with fixed and stable subjective beliefs. Their choices seem to reflect an aversion to equating an uncertain, ambiguous, situation to one with given proba- bilistic beliefs.10 The leading theory of choice that accounts for such ambiguity aversion is (arguably) the theory of maxmin expected utility (Gilboa & Schmeidler, 1989), to which I now turn. Let UMEU be the class of utility functions U : Rn + → R for which there exists P ⊆ ∆++, nonempty, closed and convex, and a concave and strictly increasing u : R+ → R such that U(x) ≥ U(y) if and only if min{X µsu(xs) : µ ∈ P } ≥ min{X µsu(ys) : µ ∈ P }. s∈S s∈S The results on UMEU rationality require the assumption that S = 2: the set of states if two. Obviously this is a very big limitation, but the theory is still useful because many lab experiments operate with two states. So, while it would be very good to have more general results, the ones we have remain applicable to many relevant datasets.11 We shall need some additional notation. Assuming that there are only two states, let S = {1, 2}. Given is a dataset {(xk, pk) : k = 1, . . . , K}. Let K0 be the set of all k such that xk 2. Let K1 be the set of all k such that xk 2, and K2 be the set of all k such that xk 1 > xk 2. Note that [K] = K0 ∪ K1 ∪ K2. 1 = xk 1 < xk 10The evidence usually offered in support of ambiguity aversion is the Ellsberg paradox, sue to Ellsberg (1961). See Camerer & Weber (1992) for a survey. (2016a), 11Including Hey & Pace see Chambers et al. (2014), and Echenique et al. (2019a). In fact, in the experiment of Echenique et al. (2019a) there are three states, but the authors find a way to leverage the two-state result. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 17 Given a sequence of pairs (xki )I i=1, consider the following nota- tion: Let Il,s = {i : ki ∈ Kl and si = s}, I ′ i = s}, for l = 0, 1, 2 and s = 1, 2. Thus equipped, the property of interest is i ∈ Kl and s′ l,s = {i : k′ i s′ i si , xk′ Strong Axiom of Revealed Maxmin Expected Utility: Any balanced sequence of pairs (xki 0,1(cid:12)(cid:12) + (cid:12)(cid:12)I ′ (cid:12)(cid:12)I ′ 1,1(cid:12)(cid:12) = 2,1(cid:12)(cid:12) − I2,1 ≤ 0 has the downward-sloping demand property. i=1 in which I0,1 + I1,1 − (cid:12)(cid:12)I ′ )I si , xk′ i s′ i Theorem 5. A dataset is UMEU rational if and only if it satisfies the Strong Axiom of Revealed Maxmin Expected Utility. Theorem 5 is due to Chambers et al. (2016a). The theory of maxmin expected utility presents some challenges that were not present in expected utility theory. To rationalize a dataset we have the freedom of choosing different beliefs for different observations. Such freedom makes it difficult, in general, to obtain a tight axiomati- zation, but the case of two states has one significant advantage. When there are only two states, there are only two extreme points to the set of beliefs P . Moreover, depending on whether xk 1, we know which of the two extremes is relevant in explaining the choice of xk. If it is xk 2, then the relevant belief must be pessimistic about state 1. If instead xk 1 then he relevant belief must be pessimistic about state 2. Theorem 5 is made possible by this property of the 2, or xk 2 ≤ xk 1 ≤ xk 1 ≤ xk 2 ≤ xk two-state case. Chambers et al. (2016a) present a characterization of the datasets that are rationalizable by other theories of choice, including Choquet expected utility, and MEU with S > 2. These results are, however, limited to risk neutrality.12 4.4. Expected utility without risk aversion. The discussion so far has been restricted to models with risk aversion. In consequence, the tests I have presented are really joint tests of the hypotheses that an 12The methods of Polisson et al. (2017), briefly outlined below, can also be used for general theories of choice under uncertainty. 18 ECHENIQUE agent is consistent with some particular theory of choice, and that the agent is risk averse. One can, however, imagine an expected utility- rational agent, for example, failing such a test because they make choices that indicate a pure preference for taking on risks. These choices could for example be on the corners of the budget sets that they face.13 I now proceed to outline a method for testing EU (and other theories of choice under risk and uncertainty) that avoids the as- Given a dataset (xk, pk), 1 ≤ k ≤ K, let X ∗ = {xk sumption of risk aversion. The method is due to Polisson et al. (2017). s : 1 ≤ k ≤ K, 1 ≤ s ≤ n} be the set of all observed chosen consumption quantitites. Define X = {0} ∪ X ∗, and let X n denote the n-fold cartesian product X × · · · × X . A data-set (xk, pk)K k=1 is UEU -rational on the data if there exists a strictly increasing utility function u : X → R such that, for each k, xk ∈ argmax{U(x) : x ∈ B(pk, pk · xk) ∩ X n}. Testing whether a dataset is UEU -rational on the data amounts to checking whether a utility function can be constructed on finitely many points to satisfy a system of linear inequalities. It is therefore compu- tationally easy to do (there are at most (S K)2 linear inequalities to check for satisfaction). The next result is due to Polisson et al. (2017). Theorem 6. A dataset is UEU -rational if and only if it is UEU -rational on the data. The importance of Theorem 6 is that budget sets are infinite, and therefore there is in principle no computationally feasible way of check- ing UEU -rationality. The result of Polisson et al. (2017) says that such a computational method is readily available, and amounts to checking 13It is easy to generate examples of datasets that are not UEU rational as defined here, but that can be rationalized with a non-concave utility. Expected utility with risk aversion implies a normal demand function, so an example can be generated using the conditions in Cherchye et al. (2018). RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 19 whether a utility can be constructed on the data.14 The results on risk aversion that I have discussed earlier in the survey avoid the issue by using the sufficiency of first-order conditions: there are finitely many of those. The statement in Theorem 6 resembles part of Afriat's theorem, which can also be understood as saying that a dataset is rational if and only if it can be rationalized on the data.15 Polisson et. al. provide a more general set of tools than evidenced by Theorem 6. They provide a framework for testing a general class of models of choice under risk (including models of non-expected utility such as rank-dependent utility), and uncertainty -- including SEU, but also models of ambiguity aversion. For some of these models, however, computational tractability is lost. In addition to the binary pass/not-pass test I have discussed, Polis- son et. al. develop an approach to measuring the distance between the theory and a dataset. Their approach is based on adapting Afriat's critical cost efficiency index to their test. 4.5. Probabilistic sophistication. Perhaps the most basic Bayesian model of decision under uncertainty is due to Machina & Schmeidler (1992), who propose that an agent is probabilistically sophisticated if x ∈ Rn + is evaluated based on the distribution that it induces on R+, given some prior µ. That is, choices are as if there is some probability distribution µ such that x is preferred to x′ whenever the distribu- tion Fx(z) = µ({s ∈ S : xs ≤ z}) is ranked above the distribution Fx′(z) = µ({s ∈ S : x′ s ≤ z}). Probabilistic sophistication requires that the preferences over distributions respect monotonicity in first- order stochastic dominance, but imposes no additional restrictions. 14A very general result in Chambers et al. (2017) also implies that a computable test exists, but not that it is efficiently computable. 15See also Quah (2014), who presents a result that is similar in spirit, for sepa- rability in demand, and Polisson (2018) who studies additive separability without imposing concavity. 20 ECHENIQUE Formally, let UPS be the set of utility functions U : Rn + → R for which there exists µ ∈ ∆++ and a function V : D → R, where D is the set of distributions on R with finite support, and V is monotone with respect to first-order stochastic dominance, such that U(x) ≥ U(x′) iff v(Fx) ≥ V (Fx′) Epstein (2000) works out a basic implication of probabilistic sophis- tication for datasets (xk, pk). He shows that Theorem 7. If a dataset (xk, pk) 1 ≤ k ≤ K is UPS -rational then there cannot exists k, k′ ∈ {1, . . . , K} and s, t ∈ S such that t ≥ pk (1) pk (2) and xk s and pk′ t > xk s ≥ pk′ s and xk′ t , with at least one inequality being strict, s > xk′ t . The idea behind Theorem 7 is that if the agent's choices are guided t > pk by probabilities (if what matters about the choice of x is only the probability distribution over money that it induces), then pk s and xk t > xk s means that the probability of state t must be strictly greater than the probability of state s. The reason is that, when pk s , the agent could modify xk by choosing to consume xk in state s and xk t s in state t: the modified vector would cost less than xk, and therefore be affordable. For the modified vector not to first-order stochastically dominate xk, the state t must be more likely than s. Now, of course, having made that inference based on observation (xk, pk), it should not be contradicted by observation (xk′, pk′). t > pk Theorem 7 provides a necessary condition for a dataset to be UPS - rational. It is an open problem to establish a necessary and sufficient condition (a "revealed preference characterization") for probabilistic sophistication. A natural question is whether probabilistic sophistica- tion can be distinguished empirically from the more stringent theory of subjective expected utility; this question is answered in the affirmative RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 21 by Echenique & Saito (2015), who exhibit an example of a dataset that is UPS -rational but not USEU -rational.16 5. Intertemporal choice: exponential discounting I shall be interested in the theory of exponentially discounted utility, the most widely applied theory of intertemporal choice. Let UEDU be the class of utility functions U : RT + → R for which there exists δ ∈ (0, 1] and u : R+ → R such that U(x) ≥ U(y) if and only if X δtu(xt) ≥ X δtu(yt) t∈T t∈T Note that, while they are meant to be applied to different envi- ronments, UEDU ⊆ USEU . So the axiom that characterizes UEDU - rationality has to be more stringent than the Strong Axiom of Revealed Subjective Expected Utility.17 In fact, instead of a doubly-balanced se- quence we shall count time periods on the left and on the right of each pair in the sequence. Strong Axiom of Revealed Exponentially Discounted Utility: Any balanced sequence of pairs (xki i, i=1 t′ has the downward-sloping demand property. i=1 for which PI )I i=1 ti ≥ PI ti , xk′ i t′ i The Strong Axiom of Revealed Exponentially Discounted Utility has a simple explanation. Suppose, for example, that one observation in the dataset satisfies xk 2, meaning that the consumer chooses larger consumption in period 4 than in period 3. This can only be compatible 3 > xk with discounted utility (which implies an impatient consumer) if con- sumption in period 4 is cheaper than in period 3. In contrast, xk 2 > xk 3 is possible regardless of how prices compare, because the consumer's discount factor could account for her desire to consume early, even 16In the case of risk, with objectively known probabilities, a test of monotonicity with respect to first-order stochastic dominance is developed by Nishimura et al. (2017) and implemented by Polisson et al. (2017). 17In the intertemporal context, USEU is comprised of utilities with the form D(t)u(xt), where D(t) > 0 is a general discount function. Pt 22 ECHENIQUE i says that ti occur later in time than the quantities . If, in any pair, the former are always lager than the latter, the when it is more expensive. More generally, Pn the consumption quantities xki xk′ only explanation must be a corresponding movement in prices. i t′ i i=1 ti ≥ Pn i=1 t′ The result, obtained in Echenique et al. (2019b), is that: Theorem 8. A dataset is UEDU rational if and only if it satisfies Strong Axiom of Revealed Exponentially Discounted Utility. It is possible to obtain many results in the same spirit as Theorem 8. Echenique et al. (2019b) gives revealed preference axioms for many other theories of intertemporal choice, including quasi-hyperbolic dis- counting, and monotone time discounting. Echenique et. al. implement these tests on data drawn from experiments by Andreoni & Sprenger (2012) and Carvalho et al. (2016). There is a long literature on the testable implications of models of intertemporal choice. I want to mention two papers that follow in the revealed preference tradition. Dziewulski (2018) also considers ex- ponentially discounted utility and its generalizations, but focuses on datasets that arise from pairwise comparisons; not choice from budgets. Adams et al. (2014) is a study of intertemporal choice and dynamic consistency, but their analysis of household consumption is outside the (narrow) scope of my survey. 6. Multiple physical goods One of the limitations of the results we have presented is that they are restricted to the case of a single physical good ("money") in each time period or state. As a consequence, the results are applicable to common economic environments where agents choose dated, or state- contingent, monetary payoffs. It is, however, easy to envision economic applications with multiple physical goods, and where the multiplicity is a crucial component of the environment. An important application is to data from consumption surveys, where an agent or a household, records RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 23 their purchases of multiple consumption goods over time. The methods I have discussed so far would require that one aggregate the multiple goods into one. Such aggregation is complicated, both conceptually and practically.18 I shall briefly outline some revealed-preference studies that avoid the assumption of a single physical goods. 6.1. Risk. Suppose that there are L physical goods, and S states of the world. Consumption space is therefore RLS + , with n = LS being the number of goods. As in Section 4.1, suppose given a probability measure µ∗ ∈ ∆++ ⊆ RS +. Let UEU be the class of utility functions U : RLS + → R for which there exists a concave and strictly increasing u : RL + → R such that U(x) ≥ U(y) iff X su(xs) ≥ X µ∗ µ∗ su(ys). s∈S s∈S A data set is, again, a collection (xk, pk), 1 ≤ k ≤ K. It is now s ∈ + : 1 ≤ k ≤ K, 1 ≤ s ≤ S}. Denote by ∆(X ) the set of all probability useful to collect all the observed quantities in a set: Let X = {xk RL distributions on X (a finite set). Recall at this point the revealed preference binary relations I intro- duced in Section 2.2.1. We shall need to consider new revealed pref- erence relations on ∆(X ), but these build on RP and P P . Say that x RC z if there exists z′ ∈ ∆(X ) such that x RP z′, and that z is a mean-preferving spread of z′. Similarly, say that x P C z if there exists 18That said, most revealed preference studies of data from consumption surveys do some sort of aggregation. Different kinds of meat or cheese are comprised into aggregate "meat good," "cheese good," and so on. See Chambers & Echenique (2016) for an overview of this issue. 24 ECHENIQUE z′ ∈ ∆(X ) such that x P P z′, and z is a mean-preserving spread of z′.19 Next, Theorem 9 is a composite of contributions by Varian (1983b), Green & Srivastava (1986), and Chambers et al. (2016b).20 Theorem 9. The following statements are equivalent: (1) For any sequence {zk}K k=1 in ∆(X ) with xk RC zk, and any + with Pk πk = 1, if Pk πkxk = Pk πkzk, then vector π ∈ RK πk = 0 for all k with xk P C zk. (2) For all functions hk s : K × S → R+ with the property that s = X µ∗ X s (k′, s′) = X hk X hk′ s′ (k, s) k′ s′ k′ s′ for all k and s, s (k′, s′)xk′ xk RP (Pk′ Ps′ hk µ∗ s s′ )s for all k implies that it is not the case that xk P P (X X hk s (k′, s′) k′ s′ xk′ s′ µ∗ s )s for some k. (3) There exists U k s ≥ 0 and λk > 0 such that U k s ≤ U k′ s′ + λk′ pk′ s′ s πs′ (xk s − xk′ s′ ) (4) The data is UEU -rational. Statement (3) provides Afriat inequalities for the problem at hand. The equivalence between (3) and (4) is due to Varian (1983b) and Green & Srivastava (1986). The rest of Theorem 9 is due to Chambers et al. (2016b). 19The idea of "composing" the revealed preference relation with a given (fixed) binary relation to reflect a monotonicity property is common in revealed prefer- ence theory. See, for example, Chambers & Echenique (2009) and Nishimura et al. (2017). 20See also Diewert (2012) and Varian (1988). RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 25 The property in Statement (1) is a revealed-preference axiom similar to Fishburn's (Fishburn, 1975), but in the consumption theory context. The axiom is a simple consequence of UEU -rationality: If each xk is re- vealed preferred to zk, and we take a convex combination of the x's and the z's that yield identical lotteries, then the convex combination can- not place positive weight on any xk that is strictly revealed preferred to the corresponding zk. Put differently, if I have two ways of compos- ing the same (reduced) lottery, one with support in the xks and the other with support in the zks, the first collection of lotteries cannot all be better than the second collection, with some of them being strictly better. It is easy to see that this property (1) is implied by EU. What is surprising here is that it is also sufficient for UEU -rationality. It may be of interest to see that the property in Statement (1) implies GARP. Suppose given a sequence of observations xki, 1 ≤ M (M ≥ 2), with xki RP xki+1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ M − 1, and xkM P P xk1. Then letting zki = zki+1 (using summation mod M), and a uniform distribution over the xki and zki gives a violation of Statement (1). The property in Statement (2) results from applying linear pro- gramming duality to the system of Afriat inequalities in (3). Since s = Pk′ Ps′ hk µ∗ s can be thought of as pro- viding mean preserving spreads. Then (1) can be reduced to (1): s(k′, s′), the function hk see Chambers et al. (2016b) for details. The equivalence between (2) and (3) is a matter of Farkas lemma (see Chambers & Echenique (2016) for an exposition of this methodology as it applies to revealed prefer- ence theory). 6.2. Intertemporal choice. I now turn to intertemporal choice with multiple physical goods, and present a result due to Martin Browning. The model is restricted to a dataset with K = 1. That is, with a single observation. We call such datasets survey data because they are common in cross-sectional consumption surveys. 26 ECHENIQUE A survey dataset (x, p) = ((xt)T t=1, (pt)T t=1) satisfies cyclic monotonic- ity if, for any sequence of observations, (xti, pti)M i=1 M X i=1 pti · (xti+1 − xti) ≤ 0, where we are employing addition mod M in the calculation of subinde- ces of t. Let UNDU be the set of all utility functions U such that U(x1, . . . , xT ) = T X t=1 u(xt), where u : RL + → R is continuous and concave. The next result is due to Browning (1989). Theorem 10. A survey dataset (a dataset with K = 1) is UNDU ra- tional if and only if it satisfies cyclic monotonicity. The idea behind Theorem 10 is simple. Suppose, for the sake of exposition, that a rationalizing u is differentiable. Then the first-order condition that a UNDU rational dataset must satisfy is Du(xt) = λpt, 1 ≤ t ≤ T. This means that 1/λpt must constitute the values of the gradient of a concave funciton. It is well known that cyclic monotonicity character- izes the gradients of concave functions (see Rockafellar (1997)). Crawford (2010) generalizes the ideas in Browning (1989) to study a model with exponential discount and habit formation. See also Demuynck & Verriest (2013) for a revealed preference analysis of habit- forming durable goods. 7. Conclusion Revealed preference theory has traditionally explored the empirical content of the theory of optimizing behavior. An emergent literature has extended the theory to cover specific functional forms that are important in specific economic environments. In this survey, I have RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 27 reviewed the recent literature focused on the economic environments of risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice. The last five years have seen significant advances in our understanding of the empirical content of some of the most widely used models of choice for such environments. These theoretical advances are mirrored in the emergence of novel experimental designs for choice under economic budget sets. The re- sulting experimental datasets provide an excellent opportunity for test- ing important economic theories under controlled conditions and weak assumptions. My survey has focused on theoretical results, but several recent papers have used the revealed-preference tests developed in the theoretical work, and applied them to experimental data. References Adams A, Cherchye L, De Rock B, Verriest E. 2014. Consume now or later? time inconsistency, collective choice, and revealed preference. American Economic Review 104:4147 -- 83 Afriat SN. 1967. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International Economic Review 8:67 -- 77 Ahn D, Choi S, Gale D, Kariv S. 2014. Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quantitative Economics 5:195 -- 223 Andreoni J, Sprenger C. 2012. Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review 102:3333 -- 3356 Blundell RW, Browning M, Crawford IA. 2003. Nonparametric engel curves and revealed preference. Econometrica 71:205 -- 240 Bossaerts P, Ghirardato P, Guarnaschelli S, Zame WR. 2010. Ambigu- ity in asset markets: Theory and experiment. Review of Financial Studies 23:1325 -- 1359 Browning M. 1989. A nonparametric test of the life-cycle rational ex- pectations hypothesis. International Economic Review 30:979 -- 992 Camerer C, Weber M. 1992. Recent developments in modeling prefer- ences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:325 -- 370 28 ECHENIQUE Carvajal A, Ray I, Snyder S. 2004. Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: testable restrictions and identification. Journal of Math- ematical Economics 40:1 -- 40. Aggregation, Equilibrium and Ob- servability in honor of Werner Hildenbrand Carvalho L, Meier S, Wang SW. 2016. Poverty and economic decision making: Evidence from changes in financial resources at payday. American Economic Review 106:260 -- 284 Chambers CP, Echenique F. 2009. Supermodularity and preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 144:1004 -- 1014 Chambers CP, Echenique F. 2016. Revealed preference theory, vol. 56. Cambridge University Press Chambers CP, Echenique F, Saito K. 2016a. Testing theories of finan- cial decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 113:4003 -- 4008 Chambers CP, Echenique F, Shmaya E. 2014. The axiomatic structure of empirical content. American Economic Review 104:2303 -- 19 Chambers CP, Echenique F, Shmaya E. 2017. General revealed prefer- ence theory. Theoretical Economics 12:493 -- 511 Chambers CP, Liu C, Martinez SK. 2016b. A test for risk-averse ex- pected utility. Journal of Economic Theory 163:775 -- 785 Cherchye L, Crawford I, De Rock B, Vermeulen F. 2009. The revealed preference approach to demand. In Quantifying Consumer Prefer- ences: Estimating Demand Systems, ed. D Slottje, Contributions to Economic Analysis. Emerald Press, 247 -- 280 Cherchye L, Demuynck T, Rock BD. 2018. Normality of demand in a two-goods setting. Journal of Economic Theory 173:361 -- 382 Choi S, Fisman R, Gale D, Kariv S. 2007. Consistency and heterogene- ity of individual behavior under uncertainty. American Economic Review 97:1921 -- 1938 Choi S, Kariv S, Muller W, Silverman D. 2014. Who is (more) rational? American Economic Review 104:1518 -- 1550 RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 29 Crawford I. 2010. Habits revealed. The Review of Economic Studies 77:1382 -- 1402 Crawford I, De Rock B. 2014. Empirical revealed preference. Annual Review of Economics 6:503 -- 524 Debreu G. 1959. Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Yale University Press Demuynck T, Verriest E. 2013. Ill never forget my first cigarette: a revealed preference analysis of the habits as durables model. Inter- national Economic Review 54:717 -- 738 Diewert WE. 1973. Afriat and revealed preference theory. The Review of Economic Studies 40:419 -- 425 Diewert WE. 2012. Afriat's theorem and some extensions to choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 122:305 -- 331 Dziewulski P. 2018. Revealed time preference. Games and Economic Behavior 112:67 -- 77 Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K. 2018. Approximate expected utility ra- tionalization. Caltech SS Working Paper 1441 Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K. 2019a. Decision making under uncer- tainty: An experimental study in market settings. Mimeo, California Institute of Technology Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K. 2019b. Testable implications of models of intertemporal choice: Exponential discounting and its generaliza- tions. Caltech SS Working Paper 1388 Echenique F, Saito K. 2015. Savage in the market. Econometrica 83:1467 -- 1495 Ellsberg D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quar- terly Journal of Economics 75:643 -- 669 Epstein LG. 2000. Are probabilities used in markets? Journal of Eco- nomic Theory 91:86 -- 90 Fishburn PC. 1975. Separation theorems and expected utilities. Journal of Economic Theory 11:16 -- 34 Fishburn PC. 1979. Utility theory for decision making. Krieger 30 ECHENIQUE Fudenberg D, Iijima R, Strzalecki T. 2014. Stochastic choice and re- vealed perturbed utility. Mimeo, Harvard University Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. 1989. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18:141 -- 153 Green RC, Srivastava S. 1986. Expected utility maximization and de- mand behavior. Journal of Economic Theory 38:313 -- 323 Halevy Y, Persitz D, Zrill L. 2018. Parametric recoverability of prefer- ences. Journal of Political Economy 126:1558 -- 1593 Hansen LP, Sargent TJ. 2008. Robustness. Princeton university press Hey J, Pace N. 2014. The explanatory and predictive power of non two-stage-probability theories of decision making under ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 49:1 -- 29 Houthakker H. 1950. Revealed preference and the utility function. Eco- nomica 17:159 -- 174 Kubler F, Selden L, Wei X. 2014. Asset demand based tests of expected utility maximization. American Economic Review 104:3459 -- 80 Machina MJ, Schmeidler D. 1992. A more robust definition of subjec- tive probability. Econometrica :745 -- 780 Matzkin RL. 1994. Restrictions of economic theory in nonparametric methods. Handbook of econometrics 4:2523 -- 2558 Matzkin RL, Richter MK. 1991. Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory 53:287 -- 303 Nishimura H, Ok EA, Quah J. 2017. A comprehensive approach to revealed preference theory. American Economic Review 107:1239 -- 63 Polisson M. 2018. A lattice test for additive separability. IFS Working Paper W18-08 Polisson M, Quah J, Renou L. 2017. Revealed preferences over risk and uncertainty. University of St. Andrews School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper No. 1706 Quah J. 2014. A test for weakly separable preferences. Tech. rep., De- partment of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 708, University of Oxford. RISK, UNCERTAINTY, INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE 31 Rockafellar RT. 1997. Convex analysis. Princeton university press Samuelson P. 1938. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica 5:61 -- 71 Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G. 2015. Ambiguity attitudes. In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, eds. G Keren, G Wu. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 89 -- 116 Varian H. 2006. Revealed preference. Samuelsonian economics and the twenty-first century :99 -- 115 Varian HR. 1982. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica :945 -- 973 Varian HR. 1983a. Nonparametric tests of consumer behaviour. The Review of Economic Studies 50:99 -- 110 Varian HR. 1983b. Nonparametric tests of models of investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 18:269 -- 278 Varian HR. 1988. Estimating risk aversion from Arrow-Debreu portfolio choice. Econometrica 56:973 -- 979
1809.06770	2	1809	2018-10-17T01:27:56	Selling Information	[ "econ.TH" ]	I consider the monopolistic pricing of informational good. A buyer's willingness to pay for information is from inferring the unknown payoffs of actions in decision making. A monopolistic seller and the buyer each observes a private signal about the payoffs. The seller's signal is binary and she can commit to sell any statistical experiment of her signal to the buyer. Assuming that buyer's decision problem involves rich actions, I characterize the profit maximizing menu. It contains a continuum of experiments, each containing different amount of information. I also find a complementarity between buyer's private information and information provision: when buyer's private signal is more informative, the optimal menu contains more informative experiments.	econ.TH	econ	Selling Information ∗ Weijie Zhong† Match, 2016 Abstract. I consider the monopolistic pricing of informational good. A buyer's will- ingness to pay for information is from inferring the unknown payoffs of actions in decision making. A monopolistic seller and the buyer each observes a private signal about the payoffs. The seller's signal is binary and she can commit to sell any statis- tical experiment of her signal to the buyer. Assuming that buyers decision problem involves rich actions, I characterize the profit maximizing menu. It contains a con- tinuum of experiments, each containing different amount of information. I also find a complementarity between buyers private information and information provision: when buyers private signal is more informative, the optimal menu contains more in- formative experiments. Keywords: information design, mechanism design, monopoly pricing JEL classification: D42, D82, D83 1 Introduction When an individual is making decision involving unknown payoffs, he often has the opportunity to acquire information to learn the payoffs. For example, an investor is choosing from a set of assets, whose returns are unknown. The investor can learn about the assets returns from multiple information sources: his own knowledge about the market, advices from financial consultants, articles on The Wall Street Journal, etc. Interestingly, the external information providers tend to offer increasingly richer menus of personalized options of information. For example, The Wall Street Jour- nal and Bloomberg Businessweek are providing pay-by-article services through on- line platforms; the Amazon Web Services provides complicated pricing schedules for its cloud services. Meanwhile, although the menu is rich, each options provided in the menu are usually simple -- in previous examples of journal articles and data services they are often simple partial revelations of the complete information available from the information provider. In this paper, those rich but simple menus of informational goods are justified as the revenue maximizing menus for the information seller, when the buyer has other private information sources unknown to the seller. I model the buyer (he) of informa- tion as a decision maker who is choosing from actions with unknown payoffs. The buyer and the seller (she) each observes a private signal about the payoffs. The seller ∗I thank Alessandro Bonatti, Yeon-Koo Che, Navin Kartik, Qingmin Liu, Konrad Mierendorff, Mike Riordan for helpful comments and suggestions. I also want to thank seminar participants at Columbia University Micro Theory Colloquium and CRETA at University of Warwick. All errors are mine. †Department of Economics, Columbia University, Email: [email protected] 1 can costlessly produce any product that contains weakly less information than she owns, i.e. any signal structure that depends on her own signal. The contents of the signal structure is contractible. The buyers willingness to pay for information depends on both the buyers private signal and the informational good. The sellers revenue maximization problem is formulated as a nonlinear pricing problem, where the seller elicits buyers private signal using a menu of information-price pairs. The nonlinear pricing problem has been extensively studied when seller is only de- signing a one-dimensional "quantity" or "quality" of the good (Mirrlees (1971), Mussa & Rosen (1978), Maskin & Riley (1984)). In contrast, this paper considers informational good, whose dimensionality is infinite. Moreover, the space is not well-ordered -- al- though all buyer types agree that full revelation is the best and no information is the worst, there is no consensus which of two generic signal structure is better among buyers with different private signals. I fully characterize the revenue-maximizing menu in the case that: 1) sellers private signal is binary 2) buyers decision problem involves a rich set of actions. I first show that the revenue-maximizing menu contains only "simple" signal structures. Each signal structure in the menu has only two possible realizations: one perfectly reveals one of sellers signal, and the other partially reveals the sellers other signal. Second, the optimal menu contains a continuum of signal structures. Since each signal structure reveals one of the sellers signal, the menu can be divided into two classes of signal structures, each fully revealing one of the sellers signal. All signal structures in each class are ordered by Blackwell informativeness. In equilibrium, the buyer purchases a signal structure that reveals the ex ante less likely signal (according to buyers private belief), namely he purchases contradictory information. The more certain the buyer is about the sellers signal, the less information he purchases. The profitability of a rich menu of signal structures can be seen by considering the buyers willingness to pay for signal structures. Restrict the consideration to the "simple" signal structures. Consider the "Diff-in-diff" of utility from two signal struc- ture with different informativeness for two buyer types. Hypothetically assume that a same action is optimally chosen when observing the partially revealing signal by both buyer types with both signal structures. When this action involves few risk, i.e. the payoffs of the action is almost the same as the counterfactual optimal action following the other signal, the DID is almost zero. Otherwise when this action involves high risk, the DID is large. This DID is in fact the amount of rent that can be extracted (locally) from the type that values information more. Therefore, inducing the buyers with less sure prior (interpreted as the "high type" in standard nonlinear pricing framework) to purchase the signals that induces riskier action is relaxing the incentive compati- bility constraint, comparing to a flat-price menu. In my setup where buyers decision problem is rich, such effect generically exists and a rich menu is optimal. In Section 5, I study the comparative statics when the buyers private signal be- comes more informative. In this case, a buyer of a given private belief about sell- ers information purchases a more informative signal structure under the new optimal menu. This suggests that the monopolistic provision of information is complementary to the private information the buyer owns. 2 Related literatures My paper is built on the literature studying nonlinear pricing. It differs from classi- cal works including Mirrlees (1971), Mussa & Rosen (1978) and Maskin & Riley (1984) in the generality of available contracts for the seller. As a nature property of infor- mational goods, I allow the monopoly seller to include any Blackwell experiments in the menu, instead of a one-dimensional quantity or quality. On the other hand, this paper also differs from the set of papers studying mechanism design with fully gen- eral space of contracts (e.g. Noldeke & Samuelson (2018)). Utilizing special properties of informational good, I am able to get full characterization of revenue maximizing mechanism, as opposed to only existence results or partial characterizations in this literature. My paper is closely related to the literature on selling information. It focuses on uncertainty about a payoff relevant state and heterogeneity in decision maker's belief (or equivalent buyer's private signal). Horner & Skrzypacz (2011) focus on informa- tion provider with private type (competent or not) and derived a gradual persuasion rule as the optimal disclosure of private information. Bergemann & Bonatti (2013) spent one section on optimal non-linear pricing mechanism for selling consumer level matching value data. Eso & Szentes (2007) studied a model with seller controlling re- lease of payoff relevant state. The seller can contract on the action of decision maker. My approach is different in the modeling of the informational good. I embedded the general definition of decision problem and information defined in Blackwell et al. (1951) into a monopoly pricing problem. The paper closest to mine is Bergemann et al. (2014), which also studies optimal menu of Blackwell experiments. Bergemann et al. (2014) provide a partial character- ization of the signal structures in the optimal menu in a general setup (general state and action spaces), and a full characterization of the optimal menu with binary states and actions. My paper complements theirs in providing the full characterization with binary states and general action spaces. I show that when the action space is rich, the revenue maximizing menu contains a very rich set of different signal structures, as opposed to flat-pricing being optimal when action is binary in Bergemann et al. (2014). There has been a large literature studying the value of information. Starting from Blackwell et al. (1951), a general fair price is proved to be impossible to determine. Cabrales et al. (2010) shows that the Entropy function can be used to order information for a specific class of investment problem. Moscarini & Smith (2002) prices informa- tion as an coefficient determining asymptotic value of repeated experiments. In my approach, I fix the decision problem but allow general prior beliefs. Also I am trying to find optimal monopoly prices instead of fair prices. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, I set up the revenue max- imization problem. In Section 3, I characterize the revenue maximizing menu of signal structures. In Section 4, I introduce the methodology for solving the optimal menu. In Section 5, I provide comparative statics on the distribution of buyer's beliefs. In Sec- tion 5, I provide numerical examples to visualize my results. I conclude in Section 6 Technical proofs omitted in the paper are provided in the Appendix. 3 2 Setup In this section, I set up a general model of nonlinear pricing of information. Decision problem: The buyer of information is choosing an action a P A. The payoff of each action upa, xq depends on a state x P X. The buyer and seller have common prior belief of the state distribution πX P ∆pXq . Private information: Buyer and seller observes private signal tB P TB and tS P TS. tB and tS are jointly distributed according to a distribution πptS, tBxq. I assume that tS involves two realizations and is a sufficient statistic for tB with respect to x, namely the seller of information knows more than the buyer about the payoff relevant state. Signal structure: The seller can contract on the provision of a signal structure, defined as a pair pS, gq. S is the set of signal realizations and gpstsq : TS Ñ ∆pSq is the conditional distribution of signal. A signal structure pS, gq reports seller's private signal tS with some noise. Notice that it is without loss of generality to assume that all signal structures share the same signal set S. As a result each signal structure can be represented by only g. Each contract specifies a pair pg, pq, the signal structure g and corresponding price p. Timing of the game: 0) Nature draws a state x according to πX. 1) Before any signal jPJ. (j is a not necessarily is revealed, the seller specifies a menu of contracts countable general index) 2) The private signals tS and tB are realized according to π. 3) Buyer chooses an utility maximizing contract j based on his private signal tB. 4) Signal s is realized according to gj, and buyer picks an optimal action based on both tB and s. gj, pj The nonlinear pricing problem is formulated as a two-step optimization problem. The first step is solving buyer's optimal choice of contract given a menu. The second step is solving the seller's revenue maximizing menu. 2.1 Buyer's problem function apsq : S TB Ñ A that maximize: Given a signal structure gj and private signal tB, buyer's optimal choice rule is a (cid:32) ( ż sup aps,tBq Define Upgj, tBq as: upapsq, xqgjpstSqπptS, tBxqπXpxqds, tS, x ş ş upapsq, xqgjpstSqπptS, tBxqπXpxqds, tS, x πptS, tBxqπXpxqdtS, x UpgjtBq " supaps,tBq UpgjtBq is the conditional utility from observing the signal structure gj. To capture the outside optimal of observing no information, let gH be the null signal structure and pH " 0. Then, given a menu pgj, pjq, buyer's optimal choice rule is a function ιptBq : TB Ñ J Ť tHu that maximize: UpgιptBq, tBq ´ pιptBq πptBxqπXpxqdtB, x ż` sup ιptBq 4 2.2 Seller's problem Given buyer's optimal choice rule, the seller's optimization problem is: sup pgj,pjq s.t. ş` pιptBqπptB, xqπXpxqdtB, x ιptBq P arg max UpgιptBq, tBq ´ pιptBq pH " 0 and gH is null signal structure πptBxqπXpxqdtB, x (P) ż # ż ş 2.3 A belief based representation Since by assumption tS is a sufficient statistics for tB with respect to x, conditional on knowing tS the information contained in tB is irrelevant. Therefore Probpxs, tBq " ProbpxtSqProbptSs, tBq. Letrupa, tSq " upa, xqProbpxtSq, then ş ż rupaps, tBq, tSqProbptSs, tBqdtS Upgj, tBq " sup aps,tBq upaps, tBq, xqProbpxs, tBqdx " sup aps,tBq ş ş Meanwhile, the seller's objective function in Equation (P) is suppgj,pjq and buyer's objective function is maxι don not explicitly involves state x. pιptBqProbptBqdtB, pUpgι, tBq´ pιqProbptBqdtB. These two formula ru to replace The previous analysis suggests that in the formulation of Equation (P), in fact both buyer and seller's objective function does not explicitly involve state x once we use upa, xqProbpxtSq. So the whole nonlinear pricing problem Equation (P) can actually be reformulated as a problem where tS is directly the payoff relevant state. Two buyer's signals tB differs in term of buyer's choice of menu only if they induce dif- ferent beliefs about the distribution of tS. So buyer's private signal can be equivalently summarized as his private belief about seller's signal. Here I represent an equivalent belief based representation of the problem: Seller's signal tS can be either h or l. Let µ be buyer's private belief of seller's type being h. Let Vpµq " supa Eµrrupa, tSqs. Given gjpshqµ`gjpslqp1´µq by Bayes rule. Then it is obvious that Vppµpµ, s, gjqq is the pµpµ, s, gjq " " Vppµpµ, s, gjqq maximal expected utility from choosing the optimal action conditional on observing " Upgj, µq. Invoke the revelation principle, the nonlin- signal s and Es ear pricing problem can be written as seller choosing direct mechanism M " gµ, pµ to maximize: each signal structure gj, buyer's posterior belief observation signal realization s is gjpshqµ ` ‰ ż 1 " " ` pµ fpµqdµ ` V V µpµ, s, gµq µpµ, s, gµq ‰ ‰ " ´ pµ ě Es V ´ pµ ě Vpµq maxM 0 s.t. Es Es ` ‰ µpµ, s, gµ1q ´ pµ1 (1) (IC) (IR) Equation (1) is formulated as a standard nonlinear pricing problem, except for that the seller is choosing a signal distribution gµ for each buyer, as opposed to one dimen- sional quantity or quality in the canonical models. It is worth noticing that apart from the contract space, the type space is also non- standard. Consider for example a fully revealing signal structure. The buyer with ex 5 ante very imprecise signal has the highest willingness to pay for the signal structure. Therefore, in the belief space r0, 1s, they types are nor linearly ordered. In this paper, I overcome the difficulties brought by the infinite dimensional contract space and non- ordered type space, by showing that 1) it is without loss of optimality to consider a one-dimensional contract space (i.e. the "simple" signal structures). 2) the type space can be divided into two subsets, on each of with types are linearly ordered. 3 Characterization of the Optimal Menu 3.1 The role of rich actions In this section, I use a simple example to illustrate why a rich menu of signal struc- tures can improve upon the flat-price strategy. First, consider the seller's revenue from selling the fully revealing signal structure at a flat price. The buyer's utility gain from this signal structure given private belief µ is coVpµq (coV is the upper con- cave hull of V defined as in Kamenica & Gentzkow (2009)). Therefore, given price p, all buyer types with coVpµq ´ Vpµq ě p purchases the signal. The revenue is p ProbpcoFpµq ´ Vpµq ě pq. The optimal choice of price maximizes the revenue. In Figure 1, I show an example with a symmetric V function (the black curve) which is piecewise linear (there are three kinks, which represents 4 alternative actions). The distribution F is uniform. To simplify the illustration, I only plot µ P r0.5, 1s as everything is completely symmetric around 0.5. p is the optimal flat price for the fully revealing signal structure. All buyer's with belief within r1 ´ µ, µs purchases this contract. The area of blue region in Figure 1 represents the optimal revenue from flat-pricing. Figure 1: Optimal flat-price Figure 2: Discriminative pricing Now consider including a small set of buyer types within rµ, µ1s by introducing a second option. In this example, let the second option be a "simple" signal structure. It reveals state l perfectly, and state h imperfectly. Consider the buyer with belief µ1. The posterior belief induced by the fully revealing signal is 0 and the posterior belief ν induced by the partially revealing signal is interior. The dashed line in Figure 2 show the linear combination of p0, Vp0qq and pν, Vpνqq. Standard analysis implies that the utility of type µ1 from observing this signal structure is exactly the dashed line evaluated at µ1. By the individual rationality of type µ1, the price of the second signal structure is p1. The second option is more attractive than the first one to some buyer types who originally purchase the first option. For example, type µ gets zero surplus from the 6 pμμVpp'μμ'μVfully revealing signal structure, but strictly positive surplus from the second option. So to make all buyer types who originally purchase option one still purchase option one, the price of option one should be reduced to p1 ă p to give those buyer types more surplus. To sum up, by introducing a second option and reducing the price of the first option, the revenue gain is from including more buyer types (the area of orange region in Figure 2), the revenue loss is from reducing the price for fully revealing signal structure (the area of red region in Figure 2). Whether introducing the second option improves revenue depends on the comparison of the areas of the two regions. Now let us calculate the revenue gain and loss from introducing the second option. A key term is the reduction in price p when buyer type µ is different between the two options. Denote the fully revealing signal structure g f and the second signal structure g1. The downward incentive compatibility constraint implies: ùñ p ´ p1 ěp ´ p1 ´ ` Upg f , µq ´ Upg1, µq Upg f , µq´p1 ´ Vpµq ě Upg1, µq ´ p1 ´ Vpµq ` 1q ´ 1q ` Vpµ Upg f , µq ´ Upg1, µq 1q ´ Upg1, µq dµ when dµ " µ ` "Upg f , µq ´ Vpµq ´ Upg1, µ Upg1, µ "pVpµ „ Upg1, µq 1 ´ µ Ñ 0 1q ´ Vpµqq ´ V1pµq ´ B Bµ let aµ be the optimal choice of action when belief is µ. Then the value of V1pµq is upaµ, rq ´ upaµ, lq. Now we calculate the value of B BµUp0g1, µ. By construction of g1, one of the signal reveals state l for sure. That is to say, there exists q s.t.: # g1ps0lq " q; g1ps1lq " 1 ´ q g1ps0rq " 0; g1ps1rq " 1 Let a0, a1 be the corresponding optimal action observing signal s0 and s1. Then: Upg1, µq "µupa1, rq ` p1 ´ µqpqupa0, lq ` p1 ´ qqupa1, lqq Upg1, µq "upa1, rq ´ pqupa0, lq ` p1 ´ qqupa1, lqq ùñ B Bµ The last equality is by symmetry of the problem. To sum up: "upa1, lqp1 ´ qq ` looooooooooomooooooooooon upaµ, rq ´ upaµ, lq riskiness of action aµ dp „ ´upa0, rqp1 ´ qq The price change due to introduction of the second signal structure can be decomposed into two terms. The first term captures the riskiness of the optimal action chosen at be- lief µ -- potential loss of utility when in the counterfactual state. The second negative term is proportional to upa0, rq, the utility of the wrong action chosen at state r. dp is smaller, namely the informational rent extracted from type µ is larger, when the first term is smaller and the second negative term is larger. 7 It is possible that dp is sufficiently small that including the second option is prof- itable. In fact, in the numerical example that generates Figures 1 and 2, the area of the orange region is larger than the red region, namely flat-pricing is dominated by a richer menu. This analysis also illustrates the characterization of Bergemann et al. (2014)'s binary type, binary action model. When action is binary, the value of pupaµ, rq´ upaµ, lqq is coupled with upa1, rqp1´ qq in a particular way (in fact aµ " a1). In this special case, the analysis in Bergemann et al. (2014) proves that introducing more options is always suboptimal. However, as I have illustrated, considering a more gen- eral decision problem for buyer of information decouples the two terms determining the informational rent that can be extracted by add a second signal structure. There- fore, a rich decision problem might lead to a rich revenue maximizing menu being optimal. This intuition will be confirmed formally in Theorem 1. 3.2 Assumptions I need a series of technical assumptions to obtain a good form of solution. Assumption 1. Distribution of buyer's beliefs fpµq P Lr0, 1s satisfies @λ: fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 fpµqµ decreasing with µ ą F´1p1 ´ λq. decreasing with µ ă F´1p1 ´ λq . Assumption 1 is an analog of the standard monotonic likelihood ratio condition. In this problem, since an uncertain belief gets most extra utility from information (a "high type"), the type space is not linearly ordered. In stead, the willingness to pay for information as a function of belief first increases then decreases. So the type space can be divided into two intervals, on each of which the type is linearly ordered. Assump- tion 1 modifies the standard monotonic likelihood ratio condition such that it operates on each of the two ordered type regions properly. 1. Vpµq P Cp2qp0, 1q. There exists µ ă µ and λ ă λ in p0, 1q such that: $&%Vpµq ` V1pµqp1 ´ µq ` V2pµq µp1´µq2 $'&'% Vpµq ´ V1pµqµ ` V2pµq µ2p1´µq ´ 1 ` fpµqµ ¯λ`Fpµq´1 1 ´ fp ¯µqp1´ ¯µq λ`Fp ¯µq´1 µ is strictly increasing 1´ ¯µ is strictly decreasing ¯ pVpµq ` V1pµqp1 ´ µqq ` V2pµq µp1´µq2 1´µ pVpµq ´ V1pµqµq ` V2pµq µ2p1´µq is strictly decreasing fpµqµ ¯λ`Fpµq´1 " 1. Let π be the profit earned ¯µ is strictly increasing 2. µ and µ are defined by fp ¯µqp1´ ¯µq λ`Fp ¯µq´1 " 1 and by seller using mechanism proposed in Theorem 1, then: Assumption 2. @µ P rµ, µs, @λ P rλ, λs, ! max Vp1q ` p1 ´ ¯µ qVp0q ´ Vp ¯µ q, µ Vp1q ` p1 ´ µ qVp0q ´ Vpµ ¯µ 8 ) q ă π ‰ " Assumption 2 is a sufficient condition for the optimal mechanism to contain only "simple" signal structures. The first part is an analog of two standard assumptions widely used in nonlinear pricing: supermodularity condition and monotonic virtual value condition. First of all, as I have discussed in Assumption 1, since the type space is di- vided into two ordered subsets, each condition need to be defined on the two sets separately in a symmetric way. The first set of monotonicity conditions states the stan- dard supermodularity condition. The reason that I need them to be satisfied only on µ P rµ, µs is that when µ is outside of the interval, supermodularity is implied by the monotonic virtual value conditions. The second set of monotonicity conditions states the standard monotonic virtual value condition. The equivalence will be clear when I calculate the virtual value. is the region for possible locations of the (endoge- nous) threshold where monotonicity of types switches. Finally, the second part is a non-standard condition. It implies that choosing the threshold being too extreme (out- side of rλ, λs) is dominated by the optimal mechanism proposed in Theorem 1. Remark. If underlying problem is symmetric ( f and V are both symmetry around 0.5), then ¯λ " λ " 0.5 in Assumption 2, as the threshold belief where monotonicity of types switches is 0.5. In this case, it is not hard to verify that only the supermodularity conditions are sufficient for rest two. 3.3 Optimal menu Theorem 1. The optimal mechanism solving Equation (1) involves signal structures each with up to two signals. There exists λ P pλ, ¯λq and µ`, µ´ satisfying: λ, λ # fpµ´qµ´ ` pλ ` Fpµ´q ´ 1q " 0 fpµ`qp1 ´ µ`q ´ pλ ` Fpµ`q ´ 1q " 0 • For µ P rµ´, µ`s, a signal structure fully revealing the state is sold at flat price. • For µ P r0, µ´s, a signal structure fully revealing only state h is sold. The non-conclusive signal induces posterior belief mintν, µu, where ν is defined by: 1 ` fpµqµ λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 pVpνq ´ Vp1q ` V1pνqp1 ´ νqq ` V2pνq νp1 ´ νq2 1 ´ µ " 0 • For µ P rµ`, 1s, a signal structure fully revealing only l will be sold. The non-conclusive signal induces posterior belief maxtµ1, µu, where µ1 is defined by: 1 ´ fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 pVpνq ´ Vp0q ´ V1pνqνq ` V2pνq ν2p1 ´ νq µ " 0 Theorem 1 states that the revenue maximizing menu contains a rich set of simple signal structures. The signal structures in the optimal menu is simple in that each of them involves only two signal. One of the signal reveals one of the state perfectly, while the other signal partially reveals another state. For buyer types with uncertain prior belief, which values information a lot, the fully revealing signal structure is sold 9 to them at a flat price. The remaining buyer types are ordered by the distances of their beliefs from the center region. Buyer with more uncertain prior belief purchases a more informative signal structure. For those buyer types, if the prior belief is higher on state h, then the buyer is assigned a signal structure fully revealing state l, and vice versa. This means the optimal menu assigns signal structures that precisely contra- dicts buyer's private belief, and imprecisely confirms buyer's private belief. To illustrate the characterization in Theorem 1, I calculate a numerical example: Example 1. Suppose the underlying decision problem is to choose actions from r0, 1s to minimize a quadratic loss: upa, θq " ´px ´ θq2 where θ " t0, 1u. It can be equality verified that Vpµq " µ2 ´ µ. Let buyer's private belief about seller's private signal distribute uniformly on r0, 1s. First, as I discussed in Assumption 2, symmetry of the problem makes Assumptions 1 and 2 easy to verify. The condition in Theorem 1 that characterizes optimal posterior induced by the non-conclusive signal in each signal structure reduces to a linear function. When µ ą 0.5: 1 ` 2µ2 ´ 3.5µ ` p2µ ´ 1qµ1 " 0 The revenue maximizing menu is illustrated in 3: Figure 3: Optimal mechanism with quadratic utility and uniform distribution The solid blue line is utility function on belief Vpµq. The dashed line is buyer's expected payoff from the decision problem given choosing the incentive compatible signal structure-price pair from the optimal menu. The difference between dashed line and solid black line is the price charged by the seller. For buyers with belief µ roughly between 0.25 and 0.75, a fully revealing experiment is sold at flat price. For buyers with more extreme beliefs, a continuum of partially revealing experiments is sold. Buyers with even more extreme beliefs are excluded from the market. 4 Proof methodology As is discussed, there are two main difficulties in solving Equation (1). First, the type space is not linearly ordered. Second, the contract space is an infinite dimen- sional space. In this section, I show that main methodology I use to overcome the two difficulties and solve for the optimal menu. 10 0.20.40.60.81.0-0.25-0.20-0.15-0.10-0.054.1 Simplification In this section, I discuss how the dimensionality of space of contracts can be re- duced. First of all, as a standard approach in nonlinear pricing, instead of solving problem (1), I study a relaxed problem: ż maxM s.t. 0 1 " ppµq fpµqdµ B Bsµ pp0q " pp1q " 0 Esµ Vp µpµ, sµqq ‰dsµ dµ " p1pµq (2) (IC1) (IR1) Equation (2) relaxes the global incentive compatibility constraints and individual ra- tionality constraints in Equation (1) to only local ones. Since at µ " 0 and µ " 1, experiments are of no value to the decision maker, the price at these two beliefs must be zero. Therefore IR1 is a necessary condition. By a standard envelope theorem ar- gument, global IC constraint implies local IC constraint (IC1). Therefore, Lemma 1 is quite straightforward: Lemma 1. The solution of Equation (2) satisfying global IC and IR is a solution of Equa- tion (2). Given Lemma 1, my first task is to solve the relaxed problem (2) and then verify the global IC and IR. From the relaxed problem Equation (2), IC1 can be rewritten by integrating it: ż " µ " ppµq " ‰ ı d Vp µ, sµq Esµ dµ ´ Vpµq ´ Vp µ, sµq ż ı Replace ppµq in the objective function: 0 ż ´ Esµ µ 0 „ "Esµ " „ Vp µ, sµq B Bµ ż ż maxM s.t. 1 0 1 0 Esµ Esµ 1  0 B Esµ Bµ dµ " 0 fpµqdµ ´ pVp µ, sµq ´ Vpµqq „ „ B Bµ Esµ dµ  Vp µ, sµq B Bµ  pVp µ, sµq ´ Vpµqq  pVp µ, sµq ´ Vpµqq dµ p1 ´ Fpµqqdµ (3) Now let's define the exact form of experiments in the menu. Let the set of possible signals be S " tsiu (i is general index). Each signal si realizes in state l with probability qi and in state h with probability pi. Thus, when signal si is observed, posterior belief piµ`qip1´µq. The probability that signal si realizes is piµ ` qip1 ´ µq from the µpsi, µq " ÿ ż buyer with prior µ's point of view. Equation (2) can be written as: piµ 1 ¸ piµ ` qip1 ´ µqq ´ Vpµq piµ ppiµ ` qip1 ´ µqqVp fpµqdµ max tpi,qiu (4) 0 i 11 ż 1 0 ´ ż ÿ 0 1 ÿ B ÿ Bµ ÿ i i B Bµ pi " ¸ ¸ piµ ` qip1 ´ µqq ´ Vpµq p1 ´ Fpµqqdµ piµ ` qip1 ´ µqq ´ Vpµq dµ " 0 piµ piµ s.t. ppiµ ` qip1 ´ µqqVp ppiµ ` qip1 ´ µqqVp qi " 1 i i To simplify the problem in the dimensionality of contracts in the optimal menu, I develop the following lemmas that shows that the optimal menu only includes a class of experiment with very simple form. Lemma 2. The optimal menu which solves Equation (4) includes experiments with up to three signals, and up to one of them is partially informative. The intuition for proving lemma 2 is simple. I prove that conditional on existence of at least two interior signals in an experiment, any two interior signals should induce the same posterior belief to satisfy a first order condition. Interior signal is defined as a signal which realizes with probability within p0, 1q at any state. Under this condi- tion, the first order condition involving two interior signals includes no multiplier on choice of conditional probability. Therefore, I can use the monotonicity of first order condition to show that the two interior signals must be identical. Then Assumption 2 guarantees that for any µ P p0, 1q, this monotonicity holds. Therefore, the optimal mechanism involves experiments with no more than three signals. And at most one of the three signals is partially informative. With Lemma 2, I can reduce the dimensionality of mechanism space to two (the posterior associated with the interior signal and the probability of realization of this signal). I further simplify this problem into a one-dimensional problem using the fol- lowing lemma: Lemma 3. The optimal mechanism which solves Equation (4) includes experiments with up to two signals. To prove Lemma 3, I assume for the purpose of contradiction the existence of two fully revealing signals in an experiment. Then, I study the first order condition of an interior signal. By studying the sign of first order condition in different regions, I con- clude that the first order conditions associated with the two fully revealing signals can not hold simultaneously. Therefore, I conclude that the optimal menu only includes experiments with up two signals and at most one of them is partially revealing. 4.2 Solving the optimal mechanism With Lemmas 1, 2 and 3, Equation (1) is simplified into a simple one-dimensional mechanism design problem with single variate. Before proceeding to writing down the reduced problem, I still want to determine what kind of experiments is sold to what kind of consumer. To be specific, I want to know the region of buyer to which experiments perfectly revealing l and experiments perfectly revealing h are sold. Lemma 4. Let µ0 " F´1p1 ´ λq, 12 • For µ P r0, µ0s, experiments revealing h are sold. • For µ P rµ0, 1s, experiments revealing l are sold. With lemma 4, I can write down the reduced problem with a mechanism sending signals tH, Lu defined as following: • For µ P rµ0, 1s, when θ " l, ppLq " q, ppHq " 1 ´ q, when θ " h, ppLq " 0, ppHq " 1. • For µ P r0, µ0s, when θ " h, ppLq " 1´ p, ppHq " p, when θ " l, ppLq " 1, ppHq " 0. I define ∆Vpµ, p, qq as the surplus of buyer type µ purchasing experiment with p, q defined as before. Then the expression of ∆Vpµ, , qq is: ´ µp1´pq`1´µ ¯ ´ pµ $&%pµVp1q ` pµp1 ´ pq ` 1 ´ µqV ż qp1 ´ µqVp0q ` pµ ` p1 ´ qqp1 ´ µqqV ∆Vpµ, p, qq " ż Therefore the optimization problem for seller can be rewritten as: ¯ ´ Vpµq µ`p1´qqp1´µq µ if µ ă µ0 if µ ě µ0 ´ Vpµq max ppµq,qpµq s.t. µ0 ż 0 µ0 0 ` ż 0 µ0 ∆Vpµ, ppµq, 1q fpµqdµ ` p1 ´ Fpµqq B ż Bµ B ∆Vpµ, ppµq, 1qdµ ` Bµ 1 µ0 ż 1 ∆Vpµ, 1, qpµqq fpµqdµ p1 ´ Fpµqq B Bµ ∆Vpµ, 1, qpµqqdµ " 0 µ0 B Bµ 1 µ0 ∆Vpµ, ppµq, 1qdµ ` ∆Vpµ, 1, qpµqqdµ Let λ1 be Lagrangian multiplier on the constraint, then the optimality condition re- quires λ1 exactly being λ defined in Theorem 1. The FOCs are: ` V2pµ1q µ2 ` Vpµ1q ´ Vp0q ´ µ1V1pµ1q " 0 pVpµ2q ´ Vp1q ` p1 ´ µ2qV1pµ2qq ` V2pµ2q µ2p1 ´ µ2q2 1 ´ µ 1 ´ p1 ´ µq fpµq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 µ fpµq 1 ` λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 1p1 ´ µ1q " 0 (6) (5) µ µ1 is the induced belief when the other signal reveals l, µ2 is the induced belief when the other signal reveals h.Then to establish uniqueness result, let's study the two FOCs more carefully. First define µ` and µ´: # fpµ´qµ´ ` pλ ` Fpµ´q ´ 1q " 0 fpµ`qp1 ´ µ`q ´ pλ ` Fpµ`q ´ 1q " 0 r0, 1s can be devided into four regions: Region 1: µ P p0, µ´q In this region, by Lemma 4 h is revealed. Therefore first order condition for p is char- acterized by Equation (6). Since µ ă µ´, 1 ` µ fpµq λ`Fpµq´1 ą 0. Therefore Equation (6) 13 B2 BµBp B2 BµBq ∆V " ´Vpµ2q ` Vp1q ´ V1pµ2qp1 ´ µ2q ´ V2pµ2q µ2p1 ´ µ2q2 1 ´ µ ∆V " Vpµ1q ´ Vp0q ´ V1pµ1qµ1 ` V2pµ1q µ2 1p1 ´ µ1q (7) Region 2: µ P rµ´, µ0s might have solution. Moreover, since µ can be set arbitrarily close to µ´, there exist a positive mass of µ such that Equation (6) has solution. In this region, I still use Equation (6). However, in this region 1` µ fpµq λ`Fpµq´1 ď 0. There- fore Equation (6) has no solution with µ2 ą 0. The only possibility that this FOC might hold is when p " 1 and induces a positive multiplier. So in this region, the fully revealing experiment is sold. Retion 3: µ P rµ0, µ`s In this region, by Lemma 4 l is revealed. Therefore first order condition for q is char- acterized by Equation (5). Since µ ď µ`, 1 ´ p1´µq fpµq λ`Fpµq´1 ď 0. Therefore Equation (5) has no solution with µ1 ă 1. The only possibility that FOC might hold is when q " 1 and induces a positive multiplier. So in this region, the fully revealing experiment is sold. Region 4: µ P pµ`, 1q In this region, by Lemma 4 l is revealed. Therefore FOC for q is characterized by Equa- tion (5). Since µ ą µ`, 1 ´ µ fpµq λ`Fpµq´1 ą 0, Equation (5) might have solution. Similar to present argument, there exist a positive mass of µ such that Equation (5) has solution. It's necessary to verify the single crossing difference condition and monotonicity condition to make local ICs sufficient for global ICs and IRs. Cross derivatives of ∆V are: µ (8) Equation (7) applies when µ ă µ0. According to Assumption 2, µ ă ¯µ, therefore Equa- tion (7) is monotonically decreasing. Meanwhile at µ2 " 1, this term is 0. Therefore this term is positive for any µ2 ă 1. That is to say, single crossing difference condition implies an increasing ppµq when µ ă µ0. Equation (8) applies when µ ą µ0. Accord- ing to Assumption 2, µ ą µ. Therefore Equation (8) is monotonically increasing. At µ1 " 0, this term is 0. Therefore this term should be negative at any µ1 ą 0. This is to say, single crossing difference condition implies an decreasing qpµq when µ ą µ0. 5 Comparative Statics In this section, I do a comparative statics analysis by shifting the distribution of buyer's private types. From this point on, I make the following symmetry assumption: Assumption 3. The environment is symmetric i.e.Vpµq " Vp1 ´ µq, fpµq " fp1 ´ µq. Given assumption 3, the environment is symmetric. Therefore there always exists a symmetric optimal menu. A symmetric menu implies λ " 0.5. Therefore, the un- known parameter λ is uniquely determined and I can define an order on distribution. Definition 1. F " t f f P ∆r0, 1s, fpxq " fp1 ´ xq, satisfying assumption 1u, @ f , g P F, F, G are corresponding CDF. We define f being more dispersed than g if for µ ă µ´ g : fpµq 0.5 ´ Fpµq ě gpµq 0.5 ´ Gpµq 14 g defined by solution of gpµq ` Gpµq ´ 0.5 " 0. µ´ Holding the decision problem fixed, when distribution of buyers become more dis- persed, of course the buyers with more extreme beliefs become relatively more im- portant. Thus seller has incentive to cut price and include more buyers to buy some products. Let's have a formal proof for this intuition. Since the problem is now to- tally symmetric, I can only focus on µ P p0, 0.5q. By theorem 1, the interval of buyers to whom the fully revealing experiment is sold is determined only by distribution. Given distribution g, the end point µ´ is solution to: 1 " gpµqµ 0.5 ´ Gpµq Therefore, by definition of dispersive order, the equality might not hold at µ´ if f is more dispersed than g. Also by monotonicity assumption on distribution, correspond- ing µ´ must decreases. The interval of buyers to whom at least a partially informative experiment is sold is jointly determined by distribution and decision problem. Given distribution g, the end point is solution to: p1 ´ gpµqµ 0.5 ´ GpµqqpVpµq ´ Vp1q ` V1pµqp1 ´ µqq ` V2pµqµp1 ´ µq " 0 By definition of dispersive order, the equality might not hold at original point if f is more dispersed than g. Assume that the end point is different from original one, I want to argue that it must be smaller. If this is not the case, then µ1pµq as a function under distribution f must cross µ1pµq under g at least once. However this is not possible according to first order condition. Because at a same µ, changing distribution to a more dispersed one only changes the coefficient before a strict negative term. Noticing that here I didn't prove continuity of mechanism. So a more strict treatment is needed in a formal proof. To summarize, I have the following proposition. Proposition 1. Given underlying decision problem V, when distribution of buyer's belief become more dispersed, the interval to which fully revealing experiment is sold is expanding. µ´ decreases and µ` increases. The interval to which at least partially revealing experiment is sold is expanding. Combining Proposition 1 and the no crossing argument, I can easily derive the following proposition: Proposition 2. Given underlying decision problem V, when distribution of buyer's belief become more dispersed, any buyer holding a prior belief µ will be sold a Blackwell more infor- mative experiment in optimal mechanism. Proposition 2 states that when distribution of buyer's belief become more dis- persed, all buyer type are sold a better experiment which generates higher payoff 15 from the decision problem. I am also interested whether this higher payoff gener- ates higher surplus for buyers. Let's start by rewriting surplus for a specific buyer ∆VpEpµq, µq ´ ppµq. Local incentive compatibility constraint implies: Epµq p∆VpEpµq, µq ´ Ppµqq " B Bµ ∆VpE, µq d dµ ż P1pµq " B BE ñ d dµ ñ ∆VpE, µq ´ Ppµq " µ ∆VµpE, νqdν 0 ∆VpE, µq Let's again focus only on µ P p0, 0.5q by symmetry. Now let ppµq be the probabil- ity defining experiments for optimal mechanism under distribution g. Let's p1pµq be the corresponding mechanism under distribution f and f is more dispersed than g. Therefore by Proposition 2 ppµq ď p1pµq. Then: ż ∆Vµpppµq, νqdν ppνq ż ∆Vpppµq, µq ´ Ppµq " ∆Vpp, νqdpdν ż ż ż " 0 µ µ B2 BµBp B2 BµBp 0 µ 0 p1pνq ď " ∆Vpp1pµq, µq ´ Ppµq 0 0 ∆Vpp, νqdpdν The inequality is implied by single crossing different condition: sum up, I have the following proposition. B2BµBp ∆Vpp, µq ą 0. To Proposition 3. Given underlying decision problem V, when distribution of buyer's belief become more dispersed, any buyer holding a belief µ will be weakly better off in optimal mech- anism. Example 2. Starting from the same setup in Example 1. Fix the same belief and mod- ify distribution by rotating pdf of the uniform distribution around the critical points defined as in Definition 1. It's easy to verify that this rotation operation satisfies the dispersive order. Then the resulting optimal mechanisms are depicted in Figure 4: Figure 4: Comparative statics 16 0.20.40.60.81.0-0.25-0.20-0.15-0.10-0.05I calculate 5 different levels of dispersiveness in this example. When the buyer's private belief distribution is most dispersed, the optimal menu is characterized by the red curve. When the buyer's private belief distribution is most condensed, the optimal menu is characterized by the blue curve. It is clear that for any given buyer's private belief, the more dispersed the belief distribution is, the better signal structure he purchases from the revenue maximizing menu (the upper red curve is higher than the upper blue curve). Meanwhile, he gets more surplus from trading ( the lower red curve is higher than the lower blue curve). 6 Conclusion In this paper, I study the optimal nonlinear pricing of information in the envi- ronment of selling information to a buyer whole is making a decision and observed private signal about the payoffs. I focus on the case that the buyer's decision problem involves a rich set of different actions, and the seller's information is binary. I show that under some regularity conditions, the seller's revenue maximizing menu contains a rich set of "simple" signal structures. The "simple" signal structures each contains only two signals, one of which perfect revealing a state. When the buyer's private belief is very uncertain, he purchases a fully revealing signal structure at a flat price. When his private belief is more certain, he purchases a signal structure that perfectly contradicts his prior belief. The more certain he is, the less informative signal structure he purchases. I also provide a comparative statics result on the dispersiveness of belief distribu- tion. When the belief distribution becomes more dispersed, targeting least informed seller types become less profitable so the seller include a wider interval of buyer types into the menu and also provide the fully revealing experiment to a wider interval of buyer types. All buyer types are offered a Blackwell more informative experiment. Corresponding price decreases and buyer with a certain belief enjoys a higher surplus. 17 Let's assign λ as the Lagrangian multiplier on the integral constraint. Then let's i qi " 1. Thus the whole problem will be: replace some signal j using A Proofs for Section 4 A.1 Proof of Lemma 2 ř ř ÿ ż i 1 1 ż 0 ` 0 i pi " ppiµ ` qip1 ´ µqqVp B Bµ ÿ ppiµ ` qip1 ´ µqqVp i L " ¸ piµ ` qip1 ´ µqq ´ Vpµq piµ ¸ fpµqdµ p1 ´ Fpµq ´ λqdµ piµ ` qip1 ´ µqq ´ Vpµq piµ We take FOC for pi: p fpµqµ ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qq ` ` Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq Vpµjq ` V1pµjqp1 ´ µjq ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµjq µjp1 ´ µjq2 ` γ 1 ´ µ p is the multiplier for pi ď 0. Similarly let's p is the multiplier for pj ď 0 and γ´ "p fpµqµ ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qq Here γ` ` take FOC for qi, with multipliers defined in same way: p fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qq ` "p fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qq ` γ Now let's assume µj is an interior belief, i.e. pj, qj P p0, 1q. Thus if µi is also an interior p " belief, for the mechanism to be optimal, I require FOCs to be held with γ` q " γ´ γ` H1pµiq " p fpµqµ ` pλ ´ Fpµq ´ 1qq H2pµiq " p fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ´ Fpµq ´ 1qq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµiq µ2 ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµjq µ2 q " 0. Thus, the resulting µi, µj is determined by function: Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ i p1 ´ µiq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qV2pµiq µ2 i p1 ´ µiq jp1 ´ µjq µ Vpµjq ` V1pµjqµj Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi p " γ´ ` ` µ µ ` p ´ γ ´ p ` q ´ γ ´ q If both functions are monotonic on (0,1), then all interior µis must have the same value. To investigate this, I divide r0, 1s into four regions and discuss µ case by case. Also I use assumption 2 to restrict the value of λ. Region 1:µ P rµ, F´1p1 ´ λqs " ı µ, F´1p1 ´ λq : When µ P fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ą ´pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ě 0 By convexity of V: Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi weakly decreasing 18 Then according to part one of assumption 2: i p1 ´ µiq i p1 ´ µiq Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ` V2pµiq µ2 Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ` V2pµiq µ2 " µ µ ¸ ` µ µ 1 ´ µ µ pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq strictly decreasing. Because both terms are decreasing and the coefficients are positive. Thus: loooooooooomoooooooooon H1pµiq " fpµqp1 ´ µqpVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq decreasing ¸ loooooooooooooooooooooooooomoooooooooooooooooooooooooon i p1 ´ µiq Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ` V2pµiq µ2 µ looooooooomooooooooon ` ´pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q positive is strictly decreasing. Therefore, given µj being interior, when µ P rµ, F´1p1 ´ λqs, interior µi must equal to µj. When µ P rF´1p1 ´ λq, ¯µs: Region 2:µ P rF´1p1 ´ λq, ¯µs decreasing By convexity of V: fpµqµ ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ą λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq weakly increasing Then according to part one of assumption 2: " Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ ¯µ 1 ´ ¯µ 1 ´ µ loooooooooooooomoooooooooooooon H2pµiq " fpµqp1 ´ µqpVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq strictly increasing. From the same argument as before. Therefore: ` ¯µ ´ µ 1 ´ µ pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq looooooomooooooon ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q positive increasing loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ F´1p1 ´ λq, ¯µ increasing " ‰ , inte- is strictly increasing. Therefore given µj being interior, when µ P rior µi must equal to µj. optimality λ P pλ, ¯λq. Then let's study µ close to 0 or 1. According to part three of assumption 2, by 19 1 ` ¸ fpµqµ Since λ ą λ, by part two of assumption 2: pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ Region 3:µ P p0, µs λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 fpµqµ 1 ` " λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 ` µ ´ µ fpµqµ 1 ` 1 ´ µ We know that the second term is weakly increasing (positive coefficient). Let's deal with the first term: 1 ` 1 ` λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 ¸ 1 ´ µ pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 1 ´ µ 1 ´ µ fpµqµ fpµqµ " ¸ pVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiqq ¯λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 ´ fpµqµ λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 ` fpµqµ ¯λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 The first term is increasing according to assumption 2. The second term is increasing because the coefficient is positive given λ ă ¯λ and µ ď µ. Noticing the term I in- vestigated is H1pµiq times some constant coefficient. Therefore given µj being interior, when µ P p0, µs, interior µi must equal to µj. Since λ ă ¯λ, by part two of assumption 2, I have: Region 4:µ P r ¯µ, 1q " pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq ` V2pµiq µ2 pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq ` V2pµiq µ2 1 ´ fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 1 ´ fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 1 ´ fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq ` V2pµiq µ2 pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq ` V2pµiq µ2 ´ fp ¯µqp1 ´ ¯µq λ ` Fp ¯µq ´ 1 1 ´ fpµqp1 ´ µq λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 1 ´ fp ¯µqp1 ´ ¯µq λ ` Fp ¯µq ´ 1 fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq " pVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµiq µ ` µ ´ ¯µ with the first term: i p1 ´ µiq i p1 ´ µiq µ ¯µ ¸ ¯µ µ i p1 ´ µiq i p1 ´ µiq ¯µ µ We know that the second term is weakly decreasing (positive coefficient). Let's deal The first term is strictly decreasing according to assumption 2. The second term is decreasing because the coefficient is positive given λ ą λ and µ ě ¯µ. Noticing the 20 term I investigated is H2pµiq times some constant coefficient. Therefore I can conclude that given µj being interior, when µ P r ¯µ, 1q, interior µi must equal to µj. To sum up, I've proved that signals inducing interior beliefs must induce the same belief. Thus the only possibility is boundary beliefs i.e. the case where pi, qi " 0, 1. First, it's straight forward from the existence of another interior signal, pi, qi " 1 is impossible. Because that will drive all other signals to inducing extreme beliefs. There I only need to discuss case where pi, qi " 0. When pi " 0, µi " 0. When qi " 0, µi " 1. Therefore, assuming there exists an signal inducing interior belief, the possible experiment satisfying optimality must only induce one interior belief and up to two extreme beliefs. Assuming there doesn't exist an signal inducing interior belief, then the only possibility is that the experiment induces two extreme beliefs. To sum up, optimal mechanism solving problem (4) includes experiments with up to one partially informative signal. We proved lemma 2. A.2 Proof of Lemma 3 Let's still utilize the FOCs derived in the proof of lemma 2. They can be written as: H1pµiq " H1pµjq ` γ H2pµiq " H2pµjq ` γ ` p ´ γ ` q ´ γ ´ p ´ q I want to show that one of the three signals will never appear in optimal mechanism. To investigate this, I divide r0, 1s into four regions and discuss µ case by case. Given a λ, let's first define µ´, µ0, µ` as: $''&''% fpµ´qµ´ ` pλ ` Fpµ´q ´ 1q " 0 fpµ`qp1 ´ µ`q ´ pλ ` Fpµ`q ´ 1q " 0 λ ` Fpµ0q ´ 1 " 0 By assumption part three of 2, µ ă µ´ ă µ` ă ¯µ. Region 1:µ P p0, µ´q We assume that there exists an interior signal inducing µj • If µi " 1, then FOC implies: loooooooooooooomoooooooooooooon p fpµqµ ` λ ` Fpµq ´ 1q Vp1q " H1pµjq negative • If µi " 0, then FOC implies: loooooooooooooomoooooooooooooon p fpµqµ ` λ ` Fpµq ´ 1q pVp0q ` V1p0qq " H1pµjq ´ γ ´ p negative • If both of them are true, then: loooooooooooooomoooooooooooooon p fpµqµ ` λ ` Fpµq ´ 1q looooooooooooomooooooooooooon pVp0q ` V1p0q ´ Vp1qq " ´γ ´ p negative negative 21 This is impossible. This is saying that when µ P p0, µ´q, there will be up to two signals in optimal mechanism. Region 2:µ P pµ`, 1q We assume that there exists and interior signal inducing µj: • If µi " 1, then FOC implies: p fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qpVp1q ´ V1p1qq " H2pµjq ´ γ ´ q • If µi " 0, then FOC implies: • If both of them are true, then: pFpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qqVp0q " H2pµjq loooooooooooomoooooooooooon Vp1q ´ V1p1q ´ Vp0q looooooooooooooooooomooooooooooooooooooon pFpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pµ ` Fpµq ´ 1qq " ´γ ´ q negative negative This is impossible. This is saying that when µ P pµ`, 1q there will be up to two signals in optimal mechanism. Region 3:µ P rµ´, µ0s In this region: Consider: fpµqp1 ´ µq ´ pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ąě pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ě 0 G2pµiq " Vpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ´ Vp0q ` V2pµiq µip1 ´ µiq2 1 ´ µ By assumption 2,G2 is decreasing. It's also easy to see that G2p0q " 0. Thus G2pµiq ă 0 for µi ą 0. We assume that there exists two fully informative signals inducing µ1 " 0, µ2 " 1 and now let's consider the FOC of choosing an interior signal µ3. By µ1 " 0, µ2 " 1, p1 ą 0, q1 " 0, p2 " 0, q2 ą 0. Thus, increasing qi when using µi as reference will not trigger shadow costs. Choose µ1 as reference, by FOC: H2pµiq " H2p0q However this is not possible for µ3 ą 0. Because: H2pµiq ´ H2p0q " ´pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qG2pµiq ` fpµqp1 ´ µqpVpµiq ´ V1pµiqµi ´ Vp0qq ă 0 Thus when there are two fully informative signals, the optimal mechanism only in- cludes perfect experiment for µ P rµ´, µ0s. Region 4:µ P rµ0, µ`s In the region: fpµqµ ` pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1q ě λ ` Fpµq ´ 1 ě 0 22 Consider: G1pµiq " H1pµiq ´ H1p1q " Vpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq ´ Vp1q ` V2pµiq µ2 i p1 ´ µiq µ By assumption 2, G1 is increasing. It's also easy to see that G1p1q " 0. Thus G1pµiq ă 0 for µi ă 1. We assume that there exists two fully informative signals. Now let's consider the FOC for choosing an interior signal inducing µi. Similar to the previous argument, increasing pi when using µ2 as reference will not trigger a shadow cost. H1pµiq " H1p1q However this is not possible for µi ă 1. Because: H1pµiq ´ H1pqq " pλ ` Fpµq ´ 1qG1pµiq ` FpµqµpVpµiq ` V1pµiqp1 ´ µiq ´ Vp1qq ă 0 Thus when there are two fully informative signals, the optimal mechanism only in- cludes perfect experiment for µ P rµ0, µ`s. A.3 Proof of lemma 4 The only point at which experiment switches type is a point assigned with a fully revealing experiment. Then by monotonicity of mechanism, there are only two possi- ble patterns. Either experiments revealing 0 are sold to low prior buyers, or are sold to high prior buyers. However, in the proof of lemma 3, when µ P rµ´, µ0s, optimal experiment with an interior signal can not reveal l. When µ P rµ0, µ`s, optimal experiment with interior signal can not reveal h. Thus if experiments assigned to these two region are not fully revealing, then experiments revealing l will be assigned to buyers with higher µ and vice versa. Now the only undetermined case is when µ P rµ´, µ`s, only fully revealing exper- iments are sold. Let's look at the single crossing difference condition on qi when the other signal reveals l: µ ` qip1 ´ µqq ` p1 ´ qiqp1 ´ µqVp0q ´ Vpµq µ pµ ` qip1 ´ µqqvp B2 BµBqi "Vpµiq ´ Vp0q ´ V1pµiqµi ` V2pµiq µ2 i p1 ´ µiq µ From assumption 2, for µ ą µ, the SCD is negative. Thus, it can not be the case that experiments fully revealing l is sold to buyers with µ ă µ0 and increase to a fully revealing experiment. A same argument can be made for for the SCD of pi and we can conclude that lemma 4 is true. 23 References Bergemann, D. & Bonatti, A. (2013). Selling cookies. Bergemann, D., Bonatti, A., & Smolin, A. (2014). Selling experiments: Menu pricing of information. Blackwell, D. et al. (1951). Comparison of experiments. In Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, volume 1 (pp. 93 -- 102). Cabrales, A., Gossner, O., & Serrano, R. (2010). Entropy and the value of information for investors. Available at SSRN 1720963. Eso, P. & Szentes, B. (2007). The price of advice. The Rand Journal of Economics, 38(4), 863 -- 880. Horner, J. & Skrzypacz, A. (2011). Selling information. Kamenica, E. & Gentzkow, M. (2009). Bayesian persuasion. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. Maskin, E. & Riley, J. (1984). Monopoly with incomplete information. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(2), 171 -- 196. Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. The review of economic studies, 38(2), 175 -- 208. Moscarini, G. & Smith, L. (2002). The law of large demand for information. Economet- rica, 70(6), 2351 -- 2366. Mussa, M. & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301 -- 317. Noldeke, G. & Samuelson, L. (2018). The implementation duality. Econometrica, 86(4), 1283 -- 1324. 24
1807.11585	1	1807	2018-07-30T21:14:36	Preference Identification	[ "econ.TH" ]	An experimenter seeks to learn a subject's preference relation. The experimenter produces pairs of alternatives. For each pair, the subject is asked to choose. We argue that, in general, large but finite data do not give close approximations of the subject's preference, even when the limiting (countably infinite) data are enough to infer the preference perfectly. We provide sufficient conditions on the set of alternatives, preferences, and sequences of pairs so that the observation of finitely many choices allows the experimenter to learn the subject's preference with arbitrary precision. While preferences can be identified under our sufficient conditions, we show that it is harder to identify utility functions. We illustrate our results with several examples, including consumer choice, expected utility, and preferences in the Anscombe-Aumann model.	econ.TH	econ	PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION CHRISTOPHER P. CHAMBERS, FEDERICO ECHENIQUE, AND NICOLAS S. LAMBERT Abstract. An experimenter seeks to learn a subject's preference relation. The experimenter produces pairs of alternatives. For each pair, the subject is asked to choose. We argue that, in general, large but finite data do not give close approximations of the subject's preference, even when the limiting (countably infinite) data are enough to infer the preference perfectly. We provide sufficient conditions on the set of alternatives, preferences, and sequences of pairs so that the observation of finitely many choices allows the experimenter to learn the subject's preference with arbitrary precision. While preferences can be identified under our sufficient conditions, we show that it is harder to identify utility functions. We illustrate our results with several examples, including consumer choice, expected utility, and preferences in the Anscombe-Aumann model. 1. Introduction Consider a subject who forms a preference over the objects, or alternatives, in some set X. The subject participates in an experiment in which he is presented with a sequence of pairs of alternatives. For each pair, the subject is asked to choose one of the two alternatives offered. What can an experimenter learn about the subject's preference from observing these binary comparisons? Suppose that, after every observation, the experimenter computes an estimate (Chambers) Department of Economics, Georgetown University (Echenique) Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Insti- tute of Technology (Lambert) Graduate School of Business, Stanford University Date: First version: April 10, 2017; This version: January 12, 2018. We thank seminar audiences at Boston College, Boston University, Brown, Essex, LSE, Maryland, Johns Hopkins, George Mason, Ohio State, UCL, and audiences of conferences and workshops at Paris School of Economics, UPenn, Warwick and University of York. Echenique thanks the National Science Foundation for its support through the grants SES 1558757 and CNS 1518941. Lambert gratefully acknowledges the financial support and hospitality of Microsoft Research New York and the Yale University Cowles Foundation. 1 2 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT of the subject's preference consistent with the data observed up that point: the experimenter chooses a preference rationalizing the choices made by the subject. Is the estimate a good approximation of the subject's underlying preference, for a large but finite experiment? In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of preference estimates from finite experiments. We ask if one can fully identify the preference of a subject at the limit with finite data. It is a question of preference identification, in the classical sense of the term.1 To illustrate the key issues, consider the following example. Let X ⊆ Rn represent a set of consumption bundles. The subject has a preference, denoted by (cid:23)∗, over the elements of X. Over time, the subject is asked to choose an alternative from sets Bk = {xk, yk}, where k is the time index. Together, the sets B1, B2, . . . , Bk form a finite experiment. The experimenter observes the subject's choice of bundle for every pair. Assume the choice is consistent with the subject's preference, so that if x is chosen over y, then x (cid:23)∗ y. Note that we can only, at best, infer the preference of the subject on the set B ≡ ∪∞ k=1Bk. Thus, if the subject's preference behaves very differently outside of the set B, there is no hope to obtain a fine approximation of the subject's preference over the entire set X. Two natural conditions emerge. First, we require that (cid:23)∗ be continuous, so one can hope to approximate the preference from finitely many samples. Second, we require that the set B is dense in X, so that the observations are sufficiently spread out. And indeed, we show that, under these conditions, if one can observe the preference of the subject over the whole set B, then one can infer precisely (cid:23)∗ on X. The two conditions, continuity of (cid:23)∗ and denseness of B, are, however, not enough to provide good approximations of (cid:23)∗ from finitely many observations. Knowledge of the preference over the infinite set B allows the experimenter 1 Standard decision-theoretic language reserves the term identified for a relation between preference and utility. In that context, a model is identified if every preference relation is represented by a unique (up to some class of transformations) set of parameters. Thus, identification in this sense requires the knowledge of an entire preference relation. In this paper, we do not assume knowledge of the entire preference relation. Instead, we ask if one can learn the entire preference relation with a possibly large, but nonetheless finite data set. We discuss the identification of utility functions in Section 3.4, and the relation to decision theory in Section 4.2. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 3 to exploit the continuity assumption on the subject's preference. With finite data, continuity does not have enough bite. To illustrate, take X = [0, 1], and suppose that the preference of the subject over X is captured by the binary relation ≥ (greater numbers are always preferred). Consider the countable set of objects B = Q ∩ (0, 1), and B1, B2, . . . an enumeration of pairs of objects of B. Then, any continuous preference that agrees with ≥ on Q has 1 weakly preferred to 0. However, for any n, one can find a preference (cid:23)n that rationalizes the choices of the subject over B1, . . . , Bn, and yet that ranks 0 strictly above 1. In fact, one can come up with an even more startling example: we show that no matter the subject's preference, the experimenter may end up inferring that the subject is indifferent among all alternatives (see Section 3.1). And yet, as in the example just described, she would be able to infer the subject's preference perfectly, had she access to the subject's preference over the infinite set B all at once. The example exhibits a kind of discontinuity. With infinite data in the form of B, we must conclude that x ≻ y, but any finite data cannot rule out that y (cid:23) x. These examples illustrate the dangers of data-driven estimation. Non- parametric estimation with finite data can behave very differently from es- timation with infinite (even countable) data. To derive meaningful estimates, one must construct a theory that disciplines the preferences, and lays down the proper conditions for convergence of preference estimates. This paper includes three sets of results. Our first and foremost results concern non-parametric estimation. We offer fairly general conditions so that observing sufficiently many binary choices allows one to approximate the subject's preference arbitrarily closely with any preference that rationalizes the finite data. We provide two notions of rationalization, a weak and a strong one. Under strong rationalization, a rationalizing preference must reflect choices perfectly. So if one alternative is chosen over another, the preference must rank the first strictly above the second. Under weak rationalization, the first alternative must only be ranked at least as good as the second. Weak alternatives reflect 4 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT the phenomenon of partial observability (Chambers et al., 2014) whereby one cannot infer anything from a choice that was not made. Under both notions of rationalization, it is necessary to add structure on the environment and on the rationalizing preferences so as to avoid the negative results of the example above. Importantly, we need a notion of objective ratio- nality expressed by the monotonicity of preferences. We postulate an exoge- nous partial ordering of the set of alternatives -- for example, standard vector dominance when the set of alternatives represents consumption bundles, or stochastic dominance when it is the set of lotteries over monetary amounts -- and we require that the subject's preference is monotonic with respect to that exogenous order. With this structure, finite-experiment rationalizable preferences converge to the subject's underlying preference, under conditions that are consistent with many applications in decision theory, and with experimental implementations of decision theoretic models. Stronger conditions are needed to obtain the result for weak rationalization -- conditions that hold for preferences over Eu- clidean spaces, but rule out some common applications in decision theory -- yet it is remarkable that convergence is at all attained under weak rationalization. By remaining agnostic about choices that were not made, we are inferring a lot less about the subject's preferences under the assumption of weak ratio- nalization than under strong. Our results on preference identification are relevant to a wide range of con- texts. For concreteness, we illustrate their application to the special case of preferences over lotteries, dated rewards, consumption bundles, and Anscombe- Aumann acts (Anscombe and Aumann, 1963). In all these cases, there is a natural objective partial order and monotonicity is a sensible assumption. There are other environments in which one cannot reasonably impose any kind of monotonicity. For instance, in the literature on discrete allocation (such as in Hylland and Zeckhauser (1979) or in the recent literature on school choice, such as in Pathak and Sethuraman (2011)) in which agents are assumed to choose among lotteries over finitely many heterogeneous objects. Monotonic- ity would require that all agents agree on a ranking of the discrete objects that are being allocated, an unreasonable requirement. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 5 Our second set of results concerns the identification of utility functions. Given a utility representation for the agent's preference, we show that it is possible to carefully select finite-data utility rationalizations so as to approx- imate the subject's utility arbitrarily closely. This result also rests on mono- tonicity assumptions. However, there is a clear difference between estimating preferences and utilities. While any preference estimate converges to the true underlying preference, for utilities we only know that a certain selection con- verges. This observation is especially relevant when estimating utilities of a particular functional form. There is no guarantee that such utility estimates have the correct asymptotic behavior; one can only say that the preferences that these utilities represent do. Our third and final results concern the identification of preferences with in- finite but countable data. We show that, when the experimenter has access to the preference of the subject over all alternatives of a countable set, then it is possible to recover perfectly the subject's preference over the entire set of alternatives X under much weaker conditions than above. We further demon- strate that, under such conditions, the experimenter can, in theory, obtain the subject's preference directly from the observation of a single choice of the subject when the subject is asked to select an object among a large, infinite set. The remainder of the paper proceeds as follows. After reviewing the liter- ature, we describe the model in Section 2. We present our main results for important cases of collections of alternatives in Section 3 and discuss these results in Section 4. In Section 5, we present our main results for general col- lections of alternatives. In Section 6, we study the relation between preference and utility, and provide conditions under which the identification of a prefer- ence makes it possible to identify a utility, and conversely. In Section 7, we further show that when the set of possible utilities is compact, one can obtain a strong form of identification, which dispenses with the postulate of existence of a data-generating preference. We discuss the question of preference iden- tification with infinite but countable data in Section 8. Finally, in Section 9, we offer interpretations on the meaning of a data-generating preference. We 6 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT relegate the proofs and more technical results to the appendices (some of these results may be of independent interest). Literature Review. Experimentalists and decision theorists have an obvious interest in preference estimation, but we are not aware of any study of the behavior of preference estimates from finite experiments. The long tradition of revealed preference theory from finite data that goes back to Afriat (1967) is focused on testing, not estimation. The closest work to ours is Mas-Colell (1978), who works with finitely many observations from a demand function over a finite number of goods. Mas-Colell assumes a rational demand function that satisfies a boundary condition and is "income Lipschitzian." He assumes a sufficiently rich sequence of observations, taken from an increasing sequence of budgets. He then shows that the sequence of rationalizing preferences, each rationalizing a finite (but increasing) set of observations, converges to the unique preference that rationalizes the demand function. There are many differences between Mas-Colell's exercise and ours, even if one restricts attention to choice over bundles of finitely-many, divisible, con- sumption goods. In particular, the difference in model primitives -- demand instead of binary comparisons -- is crucial. One cannot generally use choice from linear budgets to recreate any given binary comparison. Moreover, there is no property analogous to the boundary and Lipschitz continuity of demand in our framework. Indeed, as shown in Mas-Colell (1977), by means of an example due to Lloyd Shapley, without these properties, preferences are not identified from demand.2 In Mas-Colell's paper, weak and strong rationaliz- ability coincide, as he works with demand functions. In this paper, we are particularly interested in partial observability. Also working with demand functions, the recent stream of literature by Reny (2015), Kubler and Polemarchakis (2017) and Polemarchakis et al. (2017) pro- vide results on the limiting behavior of finite-data utility rationalizations. These papers focus on the convergence of certain utility constructions that rationalize finite demand data. In contrast, our main results are about the 2Shapley's example also appears in Rader (1972). The example poses no problem for identi- fication in our framework of binary comparisons. It generates non-identification of demand because two preferences have the same marginal rate of substitution at the sampled points. With binary comparisons, the differences between two such preferences are detected. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 7 convergence of (any) rationalizing preferences. There are also important differ- ences between the primitives assumed in our paper and the demand functions assumed in these papers. The recent paper by Gorno (2017) also looks at the identification of pref- erences from abstract choice behavior. A clear difference between Gorno's exercise and ours is that we consider the limiting behavior of large, but fi- nite, experiments. His paper deals with preference identification from a given choice behavior on a fixed choice set. While the two papers are concerned with related questions, the exercises are quite different and the results are not related. Finally, on the technical level, we use the topology on preferences introduced by Hildenbrand (1970) and Kannai (1970), building on the work of Debreu (1954). In our study of the mapping from utility to preference, we borrow ideas from Mas-Colell (1974) and Border and Segal (1994). In particular, the proof of the continuity of the "certainty equivalent" representation is analogous to Mas-Colell's, and we take the notion of local strictness from Border and Segal, as well as their continuity result. 2. Model In this section, we introduce the definitions and conventions used throughout the paper, and present our main model. Our focus in this section is on two classical environments; namely, consumption space and Anscombe-Aumann acts. 2.1. Basic definitions and notational conventions. Let Xi be a set par- tially ordered by ≥i, for i = 1, . . . , n.3 If x, y ∈ Πn i=1Xi, then x ≥ y means that xi ≥i yi for i = 1, . . . , n; and x > y that x ≥ y and x 6= y. We write x ≫ y when xi >i yi for i = 1, . . . , n. The order ≥ on Πn i=1Xi is called the product order.4 The interval [a, b] in Πn i=1Xi : b ≥ z ≥ a}. An open interval (a, b) denotes the set {z ∈ Πn i=1Xi : b ≫ z ≫ a}. When Xi = R, and ≥i is the usual order on the real numbers, the above definitions i=1Xi denotes the set {z ∈ Πn 3A partial order is reflexive, transitive, and anti-symmetric, while a strict partial order is irreflexive, transitive, and asymmetric. 4Then ≥ is a partial order, and each of > and ≫ are strict partial orders. 8 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT constitute the familiar ordering on Rn, as well as the usual notions of intervals and open intervals. If A ⊆ R is a Borel set, we write ∆(A) for the set of all Borel probability measures on A. We endow ∆(A) with the weak* topology. For x, y ∈ ∆(A), we write x ≥F OSD y when x is larger than on y in the sense of first order stochas- tic dominance (meaning that RA f dx ≥ RA f dy for all monotone increasing, continuous and bounded functions f on A). When Ω is a finite set, we shall use the above definitions to order ∆(A)Ω by the product order defined from ordering ∆(A) by first-order stochastic dominance. For an integer n, [n] denotes the set {1, . . . , n}. So ∆([n]) = {x ∈ Rn i=1 xi = 1} is the simplex in Rn. + : Pn 2.1.1. Preference relations. Let X be a set. Given a binary relation R ⊆ X ×X, we write x R y when (x, y) ∈ R. And we say that a function u : X → R represents R if x R y iff u(x) ≥ u(y). A preference, or preference relation, is a weak order; i.e. a binary relation over X which is complete and transitive.. For a partial order ≥ on X, a preference (cid:23) on X is weakly monotone (with respect to ≥) if x ≥ y implies that x (cid:23) y. For a strict partial order > on X, a preference (cid:23) on X is strictly monotone (with respect to >) if x > y implies that x ≻ y.5 A binary relation R is continuous if R ⊆ X × X is closed (see, for example, Bergstrom et al., 1976). The set of continuous binary relations over X, when X is a topological space, is endowed with the topology of closed convergence, we provide a definition in Section 5.1. It is the natural topology for our purposes because it is the weakest topology for which optimal behavior is continuous. Under the assumptions of our paper, the topology of closed convergence is the smallest topology for which the sets {(x, y, (cid:23)) : x ≻ y} are open (see Kannai, 1970, Theorem 3.1). So it is the weakest topology with the following property: Suppose that a subject with preferences (cid:23) chooses x 5The strict part of a partial order is a strict partial order, but sometimes we are interested in other partial orders. For example, ≫ is not the strict part of ≥, but we use it later. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 9 over y (x ≻ y), and that another subject with sufficiently close preferences (cid:23)′ face a choice between x′ and y′, where (x′, y′) is sufficiently close to (x, y), then the second subject must choose x′ over y′ (x′ ≻′ y′). In other words, the optimal behavior according to (cid:23)′ approximates the optimal behavior according to (cid:23). In this sense, the topology that we impose on preferences is natural in any investigation of optimal choice. 2.1.2. Choice functions. A pair (Σ, c) is a choice function if Σ ⊆ 2X \ {∅} is a collection of nonempty subsets of X, and c : Σ → 2X with ∅ 6= c(A) ⊆ A for all A ∈ Σ. When Σ, the domain of c, is implied, we refer to c as a choice function. A choice function (Σ, c) is generated by a preference relation (cid:23) if c(A) = {x ∈ A : x (cid:23) y for all y ∈ B}, for all A ∈ Σ. The notation (Σ, c(cid:23)) means that the choice function (Σ, c(cid:23)) is generated by the preference relation (cid:23) on X. 2.2. The model. There is an experimenter (a female) and a subject (a male). The subject chooses among alternatives in a set X of possible alternatives. The subjects' choices are guided by a preference (cid:23)∗ over X, which we refer to as data-generating preference. The experimenter seeks to infer (cid:23)∗ from the subject's choices in a finite experiment. In a finite experiment, the subject is presented with finitely many unordered pairs of alternatives Bk = {xk, yk} in X. For every pair Bk, the subject is asked to choose one of the two alternatives: xk or yk. A sequence of experiments is a collection Σ∞ = {Bi}i∈N of pairs of possible k=1Bk choices presented to the subject. Let Σk = {B1, . . . , Bk}, and let B = ∪∞ be the set of all alternatives that are used over all the experiments. We make two assumptions on Σ∞. The first is that B is dense in X. The second is that, for any x, y ∈ B there is k for which Bk = {x, y}. The first assumption is obviously needed to obtain any general identification result (see 10 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Section 4.5). The second assumption means that the experimenter is able to elicit the subject's choices over all pairs used in her experiment.6 2.2.1. The data and its rationalizations. For each k, the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ generates a choice function (Σk, c(cid:23)∗). Thus the choice behavior observed by the experimenter is always consistent with (Σk, c(cid:23)∗). We term (Σk, c(cid:23)∗) the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗, and we term the choice function (Σ∞, c(cid:23)∗) the choice sequence of order k generated by (cid:23)∗. Sometimes, we may not be able to observe the subject's entire choice func- tion. In the spirit of Afriat (1967), we want to allow for the possibility that the subject may in principle be willing to choose x, but does not actually choose it. In the language of Chambers et al. (2014), we want to study the concept of partial observability. To this end, a general choice function (Σ∞, c) is termed a choice sequence and this induces, for every k, a choice function on Σk. For a choice function c and a preference (cid:23)∗, we use the notation c ⊑ c(cid:23)∗ to mean that for each budget Bk, c(Bk) ⊆ c(cid:23)∗(Bk); i.e., the observed choices from Bk are optimal for (cid:23)∗. In the context of partial observability, the notion of rationalization needs to accommodate the fact that some preference maximal alternatives may not have actually been chosen. The next concept captures such an accommodation; and is again in the spirit of Afriat (1967). A preference (cid:23)k weakly rationalizes (Σk, c) if, for all Bi ∈ Σk, c(Bi) ⊆ c(cid:23)k(Bi). A preference (cid:23)k weakly rationalizes a choice sequence (Σ∞, c) if it rationalizes the choice function of order k (Σk, c), for all k ≥ 1. The following concept is analogous to the notion of rationalization discussed in Richter (1966), and is the appropriate notion when it is known that all potentially chosen alternatives are actually chosen. A preference (cid:23)k strongly rationalizes (Σk, c) if, for all Bi ∈ Σk, c(Bi) = c(cid:23)k(Bi). A preference (cid:23)k strongly rationalizes a choice sequence (Σ∞, c) if it rationalizes the choice function of order k (Σk, c), for all k ≥ 1. 6If there is a countable dense A ⊆ X, then one can always construct such a sequence of experiments via a standard diagonalization argument. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 11 3. Results 3.1. Motivation. Many results on identification in economics presume access to rich information. In decision theory, the presumption is that one can observe enough of the subject's choices so as to effectively know the subject's preference (cid:23)∗. In this section, we point to some problems with this assumption. Let (cid:23)I= X × X denote the degenerate preference relation that regards any two alternatives as indifferent. Proposition 1. Let X = [a, b] ⊆ Rn, where a ≪ b. Let the subject's prefer- ence (cid:23)∗ be continuous. There exists a continuous preference (cid:23)k that strongly rationalizes the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗, and such that (cid:23)k→(cid:23)I. The proof of Proposition 1 is relegated to Appendix B. Proposition 1 means that, absent further conditions, the sequence of ra- tionalizations can be very different from the preference (cid:23)∗ generating the subject's choices. It is possible to choose rationalizations that converge to full indifference among all alternatives, regardless of which (cid:23)∗ really gener- ated the subject's choices. The objective of our paper is to show how such problems can be avoided. Proposition 1 suggests another distinction. There is "infinite data" in the form of the data-generating preference (cid:23)∗, such data is commonly assumed in decision theory; there is finite data, in the form of (Σk, c∗ (cid:23)); and, "limiting data," which would be (cid:23)∗ B, i.e., the preference (cid:23)∗ restricted to domain B. With limiting data one would be able to identify (cid:23)∗. Indeed, we show in Section 3.5 that if (cid:23) B =(cid:23)∗ B then (cid:23)=(cid:23)∗. Therefore, Proposition 1 illustrates a sort of discontinuity. If one only had access to limiting data, there would be no problem. However, with arbitrarily large, but finite, data, preference rationalizations can be completely wrong. 3.2. Weak rationalizations. We now present a series of simple sufficient conditions ensuring convergence of preference rationalizations to the subject's preference. The results are discussed in Section 4. 12 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Let X = Rn +. Recall that the strict partial order ≫ on Rn + refers to the relation x ≫ y if for each i, xi > yi (i.e. the product of >); strict monotonicity refers to this relation. Theorem 2. Let the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ be continuous and strictly mono- tone. Suppose that c ⊑ c(cid:23)∗. For each k ∈ N, let (cid:23)k be a continuous and strictly monotone preference that weakly rationalizes (Σk, c). Then, (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗. Theorem 2 can be generalized, as (cid:23)∗ and (cid:23)k do not need to be transitive. They only need to be continuous, strictly monotone, and complete. 3.3. Strong rationalization. Suppose that X is either (1) Rn +, (2) or ∆([a, b])Ω for a finite set Ω and [a, b] ⊆ R. Recall that we topologize ∆([a, b]) with its weak* topology, and ∆([a, b])Ω with the product topology. In the case of Rn +, the relation ≥ refers to the product of ≥ on each of the coordinates, and on ∆([a, b])Ω, it is the product of ≥F OSD. Theorem 3. Let the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ be weakly monotone. For each k ∈ N, let (cid:23)k be a continuous and weakly monotone preference that strongly rationalizes the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗. Then, (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗. 3.4. Utility functions. Let X be either of the sets in Section 3.3. In the case of ∆([a, b])Ω, > references the strict part of ≥ as defined previously. Denote by Rmon the set of preferences that are strictly monotone and con- tinuous, and by U the set of strictly increasing and continuous utility functions on X. The set U is endowed with the topology of uniform convergence on com- pacta. Let Φ be the function that carries each utility function in U into the pref- erence relation that it represents. So Φ : U → Rmon is such that x Φ(u) y if and only if u(x) ≥ u(y). We regard two utility functions as equivalent if they represent the same preference: if they are ordinally equivalent. Define an equivalence relation ≃ on U by u ≃ v if there exists ϕ : R → R strictly increasing for which u = ϕ ◦ v. Then let U/ ≃ denote the set of equivalence classes of U under ≃ endowed with PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 13 the quotient topology. The function Φ : U/ ≃→ Rmon maps an equivalence class into Φ(u), for any u member of the equivalence class. Theorem 4. Φ is a homeomorphism. Theorem 4 implies that a utility representation may be chosen from a finite- experiment rationalization so as to approximate a given utility representation for the preference generating the choices. The following Proposition adds some structure to Theorem 4. It claims a lower hemicontinuity result for Φ−1, in the sense that for any utility represen- tation of a strictly monotone preference, a convergent sequence of preferences possesses a convergent sequence of utility representations. Proposition 5. Let the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ be strictly monotone and con- tinuous. Let (cid:23)k be a continuous and strictly monotone preference that strongly rationalizes the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗. Then, for any util- ity representation u∗ of (cid:23)∗, there exist utility representations uk of (cid:23)k such that uk → u∗. 3.5. Limiting data. Let X be as in Section 3.3, and let B be the dense set of alternatives used over all experiments. Theorem 6. Suppose that (cid:23) and (cid:23)∗ are two continuous preference relations. If (cid:23) B×B =(cid:23)∗ B×B, then (cid:23)=(cid:23)∗. As we discussed in Section 3.1, the case of limiting data serves to illustrate the difference between a sequence of finite experiment and the limit of a count- ably infinite dataset. Theorem 6 means that one can obtain identification of (cid:23)∗ solely from the continuity assumption (we refer the reader to Section 8 for more details). 4. Discussion 4.1. Positive results and assumptions on X. The previous section as- + or ∆([a, b])Ω, for some finite set Ω. The point sumes that X is either Rn of Theorems 2 and 3 is to provide a positive result in response to the con- cerns raised in Section 3.1. The results cover some of the most widely used 14 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT choice spaces in economics: Rn ∆([a, b])Ω is a space of Anscombe-Aumann acts over monetary lotteries. + is consumption space in demand theory, and For the Anscombe-Aumann interpretation, let Ω be a finite nonempty set of states of the world, and interpret [a, b] as a set of monetary payoffs. The elements of ∆([a, b]) are lotteries of monetary payoffs. An Anscombe-Aumann act is a state-contingent monetary lottery; it maps elements from Ω to ∆([a, b]). The set of alternatives ∆([a, b])Ω is then the set all Anscombe-Aumann acts. + and ∆([a, b])Ω have in common that there is an objective notion of monotonicity that preferences can be made to conform to. Other spaces share this property. Section 5 includes our most general results. The spaces Rn 4.2. Identification of utility functions. Many results on identification in decision theory can be phrased in the following terms. There are subsets U ′ ⊆ U and R′ ⊆ Rmon, and an equivalence relation ≃′ on U ′ such that Φ is a bijection from U ′/ ≃′ onto R′. The idea is that, with data in the form of (cid:23)∗, one can uniquely "back out" an equivalence class from U ′. Our results suggest that this is not enough when data is finite. First, one needs to ensure that rationalizations obtained from finite data converge to the underlying (cid:23)∗. Second, the space of preferences and utilities have to be homeomorphic in order to be able to obtain a limiting utility function from a large, but finite, dataset on choices. 4.3. Partial observability. The distinction between weak and strong ratio- nalizability is important. In fact, it is rather surprising that one can obtain a result such as Theorem 2 for weak rationalizations. A choice sequence generated by the subject's preference reflects both strict comparisons as well as indifferences. In practice, however, the experimenter may not be able to properly infer the indifference of the subject regarding two alternatives. The difficulty arises, for example, when the experimenter offers the subject his preferred alternative. In this case, the experimenter would typically require that the subject selects only one of the two alternatives presented to him. Such situations, in which the experimenter cannot commit to being able to see all potentially chosen elements, are referred to partial PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 15 observability (Chambers et al., 2014), in contrast to full observability in which the experimenter is able to elicit the subject's indifference between alternatives. Weak rationalizability expresses the idea that the experimenter is not willing to commit to interpreting observed choices as the only potential choices made by the subject. For example, if the experimenter observes that the subject chooses x when presented the pair {x, y}, she may not be willing to infer that x ≻∗ y, as it may be that x ∼∗ y but the subject simply did not choose y. This notion of weak rationalization is used, for example, by Afriat (1967) in the context of consumer theory (for more details on this notion, see, for example, Chambers and Echenique (2016)).7 Weak rationalizability is partially agnostic with respect to the status of unchosen alternatives, so it is surprising that one can ensure convergence of preference rationalizations to the preference that generated the choices. 4.4. Monotone Preferences. The problem exemplified by Proposition 1 is that one cannot hope to obtain convergence to (cid:23)∗ if there is no discipline placed on the rationalizing preferences. In a sense, we need to constrain, or structure, the theory from which rationalizations are drawn. Our results show that a notion of objective monotonicity is enough to ensure that rationalizing preferences in the limit approach the subject's preferences. As discussed in the introduction, and exemplified by Proposition 1, the continuity assumption on the subject's preference, and the assumption that the alternatives offered are in the limit dense, do not generally ensure convergence to the subject's preference. Proposition 1 shows that the failure of convergence can be rather dramatic. We must impose structure on the subject's preference, and on the finite-experiment rationalizations. Observe that the preferences (cid:23)k constructed in Proposition 1 cannot be monotone. Suppose that (cid:23)∗ is a continuous preference relation, and suppose that x ≻∗ y. In the construction in Proposition 1 we obtain a sequence of rationalizations (cid:23)k such that in the limit y is at least as good as x. This cannot happen if each rationalizing preference is weakly monotone: x ≻∗ y implies 7Analogously, the hypothesis of full observability, related to what we call strong rationaliza- tion, is the notion employed by Richter (1966). A recent work showing how to obtain both types of conditions as a special case is Nishimura et al. (2017). 16 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT that x′ ≻∗ y′ for (x′, y′) close enough to (x, y). Thanks to the interaction of the order and the topology on Rn we can find a k large enough such that there are {x′′, y′′} ∈ Σk (meaning alternatives offered in the kth finite experiment) with x′ ≥ x′′ and y′′ ≥ y′, and where (x′′, y′′) is also close to (x, y). If (cid:23)k is monotone then we have x′ (cid:23)k x′′ and y′′ (cid:23) y′. But if (cid:23)k strongly rationalizes the choices made at the kth experiment, then x′′ ≻k y′′. So we have to have x′ ≻k y′ for any (x′, y′) close enough to (x, y). 4.5. On the denseness of B. We assume that B, the set of all alterna- tives used in a sequence of experiments, is dense. Our paper deals with fully nonparametric identification, so it seems impossible to obtain a general result without assuming denseness of B: imagine that the experimenter leaves an open set of alternatives outside of her experimental design. Then the subject's preferences over alternatives in that set would be very hard to gauge. In practice, one can imagine restricting attention to smaller class of fami- lies for which one does not need to elicit choices over a set that is dense in X. For example for expected utility preferences over lotteries, or homothetic preferences in Rn, one is only trying to infer a single indifference curve. So a smaller set of choices is enough: but even in that case one would need the set of alternatives in the limit to be dense in the smaller set of choices. 4.6. Preference identification and utility identification. The theorems say, roughly speaking, that, if we assume data generated by a (well behaved) preference (cid:23)∗, then any "finite sample rationalization" (cid:23)k is guaranteed to converge to the generating preference. So estimates have the correct "large sample" properties. In particular, one may be interested in a specific theory of choice, such as max-min or Choquet expected utility. If the subject's (cid:23)∗ is max-min, or Choquet, one can choose rationalizing preferences to conform to the theory, and the limit will uniquely identify the subject's max-min, or Choquet, preference. But if one incorrectly uses rationalizing preferences out- side of the theory, the asymptotic behavior will still correct the problem, and uniquely identify (cid:23)∗ in the limit. The theorems also say that there are certain utility representations uk that will be correct asymptotically. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 17 Note, however, what the theorems do not say. First, the estimates (cid:23)k are guaranteed to converge to the generating preferences (cid:23)∗, when the generating preference is known to exist. If one simply estimates the preferences (cid:23)k, these may fail to converge to a well-behaved preference. We present two examples to this effect in Section 9. That said, under certain conditions (that unfortunately are not satisfied in the Anscombe-Aumann setting), the "size" of the set of rationalizing preferences shrinks as k growth; see Theorem 10. Second, our results do not say that one can choose uk arbitrarily. Any estimated rationalizing preference will converge to the preferences rationalizing the utility, but basing the estimation on utilities is more complicated because it is not clear that any utility representation of (cid:23)∗ will have the right limit, or even converge at all. 5. General Results In Section 3, we have presented our main results for some important special cases of the collection of alternatives X. In this section, we present our main results for the general case. We now assume that X is a Polish and locally compact space, and provide conditions under which our convergence results continue to hold. The conditions we provide are the weakest we know. The section concludes with applications to this general case. Note that this section focuses on preference identification, general results for utility identification are given in Section 6. 5.1. Convergence of Preferences. To speak about the approximation of the subject's preference, one must introduce a notion of convergence on the space of preferences. We use closed convergence, and endow the space of preference relations with the associated topology. The use of closed convergence for pref- erence relations was initiated by the work of Kannai (1970) and Hildenbrand (1970), and has become standard since then. One primary reason to adopt closed convergence is to capture the property that agents with similar preferences should have similar choice behavior -- a property that is necessary to be able to learn the preference from finite data. Specifically, under the assumptions we use for most of our results, the topology 18 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT of closed convergence is the smallest topology for which the sets {(x, y, (cid:23)) : x ≻ y} are open (see Kannai (1970) Theorem 3.1). The desired continuity of choice behavior is expressed by the fact that sets of the form {(x, y, (cid:23)) : x ≻ y} are open. The topology of closed convergence being the smallest topology with this property is a natural reason for adopting it. The following characterization of closed convergence for the context of pref- erence relations will be used throughout the paper: Lemma 7. Let (cid:23)n be a sequence of preference relations, and let (cid:23) be a pref- erence relation. Then (cid:23)n→(cid:23) in the topology of closed convergence if and only if, for all x, y ∈ X, (1) x (cid:23) y implies that for any neighborhood V of (x, y) in X × X there is N such that for all n ≥ N, (cid:23)n ∩V 6= ∅; (2) if, for any neighborhood V of (x, y) in X × X, and any N there is n ≥ N with (cid:23)n ∩V 6= ∅, then x (cid:23) y. The following lemma plays an important role in the approximation results. Lemma 8. The set of all continuous binary relations on X, endowed with the topology of closed convergence, is a compact metrizable space. Proof. See Theorem 2 (Chapter B) of Hildenbrand (2015), or Corollary 3.95 of Aliprantis and Border (2006). (cid:3) In particular, we shall denote the metric which generates the closed conver- gence topology by δC. Recall that X is metrizable. Let d be an associated metric. When X is compact, one can choose δC to be the Hausdorff metric on subsets of X × X induced by d. On the other hand, if X is only locally com- pact, then δC may be chosen to coincide with the Hausdorff metric on subsets of X∞ × X∞, where X∞ is the one-point compactification of X together with some metric generating X∞. See Aliprantis and Border (2006) for details. 5.2. Weak rationalizations. We now present our results on the asymptotic behavior of preference estimates based on finite data. The results generalize those stated in Section 3. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 19 For our first result, we must define two notions. We say that a preference relation (cid:23) is locally strict if for every x, y ∈ X with x (cid:23) y, and every neigh- borhood V of (x, y) in X × X there is (x′, y′) ∈ V with x′ ≻ y′. The first main result gives conditions of convergence of preferences that weakly rationalize the experimental observations. Note that Theorem 9 gen- eralizes Theorem 2. Theorem 9. Suppose that (1) the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ is continuous and strictly monotone, (2) the strict partial order < is an open set, (3) every continuous and strictly monotone preference relation is locally strict. Let c ⊑ c(cid:23)∗ be a choice sequence, and let (cid:23)k be a continuous and strictly monotone preference that weakly rationalizes ck. Then, (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗ in the closed convergence topology. Note that the assumption that (cid:23)∗ and (cid:23)k are transitive is not needed. Instead, each of these only needs to be continuous, strictly monotone, and complete. Note that Theorem 9 requires the existence of the data-generating preference (cid:23)∗. However, even if existence of this object is not supposed, we can still "bound" the set of rationalizations to an arbitrary degree of precision. This is the point of the next result. For a choice sequence c, let P k(c) be the set of continuous and strictly monotone preferences that weakly rationalize ck. For a set of binary relations S, define diam(S) = sup((cid:23),(cid:23)′)∈S 2 δC((cid:23), (cid:23)′) to be the diameter of S according to the metric δC which generates the topology on preferences. Theorem 10. Suppose that < has open intervals. Let c be a choice sequence, and suppose that each strictly monotone continuous preference is also locally strict. Then one of the following holds: (1) There is k such that P k(c) = ∅. (2) limk→∞ diam(P k(c)) → 0. 20 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT That is, either a choice sequence is eventually not weakly rationalizable by a strictly monotone preference, or, the set of rationalizations becomes arbitrarily small. Note that, as for Theorem 9, Theorem 10 can dispense with the notion of transitivity. In this case, we would define P k(c) to be the set of (potentially nontransitive) complete, continuous, and strongly monotone relations weakly rationalizing ck. 5.3. Strong rationalizations. Say that the set X, together with the col- lection of finite experiments Σ∞, has the countable order property if for each x ∈ X and each neighborhood V of x in X there is x′, x′′ ∈ B ∩ V with x′ ≤ x ≤ x′′. We say that X has the squeezing property if for any conver- gent sequence {xn}n in X, if xn → x∗ then there is an increasing sequence {x′ n, and limn→∞ x′ n}n, and an a decreasing sequence {x′′ n = x∗ = limn→∞ x′′ n. n}n, such that x′ n ≤ xn ≤ x′′ Theorem 11. Suppose that (1) the subject's preference (cid:23)∗ is weakly monotone, (2) (X, Σ∞) has the countable order property, and X the squeezing prop- erty. Let (cid:23)k be a continuous and weakly monotone preference that strongly ratio- nalizes the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗. Then, (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗ in the closed convergence topology. The countable order and squeezing properties are technical but not vacu- ous. Importantly, as stated below in Proposition 12, they are satisfied for two common cases of interest discussed in Section 3.3. Therefore, Theorem 11 generalizes Theorem 3. Proposition 12. If either (1) the set of alternatives X is Rn endowed with the order of weak vector dominance, or (2) the set of alternatives X is ∆([a, b]) endowed with the order of weak first-order stochastic dominance, PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 21 then X has the squeezing property, and there is Σ∞ such that (X, Σ∞) has the countable order property. One key element behind the above two results is a natural order on the sets of possible alternatives. Via monotonicity, the order adds structure to the families of preferences under consideration. Crucially, the order also relates to the topology on the set X. 5.4. Applications. We have already highlighted the application of our results to Euclidean consumption spaces and Anscombe-Aumann acts over monetary lotteries (see Section 3). Here we discuss two other domains of application of our results. 5.4.1. Lotteries over a finite prize space. Let Π be a finite prize space. The objects of choice are the elements of X = ∆(Π). Fix a strict ranking of the elements of Π, and enumerate the elements of Π so that π1 is ranked above π2, which is ranked above π3, and so on. Then the elements of X can be ordered with respect to first-order stochastic dominance: x is larger than y in this order if the probability of each set {π1, . . . , πk} is at least as large under x than under y, for all k = 1, . . . , Π. A preference over X is monotone if it always prefer larger lotteries over smaller ones.8 Suppose that choices are generated by an expected utility preference (cid:23)∗. The fact that (cid:23)∗ belongs to the expected utility family implies that there are rationalizing expected utility preference (cid:23)k, for each finite experiment k. Then, the above results ensure that these converge to (cid:23)∗. Of course the same would be true of any (monotone and continuous) rationalizing preference: any mode mis-specification would be corrected in the limit. In other words, any arbitrary sequence of rationalization has the data-generating preference (cid:23)∗ as its limit. 5.4.2. Dated rewards. We can apply our theory to intertemporal choice. Specif- ically to the choice of dated rewards (Fishburn and Rubinstein (1982)). The set of elements of choice is R2 + is interpreted as a mone- tary payment of x delivered on date t. Endow R2 + with the order ≤i whereby +. A point (x, t) ∈ R2 8The objective order on Π is not really needed in this case; see Example 19. The point of the example is to illustrate Theorem 9. 22 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT (x, t) ≤i (x′, t′) if x ≤ x′ and t′ ≤ t. Monotonicity of preferences means that more money earlier is preferred to less money later. Now one can postulate a preference (cid:23)∗ such that (x′, t′) (cid:23)∗ (x, t) iff δtv(x) ≤ δt′v(x′), for some δ ∈ (0, 1) and a strictly increasing function v : R+ → R. This means that (cid:23)∗ follows the exponential discounting model. Again, any finite experiment would be rationalizable by exponential preference, and these would converge to the limiting (cid:23)∗. 6. Identification of Utility Functions In this section, we investigate the relation between preferences and util- ity. Preferences remain topologized with the closed convergence topology. We study continuous utility representations, and ask when the identification of a preference allows the identification of a utility (or conversely). We show that if we endow the set of continuous utility functions with the topology of uniform convergence on compacta, then convergence in one sense is equivalent to con- vergence in the other. Formally, we establish that there is a homeomorphism between the two spaces (when we identify two utility functions representing the same preference relation). Throughout this section, the space of possible alternatives X is connected (and remains a locally compact Polish space, as described in our model). Con- nectedness is imposed so that every continuous preference admits a continuous representation, as in Debreu (1954). We denote by U the set of strictly increasing and continuous utility func- tions on X. Similarly, Rmon denotes the set of preferences which are strictly monotone and continuous. Suppose the existence of a set M ⊆ X, satisfying the following conditions: • M has at least two distinct elements; M is connected and totally or- In other words x, y ∈ M and x 6= y implies x < y or dered by <. y < x. • For any m ∈ M and any neighborhood U of m in X there is m, m ∈ M, with m ∈ [m, m] ⊆ U. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 23 Moreover if m is not the largest element of M we can choose m such that m < m, and if m is not the smallest element we can choose m such that m < m. • Any bounded sequence in X is bounded by elements of M. That is, for any bounded sequence {xn} there are m and m and k large so that m ≤ xn ≤ m. Let Φ : U → Rmon such that Φ(u) is the preference represented by u ∈ U.9 We provide two examples below that demonstrate the property just men- tioned for the case of alternatives of the form X = ∆([a, b]) and X = ∆([a, b])n. Example 13. Let X = ∆([a, b]) be the set of Borel probability distributions on a real compact interval S = [a, b] ⊆ R. Endow X with the weak* topology and let ≤ be first-order stochastic dominance. Observe that X is compact, metrizable, and separable (Theorems 15.11 and 15.12 of Aliprantis and Border (2006)). Observe also that X has the countable order property (see Lemma 28 in Appendix C). Let < be the strict part of ≤. Identify S with degenerate probability distri- butions, so that s ∈ S denotes the element of X that assigns probability 1 to {s}, say δs. Let M = S. The relative topology on S coincides with the usual topology, so S is connected. Note that a ≤ x ≤ b for any x ∈ X. Let m ∈ M and U be a neighborhood of m in X. For each x ∈ X, let F x be the cdf associated to x. Choose ε such that the ball Bε(m) (in the Levy metric) with center m and radius ε is contained in U. Let ε′ < ε. Then if y ∈ [m − ε′, m + ε′] we have that F y(s − ε) − ε ≤ F m−ε′ (s − ε) − ε < 1 = F m(s) if s − ε ≥ m − ε′ F y(s − ε) − ε ≤ F m−ε′ (s − ε) − ε = −ε < F m(s) if s − ε < m − ε′ Similarly, F m(s) = 0 < F m+ε(s + ε) + ε ≤ F y(s + ε) + ε if s + ε ≤ m + ε′ F m(s) < 1 + ε = F m+ε′ (s + ε) + ε ≤ F y(s + ε) + ε if s + ε > m + ε′. 9That is, x Φ(u) y if and only if u(x) ≥ u(y). 24 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT These inequalities mean that y ∈ Bε(m). Thus [m − ε′, m + ε′] ⊆ U, as y was arbitrary. Example 14. Let Ω be a nonempty set such that Ω < +∞. Suppose Ω represents a set of states of the world. Then ∆([a, b])Ω, endowed with the product weak* topology, and ordered by the product order, of Ω copies of first order stochastic dominance, represents the set of Anscombe-Aumann acts, Anscombe and Aumann (1963). Let S = {(δs, . . . , δs) : s ∈ [a, b]}; the con- stant acts whose outcomes are degenerate lotteries. Let M = S, as in the previous example; and all topological properties satisfied there are also satis- fied here. The following results generalize those derived originally by Mas-Colell (1974), who worked with Rn +. Theorem 15. Φ is an open map. Theorem 16. (Border and Segal (1994) Thm 8) Let (X, d) be a locally com- pact and separable metric space and R be the space of continuous preference relations on X, endowed with the topology of closed convergence. If (cid:23)u= Φ(u) is locally strict, then Φ is continuous at u. If M has no isolated points, and Φ is continuous at u, then (cid:23)u is locally strict. Define an equivalence relation ≃ on U by u ≃ v if there exists ϕ : R → R strictly increasing for which u = ϕ ◦ v. Then let U/ ≃ denote the set of equivalence classes of U under ≃ endowed with the quotient topology; the equivalence class of u ∈ U is written [u]. The map Φ : U/ ≃→ Rmon is defined in the natural way, via Φ([u]) = Φ(u).10 Theorem 17. Φ is a homeomorphism. Given the discussion of Example 13, Theorem 17 generalizes Theorem 4. The role of M in the case of Rn + is played by the equal-coordinates ray. It is also straightforward to apply Theorem 17 to intertemporal choice by way of the model of dated rewards (see Section 5.4.2, by letting M be the line {(x, 0) : x ≥ 0}. 10Observe that this function is well-defined. If v ∈ [u], then there is strictly increasing ϕ for which v = ϕ ◦ u, hence v and u represent the same preference. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 25 7. Non-monotone preferences and local strictness When the set of utility functions is compact, we can obtain a particularly strong result that does not rely on monotonicity, or the existence of a preference relation generating the choices. Instead, the generating preference is obtained endogenously as the limit of rationalizing preferences.11 Let V be a compact set of continuous functions in the topology of compact convergence, and let Φ(V) denote the image of V under Φ, so that Φ(u) is the preference represented by u. Theorem 18. Suppose V is compact, and that all (cid:23)∈ Φ(V) are locally strict. Let c be a choice sequence, and let (cid:23)k∈ V weakly rationalize ck. Then, there exists (cid:23)∗∈ Φ(V) such that (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗ in the closed convergence topology. Fur- thermore, if (cid:23)′ k also weakly rationalizes ck, then (cid:23)′ k→(cid:23)∗. Observe that knowledge of a generating preference (cid:23)∗ is not required; but the hypothesis that there is a weak rationalization (cid:23)k for every ck suggests the possibility. Theorem 18 implies that one can sometimes obtain asymptotically utility rationalizations drawn from V. In particular, when V is compact, Φ(V) consists of locally strict preferences, and Φ is a homeomorphism then Φ−1((cid:23)k) ∈ V converges to a utility for (cid:23)∗ in V. One application of this kind is in Example 19. Example 19. Let X be a finite set, and let ∆(X) be the lotteries on X (topologized as elements of Euclidean space). Consider the set of nonconstant expected utility preferences. Then the hypotheses of Theorem 18 hold here. To see this, observe that the set of nonconstant von Neumann-Morgenstern utility indices is homeomorphic to the set S = {u ∈ RX : X ux = 0, kuk = 1}. x It is straightforward to see that the map φ : S → C(∆(X)) given by φ(u)(p) = Px uxp(x) is continuous. So, let V = φ(S) which is compact; then the set Φ(V) is the set of nontrivial expected utility preferences. Finally, observe that each nonconstant expected utility preference is locally strict. For, if (cid:23) is 11In particular, these results should be contrasted with the example in Section 9.1. 26 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT nonconstant, then there are p, q ∈ ∆(X) for which p ≻ q. Then for any r (cid:23) s, for any α > 0, αp + (1 − α)r ≻ αq + (1 − α)s. Choose α small to be within any neighborhood of (r, s). Next, Example 20 allows for an infinite set of prices, but restricts von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities to have lower and upper Lipschitz bounds. Example 20. We can consider Rn a, b ∈ R with 0 < a < b. +, and a class of utility functions U b a, where U b a = {u ∈ C(Rn +) : ∀i∧∀(xi < yi), a(yi−xi) ≤ u(yi, x−i)−u(xi, x−i) ≤ b(yi−xi)}. Observe that U b a ⊆ U, and consists of those members satisfying a certain Lipschitz property (namely, Lipschitz boundedness above and below). By the Arzela-Ascoli Theorem (see Dugundji (1966), Theorem 6.4), U b a is compact. Furthermore, each (cid:23)∈ Φ(U b a) is locally strict, as it is strictly monotonic. 8. Infinite and Countable Data In this section, we propose two sufficient conditions that enable the recovery of the subject's preference from its restriction to a countable set of data points. We first show below that if we can observe a subrelation of a locally strict and continuous binary relation on a dense set, then we can infer the entire binary relation. Theorem 21. Suppose that (cid:23) and (cid:23)′ are two complete, continuous, and lo- cally strict binary relations. Let B ⊆ X be dense. If (cid:23) B×B ⊆(cid:23)′ B×B, then (cid:23)=(cid:23)′. We then make no restriction on the preferences other than continuity, but requires the underlying space of alternatives to be connected. Theorem 22. Suppose that (cid:23) and (cid:23)′ are two continuous preference relations. Suppose X is connected, and let B ⊆ X be dense. If (cid:23) B×B =(cid:23)′ B×B, then (cid:23)=(cid:23)′. Note that Theorem 22 generalizes Theorem 6. Without connectedness, this result can fail. A preference (cid:23) can be increasing on (0, 1) ∪ (2, 3), but there PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 27 are two possible ways to extend it to [0, 1] ∪ [2, 3]; either by setting 1 ∼ 2, or 2 ≻ 1. A classical procedure, attributed to Allais (see Allais, 1953) allows one to elicit multiple choices with one suitably randomized choice. Roughly, one uses a randomization device whose outcome is a choice set, and asks a subject to announce what she would choose ex-ante from each of the sets in the support in the distribution. A decision maker who respects basic monotonicity postulates (see Azrieli et al., 2014) correctly announces each of their choices. If we can uncover an entire preference from each of these choices, then we are able to elicit an entire preference using one suitably chosen random device. Here, we do not investigate this theory in its full generality. But if there is a countable dense subset of alternatives, and a continuous preference can be inferred from its behavior on a countable dense subset, then we can utilize the Allais mechanism to uncover an entire preference with a single randomized choice. For example, we would enumerate the pairs of elements from the countable dense subset, say B1, B2, . . ., and randomize so that each one realizes with probability 2−k. 9. On the meaning of (cid:23)∗ Some economists are comfortable with the idea that an agent "has" a data- generating preference (cid:23)∗, and some are not. The former assume that the preference is something intrinsic to the agent, and that when presented with a choice situation the agent can access his preference and choose accordingly. Under this interpretation, our paper gives conditions under which a finite ex- periment can approximate, to an arbitrary degree of precision, the underlying preference that the agent uses to make choices. Other economists argue that preferences are just choices. For those in this position, it is meaningless to speak of a preference over pairs of alternatives from which the agent never chooses. We are sympathetic to this view, and our paper also contributes to this interpretation. Under proper conditions -- conditions that we provide in our paper -- continuity "defines" preferences over X given choices over a countable subset. This is important because estimated preferences provide a guide for making normative recommendations and out 28 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT of sample predictions. An economist may want to estimate (cid:23)∗ so as to make policy recommendations that are in the agent's interest; in fact, this is a common use of estimated preferences in applied work. Similarly, the economist may want to use (cid:23)∗ as an input in a structural economic model, and thereby make predictions for different configurations of the model. The existence and meaning of (cid:23)∗ is then provided for by the continuity assumption. Moreover, viewed from this angle, Theorem 10 allows us to say that the set of rationalizations can be made arbitrarily small as more and more data are observed.12 In this manner, one can bound errors in welfare statements or out of sample predictions to an arbitrary degree of precision. We conclude this section with two examples that illustrate the importance of postulating existence of an agent's preference: without the postulate, the inferred preference may otherwise fail to converge. 9.1. The set of weakly monotone preference relations is not closed. Suppose we are interested in rationality in the form of a strictly monotonic continuous preference relation. Observe that Theorems 9 and 11 hypothesize the existence of (cid:23)∗. If (cid:23)∗∈ Rmon, for example, then we know that, in the limit, rationalizing relations will be transitive if every (cid:23)k is. Unfortunately, we show in this section, if we do not know that (cid:23)∗ is transitive, we cannot ensure that it is, even if each (cid:23)k is. That is, we demonstrate a sequence (cid:23)k of strictly monotone preferences, where (cid:23)k→(cid:23)∗ in the closed convergence topology, but (cid:23)∗ is not transitive. The data are rationalizable, but the rationalization requires intransitive in- difference. So the properties of the rationalizations of order k cannot be pre- served. Figure 1 exhibits a non-transitive relation. The example is taken from Grodal (1974). The lines depict indifference curves, but all the green indif- ference curves intersect at one point: (1/2, 1/2). This makes the preference non-transitive; specifically the indifference part of the preference would be intransitive here. 12This is true in spite of the claim we make in Section 9.1. It is true that the set of rationalizations may "shrink" to something which is not transitive, but this set is shrinking nonetheless and always contains preference relations (except in the limit). PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 29 1/2 1/2 1/2 Figure 1. A non-transitive preference Now imagine a collection of binary comparisons that do not include (1/2, 1/2). Suppose that this collection is the limit of a finite number of binary compar- isons, making it at most countable. There must exist a ball around (1/2, 1/2) that does not include any of the comparisons. Consider the diagram in Fig- ure 2. The preferences have been modified close to (1/2, 1/2) so that transi- tivity holds. 1/2 This example is not particularly troubling, however. First, with finite exper- imentation, the violation of transitivity will never be "reached." Second, the violation here is not particularly egregious. Only transitivity of indifference is violated. This holds quite generally. It can be shown that any limit point of a sequence of preference relations must be quasitransitive, so that whenever x ≻ y and y ≻ z, it follows that x ≻ z.13 Quasitransitive relations enjoy many of the useful properties of preferences. For example, continuous quasitransitive relations possess maxima on compact sets, see e.g. Bergstrom (1975). 13The argument is in Grodal (1974), but to see this suppose that (cid:23)n→(cid:23), where each (cid:23)n is a preference relation. It can be shown that (cid:23) is complete, so suppose by means of contradiction that there are x, y, z ∈ X for which x ≻ y, y ≻ z, and z (cid:23) x. So, there are xn, z n for which z n (cid:23)n xn, xn → x, and z n → z. For each n, either z n (cid:23)n y or y (cid:23)n x, so that without loss, there is a sequence for which z n (cid:23)n y, i.e. z (cid:23) y, a contradiction. 30 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Figure 2. A transitive preference 9.2. The set of locally strict relations is not closed. Finally we present an example to show that the set of locally strict preference relations is not closed. Let X = [−3, −1] ∪ [1, 3]. For each n, let un(x) = −(x + 2)2 + 1 n on [−3, −1] and un(x) = (x − 2)2 − 1 n on [1, 3]. See Figure 3. The function un represents a locally strict relation (cid:23)n. Let u∗(x) be the pointwise limit of un; i.e. u∗(x) = −(x + 2)2 on [−3, −1] and u∗(x) = (x − 2)2 on [1, 3]. The function u∗ represents (cid:23)∗ which is not locally strict. Observe that −2 (cid:23)∗ 2, but for small neighborhoods there is no strict preference. However, it is also straightforward by checking cases to show that (cid:23)n→(cid:23)∗. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 31 Figure 3. The set of locally strict preferences is not closed. References Afriat, S. N. (1967): "The Construction of Utility Functions from Expen- diture Data," International Economic Review, 8, 67 -- 77. Aliprantis, C. D. and K. Border (2006): Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker's Guide, Springer Science & Business Media. Allais, M. (1953): "Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'´Ecole Am´ericaine," Econo- metrica, 24, 503 -- 546. Anscombe, F. J. and R. J. Aumann (1963): "A Definition of Subjective Probability," Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 199 -- 205. Azrieli, Y., C. P. Chambers, and P. J. Healy (2014): "Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming. Bergstrom, T. C. (1975): "Maximal Elements of Acyclic Relations on Com- pact Sets," Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 403 -- 404. Bergstrom, T. C., R. P. Parks, and T. Rader (1976): "Preferences which Have Open Graphs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 3, 265 -- 268. Border, K. C. and U. Segal (1994): "Dynamic Consistency Implies Ap- proximately Expected Utility Preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, 63, 170 -- 188. 32 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Chambers, C. P. and F. Echenique (2016): Revealed Preference Theory, Cambridge University Press. Chambers, C. P., F. Echenique, and E. Shmaya (2014): "The Ax- iomatic Structure of Empirical Content," American Economic Review, 104, 2303 -- 19. Debreu, G. (1954): "Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function," in Decision Processes, ed. by R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis, Wiley, 159 -- 165. Dugundji, J. (1966): Topology, Bacon. Fishburn, P. C. and A. Rubinstein (1982): "Time Preference," Interna- tional Economic Review, 23, 677 -- 694. Gorno, L. (2017): "Revealed preference and identification," Mimeo Getulio Vargas Foundation. Grodal, B. (1974): "A Note on the Space of Preference Relations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 279 -- 294. Hildenbrand, W. (1970): "On Economies with Many Agents," Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 161 -- 188. -- -- -- (2015): Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy, Princeton university press. Hylland, A. and R. Zeckhauser (1979): "The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions," Journal of Political economy, 87, 293 -- 314. Kannai, Y. (1970): "Continuity Properties of the Core of a Market," Econo- metrica, 38, 791 -- 815. Kertz, R. P. and U. Rosler (2000): "Complete Lattices of Proba- bility Measures with Applications to Martingale Theory," Lecture Notes- Monograph Series, 35, 153 -- 177. Kubler, F. and H. Polemarchakis (2017): "The Identification of Beliefs from Asset Demand," Econometrica, 85, 1219 -- 1238. Mas-Colell, A. (1974): "Continuous and Smooth Consumers: Approxima- tion Theorems," Journal of Economic Theory, 8, 305 -- 336. -- -- -- (1977): "The Recoverability of Consumers' Preferences from Market Demand Behavior," Econometrica, 45, 1409 -- 30. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 33 -- -- -- (1978): "On Revealed Preference Analysis," Review of Economic Stud- ies, 45, 121 -- 131. Nishimura, H., E. A. Ok, and J. K.-H. Quah (2017): "A Comprehensive Approach to Revealed Preference Theory," American Economic Review, 107, 1239 -- 1263. Pathak, P. A. and J. Sethuraman (2011): "Lotteries in student assign- ment: An equivalence result," Theoretical Economics, 6, 1 -- 17. Polemarchakis, H., L. Selden, and X. Song (2017): "The Identification of Attitudes Towards Ambiguity and Risk from Asset Demand," Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 17-43. Rader, T. (1972): Theory of Microeconomics, Academic Press. Reny, P. J. (2015): "A Characterization of Rationalizable Consumer Behav- ior," Econometrica, 83, 175 -- 192. Richter, M. K. (1966): "Revealed Preference Theory," Econometrica, 34, 635 -- 645. 34 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Appendix A. About Closed Convergence We recall below the formal definition of closed convergence, used throughout the results of this paper. Let F = {F n}n be a sequence of closed sets in X ×X. We define Li(F ) and Ls(F ) to be closed subsets of X × X as follows: • (x, y) ∈ Li(F ) if and only if, for all neighborhood V of (x, y), there exists N ∈ N such that F n ∩ V 6= ∅ for all n ≥ N. • (x, y) ∈ Ls(F ) if and only if, for all neighborhood V of (x, y), and all N ∈ N, there is n ≥ N such that F n ∩ V 6= ∅. Observe that Li(F ) ⊆ Ls(F ). The definition of closed convergence is as follows. Definition 23. F n converges to F in the topology of closed convergence if Li(F ) = F = Ls(F ). Appendix B. Proof of Proposition 1 Denote by (a′, b′) the open interval {z ∈ Rn : a′ ≪ z ≪ b′}. For each k, let uk : ∪k l=1Bl → [0, 1] be a utility representation of (cid:23)∗ on ∪k l=1Bl. For each k, let {[ai, bi]}nk i=1 be a sequence of intervals in Rn with the prop- erties that a) [a, b] ⊆ ∪nk i=1[ai, bi], b) (ai, bi) ∩ (aj, bj) = ∅ for i 6= j, c) each element of ∪k l=1Bl are contained in the same, and d) [ai, bi] is contained in some ball of radius (2k)−1.14 l=1Bl is contained in a set (ai, bi), and no two elements of ∪k For each interval [ai, bi] there is a continuous function fi such that f (x) = 0 for all x ∈ [ai, bi] \ (ai, bi), f (x) = uk(x) if x ∈ (ai, bi) ∩ ∪k l=1Bl, sup{f (x) : x ∈ [ai, bi]} = 2 and inf{f (x) : x ∈ [ai, bi]} = −2. Let u∗ k : [a, b] → R be the function that coincides with fi on each [ai, bi]. Let (cid:23)k be the preference relation represented by u∗ k, and note that (cid:23)k strongly rationalizes the choice function of order k generated by (cid:23)∗, and is continuous. Let x, y ∈ X. For each k, suppose that x ∈ [ai, bi] for the kth sequence of subintervals. Let xk ∈ [ai, bi] be such that u∗ k(xk) = 2. Note that kx − xkk < 1/k. Similarly, suppose that y ∈ [aj, bj] for the kth sequence of subintervals 14It is obvious that such a sequence exists. First, it is immediate that it exists for n = 1. For n > 1 project each Bk onto each of its coordinate and carry out the one-dimensional construction (choosing a sufficiently small radius for the balls covering each interval). Then take the cartesian product of each one-dimensional interval. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 35 and let yk ∈ [aj, bj] be such that u∗ (x, y) and x, y ∈ X were arbitrary this means that (cid:23)k→ X × X. k(yk) = −2. Then xk ≻k yk. Since (xk, yk) → Appendix C. Proof of Proposition 12 The proof is implied by the following lemmas. Lemma 24. Let X ⊆ Rn. If {x′ is a decreasing sequence, such that sup{x′ Then n} is an increasing sequence in X, and {x′′ n} n : n ≥ 1}. n : n ≥ 1} = x∗ = inf{x′′ lim n→∞ x′ n = x∗ = lim n→∞ x′′ n. Proof. This is obvously true for n = 1. For n > 1, convergence and sups and infs are obtained component-by-component, so the result follows. (cid:3) Lemma 25. Let X ⊆ Rn. Let {xn} be a convergent sequence in X, with xn → x∗. Then there is an increasing sequence {x′ n} and an a decreasing sequence {x′′ n, and limn→∞ x′ n = x∗ = limn→∞ x′′ n. n} such that x′ n ≤ xn ≤ x′′ Proof. Suppose that xn → x∗. Define x′ n and x′′ n by x′ n = inf{xm : n ≤ m} and x′′ n = sup{xm : n ≤ m} Then it is clear that x′ decreasing. Moreover, n ≤ xn ≤ x′′ n, that x′ n is increasing, and that x′′ n is lim n→∞ x′ n = sup{inf{xm : n ≤ m} : n ≥ 1} = x∗ = inf{sup{xm : n ≤ m} : n ≥ 1} = lim n→∞ x′′ n by Lemma 24. (cid:3) Lemma 26. Let X = ∆([a, b]). Let {xn} be a convergent sequence in X, with xn → x∗. Then there is an increasing sequence {x′ n} and an a decreasing n = x∗ = limn→∞ x′′ sequence {x′′ n, and limn→∞ x′ n. n} such that x′ n ≤ xn ≤ x′′ Proof. The set X ordered by first order stochastic dominance is a complete lattice (see, for example, Lemma 3.1 in Kertz and Rosler (2000)). Suppose that xn → x∗. Define x′ n = sup{xm : n = inf{xm : n ≤ m} and x′′ n and x′′ n by x′ 36 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT n ≤ m}. Clearly, {x′ x′ n ≤ xn ≤ x′′ n. Let Fx denote the cdf associated with x. Note that Fx′′ n} is an increasing sequence, {x′′ n(r) = inf{Fxm(r) : n(r) is the right-continuous modification of sup{Fxm(r) : n ≤ n ≤ m} while Fx′ m}. For any point of continuity r of F , Fxm(r) → Fx∗(r), so n} is decreasing, and Fx(r) = sup{inf{Fxm(r) : n ≤ m} : n ≥ 1} by Lemma 24. Moreover, Fx∗(r) = inf{sup{Fxm(r) : n ≤ m} : n ≥ 1}. Let ε > 0. Then Fx∗(r−ε) ← sup{Fxm(r−ε) : n ≤ m} ≤ Fx′ n(r) ≤ sup{Fxm(r+ε) : n ≤ m} → Fx∗(r+ε) Then Fx′ n(r) → Fx∗(r), as r is a point of continuity of Fx∗. (cid:3) The following lemma is immediate. Lemma 27. Let X = Rn Then the countable order property is satisfied. + with the standard vector order ≤, and let B = Qn +. Our last lemma is a direct implication of Theorem 15.11 of Aliprantis and Border (2006). Lemma 28. Let a, b ∈ R, where a < b. Let X = ∆([a, b]), the set of Borel probability distributions on [a, b] endowed with the weak* topology. Let B be the set of probability distributions p with finite support on Q ∩ [a, b], where for all q ∈ Q ∩ [a, b], p(q) ∈ Q. Then the countable order property is satisfied. Appendix D. Proof of Theorems 9, 21, 22 and 10 strictly monotonic binary relations. Members of R denote the set of complete, continuous, and need not be transitive. mon is the set of complete, continuous, and locally strict binary In this section, we let R mon ls Likewise, R relations. We record the following fact: Lemma 29. Let (cid:23) be a continuous binary relation. If x ≻ y then there are neighborhoods Vx of x and Vy of y such that x′ ≻ y′ for all x′ ∈ Vx and y′ ∈ Vy. We now prove Theorems 21 and 22. PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION Proof of Theorem 21. Follows directly from Lemma 32, below. 37 (cid:3) Proof of Theorem 22. First, it is straightforward to show that x ≻ y implies x (cid:23)′ y. Because otherwise there are x, y for which x ≻ y and y ≻′ x. Take an open neighborhood U about (x, y) and a pair (z, w) ∈ U ∩ (B × B) for which z ≻ w and w ≻′ z, a contradiction. Symmetrically, we also have x ≻′ y implies x (cid:23) y. Now, without loss, suppose that there is a pair x, y for which x ≻ y and x ∼′ y. By connectedness and continuity, V = {z : x ≻ z ≻ y} is nonempty and by continuity it is open.15 We claim that there is a pair (w, z) ∈ (V ×V )∩(B ×B) for which w ≻ z. By denseness of B, there is w ∈ V ∩ B for which x ≻ w ≻ y. Similarly, {z : w ≻ z ≻ y} is nonempty and open; so there is z ∈ B for which x ≻ w ≻ z ≻ y. We have shown that there is (w, z) ∈ (V × V ) ∩ (B × B) for which w ≻ z, so that x ≻ w ≻ z ≻ y. Further, we have hypothesized that x ∼′ y. By the first paragraph, we know that x (cid:23)′ w (cid:23)′ z (cid:23)′ y. If, by means of contradiction, we have w ≻′ z, then x ≻′ y, a contradiction. So w ∼′ z and w ≻ z, a contradiction to (cid:23)B×B=(cid:23)′ (cid:3) B×B. Lemma 30. Let A ⊆ X × X. Then {(cid:23): A ⊆(cid:23)} is closed in the closed convergence topology. Proof. Let (cid:23)n be a convergent sequence in the set in question, where (cid:23)n→(cid:23). Then for all (x, y) ∈ A, we have x (cid:23)n y, hence x (cid:23) y. So (x, y) ∈(cid:23). (cid:3) Lemma 31. Suppose X is locally compact Polish, and that < has open inter- vals. Then R is closed in the topology of closed convergence. mon Proof. By Lemma 8, since X is locally compact Polish, the topology of closed convergence is compact metrizable. Suppose (cid:23)n→(cid:23) where each (cid:23)n is continuous, strictly monotonic, and com- plete. We know that (cid:23) is continuous by compactness. Suppose by means of 15The argument for nonemptiness is as follows. If, by means of contradiction, V = ∅, then {z : x ≻ z} and {z : z ≻ y} are nonempty open sets. Further, for any z ∈ X, either x ≻ z or z ≻ y (because if ¬(x ≻ z) then by completeness z (cid:23) x, which implies that z ≻ y). Conclude that {z : x ≻ z} ∪ {z : z ≻ y} = X and each of the sets are nonempty and open (by continuity); these sets are disjoint, violating connectedness of X. 38 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT contradiction that (cid:23) is not strictly monotonic, so that there are x, y ∈ X for which x > y and y (cid:23) x. Then there are (xn, yn) → (x, y) for which yn (cid:23)n xn. For n large, xn > yn, a contradiction to the fact that (cid:23)n is strictly monotonic. Finally, completeness follows as for each x, y, either x (cid:23)n y or y (cid:23)n x, so there is a subsequence nk for which either x (cid:23)nk y or for which y (cid:23)nk x. (cid:3) Lemma 32. Suppose that B is dense, (cid:23)′ is complete, and each of (cid:23) and (cid:23)∗ are continuous and locally strict complete relations. Then if (cid:23)′ B×B ⊆(cid:23)∗ B×B∩ (cid:23) B×B, it follows that (cid:23)∗=(cid:23). Proof. Suppose, by means of contradiction and without loss of generality, that there are x, y ∈ X for which x (cid:23)∗ y and y ≻ x. By continuity of (cid:23) and local strictness of (cid:23)∗, we can without loss of generality assume that x ≻∗ y and y ≻ x. By continuity of each of (cid:23) and (cid:23)∗, there exists a, b ∈ B such that a ≻∗ b and b ≻ a. But by completeness of (cid:23)′, either a (cid:23)′ b, contradicting (cid:23)′ B×B ⊆(cid:23) B×B, or b (cid:23)′ a, contradicting (cid:23)′ B×B ⊆(cid:23)∗ B×B. (cid:3) We now turn to the main proof of the theorem. mon is compact. Let (cid:23)′ be any strictly Proof of Theorem 9. By Lemma 31, R monotonic and complete binary relation such that for all k and all {x, y} ∈ Σk, x ∈ ck({x, y}) if and only if x (cid:23)′ y ((cid:23)′ exists by the projection requirement on choice sequences, and by the fact that c ⊑ c(cid:23)∗). For each k, let (cid:23)′ For each k, let k= {(x, y) : {x, y} ∈ {B1, . . . , Bk} and x (cid:23)′ y}. Pk = {(cid:23)∈ R mon :(cid:23)′ k⊆(cid:23)}, the set of relations which weakly rationalize c. Observe by definition that by Lemma 30, Pk is closed, and hence compact. By assumption, each (cid:23)∈ Pk , and obviously, for all k, (cid:23)∗∈ Pk. Further, observe that B×B⊆(cid:23)∗ B×B∩ (cid:23) B×B and satisfies (cid:23)∈ R Tk Pk = {(cid:23)∗}, since if (cid:23)∈ Tk Pk, by definition (cid:23)′ Lemma 32. ls The result now follows as each Pi is compact and Tk Pk = {(cid:23)∗}. That is, let (cid:23)k∈ Pk, which is a decreasing, nested collection of compact sets. Suppose by PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 39 means of contradiction and without loss that (cid:23)k→(cid:23)′6=(cid:23)∗, and observe then that it follows that (cid:23)′∈ Pk for all k, contradicting Ti Pi = {(cid:23)∗}. (cid:3) Proof of Theorem 10. Observe that for any k, the set Pk = {(cid:23)∈ R mon :(cid:23) weakly rationalizes ck} is closed, and hence compact by Lemma 30. Observe that P k(c) ⊆ Pk. More- over, it is obvious that Pk+1 ⊆ Pk. Suppose that there is no k for which P k(c) = ∅. Then, since each Pk 6= ∅ and each Pk is compact, Tk Pk 6= ∅. Let (cid:23)∗∈ Tk Pk. We claim that Tk Pk = {(cid:23)∗}. Suppose by means of contradiction that there is (cid:23)6=(cid:23)∗ where (cid:23)∈ Tk Pk. Let (cid:23)′ be any complete relation such that for all (a, b) ∈ B × B, a (cid:23)′ b if and only if a ∈ ck({a, b}), for k such that {a, b} ∈ Σk. Then, by definition of weak rationalization, we have (cid:23)′ B×B. Appeal to Lemma 32 to conclude that (cid:23)=(cid:23)∗, a contradiction. B×B⊆(cid:23)B×B ∩ (cid:23)∗ Finally, since Tk Pk = {(cid:23)∗}, and each Pk is compact, it follows that limk→∞ diam(Pk) → 0.16 Hence, since 0 ≤ diam(P k(c)) ≤ diam(Pk), the result follows. (cid:3) Appendix E. Proof of Theorem 11 The set of weakly monotone and continuous binary relations is compact in the topology of closed convergence. Suppose wlog that (cid:23)k→(cid:23). Then (cid:23) is a continuous binary relation. We shall prove that (cid:23)=(cid:23)∗. First we show that x ≻∗ y implies that x ≻ y. So let x ≻∗ y. Let U and V be neighborhoods of x and y, respectively, such that x′ ≻∗ y′ for all x′ ∈ U and y′ ∈ V . Such neighborhoods exist by the continuity of (cid:23)∗. We prove first that if (x′, y′) ∈ U × V , then there exists N such that x′ ≻n y′ for all n ≥ N. By hypothesis, there exist x′′ ∈ U ∩ B and y′′ ∈ V ∩ B such that x′′ ≤ x′ and y′ ≤ y′′. Each (cid:23)n is a strong rationalization of the finite experiment of order n, so if {x, y} ∈ Σn then x ≻n y implies that x ≻m y for all m ≥ n. Since x′′, y′′ ∈ B, there is N is such that {x′′, y′′} ∈ ΣN . Thus x′′ ≻∗ y′′ implies that x′′ ≻n y′′ for all n ≥ N. So, for n ≥ N, x′ ≻n y′, as (cid:23)n is weakly monotone. 16Otherwise, we could choose ǫ > 0 and two subsequences (cid:23)kl, (cid:23)′ ) ≥ ǫ and (cid:23)kl→(cid:23)∈ Tk Pk and (cid:23)′ kl→(cid:23)′∈ Tk Pk where δC ((cid:23), (cid:23)′) ≥ ǫ, a contradiction. kl such that δC ((cid:23)kl, (cid:23)′ kl 40 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT Now we establish that x ≻ y. Let {(xn, yn)} be an arbitrary sequence with n}, and n while (x, y) = (xn, yn) → (x, y). By hypothesis, there is an increasing sequence {x′ a decreasing sequence {y′ limn→∞(x′ n ≤ xn and yn ≤ y′ n}, such that x′ n, y′ n). Let N be large enough that x′ N ∈ V . Let N ′ ≥ N be such N for all n ≥ N ′ (we established the existence of such N ′ above). N ∈ U and y′ N ≻n y′ that x′ Then, for any n ≥ N ′ we have that xn ≥ x′ n ≥ yn. n ≥ x′ N ≻n y′ N ≥ y′ By the weak monotonicity of (cid:23)n, then, xn ≻n yn. The sequence {(xn, yn)} was arbitrary, so (y, x) /∈(cid:23)= limn→∞ (cid:23)n. Thus ¬(y (cid:23) x). Completeness of (cid:23) implies that x ≻ y. In second place we show that if x (cid:23)∗ y then x (cid:23) y, thus completing the proof. So let x (cid:23)∗ y. We recursively construct sequences xnk , ynk such that xnk (cid:23)nk ynk and xnk → x, ynk → y. So, for any k ≥ 1, choose x′ ∈ Nx(1/k)∩B with x′ ≥ x, and y′ ∈ Ny(1/k)∩B with y′ ≤ y; so that x′ (cid:23)∗ x (cid:23)∗ y (cid:23)∗ y′, as (cid:23)∗ is weakly monotone. Recall that (cid:23)n strongly rationalizes c(cid:23)∗ for Σn. So x′ (cid:23)∗ y′ and x′, y′ ∈ B imply that x′ (cid:23)n y′ for all n large enough. Let nk > nk−1 (where we can take n0 = 0) such that x′ (cid:23)nk y′; and let xnk = x′ and ynk = y′. Then we have (xnk, ynk) → (x, y) and xnk (cid:23)nk ynk. Thus x (cid:23) y. Appendix F. Proof of Theorem 15 and Proposition 5 We begin with two useful lemmas. Lemma 33. Φ is an open map if for any u∗ ∈ U and any sequence (cid:23)n in R with (cid:23)n→ Φ(u∗), there is a sequence {un} in U such that un ∈ Φ−1((cid:23)n) and un → u∗ in the topology of compact convergence. Proof. Suppose that there is V ⊆ U open, but Φ(V ) is not open. Then there is u∗ ∈ V and (cid:23)n /∈ Φ(V ) such that (cid:23)n→ Φ(u∗) (since closed convergence topology is metrizable). Since u∗ ∈ V , any sequence un ∈ Φ−1((cid:23)n) for which un → u∗ eventually has un ∈ V . But if un is chosen to represent (cid:23)n, this implies that Φ(un) ∈ Φ(V ) for n large, a contradiction. (cid:3) PREFERENCE IDENTIFICATION 41 Lemma 34. For any (cid:23) and x ∈ X, there is a unique m∗(x) ∈ M with x ∼ m∗(x). Moreover, if we fix u ∈ U then the function u(cid:23) : X → R defined by u(cid:23)(x) = u(m∗(x)) is a continuous utility representation of (cid:23). Proof. Consider the sets A = {m ∈ M : m (cid:23) x} and B = {m ∈ M : x (cid:23) m}. These sets are closed because (cid:23) is continuous, their union is M as (cid:23) is complete, and they are nonempty as (cid:23) is monotone and there exist m, m ∈ M with m ≤ x ≤ m by our hypothesis on M. M is connected, so A and B cannot be disjoint; hence there is m ∈ M with x ∼ m. This m must be unique because M is totally ordered, and (cid:23) is strictly monotone. We now show that u(cid:23) is a continuous utility representation of (cid:23). Let x (cid:23) y. Then transitivity and monotonicity of (cid:23) imply that m∗(x) ≥ m∗(y). Thus u(cid:23)(x) = u∗(m∗(x)) ≥ u∗(m∗(y)) = u(cid:23)(y). The converse implications hold as well; thus u(cid:23) represents (cid:23). To prove continuity, let xn → x∗. We shall prove that mn = m∗(xn) → m∗(x∗) = m. Suppose first that m is not the largest or the least element of M. For each neighborhood U of m there exists, by our hypothesis on M, m, m ∈ M with m < m < m and [m, m] ⊆ U. Then V = {z ∈ X : m ≻ z} ∩ {z ∈ X : z ≻ m} is a neighborhood of x∗, as x∗ ∼ m and (cid:23) is continuous and monotone. For large enough n then xn ∈ V , so mn ∈ [m, m] ⊆ U. Suppose now that m is the largest element of M. Then, reasoning as above, xn ∈ {z ∈ X : z ≻ m} for all large enough n, so that m ≤ mn. We have mn ≤ m as m is the largest element of M. Thus mn ∈ [m, m] ⊆ U. The argument when m is the least element of M is analogous. (cid:3) We now turn to the main proof of the theorem, which proves Proposition 5. Proof of Theorem 15. Let u∗ ∈ U and {(cid:23)n} be a sequence in R with (cid:23)n→ Φ(u∗). By Lemma 33 it is enough to exhibit a sequence un ∈ Φ−1((cid:23)n) and un → u∗ in the topology of compact convergence. Let un = u(cid:23)n as defined in Lemma 34 from u∗. Lemma 34 implies that un ∈ Φ−1((cid:23)n). By XII Theorem 7.5 p. 268 of Dugundji (1966), to establish 42 CHAMBERS, ECHENIQUE, AND LAMBERT compact convergence it is enough to show that for any convergent sequence {xn}, with xn → x∗, un(xn) → u∗(x∗). To this end, let xn → x∗. Let m = m∗(x∗) and mn ∼n xn, using the notation in Lemma 34, and U be a neighborhood of m. Let m, m ∈ M be such that m < m < m and [m, m] ⊆ U. Then it must be true that mn ∈ [m, m] for all n large enough. To see this, note that if, for example, mn ≥ m infinitely often then there would exist a subsequence for which xn (cid:23)n mn (cid:23) m (by monotonicity of (cid:23)), which would imply that x∗ (cid:23) m > m, as (cid:23)n→(cid:23). But m ∼ x∗ (cid:23) m is a violation of monotonicity. Now mn ∈ [m, m] ⊆ U for all n large enough means that mn → m. Thus u(cid:23)n(xn) = u∗(xn) → u∗(x∗) = u(cid:23)(x∗), as u∗ is continuous. (cid:3) Appendix G. Proof of Theorem 18 By Theorem 8 of Border and Segal (1994), Φ(V) is compact, and therefore (cid:23)k possesses a limit point (cid:23)∗∈ Φ(V). By Lemma 30, the set of (cid:23)k weakly rationalizing ck is closed, and hence compact. Suppose by means of contra- k also weakly rationalizing ck which converges to diction that there is some (cid:23)′ (cid:23)6=(cid:23)∗. Observe that each of (cid:23)∗ and (cid:23) weakly rationalize each ck. Finally, let (cid:23)′ be any complete relation such that for all (a, b) ∈ B × B, a (cid:23)′ b if and only if a ∈ ck({a, b}), for k such that {a, b} ∈ Σk. Then, by definition of weak rationalization, we have (cid:23)′ B×B. Appeal then to Lemma 32 to conclude that (cid:23)=(cid:23)∗, a contradiction. B×B⊆(cid:23)B×B ∩ (cid:23)∗
1808.04020	1	1808	2018-08-12T23:28:31	Mechanism Design with News Utility	[ "econ.TH" ]	News utility is the idea that the utility of an agent depends on changes in her beliefs over consumption and money. We introduce news utility into otherwise classical static Bayesian mechanism design models. We show that a key role is played by the timeline of the mechanism, i.e. whether there are delays between the announcement stage, the participation stage, the play stage and the realization stage of a mechanism. Depending on the timing, agents with news utility can experience two additional news utility effects: a surprise effect derived from comparing to pre-mechanism beliefs, as well as a realization effect derived from comparing post-play beliefs with the actual outcome of the mechanism. We look at two distinct mechanism design settings reflecting the two main strands of the classical literature. In the first model, a monopolist screens an agent according to the magnitude of her loss aversion. In the second model, we consider a general multi-agent Bayesian mechanism design setting where the uncertainty of each player stems from not knowing the intrinsic types of the other agents. We give applications to auctions and public good provision which illustrate how news utility changes classical results. For both models we characterize the optimal design of the timeline. A timeline featuring no delay between participation and play but a delay in realization is never optimal in either model. In the screening model the optimal timeline is one without delays. In auction settings, under fairly natural assumptions the optimal timeline has delays between all three stages of the mechanism.	econ.TH	econ	Mechanism Design with News Utility∗ Jetlir Duraj† Abstract News utility is the idea that the utility of an agent also depends on changes in her beliefs over consumption and money. We introduce news utility into otherwise classical static Bayesian mechanism design models. We show that a key role is played by the timeline of the mechanism, i.e. whether there are delays between the announcement stage, the participation stage, the play stage and the realization stage of a mechanism. Depending on the timing, agents with news utility can experience two additional news utility effects: a surprise effect derived from comparing to pre- mechanism beliefs, as well as a realization effect derived from comparing post-play beliefs with the actual outcome of the mechanism. We look at two distinct mechanism design settings reflecting the two main strands of the classical literature. In the first model, a monopolist screens an agent according to the magnitude of her loss aversion. In the second model, we consider a general multi-agent Bayesian mechanism design setting where the uncertainty of each player stems from not knowing the intrinsic types of the other agents. We give applications to auctions and public good provision which illustrate how news utility changes classical results. For both models we characterize the optimal design of the timeline. A timeline featuring no delay between participation and play but a delay in realization is never optimal in either model. In the screening model the optimal timeline is one without delays. In auction settings, under fairly natural assumptions the optimal timeline may have delays between all three stages of the mechanism. 1 Introduction Most situations in practice to which the theory of classical static Bayesian mechanism design is applicable can be thought of as consisting of three distinct stages: first, the mechanism is announced to the agents and the agents decide whether to participate; second, the agents decide what to play in the mechanism and finally, the mechanism outcome consisting of a consumption allocation and money transfers to the designer is realized. Classical models of Bayesian mechanism design generally assume that the agents pos- sess quasi-linear utility and are Expected Utility maximizers. Absent discounting issues the analysis is the same in the classical model for the cases where the above mentioned ∗I am thankful to Drew Fudenberg, Matthew Rabin and Tomasz Strzalecki for continuous support in this project as well as to Fabian Herweg for introducing me to this topic. I thank Daniel Clark and Kevin He for numerous comments as well as Arjada Bardhi, Krishna Dasaratha, Jerry Green, Annie Liang and Eric Maskin for comments during different stages of this project. Any errors are mine. †[email protected] 1 stages may happen with delay from each other.1 This is because the agents in the classical model are time-consistent as well as insensitive to the timing of the realization of uncer- tainty. This paper characterizes mechanism design for agents who violate the last two assumptions in a specific way: they experience news utility and loss aversion. These two features make the agents sensitive to whether uncertainty is resolved with delay and lead to time-inconsistent behavior. We look at the case of news-utility agents who are sophis- ticated with regard to this time-inconsistency. These assumptions lead to considerable differences to classical analysis: besides changes in several key intuitions from classical settings, the issue of the optimal design of the timeline of the mechanism becomes salient. More precisely, in this paper we assume agents possess quasi-linear intrinsic utility and add the innovation that their utilities depend on changes in their beliefs over consumption and money (henceforth called news utility). News utility is assumed separable in the good and money dimension and the comparison of new to old beliefs uses a classical gain-loss function featuring loss aversion (see e.g. [Kahneman, Tversky '79]) -- relative to good news, utility losses from 'bad news' are compounded due to loss aversion. The agents in this paper are forward-looking with respect to both intrinsic and news utility as well as sophisticated about their future behavior. We assume news utility is produced only from objective sources, i.e. there is no self-production of news utility and that each agent takes into account future news utility in expectation in any decision instance. Just as for the classical part of the utility, the belief over future consumption and money used to weigh news utility is induced by an agent's play and other random factors in the environment. We consider the consequences of such preferences in two different Bayesian mechanism design settings reflecting two of the main strands of the classical literature: monopolistic screening of a single agent as well as multi-agent mechanism design such as auction or public goods settings. In the screening model we assume the uncertainty facing the mo- nopolist concerns a behavioral parameter of the agent: her loss aversion level in the good and money dimension. We also assume that the agent learns her intrinsic type only upon consumption. This simple model already matches many situations in the real world where the intrinsic value of a consumption good is discovered only upon consumption. In the multi-agent model we assume that all 'behavioral' features of the preferences are common knowledge, the agents know their intrinsic type when presented with the mechanism, and an agent's uncertainty only comes from not knowing the intrinsic type of the other agents. Therefore, the informational side of the multi-agent model is a straightforward extension of the classical multi-agent Bayesian mechanism design model with quasilinear utility, whose prime examples in the literature are auction settings or provision of public goods. In stark contrast to the classical setting, with the new preferences it matters whether there are delays between stages of a mechanism so that we distinguish three main timelines for the analysis.2 In timeline A, the mechanism is implemented without delay: the announcement of its existence, the decision to participate and what to play happen almost concurrently so that 1Besides strategic use of delays by a designer, exogenously given delays due to technological constraints between stages where uncertainty persists in the agents' minds are a recurrent feature of life: goods need to be produced, information must travel, etc. 2Additional timelines are equivalent to the ones presented here under two simplifying assumptions: no-discounting of utility and the the designer cannot randomize. See subsection 1.1 and Proposition 1 for more details. Figure 2 from subsection 2.1 and Figure 3 from subsection 3.1 respectively depict in detail the timelines for the two different mechanism design models. 2 each agent only experiences one bout of news utility (dubbed surprise effect) coming from comparing the pre-mechanism beliefs in the consumption and money dimensions pinned down by her outside option with the new (degenerate) beliefs induced by the realization of the mechanism outcome. In timeline B the participation and play stages of the mechanism happen without delay but the mechanism outcome is realized with delay. Besides the surprise effect the agent experiences now a second bout of news utility coming from comparing the actual realization of the mechanism outcome with the distribution induced by her play decision and the environment (dubbed realization effect). She takes this into account in expectation at the play stage. This results in lower interim utility because of loss aversion: delaying the outcome after a play decision hurts the agent because bad news hurt more in expectation than good news elate. Finally, in timeline C there is a delay between the participation stage and the play stage, besides the delay between the play stage and the moment the mechanism outcome is realized. In this case the agent's time inconsistency becomes observable as different selves with different objectives decide on participation and play. The play-self doesn't take into account the surprise effect of the participation self whereas the latter takes into account the future behavior of the play-self. This wedge between participation and play can be fruitfully used by the designer in certain situations as she may be able to exploit the play-self better once she is locked-in after deciding to take part in the mechanism. This comes at a cost though: in optimal mechanisms the participation-self, being sophisticated and anticipating her future decisions, may need to be subsidized in comparison to the other timelines. Say that a direct mechanism is incentive compatible if revealing own private informa- tion is an equilibrium for the respective timeline of the mechanism. Similar to the classical setting, monotonicity conditions are key in characterizing incentive compatibility and the resulting expected transfers. But due to news utility, monotonicity applies to modified interim perceived valuations instead of the interim intrinsic valuations from the classical setting. As a consequence, incentive compatible allocation rules only determine perceived expected transfers to the designer, up to type-independent constants. Say that an incentive compatible mechanism is individually rational if it gives an equilibrium participation utility higher than the outside option to every agent. Whereas the same self decides about incentive compatibility and individual rationality whenever there is no delay between participation and play decisions (timelines A and B), different selves decide on them when there is a delay between the two decision stages (timeline C). For allocation rules whose incentive compatibility is unproblematic in the classical model, loss aversion can lead to failure of incentive compatibility whenever it is high enough and the timeline features delays. We illustrate this in the case of the ex-post efficiency rule for public good provision with symmetric agents and private information concerning the intrinsic type.3 We also show how incentive compatibility may be restored in that setting under certain conditions on the distribution of the intrinsic valuation of the public good, whenever the number of agents is high enough. Intuitively, with a large number of agents the law of large numbers kicks in and the ex-post efficiency rule implies small news utility costs for delays as the probability of provision becomes either very high or very low. 3Ex-post efficiency means the designer would like to maximize the welfare of the agents under complete information. 3 For the screening model we show that a timeline without any delays (timeline A) is optimal whenever the private information of the agent, her loss aversion, is symmetric across the two dimensions, consumption and money. Furthermore, a timeline without delays between participation and play decision is always weakly better than one with delays between the two decision stages (timeline C). This ranking relies on the assumed symmetry for the loss aversion across dimensions, which implies a relatively small negative surprise effect in the money dimension at the moment of the participation decision, as well as on the fact that the subsidy for the individual rationality constraint in timeline C is non-negligible. For the multiple agent model where private information concerns intrinsic valuations we study the optimality of timelines in the case of auctions with symmetric agents. We show that, analogous to the screening model, timeline B is never optimal as it is dominated by a timeline A. We show by example that timeline C may be optimal whenever the lowest intrinsic type is strictly higher than the highest utility of the outside option of an agent. Intuitively, this is precisely the case when the agent has maximal participation incentives. This lowers the subsidy needed to overcome the incentive wedge between the participation- self and the reporting-self. When compared to A, timeline C has an improved incentive compatibility property due to two effects: 1) the missing negative surprise in the money dimension, and 2) the designer can condition payments on the uncertainty facing the agents after their declared type in such a way as to give better incentives for truthtelling. The second effect is costly for each agent due to loss aversion, but may result in higher revenue overall due to improved incentive compatibility. Overall, when the loss aversion in the money is high enough, so that the first effect is strong, timeline C may dominate a timeline A. In the same example and for the case that loss aversion in the money dimension is low enough we show that a timeline A may remain optimal. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next subsection we introduce the model for a single agent which is the building block for both of the mechanism design models we consider. Subsection 1.2 comments on related literature. Section 2 contains the one-agent screening model for loss aversion followed by Section 3 which considers the multi-agent model where agents face uncertainty about the intrinsic types of their opponents. Proofs for the main results of the paper are relegated in the appendix. The online appendix comments on the revelation principle in our setting and relaxes the as- sumption of a degenerate outside option in the money dimension. It also contains several other applications of the multi-agent model to other classical Bayesian mechanism design settings. 1.1 Preferences This subsection explains in detail the preferences and the decision procedure of the agents. Agents experience intrinsic utility from actual consumption and payments as well as news utility from changes in beliefs. Intrinsic utility. The agent derives intrinsic utility from consumption of a profile a of consumption goods coming from a set of physical allocations A which is a closed, connected subset of an Euclidean space Rd, d ≥ 1 as well as from a monetary transfer t. Moreover, the utility of the agent from the pair of consumption goods and monetary payment (a, t) depends also on a parameter which we call her intrinsic type θ and which 4 comes from a closed interval of R denoted Θ = [θ, ¯θ]. We assume that intrinsic utility for each agent with type θ is quasilinear and of the form V (a, θ, t) = v(a)θ − t. (1) v : A→R+ is assumed differentiable. Let in the following ∆(A× Θ× R) denote the set of Borel probability distributions over A × Θ × R. We assume the agent conforms to Expected Utility in the intrinsic part of her utility. That is, if the uncertainty over u = (a, θ, t) is captured by a distribution G ∈ ∆(A×Θ×R) then the agent experiences expected intrinsic utility of the form Hereafter, u ∼ G means the random variable u is distributed according to the distribution G. Eu∼G[V (u)]. News utility. Besides intrinsic utility, the agent experiences news utility whenever her beliefs about the realization of u objectively change from H to some G ∈ ∆(A × Θ × R). News utility is experienced in two dimensions: in the consumption dimension (upper index g in the following, g stands for good ), and in the monetary dimension (upper index m in the following). For any G ∈ ∆(A× Θ×R) denote by Gg the distribution of v(a)θ induced by G. This depends only on the marginal distribution of G on A × Θ. Moreover, let Gm be the marginal distribution of G on the monetary payments. Whenever the agent's belief changes from G to H she experiences news utility in the dimension j = g, m given by N j(GjH j) = µj ξj(cGj (p) − cH j (p))dp. Here for any real-valued distribution F , cF (p) is the p-percentile of F , p ∈ (0, 1).4 More- over, (cid:90) 1 (cid:40) 0 ξj(y) = (2) y λjy if y ≥ 0 if y < 0 is a value function of Kahneman-Tversky type ([Kahneman, Tversky '79]).5 Here λj > 1 is the loss aversion parameter of the agent in the dimension j. A negative change causes the agent to experience a disutility greater in magnitude than the elation caused by a positive change of the same size. µj > 0 is the agent's relative weight on the news utility in dimension j. Overall, news utility of the change from H to G is given through the sum of the news utilities of the two dimensions. N (GH) = N g(GgH g) + N m(GmH m). The timelines we have in mind are the following. First, the agent is offered a menu of lotteries C which is a subset of ∆(A× Θ×R). We assume this is a non-empty compact set 4For any p ∈ (0, 1) the p-percentile cF (p) of F is determined by the conditions F (cF (p)) ≥ p and F (c) < p for any c < cF (p). 5This percentile-per-percentile comparison first appeared in [Koszegi, Rabin '09]. See [Pagel '17] for alternative specifications of the news utility which can incorporate correlation between dimensions. 5 of ∆(A × Θ × R) where we have equipped the latter with topology of weak convergence of probability measures (this fits both mechanism design models below). Then she picks a lottery from C and finally the outcome of the lottery is realized. There may exist delays between the moment the menu C is offered to the agent and the moment she chooses from C as well as the moment the uncertainty from the lottery she picked from C is realized. These delays may be due to technological constraints or they may be introduced through the outside party, call it designer, which designs the menu C.6 7 We assume that there is no discounting of time whenever a delay is present.8 The timelines the agent may face depending on the timing of delays are depicted in Figure 1.9 Figure 1: Different timelines. In the following we also assume that the agent has an exogenously given belief over A × Θ × R given by F0. This is what she expects to happen if she is not notified of the option of choosing from C. In mechanism design settings below F0 is determined by the outside option of the agent. To calculate the overall utility of an agent we impose the following assumptions on the agent's behavior. Assumption 1: The agent is sophisticated, Bayesian and forward-looking. That is, she takes into account the optimal behavior of future selves, uses Bayes rule to update 6Some typical examples of technological constraints comprise settings where communication takes time or where delivery of payments/goods or production of a good whose consumption value is uncertain takes time. 7In the mechanism design settings we consider not every menu C out of ∆(A × Θ × R) is feasible. In particular, we don't allow the designer to randomize so that the subjective randomness the agents face is only due to the environment. 8It is not hard to introduce discounting to the model but discounting doesn't yield any additional deep insight besides making the model much more cumbersome. 9Additional timelines featuring delay between the announcement of the existence of C and the moment the agent is required to decide on whether to accept C or not are equivalent to existing ones under the no- discounting assumption by the same argument as we show for timelines C and D below (see Proposition 1). Those timelines would be relevant in a model of 'deciding when to decide' which is outside the scope of this paper. 6 ADCBAccept ordecline MChoice from M (if accept)Uncertainty isrealizeddelaydelaydelaydelayAccept ordecline MUncertainty isrealizedChoice from M (if accept)Choice from M (if accept)Choice from M (if accept)Accept ordecline MAccept ordecline MUncertainty isrealizedUncertainty isrealizedbeliefs whenever possible and is indifferent to the welfare of past selves. This means that when deciding whether to accept the menu C the agent takes into account the actual choice she will make from C. Moreover, at each decision moment after a delay no past intrinsic or news utility is taken into account. We note here that Assumption 1 doesn't necessarily imply a temporal coordination of selves in the sense that the self picking from C needs to break ties in favor of the self who decides to accept or reject C.10 Assumption 2: News utility is produced only from objective sources, that is, there is no self-production of news utility. In particular, the agent conforms with Expected Utility at each moment in time with respect to any subjective randomization device.11 Under this assumption it is unproblematic to assume that the agent doesn't possess a randomization device when picking from C. Assumption 3: At any moment in time, if no delay is present there is at most one new news utility term. It comes from comparing beliefs before an objective source of news with those after the objective source of news. Assumptions 2 and 3 imply that there are at most two instances of production of news utility in the above timelines: 1) when the menu C is presented to the agent if she decides to accept it (surprise effect), as well as 2) when the uncertainty of the lottery she picked from the menu is realized (realization effect). Assume the agent ultimately chooses F ∈ C. Then the surprise effect in timelines B,C,D corresponds to experiencing N (FF0). The realization effect for timelines B,C and D corresponds to experiencing N (uF ) whenever u ∈ A × Θ × R is the realization of F . In timeline A the two news utility effects coincide and there is only one news utility term comprised of N (uF0) whenever u ∈ A × Θ × R is realized. This is because timeline A stands for the case where the decisions of whether to accept C, what lottery to pick out of C and the realization of the resulting uncertainty all happen without delay and almost concurrently. Assumption 4: Each agent in a decision moment takes into account future news util- ity terms in expectation by weighting them with the belief induced by her actual decision be it a decision on or off -equilibrium path.12 This implies for an agent in timelines B, C, D who accepted the menu C, that the expec- tation of her news utility from the realization effect whenever she picks F ∈ C is given by Eu∼F [N (uF )]. We call such a term an expected news utility term. 10An idea of coordination among selves to give a past self a higher utility underlies the PPE concept in [Koszegi, Rabin '06]. 11The related PPE concept used in [Koszegi, Rabin '06] (see also [Koszegi, Rabin '09]) to model agents who experience expectation-based loss aversion allows for the possibility of self-production of news utility and therefore adds an additional constraint to the maximization problem of the agent. This may lead to existence and characterization problems (see [Koszegi '10]). These are excluded by our assumptions. 12Just as in the case of Assumption 2 this is in stark difference to the PPE solution concept in [Koszegi, Rabin '06] and [Koszegi, Rabin '09]. 7 Decision procedure of a single agent. In timeline A the expected news utility from accepting the menu C and choosing F ∈ C enters the overall decision utility of the agent as Eu∼F [N (uF0)]. For the case that the agent doesn't accept menu C she experiences utility O(F0) = Eu∼F0[V (u)] + Eu∼F0[N (uF0)], regardless of whether the realization of F0 happens with a delay or not.13 14 For the case that F0 is degenerate, say puts probability one on u0, we have O(F0) = V (u0). Whenever the agent accepts the menu, she experiences in timeline A the decision utility Eu∼F [V (u)] + Eu∼F [N (uF0)]. She accepts C if and only if this utility is higher than O(F0). max F∈C In timeline B she accepts C if and only if her decision utility from C given by Eu∼F [V (u)] + Eu∼F [N (uF0)] + Eu∼F [N (uF )] max F∈C (3) is higher than O(F0). She then picks an F from C where the maximum is attained. In timelines C and D different selves of the agent with distinct perspectives decide on whether C should be accepted and then on the lottery picked out of C. For the case that the agent has accepted C her decision utility from choosing out of C is Eu∼F [V (u)] + Eu∼F [N (uF )]. max F∈C Being sophisticated, she then accepts C if and only if her decision utility Eu∼F [V (u)] + Eu∼F [N (uF0)] + Eu∼F [N (uF )], evaluated at the F she expects to choose out of C, is higher than O(F0). If there are multiple F ∈ C which are optimal we assume she breaks ties deterministically and that her self at the moment of deciding whether to accept C anticipates the tie-breaking correctly. This is in line with Assumption 1 above. Formally, we assume the following condition about possible tie-breaking. Deterministic tie-breaking. Whenever the agent is indifferent between accepting C and rejecting, she accepts it. Whenever the agent is indifferent between distinct elements of C at the choice-out-of-menu stage she breaks ties deterministically.15 16 Our Assumptions together with deterministic tie-breaking ensure a full characterization of behavior. It is easy to see that the behavior in timeline D is the same as in timeline C. The following Proposition registers this property as well as another simple one which has important consequences in mechanism design settings. 13O stands for outside option. 14She experiences only one news utility term given by N (uF0) whenever u is realized and takes ex- pectation of it by weighting with F0. This is because F0 is not a surprise, i.e. it is expected by the agent at the beginning of time. 15Deterministic tie-breaking is in line with Assumption 2 above. We assume it here so that we can focus on the behavioral features of the model rather than technicalities. 16All settings considered in this paper correspond to menus whose elements are parametrized through a compact one-dimensional interval so that it is easy to write down deterministic tie-breaking rules. 8 Proposition 1. 1) Expected news utility terms of the form Eu∼F [N (uF )] are non-positive and vanish if and only if F puts unit mass on a single element u0. 2) The behavior of the agent is the same in timelines C and D. The proof of the equivalence of C and D is contained in the text above. It relies crucially on the no-discounting assumption as well as on Assumption 2.17 Part 1) is an implication of loss aversion. Because of loss aversion percentile comparisons between the realized u and the percentiles of the 'reference' distribution F are weighted asymmetrically depending on whether they correspond to a loss or gain; losses in the dimension j get a weight of µjλj whereas gains only of µj in units of intrinsic utility. Averaging out across realizations of u results in a negative expected news utility effect. Due to Proposition 1 we identify timelines C and D in the rest of the paper. 1.2 Related Literature This paper connects to different strands of the mechanism design literature as well as of the applied behavioral literature. The focus on optimal timeline choice for preferences which are sensitive to the timing of announcements and additionally feature loss aversion seems new in the literature. [Ely et al. '15] analyzes the optimal way to disclose information to an agent whose preferences depend on the path of the belief change. In their model the agent has pref- erence for late resolution of uncertainty as she likes to experience suspense and surprise. In our model the agent exhibits preference for early resolution of uncertainty due to loss aversion. Moreover, the goal of the designer in [Ely et al. '15] is to maximize welfare of the agent whereas we focus on profit maximization. Finally, their model features a fixed timeline whereas we also study the optimal choice of the timeline in our model. There are by now several screening models where sophisticated agents exhibit loss- aversion. [Carbajal, Ely '14] proposes a screening model of reference dependent and loss averse consumers where the reference point is non-stochastic and depends linearly on the private information of the consumer. [Hahn et al. '18] consider price discrimination with loss-averse consumers. Similar to the model proposed in Section 2 they assume the buyers don't know their intrinsic valuation at the moment they face the menu of bundles the monopolist offers. They assume that the reference point is the menu of bundles the monopolist offers and work with ex-post participation and incentive compatibility constraints. Loss aversion parameters are known by the monopolist in their model. Our model assumes the monopolist has imperfect information about loss aversion parameters. Moreover, our model introduces and studies the issue of designing the optimal screening timeline which is missing from both papers mentioned. The applied behavioral literature offers several models where a designer, say a mo- nopolist or a firm in a competitive market, screens on behavioral features of the agents. [Eliaz, Spiegler '06] and [Eliaz, Spiegler '08] consider a designer who faces agents who may hold potentially incorrect beliefs about their future utility and screens respectively on the level of sophistication or on the level of optimism of the agent. [Heidhues, Koszegi '17] offer a related model and study welfare consequences of screening for the sophistication 17In the mechanism design settings below there is no uniform result as to which of timelines C,D is better once discounting is allowed. Intuitively, discounting applies in timeline C to both intrinsic utility and news utility at the choice-from-menu stage whereas it applies to neither in timeline D. 9 level of agents. [Heidhues, Koszegi '10] and [Englmaier et al '17] offer models in various settings where a designer screens agents according to their present-bias level. In all of these models one of the main reasons the agents are dynamically inconsistent is that they may be naive about their future behavior whereas in our paper the agent is sophisticated and dynamic inconsistency arises directly from an agent's preferences and not through incorrect beliefs about future behavior. [Heidhues, Koszegi '14] considers a monopolistic setting where there is complete in- formation about agent's preferences, but the monopolist can commit to draw the price from an ex-ante designed and announced distribution: in period 1 the agent observes the price distribution and forms expectations, while in period 2 it observes the drawn price and decides whether to buy or not. The optimal price distribution is non-degenerate. In contrast, in this paper the designer is assumed to reveal all details of the mechanism in a single step at the beginning of the game and we work with interim (as opposed to ex-post) participation constraints.18 Nevertheless, since in our multi-agent model uncertainty per- sists even with deterministic mechanisms, we get a related result to theirs in our setting: it may be optimal for the designer to not insure the agent against future uncertainty. Finally, we stress that their paper focuses on PPE types of equilibria which can't arise in this paper. To the best of our knowledge, [Eisenhuth '17] is the first paper considering a full- fledged mechanism design model of auctions with preferences which exhibit expectation- based loss aversion. He uses the equilibrium concept from [Koszegi, Rabin '07] (CPE) and solves for the optimal symmetric auction with symmetric bidders. His environment is most similar to timeline B in this paper.19 [Herweg et al. '10] introduce the same CPE preferences in the classical principal-agent model with moral hazard and show how the optimal contract is much simpler than in the classical model. In a new paper, [Benkert' 17] considers the optimal mechanism problem for the bilateral trade model where both buyer and seller behave according to CPE. He solves for the optimal mechanisms for a special distribution of types. Within the same timeline our paper additionally looks at other topics from classical Bayesian mechanism design: auctions, public goods. Moreover, we also address the issue of the optimal timing of the realization of the mechanism, which doesn't occur in either of the above-mentioned works. This paper contributes to the emerging literature on strategic interaction of agents whose utility depends on their beliefs about present and future consumption and money transfers. Relatedly, [Dato et al. '17] characterize existence properties of strategic equi- librium based on the preferences of [Koszegi, Rabin '06] (their PE and PPE concepts) and [Koszegi, Rabin '07] (their CPE concept) in finite normal-form games and focus mostly on existence and uniqueness as well as characterizing when equilibrium play is the same under classical and expectation-based loss averse preferences. The fact that ex-post effi- ciency in the public goods setting with timelines B,C,D may fail incentive compatibility (see subsection 3.2.1) is a reflection of the same non-existence phenomenon they identify 18In fact, the result in [Heidhues, Koszegi '14] ceases to hold if the agent is given the chance to decide about the purchase before seeing the distribution of prices in period 1. Ex-post participation constraints are less appropriate in settings where the value of the product to the consumer is revealed only upon consumption and the agent can commit to the mechanism before consumption. 19Similarly to our results in the online appendix [Eisenhuth '17] establishes that optimal auctions for CPE preferences are all-pay with a reference price. He also considers a model of wide-bracketing, which is assumed away in our model due to the separability assumption across the two dimensions, consumption and money. 10 in their model. 2 A screening model of loss aversion This section offers a tractable model of screening with news utility agents whose private information concerns their loss aversion parameters. Naturally, assuming that private information of an agent includes multiple parameters of her behavioral preferences leads to a multidimensional screening problem. Here we avoid the technical difficulties of mul- tidimensional mechanism design by assuming symmetry for loss aversion in the money and good dimension and that the designer knows all news utility parameters but one: the loss aversion parameter. We focus on a model of monopolistic screening where the buyers don't know the realization of their intrinsic utility at the moment of participation decision and choice of contract.20 Real life settings approximated by this model would be buying tickets to a concert from an unknown band, buying a book from an unknown author, or vacationing in an unknown destination, etc. 2.1 Set Up We assume the designer is a monopolist producing non-negative quantities of a good denoted by q at a fixed marginal cost c > 0.21 A buyer has intrinsic utility from a contract (q, t) of the form v(q)θ − t. Here θ is the intrinsic value of the good. v fulfills standard assumptions: v(0) = 0, v ≥ 0, v(cid:48) > 0, v(cid:48)(cid:48) < 0 and limx→0 v(cid:48)(x) = +∞. Moreover, for purely technical reasons we additionally require a weak growth condition on v: there exists some p > 1 so that it holds v(cid:48)(x) ≥ K Figure 2 below depicts the relevant timelines with news utility. We assume the timeline T ∈ {A, B, C} is either given through technological constraints or it is chosen by the designer. The informational assumptions of the screening model are as follows. vp−1(x) for some K > 0.22 Assumption (S) Intrinsic utility θ is distributed according to a probability distribution F with bounded support over the non-negative numbers. F is common knowledge and it fulfills m := Eθ∼F [θ] > 0 (on average the good yields positive intrinsic utility). All buyers put weight µg = µm = 1 on news utility and have λg = λm = λ. The distribution of λ has a continuously differentiable and strictly positive density g on [1, ¯λ] (2 ≥ ¯λ > 1) and its c.d.f. G is common knowledge.23 20It is possible to construct a more complicated model with signals which partly reveal the incomplete information about θ after or before the contract is signed. If the signals are public knowledge however, the more general case is easily reduced to a model similar to the one in this section. 21This can be relaxed to a weakly increasing marginal cost c and none of the results would qualitatively change. We keep a constant marginal cost throughout for ease of exposition. says that the marginal utility v(cid:48) doesn't fall too fast with x. 22This weak condition is crucial for our proof of existence of an optimal mechanism in timeline C. It 23As [Masatlioglu, Raymond '16] establish, λ ≤ 2 is a necessary requirement for the preferences of the agent to respect first-order stochastic monotonicity in the money dimension. They don't consider different timelines as here but their results about choice over monetary lotteries still hold qualitatively 11 Figure 2: Relevant timelines for the monopolistic screening model. Denote for future reference M := Eθ,s∼F [(θ − s)1{θ≥s}]. It is easy to see that M < m. The outside option which determines the pre-mechanism beliefs of each buyer type consists of a zero utility: zero amount of good and zero transfers to the designer are expected in the absence of any mechanism. We focus in this section on the case of deterministic mechanisms, i.e. we assume for simplicity in exposition that the monopolist doesn't possess a randomization device. We comment in the end of this section on how the results change with randomized mecha- nisms. Mechanisms consist of menus C = {(q(λ), t(λ))}λ∈[1,¯λ] the monopolist offers. This is a set of contracts indexed by loss aversion specifying the quantity of the good q and the price of that good at that quantity. In the framework of subsection 1.1 the buyers are agents facing a menu of lotteries over ∆([0,∞) × Θ × R) with the property that the marginals over the quantity q and payment t are degenerate. The lotteries in the menu are indexed by λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. In the remaining part of this section we characterize individual rationality and incen- tive compatibility for all timelines and finally look at the optimal timeline choice for the designer. 2.2 Incentive Compatibility and Individual Rationality 2.2.1 Incentive Compatibility Timeline A: payment schedules t ≥ 0. It is without loss of generality for optimal mechanisms to consider only If the agent has decided to participate and choose bundle (q(λ), t(λ)) then the news in our setting of timelines B,C (and therefore also D). 12 ADCBParticipationdecisioncontractchoiceƟ revealed,consumption,paymentsParticipationdecisiondelaydelaydelayParticipationdecisiondelayParticipationdecisionPlaydecisionOutcomeannouncedƟ revealed,consumption,paymentscontractchoicecontractchoiceƟ revealed,consumption,paymentsutility from the comparison with the pre-mechanism expectations is given by (4) She also experiences consumption utility v(q(λ))θ − t(λ), which at the decision moment is in expected utility terms v(q(λ))m − λt(λ). v(q(λ))m − t(λ). Gathering the terms together, we see that utility of a buyer of type λ from declaring λ is Denote 2mv(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)t(λ). ΓA(λ) = 2m 1 + λ . (5) We call ΓA(λ) the A-virtual type of the buyer. The term in the denominator reflects the negative surprise effect in the money dimension. The numerator reflects the surprise effect in the good dimension. The A-virtual type is a decreasing function of the agent's loss aversion parameter. Incentive compatibility is characterized by (cid:110) (cid:104) (cid:105)(cid:111) (1 + λ) ΓA(λ)v(q(λ)) − t(λ) = λ. arg max λ∈[1,¯λ] Timeline B: Again it is without loss of generality for optimal mechanisms to consider only payment schedules t ≥ 0. In this timeline if the buyer of type λ has decided to choose bundle (q(λ), t(λ)), she will first experience news utility from the comparison with the pre-mechanism expectations just as in timeline A. When the buyer learns her draw of the material valuation θ she experiences news utility in the good dimension from comparing the outcome to her previous belief v(q(λ))s where s is distributed according to F : (cid:90) v(q(λ)) (θ − s)1{θ≥s} + λ(θ − s)1{θ<s}F (ds). Due to the delay, she takes the expectation of this expression w.r.t. θ at the moment she decides whether to participate or not, so that her expected news utility from realization is given by the following expression (1 − λ)M v(q(λ)). There is no news utility term in the money dimension when θ is revealed as there is no uncertainty in the money dimension once a bundle has been chosen by the agent. Taking into account the expectation of the intrinsic utility v(q(λ))θ − t(λ) we see that decision utility of a buyer of type λ from choosing the contract corresponding to λ is Denote [2m + (1 − λ)M ] v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)t(λ) ΓB(λ) = 2m + (1 − λ)M 1 + λ . 13 We call this the B-virtual type of the agent. It is a decreasing function of her loss aversion parameter. The denominator reflects the surprise effect in the money dimension while the numerator reflects both the surprise as-well-as the realization effect in the consumption dimension. Incentive Compatibility is characterized by (1 + λ) ΓB(λ)v(q(λ)) − t(λ) = λ. arg max λ∈[1,¯λ] Timeline C. At the moment of contract choice the agent experiences no surprise effect as the contract doesn't constitute news anymore but she still takes into account the realization effect in expectation. Given this, Incentive Compatibility is characterized by [m + (1 − λ)M ]v(q(λ)) − t(λ) = λ. arg max λ∈[1,¯λ] Denote ΓC(λ) = m+(1−λ)M the C-virtual type. It includes the expected future news utility from the realization of the mechanism as well as the expected value of consumption. It is decreasing in the loss aversion parameter λ. Standard methods yield then the following characterization of incentive compatible mechanisms. Here we call an allocation rule q : [1, ¯λ]→R+ is implementable if there exists an incentive compatible mechanism C with allocation rule q. Proposition 2. 1) An allocation rule q : [1, ¯λ]→R+ is implementable if and only if q(·) is non-increasing. 2) (Mirrlees Representation) For any implementable q the corresponding payments t : [1, ¯λ]→R are given up to a type-independent constant by the following Mirrlees repre- sentations. (A) (B) tA(s) = ΓA(s)v(q(s)) − 2m tB(s) = ΓB(s)v(q(s)) − 2(m + M ) v(q(t)) (1 + t)2 dt, (cid:90) ¯λ v(q(t)) (1 + t)2 dt, s (cid:90) ¯λ (cid:90) s s (cid:104) (cid:110) (cid:110) (cid:105)(cid:111) (cid:111) (C) tC(s) = ΓC(s)v(q(s)) + M v(q(σ))dσ. The type-independent constant not depicted in part 2) of the Proposition is a fixed payment to the monopolist (or transfer to the agents) which is independent of the pri- vate information of the agents. In an optimal mechanism its value is determined by the individual rationality requirement. 1 2.2.2 Individual Rationality The following Proposition gives the individual rationality characterization for incentive compatible mechanisms where the payment schedules t are non-negative.24 Proposition 3. Fix a timeline T ∈ {A, B, C}. An incentive compatible contract C = {(q(λ), tT (λ))}λ∈[1,¯λ] is individually rational for timeline T if the following respective sets of inequalities are satisfied. 24This is without loss of generality for optimal mechanisms as we show in the appendix. 14 • For timelines T = A, B • For timeline C ΓT (λ)v(q(λ)) − tT (λ) ≥ 0, λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. ΓB(λ)v(q(λ)) − tC(λ) ≥ 0, λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. The expressions for timelines A, B are similar to ones from classical models except for the fact that one has to use modified virtual types which take into account news utility effects. For timeline C, at the participation stage the agent anticipates that she'll be truthful later, if she accepts an incentive compatible menu C. In all incentive compatible mecha- nisms in timeline C the payment schedule t(λ) is weakly decreasing in λ.25 Given this, and the fact that the monopolist can always offer the bundle (0, 0) to any type it follows that the optimal contract will never feature a net subsidy t(λ) < 0 for any type λ ∈ [1, ¯λ].26 It follows that in case of acceptance her utility if she is of type λ is given by V (λ) = [2m + (1 − λ)M ] v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)t(λ). Namely, the agent experiences the following utility items: news utility from accepting the mechanism, intrinsic expected utility from future consumption and finally expected future news utility from the realization effect. We show in the appendix that V (λ) can be rewritten as V (λ) = (1 + λ)(cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)f − (1 + λ)M (cid:90) λ 1 v(q(s))ds. where f is a type-independent payment. The individual rationality requirement can then be written as(cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − f − M (cid:90) λ v(q(s))ds ≥ 0, λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. The fact that different selves decide on participation and bundle choice creates a 'wedge' between individual rationality and incentive compatibility requirement. A mea- sure for this discrepancy is precisely the multiplicative factor appearing in the individual rationality constraint: 1 ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ) = (1 − λ)m + (λ2 − λ)M 1 + λ . 2.3 Optimal screening mechanisms and optimal timeline choice We consider the timelines one after the other.27 Finally, for the case that the monopolist can pick the timeline we establish general results about the optimality of the timeline. 25This follows immediately from the Mirrlees representation coupled with the envelope theorem. 26If this were not true then it would hold t(λ0) < 0 for every λ0 > λ. Going over to t(λ0) = 0 and q(λ0) = 0 for all λ0 ≥ λ preserves incentive compatibility but increases profits. 27Establishing the existence of an optimal mechanism in timelines A and B uses classical methods of pointwise maximization whereas the problem in timeline C can be rewritten into a calculus of variations problem with constraints for which we show existence of a solution and give a recipe in the online appendix on how to find it in many typical examples. 15 Timeline A. We establish in the appendix that the profit function for an incentive compatible and individually rational menu of contracts for timeline A looks as follows. (cid:90) ¯λ (cid:2)ΨA(s)v(q(s)) − cq(s)(cid:3) G(ds), ΠA = (6) with 1 ΨA(s) = ΓA(s) − 2m G(s) (1 + s)2g(s) . ΨA(s) is the virtual valuation for timeline A. The virtual type ΓA(s) is corrected for the informational rent of the agent represented here by 2m G(s) (1+s)2g(s). The monopolist problem is thus maximizing (6) under the constraint that q be non- increasing and that individual rationality is fulfilled. We give a specific example of the solution for timeline A. Example 1. Assume G = unif orm([1, 2]). We take F = unif orm([0, 1]) i.e. the intrinsic valuations are uniformly distributed q. The virtual over the interval [0, 1]. Finally, intrinsic utility is given by v(q) = valuation is calculated to be √ ΨA(s) = 2 (1 + s)2 , s ∈ [1, 2].28 The optimal allocation rule is qA(λ) = ΨA(λ)2 4c2 . In particular no type is excluded from the mechanism. One calculates that optimal profit for timeline A is RA(c) = 65 64·81·c. Timeline B. The profit function for an incentive compatible and individually rational mechanism for timeline B looks as follows. (cid:90) λ0 (cid:2)ΨB(s)v(q(s)) − cq(s)(cid:3) G(ds), ΠB = (7) with 1 ΨB(s) = ΓB(s) − 2(m + M ) G(s) (1 + s)2g(s) . ΨB is the virtual valuation for timeline B. Note that it is weakly lower than the virtual valuation for timeline A. This is because as noted in Proposition 1 the realization effect is negative in expectation due to loss aversion. In comparison to timeline A, this results in a lower virtual type due to lower informational rents. The problem of the monopolist is maximizing (7) under the constraint that q is non- increasing and that individual rationality is fulfilled. 28Note that this is always positive and decreasing. There is no need to exclude types of high loss aversion from the mechanism or to use ironing techniques. 16 Timeline C. We show in the appendix that the objective function of the designer can be written as (cid:40)(cid:34) (cid:90) λ 1 (cid:40)(cid:34) (cid:90) λ ΠC = f · G(λ) + ΓC(λ) + M G(λ) − G(λ) g(λ) v(q(λ)) − cq(λ) dG(λ) for a threshold type λ so that (q(λ), t(λ)) = (0, 0) whenever λ ≥ λ (exclusion). Thus the problem of the designer for timeline C is max λ∈[1,¯λ],f∈R,q(·) 1 ΓC(λ) + M G(λ) − G(λ) g(λ) + f v(q(λ)) − cq(λ) (cid:35) (cid:35) (cid:41) (cid:41) s.t. (1) q(·) is non-increasing, (2) (cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − M (cid:90) λ 1 v(q(s))ds ≥ f, λ ∈ [1, λ]. dG(λ) (8) Here ΨC(s, f ) = ΓC(s) + M G(λ)−G(s) g(s) + f for s ≤ λ is the virtual valuation for timeline B. The virtual type ΓC is again corrected for the information rent and the (net) lump-sum subsidy f to the participation self. Condition (2) in the above program is just a rewriting of the individual rationality constraint. f corresponds to a type-independent subsidy which may need to be paid to ensure individual rationality. This subsidy accounts for the externality which the self who chooses the bundle exerts on the participation self. We show that a solution for timeline C always exists. In the online appendix we also show how to characterize it completely under some regularity requirements which correspond to a no ironing condition in our setting. The second part of the following general result has a straightforward proof though. Proposition 4. 1) There always exists an optimal mechanism for timeline C. 2) If F has support in the non-negative numbers the optimal fixed payment f in an optimal mechanism for timeline C is negative, whenever profits are positive. 2) implies that in many cases the optimal payment schedule t(·) in timeline C is discontinuous in λ: high loss aversion types are excluded from the mechanism whereas all types who are served may receive a fixed, type-independent transfer from the monopolist to the agents, whenever the monopolist sells some positive amount. Due to the discrepancy between the self choosing the contract and the self deciding whether to participate the former self exerts an externality on the latter by disregarding the surprise effect. This externality can be partially alleviated without adversely affecting incentive compatibility in the second period by optimally transferring a fixed amount f < 0 to the self at time zero. Optimal timeline. Assuming that the monopolist can pick the timeline the following Theorem is the main result of this subsection. Theorem 1. For the screening model timeline A is weakly better than timeline B which is weakly better than timeline C. 17 That timeline A is better than B is a direct consequence of the fact that the virtual valuation for timeline B given by ΨB in (2.3) is strictly lower than the virtual valuation for timeline A given by ΨA. Timeline A and B share the surprise effects at the participation decision moment but the realization effect in the good dimension is absent from timeline B. This results in an increased willingness to pay for every type when compared to timeline B. Intuitively, timeline C may have a more favorable incentive compatibility situation overall than timeline A since the payments from the buyers are not scaled down by 1 + λ. The latter happens in timeline A because of the negative surprise effect in the money dimension. On the other hand, as Proposition 4 shows, whenever employing timeline C the monopolist has to subsidize participation with a lump-sum payment independent of types. As it turns out for our specification of the problem this subsidy is too costly even for small marginal costs c. The optimality of timeline A relies on two assumptions. First, our Assumption (S) corresponds to assuming a relatively 'small' λmµm in subsection 1.1. This makes for a small negative surprise effect in the money dimension in timeline A. Second, we have assumed that the monopolist can not offer stochastic payment schedules t(λ) ∈ ∆(R). If the latter was possible then the incentive compatibility situation in timeline C is on one hand better than with deterministic contracts since the monopolist can use type- dependent lotteries as an additional screening device and on the other hand worse as now for every type ceteris paribus the perceived payments are higher. We conjecture that relaxing these two assumptions may result in timeline C optimality in some cases whereas timeline A still dominates timeline B.29 3 Private information about intrinsic type In this section we look at multi-agent mechanism design under the assumption that pri- vate information concerns the intrinsic type of other players. Behavioral parameters of news utility are common knowledge. For simplicity of exposition we focus on agents whose intrinsic type spaces are identical. The results about incentive compatibility and individual rationality can be generalized to asymmetric agents without difficulty.30 3.1 Set Up We consider a group of agents i = 1, . . . , N who can potentially take part in a mech- anism. We assume throughout the designer has standard Expected Utility risk neutral preferences, is interested in revenue maximization and that she has full commitment. An agent i derives intrinsic utility from consumption of a profile a of consumption goods coming from a set of allocations A as well as from a (net) monetary transfer to the principal which is denoted by ti. Formally here A is assumed to be a compact, connected subset with non-empty interior of RN . We assume that intrinsic utility for each agent i with type θi is quasilinear and of the form (1). Types are one-dimensional and are given 29Details that timeline A still dominates B when relaxing the two assumptions are available upon request. 30See online appendix for applications to optimal mechanisms with asymmetric agents and timeline A in two cases: optimal auctions with asymmetric agents and bilateral trade. 18 by the interval Θ = [θ, ¯θ] consisting of non-negative numbers. θi is agent i's (intrinsic) type and we denote Θ = Θ1 × ··· × Θn the product of the type spaces. If the agent doesn't participate in the mechanism the value of her intrinsic utility in the allocation dimension is given by a number denoted vi(∅). We require throughout that vi(∅) is either the maximal or the minimal value that vi can take, i.e. (vi(∅) ∈ {sup vi, inf vi}).31 Moreover, in the money dimension we assume the agent doesn't expect any transfers in the absence of the mechanism.32 For the model presented in this section we make the following informational assump- tion. Assumption (A): The private information of the agent i consists of θi (her intrinsic type). The agents know their type at the outset of any interaction with the designer (interim stage). All agents and the designer have a common knowledge prior for the type profile (θ1, . . . , θN ). The types across agents are i.i.d. and the common marginal distribution of θi, denoted F , has a continuously differentiable, strictly positive density f : [θ, ¯θ]→R+. Figure 3: Timelines for the multiple agent model with uncertainty about intrinsic types. The timeline of the mechanism is either fixed due to technological constraints or a choice variable of the designer. In the latter case he declares at the beginning the timeline he commits to. As established in Proposition 1 the relevant timelines for the analysis are in Figure 3. For any fixed timeline the designer can in principle consider arbitrarily complicated mechanisms. We restrict the analysis without loss of generality to direct mechanisms. For a given timeline, a direct mechanism asks the agents to report their private information and assigns as a function of their reports an allocation a from A and (net) transfers ti to the designer. The restriction to direct mechanisms is justified by the revelation principle.33 31All of our applications both in the main paper as well as in the online appendix fulfill this assumption. 32The online appendix comments on the case of non-trivial outside options in the money dimension. Incentive compatibility and individual rationality characterizations are similar to the ones in this section. We focus here on the trivial case for ease of exposition. 33The revelation principle holds true for all models we consider in this section. We establish this fact in the Online Appendix. 19 ADCBParticipationdecisionPlaydecisionOutcomeannouncedPlaydecisionParticipationdecisionOutcomeannounceddelaydelaydelayParticipationdecisionPlaydecisionOutcomeannounceddelayParticipationdecisionPlaydecisionOutcomeannouncedFormally, a direct mechanism is a mapping which gives for each type report profile an allocation in A as well as payments from the agents to the designer together with a timeline T ∈ {A, B, C}. Formally, for any T ∈ {A, B, C} a direct mechanism is a map as follows. MT = (q, t1, t2, . . . , tn) : Θ1 × ··· × Θn→A × Rn. (9) The uncertainty each agent faces in a given mechanism MT derives only from not knowing the other agents' types. In terms of subsection 1.1 we are considering agents who are offered menus Mi of lotteries over ∆(A× Θ−i×R) parametrized by θi ∈ [θ, ¯θ] and who have to time their decisions according to the timeline T . Given the general form of mechanisms allowed and the full support assumption on F it is without loss of generality to assume that the mechanisms are not randomized, i.e. that the designer doesn't have a randomization device at her disposal.34 i 0 (cid:90) 1 (cid:90) 1 i (vi(cGa(p))θi − vi(cH a(p))θi) dp + µm ξg 3.2 Incentive Compatibility and Individual Rationality In the following we take as given a direct mechanism MT as in (9). Fix an agent i ∈ {1, . . . , N}. For any distribution G ∈ ∆(A×R) giving the distribution of pairs (a, ti) induced from the play under the mechanism over A × R the marginal of G over A is denoted by Ga and over ti is denoted by Gt. We call the following term the news utility of agent i from changing beliefs from H to G when the type of the agent is θi. i (cH t(p) − cGt(p)) dp. Ni(GHθi) = µg ξm (10) Here µg i are the agent-specific behavioral parameters for news utility as in subsection 1.1. For future reference we also define the aggregate news utility parameters Λg i = µg Assume that in the mechanism play other agents −i decide to participate and report their types truthfully to the designer, whereas agent i of type θi decides to report θi upon a positive participation decision. Define Vi(θ) as the expected value of vi and Ti(θi) the expected value of ti under these reporting strategies from the perspective of agent i.35 i (θi) = Eθ−i[max{ti(θi, θ−i), 0}], the the expected transfer of type θi from Finally, define T + agent i to the designer. case vi(∅) = inf a∈A vi(a) is The news utility from the realization effect if the agent decides to participate for the i , λg i − 1) and Λm i − 1). i = µm i (λm i , µm i , λm i (λg i 0 Ni(θi∅θi) = µg i Vi(θi)θi − µg whereas for the case vi(∅) = supa∈A vi(a) it is i Vi(θi)θi − λg Ni(θi∅θi) = λg i µg i µg i v(∅)θi − µm i Ti(θ) − Λm i T + i (θ), i v(∅)θi − µm i Ti(θ) − Λm i T + i (θ). In contrast to the first case of vi(∅) = inf a∈A vi(a), in the second case of vi(∅) = supa∈A vi(a) the utility difference between pre-mechanism belief and post-participation decision is weighted additionally by λg i . This is because of loss aversion. 34She can use the type draws θ to induce desired distributions on payments. 35Formally, Vi(θi) = Eθ−i[q(θi, θ−i)] and Ti(θi) = Eθ−i[t(θi, θ−i)]. 20 Consider now the news utility from the realization of the outcome of the mechanism for timelines B and C. If agent i of type θi has reported θi and the realized part of the outcome of the mechanism relevant to agent i is (cid:16) (cid:17) q(θi, θ−i), ti(θi, θ−i) , in addition to intrinsic utility she experiences news utility in the good dimension of θ−i:vi(q(θi,θ−i))>vi(q(θi,θ−i)) i λg i + µg θ−i:vi(q(θi,θ−i))<vi(q(θi,θ−i)) (vi(q(θi, θ−i)) − vi(q(θi, θ−i)))dF−i(θ−i) (vi(q(θi, θ−i)) − vi(q(θi, θ−i)))dF−i(θ−i) (11) Again, the second summand which is non-positive, is weighted by λg aversion in the good dimension. The agent experiences news utility in the money dimension given by i due to the loss (cid:90) µg i (cid:90) (cid:90) µg i (cid:90) θ−i:ti(θi,θ−i)<ti(θi,θ−i) i λg i − µg θ−i:ti(θi,θ−i)>ti(θi,θ−i) (ti(θi, θ−i) − ti(θi, θ−i))dF−i(θ−i) (ti(θi, θ−i)) − ti(θi, θ−i))dF−i(θ−i). (12) The news utility experienced at the realization moment of the mechanism, denoted Ni((θi, θ−i)θiθi), is thus the sum of (11) and (12). For timelines B and C at the report decision moment the agent takes into account the news utility from the realization effect in expectation. We show that agent i of type θi has an overall term of expected realization news utility of − Λg i (θi)θi − Λm i Γg i ωi(θi), (13) i (θi) and ωi(θi) are non-negative. These 'frictions' are zero if and only if respec- where Γg tively the allocation q and the transfer ti don't depend on the realization of the types of the other players, that is don't depend on θ−i. The realization effect thus lowers the deci- sion utility of an agent at the reporting stage. Note that in the screening model of section 2 we only had one such expected news utility term M which was exogenously given. Here i (θi) and ωi(θi) are influenced by the designer through the expected news utility terms Γg the mechanism choice as well as the timeline choice, if the latter is a choice variable. This additional flexibility has important implications for revenue maximization as we will see. The following Proposition registers the decision utilities for agents in each of the participation and reporting stages. Proposition 5. For the timelines in Figure 3, the decision utilities at the type reporting stage have a quasilinear, product form. Namely, the utility of agent i of type θi from reporting type θi is of the form i (θi)θi − Υt Depending on the timeline t the functions W t the case vi(∅) = inf vi V t i (θiθi) = W t i( θi), t = A, B, C. (14) i : [θ, ¯θ]→R have the following form in i , Υt 21 • Timeline A: W A i (θi) = (1 + µg i )Vi(θi) − µg i v(∅), ΥA i (θi) = (1 + µm i )Ti(θi) + Λm i T + i (θi). • Timeline B: W B i (θi) = (1+µg i )Vi(θi)−µg i v(∅)−Λg i Γg i (θi), ΥB i (θi) = (1+µm i )Ti(θi)+Λm i (T + i (θi)+ωi(θi)). • Timeline C: W C i (θi) = Vi(θi) − Λg i Γg i (θi), ΥC i (θi) = Ti(θi) + Λm i ωi(θi). For the case vi(∅) = sup vi the only change is in timelines t = A, B where the terms W t change into i • Timeline A: • Timeline B: W A i (θi) = (1 + λg i µg i )Vi(θi) − λg i v(∅), i µg W B i (θi) = (1 + λg i µg i )Vi(θi) − λg i µg i v(∅) − Λg i Γg i (θi). Note that (14) is reminiscent of the classical utility assumption (1). We name the terms W t i perceived valuations. In the equilibrium of the mechanism they give the marginal expected valuation of the allocation for the agent after taking into account news utility effects, be it the surprise effect (timelines A,B), the realization effect (timelines B,C) or both (timeline B). When news utility is absent, all perceived valuations W t i are equal to the expected intrinsic valuation Vi. We name the terms Υt i the perceived transfers. In case news utility is absent, these terms become equal to the expected interim transfers Ti for all timelines. In the equilib- rium of the mechanism they give the effect of money transfers on the decision utility in the type reporting stage after taking into account news utility effects. With these definitions, classical results help give a full characterization of incentive compatibility for all timelines. Proposition 6 (Incentive Compatibility). A direct mechanism M is incentive compat- ible for the timeline T ∈ {A, B, C} if and only if the perceived valuations W T i are non- decreasing. at the reporting stage V T If this is the case, we have the following Mirrlees representation for the interim utility i (θi) = V T i (θiθi) V T i (θi) = V T i (θiθi) + i (s)ds. (cid:90) θi θi W T (cid:90) θi θi W T i (s)ds. It also holds i (θi) = W T ΥT i (θi)θi − V T i (θi) − 22 Analogously to the classical case, incentive compatibility is equivalent to a mono- tonicity condition. Due to news utility effects this monotonicity condition is applied to perceived valuations instead of expected intrinsic valuations. We assume the outside option of the mechanism is degenerate: We now turn to the individual rationality requirement for incentive compatible mech- anisms. For all timelines each agent experiences the surprise effect of the mechanism and, given sophistication, takes into account her own future behavior when deciding to par- ticipate. In particular, when facing an incentive compatible mechanism she knows she is going to reveal her true type to the designer at the reporting stage. Under the assumption that the other agents play truthfully reporting the correct type induces a distribution over good consumption and money transfers. for agent i of type θi the outside option is vi(∅)θi. The mechanism is individually rational for an agent i when the equilibrium utility it offers in period one is at least as high as vi(∅)θi for all types θi ∈ [θ, ¯θ]. This equilibrium utility incorporates not only the expected consumption and transfers from the realization of the mechanism, but also news utility in the form of the surprise effect for all timelines and in the form of the expected realization effect for timelines B,C. The following Proposition summarizes this in participation utility formulas. Proposition 7. (Individual Rationality) An incentive compatible mechanism M is indi- vidually rational for the respective timelines if the following is fulfilled. • Timeline A: W A • Timeline B: W B • Timeline C: W B i (θi)θi − ΥA i (θi)θi − ΥB i (θi)θi − ΥB i (θi) ≥ vi(∅)θi, for all θi ∈ [θ, ¯θ]. i (θi) ≥ vi(∅)θi, for all θi ∈ [θ, ¯θ]. i (θi) ≥ vi(∅)θi, for all θi ∈ [θ, ¯θ]. Individual rationality for timelines A and B is equivalent to the requirement that the equilibrium decision utility in the reporting stage exceeds the value of the outside option vi(∅)θi. This is because in both of these timelines there is no delay between the participation decision and the reporting decision. In contrast, in timeline C the reporting decision doesn't take into account the bygone surprise effect. The participation self has to take both news utility effects into account. Therefore the participation decision utilities are the same as for timeline B, except that the terms Vi, Ti, T + i are now determined in the reporting stage. 3.2.1 Ex-post Efficiency in public good provision In this subsection we illustrate how loss aversion affects incentive compatibility results from classical Bayesian mechanism design. Namely, we show how ex-post efficiency in a symmetric public good provision setting may fail to be incentive compatible, even though it never does so in the absence of news utility effects. We also illustrate how this issue may be overcome whenever there are enough players in the game. Assume a society of N ≥ 2 identical agents whose intrinsic utility of a public good is private information and is independently and identically distributed according to F with support [θ, θ] with θ ≥ 0.36 Assume the agents have quasilinear intrinsic utility and denote by q the probability of provision of the public good: the intrinsic valuation has 36The last requirement means the public good would always be (weakly) desirable if it is implemented without transfers. 23 the form v(q) = q. Let c(N ) be the average costs so that providing the public good will cost to the social planner N c(N ). Maximizing welfare under complete information and under the assumption that the social planner has the funds for provision gives the ex-post efficiency rule: (cid:40) 1 if (1 + µg)(cid:80)n 0 otherwise. i=1 θi ≥ N c(N ) q(θ1, . . . , θn) = (15) This is the first-best rule under news utility. Denote by c(N ) = c(N ) 1+µg , the normalized per-person provision costs. If an agent is of type θ her interim probability of public good provision under (15) is Q(θ) = 1 − F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ).37 In the classical setting without news utility and loss aversion ex-post efficiency is always incentive compatible. This is not always the case in the presence of news utility.38 Proposition 8. Assume (1 + µg)θ < c(N ) < (1 + µg)¯θ. 1) Ex-post efficiency is always incentive compatible for timeline A. If Λg ≤ 1 + µg then ex-post efficiency is incentive compatible for timeline B. If Λg ≤ 1 then ex-post efficiency is incentive compatible for timeline C. 2) If Λg > 1+µg, it can happen that q is not incentive compatible for timeline B, for ex- ample if F is concentrated in the vicinity of θ and N c(N ) is big enough. This impossibility becomes more common with higher loss aversion in the consumption dimension. The same kind of result holds true for timeline C, if Λg > 1. 3) Let E[F ] be the mathematical expectation of the distribution F . If θ < lim supn→∞ c(N ) < E[F ], then q is always incentive compatible whenever N is high enough with every timeline. 1 Note that in timeline A the model is isomorphic to a classical quasi-linear model where the type spaces are [(1 + µg)θ, (1 + µg)¯θ] and the transfers of each agent are scaled down by 1+λmµm . The same argumenst as in the classical setting deliver all of 1). The result of part 2) of Proposition 8 for timelines B, C is an instance of equilibrium non-existence. It is similar to the result in Theorem 1 of [Dato et al. '17] who show lack of existence of equilibrium in the related CPE model.39 When N is very large the comparison between average intrinsic valuation E[F ] and average costs scaled by 1 + µg decides on provision. Due to the law of large numbers then, if the average costs of provision fulfill the inequality in part 3) of the Proposition, the good is provided with high ex-ante probability so that the expected news utility terms from the realization effect weigh less on the decision of the agent. This effect helps preserve incentive compatibility even under relatively high loss aversion. sum of N i.i.d. draws of F . 37Here with F ∗(N ) we denote the N -times convolution of a distribution F , i.e. the distribution of the 38Ex-post efficiency is always incentive compatible with news utility if c(N ) ≤ (1 + µg)θ or if c(N ) ≥ (1+µg)¯θ. We omit these uninteresting cases and focus on the interesting case (1+µg)θ < c(N ) < (1+µg)¯θ in the following. 39CPE is defined in [Koszegi, Rabin '07] and has become popular in the applied behavioral literature. [Masatlioglu, Raymond '16] show that when CPE is interpreted as a static risk preference it leads to choice over lotteries which may violate monotonicity with respect to first-order-stochastic-dominance (FOSD), whenever the loss aversion parameter λm is high enough. Part 2) of the above Proposition is a result in the same spirit. 24 + :(cid:80)n 3.3 Optimal Symmetric Auctions In this subsection we focus on symmetric unit auctions.40 We first define the environment. i=1 qi ≤ 1} be the feasible allocations of a single Let ∆ = {(q1, q2, . . . , qN ) ∈ RN A direct mechanism M for the auction with a fixed timeline T ∈ {A, B, C} is a unit of a good to be auctioned off between N bidders. mapping (q1, . . . , qN , t1, . . . , tN ) : Θ→∆ × Rn giving as a function of reports for each agent the probability that she gets the good and the payment to the auctioneer. We make the classical assumption vi(q) = qi, i.e. the intrinsic value of the good of an agent i is equal to the probability that the good ends up with agent i. To ensure that there are no incentive compatibility issues as in subsection 3.2.1 we add a parametric restriction for the news utility parameters to the classical regularity assumption for the virtual valuation of the agents. Assumption (A2) • No Dominance of News Utility in the good dimension: Λg = µg(λg − 1) ≤ 1. • Regularity: The virtual valuation of F given by the function γ(t) : [θ, ¯θ]→R, γ(t) = t − 1−F (t) f (t) is strictly increasing. The restriction for the aggregate news utility parameter ensures that no bidder shows preference for a stochastically dominated allocation in the good dimension in timelines A and B.41 Regularity corresponds to the classical assumption first introduced in [Myerson '81]. It is fulfilled for many natural examples and allows for simple characterizations of the optimal auction.42 Proposition 9. 1) Under Assumption (A2) the optimal allocation rule for timelines A, B is the same as the Myersonian rule, that is, given θ∗ such that γ(θ∗) = 0 sell to any of agents with the highest type θm = maxi≤n θi as long as θm ≥ θ∗. 2) Optimal auctions in timeline B are all-pay. That is, it is optimal to fully insure the bidder against the uncertainty she is facing in the transfers. 3) Optimal auctions in timeline C are usually not all-pay. That is, it may be optimal to not fully insure a positive measure of types against the uncertainty they are facing in the money dimension. Moreover, the optimal threshold type is usually different from the one in timelines A and B. 40The online appendix contains further results: optimal unit auctions for asymmetric agents in timeline A as well as optimal symmetric auctions for timeline B. In both cases we show how news utility changes results and intuitions from the classical setting. 41Recall the related discussion in [Masatlioglu, Raymond '16]. This parameter restriction also appears in other settings in the applied behavioral literature, such as [Herweg et al. '10]. 42For timelines A and B one could use the methods from [Toikka '11] whenever Λg > 1. The model here is separable according to the terminology in [Toikka '11] (see section 3 of his paper). 25 An indirect optimal auction is an auction with a reservation price and which follows the respective timeline. In the case of timeline B it is additionally all-pay: each bidder has to pay her bid. Bidders who would never bid above the reservation price bid zero and pay zero. Part 1) in the case of timeline A follows closely the standard classical proof for symmet- ric unit auctions.43 The case of timeline B follows immediately from (the more general) Proposition 6 in the online appendix. Part 2) follows from the general all-pay result for timeline B which is proven in the online appendix (see Theorem 1 there). A related result is known in the classical literature on Expected Utility agents: optimal revenue maximizing auctions feature degenerate transfers whenever an agent's Bernoulli utility is separable in the consumption and money dimension and the agent is risk averse w.r.t. money (see [Maskin, Riley '84]). In timeline C the auctioneer has an additional variable he can use to give incentives for truth-telling in the reporting stage: the expected news utility terms in the money dimension given by ω(θ). Its usage comes at a cost as ceteris paribus an ω(θ) > 0 lowers the interim equilibrium utility in the reporting stage for type θ. Thus, when compared to timeline A, timeline C besides the advantage that any expected payments are not shaded down as in timeline A because of the missing surprise effect in the money dimension, it has the additional advantage of having one more choice variable for the auctioneer. Timeline A has the advantage of lacking the negative expected news utility term from the realization effect, which implies that there is no need to subsidize individual rationality as it is usually necessary in timeline C. We show numerically that in many parameter constellations for timeline C the auctioneer decides to make use of ω(θ), i.e. leaves some of the types with risk in the money dimension so as to help incentive compatibility in the reporting stage. The next example illustrates this optimal distortion in the money dimension. Example 3. Consider an auction with two symmetric agents who satisfy the follow- ing assumptions: λg = 1.2, µg = 1, µmλm = 1 and distribution of intrinsic type F = unif orm([1, 2]). Note that the lowest intrinsic type has strictly positive utility from getting the good. Figure 3.3 depicts the optimal distortion in the money dimension for the case of timeline C. Here, optimal fric is the following map as a function of types, [1, 2] (cid:51) θ→cmω(θ), where cm = λmµm 1+λmµm Λm is a normalizing constant depending only on λm, µm. Note that the distortion in the money dimension is decreasing and that there is no distortion at the top.44 Another feature of optimal auctions in timeline C is that now the threshold type the auctioneer uses to decide whether to sell the unit at all is different from the classical 43See e.g. chapter 3 of [Borgers '15]. 44The monotonicity in distortion is not a general feature as other numerical exercises show (available upon request). For example, an inverse-U shaped distortion is possible if F = unif orm([0, 1]): auctioneer distorts only intermediate types in the money dimension. The no-distortion at the top property seems to be fulfilled in many numerical examples. 26 Figure 4: Friction in the money dimension as a function of type for Example 4. Myerson one γ(θ∗). The auctioneer has to weigh different effects in timeline C: types have to be subsidized for participating because of the wedge between incentive compatibility and individual rationality and she has to decide which subset of types to fully insure in the money dimension so as to maximize incentives of truthtelling after a positive participation decision. As news utility parameters are varied but so as to keep Λg ≤ 1 satisfied, the optimal balance of these effects may result for a fixed F fulfilling regularity in both a higher or lower threshold than the classical threshold θ∗ (which satisfies γ(θ∗) = 0). 3.3.1 Timeline Optimality In this subsection we assume the timeline is a choice variable of the auctioneer and consider its optimality. Theorem 2. 1) Timeline A always dominates timeline B in terms of revenue maximiza- tion. 2) There is no uniform ranking of timelines A and C in terms of revenue maximization. When compared to timeline A, timeline B features the same news utility effects except for an additional negative realization effect coming from the negative expected news utility in the good dimension. This lowers ceteris paribus for timeline B the willingness to pay of a bidder so that timeline A is always preferred for revenue maximization. The second part is proven by example. Example 4. We take the same data as Example 4 with the only difference that now we don't fix µmλm but instead vary it in the interval [1, 2]. We look at timelines A, C. 27 1.01.21.41.61.82.00.00.10.20.3typeoptimal fricFigure 5: Auction revenues for timelines A (blue) and C (red) for friction in the money dimension in the range [1, 2]. When µmλm is low the payments of the agent in timeline A are not shaded as much due to the negative surprise effect in the money dimension. This, and the fact that timeline C features a negative realization effect as well as a possible lump-sum subsidy for participation yield optimality of timeline A whenever µmλm is low. When µmλm is high the advantages of timeline C come to bear: there is no shading of payments due to the negative surprise effect in the money dimension and there is an additional (albeit costly) variable which can be used to give incentives in the reporting stage. While it is true that individual rationality may need a lump-sum subsidy, the subsidy is on average small because the lowest possible intrinsic type (θ = 1) loses a lot in terms of intrinsic utility in case of non-participation, her outside option being zero overall utility. In fact, numerical results available upon request show that the optimal timeline in this example is indeed A if we change the distribution of intrinsic types in Example 4 to F = unif orm([0, 1]). 4 Conclusions In this paper we have considered agents whose preferences are sensitive to changes of beliefs and additionally feature loss aversion. Under the assumption that agents are sophisticated about future behavior we have characterized features of optimal mechanism design in two different models: one where a monopolist screens a single agent according to their loss aversion parameter and one where multiple agents face uncertainty regarding the intrinsic types of the other agents. This work can be extended along different directions. For simplicity we have assumed that there is no discounting of time. This makes two of the possible timelines equivalent for all purposes. Relaxing that assumption is a fruitful didactic exercise as it would give a more complete picture for the characterization of optimal timeline design. A major assumption to relax in our model is sophistication. Allowing for naive or partially naive agents in our setting will eventually lead to changes regarding timeline optimality as well as changes in the features of optimal mechanisms. To see how, consider timeline C and assume that the self who decides about participation assumes erroneously that the self who decides about play will stick to her optimal plans. This will imply that the participation-decision self will behave the same in timelines B and C. Knowing 28 1.01.21.41.61.82.00.390.400.410.420.430.44friction in the money dimensionprofitthis, she won't ask for a lump-sum subsidy in order to participate as was the case under the sophistication assumption. Ceteris paribus this lowers the implementation costs for timeline C for the designer. We conjecture that in the case of naive agents timeline C becomes optimal in many more cases than it does in the case of sophisticated agents. We haven't considered the case where different agents may be in different timelines or the case where the timeline is not common knowledge for all agents at the start of the game. Moreover, we haven't solved for the optimal timeline in the case of auctions with asymmetric agents. These non-trivial extensions are left for future research. Finally, a new strand of literature started by papers like [Rey, Salanie '01] and [Maskin, Moore '99] considers designers who don't have full commitment. Relaxing the full commitment as- sumption in our setting is a very interesting topic left for future research. References [Benkert' 17] Benkert, J.M. Bilateral Trade with Loss-Averse Agents, working paper, Jan- uary 2017 version [Borgers '15] Borgers, T. An Introduction to the Theory of Mechanism Design, Oxford University Press 2015 [Carbajal, Ely '14] Carbajal, J-C. and Ely, J. A model of price discrimination under loss aversion and state contingent reference points, working paper 2014 [Dacorogna '08] Dacorogna, B. Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Springer Verlag, 2008 [Dato et al. '17] Dato, S., Grunewald, A., Mueller, D. and Strack, P. Expectation-Based Loss Aversion and Strategic Interaction, working paper 2017, available in SSRN [Durrett '10] Durrett, R. Probability: Theory and Examples, Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Eisenhuth '17] Eisenhuth, R. Reference Dependent Mechanism Design, forthcoming in Economic Theory Bulletin, 2018 [Eliaz, Spiegler '06] Eliaz, K, and Spiegler, R. Contracting with Diversely Naive Agents, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 73, No.3, pp. 689 -- 714 [Eliaz, Spiegler '08] Eliaz, K, and Spiegler, R. Consumer optimism and price discrimina- tion, Theoretical Economics Vol. 3 pp. 459 -- 497 [Englmaier et al '17] Englmaier, F., Fahn, M. and Schwarz, M.A. Long-Term Employ- ment Relations when Agents are Present Biased, CESIFO Working Paper No. 6159 [Ely et al. '15] Ely, J, Frankel, A. and Kamenica, A. Suspense and Surprise, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 215-260 [Gelfand, Fomin '00] Gelfand, I.M. and Fomin, S.V. Calculus of Variations, Dover Pub- lications, 2000 29 [Gul '91] Gul, F. A Theory of Disappointment Aversion, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 667-686 [Hahn et al. '18] Hahn, J-H., Kim, J., Kim, S-H. and Lee, J. Price Discrimination with Loss Averse Consumers, Economic Theory, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 681 -- 728 [Heidhues, Koszegi '10] Heidhues, P. and Koszegi, B. Exploiting Naıvete about Self- Control in the Credit Market, American Economic Review Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 2279- 2303 [Heidhues, Koszegi '14] Heidhues, P. and Koszegi, B. Regular Prices and Sales, Theoret- ical Economics, Vol. 9, (2014) pp. 217-251 [Heidhues, Koszegi '17] Heidhues, P. and Koszegi, B. Naivete-based Discrimination, The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 132 No. 2, pp. 1019-1054 [Herweg et al. '10] Herweg, F., Muller, D. and Weinschenk, P. Binary Payment Schemes: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion, American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 5 (2010) pp. 2451-2477 [Kahneman, Tversky '79] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decisions under risk, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No.2 (1979) pp. 263-292 [Koszegi '10] Koszegi, B. Utility from anticipation and personal equilibrium, Economic Theory, Vol. 44, No.3 (2010) pp. 415-444 [Koszegi, Rabin '06] Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M. A Model of Reference Dependent Prefer- ences, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121, No.4 (2006) pp.1133-65 [Koszegi, Rabin '07] Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M. Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes, American Economic Review, Vol. 97, No.4 (2007) pp. 1047-73 [Koszegi, Rabin '09] Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M. Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans, American Economic Review, Vol. 99, No.3 (2009) pp. 909-936 [Masatlioglu, Raymond '16] Masatlioglu, Y. and Raymond, C. Reference-Dependent Con- sumption Plans, American Economic Review, Vol. 106, No.9 (2009) pp. 2760-2782 [Maskin, Moore '99] Maskin, E. and Moore, J. Implementation and Renegotiation, Vol. 66, No. 1, Special Issue: Contracts, pp. 39-56 [Maskin, Riley '84] Maskin, E. and Riley, J. Optimal Auctions with Risk Averse Buyers, Econometrica, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 1473-1518 [Matthey '08] Matthey, A. Yesterday's expectation of tomorrow determines what you do today: The role of reference-dependent utility from expectations working paper 2008 [Myerson '81] Myerson, R. Optimal Auction Design, Mathematics of Operations Re- search, Vol. 6, No.1 (1981) pp. 58-73 [Myerson, Satterthwaite '83] Myerson, R. and Satterthwaite, M. Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.29 (1983) pp. 265-281 30 [Pagel '17] Pagel, M. Prospective Gain-Loss Utility: Ordered vs. Separated Comparison, working paper 2017 [Rey, Salanie '01] Rey, P. and Salanie, B. Long-term, Short-term and Renegotiation: On the Value of Commitment in Contracting, Econometrica, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 597-619 [Rosato, Tymula '16] Rosato, A. and Tymula, A. Loss Aversion and Competition in Vick- rey Auctions: Money Ain't No Good, working paper 2016 [Rudin '91] Rudin, W. Functional Analysis, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, 1991 [Sprenger '15] Sprenger, C. An Endowment Effect for Risk: Experimental Tests of Stochastic Reference Points, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 123, No. 6 (2015) pp. 1456-1499 [Toikka '11] Toikka, J. Ironing Without Control, Journal of Economic Theory, 146 (2011) pp. 2510-2526 Appendices A Auxiliary Results A result on expected future news utility terms. Consider first a one dimensional model. Here we skip the indices j = g, m for simplicity. Whenever G is a degenerate distribution corresponding to getting r with probabil- ity one, we write for the news utility term comparing the degenerate distribution to H N (rH). It holds N (rH) = Ez∼H[ξ(r − z)], where ξ is a piecewise linear gain-loss valuation function as in (2). The expected news utility from the realization of H is denoted by −ω(H) and it holds ω(H) = Er∼H[N (rH)]. The following technical Lemma is easy to prove.45 Lemma 1. It holds ω(H) = Λ (cid:90) (cid:90) (z − w)dH(z)dH(w). {z>w} ω(H) is nonnegative and equal to zero if and only if H is a degenerate distribution. Moreover, whenever H is supported in the non-negative numbers it holds 45Note that a similar result has been proven in the CPE setting in [Eisenhuth '17]. See Lemma 1 there. Since the proof of our Lemma follows word-for-word his argument we skip it here. ω(H) ≤ ΛE[H]. 31 We have considered a model, where the uncertainty is one-dimensional. Given the separability assumptions we make in Subsection 1.1 this result implies immediately the proof of part 1) in Proposition 1. Image of news utility terms as a function of distributions. The following is a characterization for the image of the pair (ω(H), E[H]) as a function of the one- dimensional distribution H. Lemma 2. For every element (x, y) ∈ R+ × R there exists a binary distribution H = L(p, b, d) = pδb + (1 − p)δd with b ≥ d and p ∈ (0, 1) such that (ω(H), E[H]) = (x, y). Proof. If x = 0 then just pick H = δy. So let's focus on the case x > 0 which corresponds to b > d. Then for a binary lottery, the system of equations we have to solve is (cid:40) d + p(b − d) = y, p(1 − p)(b − d) = x. But this is clearly solvable in p, b, d. Pick for example p = 1 2, which leads to b = y + 2x, d = y − 2x. This Lemma shows that the designer in the multi-agent model can use loss aversion in the money dimension to give additional incentives for truth-telling once the agents are locked-in after a positive participation decision. Indeed, for a fixed agent i and type θi in the auction model the distributions H correspond to the distributions on R generated as an image distribution of ti(θi, θ−i) under the product measure F N−1(θ−i). Note that because of our assumptions this measure has full-support on [θ, ¯θ]N−1. It follows that one can induce any Borel measure H which is absolutely continuous w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure by appropriate choice of the (deterministic) payment functions ti. Note that the expected news utility term ω here corresponds to M in the screening model which was exogenously given there. In the multi-agent model ω becomes endogenous. An abstract Incentive Compatibility characterization Proposition 10. A direct mechanism M as in (9) is incentive compatible if and only if the corresponding perceived valuations Wi are non-decreasing. in equilibrium Vi(θi) = Vi(θiθi) If this is the case, we have the following Mirrlees representation for the interim utility Vi(θi) = Vi(θiθi) + Wi(s)ds. (cid:90) θi θi (cid:90) θi It also holds Υi(θi) = Wi(θi)θi − Vi(θ) − Wi(s)ds. The proof is a trivial adaptation of the proof of the Mirrlees representation in the classical quasilinear utility model. See [Borgers '15] for the classical proof. θi 32 (16) (17) B Proofs for Section 2 We start with the analysis for timeline B as that for timeline A is very similar, yet simpler. Analysis for timeline C is more involved due to the wedge between individual rationality and incentive compatibility. B.0.1 Analysis for timeline B Let U (s) = (1 + s)[ΓB(s)v(q(s)) − t(s)] = (1 + s)W (s) be the utility of buyer of type s in an incentive compatible mechanism. Then individual rationality is tantamount to U (s) ≥ 0 equivalent to W (s) ≥ 0, ¯λ ≥ s ≥ 1. Just as in the classical setting (see chapter 2 of [Borgers '15]) one can show that W is differentiable a.e. with W (cid:48)(s) = − U (s) (1 + s)2 U(cid:48)(s) 1 + s m − m − M 1 + s = = −2(m + M )v(q(s)) . (1 + s)2 v(q(s)) − t(s) 1 + s − −t(s) + ΓB(s)v(q(s)) 1 + s Here we have used the envelope theorem for the optimization problem of the agent. For any incentive compatible mechanism it follows with the Mirrlees representation that (cid:90) s ¯λ (cid:90) ¯λ s v(q(t)) (1 + t)2 dt. W (s) − W (¯λ) = W (cid:48)(t)dt = 2(m + M ) We can therefore write t(s) = ΓB(s)v(q(s)) − 2(m + M ) (cid:90) ¯λ s v(q(t)) (1 + t)2 dt − W (¯λ), λ0 ≥ s ≥ 1. The fact that W is decreasing for any incentive compatible mechanism implies that indi- vidual rationality is fulfilled if and only if W (¯λ) ≥ 0. An optimal mechanism will have W (¯λ) = 0. In all, the profit function is (cid:34) (cid:90) ¯λ (cid:90) ¯λ (cid:35) Π = ΓB(s)v(q(s)) − 2(m + M ) 1 s v(q(t)) (1 + t)2 dt − cq(s) G(ds). The problem of the monopolist consists of maximizing this expression w.r.t.46 q non- increasing. Doing the usual Fubini transformation for the double integral one gets (cid:90) ¯λ Π = (cid:2)ΨB(s)v(q(s)) − cq(s)(cid:3) G(ds), 46'w.r.t.' means 'with respect to'. 1 33 with ΨB(s) = ΓB(s) − 2(m + M ) G(s) (1 + s)2g(s) . ΨB(s) is the virtual valuation in this model. If it is non-increasing, then one can maximize the integrand point-wise to get the optimal solution. In that case one can calculate the FOC µ [Ψ(s)v(cid:48)(q(s)) − c] = 0, where µ is a Kuhn Tucker parameter, which is zero, as long as ΨB(s) ≤ 0 and otherwise it is positive. The corresponding assumption of regularity from the classical setting (see [Myerson '81] or [Borgers '15]) is the following. Regularity for timeline B 47 4m + 7M 2(m + M ) ≥ G(λ) g(λ) (cid:20) 2 1 + λ (cid:21) g(cid:48)(λ) g(λ) + λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. , (18) If Ψ is not non-increasing, then one can use ironing techniques from [Toikka '11] to solve for bunching. Conditions in his paper are fulfilled since the model here is separable according to his terminology (see section 3 of his paper). B.0.2 Analysis for timeline A The calculations for timeline A are virtually the same as for timeline B, except that the terms involving M are missing because there is no realization effect in timeline A. The formal analysis is word-for-word the same as in timeline B except that now we have to set M = 0 everywhere in the calculations. In particular, the regularity assumption for timeline A doesn't depend on the features of the distribution of intrinsic values F . Regularity for timeline A 2 ≥ G(λ) g(λ) (cid:20) 2 1 + λ (cid:21) g(cid:48)(λ) g(λ) + λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. , Finding the optimal mechanism proceeds the same way as for timeline B. B.0.3 Analysis for timeline C Proof of Proposition 4, Part 1. Step 0. Assume in this preliminary step that the growth condition on v implies that x − y ≤ constv(x)p − v(y)p, where const in the following will be a non-specified positive constant number which may change from line to line and always so that the respective inequality holds. It follows then that v−1(x) − v−1(y) ≤ cxp − yp. 47This just corresponds to the derivative of ψB being non-positive. 34 This in turn implies that the functional Lp([1, ¯λ]) (cid:51) f→ (cid:90) ¯λ 1 v−1(f (s))ds (19) is continuous in the Lp-norm. The simple argument for this uses the fact that the function [0,∞) (cid:51) x→x p is Holder continuous with exponent 1 p. 1 Proof of x − y ≤ constv(x)p − v(y)p This follows simply by Taylor's expansion of order one applied to x→v(x)p and the growth condition on v. Step 1. Since the virtual type ΓC(λ) = m + (1 − λ)M is decreasing in λ, just as for the timeline B, it follows Incentive compatibility is equivalent to q(·) non-decreasing. By Mirrlees representation of the optimal payments for this situation, payments t(λ) which ensure incentive compatibility are given up to a constant by the incentive compat- ibility requirement of the decision-play self who has already decided to participate in the mechanism. We denote by U (λ) the play-decision utility in equilibrium of an incentive compatible mechanism (this is determined in the second period). It is given by U (λ) = ΓC(λ)v(q(λ)) − t(λ). The envelope theorem from the maximization problem of the agent gives U(cid:48)(λ) = −M v(q(λ)). We can use this to write U (λ) = ΓC(λ)v(q(λ)) − t(λ) = U (1) − M We solve for t(λ) to write for a constant f = −U (1) ∈ R. (cid:90) λ 1 v(q(s))ds. (cid:90) λ t(λ) = f + ΓC(λ)v(q(λ)) + M v(q(s))ds. (20) 1 Fact: t(·) is weakly decreasing in any incentive compatible mechanism. This can be easily established through taking (one-sided) derivatives. The calculation uses Assumption (S) extensively. The Fact has an important implication for the optimal mechanism whenever it exists: t(λ) ≥ 0 always in any optimal mechanism for timeline C. Proof of this implication is through contradiction. Suppose, for the sake of contradiction that there is an incentive compatible and individually rational mechanism which is profit-optimal for timeline C and so that t(λ0) < 0 for some λ0. The Fact implies that t(λ) < 0 for every λ ≥ λ0. But then the monopolist can switch to (q(λ), t(λ)) = (0, 0) for all λ ≥ λ0 (i.e. exclude all types with λ ≥ λ0). This preserves incentive compatibility and also individual rationality as the former is equivalent to q non-increasing (which remains intact) and the latter depends 35 only on the own type.48 Thus there is a threshold type λ ∈ [1, ¯λ] so that the monopolist sets (q(λ), t(λ)) = (0, 0) whenever λ > λ. Step 2. The proof of this step doesn't need the growth condition on v. Assume in this step that the threshold type λ is already given. As one can see easily, the arguments of this step hold the same for every particular value λ ∈ (1, ¯λ]. Given the t(λ) ≥ 0 - property for any optimal mechanism, at the participation stage (before the first delay), if the agent of type λ accepts the mechanism the agent experiences the following utility (see also discussion in main text): V (λ) = [(2m + (1 − λ)M ] v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)t(λ), or using the definitions from timeline B V (λ) = (1 + λ)ΓB(λ)v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)t(λ). (21) Replacing (20) into (21) we get V (λ) = (1 + λ)(cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − (1 + λ)f − (1 + λ)M (cid:90) λ 1 v(q(s))ds. It follows that the individual rationality requirement can be written as (cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − f − M (cid:90) λ 1 The objective function of the designer becomes (cid:90) λ (cid:90) λ (cid:20) t(s) − cq(s)dG(s) = f · G(λ) + 1 1 ΓC(λ)v(q(λ)) + M v(q(s))ds ≥ 0, λ ∈ [1, λ]. (cid:21) v(q(s))ds (cid:90) λ 1 − cq(s)dG(λ). (22) After the usual application of Fubini's Theorem this expression turns into f · G(λ) + ΓC(λ) + M G(λ) − G(λ) g(λ) v(q(λ)) − cq(λ) dG(λ). Thus the problem of the designer for timeline C can be rewritten as follows (cid:35) (cid:35) (cid:41) (cid:41) (cid:40)(cid:34) (cid:90) λ 1 (cid:40)(cid:34) (cid:90) λ max f∈R,s(cid:55)→q(s) f · G(λ) + 1 ΓC(λ) + M G(λ) − G(λ) g(λ) v(q(λ)) − cq(λ) s.t. (1) q(s) is non-increasing, (2) (cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) v(q(λ)) − f − M (cid:90) λ 1 v(q(s))ds ≥ 0, λ ∈ [1, λ]. dG(λ) (23) 48Thus, types outside [λ0, ¯λ] retain individual rationality under the changed mechanism and types in [λ0, ¯λ] are excluded from the mechanism and thus get their outside option of zero utility. 36 (cid:90) λ But note that by taking f in (22) into the integral49 and replacing the constraint (2) we get an upper bound for the profit. Namely, the maximum of the following integral ΓB(λ)v(q(λ)) − cq(λ)dG(λ), (24) 1 with respect to all non-increasing q. This program is easily solvable through point-wise maximization given our constraints.50 In in all we have an upper bound for the program in (8). The point-wise maximum of (24) has the following property: (!) ∞ > q(λ) > 0 whenever ΓB(λ) > 0 and q(λ) = 0 otherwise. This means the problem in (24) has a finite value. In particular, it is not optimal in (24) to set q so that lim supλ→1+ q(λ) = +∞, i.e. q is not locally unbounded near 1. That would only be profitable if the optimized value in (8) were infinity, which contradicts (!). This implies that v(q(λ)), λ ∈ [1, λ] remains bounded for any potential solution of (8). Moreover, it is easy to see from (8) and (!) that (!!) f is bounded and finite in any potential optimum. Introduce now for a given nondecreasing q(·) (cid:90) λ 1 u(λ) = f + M v(q(s))ds. (25) This results in u being continuous, non-decreasing and concave, but with free endpoint u(1) = f . Moreover, for every u non-decreasing and concave there exists a non-increasing q(·) and a f ∈ R such that u can be expressed as in (25). We make use of this equivalence considerably in what follows. Inserting (25) in (22) we get that each feasible allocation q(·) for the program (8) results in a feasible 'allocation' u(·) for the following maximization program. (cid:90) λ (cid:26) 1 ΓC(λ) u(cid:48)(λ) M max s(cid:55)→u(s) (cid:27) + u(λ) − cv−1(u(cid:48)(λ)) dG(λ) s.t. (1) u(s) is continuous, non-decreasing, concave (2) (cid:2)ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ)(cid:3) u(cid:48)(λ) − u(λ) ≥ 0, a.e. λ ∈ [1, λ]. (26) The other direction is also trivially true: whenever we have a solution u to (26) we get , t(s) = u(s) + ΓC(s) u(cid:48)(s) M for s ≤ λ and q(s) = 0, t(s) = 0 otherwise. Note that it is w.l.o.g. to ask for constraint (2) to hold a.e. This is because G is absolutely continuous w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure on [1, ¯λ]. M a solution to (23) by the relations q(s) = v−1(cid:16) u(cid:48)(s) 49f · G(λ) =(cid:82) λ M 1 f dG(λ). 50Recall that g is bounded away from zero on [1, ¯λ]. (cid:17) 37 Because of (!) and (!!) we can assume that u(cid:48)(1) and u(1) are bounded for all feasible candidates of (26). In combination with constraint (1) in (26) (continuity and concavity) this implies that we can restrict the class of u in the maximization in (26) by requiring additionally the following condition.51 (3) functions u are bounded in the Sobolev p-norm: u (cid:55)→(cid:16)(cid:82) λ 1 u(λ)pdλ +(cid:82) λ (cid:17) 1 1 u(cid:48)(λ)pdλ p by a constant c > 0. Here recall that p > 1. The constant c is chosen to be independent of λ given its boundedness and the upper and lower bounds for the optimal profit of timeline C. Moreover they are also bounded in the essential supremum-norm by a uniform bound holding for all u under consideration. Denote by C(λ) the class of functions satisfying (1), (2), (3) where (1) and (2) are only required to hold almost everywhere. Note then the easy-to-show but important facts: C(λ) is convex and bounded in the Sobolev-p norm. This follows from the linearity of the two constraints and of the Sobolev norm, as well as the requirement (3). C(λ) is closed in the Sobolev-p norm.52 To show this assume that we have a sequence un, n ≥ 1 which satisfy (1), (2), (3) and which converge in Sobolev-p norm to u. Then that (2), (3) hold true for u is easy to check: convergence in Lp implies convergence of a suitable subsequence a.e.; this implies that u is non-decreasing and concave [1, λ] which means that it is also continuous in (1, λ); (1), (2) are then automatically fulfilled; (3) is fulfilled due to the definition of convergence in the Sobolev-p norm. Since C(λ) is closed and bounded it is sequentially compact in the weak topology induced by Sobolev p-norm. This is because the space of Sobolev functions equipped with the Sobolev p-norm is reflexive and one can apply the Banach-Alaoglu Theorem which implies sequential compactness w.r.t. weak topology for all bounded, closed sets.53 The functional being maximized has the form (cid:90) λ with L(λ, u, w) = g(λ)(cid:0)ΓC(λ) w J(u) = L(λ, u(λ), u(cid:48)(λ))dλ M + u − cv−1(w)(cid:1) for (λ, u, w) coming from a bounded set 1 of R3 (determined by the above discussion) and otherwise flattens to zero continuously for all (λ, u, w) outside this bounded set. L is then a continuous function and satisfies L(λ, u, w) ≤ a(λ)w + b(λ) + cu, with some bounded functions a, b > 0. Finally, w (cid:55)→ L(λ, u, w) is strictly concave since v−1 is strictly convex. By Theorem 3.23, pg. 96 in [Dacorogna '08] it follows that J is sequential upper semi-continuous w.r.t. the weak topology. Because of upper-semicontinuity of J and compactness of the set C(λ) (all in the same topology), we know that maximizing J over C(λ) has a solution. The solution is a Sobolev function, i.e. it can be chosen to be continuous everywhere and differentiable almost everywhere. 51u(cid:48) is bounded from below by monotonicity. If it were optimal to have lim sups→1 u(cid:48)(s) = +∞ we would get a contradiction to (!) since u(cid:48)(s) = M v(q(s)). 52Note that there is a natural continuous and onto embedding ι(λ, λ(cid:48)) : C(λ(cid:48))→C(λ) whenever λ ≤ λ(cid:48). It is given by restricting the definition domain of the functions. 53See e.g. section 3.15 of [Rudin '91]. 38 Step 2. We now show how to calculate the optimal λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. For this, it suffices to show that the value function of the maximization problem (26) is continuous w.r.t. λ ∈ [1, ¯λ]. Note that [1, ¯λ] (cid:51) λ→C(λ) is a continuous, compact-valued correspondence in λ. Here we are considering all C(λ) embedded in the 'largest' space C(¯λ), all equipped with the Sobolev-p norm. Upper hemicontinuity follows by checking directly its sequential char- acterization. Lower hemicontinuity follows just as easily because of the continuous and onto embedding ι(λ, λ(cid:48)) : C(λ(cid:48))→C(λ) introduced in footnote 52. Finally, note that the objective functional in (26) is jointly continuous in (λ, u) where [1, ¯λ]×(Sobolev−p)([1, ¯λ]) is equipped with the product topology of the euclidean one and the one of the Sobolev-p norm. This follows because of the Holder inequality combined with the continuity of the map in (19). Proof of Proposition 4, part 2). This follows from the fact that ΓB(λ) − ΓC(λ) = 1+λ(m− λM ). ΓB(λ)− ΓC(λ) is zero for λ = 1 and negative for all small λ > 1. It follows 1−λ from the second constraint in (8) that f ≤ 0 in any optimal menu of contracts. If it were true that q(1) = 0 then it would follow that q ≡ 0, i.e. the profit would be zero. Thus, whenever the profit is not zero it means that for some range near λ = 1 the monopolist offers positive amounts of the good. It follows that f < 0 must hold. Proof of Theorem 1. That A is weakly better than B follows directly from the fact that the virtual valuation ΨA in timeline A is pointwise higher than the virtual valuation ΨB in timeline B and that otherwise the set of incentive compatible and individually rational mechanisms is the same for both timelines. That B is weakly better than C follows from Proposition 4. Namely, we show there during the existence proof for timeline C that: - the profit in timeline C is always bounded by the profit in timeline B, leaving out the individual rationality requirement in timeline B (proof of part 1 of Proposition 4). The optimal IC mechanism in timeline B is automatically IR. - Individual rationality in timeline C weakly costs something positive to the monopolist whenever profits in C are strictly positive (part 2) of Proposition 4). C Proofs for Section 3 Proof of Proposition 5. Straightforward algebra calculations show the formulas for (6) hold for both the case when vi(∅) is the minimum and the case when it is the maximum of vi with the definitions made in the main text. We have just split payments ti(θi,·) into the range where it is strictly positive and the range where it is negative. The positive range is multiplied by λm i . A similar split is done for the good dimension, but now it is the negative range which is multiplied by λg i . One uses Lemma 1 and algebra. The same steps can be made for the terms ωi. Proof of Proposition 6. Here we use Proposition 10 in a first step which ensures the existence of the perceived payments. 39 −i),∀θi, θ−i, θ(cid:48) The proof is finished if we show the existence of the payment schedules ti for fixed Υi-s delivered by the proof in the classical setting. Some ti-s that do the trick are the following: −i. This implies Ti(θ) = ti(θ, θ−i),∀θ, θ−i and set first ti(θi, θ−i) = ti(θi, θ(cid:48) T + i (θ) = ti(θ, θ−i)1{ti(θ,θ−i)≥0} = Ti(θ)1{Ti(θ)≥0}. Then, ωi(θ) = 0. If Υi(θ) = 0 then set Ti(θ) = 0, otherwise if Υi(θ) > 0 set Ti(θ) = Υi(θ) , while if Υi(θ) < 0 then set i µm 1+λm i Ti(θ) = Υi(θ) . Note that Ti(θ) are increasing in Υ(θi), albeit with a discontinuity at 1+µm i zero. This finishes the proof, since the Mirrlees representation also follows by the same arguments as in the classical proof with quasilinear utilities. In general, if one wants a mechanism with non-trivial ωi-s one uses Lemma 2. In timeline B, where the T + terms matter, we show in the online appendix that for optimal mechanisms it holds ωi ≡ 0. It i follows that optimal mechanisms in all of our applications below will have ti ≥ 0, so that T + i = Ti.54 Proof of Proposition 8. In the following we suppress the timeline superscript whenever the argument is valid for all timelines or it is clear from the proof context to which timeline the statements correspond. for timeline B. The proof for timeline C is similar. 1)-2) The case of timeline A is clear from the discussion in text. We show the result First note that q being symmetric we can write Qi(θ) = Q(θ) and thus Wi = W for each i. Moreover, q being monotone increasing in each θi, the same follows for Q. Indeed, we have Q(θ) = 1 − F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ). Taking W as a function of Q, i.e. W(Q) = (1 + µg)Q − ΛgQ(1 − Q) we have dW dQ = 1 + µg − Λg + 2ΛgQ. This derivative is always nonnegative for Λg ≤ 1 + µg, which establishes 1). W is nondecreasing if and only if For Λg > 1 + µg, substituting the formula for Q into the derivative above, we see that 1 2 ( 1 + µg + Λg Λg ) ≥ F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ) for all θ ∈ [θ, θ]. (27) The left hand side of (27) is smaller than 1, if the premise of 2) is fulfilled. Also the condition is more likely to be violated as c(N ) approaches θ and as F becomes more and more concentrated in lower θ-s. Note also that the upper bound on the left of (27) is smaller the higher Λg is. This establishes 2). 3) Note first the bound F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ) ≤ F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ), which is uniform in θ. We can write F ∗(N−1)(N c(N ) − θ) = P( (cid:80)N−1 i=1 θi N − 1 ≤ N c(N ) − θ N − 1 ) (cid:80)N−1 Now we only need to note that due to the Strong Law of Large Numbers 55 we know that i=1 θi N−1 has possible limit points all N−1 strictly smaller than E[F ] due to assumption. Thus we have that as N → ∞ the left hand side of (27) converges to zero uniformly in θ. converges almost surely to E[F ]. Meanwhile, N c(N ) 54For timelines A and C this is clear from Proposition 5. 55See for example chapter 2 of [Durrett '10]. 40 Proof of Theorem 2, 1). We know the rule for the optimal direct mechanism reads 'give the good to the bidder i with the highest θi, as long as θi > θ∗'. Individual rationality is realized in both timelines by setting the utility of the lowest types in equilibrium equal to zero. Recalling that in both cases the revenue in the optimal mechanism is given by (cid:90) ¯θ N(cid:88) i (θi) ≥ W B optimal allocation rules prescribe W A/B one sees that the fact W A i=1 θ W A/B i (θi)γ(θi)dF (θi), i (θi), together with the fact that in both cases the (θi) = 0, whenever θi < θ∗, the result follows. i Analysis for timeline C in the case of symmetric auctions. We assume through- out i.i.d. intrinsic types and that Λg ≤ 1. Given this, the symmetric equilibrium of any incentive compatible auction has a threshold type: sell to the highest type above a threshold. This follows from Propo- sition 6 and the fact that it is without loss of generality to look at symmetric allocation rules. The reason for the latter is the same as in classical setting (see footnote 11 in [Maskin, Riley '84]). It follows for incentive compatible allocation rules that the expected probability of getting the good when own type is s has the following form. Q(s) = F (s)n−11{s≥θ}. Given this, we can then build the perceived valuation W(s) = Q(s)(1 − Λg(1 − Q(s))), as well as define the auxiliary functions h(s) = W(s)s − (cid:90) s W(t)dt. Define furthermore θ g(s) = W(s)s + µgQ(s)s. Note that g and h depend on the threshold θ. They are both zero below θ. Moreover, both functions are weakly increasing due to IC and the assumption that Λg ≤ 1. Denote in the following by c the decision utility of the agent with the lowest type θ. Claim. An incentive compatible and individually rational mechanism in the timeline C is a tuple (θ, ω, c) s.t. (IC) c + Λmω(s) + T (s) = h(s), s ≥ θ (IR) c ≥ sm,θ(s) − λmµm 1 + λmµm Λmω(s), s ≥ θ where sm,θ(s) = h(s) − Proof of Claim. These follow directly by using Propositions 6 and 7. (IC) is immediate whereas the individual rationality requirement can be written first as 1+λmµm g(s). 1 41 g(θ) ≥ (1 + λmµm)T (θ) + Λmω(θ), s ≥ θ (28) which is then easily manipulated into (IR). Note that (IC) together with Assumption (A2) implies that Λmω(s)+T (s) is increasing in s. Thus, types with s < θ don't get served at all and pay nothing whereas types s ≥ θ may receive a (net) subsidy of c. sm,θ is a piece-wise smooth function with at most one discontinuity of uniformly bounded size across all incentive compatible mechanisms.56 Due to symmetry and the above we can rewrite the maximization problem of the designer as max c∈R,(T,ω):Θi→R×R+ (cid:90) ¯θ θ T (θ)dF (θ), s.t. (IC) and (IR) ∀θ. The objective function of the problem for timeline C is h(t)dF (t) − (c + Λmω(s))dF (s). We can split the maximization problem in two parts. Once a threshold θ has been chosen, the rest of the mechanism is found by solving (cid:90) ¯θ θ (cid:90) ¯θ θ (cid:90) ¯θ θ min c,ω(·)≥0 under the constraint (c + Λmω(s))dF (s), 1 + λmµm Λmω(s), Given any c, one can see that the optimal ω has to satisfy c ≥ sm,θ(s) − λmµm (IR) Λmω(s) = 1 + λmµm λmµm max{sm,θ(s) − c, 0}, s ≥ θ. s ≥ θ Note that payments are degenerate for all types (all-pay) if and only if c ≥ maxs sm,θ(s). Otherwise, the optimal mechanism is not all-pay and some of the types will not be fully insured in the money dimension. Overall, given a threshold type θ the rest of the mechanism is determined by solving λmµm c, c} 1 + λmµm c}dF (s)− F (θ) max{− 1 max{sm,θ(s)− 1 + λmµm c, 1 + λmµm λmµm λmµm 1 min c∈R (cid:90) ¯θ θ Note that the presence of the last term in the minimization problem will usually make for a non-smooth solution as one varies the parameter λmµm. Nevertheless, the value function of this minimization problem is a continuous function of θ.57 Denote the value function of this problem by H(θ). The optimal threshold then solves 56It is increasing in the money friction λmµm. Its difference to h disappears uniformly as λmµm→∞. 57The conditions for Berge's maximum theorem are given because c can be taken to be bounded without loss of generality, whenever λmµm comes from a bounded interval. 42 (cid:90) ¯θ θ max θ∈[θ,¯θ] h(t)dF (t) − H(θ). The maximand is a continuous function being maximized over a compact interval. There- fore there always exists a solution so that the discussion above implies that there always exists an optimal auction for timeline C. Optimal Timelines Given that timeline B is never optimal the comparison is between timelines A and C. Recall that the revenue from one auction participant in timeline A is (cid:90) ¯θ (cid:18) 1 + µg 1 + λmµm θ Q(s)s − (cid:19) (cid:90) s 0 (cid:90) 1 1 + µg 1 + λmµm θ∗ Q(t)dt dF (t) = Q(s)γ(s)ds Here, θ∗ satisfies γ(θ∗) = 0. The recipe for the optimal revenue in the case of timeline C is given in the preceding paragraph. The rest of the work for the examples is numerical analysis using the software package R. 43
1906.00296	1	1906	2019-06-01T21:34:01	The Theory of Weak Revealed Preference	[ "econ.TH", "econ.EM" ]	We offer a rationalization of the weak generalized axiom of revealed preference (WGARP) for both finite and infinite data sets of consumer choice. We call it maximin rationalization, in which each pairwise choice is associated with a "local" utility function. We develop its associated weak revealed-preference theory. We show that preference recoverability and welfare analysis \`a la Varian (1982) may not be informative enough, when the weak axiom holds, but when consumers are not utility maximizers. We clarify the reasons for this failure and provide new informative bounds for the consumer's true preferences.	econ.TH	econ	The Theory of Weak Revealed Preference∗ Victor H. Aguiar† Per Hjertstrand‡ Roberto Serrano§ This version: May 2019 Abstract We offer a rationalization of the weak generalized axiom of revealed preference (WGARP) for both finite and infinite data sets of consumer choice. We call it maximin rationalization, in which each pairwise choice is associated with a "local" utility function. We develop its associated weak revealed- preference theory. We show that preference recoverability and welfare analysis à la Varian (1982) may not be informative enough, when the weak axiom holds, but when consumers are not utility maximizers. We clarify the reasons for this failure and provide new informative bounds for the consumer's true preferences. JEL Classification: C60, D10. Keywords: consumer choice; revealed preference; rationalization; maximin rationalization; reference-dependent utility; law of demand. ∗We are grateful to Charles Gauthier for useful comments. Hjertstrand thanks Jan Wallander och Tom Hedelius stiftelse, Marcus och Marianne Wallenberg stiftelse and Johan och Jakob Söderberg stiftelse for funding. †Department of Economics, The University of Western Ontario, [email protected]. ‡Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), [email protected]. §Department of Economics, Brown University, [email protected]. 1 1. Introduction Rooted in the seminal work of Samuelson (1938), the weak (generalized) axiom of revealed preference (WGARP) has been seen as a minimal, normatively appealing, and potentially empirically robust consistency condition of choice.1 WGARP states that, for any pair of observations xt and xs, when a consumer chooses xt with xs being affordable, it must be that xt is at least as expensive when she chooses xs. While a natural condition of choice consistency, no behavioral justification for WGARP has been given. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a new notion of rationality that is equivalent to WGARP, and to develop a comprehensive revealed-preference theory based on this notion. The proposed notion brings to the forefront the concept of reference points, as a framing relevant to each pairwise comparison. Indeed, the consumer acts as if any pairwise comparison colors her preferences over all possible choices she makes. The importance of our theoretical development is that it allows us to recover preferences, and to do welfare analysis on the basis of WGARP-consistent data sets that cannot be generated by standard utility maximization. Standard utility maximization requires, in addition to WGARP-consistency, transitivity of preferences, against which there is abundant experimental and field evidence (Quah (2006)). The potential lack of robustness of the transitivity requirement on preferences motivated the seminal work of Kihlstrom et al. (1976), which essentially proposes to rewrite the entire theory of demand on the basis of WGARP alone. More recently, practitioners have recognized some difficulties surrounding the computational complexity of using standard utility maximization in setups of empirical interest (e.g., stochastic utility maximization is NP-hard to check, Kitamura and Stoye (2018)). In response, there has been a renewed interest in using WGARP as a minimalist version of the standard model of rationality, in works such as Blundell et al. (2008), Hoderlein and Stoye (2014), Cosaert and Demuynck (2018), and Cherchye et al. (2019). All these contributions are concerned with the use of WGARP to test rationality, the recovery of preferences, and the performance of welfare analysis.2 We find that a data set is consistent with WGARP if and only if it can be rationalized by a maximin preference function. We say that a data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T (a collection of prices and commodity bundles) is weakly rationalized by a preference function r : X × X → R if, for all t, r(xt, x) ≥ 0 for any x ∈ X that is affordable at prices pt (and wealth ptxt). 1Samuelson (1938) originally was interested in demand functions, and studied the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP). Following Varian (1982) we argue that it is empirically more convenient to work with demand correspondences. To accomodate this we study both WGARP and WARP but focus on the former. 2In all of them, WGARP is usually stated without indifference, because the object of interest is a demand function, not a demand correspondence. We cover both here. 2 We now define a maximin preference function. Let U be a finite index set, and ∆(U) the probability simplex on U. A reference point consists of two arbitrary price- commodity bundle pairs ((pi, xi), (pj, xj)) where i, j ∈ U. Then, uij : X 7→ R denotes a reference-dependent utility function. Note that each utility function has a double subscript, indicating the two situations in the reference point. We require that the order of such situations not matter (i.e., the reference-point pair refers to the bilateral comparison between choices i and j: uij = uji). We say that a data set is weakly rationalized by a maximin preference function if for any x, y ∈ X, we can write r(x, y) as: r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(U) min λ∈∆(U) X X i∈U j∈U λiµj(uij(x) − uij(y)). Also, fixing a situation indexed by i, consisting of the price-bundle (pi, xi), we require that for all reference points involving i ∈ U, it must be that uij(xi) ≥ uij(y) for all y ∈ X such that pixi ≥ piy. In this sense, the choice involved in the price-bundle (pi, xi) can be "rationalized" according to the reference-dependent utility functions uij for all j ∈ U. Maximin rationalization can be interpreted as an aggregation of preferences of an individual with multiple utility functions that are heterogeneous, due to reference de- pendence. If this consumer is asked to make up her mind about how to compare any pair of observations, how would she aggregate her different preferences if her behavior is consistent with WGARP? We show that this consumer has a preference function that is the maximum over the minimal difference among the local utilities of the two bundles. This consumer is cautious, in that she first looks at the smallest differences between utilities, and only then maximizes among them. Alternatively, when focusing on the bilateral comparison between bundles x and y, which can be colored by their interactions with each situation or reference point ((pi, xi), (pj, xj)), where the consumer commits to be pairwise consistent, the maximin preference function r(x, y) admits a game-theoretic interpretation. It can be interpreted as the outcome of two adversarial selves within the decision maker: (i) The former self, with a payoff function in their zero-sum game equal to uij(x)−uij(y), and choosing mixed-strategy µ ∈ ∆(U) over the choice situations; (ii) the latter self, with the negative of those payoffs, and choosing mixed-strategy λ ∈ ∆(U). This is similar to the self-equilibrium notion in Kőszegi and Rabin (2006). The adversarial self captures the idea that this consumer is aware that her preferences may change strongly but wants to remain consistent in certain pairwise situations. Whatever the interpretation, it follows that maximin rationalization implies that the preference function is bounded above (resp., below) by the maximum (resp., minimum) of differences of utilities of any two bundles over reference points. This maximin aggregation of local utilities extends a partial, reflexive, and asymmetric order (the direct revealed- 3 preference relation3 under WGARP) to a complete, reflexive, and asymmetric order on the grand-commodity set. In fact, we show that the maximin preference function is skew-symmetric, a key property of nontransitive consumers, first proposed by Shafer (1974) (i.e., r(x, y) = −r(y, x) for all x, y ∈ X). In addition, for a given x, y ∈ X, the maximin is attained at a particular reference point, meaning that the model is locally equivalent to one where the consumer maximizes a utility function. Indeed, r(x, y) = ui∗j∗(x) − ui∗j∗(y), for some i∗, j∗ ∈ U. The classical notion of rationalization by a utility function states that a data set OT can be rationalized by a utility function u : X → R if u(xt) ≥ u(x) for all x ∈ X such that x is affordable at prices pt (and wealth ptxt). Afriat (1967) and Varian (1982) show that the classical notion of rationality is equivalent to the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (GARP). In the current work, we show that a data set that satisfies WGARP, but perhaps not GARP, is consistent with a local notion of rationalization. Of course, classical utility maximization is a special case of maximin rationalization when there is a (global) utility function u that is capable of rationalizing the data set OT. In that case, r(x, y) = u(x) − u(y) for all x, y ∈ X; in other words, u = uij for all i, j ∈ U. Equipped with the equivalence between maximin rationalization and WGARP, we answer the four fundamental questions of nonparametric demand analysis posed by Varian (1982): • (i) (Consistency) When is behavior consistent with maximin rationalization? • (ii) (Recoverability/Welfare) How can we recover preferences or make welfare infer- ences on the basis of observed behavior? • (iii) (Forecasting/Counterfactuals) How can we forecast what demand will be at a new price? and • (iv) (Shape constraints) When is observed behavior consistent with maximizing a preference function that has specific shape constraints? The foregoing discussion has already sketched the answer to item (i) , and stated the equivalence between WGARP and maximin rationalization (Theorem 1). Along similar lines, we also show that the strict version of maximin rationalization is equivalent to WARP4 (Theorem 2). Next, we turn to item (ii), which we believe is one of our core contributions. We show that applying the tools developed by Varian (1982) to recover the preferences of a 3We declare a bundle x revealed preferred to y whenever x is chosen when y is affordable. 4WARP states that, for any pair of observations xt and xs, when a consumer chooses xt with xs being affordable, then, when she chooses xs, it must be that xt is more expensive. 4 consumer that satisfies WGARP, but who fails GARP, may be ineffective. Formally, the bounds provided for preferences using the toolkit in Varian (1982) for these cases may provide uninformative bounds on preferences. Thus, the revealed-preference theory for WGARP developed herein is not a corollary of the one for GARP. Specifically, we provide in Theorem 3 such new informative bounds based on the notion of maximin rationalization for data sets consistent with WGARP. Our key innovation is to consider subsets of OT, consisting of pairs of observations, where we can apply Varian's tools to recover local preferences that are combined to get bounds on the true global preferences. In addition, we clarify the reasons behind the failure of Varian's approach to recover preferences. In fact, WGARP alone cannot ensure that every possible commodity bundle x ∈ X can be supported, by some price, as the maximizer of a (maximin) preference function. Varian's approach implicitly assumes this condition, which holds only when GARP holds. In Figure 1, we observe an instance of this problem. There are three commodity bundles, depicted as budget shares, (xt for t = {1, 2, 3}, with L = 3 goods), which satisfy WGARP, but not GARP.5 Then, we consider an out-of-sample bundle (xT +1). We note that the new bundle cannot be chosen, under any price, if the consumer remains consistent with WGARP (i.e., WGARP fails in the extended data set OT ∪ {pT +1, xT +1} for all possible prices). The reason is that all bundles in OT are strictly and directly revealed preferred to xT +1. This is a consequence of xT +1 being affordable at the prices at which the original commodity bundles were chosen. Nonetheless, for every possible price, xT +1 is revealed preferred to at least one of the original commodity bundles.6 If we apply Varian's tools to this simple example, we cannot reject the hypothesis that xT +1 is the worst possible bundle in X. But that would be an absurd conclusion, since it dominates bundles such as 0. As for item (iii), the question about counterfactual bounds on demand turns out to have a simple answer. In fact, the answers for WGARP and GARP are analogous. We can build counterfactual bounds for demand consistent with WGARP with a direct modification of the approach by Varian (1982). Evidently, WGARP is a weaker condition than GARP, and provides less informative bounds to demand for a new price. At the same time, such bounds are easier to compute, and possibly more robust, in that they require only local consistency. We provide Afriat-like inequalities for WGARP that facilitate testing this condition using modern linear/integer programming techniques. These inequalities seem to be new to the literature. In contrast to item (iii), item (iv) -- i.e., the question concerning shape constraints on the preference function -- has an answer that is remarkably different from the classical work by Afriat (1967) and Varian (1982). In fact, we observe that convexity of preferences 5Each arrow represents a direct revealed-preference relation, where the commodity at the origin is directly revealed preferred to the commodity at the end of the arrow. 6The formal details of this figure are expanded in Example 1. 5 Figure 1 -- WGARP is satisfied but GARP fails is a testable shape constraint in finite data sets: there are data sets satisfying WGARP that cannot be rationalized by preference functions that are quasiconcave in the first argument. This means that these data sets cannot be rationalized by convex preferences.7 This finding provides a counterexample to Samuelson's eternal darkness, which refers to the impossibility of testing convexity of preferences in the case of utility maximization. (Incidentally, the lack of convexity of some preference functions is precisely the reason that recovering preferences can no longer use the tools in Varian (1982).) Congruent with our analysis, John (2001) provides necessary and sufficient conditions for quasiconcavity of the preference function. And following Brown and Calsamiglia 2007; Allen and Rehbeck 2018, we next focus on the study of a quasilinear restriction on the local utilities in the maximin preference function representation, and show in Theorem 4 that this restriction is associated with the law of demand. This characterization may be of interest in its own right, due to the importance of the law of demand in both theoretical and applied literatures. The direct predecessors of our work are the contributions of Kim and Richter (1986) and Quah (2006). Both works provide rationalizations of demand correspondences (or functions) consistent with WGARP (or WARP) with additional conditions on the invertibility of demand. The current work generalizes their results in two respects: (i) it provides a rationalization of WGARP/WARP for finite data sets, and (ii) for the case of infinite data sets, it relaxes a key invertibility assumption in both papers, i.e., we do not require that the set of prices at which any commodity bundle be chosen is nonempty. 7Informally, we say that preferences are convex if the set of commodities preferred to x, Ur(x), is convex. 6 This paper's findings should be helpful for practitioners of revealed preferences since, from an empirical perspective, WGARP is significantly easier to work with than Varian's GARP. In applications, it is common for practitioners to use WGARP as a synonymous of GARP. However, this is only true if price variation is limited, as shown in Cherchye et al. (2018). For example, it may happen that a finite data set of prices and observed consumption choices is consistent with WGARP, but cannot be rationalized by a utility function. If this occurs, the interpretation of the direct revealed-preference relation is unclear, yet we show that meaningful welfare analysis is possible. The plan of the paper is as follows. After the central notions of revealed-preference theory are reviewed in section 2, sections 3 to 6 deal in turn with the questions posed on items (i) to (iv) discussed above. Section 7 extends the analysis to infinite data sets. Section 8 is a brief review of related literature, and section 9 concludes. Proofs are collected in an appendix. 2. Preliminaries Suppose that a consumer chooses bundles consisting of L ≥ 2 goods in a market. We assume that we have access to a finite number of observations, denoted by T, on the prices and chosen quantities of these goods, where observations are indexed by T ={1, . . . , T}. Let xt ∈ X ≡ RL+ \ {0} denote the bundle of goods at time t ∈ T, which was bought at prices pt ∈ P ≡ RL++. We impose Walras' law throughout: wealth at time t is equivalent to ptxt ∈ W ≡ R++, for all t ∈ T.8 We write OT = {pt, xt}t∈T to denote all price-quantity observations, and refer to OT as the data. In practice, the data OT describe a single consumer that is observed over time. 2.1. Revealed-Preference Axioms We begin by recalling some key definitions in the revealed-preference literature. Definition 1. (Direct revealed preferred relations) We say that xt is directly revealed preferred to xs, written xt (cid:23)R,D xs, when ptxt ≥ ptxs. Also, xt is strictly and directly revealed preferred to xs, written xt (cid:31)R,D xs, when ptxt > ptxs. If xt is directly revealed preferred to xs, this means that the consumer chose xt and not xs, when both bundles were affordable. If xt is strictly and directly revealed preferred to 8We use the following notation: The inner product of two vectors x, y ∈ RL is defined as xy =PL l=1 xlyl. For all (x, y) ∈ RL, x (cid:61) y if xi ≥ yi for all i = 1, . . . , L; x ≥ y if x (cid:61) y and x 6= y; and x > y if xi > yi for all i = 1, . . . , L. We denote RL+ = {x ∈ RL : x (cid:61) (0, . . . , 0)} and RL++ = {x ∈ RL : x > (0, . . . , 0)}. 7 xs, then she could also have saved money by choosing xs. These definitions only compare pairs of bundles. We can extend them to compare any subset of bundles by using the transitive closure of the direct relation: Definition 2. (Revealed preferred relations) We say that xt is revealed preferred to xs, written xt (cid:23)R xs, when there is a chain (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ T with x1 = xt and xn = xs such that x1 (cid:23)R,D x2 (cid:23)R,D . . . (cid:23)R,D xn. Also, xt is strictly revealed preferred to xs, written xt (cid:31)R xs, when at least one of the directly revealed relations in the revealed preferred chain is strict. Hence, the revealed preferred relation (cid:23)R is the transitive closure of the direct revealed- preference relation (cid:23)R,D. Next, we use these binary relations to define axioms that characterize different types of rational consumer behavior. We begin with Samuelson's (1938) weak axiom of revealed preference: Axiom 1. (WARP) The weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP) holds if there is no pair of observations s, t ∈ T such that xt (cid:23)R,D xs, and xs (cid:23)R,D xt, with xt 6= xs. Kihlstrom et al. (1976) introduces a generalized version of WARP:9 Axiom 2. (WGARP) The weak generalized axiom of revealed preference (WGARP) holds if there is no pair of observations s, t ∈ T such that xt (cid:23)R,D xs, and xs (cid:31)R,D xt. Samuelson (1948) shows how WARP can be used to construct a set of indifference curves in the two-dimensional (L = 2) case, but also recognizes that WARP is not enough to characterize rationality in the multi-dimensional (L > 2) case. Responding to this challenge, Houthakker (1950) introduces the strong axiom of revealed preference (SARP), which makes use of transitive comparisons between bundles as implied by the revealed preferred relation: Axiom 3. (SARP) The strong axiom of revealed preference (SARP) holds if there is no pair of observations s, t ∈ T such that xt (cid:23)R xs, and xs (cid:23)R,D xt, with xt 6= xs. Varian (1982) notes that SARP requires single-valued demand functions, and argues that it is empirically more convenient to work with demand correspondences and "flat" indifference curves. To accomodate these properties, Varian introduces the generalized axiom of revealed preference (GARP): Axiom 4. (GARP) The generalized axiom of revealed preference (GARP) holds if there is no pair of observations s, t ∈ T such that xt (cid:23)R xs and xs (cid:31)R,D xt. 9In contrast to only observing a finite number of prices and quantities, suppose that we knew the entire demand function. In this case, Kihlstrom et al. (1976) shows that if the demand function is differentiable and satisfies WGARP at every point in its domain, then the Slutsky substitution matrix derived from the demand function is negative semidefinite at every point. 8 In the two-dimensional (L = 2) case, the following equivalences are known: Theorem A. (Equivalence of axioms) Let L = 2. Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T: • The data OT satisfies SARP if and only if OT satisfies WARP (Rose 1958). • The data OT satisfies GARP if and only if OT satisfies WGARP (Banerjee and Murphy 2006). 2.2. Revealed-Preference Characterizations In this section, we recall the main results from the revealed-preference literature that are needed in order to introduce our contribution. Consider the following definitions of rationalization:10 Definition 3. (Utility rationalization) Consider a data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T and a utility function u : X 7→ R. For all x ∈ X and all t ∈ T such that ptx ≤ ptxt, • the data OT is weakly rationalized by u if u(xt) ≥ u(x). • the data OT is strictly rationalized by u if u(xt) > u(x) whenever x 6= xt. Afriat's (1967) fundamental theorem is well known: Theorem B. (Afriat's theorem, Varian 1982) Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated utility function. (ii) The data OT satisfies GARP. (iii) There exist numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T such that the Afriat inequalities: U t − U s ≥ λtpt(xt − xs), hold for all s, t ∈ T. 10We say that a utility function u : X 7→ R is: (i) continuous if for any sequence (xn) for n ∈ N+ such that xn ∈ X and limn→∞ xn = x with x ∈ X implies limn→∞ u(xn) = u(x); (ii) locally nonsatiated if for any x ∈ X and for any > 0, there exists y ∈ B(x, ) where B(x, ) = {z ∈ X : z − x ≤ } such that u(y) > u(x); (iii) strictly incresing if for x, y ∈ X, x ≥ y implies u(x) > u(y); and (iv) concave if for any x, y ∈ X, we have u(x) − u(y) ≥ ξ (y − x), for ξ ∈ ∂u(y), where ∂u(y) is the subdifferential of u. 9 (iv) There exist numbers V t for all t ∈ T such that the Varian inequalities: if pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then, V t − V s ≥ 0, if pt(xt − xs) > 0 then, V t − V s > 0, hold for all s, t ∈ T. (v) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, and concave utility function. There are several interesting features of Afriat's theorem.11 Statements (ii), (iii), and (iv) give testable conditions that are easy to implement in practice (See, e.g., Demuynck and Hjertstrand 2019). Perhaps the most interesting theoretical implication of Afriat's theorem is that statements (i) and (v) are equivalent, which means that continuity, monotonicity, and concavity are nontestable properties. In other words, separate violations of any of these properties cannot be detected in finite data sets. Varian (1982) shows that the numbers U t and λt in statement (iii) can be interpreted as measures of the utility level and marginal utility level of income at observation t ∈ T. Analogously, Demuynck and Hjertstrand (2019) shows that the numbers V t in statement (iv) can be interpreted as measures of the utility levels at the observed demands. Matzkin and Richter (1991) provides an analogous result for strict rationalization, by showing that SARP is a necessary and sufficient condition for a data set OT to be strictly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, and strictly concave utility function: Theorem C. (Matzkin and Richter 1991) Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be strictly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated utility function. (ii) The data OT satisfies SARP. (iii) There exist numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T such that the inequalities 6= xs then, U t − U s > λtpt(cid:16) if xt if xt = xs then, U t − U s = 0, xt − xs(cid:17) , hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iv) There exist numbers V t for all t ∈ T such that the inequalities: if xt 6= xs and pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then, V t − V s > 0, 11Statements (i), (ii), (iii), and (v) comprise Varian's (1982) original formulation of Afriat's theorem. Statement (iv) is rather new to the revealed preference literature. See Demuynck and Hjertstrand (2019) for a motivation and intuition of the Varian inequalities in statement (iv). 10 if xt = xs then, V t − V s = 0, hold for all s, t ∈ T. (v) The data OT can be strictly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing and strictly concave utility function. Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem mirrors Afriat's, in the sense that it shows that continuity, monotonicity, and strict concavity are nontestable properties.12 Although much is known about the types of consumer behavior that characterize finite data sets satisfying SARP and GARP, there are no analogous characterizations for WARP and WGARP. The current paper, starting with the next section, fills this gap. 3. Characterizations of WGARP and WARP In this section, we provide revealed-preference characterizations, analogous to the ones in Afriat's and Matzkin and Richter's theorems, for WGARP and WARP. We begin by introducing the maximin preference model, which, to the best of our knowledge, is a new model of consumer behavior. 3.1. The Maximin Preference Model We start with some preliminaries. Definition 4. (Preference function) A preference function is a mapping r : X × X → R, that maps ordered pairs of commodity bundles to real numbers. A preference function is a numerical representation of a consumer's preferences. If r(x, y) ≥ 0 then the consumer prefers bundle x to y. Similarly, if r(x, y) > 0, we say that x is strictly preferred to y. In what follows, we focus on a particular representation of r, namely the maximin model. Let U be a finite index set that enumerates a collection of reference points. We define a reference point as a pair of observations, consisting of two price vectors and the corresponding vectors of commodity bundles ((pi, xi), (pj, xj)) ∈ (P × X)2 for i, j ∈ U. We consider a collection of reference-dependent utility functions uij : X → R, with the property that if pixi ≥ (>)piy for all y ∈ X, then it must be the case that 12Matzkin and Richter's (1991) original formulation consists of statements (i), (ii), (iii), and (v). Talla Nobibon et al. (2016) proves the equivalence of statements (ii) and (iv). 11 uij(xi) ≥ (>)uij(y), for all i, j ∈ U. We assume that the reference-dependent utility functions are independent of permutations of the indices in the subscript, so that uij = uji for all i, j ∈ U. Let ∆(U) be the probability simplex defined on U. Definition 5. (Maximin (strict) preference model) We say that the preference function r(x, y) is a maximin (strict) preference function if, for any x, y ∈ X, it can be written as: X X i∈U j∈U r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(U) min λ∈∆(U) λiµj(uij(x) − uij(y)), where, for any reference point indexed by i, j ∈ U, the 'local' utility function, uij, is continuous, strictly increasing, and (strictly) concave. The maximin preference function assigns a numerical value to the comparison of any pair of commodity bundles x, y ∈ X, by aggregating over local preferences that are defined for any reference point in the set U. More specifically, the aggregation is a maximin function, which in the first dimension takes the maximal difference between the utility gains of x over y, and in the second dimension, takes the minimal value of that difference, over the different 'local' utility functions. The maximin aggregation structure is appealing because the preference function effectively extends the incomplete direct revealed preference relation when it is asymmetric (i.e., when WGARP holds) to the commodity space X. As such, this representation provides us with an interpretation of the direct revealed preference relation when rationality -- GARP -- fails, but WGARP is satisfied. For any reference point indexed by i, j ∈ U, the local utility function, uij, is continuous, strictly increasing, and (strictly) concave. Moreover, the maximin is achieved at a particular reference point. Thus, for any pairwise comparison, a consumer behaves as if they are rational. However, note from the definition of uij that, for any distinct pairwise comparison that is not a permutation, the preferences may change, in which case, preferences are not stable across all observations. In the maximin (strict) preference model, a consumer still behaves locally "as if she were rational" in that behavior according to this model rules out binary inconsistencies. More precisely, we show that a data set OT satisfies (WARP) WGARP if and only if the maximin (strict) preference model (strictly) rationalizes the data. As a special case, when all local utility functions are the same, i.e., uij = u for all i, j ∈ U, the maximin preference model reduces to standard utility maximization. Then, r(x, y) = u(x) − u(y) for all x, y ∈ X. As such, traditional utility maximization is a case of global rationality, as opposed to the new notion of local rationality introduced here. Next, we present some properties of the preference function. We begin with a property that turns out to be key in our characterizations of WARP and WGARP: Definition 6. (Skew-symmetry) We say that a preference function r : X × X 7→ R is skew-symmetric if r(x, y) = −r(y, x) for all x, y ∈ X. 12 Skew-symmetry means that the preference function r induces a preference order on X that is complete and asymmetric. Note that, when a data OT satisfies WGARP, then the direct preference relation is an (incomplete) asymmetric relation on X, the preference function r extends it if it is a maximin function. We have the following result: Lemma 1. If r is a maximin preference function, then for any x, y ∈ X, we have: X X i∈U X X j∈U i∈U j∈U λiµj(uij(x) − uij(y)) λiµj(uij(x) − uij(y)), r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(U) = min λ∈∆(U) min λ∈∆(U) max µ∈∆(U) and moreover, r is skew-symmetric. The proof of this lemma is omitted, as it follows directly from the classical von Neumann's minimax theorem. It is easy to see that the maximin preference function is skew-symmetric, making this model a variant of the general nontransitive consumer model, considered in Shafer (1974). The next definition lists some additional important properties of preference functions, which will connect with the maximin preference model in the following section: Definition 7. Consider a preference function r : X × X → R. We say that: (i) r is continuous if for all y ∈ X and any sequence {xn} of elements in X that converges to x ∈ X it must be that limn→∞ r (xn, y) = r (x, y).13 (ii) r is locally nonsatiated if for any x, y ∈ X such that r (x, y) = 0 and for any > 0, there exists a y0 ∈ B(y, ) such that r (x, y0) < 0. (iii) r is strictly increasing if for all x, y, z ∈ X, x ≥ z implies r(x, y) > r(z, y). (cid:16) (iv) r is quasiconcave if for all x, y, z ∈ X and any 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1 we have r min{r (x, y) , r (z, y)}, where xλ = λx + (1 − λ) z, and strictly quasiconcave if, for any 0 < λ < 1, the inequality is strict whenever x 6= z. (v) r is concave if for all x, y, z ∈ X and any 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1 we have r xλ, y (1 − λ) r (z, y), and strictly concave if, for any 0 < λ < 1, the inequality is strict whenever x 6= z. xλ, y (cid:17) ≥ (cid:17) ≥ λr (x, y) + (cid:16) (vi) r is piecewise concave if there is a sequence of concave functions in the first argument ft (x, y) for t ∈ K in a compact set such that r (x, y) = maxt∈K {ft (x, y)}, and strictly piecewise concave if there is a similar sequence of strictly concave functions. 13We state the weaker versions of these properties, as all we need is to work with movements in one of the arguments. 13 Some remarks are in order: Continuity is a technical condition that is convenient to ensure existence of a maximum in the constrained maximization of the preference function. Local nonsatiation rules out thick indifference curves: if we take an arbitrarily small neighborhood of a bundle that is indifferent to a given bundle x, the neighborhood contains bundles that are dominated by x. Strict monotonicity simply means that "more is better". Quasiconcavity says that for a fixed reference point y ∈ X, a mixture of two bundles x, z ∈ X is at least as good as the worst of the two bundles, according to the preference function. Concavity is a cardinal version of quasiconcavity. Quasiconcavity and concavity are important properties because they ensure well-behaved optimization problems. More precisely, quasiconcavity guarantees that a function defined on a compact set has a convex set of maxima points, while a strictly concave function defined on a compact set always has a unique global maximum. Piecewise concavity and its strict version are new properties, which turn out to be especially important for our characterizations of WGARP/WARP.14 The property says that for a fixed y ∈ X, a mixture of two bundles x, z ∈ X is at least as good as the worst one of the two bundles, but only if x, z are close enough. In other words, this is a local version of concavity, implying local quasiconcavity. 3.2. Preference Function Rationalization We now introduce the notion of (strict) rationalization by a preference function, which is analogous to utility rationalization in Definition 3: Definition 8. (Preference function rationalization) Consider a data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T and a preference function r : X × X 7→ R. For all x ∈ X and all t ∈ T such that ptx ≤ ptxt, • the data OT is weakly rationalized by r if r(xt, x) ≥ 0. • the data OT is strictly rationalized by r if r(xt, x) > 0 whenever x 6= xt. The next definition introduces the concept of rationalization in terms of the maximin preference model: Definition 9. (Maximin preference rationalization) The data OT is weakly (strictly) rationalized by a maximin (strict maximin) preference function r if r is a maximin (strict maximin) preference function as stated in Definition 5, and OT is weakly (strictly) rationalized by r as stated in Definition 8. In the subsequent two sections, we show that WGARP (WARP) is a necessary and sufficient condition for a data set OT to be rationalized by the maximin (strict maximin) preference model. 14See Zangwill (1967) for a detailed discussion of piecewise concave functions. 14 3.3. WGARP The next theorem provides a revealed-preference characterization of WGARP for finite data sets. This result mirrors Afriat's theorem in terms of preference function rationalization (as opposed to utility rationalization): Theorem 1. Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and skew-symmetric preference function. (ii) The data OT satisfies WGARP. (iii) There exist numbers Rt,s and λt such that inequalities: ts > 0 for all s, t ∈ T with Rt,s = −Rs,t and λt Rt,s ≥ λt tspt(xt − xs), ts = λt st hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iv) There exist numbers W t,s for all s, t ∈ T with W t,s = −W s,t such that inequalities: if pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then, W t,s ≥ 0, if pt(xt − xs) > 0 then, W t,s > 0, hold for all s, t ∈ T. (v) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a maximin preference function. (vi) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, piecewise concave, and skew-symmetric preference function. The equivalence of statements (i) and (vi) shows that, if the data can be weakly rationalized by any nontrivial preference function at all, it can, in fact, be weakly rationalized by a preference function that satisfies continuity, monotonicity, and piecewise concavity. Put differently, separate violations of these three properties cannot be detected in finite data sets. The numbers Rt,s and λt st in statement (iii) have a similar interpretation as in Afriat's theorem for each reference point; that is, if we consider t, s ∈ T, then Rt,s is a measure of the utility difference uts(xt) − uts(xs) for that particular pairwise data set, while λt st is a measure of the marginal utility level of income at observation t ∈ T for the pairwise data set. 15 3.4. WARP The next theorem provides a revealed-preference characterization of WARP for finite data sets, and mirrors Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem: Theorem 2. Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be strictly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and skew-symmetric preference function. (ii) The data OT satisfies WARP. (iii) There exist numbers Rt,s and λt ts > 0 for all s, t ∈ T with Rt,s = −Rs,t and λt ts = λt st such that inequalities: 6= xs then, Rt,s > λt if xt if xt = xs then, Rt,s = 0, tspt(cid:16) xt − xs(cid:17) , hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iv) There exist numbers W t,s for all s, t ∈ T with W t,s = −W s,t such that inequalities: 6= xs and pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then, W t,s > 0, if xt if xt = xs then, W t,s = 0, hold for all s, t ∈ T. (v) The data OT can be strictly rationalized by a maximin strict preference function. (vi) The data OT can be strictly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, piecewise strictly concave, and skew-symmetric preference function. Analogous to Theorem 1, this result shows that separate violations of continuity, monotonicity, and strict piecewise concavity cannot be detected in finite data sets. 4. Recoverability of Preferences In this section, we tackle the question of when one can use the direct revealed-preference relation elicited from the observed consumer behavior in order to make inferences about her true preferences. We begin by showing that recovering preferences using WGARP 16 does not follow as a trivial corollary of the original approach proposed by Varian (1982). We next propose an alternative method to recover bounds of preferences using WGARP. 4.1. Varian's Approach to Recover Bounds on Preferences Using WGARP At this point, it is useful to briefly recall the classical approach from Varian (1982), which finds upper and lower bounds to the true preferences of a consumer. The object of interest is the true preference of the consumer, captured by the strict upper contour set of a commodity bundle x according to the true preference function r: Definition 10. (Set of strictly better alternatives) We define the set of strictly better alternatives than a (possibly unobserved) commodity bundle x ∈ X as: Ur(x) = {y ∈ X : r(y, x) > 0}, for the true preference function r. Varian (1982) defines the supporting set of prices for any new commodity bundle x ∈ X so that the extended data set, OT ∪ {p, x}, satisfies GARP as: S(x) = {p ∈ P : OT ∪ {p, x} satisfies GARP}. Varian then uses the set S(x) to create upper and lower bounds for the set of interest Ur(x). We need to define two new sets. The revealed worse set is OT ∪{(p,x)} y} RW(x) = {y ∈ X : ∀p ∈ S(x), x (cid:31)R,D for (cid:31)R,D, defined on the extended data set OT ∪ {(p, x)}. The nonrevealed worse set N RW(x) is the complement of RW(x). The revealed preferred set is OT ∪{(p,y)} x}. RP(x) = {y ∈ X : ∀p ∈ S(y), y (cid:31)R,D Varian (1982) shows that, in the case of utility maximization (i.e., r(x, y) = u(x) − u(y)), for some u : X → R and all x, y ∈ X) we have: RP(x) ⊆ Ur(x) ⊆ N RW(x). One would be tempted to use the same construction for WGARP by replacing the definition of the supporting set S(x) with one where the extended data set satisfies WGARP. Of course, when the data consists of two goods (i.e., L = 2), this does not cause any problems since, in such a case, WGARP and GARP are equivalent (See Theorem A). However, if L > 2, as we show, performing such an exercise is generally not advisable. In particular, 17 we illustrate this by means of an example that, in some cases, yields an uninformative upper bound set N RW(x). We begin the elaboration of these points by using an example in Keiding and Tvede (2013): Example 1. (Keiding and Tvede 2013, Example 1, p.467) Consider a data set O3 with prices p1 = (4 1 5)0, p2 = (5 4 1)0, p3 = (1 5 4)0, and bundles x1 = (4 1 1)0, x2 = (1 4 1)0, x3 = (1 1 4)0. It is easy to verify that this data set satisfies WGARP. The objective is to recover the preferences of this consumer for a new commodity bundle, xT +1, given this observed behavior. Suppose that the unobserved commodity bundle is: xT +1 = 1 3(x1 + x2 + x3) = (2 2 2)0. If the analyst were to use the methods in Varian (1982), she would need to recover all prices pT +1 for which the extended data set O3 ∪ (pT +1, xT +1) satisfies WGARP. In this extended data set, we have pt(xt − xT +1) = 2 > 0, for all t = 1, 2, 3. However, there is no p ∈ P for which p(xT +1 − xt) < 0, for all t = 1, 2, 3. This implies that this extended data set fails WGARP. This presents a problem, if we want to recover preferences using Varian's (1982) approach, because it implicitly assumes that the analyst can always find at least one such vector of prices. In this example, Varian's supporting set is empty, i.e., S(xT +1) = ∅. Moreover, it directly follows that any monotonically dominated bundle such as x− = (1 1 1) cannot be ruled out from the set Ur(x). Consequently, the upper bound of Ur(xT +1) is uninformative, i.e., N RW(xT +1) = X \ xT +1. Thus, any analysis based on this approach is problematic, since the data set O3 can be rationalized by a preference function that is strictly increasing (in the first argument). In other words, Varian's method to bound preferences does not yield any valuable information in this example. Yet the method proposed by Varian (1982) to recover preferences for GARP is often useful. Our analysis simply says that recoverability of preferences in terms of WGARP does not follow as a trivial corollary of Varian's results. We can also clarify the source of this failure. Consider Example 1 again, and note that the original data satisfies WGARP, which implies that there is a preference function r that rationalizes the data. Moreover, we have that r(x1, x2) > 0, r(x2, x3) > 0, and r(x3, x1) > 0. In addition, we know that the new bundle, xT +1, is a convex combination of the observed bundles. Given the equivalence between GARP and convexity of preferences, if we followed Varian's approach then we would be implicitly assuming that preferences are convex. But, in our case, convexity of preferences is implied by the assumption that the preference function is quasiconcave in its first argument, in which case, we must have r(xT +1, xT +1) = 0 ≥ mint=1,2,3{r(xt, xT +1)}. This implies that xT +1 must be revealed to be weakly better than at least one of the three observed bundles x1, x2, and x3. However, note that, for all t = 1, 2, 3, we have 18 pt(xt − xT +1) = 2 > 0. This implies that, if the consumer is maximizing a quasiconcave preference function, then all observed commodity bundles must be strictly preferred to the new bundle, i.e., r(xt, xT +1) > 0 for all t = 1, 2, 3. Hence, the extended data set O3 ∪ {p, xT +1} cannot be weakly rationalized by a quasiconcave and skew-symmetric preference function. Interestingly, this example also shows that quasiconcavity of the preference function is, in fact, a testable property in finite data sets. As such, this is also a counterexample to Samuelson's eternal darkness conjecture, that any finite data set always can be rationalized by a convex preference relation. Summarizing these results, the lack of convexity of preferences, which can be inferred from behavior consistent with WGARP, limits the applicability of the tools developed in the classical treatment by Varian (1982). In section 6.1, we will return to the study of the testable implications of convexity. 4.2. A New Approach to Recover Bounds on Preferences Using WGARP In this subsection, we use the new notion of maximin preference rationalization as a way to provide new informative bounds of the true preferences. We show that these new bounds escape the problems associated with Varian's approach. We have shown, in the proof of Theorem 1, that, without loss of generality, we can identify the index set of reference point situations U with the set of observations T, so that we have a local true utility us,t for all s, t ∈ T, in which case the true global preferences for any x0, x ∈ X are given by: r(x0, x) = max µ∈∆(T) min λ∈∆(T) t∈T s∈T X X λsµt(ust(x0) − ust(x)). We have also shown that any data set OT satisfying WGARP can be broken into T 2 st = {(pt, xt), (ps, xs)}, and have argued that each one of these data pairwise data sets O2 sets satisfies GARP. Define the 'local' (Varian) support set as Sst(x) for any x ∈ X. For a data set of T observations, note that we have a collection of T 2 such 'local' support sets, and that everyone of these sets is never empty: Definition 11. (WGARP-robust revealed preferred set) For each s, t ∈ T let RPst(x) = {y ∈ X : ∀p ∈ Sst(y), py > px} be the pairwise revealed preferred set. We define the (WGARP-)robust revealed preferred set as: RP W(x) = ∪s∈T ∩t∈T RPst(x). Next, we argue that the robust revealed preferred set is a lower bound of Ur(x) for all x ∈ X. If x0 ∈ RP W(x), this implies that x0 ∈ RPst(x) for all t ∈ T and for some 19 P s∗ ∈ T. Thus, it must be the case that, for s∗ and for all t ∈ T, us∗t(x0) > us∗t(x). This means that r(x0, x) ≥ minµ t µt(us∗t(x0) − us∗t(x)) > 0. Hence, we can conclude that, if x0 ∈ RP W(x), then r(x0, x) > 0, which is the same as saying that RP W(x) ⊆ Ur(x). Definition 12. (WGARP-robust (non)revealed worse set) For each s, t ∈ T, let RWst(x) = {y ∈ X : ∀p ∈ Sst(x), px > py} be the pairwise revealed worse set. Let N RWst(x) be the complement of RWst(x). We define the (WGARP-)robust nonrevealed worse set as N RW W(x) = ∩s∈T ∪t∈T N RWst(x). From this definition, it directly follows that, if r(x0, x) > 0, then x0 ∈ N RW W(x). To see this, note that, if r(x0, x) > 0, then there must be some t∗ ∈ T such that ust∗(x0) > ust∗(x) for all s ∈ T. This implies, by Varian 1982, that x0 ∈ N RWst∗(x) for all s ∈ T. By Definition 12, we must have that x0 ∈ N RW W(x). Hence, we can conclude that Ur(x) ⊆ N RW W(x). The following theorem summarizes these results, confirming that the bounds recovered using Varian's approach in this context are not sharp: Theorem 3. The upper contour set of the true preferences at any given x ∈ X is: RP W(x) ⊆ Ur(x) ⊆ N RW W(x). Moreover, (i) the upper bound, N RW(x), recovered using Varian's approach is not sharp, i.e., N RW W(x) ⊆ N RW(x) for all x ∈ X (with strict containment for some x ∈ X); and (ii) the lower bound, RP(x), recovered using Varian's approach is not sharp, i.e., RP(x) ⊆ RP W(x) for all x ∈ X (with strict containment for some x ∈ X). We note that, in the context of Example 1, N RW W(xT +1) does not contain the dominated commodity x− = (1 1 1). In fact, N RW W(xT +1) excludes all commodity bundles that are monotonically dominated by xT +1, which is a desirable property, lacking in Varian's analogous set N RW(xT +1) = X \ xT +1. Similar statements can be made about the RP W(x−) set. Theorem 3 has some important implications. The first part shows that the new method of using subsets of data sets for bound computation yields informative bounds. The second part highlights that a naive application of the methodology in Varian (1982), when the assumption of convex preferences does not hold, is problematic. 20 5. Demand Counterfactuals In this section, we show how to perform counterfactual analysis. That is, for a new (possibly unobserved) price vector pT +1 we propose a simple method to provide a bound for the demanded bundle under WGARP. This method is a simplification of the procedure for the same purpose under GARP, proposed by Varian (1982). Definition 13. (W-Demand Set) We define the W-demand set, or the set of all commodity bundles compatible with WGARP, by D(pT +1) = {x ∈ X : OT ∪ {pT +1, x} satisfies WGARP and pT +1x = 1}. The W-demand set for a new price-vector can be formulated as a linear program by making use of the following result: Corollary 1. The bundle xT +1 ∈ X is in D(pT +1) if and only if it satisfies: (i) pT +1xT +1 = 1, (ii) ptxT +1 ≥ ptxt, for all t ∈ T, for which pT +1xt ≤ pT +1xT +1, (iii) ptxT +1 > ptxt, for all t ∈ T, for which pT +1xt < pT +1xT +1. The first condition is a normalization of wealth and imposes Walras' law. The second condition imposes the restriction that, if the observed bundles are cheaper than the new bundle at the new prices, then the new bundle cannot be affordable at the observed prices. The third condition strengthens the second, for the case of a strict inequality. Note that, if the new bundle is cheaper at the new prices than the observed bundles, then the second and third conditions are redundant as WGARP is trivially satisfied for the extended data set. Recently, Adams (2019) highlights some technical difficulties in the construction of the W-demand set, when predictions are made at more than a single price regime. For that case, Adams (2019) proposes a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problem, which can be simplified for the case of WGARP using the results in Theorem 1. In particular, the inequalities in statement (iv) of Theorem 1 are useful for this purpose. Cherchye et al. (2015) shows how the Varian inequalities in statement (iv) in Theorem B can be formulated as a MILP problem. This MILP problem can be modified in a straightforward way to check whether the inequalities in statement (iv) in Theorem 1 have a solution. Specifically, it follows from Theorem 4 in Cherchye et al. (2015) that statement (iv) in our Theorem 1 holds if and only if there exist numbers Rt,s ∈ (−1, 1), with Rt,s = −Rs,t, and binary variables Bt,s ∈ {0, 1} such that, for all observations s, t ∈ T, the following linear inequalities (in p and x) hold: Rt,s < Bt,s, 21 (Bt,s − 1) ≤ Rt,s, pt(xt − xs) < Bt,sAt, (Bt,s − 1)As ≤ ps(xt − xs). As a final remark, in contrast to recoverability of preferences for data sets consistent with WGARP, the construction of demand counterfactuals is just a simplification of the procedure outlined in Varian (1982). The main reason is that the construction of the W-demand set does not depend on duality arguments, which fail when quasiconcavity of the preference function does not hold. 6. Shape Constraints: Concave Rationalization and the Law of Demand We have shown, in sections 3.3 and 3.4, that WGARP (WARP) is a necessary and sufficient condition for a data set to be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, skew-symmetric, and piecewise (strictly) concave preference function. In this section, we consider conditions that are necessary and sufficient for a data set to be rationalized under stronger shape restrictions. 6.1. Concave Rationalization John (2001) provides conditions under which a data set can be weakly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, skew-symmetric, and concave preference function: Theorem D. (John 2001) Consider a data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated, concave, and skew-symmetric preference function. (ii) There exist numbers Rt,s and λt > 0 for all s, t ∈ T with Rt,s = −Rs,t such that the inequalities: Rt,s ≥ λtpt(xt − xs), hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iii) The data OT can be weakly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, and skew-symmetric preference function. 22 John (2001) provides additional testable conditions, which he shows are equivalent to condition (ii). By comparing John's (2001) results with our Theorem 1, it is easy to see that his results imply any of the conditions in our theorem, but not vice versa. In particular, note that, in contrast to statement (iii) in Theorem 1, the indices λt are constant across all pairs s, t ∈ T. This ensures that John's rationalizing preference function is indeed concave. Of course, by Afriat's theorem and the equivalence between WGARP and GARP (See Theorem A), concavity is a nontestable property when L = 2. However, by Theorem 1 and Theorem D, when L > 2, concavity is a testable property. This raises the question of whether it is at all possible to further strenghthen the results in Theorem 1, by showing that WGARP is equivalent to weak rationalization by means of a quasiconcave preference function. However, from the discussion in section 4.1, Example 1 shows that this is not the case. In fact, this is a counterexample showing that the data cannot be rationalized by a quasiconcave preference function. Thus, with a finite number of observations, Example 1 shows that quasiconcavity is a testable property. 6.2. The Law of Demand and Quasilinear Preference Functions This subsection derives necessary and sufficient conditions for a data set to be ratio- nalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, skew-symmetric, concave, and quasilinear preference function. Interestingly, we show that one such condition is the law of demand, and consequently, this is equivalent to rationalization by a maximin quasilinear prefer- ence function. Before presenting these results, we briefly recall the revealed-preference characterization for quasilinear-utility maximization. 6.2.a. The Quasilinear Utility Maximization Model. -- First, we consider the definition of quasilinear utility maximization: Definition 14. (Quasilinear utility maximization) Consider a locally nonsatiated utility function u(x). We say that a consumer facing prices p ∈ P and income w ∈ W is a quasilinear utility maximizer if she solves max x∈X u(x) + w − px ⇐⇒ max x∈X,y∈R u(x) + y s.t. px + y ≤ w. As in standard applications of quasilinear utility maximization, we allow the numeraire y to be negative in order to avoid technicalities related to corner solutions.15 Consider the following definition of quasilinear utility rationalization for a finite data set OT: 15Allen and Rehbeck (2018) shows the equivalence of the unconstrained quasilinear maximization and the constrained version with a numeraire in Definition 14. 23 Definition 15. (Quasilinear utility rationalization) Consider a data set OT and a utility function u : X → R. For all x ∈ X, the data OT is rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and quasilinear utility function u if, for all t ∈ T: u(xt) − ptxt ≥ u(x) − ptx. Brown and Calsamiglia (2007) shows that the axiom of the strong law of demand is a necessary and sufficient condition for a data set to be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, and quasilinear utility function.16 Axiom 5. (Strong law of demand) The strong law of demand holds if, for all distinct choices of indices (1, 2, 3, . . . , n) ∈ T: p1(x1 − x2) + p2(x2 − x3) + ··· + pn(xn − x1) ≤ 0. The next theorem recalls the revealed-preference characterization of quasilinear utility maximization from Brown and Calsamiglia (2007) and Allen and Rehbeck (2018): Theorem E. (Brown and Calsamiglia 2007; Allen and Rehbeck 2018) Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and quasilinear utility function. (ii) The data OT satisfies the strong law of demand. (iii) There exist numbers U t for all t ∈ T such that the inequalities: U t − U s ≥ pt(xt − xs), hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iv) The data OT can be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, and quasilinear utility function. 6.2.b. The Law of Demand and the Quasilinear Preference Function Maximization Model. -- In this subsection, we provide analogous results for the quasilinear preference function model, and show that the law of demand is a necessary and sufficient condition for a data set to be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, skew-symmetric, and quasilinear preference function. The axiom of the law of demand is formally defined as: 16Brown and Calsamiglia (2007) refers to the strong law of demand as cyclical monotonicity, while Geanakoplos (2013) calls it additive GARP (AGARP). 24 Axiom 6. (Law of demand) The law of demand holds if, for all observations s, t ∈ T: (pt − ps)(xt − xs) ≤ 0. For any sequence consisting of only two (distinct) observations s, t ∈ T, it is easy to see that the strong law of demand and the law of demand are equivalent. Thus, in a sense, for the quasilinear model, the relation between the law of demand and the strong law of demand mirrors the relation between WGARP (WARP) and GARP (SARP). Before stating our revealed-preference characterization of the law of demand, we introduce the maximin quasilinear preference function, which is a particular representation of a quasilinear preference function: Definition 16. (Maximin quasilinear preference model) We say that the preference func- tion r(x, y) is a maximin quasilinear preference function if, for any x, y ∈ X, it can be written as: r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(U) min λ∈∆(U) i∈U j∈U X X λiµj(uij(x) − uij(y)), where, for any reference point indexed by i, j ∈ U, the 'local' utility function ui,j is continuous, strictly increasing, concave, and quasilinear. The next two definitions detail the notion of rationalization, in terms of the quasilinear preference function, and in the specific case of the maximin quasilinear preference function model: Definition 17. (Quasilinear preference function rationalization) Consider a data set OT and a preference function r : X × X → R. For all x ∈ X and all t ∈ T, the data OT is rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and quasilinear preference function r if r(xt, x) − pt(xt − x) ≥ 0. Definition 18 (Maximin quasilinear preference rationalization). The data OT is rational- ized by a maximin quasilinear preference function r if r is a maximin quasilinear preference function as stated in Definition 16, and OT is rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and quasilinear preference function r as stated in Definition 17. The next theorem provides a revealed-preference characterization of the law of demand for finite data sets: Theorem 4. Consider a finite data set OT = {pt, xt}t∈T. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data OT can be rationalized by a locally nonsatiated, skew-symmetric, and quasilinear preference function. 25 (ii) The data OT satisfies the law of demand. (iii) There exist numbers Rt,s, for all s, t ∈ T, with Rt,s = −Rs,t, such that inequalities: Rt,s ≥ pt(xt − xs), hold for all s, t ∈ T. (iv) The data OT can be rationalized by a maximin quasilinear preference function. (v) The data OT can be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, skew- symmetric, and quasilinear preference function. 7. Infinite Data Sets: Characterizations of WGARP, WARP and the Law of Demand Thus far, our results have been derived under the assumption that the researcher only observes a finite number of choices. In the original formulation of revealed-preference theory, Samuelson (1938) and Houthakker (1950) implicitly assume that the entire demand function, or a demand correspondence, is observed. In this section, we show that our main results from the previous sections can be transported to the case of infinite data sets, namely, when we observe a demand correspondence x : P × W → 2X \ ∅, where w ∈ W ≡ R++ denotes wealth. We focus on compact sets of prices and consumption bundles, where, by abusing notation slightly, we denote P ⊂ RL++ and X ⊂ RL+ \ 0, as the sets of prices and consumption bundles, respectively. We continue to assume Walras' law, so that x ∈ x(p, w), px = w. We define the image of x as X = ∪p∈P,w∈Wx(p, w). A central assumption throughout this section is that we can write the demand correspondence as a data set consisting of an infinite number of demand observations, which we denote by O∞ = {p, x}p∈P,x∈X:x∈x(p,px). 7.1. WGARP and WARP We begin by providing revealed-preference characterizations for WGARP and WARP. In doing so, we define the direct preference relations for infinite data sets as: Definition 19. (Direct Revealed Preferences) We say that x ∈ X is directly revealed preferred to y ∈ X, written x (cid:23)R,D y, when px ≥ py such that x ∈ x(p, px). Also, x ∈ X is directly revealed preferred to y ∈ X, written x (cid:31)R,D y when px > py and x ∈ x(p, px). 26 Under this definition, the data O∞ satisfies WGARP if there is no pair x, y ∈ X such that x (cid:23)R,D y and y (cid:31)R,D x. Analogously, the data O∞ satisfies WARP if there is no pair x, y ∈ X such that x (cid:23)R,D y and y (cid:23)R,D x. We begin by generalizing the maximin rational preference function to the case of infinite data sets. For this, we need some preliminaries. For any reference point in the data set O∞, we rearrange the observations into a vector o = (p0 a0 q0 b0)0 ∈ O2, with O ⊆ P × X and x ∈ x(p, px), such that each reference point can be thought as a column vector. In addition, we define o1 = (p0 a0)0 and o2 = (q0 b0)0, such that o = (o0 We assume that the set of reference points O is compact, i.e., closed and bounded. There are several examples satisfying this condition; for instance, when there are a finite number of reference points, or when the demand correspondence that generates the data set is compact-valued. Hence, in the latter case, compactness of O follows from assuming that x(p, px) is a compact set, which ensures that the entire set P × X is compact.17 We consider a reference-dependent utility function, u• : O2 × X → R, that rationalizes 2)0 ∈ O2 and for all y ∈ X, if px ≥ (>)py, then the data. That is, for every pair o = (o0 it must be the case that uo(x) ≥ (>)uo(y). We further assume that u• is continuous, or more precisely, that it is continuous at the reference point for every commodity bundle. Moreover, we assume that the reference-dependent utility functions are independent of permutations, so that uo1o2 = uo2o1 for all o1, o2 ∈ O. Let Σ denote a Borel σ-algebra defined on O, and let ∆(O, Σ) denote the simplex of Borel probability measures defined on O (We write ∆(O) = ∆(O, Σ)).18 The next definition introduces the generalized maximin preference function: 1 o0 2)0. 1 o0 Definition 20. (Generalized Maximin (strict) preference model) We say that the preference function r(x, y) is a generalized maximin (strict) preference function if, for any x, y ∈ X, it can be written as: Z Z r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O (uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y))dλ(o1)dµ(o2), where, for any reference point o ∈ O2, the 'local' utility function, uo(·), is continuous, strictly increasing, and (strictly) concave. The next result shows that the generalized maximin preference function r is skew- symmetric: 17Note that compact-valuedness of the demand correspondence graph is a very general assumption and holds for the case of continuous preferences maximized over linear budget sets when the sets of prices and wealth are compact. 18The set ∆(O, Σ) is endowed with the usual weak∗ topology. Specifically, since O is a metrizable space, the topology is endowed with the Prokhorov metric. Also note that ∆(O, Σ) is a compact metric space, because O is assumed to be a compact metric space. This follows from Alaoglu's theorem (See e.g., Dunford and Schwartz 1958, p.424, Theorem V.4.2). 27 Lemma 2. If r is a generalized maximin preference function, then for any x, y ∈ X, we have: Z Z Z Z (uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y))dλ(o1)dµ(o2) (uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y))dλ(o1)dµ(o2), r(x, y) = min λ∈∆(O) = max µ∈∆(O) max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O o1∈O o2∈O and moreover, r is skew-symmetric. The first part of Lemma 2 follows from the continuous version of Von-Neumann's minimax theorem in Glicksberg (1950), and by the definition of u• that guarantees that it is a continuous mapping.19 In this framework, we define the concept of rationalization as follows: Definition 21. (Preference function rationalization) Consider an infinite data set O∞ and a preference function r : X × X 7→ R. For all x, y ∈ X such that py ≤ (<)px, • the data O∞ is weakly rationalized by r if r(x, y) ≥ 0. • the data O∞ is strictly rationalized by r if r(x, y) > 0 whenever x 6= y. Definition 22. (Maximin preference rationalization) The data O∞ is weakly (strictly) rationalized by a maximin (strict maximin) preference function r if r is a maximin (strict maximin) preference function as stated in Definition 20, and O∞ is weakly (strictly) rationalized by r as stated in Definition 21. The next theorem shows that WGARP (WARP) is a necessary and sufficient condition for an infinite data set to be rationalized by a maximin (strict) preference function: Theorem 5. Consider an infinite data set O∞. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data O∞ can be (strictly) weakly rationalized by a locally nonsatiated and skew-symmetric preference function. (ii) The data O∞ satisfies (WARP) WGARP. (iii) The data O∞ can be (strictly) weakly rationalized by a generalized maximin preference function. (iv) The data O∞ can be (strictly) weakly rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, (strictly) piecewise concave, and skew-symmetric preference function. 19Note that we can always construct a continuous u•, if we build the utilities associated with each reference point following Varian (1982). We extend this technical point in the proof of the main theorem of this section. 28 Some remarks are pertinent: First, if the data O∞ satisfies WARP, then it must hold for any observation (p, x) ∈ O∞ that x = x(p, px), in which case the demand correspondence is actually a demand function. Hence, in the weak sense, Theorem 5 rationalizes demand correspondences satisfying WGARP, and in the strict sense, it rationalizes demand functions satisfying WARP. Second, Theorem 5 generalizes the results in Kim and Richter (1986) and Quah (2006). Specifically, the key assumption in these papers is that the demand correspondence satisfies an invertibility condition, i.e., that for every commodity bundle x ∈ X, there exists a price p ∈ P at which x is demanded (with wealth px). In contrast, the results in Theorem 5 are not based on any such invertibility condition. Hence, our results are derived under weaker assumptions than in Kim and Richter (1986) and Quah (2006). Note that the invertibility condition is violated in our motivating example (Example 1). Third, as discussed above, our main assumption is that the graph of the demand correspondence is compact. Note that, for the case of demand functions, this is trivially true. For demand correspondences, maximizing a continuous preference function on compact sets of prices and wealth, implies, by Berge's maximum theorem, that the correspondence is compact-valued. Consequently, this assumption is indeed a very weak condition.20 Finally, we have not explicitly assumed homogeneity of degree zero. In fact, homo- geneity can be imposed, since it is implied by maximin rationalization, and as such, we can normalize wealth to 1 without loss of generality. 7.2. Law of Demand This subsection is devoted to a characterization of the law of demand for infinite data sets, defined as: Definition 23. (Law of demand) The law of demand holds if, for all x, y ∈ X: (p − q)(x − y) ≤ 0, such that x ∈ x(p, px) and y ∈ x(q, qy). Under this definition, with the notation and assumptions from the previous subsection, we define the generalized maximin quasilinear preference function as follows: Definition 24. We say that the preference function r(x, y) is a generalized maximin 20We note that the compactness condition can be relaxed to some degree if we substitute the min and max operators by supremum and infimum. However, this will result in some additional technicalities that are not of any practical interest. 29 quasilinear preference function if, for any x, y ∈ X, it can be written as: Z Z (uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y))dλ(o1)dµ(o2), r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O where, for any reference point o ∈ O2, the 'local' utility function, uo(·), is continuous, strictly increasing, concave, and quasilinear. The following definitions introduce the concept of rationalization: Definition 25. (Preference function rationalization) Consider an infinite data set O∞, and a preference function r : X × X 7→ R. For all x, y ∈ X: r(x, y) − p(x − y) ≥ 0. Definition 26. (Maximin quasilinear preference rationalization) The data O∞ is rational- ized by a maximin quasilinear preference function r if r is a maximin quasilinear preference function as stated in Definition 24, and O∞ is rationalized by r as stated in Definition 25. The next theorem shows that the law of demand is a necessary and sufficient condition for an infinite data set to be rationalized by a maximin quasilinear preference function: Theorem 6. Consider an infinite data set O∞. The following statements are equivalent: (i) The data O∞ can be rationalized by a locally nonsatiated, skew-symmetric, and quasilinear preference function. (ii) The data O∞ satisfies the law of demand. (iii) The data O∞ can be rationalized by a generalized maximin quasilinear preference function. (iv) The data O∞ can be rationalized by a continuous, strictly increasing, concave, skew-symmetric, and quasilinear preference function. 8. Related Literature In this section, we extend our discussion of the relation of our findings with previous works. As already stated, the closest works to our contribution are Kim and Richter (1986) and Quah (2006). Both works provide rationalizations of demand correspondences, or functions, consistent with WGARP or WARP, using additional conditions on the 30 invertibility of demand, with preferences that are convex (in a certain sense).21 Our work generalizes those contributions by (i) providing a rationalization of WGARP/WARP for finite data sets, and (ii) relaxing the requirement that for every commodity bundle in X, there is a price in its supporting set (i.e., the set of prices at which the commodity bundle is chosen is nonempty) for the case of infinite data sets. As we have seen in Example 1, there are commodities with an empty supporting set. This is equivalent to a failure of invertibility of the demand correspondence or function. Instead, our work imposes a weak technical condition, namely, compactness of the graph of the demand correspondence. Under this condition, we show that WGARP is equivalent to maximin rationalization, namely, the infinite data set can be rationalized by a continuous, skew-symmetric, strictly increasing, and piecewise concave preference function. To the best of our knowledge, this result is new in the revealed-preference literature, and in the classical demand analysis. The notion of preference functions is not new. Preference functions with the skew- symmetry property were introduced by Shafer (1974). We have shown that rationalization by skew-symmetric preferences is essentially equivalent to WGARP. Moreover, we have also shown that WGARP is equivalent to rationalization by a new kind of preference function, the maximin preference function. Our results provide a comprehensive answer to the conjecture posed in Kihlstrom, Mas-Colell, and Sonnenschein (1976), concerning the equivalence between Shafer's skew-symmetric preference functions and WGARP. Krauss (1985) provides a representation of 2-monotone operators (effectively equivalent to the law of demand), by means of a skew-symmetric preference function. To our knowledge, our results regarding WGARP are new in the mathematical literature on monotone operators as well, extending the contribution of Krauss (1985) to 2-cyclical consistent operators (effectively equivalent to WGARP). We also provide an extension for the original representation of the law of demand, connecting it with maximin quasilinear rationality, as in Brown and Calsamiglia (2007), as well as covering the case of limited data sets. 9. Conclusion This paper has provided a new notion of rationalization, the maximin preference function, which is equivalent to Samuelson's WGARP. It has built a comprehensive theory of (weak) revealed preference on the basis of this notion. 21The notions of convexity of preferences in Kim-Richter and Quah are implied by convexity of preferences but convexity is not implied by their restrictions. 31 References Adams, A. (2019). Mutually consistent revealed preference bounds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2019. Afriat, S. N. (1967). The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. Interna- tional Economic Review, 8(1):67 -- 77. Allen, R. and Rehbeck, J. (2018). Assessing Misspecification and Aggregation for Struc- tured Preferences. Unpublished working paper. Banerjee, S. and Murphy, J. (2006). A simplified test for preference rationality of two- commodity choice. Experimental Economics, 9(1):67 -- 75. Blundell, R., Browning, M., and Crawford, I. (2008). Best Nonparametric Bounds on Demand Responses. Econometrica, 76(6):1227 -- 1262. Brown, D. and Calsamiglia, C. (2007). The nonparametric approach to applied welfare analysis. Economic Theory, 31(1):183 -- 188. Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2018). Transitivity of preferences: when does it matter? Theoretical Economics, 13(3):1043 -- 1076. Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2019). Bounding counterfactual demand with unobserved heterogeneity and endogenous expenditures. Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming. Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., and Hjertstrand, P. (2015). Revealed preference tests for weak separability: An integer programming approach. Journal of Econometrics, 186(1):129 -- 141. Cosaert, S. and Demuynck, T. (2018). Nonparametric welfare and demand analysis with unobserved individual heterogeneity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2):349 -- 361. Demuynck, T. and Hjertstrand, P. (2019). Samuelson's approach to revealed preference theory: Some recent advances. In Anderson, R., Barnett, W., and Cord, R., editors, Paul Samuelson: Master of Modern Economics. Palgrave MacMillan, London. Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T. (1958). Linear operators part I: General theory, volume 7. Interscience publishers New York. Geanakoplos, J. D. (2013). Afriat from maxmin. Economic Theory, 54(3):443 -- 448. 32 Glicksberg, I. L. (1950). Minimax theorem for upper and lower semi-continuous payoffs. Rand Corporation. Hoderlein, S. and Stoye, J. (2014). Revealed preferences in a heterogeneous population. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(2):197 -- 213. Houthakker, H. (1950). Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica, 17(66):159 -- 174. John, R. (2001). The concave nontransitive consumer. Journal of Global Optimization, 20(3-4):297 -- 308. Keiding, H. and Tvede, M. (2013). Revealed smooth nontransitive preferences. Economic Theory, 54(3):463 -- 484. Kihlstrom, R., Mas-Colell, A., and Sonnenschein, H. (1976). The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Econometrica, 44(5):971 -- 978. Kim, T. and Richter, M. K. (1986). Nontransitive-nontotal consumer theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(2):324 -- 363. Kitamura, Y. and Stoye, J. (2018). Nonparametric analysis of random utility models. Econometrica, 86(6):1883 -- 1909. Kőszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4):1133 -- 1165. Krauss, E. (1985). A representation of arbitrary maximal monotone operators via sub- gradients of skew-symmetric saddle functions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 9(12):1381 -- 1399. Matzkin, R. L. and Richter, M. K. (1991). Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 53(2):287 -- 303. Moore, J. (1999). Mathematical Methods for Economic Theory 2. Springer. Quah, J. K. (2006). Weak axiomatic demand theory. Economic Theory, 29(3):677 -- 699. Rose, H. (1958). Consistency of preference: The two-commodity case. Review of Economic Studies, 25(2):124 -- 125. Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica, 5(17):61 -- 71. Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15(60):243 -- 253. 33 Shafer, W. J. (1974). The nontransitive consumer. Econometrica, 42(5):913 -- 919. Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., Crama, Y., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., and Spieksma, F. (2016). Revealed preference tests of collectively rational consumption behavior: Formulations and algorithms. Operations Research, 64(6):1197 -- 1216. Varian, H. R. (1982). The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50(4):945 -- 973. Zangwill, W. (1967). The piecewise concave function. Management Science, 13(11):900 -- 912. 34 Appendix Proofs of Section 3: Characterizations of WGARP and WARP Proof of Theorem 1 (i) =⇒ (ii). -- Let r(x, y) be skew-symmetric utility function that weakly rationalizes the data. Suppose there is a violation of WGARP, so that ptxt ≥ ptxs and psxs > psxt for some pair of observations s, t ∈ T. Then by weak rationalization in Definition 8 we have r(xt, xs) ≥ 0. Suppose first that r(xs, xt) > 0. But this results in a contradiction, since by skew-symmetry −r(xs, xt) = r(xt, xs), which implies r(xt, xs) ≥ 0 > −r(xs, xt) = r(xt, xs). Suppose next that r(xs, xt) = 0. But then by local nonsatiation there exists y ∈ B(xt, ) for some small > 0 such that psxs > psy with r(xs, y) < 0, which contradicts that r weakly rationalizes the data. Thus, there cannot exist a locally nonsatiated function r(xs, xt) = 0 such that psxs > psxt. (ii) =⇒ (v). -- Suppose that WGARP in condition (ii) holds. For every pair of observations st denote the data set consisting of the two observations s, t ∈ T. in the data set OT, we let O2 Overall, we have T 2 such data sets, which exhausts all possible pairwise comparisons in OT. For the two observations in every data set O2 st, we define the Afriat function ust : X → R as in Afriat's theorem (See e.g., Varian 1982). From Afriat's theorem we know that ust is continuous, concave and strictly increasing. Next, for all x, y ∈ X, we define the mapping: rst : X × X → R as:  ust (x) − ust (y) pt (x − y) if s 6= t, if s = t. rst (x, y) = Clearly, rst is continuous in x and y, concave in x and convex in y (since ust is continuous and concave). Moreover, it is skew-symmetric since rst(y, x) = ust(y)− ust(x) = −rst(x, y). Notice that since the function rst is constructed for every (s, t)− pair of observations in OT we have a collection of T 2 functions rst. Let the T − 1 dimensional simplex be denoted as ∆ = {λ ∈ RT+PT t=1 λt = 1}. Define the preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: X X X X s∈T r(x, y) = min λ∈∆ = max µ∈∆ max µ∈∆ min λ∈∆ t∈T s∈T t∈T λsµtrst(x, y) λsµtrst(x, y). We prove that the function r weakly rationalizes the data set OT. Consider y ∈ X and some fixed t ∈ T such that ptxt ≥ pty. Let µt ∈ ∆ be the T − 1 simplex such that µt j = 0 35 if j 6= t and µt j = 1 if j = t. Then we have: X X X X r(xt, y) = max µ∈∆ ≥ min λ∈∆ = min λ∈∆ min λ∈∆ i∈T s∈T i∈T X t∈T λiµt j∈T λirit(xt, y). λsµtrst(xt, y) jrij(xt, y) It suffices to show that rit(xt, y) ≥ 0 whenever ptxt ≥ pty for each data set O2 follows directly from the definition of rit and Afriat's theorem. Hence, r(x, y) ≥ 0. (v) =⇒ (vi) . -- Here, we verify that the preference function r constructed in condition (v) is skew-symmetric, continuous, strictly increasing and piecewise concave (in x and also piecewise convex in y). First, we show skew-symmetry. We have: it. But this −r(x, y) = − min λ∈∆ = max λ∈∆ min µ∈∆ max µ∈∆ X X λsµtrst(x, y) X X t∈T λsµt(−rst(x, y)), s∈T Since rst is skew-symmetric (i.e., −rst(x, y) = rst(y, x)), we have (using Lemma 1): s∈T t∈T X X X s∈T s∈T X X X t∈T t∈T s∈T t∈T λsµt(−rst(x, y)) λsµtrst(y, x) λsµtrst(y, x) −r(x, y) = max λ∈∆ = max λ∈∆ = min µ∈∆ min µ∈∆ min µ∈∆ max λ∈∆ = r(y, x), which proves that r is skew-symmetric. Second, we show that r is continuous. The simplex ∆ consists of a finite number of elements and is therefore compact. Moreover, from above, we know that rst is continuous. Hence, for any λ, µ ∈ ∆, the function f(x, y; λ, µ) =X X s∈T t∈T λsµtrst(x, y), is continuous. By a direct application of Berge's maximum theorem (e.g., Moore 1999, p.280) it follows that r(x, y) = minλ∈∆ maxµ∈∆ f(x, y; λ, µ) is a continuous function of x, y ∈ X. Third, we show that r is strictly increasing. Consider any x, y, z ∈ X such that x > y. 36 Then: rst(x, z) = ust(x) − ust(z) > ust(y) − ust(z) = rst(y, z), where ust(x) > ust(y) follows by Afriat's theorem. This implies: X X s∈T t∈T max µ∈∆ X X s∈T t∈T λsµtrst(x, z) > max µ∈∆ λsµtrst(y, z), for all λ ∈ ∆. Thus, r(x, z) > r(y, z). s∈TP Fourth, we show that r is piecewise concave in its first argument (and piecewise convex in its second argument). Consider any x ∈ X and a fixed z ∈ X. The function rst(x, z) = ust(x) − ust(z) is concave in x since ust(x) is concave by Afriat's theorem function fz(x; λ, µ) =P and the difference between a concave function and a constant is concave. Moreover, the t∈T λsµtrst(x, z) is concave for any λ, µ ∈ ∆, since the linear combination of concave functions is concave. Since concavity is preserved under the pointwise minimum operator, it follows that the function gz(x; λ) = minµ∈∆ fz(x; λ, µ) is concave in the first argument for all λ ∈ ∆. Thus, by Definition 7 the function hz(x) = maxλ∈∆ gz(x; λ) is piecewise concave. By skew-symmetry the mapping r is piecewise convex in the second argument. This completes the proof. (vi) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Suppose that WGARP holds. Consider once again the data set O2 ts, and recall that we have T 2 such data sets, which exhausts all possible pairwise comparisons in the data set OT. Obviously, for the two observations in each data set O2 ts, WGARP is equivalent to GARP. By a direct application of Afriat's theorem, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) the data set O2 ts and ts − U l tspk(xk − xl) hold ts > 0 for all k ∈ {t, s} such that the Afriat inequalities: U k λk for all k, l ∈ {t, s}. Now, notice that the two data sets O2 ts and O2 st contain the same two bundles and that permuting the data is insignificant for Afriat's theorem. Thus, st for all k ∈ {t, s}. By defining without loss of generality, we can set U k Rt,s = U t (iii) =⇒ (iv). -- Suppose that condition (iii) holds. Since λt ts > 0, if pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then Rt,s ≥ 0, and if pt(xt − xs) > 0 then Rt,s > 0. Define W t,s = Rt,s for all s, t ∈ T and the proof follows. (iv) =⇒ (ii). -- Suppose that the inequalities in condition (iv) holds, but that WGARP is violated, i.e., pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 and ps(xs − xt) > 0 for some s, t ∈ T. Then W t,s ≥ 0 and W s,t > 0. Thus, W t,s + W s,t > 0, which violates the inequalities in condition (iv). st satisfies WGARP, (ii) there exist numbers U k ts, we get the inequalities in condition (iii). ts and Rs,t = U s ts = U k st and λk ts = λk ts − U s ts ≥ λk ts − U t 37 Remarks. -- The numbers W t,s in condition (iv) can be constructed directly from WGARP by considering the following simple proof that condition (ii) implies (iv). Suppose that WGARP holds. For all s, t ∈ T set W t,s = pt(xt − xs) − ps(xs − xt). We verify that this construction works. First, notice that W s,t = ps(xs − xt) − pt(xt − xs). Thus, W t,s + W s,t = 0 since: W t,s + W s,t = (pt(xt − xs) − ps(xs − xt)) + (ps(xs − xt) − pt(xt − xs)) = pt(xt − xs) − pt(xt − xs) − ps(xs − xt) + ps(xs − xt) = 0. Second, notice that if pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then ps(xs − xt) ≤ 0, otherwise we would have a violation of WGARP. Thus, W t,s = pt(xt − xs) − ps(xs − xt) ≥ 0. Also, if pt(xt − xs) > 0 then W t,s = pt(xt − xs) − ps(xs − xt) > 0. Proof of Theorem 2 (i) =⇒ (ii). -- Let r(x, y) be skew-symmetric utility function that strictly rationalizes the data. Suppose there is a violation of WARP, so that ptxt ≥ ptxs and psxs ≥ psxt with xs 6= xt for some pair of observations s, t ∈ T. Then, by strict rationalization in Definition 8, we have r(xt, xs) > 0 and r(xs, xt) > 0. But this violates skew-symmetry. (ii) =⇒ (v). -- Since this proof is very similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we only give the main parts (and the parts that differ). Suppose that WARP in condition (ii) holds. For all s, t ∈ T, we let the data set O2 consist of the two observations s, t ∈ T. Overall, this gives T 2 such data sets. For the st, we define the function ust : X → R as in Matzkin two observations in each data set O2 and Richter's (1991) theorem. From this, we know that each function ust is continuous, strictly concave and strictly increasing. Next, for all x, y ∈ X, we define the mapping: rst : X × X → R as: st  ust (x) − ust (y) rst (x, y) = pt (x − y) − ε(g(x − xt) − g(y − xt)), if s 6= t, if s = t. for some small ε > 0 and where the function g is defined in Matzkin and Richter (1991). Clearly, each function rs,t is continuous, strictly concave and skew-symmetric. Define the preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: r(x, y) = min λ∈∆ = max µ∈∆ max µ∈∆ min λ∈∆ λsµtrst(x, y) λsµtrst(x, y). X X s∈T X X t∈T s∈T t∈T 38 We prove that the function r strictly rationalizes the data set OT. Consider y ∈ X and some fixed t ∈ T such that xt 6= y and ptxt ≥ pty. Let µt ∈ ∆ be the T − 1 simplex such j = 1 if j = t. By the same argument as in the proof of Theorem that µt 1, we have j = 0 if j 6= t and µt X X X i∈T i∈T r(xt, y) ≥ min λ∈∆ = min λ∈∆ λiµt jrij(xt, y) j∈T λirit(xt, y). It suffices to show that rit(xt, y) > 0 whenever xt 6= y and ptxt ≥ pty for each data set it. But this follows directly from the definition of rit and Matzkin and Richter's (1991) O2 theorem. Hence, r(x, y) > 0. (v) =⇒ (vi). -- We verify that the preference function r constructed in condition (v) is skew-symmetric, continuous, strictly increasing and piecewise strictly concave in x (and piecewise strictly convex in y). s∈TP By the exact same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1, it can be shown that the function r(x, y) is skew-symmetric, continuous and strictly increasing. Thus, it suffices to show that it is piecewise strictly concave in x (and piecewise strictly convex in y). Consider any x ∈ X and a fixed z ∈ X. The function rst(x, z) = ust(x) − ust(z) is strictly concave in x since ust(x) is strictly concave and ust(z) can be treated as a constant. Since the function fz(x; λ, µ) =P the linear combination of strictly concave functions is strictly concave, it follows that t∈T λsµtrst(x, z) is strictly concave for any λ, µ ∈ ∆. It then follows that the function gz(x; λ) = minµ∈∆ fz(x; λ, µ) is strictly concave in the first argument for all λ ∈ ∆. Hence, the function hz(x) = maxλ∈∆ gz(x; λ) is piecewise strictly concave. By skew-symmetry the mapping r is piecewise strictly convex in y. (vi) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Suppose that WARP holds. Consider the T 2 data sets O2 ts for every pair of observations s, t ∈ T. By a direct application of Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) the data set O2 st satisfies WARP, xk − xl(cid:17), and if xk = xl then, U k ts > 0 for all k ∈ {t, s} such that the inequalities: (ii) there exist numbers U k if xk 6= xl then, U k ts − U l ts = 0 hold for all k, l ∈ {t, s}. Since permuting the data is insignificant for Matzkin and Richter's (1991) st for all k ∈ {t, s}. We theorem, we can without loss of generality set U k st and λk ts − U t obtain the inequalities in condition (iii) by defining Rt,s = U t ts and Rs,t = U s ts. (iii) =⇒ (iv). -- Suppose that condition (iii) holds. If x 6= xt and pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 then Rt,s > 0. We obtain condition (iv) by defining W t,s = Rt,s for all s, t ∈ T. ts = λk ts − U s tspk(cid:16) ts and λk ts = U k ts − U l ts > λk 39 (iv) =⇒ (ii). -- Suppose that the inequalities in condition (iv) holds, but that WARP is violated, i.e., pt(xt − xs) ≥ 0 and ps(xs − xt) ≥ 0 with xt 6= xs for some s, t ∈ T. Then W t,s > 0 and W s,t > 0. Thus, W t,s + W s,t > 0, which violates the inequalities in condition (iv). Proofs of Section 4: Recoverability of Preferences Proof of Theorem 3 The proof of the first part of the theorem follows from the discussion in Section 4.2. Next, we provide a simple proof of the second part. Since RWst(x) ⊇ RW(x), we have that N RWst(x) ⊆ N RW(x). Thus, by construction, this implies N RW W(x) ⊆ N RW(x). We are going to show that N RW w(x) ⊂ N RW(x) for some x ∈ X. Consider Example 1. Clearly, the bundle x− = (1, 1, 1) is monotonically dominated by xT +1. First, note that the upper bound using the naive approach contains this dominated option x− ∈ N RW(x) = X \ xT +1. Second, note that for all s, t ∈ T and by strictly monotonicity, we must have ust(xT +1) > ust(x−) (this follows by Afriat's theorem applied to the data set O2 st). This implies that x− /∈ N RWst(xT +1) for all t, s ∈ T. It also follows that RP(w) ⊆ RP W(x), since we know that that RP(x) ⊆ RPst(x), for all s, t ∈ T. Consider again, in the context of Example 1, the bundle x− = (1, 1, 1). We are going to show that xT +1 = (2, 2, 2) is not in RP(x−), but that it is in RP W(x−). From the example, we know that S(xT +1) = ∅, which implies xT +1 /∈ RP(x−). However, we know that p(xT +1− x−) > 0 for all p ∈ P, which means that for the local utility that rationalizes st, we have ust(xT +1) > ust(x−) for all s, t ∈ T. This means that xT +1 ∈ RPst(x−) for O2 all s, t ∈ T. Hence, xT +1 ∈ RP W(x−). Proofs of Section 6: Shape Constraints: Concave Rationalization and the Law of Demand Proof of Theorem E (i) =⇒ (ii). -- By the definition of rationalization in Definition 15, we have for any observation s ∈ T with x = xs, u(xt) − ptxt ≥ u(xs) − ptxs. 40 Thus, after rearranging terms, for any sequence of distinct choices of indices (1, 2, 3, ..., n) ∈ T, we have: p1x2 − p1x1 ≥ u(x2) − u(x1), p2x3 − p2x2 ≥ u(x3) − u(x2), ... pnx1 − pnxn ≥ u(x1) − u(xn). Adding up both sides, we get: (p1x2 − p1x1) + (p2x3 − p2x2) + ··· + (pnx1 − pnxn) ≥ (u(x2) − u(x1)) + (u(x3) − u(x2)) + ··· + (u(x1) − u(xn)) = 0. Thus, p1(x1 − x2) + p2(x2 − x3) + ··· + pn(xn − x1) ≤ 0, which is the strong law of demand. (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Suppose that condition (ii) holds and define: U t = {1,2,3,...,n,t}∈T{p1(x2 − x1) + p2(x3 − x2) + ··· + pn(xt − xn)}, min for all t ∈ T. That is, U t is a minimum of the given expression over all sequences starting anywhere and terminating at t. Note that there are only finitely many sequences because their elements are distinct. Hence, the minimum always exists. To show that the numbers U t do satisfy the inequalities in statement (iii), suppose that: U t = p1(x2 − x1) + p2(x3 − x2) + ··· + pn(xt − xn), U s = pa(xb − xa) + pb(xc − xb) + ··· + pm(xs − xm), for some distinct sequences {1, 2, 3, ...n, t} ∈ T and {a, b, c, ..., m, s} ∈ T. Then: U t = p1(x2 − x1) + p2(x3 − x2) + ··· + pn(xt − xn) ≤ pa(xb − xa) + pb(xc − xb) + ··· + pm(xs − xm) + ps(xt − xs) = U s + ps(xt − xs), 41 since the value on the left-hand side of the inequality is a minimum over all paths to t. Hence, U t ≤ U s + ps(xt − xs), for all s, t ∈ T, which are the inequalities in statement (iii). (iii) =⇒ (iv). -- Suppose that condition (iii) holds. For all x ∈ X, define the function: u(x) = min s∈T {U s + ps(x − xs)} Since u is defined as the lower envelope of a set of linear functions, it is continuous, strictly increasing and concave. Moreover, it is easy to show that u(xt) = U t for all t ∈ T. Finally, for all x ∈ X and all t ∈ T: u(x) − ptx = min s∈T {U s + ps(x − xs)} − ptx ≤ U t + pt(x − xt) − ptx = U t − ptxt = u(xt) − ptxt. Thus, u weakly rationalizes the data set OT. (iv) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. Proof of Theorem 4 (i) =⇒ (ii). -- If the data set OT can be rationalized by a skew-symmetric and quasilinear preference function, then for all t ∈ T and all x ∈ X, r(xt, x) ≥ pt(xt − x). In particular, it must be that for x = xs, r(xt, xs) ≥ pt(xt − xs). Analogously, we have r(xs, xt) ≥ ps(xs − xt) for all s, t ∈ T. Adding these inequalities, and by skew-symmetry, we have: 0 = r(xt, xs) + r(xs, xt) ≥ pt(xt − xs) + ps(xs − xt). Rearranging terms, we get: (pt − ps)(xt − xs) ≤ 0, for all s, t ∈ T, which is the law of demand. 42 (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Assume that condition (ii) holds and define: 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xt − xs)). Rs,t = 1 Clearly, Rs,t = −Rt,s for all s, t ∈ T. Moreover, Rs,t = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xt − xs)) = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) + pt(xs − xt)) = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xs − xt) + 2pt(xs − xt)). By condition (ii), we have ps(xs − xt) − pt(xs − xt) = (ps − pt)(xs − xt) ≤ 0. Hence, Rs,t = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xs − xt) + 2pt(xs − xt) = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xs − xt)) + pt(xs − xt) ⇐⇒ Rs,t − pt(xs − xt) = 1 2(ps(xs − xt) − pt(xs − xt)) ≤ 0, which implies: −Rs,t ≥ −pt(cid:16) Rt,s ≥ pt(cid:16) xs − xt(cid:17) ⇐⇒ xt − xs(cid:17) . This completes the proof. (iii) =⇒ (iv). -- As in the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2, we break OT into T 2 pairwise st = {(pt, xt), (ps, xs)} for all s, t ∈ T. For the two observations in every data data sets O2 st, we define the function ust(x) : X → R as in the proof of Theorem E. From set O2 Theorem E, we know that ust is continuous, strictly increasing, concave, quasilinear and weakly rationalizes the data O2 st. For all x, y ∈ X, we define the mapping: rst : X × X → R as: if s 6= t, if s = t.  ust (x) − ust (y) pt (x − y) rst (x, y) = 43 Next, we define the maximin quasilinear preference function, r, for any x, y ∈ X, as: r(x, y) = min λ∈∆ = max µ∈∆ max µ∈∆ min λ∈∆ λsµtrst(x, y) λsµtrst(x, y). X X s∈T X X t∈T s∈T t∈T We show that the maximin quasilinear preference function rationalizes the data set OT. Consider y ∈ X and some fixed t ∈ T. Let µt ∈ ∆ be the T − 1 simplex such that µt j = 0 if j 6= t and µt j = 1 if j = t. We have: X X s∈T X t∈T λiµt j∈T λirit(xt, y). λsµtrst(xt, y) jrij(xt, y) r(xt, y) = max µ∈∆ ≥ min λ∈∆ = min λ∈∆ min λ∈∆ X X i∈T i∈T It suffices to show that rit(xt, y) ≥ ptxt − pty, for each data set O2 it. But this follows directly from the definition of rit and weak rationalization. Hence, r(x, y) ≥ ptxt − pty for all y ∈ X and all t ∈ T. (iv) =⇒ (i). -- Using the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1 it follows that the maximin quasilinear preference function r constructed above is continuous, skew- symmetric, strictly increasing (in x), piecewise concave in x, piecewise convex in y and quasilinear. (iii) =⇒ (v). -- Suppose that condition (iii) holds and define for all x, y ∈ X the functions: rst (x, y) = Rs,t + ps (x − xs) − pt(cid:16) y − xt(cid:17) . Clearly, the function rst is continuous, strictly increasing and concave in x and convex in y. Since Rs,t = −Rt,s, we have: −rst (x, y) = −(cid:16) Rs,t + ps (x − xs) − pt(cid:16) y − xt(cid:17) − ps (x − xs) Let the T − 1 dimensional simplex be denoted ∆ = {λ ∈ RT+PT = Rt,s + pt(cid:16) = rts (y, x) . y − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: X X r(x, y) = min λ∈∆ max µ∈∆ s∈T t∈T λsµtrst(x, y) t=1 λt = 1}. Define the 44 X X s∈T t∈T = max µ∈∆ min λ∈∆ λsµtrst(x, y). We show that the function r is skew-symmetric, continuous, strictly increasing and concave. First, we show skew-symmetry: −r(x, y) = − min λ∈∆ = max λ∈∆ = max λ∈∆ max µ∈∆ s∈T X X λsµtrst(x, y) X X t∈T −λsµtrst(x, y) X X −λsµtrts(y, x) t∈T s∈T s∈T t∈T min µ∈∆ min µ∈∆ = r(y, x), since −rst(x, y) = rts(y, x). Second, we show that r is continuous. The simplex ∆ consists of a finite number of elements and is therefore compact. Moreover, from above, we know that rst is continuous. Hence, for any λ, µ ∈ ∆, the function f(x, y; λ, µ) =X X s∈T t∈T λsµtrst(x, y), is continuous. By a direct application of Berge's maximum theorem it follows that r(x, y) = minλ∈∆ maxµ∈∆ f(x, y; λ, µ) is a continuous function of x, y ∈ X. Third, we show that r is strictly increasing. Consider x, y, z ∈ X such that x > y. Since each function rst is strictly increasing we have: max µ∈∆ for all ∆. Hence, min λ∈∆ max µ∈∆ X X s∈T t∈T X X s∈T t∈T X X s∈T t∈T λtµsrst(x, z) > max µ∈∆ λtµsrst(y, z), λtµsrst(x, z) > min λ∈∆ max µ∈∆ X X s∈T t∈T λtµsrst(y, z), which shows that r is strictly increasing in the first argument x. Fourth, we will show that r(x, y) is concave in x. Fix y and λ ∈ ∆, and consider the function: rλ (x) = max µ∈∆ λsµtrst (x, y) . X X s∈T t∈T We have: rλ (x) = max µ∈∆ = max µ∈∆ X X s∈T X X t∈T s∈T t∈T λsµtrst (x, y) (cid:16) Rs,t + ps (x − xs) − pt(cid:16) y − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) λsµt 45 λs s∈T X (cid:16) ps (x − xs) +X (cid:16) X X µtRs,t + µtps (x − xs) − µtpt(cid:16) µtRs,t − µtpt(cid:16) (cid:16) µtRs,t − µtpt(cid:16) X X s∈T λsps (x − xs) + max µ∈∆ y − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) y − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) y − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) t∈T t∈T λs . s∈T t∈T = max µ∈∆ = max µ∈∆ = X s∈T Clearly, rλ (x) is linear in x and, as such, concave. Hence, r (x, y) = minλ∈∆ rλ (x) is the minimum over a set of linear function and is therefore also concave. Finally, we show that r is a quasilinear preference function that rationalizes the data. For all x ∈ X and all t ∈ T: (cid:16) r xt, x (cid:17) = min λ∈∆ ≥ min λ∈∆ = min λ∈∆ X t∈T λsµt (cid:16) X X s∈T v∈T λsrst max µ∈∆ X X s∈T t∈T (cid:17) (cid:16) (cid:17) λsµtrst xt, x (cid:16) (cid:17) vrsv xt, x xt, x , v = 1 when v = t and zero otherwise. Note that the term pt(x − xt) does not where µt depend on s, which implies: r(xt, x) ≥ min λ∈∆ = min λ∈∆ s∈T xt, x λsrst (cid:17) (cid:16) X xt − xs(cid:17) − pt(cid:16) Rs,t + ps(cid:16) (cid:16) X λspt(cid:16) x − xt(cid:17) + min (cid:16) = −X X = −pt(cid:16) (cid:16) x − xt(cid:17) + min Rs,t + ps(cid:16) X x − xt(cid:17)(cid:17) Rs,t + ps(cid:16) xt − xs(cid:17)(cid:17) λ∈∆ s∈T s∈T s∈T λs λs λs . xt − xs(cid:17)(cid:17) λ∈∆ s∈T We conclude that r is a quasilinear preference function that weakly rationalizes the data OT since: (cid:16) r xt, x (cid:17) − pt(cid:16) xt − x Rs,t + ps(cid:16) (cid:16) xt − xs(cid:17)(cid:17) λs X s∈T (cid:17) = min λ∈∆ ≥ 0, because Rs,t + ps (xt − xs) ≥ 0 by condition (iii) and λs ≥ 0 for all s, t ∈ T. (v) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. 46 Proofs of Section 7: Infinite Data Sets: Characterizations of WGARP and WARP. In order to prove Theorem 5, we need an auxiliary lemma, which is a modification of Algorithm 3 in Varian (1982). Lemma 3. Consider a finite data set OT, and suppose that OT satisfies SARP. Then: (i) There exist numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T, such that the inequalities: U t − U s ≥ λtpt(xt − xs), hold for all s, t ∈ T, with a strict inequality when xt 6= xs. (ii) There exists a continuous function that maps the data set OT to the numbers U t, λt for all t ∈ T. Proof. We begin with (i). Let g : RL → R++ be any continuous function such that g(x) = 0 if and only if x = 0, and let > 0 be a scalar. For any subset I of T, let max I denote the index of a maximum element of OT relative to the revealed preference order. Consider the following algorithm: Input: A set of price-quantity observations OT satisfying SARP. Output: Numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T satisfying the inequalities in statement (i). 1. Let I = {1, ..., n} and B 6= ∅. 2. Let m = max(I). 3. Set E = {i ∈ I : xi (cid:23)R xm}. If B = ∅, then set U m = λm = 1 and go to step 6; else go to step 4. 4. Set U m = mini∈E minj∈B min{U j + λjpj(xi − xj) − g(xi − xj)}. 5. Set λm = maxi∈E maxj∈B max{(U j − U m + g(xj − xm))/pm(xi − xm)}. 6. Set I = I \ E and B = B ∪ E. If I 6= ∅, then stop; otherwise, go to step 2. We now prove that this algorithm generates numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T that satisfies the inequalities in statement (i). From step 4, we have: U m ≤ U j + λjpj(xm − xj) − g(xm − xj), and λm ≥ (U j − U m + g(xm − xj))/pm(xj − xm), 47 for all m, j ∈ T. This implies that: U j − U m ≤ λmpm(xj − xm) − g(xm − xj), for all m, j ∈ T. Hence, this shows that the algorithm guarantees that there exist numbers U t and λt > 0 for all t ∈ T satisfying the inequalities in statement (i). Moreover, it is clear that this algorithm provides a continuous function that maps the (cid:4) data set OT to the numbers U t, λt for all t ∈ T, which proves statement (ii). Proof of Theorem 5 (i) =⇒ (ii). -- Trivial. (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Suppose that WGARP in statement (ii) holds. For every pair of observa- tions in the data set O∞, we let O2 = {(p, a), (q, b)} denote the data set consisting of any pair (p, a), (q, b) ∈ O∞. Overall, we have a continuum of such data sets, which exhausts all possible pairwise comparisons in O∞. We rearrange O2 into a vector o = (p0 a0 q0 b0)0 ∈ O2, where the set of reference points is defined to be O = P × X with x ∈ x(p, px), such that each data set O2 can be thought of as a column vector (Recall that under our assumptions O is a compact and metric space). We define o1 = (p0 a0)0 and o2 = (q0 b0)0, such that o = (o0 Since every data set o satisfies WGARP, we can directly apply Algorithm 3 in Varian (1982), which specifies a continuous function that maps finite data sets to the numbers Uoi and λoi > 0 for i ∈ {1, 2} satisfying the Afriat inequalities for every data set o. We can then use these numbers to define the utility function uo1o2(x) = mini∈{1,2}{Uoi + λoipi(x − xi)} as in Afriat's theorem that is continuous for all x ∈ X, strictly increasing and concave on o (In the case of strict rationalizability, we simply apply Lemma 3, and then define the function uo1o2 as in Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem. As such, we know that uo1o2 is continuous, strictly concave and strictly increasing).22 Next, we define the mapping: ro1o2 : X × X → R as: 1 o0 2)0. ro1o2(x, y) = uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y), for all x, y ∈ X. Clearly, ro1o2 is continuous (since uo1o2 is continuous) and (strictly) concave in the first argument (since uo1o2 is (strictly) concave). Moreover, it is skew- symmetric since ro1o2(y, x) = uo1o2(y) − uo1o2(x) = −ro1o2(x, y). Notice that since ro1o2 is constructed for every o−vector of observations in O∞ we have an infinite collection of 22If o1 = o2 then we set uo1o2 = p(x − y) in the weak case and uo1o2 = p(x − y) − (g(x − a) − g(y − b)) in the strict case, for some small scalar > 0 and a function g defined in Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem. 48 functions ro1o2. Define the preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: r(x, y) = min λ∈∆(O) = max µ∈∆(O) max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2), where the second equality follows from Lemma 2.23 We prove that the function r weakly (strictly) rationalizes the data set O∞. Consider y ∈ X and some fixed o1 = (p0 x0)0 ∈ O such that px ≥ py. Let µo1 ∈ ∆(O) be the probability measure such that µo1(q, b) = 0 if (q0 b)0 6= o1 and µo1(q, b) = 1 when (q0 b)0 = o1. We have: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(O) ≥ min λ∈∆(O) = min λ∈∆(O) Z Z min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµo1(o2) o1∈O o1∈O o2∈O ro1o1(x, y)dλ(o1). It suffices to show that ro1o1(x, y)(>) ≥ 0 whenever px ≥ py, for each data set o = (o0 1 o1)0. But this follows directly from the definition of ro1o1 and Afriat's theorem (In the case of strict rationalizability, it follows from Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem). Specifically, notice that if px ≥ py then x (cid:23)R,D y for o1 = (p0 x)0 since, in such case, uo1o1(x)(>) ≥ uo1o1(y). Hence, r(x, y)(>) ≥ 0. (iii) =⇒ (iv). -- We verify that the preference function r is skew-symmetric, continuous, strictly increasing and (strictly) piecewise concave in x (and (strictly) piecewise convex in y). First, we show skew-symmetry. We have: −r(x, y) = − min λ∈∆(O) Z max µ∈∆(O) min µ∈∆(O) = max λ∈∆(O) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) o2∈O (−ro1o2(x, y))dλ(o1)dµ(o2). Z Z o1∈O Z o1∈O o2∈O Since ro1o2 is skew-symmetric (i.e., −ro1o2(x, y) = ro1o2(y, x)), we have −r(x, y) = r(y, x), which proves that r is skew-symmetric. Second, we show that r is continuous. The simplex ∆(O) is a compact set and since ro1o2 is defined as the difference between two continuous functions (by Afriat's theorem), 23The minimax theorem in Glicksberg (1950) requires that ∆(O) is a compact metric space, and that r• is a continuous function. We have already shown that this holds by construction, so we can directly apply this version of the minimax theorem. 49 it is continuous itself. Thus, for any λ, µ ∈ ∆(O), the function f(x, y; λ, µ) = ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2), Z Z o1∈O o2∈O is continuous. By a direct application of Berge's maximum theorem it follows that r(x, y) = minλ∈∆(O) maxµ∈∆(O) f(x, y; λ, µ) is a continuous function of x, y ∈ X. Third, we show that r is strictly increasing. Consider any x, y, z ∈ X such that x > y. Then: ro1o2(x, z) = uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(z) > uo1o2(y) − uo1o2(z) = ro1o2(y, z), where uo1o2(x) > uo1o2(y) follows by Afriat's theorem. Hence, r(x, z) > r(y, z). In the case of strict rationalizability, it follows that r satisfies skew-symmetry, continuity and strict monotonicity by simply replacing Afriat's theorem with Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem in the proofs above. R Finally, we show that r is (strictly) piecewise concave in x (and (strictly) piecewise convex in y). Consider any x ∈ X and a fixed z ∈ X. The function ro1o2(x, z) = uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(z) is (strictly) concave in x since uo1o2(x) is (strictly) concave by Afriat's theorem (Matzkin and Richter's (1991) theorem) and the difference between a (strictly) R concave function and a constant is (strictly) concave. Moreover, the function fz(x; λ, µ) = o2∈O ro1o2(x, z)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) is (strictly) concave for any λ, µ ∈ ∆, since the linear o1∈O combination of (strictly) concave functions is (strictly) concave. It then follows that the function gz(x; λ) = minµ∈∆(O) fz(x; λ, µ) is (strictly) concave in the first argument for all λ ∈ ∆(O). Thus, by definition the function hz(x) = maxλ∈∆(O) gz(x; λ) is (strictly) piecewise concave. By skew-symmetry the mapping r is (strictly) piecewise convex in the second argument. This completes the proof. (iv) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. Proof of Theorem 6 (i) =⇒ (ii). -- Suppose that the data O∞ satisfies statement (i), in which case, for all x, y ∈ X: r(x, y) ≥ p(x − y), and r(y, x) ≥ q(y − x), 50 such that x ∈ x(p, px) and y ∈ x(q, qy). Adding these inequalities, and by skew-symmetry, we have: 0 = r(x, y) + r(y, x) ≥ p(x − y) + q(y − x). Rearranging terms, we get: (p − q)(x − y) ≤ 0, which is the law of demand. (ii) =⇒ (iii). -- Suppose that statement (ii) holds. Define o1 = (p0 a0)0 and o2 = (q0 b0)0, such that o = (o0 2)0 as in the proof of Theorem 5. Since the law of demand holds by definition, we can use the algorithm in the proof of Theorem E to find numbers that satisfies the inequalities in statement (iii) in Theorem E. As shown in the proof of Theorem E, these numbers can then be used to construct a continuous, strictly increasing and concave utility function uo1o2 for all x ∈ X and every o. 1 o0 We define the mapping: ro1o2 : X × X → R as: ro1o2(x, y) = uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y), for all x, y ∈ X. Clearly, ro1o2 is continuous, concave (in the first argument and convex in the second argument), and skew-symmetric. Next, define the preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: r(x, y) = min λ∈∆(O) = max µ∈∆(O) max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2). We prove that the function r rationalizes the data set O∞. Consider y ∈ X and some fixed o1 = (p0 x0)0 ∈ O. Let µo1 ∈ ∆(O) be the probability measure such that µo1(q, b) = 0 if (q0 b)0 6= o1 and µo1(q, b) = 1 when (q0 b)0 = o1. We have: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r(x, y) = max µ∈∆(O) ≥ min λ∈∆(O) = min λ∈∆(O) Z Z min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµo1(o2) o1∈O o1∈O o2∈O ro1o1(x, y)dλ(o1). It suffices to show that ro1o1(x, y) ≥ p(x − y) for each data set o = (o0 follows directly from the definition of ro1o1 and Theorem E. Hence, r(x, y) ≥ p(x − y). (iii) =⇒ (i). -- It follows directly from the proof of (ii) =⇒ (iii) that the constructed generalized maximin quasilinear preference function is also locally nonsatiated and skew- symmetric. 1 o1)0. But this 51 1 o0 (ii) =⇒ (iv). -- Suppose that statement (ii) holds. Define o1 = (p0 a0)0 and o2 = (q0 b0)0, 2)0 as in the proof of Theorem 5. Since the law of demand holds by such that o = (o0 definition, we can use the algorithm in the proof of Theorem E to find numbers that satisfies the inequalities in statement (iii) in Theorem E. We can define for every dataset oi, i = 1, 2: uo1(x) = uo1 + p(x − a)uo2(y) = uo2 + q(y − b). We define the mapping: ro1o2 : X × X → R ro1o2(x, y) = uo1o2(x) − uo1o2(y), ro1o2(x, y) = Ro1,o2 + p(x − a) − q(y − b), where Ro1,o2 = uo1 − uo2, for all x, y ∈ X. Clearly, ro1o2 is continuous, linear in both arguments, and skew-symmetric. Next, define the preference function r(x, y) for any x, y ∈ X as: r(x, y) = min λ∈∆(O) = max µ∈∆(O) max µ∈∆(O) min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2) ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2). Exactly as in the proof of (ii) =⇒ (iii), we conclude that r is strictly increasing and continuous. We show that r is concave: Fix y and λ ∈ ∆(O). Consider: Z Z Z Z Z Z fλ,y(x) = max µ∈∆(O) o1∈O o2∈O ro1o2(x, y)dλ(o1)dµ(o2). We have: fλ,y(x) = max µ∈∆(O) = Z o1∈O Z Z o1∈O [p(x − a) max µ∈∆(O) o2∈O Z [Ro1,o2 + p(x − a) − q(y − b)]dλ(o1)dµ(o2) [Ro1,o2 − q(y − b)]dµ(o2)]dλ(o1). Observe that fλ,y(x) is linear in x and therefore concave. Hence, r(x, y) = min λ∈∆(O) o1∈O fλ,y(x)dλ(o1), o2∈O Z is the minimum over a set of linear functions and therefore concave. We omit the proof that the function r rationalizes the data set O∞ because it is completely analogous to the proof of Theorem 4 ((iii) =⇒ (v)) for the finite data case. Note that we can use the appropriate minimax theorem for the infinite data case as in the proof of (ii) =⇒ (iii). 52 (iii) =⇒ (i). -- It follows directly from the proof of (ii) =⇒ (iii) that the constructed generalized maximin quasilinear preference function is also locally nonsatiated and skew- symmetric. (iv) =⇒ (i). -- Trivial. 53
1904.08551	2	1904	2019-10-23T00:32:47	Asymptotic Behavior of Bayesian Learners with Misspecified Models	[ "econ.TH", "math.ST", "math.ST" ]	We consider an agent who represents uncertainty about the environment via a possibly misspecified model. Each period, the agent takes an action, observes a consequence, and uses Bayes' rule to update her belief about the environment. This framework has become increasingly popular in economics to study behavior driven by incorrect or biased beliefs. Current literature has characterized asymptotic behavior under fairly specific assumptions. By first showing that the key element to predict the agent's behavior is the frequency of her past actions, we are able to characterize asymptotic behavior in general settings in terms of the solutions of a generalization of a differential equation that describes the evolution of the frequency of actions. We then present a series of implications that can be readily applied to economic applications, thus providing off-the-shelf tools that can be used to characterize behavior under misspecified learning.	econ.TH	econ	Asymptotic Behavior of Bayesian Learners with Misspecified Models ∗ Ignacio Esponda (UC Santa Barbara) Demian Pouzo (UC Berkeley) Yuichi Yamamoto (Hitotsubashi Univ.) October 24, 2019 Abstract We consider an agent who represents uncertainty about the environment via a possibly misspecified model. Each period, the agent takes an action, observes a consequence, and uses Bayes' rule to update her belief about the environment. This framework has become increasingly popular in economics to study behavior driven by incorrect or biased beliefs. Current literature has characterized asymptotic behavior under fairly specific assumptions. By first showing that the key element to predict the agent's behavior is the frequency of her past actions, we are able to characterize asymptotic behavior in general settings in terms of the solutions of a generalization of a differential equation that describes the evolution of the frequency of actions. We then present a series of implications that can be readily applied to economic applications, thus providing off-the- shelf tools that can be used to characterize behavior under misspecified learning. ∗We thank Drew Fudenberg, Ryota Iijima, Yuhta Ishii, Dale Stahl, Philipp Strack, and several seminar par- ticipants for helpful comments. Esponda: Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara, 2127 North Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, [email protected]; Pouzo: Department of Economics, UC Berkeley, 530-1 Evans Hall #3880, Berkeley, CA 94720, [email protected]. Yamamoto: 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8603 Japan, [email protected]. Contents 1 Introduction 2 The environment 3 Asymptotic characterization of beliefs 4 Asymptotic characterization of action frequencies 5 Convergence results 6 Relationship to Berk-Nash equilibrium References A Appendix 1 5 8 11 15 30 32 36 1 Introduction Over the last few decades, evidence of systematic mistakes and biases in beliefs has been col- lected in a large range of economic environments. Moreover, the evidence indicates that many of these mistakes persist with experience.1 One approach to incorporating these findings in our theories is to simply postulate that economic agents have fixed, wrong beliefs about aspects of their environment, and never learn about these aspects. A different approach that has gained popularity over the last few years is to postulate that agents do learn about their environment, but they do so in the context of a misspecified model that misses some important aspects of reality. The idea is that the world is complex and it is natural for economic agents to represent uncertainty about the world with parsimonious models that are likely to be misspecified. The researcher who follows this approach is forced to specify the agent's misspecification, and the direction of biases is often not ex-ante obvious without further analysis. Examples of misspecified learning in economics date back to the 1970s and include the following: A firm estimates a demand model but wrongly excludes competitors' prices (Arrow and Green (1973), Kirman (1975)); a teacher assesses how praise and criticism affect student performance, but does not understand regression to the mean (Tversky and Kahneman (1973), Esponda and Pouzo (2016)); a person faces an increasing marginal income tax rate but behaves as if facing a constant marginal tax (Sobel (1984), Liebman and Zeckhauser (2004), Esponda and Pouzo (2016)); when learning the value of assets, policies, or investment projects, traders, voters, and investors fail to account for sample selection (Esponda (2008), Esponda and Pouzo (2017, 2019a), Jehiel (2018)); a seller estimates a constant-elasticity demand function, but elasticity is not constant (Nyarko (1991), Fudenberg, Romanyuk and Strack (2017)); a person inverts causal relationships and incorrectly believes that diet affects a chemical in the blood which in turn affects health (Spiegler (2016)); overconfidence biases an agent's learning of a fundamental (Heidhues, Koszegi and Strack (2018a)). In all of these examples, the agent processes information through the lens of a simple model that misses some aspect of reality. The main question in the literature is what happens to the agent's behavior as time goes by and she uses feedback to update her belief about the model's primitives. The direction of the bias is often not obvious because the agent's behavior affects the feedback she observes, this feedback is in turn processed via the agent's misspecified model, and this processing leads to updated beliefs and subsequent changes in behavior, which in turn lead to changes in beliefs, and so on. 1For discussions of the evidence, see, for example, Camerer and Johnson (1997) and Section 3.D in Rabin (1998). 1 Despite these examples, we have not yet fully understood how model misspecification affects the long-run learning outcome. Indeed, most of the existing papers consider some- what specialized setups, and we do not know whether the learning process converges beyond these particular cases. This paper develops a unified theory on Bayesian learning with model misspecification, which hopefully shapes our understanding of why different models in the literature lead to different conclusions and allows us to characterize behavior in a much wider range of settings. We consider the following environment, which includes many situations of interest, in- cluding the examples described above. Time is discrete and there is a single, infinitely-lived agent who discounts the future and must take an action in each period. The agent's action po- tentially affects the distribution of an observable variable, which we call a consequence. Her per-period payoff depends on the agent's action and the realized consequence. The true distri- bution over consequences as a function of an action x ∈ X is given by Q(· x) ∈ ∆(Y ), where Y is the set of consequences. The agent, however, does not know Q. She has a parametric model of it, given by (Qθ (· x))x∈X, where parameter values, such as θ, belong to a parameter space Θ. The agent is Bayesian, so she has a prior over Θ and updates her prior in each period after observing the realized consequence. The agent's model is misspecified if the support of her prior does not include the true distribution Q, and it is correctly specified otherwise.2 Our key point of departure from previous literature is that we begin by focusing on the evolution of the frequency of actions rather than on actions alone or on the agent's belief. The frequency of actions at time t + 1 can be written recursively as a function of the frequency at time t plus some innovation term that depends on the agent's action at time t + 1. The action at time t + 1, however, depends on the agent's belief at time t, and one challenge is to be able to write this belief as a function of frequencies of actions so as to make this recursion depend exclusively on frequencies, not beliefs. Extending results by Berk (1966) and Esponda and Pouzo (2016), we show that eventu- ally the posterior at time t roughly concentrates on the set of parameter values that minimize Kullback-Leibler divergence given the frequency of actions up to time t. This result allows us to write the evolution of frequencies of actions recursively as a function of the past frequency alone, excluding the belief. We then apply techniques from stochastic approximation devel- oped by Benaïm, Hofbauer and Sorin (2005) to show that the continuous-time approximation of the frequency of actions can be essentially characterized as a solution to a generalization 2The correctly-specified version of this environment was originally studied by Easley and Kiefer (1988) and Aghion, Bolton, Harris and Jullien (1991). 2 of a differential equation.3 Finally, we present a series of implications that can be readily applied to economic applications, thus providing off-the-shelf tools that can be valuable to people working in this area. In fact, for the special case of one-dimensional models -- a case that includes most of the applications in the literature -- our results imply that one can essentially characterize convergence and stability by looking at a simple two-dimensional figure. Our results pertain to the agent's long-run behavior, and there are at least three reasons why the focus on long-run behavior is important. First, there are many instances where it is not surprising that people initially make incorrect decisions and the more interesting question is what types of biases persist with experience. Second, systematic patterns tend to arise as time goes by, while initial behavior tends to be more dependent on random draws. Finally, there is a long tradition in statistic and economics focusing on asymptotic or equilibrium behavior, and so we can use existing tools as well as compare our results to existing results in these literatures. Our work benefits from previous work on misspecified learning. Our environment is the single-agent version of the environment studied by Esponda and Pouzo (2016). They introduce the notion of a Berk-Nash equilibrium and show that, under some conditions, if behavior con- verges then it must converge to a Berk-Nash equilibrium.4 But they do not study convergence in general.5 Papers that study convergence in misspecified settings are few and ingeniously establish results, though for somewhat specialized setups. Nyarko (1991) presents an example where the agent's action does not converge. Fudenberg, Romanyuk and Strack (2017) consider a more general model where the agent has a finite number of actions but still updates between two possible models (i.e., Θ has two elements). They provide a full characterization of asymptotic actions and beliefs, including cases where the action converges and cases where it does not. Their model is in continuous time and they exploit the fact that the belief over Θ follows a one- dimensional stochastic differential equation. Heidhues, Koszegi and Strack (2018a) study a 3The type of differential equation is called a differential inclusion in the literature. It differs from a differential equation in that there may be multiple derivatives at certain points and therefore multiple trajectories that solve the equation. Multiplicity arises in our environment because there are certain beliefs at which the agent is indifferent between different actions, and we need to keep track of what would happen to beliefs and subsequent actions if the agent were to follow any one of these actions. 4There are many examples of boundedly-rational equilibrium concepts that abstract away from the question of dynamics and convergence, including (Jehiel, 2005, 1995), Osborne and Rubinstein (1998), Eyster and Rabin (2005), Esponda (2008), Jehiel and Koessler (2008), and (Spiegler, 2016, 2017). 5Esponda and Pouzo (2016) tackle the issue of convergence in Theorem 3, where they use an idea from Fudenberg and Kreps (1993) to show that, if agents are allowed to make possibly large but vanishing mistakes, then behavior can converge to any equilibrium. Here, as in the rest of the literature on misspecified learning, we consider the case where agents don't make these types of mistakes. 3 model of an agent whose overconfidence biases his learning of a fundamental that is relevant for determining the optimal action. They are able to establish convergence by exploiting the monotone structure of their environment. Heidhues, Koszegi and Strack (2018b) consider an environment where action spaces are continuous, the state has a unidirectional effect on output, and the prior and noise are normal. These assumptions imply that the posterior admits a one-dimensional summary statistic, to which they apply tools from stochastic approximation theory to establish convergence.6 As mentioned above, we are able to make significantly more progress by focusing on the frequency of actions, as opposed to the action itself or the belief.7 Tools from stochastic approximation have been previously applied in economics, includ- ing the literature on learning in games (e.g., Fudenberg and Kreps (1993), Benaim and Hirsch (1999), and Hofbauer and Sandholm (2002)) and learning in macroeconomics (e.g., Sargent (1993)). Our approach is inspired by Fudenberg and Kreps (1993)'s model of stochastic fic- titious play. In that environment, the frequency of past actions exactly represents the agents' beliefs about other agents' strategies. In our environment, we characterize beliefs to be a function of the frequency of actions. Misspecified learning has also been studied in other environments. Rabin and Vayanos (2010) study a case where shocks are i.i.d. but agents believe them to be autoregressive. Esponda and Pouzo (2019b) extend Berk-Nash equilibrium to Markov decision problems, where a state variable, other than a belief, affects continuation values. He (2018) considers agents suffering from the gambler's fallacy who mislearn from endogenously censored data. Molavi (2018) studies a general-equilibrium framework that nests a class of macroeconomic models where agents learn with misspecified models. Bohren and Hauser (2018) and Frick, Iijima and Ishii (2019a) characterize asymptotic behavior in social learning environments with model misspecification.8 Finally, Frick, Iijima and Ishii (2019b) focus on convergence and ro- bustness of the stability of equilibrium in both single-agent and social learning environments. We do not study robustness but study asymptotic properties of the learning process in a more general way. In particular, we develop general tools to study whether behavior converges or not, and what happens if it does not converge. We believe our results can be extended to these other environments. 6For another example using normality assumptions and stochastic approximation, see the online appendix of Esponda and Pouzo (2016). 7Incidentally, we show that in some of the examples of Nyarko (1991) and Fudenberg, Romanyuk and Strack (2017) where the action diverges, the action frequency converges. This is the first result of its kind and it provides a new interpretation of a mixed-action steady state. We also present examples where not even the action frequency converges. 8See also Eyster and Rabin (2010), Bohren (2016), and Gagnon-Bartsch and Rabin (2017). 4 Finally, we take the misspecification as given and establish results for all types of mis- specifications. For work that could help understand which types of misspecifications are more likely to arise, see, e.g., Aragones et al. (2005), Al-Najjar (2009), Al-Najjar and Pai (2013), Schwartzstein (2014), and Olea et al. (2019). We present the model in Section 2, characterize asymptotic beliefs in Section 3 and asymp- totic behavior in Section 4, and then present implications relevant to economic applications in Section 5. We relate our findings to the notion of a Berk-Nash equilibrium in Section 6. 2 The environment Objective environment. There is a single agent facing the following infinitely repeated prob- lem. Each period t = 1,2, ..., the agent must choose an action from a finite set X. She then receives a consequence according to the consequence function Q : X → ∆Y , where Y is the set of consequences and ∆Y is the set of all (Borel) probability measures over it. Finally, the payoff function π : X ×Y → R determines the agent's current payoff. In particular, if xt ∈ X is the agent's choice at time t, then yt ∈ Y is drawn according to the probability measure Q(· xt) ∈ ∆Y , and the agent's payoff at time t is π(xt,yt). Assumption 1. (i) Y is a compact subset of Euclidean space; (ii) There exists a Borel proba- bility measure ν ∈ ∆Y such that, for all x ∈ X, Q(·x) (cid:28) ν, i.e., Q(·x) is absolutely continuous ´ with respect to ν (an implication is the existence of densities q(· x) ∈ L1(Y,R,ν) such that A q(y x)ν(dy) = Q(Ax) for any A ⊆ Y Borel); (iii) For all x ∈ X, π(x,·) ∈ L1(Y,R,Q(· x)).9 Assumption 1 collects some standard technical conditions. It includes both the case where the consequence is a continuous variable ( ν is the Lebesgue measure and q(· x) is the density function) and the case where it is discrete ( ν is the counting measure and q(· x) is the probability mass function). In the special case in which the agent knows the primitives and wishes to maximize dis- counted expected utility, she chooses an action in each period from the set of actions that maximizes π(x,y)Q(dy x) = Y Y π(x,y)q(yx)ν(dy). ´ We will study the case where the agent does not know the consequence function Q. f (y)p ν(dy) < ∞. 9As usual, Lp(Y,R,ν) denotes the space of all functions f : Y → R such that 5 Subjective family of models. The agent is endowed with a parametric family of conse- quence functions, QΘ = {Qθ : θ ∈ Θ}, where each Qθ : X → ∆Y is indexed by a model θ ∈ Θ. We refer to QΘ as the family of models and say that it is correctly specified if Q ∈ QΘ and misspecified otherwise. ´ Assumption 2. (i) For all θ ∈ Θ and x ∈ X, Qθ (·x) (cid:28) ν, where ν is defined in A1 (an implication is the existence of densities qθ (· x) ∈ L1(Y,R,ν) such that A qθ (y x)ν(dy) = Qθ (Ax) for any A ⊆ Y Borel); (ii) Θ is a compact subset of an Euclidean space and, for all x ∈ X, θ (cid:55)→ qθ (· x) is continuous Q(· x)-a.s.; ; (iii) For all x ∈ X, there exists gx ∈ L2(Y,R,Q(· x)) such that, for all θ ∈ Θ, ln(q(· x)/qθ (· x)) ≤ gx(·) a.s.-Q(· x). Assumption 2(i) guarantees the existence of a density function, and 2(ii) is a standard parametric assumption on the subjective model. Assumption 2(iii) will be used to establish a uniform law of large numbers. This condition also implies that, for all θ and x, the support of Qθ (· x) contains the support of Q(· x); in particular, every observation can be generated by the agent's model. Bayesian learning. The agent is Bayesian and starts with a prior µ0 over the space of models Θ. She observes past actions and consequences and uses this information to update her belief about Θ in every period. The timing is as follows: At each time t, the agent holds some belief µt. Given µt, she chooses an action xt. Then the consequence yt is drawn according to Q(· xt). The agent observes yt, receives an immediate payoff of π(xt,yt), and updates her belief to µt+1 = B(xt,yt, µt), where B is the Bayesian operator.10 The next assumption guarantees that the prior has full support. Assumption 3. µ0(A) > 0 for any A open and non-empty. Policy and probability distribution over histories. A policy f is a function f : ∆Θ → X specifying the action f (µ) ∈ X that the agent takes at any moment in time in which her belief is µ.11 A history is a sequence h = (x0,y0, ...,xt,yt, ...) ∈ H ≡ (X ×Y )∞. Together with the primitives of the problem, a policy f induces a probability distribution over the set of histories, which we will denote by P f . ´ A qθ (y x)µ(dθ )/ ´ B(x,y, µ)(A) = 10The Bayesian operator B : X ×Y × ∆Θ → ∆Θ satisfies, for all A ⊆ Θ Borel, for any x ∈ X, and a.s.-Q(· x), 11We do not allow the agent to mix to simplify the exposition and to highlight the fact that a mixed distribution over actions may describe limiting behavior despite the fact that the agent never actually mixes. In the more gen- eral case where f maps into ∆X, our main result (Theorem 2) holds exactly as stated but some of the statements in Section 5 need to be modified accordingly. Θ qθ (y x)µ(dθ ). 6 Policy correspondence. It will be convenient to characterize behavior for a family of poli- cies, and not just for a single policy function. For this purpose, we define a policy correspon- dence to be a mapping F : ∆Θ ⇒ X, where F(µ) ⊆ X denotes the set of actions that the agent might choose any time her belief is µ ∈ ∆Θ. We sometimes abuse notation and, for a set of probability measures A ⊆ ∆Θ, we let F(A) represent the set of actions x such that x ∈ F(µ) for some µ ∈ A. Let Sel(F) denote the set of all policies f that constitute a selection from the correspondence F, i.e., with the property that f (µ) ∈ F(µ) for all µ. Assumption 4. The policy correspondence F is upper hemi-continuous (uhc). An important special case is one where the agent maximizes discounted expected utility with discount factor β ∈ [0,1). This problem can be cast recursively as (1) (cid:8)π(x,y) + βW (µ(cid:48))(cid:9) ¯Qµ (dyx) W (µ) = max x∈X Y ´ where W : ∆Θ → R is the (unique) solution to the Bellman equation (1), µ(cid:48) = B(x,y, µ) is the Bayesian posterior, and ¯Qµ ≡ Θ Qθ µ(dθ ). In this case, it is well known that the correspon- dence mapping beliefs to optimal actions is uhc. Action frequency. Our main objective is to study regularities in asymptotic behavior. Pre- vious work has focused on characterizing the limit of the sequence of actions, whenever it exists. But there are cases where actions do not converge (e.g., Nyarko (1991)), and in those cases previous work has not much else to say about asymptotic behavior. We make progress by studying the action frequency. We do so for two reasons. First, from a practical perspec- tive, even if actions do not converge, it is possible for the frequency of actions to converge. Thus, studying frequencies can help uncover additional regularities in behavior, with impor- tant implications regarding, for example, limiting average payoffs. Second, as we will show, asymptotic beliefs depend crucially on the action frequency. Because actions in turn depend on beliefs, future actions depend crucially on the frequency of past actions. For every t, we define the action frequency at time t to be a function σt : H → ∆X defined such that, for all h ∈ H and x ∈ X, σt(h)(x) = 1 t t ∑ τ=1 1(x)(xτ (h)) is the fraction of times that action x occurs in history h by time period t. 7 3 Asymptotic characterization of beliefs In this section, we take as given the sequence of action frequencies, (σt)t, and we characterize the agent's asymptotic beliefs. In subsequent sections, we will use the characterization of beliefs to characterize the sequence (σt)t, which is ultimately an endogenous object. The key object in our characterization is the notion of Kullback-Leibler divergence.12 Definition 1. The Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) is a function K : Θ× ∆X → R such that, for any θ ∈ Θ and σ ∈ ∆X, (cid:20) (cid:21) σ (x) q(y x)ν(dy)σ (x). K(θ ,σ ) = ∑ x∈X = ∑ x∈X EQ(·x) ln q(Y x) qθ (Y x) ln Y q(y x) qθ (y x) The set of closest models given σ is the set Θ(σ ) ≡ argminθ∈Θ K(θ ,σ ) and the mini- mized KLD given σ is K∗(σ ) ≡ minθ∈Θ K(θ ,σ ). Lemma 1. (i) (θ ,σ ) (cid:55)→ K(θ ,σ ) − K∗(σ ) is continuous; (ii) Θ(·) is uhc, nonempty-, and compact-valued. Proof. See Appendix A.1. If the actions were drawn from an i.i.d. distribution σ ∈ ∆X, we could directly apply Berk's (1966) result to conclude that the posterior eventually concentrates on the set of closest models given σ (i.e., for all open sets U ⊇ Θ(σ ), limt→∞ µt(U) = 1 P f -a.s.).13 EP2016 showed that Berk's conclusion extends even if actions are not i.i.d., provided that the distribution over actions at time t converges to a distribution σ. This type of result is useful to characterize behavior under the assumption that it stabilizes, but it is insufficient to determine whether or not behavior stabilizes. In the current section, we provide a characterization of beliefs that does not rely on the assumption that behavior stabilizes. Roughly speaking, we will show that the distance between the agent's belief at time t, µt, and the set of probability measures with support in Θ(σt) goes 12Formally, what we call KLD is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the distributions q· σ and qθ · σ defined over the space X ×Y . 13See also Bunke and Milhaud (1998). Relatedly, White (1982) shows that the Kullback-Leibler divergence characterizes the limiting behavior of the maximum quasi-likelihood estimator. 8 to zero as time goes to infinity, irrespective of whether or not (σt)t converges. We will establish this result in several steps, which we now discuss informally and then address formally in the proofs. First, we note that for any Borel set A ⊆ Θ, the posterior belief over A can be written as τ=1 qθ (yτ xτ )µ0(dθ ) τ=1 qθ (yτ xτ )µ0(dθ ) ´ ´ A ∏t ´ Θ ∏t ´ A e−tLt (θ )µ0(dθ ) Θ e−tLt (θ )µ0(dθ ) µt+1(A) = = , (2) τ=1 ln q(yτxτ ) where Lt(θ ) ≡ t−1 ∑t qθ (yτxτ ) is the sample average of the log-likelihood ratios, and where we have omitted the history for simplicity. Naturally, we might expect the sample average to converge to its expectation for each θ. The next result strengthens this intuition and establishes that the difference between Lt(·) and K(·,σt) converges uniformly to zero as t → ∞. Lemma 2. Under Assumptions 1-2, for any policy f , limt→∞ supθ∈ΘLt(θ )− K(θ ,σt) = 0 P f -a.s. Proof. See Appendix A.2. The next step is to replace Lt(·) in (2) with K(·,σt). By Lemma 2, for sufficiently large t, we obtain ´ ´ µt+1(A) ≈ A e−tK(θ ,σt )µ0(dθ ) Θ e−tK(θ ,σt )µ0(dθ ) . (3) As t → ∞, the posterior concentrates on models where K(θ ,σt) is close to its minimized value, K∗(σt). This statement is seen most easily for the case where Θ has only two elements, θ1 and θ2. In this case, (3) becomes µt+1(θ1) ≈ 1/(1 + µ0(θ2)e−tK(θ2,σt ) µ0(θ1)e−tK(θ1,σt ) ). (4) Suppose, for example, that (σt)t converges to σ and that KLD is minimized at θ1 given σ. Then there exists ε > 0 such that, for all sufficiently large t, K(θ2,σt) − K(θ1,σt) > ε. It follows from (4) that µt+1(θ1) converges to 1, so the posterior concentrates on the model that minimizes KLD given σ. When (σt)t does not converge, however, we have to account for the possibility that K(θ2,σt)− K(θ1,σt) > 0 for all t but K(θ2,σt)− K(θ1,σt) → 0 as t → 0. In 9 this case, we cannot say that the posterior eventually puts probability 1 on θ1, even though θ1 always minimizes KLD. This is why the next result says that the posterior concentrates on models where K(θ ,σt) is close to its minimized value, K∗(σt), as opposed to saying that the posterior asymptotically concentrates on the minimizers of KLD given σt.14 We now state the result formally and provide a proof. Theorem 1. Under Assumptions 1-3, for any policy f , lim t→∞ Θ (K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt))µt+1(dθ ) = 0 P f -a.s. (5) Proof. Fix a history h such that the condition of uniform convergence in Lemma 2 holds, and note that the set of histories with this property has probability one (henceforth, we omit the history from the notation). In particular, for all η > 0, there exists tη such that, for all t ≥ tη, (6) Lt(θ )− K(θ ,σt) < η for all θ ∈ Θ. Let ¯K(θ ,σ ) ≡ K(θ ,σ )− K∗(σ ). Fix any ε > 0. Using (2) and the facts that 0 ≤ K∗(σ ) (the proof is standard) and K∗(σ ) < ∞ (follows from Assumption 2(iii)) for all σ, we obtain ´ ´ ¯K(θ ,σt)µt+1(dθ ) = = Θ e−tLt (θ )µ0(dθ ) Θ ¯K(θ ,σt)e−tLt (θ )µ0(dθ ) ´ ´ Θ ¯K(θ ,σt)e−t(Lt (θ )−K∗(σt ))µ0(dθ ) ´ Θ e−t(Lt (θ )−K∗(σt ))µ0(dθ ) ´ {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≥ε} {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≤ε/2} ¯K(θ ,σt)e−t(Lt (θ )−K∗(σt ))µ0(dθ ) e−t(Lt (θ )−K∗(σt ))µ0(dθ ) ≤ ε + =: ε + Aε t Bε t . The proof concludes by showing that limt→∞ Aε 14Formally, what we are saying is that it is not generally true that limt→∞ Θ infθ(cid:48)∈Θ(σt )(cid:107)θ − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) µt+1(dθ ) = 0. This type of statement is true in Berk's iid setup and, as the previous discussion suggests, it is also true in our environment under the additional assumption that (σt )t converges. t = 0. t /Bε ´ 10 By (6), there exists tη such that, for all t ≥ tη, ´ Aε t t ≤ Bε ´ {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≥ε} ´ {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≤ε/2} ´ {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≥ε} = e2tη ¯K(θ ,σt)e−t( ¯K(θ ,σt )−η)µ0(dθ ) e−t( ¯K(θ ,σt )+η)µ0(dθ ) ¯K(θ ,σt)e−t ¯K(θ ,σt )µ0(dθ ) e−t ¯K(θ ,σt )µ0(dθ ) . {θ: ¯K(θ ,σt )≤ε/2} Observe that the function x (cid:55)→ xexp{−tx} is decreasing for all x > 1/t. Thus, for any t ≥ max{tη ,1/ε} it follows that ¯K(θ ,σt)e−t ¯K(θ ,σt ) ≤ εe−tε over {θ : ¯K(θ ,σt) ≥ ε}. Thus for all t ≥ max{tη ,1/ε}, Aε t ≤ et2η t Bε e−tε/2 µ0 ({θ : ¯K(θ ,σt) ≤ ε/2}) . (7) (8) In Appendix A.3, we show that continuity of ¯K and compactness of ∆X imply that κε ≡ inf σ∈∆X µ0 ({θ : ¯K(θ ,σ ) ≤ ε/2}) > 0 for all ε > 0. Thus, setting η = ε/8 > 0, (7) implies that, for all t ≥ max{tη ,1/ε}, Aε t t ≤ Bε e−tε/4 κε , which goes to zero as t → ∞. In Section 4, we use Theorem 1 to approximate the agent's belief, µt, with the set of prob- ability measures with support in {θ ∈ Θ : K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt) ≤ δt}, where δt → 0. Therefore, we will be able to study the asymptotic behavior of (σt)t via a stochastic difference equation that only depends on σt and a vanishing approximation error, and not on µt. 4 Asymptotic characterization of action frequencies In this section, we propose a method to study the asymptotic behavior of the frequencies of actions. Among other benefits, one can use the method to determine if behavior converges or not. The key departure from previous approaches in the literature is to focus on the evolution of frequencies of actions. Using the characterization of beliefs in Theorem 1, we write this evolution as a stochastic difference equation expressed exclusively in terms of the frequencies of actions. We then use tools from stochastic approximation developed by Benaïm, Hofbauer 11 and Sorin (2005) (henceforth, BHS2015) to characterize the solutions of this difference equa- tion in terms of the solution to a generalization of a differential equation. We first provide a heuristic description of our approach. The sequence of frequencies of actions, (σt)t, can be written recursively as follows: σt+1 = σt + 1 t + 1 (1(xt+1)− σt) , (9) where 1(xt+1) = (1x(xt+1))x∈X and 1x(xt+1) is the indicator function that takes the value 1 if xt+1 = x and 0 otherwise. By adding and subtracting the conditional expectation of 1(xt+1) (i.e., the probability that each action is played at time t + 1 given the belief at time t + 1), we obtain σt+1 = σt + 1 t + 1 (E [1(xt+1) µt+1]− σt) + 1 t + 1 (cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:124) (cid:125) 1(xt+1)− E [1(xt+1) µt+1] (cid:123)(cid:122) =0 . (10) The last term in equation (10) is exactly equal to zero because the agent chooses pure actions.15 The reason it is hard to characterize (σt)t using (10) is that its evolution depends on the agent's belief. If we could somehow write the belief µt+1 as a function of σt, then we would have a recursion where σt+1 depends only on σt. This is where Theorem 1 from Section 3 is useful. This theorem will allow us to approximate µt+1 with a set of probability measures that depends on σt. The ultimate objective is not really to approximate µt+1 but rather the conditional expec- tation E [1(xt+1) µt+1] in equation (10). The conditional expectation, however, is typically discontinuous in the belief (this is particularly so for a belief under which the agent is in- different between two actions). Thus, replacing µt+1 with a good approximation does not necessarily yield a good approximation for the conditional expectation. We tackle this discon- tinuity issue by replacing the function µ (cid:55)→ E [1(xt+1) µ] with a correspondence that contains this function and is well behaved. To see how this approach works, note that E[1(xt+1) µ] ∈ ∆F(µ) for all µ. Therefore, we 15More generally, if the agent were allowed to mix, this last term is a Martingale difference sequence and essentially adds a noise term to the equation that can be controlled asymptotically in a manner that is standard in the theory of stochastic approximation. Theorem 2 continues to hold as stated, where now ∆F(µ) is a set of compound lotteries, i.e., it is the set of all distributions over actions σ that are induced by some compound lottery z chosen from ∆F(µ), that is, σ (x) = ´ σ∈F(µ) z(σ )σ (x)dσ for each x. 12 can view equation (10) as a particular case of the following stochastic difference inclusion: σt+1 = σt + 1 t + 1 (rt+1 − σt) , (11) where rt+1 ∈ ∆F(µt+1). It is called a difference inclusion because rt+1 can take multiple val- ´ ues. Importantly, we use Theorem 1 to approximate µt+1 with the set of probability measures µ satisfying Θ(K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt))µ(dθ ) ≤ δt, where δt → 0 is a vanishing approximation error. In particular, if the error were exactly zero, the set would be equal to ∆Θ(σt). More gen- erally, the difference equation (11) can be written entirely in terms of (σt)t and approximation errors. A key insight from the theory of stochastic approximation is that, in order to characterize a discrete-time process such as (σt)t, it is convenient to work with its continuous-time inter- polation. Because of the multiplicity inherent in equation (11), we apply the specific methods developed by BHS2015, who extend Benaim (1996)'s ordinary-differential equation method to the case of differential inclusions.16 Set τ0 = 0 and τt = ∑t function w : R+ → ∆X defined as i=1 1/i for t ≥ 1. The continuous-time interpolation of (σt)t is the w(τt + s) = σt + s σt+1 − σt τt+1 − τt , s ∈ [0, 1 t + 1 ). (12) Figure 1 illustrates this simple interpolation for a specific value of x ∈ X. A convenient prop- erty of the interpolation is that it preserves the accumulation points of the discrete process. Equations (11) and (12) can be combined to show that the derivate of w with respect to (a re-indexing of) time, which we denote by w, is approximately given by rt+1 − σt. As ar- gued earlier, rt+1 belongs to a set that depends on σt and an approximation error, and this set is equal to ∆F(∆Θ(σt)). Thus, the derivate approximately takes values in ∆F(∆Θ(σt))− σt. The next step is to replace σt in this last expression by its interpolation w(t). This replacement adds yet another vanishing approximation error, and we therefore obtain, ignoring the approx- imation error, that w(t) ∈ ∆F(∆Θ(w(t)))−w(t). Thus, we can show that the continuous-time interpolation of (σt)t is well approximated by solutions to the following differential inclusion: 16See Borkar (2009) for a textbook treatment of the ordinary-differential equation method in stochastic ap- proximation. σ (t) ∈ ∆F(∆Θ(σ (t)))− σ (t). (13) 13 Figure 1: Example of a continuous-time interpolation. To state the result formally, we first define what we mean by a solution to the differential inclusion. A solution to the differential inclusion (13) with initial point σ ∈ ∆X is a map- ping σ : R → ∆X that is absolutely continuous over compact intervals with the properties that σ (0) = σ and that (13) is satisfied for almost every t. Let ST σ denote the set of solutions to (13) over [0,T ] with initial point σ. The assumption that F is uhc implies that, for every initial point, there exists a (possibly nonunique) solution to (13); see, e.g., Aubin and Cellina (2012). We now state the main characterization result. Theorem 2. Suppose that Assumptions 1-3 hold and let F be an uhc policy correspondence. For any policy f ∈ Sel(F), the following holds P f -a.s.: For all T > 0, 0≤s≤T (cid:107)w(t + s)− σ (s)(cid:107) = 0. inf σ∈ST w(t) (14) lim t→∞ sup Proof. See Appendix A.4. Theorem 2 says that, for any T > 0, the curve w(t + ·) : [0,T ] → ∆X defined by the continuous-time interpolation of (σt)t approximates some solution to the differential inclu- sion (13) with initial condition w(t) over the interval [0,T ] with arbitrary accuracy for suffi- ciently large t. As we will show, this result is convenient because it allows us to characterize asymptotic properties of (σt)t by solving the differential inclusion in (13). 14 w(.)tσ0σ1σ2σ3σ41121314BHS2005 refer to a function w satisfying (14) as an asymptotic pseudotrajectory of the dif- ferential inclusion. They show that the limit set of a (bounded) asymptotic pseudotrajectory is internally chain transitive.17 Thus, one corollary of Theorem 2 is that the frequency of actions converges almost surely to an internally chain transitive set of the differential inclusion. Be- cause the notion of internally chain transitive is fairly complex, in the next section we provide a series of results that help characterize behavior in most common economic applications. 5 Convergence results We now present a series of implications of Theorem 2 that can be readily applied to economic applications. Throughout this section we assume that the agent chooses a policy f that is a selection from F and that Assumptions 1-4 are satisfied. All probabilistic statements are with respect to the corresponding probability measure P f . 5.1 Equilibrium We begin by defining the notion of equilibrium as a stationary point of the differential inclu- sion. Definition 2. σ ∈ ∆X is an equilibrium given a policy correspondence F if σ ∈ ∆F(∆Θ(σ )). If σ is an equilibrium, then there is a solution of the differential inclusion that starts at σ and forever remains at σ. The next result shows that, if the action frequency converges, then it must converge to an equilibrium. In Section 6, we relate this result to previous results in the literature and show that the notion of equilibrium that arises naturally from our approach is more general than notions previously considered. Proposition 1. The following property holds almost surely: If σt converges to some point σ∗, then σ∗ must be an equilibrium. Proof. See Appendix A.5. 17For a definition of an internally chain transitive set, see BHS2005, Section 3.3, Definition VI. 15 5.2 Attracting sets and repelling equilibrium Proposition 1 shows that, if the action frequency σt converges, its limit must be an equilibrium of the differential inclusion. However, this is not a complete characterization of the long- run behavior of the action frequency, for two reasons. First, the proposition applies only to the case in which the action frequency converges. It does not tell us what happens when the action frequency does not converge, and also it is not clear when the action frequency converges. Second, even when the action frequency converges, if there are multiple equilibria, the proposition does not tell us which one will arise as a long-run outcome. In this section, we will introduce two concepts, attracting sets and repelling equilibria, which are useful to make a better prediction about the asymptotic behavior of the action frequency. Let d(σ ,A) denote the distance from a point σ to a set A, that is, let d(σ ,A) = inf σ∈A(cid:107)σ − σ(cid:107). The following definition is standard in the stochastic approximation literature (e.g. BHS2015). Definition 3. A set A ⊆ (cid:52)X is attracting if there is a set U such that A ⊂ intU and such that for any ε > 0, there is T such that d(σσσ (t),A) < ε for any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ U , for any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion, and for any t > T . In this definition, we require uniform convergence, in that as long as the initial value is chosen from U , σσσ (t) is in the ε-neighborhood of A for all periods t > T . Intuitively, this implies that once σσσ (t) enters the ε-neighborhood of A, it will never leave this neighborhood. The largest set U which satisfies the property in this definition is the basin of attraction of A, and we will denote it by UA. A set A is a globally attracting if it is attracting and its basin of attraction is the whole space (cid:52)X. An equilibrium σ∗ is attracting if the set A = {σ∗} is attracting. The following proposition shows that an attracting set appears as a long-run outcome in some sense. Let E denote the set of all equilibria. Proposition 2. The following results hold: (i) If A is globally attracting, then the action frequency σt approaches this set A almost surely: limt→∞ d(σt,A) = 0. In particular, if A is a globally attracting equilibrium, σt converges to that equilibrium almost surely. (ii) Suppose that there are finitely many attracting sets (A1,··· ,AN) such that (cid:52)X is the union of the basins (UA1,··· , UAN ) of these attractors and of the equilibrium set E. Then almost surely, σt approaches the equilibrium set E or one of these attractors: limt→∞ d(σt,E) = 0 or limt→∞ d(σt,An) = 0 for some n. 16 Proof. See Appendix A.6. Recall that in the definition of attracting sets, we require uniform convergence. This prop- erty is crucial in order to obtain Proposition 2. To see this, let www(t) denote the current action frequency. Theorem 2 implies that the motion of the action frequency in the future is approx- imated by a solution σσσ ∈ S∞ www(t) to the differential inclusion for some (long but) finite time T ; but it does not guarantee that the action frequency www is approximated by σσσ forever. So even if all solutions σσσ ∈ S∞ www(t) starting from the current value www(t) converge to some equilibrium σ∗, the action frequency www may not converge there.18 Formally, Theorem 2 implies that, for any T and ε > 0, if t is large enough, then (cid:107)www(t + T )− σσσ (T )(cid:107) < ε for some σσσ ∈ S∞ www(t), so the action frequency www(t + T ) in time t + T is close to the equilibrium σ∗. However, after time t + T , the action frequency www can be quite different from σσσ, and it may move away from the equilibrium σ∗. This suggests that in order to guarantee convergence to σ∗, we need a stronger assumption, and uniform convergence is precisely the property we want. To see how it works, note that Theorem 2 can be applied iteratively, so that the action frequency www from time t + T to t + 2T is approximated by a solution σσσ(cid:48) ∈ S∞ www(t+T ) starting from www(t + T ). As mentioned earlier, this value www(t + T ) is close to the equilibrium σ∗. So if the equilibrium σ∗ is attracting, then www(t + T ) is in the basin of σ∗, and the solution σσσ(cid:48) starting from this point stays around the equilibrium σ∗. This in turn implies that the action frequency www(t + 2T ) in time t + 2T is also close to σ∗. A similar argument shows that www(t + nT ) in time t + nT is close to σ∗ for every n = 1,2,···. The proof of Proposition 2 generalizes this idea and shows convergence to attracting sets.19 Now we apply the result to an example where the action does not converge, but the action frequency does. Example 1. The consequence space is Y = {0,1}. There are two actions, x1 and x2, and the probability that the consequence equals one depends on the action: Q(1 x1) = 3/4 and Q(1 x2) = 1/4. The agent, however, has a misspecified model and believes the consequence does not depend on the action: Qθ (1 xk) = θ ∈ Θ = [0,1] for k ∈ {1,2}, i.e., according to model θ, the probability that the consequence is y = 1 is θ irrespective of the action. The KLD 18This is a so-called "shadowing" problem in the literature on stochastic approximation. See Section 8 of Benaim (1999) for more details. 19Formally, the whole path of www is approximated by a chain of trajectories (σσσ 1,σσσ 2,··· ) where (cid:107)σσσ n(T ) − σσσ n+1(0) < ε, and uniform convergence ensures that this chain of trajectories converges to σ∗. 17 Figure 2: Globally attracting equilibrium (cid:19) + σ (x2) ln 1/4 1− θ 4σ (x1) + 1 function in this case is K(σ ,θ ) = σ (x1) (cid:18)3 4 ln 3/4 θ + 1 4 (cid:18)1 4 ln 1/4 θ + 3 4 ln 3/4 1− θ (cid:19) , ´ and there is a unique minimizer θ (σ ) = 3 4σ (x2). Naturally, the model that best fits the true model is a convex combination of the probability that y = 1 under actions x1 and x2. The payoff function satisfies π(x1,y) = 1 − y and π(x2,y) = y; in particular, the agent θ µ(dθ ) denote the agent's per- prefers action x1 if y = 0 and x2 if y = 1. Letting Eµ [y] ≡ ceived expected value of y, the optimal correspondence satisfies F(µ) = {x1} if Eµ [y] < .5, = {x2} if Eµ [y] < .5, and = {x1,x2} if Eµ [y] = .5. Actions in this example are negatively reinforcing in the sense that doing more of one action makes the agent want to do less of that action. This feature can be seen in Figure 2, where we have plotted σ (cid:55)→ ∆F(∆Θ(σ )). For example, if the agent takes pure action x1, i.e., σ (x1) = 1, then the closest model is θ (σ ) = 3 4, so the agent's belief is degenerate at θ = 3/4, i.e., µ = δ3/4, and she prefers to take action x2, not x1. Similarly, if the agent takes only action x2, she prefers to take action x1. The feature of negatively reinforcing actions is present in several examples in the literature, and previous work has shown that the action does not converge in those examples (e.g., Nyarko (1991), Esponda and Pouzo (2016), Fudenberg, Romanyuk and Strack (2017)).20 We can use 20Negative reinforcement is also present in some of the examples in Spiegler (2016) as well as in the vot- ing environments of Esponda and Pouzo (2017, 2019a) and Esponda and Vespa (2018) and in the investment 18 1σ(x1)σ∗(x1)45oour differential inclusion to go beyond this result and show that the action frequency does converge. In the example, σ∗(x1) = σ∗(x2) = 1/2 is the unique equilibrium point: Given σ∗, the closest model is θ (σ∗) = 1/2, and, given the belief δ1/2, the agent is indifferent between each of the actions in the support of σ∗. Moreover, as Figure 2 shows, for any initial condition, the solutions to the differential inclusion converge to σ∗, and so {σ∗} is a globally attracting set. Proposition 2(i) implies that the action frequency almost surely converges to σ∗. In the next example, we show that the attracting set need not be an equilibrium. Example 2. The consequence space is Y = R3. There are three actions, x1, x2, and x3. Given an action xk, the consequence y follows the normal distribution N(ek,I) where ek ∈ R3 is the unit vector whose kth component is one, and I is the identity matrix. However, the agent does not recognize that the action influences the consequence. Formally, the model space is the probability simplex Θ = {θ = (θ1,θ2,θ3)∑3 k=1 θk = 1, θk ≥ 0 ∀k}, and for each model θ = (θ1,θ2,θ3), the agent believes that y follows the normal distribution N(θ ,I). Assume that for each degenerate belief δθ , the policy F(δθ ) is given as in Figure 3, where the triangle represents the model space Θ. For example, if the current belief puts probability one on the model θ = e1, then the policy F selects the action x2. Figure 3: Policy F(δθ ) for each model θ Figure 4: Differential Inclusion In this example, given a mixed action σ ∈ (cid:52)X, the consequence follows the normal dis- tribution N(σ ,I), so the Kullback-Leibler divergence K(θ ,σ ) has a unique minimizer θ = σ. Accordingly, a solution to the differential inclusion is described as in Figure 4, where the environment of Jehiel (2018). 19 e1(0.9,0,0.1)e2e3(0.1,0.9,0)(0,0.1,0.9)x2x3x11x1x2x32triangle represents the whole action space (cid:52)X and each arrow points to the corresponding vertex in the large triangle. This example has a unique equilibrium, σ∗ = ( 1 3 ). This equilibrium is not attracting. Indeed, starting from any nearby point σ (cid:54)= σ∗, a solution to the differential inclusion moves away from the equilibrium, as described in Figure 5. 3 , 1 3 , 1 On the other hand, the cycle described by the arrows in Figure 6 is attracting. The basin of attraction is the whole space (cid:52)X except the equilibrium point σ∗ = ( 1 3 , 1 3 ). That is, given any initial value σ (cid:54)= σ∗, any solution to the differential inclusion will eventually follow this cycle. (The proof is straightforward and hence omitted. ) 3 , 1 Figure 5: Instability of the equilibrium Figure 6: Limit cycle. Proposition 2(ii) implies that in Example 2, the action frequency σt must converge to the (non-attracting) equilibrium σ = ( 1 3 ) or follow the limit cycle described in Figure 6. But which one is more likely to occur? It turns out that the equilibrium σ∗ in the example above is unstable, in that the action frequency never converges there. So the action frequency follows the limit cycle almost surely. 3 , 1 3 , 1 To see why the equilibrium σ∗ is unstable, suppose that the current action frequency is exactly this equilibrium, i.e., σt = σ∗. Suppose also that the agent chooses some action today, say x1. This changes the action frequency in the next period, and we have σt+1 = 1 t+1δx1 + t t+1σ∗. Note that this new action frequency is slightly different from the equilibrium σ∗. Then starting from this action frequency, a solution to the differential inclusion moves away from the equilibrium (See Figure 5), which implies instability of σ∗. More formally, this equilibrium σ∗ is repelling in the following sense: 20 x1x2x33x1x2x34Definition 4. An equilibrium σ∗ is repelling if there is a natural number T and an open neigh- borhood U of σ∗ such that for any σ ∈ U , for any x ∈ F((cid:52)Θ(σ∗)), and for any β ∈ (0,1), there is β ∈ (β ,1) such that for any σσσ ∈ S∞ , we have σσσ (t) /∈ U for some t ∈ [0,T ]. In Example 2, starting from any nearby point σ (cid:54)= σ∗ of the equilibrium σ∗, the solution to the differential inclusion moves away from the equilibrium σ∗. In such a case, the condition stated in the definition is satisfied, so this equilibrium σ∗ is repelling. βσ +(1−β )δx But our definition of repelling equilibrium is a bit more general. Roughly, an equilibrium σ∗ is repelling if starting from almost all nearby points σ (cid:54)= σ∗ of the equilibrium σ∗, all the solutions to the differential inclusion eventually leave its neighborhood. This is illustrated in the following example: Example 3. We add one more action x(cid:48)3 to Example 2. This new action x(cid:48)3 is redundant, and is identical to the action x3. Formally, the signal distribution given the action x(cid:48)3 is N(e3,I), and the policy F(µ) contains x(cid:48)3 for all µ such that F(µ) contains x3 in Example 2. The agent still believes that the action does not influence the signal distribution. This example has a continuum of equilibria; any mixed action σ with σ (x1) = σ (x2) = σ (x3)+σ (x(cid:48)3) = 1 3 is an equilibrium. Pick one equilibrium σ∗, and pick an open neighborhood U . This neighborhood U contains equilibrium points and non-equilibrium points. The set of equilibrium points is continuous, but has measure zero; so almost all the points in U are non-equilibrium points. Starting from these non-equilibrium points, all the solutions to the differential inclusion leave the neighborhood U , just as described in Figure 5. However, starting from the equilibrium points, a solution to the differential inclusion can stay there forever. So U contains some points from which the solution to the differential inclusion does not leave U . Still, this equilibrium σ∗ is repelling. Indeed, given any point σ ∈ U and given any action x, if we choose β sufficiently close to one, the perturbed point βσ + (1−β )δx is not an equilibrium; so starting from this perturbed point, the solution to the differential inclusion eventually leaves U . The following proposition asserts that repelling equilibria do not arise as long-run out- comes. Proposition 3. If σ∗ is a repelling equilibrium, then the action frequency σt converges to σ∗ with probability zero. Proof. See Appendix A.7. 21 5.3 Convergence to attracting sets for some prior Proposition 2 provides a useful set of conditions under which the action frequency converges to an attracting set, such as the set of equilibria. Moreover, Proposition 3 shows that the frequency cannot converge to repelling equilibria. These propositions, however, do not imply that the action frequency converges to any one specific attracting set or equilibrium (unless it is globally attracting). We will show that if an attracting set A satisfies some additional property, then the action frequency converges to it (i.e., limt→∞ d(σt,A) = 0) with positive probability for some initial prior.21 Throughout this section, let Bε (A) denote the ε-neighborhood of A, i.e., it is the set of all σ such that d(σ ,A) < ε. We first introduce the idea of a "perturbed differential inclusion." Given an initial value σσσ (0), let SSS∞,ε σσσ (0) denote the set of all solutions to the following differential inclusion: (cid:91) σ∈Bε (σσσ (t)) σσσ (t) ∈ (cid:52)F((cid:52)Θ( σ ))− σσσ (t). (15) Recall that in the original differential inclusion, the agent chooses an action from F((cid:52)Θ(σσσ (t))). In (15), this choice set is expanded, so that the agent chooses an action from F((cid:52)Θ( σ )), where σ is a perturbation of the current action frequency σσσ (t). Definition 5. A set A is robustly attracting if it is attracting and there is ζ > 0 and ε > 0 such that for any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Bζ (A), any solution σσσ ∈ SSS∞,ε σσσ (0) to the perturbed differential inclusion never leaves the basin UA; i.e., σσσ (t) ∈ UA for all t ≥ 0. In some special cases, attracting sets and robustly attracting sets are equivalent. For ex- ample, as will be explained in Proposition 7, attracting sets are robustly attracting when Θ is the one-dimensional interval [0,1]. The same result holds when there are only two actions i.e., X = 2. (The proof is straightforward and hence omitted.) However, in general, attracting sets need not be attracting. Such an example can be found in Appendix A.8. A sufficient condition for a set A to be robustly attracting is that the (non-perturbed) dif- ferential inclusion has a contraction property in a neighborhood of A. Formally, let V (σ ) = d(σ ,A), and suppose that there is an open neighborhood U of A such that ( σ −σ )·∇V (σ ) < 0 21Theorem 7.3 of Benaim (1999) gives a sufficient condition for convergence to an attracting set for some prior. This result, however, relies on a technical assumption ((24) in his paper) that does not hold in our environment. Hence we cannot use his theorem and need to develop a new tool. 22 for all σ ∈ U \ A and σ ∈ (cid:52)F((cid:52)Θ(σ )).22 Then this A is robustly attracting.23 Note that this contraction property is satisfied by any strict equilibrium; a pure action δx is a strict equilib- rium if there is an open neighborhood U of δx such that F((cid:52)Θ( σ )) = {x} for all σ ∈ U. So any strict equilibrium is robustly attracting. We will show that the action frequency converges to a robustly attracting set with positive probability, at least for some initial prior. Proposition 4. For each robustly attracting set A, there is an initial prior µ∗0 with full support such that limt→∞ d(σt,A) = 0 with positive probability. Proof. See Appendix A.9. 5.4 Belief convergence when Θ = [0,1] In this subsection, we will focus on a special case in which the model space is the one- dimensional interval Θ = [0,1]. This special case includes most of the current applications in the literature and it allows us to provide a more powerful characterization of the action fre- quency and the belief. Specifically, we will first explain that our differential inclusion reduces to a one-dimensional problem; this reduction considerably simplifies our analysis, because in general the action frequency σ is multi-dimensional and solving the differential inclusion can be a difficult task. Then we will show that the belief converges to an equilibrium belief almost surely, and we will provide a simple characterization of attracting/repelling equilibria. Throughout this subsection, we will impose the following identifiability assumption: Assumption 5. The following two conditions hold: (i) For each σ, there is a unique minimizer of K(σ ,θ ) which we denote by θ (σ ) ∈ [0,1], that is, Θ(σ ) = {θ (σ )}. 22 More generally, A is robustly attracting if there is an open neighborhood U of A and a function V : U → RRR+ such that (i) V (σ ) = 0 if and only if σ ∈ A, (ii) ( σ −σ )·∇V (σ ) < 0 for all σ ∈ U \A and σ ∈ (cid:52)F((cid:52)Θ(σ )), and (iii) ∇V is Lipchitz-continuous. Note that condition (ii) here is a bit more demanding than Lyapunov stability, which requires V (σσσ (t)) < V (σσσ (0)) for all σσσ (0) and σσσ ∈ S∞ 23The proof is as follows. It is obvious that A is attracting, so we will show that the condition stated in the definition of robustly attracting sets is satisfied. Pick ζ > 0 such that B2ζ (A) is in the set U defined above. Let C = B2ζ (A)\ Bζ (A). Since C is compact, ( σ − σ )· ∇V (σ ) < 0 is bounded away from zero uniformly. Then Lipchitz-continuity of ∇V ensures that there is ε > 0 such that ( σ − σ )· ∇V ( σ ) < 0 for all σ ∈ C, σ ∈ Bε (σ ), and σ ∈ F((cid:52)Θ(σ )). This implies that any solution to the ε-perturbed differential inclusion (15) also has a contraction property in the interior of the set C; i.e., if the current action frequency σ is an interior point of C and d( σ ,C) ≥ ε, then at the next instant, the action frequency becomes closer to the set A. This immediately implies that A is robustly attracting. σσσ (0). 23 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)θ =θ (σ ) ∂θ 2 (ii) For each σ with θ (σ ) ∈ (0,1), we have ∂ 2K(σ ,θ ) Part (i) is what we call the identifiability condition, which asserts that for each mixed action σ, there is a unique model which best fits the true world. EP2016 provide a more detailed discussion about this identifiability condition. Note that the best model θ (σ ) is continuous in σ, because Θ(σ ) is upper hemi-continuous in σ, > 0. Part (ii) requires that whenever θ (σ ) is an interior solution (so that the first-order condition is satisfied at the minimum), it satisfies the second-order condition. This technical assump- tion is crucial for the strict monotonicity result (Proposition 5(iii)), which is needed to prove instability of repelling models (Proposition 8). But all other results remain true even if this assumption (ii) is dropped. The following proposition shows that the closest model θ (σ ) is monotone with respect to the action σ. In the proof, we first show that the KL divergence K(σ ,θ ) has the increasing differences property. Then the result follows from the monotone selection theorem of Topkis (1998) and Edlin and Shannon (1998). Proposition 5. Suppose that Assumption 5 holds. Pick any σ and σ, and for each β ∈ [0,1], let σβ = βσ + (1− β ) σ. Then the following results are true: (i) If θ (σ ) = θ ( σ ), then θ (σβ ) = θ (σ ) for all β ∈ [0,1]. (ii) If θ ( σ ) < θ (σ ), then θ (σβ ) is weakly increasing with respect to β . (iii) If θ ( σ ) < θ (σ ), then θ (σβ1) < θ (σβ2) for any β1 and β2 such that β1 < β2 and θ (σβ1) ∈ (0,1). Proof. See Appendix A.10. The monotonicity result above ensures that the motion of the closest model θ (σ ) is char- acterized by a simple, one-dimensional problem. Note that when Θ = [0,1], the best model θ (σ ) can move in only three directions; it can go up, down, or stay the same. In particular, since the motion of the action frequency is approximated by σσσ = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ (σσσ (t))), the monotonicity result in Proposition 5 implies that, at each time t, 24 • θ (σσσ (t)) moves up if θ (σ ) > θ (σσσ (t)) for all σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ (σσσ (t))). • θ (σσσ (t)) moves down if θ (σ ) < θ (σσσ (t)) for all σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ (σσσ (t))). To better understand the motion of θ (σσσ (t)), consider the following example: Example 4. The consequence space is Y = R, and the agent has two actions, x0 and x1. Given an action xk, the consequence y follows the normal distribution N(k,1). The agent does not recognize that the action influences the consequence, and she believes that given a model θ ∈ [0,1], y follows the normal distribution N(θ ,1) regardless of the chosen action. Consider an upper hemi-continuous policy F which satisfies  {x0} 3 )∪ ( 2 if θ ∈ [0, 1 3 , 2 if θ ∈ ( 1 {x1} 3 ) {x0,x1} if θ ∈ { 1 3 , 2 3} 3 ,1] F(δθ ) = . Given a mixed action σ, the consequence follows the normal distribution N(σ (x1),1), so the closest model is θ (σ ) = σ (x1). Hence the motion of θ (σσσ (t)) can be described by the arrows in Figure 7: θ (σσσ (t)) will move up in the middle region (i.e., θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ ( 1 3 , 2 3 )), because the agent chooses the action x1 and the corresponding model is θ (δx1) = 1. For the other region, θ (σσσ (t)) will move down because the agent chooses the action x0 and the corresponding model is θ (δx0) = 0. Figure 7: Motion of θ (σσσ (t)) Using the fact that the closest model θ (σ ) follows the simple rule above, we will now show that it converges almost surely. The intuition is as follows. If the model space is Θ = [0,1] and θ (σ ) follows a recursive rule as in Figure 7, it cannot be cyclic. This implies that θ (σ ) cannot oscillate forever and it must converge. A model θ∗ is an equilibrium model if there is an equilibrium σ∗ such that θ (σ∗) = θ∗. In Example 4, there are three equilibrium models, 0, 1/3, and 2/3. Let Θ∗ ⊆ Θ denote the set of all equilibrium models. Then we have the following result: 25 x0x1θ(σ)=013θ(σ)=1x0235Proposition 6. Suppose that Assumption 5 holds, and that Θ∗ is finite. Then almost surely, limt→∞ θ (σt) exists and limt→∞ θ (σt) ∈ Θ∗. Proof. See Appendix A.11. This proposition, together with Theorem 1, implies that the posterior belief µt converges almost surely, and the limit belief is a degenerate belief on some equilibrium model. When there are multiple equilibrium models, Proposition 6 does not tell us which one will arise as a long-run outcome. To address this concern, we define attracting models as follows. Definition 6. A model θ∗ ∈ [0,1] is attracting if there is ε > 0 such that • θ (δx) ≥ θ∗ for any θ ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗) and for any x ∈ F(δθ ). • θ (δx) ≤ θ∗ for any θ ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε) and for any x ∈ F(δθ ). Intuitively, a model θ∗ is attracting if it is locally absorbing, in that θ (σσσ (t)) moves toward θ∗ in its neighborhood. Indeed, the first bullet point in the definition asserts that if θ (σσσ (t)) is slightly lower than θ∗ in the current period t, then it will go up, and hence be closer to θ∗ at the next instant. Similarly, the second bullet point in the definition ensures that if θ (σσσ (t)) is slightly higher than θ∗ in the current period t, then it will go down. In Example 4, the equilibrium models 0 and 2/3 are attracting, while 1/3 is not. Given an attracting model θ∗, let A = {σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ∗)θ (σ ) = θ∗} be the set of equilibria σ in which the agent has a degenerate belief on θ∗.24 The following proposition shows that this set A is robustly attracting, which means that these equilibria should arise as a long-run outcome at least for some initial prior. Also the proposition shows that the converse is true, i.e., if a set A = {σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ∗)θ (σ ) = θ∗} is robustly attracting, then θ∗ is an attracting model. Proposition 7. Under Assumption 5, for each θ∗, the following properties are equivalent: (a) θ∗ is attracting. (b) The set A = {σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ∗)θ (σ ) = θ∗} is attracting. 24Upper hemi-continuity of F ensures that this set A is non-empty, which in turn implies that any attracting model is an equilibrium model. For the special case in which F(δθ∗) contains only one component, this set A is a singleton. Similarly, even when F(δθ∗) contains only two components, the set A is a singleton for generic parameters. On the other hand, when F(δθ∗) contains three or more actions, the set A is typically continuous. 26 (c) The set A is robustly attracting. Proof. See Appendix A.12. In the same spirit, we define repelling models as follows: Definition 7. A model θ∗ ∈ (0,1) is repelling if θ∗ (cid:54)= θ (δx) for each pure action x ∈ F(δθ∗) and there is ε > 0 such that • θ (δx) ≤ θ∗ − ε for any θ ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗) and for any x ∈ F(δθ ). • θ (δx) ≥ θ∗ + ε for any θ ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε) and for any x ∈ F(δθ ). In words, a model θ∗ is repelling if θ (σσσ (t)) moves away from θ∗ in its neighborhood. Indeed, the first bullet point implies that if θ (σσσ (t)) is slightly below θ∗, it will move down further at the next instant. The second bullet point implies that if θ (σσσ (t)) is slightly above θ∗, it will go up at the next instant. In Example 4, the equilibrium model θ = 1 3 is repelling. In the definition above, we consider only interior models θ ∈ (0,1). This is so because whenever an extreme point θ = 0,1 is supported by some equilibrium (i.e., there is an equilibrium σ such that θ (σ ) = θ), there is a pure-strategy equilibrium δx supporting it. The following proposition shows that if θ∗ is repelling, then any equilibrium in which the agent has a degenerate belief on this model θ∗ is repelling; hence these equilibria do not arise as long-run outcomes. Proposition 8. Under Assumption 5, θ∗ ∈ (0,1) is repelling if and only if it is not supported by a pure equilibrium, there is at least one mixed equilibrium σ∗ with θ (σ∗) = θ∗, and all mixed equilibria σ∗ with θ (σ∗) = θ∗ are repelling. Proof. See Appendix A.12. 5.5 Application: Positively reinforcing beliefs We conclude by applying our results to a large class of economically relevant environments where beliefs are positively reinforcing in the sense that higher beliefs lead to higher ac- tions which in turn lead to higher beliefs. Two examples in this class are Esponda (2008)'s economies with adverse selection, which includes applications to bilateral trade, insurance 27 markets, auctions, and performance pay, and Heidhues, Koszegi and Strack (2018a)'s envi- ronment of an agent whose overconfidence biases her learning about a fundamental, which includes applications to delegation, control in organizations, and public policy choices. In contrast to this work, we are able to derive results without additional restrictive assumptions of a technical nature.25 Without loss of generality, we assume the actions are ordered according to x1 < ... < xX. We then make the following meaningful economic assumptions: • Θ = [0,1] • The identifiability conditions (i)-(ii) in Assumption 5 hold; in particular, let θ (σ ) denote the closest model given σ. • Higher actions lead to higher beliefs: x (cid:55)→ θ (δx) is an increasing function. • Higher beliefs lead to higher actions: Formally, the mapping θ (cid:55)→ F(δθ ) is uhc and satisfies maxF(δθ ) ≤ minF(δθ(cid:48)) for all θ(cid:48) > θ. The first assumption requires a one-dimensional space of models, but it is less restrictive than one might imagine. In applications, θ usually represents the mean of a continuous random variable. But, more generally, the assumption allows for non-parametric models whenever the random variables takes a finite number of values. For example, in Esponda (2008)'s case of a buyer who does not know the distribution over a finite number of product values, v1, ...,vK, a model can be represented by a vector φ = (φ1, ...,φK), where φ j denotes the probability that the value is v j. If the buyer cares about the expected value of the object, we can work with a one-dimensional space by defining the transformation θ = ∑K j=1 φ jv j. The second assumption is an identification condition that says that, no matter the data, there is a unique model that best fits the data. This is a natural assumption in the class of environments we study. Whenever it fails in applications, it is natural to refine beliefs in a manner that the condition holds. In the buyer example, if the buyer decides to offer a price of zero, then no trade happens. Then the buyer does not get any feedback about the value of the product and her beliefs are unrestricted. In this case, it is common to assume that the buyer's belief at a price of zero is the limit, as price goes to zero, of her belief at a positive price, where trade does happen with positive probability. 25Esponda (2008) does not generally tackle the question of convergence; this question is tackled by Heidhues, Koszegi and Strack (2018a), who establish convergence under the assumption that there is a unique equilibrium and that the distribution of noise is log concave. 28 Figure 8: Example of equilibrium with positively-reinforcing actions: The left panel shows the correspondence of optimal actions and the right panel illustrates equilibrium. The third assumption says that the agent's degenerate belief increases with the action. For example, the higher the price offered by the buyer, the higher the quality of products that she trades and, therefore, her belief about the value of the product. The last assumption says that the optimal action increases with the agent's (degenerate) belief. For example, the higher the agent's belief about the value of the object, then the higher the optimal price. The continuity requirement simply says that the agent must be indifferent at beliefs where her behavior changes. The left panel of Figure 8 depicts an example of this property. By definition, θ∗ is an equilibrium model if and only if θ∗ ∈ θ (∆F(δθ∗)). As we show in the proof of the next proposition, the mapping θ (cid:55)→ θ (∆F(δθ )) has the staircase property. An example is depicted in the right panel of Figure 8. In the example, there are three equi- librium models, two of which are attracting (θ∗1 and θ∗3 ) and one of which is repelling (θ∗2 ). The attracting models are associated with a corresponding pure-action equilibrium (x2 and x4, respectively) while the repelling model is associated with a mixed-action equilibrium (a combination of x3 and x4). Our previous results imply that the agent's action converges to a pure-action equilibrium. This is a general feature of this class of environments, as long as pure-action equilibria are strict, a property that is generically true. Proposition 9. If all pure-action equilibria are strict, then the action sequence (xt)t almost surely converges to a pure-action equilibrium. 29 Proof. See Appendix A.14. 6 Relationship to Berk-Nash equilibrium In this section, we relate the notion of equilibrium that arises naturally from the differential inclusion approach to EP2016's definition of Berk-Nash equilibrium. To facilitate the com- parison, we assume that the agent chooses optimal actions, and denote the correspondence of optimal actions by Fβ , where β ∈ [0,1) denotes the agent's discount factor (β = 0 is the case of a myopic agent). The definition of equilibrium that emerges from the differential inclusion approach is that of a probability distribution over actions satisfying σ ∈ ∆Fβ (∆Θ(σ )) = ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ) (see Definition 2). Equivalently, σ is an equilibrium if and only if for every action x in the support of σ there exists a belief µx such that x ∈ Fβ (µx). In contrast, EP2016 define a Berk-Nash equilibrium to be a probability distribution over actions satisfying σ ∈ ∪µ∈∆Θ(σ )∆F0(µ).26 Note that σ is a Berk-Nash equilibrium if and only if there exists a belief µ such that, for every x in the support of σ, x ∈ F0(µ). There are two differences between the definition of equilibrium in this paper and a Berk- Nash equilibrium: A Berk-Nash equilibrium (1) restricts actions to be supported by the same belief; and (2) requires actions to be myopically optimal. These two properties are common in most other standard equilibrium concepts, such as Nash equilibrium. Following Fudenberg and Levine (1993), the first property is known as the unitary-belief property, and puts restric- tions on the set of mixed actions that can constitute an equilibrium.27 The second property is convenient because myopic optimality is easier to characterize than general optimality. We will show that both of these properties are natural provided the following condition holds. Definition 8. The family of models is weakly identified given σ ∈ ∆X if θ ,θ(cid:48) ∈ Θ(σ ) implies that Qθ (· x) = Qθ(cid:48)(· x) for all x such that σ (x) > 0. The definition of weak identification was introduced by EP2016. It says that the belief is uniquely determined along the equilibrium path, but leaves open the possibility of multiple beliefs for actions that are not in the support of σ. Weak identification is immediately satisfied 26This is the definition of Berk-Nash equilibrium for the single agent case; EP2016 also consider the case of multiple agents. 27Fudenberg and Levine (1993) showed that non-unitary equilibria make sense in a game where there are multiple players and, for each player, there is an underlying population of agents in the role of that player, and different agents may have different experiences (hence, beliefs) about other players. 30 if the agent's family of models is correctly specified, but it is also satisfied in many of the applications of misspecified learning in the literature; see EP2016 for further discussion. Proposition 10. Suppose that the family of models is weakly identified given σ. Then ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ) ⊆ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) F0(µ) = ∪µ∈∆Θ(σ )∆F0(µ). Proof. See the Appendix A.15. Proposition 10 implies that, if the agent is myopic, then equilibrium and Berk-Nash equi- librium are equivalent concepts under weak identification. Moreover, if the agent is not my- opic, then the set of equilibria are contained in the set of Berk-Nash equilibria.28 We conclude by relating Proposition 1 in Section 5 to one of the main results in EP2016: They show that, if the sequence of distributions over actions converges, then it converges to a Berk-Nash equilibrium. In our environment there is no motive for mixing, so convergence of the sequence of distributions over actions implies that the actions converge. Propositions 1 and 10 strengthen EP2016's conclusion by showing that, under weak identification, even though actions may not converge, if the action frequency converges, then it converges to a Berk-Nash equilibrium. Of course, the main contribution of this paper is to go beyond the characterization of equilibrium and to provide tools to tackle the question of convergence and stability. 28Of course, if the agent is not myopic, then there might be Berk-Nash equilibria that are not equilibria. This is similar to the idea in the bandit literature that more patient agents might be willing to experiment with actions that myopic agents would not. 31 References Aghion, P., P. Bolton, C. Harris, and B. Jullien, "Optimal learning by experimentation," The review of economic studies, 1991, 58 (4), 621 -- 654. Al-Najjar, N., "Decision Makers as Statisticians: Diversity, Ambiguity and Learning," Econo- metrica, 2009, 77 (5), 1371 -- 1401. and M. Pai, "Coarse decision making and overfitting," Journal of Economic Theory, forth- coming, 2013. Aragones, E., I. Gilboa, A. Postlewaite, and D. Schmeidler, "Fact-Free Learning," Ameri- can Economic Review, 2005, 95 (5), 1355 -- 1368. Arrow, K. and J. Green, "Notes on Expectations Equilibria in Bayesian Settings," Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences Working Paper No. 33, 1973. Aubin, J-P and Arrigo Cellina, Differential inclusions: set-valued maps and viability theory, Vol. 264, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Benaim, M. and M.W. Hirsch, "Mixed equilibria and dynamical systems arising from ficti- tious play in perturbed games," Games and Economic Behavior, 1999, 29 (1-2), 36 -- 72. Benaim, Michel, "A dynamical system approach to stochastic approximations," SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 1996, 34 (2), 437 -- 472. , "Dynamics of stochastic approximation algorithms," in "Seminaire de Probabilites XXXIII," Vol. 1709 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 1 -- 68. Benaïm, Michel, Josef Hofbauer, and Sylvain Sorin, "Stochastic approximations and dif- ferential inclusions," SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2005, 44 (1), 328 -- 348. Berk, R.H., "Limiting behavior of posterior distributions when the model is incorrect," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1966, 37 (1), 51 -- 58. Bohren, J Aislinn, "Informational herding with model misspecification," Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 2016, 163, 222 -- 247. and Daniel N Hauser, "Social Learning with Model Misspecification: A Framework and a Robustness Result," 2018. 32 Borkar, Vivek S, Stochastic approximation: a dynamical systems viewpoint, Vol. 48, Springer, 2009. Bunke, O. and X. Milhaud, "Asymptotic behavior of Bayes estimates under possibly incor- rect models," The Annals of Statistics, 1998, 26 (2), 617 -- 644. Camerer, Colin F and Eric J Johnson, "The process-performance paradox in expert judg- ment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly," Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies, 1997, 342. Easley, D. and N.M. Kiefer, "Controlling a stochastic process with unknown parameters," Econometrica, 1988, pp. 1045 -- 1064. Edlin, Aaron S and Chris Shannon, "Strict monotonicity in comparative statics," Journal of Economic Theory, 1998, 81 (1), 201 -- 219. Esponda, I., "Behavioral equilibrium in economies with adverse selection," The American Economic Review, 2008, 98 (4), 1269 -- 1291. and D. Pouzo, "Berk -- Nash Equilibrium: A Framework for Modeling Agents With Mis- specified Models," Econometrica, 2016, 84 (3), 1093 -- 1130. , "Conditional Retrospective Voting in Large Elections," American Economic Jour- and nal: Microeconomics, 2017, 9 (2), 54 -- 75. , "Retrospective voting and party polarization," International Economic Review, and 2019a, 60 (1), 157 -- 186. and , "Eqilibrium in Misspecified Markov Decision Processes," working paper, 2019b. and E. I. Vespa, "Endogenous sample selection: A laboratory study," Quantitative Eco- nomics, 2018, 9 (1), 183 -- 216. Eyster, E. and M. Rabin, "Cursed equilibrium," Econometrica, 2005, 73 (5), 1623 -- 1672. Eyster, Erik and Matthew Rabin, "Naive herding in rich-information settings," American economic journal: microeconomics, 2010, 2 (4), 221 -- 43. Frick, Mira, Ryota Iijima, and Yuhta Ishii, "Misinterpreting Others and the Fragility of Social Learning," 2019a. 33 , , and , "Stability and Robustness in Misspecified Learning Models," 2019b. Fudenberg, D. and D. Kreps, "Learning Mixed Equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, 1993, 5, 320 -- 367. and D.K. Levine, "Self-confirming equilibrium," Econometrica, 1993, pp. 523 -- 545. Fudenberg, Drew, Gleb Romanyuk, and Philipp Strack, "Active learning with a misspeci- fied prior," Theoretical Economics, 2017, 12 (3), 1155 -- 1189. Gagnon-Bartsch, Tristan and Matthew Rabin, "Naive social learning, mislearning, and unlearning," work, 2017. He, Kevin, "Mislearning from Censored Data: The Gambler's Fallacy in Optimal-Stopping Problems," arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08170, 2018. Heidhues, Paul, Botond Koszegi, and Philipp Strack, "Unrealistic expectations and mis- guided learning," Econometrica, August 2018a, 86 (4), 1159 -- 1214. , Botond Koszegi, and Philipp Strack, "Convergence in Misspecified Learning Models with Endogenous Actions," Available at SSRN 3312968, December 2018b. Hofbauer, J. and W.H. Sandholm, "On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play," Econometrica, 2002, 70 (6), 2265 -- 2294. Jehiel, P., "Limited horizon forecast in repeated alternate games," Journal of Economic The- ory, 1995, 67 (2), 497 -- 519. , "Analogy-based expectation equilibrium," Journal of Economic theory, 2005, 123 (2), 81 -- 104. and F. Koessler, "Revisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expec- tations," Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, 62 (2), 533 -- 557. Jehiel, Philippe, "Investment strategy and selection bias: An equilibrium perspective on overoptimism," American Economic Review, 2018, 108 (6), 1582 -- 97. Kirman, A. P., "Learning by firms about demand conditions," in R. H. Day and T. Groves, eds., Adaptive economic models, Academic Press 1975, pp. 137 -- 156. Liebman, Jeffrey B and Richard J Zeckhauser, "Schmeduling," 2004. 34 Molavi, Pooya, "Macroeconomics with Learning and Misspecification: A General Theory and Applications," 2018. Nyarko, Y., "Learning in mis-specified models and the possibility of cycles," Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 1991, 55 (2), 416 -- 427. Olea, José Luis Montiel, Pietro Ortoleva, Mallesh M Pai, and Andrea Prat, "Competing Models," arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.03809, 2019. Osborne, M.J. and A. Rubinstein, "Games with procedurally rational players," American Economic Review, 1998, 88, 834 -- 849. Rabin, M. and D. Vayanos, "The gambler's and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications," The Review of Economic Studies, 2010, 77 (2), 730 -- 778. Rabin, Matthew, "Psychology and economics," Journal of economic literature, 1998, 36 (1), 11 -- 46. Sargent, T. J., Bounded rationality in macroeconomics, Oxford University Press, 1993. Schwartzstein, Joshua, "Selective attention and learning," Journal of the European Economic Association, 2014, 12 (6), 1423 -- 1452. Sobel, J., "Non-linear prices and price-taking behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1984, 5 (3), 387 -- 396. Spiegler, Ran, "Bayesian networks and boundedly rational expectations," The Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics, 2016, 131 (3), 1243 -- 1290. , "Data Monkeys: A Procedural Model of Extrapolation from Partial Statistics," The Review of Economic Studies, 2017, 84 (4), 1818 -- 1841. Topkis, Donald M, Supermodularity and complementarity, Princeton university press, 1998. Tversky, T. and D. Kahneman, "Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and proba- bility," Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5, 207 -- 232. White, Halbert, "Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models," Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982, pp. 1 -- 25. 35 A Appendix In this appendix, we present the proofs omitted from the text. In some places, we use the fact that θ (cid:55)→ log q(Yx) qθ (Yx) is finite and continuous Q(·x)− a.s. for all x ∈ X. This fact follows from Assumptions 1-2. A.1 Proof of Lemma 1 Continuity of K: For any (θ ,σ ) ∈ Θ×∆X take a sequence (θn,σn)n in Θ×∆X that converges to this point. By the triangle inequality and the fact that K is finite under Assumption 2(iii) it follows that K(θn,σn)− K(θ ,σ ) ≤ K(θn,σ )− K(θ ,σ ) +K(θn,σn)− K(θn,σ ). It suffices to show that both terms on the RHS vanish as n → ∞. Regarding the first term in the RHS, observe that for any σ ∈ ∆X, θ (cid:55)→ log q(YX) qθ (YX) is finite and continuous Q· σ − a.s. Under Assumption 2(iii), by the DCT this implies that θ (cid:55)→ K(θ ,σ ) is continuous for any σ ∈ ∆X. Thus limn→∞K(θn,σ )− K(θ ,σ ) = 0. Regarding the other term in the RHS of the display, observe that under Assumption 2(iii) K(θn,σn)− K(θn,σ ) ≤ ∑ x∈X ´ gx(y)Q(dy x)σn(x)− σ (x) and the RHS vanishes as gx(y)Q(dy x) < ∞ for all x ∈ X. Finally, continuity of K, compactness of Θ (by Assumption 2(ii)) and the Theorem of the Maximum imply that σ (cid:55)→ Θ(σ ) is compact-valued, uhc, and that σ (cid:55)→ K∗(σ ) is continuous. A.2 Proof of Lemma 2 Let (θ ,z) (cid:55)→ g(θ ,z) ≡ log q(yx) O(θ ,ε) ≡ {θ(cid:48) : θ(cid:48) − θ < ε}. qθ (yx), where z = (y,x) ∈ Y × X. For any θ ∈ Θ and any ε > 0, let STEP 1. Pointwise convergence. Fix any ε > 0 and any θ ∈ Θ. For any τ ≥ 0 and history h, let (cid:34) (cid:35) ζτ (h) ≡ sup θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) g(θ(cid:48),zτ (h))− EQ(·xτ (h)) sup θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) g(θ(cid:48),Y,xτ (h)) . The process (ζt)t is a Martingale difference under P f and the filtration generated by {ht ≡ (x0(h),y0(h),x1(h),y1(h), ...,xt(h)): t ≥ 0}, because EP f (·ht ) [ζt(h)] = 0 for all t. De- τ=0 (1 + τ)−1 ζτ (h) for any t ≥ 0. Since (ζt)t is a Martingale difference fine h (cid:55)→ ζ t(h) ≡ ∑t sequence, then (ζ t)t is also a Martingale difference. 36 By the Martingale Convergence Theorem, there exist a H ⊆ H (potentially depending on θ ∈ Θ) and ζ ∈ L2(H,R,P f ) such that P f (H ) = 1 and, for any h ∈ H , ζ t(h) → ζ (h), provided supt EP f < ∞. This condition is satisfied because (cid:104)(cid:0)ζ t(cid:1)2(cid:105) EP f (1 + τ)−2 (ζτ )2 ∑ τ=0 (1 + τ)−2 EP f (cid:104) (ζ t)2(cid:105) (cid:34) t = EP f t ∑ τ=0 t ∑ τ=0 = ≤ (1 + τ)−2 EP f ≤ C max x∈X sup θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) (cid:34) + 2EP f ∑ τ>τ(cid:48) (cid:35) (cid:104) (ζτ )2(cid:105)  (cid:32) (cid:0)g(θ(cid:48),y,x)(cid:1)2 Q (dy x) , θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) sup g(θ(cid:48),y,Xτ ) (cid:35) (1 + τ)−1(cid:0)1 + τ(cid:48)(cid:1)−1 ζτζτ(cid:48)  (cid:33)2 (cid:104) EP f (·hτ ) [ζτ ]ζτ(cid:48) ´ τ=0 (1 + τ)−2 < ∞. By As- (gx(y))2 Q(dy Q (dy Xτ ) (cid:105) = < ∞. By invoking Kronecker Lemma it follows that limt→∞ (1 +t)−1 ∑t τ=0 ζ t = where the second line follows from the fact that, for any τ > τ(cid:48), EP f [ζτζτ(cid:48)] = EP f 0, and where the last line follows from the fact that C ≡ limt→∞ ∑t sumption 2(iii), for any (x,y)∈ X ×Y , supθ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) (g(θ(cid:48),y,x))2 ≤ (gx(y))2 with x) < ∞. Thus, supt EP f (cid:35)(cid:33) 0 P f -a.s. Therefore, we have established that, for all θ ∈ Θ, (cid:104) (ζ t)2(cid:105) (cid:32) (cid:34) t ∑ τ=0 sup (1 +t)−1 lim t→∞ STEP 2. Uniform convergence. Observe that, for any ε > 0 and any θ ∈ Θ, there exists g(θ(cid:48),zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) g(θ(cid:48),Y,xτ ) = 0 P f -a.s. θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,ε) sup δ (θ ,ε) such that (cid:34) EQ(·x) sup θ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,δ (θ ,ε)) (cid:35) g(θ(cid:48),Y,x)− g(θ ,Y,x) < 0.25ε (16) for all x ∈ X. To see this claim, note that, since θ (cid:55)→ g(θ ,Y,x) is continuous Q(·x)− a.s. for (cid:104) (cid:105) all x ∈ X, limδ→0 supθ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,δ )g(θ(cid:48),Y,x)− g(θ ,Y,x) = 0 a.s.−Q(· x) for all x ∈ X. Also, by Assumption 2(iii), supθ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,δ )g(θ(cid:48),y,x)− g(θ ,y,x) ≤ 2gx(y) and gx(y)Q(dyx) < ∞, supθ(cid:48)∈O(θ ,δ )g(θ(cid:48),Y,x)− g(θ ,Y,x) Thus, by the DCT, limδ→0 EQ(·x) Observe that (O(θ ,δ (θ ,ε)))θ∈Θ is an open cover of Θ. By compactness of Θ, there exists = 0 for all x ∈ X. ´ a finite sub-cover (O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε))) j=1,...J(ε). Thus, for all ε > 0, 37 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(1 +t)−1 t ∑ τ=0 sup t t (1 +t)−1 θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) ∑ (1 +t)−1 τ=0 ∑ τ=0 ∑ τ=0 ∑ τ=0 (1 +t)−1 (1 +t)−1 t t j t ∑ τ=0 (cid:0)g(θ ,zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) [g(θ ,Y,xτ )](cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:33) (cid:12)(cid:12)g(θ ,zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) [g(θ ,Y,xτ )] (cid:0)g(θ ,zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) [g(θ ,Y,xτ )](cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(1 +t)−1 (cid:32) (cid:32)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:32)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:32) θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) g(θ ,zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) g(θ ,zτ )− EQ(·xτ ) sup θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) (cid:20) (cid:34) (cid:34) sup sup sup inf θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) EQ(·xτ ) sup θ∈Θ ≤max j ≤max j ≤max j ≤max j + max =I + II. sup θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) g(θ ,Y,xτ )− inf θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) g(θ ,Y,xτ ) (cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:33) (cid:35)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:33) (cid:35)(cid:33) g(θ ,Y,xτ ) g(θ ,Y,xτ ) By Step 1 and the fact that we are adding over a finite number of θ j's, the limit as t → ∞ of the term I is equal to zero P f -a.s. For the second term, note that (16) implies that Since 0 ≤ II ≤ 0.5ε holds for all ε > 0, it follows that II = 0. Therefore, using the definition of g, we have established that II ≤ 2max x∈X sup θ∈O(θ j,δ (θ j,ε)) (cid:18) log (1 +t)−1 lim t→∞ sup θ∈Θ t ∑ τ=0 (cid:20) (cid:12)(cid:12)g(θ ,y,x)− g(θ j,y,x) (cid:20) (cid:12)(cid:12)Q(dy x) ≤ 0.5ε. (cid:21)(cid:19) log = 0 q(yτ xτ ) qθ (yτ xτ ) − EQ(·xτ ) (cid:21) σt(x) = (1 +t)−1 q(Y xτ ) qθ (Y xτ ) (cid:20) EQ(·xτ ) log t ∑ τ=0 (cid:21) . q(Y xτ ) qθ (Y xτ ) P f -a.s. The statement in the lemma then follows by noting that K(θ ,σt) = ∑ x∈X EQ(·x) log q(Y x) qθ (Y x) 38 A.3 Proof of equation (8) in Theorem 1 For simplicity, set k ≡ ε/2 > 0. Continuity of (θ ,σ ) (cid:55)→ ¯K(θ ,σ ) ≡ K(θ ,σ ) − K∗(σ ) (see Lemma 1(i)) and compactness of Θ× ∆X imply that ¯K is uniformly continuous. For any σ, take some θσ ∈ Θ(σ ) (this is possible because Θ(σ ) is nonempty; see Lemma 1(ii)). By uniform continuity of ¯K, there exists δk > 0 such that (cid:107)θσ − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk and (cid:107)σ − σ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk imply ¯K(θ(cid:48),σ(cid:48)) < ¯K(θσ ,σ ) + k = k, where the last equality follows because ¯K(θσ ,σ ) = 0. This implies that for all σ, {θ(cid:48) : (cid:107)θσ − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk} ⊆ {θ : ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)) ≤ k} for all σ(cid:48) ∈ B(σ ,δk) ≡ {σ(cid:48) : (cid:107)σ − σ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk}. Thus, for all σ, µ0({θ : ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)) ≤ k}) ≥ µ0({θ(cid:48) : (cid:107)θσ − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk}) for all σ(cid:48) ∈ B(σ ,δk). The balls {B(σ ,δk)}σ form an open cover for ∆X. Since ∆X is compact, there exists a finite subcover {B(σ i,δk)}n µ0({θ(cid:48) : (cid:107)θσ i − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk}) which is strictly positive by Assumption 3. Take any σ(cid:48), there exists i such that σ(cid:48) ∈ B(σ i,δk); by the previous argument µ0({θ : ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)) ≤ k}) ≥ µ0({θ(cid:48) : (cid:107)θσ i − θ(cid:48)(cid:107) < δk}) ≥ r > 0. i=1. Let r ≡ mini∈{1,...,n} A.4 Proof of Theorem 2 The proof of Theorem 2 consists of three parts. Part 1 defines an enlargement of the set of actions that allows us to adopt the methods developed by BHS2005. Part 2 and 3 correspond to the arguments in the proofs of Proposition 1.3 and Theorem 4.2 in BHS2005, respectively, and we provide them here for completeness. Throughout the proof we fix a history from the set of histories with probability 1 defined by the statement of Theorem 1; we omit the history from the notation. Part 1. Enlargement of the set ∆F(µ). Let S = {a−b a,b ∈ ∆X} and let Ξ : R+×∆X ⇒ S (cid:41) , Ξ(δ ,σ ) = be defined such that, for all (δ ,σ ) ∈ R+ × ∆X, (cid:40) y ∈ S : ∃σ(cid:48) ∈ ∆X, µ(cid:48) ∈ ∆Θ s.t. y ∈ ∆F(µ(cid:48))− σ(cid:48), where M : R+ × ∆X ⇒ ∆Θ is defined such that, for all (δ ,σ(cid:48)) ∈ R+ × ∆X, ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)(dθ ) ≤ δ}, µ(cid:48) ∈ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)),(cid:107)σ(cid:48) − σ(cid:107) ≤ δ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)) ≡ {µ(cid:48) ∈ ∆Θ : Θ where ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))≡ K(θ ,σ(cid:48))−K∗(σ(cid:48)). Note that Θ(0,σ ) = Θ(σ ) and so Ξ(0,σ ) =∪µ∈∆Θ(σ )∆F(µ)− σ. Claim 1: (δ ,σ ) (cid:55)→ Ξ(δ ,σ ) is uhc. Proof. Because S is compact, it suffices to show that Ξ has the closed graph property. For 39 this purpose, we will first show that (δ ,σ(cid:48)) (cid:55)→ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)) is uhc. To establish this claim, note that ∆Θ is compact because of the assumption that Θ is compact. Hence, we will show that M has the closed graph property. Take (µ(cid:48)n)n converging to µ(cid:48) (in the weak topology), (δn)n converging to δ , and (σ(cid:48)n)n converging to σ(cid:48). Suppose that µ(cid:48)n ∈ M(δn,σ(cid:48)n) for all n. We will show that µ(cid:48) ∈ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)). Since (µ(cid:48)n)n converges (weakly) to µ(cid:48) and ¯K(θ ,·) is continuous (see (cid:18) Lemma 1), it follows that (cid:19) lim n ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)n)µ(cid:48)n(dθ )− Θ Θ ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)(dθ ) (cid:18) (cid:18) Θ = lim n + lim n ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)n)µ(cid:48)n(dθ )− ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)n(dθ )− Θ (cid:19) (cid:19) Θ Θ ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)n(dθ ) ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)(dθ ) = 0. ´ Also, since µ(cid:48)n ∈ M(δn,σ(cid:48)n), then on both sides, we obtain Θ ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48))µ(cid:48)(dθ ) ≤ δ , implying that µ(cid:48) ∈ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)). ´ Θ ¯K(θ ,σ(cid:48)n)µ(cid:48)n(dθ ) ≤ δn. Taking limits of this last expression Next, to show that Ξ has the closed graph property, take (yn)n converging to y, (δn)n converging to δ , and (σn)n converging to σ. Suppose that yn ∈ Ξ(δn,σn) for all n. We will show that y ∈ Ξ(δ ,σ ). Since yn ∈ Ξ(δn,σn) for all n, there exists a sequence (µ(cid:48)n,σ(cid:48)n)n such that yn ∈ ∆F(µ(cid:48)n)− σ(cid:48)n, (cid:107)σ(cid:48)n − σn(cid:107) ≤ δn, and µ(cid:48)n ∈ M(δn,σ(cid:48)n). Because the sequence (µn,σ(cid:48)n)n lives in a compact set, ∆Θ× ∆X, there exists a subsequence, (µ(cid:48)n(k),σ(cid:48)n(k))k that converges to (µ(cid:48),σ(cid:48)). By uhc of M and of µ (cid:55)→ ∆F(µ) (due to the assumption that F is uhc), it follows that y ∈ ∆F(µ(cid:48))− σ(cid:48),(cid:107)σ(cid:48) − σ(cid:107) ≤ δ , and µ(cid:48) ∈ M(δ ,σ(cid:48)). Thus, y ∈ Ξ(δ ,σ ). 1 t+1Ξ(δt,σt). Claim 2: There exists a sequence (δt)t with limt→∞ δt = 0 such that, for all t, σt+1 − σt ∈ Proof. By equation (11) in the text, σt+1−σt ∈ 1 t+1 (∆F(µt+1)−σt) for all t. By Theorem Θ ¯K(θ ,σt)µt+1(dθ ) ≤ 1, there exists a sequence (δt)t with limt→∞ δt = 0 such that, for all t, δt. Thus, ∆F(µt+1)− σt ⊆ Ξ(δt,σt) for all t, and the claim follows. Part 2. The interpolation of (σt)t is what BHS2005 call a perturbed solution of the differ- i=1 1/i. Let w be ential inclusion. Define m(t) ≡ sup{k ≥ 0 : t ≥ τk}, where τ0 = 0 and τk = ∑k the continuous-time interpolation of (σt)t, as defined in equation (12) in the text. By Claim 2, for any t, w(t) ∈ σm(t) + (t − τm(t))Ξ(δm(t),σm(t)); hence, w(t) ∈ Ξ(δm(t),σm(t)) for almost every t. Let γ(t) ≡ δm(t) + addition, note that limt→∞ γ(t) = 0 because (δt)t goes to zero, m(t) goes to infinity, and w is the interpolation of (σt)t. (cid:13)(cid:13). Then w(t) ∈ Ξ(γ(t),w(t)) for almost every t. In (cid:13)(cid:13)w(t)− σm(t) ´ Part 3. A perturbed solution is an asymptotic pseudotrajectory (i.e., it satisfies equation 40 (14) in the text). Let v(t) ≡ w(t) ∈ Ξ(γ(t),w(t)) for almost every t. Then w(t + s)− w(t) = 0 s v(t + τ)dτ. (17) Since S is a bounded set, v is uniformly bounded; therefore, w is uniformly continuous. Hence, the family of functions {s (cid:55)→ St(w)(s): t ∈ R} -- where for each (t,s) St(w)(s) = w(s +t) -- is equicontinuous and, therefore, relatively compact with respect to L∞(R,∆X,Leb), where Leb is the Lebesgue measure; all Lp spaces in the proof are with respect to Lebesgue, so we drop it from subsequent notation. Therefore, there exists a subsequence (tn)n and a w∗ ∈ L∞(R,∆X) such that w∗ = limtn→∞ Stn(w). Set t = tn in (17) and define vn(s) = v(tn + s). Then w∗(s)− w∗(0) = lim n→∞ 0 s vn(τ)dτ. Since vn ∈ L∞(R,S) for all n, then vn ∈ L2([0,T ],S). By the Banach-Alouglu Theorem, there exists a subsequence, which we still denote as (tn)n, and a v∗ ∈ L2([0,T ],S) such that (vn)n converges in the weak topology to v∗; therefore, s s 0 pointwise in s∈ [0,T ]. Indeed, convergence is uniform because the family(cid:8)s (cid:55)→ lim n→∞ vn(τ)dτ = v∗(τ)dτ 0 ´ (18) 0 vn(τ)dτ : n ∈ N(cid:9) s is equicontinuous and [0,T ] is compact. In addition, v∗ ∈ L2([0,T ],S), then w∗ is absolutely continuous in [0,T ]. The proof concludes by showing the claim that v∗(τ)∈ ∆F(∆Θ(w∗(τ)))−w∗(τ) Lebesgue- a.s. in τ ∈ [0,T ]. We will prove it by showing that v∗(τ) ∈ Co(Ξ(0,w∗(τ))) Lebesgue-a.s. in τ ∈ [0,T ], where Co denotes the convex hull; the desired claim then follows because the facts that ∆F(∆Θ(σ ))− σ is a convex set and contains Ξ(0,σ ) and, by definition, Co(Ξ(0,σ )) is the smallest convex set that contains Ξ(0,σ ), imply that Co(Ξ(0,σ )) ⊆ ∆F(∆Θ(σ ))− σ. We will prove v∗(τ) ∈ Co(Ξ(0,w∗(τ))) Lebesgue-a.s., in several steps. First, we show that weak convergence of (vn)n to v∗ implies almost sure convergence of a weighted average of (vn)n to v∗. Formally, by Mazur's Lemma, for each n ∈ N, there exists a N(n) ∈ N and a non-negative vector, (αn, ...,αN(n)), such that ∑N(n) i=n αi = 1, and limn→∞(cid:107)¯vn − v∗(cid:107)L2([0,T ],S) = 0 where ¯vn ≡ ∑N(n) k=n αkvn. Therefore, as limn→∞(cid:107)¯vn − v∗(cid:107)L2([0,T ],S) = 0, it follows that limn→∞ ¯vn = v∗ a.s.-Lebesgue. 41 Fix τ ∈ [0,T ] such that the previous claim holds. Define γn(τ) ≡ γ(tn + τ) and wn(τ) ≡ w(tn + τ). By uhc of Ξ at (0,σ ) for all σ (see Claim 1 in Part 1) and the facts that γn(τ) → 0 and wn(τ) → w∗(τ), it follows that, for any ε > 0, there exists Nε such that, for all n ≥ Nε, Ξ(γn(τ),wn(τ))⊆ Ξε (0,w∗(τ)), where Ξε (0,w∗(τ))≡{y(cid:48) ∈ S :(cid:107)y(cid:48) − y(cid:107)≤ ε,y∈ Ξ(0,w∗(τ))}. Recall that vn(τ) ∈ Ξ(γn(τ),wn(τ)) for all n; therefore, ¯vn(τ) ∈ Co(Ξε (0,w∗(τ))) for all n ≥ Nε. Since Co(Ξε (0,w∗(τ))) is closed and lim j→∞ ¯vn(τ) = v∗(τ), it follows that v∗(τ) ∈ Co(Ξε (0,w∗(τ))). Since this is true for all ε > 0, it follows that v∗(τ) ∈ Co(Ξ(0,w∗(τ))). A.5 Proof of Proposition 1 Let σ∗ be an arbitrary non-equilibrium point. Then there is a pure action x such that σ∗(x) > 0 and x /∈ F((cid:52)Θ(σ∗)). Choose such x. By upper hemi-continuity of F (Assumption 4) and Θ(·) (Lemma 1) it follows that there exists a ε > 0 such that x /∈ F((cid:52)Θ(σ )) for all σ ∈ Bε (σ∗) and such that infσ∈Bε (σ∗) σ (x) > 0. Pick such ε > 0. Then there is some T > 0 such that for any initial value in this ε-neighborhood, σσσ (0) ∈ Bε (σ∗) and any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion leaves this neighborhood within time T , i.e., we have (cid:107)σσσ (τ)− σ∗(cid:107) ≥ ε (19) for some τ < T . Such T exists, because the share of the action x decreases whenever σσσ (τ) is in the set Bε (σ∗). Now, pick a sample path h such that the property stated in Theorem 2 holds. We will show 2-neighborhood of σ∗ forever. This completes the proof, because it that σt cannot stay in the ε implies that almost surely, σt cannot converge to any non-equilibrium point σ∗. Pick T such that for any time t > T , ε 2 ∀s ∈ [0,T ] www(t)(cid:107)www(t + s)− σσσ (s)(cid:107) < inf σσσ∈ST Suppose there exists a t > T such that www(t) ∈ B ε (σ∗) (if no such t exists, then the proof is finished because it follows that σt is outside a ε/2 neighborhood of σ∗ for all t > T ). Then from (19) and (20), there is s ∈ [0,T ] such that (cid:107)www(t + s)− σ∗(cid:107) ≥ ε/2. So σt cannot stay in the (ε/2)-neighborhood forever. (20) 2 42 A.6 Proof of Proposition 2 Part (i) directly follows from part (ii). Proof of part (ii): Pick a history from the set of histories with probability one defined by the statement of Theorem 2, and let www denote the interpolation of the action frequency σt given this path. If there is t∗ such that www(t) ∈ E for all t > t∗, the result follows. So we will focus on the case in which for any t∗, there is t > t∗ such that www(t) /∈ E. Pick attracting sets (A1,··· ,AN) as stated. Pick an arbitrarily small ε > 0. Without loss of generality, we assume that for each attracting set An, the ε-neighborhood of An is in the basin of attraction UAn. Pick T large enough that for any attracting set An, for any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ UAn, for any σσσ 2T σσσ (0), and for any s ∈ [T,2T ], d(σσσ (s),An) < ε 2 . Also, pick T large enough that for any t > T and for any s ∈ [0,2T ] inf σσσ∈S2T www(t) (cid:107)www(t + s)− σσσ (s)(cid:107) < ε 2 . (21) (22) Recall that for any t∗, there is t > t∗ such that www(t) /∈ E. This implies that there is t > T and an attracting set An such that www(t) ∈ UAn. Pick such t and An. From (21) and (22), we have d(www(t +s),An) < ε for all s ∈ [T,2T ]. This implies that www(t +s) ∈ UAn for all s ∈ [T,2T ], so applying the same argument iteratively, we have d(www(t + s),An) < ε for all s ≥ T , which means that www will stay in the ε-neighborhood of the attracting set An forever. Since ε can be arbitrarily small, d(www(t)−An) converges to zero as t → ∞. (Note that choosing smaller ε does not influence An.) A.7 Proof of Proposition 3 Let σ∗ be a repelling equilibrium, and pick U and T as in the definition of repelling equilib- rium. Pick a history from the set of histories with probability one defined by the statements of Theorems 1 and 2. Let www denote the interpolation of the action frequency σt given this path. It suffices to show that www(t) does not converge to σ∗ given this history. Pick a sufficiently small ε > 0, so that 2ε-neighborhood of σ∗ is a subset of U . Without loss of generality, we can assume that there is η > 0 such that F(µ) ⊆ F((cid:52)Θ(σ∗)) for any µ 43 ´ such that Pick such η > 0. (K(θ ,σ )− K∗(σ ))µ(dθ ) < η for some σ ∈ Bε (σ∗). (If necessary, take ε small.) From Theorems 1 and 2, there is T∗ and τ∗ such that T∗ = ∑τ∗ i=1 1 i , (K(θ ,στ )− K∗(στ ))µτ+1(dθ ) < η for all τ ≥ τ∗, and inf σσσ∈ST www(t) sup 0≤s≤T(cid:107)www(t + s)− σσσ (s)(cid:107) < ε (23) (24) for all t ≥ T∗. i=1 Suppose that www(t) is in the ε-neighborhood of σ∗ for some t > T∗ such that t = ∑τ 1 i for some τ. We will show that there is t(cid:48) > 0 such that www(t + t(cid:48)) is not in the ε-neighborhood of σ∗. This completes the proof, because it implies that www cannot stay around σ∗ forever. Let σ = www(t) satisfy the condition in the definition of repelling equilibrium. From (23) and the definition of η, the agent chooses some action x ∈ F((cid:52)Θ(σ∗)) in the current period. This means that www(t) moves toward δx during the time t ∈ [t,t + 1 τ+1 ]. Then from the condition in the definition of repelling equilibrium, there is t ∈ [t,t + 1 www(t), we have σσσ (t) /∈ U for some t ∈ [0,T ]. Then as in the previous case, we can show that there is t(cid:48) ≤ T such that (cid:107)www(t +t(cid:48))− σ(cid:107) > ε, as desired. τ+1 ] such that for any σσσ ∈ S∞ A.8 Attracting Sets Need Not Be Robustly Attracting The agent has three actions, x1, x2, and x3. Given an action xk, a consequence y is randomly drawn from Y = R3 according to the normal distribution N(ek,I), so the action influences the mean of the consequence y. However, the agent does not recognize that the action influences the consequence. Her model space is the probability simplex Θ = (cid:52)X, and for each model θ, she believes that the consequence follows the normal distribution N(θ ,I). So given a mixture σ ∈ (cid:52)X, the closest model is θ = σ, i.e., Θ(σ ) = {σ} for each σ. For each degenerate belief δθ , the optimal policy is given as follows. Consider the model space Θ, and choose the points A = ( 2 3 , 1 3 ) as in Figure 9. For each model θ in the interior of the triangle ABσ∗, F(δθ ) = {x2}, i.e., the optimal policy is x2 if the belief puts probability one on some model θ in this triangle. Similarly, the optimal action is x3 for the triangle BCσ∗, and x1 for the triangle CAσ∗. For the point σ∗ and the models outside the triangle ABC, all actions are optimal, that is, F(δθ ) = X 3), and σ∗ = ( 1 3 ,0), C = (0, 1 3), B = ( 1 3, 2 3 ,0, 1 3 , 2 3 , 1 44 for these models θ. For all models on the boundary of the triangles, the optimal policy is chosen in such a way that F(δθ ) is upper hemi-continuous with respect to θ. For example, on the line Aσ∗, F(δθ ) = {x1,x2}. Figure 9: Policy F(δθ ) for each model θ Figure 10: Path starting from a1. In this example, the model θ = σ∗ is an attracting equilibrium, and its basin of attraction is the interior of the triangle ABC. For example, suppose that the action frequency so far is the point a1 = A, and the action x2 is chosen today. Then the new action frequency is an interior point of the triangle ABσ∗, and the agent chooses x2 until the action frequency hits the point b1 = ( 1 6 ) on the line Bσ∗. After that, the agent chooses the action x3 until the action frequency hits the point c1 = ( 2 9 ) on the line Cσ∗; then the agent chooses the action x1 until the action frequency hits the point a2 = ( 5 3 ). From there on, the solution to the differential inclusion takes the path a2b2c2a3b3c3··· and converges to σ∗, where 12 , 1 4 , 1 3 , 1 2 , 1 9 , 1 3 , 4 (cid:33) , 1 3 (cid:32) (cid:18)1 1− (cid:18) 1 3 9b2 n 1 9c3 1 3 − 1 3 − ,1− ,1− 1 3 , n−1 1 9a1 n 1 3 − , , (cid:19) (cid:19) 1 9c3 n−1 1 9a1 n 1 9b2 n . an = (a1 n,a2 n,a3 n) = bn = (b1 n,b2 n,b3 n) = cn = (c1 n,c2 n,c3 n) = See Figure 10. Similarly, starting from any interior points of the triangle ABC, any solution σσσ to the differential inclusion will eventually converge to σ∗. Now we will modify this example in such a way that the equilibrium σ∗ is still attracting but not robustly attracting. Take the points d0, d1, ··· as in Figure 11, that is, d0 is the inter- section point of the line AB and the line passing through σ∗ and C, and for each n ≥ 1, dn is 45 e1Ae2e3BCx2x3x1σ∗6x1A=a1x2x3BCb1c1a2b27the intersection point of the line anbn and the line passing through σ∗ and C. Then take the sequence (z0,z1,··· ) such that z0 = d1, z1 = (d1 for 1, each k ≥ 2. Intuitively, z0z1··· is a "jagged bridge" which connects d1 and d2, whose step size shrinks as it goes. See Figure 12. ), and zk = zk−2+d2 d2 1 +d2 2 2 d2 1 +d2 2 2 ,1− d1 1 − 2 Figure 11: Policy F(δθ ) for each model θ Figure 12: Jagged path. It does not reach d2. Assume that for each model θ on this bridge z0z1z2···, the optimal policy is F(δθ ) = {x1,x2}. Then starting from any point on this bridge z0z1···, a solution σσσ to the differential inclusion can move along this bridge and reach the point d1. However, starting from the point d2, σσσ cannot move to d1; this is so because for every large n, zn is slightly different from d2, which means that the bridge z0z1··· do not reach the point d2 exactly. Accordingly, the asymptotic motion of σσσ is the same as before, i.e., as long as the starting point is in the interior of the triangle ABC, σσσ converges to σ∗. The same is true even if we add more bridges. Suppose that for each n, there is a jagged path from dn toward dn+1. Even with this change, σ∗ is still attracting, for example, starting from the point b1, σσσ must follow the path b1c1a2b2c2··· and eventually converge to σ∗. However, adding these bridges significantly changes the solution σσσ to the perturbed dif- ferential inclusion. Indeed, starting from the point dn, σσσ can move to dn−1 through the jagged path, because this path is ε-close to the point dn for any small ε. For the same reason, σσσ can move to dn−2, dn−3, ···, and can eventually reach the point d0, which is outside of the basin of σ∗. This implies that σ∗ is not robustly attracting with these bridges. 46 x1A=a1x2x3BCd0d1d28z0=d1d2z1z2z3z4z5z69A.9 Proof of Proposition 4 We will first present a few preliminary results. We have seen in Lemma 2 that given any initial prior µ0 and given any policy f , there is T such that with positive probability, the consequence frequency is close to the mean (more formally, the sample average of the likelihood Lt is close to the mean) for all periods after T . The following claim shows that this T can be chosen independently of µ0 and f . The proof can be found at the end. Claim 1. For any η > 0, there is T and q > 0 such that for any initial prior µ0 with full support and for any f , P f (∀t ≥ T∀θ Lt(θ )− K(θ ,σt) < η) > q. (25) The next claim just summarizes what we have seen in the proof of Theorem 1: It shows that if the past consequence frequency is close to the mean as stated in the above claim, and if the initial prior µ0 satisfies some technical condition, then the posterior belief µt+1 concentrates on the states which approximately minimize K(θ ,σt) for large t. Claim 2. For any η > 0 and for any κ > 0, there is T such that for any initial prior µ0 and 4}) ≥ κ, for any t > T such that Lt(θ )− K(θ ,σt) < 16 and µ0({θ : K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt) ≤ η η (K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt))µt+1(dθ ) < η. Proof. Directly follows from the proof of Theorem 1. The next claim shows that if the posterior belief µt+1 is concentrated as stated in the above claim then the motion of the action frequency σt is described by the perturbed differential inclusion. A difference from Theorem 2 is that here the motion of the action frequency www exactly matches a solution to the perturbed differential inclusion. In contrast, in Theorem 2, we take the limit as t → ∞, so a solution to the differential inclusion is an approximation of the action frequency www. Claim 3. Let F be an uhc policy correspondence. Then for any ε > 0, there is η > 0 such that given a sample path h, for any t > 1 (K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt))µt(dθ ) < η, there is σσσ ∈ SSS∞,ε t+1], where T = ∑t Proof. Pick ε > 0 arbitrarily. It is sufficient to show that there is η > 0 such that for any σ and for any µ such that (σ ) such that F(µ) ⊆ F((cid:52)Θ( σ )). (K(θ ,σ ) − K∗(σ ))µ(dθ ) < η, there is σ ∈ B ε www(T ) such that www(T + s) = σσσ (s) for all s ∈ [0, 1 ε such that ´ ´ 1 τ . τ=1 2 47 ´ Note that for each σ, there is εσ < ε and ησ such that F(µ) ⊆ F((cid:52)Θ(σ )) for all µ such (K(θ , σ ) − K∗( σ ))µ(dθ ) < ησ for some σ ∈ Bεσ (σ ). Since (cid:52)X is compact, there (σ1),··· ,BεσM (σM)}. Let η = minm ησm > 0. This η satisfies the (K(θ ,σ )− K∗(σ ))µ(dθ ) < η, if we that is a finite subcover {Bεσ1 property we want. Indeed, for any σ and µ such that set σ = σm such that σ ∈ Bεσm (σm), we have F(µ) ⊆ F((cid:52)Θ( σ )). ´ The next claim shows that to prove convergence to an attracting set A, it suffices to show that σt visits the basin of A infinitely often with positive probability. Claim 4. Suppose that given an initial prior µ0 and a policy f , σt visits the basin of A infinitely often with positive probability, i.e., P f (∀T∃t > T σt ∈ UA) > 0. Then P f (limt→∞ d(σt,A) = 0) > 0. Proof. Let H be the set of all h which satisfies the property stated in Theorem 1. Note H be the set of all h such that σt visits the basin of A infinitely that P f (H ) = 1. Also, let often, i.e., it is the set of all h such that for any T , there is t > T such that σt ∈ UA. Let H ∗ = H ∩ H . By the assumption, we have P f (H ∗) = P f ( Pick a sample path h ∈ H ∗. To prove the claim, it suffices to show that limt→∞ d(σt,A) = 0 given this path. Pick an arbitrary ε > 0. Without loss of generality, we assume that Bε (A) is in the basin of attraction UA. H ) > 0. Pick T large enough that (21) holds for any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ UA, for any σσσ ∈ S2T σσσ (0), and for any s ∈ [T,2T ]. Also, pick T large enough that (22) holds for any t > T and for any s ∈ [0,2T ]. Since σt visits UA infinitely often, there is t > T such that www(t) ∈ UA. Pick such t. Then as in the proof of Proposition 2(ii), we can show that www will stay in the ε-neighborhood of the set A forever. Since ε can be arbitrarily small, limt→∞ d(www(t),A) = 0. Now we will prove the proposition. Let A be a robustly attracting set, and let ζ > 0 be such that Bζ (A) ⊂ UA. Let ζ and ε be as in the definition of robustly attracting set. Then pick η as in Claim 3, pick an arbitrary κ > 0, and pick T as stated in Claim 2. Pick t∗ large enough that 1 t∗ < ε and t∗ t∗ + T σ + T t∗ + T σ ∈ Bζ (A) (26) (A) and σ ∈ (cid:52)X. Now, consider the following hypothetical situation: for all σ ∈ B ζ (a) The initial prior is µ0 such that µ0({θ : K(θ ,σ ) − K∗(σ ) ≤ η 4}) > κ for all σ. The 2 current period is t∗ + 1. 48 (b) The action frequency in the past is close to A, in that σt∗ ∈ B ζ η 16 for all θ.29 (c) The past observation is close to the mean, in that Lt∗(θ )− K(θ ,σt∗) < Let ht∗ be a history which satisfies all the properties above. (Given a policy f , the probability of such a history ht∗ may be zero, but this does not affect the following argument.) Let H be the set of histories such that the history during the first t∗ periods is exactly ht∗ and (A). 2 Lt∗+1,t(θ )− K(θ ,σt∗+1,t) < η 16 (27) for all t ≥ t∗ + T , where Lt∗+1,t is the sample average of the likelihood from period t∗ + 1 to period t, and σt∗+1,t is the action frequency from period t∗ + 1 to period t. From Claim 1, we know P f (H ht∗) > q. Pick a path h ∈ H . We claim that given this path, σt never leaves the basin of A after period t∗. The proof can be found at the end. Claim 5. For each path h ∈ H , σt ∈ UA for all t > t∗. Let µ∗ be the posterior belief induced by the initial prior µ0 and the history ht∗ above. Now, consider a new game in which the agent's initial prior is µ∗. Since the agent's action is determined by the belief, her play in this new game is exactly the same as her play in the continuation game induced by the initial prior µ0 and the history ht∗. So Claim 5 implies that in this new game, with positive probability, the action frequency σt will stay in the basin UA in all periods t > T , where T is a sufficiently large number. (This is so because the action frequency σt∗ during the first t∗ periods has almost no impact on the action frequency σt for large t.) Then Claim 4 implies that in this new game, the action frequency σt converges to A with positive probability. A.9.1 Proof of Claim 1 Let Px denote the probability distribution of the histories h = (xt,yt)∞ x every period, t=1 when the agent chooses Claim 6. For any η > 0, there is T such that for any action x, 29Claim 1 ensures that this condition can be satisfied by some consequence sequence. Px(∀t ≥ T∀θ Lt(θ )− K(θ ,x) < η) > 0 49 Proof. Pick any η > 0. From Lemma 2, limT→∞ Px(∀t ≥ T∀θ This implies the result we want. Lt(θ )− K(θ ,x) < η) = 1. tσt (x) ∑t τ=1 1{xτ =x} log q(ytxt ) Now we will prove Claim 1. Let Lt(θ ,x) = 1 qθ (ytxt ) be the sample average of the likelihood ratio, where the sample is taken from the periods in which the agent chooses x. Note that we have Lt(θ ) = ∑x∈X σt(x)Lt(θ ,x). Pick η > 0 arbitrarily, and pick T as in the above claim. Let H be the set of histories h such that Lt(θ ,x)−K(θ ,x) < η for all x and t such that tσt(x) > T . Then there is q > 0 such that P f (H ) > q for any initial prior µ0 and any policy f . Pick an arbitrary h ∈ H , and let ξ > 0 be such that (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) < ξ for all x, qθ (yx) − log q( yx) qθ ( yx) θ, y, and y. Then we have Lt(θ ,x)− K(θ ,x) < (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)log q(yx) (cid:40) η if tσt(x) > T ξ otherwise for all x, θ, and t. This implies that σt(x)Lt(θ ,x) − K(θ ,x) < max{η, Tξ t > T∗ ≡ Tξ ε , we have σt(x)Lt(θ ,x)− K(θ ,x) < η. Hence for any t > T∗, σt(x)Lt(θ ,x)− K(θ ,x) < η. Lt(θ )− K(θ ,σt) ≤ ∑ x∈X t }. So for any Since K and T∗ are chosen independently of h ∈ H , this implies the result we want. A.9.2 Proof of Claim 5 Pick h as stated. From (b) and (26), we have σt ∈ Bζ (A) ⊆ UA for all t ∈ {t∗ + 1,··· ,t∗ + T}, regardless of the agent's play during these periods. So what remains is to show that σt ∈ UA for all t > t∗ + T . From (27), (a), (c), and Claim (K(θ ,σt)− K∗(σt))µt+1(dθ ) < η for all t ≥ t∗ + T . Then Claim 3 implies that 2, we have the motion of the action frequency after period t∗ + T is described by some solution to the ε-perturbed differential inclusion. Since σt+T∗ ∈ Bζ (A) and σ∗ is robustly attracting, we have σt ∈ Bζ (A) ⊆ UA for all t ≥ t∗ + T . ´ A.10 Proof of Proposition 5 We will start with a useful lemma, which shows that Assumption 5 essentially requires single- peakedness of the Kullback-Leibler divergence K(θ ,δx). Let θ = minσ∈(cid:52)X θ (σ ), and let 50 θ = maxσ∈(cid:52)X θ (σ ). Then we have the following lemma. The proof can be found at the end. Lemma 1. If Assumption 5 holds, then for each action frequency σ, the Kullback-Leibler divergence K(θ ,σ ) is single-peaked with respect to θ in [θ ,θ ], that is, we have K(θ ,σ ) > K( θ ,σ ) for each θ ∈ [θ ,θ (σ )) and θ ∈ (θ ,θ (σ )], and K(θ ,σ ) < K( θ ,σ ) for each θ ∈ [θ (σ ),θ ) and θ ∈ (θ ,θ ]. Proof of Lemma 1: We first prove the following claim: Claim 7. Under Assumption 5, for each σ and σ such that θ (σ ) > θ ( σ ), K(θ ,σ ) is strictly decreasing with respect to θ in [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )], and K(θ , σ ) is strictly increasing with respect to θ in [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )]. Proof. Pick σ and σ as stated. For each β ∈ [0,1], let σβ = βσ + (1− β ) σ. We will prove only that K(θ ,σ ) is strictly decreasing with respect to θ on [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )]. Suppose not, so that there is θ(cid:48), θ(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )] such that θ(cid:48) < θ(cid:48)(cid:48) and K(θ(cid:48),σ ) ≤ K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σ ). We consider the following two cases. Case 1: K(θ(cid:48), σ ) ≤ K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48), σ ). In this case, K(θ(cid:48),σβ ) ≤ K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σβ ) for all β , so θ(cid:48)(cid:48) cannot be the unique minimizer of K(θ ,σβ ), i.e., θ (σβ ) (cid:54)= θ(cid:48)(cid:48) for all β . But this is a contradiction, because θ (σβ ) is continuous in β and θ (σ0) ≤ θ(cid:48)(cid:48) ≤ θ (σ1). Case 2: K(θ(cid:48), σ ) > K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48), σ ). Let β(cid:48) be such that θ (σβ(cid:48)) = θ(cid:48). Then we have K(θ(cid:48),σβ(cid:48)) < K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σβ(cid:48)), which is equivalent to β(cid:48)(K(θ(cid:48),σ )− K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σ )) < (1− β(cid:48))(K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48), σ )− K(θ(cid:48), σ )). Then for all β ≥ β(cid:48), β (K(θ(cid:48),σ )− K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σ )) < (1− β )(K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48), σ )− K(θ(cid:48), σ )), which implies K(θ(cid:48),σβ ) < K(θ(cid:48)(cid:48),σβ ). So θ (σβ ) (cid:54)= θ(cid:48)(cid:48) for all β ≥ β(cid:48). But this is a contradic- tion, because θ (σβ ) is continuous in β and θ (σβ(cid:48)) < θ(cid:48)(cid:48) < θ (σ1). Pick an arbitrary σ∗. We will show that the Kullback-Leibler divergence K(θ ,σ∗) is single-peaked in [θ ,θ ]. First, consider the case in which θ (σ∗) = θ. Let σ = σ∗, and let σ be such that θ (σ ) = θ. Then from the claim above, K(θ ,σ∗) is strictly increasing with respect to θ in [θ ,θ ], which implies single-peakedness. Next, consider the case in which θ (σ∗) < θ. Let σ = σ∗, and let σ be such that θ (σ ) = θ. Then from the claim above, K(θ ,σ∗) is strictly increasing with respect to θ in [θ (σ∗),θ ]. 51 Similarly, letting σ = σ∗ and σ be such that θ ( σ ) = θ, the claim above implies that K(θ ,σ∗) is strictly decreasing with respect to θ in [θ ,θ (σ∗)]. Hence K(θ ,σ∗) is single-peaked. Proof of Proposition 5: Part (i): A standard algebra shows that K(θ ,σβ ) = β K(θ ,σ ) + (1− β )K(θ , σ ) for each θ. Then the result follows immediately. Part (ii): We first show that θ (σβ ) ≥ θ ( σ ) for all β . Suppose not so that there is β1 ∈ (0,1) such that θ (σβ1) < θ ( σ ). Then since θ (σβ ) is continuous in β and θ (σβ1) < θ ( σ ) < θ (σ1), there must be some β2 such that β1 < β2 < 1 and θ (σβ2) = θ ( σ ). But then from part (i), we have θ (σβ ) = θ ( σ ) for all β ∈ [0,β2], and in particular θ (σβ1) = θ ( σ ). This is a contradiction. Similarly, we can show that θ (σβ ) ≤ θ (σ ) for all β . Taken together, we have θ (σβ ) ∈ [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )] for all β . Now, from Claim 7 in the proof of Lemma 1, K(θ ,σ ) has increasing differences, in that ∂ 2K(θ ,σ ) ∂θ∂β = ∂ K(θ ,σ ) ∂ K(θ , σ ) ∂θ − ∂θ ≥ 0. for all β and θ ∈ [θ ( σ ),θ (σ )]. So the monotone selection theorem of Topkis implies the result we want. Part (iii): Pick β1 and β2 as stated. Let θ∗ = θ (σβ1). This θ∗ is an interior solution, so it must solve the first-order condition = 0, which is equivalent to ∂ K(θ∗,σβ1 ) ∂θ β1 ∂ K(θ∗,σ ) ∂θ + (1− β1) ∂ K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ = 0. (28) We claim that each term in the left-hand side is non-zero: Claim 8. ∂ K(θ∗,σ ) ∂θ (cid:54)= 0. ∂θ = 0. Then from (28), we have ∂ K(θ∗, σ ) Proof. Suppose not so that ∂ K(θ∗,σ ) satisfies the first-order condition for σ and σ. Then we must have ∂ 2K(θ∗,σ ) not and ∂ 2K(θ∗,σ ) single-peakedness of K(θ ,σ ). Similarly we have ∂ 2K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ = 0, that is, θ∗ ∂θ 2 ≥ 0. Indeed, if ∂θ 2 < 0, θ∗ becomes the local maxima for K(θ ,σ ), which contradicts with the ∂θ 2 ≥ 0 Also, from Assumption 5, we know that the second-order condition, ∂ 2K(θ∗,σβ1 ) ∂θ 2 > 0, is 52 satisfied for σβ1, which is equivalent to β1 ∂ 2K(θ∗,σ ) ∂θ 2 + (1− β1) ∂θ 2 > 0 or ∂ 2K(θ∗, σ ) ∂ 2K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ 2 > 0. ∂θ 2 ≥ 0, we have ∂ K(θ∗,σβ ) ∂ 2K(θ∗,σβ ) ∂θ 2 > 0. Suppose for now that ∂ 2K(θ∗,σ ) This inequality implies ∂ 2K(θ∗,σ ) (The argument for the case with ∂ 2K(θ∗, σ ) ∂ 2K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ 2 > 0. ∂θ 2 > 0 is symmetric, so we will omit it.) Then since > 0 for all β (cid:54)= 0. Also, since ∂ K(θ∗,σ ) = 0, = 0 for all β . So θ∗ satisfies both the first-order and the second-order we have conditions, which implies that θ (σβ ) = θ∗ for all β (cid:54)= 0. Then since θ (σβ ) is continuous in β , we have θ (σβ ) = θ∗ for all β ∈ [0,1]. But this is a contradiction, because we have θ ( σ ) < θ (σ ). ∂θ 2 ∂θ = ∂ K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ ∂θ The above claim and (28) imply that ∂ K(θ∗,σβ2) ∂θ = β2 ∂ K(θ∗,σ ) ∂θ + (1− β2) ∂ K(θ∗, σ ) ∂θ (cid:54)= 0, which means that θ∗ cannot be the optimal solution for β2. (Note that θ∗ is an interior value, so the first-order condition is necessary for it to be optimal.) Then from part (ii), the result follows. A.11 Proof of Proposition 6 Let Θ∗∗ be the union of the equilibrium models and the boundary points, that is, Θ∗∗ = Θ∗ ∪ {0,1}. Since Θ∗ is finite, it can be written as Θ∗∗ = {θ0,θ1,··· ,θN} where 0 = θ0 < ··· < θN = 1. We first show that each interval (θn,θn+1) has a useful property. Lemma 3. Each interval (θn,θn+1) must satisfy one of the following properties: (i) For each θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) and for each x ∈ F(δθ ), we have θ (δx) > θ. (ii) For each θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) and for each x ∈ F(δθ ), we have θ (δx) < θ. Proof. If there is θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) such that θ (δx) = θ for some x ∈ F(δθ ), then this θ is an equilibrium model, which is a contradiction. So such θ does not exist. 53 Similarly, if there is θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) such that θ (δx) < θ < θ (δ x) for some x, x ∈ F(δθ ), then there is a mixture σ of x and x such that θ (σ ) = θ, which implies that θ is a mixed-strategy equilibrium model. So again such θ does not exist. Accordingly, (θn,θn+1) must be the union of the two sets, Θ1 and Θ2: Θ1 is the set of all θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) such that θ (δx) > θ for all x ∈ F(δθ ). Θ2 is the set of all θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) such that θ (δx) < θ for all x ∈ F(δθ ). However, since F(δθ ) is upper hemi-continuous in θ, one of these sets must be empty. This implies the result. Next, we characterize how the KL minimizer θ (σt) changes over time, when the motion of σt is determined by the differential inclusion. Consider an interval (θn,θn+1) which satisfies property (i) in the lemma above. Pick a solution σσσ to the differential inclusion, and suppose that θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θn,θn+1) in the current period t. Then from property (i), the agent will choose an action x such that θ (δx) > θ (σσσ (t)), which means that θ (σσσ (t)) should move up and even- tually reaches (a neighborhood of) θn+1. Also, once θ (σσσ (t)) goes above θn+1, it cannot be lower than θn+1 in any later period. Formally, we have the following result: Lemma 4. Suppose that the interval (θn,θn+1) satisfies property (i) stated in Lemma 3. Then for any ε > 0, there is T > 0 such that given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) > θn and given any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion, we have θ (σσσ (t)) > θn+1 − ε for all t ≥ T . Proof. Let X∗ = ∪θ∈(θn,θn+1)F(δθ ). We first consider the special case in which θ (δx) ≥ θn+1 for all x ∈ X∗. Then we will explain how to extend the proof for a general case. Case 1: θ (δx) ≥ θn+1 for all x ∈ X∗. Let X be the set of all mixed strategies σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θn+1. From Proposition 5(ii), this set is convex. Similarly, the set (cid:52)X \ X is convex. So there is a hyperplane H which separates these two sets; i.e., there is a vector λ ∈ RX and k ∈ R such that λ · σ ≥ k for all σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θn+1, and λ · σ < k for all σ such that θ (σ ) < θn+1. From Proposition 5(ii), for any σ ∈ (cid:52)X∗, we have θ (σ ) ≥ θn+1 and hence λ · σ ≥ k. Pick an arbitrary solution σσσ to the differential inclusion. Pick any time t such that θ (σσσ (t))∈ (θn,θn+1). Then we have σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ ∈ (cid:52)X∗, and also we have λ · σσσ (t) = λ · (σ − σσσ (t)) ≥ k− λ · σσσ (t) > 0. 54 (29) (30) The first equation (29), together with Proposition 5(ii), implies that θ (σσσ (t)) weakly increases as time goes for all these t. That is, if θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θn,θn+1) in the current time t, then we have θ (σσσ (t +η)) ≥ θ (σσσ (t)) at the next instant t +η. The second equation (30) implies that λ · σσσ (t) strictly increases as time goes. So σσσ (t) moves toward the hyperplane H if θ (σσσ (t))∈ (θn,θn+1) in the current time t. These observations immediately imply the result we want. Pick an arbitrary ε > 0, and let ε > 0 be such that θ (σ ) > θn+1−ε for all σ such that λ ·σ > k− ε. Pick T large enough that (31) εT > k− λ · σ for all σ. From (30), if λ · σσσ (t) > k − ε in the current period t, we have λ · σσσ (t) ≥ ε that is, λ · σσσ (t) increases at a rate at least ε. Then from (31), given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) > θn, there is t < T such that λ · σσσ (t) > k − ε, which implies θ (σσσ (t)) > θn+1 − ε. Also (29) implies that after this time t, θ (σσσ (t)) cannot fall below θn+1 − ε, that is, θ (σσσ (t)) > θn+1 − ε for all t > t. This implies the result, because t < T . Case 2: θ (δx) < θn+1 for some x ∈ X∗. Let X∗∗ = {x1,x2,··· ,xM} denote the set of all x ∈ X∗ such that θ (δx) < θn+1. For each action xm, let ξm denote the maximal value of θ ∈ (θn,θn+1) such that xm ∈ F(δθ ). Note that the maximum exists, because F is upper hemi-continuous. Also, by the assumption, we have ξm < θ (δxm). Without loss of generality, assume that θn < ξ1 ≤ ξ2··· ≤ ξM < θn+1. Then we can show that there is T1 such that given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) ∈ (θ1,ξ1] and given any solution σσσ to the differential inclusion, we have θ (σσσ (t)) > ξ1 for some time t < T1. The proof is very similar to the argument in the previous case: Let λ1 and k1 be such that λ1·σ ≥ k1 for all θ (σ ) ≥ θ (δx1) and λ1·σ < k1 for all θ (σ ) < θ (δx1). Then for any t such that θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θn,ξ1], we have σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ ∈ (cid:52)X∗, and also λ1 · σσσ (t) = λ1 · (σ − σσσ (t)) > k1 − λ1 · σσσ (t) > 0. Note that k1−λ1·σσσ (t) is bounded away from zero uniformly in σσσ (t) with θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θn,ξ1], because property (i) in Lemma 3 ensures θ (δxm) > ξm for each m. This immediately implies the existence of T1. Similarly, there is T2 such that given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) ∈ (ξ1,ξ2] and given any solution σσσ to the differential inclusion, we have θ (σσσ (t)) > ξ2 for some time t < T2. Again the proof is very similar to the argument in Case 1; the only difference is that here we use the fact that the action x1 is never chosen when θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (ξ1,ξ2]. 55 We iterate this process and define T1, T2, ···, TM. Also, pick an arbitrarily small ε > 0, and let TM+1 be such that given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) ∈ (ξM,θn+1) and given any solution σσσ to the differential inclusion, we have θ (σσσ (t)) > θn+1 − ε for some time t < TM+1. Then let T = T1 +··· + TM+1. This (ε,T ) obviously satisfies the property stated in the lemma. The next lemma relates the result in the previous lemma to the motion of θ (www(t)), where www(t) is the actual frequency. It shows that if θ (www(t)) visits the interval (θn,θn+1) infinitely often, then after a long time, θ (www(t)) cannot be less than θn+1. That is, θ (www(t)) cannot move against the solution to the differential inclusion in the long run. Lemma 5. Consider an interval (θn,θn+1) which satisfies property (i) in Lemma 3. Pick a sample path h such that the property stated in Theorem 3 is satisfied and such that θ (www(t)) exceeds θn infinitely often, i.e., for any T > 0, there is t > T such that θ (www(t)) > θn. Then liminft→∞ θ (www(t)) ≥ θn+1. Proof. The proof is very similar to that of Proposition 2(ii). Pick (θn,θn+1) and h as stated. Pick an arbitrarily small η > 0. Then pick ε > 0 such that θ (σ ) > θn+1 − η for all σ such that (cid:107)σ − σ(cid:107) < ε for some σ with θ ( σ ) > θn+1 − η 2 . From Lemma 4, there is T > 0 such that given any initial value σσσ (0) with θ (σσσ (0)) > θn and given any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion, θ (σσσ (t)) > θn+1 − η 2 (32) for all t ≥ T . Pick such T . Also, pick T large enough that (22) holds for any t > T and for any s ∈ [0,2T ]. By the assumption, there is t > T such that θ (www(t)) > θn. Pick such t. Then from (22), (32), and the definition of ε, we have θ (www(t + s)) > θn+1 − η for all s ∈ [T,2T ]. Applying the same argument again, we obtain θ (www(t + s)) > θn+1 − η for all s ≥ T , which implies that liminft→∞ θ (www(t)) ≥ θn+1 − η. Since η can be arbitrarily small, we obtain the result. Now we will show that θ (σt) converges almost surely. Suppose not, so that we have liminft→∞ θ (σt) < limsupt→∞ θ (σt) with positive probability. Then there is a path h such that the property stated in Theorem 3 is satisfied and such that liminft→∞ θ (σt) < limsupt→∞ θ (σt). Pick such h. Let (θn,θn+1) be an interval such that the intersection of the interval and [liminft→∞ θ (σt), limsupt→∞ θ (σt)] is non-empty. Assume for now that this interval satisfies property (i) stated 56 in lemma 3. By the definition of h, θ (www(t)) must exceed θn infinitely often, so Lemma 5 implies liminft→∞ θ (www(t)) ≥ θn+1. But this is a contradiction, because it implies that the intersection of (θn,θn+1) and [liminft→∞ θ (σt),limsupt→∞ θ (σt)] is empty. Likewise, if the interval (θn,θn+1) satisfies property (ii) in Lemma 3, there is a contradic- tion. Hence we must have liminft→∞ θ (σt) = limsupt→∞ θ (σt) almost surely. Also, Lemma 5 implies that for each interval (θn,θn+1) which satisfies property (i) in Lemma 3, we have limt→∞ θ (σt) ∈ (θn,θn+1) with zero probability. Obviously the same is true for each interval (θn,θn+1) which satisfies property (ii). Hence limt→∞ θ (σt)∈ Θ∗∗ almost surely. So for the case in which the boundary points {0,1} are equilibrium models, we have limt→∞ θ (σt) ∈ Θ∗. If θ = 0 is not an equilibrium model, then as in Lemma 3, we can show that θ (δx) > θ for any model θ ∈ [θ0,θ1) and for any x ∈ F(δθ ). Then as in Lemma 5, we can show that if a sample path h satisfies the property stated in Theorem 3 and θ (www(t)) ∈ [θ0,θ1) infinitely often, then liminft→∞ θ (www(t)) ≥ θ1. This immediately implies that σt converges to θ0 = 0 with zero probability. Similarly, if θ = 1 is not an equilibrium model, then σt converges to this model with zero probability. Hence the result follows. A.12 Proof of Proposition 7 It is obvious that (c) implies (b). So in this proof, we will show that (a) implies (c), and (b) implies (a). A.12.1 Step 1: (a) implies (c) Pick an attracting model θ∗, and let A = {σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ∗)θ (σ ) = θ∗}. This set is non-empty, because F is upper hemi-continuous in σ and θ (σ ) is continuous. We will show that this set A is robustly attracting. The following notation is useful. Let X1 be the set of all mixed strategies σ such that θ (σ ) < θ∗. From Proposition 5, this set is convex. Similarly, the set (cid:52)X \ X1 is convex. So there is a hyperplane H1 which separates these two sets; i.e., there is a vector λ1 ∈ RX and k1 such that λ1 · σ < k1 for all σ such that θ (σ ) < θ∗, and λ1 · σ ≥ k1 for all σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗. Similarly, letting X2 be the set of all σ such that θ (σ ) > θ∗, there is a hyperplane H2 which separates X2 and (cid:52)X \ X2, i.e., there is a vector λ2 ∈ RX and k2 such that λ2 · σ < k2 for all σ such that θ (σ ) > θ∗, and λ2 · σ ≥ k2 for all σ such that θ (σ ) ≤ θ∗. (These hyperplanes H1 and H2 may or may not coincide.) Let X ∗ be the set of all σ such that 57 θ (σ ) = θ∗. We first consider the special case in which F(δθ∗) = X, i.e., the agent is indifferent over all actions in the model θ∗. In this case, A = X ∗, i.e., the set A is the set of all mixed actions σ with θ (σ ) = θ∗. Later on, we will explain how to extend the proof technique to the case with F(δθ∗) ⊂ X. Case 1: F(δθ∗) = X. Pick ε > 0 as in the definition of attracting models. Then let Xε be the set of all σ such that θ (σ )− θ∗ < ε. We show that this set Xε is (a subset of) the basin of attraction. That is, given any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Xε, any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion will enter a neighborhood of the set A = X ∗ in finite time and stay there forever. σσσ (0). We first show that this So pick any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Xε and any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ solution σσσ never leaves the set Xε. Lemma 6. σσσ (t) ∈ Xε for all t, that is, σσσ (t)− θ∗ < ε for all t. Proof. Suppose that θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗) for some t. Then we have σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ (σσσ (t))). By the definition of ε, we must have θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗; then from Propo- sition 5, at the next instant t + η, we have θ (σσσ (t + η)) ≥ θ (σσσ (t)), i.e., θ (σσσ (t)) is weakly increasing in t if σσσ (t) ∈ [θ∗ − ε,θ∗). Similarly, if θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε), then θ (σσσ (t)) is weakly decreasing in t. This implies the result we want. Next, we show that A is attracting. It suffices to prove the following lemma: σσσ (0), we have d(σσσ (t), X ∗) < ε for all t > T . Lemma 7. For any ε > 0, there is T > 0 such that for any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Xε and any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ Proof. Suppose that θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗) for some t. Then as shown in the proof of the previous lemma, we have σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗. This in turn implies that λ1 · σσσ (t) = λ1 · (σ − σσσ (t)) ≥ k1 − λ1 · σσσ (t) > 0. Here the weak inequality follows from θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗, and the strict inequality follows from θ (σ ) < θ∗. Note that k1−λ1·σσσ (t) measures the current distance from σσσ (t) to the hyperplane H1, and λ1· σσσ (t) measures how much σσσ (t) gets closer to the hyperplane H1 at the next instant, So the equation above implies that σσσ (t) gets closer to H1 as time goes, and the speed of convergence is bounded away from zero until σσσ (t) enters a neighborhood of H1. 58 Similarly, if θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε) for some t, then σσσ (t) gets closer to the hyperplane H2 as time goes, and the speed of convergence is bounded away from zero until σσσ (t) enters a neighborhood of H2. This implies the result we want, because the set A = X ∗ is the space sandwiched by H1 and H2 (formally, A = (cid:52)X \ (X1)∪ X2)). As a last step, we show that the set A is robustly attracting: Lemma 8. The set A is robustly attracting. Proof. Let H(cid:48)1 be the set of all σ with θ (σ ) = θ∗ − ε 2, and H(cid:48)2 be the set of all σ with θ (σ ) = θ∗ + ε 2. Take a small ε∗ > 0 such that θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗)for all σ with d(σ ,H(cid:48)1) < ε∗, and such that θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε)for all σ with d(σ ,H(cid:48)2) < ε∗. Note that such ε∗ exists because H(cid:48)1, H(cid:48)2, X ∗, {σθ (σ ) = θ∗ − ε}, and {σθ (σ ) = θ∗ + ε} are all compact and disjoint. Consider any solution to the ε∗-perturbed differential inclusion, and suppose that σσσ (t) ∈ H(cid:48)1 for some t, i.e., suppose that θ (σσσ (t)) = θ∗ − ε 2. Then by the definition of ε∗, σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t) for some σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗, which implies that θ (σσσ (t)) moves up at the next instant. Likewise, if θ (σσσ (t)) = θ∗ + ε 2 for some t, then θ (σσσ (t)) moves down at the next instant. Accordingly, if the initial value is in the set {σθ∗ − ε 2}, any solution to the ε∗-perturbed differential inclusion cannot leave this set. This implies the result. 2 ≤ θ (σ ) ≤ ε Case 2: F(δθ∗) ⊂ X. Pick small ε > 0 as stated in the the definition of attracting models. Without loss of generality, we assume that F(δ θ ) ⊆ F(δθ∗) for all θ such that θ − θ∗ < ε. (Take ε small, if necessary.) Let Xε be as in the previous case. We show that this set Xε is (a subset of) the basin of attraction. That is, given any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Xε, any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) to the differential inclusion will enter a neighborhood of the set A in finite time and stay there forever. Note that now the set A is a strict subset of X ∗. Pick any initial value σσσ (0) ∈ Xε and any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0). Then Lemma 6 still holds, that is, σσσ (t) never leaves the set Xε. Also Lemma 7 still holds, that is, σσσ (t) moves toward to the set X ∗ as time goes. Also, by the definition of ε, we have F((cid:52)Θ(σ )) ⊆ F(δθ∗) for any σ ∈ Xε. This implies that at every time t, we have σσσ (t)[x] = −σσσ (t)[x] for each x /∈ F(δθ∗). This implies that σσσ (t) assigns probability zero on any action x /∈ F(δθ∗) in the limit as t → ∞, and in particular, for any ε > 0, there is T such that σσσ (t)[x] = −σσσ (t)[x] for all x /∈ F(δθ∗) and t > T . This and Lemma 7 imply that the set A is an attractor. 59 Also, we can show that the set A is robustly attracting; the proof is very similar to that of Lemma 8, and hence omitted. A.12.2 Step 2: (b) implies (a) Pick an arbitrary θ∗, and let A = {σ ∈ (cid:52)F(δθ∗)θ (σ ) = θ∗}. Suppose that A is an attractor. We will show that the model θ∗ is attracting. Let UA be the basin of the set A, and let σσσ (0) be such that θ (σσσ (0)) < θ∗. Then we have the following lemma: Lemma 9. For any θ ∈ (θ (σσσ (0)),θ∗) and for any σ ∈ F(δθ ), we have θ (σ ) > θ. Proof. Suppose not, so that there is θ ∈ (θ (σσσ (0),θ∗) and σ ∈ F(δθ ) such that θ (σ ) ≤ θ. Consider a solution to the differential inclusion σσσ ∈ S∞ σσσ (0) such that for any time t such that θ (σσσ (t)) = θ, we have σσσ (t) = σ − σσσ (t). Then σσσ (t) ≤ θ for all t; by the definition of σ, θ (σσσ (t)) must go down whenever it hits θ (σσσ (t)) = θ. This contradicts with the fact that σσσ (0) is in the basin of attraction. Since F(δθ ) is upper hemi-continuous in θ, there is ε > 0 such that F(δθ ) = F(δ θ ) for all θ , θ ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗). Then the lemma above implies that for any θ ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗) and for any σ ∈ F(δθ ), we have θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗. Similarly, we can show that there is ε > 0 such that for any θ ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε) and for any σ ∈ F(δθ ), we have θ (σ ) ≤ θ∗. Hence θ∗ is attracting. A.13 Proof of Proposition 8 Only if: Suppose that a model θ∗ ∈ (0,1) is repelling. Then upper hemi-continuity of F implies that there are pure actions x and x such that θ (δx) < θ∗ < θ (δ x) and and x, x ∈ F(δθ∗). Then from Proposition 5, there is a mixture σ∗ of these actions x and x such that θ (σ∗) = θ∗. Obviously this σ∗ is a mixed equilibrium with θ (σ∗) = θ∗. So it suffices to show that all mixed equilibria with θ (σ∗) = θ∗ are repelling. Choose ε > 0 as stated in the definition of repelling models. Then as in the proof of Proposition 7 there is a hyperplane which separates mixed actions σ with θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗ +ε from others. That is, there is λ1 ∈ RX and k1 ∈ R such that λ1·σ ≥ k1 if and only if θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗ +ε. Likewise, there is λ2 and k2 such that λ2 · σ ≥ k2 if and only if θ (σ ) ≤ θ∗ − ε. 60 Let U be the set of all σ such that θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗ − ε 2 ,θ∗ + ε 2 ). Also, choose T sufficiently large so that for all σ with θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε (k1 − λ1 · σ )T > k1 − λ1 · σ 2 ) and for all σ with θ ( σ ) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε (k2 − λ2 · σ )T > k2 − λ2 · σ 2 ), and that (33) (34) for all σ with θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗ − ε We will show that these U and T satisfy the property stated in the definition of repelling equilibria. This completes the proof, because any mixed equilibrium σ∗ with θ (σ∗) = θ∗ is in the interior of U . 2 ,θ∗) and for all σ with θ ( σ ) ∈ (θ∗ − ε 2 ,θ∗). The following result is useful: Claim 9. For any initial point σ ∈ U with θ (σ ) (cid:54)= θ∗ and for any solution σσσ ∈ S∞ differential inclusion, there is t < T such that σσσ (t) /∈ U . Proof. First, consider the case in which θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε Suppose that θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε σ − σσσ (t) for some σ such that θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗ + ε. Hence 2 ). Pick an arbitrary path σσσ ∈ S∞ σ . 2 ) in some period t. Then since θ∗ is repelling, σσσ (t) = σ to the λ1 · σσσ (t) = λ1 · (σ − σσσ (t)) ≥ k1 − λ1 · σσσ (t) > 0 where the weak inequality follows from θ (σ ) ≥ θ∗ +ε, and the strict inequality follows from θ (σσσ (t)) < θ∗ + ε 2 ) in the current period t. Hence there is t < T such that λ1·θ (σσσ (t)) ≥ θ∗ + ε 2, implying σσσ (t) /∈ U . A similar argument applies to the case in which θ (σ ) ∈ (θ∗ − ε 2 ,θ∗). 2. This implies that λ1 · σσσ (t) increases whenever θ (σσσ (t)) ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε Now we will show that U and T satisfy the property stated in the definition of repelling equilibria. Pick an arbitrary σ ∈ U . There are two cases to be considered. Case 1: θ (σ ) (cid:54)= θ∗. Pick any action x. For β close to one, a perturbed mixture βσ + (1− β )δx is still in the set U , and θ (βσ + (1− β )δx) (cid:54)= θ∗. Hence from the claim above, starting from this perturbed mixture βσ + (1− β )δx, any solution to the differential inclusion must leave the set U within time T . So this σ satisfies the property stated in the definition of repelling equilibria. Case 2: θ (σ ) = θ∗. Pick an arbitrary pure action x ∈ F(δθ∗). Since θ∗ is repelling, θ (δx) (cid:54)= θ∗. So from Proposition 5(iii), for any β sufficiently close to one, θ (βσ + (1 − 61 2 ,θ∗)∪ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε β )δx) ∈ (θ∗− ε 2 ). Hence, from the above claim, starting from this perturbed mixture βσ + (1−β )δx, any solution to the differential inclusion must leave the set U within time T . So this σ satisfies the property stated in the definition of repelling equilibria. If: Let θ∗ ∈ (0,1) be such that θ (δx) (cid:54)= θ∗ for each pure action x ∈ F(δθ∗), there is at least one mixed equilibrium σ∗ with θ (σ∗) = θ∗, and all such mixed equilibria are repelling. We will show that the model θ∗ is repelling. Pick an arbitrary repelling equilibrium σ∗ with θ (σ∗) = θ∗, and let T and U be as in the definition of repelling equilibria. Then each point σ ∈ U satisfies property (i) or (ii) in the definition of repelling equilibria. In particular, σ = σ∗ satisfies property (ii), i.e., starting from a perturbed action frequency βσ∗ + (1− β )δx, any solution to the differential inclusion must leave the neighborhood U of σ∗ within time T . This is so because σ∗ is an equilibrium and never satisfies property (i). As the following lemma shows, this property implies that θ∗ is indeed repelling. Lemma 10. θ∗ is repelling. Proof. We prove by contradiction, so suppose that θ∗ is not repelling. Then from the upper hemi-continuity of F, there is ε > 0 and a pure action x ∈ F(δθ∗) such that (a) θ (δx) > θ∗ and x ∈ F(δθ ) for all θ ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗), or (b) θ (δx) < θ∗ and x ∈ F(δθ ) for all θ ∈ (θ∗,θ∗ + ε). Pick such ε and x. In what follows, we focus on the case in which this action x satisfies property (a). (The proof for the other case is symmetric, and hence omitted.) Since σ∗ is a mixed equilibrium with θ (σ∗) = θ∗ and since there is no pure action x with θ (δx) = θ∗, there must be two actions x and x such that x, x ∈ F(δθ∗) and θ (δx) < θ∗ < θ (δ x). Pick such x and x. Pick β ∈ (0,1) close to one so that θ (βσ∗ + (1− β )δx) ∈ (θ∗ − ε,θ∗). Then consider the following path σσσ which starts from βσ∗ + (1− β )δx: if θ (σσσ (t)) < θ∗ if θ (σσσ (t)) = θ∗ . (cid:40) δx∗ − σσσ (t) σ∗ − σσσ (t) σσσ (t) = In words, on this path, the share of x∗ increases until θ (σσσ (t)) hits θ∗, and after that σσσ (t) moves toward the equilibrium σ∗. Clearly this path solves the differential inclusion with the initial value βσ∗ + (1−β )δx, and in particular, if β is sufficiently close to one, this path never leaves the neighborhood U of σ∗. This implies that σ = σ∗ does not satisfy property (ii) in the definition of repelling equilibria, which is a contradiction. 62 A.14 Proof of Proposition 9 We say a correspondence B : [0,1] → R has the staircase property if there exists a K < ∞, 0 = i=0 such that Ai ⊆ R closed, bounded and convex such a0 < a1 < ... < aK = 1 in [0,1] and (Ai)K that for each i ∈ {0, ...,K}, (i) B(ai) = Ai and for each θ ∈ (ai,ai+1), B(θ ) = ¯xi ≡ max{x: x ∈ Ai}, (ii) ¯xi = xi+1 ≡ min{x: x ∈ Ai+1}. Claim 10. The correspondence θ (cid:55)→ B(θ ) ≡ θ (∆F(δθ )) has the staircase property. Proof. We first show that if the mapping θ (cid:55)→ G(θ ) ≡ F(δθ ) is uhc and satisfies maxF(δθ ) ≤ minF(δθ(cid:48)) for all θ(cid:48) > θ, then it follows that there exists a K < ∞, 0 = a0 < a1 < ... < aK = 1 in [0,1] and (Ai)K i=0 such that Ai ⊆ X finite such that for each i ∈ {0, ...,K}, (i) G(ai) = Ai and for each θ ∈ (ai,ai+1), G(θ ) = ¯xi ≡ max{x: x ∈ Ai}, (ii) ¯xi = xi+1 ≡ min{x: x ∈ Ai+1}. Second, we will show that B has the staircase property with K, 0 = a0 < a1 < ... < aK = 1 in [0,1] and (Bi)K i=0 where Bi ≡ θ (∆Ai) = [θ (δxi),θ (δxi+1)]. For the first part note that if G is constant over a non-trivial interval, it must be single valued. If not, there exists a θ(cid:48) > θ such maxF(δθ ) > minF(δθ(cid:48)). Moreover by the order condition and the fact that X is finite, it follows that the set of points in [0,1] wherein G is multi-valued is finite, we denote it as 0 = a0 < a1 < ... < aK = 1. For each i ∈ {1, ..,K}, let Ai ≡ G(ai). As maxG(θ ) ≤ minG(θ ) for all θ(cid:48) > θ, it follows that for each θ ∈ (ai,ai+1), G(θ ) ≥ ¯xi ≡ max{x: x ∈ Ai} and ¯xi ≤ xi+1 ≡ min{x: x ∈ Ai+1}. By the fact that G is uhc and X is finite, it must hold that G(θ ) = ¯xi, otherwise there exists a sequence a sequence (θn,x)n converging to (ai,x) such that x = G(θn) but x > max{x: x ∈ G(ai)}. A similar argument shows that ¯xi = xi+1. We now show the correspondence θ (cid:55)→ B(θ ) ≡ θ (∆F(δθ )) has the staircase property. Take any i ∈ {0, ...,K}, for any b ∈ (ai,ai+1), B(b) = θi ≡ θ (δ ¯xi) and B(ai) = θ (∆F(δai)) = θ (∆Ai); this establishes condition (i) of the definition. We will show now that θ (∆Ai) = [θ (δxi),θ (δ ¯xi+1)] which will finish the proof. By finiteness of X, Ai = {x(1), ...,x(L)} such that x(1) < x(2) < ... < x(L) (where the indexes can depend on i), and as x (cid:55)→ θ (δx) is increasing, θ (δx(1)) < ... < θ (δx(L)). We first show that θ (∆Ai) ⊆ [θ (δxi),θ (δ ¯xi+1)]. For this, we first show that θ (δxi) = θ (δx(1)) = min{θ : θ ∈ θ (∆Ai)} . If L = 2, then ∆Ai = {σλ (x(1),x(2)) ≡ λ1δx(1) + λ2δx(2) : λ ∈ ∆1} We do this iteratively. (throughout, σλ (x(i), ..,x(m)) denotes a mixed action over actions x(i), ...,x(m) with weights 63 λ ). By Proposition 5, λ (cid:55)→ θ (σλ (x(1),x(2))) is non-decreasing, there θ (δx(1)) = min{θ : θ ∈ θ (∆Ai)} ≤ θ (δx(2)) = max{θ : θ ∈ θ (∆Ai)}. If L = 3, we want to show that θ (δx(1)) ≤ θ (σλ (x(1),x(2),x(3))) for any λ ∈ ∆2. If λ1 = 0, then it suffices to show that θ (δx(1)) ≤ θ (σλ (x(2),x(3))) for any λ ∈ ∆1. By our calculations for the case L = 2, it follows that θ (δx(2)) ≤ θ (σλ (x(2),x(3))) and since θ (δx(1)) ≤ θ (δx(2)) the desired result follows. If λ1 > 0, then σλ (x(1),x(2),x(3)) = λ1δx(1) +(1−λ1) = λ1δx(1) +(1−λ1)σλ(cid:48)(x(2),x(3)) (cid:18) λ2 δx(2) + λ3 1− λ1 δx(3) 1− λ1 (cid:19) for a λ(cid:48) that is a function of λ . So, by Proposition 5, it suffices to show that θ (δx(1)) ≤ θ (σλ (x(2),x(3))) for any λ ∈ ∆1, which we already showed. Iterating in this fashion the result can be showed for L ≥ 1. The proof that θ (δ ¯xi) = θ (δx(L)) = max{θ : θ ∈ θ (∆Ai)} is analogous and thus omitted. Finally, since ¯xi = xi+1, it follows that θ (δ ¯xi) = θ (δxi+1). Thus, we have shown that θ (∆Ai) ⊆ [θ (δxi),θ (δxi+1)] as desired. We now show that θ (∆Ai) ⊇ [θ (δxi),θ (δxi+1)]. Suppose not, that is, there exists a θ ∈ [θ (δxi),θ (δxi+1)]\θ (∆Ai). There exists a l ∈ {1, ...,L} such that θ (δx(l)) ≤ θ ≤ θ (δx(l+1)). By Lemma 1, λ (cid:55)→ θ (σλ (x(l),x(l +1)) is continuous. By Bolzano, there exists a λ∗ such that θ = θ (σλ∗(x(l),x(l +1)). But σλ∗(x(l),x(l +1)) ∈ ∆Ai and we thus arrived to a contradiction. Let Θ∗ be the set of equilibrium models. It is easy to check that Θ∗ coincides with the set of fixed points of B. Also, this set is nonempty: we can take a nondecreasing selection from the correspondence B and, by Tarski's fixed point theorem, it must have at least one fixed point; since it is a selection of B, then B must have at least one fixed point. Moreover, as B has the staircase property, the set of fixed points Θ∗ is finite and its elements can only be in the following form: 1. An end-point of a vertical segment of B. 2. An interior point of a vertical segment of B. 3. A point in the interior of a horizontal segment of B. 4. θ = 0 when there exists a a > 0 such that B(θ ) = 0 for all θ ∈ [0,a], or θ = 1 when By Proposition 6, (θ (σt))t converges almost surely to one element in Θ∗. We now show there exists a a > 0 such that B(θ ) = 1 for all θ ∈ [1− a,1]. that it has to converge to an element characterized by cases 3 or 4. 64 Case 1 is ruled out because at an end-point of a vertical segment θ(cid:48), F(δθ(cid:48)) contains more than one action, and so the corresponding pure action equilibrium is not strict, a situation that was ruled out by assumption. An equilibrium model characterized by case 2 is repelling by Definition 7. By Proposition 8, the mixed action associated to this equilibrium model is repelling. Thus, by Proposition 3, the action frequency converges to such equilibrium model with probability zero. Therefore, convergence occurs to an equilibrium model characterized in case 3 or 4. Equilibrium models characterized in cases 3 and 4 are attracting by Definition 2 and are supported by a pure action. To conclude, let θ∗ be the point to which the sequence (θ (σt))t converges to, and denote the associated pure strategy by x∗. The fact that θ (.) is increasing implies that (σt)t converges to x∗. Finally, we observe that using Theorem 1 it can be shown that (σt)t converging to x∗ implies that the beliefs (µt)t converges to δθ∗ where θ∗ = θ (δx∗). As F(δθ∗) is a pure action, upper hemi-continuity of F implies that (F(µt))t also converges to x∗. A.15 Proof of Proposition 10 ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ) ⊆ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) F0(µ): Let σ ∈ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ). Fix any x such that σ (x) > 0. Since σ ∈ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ), there exists µx ∈ ∆Θ(σ ) such that x ∈ Fβ (µx). It suffices to show that x ∈ F0(µx). Since x ∈ Fβ (µx), for any x(cid:48) ∈ X, (π(x,y) + βV (B(x,y, µx)) ¯Qµx(dy x) = ≥ ≥ (π(x,y) ¯Qµx(dy x) + βV (µx) (cid:0)π(x(cid:48),y) + βV (B(x(cid:48),y, µx))(cid:1) ¯Qµx(dy x(cid:48)) (π(x(cid:48),y) ¯Qµx(dy x(cid:48)) + βV (µx), where the first line follows from weak identification (which implies B(x,y, µx) = µx for all y in the support of ¯Qµx(· x)), the second line follows from x ∈ Fβ (µx), and the third line follows ´ from the convexity of the value function and the martingale property of Bayesian updating V (B(x(cid:48),y, µx)) ¯Qµx(dy x(cid:48))≥V ( B(x(cid:48),y, µx) ¯Qµx(dy (which imply, using Jensen's inequality, x(cid:48))) = V (µx)). Therefore, x is myopically the best action, i.e., x ∈ F0(µx). ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) F0(µ) =∪µ∈∆Θ(σ )∆F0(µ): The direction ⊇ holds trivially, so we only establish ⊆. Let σ ∈ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) F0(µ). Fix any x,x(cid:48) such that σ (x) > 0. Since σ ∈ ∆∪µ∈∆Θ(σ ) Fβ (µ), there exist µx, µx(cid:48) ∈ ∆Θ(σ ) such that x ∈ F0(µx) and x(cid:48) ∈ F0(µx(cid:48)). By weak identification and ´ 65 the fact that µx and µx(cid:48) both belong to ∆Θ(σ ), ¯Qµx(· x) = ¯Qµx(cid:48) of σ. Therefore, for any x(cid:48)(cid:48) ∈ X, (· x) for all x in the support π(x(cid:48),y) ¯Qµx(dyx(cid:48)) = π(x,y(cid:48)) ¯Qµx(dyx) ≥ π(x(cid:48)(cid:48),y) ¯Qµx(dyx(cid:48)(cid:48)), and so x(cid:48) ∈ F0(µx). Since x(cid:48) is an arbitrary element in the support of σ, we have shown that there is a common belief µx under which any action in the support of σ is optimal. 66
1905.13645	3	1905	2019-12-11T15:01:41	Resolving New Keynesian Anomalies with Wealth in the Utility Function	[ "econ.TH" ]	At the zero lower bound, the New Keynesian model predicts that output and inflation collapse to implausibly low levels, and that government spending and forward guidance have implausibly large effects. To resolve these anomalies, we introduce wealth into the utility function; the justification is that wealth is a marker of social status, and people value status. Since people partly save to accrue social status, the Euler equation is modified. As a result, when the marginal utility of wealth is sufficiently large, the dynamical system representing the zero-lower-bound equilibrium transforms from a saddle to a source---which resolves all the anomalies.	econ.TH	econ	Resolving New Keynesian Anomalies with Wealth in the Utility Function Pascal Michaillat, Emmanuel Saez December 2019 9 1 0 2 c e D 1 1 ] . H T n o c e [ 3 v 5 4 6 3 1 . 5 0 9 1 : v i X r a At the zero lower bound, the New Keynesian model predicts that output and in(cid:28)a- tion collapse to implausibly low levels, and that government spending and forward guidance have implausibly large effects. To resolve these anomalies, we introduce wealth into the utility function; the justi(cid:27)cation is that wealth is a marker of social status, and people value status. Since people partly save to accrue social status, the Euler equation is modi(cid:27)ed. As a result, when the marginal utility of wealth is suf(cid:27)- ciently large, the dynamical system representing the zero-lower-bound equilibrium transforms from a saddle to a source -- which resolves all the anomalies. Michaillat: Brown University. Saez: University of California -- Berkeley. We thank Sushant Acharya, Adrien Auclert, Gadi Barlevi, Marco Bassetto, Jess Benhabib, Florin Bilbiie, Jeffrey Campbell, Edouard Challe, Varanya Chaubey, John Cochrane, Behzad Diba, Gauti Eggertsson, Erik Eyster, Francois Gourio, Pete Klenow, Olivier Loisel, Neil Mehrotra, Emi Nakamura, Sam Schulhofer-Wohl, David Sraer, Jon Steinsson, Harald Uhlig, and Ivan Werning for helpful discussions and comments. This work was supported by the Institute for Advanced Study and the Berkeley Center for Equitable Growth. available at https://www.pascalmichaillat.org/11.html 1. Introduction A current issue in monetary economics is that the New Keynesian model makes several anomalous predictions when the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates (ZLB) is binding: implausibly large collapse of output and in(cid:28)ation (Eggertsson and Woodford 2004; Eggertsson 2011; Werning 2011); implausibly large effect of forward guidance (Del Negro, Giannoni, and Patterson 2015; Carlstrom, Fuerst, and Paustian 2015; Cochrane 2017); and implausibly large effect of government spending (Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Rebelo 2011; Woodford 2011; Cochrane 2017). Several papers have developed variants of the New Keynesian model that behave well at the ZLB (Gabaix 2016; Diba and Loisel 2019; Cochrane 2018; Bilbiie 2019; Acharya and Dogra 2019); but these variants are more complex than the standard model. In some cases the derivations are complicated by bounded rationality or heterogeneity. In other cases the dynamical system repre- senting the equilibrium -- normally composed of an Euler equation and a Phillips curve -- includes additional differential equations that describe bank-reserve dynamics, price-level dynamics, or the evolution of the wealth distribution. Moreover, a good chunk of the analysis is conducted by numerical simulations. Hence, it is sometimes dif(cid:27)cult to grasp the nature of the anomalies and their resolutions. It may therefore be valuable to strip the logic to the bone. We do so using a New Keynesian model in which relative wealth enters the utility function. The justi(cid:27)cation for the assumption is that relative wealth is a marker of social status, and people value high social status. We deviate from the standard model only minimally: the derivations are the same; the equilibrium is described by a dynamical system composed of an Euler equation and a Phillips curve; the only difference is an extra term in the Euler equation. We also veer away from numerical simulations and establish our results with phase diagrams describing the dynamics of output and in(cid:28)ation given by the Euler-Phillips system. The model's simplicity and the phase diagrams allow us to gain new insights into the anomalies and their resolutions.1 Using the phase diagrams, we begin by depicting the anomalies in the standard New Keynesian model. First, we (cid:27)nd that output and in(cid:28)ation collapse to unboundedly low levels when the ZLB episode is arbitrarily long-lasting. Second, we (cid:27)nd that there is a duration of forward guidance 1Our approach relates to the work of Michaillat and Saez (2014), Ono and Yamada (2018), and Michau (2018). By assuming wealth in the utility function, they obtain non-New-Keynesian models that behave well at the ZLB. But their results are not portable to the New Keynesian framework because they require strong forms of wage or price rigidity (exogenous wages, (cid:27)xed in(cid:28)ation, or downward nominal wage rigidity). Our approach also relates to the work of Fisher (2015) and Campbell et al. (2017), who build New Keynesian models with government bonds in the utility function. The bonds-in-the-utility assumption captures special features of government bonds relative to other assets, such as safety and liquidity (for example, Krishnamurthy and Vissing-Jorgensen 2012). While their assumption and ours are conceptually different, they affect equilibrium conditions in a similar way. These papers use their assumption to generate risk-premium shocks (Fisher) and to alleviate the forward-guidance puzzle (Campbell et al.). 1 above which any ZLB episode, irrespective of its duration, is transformed into a boom. Such boom is unbounded when the ZLB episode is arbitrarily long-lasting. Third, we (cid:27)nd that there is an amount of government spending at which the government-spending multiplier becomes in(cid:27)nite when the ZLB episode is arbitrarily long-lasting. Furthermore, when government spending exceeds this amount, an arbitrarily long ZLB episode prompts an unbounded boom. The phase diagrams also pinpoint the origin of the anomalies: they arise because the Euler- Phillips system is a saddle at the ZLB. In normal times, by contrast, the Euler-Phillips system is source, so there are no anomalies. In economic terms, the anomalies arise because household consumption (given by the Euler equation) responds too strongly to the real interest rate. Indeed, since the only motive for saving is future consumption, households are very forward-looking, and their response to interest rates is strong. Once wealth enters the utility function, however, the Euler equation is "discounted" -- in the sense of McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson (2017) -- which alters the properties of the Euler-Phillips system. People now save partly because they enjoy holding wealth; this is a present consideration, which does not require them to look into the future. As people are less forward-looking, their consumption responds less to interest rates; this creates discounting. With enough marginal utility of wealth, the discounting is strong enough to transform the Euler-Phillips system from a saddle to a source at the ZLB and thus eliminate all the anomalies. First, output and in(cid:28)ation never collapse at the ZLB: they are bounded below by the ZLB steady state. Second, when the ZLB episode is long enough, the economy necessarily experiences a slump, irrespective of the duration of forward guidance. Third, government-spending multipliers are always (cid:27)nite, irrespective of the duration of the ZLB episode. Apart from its anomalies, the standard New Keynesian model has several other intriguing properties at the ZLB -- some labeled "paradoxes" because they defy usual economic logic (Eg- gertsson 2010; Werning 2011; Eggertsson and Krugman 2012). Our model shares these properties. First, the paradox of thri(cid:29) holds: when households desire to save more than their neighbors, the economy contracts and they end up saving the same amount as the neighbors. The paradox of toil also holds: when households desire to work more, the economy contracts and they end up working less. The paradox of (cid:28)exibility is present too: the economy contracts when prices become more (cid:28)exible. Last, the government-spending multiplier is above one, so government spending stimulates private consumption. 2. Justi(cid:27)cation for Wealth in the Utility Function Before delving into the model, we justify our assumption of wealth in the utility function. 2 The standard model assumes that people save to smooth consumption over time, but it has long been recognized that people seem to enjoy accumulating wealth irrespective of future consumption. Describing the European upper class of the early 20th century, Keynes (1919, chap. 2) noted that "The duty of saving became nine-tenths of virtue and the growth of the cake the object of true religion.... Saving was for old age or for your children; but this was only in theory -- the virtue of the cake was that it was never to be consumed, neither by you nor by your children a(cid:29)er you." Irving Fisher added that "A man may include in the bene(cid:27)ts of his wealth ...the social standing he thinks it gives him, or political power and in(cid:28)uence, or the mere miserly sense of possession, or the satisfaction in the mere process of further accumulation" (Fisher 1930, p. 17). Fisher's perspective is interesting since he developed the theory of saving based on consumption smoothing. Neuroscienti(cid:27)c evidence con(cid:27)rms that wealth itself provides utility, independently of the consumption it can buy. Camerer, Loewenstein, and Prelec (2005, p. 32) note that "brain-scans conducted while people win or lose money suggest that money activates similar reward areas as do other 'primary reinforcers' like food and drugs, which implies that money confers direct utility, rather than simply being valued only for what it can buy." Among all the reasons why people may value wealth, we focus on social status: we postu- late that people enjoy wealth because it provides social status. We therefore introduce relative (not absolute) wealth into the utility function.2 The assumption is convenient: in equilibrium everybody is the same, so relative wealth is zero. And the assumption seems plausible. Adam Smith, Ricardo, John Rae, J.S. Mill, Marshall, Veblen, and Frank Knight all believed that people accumulate wealth to attain high social status (Steedman 1981). More recently, a broad literature has documented that people seek to achieve high social status, and that accumulating wealth is a prevalent pathway to do so (Weiss and Fershtman 1998; Heffetz and Frank 2011; Fiske 2010; Anderson, Hildreth, and Howland 2015; Cheng and Tracy 2013; Ridgeway 2014; Mattan, Kubota, and Cloutier 2017).3 2Cole, Mailath, and Postlewaite (1992, 1995) develop models in which relative wealth does not directly confer utility but has other attributes such that people behave as if wealth entered their utility function. In one such model, wealthier individuals have higher social rankings, which allows them to marry wealthier partners and enjoy higher utility. 3The wealth-in-the-utility assumption has been found useful in models of long-run growth (Kurz 1968; Konrad 1992; Zou 1994; Corneo and Jeanne 1997; Futagami and Shibata 1998), risk attitudes (Robson 1992; Clemens 2004), asset pricing (Bakshi and Chen 1996; Gong and Zou 2002; Kamihigashi 2008; Michau, Ono, and Schlegl 2018), life-cycle consumption (Zou 1995; Carroll 2000; Francis 2009; Straub 2019), social strati(cid:27)cation (Long and Shimomura 2004), international macroeconomics (Fisher 2005; Fisher and Hof 2005), (cid:27)nancial crises (Kumhof, Ranciere, and Winant 2015), and optimal taxation (Saez and Stantcheva 2018). Such usefulness lends further support to the assumption. 3 3. New Keynesian Model with Wealth in the Utility Function We extend the New Keynesian model by assuming that households derive utility not only from consumption and leisure but also from relative wealth. To simplify derivations and be able to represent the equilibrium with phase diagrams, we use an alternative formulation of the New Keynesian model, inspired by Benhabib, Schmitt-Grohe, and Uribe (2001) and Werning (2011). Our formulation features continuous time instead of discrete time; self-employed households instead of (cid:27)rms and households; and Rotemberg (1982) pricing instead of Calvo (1983) pricing. 3.1. Assumptions The economy is composed of a measure 1 of self-employed households. Each household j ∈ [0, 1] produces yj(t) units of a good j at time t, sold to other households at a price pj(t). The household's production function is yj(t) = ahj(t), where a > 0 represents the level of technology, and hj(t) is hours of work. Working causes a disutility κhj(t), where κ > 0 is the marginal disutility of labor. The goods produced by households are imperfect substitutes for one another, so each house- hold exercises some monopoly power. Moreover, households face a quadratic cost when they change their price: changing a price at a rate πj(t) = (cid:219)pj(t)/pj(t) causes a disutility γ πj(t)2/2. The parameter γ > 0 governs the cost to change prices and thus price rigidity. Each household consumes goods produced by other households. Household j buys quantities cjk(t) of the goods k ∈ [0, 1]. These quantities are aggregated into a consumption index (cid:20)Þ 1 0 (cid:20)Þ 1 0 (cid:21)/(−1) , (cid:21) 1/(1−) . where > 1 is the elasticity of substitution between goods. The consumption index yields utility ln(cj(t)). Given the consumption index, the relevant price index is cj(t) = cjk(t)(−1)/ dk p(t) = pj(t)1− di When households optimally allocate their consumption expenditure across goods, p(t) is the price of one unit of consumption index. The in(cid:28)ation rate is de(cid:27)ned as π(t) = (cid:219)p(t)/p(t). Households save using government bonds. Since we postulate that people derive utility from their relative real wealth, and since bonds are the only store of wealth, holding bonds directly 4 provides utility. Formally, holding a nominal quantity of bonds bj(t) yields utility (cid:19) The function u : (cid:82) → (cid:82) is increasing and concave, b(t) =Þ 1 (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) p(t) u . and [bj(t) − b(t)]/p(t) is household j's relative real wealth. 0 bk(t) dk is average nominal wealth, Bonds earn a nominal interest rate ih(t) = i(t) + σ , where i(t) ≥ 0 is the nominal interest rate set by the central bank, and σ ≥ 0 is a spread between the monetary-policy rate (i(t)) and the rate used by households for savings decisions (ih(t)). The spread σ captures the ef(cid:27)ciency of (cid:27)nancial intermediation (Woodford 2011); the spread is large when (cid:27)nancial intermediation is severely disrupted, as during the Great Depression and Great Recession. The law of motion of household j bond holdings is pk(t)cjk(t) dk − τ(t). (cid:219)bj(t) = ih(t)bj(t) + pj(t)yj(t) − The term ih(t)bj(t) is interest income; pj(t)yj(t) is labor income;Þ 1 0 pk(t)cjk(t) dk is consumption expenditure; and τ(t) is a lump-sum tax (used among other things to service government debt). Lastly, the problem of household j is to choose time paths for yj(t), pj(t), hj(t), πj(t), cjk(t) for all k ∈ [0, 1], and bj(t) to maximize the discounted sum of instantaneous utilities 0 Þ 1 (cid:20) Þ ∞ 0 (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) (cid:19) p(t) 2 πj(t)2(cid:21) dt, −δt e ln(cj(t)) + u − κhj(t) − γ where δ > 0 is the time discount rate. The household faces four constraints: production function; law of motion of good j's price, (cid:219)pj(t) = πj(t)pj(t); law of motion of bond holdings; and demand for good j coming from other households' maximization, (cid:21)− (cid:20)pj(t) p(t) yj(t) = c(t), where c(t) =Þ 1 0 ck(t) dk is aggregate consumption. The household also faces a borrowing con- straint preventing Ponzi schemes. The household takes as given aggregate variables, initial wealth bj(0), and initial price pj(0). All households face the same initial conditions, so they will behave the same. 5 3.2. Euler Equation and Phillips Curve The equilibrium is described by a system of two differential equations: an Euler equation and a Phillips curve. The Euler-Phillips system governs the dynamics of output y(t) and in(cid:28)ation π(t). Here we present the system; formal and heuristic derivations are in appendices A and B; a discrete-time version is in appendix C. The Phillips curve arises from households' optimal pricing decisions: where (cid:219)π(t) = δπ(t) − κ γ a [y(t) − yn] , yn = − 1 · a κ . (1) (2) The Phillips curve is not modi(cid:27)ed by wealth in the utility function. The steady-state Phillips curve, obtained by setting (cid:219)π = 0 in (1), describes in(cid:28)ation as a linearly increasing function of output: π = κ δγ a (y − yn) . (3) We see that yn is the natural level of output: the level at which producers keep their prices constant. The Euler equation arises from households' optimal consumption-savings decisions: (cid:219)y(t) y(t) = r(t) − r n + u (cid:48)(0)[y(t) − yn] , where r(t) = i(t) − π(t) is the real monetary-policy rate and (cid:48)(0)yn. r n = δ − σ − u (4) (5) The marginal utility of wealth, u(cid:48)(0), enters the Euler equation, so unlike the Phillips curve, the Euler equation is modi(cid:27)ed by the wealth-in-the-utility assumption. To understand why consumption-savings choices are affected by the assumption, we rewrite the Euler equation as (cid:219)y(t) y(t) = r h(t) − δ + u (cid:48)(0)y(t), (6) where r h(t) = r(t) + σ is the real interest rate on bonds. In the standard equation, consumption- savings choices are governed by the (cid:27)nancial returns on wealth, given by r h(t), and the cost 6 of delaying consumption, given by δ. Here, people also enjoy holding wealth, so a new term appears to capture the hedonic returns on wealth: the marginal rate of substitution between wealth and consumption, u(cid:48)(0)y(t). In the marginal rate of substitution, the marginal utility of wealth is u(cid:48)(0) because in equilibrium all households hold the same wealth so relative wealth is zero; the marginal utility of consumption is 1/y(t) because consumption utility is log. Thus the wealth-in-the-utility assumption operates by transforming the rate of return on wealth from r h(t) to r h(t) + u(cid:48)(0)y(t). Because consumption-savings choices depend not only on interest rates but also on the marginal rate of substitution between wealth and consumption, future interest rates have less impact on today's consumption than in the standard model: the Euler equation is discounted. In fact, the discrete-time version of Euler equation (4) features discounting exactly as in McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson (2017) (see appendix C). The steady-state Euler equation is obtained by setting (cid:219)y = 0 in (4): (cid:48)(0)(y − yn) = r n − r . u (7) The equation describes output as a linearly decreasing function of the real monetary-policy rate -- as in the old-fashioned, Keynesian IS curve. We see that r n is the natural rate of interest: the real monetary-policy rate at which households consume a quantity yn. The steady-state Euler equation is deeply affected by the wealth-in-the-utility assumption. To understand why, we rewrite (7) as r h + u (cid:48)(0)y = δ . (8) The standard steady-state Euler equation boils down to r h = δ. It imposes that the (cid:27)nancial rate of return on wealth equals the time discount rate -- otherwise households would not keep their consumption constant. With wealth in the utility function, the returns on wealth are not only (cid:27)nancial but also hedonic. The total rate of return becomes r h +u(cid:48)(0)y, where the hedonic returns are measured by u(cid:48)(0)y. The steady-state Euler equation imposes that the total rate of return on wealth equals the time discount rate, so it now involves output y. When the real interest rate r h is higher, people have a (cid:27)nancial incentive to save more and postpone consumption. They keep consumption constant only if the hedonic returns on wealth fall enough to offset the increase in (cid:27)nancial returns: this requires output to decline. As a result, with wealth in the utility function, the steady-state Euler equation describes output as a decreasing function of the real interest rate -- as in the traditional IS curve, but through a different mechanism. The wealth-in-the-utility assumption adds one parameter to the equilibrium conditions: u(cid:48)(0). Accordingly, we compare two submodels: 7 Definition 1. The New Keynesian (NK) model has zero marginal utility of wealth: u(cid:48)(0) = 0. The wealth-in-the-utility New Keynesian (WUNK) model has su(cid:28)cient marginal utility of wealth: (cid:48)(0) > u κ δγ a . (9) The NK model is the standard model; the WUNK model is the extension proposed in this paper. When prices are (cid:27)xed (γ → ∞), condition (9) becomes u(cid:48)(0) > 0; when prices are perfectly (cid:28)exible (γ = 0), condition (9) becomes u(cid:48)(0) > ∞. Hence, at the (cid:27)xed-price limit, the WUNK model only requires an in(cid:27)nitesimal marginal utility of wealth; at the (cid:28)exible-price limit, the WUNK model is not well-de(cid:27)ned. In the WUNK model we also impose δ >(cid:112)( − 1)/γ in order to accommodate positive natural rates of interest.4 3.3. Natural Rate of Interest and Monetary Policy The central bank aims to maintain the economy at the natural steady state, where in(cid:28)ation is at zero and output at its natural level. In normal times, the natural rate of interest is positive, and the central bank is able to maintain the economy at the natural steady state using the simple policy rule i(π(t)) = r n + ϕπ(t). The corresponding real policy rate is r(π(t)) = r n + (ϕ − 1) π(t). The parameter ϕ ≥ 0 governs the response of interest rates to in(cid:28)ation: monetary policy is active when ϕ > 1 and passive when ϕ < 1. When the natural rate of interest is negative, however, the natural steady state cannot be achieved -- because this would require the central bank to set a negative nominal policy rate, which would violate the ZLB. In that case, the central bank moves to the ZLB: i(t) = 0, so r(t) = −π(t). What could cause the natural rate of interest to be negative? A (cid:27)rst possibility is a banking crisis, which disrupts (cid:27)nancial intermediation and raises the interest-rate spread (Woodford 2011; Eggertsson 2011). The natural rate of interest turns negative when the spread is large enough: σ > δ − u(cid:48)(0)yn. Another possibility in the WUNK model is drop in consumer sentiment, which 4Indeed, using (2) and (9), we see that in the WUNK model This implies that the natural rate of interest, r n = δ [1 − u(cid:48)(0)yn/δ], is bounded above: be positive, which requires δ >(cid:112)( − 1)/γ . For the WUNK model to accommodate positive natural rates of interest, the upper bound on the natural rate must u(cid:48)(0)yn δ r n < δ δ 2 · − 1 1 − 1 γ . 1 > . γ δ 2 · − 1 (cid:21) (cid:20) 8 leads households to favor saving over consumption, and can be parameterized by an increase in the marginal utility of wealth. The natural rate of interest turns negative when the marginal utility is large enough: u(cid:48)(0) > (δ − σ)/yn. 3.4. Properties of the Euler-Phillips System We now establish the properties of the Euler-Phillips systems in the NK and WUNK models by constructing their phase diagrams.5 The diagrams are displayed in (cid:27)gure 1. We begin with the Phillips curve, which gives (cid:219)π . First, we plot the locus (cid:219)π = 0, which we label "Phillips." The locus is given by the steady-state Phillips curve (3): it is linear, upward sloping, and goes through the point [y = yn, π = 0]. Second, we plot the arrows giving the directions of the trajectories solving the Euler-Phillips system. The sign of (cid:219)π is given by the Phillips curve (1): any point above the Phillips line (where (cid:219)π = 0) has (cid:219)π > 0, and any point below the line has (cid:219)π < 0. So in(cid:28)ation is rising above the Phillips line and falling below it. We next turn to the Euler equation, which gives (cid:219)y. Whereas the Phillips curve is the same in the NK and WUNK models, and in normal times and at the ZLB, the Euler equation is different in each case. We therefore proceed case by case. We start with the NK model in normal times and with active monetary policy (panel A). The Euler equation (4) becomes (cid:219)y y = (ϕ − 1)π , with ϕ > 1. The locus (cid:219)y = 0, labeled "Euler," is simply the horizontal line π = 0. Since the Phillips and Euler lines only intersect at the point [y = yn, π = 0], we conclude that the Euler-Phillips system admits a unique steady state with zero in(cid:28)ation and natural output. Next we examine the sign of (cid:219)y. As ϕ > 1, any point above the Euler line has (cid:219)y > 0, and any point below the line has (cid:219)y < 0. Since all the trajectories solving the Euler-Phillips system move away from the steady state in the four quadrants delimited by the Phillips and Euler lines, we conclude that the Euler-Phillips system is a source. We then consider the WUNK model in normal times with active monetary policy (panel B). The Euler equation (4) becomes (cid:219)y y = (ϕ − 1)π + u (cid:48)(0)(y − yn) , 5The properties are rederived using an algebraic approach in appendix D. 9 A. NK model: normal times, active monetary policy B. WUNK model: normal times, active monetary policy C. NK model: ZLB D. WUNK model: ZLB Figure 1. Phase Diagrams of the Euler-Phillips System in the NK and WUNK Models The (cid:27)gure displays phase diagrams for the dynamical system generated by the Euler equation (4) and Phillips curve (1): y is output; π is in(cid:28)ation; yn is the natural level of output; the Euler line is the locus (cid:219)y = 0; the Phillips line is the locus (cid:219)π = 0; the trajectories are solutions to the Euler-Phillips system linearized around its steady state, plotted for t going from −∞ to +∞. The four panels contrast various cases. The NK model is the standard New Keynesian model. The WUNK model is the same model, except that the marginal utility of wealth is not zero but is suf(cid:27)ciently large to satisfy (9). In normal times, the natural rate of interest r n is positive, and the monetary-policy rate is given by i = r n + ϕπ ; when monetary policy is active, ϕ > 1. At the ZLB, the natural rate of interest is negative, and the monetary-policy rate is zero. The (cid:27)gure shows that in the NK model, the Euler-Phillips system is a source in normal times with active monetary policy (panel A); but the system is a saddle at the ZLB (panel C). In the WUNK model, by contrast, the Euler-Phillips system is a source both in normal times and at the ZLB (panels B and D). (Panels A and B display a nodal source, but the system could also be a spiral source, depending on the value of ϕ; in panel D the system is always a nodal source.) 10 with ϕ > 1. We (cid:27)rst use the Euler equation to compute the Euler line (locus (cid:219)y = 0): π = − u(cid:48)(0) ϕ − 1(y − yn). The Euler line is linear, downward sloping (as ϕ > 1), and goes through the point [y = yn, π = 0]. Since the Phillips and Euler lines only intersect at the point [y = yn, π = 0], we conclude that the Euler-Phillips system admits a unique steady state, with zero in(cid:28)ation and output at its natural level. Next we use the Euler equation to determine the sign of (cid:219)y. As ϕ > 1, any point above the Euler line has (cid:219)y > 0, and any point below it has (cid:219)y < 0. Hence, the solution trajectories move away from the steady state in all four quadrants of the phase diagram; we conclude that the Euler-Phillips system is a source. In normal times with active monetary policy, the Euler-Phillips system therefore behaves similarly in the NK and WUNK models. We next turn to the NK model at the ZLB (panel C). The Euler equation (4) becomes (cid:219)y y = −π − r n. Thus the Euler line (locus (cid:219)y = 0) shi(cid:29)s up from π = 0 in normal times to π = −r n > 0 at the ZLB. We infer that the Euler-Phillips system admits a unique steady state, where in(cid:28)ation is positive and output is above its natural level. Furthermore, any point above the Euler line has (cid:219)y < 0, and any point below it has (cid:219)y > 0. As a result, the solution trajectories move toward the steady state in the southwest and northeast quadrants of the phase diagram, whereas they move away from it in the southeast and northwest quadrants. We infer that the Euler-Phillips system is a saddle. We (cid:27)nally move to the WUNK model at the ZLB (panel D). The Euler equation (4) becomes (cid:219)y y = −π − r n + u (cid:48)(0)(y − yn) . First, this differential equation implies that the Euler line (locus (cid:219)y = 0) is given by π = −r n + u (cid:48)(0)(y − yn). (10) So the Euler line is linear, upward sloping, and goes through the point [y = yn + r n/u(cid:48)(0), π = 0]. The Euler line has become upward sloping because the real monetary-policy rate, which was increasing with in(cid:28)ation when monetary policy was active, has become decreasing with in(cid:28)ation at the ZLB (r = −π ). Since r n ≤ 0, the Euler line has shi(cid:29)ed inward of the point [y = yn, π = 0], explaining why the central bank is unable to achieve the natural steady state at the ZLB. And since the slope of the Euler line is u(cid:48)(0) while that of the Phillips line is κ/(δγ a), the WUNK 11 condition (9) ensures that the Euler line is steeper than the Phillips line at the ZLB. From the Euler and Phillips lines, we infer that the Euler-Phillips system admits a unique steady state, in which in(cid:28)ation is negative and output is below its natural level.6 Second, the differential equation shows that any point above the Euler line has (cid:219)y < 0, and any point below it has (cid:219)y > 0. Hence, in all four quadrants of the phase diagram, the trajectories move away from the steady state. We conclude that the Euler-Phillips system is a source. At the ZLB, the Euler-Phillips system therefore behaves very differently in the NK and WUNK models. With passive monetary policy in normal times, the phase diagrams of the Euler-Phillips system would be similar to the ZLB phase diagrams -- except that the Euler and Phillips lines would intersect at [y = yn, π = 0]. In particular, the Euler-Phillips system would be a saddle in the NK model and a source in the WUNK model. For completeness, we also plot sample solutions to the Euler-Phillips system. The trajectories are obtained by linearizing the Euler-Phillips system at its steady state.7 When the system is a source, there are two unstable lines (trajectories that move away from the steady state in a straight line). At t → −∞, all other trajectories are in the vicinity of the steady state and move away tangentially to one of the unstable lines. At t → +∞, the trajectories move to in(cid:27)nity parallel to the other unstable line. When the system is a saddle, there is one unstable line and one stable line (trajectory that goes to the steady state in a straight line). All other trajectories come from in(cid:27)nity parallel to the stable line when t → −∞, and move to in(cid:27)nity parallel to the unstable line when t → +∞. The next propositions summarize the results: Proposition 1. Consider the Euler-Phillips system in normal times. The system admits a unique steady state, where output is at its natural level, in(cid:30)ation is zero, and the ZLB is not binding. In the NK model, the system is a source when monetary policy is active but a saddle when monetary policy is passive. In the WUNK model, the system is a source whether monetary policy is active or passive. Proposition 2. Consider the Euler-Phillips system at the ZLB. In the NK model, the system admits a unique steady state, where output is above its natural level and in(cid:30)ation is positive; furthermore, the system is a saddle. In the WUNK model, the system admits a unique steady state, where output is below its natural level and in(cid:30)ation is negative; furthermore, the system is a source. 6We also check that the intersection of the Euler and Phillips lines has positive output (appendix D). 7Technically the trajectories only approximate the exact solutions; but the approximation is accurate in the neighborhood of the steady state. 12 The propositions give the key difference between the NK and WUNK models: at the ZLB, the Euler-Phillips system remains a source in the WUNK model, whereas it becomes a saddle in the NK model. This difference will explain why the WUNK model does not suffer from the anomalies plaguing the NK model at the ZLB. The phase diagrams also illustrate the origin of the WUNK condition (9). In the WUNK model, the Euler-Phillips system remains a source at the ZLB as long as the Euler line is steeper than the Phillips line ((cid:27)gure 1, panel D). The Euler line's slope at the ZLB is the marginal utility of wealth, so that marginal utility is required to be above a certain level -- which is given by (9). The propositions have implications for equilibrium determinacy. When the Euler-Phillips system is a source, the equilibrium is determinate: the only equilibrium trajectory in the vicinity of the steady state is to jump to the steady state and stay there; if the economy jumped somewhere else, output or in(cid:28)ation would diverge following a trajectory similar to those plotted in panels A, B, and D of (cid:27)gure 1. When the system is a saddle, the equilibrium is indeterminate: any trajectory jumping somewhere on the saddle path and converging to the steady state is an equilibrium ((cid:27)gure 1, panel C). Hence, in the NK model, the equilibrium is determinate when monetary policy is active but indeterminate when monetary policy is passive and at the ZLB. In the WUNK model, the equilibrium is always determinate, even when monetary policy is passive and at the ZLB. Accordingly, in the NK model, the Taylor principle holds: the central bank must adhere to an active monetary policy to avoid indeterminacy. From now on, we therefore assume that the central bank in the NK model follows an active policy whenever it can (ϕ > 1 whenever r n > 0). In the WUNK model, by contrast, indeterminacy is never a risk, so the central bank does not need to worry about how strongly its policy rate responds to in(cid:28)ation. The central bank could even follow an interest-rate peg without creating indeterminacy. The results that pertain to the NK model in propositions 1 and 2 are well-known (for example, Woodford 2001). The results that pertain to the WUNK model are close to those obtained by Gabaix (2016, proposition 3.1), although he does not use our phase-diagram representation. Gabaix (cid:27)nds that when bounded rationality is strong enough, the Euler-Phillips system is a source even at the ZLB. He also (cid:27)nds that when prices are more (cid:28)exible, more bounded rationality is required to maintain the source property. The same is true here: when the marginal utility of wealth is high enough, such that (9) holds, the Euler-Phillips system is a source even at the ZLB; and when the price-adjustment cost γ is lower, (9) imposes a higher threshold on the marginal utility of wealth. Our phase diagrams illustrate the logic behind these results. The Euler-Phillips system remains a source at the ZLB as long as the Euler line is steeper than the Phillips line ((cid:27)gure 1, panel D). As the slope of the Euler line is determined by bounded rationality in the Gabaix model and by marginal utility of wealth in our model, these need to be large enough. When prices are more 13 (cid:28)exible, the Phillips line steepens, so the Euler line's required steepness increases: bounded rationality or marginal utility of wealth need to be larger. 4. Description and Resolution of the New Keynesian Anomalies We now describe the anomalous predictions of the NK model at the ZLB: implausibly large drop in output and in(cid:28)ation; and implausibly strong effects of forward guidance and government spending. We then show that these anomalies are absent from the WUNK model. 4.1. Drop in Output and In(cid:28)ation We consider a temporary ZLB episode, as in Werning (2011). Between times 0 and T > 0, the natural rate of interest is negative. In response, the central bank maintains its policy rate at zero. A(cid:29)er time T , the natural rate is positive again, and monetary policy returns to normal. This scenario is summarized in table 1, panel A. We analyze the ZLB episode using the phase diagrams in (cid:27)gure 2. We start with the NK model. We analyze the ZLB episode by going backward in time. A(cid:29)er time T , monetary policy maintains the economy at the natural steady state. Since equilibrium trajectories are continuous, the economy also is at the natural steady state at the end of the ZLB, when t = T .8 We then move back to the ZLB episode, when t < T . At time 0, the economy jumps to the unique position leading to [y = yn, π = 0] at time T . Hence, in(cid:28)ation and output initially jump down to π(0) < 0 and y(0) < yn, and then recover following the unique trajectory leading to [y = yn, π = 0]. The ZLB therefore creates a slump, with below-natural output and de(cid:28)ation (panel A). Critically, the economy is always on the same trajectory during the ZLB, irrespective of the ZLB duration T . A longer ZLB only forces output and in(cid:28)ation to start from a lower position on the trajectory at time 0. Thus, as the ZLB lasts longer, initial output and in(cid:28)ation collapse to unboundedly low levels (panel C). Now let us examine the WUNK model. Output and in(cid:28)ation never collapse during the ZLB. Initially in(cid:28)ation and output jump down toward the ZLB steady state, denoted [yz, π z], so π z < π(0) < 0 and yz < y(0) < yn. They then recover following the trajectory going through [y = yn, π = 0]. Consequently the ZLB episode creates a slump (panel B), which is deeper when the 8The trajectories are continuous in output and in(cid:28)ation because households have concave preferences over the two arguments. If consumption had an expected discrete jump, for example, households would be able to increase their utility by reducing the size of the discontinuity. 14 Table 1. ZLB Scenarios A. ZLB episode ZLB: Normal times: Timeline t ∈ (0,T) t > T B. ZLB episode with forward guidance ZLB: Forward guidance: Normal times: t ∈ (0,T) t ∈ (T ,T + ∆) t > T + ∆ C. ZLB episode with government spending ZLB: Normal times: t ∈ (0,T) t > T Natural rate of interest Monetary policy Government spending r n < 0 r n > 0 r n < 0 r n > 0 r n > 0 r n < 0 r n > 0 i = 0 i = r n + ϕπ i = 0 i = 0 i = r n + ϕπ i = 0 i = r n + ϕπ -- -- -- -- -- ❕ > 0 ❕ = 0 This table describes the three scenarios analyzed in section 4: the ZLB episode, in section 4.1; the ZLB episode with forward guidance, in section 4.2; and the ZLB episode with government spending, in section 4.3. The parameter T > 0 gives the duration of the ZLB episode; the parameter ∆ > 0 gives the duration of forward guidance. We assume that monetary policy is active (ϕ > 1) in normal times in the NK model; this assumption is required to ensure equilibrium determinacy (Taylor principle). In the WUNK model, monetary policy can be active or passive in normal times. 15 A. NK model: short ZLB B. WUNK model: short ZLB C. NK model: long ZLB D. WUNK model: long ZLB Figure 2. ZLB Episodes in the NK and WUNK Models The (cid:27)gure describes various ZLB episodes. The timeline of a ZLB episode is presented in table 1, panel A. Panel A displays the phase diagram of the NK model's Euler-Phillips system at the ZLB; it comes from (cid:27)gure 1, panel C. Panel B displays the phase diagram of the WUNK model's Euler-Phillips system at the ZLB; it comes from (cid:27)gure 1, panel D. Panels C and D are the same as panels A and B, but with a longer-lasting ZLB (larger T ). The equilibrium trajectories are the unique trajectories reaching the natural steady state (where π = 0 and y = yn) at time T . The (cid:27)gure shows that the economy slumps during the ZLB: in(cid:28)ation is negative and output is below its natural level (panels A and B). In the NK model, the initial slump becomes unboundedly severe as the ZLB lasts longer (panel C). In the WUNK model, there is no such collapse: output and in(cid:28)ation are bounded below by the ZLB steady state (panel D). 16 ZLB lasts longer (panel D). But unlike in the NK model, the slump is bounded below by the ZLB steady state: irrespective of the duration of the ZLB, output and in(cid:28)ation remain above yz and π z, respectively, so they never collapse. Moreover, if the natural rate of interest is negative but close to zero, such that π z is close to zero and yz to yn, output and in(cid:28)ation will barely deviate from the natural steady state during the ZLB -- even if the ZLB lasts a very long time. The following proposition records these results:9 Proposition 3. Consider a ZLB episode between times 0 and T . The economy enters a slump: y(t) < yn and π(t) < 0 for all t ∈ (0,T). In the NK model, the slump becomes in(cid:27)nitely severe as the ZLB duration approaches in(cid:27)nity: limT→∞ y(0) = limT→∞ π(0) = −∞. In the WUNK model, in contrast, the slump is bounded below by the ZLB steady state [yz, π z]: y(t) > yz and π(t) > π z for all t ∈ (0,T). In fact, the slump approaches the ZLB steady state as the ZLB duration approaches in(cid:27)nity: limT→∞ y(0) = yz and limT→∞ π(0) = π z. In the NK model, output and in(cid:28)ation collapse when the ZLB is long-lasting, which is well- known (Eggertsson and Woodford 2004, (cid:27)g. 1; Eggertsson 2011, (cid:27)g. 1; Werning 2011, proposition 1). This collapse is dif(cid:27)cult to reconcile with real-world observations. The ZLB episode that started in 1995 in Japan lasted for more than twenty years without sustained de(cid:28)ation. The ZLB episode that started in 2009 in the euro area lasted for more than 10 years; it did not yield sustained de(cid:28)ation either. The same is true of the ZLB episode that occurred in the United States between 2008 and 2015. In the WUNK model, in contrast, in(cid:28)ation and output never collapse. Instead, as the duration of the ZLB increases, the economy converges to the ZLB steady state. That ZLB steady state may not be far from the natural steady state: if the natural rate of interest is only slightly negative, in(cid:28)ation is only slightly below zero and output only slightly below its natural level. Gabaix (2016, proposition 3.2) obtains a closely related result: in his model output and in(cid:28)ation also converge to the ZLB steady state when the ZLB is arbitrarily long. 4.2. Forward Guidance We turn to the effects of forward guidance at the ZLB. We consider a three-stage scenario, as in Cochrane (2017). Between times 0 and T , there is a ZLB episode. To alleviate the situation, the central bank makes a forward-guidance promise at time 0: that it will maintain the policy rate at zero for a duration ∆ once the ZLB is over. A(cid:29)er time T , the natural rate of interest is positive 9The result that in the NK model output becomes in(cid:27)nitely negative when the ZLB becomes in(cid:27)nitely long should not be interpreted literally. It is obtained because we omitted the constraint that output must remain positive. The proper interpretation is that output falls much, much below its natural level -- in fact it converges to zero. 17 again. Between times T and T + ∆, the central bank ful(cid:27)lls its forward-guidance promise and keeps the policy rate at zero. A(cid:29)er time T + ∆, monetary policy returns to normal. This scenario is summarized in table 1, panel B. We analyze the ZLB episode with forward guidance using the phase diagrams in (cid:27)gures 3 and 4. The forward-guidance diagrams are based on the ZLB diagrams in (cid:27)gure 1. In the NK model ((cid:27)gure 3, panel A), the diagram is the same as in panel C of (cid:27)gure 1, except that the Euler line π = −r n is lower because r n > 0 instead of r n < 0. In the WUNK model ((cid:27)gure 4, panel A), the diagram is the same as in panel D of (cid:27)gure 1, except that the Euler line (10) is shi(cid:29)ed outward because r n > 0 instead of r n < 0. We begin with the NK model ((cid:27)gure 3). We go backward in time. A(cid:29)er time T + ∆, monetary policy maintains the economy at the natural steady state. Between timesT andT +∆, the economy is in forward guidance (panel A). Following the logic of (cid:27)gure 2, we (cid:27)nd that at time T , in(cid:28)ation is positive and output above its natural level. They subsequently decrease over time, following the unique trajectory leading to the natural steady state at time T + ∆. Accordingly, the economy booms during forward guidance. Furthermore, as forward guidance lengthens, in(cid:28)ation and output at time T become higher. We look next at the ZLB episode, between times 0 and T . Since equilibrium trajectories are continuous, the economy is at the same point at the end of the ZLB and at the beginning of forward guidance. The boom engineered during forward guidance therefore improves the situation at the ZLB. Instead of reaching the natural steady state at time T , the economy reaches a point with positive in(cid:28)ation and above-natural output, so at any time before T , in(cid:28)ation and output tend to be higher than without forward guidance (panel B). Forward guidance can actually have tremendously strong effects in the NK model. For small durations of forward guidance, the position at timeT is below the ZLB unstable line. It is therefore connected to trajectories coming from the southwest quadrant of the phase diagram (panel B). As the ZLB lasts longer, initial output and in(cid:28)ation collapse. When the duration of forward guidance is such that the position at time T is exactly on the unstable line, the position at time 0 is on the unstable line as well (panel C). As the ZLB lasts longer, the initial position inches closer to the ZLB steady state. For even longer forward guidance, the position at time T is above the unstable line, so it is connected to trajectories coming from the northeast quadrant (panel D). Then, as the ZLB lasts longer, initial output and in(cid:28)ation become higher and higher. As a result, if the duration of forward guidance is long enough, a deep slump can be transformed into a roaring boom. Moreover, the forward-guidance duration threshold is independent of the ZLB duration. In comparison, the power of forward guidance is subdued in the WUNK model ((cid:27)gure 4). Between times T and T + ∆, forward guidance operates (panel A). In(cid:28)ation is positive and output 18 A. Forward guidance B. ZLB with short forward guidance C. ZLB with medium forward guidance D. ZLB with long forward guidance Figure 3. NK Model: ZLB Episodes with Forward Guidance The (cid:27)gure describes various ZLB episodes with forward guidance in the NK model. The timeline of such episode is presented in table 1, panel B. Panel A displays the phase diagram of the NK model's Euler-Phillips system during forward guidance; it is similar to the diagram in (cid:27)gure 1, panel C but with r n > 0. The equilibrium trajectory during forward guidance is the unique trajectory reaching the natural steady state at time T + ∆. Panels B, C, and D display the phase diagram of the NK model's Euler-Phillips system at the ZLB; they comes from (cid:27)gure 1, panel C. The equilibrium trajectory at the ZLB is the unique trajectory reaching the point determined by forward guidance at time T . Panels B, C, and D differ in the underlying duration of forward guidance (∆): short in panel B, medium in panel C, and long in panel D. The (cid:27)gure shows that the NK model suffers from an anomaly: when forward guidance lasts suf(cid:27)ciently to bring [y(T), π(T)] above the unstable line, any ZLB episode -- however long -- triggers a boom (panel D). On the other hand, if forward guidance is short enough to keep [y(T), π(T)] below the unstable line, long-enough ZLB episodes are slumps (panel B). In the knife-edge case where [y(T), π(T)] falls just on the unstable line, arbitrarily long ZLB episodes converge to the ZLB steady state (panel C). 19 A. Forward guidance B. Short ZLB with forward guidance C. Long ZLB with forward guidance D. Possible trajectories Figure 4. WUNK Model: ZLB Episodes with Forward Guidance The (cid:27)gure describes various ZLB episodes with forward guidance in the WUNK model. The timeline of such episode is presented in table 1, panel B. Panel A displays the phase diagram of the WUNK model's Euler-Phillips system during forward guidance; it is similar to the diagram in (cid:27)gure 1, panel D but with r n > 0. The equilibrium trajectory during forward guidance is the unique trajectory reaching the natural steady state at time T + ∆. Panel B displays the phase diagram of the WUNK model's Euler-Phillips system at the ZLB; it comes from (cid:27)gure 1, panel D. The equilibrium trajectory at the ZLB is the unique trajectory reaching the point determined by forward guidance at time T . Panel C is the same as panel B, but with a longer-lasting ZLB (larger T ). Panel D is a generic version of panels A, B, and C, describing any duration of ZLB and forward guidance. The (cid:27)gure shows that the NK model's anomaly disappears in the WUNK model: a long-enough ZLB episode prompts a slump irrespective of the duration of forward guidance (panel C). 20 is above its natural level at time T . They then decrease over time, following the trajectory leading to the natural steady state at time T + ∆. The economy booms during forward guidance; but unlike in the NK model, output and in(cid:28)ation are bounded above by the forward-guidance steady state. Before forward guidance comes the ZLB episode (panels B and C). Thanks to the boom engineered by forward guidance, the situation is improved at the ZLB: in(cid:28)ation and output tend to be higher than without forward guidance. Yet, unlike in the NK model, output during the ZLB episode is always below its level at time T , so forward guidance cannot generate unbounded booms (panel D). The ZLB cannot generate unbounded slumps either, since output and in(cid:28)ation are bounded below by the ZLB steady state (panel D). Actually, for any forward-guidance duration, as the ZLB lasts longer, the economy converges to the ZLB steady state at time 0. The implication is that forward guidance can never prevent a slump when the ZLB lasts long enough. Based on these dynamics, we identify an anomaly in the NK model, which is resolved in the WUNK model (proof details in appendix D): Proposition 4. Consider a ZLB episode during(0,T) followed by forward guidance during(T ,T + ∆). • In the NK model, there exists a threshold ∆∗ such that a forward guidance longer than ∆∗ transforms a ZLB episode of any duration into a boom: let ∆ > ∆∗; for any T and for all t ∈ (0,T + ∆), y(t) > yn and π(t) > 0. In addition, when forward guidance is longer than ∆∗, a long-enough forward guidance or ZLB episode generates an arbitrarily large boom: for any T , lim∆→∞ y(0) = lim∆→∞ π(0) = +∞; and for any ∆ > ∆∗, limT→∞ y(0) = limT→∞ π(0) = +∞. • In the WUNK model, in contrast, there exists a threshold T ∗ such that a ZLB episode longer than T ∗ prompts a slump, irrespective of the duration of forward guidance: let T > T ∗; for any ∆, y(0) < yn and π(0) < 0. Furthermore, the slump approaches the ZLB steady state as the ZLB duration approaches in(cid:27)nity: for any ∆, limT→∞ y(0) = yz and limT→∞ π(0) = π z. In addition, the economy is bounded above by the forward-guidance steady state [y f , π f ]: for any T and ∆, and for all t ∈ (0,T + ∆), y(t) < y f and π(t) < π f . The anomaly identi(cid:27)ed in the proposition corresponds to the forward-guidance puzzle de- scribed by Carlstrom, Fuerst, and Paustian (2015, (cid:27)g. 1) and Cochrane (2017, (cid:27)g. 6).10 These papers also (cid:27)nd that a long-enough forward guidance transforms a ZLB slump into a boom. 10In the literature the forward-guidance puzzle takes several forms. The common element is that future monetary policy has an implausibly strong effect on current output and in(cid:28)ation. 21 In the WUNK model, this anomalous pattern vanishes. In the New Keynesian models by Gabaix (2016), Diba and Loisel (2019), Acharya and Dogra (2019), and Bilbiie (2019), forward guidance also has more subdued effects than in the standard model. Besides, New Keynesian models have been developed with the sole goal of solving the forward-guidance puzzle. Among these, ours belongs to the group that uses discounted Euler equations.11 For example, Del Negro, Giannoni, and Patterson (2015) generate discounting from overlapping generations; McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson (2016) from heterogeneous agents facing borrowing constraints and cyclical income risk; Angeletos and Lian (2018) from incomplete information; and Campbell et al. (2017) from government bonds in the utility function (which is closely related to our approach). 4.3. Government Spending Last we consider the effects of government spending at the ZLB. We (cid:27)rst extend the model by assuming that the government purchases goods from all households, which are aggregated into public consumption ❕(t). To ensure that government spending affects in(cid:28)ation and private consumption, we also assume that the disutility of labor is convex: household j incurs disutility 1+ηhj(t)1+η/(1 + η) from working, where η > 0 is the inverse of the Frisch elasticity. Complete κ extended model, derivations, and results are presented in appendix E. In this model, the Euler equation is unchanged, but the Phillips curve is modi(cid:27)ed because the marginal disutility of labor is not constant, and because households produce goods for the government. The modi(cid:27)cation of the Phillips curve alters the analysis in three ways. First, the steady-state Phillips curve becomes nonlinear, which may introduce additional steady states. We handle this issue as in the literature: we linearize the Euler-Phillips system around the natural steady state without government spending, and concentrate on the dynamics of the linearized system. These dynamics are described by phase diagrams similar to those in the basic model. Second, the slope of the steady-state Phillips curve is modi(cid:27)ed, so the WUNK assumption needs to be adjusted. Instead of (3), the linearized steady-state Phillips curve is (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) π = − κ δγ a [(1 + η)(c − cn) + η❕] . (11) The WUNK assumption guarantees that at the ZLB, the steady-state Euler equation (with slope u(cid:48)(0)) is steeper than the steady-state Phillips curve (now given by (11)). Hence, we need to replace 11Other approaches to solve the forward-guidance puzzle include modifying the Phillips curve (Carlstrom, Fuerst, and Paustian 2015), combining re(cid:28)ective expectations and temporary equilibrium (Garcia-Schmidt and Woodford 2019), combining bounded rationality and incomplete markets (Farhi and Werning 2019), and introducing an endogenous liquidity premium (Bredemeier, Kaufmann, and Schabert 2018). 22 assumption (9) by (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) . u (cid:48)(0) > (1 + η) κ δγ a (12) Naturally, for η = 0, this assumption reduces to (9). Third, public consumption enters the Phillips curve, so government spending operates through that curve. Indeed, since η > 0 in (11), government spending shi(cid:29)s the steady-state Phillips curve upward. Intuitively, given private consumption, an increase in government spend- ing raises production and thus marginal costs. Facing higher marginal costs, producers augment in(cid:28)ation. We now study a ZLB episode during which the government increases spending in an effort to stimulate the economy, as in Cochrane (2017). Between times 0 and T , there is a ZLB episode. To alleviate the situation, the government provides an amount ❕ > 0 of public consumption. A(cid:29)er time T , the natural rate of interest is positive again, government spending stops, and monetary policy returns to normal. This scenario is summarized in table 1, panel C. We start with the NK model ((cid:27)gure 5).12 We construct the equilibrium path by going backward in time. At time T , monetary policy brings the economy to the natural steady state. At the ZLB, government spending helps, but through a different mechanism than forward guidance. Forward guidance improves the situation at the end of the ZLB, which pulls up the economy during the entire ZLB. Government spending leaves the end of the ZLB unchanged: the economy reaches the natural steady state. Instead, government spending shi(cid:29)s the Phillips line upward, and with it, the (cid:27)eld of trajectories. As a result, the natural steady state is connected to trajectories with higher consumption and in(cid:28)ation, which improves the situation during the entire ZLB (panel A versus panel B). Just like forward guidance, government spending can have very strong effects in the NK model. When spending is low, the natural steady state is below the ZLB unstable line (panel B). It is therefore connected to trajectories coming from the southwest quadrant of the phase diagram -- just as without government spending (panel A). Then, if the ZLB lasts longer, initial consumption and in(cid:28)ation fall lower. When spending is high enough that the unstable line crosses the natural steady state, the economy is also on the unstable line at time 0 (panel C). Finally, when spending is even higher, the natural steady state moves above the unstable line, so it is connected to trajectories coming from the northeast quadrant (panel D). As a result, initial output and in(cid:28)ation are higher than previously. And as the ZLB lasts longer, initial output and in(cid:28)ation become even higher, without bound. 12There is a small difference with the phase diagrams of the basic model: private consumption c is on the horizontal axis instead of output y. But y = c in the basic model (government spending is zero), so the phase diagrams with private consumption on the horizontal axis would be the same as those with output. 23 A. ZLB with no government spending B. ZLB with low government spending C. ZLB with medium government spending D. ZLB with high government spending Figure 5. NK Model: ZLB Episodes with Government Spending The (cid:27)gure describes various ZLB episodes with government spending in the NK model. The timeline of such episode is presented in table 1, panel C. The panels display the phase diagrams of the linearized Euler-Phillips system for the NK model with government spending and convex disutility of labor at the ZLB: c is private consumption; π is in(cid:28)ation; cn is the natural level of private consumption; the Euler line is the locus (cid:219)c = 0; the Phillips line is the locus (cid:219)π = 0. The phase diagrams have the same properties as that in (cid:27)gure 1, panel C, except that the Phillips line shi(cid:29)s upward when government spending increases (see equation (11)). The equilibrium trajectory at the ZLB is the unique trajectory reaching the natural steady state at time T . The four panels feature an increasing amount of government spending (❕), starting from ❕ = 0 in panel A. The (cid:27)gure shows that the NK model suffers from an anomaly: when government spending brings down the unstable line from above to below the natural steady state, an arbitrarily long ZLB episode sees an arbitrarily large increase in output, which triggers an unboundedly large boom (from panel B to panel D). On the other hand, if government spending is low enough to keep the unstable line above the natural steady state, long-enough ZLB episodes are slumps (panel B). In the knife-edge case where the natural steady state falls just on the unstable line, arbitrarily long ZLB episodes converge to the ZLB steady state (panel C). 24 A. ZLB with no government spending B. ZLB with low government spending C. ZLB with medium government spending D. ZLB with high government spending Figure 6. WUNK Model: ZLB Episodes with Government Spending The (cid:27)gure describes various ZLB episodes with government spending in the WUNK model. The timeline of such episode is presented in table 1, panel C. The panels display the phase diagrams of the linearized Euler-Phillips system for the WUNK model with government spending and convex disutility of labor at the ZLB: c is private consumption; π is in(cid:28)ation; cn is the natural level of private consumption; the Euler line is the locus (cid:219)c = 0; the Phillips line is the locus (cid:219)π = 0. The phase diagrams have the same properties as that in (cid:27)gure 1, panel D, except that the Phillips line shi(cid:29)s upward when government spending increases (see equation (11)). The equilibrium trajectory at the ZLB is the unique trajectory reaching the natural steady state at time T . The four panels feature an increasing amount of government spending (❕), starting from ❕ = 0 in panel A. The (cid:27)gure shows that the NK model's anomaly disappears in the WUNK model: the government-spending multiplier is (cid:27)nite when the ZLB becomes arbitrarily long-lasting; and equilibrium trajectories are bounded irrespective of the duration of the ZLB. 25 The power of government spending at the ZLB is much weaker in the WUNK model ((cid:27)gure 6). Government spending does improves the situation at the ZLB, as in(cid:28)ation and consumption tend to be higher than without spending. But as the ZLB lasts longer, the position at the beginning of the ZLB converges to the ZLB steady state -- unlike in the NK model, it does not go to in(cid:27)nity. So equilibrium trajectories are bounded, and government spending cannot generate unbounded booms. Based on these dynamics, we isolate another anomaly in the NK model, which is resolved in the WUNK model (proof details in appendix F): Proposition 5. Consider a ZLB episode during (0,T), accompanied by government spending ❕ > 0. Let c(t; ❕) and y(t; ❕) be private consumption and output at time t; let s > 0 be some incremental government spending; and let m(❕, s) = y(0; ❕ + s/2) − y(0; ❕ − s/2) s = 1 + c(0; ❕ + s/2) − c(0; ❕ − s/2) s be the government-spending multiplier. • In the NK model, there exists a government spending ❕∗ such that the government-spending multiplier becomes in(cid:27)nitely large when the ZLB duration approaches in(cid:27)nity: for any s > 0, limT→∞ m(❕∗, s) = +∞. In addition, when government spending is above ❕∗, a long-enough ZLB episode generates an arbitrarily large boom: for any ❕ > ❕∗, limT→∞ c(0; ❕) = +∞. • In the WUNK model, in contrast, the multiplier has a (cid:27)nite limit when the ZLB duration approaches in(cid:27)nity: for any ❕ and s, when T → ∞, m(❕, s) converges to (13) (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η) . η 1 + u(cid:48)(0)δγ a κ ·(cid:0) −1 Moreover, the economy is bounded above for any ZLB duration: let c❕ be private consumption in the ZLB steady state with government spending ❕; for any T and for all t ∈ (0,T), c(t; ❕) < max(c❕, cn). The anomaly that a (cid:27)nite amount of government spending may generate an in(cid:27)nitely large boom as the ZLB becomes arbitrarily long-lasting is reminiscent of the (cid:27)ndings by Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Rebelo (2011, (cid:27)g. 2), Woodford (2011, (cid:27)g. 2), and Cochrane (2017, (cid:27)g. 5). They (cid:27)nd that in the NK model government spending is exceedingly powerful when the ZLB is long- lasting. In the WUNK model, this anomaly vanishes. Diba and Loisel (2019) and Acharya and Dogra (2019) also obtain more realistic effects of government spending at the ZLB. In addition, Brede- 26 meier, Juessen, and Schabert (2018) obtain moderate multipliers at the ZLB by introducing an endogenous liquidity premium in the New Keynesian model. 5. Other New Keynesian Properties at the ZLB Beside the anomalous properties described in section 4, the New Keynesian model has sev- eral other intriguing properties at the ZLB: the paradoxes of thri(cid:29), toil, and (cid:28)exibility; and a government-spending multiplier greater than one. We now show that the WUNK model shares these properties. In the NK model these properties are studied in the context of a temporary ZLB episode. An advantage of the WUNK model is that we can simply work with a permanent ZLB episode. We assume that the natural rate of interest is permanently negative, and the central bank keeps the policy rate at zero forever. The only equilibrium is at the ZLB steady state, where the economy is in a slump: in(cid:28)ation is negative and output is below its natural level. The ZLB equilibrium is represented in (cid:27)gure 7: it is the intersection of a Phillips line, describing the steady-state Phillips curve, and an Euler line, describing the steady-state Euler equation. When an unexpected and permanent shock occurs, the economy jumps to a new ZLB steady state; we use the graphs to study such jumps. 5.1. Paradox of Thri(cid:29) We (cid:27)rst study an increase in the marginal utility of wealth (u(cid:48)(0)). The steady-state Phillips curve is unaffected, but the steady-state Euler equation changes. Using (5), we rewrite the steady-state Euler equation (10): π = −δ + σ + u (cid:48)(0)y . Increasing the marginal utility of wealth steepens the Euler line, which moves the economy inward along the Phillips line. Output and in(cid:28)ation therefore decrease ((cid:27)gure 7, panel A). The following proposition gives the results: Proposition 6. At the ZLB in the WUNK model, the paradox of thrift holds: an unexpected and permanent increase in the marginal utility of wealth reduces output and in(cid:30)ation but does not a(cid:29)ect relative wealth. The paradox of thri(cid:29) was (cid:27)rst discussed by Keynes, but it also appears in the New Keynesian model (Eggertsson 2010, p. 16; Eggertsson and Krugman 2012, p. 1486). When the marginal utility of wealth is higher, people want to increase their wealth holdings relative to their peers, so they favor saving over consumption. But in equilibrium, relative wealth is (cid:27)xed at zero because 27 everybody is the same; the only way to increase saving relative to consumption is to reduce consumption. In normal times, the central bank would offset this drop in aggregate demand by reducing nominal interest rates. This is not an option at the ZLB, so output falls. 5.2. Paradox of Toil Next we consider a reduction in the disutility of labor (κ). In this case, the steady-state Phillips curve changes while the steady-state Euler equation does not. Using (2), we rewrite the steady-state Phillips curve (3): y − − 1 . π = κ δγ a δγ Reducing the disutility of labor (cid:28)attens the Phillips line, which moves the economy inward along the Euler line. Thus, both output and in(cid:28)ation decrease ((cid:27)gure 7, panel B). Since hours worked and output are related by h = y/a, hours fall as well. The following proposition states the results: Proposition 7. At the ZLB in the WUNK model, the paradox of toil holds: an unexpected and permanent reduction in the disutility of labor reduces output, in(cid:30)ation, and hours worked. The paradox of toil was discovered by Eggertsson (2010, p. 15) and Eggertsson and Krugman (2012, p. 1487). It operates as follows. With lower disutility of labor, real marginal costs are lower, and the natural level of output is higher: producers would like to sell more. To increase sales, they reduce their prices by reducing in(cid:28)ation. At the ZLB, nominal interest rates are (cid:27)xed, so the decrease in in(cid:28)ation raises real interest rates -- which renders households more prone to save. In equilibrium, this lowers output and hours worked.13 5.3. Paradox of Flexibility We then examine a decrease in the price-adjustment cost (γ ). The steady-state Euler equation is not affected, but the steady-state Phillips curve is. Equation (3) shows that decreasing the price-adjustment cost leads to a counterclockwise rotation of the Phillips line around the natural steady state. This moves the economy downward along the Euler line, so output and in(cid:28)ation decrease ((cid:27)gure 7, panel C). The following proposition records the results: Proposition 8. At the ZLB in the WUNK model, the paradox of (cid:30)exibility holds: an unexpected and permanent decrease in price-adjustment cost reduces output and in(cid:30)ation. 13An increase in technology (a) would have the same effect as a reduction in the disutility of labor: it would lower output, in(cid:28)ation, and hours. 28 A. Paradox of thri(cid:29) B. Paradox of toil C. Paradox of (cid:28)exibility D. Above-one government-spending multiplier Figure 7. WUNK model: Other Properties at the ZLB The (cid:27)gure describes four comparative statics of the WUNK model at the ZLB. In panels A, B, and C, the Euler and Phillips lines are the same as in (cid:27)gure 1, panel D. In panel D, the Euler and Phillips lines are the same as in (cid:27)gure 6. The ZLB equilibrium is at the intersection of the Euler and Phillips lines: output/consumption is below its natural level and in(cid:28)ation is negative. Panel A illustrates the paradox of thri(cid:29): increasing the marginal utility of wealth steepens the Euler line, which depresses output and in(cid:28)ation without changing relative wealth. Panel B illustrates the paradox of toil: reducing the disutility of labor moves the Phillips line outward, which depresses output, in(cid:28)ation, and hours worked. Panel C illustrates the paradox of (cid:28)exibility: decreasing the price-adjustment cost rotates the Phillips line counterclockwise around the natural steady state, which depresses output and in(cid:28)ation. Panel D shows that the government-spending multiplier is above one: increasing government spending shi(cid:29)s the Phillips line upward, which raises private consumption and therefore increases output more than one-for-one. 29 The paradox of (cid:28)exibility was discovered by Werning (2011, pp. 13 -- 14) and Eggertsson and Krugman (2012, pp. 1487 -- 1488). Intuitively, with a lower price-adjustment cost, producers are keener to adjust their prices to bring production closer to the natural level of output. Since production is below the natural level at the ZLB, producers are keener to reduce their prices to stimulate sales. This accentuates the existing de(cid:28)ation, which translates into higher real interest rates. As a result, households are more prone to save, which in equilibrium depresses output. 5.4. Above-One Government-Spending Multiplier We (cid:27)nally look at an increase in government spending (❕), using the model with government spending introduced in section 4.3. From (11) we see that increasing government spending shi(cid:29)s the Phillips line upward, which moves the economy upward along the Euler line: both private consumption and in(cid:28)ation increase ((cid:27)gure 7, panel D). Since private consumption increases when public consumption does, the government-spending multiplier dy/d❕ = 1 + dc/d❕ is greater than one. The ensuing proposition gives the results (proof details in appendix F): Proposition 9. At the ZLB in the WUNK model, an unexpected and permanent increase in gov- ernment spending raises private consumption and in(cid:30)ation. Hence the government-spending mul- tiplier dy/d❕ is above one; its value is given by (13). Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Rebelo (2011), Eggertsson (2011), and Woodford (2011) also show that at the ZLB in the New Keynesian model, the government-spending multiplier is above one. The intuition is the following. With higher government spending, real marginal costs are higher for a given level of sales to households. Producers pass the cost increase through into prices, which raises in(cid:28)ation. At the ZLB, the increase in in(cid:28)ation lowers real interest rates -- as nominal interest rates are (cid:27)xed -- which deters households from saving. In equilibrium, this leads to higher private consumption and a multiplier above one. 6. Empirical Assessment of the WUNK Assumption In the WUNK model, the marginal utility of wealth is assumed to be high enough that the steady- state Euler equation is steeper than the steady-state Phillips curve at the ZLB. We assess this assumption using US evidence. As a (cid:27)rst step, we re-express the WUNK assumption in terms of estimable statistics. We obtain the following condition (derivations in appendix G): δ − r n > λ δ , 30 (14) where δ is the time discount rate, r n is the average natural rate of interest, and λ is the coef(cid:27)cient on output gap in a New Keynesian Phillips curve. The term δ − r n measures the marginal rate of substitution between wealth and consumption, u(cid:48)(0)yn. It indicates how high the marginal utility of wealth is and thus how steep the steady-state Euler equation is at the ZLB. The term λ/δ indicates how steep the steady-state Phillips curve is. The δ comes from the denominator of the slopes of the Phillips curves (3) and (11); the λ measures the rest of the slope coef(cid:27)cients. Condition (14) is expressed in terms of suf(cid:27)cient statistics, so it applies both when the disutility of labor is linear (in which case it is equivalent to (9)) and when the disutility of labor is convex (in which case it is equivalent to (12)). We now survey the literature to obtain estimates of r n, λ, and δ. 6.1. Natural Rate of Interest A large number of macroeconometric studies have estimated the natural rate of interest, using different statistical models, methodologies, and data. Recent studies obtain comparable estimates of the natural rate for the United States: around 2% per annum on average between 1985 and 2015 (Williams 2017, (cid:27)g. 1). Accordingly, we use r n = 2% as our estimate. 6.2. Output-Gap Coef(cid:27)cient in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve Many studies have estimated New Keynesian Phillips curves. Mavroeidis, Plagborg-Moller, and Stock (2014, sec. 5) offer a synthesis for the United States. They generate estimates of the New Keynesian Phillips curve using an array of US data, methods, and speci(cid:27)cations found in the literature. They (cid:27)nd signi(cid:27)cant uncertainty around the estimates, but in many cases the output- gap coef(cid:27)cient is positive and very small. Overall, their median estimate of the output-gap coef(cid:27)cient is λ = 0.004 (table 5, row 1), which we use as our estimate. 6.3. Time Discount Rate Since the 1970s, many studies have estimated time discount rates using (cid:27)eld and laboratory experiments and real-world behavior. Frederick, Loewenstein, and O'Donoghue (2002, table 1) survey 43 such studies. The estimates are quite dispersed, but the majority of them points to high discount rates, much higher than prevailing market interest rates. We compute the mean estimate in each of the studies covered by the survey, and then compute the median value of these means. We obtain an annual discount rate of δ = 35%. There is one immediate limitation with the studies discussed by Frederick, Loewenstein, and O'Donoghue: they use a single rate to exponentially discount future utility. But exponential 31 discounting does not describe reality well because people seem to choose more impatiently for the present than for the future -- they exhibit present-focused preferences (Ericson and Laibson 2019). Recent studies have moved away from exponential discounting and allowed for present-focused preferences, including quasi-hyperbolic (β-δ) discounting. Andersen et al. (2014, table 3) survey 16 such studies, concentrating on experimental studies with real incentives. We compute the mean estimate in each study and then the median value of these means; we obtain an annual discount rate of δ = 43%. Accordingly, even a(cid:29)er accounting for present-focus, time discounting remains high. We use δ = 43% as our estimate.14 6.4. Assessment We now combine our estimates of r n, λ, and δ to assess the WUNK assumption. Since λ is estimated using quarters as units of time, we re-express r n and δ as quarterly rates: r n = 2%/4 = 0.5% per quarter, and δ = 43%/4 = 10.8% per quarter. We conclude that (14) comfortably holds: δ − r n = 0.108 − 0.005 = 0.103, which is much larger than λ/δ = 0.004/0.108 = 0.037. Hence the WUNK assumption holds in US data. The discount rate used here (43% per annum) is much higher than discount rates used in macroeconomic models (typically less than 5% per annum). This is because our discount rate is calibrated from microevidence, while the discount rate in macroeconomic models is calibrated to match observed real interest rates. This discrepancy occasions two remarks. First, the wealth-in-the-utility assumption is ad- vantageous because it accords with the fact that people exhibit double-digit time discount rates and yet are willing to save at single-digit interest rates. In the standard model, by contrast, the discount rate necessarily equals the real interest rate in steady state, so the model cannot have δ (cid:29) 5%. 14There are two potential issues with the experiments discussed in Andersen et al. (2014). First, many are run with university students instead of subjects representative of the general population. There does not seem to be systematic differences in discounting between student and non-student subjects, however (Cohen et al. 2019, sec. 6A). Hence, using students is unlikely to bias the estimates reported by Andersen et al.. Second, all the experiments elicit discount rates using (cid:27)nancial (cid:28)ows, not consumption (cid:28)ows. As the goal is to elicit the discount rate on consumption, this could be problematic (Cohen et al. 2019, sec. 4B); the problems could be exacerbated if subjects derive utility from wealth. To assess this potential issue, suppose (cid:27)rst (as in most of the literature) that monetary payments are consumed at the time of receipt, and that the utility function is locally linear. Then the experiments deliver estimates of the relevant discount rate (Cohen et al. 2019, sec. 4B). If these conditions do not hold, the experimental (cid:27)ndings are more dif(cid:27)cult to interpret. For instance, if subjects optimally smooth their consumption over time by borrowing and saving, then the experiments only elicit the interest rate faced by subjects, and reveal nothing about their discount rate (Cohen et al. 2019, sec. 4B). In that case, we should rely on experiments using time-dated consumption rewards instead of monetary rewards. Such experiments directly deliver estimates of the discount rate. Many such experiments have been conducted; a robust (cid:27)nding is that discount rates are systematically higher for consumption rewards than for monetary rewards (Cohen et al. 2019, sec. 3A). Hence, the estimates presented in Andersen et al. are, if anything, lower bounds on actual discount rates. 32 Second, the WUNK assumption would also hold with discount rates below 43%. Indeed, (14) holds for discount rates as low as 27% because δ − r n = (0.27/4) − 0.005 = 0.062 is greater than λ/δ = 0.004/(0.27/4) = 0.059. An annual discount rate of 27% is at the low end of available microestimates: in 11 of the 16 studies in Andersen et al. (2014, table 3), the bottom of the estimate range is above 27%; and in 13 of the 16 studies, the mean estimate is above 27%. Finally, while our model omits (cid:27)rms and assumes that households are both producers and consumers, in reality (cid:27)rms and households are o(cid:29)en separate entities that could have different discount rates. With different discount rates, (14) would become δ h − r n > λ δ f , where δ h is households' discount rate and δ f is (cid:27)rms' discount rate. Clearly, if (cid:27)rms have a low discount rate, the WUNK assumption is less likely to be satis(cid:27)ed. If we use δ h = 43%, r n = 2%, and λ = 0.004, we (cid:27)nd that the WUNK condition holds as long as (cid:27)rms have an annual discount rate above 16% because δ h − r n = (0.43/4) − 0.005 = 0.103 is greater than λ/δ f = 0.004/(0.16/4) = 0.100. A discount rate of 16% is only slightly above that reported by large US (cid:27)rms: in a survey of 228 CEOs, Poterba and Summers (1995) (cid:27)nd an average annual real discount rate of 12.2%; and in a survey of 86 CFOs, Jagannathan et al. (2016, p. 447) (cid:27)nd an average annual real discount rate of 12.7%. 7. Conclusion This paper proposes an extension of the New Keynesian model that is immune to the anomalies that plague the standard model at the ZLB. The extended model deviates only minimally from the standard model: relative wealth enters the utility function, which only adds an extra term in the Euler equation. Yet, when the marginal utility of wealth is suf(cid:27)ciently high, the model behaves well at the ZLB: even when the ZLB is long-lasting, there is no collapse of in(cid:28)ation and output, and both forward guidance and government spending have limited, plausible effects. The extended model also retains other properties of the standard model at the ZLB: the paradoxes of thri(cid:29), toil, and (cid:28)exibility; and a government-spending multiplier greater than one. Our analysis would apply more generally to any New Keynesian model representable by a discounted Euler equation and a Phillips curve (for example, Del Negro, Giannoni, and Patterson 2015; Gabaix 2016; McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson 2017; Campbell et al. 2017; Beaudry and Portier 2018; Angeletos and Lian 2018). Wealth in the utility function is a simple way to generate discounting; but any model with discounting would have similar phase diagrams and properties. 33 Hence, for such models to behave well at the ZLB, there is only one requirement: that discounting is strong enough to make the steady-state Euler equation steeper than the steady-state Phillips curve at the ZLB; the source of discounting is unimportant. In the real world, several discounting mechanisms might operate at the same time and reinforce each other. A model blending these mechanisms would be even more likely to behave well at the ZLB. References Acemoglu, Daron. 2009. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Acharya, Sushant, and Keshav Dogra. 2019. "Understanding HANK: Insights from a PRANK." https://perma. cc/E5JY-HL55. Andersen, Steffen, Glenn W. Harrison, Morten I. Lau, and E. Elisabet Rutstrom. 2014. "Discounting Behavior: A Reconsideration." European Economic Review 71: 15 -- 33. Anderson, Cameron, John A.D. Hildreth, and Laura Howland. 2015. "Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature." Psychological Bulletin 141 (3): 574 -- 601. Angeletos, George-Marios, and Chen Lian. 2018. "Forward Guidance without Common Knowledge." Ameri- can Economic Review 108 (9): 2477 -- 2512. Bakshi, Gurdip S., and Zhiwu Chen. 1996. "The Spirit of Capitalism and Stock-Market Prices." American Economic Review 86 (1): 133 -- 157. Beaudry, Paul, and Franck Portier. 2018. "Real Keynesian Models and Sticky Prices." NBER Working Paper 24223. Benhabib, Jess, Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe, and Martin Uribe. 2001. "The Perils of Taylor Rules." Journal of Economic Theory 96 (1-2): 40 -- 69. Bilbiie, Florin O. 2019. "Heterogeneity and Determinacy: An Analytical Framework." CEPR Discussion Paper 12601. Blanchard, Olivier J., and Stanley Fischer. 1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bredemeier, Christian, Falko Juessen, and Andreas Schabert. 2018. "Fiscal Multipliers and Monetary Policy: Reconciling Theory and Evidence." https://perma.cc/6ZER-P2UD. Bredemeier, Christian, Christoph Kaufmann, and Andreas Schabert. 2018. "Interest Rate Spreads and Forward Guidance." ECB Working Paper 2186. Calvo, Guillermo A. 1983. "Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework." Journal of Monetary Economics 12 (3): 383 -- 398. Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec. 2005. "Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics." Journal of Economic Literature 43 (1): 9 -- 64. Campbell, Jeffrey R., Jonas D.M. Fisher, Alejandro Justiniano, and Leonardo Melosi. 2017. "Forward Guid- ance and Macroeconomic Outcomes Since the Financial Crisis." In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2016, edited by Martin Eichenbaum and Jonathan A. Parker, chap. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Carlstrom, Charles T., Timothy S. Fuerst, and Matthias Paustian. 2015. "In(cid:28)ation and Output in New Keynesian Models with a Transient Interest Rate Peg." Journal of Monetary Economics 76: 230 -- 243. 34 Carroll, Christopher D. 2000. "Why Do the Rich Save So Much?" In Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, edited by Joel B. Slemrod. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cheng, Joey T., and Jessica L. Tracy. 2013. "The Impact of Wealth on Prestige and Dominance Rank Relationships." Psychological Inquiry 24 (2): 102 -- 108. Christiano, Lawrence, Martin Eichenbaum, and Sergio Rebelo. 2011. "When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large?." Journal of Political Economy 119 (1): 78 -- 121. Clemens, Christiane. 2004. "Status, Risk-Taking and Intertemporal Substitution in an Endogenous Growth Model." Journal of Economics 83 (2): 103 -- 123. Cochrane, John H. 2017. "The New-Keynesian Liquidity Trap." Journal of Monetary Economics 92: 47 -- 63. Cochrane, John H. 2018. "Michelson-Morley, Fisher, and Occam: The Radical Implications of Stable Quiet In(cid:28)ation at the Zero Bound." In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2017, edited by Martin Eichenbaum and Jonathan A. Parker, chap. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cohen, Jonathan D., Keith M. Ericson, David Laibson, and John M. White. 2019. "Measuring Time Prefer- ences." Journal of Economic Perspectives forthcoming. Cole, Harold L., George J. Mailath, and Andrew Postlewaite. 1992. "Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth." Journal of Political Economy 100 (6): 1092 -- 1125. Cole, Harold L., George J. Mailath, and Andrew Postlewaite. 1995. "Incorporating Concern for Relative Wealth Into Economic Models." Quarterly Review 19 (3): 12 -- 21. Corneo, Giacomo, and Olivier Jeanne. 1997. "On Relative Wealth Effects and the Optimality of Growth." Economics Letters 54 (1): 87 -- 92. Del Negro, Marco, Marc P. Giannoni, and Christina Patterson. 2015. "The Forward Guidance Puzzle." Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 574. Diba, Behzad, and Olivier Loisel. 2019. "Pegging the Interest Rate on Bank Reserves: A Resolution of New Keynesian Puzzles and Paradoxes." https://perma.cc/U6RL-7PDM. Eggertsson, Gauti B. 2010. "The Paradox of Toil." Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 443. Eggertsson, Gauti B. 2011. "What Fiscal Policy is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?" In NBER Macroeconomic Annual 2010, edited by Daron Acemoglu and Michael Woodford, chap. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Eggertsson, Gauti B., and Paul Krugman. 2012. "Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher- Minsky-Koo Approach." Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1469 -- 1513. Eggertsson, Gauti B., Neil R. Mehrotra, and Jacob A. Robbins. 2019. "A Model of Secular Stagnation: Theory and Quantitative Evaluation." American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11 (1): 1 -- 48. Eggertsson, Gauti B., and Michael Woodford. 2004. "Policy Options in a Liquidity Trap." American Economic Review 94 (2): 76 -- 79. Ericson, Keith M., and David Laibson. 2019. "Intertemporal Choice." In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Applications, edited by B. Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, vol. 2, chap. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Farhi, Emmanuel, and Ivan Werning. 2019. "Monetary Policy, Bounded Rationality, and Incomplete Markets." American Economic Review 109 (11): 3887 -- 3928. Fisher, Irving. 1930. The Theory of Interest, as determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest it. New York: Macmillan. Fisher, Jonas D.M. 2015. "On the Structural Interpretation of the Smets-Wouters Risk Premium Shock." 35 Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 47 (2-3): 511 -- 516. Fisher, Walter H. 2005. "Current Account Dynamics in a Small Open-Economy Model of Status Seeking." Review of International Economics 13 (2): 262 -- 282. Fisher, Walter H., and Franz X. Hof. 2005. "Status Seeking in the Small Open Economy." Journal of Macroe- conomics 27 (2): 209 -- 232. Fiske, Susan T. 2010. "Interpersonal Strati(cid:27)cation: Status, Power, and Subordination." In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, vol. 2, chap. 26. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Francis, Johanna L. 2009. "Wealth and the Capitalist Spirit." Journal of Macroeconomics 31 (3): 394 -- 408. Frederick, Shane, George Loewenstein, and Ted O'Donoghue. 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Prefer- ence: A Critical Review." Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 351 -- 401. Futagami, Koichi, and Akihisa Shibata. 1998. "Keeping One Step Ahead of the Joneses: Status, the Dis- tribution of Wealth, and Long Run Growth." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 36 (1): 109 -- 126. Gabaix, Xavier. 2016. "A Behavioral New Keynesian Model." NBER Working Paper 22954. Gali, Jordi. 2008. Monetary Policy, In(cid:30)ation, and the Business Cycle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Garcia-Schmidt, Mariana, and Michael Woodford. 2019. "Are Low Interest Rates De(cid:28)ationary? A Paradox of Perfect-Foresight Analysis." American Economic Review 109 (1): 86 -- 120. Gong, Liutang, and Heng-fu Zou. 2002. "Direct Preferences for Wealth, the Risk Premium Puzzle, Growth, and Policy Effectiveness." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26 (2): 247 -- 270. Heffetz, Ori, and Robert H. Frank. 2011. "Preferences for Status: Evidence and Economic Implications." In Handbook of Social Economics, edited by Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew O. Jackson, vol. 1A, chap. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Hirsch, Morris W., Stephen Smale, and Robert L. Devaney. 2013. Di(cid:29)erential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos. 3rd ed. Boston: Academic Press. Jagannathan, Ravi, David A. Matsa, Iwan Meier, and Vefa Tarhan. 2016. "Why Do Firms Use High Discount Rates?" Journal of Financial Economics 120 (3): 445 -- 463. Kamihigashi, Takashi. 2008. "The Spirit of Capitalism, Stock Market Bubbles and Output Fluctuations." International Journal of Economic Theory 4 (1): 3 -- 28. Keynes, John Maynard. 1919. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan. Konrad, Kai A. 1992. "Wealth Seeking Reconsidered." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18 (2): 215 -- 227. Krishnamurthy, Arvind, and Annette Vissing-Jorgensen. 2012. "The Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt." Journal of Political Economy 120 (2): 233 -- 267. Kumhof, Michael, Romain Ranciere, and Pablo Winant. 2015. "Inequality, Leverage, and Crises." American Economic Review 105 (3): 1217 -- 1245. Kurz, Mordecai. 1968. "Optimal Economic Growth and Wealth Effects." International Economic Review 9 (3): 348 -- 357. Long, Ngo Van, and Koji Shimomura. 2004. "Relative Wealth, Status-Seeking, and Catching-Up." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 53 (4): 529 -- 542. Mattan, Bradley D., Jennifer T. Kubota, and Jasmin Cloutier. 2017. "How Social Status Shapes Person 36 Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective." Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (3): 468 -- 507. Mavroeidis, Sophocles, Mikkel Plagborg-Moller, and James H. Stock. 2014. "Empirical Evidence on In(cid:28)ation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve." Journal of Economic Literature 52 (1): 124 -- 188. McKay, Alisdair, Emi Nakamura, and Jon Steinsson. 2016. "The Power of Forward Guidance Revisited." American Economic Review 106 (10): 3133 -- 3158. McKay, Alisdair, Emi Nakamura, and Jon Steinsson. 2017. "The Discounted Euler Equation: A Note." Eco- nomica 84 (336): 820 -- 831. Michaillat, Pascal, and Emmanuel Saez. 2014. "An Economical Business-Cycle Model." NBER Working Paper 19777. Michau, Jean-Baptiste. 2018. "Secular Stagnation: Theory and Remedies." Journal of Economic Theory 176: 552 -- 618. Michau, Jean-Baptiste, Yoshiyasu Ono, and Matthias Schlegl. 2018. "Wealth Preference and Rational Bub- bles." CESifo Working Paper 7148. Ono, Yoshiyasu, and Katsunori Yamada. 2018. "Difference or Ratio: Implications of Status Preference on Stagnation." Australian Economic Papers 57 (3): 346 -- 362. Poterba, James M., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1995. "A CEO Survey of US Companies' Time Horizons and Hurdle Rates." MIT Sloan Management Review 37 (1): 43 -- 53. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2014. "Why Status Matters for Inequality." American Sociological Review 79 (1): 1 -- 16. Robson, Arthur J. 1992. "Status, the Distribution of Wealth, Private and Social Attitudes to Risk." Economet- rica 60 (4): 837 -- 857. Rotemberg, Julio J. 1982. "Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output." Review of Economic Studies 49 (4): 517 -- 531. Saez, Emmanuel, and Stefanie Stantcheva. 2018. "A Simpler Theory of Capital Taxation." Journal of Public Economics 162: 120 -- 142. Steedman, Ian. 1981. "Time Preference, the Rate of Interest and Abstinence from Accumulation." Australian Economic Papers 20 (37): 219 -- 234. Straub, Ludwig. 2019. "Consumption, Savings, and the Distribution of Permanent Income." https://perma. cc/ZU3P-7P7B. Weiss, Yoram, and Chaim Fershtman. 1998. "Social Status and Economic Performance: A Survey." European Economic Review 42: 801 -- 820. Werning, Ivan. 2011. "Managing a Liquidity Trap: Monetary and Fiscal Policy." NBER Working Paper 17344. Williams, John C. 2017. "Comment on 'Safety, Liquidity, and the Natural Rate of Interest'." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 48 (1): 295 -- 303. Woodford, Michael. 2001. "The Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy." American Economic Review 91 (2): 232 -- 237. Woodford, Michael. 2003. Interest and Prices. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Woodford, Michael. 2011. "Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier." American Eco- nomic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (1): 1 -- 35. Zou, Heng-fu. 1994. "The Spirit of Capitalism and Long-Run Growth." European Journal of Political Economy 10: 279 -- 293. Zou, Heng-fu. 1995. "The Spirit of Capitalism and Savings Behavior." Journal of Economic Behavior & 37 Organization 28: 131 -- 145. 38 Appendix A. Formal derivation of Euler equation & Phillips curve We derive the two differential equations that describe the equilibrium of the New Keynesian model with wealth in the utility function: the Phillips curve, given by (1); and the Euler equation, given by (4). We begin by solving household j's problem. The current-value Hamiltonian of the problem is A.1. Household's problem (cid:18)Þ 1 (cid:20) Hj = − 1 + Aj(t) ln 0 cjk(t)(−1)/ dk ih(t)bj(t) + pj(t)yd (cid:19) + u (cid:19) (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) Þ 1 p(t) − κ a j (pj(t), t) − γ yd (cid:21) 2 πj(t)2 + Bj(t)πj(t)pj(t), j (pj(t), t) − pk(t)cjk(t) dk − τ(t) 0 with control variables cjk(t) for all k ∈ [0, 1] and πj(t), state variables bj(t) and pj(t), and costate variables Aj(t) and Bj(t). Note that we have used the production and demand constraints to substitute yj(t) and hj(t) out of the Hamiltonian. (To ease notation we now drop the time index t.) We apply the necessary conditions for a maximum to the household's problem given by Ace- moglu (2009, theorem 7.9). These conditions form the basis of the model's equilibrium conditions. The (cid:27)rst optimality conditions are ∂Hj/∂cjk = 0 for all k ∈ [0, 1]. They yield = Ajpk . (A1) Appropriately integrating (A1) over all k ∈ [0, 1] and using the expressions for the consumption and price indices, (cid:19)−1/ (cid:18)cjk cj 1 cj (cid:20)Þ 1 (cid:20)Þ 1 0 0 (cid:21)/(−1) (cid:21) 1/(1−) , cjk(t)(−1)/ dk pj(t)1− di cj(t) = p(t) = we (cid:27)nd Aj = Moreover, combining (A1) and (A4), we obtain 1 . pcj (cid:19)− (cid:18)pk p 39 cjk = cj . (A2) (A3) (A4) (A5) Integrating (A5) over all j ∈ [0, 1], we get the usual demand for good k: where c =Þ 1 k(pk) = yd cjk dj = c, (A6) 0 cj dj is aggregate consumption. We use this expression for yd (pk) in household k's k Hamiltonian. Equation (A5) also implies that This means that when consumption expenditure is allocated optimally across goods, the price of one unit of consumption index is p. The second optimality condition is ∂Hj/∂bj = δAj − (cid:219)Aj, which gives Þ 1 0 Þ 1 (cid:19)− (cid:18)pk p (cid:19)− (cid:18)pk p Þ 1 0 pkcjk dk = pk 0 cj dk = pcj . (cid:48)(cid:18)bj − b (cid:48)(cid:18)bj − b p (cid:19) (cid:19) p − δ . − δ . − (cid:219)AjAj = ih + 1 pAj · u (cid:219)cj cj = i + σ − π + cju Using (A4) and ih = i + σ , we obtain the household's Euler equation: This equation describes the optimal path for household j's consumption. The third optimality condition is ∂Hj/∂πj = 0, which yields Bjpj = γ πj . Differentiating (A8) with respect to time, we obtain (cid:219)πj πj (cid:219)BjBj = − πj . The last optimality condition is ∂Hj/∂pj = δBj − (cid:219)Bj, which implies κ a · yj pj Reshuf(cid:28)ing the terms then yields − ( − 1)Ajyj + Bjπj = δBj − (cid:219)Bj . (cid:18) pj − − 1 · κ aAj (cid:19) = δ − (cid:219)BjBj . 40 πj − ( − 1)yjAj Bjpj (A7) (A8) (A9) Finally, incorporating (A4), (A8), and (A9), we obtain the household's Phillips curve: (cid:18)pj p (cid:19) (cid:219)πj πj = δ + ( − 1)yj γcjπj − − 1 · κcj a . (A10) This equation describes the optimal path for the price set by household j. A.2. Equilibrium We now describe the equilibrium of the model. Since all households face the same initial condi- tions, they all behave the same. We therefore drop the subscripts j and k on all the variables. In particular, all households hold the same wealth, so relative wealth is zero: bj = b. In addition, production and consumption are equal in equilibrium: y = c. Accordingly, the household's Phillips curve, given by (A10), simpli(cid:27)es to where (cid:219)π = δπ − κ γ a (y − yn) , yn = − 1 · a κ . And the household's Euler equation, given by (A7), simpli(cid:27)es to where r = i − π and (cid:219)y y = r − r n + u (cid:48)(0)(y − yn), r n = δ − σ − u (cid:48)(0)yn. These differential equations are the Phillips curve (1) and Euler equation (4). (A11) (A12) Appendix B. Heuristic derivation of Euler equation & Phillips curve To better understand and interpret the continuous-time Euler equation and Phillips curve, we complement the formal derivations of appendix A with heuristic derivations, as in Blanchard and Fischer (1989, pp. 40 -- 42). B.1. Euler equation The Euler equation says that households save in an optimal fashion: they cannot improve their situation by shi(cid:29)ing consumption a little bit across time. 41 Consider a household delaying consumption of one unit of output from time t to time t + dt. The unit of output, invested at a real interest rate r h(t), becomes 1 + r h(t)dt at time t + dt. Given log consumption utility, the marginal utility from consumption at any time t is e−δt/y(t). Hence, the household forgoes e−δt/y(t) utils at time t and gains [1 + r h(t)dt] e−δ(t +dt) y(t + dt) utils at time t + dt. Since people enjoy holding wealth, the one unit of output saved between t and t + dt provides hedonic returns in addition to (cid:27)nancial returns. The marginal utility from real wealth at time t is e−δtu(cid:48)(0). Hence, by holding an extra unit of real wealth for a duration dt, the household gains e−δtu(cid:48)(0)dt utils. At the optimum, reallocating consumption over time does not affect utility, so the following y(t) +(cid:2)1 + r h(t)dt(cid:3) e−δ(t +dt) y(t + dt) + e 0 = −e−δt −δtu (cid:48)(0)dt . holds: Divided by e−δt/y(t), this condition becomes 1 = [1 + r h(t)dt]e −δdt y(t) y(t + dt) + u (cid:48)(0)y(t)dt . Furthermore, up to second-order terms, the following approximations are valid: e y(t + dt) −δdt = 1 − δdt (cid:219)y(t) = 1 + y(t)dt = 1 − xdt, y(t) 1 1 + xdt 1 =(cid:2)1 + r h(t)dt(cid:3) (1 − δdt) (cid:20) for any x . (cid:21) 1 − (cid:219)y(t) y(t)dt (cid:48)(0)y(t)dt . + u Hence, up to second-order terms, the previous condition gives Keeping only (cid:27)rst-order terms, we obtain 1 = 1 − δdt + r h(t)dt − (cid:219)y(t) y(t)dt + u (cid:48)(0)y(t)dt . 42 Reshuf(cid:28)ing the terms and dividing by dt, we conclude that (cid:219)y(t) y(t) = r h(t) − δ + u (cid:48)(0)y(t). We obtain the Euler equation (4) from here by noting that r h(t) = r(t) + σ and introducing the natural rate of interest r n given by (A12). B.2. Phillips curve The Phillips curve says that households price in an optimal fashion: they cannot improve their situation by shi(cid:29)ing in(cid:28)ation a little bit across time. Consider a household delaying one percentage point of in(cid:28)ation from time t to time t + dt. Given the quadratic price-change disutility, the marginal disutility from in(cid:28)ation at any time t is e−δtγ π(t). Hence, at time t, the household avoids a disutility of −δtγ π(t) × 1%. e And, at time t + dt, the household incurs an extra disutility of γ π(t + dt) × 1%. −δ(t +dt) e Delaying in(cid:28)ation by one percentage point reduces the household's price between times t and t + dt by dp(t) = −1% × p(t). The price drop then affects sales. Since the price elasticity of demand is −, sales increase by dy(t) = −y(t) × −1% = y(t) × 1%. Accordingly, the household's revenue grows by d(p(t)y(t)) = p(t)dy(t) + y(t)dp(t) = ( − 1)y(t)p(t) × 1%. With a higher revenue, the household can afford to consume more. Since in equilibrium all prices are the same, equal to p(t), the increase in revenue raises consumption by dc(t) = d(p(t)y(t)) p(t) = ( − 1)y(t) × 1%. 43 Hence, between times t and t + dt, the utility of consumption increases by e−δt y(t)dc(t) = e −δt( − 1) × 1%. At the same time, because production is higher, the household must work more. Hours worked are extended by dh(t) = dy(t) a y(t) a = × 1%. As a result, between times t and t + dt, the disutility of labor is elevated by −δtκdh(t) = e e −δt κy(t) a × 1%. At the optimum, shi(cid:29)ing in(cid:28)ation across time does not affect utility, so the following holds: 0 = e −δtγ π(t) × 1% − e −δ(t +dt) γ π(t + dt) × 1% + e −δt( − 1) × 1% × dt − e −δtκ y(t) a × 1% × dt . Divided by e−δt × 1%, this condition yields 0 = γ π(t) − e −δdtγ π(t + dt) + ( − 1) × dt − κ y(t) a × dt . Furthermore, up to second-order terms, the following approximations hold: −δdt = 1 − δdt e π(t + dt) = π(t) + (cid:219)π(t)dt . Therefore, up to second-order terms, the previous condition gives y(t) a 0 = γ π(t) − (1 − δdt)γ [π(t) + (cid:219)π(t)dt] − κ dt + ( − 1)dt Then, keeping only (cid:27)rst-order terms, we obtain 0 = δγ π(t)dt − γ (cid:219)π(t)dt − κ y(t) a dt + ( − 1)dt . (cid:20) Rearranging the terms and dividing by γdt, we conclude that y(t) − − 1 (cid:219)π(t) = δπ(t) − κ γ a (cid:21) . · a κ 44 Once we introduce the natural level of output yn given by (A11), we obtain the Phillips curve (1). The Phillips curve implies that without price-adjustment cost (γ = 0), households would produce at the natural level of output. This result comes from the monopolistic nature of com- petition. Without price-adjustment cost, it is optimal to charge a relative price that is a markup /( − 1) over the real marginal cost. In turn, the real marginal cost is the marginal rate of substi- tution between labor and consumption divided by the marginal product of labor. In equilibrium, all relative prices are 1, the marginal rate of substitution between labor and consumption is κ/(1/y) = κy, and the marginal product of labor is a. Hence, optimal pricing requires − 1 · κy Combined with (A11), this condition implies y = yn. 1 = a . The derivation also elucidates why in steady state, in(cid:28)ation is positive whenever output is above its natural level. When in(cid:28)ation is positive, a household can reduce its price-adjustment cost by lowering its in(cid:28)ation. Since pricing is optimal, however, there cannot exist any pro(cid:27)table deviation from the equilibrium. This means that the household must also incur a cost when it lowers in(cid:28)ation. A consequence of lowering in(cid:28)ation is that the price charged by the household drops, which stimulates its sales and production. The absence of pro(cid:27)table deviation imposes that the household incurs a cost when production increases. In other words, production must be excessive: output must be above its natural level. Appendix C. Euler equation & Phillips curve in discrete time We recast the model of section 3 in discrete time, and we rederive the Euler equation and Phillips curve. This reformulation might be helpful to compare our model to the textbook New Keynesian model, which is presented in discrete time (Woodford 2003; Gali 2008). The reformulation also shows that introducing wealth in the utility function yields a discounted Euler equation. C.1. Assumptions The assumptions are the same in the discrete-time model as in the continuous-time model, except for government bonds. In discrete time, households trade one-period government bonds. Bonds purchased in period t have a price q(t) and pay one unit of money in period t + 1. The nominal interest rate on government bonds is de(cid:27)ned as ih(t) = − ln(q(t)). 45 C.2. Household's problem Household j chooses sequences(cid:110) ∞ sum of instantaneous utilities (cid:18)Þ 1 (cid:40) k=0 , bj(t)(cid:111)∞ yj(t), pj(t), hj(t),(cid:2)cjk(t)(cid:3) 1 (cid:19) (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) (cid:19) t =0 cjk(t)(−1)/ dk + u − κhj(t) − γ 2 βt t =0 − 1 ln 0 p(t) to maximize the discounted (cid:21) 2(cid:41) (cid:20) pj(t) pj(t − 1) − 1 dt, where β < 1 is the time discount factor. The maximization is subject to three constraints. First, there is a production function: yj(t) = ahj(t). Second, there is the demand for good j: (cid:21)− (cid:20)pj(t) p(t) yj(t) = c(t) ≡ yd j (pj(t), t). The demand for good j is the same as in continuous time because the allocation of consumption expenditure across goods is a static decision, so it is unaffected by the representation of time. And third, there is a budget constraint: Þ 1 0 pk(t)cjk(t) dk + q(t)bj(t) + τ(t) = pj(t)yj(t) + bj(t − 1). Household j is also subject to a solvency constraint preventing Ponzi schemes. Lastly, household j takes as given the initial conditions bj(−1) and pj(−1), as well as the sequences of aggregate variables {p(t), q(t), c(t)}∞ t =0. The Lagrangian of the household's problem is ∞ Lj = βt t =0 + Aj(t) (cid:18)Þ 1 0 (cid:26) (cid:20) − 1 pj(t)yd ln cjk(t)(−1)/ dk j (pj(t), t) + bj(t − 1) − (cid:19) + u Þ 1 0 (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) (cid:19) p(t) − κ a j (pj(t), t) − γ yd 2 pk(t)cjk(t) dk − q(t)bj(t) − τ(t) (cid:21)(cid:27) (cid:21) 2 (cid:20) pj(t) pj(t − 1) − 1 where Aj(t) is a Lagrange multiplier. We have used the production and demand constraints to substitute hj(t) and yj(t) out of the Lagrangian. The necessary conditions for a maximum to the household's problem are standard (cid:27)rst-order conditions. The (cid:27)rst optimality conditions are ∂Lj/∂cjk(t) = 0 for all k ∈ [0, 1] and all t. As in continuous time, these conditions yield Aj(t) = 1 p(t)cj(t) . 46 (A13) The second optimality condition is ∂Lj/∂bj(t) = 0 for all t, which gives q(t)Aj(t) = + βAj(t + 1). Using (A13), we obtain the household's Euler equation: q(t) = cj(t)u p(t)cj(t) p(t + 1)cj(t + 1) . The third optimality condition is ∂Lj/∂pj(t) = 0 for all t, which yields pj(t + 1) pj(t)2 + (1 − )Aj(t)yj(t) + βγ (cid:20) pj(t) pj(t − 1) − 1 pj(t − 1) 0 = κ a (A14) (cid:21) (cid:20)pj(t + 1) pj(t) − 1 . (cid:19) + β p(t) p(t) 1 p(t)u (cid:48)(cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) (cid:19) (cid:48)(cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) (cid:21) (cid:20)pj(t + 1) pj(t) − 1 (cid:21) γ · yj(t) pj(t) − (cid:20) pj(t) pj(t − 1) − 1 (cid:21) pj(t) pj(t − 1) Multiplying this equation by pj(t)/γ and using (A13), we obtain the household's Phillips curve: pj(t + 1) pj(t) = β yj(t) − − 1 γ · pj(t)yj(t) p(t)cj(t) . + κ γ a (A15) C.3. Equilibrium We now describe the equilibrium. Since all households face the same initial conditions, they all behave the same, so we drop the subscripts j and k on all the variables. In particular, all households hold the same wealth, so relative wealth is zero: bj(t) = b(t). In addition, production and consumption are equal in equilibrium: y(t) = c(t). Accordingly, from (A14) we obtain the Euler equation p(t + 1)y(t + 1) . Moreover, combining (A15) and (A11), we obtain the Phillips curve q(t) = u (cid:48)(0)y(t) + β p(t)y(t) (cid:21) (cid:20) p(t) p(t − 1) − 1 p(t) p(t − 1) (cid:21) (cid:20)p(t + 1) p(t) − 1 + − 1 γ p(t + 1) p(t) = β (A16) (A17) (cid:20)y(t) yn (cid:21) . − 1 C.4. Log-linearization To obtain the standard expressions of the Euler equation and Phillips curve, we log-linearize (A16) and (A17) around the natural steady state: where y = yn, π = 0, and i = r n. To that end, we introduce the log-deviation of output from its steady-state level: y(t) = ln(y(t)) − ln(yn). We also introduce the in(cid:28)ation rate between periods t and t + 1: π(t + 1) = ln(p(t + 1)) − ln(p(t)). 47 Euler equation. We start by log-linearizing the Euler equation (A16). We (cid:27)rst take the log of the le(cid:29)-hand side of (A16). Using the discrete-time de(cid:27)nition of the nominal interest rate faced by households, ih(t), we obtain ln(q(t)) = −ih(t). At the natural steady state, the monetary-policy rate is i = r n, so the interest rate faced by households is ih = r n + σ , and ln(q(t)) = −r n − σ . Next we take the log of the right-hand side of (A16). We obtain Λ ≡ ln(Λ1 + Λ2), where Λ1 ≡ u (cid:48)(0)y(t), Λ2 ≡ β p(t)y(t) p(t + 1)y(t + 1) . For future reference, we compute the values of Λ, Λ1, and Λ2 at the natural steady state. At the natural steady state, the log of the le(cid:29)-hand side of (A16) equals −r n − σ , which implies that the log of the right-hand side of (A16) must also equal −r n − σ . That is, at the natural steady state, Λ = −r n − σ . Moreover, at that steady state, Λ1 = u(cid:48)(0)yn. And, since in(cid:28)ation is zero and output is constant at that steady state, Λ2 = β. Using these results, we obtain a (cid:27)rst-order approximation of Λ(Λ1, Λ2) around the natural steady state: Λ = −r n − σ + [Λ1 − u (cid:48)(0)yn] + [Λ2 − β] . ∂Λ ∂Λ2 Factoring out u(cid:48)(0)yn and β, and using the de(cid:27)nitions of Λ1 and Λ2, we obtain ∂Λ ∂Λ1 (cid:20)y(t) (cid:21) (cid:20) − 1 + β · ∂Λ ∂Λ2 · p(t)y(t) p(t + 1)y(t + 1) − 1 (cid:21) . (A18) Λ = −r n − σ + u (cid:48)(0)yn · ∂Λ ∂Λ1 · yn Since Λ = ln(Λ1 + Λ2), we obviously have ∂Λ ∂Λ1 = ∂Λ ∂Λ2 = 1 Λ1 + Λ2 . In (A18), the derivatives are evaluated at the natural state, so Hence, (A18) becomes Λ = −r n − σ + u(cid:48)(0)yn u(cid:48)(0)yn + β ∂Λ ∂Λ1 = ∂Λ ∂Λ2 (cid:20)y(t) yn − 1 = 1 u(cid:48)(0)yn + β + β u(cid:48)(0)yn + β . (cid:20) (cid:21) . p(t)y(t) p(t + 1)y(t + 1) − 1 (A19) (cid:21) Last, up to second-order terms, we have ln(x) = x − 1 around x = 1. Thus, we have the 48 following (cid:27)rst-order approximations around the natural steady state: − 1 = ln = y(t) (A20) (cid:18)y(t) (cid:19) yn y(t) yn (cid:18) (cid:18)y(t) (cid:19) p(t)y(t) p(t + 1)y(t + 1) (cid:19) (cid:18)y(t + 1) (cid:19) and p(t)y(t) p(t + 1)y(t + 1) − 1 = ln (cid:19) (cid:18)p(t + 1) p(t) − ln = ln = y(t) − y(t + 1) − π(t + 1). yn yn − ln We can therefore rewrite (A19) as u(cid:48)(0)yn u(cid:48)(0)yn + β Λ = −r n − σ + Finally, introducing y(t) + β u(cid:48)(0)yn + β [ y(t) − y(t + 1) − π(t + 1)] . α = β β + u(cid:48)(0)yn , we obtain Λ = −r n − σ + (1 − α) y(t) + α [ y(t) − y(t + 1) − π(t + 1)] . In conclusion, taking the log of the Euler equation (A16) yields −ih(t) = −r n − σ + (1 − α) y(t) + α [ y(t) − y(t + 1) − π(t + 1)] Reshuf(cid:28)ing the terms and noting that ih(t) = i(t) + σ , we obtain the log-linearized Euler equation: y(t) = α y(t + 1) − [i(t) − r n − απ(t + 1)] . (A21) Discounting. Because u(cid:48)(0) > 0, we have α = β β + u(cid:48)(0)yn < 1. Thus, because the marginal utility of wealth is positive, the Euler equation is discounted: future output, y(t + 1), appears discounted by the coef(cid:27)cient α < 1 in (A21). Such discounting also appears in the presence of overlapping generations (Del Negro, Giannoni, and Patterson 2015; Eggertsson, Mehrotra, and Robbins 2019); heterogeneous agents facing borrowing constraints 49 and cyclical income risk (McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson 2017; Acharya and Dogra 2019; Bilbiie 2019); consumers' bounded rationality (Gabaix 2016); incomplete information (Angeletos and Lian 2018); bonds in the utility function (Campbell et al. 2017); and borrowing costs increasing in household debt (Beaudry and Portier 2018). To make discounting more apparent, we solve the Euler equation forward: y(t) = − +∞ αk [i(t + k) − r n − απ(t + k + 1)] . k=0 The effect on current output of interest rates k periods in the future is discounted by αk < 1; hence, discounting is stronger for interest rates further in the future (McKay, Nakamura, and Steinsson 2017, p. 821). Phillips curve. Next we log-linearize the Phillips curve (A17). We start with the le(cid:29)-hand side of (A17). The (cid:27)rst-order approximations of x(x − 1) and ln(x) around x = 1 both are x − 1. This means that up to second-order terms, we have x(x − 1) = ln(x) around x = 1. Hence, up to second-order terms, the following approximation holds around the natural steady state: We turn to the right-hand side of (A17) and proceed similarly. We (cid:27)nd that up to second-order terms, the following approximation holds around the natural steady state: Furthermore, (A20) implies that up to second-order terms, the ensuing approximation holds around the natural steady state: = ln = π(t). (cid:19) (cid:18) p(t) p(t − 1) (cid:18)p(t + 1) (cid:19) p(t) = β ln = βπ(t + 1). p(t) p(t − 1) p(t + 1) p(t) β (cid:21) (cid:20) p(t) p(t − 1) − 1 (cid:21) (cid:20)p(t + 1) p(t) − 1 (cid:20)y(t) − 1 γ yn (cid:21) − 1 = − 1 γ y(t). Combining all these results, we obtain the log-linearized Phillips curve: π(t) = βπ(t + 1) + − 1 γ y(t). (A22) 50 Appendix D. Proofs We provide alternative proofs of propositions 1 and 2. These proofs are not graphical but algebraic; they are closer to the proofs found in the literature. We also complement the proof of proposition 4. D.1. Alternative proof of proposition 1 We study the properties of the dynamical system generated by the Phillips curve (1) and Euler equation (4) in normal times. The natural rate of interest is positive and monetary policy imposes r(π) = r n + (ϕ − 1)π . Steady state. A steady state [y, π] must satisfy the steady-state Phillips curve (3) and steady-state Euler equation (7). These equations form a linear system: π = κ δγ a (ϕ − 1)π = −u (y − yn) (cid:48)(0)(y − yn). As [y = yn, π = 0] satis(cid:27)es both equations, it is a steady state. Furthermore the steady state is unique because the two equations are non-parallel. In the NK model, this is obvious since u(cid:48)(0) = 0. In the WUNK model, the slope of the second equation is −u(cid:48)(0)/(ϕ − 1). If ϕ > 1, the slope is negative. If ϕ ∈ [0, 1), the slope is positive and strictly greater than u(cid:48)(0) and thus than κ/(δγ a) (because (9) holds). In both cases, the two equations have different slopes. Linearization. The Euler-Phillips system is nonlinear, so we determine its properties by lin- earizing it around its steady state. We (cid:27)rst write the Euler equation and Phillips curve as (cid:219)y(t) = E(y(t), π(t)), where E(y, π) = y[(ϕ − 1)π + u (cid:219)π(t) = P(y(t), π(t)), where P(y, π) = δπ − κ γ a (y − yn). (cid:48)(0)(y − yn)] Around the natural steady state, the linearized Euler-Phillips system is ∂E ∂π ∂P ∂π 51 (cid:35) (cid:34) (cid:219)y(t) (cid:219)π(t) =  ∂E ∂y ∂P ∂y (cid:35) , y(t) − yn π (cid:34)  where the derivatives are evaluated at [y = yn, π = 0]. We have = yn(ϕ − 1) ∂E ∂π (cid:48)(0), ∂E ∂y ∂P ∂y = ynu = −κ γ a , ∂P ∂π = δ . Accordingly the linearized Euler-Phillips system is (cid:35) (cid:34) (cid:219)y(t) (cid:219)π(t) (cid:34) = u(cid:48)(0)yn −κ/(γ a) (ϕ − 1)yn δ (cid:35)(cid:34) (cid:35) . y(t) − yn π(t) (A23) We denote by M the matrix in (A23), and by µ1 ∈ (cid:67) and µ2 ∈ (cid:67) the two eigenvalues of M, assumed to be distinct. Solution with two real eigenvalues. We begin by solving (A23) when µ1 and µ2 are real and nonzero. Without loss of generality, we assume µ1 < µ2. Then the solution takes the form (cid:35) (cid:34) y(t) − yn π(t) = x1e µ1t(cid:118)1 + x2e µ2t(cid:118)2, (A24) 2 and (cid:118)2 ∈ (cid:82) where (cid:118)1 ∈ (cid:82) 2 are the linearly independent eigenvectors respectively associated with the eigenvalues µ1 and µ2, and x1 ∈ (cid:82) and x2 ∈ (cid:82) are constants determined by the terminal condition (Hirsch, Smale, and Devaney 2013, p. 35). From (A24), we see that the Euler-Phillips system is a source when µ1 > 0 and µ2 > 0. Moreover, the solutions are tangent to (cid:118)1 when t → −∞ and are parallel to (cid:118)2 when t → +∞. The system is a saddle when µ1 < 0 and µ2 > 0; in that case, the vector (cid:118)1 gives the direction of the stable line (saddle path) while the vector (cid:118)2 gives the direction of the unstable line. Lastly, when µ1 < 0 and µ2 < 0, the system is a sink. (See Hirsch, Smale, and Devaney 2013, pp. 40 -- 44.) Solution with two complex eigenvalues. Next we solve (A23) when µ1 and µ2 are complex con- jugates. We write the eigenvalues as µ1 = θ + iς and µ2 = θ − iς. We also write the eigenvector associated with µ1 as (cid:118)1 + i(cid:118)2, where the vectors (cid:118)1 ∈ (cid:82) 2 are linearly independent. Then the solution takes a more complicated form: 2 and (cid:118)2 ∈ (cid:82) (cid:34) (cid:35) y(t) − yn π(t) = eθt [(cid:118)1, (cid:118)2] (cid:34) cos(ςt) sin(ςt) − sin(ςt) cos(ςt) (cid:35)(cid:34) (cid:35) , x1 x2 52 where [(cid:118)1, (cid:118)2] ∈ (cid:82) terminal condition (Hirsch, Smale, and Devaney 2013, pp. 44 -- 55). 2×2 is a 2 × 2 matrix, and x1 ∈ (cid:82) and x2 ∈ (cid:82) are constants determined by the These solutions wind periodically around the steady state, either moving toward it (θ < 0) or away from it (θ > 0). Hence, the Euler-Phillips system is a spiral source if θ > 0 and a spiral sink if θ < 0. In the special case θ = 0, the solutions circle around the steady state: the Euler-Phillips system is a center. (See Hirsch, Smale, and Devaney 2013, pp. 44 -- 47.) Classi(cid:27)cation. We classify the Euler-Phillips system from the trace and determinant of M (Hirsch, Smale, and Devaney 2013, pp. 61 -- 64). The classi(cid:27)cation relies on the property that tr(M) = µ1 + µ2 and det(M) = µ1µ2. The following situations may occur in the NK and WUNK models: • det(M) < 0: Then the Euler-Phillips system is a saddle. This is because det(M) < 0 indicates that µ1 and µ2 are real, nonzero, and of opposite sign. Indeed, if µ1 and µ2 were real and of the same sign, det(M) = µ1µ2 > 0; and if they were complex conjugates, det(M) = µ1µ1 = Re(µ1)2 + Im(µ1)2 • det(M) > 0 and tr(M) > 0: Then the Euler-Phillips system is a source. This is because det(M) > 0 indicates that µ1 and µ2 are either real, nonzero, and of the same sign; or complex conjugates. Since in addition tr(M) > 0, µ1 and µ2 must be either real and positive, or complex with a positive real part. Indeed, if µ1 and µ2 were real and negative, tr(M) = µ1 + µ2 < 0; if they were complex with a negative real part, tr(M) = µ1 + µ1 = 2 Re(µ1) < 0. Using (A23), we compute the trace and determinant of M: > 0. tr(M) = δ + u det(M) = δu (cid:48)(0)yn (cid:48)(0)yn + (ϕ − 1)κ γ a yn. In the NK model, u(cid:48)(0) = 0, so tr(M) = δ > 0 and det(M) = (ϕ − 1)ynκ γ a . If ϕ > 1, tr(M) > 0 and det(M) > 0, so the system is a source. If ϕ < 1, det(M) < 0, so the system is a saddle. In the WUNK model, tr(M) > δ > 0. Further, using ϕ − 1 ≥ −1 and (9), we have det(M) ≥ δu (cid:48)(0)yn − κ γ a yn = δyn 53 (cid:20) (cid:21) u (cid:48)(0) − κ δγ a > 0. Since tr(M) > 0 and det(M) > 0, the system is a source. D.2. Alternative proof of proposition 2 We study the properties of the dynamical system generated by the Phillips curve (1) and Euler equation (4) at the ZLB. The natural rate of interest is negative and monetary policy imposes r(π) = −π . Steady state. A steady state [y, π] must satisfy the steady-state Phillips curve (3) and the steady- state Euler equation (7). These equations form a linear system: (y − yn) π = κ δγ a π = −r n + u (cid:48)(0)(y − yn). (A25) (A26) A solution to this system with positive output is a steady state. In the NK model, u(cid:48)(0) = 0, so the system admits a unique solution: π z = −r n yz = yn − δγ a κ r n. Since r n < 0, the solution satis(cid:27)es yz > yn > 0: the solution has positive output so it is a steady state. Hence the NK model admits a unique steady state at the ZLB: [yz, π z], where π z > 0 (since r n < 0) and yz > yn. In the WUNK model, since (9) holds, the equations (A25) and (A26) are non-parallel, so the system admits a unique solution, denoted [yz, π z]. Using (A25) to substitute y − yn out of (A26), we (cid:27)nd that r n π z = u(cid:48)(0)δγ a/(κ) − 1 . (A27) Condition (9) implies that the denominator is positive. Since r n < 0, we conclude that π z < 0. Next, combining (A25) and (A27), we obtain yz = yn + r n u(cid:48)(0) − κ/(δγ a) . (A28) Since (9) holds, the denominator of the fraction is positive. As r n < 0, we conclude that yz < yn. Finally, to establish that [yz, π z] is a steady state, we need to verify that yz > 0. According to 54 (A28), we need Equations (5) and (9) indicate that yn > −r n u(cid:48)(0) − κ/(δγ a) . The above inequality is therefore equivalent to −r n = u (cid:48)(0)yn − δ and u (cid:48)(0) − κ δγ a > 0. (cid:20) (cid:21) u (cid:48)(0) − κ δγ a yn > u (cid:48)(0)yn − δ . Eliminating u(cid:48)(0)yn on both sides, we (cid:27)nd that this is equivalent to −κyn δγ a > −δ, or δ 2 > κyn γ a . Equation (A11) implies that κyn γ a = − 1 . γ − 1 γ So we need to verify that But we have imposed δ >(cid:112)( − 1)/γ in the WUNK model, to accommodate a positive natural rate of interest. We can therefore conclude that yz > 0, and that [yz, π z] is a steady state. > 2 δ . Linearization. The Euler-Phillips system is nonlinear, so we determine its properties by lin- earizing it. Around the ZLB steady state, the linearized Euler-Phillips system is (cid:35) (cid:34) (cid:219)y(t) (cid:219)π(t) (cid:34) = (cid:35)(cid:34) (cid:35) u(cid:48)(0)yz −κ/(γ a) −yz δ y(t) − yz π(t) − π z . (A29) To obtain the matrix, denoted M, we set ϕ = 0 and replace yn by yz in the matrix from (A23). Classi(cid:27)cation. We classify the Euler-Phillips system (A29) by computing the trace and determi- nant of M, as in appendix D.1. We have tr(M) = δ + u(cid:48)(0)yz > 0 and (cid:21) det(M) = δyz (cid:48)(0) − κ δγ a . (cid:20) u 55 In the NK model, u(cid:48)(0) = 0 so det(M) < 0, which implies that the Euler-Phillips system is a saddle. In the WUNK model, (9) implies that det(M) > 0. Since in addition tr(M) > 0, the Euler-Phillips system is a source. In fact, in the WUNK model, the discriminant of the characteristic equation of M is strictly positive: tr(M)2 − 4 det(M) = δ (cid:48)(0)yn − 4δu (cid:48)(0)yn + 4κ γ a yn 2 + [u = [δ − u (cid:48)(0)yn]2 + 2δu (cid:48)(0)yn]2 + 4κ γ a yn > 0. Hence the eigenvalues of M are real, not complex: the Euler-Phillips system is a nodal source, not a spiral source. D.3. Complement to the proof of proposition 4 We characterize the forward-guidance duration ∆∗ for the NK model, and the ZLB duration T ∗ for the WUNK model. In the NK model, ∆∗ is the duration of forward guidance that brings the economy on the unstable line of the ZLB phase diagram at timeT ((cid:27)gure 3, panel C). With longer forward guidance (∆ > ∆∗), the economy is above the unstable line at time T , and so it is connected to trajectories that come from the northeast quadrant of the ZLB phase diagram ((cid:27)gure 3, panel D). As a conse- quence, during ZLB and forward guidance, in(cid:28)ation is positive and output is above its natural level. Moreover, since the position of the economy at the end of the ZLB is unaffected by the duration of the ZLB, initial output and in(cid:28)ation become arbitrarily high as the ZLB duration of the ZLB approaches in(cid:27)nity. In the WUNK model, for any forward-guidance duration, the economy at time T is bound to be in the right-hand triangle of (cid:27)gure 4, panel D. All the points in that triangle are connected to trajectories that (cid:28)ow from the ZLB steady state, through the le(cid:29)-hand triangle of (cid:27)gure 4, panel D. For any of these trajectories, initial in(cid:28)ation π(0) converges from above to the ZLB steady state's in(cid:28)ation π z as the ZLB duration T goes to in(cid:27)nity. Since π z < 0, we infer that for each trajectory, there is a ZLB duration T , such that for any T > T , π(0) < 0. Furthermore, as showed in panel D of (cid:27)gure 4, y(0) < yn whenever π(0) < 0. The ZLB duration T ∗ is constructed as T ∗ = max(cid:8) T(cid:9). the set(cid:8) T(cid:9) is a closed and bounded subset of (cid:82), which admits a maximum. We know that the set (cid:8) T(cid:9) is closed and bounded because the function that maps a position at time T to a threshold T The maximum exists because the right-hand triangle is a closed and bounded subset of (cid:82) 2, so is continuous. 56 Appendix E. Model with government spending We introduce government spending into the model of section 3. We compute the model's Euler equation and Phillips curve, linearize them, and use the linearized equations to construct the model's phase diagrams. E.1. Assumptions We start from the model of section 3, and we assume that the government purchases a quantity ❕j(t) of each good j ∈ [0, 1]. These quantities are aggregated into an index of public consumption (cid:20)Þ 1 0 (cid:21)/(−1) ❕(t) ≡ ❕j(t)(−1)/ dj . (A30) Public consumption ❕(t) enters separately into households' utility functions. Government expen- diture is (cid:27)nanced with lump-sum taxation. Additionally, we assume that the disutility of labor is not linear but convex. Household j incurs disutility 1+η κ 1 + η hj(t)1+η from working, where η > 0 is the inverse of the Frisch elasticity. The utility function is altered to ensure that government spending affects in(cid:28)ation and private consumption. E.2. Euler equation & Phillips curve We derive the Euler equation and Phillips curve just as in appendix A. The only new step is to compute the government's spending on each good. At any time t, the government chooses the amount ❕j(t) of each good j ∈ [0, 1] to minimize the expenditure subject to the constraint of providing an amount of public consumption ❕: pj(t)❕j(t) dj (cid:21)/(−1) = ❕(t). Þ 1 0 (cid:20)Þ 1 0 ❕j(t)(−1)/ dj 57 (cid:21)−1/ (cid:20)❕j(t) ❕(t) . pj(t) = C · ❕j(t) = ❕(t). C = p(t). p(t) (cid:21)− (cid:20)pj(t) (cid:18)bj(t) − b(t) Þ 1 p(t) (cid:19) (cid:19) + u (A31) (A32) (A33) To solve the government's problem at time t, we set up a Lagrangian: L = pj(t)❕j(t) dj + C · ❕ − ❕j(t)(−1)/ dj (cid:40) (cid:20)Þ 1 0 (cid:21)/(−1)(cid:41) , Þ 1 0 where C is a Lagrange multiplier. We then follow the same steps as in the derivation of (A6). The (cid:27)rst-order conditions with respect to ❕j(t) for all j ∈ [0, 1] are ∂L/∂❕j = 0. These conditions imply Appropriately integrating (A31) over all j ∈ [0, 1], and using (A3) and (A30), we (cid:27)nd Lastly, combining (A31) and (A32), we obtain the government's demand for good j: Next we solve household j's problem. We set up the current-value Hamiltonian: (cid:18)Þ 1 (cid:20) Hj = − 1 + Aj(t) ln 0 cjk(t)(−1)/ dk ih(t)bj(t) + pj(t)yd j (pj(t), t) − 0 (cid:104)κ j (pj(t), t)(cid:105) 1+η − γ (cid:21) + Bj(t)πj(t)pj(t). 2 πj(t)2 − 1 1 + η yd pk(t)cjk(t) dk − τ(t) a The terms featuring the consumption levels cjk(t) in the Hamiltonian are the same as in appendix A.1, so the optimality conditions ∂Hj/∂cjk = 0 remain the same. This implies that (A1), (A4), and (A5) remain valid. Adding the government's demand, given by (A33), to households' demand, given by (A5), we obtain the total demand for good j at time t: Þ 1 0 (cid:21)− (cid:20)pj(t) p(t) j (pj(t), t) = ❕j(t) + yd cjk(t) dk = y(t), 0 cj(t) dj measures total consumption. The expression for yd j (pj(t), t) enters the Hamiltonian Hj. The terms featuring the bond holdingsbj(t) in the Hamiltonian are the same as in appendix A.1. Therefore, the optimality condition ∂Hj/∂bj = δAj − (cid:219)Aj remains the same, and the Euler where y(t) ≡ ❕(t) +Þ 1 58 equation (A7) remains valid. In equilibrium, the Euler equation simpli(cid:27)es to (cid:219)c c = r − δ + σ + u (cid:48)(0)c. (A34) Thus, the optimality condition ∂Hj/∂πj = 0 is unchanged, and (A8) and (A9) hold. The terms featuring in(cid:28)ation πj(t) in the Hamiltonian are also the same as in appendix A.1. Last, because the disutility from labor is convex, the optimality condition ∂Hj/∂pj = δBj − (cid:219)Bj is modi(cid:27)ed. The condition now gives (cid:17)1+η (cid:16)κ a yj pj which can be rewritten + (1 − )Ajyj + Bjπj = δBj − (cid:219)Bj, Combining this equation with (A4), (A8), and (A9), we obtain the household's Phillips curve: (cid:34) pj − − 1 (cid:16)κ a πj − ( − 1)yjAj Bjpj (cid:219)πj πj = δ + ( − 1)yj γcjπj − − 1 (cid:219)BjBj . (cid:35) jAj = δ − (cid:17)1+η yη (cid:21) (cid:17)1+η (cid:16)κ (cid:17)1+η (c + ❕)ηc (cid:16)κ yη j cj a . (cid:21) , (A35) (A36) In equilibrium, the Phillips curve simpli(cid:27)es to ( − 1)(c + ❕) (cid:219)π = δπ + 1 − − 1 a γc where c + ❕ = y is aggregate output. E.3. Linearized Euler-Phillips system We now linearize the Euler-Phillips system around the natural steady state, which has zero in(cid:28)ation and no government spending. The analysis of the model with government spending is based on this linearized system. Since (cid:219)π = π = ❕ = 0 at the natural steady state, (A36) implies that the natural level of consumption is cn = (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)1/(1+η) a κ . (cid:20)pj (cid:20) p 59 Since (cid:219)c = 0 and c = cn at the natural steady state, (A34) implies that the natural rate of interest is r n = δ − σ − u (cid:48)(0)cn. Euler equation. We (cid:27)rst linearize the Euler equation (A34) around the point [c = cn, π = 0]. We consider two different monetary-policy rules. First, when monetary policy is normal, r(π) = r n + (ϕ − 1) π . Then the Euler equation is (cid:219)c = E(c, π), where E(c, π) = c [(ϕ − 1)π + u (cid:48)(0)(c − cn)] . The linearized version is ∂E π , ∂π where the derivatives are evaluated at [c = cn, π = 0]. We have (cid:219)c = E(cn, 0) + (c − cn) + ∂E ∂c E(cn, 0) = 0, = cnu (cid:48)(0), ∂E ∂c = cn(ϕ − 1). ∂E ∂π So the linearized Euler equation with normal monetary policy is (cid:219)c = cn [(ϕ − 1)π + u (cid:48)(0)(c − cn)] . (A37) Second, when monetary policy is at the ZLB, r(π) = −π . Then the Euler equation can be written (cid:219)c = E(c, π) where E(c, π) = c [−r n − π + u (cid:48)(0)(c − cn)] . The linearized version is ∂E π , ∂π where the derivatives are evaluated at [c = cn, π = 0]. We have (cid:219)c = E(cn, 0) + (c − cn) + ∂E ∂c E(cn, 0) = −cnr n, = cnu (cid:48)(0), ∂E ∂c = −cn. ∂E ∂π So the linearized Euler equation at the ZLB is (cid:219)c = cn [−r n − π + u (cid:48)(0)(c − cn)] . (A38) 60 In steady state, at the ZLB, the linearized Euler equation becomes π = −r n + u (cid:48)(0)(c − cn). (A39) Phillips curve. Next we linearize the Phillips curve (A36) around the point [c = cn, π = 0, ❕ = 0]. The Phillips curve can be written (cid:219)π = P(c, π , ❕) where (cid:20) (cid:17)1+η (c + ❕)ηc (cid:21) . (cid:16)κ a P(c, π , ❕) = δπ + ( − 1)(c + ❕) γc The linearized version is 1 − − 1 ∂P ∂❕ where the derivatives are evaluated at [c = cn, π = 0, ❕ = 0]. We have (cid:219)π = P(cn, 0, 0) + (c − cn) + ∂P ∂π ∂P ∂c π + ❕, (cid:19)η/(1+η) P(cn, 0, 0) = 0 = − γ ∂P ∂c ∂P ∂π ∂P ∂❕ = δ = − γ (cid:16)κ (cid:16)κ a a (cid:219)π = δπ − κ γ a γ a κ γ a η (cn)η = −η (cid:18) − 1 (cid:17)1+η (1 + η)(cn)η = −(1 + η)κ (cid:19)η/(1+η) (cid:18) − 1 (cid:17)1+η (cid:19)η/(1+η) (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) (cid:18) − 1 [(1 + η)(c − cn) + η❕] . [(1 + η)(c − cn) + η❕] . . In steady state, the linearized Phillips curve becomes π = − κ δγ a E.4. Phase diagrams Hence, the linearized Phillips curve is (A40) (A41) Using the linearized Euler-Phillips system, we construct the phase diagrams of the NK and WUNK models with government spending. 61 A. NK model: normal times, active monetary policy B. WUNK model: normal times, active monetary policy C. NK model: ZLB D. WUNK model: ZLB Figure A1. Phase diagrams of the linearized Euler-Phillips system in the NK and WUNK models with government spending The (cid:27)gure displays phase diagrams for the linearized Euler-Phillips system in the model with government spending: c is private consumption; π is in(cid:28)ation; cn is the natural level of consumption; the Euler line is the locus (cid:219)c = 0; the Phillips line is the locus (cid:219)π = 0; the trajectories are solutions to the system, plotted for t going from −∞ to +∞. The four panels contrast various cases. The NK model is the standard New Keynesian model. The WUNK model is the same model, except that the marginal utility of wealth is not zero but is suf(cid:27)ciently large to satisfy (12). In normal times with active monetary policy, the natural rate of interest r n is positive, the monetary-policy rate is given by i = r n + ϕπ with ϕ > 1, and government spending is zero; the Euler-Phillips system is composed of (A37) with ϕ > 1 and (A40) with ❕ = 0. At the ZLB, the natural rate of interest is negative, the monetary-policy rate is zero, and government spending is positive; the Euler-Phillips system is composed of (A38) and (A40) with ❕ > 0. The (cid:27)gure shows that in the NK model, the Euler-Phillips system is a source in normal times with active monetary policy (panel A); but the system is a saddle at the ZLB (panel C). In the WUNK model, by contrast, the Euler-Phillips system is a source both in normal times and at the ZLB (panels B and D). (Panels A and B display a nodal source, but the system could also be a spiral source, depending on the value of ϕ; in panel D the system is always a nodal source.) 62 Normal times. We (cid:27)rst construct the phase diagrams for normal times with active monetary policy. The linearized Euler-Phillips system is composed of (A37) with ϕ > 1 and (A40) with ❕ = 0. We construct a phase diagram with private consumption c on the horizontal axis and in(cid:28)ation π on the vertical axis. We follow the methodology developed in section 3: we plot the loci (cid:219)π = 0 and (cid:219)c = 0, and then determine the sign of (cid:219)π and (cid:219)c in the four quadrants of the plan delimited by the two loci. The resulting phase diagrams are displayed in panels A and B of (cid:27)gure A1. They are similar to the phase diagrams in the basic model (panels A and B of (cid:27)gure 1).15 The phase diagrams show that in normal times, with active monetary policy, the Euler-Phillips system is a source in the NK and WUNK models. An algebraic approach con(cid:27)rms this result. The linearized Euler-Phillips system can be written (cid:34) (cid:35) (cid:34) (cid:219)c (cid:219)π u(cid:48)(0)cn (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) = −(1 + η) κ γ a (cid:35)(cid:34) (ϕ − 1)cn δ c − cn π (cid:35) . We denote the above matrix by M. We classify the Euler-Phillips system using the trace and determinant of M, as in appendix D.1: (cid:48)(0)cn (cid:48)(0) + (ϕ − 1)(1 + η) κ δγ a tr(M) = δ + u det(M) = δcn (cid:19)η/(1+η)(cid:35) (cid:18) − 1 (cid:34) u . In the NK model, u(cid:48)(0) = 0 so tr(M) = δ > 0 and the sign of det(M) is given by the sign of ϕ − 1. Accordingly when monetary policy is active (ϕ > 1), det(M) > 0: the Euler-Phillips system is a source. In contrast, when monetary policy is passive (ϕ < 1), det(M) < 0: the Euler-Phillips system is a saddle. In the WUNK model, tr(M) > δ > 0. Moreover, ϕ − 1 ≥ −1 for any ϕ ≥ 0, so we have (cid:34) (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η)(cid:35) . det(M) ≥ δcn u (cid:48)(0) − (1 + η) κ δγ a The WUNK assumption (12) says that the term in square brackets is positive, so det(M) > 0. We conclude that the Euler-Phillips system is a source whether monetary policy is active or passive. ZLB. We turn to the phase diagrams at the ZLB. The linearized Euler-Phillips system is composed of (A38) and (A40) with ❕ > 0. 15The phase diagrams of (cid:27)gure 1 have output y on the horizontal axis instead of private consumption c. But y = c in the basic model (government spending is zero), so phase diagrams with c on the horizontal axis would be identical. 63 Once again, we follow the methodology developed in section 3 to construct the phase diagrams. The resulting phase diagrams are displayed in panels C and D of (cid:27)gure A1. The diagrams have the same properties as in the basic model (panels C and D of (cid:27)gure 1), but for one difference: the Phillips line shi(cid:29)s upward because government spending is positive. Hence, the Phillips line lies above the point [c = cn, π = 0]. While this shi(cid:29) does not affect the classi(cid:27)cation of the Euler-Phillips system (source or saddle), it changes the location of the steady state. In fact, by solving the system given by (A39) and (A41), we (cid:27)nd that private consumption and in(cid:28)ation at the ZLB steady state are (cid:1)η/(1+η) (cid:0) −1 (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η) . η❕ r n + κ δγ a u(cid:48)(0) − (1 + η) κ (1 + η)r n + u(cid:48)(0)η❕ δγ a (cid:0) −1 c❕ = cn + π ❕ = u(cid:48)(0) δγ a κ (A42) (A43) Steady-state consumption may be above or below natural consumption, depending on the amount of government spending. In the WUNK model, in(cid:28)ation may be positive or negative, depending on the amount of government spending. The phase diagrams show that at the ZLB, the Euler-Phillips system is a source in the WUNK model but a saddle in the NK model. An algebraic approach con(cid:27)rms this classi(cid:27)cation. Rewritten in canonical form, the linearized Euler-Phillips system becomes (cid:34) (cid:35) (cid:34) (cid:219)c (cid:219)π u(cid:48)(0)cn (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) = −(1 + η) κ γ a (cid:35) . (cid:35)(cid:34) −cn δ c − c❕ π − π ❕ We denote the above matrix by M. We classify the Euler-Phillips system using the trace and determinant of M, as in appendix D.1: tr(M) = δ + u det(M) = δcn (cid:19)η/(1+η)(cid:35) (cid:18) − 1 (cid:48)(0)cn (cid:48)(0) − (1 + η) κ δγ a (cid:34) u . In the NK model, u(cid:48)(0) = 0 so det(M) < 0, indicating that the Euler-Phillips system is a saddle. In the WUNK model, condition (12) implies that det(M) > 0; since we also have tr(M) > 0, we conclude that the Euler-Phillips system is a source. We can also show that tr(M)2 − 4 det(M) > 0, which indicates that the system is a nodal source, not a spiral source. 64 Appendix F. Proofs with government spending We complement the proofs of propositions 5 and 9, which pertain to the model with government spending. F.1. Complement to the proof of proposition 5 We characterize the amount ❕∗ in the NK model, and we compute the limit of the government- spending multiplier in the WUNK model. In the NK model, the amount ❕∗ of government spending is the amount that makes the unstable line of the dynamical system go through the natural steady state. With less spending than ❕∗ (panel B of (cid:27)gure 5), the natural steady state is below the unstable line and is connected to trajectories coming from the southwest quadrant of the phase diagram. Hence, for ❕ < ❕∗, limT→∞ c(0; ❕) = −∞. With more spending than ❕∗ (panel D of (cid:27)gure 5), the natural steady state is above the unstable line and is connected to trajectories coming from the northeast quadrant. Hence, for ❕ > ❕∗, limT→∞ c(0; ❕) = +∞. Accordingly, for any s > 0, limT→∞ m(❕∗, s) = +∞. In the WUNK model, when the ZLB is in(cid:27)nitely long-lasting, the economy jumps to the ZLB steady state at time 0: limT→∞ c(0; ❕) = c❕(❕), where c❕(❕) is given by (A42). The steady-state consumption c❕(❕) is linear in government spending ❕, with a coef(cid:27)cient in front of ❕ of (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η) . η u(cid:48)(0) δγ a κ Accordingly, for any s > 0, we have T→∞ m(❕, s) = 1 + lim = 1 + = 1 + limT→∞ c(0; ❕ + s/2) − limT→∞ c(0; ❕ − s/2) s c❕(❕ + s/2) − c❕(❕ − s/2) s (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η), η u(cid:48)(0) δγ a κ which corresponds to (13). F.2. Complement to the proof of proposition 9 We compute the government-spending multiplier at the ZLB in the WUNK model. Private con- sumption and in(cid:28)ation at the ZLB steady state are determined by (A42) and (A43). The coef(cid:27)cients 65 in front of government spending ❕ in these expressions are (cid:0) −1 (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η) η u(cid:48)(0) δγ a κ (cid:0) (cid:1)η/(1+η) − (1 + η) . u(cid:48)(0)η −1 and u(cid:48)(0) δγ a κ Since (12) holds, both coef(cid:27)cients are positive. Hence, an increase in ❕ raises private consumption and in(cid:28)ation. Moreover, dc/d❕ is given by the (cid:27)rst of these coef(cid:27)cient, which immediately yields the expression for the multiplier dy/d❕ = 1 + dc/d❕. Appendix G. WUNK assumption in terms of estimable statistics We re-express the WUNK assumption in terms of estimable statistics. We (cid:27)rst work on the model with linear disutility of labor, in which the assumption is given by (9). We then turn to the model with convex disutility of labor, in which the assumption is given by (12). G.1. Linear disutility of labor When the disutility of labor is linear, the WUNK assumption is given by (9). Multiplying (9) by yn, we obtain (cid:48)(0)yn > u 1 δ · ynκ γ a . The time discount rate δ has been estimated in numerous studies. We therefore only need to express u(cid:48)(0)yn and ynκ/(γ a) in terms of estimable statistics. First, the de(cid:27)nition of the natural rate of interest, given by (5), implies that u(cid:48)(0)yn = δ −σ −r n. Following the New Keynesian literature (for example, Woodford 2011, p. 20), we set the (cid:27)nancial- intermediation spread to σ = 0 in normal times. Hence, in normal times, u(cid:48)(0)yn = δ − r n. Thus, u(cid:48)(0)yn can be measured from the gap between the discount rate δ and the average natural rate of interest r n -- both of which have been estimated by many studies. Second, we show that ynκ/(γ a) can be measured from estimates of the New Keynesian Phillips curve. To establish this, we compute the discrete-time New Keynesian Phillips curve arising from our continuous-time model. We start from the (cid:27)rst-order approximation π(t) = π(t + dt) − (cid:219)π(t + dt)dt and use (1) to measure (cid:219)π(t + dt). We obtain π(t) = π(t + dt) − δπ(t + dt)dt + ynκ γ a · y(t) − yn yn dt . 66 (We have replaced y(t + dt)dt by y(t)dt since the difference between the two is of second order.) Setting the unit of time to one quarter (as in the empirical literature) and dt = 1, we obtain π(t) = (1 − δ)π(t + 1) + ynκ γ a x(t), (A44) where π(t) is quarterly in(cid:28)ation at time t, π(t + 1) is quarterly in(cid:28)ation at time t + 1, and x(t) = y(t) − yn yn is the output gap at time t. Equation (A44) is a typical New Keynesian Phillips curve, so we can measure ynκ/(γ a) by estimating the coef(cid:27)cient on output gap in a standard New Keynesian Phillips curve -- which has been done many times. To sum up, we rewrite the WUNK assumption as δ − r n > λ δ , where δ is the time discount rate, r n is the average natural interest rate, and λ is the output-gap coef(cid:27)cient in a standard New Keynesian Phillips curve. This is just (14). G.2. Convex disutility of labor When the disutility of labor is convex, the WUNK assumption is given by (12): (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) (cid:48)(0)yn > u 1 δ · ynκ γ a (1 + η). To rewrite this condition in terms of estimating statistics, we follow the previous method. The only change occurs when computing the discrete-time New Keynesian Phillips curve arising from the continuous-time model. To measure (cid:219)π(t + dt), we use (A40) with ❕ = 0 and c = y. As a result, (A44) becomes (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) π(t) = (1 − δ)π(t + 1) + ynκ γ a (1 + η)x(t), where π(t) and π(t + 1) are quarterly in(cid:28)ation rates and x(t) is the output gap. This is just a typical New Keynesian Phillips curve. Hence, again, we can measure (cid:18) − 1 (cid:19)η/(1+η) (1 + η) ynκ γ a 67 by estimating the output-gap coef(cid:27)cient in a standard New Keynesian Phillips curve. To conclude, just as with a linear disutility of labor, we can rewrite the WUNK assumption as δ − r n > λ δ , where δ is the time discount rate, r n is the average natural rate of interest, and λ is the output-gap coef(cid:27)cient in a standard New Keynesian Phillips curve. 68
1809.01470	1	1809	2018-09-05T13:10:18	The Core of an Economy with an Endogenous Social Division of Labour	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper considers the core of a competitive market economy with an endogenous social division of labour. The theory is founded on the notion of a "consumer-producer", who consumes as well as produces commodities. First, we show that the Core of such an economy with an endogenous social division of labour can be founded on deviations of coalitions of arbitrary size, extending the seminal insights of Vind and Schmeidler for pure exchange economies. Furthermore, we establish the equivalence between the Core and the set of competitive equilibria for continuum economies with an endogenous social division of labour. Our analysis also concludes that self-organisation in a social division of labour can be incorporated into the Edgeworthian barter process directly. This is formulated as a Core equivalence result stated for a Structured Core concept based on renegotiations among fully specialised economic agents, i.e., coalitions that use only fully developed internal divisions of labour. Our approach bridges the gap between standard economies with social production and coalition production economies. Therefore, a more straightforward and natural interpretation of coalitional improvement and the Core can be developed than for coalition production economies.	econ.TH	econ	‡e Core of an Economy with an Endogenous Social Division of Labour∗ Robert P. Gilles† June 28, 2021 Abstract OEis paper considers the core of a competitive market economy with an endogenous social di- vision of labour. OEe theory is founded on the notion of a "consumer-producer", who consumes as well as produces commodities. First, we show that the Core of such an economy with an endogenous social division of labour can be founded on deviations of coalitions of arbitrary size, extending the seminal insights of Vind and Schmeidler for pure exchange economies. Fur- thermore, we establish the equivalence between the Core and the set of competitive equilibria for continuum economies with an endogenous social division of labour. Our analysis also concludes that self-organisation in a social division of labour can be incor- porated into the Edgeworthian barter process directly. OEis is formulated as a Core equivalence result stated for a Structured Core concept based on renegotiations among fully specialised eco- nomic agents, i.e., coalitions that use only fully developed internal divisions of labour. Our approach bridges the gap between standard economies with social production and coalition production economies. OEerefore, a more straightforward and natural interpreta- tion of coalitional improvement and the Core can be developed than for coalition production economies. Keywords: Consumer-producer; Social division of labour; Competitive equilibrium; Core of an economy; Core equivalence. JEL classification: D41, D51 ∗I thank Marialaura Pesce, Dimitrios Diamantaras and Owen Sims for debates that guided me in developing this paper. †Economics Group, Management School, OEe ‹een's University of Belfast, Riddel Hall, 185 Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5EE, UK. Email: [email protected] 1 Specialisation and the social division of labour One of the oldest ideas to explain economic wealth creation is that through a functional social division of labour (Plato, 380 BCE; Smith, 1776; Mandeville, 1714; Babbage, 1835). Wealth creation in an economy with a social division of labour is founded on the interplay of two fundamental principles, namely that there are increasing returns to specialisation and that full exploitation of these returns is possible through the principle of gains from trade. OEese principles have already been explored in these early sources. OEe principle that human capital is more productive if fully specialised in the execution of a limited set of activities or the production of a limited set of closely related goods has been proposed throughout the history of economic thought, but has not yet been explored fully in contemporary economic theory. OEis paper proposes formal concepts that describe these effects of Increasing Re- turns to Specialisation (IRSpec) that are weaker than the usually employed notion of Increasing Returns to Scale (IRS). OEis is formalised by the conception that the convex hull of the full special- isation production plans capture the complete production set. We show in this paper that the property of Increasing Returns to Specialisation supports the two fundamental functions of a social division of labour, namely the generation of economic wealth and the allocation of that generated wealth. Indeed, specialised economic agents interact through a competitive price mechanism that acts as a coordination device in the process of economic wealth creation as well as a mechanism to allocate the generated wealth through the social division of labour. To pursue this, we apply the framework developed in Yang (1988) and Yang and Ng (1993).1 OEis approach represents an economic decision maker as a "consumer-producer", who is endowed with consumptive as well as productive abilities.2 Yang presented this approach as a remedy to the formal (social) dichotomy of consumption and production that is at the centre of the Walrasian theory of a market economy (Arrow and Debreu, 1954; McKenzie, 1954, 1959). However, the concept of Increasing Returns to Specialisation remains relatively unexplored in formal models based on the notion of a consumer-producer. In particular, Sun, Yang, and Zhou (2004) formalised a general equilibrium framework founded on the models of Yang (1988, 2001, 2003) and Yang and Ng (1993). In this framework, production sets of individual consumer-producers are typically bounded as well as non-convex. OEese authors restrict their model to one based on home- based production only and investigate the existence of competitive equilibrium under well-specified transaction costs. OEis formal model omits the explicit introduction of either Increasing Returns to Scale or Increasing Returns to Specialisation and, as a result, does not investigate the consequences of these fundamental hypotheses. Also, the focus on home-based production excludes the trade of intermediary inputs as part of social production processes, an essential feature of general equilib- rium models of production economies. In the present paper we try to address these omissions. 1Alternative explorations to model the idea of wealth creation through a social division of labour have been pre- sented in Young (1928); Stigler (1951); Blitch (1983); Kim (1989); Locay (1990) and Nakahashi and Feldman (2014). For an overview we also refer to Steinegger (2010) and Sun (2012). 2Technically this introduces a seŠing that is equivalent to the notion of a "coalition production economy" (Hildenbrand, 1970, 1974) which is also explored in Suzuki (1995), De Simone (1997) and Toda (2002). Suzuki, De Simone and Toda focus mainly on the technical issue of the existence of an equilibrium rather than the role of specialisation in the endogenous formation of a social division of labour. 1 We introduce the Core of an economy with an endogenous social division of labour in a rather straightforward fashion. As in coalition production economies (Hildenbrand, 1968, 1974), coali- tions are assumed to be able to create wealth through the appropriate fine-tuning of the assigned production plans to its constituting members. OEe generated outputs are then allocated for con- sumption among the members of the coalition. OEis defines a standard Core concept in the seŠing of an economy with endogenous social division of labour. We are able to show that non-Core allocations can be improved upon or "blocked" by coali- tions of arbitrary size. OEis extends the well-known results of Schmeidler (1972) and Vind (1972) on blocking in pure exchange economies. Furthermore, we show that in a continuum economy there is an equivalence between the Core and the set of competitive equilibria, fully analogous to Aumann (1964). Our Core-equivalence result improves established insights from the literature on coalition production economies, in particular the results for pseudo- and quasi-equilibria shown in Hildenbrand (1968) and Oddou (1982). In this paper we explore the introduction of a formal description of Increasing Returns to Spe- cialisation (IRSpec) at the level of the individual consumer-producer. Formally, a production set satisfies IRSpec if it is contained in the convex hull of production plans in which there is full spe- cialisation in the production of a single good -- subject to the free-disposal hypothesis. OEis property has been hinted at by Yang (2001), Yao (2002) and Diamantaras and Gilles (2004), but has not been developed fully in that literature. We address this omission in the present paper as well as the companion paper on general competitive equilibrium in an economy with an endogenous social division of labour, Gilles (2019). Finally, under IRSpec, any Core allocation can be improved upon by a coalition of fully spe- cialised individuals. In particular, this coalition consists of non-negligible subcoalitions of consumer- producers that are specialised in the production each of the marketable commodities. OEis insight is related to the result of Grodal (1972) for coalition production economies. Outline of the paper In the second section of the paper we set up the model of a consumer-producer, in particular a generalised model of production already developed in Gilles (2019). OEis allows the introduction of the production of goods through an adaptable social division of labour based on the principles of increasing returns to specialisation and gains from trade. Section 3 introduces the notion of an economy with an endogenous social division of labour and defines the notion of a competitive equilibrium. Subsequently, we introduce the notion of coalitional improvements and the concept of a Core allocation. We show that in this seŠing non- Core allocations can be blocked by coalitions of arbitrary, predetermined size, including arbitrarily large and arbitrarily small coalitions, extending the insights of Vind (1972) and Schmeidler (1972) to economies with production. We also extend the standard Core equivalence result that in continuum economies all Core allocations are competitive equilibrium allocations. Finally, in Section 3 we explore an extension of the Core, capturing that only coalitions in which members are fully specialised are able to improve upon a given allocation. We show that these δ - 2 Core allocations are fully equivalent to the Core allocations as well as the competitive equilibrium allocations in a continuum economy in which all agents have access to the same productive spe- cialisations. All proofs of the main results are collected in several appendices. 2 Economies with a social division of labour OEroughout, we consider that there are ℓ > 2 marketable commodities. OEe commodity space is therefore represented as the ℓ-dimensional Euclidean space Rℓ and the consumption space is its nonnegative orthant Rℓ +. OEe commodity space represents all bundles of tradable goods in this economy. bundle in Rℓ In particular, for k = 1, . . . , ℓ we denote by ek = (0, . . . , 0, 1, 0, . . . , 0) the k-th unit + and by e = (1, . . . , 1) the bundle consisting of one unit of each good.3 In this paper we consider an economy with a diversified production sector, which is founded on the hypothesis that all agents are participating directly in the production as well as the consumption of goods. Hence, the production in this economy is founded on an endogenous social division of labour that emanates from decisions of all individual economic agents. Consequently, economic agents are modelled as consumer-producers -- a notion formally conceived by Yang (1988). 2.1 Introducing consumer-producers A consumer-producer is formally introduced as a pair (u, P), where u : Rℓ + → R is a utility function representing the agent's consumptive preferences and P ⊂ Rℓ is the agent's production set consist- ing of production plans. Normally we can write every production plan y ∈ P as y = y+ −y−, where = y ∨ 0 is the corresponding vector of output quantities and y− = (−y) ∨ 0 is the corresponding y+ vector of input quantities. We also assume that there can be non-marketable inputs in the production process described by P -- such as the agent's labour time and land resources -- that are not explicitly modelled. We facilitate the possibility that all outputs are generated using non-marketable inputs only. OEis is referred to as "home" production. OEe approach to the modelling of production introduced here is similar to the one set out for coalition production economies in Sondermann (1974, Section 2.1).4 In this paper, the concept of a consumer-producer is introduced in a more general fashion than considered in Yang (2001), Yao (2002), Sun, Yang, and Zhou (2004) and Diamantaras and Gilles (2004). In those papers, a consumer-producer is endowed with one unit of non-marketable labour time which can be allocated to either consumption as leisure or as production of any of the con- sidered marketable commodities. Here, instead, we dispense of the explicit introduction of labour time and simplify the framework by considering production sets similar to the ones used in standard general equilibrium theory with inputs and outputs. for all commodities k = 1, . . . , ℓ; 3OEroughout, we employ the vector inequality notation that x > x ′ if xk > x ′ k for all commodities k = 1, . . . , ℓ. x > x ′ if x > x ′ and x , x ′; and x ≫ x ′ if xk > x ′ k 4In a coalition production economy, productive abilities are assigned to coalitions of economic agents. For further discussion of coalition production economies I refer to Hildenbrand (1970); Sondermann (1974); Oddou (1982) and Basile (1993). 3 With regard to our approach to production, in the production set Pa of consumer-producer a ∈ A, we distinguish two types of inputs: Marketable inputs, which are part of the ℓ commodities introduced above, and non-marketable inputs, which are assumed to be outside the realm of the commodity space. Regularity assumptions. OEe next assumption brings together the regularity properties that one expects to be satisfied by the basic descriptors of the consumptive and productive abilities of a consumer-producer. Axiom 2.1 Šroughout this paper, we assume that every agent is a consumer-producer represented by (u, P), satisfying the following properties: (i) Še utility function u : Rℓ + → R is continuous on the consumption space Rℓ the sense that for all consumption bundles x, x ′ ∈ Rℓ + and monotone in + with x ≫ x ′ it holds that u(x) > u(x ′). (ii) Še production set P ⊂ Rℓ is regular in the sense that P is a closed set that is bounded from above, 0 ∈ P and it is comprehensive in the sense that P − Rℓ + ≡ { y − z y ∈ P and z > 0 } ⊂ P. (iii) Še production set P ⊂ Rℓ is non-trivial in the sense that Conv (P) ∩ Rℓ + \ {0} , , i.e., there exists some z > 0 with z ∈ Conv P.5 (1) (2) Axiom 2.1(i) imposes that we only consider "regular" preferences in this economy. OEe imposed properties of continuity and (weak) monotonicity are standard assumptions in the general equi- librium literature. For certain results, we impose the additional assumption that preferences are strictly monotone in the sense that u(x) > u(x ′) for all x > x ′. Furthermore, Axiom 2.1(ii) imposes that we only consider production sets that satisfy certain standard regularity properties. In particular, a regular production set satisfies the properties that one has the ability to cease production altogether and the assumption of free disposal in production. Both properties are used throughout general equilibrium theory. Also, it is natural to assume that due to their size individual consumer-producers can only manage bounded production processes and are not able to grow their operations arbitrarily. OEis is expressed through the property that there is an upper bound on the individual's production set. Note that regularity does not include convexity, allowing production to exhibit non-convexities, in particular increasing returns to scale and specialisation, introducing constructions of production sets developed in the existing literature on economies with an endogenous social division of labour (Yang, 1988, 2001; Sun, Yang, and Zhou, 2004; Gilles, 2019). Finally, Axiom 2.1(iii) requires that production is non-trivial and that economic agents can achieve a meaningful productive output. OEe stated property implies that economic agents can 5Here, we denote by Conv (X ) = {λx + (1 − λ)y x, y ∈ X and 0 6 λ 6 1} the convex hull of the set X . 4 produce certain outputs without using too much inputs. OEis implies that all economic agents are assumed to have meaningful productive abilities and can contribute to the social economy produc- tively. 2.2 Defining an economy based on a social division of labour OEe set of agents is denoted by A and a typical economic agent is a ∈ A. In this paper, A is either a finite set or a continuum endowed with a complete, atomless probability measure to determine the size of coalitions in the population.6 Formally, we let A be an arbitrary set of economic consumer- producers represented by (ua , Pa ). Let Σ ⊂ 2A be a well-chosen σ -algebra of measurable coalitions in A and let µ : Σ → [0, 1] be a complete probability measure on (A, Σ). We distinguish two standard cases: (1) A = {1, . . . , n} is a countable set, Σ = 2A is the class of all subsets of A7 and µ is the normalised counting measure on Σ. (2) A is an uncountably infinite set, Σ is a σ -algebra of measurable subsets of A and µ is an atomless probability measure on Σ. In the remainder of this paper case (1) is denoted as a "finite" economy. OEe second case (2) is denoted as a "continuum" economy. We now develop the model of an economy in which all agents are represented as consumer- producers and simultaneously make decisions regarding consumption and production under a given vector of competitive market prices. It is implicitly assumed that all consumer-producers are pow- erless to influence the price level through their consumption and/or production decisions. Hence, the model is a direct extension of the standard model of an economy with (social) production. Definition 2.2 An economy with ℓ commodities is a triple E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi where (i) (A, Σ, µ) is a complete probability space of consumer-producers, represented by (ua , Pa ) for every a ∈ A; (ii) Še utility function u(·, x) : A → R is measurable on the probability space (A, Σ, µ); (iii) Še correspondence of production sets P : A → 2Rℓ + has a measurable graph on the probability space (A, Σ, µ) such that the correspondence P is integrably bounded from above8 and; (iv) For every agent a ∈ A the pair (ua , Pa ) satisfies Axiom 2.1. An economy E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi is a continuum economy if the complete probability space of consumer-producers (A, Σ, µ) is atomless. An allocation in an economy E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi is a pair (f , ❕) where f : A → Rℓ + is an integrable assignment of final consumption bundles and ❕ is an integrable selection of the production corre- spondence P. OEus, an allocation (f , ❕) consists of a consumption plan f and a social production plan ❕. 6OEere also is the possibility to consider mixed cases as well in which there is a continuum of negligible agents and countably many non-negligible agents, represented by atoms (Shitovitz, 1973, 1982). We do not address these cases in the theory developed in this paper. 7On a non-finite, countable agent set A, Σ can also be interpreted here as the σ -algebra generated by the finite subsets of A. 8Hence, we impose that there exists some integrable function ❕ : A → Rℓ such that for almost every agent a ∈ A and every production plan y ∈ PA : y 6 ❕(a). 5 An allocation (f , ❕) is now feasible if all allocated consumption bundles are covered by the produced quantities of all commodities, i.e., Þ f dµ 6Þ ❕ dµ. 3 Competitive equilibria and the Core (3) ‡e consumer-producer problem. An individual consumer-producer a ∈ A operating in a sys- tem of perfectly competitive markets faces a vector p ∈ Rℓ + \ {0} of prices for the ℓ marketable commodities. Consequently, she optimises her utility over the set of the feasible consumption- production plans with the goal to maximise consumptive satisfaction. OEis optimisation problem is denoted as the "consumer-producer problem": Every consumer-producer a ∈ A aims to select a consumption plan x ∈ Rℓ y ∈ Rℓ such that ( x , y) solves + and production plan max (cid:8)ua (x) (cid:12)(cid:12) x ∈ Rℓ + , y ∈ Pa and p · x 6 p · y (cid:9) . (4) In this statement, x ∈ Rℓ + denotes the final consumption bundle, while y ∈ Rℓ is referred to as the production plan executed by agent a. Now, t = y − x ∈ Rℓ is the vector of net trades submiŠed to the market. We first establish that the consumer-producer problem stated here has actually a solution under the regularity conditions imposed. Lemma 3.1 (Solution to the Consumer-Producer Problem) Let a ∈ A and let (ua , Pa ) satisfy regularity Axiom 2.1. Šen the consumer-producer problem for a ∈ A stated in (4) has a solution for any strictly positive price vector p ≫ 0. A proof of this existence result follows immediately from the weak dichotomy between the con- sumption and production decisions stated in Gilles (2019). Competitive equilibria. An equilibrium in an economy can now be introduced as a feasible allocation that is supported by a price vector for which nearly all consumer-producers select optimal consumption and production plans. Definition 3.2 Consider an economy E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi. An allocation (f , ❕) is a competitive equilibrium in E if (f , ❕) is feasible and there exists some strictly positive price vector p ≫ 0 such that∫ f dµ = ∫ ❕ dµ and for almost every agent a ∈ A, the consumption-production plan (f (a), ❕(a)) solve a's consumer-producer problem (4). Še price vector p is denoted as an equilibrium price for the equilibrium allocation (f , ❕). Še collection of all equilibrium allocations in the economy E is denoted by W(E) = {(f , ❕) (f , ❕) is a competitive equilibrium in E}. (5) 6 We restrict our focus on competitive equilibria with strictly positive equilibrium prices only. OEis restriction is more plausible in the seŠing of an economy with agent-based production as considered here. OEis restriction also strengthens the Core equivalence result developed subsequently in this paper, since it reduces the size of the set of considered equilibria in the economy. OEe existence of competitive equilibria in these economies with an endogenous social division of labour is addressed in Gilles (2019), in particular Section 3 and OEeorem 3.6. OEere it is shown that to show existence of meaningful competitive equilibria, the production sets of the consumer- producers in the economy have to satisfy properties describing Increasing Returns to Specialisation. We refer to Section 4 of this paper for an elaborate discussion. A Core concept. OEe Core of a continuum economy with production was seminally set out in Hildenbrand (1968). OEe model proposed was that of a coalition production economy in which production was assigned to coalitions rather than separate social production organisations or "pro- ducers". In our notion of an economy with an endogenous social division of labour, production is as- signed to the consumer-producers individually, which results in a natural formulation of coalitional improvement in the Edgeworthian bargaining process. Consequently, we are able to formulate the concept of an Edgeworthian Core allocation in a rather straightforward fashion. Definition 3.3 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be some economy. A coalition S ∈ Σ is able to improve upon an allocation (f , ❕) in E if S is non-negligible in the sense that µ(S) > 0 and there exists a coalitional allocation (f ′, ❕′) : S → Rℓ + × Rℓ such that (i) ua (f ′(a) ) > ua (f (a)) for almost every agent a ∈ S, and (ii) ∫S f ′ dµ 6 ∫S ❕′ dµ. A feasible allocation (f , ❕) in E is a Core allocation if there is no coalition S ∈ Σ that can improve upon it. We denote by C(E) = {(f , ❕) (f , ❕) is a Core allocation } (6) the Core of the economy E. A coalition that can improve upon a given allocation is also known as a blocking coalition. 3.1 An extension of the Vind-Schmeidler ‡eorem. One of the classical questions in mathematical economics has been what type of blocking coalitions there are. One particular question is about the size of the blocking coalition. OEis was pursued in Schmeidler (1972); Grodal (1972); Vind (1972) and Greenberg, Weber, and Yamazaki (2007). OEese results can quite naturally be transferred to the seŠing of an economy with an endogenous social division of labour. OEe next result addresses the size of blocking coalitions there emerge in a continuum economy. It extends the insights from Schmeidler (1972) and Vind (1972) to the realm of continuum economies 7 with an endogenous social division of labour. In particular, in the context of our notion of an econ- omy, the concept of a consumer-producer incorporates the property that production is completely scalable as well through the adaptation of the social division of labour. OEis property carries over to blocking coalitions in the sense that improving on a proposed allocation can be done through a set of completely specialised coalitions of consumer-producers. ‡eorem 3.4 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be some continuum economy, in which (A, Σ, µ) is a complete atomless probability space for which the properties stated in Definition 2.2 hold and all preferences are strictly monotone. Let 0 < δ < 1 be any real number. Šen for any non-Core allocation (f , ❕) in E, there exists a blocking coalition S ∈ Σ with µ(S) = δ . For a proof of OEeorem 3.4 we refer to Appendix A of this paper. 3.2 Core equivalence One of the classical results from the Edgeworthian approach to trade has been the Core equivalence theorem, seminally established for pure exchange economies by Aumann (1964) and for coalition production economies by Hildenbrand (1968). Here, we are able to establish full Core equivalence for a continuum economy with an endogenous social division of labour, supplementing the results stated in Hildenbrand (1968, 1974) for coalition production economies. We are able to establish the equivalence of the Core and the set of competitive equilibria supported by strictly positive prices for economies with an endogenous social division of labour under the accepted monotonicity hypotheses. ‡eorem 3.5 (Core Equivalence) Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be some economy that satisfies the properties stated in Definition 2.2. (a) Every competitive equilibrium in E is a Core allocation. (b) If (A, Σ, µ) is an atomless probability space and all utility functions ua, a ∈ A, are strictly monotone, then every Core allocation in E can be supported as a competitive equilibrium with a strictly positive equilibrium price vector, i.e., C(E) = W(E). A proof of OEeorem 3.5 is provided in Appendix B of this paper. OEe Core equivalence result establishes that our framework is a natural representation of modelling production in a continuum economy without relying on weaker concepts such as pseudo- and quasi- equilibria. 4 ‡e Core and the social division of labour 4.1 Increasing returns to specialisation OEe generation of economic wealth in a social division of labour is founded on the presence of increasing returns to specialisation: Specialising in the production of a single good leads to dispro- portional increases in the marginal product of that particular good. In the framework developed here, this fundamental hypothesis is introduced in two forms. 8 Definition 4.1 Consider a production set P ⊂ Rℓ satisfying the properties stated in Axiom 2.1. Full specialisation: Let k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ} be some commodity. A production plan zk ∈ P is a full specialisation production plan for commodity k if there exists some positive output quantity Q k > 0 and some input vector yk ∈ Rℓ = 0 such that zk = Q k ek − yk . + with yk k IRSpec: Še production set P exhibits Increasing Returns to Specialisation if for every commod- ity k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ} there exists some full specialisation production plan zk = Q k ek −yk ∈ P such that 9 Q ⊂ P ⊂ Conv Q − Rℓ + (7) where Q = (cid:8) z1, . . . , z ℓ(cid:9) is the set of these ℓ full specialisation production plans. OEe definition above reflects the traditional idea underpinning the social division of labour (Smith, 1776, Chapter 1) that specialising in the production of a single good increases one's productivity. If a production set exhibits IRSpec, the production set is simply non-convex with the maximal production bundles achieved along the ℓ full specialisation production plans. Here, Q k > 0 denotes the quantity of good k that the consumer-producer can produce under full specialisation, requiring input vector yk > 0. OEis notion was seminally introduced in Gilles (2019), where two variations of Increasing Returns to Specialisation are considered. OEe property introduced here is denoted as Weakly Increasing Returns to Specialisation (WIRSpec) in Gilles (2019).10 Obviously, WIRSpec implies that the production set P is strictly bounded. We also remark that, if P is home-based, then P satisfies WIRSpec if there exist output quantities Q k > 0 for all k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ} with P ⊂ Conv Q − Rℓ + where Q = (cid:8)Q 1e1, . . . , Q ℓeℓ(cid:9). For an elaborate discussion of these concepts and their consequences we also refer to Gilles (2019). 4.2 A Structured Core concept For the subsequent discussion of the role of the social division of labour in the Edgeworthian trade processes underlying the Core, we need to introduce the notion that the production of goods in an economy is founded on a given set of professions or specialisations. In particular, we focus on the ability of professional associations or guilds to arise that can exercise the power to block a certain allocation. OEis underlies the following definition of a modification of the Core concept. Definition 4.2 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be some economy satisfying the properties of Definition 2.2 such that almost all agents are endowed with a production set that satisfies IRSpec. Denote by Qa ⊂ Rℓ the set of ℓ full specialisation production plans for agent a ∈ A with the property that Qa ⊂ Pa ⊂ Conv Qa − Rℓ +, as introduced in Definition 4.1. 9Here, we use the notational convention that Conv S = {λx + (1 − λ)y x, y ∈ S and 0 6 λ 6 1} denotes the convex hull of the set S. 10Gilles (2019) also introduces the related notion of Strictly Increasing Returns to Specialisation (SIRSpec), which additionally imposes that P ∩ (ConvQ) = Q. OEis imposes that there are strict productivity increases from specialising in the production of a single output. OEis implies that income maximisers are exactly those full specialisation production plans. 9 (i) Let S ∈ Σ with µ(S) > 0 be a non-negligible coalition. A production plan ❕ : S → Rℓstructures the coalition S through an internal social division of labour if for every k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ} there exists a coalition Sk ∈ Σ with µ(Sk ) > 0 such that 1. 2. {S1, . . . , S ℓ } partitions S, i.e., S = ∪ℓ k =1Sk and Sm ∩ Sm′ = for all m , m′ and; every agent a ∈ Sk is specialised in the production of commodity k only, in the sense that ❕(a) = Q k (a)ek − yk (a) ∈ Qa ⊂ Pa is a full specialisation production plan for commodity k for agent a ∈ Sk . (ii) Še allocation (f , ❕) is a Structured Core allocation if there is no non-negligible coalition S ∈ Σ with µ(S) > 0 that can improve upon (f , ❕) through an allocation (f ′, ❕′) : S → Rℓ + × Rℓ such that the production plan ❕′ structures the coalition S through an internal social division of labour. Še collection of all Structured Core allocations in E is denoted by CS (E). A coalition that organises itself through an internal social division of labour based on full specialisa- tion production plans only can be interpreted as an alliance between ℓ different professional guilds, which members specialise in the production of only one good. OEe Structured Core now collects exactly those allocations that cannot be blocked through such alliances. It means that trade only occurs between fully specialised economic agents in the prevailing social division of labour. OEis imposes restrictions on blocking, typically enlarging the Core considerably, i.e., C(E) ⊂ CS (E). OEe next theorem asserts that there is an equivalence between Core and Structured Core alloca- tions in continuum economies in which the production technologies satisfy the increasing returns to specialisation (IRSpec) property, subject to standard regularity conditions on the preferences of the economic agents. ‡eorem 4.3 (Structured Core Equivalence) Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be a continuum economy, for which the assumptions formulated in Definition 2.2 hold and almost all agents are endowed with a production set that satisfies IRSpec. Šen, if all utility functions ua, a ∈ A, are strictly monotone, every non-Core allocation can be improved upon by a non-negligible coalition S ∈ Σ with an internal social division of labour, i.e., CS (E) = C(E) = W(E). A proof of OEeorem 4.3 is provided in Appendix C. Using the proof of OEeorem 3.4, a simple modification of the proof of OEeorem 4.3 implies the following corollary. Corollary 4.4 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be a continuum economy, for which the assumptions for- mulated in Definition 2.2 hold and almost all agents are endowed with a production set that satisfies IRSpec. Let 0 6 δ 6 1. Šen, if all utility functions ua, a ∈ A, are strictly monotone, every non-Core allocation can be improved upon by a non-negligible coalition S ∈ Σ with µ(S) = δ that is structured through an internal social division of labour. 10 4.3 Structured Equilibria under IRSpec Under the Increasing Returns to Specialisation (IRSpec) property of the productive abilities of the consumer-producers in an economy, Gilles (2019) showed that the selected production plans un- der any positive price vector are fully specialised (Gilles, 2019, OEeorem 2.7). OEis gives rise to introducing a class of competitive equilibria that incorporate this property. Definition 4.5 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be an economy, for which the assumptions formulated in Definition 2.2 hold and almost all agents a ∈ A are endowed with a production set Pa that satisfies IRSpec for the set of ℓ full specialisation production plans Qa = {z1 An allocation (f , ❕) is a structured equilibrium in E if there exists a positive price vector p ≫ 0 such that∫ f dµ =∫ ❕ dµ and for almost every agent a ∈ A, the consumption-production plan (f (a), ❕(a)) solve a's consumer-producer problem (4) with ❕(a) ∈ Qa. Še class of structured equilibria of E is denoted by WS (E) ⊂ W(E). a , . . . , z ℓ a }. OEe notion of a structured equilibrium refers to the endogenous organisation of the economy through a social division of labour through a price mechanism as seminally alluded to by Smith (1759, 1776) as his "invisible hand" mechanism. Here I am particularly interested in the question whether interactions within coalitions that are internally organised through an appropriately cho- sen social division of labour lead to outcomes that are exactly those identified structured equilibria. Hence, do interactions in structured coalitions result in global outcomes that are guided through a price-based invisible hand to a global social division of labour? Our insights indeed confirm that this is the case. Formally, this can be stated as a corollary from the previously shown insights. In particular, application of OEeorem 2.7 of Gilles (2019) and the Structured Core Equivalence OEeorem 4.3 results in the following corollary: Corollary 4.6 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be an economy, for which the assumptions formulated in Definition 2.2 hold and almost all agents a ∈ A are endowed with a production set Pa that satisfies IRSpec for the set of ℓ full specialisation production plans Qa . Šen, if all utility functions ua, a ∈ A, are strictly monotone, then every structured core allocation can be supported as a structured equilibrium, i.e., CS (E) = C(E) = W(E) = WS (E). 11 References Arrow, K. J., and G. Debreu (1954): "Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy," Econo- metrica, 22, 265 -- 290. Aumann, R. J. (1964): "Markets with a Continuum of Traders," Econometrica, 32, 39 -- 50. Babbage, C. (1835): On the Economy of Machinery and Manufacturers. Augustus M. Kelley Publish- ers, London, UK, 4th enlarged edn. Basile, A. (1993): "Finitely Additive Nonatomic Coalition Production Economies: Core-Walras Equivalence," International Economic Review, 34(4), 983 -- 994. Blitch, C. P. (1983): "Allyn Young on Increasing Returns," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5, 359 -- 372. De Simone, A. (1997): "Existence of Equilibria in Finitely Additive Nonatomic Coalition Production Economies," Journal of Applied Analysis, 3(2), 249 -- 267. Diamantaras, D., and R. P. Gilles (2004): "On the Microeconomics of Specialization," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 223 -- 236. Gilles, R. P. (2019): "Market Economies with an Endogenous Social Division of Labour," Interna- tional Economic Review, forthcoming. Greenberg, J., S. Weber, and A. Yamazaki (2007): "On Blocking Coalitions: Linking Mas-Colell with Grodal-Schmeidler-Vind," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 43, 615 -- 628. Grodal, B. (1972): "A Second Remark on the Core of an Atomless Economy," Econometrica, 40, 581 -- 583. Hildenbrand, W. (1968): "OEe Core of an Economy with a Measure Space of Economic Agents," Review of Economic Studies, 35, 443 -- 452. (1970): "Existence of Equilibria for Economies with Production and a Measure Space of Consumers," Econometrica, 38, 608 -- 623. (1974): Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Kim, S. (1989): "Labor Specialization and the Extent of the Market," Journal of Political Economy, 97, 692 -- 705. Locay, L. (1990): "Economic Development and the Division of Production between Households and Markets," Journal of Political Economy, 98, 965 -- 982. Mandeville, B. (1714): Še Fable of the Bees; Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. J. Tonson, London, UK, 1924 edn. McKenzie, L. W. (1954): "On Equilibrium in Graham's Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems," Econometrica, 22(2), 147 -- 161. (1959): "On the Existence of General Equilibrium for a Competitive Market," Econometrica, 27, 54 -- 71. Nakahashi, W., and M. W. Feldman (2014): "Evolution of Division of Labor: Emergence of Differ- ent Activities among Group Members," Journal of Šeoretical Biology, 348, 65 -- 79. 12 Oddou, C. (1982): "OEe Core of a Coalition Production Economy," Journal of Mathematical Eco- nomics, 9, 1 -- 21. Plato (380 BCE): Republic. Penguin Classics, London, UK, 2007 edn. Schmeidler, D. (1972): "A Remark on the Core of an Atomless Economy," Econometrica, 40, 579 -- 580. Shitovitz, B. (1973): "Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders," Econometrica, 41, 467 -- 501. (1982): "Some Notes on the Core of a Production Economy with Some Large and a Contin- uum of Small Traders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, 9, 99 -- 105. Smith, A. (1759): Še Šeory of Moral Sentiments, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Reprint 2002, edited by Knud Haakonssen. (1776): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, Reprint 1976. Sondermann, D. (1974): "Economies of Scale and Equilibria in Coalition Production Economies," Journal of Economic Šeory, 8, 259 -- 291. Steinegger, R. (2010): An Economic Šeory of the Division of Labor: From Adam Smith to Xiaokai Yang and Inframarginal Analysis. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Saarbrucken, Germany. Stigler, G. J. (1951): "OEe Division of Labor is LimiŠed by the Extent of the Market," Journal of Political Economy, 59, 185 -- 193. Sun, G. (2012): Še Division of Labor in Economics: A History, Routledge Studies in the History of Economics. Routledge, London, UK. Sun, G., X. Yang, and L. Zhou (2004): "General Equilibria in Large Economies with Endogenous Structure of Division of Labor," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 237 -- 256. Suzuki, T. (1995): "Nonconvex Production Economies," Journal of Economic Theory, 66, 158 -- 177. Toda, M. (2002): "Core and Equilibria in Non-convex Economies," Proceedings of the Institute for Mathematical Sciences Kokyu, 1264, 91 -- 103. Vind, K. (1972): "A OEird Remark on the Core of an Atomless Economy," Econometrica, 40, 585 -- 586. Yang, X. (1988): "A Microeconomic Approach to Modeling the Division of Labor Based on Increas- ing Returns to Specialization," Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey. (2001): Economics: New Classical Versus Neoclassical Frameworks. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MassachuseŠs. (2003): Economic Development and the Division of Labor. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MassachuseŠs. Yang, X., and Y.-K. Ng (1993): Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeco- nomic Framework. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Yao, S. (2002): "Walrasian Equilibrium Computation, Network Formation, and the Wen Theorem," Review of Development Economics, 6, 415 -- 427. Young, A. A. (1928): "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," Economic Journal, 38, 527 -- 542. 13 Appendices: Proofs of the main theorems A Proof of ‡eorem 3.4 Consider a continuum economy E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi such that (A, Σ, µ) is atomless. Let (f , ❕) be some non-Core allocation in E. Hence, there exists some S ∈ Σ with µ(S) > 0 and a coalitional allocation (f ′, ❕′) with f ′ : S → Rℓ + and ❕′ : S → Rℓ such that (i) ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) ≡ ¯ua for every a ∈ S; (ii) ❕′(a) ∈ Pa for every a ∈ S, and; (iii) ∫S f ′ dµ =∫S ❕′ dµ. Let 0 < δ < 1. We now consider three cases: z µ(S) = δ In this case the assertion of OEeorem 3.4 is satisfied for S itself. z µ(S) > δ A proof can easily be constructed on the argument introduced in Schmeidler (1972). Indeed, intro- duce a multi-dimensional measure ν : Σ → Rℓ+1 on (A, Σ, µ) restricted to S by + ν (T ) = (cid:18)ÞT (f ′ − ❕′) dµ , µ(T )(cid:19) ∈ Rℓ+1 + for any T ⊂ S (8) Now by Liapunov's Convexity OEeorem, e.g., OEeorem 3 in Hildenbrand (1974, page 62), it follows that ν results in a convex image. Obviously ν () = (0, . . . , 0, 0) and ν (S) = (0, . . . , 0, µ(S)). Hence, there has to exist some T ⊂ S such that ν (T ) = (0, . . . , 0, δ ). Clearly the coalition T now improves upon (f , ❕) through (f ′, ❕′) such that µ(T ) = δ , showing the assertion. z µ(S) < δ We modify the proof seminally devised by Vind (1972). Let 0 < ε < 1 be arbitrarily chosen. Since the restricted probability space (S, ΣS , µ) is atomless as well, we know by Liapunov's Con- + is a convex set. Hence, there exists an integrable selection Pa dµ(a) ⊂ Rℓ ❕ : S → Rℓ vexity OEeorem that∫S ❕ dµ = εÞS ÞS ❕′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS + such that ❕(a) ∈ Pa for a ∈ S and ❕ dµ (9) Furthermore, the continuity (Axiom 2.1(i)) and measurability of all preferences implies that there exists f ′′ : S → Rℓ + with ua (f ′′(a) ) > ¯ua for every a ∈ S ÞS f ′′ dµ =ÞS ❕′ dµ − y for some y > 0. Since the correspondence {x ∈ Rℓ OEeorem it follows that + ua (x) > ¯ua } is measurable on S, by Liapunov's Convexity ÞS (cid:8) x ∈ Rℓ +(cid:12)(cid:12) ua (x) > ¯ua(cid:9) dµ(a) ⊂ Rℓ + 14 is a convex set. Hence, since∫S f ′′ dµ is in this integral and∫S f dµ is on its boundary, there exists some integrable selection f : S → Rℓ + such that ua (cid:16) f (a)(cid:17) > ¯ua f dµ = εÞS ÞS for every a ∈ S f ′′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS f dµ Since µ is atomless, we can now take T ⊂ A \ S with T ∈ Σ, µ(T ) = (1 − ε)µ(A \ S) > 0 and ÞT (f − ❕) dµ = (1 − ε)ÞA\S (f − ❕) dµ. Now consider the coalition S ∪ T ∈ Σ and define the allocation(cid:16) f , ❕(cid:17) by (10) (11) (12) f (a) =   f (a) a ∈ S f (a) + ε µ(T )y a ∈ T and ❕(a) a ∈ S ❕(a) a ∈ T . ❕(a) =   Now it follows easily from the above that for a ∈ S ua (cid:16) f (a)(cid:17) = ua (cid:16) f (a)(cid:17) > ¯ua and, due to strict monotonicity of ua , for every a ∈ T ua (cid:16) f (a)(cid:17) = ua (cid:16) f (a) + ε µ(T )y(cid:17) > ¯ua . Moreover, we establish that ÞS ∪T f dµ +ÞT f dµ + εy = f ′′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS f dµ +ÞT f dµ + εy = f dµ =ÞS = εÞS = εÞS = εÞS = εÞS = εÞS f dµ + εy = εÞS f dµ +ÞT ❕′ dµ − εy + (1 − ε)ÞS f dµ +ÞT ❕′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS f dµ + (1 − ε)ÞA\S ❕′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS ❕′ dµ + (1 − ε)Þ ❕ dµ − (1 − ε)ÞA\S ❕ dµ =ÞS ❕′ dµ + (1 − ε)ÞS ❕ dµ +ÞT (f − ❕) dµ +ÞT ❕ dµ = (f − ❕) dµ +ÞT ❕ dµ +ÞT ❕ dµ +ÞT ❕ dµ = ❕ dµ = ❕ dµ =ÞS ∪T ❕ dµ (13) OEis shows that S ∪ T can improve upon (f , ❕) through (cid:16) f , ❕(cid:17). Now select ε = 1 − δ 1 − µ(S) then it is easily established that 0 < ε < 1 -- since 0 < µ(S) < δ < 1 -- and that µ(S ∪ T ) = µ(S) + (1 − ε)µ(A \ S) = δ . OEis completes the proof of the assertion. 15 B Proof of ‡eorem 3.5 B.1 Proof of ‡eorem 3.5(a) Suppose that (f , ❕) is a competitive equilibrium in the economy E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi for the equi- librium price p ∈ Rℓ Suppose to the contrary that (f , ❕) is not a Core allocation in E. OEen there exists some non- negligible coalition S ∈ Σ with µ(S) > 0 and a pair (f ′, ❕′) such that ❕′(a) ∈ Pa for all a ∈ S, + with p ≫ 0. ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) for all a ∈ S and∫S f ′ dµ 6∫S ❕′ dµ. From the assumption that ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) for all a ∈ S, it follows from the consumer-producer problem for all a ∈ S that p · f ′(a) > p · ❕(a) > p · ❕′(a) for almost all a ∈ S.11 Hence, p ·ÞS f ′ dµ =ÞS p · f ′(a) dµ(a) >ÞS p · ❕′(a) dµ(a) = p ·ÞS ❕′ dµ. OEis contradicts the assumed property that∫S f ′ dµ 6∫S ❕′ dµ. Hence, we have shown the assertion. B.2 Proof of ‡eorem 3.5(b) OEe proof of this assertion is a modification of the standard methodology introduced by Aumann (1964) and elaborated in Hildenbrand (1974, Section 2.1). Let (f , ❕) be a Core allocation in the continuum economy E. For every agent a ∈ A we define the consumption bundles that are preferred to f (a) by U(a) = (cid:8) x ∈ Rℓ +(cid:12)(cid:12) ua (x) > ua (f (a))(cid:9) Also, define for a ∈ A: Z(a) = { U(a) − Pa } ∪ {0} ⊂ Rℓ (14) (15) + is a measurable correspondence and as a consequence, Z : A ։ Rℓ is a measur- OEen U : A ։ Rℓ able correspondence as well. Now by standard arguments (Hildenbrand, 1974, OEeorem 3, page 62), We explore the properties of the correspondence Z through a sequence of lemmas. ∫ Z dµ is convex and non-empty. (In particular, 0 ∈∫ Z dµ.) Lemma B.1 ∫ Z dµ ∩ Rℓ tion h : A → Rℓ such that h(a) ∈ Z(a) for almost all a ∈ A and∫ h dµ < 0. Next, let S = {a ∈ A h(a) , 0} ∈ Σ. Since∫ h dµ < 0 it holds that µ(S) > 0. − = {0}. Proof. Suppose to the contrary that the claim does not hold. OEen there exists an integrable selec- OEerefore, there exist integrable selections f ′ in U and ❕′ in P such that h = f ′ − ❕′ with h(a) = 0 if a < S. For every agent a ∈ S we let f ′′(a) = f ′(a) − 1 µ(S)Þ h dµ ∈ Rℓ + (16) In particular, since∫ h dµ < 0, it holds that f ′′(a) > f ′(a) for every a ∈ S and, therefore, by strict monotonicity of a's preferences we conclude that ua (f ′′(a)) > ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) 11Here, note that p · ❕(a) = max p · Pa is the maximal income that agent a can generate in this economy under price vector p ≫ 0. OEis follows from the fact that (f (a), ❕(a)) is a solution to a's consumer-producer problem. See also Gilles (2019, OEeorem 2.4). 16 Also, we can easily establish that by definition ÞS f ′′ dµ =ÞS =ÞS f ′ dµ −Þ h dµ = f ′ dµ −ÞS h dµ =ÞS ❕′ dµ. OEus, the coalition S is able to improve upon (f , ❕) through the coalitional allocation (f ′′, ❕′). OEis contradicts the hypothesis that (f , ❕) is a Core allocation. OEus, we have shown the assertion of Lemma B.1. Now by Lemma B.1 we may apply Minkowski's Separation OEeorem (Hildenbrand, 1974, page 38) to∫ Z dµ and Rℓ −. OEerefore, there exists a normal vector p > 0 such that p ·∫ Z dµ > 0. In particular, since 0 ∈ Z(a), it follows that Hence, inf p · Z(a) > 0 for almost every a ∈ A. inf p · Z(a) = 0. So, we conclude now that for every x ∈ Rℓ + : ua (x) > ua (f (a)) implies p · x > I (a, p) ≡ sup p · Pa (17) OEis now leads to the following claims: Lemma B.2 For almost every a ∈ A: p · f (a) = I (a, p) > 0. Proof. Let a ∈ A. By continuity of the utility function ua it follows from (17) that p · f (a) > I (a, p). Now suppose that the assertion of Lemma B.2 is not true, then there exists a coalition S with µ(S) > 0 and for all a ∈ S : p · f (a) > I (a, p). OEen p ·Þ f dµ >Þ I (·, p) dµ > p ·Þ ❕ dµ. Since p > 0, this property contradicts that (f , ❕) is feasible. Hence, p · f (a) = I (a, p). Finally, by Axiom 2.1(iii), for a ∈ A there exists some strictly positive vector za > 0 in the convex hull of the production set Pa , i.e., za ∈ Conv Pa . Hence, since p > 0, we conclude that I (a, p) = sup p · Pa > p · za > 0, leading to the conclusion that Lemma B.2 holds. Lemma B.3 For almost every a ∈ A: p · ❕(a) = I (a, p). Proof. Since ❕(a) ∈ Pa it follows that p · ❕(a) 6 I (a, p). Suppose that the assertion of Lemma B.3 is not true, then there exists a coalition S with µ(S) > 0 and p · ❕(a) < I (a, p). Since by Lemma B.2, p · f (a) = I (a, p) for almost all a ∈ A, we conclude that p ·Þ f dµ =Þ I (a, p) dµ(a) > p ·Þ ❕ dµ. Hence, by p > 0,∫ f dµ > ∫ ❕ dµ, which contradicts the feasibility of (f , ❕). OEus we have shown the validity of Lemma B.3. Lemma B.4 For almost every a ∈ A: f (a) is ua-maximal in the budget set B(a, p) = (cid:8) x ∈ Rℓ +(cid:12)(cid:12) p · x 6 I (a, p)(cid:9) , . Proof. Suppose 0 6 p · x < I (a, p) for x ∈ Rℓ Suppose p · x = I (a, p) for x ∈ Rℓ we conclude that by continuity of ua, ua (x) 6 ua (f (a)) as well. +, then, by (17), ua (x) 6 ua (f (a)). +, then there exists a sequence x n → x with p · x n < I (a, p). OEus, 17 Lemma B.5 From strict monotonicity of all agents' preferences, it follows that p ≫ 0 and I (a, p) > 0 for almost every agent a ∈ A. Proof. If p > 0 is such that at least one good k ∈ {1, . . . ′ ℓ} has a zero price pk = 0, it follows that f ′(a) = f (a) + ek ∈ B(a, p) for almost all agents a ∈ A. By strict monotonicity of ua it then follows that ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)), which contradicts Lemma B.4. OEis implies that p ≫ 0. Furthermore, by Axiom 2.1(iii), for every a ∈ A there exists some positive vector za > 0 in the convex hull of the production set Pa , i.e., za ∈ Conv Pa . Hence, since p ≫ 0, we conclude that I (a, p) = sup p · Pa > p · za > 0. OEis proves Lemma B.5. OEe property that p ≫ 0 (Lemma B.5) together with the assertions stated in Lemmas B.3 and B.4 imply that the allocation (f , ❕) is indeed a competitive equilibrium supported by the price vector p. OEis proves the assertion of OEeorem 3.5(b). C Proof of ‡eorem 4.3 Let E = h (A, Σ, µ), u, Pi be some continuum economy, in which (A, Σ, µ) is a complete atomless probability space for which the assumptions introduced in Axiom 2.1 and Definition 2.2 hold and all utility functions ua, a ∈ A, are strictly monotone. As stated in the assertion, we also suppose that all agents in E have productive abilities that are subject to Increasing Returns to Specialisation (IRSpec), i.e., for almost every agent a ∈ A: Q(a) ⊂ Pa ⊂ Conv Q(a) − Rℓ +, where Q(a) = (cid:8)Q 1(a)e1 − y1(a), . . . , Q ℓ(a)eℓ − yℓ(a)(cid:9) . for well-selected output levels Q k (a) > 0 and input vectors yk (a) ∈ Rℓ We introduce some auxiliary notation. In particular, we define for every a ∈ A: + for k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ}. Q(a) = Conv Q(a) Now we can prove the following assertion: (18) (19) Lemma C.1 Še correspondences Q : A → 2Rℓ and Q : A → 2Rℓ have a measurable graph. Proof. First, as assumed in Definition 2.2, the correspondence P : A → 2Rℓ has a measurable graph and is closed-valued. From the IRSpec property it follows that for every a ∈ A and for every k ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ} the maximisation problem max ϕk (x) = ek · x such that x ∈ Pa has a unique solution given by ϕk (za k Proposition 3 in Hildenbrand (1974, page 60) now implies that a 7→ za the complete probability space (A, Σ, µ). OEis, in turn, implies that ) = Q k (a) with za k = Q k (a)ek − yk (a) ∈ Q(a). k is a measurable function on a 7→ Q(a) = (cid:8)Q 1(a)e1 − y1(a), . . . , Q ℓ(a)eℓ − yℓ(a)(cid:9) = ℓk =1(cid:8)za k(cid:9) has a measurable graph on (A, Σ, µ). Finally, by the Corollary of Proposition 3 in Hildenbrand (1974, page 60), this implies that the cor- respondence Q : A → 2Rℓ that assigns to every a ∈ A the convex hull Conv Q(a) of the finite set Q(a) has a measurable graph. From OEeorem 3.5 it follows that C(E) = W(E) ⊂ CS (E). It is le‰ to show that CS (E) ⊂ C(E). 18 Now, let (f , ❕) < C(E) be some non-Core allocation in E. Hence, there exists some S ∈ Σ with µ(S) > 0 and a coalitional allocation (f ′, ❕′) with f ′ : S → Rℓ + and ❕′ : S → Rℓ such that (i) ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) ≡ ¯ua for every a ∈ S; (ii) ❕′(a) ∈ Pa for every a ∈ S, and; Next, since Q has a measurable graph by Lemma C.1, we may define (iii) ∫S f ′ dµ =∫S ❕′ dµ. QS =ÞS Q(a) dµ(a) (20) We note that, by OEeorem 4 in Hildenbrand (1974, page 64), from the atomlessness of (A, Σ, µ) it follows that QS =ÞS Conv Q(a) dµ(a) =ÞS Q(a) dµ(a) , is a closed and convex set.12 We now claim the following property: (21) Lemma C.2 Without loss of generality, we may assume that∫S ❕′ dµ ∈ QS . Proof. Suppose to the contrary that∫S ❕′ dµ < QS . OEen there exists a subcoalition T ⊂ S with µ(T ) > 0 such that ❕′(a) < Q(a) for every a ∈ T . Note first that for every a ∈ A the convex set Q(a) ⊂ Rℓ is an (ℓ − 1)-dimensional subspace of Rℓ. +, ❕′(a) ∈ Pa and Q(a) is (ℓ − 1)-dimensional, there OEerefore, since for every a ∈ T : Pa ⊂ Q(a) − Rℓ exists some vector z(a) > 0 such that ❕′(a) + z(a) ∈ Q(a). + is measurable.13 Since the production Without loss of generality, we may assume that z : T → Rℓ correspondence P is integrably bounded from above by Definition 2.2(iii) it follows, therefore, that the mapping z is integrable with z =∫T z(a) dµ(a) > 0. OEen ❕′ dµ ∈ÞS (❕′(a) + z(a) ) dµ(a) +ÞS \T ❕′ dµ + z =ÞT ÞS Q(a) dµ(a) = QS . OEen there exists some integrable selection ❕ : S → Rℓ with ❕(a) ∈ Q(a) such that ÞS ❕ dµ =ÞS ❕′ dµ + z ∈ QS . Now, the coalition S improves upon (f , ❕) through (f ′, ❕). Indeed, ÞS f ′ dµ 6ÞS ❕′ dµ <ÞS ❕′ dµ + z =ÞS ❕ dµ. OEis shows the assertion of the lemma. 12Nonemptiness of QS follows from the integrably boundedness of the correspondence P and, therefore, of Q. OEis implies that all measurable selections in Q are integrable. 13OEis can be shown through an appropriate application of Proposition 3 in Hildenbrand (1974, page 60). 19 From Lemma C.2, we may assume that ∫S ❕′ dµ ∈ QS . OEerefore, there exists some integrable selection ❕′′ : S → Rℓ with ❕′′(a) ∈ Q(a) such that ÞS ❕′′ dµ =ÞS ❕′ dµ. We conclude that S improves upon (f , ❕) through (f ′, ❕′′) : ua (f ′(a)) > ua (f (a)) for all a ∈ S and ÞS f ′ dµ 6ÞS ❕′ dµ =ÞS ❕′′ dµ Hence, (f , ❕) < CS (E), showing the assertion of OEeorem 4.3. 20
1909.01889	1	1909	2019-09-04T15:39:10	Illiquid Financial Markets and Monetary Policy	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper analyzes the role of money in asset markets characterized by search frictions. We develop a dynamic framework that brings together a model for illiquid financial assets `a la Duffie, Garleanu, and Pedersen, and a search-theoretic model of monetary exchange `a la Lagos and Wright. The presence of decentralized financial markets generates an essential role for money, which helps investors re-balance their portfolios. We provide conditions that guarantee the existence of a monetary equilibrium. In this case, asset prices are always above their fundamental value, and this differential represents a liquidity premium. We are able to derive an asset pricing theory that delivers an explicit connection between monetary policy, asset prices, and welfare. We obtain a negative relationship between inflation and equilibrium asset prices. This key result stems from the complementarity between money and assets in our framework.	econ.TH	econ	Illiquid Financial Markets and Monetary Policy∗ Athanasios Geromichalos†, Juan M. Licari‡, Jos´e Su´arez-Lled´o § July, 2011 Abstract This paper analyzes the role of money in markets where financial investment takes place in a decentralized fashion. A key methodological contribution is the development of a dynamic framework that brings together a model for illiquid financial assets `a la Duffie, Garleanu, and Pedersen, and a monetary framework `a la Lagos and Wright. The presence of decentralized financial markets generates an essential role for money in helping investors re-balance their portfolios. From the equilibrium conditions we are able to derive an asset pricing theory that delivers an explicit connection between monetary policy, the different asset prices, and welfare. In contrast to the existing monetary literature, we can sustain welfare gains even with positive inflation rates. Also, we obtain a negative relationship between inflation and asset prices, that are always above their fundamental value. This price differential is associated with a liquidity premium. JEL classification: E44, E52, G11, G12. Keywords: monetary policy, asset pricing, decentralized markets, liquidity. ∗ We are very grateful to Darrell Duffie, Ricardo Lagos, and Randall Wright for their guidance and helpful discussions. We would also like to thank Philipp Kircher, Jan Eeckhout, Aus´ıas Rib´o, and seminar participants at the Summer Workshop on Money, Banking, Payments and Finance at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Search and Matching Workshop at University of Pennsylvania, Universidad P´ublica de Navarra, Universitat Aut´onoma de Barcelona, and Universitat de Barcelona. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grant ECO2009- 09847, the Juan de la Cierva Program, and the Barcelona Graduate School Research Network is gratefully acknowledged. All errors are solely our responsibility. † Department of Economics, UC Davis. Contact: [email protected] ‡ Moody's Analytics. Contact: [email protected] § Departmento de Econom´ıa e Historia Econ´omica. Universidad Aut´onoma de Barcelona. Contact: [email protected] 1 Introduction Over the last two decades secondary financial markets have developed considerably, both in size and complexity. New financial products are generated through processes of securitization by which financial assets are derived from the value of an underlying asset. In their seminal paper Duffie, Garleanu, and Pedersen (2005) document that many of these financial products are traded in markets that are characterized by search frictions. At the same time, since the influential work of Lagos and Wright (2005) monetary search models have been integrated into main-stream macroeconomic theory. Their model analyzes the role of monetary exchange in economies where trade is not centralized through some perfect and frictionless (Walrasian) market. Our paper attempts to bring these two strands of the literature together by study- ing the role that money can play, through liquidity provision, in frictional financial markets. Duffie et al. analyze Over-the-Counter markets where financial assets trade without the use of a liquid asset like fiat money. On the other hand Lagos and Wright (2005) consider a model where money helps overcome certain frictions of decentralized trade. However, agents here trade consumption goods for the liquid asset. Our objec- tive is to bring the framework in Duffie et al. (2005) into a dynamic monetary model where financial markets with frictions may generate a role for money.1 We present a model with a sequence of markets where agents can store a safe-return real asset and later on convert part of it into a risky and illiquid financial investment. The modeling of this risky asset follows Duffie et al.: it yields different idiosyncratic returns and agents can re-balance their portfolios in illiquid (decentralized) markets. A relevant innovative element in our approach is that investors can (and will) use money as a medium of exchange for those transactions. We show that money is not neutral and has an impact on both the volume of trade and the value of assets. Duffie et al. consider the specific trading structure in decentralized financial mar- kets where assets are traded by procedures like bid-ask pricing, bilateral or multi- lateral bargaining, etc. They build a model that rationalizes standard measures of liquidity in these markets such as trade volume, bid-ask spreads, and trading delays. However, investors' ability to re-balance their positions is severely limited by the re- striction that agents can hold either 0 units or 1 unit of the assets. On the other hand, the search-theoretic literature stemming from Lagos and Wright (2005) devel- ops a framework where centralized and decentralized markets interact. We consider this an appropriate setup for analyzing these issues that has not been exploited in our direction. 1 As it is well known, in models that feature Arrow-Debreu type of markets it is very hard to support monetary equilibria other than those where agents are "forced" to hold money, e.g. money in the utility function or cash-in-advance models. 2 Lagos (2011) presents an asset pricing model where equity shares and fiat money can be used as means of payment for consumption, and derives a monetary policy scheme as a function of stochastic equity returns. In this model, however, there is neither collateral nor trading of assets, just exchange of consumption goods for real assets and fiat money. In a paper that more specifically tries to approach Over-the- Counter markets in a less restrictive manner than Duffie et al., Lagos and Rocheteau (2009) develop a framework where investors may wish to adjust their asset positions after a shock to preferences that affect their asset demand. They may do so contacting financial intermediaries that charge a fee. The authors try to explain the above mentioned dimensions of liquidity in these markets. In a more recent paper, and within a very similar setup, Lagos, Rocheteau, and Weill (2011) take a step further and consider crises and recoveries in these markets. They define a crisis as a negative shock to investors' asset demand that will recover at a random time. Liquidity can be provided by dealers, since they accumulate asset inventories. In the cases where it is not optimal for the dealers to accumulate assets, the government can step in and provide liquidity instead. Nevertheless, these models have neither fiat money nor assets serving as collateral, and therefore their notions of liquidity differ somehow from the standard ones. Ferraris and Watanabe (2011) model capital accumulation that will serve as collateral, and discuss the effects of fluctuations in the liquidation value of collateral on the economy's allocation and its interaction with monetary policy. As it turns out, however, we find that no relevant paper in this field has yet tried to formally approach the integration of money in illiquid financial markets. Thus, we want to build a model that fills the gap between the finance and mone- tary literature. Our main contribution is the development of a framework that allows us to derive an asset pricing theory that delivers an explicit connection between mon- etary policy, the different asset prices, and welfare. We find that the value generated in these markets is affected by monetary policy, and the equilibrium price of the un- derlying asset is always above its fundamental value. In particular, two of our results stand in contrast to those in most of the search literature. First, under certain pa- rameterizations welfare gains can be sustained even by positive inflation rates. In the related literature the optimal policy usually depicts deflationary money growth rates. Second, our pricing equations reveal that the monetary policy instrument and the price of the underlying asset are negatively correlated. The reason is that money and the asset are complements in our model, as opposed to a majority of the literature where they are substitutes. This aspect is further elaborated by Ferraris (2010) and Geromichalos, Licari, and Su´arez-Lled´o (2007). We shall later discuss our results in more detail. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In sections 2 and 3 we present the main features of the model and describe the market structures that will allow us to study the role of the different assets, which is derived from the optimal behavior of 3 each type of agent. In section 4 we proceed to analyze the existence of a monetary equilibrium as well as the nature of asset prices and the welfare consequences of inflation. Section 5 contains the main conclusions. In an Appendix we also consider two alternative pricing protocols in the decentralized market to test the robustness of the results. 2 The Model The environment that we analyze takes the framework presented in Lagos and Wright (2005), henceforth LW, as a starting point. Time is discrete and there is a [0, 1] con- tinuum of agents that live forever and discount future at rate β ∈ (0, 1). There are three assets in the model: a real asset that yields a deterministic return, R, at the end of every period, a risky financial asset, and an intrinsically worthless object that we call money. In every period agents engage in different activities in three markets that open sequentially. At the beginning of a period, t, agents enter an investment market (IM) with a certain amount of the real asset, at, and money holdings, mt, that they have previously stored. In this first market agents can decide how much of the safe asset to transform into a risky financial asset, st ∈ [0, at], thus giving up any claim on the safe real return by the issued amount. Instead, investing in this new asset will yield a high return, yH , or a low return, yL, at the end of the period with equal probability. Furthermore, in order to make the analysis more interesting we are going to assume that 0 ≤ yL < yH , and that yH > R. Following Duffie et al., we model idiosyncratic returns such that depending on the type of investor I turn out to be I will obtain different return. However, this idiosyncratic uncertainty will only be resolved right after the investment decisions have been made and before entering a decentralized financial market (DFM). These returns are i.i.d. distributed across periods and agents. In the second market, having learned their types, agents can readjust their portfo- lios by re-balancing their holdings of the risky asset. This process happens in bilateral meetings where agents' types are public info. In particular, gains from this decentral- ized trade are generated `a la Berentsen and Rocheteau (2003) from low-return agents wanting to sell their investment assets to high-return agents. Anonymity, in the sense that trading histories are not known among agents, is still present in this environment. Also, there is imperfect enforcement and a double coincidence problem.2 These are some of the main elements that render money essential in this type of framework, as discussed in Kocherlakota (1998). In particular, we will show that money will allow to reallocate otherwise inefficient investment allocations. 2 Only agents of different types will be willing to trade their risky assets: high types want to take on larger investment amounts in assets that will give them higher returns than the safe asset; and low types may want to get ride of low-yield investment. 4 Finally, after the investment and the decentralized financial market everyone en- ters a centralized market (CM) with their new holdings of the risky asset, the safe asset, and money. At this last stage agents will choose how much of the safe real asset and money they will carry onto the next period. They also derive net utility, U (Xt) − Ht, from consuming an amount of a general good, Xt, and from supplying an amount of labor, Ht. Notice that this is the only market in which agents consume and work. Utility, U (Xt). is assumed to be twice continuously differentiable with U ′ > 0, U ′′ ≤ 0. We also assume there exists X ∗ such that U ′(X ∗) = 1, with U ′(X ∗) > X ∗. At this stage, agents can acquire any quantity of money, mt, and the real asset, at, for the next period at prices φ and ψ, respectively. The supply of this asset is fixed, A, and each unit yields dividend, R, in the last market of the next period. Money supply is controlled by a monetary authority and it evolves according to Mt = (1 + µ)Mt. This paper departs from LW and other related papers in two fundamental aspects that will be discussed in detail below: one is the introduction of an investment market for securitization, and the other relates to how we model decentralized financial trade. As we mentioned in the introduction, this departure will generate very interesting re- sults, also regarding monetary policy. Some stand in contrast to those in related papers. Finally, it is an important issue in the literature that deals with decentral- ized trade, and particularly in the money-search literature, how different bargaining protocols may determine the terms of trade. A broad discussion on this is provided by Rocheteau and Wright (2005). In our paper we consider both price taking and bargaining.3 However, the structure that we endow decentralized trade with turns out specially relevant. Indeed, we find that Arrow-Debreu equilibria where the price of the real asset deviates from its fundamental value can only be supported under price taking. Therefore, event though the bargaining version has some interesting aspects, we relegate its analysis and the justification of this result to the Appendix. In order to save notation, we drop the time subscripts from now on whenever it does not lead to confusion. 3 Optimal Behavior 3.1 Centralized Market In order to derive a more clear intuition of the mechanism of the model, and for convenience of analysis, we proceed to solve the model backwards, starting from the third sub-period, a Walrasian centralized market. The value function of entering the 3 Price taking can be regarded as the monetary version of Lucas and Prescott (1974). 5 CM with money holdings m, real asset holdings b, and financial investment s is V 3j(m, b, s) = max s.t. φ m + ψa + X = H + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yj )s, m,a,X,H(cid:8)U (X) − H + βV 1( m, a)(cid:9) where j = L, H, and b = a − s, with a being the amount of the real asset brought from the previous period. Three observations are immediate. First, in every period X = X ∗ and we can write V 3j(m, b, s) = U (X ∗) − X ∗ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yj )s + max m,a (cid:8)−φ m − ψa + βV 1( m, a)(cid:9) . Second, V 3j is linear in all its arguments, V 3j(m, b, s) = Λ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yj )s, (1) (2) where the definition of Λ is obvious. Finally, it is easy to see from (1) that there are not any wealth effects: the agent's choices of m, a do not depend on today's states m, a. This is a consequence of quasi-linearity of preferences. Although we will discuss the solution to the optimization problem above later, we lay out here the first order conditions for m and a, −φ + βV 1 −ψ + βV 1 m( m, a) ≤ 0 a ( m, a) ≤ 0 (= 0, if m > 0), (= 0, if a > 0), (3) (4) where V 1 expression (2) the envelope conditions would be i stands for the partial derivative of V 1 with respect to its argument i. From m = φm; V 3j V 3j b = ψ + R; V 3j s = ψ + yj. The first order conditions refer to the fact that the cost of carrying the assets across periods must not be negative. Otherwise agents would want to accumulate unbounded amounts of money and the real asset. In a pure Arrow-Debreu world the equilibrium condition for the real asset would imply its price just reflecting the discounted flow of returns. In our model its price will reflect the discounted marginal value of carrying the asset into the next period, which will differ from its fundamental value. 3.2 Decentralized Financial Market A large percentage of the financial sector is composed of markets for less liquid assets that are more difficult to trade in regular centralized markets. Trade is carried out 6 in more decentralized procedures in these markets. Over-the-Counter markets are a especially relevant example (Duffie et al. (2005), Lagos et al. (2010)). However, it is also the case that in many of these markets agents do not usually bargain. Instead, they feature some type of price taking protocol (bid-ask pricing). Following the logic of these type of markets, we model here the exchange of a risky financial asset, s, that is less liquid than a standard real asset, a, commonly traded in a centralized Walrasian market. We also consider a price taking mechanism that resembles those in the kind of markets we are interested in. When agents enter our DFM they know what return they will obtain for their investment in the risky asset, and they are now allowed to re-balance their positions on this investment by trading the risky asset. Since 0 < yL < yH , L-types will naturally arise as the sellers of s, while the H-types will naturally become the buyers.4 Let p be the dollar price of one unit of investment. Conditional on being an L-type, and hence a seller, an agent who carries an amount s solves the following problem5 max qs≤s V 3L (m + pqs, b, s − qs) or alternatively max qs≤s {Λ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yL)s + (φp − ψ − yL)qs} , where qs is the supply of securities. The seller's optimal behavior yields the individual supply function 0, if p < ψ+yL φ ∈ [0, s], if p = ψ+yL φ . s, if p > , ψ+yL φ , q∗ s =  In short, L-types will not sell if the price is low, they will be indifferent if the price falls in a medium range, and would want to sell everything if the price exceeds the value of the asset. Interestingly, notice that since the price of s is in nominal terms and that of the real asset is in real terms, inflation will have something to say here. Sellers compare p to the nominal value of ψ + yL by dividing it by φ. Therefore, as 4 In principle it makes sense that L-types want to get rid of a bad asset, while H-types want to purchase more of an asset on which they can get a high return. As will be shown, the amount of money exchanged in this market will be either such that L-types are at least indifferent, which will make trade profitable for H-types, or such that H-types are indifferent, in which case trade will be profitable for L-types. Therefore, the natural arrangement in this market is actually always implemented in any equilibrium. 5 Given the competitive nature of this market, the only variables that matter for the seller's problem are s and the price (that she takes as given). Similarly, in the buyer's problem below the relevant variables are m, p. 7 the real value of money, φ, increases it is more likely that p > (ψ + yL)/φ and they will want to sell everything. Conversely, as inflation is higher, φ → 0, sellers decrease their supply, qs → 0. Conditional on being an H-type, an agent solves max qb≤m/p V 3H (m − pqb, b, s + qb) or alternatively max qb≤m/p {Λ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yH )s + (ψ + yH − φp)qb} . where qb is the demand of securities. The demand function is given by 0, if p > ψ+yH φ , ∈ [0, m/p], if p = ψ+yH m/p, if p < φ ψ+yH φ , . q∗ b =  The interpretation for buyers is the opposite as that for sellers, and inflation also plays a role; as φ → 0, buyers increase their demand, qb → m/p. Figure 1 depicts the aggregate demand and supply curves. The equilibrium price and the quantity of s that is traded depend on the shape of the demand curve. In particular, inspection of the demand and supply functions shows that equilibrium depends on the distribution of the returns on the financial asset. If φm < (ψ + yL)s (represented by D1 in Figure 1), we have Q∗ = (λ/2)(φm)/(ψ + yL). If φm ≥ (ψ + yL)s (represented by D2 in Figure 1), we have Q∗ = λs/2. Therefore, Q∗ = (λ/2) min {s, (φm)/(ψ + yL)}. The parameter λ is the probability of going into the DFM. It can be seen as the degree of access to decentralized financial markets. Thus, this parameter can also be interpreted as a measure of the liquidity of these markets. The equilibrium quantity of s that a representative agent (H-type) acquires in the DFM is then and the equilibrium price is given by q∗ = min(cid:26)s, φm ψ + yL(cid:27) , (5) (6) ψ+yL φ , if φm < (ψ + yL)s, m s , if φm ∈ [(ψ + yL)s, (ψ + yH )s], ψ+yH , ifφm > (ψ + yH )s . φ p∗ =  Interestingly enough, the equilibrium in this market depends on real money balances, φm. Portfolio re-balancing generates a role for money and takes place at the equilib- rium price, p∗, which depends on inflation through φ. Moreover, it is key to notice from equation (5) that trade in this market exists, q∗ > 0, if and only if φm > 0. Therefore, the relationship between monetary equilibrium and financial trade is one- to-one. 8 3.3 Investment Market At the beginning of every period, agents enter a financial market with holdings of money and real asset from previous period. Thus, the vector of state variables is (m, a), and the agent wishes to maximize her continuation value in the DFM by choosing optimally what part of a to invest in the risky asset. Therefore, an agent that enters the IM with portfolio (m, a) has a value function6 V 1(m, a) = max s∈[0,a](cid:26) 1 2(cid:2)V 2L (m, b, s) + V 2H (m, b, s)(cid:3)(cid:27) . (7) In order to examine the optimal choice of s for the agent, we need to replace the value functions V 2j with more useful expressions. To that end notice that V 2L (m, b, s) = λV 3L (m + pqs, b, s − qs) + (1 − λ)V 3L (m, b, s) , V 2H (m, b, s) = λV 3H (m − pqs, b, s + qs) + (1 − λ)V 3H (m, b, s) . Equivalently, using the results derived above regarding the terms of trade in the DFM we can write V 2L (m, b, s) = λV 3L (m + p∗q∗, b, s − q∗) + (1 − λ)V 3L (m, b, s) , V 2H (m, b, s) = λV 3H (m − p∗q∗, b, s + q∗) + (1 − λ)V 3H (m, b, s) . Then, exploiting the linearity of V 3j, equation (2), and using (5), we obtain 1 2(cid:2)V 2L (m, b, s) + V 2H (m, b, s)(cid:3) = Λ + φm + (ψ + R)a + +(cid:20)1 ψ + yL(cid:27) . (yL + yH ) − R(cid:21) s + (yH − yL) min(cid:26)s, φm λ 2 2 (8) Inserting (8) into (7), we can rewrite the objective function as maxs∈[0,a]n(cid:2) 1 2 (yL + yH ) − R(cid:3) s + λ ≡ maxs∈[0,a]nα1s + α2 min {s, α3}o. 2 (yH − yL) minns, φm ψ+yLoo ≡ The definitions of the terms αi, i = 1, 2, 3, are obvious and are adopted for analytical convenience. The objective function of the agent is very intuitive. The first term, 1 2 (yL + yH ) − R, represents that for every unit of a that she turns into s, she forgoes the return R, and gains yL or yH with equal probability. The second term of the objective is the expected gain from trade in the DFM, which is equal to the total 6 Since b = a − s it does not matter whether the agent chooses s or b. 9 number of units of s that trade in the DFM multiplied by the average gain from this transaction. For every unit of s that goes from the hands of an L-type to those of an H-type, a surplus equal to yH − yL is generated. Consider now the optimal choice of s, namely, s∗. In order to focus on the more interesting situations we want to consider the case where the expected return from the risky investment is less than the return on the safe asset, i.e. we assume that α1 ≡ (1/2) (yL + yH ) − R ≤ 0. This means that if agents were not able to trade s in the DFM, they would never choose s∗ > 0.7 The objective of the agent is depicted in Figure 2 for various parameter values. The key variable for the determination of s∗ is α1 + α2 = (1/2)[(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] − R. This term is the multiplier of s for s ≤ α3. When the financial market is fairly liquid, λ big, more weight is put on yH and α1 + α2 is also big. If financial markets are illiquid, λ = 0, the agent never gets to trade into the DFM; the gain from holding s coincides with the net return of the risky asset, which is assumed to be non-positive. If λ = 1, α1 + α2 = yH − R > 0. The following Lemma summarizes the optimal investment policy. Lemma 1. For a given state (m, a), the optimal choice of s ∈ [0, a] is given by 0, if α1 + α2 < 0, ∈ [0, min{α3, a}] , if α1 + α2 = 0, min{α3, a}, if α1 + α2 > 0 and α1 < 0, ∈ [min{α3, a}, a] , if α1 + α2 > 0 and α1 = 0. (9) s∗ =  Proof. The result follows from inspection of the objective function and Figure 2. The following lemma will be useful in later analysis and expresses that the net gain of carrying assets across periods is non-positive. The interpretation behind this is that agents will only be willing to carry assets, money and real asset, if there are positive gains from re-balancing their investment positions in the DFM. Indeed, we show below that one of the main contributions of the model is that the value generated by this mechanism is reflected in the asset pricing equation. Should this gain not exist, only the fundamental value of the asset would be reflected by its price, i.e. the discounted flow of expected returns. Lemma 2. In any equilibrium ψ ≥ β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17) , φ ≥ β φ. 7 Alternatively, the assumption that α1 ≤ 0 shows the robustness of the results in our model: if agents choose s∗ > 0 when the net return (excluding the potential gains in the DFM) of the risky asset is non-positive, then they will definitely do so if α1 were positive. 10 Proof. This is a standard result in the literature and its proof is omitted. For details see for example Geromichalos, Licari, and Su´arez-Lled´o (2007). Having characterized the optimal choice of s we can proceed to analyze the choice of m, a by examining the value function V 3j. This choice will crucially depend on the parameter values. Once again the key determinant is the term α1 + α2. Case 1: α1 + α2 < 0. We know that in the next period the agent will choose to not invest anything in the risky asset, i.e. s∗ = 0 and q∗ = 0. Hence, we can write8 V 3j(m, b, s) = U (X ∗) − X ∗ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yj )s + max m,a (cid:26)−φ m − ψa + β 2 (cid:2)V 2L( m + µM, a, 0) + V 2H( m + µM, a, 0)(cid:3)(cid:27) = m,a n−φ m − ψa + βhΛ + φ( m + µM ) + (R + ψ)a = Ω1 + max + λ 2 φ( m + µM ) ψ + yL )#) = (yH − yL) min(0, m,a n−(cid:16)φ − β φ(cid:17) m −hψ − β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17)i ao , = Ω2 + max where the first equality follows from (8) and the definition of q∗. The terms Ω1, Ω2, and Λ do not depend on m, a, and their definitions are obvious.9 Recall from Lemma 2 that the multipliers of both m and a above are non positive. Hence, it is easy to see that the optimal choices of these variables satisfy a∗ =  0, if ψ > β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17) , ∈ ℜ+, if ψ = β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17) . (10) m∗ =(cid:26) 0, if φ > β φ, ∈ ℜ+, if φ = β φ, We will return to describe equilibrium in this case. Before that, we complete our description of the optimal choice of m, a. Case 2: α1 + α2 ≥ 0. Here s∗ = min {a, α3}, where α3 = φ ( m + µM ) /(cid:16) ψ + yL(cid:17).10 8 Since s∗ = 0, we have b = a. Also, the money holdings in the next period of an agent that chooses m in the current period's CM are given by m + µM . 9 In particular, Λ is the term we get if we lead Λ, defined in (2), by one period. Since Λ is independent of m, a, Λ is independent of m, a. 10 As opposed to α3, the terms α1, α2 are constant. Moreover, from Lemma 1 it follows that s∗ = min {a, α3} is always an optimal choice in the forthcoming period, although not the only 11 Following the same strategy as above, we write V 3j(m, b, s) = U (X ∗) − X ∗ + φm + (ψ + R)b + (ψ + yj )s + max m,a n − φ m − ψa + β 2 (cid:2)V 2L( m + µM, a − min {a, α3} , min {a, α3}) +V 2H ( m + µM, a − min {a, α3} , min {a, α3})(cid:3)o = m,a n−φ m − ψa + βh Λ + φ m +(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17) (a − min {a, α3}) +(cid:18) ψ + (yH − yL) q∗(cid:21)(cid:27) . (cid:19) min {a, α3} + yH + yL λ 2 2 = Ω1 + max From (5), the quantity of s that changes hands in the DFM is given by q∗ = min(s∗, φ ( m + µM ) ψ + yL ) = min(min {a, α3} , ψ + yL ) = min(a, φ ( m + µM ) ψ + yL ) , φ ( m + µM ) ψ + yL ) = ψ + yL ) . φ ( m + µM ) φ ( m + µM ) = min(min(a, Using this fact to rewrite the the value function V 3j, we conclude that the objective of the agent is to max m,a n−(cid:16)φ − β φ(cid:17) m −hψ − β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17)i a [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL − 2R] min(a, φ ( m + µM ) ψ + yL )) ≡ + β 2 ≡ max m,a {−γ1 m − γ2a + γ3 min {a, γ4 m + γ5}} . The definitions of the terms γi, i = 1, .., 5 is obvious and greatly simplifies the notation. Notice that γ1, γ2 ≥ 0. Also, γ3 = β(α1 + α2) ≥ 0. Finally, γ4 > 0 and the sign of γ5 depends on whether the monetary authority is running inflation or deflation, i.e. the sign of µ. The objective function is linear in m, a. The optimal solution depends on the magnitude of the various gamma's. Considering that both arguments in the min function depend on decision variables of the agent, the optimal choice will have both arguments being equal to each other. Thus, it is relatively easy one. This choice is the unique optimal, only if α1 + α2 > 0 and α1 < 0. Nevertheless, plugging s∗ = min {a, α3} into the value function V 3j is always a good idea, since it yields the same result as any other s∗. 12 to verify that11 ( m∗, a∗) =  (0, 0), if γ1 + γ2γ4 > γ3γ4, (+∞, +∞), if γ1 + γ2γ4 < γ3γ4, (z, γ4z + γ5), for any z ≥ − γ5 γ4 , if γ1 + γ2γ4 = γ3γ4. (11) 4 Equilibrium We now proceed to the definition and the analysis of equilibrium. Definition 1. An equilibrium for this economy is a set of value functions V ij, i = 1, 2, 3 and j = L, H that satisfy the Bellman equations, a triplet (p∗, q∗, s∗) that satisfy (5), (6), and (9) in every period, and a pair of bounded sequences {φtMt}∞ t=0, such that the agent behaves optimally under the conditions at = A and mt = Mt, all t. t=0,{ψt}∞ Consider first Case 1, i.e. α1 + α2 < 0. From (10), a necessary condition for equilibrium is ψ = β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17), which implies that the sequence of the asset price should follow the difference equation ψt+1 = −R + (1/β)ψt. Since β < 1, this can only be true if ψt = ¯ψ = βR 1 − β . (12) The asset price given by (12) is the fundamental value of the asset, i.e. the discounted stream of future dividends. The result according to which ψt = ¯ψ, reflects the fact that in the case under consideration the asset is only valued for the fruit it yields: agents never buy it in order to invest in the risky asset and possibly trade in the DFM. The role of money in this economy is not essential. Agents have a positive demand for money only if φ = β φ. In steady state this implies that µ = 1−β, i.e the monetary authority is following the Friedman rule.12 Agents carry money only when the cost of doing so is zero (equivalently, when the nominal interest rate is zero). Of course, they never get to use that money in the DFM, since s∗ = 0 and there is nothing to trade money with. The more interesting case is therefore α1 + α2 ≥ 0. For the rest of this paper 11 In the third line, the condition z ≥ −γ5/γ4 just guarantees that if µ < 0 the optimal choice of a satisfies non-negativity. 12 In steady state φM = φ M ⇒ φM = φ(1 + µ)M . Therefore, 1 + µ = φ/ φ = β. 13 we assume that this condition holds. Optimality (described by (11)) reveals that a necessary condition for the existence of equilibrium is γ1 + γ2γ4 = γ3γ4 ⇔ φ − β φ +hψ − β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17)i φ ψ+yL = β(α1 + α2) φ ψ+yL . (13) As we pointed in the definition above, we focus on steady state equilibria. That is, equilibria in which money balances and asset prices are constant in every period. However, in the appendix we show that bubbles, i.e. equilibria in which the asset price is above the market price for some periods, can never arise in this environment. To simplify equation (13), divide both sides by φ and recall that at the steady state φ/ φ = 1 + µ. We obtain (1 + µ − β)(cid:16) ψ + yL(cid:17) = −ψ + β(cid:16)R + ψ(cid:17) + β(α1 + α2). Using the definition of α1 + α2 and solving with respect to ψ yields the asset pricing difference equation followed, ψ = β 2 [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] − (1 + µ − β)yL 1 + µ − 2β − 1 1 + µ − 2β ψ. (14) As we explained, we drive our attention to the case in which ψ = ψ = ψ∗.13 Using this in (14) and solving with respect to ψ∗ we obtain ψ∗ = β 2 [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] − (1 + µ − β)yL 2(1 − β) + µ . (15) It immediately follows from this equation that the price of the asset depends negatively on the growth rate of money. This result is in contrast with the predictions of related papers, like Geromichalos et al (2007) or Lester, Postlewaite, and Wright (2007). In these papers agents bring money and real assets with them in the DFM in order to buy a specialized good. Higher inflation makes carrying money more costly, and so people turn to the relatively cheaper asset, thus increasing its price. Unlike these papers, here money and the asset are complements, in the sense that agents need both objects in order to trade in the DFM.14 If money is costly to carry, the demand 13 The returns yH and yL are deterministic and with probability 0.5. Therefore the only randomness comes from the idiosyncratic realizations of those returns. The probability of going to the DFM, λ, is also constant. Therefore, the intuition behind this is that the gain from decentralized trade is also always going to be the same, so it makes sense that the price of the asset is constant every period as well. More extensive discussion is provided later. 14 More precisely, agents trade m for s in the DFM, but in order to be in possession of some s, agents need to bring some a from the previous period. To see why m and s are complements consider the extreme case in which all agents bring a billion dollars but s∗ = 0. The surplus generated in the DFM is still zero. 14 for the asset will decrease and so will its equilibrium price (given fixed supply). A second observation that follows from (15) is that the price of the asset is always higher than the fundamental value given by (12). In the Appendix we show that this result is true as long as λ > 0. Moreover, since the asset price is decreasing in the money growth rate, it obtains its maximum value when µ = β − 1. The resulting expression is given by ψmax = β 1 − β 1 2 [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] ≥ β 1 − β R, where the inequality follows from the fact that α1 + α2 ≥ 0. Again, unless λ = 0, the asset price is strictly greater than its fundamental value. Furthermore, since the price, ψ∗, can never be smaller than βR/(1 − β) because this would violate Lemma 2, the upper bound of admissible monetary policies can be uniquely defined by ¯µ ≡ {µ : ψ∗(µ) = βR/(1 − β)}. A characterization of ¯µ is provided in the Appendix where we also show that equilibria with positive inflation, ¯µ > 0, can be supported depending on the distribution of idiosyncratic shocks. The asset pricing equation in this model reflects two dimensions. First, the asset is valued for the dividend it yields, R. Second the asset is also valued for its property to be transformed into s, thus allowing agents to generate additional value by re- balancing their portfolios in the DFM. Since access to the DFM is granted with probability λ, the difference expressed by ψ∗ − βR/(1 − β) reflects the premium of the asset over the fundamental value. In particular, this premium is largest at the Friedman rule, in which case the term α1 + α2 ≡ (1/2) [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] − R would represent the spread. Notice, however, that in general such premium depends on the money growth rate, µ. Then, we consider it appropriate to refer to it as a liquidity premium. After all, additional value in this economy is generated by the degree of "liquidity" in the DFM. That is, value is generated along with the easiness to reallocate portfolios in the DFM, and this ultimately depends on the value of money. 4.1 Welfare In most other related models welfare is measured in a standard manner by two terms: the excess utility over the cost of producing the general consumption good in the cen- tralized market, U (X) − X, and the excess utility of the total amount of consumption in the decentralized market over the cost of producing that total amount. However, in our economy there is no consumption good being traded in the decentralized market. Instead, the amount of assets traded in the DFM affects the budget constraint in the CM. Therefore, the way we measure welfare in this economy is by computing the total value of trade in the DFM in terms of the CM. Given that α1 + α2 > 0, in the IM agents place all their asset holdings into the 15 risky investment, s∗ = A. In the DFM the amount of assets that change hands is given by Q∗ = (λ/2) min {A, φM/(ψ + yL)} = (λ/2)A.15 This means that L-types sell all their assets to H-types, which is efficient from a social point of view, and in return they receive p∗Q∗ = λA(ψ∗ + yL)/(2φ∗). The latter accounts for the total value of trade in the DFM. One result that is as stricking as important is that total welfare is unaffected by inflation as long as µ ∈ [β − 1, ¯µ]. This result implies, in contrast to other monetary models, that welfare gains can be sustained even by positive rates of inflation.16 If µ > ¯µ carrying money becomes too expensive and the monetary equi- librium collapses, together with any trade in the DFM. A first best is achieved when λ = 1 because decentralized trade (and, therefore, optimal re-alocation of resources) is maximized. The following proposition summarizes the most important results. Proposition 1. The key variable for the determination of equilibrium is α1 + α2, which can be interpreted as the net return of the risky asset. (a) If α1 + α2 ≤ 0 no trade exists in the DFM, q∗ = s∗ = 0, and the asset is only valued for the dividend it yields, i.e. ψ∗ = βR/(1 − β). There is no essential role for money in this economy. Its real allocation coincides with that of an Arrow-Debreu economy and asset pricing follows the Lucas formula. A monetary equilibrium could only be supported by the Friedman rule. (b) If α1 + α2 > 0, ψt = ψ∗(µ) given by (15) for all t. The range of policies under which monetary equilibria can be supported is [β − 1, ¯µ], where ¯µ is defined by ¯µ ≡ {µ : ψ∗(µ) = βR/(1 − β)}. For all µ in this range, dψ∗/dµ < 0. The bigger the λ, the bigger the premium between the actual value and the fundamental value of the asset. This liquidity premium is maximized at the Friedman rule. These results are presented in Figure 3. Equilibrium welfare depends on λ, i.e. the probability with which agents get to trade in the DFM and re-balance their positions. In the DFM L-types sell all their risky assets to H-types, hence all equilibria are (constrained) efficient. The First Best is achieved when λ = 1. If the decentralized financial market can generate value (α1 + α2 > 0), then monetary equilibria, φm > 0, exist and can be supported by monetary policies ranging from the Friedman rule to potentially positive inflation rates. Risky investments take place 15 Remember that in any equilibrium with positive and finite money and asset holdings, these variables are chosen so that the two arguments in the min function are the same. 16 This result is closely connected to the nature of the returns to the risky asset. In an alternative specification of this model, we consider the case in which investing s ∈ [0, a] units of the asset yields ǫjf (s), where j = L, H and f is a strictly increasing and concave function with standard Inada conditions. Because lims→0f ′(s) = ∞, it is never optimal for the L-type to give up all her assets. This creates a link between inflation and the amount of s that changes hands in the DFM. However, the analysis becomes very complex and we are only able to solve the model numerically. Since none of the major results of the model are altered, we prefer the more simple specification presented here, which yields closed form solutions and clear intuition. 16 even if their expected return is worse than that of safe investments. Agents access the financial market to re-balance their portfolios so that investors with low returns sell transfer all their security holdings, q∗ = s∗ = A, in exchange for p∗ units of money. Thus, money plays an essential role as a medium of exchange in frictional financial markets. In particular, the price at which securities are traded, p∗, not only is related to the price of the real asset, but will also depend negatively on the money growth rate, µ. The quantity exchanged, s∗, is independent of monetary considerations. More interestingly, the price of the real asset, ψ∗ = ψ(µ), is always above its fundamental value and exhibits a liquidity premium that depends crucially on two notions of liq- uidity. On one side, the degree of access to decentralized financial markets, λ. And on the other side, the degree of liquidity within the financial markets, which depends on money supply, µ. The liquidity premium of the real asset, and therefore its value, is maximized at the lowest feasible inflation rate. Positive money growth rate could also generate welfare gains. 5 Conclusion Certain types of markets have quickly developed to attain an enormous size within the financial sector. They have also recently proven to have a considerable impact. Their structure deviates from the standard centralization of primary markets that is embed- ded in most macroeconomic models. Markets for securitization and Over-the-Counter markets stand as a reference of these type of markets. In this context a concern arises naturally: does monetary policy have something to say in these environments? We have presented a general equilibrium model that analyzes the role of money in decentralized financial markets. We provided an innovative framework that models a risky financial asset that can be issued from the value of a safe-return real asset. Agents can re-balance their positions on these relatively illiquid assets with a more liquid instrument (fiat money) in a decentralized financial market. We show that value can be generated from this transfer of assets, and therefore welfare can be increased, by reallocating otherwise inefficient investment. Our new approach yields very interesting results, some in contrast with the exist- ing literature. On the one hand, monetary policy affects the price of the real and the financial asset, attaining their maximum values at a policy equivalent to the Friedman rule. In particular, since money and the real asset are complements, its price is nega- tively correlated with inflation. On the other hand, monetary policy then influences the value generated for the economy in the decentralized market. In fact, policy can always sustain asset prices above their fundamental values and generate welfare gains even under inflationary money growth rates, as long as those rates are not too large. 17 References [1] Berentsen, A. and G. Rocheteau, 2003. Money and the Gains from Trade. Inter- national Economic Review 44 (1), 263-297. [2] Duffie, D., Garleanu, N., and L.H. Pedersen, 2005. Over-the-Counter Markets. Econometrica 73, 1815-1847. [3] Ferraris, L., 2010. On the Complementarity of Money and Credit. European Economic Review 54 (5), 733-741. [4] Ferraris, L. and M. Watanabe, 2011. Collateral Fluctuations in a Monetary Econ- omy. Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming. [5] Geromichalos, A., Licari, J.M., and J. Su´arez-Lled´o, 2007. Monetary Policy and Asset Prices. Review of Economic Dynamics 10, no. 4, 761-779. [6] Kocherlakota, N., 1998. Money is Memory. Journal of Economic Theory 81, 232- 251. [7] Lagos, R., 2011. Asset Prices, Liquidity, and Monetary Policy in an Exchange Economy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, forthcoming. [8] Lagos, R. and G. Rocheteau, 2009. Liquidity in Asset Markets with Search Fric- tions. Econometrica 73 (2), 403-426. [9] Lagos, R., Rocheteau, G., and P.O. Weill, 2011. Crises and Liquidity in Over- the-Counter Markets. Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming. [10] Lagos, R. and R. Wright, 2005. A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 113, no. 3. [11] Rocheteau, G. and R. Wright, 2005. Money in Search Equilibrium, in Competitive Equilibrium, and in Competitive Search Equilibrium. Econometrica 73, 175-202. A Appendix Non-steady state equilibria. We prove here that equilibria other than the steady state described above, cannot arise in this model. More precisely, we cannot have sequences {φtMt}∞ t=0 that converge to a certain limit either monotonically or in an oscillating manner. Therefore, the only way to keep these sequences bounded is to have φtMt and ψt constant in all periods (in order to make this statement one needs to exclude cycles, which is the t=0,{ψt}∞ 18 case here). As part of an equilibrium, we are looking for bounded sequences of money balances and asset prices such that (13) holds and also φtMt = (ψt + yL)A, ∀t. (16) Define real balances as z ≡ φM . If we multiply (13) by M and use (16) to substitute for φ/( ψ + yL) and ψ, we conclude that real money balances follow a first-order linear difference equation, z = − β (α1 + α2 + R) + (1 − β)yL 2β A + 2 + µ 2β z. However, µ ≥ β −1 always, which implies for the multiplier of z that (2+µ)/(2β) > 1. Therefore, the sequence {φtMt}∞ t=0 will always be explosive, unless (φM )t = (φM )∗ for all t. Since (16) has to hold in every period the same conclusion is true for {ψt}∞ t=0. Optimal monetary policy range. In the section on equilibrium with the price taking version we discussed the feasible range for optimal monetary policies. Here we provide a more detailed characterization of the upper bound of that range. The whole point of the price taking version is that it supports asset prices higher than the fundamental value, and such price is decreasing in the money growth rate. Therefore, the upper bound for monetary policy is the money growth rate that makes the price of the real asset equal to its fundamental value, ¯µ ≡ {µ : ψ∗(µ) = βR/(1 − β)}. If we take the equation for the equilibrium price of the asset, (15), and make it equal to its fundamental value, we can solve for the money growth rate, ¯µb. Thus, we write ψ∗ = β 2 [(1 + λ)yH + (1 − λ)yL] − (1 − µ − β)yL 2(1 − β) + µ = βR 1 − β . After some algebra one arrives at the following expression ¯µb = β − 1 + β(1 − β)(α1 + α2) yL(1 − β) + βR . which will be positive as long as α1 + α2 > 1−β β yL + R > 0. Bargaining in the DFM. We present here the complete analysis of the version of the model with bargaining in the DFM. We consider agents bilaterally trading in this market according to a Nash bargaining procedure. It can be easily shown that in any meeting between two agents of the same type no trade will occur. Thus, we focus here on bilateral meetings of agents of different type. In this matches the portfolio of a low type agent is (m, b, s) 19 and that of a high type agents is ( ¯m, ¯b, ¯s). Thus, agents must choose the amount of money, dm, and securities, ds, exchanged in order to max dm,ds s.t. (cid:2)V 3L(m + dm, b, s − ds) − V 3L(m, b, s)(cid:3)θ ×(cid:2)V 3H ( ¯m − dm, ¯b, ¯s + ds) − V 3H ( ¯m, ¯b, ¯s)(cid:3)1−θ −m ≤ dm ≤ ¯m; − ¯s ≤ ds ≤ s × In other words, agents maximize the value of trade. In principle, we formulate the problem in the most general way that allows either agent to sell or buy securities. However, in the equilibrium delivered by this version, in which returns on the risky asset are linear in the amount of the asset, H-types will always be the buyers and L-types the sellers. Now, using the linearity of the value function, we can rewrite the bargaining problem as max dm,ds s.t. [φdm − (ψ + yL)ds]θ [−φdm + (ψ + yH )ds)]1−θ (17) −m ≤ dm ≤ ¯m; − ¯s ≤ ds ≤ s Before proceeding with any further analysis, it is absolutely critical to realize that the problem we pose here is completely different from most other bargaining problems in the mainstream literature on money search, at least in those models derived from LW. The key aspect is the following. In those papers the welfare pie in the DFM is given by u(q) − c(q), where q is the consumption of the good in that market, and u(q), c(q) are the utility and cost derived from it. Whereas in our model the size of the pie is not pre-determined. In fact, it depends on the size of the portfolio that the parties carry with them. Therefore, the problem we propose here can only be solved by imposing constraints, otherwise the agents would optimally choose dm = ds = +∞.17 Thus, the optimal solution to our problem features one of the constraints above binding in equilibrium. We will proceed case by case and then summarize the results. Suppose first that dm = ¯m and ds ≤ s. The problem has a unique interior solution determined by the FOC for ds: which yields θ(ψ + yL) φ ¯m − (ψ + yL)ds = (1 − θ)(ψ + yH ) −φ ¯m + (ψ + yH )ds , ds = φ ¯m[ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] (ψ + yL)(ψ + yH ) ≡ d∗ s. 17 In all search models where consumption is traded in the DFM, its maximum level is bounded above by the condition u′(q∗) = c′(q∗). 20 To be more precise, ds = min{s, d∗ The first order condition for dm can be written as s}. Now let us suppose that ds = s and dm ≤ ¯m. θ[−φdm + (ψ + yH )s] = (1 − θ)[φdm − (ψ + yL)s], which implies that dm = s[ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL] φ ≡ d∗ m. So, in fact, dm = min{ ¯m, d∗ only one of the constraint binds or both bind, we have that if ¯m ≤ d∗ In this case, ds = s only if s ≤ d∗ (dm = ¯m, ds = s) in an equilibrium where ¯m ≤ s (ψ+yL )(ψ+yH ) ¯m ≥ s [ψ+(1−θ)yH +θyL ] ≡ ml. It is easy to check that φ m}. In more detail, since there can be equilibria where m then dm = ¯m. s. In other words, both constraints would be binding φ [ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL] ≡ mh and ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL ≥ (ψ + yL)(ψ + yH ) [ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] , and this condition holds with strict inequality unless yH = yL, or θ = 0, or θ = 1; but none of these happens in our model. Therefore, for all ¯m ∈ [ml, mh] agents exchange dm = ¯m and ds = s. The cases where only one constraint binds are described by the pairs (dm = ¯m < ml, ds = d∗ m < ¯m, ds = s). That is, if money holdings of the buyer are enough to purchase all s from the seller, then d∗ m is handed over in exchange for all s. Otherwise, the buyer will trade away all her money in exchange for d∗ s. All these possible cases are described by the solution below s < s) and (mh = dm = d∗ dm = min(cid:26) ¯m, ds = min(cid:26)s, s[ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL] φ φ ¯m[ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] (ψ + yH )(ψ + yL) (cid:27) , (cid:27) . Once we know how the equilibrium in the DFM looks like, we can solve the rest of the model proceeding as in the previous section. We use the solution to the DFM in the optimization of the first market, and then we find the optimal solution for m and a. We first have to find s so that V 1(m, a) = max s∈[0,a](cid:26) 1 2(cid:2)V 2L (m, b, s) + V 2H (m, b, s)(cid:3)(cid:27) . (18) (19) (20) where now V 2L (m, b, s) = λ 2 V 3L(cid:18)m +Z dm( m, s)dF ( m), b, s −Z ds( m, s)dF ( m)(cid:19) 2(cid:19) V 3L (m, b, s) , +(cid:18)1 − λ 21 and V 2H (m, b, s) = λ 2 V 3H(cid:18)m −Z dm(m, s)dG(s), b, s +Z ds(m, s)dG(s)(cid:19) 2(cid:19) V 3H (m, b, s) . +(cid:18)1 − λ (21) In the previous value functions, F ( m) and G(s) are the distribution of money and security holdings in the economy. Using the solution to the bargaining problem, (19) can be written as + λφ [ψ+θyH +(1−θ)yL ] V 1(m, a) = maxs∈[0,a](cid:8)Λ + φm + (ψ + R)a +(cid:0) 1 4 minn ¯m, 4 minnm, 4 minns, minn¯s, so − λφ mo − φ[ψ+(1−θ)yH +θyL ] λ(ψ+yL ) φ φ 2 yL + 1 [ψ+θyH +(1−θ)yL ] 2 yH − R(cid:1) s ¯so φ[ψ+(1−θ)yH +θyL ] φ φ ¯moo . λ(ψ+yH ) + 4 Remember that at this stage we have to choose s, so we are only interested in the 4th, 5th, and 8th terms. Therefore, focusing only on those terms and rearranging them a little bit we can write the relevant objective function as max s∈[0,a](cid:26)(cid:18) 1 2 yL + 1 2 yH − R(cid:19) s + λ 4 (cid:20)[ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL] min(cid:26) φ ¯m ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL −(ψ + yL) min(cid:26) φ[ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] (ψ + yH )(ψ + yL) , s(cid:27) ¯m, s(cid:27)(cid:21)(cid:27) . or in short max s∈[0,a](cid:26)(cid:18) 1 2 yL + 1 2 yH − R(cid:19) s + λ 4 hαb 1 minnαb 2, so − αb 3 minnαb 4, soi(cid:27) , 3, αb 1, αb 1 ≥ αb It is easy to check that αb 2 > 0, and most importantly, αb i , i = 1, ..., 4, are obvious. 4 > αb where the definitions of αb i ≥ 0, αb 2. Now, let us recall that we are focusing on the interesting case (1/2)(yH + yL) − R ≤ 0. The following can easily be verified by visual inspection after straightforward substitution. If we choose s ≤ αb 2 the objective function above is strictly increasing in s as long as (λθ)/4(yH − yL) > −[(1/2)(yH + yL) − R]. On the other hand, if our choice was s ∈ [αb 4] the objective would become (λ/4)φ ¯m + [(1/2)(yH + yL) − R − (λ/4)(ψ + yL)]s, which is clearly decresing in s. Finally, if s ≥ αb 4 the objective would just be decreasing in s with all but the first term being constant. In a word, the objective function is decreasing for all s beyond αb 2, which yields the following characterization of the solution 2, αb s∗ =  0, if 1 2 (yH + yL) < R − λθ(yH −yL ) 4 , ∈(cid:2)0, min{αb min{αb 2, a}, if 1 2, a}(cid:3) , if 1 2 (yH + yL) > R − 2 (yH + yL) = R − λθ(yH −yL ) 4 4 . λθ(yH −yL ) , (22) 22 2 = φ ¯m ψ+θyH +(1−θ)yL 2 (yH + yL) ≤ R − where αb . As this solution describes, that the DFM actually opens, s∗ > 0, depends on whether the expected return on the risky investment plus the value generated by re-balancing portfolios with bargaining is high enough. If the ex- pected return of securities is low, 1 , it is optimal to set s∗ = 0 and no trade happens in the DFM. All we have to do then is solve for m and a. In this case people store the safe asset only if its price is constant and behaves according to ψ = β(R + ψ), that is ψ = βR/(1 − β). Obviously, in this equilibria money is not essential and will only circulate as long as φ = β φ. On the other hand, if the expected return on securities is good enough, 1 , then s∗ = min{a, αb 2} and we would proceed to solve for m and a using this choice of s. Surprisingly enough, even though in this case there could be trade in the DFM, the only equilibrium that can be supported again features the fundamental value of the real asset, ψ = βR/(1 − β). 2 (yH + yL) ≥ R − λθ(yH −yL ) 4 λθ(yH −yL ) 4 Let us consider first the case of a bad distribution of returns, i.e., (1/2)(yH +yL) ≤ R − (λθ/4)(yH − yL). As we said, s∗ = 0 and we have to choose m and a to solve V 3j(m, b, s) = κ(m, b, s) + max m,a (cid:26)−φ m − ψa + β(cid:20) 1 2 V 2L( m + µM, a, 0) + 1 2 V 2H( m + µM, a, 0)(cid:21)(cid:27) , for j = H, L, where κ(m, b, s) is just a group of terms depending on previous choices of money, real assets, and securities, but does not depend on the actual choice vari- able. Also, remember that in the next period an amount µM of money is injected (subtracted) in (from) the economy. The details of the rest of the computation are available upon request. All that matters is that the optimal decision for next period real asset holdings, a, is given by a∗ =(cid:26) 0, ∈ R+, if ψ > β( ψ + R), if ψ = β( ψ + R), (23) and the optimal next period money holdings, m, will only be positive under certain parameterizations, when φ = β φ. In brief, if the distribution of returns on securities is bad, people will optimally choose not to issue any risky assets. As a consequence, there will be no trade in the DFM and money will only circulate under the Friedman rule. The only feasible path for the asset price is then ψ = βR 1−β . Finally, let us consider the opposite case of a good enough distribution of returns, (1/2)(yH +yL) ≥ R−(λθ/4)(yH −yL). In this scenario, we know that the best decision on issuing risky assets is s∗ = min{a, αb 2}. Using this to solve for m and a we can 23 write V 3j(m, b, s) = κ(m, b, s) + max m,a (cid:26)−φ m − ψa + β(cid:20)1 2 V 2L( m + µM, a − min{a, αb 2}, min{a, αb 2}) + V 2H( m + µM, a − min{a, αb 2}, min{a, αb 1 2 2})(cid:21)(cid:27) , φ( ¯m+µM ) 2 = for j = H, L, where αb sions for dm( ¯m + µM, min{a, αb µM, min{a, αb function If we are careful with the right expres- 2}), dm( m + µM, ¯s), ds( m + µM, ¯s), and ds( ¯m + 2}), and after some algebra, we can arrive at a more useful objective ψ+θyH +(1−θ)yL . max m,a n−(φ − β φ) m − [ψ − β( ψ + R)]a +(cid:20)1 (yL + yH ) − R + λ 4 2 [ ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] + λ φ 4 [ ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL − ( ψ + yL)](cid:21) min(a, − µM) min( m, [ ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] φ ( ψ + yH )( ψ + yL)¯s λ φ 4 min( m, ψ + yL [ ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL]¯s φ − µM)) φ( ¯m + µM ) ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL) ≡ max m {−cm 1 m + cm 2 min{ m, cm {−ca + max 3 } − cm 1a + ca 4 min{ m, cm 2 min{a, ca 5 }} 3}}, a where the definitions of cm solutions for m and a are fully described below i and ca k, i = 1, ..., 5, k = 1, 2, 3, are obvious. The optimal 0, if cm ∈ [0, cm cm 3 , if cm 2 < cm 3 ], if cm 2 > cm 1 + cm 4 , 1 + cm 2 = cm 4 , 1 + cm 4 , m∗ =  and a∗ =  2 < ca 1, 2 > ca 1 3], if ca 2 = ca 0, if ca ca 3, if ca ∈ [0, ca ∈ [ca 3, +∞], if ca 1, ca 1 = 0. (24) 1 6= 0, However, it is important to notice that with this optimal decisions market clearing in the DFM fails in the following sense. Within any given period the position of agents on money, m, and the real asset, a, are optimally chosen in the previous period, having taken into account the optimal choice for s this period. Thus, within any given period (ψ+yH )(ψ+yL )s [ψ+(1−θ)yH +θyL ]φ, which are 3 = 2 = φm ψ+θyH +(1−θ)yLo and m = cm we have s = minna, αb 24 clearly incompatible since we have shown that ψ + θyH + (1 − θ)yL > Therefore, the only possible equilibrium has ca 1 = 0, ψ∗ = βR (ψ+yH )(ψ+yL ) [ψ+(1−θ)yH +θyL ] . 3 , and 1−β , m∗ = cm a∗ = A = φ( ¯m + µM )[ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] ( ψ + yH )( ψ + yL) . Finally, we characterize the range of monetary policies consistent with equilibria under bargaining in the case of a good distribution of return. The optimal choice of money balances requires that λ φ 4 [ ψ + (1 − θ)yH + θyL] ( ψ + yL) ≥ φ − β φ + λ φ 4 . Now, if we use the fact that the only possible path for the price of the asset is ψ = βR/(1 − β) and rearrange the expression, we arrive at µ ≤ β − 1 + λ 4 (1 − θ)(yH − yL) βR 1−β + yL = ¯µb, (25) where we have used the fact that in a steady state φ = φ(1 + µ). We conclude that there are many policies consistent with equilibrium, µ ∈ [β − 1, ¯µb]. However, none of them affect asset prices, since ψ in this framework always reflects the fundamental value of the asset. 25 Figure 1: Securities Demand and Supply 26 Figure 2: Optimal Choice of Securities 27 Figure 3: Asset Price and Inflation 28
1907.04272	1	1907	2019-07-09T16:19:21	Ordinal Imitative Dynamics	[ "econ.TH" ]	This paper introduces an evolutionary dynamics based on imitate the better realization (IBR) rule. Under this rule, agents in a population game imitate the strategy of a randomly chosen opponent whenever the opponent`s realized payoff is higher than their own. Such behavior generates an ordinal mean dynamics which is polynomial in strategy utilization frequencies. We demonstrate that while the dynamics does not possess Nash stationarity or payoff monotonicity, under it pure strategies iteratively strictly dominated by pure strategies are eliminated and strict equilibria are locally stable. We investigate the relationship between the dynamics based on the IBR rule and the replicator dynamics. In trivial cases, the two dynamics are topologically equivalent. In Rock-Paper-Scissors games we conjecture that both dynamics exhibit the same types of behavior, but the partitions of the game set do not coincide. In other cases, the IBR dynamics exhibits behaviors that are impossible under the replicator dynamics.	econ.TH	econ	Ordinal Imitative Dynamics George Loginov∗ July 10, 2019 Abstract This paper introduces an evolutionary dynamics based on imitate the better realization (IBR) rule. Under this rule, agents in a population game imitate the strategy of a randomly chosen opponent whenever the opponent's realized payoff is higher than their own. Such behavior generates an ordinal mean dynamics which is polynomial in strategy utilization frequencies. We demonstrate that while the dynamics does not possess Nash stationarity or payoff monotonicity, under it pure strategies iteratively strictly dominated by pure strategies are eliminated and strict equilibria are locally stable. We investigate the relationship between the dynamics based on the IBR rule and the replicator dynamics. In trivial cases, the two dynamics are topologically equivalent. In Rock-Paper-Scissors games we conjecture that both dynamics exhibit the same types of behavior, but the partitions of the game set do not coincide. In other cases, the IBR dynamics exhibits behaviors that are impossible under the replicator dynamics. 1 Introduction When information about the available strategies and their payoffs is limited, it may be reasonable for players in a population game to copy the behavior of their opponents if it yields or at least seems to yield better payoffs. Such copying gives rise to a family of imitative revision protocols, in which a player's decision to switch strategies depends on some summary of the relative performance of a random sample of opponents the player gets to observe. The two components that comprise any imitative protocol are the sampling procedure which determines the candidates to be imitated, and the conditional imitation rate which describes the likelihood of imitation given the information about the candidates' strategies and payoffs. With respect to the payoff information one can distinguish between protocols ∗Department of Economics, Augustana University, 2001 S Summit Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57197, USA. Email: [email protected] 1 that rely on average payoffs and ones that only depend on realized payoffs from a small number of matches. This paper studies the imitative protocol with the fewest information requirements. A player who gets a revision opportunity observes one opponent from the population at random and switches to that opponent's strategy whenever the opponent's realized payoff is higher than his or her own. This revision rule labeled imitate the better realization (IBR) was first studied in Izquierdo and Izquierdo (2013) in the context of two-strategy games. (We elaborate on their results in Section 3.) It gives rise to ordinal mean dynamics since it ignores the magnitudes of payoff differences, and the resulting dynamics is polynomial in strategy utilization frequencies. The disregard of the payoff differences deprives the dynamics of some common car- dinal properties. For instance, the Nash equilibria of the base game need not be the rest points of the dynamics, and the average payoffs need not improve along the solution trajectories. At a rest point, instead of equilibrating the average payoffs of the surviving strategies, the dynamics balances the flows to and from each surviving strategy. Despite not being monotone in average payoffs, the dynamics still eliminates pure strategies iteratively dominated by pure strategies. Weakly dominated strategies and pure strategies dominated by mixed strategies, on the contrary, may survive. In addition, we demonstrate that strict equilbria are locally stable. The dynamics generated by the IBR rule in many cases qualitatively resembles the replicator dynamics, which can be derived from the pairwise proportional imitation rule of Schlag (1998). Under the PPI rule a revising agent observes one opponent from the population at random and switches to that opponent's strategy at a rate proportional to the payoff advantage of that strategy. Thus, both the IBR and the PPI rule are based on comparisons of realized payoffs, but the magnitudes of payoffs matter only under the latter rule. In two-strategy games the IBR dynamics and the replicator dynamics are topologically equivalent: they have the same number of rest points, and their stability and convergence properties are the same. In the Rock-Paper-Scissors games both dynamics exhibit one of the three possible behaviors: global convergence to the rest point, global convergence to the boundary, or closed orbits around the rest point1, but these behaviors need to be the same. In other cases, for instance in Zeeman's game, the number of interior rest points the two dynamics possess is different. The study of ordinal imitative dynamics originated with Hofbauer (1995) and Schlag (1998), in which the imitate if better (IB) dynamics -- the average payoff counterpart of imitate the better realization -- were introduced and their main properties established. In particular, Hofbauer (1995) demonstrates that in the Rock-Paper-Scissors games the IB dynamics behaves similarly to the replicator dynamics. A surprising result is that IB need 1In the first two cases we make a conjecture about global behavior based on local stability analysis and simulations. In the third case we prove the statement formally. 2 not eliminate dominated strategies. Finally, put in the larger context, the imitate the better realization rule can be viewed as an analogue of the word-of-mouth communication model (Ellison and Fudenberg (1993)) for strategic environments: agents can learn about the relative merits of strategies from others' experiences, but need not be able to find out the exact advantage of a particular strategy. For instance, one can learn about a better route from a neighbor or a better mode of behavior from an elder. 2 The Imitate the Better Realization protocol and its properties of all such population states is the (n − 1)-dimensional simplex ∆ = {x (cid:80)n Suppose that a continuum of agents of mass 1 are randomly matched to play a symmetric two-player game with the payoff matrix A. Let S = {1, . . . , n} be the set of strategies, and for i, j ∈ S let πij be the payoff of strategy i against strategy j. At any instant, the population state x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) describes the proportion of players choosing each strategy. The set i=1 xi = 1, xi ≥ 0}. Assume that the agents do not know the structure of the game, they are not aware of all the available strategies, and they don't keep the record of the strategies they used in the past or the payoffs they received in their previous interactions. In addition, they don't know the current population state and they are not capable of correctly anticipating the way it will evolve. The only piece of information they possess and are able to retain is their current payoff, and the only way they can learn about alternative modes of behavior is by observing the strategies of others. The only objective of the agents compatible with these assumptions is maximizing their current payoffs. As usual in a population setting, they are only able to switch their strategies infrequently, and once a strategy revision opportunity arises, the revising agent observes one opponent from the population at random and switches to that opponent's strategy whenever the opponent's realized payoff is higher than his or her own. Effectively, the revising agent gets to compare their current payoff to a sample payoff of some other strategy without learning the circumstance under which that sample payoff was obtained. Thus agents cannot distinguish between strategies that perform better on average and favorable circumstances in which worse strategies outperform better ones. Besides, upon switching to the candidate strategy the agent's payoff may differ from the sample payoff he or she got to observe. As a result, such "blind" imitation may not be improving in terms of average payoffs, and yet it eliminates dominated strategies. Given this imitate the better realization revision protocol, the switch rate ρij from strategy i to strategy j can be expressed as the probability that a payoff drawn from the j-th row of the payoff matrix A exceeds a payoff drawn from the i-th row, with the population state x 3 serving as the probability distribution: (IBR) ρij(x, A) = xj xk n(cid:88)k=1 n(cid:88)m=1 xm1{πjk>πim} The population setting offers the following interpretation: the realized payoff of a revising agent playing strategy i equals πim with probability xm for m ∈ S. Such an agent would observe a payoff realization πjk for strategy j with probability xjxk for k ∈ S. Summing over m and k and counting the cases in which the payoff to the candidate strategy j is better yields the probability of switching ρij(x, A). A stochastic process that emerges when agents in the population independently receive revision opportunities can be approximated by its mean dynamics which describes the expected change in the proportion of agents playing each strategy (Benaım and Weibull (2003)). The mean dynamics of the process governed by imitation of the better realization is xi = xjρji(x, A) − xi n(cid:88)j=1 n(cid:88)j=1 (IBRD) = xi ρij(x, A) n(cid:88)j=1 xm(1{πjk<πim} − 1{πjk>πim}) n(cid:88)m=1 xk n(cid:88)k=1 xj Thus in general the IBR dynamics is a quartic polynomial in n variables {x1, x2, . . . , xn}, but in certain cases, as shown in the next subsection, it reduces to the replicator dynam- ics which is cubic in xi and is the mean dynamics for a number of more information- demanding imitative rules (Imitation via pairwise comparisons of Helbing (1992) and Schlag (1998), imitation driven by dissatisfaction of Bjornerstedt and Weibull (1996), and imitation of success of Hofbauer (1995), see also Section 5.4.2 in Sandholm (2010)). 2.1 Relation to the replicator dynamics The connection between the IBR dynamics and the replicator dynamics can be estab- lished via the pairwise proportional imitation protocol (PPI) introduced in Schlag (1998). Under the PPI the revising agent observes one opponent from the population at ran- dom and imitates that opponent's strategy at a rate proportional to its payoff advantage. Compared to the PPI rule based on realized payoffs, the IBR rule suppresses any payoff differences, thus under the IBR rule all conditional switch rates to strategies that exhibit higher outcomes are the same, whereas under the PPI rule the switch rate is higher the higher the outcome. Under the PPI rule based on realized payoffs, an agent whose strategy i yields payoff πim for some m ∈ S switches to strategy j if the observed payoff realization πjk exceeds 4 πim, with a conditional switch rate proportional to the payoff advantage of j, which is [πjk − πim]+. Accounting for the likelihood of each payoff realization πjk one can express the switch rate from strategy i to strategy j as (PPIR) ρij(x, A) = xj xk n(cid:88)k=1 n(cid:88)m=1 xm[πjk − πim]+ The PPI rule based on average payoffs generates the switch rates in the form (PPIA) ρij(x, A) = xj[πj − πi]+ where xj is the probability of sampling an agent whose strategy is j, and the term [πj− πi]+ is the (average) payoff advantage of strategy j over i. Due to linearity of average payoffs in strategy utilization frequencies xi, both kinds of proportional imitation generate the replicator dynamics as their mean dynamics (Theorem 3 of Schlag (1998)): (RD) xi = xi (πi − ¯π) The difference in the conditional switch rates under the IBR and the PPI rules leads to a significant dissimilarity in the resulting mean dynamics. The rest points of the replicator dynamics are the restricted equilibria of the underlying game, so the average payoffs to all active strategies are the same and the agents have no incentives to switch between them. The rest points of the IBR dynamics, on the other hand, are "ordinal restricted equilibria" in which the net flow for each strategy is zero. Yet it is possible that the flows between the active strategies are positive at a rest point, and the average payoffs to strategies need not be the same. Thus in general, the sets of the rest points for the replicator and the IBR dynamics do not coincide. However, as the following proposition states, when the cardinality of the set of payoffs is low the IBR dynamics coincides with the replicator dynamics up to a constant change of speed. Proposition 1. If the payoff matrix A contains only two distinct payoffs, the IBR dynamics reduces to the replicator dynamics up to a constant change of speed. Proof. Suppose WLOG that the set of payoffs is {πij} = {0, k} for some k > 0. Then for any pair of strategy profiles involving the strategies i and j the conditional switch rates from i to j under the IBR rule are proportional to those under the PPI rule. For any i, j, k, m ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n} the following holds: [πjk − πim]+ = k · 1{πjk>πim}, therefore ρPPI ij by 1 k . (x, A) = k · ρIBR ij (x, A), so the IBR dynamics is the replicator dynamics scaled (cid:3) 5 The converse of Proposition 1 need not be true. Example 1 contains a game with four distinct payoffs in which both protocols generate the same dynamics. Example 1. Consider the coordination game with the payoff matrix (cid:32) 4 3 1 2 (cid:33) x = x(1 − x)(2x − 1). Under the Both the IBR and the PPI protocols generate the same dynamics: PPI rule an agent with payoff π22 = 2 who observes a candidate with payoff π11 = 4 is twice as likely to switch to strategy 1 than an agent with payoff π21 = 3, but at the same time an agent with payoff π12 = 1 is twice as likely to switch to strategy 2 when he or she observes a candidate with payoff π21 = 3 rather than a candidate with payoff π22 = 2. These higher switch rates annihilate each other, so in the end the flows between the strategies are identical to those under the IBR rule, when all switch rates upon observing a better outcome are the same. (cid:3) Section 4.1 presents another example in which the two dynamics draw closer: in the standard Rock-Paper-Scissors game the IBR dynamics can be obtained from the replicator dynamics by a positive non-constant change of speed. But Example 1 and the standard RPS game are an exception to the general rule. 2.2 Payoff monotonicity and payoff positivity In this section it is shown that the IBR dynamics need not preserve such cardinal properties as payoff monotonicity and payoff positivity. Payoff monotonicity (Nachbar (1990)) requires that the order of growth rates be the same as the order of average payoffs (if πi > πj then xi ). Payoff positivity (Nachbar (1990)) is a weaker requirement that xi a strategy have a positive growth rate if and only if its payoff is higher than the average payoff in the population. Weak payoff positivity (Weibull (1995)) is an even weaker requirement that among the strategies with above-average payoffs there is one with a positive growth rate. The next example demonstrates that all these properties are violated for the IBR dynamics even in two-strategy games: xj xj > Example 2. Consider the coordination game with the payoff matrix A A =(cid:32) 10 3 0 3 (cid:33) Let x be the frequency of the first (top) strategy in the population. The mixed strategy equilibrium in game A is x∗ = 0.3, and for all x > x∗ the average payoff of the first strategy is higher than that of the second strategy. But the IBR dynamics for A is x = x(1 − x)(2x − 1), 6 so for all x < 0.5 the proportion of agents playing the first strategy is decreasing. Thus, for instance, when x = 0.4 π1 = 4 > 3 = π2, but x(0.4) < 0, and so the IBR dynamics is neither payoff monotone nor payoff positive. (cid:3) Depending on the payoffs, any state x∗ ∈ (0, 1) can be the mixed Nash equilibrium of the game which has the same order of payoffs as game A from the Example 2. Yet for all such games the IBR dynamics selects x = 0.5 as the rest point, so the monotonicity and positivity properties are violated precisely at the states between x∗ and 0.5. When the population state is between x∗ and 0.5, the first strategy already has a higher average payoff yet the majority of agents playing it receive the lowest payoff and thus would treat switching to the other strategy as an improvement. The switches in the opposite direction are less likely since the agents currently playing the second strategy would only imitate the minority of strategy 1 agents who currently receive the overall highest payoff. In the remainder of the state space the vector fields of the IBR dynamics and the replicator dynamics point in the same direction. For this to happen, a strategy with a higher average payoff needs to guarantee a better payoff for a larger share of agents than the other strategy. This intuition also paves the way for the next result: elimination of dominated strate- gies. If strategy 1 dominates strategy 2, then at any interior population state there will be a positive flow from 2 to 1, and the net inflow from any other strategy would be higher for 1 than for 2. Together these effects result in the ultimate extinction of strategy 2. 2.3 Elimination of dominated strategies This section sharpens the results on elimination of dominated strategies for imitative dynamics. As established by Nachbar (1990) and Samuelson and Zhang (1992), "cardinal" imitative dynamics, including the replicator dynamics, eliminate pure strategies (itera- tively) dominated by other pure strategies due to payoff monotonicity. The IBR dynamics, on the contrary, is a non-monotone imitative dynamics which still eliminates such domi- nated strategies. In terms of the comparison between the PPI and the IBR rules, this result means that imitation alone can be sufficient for the elimination of dominated strategies. In addition, Hofbauer and Sandholm (2011) demonstrate that under most dynamics not based on imitation dominated pure strategies can survive, in part because the agents in a population setting may be unable to recognize dominated strategies and thus avoid them. In the case of the IBR dynamics, the available payoff information is also insufficient to identify dominated strategies, and yet the agent switch away from them in the course of the play. Proposition 2. If a strategy is (iteratively) dominated by another pure strategy, then it is eliminated along any interior solution of the IBR dynamics. Proof. Suppose that strategy j is dominated by strategy i. Fix k ∈ {1, . . . , n}, by dominance πik > πjk. Take a strategy p (cid:44) i, j and consider all possible strategy profiles (p, q) that might 7 arise in a match involving an agent playing this strategy. For a fixed q ∈ {1, . . . , n} the payoff πpq would fall into one of these three categories: 1. πpq ≤ πjk < πik, in which case there is an inflow into each strategy: (xpxqxk)xi into strategy i and (xpxqxk)xj into j. Let Pkxi and Pkxj denote the total flows in this case. 2. πjk < πpq ≤ πik, so there is outflow from strategy j and inflow into strategy i, with total flows expressed as some Qkxi and Qkxj. 3. πjk < πik < πpq, so there is outflow from both strategies, with total outflow expressed by Rkxi and Rkxj. In addition, there is net inflow Txixj from strategy j to i which includes at least the terms x2 kxixj. In terms of these flow components the change in the population proportion for the strategies i and j can be expressed as xi = xj = (Pkxi + Qkxi − Rkxi) + Txixj n(cid:88)k=1 n(cid:88)k=1(cid:16)Pkxj − Qkxj − Rkxj(cid:17) − Txixj and so the change in the difference d in growth rates of the two strategies is always positive: d = xi xi − xj xj = 2 n(cid:88)k=1 Qk + T(xi + xj) > 0 Therefore, using the standard method (see, for instance, Proposition 1 in Viossat (2015)), d → +∞ as t → ∞, and thus strategy j is eliminated. In the restricted game in which strategy j is eliminated, one can apply the same reasoning to demonstrate that any strategy that becomes dominated will be eliminated as well. Thus by continuity of the IBR dynamics in the neighborhood of the edge opposite to the vertex xj = 1 in the original game (this edge corresponds to the simplex of the restricted game) the dynamics will select against the iteratively dominated strategies. See game A2 in the example 3 for an illustration to this argument. (cid:3) With a slight adjustment (πik > πjk would hold for at least one k, but not necessary all k ∈ {1, . . . , n}) the argument can be applied to weakly dominated strategies as well, but one should only consider weakly dominated strategies after all strictly dominated strategies are eliminated. Otherwise, a strategy that is weakly dominated only with respect to a strictly dominated strategy may survive, as illustrated by game A1 in the following example. 8 Example 3. Consider2 the games A1 and A2 1 1 0 1 1 0 A1 = 2 1 0  3 2 1 2 1 0 A2 = 0 3 2  Figure 1: Some solution trajectories in games A1 (left) and A2 (right). In the game A1 strategy 3 is dominated by both 1 and 2, strategy 2 is weakly dominated by 1, but once strategy 3 is eliminated, both 1 and 2 coexist. From the perspective of an agent playing strategy 3 the remaining two strategies are equally good. The only case when strategy 1 gains advantage over strategy 2 is when an agent playing strategy 2 gets to imitate someone playing 1 against 3. The probability of observing such a candidate is x1x3, so the switch rate from strategy 2 to strategy 1 is low near the pure state x3 = 1 and near the edge x3 = 0. It is relatively high near the center of the simplex where the expression x1x2x3 is maximized. In the game A2 strategy 3 is dominated by strategy 2, and after strategy 3 is eliminated, strategy 2 is dominated by strategy 1. In this game the solution trajectories originating near the pure state x3 = 1 first move in the direction of the pure state x2 = 1, since when most agents choose strategy 3 almost no one gets to imitate strategy 1 as the majority of strategy 1 agents receive the lowest payoff. But after the population state gets sufficiently close to x2 = 1 and the strategy 3 becomes almost extinct, agents begin to realize the advantage of 1 over 2. (cid:3) Another example that complements the result of Proposition 2 demonstrates that a strategy dominated by mixed strategies may survive. Example 4. Consider the games A3 and A4 with α ∈ (1, 4): 2The figures in this and other examples are generated in EvoDyn-3s. See Izquierdo et al. (2018). 9 A3 = 4 4 1 α α α 1 1 4  A4 = 1 1 4 α α α 4 4 1  Compared to game A3, the order of payoffs in game A4 is reversed. In both games strategy 2 is always the second best, and when α < 2.5, it is dominated by a mixed strategy of 1 and 3. The IBR dynamics in game A3 is x = x(1 − x)(1 − 2z) y = y(z − x)(1 − 2z) z = z(1 − z)(2z − 1) where x, y, and z are the proportions of strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively. When exactly half of the population (z = 1 2) chooses strategy 3, strategy 2 can survive. In the game A3, strategy 2 is 2, while 3 is better than 2 when z > 1 otherwise eliminated: strategy 1 is better than 2 when z < 1 2. Figure 2: Some solution trajectories in games A3 (left) and A4 (right). The critical region is z = 1 2. In game A4 with the reversed order of payoffs the critical region z = 1 2 becomes absorbing, which suggests that strategy 2 survives along any trajectory originating in the interior of the state space.(cid:3) 2.4 Stability of strict equilibria We conclude this section with a stability property for strict equilibria. If a strategy i is the unique best response to itself, then in the neighborhood of a pure state xi = 1 any agent who currently employs a strategy j (cid:44) i would be most likely matched against an opponent playing strategy i, and upon receiving a revision opportunity would most likely observe a 10 candidate earning πii and as a consequence switch to i. The behavior of such agents would create an inflow into the strategy i which is of higher order than any potential outflow caused by payoff advantages of other strategies over i, so the proportion of agents playing i would increase, making the state xi = 1 a stable rest point. Proposition 3. Strict symmetric equilibria are locally stable with a basin of attraction that includes all states with xi > 1 − 1√2. Proof. Suppose that the strategy profile (i, i) is a strict equilibrium. To show that it is locally stable it is enough to demonstrate that xi > 0 in some neighborhood of the pure state xi = 1 as this implies that the function L(x) = xi is a strict local Lyapunov function for the state xi = 1. To do so, construct the lower bound on xi by considering a game with the lowest net inflow into the strategy i. Let xi = 1 − . Since (i, i) is a strict equilibrium, for any j (cid:44) i we have πii > πji, so strategy i would be imitated by any agent who currently obtains πji and who observes a i(cid:80)j(cid:44)i xj = (1−)3, candidate obtaining πii. Such switches to strategy i create an inflow of x3 which is a lower bound on the inflow into strategy i. To obtain a lower bound on xi, assume that in all other cases strategy i performs worse than its alternatives, i.e. πim < πjk for any m ∈ S and j, k (cid:44) i and πik < πji for any j, k (cid:44) i. In m=1 xixm(cid:80)j,k(cid:44)i xjxk = (1 − )2, and in the the former case the outflow from strategy i is(cid:80)n latter it is(cid:80)k(cid:44)i xixk(cid:80)j(cid:44)i xjxi = (1 − )22. The sum of these two components is the upper Subtracting the highest outflow from the lowest inflow yields the desired lower bound: bound on the outflow from strategy i. xi = xjρji(x, A) − xi xj xk n(cid:88)k=1 n(cid:88)m=1 = xi n(cid:88)j=1 n(cid:88)j=1 i(cid:88)j(cid:44)i ≥ x3 ρij(x, A) n(cid:88)j=1 xm1{πjk<πim} − xi xj xk n(cid:88)k=1 n(cid:88)m=1 n(cid:88)j=1 i(cid:88)k(cid:44)i xjxk1{πjk>πim} − x2 xm1{πjk>πim} xk(cid:88)j(cid:44)i xj1{πik<πji} n(cid:88)m=1 xj1{πji<πii} − xi xm(cid:88)j,k(cid:44)i ≥ (1 − )3 − (1 − )2 − (1 − )22 ≥ (1 − )(cid:16)1 − 4 + 22(cid:17) ≥ 0 when < 1 − 1√2 Thus whenever < 1− 1√2 to xi = 1, so any strict symmetric equilibrium is locally stable. . 11 the trajectory from an initial condition with xi = 1− converges (cid:3) 3 Two-strategy games In this section we completely characterize the behavior of the IBR dynamics for two- strategy games. This topic was first studied in Izquierdo and Izquierdo (2013), in which the dynamics is used to approximate the behavior of a finite population of agents who employ the IBR rule in the Hawk-Dove game. Izquierdo and Izquierdo (2013) also derive the general IBR equation for two-strategy games. Our paper complements their findings by identifying all possible rest points of the dynamics, and by demonstrating its equivalence to the replicator dynamics in terms of the number of rest points and the local behavior around them. For two-strategy games with two distinct payoffs the IBR dynamics and the replicator dynamics coincide. The table below presents all possible cases with 3 or 4 distinct payoffs, grouped by the game type: D -- game with a dominant strategy, W -- game with a weakly dominant strategy, C -- coordination game, A -- anticoordination game. D1 3 D7 3 W1 2 C1 A1 1 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 3 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 4 2 2 2 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 2 3 1 3 D2 3 D8 3 W2 3 C2 A2 2 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 3 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 4 1 1 1 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 2 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 1 1 3 3 D3 2 D9 2 W3 2 C3 A3 1 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 3 (cid:33) 3 (cid:33) 4 1 2 3 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 4 (cid:32) 1 1 2 2 D4 4 D10 3 W4 3 C4 A4 1 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 3 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 3 2 1 2 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 2 (cid:32) 2 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 2 1 2 3 D5 4 D11 2 W5 1 C5 A5 2 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 3 1 1 1 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 1 2 2 2 D6 4 D12 3 W6 3 C6 A6 3 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 2 (cid:33) 1 (cid:33) 3 1 1 1 (cid:32) 2 (cid:32) 2 (cid:32) 1 (cid:32) 3 (cid:32) 1 1 1 2 Table 1: types of two-strategy games with 3 or 4 distinct payoffs In games with a (weakly) dominant strategy the set of rest points is {0, 1}, and trajectories from any interior state converge to state x = 1. 12 types D1, D2, D4, D5, D7, D8, D11, D12 D3, D6 D9 D10 W1, W6 W2, W5 W3 W4 mean dynamics x = x(1 − x) x = x(1 − x)[x2 + (1 − x)2] x = x(1 − x)[x + (1 − x)2] x = x(1 − x)[x2 + (1 − x)] x = x(1 − x)3 x = x3(1 − x) x = x2(1 − x)(1 + x) x = x(1 − x)2(1 + x) Table 2: the mean dynamics for the games with (weakly) dominant strategies In coordination games the set of rest points is {0, 1− are repelling, and trajectories from the interior states converge to the boundary states. , 1 2 , 1}. The interior rest points √2 2 , 3−√5 2 types C1 C2, C3, C5 C4, C6 mean dynamics x = x(1 − x)[−2x2 + 4x − 1] x = x(1 − x)[2x − 1] x = x(1 − x)[−x2 + 3x − 1] interior RP √2 2 ≈ 0.293 x = 1 − x = 1 2 x = 3−√5 2 ≈ 0.382 Table 3: the mean dynamics for coordination games In anticoordination games the set of rest points is {0, 1 , 1}. Essentially, the rest 2 , points in coordination and anticoordination games are the same save for the order of the strategies. The trajectories from the interior states converge to the interior rest point. , 1√2 2 √5−1 types A1 A2, A3, A5 A4, A6 mean dynamics x = x(1 − x)[1 − 2x2] x = x(1 − x)[1 − 2x] x = x(1 − x)[−x2 − x + 1] interior RP x = 1√2 ≈ 0.707 x = 1 2 x = √5−1 2 ≈ 0.618 Table 4: the mean dynamics for anticoordination games Thus, the IBR dynamics exhibits the same properties as the replicator dynamics: in games with a dominant strategy both dynamics select it; in coordination games trajectories from the interior converge to one of the two pure states, while in anticoordination games trajectories converge to the interior rest point. As a corollary, this characterization also describes the behavior of the IBR dynamics on the boundary of the state space in a three-strategy game, since once one of the three strategies becomes extinct it is never reintroduced. Thus each boundary of the two- dimensional simplex can only have at most one rest point, unless the whole boundary 13 is the rest area (which is possible in degenerate cases). Besides, this characterization shows that the interior rest points of the dynamics can only take one of the five possible values, and suggests that similar sets of rest points can be identified for games with more strategies. 4 Rock-Paper-Scissors games 4.1 Symmetric RPS games First consider the symmetric RPS game with the payoff matrix A and a, b > 0. 0 b −a −a 0 b A = b −a 0  For any values of the payoff parameters the game A induces the same order of payoffs as the standard RPS game, for which the replicator dynamics is x = x(z − y), y = y(x − z), z = z(y − x), where x, y, and z are the shares of agents playing Rock, Paper, and Scissors, respectively. The mean dynamics in game A generated by the IBR protocol is x = x(z − y)(1 − xy − xz − yz), y = y(x − z)(1 − xy − xz − yz), z = z(y − x)(1 − xy − xz − yz) Thus in the standard RPS game the IBR dynamics is the replicator dynamics with speed adjusted by the positive non-constant function (1 − xy − xz − yz). This relationship helps identify the global behavior of the IBR dynamics in symmetric RPS games. Proposition 4. In all symmetric RPS games the trajectories under the IBR dynamics are closed orbits around the unique interior rest point ( 1 3 , 1 3 , 1 3). Proof. Clearly, the only interior solution to the system (RPS) is x∗ = y∗ = z∗ = 1 3. Since the IBR dynamics is the speed-adjusted replicator dynamics for this game, the Lyapunov function H(x) = x∗ log x z∗ (introduced in Theorem 6 in Zeeman (1980)) would be constant along the solutions of the IBR dynamics for all symmetric RPS games. (cid:3) x∗ +y∗ log y y∗ +z∗ log z 14 Intuitively, in the standard RPS game the average payoff to a strategy (the information about the candidate strategy that a player receives under the proportional imitation rule based on the average payoffs) is equivalent to learning about the difference in shares of winners and losers under that strategy. So the average payoff under the PPI rule is higher whenever the likelihood of switching under the IBR rule is higher. 4.2 Ordered RPS games In general under the replicator dynamics the behavior of the system in the Rock-Paper- Scissors game solely depends on the determinant of the payoff matrix A. If det A = 0, the solution trajectories form closed orbits around the interior steady state. If det A > 0, the interior steady state is a global attractor, whereas if det A < 0 it is repelling (Zeeman (1980)). Under the IBR dynamics we conjecture3 that the global behavior of the system can be one of the same three types: either all solutions converge to the interior steady state, or form closed orbits around it, or converge to the boundary. The difference is, the behavior depends on the order of payoffs, so for a fixed RPS game one can have any combination of behaviors under the replicator and the IBR dynamics. In Table 5 we consider the nine possible orderings over the payoffs in the RPS game. In all cases Rock yields the highest positive payoff. 0 2 -1 0 1 -2 0 2 -3 -3 0 1 -3 0 2 -1 0 1 A1 = B1 = C1 = 3 -1 3 -2 0  0  0  3 -2 0 2 -3 0 1 -3 0 2 -2 -2 0 1 -1 0 2 -3 0 1 A2 = B2 = C2 = 3 -2 3 -1 0  0  0  3 -1 0 2 -2 0 1 -1 0 2 -1 -1 0 1 -2 0 2 -2 0 1 A3 = B3 = C3 = 3 -3 0  0  0  3 -3 3 -3 Table 5: The interior steady state is repelling in A1-A3, an attractor in B1-B3, and a center in C1-C3. Each B game is obtained from an A game with the same index by reversing the order of payoffs and subsequently relabelling the strategies. This procedure reverses the flows along the solution trajectories, so the repelling rest points in games of type A become attractors in games of type B. The next proposition states this result formally. 3We provide the proof of that statement for the closed orbits case, and state it as a conjecture for the remaining two cases based on simulations. 15 To identify the interior rest points notice that x = 0 requires y = z, in which case y = 0 reduces to The IBR dynamics in game A1 can be written as x(z − y)(x2 + y + z) y(x − z)(x2 + y + z) + yz(y − x)(x + z) z(y − x)(x2 + y + z) − yz(y − x)(x + z) x y z = F(x, y, z) = (x − y)(cid:16)x2 + 2y − y(x + y)(cid:17) = 0. (1 − 3y)(cid:16)5y2 − 3y + 1(cid:17) = 0, Plugging in x = 1 − 2y results in the equation Figure 3: Some solution trajectories for games A1, B3, and C2. Proposition 5. i) The unique interior rest point in any A game is repelling. ii) For any i ∈ {1, 2, 3} the game Bi can be obtained from the game (−Ai) by relabeling the strategies. Proof. i) The statement is proved for the game A1 by direct computation. The proofs for games A2 and A3 are similar. with the only real solution y = 1 ( 1 3 , 1 3 , 1 3). To identify the local behavior of the system F around the interior steady state, project 3. Thus the unique interior rest point of the system F is it from R3 onto ∆3, the two-dimensional simplex, to obtain the system F(x, y) =(cid:32) y(2x + y − 1)(y2 − y + 1) + 2xy(y − x)(1 − x − y)(cid:33) x(1 − x − 2y)(x2 − x + 1) 16 The Jacobian of this system evaluated at the rest point ( 1 3 , 1 3) is 1 1 12 3 , 3(cid:19) = D F(cid:18)1 27(cid:32)−7 −14 9 (cid:33) with the eigenvalues 1±2i√26 is repelling. ii) To see the relationship between A1 and B1, write the matrices A1,−A1, and B1 side by side: . Since both eigenvalues have positive real parts the rest point 27 The game B1 can be obtained from (−A1) by relabeling strategies 2 and 3. Formally the IBR dynamics in game B1 can be written as 0 2 -1 A1 = G(x, y, z) = -3 0 1 -3 2 3 -2 3 0 -1 0 -2 1 0  −A1 = 0  B1 = z(y − x)(x2 + y + z) + yz(x − z)(x + y) y(x − z)(x2 + y + z) − yz(x − z)(x + y) x(z − y)(x2 + y + z) x y z = 0 1 -2 -3 0 2 3 -1 0  so −F(x, y, z) = G(x, z, y). Thus the system G is the time-reversed system F, so the eigenval- ues of the Jacobian evaluated at the interior rest point of G both have negative real parts, and that rest point is an attractor. (cid:3) Games of type C require a different approach, since in them the eigenvalues of the Jacobian at the interior rest point are purely imaginary, so the local stability analysis using the Jacobian does not produce an unambiguous result. However, this obstacle can be overcome once one notices that up to the strategy labels, reversing the order in any C game results in the same game. Proposition 6. The unique interior rest point in any C game is a center, and any trajectory from the interior forms a closed orbit around it. Proof. The proposition is proved for the game C2. The proof for games C1 and C3 is similar. Observe that the negative of the game C2 is C2 with strategies 2 and 3 interchanged. 0 2 -2 -3 0 1 C2 = 3 -1 0  0 -2 2 3 0 -1 −C2 = -3 1 0  17 Formally, the IBR dynamics in C2 H(x, y, z) = x y z = x(z − y)(x2 + y + z) y(x − z)(x2 + y + z) − yz(x2 − xy − xz − yz) z(y − x)(x2 + y + z) + yz(x2 − xy − xz − yz) has the property −H(x, y, z) = H(x, z, y). To identify the interior rest points of the system H observe that x = 0 requires z = y, so that x = 1 − y − z = 1 − 2y. Plugging the expressions for x and z into y = 0 yields the equation 1 − 6y + 16y2 − 19y3 = 0, which only has one root y ≈ 0.374 in the interval [0, 1]. Thus x∗ ≈ (0.252, 0.374, 0.374) is the unique interior rest point of the system H. To show that the solution trajectories originating in the interior of the simplex form closed orbits around the rest point x∗, we first show that any such solution circles around x∗ and then apply the "self-negating" property to conclude that any circular solution trajectory must be indeed a closed orbit. Figure 4: Left: the nullclines divide the simplex into 6 regions. Right: solution trajectories from the marked points have to remain within the red areas. Observe that the x-nullcline is the x-bisector, while the y-nullcline and z-nullcline originate at states y = 1 and z = 1, respectively, pass through the interior rest point x∗ and hit the opposite edges of the simplex. Together the nullclines divide the simplex into six regions: x is decreasing in regions 1, 2, and 3, and increasing in regions 4, 5, and 6; y is 18 Formally,theIBRdynamicsinC2H(x,y,z)=0BBBBBBB@xyz1CCCCCCCA=0BBBBBBB@x(zy)(x2+y+z)y(xz)(x2+y+z)yz(x2xyxzyz)z(yx)(x2+y+z)+yz(x2xyxzyz)1CCCCCCCAhasthepropertyH(x,y,z)=H(x,z,y).ToidentifytheinteriorrestpointsofthesystemHobservethatx=0requiresz=y,sothatx=1yz=12y.Pluggingtheexpressionsforxandzintoy=0yieldstheequation16y+16y219y3=0,whichonlyhasonerooty⇡0.374intheinterval[0,1].Thusx⇤⇡(0.252,0.374,0.374)istheuniqueinteriorrestpointofthesystemH.Toshowthatthesolutiontrajectoriesoriginatingintheinteriorofthesimplexformclosedorbitsaroundtherestpointx⇤,wefirstshowthatanysuchsolutioncirclesaroundx⇤andthenapplythe"self-negating"propertytoconcludethatanycircularsolutiontrajectorymustbeindeedaclosedorbit.x=1y=1z=1x=0y=0z=0x⇤163425x=1y=1z=1x=0y=0z=0x⇤Figure4:Left:thenullclinesdividethesimplexinto6regions.Right:solutiontrajectoriesfromthemarkedpointshavetoremainwithintheredareas.Observethatthex-nullclineisthex-bisector,whilethey-nullclineandz-nullclineoriginateatstatesy=1andz=1,respectively,passthroughtheinteriorrestpointx⇤andhittheoppositeedgesofthesimplex.Togetherthenullclinesdividethesimplexintosixregions:xisdecreasinginregions1,2,and3,andincreasinginregions4,5,and6;yisdecreasingin3,4,and5,andincreasingin6,1,and2;zisdecreasinginregions5,6,and1,andincreasinginregions2,3,and4.Giventhesignsofthenullclines,thepossibledirectionsofmotionineachofthesixregionsarerestrictedtoaparticular60-degreewedge.Forinstance,inregion1,xandzmustbedecreasing,whileyisincreasing,soasolutionoriginatingfromapointinsideregion1canonlymovetowardtheboundaryz=0orthenullclinez=0.Butasthesolutiongetsclosertotheboundary,thespeedzapproaches0,whilethespeedsxandyareboundedawayfrom0withintheredareathatrestrictsthefeasibledirectionsofmotion(Formally,asz!0,x!xy(x2+y);y!xy(x2+y);z!0,soneartheedgez=0thedirectionofmotionisalmostparalleltotheedge.)Thusasolution -- 15 -- decreasing in 3, 4, and 5, and increasing in 6, 1, and 2; z is decreasing in regions 5, 6, and 1, and increasing in regions 2, 3, and 4. Given the signs of the nullclines, the possible directions of motion in each of the six regions are restricted to a particular 60-degree wedge. For instance, in region 1, x and z must be decreasing, while y is increasing, so a solution originating from a point inside region 1 can only move toward the boundary z = 0 or the nullcline z = 0. But as the solution gets closer to the boundary, the speed z approaches 0, while the speeds x and y are bounded away from 0 within the red area that restricts the feasible directions of motion (Formally, as z → 0, x → −xy(x2 + y); y → xy(x2 + y); z → 0, so near the edge z = 0 the direction of motion is almost parallel to the edge.) Thus a solution originating inside region 1 has to exit it via the z-nullcline. Similarly, the solutions originating in regions 3 and 5 have to escape them via the x- and the y-nullclines, correspondingly. Solutions originating in region 2 cannot reach the boundary as z must be increasing. But it is not immediately obvious that they cannot hit the rest point x∗. To exclude this possibility, one has to show that the y-component of every point in the region 2 is at least as high as the y-component of x∗, so that x∗ can not be reached as y must be increasing. This will be the case if the slope of the z-nullcline at x∗ is not lower than the slope of the line y = const. To compute that slope, simplify the system H to H(x, y, z) = x y z = x(z − y)(x2 + y + z) y(x − z)(x2 + y + z2) + 2xy2z z(y − x)(x2 + y2 + z) − 2xyz2 so that the equation for the z-nullcline becomes (y − x)(x2 + y2 + z) − 2xyz = 0. Using z = 1− x− y, apply the Implicit Function Theorem to compute the slope of the z-nullcline: dy dx = x2 + y2 + z − (y − x)(2x − 1) + 2yz − 2xy x2 + y2 + z + (y − x)(2y − 1) − 2xz + 2xy The rest point x∗ is characterized by z = y and x = 1 − 2y, so the slope of the z-nullcline at x∗ can be expressed solely in terms of y: dy dxx=x∗ = = (1 − 2y)2 + y2 + y + (3y − 1)(2y − 1) (1 − 2y)2 + y2 + y − (3y − 1)(1 − 4y) + 2y2 − 2y(1 − 2y) 23y2 − 12y + 2 11y2 − 8y + 2 > 0 Thus at the rest point x∗ the z-nullcline has a positive slope, whereas the slope of the line y = const is 0 (in standard coordinates). Therefore at any point in the interior of region 2, y > y(x∗), and the trajectories originating in that region have to escape it via the y-nullcline. 2 exceeds the Similarly, in region 4 the slope of the x-nullcline z − y = 0 equal to − 1 19 slope of the line z = const equal to −1, and in the region 6 the slope of the y-nullcline (x − z)(x2 + y + z2) + 2xyz = 0 is dy dx = −2 x2 + y + z2 + (x − z)2 + 2yz − 2xy x2 + y + z2 + (x − z)(1 − 2z) + 2xz − 2xy so that at x∗ it becomes dy dxx=x∗ = −2 17y2 − 10y + 2 11y2 − 8y + 2 < 0 whereas the line x = const is vertical. Hence the trajectories originating in both regions 4 and 6 have to escape them via the nullclines. Therefore the solution trajectory from any interior initial condition circles around the interior rest point x∗ by sequentially entering and exiting each of the six regions via the nullclines. Figure 5: The solution trajectory from x0 (blue) and the time-reversed solution trajectory from x0 (red). The final step of the proof is to show that every solution trajectory is a closed orbit. Since all trajectories circle around x∗, it suffices to consider a solution originating at some point x0 on the x-bisector between the rest point x∗ and the state x = 1. Suppose that once this solution completes a loop around the rest point, it hits the x-bisector again at some point x1, whereas if one were to reverse the flow it would hit the bisector at a point x−1. The "self-negating" property of C2 implies that the mirror image of the phase portrait of the negative of C2 is the phase portrait of C2 (the x-bisector being the axis of symmetry). In particular, the mirror image of the segment of the solution trajectory between x−1 and x0 has to be the segment between x0 and x1. Therefore x−1 = x1, but that is only possible if x−1 = x0 = x1, as otherwise x−1 and x1 must be on the opposite sides of x0. Therefore all solution trajectories must form closed orbits around x∗. (cid:3) 20 x=1y=1z=1x⇤x1x0x1Figure5:Thesolutiontrajectoryfromx0(blue)andthetime-reversedsolutiontrajectoryfromx0(red).x-bisectorbetweentherestpointx⇤andthestatex=1.Supposethatoncethissolutioncompletesalooparoundtherestpoint,ithitsthex-bisectoragainatsomepointx1,whereasifoneweretoreversetheflowitwouldhitthebisectoratapointx1.The"self-negating"propertyofC2impliesthatthemirrorimageofthephaseportraitofthenegativeofC2isthephaseportraitofC2(thex-bisectorbeingtheaxisofsymmetry).Inparticular,themirrorimageofthesegmentofthesolutiontrajectorybetweenx1andx0hastobethesegmentbetweenx0andx1.Thereforex1=x1,butthatisonlypossibleifx1=x0=x1,asotherwisex1andx1mustbeontheoppositesidesofx0.Thereforeallsolutiontrajectoriesmustformclosedorbitsaroundx⇤.⌅TheProposition4.3suggeststhatifathree-strategygamehasthe"self-negating"property,thesolutiontrajectoriesandthetime-reversedsolutiontrajectories"meet",whichimpliesthatthetrajectoriesformclosedorbitsaroundaninteriorsteadystate.Thisobservationprovidesalinkbetweenself-negatinggamesundertheIBRdynamicsandzero-sumgamesunderthereplicatordynamics,sinceinthelattercaseinteriorrestpointsalsocannotbeasymptoticallystable(AkinandLosert(1984)).However,ingameswithmorethanthreestrategiesonemightnotgetasmuchmileageoutofself-negation.Withonlythreestrategies,theself-negatingpropertyimpliesanaxisymmetricphaseportrait,sincetheremustbeapairofstrategiesthatisrelabeledwhentheorderofpayo↵sisreversed.Withfourormorestrategiesitispossiblethatmorethanonepairofstrategiesarerelabeled,anditisnotentirelyclearwhatthispossibilityimplies.5.OtherexamplesInthissectionweprovidetwomoreexamplesthatrelatetheIBRandthereplicatordynamics.First,weshowthatthegamefromtheexample1ofZeeman(1980)admitstwointeriorrestpointsundertheIBRdynamics.Suchbehaviorisimpossibleunderthereplicatordynamics,underwhichinnon-degenerategamestherecanbeatmostoneinteriorrestpoint(Theorem3inZeeman(1980)).ThisresultsuggeststhatundertheIBRdynamicstherearemoreclassesofgamedynamicsthanunderthereplicatordynamics.Second,weconstructaself-negatinggameinwhichtheinteriorissplitintotworegions,onecontainingclosedorbitsaroundtheinteriorrestpoint,andtheotherbeingabasinofattractionforapurerestpoint.Uptothepositionoftherestpoint,bothdynamicsareequivalent. -- 17 -- The Proposition 6 suggests that if a three-strategy game has the "self-negating" prop- erty, the solution trajectories and the time-reversed solution trajectories "meet", which implies that the trajectories form closed orbits around an interior steady state. This obser- vation provides a link between self-negating games under the IBR dynamics and zero-sum games under the replicator dynamics. In a zero-sum game with an interior equilibrium, every interior solution trajectory is confined to a level set of a Kullback-Leibler divergence function (see Sec. 9.1.1 of Sandholm (2010)). This means the rest point is Lyapunov stable but not asymptotically stable, and that other interior solution trajectories do not converge. The latter need not be the case under the IBR dynamics: game W in Example 5 is a self-negating game, in which some interior solution trajectories form closed orbits, while others converge to a pure rest point. In games with more than three strategies one might not get as much mileage out of self- negation. With only three strategies, the self-negating property implies an axisymmetric phase portrait, since there must be a pair of strategies that is relabeled when the order of payoffs is reversed. With four or more strategies it is possible that more than one pair of strategies are relabeled, and it is not entirely clear what this possibility implies. 5 Other examples In this section we provide two more examples that relate the IBR and the replicator dynamics. First, we show that the game from the example 1 of Zeeman (1980) admits two interior rest points under the IBR dynamics. Such behavior is impossible under the replicator dynamics, under which in non-degenerate games there can be at most one interior rest point (Theorem 3 in Zeeman (1980)). Second, we construct a self-negating game in which the interior is split into two regions, one containing closed orbits around the interior rest point, and the other being a basin of attraction for a pure rest point. Up to the position of the rest point, both dynamics are equivalent. Example 5. Consider the games Z and W: Game Z is the game from the Example 1 in Zeeman (1980). The IBR dynamics in it 0 1 3 4 3 2 W = 3 5 6  -4 5 0  6 0 3 0 -3 -1 Z = x = x(1 − x)(cid:16)x2 + y − z(cid:17) − 2x2yz y = −y(1 − y)(cid:16)x + y2 − z(cid:17) + 2x2yz z = z(x − y)(cid:16)z − x2 − y2(cid:17) 21 yields two distinct interior rest points z1 = ( 1 relevant eigenvalues are 1 are 0.41 and -0.041, so it is unstable. 27(cid:16)−1 ± 2i√5(cid:17), so this rest point is stable, whereas at z2 the eigenvalues 3) and z2 ≈ (0.575, 0.088, 0.338). At z1 the 3 , 1 3 , 1 Figure 6: Some solution trajectories in games Z (left) and W (right). Game W has the self-negating property, so there are closed orbits around the interior rest point, but a part of the interior of the simplex is the basin of attraction of the state x3 = 1. In the time-reversed game x1 = 1 becomes the attractor, while the interior rest point preserves its region with the closed orbits. 6 Conclusion This paper investigated the properties of an imitative rule that ignores any cardinal information about the game's payoffs. Agents switch to strategies which they perceive as better based on the comparison of their realized payoffs to that of a random member of the population. Since this behavioral rule bears a similarity to the pairwise proportional imitation of Schlag (1998), the resulting ordinal imitative dynamics begs comparison with the replicator dynamics arising from the PPI. We demonstrate that while the IBR dynamics does not possess the payoff monotonicity and Nash stationarity properties of the replicator dynamics in general, the two dynamics are topologically equivalent in two-strategy games. We also conjecture that they generate the same types of behavior in Rock-Paper-Scissors games. In other cases, the IBR dynamics can generate behavior that is impossible under the replicator dynamics. Better understanding the relationship between the two dynamics and investigating the self-negating property in games with more than three strategies would be the two most important directions for future research. 22 References Benaım, M. and Weibull, J. W. (2003). Deterministic approximation of stochastic evolution in games. Econometrica, 71:873 -- 903. Bjornerstedt, J. and Weibull, J. W. (1996). Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation. In Arrow, K. J. et al., editors, The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, pages 155 -- 181. St. Martin's Press, New York. Helbing, D. (1992). A mathematical model for behavioral changes by pair interactions. In Haag, G., Mueller, U., and Troitzsch, K. G., editors, Economic Evolution and Demographic Change: Formal Models in Social Sciences, pages 330 -- 348. Springer, Berlin. Hofbauer, J. (1995). Imitation dynamics for games. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vienna. Hofbauer, J. and Sandholm, W. H. (2011). Survival of dominated strategies under evolu- tionary dynamics. Theoretical Economics, 6:341 -- 377. Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., and Sandholm, W. H. (2018). Evodyn-3s: A mathe- matica computable document to analyse evolutionary dynamics in 3-strategy games. Unpublished manuscript. Izquierdo, S. S. and Izquierdo, L. R. (2013). Stochastic approximation to understand simple simulation models. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151(1):254 -- 276. Nachbar, J. H. (1990). 'Evolutionary' selection dynamics in games: Convergence and limit properties. International Journal of Game Theory, 19:59 -- 89. Samuelson, L. and Zhang, J. (1992). Evolutionary stability in asymmetric games. Journal of Economic Theory, 57:363 -- 391. Sandholm, W. H. (2010). Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Schlag, K. H. (1998). Why imitate, and if so, how? A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. Journal of Economic Theory, 78:130 -- 156. Viossat, Y. (2015). Evolutionary dynamics and dominated strategies. Economic Theory Bulletin, 3:91 -- 113. Weibull, J. W. (1995). Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge. Zeeman, E. C. (1980). Population dynamics from game theory. In Nitecki, Z. and Robin- son, C., editors, Global Theory of Dynamical Systems, pages 471 -- 497, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 23
1903.09867	1	1903	2019-03-23T19:00:00	An interim core for normal form games and exchange economies with incomplete information: a correction	[ "econ.TH" ]	We consider the interim core of normal form cooperative games and exchange economies with incomplete information based on the partition model. We develop a solution concept that we can situate roughly between Wilson's coarse core and Yannelis's private core. We investigate the interim negotiation of contracts and address the two situations of contract delivery: interim and ex post. Our solution differs from Wilson's concept because the measurability of strategies in our solution is postponed until the consumption date (assumed with respect to the information that will be known by the players at the consumption date). For interim consumption, our concept differs from Yannelis's private core because players can negotiate conditional on proper common knowledge events in our solution, which strengthens the interim aspect of the game, as we will illustrate with examples.	econ.TH	econ	An interim core for normal form games and exchange economies with incomplete information: a correction.∗ Y. Askoura March 26, 2019 LEMMA, Universit´e Panth´eon-Assas, Paris II, 4 rue Blaise Desgoffe, 75006 Paris. email : [email protected] Abstract We consider the interim core of normal form cooperative games and exchange economies with incomplete information based on the partition model. We develop a solution concept that we can situate roughly between Wilson's coarse core and Yannelis's private core. We investigate the interim negotiation of contracts and address the two situations of contract delivery : interim and ex post. Our solution differs from Wilson's concept because the measurability of strategies in our solution is postponed until the consumption date (assumed with respect to the information that will be known by the players at the consumption date). For interim consumption, our concept differs from Yannelis's private core because players can negotiate conditional on proper common knowledge events in our solution, which strengthens the interim aspect of the game, as we will illustrate with examples. keywords : coarse core; fine core; private core; α-core; weak-core; incomplete information; exchange economies; partition model. JEL Classification codes : C02; C71. 1 Introduction We define and investigate an interim core concept for normal form games with incomplete information. We focus on the weak-core [Weber, 1981], which is a slight modification of the α-core of normal form games [Aumann, 1961, Scarf, 1971, Kajii, 1992] and the core of exchange economies as initiated by Radner [1968]. The incomplete information aspect is modeled using Wilson's [Wilson, 1978] partition model. Specifically, we associate to each player a σ−field representing the events that the particular player can discern. ∗This is an amended version of the original paper with the same title published in : Journal of Mathe- matical Economics 58(2015); 38-45. 1 Wilson [1978] defined two concepts of the core that targeted two extreme situations: in the coarse core concept, agents are not permitted to share their information, whereas in the fine core concept, agents share all their information within coalitions. Wilson [1978] obtained the non-emptiness of the coarse core by endowing the grand coalition with the particular power of sharing all its agents' information, while proper coalitions do not share any information and negotiate only over "common knowledge" events. The incoherence of this particular construction has been criticized in the literature, which has spawned alternative models. Several interesting studies have been undertaken based on Wilson's solution concepts. Allen [1996] provided an overview of the basic literature concerning exchange economies and cooperative games. Yannelis [1991] defined the private core, in which agents do not share their private information. Part of the incomplete information aspect of the private core and other types of models is represented by assuming that agents can only envision strategies that are measurable with respect to the σ-fields of events that they can dis- cern, which amounts to assuming that contract delivery is situated at the interim stage. Koutsougeras and Yannelis [1993] investigated the incentive compatibility of core concepts under incomplete information. The incentive compatibility problem arises when the pre- vailing state of nature is not publicly known prior to consumption or contract delivery. The investigation of the private core was further undertaken by Glycopantis et al. [2001] and Allen and Yannelis [2001]. Page [1997] formulated a common treatment and proved the non-emptiness of the core for a unified model that can be reduced to some version of Wil- son's coarse and fine cores1 and Yannelis's private core as a function of information-sharing rule. Serfes [2001] extends the private core to dynamic economies and defines a non-myopic core. Additional information on this subject, incentive problems and a cogent mathemat- ical formulation of the problem of information sharing is provided in Allen [2006]. For a review of the alternative approach (in incomplete information games), Harsanyi's model [Harsanyi, 1967], we refer to the survey of Forges et al. [2002]. In this paper, we formulate an interim core concept in which players negotiate with interim utilities (conditional expectations) and can object to a status-quo allocation (strategy) for common knowledge events. The main difference between our concept and Wilson's con- cepts is that the measurability of strategies is not related to the information available at the negotiation date but to the information that will be known by the players at the con- sumption date. This modelling idea is more natural and lends consistency to the resulting concepts. Moreover, it solves the incoherence problem in Wilson's construction. From this perspective, players faces all circumstances that will be known just before contract delivery. In other words, they can envision strategies based on the information that will be received before consumption, and are not restricted to using strategies conceivable under the infor- mation known during the negotiation stage. Negotiation is conducted using the available 1Indeed, Page [1997] used ex ante utilities, whereas in each of Wilson's coarse and fine cores, agents evaluate allocations based on possibly proper events that are smaller than the entire universe. 2 information, but strategies can be based on all information that will be known-even future information-before consumption. If consumption is situated at the interim stage (no additional information between ne- gotiation and consumption), then our concept is close to Yannelis's private core, except that the negotiation is conducted on proper common knowledge events. Compared with the private core2, this strengthens the interim aspect of the model, as we will show with examples in Section 3.2. We address two situations, i.e., whether the prevailing state of nature is revealed at the consumption date or whether it is not. The weak-core of a normal form game and the core of an exchange economy are addressed in each case. Note that Askoura et al. [2013] and Noguchi [2014] provide an ex ante formulation of the α−core, under Harsanyi's model. This paper is divided into two main parts : Section 2 is devoted to ex post contract delivery and contains most of the notation and technical tools that we use. Section 3 is devoted to interim contract delivery and concludes with a subsection comparing our concept to the private core. Section 4 contains a closing comment on information sharing. 2 Ex post contract delivery In an incomplete information model, two important aspects must be considered : (a) at what stage are negotiations made, ex ante or interim?3 and (b) at what stage is contract delivery made, ex ante, interim or ex post? For (a), this paper discusses the interim case. For (b), two consumption dates, interim and ex post, are addressed. The interim consumption is technically accounted for by the assumption of the measurability of players' strategies, which can be roughly addressed by acknowledging that players can only envision strategies that are measurable with respect to their respective σ-fields4. Then, this assumption is related to conditions under which the game takes place. For instance, it is unnecessary if the prevailing state (or, generally, a finer σ−field than all players' information σ-fields) is revealed before contract delivery, and it is necessary otherwise. In other words, if contract delivery is made at the ex post stage, the measurability condition can be relaxed, such as is the case in Volij [2000], in which the agents' utilities are updated again following the information that agents possess at the negotiation step. Volij [2000] obtained an intermediate core concept between the coarse and the fine core of Wilson. In Okada [2012], a new type of core (informational core) was introduced in which the measurability assumption is no longer required. In Kobayashi [1980], measurability was assumed with respect to a σ-field that will be revealed before contract delivery and a conditional core was introduced. In this section, consumption is organized ex-post. 2This comment may be put in some perspective by the version of the private core defined in Hahn and Yannelis [2001] and in De Castro et al. [2011] as a weak interim private core. See point 2 in Section 3.2 for a discussion of this concept : in particular, it may fail to be nonempty under usual assumptions. 3The ex post situation corresponds to complete information. 4Alternatively, new σ−fields are generally defined by the information sharing rule. 3 2.1 Conceptual aspects-Normal form games Let (Ω, F , µ) be a probability space. Ω represents the set of states of nature. The prob- ability µ is a common objective prior. In the sequel, two events with a µ-null symmetric difference will be confused. N = {1, ..., n} is the set of players. If S ⊂ N is a coalition, then we denote by −S the coalition of the remaining players. The action space of player i is denoted Ai. It is assumed to be a compact convex subset of a (separable) reflexive Banach space Xi. The σ−algebra B(Ai) stands for the Borel σ−field of Ai. Set A = Qi∈N Ai. The information of each player i is represented by a sub-σ-algebra Fi of F . The elements of Fi represent the events that player i can discern. In other words, for every E ∈ Fi, player i knows whether the prevailing state is in E or in its complement, which is denoted ∁E. Wilson [1978] defined the fine core to be the core concept corresponding to the situation in which agents within a coalition S pool all their information. Then, they can discern all events in the coarsest sub-σ-algebra generated by ∪ Fi. Analogously, Wilson's coarse core is that in which agents do i∈S not reveal their information within coalitions or use common knowledge events or events contained therein for a coalition S in the field ∩ i∈S Fi, which is denoted ∨ i∈S Fi, which is denoted ∧ i∈S Fi. R1) Assume that there is a finite partition of Ω generating the σ-algebra ∨ i∈N Fi; then, every sub-σ-field Fi is generated by a partition of Ω. Denote by P the coarsest partition generating the field ∨ Fi. Denote by Pi the coarsest partition of Ω generating Fi. i∈N We can assume that µ(K) > 0 for all K ∈ Pi. The elements of Pi are the finest events that can be discerned by player i without sharing information with other players. Observe that for every K ∈ P, there is a unique Ki ∈ Pi such that K ⊂ Ki. Each agent i ∈ N is assumed to know, before the negotiation date, the smallest (finest) event (an element of Pi) in his field Fi containing the realized state of nature5. For each player i, associate a utility function In the sequel, we assume that ui : A × Ω → IR+ • the information fields Fi, i ∈ I, and the other components of the game are publicly known. For a player, knowing the whole structure of the information, that is, all the fields Fi, i ∈ N, does not provide him with more information if he is only assumed to discern, in his own field, whether any event contains the prevailing state. Player i's strategy6, xi, is a function from Ω into his space of actions7. The measurability condition requires that xi be measurable with respect to the σ−field containing the events 5This is only true in the case in which Fi is generated by a partition of Ω, as assumed above; otherwise, at this stage, player i can only know whether the realized state is in E or in ∁E, for all E ∈ Fi. 6Allocation in the case of exchange economies. 7Consumption set in the case of an exchange economy. 4 that player i can discern. For instance, this function must be Fi-measurable in the absence of information sharing or, for example, ∨ Fj-measurable if i belongs to the coalition S j∈S and S shares all its members' information. We consider the measurability condition by distinguishing two situations : • If the prevailing state of nature is not known before consumption takes place (contract delivery), then it is reasonable to assume the measurability condition. Without information sharing, this condition means that player i plays a constant function in every set Ki ∈ Pi. As i can only distinguish an event Ki ∈ Pi containing the prevailing state and the consumption takes place at this step, i.e. before the exact prevailing state is revealed, i plays a unique action, regardless of the exact realized w ∈ Ki, by seeking to maximize his mathematical expectation computed on Ki. • If the prevailing state of nature is known before consumption occurs, we can withdraw this measurability condition. Indeed, if each player knows the prevailing state at the consumption date, then he plays the action corresponding to the image of his strategy at this realized state8. In this setting, the measurability condition is intimately related to the incentive com- patibility problem. In other words, these two conditions are to be assumed or ignored simultaneously following the situation we consider. In this section, we consider the situation in which C1) the realized state is known before consumption takes place8. Thus, we do not require the incentive compatibility of solutions nor the measurability condition. C2) All strategies are assumed to be F -measurable. Remark 1. If only the information carried by a σ-field H such that F ⊃ H ⊃ ∨ i∈N Fi is revealed (the realized events of H) before consumption, then it is reasonable to assume the measurability of all strategies with respect to H. However, in this case, it is mathematically possible to modify the data of the game to withdraw this measurability condition (with respect to H instead of F ) by considering the game issued from the probability space (Ω, H, µH). The game takes place as follows : At a given date, players receive their own private in- formation that makes them able to recognize whether any set (only) in their own field contains the prevailing state. Following this date, players negotiate. They can form coali- tions9 at this stage. At the end of this step, the true realized state is revealed. Thereafter, consumption (or contract delivery) takes place. 8Assuming that the whole information field F allows precise knowledge of the exact realized state of nature. 9The information-sharing role must be clarified in the negotiation process. Precisely, a player can either reveal his information to his coalition or not. 5 The set of strategies AS of a coalition S is an S-tuple of F -measurable functions xi : Ω → Ai, i ∈ S. The set of strategies of the grand coalition AN is sometimes denoted simply L1(Ω, µ, Xi) that is by A. For each coalition S ⊆ N, AS is considered as a subset of Qi∈S endowed with the product of the weak topologies σ(L1(µ, Xi), L∞(µ, X ∗ i )). The L1 spaces here stand for the spaces of Bochner integrable functions. The separability of the sets Ai makes the strong measurability identical to Borel measurability (the image spaces Ai are endowed with the Borel σ-field). For this reason we confuse these notions. Note that the sets AS are weakly compact [Diestel et al., 1993, Ulger, 1991]. Associate to every player i the utility Ui defined on A by Assume that Ui(x)w = ui(x(w), w) • for every i, ui is B(A) ⊗ F -measurable and supa∈A ui(a, ·) is integrably bounded. Denote the described game by G = ((Ω, F , µ), N, Ai, ui, Fi) In this paper, until section 4, we assume that C3) Information is not shared within coalitions. Then, every player i must evaluate his expected payoff with respect to the conditional expectation defined for x ∈ A by : E(Ui(x)Fi) : Ω → IR Indeed, player i can only know whether a particular event of Fi may contain the prevailing state at the decision (negotiation) step. Definition 1. A coalition S blocks a given strategy x ∈ A, if there exists a common- knowledge event F ∈ ∧ Fi, and if the exists ε > 0 and if S possesses an admissible i∈S strategy yS ∈ AS, such that for all y−S ∈ A−S, E(Ui(yS, y−S)Fi)w > E(Ui(x)Fi)w+ε, for a.e. w ∈ F, ∀i ∈ S In such a circumstance, we also posit that S blocks x on F . The interim core of G is the set of non-blocked strategies. Remark 2. The concept defined above reduces to an ex ante core if all of the informa- tion fields are trivial Fi = {∅, Ω}. Indeed, players evaluate strategies with respect to the mathematical expectation E(Ui(x)) = RΩ ui(x(w), w)dµ. 6 The previous definition is a generalization of the Weber's [Weber, 1981] weak-core which can be adapted for games with a finite set of players as follows. Definition 2. Consider a game (N, Yi, hi, i ∈ N ) where N is a finite set of players, Yi the set of strategies of i ∈ N, and hi : Y = Qi∈N Yi → IR the utility of i ∈ N. A coalition S ⊂ N is said to block y ∈ Y iff it possesses a strategy xS ∈ YS, and there exists ε > 0 such that, hi(xS, x−S) > hi(y) + ε, ∀x−S ∈ X−S, ∀i ∈ S. The weak-core is the set of non blocked strategies. By removing ε in the previous definition, we obtain, the α-core of Aumann [1961]. The non-emptiness of the interim core for normal form games is shown in the following : Theorem 1. Assume that each ui is concave and upper-semicontinuous in its first argu- ment, then the interim core of G is nonempty. Proof. Following the idea of Wilson [1978], associate to G a new game G′ defined as follows : the set of players is (i, K), i ∈ N, K ∈ Pi. Denote by J the new set of indices. The set of strategies of j = (i, K) is Yj = L1(Ω, µ, Ai).χK, where χK is the characteristic function of K. Note that the sets Yj are weakly compact. Set Y = Qj∈J Yj and define the linear function (isomorphism) L : Y → A by x = L(y), xi = PK∈Pi y(i,K). Associate to each player j = (i, K) the utility gj defined for y ∈ Y by gj(y) = ZK ui(L(y)(w), w)dµ = µ(K)E(Ui(L(y))Fi)v, ∀v ∈ K The set of admissible coalitions consists of subsets S ⊂ J associated to pairs (S0, F ) consisting of a coalition S0 ⊂ N of the initial game and a common knowledge event Fk as (S0, F ) = {(i, K) : i ∈ S0; K ∈ Pi and K ⊂ F }. The weak-core of G′ is the F ∈ ∧ k∈S0 set of strategies y that are not blocked by an admissible coalition. It is clear that if y is in the weak-core of G′, then L(y) is in the interim core of G. Note that in Definition 1, the functions E(Ui(yS, y−S)Fi) and E(Ui(x)Fi), i ∈ S, depend only on the restrictions of (yS, y−S) and x to F , i.e., on (yS, y−S)F and xF . We now check the routine regularity assumptions needed for the components of G′. Let us prove that for every j = (i, K) ∈ J, gj is upper semi-continuous and concave on Y . The concavity of gj results trivially from the concavity of ui in its first argument. Let us prove that gj is upper semi-continuous on Y . Following the Eberlein-Smulian theorem, as we are working in a weakly compact space (note that a finite product of weakly compact sets is weakly compact), we can use sequences instead of nets to describe the closure of subsets and, consequently, to also describe the upper semi-continuity of real functions. Let yn converge weakly to y. Without loss of generality, consider a subsequence still denoted yn such that lim gj(yn) = lim sup gj(yn). The existence of the sup-bound of gj is ensured because supa ui(a, ·) is integrably bounded. Following Diestel et al. [1993], there is a sequence hn ∈ co{yk : k ≥ n} such that hn converges a.e. to y, and hence L(hn) also converges a.e. to L(y). Then, from the upper 7 semicontinuity of ui, for a.e. w ∈ Ω, lim sup ui(L(hn)(w), w) ≤ ui(L(y)(w), w). Hence, by Fatou's Lemma : lim sup gj(hn) ≤ ZK lim sup ui(L(hn)(w), w)dµ ≤ ZK ui(L(y)(w), w)dµ From the concavity of ui, for every n ∈ IN, there is k ≥ n such that gj(hn) ≥ gj(yk). It follows that lim sup gj(yn) ≤ gj(y) This proves the upper semi-continuity of the functions gj. Associate the characteristic function form game GC = (V, J), where the value function V is defined by : V (S) = (cid:26) v ∈ IRJ : there is yS ∈ YS such that for all y−S ∈ Y−S gj(yS, y−S) ≥ vj, for every j ∈ S (cid:27) − × IRJ\S. on every coalition S that is admissible for G′. For the other types of coalitions, simply let V (S) = IRS It is obvious that to an element v of the core of GC corresponds an element in the weak- core of G′. It is precisely an element y ∈ Y such that the grand coalition (admissible since it is associated to (N, Ω)) can ensure at least the gains vj at y for its members, where v is Indeed, let v in the core of GC and y ∈ Y , such that gj(y) ≥ vj for all in the core of GC. j ∈ J. Hence, if an admissible coalition S blocks y for the blocking concept of definition 2, then there exists ε > 0 and xS ∈ YS such that gj(xS, x−S) > gj(y) + ε ≥ vj + ε, for all j ∈ S and all x−S ∈ Y−S. By construction of V (S), v belongs to the interior of V (S) and then, this is a contradiction with the fact that v is in the core of GC. Note that if gj does not depend on y−j, for every j ∈ J, (this is the case of exchange economies in absence of externalities) then the previous argument works for the α−core blocking concept, i.e., without the need of the ε > 0. For non-vacuity, Let us apply the result of Scarf [1967] that guarantee the existence of an element in the core of GC under the following conditions : 1) V (S) is closed and nonempty for every S ⊂ J and V (J) is bounded from above, 2) V (S) is comprehensive for every S ⊂ J, i.e., if v ∈ V (S) and v′ ≤ v (coordinatewise), then v′ ∈ V (S), 3) GC is balanced, that is, for every balanced collection of coalitions S with positive balancing weights δS, S ∈ S , one has ∩S∈S V (S) ⊂ V (J) where the collection of coalitions S , with associated positive (balancing) weights δS, S ∈ S , is said to be balanced precisely when XS∈S ,S∋j δS = 1, ∀j ∈ J 8 The verification of 1) and 2) is easy. Indeed, 1) follows from the positivity, upper semi- continuity of the functions gj and the compactness of the strategy sets, and 2) is trivial from the definition of the sets V (S). For 3), we apply an adapted Scarf trick [Scarf, 1971]. Take a balanced collection S with associated positive balancing weights δS, S ∈ S , and v ∈ ∩S∈S V (S). For every S ∈ S , let yS ∈ YS such that gj(yS, y−S) ≥ vj for every j ∈ S and y−S ∈ Y−S. If S is non-admissible, then yS can be taken arbitrarily because of the δSyS j . positivity of the functions ui. Let the element y = (y1, ..., yJ) defined by yj = PS∈S ,S∋j Then, y ∈ Y by convexity and for any fixed j ∈ J, y can be expressed as y = XS∈C ,S∋j where hS m ∈ Ym is defined by αS(hS 1 , ..., hS J) hS m(w) =   yS m(w), if m ∈ S, δCyC m(w) PC∋m,C6∋j , if m /∈ S. δC PC∋m,C6∋j where the last summations (and all of the following) are made, if not stated otherwise, over the coalitions C (or S) belonging to S . Indeed, for every m, XS∈C ,S∋j δShS m = XS∋j,S∋m δSyS m + XS∋j,S6∋m δS PC∋m,C6∋j PC∋m,C6∋j δCyC m . δC To conclude that the previous quantity yields ym, it suffices to remark that XS∋j,S6∋m δS = XC∋m,C6∋j δC, which is a consequence of the balancedness of the collection of coalitions : 1 = XS∋j δS = XS∋j,S6∋m δS + XS∋m,S∋j δS = XC∋m,C6∋j δC + XS∋m,S∋j δS = XC∋m δC = 1. Now with the help of the concavity of gj, we obtain δS(hS 1 , ..., hS J) δS(yS, hS −S)) gj(y1, ..., yJ) = gj(XS∋j = gj(XS∋j ≥ vj 9 This establishes the balancedness of GC, and consequently the non-vacuity of its core, and then that of the weak-core of G′. Take any y in the weak-core of G′. Obviously, L(y) is in the interim core of the initial game. 2.2 Interim core for exchange economies In this section, we apply the above interim core concept for exchange economies. The difference with respect to normal form games is that we do not require externalities in player payoffs and the strategy sets are constrained. Most of the hypotheses considered above remain unchanged. We address only those new hypotheses related to exchange economies and, if not expressly stated, we use the previous conditions. For exchange economies, define the consumption set of player i by Ci = IRl + for all i ∈ N, where l is a positive integer. For every i ∈ N, let ei : Ω → Ci be the initial endowment of agent i. Assume that ei is F -measurable. Note that this condition implies that players do not precisely know their initial endowments at the interim negotiation step. However, this information will be available at ex post contract delivery. In contrast with the previous paragraph, allocations are subject to constraints. The set of admissible allocations CS of a coalition S ⊆ N is an S-tuple of F -measurable functions xi : Ω → Ci, i ∈ S, such that Pi∈S xi(w) = Pi∈S ei(w) for a.e w ∈ Ω. Assume that • the initial endowments ei belong respectively to L1(Ω, µ, Ci), i.e., they are µ-integrable. Denote by Pi(C ) the projection of C = CN on L1(Ω, µ, Ci) and note that Pi(C ) contains all of the projections of the sets CS on L1(Ω, µ, Ci). The µ-integrability of the initial endowments makes the sets CS and the sets Pi(C ) weakly compact as we show in the following : Lemma 1. Under the condition of the integrability of ei, i ∈ N, the spaces CS, S ⊂ N, and the projections Pi(C ) of C on L1(Ω, µ, Ci) are weakly compact. Proof. For a.e. w ∈ Ω, for all S ⊆ N, all x ∈ CS satisfies xi(w) ∈ {y ∈ IRl + : 0 ≤ y ≤ ej(w)}, and this last set is compact in IRl. Furthermore, Pj∈S RE kxkSldµ = Pi∈SRE kxikldµ ejkldµ ≤ Pi∈SRE kPj∈N ≤ SPj∈NRE kejkldµ µ(E)→0 −→ 0 where k.kSl stands for the sum of the Euclidean norms k.kl on the factor spaces IRl. That is, CS is pointwise bounded and uniformly integrable. As it is obviously weakly closed, it 10 follows from Corollary 9 in Ulger [1991] that it is weakly compact. The weak compactness of the sets Pi(C ) results from the continuity of the corresponding projections. For exchange economies, externalities are not considered, and the utility of player i thus depends only on xi and w. To clarify a difference, denote it as Assume that ψi : Ci × Ω → IR+ • for every i, ψi is B(Ci) ⊗ F -measurable and supai∈Ci ψi(ai, ·) is integrably bounded. The other changes are analogous; thus another utility Ψi, defined on L1(Ω, µ, Ci) by Ψi(xi)w = ψi(xi(w), w), is associated to each player. In the absence of information sharing, the conditional expectation of player i is defined by E(Ψi(xi)Fi). Denote the described exchange economy by E = ((Ω, F , µ), N, Ci, ψi, Fi, ei) Definition 3. A coalition S blocks a given strategy x ∈ C , if there exists a common- Fi, and if S possesses an admissible strategy yS ∈ CS, such that, knowledge event F ∈ ∧ i∈S E(Ψi(yS i )Fi)w > E(Ψi(xi)Fi)w, for a.e. w ∈ F, ∀i ∈ S In such a circumstance, we also posit that S blocks x on F . The interim core of E is the set of non-blocked strategies. Theorem 2. Assume that each ψi is concave and upper-semicontinuous in its first argu- ment, then the interim core of E is nonempty. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 1, except for the following : the initial endowments of the players j = (i, K) in the new game (exchange economy), which we can denote here E ′, defined at the beginning, are defined by ej = eiχK. Set Yj = L1(Ω, µ, Ci)χK. The set of admissible allocations for a coalition S in E ′ is defined by C ′ yS j = S = {yS ∈ Qj∈S Yj : Pj∈S ej a.e.}. The weak compactness of these sets is shown in the previous Lemma. The upper semi-continuity of the functions gj may be shown analogously on the weak compact sets Pj(C ′). Pj∈S δSyS j (needed for the balanced- ness of the associated characteristic form game GC) must be checked for the grand coalition The admissibility of the combination y defined by yj = PS∋j ej(w) = Pi∈N as follows : observe first that for a.e. w ∈ Ω, Pj∈J δSXj∈S j = XS∈S yj = Xj∈J XS∈S ,S∋j j = XS∈S δSXj∈S Xj∈J δSyS yS ei(w). Then a.e. ej = Xj∈J XS∈S ,S∋j δSej = Xj∈J ej 11 This formula establishes that y is admissible. The fact that gj(yj) ≥ vj, for every j, results from the concavity of the functions gj. The balancedness of GC results immediately. Indeed, thanks to the absence of externalities, we do not need the second calculation δShS. Thanks to the absence of externalities an element of the presenting, for j, y = PS∋j core of GC provides directly an element in the α−core of E ′ (there is no need to use the ε-approximation, as mentioned in the previous proof) and then an element in the interim core of E. For further details on this proof, please refer to the detailed proof of Theorem 4 in the next section. 3 Interim contract delivery In this section, we consider the situation in which the realized state is not known prior to consumption. Our aim is to establish the results of the previous section in this setting. The game is organized as follows: at a given date, players receive their own private infor- mation that makes them able to recognize whether any set, only in their own field, contains the prevailing state. After this date, players negotiate, and they can form coalitions at this step. After the negotiation step, but still in the interim stage, contract delivery takes place. The true state is not revealed before consumption. Therefore, assume the • Honest reporting hypothesis. This hypothesis is required for contract delivery. It means that agents do not misreport their realized events to improve their utilities at contract delivery. As the forthcoming solution concept is close to the private core concept, let us underline that some versions of the private core are known to be incentive compatible (Koutsougeras and Yannelis [1993], Hahn and Yannelis [2001]; see also Hahn and Yannelis [1997] on this subject). Let us also underline that some new cores that have been recently defined [De Castro et al., 2011] using ambiguity theory ingredients are also incentive compatible. In this paper, we have adopted an objective common belief governing the states of nature. Then, (conditional) expected utilities seem more appropriate. Even if the above interim core concept may be formulated successfully in the setting with ambiguity aversion, the techniques as elaborated thus far [De Castro et al., 2011, Angelopoulos and Koutsougeras, 2015] cannot contribute, in our view, to the study of incentive problems in our case. Indeed, the tractability of the interim focusing of the concept may be difficult even with these new tools. Aside from the existence of many incentive compatibility concepts, this problem may be difficult to address and may involve restrictive conditions (monotonicity and continuity). For now, assume that there is a well-informed authority that may guarantee the applicability of the negotiated contracts. Assume all the hypotheses of subsection 2.1, except C1) and C2). We instead assume the opposite of C1), and below we describe strategy sets as a substitution for C2). 12 The set of strategies MS of a coalition S is an S-tuple of functions xi : Ω → Ai, i ∈ S, such that xi is Fi-measurable for each i ∈ S. The set of strategies of the grand coalition MN is occasionally denoted simply by M. For each coalition S ⊆ N, MS is considered L1(Ω, µ, Ai) endowed with the L1 norm topology. Note that condition to be a subset of Qi∈S R1) on the existence of finite partitions generating player information fields together with the measurability of player strategies with respect to their sub-σ-fields render the sets of strategies of finite dimensions. Then, the weak and norm topologies coincide on these sets and make them obviously compact. Further recall that the measurability condition assumed on strategies means that : without any other information regarding the realized state, player i plays a constant function in each K ∈ Pi, which is a meaningful condition because the consumption occurs at the interim stage. In fact, player i knows only the smallest event K ∈ Pi containing the prevailing state of the world. Define the game just described in which consumption is interim by GI = ((Ω, F , µ), N, Ai, ui, Fi) The blocking concept and the interim core are defined similarly by replacing in definition 1 : A with M, AS with MS, A−S with M−S and G with GI. Theorem 3. Assume that each ui is concave and upper-semicontinuous in its first argu- ment, then the interim core of GI is nonempty. The proof is omitted because it is similar to that of theorem 1, except that the set of strategies Yj, for j = (i, K), must be set as Yj = AiχK. 3.1 Exchange economies We consider here an exchange economy. Thus, consider the hypotheses of subsection 2.2. As above, we address in the sequel only the necessary changes related to the measurability assumption. • ei : Ω → Ci is the initial endowment of player i ∈ N, ei is assumed to be Fi- measurable. This condition means that players know their initial endowments at the interim stage. As in section 2.2, no externalities are assumed on payoffs with respect to strategies; thus denote ψi : Ci × Ω → IR+ as the utility of player i, and associate to i the second utility Ψi analogously. The set of allocations TS of a coalition S is an S-tuple of functions xi : Ω → Ci, i ∈ S, The set of allocations of the grand coalition TN is occasionally denoted simply by T . For L1(Ω, µ, Ci) endowed with the such that xi is Fi-measurable for each i ∈ S and Pi∈S xi(w) = Pi∈S ei(w) for a.e. w ∈ Ω. each coalition S ⊆ N, TS is considered to be a subset of Qi∈S L1 norm topology. 13 Denote by EI = ((Ω, F , µ), N, Ci, ψi, Fi, ei) an exchange economy with incomplete information in which the consumption is organized at the interim stage. The blocking concept and the interim core for EI are defined similarly by replacing, in the definition 3, C with T , CS with TS, E with EI. Theorem 4. Assume that each ψi is concave and upper-semicontinuous in its first argu- ment, then the interim core of EI is nonempty. As the proof of the analogous Theorem 2 is not detailed, we choose to provide the integral proof of this theorem for the reader's convenience. Proof. Following the idea of Wilson [1978], we begin by associating a new game (economy), denoted E ′, defined as follows : the set of players is (i, K), i ∈ N, K ∈ Pi. Denote by J the new set of indices. The consumption set of j = (i, K) is Yj = IRl +χK, where χK is the characteristic function of K. Set Y = Qj∈J Yj. Observe that Y is of finite dimension, and consequently, the L1 norm on the set of allocations of players L1(Ω, µ, Ci) induces a norm equivalent to the esssup norm on the corresponding sets Yj. The initial endowment of j = (i, K) is e′ j = eiχK. The admissible set of allocations for a coalition S is T ′ S is compact for every S; it is in fact of finite dimension, bounded and closed, as an intersection of a closed set with an inverse image of a singleton by a linear map. Define the linear function S = {yS = (yj)j∈S : Pj∈S yj = Pj∈S e′ j a.e. and yj ∈ Yj}. Clearly, T ′ L : Y → Qi∈N L1(Ω, µ, Ci) by x = L(y), xi = PK∈Pi y(i,K). Observe that for a.e. w ∈ Ω, Pj∈J ei(w) and that y is admissible for the grand coalition J in the new game iff j(w) = Pi∈N e′ L(y) is admissible for N in the initial game. Associate to a player j = (i, K) the utility gj defined for yj ∈ Yj by gj(yj) = ZK ψi(yj(w), w)dµ = µ(K)E(Ψi(L(y)i)Fi)v, ∀v ∈ K The set of admissible coalitions consists of subsets S ⊂ J associated to pairs (S0, F ), where S0 ⊂ N is a coalition of the economy EI and F ∈ ∧ Fk is a common knowledge event : k∈S0 S = {(i, K) : i ∈ S0; K ∈ Pi and K ⊂ F }. Denote by Pj(T ′) the projection of T ′ = T ′ the projections of the sets T ′ Let us show that, for every j = (i, K) ∈ J, gj is upper semi-continuous and concave on Yj. The concavity of gj results trivially from the concavity of ψi in its first argument. For the upper semi-continuity of gj, let yn j converge to yj. Then, yn j converges a.e. to yj. From the upper semi-continuity of ψi, for a.e. w ∈ Ω, lim sup ψi(yn j (w), w) ≤ ψi(yj(w), w). Hence, by Fatou's Lemma S on Yj, for every S ∋ j. Clearly, Pj(T ′) is compact. N on Yj, and note that Pj(T ′) contains all of lim sup gj(yn j ) ≤ ZK lim sup ψi(yn j (w), w)dµ ≤ ZK ψi(yj(w), w)dµ 14 The existence of the upper bound of gj is ensured by the fact that supa ψi(a, ·) is integrably bounded. This proves the upper semi-continuity of the functions gj. Associate the characteristic function form game GC = (V, J), where the value function V is defined by V (S) = (cid:8)v ∈ IRJ : there is yS ∈ T ′ S such that gj(yS j ) ≥ vj, for every j ∈ S(cid:9) − × IRJ\S. on every admissible coalition S of E ′ (that is associated to a pair (S0, F ), as described above). For the other form of coalitions, simply put V (S) = IRS It is obvious that to an element v of the core of GC corresponds an element in the core of E ′ (allocations not blocked by admissible coalitions). It is precisely an element y ∈ T ′ such that the grand coalition can ensure at least the gains given by the corresponding components of v at y for its members, where v is in the core of GC (note that the grand coalition is always admissible, since it is associated to (N, Ω)). Let us apply, for non-vacuity, the result of Scarf [1967] that guarantee an element in the core of GC under conditions 1)-3) restated in the proof of Theorem 1. The verification of 1) and 2) is straightforward. Indeed, 1) follows from the positivity of ψi's (0 ∈ V (S), for every S), the upper semi-continuity of the functions gj and the compactness of the admissible sets of allocations. Condition 2) results trivially from the definition of the sets V (S). For 3), take a balanced collection S with associated positive balancing weights δS, S ∈ S , and v ∈ ∩S∈S V (S). Then, for every S ∈ S , let yS ∈ T ′ j ) ≥ vj for every j ∈ S. If S is non-admissible, then yS can be taken arbitrarily. Let the element j . Let us check the admissibility of y, i.e. S such that gj(yS δSyS y = (y1, ..., yJ) be defined by yj = PS∈S ,S∋j y ∈ T ′. We can write a.e. Xj∈J yj = Xj∈J XS∈S ,S∋j δSyS j = XS∈S δSXj∈S yS j = XS∈S δSXj∈S e′ j = Xj∈J XS∈S ,S∋j δSe′ j = Xj∈J e′ j This formula establishes that y ∈ T ′. The fact that gj(yj) ≥ vj, for every j, follows from the concavity of the functions gj. The balancedness of GC results immediately. Consequently, the core of GC is nonempty and so is the core of E ′. For any y in the core of E ′, x = L(y) ∈ T is clearly in the interim core of the initial economy EI. 3.2 Comparison with interim private cores 1. In some of the literature cited in the introduction, the welfare of the agents is eval- uated by the mathematical expectation computed on the entire universe of states of nature even if the concepts addressed are interim. In some others, as in the original definition of the private core, the evaluation is effected by means of a conditional expectation (an interim utility) measured and considered, at the negotiation step, at every state of nature, including possibly commonly known unrealized events. In other words, to block an outcome, a coalition must improve upon its members' (in- terim) utilities at every state of nature, including states of unrealized events. Ideally, 15 in the interim situation, the agents may know that proper events have been realized. Then, conditional expectations seem to be more appropriate and preferably be con- sidered on proper realized events at the negotiation date. Unlike the private core, our concept defined above fulfils these criteria. To highlight this point, consider the situation of an economy EI described in Subsection 3.1. Let us make a comparison with the (interim) private core in its original definition [Yannelis, 1991], in which blocking is only possible over the entire Ω. More precisely, S blocks x ∈ T iff there exists an allocation yS ∈ TS such that E(Ψ(yS i )Fi)w > E(Ψ(xi)Fi)w, for a.e. w ∈ Ω, ∀i ∈ S Consider any economy as described above in which Ω is finite and assume that at one state of nature, say w0 ∈ Ω, that all players discern as a non-null proper event, all the utilities are equal regardless of the manner in which players pool their initial endowments. Assume that negotiations are made at the interim stage. If we adopt the definition of Yannelis [1991]10, all issues of the game belong to the private core. Indeed, no coalition can improve upon the conditional expectations of its members at the fixed state w0. Clearly, this is inappropriate if players can commonly discern another realized event not containing w0 on which they can improve their utilities. This situation, extreme as it may seem, is solved by the interim core defined above. Indeed, players can block allocations on proper events, and hence they may improve their expected utilities at least relative to the common knowledge event Ω \ {w0}. 2. The interim private core of Hahn and Yannelis [2001], p. 499, and the weak interim private core of De Castro et al. [2011]11 are different from the concept defined above. To make a more suitable comparison, consider again the economy EI, described in Subsection 3.1. To block an allocation, a coalition only has to improve its members' interim (expected) utilities at a unique state of nature. Consider a game with three players N = {1, 2, 3}. Each player's information is given by a finest partition of Ω = {a, b}, P1 = {{a, b}}, P2 = {{a}, {b}} and P3 = P1, respectively. Set Ci = IR+ and ei ≡ 1, for all i ∈ N. Let the prior probability µ on Ω be the equiprobability µ(a) = µ(b). The three utilities are given as follows : ψ1(x1, w) = x1, ψ3(x3, w) = x3 for all w ∈ Ω, x1, x3 ∈ IR+ and ψ2(x2, w) = x2 if w = a, and ψ2(x2, w) = 1 − x2 otherwise. Let us show that the (weak) interim private core of Hahn and Yannelis [2001] and De Castro et al. [2011] is empty. For these core concepts, a coalition S blocks an allocation x if it possesses an admissible allocation y ∈ TS, such that for a given state of nature w0 ∈ Ω, one has E(Ψi(yi)Fi)w0 > E(Ψi(xi)Fi)w0, ∀i ∈ S. In such a circumstance, let us say in the sequel that S blocks x at w0. 10see also Glycopantis et al. [2001], footnote p. 297, and Allen and Yannelis [2001] 11In which it is mentioned that the existence of this issue is an open problem, p. 528. 16 Given any allocation x ∈ T , E(Ψi(xi)Fi)w = xi(w), if i ∈ {1, 3}, for all w ∈ Ω. E(Ψ2(x2)F2)w = (cid:26) x2(w), if w = a, 1 − x2(w), if w = b. Coalition {i}, for i = 1 or 3, blocks any allocation x, where xi(w) < 1, w ∈ {a, b}. Then, we analyze only allocations x, where x1(w) ≥ 1 and x3(w) ≥ 1 and assume that only e2 can be shared among the three players to maximize their utilities. Such allocations can be written as x = (1 + α1, α2, 1 + α3), where α1, α2 and α3 are non- negative and satisfy Pi αi ≡ 1 and are freely determined by any coalition containing player 2. Let x = (1 + α1, α2, 1 + α3) be an allocation satisfying the requirements detailed above. Note that the measurability condition implies that xi, i ∈ {1, 3} is constant on {a, b}. We have only two possible cases : 1) for i0 ∈ {1, 3}, αi0(a) > 0. Without loss of generality, assume that i0 = 1. Then, the coalition {2, 3} blocks x at a. A blocking allocation may be y ∈ T{2,3} given by y2 = x2 + α1/2 and y3 = x3 + α1/2. 2) x1 ≡ x3 ≡ 1 then, x2 ≡ 1. In this case, E(Ψ2(x2)F2)b = 0 and for instance {1, 2} blocks x at b by playing the allocation y ∈ T{1,2} given by y1 ≡ x1 + 1/2 and y2 ≡ 1/2. This proves that the weak interim private core is empty. It is easy to check that the allocation x = (1, 1, 1) belongs to the interim core introduced in this paper. Note that the weak interim private core discussed in this example is shown to be nonempty when stated under ambiguity aversion and complete preferences [De Castro et al., 2011]. In particular, the measurability of player strategies is relaxed in this study, which, like the ambiguity setting, is incompatible with our interim aspect and renders the defined core impossible to compare with our concept. 4 Comment on information sharing One can elaborate, in our context, a core concept in which information can be shared. Let us illustrate this by providing details using the normal form game defined in section 2. If information sharing is permitted, then we find it convenient that players evaluate their payoffs by means of the conditional expectation with respect to all known information at the negotiation date. Furthermore, it is natural to consider that players update their expected utilities relative to the information they possess at the negotiation step. However, the (direct) intuitive formulation of such a concept, which can be stated as follows, is problematic : Definition 4. A coalition S blocks a given strategy x ∈ A, if there exists an event F ∈ ∨ Fj, there exists ε > 0, and if S has an admissible strategy yS ∈ AS, such that, for all j∈S 17 y−S ∈ A−S E(Ui(yS, y−S) ∨ j∈S Fj)w > E(Ui(x) ∨ j∈S Fj)w + ε, for a.e. w ∈ F, ∀i ∈ S The interim fine core of G is the set of non-blocked strategies. Indeed, if player i can access the information carried by ∨ i∈N Fi by joining the grand coalition, it is not meaningful to say that he participates in a proper coalition S and evaluates his welfare by E(U(.) ∨ Fi). Indeed, he is assumed to discern the finer events contained in i∈S Fi cannot matter to him. Fi, and then the mean of his payoffs on events of ∨ i∈S ∨ i∈N If we assume that each player intends to share his information with all or some of the other players, then the previous interim core can be generalized to encompass this situation. Indeed, it suffices to set Hi as the finest information that player i may possess at the negotiation step. Then the interim core, defined above, may be applied to this situation, by replacing Fi with Hi in definition 1. For instance, a fine core concept can be defined as follows : Definition 5. A coalition S blocks a given strategy x ∈ A, if there exists an event F ∈ ∧ Hi, there exists ε > 0, and if S possesses an admissible strategy yS ∈ AS, such that, for i∈S all y−S ∈ A−S E(Ui(yS, y−S)Hi)w > E(Ui(x)Hi)w + ε, for a.e. w ∈ F, ∀i ∈ S The interim fine core of G is the set of non-blocked strategies. By setting Hi = ∨ j∈N Fj, for all i ∈ N, we obtain a particular interim core in which all the information is shared. Then, these interim fine cores are nonempty following the theorems shown above. This definition seems to allow the formation of coalitions that can use the information of the remaining players to object to a status-quo allocation, which is an undesirable effect. However, because the defined concepts are nonempty, this can instead be seen as a stability property. That is, even if coalitions are tempted to behave in such a way, they cannot form by improving their members' payoffs. Acknowledgement The author is very grateful to an anonymous referee for his reading and suggestions that significantly improved the quality of this paper. 18 References B Allen. Cooperative theory with incomplete information. Staff Report 225, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1996. B Allen. Market games with asymmetric information : the core. Economic Theory, 29: 465 -- 487, 2006. B Allen and NC Yannelis. Differential information economies : introduction. Economic Theory, 18:263 -- 273, 2001. A Angelopoulos and LC Koutsougeras. Value allocation under ambiguity. Economic The- ory, 59:147 -- 167, 2015. Y Askoura, M Sbihi, and H Tikobaini. The ex ante α-core for normal form games with uncertainty. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 49:157 -- 162, 2013. RJ Aumann. The core of a cooperative game without side payments. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 98:539 -- 552, 1961. LI De Castro, M Pesce, and NC Yannelis. Core and equilibria under ambiguity. Economic Theory, 48:519 -- 548, 2011. J Diestel, WM Ruess, and W Schachermayer. Weak compactness in l1(µ, x). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 118:447 -- 453, 1993. F Forges, E Minelli, and R Vohra. Incentives and the cores of an exchange economy : A survey. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 38:1 -- 41, 2002. D Glycopantis, A Muir, and NC Yannelis. An extensive form interpretation of the private core. Economic Theory, 18:293 -- 319, 2001. G Hahn and NC Yannelis. Efficiency and incentive compatibility in differential information economies. Economic Theory, 10:383 -- 411, 1997. G Hahn and NC Yannelis. Coalitional bayesian nash implementation in differential infor- mation economies. Economic Theory, 18:485 -- 509, 2001. JC Harsanyi. Games with incomplete information played by "bayesian" players (i-iii). Management Science 1967; 14; 159-182. Management Science 1967; 14; 320-334. Man- agement Science 1968; 14; 486-502, 1967. A Kajii. A generalization of scarf's theorem : an α-core existence theorem without tran- sitivity or completeness. Journal of Economic Theory, 56:194 -- 205, 1992. T Kobayashi. Equilibrium contracts for syndicates with differential information. Econo- metrica, 48:1635 -- 1665, 1980. 19 LC Koutsougeras and NC Yannelis. Incentive compatibility and information superiority of the core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 3:195 -- 216, 1993. M Noguchi. Cooperative equilibria of finite games with incomplete information. Journal of mathematical economics, 55:4 -- 10, 2014. A Okada. Non-cooperative bargaining and the incomplete informational core. Journal of Economic Theory, 147:1165 -- 1190, 2012. FH. Page. Market games with differential information and infinite dimensional commodity spaces : the core. Economic Theory, 9:151 -- 159, 1997. R Radner. Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econontetrica, 36:31 -- 58, 1968. HE Scarf. The core of an n-person game. Econometrica, 35:50 -- 69, 1967. HE Scarf. On the existence of a cooperative solution for a general class of n-person games. Journal of Economic Theory, 3:169 -- 181, 1971. K Serfes. Non-myopic learning in differential information economics : the core. Economic Theory, 18:333 -- 348, 2001. A Ulger. Weak compactness in l1(µ, x). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 113:143 -- 149, 1991. O Volij. Communication, credible improvements and the core of an economy with asym- metric information. International Journal of Game Theory, 29:63 -- 79, 2000. S Weber. Some results on the weak-core of a non-side-payment game with infinitely many players. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 8:101 -- 111, 1981. R Wilson. Information, efficiency and the core of an economy. Econometrica, 46:807 -- 816, 1978. NC Yannelis. The core of an economy with differential information. Economic Theory, 1: 183 -- 198, 1991. 20
1907.06200	1	1907	2019-07-14T10:26:40	Necessary and sufficient condition for equilibrium of the Hotelling model	[ "econ.TH", "cs.IT", "cs.IT" ]	We study a model of vendors competing to sell a homogeneous product to customers spread evenly along a linear city. This model is based on Hotelling's celebrated paper in 1929. Our aim in this paper is to present a necessary and sufficient condition for the equilibrium. This yields a representation for the equilibrium. To achieve this, we first formulate the model mathematically. Next, we prove that the condition holds if and only if vendors are equilibrium.	econ.TH	econ	NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITION FOR EQUILIBRIUM OF THE HOTELLING MODEL SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ Abstract. We study a model of vendors competing to sell a homogeneous product to customers spread evenly along a linear city. This model is based on Hotelling's celebrated paper in 1929. Our aim in this paper is to present a necessary and sufficient condition for the equilibrium. This yields a repre- sentation for the equilibrium. To achieve this, we first formulate the model mathematically. Next, we prove that the condition holds if and only if vendors are equilibrium. 1. Introduction We study a model in which a linear city of length 1 on a line and customers are uniformly distributed with density 1 along this interval. We consider n vendors moving on this line. Let the location of the vendor k (k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , n) be xk ∈ [0, 1]. We assume that x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xn and denote the location of n vendors (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) by x. Since we study the competition between vendors, we consider n ≥ 2 in particular. The price of one unit of product for each vendor is identical. Moreover, we assume the following. If there exist l (l = 1, 2, 3, . . . , n) vendors nearest to a customer, the customer purchases 1/l unit of product per unit of time from each of the l vendors respectively. Every vendor then seeks a location to maximize his profit. We then represent the profit of vendor k per unit of time by a mathematical notation. Given a vector ξ = (ξ1, ξ2, . . . , ξn) ∈ [0, 1]n and 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, we define a set S(ξ, y) = {j ∈ {1, 2, 3, . . . , n} : ξj − y = min ξi − y}. By using a density function i 0 ρk(ξ, y) =   1 S(ξ, y) if if ξk − y > min i ξi − y ξk − y = min i ξi − y , we define fk(ξ) = Z 1 0 ρk(ξ, y)dy, (1.1) where A represents a number of elements in a set A. We call fk(x) the profit of vendor k per unit of time for a location x. We then define equilibrium as follows. Key words and phrases. The Hotelling model, equilibrium, Mathematical formulation. N. Tsuge's research is partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 17K05315, Japan. 1 2 SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ Definition 1.1. A location x∗ = (x∗ if 1, x∗ 2, x∗ 3, . . . , x∗ n) ∈ [0, 1]n is called equilibrium, fk(x∗) ≥ fk(x∗ 1, x∗ 2, x∗ 3, . . . , x∗ k−1, xk, x∗ k+1, . . . , x∗ n) (1.2) holds for any k ∈ {1, 2, 3, . . . , n} and xk ∈ [0, 1]. We review the known results. The present model is based on Hotelling's model in [4]. Although we consider homogeneous vendors, Hotelling did heterogeneous vendors. In [1, Chaper 10], Alonso, W. treated with the same model as our prob- lem for two vendors. He introduced this model as the competition between two vendors of ice cream along a beach. In [3], the model for n vendors was studied. Furthermore, Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G. investigated a necessary and sufficient condition for equilibrium. More precisely, they claimed that (1.i) and (1.ii) in [3, p29] if and only if n vendors are equilibrium (see also [p9][2]). Although this is an interesting approach from the point of mathematical view, unfortunately, it seems that (1.i) and (1.ii) are not sufficient conditions. In fact, we consider a location x = (cid:18) 1 10 , 1 10 , 3 10 , 3 10 , 7 10 , 7 10 , 9 10 , 9 10(cid:19) . Then, we find that f1(x) = f2(x) = f7(x) = f8(x) = 1/10, f3(x) = f4(x) = f5(x) = f6(x) = 3/20. Therefore, this example satisfies (1.i) and (1.ii). Remark 1.1. In [3], vendors in our problem are called firms and fk(x) seems to be called a market of firm k. In addition, we regard two pairs of peripheral firms in (1.ii) of [3] as firms 1, 2 and 9, 10. On the other hand, if x3 moves from 3/10 to 1/2, x3 can obtain a profit 2/10 more than the original one 3/20. In addition, the definition of their terminologies seems not to be clear, such as market, peripheral, equilibrium, etc. Therefore, our goal in this paper is to formulate this model mathematically and present a revised necessary and sufficient for equilibrium. For convenience, we set x0 = 0, xn+1 = 1 and denote a interval [xk, xk+1] by Ik (k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n). Then our main theorem is as follows. Theorem 1.1. (i) n = 2 (ii) n = 3 (iii) n ≥ 4 x = (cid:18) 1 2 , 1 2(cid:19) is a unique equilibrium. There exits no equilibrium. (1.3) (1.4) x is equilibrium, if and only if the following conditions (1.5) and (1.6) hold. I0 = In > 0 (n ≥ 2), I0 : I2 = 1 : 2, Ij ≤ 2I0 (0 ≤ j ≤ n), In−2 : In = 2 : 1 (n ≥ 4), 2I0 ≤ Ik + Ik+1 I1 = In−1 = 0 (n ≥ 4), (1.5) (1 ≤ k ≤ n − 2). (1.6) HOTELLING'S MODEL 3 2. Preliminary In this section, we prepare some lemmas and a proposition to prove our main theorem in a next section. We first consider the profit of i vendors which locate at one point. We have the following lemma. Lemma 2.1. We consider a location x = (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) with x1 ≤ x2 ≤ x3 ≤ · · · ≤ xn. We assume that xl < xl+1 = · · · = xk = · · · = xl+i < xl+i+1 (n ≥ 2, l ≥ 0, l + i + 1 ≤ n + 1, 1 ≤ i ≤ n). (i) If xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1, fk(x) = (ii) If xl = x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1, fk(x) = (iii) If xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 = xn+1, fk(x) = (iv) If xl = x0 and xl+i+1 = xn+1, fk(x) = (Il + Il+i). 1 2 i (cid:18)Il + i (cid:18) 1 Il+i(cid:19). Il + Il+i(cid:19). 2 1 1 2i 1 1 n . Proof. Proof of (i) We have fk(x) = Proof of (ii) We have fk(x) = Proof of (iii) We have fk(x) = Proof of (iv) We have fk(x) = 1 i (cid:18) 1 2 Il + 1 2 Il+i(cid:19) = 1 2i (Il + Il+i). 1 i (cid:18)Il + 1 2 Il+i(cid:19) = 1 i (cid:18)Il + 1 2 Il+i(cid:19). 1 i (cid:18) 1 2 Il + Il+i(cid:19) = 1 i (cid:18) 1 2 Il + Il+i(cid:19). 1 n (I0 + In) = 1 n . (cid:3) Next, the following proposition play an important role. Proposition 2.2. If the location of n vendors x = (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) with x1 ≤ x2 ≤ x3 ≤ · · · ≤ xn (n ≥ 2) is equilibrium, the following holds. x1 6= 0 and xn 6= 1. No more than 2 vendors can occupy a location. x1 = x2 and xn−1 = xn. (2.1) (2.2) (2.3) Proof. Proof of (2.1) If x1 = 0, we show that x is not equilibrium. (i) x1 = 0 and x2 6= 0 We notice that f1(x) = then have 1 2 I1. Setting x′ 1 = 1 2 I1, we f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = [0, x′ 1] + 1 2 [x′ 1, x2] > [0, x′ 1] > 1 2 I1 = f1(x), where I represents the length of a interval I. 4 SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ (ii) x1 = · · · = xi = 0 and xi+1 6= 0 (2 ≤ i ≤ n − 1) We notice that f1(x) = Ii. Setting x′ 1 ∈ (0, xi+1), we have f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = 1 2 ([0, x′ 1] + [x′ 1, xi+1]) = 1 2 [0, xi+1] = 1 2 Ii > 1 2i Ii = f1(x). (iii) x1 = · · · = xn = 0 (n ≥ 2) We notice that f1(x) = 1 n . Setting x′ 1 = 1 2 , we have f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = (cid:20)0, 1 2 (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:20) 1 2 1 2(cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) +(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) , 1(cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) = 1 4 + 1 2 > 1 2 ≥ 1 n = f1(x). From (i) -- (iii), if x1 = 0, we have proved that x is not equilibrium. Furthermore, from the symmetry, if xn = 1, we can similarly prove that x is not equilibrium. 1 2i 1 6 Proof of (2.2) We prove that x is not equilibrium, provided that i (3 ≤ i ≤ n) vendors occupy at a point. We assume that xl < xl+1 = · · · = xk = · · · = xl+i < xl+i+1 (l ≥ l + i + 1 ≤ n + 1, 3 ≤ i ≤ n). Here we recall that we set x0 = 0 and 0, xn+1 = 1. Therefore there exist xl and xl+i+1 at least one respectively. We notice that xl < xk < xl+i+1 and there exists no vendor on (xl, xk) and (xk, xl+i+1). Dividing this proof into four cases, we prove (2.2). (i) xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1 In this case, if Il ≥ Il+i, we notice that 1 2i 1 2 fk(x) = (Il + Il+i) ≤ (Il + Il+i) = x′ k ∈ (xl, xl+1), we have fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ 1 6 (Il + Il) = 1 Il. Setting 3 1 k, xk+1, · · · , xn) = 2 ([xl, x′ k] + [x′ Il > fk(x). k, xk]) = For the other case Il < Il+i, from the symmetry, we can similarly show that there exists x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) > fk(x). Thus, if xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1, we can prove that x is not equilibrium. k such that fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ (ii) xl = x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1 In this case, if Il ≥ Il+i, we find that fk(x) = 1 2 Il+i) ≤ 1 i (Il + 2 3 1 3 (Il + 1 2 Il+i) ≤ 1 3 (Il + 1 2 Il) = 1 2 Il. Setting x′ k = Il, we have fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) = [0, x′ k] + 1 2 [x′ k, xk] > [0, x′ k] = 2 3 Il ≥ fk(x). For the other case Il < Il+i, from the symmetry, we can similarly show that there exists x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) > fk(x). Thus, if xl = x0 and xl+i+1 6= xn+1, we have showed that x is not equi- librium. k such that fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ (iii) xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 = xn+1 From the symmetry of (ii), there exists x′ k satisfying fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ xn+1, we have showed that x is not equilibrium. k, xk+1, · · · , xn) > fk(x). Thus if xl 6= x0 and xl+i+1 = HOTELLING'S MODEL 5 (iv) xl = x0 and xl+i+1 = xn+1 In this case, we find fk(x) = 1 n . If xk ≥ 1 2 , for x′ k = 2 5 , we have fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) = [0, x′ 1 n 2 5 = ≥ = fk(x). k] + 1 2 [x′ k, xk] > [0, x′ k] For the other case xk < , from the symmetry, we can similarly show that there exists x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) > fk(x). Thus, if xl = x0 and xl+i+1 = xn+1, we have showed that x is not equi- librium. k such that fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ 1 2 From (i) -- (iv), we can complete the proof of (2.2). Proof of (2.3) If x1 < x2, we show that x is not equilibrium. (x1 6= 0) We notice that f1(x) = I0 + 1 2 1, x2, · · · , xn) = [0, x′ 1] + 1 2 [x′ I1. Setting x′ 1 = I0 + 1 I1, we have 2 1 1] = I0 + 2 f1(x′ I1 = f1(x). Thus x is not equilibrium. If xn−1 < xn, we can similarly prove that x is not equilibrium (xn 6= 1). (cid:3) 1, x2] > [0, x′ Finally, we compare a location after the movement of a vendor with the original one. To do this, we introduce the following notation. For a given location of n vendors x = (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) with x1 ≤ x2 ≤ · · · ≤ xn, we move vendor k from xk to a point in A ⊂ [0, 1]. We denote the resultant location by xk → A. We notice that xk → A represents the following vector (x1, x2, , . . . , xk−1, x′ k, xk+1, . . . , xn), (2.4) where x′ k is a location of vendor k after movement and x′ k ∈ A. Then we have the following lemmas. Since their proofs are a little complicated, they are postponed to Appendix. Lemma 2.3. If a location of n vendors x = (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) satisfies (1.5) and (1.6), I0 ≤ fk(x) (1 ≤ k ≤ n). Lemma 2.4. If a location of n vendors x = (x1, x2, x3, . . . , xn) satisfies (1.5) and (1.6), fk(xk → [0, 1]) ≤ fk(x) (1 ≤ k ≤ n). 3. Proof of Theorem 1.1 We are now position to prove our main theorem. Proof of Theorem 1.1 (i) We prove that if x = (x1, x2) = (cid:18) 1 2 , 1 2(cid:19), x is equilibrium. 6 SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ Proof. (i) We consider vendor 1. We then notice that f1(x) = x′ 1 ∈ (cid:20)0, 1 2(cid:19), we have 1 2 . For any f1(x′ 1, x2) = [0, x′ 1] + 1 2 [x′ 1, x2] < [0, x′ 1] + [x′ 1, x2] = [0, x2] = 1 2 = f1(x). For any x′ 1 ∈ (cid:18) 1 2 , 1(cid:21), from the symmetry of (a), we can similarly prove that f1(x′ f1(x′ 1, x2). 1, x2) < f1(x). Therefore, for any x′ 1 ∈ [0, 1], we have f1(x) ≥ (ii) Next, we consider vendor 2. For any x′ 2 ∈ [0, 1], we find that f2(x) ≥ f2(x1, x′ 2) in a similar manner to (i). From (i) and (ii), we have showed that (cid:18) 1 Next, we show that x = (cid:18) 1 fore, we prove that if x 6= (cid:18) 1 2 2 2 , , 1 2(cid:19) is a necessary condition for equilibrium. There- 2(cid:19), then x is not equilibrium. 1 , 1 2(cid:19) is equilibrium. (cid:3) Proof. From (2.1), when x1 = 0 or x2 = 1, x is not equilibrium. Therefore, we treat with the case where x1 6= 0 or x2 6= 1. (i) x1 6= x2 From (2.3), x is not equilibrium in this case. (ii) x1 = x2 We first notice that f1(x) = we obtain 1 2 in this case. If x1 > 1 2 , setting x′ 1 = 1 2 , f1(x′ 1, x2) = [0, x′ 1] + 1 2 [x′ 1, x2] > [0, x′ 1] = 1 2 = f1(x). If x1 < 1 2 that f1(x′ 1, x2) > f1(x). , from symmetry, we can show that there exits x′ 1 ∈ [0, 1] such From the above, we have proved that (cid:18) 1 2 , 1 2(cid:19) is a necessary condition for equilib- rium. (cid:3) Proof of Theorem 1.1 (ii) If n = 3, (2.2) contradicts (2.3). Therefore, we conclude that there exists no equilibrium in this case. Proof of Theorem 1.1 (iii) Finally, we are concerned with the case where n ≥ 4. Proof. First, it follows from Lemma 2.4 that (1.5) and (1.6) is a sufficient condition for equilibrium. Next, we show that (1.5) -- (1.6) is a necessary condition for equilibrium. There- fore, we prove that if (1.5) -- (1.6) do not hold, then x is not equilibrium. Observing Proposition 2.2, we do not have to treat with the case where x1 = 0 or xn = 1 or HOTELLING'S MODEL 7 more than 2 vendors occupy a location. From this reason, we assume that I0 > 0. We prove the following cases. (i) Condition (1.5) does not hold. (a) I1 6= 0 (b) I1 = In−1 = 0 and I0 : I2 6= 1 : 2 (resp. In−1 6= 0). In−2 : In 6= 2 : 1). (resp. I1 = In−1 = 0 and (c) I1 = In−1 = 0 and I0 : I2 = 1 : 2 and In−2 : In = 2 : 1 and I0 6= In. (ii) Condition (1.5) holds and condition (1.6) does not hold. (a) Condition (1.5) holds and Ij > 2I0. (b) Condition (1.5) holds and Ij ≤ 2I0 and 2I0 > Ik + Ik+1. Dividing this proof into the above cases, we prove our main theorem. (i) (a) I1 6= 0 (resp. In−1 6= 0) From (2.3) and x1 < x2 (resp. xn−1 < xn), x is not equilibrium. (b) I1 = In−1 = 0 and I0 : I2 6= 1 : 2 (resp. I1 = In−1 = 0 and In−2 : In 6= 2 : 1) (1) I0 : I2 = I0 : (2I0 + δ) 1 We notice that f1(x) = (δ > 0) 1 2 2 (cid:26)I0 + (2I0 + δ)(cid:27) = I0 + 1 4 δ. f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = Setting x′ 1 ∈ (x2, x3), we have 1 2 (2I0 + δ) = I0 + 1 2 δ > I0 + 1 4 δ = f1(x). (2) I0 : I2 = I0 : (2I0 − δ) 1 We notice that f1(x) = (δ > 0) 1 2 2 (cid:26)I0 + Setting x′ 1 = I0 − 1 4 δ, we have (2I0 − δ)(cid:27) = I0 − 1 4 δ. f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = [0, x′ 1] + 1 2 [x′ 1, x2] > [0, x′ 1] = I0 − 1 4 δ = f1(x). From the symmetry of (1) -- (2), we can similarly show in the case where In−2 : In 6= 2 : 1. Thus, x is not equilibrium in the case of (b). (c) I1 = In−1 = 0 and I0 : I2 = 1 : 2 and In−2 : In = 2 : 1 and I0 6= In (1) I0 < In We notice that f1(x) = x′ 1 = 1 − I0, we have 1 2 (cid:18)I0 + 1 2 · 2I0(cid:19) = I0. Setting f1(x′ 1, x2, · · · , xn) = 1 2 (2) I0 > In [xn, x′ 1] + [x′ 1, 1] > [x′ 1, 1] = I0 = f1(x). From the symmetry, we can similarly show that there exists x′ n such that fn(x1, · · · , xn−1, x′ n) > fn(x). From (1) -- (2), x is not equilibrium in the case of (c). (ii) Condition (1.5) holds and condition (1.6) does not hold. 8 SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ (a) (1.5) holds and Ij > 2I0 1 We notice that f1(x) = 2 (cid:18)I0 + 1 2 · 2I0(cid:19) = I0. Setting x′ 1 ∈ (xj, xj+1), we have 1, x2, · · · , xn) = f1(x′ Thus, x is not equilibrium in this case. Ij > · 2I0 = I0 = f1(x). 1 2 1 2 (b) (1.5) holds and Ij ≤ 2I0 and 2I0 > Ik + Ik+1 When k = 1, 2, n−1, n, we notice that I1+I2 = 2I0 and I2+I3 ≥ 2I0. Thus, we devote to considering 3 ≤ k ≤ n − 2. In view of (2.2), we divide (b) into the following three parts. (1) xk−1 6= xk and xk 6= xk+1 1 2 We notice that fk(x) = 1 2 k ∈ (x2, x3), we have fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ x′ k, xk+1, · · · , xn) = 2I0 = I0 > fk(x). Thus x is not equilibrium in this case. (Ik+Ik+1) < ·2I0 = I0. Setting 1 2 · (2) xk−1 = xk (xk−2 6= xk−1 and xk 6= xk+1) From Ik+Ik+1 < 2I0, we find Ik < 2I0. From Ij ≤ 2I0, we notice that Ik−2 ≤ 2I0. It follows that fk(x) = (Ik−2+ 1 4 (2I0 + 2I0) = I0. Therefore, for x′ Ik) < have fk(x1, · · · , xk−1, x′ This means that x is not equilibrium in this case. k, xk+1, · · · , xn) = 1 2 · 2I0 = I0 > fk(x). 1 4 k ∈ (x2, x3), we (3) xk = xk+1 (xk−1 6= xk and xk+1 6= xk+2) We can prove this case in a similar manner to (2). From (i) -- (ii), we have showed that if condition (1.5) or condition (1.6) do not hold, then x is not equilibrium. We can complete the proof of Theorem 1.1. (cid:3) Appendix A. Proof of Lemma 2.3 Proof. We estimate the profit of each vendor, fk(x) (k = 1, 2, . . . , n). (i) Vendor 1 We have f1(x) = (ii) Vendor 2 1 2 (I0 + 1 2 · 2I0) = I0. We can similarly deduce f2(x) = I0. (iii) Vendor n − 1 and n From the symmetry with vendors 1 and 2, we have fn−1(x) = fn(x) = I0. (iv) Vendor k (3 ≤ k ≤ n − 2) (a) xk−1 6= xk and xk 6= xk+1 We have fk(x) = (Ik−1 + Ik) ≥ (b) xk−1 = xk, xk 6= xk+1 (k 6= 3) 1 2 1 2 · 2I0 = I0. From (1.6), we notice that xk−2 6= xk−1. On the other hand, from Ik−1 = 0 and (1.6), we have Ik−2 ≤ 2I0 and 2I0 ≤ Ik−2. Thus HOTELLING'S MODEL 9 we have Ik−2 = 2I0. Similarly, we have Ik = 2I0. As a conse- quence, we have fk(x) = (Ik−2 + Ik) = · 4I0 = I0. 1 4 1 4 (c) xk−1 6= xk, xk = xk+1 (k 6= n − 2) We can show that fk(x) = I0 in a similar manner to (b). Combining (i) -- (iv), we obtain f1(x) = f2(x) = fn−1(x) = fn(x) = I0. if xk−1 = xk or xk = xk+1 fk(x) = I0 fk(x) ≥ I0 if xk−1 6= xk and xk 6= xk+1 (3 ≤ k ≤ n − 3). (3 ≤ k ≤ n − 3).   Thus, for x satisfying (1.5) and (1.6) and any k (1 ≤ k ≤ n), we have showed that fk(x) ≥ I0. Appendix B. Proof of Lemma 2.4 Proof. Dividing the proof into three parts, we prove this lemma. (cid:3) (i) fk(xk → (xl, xl+1)) ≤ fk(x) (ii) fk(xk → (xk−1, xk+1)) ≤ fk(x) (iii) fk(xk → {xl}) ≤ fk(x) (1 ≤ k ≤ n). (1 ≤ k ≤ n and 0 ≤ l ≤ n + 1). (xl < xl+1 and l 6= k − 1, k and 0 ≤ l ≤ n). Proof of (i) (a) l 6= 0 and l 6= n We have fk(xk → (xl, xl+1)) = (b) l = 0 1 2 Il ≤ 2I0 2 = I0 ≤ fk(x). We have fk(xk → (x0, x1)) < I0 ≤ fk(x). (c) l = n We have fk(xk → (xn, xn+1)) < I0 ≤ fk(x). Proof of (ii) (a) k 6= 1 and k 6= n (1) If xk−1 6= xk and xk 6= xk+1, we have fk(xk → (xk−1, xk+1)) = fk(x); (2) If xk−1 = xk (xk 6= xk+1), since Ik = 2I0 from (1.6) and Ik−1 = 0, 1 2 we have fk(xk → (xk−1, xk+1)) = · 2I0 = I0 ≤ fk(x); (3) If xk = xk+1 (xk−1 6= xk), we can deduce fk(xk → (xk−1, xk+1)) = I0 ≤ fk(x) in a similar manner to (2). (b) k = 1 We have f1(x1 → (x0, x2)) < I0 ≤ f1(x). (c) k = n We have fn(xn → (xn−1, xn+1)) < I0 ≤ fn(x). Proof of (iii) (a) l 6= 0, 1, 2, n − 1, n, n + 1 (1) l = k It clearly holds that fk(xk → {xl}) = fk(x). (2) l = k−1, k+1 and there exists another vendor at xk except for vendor k, or l 6= k − 1, k, k + 1 10 SATOSHI HAYASHI† AND NAOKI TSUGE‡ We deduce from (1.6)1 that fk(xk → {xl}) ≤ · 4I0 = I0 ≤ fk(x). (3) l = k − 1, k + 1 and there exists no vendor at xk except for vendor k. 1 4 1 4 (2I0 + 2fk(x)) ≤ We deduce from (1.6)1 that fk(xk → {xl}) ≤ 1 4 (2fk(x) + 2fk(x)) = fk(x). (b) l = 0 (resp. l = n + 1) We have fk(xk → {x0}) = 1 2 (resp. fk(xk → {xn+1}) = (c) l = 1, 2 (resp. l = n − 1, n) 1 2 I0 < I0 ≤ fk(x). I0 < I0 ≤ fk(x)) (1) k = 3 (resp. k = n − 2) We have f3(x3 → {xl}) = 2I0)) = I0 ≤ f3(x). (resp. fn−2(xn−2 → {xl}) = (2) k 6= 3 (resp. k 6= n − 2) We have fk(xk → {xl}) ≤ fk(x). (resp. fk(xk → {xl}) ≤ (I0 + 1 3 (I0 + 1 2 (I2 + I3)) ≤ 1 3 (I0 + 1 2 (2I0 + 1 3 (In + 1 2 (In−3 + In−2) ≤ fn−2(x)) 1 2 (I0 + 1 2 I2) = 1 2 (I0 + 1 2 · 2I0) = I0 ≤ 1 2 1 2 In−2) ≤ fk(x)) (cid:3) We can complete the proof of Lemma 2.4. The authors would like to thank Prof. Suzuki for his kind help and comments. Acknowledgements References [1] Alonso, W., 1964, Location theory, in J. Friedmann and A. W. Alonso (eds.), Regional Development and Planning: A Reader, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge) [2] Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G., 1972, The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Recon- sidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition, Queen's Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 87 [3] Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G., 1975, The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered : some new developments in the theory of spatial cometition, Review of Economic Studies, 42, 27 -- 49. [4] Hotelling, H., 1929, Stability in competition, Economic Journal, 39, 41-57. †‡Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu Gifu 501-1193 Japan. E-mail address: †[email protected] E-mail address: ‡[email protected]
1811.04197	2	1811	2018-12-14T01:11:11	Multilateral Index Number Systems for International Price Comparisons: Properties, Existence and Uniqueness	[ "econ.TH" ]	Over the past five decades a number of multilateral index number systems have been proposed for spatial and cross-country price comparisons. These multilateral indexes are usually expressed as solutions to systems of linear or nonlinear equations. In this paper, we provide general theorems that can be used to establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the Geary-Khamis, IDB, Neary and Rao indexes as well as potential new systems including two generalized systems of index numbers. One of our main results is that the necessary and sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions can often be stated in terms of graph-theoretic concepts and a verifiable condition based on observed quantities of commodities.	econ.TH	econ	Multilateral Index Number Systems for International Price Comparisons: Properties, Existence and Uniqueness Gholamreza Hajargashta,∗ , D.S. Prasada Raob,∗∗ aSwinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology bSchool of Economics, University of Queensland Abstract Over the past five decades a number of multilateral index number systems have been proposed for spatial and cross-country price comparisons. These multilateral indexes are usually expressed as solutions to systems of linear or nonlinear equations. In this paper, we provide general theorems that can be used to establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the Geary-Khamis, IDB, Neary and Rao indexes as well as potential new systems including two generalized systems of index numbers. One of our main results is that the necessary and sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions can often be stated in terms of graph-theoretic concepts and a verifiable condition based on observed quantities of commodities. Keywords: purchasing power parities, international prices, nonlinear Perron-Frobenius problem, connected graphs, DAD problem, generalized mean JEL classification: E31, C19 1. Introduction Purchasing power parity (PPP) is a widely used multilateral index for comparing price levels and macroeconomic aggregates such as gross domestic product (GDP) and its components across countries. PPPs are now regularly compiled as part of the World Bank's International Comparison Program (ICP). The most recently released findings from the ICP are for the year 2011 covering 177 countries of the world (World Bank, 2015). The PPPs from the ICP are used in assessing the size and distribution of the world economy and rankings of economies. For example, the latest ICP 8 1 0 2 c e D 4 1 ] . H T n o c e [ 2 v 7 9 1 4 0 . 1 1 8 1 : v i X r a Corresponding author. address: Swinburne Business School, BA Building, 27 John St, Hawthorn Victoria 3122, ∗ ∗∗ Australia, email: [email protected] The authors wish to thank Erwin Diewert for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We are indebted to Stephane Gaubert for pointing us to the connection between our fourth theorem and the DAD theorem in the mathematics literature. The authors are thankful to an anonymous referee for the incisive comments and helpful suggestions. We wish also to thank Bill Griffiths and Beth Webster whose comments have improved the exposition of the paper. This research is partly supported by ARC Grant DP 170103559. A part of work by Rao was undertaken when he was visiting the Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University in 2017. report indicates that the United States was the world's largest economy in 2011 followed by China, India and Japan. Results from the ICP also indicate that there has been a significant reduction in global inequality based on PPP-converted per capita income data. ICP results are also used for calculating World Development Indicators, the Human Development Index (HDI), regional and global poverty, and for comparing health and education expenditures across countries. The PPPs within the ICP are obtained by aggregating price data collected from countries using appropriate multilateral index formulas 1. A variety of multilateral index numbers have been proposed for the purpose of PPP compilation over the last five decades including but not limited to Gini-Elteto-Koves-Szulc (GEKS); Geary-Khamis (GK); generalized GK; Ikl´e (or IDB); Rao; and the Country-Product-Dummy (CPD). Rao (2013b) and Diewert (2013) describe the methods currently employed within the ICP. Economic theoretic approaches to multilateral systems have been discussed in Neary (2004), Feenstra et al. (2009), and Feenstra et al. (2013)] while Diewert (1988, 1999) and Balk (2008, 2009) provide overviews of the axiomatic or test approach to multilateral index numbers. Hill (2000, 2009) and Hajargasht et al. (2018) discuss spatial chaining methods based on minimum spanning trees and Rao (2009) offers a collection of papers that describe the state of the art and advances that have been made. The quest for indexes with better properties is ongoing and new indexes are being proposed e.g. see Hajargasht & Rao (2010) and Rao & Hajargasht (2016) for a new stochastic approach. A common attribute of the multilateral index number systems used in international comparisons is that the price indexes from these methods are usually solutions to some suitably formulated systems of equations. These systems can be linear 2 as is the case with the GK system or nonlinear as is the case with the Rao (1990) system. These systems can be meaningful only if they have solutions which are positive and unique (up to a factor of proportionality 3). Not surprisingly, some efforts have already been put into proving the existence of solutions to these systems [e.g. Rao (1971, 1976), Khamis (1972); Balk (1996, 2009); Neary (2004)]. However, the existing results do not often assume the most general conditions and do not cover some indexes. This paper contributes to the literature on existence and uniqueness of multilateral indexes in several ways. (i) It provides several theorems for existence and uniqueness of solutions to multilateral indexes in their most general forms. We use these theorems to prove viability of many indexes for some of which the results are new (e.g. for "equally weighted GK" and arithmetic index). We also provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of IDB and Rao indexes. (ii) The paper brings together and clarifies the mathematical concepts and tools required for establishing existence and uniqueness of solutions to different types of 1Details of the ICP methodology can be found in Rao (2013a) and World Bank (2013). 2Linear here means that equations are linear in unknowns or known functions of the unknowns. For example, a system is considered linear when it is linear in 1/PPPj. 3A constant multiple of a given set of PPPs leaves price comparisons between countries unchanged. Therefore, it is sufficient if PPPs are determined uniquely up to a factor of proportionality. 2 multilateral index number systems. (iii) It introduces a new commensurablity axiom for changes in the reference currency units; it is shown that this axiom leads to a class of multilateral index number systems based on generalized means of order ρ. This general class encompasses most of the known systems including the commonly used systems. (iv) Another insight from our results is that a compatibility condition is often required when defining an index in the sense that the weights in the equations defining world average prices (Ps) and the weights in equations defining purchasing power parities (PPPs) must be compatible. (v) Finally, an important contribution of the paper is to show that in general, existence and uniqueness of the indexes are guaranteed if the observed quantity matrix is connected. The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we define basic notations and concepts that underpin the multilateral index number systems considered in the paper. Section 3 describes linear and nonlinear systems including several commonly used index number systems. Section 4 states and proves the main theorems on existence and uniqueness of general classes of multilateral index numbers. These general theorems are in turn used to prove the existence and uniqueness of many of the index numbers currently used in international comparisons. Appendix A provides a mathematical toolkit (including various connectedness concepts, nonlinear eigenvalue theorems and their links to each other) that is used to prove the theorems stated in Section 4. 2. Notation and Basic Concepts Let pij and qij represent the price and the quantity of the i-th commodity in the j-th country respectively where i = 1, ..., N and j = 1, ..., M. We assume that prices are strictly positive and quantities are non-negative 4. We further assume: (i) for each i, qij is positive for at least one j and (ii) for each j, qij is positive for at least one i. As additional notation, we let p and q represent (N × M) matrices of prices and quantities of all commodities in all the countries where p is strictly positive and q is non-negative where due to (i) and (ii) each row and column of q has at least one strictly positive element. 2.1. The Purchasing Power Parity Let PPPj denote the purchasing power parity of currency of country j or the general price level in j-th country relative to a numeraire country. PPPj shows the number of currency units of country j that have the same purchasing power as one unit of currency of a reference country. For example, if PPP for currency of India is equal to INR 15.50 with respect to one US dollar then 15.50 Indian rupees in India have the same purchasing power as one US dollar in the United States. We note here that PPPjs would naturally be functions of observed price and quantity data. Multilateral 4An implication of this is that expenditure on an item in a country is positive if and only if the corresponding quantity is positive. 3 price comparisons consist of the matrix of all binary comparisons. A bilateral price comparison between two countries j and k, denoted by Pjk, is given by Pjk = PPPk PPPj ∀ j and k (1) The set of all binary price comparisons, Pjk (j, k = 1, 2, ..., M), defined in (1) are transitive 5 and that the price comparisons are unaffected when all the PPPjs are multiplied by a non-zero constant. Note that, for multilateral price comparisons to be meaningful it is necessary that PPPjs are strictly positive and determined uniquely up to a factor of proportionality, so that Pjk in (1) is unique. 2.2. The International Average Price A common feature of the index number systems we study in this paper is that these systems also determine international average prices of the commodities included in the comparisons. Let Pi denote the world average price of the i-th commodity (i = 1, 2, ..., N). These Pis are typically expressed as a function of the observed price and quantity data as well as the PPPjs of currencies. Intuitively, the international average price of a commodity is an average of prices of the commodity across countries. As prices in different countries are denominated in different currencies, it is necessary to convert these prices into a common currency unit prior to averaging them. This is achieved by converting observed prices using PPPs of currencies. PPPjs are also defined in terms of observed price and quantity data as well as international prices. In Section 3, we describe different methods for averaging prices such as arithmetic, geometric and harmonic averages. 2.3. Multilateral Index Number System A multilateral index number system is an interrelated system of equations which expresses the unknown purchasing power parities and international prices as functions of price and quantity data from different countries. In addition to being functions of observed price and quantity data, each PPPj is typically a function of all the international prices and similarly each Pi is a function of all the unknown PPPjs thus leading to a system of M + N equations in M unknown PPPjs and N unknown Pis. A general multilateral system may be specified as a system of equations of the following form: Pi = H1 PPPj = H2 i (PPP, p, q) j (P, p, q) (2a) (2b) where PPP and P are, respectively, M×1 and N×1 vectors of purchasing power parities and world average prices. The functions H1 j are strictly positive and continuous in all the arguments. (i = 1, ....., N) (j = 1, ....., M) i and H2 5Transitivity requires that all the pairwise comparisons are internally consistent and satisfy the condition Pjk = Pjl × Plk for allj, k and i. See Balk (2008) for more on transitivity. 4 i s are often in the form of some weighted average of pij/PPPj over j and H2 H1 j s are in the form of some weighted average of pij/Pi. Different index number systems differ in their specification of functional forms for the equations in (2). 3. Multilateral Index Numbers Systems Used in ICP In this section, we present a number of multilateral systems with an emphasis on those which have been used in the International Comparison Program since its beginning in 1968. 3.1. Geary-Khamis (GK) and Related Systems The GK system was first proposed by Geary (1958) as a method for comparing agricultural outputs across countries and later extended to its general form by Khamis (1972). The index was adopted as the main aggregation method in the ICP until 1985 (see Kravis et al., 1982, for a discussion of the method). The GK system consists of the following system of M + N equations: (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (3a) (3b) Here, PPPj is defined as a weighted harmonic mean of price relatives. Similarly, the international average price, Pi, is defined as a quantity-share weighted average of prices across countries after they are converted into a common currency using PPPjs. Note that Equation (3) is linear in 1/PPPjs and Pis. The necessary and sufficient conditions for existence and uniqueness of a solution have been derived by Rao (1971), Khamis (1972) and Balk (1996). We provide a proof of existence for a generic linear system so that results for specific systems such as GK can be obtained as corollaries. Cuthbert (1999) proposed the following generalized class of index number systems in order to show that, with respect to satisfying the additivity property, GK is not unique 6 = N(cid:88) (cid:80)N M(cid:88) qim(cid:80)M n=1 m=1 Pn pnj pnjqnj n=1 pnjqnj pim PPPm m=1 qim 1 PPPj Pi = = N(cid:88) (cid:80)N M(cid:88) (cid:80)M n=1 m=1 m=1 pnjqnj n=1 pnjqnj βmqim βmqim Pn pnj pim PPPm 1 PPPj Pi = (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (4a) (4b) where βjs are known constants. The GK system in (3) is a special case of (4) when βj = β for all j = 1, 2, ..., M. Other choices for βj could lead to the Ikl´e system (e.g. Balk, 1996, pp. 207). Cuthbert 6For a definition and further discussion of additivity see Balk (2008) pages 244-251. Cuthbert (1999) disproved a conjecture made by Rao indicating that the GK system is the only multilateral system satisfying additivity. Sakuma et al. (2009) provided another system that satisfies additivity but differs from the GK index. 5 (1999) did not investigate the existence of solutions to the generalized GK system in (4). Our Theorem-1 provides the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique positive solution to this system as a special case. Note that in systems (3) and (4), each PPPj is defined as a weighted harmonic mean of ratios {pnj/Pn, n = 1, ..., N} and each Pi is an arithmetic mean of the ratios {pim/PPPm, m = 1, ..., M}. A more general system based on generalized means of order ρ can be written as =  N(cid:88) (cid:80)M n=1 βjqim m=1 1 PPPj  M(cid:88) m=1 wnj (cid:17)ρ (cid:16)pnj (cid:16) pim Pn 1/ρ 1/ρ (cid:17)ρ Pi = βmqim PPPm (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (5a) (5b) pijqij where wij represents the expenditure share of commodity i in country j defined as wij = . n=1 pnjqnj A common feature of the systems in (3), (4) and (5) is that they share the same type of weights. The PPPj definition uses expenditure share weights whereas the international prices are defined using quantity share weights. It is easy to show that the GK and generalized GK systems defined above are special cases of the new system defined in (5). Of particular interest could be the case with ρ → 0 where the new system turns into the geometric version of the GK index. (cid:80)N 3.2. IDB, Rao and Related Systems We now turn to multilateral index number systems that make use of expenditure shares as weights ∗ for defining both PPPs and Ps. The following two sets of weights, wij and weights w ij are used (cid:80)N pijqij n=1 pnjqnj wij = ∗ ij w = wij(cid:80)M m=1 wim ∗ Here, wij is the expenditure share of commodity i in country j, whereas w ij is the expenditure share of commodity i in country j relative to the total share of this commodity across all the countries. Rao (1990) defines a system for international price comparisons as follows7 N(cid:89) (cid:16)pnj M(cid:89) (cid:16) pim Pn n=1 (cid:17)wnj (cid:17)w PPPm m=1 ∗ im PPPj = Pi = (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (6a) (6b) 7Rao (2005) has shown that the solution to this system can be obtained as weighted least squares estimates from the country-product dummy (CPD) method. Further details of the CPD method and its links with multilateral systems are discussed in Hajargasht & Rao (2010) and Rao & Hajargasht (2016). 6 In the system first proposed by Ikl´e (1972), and later simplified and clarified by Dikhanov (1997) and Balk (1996)8, expenditure share weights are used along with harmonic averages as shown in (7). (cid:17) (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (7a) (7b) Note that, in the Rao system in (6), PPPs and Ps are defined as geometric means of deflated national prices while in the Ikl´e-Balk-Dikhanov (IDB) system in (7), harmonic means of the converted national prices are used in a similar manner. Hajargasht & Rao (2010) proposed a similar system of equations but using arithmetic means: (cid:17) (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (8a) (8b) Hill (2000) proposed the "equally weighted GK system" (EWGK) defined below and found that it has better properties than the GK system (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (cid:17) (cid:16) N(cid:88) M(cid:88) (cid:16) n=1 = m=1 wnj Pn pnj ∗ w im PPPm pim 1 PPPj = 1 Pi (cid:17) (cid:16) N(cid:88) M(cid:88) (cid:16) n=1 m=1 wnj pnj Pn ∗ w im pim PPPm PPPj = Pi = N(cid:88) M(cid:88) = n=1 ∗ w im m=1 wnj Pn pnj pim PPPm 1 PPPj Pi = PPPj = wnj  N(cid:88)  M(cid:88) n=1 m=1 ∗ w im (cid:16)pnj (cid:16) pim Pn PPPm (cid:17)ρ1/ρ (cid:17)ρ1/ρ Pi = where the PPPj equations are the same as those in the GK and Ikl´e indexes and the Pi equations are the same as those in the arithmetic index. A new general index number system which encompasses the systems described in (6), (7) and (8) can be defined as: (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (9a) (9b) 8We follow Diewert (2013) and refer to this system as the Ikl´e-Dikhanov-Balk (IDB) system. 7 Different values for ρ leads to different indexes. For example ρ = 0 leads to the Rao system, ρ = −1 gives the IDB system and ρ = 1 leads to the arithmetic index 9. Theorem-5 proved in this paper can be used to establish the existence and uniqueness of all of these systems and more. 3.3. Neary (2004) and Rao (1976) Systems The Neary (2004) and Rao (1976) systems bring economic theory and the notion of cost of living indexes into the definition of PPPs. The Konus cost of living index is defined as the ratio of minimum expenditure required to attain a certain level of utility at two different sets of prices 10. The Neary (2004) system uses the Konus index to define PPPs as follows: = pnjq (cid:80)N N(cid:88) ∗ n(P, qj) n=1 pnjqnj (cid:80)M qim m=1 q∗ i (P, qm) n=1 Pn pnj pim PPPm 1 PPPj M(cid:88) m=1 Pi = (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (10a) (10b) ∗ i (P, qj) 11 in (10a) and (10b) are optimal (cost-minimizing) quantities obtained as the solution to q the following cost minimization problem where U(.) is a well-behaved utility function 12 argmin(q∗ 1 ,..., q∗ N) ∗ Pnq n subject to U(q ∗ 1 , .., q N) ≥ U(qj) ∗ (10c) N(cid:88) n=1 This problem is solved for each country separately. The main difference between the Neary ∗ system and the GK system is in the use of unobserved quantities, q ij. In the Neary system we ∗ have quantities q ijs which depend on the vector of international average prices P. This calls for a different theorem for establishing existence and uniqueness. The system proposed by Rao (1976) is similar to the Neary (2004) system except that the international average prices are defined differently: M(cid:88) m=1 qim(cid:80)M m=1 qim Pi = pim PPPm (i = 1, ....., N) (11) Rao (1976) studied existence of solutions to this system by using a version of a nonlinear eigenvalue theorem but his proof is incomplete. 13 9It might be possible to associate a stochastic model to this system and therefore estimate ρ or statistically test between these indexes. country i with quantity vector qj. 10Diewert (1976) discusses the Konus index in detail. ∗ ∗ i (P, qj) could be replaced by q 11The notation q ij to indicate that these quantities depend upon the utility obtained by 12Further details can be found in Neary (2004) and Rao (1976). 13In fact, he could not prove that λ∗ = 1 (see Section 4 for the relevance of the condition) and this is not expected to be the case in general due to lack of a compatibility condition. 8 4. Existence Theorems for Multilateral Index Number Systems As we mentioned before, multilateral index number systems can be classified into two groups: The first group are essentially linear systems in terms of PPPjs, or Pis, or in terms of some functions of PPPjs and Pis whereas the second group are nonlinear. In this section we provide theorems that can be applied to both cases. For stating and proving of these theorems we need a variety of mathematical concepts and tools that are summarized in Appendix A. 4.1. An Existence Theorem for Linear Systems The following theorem proves existence and uniqueness for the linear class of systems in its most general form. Theorem 1. Consider the following general system of M + N equations: N(cid:88) M(cid:88) n=1 m=1 fj(PPPj) = anj gn(Pn) (j = 1, ....., M) gi(Pi) = bim fm(PPPm) (i = 1, ....., N) (12a) (12b) where fj(.) and gi(.) can be any bijective functions from R+ → R+; aij and bij are non-negative weights. Under the following assumption: (T.1) aij and bij can be written such that aij = with qij > 0 ⇔ dij > 0 and and bij = cij(cid:80)M dij(cid:80)N n=1 cnj m=1 dim qij > 0 ⇔ cij > 0. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a unique positive solution (up to a positive scalar factor) is connectedness of the quantity matrix q. Before offering a proof for this theorem, we examine some aspects of the theorem. • Note that for existence of a non-trivial solution, aij and bij in equation (12) cannot be completely independent and a compatibility condition is needed. One such condition is given by Assumption (T.1) above. Khamis & Rao (1989) considered an interesting system in which conditions T.1 is not satisfied; they showed that the system has only a trivial solution. • As we discussed in defining PPP indexes, each PPPj is often set as some kind of average of pijs (over i) deflated by international prices Pis and each Pi as some kind of average of pijs (over j) deflated by PPPjs. With appropriate definitions for dij and cij, fj and gi we can easily cover such 9 indexes. As an example, consider the GK system (3) i.e. = N(cid:88) (cid:80)N M(cid:88) qim(cid:80)M n=1 m=1 Pn pnj pnjqnj n=1 pnjqnj pim PPPm m=1 qim 1 PPPj Pi = (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) It is easy to see that by defining dij = qij, cij = pijqij, fj(x) = 1/x and gi(x) = x in Theorem-1 we obtain this system. To prove the theorem, we establish the following two lemmas where we use the notation fj = fj(PPPj) and gi = gi(Pi). If we obtain solutions for fj and gi, then we can obtain solutions for PPPj and Pi by invoking the bijective nature of these functions. Lemma 1. Consider the following system of equations defined in terms of (f, g) N(cid:88) M(cid:88) n=1 m=1 dnj(cid:80)N cim(cid:80)M n=1 cnj m=1 dim fj = gi = gn fm (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (13a) (13b) ∗ M) (up to a positive scalar factor) is irreducibility of matrices B, C or D defined below. then a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a unique positive f ∗ = (g ∗ g 1 Proof of Necessity: Through direct substitution, we first express the system (13) in matrix form ∗ = ( f , ..., g , ..., f ∗ N) ∗ 1 (cid:48) (cid:48) and  c11 N(cid:80) N(cid:80) cn1 n=1 ... cN1 cn1 n=1 0 ··· ··· 0 ... 0 0 ... 0 d11 M(cid:80) M(cid:80) d1m m=1 ... d1M d1m m=1 m=1 dN1 dNm ... dNM ··· M(cid:80) M(cid:80)  0 C X1 ··· dNm m=1 D 0 X2  = ... 0 X1 X2 ··· ··· ··· ··· 10 c1M cnM N(cid:80) N(cid:80) n=1 cNM cnM n=1 0 ... 0   g1 gN f1 M(cid:80) m=1 ... ... M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 n=1 ... ... N(cid:80) d1m dNm cn1 =  g1 gN f1  M(cid:80) m=1 ... ... M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 m=1 ... ... N(cid:80) d1m dNm cm1  or more stacked form fM  where C, D, X1 and X2 can be identified from the cmM cnM m=1 fM n=1 above expression and B = Note that by defining F = DC, we can focus on the subsystem involving only f = ( f1, ..., fM) D 0  0 C .  N(cid:80) n=1 N(cid:80) n=1 dn1cn1 M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 cn1 n=1 ... ... dnMcn1 M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 cn1 n=1 dnm ··· ··· dnm ··· ··· FX2 = X2 ⇒ (cid:48) : (14) N(cid:80) n=1 dn1cnM dnm M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 N(cid:80) n=1 n=1 cnM ... ... dnMcnM M(cid:80) N(cid:80) m=1 dnm cnM n=1   f1 fM N(cid:80) n=1 ... ... N(cid:80) n=1  cn1 cnM =  f1 fM N(cid:80) n=1 ... ... N(cid:80) n=1  cn1 cnM (cid:48) (cid:48) , transpose of A , is a stochastic matrix 14 (each column of matrix A Alternatively, we can define E = CD and focus on a subsystem involving only g = (g1, ..., gN) . We can write each of these linear systems as AX = X where matrix A (i.e. F, E or B) is a non-negative matrix with columns that sum to one. To prove the necessity part of the theorem, we note that (cid:48) the matrix A sums to 1) and therefore it has a dominant eigenvalue equal to one with corresponding eigenvector equal to (1, ..., 1) (see e.g. Gantmacher & Brenner, 2005, pp 100). Now, for AX = X to have a unique positive solution, matrix A must have a dominant eigenvalue equal to one with a corresponding positive eigenvector. But this (i.e. both A and A having the same dominant eigenvalue with positive eigenvectors) is possible only if A is irreducible (see corollary in page 96 of Gantmacher & Brenner, 2005). To prove sufficiency, we use the Perron-Frobenius theorem. According to this theorem if matrix A is irreducible then AX = λX has a unique positive solution with λ > 0. Furthermore, since each column of A sums to one, we must have λ = 1. Note also that properties of the q matrix ensure are well-defined. 15 j=1 dij > 0 and(cid:80)N that(cid:80)M i=1 cij > 0 therefore f ∗ = ( f ∗ = (g ∗ 1 and g (cid:48) ∗ M) , ..., g (cid:48) ∗ N) , ..., f ∗ 1 (cid:48) Lemma 2. A necessary and sufficient condition for matrix F in (14), (and therefore E or B), to be irreducible is the connectedness of the set of countries based on the quantity matrix q. 14A matrix is said to be stochastic if it is non-negative and each row sums to one. 15Note that connectedness is necessary for uniqueness of the solutions. Without connectedness there can be solutions but they are not unique since the system of equations for some J ⊂ 1, ..., M can be divided into at least two independent ∗ Jc for any γ1 > 0 and for any subsystems with independent solutions f γ2 > 0 which violates uniqueness. j ∈ Jc} with γ1f j ∈ J} and f ∗ J and γ2f Jc = { f ∗ = { f ∗ j ∗ j ∗ J 11 N(cid:80) n=1 {F}kj = (cid:46) M(cid:80) m=1 cnj dnkcnj N(cid:80) n=1 dnm Proof of Sufficiency: If q is connected, then for any non-empty J ⊂ {1, 2, ..., M}, there exists at least one k ∈ J and i ∈ {1, ...., N} such that qik > 0 and at least one j (cid:60) J such that qij > 0. Note that this implies dik > 0, cik > 0, dij > 0, cij > 0. The sufficiency is proved if we show that {F}kj (i.e. element k, j of the matrix F) is positive. Note that It can be seen that this is positive, if and only if, there is at least one i ∈ 1, ...., N such that both dik > 0 and cij > 0, but connectedness as argued in the previous paragraph guarantees existence of such an i. Proof of Necessity: If matrix F is irreducible, then for any J ⊂ {1, 2, ..., M} (cid:44) ∅ there exists at least one k ∈ J and j (cid:60) J such that {F}kj > 0 which implies existence of at least one i ∈ 1, ..., N such that dik > 0 and cij > 0 but this in turn implies existence of qik > 0 and qij > 0 and therefore connectedness. Proof of Theorem-1: From Lemma-1, irreducibility of matrices F (E or B) is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a unique positive solution for the system (12) in Theorem-1. Lemma-2 shows that connectedness of the quantity matrix q is necessary and sufficient for irreducibility of the matrices involved thus establishing Theorem-1. We can restate the necessary and sufficient conditions stated in Theorem-1 on the quantity matrix q as: unique positive solutions to multilateral systems of the form (12) exist if and only if the adjacent graph Gq is connected (see Appendix A for further information). and g , ..., f (cid:48) ∗ M) ∗ = ( f ∗ 1 4.2. Choice of Functional Forms for f(.) and g(.) Theorem-1 stated above is quite general and functions f and g are (otherwise unrestricted) positive bijective functions. In this section, we introduce a simple axiom that underpins meaningful international price comparisons and show that under this axiom the functions, f and g, must have a particular form. In the Lemmas and Theorem-1 proved above, we have shown that if there is a positive f and ∗ δg for every δ > 0 is also a solution. We have assumed that fj and gi are invertible functions, therefore there exist vectors PPP and P that solve system (12). However, in general if PPPjs and Pis are solutions then f that solves the system of equations then δf {δgi(Pi)} are also solutions. {δ fj(PPPj)} and g −1 i In order to narrow the class of functions f(.) and g(.), we invoke the following axiom which states that if the unit of measurement of the reference currency is multiplied by γ then the international average price of the commodity must be divided by γ. For example, if the reference currency is 1 US dollar and if the international average price of wheat per tonne is US $125; then when the reference currency is changed to a 100 US dollar unit of currency then the international average ∗ = (g ∗ 1 , ..., g (cid:48) ∗ N) −1 j ∗ 12 price would be 1.25 units of reference currency (US $100 unit). Axiom of Change of Reference Currency Unit: This axiom simply states that if PPP ∗ solutions to the multilateral system, then γPPP γ > 0 . ∗ and (1/γ)P are should also be solutions for every ∗ and P ∗ This axiom helps us to narrow the class of functions f(.) and g(.) that can be used in international comparisons. Theorem-2 below establishes the functional forms for f and g that satisfy the axiom of units of reference currency unit. Theorem 2. The axiom of change of reference currency unit is both necessary and sufficient for the functions fj(.) and gi(.) to be of the form fj(x) = αjxρ and gi(x) = βix −ρ for any αj > 0, βi > 0 and ρ ∈ R. 16 Proof of Necessity: Note that having both [PPP, P] and [γPPP, (1/γ)P] as solutions for any γ > 0 is equivalent to having both [ fj(PPPj), gi(Pi)] and [ fj(γPPPj), gi(1/γ)Pi)] as solutions to equations in (12). On the other hand, according to Theorem-1 if [ fj(PPPj), gi(Pi)] is a solution then [δ fj(PPPj), δgi(Pi)] is also a solution for every δ > 0. Therefore, for every γ > 0 there exists some δ > 0 such that: fj(γPPPj) = δ fj(PPPj) gi( 1 γPi) = δgi(Pi) j = 1, 2, ..., M i = 1, 2, ..., N Since we are assuming this to be true for all possible solutions [PPP, P] > 0, we apply these conditions to the case where PPPj = 1 and Pi = 1 (e.g. when all prices in all countries are the same) and have fj(γ) = δ fj(1) 1 γ) = δgi(1) gi( (j = 1, 2, ..., M) (i = 1, 2, ..., N) Then the equations can be rewritten as: fj(PPPj) for j = 1, 2, ..., M fj(γPPPj) = fj(γ) fj(1) γPi) = gi(1/γ) gi(1) 1 gi( gi(Pi) for i = 1, 2, ..., N where fj(γ) and gi(1/γ) are continuous functions defined over R+. In general, each equation in the above system is a special form of the 4th Pexiders functional equation (see e.g. Acz´el, 1966; Diewert, 2011). The non-trivial solution to this system of functional equations takes the form fj(x) = αjxρ1j and gi(x) = βixρ2i for any ρ1j, ρ2i ∈ R and fj(1) = αj and gi(1) = βi. But note that 16Here we exclude trivial situations where either fj(x) = 0 or gi(y) = 0. 13 δ = f1(γ) f1(1) = .... = fM(γ) fM(1) ⇒ γρ1,1 = .... = γρ1,M = γ−ρ2,1 = .... = γ−ρ2,N But since this is true for every γ > 0; we must have ρ1,1 = .... = ρ1,M = −ρ2,1 = .... = −ρ2,N = ρ. = .... = gN(1/γ) gN(1) = g1(1/γ) g1(1) Proof of Sufficiency: The proof is trivial. 4.3. Existence of GK, Generalized GK, EWGK and the Generalized Mean Systems We can use Theorem-1 to establish the existence conditions for the GK system and its generalizations. Corollary 1: A necessary and sufficient condition for existence and uniqueness of the GK index (3), generalized GK (4), EWGK and the system based on generalized means (5) is connectedness of quantity matrix, q. Proof : In system (12), defining fj(x) = 1 uniqueness of generalized GK index (4) can be proved by defining fj(x) = 1 and dij = βjqij. To prove the result for system (5), define fj(x) = 1 To prove the results for EWGK, define fj(x) = 1 x, g(x) = x, cij = pijqij and dij = qij leads to (3). Existence and x, g(x) = x, cij = βjpijqij xρ , g(x) = xρ, cij = βjpijqij and dij = βjqij. x, g(x) = x, cij = wij and dij = wij/pij. 4.4. Existence Theorems for Neary (2004) and Rao (1976) Systems Theorem-1 does not cover all multilateral systems of interest. Theorem-3 below extends Theorem-1 to the case where the dijs and cijs are functions of P. As we saw in Section 3, Rao (1976) and Neary (2004) offer examples of such indexes. This specification makes the systems more complex and conditions for their existence and uniqueness more difficult to establish. 17 Theorem 3. Consider the following general system of equations (cid:80)N N(cid:88) (cid:80)M n=1 1 PPPj Pi = = M(cid:88) m=1 dnj(P, p, q) n=1 cnj(P, p, q) 1 Pn cim(P, p, q) m=1 dim(P, p, q) PPPm (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (15a) (15b) Let dij(P, p, q) ≥ 0 and cij(P, p, q) ≥ 0 be continuous homogeneous functions of the same degree with respect to P then (i) there is at least one non-negative solution with some positive elements (up to a positive scalar multiple). 17The theorem can be written in terms of functions of Pis and PPPjs with conditions stated in Theorem-2 but to avoid cumbersome notation here we focus on fj(x) = x and gi(x) = 1/x. 14 (ii) there is at least one positive solution (up to a positive scalar multiple) if dij(P, p, q) and cij(P, p, q) are such that the vector function G defined below satisfies monotonicity and strong connectedness. (iii) there is a unique positive solution (up to a positive scalar multiple) if dij(P, p, q) and cij(P, p, q) are such that the vector function G satisfies monotonicity and indecomposibility. Proof : Substitute PPPj from (15a) into (15b) and define G as M(cid:88) m=1 Gi = cim(P, p, q) N(cid:80) M(cid:80) n=1 m=1 (cid:80)N dnm(P, p, q) n=1 cnm(P, p, q) dim(P, p, q) Pn (i = 1, ....., N) It is easy to see that G satisfies conditions (1) and (2) of the nonlinear Perron-Frobenius theorem18 and therefore the system G(P) = λP has a non-negative solution (see e.g. Nikaido, 2016, pp 151 for a simple proof). If G also satisfies (3) and (4), there is at least one positive solution for the system and if G satisfies indecomposibility the positive solution is unique. (i.e. λ∗ = 1). Since there is at least one solution, we can write: The next step is to establish that the eigenvalue associated with the solution is equal to one ∗ P n (i = 1, ....., N) M(cid:80) λ∗ ∗ P i = m=1 cim(P ∗, p, q) M(cid:80) m=1 or λ∗(cid:18) M(cid:88) m=1 (cid:19) ∗ P i ∗, p, q) dim(P n=1 ∗, p, q) N(cid:80) (cid:80)N dnm(P n=1 cnm(P∗, p, q) dim(P∗, p, q) M(cid:88) N(cid:88) = cim(P m=1 Summing the equations over i we have 19 λ∗ N(cid:88) (cid:18) M(cid:88) i=1 m=1 ∗, p, q)P dim(P ∗ i n=1 ∗ P n ∗, p, q) (cid:80)N dnm(P n=1 cnm(P∗, p, q) N(cid:88) (cid:80)N dnm(P n=1 cnm(P∗, p, q) (cid:19) N(cid:88) (cid:19) ∗, p, q) (cid:18) M(cid:88) (cid:18) N(cid:80) (cid:80)N ∗, p, q) cim(P (cid:18) N(cid:88) n=1 cnm(P∗, p, q) n=1 ∗, p, q) P ∗ n ∗, p, q) P ∗ n ∗, p, q) ∗, p, q) dnm(P dnm(P cim(P m=1 n=1 i=1 (cid:19) i=1 N(cid:88) M(cid:88) M(cid:88) m=1 = = = (i = 1, ....., N) (cid:19) ∗ n P m=1 n=1 18see Appendix A for detailed discussion of eigenvalue theorems. 19Assuming that for each j there is at least one i for which cij > 0 and for each i there is at least one j for which dij > 0. 15 ⇒ λ∗ = 1 This establishes the existence of a positive solution to the system. Note that the system has at least one non-negative solution under very general conditions but in order to have a unique positive solution (using the nonlinear eigenvalue theorems in Appendix A), we need monotonicity and indecomposibility. Assuming monotonocity and qij > 0 ⇒ dij > 0 ⇒ cij > 0 using arguments similar to those used in proving Lemma-2, one can prove that G is indecomposable if q is connected but without knowing the exact form of cij and dijs or placing stringent conditions on these functions, we cannot prove monotonicity of G. Corollary 2: The Neary system (10), has at least one non-negative solution. It has a unique positive solution if q is connected and G satisfies monotonicity.20 ∗ Proof : In System (15) define cij = pijqij and dij = q ij where it is evident that the cij are homogenous ∗ of degree zero and the dij are homogenous of degree zero with respect to P since the q ij are derived through (10c) 21. 4.5. Existence Theorems for Rao (1990), IDB and Related Systems We now focus on a variant of Theorem-1 where the system cannot be turned into a linear system in terms of gi and fj. This theorem can be used to establish existence and uniqueness of solutions for systems that are not covered by system (12) such as the multilateral index numbers proposed in Rao (1990), IDB, 22 and the arithmetic index (8) described in Section 3. Theorem 4. Suppose fj and gi are known non-negative, bijective functions defined over non-negative values and fj(PPPj) = N(cid:88) M(cid:88) n=1 anjcn gn(Pn) aimdm gi(Pi) = fm(PPPm) m=1 (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (16a) (16b) with aij ≥ 0, ci > 0 and dj > 0, then compatibility and connectedness conditions (as defined in Appendix A) are necessary and sufficient for having a unique positive solution. ∗ 20It may be difficult to show monotonicity for Neary (2004) as it includes q 21The Rao (1976) system satisfies monotonicity but the weights are not defined in the form specified in Theorem-3 and q in the definitions. and it is not possible to prove λ∗ = 1. 22The existence of IDB system has been proved by Balk (1996) and Diewert (2013). 16 Proof : Substituting (16.b) into (16.a), we obtain N(cid:88) n=1 M(cid:80) fj = anjcn anmdm (j = 1, ...., M) m=1 fm This is exactly the DAD Problem discussed in Appendix A where compatibility and connectedness conditions are necessary and sufficient for existence of a unique solution. In this general form, we cannot relate the solution of the system to connectedness of the countries. However, there is a more interesting special case of this system where we can show that the connectedness of q is both necessary and sufficient for existence of a unique positive solution. This system covers the systems defined in equations (6), (7), (8) and (9) as special cases. Theorem 5. Consider the following system of equations: N(cid:88) M(cid:88) n=1 m=1 dnj(cid:80)N dim(cid:80)M n=1 dnj j=m dim fj = gi = enj gn eim fm (j = 1, ....., M) (i = 1, ....., N) (17a) (17b) where dij > 0 ⇔ eij > 0 ⇔ qij > 0. Then connectedness of countries through quantity matrix q is both necessary and sufficient for uniqueness of the solutions (up to a positive scalar multiple). Proof : Note first that this system is a special case of (16) by defining aij = ci =(cid:80)M j=1 dij and dj =(cid:80)N i=1 dij. ((cid:80)M m=1 dim)((cid:80)N dijeij , n=1 dnj) Sufficiency: Define D = {dij i = 1, ..., N, j = 1, ..., M}, A = {aiji = 1, ..., N, j = 1, ..., M} and let I ⊂ {1, ..., N}, J ⊂ {1, ..., M} with AIcJc = 0 where Ic is complement of I and AIJ = {aiji ∈ I and j ∈ J}. Since dij > 0 ⇔ eij > 0 ⇔ qij > 0, connectedness of q is equivalent to connectedness of A and D. To show that compatibility is automatically satisfied note that (cid:88) (cid:88) i∈Ic j∈Jc∪J (cid:88) (cid:88) i∈Ic j∈J ci = dij = dij since dij = 0 (18) (19) (cid:88) i∈Ic (cid:88) j∈J but we also have dj = (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (cid:88) (18) and (19) ⇔(cid:88) dij = i∈Ic j∈J j∈J i∈Ic∪I (cid:88) (cid:88) dj ≥(cid:88) j∈J i∈I dij + j∈J ci i∈Ic i∈Ic j∈Jc (cid:88) (cid:88) dij ≥(cid:88) i∈Ic (cid:88) j∈J dij 17 It is also obvious that the inequality is strict if and only if AIJ (cid:44) 0 (or DIJ (cid:44) 0) which proves compatibility. To illustrate the above argument, consider the following decomposition of D after appropriate re-ordering of rows and columns: Since DIcJc = 0, the sum of the elements in DIcJ i.e. (cid:80) (cid:80) j∈J dij is equal to(cid:80) i∈Ic ci, but(cid:80) j∈J dj is sum of the elements in DIcJ and DIJ. Necessity: According to the DAD theorem, a unique positive solution to (17) ⇔ compatibility and connectedness of A = {aiji = 1, ..., N, j = 1, ..., M} ⇔ connectedness of D ⇔ connectedness of q due to the assumption dij > 0 ⇔ qij > 0 . i∈Ic ∗ ∗, P ∗, (1/γ)P ∗ ] and [γPPP If the condition that, for every γ > 0 both [PPP ] are solutions to the system (16), is imposed then using arguments similar to those in Theorem-3 above, the functional forms used in the system must be set as fj(x) = αjxρ and gi(x) = βixρ for any αj > 0, βi > 0 and ρ ∈ R. Corollary 3: If matrix q is connected, systems (6), (7), (8) and (9) have unique positive solutions. We consider system (A.1) which encompasses all the others. Note that if in (17) we define fj(x) = gi(x) = xρ and dij = wij, eij = pρ i=1 wij = 1 we obtain system (A.1) and therefore Theorem 5 proves its existence and uniqueness. j=1 wij and dj =(cid:80)N ij, ci =(cid:80)M 5. Conclusion This paper provides general theorems for establishing existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to multilateral index number systems that make use of the twin concepts of international average prices and purchasing power parities in the context of international comparisons of prices and real incomes. The main result indicates that connectedness of the matrix of quantities or equivalently connectedness of the associated quantity-adjacent graph is in general both necessary and sufficient for existence of a unique positive solution. The theorems proved in the paper are general and powerful enough to prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions not only to the currently used system of index numbers but also systems that may come into vogue in the future. While simple connectedness guarantees the existence of solutions and therefore the viability of most of the multilateral index number systems, the strength of connectedness could have implications for the reliability of the indexes which are being studied in our other works. 18 References Acz´el, J. (1966). Lectures on Functional Equations and their Applications. Academic Press. Balk, B. (1996). A Comparison of Ten Methods for Multilateral International Price and Volume Comparison. Journal of Official Statistics, 12, 199 -- 222. Balk, B. (2008). Price and Quantity Index Numbers: Models for Measuring Aggregate Change and Difference. Cambridge University Press. Balk, B. (2009). Aggregation Methods in International Comparisons: An Evaluation. In Purchasing Power Parities of Currencies: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications (pp. 59 -- 85). Edward Elgar Publishing. Cuthbert, J. R. (1999). Categorisation of Additive Purchasing Power Parities. Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 235 -- 249. Diewert, W. E. (1976). Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. Journal of Econometrics, 4, 115 -- 145. Diewert, W. E. (1988). Test Approaches to International Comparisons. In Measurement in Economics (pp. 67 -- 86). Springer. Diewert, W. E. (1999). Axiomatic and Economic Approaches to International Comparisons. In International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices (pp. 13 -- 107). University of Chicago Press. Diewert, W. E. (2011). Functional Equations, Chapter 2 of Index Number Theory and Measurement Economics. http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/ediewert/580ch2.pdf. Diewert, W. E. (2013). Methods of Aggregation above the Basic Heading Level within Regions. In Measuring the Real Size of the World Economy (pp. 121 -- 68). World Bank Washington DC. Dikhanov, Y. (1997). Sensitivity of PPP-based Income Estimates to Choice of Aggregation Procedures. Development Data Group, International Economics Department, The World Bank, Washington DC, . Feenstra, R., Ma, H., Neary, P., & Rao, D. S. P. (2013). Who Shrunk China? Puzzles in the Measurement of Real GDP. The Economic Journal, 123, 1100 -- 1129. Feenstra, R., Ma, H., & Rao, D. S. P. (2009). Consistent Comparisons of Real Incomes across Time and Space. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 13, 169 -- 193. Gantmacher, F. R., & Brenner, J. L. (2005). Applications of the Theory of Matrices. Courier Corporation. Gaubert, S., & Gunawardena, J. (2004). The Perron-Frobenius Theorem for Homogeneous, Monotone Functions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 356, 4931 -- 4950. Geary, R. C. (1958). A Note on the Comparison of Exchange Rates and Purchasing Power between Countries. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 121, 97 -- 99. Hajargasht, G., & Rao, D. S. P. (2010). Stochastic Approach to Index Numbers for Multilateral Price Comparisons and their Standard Errors. Review of Income and Wealth, 56. Hajargasht, R., Hill, R. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Shankar, S. (2018). Spatial Chaining in International Comparisons of Prices and Real Incomes. Technical Report ,University of Graz, Department of Economics. Hill, R. (2000). Measuring Substitution Bias in International Comparisons Based on Additive Purchasing Power Parity Methods. European Economic Review, 44, 145 -- 162. Hill, R. (2009). Comparing Per Capita Income Levels across Countries Using Spanning Trees: Robustness, Prior Restrictions, Hybrids and Hierarchies. In Purchasing Power Parities of Currencies: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Edward Edgar Publishing Ltd. Ikl´e, D. M. (1972). A New Approach to the Index Number Problem. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86, 188 -- 211. Khamis, S. H. (1972). A New System of Index Numbers for National and International Purposes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), (pp. 96 -- 121). Khamis, S. H., & Rao, D. S. P. (1989). On a Gerardi Alternative for the Geary-Khamis Measurement of International Purchasing Powers and Real Product. Journal of Official Statistics, 5, 83. Kravis, I. B., Heston, A., & Summers, R. (1982). World Product and Income: International Comparisons of Real Gross Product. The World Bank. Lemmens, B., & Nussbaum, R. (2012). Nonlinear Perron-Frobenius Theory. Cambridge University Press. 19 Menon, M., & Schneider, H. (1969). The Spectrum of a Nonlinear Operator Associated with a Matrix. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 2, 321 -- 334. Morishima, M. (1964). Equilibrium, Stability and Growth.. Clarendon Press. Neary, J. P. (2004). Rationalizing the Penn World Table: True Multilateral Indices for International Comparisons of Real Income. American Economic Review, 94, 1411 -- 1428. Nikaido, H. (2016). Convex Structures and Economic Theory. Elsevier. Rao, D. S. P. (1971). On the Existence and Uniqueness of a New Class of Index Numbers. Sankhy¯a: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, (pp. 341 -- 354). Rao, D. S. P. (1976). Existence and Uniqueness of a System of Consistent Index Numbers. Economic Review, 27, 212 -- 218. Rao, D. S. P. (1990). A System of Log-change Index Numbers for Multilateral Comparisons. In Contributions to Economic Analysis (pp. 127 -- 139). North Holland. Rao, D. S. P. (2005). On the Equivalence of Weighted Country-Product-Dummy (CPD) Method and the Rao-System for Multilateral Price Comparisons. Review of Income and Wealth, 51, 571 -- 580. Rao, D. S. P. (2009). Purchasing Power Parities of Currencies: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications. Edward Edgar Publishing Ltd. Rao, D. S. P. (2013a). The Framework for International Comparison Program (ICP). In Measuring the Real Size of the World Economy, World Bank. Rao, D. S. P. (2013b). Computation of Basic Heading Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs). In Measuring the Real Size of the World Economy, World Bank. Rao, D. S. P., & Hajargasht, G. (2016). Stochastic Approach to Computation of Purchasing Power Parities in the International Comparison Program (ICP). Journal of Econometrics, 191, 414 -- 425. Sakuma, I., Rao, D. S. P., & Kurabayashi, Y. (2009). Additivity, Matrix Consistency and a New Method for International Comparisons of Real Income and Purchasing Power Parities. In Purchasing Power Parities of Currencies, Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Edward Elgar Publishing. World Bank (2013). Measuring the Real Size of the World Economy: The Framework, Methodology, and Results of the International Comparison Program - ICP. The World Bank. Appendix A. Mathematical Toolkit for Existence Theorems Appendix A.1. Connectedness, Graphs and Irreducibility In this section, we present the notions of connectedness across countries, (strong) connectedness of graphs, and irreducibility and their relationships to each other. Connectedness of Matrix q: The quantity matrix q = {qij}, an N × M matrix of quantities where qij is the quantity of i-th commodity consumed in j-th country, is said to be connected if the set of all countries cannot be split into two or more disjoint subsets such that there are no commodities that are commonly consumed across the two groups. More formally, a non-negative matrix of quantities q is said to be connected if for every nonempty proper subset of countries J ⊂ {1, 2, ..., M} (cid:44) ∅ there exists at least one country j ∈ J, one country l (cid:60) J and one commodity k ∈ 1, ...., N such that both qkj > 0 and qkl > 0. An equivalent mathematical definition of connectedness is that for every non-empty proper subset I ⊂ {1, 2, ..., N} and J ⊂ {1, 2, ..., M}, with Ic and Jc as their complements, qIcJc = 0 implies qIJ (cid:44) 0 where qIJ = {qij, i ∈ I and j ∈ J}. Connectedness of matrix q is critical in international comparisons. If q is disconnected, then 20 countries can be divided into two groups with no common items of consumption. In such a case, there is no basis for making price comparisons. Thus, connectedness of q seems necessary. In this paper, we show that this condition is both necessary and sufficient for uniqueness of several classes of multilateral index number systems. It is possible to give this notion of connectedness a graph theoretic interpretation. Quantity-Adjacent Graph: Let Gq represent a graph associated with a given quantity matrix q with countries as vertices of the graph. Two vertices j and k are connected by an edge if there exists a commodity i ∈ {1, 2, ..., N} such that qij > 0 and qik > 0. Connected Graph: A graph, Gq is said to be connected if for any pair of countries j and k, there exists a sequence of countries {j1, ..., jk} ∈ {1, 2, ...,} such that each consecutive pair of countries in the sequence are connected by an edge. It has been established that the graph Gq associated with a quantity matrix q is connected if and only if the quantity matrix q is connected . Connected Matrices and Adjacent Graphs-An illustration: The notions of connectedness of the matrix of quantities and the connectedness of the graphs associated with quantity matrices are central to the existence theorems proved in the paper. We illustrate these notions using three examples where we consider four countries and four commodities. The quantity matrix, q, in this case is 4 × 4 where columns represent countries and the rows represent commodities. The first example is where all the four commodities are consumed in all the countries. As a result, the graph associated with the matrix will have edges connecting all pairs of countries as shown below. 100 75 25 10 6 35 80 25 250 125 40 8 35 5 3 6  q =  In this case, it is easy to see that the matrix q is connected. The adjacent graph is a complete graph where each country is directly connected with every other country. This is a case where there is complete connectedness. The second example is where the first country consumes all four commodities whereas the other three countries consume only one or two of the commodities. The quantity matrix and the adjacent graphs in this case are of the following form. It is easy to check that the matrix q here is connected. We can see that Country 1 is connected to the rest of the countries. However, there are no direct links between Countries 2, 3 and 4. In this case the graph is connected with no cycles this means between any two countries there is only 21  q = 5 10 6 0 80 25 8 0 0 75 0 0  0 0 0 40 0 0 10 5 0 6 3 0 0 250 125 0 0 0 40 35 one chained path connecting the two countries. For example, Countries 3 and 2 are connected through Country 1. This type of graph is referred to as a spanning tree. Here there is connectivity only through Country 1 but it is still sufficient for connectedness of the matrix q. Finally, we consider an example where the four countries are divided into two separate groups, Countries 1 & 2 and Countries 3 & 4. These groups have no commodities commonly consumed. Therefore, the matrix q is not a connected matrix and it consists of two sets of matrices of lower dimensions (two) each of which are connected but the full matrix is not connected.  q =  In this example, countries 1 & 2 have commodities (1 and 2) commonly consumed whereas countries 3 & 4 consume only commodities 3 and 4. In this case, the adjacent graph is disconnected. Countries 3 &4 have no connections with Countries 1&2. In this case there is no basis for multilateral comparisons involving all four countries. There are well-known algorithms such as the Breadth-First Search (BFS) which can be used for checking connectedness of a graph (and as a result q). There are also very simple sufficient conditions that guarantee connectedness: (i) there is one commodity that every country consumes; (ii) there is one country that consumes all commodities. These conditions have been used by e.g. Balk (2008) in his proofs of existence. We now introduce several other definitions that are closely related to the connectedness of q and the existence of multilateral index numbers. Irreducibility of a Square Matrix: A non-negative M × M matrix A = {aij} is said to be irreducible if and only if for any proper subset J ⊂ {1, 2, ..., M} (cid:44) ∅ there exists at least one j ∈ J and i (cid:60) J such that aij > 0. Strong Connectedness of the Directed Graph Associated with Matrix A: Let the directed graph (digraph) associated to matrix A, Θ(A) be a directed graph (digraph) with vertices of 1, ..., M and an edge from i to j if and only if aij > 0. This digraph is said to be strongly connected if for 22 any pair of vertices of Θ(A), there is a path that connects them. It is a well-known result that irreducibility of a matrix and strong connectedness of its digraph are equivalent. The following definition generalizes the strong connectedness to nonlinear functions. ++ → RM Strong Connectedness of Digraph Associated with a Function G: For a function G(x) : RM ++ , xj→∞ Gi(x{j}) = ∞ let Θ(G) be the digraph with vertices of 1, ..., M and an edge from i to j if and only if lim (where vector x{j} refers to a vector that has all elements equal to one except for its jth element). Then G is strongly connected if for any pair of vertices, there is a path that connects them. It is easy to see that when G(x) is linear (i.e. G(x) = Ax), this is equivalent to strong connectedness of matrix A.23 As an example, consider the following nonlinear function (cid:110)√ (cid:110)√ √ x1x2, 2 √ x2x3 x2x3, 3 x3x1 max{x1, x3} (cid:111)  (cid:111) min max G(x) = The digraph associated to G is strongly connected as the following figure (constructed based on the above definition) shows Indecomposibility of a Function: For any pair of vectors x and y with x ≥ y ≥ 0 define a nonempty proper subset Ω = {j xj > yj} ⊂ 1, ..., M. Function G is indecomposable if there exists k (cid:60) Ω such that Gk(x1, ...xM) (cid:44) Gk(y1, ...yM). This concept of indecomposibility is equivalent to the irreducibility of a matrix if G is linear. Indecomposibility is generally a stronger condition than strong connectedness. Appendix A.2. Nonlinear Perron-Frobenius Theorems We start with a general multilateral system of M + N equations of the following form: Pi = H1 PPPj = H2 i (PPP, p, q) j (P, p, q) (i = 1, ....., N) (j = 1, ....., M) where PPP and P are respectively M× 1 and N× 1 vectors of purchasing power parities and world average prices. We can substitute equation Pi into the equation for PPPj leading to a homogeneous 23See Gaubert and Gunawardena (2004) for further information on strong connectedness, more examples and its relevance to nonlinear eigenvalue theorems. 23 system of M equations of the form: PPPj = H2 j (H1 i (PPP, p, q), p, q) (A.1) = Gj(PPP, p, q) (j = 1, ....., M) This means that the set of equations in (A.1) are such that each PPPj is expressed as a function of observed price and quantity data as well as all PPPjs. Solving equations in (A.1) is equivalent to solving the following general system of homogeneous equations: xj = Gj(x1, x2, ..., xM) j = 1, 2, ..., M or in vector form x = G(x) (A.2) To prove the existence of solutions to (A.1) or (A.2), Perron-Frobenius (or eigenvalue) theorems are the basic tools. There are a host of such theorems which give conditions for existence of a solution under various situations (see e.g. the book by Lemmens & Nussbaum, 2012, for a review of eigenvalue theorems). The following theorem is one of the general eigenvalue theorems due to Gaubert & Gunawardena (2004) and Morishima (1964). Nonlinear Perron-Frobenius Theorem: Let Gj(x1, x2, ..., xM) for j = 1, ..., M satisfy the following conditions: ++ → RM ++ 1. G(x) is a function RM 2. Homogeneity: functions Gj(x) for j = 1, ..., M are homogeneous of degree one in x 3. Monotonicity: for all x ≥ y, Gj(x) ≥ Gj(y) for j = 1, ...., M 4. Strong connectedness of the digraph associated with G(x) 5. Indecomposibility of function G(x) and consider the system of equations Gj(x1, ....., xM) = λxj j = 1, ...., M (i) under conditions (1) and (2), there is at least one non-negative x multiple) and λ∗ multiple) and λ∗ multiple) and λ∗ that satisfy the equation. that satisfy the equation. that satisfy the equation. (ii) under conditions (1),(2), (3) and (4), there is at least one positive x (iii) under conditions (1),(2), (3) and (5), there is a unique positive x (A.3) ∗ (up to a positive scalar ∗ (up to a positive scalar ∗ (up to a positive scalar A few remarks on the relevance of nonlinear eigenvalue theorems are: • Eigenvalue theorems play an important role in establishing conditions for the existence of solutions to the multilateral index number systems examined in this paper. It is sufficient if 24 i and H2 i and H2 the two functions, H1 j , are such that the function G obtained through (A.1) satisfies the conditions stated in the nonlinear eigenvalue theorems. • In the context of multilateral systems, we need to find a solution that satisfies equation (A.1), i.e. x = G(x). For this to hold, we need to also establish that λ∗ = 1 in equation (A.3). To have this, we often need some extra conditions on H1 j which we may refer to as compatibility conditions. • In all eigenvalue theorems, it is assumed that the function G(x) is continuous, homogenous and monotone, conditions which are easy to check but which are often not sufficient for a positive solution. A further assumption such as 4 or 5 above (which could be different across eigenvalue theorems) is often required. In this paper, we provide easily verifiable conditions to check such conditions in terms of the quantity data matrix. • A well-known eigenvalue theorem in mathematical economics proved by Morishima (1964, pp 195-199) and Nikaido (2016, pp 149-161) gives a sufficient condition for existence of a unique positive solution to the above problem by replacing assumption (4) above with (5) i.e. indecomposibility of function G(x). The linear version of this theorem (i.e. G(x) = Ax) is the well-known Perron-Frobenius theorem (Gantmacher & Brenner, 2005, Chapter 3) where the required sufficient condition for a unique positive solution is irreducibility of the non-negative matrix A. To prove existence of some of the multilateral systems, we need to appeal to another nonlinear eigenvalue theorem known as the DAD theorem (see e.g. Chapter 7 of Lemmens & Nussbaum, 2012, or Menon & Schneider (1969)). The DAD theorem entails a triplet {A, c, d} where A = {aij} is an N × M non-negative matrix, c is an N × 1 positive vector and d is an M × 1 positive vector. The DAD theorem, in its original form, gives conditions under which it is possible to find positive diagonal matrices D1 = diag{[δ1, ..., δN]} and D2 = diag{[∂1, ..., ∂M]} with D1AD2 having row sums equal to d and column sums equal to c. Note that  δ1a11∂1 δNaN1∂1 ...  ··· . . . ··· δ1a1M∂M ... δNaNM∂M D1AD2 = Since columns sum to c and rows sums to d, we must have δ1  M(cid:80) M(cid:80) m=1 ... a1m∂m = c1 ... & δN aNm∂m = cN ∂M m=1 ∂1 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) n=1 an1δn = d1 ... ... anMδn = dM n=1 25 This is a system of M + N equations in M + N unknowns. Substituting δis in the set of equations on the right from equations on the left and defining xj = dj/∂j , it is easy to see that this problem is equivalent to the following eigenvalue problem: DAD Eigenvalue Theorem: Consider the following system of equations: N(cid:88) n=1 M(cid:80) m=1 xm anjcn anmdm = xj for j = 1, ...., M or (cid:19) = x (cid:18)d c x (cid:48) A A where in the equation on the right, vector divisions are element by element. Then a necessary and sufficient condition for existence of at least one positive solution is the compatibility condition (defined below). A further condition of connectedness of A provides a necessary and sufficient condition for uniqueness. Compatibility Condition: For every I ⊆ {1, ..., N} and J ⊆ {1, ..., M} define Ic and Jc as complements of dj j∈J these sets. The compatibility condition implies that for every AIcJc = 0, the inequality (cid:80) holds, and the inequality is strict if and only if AIJ (cid:44) 0. Connectedness of A: For every I ⊂ {1, ..., N}, J ⊂ {1, ..., M}, AIcJc = 0 ⇒ AIJ (cid:44) 0. To see why compatibility is required, note that, with AIcJc = 0, after appropriate row and column permutations D1AD2 can be written as ci ≤(cid:80) i∈Ic where (cid:80) ci is the sum of the elements in the horizontal dashed rectangle and(cid:80) i∈Ic dj is the sum of j∈J elements in the red vertical rectangle. Excluding the zeros, the horizontal dashed rectangle is a subset of the red vertical rectangle. Therefore, in order to have a compatible set of equations we require the compatibility condition. Connectedness is required for uniqueness because otherwise the system can be decomposed into two unrelated subsystems. Appendix A.3. Relationships between the Concepts Assuming that the function G satisfies conditions (1) to (3) stated in the nonlinear eigenvalue theorem, the link between various concepts and eigenvalue theorems can be summarized as follows: • Irreducibility of a square matrix (equivalently, strong connectedness of its digraph) is a sufficient condition for existence of a unique positive solution to a linear eigenvalue problem (Perron-Frobenius 26 theorem). • Strong connectedness of the digraph of a function is a sufficient condition for existence of at least one solution to the nonlinear eigenvalue problem. • Indecomposibility is a sufficient condition for existence of a unique positive solution for the nonlinear eigenvalue problem. • Indecopmposibility is a stronger condition than strong connectedness but they are both equivalent to irreducibility if the function is linear. • Compatibility and connectedness of matrix A together provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for the DAD problem to have a unique positive solution. 27
1911.00872	1	1911	2019-11-03T11:24:12	Aggregation for potentially infinite populations without continuity or completeness	[ "econ.TH" ]	We present an abstract social aggregation theorem. Society, and each individual, has a preorder that may be interpreted as expressing values or beliefs. The preorders are allowed to violate both completeness and continuity, and the population is allowed to be infinite. The preorders are only assumed to be represented by functions with values in partially ordered vector spaces, and whose product has convex range. This includes all preorders that satisfy strong independence. Any Pareto indifferent social preorder is then shown to be represented by a linear transformation of the representations of the individual preorders. Further Pareto conditions on the social preorder correspond to positivity conditions on the transformation. When all the Pareto conditions hold and the population is finite, the social preorder is represented by a sum of individual preorder representations. We provide two applications. The first yields an extremely general version of Harsanyi's social aggregation theorem. The second generalizes a classic result about linear opinion pooling.	econ.TH	econ	Aggregation for potentially infinite populations without continuity or completeness∗ David McCarthy† Kalle Mikkola‡ Teruji Thomas§ Abstract We present an abstract social aggregation theorem. Society, and each individual, has a preorder that may be interpreted as expressing values or beliefs. The preorders are allowed to violate both completeness and continuity, and the population is allowed to be infinite. The preorders are only assumed to be represented by functions with values in partially ordered vector spaces, and whose product has convex range. This includes all preorders that satisfy strong independence. Any Pareto indifferent social preorder is then shown to be represented by a linear transformation of the representations of the individual preorders. Further Pareto conditions on the social preorder correspond to positivity conditions on the transformation. When all the Pareto conditions hold and the population is finite, the social preorder is represented by a sum of individual preorder representations. We provide two applications. The first yields an extremely general version of Harsanyi's social aggregation theorem. The second generalizes a classic result about linear opinion pooling. Keywords. Social aggregation; discontinuous preferences and comparative likelihood re- lations; incomplete preferences and comparative likelihood relations; infinite populations; Harsanyi's social aggregation theorem; linear opinion pooling; partially ordered vector spaces. JEL Classification. D60, D63, D70, D81, D83. 1 Introduction Individuals may have incomplete values and beliefs.1 They may be undecided which of two goods is preferable, or which of two events is more likely. The former is reflected, for example, in the literature developing multi-utility theory, and the latter in work on representing beliefs by sets of probability measures, and on decision theories that feature such sets. Individuals may also have discontinuous values and beliefs.2 For example, they may see some goods as being infinitely more valuable than others (or, equivalently, see some goods as only having significance as tiebreakers). In addition, allowing individuals to regard some events as infinitesimally likely ∗David McCarthy thanks the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 750012H) for support. Teruji Thomas thanks the Leverhulme trust for funding through the project 'Pop- ulation Ethics: Theory and Practice' (RPG-2014-064). An earlier version of this paper appeared as 'Aggregation for general populations without continuity or completeness' MPRA Paper No. 80820 (2017). †Corresponding author, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, [email protected] ‡Dept. of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University, Finland, [email protected] §Global Priorities Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom, [email protected] 1The literature on the topics of this paragraph is vast. References that are directly relevant to our approach are given in section 2.1. 2The applications we discuss are either decision theoretic (values) or to do with comparative likelihood (beliefs). Each subject has its own family of continuity axioms, but we rarely need to specify these, and we rely on context to determine which family we are discussing. 1 provides a solution to a number of problems to do with conditional probability, decision theory, game theory and conditional preference. A standard question is how to aggregate the values or beliefs of individuals to form a collective view. Here we also wish to allow the population to be infinite. One rationale is that even in a finite society, a decision maker having incomplete information about the values and beliefs of members of society may wish to model each individual as an infinite set of types.3 But the most obvious rationale comes from the much discussed problem of intergenerational equity. Here, the possibility that society will extend indefinitely into the future requires an infinite number of people. It is also commonly modelled by an infinite sequence of generations, each one with a social utility function; in such a model, the generations play the role of 'individuals' whose interests are to be aggregated.4 Section 2 presents a family of abstract aggregation theorems. Each of possibly infinitely many individuals, and society, is equipped with a preorder on a given set. We assume that these preorders are represented by functions with values in partially ordered vector spaces, and whose product has convex range. The use of partially ordered vector spaces is explained and motivated in section 2.1; axiomatizations of such representations are given in sections 3.1 and 3.2.2. Roughly speaking, our main result shows that Pareto indifference holds if and only if the social preorder can be represented by a linear combination of the representations of the individual preorders. Further Pareto conditions correspond to positivity conditions on the linear mapping. Section 3 illustrates the interest of the results with two applications, corresponding respec- tively to the aggregation of values and of beliefs. The first yields an extremely general version of the celebrated social aggregation theorem of Harsanyi (1955) that assumes only the central expected utility axiom of strong independence. The other shows that aggregate beliefs are given by linear pooling. To reiterate, unlike other results in the literature, these results hold without any completeness or continuity assumptions, and allow for an infinite population. We end in section 4 with a discussion of related literature, but for now we acknowledge Mongin (1995) and De Meyer and Mongin (1995) for drawing attention to formal similarities between preference aggregation and opinion pooling, and emphasizing the usefulness of the convex range assumption we use below. The proofs of our main theorems rely only on concepts from basic linear algebra, rather than any theorems from convex or functional analysis. All proofs are in the Appendix. 2 Main results 2.1 Representations in partially ordered vector spaces We are going to consider representations of preorders with values in partially ordered vector spaces. We first recall the basic definitions, and give some examples illustrating this type of representation. Recall that a preorder % is a binary relation that is reflexive and transitive; we write ∼ and ≻ for the symmetric and asymmetric parts of % respectively. Since preorders can be incomplete, we write x f y if neither x % y nor y % x. Let (X, %) and (X ′, %′) be preordered sets. A function f : X → X ′ is increasing if x % y ⇒ f (x) %′ f (y); strictly increasing if x % y ⇒ f (x) %′ f (y) and x ≻ y ⇒ f (x) ≻′ f (y); a represen- 3In the context of values, see e.g. Zhou (1997), attributing the idea to Harsanyi (1967 -- 68); for beliefs, see e.g. Herzberg (2015). 4The literature on this topic is largely shaped by the approaches of Ramsey (1928) (opposing impatience), and of Koopmans (1960) and Diamond (1965) (requiring impatience). Our results are compatible with both approaches. 2 tation of % if x % y ⇔ f (x) %′ f (y); an order embedding if it is an injective representation; and an order isomorphism if it is a bijective representation. A preordered vector space is a real vector space V with a (possibly incomplete) preorder %V that is linear in the sense that v %V v′ ⇔ λv + w %V λv′ + w, for all v, v′, w ∈ V and λ > 0.5 Note that we allow vector spaces to have infinite dimension. A partially ordered vector space is a preordered vector space in which the linear preorder is a partial order; that is, it is anti- symmetric. An ordered vector space is a partially ordered vector space in which the partial order is an order; that is, it is complete. When L : V → V ′ is a linear map between partially ordered vector spaces, L is increasing if and only if it is positive, in the sense that v %V 0 ⇒ Lv %V ′ 0; and L is strictly increasing if and only if it is strictly positive, meaning that v %V 0 ⇒ Lv %V ′ 0 and v ≻V 0 ⇒ Lv ≻V ′ 0. In this paper we will be exclusively concerned with representations with values in partially ordered vector spaces.6 We provide an axiomatic basis for using such representations for pref- erence relations in Lemma 16, and for comparative likelihood relations in Lemma 23 below, but for now we focus on examples. The set R of real numbers, with the usual ordering, is a simple example of a partially ordered vector space, so our representations include familiar real-valued ones. Allowing for arbitrary partially ordered vector spaces allows for natural representations of incomplete and discontinuous preorders, as the following examples illustrate. Example 1. Consider bundles of three goods (say fame, love, and money) represented by points in X = R3 +. Let V = R3, with the following linear partial order: (x1, x2, x3) %V (y1, y2, y3) ⇐⇒ (x1 ≥ y1, x2 ≥ y2, and, if x1 = y1 and x2 = y2, then x3 ≥ y3). 3 x2, 1 3 x1 + 2 + → V be the function f (x1, x2, x3) = ( 2 3 x1 + 1 Let f : R3 3 x2, x3). Suppose person A's preference relation %A over simple lotteries over R3 + is represented by expectations of f , thereby satisfying the expected utility axiom of strong independence.7 It violates the completeness axiom, because, for example, (1, 0, 0) fA (0, 1, 0), reflecting the fact that A finds fame and love only roughly comparable. (Note that the incomparability is limited in the sense that two units of fame are preferred to one unit of love, and vice versa.) The preferences violate standard decision theoretic notions of continuity, such as the Archimedean axiom of Blackwell and Girshick (1954) and the mixture continuity axiom of Herstein and Milnor (1953), reflecting the fact that while A sees money as valuable, she finds fame (likewise love) infinitely more valuable. Example 2. Consider a sphere S divided into open northern and southern hemispheres S+ and S−, and equator S0. Let µ+, µ−, and µ0 be the uniform probability measures on S+, S−, and S0, respectively. For every measurable set A ⊂ S define f (A) = (µ+(A ∩ S+), µ−(A ∩ S−), µ0(A ∩ S0)) ∈ V , for V = R3 as in the previous example. This f represents a likelihood preorder on the algebra X of measurable subsets of S. The preorder is incomplete, since, for example, the hemispheres S+ and S− are incomparable. (Here we have allowed the incomparability to be unlimited, in the sense that any positive-measure subsets of S+ and S− are incomparable.) Moreover, the equator S0, though more likely than the null set, is less likely than the interior of any spherical triangle, no matter how small. Correspondingly, the likelihood preorder violates standard continuity axioms for comparative likelihood, such as the Archimedean axiom C6 of Fine (1973), or the monotone continuity axiom of Villegas (1964) and its weakening C8 in Fine (1973). For both of these reasons, the likelihood preorder cannot be represented by a standard ([0, 1]-valued) probability measure. 5A linear preorder, in our sense, is sometimes called a vector preorder. See section 4 for generalisation to vector spaces over ordered fields other than R. 6See however Remark 5 for comments relevant to merely preordered vector spaces. 7A preorder % on a convex set X satisfies strong independence if for each α ∈ (0, 1), x, y, z ∈ X, x % y if and only if αx + (1 − α)z % αy + (1 − α)z. 3 In Example 1, the domain X = R3 + is a convex set and the representation f is mixture preserving, i.e. f (αx+(1−α)x′) = αf (x)+(1−α)f (x′) for all x, x′ ∈ X, α ∈ [0, 1]. When V = R, von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility representations of preferences are the paradigmatic representations of this type. In Example 2, the domain X is a Boolean algebra of sets, and the representation f is a vector measure, meaning that it is finitely additive: f (x ∪ x′) = f (x) + f (x′) for disjoint x, x′ ∈ X. When V = R, probability measures are the paradigmatic representations of this type.8 The applications of our aggregation theorems we provide in sections 3.1 and 3.2 involve mixture-preserving and vector-measure representations with values in arbitrary partially ordered vector spaces. The next examples illustrate how such representations generalize some standard ways of representing incomplete or discontinuous preorders. Example 3 (Multi-representation). Suppose a preorder % on a set X is represented in the following way. There is a family { fi i ∈ I } of functions from X to R such that x % x′ if and only if fi(x) ≥ fi(x′) for all i ∈ I. This can be rewritten as a representation by a single function F : X → Qi∈I R when Qi∈I R is equipped with the product partial order,9 making it a partially ordered vector space, and F is defined by (F (x))i = fi(x). Note that if the fi are mixture preserving on convex X, then F is also mixture preserving; and if the fi are probability measures on an algebra X, then F is a vector measure. Multi-representations like this are used in expected utility theory to represent the preferences of agents with incomplete values;10 in decision theory to represent the preferences of agents with incomplete beliefs;11 and in probability theory to represent agents with incomplete beliefs.12 Example 4 (Lexicographic representation). Suppose a preorder % on a set X is represented in the following way. There is a finite vector (f1, . . . , fn) of functions from X to R such that x % x′ if and only if fj(x) = fj(x′) for all j or fj(x) > fj(x′) for the least j such that fj(x) 6= fj(x′). The fj can again be combined into a single function F : X → Rn, with (F (x))j = fj(x). As in Example 3, if the fj are mixture-preserving functions or probability measures, then F is a mixture-preserving function or a vector measure. Moreover, this F represents % if we endow Rn with the 'lexicographic' order. To give the general picture, let (J , %J ) be an ordered set, and wo be the subspace of RJ whose members have well-ordered support.13 The lexicographic let RJ wo is defined by the property that f %lex f ′ if and only if f = f ′ or f (j) > f ′(j) order %lex on RJ for the %J -least j such that f (j) 6= f ′(j). This makes RJ wo what Hausner and Wendel (1952) call a 'lexicographic function space'. It is an ordered vector space. In the original example we can identity Rn with RJ wo, for J := {1, 2, . . . , n} with the usual ordering. Representations with values in lexicographic function spaces are used in expected utility theory to represent the preferences of agents with discontinuous values;14 in decision and game 8Standard treatments of probability theory assume countable additivity, but the motivation for this further requirement is reduced given that we will not be assuming continuity axioms like Monotone Continuity. 9In general, for a family {(Xi, %i) : i ∈ I} of preordered sets, the product preorder %P on Qi∈I Xi is defined by the condition that (xi)i∈I %P (yi)i∈I if and only if xi %i yi for each i ∈ I. 10See e.g. (1998); Dubra et al (2004); Baucells and Shapley (2008); Evren (2008); Manzini and Mariotti (2008); Evren (2014); Galaabaatar and Karni (2012, 2013); McCarthy et al (2017a). Aumann (1962); Fishburn (1982); Seidenfeld et al (1995); Shapley and Baucells 11See e.g. Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989); Seidenfeld et al (1995); Bewley (2002); Ghirardoto et al (2003); Nau (2006); Gilboa et al (2010); Ok, Ortoleva and Riella (2012); Galaabaatar and Karni (2013). 12For entries to a vast literature, see Halpern (2003) and Stinchcombe (2016); on multi-representation of in- complete comparative likelihood preorders, discussed further in section 3.2, see Insua (1992) and Alon and Lehrer (2014). 13That is, RJ 14See Hausner wo = { f ∈ RJ { j ∈ J f (j) 6= 0 } is well-ordered by %J }. (1954); Fishburn (1971); Blume, Brandenburger and Dekel (1989); Borie (2016); Hara, Ok and Riella (2016); McCarthy et al (2017b). 4 theory to represent the preferences of agents with discontinuous beliefs;15 and in probability theory to represent agents with discontinuous beliefs.16 The constructions in these examples can be combined, yielding representations of possibly incomplete and discontinuous relations that take values in Qi∈I RJi wo, a partially ordered vector space where each component has the lexicographic order and their product has the product partial order.17 In fact, this construction is fully general: every partially ordered vector space can be order-embedded in such a space.18 Finally, we note that our approach is also compatible with the use of representations with values in non-Archimedean ordered fields, such as non-standard models of the real-numbers.19 These provide natural ways of representing discontinuous relations; see Example 10 below. We discuss this topic further in section 4. Remark 5 (Preordered Vector Spaces). We focus on representations in partially ordered vector spaces, rather than merely preordered ones, because it seems desirable for objects that are ranked equally to be assigned the same value. But for some purposes it is useful to consider preordered vector spaces instead. Our results have implications for this more general case, insofar as any preordered vector space has a partially ordered vector space as a quotient.20 Lemma 18 and Theorem 19 illustrate some of the extensions this makes available. 2.2 Framework and axioms We assume throughout that X and I are nonempty, possibly infinite, sets. For each i ∈ I ∪ {0}, let %i be a preorder on X. In applications, I is typically a population, and for each i in I, %i expresses the values or beliefs of individual i, while %0 expresses those of the social observer. Say that a family {fi : X → Vi}i∈I of functions with values in vector spaces is co-convex if their joint range (fi)i∈I (X) ⊂ Qi∈I Vi is convex. Equivalently, the fi are co-convex if there is a surjective map q from X onto a convex set ¯X, and mixture-preserving functions ¯fi : ¯X → Vi, such that fi = ¯fi ◦ q. Thus co-convexity is a modest generalisation of the assumption that X is a convex set and the fi are mixture preserving. The central assumption of our main theorems will be that for i ∈ I ∪ {0}, the %i have co- convex representations fi with values in partially ordered vector spaces Vi. In the special case in which I is finite and each Vi is the real numbers with the usual ordering, the requirement of co-convex representations was introduced by De Meyer and Mongin (1995). Any preordered set can be shown to have a representation with values in some partially ordered vector space (McCarthy et al , 2018, Lemma A.6), so the question is the significance of co-convexity. We postpone this question, though, until sections 3.1 and 3.2, where we present contexts in which co-convex representations naturally arise. We consider the following Pareto-style axioms.21 15See Blume, Brandenburger and Dekel (1991a,b); Brandenburger, Friedenberg and Keisler (2008). 16See Halpern (2010); Brickhill and Horsten (2018). 17If desired, the Ji can be enlarged so that the representation may be taken into Qi∈I wo. Elements in this space can be seen as I × J matrices, with the row space lexicographically ordered, and one matrix ranking higher than another if it ranks higher in each row. RJ 18That every ordered vector space can be order-embedded in a lexicographic function space was shown by Hausner and Wendel (1952); the extension to partially ordered vector spaces is given in Hara, Ok and Riella (2016) and McCarthy et al (2017b). 19See e.g. Hammond Benci, Horsten and Wenmackers (2018). (1994a,b, (2018a); Benci, Horsten, and Wenmackers 1999); Herzberg (2009); Halpern (2010); Pivato (2014); (2018b); Brickhill and Horsten 20That is, if %V is a linear preorder on V , then it determines a linear partial order on V /∼V ; the quotient map V → V /∼V is a representation of %V . 21See e.g. Weymark (1993, 1995) for discussion in the context of Harsanyi's theorem. 5 P1 If x ∼i y for all i ∈ I, then x ∼0 y. P2 If x %i y for all i ∈ I, then x %0 y. P3 If x %i y for all i ∈ I, and x ≻j y for some j, then x ≻0 y. P4 If x %i y for all i ∈ I \ {j} and x fj y, then x 6-0 y. When I is finite and the %i are preference relations, P1 is Pareto indifference; P1 -- P2 together are sometimes called semi-strong Pareto; and P1 -- P3 are strong Pareto. Since we are allowing for incompleteness, P4 is a natural supplement. Given P2 and a sufficiently rich domain, P4 follows from the simpler condition that, if x ∼i y for all i ∈ I \ {j} and x fj y, then x f0 y. But to avoid domain conditions, we will appeal to P4 as formulated. P1 -- P4 are also natural conditions under other interpretations of the %i, such as when they are comparative likelihood relations. 2.3 Results Suppose we are given co-convex representations fi : X → Vi of the %i, i ∈ I. Set VI := Qi∈I Vi and fI := (fi)i∈I : X → VI. We are interested in the question of whether %0 has a representation of the form LfI, with L a linear map from VI into some partially ordered vector space V . When I is finite, we can write LfI = Pi∈I Lifi where Li : Vi → V is the ith component of L;22 thus LfI is an additive representation. But when I is infinite, L is not determined by its components; relatedly, the sum over i does not make sense.23 In any case, by endowing VI with the product partial order %P, we can consider the positivity of L. Note that if L is positive, or strictly positive, then so is every Li, but if I is infinite, the converse need not hold. Since fI and LfI are automatically co-convex, a necessary condition for the existence of a representation of %0 of the form LfI is that there exists some representation f0 : X → V0 of %0 such that all the fi, including f0, are co-convex. Our first theorem says that this necessary condition is also sufficient, and lays out the connection between the Pareto-style axioms and the positivity properties of L. Theorem 6. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi. (a) P1 holds if and only if %0 has a representation of the form LfI, with L linear. (b) P1 -- P2 hold if and only if %0 has a representation of the form LfI, with L linear and positive. (c) P1 -- P3 hold if and only if %0 has a representation of the form LfI, with L linear and strictly positive. (d) P1 -- P4 hold if and only %0 has a representation of the form LfI, with L linear and strictly positive, and every Li an order embedding. An obvious question is whether every representation f0 : X → V0 of %0, co-convex with fI, has the form LfI. Note that, if f0 is a representation, then so is f0 + b, for any constant b ∈ V0, but at most one of these will be of the form LfI. So a more reasonable question is whether we can write every f0 in the form LfI + b. The following result gives an affirmative answer, subject to the following domain richness condition. DR VI = Span(fI(X) − fI(X)). 22In other words, regardless of whether I is finite, Li := L1i, where 1i is the natural embedding of Vi into VI. 23Nonetheless, the linearity of L does entail a kind of finite additivity; see section 3.1 for further discussion in the context of Harsanyi's theorem. 6 In other words, fI(X) is not contained in any proper affine subspace of VI; equivalently, VI is the affine hull of fI(X).24 Theorem 7. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi. For the left-to-right directions of parts (b) -- (d), assume DR. (a) P1 holds if and only if f0 = LfI + b for some b ∈ V0 and L linear. (b) P1 -- P2 hold if and only if f0 = LfI + b for some b ∈ V0 and L linear and positive. (c) P1 -- P3 hold if and only if f0 = LfI + b for some b ∈ V0 and L linear and strictly positive. (d) P1 -- P4 hold if and only if f0 = LfI + b for some b ∈ V0 and L linear and strictly positive, with every Li an order embedding. In the special case in which I is finite and Vi = R for each i ∈ I ∪ {0} (so that P4 is vacuous), this is proved in De Meyer and Mongin (1995, Prop. 1) without assuming DR.25 So far we have allowed the representations fi to have values in different partially ordered vector spaces. One might wish to construct a single partially ordered vector space V in which all of the different preorders are represented, and in which the representation of %0 is essentially the sum of the representations of the %i. 'Essentially' is required here since we cannot literally sum over I when it is infinite. But say that a map S : Qi∈I V → V extends summation if it restricts to the summation map Li∈I V → V ; equivalently, each component Si of S is the identity map on V . Theorem 8. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi. Then P1 -- P4 hold if and only if there exists a partially ordered vector space V , representations gi : X → V of the %i for i ∈ I ∪ {0}, and a linear map S : Qi∈I V → V such that (a) g0 = SgI (b) S extends summation and is strictly positive on Qi∈I Span(gi(X) − gi(X))26 (c) fI, f0, gI, and g0 are together co-convex. If DR holds as well as P1 -- P4, we can further require V = V0 and g0 = f0. 2.3.1 Domain assumptions DR is a stronger domain assumption than is needed for Theorem 7(b) -- (d) and the last claim in Theorem 8,27 and we adopt it for its simplicity. It cannot simply be dropped from these theorems, even when I is finite, as the following example shows. Example 9. Let X = R and I = {1, 2}. Let %1 and %2 be represented by f1(x) = x and f2(x) = −x. Thus VI = R× R, fI(x) = (x, −x), and Span(fI(X)−fI(X)) = R(1, −1). Let V0 = R with the 'trivial' linear partial order such that any two distinct elements are incomparable (thus 24To interpret DR, it is worth noting that, by Lemma 25 below, and taking into account the fact that fI(X) is convex, Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) = {λ(fI(x) − fI(y)) : λ > 0, x, y ∈ X}. Thus when the %i are preference relations, so that the Vi may be seen as utility spaces, DR says that any logically possible profile of utility differences (i.e. any element of VI) is realized as the utility difference between some x, y ∈ X, at least up to scale. Indeed, DR is equivalent to the conjunction of the claims (i) that Vi = Span(fi(X) − fi(X)), so that that none of the utility spaces Vi is gratuitously large (in terminology introduced in section 2.4, this means that fi is pervasive); and (ii) that Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) = Qi∈I Span(fi(X) − fi(X)). 25In this special case, our methods give an alternative and arguably simpler DR-free proof of part (a), but they do not appear to help at all with DR-free proofs of the other parts. See however the discussion at the end of section 2.3.1. 26Here positivity refers to the product partial order on Qi∈I V , restricted to Qi∈I Span(gi(X) − gi(X)). 27For example, for Theorem 7(b)(c), DR could be replaced by the weaker assumption that Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) contains the positive cone { v ∈ VI v %P 0 }; for part (d) and for the last part of Theorem 8 one could assume that Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) contains both the positive cone and Li∈I Vi. However, even these assumptions are stronger than necessary. 7 x %V0 0 if and only if x = 0). Let %0 be represented by f0(x) = x. Thus (fI, f0)(X) is convex, %0 satisfies P1 -- P4, but DR fails. Suppose f0 = LfI + b, with L : VI → V0 positive. We have (1, 0) %P 0 and since L is positive, L((1, 0)) = 0; and similarly, L((0, 1)) = 0. Linearity of L implies L = 0, contradicting f0 = LfI + b. Thus parts (b) -- (d) of Theorem 7 do not hold. Similarly for the last claim of Theorem 8: there is no representation g1 of %1 with values in V0. When I is infinite, DR is perhaps surprisingly strong. Example 10. Suppose that I = N, X = Qi∈I[0, 1], Vi = R, fi(x) = xi for i ∈ I. Then VI = Qi∈I R is the space of sequences of real numbers, but Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) is the subspace of bounded sequences, so DR fails. Theorem 7(b) -- (d) also fail. As in Benci, Horsten and Wenmackers (2018a), choose a uniform probability measure µ on N with values in a non-Archimedean ordered field F that extends the reals; as such, it is an ordered real vector space. Let V0 be the ordered real vector space of finite (including infinitesimal) elements of F ; thus for every x in V0 there is some natural number n with n %V0 x. Note that µ has values in V0. Let f0 : X → V0 map each element of X to its µ-expectation; that is f0(x) = Pi∈I µ({i})xi. The %0 so represented satisfies P1 -- P4 (note that the %i are complete, so P4 is vacuous). All the %i satisfy strong independence, but %0 violates both the Archimedean and mixture continuity axioms of expected utility. Suppose f0 = LfI + b for some linear mapping VI → V0, implying b = 0. Consider the sequence v = (1, 2, 3, 4, . . . ) in VI, and for each natural number n, the bounded sequence vn = (1, 2, . . . , n − 1, n, n, n, n, . . . ). By linearity of L we must have L(vn) %V0 n − 1 (since f0( 1 n vn) is infinitesimally close to 1). But v %P vn for every natural number n. So if L is positive, we must have L(v) %V0 n for every n. But that is impossible, by construction of V0. A similar argument shows that the last claim of Theorem 8, involving DR, also fails. An interesting question therefore is how far DR can be weakened in Theorems 7 and 8. We plan to take up that question in other work, but for now we note that one can sometimes bypass DR by allowing L in Theorem 7 to be defined only on a subspace of VI that contains fI(X). For example, by adding constants to the fi, we can assume that fI(X) is contained in Y := Span(fI(X) − fI(X)). Without any need for DR, Theorem 7(a) -- (c) hold if L is only required to be defined on Y . Part (d) also holds under the further assumption that Y contains Li∈I Vi, which is needed for the components Li to be defined.28 This last assumption is weaker than DR when I is infinite, and is satisfied in Example 10. To illustrate, f0 in that example extends uniquely to a strictly positive linear L : Y → V0 that maps each bounded sequence to its µ-expectation, with every Li an order embedding, and we have f0 = LfI. But the example shows that L cannot be extended to a positive linear map VI → V0. We will not pursue domain questions any further. For simplicity, we use DR to discuss the uniqueness of the representations discussed section 2.3, to which we now turn. But we avoid it in the applications we present in section 3. 2.4 Uniqueness We first address the general question of to what extent representations with values in partially ordered vector spaces are unique. Say that a function f : X → V is pervasive if V = Span(f (X)− 28The proofs of these claims are trivial variations on the proof of Theorem 7, so we omit them. The situation for the last statement in Theorem 8 is slightly less straightforward, but, in short, we can again replace DR by the assumption that Y contains Li∈I Vi, if we only require in part (b) that S is strictly positive on Y ′ := Span(gI(X) − gI(X)). That is to say, assuming that Y contains Li∈I Vi, P1 -- P4 hold if and only if there exist representations gi : X → V0 of %i for i ∈ I, and a linear map S : Qi∈I V0 → V0, such that f0 = SgI, S extends summation, S is strictly positive on Y ′, and fI, f0, and gI are together co-convex. 8 f (X)); equivalently, V is the affine hull of f (X). The restriction to pervasive representations in the next result is mild, since by adding a constant to f we can always obtain a pervasive representation of the preorder on X that is represented by f : for any x0 ∈ X, the representation f ∗ : X → Span(f (X) − f (X)) defined by f ∗(x) = f (x) − f (x0) is pervasive. Lemma 11. Suppose given co-convex representations f : X → V and g : X → V ′ of a preorder % on X. Suppose that f and g are pervasive. Then there exists a unique linear order isomorphism L : V → V ′ and unique b ∈ V ′ such that g = Lf + b. The following result explains the sense in which the type of representation of %0 discussed in Theorem 6 is unique. Proposition 12. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi such that DR holds. Suppose that L : VI → V and L′ : VI → V ′ are linear maps to partially ordered vector spaces such that LfI and L′fI represent %0. Then there is a unique linear order isomorphism M : L(VI) → L′(VI) such that L′ = M L. The proof establishes in part that LfI : X → L(VI) and L′fI : X → L′(VI) are co-convex, pervasive representations of %0, so that Lemma 11 applies. Note that Proposition 12, unlike Theorem 6, assumes DR. Here is an example to illustrate why. Example 13. Let X = R, let I = {1, 2}, and let %0, %1, %2 all equal the standard ordering on R. Let V1, V2 = R with the standard ordering, and let f1, f2 : X → R both be the identity map. Thus VI = R × R and DR fails. Let L : VI → V := R map (x, y) 7→ x + y, and let L′ : VI → V ′ := VI be the identity map. Then LfI and L′fI both represent %0, but there is no linear map M : V → V ′ such that L′ = M L. Next we establish that the L and b in Theorem 7 are unique. Proposition 14. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi such that DR holds. Then there at most one linear map L : VI → V0 and one b ∈ V0 such that f0 = LfI + b. Here, DR cannot be dropped, even in the special case in which I is finite and Vi = R for each i ∈ I ∪ {0}, by Fishburn (1984, Cor. 1). In Theorem 8, given DR, we can choose g0 to be a pervasive representation of %0. (Choose f0 to be pervasive, using the construction before Lemma 11, and then apply the last statement of Theorem 8.) Thus we assume that g0 and g′ 0 are pervasive in the following result. Proposition 15. Assume that for i ∈ I ∪ {0} the %i have co-convex representations fi such that DR holds. Suppose gi : X → V and S : Qi∈I V → V satisfy the conditions (a) -- (c) of Theorem 8, as do g′ 0 are pervasive. Then there exists a unique linear order isomorphism L : V → V ′ and unique constants bi ∈ V ′ such that, for all i ∈ I ∪ {0}, g′ i = Lgi + bi. Moreover, S′(v) = LS((L−1vi)i∈I) for all v ∈ Li∈I V ′ + Span(g′ I(X)). i : X → V ′ and S′ : Qi∈I V ′ → V ′. Assume also that g0 and g′ I(X) − g′ 3 Applications We now present two applications in which co-convex representations naturally arise. 9 3.1 Preference aggregation Let us assume that the %i are preference relations, with %0 that of the social observer. In this context, co-convex representations arise naturally from the main expected utility axiom of strong independence (see note 7). Lemma 16. Suppose X is a convex set. (i) A preorder on X satisfies strong independence if and only if it has a mixture-preserving representation. The representation may be chosen to be pervasive. (ii) Any family {fi : X → Vi}i∈I of mixture-preserving functions is co-convex. Given that the %i satisfy strong independence, pervasive (and, by Lemma 11, essentially unique) mixture-preserving representation fi may be chosen for each of them, and these rep- resentations are automatically co-convex. The results of section 2 therefore apply.29 Here, for example, is a corollary of Theorem 8. Theorem 17. Suppose X is convex, and for all i ∈ I ∪ {0}, %i satisfies strong independence. Assume P1 -- P4. Then there exists a partially ordered vector space V , mixture-preserving repre- sentations fi : X → V of the %i, and a linear map S : Qi∈I V → V that extends summation, such that f0 = SfI. In this context, our results generalize the celebrated social aggregation theorem of Harsanyi (1955). In his framework, the population I is finite, and X is the set of simple probability measures on a given set of social outcomes. In contrast, we allow I to be infinite, and we allow X to be an arbitrary convex set, which may in particular be infinite dimensional.30 This allows for a wide range of models of uncertainty. For example, in the setting of objective risk, X may be any convex set of probability measures on a measurable space; in the setting of objective risk and subjective uncertainty, it may be the set of Anscombe-Aumann acts; in the setting of subjective uncertainty, it may be the set of Savage acts when those are equipped with convex structure, as in for example Ghirardoto et al (2003);31 it may be a set of simple lotteries with nonstandard probabilities; or it may be an arbitrary mixture space, and hence isomorphic to a convex subset of a vector space as noted by Hausner (1954).32 One version of Harsanyi's result is that, if P1 -- P3 hold, as well as strong independence, continuity and completeness for each %i, then the social preorder can be represented by the sum of real-valued mixture-preserving individual utility functions.33 Theorem 17 shows that 29For applications of Theorem 7, it may be useful to note that, in this context, DR is equivalent to the following domain richness condition, stated directly in terms of X and the %i: DR′ Suppose given xi, yi ∈ X and λi > 0, for each i ∈ I. Then there exist z, w ∈ X and λ > 0 such that, for all i ∈ I, λ λ+λi w + λi λ+λi xi ∼i λ λ+λi z + λi λ+λi yi. (Heuristically: the difference in value for i between z and w is λi/λ times the difference between xi and yi.) 30The dimension of X is, by definition, the dimension of the smallest affine space that contains it; equivalently, the dimension of the vector space Span(X − X). 31As is well known, however, allowing for subjective uncertainty is likely to lead to impossibility results; see the end of section 4. 32For a discussion of the relationship between mixture spaces in the sense of Hausner and mixture sets in the sense of Herstein and Milnor (1953), see Mongin (2001); Mongin constructs a natural map from each mixture set onto a convex set, and shows that it is an isomorphism if and only if the mixture set is a mixture space (or in his terminology 'non-degenerate'). 33For discussion of different variations of Harsanyi's result, see e.g. Weymark (1993). Note that Harsanyi's result is usually stated in terms of a weighted sum of individual utility functions; but one can absorb the weights into the utility functions to get an unweighted sum. Of course, in both the weighted and unweighted versions, the representation of the social preorder is a linear transformation of the profile of individual utilities. Roughly speaking, Theorems 6 and 7 generalize the formulation with weighted sums, while Theorem 8 and its corollaries Theorems 17 and 19 generalize the unweighted version. 10 essentially the same conclusion holds without assuming continuity or completeness, but assuming P4 (which is vacuous given completeness), and allowing the utility functions to be vector-valued. In light of the discussion after Example 4, and especially note 17, the conclusion of Theorem 17 may be made visibly closer to Harsanyi's by taking utility values to be matrices of real numbers; Harsanyi's conclusion is then the case where the matrices are one-by-one. The only caveat is that, when I is infinite, the linear map S used to combine the individual utility functions fi does not simply sum them up. However, we still get separability, or 'finite additivity'. If I = J ⊔ K, then VI = VJ × VK; denoting restrictions in the obvious way, we have SfI = SJfJ + SKfK. So much follows from the linearity of S; since S also extends summation, SJ is simply the summation map when J is finite. Our results also yield fully additive representations in some important cases when I is infinite. Suppose, for example, that in the context of Theorem 17, each element of X is a gamble in which only finitely many people from I have any chance to exist. For each i ∈ I and x, x′ ∈ X, it is natural to suppose that x ∼i x′ if i is certain not to exist in either one; thus fi(x) = fi(x′). By subtracting a constant from fi, we may assume that fi(x) = fi(x′) = 0. (Note that renormalizing fi in this way changes neither the fact that fi represents %i nor the fact that SfI represents %0.) The upshot of this construction is that, for each x ∈ X, fi(x) = 0 for all but finitely many i ∈ I. We can therefore write SfI = Pi∈I fi, a fully additive representation of the social preorder. Suppose now that X is a convex set of probability measures on a measurable space Y . It is natural to ask whether the representations constructed in Theorem 17, for example, can be written as integrals over Y , in the style of expected utility theory. To make the question precise, suppose we are given a vector space V and a separating vector space V ′ of linear functionals V → R.34 A function U : Y → V is weakly X-integrable with respect to V ′ if there exists f : X → V such that RY Λ ◦ U dµ = Λ ◦ f (µ) for all Λ ∈ V ′, µ ∈ X. In particular, every Λ ◦ U must be Lesbesgue integrable against every µ ∈ X. The Pettis or weak integral is defined by setting RY U dµ := f (µ). When f : X → V can be written in this form, we say that f is expectational. The question, then, is whether the representations fi, including f0, can be chosen to be expectational functions. In the most common case, where X is a convex set of finitely supported probability measures on a measurable space Y with measurable singletons, there is a straightforward positive answer: any mixture-preserving, vector-valued function on X is expectational (independently of how V ′ is chosen). However, in the general case, it turns out that we need to consider representations with values in preordered vector spaces (cf. Remark 5). Indeed, the following result (McCarthy et al , 2018, Lemma 4.3) contrasts with Lemma 16(i). Lemma 18. Let X be an arbitrary convex set of probability measures. A preorder on X satisfies strong independence if and only if it has an expectational (and not merely mixture-preserving) representation with values in a preordered (but not necessarily partially ordered) vector space. The next result uses this to elaborate on Theorem 8. Theorem 19. Suppose X is a convex set of probability measures on a measurable space Y , and, for all i ∈ I ∪ {0}, %i satisfies strong independence. Assume P1 -- P4. Then there exists a preordered vector space V equipped with a separating vector space V ′ of linear functionals; for i ∈ I ∪ {0}, functions Ui : Y → V that are weakly X-integrable with respect to V ′, such that µ 7→ RY Ui dµ represents %i; and a linear map S : Qi∈I V → V that extends summation such that U0 = SUI. 34Endowing V with the weak topology with respect to V ′ makes it a locally convex topological vector space whose dual is V ′ (Rudin, 1991, 3.10). 11 Thus when I is finite, for example, without assuming continuity or completeness or interpersonal comparisons, we find that the social preorder is represented by the mapping µ 7→ RY Pi∈I Ui dµ; in other words, by expected total utility. 3.2 Opinion pooling Here we assume that X is a Boolean algebra of events, understood as sets of states of nature, and the %i are comparative likelihood relations on X, expressing the beliefs of each individual, with %0 expressing those of the social observer. So for events A, B ∈ X, A %i B has the interpretation that, according to i, A is at least as likely as B. Generalising ordinary probability measures, we will be considering representations by vector measures,35 with values in partially ordered vector spaces. In Lemma 23(i) below, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a preorder % on X to be representable by a vector measure f . But in terms of standard axioms of comparative probability (see e.g. Alon and Lehrer, 2014), the existence of such a representation entails that % satisfies Reflexivity, Transitivity, and Generalized Finite Cancellation. Positivity and Non-Triviality are equivalent respectively to the further conditions that f (A) %V 0 for all A ∈ X and that f (A) ≻V 0 for some A ∈ X. We treat Positivity and Non-Triviality as natural but optional assumptions about %, rather than imposing these conditions on f . The main remaining axioms -- Completeness and Monotone Continuity -- are the ones which our use of vector measures is intended to avoid. Our Pareto-style axioms P1 -- P4 may seem as plausible here as in the context of preference aggregation. However, consider Example 20. Let I = {1, 2}. A ball is going to be drawn randomly from an urn containing three balls, red, yellow and blue. Individual 1 privately observes that the ball is not red, and concludes {B} ∼1 {R, Y }. Individual 2 privately observes that the ball is not yellow, and concludes {B} ∼2 {R, Y }. The social observer, privy to each individual's private information, will conclude {B} ≻0 {R, Y }, contrary to P1. The natural reply, though, is that P1 -- P4 are not designed for the problem in which the observer's task is to aggregate the opinions represented by (%i, Ii), where Ii is i's private infor- mation. They are meant for circumstances in which the only data the observer has, or considers relevant, is the %i, say when all private information is either hidden from the observer, or has been made common knowledge. Thus we assume that P1 -- P4 are applicable in at least an important range of cases; see Dietrich and List (2016) for related discussion. Linear opinion pooling is the idea that society's beliefs should be represented by a linear combination of individual beliefs with nonnegative coefficients, and goes back at least to Stone (1961). When each %i can be represented by a probability measure on X, linear pooling was axiomatized by McConway (1981).36 An alternative axiomatization using Pareto-style conditions was given in Mongin (1995) and De Meyer and Mongin (1995), applying the Lyapunov convexity theorem. Further references are given in section 4. Here we give linear pooling results that replace ordinary probability measures with vector measures. We will first extend the approach based on Lyapunov's theorem. However, this requires a finite population, as well as some technical restrictions, so we will go on to explain an alternative approach, still using Pareto-style conditions, that mixes objective and subjective probability, in the spirit of Anscombe-Aumann decision theory. 35These were defined following Example 2. 36In this special case, the linear combination is typically normalized to a convex combination. 12 3.2.1 Lyapunov Our aggregation theorems apply if we assume that the %i are represented by co-convex vector measures. This assumption follows under certain conditions from the Lyapunov convexity theo- rem. The following version is proved in Armstrong and Prikry (1981) (their Theorem 2.2, which allows X more generally to be an F -algebra). Theorem 21 (Lyapunov). Suppose X is a σ-algebra, and {f i : X → R}i∈I is a finite family of finitely additive, bounded, non-atomic signed measures on X. Then the f i are co-convex. With this in mind, we say that a vector measure f : X → V is admissible if V is finite- dimensional, and, with respect to some (hence any) basis of V , each component of f is bounded and non-atomic.37 To illustrate, these conditions are fulfilled by f in Example 2. Then Lya- punov's theorem ensures that f (X) is convex; it also ensures that any finite number of admissible vector measures are co-convex. We thus obtain (for example) this application of Theorem 6. Theorem 22. Suppose that I is finite, and that, for i ∈ I ∪ {0}, %i is a preorder on a σ-algebra X that can be represented by an admissible vector measure fi : X → Vi. Suppose also that P1 -- P4 hold. Then there exists a finite dimensional partially ordered vector space V and, for each i ∈ I, a linear order embedding Li : Vi → V , such that the admissible vector measure Pi∈I Lifi represents %0. So, under the stated assumptions, the social observer's beliefs are given by a linear pooling of individual beliefs. 3.2.2 Convexification Here we give an approach that allows the population to be infinite and that provides an axiomatic basis for the use of vector measures. It mixes objective and subjective probabilities in the style of Anscombe and Aumann (1963). We proceed by embedding X in a convex set X. Here we only assume that X is a Boolean algebra on a set S of states of nature. Say that an extended event is a function F : S → [0, 1] that is constant on each cell of a finite partition A ⊂ X of S. We identify each A ∈ X with the extended event χA given by the characteristic function of A. Let X be the set of extended events; it is a convex subset of the vector space of all functions S → R. A preorder % on X can be understood as a comparative likelihood relation in the following way. Suppose that, for each p ∈ [0, 1], a coin with bias p is going to be tossed, independently of the events encoded in X; let Hp be the event that it lands heads.38 Given F ∈ X, constant on each cell of some partition {E1, . . . , En} ⊂ X of S, we associate the event HF = E1Hp1 ∨ · · · ∨ EnHpn , where pj is the value that F takes on Ej. Thus HF occurs whenever nature selects some event Ej from the partition, and, independently, the coin with bias pj lands heads. F % F ′ holds just in case HF is judged at least as likely as HF ′ .39 So interpreted, % should appropriately take into 37Each component of f Following Armstrong and Prikry (1981), a finitely additive signed measure f j is said to be non-atomic if for every ǫ > 0 there is a finite partition {A1, . . . , An} of X such that for all k the total variation f j(Ak) of Ak under f j is less than ǫ. Note that non-atomicity in this sense has nothing to do with the partial order on V . is automatically a finitely additive signed measure on X. 38At a cost in abstraction, we could avoid the need for infinitely many coins by considering a single sample from [0, 1] with the uniform measure. 39While emphasizing that our conceptual approach is not decision theoretic, % should match the preferences of an agent who gets a prize on heads. 13 account the objective probabilities of the coin tosses; we suggest that the appropriate constraint is strong independence. The following proposition allows us to generate representations of likelihood relations on X by vector measures. Lemma 23. Let X be a Boolean algebra and X the set of extended events. (i) If a preorder % on X satisfies strong independence, its restriction % to X can be represented by a vector measure. Conversely, a preorder % on X can be represented by a vector measure only if it arises in this way. (ii) If a mixture-preserving function f : X → V , with V a vector space, satisfies f (χ∅) = 0, its restriction f to X is a vector measure. Conversely, a function f : X → V is a vector measure only if it arises in this way. Lemma 23, in combination with Lemma 16, yields the following application of Theorem 6. Theorem 24. Let X be a Boolean algebra, and X the space of extended events. For i ∈ I ∪ {0}, let %i be a preorder on X whose restriction to X is %i. Assume that each %i satisfies strong independence, and that the %i together satisfy P1 -- P4. Then there is for each i ∈ I ∪ {0} a vector measure fi : X → Vi that represents %i, and a strictly positive linear map L : VI → V0, with each Li an order embedding, such that f0 = LfI. Let us contrast the two routes to linear pooling. Convexification allows the population to be infinite, and avoids the restriction of the Lyapunov approach to %i with admissible repre- sentations. In addition, Lemma 23 provides necessary and sufficient conditions for a preorder % on X to be represented by a vector measure, whereas no such result has been given for % to be represented by an admissible vector measure. On the other hand, convexification requires extending X to X, along with Pareto and strong independence for the extended preorders. It is hard to see an objection to this extension of Pareto,40 but strong independence has its critics (even while remaining very popular) in the standard decision theoretic version of the Anscombe- Aumann framework.41 Those with similar doubts in our comparative likelihood framework (cf. note 39) might prefer the Lyapunov approach. Finally, for those who prefer to avoid objec- tive probabilities, we note the possibility of imposing convex structure directly on X; compare Ghirardoto et al (2003). 4 Related literature We conclude by relating our results to extant work. In section 2.1 we noted that our use of partially ordered vector spaces generalises some other forms of representation. These include representations with values in a non-Archimedean ordered field F , often used to model failures of continuity (see note 19 for references). Here, F is generally assumed to be an extension of the real numbers, and as such is an ordered real vector space (cf. Example 10). However, advocates of this approach may prefer to rework our results using F , rather than R, as the basic field. This would mean interpreting such conditions as linearity, convexity, and strong independence using coefficients drawn from F .42 We do not pursue this project, but the only results that we do not expect to extend almost verbatim are Theorems 19 and 22. 40We note, however, that if the %i satisfy P1 -- P4, and are extended to strongly independent preorders %i on X, it does not follow that the %i satisfy P1 -- P4. 41See e.g. Gilboa (2009) for discussion. 42Thus, for example, a subset X of an F -vector space is convex over F if and only if, for all x, y ∈ X and all α ∈ F with 0 < α < 1, we have αx + (1 − α)y ∈ X. 14 As already noted, in the special case in which I is finite and Vi = R for each i ∈ I ∪ {0}, Theorem 7 is proved in De Meyer and Mongin (1995, Prop. 1), without requiring DR; note that P4 is vacuous under these assumptions. This is the first result we know of that emphasizes the usefulness of co-convexity in the context of social aggregation. They apply their result to preference aggregation to obtain Harsanyi's theorem, and to opinion pooling using Lyapunov, in the special case in which each %i is represented by a standard probability measure. Zhou (1997) allows I to be infinite, and considers the special case in which X is a mixture set and the fi are mixture-preserving representations with values in R (i.e. von Neumann- Morgenstern expected utility functions),43 so that the %i satisfy strong independence, conti- nuity and completeness. Under these assumptions, his Theorems 1 and 2 are essentially our Theorem 7(a) and (b) respectively.44 He also raises the question of whether, in our terminology, DR can be dropped from Theorem 7(b), and gives an affirmative answer under yet further as- sumptions. Our examples in section 2.3.1 show that the answer is negative in general. But we emphasise that our Theorem 6 and the main part of Theorem 8 do not assume DR. Despite the importance of the problem, the results of Danan et al (2015) are the only ones we know of that generalize Harsanyi's theorem by dropping completeness. They assume a finite population, and take X to be the set of probability measures on a finite set of outcomes. They assume that the %i satisfy strong independence and a slight strengthening of mixture continuity. It follows that the %i have expected multi-utility representations (Shapley and Baucells, 1998; Dubra et al, 2004), and they present their results in such terms. Recall from Example 3 than any multi-representation can be re-interpreted as a representation in a partially ordered vector space. Our Theorem 7(a) and (b) say that, given P1 or P1 and P2, the vector-valued representation of %0 is linearly related to those of the other %i. Danan et al prove essentially this same result in their setting, and go slightly further in describing the components of the linear relation in terms of the original multi-representations. They also explain how these results extend to the case of an infinite population, generalizing Zhou's results to allow for incompleteness (although, unlike Zhou, assuming a finite set of outcomes). Our results differ from theirs in three main ways. First, we do not require continuity; one motivation for this is that in the absence of completeness, continuity is a more problematic assumption than it appears.45 Second, as emphasized in section 3.1, we allow for a much wider range of interpretations of the domain X. Third, while they only consider the axioms P1 -- P2, we consider the effects of adding the standard strong Pareto-style axiom P3, and in addition, the apparently novel P4. This whole package of Pareto-style axioms is plausible, in our view, and essential to those of our results that are arguably the fullest generalizations of Harsanyi. Of course, our results do not wholly replace those of Danan et al (2015), as they study details that arise specifically in the context of continuity and multi-utility representations. But we believe that it is important to consider the full range of Pareto-style conditions, even in that context; our results provide a framework for doing so, although we do not pursue it here. As in Harsanyi's theorem, the results of Zhou (1997), Danan et al (2015) and this paper do not assume interpersonal comparisons. Immediately after the statement of his main theorem, though, Harsanyi (1955) introduces interpersonal comparisons and a form of anonymity, leading to the further conclusion that the social preorder can be represented by the sum of real-valued mixture-preserving individual utility functions that have been normalized to reflect interpersonal comparisons. Generalizations of this version of Harsanyi's result, that assume interpersonal 43As Mongin (2001) proves, each mixture set X maps naturally onto to a convex set X such that any mixture- preserving function on X comes from one on X; thus the use of mixture-preserving functions on mixture sets rather than on convex sets does not give any greater generality. 44The exact statement of Zhou's Theorem 2 is closer to the variant of Theorem 7(b) outlined in section 2.3.1. 45See Dubra (2011) and McCarthy and Mikkola (2018), extending a classic observation of Schmeidler (1971). 15 comparisons and anonymity at the outset but drop one or more of continuity, completeness, strong independence, and the requirement of a finite population, are given in Fleurbaey (2009), Pivato (2013, 2014), and McCarthy et al (2018).46 Generalizations of Harsanyi to the case where preferences are over Anscombe-Aumann or Savage acts, allowing individuals to have different beliefs and values, are well known to lead to impossibility results.47 Our treatment of opinion pooling separately from preference aggregation may therefore be seen as following the advice of, for example, Mongin (1998, pp. 352 -- 3) to aggregate opinion prior to aggregating preferences. The classic axiomatization of linear opinion pooling, when the population is finite and the pi are standard ([0, 1]-valued) probability measures on a σ-algebra, was given in McConway (1981). An axiomatization using analogues of the Pareto-style conditions P1 -- P3 was given in Mongin (1995); see also De Meyer and Mongin (1995). Chambers (2007) extends that approach to axiomatize linear pooling for ordinal probabilities. Extending McConway's approach, linear pooling results for finitely additive probability measures and an infinite population are given in Herzberg (2015) and Nielsen (2019); the latter giving an equivalent result using analogues of P1 and P2. 5 Proofs We begin with some simple observations about convex sets, cones and vector preorders. Lemma 25. Let Z be a nonempty convex set. Then Span(Z − Z) = { λ(z − z′) λ ∈ R, λ > 0, z, z′ ∈ Z }. Proof. The right-hand side is clearly contained in and spans the left-hand side. It suffices to show that it equals its own span. It is clearly closed under scalar multiplication. To show that it is closed under addition, suppose given λ(z − z′) and µ(w − w′) with λ, µ > 0 and z, z′, w, w′ ∈ Z. Then it is easy to check λ(z − z′) + µ(w − w′) = ν(v − v′), for ν := µ + ν, v := λ ν w, and v′ := λ ν w′. Note that ν > 0 and that v, v′ are elements of Z, since it is convex. ν z + µ ν z′ + µ Given a vector space V , recall that C ⊂ V is a convex cone if 0 ∈ C, C + C ⊂ C and λC ⊂ C for all λ > 0. Clearly if C, C ′ ⊂ V are convex cones, then so is C + C ′. The following is well-known; see e.g. Ok (2007, G.1.3). Lemma 26. Let C ⊂ V , where V is a vector space. The binary relation %V on V defined by v %V w ⇔ v − w ∈ C is a linear preorder if and only if C is a convex cone. Conversely, any linear preorder on V is of this form. Lemma 27. Suppose Z is a nonempty subset of a vector space V , and % is a preorder on Z that satisfies strong independence. Let C := { λ(x − y) λ ∈ R, λ > 0, x, y ∈ Z, x % y }. Then C is a convex cone in V . Equip V with the linear preorder %V defined by v %V w ⇐⇒ v − w ∈ C. Then the inclusion ι : Z → V represents %. Proof. It is clear that 0 ∈ C, and that for λ > 0, λC ⊂ C. To show that C + C ⊂ C, let v, w ∈ C. Then v = λ(x − y) and w = µ(x′ − y′) for some λ, µ > 0, x, x′, y, y′ ∈ Z with x % y and x′ % y′. 46While it would be straightforward to add interpersonal comparisons and anonymity to the results of this paper when I is finite, there is a well known incompatibility between full anonymity and Pareto when I is infinite. This is avoided in Pivato (2014) by restricting to finite anonymity, and in McCarthy et al (2018) by restricting to social lotteries in which only finitely many individuals have a chance of existing. 47From among a very large body of literature, see e.g. Broome (1990); Mongin (1995, 1998); Mongin and Pivato (2015); and Zuber (2016). 16 We have v + w = (λ + µ)h(cid:0) λ λ+µ x + µ λ+µ x′(cid:1) − (cid:0) λ λ+µ y + µ λ+µ y′(cid:1)i. λ+µ . Since % satisfies strong independence, we have αx + (1 − α)x′ % αy + (1 − α)x′ Let α = λ and αy + (1 − α)x′ % αy + (1 − α)y′, and thus αx + (1 − α)x′ % αy + (1 − α)y′. The displayed equation then shows that v + w ∈ C, establishing that C is a convex cone. We now show that for x, y ∈ Z, x % y ⇔ x %V y. Clearly x % y ⇒ x − y ∈ C ⇒ x %V y. Conversely, suppose x %V y. Then x− y ∈ C, hence there exist λ > 0, x′, y′ ∈ Z with x′ % y′ and x−y = λ(x′−y′). Letting α = 1 1+λ , this rearranges to αx+(1−α)y′ = αy+(1−α)x′. Since x′ % y′ and % satisfies strong independence, we have αx + (1 − α)x′ % αx + (1 − α)y′ = αy + (1 − α)x′. By strong independence again, we must have x % y. Recall that we write 1i : Vi → VI for the natural embedding of Vi into VI. Proof of Theorem 6. First let us verify that, in each case, the right-hand side entails the left- hand side. So suppose we have a partially ordered vector space (V, %V ) and a linear L : VI → V such that LfI represents %0. Recall that we equip VI with the product partial order %P. Suppose first that x ∼i y for every i ∈ I. Then fI(x) = fI(y), hence LfI(x) = LfI(y). Since LfI represents %0, we find that x ∼0 y. Therefore P1 holds. Next, suppose that L is positive, and suppose x %i y for every i ∈ I. Then fI(x) %P fI(y), hence LfI(x) %V LfI(y), so x %0 y. Thus P2 holds as well as P1. Similarly, suppose that L is strictly positive. If x %i y for all i ∈ I and x ≻j y for some j ∈ I, then fI(x) ≻P fI(y), whence LfI(x) ≻V LfI(y) and x ≻0 y; thus P3 holds. This covers the right-to-left directions in (a) -- (c). As for (d), suppose that L is strictly positive and each Li is an order embedding. Suppose that x %i y for all i ∈ I \ {j} and x fj y. This implies that fi(x) %Vi fi(y) for all i ∈ I \ {j} and fj(x) fVj fj(y). We can therefore write fI(x) − fI(y) = v1 + v2 with v1 %P 0 and v2 = 1j(fj(x) − fj(y)) fP 0. Since L is strictly positive, we have L(v1) %V 0; since Lj represents %Vj , we have L(v2) fV 0. Therefore L(fI(x) − fI(y)) = L(v1) + L(v2) 6-V 0. This implies x 6-0 y. This shows that P4 must hold as well as P1 -- P3. Conversely, now, we show that the left-hand side entails the right in each case. Assume P1. Define subsets of VI: C0 = { λ(fI(x) − fI(y)) λ > 0, x, y ∈ X, x %0 y } CP = { v v ∈ VI, v %P 0 } C = C0 + CP . We first prove that these are convex cones. Let X ′ = (fI, f0)(X) ⊂ VI × V0. By the co-convexity assumption, X ′ is convex. Let πI and π0 be the projections of VI × V0 onto VI and V0 respectively. Let %′ be the preorder on X ′ represented by the restriction of π0 to X ′: x %′ y ⇐⇒ π0(x′) %V0 π0(y′). This %′ satisfies strong independence, as in Lemma 16(i). Define a subset of VI × V0: C ′ 0 = { λ(x′ − y′) λ > 0, x′, y′ ∈ X ′, x′ %′ y′ }. By Lemma 27, C ′ have 0 is a convex cone. Note that, for x′ = (fI, f0)(x) and y′ = (fI, f0)(y) ∈ X ′, we x′ %′ y′ ⇐⇒ π0(x′) %V0 π0(y′) ⇐⇒ f0(x) %V0 f0(y) ⇐⇒ x %0 y. (1) This shows that C0 = πI(C ′ cone by Lemma 26. Therefore the sum C is also a convex cone. 0), and therefore that C0 is a convex cone. Meanwhile, CP is a convex Next we prove x %0 y ⇐⇒ fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0. (2) 17 The left-to-right direction is obvious from the definition of C0. For the converse, we first show that πI is injective on Y := Span(X ′ − X ′). Since πI is linear and Y is a vector space, it suffices to show that if πI(v) = 0 for some v ∈ Y , then v = 0. So suppose πI(v) = 0. By Lemma 25, we can write v = λ(a′ − b′), with a′, b′ ∈ X ′, λ > 0; by definition of X ′, we can write a′ = (fI(a), f0(a)) and b′ = (fI(b), f0(b)) with a, b ∈ X. Then πI(v) = 0 implies fI(a) = fI(b); so, by P1, a ∼0 b, and hence f0(a) = f0(b). Therefore a′ = b′ and v = 0, establishing injectivity of πI on Y . 0), C ′ Now suppose fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0. Let x′ = (fI, f0)(x) and y′ = (fI, f0)(y). Note that 0 ⊂ Y , and πI is injective on 0 implies x′ %′ y′, and πI(x′ − y′) = fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0. Since x′ − y′ ∈ Y , C0 = πI(C ′ Y , we can conclude that x′ − y′ ∈ C ′ 0. By Lemma 27, however, x′ − y′ ∈ C ′ by (1) we obtain x %0 y. This establishes the right-to-left direction in (2). With these preliminaries, we now prove the left-to-right direction in part (a). Assuming P1, we define a partially ordered vector space (V, %V ) as follows. We first let V be the quotient of VI by the subspace C0 ∩ −C0, and let L : VI → V be the quotient map. L(C0) is a convex cone in V , so it defines a linear preorder %V on V , by Lemma 26. Namely, we have L(v) %V L(w) ⇐⇒ L(v − w) ∈ L(C0) ⇐⇒ v − w ∈ C0. It follows that %V is a partial order: if L(v) ∼V L(w) then v − w ∈ C0 ∩ −C0, so L(v) = L(w). We claim that L : VI → V is the required map for part (a): that is, we claim that LfI represents %0. Suppose first that x %0 y. Then fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0, so LfI(x) %V LfI(y). Conversely, if LfI(x) %V LfI(y), then fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0. Therefore, using (2), we find x %0 y, as desired. For part (b), further assuming P2, we instead define V to be the quotient of VI by C ∩ −C. We let L : VI → V be the quotient map, and now we equip V with the linear partial order %V defined by L(v) %V L(w) ⇐⇒ L(v − w) ∈ L(C) ⇐⇒ v − w ∈ C. (3) It is clear from the fact that C contains CP that L is positive. It remains to prove that LfI represents %0. Suppose first that x %0 y. Then fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0 ⊂ C, so LfI(x) %V LfI(y). Conversely, if LfI(x) %V LfI(y), then fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C. We may therefore write fI(x) − fI(y) = v0 + vP for some v0 ∈ C0, vP ∈ CP . Solving this equation for vP , we find vP ∈ Span(fI(X) − fI(X)). Since fI(X) is convex, Lemma 25 implies vP = λ(fI(x′) − fI(y′)) for some λ > 0, x′, y′ ∈ X. Since vP ∈ CP , P2 implies x′ %0 y′, hence, by (2), vP ∈ C0. This implies fI(x) − fI(y) ∈ C0, and hence by (2) again, x %0 y. For parts (c) and (d), we use the same V , L, and %V as in part (b). For part (c), it only remains to show that if P1 -- P3 hold, then L is strictly positive. As before, L is positive, and %V is a partial order; because of this, it suffices to show that, for v ∈ VI, v ≻P 0 rules out Lv = 0. Suppose on the contrary that Lv = 0. Then, by the way L was defined, we must have v ∈ C ∩−C. We can therefore write −v = v0 + vP with v0 ∈ C0 and vP ∈ CP . Since v0 ∈ C0, we can further write v0 = λ(fI(x) − fI(y)) with λ > 0, x %0 y. Rearranging, we find fI(y) − fI(x) = 1 λ (v + vP ). So if v ≻P 0, we have fI(y) − fI(x) ≻P 0. P3 yields y ≻0 x, a contradiction. Finally, for part (d), it suffices to show that, if P1 -- P4 hold, then every Li is an order embedding: v %Vi 0 ⇔ Li(v) %V 0. Since, as just established, L is strictly positive, so is each Li, and it remains to show that if Li(v) %V 0, then v %Vi 0. Suppose therefore that Li(v) %V 0. That is, L1iv %V 0, so by (3), 1iv ∈ C and we can write 1iv = v0 + vP for some v0 ∈ C0, vP ∈ CP . We may further write v0 = λ(fI(x) − fI(y)) for some λ > 0, x %0 y. Rearranging, we find fI(y) − fI(x) = 1 λ (−1iv + vP ). Therefore, fj(y) %Vj fj(x) for all j ∈ I \ {i}. By P3 and P4 respectively, we will have y 6-0 x (a contradiction) if fi(y) ≻Vi fi(x) or fi(y) fVi fi(x); therefore we must have fi(x) %Vi fi(y). Now, by choice of v0 and vP , v = λ(fi(x) − fi(y)) + (vP )i; both terms on the right are %Vi 0, so we find v %Vi 0, as desired. The proof of Theorem 7 rests on the following 'abstract Harsanyi theorem'. 18 Theorem 28. Let X be a nonempty set. Let Y and Z be vector spaces and let f : X → Y , g : X → Z be co-convex. Then g(x) = g(x′) =⇒ f (x) = f (x′) for all x, x′ ∈ X (4) if and only if f = Lg + y0 for some linear L : Z → Y and some y0 ∈ Y . Moreover, the restriction of L to Span(g(X) − g(X)) is uniquely determined. Proof. To take the last statement first, suppose that f = Lg + y0 and also f = L′g + y′ 0. Subtracting, we see that L and L′ differ by the constant y′ 0 − y0 on g(X), and therefore they are equal on Span(g(X) − g(X)). For the first statement, it is clear that (4) holds if f is of the form f = Lg + y0. For the converse, let X ′ := (f, g)(X); it is a convex set by assumption. Let A := Span(X ′ − X ′); it is a linear subspace of Y × Z. In light of Lemma 25 applied to X ′, the condition (4) is equivalent to the condition that A contains no elements of the form (y, 0) with y 6= 0. Since A is a linear subspace, we find that (y, z), (y′, z) ∈ A =⇒ y = y′. A is therefore the graph of a partial function L from Z to Y . By definition, the domain of L is the projection of A to Z, namely Span(g(X) − g(X)), and L is characterized by the equation A = {(L(z), z) : z ∈ Span(g(X) − g(X))}. Also, L is a linear function since A is a linear subspace. Extend L arbitrarily to a linear function from Z to Y . Fix (y, z) ∈ X ′ and set y0 = y − L(z). Then for any x ∈ X, we have f (x) = L(g(x)) + y0. Proof of Theorem 7. Note that, if LfI + b represents %0, then so does LfI. Thus the right-to-left direction in each part is a special case of the corresponding claim in Theorem 6. For the left-to-right directions, assume for the remainder that P1 holds. This implies fI(x) = fI(x′) =⇒ f0(x) = f0(x′) for x, x′ ∈ X. Co-convexity of the fi is equivalent to co-convexity of fI and f0. Theorem 28 therefore yields a linear map L : VI → V0 and some b ∈ V0 such that f0 = LfI + b, establishing part (a). Let v ∈ VI. By the co-convexity assumption, fI(X) is convex, so DR and Lemma 25 imply that there exist x, y ∈ X, λ > 0 such that fI(x) − fI(y) = λv. Since LfI represents %0, x %0 y ⇐⇒ Lv %V0 0. We have v %P 0 ⇔ x %i y for every i ∈ I. If P2 holds, v %P 0 ⇒ x %0 y; if P3 holds v ≻P 0 ⇒ x ≻0 y. Using the displayed equivalence, if P2 holds, L is positive, and if P2 -- P3 hold, L is strictly positive. This establishes (b) -- (c). Now assume P1 -- P4 hold. By Theorem 6(d), there exists a partially ordered vector space (V ′, %V ′) and a linear map L′ : VI → V ′ such that L′fI represents %0, with every L′ i an order embedding. Let v ∈ Vi. By convexity of fI(X), DR and Lemma 25 again, there exist x, y ∈ X, iv %V ′ 0 ⇐⇒ L′fI(x) %V ′ λ > 0 such that fI(x) − fI(y) = λ1iv. Then v %Vi 0 ⇐⇒ L′ L′fI(y) ⇐⇒ x %0 y ⇐⇒ f0(x) %V0 f0(y) ⇐⇒ LfI(x) %V0 LfI(y) ⇐⇒ Liv %V0 0. This shows that Li represents %Vi. Since V0 and Vi are partially ordered, it also shows that ker Li = {0}: Liv = 0 ⇐⇒ Liv ∼V0 0 ⇐⇒ v ∼Vi 0 ⇐⇒ v = 0. Therefore Li is injective, and Li is an order embedding, establishing (d). Proof of Theorem 8. For the right-to-left direction, suppose we are given V , gi, and S satisfying the three conditions (a) -- (c), or even just (a) and (b). Suppose x, y ∈ X with x %i y for all i ∈ I. 19 Since gi represents %i, this implies gI(x) − gI(y) %P 0, where now %P is the product partial order on Qi∈I V . Since gI(x) − gI(y) ∈ Y := Qi∈I Span(gi(X) − gi(X)), and S is assumed strictly positive on Y , we find SgI(x) %V SgI(y), and since SgI represents %0, this implies x %0 y. This establishes P1 and P2. If x ≻i y for some i ∈ I, then a similar argument yields x ≻0 y, and hence P3. For P4, suppose x %i y for all i ∈ I \ {j} and x fj y. Let 1j be the inclusion of V into Qi∈I V as the jth factor. Set v := gj(x) − gj(y), so that v fV 0. We may write gI(x) − gI(y) = vP + 1jv with vP %P 0, and vP , 1jv ∈ Y . Since S is strictly positive on Y , we have SvP %V 0, and since S extends summation we have S1jv = v fV 0. Therefore (since %V is a linear preorder) we have SvP + S1jv 6-V 0, and since SgI represents %0 we find x 6-0 y, as desired. Conversely, suppose that P1 -- P4 hold. From Theorem 6(d), there is a strictly positive linear map L : VI → V with values in some partially ordered vector space V , such that LfI represents %0 and every Li is an order embedding.48 This implies that gi := Lifi is a representation of of %i with values in V for each i ∈ I. Together the gi define gI : X → Qi∈I V . commutative diagram. We now define the map S : Qi∈I V → V . The construction is illustrated by the following X fI Qi∈I Vi gI (Li) Qi∈I V ′ i L S1 V S S2 Qi∈I V Li∈I V Here, let V ′ i := Li(Vi); it is a subspace of V order-isomorphic to Vi. (Note that Li is injective, since it is an order embedding.) The Li together define an isomorphism (Li) : Qi∈I Vi → Qi∈I V ′ i . On the other hand, L is a map from VI = Qi∈I Vi to V . We therefore obtain a map S1 : Qi∈I V ′ i → V by S1 = L ◦ (Li)−1. Next, we have the summation S2 : Li∈I V → V . The domains of S1 and S2 are both subspaces of Qi∈I V . The intersection of their domains is Li∈I V ′ (v)) = v (where here 1i is the inclusion of Vi into Qi∈I Vi). This shows that S1 and S2 coincide on each i , and therefore on Li∈I V ′ V ′ i . Therefore there exists a linear map S : Qi∈I V → V that extends both S1 and S2. By construction, gI = (Li)fI and therefore SgI = LfI. Therefore g0 := SgI represents %0, as i . Given v ∈ V ′ i , L(1iL−1 i required for part (a). For part (b) it remains to show that S is strictly positive on Y . Note that in the commutative diagram defining S, the horizontal map (Li) : Qi∈I Vi → Qi∈I V is an order embedding, under which Y is the image of Y ′ := Qi∈I Span(fi(X) − fi(X)). Therefore S is strictly positive on Y if and only if L is strictly positive on Y ′. But L is strictly positive on VI, which contains Y ′. Part (c) is straightforward from the fact that fI and f0 are co-convex and gI and g0 are linear transforms of fI. For the last claim of the theorem, given DR as well as P1 -- P4, Theorem 7(d) provides a linear L : VI → V0 such that f0 = LfI + b for some b ∈ V0. Repeating the construction above, now with V = V0, we obtain gi and S satisfying conditions (b) and (c) but instead of (a) we have f0 = LfI + b = SgI + b. However, picking any i ∈ I, we can replace gi by gi − b to obtain f0 = SgI. 48Anticipating the proof of Theorem 19, we note that the following construction of the gi and S does not depend on the Vi or V being partially ordered, rather than merely preordered. 20 Proof of Lemma 11. We have f (x) = f (x′) ⇐⇒ x ∼ x′ ⇐⇒ g(x) = g(x′). Since f and g are pervasive, Theorem 28 tells us that there is a unique linear L : V → V ′ and b ∈ V ′ such that g = Lf + b, and also a unique linear L′ : V ′ → V and b′ ∈ V such that f = L′g + b′. (Note that here b and b′ are uniquely determined as well as L and L′.) Together we find f = L′Lf +(L′b+b′). We also have f = idV f , so the uniqueness statement in Theorem 28 implies that L′L = idV . A similar argument gives LL′ = idV ′ , showing that L is bijective. It remains to show that L is an order isomorphism: for all v1, v2 ∈ V , we want v1 %V v2 ⇐⇒ Lv1 %V ′ Lv2. By Lemma 25, and the fact that f is pervasive, there exist x1, x2 ∈ X and λ > 0 such that v1 −v2 = λ(f (x1)−f (x2)). We have v1 %V v2 ⇐⇒ f (x1) %V f (x2) ⇐⇒ x1 % x2 ⇐⇒ g(x1) %V ′ g(x2) ⇐⇒ Lf (x1) %V ′ Lf (x2) ⇐⇒ L(v1) %V ′ L(v2), as desired. Proof of Proposition 12. Span(LfI(X) − LfI(X)) = L Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) by the linearity of L, and Span(fI(X) − fI(X)) = VI, by DR. Thus Span(LfI(X) − LfI(X)) = L(VI), showing that LfI : VI → L(VI) is pervasive. So too is L′fI : VI → L′(VI). We next show that LfI and L′fI are co-convex. Fix any x1, x2 ∈ X and α ∈ [0, 1]. Since fI(X) is convex, there exists x3 ∈ X such that fI(x3) = αfI(x1) + (1 − α)fI(x2). Therefore LfI(x3) = αLfI(x1) + (1 − α)LfI(x2), and similarly L′fI(x3) = αL′fI(x1) + (1 − α)L′fI(x2). Therefore (LfI, L′fI)(x3) = α(LfI, L′fI)(x1) + (1 − α)(LfI, L′fI)(x2). Thus LfI and L′fI are co-convex. By Lemma 11 there is therefore a unique linear order isomorphism M : L(VI) → L′(VI) and b ∈ L′(VI) such that L′fI = M LfI + b. Suppose given v ∈ VI; by DR and Lemma 25 there are x1, x2 ∈ X, and λ > 0, such that v = λ(fI(x1) − fI(x2)). From the fact that L′fI = M LfI + b it follows that L′v = M Lv, as required. Proof of Proposition 14. Suppose that f0 = LfI+b and also f0 = L′fI+b′, so we have to show L = L′ and b = b′. By DR and Lemma 25, we can write any v ∈ VI in the form v = λ(fI(x1) − fI(x2)), with x1, x2 ∈ X and λ > 0. Applying L or L′ we find Lv = λ(f0(x1) − f0(x2)) = L′v; therefore L = L′. Moreover, we have b = f0(x1) − LfI(x1) = f0(x1) − L′fI(x1) = b′. Proof of Proposition 15. First we claim that g0 and g′ 0 are co-convex. Fix x1, x2 ∈ X and α ∈ [0, 1]. Since fI and g0 are co-convex, there exists x3 ∈ X such that fI(x3) = αfI(x1) + (1 − α)fI(x2) and g0(x3) = αg0(x1) + (1 − α)g0(x2). Similarly there exists x′ 3 ∈ X such that fI(x′ 0(x2). By Theorem 8, P1 holds. Since fI(x′ 3) = αg0(x1) + (1 − α)g0(x2), establishing that g0 and g′ 3) = fI(x3), we must, by P1, have g0(x′ 3) = αfI(x1) + (1 − α)fI(x2) and g′ 3) = g0(x3). Therefore g0(x′ 0(x′ 3) = αg′ 0(x1) + (1 − α)g′ 0 are co-convex. Thus, by Lemma 11, there is a unique linear order isomorphism L : V → V ′ and unique b0 ∈ V ′ such that g′ 0 = Lg0 + b0. By assumption, for each i ∈ I, fi and gi are co-convex, and (by DR) fi is pervasive. As described before Lemma 11, for any x0 ∈ X, gi − gi(x0) is a pervasive map X → Span(gi(X) − gi(X)). Since fi is also pervasive, Lemma 11 gives a unique linear order isomorphism Mi : Vi → Span(gi(X) − gi(X)) and unique ci ∈ V such that gi − gi(x0) = Mifi + ci. Thus gi = Mifi + ci + gi(x0). It is easy to verify from the uniqueness claim in Lemma 11 that both Mi and ci + gi(x0) are uniquely determined by this equation, independently of x0. As i varies these together define a ∈ Qi∈I V and a linear order isomorphism M : VI → Qi∈I Span(gi(X) − gi(X)) such that gI = M fI +a. Now fix i ∈ I and x ∈ X. By DR and Lemma 25, there exist y, z ∈ X and λ > 0 such that λ(fI(y) − fI(z)) = 1ifi(x), where 1i is the inclusion of Vi into VI. We therefore have λ(gI(y) − gI(z)) = λ(M fI(y) − M fI(z)) = M 1ifi(x) = 1iMifi(x) = 1i(gi(x) − ai), where in the last two terms 1i is the inclusion of V into Qi∈I V as the ith factor. Applying S and using the fact that it extends summation we find g0(y) − g0(z) = SgI(y) − SgI(z) = (gi(x) − ai)/λ. 21 A parallel argument gives g′ i)/λ for some a′ 0(z) = Lg0(y) − Lg0(z); so in combination we find 0(z) = (g′ 0(y)−g′ i(x)−a′ i ∈ V ′. Since g′ 0 = Lg0 +b0, we have g′ 0(y) − g′ Lgi(x) − Lai = g′ i(x) − a′ i. (5) Rearranging, g′ g′ i(x) − Lgi(x) for every x ∈ X, and is uniquely determined by this equation. i − Lai). We set bi = (a′ i = Lgi + (a′ i − Lai) ∈ V ′. Note that by (5), bi = For the last statement, suppose first that v ∈ Li∈I V ′. We have LS((L−1vi)i∈I) = L(X i∈I L−1(vi)) = X i∈I LL−1(vi) = X i∈I vi = S′(v), where every sum has finitely many non-zero terms. On the other hand, suppose v ∈ Span(g′ I(X)− g′ I(X)). Using Lemma 25 we can write v in the form v = λ(g′ I(y)) with x, y ∈ X and λ > 0. By equation (5), we have L−1vi = λ(gi(xi) − gi(yi)), so S((L−1vi)i∈I) = λ(g0(x) − g0(y)) and then LS((L−1vi)i∈I) = λ(g′ I(x) − g′ 0(y)) = S′v. 0(x) − g′ Proof of Lemma 16. Suppose that % is a preorder on X. It is straightforward to check that % satisfies strong independence if it has a mixture-preserving representation. Conversely, if % satisfies strong independence, let V be the vector space Span X and ι : X → V the inclusion. Taking Z = X in Lemma 27, % and ι define a convex cone C in V and a linear preorder %V such that ι then represents %. Let V be the quotient of V by the subspace C ∩ −C, and let L : V → V be the quotient map. Define a linear partial order %V on V by L(v) %V L(w) ⇔ v − w ∈ C. It is clear that L is a representation of %V , hence Lι is a representation of %, with values in the partially ordered vector space V . To complete the proof of part (i), it suffices to apply the construction of pervasive representations described before Lemma 11. For part (ii), fix any x, y ∈ X and α ∈ [0, 1]. Let z = αx + (1 − α)y. From the fact that the fi are mixture preserving, it follows that, for all i, fi(z) = αfi(x) + (1 − α)fi(y), and therefore α(fi)i∈I (x) + (1 − α)(fi)i∈I (y) = (fi)i∈I (z), establishing that (fi)i∈I (X) is convex. Proof of Theorem 17. By Lemma 16, we can choose co-convex, mixture-preserving representa- tions Fi : X → Vi, for i ∈ I ∪ {0}. We use these Fi as the 'fi' in Theorem 8, which then yields V , gi : X → V and S : Qi∈I V → V . For our current purposes we define fi := gi. The only thing left to show is that the gi are mixture-preserving. This follows from the construction of the gi in Theorem 8, but here is a direct argument. Fix x, y ∈ X and α ∈ [0, 1]. By Theorem 8(c), gi and Fi are co-convex. So there exists z ∈ X such that gi(z) = αgi(x) + (1 − α)gi(y) and Fi(z) = αFi(x) + (1 − α)Fi(y). Since Fi is mixture preserving, the second of these equations holds if and only if Fi(z) = Fi(αx + (1 − α)y), or equivalently if and only if z ∼i αx + (1 − α)y. But then, since gi represents %i, gi(z) = gi(αx + (1 − α)y), and therefore gi(αx + (1 − α)y) = αgi(x) + (1 − α)gi(y), as desired. Proof of Theorem 19. Lemma 18 yields an expectational representation fi : X → Vi of each %i; suppose fi(µ) = RY ui dµ. Let V i = Vi/∼Vi be the partially ordered quotient of Vi, and f i : X → V i be the composition of fi with the quotient map; f i also represents %i. Since the fi are expectational, they are mixture preserving, and it follows from Lemma 16 that they are co-convex; then the f i are co-convex as well. By Theorem 6(d) there is a partially ordered vector space V and a strictly positive linear map L : V I → V such that Lf I represents %0, and such that the components Li : V i → V are order embeddings. Now define a preorder %V on V := VI by x %V y ⇐⇒ Lx %V Ly, where x, y ∈ V I are the images of x, y ∈ VI. Let L denote the set-theoretic identity map VI → V . Since L is strictly positive, so is L. Since each Li is an order-embedding, so is each Li (note L is injective). Moreover, LfI represents %0. If V ′ is the i 22 given separating vector space of linear functionals on Vi, then V ′ := Li∈I V ′ is a separating vector space of linear functionals on VI, so on V ; with respect to V ′, we have fI(µ) = RY uI dµ. Because L is the set-theoretic identity map we have LfI(µ) = LRY uI dµ = RY LuI dµ. We now appeal to the proof of the left-to-right direction of Theorem 8: the construction (which works even though Vi and V are now merely preordered vector spaces) takes as input fI and L and yields gi : X → V representing %i (for i ∈ I ∪ {0}) and S : Qi∈I V → V extending summation such that g0 = Sg. Moreover, by construction gi = Lifi for i ∈ I, and g0 = LfI. We find gi(µ) = Li RY ui dµ = RY Liui dµ, and, as already stated, g0(µ) = RY LuI dµ. Defining U0 = LuI and Ui = Liui for i ∈ I, it remains to show that U0 = SUI, i.e. that LuI = S(Liui). And indeed S is constructed so that S ◦ (Li) = L. i Proof of Theorem 22. Since Lyapunov's Theorem (Theorem 21) implies that the fi are co-convex, Theorem 6 yields the vector space V and linear map L with components Li. The only additional points to be checked are that V can be taken to be finite-dimensional and that Pi∈I Lifi is an admissible vector measure. On the first point, one can harmlessly replace V by its subspace L(VI), since the latter contains the image of every Li; since, under the hypotheses of the theorem, VI is finite-dimensional, so is L(VI). (Alternatively, V as constructed in the proof of Theorem 6 will already be finite dimensional.) On the second point, given that the fi are admissible, it is straightforward to verify that their product fI : X → VI is admissible, and so then is the linear transform LfI = Pi∈I Lifi of fI. Proof of Lemma 23. We begin with part (ii). Given f , we have to check that its restriction f to X is additive. For A, B disjoint in X we have 1 2 f (A ∪ B) = 1 2 f (χA + χB) = 1 2 f (χA + χB) + 1 = 1 2 f (χA) + 1 2 f (χ∅) = f ( 1 2 χA + 1 2 χB) 2 (f (A) + f (B)). 2 f (χB) = 1 Hence f (A ∪ B) = f (A) + f (B). Here we have used the fact that X is embedded into X by A 7→ χA, the assumption that f (χ∅) = 0, the mixture preservation property (twice), and again the embedding of X. Conversely, suppose given a vector measure f : X → V . We essentially define f : X → V by setting f (F ) = RS F df for each F ∈ X. Explicitly, suppose F is constant on each cell of the partition {E1, . . . , En} ⊂ X of S, taking value pj on Ej . Then set f (F ) = Pn j=1 pjf (Ej). This f is clearly mixture preserving, and the restriction of f to X is f . For part (i), suppose given % satisfying strong independence; by Lemma 16, it admits a mixture-preserving representation f : X → V . Subtracting a constant, we can assume f (χ∅) = 0. Thus, by part (ii), f restricts to a vector measure f on X, which automatically represents %. Conversely, if % can be represented by a vector measure f : X → V , then, by part (ii), f extends to a mixture-preserving function f : X → V ; the preorder % on X represented by f satisfies strong independence, by Lemma 16, and its restriction to X is %. Proof of Theorem 24. From Lemma 16 we get co-convex mixture-preserving representations f i : X → Vi of each %i. Subtracting a constant in each case, we can assume f i(χ∅) = 0. Theorem 6(d) yields a strictly positive linear map L : VI → V , for some partially ordered vector space V , with every Li an order embedding, and such that Lf I represents %0. By Lemma 23(ii), the f i restrict to representations fi of the %i by vector measures. We recover the statement of the theorem by redefining V0 := V and f 0 := Lf I. 23 References Alon, S., Lehrer, E., 2014. Subjective multi-prior probability: a representation of a partial like- lihood relation. Journal of Economic Theory 151: 476 -- 492. Anscombe, F., Aumann, R., 1963. A definition of subjective probability. The Annals of Mathe- matical Statistics 34: 199 -- 205. Armstrong, T., Prikry, K., 1981. Liapounoff's theorem for nonatomic, finitely-additive, bounded, finite-dimensional, vector-valued measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Soci- ety 266: 499 -- 514. Aumann, R., 1962. Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30: 455 -- 462. Baucells, M., Shapley, L. 2008. Multiperson utility. Games and Economic Behavior 62: 329 -- 347. Benci, V., Horsten, L., Wenmackers, S., 2018a. Infinitesimal probabilities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69:509 -- 552. Benci, V., Horsten, L., Wenmackers, S., 2018b. Non-Archimedean probability. arXiv:1106.1524 [math.PR] Bewley, T., 2002. Knightian decision theory. Part I. Decisions in Economics and Finance 25(2): 79 -- 110. [Originally appeared in 1986 as Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807, Yale University.] Blackwell, D., Girshick, M., 1954. Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. New York, John Wiley. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E., 1989. An overview of lexicographic choice under un- certainty. Annals of Operations Research 19: 231 -- 246. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E., 1991a. Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59(1): 61 -- 79. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., Dekel, E., 1991b. Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica 59(1): 81 -- 98. Borie, D., 2016. Lexicographic expected utility without completeness. Theory and Decision 81, 167 -- 176. Brandenburger, A., Friedenberg, A., Keisler, H. J., 2008. Admissibility in games. Econometrica 76(2): 307 -- 352. Brickhill, H., Horsten, L., 2018. Popper functions, lexicographical probability, and non- Archimedean probability. arXiv:1608.02850 [math.LO] Broome, J., 1990. Bolker-Jeffrey expected utility theory and axiomatic utilitarianism. Review of Economic Studies 57: 477 -- 502. Chambers, C., 2007. An ordinal characterization of the linear opinion pool. Economic Theory 33: 457 -- 474. Danan, E., Gajdos, T., Tallon, J.-M., 2013. Aggregating sets of von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities. Journal of Economic Theory 148: 663 -- 688. Danan, E., Gajdos, T., Tallon, J.-M., 2015. Harsanyi's aggregation theorem with incomplete preferences. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 7(1): 61 -- 69. De Meyer, B., Mongin, P., 1995. A note on affine aggregation. Economics Letters 47: 177 -- 183. Diamond, P. 1965. The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33: 170 -- 177. Dietrich, F., List, C., 2016. Probabilistic opinion pooling. In A. H´ajek and C. Hitchcock eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Probability, Oxford University Press, 2016, 518 -- 19. Dubra, J., 2011. Continuity and completeness under risk. Mathematical Social Sciences 61: 80 -- 81. Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., Ok, E., 2004. Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. Journal of Economic Theory 115: 118 -- 133. Evren, O., 2008. On the existence of expected multi-utility representations. Economic Theory 24 35: 575 -- 592. Evren, O., 2014. Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations. Journal of Economic Theory 151: 30 -- 63. Fine, T., 1973. Theories of Probability, New York, Academic Press. Fishburn, P., 1971. A study of lexicographic expected utility. Management Science 17: 672 -- 678. Fishburn, P., 1982. The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht, Reidel. Fishburn, P., 1984. On Harsanyi's utilitarian cardinal welfare theorem. Theory and Decision 17: 21 -- 28. Fleurbaey, M., 2009. Two variants of Harsanyi's aggregation theorem. Economics Letters 105, 300 -- 302. Galaabaatar, T., Karni, E., 2012. Expected multi-utility representations. Mathematical Social Sciences 64: 242 -- 246. Galaabaatar, T., Karni, E., 2013. Subjective expected utility with incomplete preferences. Econo- metrica 81: 255 -- 284. Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Siniscalchi, M., 2003. A subjective spin on roulette wheels. Econometrica 71: 1897 -- 1908. Gilboa, I., 2009. Theory of Decision under Uncertainty, Cambridge University Press. Gilboa, I., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Schmeidler, D., 2010. Objective and subjective ratio- nality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica 78: 755 -- 770. Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D., 1989. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141 -- 153. Halpern, J., 2003. Reasoning about Uncertainty, MIT Press. Halpern, J., 2010. Lexicographic probability, conditional probability, and nonstandard probabil- ity. Games and Economic Behavior 68: 155 -- 179. Hammond P., 1994a. Elementary non-Archimedean representations of probability for decision theory and games. In: Humphreys, P. (Ed.), Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher vol. 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 25 -- 49. Hammond, P., 1994b. Consequentialism, non-Archimedean probabilities, and lexicographic ex- pected utility. Operations Research ?93. A. Bachem, U. Derigs, M. Junger and R. Schrader. Heidelberg, Physica: 219 -- 250. Hammond, P., 1999. Non-Archimedean subjective probabilities in decision theory and games. Mathematical Social Sciences 38(2): 139 -- 156. Hara, K., Ok, E., Riella, G., http://economics.mit.edu/files/12659 2016. Coalitional expected multi-utility theory. Harsanyi, J., 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63, 309 -- 21. Harsanyi, J., 1967 -- 1968. Games with incomplete information played by "Bayesian" players, I -- III. Management Science 14: 159 -- 182, 320 -- 334, 486 -- 502. Hausner, M., 1954. Multidimensional utilities. In Thrall, R., Coombs, C. and Davis, R. eds. Decision Processes John Wiley. Hausner, M., Wendel, J., 1952. Ordered vector spaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 3, 977 -- 982. Herzberg, F., 2009. Elementary non-Archimedean utility theory. Mathematical Social Sciences 58: 8 -- 14. Herzberg, F., 2015. Aggregating infinitely many probability measures. Theory and Decision 78: 319 -- 337. Herstein, I., Milnor, J., 1953. An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 21: 291 -- 297. Insua, D., 1992. On the foundations of decision making under partial information. Theory and 25 Decision 33: 83 -- 100. Koopmans, T., 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287 -- 309. Manzini, P., Mariotti, M., 2008. On the representation of incomplete preferences over risky alternatives. Theory and Decision 65: 303 -- 323. McCarthy, D., Mikkola, K., 2018. Continuity and completeness of strongly independent pre- orders. Mathematical Social Sciences 93: 141 -- 145. McCarthy, D., Mikkola, K., Thomas, T., dependent preorders by sets of https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79284/ strongly in- scalar-valued functions. MPRA Paper No. 79284 2017a. Representation of McCarthy, D., Mikkola, K., Thomas, T., 2017b. Representation of strongly in- 80806. dependent https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/80806/ preorders by vector-valued functions. MPRA Paper No. McCarthy, D., Mikkola, K., Thomas, T., 2018. Utilitarianism with and without expected utility. MPRA Paper No. 90125. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/90125/ McConway, K., 1981. Marginalization and linear opinion pools. Journal of the American Statis- tical Association 76(374): 410 -- 414. Mongin, P., 1995. Consistent Bayesian aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory 66: 313 -- 351. Mongin, P., 1998. The paradox of the Bayesian experts and state-dependent utility theory. Jour- nal of Mathematical Economics 29: 331 -- 61. Mongin, P., 2001. A note on mixture sets in decision theory. Decisions in Economics and Finance 24: 59 -- 69. Mongin, P., Pivato, M., 2015. Ranking multidimensional alternatives and uncertain prospects. Journal of Economic Theory 157, 146 -- 171. Nau, R., 2006. The shape of incomplete preferences. The Annals of Statistics 34: 2430 -- 2448. Nielsen, M., 2019. On linear aggregation of infinitely many finitely additive probability measures. Theory and Decision 86: 421 -- 436. Ok, E., 2007. Real Analysis with Economic Applications, Princeton University Press. Ok, E., Ortoleva, P., Riella, G., 2012. Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: indecisiveness in beliefs vs. tastes. Econometrica 80: 1791 -- 1808. Pivato, M., 2013. Risky social choice with incomplete or noisy interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Social Choice and Welfare 40: 123 -- 139. Pivato, M., 2014. Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products. Theory and Decision 77, 31 -- 83. Ramsey, F., 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543 -- 559. Rudin, W., 1991. Functional Analysis, 2nd. edition. McGraw-Hill. Schmeidler, D., 1971. A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations. Econo- metrica 39: 403 -- 404. Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M., Kadane, J., 1995. A representation of partially ordered preferences. Annals of Statistics 23: 2168 -- 2217. Shapley, L., Baucells, M., 1998. Multiperson utility. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Department of Economics Working Paper 779. Stinchcombe, M., 2016. Objective and subjective foundations for multiple priors. Journal of Economic Theory 165: 263 -- 291. Stone, M., 1961. The opinion pool. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32, 4: 1339 -- 1342. Villegas, C., 1964. On qualitative probability σ-algebras. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35: 1787 -- 1796. Weymark, J., 1993. Harsanyi's social aggregation theorem and the weak Pareto principle. Social Choice and Welfare 10: 209 -- 221. Weymark, J., 1995. Further remarks on Harsanyi's social aggregation theorem and the weak 26 Pareto principle. Social Choice and Welfare 12: 87 -- 92. Zhou, L., 1997. Harsanyi's utilitarianism theorems: general societies. Journal of Economic Theory 72: 198 -- 207. Zuber, S., 2016. Harsanyi's theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent ag- gregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 63: 78 -- 83. 27
1907.12623	1	1907	2019-07-29T20:09:22	Closed form solutions of Lucas Uzawa model with externalities via partial Hamiltonian approach. Some Clarifications	[ "econ.TH" ]	The main aim of this paper is to give some clarifications to the recent paper published in Computational and Applied Mathematics by Naz and Chaudhry.	econ.TH	econ	Closed-form solutions of Lucas -- Uzawa model with externalities via partial Hamiltonian approach. Some Clarifications 9 1 0 2 l u J 9 2 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 3 2 6 2 1 . 7 0 9 1 : v i X r a Constantin Chilarescu Laboratoire CLERSE Universit´e de Lille, France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The main aim of this paper is to give some clarifications to the recent paper published in Computational and Applied Mathematics by Naz and Chaudhry. Keywords: Lucas -- Uzawa model with externalities; Uniqueness of solutions; Partial Hamiltonian approach. Mathematics Subject Classification: 37N 40; 49J 15; 91B62. JEL Classifications: C61, C62, O41. 1 The Model of Lucas with externality The two sectors model considered in the paper of Lucas (1988), in terms of per capita quantities, is given by the following definition. Definition 1. The set of paths {k, h, c, u} is called an optimal solution if it solves the following optimization problem: V0 = max u,c [c(t)]1−σ − 1 1 − σ e−ρtdt, ∞ Z0 (1) 1 subject to   k(t) = γ [k(t)]β [h(t)]1−β+θ [u(t)]1−β − πk(t) − c(t), h(t) = δ[1 − u(t)]h(t), k0 = k(0), h0 = h(0), (2) where k is physical capital, h is human capital, c is the real per-capita con- sumption and u is the fraction of labor allocated to the production of physical capital, with k0 > 0 and h0 > 0 being given. β is the elasticity of output with respect to physical capital, ρ is a positive discount factor, the efficiency parameters γ > 0 and δ > 0 represent the constant technological levels in the good sector and, respectively in the education sector θ is a positive exter- nality parameter and σ−1 represents the constant elasticity of intertemporal substitution, and throughout this paper we suppose that σ 6= 1 and σ 6= β. The equations (2) give the resources constraints and initial values for the state variables k and h. Of course, the two state variables and the two control variables c and u are all functions of times, but when no confusions are possible, we simply write k, h, c and u. To solve the problem (1) subject to (2), we define the Hamiltonian function: H = c1−σ − 1 1 − σ +(cid:20)γkβ(cid:16)h 1−β+θ 1−β u(cid:17)1−β − πk − c(cid:21) λ + δ(1 − u)hµ. The boundary conditions include initial values (k0, h0), and the transversality conditions: lim t→∞ e−ρtλ(t)k(t) = 0 and lim t→∞ e−ρtµ(t)h(t) = 0. Differentiating the Hamiltonian with respect to c, u, k and h, we obtain the following dynamical system that drives the economy over time. k ="γ(cid:18) h 1−β+θ 1−β u k (cid:19)1−β − π# k − c, h = δ[1 − u]h,   β − c σ + γβ c ="− ρ+π σ (cid:18) h u =h (δ+π)(1−β)+θδ λ ="ρ + π − γβ(cid:18) h µ =hρ − δ − θδ 1−β ui µ. 1−β+θ 1−β u k + δ(1−β+θ) k (cid:19)1−β# c, 1−β ui u, k (cid:19)1−β# λ 1−β u 1−β+θ (3) The alternative of the above model, obtained via Hiraguchi transform, was analyzed, first of all by Boucekkine and Ruiz-Tamarit (2008), and later by Chilarescu (2011) and both papers proved, doubtless that the model possesses a unique solution. More clarifications on the uniqueness of solutions to the model of Lucas can be found in a recent paper of Chilarescu (2018a) . The model of Lucas with externalities was studied by Hiraguchi (2009) and he proved in his paper that this model possesses a unique set of solutions. The method employed by Hiraguchi was that of hypergeometric functions. In a recent paper of Chilarescu (2018b), the same model of Lucas with ex- ternalities was completely solved, this time in a simpler manner, using only classical mathematical tools. He also provided a proof of the existence and uniqueness of solutions. In the paper we comment, Naz and Chaudhry (2018) claim that they found two different set of solutions for the model of Lucas with externalities. The first set of solutions coincides exactly with those determine by Hiraguchi and later by Chilarescu. In the second set, the solutions for the variables k and c are identical with those of the first set, that is: k(t) = k0z0 F∗ [z(t)]−1 [F∗ − F (t)] eφt, φ = (1 − β) [δ + π(1 − β)] + θδ β(1 − β) , (4) c(t) = k0z0 F∗ [z(t)]− β σ eχt, χ = (1 − β)(δ − ρ) + θδ σ(1 − β) , (5) where [h(t)] z(t) = 1−β+θ 1−β u(t) k(t) , F (t) = t Z0 z(s) σ−β σ e−ξsds, ξ = φ − χ, F∗ = F∗(u0) = lim t→∞ F (t), whereas the solutions for the variables h and u are different. In the first set the solutions they found are: u(t) = where h(t) = h0(cid:26) u0eφt [F∗ − F (t)] F∗u(t) (cid:27) 1−β 1−β+γ , ϕu0 (F∗ − F (t)) [(ϕ + δηu0) F∗ − δηu0B(t)] e−ϕt − δηu0 [F∗ − F (t)] (6) , (7) η = 1 − β + θ 1 − β , ϕ = (δ + π)(1 − β) + γδ β , B(t) = t Z0 z(s) σ−β σ e−(ξ−ϕ)sds, B∗ = B∗(u0) = lim t→∞ B(t) =(cid:18)1 + ϕ δηu0(cid:19) F∗. The corresponding solutions determined in the second set are: h(t) = h0(cid:26) u0eφt [F∗ − F (t)] F∗u(t) (cid:27) 1−β 1−β+γ , but with u(t) given by u(t) = u0 k0nzβ−1 0 [σc0 − (ρ + π − πσ) k0] + γβ(1 − σ)k0o [F∗ − F (t)] [γβ(1 − σ) − (ρ + π − πσ) zβ−1] [F∗ − F (t)] + σzβ− σ e−ξt β (8) . (9) At this point we have the following comments. 1. Because the solutions for k and c are the same in both sets of solutions, we can substitute these results into the fourth equation of the system (3), to obtain: u ="ϕ − σ−β σ e−ξt z F∗ − F (t) + δηu# u. (10) As was proved by Chilarescu (2018b), the starting value u0 can be determined and is the unique solution of the equation (ϕ + δηu0) F∗(u0) − δηu0B∗(u0) = 0. Consequently, since the function F (t, u) ="ϕ − σ−β σ e−ξt z F∗ − F (t) + δηu# u, is continuously differentiable, than via the existence and uniqueness theorem for nonlinear differential equations, there exists one and only one solution to the initial value problem u = F (t, u), u0 = u(0) and this solution is given by (7). 2. The authors only claim that their new solution for the control variable u is an admissible solution, that is u ∈ (0, 1) but they provided no proof. The proof is absolutely necessary. 3. If this solution really exists, then the authors would have provided the proof that this results is completely different from that one produced by Hiraguchi and Chilarescu. At least they would have been able to supply graphs showing that the two trajectories are totally different. None of these requirements could be found in the paper of Naz and Chaudhry. 4 In our opinion, the so-called new solution determined by Naz and Chaudhry, is nothing else, than the same solution provided by Hi- raguchi and Chilarescu, but only written in a different mathematical formulation. References [1] Boucekkine R. and Ruiz-Tamarit R., 2008. Special functions for the study of economic dynamics: The case of the Lucas-Uzawa model. Jour- nal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 33 − 54. [2] Chilarescu C., 2018a. On the Solutions of the Lucas-Uzawa Model. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis. To Appear. [3] Chilarescu C., 2018b. The effect of externality on the transitional dy- namics: the case of Lucas model. Economics Bulletin, 38, 1685 − 1702. [4] Chilarescu C., 2011. On the existence and uniqueness of solution to the Lucas-Uzawa model. Economic Modelling, 28, 109 − 117. [5] Hiraguchi R., 2009. A note on the closed-form solution to the Lu- cas -- Uzawa model with externality. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 1757 − 1760. [6] Lucas R., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3 − 42. [7] Naz R. and Chaudhry A., 2018. Closed-form solutions of Lucas -- Uzawa model with externalities via partial Hamiltonian approach. Computa- tional and Applied Mathematics. 37, 5146 − 5161.
1812.11824	1	1812	2018-12-20T22:53:01	Schr\"{o}dinger type equation for subjective identification of supply and demand	[ "econ.TH", "quant-ph" ]	The present authors have put forward a quantum game theory based model of market prices movements. By using Fisher information, we present a construction of an equation of Schr\"{o}dinger type for probability distributions for relationship between demand and supply. Various analogies between quantum physics and market phenomena can be found.	econ.TH	econ	Schrodinger type equation for subjective identification of supply and demand Marcin Makowskia, Edward W. Piotrowskia, Jan S ladkowskib aInstitute of Mathematics, University of Bia lystok K. Cio lkowskiego 1M, 15-707 Bia lystok, Poland bInstitute of Physics, The University of Silesia, 75 Pu lku Piechoty, Pl-41-500 Chorz´ow, Poland Abstract The present authors have put forward a quantum game theory based model of market prices movements. By using Fisher information, we present a con- struction of an equation of Schrodinger type for probability distributions for relationship between demand and supply. Various analogies between quantum physics and market phenomena can be found. Keywords: Fisher information, supply and demand, negative probability, market 1. Introduction A considerable part of economics is focused on various types of demand and supply curves that represent a concise account of market situation 1. They are used for forecasting in statistical analyzes of various types. Paradoxically, the shape of such curves scarcely results from a measurement-like process. We focus on the issue of determining the shape of demand and supply curves. In the Infor- mation Theory Model of Markets approach put forward in ref. [2] these curves are parameterized by the logarithm of the price of the good we are interested in (here denoted by x). From the seller's point of view, the value x is being offered 8 1 0 2 c e D 0 2 ] . H T n o c e [ 1 v 4 2 8 1 1 . 2 1 8 1 : v i X r a Email addresses: [email protected] (Marcin Makowski), [email protected] (Edward W. Piotrowski), [email protected] (Jan S ladkowski) 1M. Blaug quotes at least a hundred of such diagrams [1]. Preprint submitted to Physica A January 1, 2019 for a unit of the good she/he wants to sell -- and the agent accepts or rejects it (or vice versa)2). The agent can try to approximate the supply/demand curves for the good in question by performing an analysis of previous market activities. In such case these curves could be interpreted as probability distribution func- tions (pdf) of probabilities of accepting bids put forward by market. Therefore supply/demand curves define two random variables x -- the logarithm of buying price and y -- the logarithm of selling price. Both characteristics are subjective and often kept private because: 1. they depend on knowledge and abilities of the agent and 2. results from some observer's (not necessarily the buyer or seller) interpo- lation that involves "experimental" errors and interpretations. Re: 1) An agent that enters the game adopts a specific strategy to accom- plish her/his aims. The agent' individualities and market performance make in- dividual contribution to the market as a whole and determine effects of agent's activities. Re: 2) The supply/demand curves parameters are determined from a finite set of (often scarce) historical data by estimation in a selected a priori class of statistical distributions, or values of higher moments of statistical distributions following from averaging over the sample. We will use the second method because it does not involve arbitrariness in pre-selection of some class of pdfs. Shapes of the curves are selected by a criterion based on minimization of information measures. In our analysis, we use Fisher's information which is a function of the characteristic probability (the expectation value of the logarithmic gradient of density) [18, 23]: Z (cid:18) d dx (cid:19)2 IF = f(x) ln f(x) dx . (1) 2A word of warning: although these situations are apparently symmetric, in some contexts, they might require slightly different quantitative analysis, c.f. [3]. 2 For the convenience of notation we put f(x) = ψ2(x). Assuming that the probability density is defined by a real valued function we receive the following formula Z IF = 4 [ψ0(x)]2dx , (2) dx ψ(x). where ψ0(x) = d We consciously consider a wave function with real values only as this is suffi- cient for our purposes (description of the market price movements). Such an assumption was also used in the model of a one-dimensional linear oscillator [16] to which we refer in our work. We allow complex values of ψ(x) function. This can be useful in analyzing different (not considered in this article) effects. 2. Analogies between supply/demand curves and quantum states One of the most basic economic laws states that supply and demand are monotonic functions of prices [1]. There is an interesting probabilistic interpre- tation of the supply and demand curves [30]: Z x Z ∞ −∞ CDFs(x) = CDFd(x) = f1(p)dp (supply) , f2(p)dp (demand) , x where f1, f2 are appropriate probability density function, in general case they are different due to various properties of the market (monopoly, specific market regulations, taxes). The value of the supply function CDFs(x) is given by the probability of the purchase of a unit at the price ≤ ex (and analogously in the case of demand, for more details see [30, 28]). The agent defines its position on the market by choosing a specific sup- ply/demand curve (strategy). Despite different objects and terminology, sup- ply/demand curves and wave functions (strategies in the terminology of game theory [3]) have a lot in common. Consider the following examples. A (subjec- tive) supply curve characterizes whole market but the very agent whose strategy 3 is used to fix the curve. Analogously, electron's wave function reflects interac- tions with other objects with exclusion of this electron. Quantum states are "unknown" unless measured and measurements influence them - often in a dra- matic way. One usually supposes that markets are efficient, that is, among others, cannot be influenced by a single agent's strategy. Measurements of a market state by an agent's transactions reveal information on market supply but her/his activity should not (ex definitione) affect the market. Both, agent and, say, particles can aggregate but these groups (coalitions) should not loose their specific properties (quantum in case of particles and merchant for traders). A lot of other arguments can be stated to encourage the application of what can be called quantum decision theory to describe some aspects of market phenomena [4]-[15]. The terminology may sound sometimes strange but if one remembers that there are no underlying real quantum processes but only the underlying logical structure is addressed and interpreted. Therefore, there should be no misunderstanding. 3. The Cram´er-Rao inequality and quantum uncertainty bounds The Cram´er-Rao inequality (lower bound) says that the variance of an (un- biased) estimator is bounded below by the inverse of the Fisher information [18]. Existence of inequalities of this type can be proven in a quite general setting and one should not be surprised to find them in statistics and finance theory. Elsewhere [2], we have shown that the natural measure of transaction profit is the logarithmic rate of return x i.e. the logarithm of transaction price. One of the most important factors for market strategies is the profit uncertainty ∆x, that is risk measured by the second moment of the stochastic variable x, cf. [15]. By simple reformulation -- that results directly from Cauchy-Schwarz inequality -- the Cram´er-Rao lower bound can be rewritten in the form of the uncertainty relation [18] : ∆( ∂S ∂x ) ∆x ≥ 1 . (3) The term ∂S ∂x is usually referred to as the derivative of surprisal function 4 S(x) = − ln p(x). We call the uncertainty of this quantity the Fisher informa- tion IF . The surprisal function measures (counts) events of small probability, the so called black swans [17] but its derivative signals their appearance or dis- appearance. In the context of finance theory, we speak of buy or sell signals. The dispersion of the derivative is big in situations when theoretical expectation of black swans is unclear. In such cases market does not follow a definite trend, suffers from sudden and substantial volte-faces. On such turbulent market only cold blood and experience give chance for survival. In that sense, the Fisher information measures informative aspects of statistical distribution functions. But what is the meaning of the bound (3) for continuous models of market trans- actions? Below we would look for an answer to the following question: What are the elementary consequences for demand/supply perception under conditions of minimal market (Fisher) information? 4. Market activities minimize information The subjectiveness of the analyses suggests that market dynamics should be interpreted as market tendency to minimize the information revealed about itself. There are at least two sorts of arguments for minimizing information about markets. The first class of arguments (logical) is based on the famous Laplace principle of indifference: if we have no information on measures of probabilities of elementary events then we should treat all of them on the same footing (ie as equivalent). The second one follow from the no free lunch principle. One should not expect anything else - more information involves higher costs on the revealing information side (information is physical [21]). Consider the following variational problem for market heuristic (subjective) curves of supply (demand)3. Let f(x) be the PDF of random variables x (the logarithm of buying 3See Extreme Physical Information principle (EPI) [18]. 5 price) with the mean value m and the corresponding risk r: Z ∞ −∞ 1 = Z ∞ −∞ Z ∞ −∞ Z ∞ f(x)dx , m = x f(x)dx , r = (x − m)2 f(x)dx . (4) We are looking for a function fmin(x) =: ψ2(x) for which the IF takes the minimum value under condition (4). This problem can be solved by using Lagrangian multipliers a, b, c and searching for a minimum of the functional: F(ψ(x), ψ0(x), x) dx , (5) where −∞ F(ψ(x), ψ0(x), x) = 4[ψ0(x)]2 − (a + b x + c x2)ψ2(x). For the functional (5) the extremal4 function satisfies the Euler-Lagrange Equa- tion [19]: − ∂F ∂ψ In our case, the condition (6) takes the form: d dx = 0 . (6) (cid:19) (cid:18) ∂F ∂ψ0 ψ0 + 2 (a + b x + c x2)ψ = 0 . 8 d dx − d2ψ dx2 − 1 4(a + b x + c x2)ψ = 0 . Hence Substituting a = 8 ε µ − 4 x2 0 µ2, b = 8 x0 µ2, c = −4 µ2 , we get the following equation: − d2ψ dx2 + µ2(x − x0)2ψ = 2εµ ψ . (7) 4Because ∂2F ∂ψ02 > 0 this is the minimum (see e.g. [20]). 6 Multiplying both sides of the above equation by 1 and replacing a simple 2 µ derivative with a partial derivative (ψ is a function of one variable x) equation (7) takes the form: − 1 2µ ∂2ψ ∂x2 + µ 2 (x − x0)2 ψ = ε ψ . After translation x 7→ x + x0 − m we get: − 1 2µ ∂2ψ ∂x2 + µ 2 (x − m)2 ψ = ε ψ , (8) Let us stress that in the above derivation we assume that fmin(x) =: ψ2(x) (ψ -- real valued wave function) and we use the definition of Fisher information. No other assumptions are necessary. The procedure of minimizing the Fisher information fulfilling the conditions (4) led us to Hamiltonian in the form that we can observe in the equation (8). Remark 1. Note that Fourier transform (FT) of equation (8) lead to equation of the same type. This is a consequence of the following properties of the Fourier transform: F T−−→ y2 ψ(y) , − d2ψ(x) dx2 where ψ(y) := F T ψ(x). Remark 2. The term (x − m)2 = (x − hxi)2 of the equation (8) will be called risk operator (selling risk or supply risk) because its expectation value (see (4)) x2 ψ(x) F T−−→ − d2ψ(y) dy2 , h(x − hxi)2i = (x − m)2 ψ2(x) dx Z ∞ −∞ corresponds to the variance of a random variable x (one of the measures of risk considered in financial mathematics). The operator − ∂2 ∂x2 is associated with (x − hxi)2 by Fourier transform (see Remark 1). We see that in this way we derived an equation of the known Schrodinger type. All solutions of Eq. (8) form a discrete family of functions (see [18]): s √ 2nn!√ µ ψn(x) = − µ (x−m)2 2 e Hn(√ µ(x − m)), π 7 Figure 1: The local minima of Fisher information. where ε = εn = n + 1 2, for n = 0, 1, 2, ... . The quantum-like character of the presented theoretical model follows from the very natural requirement of minimization of information revealed by markets. When market is at "local minimum of Fisher information" one can easily prove that: • the total supply/demand risk is discrete (= n + 1 2), • the square root of PDF function for demand is the Fourier transform of the square root of PDF function for supply (see eg [3]) , • y (the logarithm of selling price) is dual to x (the logarithm of buying price) and ∆x ∆y ≥ 1, 5 • the Fisher information at its local minimum Imin ∼ εn is an invariant of Fourier transformation (supply/demand shift invariance). The Fisher information takes the minimum value εn for the strategy ψn, that is equal to the eigenvalue of the operator defining the left hand side of Eq.(8) 5The relationship between x and y is the same as for position and momentum variables in quantum mechanics. Inequality results from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. 8 that is the sum of the supply risk operator (x − hxi)2 and − ∂2 ∂x2 . It is tempting to call it the minimum information operator. Let us have a closer look at the second term. Any market adopting the minimal supply strategy ψn(x) does not reveal additional information if it shows the demand ψn(y) := F T ψn(x)6, where F T denotes the Fourier transform. This is because the quadratic form corresponding to the minimum information operator is invariant with respect to the Fourier transform. The strategy that minimizes Fisher information on market is the same from the point of view of seller and buyer in the sense that they are mutually theirs Fourier transform. In the demand representation [3], ∂x2 ) F T = (y − hyi)2. This allows for its interpre- ∂x2 takes the form F T (− ∂2 − ∂2 tation as the demand risk operator and we have a connection between risk and information associated with strategy: minimal information content of a market supply/demand strategy is equal to the sum of the related supply and demand risk (actually this is a sum of two noncommuting operators!). Therefore, it is natural to assume that (8) is sort of a general risk balance equation. In general, the set of all market strategies contain a countable subset of local minimum strategies. Recalling the well known facts concerning quantum harmonic oscillator, we can claim that any strategy (actually its probability amplitude) can be approximated with arbitrary precision by a dense subset of amplitudes that minimize probability. Therefore, in principle, we can ex- press any market strategy amplitude as a linear combination of amplitudes that minimize information about the market -- and the squared absolute values of the coefficients give probabilities that the results of the basic strategies would correspond to situations that the market adopts one of these locally minimal strategies. We should remember that a linear combination of two strategies is from the information point of view simpler than the corresponding mixed strategy (convex combination) and for mixed strategy we should also take the Boltzmann- Shannon entropy for the weights (coefficients) into consideration. Note that 6This is the assumption of our model, see [31]. 9 the invariance of our approach with respect to the supply-demand behavior is necessary because when you buy you exchange money for o goods and when you sell you actually exchange goods for money (and money is simple a preselected good). 5. The Wigner functions of market The above results can be presented in an elegant way with the help of the formalism of Wigner functions defined on the common domain of variables x and y (the phase space): fn(x, y) = 1 2π 2) cos(s y)ds . 2) ψn(x − s Z ∞ ψn(x + s −∞ Conditional (fixed public price for buying or selling) demand and supply curves are depicted by the graphs of the following CDFs: Z ln c Z ln 1 −∞ c −∞ CDFd(ln c) = CDFs(ln c) = fn(x = const., y)dy , fn(x, y = const.)dx , where c denotes the price of the good in question. Unfortunately, only for n=0 (ε= 1 2) the Wigner function is positive-definite (the surface of gaussian shape). The preimage of R− under fn, n > 0, is the sum of b n 2c concentric circles for even n and only a single circle for odd n, see Fig. 2. This is the area where Giffen paradoxes appear7. Therefore, minimizing information market strategies besides being gaussian in addition involve bluffing! Violation of laws of supply and demand result from economy (costs reduction) in information transfer. In this case CDFs and CDFd is not monotonic. This is a consequence of the fact that fn is negative on some interval (see [28]). One might by alerted by the appearance of negative probabilities [25, 26, 27] but they are well-defined theoretical concepts, like a negative of money. An interesting model for the 7That is the effect of turning back of the supply and demand curves what often happens for work supplies and, in general, for the so called the Giffen goods [22, 24]. 10 Figure 2: Examples minimal information demand/supply surfaces with negative probabilities. 11 study of the negative probability on markets where there are anomalies in the law of supply and demand are presented in [28]. 6. Conclusion Why quantum-like description of market make sense? The Fisher informa- tion might provide us with the key answer. For every achievable profit and risk, market adopts the very special strategy ψn that discloses only minimal amount of information. The appropriate total risk =IF is "quantized" (i.e. takes values from a discrete set) and only for its minimal value ε= 1 2 is compatible with "mar- ket laws" such as monotonic supply and demand. The respective time evolution of market can be modelled by mixed strategies [3, 29]. In this case, information loss is measured on the meta-level by Boltzmann/Shannon entropy [30]. The resulting quantum-like strategies imply interesting agents' behaviors [31]. It is worth emphasizing here that quantum theory imposes desirable properties on player strategies that also characterize liquid goods in the market. Quantum strategies can be identified in a non-destructive way (quantum fingerprinting). They also can not be cloned (no-cloning theorem) and its is impossible to delete one of the copies (no-deleting theorem). There are also many other interesting possibilities of using quantum entanglement, cryptography. For these reasons, it is possible that the quantum market will finally came into existence. In this paper, we showed that in such a market only the least risky buying / selling strategies meet the classic laws of supply and demand. It should be noted that the quantum market model derived from minimal Fisher information can have many inconsistencies with the quantum model of small vibrations of physical systems, giving rise to conclusions on the nature of fundamental phenomena in material systems. These inconsistencies pertain to conclusions referring to market phenomena. For instance, total risk (equivalent of the energy of the material system) does not have to be reduced in market situations involving reasonable players ready to take risks in order to increase transaction profit or in order to deliberately disrupt the market by disinforma- 12 tion caused by using non-monotonic demand/supply strategies (there have been situations where such behaviour was economically justified). Also, the world of trading tactics, whether referring to market agents, humans or automatic sys- tems, should account for factors such as altruism, political market interventions, non-economic benefits, etc. Considering all these factors in a mathematical model is very difficult and continues to be a challenge to researchers. References [1] M. Blaug, Economic Theory in retrospect (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1985). [2] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Physica A 382, 228 (2007). [3] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Physica A, 312, 208 (2002). [4] W. Segal, I. E. Segal, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4072 (1998). [5] E. Haven, Physica A 304, 507 (2002). [6] E. Haven, Physica A 344, 142 (2004). [7] B. E. Baaquie, Quantum Finance: Path Integrals and Hamiltonians for Op- tions and Interest Rates, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007). [8] A. Yu. Khrennikov, Quantum-like Probabilistic Models outside Physics, in: I. Licata and A. Sakaji (Eds.), Physics of Emergence and Organization (World Scientific, New Jersey 2008). [9] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Int. J. Quant. Information 1, 395 (2003). [10] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Quantitative Finance 4, 61 (2004). [11] O. Choustova, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 70, 0120062007 (2007). [12] D. Aerts, M. Czachor, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, L123 (2004). [13] V. I. Yukalov, D. Sornette, Advs. Complex Syst. 13, 659 (2010). [physics.soc-ph]. 13 [14] A. A. Grib, G. N. Parfionov; Contrib. to Game Theory and Manage 2, 137 (2009). [15] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Acta Phys. Pol. B32, 3873 (2001). [16] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics Non-Relativistic Theory 2nd Edition, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxfort 1965). [17] N. N. Taleb The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Ran- dom House, New York 2007). [18] B. R. Frieden, Science from Fisher Information: A Unification (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004). [19] V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, (Springer, New York, 1989). [20] M. Moriconi, AM J PHYS 85, 633 (2017). [21] C. H. Bennett, R. Landauer, Sci. Am. 255, 48 (1985). [22] G. J. Stigler, J. Polit. Economy 55, 152 (1947). [23] B. J. Falaye, F. A. Serrano, S. H. Dong, Phys. Lett. A 380, 267 (2016) [24] J. S ladkowski, Physica A 324, 234 (2003). [25] P. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 180, 1 (1942). [26] R. P. Feynman, Negative Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics, in: B. J. Hi- ley and F. D. Peat (Eds.), Quantum Implications, Essays in Honour of D. Bohm (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1987). [27] E. G. Haug, Derivatives Models on Models, (John Wiley & Sons, New York 2007). [28] M. Makowski, E. W. Piotrowski, J. Syska, J. S ladkowski, Physica A 473, 53 (2017). 14 [29] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, Physica A 345, 185 (2005). [30] E. W. Piotrowski, J. S ladkowski, J. Stat. Mech. P03035 (2009). [31] E. W. Piotrowski, J. Syska, J. S ladkowski, Physica A 318, 516 (2003). 15
1910.12131	1	1910	2019-10-26T20:26:01	Almost Quasi-linear Utilities in Disguise: Positive-representation An Extension of Roberts' Theorem	[ "econ.TH", "cs.GT" ]	This work deals with the implementation of social choice rules using dominant strategies for unrestricted preferences. The seminal Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem shows that only few unappealing social choice rules can be implemented unless we assume some restrictions on the preferences or allow monetary transfers. When monetary transfers are allowed and quasi-linear utilities w.r.t. money are assumed, Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms were shown to implement any affine-maximizer, and by the work of Roberts, only affine-maximizers can be implemented whenever the type sets of the agents are rich enough. In this work, we generalize these results and define a new class of preferences: Preferences which are positive-represented by a quasi-linear utility. That is, agents whose preference on a subspace of the outcomes can be modeled using a quasi-linear utility. We show that the characterization of VCG mechanisms as the incentive-compatible mechanisms extends naturally to this domain. Our result follows from a simple reduction to the characterization of VCG mechanisms. Hence, we see our result more as a fuller more correct version of the VCG characterization. This work also highlights a common misconception in the community attributing the VCG result to the usage of transferable utility. Our result shows that the incentive-compatibility of the VCG mechanisms does not rely on money being a common denominator, but rather on the ability of the designer to fine the agents on a continuous (maybe agent-specific) scale. We think these two insights, considering the utility as a representation and not as the preference itself (which is common in the economic community) and considering utilities which represent the preference only for the relevant domain, would turn out to fruitful in other domains as well.	econ.TH	econ	Almost Quasi-linear Utilities in Disguise: Positive-representation An Extension of Roberts' Theorem Ilan Nehama Bar-Ilan University [email protected] Abstract. This work deals with the implementation of social choice rules using dominant strategies for unrestricted preferences. The seminal Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem shows that only few unappealing social choice rules can be implemented unless we assume some restrictions on the preferences or allow monetary transfers. When monetary transfers are allowed and quasi-linear utilities w.r.t. money are assumed, Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms were shown to implement any affine-maximizer, and by the work of Roberts, only affine-maximizers can be implemented whenever the type sets of the agents are rich enough. In this work, we generalize these results and define a new class of preferences: Preferences which are positive-represented by a quasi-linear utility. That is, agents whose preference on a subspace of the outcomes, which is defined by a threshold, can be modeled using a quasi-linear utility. We show that the characterization of VCG mechanisms as the incentive-compatible mechanisms extends naturally to this domain. We show that the original characterization of VCG mechanism is an immediate corollary of our generalized characterization. Our result follows from a simple reduction to the characterization of VCG mechanisms. Hence, we see our result more as a fuller more correct version of the VCG characterization than a new non-quasi-linear domain extension. This work also highlights a common misconception in the community attributing the VCG result to the usage of transferable utility. Our result shows that these results extend naturally to the non- transferable utility domain. That is, that the incentive-compatibility of the VCG mechanisms does not rely on money being a common denominator, but rather on the ability of the designer to fine the agents on a continuous (maybe agent-specific) scale. We also provide simple characterizations of the types which are represented and pos-represented by quasi-linear utility functions. We show characterizations both in utility function terms and in preference terms, by that supplying a full comparison of the different classes. We think these two insights, considering the utility as a representation and not as the preference itself (which is common in the economic community) and considering utilities which represent the preference only for the relevant domain, would turn out to fruitful in other domains as well. Keywords: Mechanism Design Strategy-proofness Dominant Strategy Incentive Compatibility Non Quasi-linear Utilities Positive-representation Roberts' Theorem 1 Introduction Consider the problem of a designer who wishes to implement a given social choice rule. That is, consider a finite set of agents N and a finite set of possible social alternatives A s.t. each agent holds a preference (a total order) over A; The designer needs to choose, as a function of the agents' preferences, one social alternative out of A, e.g., one that maximizes a social welfare or some other criterion, but the preferences are a-priori unknown to the designer. A naıve procedure for the designer would be to first query the preferences of the We would like to thank Reshef Meir and Hongyao Ma for stimulating early discussions on the topic. We also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed reviews, which helped us to improve the presentation of this work. This work was supported in part by Israel Science Foundation (ISF) Grant 1626/18. An extended abstract of this work is forthcoming in: The 15th Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2019). agents and choose the alternative accordingly. The problem with such solution is that an agent might report her preference untruthfully if she thinks it might result in a better alternative for her, by that preventing the designer from choosing correctly. In this work, we study the fundamental question of which social choice rules are implementable by a principal, using the most basic implementation concept of dominant-strategies. That is, we aim to character- ize which social choice rules can be implemented s.t. no agent has an incentive to misreport her preference, independent of the reports of the other agents, and to show a mechanism for any such implementable social choice rule. Furthermore, we analyze implementation using deterministic incentive-compatible direct reve- lation mechanisms. In a direct revelation mechanism each agent is asked to report her true preference and subsequently a decision is made according to a decision rule. Incentive-compatibility for these mechanism means that an agent cannot benefit from reporting a preference different from her true preference. In the sequel, we assume the mechanisms are direct and deterministic and in Section 4 we discuss these restrictions and how to relax them. In particular, note that the assumption of the mechanism being direct is without loss of the generality, as according to the revelation principle [11] any implementable social choice rule is imple- mentable using a direct revelation mechanism and the characterization of direct revelation implementations is easily lifted to the general characterization. The seminal works of Gibbard [3] and Satterthwaite [14] show that without further assumptions, if all profiles of preferences are feasible, one cannot devise a mechanism for choosing a single alternative, besides trivial procedures which a-priori ignore most agents or most alternatives. Assuming the preferences of the agents are richer and include intensity of preferences (that is, a cardinal utility function u : A → ℜ which assigns for every alternative its utility or desirability for the agent) does not circumvent this impossibility. On the other hand, the seminal works of Vickrey [15], Clarke [2], and Groves [5] show that allowing the designer to induce monetary transfers (pay money to the agents or charge them) gives rise to a non-trivial family of implementable social choice rules, while still assuming that all profile preferences are feasible. That is, the outcome is both a chosen alternative and in addition a sequence of payments of the agents (which might be negative, i.e., payment to the agents). In addition, the preferences of the agents is extended to preferences over A × ℜ, the tuples of an alternative and a payment of the agent. Note that (under some mild conditions) such preference also defines a monetary value for each alternative and hence defines a cardinal utility v : A → ℜ over the alternatives. When all agents' preferences are defined by quasi-linear utility functions u : A × ℜ → ℜ of the form u (a, z) = v (a) − z for some v : A → ℜ, the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms are incentive- compatible direct mechanisms which can implement any affine-maximizer of the agents' valuation func- tions v [15, 2, 5]. Moreover, Green and Laffont [4] and Roberts [13] later showed that these are the only incentive-compatible onto mechanisms when all profiles of quasi-linear utility functions are feasible. However, quasi-linearity is a strong assumption. On the individual level, it is an assumption that in particular there is no income effect in the evaluations of the alternatives, which might be violated due to, for example, lack of liquidity, wealth effect, or risk-aversion. On the society level, it is an assumption of a transferable utility model, that is, an assumption that the 'utility loss' due to paying $1 for Agent i equals to the 'utility gain' due to receiving this amount for Agent j. Hence, it is of interest to search of other preference domains for which non-trivial implementable social choice rules exist, while still inducing the full unrestricted set of preferences over the alternatives. To the best of our knowledge, except the aforementioned works for quasi-linear utilities, very few papers considered social choice mechanisms with monetary transfers without restricting the possible profiles of preferences over the alternatives (In much more restricted domains, like single-peaked facility location [9] or auctions, just to name two, there are many truthful mechanisms that are not affine-maximizers.). The work most relevant to this paper is the result by Ma et al. [7]. In this work, Ma et al. present a new family of utility functions, the parallel utility functions, which is a super-set of the family of the quasi-linear utility functions. Following the works of Vickrey, Clarke, and Groves and the work of Roberts, they present a family of mechanisms which are incentive-compatible whenever all agents have parallel utility functions, and prove that the induced social choice rules are the only implementable rules (under two additional mild conditions, No subsidy & Individual rationality) if all induced valuation profiles are feasible. 2 Our Results We think that parallel utility functions can be seen as a special case of disguised almost quasi-linear utility functions, by that strengthening the knife-edginess of the quasi-linear scenario and the characterization of VCG mechanisms. We formalize this by two insights (which catches this intuitive notion of 'disguised almost quasi-linear'). We discuss this connection we see in more details in Section 4. First, we notice that VCG mechanisms do not depend on the quasi-linear representation an agent reports and can be stated (while still maintaining the characterization result) as mechanisms that get as input the preferences of the agents and not utility functions. In particular, VCG mechanisms can be extended to receive non-quasi-linear utility functions as long as there is some quasi-linear representation of it (quasi- linear in disguise). While this observation is technically trivial, we think it is conceptually important as being consistent with the revealed preferences principle and in particular with the fact that one cannot test whether an agent holds one utility representationor the other, so in general there is no base to assume that one utility function better represents the agent. Second, our main insight is a weaker notion of representation, positive-representation (and shortly pos- representation). We say an agent's preference is pos-represented by a utility function if they coincide whenever the utility of at least one of the two comparands is positive (and not for any two comparands as with regular representation by a utility function). This new simple notion allows us to extend the previous above works of Vickrey, Clarke, Groves, Green-Laffont, Roberts. We extend the VCG mechanisms to mechanisms that get as input preferences which are pos-represented by quasi-linear functions. We show that these mechanisms are incentive compatible (Theorem 1) and show that when all induced valuation profiles are feasible, essentially these are the only incentive-compatible onto mechanisms (Theorem 2). This result extends the characterizations of Roberts [13] and Green-Laffont [4]. We argue that preferences which are pos-represented by quasi-linear utility functions maintain the es- sential properties of quasi-linear utility functions (hence we call them 'disguised almost quasi-linear utility functions') and we see the simple proofs by reduction as a supporting evidence for that. This strengthens the knife-edginess of the VCG phenomenon by showing that the quasi-linear domain is essentially the only unrestricted preference domain for which an incentive-compatible non-trivial implementation is known, and we hope this gives a better research direction of exploring mechanism design beyond quasi-linear preferences. Furthermore, we think that our work addresses a common misconception in the community of the reason why introducing money enables the design of general mechanisms and circumventing impossibility results `a la Gibbard-Satterthwaite. Many works attribute the VCG result to the extended model being a transferable utility model. For example, in the Algorithmic Game Theory book [12], we found that VCG Mechanisms (and the driving force behind their incentive compatibility) are introduced using phrases like "Money can be transferred between players. ... (This) will allow us to do things that we could not do otherwise." Our work shows that the main driving-force is the individual additive-separability and that the introduction of transferable utility does not play a role in the characterization. For instance, the principal might use different incomparable payment methods for different agents. We discuss the connection to the stronger assumption of quasi-linearity and transferable utility in more details in Section 4. Identifying the preference of an agent with her cardinal utility is basic in the theory of modeling eco- nomic agents, and in most scenarios, unless additional strong assumptions are added, the utility is only a representation of the preference and does not hold any additional information of the decision behavior of the agent. Moreover, in many cases, one's assumptions on the agents' preferences are mostly irrelevant when considering outcomes below some threshold or an outside option. Hence, we think these two insights could be fruitful in other domains as well. To ease the reading flow, some of the less significant proofs are postponed to the appendix. 2 Model We denote the set of agents by N , the set of alternatives by A, and their respective size by n = N and m = A. Each agent holds a preference, i.e. an order, over A × ℜ, the set of tuples of an alternative and 3 a payment of the agent. We also refer to the preference as the agent's type. We say a cardinal function u : A × ℜ → ℜ represents [8, Def. 1.B.2] a preference < (and refer to u as the utility function) if for any two alternatives a, b ∈ A and two payments za, zb ∈ ℜ, ha, zai < hb, zbi ⇐⇒ u (a, za) > u (b, zb) . It is not hard to see that two utility functions u, w : A × ℜ → ℜ represent the same preference iff one is a monotone transformation of the other, that is, there exists a monotone bijection ϕ : ℜ → ℜ s.t. u = ϕ ◦ w. In this work, we assume that the preferences of the agents can be represented by a utility function u s.t. u is strictly decreasing in the payment, i.e., an agent prefers to pay less. We denote the set of all utility functions which are strictly decreasing in the payment by U and the set of preferences (types) represented by utility functions from U by T . We use the notations of types and type sets in our results to emphasize that our results are invariant to the choice of representations. In places it is not important, in order to ease the readability, we sometimes use utility functions to characterize directly the agents. A special family of utility functions are the quasi-linear utility functions.1 These are the utility functions of the form u (a, z) = v (a) − z for some function v : A → ℜ which is referred to as the valuation. We denote the set of all quasi-linear utility functions by U QL. We note that the quasi-linear representations of a preference are closed to shifts by a constant and in particular a preference can be represented by a continuum of quasi-linear utility functions. Claim 1. Let u, w : A × ℜ → ℜ be two quasi-linear utility functions. Then the following three statements are equivalent: 1. Both u and w represent the same preference over A × ℜ. 2. There exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. for any alternative a ∈ A 3. There exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. for any alternative a ∈ A and z ∈ ℜ u (a, z) = w (a, z) + C. u (a, 0) = w (a, 0) + C. In a recent work, Ma el al. defined a new class of utility function extending the quasi-linear family, which they named Parallel utility functions. Definition 1 (Parallel utility functions [7]). A utility function u : A × ℜ → ℜ is a parallel utility function if • u (a, z) is continuous and strictly decreasing in z, • For any alternative a ∈ A, limz→∞ u (a, z) < mina′∈A u (a′, 0), i.e., an agent prefers her worst alternative for free over paying a large enough payment for a, and • For any two alternatives a, b ∈ A s.t. u (a, 0) > u (b, 0) and any payment z > 0 s.t. u (b, z) > mina′∈A u (a′, 0) (i.e., any positive payment z s.t. the agent prefers paying z for b over receiving some alternative for free) for pa being the payment z s.t. u (a, z) = mina′∈A u (a′, 0), i.e., pa is the maximal payment s.t. the agent prefers paying it for a over receiving for free her worst alternative, and pb is defined similarly. u(cid:0)a, z +(cid:0)pa − pb(cid:1)(cid:1) = u (b, z) , Example i. Let u ∈ U QL be a quasi linear utility function, i.e., u (a, z) = v (a) − z for some valuation function v : A → ℜ. Then, for any two alternatives a, b ∈ A, pa = v (a) − mina′∈A v (a′) and u(cid:0)a, z +(cid:0)pa − pb(cid:1)(cid:1) = v (a) − [z + (v (a) − v (b))] = v (b) − z = u (b, z) , i.e., u is a parallel utility function. Example ii. Generalizing the former, let u ∈ U QL be a quasi-linear utility function and consider a utility function u′ ∈ U which coincides with u whenever u (a, z) > mina′∈A u (a′, 0) (but still u′ is continuous and downward monotone in the payment). For any two alternatives a, b ∈ A s.t. u′ (a, 0) > u′ (b, 0) and any payment z > 0 s.t. u′ (b, z) > mina′∈A u′ (a′, 0), it holds that • u (a, 0) = u′ (a, 0) > u′ (b, 0) = u (b, 0), • pa = u (a, 0) − mina′∈A u (a′, 0) and similarly for b. So pa > pb, and hence u′ (b, z) = u (b, z) = u(cid:0)a, z +(cid:0)pa − pb(cid:1)(cid:1) = u′(cid:0)a, z +(cid:0)pa − pb(cid:1)(cid:1) , i.e., u is a parallel utility function. 1 In the economics literature (e.g., [4]) these functions are also referred to as separable or additively separable. 4 Example iii. On the other hand, consider the following utility function. u (a, z) =(z 6 −3 −3 − z z > −3 −1 − z/3 ; u (b, z) = −2 − z ; u (c, z) =(z 6 −1 −1 − z z > −1 −3 − 3z. Then, u coincides with the quasi-linear utility function  uQL (a, z) = −3 − z uQL (b, z) = −2 − z uQL (c, z) = −1 − z whenever uQL (x, z) > 0 = 3 + mina′∈A uQL (a′, 0) but it is not a parallel utility function. One could see that by noticing that pa = 6, pb = 1, and pc = 0, but for z = 0: u(cid:0)a, z +(cid:0)pa − pb(cid:1)(cid:1) = u (a, 5) = −8/3 u (b, z) = u (b, 0) = −2. Given type domains T1, . . . , Tn ⊆ T for the agents, a direct mechanism with monetary transfers (or shortly a mechanism) for ×i∈N Ti is defined by two functions x : ×i∈N Ti → A and p : ×i∈N Ti → ℜN (and we notate by pi the ith coordinate of p) in the following way: At the first stage each agent reports her type, and based on the reports t1, . . . , tn, the alternative x (t1, . . . , tn) is chosen and Agent i pays pi (t1, . . . , tn). We say that a mechanism hx, pi is onto if the function x is onto, i.e., any alternative is the outcome of some report vector.2 We use the notation T−i for ×j6=iTj, and say that a mechanism hx, pi is incentive compatible if it is in an agent best interest to always report truthfully her type. Formally, for any type ti ∈ Ti and any sequence of reports t−i ∈ T−i, ti ∈ argmax i∈Ti t′ hx (t′ i, t−i) , pi (t′ i, t−i)i , where the maximum is taken according to the preference ti. An interesting class of incentive-compatible mechanisms are the affine VCG mechanisms which get as reports utility functions and not general preferences. Definition 2 (Affine VCG mechanism). We say that a mechanism hx, pi is an affine VCG mechanism if there exist an agent weight vector w ∈ ∆ (N ) (i.e., w ∈ [0, 1]N andPi∈N wi = 1), an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA, and a non-empty set of alternatives A′ ⊆ A s.t. for any report vector (u1, . . . , un) ∈ ×i∈N Ui, and there exist functions hi : U−i → ℜ for i = 1, . . . , n s.t. for any report vector (u1, . . . , un) the payment of Agent i is x (u1, . . . , un) ∈ argmax wi · ui (a, 0)! a∈A′ ca +Xi∈N wj · uj (a⋆, 0) + ca⋆ for a⋆ = x (ui, u−i) pi (ui, u−i) = hi (u−i) − 1/wi ·Xj6=i if wi > 0 and pi (ui, u−i) = hi (u−i) if wi = 0 (i.e., if Agent i has no influence of the chosen alternative x (ui, u−i)). In their works, Vickrey [15], Clarke [2], and Groves [5] proved that when for all agents Ui ⊆ U QL, i.e., all agents hold quasi-linear utility functions, these mechanisms are incentive-compatible. In particular, an agent is indifferent between reporting different representations of her type. Furthermore, recalling that two (quasi-linear) utility functions represent the same preference iff they differ by a constant, we note that x and pi are actually invariant to the representation an Agent i reports. Later, Green and Laffont [4] and Roberts [13] proved that if for all agents Ui = U QL, these are the only direct onto incentive-compatible mechanisms. 2 In the social choice and economics literature [1, 10], this property is also referred to as Citizen sovereignty and as Non-imposition. 5 Theorem (Roberts [13, Thm. 3.1] & Green and Laffont [4, Thm. 3]). Let hx, pi be an onto incentive-compatible mechanism for the case(cid:2)∀i Ui = U QL(cid:3). Then, it is an affine VCG mechanism. 3 Main Result In this work, we introduce a weaker notion of representation we call positive-representation. Definition 3 (Positive-representation). We say a utility function u : A×ℜ → ℜ pos-represents a preference < if for any two alternatives a, b ∈ A and payments za, zb ∈ ℜ s.t. either u (a, za) > 0 or u (b, zb) > 0, ha, zai < hb, zbi ⇐⇒ u (a, za) > u (b, zb) . That is, we require u to represent the preference only above some threshold (The choice of zero as the threshold is for normalization). E.g., in Example iii we saw a preference which coincides with a quasi-linear utility function uQL whenever the utility is positive (but the threshold was not mina∈A uQL (a, 0) and the utility was not a parallel utility). One could think of this threshold as representing an outside option so we are not interested in modeling the agent's preferences between two unacceptable alternatives. This allows one to represent the agent using a simpler utility function (quasi-linear in our case). For example, a common practice is to model a buyer in a combinatorial auction using a valuation function v : 2X → ℜ which assigns a monetary value to each subset of items, and a quasi-linear utility function u (S, z) = v (S) − z for S ⊆ X and z ∈ ℜ. In particular, such representation entails a preference between two outcomes in which the buyer over-paid for the bundle she received. But in most cases, it is assumed a buyer can always refuse to over-pay, and it might be a better modeling to assume indifference. Moreover, commonly this preference pays no role in the analysis, so the analysis should be applicable also if the buyer has a different preference between such outcomes. In this work we are interested in agents that can be pos-represented by quasi-linear utility functions, and show that the characterization of incentive-compatible mechanisms is naturally extended for these prefer- ences. It is straight-forward from the definition that if a utility function u represents a preference then in particular u pos-represents the preference. Moreover, as a corollary of Claim 1 we get the following. Corollary 1. Let u ∈ U QL be a quasi-linear utility function and < a preference s.t. u represents <. Then, for any constant C ∈ ℜ the utility function u + C pos-represents <. Note that only a weaker version of Claim 1 holds for pos-representations. One can find two quasi-linear utility functions u, v ∈ U QL which differ by a constant but u pos-represents a preference which v does not. For instance, take A = {a, b, c} and the preference which is defined by the following utility function w : A × ℜ → ℜ: w (a, z) = 1 − z ; w (b, z) =(z 6 2 2 − z z > 2 4 − 2z ; w (c, z) =(z 6 3 z > 3 3 − z 9 − 3z. 6 0 1 2 3 z w (a, z) w (b, z) w (c, z) Then, this preference is pos-represented by the quasi-linear utility function . For instance u′ (a, 6) = 1 u′ (b, 6) = 2 u′ (c, 6) = 3 w (a, 6) = −5 w (b, 6) = −8 w (c, 6) = −9 . but u′ (a, z) = 7 − z u′ (b, z) = 8 − z u′ (c, z) = 9 − z  u (a, z) = 1 − z u (b, z) = 2 − z u (c, z) = 3 − z but not by Claim 2. Let u, w : A × ℜ → ℜ be two quasi-linear utility functions. 1. If both u and w pos-represent the same preference, then there exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ w (a, z) = u (a, z) + C. 2. If there exists a positive constant C > 0 s.t. then w pos-represents any preference which is pos-represented by u. ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ w (a, z) = u (a, z) − C, The mechanism Given a non-empty set of alternatives A′ ⊆ A, an agent weight vector w ∈ ∆ (N ), and an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA, we define the following mechanism for the scenario that for all i ∈ N , any type of Agent i, t ∈ Ti, is pos-represented by (at least one) quasi-linear utility function u ∈ U QL. Mechanism 1. Given a vector of reports (t1, . . . , tn) for ti ∈ Ti, ◮ Define ui to be an arbitrary quasi-linear utility function which pos-represents ti. • The chosen alternative: x (t1, . . . , tn) = a⋆. • The payment of Agent i: If wi > 0, ◮ Choose a⋆ ∈ argmaxa∈A′(cid:0)ca +Pi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)(cid:1) and return pi (t1, . . . , tn) = hi (t−i) − 1/wi ·ca⋆ +Xj6=i wj · uj (a⋆, 0) , for some function hi which depends only on the reports of the other agents, and in case wi = 0, pi (t1, . . . , tn) = hi (t−i). There is no constraint on the choice of the pos-representations ui in the first step of the mechanism. Nev- ertheless, we note that, similarly to our note for the VCG mechanism, the choice of pos-representation for Agent i does not influence the chosen alternative x or her payment pi. Based on Claim 2, the set argmaxa∈A′(cid:0)ca +Pi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)(cid:1) does not depend on the chosen pos-representations, and the payment of 7 Agent i is influenced only by the choice of pos-representations for other agents. Hence, one can derive a mech- anism with a more natural input language which gets (a compact representation of) some pos-representation of the agent's preference. We show that Mechanism 1 is incentive-compatible under an additional bound on the payment functions hi. Theorem 1. Let ∅ 6= A′ ⊆ A, w ∈ ∆ (N ) be an agent weight vector, c ∈ ℜA an alternative cost vector, and hx, pi Mechanism 1 defined by hA′, w, ci. Then hx, pi is an incentive-compatible mechanism whenever the following hold: -- For all i ∈ N , any type of Agent i is pos-represented by a quasi-linear utility function u ∈ U QL. -- For all i ∈ N , the function h−i in the definition of Mechanism 1 satisfies that for any profile of types t1 ∈ T1, . . . , tn ∈ Tn, there exist quasi-linear utility functions u1, . . . , un ∈ U QL s.t. ui pos-represents ti and hi (t−i) 6 1/wi · max a∈A′ca +Xj wj · uj (a, 0) . ui (a, 0) − hi (t−i) + 1/wi ·ca +Xj6=i wj · uj (a, 0) , and this expression is maximized when ca +Xj wj · uj (a, 0) is maximized which is what happens when Agent i reports truthfully. 3 Our proof follows the steps of the incentive-compatibility proof of the VCG mechanism of Nisan [12, Prop. 9.31] with few modifications. 8 Before proving the theorem, it is worthwhile to understand the bound on hi for the following two scenarios: If all types of all agents are represented by some quasi-linear utility function, then for any function hi we can find pos-representations of the types s.t. the bound will hold (since for any constant C > 0 (u + C) represents, and hence also pos-represents, the same preference as u). If all types of all agents are pos-represented by some quasi-linear utility function ui ∈ U QL which satisfies mina∈A′ ui (a, 0) > 0, then the Clarke pivot rule [12, Def. 9.19] hi (t−i) = 1/wi · max a∈A′ca +Xj6=i wj · uj (a, 0) and uα (x, z) =(z 6 v (x) − α v (x) − α − z O/W (v (x) − α − z)3 , satisfies this bound. Last, we note that such function might not exist when the type sets are too rich. E.g., when ca ≡ 0, wi ≡ 1, and Ti = {uα}α∈ℜ for v (x) = x = a 1 2 x = b x = c 3 uα (for large enough α) is pos-represented only by quasi-linear utility functions satisfying uQL (x, 0) 6 −α for all alternatives x ∈ A, so the bound is not feasible, Proof of Theorem 1.3 We will show that Agent i maximizes her preference by reporting truthfully. First, we notice that if wi = 0 this claim is trivial since the agent has no influence on the chosen alternative or on her payment. Henceforth, we assume that wi > 0. Let ti ∈ Ti be the preference of Agent i, and let t−i ∈ ×j6=iTj be the reports of the other agents. Next, for j = 1, . . . , n, let uj be the quasi-linear pos-representation of tj which was chosen by the mechanism. First, we show that Agent i maximizes the utility ui by reporting truthfully. If an alternative a is chosen, the utility is Based on Claim 2, the set of maximizers, argmaxa∈A′(cid:16)ca +Pj∈N wj · uj (a, 0)(cid:17), is invariant to the choice of pos-representations of the agents' preferences. By the assumption on h−i, there exist pos-representations u1, . . . , un ∈ U QL of the agents preferences s.t. ui (x (t1, . . . , tn) , pi (t1, . . . , tn)) = 1/wi ·cx(t1,...,tn) +Xj so maximizing ui also maximizes the preference of Agent i. wj · uj (a⋆, 0) − hi (t−i) > 0, ⊓⊔ Next, we show that when the type sets Ti are rich enough, there is no other onto incentive-compatible mechanisms. Theorem 2. If there are at least three alternatives (A > 3) and for any i ∈ N there exist a bijection ϕi between Ti and (cid:8)u ∈ U QL(cid:12)(cid:12) mina∈A u (a, 0) = 0(cid:9) s.t. for any type t ∈ Ti, t is pos-represented by ϕi (t), then any incentive-compatible onto mechanism hx, pi s.t. for any profile of types t1 ∈ T1, . . . , tn ∈ Tn, the payment of the ith agent satisfies pi (t1, . . . , Tn) 6 [ϕi (t)] (x (t1, . . . , tn) , 0) , can be defined as Mechanism 1 w.r.t. A′ = A, an agent weight vector w ∈ ∆ (N ), and an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA. Following the steps of Roberts [13, Thm. 3.2], we get as a corollary that without monetary transfers the only incentive-compatible mechanisms are dictatorships. Corollary 2. If there are at least three alternatives and the type sets {Ti}i∈N satisfy the conditions of Thm. 2, then for any incentive-compatible onto mechanism hx, pi without transfers (i.e., pi (t1, . . . , tn) ≡ 0 for all i ∈ N ), there exists a unique agent d ∈ N (a dictator) s.t. for any type profile (t1, . . . , tn) x (t1, . . . , tn) ∈ argmax a∈A ud (a, 0) . Proof of Theorem 2. Let hx, pi be an incentive-compatible onto mechanism as stated in the theorem. We define the following auxiliary mechanism for the case in which the type sets of all agents are U QL, i.e., all quasi-linear utility functions. (Since ϕi is a bijection we use the notation ϕi for ϕi −1 as well) Mechanism. Given a vector of reports (u1, . . . , un) ∈(cid:0)U QL(cid:1)N ◮ For i = 1, . . . , n , • Define eui ∈ U QL by eui (a, 0) = ui (a, 0) − mina′∈A ui (a′, 0). • Define ti ∈ Ti to be ϕi (eu) ∈ Ti. ◮ Apply the mechanism hx, pi on the type vector (t1, . . . , tn) and return the same. Then the following two properties hold: -- The mechanism is onto. Let a ∈ A. Since hx, pi is an onto mechanism, there exists a type profile (t1 ∈ T1, . . . , tn ∈ Tn) which is mapped by the mechanism hx, pi to the alternative a. For i = 1, . . . , n, let ui be a quasi-linear utility function s.t. ϕi (ui) = ti. For this profile, in the first step of the mechanism -- The mechanism is incentive compatible. We will show that Agent i maximizes her utility by reporting truthfully. Let ui ∈ U QL be the utility of Agent i, u−i ∈ ×j6=iU QL be the reports of the other agents, and ha, zi be the outcome of the mechanism when Agent i reports truthfully, i.e., for the profile (ui, u−i). ui = eui and it is mapped to ti and hence the chosen alternative is a. Next, consider a report for Agent i, bui, and let hba,bzi be the outcome for the profile (bui, u−i). We define 9 and for i = 1, . . . , n, the payment of Agent i equals to a⋆ ∈ argmax a∈A ca +Xi∈N pi (ui, u−i) = hi (u−i) − 1/wi ·Xj6=i wi · ui (a, 0)! , wj · uj (a⋆, 0) + ca⋆ note that zi = pi (ti, t−i) (cid:26) a = x (ti, t−i) tj ∈ Tj for j = 1, . . . , n and bti ∈ Ti to be the corresponding types in the first step of the mechanism, and hx, pi is an incentive-compatible mechanism and hence ha, zii is weakly preferred over hba,bzii according to the type ti. Let eui be the utility which ui is mapped to in the first step of the mechanism. Since eui pos-represents ti = ϕi (eui) and our assumption on the payments, we get that eui (a, zi) > eui (ba,bzi) and w ∈ ∆ (N ) and an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA s.t. for any report vector (u1, . . . , un) ∈ (cid:0)U QL(cid:1)N Hence, by the theorems of Roberts [13, Thm. 3.1] and Green-Laffont [4], there exist an agent weight vector the & (cid:26)ba = x(cid:0)bti, t−i(cid:1) bzi = pi(cid:0)bti, t−i(cid:1) . ui (a′, 0) > eui (ba,bzi) + min ui (a, zi) = eui (a, zi) + min ui (a′, 0) = ui (ba,bzi) . alternative returned by the mechanism a⋆ satisfies a′∈A a′∈A hence if wi > 0 and to hi (u−i) otherwise, for some function hi : U−i → ℜ. By Claim 2, if two quasi-linear utility functions u, w ∈ U QL pos-represent a preference ti ∈ Ti, then u and w differ by a constant. Since the set of maximizers, argmaxa∈A(cid:0)ca +Pi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)(cid:1), is invariant to such constant shifts, a⋆ ∈ argmaxa∈A(cid:0)ca +Pi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)(cid:1) for any choice of quasi-linear pos-representations of the agents' types. Hence, we get the required characterization of the allocation rule x. Next, notice that for u, w ∈ U QL as above, u and w are mapped to the same type at the first stage of the mechanism, so also hi does not depend on the pos-representations. I.e., it can be defined as a function ⊓⊔ of the types hi : T−i → ℜ, which gives us the required characterization of the payment rule p. Types represented by quasi-linear utility functions For the special case in which all types of all agents can be represented by quasi-linear utility functions we get as corollaries the following mechanism and theorem. In particular, if the agents are reporting their quasi- linear utility functions, we get the classic incentive-compatibility characterization for quasi-linear utilities of Vickrey, Clarke, Groves, Green-Laffont, and Roberts [15, 2, 5, 13, 4]. Mechanism 2. Given a vector of reports (t1, . . . , tn) for ti ∈ Ti, ◮ Define ui to be an arbitrary quasi-linear utility function which represents ti. • The chosen alternative: x (t1, . . . , tn) = a⋆. • The payment of Agent i: If wi > 0, ◮ Choose a⋆ ∈ argmaxa∈A′(cid:0)ca +Pi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)(cid:1) and return pi (t1, . . . , tn) = hi (t−i) − 1/wi ·ca⋆ +Xj6=i wj · uj (a⋆, 0) , for some function hi which depends only on the reports of the other agents, and in case wi = 0, pi (t1, . . . , tn) = hi (t−i). Theorem 3. If all types of all agents are represented by a quasi-linear utility functions, then 10 (a) Let ∅ 6= A′ ⊆ A, w ∈ ∆ (N ) be an agent weight vector, c ∈ ℜA an alternative cost vector, and hx, pi Mechanism 2 defined by (A′, w, c). Then hx, pi is an incentive-compatible mechanism. (b) If there are at least three alternatives (A > 3) and for all agents i ∈ N , any quasi-linear utility function u ∈ U QL represents some type t ∈ Ti, then any incentive-compatible onto mechanism hx, pi can be defined as Mechanism 2 w.r.t. A′ = A, an agent weight vector w ∈ ∆ (N ), and an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA. Characterizations For completeness, we also show two characterizations, one in utility terms and one in preference terms, of the types which are represented by a quasi-linear function and of the types which are pos-represented by a quasi-linear function. Theorem 4. Let u be a utility function which is strongly downward monotone in money. Then, -- u is represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist a function v : A → ℜ and a strongly monotone function ϕ : ℜ → ℜ s.t. u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z). -- u is pos-represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist a function v : A → ℜ and a strongly monotone function ϕ : ℜ → ℜ s.t. u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z) whenever z 6 v (a). Theorem 5. Let < be a strongly downward monotone in money preference. Then, -- < is represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist an alternative a⋆ ∈ A and a payment z⋆ ∈ ℜ s.t. 1. The preference < is continuous [8, Def. 3.C.1] in money. 3. For any two alternatives x, y ∈ A and payments zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t hx, zxi < hy, zyi it holds that 2. For any x ∈ A there exist zx, bzx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≺ ha⋆, z⋆i ≺ hx, bzxi. ∀α ∈ ℜ hx, zx − αi < hy, zy − αi . -- < is pos-represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist an alternative a⋆ ∈ A and a payment z⋆ ∈ ℜ s.t. 1. For any x ∈ A there exist zx, bzx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≺ ha⋆, z⋆i ≺ hx, bzxi. 2. For any two alternatives x, y ∈ A and payments zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t(cid:26) hx, zxi < hy, zyi hx, zxi < ha⋆, z⋆i ∀α ∈ ℜ+ hx, zx − αi < hy, zy − αi . 4 Discussion Identifying the preference of an agent with her cardinal utility is basic in the theory of modeling economic agents, and in most scenarios, unless additional strong assumptions are added, the utility is only a represen- tation of the preference and does not hold any additional information of the decision behavior of the agent. This rather simple insight allows one to extend incentive-compatibility results (or similar results regarding decisions of individuals) beyond a-priori restrictive domains of utility functions. Moreover, in many cases, one's assumptions on the agents' preferences are mostly irrelevant when considering outcomes below some threshold or an outside option, which might allow us to extend such results even further. In this work, we formalized this insight by defining a new representation notion, pos-representation, and showed that the characterization of VCG mechanisms extends naturally and easily to type sets which are pos-represented by quasi-linear utility functions. The proof technique of a simple reduction to the works of Roberts [13] and Green-Laffont [4] also hints that one could see our characterization as a fuller version of the VCG characterization. We expect that also the characterization of Holmstrom [6] can extended in a similar fashion to characterization of type domains. Holmstrom [6] shows that one can replace the assumption of 11 unrestrictiveness of the valuation domains by a weaker assumption that the domains are smoothly-connected. We also suspect that finding the counterpart of smooth-connectiveness in preferences terms would be inter- esting by its own. We expect this insight to be applicable in many more scenarios in which results deal with quasi-linear utilities while essentially not assuming the cardinal utility is an exact unique representation of the agents' preferences, and moreover when assuming it represents the preferences only for a well-defined subdomain of the outcomes. 4.1 The quasi-linear model (The transferable utility assumption) As we argued in Section 1, our result shows that the main driving-force of the VCG characterization is not the the ability to compare the intensity of preferences of the different agents and in particular we did not assume a transferable utility model. Our mechanism is given the ordinal preferences of the agents and outputs payments but in no place in the characterization we assumed that 'money' is the same commodity for all agents and one could think of scenarios is which the designer would fine different agents using different commodities (a trivial example would be fining using different currencies). The main message we see in our work is that the main driving-force of the VCG characterization is the separability of the agents' preferences and the ability of the designer to fine the agents on a continuous scale, by that leaving the transferable utility domain of quasi-linear utilities and returning to the non-transferable utility domain of Gibbard-Satterthwaite. On the other hand, it is important to note that in our general model, (a) Exactly because lacking the transferable utility assumption, budget-balancedness becomes more complex to define and it no longer implies Pareto-optimality of the mechanism; (b) A randomized mechanism is not necessarily equivalent to a deterministic one (See also below). 5 Other ordinal generalization Common to the pos-representation notion we presented here and the Parallel utilities notion of Ma et al. [7] is that both can be defined as representation by a quasi-linear utility function over a subset of the domain: In the pos-representation case, whenever the utility is above a threshold; And in the Parallel utilities domain, whenever the utility and the payment are positive. In a subsequent work, we follow this common trait and show that our work extends easily to deal with quadrant domains in which both the utility and the payment are bounded from below by some threshold. Moreover, we can generalize the pos-representation assumption of the preferences to assume that a type is pos-represented by a utility function of the form ui (a, z) = ui (a, 0) − φi (z) for some continuous monotone bijection φi : ℜ → ℜ (i.e., an individual utility of money), and our characterization easily extends to this case as well under an additional assumption that the designer knows the functions φi for all agents.4 Last, we note that some of our initial assumptions on the mechanisms can be easily relaxed. 5.1 Non-direct revelation mechanisms One could consider more general mechanisms in which the agents, instead of reporting utility functions or valuation vectors, use more abstract actions in a sequential manner or a one-round one, and instead of incentive-compatibility require implementation using dominant strategies. Applying a simple direct rev- elation principle [11] shows that any such general dominant strategy implementation is equivalent to a direct revelation incentive-compatible mechanism. The two mechanisms implement the same mapping of the agents' private preferences to a chosen alternative and a payment. Hence, more general mechanisms cannot implement different allocation rules than those implemented by direct-revelation mechanisms. Still, one might prefer using non-direct mechanisms for other reasons, like a more natural input language or lower complexity of the mechanism. 4 This knowledge assumption might seems very strong, but note that this is the common assumption in the quasi- linear model. 12 5.2 Non-Deterministic mechanisms The characterization problem of random incentive compatible mechanisms remains open. We did not model the preferences of the agents over lotteries of outcomes, and in particular did not assume they have von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences over lotteries [8, Def. 6.B.5]. Hence we can not derive results regarding truthful mechanisms except the following easy claim. Corollary 3. Given the conditions of Theorem 2, the only universally truthful mechanisms [12, Def. 9.38] (i.e., truth-telling is a dominant strategy for all coin flips by the mechanism) are lotteries over mechanisms of the type of Mechanism 1. Extending our work to random mechanisms, even when assuming von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences, should include also extending the notion of pos-representation. But we conjecture that in many cases such extensions, especially of pos-representation using quasi-linear utility functions, will lose a lot of the bite of the pos-representation notion. 13 References 1. Aleskerov, F.: Categories of Arrovian voting schemes. In: Arrow, K. J., Sen, A., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare,vol. 1, chap. 2, pp. 95 -- 129. Elsevier (2002). 2. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 1, 17 -- 33 (1971). 3. Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41, 587 -- 601 (1973). 4. Green, J., Laffont, J.J.: Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms for the Revelation of Preferences for Public Goods. Econometrica 45(2), 427 -- 438 (1977). 5. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41(4), 617 -- 631 (1973). 6. Holmstrom, B.: Groves' scheme on restricted domains. Econometrica 47(5), 1137 -- 1144 (1979). 7. Ma, H., Meir, R., Parkes, D.C.: Social choice with non quasi-linear utilities. In: Proceedings of 18th ACM Con- ference on Economics and Computation (EC). p. 49 (2018), full version: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02268 8. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., Green, J.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press (1995). 9. Moulin, H.: On strategy-proofness and single peakedness. Public Choice 35(4), 437 -- 455 (1980). 10. Moulin, H.: Cooperative Microeconomics: A Game-Theoretic Introduction. Princeton University Press (1995). 11. Myerson, R.B.: Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47, 61 -- 74 (1979). 12. Nisan, N.: Introduction to mechanism design (for computer scientists). In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory, chap. 9, pp. 209 -- 241. Cambridge University Press (2007). 13. Roberts, K.: The characterization of implementable choice rules. In: Laffont, J.J. (ed.) Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences, pp. 321 -- 349. North-Holland (1979). 14. Satterthwaite, M.A.: Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187 -- 217 (1975). 15. Vickrey, W.: Utility, strategy, and social decision rules. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 74(4), 507 -- 535 (1960). 14 A Proof of Claim 1 Claim. Let u, w : A × ℜ → ℜ be two quasi-linear utility functions. Then the following three statements are equivalent: 1. Both u and w represent the same preference over A × ℜ. 2. There exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. for any alternative a ∈ A 3. There exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. for any alternative a ∈ A and z ∈ ℜ u (a, z) = w (a, z) + C. u (a, 0) = w (a, 0) + C. Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): If both u and w represent the same preference, then ∀a, b ∈ A, za, zb ∈ ℜ u (a, za) > u (b, zb) ⇐⇒ w (a, za) > w (b, zb) . Both u and w are quasi-linear so we get that ∀a, b ∈ A, za, zb ∈ ℜ u (a, 0) − u (b, 0) > (za − zb) ⇐⇒ w (a, 0) − w (b, 0) > (za − zb) , and hence ∀a, b ∈ A u (a, 0) − u (b, 0) = w (a, 0) − w (b, 0) and there exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. ∀a ∈ A u (a, 0) = w (a, 0) + C. (2) ⇒ (3): Since u (a, z) = u (a, 0) − z and w (a, z) = w (a, 0) − z, this is a trivial derivation. (3) ⇒ (1): If there exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ u (a, z) = w (a, z) + C, then ∀a, b ∈ A, za, zb ∈ ℜ u (a, za) > u (b, zb) ⇐⇒ w (a, za) > w (b, zb) . ⊓⊔ 15 B Proof of Claim 2 Claim. Let u, w : A × ℜ → ℜ be two quasi-linear utility functions. 1. If both u and w pos-represent the same preference, then there exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ w (a, z) = u (a, z) + C. 2. If there exists a positive constant C > 0 s.t. then w pos-represents any preference which is pos-represented by u. ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ w (a, z) = u (a, z) − C, Proof. 1. If both u and v pos-represent the same preference, then for any two alternatives a, b ∈ A and za, zb ∈ ℜ s.t. za 6 min (u (a, 0) , w (a, 0)) we get that u (a, za) > 0 and w (a, za) > 0 so u (a, za) > u (b, zb) ⇐⇒ w (a, za) > w (b, zb) . Both u and w are quasi-linear so we get that u (a, 0) − u (b, 0) > (za − zb) ⇐⇒ w (a, 0) − w (b, 0) > (za − zb) , and hence ∀a, b ∈ A u (a, 0) − u (b, 0) = w (a, 0) − w (b, 0) and there exists a constant C ∈ ℜ s.t. ∀a ∈ A u (a, 0) = w (a, 0) + C, and ∀a ∈ A, z ∈ ℜ u (a, z) = w (a, z) + C. 2. Let < be a preference which is pos-represented by u. Let a, b ∈ A be two alternatives and za, zb ∈ ℜ two payments s.t. either w (a, za) > 0 or w (b, zb) > 0. Then, either u (a, za) > w (a, za) > 0 or u (b, zb) > w (b, zb) > 0, and w (a, za) > w (b, zb) ⇐⇒ u (a, za) > u (b, zb) ⇐⇒ ha, zai < hb, zbi . ⊓⊔ 16 C Proof of Corollary 2 Corollary. If there are at least three alternatives and the type sets {Ti}i∈N satisfy the conditions of Thm. 2, then for any incentive-compatible onto mechanism hx, pi without transfers (i.e., pi (t1, . . . , tn) ≡ 0 for all i ∈ N ), there exists a unique agent d ∈ N (a dictator) s.t. for any type profile (t1, . . . , tn) x (t1, . . . , tn) ∈ argmax a∈A ud (a, 0) . Proof. By Thm. 2, there exists an agent weight vector w ∈ ∆ (N ) and an alternative cost vector c ∈ ℜA s.t. for any report vector, x (t1, . . . , tn) ∈ argmax a∈A ca +Xi∈N wi · ui (a, 0)! . Let d ∈ N be an agent s.t. wd > 0 and notice that if Agent d knows the actions of the others she can enforce any outcome in A. Since there are no monetary transfers and the mechanism is incentive compatible we get that for any type profile (t1, . . . , tn) Since this property cannot hold for two different agents the dictator must be unique. ⊓⊔ x (t1, . . . , tn) ∈ argmax a∈A ud (a, 0) . 17 D Proof of Theorem 4 Claim 3. Let u be a utility function which is strongly downward monotone in money. Then, u is represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist a function v : A → ℜ and a strongly monotone function ϕ : ℜ → ℜ s.t. u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z) . Proof. ⇐: Trivial since ϕ (v (a) − z) and (v (a) − z) represent the same preference. ⇒: By definition, there exists a function v : A → ℜ s.t. for any x, y ∈ A and zx, zy ∈ ℜ and in particular u (x, zx) > u (y, zy) ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx > v (y) − zy, u (x, zx) = u (y, zy) ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx = v (y) − zy, and u (x, zx) = u (y, zx + v (y) − v (x)) . Let a⋆ be an arbitrary alternative and define a mapping ϕ : ℜ → ℜ by ϕ (α) = u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − α). Then, ϕ is monotone: If α < β then v (a⋆) − α > v (a⋆) − β and hence ϕ (α) = u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − α) < u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − β) = ϕ (β) . u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z): For any a ∈ A and z ∈ ℜ: u (a, z) = u (a⋆, z + v (a⋆) − v (a)) ⊓⊔ = ϕ (v (a) − z) . 18 Claim 4. Let u be a utility function which is strongly downward monotone in money. Then u is pos- represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist a function v : A → ℜ and a strongly monotone function ϕ : ℜ → ℜ s.t. u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z) whenever z 6 v (a) . Proof. ⇐: Trivial since ϕ (v (a) − z) and (v (a) − z) represent the same preference and hence pos-represented by the same utility functions. ⇒: By definition, there exists a function v : A → ℜ s.t. for any two alternatives x, y ∈ A and payments zx, zy ∈ ℜ, if v (x) > zx, u (x, zx) > u (y, zy) ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx > v (y) − zy, and in particular u (x, zx) = u (y, zy) ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx = v (y) − zy, and u (x, zx) = u (y, zx + v (y) − v (x)) . Let a⋆ be an arbitrary alternative and define a mapping ϕ : ℜ → ℜ by ϕ (α) =(α > 0 u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − α) α 6 0 u (a⋆, v (a⋆)) + α. Then, ϕ is monotone: -- If α < β 6 0 then ϕ (β) − ϕ (α) = β − α > 0. -- If 0 6 α < β then ϕ (β) − ϕ (α) = u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − β) − u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − α) > 0. -- If α 6 0 < β then ϕ (α) = u (a⋆, v (a⋆)) + α 6 u (a⋆, v (a⋆)) < u (a, z) = ϕ (v (a) − z) whenever z 6 v (a): For any a ∈ A and z 6 v (a): u (a⋆, v (a⋆) − β) = ϕ (β). u (a, z) = u (a⋆, z + v (a⋆) − v (a)) ⊓⊔ = ϕ (v (a) − z) . 19 that there exist z1 < z2 < z3 s.t. (cid:26) ha, z1i ≺ ha, z2i  ha, z1i ≺ ha, z2i ha, z2i ≻ ha, z3i ha, z3i ≻ ha, z1i (3), for any 0 6 k 6 n ha, z2i ≻ ha, z3i are symmetric). By (1) there exists z′ and ha, z3i 4 ha, z1i (the cases(cid:26) ha, z1i ≻ ha, z2i ha, z2i ≺ ha, z3i and 3 ∈ (z1, z3] s.t. ha, z1i ∼ ha, z′ 3i. W.l.o.g., z′ 3 = z3. By E Proof of Theorem 5 Claim 5. A preference < is represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist an alternative a⋆ ∈ A and a payment z⋆ ∈ ℜ s.t. 1. The preference < is continuous in money. 2. For any x ∈ A there exists zx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≻ ha⋆, z⋆i. For any x ∈ A there exists zx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≺ ha⋆, z⋆i. 3. For any two alternatives x, y ∈ A and payments zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t hx, zxi < hy, zyi it holds that ∀α ∈ ℜ hx, zx − αi < hy, zy − αi . Proof. ⇒: Trivial by the properties of quasi-linear functions. ⇐: First, we show that given any alternative a ∈ A, < is weakly monotone in money. Assume for contradiction ha, z1i ∼ ha, z1 + k/n (z3 − z1)i ∼ ha, z1i . On the other hand, by (1) there exists a ε > 0 s.t. ∀z′ 2 s.t. z2 − z′ 2 < ε ha, z′ 2i ≻ ha, z1i , so we get a contradiction. Moreover, we show that < is strongly monotone in money. Assume for contradiction that there exist z1 < z2 s.t. ha, z1i ∼ ha, z2i. Then, by weak monotonicity, for any z ∈ [z1, z2] ha, z1i ∼ ha, zi ∼ ha, z2i , and by (3) ha, z1i ∼ ha, zi for any z ∈ ℜ, in contradiction to (2). Note that it cannot be that < is upward monotone in money for some x ∈ A and downward monotone for a different y ∈ A. Otherwise, by (2), there exist zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≻ ha⋆, z⋆i ≻ hy, zyi, and by the monotonicity and (2), there exists δ > 0 large enough s.t. hx, zx − δi ≺ ha⋆, z⋆i and hy, zy − δi ≻ ha⋆, z⋆i , in contradiction to (3). W.l.o.g, assume that < is strongly downward monotone in money (Otherwise, we'll show it is represented by a utility function quasi-linear in (−z)). Next, we define v : A → ℜ by v (x) = max {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} , and note that -- By (1) the set {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} is closed. Hence, the maximum exists. Moreover, because of (1), it holds that hx, v (x)i ∼ ha⋆, z⋆i and -- By (2) the set {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} is not empty and bounded from above. Now, for any x, y ∈ A and zx, zy ∈ ℜ ∀x, y ∈ A hx, v (x)i ∼ hy, v (y)i . hx, zxi < hy, zyi ⇐⇒ (3) hx, v (x)i < hy, zy + v (x) − zxi ⇐⇒ hy, v (y)i < hy, zy + v (x) − zxi ⇐⇒ (M ON )v (y) 6 zy + v (x) − zx ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx > v (y) − zy. ⊓⊔ 20 Claim 6. A strongly downward monotone in money preference < is pos-represented by a quasi-linear utility function iff there exist an alternative a⋆ ∈ A and a payment z⋆ ∈ ℜ s.t. 1. For any x ∈ A there exists a payment zx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≻ ha⋆, z⋆i. For any x ∈ A there exists a payment zx ∈ ℜ s.t. hx, zxi ≺ ha⋆, z⋆i. 2. For any two alternatives x, y ∈ A and payments zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t(cid:26) hx, zxi < hy, zyi hx, zxi < ha⋆, z⋆i ∀α ∈ ℜ+ hx, zx − αi < hy, zy − αi . Proof. ⇒: Trivial by the properties of quasi-linear functions and choosing a⋆ and z⋆ s.t. the quasi-linear function satisfies u (a⋆, z⋆) = 0. ⇐: First, we note that since < is strongly monotone, it is continuous in money.5 Let a ∈ A and {zt} , {wt} be two sequences of monetary transfers s.t. ∀t ha, zti 4 ha, wti, limt→∞ zt = z, and limt→∞ wt = p. Then, ∀t wt 6 zt and hence w 6 z and ha, wi < ha, zi. Next, we define v : A → ℜ by v (x) = max {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} , and note that -- By continuity the set {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} is closed. Hence, the maximum exists. Moreover, because of the continuity, it holds that hx, v (x)i ∼ ha⋆, z⋆i and -- By (1) the set {z hx, zi < ha⋆, z⋆i} is not empty and bounded from above. Now, for any x, y ∈ A and zx, zy ∈ ℜ s.t. v (x) − zx > 0 ∀x, y ∈ A hx, v (x)i ∼ hy, v (y)i . hx, zxi < hy, zyi ⇐⇒ (2) hx, v (x)i < hy, zy + v (x) − zxi ⇐⇒ hy, v (y)i < hy, zy + v (x) − zxi ⇐⇒ (M ON )v (y) 6 zy + v (x) − zx ⇐⇒ v (x) − zx > v (y) − zy. ⊓⊔ 5 We note that this claim does not hold for weakly downward monotone preferences. For example, the preference which is defined by u (a, z) = (z 6 0 z > 0 1 0 is weakly downward monotone in money but is not continuous. The preference is not continuous since ∀n ha, 1/ni 4 ha, 1/2i but ha, 0i ≻ ha, 1/2i. 21
1810.10604	2	1810	2019-02-20T14:06:50	Revealed Stochastic Preference: A One-Paragraph Proof and Generalization	[ "econ.TH" ]	McFadden and Richter (1991) and later McFadden (2005) show that the Axiom of Revealed Stochastic Preference characterizes rationalizability of choice probabilities through random utility models on finite universal choice spaces. This note proves the result in one short, elementary paragraph and extends it to set valued choice. The latter requires a different axiom than is reported in McFadden (2005).	econ.TH	econ	Revealed Stochastic Preference: A One-Paragraph Proof and Generalization Jorg Stoye∗ January 16th, 2019 Abstract McFadden and Richter (1991) and later McFadden (2005) show that the Axiom of Re- vealed Stochastic Preference characterizes rationalizability of choice probabilities through random utility models on finite universal choice spaces. This note proves the result in one short, elementary paragraph and extends it to set valued choice. The latter requires a different axiom than is reported in McFadden (2005). Keywords: Revealed Stochastic Preference; Random Utility. JEL Code: D11. 1 Introduction McFadden and Richter (1991) and McFadden (2005) show that, for a finite choice universe and singleton-valued choice, the Axiom of Revealed Stochastic Preference (ARSP) is necessary and sufficient for rationalizability of stochastic choice through a random utility model. This note proves the same result in one short and "chatty" paragraph. Indeed, setting up an efficient notation makes the result so immediate that one might hesitate to report it. However, the precise argument appears to have been overlooked.1 Furthermore, it immediately applies to set-valued choice. The resulting generalization is novel; in particular, if "decisiveness" of choice were dropped in McFadden (2005), the axiom reported there would be too weak. 2 The Classic Setting and Result Consider a set of choice problems defined as subsets of a finite choice universe.2 Suppose a researcher observes the corresponding choice probabilities. The question is whether these ∗Department of Economics, Cornell University, [email protected]. This note was motivated by joint work with Yuichi Kitamura. Thanks to an anonymous referee for helpful comments. Financial support through NSF Grants SES-1260980 and SES-1824375 is gratefully acknowledged. 1The proofs in McFadden and Richter (1991) and Border (2007) take several pages. The proof in McFadden (2005) is one dense paragraph but goes through several intermediate characterizations and invokes duality, though some of that is to also establish other characterizations. Gul and Pesendorfer (2006, p.123) call the ARSP and related axioms "complicated restrictions on arbitrary finite collections of decision problems" that are "difficult to interpret." They establish the result by relating ARSP to their own axioms. Within the considerable literature inspired by Falmagne (1978), the basic geometry of random utility models is folk knowledge, but the focus is on other questions. 2This setting encompasses a classic demand setting with finitely many budgets because all revealed pref- erence information is then contained in choice probabilities corresponding to a certain finite partition of the choice universe. See McFadden (2005) and Kitamura and Stoye (2018). 1 probabilities can be rationalized through maximization of a random utility function. The random utility could reflect randomness in an individual's utility assessment but also unob- served heterogeneity if data are from a repeated cross-section. Also, it will become clear that the underlying notion of nonstochastic utility is very flexible. It will be useful to formalize everything in terms of vectors. Thus, identify the finite choice universe with components of a vector X = (x1, . . . , xK). Any choice problem C is a subvector of X. For any observable C, the corresponding choice probabilities will be collected in a vector π(C) ∈ ∆C−1, the (C − 1)-dimensional unit simplex. Let C = (C1, . . . , CJ ) collect all observable choice problems in arbitrary (but henceforth fixed) order. We can then represent the totality of observed choice probabilities by the vector Π ≡ (π(C1), . . . , π(CJ )). Note that Π ∈ [0, 1]I , where I ≡(cid:80)J j=1 Cj, and that the components of Π sum to J. A set of particular interest will be the collection of rationalizable nonstochastic choice behaviors, i.e. the set of rationalizable choice functions on C. For example, rationalizability could be defined through independence of irrelevant alternatives for individual choice (Arrow, 1959) or (in a demand context) the Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (Afriat, 1967); in either case, the nonstochastic rationality concept then is utility maximization. But "ratio- nalizability" is used in a very broad sense -- one could easily define more narrow, more lenient, or also nonnested criteria.3 Any choice function can be expressed as a vector R ∈ {0, 1}I that is interpreted just like Π but whose entries are binary, with exactly one entry of 1 for each choice problem. Let the set R, which is necessarily finite, collect the vector representations of all rationalizable choice functions. We call Π stochastically rationalizable if it can be generated by the "random utility" extension of the notion of rationalizability embodied in R, that is, if the choice probabilities Π can be generated by drawing a nonstochastic "choice type" R from some (arbitrary but fixed) distribution on R and then executing this type's nonstochastic choices. In short, the set of stochastically rationalizable choice probabilities Π is the convex hull of R, a finite polytope that is henceforth denoted co(R). McFadden and Richter (1991) characterize this notion of rationalizability through the ARSP, an axiom about sequences of subsets of choice problems and corresponding choice probabilities. The present notation allows for a succinct statement. To this purpose, let a trial T ∈ {0, 1}I be a vector whose "1" entries correspond to (some or all) elements of the same choice problem. Intuitively, any trial characterizes a specific subset of a specific choice problem. (If the same subset of X appears as subset of distinct choice problems, this gives rise to distinct trials.) Let the finite set T collect all possible trials. Then we have: Axiom of Revealed Stochastic Preference (ARSP) For any finite sequence (T1, . . . , TM ) ∈ T M , M ≤ ∞, one has M(cid:88) m=1 M(cid:88) m=1 TmΠ ≤ max R∈R TmR. In words, the choice probabilities corresponding to any finite sequence of trials cannot add up to more than the maximal analogous sum induced by a nonstochastic choice function in R. We then have: Theorem 1: Π is stochastically rationalizable if, and only if, ARSP holds. 3See Deb, Kitamura, Quah, and Stoye (2018) for a recent random utility model of the latter kind. [2] Proof. The sequence (T1, . . . , TM ) matters only through(cid:80)M m=1 Tm. This sum is an I-vector with integer components and (because the canonical basis of RI is in T ) any I-vector with integer components can be expressed as such a sum. Hence, ARSP can be rewritten as + with integer components + with rational components R∈R T R for all vectors T ∈ RI R∈R T R for all vectors T ∈ RI R∈R T R for all vectors T ∈ RI R∈R T R for all vectors T ∈ RI + T Π ≤ max (1)⇔ T Π ≤ max (2)⇔ T Π ≤ max (3)⇔ T Π ≤ max (4)⇔ Π ∈ co(R). Here, (1) holds because inequalities can be multiplied by positive scalars; (2) holds because weak inequalities are preserved under limit taking and all vectors in RI + can be approximated by rational ones. To see (3), let 1 ≡ (1, . . . , 1) ∈ RI , then 1Π = J but also 1R = J for any R ∈ R. Thus, T Π ≤ max R∈R T R ⇔ (T + 1 · (cid:107)T(cid:107)∞)Π ≤ max + even if T is not. (Recall that (cid:107)T(cid:107)∞ is the largest absolute value and T + 1 · (cid:107)T(cid:107)∞ ∈ RI taken by any component of T .) Finally, (4) is an elementary property of convex hulls. R∈R (T + 1 · (cid:107)T(cid:107)∞)R, The theorem is not new but the proof reflects two contributions. First, its almost em- barrassing simplicity is partly due to efficient notation, i.e. to recognizing that with a finite universal choice space, all important quantities can be expressed as vectors and choice prob- abilities then as inner products. That ARSP prevents Π from being separable from co(R) in any positive direction is then near immediate and has also been anticipated in the literature. The second contribution is to notice that adding-up constraints on Π and R relate separation in any direction to separation in a positive direction. The result's exposition also renders immediate some (previously known) facts about ARSP and co(R). For example, while there are infinitely many conceivable sequences (T1, ..., TM ), a finite subset of "essential" sequences suffices to characterize stochastic rationalizability. In particular, the essential sequences correspond to gradients of full-dimensional faces of co(R). These gradients are rational because co(R) is spanned by binary vectors; therefore, the essential sequences are indeed finite. The gradients are known in some special cases: For binary choice and K ≤ 5, they correspond to the Block-Marschak triangle inequalities (Dridi, 1980), and they can be explicitly computed for the consumer choice problem with finitely many goods and 3 budgets (Kitamura and Stoye, 2018, display 4.7) or with finitely many budgets and 2 goods (Hoderlein and Stoye, 2015). However, computing them is equivalent to deriving the halfspace representation of the polytope co(R) from its vertex representation, and this transformation is in general computationally prohibitive.4 4See Ziegler (1995) for more on these representations. The difficulty of this computation is illustrated by the intricate literature on finding facet defining inequalities for the linear order polytope (Fishburn, 1992). [3] 3 Extension to Set Valued Choice With a finite choice universe, the above analysis is easily extended to choice correspondences, i.e. set-valued choice functions. Specifically, define a new choice universe X ≡ 2X , the subsets of X. Any choice problem C in the original problem can be identified with a new problem C ≡ 2C. Then any data set concerning set valued choice on (C1, ..., CJ ) can be interpreted as data set with unique choice on ( C1, ..., CJ ). A choice probability Π, a collection R of rationalizable nonstochastic behaviors, and a set T of possible trials can be defined as before. Asserting the ARSP for these new quantities yields: Generalized Axiom of Revealed Stochastic Preference (GARSP) For any finite sequence ( T1, . . . , TM ) ∈ T M , M ≤ ∞, one has M(cid:88) m=1 M(cid:88) m=1 Tm Π ≤ max R∈ R Tm R. Then the previous proof establishes: Theorem 2: Π is stochastically rationalizable if, and only if, GARSP holds. Trivial as it may seem, this extension appears novel and contains two insights. • Contrary to most of the literature, the empty set is included in the choice universe and all choice problems. Thus, Theorem 2 applies to the stochastic extension of incomplete preference models and the like. If the underlying nonstochastic choice model excludes the empty set, this will be reflected in R and, therefore, in all rationalizable Π.5 • McFadden and Richter (1991) restrict attention to singleton-valued choice "for simplic- ity" (footnote 2); McFadden (2005) presents an extremely general setup and passes to singleton-valued choice only after defining ARSP. While neither formally characterize set-valued stochastic choice, the reader might infer that, for example, Theorem 3.3 in McFadden (2005) holds with ARSP as reported there even if the choice function is not singleton valued. This is not the case. Both papers define choice probability as the probability that a set or any of its subsets are chosen from the corresponding bud- get. This does not lose information and makes no difference at all for singleton-valued choice. But with set-valued choice, asserting ARSP for this probability restricts trials to query a set and all its subsets within a specific choice problem. This is a small subset of the trial sequences that are actually needed, so the restriction to single-valued choice is crucial and the axiom is otherwise too weak.6 5The same applies if R forces choice of singletons, in which case Theorem 1 is recovered. 6Consider any setting where at least one choice problem is not a singleton, any R that restricts choice to be singleton-valued, and the choice probability Π that always selects the entire choice problem. For any trial that queries an entire choice problem and all its subsets, Π as well as any R ∈ R return value 1. For any other trial, Π returns 0. Thus ARSP as defined in McFadden (2005, section 2.3.3) is fulfilled, but Π /∈ co(R). For that paper's Theorem 3.3 to apply to set-valued choice, choice probabilities should be defined as explained above and the set inclusions in expressions (1) and (2) should be equalities. [4] 4 Conclusion This note concisely proves that rationalizability of stochastic choice is characterized by (G)ARSP. Most of the work is done by a vector notation which obviates that the axiom really restricts separating hyperplanes. Beyond its simplicity, the approach (i) further clar- ifies some known facts about stochastic rationalizability and (ii) immediately generalizes to set-valued choice, where it allows for indecisive (empty valued) choice and clarifies the ap- propriate axiom. References Afriat, S. N. (1967): "The Construction of Utility Functions from Expenditure Data," International Economic Review, 8(1), 67 -- 77. Arrow, K. J. (1959): "Rational Choice Functions and Orderings," Economica, 26(102), 121 -- 127. Border, K. (2007): "Introductory Notes on Stochastic Rationality," California Institute of Technology. Deb, R., Y. Kitamura, J. K.-H. Quah, and J. Stoye (2018): "Revealed Price Preference: Theory and Empirical Analysis," CeMMAP working paper CWP57/18. Dridi, T. (1980): "Sur les distributions binaires associes des distributions ordinales," Math- matiques et Sciences Humaines, 69, 15 -- 31. Falmagne, J. (1978): "A representation theorem for finite random scale systems," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18(1), 52 -- 72. Fishburn, P. C. (1992): "Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: a status report," Mathematical Social Sciences, 23(1), 67 -- 80. Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer (2006): "Random Expected Utility," Econometrica, 74(1), 121 -- 146. Hoderlein, S., and J. Stoye (2015): "Testing stochastic rationality and predicting stochastic demand: the case of two goods," Economic Theory Bulletin, 3(2), 313 -- 328. Kitamura, Y., and J. Stoye (2018): "Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models," Econometrica, 86, 1883 -- 1909. McFadden, D. (2005): "Revealed Stochastic Preference: A Synthesis," Economic Theory, 26(2), 245 -- 264. McFadden, D., and K. Richter (1991): "Stochastic rationality and revealed stochastic preference," in Preferences, Uncertainty and Rationality, ed. by J. Chipman, D. McFadden, and K. Richter, pp. 161 -- 186. Westview Press, Boulder. Ziegler, G. M. (1995): Lectures on polytopes, Graduate texts in mathematics. Springer, New York. [5]
1005.4981	1	1005	2010-05-27T04:03:49	The Effect of the Radial Pressure Gradient in Protoplanetary Disks on Planetesimal Formation	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The streaming instability (SI) provides a promising mechanism for planetesimal formation because of its ability to concentrate solids into dense clumps. The degree of clumping strongly depends on the height-integrated solid to gas mass ratio Z in protoplanetary disks (PPDs). In this letter, we show that the magnitude of the radial pressure gradient (RPG) which drives the SI (characterized by $q\equiv{\eta}v_K/c_s$, where ${\eta}v_K$ is the reduction of Keplerian velocity due to the RPG and $c_s$ is the sound speed) also strongly affects clumping. We present local two-dimensional hybrid numerical simulations of aerodynamically coupled particles and gas in the midplane of PPDs. Magnetic fields and particle self-gravity are ignored. We explore three different RPG values appropriate for typical PPDs: $q=0.025, 0.05$ and 0.1. For each $q$ value, we consider four different particle size distributions ranging from sub millimeter to meter sizes and run simulations with solid abundance from Z=0.01 up to Z=0.07. We find that a small RPG strongly promotes particle clumping in that: 1) At fixed particle size distribution, the critical solid abundance $Z_{\rm crit}$ above which particle clumping occurs monotonically increases with $q$; 2) At fixed Z, strong clumping can occur for smaller particles when $q$ is smaller. Therefore, we expect planetesimals to form preferentially in regions of PPDs with a small RPG.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Effect of the Radial Pressure Gradient in Protoplanetary Disks on Planetesimal Formation Xue-Ning Bai & James M. Stone Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544 [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The streaming instability (SI) provides a promising mechanism for planetesi- mal formation because of its ability to concentrate solids into dense clumps. The degree of clumping strongly depends on the height-integrated solid to gas mass ratio Z in protoplanetary disks (PPDs). In this letter, we show that the mag- nitude of the radial pressure gradient (RPG) which drives the SI (characterized by q ≡ ηvK/cs, where ηvK is the reduction of Keplerian velocity due to the RPG and cs is the sound speed) also strongly affects clumping. We present local two- dimensional hybrid numerical simulations of aerodynamically coupled particles and gas in the midplane of PPDs. Magnetic fields and particle self-gravity are ignored. We explore three different RPG values appropriate for typical PPDs: q = 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1. For each q value, we consider four different particle size distributions ranging from sub-millimeter to meter sizes and run simulations with solid abundance from Z = 0.01 up to Z = 0.07. We find that a small RPG strongly promotes particle clumping in that: 1) At fixed particle size dis- tribution, the critical solid abundance Zcrit above which particle clumping occurs monotonically increases with q; 2) At fixed Z, strong clumping can occur for smaller particles when q is smaller. Therefore, we expect planetesimals to form preferentially in regions of PPDs with a small RPG. Subject headings: diffusion - hydrodynamics - instabilities - planetary sys- tems: protoplanetary disks - planets and satellites: formation - turbulence 1. Introduction Planetesimals are super-kilometer sized bodies that are the building blocks of planets (Safronov 1969; Chiang & Youdin 2009), yet their formation has long been a mystery. Mil- limeter and centimeter sized particles are routinely observed in protoplanetary disks (PPDs) (Wilner et al. 2005; Rodmann et al. 2006; Natta et al. 2007; Lommen et al. 2010), but parti- cles with larger size seem difficult to form by coagulation (Blum & Wurm 2008; Guttler et al. 2009). Solids close to meter size further suffer from rapid radial drift due to the negative ra- dial pressure gradient (RPG) in PPDs (Weidenschilling 1977). The gravitational instability – 2 – (GI) scenario of planetesimal formation (Goldreich & Ward 1973) also has difficulties, be- cause even without an external source of turbulence, the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI) generated from the dusty midplane layer prevents the onset of GI unless the local height- integrated solid to gas mass ratio (Z, hereafter referred to as solid abundance) is about an order of magnitude above solar metallicity (Weidenschilling 1980; Sekiya 1998; Youdin & Shu 2002). It was found recently that the drag interaction between solids and gas leads to a powerful instability (Goodman & Pindor 2000). This "streaming instability" (SI, Youdin & Goodman 2005) results in spontaneous particle clumping from the equilibrium state between solids and gas (Nakagawa et al. 1986). Numerical simulations demonstrate that the non-linear saturation of the SI concentrates particles into dense clumps (Johansen & Youdin 2007), promoting planetesimal formation by collective particle self-gravity, bypassing the meter- size barrier. Indeed, Johansen et al. (2007, 2009) showed that planetesimals with sizes of a few hundred kilometers form rapidly by the SI from centi-meter to decimeter sized pebbles and rocks, consistent with constraints from the asteroid belt (Morbidelli et al. 2009). This letter complements our previous work on the dynamics of particle and gas in the midplane of PPDs (Bai & Stone 2010b, hereafter BS10). We consider a wide size distri- bution of particles ranging from sub-millimeter up to meter sizes as an approximation for the outcome of dust coagulation in PPDs (Birnstiel et al. 2010; Zsom et al. 2010). External sources of turbulence such as magnetorotational instability are ignored, as appropriate for the dead zones in PPDs (Gammie 1996; Stone et al. 2000; Bai & Goodman 2009), while SI is the main source of turbulence due to particle settling. Particle self-gravity is ignored in our simulations, as we focus on the precursor of planetesimal formation: particle clumping. The SI is powered by the RPG in the gaseous disk. The RPG reduces the gas orbital velocity (in the absence of solids) by a fraction η of the Keplerian velocity vK = Ωr, and is characterized by q ≡ ηvK/cs = ηr/Hg , (1) where cs is the isothermal sound speed, and Hg = cs/Ω is the scale height of the gaseous disk. In BS10, we assumed q = 0.05 throughout, while in reality q depends on the parameters of, and location in, the disk. The strength of the SI turbulence scales with the RPG, which in turn affects the particle-gas dynamics in the disk midplane. In particular, we show in this letter that particle clumping strongly depends on the RPG, which has important implications for planetesimal formation. 2. Simulations We perform two-dimensional (2D) hybrid simulations of gas and solids using the Athena code (Stone et al. 2008; Bai & Stone 2010a), where gas is treated as a hydrodynamical fluid (without magnetic field) on an Eulerian grid, and the solids are treated as superparticles, – 3 – each representing a swarm of real particles. We model a local patch of the PPDs using the shearing sheet approximation. The dynamical equations are written in a reference frame corotating at the Keplerian frequency Ω at fiducial radius r. We assume axisymmetry, and the simulations are performed in the radial-vertical (x-z) plane, where Ω is along the z direction and x points radially outward. The particles are coupled to the gas via aerodynamic drag, characterized by the stopping time tstop, with momentum feedback included. The gas is assumed to be isothermal, with midplane density ρg. Vertical gravity gz = −Ω2z is included for both particles and the gas. The dynamical equations and simulation setup are identical to those in BS10. Specif- ically, we consider a particle size distribution that is discretized into a number of particle size bins, with each bin covering half a dex in τs ≡ Ωtstop, bounded by the minimum and maximum stopping time τmin and τmax. In what follows, we label our simulations with names of the form Rmn, where m, n are integers obtained by τmin = 10−m and τmax = 10−n, thus run Rmn uses 2(m − n) + 1 particle size bins (or particle species). We use a variety of grid resolution and box sizes to capture the fastest growing modes of the SI, and we use 105 particles per species in all our simulations. We assume uniform mass distribution across all particle size bins, with total solid abundance Z. As in BS10, we consider four groups of runs, R41, R21, R30 and R10. For each particle size distribution, we perform simulations with three different values of the RPG parameter: q = 0.025, 0.05 and 0.10. According to equations (4) and (7) in BS10, the dependence of q on disk parameters such as temperature and mass is relatively weak, thus our range of q covers a large parameter space of disk models. For each set of runs, we perform a series of simulations with different Z values, starting at Z = 0.01 and increasing the value by 0.01 for each new run, until strong particle clumping occurs or Z = 0.07. Our simulation run parameters are summarized in Table 1. They are identical to the 2D run parameters in BS10, but use different values for q and a larger range in Z. Since the natural length scale of the SI is ηr, we use smaller (bigger) simulation box sizes for smaller (larger) q values so that ηr is resolved by an equal number of grid cells in each series of runs. All simulations are run for at least 900Ω−1. Three-dimensional (3D) simulation with the inclusion of the azimuthal dimension is necessary to capture the KHI (Chiang 2008; Barranco 2009), which is mainly caused by the vertical shear in the gas azimuthal velocity. Our simulations are 2D rather than 3D for two reasons. First, for our adopted particle size distribution, the turbulence generated from the SI stops particles from settling before the onset KHI (BS10), at least for the q = 0.05 case. Second, in order to properly resolve the SI, relatively high resolution is required (Bai & Stone 2010a), and particle clumping does depend on resolution1. Simulations in 3D with such high resolution are too costly due to the small box size (thus time step), especially for q = 0.025. 1For example, Run R30Z3-3D in BS10 has no particle clumping in our standard resolution, but shows clumping at lower resolution. – 4 – 3. Particle Clumping The simulations saturate in about 50-100 orbits. Particle settling triggers the SI, and particles with different stopping times are maintained at different heights determined by the balance between settling and turbulent diffusion. Most interestingly, SI efficiently concen- trate particles into dense clumps when the solid abundance is sufficiently high (Johansen et al. 2009, BS10). In Figure 1 we plot the evolution of maximum particle density ρp,max for the R30 runs with different values of q and Z. There is a clear dichotomy in the evolution: either the maximum particle density stays at a relatively small value (ρp,max . 50ρg), or it reaches as high as 103ρg, indicative of strong clumping. A particle clump becomes gravitationally bound when its density exceeds the Roche density (see equation (18) of BS10), which also is of the order 103ρg for typical PPDs. Therefore, particle clumping is a prelude to planetesimal formation via gravitational collapse. For each value of q, the transition from non-clumping to clumping is sharp as Z gradually increases, and we can define a critical solid abunance Zcrit, where strong particle clumping occurs for Z > Zcrit. Comparing different panels indicates that Zcrit monotonically increases with q. To better demonstrate the effect of the disk RPG on planetesimal formation, we plot the maximum particle density as a function of solid abundance Z for each group of simulations with all values of q in Figure 2. The maximum density is taken from the largest value of ρp,max over the last 20 orbits of the simulations, when all the runs are fully saturated. We take ρp = 500ρg (which is the same order as the Roche density) as a rough indicator of planetesimal formation, as shown by the dotted lines. For each value of q, one can determine Zcrit at the intersection of the dashed and corresponding solid lines. We see that for all four groups of runs, Zcrit monotonically increases with q. Moreover, Zcrit depends on q more sensitively when the particle size is on average smaller. When q = 0.025, Zcrit is about 0.015 for all our four groups of runs. For q = 0.1, run R41 does not show particle clumping below Z = 0.07, for runs R21 and R30 Zcrit is about 0.06, while for runs R10 Zcrit drops to below 0.05. Particle clumping is a highly non-linear effect due to the SI, and is more likely to develop when the average disk midplane solid to gas mass ratio ǫ is large. If one assumes D to be the midplane vertical diffusion coefficient of the SI turbulence, particles with stopping time τs would settle to a layer with thickness of the order Hp ≈ pD/Ωτs. The diffusion coefficient D depends on the particle size distribution, ǫ ≈ ZHg/Hp and q. Without vertical gravity, the only length scale in the problem is ηr = qHg, thus D ∝ q2. If one assumes D ∝ ǫα, we obtain by generalizing the toy model in BS10 (see their equation (16) and (17)) Hp ∝ Z α/(α+2)q2/(α+2) . (2) Since one expects α < 0 for relatively large ǫ & 1, we see that Hp not only depends sensitively on Z, as shown in BS10, it depends even more sensitively on q. This critical dependence makes the average particle to gas mass ratio ǫ at midplane quickly increases as q decreases, promoting strong particle clumping, which explains the trend in Figure 2. The more sensitive – 5 – τmax 10−1 10−1 1 1 Table 1: Run parameters. Run q R41 R21 R30 R10 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.025 0.05 0.1 0.025 0.05 0.1 10−2 10−4 100Z τmin 1..3 1..5 1..7 1..3 1..4 1..7 1..3 1..3 1..7 1..3 1..3 1..6 10−3 10−1 1 Nx × Nz 2 Lx × Lz 0.05 × 0.15 0.1 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.4 0.05 × 0.15 0.1 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.4 0.2 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.3 0.2 × 0.3 256 × 768 256 × 768 256 × 512 256 × 768 256 × 768 256 × 512 256 × 512 256 × 384 256 × 384 256 × 512 256 × 384 256 × 384 1 Domain size, in unit of gas scale height Hg = cs/Ω. 2 Grid resolution. q=0.025 q=0.05 q=0.1 ρ / g x a m , p ρ 103 102 101 100 0 200 400 t (Ω−1) 600 800 0 200 600 400 t (Ω−1) 800 0 200 400 t (Ω−1) 600 800 τ min =10−3 τ max =1 Z=0.01 Z=0.02 Z=0.03 Z=0.04 Z=0.05 Z=0.06 Z=0.07 Fig. 1.- Time history of the maximum particle density in simulations with a range of particle sizes from τs = 10−3 to one (runs R30). Left, middle and right panels show the results from q = 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 respectively. Runs with different solid abundance Z are labeled with different colors. – 6 – dependence of Zcrit on q for smaller particles can be interpreted as a result of the power-law index α tending to be more negative for smaller τs. Our 2D simulations do not contain the azimuthal dimension, which suppresses KHI. Nevertheless, we can check whether KHI would occur before particles settle into a sufficiently thin layer to trigger strong SI by plotting the vertical profile of the Richardson number for simulations at critical solid abundance for all q values, see Figure 3. The Richardson number is calculated by the method described in §3.1 of BS10. Although the Richardson number alone does not determine the stability when Coriolis force (G´omez & Ostriker 2005), and radial shear (Barranco 2009) are present, one may still take Ricrit = 0.1 as an approximation for the critical value for instability (Chiang 2008; Lee et al. 2010). We see in Figure 3 that for most of these runs, the Richardson number across the disk is above the critical value, meaning that the system is KH stable at Zcrit. Moreover, as q increases, the Richardson number at Zcrit decreases. In particular, for R30 and R10 runs with q = 0.1, the Richardson number at the disk midplane drops below 0.1, which may be subject to KHI. Therefore, the condition for strong clumping for these runs may be more stringent than shown in Figure 2. 4. Discussions and Conclusions In this letter, we have demonstrated that a small RPG strongly favors particle clumping and planetesimal formation via three effects. First, for a fixed particle size distribution, the critical solid abundance Zcrit above which strong clumping occurs is reduced. Second, at fixed solid abundance, strong clumping occurs for smaller particles. Third, KHI is less likely to be triggered (and therefore will not suppress particle clumping) at Z = Zcrit. Moreover, a smaller RPG also implies smaller radial drift and collision velocities, promoting grain growth, strengthening our second point above. A small RPG also favors the GI scenario of planetesimal formation (relevant when all particles are strongly coupled to the gas) because there is less free energy available in the vertical shear 2. One caveat from our 2D simulations is that the condition for particle clumping is slightly more stringent in 3D than in 2D (BS10). Therefore, the values of Zcrit obtained in this letter may be considered as a lower bound. Nevertheless, the conclusions in this letter are robust. In fact, Johansen et al. (2007, see their supplemental material) also found that planetesimal formation is eased with smaller pressure gradient using 3D simulations. Combined with the results in BS10, we have shown that strong particle clumping is favored when there is: 1) a small RPG; 2) large solid abundance; 3) large solid size; and 4) a dead zone. These results indicate that planetesimals preferentially form in specific locations in PPDs. The global structure and evolution of PPDs is of crucial importance: it deter- mines the RPG profile, the radial transport of particles which leads to enhancement of solid 2We expect the threshold abundance for GI to operate is larger than Zcrit. – 7 – R41: τ s =10−4−10−1 R21: τ s =10−2−10−1 R30: τ s =10−3−1 R10: τ s =10−1−1 q=0.025 q=0.05 q=0.1 q=0.025 q=0.05 q=0.1 104 103 102 101 g ρ / x a m p , ρ 0 0.02 0.04 Z 0.06 0 0.02 0.04 Z 0.06 0 0.02 0.04 Z 0.06 0 0.02 0.04 Z 0.06 0.08 Fig. 2.- The maximum particle density that can be achieved by SI from all our simulation runs (for R41, R21, R30, R10 from left to right panels). In each panel, we plot the maximum particle density as a function of solid abundance Z for each value of q (black solid, blue dashed and red dash-dotted for q = 0.025, 0.5 and 0.1 respectively). The dotted line at ρp,max = 500ρg indicates the adopted threshold for strong particle clumping, and we use larger symbols to indicate the first runs that show strong clumping as Z increases. R41: τ s=10−4−10−1 R21: τ s=10−2−10−1 R30: τ s=10−3−1 R10: τ s=10−1−1 101 100 i R 10−1 q=0.025 q=0.05 q=0.1 −0.04 −0.02 0 z 0.02 0.04 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 0.04 −0.04 −0.02 0 z 0.02 0.04 −0.04 −0.02 0 z 0.02 0.04 0 z Fig. 3.- The Richardson number profile for all simulation runs (for R41, R21, R30, R10 from left to right panels) with solid abundance just above Zcrit (the runs with enlarged symbols in Figure 2). Results from q = 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 are shown in black solid, blue dashed and red dash-dotted curves respectively. The dotted line indicated an approximate estimate of the critical Richardson number Ricrit = 0.1. – 8 – abundance in the inner disk (Youdin & Shu 2002), and grain coagulation that determines the particle size distribution. Recent models on the structure and evolution of PPDs (e.g., Jin & Sui 2010; Zhu et al. 2010) generally show much more complicated structures than the simple MMSN or α-disk models due to non-steady state accretion as well as the presence of dead zones. In addition, RPG may reach zero in local pressure bumps at the snow line (Kretke & Lin 2007) or the inner edge of the dead zone (Dzyurkevich et al. 2010) which can also be the preferred site for planetesimal formation. These results all-together provide useful constraints on the initial conditions for the formation of planet embryos and planets (Kokubo & Ida 2000, 2002). We are grateful to D.N.C. Lin for helpful discussions. This work is supported by NSF grant AST-0908269. XNB acknowledges support from NASA Earth and Space Science Fel- lowship. REFERENCES Bai, X.-N. & Goodman, J. 2009, ApJ, 701, 737 Bai, X.-N. & Stone, J. 2010a, ApJ, submitted -. ApJ, 2010b, submitted Barranco, J. A. 2009, ApJ, 691, 907 Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Blum, J. & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21 Chiang, E. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1549 Chiang, E. & Youdin, A. 2009, ArXiv e-prints Dzyurkevich, N., Flock, M., Turner, N. J., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Gammie, C. F. 1996, ApJ, 457, 355 Goldreich, P. & Ward, W. R. 1973, ApJ, 183, 1051 G´omez, G. C. & Ostriker, E. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 1093 Goodman, J. & Pindor, B. 2000, Icarus, 148, 537 Guttler, C., Blum, J., Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, ArXiv e-prints Jin, L. & Sui, N. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1179 Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Low, M.-M. M., Klahr, H., Henning, T., & Youdin, A. 2007, – 9 – Nature, 448, 1022 Johansen, A. & Youdin, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 627 Johansen, A., Youdin, A., & Mac Low, M. 2009, ApJ, 704, L75 Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. 2000, Icarus, 143, 15 -. 2002, ApJ, 581, 666 Kretke, K. A. & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, ApJ, 664, L55 Lee, A. T., Chiang, E., Asay-Davis, X., & Barranco, J. A. 2010, ApJ, in preparation Lommen, D. J. P., van Dishoeck, E. F., Wright, C. M., Maddison, S. T., Min, M., Wilner, D. J., Salter, D. M., van Langevelde, H. J., Bourke, T. L., van der Burg, R. F. J., & Blake, G. A. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., & Levison, H. F. 2009, Icarus, 204, 558 Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., & Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375 Natta, A., Testi, L., Calvet, N., Henning, T., Waters, R., & Wilner, D. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 767–781 Rodmann, J., Henning, T., Chandler, C. J., Mundy, L. G., & Wilner, D. J. 2006, A&A, 446, 211 Safronov, V. S. 1969, Evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and formation of the earth and the planets (Moscow: Nauka Press. Trans. NASA TTF 677, 1972) Sekiya, M. 1998, Icarus, 133, 298 Stone, J. M., Gammie, C. F., Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A.P., Russell, S.S., (Tucson, U. Arizona Press), p589 Stone, J. M., Gardiner, T. A., Teuben, P., Hawley, J. F., & Simon, J. B. 2008, ApJS, 178, 137 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 -. 1980, Icarus, 44, 172 Wilner, D. J., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Claussen, M. J., & Hartmann, L. 2005, ApJ, 626, L109 Youdin, A. N. & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin, A. N. & Shu, F. H. 2002, ApJ, 580, 494 – 10 – Zhu, Z., Hartmann, L., & Gammie, C. 2010, ApJ, 713, 1143 Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., Guettler, C., Blum, J., & Dullemond, C. P. 2010, ArXiv e-prints This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1312.2147	1	1312	2013-12-07T22:13:08	How the presence of a gas giant affects the formation of mean-motion resonances between two low-mass planets in a locally isothermal gaseous disc	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	In this paper we investigate the possibility of a migration-induced resonance locking in systems containing three planets, namely an Earth analog, a super-Earth and a gas giant. The planets have been listed in order of increasing orbital periods. All three bodies are embedded in a locally isothermal gaseous disc and orbit around a solar mass star. We are interested in answering the following question: Will the low-mass planets form the same resonant structures with each other in the vicinity of the gas giant as in the case when the gas giant is absent? When there is no gas giant in the system, it has been already shown that if the two low-mass planets undergo a convergent differential migration, they will capture each other in a mean-motion resonance. For the choices of disc parameters and planet masses made in this paper, the formation of the 5:4 resonance in the absence of the Jupiter has been observed. In this work we add a gas giant on the most external orbit of the system in such a way that its differential migration is convergent with the low-mass planets. We show that the result of this set-up is the speeding up of the migration of the super-Earth and, after that, all three planets become locked in a triple mean-motion resonance. However, this resonance is not maintained due to the low-mass planet eccentricity excitation, a fact that leads to close encounters between planets and eventually to the ejection from the internal orbits of one or both low-mass planets.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1 -- 10 () Printed 7 February 2021 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) How the presence of a gas giant affects the formation of mean-motion resonances between two low-mass planets in a locally isothermal gaseous disc E. Podlewska-Gaca⋆ and E. Szuszkiewicz† Institute of Physics and CASA, University of Szczecin, ul. Wielkopolska 15, 70-451 Szczecin, Poland ABSTRACT In this paper we investigate the possibility of a migration-induced resonance locking in systems containing three planets, namely an Earth analog (1M⊕), a super-Earth (4M⊕) and a gas giant (one Jupiter mass). The planets have been listed in order of increasing orbital periods. All three bodies are embedded in a locally isothermal gaseous disc and orbit around a solar mass star. We are interested in answering the following questions: Will the low-mass planets form the same resonant structures with each other in the vicinity of the gas giant as in the case when the gas giant is absent? More in general, how will the presence of the gas giant affect the evolution of the two low-mass planets? When there is no gas giant in the system, it has been already shown that if the two low-mass planets undergo a convergent differential migration, they will capture each other in a mean-motion resonance. For the choices of disc parameters and planet masses made in this paper, the formation of the 5:4 resonance in the absence of the Jupiter has been observed in a previous investigation and confirmed here. In this work we add a gas giant on the most external orbit of the system in such a way that its differential migration is convergent with the low-mass planets. We show that the result of this set-up is the speeding up of the migration of the super-Earth and, after that, all three planets become locked in a triple mean-motion resonance. However, this resonance is not maintained due to the low-mass planet eccentricity excitation, a fact that leads to close encounters between planets and eventually to the ejection from the internal orbits of one or both low-mass planets. We have observed that the ejected low-mass planets can leave the system, fall into a star or become the external planet relative to the gas giant. In our simulations the latter situation has been observed for the super-Earth. It follows from the results presented here that the presence of a Jupiter-like planet might have a strong influence on the architecture of planetary systems. Moreover, the planet ejections due to the gas giant action may lead to the formation of a population of low-mass freely floating planets. Key words: methods: numerical - planets and satellites: formation 1 INTRODUCTION The rapid progress in instrumentation, observational tech- niques and strategies has provided an enormous amount of data, which has been used for intensive planet searches. The rate of planetary system discoveries is impressive: After 20 years of observations, we know already over 1000 con- firmed planets and a few thousand of planet candidates (Borucki et al., 2011; Batalha et al. 2013). An even more compelling motivation for the research presented here is the growing evidence that multi-planet systems are the rule ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] (EP) † E-mail: [email protected] (ES) c(cid:13) RAS rather than the exception. The number of such systems at the time of writing this paper has reached over 170. In some of them the planetary orbits remain in mean-motion com- mensurabilities (e.g. Lissauer et al., 2011b; Steffen et al., 2012; Fabrycky et al., 2012; Steffen et al., 2013). For exam- ple, the authors of the recent paper (Steffen et al., 2013) have reported that in all thirteen systems confirmed by their investigations there are planets near one of the first order mean-motion resonances. More precisely, they have found pairs of planets near the 2:1, 3:2, 4:3, 5:4 and 6:5 commensurabilities. There is a strong indication that in some of those systems there could be multiple pairs of planets near first order mean-motion resonances which might form triple resonances. This seems to be the case of 2 E. Podlewska-Gaca and E. Szuszkiewicz Kepler-53 (4:2:1) or Kepler-60 (20:15:12). The importance of 3-body resonances has been recently discussed also by Migaszewski et al., (2012) in the context of the dynamics of Kepler-11. All the planets involved in the mean-motion commensurabilities mentioned above are super-Earths with masses in the range of 3 - 10 M⊕. This suggests that com- plex multiple resonant structures might form in systems with low-mass planets only. Systems of this kind are probably not rare, because preliminary results of the Kepler mission seem to confirm the expectations that low-mass planets are numerous (Ida & Lin, 2005). The case of two resonant low- mass planets migrating in a gaseous protoplanetary disc has been studied in details by Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005, 2010). Their main finding is that, once convergent migra- tion takes place, it is very likely that the planets end up in one of the mean-motion commensurabilities, whose type is critically dependent on the migration rate. In the most com- monly realized resonances the values of p appearing in the period ratio (p + 1) : p are greater when the planet masses are disparate than when they are equal. This is a straight- forward consequence of the difference in the migration rates. In fact, the differential migration of equal mass planets in the Earth mass range is slower than that of disparate mass planets. An analytic criterion for the occurrence and main- tenance of resonances between low-mass planets has been provided in Papaloizou and Szuszkiewicz (2010). However, it is licit to expect that most systems will contain not only low-mass planets, but also more massive planets like gas giants. For this reason, the aim of this pa- per is to investigate the behaviour of pairs of planets with masses in the Earth mass range, similar to those considered in Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005), when there is in the system an additional, more massive planet. In other words, we ask ourselves how the presence of a giant planet can in- fluence the dynamics of a system containing two low-mass planetary companions. The continuous flow of observational information about the dynamics and structure of such sys- tems offers a strong motivation for our investigations on the characteristics of the planetary configurations formed dur- ing the early stages of the evolution with particular attention given to resonant configurations. The situation is more complex if we have more than two planets, as it was shown for example by Marzari et al., (2010) or Moeckel and Armitage (2012) for a three giant planet system. In the case of a system with three planets we can observe indeed a variety of dynamical behaviours, such as planet merging, orbital exchange or scattering of the plan- ets. We study first the evolution of a system containing only two low-mass planets embedded in a gaseous protoplanetary disc. Then, we add a Jupiter-like gas giant on the external orbit relatively to both low-mass planets and compare the evolution of the low-mass planets before and after this ad- dition. We choose to put a gas giant on the external orbit in order to create an environment favourable for the formation of the commensurabilities between the super-Earth and the gas giant (Podlewska & Szuszkiewicz, 2008). It is very diffi- cult to get a resonance capture in the opposite configuration (Podlewska & Szuszkiewicz, 2009; Podlewska et al., 2012). We expect that the evolution of the system might be strongly dependent on the migration rate of the giant planet, so we perform our simulations in discs with different vis- cosities, changing in this way the migration speed of the gas giant. As it is shown by the simulations, it turns out that also the migration of low-mass planets can be affected by the viscosity of the disc. A similar effect has been already observed by Masset et al., (2006). They have explained it by non-linearities of the flow around a low-mass planet that can cause an additional torque from the co-orbital region which might slow down its migration rate. We find that in the locally isothermal discs the following sequence of events occurs during the evolution of a three- planet system consisting initially of two low-mass planets (an Earth analog and a super-Earth with the mass of four Earth masses) and a gas giant (with the mass of Jupiter): The system evolves first into an unstable triple resonance, followed by the ejection of one or both low-mass planets. Therefore, the two most frequent outcomes of the system evolution are that the gas giant remains the most inter- nal planet or one of the low-mass planets stays in resonant configuration with the gas giant. If similar conditions are common among the observed young planetary systems, the planets ejected during the evolution of such systems might form a population of planets freely floating in the space. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we de- scribe the methodology followed in the numerical simula- tions, while in Section 3 we present the behaviour of a sys- tem with two low-mass planets, showing how the viscosity affects their evolution. The results of the simulations with a gas giant with two low-mass companions are discussed in Section 4 and partly also in Section 5, where our conclusions are also drawn. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS We have performed full 2D numerical simulations of planets embedded in a gaseous protoplanetary disc using the hy- drodynamical code NIRVANA. For details on the numerical scheme employed in the code see Nelson et al., (2000). We use polar coordinates (r, φ) with the origin located at the position of the central star. In our simulations the mass unit is the mass of the cen- tral star. The initial semi-major axis of the super-Earth de- fines the unit of length. The unit of time is the orbital period of the initial orbit of the super-Earth divided by 2π. In these units, the gravitational constant G = 1. With the above settings, our computational domain extends from 0.33 to 5 and it is divided uniformly into 489 and 512 grid cells in the radial and azimuthal directions respectively. The radial res- olution of the grid is therefore δr = 9.6 × 10−3 = 0.192H/r, where H is the semi-thickness of the disc. This means that, before the low-mass planet motion becomes dominated by the presence of the gas giant in the disc, i.e. when r > 0.78, H is resolved by no less than 4 grid cells at the planet lo- cations. Instead, the width of the horseshoe region is cov- ered just by one grid cell, which indicates that the coro- tation torque is poorly resolved. However, this should not affect our results, because we expect the corotation torque to saturate under the conditions adopted in this study (see Section 5). The resolution of our grid is a compromise be- tween making the size of the disc appropriate for modelling our three-planet system and being able to follow the evo- lution of planets for a sufficiently long period of time. In c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Two low-mass planets in the presence of a gas giant 3 order to strengthen the validity of our results, we have ver- ified that the final outcome of our simulations does not change if we double the resolution in each direction (978 and 1024 grid cells in the radial and azimuthal directions respectively). We choose open radial boundary conditions, so that the material in the disc can outflow through the boundaries of the computational domain according to the viscous evolution of the disc. The disc has constant aspect ratio h = H/r = 0.05 and uniformly distributed surface density Σ0 = 6 × 10−4. This value of Σ0 corresponds to the minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN) around 5.2 AU if one takes the length unit equal to 5.2 AU and the mass unit equal to the solar mass. We use the locally isother- mal equation of state and do not take into account the disc self-gravity. Those assumptions have been made in the pre- vious paper (Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, 2005), which is the starting point for the present study. This is why we have not employed here a more realistic equation of state and the disc self-gravity has been neglected. The gravitational potential is softened with softening parameter ε = 0.8H and we do not exclude any material within the Hill sphere. Crida et al., (2009) argue that the material inside the Hill sphere should be very carefully taken into account in numerical simula- tions when the self-gravity of the gas is neglected. How this should be realized in a proper way is still a subject of inten- sive research. However, to take fully into account self-gravity is not essential for the purpose of this study. We have rather concentrated on the influence of the relative migration rate which has been tuned by the choice of different values of the viscosity. Finally, to close the list of assumptions, the plan- ets do not accrete matter from the disc. In all simulations in which there is a gas giant in the system, all planets are kept on fixed orbits until the giant planet opens a deep gap in the disc and only after that time they are allowed to migrate. In the simulations presented here the central star has a Solar mass, so the masses of the planets are respectively mE = 1M⊕, mSE = 4M⊕ and mJ = 1MJ , where M⊕ is the Earth mass and MJ is the Jupiter mass. The planet with mass mE = 1M⊕ (called hereafter "the Earth ana- log" or "the Earth-like planet") is located initially on the innermost circular orbit at the distance rE = 0.83. Another planet with the mass mSE = 4M⊕ (which will be called "the super-Earth") is located initially at rSE = 1.0, also on the circular orbit. This configuration of the low-mass planets is similar to the one described in Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005). With respect to Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005), in the present work the kinematic viscosity ν is introduced and the effects of the addition of a gas giant with the mass of Jupiter in the system are investigated. We have initially placed the gas giant at rJ = 1.62, which enables the forma- tion of any of the first order mean-motion resonances. Then, we have moved its location to rJ = 1.35 and rJ = 1.28. The kinematic viscosity is changed from simulation to simulation and can take the values ν = 0, 2 · 10−6, 6 · 10−6 and 10−5 ex- pressed in our units. The motion of the planets is calculated using a standard leapfrog integrator. c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 ♠ ❙❊ ♠ ❊ r ❊ r ❙❊ Figure 1. The initial set up for numerical simulations in the case of two low-mass planets embedded in a protoplanetary disc. 3 THE EVOLUTION OF A SYSTEM WITH TWO LOW-MASS PLANETS First of all, we investigate the behaviour of a system con- taining two low-mass planets embedded in a gaseous proto- planetary disc. This will be a useful reference for comparison with the full three-planet system that is the main goal of this study. The initial set up for our simulations is illustrated in Fig. 1. Before adding a gas giant to the system, we check the dependence of the planet migration rate on the value of the kinematic viscosity of the disc. The values of ν range from 0 to 10−5, so that we can control the effects of the viscosity on the planet migration. This will allow us to perform in the next Section a series of simulations with different migration speeds of the gas giant while retaining full control of possi- ble changes caused by the viscosity in the low-mass planet migration. The migration rates of the two low-mass planets in discs with four different values of viscosity are shown in Fig. 2 separately for the Earth analog and the super-Earth before the two planets start to interact strongly with each other. The left panel presents the migration rate of the inner planet with mass of 1M⊕. We can see that for lower viscos- ity the migration is faster. In the right panel of Fig. 2 we plot the migration rates of the outer planet with the mass of 4M⊕. For both planets the migration rate changes with the viscosity in a similar quantitative way, but the migration of the super-Earth is affected by the viscosity much stronger than that of the less massive planet. The lowest black line appearing in the left panel and that in the right panel de- note the migration rates of the planets with masses 1M⊕ and 4M⊕ respectively calculated according to well known 3D prescription of the type I migration given by equation (70) in Tanaka et al. (2002). However, recent developments in the calculations of the torque acting on low-mass plan- ets (Paardekooper & Mellema (2006); Baruteau & Masset (2008); Kley & Crida (2008); Paardekooper et al. (2010, 2011)) have revealed that the speed and even the direction of the migration can be changed if we take into account a more refined treatment of the disc structure. According to Paardekooper et al. (2010), for the locally isothermal ap- proximation which we use here, we expect to have a slower migration rate than those described in Tanaka et al. (2002). This is illustrated in Fig. 2, where the upper black lines denote the migration rates obtained for locally isothermal 4 E. Podlewska-Gaca and E. Szuszkiewicz Figure 2. The migration rates of planets with the masses 1M⊕ (left panel) and 4M⊕ (right panel) in the discs with four different kinematic viscosities. The gray curves denote the results for ν = 10−5, 6 · 10−6, 2 · 10−6 and 0 from top to bottom respectively. The upper and lower black lines denote the migration rates calculated according to Paardekooper et al. (2010) (equation (49) in their paper) and Tanaka et al. (2002) (equation (70) in their paper) respectively. Figure 3. The left panel present the semi-major axis ratios of the planets embedded in a disc with the kinematic viscosities 0 (gray colour) and 2 · 10−6 (black colour). The right panel shows the semi-major axis ratios of the planets embedded in the disc with the viscosities 6 · 10−6 (gray colour) and ν = 10−5 (black colour) where the differential migration is so slow that planets attain the 5:4 resonance after a longer evolution time. discs according to the formula (49) of Paardekooper et al. (2010). Our simulations fits better to the upper black lines obtained after Paardekooper et al. (2010) than to the lower ones by Tanaka et al. (2002). Despite the differences in the migration rates due to the disc viscosity, in all our simu- lations the planets are captured eventually in the 5:4 res- onance. To illustrate this, in Fig. 3 we have plotted the evolution of the semi-major axis ratios of the two low-mass planets in discs with four different values of the viscosity. The results of our simulations are presented in two sepa- rate panels, because the resonant capture occurs at different timescales. The resonance capture in the discs with the two lower values of the viscosity (ν = 0 and ν = 2 · 10−6) took place after 6000 and 11000 time units respectively, see left panel. In the discs with the higher values of the viscosity (ν = 6 · 10−6 and ν = 10−5) it occurred after 40000 and 50000 time units respectively, see right panel. Note that the same resonance (5:4) obtained here has been reported by Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005) for planets embedded in an inviscid disc with the same surface density as in our sim- ulations. In Fig. 3 (right panel) one can observe another interesting phenomenon, namely the passage through one of Figure 4. The evolution of the eccentricities of the Earth-like planet in the disc with the viscosity 2 · 10−6 (gray colour) and 0 (black colour), respectively. the higher order resonances (most likely 9:7) in the case of viscosity ν = 10−5 (black curve) at around 2 ·104 time units. As soon as the capture in the mean-motion resonance c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Two low-mass planets in the presence of a gas giant 5 M mE mSE mJ rE rSE rJ Figure 5. The initial set up for the numerical simulations of the two low-mass planets and a gas giant embedded in a protoplane- tary disc. occurs, the eccentricities of the planets increase. Assum- ing that the eccentricity of the super-Earth eSE is neg- ligible, which is true for our simulations (eSE ≈ 0.007), Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, (2005) gave an analytic pre- scription for the final value of the eccentricity of the inner planet eE in the inviscid disc eE 2 = (cid:18) mSE − 1(cid:19) × aE (cid:17)1/2 mE (cid:16) aSE 0.578(p + 1)(mE + mSE) (cid:16) H r (cid:17) mE 2 , (1) where p is an integer. According to this estimate, the eccen- tricity should reach 0.048 in the 5:4 resonance (p=4), which is in very good agreement with the eccentricity of the Earth- like planet in an inviscid disc shown in black colour in Fig. 4. As mentioned previously, if the viscosity in the disc is higher, the migration of low-mass planets is slower. Thus, also the eccentricity should reach lower values in discs with higher viscosity, as it is indeed observed in our simulations. For example, in Fig. 4 it is shown (gray colour line) the evo- lution of the eccentricity of the Earth-like planet in the disc with viscosity 2 · 10−6. A similar correlation between the mi- gration rate and the eccentricity evolution was observed in Crida et al., (2008) for systems of two giant planets. 4 THE EVOLUTION OF TWO LOW-MASS PLANETS IN THE PRESENCE OF A GAS GIANT In the previous Section we have presented the most likely resonant configuration for a two low-mass planet system: an Earth analog and a super-Earth embedded in a locally isothermal gaseous disc with the properties described in Sec- tion 2. Here, we show how the presence of a gas giant can influence the evolution of such a system. The giant planet is located initially on the external orbit (see Fig. 5) outside any first order mean-motion resonance and migrates with speed determined by the viscosity of the disc. In our sim- ulations we consider two values of ν, namely 2 · 10−6 and 10−5. Fig. 6 shows how the gas giant modifies the migration rate of the super-Earth. The left panel of that Figure dis- plays how the semi-major axes of the planets' orbits evolve c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 in a disc with viscosity 2 · 10−6. The same information, but for a disc with ν = 10−5, is presented in the right panel. The initial evolution of the semi-major axes of the two low- mass planets in the presence of the gas giant (gray colour) is compared with the situation in which there is no massive planet in the system (black colour). The presence of the gas giant in the system makes the migration of the 4M⊕ planet faster than before. This results in turn in a faster differential migration of the two low-mass companions. The relatively slow migration of the gas giant, which occurs in the disc with ν = 2 ·10−6, causes the low-mass planets to pass through the 5:4 mean-motion commensurability without being captured in it. They proceed instead to another first order commen- surability, namely the 6:5. In the disc with higher viscosity (ν = 10−5), the Jupiter migrates very fast and this leads to the 1:1 resonant locking between the super-Earth and the Earth analog. In the left and right panel of Fig. 7 we plot the evolution of the semi-major axis ratios of the planets in the discs with the kinematic viscosities 2 ·10−6 and ν = 10−5 respectively. The aim of these plots is to show what will be the final outcome of the evolution of the two systems de- scribed above: Will the 6:5 resonance actually take place and will the 1:1 resonance configuration survive during fur- ther migration? Let us start from the case in which the two low-mass planets are approaching the 6:5 resonance, i. e. when they are embedded in a disc with viscosity ν = 2 · 10−6. At the beginning of the simulations, the gas giant is placed very close to the 2:1 resonance with the super-Earth. For the first several hundred time units of its evolution, the differential migration of these two planets is convergent. There is a sign of the excitation of the super-Earth eccentricity, which is clearly seen in Fig. 8 (left panel) and which is due to the vicinity of the 2:1 resonance. However, the capture into the 2:1 commensurability did not take place at this early stage, because, after the short period of the convergent migration, the planets have migrated divergently for several hundreds of time units. Only after that time the process of the for- mation of the 2:1 resonance started and we have to wait for its completion for almost 40000 time units. The low-mass planets have reached a position close to the resonance after approximately 6000 time units. This is revealed by the li- bration of the resonance angle φ = 6λSE − 5λE − ωE around a fixed value. Here λSE and λE denote the mean longitudes of the super-Earth (SE) and the Earth analog (E) respec- tively, while ωE is the longitude of the pericentre of the Earth analog. Initially the libration amplitude is large (170 degrees), but by the time of 20000 time units it decreases to 50 degrees and after 35000 time units is around 25 de- grees, as it can be seen from Fig. 9. The appearance of the resonant angle defined above is not associated with a sig- nificant increase in the eccentricities of the planets' orbits. The signature of the 6:5 resonance is present also in the behaviour of the angle between the apsidal lines, shown in Fig. 10 (left panel). In this way, the system has attained the configuration in which the Jupiter and the super-Earth are locked in the 2:1 commensurability and, in addition, the super-Earth and the Earth analog are locked in the 6:5 com- mensurability. This means that the resonant configuration is established also between the Jupiter and the Earth-like planet. Their period ratio equals 12:5. Thus, the three plan- ets in the system are locked in the triple 12:6:5 mean-motion 6 E. Podlewska-Gaca and E. Szuszkiewicz Figure 6. The comparison of the evolution of semi-major axes of low-mass planets in the presence of the gas giant (gray colour) and for the system without the Jupiter (black colour). The left and right panels show the evolution of low-mass planet in the discs with the kinematic viscosities ν = 2 · 10−6 and 10−5 respectively. The location of the Jupiter-like planet is not shown in these figures. The upper pair of lines refers to the semi-major axis of the super-Earth, the lower one to that of the Earth-like planet. Figure 7. The evolution of the semi-major axis ratios of the planets embedded in the discs with the kinematic viscosities ν = 2 · 10−6 (left panel) and ν = 10−5 (right panel). The horizontal lines denote the exact position of the resonance. resonance. The illustration of this statement is presented in Fig. 10. However, such resonant configuration is not main- tained during the further evolution. Soon after the capture in the triple resonance, the orbits of both low-mass planets become chaotic (see Fig. 7, left panel, the uppermost and lowest lines almost at the end of the displayed period of the evolution) and the super-Earth is shifted on the most external orbit. On the other hand, in the disc with viscosity 10−5 the gas giant first captures the super-Earth in the 2:1 commen- surability and then the super-Earth captures the Earth-like planet into the 1:1 commensurability. As a consequence, the three planets form the triple 2:1:1 resonant configuration which, however, does not survive during the further evolu- tion. The lightest planet is ejected from the system after roughly 9000 time units, see Fig. 7, right panel, lower line. Despite the scattering occurring in the system, the gas giant and the super-Earth remain locked in the commensurability till the end of the simulation (see Fig. 10). The capture in the 1:1 resonance has already been observed in a variety of numerical studies, see e.g. Thommes (2005), Beauge et al. (2007), Crida (2009), Cresswell & Nelson (2008, 2009), Podlewska-Gaca & Szuszkiewicz, (2011). Here we would like to take a closer look at the type of motion of the two low- mass planets in the co-orbital configuration induced by the vicinity of a migrating gas giant and affected by interaction of the 2:1 resonance. In Fig. 11 we present the evolution of the orbits of the two co-orbital planets and the resonance an- gle, which for the 1:1 commensurability is just equal to the difference between the mean longitudes of the planets. The amplitude of libration of the resonance angle is very large, which makes difficult to determine the type of the planet mo- tion. During the first part of the co-orbital evolution, after a very short transient event (close encounter), which took place at about 2300 time units, the planets gradually set- tled down on mutual horseshoe orbits. The resonant angle librates roughly around 180 degrees and the relative varia- tion of the semi-major axis of the Earth-like planet is large. At around 5000 time units the situation has changed. The amplitude of the semi-major axis of the Earth-like planet has decreased significantly and a value around which the resonant angle librates decreases slowly in time, reaching towards the end of our simulations (between 7000 and 7800 time units) the value about 60 degrees. This could be an in- dication that at this stage of the evolution the planets move on the tadpole orbits. Finally, at around 9000 time units, c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Two low-mass planets in the presence of a gas giant 7 Figure 8. The evolution of the eccentricities of the Earth-like planet (gray curve) and the super-Earth (black curve) in the disc with the viscosities 2 · 10−6 (left panel) and 10−5 (right panel). the Earth-like planet is ejected from the system, falling into the star. The fact that triple resonances are not maintained might be a consequence of the eccentricity excitation of the low-mass planet orbits. Indeed, after the capture in the 2:1 resonance, the eccentricities of both low-mass planets in- crease significantly. For the disc with viscosity 2 · 10−6, the eccentricity of the Earth-like planet reaches 0.12 and that of the super-Earth approaches 0.45. In the case of the disc with higher viscosity (ν = 10−5), the eccentricities increase to even higher values, namely 0.55 and 0.8 for the Earth ana- log and the super-Earth respectively. The motion on such highly eccentric orbits may lead to the chaotic behaviour in the system which is observed in our simulations and may be related to the disappearance of the triple resonances. Thus, we argue that, under the mutual conditions dis- cussed in this Section, in systems containing a gas giant and two low-mass planetary companions, the capture in the triple resonance due to convergent migration can be very common at the early stages of the evolution. However, the final configuration of such systems consists of a gas giant and only one low-mass planet on the internal orbit. The sec- ond low-mass planet is moved from the internal orbit onto the external one or is entirely ejected from the system due to the eccentricity excitation of the planetary orbits. 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS In Section 4 we have considered the situation in which the gas giant is located initially outside any first order mean- motion resonance, namely at the distance rJ = 1.62. Now, we discuss the possible final architectures for a few other ini- tial locations of the Jupiter-like planet, assuming that such configurations were formed in the previous stages of the evo- lution of the planetary systems. First, we place the gas giant at the distance rJ = 1.35. If the viscosity of the disc is low (2 · 10−6), the most in- ner planet moves on a chaotic orbit since the beginning of the simulation. Meanwhile, the Jupiter and the super-Earth approach the 3:2 commensurability. The eccentricity of the super-Earth increases only to about 0.1, which is lower than what was observed for this resonance in our previous sim- ulations (Podlewska & Szuszkiewicz, 2008). Moreover, the c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Figure 9. The evolution of the 6:5 resonance angle for the Earth- like planet and the super-Earth embedded in the disc with the viscosity 2 · 10−6, migrating in the vicinity of the Jupiter-like planet. angle between the apsidal lines oscillates in the whole range from 0 to 2π. Finally, after 16000 time units both low-mass planets are scattered from the disc. If instead the viscosity of the disc is high (ν = 10−5), the convergent migration leads to the temporary capture in the triple 4:3:2 mean-motion resonance. During the evolution of such configuration, the eccentricities of the low-mass planets increase and, as a re- sult, the Earth analog is ejected from the system. This event has a big effect on the system, because the commensurabil- ity between the Jupiter and the super-Earth is destroyed. Soon after this happens, also the second low-mass planet is scattered from the disc. The final result in both cases, re- gardless of the value of the viscosity, is just a single gas giant orbiting the star. In the next simulation, the gas giant is placed initially even closer than before, i.e. at rJ = 1.28. In this case, we find that in the disc with low viscosity (ν = 2 · 10−6), the Jupiter captures the super-Earth into the 3:2 resonance. Then, the Earth-like planet is ejected from the system and the resonant structure between the gas giant and the super-Earth is lost. However, during the further evolution of the system, the convergent migration brings the super-Earth and the gas giant back into that commensurability. 8 E. Podlewska-Gaca and E. Szuszkiewicz Figure 10. Left panel: The evolution of the angles between apsidal lines of the Earth-like planet and the super-Earth (top panel), the Earth-like planet and the gas giant (middle panel), and the super-Earth and the gas giant (bottom panel) in the disc with the viscosity 2 · 10−6. Right panel: The same as in left panel but for the disc with the viscosity 10−5. In the disc with viscosity 10−5, the super-Earth is scat- tered into the most external orbit at a distance close to r = 2 and slowly migrates towards the Jupiter. We expect that the super-Earth will stop to migrate just outside the 2:1 external resonance with the gas giant as it has been shown in Podlewska et al., (2012). The super-Earth still did not reach the predicted location at the time of the end of simulations. The Jupiter, instead, captures the Earth analog in the 2:1 resonance and this commensurability survives till the end of the simulation. Again, the final configuration consists of c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 Two low-mass planets in the presence of a gas giant 9 Figure 11. The evolution of the semi-major axes of the planets in the co-orbital motion (left panel) and the behaviour of the resonance angle (right panel). In the left panel, the gray dots refers to the semi-major axis of the super-Earth and the black ones to that of the Earth-like planet. the gas giant and only one low-mass planet on the internal orbit. Concluding, in Section 3 we have investigated systems of two planets with masses 1M⊕ and 4M⊕ embedded into a locally isothermal disc. It has already been demonstrated that for such systems, evolving in the inviscid disc, the capture into a first order mean-motion resonance is very likely if the relative migration of the planets is convergent (Papaloizou & Szuszkiewicz, 2005, 2010). We confirm here this result also for discs with viscosities in the range be- tween 0 and 10−5. In all our simulations the planets attain finally the 5:4 resonance, even if the path through which it occurs can be very different from one case to another. The main goal of this study was to investigate how the architecture of a system changes if it contains not only a pair of low-mass planets, but also a Jupiter mass gas gi- ant located on the most external orbit. Shall we expect to assist to the formation of a resonant configuration in such systems? Apart from those cases in which both or one low- mass planets are ejected from the system at the very early stages of the simulations, the most common configuration is a triple commensurability. However, in all our simulations this is just a transitional configuration. It never survives for a long time. Soon after the resonant locking, the eccentric- ity of both low-mass planets increases and close encounters between planets occur. Finally, the ejection of one or both low-mass planets from the internal orbits takes place. The most likely final scenarios of the evolution of the systems described in this paper, for given planetary masses and ini- tial planet locations, are that i) only the giant planet is left in the system or ii) a resonant pair of planets remains that can consist in one of the following: The gas giant and the super-Earth on the internal orbit or the gas giant and an Earth analog on the internal orbit. Within our simulations we have observed also cases in which a low-mass planet moves from the internal to the ex- ternal orbit due to the action of the Jupiter-like planet. In- terestingly enough, the low-mass planet is located close to the 2:1 resonance but not exactly in resonance. This might be a consequence of the interaction of the low-mass planet with the density waves excited by the gas giant described in details in Podlewska et al., (2012). To sum up, it is impor- c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10 tant to stress here that the variety of outcomes described above is mainly due to the action of the gas giant. Because of the presence of the Jupiter in the disc, in fact, the initial migration rates of the low-mass planets undergo very quickly an alteration. After that, the motion of the low-mass planets is dominated by the interaction with the gas giant and the waves excited by it in the disc. Our conclusions are concerning a system of three plan- ets embedded in a locally isothermal gaseous disc. One needs to be aware of all limitations these assumptions can bring. Let us present a straightforward argument, which will help to justify the use of the locally isothermal equation of state in our simulations. To this purpose, we have first evaluated the opacity of the disc at the initial location of the super- Earth, namely at r = 5.2 AU. Adopting the values of sur- face density, aspect ratio, and distance considered in our paper, we have found that the disc is optically thick at that position. Next, we have evaluated the migration rate from equations (50-53) in Paardekooper et al. (2011), which give the total torque acting on a low-mass planet consisting of the Lindblad torque plus the corotation torque. Finally, we have compared this migration rate with that obtained in the case of the locally isothermal limit using equation (49) in Paardekooper et al. (2010), getting an agreement between the two values within a few percents. This upshot confirms that we have studied here a particular case of the migra- tion rates of the planets where the corotation torque can be neglected, namely the planets, which move in an opti- cally thick disc well modelled by the locally isothermal ap- proximation. Other disc conditions may lead to other mi- gration rates (in particular for the terrestrial planets), see Bitsch et al. (2013). The most obvious extension of this work will be to move into a more realistic equation of state or ideally to use a self-consistent radiative model of the protoplanetary discs. This will allow us to understand how the low-mass plan- ets migrate in the given physical conditions occurring in the observed discs. Much work has already been done towards this aim (see for instance Paardekooper & Mellema (2006); Paardekooper & Papaloizou (2008); Kley & Crida (2008); Baruteau & Masset (2008); Bitsch et al. (2010, 2011a,b). So far, we know examples of systems in which low- 10 E. Podlewska-Gaca and E. Szuszkiewicz mass planets are close to the 5:4 commensurability (Kepler- 11, Lissauer et al., (2011a)) or form triple resonances or even multiple commensurabilities involving a 1:1 resonance (Lissauer et al., 2011b; Rivera et al., 2010). All these struc- tures are seen also in our numerical simulations at some stage of the evolution. On the other side, neither a super- Earth nor an Earth analog orbiting on the internal orbit rel- ative to a gas giant and locked with it in a mean-motion reso- nance have been detected yet. However, our simulations indi- cate that these configurations are quite likely to form at the early stages of the planetary system evolution. The increas- ing number of data (from the numerous planet searches) should shed more light on the existence of such configura- tions soon. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been partially supported by the MNiSW grant N203 026 32/3831 and the MNiSW PMN grant - ASTROSIM-PL "Computational Astrophysics. The forma- tion and evolution of structures in the universe: from planets to galaxies". The simulations reported here were performed using the HPC cluster "HAL9000" of the Faculty of Math- ematics and Physics at the University of Szczecin. We are grateful to Michał Różyczka for bringing this topic to our attention and Franco Ferrari for reading the manuscript and his continuous support in the development of our computa- tional techniques and computer facilities. Finally, we thank the referee for valuable comments which helped us in im- proving the manuscript. REFERENCES Baruteau, C., Masset, F., 2008, ApJ, 672, 1054 Batalha N. M., et al.,2013, ApJS, 204, 24 Beaugé, C., Sándor, Zs., Érdi, B.; Süli, Á., 2007, A&A, 463, 359 Bitsch, B. & Kley, W. 2010, A&A, 523, A30 Bitsch, B. & Kley, W. 2011, A&A, 530, A41 Bitsch, B. & Kley, W. 2011, A&A, 536, A77 Bitsch, B., Boley, A., Kley, W., 2013, A&A 550, A52 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G. and 63 coau- thors, 2011, ApJ 736 19 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/19 (arXiv:1102.0541) Cresswell, P., Nelson, R. P., 2008, A&A, 482, 677 Cresswell, P., Nelson, R. P., 2009, A&A, 493, 1141 Crida, A., Sándor, Z., Kley, W., 2008, A&A, 483, 325 Crida, A., 2009, ApJ, 698, 606 Crida, A., Baruteau, C., Kley, W., Masset, F. 2009, A&A, 502, 679 Fabrycky D. C. et al., 2012a, ApJ, 750, 114 Ida, S., Lin, D. N. C., 2005, ApJ, 626, 1045 Kley, W., Crida, A., 2008, A& A, 487, L9 Lissauer, J. J., Fabrycky, D. C. and 37 coauthors, 2011, Nature 470 53 Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C. and 22 coau- thors, 2011, ApJS 197 8 doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/8 (arXiv:1102.0543) Marzari, F.; Baruteau, C.; Scholl, H., 2010, A&AL, 514, L4 Masset, F. S.; D'Angelo, G.; Kley, W., 2006, ApJ, 652, 730 Migaszewski, C.; Słonina, M., Goździewski, K., 2012, MN- RAS, 247, 770 Moeckel, N., Armitage, P. J, 2012, MNRAS 419, 366 Mordasini, C.; Alibert, Y.; Benz, W., 2009, A&A, 501, 1139 Nelson R. P., Papaloizou J.C. B., Masset F., Kley W., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 18 Paardekooper, S.-J.; Mellema, G., 2006, A& A, 459, L17 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2008, A&A, 485, 877 Paardekooper, S.-J., Baruteau, C., Crida, A., Kley, W., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1950 Paardekooper, S.-J., Baruteau, C., Kley, W., 2011, MN- RAS, 410, 293 Papaloizou, J. C. B., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 153 Papaloizou, J. C. B., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2010, EAS Publica- tions Series, 42, pp.333-343 Podlewska, E., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2008, MNRAS, 386,1347 Podlewska, E., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1995 Podlewska-Gaca, E., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2253 Podlewska, E., Papaloizou, J. C. B., Szuszkiewicz, E., 2012, MNRAS, 421,1736 Rivera, E. J., Laughlin, G., Butler, R. P., Vogt, S.S., Haghighipour, N., Meschiari, S., 2010, ApJ, 719, 890 Steffen J. H. et al., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2342 Steffen J. H. et al., 2013, MNRAS 428, 1077 Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., Ward, W. R., 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257 Thommes, E. W., 2005, ApJ, 626, 1033 c(cid:13) RAS, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 10
1902.09242	1	1902	2019-02-25T13:05:04	The shape of (7) Iris as evidence of an ancient large impact?	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Asteroid (7) Iris is an ideal target for disk-resolved imaging owing to its brightness (V$\sim$7-8) and large angular size of 0.33 arcsec during its apparitions. Iris is believed to belong to the category of large unfragmented asteroids that avoided internal differentiation, implying that its current shape and topography may record the first few 100 Myr of the solar system's collisional evolution. We recovered information about the shape and surface topography of Iris from disk-resolved VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL images acquired in the frame of our ESO large program. We used the All-Data Asteroid Modeling (ADAM) shape reconstruction algorithm to model the 3D shape of Iris, using optical disk-integrated data and disk-resolved images from SPHERE as inputs. We analyzed the SPHERE images to infer the asteroid's global shape and the morphology of its main craters. We present the volume-equivalent diameter D$_{{\rm eq}}$=214$\pm$5 km, and bulk density $\rho$=2.7$\pm$0.3 g cm$^{-3}$ of Iris. Its shape appears to be consistent with that of an oblate spheroid with a large equatorial excavation. We identified eight putative surface features 20--40 km in diameter detected at several epochs, which we interpret as impact craters. Craters on Iris have depth-to-diameter ratios that are similar to those of analogous 10 km craters on Vesta. The bulk density of Iris is consistent with that of its meteoritic analog, namely LL ordinary chondrites. Considering the absence of a collisional family related to Iris and the number of large craters on its surface, we suggest that its equatorial depression may be the remnant of an ancient (at least 3 Gyr) impact. Iris's shape further opens the possibility that large planetesimals formed as almost perfect oblate spheroids. Finally, we attribute the difference in crater morphology between Iris and Vesta to their different surface gravities.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 34541_final February 26, 2019 c(cid:13) ESO 2019 The shape of (7) Iris as evidence of an ancient large impact? (cid:63) J. Hanuš1, M. Marsset2,3, P. Vernazza4, M. Viikinkoski5, A. Drouard4, M. Brož1, B. Carry6, R. Fetick4, F. Marchis7, L. Jorda4, T. Fusco4, M. Birlan8, T. Santana-Ros9, E. Podlewska-Gaca9,10, E. Jehin11, M. Ferrais11, J. Grice6,12, P. Bartczak9, J. Berthier8, J. Castillo-Rogez13, F. Cipriani14, F. Colas8, G. Dudzi´nski9, C. Dumas15, J. Durech1, M. Kaasalainen5, A. Kryszczynska9, P. Lamy4, H. Le Coroller4, A. Marciniak9, T. Michalowski9, P. Michel6, M. Pajuelo8,16, P. Tanga6, F. Vachier8, A. Vigan4, O. Witasse14, and B. Yang17 1 Institute of Astronomy, Charles University, Prague, V Holešovickách 2, CZ-18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic ∗e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3 Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK 4 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, Marseille, France 5 Department of Mathematics, Tampere University of Technology, PO Box 553, 33101, Tampere, Finland 6 Université Côte d'Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, France 7 SETI Institute, Carl Sagan Center, 189 Bernado Avenue, Mountain View CA 94043, USA 8 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, F-75014 Paris Cedex, France 9 Astronomical Observatory Institute, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Słoneczna 36, 60-286 Pozna´n, Poland 10 Institute of Physics, University of Szczecin, Wielkopolska 15, 70-453 Szczecin, Poland 11 Space sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research Institute, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 17, 4000 Liège, Belgium 12 Open University, School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, MK7 6AA, UK 13 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 14 European Space Agency, ESTEC - Scientific Support Office, Keplerlaan 1, Noordwijk 2200 AG, The Netherlands 15 TMT Observatory, 100 W. Walnut Street, Suite 300, Pasadena, CA 91124, USA 16 Sección Física, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Apartado, Lima 1761, Perú 17 European Southern Observatory (ESO), Alonso de Cordova 3107, 1900 Casilla Vitacura, Santiago, Chile Received x-x-2016 / Accepted x-x-2016 ABSTRACT Context. Asteroid (7) Iris is an ideal target for disk-resolved imaging owing to its brightness (V∼7 -- 8) and large angular size of 0.33(cid:48)(cid:48) during its apparitions. Iris is believed to belong to the category of large unfragmented asteroids that avoided internal differenti- ation, implying that its current shape and topography may record the first few 100 Myr of the solar system's collisional evolution. Aims. We recovered information about the shape and surface topography of Iris from disk-resolved VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL images acquired in the frame of our ESO large program. Methods. We used the All-Data Asteroid Modeling (ADAM) shape reconstruction algorithm to model the 3D shape of Iris, using optical disk-integrated data and disk-resolved images from SPHERE and earlier AO systems as inputs. We analyzed the SPHERE images and our model to infer the asteroid's global shape and the morphology of its main craters. Results. We present the 3D shape, volume-equivalent diameter Deq=214±5 km, and bulk density ρ=2.7±0.3 g· cm−3 of Iris. Its shape appears to be consistent with that of an oblate spheroid with a large equatorial excavation. We identified eight putative surface fea- tures 20 -- 40 km in diameter detected at several epochs, which we interpret as impact craters, and several additional crater candidates. Craters on Iris have depth-to-diameter ratios that are similar to those of analogous 10 km craters on Vesta. Conclusions. The bulk density of Iris is consistent with that of its meteoritic analog based on spectroscopic observations, namely LL ordinary chondrites. Considering the absence of a collisional family related to Iris and the number of large craters on its surface, we suggest that its equatorial depression may be the remnant of an ancient (at least 3 Gyr) impact. Iris's shape further opens the possibility that large planetesimals formed as almost perfect oblate spheroids. Finally, we attribute the difference in crater morphology between Iris and Vesta to their different surface gravities, and the absence of a substantial impact-induced regolith on Iris. Key words. minor planets, asteroids: individual: (7) Iris -- methods: observational -- methods: numerical 9 1 0 2 b e F 5 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 2 4 2 9 0 . 2 0 9 1 : v i X r a 1. Introduction The largest asteroids (typically with D≥200km) are ideal targets for investigating the collisional history of the asteroid belt. Their outer shell has witnessed 4.6 Gyr of collisions, contrary to that of smaller asteroids, which are fragments of once larger bod- (cid:63) Based on observations made with ESO Telescopes at the Paranal Observatory under programme ID 199.C-0074 (PI: P. Vernazza) and 086.C-0785 (PI: B. Carry). ies (Morbidelli et al. 2009). The outer shell and overall shape of many of the large bodies, however, has been affected by ex- ternal processes (such as impacts) and by internal processes via the radioactive decay of 26Al. During the first 100 Myr that fol- lowed their formation, this early heat source generated enough energy to melt/fluidify their interiors, relax their shapes and sur- face topography, and erase their primordial cratering records. Like the terrestrial planets, these bodies (including (1) Ceres and (4) Vesta) do not thus offer the possibility to decode the early col- 1 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL lisional environment of the solar system (≤50 -- 200 Myr after so- lar system formation). More specifically, Fu et al. (2014) found that Vesta's early collisional record (40 -- 200 Myr after CAIs) was erased during its early relaxation phase. The cratering record on Ceres is even less informative as its surface has been contin- uously viscously relaxed over the age of the solar system and has also experienced widespread resurfacing, which explains the lack of large craters observed across its surface (Hiesinger et al. 2016; Marchi et al. 2016). This, however, may not be the case for the parent bodies of ordinary chondrites (OCs), namely S-type asteroids. Both ther- mal evolution models of OC parent bodies (e.g., Monnereau et al. 2013, and references therein) and spectroscopic obser- vations of large S-type families suggest that metamorphosed type 4 -- 6 OCs reflect the internal compositional structure of the largest S-type asteroids (Vernazza et al. 2014). This implies that the interiors of these bodies never melted and impacts have been the only evolution process acting since their formation ∼2 Myr after the formation of the solar system (e.g., Monnereau et al. 2013). Thus, the shapes of the largest S-type objects (D >150 km), and to a lesser extent their topography, may help constrain whether the collisional activity was more important during the first 50 -- 200 Myr of the solar system evolution compared to the subsequent ∼4.4 Gyr. As part of our ESO large program (ID 199.C-0074; Vernazza et al. 2018), we observed asteroid (7) Iris (hereafter Iris) with the VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL instrument over a full rotation. Iris, which is one of the four D>200 km S-type main belt asteroids along with (3) Juno, (15) Eunomia, and (29) Amphitrite (e.g., Viikinkoski et al. 2015a, 2017; Hanuš et al. 2017b), is an ex- ceptional target for direct-resolved imaging with adaptive optics (AO) due to its large angular size as seen from the Earth (0.33(cid:48)(cid:48)) during opposition. Iris is located in the inner part of the asteroid belt, close to Vesta (a = 2.39 au, e = 0.23, i = 5.5◦), and pos- sesses an LL-like surface composition (Vernazza et al. 2014). Unlike many of the largest asteroids, Iris is not associated with a dynamical family. At first sight, this seems to imply that it did not suffer a major impact during its recent history (most families identified to date are younger than 2 Gyr; see Spoto et al. 2015). The article is organized as follows. In Sect. 2.1 we de- scribe our observations, the data reduction, and deconvolution. We present the 3D shape model of Iris and its bulk density in Sect. 3.1. We analyze of the global shape and surface topogra- phy, including a list of the craters, in Sect. 3.2 and Sect. 3.3, re- spectively. Our 3D shape model is then compared to that of Ostro et al. (2010) derived from and independent dataset of radar data. Finally, we summarize the implications of our work in Sect. 4. 2. Observations 2.1. Disk-resolved images Five series of images of Iris were acquired with the SPHERE in- strument (ESO/VLT; Beuzit et al. 2008) during two consecutive nights in October 2017 (see Fig. 1 and Table C.2). The second series from the first night was obtained immediately after the first one, implying that these two epochs sample almost the same ge- ometry (the 7-minute gap between the observations corresponds only to a 5◦ difference in rotation phase). In order not to over- weight this geometry in the shape modeling, we lowered the sta- tistical weight of the first series of images. The three remaining series from the second night of observation are of outstanding quality. We clearly resolved several surface features (that we in- terpret as impact craters) that were consistently present in all im- 2 Fig. 1: VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL images of (7) Iris obtained on October 10 and 11, 2017, and deconvolved with the Mistral al- gorithm. See Table C.2 for details on the observing conditions. ages. The spectacular quality of the images is driven by the large angular size of Iris of 0.33(cid:48)(cid:48). Considering the distance of Iris at the time of our observations, one pixel represents ∼2.3 km at its surface. From our benchmark study of (4) Vesta (Fétick et al. 2019), which orbits approximately at the same distance from the Earth, we know that we can reliably identify surface features down to ∼8 -- 10 pixels in size. The achieved spatial resolution is therefore at least of ∼30 mas, corresponding to a projected dis- tance of ∼20 km. We also note that the apparent geometry of Iris during our observations was limited to the southern hemi- sphere as we observed it almost pole-on (aspect angle ∼160◦). Therefore, even though the aim of the large program was to ob- tain six epochs sampling the full rotation phase, additional im- ages would not have brought enough new information to justify acquiring them. All VLT/SPHERE observations were obtained by the ZIMPOL instrument (Thalmann et al. 2008) in the narrowband imaging configuration (N_R filter; filter central wavelength = 645.9 nm, width = 56.7 nm). The observing strategy is the same for all targets within our ESO large program (see Vernazza et al. 2018, for more details). We used Iris as a natural guide star for AO correction during each series of five cubes of images with a total exposure of 60 s. All images, with the exception of those from the first series, were collected under the required seeing conditions (≤0.8(cid:48)(cid:48)) and an airmass below 1.7. We also observed a nearby star aimed to be used as an estimate of the instrumental point spread function (PSF) for deconvolution pur- poses. However, we later used a parametric PSF for deconvo- lution of the asteroid data rather than the observed one, owing to better performances (see also Viikinkoski et al. 2018; Fétick et al. 2019). Specifically, we utilized the Mistral deconvolu- tion algorithm (Fusco et al. 2003; Mugnier et al. 2004), and a parametric PSF with a Moffat profile (Moffat 1969). The relia- bility of using a parametric PSF for deconvolving asteroid im- J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL ages was demonstrated by applying this method to images of (4) Vesta acquired by our program (Fétick et al. 2019): A compari- son of these images to in situ data collected by the NASA Dawn mission reveals a very good agreement of the surface features detected on Vesta. The deconvolved images of Iris are shown in Fig. 1. In addition to our VLT/SPHERE data, we compiled 19 Keck/NIRC2 and 3 VLT/NaCo images of Iris (see Viikinkoski et al. 2017, and Fig. C.2 and Table C.2 for additional in- formation). Although the difference in spatial resolution be- tween NIRC2 (pixel scale 9.9 mas), NaCo (12.25 mas), and our VLT/SPHERE images (pixel scale 3.6 mas) is rather large, a subset of these older data still contains valuable information about the shape of Iris. Moreover, they sample additional geome- tries (aspect angles of ∼70◦) compared to the VLT/SPHERE im- ages, obtained close to a southern pole-on configuration (aspect angle of ∼160◦). Therefore, the NIRC2 and NaCo data essen- tially provide constraints on the parts of the shape that were not seen by SPHERE, and on the dimension along the rotation axis. Unfortunately, some data were affected by severe deconvolution artifacts, which prevented them from being used for the shape modeling. We list these images for completeness. 2.2. Optical disk-integrated photometry Optical lightcurves are particularly important for the spin pe- riod determination and a proper phasing of the AO images. We downloaded 39 lightcurves from the online Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Techniques (DAMIT1, Durech et al. 2010), which also contains the most recent shape models of the asteroid Iris. In addition, we utilized 94 single lightcurves cover- ing apparitions in 2006, 2008, 2011, and 2012 extracted from the SuperWASP image archive (Grice et al. 2017). The whole opti- cal dataset samples 17 different apparitions between years 1950 and 2013. The characteristics of the photometric data are listed in Table C.3. 3. Results 3.1. 3D shape reconstruction, size, and bulk density We used the All-Data Asteroid Modeling (ADAM) inversion tech- nique (Viikinkoski et al. 2015a; Viikinkoski 2016) for the recon- struction of the 3D shape model and the spin of Iris using disk- integrated (optical lightcurves) and disk-resolved data as inputs. The ADAM technique is a well-described inversion algorithm that has already been applied to tens of asteroids (e.g., Viikinkoski et al. 2015b, 2017, 2018; Hanuš et al. 2017a,b; Marsset et al. 2017; Vernazza et al. 2018). Exhaustive information about this modeling technique can be found in these studies. Optical lightcurves are often required for ADAM, because they stabilize the shape optimization and constrain the parts of the shape not covered by the AO observations. Disk-resolved data provide necessary constraints on the local topography. Without these data, the use of ADAM would be redundant: stan- dard lightcurve inversion codes would be sufficient. We note that the a priori knowledge of the sidereal rotation period and the spin axis orientation of the asteroid is used as an initial input for ADAM. In the case of Iris, both quantities were already con- strained by previous studies (Kaasalainen et al. 2002; Ostro et al. 2010; Viikinkoski et al. 2017). 1 http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/ asteroids3D We applied the ADAM algorithm to our dataset of 133 op- tical lightcurves, 25 VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL images from five different epochs, 19 Keck/NIRC2 images, and three VLT/NaCo images. We first computed a rough global representation of the shape model of Iris by enhancing the weight of the lightcurve data with respect to that of the AO images. We ensured that the shape model solution was stable by testing different com- binations of (i) shape support (i.e., octantoids and subdivision) (ii) AO data types (deconvolved or nondeconvolved images), and (iii) shape model resolutions. Moreover, we lowered the weight of the first-epoch AO SPHERE images, as well as that of several Keck images of poor quality. The low-resolution model was then used as a starting point for the modeling with more topographic details. The resulting model contains the most prominent surface features visible in the SPHERE images (Fig. 2). Table 1 provides the final values for the spin-axis orienta- tion, sidereal rotation period, volume-equivalent diameter, and dimensions along the major axes of Iris. These parameters were computed as their average values from the various shape models, and the reported uncertainties correspond to their range of val- ues within these models. Only one shape model was selected as the representative solution that will be included in the DAMIT database. This solution, which is based on the deconvolved AO data and the octantoid shape support (Viikinkoski et al. 2015a), has parameter values that are slightly different from the average ones reported in Table 1, while within the quoted uncertainties. A comparison between the SPHERE AO images and the corre- sponding projections of the model is shown in Fig. 2. A compar- ison between the Keck/NIRC2 and VLT/NaCo images and the model is provided in Fig. C.2. The shape model contains only the most obvious craters, for which we measured the size and depth (Table 2). In general, the crater sizes derived from the model are overestimated (except for Xanthos; see Sect. 3.3), whereas their depth is underestimated compared to the estimates retrieved directly from the images (Sect. 3.3). This is an outcome of the modeling technique. We combined the volume of Iris derived from our shape model (Table 1) with its mass estimate derived from all reliable estimates found in the literature (see Table C.4, Carry 2012). Specifically, we used the median of the 30 reported mass esti- mates, after removing the five least reliable values. The result- ing mass values are similar to the median of the whole sample. Considering the high number of reliable mass estimates avail- able and their disparity, we consider our mass estimate for Iris to be rather robust: (13.75 ± 1.30) × 1018 kg (1σ error). This leads to a bulk density of ρ = 2.7± 0.3 g/cm3 (1σ error), with an uncertainty that is dominated by the uncertainty on the mass. In order to compare the bulk density of Iris with that of other S-type asteroids, we compiled a database of reliable bulk density measurements for 21 S-type asteroids listed in Table C.1, and shown in Fig. C.3. Iris's bulk density appears slightly lower than that of most of the other large (D > 150 km) S-type asteroids, but it is still consistent within the reported error bars. Finally, the density appears consistent with that of its meteoritic analog, namely LL ordinary chondrites (the mean bulk density of LL chondrites is 3.22 ± 0.22 g/cm3; Consolmagno et al. 2008). 3.2. Global shape The overall shape of Iris is probably one of the most intrigu- ing properties of this body revealed by our observations. Both the SPHERE images and the global appearance of our 3D shape model indicate an oblate spheroidal shape, with a seemingly large excavation close to its equator (Fig. 3). Based on our 3D 3 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Fig. 2: Comparison between the VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL deconvolved images of Iris (bottom panel) and the corresponding projec- tions of our ADAM shape model (top panel). The red line indicates the position of the rotation axis. We use a nonrealistic illumination to highlight the local topography of the model. The selected illumination significantly enhances the ridge that spreads from the top to the bottom of the projections on the left-hand side of the figure. This ridge is a minor modeling artifact caused by the limited number of observing geometries sampled by SPHERE. Ostro et al. (2010) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Parameter Unit D km deg. λ deg. β P h a km b km c km a/b b/c m ρ ×1018 kg (g· cm−3) 208±35 15±5 +25±15 7.1388(1) 253±38 228±34 193±39 1.1±0.2 1.2±0.3 12.5±0.2a 2.66+0.85−0.29 216±7 18±4 +19±4 7.138843(1) 262±10 236±6 182±6 1.11±0.05 1.30±0.05 12.9±2.1b 2.4±0.5 7.138843(1) This work 214±5 19±3 +26±3 268±5 234±4 180±6 1.15±0.03 1.30±0.05 13.75±1.30 2.7±0.3 Table 1: Volume-equivalent diameter (D), dimensions along the major axis (a, b, c), sidereal rotation period (P), spin-axis ecliptic J2000 coordinates (longitude λ and latitude β), mass (m), and bulk density (ρ) of Iris as determined here, compared with values from the works of Ostro et al. (2010) and Viikinkoski et al. (2017). Uncertainties correspond to 1 σ values. a Pitjeva (2005), b Carry (2012). The nearly spheroidal shape of Iris opens the possibility that this asteroid formed as an almost perfect oblate spheroid. If this is the case, its equatorial depression may be the result of a large-scale impact. Yet, this seems surprising considering the ab- sence of a collisional family associated with Iris (Appendix A). Families associated with large asteroids are a common feature in the main belt, and some of these families are known to exist over several Gyr before they dissipate via Yarkovsky drifting and col- lisional grinding (Vokrouhlický et al. 2006; Vokrouhlický et al. 2015). For instance, the NASA Dawn mission revealed ages of 1 and 2 Gyr for the two large craters that form the Rheasilvia basin on Vesta (Schenk et al. 2012; Marchi et al. 2012b), implying sim- ilar ages for the two collisional families associated with Vesta (Milani et al. 2014). Additional old families in the asteroid belt include those of Hygiea (2 Gyr), Eunomia (2.5 Gyr), Koronis (2.5 Gyr), and Themis (3 Gyr) (Brož et al. 2013; Nesvorný et al. 2015; Spoto et al. 2015). Assuming that a large impact is at the origin of the depression, the lack of an Iris family seems to im- ply that the collision occurred during the very early phase of solar system evolution (>3 Gyr ago). This is strengthened by the fact that Iris is located in a dynamically stable region of the as- Fig. 3: Visualization of the shape model of Iris from a southern pole-on view (top), and from the geometry of the second epoch of observation (rotation phase 0.03, bottom). We embedded the shape projection within a circle to highlight the excavated part and included the z-axis orientation. shape model, we estimate that this excavation represents be- tween 10% and 15% of the volume of Iris. 4 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL teroid belt, nearby Vesta, and far away from any strong orbital resonances with the giant planets. This location implies that its family must have depleted very slowly. Numerical integrations for the collisional evolution of the asteroid belt reveal that events able to excavate at least 10% of the mass of Iris happen 0 to 2 times over a timescale of 4 Gyr (see Fig. B.1 and Appendix B). An alternative explanation for the lack of an Iris family could be that Iris experienced, even recently, a near-miss "hit-and-run" collision where it was impacted close to the edge. In this case, the fragments would have gained most of the projectile momen- tum and would have scattered away from the space of the Iris proper orbital elements. Finally, we cannot entirely rule out that Iris may have never had a spheroidal shape, and that its current shape is close to the original one. Our program will help determine whether similar shapes are found for other D∼200 km asteroids. In turn, this will provide new constraints on the origin of asteroid shapes, and the possible link existing between asteroid shapes and the presence of collisional families. 3.3. Impact craters We identified eight topographic features on the images, with typical diameters between 20 -- 50 km, that we consider as puta- tive impact craters based on their apparent circular morphology (Table 2, Fig. 4). We nicknamed them with the Greek names of colors to reflect their association with Iris, the goddess of the rainbow in Greek mythology. The pole-on geometry of Iris dur- ing our observations allowed us to accurately trace the position of the craters throughout a complete rotation period. All the re- ported craters were identified from the images, simultaneously using the shape model to track their location at every epoch in order to verify their reliability and visibility. Six out of the eight identified putative craters are clearly vis- ible in at least three epochs shown in Fig. 4. The remaining two craters were identified at a single epoch that corresponds to the Iris 0.03-rotation phase angle. Of these two craters, the one we call Chrysos is also visible at the 0.72-rotation phase angle. These two craters remained undetected in the other im- ages, likely due to unfavorable illumination conditions (see also Fétick et al. 2019). We indicate their expected location on each image based on the rotation period of Iris, and using their posi- tion on the single image where they were detected as a bench- mark. Several additional surface features considered as potential candidates for impact craters are highlighted in Fig. 4 by the let- ters A -- G. Table 2 summarizes the coordinates, estimated size, and pro- posed names or designations for the identified topographic fea- tures. The reference zero longitude of the asteroid-centric coor- dinate system was defined as the location of the large equatorial depression Xanthos, following the IAU recommendation for the reference frame (Archinal et al. 2018). For each epoch we also indicate whether the feature falls within the visible part of the as- teroid and whether it could be identified on the series of images that corresponds to that epoch. Crater diameters were directly measured on the images by first removing the illumination gra- dient from the asteroid images (see Carry et al. 2008, 2010a, for details), and then by drawing a projection of the image's bright- ness level (number of counts) along the craters and for different orientations. The edges of the craters were defined as the loca- tions where the profiles start to reach a plateau outward from the center of the crater. We used the 3D shape model to measure the planetocentric latitude and longitude of the craters. For the five craters that are visible on the shape model, we computed their diameter and depth following the method described in Vernazza et al. (2018). The values derived for Xanthos and Chrysos are consistent with the measurements from the images, while those for Chloros, Cirrhos, and Glaucos are overestimated by about 50%. Moreover, we measured the depth of three craters con- veniently located near the asteroid's terminator on the images acquired at 0.72-rotation phase angle. This configuration allows us to measure the orthogonal distance from the bottom of the crater to the tangent of the surface between the rims. Specifically, we find a value of ∼15 km for Xanthos, with an uncertainty of 3 km that reflects the pixel scale of the images. A similar depth for Xanthos was also derived from the shape model. This value seems to be robust because the Xanthos appearance on the shape model is largely consistent with the images. In the case of Xanthos, the measured depth-to-diameter (d/D) ratio is ∼0.34. This value is higher than that for sim- ilarly sized craters on Vesta (d/D=0.15 -- 0.27, Vincent et al. 2014). Given that Iris and Vesta are rocky bodies made of simi- lar tensile-strength materials (LL ordinary chondrites and HED achondrites, respectively), the observed difference in crater mor- phology may be due to Vesta's larger surface gravity g (around 3 times higher than that of Iris), which would more efficiently reshape its craters, for example through landslides and erosion. Vesta's larger g also makes it more likely to refill its craters with a reaccreted, impact-generated surface regolith, whereas a larger fraction of impact ejecta would be lost after an impact on a smaller, Iris-sized body. Along these lines, Thomas (1999) found that the crater morphology on asteroids and the satellites of the giant planets scales as the inverse of surface gravity, therefore, 30 km craters on Iris should have (and actually have) similar morphology as 10 km craters on Vesta. Apart from Vesta, the only rocky asteroid imaged by a space- craft where a crater 20 -- 60 km in diameter can be found is (21) Lutetia, a ∼100 km large main belt asteroid. Massilia, the largest crater on Lutetia, has a diameter of 55 km and a depth of about 2 km (Cremonese et al. 2012), which implies d/D = 0.04. This value is significantly lower than the one we derived for Xanthos. Considering the morphology scaling with the inverse of surface gravity, Massilia should be compared to 20 -- 30 km craters on Iris. Clearly, Massilia is rather shallow compared to the craters on Iris, which could be explained by physical resurfacing pro- cesses such as regolith deposits and relaxation. The fact that Massilia's diameter is comparable to the size of Lutetia also cer- tainly impacts its morphology. We also did not see any evidence of complex craters on Iris. In particular, none of the identified putative craters exhibits the presence of a central peak. At first glance, craters with central peaks may be visible on the images acquired at 0.03-rotation phase angle. However, these features all remain undetected on the other images, which are all of slightly higher quality (ac- quired at lower airmass). We therefore attribute them to instru- mental or deconvolution artifacts. Following the scaling law pro- posed by Asphaug et al. (1996), the transition diameter from simple to complex craters for Iris is D = 0.8Y/(g ρ) = 74 km, where Y = 2.107 N.m−2 is the average tensile strength of sili- cates, g = 0.08 m.s−2 is the average gravitational acceleration on Iris, and ρ = 2.7 g.cm−3 is its density. The lack of complex craters and central peaks is therefore not surprising considering the range of crater sizes detected on Iris. Finally, the observed crater density on Iris is similar to that predicted by numerical simulations (see Fig. B.1 and Appendix B) and consistent with the surface age >3 Gyr (i.e., there was not a recent collision that erased the cratering record 5 Crater Xanthos Erythros Cyanos Chloros Cirrhos Porphyra Chrysos Glaucos A B C D E F G λ (◦) 0 255 53 47 2 202 182 164 65 126 67 105 57 18 243 φ (◦) -16 -22 -25 -40 -34 -21 -14 -20 -21 -2 -65 -27 -15 -19 -5 Rotation phase 0.59 0.47 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y n.i. n.i. n.i. n.i. n.d. A - - Y n.i. n.d. Y - - Y Y Y Y 0.72 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y n.d. n.d. n.i. n.i. - n.i. Y 0.03 Y - - n.d. n.d. Y Y Y n.d Y n.i. n.i. Y - - (image) 38±5 31±8 25±5 41±6 23±5 35±5 36±9 30±9 23±5 35±5 21±5 23±5 27±5 43±8 (64×16)±5 (model) 44±5 -- -- 62±5 31±5 -- 37±5 49±5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Diameter (km) Diameter (km) Depth (km) Depth (km) (image) 13±3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5±3 6±3 -- -- -- -- -- (model) 12±2 -- -- 6±2 2±2 -- 3±2 6±2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- d/D (image) 0.34±0.09 0.22±0.14 0.17±0.09 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Table 2: Identified and suggested topographic features on Iris. We indicate for each epoch whether we clearly identified the feature (Y); if we probably identified it, but the contours were not well defined (n.d.); if we did not identify it (n.i.); or if the feature does not fall within the visible part of the surface (-). The uncertainties in the diameter (D) and depth (d) values were computed as their variance across the complete set of images in which they are visible, unless the variance is lower than 3 km. In that case the uncertainty was set to 3 km, which reflects a conservative approximation of the pixel size at the distance of Iris (∼2.3 km). Moreover, we also included crater diameters and depths measured on the shape model. Their uncertainties reflect the resolution of the shape model. Fig. 4: Identified and proposed surface features on Iris. Putative impact craters are indicated by names and often with a contour showing the estimated area they cover. Candidates for impact craters are indicated by white-font letters and contours, in italic if the contours were not clearly defined. A question mark indicates the expected position of a feature that could not be identified on the image, likely due to unfavorable illumination. on Iris). This highlights that models simulating the collisional evolution of the asteroid belt have become robust. and fresurf. Naturally, the age of the surface is counted from the last catastrophic or reaccumulation event. 3.4. Comparison with (4) Vesta and (21) Lutetia In order to compare the cratering record on the surface of Iris with records on (4) Vesta and (21) Lutetia, we computed the corresponding crater density n on Iris. For the six craters with Dc > 30 km observed on Iris and the surface area correspond- ing to a 220 km sphere, i.e., slightly larger than for an equivalent volume, we obtained n = 3.9· 10−5 km−2. This value is clearly a lower limit because (i) only about a half of the surface was ob- served by SPHERE, (ii) there might still be some observational bias, and (iii) the cratering record could be affected by resurfac- ing. This would increase n by corresponding factors: fvisible, fbias, For comparison, (4) Vesta and its Rheasylvia (RS) basin floor has a crater density nRS = 1.7· 10−5 km−2 and an esti- mated age of tRS (cid:17) 1 Gyr (Marchi et al. 2012b, 2015). If we assume the factors fvisible = 2, fbias = 1, and fresurf = 1 for simplicity, the age of the surface of Iris would theoretically be t (cid:17) fvisible fbias fresurf (n/nRS) tRS (cid:38) 4.0 Gyr. More precisely, we should use the π-scaling factor of Melosh (1989) for the projectile-to-crater (Dc-to-dp) size scaling (see Appendix B and Eq. B.1): for the same projectile population with dp ≥ 2 km, we should have crater diameters Dc ≥ 19.3 km on Vesta (we ne- glect the minor differences in collisional probabilities, and gravi- tational focusing factors). Finally, we also considered the heavily cratered terrains (HCT) on Vesta, for which the crater density is 6 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL nHCT (cid:17) 9.5· 10−5 km−2. Assuming this unit is as old as 4.0 Gyr, it would lead to t = 3.3 Gyr for the age of the surface of Iris. On the other hand, (21) Lutetia and its Achaia region has a crater density of nAch (cid:17) 2· 10−4 km−2. This value is substantially higher than for Iris and Vesta; however, it is extrapolated from Dc = 20 km with an uncertainty of at least a factor of 2 (there are actually no 30 km craters on Achaia). The corresponding surface age is up to 3.8 Gyr, i.e., presumably formed during the late heavy bombardment (Marchi et al. 2012a). The π-scaling factor is very similar to that for Iris. However, a statistics of small numbers plays an important role in this case. Consequently, the inferred age is very uncertain, it may be lower than 1 Gyr, or reach up to 3 Gyr (1σ). 3.5. Comparison with the radar model of Ostro et al. (2010) An exceptional dataset of Iris delay-Doppler images (the best dataset for a main belt asteroid) was acquired in November 2006 by the Arecibo observatory when Iris was at a distance of only 0.85 AU from the Earth (Ostro et al. 2010). By coincidence, our SPHERE observations were obtained at an observing geometry very similar to that of the radar data, so both datasets map only the southern hemisphere of Iris. This is very convenient for the comparison of the performance of the two independent model- ing approaches. A radar-based shape model of Iris was recon- structed by Ostro et al. (2010) and kindly provided in the form of a polyhedron by Chris Magri. Unfortunately, the uncertainty in the rotation period from Ostro et al. (2010) was too large to compute the correct rotation phase of the Iris radar model at the time of the SPHERE observations in 2017. Therefore, we found the optimal rotation offset by visually comparing the radar pro- jections for different values of the rotation phase to the projec- tions of the ADAM model and the SPHERE images. We identified several common surface features on both models and images, so the estimated rotation phase of the radar shape model seems to be reliable at the level of ∼5 degrees. There are substantial discrepancies between the radar and the AO images as shown in Fig. 2. Specifically, the contours of the radar shape model projections do not agree well with those of the images or ADAM model, which is most apparent in epochs 3 -- 5 (rotation phases 0.47, 0.59, and 0.72). Considering that de- convolution of disk-resolved images obtained with AO-fed cam- eras have been validated by several spacecraft encounters (e.g., Witasse et al. 2006; Carry et al. 2008, 2010b, 2012; Russell et al. 2016), we conclude that the appearance of the radar shape model is not accurate. On the other hand, several surface features (craters Xanthos, Chloros, Cyanos, and Erythras) identified in the SPHERE images are present in the radar-based model. The concavity related to the Xanthos crater is very prominent in the radar model and is significantly enhanced compared to the AO images or the ADAM model. In general, the topography of the radar-based model is more dramatic and exaggerated compared to the SPHERE images, and it contains some spurious features (e.g., sharp mountains) not detected in our images. However, the fact that the main surface features seen in the SPHERE images are also described by the radar-based model illustrates a partial robustness of the modeling technique. Finally, the radar model contains a large concavity in the C region that we identified only in one AO epoch (rotation phase 0.47). This further supports the existence of this proposed can- didate for an impact feature. The radar model indicates a single impact basin, while the image and the ADAM shape model tends to be more consistent with two partially overlapping craters. 4. Summary We obtained VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL images of (7) Iris reveal- ing surface details for this object with unprecedented precision. Our set of images was used to constrain and characterize Iris's 3D shape (hence volume and density when combining the lat- ter with current mass estimates), identify several impact craters, measure their sizes, and (for some) their depth. The nearly pole- on orientation of Iris during our observations allowed us to track impact surface features throughout its rotation and to easily dis- criminate real features from instrumental and deconvolution ar- tifacts, while highlighting the level of reliability of features iden- tification with SPHERE. The derived bulk density for Iris (2.7±0.3 g· cm−3) appears consistent with its LL ordinary chondrite surface composition. The shape of Iris is reminiscent of an almost perfect oblate spheroid with a large equatorial excavation. This may suggest that Iris formed with a spheroidal shape and subsequently suf- fered a large impact. In that case, the lack of an asteroid fam- ily associated with Iris would imply that this impact occurred a long time ago (>3 Gyr). Alternatively, this excavation may be the result of a more recent near-miss hit-and-run collision, in which the fragments were scattered far away from the space of the proper orbital elements of Iris. However, the surface age of ∼3 -- 4 Gyr inferred from the crater density makes the recent colli- sion unlikely. It should be noted that we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that this apparent excavation reflects the original shape of Iris. Additional AO observations of large asteroids with and without families will help tackle this question. Our shape model appears to be only partially consistent with the radar-based shape model of Ostro et al. (2010): Both mod- els contain similar surface features that we associated with the largest impact craters on Iris covering its southern hemisphere and equatorial region. However, the contours of the radar shape model projections do not agree well with those of the images and the ADAM model. The partial agreement between the two shape- reconstruction methods based on two independent datasets sup- ports the reliability of the surface features interpreted here as putative impact basins, and suggests that the radar-based shape model tends to overestimate the surface topography and to re- produce less accurately the global appearance of Iris. Finally, we attribute the difference in the morphology (d/D) of similarly sized craters (d ∼30 -- 50 km) between Iris and Vesta (both rocky bodies are made of similar tensile-strength materi- als) to their different surface gravity, and the absence of a sub- stantial impact-induced regolith on Iris. Acknowledgements. We thank Simone Marchi for his pertinent and constructive remarks. JH and JD were supported by grant 18-09470S from the Czech Science Foundation. This work has been supported by the Czech Science Foundation through grants 18-09470S (J. Hanuš, J. Durech) and 18-04514J (M. Brož) and by the Charles University Research program No. UNCE/SCI/023. P. Vernazza, A. Drouard, J. Grice, and B. Carry were supported by CNRS/INSU/PNP. We thank Chris Magri for kindly providing the radar shape model published in Ostro et al. (2010). References Archinal, B. A., Acton, C. H., A'Hearn, M. F., et al. 2018, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 130, 22 Dynamical Astronomy, 109, 101 Archinal, B. A., A'Hearn, M. F., Bowell, E., et al. 2011, Celestial Mechanics and Aslan, Z., Gumerov, R., Hudkova, L., et al. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 370, Solar and Stellar Physics Through Eclipses, ed. O. Demircan, S. O. Selam, & B. Albayrak, 52 -- 58 Asphaug, E., Moore, J. M., Morrison, D., et al. 1996, Icarus, 120, 158 Baer, J. & Chesley, S. R. 2017, AJ, 154, 76 7 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Nesvorný, D., Brož, M., & Carruba, V. 2015, Identification and Dynamical Properties of Asteroid Families, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke, 297 -- 321 Ostro, S. J., Magri, C., Benner, L. A. M., et al. 2010, Icarus, 207, 285 Pitjeva, E. V. 2004, in COSPAR, Plenary Meeting, Vol. 35, 35th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, ed. J.-P. Paillé, 2014 Pitjeva, E. V. 2005, Solar System Research, 39, 176 Pitjeva, E. V. 2010, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 261, IAU Symposium, ed. S. A. Klioner, P. K. Seidelmann, & M. H. Soffel, 170 -- 178 Pitjeva, E. V. 2013, Solar System Research, 47, 386 Russell, C. T., Raymond, C. A., Ammannito, E., et al. 2016, Science, 353, 1008 Schenk, P., O'Brien, D. P., Marchi, S., et al. 2012, Science, 336, 694 Schmidt, R. M. & Housen, K. R. 1987, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 5, 543 Sierks, H., Lamy, P., Barbieri, C., et al. 2011, Science, 334, 487 Siltala, L. & Granvik, M. 2017, Icarus, 297, 149 Spoto, F., Milani, A., & Kneževi´c, Z. 2015, Icarus, 257, 275 Taylor, R. C. 1977, AJ, 82, 441 Thalmann, C., Schmid, H. M., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 70143F Thomas, P. C. 1999, Icarus, 142, 89 van Houten-Groeneveld, I. & van Houten, C. J. 1958, ApJ, 127, 253 Vasiliev, M. V. & Yagudina, E. I. 1999, in Communications of IAA of RAS Vernazza, P., Brož, M., Drouard, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A154 Vernazza, P., Zanda, B., Binzel, R. P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 120 Veverka, J., Robinson, M., Thomas, P., et al. 2000, Meteoritics amp Planetary Science, vol. 35, Supplement, p.A164, 35 Viikinkoski, M. 2016, PhD thesis, Tampere University of Technology Viikinkoski, M., Hanuš, J., Kaasalainen, M., Marchis, F., & Durech, J. 2017, Viikinkoski, M., Kaasalainen, M., & Durech, J. 2015a, A&A, 576, A8 Viikinkoski, M., Kaasalainen, M., Durech, J., et al. 2015b, A&A, 581, L3 Viikinkoski, M., Vernazza, P., Hanuš, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, L3 Vincent, J.-B., Schenk, P., Nathues, A., et al. 2014, Planet. Space Sci., 103, 57 Viswanathan, V., Fienga, A., Gastineau, M., & Laskar, J. 2017, Notes Scientifiques et Techniques de l'Institut de mécanique céleste, (ISSN 1621- 3823), #108, ISBN 2-910015-79-3 , 2017, 39 pp., 108 Vokrouhlický, D., Bottke, W. F., Chesley, S. R., Scheeres, D. J., & Statler, T. S. 2015, in Asteroids IV, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke (The University of Arizona Press), 509 -- 531 Vokrouhlický, D., Brož, M., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorný, D., & Morbidelli, A. 2006, Witasse, O., Lebreton, J.-P., Bird, M. K., et al. 2006, Journal of Geophysical Icarus, 182, 118 Research (Planets), 111, 7 Zhou, X. H., Yang, X. Y., & Wu, Z. X. 1982, Acta Astronomica Sinica, 23, 349 Zielenbach, W. 2011, AJ, 142, 120 Appendix A: Lack of an Iris family We demonstrate here the absence of an apparent collisional family linked to Iris. Iris is located in the inner main belt at ap = 2.386 AU, ep = 0.213, and sin Ip = 0.111. From the lat- est (September 2018) catalog of proper elements from Kneževi´c & Milani (2003), we consider the subset of asteroids with albedo similar to that of Iris, pV = 0.252 (to within ±0.1), and confirm that there is no clustering of asteroids in the orbital parameter space of Iris (Fig. A.1). In the vicinity of Iris, there is only one identified family located at lower inclinations and related to the C-type asteroid (163) Erigone. From a dynamical point of view, there are no strong resonances near Iris except for the three-body resonance 4:2:1 with Jupiter and Saturn at 2.4 AU. The Jupiter 3:1 mean-motion resonance is farther away from Iris. Appendix B: Collisional evolution of Iris The collisional evolution of Iris was modeled using the Boulder code for Monte Carlo collisional simulations (Morbidelli et al. 2009; Cibulková et al. 2014), in a similar way to that described in Vernazza et al. (2018) for asteroid (89) Julia. We describe here only the main steps of the procedure, while additional details can be found in the above-mentioned study. Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., & Gastineau, M. 2008, A&A, 477, 315 Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., Gastineau, M., & Verma, A. 2013, ArXiv A&A, 607, A117 Baer, J., Chesley, S. R., & Matson, R. D. 2011, AJ, 141, 143 Baer, J., Milani, A., Chesley, S. R., & Matson, R. D. 2008, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 40, 493 Belton, M. J. S., Chapman, C. R., Thomas, P. C., et al. 1995, Nature, 374, 785 Benz, W. & Asphaug, E. 1999, Icarus, 142, 5 Beuzit, J.-L., Feldt, M., Dohlen, K., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 701418 Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorný, D., et al. 2005, Icarus, 179, 63 Brož, M., Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A117 Carry, B. 2012, Planet. Space Sci., 73, 98 Carry, B., Dumas, C., Fulchignoni, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 235 Carry, B., Dumas, C., Kaasalainen, M., et al. 2010a, Icarus, 205, 460 Carry, B., Kaasalainen, M., Leyrat, C., et al. 2010b, A&A, 523, A94 Carry, B., Kaasalainen, M., Merline, W. J., et al. 2012, Planet. Space Sci., 66, 200 68, 1 147 Chang, Y. C. & S., C. C. 1963, Acta Astronomica Sinica, 11, 139 Chernetenko, Y. A. & Kochetova, O. M. 2002, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 500, Asteroids, Comets, and Meteors: ACM 2002, ed. B. Warmbein, 437 -- 440 Cibulková, H., Brož, M., & Benavidez, P. G. 2014, Icarus, 241, 358 Consolmagno, G., Britt, D., & Macke, R. 2008, Chemie der Erde / Geochemistry, Cremonese, G., Martellato, E., Marzari, F., et al. 2012, Planet. Space Sci., 66, Dahlgren, M. 1998, A&A, 336, 1056 Durech, J., Sidorin, V., & Kaasalainen, M. 2010, A&A, 513, A46 Fétick, R. J., Jorda, L., Vernazza, P., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints Fienga, A. 2018, pers. comm. Fienga, A., Kuchynka, P., Laskar, J., Manche, H., & Gastineau, M. 2011, EPSC- DPS Joint Meeting 2011, 1879 e-prints notes 1 Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., Gastineau, M., & Verma, A. 2014, Scientific Foglia, S. 1992, Minor Planet Bulletin, 19, 19 Folkner, W. M., Williams, J. G., & Boggs, D. H. 2009, IPN Progress Report, 42, Fu, R. R., Hager, B. H., Ermakov, A. I., & Zuber, M. T. 2014, Icarus, 240, 133 Fujiwara, A., Kawaguchi, J., Yeomans, D. K., et al. 2006, Science, 312, 1330 Fusco, T., Mugnier, L. M., Conan, J.-M., et al. 2003, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4839, Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, ed. P. L. Wizinowich & D. Bonaccini, 1065 -- 1075 Gehrels, T. & Owings, D. 1962, ApJ, 135, 906 Goffin, E. 2014, A&A, 565, A56 Grice, J., Snodgrass, C., Green, S. F., Parley, N. R., & Carry, B. 2017, in Asteroids, Comets, and Meteors: ACM 2017 Groeneveld, I. & Kuiper, G. P. 1954, ApJ, 120, 200 Hanuš, J., Marchis, F., Viikinkoski, M., Yang, B., & Kaasalainen, M. 2017a, A&A, 599, A36 Hanuš, J., Viikinkoski, M., Marchis, F., et al. 2017b, A&A, 601, A114 Hiesinger, H., Marchi, S., Schmedemann, N., et al. 2016, Science, 353, aaf4758 Hoffmann, M. & Geyer, E. H. 1993, A&AS, 101, 621 Ivantsov, A. 2008, Planet. Space Sci., 56, 1857 Kaasalainen, M., Torppa, J., & Piironen, J. 2002, Icarus, 159, 369 Kneževi´c, Z. & Milani, A. 2003, A&A, 403, 1165 Kochetova, O. M. 2004, Solar System Research, 38, 66 Kochetova, O. M. & Chernetenko, Y. A. 2014, Solar System Research, 48, 295 Konopliv, A. S., Asmar, S. W., Folkner, W. M., et al. 2011, Icarus, 211, 401 Krasinsky, G. A., Pitjeva, E. V., Vasiliev, M. V., & Yagudina, E. I. 2001, in Communications of IAA of RAS Kuchynka, P. & Folkner, W. M. 2013, Icarus, 222, 243 Lagerkvist, C.-I. & Williams, I. P. 1987, A&AS, 68, 295 Marchi, S., Chapman, C. R., Barnouin, O. S., Richardson, J. E., & Vincent, J.-B. 2015, Cratering on Asteroids, ed. P. Michel, F. E. DeMeo, & W. F. Bottke, 725 -- 744 I., Raymond, C. A., et al. 2016, Nature Marchi, S., Ermakov, A. Communications, 7, 12257 Marchi, S., Massironi, M., Vincent, J.-B., et al. 2012a, Planet. Space Sci., 66, 87 Marchi, S., McSween, H. Y., O'Brien, D. P., et al. 2012b, Science, 336, 690 Marsset, M., Carry, B., Dumas, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A64 Melosh, H. J. 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process Milani, A., Cellino, A., Kneževi´c, Z., et al. 2014, Icarus, 239, 46 Moffat, A. 1969, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3, 455 Monnereau, M., Toplis, M. J., Baratoux, D., & Guignard, J. 2013, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 119, 302 Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorný, D., & Levison, H. F. 2009, Icarus, 204, Mugnier, L. M., Fusco, T., & Conan, J.-M. 2004, JOSA A, 21, 1841 558 8 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL 1.61gdp v2 imp −β(cid:32) mp ρt (cid:33) 1 3 Running a hundred simulations, we found that the evolved size-frequency distribution of the asteroid belt closely matches the observed distribution, except for the short-end tail (D < 1 km), which is affected by observation incompleteness. The evolved Iris population contains some fragments, with the largest fragment typically ranging between 5 and 10 km in size. This is not enough to expect an observable family at any time because small asteroids quickly disperse via the Yarkovsky ef- fect on timescales of a few 100 Myr. Moreover, we found that about 10 % of the simulations barely produced any observable fragments, with the largest fragment having D < 2 km. Next, we performed an extraction of impact events relevant to the craters seen on Iris. We used the π-scaling factor of Melosh (1989) for the projectile-to-crater (Dc-to-dp) size scaling, Dc = CD sin 1 3 φ, (B.1) where CD = 1.6 and β = 0.22 are the material parameters for competent rock or saturated soil (Schmidt & Housen 1987), g is the gravitational acceleration of the target, mp is the projectile mass, ρp = 3000 kg m−3 its density, ρt the target density, and φ = 45◦ the assumed mean impact angle. Using this scaling law, the measured sizes of the craters seen on Iris (Dc = 20 − 40 km) imply projectile sizes of dp = 1.2 to 2.9 km. The number of impact events with dp > 2.0 km is shown in Fig. B.1. We selected this size of impactor because it corre- sponds to a crater size of ∼30 km. Such craters and larger ones were easily identified in the images, contrary to the smaller ones, which are on the detection limit and their true number should be significantly higher than suggested by our analysis. The me- dian number of events is ∼35, with 10% and 90% percentile of 25 to 48, which is larger than the observed number of craters of ∼10 (including the candidates). However, our detected craters lie only on the southern hemisphere; therefore, their expected num- ber should be larger by a factor of 2. Moreover, we likely did not identify all the craters on the surface, due to unfavorable il- lumination (see Fétick et al. 2019, where we discuss this in more detail). Finally, our simulations neglect all kinds of resurfacing and crater degradation by the ejecta, which should further de- crease the number of detected craters. As a result, the number of detected craters is consistent with the numerical model, which makes the surface age of >3 Gyr plausible. We then focused on impacts that are neither cratering events nor catastrophic disruptions. Such impacts can significantly al- ter the global shape of the original Iris parent body, and explain the observed depression on Iris (Section 3.2). Our simulations reveal that events able to produce an ejected mass over the par- ent body mass ratio of Mej/Mpb > 1 %, which corresponds to the observed excavated volume of the depression on Iris (i.e., ∼10% of the Iris' volume), happen usually once or twice in 4 Gyr in about half of the simulations (Fig. B.1). Here we assume that the ejected mass of about 10% of the excavated mass for Iris is greater than for Julia (2%, Vernazza et al. 2018), however, still reasonable because the proposed impact on Iris is larger than on Julia. Clearly, the ejected mass compared to the excavated mass increases with the impactor size (it is zero for small im- pactors and equals the excavated mass for catastrophic disrup- tions). Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that Iris has suffered such a large collision in the past. While this appears incompatible with the lack of a collisional family associated with Iris, we note that a nearly missed colli- sion, where the target is hit close to its edge, has a similar proba- bility of happening as a direct hit: for a projectile that delivers at 9 Fig. A.1: Vicinity of (7) Iris in the ap vs. sin Ip space of proper orbital elements. The eccentricity range is ep ∈ (0.162; 0.262). Asteroids with albedo within ±0.1 of the Iris value (pV = 0.252), are plotted in yellow, with symbol size proportional to the body diameter. Asteroids with unknown albedo are plotted as gray dots. The family visible at sin Ip (cid:17) 0.09 is related to the dark C-type asteroid (163) Erigone. The dashed ellipse corresponds to the escape velocity from Iris, vesc (cid:17) 130 m s−1, converted to orbital elements using the Gauss equations. This velocity was computed for true anomaly f = 180◦ and argument of perihe- lion ω = 0◦. Fig. B.1: Number of simulations in which particular events were detected: (i) the ejected mass Mej over the parent-body mass Mpb was > 1 %; (ii) the projectile diameter was dp > 2.0 km. The former is related to the shape of (7) Iris, the latter to the number of impact craters >30 km on Iris. We considered two populations of objects: the main aster- oid belt, and Iris and its collisional fragments. We assumed a constant intrinsic collisional probability of Pi = 3.10 × 10−18 km−2 yr−1, and impact velocities of vimp = 5.28 km s−1 (Dahlgren 1998). A size-dependent dynamical decay was in- cluded, with rates taken from Bottke et al. (2005). We used the standard scaling law of Benz & Asphaug (1999) for the kinetic energy threshold Q(cid:63) D(r) of basalt at impact velocities of 5 km s−1. The density of Iris and its fragments was set to ρ = 2.7 g cm−3. The nominal time span of the simulations was set to 4 Gyr. Multiple simulations with different random seeds were performed, allowing fractional probabilities for breakups of the individual large asteroids. Initial conditions were chosen to match the observed size-frequency distribution of the asteroid belt. sin Ipap / au7163 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 2.3 2.32 2.34 2.36 2.38 2.4 2.42 2.44 2.46 2.48J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL √ least half of its kinetic energy, the effective cross section is πR2 t . For a projectile that almost misses the target, it is π(Rt+rp)2−πR2 t . 2 − 1) Rt. In such a col- These areas become equal for rp = ( lision, the fragments would gain enough momentum to be scat- tered far away from the impacted body. Considering that we observe a nonnegligible number of large asteroids (D > 100 km) associated with families (Nesvorný et al. 2015), we expect that some nearly missed objects must also ex- ist in the main belt. Placing Iris in the context of a substantial sample of similarly sized asteroids will help determine whether the near-miss collision constitutes a viable process to explain the shape of these objects, and the absence of families associ- ated with them. This will be possible in the near future when the sample of asteroids with AO-resolved topography reaches sev- eral tens of objects. Appendix C: Additional figures and tables 10 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Fig. C.1: Comparison between the VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL deconvolved images of Iris (middle panel) and the corresponding pro- jections of our shape model (top panel), and the shape model of Ostro et al. (2010) based on delay-Doppler data collected with Arecibo (bottom panel). The red line indicates the position of the rotation axis. We used a nonrealistic illumination to highlight the local topography of the models. We highlight the main topographic features. 11 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Fig. C.2: Comparison between the Keck/NIRC2 and VLT/NaCo deconvolved images of Iris (rows 2 and 4), and the corresponding projections of our shape model (rows 1 and 3). The red line indicates the position of the rotation axis. Data affected by deconvolution artifacts were not used for the shape modeling. 12 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Fig. C.3: Reliable bulk density measurements for 21 S-type as- teroids compiled from the literature. 13 Table C.1: Size and bulk density estimates of large S-type asteroids compiled from the literature. We only list asteroids with reliable bulk density determinations. We also include our new estimates for Iris. J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Asteroid 3 Juno 5 Astraea 6 Hebe 7 Iris 8 Flora 9 Metis 11 Parthenope 12 Victoria 14 Irene 15 Eunomia 18 Melpomene 21 Lutetia 23 Thalia 29 Amphitrite 39 Laetitia 28 Bellona 243 Ida 433 Eros 471 Papagena 532 Herculina 25143 Itokawa DV [km] 249±5 114±4 193±6 214±5 140±4 168±3 155±5 115±3 155±6 275±5 146±3 98±2 120±8 204±3 164±3 135±7 31.3±1.2 16.20±0.16 132±4 191±4 0.32±0.01 Reference Viikinkoski et al. (2015b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Marsset et al. (2017) This work Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Sierks et al. (2011) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Archinal et al. (2011) Veverka et al. (2000) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Fujiwara et al. (2006) ρ [g.cm−3] 3.32±0.40 3.4±0.7 3.5±0.6 2.7±0.3 4.4±0.6 3.4±0.7 3.1±0.4 3.1±0.6 1.4±0.5 2.9±0.2 2.0±0.8 3.4±0.3 2.3±0.4 2.9±0.5 2.0±0.5 2.0±0.3 2.6±0.5 2.67±0.10 2.5±1.5 3.2±0.8 1.90±0.13 Reference Viikinkoski et al. (2015b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Marsset et al. (2017) This work Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Sierks et al. (2011) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Viikinkoski et al. (2017) Belton et al. (1995) Veverka et al. (2000) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Hanuš et al. (2017b) Fujiwara et al. (2006) Notes. The table gives the volume-equivalent diameter DV and its reference, and the bulk density ρ and its reference. Table C.3: List of optical disk-integrated lightcurves used for ADAM shape modeling. For each lightcurve the table gives the epoch, the number of individual measurements Np, the asteroid's distances to the Earth ∆ and the Sun r, phase angle ϕ, photometric filter, and observation information. N Epoch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 1950-08-12.2 1950-08-13.2 1950-08-14.2 1950-08-16.2 1952-01-28.3 1955-12-28.5 1955-12-29.4 1956-01-02.5 1956-01-05.5 1956-03-08.4 1958-11-05.2 1963-02-02.7 1963-02-03.6 1968-06-12.2 1968-06-13.3 1973-10-28.4 1973-12-15.3 1973-12-16.3 1974-02-16.3 1974-02-17.2 1980-10-14.6 1980-11-08.6 1984-09-29.4 1989-01-02.9 1989-01-04.1 1989-04-29.9 1989-05-02.9 1990-02-05.2 1990-02-06.2 1991-08-19.0 1991-09-03.0 1991-09-04.0 1991-09-05.0 1991-09-18.0 1991-11-01.9 1991-11-06.9 2010-12-10.1 2010-12-11.1 2013-08-15.0 2006-10-11 2006-11-27 2006-11-28 2006-11-29 2006-11-30 2006-12-05 2006-12-06 2008-01-31 2008-02-21 Np 34 25 22 9 82 39 39 35 18 64 62 63 99 18 45 27 46 58 17 7 49 40 52 18 538 70 42 33 15 38 75 26 40 44 9 23 623 589 173 47 40 41 42 92 72 76 47 87 ∆ (AU) 1.70 1.71 1.72 1.73 1.18 1.91 1.90 1.86 1.83 1.57 0.86 1.21 1.21 1.92 1.93 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.38 1.39 0.97 1.10 1.32 1.42 1.42 2.17 2.21 2.92 2.90 1.12 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.21 1.25 1.31 1.30 1.18 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.91 0.91 2.35 2.11 r (AU) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.49 2.16 2.38 2.38 2.39 2.40 2.55 1.84 2.12 2.12 2.88 2.88 1.88 1.96 1.96 2.10 2.10 1.91 1.87 1.84 2.22 2.22 2.52 2.52 2.92 2.92 2.07 2.04 2.03 2.03 2.00 1.92 1.91 2.05 2.05 2.19 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.85 1.85 2.76 2.79 ϕ (◦) 17.4 17.7 18.0 18.6 5.2 23.4 23.3 22.7 22.1 4.3 8.7 13.0 13.4 8.4 8.8 29.1 8.8 8.2 22.8 23.0 14.3 24.8 31.9 18.7 18.4 23.4 23.4 19.4 19.5 12.6 6.4 6.1 5.9 7.7 26.4 27.7 22.9 22.5 4.4 20.2 8.8 9.3 9.9 10.5 13.3 13.8 20.3 17.0 Filter Site Observer Reference V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V C C C C C -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO MDO -- -- KPNO KPNO STEW KPNO KPNO STEW STEW -- -- CMC HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO HLO -- -- -- -- -- SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP Braun, Rubingh Braun, Rubingh Braun, Rubingh Braun, Rubingh Braun, Rubingh vH-G&vH vH-G&vH vH-G&vH vH-G&vH Kuiper -- -- -- Dunlap, Taylor Dunlap, Taylor Dunlap Taylor Taylor Capen Capen -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Foglia Foglia -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Groeneveld & Kuiper (1954) Groeneveld & Kuiper (1954) Groeneveld & Kuiper (1954) Groeneveld & Kuiper (1954) Groeneveld & Kuiper (1954) van Houten-Groeneveld & van Houten (1958) van Houten-Groeneveld & van Houten (1958) van Houten-Groeneveld & van Houten (1958) van Houten-Groeneveld & van Houten (1958) van Houten-Groeneveld & van Houten (1958) Gehrels & Owings (1962) Chang & S. (1963) Chang & S. (1963) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Taylor (1977) Zhou et al. (1982) Zhou et al. (1982) Lagerkvist & Williams (1987) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Hoffmann & Geyer (1993) Foglia (1992) Foglia (1992) Gerald Rousseau Gerald Rousseau Patrick Sogorb Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) 14 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL N 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 Epoch 2008-02-27 2008-02-28 2008-02-28 2008-03-01 2008-03-01 2008-03-02 2008-03-02 2008-03-10 2008-03-13 2008-03-19 2008-06-10 2008-06-22 2008-06-24 2008-06-25 2008-06-26 2010-10-25 2010-10-26 2010-12-12 2010-12-13 2010-12-27 2010-12-31 2011-01-01 2011-01-02 2011-01-03 2011-01-04 2011-01-05 2011-01-06 2011-01-07 2011-01-10 2011-02-18 2011-02-19 2011-02-20 2011-02-21 2011-02-22 2011-02-23 2011-02-24 2011-02-25 2011-03-01 2011-03-02 2012-02-19 2012-02-20 2012-02-21 2012-02-23 2012-02-24 2012-02-25 2012-02-26 2012-03-01 2012-03-02 2012-03-03 2012-03-06 2012-03-07 2012-03-07 2012-03-08 2012-03-08 2012-03-09 2012-03-13 2012-03-17 2012-03-18 2012-03-19 2012-03-20 2012-03-20 2012-03-25 2012-03-25 2012-03-31 2012-04-01 2012-04-01 2012-04-02 2012-04-02 2012-04-03 2012-04-03 2012-04-04 2012-04-05 2012-04-05 2012-04-10 2012-04-11 2012-04-11 2012-04-12 2012-04-12 2012-04-15 2012-04-20 2012-04-23 2012-04-29 2012-04-29 Np 39 42 44 59 74 56 81 67 57 58 95 39 63 63 45 39 91 127 55 75 76 52 79 56 63 65 50 50 48 119 86 72 99 103 103 103 77 95 91 41 43 43 47 49 49 43 47 51 51 65 51 75 81 89 82 79 63 71 72 43 52 56 59 44 79 93 87 101 79 89 54 47 84 125 121 131 99 109 98 55 43 55 57 ∆ (AU) 2.05 2.04 2.04 2.03 2.03 2.02 2.02 1.95 1.93 1.90 2.38 2.54 2.57 2.58 2.60 1.69 1.68 1.29 1.28 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.38 1.39 1.40 1.44 1.45 2.58 2.57 2.55 2.53 2.51 2.50 2.49 2.43 2.42 2.41 2.37 2.36 2.36 2.34 2.34 2.33 2.28 2.24 2.23 2.21 2.20 2.20 2.15 2.15 2.09 2.08 2.09 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.07 2.06 2.05 2.05 2.02 2.01 2.01 2.00 2.00 1.98 1.96 1.95 1.93 1.93 r (AU) 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.81 2.81 2.82 2.82 2.83 2.91 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 1.95 1.96 2.06 2.06 2.10 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.13 2.23 2.23 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.25 2.25 2.26 2.26 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.92 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.93 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.94 ϕ (◦) 15.5 15.3 15.3 14.8 14.8 14.5 14.5 12.1 11.1 8.9 18.9 20.0 20.1 20.1 20.2 30.6 30.5 21.8 21.4 15.5 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.4 10.9 10.4 9.9 8.3 13.6 14.1 14.5 14.9 15.2 15.6 16.0 16.3 17.7 18.0 19.6 19.5 19.4 19.3 19.2 19.2 19.1 18.7 18.6 18.4 18.0 17.9 17.9 17.7 17.8 17.6 16.9 16.1 15.9 15.7 15.5 15.5 14.3 14.3 12.7 12.4 12.4 12.1 12.1 11.7 11.8 11.4 11.1 11.1 9.5 9.1 9.1 8.8 8.8 7.7 5.8 4.7 2.6 2.6 Table C.3: continued. Filter Site Observer Reference -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP SuperWASP -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) 15 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Table C.3: continued. N 132 133 Epoch 2012-04-29 2012-06-06 Np 59 58 ∆ (AU) 1.93 2.07 r (AU) 2.94 2.93 ϕ (◦) 2.6 12.6 Filter Site Observer Reference -- -- SuperWASP SuperWASP -- -- Grice et al. (2017) Grice et al. (2017) Notes. MDO -- McDonald Observatory, KPNO -- Kitt Peak National Observatory, 91cm or 41 telescopes. STEW -- Steward 51-cm Observatory, CMC -- Carlsberg Meridian Circle at La Palma, HLO -- Hoher List Observatory, vH-G&vH -- van Houten-Groeneveld, van Houten. 16 J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Table C.2: List of disk-resolved images. For each observation the table gives the epoch, the telescope/instrument, the photometric filter, the exposure time, the airmass, the distance to the Earth ∆ and the Sun r, the phase angle α, the angular diameter Da, and the reference or the ID of the AO project. Date UT Instrument Filter 2002-08-05 2002-08-05 2002-08-05 2002-08-05 2002-08-05 2002-09-27 2002-12-29 2005-07-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2006-11-17 2009-08-16 2009-08-16 2010-12-13 2010-12-13 2010-12-14 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-10 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 2017-10-11 J H Kp Kp H Kp H Kp K H J Kp H J Kp H J PK50_1.5 PK50_1.5 - - - 14:42:06 Keck/NIRC2 14:45:29 Keck/NIRC2 14:48:25 Keck/NIRC2 15:11:44 Keck/NIRC2 15:14:34 Keck/NIRC2 09:54:15 Keck/NIRC2 04:35:18 Keck/NIRC2 07:53:59 Keck/NIRC2 07:06:23 Keck/NIRC2 07:13:20 Keck/NIRC2 07:18:58 Keck/NIRC2 07:53:59 Keck/NIRC2 07:57:52 Keck/NIRC2 08:02:23 Keck/NIRC2 08:24:30 Keck/NIRC2 08:27:22 Keck/NIRC2 08:30:57 Keck/NIRC2 07:50:06 Keck/NIRC2 08:15:57 Keck/NIRC2 06:05:38 VLT/NaCo 06:55:02 VLT/NaCo 05:24:30 VLT/NaCo 3:56:12 VLT/SPHERE N_R 3:57:22 VLT/SPHERE N_R 3:58:33 VLT/SPHERE N_R 3:59:43 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:00:55 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:07:50 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:09:01 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:10:12 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:11:22 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:12:32 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:40:41 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:41:53 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:43:05 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:44:16 VLT/SPHERE N_R 4:45:26 VLT/SPHERE N_R 5:34:41 VLT/SPHERE N_R 5:35:52 VLT/SPHERE N_R 5:37:04 VLT/SPHERE N_R 5:38:15 VLT/SPHERE N_R 5:39:25 VLT/SPHERE N_R 6:28:33 VLT/SPHERE N_R 6:29:45 VLT/SPHERE N_R 6:30:57 VLT/SPHERE N_R 6:32:07 VLT/SPHERE N_R 6:33:18 VLT/SPHERE N_R Exp Airmass (s) 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 18 34 48 0.2 0.2 4 2 0.1 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 60 30 1 1 1 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 1.43 1.45 1.47 1.63 1.66 1.29 1.13 1.37 1.26 1.24 1.22 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.32 1.36 1.49 1.33 1.69 1.74 1.73 1.73 1.72 1.72 1.68 1.68 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.55 1.55 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 ∆ (AU) 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.14 1.88 2.01 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.70 1.70 1.29 1.29 1.28 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 r (AU) 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.03 1.87 2.78 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 2.48 2.48 2.06 2.06 2.06 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 α (◦) 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 17.5 30.4 16.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 18.1 18.1 21.7 21.7 21.4 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Reference or ID Da ((cid:48)(cid:48)) 0.245 N10N2 0.245 N10N2 0.245 N10N2 0.245 N10N2 0.245 N10N2 0.260 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.158 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.147 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.349 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.174 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.174 Viikinkoski et al. (2017) 0.230 0.230 0.232 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.333 086.C-0785 086.C-0785 086.C-0785 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 199.C-0074 17 Table C.4: Mass estimates (M) of (7) Iris from the literature. For each, the 1 σ uncertainty, method, and bibliographic reference are listed. The methods are defl: Deflection, ephem: Ephemeris. J. Hanuš et al.: Asteroid (7) Iris seen by VLT/SPHERE/ZIMPOL Mass (M) (kg) (3.98 ± 1.79) × 1019 (11.90 ± 1.99) × 1018 (2.80 ± 0.28) × 1019 (2.80 ± 0.28) × 1019 (10.30 ± 1.59) × 1018 (1.25 ± 0.06) × 1019 (1.79 ± 0.20) × 1019 (1.36 ± 0.10) × 1019 (4.77 ± 0.60) × 1019 (1.15 ± 0.02) × 1019 (11.90 ± 1.29) × 1018 (6.56 ± 1.59) × 1018 (1.62 ± 0.09) × 1019 (11.00 ± 2.63) × 1018 (1.75 ± 0.29) × 1019 (1.72 ± 0.16) × 1019 (1.68 ± 0.16) × 1019 (2.33 ± 0.31) × 1019 (11.30 ± 0.80) × 1018 (12.50 ± 1.21) × 1018 (14.80 ± 1.65) × 1018 (1.30 ± 0.06) × 1019 (11.60 ± 0.97) × 1018 (1.39 ± 0.04) × 1019 (1.39 ± 0.06) × 1019 (10.10 ± 0.56) × 1018 4.18+4.62−1.39 × 1018 (1.65 ± 0.09) × 1019 (1.67 ± 0.12) × 1019 (7.24 ± 0.57) × 1018 (13.75 ± 1.30) × 1018 Method Reference defl defl defl defl defl ephem ephem defl defl ephem ephem ephem defl ephem defl defl defl defl ephem ephem ephem ephem ephem defl defl ephem defl ephem ephem ephem Vasiliev & Yagudina (1999) Krasinsky et al. (2001) Chernetenko & Kochetova (2002) Kochetova (2004) Pitjeva (2004) Pitjeva (2005) Aslan et al. (2007) Baer et al. (2008) Ivantsov (2008) Fienga et al. (2008) Folkner et al. (2009) Pitjeva (2010) Baer et al. (2011) Konopliv et al. (2011) Zielenbach (2011) Zielenbach (2011) Zielenbach (2011) Zielenbach (2011) Fienga et al. (2011) Fienga et al. (2013) Kuchynka & Folkner (2013) Pitjeva (2013) Fienga et al. (2014) Goffin (2014) Kochetova & Chernetenko (2014) Viswanathan et al. (2017) Siltala & Granvik (2017) Baer & Chesley (2017) Baer & Chesley (2017) Fienga (2018) Median (1σ uncertainty) # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 18
1801.05424	1	1801	2018-01-16T19:00:00	HD 104860 and HD 192758: two debris disks newly imaged in scattered-light with HST	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We present the first scattered-light images of two debris disks around the F8 star HD 104860 and the F0V star HD 192758, respectively $\sim45$ and $\sim67$ pc away. We detected these systems in the F110W and F160W filters through our re-analysis of archival Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS data with modern starlight subtraction techniques. Our image of HD 104860 confirms the morphology previously observed by Herschel in thermal emission with a well-defined ring at radius $\sim114$ au inclined $\sim58$ degrees. Although the outer edge profile is consistent with dynamical evolution models, the sharp inner edge suggests sculpting by unseen perturbers. Our images of HD 192758 reveal a disk at radius $\sim95$ au inclined by $\sim59$ degrees, never resolved so far. These disks have low scattering albedos of 10% and 13% respectively, inconsistent with water ice grain compositions. They are reminiscent of several other disks with similar inclination and scattering albedos: Fomalhaut, HD 92945, HD 202628, and HD 207129. They are also very distinct from brighter disks in the same inclination bin, which point to different compositions between these two populations. Varying scattering albedo values can be explained by different grain porosities, chemical compositions, or grain size distributions, which may indicate distinct formation mechanisms or dynamical processes at work in these systems. Finally, these faint disks with large infrared excesses may be representative of an underlying population of systems with low albedo values. Searches with more sensitive instruments on HST or on the James Webb Space Telescope and using state-of-the art starlight-subtraction methods may help discover more of such faint systems.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version June 8, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 HD 104860 AND HD 192758: TWO DEBRIS DISKS NEWLY IMAGED IN SCATTERED-LIGHT WITH HST ´E. Choquet,1, 2, ∗ G. Bryden,2 M. D. Perrin,3 R. Soummer,3 J.-C. Augereau,4 C. H. Chen,3 J. H. Debes,3 E. Gofas-Salas,5, 6 J. B. Hagan,3 D. C. Hines,3 D. Mawet,1, 2 F. Morales,2 L. Pueyo,3 A. Rajan,3 B. Ren,7 G. Schneider,8 C. C. Stark,3 and S. Wolff9 8 1 0 2 n a J 6 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 4 2 4 5 0 . 1 0 8 1 : v i X r a 1Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 3Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore MD 21218, USA 4Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, 38000 Grenoble, France 5ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab, 92322 Chatillon, France 6Institut de la Vision, 75012 Paris, France 7Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 8Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 9Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands (Received 2017 December 16; Revised 2018 January 13; Accepted 2018 January 15) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We present the first scattered-light images of two debris disks around the F8 star HD 104860 and the F0V star HD 192758, respectively ∼ 45 and ∼ 67 pc away. We detected these systems in the F110W and F160W filters through our re-analysis of archival Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS data with modern starlight subtraction techniques. Our image of HD 104860 confirms the morphology previously observed by Herschel in thermal emission with a well-defined ring at radius ∼ 114 au inclined ∼ 58◦. Although the outer edge profile is consistent with dynamical evolution models, the sharp inner edge suggests sculpting by unseen perturbers. Our images of HD 192758 reveal a disk at radius ∼ 95 au inclined by ∼ 59◦, never resolved so far. These disks have low scattering albedos of 10% and 13% respectively, inconsistent with water ice grain compositions. They are reminiscent of several other disks with similar inclination and scattering albedos: Fomalhaut, HD 92945, HD 202628, and HD 207129. They are also very distinct from brighter disks in the same inclination bin, which point to different compositions between these two populations. Varying scattering albedo values can be explained by different grain porosities, chemical compositions, or grain size distributions, which may indicate distinct formation mechanisms or dynamical processes at work in these systems. Finally, these faint disks with large infrared excesses may be representative of an underlying population of systems with low albedo values. Searches with more sensitive instruments on HST or on the James Webb Space Telescope and using state-of-the art starlight-subtraction methods may help discover more of such faint systems. Keywords: Circumstellar matter, techniques: image processing, stars: individual (HD 104860, HD 192758) Corresponding author: ´E. Choquet [email protected] ∗ Hubble Fellow 2 Choquet et al. 1. INTRODUCTION Debris disks are extrasolar system components evolv- ing around main-sequence stars. They are composed of kilometer-sized planetesimals formed during the earlier protoplanetary stage of the system, and of dust parti- cles generated by colliding bodies through a destructive grinding cascade stirred by secular perturbations from planets or large planetesimals (see Wyatt 2008, for a review). About five hundreds debris disk systems have been identified around nearby stars from their photo- metric excess in the infrared (Eiroa et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014; Patel et al. 2017), revealing that massive dust systems are as common as 20 to 26% around A to K type stars in the solar neighborhood (Thureau et al. 2014; Montesinos et al. 2016). Debris disks are the perfect laboratories to study the dynamical balance ruling circumstellar environments. Particles of different sizes, masses, and distances from their host stars are affected differently by the stellar radiation, wind, gravity, and by perturbing bodies like sub-stellar companions (Krivov 2010). Gravity is the dominant force for planetesimals and millimeter-sized grains, which orbit close to their parent bodies. Small particles, having a large cross-section compared to their volume, are on the other hand very sensitive to the ra- diative pressure and drag forces, and spread both inward and outward from their parent bodies on eccentric or- bits. The smallest particles (sub-micron size) are blown out of the system by the stellar radiative pressure, re- sulting in an abrupt cut-off to the size distribution in debris disks and to their slow mass-decay with time. Resolved images of debris disks in several wavelength regimes provide ideal probes to study dynamics in cir- cumstellar environments. Images reveal the disks mor- phology and the spatial distribution of their dust, and multi-wavelength imagery additionally traces particles of different sizes. As millimeter-sized grains are the most efficient emitters at long wavelengths, far-IR/millimeter images map the spatial distribution of large grains ther- mal emission, and, indirectly, the location of their plan- etesimals parent bodies (e.g. Booth et al. 2016, 2017). Micron-sized particles are inefficient emitters, but effi- ciently scatter the starlight at wavelengths comparable to their size. Near-infrared and visible-light imaging thus shows how small dust grains spread out in debris disk systems (e.g. Schneider et al. 2014). By characteriz- ing the dust spatial and size distribution, multi-spectral imaging enables us to study the dynamical balance in disks as a function on the stellar environment (e.g. Mac- Gregor et al. 2017). Furthermore, resolved images let us study possible planet disk interactions by characteriz- ing the imprints of unseen planets on disks morphologies Figure 1. Age and spectral type distribution of the 500 stars within 700 pc with a debris disk detected in thermal emission by the Spitzer Space telescope (grey empty circles Chen et al. 2014), and/or that have been resolved in thermal emission (grey filled circles, 97 systems) or in scattered-light (blue markers, 41 systems). The blue stars highlight the debris disks firstly imaged by ALICE in scattered-light. We note that the Spitzer sample is composed at 94% of stars within 250 pc, with only a few systems beyond 500 pc. (Lee & Chiang 2016). Giant gaseous planets, although rare at 10 -- 100 au, are more commonly found in systems harboring massive debris disks (Meshkat et al. 2017). About a hundred debris disks have been spatially resolved to date, mostly in thermal emission at 70 -- 160 µm with the Herschel Space Observatory (e.g. Booth et al. 2013; Eiroa et al. 2013; Matthews et al. 2014; Morales et al. 2016; Vican et al. 2016) or at submillime- ter/millimeter wavelengths with JCMT (Holland et al. 2017) and ALMA (e.g. MacGregor et al. 2013, 2016a; Su et al. 2017). Using the measured radii of a sam- ple of Herschel -resolved disks, Pawellek et al. (2014) in- terestingly showed that the typical grain size in these disks does not directly scale with the radiative pressure blowout particle size, but decreases with stellar lumi- nosity. This may indicate that other mechanisms are at work in debris disks that limit the production of small grains around late stars, or that induce a higher level of excitation and planetesimal stirring around early stars (Pawellek & Krivov 2015). Such hypotheses could be tested by studying the small dust population in debris disks with scattered- light imaging. However, about 40 debris disks have been ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●★★★★★★★★★★★○Unresolved,SpitzerIRexcess●ResolvedinThermalemission●Resolvedinscattered-light★ResolvedbyALICEM5K5G5F5A5B5101001000104105SpectralTypeAge(Myr)DebrisDiskswithin700pcDebris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 3 resolved so far in scattered-light, and only half of these have also been resolved in thermal emission (see Fig. 1). Resolving disks in this wavelength-regime is technically challenging, as the star is typically 1000 times brighter than the total disk emission at these wavelengths, and the disks, typically within a few arcseconds of their host star, are buried within the bright and temporally vary- ing diffraction pattern. In this paper we report the detection of two new debris disks in the scattered-light regime. They were identified through our re-analysis of archival coronagraphic data from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) NICMOS in- strument as part of the Archival Legacy Investigation of Circumstellar Environments (ALICE) project1, us- ing modern starlight-subtraction techniques to reveal the faint disk emissions. The disk around HD 104860 has been previously resolved in thermal emission with Herschel-PACS at 100 and 160 µm (Morales et al. 2013, 2016), and the other, around HD 192758, has not been resolved so far. These two new detections bring the num- ber of debris disks firstly imaged in scattered-light by the ALICE program to 11, demonstrating the efficacy of our post-processing method to detect faint resolved circumstellar material (Soummer et al. 2014; Choquet et al. 2016, 2017). Along with the 5 debris disk de- tected during its operational time, NICMOS currently holds the record of the most debris disks firstly imaged in scattered-light. In Sec. 2, we present the datasets used for this work and the data reduction process. Section 3 presents the two systems HD 104860 and HD 192758 and describes the debris disk detections. We present our analysis of the disk morphologies in Sec. 4. 2. DATASETS AND DATA PROCESSING 2.1. Datasets The data on HD 104860 and HD 192758 were ob- tained as part of two surveys with the near-IR NIC- MOS instrument on HST that aimed at resolving a selec- tion of debris disks identified from their infrared excess, respectively with the Spitzer Space Telescope (HST- GO-10527, PI: D. Hines) and with IRAS/Hipparcos (HST-GO-11157, PI: J. Rhee). The data were all ob- tained with the intermediate-sampling camera NIC2 (0.(cid:48)(cid:48)07565 pixel−1) and with its coronagraphic mode fea- turing a 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)3-radius occulting mask. HD 104860 was observed in two telescope orientations, with the spacecraft rolled by 30◦ to enable subtrac- tion of the coronagraphic Point Spread Function (PSF) through roll differential imaging (Lowrance et al. 1999). HD 192758 was also observed in two 30◦-different rolls on 2007-07-03, then again in two other rolls about a year later (UT-2008-06-04). However, the guide star ac- quisition failed during one roll of the later observing se- quence, and none of the integrations within this roll were acquired with the star centered on the occulting spot. We only used exposures from the three successful roll ac- quisitions in our study, and we combined data from both epochs to maximize the signal to noise ratio (S/N) on the detection, as we do not expect significant temporal variations in the disk morphology and photometry. HD 104860 was observed with the NICMOS F110W filter, and HD 192758 with both the F110W and F160W filters. These two wide-band filters were the most com- monly used for NICMOS coronagraphic observations, which facilitated assembling large and homogeneous PSF libraries for advanced post-processing (Hagan et al. 2018). The F160W NICMOS filter (pivot wavelength 1.600 µm, 98%-integrated bandwidth 0.410 µm) is com- parable to the ground-based H bandpass, while NIC- MOS F110W filter (pivot wavelength 1.116 µm, 98%- integrated bandwidth 0.584 µm) is twice as extended toward shorter wavelengths as the J band. The observing parameters and instrument charac- teristics of the three datasets (HD 104860-F110W, HD 192758-F110W, and HD 192758-F160W) are sum- marized in Table 1. 2.2. Data Processing To detect the faint signal of the disks compared to the star, we used the multi-reference star differential imag- ing (MRDI) PSF-subtraction method developed for the ALICE program (Soummer et al. 2011; Choquet et al. 2014). We assembled and registered large and homoge- neous libraries of coronagraphic images from the NIC- MOS archive, gathering images from multiple reference stars observed as part of several HST programs. These libraries were used to subtract the star PSF from each exposure of the science target with the Principal Compo- nent Analysis (PCA) KLIP algorithm (Soummer et al. 2012). All the images used to process the HD 104860 dataset (PSF library and science images) were calibrated with contemporary flat-field images and observed dark frames as part of the Legacy Archive PSF Library and Cir- cumstellar Environments (LAPLACE) program2. Con- versely, HD 192758's data were obtained in HST cycle 16, last operational cycle of NICMOS, and were not included in the LAPLACE calibration program. To 1 https://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/alice/ 2 https://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/laplace 4 Choquet et al. Table 1. Observing and processing parameters Table 2. System properties Parameters HD 104860 HD 192758 HD 192758 Properties HD 104860 HD 192758 UT date 2006-03-20 DEC (J2000) +66 20 11.715 (F110W) (F110W) (F160W) RA (J2000) 12 04 33.731 # orientations Orient difference (◦) Filter λp (µm) Fν (µJy.s.DN−1) # combined frames Total exp. time (s) # frames PSF library # subtracted PCs Image crop size (pix.) Mask radius (pix.) 2007-07-03 2008-06-04 3 30; 2; 28 2 30 F110W F110W F160W 1.116 1.116 1.600 1.21121 1.21121 1.49585 18 5183 439 141 140 13 15 3456 327 130 80 8 15 3456 277 80 80 8 have libraries large enough to sample the PSF vari- ations as well as representative of HD 192758's im- ages, we assembled PSF libraries both from LAPLACE programs and from the non-LAPLACE HST-GO-11157 program. The later was processed with the NICMOS calnica calibration pipeline and bad pixel corrected. For HD 104860's and HD 192758's datasets, we respectively down-selected the 60% and the 30% of the images in the libraries the most correlated with their respective science frames. This selective criterion ensures that the images in the libraries are well representative of the star PSF in each science frames (Choquet et al. 2014), and minimizes over-subtraction of the astrophysical signal, especially in the case of extended objects which project more strongly on poorly-matched PSF components with PCA-type algorithms. We applied the KLIP algorithm on the cropped sub- images of the science target excluding a central circu- lar area. The numbers of principal components (PCs) used for the PSF subtraction were selected to maximize the S/N on the disks after visual inspection of the final images. The PSF-subtracted exposures were then ro- tated to have North pointing up, co-added, and scaled to surface brightness units based on the exposure time, HST's calibrated photometric factors (Fν), and plate scale. The post-processing parameters (crop size, mask 20 18 15.790 -42 51 36.297 F0V 6.387 (1) 6.298 (1) 67 ± 2 (2) 51.65 ± 0.07 (2) −57.9 ± 0.4 (2) 45 -- 830 (5,6) F8 6.822 (1) 6.580 (1) 45.0 ± 0.5 (2) −57.07 ± 0.06 (2) 43.7 ± 0.3 (2) 19 -- 635 (3,4) Spectral Type J (mag) H (mag) Distance (pc) PM RA ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) PM DEC ((cid:48)(cid:48)/yr) Age (Myr) Association Ldust/L(cid:63) Field (4) Field / ICS 2391 (5,6) 5.7 × 10−4 (7) 6.3 × 10−4 (3) References -- 1: Cutri et al. 2003; 2: Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016; 3: Hillenbrand et al. 2008; 4: Brandt et al. 2014; 5: Mo´or et al. 2006; 6: Chen et al. 2014; 7: Mo´or et al. 2011. radius, PSF library size, number of PCs) are listed in Table 1. To estimate the noise in the final images, we processed the reference star images from the PSF libraries with the same method and reduction parameters as the science images. The PSF-subtracted libraries were then parti- tioned into sets with the same number of frames as the science targets, rotated with the target image orienta- tions, and combined. The noise maps were computed from the pixel-wise standard deviation across these sets of processed reference star images. 3. DISK DETECTIONS We detect faint and resolved dust emission around both stars. Fig. 2 presents the images of the two disks and their respective S/N maps. We list some properties of the two systems in Table 2. 3.1. HD 104860 HD 104860 is a F8 field star at 45.0 ± 0.5 pc (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016). Its age was estimated, based on its chromospheric activity, to 32 Myr by Hillenbrand et al. (2008), and to 19 -- 635 Myr by Brandt et al. (2014). The system has a significant infrared excess at 70 µm identified with Spitzer with fractional infrared luminos- ity of Ldust/L(cid:63) ∼ 6.3 × 10−4 (Hillenbrand et al. 2008). Its SED is well-described by a two-temperature black- body model, with a warm dust population at 210± 27 K with a fractional luminosity of 2.4×10−5 and a cold dust Debris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 5 Figure 2. Debris disks detected around HD 104860 (F110W filter) and HD 192758 (F110W and F160W filters) by re-analyzing archival HST-NICMOS data as part of the ALICE program, using libraries built of multiple reference star images from the NICMOS archive and using the PCA-KLIP algorithm. The top row shows the disks combined images in surface brightness units, and the bottom row shows the S/N maps. All images have been smoothed by convolution with a synthetic PSF. The white dashed circles show the area masked for post-processing with KLIP. population at 42±5 K with a large infrared fractional lu- minosity of 2.8× 10−4 (Chen et al. 2014). Without prior on the dust separation to the star and assuming that the disks are in radiative and collisional equilibrium, these black-body emissions correspond respectively to a ∼ 10−5 MM oon-mass disk at a radius of 3 au from the star, and to a massive ∼ 1.5 MM oon cold disk at a radius of 366 au, based on silicate spherical grain compositions. By measuring the cold disk spectral index in the millime- ter from VLA and ATCA observations, MacGregor et al. (2016b) estimated a dust size distribution in the system with a power law q = 3.64± 0.15, consistent with steady state collisional cascade models (Dohnanyi 1969; Pan & Schlichting 2012; G´asp´ar et al. 2012). Assuming a disk The disk was first resolved in thermal emission at 100 and 160 µm with Herschel -PACS (Morales et al. 2013) then marginally resolved at 1.3 mm with CARMA (Steele et al. 2016). The Herschel image at 100 µm shows a disk of radius 116 ± 6 au, three times smaller than the radius inferred from SED modeling, and in- clined by 54 ± 7◦from face-on with a position angle of 1 ± 7◦. Such a significant difference in radius between composed of astro-silicates (Draine 2003), a stellar lu- minosity of L(cid:63) = 1.16 L(cid:12) and mass of M(cid:63) = 1.04 M(cid:12), the radiative pressure blowout grain size limit is esti- mated to ablow ∼ 0.4 µm, but the minimum grain size is inferred to ∼ 7 µm from joint modeling of the system's SED and Herschel images (Pawellek et al. 2014). 1.''67.AUNEHD192758,F160WS/NALICEprogramS/N01234561.''67.AUNEHD192758,F160WALICEprogramSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-200204060801.''67.AUNEHD192758,F110WS/NALICEprogramS/N01234561.''67.AUNEHD192758,F110WALICEprogramSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-200204060802.''90.AUNEHD104860,F110WS/NALICEprogramS/N012342.''90.AUNEHD104860,F110WALICEprogramSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-10-5051015206 Choquet et al. observations and SED-modeling is found for many re- solved systems and stresses the need for resolved images to put constraints on debris disks properties. Using the radius inferred from the Herschel image to constrain SED modeling, Morales et al. (2016) found that both pure astro-silicate grains and a mixture of water ice and astro-silicates could compose the dust in the system. In our F110W NICMOS image, we detect a large ring- shape debris disk around HD 104860 with a radius of ∼ 112 au (∼ 2.5(cid:48)(cid:48)), inclined by ∼ 60◦ from face-on. The disk is detected at S/N ∼ 2 -- 4 per pixel and S/N ∼ 15 integrated over the disk area detected above 1.5σ. This detection enables us to put strong constraints on the disk general morphology (see Sec. 4), but the S/N is too low to reliably comment on the sub-structures within the disk. The observed morphology largely agrees with the Herschel thermal emission image, with a 60 times better angular resolution (95 mas vs. 5.9(cid:48)(cid:48)resolution), and provides the first image of the dust in the scattered- light regime. The East side is significantly brighter than the West side, indicative of anisotropic scattering from the dust, and showing the near-side of the disk assum- ing grains preferentially forward-scattering. Our image unambiguously reveals a cleared cavity from the disk's inner edge and down to ∼ 45 au from the star, which we further characterize in Sec. 4. We detect a bright point source ∼ 3.5(cid:48)(cid:48) North-West from the star. We report its astrometry in Table 3. We identify it as candidate #1 detected in Metchev & Hillenbrand (2009), and we confirm that its astrometry is consistent with a background star, as noted by the authors. We note that this object is wrongly reported as a binary companion in the Washington Double Star catalog (WDS 12046+6620AB). To further confirm the background nature of this point source, we re-processed a Keck-NIRC2 archival dataset acquired on UT-2013-01- 27 using the K' filter (program N117N2, PI: F. Morales). After standard processing and registration steps, we de- tect the point source using the classical Angular Dif- ferential Imaging (Marois et al. 2006) PSF-subtraction method. We report the measured astrometry of the point source relative to HD 104860 in Table 3. The point source indeed follows the background track between the three epochs, although we note a significant shift be- tween the measured position and the background-track- predicted astrometry over the 11-year baseline that is likely due to the background star's own proper motion (see Fig. 3). 3.2. HD 192758 HD 192758 is a F0V star at 67 ± 2 pc (Gaia Collab- oration et al. 2016). Mo´or et al. (2006) reported a 50% Figure 3. Astrometry of the point source relative to HD 104860, measured with Palomar-P1640 on 2002-06-23 (green) from Metchev & Hillenbrand (2009), HST-NICMOS on 2006-03-20 (orange), and Keck-NIRC2 on 2013-01-27 (blue). The black line shows the relative motion of a fix back- ground object from the point source position at epoch 2013- 01-27. The empty circles indicate the predicted background position at the corresponding epoch. The point source mea- sured astrometry follows the background track and is not co-moving with HD 104860. Table 3. HD 104860 Point source Astrometry around Epoch Separation ((cid:48)(cid:48)) Ref. P.A. (◦) (UT date) 2002-06-23 2006-03-20 2013-01-27 3.803 ± 0.027 −72.99 ± 0.28 −75.6 ± 1.2 −80.2 ± 0.2 3.50 ± 0.08 3.14 ± 0.01 1 2 2 References -- 1: Metchev & Hillenbrand 2009; 2: This work. probability for the star to be a member of the IC 2391 supercluster, of age 50 ± 5 Myr (Barrado y Navascu´es et al. 2004). On the other hand, Chen et al. (2014) found the system to be a field star of isochronal age ∼ 830 Myr. The system has a fractional infrared ex- cess around 100 µm with Ldust/L(cid:63) ∼ 5.6 × 10−4 (Mo´or et al. 2006). It is well modeled by a two-temperature black-body emission, with a warm disk at 164 ± 7 K with a fractional luminosity of ∼ 0.38 × 10−4 and a ●●◦◦●●◦◦●●Backgroundmotion●2002-06-23●2006-03-20●2013-01-27-3.-3.2-3.4-3.6-3.80.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.2Δα(arcsec)Δδ(arcsec)BackgroundstarnearHD104860Debris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 7 cold dust belt at 54 ± 6 K with a fractional luminos- ity of ∼ 4.1 × 10−4 (Chen et al. 2014). Assuming disks in radiative and collisional equilibrium and composed of silicate spherical spheres, these black-body emission cor- responds to dust belts of mass ∼ 1.3× 10−4 MM oon and ∼ 8.7 × 10−1 MM oon, respectively, and at radii ∼ 6 au and ∼ 152 au, respectively. We spatially resolve the outer disk in HD 192758 In the in both the F110W and the F160W datasets. F110W image, the disk is detected up to S/N∼ 6 per pixel, and S/N ∼ 45 integrated over the pixels above In F160W, the detection is found with S/N up 1.5σ. to ∼ 4 per pixel, with S/N ∼ 21 integrated over the disk area above 1.5σ. The disk presents a similar mor- phology in the two images. They both reveal a disk of radius ∼ 100 au (∼ 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)5) and inclined by ∼ 60◦from face- on. As for HD 104860, the disk radius is significantly smaller than the disk radius estimated from SED mod- eling, which stresses again the need for imaging to put reliable constraints on disk properties. The South side of the disk is not detected, which also indicates anisotropic scattering by the dust grains, presumably showing the near-side of the disk North of the star. 4. DISK MODELING PSF subtraction with algorithms that solve the least- square problem of minimizing the residuals between the science image and a set of eigen-images systematically involves some level of over-subtraction of circumstellar materials, along with the PSF (Lafreni`ere et al. 2007; Soummer et al. 2012; Pueyo 2016). This effect biases both the morphology and the photometry of circum- stellar sources, and the effect depends on the shape of the source and of the reduction parameters. For ex- tended objects in ALICE-processed NICMOS data, the algorithm throughput typically ranges from 20% at 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)5 from the star to 80% at large separations, in the case of a face-on ring-like disk. Calibrating the effect of the algorithm throughput is critical to properly characterize the morphology of ex- tended sources, and to estimate their unbiased surface brightness. This is even more essential for inclined de- bris disks seen in scattered-light, since the algorithm throughput is lowest at short separations, along inclined disks' semi-minor axis where the effect of anisotropic scattering is the strongest (Hedman & Stark 2015; Per- rin et al. 2015; Milli et al. 2017a). Accounting for the post-processing throughput is thus required to accu- rately map a disk surface brightness distribution, mea- sure its scattering phase function and flux density, and put constraints on its scattering properties. In this section, we describe the parametric modeling used to constrain the disk morphologies, the forward modeling method used to calibrate the post-processing throughput, and the models that best fit the disks de- tected around HD 104860 and HD 192758. 4.1. Forward modeling method Assuming that the morphology of the astrophysical source is known, the post-processing throughput can be inferred though forward modeling. To constrain the morphology and photometry of the disks detected around HD 104860 and HD 192758, we used the same methodology as in Choquet et al. (2016), using para- metric modeling and the analytical forward modeling method (valid with PCA-type algorithms, Soummer et al. 2012; Pueyo 2016). This method consists in sub- tracting from the source's model its projection on the eigen-vectors used to process the data. We generated a grid of disk models with a set of free parameters that we wish to constrain, and convolved each model by a synthetic unocculted NICMOS PSF generated in the corresponding filter with the Tiny TIM package (Krist et al. 2011). From each model, we then subtracted its projection on the same eigen-vectors as used for the science data, intrinsically using the same re- duction zone and number of PCs. This process removes from the raw input model the part over-subtracted dur- ing post-processing, and reveals the (hereafter) forward model. We then rotated and combined these forward models with the same parameters and angles as the sci- ence images, and we scaled the resulting model to the total flux of the disk in the science image. Each forward model is then directly compared to the disk image. We used the GRaTer radiative transfer code to cre- ate the disk models (Augereau et al. 1999b; Lebreton et al. 2012). This code computes optically thin centro- symmetric disk models assuming a Henyey & Green- stein (1941) scattering phase function of asymmetric parameter g. The dust density distribution n(r, z) is parametrized with a radial profile R(r) falling off with power laws αin and αout inward and outward from a parent belt at radius R0, and with a Gaussian vertical density Z(r, z) profile with a scale height ζ(r) rising lin- early with an aspect ratio h: n(r, z) ∝ R(r)Z(r, z), with: R(r) = (cid:32)(cid:18) r (cid:19)−2αin R0 (cid:18) r R0 + (cid:19)−2αout(cid:33)−1/2 (1) (2) 8 Z(r, z) = exp (cid:19)2(cid:33) (cid:32) − (cid:18) z ζ(r) ζ(r) = hr The disk center relative to the star's position is parametrized by offsets du and dv in the disk plane, with du along the major axis (unaffected by projections effect), and dv along the perpendicular axis (appearing projected along the disk's minor axis). The model image is simulated with a position angle (PA) parametrized by θ, and inclination i. Given the geometry of the two systems, the vertical scale heights of the disks are not properly constrained by our data. We fix the aspect ratio to h = 0.05, a reasonable thickening assumption for unperturbed debris disks due to the combined ac- tion of radiation pressure and grains mutual collisions (Th´ebault 2009). Furthermore, given the inclinations of the disks, a Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase func- tion (SPF) model will describe the surface brightness variations in the disks over a range of scattering angles limited by the disk inclinations, but may not properly describe the actual SPF over all angles (see Hedman & Stark 2015). We estimated the goodness of fit of our models to the disk image by computing the reduced chi square χ2 red value over a large area encompassing the disk in the im- age. After identifying the best model within the grid, we refine the best-fit parameters by interpolating the reduced chi square values around the best model in the grid, independently for each parameter. The best chi square values are larger than 1 because the noise maps are overall slightly underestimated, although very repre- sentative of the noise spatial distribution (e.g. the noise signature from spider residuals). To estimated the un- certainties on the model parameters, we thus normalize the chi square by its best value, assuming that the noise underestimation is common to all pixels. We then esti- mated the uncertainty on each parameter assuming that our estimator follows a chi-squared distribution, from the values at which the interpolated χ2 red increased by 1σ =(cid:112)2/Ndof from 1, with Ndof the number of degrees of freedom in the fit. 4.2. HD 104860 analysis For HD 104860, we generated a grid of 546875 models with 8 free parameters to constrain its morphology. Ta- ble 4 describes the simulated parameter ranges and best fit values. The goodness of fit of each parameter is also presented in Fig. 4. The data were fit within an elliptical area of semi-major axis 4.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 oriented North-South and semi-minor axis 2.(cid:48)(cid:48)6, excluding the central area masked Choquet et al. (3) (4) Table 4. Parameter grid and best model for HD 104860 Param. Min. Max. Nval Best Model Best Model R0 (au) g θ (◦) i (◦) αin αout 106 0.0 -5 52 2 -6 du (au) -10 122 0.4 7 64 10 -2 10 10 dv (au) ··· χ2 aShows 1σ uncertainties. -20 ··· red (in grid) 114 0.2 1 58 10 -4 0 -5 1.833 (interpolated)a 114 ± 6 0.17 ± 0.13 1 ± 5 58 ± 5 ≥ 4.5 −3.9 ± 1.6 2 ± 7 −7 ± 13 1.826 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 ··· during post-processing, which resulted in Ndof = 5536 degrees of freedom in the fit. This area excludes the background star at ∼ 3.5(cid:48)(cid:48) from the star. The image of the best model and comparison to the NICMOS image and noise map are presented in Fig. 5 within the fit area. We find that the best fit to HD 104860's data is a disk of radius R0 = 114 ± 6 au, inclined by i = 58 ± 5◦ from face-on, with a position angle of θ = 1 ± 5◦ East of North. These values are consistent with the mor- phology of the disk observed at 100 µm and 160 µm by Morales et al. (2013). We find a relatively low value for the Henyey-Greenstein parameter of anisotropic scat- tering, with g = 0.17 ± 0.13 indicative of grains fa- voring forward scattering. This value is expected for a disk of moderate inclination such as HD 104860, which does not probe very small scattering angles (> 32◦): slightly forward scattering SPFs with Henyey- Greenstein parameter around g=0.1 -- 0.3 have been ob- served for many debris disks with similar or lower incli- nations (HD 92945, HD107146, HD 141569, HD207129, Fomalhaut Golimowski et al. 2011; Ardila et al. 2004; Mawet et al. 2017; Krist et al. 2010; Kalas et al. 2005). As mentioned before, this may not be representative of the scattering phase function at smaller scattering an- gles, as it was shown that, for some dust grains, it may significantly differ from a Henyey-Greenstein model and sharply peak at angles below 40◦ despite a relatively flat phase function at large angles (Hedman & Stark 2015; Milli et al. 2017a). Our analysis show that the disk has a ring shape with an asymmetric radial density profile. We find that the Debris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 9 onances (Wisdom 1980; Mustill & Wyatt 2012), while unperturbed systems have smoother inner edges filled by small grains due to Poyting-Robertson drag. We do not find significant offsets of the ring with respect to the star within ±7 au along the disk major axis, and within ±13 au projected on the minor axis, indicating that a planet responsible for carving the disk inner edge would have a low eccentricity. Using the best fit morphological parameter values, we de-project the NIMCOS image based on the disk inclina- tion, position angle, and offsets, and compute its radial and azimuthal average profiles (see Fig. 6). In the fol- lowing, we quantify the disk photometry using both the NICMOS image, which is affected by over-subtraction as shown in Fig. 5, and the best model before forward modeling, which is free of post-processing artifacts but is entirely model-dependent. In the NICMOS image, we measure a surface bright- ness on the disk spine of 11.7 ± 0.8 µJy/arcsec2 aver- aged over all scattering angles excluding 91 ± 23◦ and 271± 26◦, where stellar residuals from the telescope spi- der dominate the disk brightness. We find a correspond- ing average surface brightness of S = 17.8 µJy/arcsec2 in the best model unbiased by over-subtraction. The South ansae is ∼ 30% brighter than the North one in the NICMOS image (SS = 16 ± 6 µJy/arcsec2 and SN = 12 ± 5 µJy/arcsec2 respectively), but the asym- metry is not significant given our uncertainties. From the stellar flux (F(cid:63) = 3.1 Jy in the NICMOS F110W fil- ter), we estimate that the disk has a typical reflectance of R = S/F(cid:63) = (5.7 ± 0.3) × 10−6 arcsec−2, based on the mean surface brightness of the model. We estimate the disk flux density to Fscat = 200 ± 5 µJy, integrated in the best model over an elliptical surface of 20 arcsec2 with outer semi-major axis 3.(cid:48)(cid:48)9, inner semi-major axis 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)6, inner and outer semi-minor axis projected from the semi-major axis values by the best fit inclination cos(i), and with a position angle equal to the best fit value θ. The flux density integrated in the NICMOS image over the same surface is 92 ± 5 µJy, significantly af- fected by the post-processing throughput. Compared with the flux of the star, this correspond to a scattering efficiency of fscat = Fscat/F(cid:63) = (67 ± 2) × 10−6, based on the model's flux density. The scattering efficiency provides a measure of the dust scattering albedo ω knowing the total luminosity received by the grains (Krist et al. 2010; Golimowski et al. 2011): ω = fscat femit + fscat , (5) with femit = Ldust/L(cid:63) the disk infrared fractional lumi- nosity. The scattering albedo is an empirical quantity Figure 4. Goodness of fit for each parameter modeling the disk around HD 104860. The chi square values shown for each parameter value in the grid (empty circles) have all the other parameters fixed to their best values in the grid (filled circles). The χ2 is interpolated between each parame- ter value in the grid to refine the best fit values (filled trian- gles). The dashed green line shows the 1σ threshold used to estimate the uncertainties on the parameters, and the red- shaded areas show the parameters values ruled out by our modeling. disk outer edge follows a power law in αout = −3.9±1.6, corresponding to a surface density in rΓout with Γout = αout + 1 = −2.9 ± 1.6, assuming a scale height rising linearly with radius (Augereau et al. 1999b). This is consistent within our uncertainties with disk evolution models, which predict an outer surface density profile in Γout = −1.5 for small grains created under steady state collisions and set on eccentric orbits by radiative pres- sure, accumulating in the outskirts of their birth ring (Strubbe & Chiang 2006; Th´ebault & Wu 2008). We find that the disk inner edge is very sharp, with a lower limit of αin ≥ 4.5 on the inward power law of its radial density profile. Sharp inner edges in debris disk can be sculpted by planets orbiting within the disk, confining the dust out of a chaotic zone through mean motion res- ○○○○○○○●●▼▼-20-15-10-505100.981.001.021.041.061.081.10dvχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼-10-505100.981.001.021.041.061.081.10duχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼-6-5-4-3-20.981.001.021.041.061.081.10αoutχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼2468100.981.001.021.041.061.081.10αinχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼525456586062640.981.001.021.041.061.081.10iχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼-4-202460.981.001.021.041.061.081.10θχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼○Valuesingrid●Bestvalueingrid▼Bestvalueinterpolated0.00.10.20.30.40.981.001.021.041.061.081.10gχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○●●▼▼Interpolatedχ21σuncertaintylimit1101151200.981.001.021.041.061.081.10R0χ2red/Min(χ2red)HD 104860 fit 10 Choquet et al. Figure 5. Best model of the debris disk detected around HD 104860. The top row shows The best raw model convolved by a NICMOS PSF (left), the model affected by over-subtraction after forward modeling (middle), and the NICMOS image for comparison (right). The bottom row shows the residuals after subtracting the forward model from the NICMOS image (left), the absolute value of these residuals (middle), and the noise map for comparison (right). No disk structure is appearing in the residual map, indicating that the model properly fit the data. All images are displayed within the elliptical mask used for the fit, and have been smoothed by convolution with a synthetic PSF. The raw model was hence convolved twice with a synthetic PSF, once to account for the diffraction and once for smoothing and comparison with the other smoothed images. that provides a degenerate, wavelength-averaged com- bination of the grains albedo and of the disk scatter- ing phase function integrated over the scattering angles probed by the disk geometry. The true albedo of the dust can only be recovered with assumptions on the disk's SPF. Assuming that our scattering efficiency mea- surement integrates the light scattered by the grains re- sponsible for the thermal emission, and using the in- frared fractional luminosity of femit = 6.4 × 10−4 re- ported for the outer disk by Morales et al. (2016) (well- constrained from 24 µm to 1.3 mm photometry), we find a scattering albedo of ω = 9.5 ± 0.3%. We compared this value to the scattering albedo of grains with various compositions and porosities, com- puted under the Mie theory for a disk with the best-fit morphology found for HD 104860 in the F110W filter (Fig. 7). We find that our scattering albedo estimation rules out pure water ice composition and is consistent with dirty ice grains (Preibisch et al. 1993) larger than ∼ 3 µm in the case of compact grains, and larger than ∼ 1 µm in the case of 90% porous grains. Assuming compact grains, this is consistent with particles larger than the blowout size as suggested by Pawellek et al. (2014) for this disk (typical grain size of 7 µm, blowout size of 0.4 µm), although they used pure silicate grains in their study. Assuming 90% porous grains, the blowout size is 10 times larger than for compact grains which is consistent with our scattering albedo value. A few other debris disks, e.g. HD 181327 and HD 32297, are suspected to have porous grains (Lebreton et al. 2012; 2.''90.AUNENICMOSImageSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-10-505101520ForwardModelSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-10-505101520BestModelSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-10-505101520FitResidualsAbs[Residuals]NoiseMapDebris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 11 Figure 6. Radial and azimuthal profiles of HD 104860, mea- sured after de-projecting the disk from its inclination, posi- tion angle and offset from the star. Top: the blue and orange lines show the disk profile in the North and South ansae re- spectively. The green line show the radial profile averaged regardless of anisotropy of scattering over all azimuthal an- gles (excluding the angles around 90◦ and 270◦ delimited by the gray dashed lines in the bottom plot). All three profiles are affected by over-subtraction induced by post-processing. The red line shows the average radial profile measured in the best raw model, before forward modeling, and is repre- sentative of the disk surface brightness unaffected by over- subtraction artifacts. The dashed gray lines show the disks full-width at half-maximum. Bottom: Azimuthal profile of the disk average over the disk full-width at half-maximum (green line). The red line shows the average azimuthal pro- file of the best model before forward modeling, and corre- sponds to a Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase function of parameter g = 0.17. The dashed gray lines show azimuthal angles where the disk is dominated by PSF residuals, along the minor axis at 90◦ and 270◦. The 1σ uncertainties are computed accordingly from the noise map. Figure 7. Scattering albedo computed under the Mie the- ory as a function of grain size for a disk with HD 104860's best fit morphology, assuming different grain compositions: pure ice (blue), dirty ice (red), silicates (purple), and differ- ent porosities: compact grains (solid lines) and 90% porous grains (dashed lines). The measured scattering albedo for HD 104860 (black line) rules out water ice compositions and is consistent dirty ice grains larger than ∼ 2 µm. Donaldson et al. 2013). However, they are also much brighter than HD 104860, which may indicate also a different composition. 4.3. HD 192758 analysis For HD 192758 we generated a single grid of mod- els that we fit separately to the F110W and F160W images. It is indeed reasonable to assume a similar dust density distribution in both images but possibly different scattering properties at the two different wave- lengths (albedo, scattering phase function). We simu- lated 604800 models with 7 free parameters, fixing the offset along the disk minor-axis to dv = 0, as this pa- rameter is unconstrained by our data given the disk ge- ometry. We present the simulated parameter ranges and best fit values in Table 5 for both filters. The goodnesses of fit are presented jointly in Fig. 8. The shaded areas show better constraints on some parameters when com- bining the fits to both datasets. We computed the chi square values in an elliptical area of semi-major axis 2.(cid:48)(cid:48)6 oriented East-West, and semi-minor axis 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)9, and ex- cluding the central area masked during post-processing. The same area was used for both datasets, and corre- sponds to Ndof = 2525 degrees of freedom. We show in NorthansaeSouthansaeAzimuthalavg.Azimuthalavg.bestrawmodel012345-100102030Separation('')SurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)HD104860RadialProfileRadialavg.Radialavgbestrawmodel050100150200250300350-100102030AzimuthalAngle(º)SurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)HD104860AzimuthalProfile12 Choquet et al. Table 5. Parameter grid and best models for HD 192758 Param. Min. Max. Nval Best Model Best Model Best Model Best Model F110W F110W F160W F160W R0 (au) g θ (◦) i (◦) αin αout 81 0.15 -101 50 1 -3.5 109 0.6 -77 70 11 -1 du (au) 25 ··· χ2 aShows 1σ uncertainties. -10 ··· red (in grid) 95 0.3 -93 62 7 -2 10 4.864 (interpolated)a 95 ± 12 0.29 ± 0.12 −93 ± 7 60 ± 8 ≥ 1.4 −2.0 ± 0.8 11 ± 15 4.857 (in grid) 95 0.4 -85 58 11 -2 5 2.247 (interpolated)a 95 ± 9 0.41 ± 0.16 −85 ± 8 58 ± 7 ≥ 2.9 −2.0 ± 0.9 4 ± 12 2.246 5 10 7 6 6 6 8 ··· Fig. 9 the best fit to the F110W dataset and in Fig. 10 the best fit to the F160W data, along with their re- spective comparison to the NICMOS images and noise maps. We find that the best fit parameters are consistent for both datasets. In the following, we describe the best model by averaging the F110W and F160W best pa- rameter values and the uncertainties combined from the two fits, which provides better constraints, except for two parameters (g and θ) as discussed below. The disk has a radius of R0 = 95 ± 9 au and is seen inclined by i = 59 ± 7◦ from face-on. The best fit PA differs by 8◦ between the two datasets. This may be due to starlight residuals from the telescope spider, at a compa- rable orientation to the disk major axis, which may bias the disk position angle. The mean PA between both fits is θ = −89± 12◦ East of North, using conservative error bars encompassing uncertainties form the two fits. The disk has a relatively low Henyey-Greenstein parameter of anisotropic scattering, with values of g = 0.29± 0.12 in the F110W image, and g = 0.41±0.16 in the F160W image. Differing values can be explained by different scattering properties at different wavelengths, although we do not expect a significant difference, as the two bandpasses are relatively close. As for HD 104860, these relatively low values are consistent with the finding of Hedman & Stark (2015) about the apparently low g val- ues of inclined disks observed only near scattering angles of 90◦. We find that the dust density follows a radial power law in αout = −2 ± 0.8 outward from the parent radius, which is very consistent with the sharpness expected from evolution models with small grains on eccentric orbits accumulating outside of the main belt colliding zone (Th´ebault & Wu 2008). Given the disk inclina- tion and the quality of our images, we can only put a weak constraint on the radial profile inward from the parent radius R0, with a power law coefficient steeper than αin > 2.9. We find that the disk center may be offset by du = 7 ± 12 au along the major axis but we cannot rule out a system centered with the star. As shown in Fig. 9 and 10, over-subtraction from post- processing strongly affects the disk photometry, due to its compact appearance in the image (1.(cid:48)(cid:48)4 semi-major axis, and 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)7 semi-minor axis at the edge of the reduc- tion mask). The averaged radial and azimuthal profiles measured in the NICMOS images are thus noisy and biased by over-subtraction so we relate hereafter photo- metric values from the best models before forward mod- eling only. In the F110W filter, we measure a mean surface brightness of SF 110W = 108 ± 3 µJy/arcsec2 in the North ansae, and of SF 160W = 81±5 µJy/arcsec2 in the F160W data. Given the stellar flux in these bands (F F 110W = 3.26 Jy respectively), the disk reflectances in the North ansae are RF 110W = (22.3 ± 0.6) × 10−6 arcsec−2 and RF 160W = (25 ± 2) × 10−6 arcsec−2 in the F110W and F160W NICMOS fil- ters. By integrating the disk flux over a 7.1 arcsec2 ellip- tical area (outer and inner semi-major axes 2.(cid:48)(cid:48)3 and 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)0, oriented with the best PA θ east of north, minor axes projected by cos(i) from the major axes values), we find = 411±9 µJy in the F110W fil- flux densities of F F 110W = 319±12 µJy in the F160W filter. Af- ter and F F 160W ter normalizing by the stellar contribution, we find that = 4.85 Jy and F F 160W scat scat (cid:63) (cid:63) Debris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 13 stellar mass of M = 1.2 M(cid:12), and a dust mass density of ρ = 3.3 g.cm−3. Based on the disk infrared fractional luminosity femit = (5.7 ± 0.3) × 10−4 from Mo´or et al. (2011), we find scattering albedo values of ωF 110W = 13.0 ± 0.6% and ωF 160W = 14.7±0.7% in the F110W and F160W fil- ters, respectively. As found for HD 104860, these values rule out pure water ice composition (see Fig. 11). They are consistent with compact silicate grains larger than ∼ 6 µm, which is significantly larger than the blowout size ablow = 1.4 µm of for this system, as well as with dirty ice grains larger than ∼ 3 µm. 5. DISCUSSION These two detections add to a growing population of debris disks resolved in scattered light. To date, 41 of such have been imaged around stars from ∼ 10 Myr to a few Gyr, over a large range of spectral types (See Fig. 1). Yet, considering the numerous attempts to image de- bris disks around systems with large infrared excess in- dicative of a massive dust belt presumably detectable with basic geometric and albedo assumptions, this re- mains a relatively low number of detections. Three rea- sons could explain non-detections, given that the these surveys were designed to reach surface brightness limits based on assumptions on the disk radii and albedos. 1. Inaccurate radius estimations: radii estimations solely based on black-body fit of SEDs are known to be degenerate with the dust size distribution and can be very inaccurate. The missed disks may have radii different from those inferred from SED modeling by a factor 0.5 to 2. They could either be too compact to be observable with the ∼ 0.3(cid:48)(cid:48) typ- ical inner working angle (IWA) of current corona- graphic instruments, or be larger and thus fainter than expected, falling short of the sensitivity lim- its planned for these surveys. 2. Simplistic SPF assumptions: exposure times as- suming isotropic scattering may have been under- estimated if the disks have more complex scatter- ing phase functions, depending on their inclination to our line of sight. Recent work showed that the minimum grain sizes estimated by SED modeling are often several microns and much larger than the blowout size (Pawellek & Krivov 2015), which suggests that wrong estimations may have been used on the grain size distribution and scattering phase function in older surveys. Furthermore, low- inclination disks not only appear fainter than ex- pected if their SPF peaks at unprobed scattering angles, but they are also harder to detect with Figure 8. Goodness of fit for each parameter for the disk around HD 192758, in blue for the F110W filter dataset, and in orange for the F160W dataset. The chi square val- ues shown for each value in the grid (empty circles) have all the other parameters fixed to their best values in the grid (filled circles). The χ2 is interpolated between each pa- rameter value in the grid to refine the best fit values (filled triangles). The dashed green line shows the 1σ threshold used to estimate the uncertainties.The shaded areas show the parameters values ruled out by our modeling. the disk around HD 192758 has scattering efficiencies of = (98±4)×10−6, f F 110W scat respectively in the two NICMOS filters. = (85±2)×10−6 and f F 160W scat scat /f F 160W From these scattering efficiency measurements in two different NICMOS filters, we can measure the disk color. We find it has a scattering efficiency ratio of = 0.87± 0.05 (F110W-F160W color in- f F 110W scat dex of 0.15), indicative of red grains in the disk. Assum- ing spherical silicates grains following the Mie theory, this color is consistent with the lack of particles smaller than ∼0.5 µm in the parent belt, which is also consis- tent with the minimum size ablow = 1.4 µm under which silicate grains are blown out from the system by radia- tive pressure, assuming a stellar luminosity L = 4.9 L(cid:12), ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼▼Bestvalueinterpolated●Bestvalueingrid○Valuesingrid0.20.30.40.50.61.001.051.101.15gχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼F110WimagefitF160Wimagefit1σuncertaintylimit8590951001051.001.051.101.15R0χ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼-10-505101520251.001.051.101.15duχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼-3.5-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.01.001.051.101.15αoutχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼50556065701.001.051.101.15iχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼02468101.001.051.101.15αinχ2red/Min(χ2red)○○○○○○○○○○○○○●●●●▼▼▼▼-100-95-90-85-801.001.051.101.15θχ2red/Min(χ2red)HD 192758 fit 14 Choquet et al. Figure 9. Same as Fig. 5 for HD 192758 in the F110W filter. most post-processing techniques: they are self- subtracted with ADI-based algorithms, and over- subtracted with RDI-based techniques. 3. Unexpectedly low albedos: the undetected disks may have dust compositions with albedo lower than what we expect from basic assumptions (e.g. water ice, Mie theory...), and than what we ob- served for the bright disks well-characterized so far. We should also mention the possibility of chance non- detection, due to azimuthal sensitivity variations (tele- scope spider) or azimuthal coverage of the instruments (HST STIS wedge), e.g. the detection of the edge-on disk around HD 377 with NICMOS (Choquet et al. 2016), but non-detection with STIS due to chance align- ment with the wedge and with the telescope spider (Krist et al. 2012). Such unlucky configurations cannot explain the statistical trend seen in the different surveys with both ground-based telescopes and HST though. The new generation of high-contrast imaging instru- ments on ground-based telescopes with extreme adap- tive optics systems now offers smaller IWAs, opening the detection space toward more compact disks. Yet, only a handful of new debris disks have been detected with these instruments so far. These detections have been made possible by improved sensitivity limits at large separation compared to the first generation of im- agers, rather than by smaller IWAs (e.g. HD 131835, HD 206893 Hung et al. 2015; Milli et al. 2017b). Simi- larly, by pushing the sensitivity limits on HST-NICMOS data with modern post-processing techniques, we have discovered 11 debris disks, 10 of which with very low surface brightnesses from a few 100 µJy/arcsec2 (Soum- mer et al. 2014; Choquet et al. 2017) down to a few 10 µJy/arcsec2 including these two around HD 104860 and HD 192758 (Choquet et al. 2016, , this work). These combined results seem to indicate that there is an un- derlying population of debris disks much fainter than the population of bright debris disks discovered so far, 1.''67.AUNENICMOSImageF110WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080ForwardModelF110WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080BestModelF110WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080FitResidualsF110WAbs[Residuals]F110WNoiseMapF110WDebris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 15 Figure 10. Same as Fig. 5 for HD 192758 in the F160W filter. indicative of low scattering albedos. A rigorous statis- tical analysis estimating the completeness of previous surveys to debris disks as function of their morphology is required to assess the properties of debris disks as a whole population. Such a study is out of the scope of the present paper though, and we only discuss below comparisons with previously detected systems. The disks observed around HD 104860 and HD 192758 share several common properties. They have very simi- lar fractional infrared luminosities (∼ 6× 10−4) and are seen with the same inclination of ∼ 60◦, which makes their scattering properties directly comparable. In par- ticular, these two disks appear very faint in scattered- light, having peak surface brightnesses of a few tens of µJy/arcsec2 only, and have low scattering albedo values (10 -- 15%). A few other systems with similar inclina- tions also have comparably low scattering albedo val- ues: HD92945, HD207129, HD202628, and Fomalhaut (Golimowski et al. 2011; Krist et al. 2010, 2012; Kalas et al. 2005, respectively). Table 6 reports properties of debris disks with inclinations in the 50 -- 70◦ range with published scattering albedo values estimated with eq. 5 or with published scattering efficiencies. There are two populations of debris disks with distinct dust composi- tions, leading to low albedo values around 5 -- 15% for one population, and higher albedos around 50 -- 70% for the other. This distinction seems independent from the age of the system or the mass of the host star. Although the sample is incomplete, these populations with dis- tinct albedos seem to be present in other inclinations ranges, e.g. HD 107146 and HD 181327 in the 20 -- 30◦ range with scattering albedos of 15% and 65% respec- tively (Schneider et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2014), or HD 139664 and HD 61005 in the 80 -- 90◦ bin with respective scattering albedos of 9% and 64% (Schneider et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2014). Interestingly, the majority of comets in the solar system display low albedos of 4 -- 5% in the visible (Kolokolova et al. 2004) that can be well reproduced by mixtures of both submicron aggregates and compact 1.''67.AUNENICMOSImageF160WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080ForwardModelF160WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080BestModelF160WSurfaceBrightness(µJy/arcsec2)-40-20020406080FitResidualsF160WAbs[Residuals]F160WNoiseMapF160W16 Choquet et al. Table 6. Scattering albedos of ∼ 60◦-inclination debris disks System Spectral Age Type (Myr) Inc. Scattering (◦) Albedo λ Ref. (µm) HD 202628 Fomalhaut HD 207129 HD 92945 HD 104860 HD 192758 HD 202917 HD 15745 G5 A4 G0 K1 F8 F0 G7 F2 2300 440 2100 294 32 830 45 23 64 66 60 62 58 59 69 67 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.50 0.63 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.5 0.5 1 2 3 4,5 6 8 8 7 4,5 References -- 1: Krist et al. 2012; 2: Kalas et al. 2005; 3: Krist et al. 2010; 4: Schneider et al. 2014; 5: Chen et al. 2014;6:Golimowski et al. 2011; 7: Schneider et al. 2016; 8: This work. also displays a low albedo of 14 ± 0.01% at scattering angle of ∼ 35◦at infrared wavelengths (8 -- 31 µm), com- parable with the values that we measure for HD 104860 and HD 192758 in the near-infrared (Woodward et al. 2015). This scattering angle, set by the position of the comet with respect to the Sun and the SOFIA telescope at the moment of the observations, is at the limit of the minimum scattering angles probed in these two disks. These examples indicate that low albedo dust is common in the solar solar system, and can be explained both by solid grains, or by submicron aggre- gates, or by mixtures of both. Identifying the reason for low albedo values in debris disks systems cannot be achieved without combining resolved observations in several wavelengths regimes. Different albedos val- ues can indeed be explained not only by dust porosity but also by different chemical compositions or by dif- ferent dust size distributions. In the former case, this may indicate different initial conditions or formation mechanisms in the primordial disk that would generate planetesimals with different compositions. In the latter case, different dust size distributions would indicate dif- ferent dynamical mechanisms at work after transition from the protoplanetary stage to the evolved stage of debris disks. A better characterization of these sys- tems would be needed to discriminate one scenario from the other, for instance by constraining their dust size distribution with multi-band imaging. Figure 11. Scattering albedo as a function of grain size for a disk with HD 192758's best fit morphology, assuming different grain compositions: pure ice (blue), dirty ice (pur- ple), silicates (red), and computed in the F110W filter (top) and F160W filter (bottom). The measured scattering albedo for HD 192758 (black line) rules out pure water ice compo- sitions and is consistent dirty ice grains larger than ∼ 3 µm and pure silicate grains larger than ∼ 6 µm. particles (Kolokolova & Kimura 2010). On the other hand, infrared observations of the coma of the pristine Oort Cloud comet C/2012 K1 (Pan-STARRS) are well modeled by compact, carbon-dominated grains, while it F110WF160WDebris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 17 HD 104860 has a well defined ring shape with sharp edges at a radius of 114 au. The slope of the outer edge is consistent with evolution models, and the sharp in- ner edge is likely sculpted by an unseen planet through secular resonances. Planets of a few Earth masses with small eccentricities can cause such ring-shapes in debris disk systems (Lee & Chiang 2016). The disk around HD 192758 has a radius of 95 au. Both disks are in- clined by ∼ 60◦ from face-on, and have very low albedo values of 10% and 13% respectively, which exclude com- positions of pure water ice. They are reminiscent of several other disks previously detected with HST showing similarly low albedo values, around Fomalhaut, HD 202628, HD 207129, and HD 92945. These disks may have similar dust compositions, differing from the many brighter disks that have been imaged thus far in scattered light. Interestingly, comets in the solar systems also display comparably low albedo values in the visible. Porous grains, chemical compo- sition, as well as different dust size distribution may explain the differences in albedo in the observed pop- ulations of disks. A better characterization of these sys- tems with images in complementary bandpasses would help understand the different properties between these systems. c(cid:13) 2017. All rights reserved. E.C. acknowledges support from NASA through Hub- ble Fellowship grant HF2-51355 awarded by STScI, which is operated by AURA, Inc. for NASA un- der contract NAS5-26555, for research carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. J.-C.A. acknowledges support from the "Programme National de Plan´etologie" (PNP) of CNRS/INSU co-funded by the CNES. This work is based on data reprocessed as part of the ALICE pro- gram, which was supported by NASA through grants HST-AR-12652 (PI: R. Soummer), HST-GO-11136 (PI: D. Golimowski), HST-GO-13855 (PI: E. Choquet), HST-GO-13331 (PI: L. Pueyo), and STScI Director's Discretionary Research funds. Part of these data were calibrated as part of the LAPLACE program, which was supported by NASA through grants HST-AR-11279 (PI: G. Schneider). This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System (ADS), the Washington Dou- ble Star Catalog, maintained at the U.S. Naval Observa- tory, the Keck Observatory Archive (KOA), operated by the W. M. Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI) under contract with NASA, the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France, and of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia. This research has used archival Figure 12. Number of debris disks imaged for the first time in scattered-light per instrument. The ground-based instruments are highlighted in blue (total of 10 discoveries to date) and the HST instruments are highlighted in orange (31 discoveries to date). The NICMOS detections are split between pre-ALICE disks (5 detections) and ALICE disks (11 detections). References -- Dupont 2.5 m telescope: Smith & Terrile 1984; Subaru-HICIAO: Thalmann et al. 2013; University of Hawai 2.2 m telescope: Kalas et al. 2004; Gemini-GPI: Hung et al. 2015; Currie et al. 2015; Kalas et al. 2015; VLT-SPHERE: Kasper et al. 2015; Wahhaj et al. 2016; Matthews et al. 2017; Milli et al. 2017b; HST-STIS: Krist et al. 2012; Padgett & Stapelfeldt 2016; HST-ACS: Ardila et al. 2004; Kalas et al. 2005, 2006, 2007b,a; Krist et al. 2010; Golimowski et al. 2011, and two unpublished detections presented at conferences: HD 10647 (Stapelfeldt et al. 2007), HD 202917 (Krist et al. 2007); HST-NICMOS: Weinberger et al. 1999; Augereau et al. 1999a; Schneider et al. 1999, 2005, 2006; Hines et al. 2007; Soummer et al. 2014; Choquet et al. 2016, 2017, this work. 6. CONCLUSION To conclude, we have detected two debris disks in scattered-light, around HD 104860 and HD 192758. The former disk has previously been imaged in thermal emis- sion with Herschel but never in scattered-light, and the latter disk has never been imaged before. These disks were found in archival HST-NICMOS data in the near- infrared, from our re-analysis using modern PSF sub- traction techniques as part of the ALICE project. These two detections bring the number of debris disks discov- ered in scattered-light by this program to 11, and make NICMOS the instrument with the largest number of de- bris disk imaged in this regime to date (see Fig. 12). We carefully characterized the morphology of these disks with forward modeling techniques in order to cal- ibrate the post-processing artifacts. The disk around 11134510516DupontHICIAOU.ofH.GPISPHERESTISACSNICMOS051015InstrumentNumberofdetectionsDebrisdiskDiscoveriesinScattered-lightALICE(11)Ground-Baseddetections(10)HSTdetections(31)18 Choquet et al. data from HST programs HST-GO-10527 (PI: D. Hines) and HST-GO-11157 (PI: J. Rhee), and from Keck pro- grams. We thank the anonymous referee for her or his comments which made the paper much clearer. Facilities: HST(NICMOS). REFERENCES Ardila, D. R., Golimowski, D. A., Krist, J. E., et al. 2004, Donaldson, J. K., Lebreton, J., Roberge, A., Augereau, ApJL, 617, L147. J.-C., & Krivov, A. V. 2013, ApJ, 772, 17. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...617L.147A Augereau, J. C., Lagrange, A. M., Mouillet, D., & M´enard, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772...17D Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241. http: F. 1999a, A&A, 350, L51. http: //cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1999A%26A...350L..51A //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA%26A..41..241D Eiroa, C., Marshall, J. P., Mora, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, Augereau, J. C., Lagrange, A. M., Mouillet, D., Papaloizou, A11. http: J. C. B., & Grorod, P. A. 1999b, A&A, 348, 557. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A%26A...348..557A Barrado y Navascu´es, D., Stauffer, J. R., & Jayawardhana, R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 386 Booth, M., Kennedy, G., Sibthorpe, B., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1263. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1263B Booth, M., Jord´an, A., Casassus, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, L10. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460L..10B Booth, M., Dent, W. R. F., Jord´an, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 3200. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.3200B Brandt, T. D., McElwain, M. W., Turner, E. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 159. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794..159B Chen, C. H., Mittal, T., Kuchner, M., et al. 2014, ApJS, 211, 25. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..211...25C Choquet, ´E., Pueyo, L., Hagan, J. B., et al. 2014, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9143, Proc. SPIE, 57. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SPIE.9143E..57C Choquet, ´E., Perrin, M. D., Chen, C. H., et al. 2016, ApJL, 817, L2. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817L...2C Choquet, ´E., Milli, J., Wahhaj, Z., et al. 2017, ApJL, 834, L12. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834L..12C Currie, T., Lisse, C. M., Kuchner, M., et al. 2015, ApJL, 807, L7. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807L...7C //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A%26A...555A..11E Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A2. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...595A...2G G´asp´ar, A., Psaltis, D., Rieke, G. H., & Ozel, F. 2012, ApJ, 754, 74. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...74G Golimowski, D. A., Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 30. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...30G Hagan, J. B., Choquet, E., Soummer, R., & Vigan, A. 2018, submitted Hedman, M. M., & Stark, C. C. 2015, ApJ, 811, 67. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...67H Henyey, L. G., & Greenstein, J. L. 1941, ApJ, 93, 70. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93...70H Hillenbrand, L. A., Carpenter, J. M., Kim, J. S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 630. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677..630H Hines, D. C., Schneider, G., Hollenbach, D., et al. 2007, ApJL, 671, L165. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671L.165H Holland, W. S., Matthews, B. C., Kennedy, G. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3606. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3606H Hung, L.-W., Duchene, G., Arriaga, P., et al. 2015, ApJL, 815, L14. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815L..14H Kalas, P., Duchene, G., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Graham, J. R. 2007a, ApJL, 671, L161. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671L.161K Kalas, P., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Graham, J. R. 2007b, ApJL, Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 661, L85. VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...661L..85K http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003yCat.2246....0C Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2531. 435, 1067. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969JGR....74.2531D http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.435.1067K Debris disks imaged around HD 104860 and HD 192758 19 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Clampin, M. C., & Fitzgerald, MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Chandler, C., et al. M. P. 2006, ApJL, 637, L57. 2016b, ApJ, 823, 79. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637L..57K http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823...79M Kalas, P., Liu, M. C., & Matthews, B. C. 2004, Science, MacGregor, M. A., Matr`a, L., Kalas, P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 303, 1990. 842, 8. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Sci...303.1990K Kalas, P. G., Rajan, A., Wang, J. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...842....8M Marois, C., Lafreni`ere, D., Doyon, R., Macintosh, B., & 32. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814...32K Kasper, M., Apai, D., Wagner, K., & Robberto, M. 2015, ApJL, 812, L33. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...812L..33K Kolokolova, L., Hanner, M. S., Levasseur-Regourd, A.-C., & Gustafson, B. A. S. 2004, Physical properties of cometary dust from light scattering and thermal emission, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver, 577 -- 604. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004come.book..577K Kolokolova, L., & Kimura, H. 2010, Earth, Planets, and Space, 62, 17. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010EP%26S...62...17K Krist, J. E., Hook, R. N., & Stoehr, F. 2011, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 8127, Proc. SPIE, 0. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011SPIE.8127E..16K Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Bryden, G., & Plavchan, P. 2012, AJ, 144, 45. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144...45K Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Bryden, G., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1051. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1051K Krivov, A. V. 2010, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 383. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010RAA....10..383K Lafreni`ere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., & Artigau, ´E. 2007, ApJ, 660, 770. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660..770L Lebreton, J., Augereau, J.-C., Thi, W.-F., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A17. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A%26A...539A..17L Lee, E. J., & Chiang, E. 2016, ApJ, 827, 125. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827..125L Lowrance, P. J., McCarthy, C., Becklin, E. E., et al. 1999, ApJL, 512, L69. Nadeau, D. 2006, ApJ, 641, 556. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...641..556M Matthews, B. C., Krivov, A. V., Wyatt, M. C., Bryden, G., & Eiroa, C. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 521. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014prpl.conf..521M Matthews, E., Hinkley, S., Vigan, A., et al. 2017, ApJL, 843, L12. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843L..12M Mawet, D., Choquet, ´E., Absil, O., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 44 Meshkat, T., Mawet, D., Bryan, M. L., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 245. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..245M Metchev, S. A., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2009, ApJS, 181, 62. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..181...62M Milli, J., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., et al. 2017a, A&A, 599, A108. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A%26A...599A.108M Milli, J., Hibon, P., Christiaens, V., et al. 2017b, A&A, 597, L2. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A%26A...597L...2M Montesinos, B., Eiroa, C., Krivov, A. V., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A51. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...593A..51M Mo´or, A., ´Abrah´am, P., Derekas, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 525. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...644..525M Mo´or, A., Pascucci, I., K´osp´al, ´A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 193, 4. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..193....4M Morales, F. Y., Bryden, G., Werner, M. W., & Stapelfeldt, K. R. 2013, ApJ, 776, 111. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...776..111M -- . 2016, ApJ, 831, 97. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...97M Mustill, A. J., & Wyatt, M. C. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 3074. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...512L..69L http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.3074M MacGregor, M. A., Lawler, S. M., Wilner, D. J., et al. Padgett, D., & Stapelfeldt, K. 2016, in IAU Symposium, 2016a, ApJ, 828, 113. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828..113M Vol. 314, Young Stars & Planets Near the Sun, ed. J. H. Kastner, B. Stelzer, & S. A. Metchev, 175 -- 178. MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Rosenfeld, K. A., et al. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016IAUS..314..175P 2013, ApJL, 762, L21. Pan, M., & Schlichting, H. E. 2012, ApJ, 747, 113. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762L..21M http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747..113P 20 Choquet et al. Patel, R. I., Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., & Trollo, J. 2017, Soummer, R., Perrin, M. D., Pueyo, L., et al. 2014, ApJL, AJ, 153, 54. 786, L23. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...54P http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786L..23S Pawellek, N., & Krivov, A. V. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3207. Steele, A., Hughes, A. M., Carpenter, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.3207P 816, 27. Pawellek, N., Krivov, A. V., Marshall, J. P., et al. 2014, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...816...27S ApJ, 792, 65. Strubbe, L. E., & Chiang, E. I. 2006, ApJ, 648, 652. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...65P http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..652S Perrin, M. D., Duchene, G., Millar-Blanchaer, M., et al. Su, K. Y. L., Macgregor, M. A., Booth, M., et al. 2017, 2015, ApJ, 799, 182. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..182P Preibisch, T., Ossenkopf, V., Yorke, H. W., & Henning, T. 1993, A&A, 279, 577. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A%26A...279..577P Pueyo, L. 2016, ApJ, 824, 117. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824..117P Schneider, G., Silverstone, M. D., & Hines, D. C. 2005, ApJL, 629, L117. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...629L.117S Schneider, G., Smith, B. A., Becklin, E. E., et al. 1999, ApJL, 513, L127. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513L.127S Schneider, G., Silverstone, M. D., Hines, D. C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 414. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...650..414S Schneider, G., Grady, C. A., Hines, D. C., et al. 2014, AJ, 148, 59. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....148...59S Schneider, G., Grady, C. A., Stark, C. C., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 64. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152...64S Smith, B. A., & Terrile, R. J. 1984, Science, 226, 1421. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984Sci...226.1421S Soummer, R., Brendan Hagan, J., Pueyo, L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 55. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...55S Soummer, R., Pueyo, L., & Larkin, J. 2012, ApJL, 755, L28. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755L..28S ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1709.10129. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170910129S Thalmann, C., Janson, M., Buenzli, E., et al. 2013, ApJL, 763, L29. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763L..29T Th´ebault, P. 2009, A&A, 505, 1269. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A%26A...505.1269T Th´ebault, P., & Wu, Y. 2008, A&A, 481, 713. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A%26A...481..713T Thureau, N. D., Greaves, J. S., Matthews, B. C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2558. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2558T Vican, L., Schneider, A., Bryden, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 263. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..263V Wahhaj, Z., Milli, J., Kennedy, G., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, L4. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A%26A...596L...4W Weinberger, A. J., Becklin, E. E., Schneider, G., et al. 1999, ApJL, 525, L53. http: //cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1999ApJ...525L..53W Wisdom, J. 1980, AJ, 85, 1122. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980AJ.....85.1122W Woodward, C. E., Kelley, M. S. P., Harker, D. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 181. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809..181W Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339. http: //adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ARA%26A..46..339W
1511.00303	1	1511	2015-11-01T19:59:44	The Role of the Cooling Prescription for Disk Fragmentation: Numerical Convergence & Critical Cooling Parameter in Self-Gravitating Disks	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Protoplanetary disks fragment due to gravitational instability when there is enough mass for self-gravitation, described by the Toomre parameter, and when heat can be lost at a rate comparable to the local dynamical timescale, described by t_c=beta Omega^-1. Simulations of self-gravitating disks show that the cooling parameter has a rough critical value at beta_crit=3. When below beta_crit, gas overdensities will contract under their own gravity and fragment into bound objects while otherwise maintaining a steady state of gravitoturbulence. However, previous studies of the critical cooling parameter have found dependence on simulation resolution, indicating that the simulation of self-gravitating protoplanetary disks is not so straightforward. In particular, the simplicity of the cooling timescale t_c prevents fragments from being disrupted by pressure support as temperatures rise. We alter the cooling law so that the cooling timescale is dependent on local surface density fluctuations, a means of incorporating optical depth effects into the local cooling of an object. For lower resolution simulations, this results in a lower critical cooling parameter and a disk more stable to gravitational stresses suggesting the formation of large gas giants planets in large, cool disks is generally suppressed by more realistic cooling. At our highest resolution however, the model becomes unstable to fragmentation for cooling timescales up to beta = 10.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version October 11, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 05/12/14 THE ROLE OF THE COOLING PRESCRIPTION FOR DISK FRAGMENTATION: NUMERICAL CONVERGENCE & CRITICAL COOLING PARAMETER IN SELF-GRAVITATING DISKS Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Konigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Hans Baehr1 and Hubert Klahr Draft version October 11, 2018 Abstract Protoplanetary disks fragment due to gravitational instability when there is enough mass for self- gravitation, described by the Toomre parameter, and when heat can be lost at a rate comparable to the local dynamical timescale, described by tc = βΩ−1. Simulations of self-gravitating disks show that the cooling parameter has a rough critical value at βcrit = 3. When below βcrit, gas overdensities will contract under their own gravity and fragment into bound objects while otherwise maintaining a steady state of gravitoturbulence. However, previous studies of the critical cooling parameter have found dependence on simulation resolution, indicating that the simulation of self-gravitating protoplanetary disks is not so straightforward. In particular, the simplicity of the cooling timescale tc prevents fragments from being disrupted by pressure support as temperatures rise. We alter the cooling law so that the cooling timescale is dependent on local surface density fluctuations, a means of incorporating optical depth effects into the local cooling of an object. For lower resolution simulations, this results in a lower critical cooling parameter and a disk more stable to gravitational stresses suggesting the formation of large gas giants planets in large, cool disks is generally suppressed by more realistic cooling. At our highest resolution however, the model becomes unstable to fragmentation for cooling timescales up to β = 10. Subject headings: hydrodynamics -- instabilities -- planets and satellites: formation -- planets and satellites: gaseous planets -- protoplanetary disks 1. INTRODUCTION Between the two major theories of planet formation, core accretion and gravitational instability (GI), only the latter shows a tendency to form gas giant planets in wide orbits around young stars. The core accretion scenario, whereby the coagulation of dust particles forms larger objects like planetesimals and eventually cores, is the dominant mode of planet formation (Janson et al., 2011). It is particularly efficient at forming solid objects within 10 au due to the amount of solid material and high collision rate (Safronov, 1969; Pollack et al., 1996). However, it is a slow process in outer regions, forming planetary cores with masses > 10M⊕ at timescales longer than the lifetime of the disk (106 to 107 years), whereas the timescale for generating dense gaseous clumps by gravitational instability is significantly shorter at around 1000 years (Boss, 1997). At distances beyond around 30 au, protoplanetary disks become gravitationally un- stable when they accrete enough mass such that regions within the disk collapse due to self-gravity, creating frag- ments that can accumulate solid material to form cores of Jovian planets or possibly form low mass stars (Boss, 1997). Thus discoveries of planets with large orbital radii (Rameau et al., 2013; Marois et al., 2008) suggest that GI may be a feasible formation mechanism to form plan- ets where core accretion has trouble operating, but not common enough to form planets at higher rates than via core accretion (Janson et al., 2011, 2012). Gravitational instability becomes a significant factor in the disk when enough cold gas is present for strong self- gravitation and the disk cools efficiently (Gammie, 2001; 1 [email protected] Durisen et al., 2007). These two conditions are measured by the Toomre parameter Q and a simple cooling rela- tion tc, respectively. The Toomre parameter represents a balance of the local centripetal and gravitational forces on a contracting fragment of the disk and is defined by Toomre (1964) as: where Ω =(cid:112)GM/R3 is the orbital Keplerian frequency Q = (1) csΩ πGΣ , of the disk, which stabilizes the disk to large wavelength density perturbations and cs is the local speed of sound, which stabilizes the disk to shorter density perturbations (Durisen et al., 2007). Protoplanetary disks are generally considered thin, so the surface density is the vertically in- tegrated density Σ ≈ ρH, where H is the scale height of the disk. Regions of the disk with values below Q ≈ 1 are unstable to axisymmetric perturbations and will con- tract into denser clumps, while a region with Q > 1 will remain stable to gravitational collapse (Toomre, 1964). When stable, a disk tends to stay close to Q ≈ 1 as higher values mean there is more heat to be lost and the disk will cool faster and contract. Falling below Q ≈ 1 results in strong shock heating which raises the tempera- ture and returns the disk to marginal stability (Balbus & Papaloizou, 1999). This gravitoturbulent situation arises when these effects balance each other and the simulation settles for several orbital periods. When a fragment has formed it must remain bound under its own gravity and must remain cool enough so that a clump can collapse on a free-fall timescale shorter than shear can disrupt it (Kratter & Murray-Clay, 2011). 2 Therefore a short cooling law tc = βΩ−1 (2) is the second condition for creating an non-fragmenting disk, as a disk that can dump enough energy will form collapsed fragments which can withstand being torn apart by shocks and tidal shearing forces. Sufficient cool- ing has been an issue for the applicability of GI in the past (Rafikov, 2005), but it has been shown that short enough cooling times (Tomley et al., 1991, 1994), rep- resented in this paper by values below the critical value of βcrit = 3 (Gammie, 2001), it is possible to form grav- itationally bound clumps that survive the shear of the disk. Meru & Bate (2011) found βcrit changes with reso- lution, first for global smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations and later followed by local finite- difference shearing sheet models of Paardekooper (2012). These results would indicate that the critical cooling timescale may be significantly longer, up to tc = 20Ω−1, extending the GI formation domain to regions of the disk within 30 au (see Figure 2 of Janson et al. (2012)). This conflicts with our current understanding of formation regimes of core accretion and gravitational instability, suggesting that GI may be more common than detected by current observations (Janson et al., 2011, 2012). Ad- ditionally, this is a significant problem to the applicabil- ity of previous results as a resolution dependent solution implies that all previous studies at different resolutions produce different fragmentation conditions. The widely used simple cooling law cools every loca- tion at the same rate, failing to account for the effects of optical depth on cooling efficiency or the increased strength of surface density fluctuations with resolution. To account for the varying optical depth with density, we alter the cooling to include a linear dependence on the local surface density in the disk. This is expected to suppress the formation of fragments from strong den- sity fluctuations which will cool slower and be supported against collapse by higher internal temperature. Con- versely, underdense regions will cool faster and prone to collapse, perhaps leading to convergence of the fragmen- tation boundary with resolution. Other studies of thermodynamics on disk stability have focused on different methods, such as radiative cooling (Boley et al., 2006; Cai et al., 2006) and modifications to the equation of state (Laughlin et al., 1998) or have concentrated on different sources of heat such as irradi- ation from external sources (Rice et al., 2011; Kratter & Murray-Clay, 2011; Vorobyov et al., 2015). The clos- est approach to what is carried out here, Paardekooper (2012), showed with two-dimensional finite difference shearing sheet simulations, a simple cooling scheme does not lead to a converged critical cooling parameter for fragmentation. Rice et al. (2014) attempted to attain convergence by adjusting the numerical cooling and vis- cosity with a SPH code, but the critical cooling param- eter identified therein does not agree with the results of both Gammie (2001) and this paper. The aim of this paper is to investigate the relation between the cooling law of the disk and the simulation resolution and their effect on formation conditions of gas giants planets. This means implementing a more real- istic cooling relation per grid cell in local simulations, one dependent on the local surface density to mimic the change in optical depth for varying densities. This paper will proceed with an overview of the important equations in hydrodynamic simulations, the shearing sheet approx- imation and other theoretical considerations in Section 2 followed by the specifics of the numerical setup in Sec- tion 3. Finally, we look at the results of simulations and how they differ from previous attempts in Section 4 and discuss the limitations and implications in Section 5. 2. THEORY To obtain high resolution simulations of disk dynam- ics the situation needs to be reduced to an numerically less expensive problem. Here we consider a fully gaseous disk with minimal magnetization, so the physical laws are the normal hydrodynamic (HD) equations. Since a very cool, thin disk is being considered, the equations and simulations here are only in radial and azimuthal directions. Like many astrophysical fluids, we treat the disk as a fluid with a high Reynolds number so we can describe its behavior in a disk around a young stellar object (YSO) using Eulers equation for the conservation of momentum and the typical equations for mass and energy conservation. + ∇ · (Σv) = 0 + (v · ∇)v = −∇P + ∇ · (v) = −P∇ · v, Σ − ∇Φ ∂Σ ∂t ∂v ∂t ∂ ∂t (3) (4) (5) Since we are studying GI we consider the disk to be self-gravitating, defined by a potential Φ which is the solution to the Poisson equation for a razor-thin disk ∇2Φ = 4πGΣδ(z), (6) which is solved in Fourier space by transforming the sur- face density to find the potential at the scale of wavenum- ber k and transforming the solution back into real space. The solution to the Poisson equation in Fourier space is Φ(kx, ky, t) = − 2πGΣ(kx, ky, t) k . (7) In these simulations we smooth self-gravity on the grid scale and do not limit small wavelength modes in the calculation of self-gravity. Finally, we consider the gas in the disk to be ideal, with surface density Σ, internal energy , and 2D specific heat ratio γ P = (γ − 1)Σ. (8) The selection of the specific heat ratio has an effect on the cooling rate required for fragmentation (Rice et al., 2005). Higher values of γ result in a stiffer equation of state that requires a lower cooling time for fragmenta- tion. A ratio of γ = 1.6 is used here which compared to the value of γ = 2 by Gammie (2001) might result in fragmentation at a slightly higher value of the critical cooling timescale βcrit. 2.1. Shearing Sheet Model From these initial equations we move to a local de- scription of a small section of the disk using a sheering sheet approximation. The disk is modeled locally on a small radial-azimuthal patch of the disk, transforming the global cylindrical coordinates to local Cartesian co- ordinates co-rotating with the disk (Goldreich & Lynden- Bell, 1965). These assumptions allow for the modeling of the local properties of the disk while following the evolu- tion of fragments that form when using periodic bound- ary conditions. This approximation ignores other prop- erties of the disk such as accretion, non-local stresses and migration, which are saved for global simulations. Fol- lowing this model, the relevant equations are similar to the conservation equations as above but with additional terms for the Coriolis effect 2Ω × u and centripetal force qΩvxy as well as heating H and cooling terms C in the equation for conservation of energy. Additionally, the Pencil code used for these simulations uses entropy s as the thermodynamic variable in the conservation of en- ergy equation. − qΩx (9) ∂Σ ∂t ∂u ∂t ∂s ∂t + ∇ · (Σu) = fD(Σ) + u · ∇u = ∂Σ ∂y ∂u ∂y + qΩvxy − 2Ω × u − ∇Φ + fν(u) ∂s ∂y − qΩx − ∇P Σ − qΩx (cid:0)2ΣνS2 − Λ + fχ(s)(cid:1) + (u · ∇)s = 1 ΣT (10) (11) In these equations, u = (vx, vy + qΩx)T is the perturbed velocity in the disk due to the shear in the local box. Vis- cous heat is generated by H = 2ΣνS2, with rate-of-strain tensor S, and radiated away by an approximation Λ de- scribed in greater detail later in Section 2. The source terms fD(Σ), fν(u), fχ(s) for hyperdiffusion, hypervis- cosity, and hyperconductivity respectively are explicit terms to keep the solution well-behaved when shocks arise and will be expanded upon in Section 3. 2.2. The α-parameter An important disk parameter to be determined by our shearing sheet model is the α stress, a means to mea- suring and comparing the sources of turbulence in a disk (Shakura & Sunyaev, 1973). This formalism relies on the assumptions that the disk is thin and that angular mo- mentum is transported locally through a dimensionally defined viscosity ν = αcsH (Pringle, 1981). A thin disk means that the only non-vanishing term of the vertically integrated stress tensor T is Trφ = −rΣν dΩ dr , (12) which, when adding the above description of viscosity, becomes Trφ = −αP d ln Ω d ln r . (13) This shows the total stress in the disk comes only from the pressure and therefore viscosity is mostly local. Solv- ing for α and defining the stress as the sum of the average gravitational and Reynolds stress tensors (Cossins et al., 2009) gives: (cid:18) d ln Ω d ln r α = − (cid:104)Gxy(cid:105) = (cid:19)−1 (cid:104)Gxy(cid:105) + (cid:104)Hxy(cid:105) (cid:90) ∞ Σc2 s gxgy 4πG dz −∞ , (14) 3 (15) (16) which allows us to calculate the α generated by the sim- ulation, where and (cid:104)Hxy(cid:105) = (cid:104)Σuxuy(cid:105). The analytic expression of α based solely on input pa- rameters γ and β is given by Gammie (2001): α = 4 9 1 γ(γ − 1)tcΩ (17) which gives a prediction for the stress in a gravitoturbu- lent viscously heated disk. From equations (17) and (14) we are able to compare theoretical expectations of the gravitoturbulent state with the stresses generated by our simulations. 2.3. Heating and Cooling For a disk to become unstable and its fragments to survive, it needs to cool fast enough to overcome the stabilizing effects of shocks and shearing motions. This means one needs a careful description of how the disk is treated thermodynamically; how and where heat is generated and released from the disk. The only active sources of heating come from viscous heating and shock dissipation, the first and third terms on the right side of equation (11). Passive heating comes in the form of irra- diation by the central star or other nearby stars, which limits the cooling from the surface. A more physically accurate model currently in use is full radiative transfer, which typically requires three di- mensional simulations with intricate opacities (see Boss (2001), Boley et al. (2006) and Cai et al. (2006)). Sim- ulating cooling by radiative transfer is complicated, re- quiring significant computational resources with results differing on whether there is enough cooling to form frag- ments by gravitational instability. The effect of varying opacities with a simple cooling timescale has been inves- tigated by Johnson & Gammie (2003) but without look- ing into the effect of varying resolutions and the stronger surface density perturbations which arise with increasing resolution. To use computational resources more efficiently, simu- lations in this paper are run with a cooling law such that each grid cell loses an amount of heat per time given by the cooling law in the form Λ = U/tc s − c2 Σ(c2 s,irr) (γ − 1)tc , (18) Λ = s,irr)/(γ − 1) is the two-dimensional s − c2 where U = Σ(c2 energy density with a non-zero background irradiation term c2 s,irr. A disk with no irradiation will allow the gas to cool to a lower temperature and thus have less support from gravitational collapse. 4 The simple cooling time is derived by the assump- tion that the cooling timescale tc is proportional to the shearing or dynamical timescale Ω−1. This means that β = tcΩ will be near unity to allow for dense clumps to collapse before tidal disruption. This assumes however, that surface density fluctuations are small compared to the initial value Σ0, but density fluctuations will become larger with increased resolution, making a constant cool- ing parameter less viable with higher resolutions. Here we re-examine this approximation, providing a rationale for a cooling timescale which varies with surface density for each grid cell, cooling denser regions slower and less dense regions faster, offering a more realistic approach to disk cooling. In this way, cooling is not only more appropriate for the physical system, it also scales according to stronger surface density fluctuations with increased resolution. To approximate the heat lost by the disk through ra- diation, we assume heat is lost at a rate per unit surface area according to the Stefan-Boltmann law Λ(Σ, U, Ω) = 2σT 4 e , (19) with Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ and effective disk temperature Te. From the Hubeny (1990) treatment of an radiative transfer in a optically thick disk by the diffu- sion approximation, one can express the effective surface temperature in terms of the midplane temperature Tc and the Rosseland mean optical depth τR of the inter- vening disk material T 4 e = 8 3 T 4 c τR . (20) This yields a heat loss relationship in terms of the mid- plane temperature and the passive heating due to irradi- ation from the star (Rafikov, 2015) c − T 4 irr) τR σ(T 4 16 3 (21) Λ = . From this and the internal energy U one can write the cooling timescale tc = U Λ = 3 16 U τR c − T 4 irr) σ(T 4 ≈ 3 16 U Σκ c − T 4 irr) σ(T 4 , (22) where the optical depth is estimated in the optically thick regime by τR ≈ Σκ. This approximation produces an additional surface density dependence of the cooling timescale compared to the standard cooling prescription. Since we are considering the cool region of the disk where opacities are dominated by ice grains, κ has no additional Σ dependence only a dependence on temperature which we ignore for now (Bell & Lin, 1993). Therefore, we approximate the cooling timescale in equation (18) by including a linear dependence on surface density this critical value and will not fragment above it. It is important to note that this critical value is found for sim- ulations with 1024 × 1024 grid cells, and will differ with changing resolution, which is the focus of this investiga- tion. 2.4. Fragmentation Gravitational instability does not necessarily result in fragmentation; if 1 ≤ Q ≤ 2 the disk will be unstable to nonaxisymmetric perturbations, or spiral arms, that will transport angular momentum, but not collapse into frag- ments, a so-called gravitoturbulent state (Bodenheimer & Lin, 2002; Armitage, 2011). Additionally, clumps may become overdense only to fall apart and allow a disk to settle to a steady state. Therefore, fragments need to both be able to form and survive disruption for a few or- bits (Kratter et al., 2010). A fragment survives when its density is above the Roche limit, where the self-gravity of the fragment is sufficient to keep from being sheared apart by the tidal forces of the protostar(Shi & Chiang, 2013; Chandrasekhar, 1963) ρRoche = 3.5 M∗ R3 , (24) where M∗ is the mass of the central star and R is the radial distance between the fragment and star. Since all presented simulations are local and take no consideration of any absolute central mass, one can use the Keplerian frequency Ω = (cid:112)GM/R3 of the shear- ing box and the sound speed cs = HΩ to formulate an expression for the Roche surface density in terms of sim- ulation scale quantities and gravitational constant G ΣRoche = 7 c2 s HG , (25) where ΣRoche = 2ρRocheH (Vorobyov & Basu, 2009). Fragments have formed when clump density is greater than the Roche surface density for more than a few cool- ing timescales tc. 3. NUMERICAL METHODS The local simulation of a disk is conveniently handled by a finite difference, partial differential equation solver for compressible MHD equations. Used for my investiga- tions is the Pencil Code2 (Brandenburg, 2001), which is chosen for its high-order numerical scheme and its mod- ularity. As a finite difference code the simulation domain is divided into a grid of cells where physical quantities are calculated and advanced in discrete time-steps. The length of the time-step is determined by the Courant criterion with Courant constant C0 = 0.4, which must be satisfied for convergence to be possible (cid:18) δx (cid:19) tc = β (Σ/Σ0) Ω−1. (23) δt = C0min ux + cs , δy uy + cs , (26) This replaces equation (2), which is specific to constant optical depths whereas equation (23) will take into con- sideration the changing optical depths in the disk due to local surface densities over the course of the simula- tion. Previous studies using the simple cooling law (2), notably Gammie (2001), have found a critical value of β (cid:39) 3 where disks tend to fragment for β values below which is calculated over the entire domain to calculate a single time-step to advance the entire system uniformly. For a two-dimensional simulation this means that the derivatives for each basic physical quantity is calculated 2 http://pencil-code.nordita.org/ in each grid cell with an upwinding scheme to eliminate spurious Nyquist signals (cid:48) f 0 = −2f−3 + 15f−2 − 60f−1 + 20f0 + 30f1 − 3f2 60δx − δx5f (6) 60 = D(up,5) + O(δx6). (27) The code then proceeds to the next time step determined by the Courant condition. Shocks present problems in hydrodynamical simula- tions as discontinuities cannot be represented by high- order polynomials, leading to additional minimums and maximums. Therefore explicit dissipation terms are added to the conservation equations above to smooth out the waves so they do not hinder the performance of the simulation. These terms have two parts, one being a sixth-order hyper dissipation method and the second be- ing a localized shock-capturing method, active in regions with large negative velocity divergences. The hyperdif- fusion term looks like fD(Σ) = ζD(∇6Σ), (28) with analogous forms for both hyperviscosity fν(u) and hyperconductivity fχ(s). The shock-capturing portions for each dissipative term are fD(Σ) = ζD(∇2Σ + ∇ ln ζD · ∇Σ) fν(u) = ζν(∇(∇ · u) + (∇ ln Σ + ∇ ln ζν)∇ · u) fχ(s) = ζχ(∇2s + ∇ ln ζχ · ∇s), (29) (30) (31) where the ζ term for each is analogous to the following viscous example ζν = νsh(cid:104)max3[(−∇ · u)+](cid:105)[min(δx, δy, δz)]2. (32) 3.1. Boundary Conditions Typical of shearing sheet simulations, the boundary conditions are periodic along y = 0 and y = L which means ghost zones are used to give conditions for grid cells near these boundaries (Stone & Norman, 1992). Derivatives are not calculated in these regions, only the values of density, velocity, etc. so that physical properties and their derivatives maybe calculated near the borders. f (x, y, t) = f (x, y + L, t) (33) The boundaries x = 0 and x = L require a different boundary condition on account of the shear velocity uy = vy + 3 2 Ωx (Hawley et al., 1995). f (x, y, t) = f (x + L, y − 3 2 ΩLt, t) (34) When calculating this over a shear periodic x-boundary, the displacement due to the shear is taken into account by shifting the entire y-direction to make the x-direction periodic before proceeding with the transform in the x- direction. After the calculation of the potential in Fourier space the process is reversed to get back to real space. 3.2. Initial Conditions The Pencil Code uses dimensionless scale parameters for all physical values and constants. This helps keep 5 numbers from getting too large or too small for the code to handle. The variables and constants can be scaled back to physical units after the computation is complete. The Keplerian frequency Ω = (cid:112)GM∗/R3 is one of the more important parameters because it relates the shear- ing box to its surroundings, with R the distance to the central massive object and M∗ being the mass of the central object. The initial state of the disk is set so that the Toomre value throughout is on the borderline of stability and instability Q = 1. By equation (1), this condition is met by setting the gravitational constant G, the Keple- rian orbital frequency Ω, and the uniform surface den- sity distribution Σ0 = 1. Furthermore, the sound speed cs is initially set to π which means the constant back- ground irradiation set by c2 s,0 in equation (18) is π2. The physical length of the simulation needs to be longer than the critical wave length λcrit = 2c2 s/GΣ0 (Toomre, 1964) and so the physical length of the shearing box is Lx = Ly = (160/π)H for all runs, which also ensures a resolution of one scale height by at least 10 grid cells. The ratio of specific heats is set to the 2D adiabatic case γ = 1.6, which maps to a 3D adiabatic index of between 1.6 and 1.9 depending on the self-gravitation in the disk (Johnson & Gammie, 2003). 4. RESULTS Simulations of self-gravitating disks have used simple cooling (2) as a useful starting point to model disk cool- ing, but as a simple mathematical relationship between the cooling and dynamic timescales it does not remain consistent for changing resolutions because it does not consider that optical depths vary in the disk. Naturally the general inclination of these simulations is to push for higher resolution with the hope that the fragmentation boundary will eventually level off at some higher resolu- tion, but this expectation is not realistic. Surface density fluctuations will continue to increase but without a phys- ically motivated solution there is no way to adequately scale with resolution. Here we will show that our initial setup is consistent with previous results, e.g. the fragmentation boundary varies with resolution and this boundary is (cid:39) 3 for the smallest number of grid cells considered Nx = Ny = 1024. Finally we will show that changing the way the disk cools according to Section 2 results in a disk that fragments at shorter cooling timescales, without demon- strating convergence. 4.1. Previous Results Initial simulations run with Nx = 1024 and Ny = 1024 are established with a uniform surface density distribu- tion, linear velocity shear and subsequently heated by shocks that develop from trailing density structures and cooled assuming large constant optical depth. At this resolution all simulations were adjusted to be consistent with the fragmentation criterion βcrit=3, in which case a simulation with a cooling parameter of β = 10 does not fragment. The simulation on the left of Figure 1 demonstrates the steady state of such a disk with non- axisymmetric density structures and roughly constant overall Toomre stability. The behavior of the gravitoturbulent simulation is shown as the solid red line in Figure 2, showing the 6 Fig. 1. -- Logarithmic surface densities of two different outcomes of self-gravitating disks. On the left is the stable gravitoturbulent state where heating and cooling are in balance and produce density waves. On the right is the case where cooling is short enough to allow an overdense clump to survive tidal shearing and become a bound fragment. ity. By equation (17), α = 0.046 for disks with cooling criterion β = 10, and is observed in the stable case. In the gravitationally unstable case (solid blue line of Figure 2), fragments cool faster than they can be torn apart by tidal shear and collapse into one or more over- densities that may continue to grow or merge through collisions. Such behavior is expected for simulations with resolution N = 1024 and cooling parameter β (cid:46) 3, as a clump will be able to collapse to a compact density before being sheared apart over a few dynamical timescales. A disk is considered to fragment when it has surpassed the Roche surface density, indicated by the dashed lines for each simulation in Figure 2, as defined in Section 2. The difference between the two simulations shown in Figures 1 and 2 is that the total number of grid cells is quadrupled, which should not lead to such a drastic shift towards fragmentation. This is consistent with simula- tions by Meru & Bate (2011) and Paardekooper (2012), which indicate the critical cooling criterion of Gammie (2001) may be as high as βcrit = 10. Thus a constant cooling parameter does not adequately scale with resolu- tion and a new approach to cooling is needed to observe a convergent fragmentation boundary. 4.2. Results with adjusted cooling The results here use parameters identical to the sim- ulations in the previous section, besides the modifica- tion to the cooling law described in Section 2 by equa- tion (23). Figure 3 shows the case where β = 10 is shown for four different resolutions, all of which show non-fragmentation. These simulations are a direct com- parison to the two shown in Figure 2 and in particu- lar, the significant change between the behavior of the N = 1024 and N = 2048 cases shows the effect of alter- ing the cooling prescription. Fig. 2. -- A plot of maximum surface density over time shows the change in the fragmentation behavior two identical simulations aside from the resolution. The N = 2048 case should not fragment if the critical cooling criterion is β = 3 according to Gammie (2001). maximum surface density to observe incidences of frag- mentation. As discussed in Gammie (2001), initial small random velocities develop into non-linear fluctuations in surface density, velocity and gravitational potential be- fore settling to a steady state in the non-fragmenting case, shown on the left of Figure 2 or continuing to grow in the fragmenting case, shown on the right of Figure 2. As can be seen in the Figure 2, in the stable gravito- turbulent case clumps are continuously forming but are torn apart before they are allowed to reach Roche density where they will be able to withstand further disruption. The trailing density structures lead to a finite α viscos- 050100150200Ωt100101102103Σ/Σ0N=1024, β=10N=2048, β=10Roche densityRoche density7 each grid cell. When the disk cools according to the old cooling law tc = βΩ−1, all regions in the disk lose the same amount of heat at the same timescale tc. However, since one expects a clump to have a higher optical depth τ ≈ Σκ cooling efficiency should change from one loca- tion to another depending on the surface density. This motivates the alteration to the cooling timescale, which causes denser regions of the disk to have a higher op- tical depth and retain their heat, stabilizing to gravita- tional collapse. On the other hand, underdense regions will have a lower relative optical depth, cool faster and clump into dense structures easier. Figure 6 shows the total α stress in a disk with adjusted cooling and the calculated value matches the expectation of the analytical prediction (17). At early times, non- axisymmetric perturbations become unstable and con- tract causing a small drop in the total value of α just after tc = 40Ω−1. After this initial burst which is domi- nated by the shocks and self-gravity of the formed density structures, cooling takes over and the simulation settles to the expected gravitoturbulent α-value. The convergent behavior continues to lower cooling pa- rameter values as well, Figure 4 showing the results of three simulations with different resolutions at β = 2. Previously these simulations would have been expected to fragment, but here all show consistent steady gravi- toturbulence. This begins to show the shift of the frag- mentation boundary towards shorter cooling timescales. Figure 5 shows the results of simulations at even short timescales with a new fragmentation boundary antici- pated at around β = 0.5. 5. DISCUSSION The results here show that the convergence issue of fragmentation in protoplanetary disks can not be ap- proached by refining the numerical methods but by using more sophisticated physics. As simulations reach higher resolutions, they will likely need improved physical mod- els to approach convergence. Additionally, the results here keep the formation regime of gravitational insta- bility in the outer regions of disks where cooling times are sufficiently short. This is is contrary to other re- sults which obtain convergence and see longer cooling timescale possible for the formation of planets, moving the formation region to shorter radii. 5.1. Convergence Whereas the old cooling timescale showed drastic dif- ferences in fragmentation behavior between two resolu- tions as seen in Figure 2, the simulations here are consis- tent with each other over similar cooling timescales, cool- ing reaching a gravitoturbulent state at similar rates and settling at similar densities. This can be attributed to the sensitivity to density of the new cooling method em- ployed here. When overdensities cool slower than other regions, they retain more heat and are more likely to be disrupted, decreasing the fragment density below the Roche density threshold and are suppressed from further fragmentation. However this does not mean a new fragmentation boundary has been attained. Figure 5 shows different fragmentation behavior for varying cooling times and resolutions and the lack of convergence is particularly Fig. 3. -- The maximum surface densities of the two simulations shown in figure 2, but with cooling prescription changed to ac- count for the varying optical depths in the disk. The dashed lines are the corresponding Roche densities which are a fragmentation threshold. Fig. 4. -- Maximum density evolution of the three simulations from Table 1 with β = 2. Under the fragmentation criterion of Gammie (2001) these simulations should fragment, but are instead gravitoturbulent with the change of cooling. Simulations using the new cooling prescription. TABLE 1 Name hk10Q1 hk2Q1 hkp5Q1 1k10Q1 1k5Q1 1kp5Q1 2k10Q1 2k5Q1 2kp5Q1 4k10Q1 4k2Q1 Grid Cells (N 2) 5122 5122 5122 10242 10242 10242 20482 20482 20482 40962 40962 β 10 2 0.5 10 2 0.5 10 2 0.5 10 2 Fragmentation No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes This is expected because defining the cooling accord- ing to equation (23) creates an effective cooling time for 050100150200Ωt100101102103104Σ/Σ0N=512, β=10N=1024, β=10N=2048, β=10N=4096, β=10Roche densityRoche densityRoche densityRoche density050100150200Ωt100101102103104Σ/Σ0N=512, β=2N=1024, β=2N=2048, β=2N=4096, β=2Roche densityRoche densityRoche densityRoche density8 Fig. 5. -- Plot of cooling parameter β against number of grid cells in one direction N for all simulations run with the new cooling prescription from Table 1. The dashed line at βcrit = 3 is the fragmentation boundary as defined by Gammie (2001). The dotted line is the proposed new fragmentation boundary based on the simulations carried out here. be due to the fact that assuming a simple linear relation in surface density does not fully capture the dependence of the cooling timescale on surface density. Also, as the cooling rate is a function of orbital frequency Ω, surface density Σ and temperature T there may be an additional dependence on temperature that must be explored in the future. Paardekooper (2012) confirmed the non-convergence shown in SPH simulations with a finite difference code, which led to the assertion that fragmentation might be a stochastic process in circumstellar disks. The implica- tion is that planet formation by GI is inevitable and the only reason that GI is not more prevalent is because the timescale for clumps in weakly cooling disks to achieve fragmentation is longer than the lifetime of the disk. This assumes that once fragmented, clumps do not fall apart and there is no process in the disk that could lead to the disruption of a successfully fragmenting clump. Our cooling implementation becomes weaker for a fragment as it increases in density, offering the necessary resistance to the stochastic formation of growing overdensities such that fragmentation is no longer an eventuality. Consider the case of a clump which hovers very close to its Roche density, such as the solid blue line in figure 4. In this case the simulation forms a clump which should have a better chance of crossing the threshold into be- coming a fragment and remaining so. However, even as it manages to form a clump which crosses this threshold once, it still returns to a gravitoturbulent state at simu- lation time t = 50Ω−1, a result of the local cooling time. For this reason, these simulations do not indicate frag- mentation is a strictly stochastic process independent on Fig. 6. -- The calculated (solid black line) versus predicted value (solid red line) of α for simulation named 2k10Q1 which is a high resolution (N = 2048) gravitoturbulent disk with adjusted cooling. Also plotted are the hydrodynamic and gravitational constituents of the α stress. noticeable in the cases where β = 0.5. The N = 1024 simulation appears closer to fragmentation than the N = 512 case and might be considered borderline fragmenta- tion, where a clump surpasses the Roche density, but is sheared apart in less than an orbit (2πΩ−1) (Meru & Bate, 2011). This is not the case for N = 512 as a clump here never reaches Roche density and at the highest reso- lution studied (N = 2048) the disk fragments. This may 102103104N10-1100101102ββcrit=3β=0.5No fragmentationFragmentation020406080100120Ωt0.00.20.40.60.8ααtotalαhydroαgravα=0.046the strength of fluctuations. Meru & Bate (2011) and Lodato & Clarke (2011) have suggested that the lack of convergence may be an effect of the numerical setups used, however Rice et al. (2014) did not find an issue with the artificial viscosity. Rice et al. (2014) does however alter they way in which an SPH method cools, using kernel smoothing to spread released heat around to neighboring particles. At high densities this has a similar effect to the cooling used here, with clusters of particles able to share their heat among each other so that dense clumps retain heat and resist col- lapse. At lower densities cooling is unchanged and this shows in their resulting critical cooling criterion which increases to 7 ≤ β ≤ 9 compared to the reduction of the criterion in this study. Additionally, the ability of this cooling modification to remain consistent with par- ticle number is uncertain, as it introduces a parameter, smoothing length, which should be scaled with resolu- tion. Rice et al. (2005) suggests that fragmentation is the result of the disk being unable to withstand the com- bined Reynolds and gravitational stresses which results in a fragmentation boundary at α ≈ 0.1. The simula- tions here do not support a fragmentation boundary at this value as some disks remain stable at values as high as α = 1. For simulations with the altered cooling time it is expected that the disk can remain stable to higher stresses because the localized cooling time stabilizes frag- ments and the disk as a whole. 5.2. Giant Planet Formation The theories of how planets are formed are slowly start- ing to come to some agreement. Planetesimals formed by binary accretion of solid objects leads to the forma- tion of rocky planets within 30 au of a young star with massive cores able to accumulate significant gaseous en- velopes may become gas giant planets (Mordasini et al., 2010). This does not explain how to form large gas plan- ets in outer regions of the disk, but disk instability of- fers a niche formation mechanism that can form planets in these regions given the right conditions. Since these distant gas planets are not very common and planet for- mation by instability is not an easy process, it appears that for now this is a reasonable explanation. A suggestion by Meru & Bate (2011) is that the non- convergence of the critical cooling parameter could lead to large gas giants forming at longer cooling timescales, which implies shorter orbital radii. While the effect of shifting the inner boundary of gravitational instability would be minimal in the case of a single system, the effect on a large population could be more significant. If such a shift becomes more significant it could affect whether the formation regime of gravitational instability is in fact as restricted as observations seem to indicate. The fragmentation boundary using the cooling scheme presented here shows a significant change compared to that of Gammie (2001) and others. This means that the planet formation by disk instability is more restric- tive than previously thought and certainly not heading in the direction of longer cooling timescales. This keeps the formation region of gravitational instability in a narrow region where the dominant theory for planet formation cannot form planets fast enough by the current under- standing (Janson et al., 2011, 2012). 9 5.3. Limitations In this investigation, only a small modification has been made to the physics of the circumstellar disk and should not be expected to be a final solution to the con- vergence issue regarding gravitational instability. There are still some drawbacks to this approach though, as numerous assumptions and simplifications were made for the sake of efficient computation of high resolution physics and these might influence the evolution of the disk simulation as well as the fragmentation criteria. As local simulations, these results do not take into account global parameters like accretion or long-range interactions, offering only a limited view of the disk. Therefore, these simulations do not take into consider- ation the chance that fragments may migrate or consider how the disk got to that state (Kratter & Murray-Clay, 2011). Fortunately, this does not seem to have a sig- nificant effect on the results of fragmentation criteria, with both local and global simulations in agreement on fragmentation criteria in general in its previous imple- mentation (Durisen et al., 2007). Radiative transfer is a more physically complete de- scription of the cooling in the disk, but due to its relation to realistic opacities and the need for an additional di- mension for effective simulation makes it a complicated option. Implementing radiative transfer in addition to adding a vertical computational direction significantly increases the amount of processing power needed for res- olutions similar to what is implemented here. Using a simple cooling timescale in 3D leads to the same fragmen- tation behavior as Gammie (2001) (Mej´ıa et al., 2005), but including radiative transfer has not been shown to lead to consistent fragmentation, with cooling by radia- tive transfer too slow to form fragments as in Cai et al. (2006) and Boley et al. (2006), but not in Boss (2001). Questions have been raised about the razor-thin disk approximation and the calculation of self-gravity in such an approximation with Young & Clarke (2015) finding that the fragmentation boundary depends strongly on the gravitational smoothing used. Some studies of self- gravitating disks are smoothed on the grid scale (includ- ing those carried out here) which exaggerate the strength of self-gravity on small scales and may cause fragmenta- tion at longer cooling timescales at higher resolutions and may be the cause of the non-convergence of the fragmen- tation boundary. There are still some improvements which can be made to simulations which use simple cooling. A stronger de- pendence of the cooling timescale on surface density is possible due to an additional factor of Σ in the energy density U of equation (22). While opacity remains in- dependent of surface density at low temperatures, the temperature dependence varies greatly at low tempera- tures (Bell & Lin, 1993) and is difficult to model with this simple cooling prescription. For this reason we have only considered surface density in the cooling timescale and a more complete description would handle the changing temperature dependence of opacity. 6. CONCLUSIONS The current understanding of planet formation is that core accretion is the dominant planet forming process. Core accretion shows the ability to form terrestrial and 10 gaseous planets in a wide range of sizes in regions nearby the central star. But this mechanism does not explain the formation of a few gas giant planets that have formed at very large radii where core accretion takes far too long to occur before the gas in the disk is blown away. Thus, gravitational instability shows the ability to fill this niche by forming massive gas giant planets at radii beyond 50 au. This picture of planet formation is generally well- formed, but recent results had suggested that it is not as clear as believed. Since gravitational instability showed to occur at shorter radii than expected, its formation re- gion encroached on that of core accretion, possibly blur- ring the lines formation regions of the two mechanisms. We have carried out 2D hydrodynamic simulations of self-gravitating disks which show: • At low resolutions, a cooling timescale with sur- face density dependency results in a disk more sta- ble to fragmentation by self-gravity, with a critical cooling timescale around β ≈ 0.5. This means no clumps had a local cooling time short enough to overcome disruption from tidal shear. • The increased stability we find in our simula- tions suggests fragmentation preferentially in re- gions with short thermal relaxation times. • At our highest resolution however, simulations fragment even for long cooling timescales (up to β = 10) indicating that our approach with a sur- face density dependent cooling timescale did not result in convergence of the fragmentation bound- ary. • Many of the gravitoturbulent simulations are sta- ble up to α = 1, with the gravitational stress com- ponent dominating the Reynolds component, and thus stable to very short cooling timescales. For these reasons we have not found convergence of the fragmentation boundary by using a cooling timescale dependent on the surface density to mimic the effects of varying optical depth. The authors thank the referee for their thorough and useful comments. We would like to thank the other mem- bers of the theory of planet and star formation group, in particular Andreas Schreiber, for their useful advice, pa- tience and help with this project. We would also like to thank Ken Rice for his help in setting up the Pencil Code. Our simulations shown were run on the THEO cluster at the Rechenzentrum Garching (RZG) of the Max Planck Society and the JUQUEEN cluster of the Julich Super- computing Centre (Stephan & Docter, 2015). REFERENCES Armitage, P. J. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 195 Balbus, S. A. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 1999, ApJ, 20, 650 Bell, K. R. & Lin, D. N. C. 1993, ApJ, 427, 987 Bodenheimer, P. & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, ARE&PS, 30, 113 Boley, A. C., Mej´ıa, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Cai, K., Pickett, M. K., & D'Alessio, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 517 Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836 -- . 2001, ApJ, 563, 367 Brandenburg, A. 2001, in Advances in Non-linear Dynamos, ed. A. Ferriz-Mas & M. Nunez (London: Taylor and Francis), 269 Cai, K., Durisen, R. H., & Michael, S. 2006, ApJL, 636, L149 Chandrasekhar, S. 1963, ApJ, 138, 1182 Cossins, P., Lodato, G., & Clarke, C. J. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1157 Durisen, R. H., Boss, A. P., Mayer, L., Nelson, A. F., Quinn, T., & Rice, W. K. M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 607 Gammie, C. F. 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Goldreich, P. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125 Hawley, J. F., Gammie, C. F., & Balbus, S. A. 1995, ApJ, 440, Hubeny, I. 1990, ApJ, 351, 632 Janson, M., Bonavita, M., Klahr, H., & Lafreniere, D. 2011, ApJ, 742 736, 89 Janson, M., Bonavita, M., Klahr, H., Lafreniere, D., Jayawardhana, J., & Zinnecker, H. 2012, ApJ, 745, 4 Johnson, B. M. & Gammie, C. F. 2003, ApJ, 597, 131 Kratter, K. M. & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2011, ApJ, 740, 1 Kratter, K. M., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Youdin, A. N. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1375 Laughlin, G., Korchagin, V., & Adams, F. C. 1998, ApJ, 504, 945 Lodato, G. & Clarke, C. J. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2735 Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T., & Zuckerman, B. 2008, Science, 322, 1348 1098 Mej´ıa, A. C., Durisen, R. H., & Pickett, M. K. 2005, ApJ, 619, Meru, F. & Bate, M. R. 2011, MNRAS, 427, L1 Mordasini, C., Klahr, H., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., & Dittkrist, K.-M. 2010, in Circumstellar Disks and Planets: Science Cases for the Second Generation VLTI Instrumentation, ed. S. Wolf, 23 Paardekooper, S.-J. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3286 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Pringle, J. E. 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137 Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJL, 621, L69 -- . 2015, ApJ, 804, 62 Rameau, J., Chauvin, G., Boccaletti, A., Quanz, S. P., Bonnefoy, M., Girard, J. H., Delorme, P., Desidera, S., Klahr, H., Mordasini, C., Dumas, C., Bonavita, M., Meshkat, T., Bailey, V., & Kenworthy, M. A. 2013, ApJL, 772, L15 Rice, W. K. M., Armitage, P. J., Mamatsashvili, G. R., Lodato, G., & Clarke, C. J. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1356 Rice, W. K. M., Lodato, G., & Armitage, P. J. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L56 Rice, W. K. M., Paardekooper, S.-J., Forgan, D. H., & Armitage, P. J. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1593 Safronov, V. S. 1969, Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and Formation of the Earth and Planets (Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations), 212 Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Shi, J.-M. & Chiang, E. 2013, ApJ, 764, 20 Stephan, M. & Docter, J. 2015, Journal of large scale computing Stone, J. M. & Norman, M. L. 1992, ApJS, 80, 753 Tomley, L., Cassen, P. M., & Steiman-Cameron, T. Y. 1991, ApJ, Tomley, L., Steiman-Cameron, T. Y., & Cassen, P. M. 1994, ApJ, facilities, 1, A1 382, 530 422, 850 Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Vorobyov, E. I. & Basu, S. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 822 Vorobyov, E. I., Lin, D. N. C., & Guedel, M. 2015, A&A, 573, A5 Young, M. D. & Clarke, C. J. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3987
1201.6291	1	1201	2012-01-30T17:24:49	Model for the Production of CO Cameron band emission in Comet 1P/Halley	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.space-ph" ]	The abundance of CO2 in comets has been derived using CO Cameron band (a3pi --> X1Sigma+) emission assuming that photodissociative excitation of CO2 is the main production process of CO(a3pi). On comet 1P/Halley the Cameron (1-0) band has been observed by International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) on several days in March 1986. A coupled chemistry-emission model is developed for comet 1P/Halley to assess the importance of various production and loss mechanisms of CO(a3pi) and to calculate the intensity of Cameron band emission on different days of IUE observation. Two different solar EUV flux models, EUVAC of Richards et al. (1994) and SOLAR2000 of Tobiska (2004), and different relative abundances of CO and CO2, are used to evaluate the role of photon and photoelectron in producing CO molecule in a3pi state in the cometary coma. It is found that in comet 1P/Halley 60--70% of the total intensity of the Cameron band emission is contributed by electron impact excitation of CO and CO2, while the contribution from photodissociative excitation of CO2 is small (20--30%). Thus, in the comets where CO and CO2 relative abundances are comparable, the Cameron band emission is largely governed by electron impact excitation of CO, and not by the photodissociative excitation of CO2 as assumed earlier. Model calculated Cameron band 1-0 emission intensity (40 R) is consistent with the observed IUE slit-averaged brightness (37 +/- 6 R) using EUVAC model solar flux on 13 March 1986, and also on other days of observations. Since electron impact excitation is the major production mechanism, the Cameron emission can be used to derive photoelectron density in the inner coma rather than the CO2 abundance.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Model for the Production of CO Cameron band emission in Comet 1P/Halley Susarla Raghuram and Anil Bhardwaj∗ Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum 695022, India. 2 1 0 2 n a J 0 3 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 9 2 6 . 1 0 2 1 : v i X r a Abstract The abundance of CO2 in comets has been derived using CO Cameron band (a3Π → X1Σ+) emission assuming that photodissociative excitation of CO2 is the main production process of CO(a3Π). On comet 1P/Halley the Cameron (1-0) band has been observed by International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) on several days in March 1986. A coupled chemistry-emission model is developed for comet 1P/Halley to assess the importance of various production and loss mechanisms of CO(a3Π) and to calculate the intensity of Cameron band emission on different days of IUE observation. Two different solar EUV flux models, EUVAC of Richards et al. (1994) and SOLAR2000 of Tobiska (2004), and different relative abundances of CO and CO2, are used to evaluate the role of photon and photoelectron in producing CO molecule in a3Π state in the cometary coma. It is found that in comet 1P/Halley 60–70% of the total intensity of the Cameron band emission is contributed by electron impact excitation of CO and CO2, while the contribution from photodissociative excitation of CO2 is small (20–30%). Thus, in the comets where CO and CO2 relative abundances are comparable, the Cameron band emission is largely governed by electron impact excitation of CO, and not by the photodissociative excitation of CO2 as assumed earlier. Model calculated Cameron band 1-0 emission intensity (40 R) is consistent with the observed IUE slit-averaged brightness (37 ± 6 R) using EUVAC model solar flux on 13 March 1986, and also on other days of observations. Since electron impact excitation is the major production mechanism, the Cameron emission can be used to derive photoelectron density in the inner coma rather than the CO2 abundance. Keywords: CO molecule, comet 1P/Halley, Cameron band emission, UV emission, photochemistry 1. Introduction Ejecting neutral gas and dust into space, comets cre- ate extensive and unique atmospheres in the interplan- etary space. Interaction of solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation with cometary species causes spectrum of different emissions. Spectroscopic observations of comets in the UV region by space-based telescopes give information about composition, abundance, and spatial distribution of neutral species in the cometary coma (e.g., Feldman et al., 2004). The number densities of CO2 and CO in cometary coma have been derived using emissions from the dissociative products which can be produced in metastable states. Assuming photodisso- ciative excitation is the main production mechanism in populating the a3Π metastable state of CO, the Cameron band (a3Π → X1Σ+) emission has been used to estimate ∗Corresponding author: waj [email protected] anil [email protected], bhard- Preprint submitted to Planetary and Space Science the abundance of CO2 in comets (Weaver et al., 1994; Weaver et al., 1997; Feldman et al., 1997). The observation of Cameron band of CO molecule in the coma of comet 103P/Hartley 2 (Weaver et al., 1994) by Hubble Space Telescope (HST) gave an in- citement to re-examine the data of several comets ob- served by the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) satellite. Cameron band (1-0) emission at 1993 Å is observed in 4 comets, including comet 1P/Halley, in the IUE spectra (Feldman et al., 1997). The Cameron band (0-0) and (0-1) emissions at 2063 and 2155 Å, re- spectively, could not be observed since they fall in the low sensitivity end of the IUE long-wavelength camera. Since the excited upper state (a3Π) of Cameron band emission is metastable and its lifetime is very small (∼3 ms, Gilijamse et al., 2007) compared to lifetime of CO2 molecule (∼135 hours at 1 AU, Huebner et al., 1992), the CO(a3Π) molecule can travel a distance of few me- ters only in the cometary coma before de-exciting into ground state (X1Σ+) via emitting photons. Hence, the July 3, 2018 Cameron band emission can be used to probe CO2 dis- tribution, and thus its abundance in the coma, provided it is produced only through photodissociation of CO2. Besides photons, the solar EUV-generated photoelec- trons also play a significant role in driving the chem- istry of cometary species in the coma. The importance of photoelectrons in excitation, dissociation, and ioniza- tion of various cometary species and subsequent effects on emissions in the inner coma are discussed in sev- eral works (e.g., Cravens and Green, 1978; Ip, 1985; Boice et al., 1986; Korosmezey et al., 1987; Bhard- waj et al., 1990, 1996; Haider et al., 1993; Haberli et al., 1996; Bhardwaj, 1999, 2003; Haider and Bhard- waj, 2005; Campbell and Brunger, 2009; Feldman et al., 2009; Bhardwaj and Raghuram, 2011a,b). To explain the Cameron band emission in comet 103P/Hartley 2, Weaver et al. (1994) considered five possible produc- tion mechanisms of CO(a3Π) molecule. The modelled Cameron band emission of CO molecule by Weaver et al. (1994) suggested that 60% of total CO(a3Π) pro- duction can be through photodissociative excitation of CO2; the remaining was attributed to other excitation processes. Feldman et al. (1997) assumed that pho- todissociative excitation of CO2 is the only source of Cameron band emission in comet 1P/Halley. Recent calculations of Bhardwaj and Raghuram (2011a) have demonstrated that in the comet 103P/Hartley 2, 60 to 90% of CO(a3Π) production is through the photoelec- tron impact of CO2 and CO and that the contribution of photodissociation of CO2 is quite small. The derived rates of electron impact dissociation of CO2 producing CO(a3Π) by Feldman et al. (2009) show that photodis- sociation can be comparable with electron impact exci- tation in producing Cameron band emission. However, the comet 103P/Hartley 2 is depleted in CO (relative abundance <1%). But in the case of comet 1P/Halley the CO abundance is relatively higher compared to that on the 103P/Hartley 2, and hence the contribution due to direct excitation of CO by electron impact would be much larger. There are several observations of CO in comet 1P/Halley, as well as in other comets, which suggest that CO is produced directly from the nucleus as well as having prevailed distributed sources in the cometary coma (Eberhardt et al., 1987; Eberhardt, 1999; DiSanti et al., 2003; Cottin and Fray, 2008). The measured number density of CO by neutral mass spectrometer on Giotto spacecraft, which flew through the coma of 1P/Halley, is ≤7% relative to water at 1000 km come- tocentric distance. This relative abundance is higher (≤15%) at larger distances (2 × 104 km) in the coma (Eberhardt et al., 1987; Eberhardt, 1999; Festou, 1999). 2 This increase in abundance can be explained by dissoci- ation of CO-bounded species and also through heating of several refractory grains by sunlight. Other cometary species like H2CO, C3O2, POM (polyoxymethylene, or polyformaldehyde), CH3OH, and CO2 can also produce CO molecules in photodissociation process (see Green- berg and Li, 1998; Cottin and Fray, 2008, and references there in). However, there are no literature reports on the production of CO(a3Π) from CO-bearing species, like H2CO, CH3OH, and C3O2, via photodissociation or electron impact dissociative excitation. This paper will demonstrate that in comets where CO2 and CO relative abundances are comparable, the photoelectron impact excitation of CO plays a major role in controlling the brightness of Cameron band, and not the photodissociation of CO2 as assumed previously. Since the Cameron band emission is forbidden and elec- tron impact is the major excitation mechanism, this Reanalysis of the IUE data on comet 1P/Halley showed 5 observations of the Cameron 1-0 band emis- sion, which span over a 10-days period in March 1986; the intensity of 1-0 emission varied by a factor of about 4 from lowest value of 20±6 to highest value of 65±9 Rayleighs (Feldman et al., 1997). Assuming that the production of Cameron band emission is only through photodissociation of CO2, Feldman et al. (1997) derived the CO2 abundances of ∼2 to 6%, and also the CO2/CO abundance ratio. The production of CO(a3Π) is mainly associated with spatial distribution of CO2 and CO molecules in the coma. We have recently developed a model for the chemistry of CO(a3Π) on comet 103P/Hartley 2 (Bhard- waj and Raghuram, 2011a). In the present paper this coupled chemistry model has been employed to study the production of Cameron band emissions on comet 1P/Halley. The contributions of major production and loss processes of CO(a3Π) in comet 1P/Halley are eval- uated for different relative abundances of CO and CO2. The photochemistry in the cometary coma is driven by solar UV-EUV radiation. The solar UV flux is known to vary considerably both with the 27-day solar rota- tion period and with the 11-year solar activity cycle. Since the continuous measurements of solar EUV fluxes are not available for different cometary observations, one has to depend on the empirical solar EUV mod- els. To assess the impact of solar EUV flux on the cal- culated brightness of Cameron band emission we have taken two most commonly used solar EUV flux mod- els, namely EUVAC model of Richards et al. (1994) and SOLAR2000 v.2.3.6 (S2K) model of Tobiska (2004). The solar EUV flux from these two models for 13 March 1986 are shown in Fig. 1. emission is suitable to track photoelectron flux in the inner cometary coma rather than the CO2 abundance. We have also studied the sensitivity of calculations as- sociated with variation in input solar flux and electron impact excitation cross sections of CO2 and CO in esti- mating the intensity of Cameron band emission. 2. Model The neutral parent species considered in the model are H2O, CO2, and CO. The density of neutral parent species in the coma is calculated using Haser's formula, which assumes spherical distribution of gaseous envi- ronment around the nucleus. The number density ni(r) of ith species in the coma at a cometocentric distance r is given by ni(r) = fiQp 4πvir2 (e−βi/r) (1) Here Qp is the total gas production rate of the comet, vi is the average velocity of neutral species taken as 1 km s−1, βi is scale length (βH2O = 8.2 × 104 km, βCO2 = 5.0 × 105 km, and βCO = 1.4 × 106 km) and fi is frac- tional abundance of ith species. Calculations are made for comet 1P/Halley taking total gas production rate as 6.9 × 1029 s−1, which has been observed by Giotto mis- sion (Krankowsky et al., 1986). Since cometary coma is dominated by water, 80% of total production rate is assumed to be H2O. The in situ gas measurements at comet 1P/Halley made by Giotto Neutral Mass Spectrometer (NMS) on the encounter date 13 March 1986 showed that CO2 abundance is 3.5% of water (Krankowsky et al., 1986). On the same day, based on IUE observation, Feldman et al. (1997) derived CO2 abundance of 4.3%. Eberhardt et al. (1987) suggested that below 1000 km, nuclear rate of CO production can be 7% of water. The radial profile of CO calculated by Eberhardt et al. (1987) showed al- most a constant value of CO relative abundance (≤15%) above 15000 km. This increase in CO abundance is at- tributed to the presence of an extended source for CO in the cometary coma. The IUE-derived average produc- tion rate of CO is 4.7% (Feldman et al., 1997). We have taken 4% CO2 and 7% CO directly coming from nu- cleus as the standard input for the model. We have also considered extended CO density profile directly from Giotto NMS observation (Eberhardt et al., 1987). Fur- ther, the relative abundances of CO2 and CO are varied to assess the effect on the intensity of Cameron band emission and different production channels of CO(a3Π). spectrum Q(E, r, θ), at energy E, cometocentric distance r, photoelectron primary energy The and solar zenith angle θ, is calculated by degrading the solar UV-EUV radiation in the cometary coma using the following equation Q(E, r, θ) = ni(r) σI (cid:90) λ (cid:88) (cid:88) i i i (λ) I∞(λ) exp[−τ(r, θ, λ)] dλ(2) (cid:90) ∞ ni(r(cid:48))dr(cid:48) (3) where, τ(r, θ, λ) = σA i (λ) secθ r Here σA i (λ) and σI i (λ) are absorption and ionization cross sections, respectively, of ith species at wavelength λ, ni(r) is its neutral gas density calculated using the equation 1, and τ(r, θ, λ) is optical depth of the medium. I∞(λ) is unattenuated solar flux at the top of atmosphere at wavelength λ. All calculations are made at solar zenith angle 00. The photoabsorption and photoioniza- tion cross sections of H2O, CO2, and CO are taken from Shunk and Nagy (2009). The steady state photoelectron fluxes are calculated using the Analytical Yield Spectrum (AYS) approach, which is based on the Monte Carlo method. Details of the AYS approach are given in several of the previ- ous papers (Singhal and Haider, 1984; Bhardwaj et al., 1990, 1996; Singhal and Bhardwaj, 1991; Bhardwaj and Singhal, 1993; Bhardwaj, 1999, 2003; Bhardwaj and Michael, 1999a,b; Haider and Bhardwaj, 2005; Bhard- waj and Jain, 2009). We have used two dimensional yield spectra to calculated photoelectron flux fp(E, r) as a function of energy E and cometocentric distance r (cid:90) ∞ w Q(E, r, θ)Uc(E, Eo) (cid:80) ni(r)σiT (E) fp(E, r) = (4) where Q(E, r, θ) is primary photoelectron production rate calculated using equation 2. σiT (E) is total in- elastic electron impact cross section at energy E for the ith species whose number density is ni(r). The lower limit of integration w is minimum excitation energy and Uc(E, Eo) is two dimensional composite yield spectra (Singhal and Haider, 1984; Bhardwaj et al., 1990). The total inelastic electron impact cross sections for water are taken from Rao et al. (1995), and those for CO2 and CO are taken from Jackman et al. (1977). The loss process of photoelectrons through collisions with thermal electrons is considered using the following formula neσ e f f e−e = neβ(E, ne, T) E W (5) where ne is the thermal electron density, E is the energy of photoelectron, and W is the average energy lost per 3 collision between photoelectron and the thermal elec- tron. The expression β is given by McCormick et al. (1976). More details are provided in Bhardwaj et al. (1990). The calculated photoelectron fluxes for the two solar EUV flux models at 1000 km are shown in Fig. 2. The electron impact volume production rates of dif- ferent ions from neutral species and volume excitation rates for CO(a3Π) state from CO2 and CO are calcu- lated using photoelectron flux fp(E, r) and electron im- pact excitation cross section σik of ith species and kth state as V(r) = ni(r) fp(E, r) σik(E)dE (6) (cid:90) 100 w The cross sections for electron impact dissociative ion- ization of water are taken from Itikawa and Mason (2005), for CO2 from Bhardwaj and Jain (2009), and for CO from McConkey et al. (2008). Table 1 presents the reactions involved in the produc- tion and loss of CO(a3Π). Huebner et al. (1992) calcu- lated the cross section for photodissociative excitation of CO2 producing CO in a3Π state using total absorp- tion cross section and the yield measured by Lawrence (1972). We averaged these cross section values over 50 Å bin intervals to calculate photodissociative excita- tion rate using solar flux from EUVAC and S2K models; this cross section is shown in Fig. 3. The cross section for electron impact excitation of CO in the a3Π state is taken from Jackman et al. (1977) and for dissocia- tive excitation of CO2 producing CO(a3Π) is taken from Bhardwaj and Jain (2009). These cross sections are pre- sented in Fig. 2. To estimate the effect of electron im- pact cross sections on emissions, we have used the elec- tron impact cross sections recommended by Avakyan et al. (1998) for the above two processes, which are also shown in Fig. 2. The electron temperature profile, re- quired for dissociative recombination reactions, is taken from Korosmezey et al. (1987). 3. Results and discussions 3.1. Cameron band emission The first clear observation of Cameron band emis- sion of CO molecule is made in comets 103P/Hartley 2 and C/1992 T2 Shoemaker-Levy (Weaver et al., 1994), which was followed by detection in several other comets, including 1P/Halley, in the IUE repro- cessed data (Feldman et al., 1997). Assuming that the photodissociative excitation of CO2 is the ma- jor production mechanism of Cameron band emission, Weaver et al. (1994) derived the abundance of CO2 4 in comet 103P/Hartley 2. Recently, Bhardwaj and Raghuram (2011a) have demonstrated that on comet 103P/Hartley 2 the photoelectron impact dissociative excitation of CO2 followed by photoelectron impact of CO are the major production processes of Cameron band, and not the photodissociative excitation of CO2 as suggested by Weaver et al. (1994). Since comet 103P/Hartley 2 is CO depleted (rel- ative abundance ≤1%), the contribution to Cameron band emission through dissociative excitation of CO2 by EUV-generated photoelectrons is more important. However, in case of comets where CO abundance is larger, like 1P/Halley, the contribution of CO to the Cameron band emission would be significant. The de- rived CO2/CO abundance ratios for several IUE obser- vations of comet 1P/Halley showed that the abundance of CO can be even double that of CO2 (Feldman et al., 1997). The calculated production rate profiles of CO(a3Π) using solar EUVAC and S2K models for relative abun- dance of 4% CO2 and 7% CO are shown in Figure 4. For both solar EUV flux models, the peak production rate occurs at cometocentric distance ∼20 km. The major production mechanism of CO(a3Π) is the photoelectron impact of CO, whose contribution is ∼70% to the total CO(a3Π) production. On using the S2K solar flux, the calculated total production rate is 1.5 times larger than that obtained using the EUVAC flux. This variation is mainly due to the difference in the input solar EUV flux (cf. Fig. 1) and subsequently EUV-generated photoelec- tron flux (cf. Fig. 2). In the wavelength region 700–1050 Å, the S2K model solar flux is a factor of ∼2.5 larger than the EUVAC model (cf. Fig. 1). As shown in Fig- ure 3, the photodissociative excitation cross section of CO2 producing CO(a3Π) maximizes around 880–1000 Å. Further, the S2K solar flux in the 1000–1050 Å wave- length bin is around 20 times higher than the EUVAC flux. The average cross section value for photodisso- ciation of CO2 producing CO(a3Π) in the wavelength region 1000–1050 Å is comparable with the peak value around 900 Å (cf. Figure 3). Moreover, in the inner cometary coma, below come- tocentric distance of 50 km, the optical depth for so- lar flux at wavelengths below 200 Å and above 1000 Å is smaller compared to other wavelengths because of smaller absorption cross sections of neutral species (mainly water). The rate of photodissociative excitation of CO2 molecule into CO(a3Π) mainly depends on the degradation of solar flux in the wavelength region 850– 1050 Å. Hence, in the innermost coma (≤50 km), for a given relative abundance of CO2, the production rate of CO(a3Π) via photodissociation of CO2 is determined by the solar flux in the wavelength bin 1000–1050 Å and at wavelengths 1025.7 Å (H I) and 1031.9 Å (O VI). The calculated photodissociation rates of CO2 pro- ducing CO(a3Π) at 0.9 AU are 1.66 × 10−7 s−1 and 5.28 × 10−7 s−1 using EUVAC and S2K solar fluxes, respec- tively, on 13 March 1986. From Figure 2 it is seen that the calculated steady state photoelectron flux using two solar flux models dif- fer in magnitude by a factor of 2. Since the cross section for electron impact of CO producing CO(a3Π) peaks at lower energies (∼10 eV) where the photoelectron flux is also high (∼108 cm−2 s−1 eV−1 sr−1; cf. Fig. 2), the electron impact excitation of CO is a major production source of Cameron band emission. At larger (>5000 km) cometocentric distances, due to decrease in pho- toelectron flux, the photodissociative excitation of CO2 starts becoming an increasingly important process (cf. Fig. 4). Contributions from dissociative recombination reactions and resonance fluorescence of CO are more than two orders of magnitude lower compared to major production processes. Since the lifetime of CO(a3Π) is about ∼3 ms, the quenching of the excited a3Π metastable state by vari- ous cometary species is not very efficient. The calcu- lated loss rate profiles of CO(a3Π) for various processes are shown in Figure 5. The radiative de-excitation is the main loss process. Very close to the nucleus, the loss due to quenching of CO(a3Π) by water is compa- rable to the radiative de-excitation. Quenching by wa- ter molecule would be a more significant loss process of CO(a3Π) in the higher water production rate comets, like Hale-Bopp or when the comet is much closer to the Sun than 1 AU. The calculated number density profile of CO(a3Π) is shown in Fig. 6. Above 100 km, the density profile of CO(a3Π) mostly following the number density profiles of the parent species CO2 and CO. The above calculated total production rate is inte- grated up to 105 km to obtain the height-integrated col- umn intensity of Cameron band emission which is pre- sented in Table 2. We also calculated the line of sight in- tensity at a given projected distance z from the cometary nucleus using production rates of different excitation processes of CO(a3Π) as I(z) = 2 V(s) ds (7) (cid:90) R z where s is abscissa along the line of sight and V(s) is the corresponding emission rate. The maximum limit of integration R is taken as 105 km. These brightness profiles are then averaged over the projected area 6600 × 11000 km2 corresponding to the IUE slit dimension 9(cid:48)(cid:48).07 × 15(cid:48)(cid:48).1 centred on nucleus of comet 1P/Halley 5 on 13 March 1986 at geocentric distance 0.96 AU. The volume emission rate for 3 transitions (0-0, 1-0, and 0- 1) of the Cameron band are calculated using the follow- ing formula Vν(cid:48)ν(cid:48)(cid:48)(r) = qoν(cid:48)(Aν(cid:48)ν(cid:48)(cid:48) / Aν(cid:48)ν(cid:48)(cid:48))V(r)exp(−τ) (8) (cid:88) ν(cid:48)(cid:48) where V(r) is total volume excitation rate of CO(a3Π) at a given cometocentric distance r, given by equation 6, qoν(cid:48) is the Franck-Condon factor for transition, Aν(cid:48)ν(cid:48)(cid:48) is the Einstein transition probability from upper state ν(cid:48) to lower state ν(cid:48)(cid:48), and τ is the optical depth. Since reso- nance fluorescence is not an effective excitation mecha- nism for the Cameron band, the cometary coma can be safely assumed to be optically thin. The Franck-Condon factors are taken from Nicholls (1962) and branching ra- tios from Conway (1981). The calculated brightness profiles for each of the pro- duction processes along projected distances from nu- cleus are shown in Figure 7. At 100 km projected distance, the contribution due to photoelectron impact excitation of CO to the total Cameron band intensity is about a factor 4 higher than the dissociative exci- tation processes of CO2, while contributions of other production processes are around 2 orders of magnitude smaller. Around 1000 km projected distance, both pho- todissociative excitation and electron impact dissocia- tive excitation of CO2 are contributing equally to the total Cameron band intensity. The photodissociative ex- citation of CO2 dominates the electron impact excitation processes above 5000 km. The calculated relative contributions of (1-0), (0-0), and (0-1) bands to the total Cameron band are 13.9%, 10.4%, and 14.5%, respectively. The intensities of (1- 0), (0-0) and (0-1) Cameron bands of CO molecule are calculated as a function of relative abundances of CO2 and CO. The calculated percentage contributions of dif- ferent production processes of Cameron band at three projected distances for two different solar flux mod- els are presented in Table 2. The IUE-observed 1-0 Cameron band emission on 13 March 1986 is 37±6 Rayleighs. Using EUVAC solar flux as input, our model cal- culated 1-0 Cameron band emission intensity for the relative abundance 4% CO2 and extended distribution of CO is 59 Rayleighs which is higher than IUE ob- served intensity by a factor 1.3 to 2. Taking CO2 abun- dance as 4% and CO abundance as 7% from nucleus, the calculated 1-0 intensity is 51 Rayleighs, which is higher than the IUE-observed value by a factor 1.2 to 1.6. The calculated intensity for 3% CO2 and 7% CO is 46 Rayleighs, which is consistent only with the up- per limit of IUE-observed intensity. In all the above cases, below 1000 km projected distances, the contribu- tion of photodissociation of CO2 to the Cameron band emission is <15%, while electron impact of CO con- tribute 65 to 80%. We have also calculated the intensity of Cameron band taking the Feldman et al. (1997) de- rived abundances of 4.3% CO2 and 4.7% CO. The cal- culated intensity of 1-0 Cameron band emission in this case is 40 R, which is consistent with the observed value of 37 ± 6 R on 13 March 1986 (cf. Table 3). The cal- culated 1-0 Cameron band emission intensity at various projected distances in the IUE-slit field of view is pre- sented in the Figure 8; The circular contours and gray scale provide information on brightness variation. The calculated results using S2K solar flux model for the above discussed relative compositions of CO2 and CO are also presented in Table 2. The calculated intensities are higher by a factor of ∼1.5, which is mainly due to higher input solar flux and subsequently EUV-produced photoelectron's flux (cf. Figs. 1 and 2). Using OH 3085 Å emission observation by IUE, Tozzi et al. (1998) derived water production rates for different days of IUE observations (1986 March 9, 11, 13, 16, 18) around Giotto encounter period. The wa- ter production rate derived on 13 March 1986, the clos- est approach day of Giotto spacecraft, was 5.9 × 1029 s−1. Feldman et al. (1997) have considered these de- rived production rates of H2O to estimate relative abun- dances of CO2 and CO for corresponding days of ob- servation. We have calculated the intensity of Cameron band for different days of IUE observations taking the same H2O, CO2, and CO production rates as quoted in Feldman et al. (1997). The solar EUV fluxes on each day of observation was obtained by using EUVAC and S2K solar flux models and scaling them according to the heliocentric distance of comet. The IUE projected field of view is calculated for IUE slit dimension used in observation, which vary according to the geocentric distance of the comet in March 1986. The calculated in- tensities of Cameron 1-0, 0-0, 0-1 bands and percentage contributions from different production process to the IUE slit-averaged brightness are presented Table 3. The calculated intensity of 1-0 emission is consistent with the IUE-observation for the EUVAC solar flux model, while it is higher by a factor of 1.5 on using S2K so- lar flux. The calculations presented in Table 3 show that for a change in the CO2/CO abundance ratio by a factor of 2, the total photoelectron impact excitation contribution changes by only ∼10%; it varies from 68 to 76% (60 to 69%) of the total IUE-observed intensity for EUVAC (S2K) solar flux model. The photoelectron impact excitation of CO alone contribute around 45 to 55% (40 to 60%) to the total Cameron band intensity when EUVAC (S2K) solar flux is used. The contribu- tion of photodissociation of CO2 to the IUE-observed Cameron band brightness is around 20% (30%) for EU- VAC (S2K) solar flux model when the abundances of CO and CO2 in the comet are almost equal. These com- putation show that in the IUE field of view the pho- toelectron is a major production source (60-75% con- tribution) for the Cameron band emission, whereas the contribution due to photons is small (20-35%). The calculations presented in Tables 2 and 3 renders that in case of comets where CO2/CO abundance ratio is closer to 1 or larger than 1, the emission intensity of Cameron band is mainly controlled by the abundance of CO in the inner cometary coma. The photoelectron im- pact excitation of CO is the main production mechanism for the production of Cameron band emission, but not the photodissociative excitation of CO2 as suggested or assumed in earlier studies (Weaver et al., 1994; Weaver et al., 1997; Feldman et al., 1997). Thus, in comets that have sufficient CO abundance the electron impact exci- tation of CO producing CO(a3Π) can be an efficient ex- citation mechanism for Cameron band emission. Since Cameron emission is mainly governed by electron im- pact excitation reactions, this emission can be used to track the photoelectron density mainly in the energy range 10 to 15 eV near the nucleus. In the case of comet 103P/Hartley 2, which has an order of magnitude lower gas production rate and much lower CO (abundance < 1%) than comet 1P/Halley, the dissociative recombination of CO+ 2 becomes a compet- ing production mechanism at larger (>104 km) come- tocentric distances (Bhardwaj and Raghuram, 2011a). However, in comparison, on comet 1P/Halley the pro- duction rates of H2O, CO2, and CO are so high that the photon and photoelectron impact reactions are dominant throughout the inner cometary coma. 3.2. Effect of electron impact cross section In this section we will discuss the impact of cross sec- tions for electron impact excitation of CO(a3Π) from CO2 and CO. The threshold for exciting CO molecule in the metastable a3Π state is 6 eV and the peak value of cross section occurs around 10 eV (cf. Fig. 2). The cross section for electron impact excitation of CO producing CO(a3Π) reported by Jackman et al. (1977) is theoret- ically fitted based on Born approximation and experi- mental measurements of Ajello (1971). The uncertainty associated with measurement is about 75%. However, the uncertainty in the cross section at energies less than 15 eV is 35% (Ajello, 1971), where the contribution of 6 electron impact excitation plays a major role (cf. Fig 2). The cross section measurements of Furlong and Newell (1996) differ at the peak value of cross section by a fac- tor 2 (cf. Figure 2). The threshold for dissociation of CO2 molecule into CO(a3Π) state is 11.45 eV. Ajello (1971) measured Cameron band emission cross sections in the wavelength region 1950–2500 Å by exciting CO2 molecule through electron impact. Sawada et al. (1972) concluded that these cross sections are comparable with cross sections of 12.6 eV and 13.6 eV states. The cross section value for CO(a3Π) production due to electron impact of CO2 measured at 80 eV by Erdman and Zipf (1983) is 2.4 × 10−16 cm−2. Bhardwaj and Jain (2009) modified the fitting parameters given by Jackman et al. (1977) for the excited states 12.6 eV and 13.6 eV of CO2 molecule to match cross section value measured by Erdman and Zipf (1983) at 80 eV (for more discussion on these cross sections see Ajello, 1971; Sawada et al., 1972; Bhardwaj and Jain, 2009). Avakyan et al. (1998) corrected Ajello (1971) reported cross sections based on measurements of Erdman and Zipf (1983). The differ- ence in the cross section of Avakyan et al. (1998) and Bhardwaj and Jain (2009) below 30 eV is about a factor of 2 (cf. Fig 2). Using electron impact CO(a3Π) excitation cross sec- tions from Furlong and Newell (1996) for CO and from Avakyan et al. (1998) for CO2, and using EUVAC solar flux, the calculated emission intensity of 1-0 Cameron band, for a given relative abundances of CO and CO2, is larger by a factor 2. In these calculations the contri- bution of electron impact excitation of CO is increased from 70% to 85% at cometocentric distances below 103 km and 40% to 60% at distances above 103 km. On using these cross sections, the percentage contribution of photoelectron impact excitation of CO to the total Cameron emission in the IUE-slit-averaged intensity is found to increase by 10%, but there is no significant change in electron impact excitation of CO2. In this case the contribution from photodissociative excitation of CO2 is decreased by 10%. 4. Summary Using the coupled chemistry-emission model a de- tailed study of Cameron band (a3Π → X1Σ+) emis- sion has been carried out on the comet 1P/Halley around the Giotto encounter period. The effects of change in solar flux on the production of CO(a3Π) and thus the Cameron band intensity have been evaluated by consid- ering two different solar EUV flux models, viz. EUVAC model (Richards et al., 1994) and S2K (SOLAR2000) 7 model (Tobiska, 2004). Calculations are made for dif- ferent days of IUE-observation of comet 1P/Halley. The important results from the present model calculations can be summarized as follows: • For the same day, the solar flux from the two mod- els (EUVAC & S2K) are different, and the differ- ence between them varies with wavelength. • The production rates obtained by using S2K solar flux model are higher than that of EUVAC model. The photodissociation of CO2 is larger by a factor of 2.5, while the photoelectron impact excitation is larger by a factor of ∼1.5. • The total production rate of CO(a3Π) peaks around cometocentric distance of 20 km for both solar flux models. • Throughout the inner coma the main loss mecha- nism of CO(a3Π) is radiative decay. Very close to the nucleus (< 20 km) quenching by water is also significant. • In the inner (≤ 5000 km) coma the major produc- tion mechanism of CO(a3Π) is photoelectron im- pact excitation of CO. • On using EUVAC solar flux, and abundances of CO and CO2 as derived from IUE-observation, the model calculated Cameron band 1-0 emission in- tensity (40 R) is consistent with the IUE-observed brightness (37 ± 6 R) on 13 March 1986, and also on other days of observations. However, the calcu- lated intensities are larger by a factor 1.5 when the S2K solar EUV flux is used. • For EUVAC (S2K) solar flux model, around 70% (65%) of the total intensity of Cameron band ob- served by the IUE is contributed by electron im- pact excitation of CO and CO2 molecules, while the contribution from photodissociative excitation of CO2 is about 20–30% only. • In comets having comparable CO and CO2 rela- tive abundances, the intensity of Cameron band is largely determined by the photoelectron impact ex- citation of CO, and not the photodissociative exci- tation of CO2 as suggested by earlier studies. • Since the emission intensity of Cameron band is mainly governed by electron impact reactions, this emission may be more useful to track the photo- electron density in 10–15 eV energy region in the inner coma, rather than the CO2 abundance. Acknowledgements One of the authors (SR) was supported by ISRO re- search fellowship during the period of this study. References Ajello, J. M., 1971. Emission cross sections of CO2 by electron impact in the interval 1260-4500 Å, II. J. Chem. Phys. 55, 3169–3177. doi: 10.1063/1.1676564. Avakyan, S. V., II'in, R. N., Lavrov, V. M., Ogurtsov, G. N. (Eds.), 1998. Collision Processes and Excitation of UV Emission from Planetary Atmospheric Gases: A Handbook of Cross Sections. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. Bhardwaj, A., 1999. On the role of solar EUV, photoelectrons, and auroral electrons in the chemistry of C(1D) and the production of C I 1931 Å in the inner cometary coma: A case for comet P/Halley. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 1929 – 1942. doi:10.1029/1998JE900004. Bhardwaj, A., 2003. On the solar EUV deposition in the inner coma of comets with large gas production rates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (24). doi:10.1029/2003GL018495. Bhardwaj, A., Singhal, R. P., 1993. Optical thin H Lyman alpha pro- duction on outer planets: low energy proton acceleration in parallel electric fields and neutral H atom precipitation from ring current J. Geophys. Res. 9473–9481 (98). doi:10.1029/92JA02400. Bhardwaj, A., Haider, S. A., Singhal, R. P., 1990. Auroral and pho- toelectron fluxes in cometary ionospheres. Icarus 85, 216 – 228. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90112-M. Bhardwaj, A., Haider, S. A., Singhal, R. P., 1996. Production and emissions of atomic carbon and oxygen in the inner coma of comet 1P/Halley: Role of electron impact. Icarus 120, 412 – 430. doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0061. Bhardwaj, A., Jain, S. K., 2009. Monte Carlo model of elec- tron energy degradation in a CO2 atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 114, 11309. correction doi:10.1029/2009JA014298. doi:10.1029/2009JA014298; Bhardwaj, A., Michael, M., 1999a. Monte Carlo model for elec- tron degradation in SO2 gas: Cross sections, yield spectra and efficiencies. J. Geophys. Res. 104 (10), 24713–24728. doi: 10.1029/1999JA900283. Bhardwaj, A., Michael, M., 1999b. On the excitation of Io's at- mosphere by the photoelectrons: Application of the analytical yield spectrum of SO2. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 393 – 396. doi: 10.1029/1998GL900320. Bhardwaj, A., Raghuram, S., 2011a. Model for Cameron-band emis- sion in comets: A case for the EPOXI mission target comet 103P/Hartley 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, L25 – L29. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00998.x. Bhardwaj, A., Raghuram, S., 2011b. Coupled Chemistry-Emission Model for Atomic Oxygen Green and Red-doublet Emissions in Comets: A case study for the comet C/1996 B2 Hyakutake. Astro- phys. J. (Submitted). Boice, D. C., Huebner, W. F., Keady, J. J., Schmidt, H. U., Wegmann, R., 1986. A model of comet P/Giacobini-Zinner. Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 381–384. doi:10.1029/GL013i004p00381. Campbell, L., Brunger, M. J., 2009. Electron impact excitation of the carbon monoxide in comet Hale-Bopp. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36. doi:10.1029/2008GL036641. Cravens, T. E., Green, A. E. S., 1978. Airglow from the inner comas of comets. Icarus. 33, 612–623. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(78)90193-8. Conway, R. R., 1981. Spectroscopy of the Cameron bands in doi: the Mars airglow. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4767 – 4775. 10.1029/JA086iA06p04767. 8 Cottin, H., Fray, N., 2008. Distributed sources in comets. Space Sci. Rev.doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9399-z. DiSanti, M., Mumma, M., Russo, N. D., Magee-Sauer, K., Griep, D., 2003. Evidence for a dominant native source of carbon monoxide in comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake). J. Geophys. Res. Planets 108f, 15–11. doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9399-z. Eberhardt, P., 1999. Distributed sources in comets. Space Science Rev. 90, 45–52. doi:10.1023/A:1005221309219. Eberhardt, P., Krankowsky, D., Schulte, W., Dolder, U., Lammerzahl, P., Berthelier, J. J., Woweries, J., Stubbemann, U., Hodges, R. R., Hoffman, J. H., Illiano, J. M., 1987. The CO and N2 Abundance in Comet 1P/Halley. Astron. Astrophys. 187, 481–414. Erdman, P. W., Zipf, E. C., 1983. Electron-impact excitation of the Cameron system (a3Π → X1Σ) of CO. Planet. Spece. Sci. 31, 317 – 321. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(83)90082-X. Feldman, P. D., Cochran, A. L., Combi, M. R., 2004. Spectroscopic investigations of fragment species in the coma: in comets II. M. C. Festou, H. A. Weaver, & H. U. Keller (Ed.)(Tucson: Univ. of Arizona). Feldman, P. D., Festou, M. C., Tozzi, G. P., Feldman, P. D., Weaver, H. A., 1997. The CO2/CO abundance ratio in 1P/Halley and several other comets observed by IUE and HST. Astrophys. J. 475, 829– 834. doi:10.1086/303553. Feldman, P. D., Lupu, R. E., McCandliss, S. R., Weaver, H. A., 2009. The far ultraviolet spectral signatures of formaldehyde and car- bon dioxide in comets . Astrophys J. 699 (2), 1104–1112. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1104. Festou, M. C., 1999. Distributed sources in comets. Space Science Rev. 90, 53 – 67. doi:10.1023/A:1005225426057. Furlong, J. M., Newell, W. R., 1996. Total cross section measurement for the metastable (a3Π) state in CO. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 29, 331 – 338. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/29/2/020. Gilijamse, J. J., Hoekstra, S., Meek, S. A., Metsala, M., van de Meer- akker, S. Y. T., T, S. Y., Meijer, G., Groenenboom, G. C., C., G., 2007. The radiative lifetime of metastable CO (a3Π, ν=0). J. Chem. Phys. 127, 221102–4. doi:10.1063/1.2813888. Greenberg, J. M., Li, A., 1998. From interstellar dust to comets: the extended CO source in Halley. Astron. Astrophys. 332, 374 – 384. Haberli, R. M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Geiss, J., 1996. Heating of the thermal electrons in the coma of comet P/Halley. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (A7), 15579–15589. Haider, S. A., Bhardwaj, A., 2005. Radial distribution of production rates, loss rates and densities corresponding to ion masses ≤40 amu in the inner coma of comet Halley: Composition and chemistry. Icarus 177, 196 – 216. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.02.019. Haider, S. A., Bhardwaj, A., Singhal, R. P., 1993. Role of auroral and photoelectrons on the abundances of Methane and Ammo- nia in the coma of comet Halley. Icarus 101, 234 – 243. doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1021. Huebner, W. F., Keady, J. J., Lyon, S. P., 1992. Solar photorates for planetary atmospheres and atmospheric pollutants. Astrophys. Space Sci. 195 (1), 1–294. doi:10.1007/BF00644558. Ip, W., 1985. A preliminary consideration of the electron impact ion- ization effect in cometary comas. Adv. Space Res. 5, 47–51. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(85)90066-3. Itikawa, Y., Mason, N., 2005. Cross sections for electron collisions with water molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 34 (1), 1–22. doi: 10.1063/1.1799251. Jackman, C. H., Garvey, R. H., Green, A. E. S., 1977. Electron impact on atomospheric gases, I, updated cross sections. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5081–5090. doi:10.1029/JA082i032p05081. Korosmezey, A., Cravens, T. E., Gombosi, T. I., Nagy, A. F., Mendis, D. A., SzegÅ, K., Gribov, B. E., Sagdeev, R. Z., Shapiro, V. D., Shevchenko, V. I., 1987. A new model of cometary ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res 92 (A7), 7331 – 7340. doi: 10.1029/JA092iA07p07331. Krankowsky, D., Lammerzahl, P., Herrwerth, I., Woweries, J., Eber- hardt, P., Dolder, U., Herrmann, U., Schulte, W., Berthelier, J. J., Illiano, J. M., Hodges, R. R., Hoffman, J. H., 1986. In situ gas and ion measurements at comet Halley. Nature 321, 326–329. doi: 10.1038/321326a0. Lawrence, G. M., 1972. Photodissociation of CO2 to produce doi: J. Chem. Phys. 56 (7), 3435 – 3442. CO(a3π). 10.1063/1.1677717. McConkey, J. W., Malone, C. P., Johnson, P. V., Winstead, C., McKoy, V., Kanik, I., 2008. Electron impact dissociation of oxygen- containing molecules A critical review. Phys. Rept. 466, 1–103. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.05.001. McCormick, P. T., Michelson, P. F., Pettibone, D. W., Whitten, R. C., 1976. On the energy deposition of photoelectrons in the atmosphere of Venus. J. Geophys. Res. 81, 5196 – 5200. doi: 10.1029/JA081i028p05196. Nicholls, R. W., 1962. Laboratory astrophysics. J. Quant. Spectry. Ra- diat. Transfer 2, 433 – 449. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(62)90030-4. Iga, Rao, M. V. V. S., I., Srivastava, S. K., 1995. Ionization cross-sections for the production of positive ions from H2O by electron impact. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 26421–26425. doi: 10.1029/95JE02314. Richards, P. G., Fennelly, J. A., Torr, D. G., 1994. EUVAC: A so- lar EUV flux model of aeronomic calculations. J. Geophys. Res. 99 (A5), 8981–8992. doi:10.1029/94JA00518. Rosati, R. E., Johnsen, R., Golde, M. F., 2003. Absolute yields of CO(a(cid:48)3Σ+, d3∆i, e3Σ−)+O from the dissociative recombination of CO+ 2 ions with electrons. J. Chem. Phys. 119 (22), 11630–11635. doi:10.1063/1.1623480. Rosati, R. E., Skrzypkowski, M. P., Johnsen, R., Golde, M. F., 2007. Yield of excited CO molecules from dissociative recombination of HCO+ and HOC+ ions with electrons. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 154302. doi:10.1063/1.2715943. Sawada, T., Strickland, D. J., Green, A. E. S., 1972. Electron en- ergy deposition in CO2. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 4812 – 4818. doi: 10.1029/JA077i025p04812. Schmidt, H. U., Wegmann, R., Huebner, W. F., Boice, D. C., 1988. Cometary gas and plasma flow and with detailed chemistry. Comp. Phy. Comm. 49, 17 – 59. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(88)90214-7. Seiersen, K., Al-Khalili, A., Heber, O., Jensen, M. J., Nielsen, I. B., Pedersen, H. B., Safvan, C. P., Andersen, L. H., 2003. Dissociative recombination of the cation and dication of CO2. Phys. Rev. A 68. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022708. Shunk, R. W., Nagy, A. F., 2009. Ionospheres - physics, plasma physics, and chemistry. Cambridge University Press. Singhal, R. P., Bhardwaj, A., 1991. Monte Carlo Simulation of Pho- toelectron Energization in Parallel Electric Fields: Electroglow on Uranus. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 15963 – 15972. Singhal, R. P., Haider, S. A., 1984. Analytical yield spectrum ap- proach to photoelectron fluxes in the earth's atmosphere. J. Geo- phys. Res. 89, 6847–6852. doi:10.1029/JA089iA08p06847. Skrzypkowski, M. P., Gougousi, T., Johnsen, R., Golde, M. F., 1998. Measurement of the absolute yield of CO(a3π) + O products in the dissociative recombination of CO+ 2 ions with electrons. J. Chem. Phys. 108 (20), 8400 – 8407. doi:10.1063/1.476267. Tobiska, W. K., 2004. SOLAR2000 irradiances for climate change, aeronomy and space system engineering. Adv. Space Res. 34, 1736 – 1746. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.06.032. Tozzi, G. P., Feldman, P. D., Festou, M. C., 1998. Origin and produc- tion of C(1D) atoms in cometary comae. Astron. Astrophys. 330, 753–763. Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D., A'Hearn, M. F., Arpigny, C., Brandt, J. C., Festou, M. C., Haken, M., McPhate, J. B., Stern, S. A., Tozzi, G. P., 1997. The activity and size of the nucleus of comet Hale- Bopp (C/1995 O1). Science 275, 1900–1904. Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D., McPhate, J. B., A'Hearn, M. F., Arpigny, C., Smith, T. E., 1994. Detection of CO Cameron band emission in comet P/Hartley-2 (1991 XV) with the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys J. 422, 374 – 380. doi:10.1086/173732. Wysong, I. J., 2000. Measurement of quenching rates of CO(a3Π) us- ing laser pump and probe technique. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1 - 2, 42 – 46. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00967-2. 9 ∗ † Table 1: Reactions for the production and loss of CO(a3Π). Rate(cm3 s−1 or s−1) Reaction CO2 + hν → CO(a3Π) + O(3P) Model CO + hν → CO(a3Π) 1.69× 10−9 ph → CO(a3Π) + O + e− Model CO2 + e− ph → CO(a3Π) + e− CO + e− Model + e− → CO(a3Π) + O CO+ Ka 2 HCO+ + e− → CO(a3Π) + H CO(a3Π) + hν → C + O CO(a3Π) + hν → CO+ + e− CO(a3Π) + hν → O+C+ + e− CO(a3Π) + hν → C + O+ + e− CO(a3Π) +H2O → CO + H2O CO(a3Π) + CO2 → CO + CO2 CO(a3Π) + CO → CO + CO ph → CO+ + 2e− CO(a3Π) + e− CO(a3Π) −→ CO + hν Kb 7.2× 10−5 8.58× 10−6 2.45× 10−8 2.06× 10−8 3.3 × 10−10 1.0 × 10−11 5.7 × 10−11 Model 1.26 × 102 Reference Present work Weaver et al. (1994) Present work Present work Seiersen et al. (2003), Rosati et al. (2003) Rosati et al. (2007), Schmidt et al. (1988) Huebner et al. (1992) Huebner et al. (1992) Huebner et al. (1992) Huebner et al. (1992) Wysong (2000) Skrzypkowski et al. (1998) Wysong (2000) Present work Lawrence (1972) ∗Ka = 6.5 × 10−7 (300/Te)0.8 × 0.87 × 0.29 cm3 s−1; here 0.87 is yield of dissociative recombination of CO+ 2 producing CO, and 0.29 is yield of CO(a3Π) produced from CO. †Kb = 2.4 × 10−7 (300/Te)0.7 × 0.23 cm3 s−1; here 0.23 is yield of dissociative recombination of HCO+ producing CO(a3Π), e− = photoelectron. ph 10 d e t a r g e t n i t h g i e H n m u l o c t i l s - E U I d e g a r e v a 6 4 9 0 1 6 3 8 8 6 2 6 0 1 2 8 5 9 2 1 6 5 1 1 4 8 5 1 1 9 9 4 1 2 8 5 3 1 0 3 4 8 0 3 1 3 3 9 2 3 8 3 6 9 5 5 0 9 4 2 7 4 4 0 1 5 5 5 6 4 5 5 5 +2 O C + − e 3 0 1 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 0 1 4 0 1 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 2 2 1 5 1 9 0 2 0 1 1 1 6 6 6 4 6 0 7 5 5 2 6 0 6 6 6 2 5 2 0 1 4 0 1 4 7 5 7 0 8 8 6 1 7 1 7 7 7 5 6 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 9 0 1 9 0 1 5 1 6 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 2 1 8 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 5 1 4 1 1 1 0 2 3 1 3 1 0 1 2 5 5 6 3 6 9 6 1 6 3 7 1 7 7 1 6 7 4 1 5 1 2 1 9 1 9 1 1 2 7 1 4 2 9 9 7 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 6 1 3 6 4 5 8 4 8 4 6 9 2 8 2 7 0 7 4 4 8 3 4 3 4 3 6 6 8 5 1 5 0 5 ∗ ) 0 - 1 ( 9 5 1 5 6 4 5 4 7 8 7 7 8 6 7 6 e O c C n a d n u 2 b O a C ) % ( ) % ( † t x E 7 7 . 7 4 t x E 7 7 . 7 4 C A V U E 4 4 3 . 3 4 K4 2 S 4 3 . 3 4 ) R ( s s e n t h g i r b d n a b n o r e m a C l a t o T t n e r e ff i d e e r h t t a s e s s e c o r p t n e r e ff i d r o f d n a b n o r e m a C l a t o t o t n o i t u b i r t n o c e g a t n e c r e P e v i t a l e R . 6 8 9 1 h c r a M 3 1 n o s n o i t i d n o c t n e r e ff i d r o f y e l l a H P 1 / t e m o c t a d n a b n o r e m a C e h t f o s s e n t h g i r b d e t a l u c l a C : 2 e l b a T 11 O C + ) m k ( h −p e 3 0 1 s e c n a t s i d l a i d a r d e t c e j o r p 2 O C + h −p e 3 0 1 2 O C + ν h 3 0 1 2 0 1 ) 1 - 0 ( ) 0 - 0 ( d e g a r e v a t i l s - E U I ) R ( s s e n t h g i r b ; . n o r t c e l e l a m r e h t s i − e d n a n o r t c e l e o t o h p s i h −p e ; . n o i t u b i r t s i d O C d e d n e t x E : t x E † ; . 6 8 9 1 h c r a M 3 1 n o s h g i e l a R 6 ± 7 3 s i E U I y b d e v r e s b o d n a b ) 0 - 1 ( n o r e m a C f o y t i s n e t n i e h T ∗ 1 8 1 6 1 3 1 1 9 S 2 K 1 8 1 6 1 3 1 1 9 E U V A C 1 9 8 6 M a r c h D a t e i n . 0 9 7 . 0 9 5 . 0 9 0 . 0 8 7 . 0 8 4 . 0 9 7 . 0 9 5 . 0 9 0 . 0 8 7 . 0 8 4 . 0 8 4 . 0 8 9 . 0 9 6 . 1 0 2 . 1 0 7 . 0 8 4 . 0 8 9 . 0 9 6 . 1 0 2 . 1 0 7 ( A U ) ( A U ) r ∆ . 4 9 2 . 4 9 0 . 5 9 8 . 5 8 4 . 7 5 0 . 4 9 2 . 4 9 0 . 5 9 8 . 5 8 4 . 7 5 0 2 8 . 6 3 . 4 3 . 5 1 . 6 0 . 2 8 . 6 3 . 4 3 . 5 1 . 6 0 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 4 7 . 4 3 . 6 5 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 4 7 . 4 3 . 6 5 . 0 . 6 8 0 . 7 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 0 . 9 2 0 . 6 8 0 . 7 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 0 . 9 2 s − 1 ) † ( 1 0 2 9 Q H 2 O C O 2 a b u n d a n c e s ( % C O D e r i v e d ) † / Q C O Q C O 2 3 7 6 4 6 2 6 6 [ 2 0 ± 6 ] [ 4 4 ± 9 ] [ 3 7 ± 6 ] [ 4 3 ± 8 ] 1 1 6 [ 6 4 ± 9 ] 2 4 4 2 4 0 4 3 7 5 [ 2 0 ± 6 ] [ 4 4 ± 9 ] [ 3 7 ± 6 ] [ 4 3 ± 8 ] [ 6 4 ± 9 ] ∗ ( 1 - 0 ) ( R ) 2 8 4 8 4 6 4 9 8 7 1 8 3 2 3 0 3 2 5 7 3 9 6 8 6 5 6 9 1 2 3 2 6 4 5 4 3 4 5 8 0 2 5 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 1 2 0 2 3 2 2 2 5 2 2 ( 0 - 0 ) ( 0 - 1 ) h ν + C O 2 1 6 1 8 1 9 2 1 1 9 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 4 2 2 + C O 2 C O 2 & C O a r e t a k e n f r o m F e l d m a n e t a l . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . ∗ T h e v a l u e i n s q u a r e b r a c k e t s i s I U E - o b s e r v e d ( 1 - 0 ) C a m e r o n b a n d i n t e n s i t y ; e −p h = p h o t o e l e c t r o n , e − = t h e r m a l e l e c t r o n . † T h e p r o d u c t i o n r a t e s o f H 2 O a n d a b u n d a n c e s o f R a t i o I U E - s l i t a v e r a g e d b r i g h t n e s s T a b l e 3 : C a l c u l a t e d b r i g h t n e s s o f t h e C a m e r o n b a n d a t c o m e t / 1 P H a l l e y o n d i ff e r e n t d a y s o f I U E o b s e r v a t i o n s . e −p h e −p h b a n d e m i s s i o n f o r d i ff e r e n t e x c i t a t i o n p r o c e s s e s P e r c e n t a g e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e I U E - s l i t a v e r a g e d t o t a l C a m e r o n 5 3 4 5 4 5 3 9 4 4 5 7 5 1 5 1 4 4 5 1 + C O 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 ( % ) e − + C O +2 12 2 6 2 4 5 6 4 4 6 4 7 5 8 3 7 1 7 7 3 0 7 2 9 3 3 1 0 5 5 0 b r i g h t n e s s ( R ) a v e r a g e d t o t a l I U E - s l i t Figure 1: Solar EUV fluxes from EUVAC model (Richards et al., 1994) and SOLAR2000 (S2K) model (Tobiska, 2004) for the day 13 March 1986. Significant differences in the two model solar EUV (#) The value of solar flux in SO- fluxes can be noticed. LAR2000 model for the bin 1000–1050 Å is 30 × 109 cm−2 s−1. Figure 3: Photodissociative excitation cross section of CO2 producing CO(a3Π), taken from Huebner et al. (1992). Figure 2: Cross sections for electron impact excitation of CO(a3Π) from CO and CO2. Calculated photoelectron flux at cometocentric distance of 1000 km is also shown for both SOLAR2000 (S2K) and EUVAC model solar fluxes with magnitude on right side y-axis . Figure 4: Radial profiles of various production mechanisms of CO(a3Π) in comet 1P/Halley on 13 March 1986 for relative abun- dance of 4% CO2 and 7% CO. The calculated profiles for dissociative recombination of CO+ 2 and HCO+, and resonance fluorescence of CO are shown for EUVAC solar flux only. Res. flu. = resonance fluores- cence of CO molecule. e− = Photoelectron, hν = Solar photon, and e− = thermal electron. ph 13 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100Solar photons flux (cm−2 s−1) X 109Wavelength (Å) H SOLAR2000 model (S2K)EUVAC model (EUVAC)10−210−1100101 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70105106107108Cross section (cm2) X 10−16Photoelectron flux (cm−2 s−1 eV−1 sr−1)Energy (eV)S2KEUVAC(Furlong and Newell, 1996) e + CO fi CO(a3P) e + CO fi CO(a3P) (Jackman etal., 1977) e + CO2 fi CO(a3P)(Bhardwaj and Jain, 2009) e + CO2 fi CO(a3P) (Avakyan etal., 1998)10−1910−1810−1710−16 600 700 800 900 1000 1100Cross section (cm2)Wavelength (Å) CO2 + hn fi CO(a3P)10110210310410-310-210-1100101102103104Cometocentric distance (km)Production rate (cm-3 s-1)Total (S2K)Total (EUVAC)Res. flu. COe- + CO2+e- + HCO+hν + CO2 (EUVAC)e-ph + CO2 (EUVAC) e-ph + CO2 (S2K) hν + CO2 (S2K)e-ph + CO (S2K)e-ph + CO (EUVAC)Figure 5: Radial profiles of various loss mechanisms of CO(a3Π) for 4% CO2 and 7% CO relative abundances using EUVAC solar flux. Photoelectron impact ionization of CO(a3Π) is plotted after multiply- ing by a factor 20. Figure 7: The integrated Cameron band brightness profiles as a func- tion of projected distance from nucleus for different production pro- cesses of the Cameron band, using EUVAC solar flux model and rel- ative contribution of 4% CO2 and 7% CO. The calculated brightness profiles for Cameron (1-0) band for EUVAC solar flux and total bright- ness for S2K solar flux are also shown. Figure 6: The calculated radial profiles of number density CO(a3Π) for SOLAR2000 (S2K) and EUVAC solar flux models. The density of CO(a3Π) is plotted after multiplying by a factor 106. The number density profiles of CO2 and CO are also shown for 4% and 7% relative abundances, respectively. Figure 8: The calculated (1-0) Cameron band emission brightness in the IUE projected field of view on 13 March 1986, assuming spherical symmetry, using EUVAC solar flux model, for relative contribution of 4.3% CO2 and 4.7% CO. The rectangle represent the projected field of view corresponding to IUE slit dimension of 9.07(cid:48)(cid:48) × 15.1(cid:48)(cid:48) centred on the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley, which is 11000 × 6600 km. The gray scale represent the calculated brightness with contours (solid lines) for 103, 102, 20, and 10 R marked in the figure. The calculated brightness averaged over IUE slit projected area (40 R) is shown by thick black contour between two dotted line contours which represent the upper and lower limits of IUE observed intensity value (37 ± 6 R). 14 10110210310410-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102103Cometocentric distance (km)Loss frequency (s-1)X 20Photoelectron ionizationPhotodissociation + PhotoionizationQuenching by H2OQuenching by CO2Quenching by CORadiative decay10110210310410310410510610710810910101011Cometocentric distance (km)Density (cm-3)X 106CO(a3Π)CO2CO------- EUVACS2K10-210-1100101102103104105101102103104Brightness (R)Projected distance (km)%e-ph + COhν + CO2e-ph + CO2e-th + CO2+e-th + HCO+Res. flu.Total(1-0) EmissionTotal -(S2K)-6000-4000-2000 0 2000 4000 6000Projected distance (km)-4000-3000-2000-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000Projected distance (km)100101102103(1-0) Cameron Band Brightness (R)2040433110102103
1607.06798	2	1607	2016-09-15T20:31:04	Apocenter glow in eccentric debris disks: implications for Fomalhaut and epsilon Eridani	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Debris disks often take the form of eccentric rings with azimuthal asymmetries in surface brightness. Such disks are often described as showing "pericenter glow", an enhancement of the disk brightness in regions nearest the central star. At long wavelengths, however, the disk apocenters should appear brighter than their pericenters: in the long wavelength limit, we find the apocenter/pericenter flux ratio scales as 1+e for disk eccentricity e. We produce new models of this "apocenter glow" to explore its causes and wavelength dependence and study its potential as a probe of dust grain properties. Based on our models, we argue that several far-infrared and (sub)millimeter images of the Fomalhaut and epsilon Eridani debris rings obtained with Herschel, JCMT, SHARC II, ALMA, and ATCA should be reinterpreted as suggestions or examples of apocenter glow. This reinterpretation yields new constraints on the disks' dust grain properties and size distributions.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Apocenter Glow in Eccentric Debris Disks: Implications for Fomalhaut and ǫ Eridani Margaret Pan1,2,3, Erika R. Nesvold4,5, Marc J. Kuchner3 ABSTRACT Debris disks often take the form of eccentric rings with azimuthal asymmetries in surface brightness. Such disks are often described as showing "pericenter glow", an enhancement of the disk brightness in regions nearest the central star. At long wave- lengths, however, the disk apocenters should appear brighter than their pericenters: in the long wavelength limit, we find the apocenter/pericenter flux ratio scales as 1 + e for disk eccentricity e. We produce new models of this "apocenter glow" to explore its causes and wavelength dependence and study its potential as a probe of dust grain properties. Based on our models, we argue that several far-infrared and (sub)millimeter images of the Fomalhaut and ǫ Eridani debris rings obtained with Herschel, JCMT, SHARC II, ALMA, and ATCA should be reinterpreted as suggestions or examples of apocenter glow. This reinterpretation yields new constraints on the disks' dust grain properties and size distributions. 1. Introduction More and more high-resolution images show that debris disks often take the form of rings, sometimes narrow, sometimes eccentric. Well-resolved examples include HR4796 (Schneider et al. 2009; Thalmann et al. 2011; Lagrange et al. 2012), Fomalhaut (Stapelfeldt et al. 2004; Kalas et al. 2005), HD 181327 (Schneider et al. 2006), ζ 2 Reticuli (Eiroa et al. 2010), HD 202628 (Krist et al. 2012), and HD 115600 (Currie et al. 2015). These rings may indicate the presence of hidden planets, which can clear the central cavities in the rings and also excite the ring eccentricities via secular perturbations (Roques et al. 1994; Wyatt et al. 1999; Kuchner & Holman 2003; Quillen 2006; Chiang et al. 2009; Rodigas et al. 2014; Nesvold & Kuchner 2015). At shorter wavelengths, regions of an eccentric disk near pericenter appear brighter because they receive more flux from the host star. Wyatt et al. (1999) named this phenomenon "pericen- ter glow" and developed a model for an eccentric debris ring interacting with a single planetary 1MIT Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02139 2Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H4 3NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics Laboratory, Greenbelt, MD 20771 3Department of Applied Physics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 4Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015 -- 2 -- perturber. Their model disk consists of massless particles whose eccentricities differ only in the direction of the free eccentricity. The resulting ring suffices to explain the offset in the solar zodiacal cloud from the sun and to fit observations of several debris disks, yielding constraints on the disks' forced eccentricity and the masses of the hidden planetary perturbers. However, variations in the disk surface density also affect its apparent brightness, and in a steady-state disk the density should peak at apocenter simply because typical orbit velocities are slowest there. Though modeling done by Wyatt et al. (1999) predicted a brightness enhancement at pericenter for HR 4796 at 18.2 µm, their disk model showed a 2% density enhancement at apocenter. Analogous apocentric density enhancements occur in more recent dynamical models of eccentric planets interacting with disks (see, for example, Nesvold et al. 2013; Pearce & Wyatt 2014). Indeed, submillimeter observations of the very well-observed eccentric Fomalhaut disk consis- tently suggest apocentric brightness enhancements. JCMT images of Fomalhaut by Holland et al. (2003) show slight enhancements of the flux near apocenter; these enhancements are less than the quoted uncertainty in the photometry, but they appear in both 450 µm and 850 µm bands. When Marsh et al. (2005) imaged the Fomalhaut disk at 350 µm using the SHARC II (Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera II) at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, they found that the ring has an apocentric enhancement of approximately 14% in integrated column density. More recently, Ricci et al. (2012) imaged Fomalhaut's disk at 7 mm with the ATCA and noted that the lobe of the disk near apocenter "...appears to be more extended, showing two possible asymmetric struc- tures toward east and south." The highest resolution ALMA images of Fomalhaut by Boley et al. (2012) at 350 GHz (1 mm) also show enhanced flux near apocenter in the maps corrected for the single-dish beam. Here we describe a new model for debris rings that illustrates the wavelength dependence in the apocenter/pericenter flux ratio due to the competing effects of azimuthal asymmetries in dust density and stellar illumination. Our primary interest here is mid-infrared and longer wavelengths, so we focus on dust particles and planetesimals large enough to avoid radiation pressure effects and consider only absorbed and re-radiated, rather than scattered, emission. In Section 2, we begin by describing a semi-analytic model for estimating the surface density of a steady-state distribution of collisionless planetesimals and show that the density of a dust ring varies with longitude and peaks at apocenter. In Section 3, we verify this result for a collisional ring using SMACK (Nesvold et al. 2013), a numerical model of debris disk evolution that incorporates both collisions and dynamics in 3D. Finally in Section 4, we combine a simple dust reradiation model with our models of surface density to simulate the brightness of the Fomalhaut and ǫ Eridani rings, and demonstrate that the ratio between pericenter and apocenter flux varies with wavelength. We summarize our results and discuss the implications for future observations of eccentric rings in Section 5. -- 3 -- 2. Semi-Analytic Model The surface brightness of an optically thin debris disk depends on the underlying spatial distribution of the dust as well as on the dust particles' absorption, reradiation, and scattering properties. In this section, we use basic orbit geometry and a simple Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the surface density of a eccentric ring of collisionless particles and its dependence on longitude from pericenter. 2.1. Disk Density Calculations We first estimate the linear number density, ℓ, of an eccentric ring of particles as a function of longitude, f , in the ring. ℓ(f ) is the most relevant quantity for the many images of disks that are unresolved in the radial direction. We assume that the particles form an annulus about the star, and that their eccentricity, inclination, and semimajor axis distributions are centered respectively on values e, 0, a and have widths ∆e < e ≪ 1, ∆i ≃ ∆e, ∆a ≃ a∆e. Because we are considering a ring that appears eccentric overall and has a fractional radial width no larger than ∆e, we must constrain the longitude of pericenter to a distribution centered on = 0 with width Also, we assume the particles' orbital phases and longitudes of the ascending node are distributed uniformly. ∆ ≃ p1 − e2 ∆e/e. (1) For a single particle in a stable elliptical orbit given by r = a(1 − e2) 1 + e cos f , (2) the time-averaged linear number density along the orbit is inversely proportional to the local Kep- lerian velocity: ℓsingle(f ) ∝ 1/v(f ) where v(f ) is given by v(f ) = (cid:18) GM∗ a 1 + 2e cos f + e2 1 − e2 (cid:19)1/2 ≃ v0(cid:18)1 + e cos f + e2(cid:18)1 − v0 = pGM∗/a . cos2 f 8 (cid:19)(cid:19) (3) Here v0 is simply the orbital velocity of a circular orbit with the same a. We consider only mildly eccentric disks (e ≪ 1), so to lowest order in e the linear number density in the disk scales as ℓsingle(f ) ∝ 1 v(f ) ∝ 1 − e cos f. (4) In short, because particles orbit faster at pericenter and slower at apocenter, their number density decreases at pericenter and increases at apocenter by the same fractional amount e. Marsh et al. -- 4 -- (2005) also calculated ℓ(f ) by a somewhat different method and found a similar enhancement at apocenter. In a disk of such particles, the overall linear density ℓ(f ) is the sum of all the individual densities ℓsingle(f − ). For a disk with particle orbit elements within the ranges given above, the linear density dependence on f should remain close to that of ℓsingle(f ), that is, ℓ(f ) ∝ ∼ 1 − e cos f , (5) with slight variations due to the finite widths of the distributions of orbit elements. 2.2. Monte Carlo Simulations To check our scaling argument above, we performed each Monte Carlo disk simulation by randomly drawing 5 × 104 disk particle orbits from orbit element distributions as follows. The semimajor axes, eccentricities, longitudes of pericenter, and inclinations were drawn from Gaussian distributions with center values and widths (σ) given by • typical eccentricity e and eccentricity width ∆e chosen for each disk; • typical semimajor axis a = 1 and semimajor axis width ∆a = ∆e; • typical longitude of pericenter = 0 and corresponding width ∆ given by Equation 1; • typical inclination i = 0 and inclination width ∆i = ∆e. The particles' longitudes of the ascending node and mean anomalies were chosen from uniform distributions over [0, 2π). We then measured the linear density as a function of longitude for each simulation, an example of which is shown in Figure 1. As expected, ℓ varies nearly sinusoidally with f with amplitude about equal to the eccentricity. In the above density calculations we assumed the grains are distributed uniformly along their orbits. In particular, we ignored azimuthal variations in dust production caused by differences in the frequency and severity of collisions between larger planetesimals induced, for example, by perturbations from planets orbiting in the system (see, for example, Nesvold & Kuchner 2015). These should be unimportant in our work here on gravitationally bound particles in a steady state disk, since any effects of azimuthal variations in their production rate should smear out within an orbit period1. In the next section we describe a numerical test of this effect. 1While azimuthal variations in production rate might indeed affect the steady state distribution of unbound dust small enough to be affected by radiation pressure, we leave studies on their behavior to future work -- 5 -- 3. Numerical Model with SMACK The semi-analytic model described in Section 2 assumes that the given ranges of orbit ele- ments accurately represent a steady state disk. To test these assumption and the results of the semi-analytic model, we simulated the collisional and dynamical evolution of the planetesimals using SMACK (Nesvold et al. 2013). SMACK uses an N-body integrator to track the orbits of superparticles, clouds of parent bodies with a range of sizes. When two superparticles collide, SMACK updates the superparticles' trajectories and size distributions to account statistically for collisions between their planetesimals and tracks the mass of dust (<1 mm in size) produced in the collision. We modeled the evolution of a ring of planetesimals in orbit around a solar-mass star. The planetesimals were represented by 10,000 superparticles of uniform size whose orbital elements were initially uniformly distributed with the ranges in Table 1. Each superparticle represented a size distribution of planetesimals with range and slope given in Table 1. We set the initial vertical optical depth of the ring to 10−4. While the semi-analytic model includes the eccentric ring alone, in order to induce and maintain an eccentricity in the SMACK model we added a 3 MJupiter planet to the system at semimajor axis 50 AU with eccentricity 0.1, then evolved the system for 107 yr. A snapshot of the simulation at this point shows that most of the superparticle eccentricities are distributed in a single roughly symmetric peak with half-width ∆e ≃ 0.07, while perhaps 10% form a tail extending to larger eccentricities (0.3 to 0.5). The peak eccentricity value is about 0.12, the median is about 0.14, and the mean is about 0.15. This distribution is broadly similar to our semi-analytic model assumptions except in that ∆e ≃ e rather than ∆e ≪ e. The corresponding normalized disk linear density is shown in Figure 1 and is roughly sinusoidal with a peak at apocenter and amplitude about equal to the median eccentricity. Again, this is broadly consistent with our semi-analytic and MC model predictions. As we would expect, the inclusion of collisions in the SMACK model does not strongly affect the normalized linear density. By definition the eccentric disk has some steady-state finite eccentricity e that persists regardless of the collisions; the Keplerian orbit shape required by this e sets the linear density variation with longitude. Also, because the optical depth is much less than unity, any non-uniformity in dust production spreads around the disk much faster than dust can accumulate at a given longitude. 4. Dust Reradiation Model We have used semi-analytic and SMACK modeling to simulate the density of the dust ring produced by an eccentric parent body ring and showed that the orbital geometry of the dust produces a peak in surface density at apocenter. The observed flux from the dust is therefore subject to two competing effects: this higher number density at apocenter and the higher temperature at pericenter discussed in detail by Wyatt et al. (1999). We now combine our semi-analytic and SMACK results with a simple radiative equilibrium model for dust emission to study the disk -- 6 -- Fig. 1. -- Linear number density ℓ as a function of longitude f in our simulated debris disks. SMACK model data is the thin red line; MC model data is the solid blue line; the 1 − e cos f we predict analytically is the dashed black line. The median eccentricity of the SMACK model disk is e = 0.14 and its eccentricity width is ∆e = 0.07; the same e and ∆e were used in the MC model disk shown here. Both sets of model data were normalized to their respective mean values. e = 0.14 was also used for the 1 − e cos f curve. While the MC model appears to be a very slightly better match to the SMACK model data than the cosine curve -- the root mean square deviation between the SMACK and MC models is about 2% smaller than that between the SMACK model and the cosine -- all three agree well overall. Note that no fitting was performed; the normalized model data are simply overplotted along with the cosine. -- 7 -- emission as a function of longitude at different wavelengths. We apply this surface brightness model to two well-observed disks: Fomalhaut and ǫ Eridani. 4.1. Dust Model Framework We assume a passively heated disk containing dust of sizes {s} with size distribution dN/ds ∝ s−q. We assume the disk is optically thin so that the thermal equilibrium condition for each grain is πs2 Z dλA(s, λ)L∗ 4πr2 = Z dλA(s, λ)4πs2σSBT 4(s, f ) (6) where r = a(1 − e2)/(1 + e cos f ) is the orbital radius, T is the dust's effective temperature, and the absorptivity A(s, λ) is 1 when s > λ and scales as (s/λ)β otherwise. We solve this iteratively for sizes s over a grid of wavelengths λ including the star's blackbody peak and sum over the sizes s, with weights assigned according to dN/ds, to find the flux at each of the desired wavelengths. 4.2. Fomalhaut Because it is so well-observed at wavelengths from UV to mm-wave radio, the Fomalhaut disk (eccentricity ∼0.1, Kalas et al. 2005) provides an excellent test for our models. As discussed in Section 1, previous works have consistently found that Fomalhaut exhibits pericenter glow -- i.e., is brightest at its southeast limb -- at wavelengths shorter than about 250 µm (see, for example, Kalas et al. 2005; Acke et al. 2012, and references therein). However, observations at longer submillimeter wavelengths consistently suggest that the northwest limb appears brighter than would be expected in a uniform ring (Holland et al. 2003; Marsh et al. 2005; Boley et al. 2012). We applied our dust reradiation model to the Fomalhaut system using stellar temperature T∗ = 8590 K, stellar radius R∗ = 1.28 × 1011 cm, disk semimajor axis a = 133 AU, radial width ∼20 AU, and eccentricity 0.1. To approximate the results of our semi-analytic model, we vary the linear mass density of the disk sinusoidally with longitude with amplitude 0.1 (simulating a disk with eccentricity ∼0.1). We explored a grid of absorptivity laws 1.0 ≤ β ≤ 2.0 and dust size distributions 3 ≤ q ≤ 4 to predict the apocenter/pericenter glow from visual to millimeter wavelengths. Figure 2 shows some examples of our results. Each panel shows the flux as a function of longitude, integrated over the radial width of the disk and normalized to pericenter, for 12 different wavelengths shown as different-colored curves. At the longer wavelengths, the simulated ring exhibits apocenter glow rather than pericenter glow. The location of the peak in flux shifts from apocenter (longitude = π) to pericenter (longitude = 0) with decreasing wavelength. The shortest wavelength to show apocenter glow in Figure 2 is typically 160 or 70 µm. We show a summary view of the apocenter/pericenter flux contrast in Figure 3, which displays -- 8 -- the range of apocenter/pericenter flux ratios occurring across our grid of models as a function of wavelength. Again, the modeled fluxes were integrated over the radial width of the disk, since azimuthal width variations are not well resolved in the images. Here, models exhibiting pericen- ter glow lie below the black dotted line while models with apocenter glow lie above it. At short wavelengths, all our models exhibit pericenter glow, while at long wavelengths, they all exhibit apocenter glow. This illustrates the competition between higher temperatures at pericenter dis- cussed in detail by Wyatt et al. (1999), which for Fomalhaut affect smaller particles more strongly and dominate in the shorter-wavelength emission, and the higher densities at apocenter, whose signature emerges strongly in the long-wavelength emission. Far-infrared and submillimeter obser- vations of Fomalhaut appear broadly consistent with the range of apocenter/pericenter flux ratios our models predict, though flux ratio values based on ALMA and ATCA observations longward of 350 µm are currently not precise enough to include in Fig. 3. A sufficiently large beam can dilute the effect of apocenter glow or blur it with background galaxies or other disk features like clumps, or even disk ansae, which themselves can be limb- brightened if the disk is not face-on. For example, in their discussion of pericenter glow in the Keck image of HR 4796 from Telesco et al. (2000), Wyatt et al. (1999) calculate the effects of beam size and study the disappearance of disk asymmetry as pericenter/apocenter moves away from the disk ansae. Because the beam size in the Fomalhaut images is much smaller relative to the disk size than in the Telesco et al. (2000) HR 4796 observations, we believe these dilution/confusion effects are less important for the Fomalhaut data of Acke et al. (2012) and Marsh et al. (2005)2. Indeed both sets of disk images appear ring-shaped rather than dumbbell-shaped/double-lobed as in the earlier HR 4796 images. Also, for Fomalhaut Acke et al. (2012) measure the disk major axis to coincide within 1 degree with the line of nodes in the sky plane, so it is highly unlikely that pericenter orientation masks the pericenter/apocenter flux ratio. In these relatively well-resolved images we believe we can reasonably estimate the uncertainty in the flux ratio due to beam size by convolving a one-dimensional Gaussian of width equal to the beam radius with a cosine representing the sinusoidal flux variation with longitude and quoting the difference in the pre- and post-convolution amplitudes. In order to compensate here for the apparent increase in flux at the disk ansae due to Fomalhaut's 66◦ inclination, we convolve the cosine with a one-dimensional Gaussian of width equal to the beam radius divided by cos 66◦. For the Herschel data this gives an extra flux uncertainty of ∼5% of the difference between the pericenter and apocenter fluxes at 70 microns and ∼13% of this difference at 160 microns, smaller than the size of the plot symbols. Marsh et al. (2005) incorporated beam/orientation effects in their data analysis so we infer they are included in the quoted uncertainties3. 2We refer here to the deconvolved image of Marsh et al. (2005); the deconvolution method uses knowledge of the PSF to extract extra resolution information from strongly overlapped individual fields of view. 3For the deconvolved SHARC II image our one-dimensional estimation method gives an uncertainty of ∼3%, which is comparable to that of Marsh et al. (2005). Nonetheless, in our modeling and analysis we simply adopt the result -- 9 -- Precisely where the observed flux ratios fall among our models can be a revealing diagnostic of disk properties. Figure 4.2 shows the pericenter to apocenter flux ratio at 70 and at 160 µm for our Fomalhaut models as a function of β and q. A Herschel image of the Fomalhaut disk at 70 µm shows pericenter glow with an apocenter/pericenter flux ratio of about 0.7 (Acke et al. 2012). This value corresponds approximately to the line β ≃ 1.9q − 3.2. At 160 µm, the Fomalhaut ring also shows pericenter glow (Acke et al. 2012), but the derived apocenter/pericenter flux ratio is about 0.89, corresponding approximately to the line β & 1.8q − 4.7. Observations of Fomalhaut at 7 mm by Ricci et al. (2012) provide an additional constraint: q = 3.48 ± 0.14. Combining these constraints with our findings above from the Herschel 70- and 160-µm data and our models yields the range β ≃ 1.4 to 1.7, somewhat higher than the β = 1.1 obtained by Dent et al. (2000) in their Fomalhaut model. Large values of β often point to a lack of larger, millimeter-sized grains in the grain distribution. For example, in the outer regions of T Tauri disks where grain growth has not yet occurred, β is often in the range of 1.7-2 (P´erez et al. 2012). The millimeter dust opacity slope for the ISM yields β ≈ 1.7 (Li & Draine 2001). However, the Fomalhaut system is too old for lack of grain growth to be likely. Explaining the Fomalhaut disk's strong pericenter glow may require additional physics not included in our models, for example radiation from unbound grains or planet-disk interactions more complex than those we considered (e.g. resonant dynamics). Indeed, Acke et al. (2012) find that unbound grains contribute about a quarter of the non-stellar flux in their 70 µm Fomalhaut system simulations. Finally, 350 µm observations by Marsh et al. (2005) using SHARC II at the CSO indicate somewhat stronger apocenter glow than our models predict. Either a very steep size distribution (q > 4), a very shallow absorptivity law (β < 1) or, perhaps least unlikely, a larger eccentricity e > 0.1 is required in our models to reproduce the Marsh et al. (2005) result. In fact Acke et al. (2012) measure e = 0.125 and e = 0.17 respectively from their 70 µm and 160 µm images. 4.3. ǫ Eridani Resolved images of the ǫ Eridani cold dust disk (a ≃ 61 AU Greaves et al. 2014) were recently obtained at several submillimeter/millimeter wavelengths with Herschel, SCUBA, and MAMBO (Greaves et al. 2014; Lestrade & Thilliez 2015). These images also display azimuthal asymmetry, providing an independent constraint on our models. Because ǫ Eridani (K2V, T∗ ≃ 5084 K, R∗ ≃ 5.12 × 1010 cm, Kovtyukh et al. 2003) is much cooler than Fomalhaut, none of its associated dust is subject to radiation pressure or stellar wind blowout (Reidemeister et al. 2011). Small grains may potentially provide much of the disk's surface area. Following Reidemeister et al. (2011), we included grains down to 0.1 µm in our models of ǫ Eridani . As with Fomalhaut, we produced and uncertainty reported by Marsh et al. (2005); we assume their analysis correctly accounted for any effects the deconvolution may have had on the relative flux, as necessary. -- 10 -- Fig. 2. -- Examples of results of our dust reradiation simulations of the Fomalhaut disk. Each panel shows the radially integrated disk flux as a function of longitude, normalized to pericenter, for 12 different wavelengths, shown as different-colored curves. The top row shows results for absorptivity ∝ (s/λ)1 and the bottom row corresponds to (s/λ)2. The left and right columns show results for q = 3 and q = 4 respectively. These represent the extremes of the λ -- q grid we explored in our dust reradiation simulations. Shorter wavelengths demonstrate pericenter glow, but longer wavelengths exhibit apocenter glow instead. Note the qualitative variation from apocenter to pericenter in the 160 µm flux (light blue curve) across the panels. -- 11 -- Fig. 3. -- Apocenter to pericenter flux ratios (ratio of the radially integrated disk flux at apocenter to that at pericenter) as a function of wavelength for our grid of Fomalhaut dust reradiation models. The red solid curve follows the maximum flux ratio values, which consistently occur at q = 4, β = 1; the purple dashed/dotted curves follow the flux ratios occurring at q = 3 and β = 2 (dashed) or β = 3 (dotted). The q = 3, β = 3 flux ratios are the minimum attained on our parameter grid: extending our upper bound on β from 2 to 3 makes little difference in the overall range of model flux ratios. Blue points correspond to measured flux ratios from Herschel data at 70 and 160 µm (Acke et al. 2012) and from CSO/SHARC II data at 350 µm (Marsh et al. 2005). The observed results show broad agreement with our dust reradiation model output. Uncertainties on the Acke et al. (2012) points are smaller than the plot symbols. -- 12 -- Fig. 4. -- Fractional amplitudes (referenced to the pericenter flux) of the 70 µm (top) and 160 µm (bottom) fluxes in our grid of Fomalhaut dust reradiation models. All values in our parameter range produce pericenter glow at these wavelengths. The solid contours correspond to apocen- ter/pericenter flux ratios of 0.7 (top) and 0.89 (bottom), the values extracted from Herschel obser- vations by Acke et al. (2012). The dashed contours mark nearby values of the flux ratio and give an idea of how the ratio changes as a function of the size distribution slope q and the absorptivity slope β. -- 13 -- a grid of models with 3 ≤ q ≤ 4 and 1 ≤ β ≤ 3. For ǫ Eridani we also examined a range of disk eccentricities 0.02 ≤ e ≤ 0.25, allowing the amplitude of the surface density variation with longitude to scale linearly with eccentricity, as demonstrated in our semi-analytic model. Figure 5 shows our modeling results of ǫ Eridani with e = 0.1, the disk eccentricity favored by Greaves et al. (2014), plotted together with the observed south to north flux ratios. As these fluxes were reported in a variety of formats in the discovery papers, we converted them as follows. Greaves et al. (2014) report that their 160 µm, 250 µm, and 350 µm flux ratios differ from unity by 3.0, 3.7, and 2.5 times the spread measured in a 9-pixel grid around each point. Assuming a roughly Gaussian distribution of pixel fluxes, the spread among 9 pixels would be ≃2σ where σ is the Gaussian width parameter. We produced our plotted uncertainties by assigning an uncertainty of ±σ to the north and the south fluxes and propagating errors. Although ǫ Eridani is nearly face-on, with an inclination of ∼26 degrees, we estimate using the convolution method described in section 4.2 that the large Herschel beam size relative to the disk size adds uncertainties of 27%, 42%, and 71% of the pericenter-apocenter flux difference for 250, 350, and 500 microns respectively. Lestrade & Thilliez (2015) report in their Figure 5 the 850 µm and 1200 µm fluxes as a function of azimuth. For each wavelength we took the 5 points closest to due north and due south, averaged them to get the north and south fluxes, and took the larger of the spread in the points or the uncertainties plotted by Lestrade & Thilliez (2015) as the overall uncertainty in the north/south fluxes. We then propagated errors to get the uncertainties plotted in Figure 5. These overwhelm the flux uncertainties due to beam size. Because the ǫ Eridani disk has no independent pericenter direction determination, the flux asymmetry may be interpreted as either pericenter or apocenter glow. A pericenter glow interpre- tation of the Herschel 160-, 250-, and 350-µm observations is consistent with the range of flux ratios given by our models as long as e ≥ 0.02. However, plots analogous to those in Figure 4.2 indicate that with a pericenter glow interpretation, the 160 µm data consistently favors large q (a steep size distribution) and small β (a shallower absorptivity law) while the 350 µm favors the opposite end of our parameter range, small q and larger β. By contrast, an apocenter glow interpretation of the Herschel measurement is compatible with our models only if e & 0.2. In this case all three Herschel flux ratios are consistent with a steep size distribution (large q) and a shallower absorptivity law (small β). While our models consistently predict apocenter glow only longwards of 850 µm, the precision of the flux ratios gleaned from the Lestrade & Thilliez (2015) data are such that our models appear broadly consistent with either a pericenter or an apocenter glow interpretation. 4.4. Warmer disks Figure 4 suggests that with its maximum operating wavelength of 28.3 microns, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) may not be able to add much to our understanding of pericen- ter/apocenter asymmetries in Fomalhaut: our Fomalhaut models are degenerate in this band. However, JWST could play an important role for warmer disks. As a final application for our dust -- 14 -- Fig. 5. -- Same as Figure 3, but for the outer disk of ǫ Eridani (K2V, T∗ = 5084 K, a = 61 AU Kovtyukh et al. 2003; Greaves et al. 2014). The dust reradiation models represented here use the disk eccentricity favored by Greaves et al. (2014), e = 0.1. Plotted points correspond to south to north flux ratios derived from Herschel (crosses Greaves et al. 2014) and SCUBA and MAMBO (squares Lestrade & Thilliez 2015) observations. Because the pericenter direction has not been independently determined, the measured flux ratios may be interpreted as pericenter (orange points) or apocenter (blue points) glow. Thin black error bars on the Herschel data correspond to flux uncertainties due to confusion within the beam. Note that the pericenter glow interpretation of the Herschel measurements at 350 µm is inconsistent with all of our models by about 3σ (see text for discussion of plotted uncertainties): to reproduce that scenario, we would require a size distribution significantly shallower than q = 3 and/or an absorptivity slope much steeper than β = 3. -- 15 -- reradiation model, we studied disks with semimajor axes of 10, 20, and 30 AU around a Fomalhaut- like A star. Figure 6 shows a summary of the results. Due to the higher effective temperature of the dust, we expect the transition wavelength between pericenter and apocenter glow to occur in the far-infrared rather than the submillimeter bands that are important for Fomalhaut and ǫ Eri. The longest JWST MIRI bands are well-placed to constrain β and q in such disks around A stars by measuring pericenter/apocenter asymmetries. Even barely resolved observations at 24 to 30 µm could constrain the size distribution and eccentricities of those disks. 5. Summary and Discussion Using both semi-analytic and numerical modeling of the azimuthal dust distribution in an eccentric ring of colliding planetesimals, we have studied the wavelength dependence of surface brightness variations using simple assumptions about dust radiative properties and size distribu- tions. We argued that several far-infrared and (sub)millimeter images of Fomalhaut and ǫ Eridani obtained with Herschel, JCMT, SHARC II, ALMA, and ATCA (Holland et al. 2003; Marsh et al. 2005; Ricci et al. 2012; Boley et al. 2012; Greaves et al. 2014) should be reinterpreted as sugges- tions or examples of apocenter glow. This reinterpretation also yields new constraints on the grain properties and size distributions from the existing data. Our modeling work also has implications for future observations of debris disks. The James Webb Space Telescope will be a powerful new source of debris disk images, observing at 5-28 microns with the MIRI instrument. Figure 6 illustrates that this wavelength range is particularly sensitive to pericenter glow. We predict apocenter/pericenter flux ratios as small as 0.1 in this range for dust emitting via the highly temperature-sensitive Wien law. ALMA, on the other hand, will operate at wavelengths from 3mm to 400µm, primarily con- tinuing to detect apocenter glow. ALMA images will be especially useful because, as Figures 3, 5, 6 show, the apocenter/pericenter flux ratio becomes insensitive to dust properties at millimeter wavelengths. For a fixed disk mass, changes in q and β mostly affect the flux contributed by the smallest particles: increasing q increases the number of very small particles, while increasing β decreases the flux reradiated at wavelengths larger than the particle size. However, for the longest wavelengths, λ ≫ s, the flux from small particles becomes negligible. To lowest order the millime- ter apocenter/pericenter flux ratio therefore depends only on the apocenter/pericenter temperature and density contrasts. The largest bodies radiate efficiently and have effective temperature T ∼ T∗(R∗/r)1/2 ∝ 1 ± e/2 (7) where we assume the star is a blackbody with effective temperature T∗ and radius R∗ and, in the last step, apply Eq. 2 with f = 0 (top sign) for pericenter and f = π for apocenter (bottom sign). Together with Eq. 4 evaluated at f = 0 and π, this gives apocenter/pericenter flux ratio ≃ 1 − e/2 1 + e/2 1 + e 1 − e ≃ 1 + e (8) -- 16 -- Fig. 6. -- Apocenter/pericenter flux ratios as a function of wavelength for model debris disks of sizes 10 AU (solid purple), 20 AU (dashed blue), and 30 AU (dash-dotted red) around a Fomalhaut- like A star. As before, our grid of dust reradiation models covered parameter ranges 1 ≤ β ≤ 3, 3 ≤ q ≤ 4. The top curve of each color/line style follows the maximum flux ratio values in our grid of models, while the bottom curve follows the minimum values. The wavelengths at which the greatest range of flux ratios occur are 24 to 70 µm. This suggests that observations of pericenter vs. apocenter asymmetries at the longest JWST bands are well-placed to constrain β and q in close-in disks around A stars. -- 17 -- where, as before, we take only lowest order terms in the eccentricity. The millimeter apocen- ter/pericenter flux ratio thus provides a direct estimate of the disk eccentricity. Some systems, like ǫ Eridani, no doubt contain additional structures that will complicate interpretation of their images. However, with this new understanding of apocenter glow and its wavelength dependence, we can begin future studies of debris disk images pointed in the right direction. MP was supported by NSERC funds and by an NPP fellowship at Goddard Space Flight Center administered by ORAU through a contract with NASA. MP and MJK were partially supported by NASA grant NNX15AK23G. We thank an anonymous referee for knowledgeable comments that improved our writeup. MP thanks Yoram Lithwick and Yanqin Wu for helpful conversations, and Bok Tower Gardens for their warm hospitality in the later stages of writing. REFERENCES Acke, B., Min, M., Dominik, C., Vandenbussche, B., Sibthorpe, B., Waelkens, C., Olofsson, G., Degroote, P., Smolders, K., Pantin, E., Barlow, M. J., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Brandeker, A., De Meester, W., Dent, W. R. F., Exter, K., Di Francesco, J., Fridlund, M., Gear, W. K., Glauser, A. M., Greaves, J. S., Harvey, P. M., Henning, T., Hogerheijde, M. R., Holland, W. S., Huygen, R., Ivison, R. J., Jean, C., Liseau, R., Naylor, D. A., Pilbratt, G. L., Polehampton, E. T., Regibo, S., Royer, P., Sicilia-Aguilar, A., & Swinyard, B. M. 2012, A&A, 540, A125 Boley, A. C., Payne, M. J., & Ford, E. B. 2012, ApJ, 754, 57 Chiang, E., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J., & Clampin, M. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 693, 734 Currie, T., Lisse, C. M., Kuchner, M., Madhusudhan, N., Kenyon, S. J., Thalmann, C., Carson, J., & Debes, J. 2015, ApJ, 807, L7 Dent, W. R. F., Walker, H. J., Holland, W. S., & Greaves, J. S. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 702 Eiroa, C., Fedele, D., Maldonado, J., Gonz´alez-Garc´ıa, B., Rodmann, J., Heras, A., Pilbratt, G., Augereau, J.-C., Mora, A., Montesinos, B., Ardila, D., Bryden, G., Lisea, R., Stapelfeldt, K., Launhardt, R., Solano, E., Bayo, A., Absil, O., Ar´evalo, M., Barrado, D., Beichmann, C., Danchi, W., del Burgo, C., Ertel, S., Fridlund, M., Fukagawa, M., Guti´errez, R., Grun, E., Kamp, I., Krivov, A., Lebreton, J., Lohne, T., Lorente, R., Marshall, J., Mart´ınez-Arn´aiz, R., Meeus, G., Montes, D., Morbidelli, A., Muller, S., Mutschke, H., Nakagawa, T., Olofsson, G., Ribas, I., Roberge, A., Sanz-Forcada, J., Th´ebault, P., Walker, H., White, G., & Wolf, S. 2010, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 518, L131 -- 18 -- Greaves, J. S., Sibthorpe, B., Acke, B., Pantin, E. E., Vandenbussche, B., Olofsson, G., Dominik, C., Barlow, M. J., Bendo, G. J., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., Brandeker, A., de Vries, B. L., Dent, W. R. F., Di Francesco, J., Fridlund, M., Gear, W. K., Harvey, P. M., Hogerheijde, M. R., Holland, W. S., Ivison, R. J., Liseau, R., Matthews, B. C., Pilbratt, G. L., Walker, H. J., & Waelkens, C. 2014, ApJ, 791, L11 Holland, W. S., Greaves, J. S., Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., Zuckerman, B., Webb, R. A., McCarthy, C., Coulson, I. M., Robson, E. I., & Gear, W. K. 2003, ApJ, 582, 1141 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067 Kovtyukh, V. V., Soubiran, C., Belik, S. I., & Gorlova, N. I. 2003, A&A, 411, 559 Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Bryden, G., & Plavchan, P. 2012, The Astronomical Journal, 144, 45 Kuchner, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 588, 1110 Lagrange, A.-M., Milli, J., Boccaletti, A., Lacour, S., Thebault, P., Chauvin, G., Mouillet, D., Augereau, J.-C., Bonnefoy, M., Ehrenreich, D., & Kral, Q. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 546, A38 Lestrade, J.-F., & Thilliez, E. 2015, A&A, 576, A72 Li, A., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778 Marsh, K. A., Velusamy, T., Dowell, C. D., Grogan, K., & Beichman, C. A. 2005, ApJ, 620, L47 Nesvold, E. R., & Kuchner, M. J. 2015, ApJ, 815, 61 Nesvold, E. R., Kuchner, M. J., Rein, H., & Pan, M. 2013, ApJ, 777, 144 Pearce, T. D., & Wyatt, M. C. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2541 P´erez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Chandler, C. J., Isella, A., Andrews, S. M., Ricci, L., Calvet, N., Corder, S. A., Deller, A. T., Dullemond, C. P., Greaves, J. S., Harris, R. J., Henning, T., Kwon, W., Lazio, J., Linz, H., Mundy, L. G., Sargent, A. I., Storm, S., Testi, L., & Wilner, D. J. 2012, ApJ, 760, L17 Quillen, A. C. 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372, L14 Reidemeister, M., Krivov, A. V., Stark, C. C., Augereau, J.-C., Lohne, T., & Muller, S. 2011, A&A, 527, A57 Ricci, L., Testi, L., Maddison, S. T., & Wilner, D. J. 2012, A&A, 539, L6 Rodigas, T. J., Malhotra, R., & Hinz, P. M. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 780, 65 -- 19 -- Roques, F., Scholl, H., Sicardy, B., & Smith, B. A. 1994, Icarus, 108, 37 Schneider, G., Silverstone, M. D., Hines, D. C., Augereau, J.-C., Pinte, C., M´enard, F., Krist, J., Clampin, M., Grady, C., Golimowski, D., Ardila, D., Henning, T., Wolf, S., & Rodmann, J. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 650, 414431 Schneider, G., Weinberger, A., Becklin, E., Debes, J., & Smith, B. 2009, AJ Stapelfeldt, K. R., Holmes, E. K., Chen, C., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., Hines, D. C., Werner, M. W., Beichman, C. A., Jura, M., Padgett, D. L., Stansberry, J. A., Bendo, G., Cadien, J., Marengo, M., Thompson, T., Velusamy, T., Backus, C., Blaylock, M., Egami, E., Engel- bracht, C. W., Frayer, D. T., Gordon, K. D., Keene, J., Latter, W. B., Megeath, T., Misselt, K. A., Morrison, J. E., Muzerolle, J., Noriega-Crespo, A., Van Cleve, J., & Young, E. T. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 154, 458 Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Pina, R. K., Knacke, R. F., Dermott, S. F., Wyatt, M. C., Grogan, K., Holmes, E. K., Ghez, A. M., Prato, L., Hartmann, L. W., & Jayawardhana, R. 2000, ApJ, 530, 329 Thalmann, C., Janson, M., Buenzli, E., Brandt, T. D., Wisniewski, J. P., Moro-Mart´ın, A., Usuda, T., Schneider, G., Carson, J. C., McElwain, M. W., Grady, C. A., Goto, M., Abe, L., Brand- ner, W., Dominik, C., Egner, S., Feldt, M., Fukue, T., Golota, T., Guyon, O., Hashimoto, J., Hayano, Y., Hayashi, M., Hayashi, S., Henning, T., Hodapp, K. W., Ishii, M., Iye, M., Kandori, R., Knapp, G. R., Kudo, T., Kusakabe, N., Kuzuhara, M., Matsuo, T., Miyama, S., Morino, J.-I., Nishimura, T., Pyo, T.-S., Serabyn, E., Suto, H., Suzuki, R., Takahashi, Y. H., Takami, M., Takato, N., Terada, H., Tomono, D., Turner, E. L., Watanabe, M., Yamada, T., Takami, H., & Tamura, M. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 743, L6 Wyatt, M. C., Dermott, S. F., Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Grogan, K., Holmes, E. K., & Pina, R. K. 1999, ApJ, 527, 918 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 20 -- Table 1. Initial conditions for the SMACK model. Parameter Initial Disk Values Semimajor Axis (a) Eccentricity (e) Inclination (i) Longitude of Ascending Node (Ω) Argument of pericenter (ω) Mean Anomaly Size distribution index (q) Planetesimal sizes Optical depth Number of superparticles 50-100 AU 0.0-0.2 0.0-0.1 0-2π 0-2π 0-2π −3.5 1 mm to 10 cm 10−4 104
1803.08730	2	1803	2018-04-16T14:25:24	Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	The growth process of proto-planets can be sped-up by accreting a large number of solid, pebble-sized objects that are still present in the protoplanetary disc. It is still an open question on how efficient this process works in realistic turbulent discs. Here, we investigate the accretion of pebbles in turbulent discs that are driven by the purely hydrodynamical vertical shear instability (VSI). For this purpose, we perform global three-dimensional simulations of locally isothermal, VSI turbulent discs with embedded protoplanetary cores from 5 to 100 $M_\oplus$ that are placed at 5.2 au distance from the star. In addition, we follow the evolution of a swarm of embedded pebbles of different size under the action of drag forces between gas and particles in this turbulent flow. Simultaneously, we perform a set of comparison simulations for laminar viscous discs where the particles experience stochastic kicks. For both cases, we measure the accretion rate onto the cores as a function of core mass and Stokes number ($\tau_s$) of the particles and compare it to recent MRI turbulence simulations. Overall the dynamic is very similar for the particles in the VSI turbulent disc and the laminar case with stochastic kicks. For the small mass planets (i.e. 5 and 10 $M_\oplus$), well-coupled particles with $\tau_s = 1$, which have a size of about one meter at this location, we find an accretion efficiency (rate of particles accreted over drifting inward) of about 1.6-3%. For smaller and larger particles this efficiency is higher. However, the fast inward drift for $\tau_s = 1$ particles makes them the most effective for rapid growth, leading to mass doubling times of about 20,000 yr. For masses between 10 and 30 $M_\oplus$ the core reaches the pebble isolation mass and the particles are trapped at the pressure maximum just outside of the planet, shutting off further particle accretion.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE April 17, 2018 c(cid:13)ESO 2018 8 1 0 2 r p A 6 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 0 3 7 8 0 . 3 0 8 1 : v i X r a Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence Giovanni Picogna1, 2, Moritz H. R. Stoll2, and Wilhelm Kley2 1 Universitäts-Sternwarte, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, D-81679 München, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany e-mail: {moritz.stoll@, wilhelm.kley@}uni-tuebingen.de Received April 17, 2018/ Accepted April 17, 2018 ABSTRACT The growth process of protoplanets can be sped up by accreting a large number of solid, pebble-sized objects that are still present in the protoplanetary disc. It is still an open question on how efficient this process works in realistic turbulent discs. We investigate the accretion of pebbles in turbulent discs that are driven by the purely hydrodynamical vertical shear instability (VSI). For this purpose, we performed global 3D simulations of locally isothermal, VSI turbulent discs that have embedded protoplanetary cores from 5 to 100 M⊕, which are placed at 5.2 au distance from the star. In addition, we followed the evolution of a swarm of embedded pebbles of different sizes under the action of drag forces between gas and particles in this turbulent flow. Simultaneously, we performed a set of comparison simulations for laminar viscous discs where the particles experience stochastic kicks. For both cases, we measured the accretion rate onto the cores as a function of core mass and Stokes number (τs) of the particles and compared these values to recent magneto-rotational instability (MRI) turbulence simulations. Overall the dynamic is very similar for the particles in the VSI turbulent disc and the laminar case with stochastic kicks. For small mass planets (i.e. 5 − 10 M⊕), well-coupled particles with τs = 1, which have a size of about one metre at this location, we find an accretion efficiency (rate of particles accreted over drifting inwards) of about 1.6− 3%. For smaller and larger particles this efficiency is higher. However, the fast inwards drift for τs = 1 particles makes them the most effective for rapid growth, leading to mass doubling times of about 20, 000 yr. For masses between 10 and 30 M⊕ the core reaches the pebble isolation mass and the particles are trapped at the pressure maximum just outside of the planet, shutting off further particle accretion. Key words. accretion, accretion discs - turbulence - planet-disc-interaction 1. Introduction A theory of planet formation should be able to explain the variety of planetary systems discovered within a coherent framework. In particular, the presence of gas giants poses a fundamental con- straint.Within the core accretion scenario, the interstellar dust grains need to grow from µm size to a 10− 20 M⊕ planetary core before gas accretion sets in. This growth must happen before the star can photoevaporate the gas disc, which occurs on a timescale of ∼ 3 Myr (Hillenbrand 2008). Moreover, during the growth pe- riod, planets are embedded in the ambient disc and their orbital evolutions are determined by planet-disc and planet-planet in- teractions. Some planets may end up accreted onto the star or ejected from the system if no other physical mechanisms inter- vene to stop them (see e.g. Alexander & Pascucci 2012; Ercolano & Rosotti 2015). Planet formation and evolution are determined by the structure of the protoplanetary discs in which they form. The observations of these discs can give some information about their masses, rotation, and density profile (Williams & Cieza 2011). The observed diversity in the sample of extrasolar planets indicates that the evolution of a planet may depend on variations in the initial conditions or random (external or internal) events occurring during this crucial phase. An important initial condi- tion is the stellar environment of the growing planetary system, which can strongly affect the disc lifetime by tidally truncating the outer regions of its birth disc and the dynamical evolution of the planetary system (see e.g. Picogna & Marzari 2015). We can place some constraints on the initial conditions and the giant planet formation models by studying their current phys- ical and chemical properties. The Galileo mission measured the abundances of various elements in the outer layers of Jupiter. Young (2003) found that they were in the range of 2 − 4 times solar, with a predicted core mass in the range 0−18 M⊕, strongly dependent on the assumed equation of state (Fortney & Nettel- mann 2010). The internal composition has also been derived for hot Jupiters such as HAT-P-13 b, where Buhler et al. (2016) used the analysis of secondary eclipses of the planet to infer a core mass of Mc < 25 M⊕ with a most likely value of 11 M⊕. These observations can be explained by a bottom-up model of planet formation, such as the core accretion model (Pollack et al. 1996), which predicts an enriched solid composition respect to the so- lar one. Within this framework, we are interested in studying the process that can explain how the minimum solid core mass, nec- essary to rapidly build up a massive gaseous envelope, can be accreted within the disc lifetime. The solid materials accreting onto the forming planetary core can have different origins based on the local size distribution (and Stokes number) of the solid disc. One solid reservoir con- sists of the planetesimals that are gravitationally perturbed by Article number, page 1 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE the planetary embryo. If they can cross the mean motion reso- nances with the planet and enter into its gravitational influence zone, they can end up being accreted onto it. This model of solid core accretion via planetesimals can explain a certain class of gas giants within few au from the central star, but the timescales needed to form the observed planets at tens or hundreds of au are prohibitive. One possibility to overcome this limitation is the rapid accre- tion of pebble-sized particles (Ormel & Klahr 2010; Lambrechts & Johansen 2012). In this context pebbles are centimetre-to- meter-sized objects that strongly interact with the gas via drag force. Planetary embryos with an increased gas density in their proximity have an enhanced sphere of influence to accrete solid particles, and they can interact with an higher flux of pebble- sized particles owing to their fast drift speed. Adopting this ac- cretion channel, the timescale of giant planet formation can be lowered, making the build up of gas giants at tens of au possible, if a significant reservoir of pebbles is present. In 2D hydrody- namical simulations with embedded particles, this fast accretion was confirmed (Morbidelli & Nesvorny 2012). The limiting fac- tor for this accretion process is given by the need of a contin- uous resupply of material from the outer disc because the drift timescale of this pebble-sized particles is very short. The for- mation of a strong pressure gradient created, for example, by the growing planet can filtrate particles, thereby preventing these particles from reaching the planet or inner parts of the disc; this process sets in at the so-called pebble isolation mass of the core and can explain a class of the observed transition discs. In this paper, we address these limiting factors by studying the evolu- tion of a variety of particle sizes in a global turbulent disc, de- riving their accretion rates onto the planet, and obtaining new estimates on the pebble isolation mass. We consider the evolution of particles in discs made turbu- lent by a purely hydrodynamical process, the vertical shear insta- bility (VSI) as described in Nelson et al. (2013). Recently, Stoll & Kley (2016) showed that the dust dynamics in VSI-turbulent discs, following the gas behaviour, has a drift speed directed in- wards at the disc midplane and outwards in its upper layers in a similar way as for global MHD simulations (Flock et al. 2011). This is exactly opposite to the meridional flow observed for lam- inar viscous discs. This phenomenon can have important effects on the planet formation process, resupplying materials to the outer disc regions and explaining the observed chondrule popu- lation in the outer regions of the solar system (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2002). Moreover, Stoll & Kley (2016) found that the strong vertical motions induced by the VSI were able to collect pebble- sized particles in rings of high surface density and low relative velocity, potentially aiding the planet formation process through streaming instability (Youdin & Goodman 2005; Auffinger & Laibe 2018). In this work, we extend our recent analysis of the planet-disc interaction in a laminar and turbulent disc (Stoll et al. 2017b) by adding dust particles to the simulations and study their accretion dynamics on the planet. We perform two sets of mod- els. In the first set, the dust is embedded in VSI turbulent discs (with no explicit viscosity added) and in the second series cor- responding viscous discs models are performed. This allows us to disentangle the effect of turbulence on the planet-dust interac- tion and the resulting accretion rate of solid particles. Recently, Xu et al. (2017) studied the accretion of pebbles on small cores in turbulent discs driven by the magneto-rotational instability (MRI). We compare our results to their study. In Sec. 2 we describe the various forces acting on dust par- ticles embedded in the protoplanetary disc, and then focussing in Sec. 3 on the models for planet-disc interaction and solid par- Article number, page 2 of 18 ticle accretion. In Sec. 4 we describe the adopted set-up for the numerical analysis and the main results obtained in Sec. 5. Fi- nally, we discuss the obtained solid accretion rate onto a growing planetary core in Sec. 6 and draw the main conclusions in Sec. 8. 2. Dust dynamics We consider a thin vertically isothermal gaseous disc with an embedded protoplanet of mass Mp orbiting around a Sun-like star. Additionally, we follow simultaneously the motion of dust particles of various sizes whose motions are determined by the star, planet, and turbulent gas. In the VSI turbulent disc mod- els, the particles experience the normal drag forces due gas- particle interaction; see Sect. 2.2. On the other hand, in the vis- cous disc models, the effect of the underlying turbulence is mod- elled via additional stochastic kicks on the particles as described in Sect. 2.3, in addition to the regular drag forces. 2.1. Equations of motion A dust particle immersed in the disc is subject to (i) the gravita- tional force of the central star and the protoplanet, (ii) the drag force due to the varying velocity between the dust orbiting with a Keplerian speed, and the gas, which rotates with a slightly sub- Keplerian speed (Whipple 1964), due to the radial pressure gra- dient that partially supports it against the stellar gravity, (iii) gas turbulent motion, which influences the dust dynamics by radi- ally and vertically spreading small particles; (iv) photophoretic gas pressure and radiation pressure, which we do not take into account since we focus mainly on a region close to the disc midplane where the efficiency of these processes is expected to be low, (v) growth/fragmentation (depending on their compo- sition/relative speed) due to collisions between grains (see e.g. Testi et al. 2014). We do not consider this because we study the dynamics of particles of varying sizes remaining agnostic about the dust size distribution. We define a reference frame in spherical coordinates, cen- tred at the location of the star with mass M(cid:63) = 1 M(cid:12) and co- rotating with constant angular velocity Ωf, following a proto- planet of mass Mp and fixed position rp. Then, we can describe the equation of motion of a dust particle of mass md as mdrd = Fgrav + Fdrag + Fturb + Fnonin . In this equation, the first term is the gravitational interaction with the star and planet, Fgrav = −GM(cid:63)md rd3 rp − rd3 (rp − rd) , GMpmd rd + (1) (2) the second term is the drag force (see Sec. 2.2), the third term is the turbulence force (see Sec. 2.3), and the last is the non-inertial term imparted to the star by the planet, Fnonin = −GMpmd rp3 rp . (3) We ignore the self-gravity of the disc since we model a low mass disc in which a large planetary core has already formed. 2.2. Drag force The drag force acting on a particle depends strongly on the phys- ical condition of the gas and the shape, size, and velocity of the particle. We limit ourselves to spherical particles, for which the Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence drag force always acts in the direction opposite to the relative velocity. The drag regime experienced by a dust particle is de- scribed by three non-dimensional parameters as follows: It approximates the timescale on which the embedded gas parti- cles approach the velocity of the gas. In the Epstein regime, the stopping time takes the form 1. The Knudsen number, K = λ/(2s), is the ratio of two char- acteristic length scales of the system: the mean free path of the gas molecules λ and the particle size, where s denotes the particle radius. 2. The Mach number, M = vr/cs, is the ratio of the relative velocity between dust and gas, ur, to the gas sound speed cs. 3. The Reynolds number is given by where νm is the gas molecular viscosity defined as Re = 2vrs νm , (cid:18) m0¯vth (cid:19) , σ νm = 1 3 √ (4) (5) π/8cs are the mass and mean thermal and m0 and ¯vth = velocity of the gas molecules, and σ is their collisional cross section. 2.2.1. Drag law We adopt a law that can model the drag force for a broad range of Knudsen numbers, using the approach implemented by Woitke & Helling (2003), who used a quadratic interpolation between the Epstein and Stokes regimes Fdrag = 3K + 1 Fdrag,E + 1 3K + 1 Fdrag,S . (6) For large Knudsen numbers, the first term dominates reducing the drag to the Epstein regime (Baines et al. 1965; Kwok 1975), (cid:32) 3K (cid:33)2 (cid:32) (cid:33)2 (cid:32) (cid:33)1/2 24 Re−1 24 Re−0.6 0.44 CD (cid:39) Fdrag,E = −4 3 π 1 + 9π 128 M2 ρg(rp)s2¯vtur , (7) where ρg(rp) is the gas density at the particle location. For small Knudsen numbers, the second term dominates leading to the Stokes regime Fdrag,S = −1 2 CDπs2ρg(rp)vrur , (8) where the drag coefficient CD for low Mach numbers is (Whipple 1972; Weidenschilling 1977) Re < 1 1 < Re < 800 Re > 800 . (9) For more information, see Picogna & Kley (2015, and references therein). 2.2.2. Stopping time A fundamental parameter to determine the strength of the drag force is the stopping time, ts, defined as Fdrag = − md ts (10) ur . ts = sρs ρg¯vth , (11) where ρs is the internal particle density. It is also useful to derive a dimensionless stopping time (or, hereafter, Stokes number) as τs = tsΩK(r) , where ΩK is the Keplerian orbital frequency. The Stokes num- ber τs (sometimes abbreviated by St) describes the effect of a drag force acting on a particle independent of its location within the disc. With our definition of the stopping time in eq. (11) the Stokes number is defined in the midplane of the disc. (12) 2.3. Turbulence Turbulence in the gas acts to stir up well-coupled solid parti- cles, preventing the settling process into a thin layer at the disc midplane. In general, the source of this turbulence is unknown (either driven by MHD or purely hydrodynamic processes as in our case), but it is responsible for both angular momentum and particle transport within the disc (Armitage 2010). By equating the gravitational force in the vertical direction Fgravz with the drag force Fdragz, we can derive a characteristic settling speed vset = tsΩ2 (13) The condition for which the turbulence strength can counteract the vertical settling of small dust particles is then obtained by comparing the settling time Kz . tset = z vset = 1 tsΩ2 K , (14) to the time tdiff the turbulence needs to erase the spatial gradients in the particle concentration tdiff = z2 Dd , (15) where Dd is the turbulent diffusion coefficient of the particles (dust). If one assumes that Dd equals, to a first approximation, the diffusion coefficient for the gas Dg and that we can write Dg (cid:39) αcsh, assuming that the turbulence acts like an effective viscosity (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973), then one can derive the minimum α value required to prevent dust settling at one scale height, z = h α >∼ τs . In the following we use a more complex turbulent diffusion model that distinguishes between Dd and Dg. (16) 2.3.1. Turbulent diffusion model The source of turbulence in planet-forming discs is unknown. It can depend strongly on the environment, and different sources might be dominant in the various regions and during the evolu- tion of the disc. In the laminar disc simulation, we do not con- sider the origin of the turbulence and use a simplified turbulence diffusion model to evolve the dust population. The basic idea is to mimic turbulent transport as a diffusive process (through a Brownian motion) (Dubrulle et al. 1995; Charnoz et al. 2011; Article number, page 3 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE Youdin & Lithwick 2007) with a stochastic term in the equation of dust motion to account for the kicks induced by the turbulent gas velocity field. We model the kick on the particle position as a random Gaussian variable δrd,T with mean (cid:104)δrd,T(cid:105) and variance σ2 d,r depending on the dust diffusion coefficient Dd as follows:  (cid:104)δrd,T(cid:105) = Dd ρg σ2 d,r = 2Dddt , δrd,T = ∂ρg ∂x dt (17) where dt is the time step and ∂/∂x is the spatial derivative along the considered direction. The relation between particle and gas diffusion can be written as Dd = Dg Sc , where Sc is the Schmidt number (Youdin & Lithwick 2007) Sc = 1 + Ω2 Kτ2 s 1 + 4ΩKτs . (18) (19) This prescription for the turbulent diffusion assumes that the dif- fusion coefficients in the vertical and radial direction are identi- cal. This is a crude assumption as we have shown in Stoll et al. (2017a) because the α parameter can differ in the radial and ver- tical direction by more than two orders of magnitude; see also the discussion in Youdin & Lithwick (2007). Nevertheless, we use this simplified description to model the vertical and radial spread of dust particles in the viscous disc simulations and find results comparable to those created self-consistently by VSI tur- bulence as we show later. 3. Planet-solid disc interaction 3.1. Particle accretion The idea that gas plays a pivotal role in the accretion of solids by planetary cores was first introduced in the Kyoto model (Hayashi et al. 1977; Nakazawa & Nakagawa 1981; Nakagawa et al. 1983). The basic concept was that the orbital decay experienced by planetesimals is size dependent, occurring at a lower rate for larger bodies. In this way, a large embryo can grow as drag feeds it with dust and small planetesimals. Later, Weidenschilling & Davis (1985) found that orbital resonances with the growing core can effectively filter a significant fraction of planetesimals for which the drag force is not strong enough to allow them to cross those stable regions. However, since eccentricities are pumped up at resonances, collisions between large planetesimals become more frequent, increasing the fraction of smaller bodies that can cross the resonances and accrete onto the planetary core. On the other hand, Kary et al. (1993) showed that even if a body is small enough to cross all the resonances, it can avoid being accreted. The impact probability typically ranges between 10 − 40% but can be higher if the core possesses an extended at- mosphere (D'Angelo et al. 2014). More generally, the accretion rate is inversely proportional to the strength of the drag force and the inclination of the planetesimal. Moreover, Kary et al. (1993) found that for cores with mass ratio q = Mp/M(cid:63) > 10−5, the ma- terial approaching the planet can be captured into a stable orbit around the planet, thereby forming an accretion disc around it. This strong perturbation in the local environment of the protoplanet creates pressure gradients that impact the evolu- tion of dust and planetesimals (Paardekooper & Mellema 2004; Paardekooper 2007). In particular, small protoplanets, depend- ing on their surface and temperature profiles, can carve a gap in the dust disc even if there is no gas gap (Picogna & Kley 2015; Rosotti et al. 2016; Dipierro et al. 2016). Article number, page 4 of 18 , l = (20) (l + m) 3.2. Resonances A particle that migrates within the disc feels a stronger (regu- lar) gravitational interaction with a planetary companion when it reaches specific locations in the disc where its mean motion nd = 2π/T, where T is its orbital period, is a multiple of the planet mean motion nP nd nP where l and m are integer numbers. These are called mean mo- tion orbital resonances (MMR), where m gives the order of the resonance. These MMRs can effectively excite the eccentricity and inclination of particles, potentially halting their drift process. Their strength grows for decreasing values of m and increasing l. Thus, focussing on first order MMR (m = 1), the larger l, the smaller the particles that can be stopped from accreting onto the planet. The resonances are yet not able to halt all the particles be- cause they become more and more closely spaced as l grows un- til the point at which they overlap leading to a chaotic behaviour of the dust particles that can cross the higher order resonances (Wisdom 1980). The minimum size smin of a particle for which the resonant perturbations due to a planet with mass ratio q are stronger than the drag force is (Weidenschilling & Davis 1985) smin = ρghad 3ρdqC(l)l3/2 , (21) (22) where C(l) is an increasing function of l, ad is the particle semi- major axis, and the region of chaotic behaviour close to the planet location starts at (Duncan et al. 1989) r − ad (cid:39) 1.5q2/7 . This relation depends strongly on the local gas properties. When the planet opens up a gap in the gaseous disc, reducing the gas surface density, the particle Stokes number increases; thus the inner resonances can halt a larger fraction of incoming particles, which are less coupled to the gas. For a planet with q = 10−4 Paardekooper & Mellema (2004) found three visible regimes. Particles with Stokes number less than τs (cid:39) 0.1 are well coupled to the gas, and they always reach the planet surface. On the other hand, particles with τs > 10 are trapped in external resonances, and their accretion rate is very low. Finally, the intermediate regime is reaching the co-orbital region of the planet, but not all of them are accreting as predicted by Kary et al. (1993). 4. Set-up We used the pluto code (Mignone et al. 2007) and modified it to take into account the evolution of partially coupled particles. The main parameters of the reference simulations are summarised in Tab. 1. The simulations analysed in this work are the same as in Stoll et al. (2017b), where we analysed the dynamics of a planet embedded in a VSI turbulent disc without particles, so we briefly describe the set-up, focussing only on the dust part. For a more detailed description of the initial conditions of the gaseous disc, see Stoll et al. (2017b). 4.1. Gas component The initial disc profile is axisymmetric and extends from 2.08 au to 13 au (0.4 to 2.5 in code units, where the unit of length is Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence 5.2 au). The gas moves with azimuthal velocity given by the Keplerian speed around a 1 M(cid:12) star, corrected for the pressure term and rotational velocity of the coordinate system that rotates here with the orbital speed of the planet. The total disc mass is 0.01 M(cid:12) and the density distribution, created by force equilib- rium, is given in cylindrical coordinates (R, Z, φ) by (cid:32) R (cid:33)p (cid:34)GMs (cid:32)1 r − 1 R (cid:33)(cid:35) , c2 s Rp exp ρg(R, Z) = ρg,0 (23) where ρg,0 is the gas midplane density at R = 1 and p = −1.5 is the density exponent. In our case ρg,0 = 2.07 · 10−11 g/cm3 such that the vertically integrated surface density at R = 1 is Σg = 200 g/cm2. The disc is modelled with a locally isother- mal equation of state, and we assume a constant aspect ratio H/R = 0.05, which corresponds to a radial temperature profile with an exponent q = −1 and T(Rp) = 121 K. For the inner and outer radial boundary, we apply reflective conditions, while outflow conditions are implemented for the vertical boundaries and periodic conditions in the azimuthal direction. We perform two sets of simulations. One set has an inviscid disc in which the source of turbulence is given entirely by the VSI and the other uses a viscous disc in which the viscosity is given by ν = 2/3αcsH, where we use a constant α viscosity as derived from the VSI simulation, which is α = 5 · 10−4 (Stoll et al. 2017b). 4.2. Dust component The solid fraction of the disc is modelled with 106 Lagrangian particles divided into ten size bins as reported in Table 1.This approach has the great advantage of modelling a broad range of Stokes numbers (see eq. 12) self-consistently using the same model particles. The trade-off is that in the regions of low den- sity, the resolution of the dust population is lower. However, for our study this is not a problem since we are mainly interested in the dynamical evolution of dust particles; thus we do not take into account collisions between particles or the backreaction of the dust onto the gas. We study particles with sizes from 0.1 mm up to 1 km and internal density ρd = 1 gcm−3. The particle sizes and corresponding Stokes numbers are quoted in Table 1, where the Stokes numbers are evaluated at the planet location. The par- ticle sizes are chosen to cover a wide range of different dynami- cal behaviour. The initial surface density profile of the dust par- ticles is Σd(r) ∝ R−1 . This choice was made to have a larger reservoir of particles in the outer disc. This particle distribution leads to equal number particles in each radial ring as the grid is spaced logarithmically in the radial direction. The dust particles are placed initially at the disc midplane in the disc model with active VSI driven tur- bulence because the particle stirring is obtained via the turbulent mechanism. For the laminar disc, we start with a vertical dis- tribution given by the local disc scale height and the dust dif- fusion coefficient. By comparing eq. (14) and eq. (15) we find that, for our initial profiles, particles larger than 1 mm are go- ing to settle to the disc midplane. The particles are introduced at the beginning of the simulation, and they are evolved with two different integrators depending on their Stokes numbers. Follow- ing the approach by Zhu et al. (2014), we adopt a semi-implicit leapfrog-like (drift-kick-drift) integrator in spherical coordinates for larger particles and a fully implicit integrator for particles well coupled to the gas. We include in Appendix B the detailed (24) Table 1. Model parameter Parameter Radial range [5.2 au] Vertical range [H, θ] Phi range [rad] Radial grid size Theta grid size Phi grid size Planet masses [M⊕] Particle sizes [cm] (105 in each bin) Corresponding Stokes number for the 10 bins model 0.4 - 2.5 ±5, 76◦ − 104◦ 0 - 2 π 600 128 1024 5, 10, 30, 100 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 30, 100, 300, 103, 104, 105 7.79 · 10−5, 7.79 · 10−4, 0.0078 0.082, 0.27, 1.23, 6.91, 67.2 377, 7670 implementation of the two integrators. We do not consider the effect of the disc self-gravity on the particle evolution. Particles that leave the computational domain at the inner boundary are re-entered at the outer boundary. Accreted particles are flagged but are otherwise kept in the simulations. 4.3. Planets We embed a planet, with a mass in the range [5, 10, 30, 100 ]M⊕, orbiting a solar mass star on a circular orbit with semi-major axes ap = 1 in code units (5.2 au). The planet does not migrate and its mass is kept fixed. To prevent a singularity close to the planet location, its gravitational potential is smoothed with a cu- bic expansion inside a sphere centred on the planet location with a radius given by the smoothing length drsm = 0.5RH (Klahr & Kley (2006), Stoll et al. (2017b)), where RH denotes the radius of the Hill sphere (cid:33)1/3 (cid:32)1 3 RH = Rp q . (25) After the dust component has been evolved for 20 orbits in the computational domain, the planetary mass is slowly increased over additional 20 orbits to allow for a smooth initial phase. Each simulation was run over 200 orbital periods of the planet when the disc structure had reached a quasi-stationary state. 5. Global dust motion In this section, we analyse the overall behaviour of the dust par- ticles in the presence of the planet in combination with the disc turbulence. Of particular interest are the changes in the spatial distribution of the particles as induced by the planet. However, before we focus on the action of the planet we comment briefly on the dust dynamics in the disc. 5.1. Vertical dust distribution The action of the turbulence in the disc works against the ten- dency of the dust particles to settle towards the midplane of the disc and leads to a vertical spreading of the particles. Concern- ing this particle stirring in turbulent discs we present in Fig. 1 the vertical scale height of the particles (in units of the gas scale height H) as a function of their Stokes number, τs for various models. The two cases studied in this work are shown by the blue and green crosses for the VSI turbulent case and the lami- nar disc with stochastic particle kicks, respectively. We analysed Article number, page 5 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE for the mean vertical Mach number Mz ≈ 0.1. In (Stoll & Kley 2016) we quote for the (dimensionless) eddy turnover timescale τe ≈ 0.2. From these we can calculate a vertical diffusion coeffi- cient of (Youdin & Lithwick 2007) αz = τe M2 (27) z . Hence, from Stoll & Kley (2016) we find τe ≈ 0.2, which is consistent with the value obtained by the fit for Fig. 1. Fig. 1. Measured particle scale height, Hp, in units of the gas scale height, H, as a function of the particle Stokes number for the simu- lations of the turbulent VSI, and the laminar disc plus stochasistic kicks at R = 1.8rp, averaged between 150 and 200 orbital periods. Shown are the results of the runs used in this paper (labelled with blue and green crosses), and of Stoll & Kley (2016) and Fromang & Nelson (2009) in- dicated with light blue and black circles, respectively. Additionally, we overplot the fit of the VSI particle scale heights by Youdin & Lithwick (2007) (see equation 26). the particle distribution for the 5M⊕ case at a radius of 1.8rp averaged between 150 and 200 orbital periods. From our previ- ous work in Stoll & Kley (2016) we know that the timescale for spreading the particles vertically in the presence of fully devel- oped VSI turbulence is about 100 orbital periods, so near the end of our simulations (150− 200 orbits) the particle distribution has reached a quasi-stationary state. Furthermore, we checked the particle vertical distribution from 100 and 150 orbital periods at the same distance and found the same profile, confirming that an equilibrium was reached. Additionally, we show the results of Stoll & Kley (2016) for locally isothermal discs using the data taken from their Table 1 (labelled SK16) and Fromang & Nelson (2009) who studied particle settling in global ideal MHD disc displaying MRI turbulence (labelled FN09). Overplotted to the data is an approximation by Youdin & Lithwick (2007, their equation (28)), which can be written as (neglecting a correction factor of order unity) , (26) as can be inferred from eq. (26). where αz measures the vertical diffusion of the gas; see Youdin & Lithwick (2007). In Fig. 1 we use αz = 1.737· 10−3 for the fit. Equation (26) accounts for the fact that for small τs the particles are well coupled to the gas and the two scale heights agree, Hp = H, while larger particle settle more to the midplane of the disc and have a smaller thickness. For large τs the slope becomes ∝ τ−0.5 s For the small particle sizes our distribution is similar to that of Fromang & Nelson (2009). For their investigated particle sizes with τs = (10−4, 10−3, 10−2), they find a scaling Hp/H ∝ τ−0.2 in rough agreement with our findings. For the larger particles the slope becomes steeper than the expected ∝ τ−0.5 scaling because we have reached the resolution limit in our simulations such that the particle scale height cannot be resolved anymore. In our previous simulations of particles embedded in VSI turbulent discs (Stoll & Kley 2016) we find for the mean vertical velocity at 5 au < v2 K,1au (normalising to the Kep- lerian velocity at 1 au). Using this value and H/r = 0.05 we find z >= 5 · 10−6v2 s s Article number, page 6 of 18 (cid:114) αz αz + τs Hp H = (cid:18) H (cid:19)2 5.2. Dust filtration In Fig. 2 we plot the radial distribution of three representative size particles as a function of time. Shown are the results for both the viscous α- and turbulent VSI-disc models for all planet masses from 5 M⊕ (top) to 100 M⊕ (bottom). The particle sizes increase from left to right from 10.0 cm to 10 m, which corre- sponds to the Stokes numbers 8 · 10−2, 1.23 and 67, respectively. Clearly visible are the different radial drift velocities of the par- ticles that are a function of the Stokes number, τs. Indeed, the speeds found in our simulations are in good agreement with the theoretical expectation of Nakagawa et al. (1986), which is given by vdrift = ∂ ln p ∂ ln R R uK τs + τ−1 s ≡ −2 η vK τs + τ−1 s . (28) Equation (28) indicates that the maximum speed, reached for τs = 1, is given by vdrift = −ηvK, where η is typically of order (H/R)2 and vK is the Keplerian azimuthal velocity. The results on the drift speed for the VSI turbulent and viscous disc are very similar for all cases studied. For the low mass 5 M⊕ planet and small particles one notices small disturbances near the planet (first two rows on the left), but the planets are not able to stop the particles from crossing their location. The same behaviour is also found in the 10 M⊕ case displayed in the second two rows of Fig. 2. Focussing on the middle column, we can see the evolution of 1 m particles, which have a Stokes number of order unity (τs = 1.23). Their drift speed is so high that they can cross the whole computa- tional domain in ∼ 150 orbits, in agreement with Eq. (28); see also Stoll et al. (2017b). A change in the drift speed is also visi- ble as the particles cross the planet co-orbital region because the Stokes number suddenly increases because of the drop in the gas density. The only exception is given by the planetesimal-sized objects (10 m, τs = 67, right column), which do not feel a strong gas drag, such that the planetary core can effectively perturb their orbits depleting its co-orbital region. This regime is described in Dipierro & Laibe (2017), who found that for a Stokes number number greater than a critical value τs,crit (cid:39) 2.76 (cid:18) −ζ (29) where = 0.01 is the dust-to-gas ratio, and ζ = ∂ln p/∂ln R = −2.5, the minimum mass to open a gap in the solid disc is Mcrit (cid:39) 1.38 (cid:18) −ζ (cid:19)3 M(cid:12) . (30) −3/2 τ s 1 + R For our parameter space, we find that this transition happens be- tween the particles with s = 300 cm (τs = 6.91) and a critical mass of 12 M⊕ and the particles with s = 1000 cm (τs = 67.2) and a critical mass of 0.4 M⊕. We see that only the second sam- ple of particles is depleted from the co-orbital region of the small mass planets, confirming their analytical prescription. 1 + (cid:19) (cid:39) 6.83 , (cid:18) H (cid:19)3/2 Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of the dust particles as a function of time for the different planetary masses and for three representative particle sizes. The Stokes numbers from left to right are 0.08, 1.23, and 67.2. Article number, page 7 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE Fig. 3. Histogram of the dust surface number density distribution as a function of radius after 200 planetary orbits for three representative dust sizes in the turbulent (blue) and laminar (green) case. The Stokes numbers from left to right are 0.08, 1.23, and 67.2. Fig. 4. Azimuthal gas speed in units of the Keplerian speed as a function of radius for the different planetary masses and models (VSI = red, alpha-disc = green). When the gas speed becomes super-Keplerian outside the planet location, the dust-filtration process occurs and the pebble isolation mass is reached. Article number, page 8 of 18 Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence Fig. 5. Surface density distribution of the dust particles after 80 planetary orbits for the different planetary masses and for three representative particle sizes. The Stokes numbers from left to right are 7.79 · 10−5, 1.23, and 67.2. Article number, page 9 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE The third two rows of Fig. 2 show the particle evolution for a 30 M⊕ planet. This planetary mass can change the final particle distribution dramatically. A gap is already visible for the 10 cm particles, while for the particles with Stokes number of order unity (central column) the planet acts as a barrier and can fil- trate the dust in the outer disc. This effect is due to the formation of a pressure maximum beyond the planet where small particles are trapped (Paardekooper & Mellema 2006). After ∼ 100 orbits the particles are located either in the pressure bump close to the planet position or in the outer disc. This dust filtration leads to a strong reduction of particles inside the planetary orbit, and hence the number of particles leaving through the inner radius is strongly diminished. As those particles are re-entered at the outer boundary, eventually this results in a shut-off of the flow of par- ticles in the outer disc. We decided not to have a constant inflow of particles because they would only end at the pressure bump as all the others. The particle concentration could become a sweet spot to have a second generation of planets due to streaming in- stability, but it is beyond the purpose of this paper to study this high dust density regions in more detail. For the planetesimal-sized objects, the 30 M⊕ planet can open a deeper and wider gap compared to the small mass cases. Only planets greater than 10 M⊕ are able to filter the pebble- sized particles efficiently. This result confirms the value obtained by Lambrechts et al. (2014) in which they defined the pebble isolation mass around 20 M⊕ for similar initial disc condition. As we have seen, a planet that modifies the pressure profile in the disc can effectively stop the inward drift of certain size of dust particles. In a related scenario, such a dust filtration is be- lieved to explain the observation of a class of transition discs (Type 2), where the dust is highly depleted in the inner region of the protoplanetary disc while the gas accretion rate onto the star remains high (for a recent review on the subject see Ercolano & Pascucci 2017). The last two rows show the particle evolution for the 100 M⊕ planet where the dynamical behaviour of the dust particles is very similar to the 30 M⊕ case but the gap opens ear- lier, and so the simulations reach a stationary state on a shorter timescale. 5.3. Gap opening A planet can open a gap in the dust disc even if no clear gap ap- pears in the gas distribution (see e.g. Picogna & Kley 2015). We analysed the radial distribution of the dust population by split- ting the computational domain into 400 logarithmically spaced bins and following its evolution with time. In Fig. 3 we plott the distribution at the end of the simulation (200 planetary orbits) for the same three representative size particles as in the previous plot. In the left column, the 10 cm dust particles (corresponding to a Stokes number of τs = 0.08) do not show a strong pertur- bation by the presence of the small mass planets (in the first two rows, corresponding to 5 and 10 M⊕). A clear gap appears start- ing with the 30 M⊕ planet (third row), where the influence of the VSI (represented by a blue line) favours the formation of deeper gaps. The intermediate case of meter-sized particles, which corre- sponds to a Stokes number of τs = 1.2, represents the fastest evolving particles in the simulation; see eq. (28). As shown in the central column, the distribution is strongly affected by the vertical motion of the VSI where a bunching behaviour can be noticed (Stoll & Kley 2016). This feature cannot be reproduced by the viscous α-disc model. In the 30 M⊕ planet case (third col- umn) we see that the VSI also leads to a faster dust filtration pro- cess, which is already completed for the 100 M⊕ case in which Article number, page 10 of 18 the inner disc is practically devoid of particles. For the massive planets one notices that a large number of small and large parti- cles remain at the co-rotation location. These are particles collect near the two Lagrange points L4 and L5. For a planetesimal-sized object of 10 m in the third row (cor- responding to a Stokes number of τs = 67) the gas influence is negligible. A gap is visible in the distribution already for the small mass planets due to their gravitational interaction with the particles. In this case, the VSI does not affect the evolution of planetesimals and yields results identical to the viscous case. The effect of filtering and gap formation can be understood in terms of the angular velocity distribution in the disc around the planet. The onset of gap formation leads to a super-Keplerian flow just outside of the planet, which coincides with a maximum in the radial pressure distribution. The angular velocity is shown in Fig. 4, where the ratio of vφ/vkep is shown for the four differ- ent planetary masses. Outside of the planet the ratio is slightly smaller than one owing to the pressure support of the gas. For the planet masses displayed the super-Keplerian motion begins to show for the 30 M⊕ case. Hence, as expected the filtering pro- cess is directly related directly to the maximum in the angular velocity. The property that particles (with unit Stokes number) cannot be accreted above a critical planet mass is referred to as the pebble isolation mass. In appendix A we present additional simulations to confirm that our simulations have been run long enough to draw this conclusion about the super-Keplerian mo- tion. 5.4. Planet-solid disc interaction The planet is not only able to open a gap in the dust and gas disc, but it can also generate non-axisymmetric features in their distribution that might be observable with modern observational facilities. In Fig. 5 we show the surface density distribution of the dust population after 80 planetary orbits. The spiral arms that are typically generated by embedded planets are only (barely) visi- ble for the most massive planet (bottom row) and the smallest particles (left column) that are well coupled to the gas dynam- ics. For the 100 M⊕ planet strong vortices are created in the gas disc for the VSI case and less so for the laminar case (Stoll et al. 2017b). Because they are pressure maxima, particles tend to ac- cumulate in these vortices, which is reflected in the correspond- ing particle distributions as seen in the bottom left part of the plot. Also visible in the middle column is the strong effect that the VSI has on pebble-sized particles creating regions where parti- cles are collected as shown in Stoll & Kley (2016). For the large planets we see, as shown in more detail before, in the bottom part of the middle column, that a sort of transition disc is formed since the planet has reached the pebble isolation mass, stopping the influx of meter-sized particles (as seen also in Ayliffe et al. 2012). On the other hand, for the planetesimal-sized objects, shown in the right panel, we observe ripples close to the planet location due to the excitation of the eccentricity in the dust parti- cles by the planet that the gas is not able to effectively damp on a short timescale. Furthermore, the planetesimals are collecting in the Lagrangian points (L4 and L5) in front and behind the planet location, and their density is enhanced at the outer 2:1 mean mo- tion resonance with the planet, visible in the upper part of the last column for the 100 M⊕ planet. The eccentricity distribution indicated in Fig. 6 shows only small differences between the α- and VSI-disc models, while they are much more pronounced for the inclination distribution shown in Fig. 7. The excitations at the resonance locations are Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence Fig. 6. Eccentricity distribution for 3 representative size particles in the VSI (blue) and alpha-disc (green) model at the end of the simulation. The first six inner and outer first-order MMRs are overlaid. Fig. 7. Inclination distribution for 3 representative size particles in the VSI (blue) and alpha-disc (green) model at the end of the simulation. The first six inner and outer first-order MMRs are overlaid. Article number, page 11 of 18 Table 2. Comparison of the mean eccentricity and inclinations of the solids in the disc for the different planet masses at the end of the simulation. A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE Planet masses 5M⊕ 10M⊕ 30M⊕ 100M⊕ Eccentricity Inclination VSI [10−3] Laminar [10−3] VSI [10−1 deg] Laminar [10−1 deg] 6.920 6.936 6.702 7.089 4.673 5.054 5.062 8.843 4.480 4.786 5.250 9.406 7.439 7.310 6.071 4.854 visible for the biggest size objects in the lower panel. From eq. (22) we find that the region where the chaotic behaviour pre- vents the resonances from stopping planetesimal objects starts at a radial distance of 0.1478 from the planet location for the 100 M⊕ planet and 0.1048 for 30 M⊕. These values roughly cor- respond to the 5:4 and 7:6 MMRs with the planet. From Fig. 6, where the location of the major MMRs are plotted, we can con- firm this finding. Planetesimal objects cannot reach the region inside the 5:4 resonance with the 100 M⊕ planet, while for the 30 M⊕ planet the bodies are able to reach the 7:6 resonance where the chance of being accreted by the planetary core is much higher. In Tab. 2 we also report the mean values of all the solids in the disc at the end of the simulation. The eccentricity and in- clinations are on average higher for the VSI discs with respect to the laminar discs in the small mass planets. This effect can be explained by the highly anisotropic turbulence nature of the VSI, which is able to stir up dust particles exciting their orbital elements more efficiently. This trend however is inverted for the high mass planets, possibly because the VSI strength is partly reduced by the presence of massive planets, and the production of vortices in which the particles tend to be collected. The viscous α-disc model cannot correctly reproduce the dis- tributions observed in the VSI disc because we assumed a con- stant α-value throughout the whole computational domain, and did not distinguish between radial and vertical angular momen- tum transport. However, as shown recently the VSI turbulence behaves strongly anisotropic with a large difference between ra- dial and vertical transport (Stoll et al. 2017a). Since the turbulent kicks in the particle motion are generated based on the constant alpha value, they over- or under-predict the turbulence efficiency in the laminar disc resulting in a different particle scale height, and thus inclination. Nevertheless, this does not seem to play a crucial role in the solid accretion rate to the planet from small turbulent velocities. Fig. 8. Number of accreted particles per orbit over time for the four different planet masses. Shown is the total number summed over all size bins. Article number, page 12 of 18 6. Solid accretion rate In order to detect the particles that accrete onto the planet, we adopted two different approaches, depending on the ratio of their Stokes number and the time they spend inside the Hill sphere which, for pebble-sized particles with τs is tenc = RH/∆v, where ∆v is the relative velocity between the particle and the planet. For particles with stopping time shorter than tenc, their trajectory close to the planet location is determined primarily by the drag force. Whether the particle is then accreted depends on the rel- ative strength of the gravitational attraction and the drag force. If the drag force dominates, it can sweep out a particle even if it is gravitationally bound. Thus we checked if the timescale for gravitational attraction tg = ∆v/g is shorter than four times the timescale for the stopping time. The factor of four stems from the results of Ormel & Klahr (2010), who had found in their nu- merical simulations that only a small deflection of a fourth of the velocity is needed to accrete the particle. Larger particles lose only a small amount of momentum through drag when they cross the Hill sphere. Thus we checked for whether particles inside the Hill sphere are bound by the gravity of the planet, which is the case if the particle has not enough kinetic energy to leave the Hill sphere, that is ekin + egrav < egrav(RH) . (31) Both approaches also agree in the transition region where the stopping time is similar to tenc. We checked for these conditions every tenth of a planetary orbit and we flagged as accreted the particles that fulfil the previous criteria without removing these particles from the computational domain. In Fig. 8 we show the number of accreted particles per orbit for the different planet masses as a function of time. In the ini- tial phase of the simulations, the number of accreted particles in- creases while the mass of the inserted planets grows to their final value (within 20 orbits). After that, the number of accreted par- ticles drops continuously and settles roughly to a constant value for the lower mass planets, as there is at least for the faster drift- ing particles a continuous supply from the outer disc (see Fig. 2 middle column). For the larger mass planets, the accretion rates are further reduced as they have reached their isolation mass for the particles with Stokes number around unity. Additionally, for the large planets, the small and large particles drift very slowly and, after the particles within the horseshoe region have been accreted, the new inflow from the outer disc is very slow. In Fig. 9 we show the number of accreted particles of vari- ous sizes for different planet masses summed over 50 planetary orbits, from t = 100 − 150. Several interesting features can be noted. The number of accreted particles peaks for particles in the range between 30 and 300 cm (corresponding to pebble-sized objects with Stokes number of order unity) for the small plan- etary masses, while these particles are effectively accreted and filtered for the two higher mass planets. The total number of ac- creted particles adds up to about 5000 for each of the lower mass planets in agreement with the results shown in Fig. 8. Moreover, Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence although the effect of VSI seems marginal it shows in nearly all cases a slightly higher solid accretion rate than for the viscous α-disc model. As the difference is rather small we may conclude that our modelling of the stochastic motion of particles in discs also gives reasonable results for the accretion rates of the parti- cles onto embedded planets. To obtain an actual mass accretion Fig. 9. Accreted particles as a function of the particle stopping time, where their approximate size is also reported in the top x-axis, inte- grated over 50 planetary orbits (from t = 100 − 150). The VSI (solid line) and alpha disc model (dashed line) are compared. rate onto the planet, we need then to convolve this result with a dust size distribution. Birnstiel et al. (2012) showed that the size distribution is very steep for Stokes numbers less than 0.1. At that point, there is a gap due to the so-called meter-sized bar- rier. This effect removes the peak point of our accreted particles for the small mass planets and renders the accretion growth for smaller dust particles even steeper. For the bigger size objects, there are far fewer constraints from models. The leading theory of streaming instability predicts that the peak of formed plan- etesimals is 10 − 100 kilometer-sized objects with a tail in the distribution also to kilometer-sized objects, which represent our bigger size objects in the simulation (Simon et al. 2016, 2017). Fig. 10. To measure the accretion (and survival) efficiency, the evolution of particles initially within a ring outside the planet co-orbital region (defined as in eq. 34) is monitored. 6.1. Efficiency of pebble accretion Very important for the mass growth of a planetary core is the effi- ciency, Peff, of the accretion process, i.e. the number of accreted particles onto the planet divided by the number of particles that would otherwise drift across the location of the planet in an un- perturbed disc. Following Ormel & Klahr (2010), we define this efficiency as Macc Mdrift Peff = (32) , where Macc is the actual accretion rate of solids onto the proto- planet and Mdrift the particle drift rate through the disc, given by Table 3. Comparison of the efficiency of pebble accretion with Stokes number one, for three cases. Model Hill (eq. 38) Col (from eq. 35) turb (simulations) Planet Masses 5M⊕ 0.43 0.67 10M⊕ 0.50 0.80 3 · 10−2 1.6 · 10−2 Mdrift = 2πrΣpvdrift , (33) where Σp is the particle surface density and vdrift is given by eq. (28). The quantity Peff in eq. (32) is, in fact, the probabil- ity that a particle that drifts through the disc is accreted by the protoplanet. When analysing the data in this way we encountered the problem that for the particles with very small and very large Stokes numbers the drift velocities vdrift are very small (in agree- ment with eq. 28) such that the calculated efficiencies became very high because of the relatively large amount of particles ac- creted. The reason for this lies in the fact that the accreted small and large particles originate primarily from the horseshoe region and did not migrate to the planet, which is only a transient effect visible in the initial phase of the simulations. Hence, we decided to use an alternative way of measuring the efficiency of parti- cle accretion from our simulation, which is illustrated in Fig. 10. To measure the accretion efficiency of particles on to a grow- ing planet we monitor the evolution of particles that are initially in a ring just outside the planet. We use the radial range from xs to 2xs, where xs is the horseshoe half-width as defined, by Paardekooper & Papaloizou (2009), as (cid:19)1/2 (cid:18) q h xs = 1.68 Rp . (34) Radial drift brings the particles into the co-orbital region of the planet. Some of the particles are accreted (and marked so), while others are able to cross the horseshoe region and are not accreted. These latter particles enter the inner region of the domain and are called the survivors. The results of using this procedure for our simulations are shown in Fig. 11 for the different planet masses and particle sizes. For the two larger planet masses (30 M⊕ and 100 M⊕) the results are not very meaningful because the total number of ac- creted particles is very small as they have already reached their isolation masses. Hence, for the growth of planets, we focus on the two smaller mass planets (5 M⊕ and 10 M⊕). In both cases the lowest accretion efficiency is reached for particles with Stokes number τs ≈ 1. For smaller and larger particles the efficiency rises but due to the very slow drift speeds becomes unreliable for very small (τs < 10−2) and large particles (τs > 10 − 100). The result shows that particles with fast radial drift (τs around unity) have small accretion efficiencies because a high percent- age of particles can cross the planetary orbit. For Stokes number τs = 1, we find Peff ≈ 1.6% for the 5 M⊕ and around 3% for the 10 M⊕ planet. We can compare our measurements to the results of previous estimates using particle trajectories in the vicinity of the planet. We use our set-up with the protoplanet located at Rp = 5.2 au. The radial drift speed is then vdrift = 30 m/s and for the particle density we have with 1% in solids Σp = 2 g/cm2. To calculate the efficiency we use eq. (37) from Ormel & Klahr (2010) with log10 Pcol = 0.5 for the (dimensionless) collision rate, and drop Article number, page 13 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE Fig. 11. Efficiency of accreted (red line) and survived particles (green line) as a function of Stokes number for different planetary masses. The laminar disc run is represented with solid lines, while the VSI run with dashed lines. The fit from Lambrechts & Johansen (2014) is overplotted for intermediate τs values with a dashed grey line (see eq. 40). (35) the 3D correction. The specific collision rate Pcol is given in this case by (see their eq. 3) Mcol = PcolΣp RHvH , where vH = ΩKRH (36) is the Hill velocity. For an alternative comparison, we use the accretion rate in the Hill regime as given in Lambrechts & Jo- hansen (2012), also in the 2D version MHill = 2ΣpRHvH , (37) i.e. the ratio of these two is given by 100.5/2 ≈ 1.6. To com- pare directly to other estimates we can transform our obtained accretion rates in terms of the Hill accretion rate and define fHill ≡ Macc MHill Applying the definitions of vdrift, RH and vH from eqs. (28, 25) and (36), one obtains with τs = 1 and η = (H/R)2 fHill ≈ 6.5 Peff Rpvdrift RHvH (cid:32) h Mdrift MHill = Peff π = Peff (cid:33)2 (38) (39) . . q1/3 Using this equation and our findings for the particle accretion we obtain the results quoted in Table 3. We notice that our esti- mates are about 50% lower than the 2D approximation for the Hill case, but here we also conside the third dimension, which can lower the amount of particles within the reach of an embed- ded planet. In Fig. 11 we compare also the accretion efficiency with the prescription from Lambrechts & Johansen (2014), that is Peff,LJ (cid:39) 0.034 where we see that although our result are slightly lower, the scal- ing with the Stokes number and planetary masses for the inter- mediate τs, for which our approach was reliable, is consistent. (cid:19)−1/3(cid:32) Mc (cid:33)2/3(cid:18) (cid:19)−1/2 (cid:18) τs From our simulation, we may estimate the mass doubling 10 au (40) M⊕ 0.1 r , time for our low mass planets, for which we use tdouble = Mcore Macc . (41) With our results on Peff we find tdouble = 20, 000 yr for the small mass planets. The region in the disc that can supply this amount of solid material within the time tdouble extends to roughly 36 au assuming a constant surface density of solids, Σp = 2 g/cm2. Article number, page 14 of 18 Fig. 12. Comparison between the average drift speed of the different dust size particles. These values are calculated at the end of the simu- lation at R = 1.8 with the analytical drift speed (black solid line), the migration speed of a 5 M⊕ (dotted line), and a 10 M⊕ (dashed line) mass planet. The error bars reflect the impact of radial diffusion for the vari- ous stopping times. The smaller particle sizes in the VSI simulation are migrating outwards rather then inwards due to the inverse meridional circulation Stoll et al. (2017a). 7. Discussion After having presented our main findings we now compare our results to other studies of particles embedded and accreted onto a planetary core in MHD turbulent discs. Then we shall discuss possible limitations of our simulations because in performing the simulations we had to use several approximations to make them feasible. 7.1. Comparison to MHD simulations Recently, Xu et al. (2017) studied the accretion of particles onto small planets embedded in discs exhibiting magnetically driven turbulence. These authors considered a local shearing box cen- tred at the growing core and studied three different types of discs: a fully turbulent disc using ideal MHD, a less turbulent disc with ambipolar diffusion, and a non-turbulent hydrodynamic disc. For all three cases, particles with various Stokes numbers were in- jected to the flow after reaching equilibrium, and the accretion rate of particles onto the core was measured. The measured par- ticle accretion rates were then compared to that in the 2D Hill Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence regime as estimated by Lambrechts & Johansen (2012). In all cases these authors found for Stokes numbers around unity that their measured rates agree very well (within ≈ 10%) with the 2D accretion rate of eq. (37) in Lambrechts & Johansen (2012) and argue for a high accretion efficiency. In our simulations we measure the absolute accretion efficiency as defined in eq. (32) and this is much lower than one for 10−2 ≤ τs ≤ 1, with an ad- ditional drop towards τs = 1; see Fig. 11. To compare directly to Xu et al. (2017) we can use eq. (38) and the values quoted in Tab. 3, which shows that our calculated accretion rates are about 50% smaller than theirs. The higher rates obtained by Xu et al. (2017) may be a re- sult of the relatively small vertical and radial extent of the disc in their simulations (only one H in each direction) and the fact that they do not consider a stream of particles through their do- main. Hence, they measure the transient accretion rate of parti- cles present initially in the computational box. In our case we measure the accretion rate of particles in an equilibrium situa- tion. The absolute accretion efficiency, as defined in eq. (32), is more important; we measure this rate directly. This is actually very low, but the combination with the large drift speed allows us to tap a larger reservoir of particles making the accretion of τs = 1 particles very useful in the overvall growth process. 7.2. Planet migration In our simulations, the location of the planet is kept fixed at 5.2 au. However, planets interact gravitationally with their pro- toplanetary disc, and this usually results in an inwards migration through the disc, which may modify our conclusions about the capture efficiency of particles. To check the impact of planet mi- gration we compare the particle drift rates to the expected planet migration for which we use the 3D results of D'Angelo & Lubow (2010) for low mass planets in the linear regime, as stated in (Kley & Nelson 2012) (cid:18) H (cid:19)2 Ω−1 K , M2 (cid:63) r MpΣg(rp)r2 p tmig = C (42) where C = 1/(1.36 + 0.62βΣ + 0.43βT). The value βΣ = p − 1 is the coefficient of the surface density profile, while βT = q is the coefficient of the temperature radial profile. In our models we used βΣ = 0.5 and βT = 1.0 (see Sect. 4.1) and then we find C = 0.48. In Figure 12 we compare the dust drift velocity measured at the beginning of the simulations, when the planet has not yet perturbed the disc structure, to the theoretical drift speed (as obtained from eq. 28; black solid line), and the migra- tion speed of the two small planets (two dashed lines). We can see that only the tails of the particle size distribution drift slower than the planets. However, pebble-sized particles have a migra- tion speed orders of magnitude faster than the planet. Hence, we conclude that any planet migration does not influence our results for pebble accretion. For larger mass planets that migrate with Type II migration, the drift speed slows down considerably, and their masses are well above the pebble isolation mass. The im- pact of non-circular planetary orbits on the pebble accretion ef- ficiency was studied recently by Liu & Ormel (2018) who found that it can be increased slightly for moderately eccentric orbits. 7.3. Equation of state In our simulations, we used an isothermal equation of state and now briefly discuss a possible impact of including radiative ef- fects. The inclusion of radiative transfer leads to finite cooling times of the gas that lowers the efficiency of the VSI-driven tur- bulence (Nelson et al. 2013). In full simulations that include ra- diative transfer it has been shown that in irradiated discs an ef- ficiency of α ≈ 10−4 can be reached (Stoll & Kley 2014, 2016), while Flock et al. (2017) find a somewhat smaller value. All those simulations apply to larger distances from the star and it remains to be seen what the VSI-efficiency is at shorter dis- tances from the star. In any case, a reduced turbulence level leads to a concentration of the dust particles in the midplane, which might enhance the accretion process. On the other hand, the in- clusion of radiative transfer allows for additional disc heating by the planet (by the spiral waves), which enhances the disc tem- perature and might lead to partial evaporation of the particles. However, for the lower mass planets, for which the dust accre- tion efficiency is higher, the effect on the disc is not be that strong and we do not expect a large impact. Additionally, the dust clear- ing around the planet alters the opacity of the medium and hence the radiative transport. These impacts of radiative transport and the link to observations have to be investigated in more detail by future simulations. 7.4. Dust feedback In our simulations we have neglected the backreaction of the dust onto the gas. Within a disc without an embedded planet the par- ticle concentrations are such that the dust density remains typ- ically smaller than the gas density, given an initial dust to gas ration of 1/100. In the presence of a planet, this is not true in the case of filtering because then the dust density can equal the gas density near the pressure maximum. This situation has recently been explored by Weber et al. (2018), who showed that dust feedback can potentially displace the gas density maximum, and thus the pressure maximum, outwards. Additional dust diffusion (for example from disc turbulence) can smooth the density peak of the dust distribution, altering the dust filtration process for particles with Stokes numbers around unity. However, concern- ing the filtration ability, which also affects pebble accretion onto the planet, they did not observe any difference by adding dust feedback. Hence, we conclude that dust feedback does not im- pact our results significantly. In a realistic scenario, where a dust size distribution is present, this effect is even less pronounced. The impact of dust feedback onto the dust dynamics in the dust trap itself will have to be investigated in more detail in the future. 7.5. Numerical convergence Our hydrodynamical simulations are performed with one numer- ical resolution as given in Table 1. This is based on our results in Stoll et al. (2017b) in which we studied the effect of doubling the grid resolution on the VSI and found no noticeable differ- ences in the disc dynamics. The calculated αSS close to the inner boundary (see their Figure 1) was increased marginally, however it had no effect at the location of the planet. We also checked in Stoll et al. (2017b) that the torque acting onto the planet reached a constant value (see their Figure 6), guaranteeing that the model was run long enough for the disc-planet system to have reached a quasi-stable state. The obtained torque distributions on the planet were also identical for the standard resolution (used here) and the simulations with doubled resolution. The dust dynamics is not affected by numerical resolution since we did not take into account their backreaction on the gas. Thus, we do not expect that our results on accretion efficiencies and dust dynamics in Article number, page 15 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE the vicinity of the planet are impacted by resolution that is too low. 8. Conclusions In this study we have modelled the dynamics of a broad range of solid particles, ranging from 100 µm dust particles to kilometer- sized planetesimals, interacting with a growing planetary core in a 3D globally isothermal disc. By modelling a global disc, we were able to take into account the effect of MMRs for planetesimal-sized objects and the enhanced particle density in spiral arms and vortices. The turbulence driving the disc evolu- tion has been modelled both self-consistently through the VSI in- stability and with an alpha parameter derived from the VSI simu- lation where the turbulence has been recreated in the particle dy- namics by adding random kicks to their motion. We determined the solid accretion rate onto the planet after it reaches a stable state averaging the values over 50 planetary orbits in Fig. 9. The actual growth rates in particles that a planet can achieve depends on the particle size distribution. In our study, we sample the particle dynamics in ten different size bins. One can convolve this result with a model of dust size distribution to obtain a mass accretion rate onto the planet. We observed a peak in the absolute number of accreted particles in the range of pebble-sized objects (100 cm) with Stokes number of order unity, but the strength of this effect depends strongly on the chosen dust size distribution. Concerning the accretion efficiency we find that the minimum ef- ficiency is reached for particles with τs = 1, where Peff = 0.016 and 0.03 for the planets with masses 5 M⊕ and 10 M⊕, respec- tively. For smaller and larger particles the efficiency rises but due to the rapid inwards drift of particles with τs = 1, we find that the optimal particle size for pebble accretion for our massive cores is about one metre at the orbit distance of about 5 au. If all the solid material in the disc was this size range, the mass dou- bling time would be around 20,000 yrs. We find that the obtained accretion efficiencies are very similar for the VSI turbulent disc and the laminar disc models, one has to keep in mind however to add the stochastic kicks to the particles for the viscous model. This similarity can be attributed to the fact that the overall turbu- lence generated by the VSI is relatively weak such that the disc structures are very similar, despite the occurrence of vortices in the VSI case. The accretion efficiency found in our simulations agrees rea- sonably well with previous results, for example, the 2D approx- imations of Ormel & Klahr (2010) and Lambrechts & Johansen (2012) or the 3D turbulent simulations of Xu et al. (2017) who found similar results for particles with τs = 1. To obtain the effi- ciencies of very small or large particles exactly one needs longer integration time due to the very slow radial drift. Concerning the pebble isolation mass of a growing planet we confirm that the oc- currence of a pressure maximum in the gas created by the planet is sufficient to filter particles with Stokes numbers of unity ef- ficiently, at least for the relatively weak VSI turbulence. Hence, using purely hydrodynamical studies the dependence of the iso- lation mass on the viscosity and pressure scale height of the disc has been examined recently to obtain scaling relations (Bitsch et al. 2018). The treatment of the turbulence adopted for the particles in the laminar disc produced accretion rates in good agreement with those of the self-consistent VSI treatment. The impact of ra- diative transfer within the disc and the migration of the planet through the disc were not treated. These topics need to be ad- dressed in future work. Article number, page 16 of 18 Acknowledgements. We thank the anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. The very helpful discussions with Chris Ormel are gratefully ac- knowledged. G. Picogna acknowledges the support through the German Re- search Foundation (DFG) grant KL 650/21 within the collaborative research pro- gramme "The first 10 Million Years of the Solar System". M.H.R. Stoll acknowl- edges the support through the (DFG) grant KL 650/16. This work was performed on the computational resource ForHLR I funded by the Ministry of Science, Re- search and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg, and the DFG. This research was supported by the Munich Institute for Astro- and Particle Physics (MIAPP) of the DFG cluster of excellence "Origin and Structure of the Universe". References Alexander, R. D. & Pascucci, I. 2012, MNRAS, 422, L82 Armitage, P. J. 2010, Astrophysics of Planet Formation, 294 Auffinger, J. & Laibe, G. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 796 Ayliffe, B. A., Laibe, G., Price, D. J., & Bate, M. R. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1450 Bai, X.-N. & Stone, J. M. 2010, ApJS, 190, 297 Baines, M. J., Williams, I. P., & Asebiomo, A. S. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 63 Birnstiel, T., Klahr, H., & Ercolano, B. 2012, A&A, 539, A148 Bitsch, B., Morbidelli, A., Johansen, A., et al. 2018, ArXiv e-prints Bockelée-Morvan, D., Gautier, D., Hersant, F., Huré, J.-M., & Robert, F. 2002, [arXiv:1801.02341] A&A, 384, 1107 Buhler, P. B., Knutson, H. A., Batygin, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 26 Charnoz, S., Fouchet, L., Aleon, J., & Moreira, M. 2011, ApJ, 737, 33 D'Angelo, G. & Lubow, S. H. 2010, ApJ, 724, 730 D'Angelo, G., Weidenschilling, S. J., Lissauer, J. J., & Bodenheimer, P. 2014, Icarus, 241, 298 Dipierro, G. & Laibe, G. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1932 Dipierro, G., Laibe, G., Price, D. J., & Lodato, G. 2016, MNRAS, 459, L1 Dubrulle, B., Morfill, G., & Sterzik, M. 1995, Icarus, 114, 237 Duncan, M., Quinn, T., & Tremaine, S. 1989, Icarus, 82, 402 Ercolano, B. & Pascucci, I. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1704.00214] Ercolano, B. & Rosotti, G. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3008 Flock, M., Dzyurkevich, N., Klahr, H., Turner, N. J., & Henning, T. 2011, ApJ, 735, 122 Flock, M., Nelson, R. P., Turner, N. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 131 Fortney, J. J. & Nettelmann, N. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 423 Fromang, S. & Nelson, R. P. 2009, A&A, 496, 597 Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., & Adachi, I. 1977, PASJ, 29, 163 Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, Physica Scripta Volume T, 130, 014024 Kary, D. M., Lissauer, J. J., & Greenzweig, Y. 1993, Icarus, 106, 288 Klahr, H. & Kley, W. 2006, A&A, 445, 747 Kley, W. & Nelson, R. P. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211 Kwok, S. 1975, ApJ, 198, 583 Lambrechts, M. & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32 Lambrechts, M. & Johansen, A. 2014, A&A, 572, A107 Lambrechts, M., Johansen, A., & Morbidelli, A. 2014, A&A, 572, A35 Liu, B. & Ormel, C. W. 2018, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1803.06149] Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228 Morbidelli, A. & Nesvorny, D. 2012, A&A, 546, A18 Nakagawa, Y., Hayashi, C., & Nakazawa, K. 1983, Icarus, 54, 361 Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., & Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375 Nakazawa, K. & Nakagawa, Y. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- 2790 ment, 70, 11 Nelson, R. P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O. M. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2610 Ormel, C. W. & Klahr, H. H. 2010, A&A, 520, A43 Paardekooper, S.-J. 2007, A&A, 462, 355 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Mellema, G. 2004, A&A, 425, L9 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Mellema, G. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 2297 Picogna, G. & Kley, W. 2015, A&A, 584, A110 Picogna, G. & Marzari, F. 2015, A&A, 583, A133 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Rosotti, G. P., Juhasz, A., Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2016, MNRAS, 459, Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Li, R., & Youdin, A. N. 2016, ApJ, 822, 55 Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Youdin, A. N., & Li, R. 2017, ApJ, 847, L12 Stoll, M. H. R. & Kley, W. 2014, A&A, 572, A77 Stoll, M. H. R. & Kley, W. 2016, A&A, 594, A57 Stoll, M. H. R., Kley, W., & Picogna, G. 2017a, A&A, 599, L6 Stoll, M. H. R., Picogna, G., & Kley, W. 2017b, A&A, 604, A28 Testi, L., Birnstiel, T., Ricci, L., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 339 Weber, P., Benítez-Llambay, P., Gressel, O., Krapp, L., & Pessah, M. E. 2018, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1801.07971] Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Weidenschilling, S. J. & Davis, D. R. 1985, Icarus, 62, 16 Whipple, F. L. 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 52, 565 Whipple, F. L. 1972, in From Plasma to Planet, ed. A. Elvius, 211 Williams, J. P. & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67 Wisdom, J. 1980, AJ, 85, 1122 Woitke, P. & Helling, C. 2003, A&A, 399, 297 Xu, Z., Bai, X.-N., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2017, ApJ, 847, 52 Youdin, A. N. & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin, A. N. & Lithwick, Y. 2007, Icarus, 192, 588 Young, R. E. 2003, New A Rev., 47, 1 Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., Rafikov, R. R., & Bai, X.-n. 2014, ApJ, 785, 122 Giovanni Picogna et al.: Particle accretion onto planets in discs with hydrodynamic turbulence Appendix A: Long-term two-dimensional integrations Fig. A.1. Ratio of the azimuthal gas velocity to the Keplerian value for a 2D disc with an embedded 10 M⊕ planet at different times after insertion of the planet. The simulation in the left panel uses a viscosity of α = 10−4 and the right α = 5 × 10−4. In Figure 4 above we displayed the ratio of the angular velocity of the gas to the Keplerian velocity for the different planet masses and compared the turbulent case to the viscous laminar case. From this, we argued that the occurrence of super-Keplerian flow can be taken as an indication of having reached the isolation mass for that particular planet. However, this argument is only valid if the equilibrium of the flow has already been reached and does not change in time significantly anymore. For a viscous disc with a kinematic viscosity ν, the viscous timescale is given by τν = ∆r2 ν , (A.1) where ∆r2 is the spatial region under consideration. Assuming an α-type viscosity with ν ∼ αΩKH2 and ∆r = fHH one finds for the viscous timescale τν = f 2 H 2πα PK , (A.2) where PK is the Keplerian period. The maximum of Ω occurs roughly at a distance of ∆r = 2H in our case and for fH = 2 eq. (A.2) gives an equilibration time of over 1200 orbits. To run our computations in full 3D for such a long timescale would have been too costly and we investigated this issue by performing comparison 2D simulations of planets embedded in flat discs. For these, we used a 10 M⊕ planet and two different effective viscosities, α = 5 × 10−4 and a lower viscosity case using α = 10−4. The results are shown in Fig. A.1. While for the low viscosity case the flow becomes super-Keplerian, the model with α = 5 × 10−4 remains sub-Keplerian throughout. From this, we infer that in VSI turbulent discs with an effective α = 5× 10−4 the isolation mass is indeed above 10 M⊕ as found in the full 3D simulations presented above. Appendix B: Integrator We used two different integrators to evolve the Lagrangian particles, based on their coupling with the gas dynamics. Appendix B.1: Semi-implicit integrator in polar coordinates The dynamics of particles well coupled to the gas, which have a stopping time much smaller than the time step adopted to evolve the gas dynamics, is described by adopting the semi-implicit Leapfrog (Drift-Kick-Drift) integrator described in Zhu et al. (2014) in polar coordinates. This method guarantees the conservation of the physical quantities for the long-term simulations performed in this paper and, at the same time, it is faster than an explicit method. The variables are updated beginning with a first half drift Lr,n+1 = Lr,n , rn+1 = rn + Lr,n dt 2 , Lθ,n+1 = Lθ,n , θn+1 = θn + 1 2  Lθ,n r2 n  dt 2 , + Lθ,n+1 r2 n+1 Lφ,n+1 = Lφ,n . φn+1 = φn + 1 2  Lφ,n R2 n  dt 2 , + Lφ,n+1 R2 n+1 Article number, page 17 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. Picognaetal2018LE followed by a kick step rn+2 = rn+1 , Lφ,n+2 = Lφ,n+1 + Lθ,n+2 = Lθ,n+1 + Lr,n+2 = Lr,n+1 + (cid:33) (cid:32) (cid:34) 1  1 2 φn+2 = φn+1 . Lφ,g,n+1 − Lφ,n+1 + ∂Φ ∂φ n+1 cos(θn+2) sin(θn+2) ts,n+1 (cid:32) Lφ,n+1 (cid:33)2 (cid:32) Lφ,n+1 (cid:32) Lφ,n+2 (cid:33)2 Rn+1 + + Rn+1 Rn+2 2rn+2 , (cid:35) (cid:32) Lφ,n+2 (cid:33)2 Rn+2 + θn+2 = θn+1 , − dt 1 + dt 2ts,n+1 dt 1 + dt 2ts,n+1 dt 1 + dt 2ts,n+1 (cid:33)2 − (cid:32) Lθ,n+1 rn+1 (cid:32) (cid:33)2 ∂Φ ∂θ + (cid:33) (cid:32) Lθ,n+2 n+1 + rn+2 Lθ,g,n+1 − Lθ,n+1 (cid:33) ts,n+1 (cid:32) (cid:33)2 − ∂Φ ∂r n+1  , Lr,g,n+1 − Lr,n+1 ts,n+1 + +  , and, for the laminar disc case, also a random kick, i.e. rn+2 = rn+2 + δrd,T , θn+2 = θn+2 + δθd,T , φn+2 = φn+2 + δφd,T . Finally, a second half drift follows as the first half drift. Appendix B.2: Fully-implicit integrator in polar coordinates For particles with stopping time much smaller than the numerical time step, the drag term can dominate the gravitational force term, causing the numerical instability of the integrator. Thus, it is necessary to adopt a fully implicit integrator following Bai & Stone (2010); Zhu et al. (2014). θ followed by a shift for the momenta We begin with a predictor step for the particle positions (cid:48) = θn + r(cid:48) = rn + Lr,ndt , (cid:32) (cid:34) (cid:17) · (cid:33)(cid:35) (cid:34) Lφ,n+1 = Lφ,n + dt/2 + 1 ∂Φ ∂φ ∂Φ ∂φ dt ts,n 1 + dt (cid:33)(cid:32) 2ts,nts,n+1 1 + (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:33) − − n+1 + dt (cid:33) + 2ts,n 2ts,n+1 ts,n+1 dt/2 + 1 (cid:16) 1 − Lφ,n − Lφ,g,n+1 (cid:16) 1 − Lθ,n − Lθ,g,n+1 (cid:16) 1 − Lr,n − Lr,g,n+1 ts,n+1 dt/2 + 1 2ts,n+1 2ts,n+1 2ts,n 2ts,n + + ts,n+1 (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:33) (cid:33) Lθ,n+1 = Lθ,n + 1 + dt − + ∂Φ ∂θ n+1 Lr,n+1 = Lr,n + 1 + dt − + ∂Φ ∂r n+1 Lθ,n r2 n dt , (cid:48) = φn + φ Lφ,n R2 n dt . − Lφ,n − Lφ,g,n ts,n + n n , − (cid:32) (cid:32) L(cid:48) (cid:32) ∂Φ ∂θ (cid:33) (cid:33)2(cid:33)(cid:32) (cid:33) φ R(cid:48) ∂Φ ∂r − dt 2ts,nts,n+1 cos(θ(cid:48)) sin(θ(cid:48)) + (cid:17) · (cid:34) (cid:17) ·  L(cid:48)2 dt 2ts,nts,n+1 1 r(cid:48) + n L2 θ,n+1 r(cid:48)2 φ,n+1 R(cid:48)2 + 1 + ts,n − Lθ,n − Lθ,g,n (cid:33)(cid:35) − Lr,n − Lr,g,n (cid:33)(cid:35) dt ts,n ts,n , (cid:33)(cid:32) + , 1 + dt ts,n (cid:32) Lφ,n (cid:33)2 R cos(θ(cid:48)) sin(θ(cid:48)) +  L2 φ,n R2 n 1 rn  + + L2 θ,n r2 n a turbulent kick for the laminar disc case rn = rn + δrd,T , θn = θn + δθd,T , φn = φn + δφd,T , and finally a corrector step for the particle positions. rn+1 = rn + 1 2 (Lr,n + Lr,n+1)dt , θn+1 = θn +  Lθ,n r2 n 1 2  dt , + Lθ,n+1 r2 n+1  Lφ,n R2 n 1 2  dt . + Lφ,n+1 R2 n+1 φn+1 = φn + Article number, page 18 of 18
1606.07438	2	1606	2016-12-15T17:29:21	Secular dynamics of multiplanet systems: implications for the formation of hot and warm Jupiters via high-eccentricity migration	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Hot Jupiters (HJs) are Jupiter-like planets that reside very closely to their host star, within $\sim 0.1\,\mathrm{AU}$. Their formation is not well understood. It is generally believed that they cannot have formed in situ, implying that some form of migration must have occurred after their initial formation. We study the production of HJs through secular evolution in multiplanet systems with three to five planets. In this variant of high-$e$ migration, the eccentricity of the orbit of the innermost planet is excited on secular time-scales, triggering orbital migration due to tidal dissipation. We use a secular dynamics code and carry out a population synthesis study. We find that HJs are only produced if the viscous time-scale is short ($\approx 0.014$ yr). In contrast, in up to $\approx 0.3$ of systems, the innermost planet is tidally disrupted. The orbital period distribution is peaked around 5 d, consistent with observations. The median HJ mass is $1\,M_\mathrm{J}$ with a maximum of $\approx 2 \, M_\mathrm{J}$, similar to observed HJs. Approximately 0.1 of the HJs have retrograde orbits with respect to the stellar spin. We do not find any warm Jupiters in our simulations, i.e. planets with semimajor axes between 0.1 and 1 AU.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Preprint August 31, 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Secular dynamics of multiplanet systems: implications for the formation of hot and warm Jupiters via high-eccentricity migration Adrian S. Hamers1⋆, Fabio Antonini2,3, Yoram Lithwick2,3, Hagai B. Perets4 and Simon F. Portegies Zwart1 1Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 2Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA), Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA 4Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel Accepted 2016 September 15. Received 2016 September 12; in original form 2016 June 23 ABSTRACT Hot Jupiters (HJs) are Jupiter-like planets that reside very closely to their host star, within ∼ 0.1 AU. Their formation is not well understood. It is generally believed that they cannot have formed in situ, implying that some form of migration must have occurred after their initial formation. We study the production of HJs through secular evolution in multiplanet systems with three to five planets. In this variant of high-e migration, the eccentricity of the orbit of the innermost planet is excited on secular time-scales, triggering orbital migration due to tidal dissipation. We use a secular dynamics code and carry out a population synthesis study. We find that HJs are only produced if the viscous time-scale is short (≈ 0.014 yr). In contrast, in up to ≈ 0.3 of systems, the innermost planet is tidally disrupted. The orbital period distribution is peaked around 5 d, consistent with observations. The median HJ mass is 1 MJ with a maximum of ≈ 2 MJ, similar to observed HJs. Approximately 0.1 of the HJs have retrograde orbits with respect to the stellar spin. We do not find a significant population of warm Jupiters in our simulations, i.e. planets with semimajor axes between 0.1 and 1 AU. Key words: gravitation -- planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability -- planet- star interactions 1 INTRODUCTION In the past decades, radial velocity and transit methods have re- vealed a population of gas giant planets of order Jupiter mass around solar-type stars with orbital periods downward of 10 d, i.e. hot Jupiters (HJs). The current consensus is that HJs could not have formed in situ in the protoplanetary disc phase because of an insufficient amount of disc material and/or too high tem- peratures at these close regions to the host star (e.g. Lin et al. 1996; however, recently it has been suggested that in situ for- mation might be possible through core accretion, Lee et al. 2014; Batygin et al. 2016). If HJs were formed at larger separations, i.e. beyond the snow line of one to a few AU, then this implies that they must have experienced strong inwards migration after their formation, by two orders of magnitude in separation. Two main migration scenarios have been proposed: (1) migration induced by orbital energy dissipation due to gas drag in the protoplanetary disc phase (e.g. Goldreich & Tremaine 1980; Lin & Papaloizou 1986; Bodenheimer et al. 2000; Tanaka et al. 2002), and (2) migration in- duced by tidal dissipation in the HJ, requiring high orbital eccen- tricity (commonly known as 'high-e' migration). ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] c(cid:13) 2016 The Authors For high-e migration, various subscenarios have been pro- posed to drive the high eccentricities needed to produce the ob- served short orbital periods through tidal dissipation. They include (i) eccentricity excitation because of close encounters between planets (Rasio & Ford 1996; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Ford & Rasio 2008; Juri´c & Tremaine 2008; Beaugé & Nesvorný 2012), (ii) excitation of the eccentricity because of secular Lidov-Kozai (LK) oscillations (Lidov 1962; Kozai 1962) induced by a dis- tant binary companion star or an additional (massive) planet on an inclined orbit (Wu & Murray 2003; Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007; Naoz et al. 2012; Petrovich 2015a; Anderson et al. 2016; Petrovich & Tremaine 2016), (iii) secular eccentricity excitation induced by a close and coplanar, but eccentric planetary com- panion (Petrovich 2015b), and (iv) eccentricity excitation induced by secular chaos in multiplanet systems with at least three plan- ets in mildly inclined and eccentric orbits (Wu & Lithwick 2011; Lithwick & Wu 2011, 2014). It is currently unclear which of the two scenarios (1) and (2) applies to observed HJs, or if a combination gives rise to HJs. Both scenarios have successes and failures in describing properties of observed HJs. The observed period distribution of HJs peaks around ∼ 3 − 5 d, and their eccentricities are close to zero (e.g. Santerne et al. 2016). Most high-e migration scenarios predict that 2 Hamers et al. the final orbit of the HJ should indeed be circular and pile up a short period, around ∼ 3 d. Disc migration scenarios are more dif- ficult to reconcile with the observed peak in the period distribu- tion (but see Lin et al. 1996). On the other hand, high-e migration through LK cycles in three-body systems (subscenarios ii and iii) requires the presence of a stellar binary or compact planetary com- panion, which have not (yet) been detected around all HJs (e.g. Knutson et al. 2014; Ngo et al. 2015). Moreover, the predicted pro- duction rate is too low, and the predicted periods are too short (e.g. Anderson et al. 2016). Subscenario (iv) involves three or more planets around a sin- gle star, i.e. Np ≥ 3 systems (Wu & Lithwick 2011; Lithwick & Wu 2011, 2014). Similarly to three-body systems (i.e. a binary compan- ion or two planets), secular interactions can change the eccentrici- ties of the orbits, in particular the innermost orbit, on long time- scales (i.e. much longer than the orbital periods). For Np = 2, high relative inclinations (typically & 40◦) and/or tight and ec- centric outer orbits are required to produce high eccentricities. If Np ≥ 3, then the conditions for producing high eccentricities in the innermost orbit are less stringent. The initial eccentricities and rel- ative inclinations can be much smaller, and the planets need not be very closely spaced. Suborbital effects such as close encounters and mean motion resonances are then typically unimportant, and the long-term evolution is driven mainly by secular interactions. The secular evolution is typically chaotic, giving rise to highly irregular eccentricity oscillations. Over the course of ∼ 0.1 − 10 Gyr, high eccentricities can be reached in the inner orbit, potentially leading to HJs. A well known example is the Solar system, in which secular chaos can drive the orbit of Mercury to become unstable (i.e. lead to an ejection of the planet, or a collision of the planet with the Sun) on a time-scale of 5 Gyr, and with a probability of a few per cent (Laskar & Gastineau 2009; Lithwick & Wu 2014). The less stringent conditions for secular chaos in Np ≥ 3 sys- tems are compatible with current observations of HJs which ex- clude close-in companions for a subset of HJs, whereas detections of further-away companions (at & 5−10 AU) are still largely incom- plete because of observational limitations. This argument can also be reversed: the production of HJs through secular chaos requires further-away companions, therefore such companions are expected to be observed around HJ-hosting stars in the future. Parameter space studies and/or Monte Carlo studies to quan- tify observed properties of the HJs in multiplanet systems are still lacking. The long secular time-scales compared to the short orbital periods imply that direct N-body integrations, such as those car- ried out by Wu & Lithwick (2011) and Beaugé & Nesvorný (2012), are computationally very expensive to carry out, especially con- sidering the large number of parameters. Until recently, secular, orbit-averaged methods valid for high eccentricities and inclina- tions were limited to Np = 2 and to systems that are not too com- pact, as a consequence of the expansion of the Hamiltonian in terms of ratios of binary separations. In recent work (Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016), we pre- sented a generalization of the secular, orbit-averaged method previ- ously applied to hierarchical three-body systems (e.g. Lidov 1962; Kozai 1962; Harrington 1968; Naoz et al. 2013a), to systems com- posed of nested binary orbits, with an arbitrary number of bodies and an arbitrary hierarchy, and to fifth order in terms of binary sep- aration ratios for binary-binary interactions. In this paper, we apply this method to study the formation of HJs through secular evolu- tion in multiplanet systems with Np = 3 to Np = 5 planets. The main practical advantage of this method is that compared to direct N-body integrations, the evolution can be computed much faster. Using a combination of population synthesis and grid sam- pling, we study the dependence of the HJ properties on various pa- rameters, including the efficiency of tidal dissipation, the number of planets, the width of the initial mutual inclination and eccentric- ity distribution, and the radius of the innermost planet. These pa- rameters, in particular the efficiency of tidal dissipation, are highly uncertain. The structure of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we de- scribe the secular method and other assumptions and in Section 3, we verify it by comparing to a (limited) number of direct N-body integrations. In Section 4, we present the results from the popula- tion synthesis study. We discuss our results in Section 5, and con- clude in Section 6. 2 METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS 2.1 Notations and overview In Table 1, we give a list of relevant quantities with a description. Where applicable, we give for reference the values of the (initial) parameters that were assumed in the various sections of this paper. 2.2 Secular dynamics system, we used the the long-term gravitational dynamics of the mul- To model tiplanet algorithm SecularMultiple (Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016) within the AMUSE framework (Portegies Zwart et al. 2013; Pelupessy et al. 2013). Secular- Multiple applies to self-gravitating systems composed of nested binaries with an arbitrary number of bodies and an arbitrary hierar- chy. A multiplanet system is represented as a 'nested' hierarchical multiple system of point particles; the star is contained within the 'innermost' binary system (i.e. Jacobian coordinates; see e.g. fig. 3 of Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016). The algorithm is based on an expansion of the Hamiltonian in terms of binary separation ratios, which are assumed to be small. The resulting Hamiltonian is orbit averaged, and the equations of motion, defining a system of ordinary differential equations, are solved numerically in terms of the orbital vectors ek and hk for all binaries k. As shown in Hamers & Portegies Zwart (2016), depending on the compactness of the system, high orders are required to accu- rately describe the orbital evolution. Here, we included terms cor- responding to binary-binary interactions (pairwise terms) up and including fifth order in the separation ratios. To third order ('oc- tupole order'), we included the triplet binary terms (correspond- ing to interactions between three binaries), although these terms are unimportant for multiplanet systems with roughly equal-mass planets (Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016). For the fourth and fifth orders, terms associated with interactions between more than two binaries were not included; as shown in Hamers & Portegies Zwart (2016), these terms are unimportant compared to the pairwise bi- nary terms. Relativistic corrections were included by adding the orbit- averaged precession rates of the line of apsides to the or- bits, to the first post-Newtonian (PN) order. Terms in the PN potential associated with interactions between binaries (e.g. Naoz et al. 2013b) were neglected (see also appendix A7 of Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016). MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 3 Symbol Description Values in section Np M⋆ mi R⋆ Ri η tV,⋆ tV,1 kAM,⋆ kAM,1 rg,⋆ rg,1 Ps,⋆ Ps,1 θ⋆ θ1 ai ei ii ωi Ωi β Number of planets Stellar mass Mass of planet i Stellar radius Radius of planet i Tidal disruption factor (cf. equation 6) Stellar viscous time-scale Planet 1 viscous time-scale Stellar apsidal motion constant Planet 1 apsidal motion constant Stellar gyration radius Planet 1 gyration radius Stellar spin period Planet 1 spin period Stellar obliquity (stellar spin-orbit 1 an- gle) Planet 1 obliquity (planet 1 spin-orbit 1 angle) Planet i orbital semimajor axis 3 3 1 M⊙ 3 × 10−4 M⊙ (i = 1) 1 × 10−4 M⊙ (i > 1) 1 R⊙ 1 RJ − − ≈ 4.8 yr − 0.19 − − − − − − 1 AU (i = 1) 6 AU (i = 2) 12-62 AU (i = 3) Planet i orbital eccentricity Planet i orbital inclination1 Planet i argument of pericentre Planet i longitude of ascending node Width of inclination and eccentricity distribution ≈ 0.4-0.6 0-360◦ 0-360◦ − 4 3-5 1 M⊙ 0.5-5 MJ 1 R⊙ 1-1.5 RJ 2.7 5 yr 0.0137, 0.137, 1.37 yr 0.014 0.25 0.08 0.25 10 d 10 hr 0◦ 0◦ 1-4 AU (i = 1) 6-10 AU (i = 2) 15-30 AU (i = 3) 35-50 AU (i = 4) 60-100 AU (i = 5) 0-0.8 0-30◦ 0-360◦ 0-360◦ 8.2, 14.6, 32.8 Table 1. Description of the quantities used. Where applicable, we give the values of the (initial) parameters that are assumed in Sections 3 and 4. 2.3 Tidal evolution The tidal evolution of the innermost planet and the star was mod- elled with the equilibrium tide model of Eggleton et al. (1998). This model includes the effect of precession of the orbit of the innermost planet due to tidal bulges and rotation of both the star and innermost planet. We also included spin-orbit coupling and followed the spin directions of both the star and the innermost planet, assuming ini- tially zero obliquities. The equilibrium tide model is described in terms of the viscous time-scale tV, the apsidal motion constant kAM, the gyration radius rg and the initial spin period Ps, for both the star and the innermost planet. Our assumed values are given in Table 1. Most of the values are adopted from Fabrycky & Tremaine (2007). We assumed a constant tidal viscous time-scale tV for both the star and the innermost planet. Apart from its simplicity, a tempo- rally constant tV,1 for the innermost planet during high-e migration follows from the equations of motion with a number of physically motivated assumptions (Socrates & Katz 2012). We note that our assumption of a constant tV,1 is in contrast to Wu & Murray (2003); Wu & Lithwick (2011), who assumed a tV,1 depending on the or- bital period (Socrates et al. 2012). 3 VERIFICATION OF THE SECULAR METHOD WITH N-BODY INTEGRATIONS As mentioned in Section 1, the secular evolution of multiplanet systems can be chaotic, especially when the number of planets is MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Np ≥ 3. In direct N-body integrations, this implies that changing the initial orbital phases or the accuracy of the integration can lead to a completely different outcome after some time during which the eccentricities have changed by, say, the order of unity. This implies that it is not very meaningful -- on a one-to-one basis -- to compare results from direct N-body integrations to those from SecularMul- tiple, in which the orbits are averaged over. Our expectation is that SecularMultiple produces the correct secular dynamical evolution in a statistical sense, i.e. for an ensemble of systems. In this section, we investigate this expectation by comparing results from SecularMultiple to those from the direct N-body code ARCHAIN (Mikkola & Merritt 2008). The latter code uses algo- rithmic chain regularization to integrate the equations of motion with high precision. In addition to relativistic corrections, tidal in- teractions are taken into account with the same model assumed for the secular integrations. For more details regarding the direct N- body code, we refer to Antonini et al. (2016) and Antonini et al. (in preparation). 3.1 Initial conditions The ARCHAIN code was used to integrate 100 three-planet sys- tems for ≈ 120 Myr (cf. Table 1). The stellar mass was set to , and the planetary masses were assumed to be m1 = M⋆ = 1 M ⊙ 3×10−4 M ⊙ ≈ 0.314 MJ and m2 = m3 = 1×10−3 M ⊙ ≈ 1.05 MJ. The initial semimajor axes were assumed to be a1 = 1 AU, a2 = 6 AU, and a3 was varied between 12 and 62 AU with increments of 0.5 4 Hamers et al. 1.0 0.8 0.6 F D C 0.4 0 −2.0 −1.9 −1.8 −1.7 −1.6 −1.5 −1.4 0.2 0.0 −2.0 D ≈ 0.102; p ≈ 0.66 −1.5 −1.0 log10[a1,f(1 − e2 −0.5 1,f)/AU) 10 8 6 4 2 F D P F D C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 N -body secular 0.0 0.5 D ≈ 0.16; p ≈ 0.763 N -body secular 20 40 60 80 100 120 tHJ/Myr Figure 1. The distributions of the innermost planet's orbit semilatus rectum, r1,slr,f ≡ a1,f (cid:16)1 − e2 1,f(cid:17), after 120 Myr of evolution according to ARCHAIN (black solid line) and to SecularMultiple (red dashed line). The D and p statistics for the two-sided KS test between the distributions are indicated in the panel. In the inset, the PDF is shown for log10(r1,slr,f /AU) < −1.5. AU. The eccentricities and inclinations for all orbits were set equal to each other, and values were assumed ranging between ≈ 0.4 and 0.6 (with the inclinations measured in radians). The other orbital angles, ωi and Ωi, were sampled from flat distributions between 0 and 360◦. The innermost planet was assumed to have a radius R1 = 1 RJ, a viscous time-scale tV,1 ≈ 4.8 yr, and an apsidal motion constant kAM,1 = 0.19. Tidal disruptions were not checked for (in contrast to Section 4). With ARCHAIN, the typical integration time of a single sys- tem was ∼ 1 week (on a single CPU core). With comparable hard- ware, the corresponding integration time with SecularMultiple ranged between order 10 s (if there is no strong tidal evolution in the innermost orbit) to order a few min (if there is strong tidal evo- lution in the innermost orbit), corresponding to a speed-up factor between ∼ 103 and ∼ 104. 3.2 Results With ARCHAIN, a fraction of 0.32 of the systems became HJ sys- tems by 120 Myr, i.e. the final semilatus rectum of the orbit of the innermost planet, r1,slr,f ≡ a1,f (cid:16)1 − e2 1,f(cid:17), reached r1,slr,f < 0.091 AU, corresponding to the semimajor axis of a 10-d planet in a circular orbit around a Solar-mass star. We use the semilatus rectum to de- fine HJs, because after 120 Myr, some systems were still decaying tidally (i.e. a1 and e1 decreasing), while decoupled from the secular oscillations. In the latter case, when tidal evolution dominates, the final result (i.e. after ≫ 120 Myr) is a circular orbit with semima- jor axis a1,f = r1,slr,f. The HJ fraction after 120 Myr of evolution obtained with SecularMultiple is 0.33. In Fig. 1, we show the distribution of r1,slr,f after 120 Myr of evolution in terms of the cumulative density function (CDF) ac- cording to ARCHAIN (black solid line) and according to Secular- Multiple (red dashed line). There is a pileup of systems around log10(r1,slr,f /AU) ≈ −1.7 corresponding to systems in which a HJ was formed. The number of systems subsequently stalls at ≈ 0.32 with increasing r1,slr,f, until at log10(r1,slr,f /AU) ≈ −0.4, this number Figure 2. The CDF of the HJ formation times (see text for definition) according to ARCHAIN (black solid line) and to SecularMultiple (red dashed line). KS test statistics are indicated. increases again. The latter correspond to non- (or weakly) migrat- ing planets; either their semimajor axes have decreased slightly due to tidal evolution, and/or their eccentricities are excited because of secular evolution. In terms of r1,slr,f, there is statistical agreement between ARCHAIN and SecularMultiple; the two-sided Kolmogorov- Smirnov (KS; Kolmogorov 1933; Smirnov 1948) test statistics are D ≈ 0.082 and p ≈ 0.881. There is a tendency for SecularMul- tiple to (slightly) overestimate the smallest semilatus recta, or the smallest orbital periods of the HJs, compared to ARCHAIN. We do not believe that this discrepancy strongly affects our conclusions in the integrations in Section 4. In Fig. 2, we show another comparison between the two meth- ods in terms of the distributions of the HJ formation times, i.e. the times when r1,slr,f . 0.09 AU (corresponding to an orbital period of 10 d around a solar-mass star). With both methods, most (≈ 0.7) HJs are produced early in the evolution, i.e. within the first 10 Myr. The KS test yields D ≈ 0.16 and p ≈ 0.763, showing that the two distributions are statistically consistent. Nonetheless, the formation times in SecularMultiple after 10 Myr tend to be slightly longer. Despite the statistical consistencies as described above, it should be taken into account that the condition Ki j ≤ 0 occurred in both the secular and direct integrations. The quantity Ki j is de- fined for two adjacent orbits i and j, with a j > ai, as a j(1 − e j) − ai(1 + ei) RH;i j , Ki j ≡ where (1) ai + a j 3M⋆ !1/3 mi + m j 2 (2) RH;i j ≡ is the mutual Hill radius. With SecularMultiple, Ki j ≤ 0 occurred for ≈ 0.00016 and ≈ 0.021 of all output times for orbit pairs (1, 2) and (2, 3), respectively. With ARCHAIN, these fractions were ≈ 0.0002 and ≈ 0.015, for the same orbit pairs. If Ki j ≤ 0, then the assumptions on which the secular method is based formally break down, and results should be interpreted critically. In our popula- tion synthesis study (Section 4), integrations were stopped at oc- MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) currences of Ki j ≤ 0. To investigate whether this affects our con- clusions, some of the integrations were not stopped when Ki j ≤ 0. 4 POPULATION SYNTHESIS We used SecularMultiple to compute the dynamical evolution of a population of multiplanet systems with three to five planets. The innermost planet was initially located between 1 and 4 AU com- mensurate with planet formation just beyond the snow line. Taking into account tidal evolution, we focus on the orbital evolution of the innermost planet in the context of WJs and HJs. 4.1 Initial conditions To generate the initial conditions of our systems, we used a combi- nation of grid and Monte Carlo sampling. We defined a grid with the following parameters: (1) the viscous time-scale tV,1 of the in- nermost planet, (2) the number of planets Np, (3) β, which is related to the rms width of the initial inclination and eccentricity distribu- tion (see below), and (4) the radius of the innermost planet, R1. The following values were considered:  tV,1 Np β R1 ∈ n10−3, 10−2, 10−1, 100o tV,SKD; ∈ {3, 4, 5}; 180(cid:17)−2 ∈ (cid:26)(cid:16)20 π ,(cid:16)10 π ,(cid:16)15 π ≈ {8.2, 14.6, 32.8}; ∈ {1.0, 1.5} RJ. 180(cid:17)−2 180(cid:17)−2(cid:27) (3) For gas giant planets and high-e migration, Socrates et al. (2012) provided the constraint tV,1 . 1.2 × 104 hr, by requiring that a HJ at 5 d is circularized in less than 10 Gyr. We adopted a reference value tV,SKD = 1.2 × 104 h ≈ 1.37 yr , and considered tV,1 corresponding to 1, 10, 100 and 1000 times more efficient tides compared to tV,SKD (smaller tV,1 correspond to more efficient tides). The viscous time- scale tV,SKD corresponds to a tidal quality factor of Q1 ≈ 1.1 × 105 (cf. equation 37 from Socrates et al. 2012), and Q1 ∝ tV,1. We considered two planetary radii of 1 and 1.5 RJ. Large plan- etary radii might be expected because of inflation due to tidal heat- ing, and are also observed (this is known as the radius anomaly, Laughlin et al. 2011). For each of the 72 combinations of grid parameters, we sam- pled NMC = 1000 systems using the following approach. The masses mi of the Np planets were sampled from flat distributions with 0.5 MJ < mi < 5 MJ. The inclinations ii (as measured in ra- dians, and defined with respect to an arbitrary reference plane) and eccentricities ei of the planetary orbits were both sampled from a Rayleigh distribution, dN dx ∝ x exp(cid:16)−βx2(cid:17) , where β = hx2i−1 (assuming 0 < x < ∞) characterizes the width of the distribution. The sampling limits were 0 < ei < 0.8 and 0◦ < ii < 30◦. The arguments of pericentre ωi and the longitudes of the ascending nodes Ωi were sampled from flat distributions between 0◦ and 360◦. (4) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 5 distributions, with the fixed ranges  < a1 < 4.0 AU; 1.0 AU 6.0 AU < a2 < 10.0 AU; 15.0 AU < a3 < 30.0 AU; 35.0 AU < a4 < 50.0 AU; 60.0 AU < a5 < 100.0 AU. (5) These choices are somewhat arbitrary. The semimajor axes of plan- ets beyond ∼ 5 AU are still poorly constrained by observations. As- sumptions must therefore be made regarding the semimajor axes, in particular for orbits outside of the innermost planet. The ranges of a1, a2 and a3 are similar to the values that were assumed by Wu & Lithwick (2011) (1, 6 and 16 AU, respectively). The choice of a flat distribution, apart from its simplicity, is motivated by the ability to easily disentangle any dependence of the results on the semimajor axes. At any rate, it should be taken into account that our choice of the initial semimajor axes is not unique, and likely affects the results of the population synthesis. We rejected a sampled combination of mi, ai and ei if Ki j < K0 ≡ 2 for any adjacent pair (i, j) = (i, i + 1) of orbits (cf. equa- tion 1). The specific value of K0 is arbitrary. Choosing the value K0 = 0 would produce a large fraction of systems in which the sec- ular method is questionable from the start (cf. Section 3), whereas a large value of K0, say K0 = 12, would produce too-well-separated systems in which the eccentricities would hardly evolve, and no WJs or HJs would be formed. As a compromise, we set K0 = 2. For the other (non-sampled) initial parameters, we refer to the last column of Table 1. Regarding the star, we adopted a constant viscous time-scale of tV,⋆ = 5 yr. Assuming a (massless) compan- ion at an orbital period of 4 d, this corresponds to a tidal quality factor of Q ∼ 6 × 108 or Q′ ≡ 3Q/(4kAM,⋆) ∼ 3 × 106, which is typical for Solar-type stars (Ogilvie & Lin 2007). 4.2 Stopping conditions The integrations were stopped if one of the following conditions was met. (i) The integration time reached 10 Gyr. (ii) A HJ was formed, i.e. P1 < 10 d and e1 < 10−3. The orbit is then well within the regime of the decoupling of tidal from secular evolution, and there is no further evolution due to tides raised on the planet. Tides raised on the star are still important, but the time- scale for inspiral, ∼ 20 Gyr (assuming a stellar viscous time-scale of 5 yr), is longer than the Hubble time. (iii) The innermost planet was tidally disrupted by the star, i.e. rp,1 = a1(1 − e1) < rt, where rt is given by rt = ηR1 M⋆ m1 !1/3 . (6) Here, η is a dimensionless parameter; throughout, we assumed η = 2.7 (Guillochon et al. 2011). (iv) The condition Ki j ≤ 0 (cf. equation 1) occurred for any pair of adjacent orbits (i, j), i.e. the secular approximation formally broke down. We also carried out additional simulations for some parameter combinations without this stopping condition to investi- gate the sensitivity of our results on this condition. (v) The run time of the simulation exceeded 12 CPU hours (im- posed for practical reasons).2 The semimajor axes of the planets ai were sampled from flat 2 Depending on the parameters, the secular time-scales can be very short MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) 6 Hamers et al. fno migration tend/Gyr fHJ tend/Gyr fTD tend/Gyr fKi j≤0 tend/Gyr frun time exceeded tend/Gyr R1 /RJ 5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 0.822 0.820 0.912 0.929 0.987 0.990 0.347 0.324 0.580 0.552 0.867 0.886 0.117 0.107 0.239 0.264 0.669 0.660 0.835 0.819 0.913 0.920 0.990 0.988 0.305 0.334 0.565 0.565 0.887 0.884 0.086 0.106 0.243 0.246 0.684 0.640 0.807 0.815 0.921 0.924 0.990 0.988 0.355 0.376 0.536 0.551 0.893 0.885 0.111 0.123 0.262 0.261 0.688 0.666 0.835 0.844 0.916 0.909 0.981 0.993 0.334 0.361 0.577 0.562 0.885 0.889 0.094 0.130 0.249 0.235 0.715 0.700 10 0.816 0.810 0.906 0.921 0.986 0.989 0.321 0.298 0.547 0.520 0.858 0.870 0.092 0.085 0.209 0.214 0.612 0.592 0.818 0.807 0.908 0.912 0.990 0.988 0.289 0.300 0.544 0.531 0.872 0.866 0.068 0.091 0.201 0.202 0.633 0.586 0.798 0.804 0.913 0.921 0.989 0.988 0.331 0.348 0.499 0.515 0.872 0.868 0.081 0.095 0.220 0.227 0.628 0.615 0.824 0.836 0.908 0.903 0.981 0.992 0.304 0.343 0.543 0.529 0.869 0.872 0.073 0.098 0.197 0.200 0.662 0.646 tx 0.831 0.828 0.916 0.933 0.987 0.990 0.372 0.362 0.591 0.579 0.881 0.887 0.139 0.130 0.275 0.289 0.689 0.673 0.846 0.830 0.916 0.924 0.991 0.988 0.335 0.343 0.582 0.584 0.897 0.883 0.112 0.128 0.266 0.274 0.689 0.653 0.810 0.827 0.922 0.928 0.991 0.988 0.377 0.391 0.557 0.574 0.898 0.889 0.128 0.136 0.286 0.293 0.703 0.690 0.845 0.856 0.916 0.913 0.982 0.993 0.358 0.378 0.591 0.569 0.895 0.897 0.113 0.149 0.272 0.271 0.726 0.719 5 0.008 0.021 0.010 0.011 0.000 0.001 0.007 0.014 0.006 0.015 0.002 0.007 0.005 0.008 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.008 0.023 0.010 0.012 0.000 0.001 0.009 0.018 0.006 0.015 0.002 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.005 0.018 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 tx 0.007 0.018 0.009 0.010 0.000 0.001 0.006 0.013 0.006 0.015 0.002 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5 0.048 0.020 0.022 0.010 0.003 0.001 0.055 0.062 0.043 0.032 0.010 0.003 0.045 0.057 0.051 0.045 0.025 0.019 0.028 0.046 0.021 0.020 0.003 0.003 0.068 0.063 0.052 0.037 0.008 0.005 0.050 0.068 0.059 0.052 0.025 0.023 0.041 0.038 0.023 0.022 0.003 0.000 0.059 0.052 0.046 0.035 0.008 0.016 0.066 0.055 0.052 0.047 0.033 0.031 0.035 0.038 0.015 0.019 0.003 0.001 0.051 0.057 0.038 0.059 0.014 0.011 0.055 0.068 0.050 0.063 0.016 0.019 10 0.049 0.020 0.023 0.011 0.003 0.001 0.058 0.062 0.045 0.034 0.010 0.003 0.045 0.057 0.051 0.045 0.026 0.021 0.032 0.048 0.022 0.020 0.003 0.003 0.071 0.063 0.052 0.038 0.008 0.006 0.051 0.069 0.059 0.054 0.027 0.024 0.042 0.040 0.023 0.022 0.003 0.000 0.060 0.052 0.046 0.036 0.009 0.017 0.067 0.056 0.053 0.050 0.040 0.033 0.039 0.039 0.016 0.020 0.003 0.002 0.053 0.060 0.038 0.060 0.014 0.013 0.057 0.069 0.053 0.065 0.017 0.024 tx 0.047 0.019 0.021 0.010 0.003 0.001 0.056 0.059 0.041 0.031 0.008 0.003 0.043 0.054 0.051 0.043 0.022 0.020 0.027 0.045 0.021 0.018 0.003 0.003 0.068 0.062 0.050 0.035 0.007 0.005 0.050 0.066 0.057 0.051 0.023 0.019 0.041 0.035 0.021 0.022 0.003 0.000 0.057 0.051 0.046 0.033 0.007 0.012 0.066 0.054 0.049 0.045 0.033 0.032 0.033 0.037 0.014 0.016 0.003 0.001 0.051 0.056 0.035 0.055 0.013 0.011 0.056 0.067 0.049 0.060 0.016 0.018 5 0.122 0.138 0.056 0.050 0.010 0.008 0.591 0.600 0.371 0.400 0.121 0.102 0.833 0.828 0.705 0.676 0.301 0.312 0.135 0.133 0.065 0.059 0.006 0.008 0.627 0.601 0.383 0.396 0.105 0.108 0.864 0.824 0.696 0.701 0.290 0.336 0.152 0.147 0.056 0.054 0.007 0.012 0.586 0.572 0.418 0.414 0.099 0.099 0.823 0.822 0.685 0.692 0.279 0.303 0.130 0.118 0.069 0.072 0.016 0.006 0.615 0.582 0.385 0.379 0.101 0.100 0.851 0.802 0.700 0.701 0.269 0.280 10 0.127 0.146 0.061 0.054 0.011 0.009 0.611 0.622 0.401 0.429 0.130 0.117 0.853 0.844 0.732 0.708 0.325 0.362 0.146 0.140 0.069 0.067 0.006 0.008 0.638 0.635 0.404 0.426 0.118 0.121 0.878 0.831 0.729 0.728 0.322 0.369 0.160 0.156 0.064 0.057 0.008 0.012 0.607 0.599 0.453 0.442 0.117 0.114 0.843 0.845 0.719 0.718 0.314 0.339 0.137 0.125 0.076 0.077 0.016 0.006 0.642 0.596 0.419 0.406 0.115 0.112 0.866 0.827 0.742 0.729 0.304 0.310 tx 0.115 0.134 0.054 0.045 0.010 0.008 0.566 0.566 0.362 0.374 0.109 0.103 0.811 0.809 0.669 0.649 0.279 0.299 0.125 0.124 0.063 0.057 0.005 0.008 0.596 0.593 0.368 0.378 0.096 0.108 0.838 0.804 0.675 0.670 0.283 0.319 0.149 0.138 0.057 0.050 0.006 0.012 0.566 0.558 0.397 0.392 0.094 0.099 0.805 0.809 0.663 0.661 0.259 0.277 0.122 0.107 0.070 0.071 0.015 0.006 0.590 0.566 0.374 0.375 0.092 0.092 0.831 0.782 0.678 0.668 0.256 0.261 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.014 0.032 0.016 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.007 0.010 0.015 0.018 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.007 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.004 0.008 0.005 0.018 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.005 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.006 0.017 0.020 tx 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.005 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 tV,1 /yr 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−3 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 10−1 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 1.37 × 100 Np 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 β 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 Table 2. Outcomes of the NMC = 1000 Monte Carlo realizations for various combinations of the grid parameters tV,1 (in units of yr, rounded to two decimal places), Np, β (rounded to one decimal place) and R1 (in units of RJ). MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 7 fno migration tend/Gyr fHJ tend/Gyr fTD tend/Gyr fKi j≤0 tend/Gyr frun time exceeded tend/Gyr tV,1 /yr 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 1.37 × 10−2 Np 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 β 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 8.2 8.2 14.6 14.6 32.8 32.8 R1 /RJ 5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.835 0.917 0.913 0.973 0.990 0.996 0.305 0.805 0.565 0.879 0.887 0.980 0.086 0.637 0.243 0.785 0.684 0.954 10 0.818 0.916 0.908 0.973 0.990 0.996 0.289 0.788 0.544 0.868 0.872 0.976 0.068 0.586 0.201 0.744 0.633 0.913 tx 0.846 0.922 0.916 0.974 0.991 0.996 0.335 0.812 0.582 0.880 0.897 0.979 0.112 0.641 0.266 0.790 0.689 0.952 5 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.001 10 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.009 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.002 tx 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.007 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.001 5 0.028 0.080 0.021 0.025 0.003 0.004 0.068 0.169 0.052 0.106 0.008 0.019 0.050 0.306 0.059 0.191 0.025 0.044 10 0.032 0.080 0.022 0.025 0.003 0.004 0.071 0.180 0.052 0.111 0.008 0.021 0.051 0.319 0.059 0.204 0.027 0.048 tx 0.027 0.075 0.021 0.024 0.003 0.004 0.068 0.164 0.050 0.106 0.007 0.019 0.050 0.298 0.057 0.181 0.023 0.039 5 0.135 − 0.065 − 0.006 − 0.627 − 0.383 − 0.105 − 0.864 − 0.696 − 0.290 − 10 0.146 − 0.069 − 0.006 − 0.638 − 0.404 − 0.118 − 0.878 − 0.729 − 0.322 − tx 0.125 − 0.063 − 0.005 − 0.596 − 0.368 − 0.096 − 0.838 − 0.675 − 0.283 − 5 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.049 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.001 10 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.018 0.000 0.016 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.086 0.010 0.050 0.018 0.037 tx 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.014 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.054 0.001 0.027 0.005 0.008 Table 3. Similar to Table 2, here showing results from a subset of simulations without the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition which can be recognized from the entries with fKi j≤0 marked as −. For convenience, the corresponding entries with the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition enabled are included as well (repeated from Table 2). 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Overview Our results are summarized in Table 2. For each combination of tV,1, Np, β and R1, we list the fractions with respect to the NMC = 1000 Monte Carlo-sampled systems of the following outcomes, closely related to the stopping conditions. (i) No migration occurred, i.e. the final orbital period P1 > 100 d ( fno migration). (ii) A HJ was formed ( fHJ; WJs: see below). (iii) The innermost planet was tidally disrupted ( fTD). (iv) Ki j ≤ 0 occurred for any orbit pair ( fKi j≤0). (v) The maximum run time of 12 CPU hours was exceeded ( frun time exceeded). These fractions are given after either 5 or 10 Gyr of integration, or by sampling a random time between 100 Myr and 10 Gyr for each of the systems, corresponding to a constant star formation rate (indicated with tx in the table; output times were separated by 100 Myr). For tV,1 ≈ 1.4 × 10−2 yr and R1 = 1 RJ, we also carried out simulations without the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition. The results from the latter simulations are given in Table 3, and can be recog- nized in that table from the entries with fKi j≤0 marked as −. The fractions of HJs formed are typically low; the largest frac- tion is 0.023, obtained after 10 Gyr for the set of simulations with tV,1 ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 yr, Np = 3, β ≈ 8.2 and R1 = 1.5 RJ. In contrast, the fraction of tidal disruptions is larger, typically a few per cent, and reaching values of ≈ 0.2−0.3 for Np = 5 if the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition is not imposed (cf. Table 3). The number of WJs (defined as planets with an orbital period between 10 and 100 d at a given time) is even smaller than the number of HJs, and the associated fractions are not included in Ta- bles 2 and 3. Among the 72,000 integrations in Table 2, 186 HJs compared to the integration time of 10 Gyr, implying that a very large num- ber of oscillations need to be computed. Consequently, some simulations can take several hours to complete, in contrast to Section 3, in which the secular time-scales are typically short compared to the integration time of 120 Myr (see also Section 5.1). MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) were formed after 10 Gyr, whereas the number of WJs at that time is 11 (the number of WJs and HJs at 5 Gyr is seven and 166, re- spectively). Moreover, the semimajor axes of the WJs are ≈ 0.1 AU (cf. Fig. 4), i.e. the WJs are on the 'hot' end of the WJ spectrum, and near the (not well-defined) boundary between WJs and HJs. For values of tV,1 & 1.4 × 10−2 yr, i.e. for relatively weak tidal dissipation strength in the innermost planet, no HJs are formed at all, for any of the combinations of the grid parameters. Note that the number of Monte Carlo realizations per parameter combination was limited to NMC = 1000, implying that the HJ fractions could be less than 0.001, but nonzero. Also, uncertainties associated with the stopping condition Ki j ≤ 0 and premature terminations of the integrations because of the exceeding of the maximum run time, should be taken into account. These are discussed in more detail in Section 5.1. Note that the cumulative 'non-migrating' fractions in Table 2 are typically lower compared to the fraction of HJs found in Sec- tion 3. This can be attributed to the high initial eccentricities and inclinations that were assumed in Section 3, of ≈ 0.5, whereas they were typically lower in the population synthesis. 4.3.2 Final orbital period distributions In Fig. 3, we show the distributions of the orbital periods of the in- nermost planet at various times, combining results from all parame- ter combinations. With the solid lines, we show the distributions for the 'non-disruptive' systems in which a WJ or HJ was formed, or no migration occurred (i.e. excluding outcomes iii through v from Section 4.3.1). We consider the distributions after 5 Gyr (red line), 10 Gyr (blue line), and assuming a random time for each system between 100 Myr and 10 Gyr (tx; green line). The crosses show the (unbiased) observed distribution from Santerne et al. (2016); error bars are indicated with black lines. Open circles show the distribu- tion from fig. 23 of Anderson et al. (2016) for m1 ≡ Mp = 1 MJ and χ = 100, where χ ≡ 10 τ1/s and τ1 is the tidal time lag of the innermost planet (cf. table 1 of the latter paper). With kAM,1 = 0.25 (cf. Table 1), m1 = 1 MJ and R1 = 1 RJ, χ = 100 or τ1 = 10 s cor- responds to a viscous time-scale of ≈ 0.082 yr (or a viscous time- scale of ≈ 0.28 yr for R1 = 1.5 RJ). The simulated orbital period distribution is peaked around 8 Hamers et al. 100 F D P 10−1 10−2 0.0 5 Gyr 10 Gyr tx 0.5 1.0 log10(P1/d) 1.5 2.0 Figure 3. Solid lines: the distributions of the orbital period of the innermost planet at 5 and 10 Gyr, and at a random time (tx). Crosses: observations from Santerne et al. (2016); error bars are indicated with black lines. Open circles: distribution from fig. 23 of Anderson et al. (2016) for Mp = 1 MJ and χ = 100. Distributions are normalized to unit total area. log10(P1/d) ∼ 0.7, or P1 ∼ 5 d. The location of the peak in the simulations is consistent with observations, which show a peak at the same orbital period. Compared to Anderson et al. (2016), who considered high-e migration in stellar binaries, our orbital period distribution is wider and peaked at longer periods (∼ 5 d versus ∼ 2 d). This is likely not only due to the (fundamental) difference in the orbital configuration (an inclined three-body system versus a mildly inclined multiplanet system with three to five planets), but also other parameters such as the viscous time-scale and in partic- ular the planetary radius (cf. Section 4.3.3). Similarly to previous studies of high-e migration in other con- texts (e.g. Petrovich & Tremaine 2016; Antonini et al. 2016), the simulations fail to produce the large observed population of WJs in the region between ∼ 10 and 100 d. 4.3.3 Dependence on the grid parameters In Fig. 3, we combined results from all parameters. Here, we con- sider in more detail the dependence of the results on the parameters individually. In Fig. 4, the innermost orbit semilatus rectum distributions after 10 Gyr (or after a stopping condition was met) are plotted for different slices of the parameter space. Considering tidal evolution only, the final semimajor axis (at the moment of circularisation) is expected to be equal to the semilatus rectum. In each panel, dis- tributions are shown for all parameters combined, except one (dif- ferent line styles). In addition, we distinguish between the different types of systems: no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (light blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). In the top panel, we show the dependence on tV,1. The distri- butions for the non-HJ and non-WJ forming systems are essentially independent of tV,1. HJs and WJs are only formed for viscous time- scales of . 1.4 × 10−2 yr and ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 yr, respectively. The requirement of highly efficient tides for HJ production was also HJ WJ TD Kij < 0 no migration run time exceeded tV,1 ≈ 1.4E − 03 yr tV,1 ≈ 1.4E − 02 yr tV,1 ≈ 1.4E − 01 yr tV,1 ≈ 1.4E + 00 yr Np = 3 Np = 4 Np = 5 β ≈ 8.2 β ≈ 14.6 β ≈ 32.8 R1 = 1.0 RJ R1 = 1.5 RJ 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C F D C F D C F D C 0.0 −3.0 −2.5 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 log10(a1(1 − e2 1)/AU) 0.0 0.5 Figure 4. The innermost orbit semilatus rectum distributions after 10 Gyr (or after a stopping condition was met) plotted for different slices of the parameter space. In each panel, distributions are shown for all parameters combined, except one (different line styles). The varying parameters are tV,1, Np, β and R1 in the top through bottom panels, respectively. Differ- ent types of systems are indicated with different colours: systems with no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (light blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). found for other high-e migration scenarios, in particular in stellar binaries (Petrovich 2015a). The dependence on the number of planets and β is shown in the second and third panels of Fig. 4, respectively. Despite the expected propensity of exciting higher eccentricities with a larger number of planets and/or smaller β, the dependence of the semilatus rectum distributions on these parameters is not markably strong. The dependence on the radius of the innermost planet is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 4. For HJs, the final semilatus rectum is smaller for smaller radii (see e.g. equation 3 of Wu & Lithwick 2011). For the tidally disrupted planets, a larger radius corresponds to a larger tidal disruption radius (cf. equation 6), and therefore a larger semilatus rectum at the moment of disruption. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 9 HJ HJ WJ WJ TD TD Kij < 0 Kij < 0 no migration no migration run time exceeded run time exceeded 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C a1/AU e1 0.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C a2/AU e2 0.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C a3/AU e3 0.0 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Figure 5. The initial distributions of the semimajor axes (left column) and the eccentricities (right column) for the various outcomes of the Monte Carlo simulations. Colours indicate systems with no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (light blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). 4.3.4 Dependence on the initial orbital properties In Fig. 5, we show how the various outcomes in our simulations de- pend on the initial semimajor axes (left column) and the eccentrici- ties (right column), for the three innermost orbits. We recall that the semimajor axes were sampled linearly from fixed ranges, whereas the eccentricities were sampled from a Rayleigh distribution with various widths expressed by β (cf. Section 4.1). The largest differences in the initial semimajor axes between the various outcomes are apparent in the innermost orbit. The dis- tribution of the initial a1 for the HJ and tidal disruption systems is skewed towards small values compared to the other systems, with a1 . 2 AU for most (≈ 0.95 and ≈ 0.8, respectively) of the sys- tems. This can be attributed to two effects. For the typical a2 and a3 in the simulations, a small a1 implies a larger commensurability be- tween the LK time-scales associated with orbit pairs (1,2) and (2,3), MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) F D C F D C F D C F D C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2 4 6 ai/AU 8 10 12 a2, e2; a1 < 1 AU (N = 31) a2, e2; a1 > 1 AU (N = 27) a3, e2; a1 < 1 AU (N = 3) a3, e3; a1 > 1 AU (N = 2) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 ei F D C Figure 6. Observed distributions of the semimajor axes (top panel) and the eccentricities (bottom panel) for planets with m1 sin(i) > 0.1 MJ obtained from the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. We consider multiplanet systems with at least two observed planets, and make a distinction between systems with the innermost observed orbit a1 < 1 AU (solid lines) and a1 > 1 AU (dashed lines). and therefore more likely chaotic evolution and higher eccentrici- ties (e.g. Hamers et al. 2015). Also, the required eccentricities for small pericentre distances (important for tidal dissipation or tidal disruption) are lower for smaller semimajor axes. The systems with exceeded run times (dark red lines) pref- erentially have large a1, whereas a2 is preferentially small. These systems are unlikely to result in HJs (cf. Section 5.1). With regard to the other orbits and outcomes, no strong differences can be dis- cerned in the initial distributions of the semimajor axes. HJ and tidal disruption systems typically show a preference for initially higher values of the eccentricities, notably e2. Other- wise, there is no strong dependence on the initial eccentricities. Observations of companion planets to HJs are currently still strongly limited. In the latest surveys, detections of Jupiter-mass planets are only 100% complete for planets out to ≈ 10 AU (Bryan et al. 2016). In our simulations, except for the innermost two planets, the orbits span a much larger range in semimajor axis. Despite the incompleteness of the observations, we show in Fig. 6 observed distributions of the semimajor axes (top panel) and the eccentricities (bottom panel) for planets with m1 sin(i) > 0.1 MJ obtained from the Open Exoplanet Catalogue (Rein 2012; https://github.com/OpenExoplanetCatalogue). We consider multi- planet systems with at least two observed planets, and make a dis- 10 Hamers et al. HJ HJ WJ WJ TD TD Kij < 0 Kij < 0 no migration no migration run time exceeded run time exceeded 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C not strongly affected in the runs without this stopping condition (cf. Table 3 and Section 4.3.1). There are distinct differences with respect to the AMD be- tween the HJ and tidal disruption systems. Many (≈ 0.7) of the HJs have AMD < 1.5 m1 √a1, whereas for the tidal disruption sys- tems this fraction is markedly lower, ≈ 0.4. The preference for the tidal disruption systems for higher AMDs can be explained by the higher eccentricities reached in the innermost orbit, therefore more likely resulting in the (immediate) tidal disruption of the innermost planet, rather than tidal dissipation, which requires a certain amount of time to dissipate energy and reduce the eccentricity. This implies that there is a 'window' for producing HJs through secular evolu- tion: the AMD should be large enough to excite high eccentricities, but small enough to prevent violent excitation of the eccentricities leading to tidal disruption before tidal dissipation can be effective. 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.5 AMD/(m1√a1) 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.3.5 Mass dependence Figure 7. The initial distributions of the AMD for the various outcomes of the Monte Carlo simulations. Colours indicate systems with no migra- tion (black), HJs (light red), WJs (light blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), orbit crossings (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). The black vertical dotted line indicated AMD = m1 √a1. tinction between systems with the innermost observed orbit a1 < 1 AU (solid lines) and a1 > 1 AU (dashed lines). Some difference can be seen in the distributions of a2 for the two populations with a1 < 1 AU and a1 > 1 AU: a2 tends to be smaller for the former population. This trend is not reflected in our simulations (cf. the second row of Fig. 5). With regard to a3, there seems to be a large difference in the distribution of a3 for the two populations. How- ever, our observational sample only includes five systems with at least three planets, so with this low number of systems this differ- ence cannot be considered significant. Another, more theoretically oriented, quantity is the angular- momentum deficit (AMD). The AMD is defined as AMD = Np Xi=1 mi √ai(cid:20)1 − q1 − e2 i cos(ivar,i)(cid:21) , (7) where ivar,i is the inclination with respect to the invariable plane, i.e. the plane perpendicular to the total orbital angular-momentum vec- tor of the system. In terms of the AMD, high eccentricities and/or chaotic motion can be achieved if AMD & m1 √a1 (Wu & Lithwick 2011; Lithwick & Wu 2011, 2014). In our simulations, there is indeed a strong dependence on the AMD. In Fig. 7, we show the initial distributions of the AMD for the various outcomes. Of the non-migrating systems (black line), nearly all (≈ 0.99) have an AMD which is < m1 √a1. In contrast, virtually all tidally disrupted systems (yellow line) have an AMD & m1 √a1, and the HJ systems (light red line) have an AMD & 0.8 m1 √a1, with the majority (∼ 0.8) of systems having AMD > m1 √a1. The systems in which Ki j ≤ 0 occurred (dark blue line) have higher AMD compared to the non-migrating systems, which can be attributed to the higher eccentricities attained with higher AMDs, therefore more likely leading to Ki j ≤ 0. Nonetheless, ≈ 0.75 of these systems have < m1 √a1, indicating that the majority of sys- tems with Ki j ≤ 0 would not have produced HJs or tidally dis- rupted planets if the stopping condition at Ki j ≤ 0 had not been imposed. This is consistent with the result that the HJ fractions are The orbits of lower-mass planets carry less orbital angular mo- mentum compared to higher-mass counterparts, making the former more susceptible to angular-momentum exchanges with orbits of other planets. Therefore, secular eccentricity excitation is expected to be more pronounced if the outer planets are more massive than the innermost planet. In our simulations, we assumed a flat distri- bution of the planetary masses between 0.5 and 5 MJ. In the top panels of Fig. 8, we show the distributions of the mass of the innermost planet for the various outcomes in the sim- ulations. For the non-migrating systems, the mass distribution is consistent with a flat distribution, reflecting the initial distribution, and showing no mass preference. HJ and tidal disruption systems show different mass distributions. For the latter groups, there is a preference for lower-mass planets, with m1 . 1 MJ for ∼ 0.4 and ∼ 0.5 of the systems, respectively. There are few HJs and tidal dis- ruption systems with m1 & 2 MJ. This implies a clear quantitative prediction for high-e migration in multiplanet systems, and which was given qualitatively in Wu & Lithwick (2011): the HJ should have a typical (median) mass of ∼ 1 MJ, and not be more massive than ∼ 2 MJ. Observations show a deficit of massive HJs (Zucker & Mazeh 2002; Udry & Santos 2007), which seems consistent with the above prediction. More quantitatively, the observed mass distributions of planets with m1 sin(i) > 0.1 MJ (obtained from the Open Exoplanet Catalogue) are shown in the bottom panels of Fig. 8. We made a distinction between discovery method (RV or transit) and semima- jor axis (a1 < 0.1 AU and a1 > 1 AU). The planets from the RV observations within 0.1 AU are typically of lower mass compared to planets at > 1 AU. This trend is consistent with the predictions as described above. However, one should be cautious when ascribing the observed mass difference to secular evolution alone, given that the latter unlikely produces all HJs, and the observed mass distri- bution is also likely affected by other processes, such as primordial 'mass segregation', whereas in the simulations we assumed an ini- tially flat distribution. Moreover, the RV observations are biased, because planets at > 1 AU are more easily detected if they are more massive. 4.3.6 HJ formation times As mentioned in Section 1, secular evolution in multiplanet sys- tems typically occurs on long time-scales of the order of Gyr, im- plying that HJs formed through this mechanism could have been MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 11 HJ HJ WJ WJ TD TD Kij < 0 Kij < 0 no migration no migration run time exceeded run time exceeded HJ HJ WJ WJ TD TD Kij < 0 Kij < 0 no migration no migration run time exceeded run time exceeded F D C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.0 F D P 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2 4 6 t/Gyr 0.0 10 8 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2 4 6 t/Gyr 0.0 10 8 1 2 3 4 5 m1/MJ 0.0 −6 −5 −4 −2 −3 log10(t/Gyr) −1 0 1 F D C F D P 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C F D P Figure 9. The final times associated with the various outcomes in our pop- ulation synthesis (with all parameters combined). For systems in which a stopping condition occurred, these final times are the age of the system when the integration was stopped. In the case of HJs (light red lines), these times are the times of HJ formation. Different types of systems are indicated with different colours: systems with no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). The same data, shown using linear scales on the abscissa, are shown in the insets. Red open circles and yellow crosses: data for HJs and tidal disruptions, respectively, from the second panel of fig. 22 (Mp = 1 MJ) of Anderson et al. (2016). stopped. In the case of HJs (light red lines), these times are the times of HJ formation, as defined in Section 4.2. The HJs in our simulations are indeed formed late, with a median formation time of ≈ 1 Gyr, and with a fraction ≈ 0.1 of the HJs formed after ≈ 6 Gyr. These times are much longer com- pared to times associated with high-e migration due to close en- counters (Rasio & Ford 1996; Chatterjee et al. 2008; Ford & Rasio 2008; Juri´c & Tremaine 2008), and somewhat longer compared to those typically found for high-e migration in stellar binaries (Anderson et al. 2016; cf. the red open circles in Fig. 9). In contrast, tidal disruptions occur much earlier, with ≈ 0.85 of the disruptions occurring before 1 Gyr. We note that the peak around 100 Myr in the HJ formation times arises from the systems with the shortest viscous time-scale of ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 yr. 4.3.7 Stellar obliquity In Fig. 10, we show, for all grid parameters combined, the distri- butions after 10 Gyr (or after a stopping condition) of the stellar obliquity, i.e. the angle between the stellar spin and the orbit of the innermost planet. In the simulations, spin-orbit coupling was in- cluded taking into account the spin directions of both the star and the innermost planet (cf. Section 2.3). Initially, the stellar spin and RV; a1 < 0.1 AU (N = 29) RV; a1 > 1 AU (N = 314) transit; a1 < 0.1 AU (N = 160) transit; a1 > 1 AU (N = 5) 0.0 0 1 3 2 m1 sin(i)/MJ 4 5 Figure 8. Top panels: distributions of the initial mass of the innermost planet for the Monte Carlo simulations with all grid parameters combined. Different types of systems are indicated with different colours: systems with no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or exceeding of run time (dark red). Bottom panels: the observed mass distributions of planets with m1 sin(i) > 0.1 MJ (obtained from the Open Exoplanet Catalogue). Two discovery methods are included: RV (red) and transit (blue). Also, a dis- tinction is made between the semimajor axis: a1 < 0.1 AU (solid lines) and a1 > 1 AU (dashed lines). deposited at their current orbit at late stages in the MS lifetime of the host star. In Fig. 9, we show the 'final' times associated with the various outcomes in our population synthesis (with all parameters combined). For systems in which a stopping condition occurred, these final times are the age of the system when the integration was MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) 12 Hamers et al. HJ HJ WJ WJ TD TD Kij < 0 Kij < 0 no migration no migration run time exceeded run time exceeded 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F D C 0.05 0.04 F D P 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 50 100 θ⋆ (deg) 150 Figure 10. Distributions after 10 Gyr (or after a stopping condition) of the stellar obliquity θ⋆ for the Monte Carlo simulations with all grid parame- ters combined. As in Fig. 4, different types of systems are indicated with different colours: systems with no migration (black), HJs (light red), WJs (blue), tidally disrupted inner planets (yellow), Ki j ≤ 0 (dark blue) or ex- ceeding of run time (dark red). Open circles: distribution from fig. 24 of Anderson et al. (2016) for Mp = 1 MJ and χ = 100. Crosses: observed projected obliquity distribution, adopted from Lithwick & Wu (2014). Note that observed (i.e. projected) obliquities are shifted to lower angles relative to the intrinsic obliquities. The PDFs are normalized to unit total area. innermost orbit were assumed to be aligned, i.e. zero obliquity was assumed (cf. Table 1). For high-e migration scenarios with three bodies (or, more generally, LK cycles with tidal friction), it has been well estab- lished that the obliquity for HJs should be clustered around 40◦ and 130◦ (Fabrycky & Tremaine 2007; Naoz & Fabrycky 2014; Anderson et al. 2016). This can be explained intuitively by not- ing that during LK cycles, the eccentricity maxima occur at mutual inclinations of ≈ 40◦ or 130◦, and mutual inclination tends to be 'locked' after the onset of strong tidal dissipation (this is assum- ing that the stellar spin vector itself does not change due to spin- planet orbit coupling; see Storch et al. 2014; Storch & Lai 2015; Anderson et al. 2016). Observations have revealed a range of obliq- uities, depending on the stellar surface temperature (e.g. Winn et al. 2011; Mazeh et al. 2015). In our simulations, we find that the obliquity distributions of the HJs and tidally disrupted planets are distinct from non- migrating systems. The obliquities of the former are broadly dis- tributed between ∼ 0◦ and ∼ 140◦, with a preference for obliquities around 30◦ and 60◦ for HJs, and 50◦ for tidal disruption systems. In contrast, the observed HJ obliquity distribution peaks around 20◦ (cf. the black crosses in Fig. 10). There is no clear peak around 130◦, as found e.g. by Anderson et al. (2016), who considered high-e migration in stellar binaries (cf. the black open circles in Fig. 10). This can be attributed to the fact that in our simulations, the planets were always initially prograde, and there is no expected characteristic symmetric inclina- tion for secular evolution in multiplanet systems. Nevertheless, we still find that ∼ 0.1 of the HJs systems have retrograde obliquities. 5 DISCUSSION 5.1 Uncertainties in the secular integrations Here, we discuss uncertainties associated with the stopping condi- tion Ki j ≤ 0 and premature terminations of the integrations because the run time exceeded our maximum set value (cf. Section 4.2). A comparison of the HJ fractions between runs with and with- out the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition enabled in Table 3 shows that disabling the stopping condition results in different fractions. Typ- ically, the fraction increases, which can be understood by noting that systems in which Ki j ≤ 0 occurs are likely to produce high eccentricities in the inner orbit, and therefore HJs. Nonetheless, the fractions remain small, not reaching values larger than 0.007 (com- pared to the largest fraction of 0.004 for the simulations in Table 3 with the Ki j ≤ 0 stopping condition enabled), indicating that the result of small HJ fractions is robust. Nevertheless, it remains un- clear how the results would be affected if N-body integrations were used, which evidently do not suffer from limitations associated with small or negative Ki j. This important aspect should be investigated in future work. The fraction of systems in which the run time was exceeded is typically less than 0.01 (cf. Tables 2 and 3). These systems show a strong preference for large initial a1, typically a1 ∼ 3.5 AU, and small a2, typically a2 ∼ 6.5 AU (cf. Fig. 5). This implies short secu- lar time-scales in the innermost orbit. Consequently, the number of oscillations within the time-span of 10 Gyr is very large, requiring much computation time and thus hitting our set limit of 12 CPU hours. Also, the number of systems in which the run time was ex- ceeded typically increases with β. For large β, the initial eccentrici- ties and inclinations are small, implying relatively weak secular ex- citation. This is also reflected by the AMD -- systems in which the run time was exceeded typically have small AMD, AMD . m1 √a1 (cf. Fig. 7). Also, m1 tends to be large, typically m1 ∼ 4 MJ (cf. Fig. 8). The HJ systems, on the other hand, are associated with a1 . 2 AU and no strong preference for a2 (cf. Fig. 5), a small β, large AMD & m1 √a1 (cf. Fig. 7), and m1 . 2 MJ. This suggests that the HJ fractions would likely not be very different if the stopping condition (v) had not been imposed. In addition, we also carried out a subset of simulations with a shorter maximum CPU run time of 4 hours. We found that decreas- ing the maximum CPU time increases the fraction frun time exceeded and decreases fno migration, whereas fHJ is not strongly affected. 5.2 HJ fraction and comparisons to other variants of high-e migration In our population synthesis simulations, the highest intrinsic HJ fraction obtained was 0.023, assuming tV,1 ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 yr. This corresponds to 1000 times more efficient tides compared to tV,1 ≈ 1.4 yr, which would circularize a HJ at 5 d in less than 10 Gyr (Socrates et al. 2012). For most other parameter combinations with non-zero fractions, the fractions are between ∼ 0.001 and ∼ 0.01. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) Secular evolution and HJs in multiplanet systems 13 For the purposes of this section, we adopt a fraction fHJ,multi,sim = 0.01, taking into account that this fraction can be higher by a fac- tor of at most a few if tidal dissipation in the innermost planet is extremely effective (tV,1 . 1.4 × 10−2 yr). Assuming a giant planet occurrence rate around MS stars of fGP = 0.1 and an optimistic multiplanet fraction of 1, we find a HJ fraction around MS stars of fHJ,multi = fHJ,multi,sim fGP = 0.001. In contrast, the observed HJ fraction is fHJ,obs ∼ 0.01 (e.g. Wright et al. 2012), an order of magnitude larger. We emphasize that higher HJ fractions would be obtained in simulations with even smaller values of tV,1 (i.e. even more efficient tides), and/or larger planetary radii R1. Also, we (necessarily) made assumptions about the orbital configurations (most importantly the semimajor axes, eccentricities and inclinations), which also affect the simulated HJ fractions. Our adopted simulated HJ fraction of ∼ 0.01 is similar or slightly lower compared to studies of high-e migration in two- planet or stellar binary systems. Anderson et al. (2016) find a frac- tion of fHJ,bin,sim ∼ 0.03 for high-e migration in stellar binaries. In Petrovich & Tremaine (2016), the two-planet case is considered, and fHJ,two−p,sim = 0.051 is found for tV,1 = 1.4 yr. The high fraction in the latter paper may be due to higher assumed initial inclinations and more compact systems (smaller a2/a1) compared to our sim- ulations. The two-planet case is also considered by Antonini et al. (2016), who find fHJ,two−p,sim = 0.01 for tV,1 = 1.4 yr. 5.3 Effects of disc evolution In young stellar systems (age . 10 Myr), a gas disc is still present and this affects the orbital evolution of the planets (e.g. Matsumura et al. 2010). In the simulations of Section 3, the HJ for- mation time was typically . 10 Myr (cf. Fig. 2), suggesting that the effects of a dissipating gas disc should have been taken into account. We emphasize that the purpose of the simulations in Sec- tion 3 was to test the SecularMultiple algorithm from a compu- tational point of view, focusing only on the gravitational dynam- ics and tidal evolution. The initial conditions might not be realistic, given the large assumed initial eccentricities and inclinations (rang- ing between ∼ 0.4 and ∼ 0.6). We consider the initial conditions to be more realistic in Section 4, in which smaller initial inclinations and eccentricities were assumed. In that section, the HJ formation times are much longer, i.e. at least ∼ 100 Myr (cf. Fig. 9), and there- fore the effects of a dissipating gas disc are likely not important. 5.4 HJs, hot Neptunes and super-Earths from tidally downsized HJs Depending on the parameters, the fraction of tidally disrupted plan- ets in our simulations can be large, typically a few times larger compared to the HJ fraction (cf. Table 2). We adopted the tidal disruption threshold from Guillochon et al. (2011), who assumed coreless planets. In Liu et al. (2013), it was found that during close encounters with their host star, Jupiter-like planets with massive cores (order 10 Earth masses) can retain part of their envelope. Con- sequently, the planet would not be completely tidally disrupted, but transformed into a low-mass HJ, a hot Neptune or a super-Earth, depending on the amount of mass lost. When related to our simulations, this suggests that there could be a significant contribution to low-mass HJs, hot Neptunes or (short-period) super-Earths driven by secular evolution in multi- planet systems. This does require that the original planet was not MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016) too massive (. 2 MJ, cf. the yellow lines in Fig. 8), and the typi- cal formation time of the tidally downsized planet is expected to be much shorter compared to that of HJs formed through tidal evolu- tion (cf. Fig. 9). 6 CONCLUSIONS We have studied the orbital migration of Jupiter-like planets in- duced by secular interactions in multiplanet systems (three to five planets), resulting in HJs. In this variant of high-e migration, the eccentricity of the orbit of the innermost planet is excited to high values on secular time-scales (order Gyr). Combined with tidal dis- sipation, which is highly effective for high eccentricities, this can produce a Jupiter-like planet in a tight orbit. Our conclusions are as follows. 1. For a set of three-planet systems we have shown that the secular code SecularMultiple (Hamers & Portegies Zwart 2016) produces results that are statistically consistent with those of more accurate direct N-body integrations (Section 3). 2. We carried out a population synthesis study of multiplanet sys- tems with SecularMultiple, taking into account tidal dissipation in the innermost planet and the central star (Section 4). We found HJ fractions of at most 0.023, assuming tV,1 ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 yr. This corresponds to 1000 times more efficient tides compared to tV,1 ≈ 1.4 yr, for which a HJ at 5 d would circularize in less than 10 Gyr (Socrates et al. 2012). For relatively weak tidal dissipation (tV,1 & 1.4 × 10−2 yr), we found no HJs. Larger fractions would be obtained for even lower values of the innermost planet viscous time-scale (stronger tides), i.e. tV,1 . 1.4×10−3 yr. The HJ fractions are similar or lower compared to other variants of high-e migration, but this comparison depends strongly on the system parameters, such as the initial semimajor axes, eccentricities, inclinations, the viscous time-scales and the radius of the innermost planet. 3. In the population synthesis, we found that the fraction of systems in which the innermost planet is tidally disrupted is typically a few times larger compared to the HJ fraction. The large proportion of tidally disrupted planets to HJs can be explained qualitatively by noting that the eccentricity of the innermost orbit can be violently excited in multiplanet systems, implying that the planet is rapidly tidally disrupted before tidal dissipation is able to shrink and circu- larize the orbit. The large fraction of tidal disruptions in some of our simulations suggests that tidal disruptions in multiplanet systems, even if not extremely compact, could be common. For non-compact planetary systems, this suggests a possible difference in metallicity between stars with two or fewer planets, compared to stars with three or more planets. 4. The orbital period distribution of the HJs in our simulations is strongly peaked around ∼ 5 d, which coincides with the peak in the observed orbital period distribution of gas giant planets. The location of the peak is affected by the assumed tidal dissipation ef- ficiency and the planetary radius. In our simulations, HJs with the longest periods correspond to an inflated planet with radius R1 = 1.5 RJ. No significant number of planets was found in the simula- tions with orbital periods in the 'period valley' between 10 and 100 d, whereas observations show a significant population of planets in this regime, i.e. WJs. It is unlikely that WJs are produced through secular evolution in multiplanet systems, unless tidal dissipation is extremely efficient. Other high-e migration scenarios also fail to produce WJs in the observed proportion (Petrovich & Tremaine 14 Hamers et al. 2016; Antonini et al. 2016). Alternative candidates for the origin of WJs are in situ formation or disc migration. 5. Our simulated HJs and tidally disrupted planets are preferentially not massive, i.e. m1 . 2 MJ, with a median value of ≈ 1 MJ (cf. Section 4.3.5), which is similar to observations. The stellar obliq- uity distribution is fairly uniform between ∼ 0◦ and ∼ 140◦ with some preference for obliquities around 30◦ and 60◦. There is no clear peak at ∼ 130◦, as opposed to high-e migration in stellar bi- nary or two-planet systems (cf. Section 4.3.7). Approximately 0.1 of the HJs have retrograde obliquities. 6. Another characteristic of HJs formed in our simulations relevant for observations is the late formation time of up to ∼ 10 Gyr (cf. Section 4.3.6). This is in stark contrast to disc migration, for which formation is expected to occur within the first few Myr. Also, this characteristic can potentially distinguish between other variants of high-e migration, which typically predict shorter formation times. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the anonymous referee for providing helpful and con- structive comments. This work was supported by the Nether- lands Research Council NWO (grants #639.073.803 [VICI], #614.061.608 [AMUSE] and #612.071.305 [LGM]) and the Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA). We ac- knowledge the use of the astric computer cluster of the national Israeli astrophysics I-CORE centre. HBP acknowledges support from European union career integration grant 'GRAND', the Min- erva centre for life under extreme planetary conditions and the Is- rael science foundation excellence centre I-CORE grant 1829. YL acknowledges NSF grants AST-1109776 and AST-1352369 and NASA grant NNX14AD21G. References Anderson K. R., Storch N. I., Lai D., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3671 Antonini F., Hamers A. S., Lithwick Y., 2016, AJ, 152, 174 Batygin K., Bodenheimer P. H., Laughlin G. P., 2016, ApJ, 829, 114 Beaugé C., Nesvorný D., 2012, ApJ, 751, 119 Bodenheimer P., Hubickyj O., Lissauer J. J., 2000, Icarus, 143, 2 Bryan M. L., et al., 2016, ApJ, 821, 89 Chatterjee S., Ford E. B., Matsumura S., Rasio F. A., 2008, ApJ, 686, 580 Eggleton P. P., Kiseleva L. G., Hut P., 1998, ApJ, 499, 853 Fabrycky D., Tremaine S., 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298 Ford E. B., Rasio F. A., 2008, ApJ, 686, 621 Goldreich P., Tremaine S., 1980, ApJ, 241, 425 Guillochon J., Ramirez-Ruiz E., Lin D., 2011, ApJ, 732, 74 Hamers A. S., Portegies Zwart S. F., 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2827 Hamers A. S., Perets H. B., Antonini F., Portegies Zwart S. F., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4221 Harrington R. S., 1968, AJ, 73, 190 Juri´c M., Tremaine S., 2008, ApJ, 686, 603 Knutson H. A., et al., 2014, ApJ, 785, 126 Kolmogorov A., 1933, G. Ist. Ital. Attuari, 4, 83 Kozai Y., 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Laskar J., Gastineau M., 2009, Nature, 459, 817 Laughlin G., Crismani M., Adams F. C., 2011, ApJ, 729, L7 Lee E. J., Chiang E., Ormel C. W., 2014, ApJ, 797, 95 Lidov M. L., 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719 Lin D. N. C., Papaloizou J., 1986, ApJ, 309, 846 Lin D. N. C., Bodenheimer P., Richardson D. C., 1996, Nature, 380, 606 Lithwick Y., Wu Y., 2011, ApJ, 739, 31 Lithwick Y., Wu Y., 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111, 12610 Liu S.-F., Guillochon J., Lin D. N. C., Ramirez-Ruiz E., 2013, ApJ, 762, 37 Matsumura S., Thommes E. W., Chatterjee S., Rasio F. A., 2010, ApJ, 714, 194 Mazeh T., Perets H. B., McQuillan A., Goldstein E. S., 2015, ApJ, 801, 3 Mikkola S., Merritt D., 2008, AJ, 135, 2398 Naoz S., Fabrycky D. C., 2014, ApJ, 793, 137 Naoz S., Farr W. M., Rasio F. A., 2012, ApJ, 754, L36 Naoz S., Farr W. M., Lithwick Y., Rasio F. A., Teyssandier J., 2013a, MNRAS, 431, 2155 Naoz S., Kocsis B., Loeb A., Yunes N., 2013b, ApJ, 773, 187 Ngo H., et al., 2015, ApJ, 800, 138 Ogilvie G. I., Lin D. N. C., 2007, ApJ, 661, 1180 Pelupessy F. I., van Elteren A., de Vries N., McMillan S. L. W., Drost N., Portegies Zwart S. F., 2013, A&A, 557, A84 Petrovich C., 2015a, ApJ, 799, 27 Petrovich C., 2015b, ApJ, 805, 75 Petrovich C., Tremaine S., 2016, ApJ, 829, 132 Portegies Zwart S., McMillan S. L. W., van Elteren E., Pelupessy I., de Vries N., 2013, Computer Physics Communications, 183, 456 Rasio F. A., Ford E. B., 1996, Science, 274, 954 Rein H., 2012, preprint, (arXiv:1211.7121) Santerne A., et al., 2016, A&A, 587, A64 Smirnov N., 1948, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 279 Socrates A., Katz B., 2012, preprint, (arXiv:1209.5723) Socrates A., Katz B., Dong S., 2012, preprint, (arXiv:1209.5724) Storch N. I., Lai D., 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1821 Storch N. I., Anderson K. R., Lai D., 2014, Science, 345, 1317 Tanaka H., Takeuchi T., Ward W. R., 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257 Udry S., Santos N. C., 2007, ARA&A, 45, 397 Winn J. N., et al., 2011, AJ, 141, 63 Wright J. T., Marcy G. W., Howard A. W., Johnson J. A., Morton T. D., Fischer D. A., 2012, ApJ, 753, 160 Wu Y., Lithwick Y., 2011, ApJ, 735, 109 Wu Y., Murray N., 2003, ApJ, 589, 605 Zucker S., Mazeh T., 2002, ApJ, 568, L113 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 14 (2016)
1710.07482	1	1710	2017-10-20T10:51:04	How alien can alien worlds be?	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	In an attempt to select stars that can host planets with characteristics similar to our own, we selected seven solar-type stars known to host planets in the habitable zone and for which spectroscopic stellar parameters are available. For these stars we estimated 'empirical' abundances of O, C, Mg and Si, which in turn we used to derive the iron and water mass fraction of the planet building blocks with the use of the model presented in Santos et al. (2015). Our results show that if rocky planets orbit these stars they might have significantly different compositions between themselves and different from that of our Earth. However, for a meaningful comparison between the compositional properties of exoplanets in the habitable zone and our own planet, a far more sophisticated analysis (e.g. Dorn et al., 2017) of a large number of systems with precise mass and radius of planets, and accurate chemical abundances of the host stars. The work presented here is merely the first humble step in this direction.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	EWASS Special Session 4 (2017): Star-planet interactions Edited by Emeline Bolmont & Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma www.emelinebolmont.com www.blancocuaresma.com/s/ 7 1 0 2 t c O 0 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 2 8 4 7 0 . 0 1 7 1 : v i X r a How alien can alien worlds be? V. Adibekyan,1 P. Figueira,1 N. C. Santos1,2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 2 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal Abstract In an attempt to select stars that can host planets with characteristics similar to our own, we selected seven solar-type stars known to host planets in the habitable zone and for which spectroscopic stellar parameters are available. For these stars we estimated 'empirical' abundances of O, C, Mg and Si, which in turn we used to derive the iron and water mass fraction of the planet building blocks with the use of the model presented in Santos et al. (2015). Our results show that if rocky planets orbit these stars they might have significantly different compositions between themselves and different from that of our Earth. However, for a meaningful comparison between the compositional properties of exoplanets in the habitable zone and our own planet, a far more sophisticated analysis (e.g. Dorn et al., 2017) of a large number of systems with precise mass and radius of planets, and accurate chemical abundances of the host stars. The work presented here is merely the first humble step in this direction. 1 Introduction Observations revealed a now well-known dependence be- tween exoplanet formation and metallicity. Giant plan- ets tend to form more frequently around metalic stars (e.g. Gonzalez, 1997; Santos et al., 2001; Mortier et al., 2013). This dependence, however, is less clear for low-mass/small-size planets (e.g. Sousa et al., 2011; Buchhave & Latham, 2015; Zhu et al., 2016). Interestingly, there are no planets ob- served around very metal poor stars e.g. [Fe/H] < -1 dex (exoplanet.eu), which probably means that there is a crit- ical metallicity below which no planet can be formed (e.g. Johnson & Li, 2012). This critical metallicity is much higher than the metallicity of population III stars in our Galaxy, leading to the inference that planet formation started only after the first stars were formed and died, enriching the the interstellar gas with metals. However, this process did not take very long (in astronomical timescale) since many planets are found around thick disk stars that are typically older than 8 Gyr (e.g. Haywood et al., 2013). Moreover, it was shown that planet formation was more efficient around thick disk stars when compared to the thick disk stars of the same (low)metallicity (Haywood, 2009; Adibekyan et al., 2012a,b). This stems from the thick disk stars being en- hanced in α-elements such as O, Mg, Si (e.g. Bensby et al., 2003; Adibekyan et al., 2013a) which seems to compensate the lack of iron, typically used as a proxy of overall metal- licity Adibekyan et al. (2012a). Indeed a system of five sub- earth-size planets was detected around a 11.2 Gyr old star (Campante et al., 2015), setting the limit for the earliest exo- planet system formed and opening a possibility for the exis- tence of ancient life in our Galaxy. During (at least) the 11.2 billion year-long history of exo- planet formation in the Milky Way, the interstellar gas has chemically evolved significantly. Some recent works de- tail how abundances of different chemical elements changes with time (e.g. Nissen et al., 2017; Delgado Mena et al., 2017a) and place in the Galaxy (e.g. Recio-Blanco et al., 2014; Kordopatis et al., 2015). Abundances of these different individual heavy elements and specific elemental ratios (e.g. Mg/Si and Fe/Si) are, in turn, very important for the formation (Santos et al., 2001; Suárez-Andrés et al., 2017; Santos et al., 2017; Adibekyan et al., 2015, 2017), orbital architecture (Adibekyan et al., 2013b; Beaugé & Nesvorný, 2013; Mulders et al., 2016), structure and composition (Santos et al., 2015; Thiabaud et al., 2014; Dorn et al., 2015), and even maybe for the exoplanets (Adibekyan et al., 2016). This discussion leads to a conclu- sion that the chemical environment i.e., time and place in the Milky Way, play a crucial role for the formation of plan- ets and their main characteristics (Adibekyan, 2017). 'habitability' of In a recent work, Adibekyan et al. (2016) proposed that planets in the habitable zone of solar-like stars may have dif- ferent compositions from that of our Earth. In this work, we try to estimate the composition of the planet building blocks around stars that are known to host planets in the habitable zone (HZ)1. 2 Planets in the habitable zone: sample se- lection To select stars with HZ planets we used the the Habit- able Exzoplanet Catalog2. From the list of "Conservative" and "Optimistic Sample of Potentially Habitable Exoplanets" we selected planets that are hosted by solar-type stars with effective temperature higher than 4500 K. We note that the derivation of stellar parameters, including stellar metallicity, is very challenging for cooler stars and are typically less pre- cise. For six (Kepler-1540, Kepler-1544, Kepler-1552, Kepler- 1090, Kepler-1606 and Kepler-1638) out of 13 selected sys- 1Do not mix with the Habeertable Zone defined in Turbo-King et al. (2017). 2http://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog 1 Table 1: Stellar parameters and abundances of the sample stars. The index emp refer to the 'empirical' derivation of the abundances. The references for stellar parameters are in the last column. star Teff log g [Fe/H] [O/H] [C/H] [Mg/H] [Si/H] [O/H]emp [C/H]emp [Mg/H]emp [Si/H]emp References Adibekyan et al. 5518±44 4.44±0.06 -0.29±0.06 -0.19±0.05 -0.24±0.05 -0.23±0.03 -0.24±0.02 -0.10±0.10 -0.28±0.06 -0.18±0.06 -0.21±0.05 Borucki et al. (2012) 4774±77 4.42±0.16 -0.36±0.02 -0.36±0.10 -0.20±0.09 -0.19±0.08 -0.14±0.10 -0.40±0.05 -0.22±0.03 -0.27±0.05 Tsantaki et al. (2013) 5310±17 4.46±0.03 -0.52±0.01 -0.26±0.10 -0.52±0.10 -0.30±0.06 -0.36±0.01 -0.18±0.10 -0.52±0.10 -0.29±0.08 -0.35±0.07 Sousa et al. (2008) Kepler-22 HD40307 HD10700 Kepler-452 5757±85 4.32±0.09 0.21±0.09 Kepler-62 4925±70 4.68±0.04 -0.37±0.04 Kepler-174 4880±126 4.68±0.15 -0.43±0.10 Kepler-443 4723±100 4.62±0.10 -0.01±0.10 tems, the stellar metallicity (the most important parameter for the current study) was derived by Morton et al. (2016) using the vespa3 package. The non-spectroscopic metallic- ities of these six stars seem to be too biased (probably be- cause of the fitting priors and algorithm) towards the solar value. The mean metallicity and the standard deviation of the six stars is 0.000±0.058 dex. In fact, about 80% of the stars from the full sample of Morton et al. (2016) have metallicities from -0.1 to 0.1 dex. For comparison, only about 34% of stars from the volume-limited HARPS sample of Adibekyan et al. (2012c) lie within the aforementioned range of metallicity. Without making any judgment on the quality of this work, but nonetheless noting the clear discrepancy, we preferred to confine our analysis to spectroscopicly derived parame- ters. As such, we limited our analysis to seven stars (Kepler- 22, HD40307, HD10700, Kepler-452, Kepler-62, Kepler-174, Kepler-443) with metallicities only derived by spectroscopic methods (see Table 1). It is interesting to see that six out of seven hosts have sub-solar metallicities, although the metal- licity of Kepler-443 is compatible with the solar value within the error. 3 Abundances of the host stars the sample stars was not very productive. In order to derive composition of the planetary build- ing blocks, as it was done in Santos et al. (2015) chem- ical abundances of O, C, Mg, and Si are necessary. Our intensive literature search for chemical abundances of Only three stars have elemental abundances reported in the literature: Kepler-22 – (Schuler et al., 2015), HD40307 – (Delgado Mena et al., 2017b; Suárez-Andrés et al., 2017), and HD10700 – (Bertran de Lis et al., 2015; Delgado Mena et al., 2017b; Suárez-Andrés et al., 2017). To obtain the 'empiri- cal' abundances of other stars we proceed as follows. We first searched for stellar analogs4 for each star in these catalogs: Suárez-Andrés et al. (2017) for Carbon abundance and Delgado Mena et al. (2017b) for abundances of Mg and Si. The mean abundance of all the analogs was used as a proxy for the 'empirical' abundance for a given star, and the standard deviation (star-to-star scatter) of the abundances was used as an error of the empirical' abundance. Oxygen abundance was derived from the empirical formula between [O/H] and [Fe/H] provided in Suárez-Andrés et al. (2017) which is based on the Bertran de Lis et al. (2015) data. Orig- inal and 'empirical' abundances of the stars are presented in 3https://github.com/timothydmorton/vespa 4We defined stellar analogs as stars with [Fe/H]±0.1 dex, Teff ±500K, and logg±0.3 dex. 2 0.21±0.10 0.17±0.08 0.22±0.08 0.21±0.08 Jenkins et al. (2015) -0.14±0.10 -0.39±0.05 -0.21±0.05 -0.22±0.06 Borucki et al. (2013) -0.18±0.10 -0.59±0.10 -0.41±0.01 -0.40±0.04 Rowe et al. (2014) 0.02±0.10 -0.11±0.09 -0.07±0.10 0.06±0.07 Torres et al. (2015) the Table 1. As can be seen from the table, the difference be- tween 'empirical' and original abundances can be as large as 0.1 dex. Thus we stress that the 'empirical' abundances should be considered only as rough estimates. 4 Composition of the planet building blocks The model presented in Santos et al. (2015) uses atomic abundances of O, C, Mg, Si and Fe, as input, and with simple stoichometric equations calculates the mass fraction of H2O, CH4, Fe, MgSiO3, Mg2SiO4, the total mass percentage of all heavy elements (Z), the iron mass fraction (firon = mF e/(mF e + mM gSiO3 + mM g2SiO4 ) and the water mass fraction (wf = mH2O/(mH2O + mF e + mM gSiO3 + mM g2SiO4 )). These values are derived for each star using the original spectro- scopic and 'empirical' abundances. The results are presented in Table 2. From the table we can see that for the three stars for which together with the 'empirical' abundances spectro- scopic abundances are available (HD40307, HD10700, and Kepler-22), the derived values are similar and agree within the error bars. However, it should be mention the the uncer- tainties of some of the parameters are large, especially if they are derived from the 'empirical' abundances. 5 Results and Discussion Our results summarized in Table 2 show that if small-size and low-mass planets are found in the HZ of the studied seven stars then they are expected to have significantly dif- ferent iron-to-silicate and water mass fractions. In particu- lar, the iron mass fraction in five out of seven cases is signifi- cantly lower (from ∼24 to ∼28%) than what this model would predict for solar-system planet building blocks i.e. firon = 33% Santos et al. (2017, submitted). Water content would also vary from system to system between ∼56 to 72%. Here we should stress again the large uncertainties for this parameter that mostly come from the larger errors on the C and O abun- dances. Note that the model predicts a wf = 60% which is compatible with the value of ∼67% derived in Lodders (2003). (2017, submitted) compiled chemical abundances for large sample of solar-type stars from the solar vicinity and derived the expected composition of the planet building blocks. The authors found that stars belonging to different galactic stellar populations (thin disk, thick disk, halo, and high-α metal-rich - Adibekyan et al. (2011)) are expected to have rocky planets with significantly different iron mass and water mass fractions. Our results go well in line with the findings of Santos et al. (2017, submit- ted), since stars in our small sample having different metal- licities and ages probably belong to different galactic popu- Very recently, Santos et al. Zenodo, 2017 EWASS Special Session 4 (2017): Star-planet interactions Table 2: Mass fractions and total fraction (Z) of heavy elements, iron mass fraction among refractory species (firon), and the water mass fraction (wf ). All values are in %. star HD40307emp HD40307 HD10700emp HD10700 Kepler-22emp Kepler-22 Kepler-62emp Kepler-174emp Kepler-443emp Kepler-452emp H2O 0.39±0.11 0.38±0.11 0.37±0.11 0.38±0.10 0.45±0.13 0.33±0.04 0.40±0.10 0.39±0.11 0.56±0.14 0.82±0.21 CH4 0.15±0.01 0.15±0.03 0.11±0.03 0.12±0.03 0.20±0.02 0.20±0.02 0.15±0.02 0.10±0.02 0.29±0.05 0.55±0.10 Fe 0.06±0.00 0.06±0.00 0.04±0.00 0.04±0.00 0.07±0.01 0.08±0.01 0.06±0.01 0.04±0.01 0.13±0.03 0.21±0.05 MgSiO3 0.08±0.03 0.10±0.06 0.06±0.05 0.06±0.02 0.10±0.05 0.10±0.02 0.11±0.04 0.08±0.01 0.23±0.04 0.28±0.15 Mg2SiO4 0.07±0.02 0.07±0.07 0.07±0.05 0.06±0.03 0.08±0.05 0.07±0.02 0.06±0.03 0.03±0.01 0.02±0.05 0.15±0.15 Z 0.74±0.12 0.76±0.12 0.65±0.11 0.66±0.10 0.90±0.14 0.78±0.05 0.76±0.10 0.63±0.11 1.25±0.16 2.02±0.25 firon 27.89±1.72 25.10±2.82 23.80±2.51 24.36±1.36 29.85±3.24 30.64±2.90 25.88±2.53 26.86±4.68 32.70±6.00 32.73±5.84 wf 65.00±11.58 62.30±14.35 68.52±13.08 70.37±10.63 64.29±14.83 56.90±5.00 63.49±11.22 72.22±11.14 59.57±15.68 56.16±30.27 lations. The results also somehow confirm the prediction of Adibekyan et al. (2016) that exoplanets in the HZ may have composition different from that of our Earth. Adibekyan, V., Gonçalves da Silva, H. M., Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Delgado Mena, E., et al. 2017, Astrophysics, 60, 325. Adibekyan, V., Santos, N. C., Figueira, P., Dorn, C., Sousa, 6 A laconic conclusion We estimated the water and iron-to-silicate mass fraction of planet building blocks for seven solar-type stars with pre- cise spectroscopic metallicities that are known to have plan- ets in the HZ. Our, very simplified analysis show that if rocky planets are found orbiting around these stars they might have different composition when compared with our own planet. To confidently answer to the question postulated in the ti- tle of this manuscript a far more sophisticated analysis for each individual object is needed with an important require- ment of having very precise masses and radius of the planets and very accurate chemical abundances of the host star (e.g. Dorn et al., 2017). Acknowledgments V.A. thanks the organizers of EWASS Special Session 4 (2017), Emeline Bolmont & Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma, for a very interesting session and for selecting his oral contribu- tion. This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through national funds (ref. PTDC/FIS- AST/7073/2014 and ref. PTDC/FIS-AST/1526/2014) through national funds and by FEDER through COMPETE2020 (ref. POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016880 and ref. POCI-01-0145- FEDER-016886). V.A., P.F., and N.C.S. also acknowledge the support from FCT through Investigador FCT contracts of reference IF/00650/2015/CP1273/CT0001, IF/01037/2013/ CP1191/CT0001, and IF/00169/2012/CP0150/CT0002, re- spectively, and POPH/FSE (EC) by FEDER funding through the program "Programa Operacional de Factores de Com- petitividade - COMPETE". PF further acknowledges support from FCT in the form of an exploratory project of reference IF/01037/2013CP1191/CT0001. References Adibekyan, V. 2017, In Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con- ference Series, edited by A. M. Mickaelian, H. A. Harutyu- nian, & E. H. Nikoghosyan, Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific Conference Series, vol. 511, p. 70. Adibekyan, V., Figueira, P., & Santos, N. C. 2016, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 46, 351. S. G., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, L2. Adibekyan, V. Z., Delgado Mena, E., Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., et al. 2012a, A&A, 547, A36. Adibekyan, V. Z., Figueira, P., Santos, N. C., Hakobyan, A. A., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2013a, A&A, 554, A44. Adibekyan, V. Z., Figueira, P., Santos, N. C., Mortier, A., Mor- dasini, C., et al. 2013b, A&A, 560, A51. Adibekyan, V. Z., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., & Israelian, G. 2011, A&A, 535, L11. Adibekyan, V. Z., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S. G., Israelian, G., Delgado Mena, E., et al. 2012b, A&A, 543, A89. Adibekyan, V. Z., Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Delgado Mena, E., González Hernández, J. I., et al. 2012c, A&A, 545, A32. Beaugé, C. & Nesvorný, D. 2013, ApJ, 763, 12. Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Lundström, I. 2003, A&A, 410, 527. Bertran de Lis, S., Delgado Mena, E., Adibekyan, V. Z., Santos, N. C., & Sousa, S. G. 2015, A&A, 576, A89. Borucki, W. J., Agol, E., Fressin, F., Kaltenegger, L., Rowe, J., et al. 2013, Science, 340, 587. Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Batalha, N., Bryson, S. T., Rowe, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 120. Buchhave, L. A. & Latham, D. W. 2015, ApJ, 808, 187. Campante, T. L., Barclay, T., Swift, J. J., Huber, D., Adibekyan, V. Z., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 170. Delgado Mena, E., Tsantaki, M., Adibekyan, V. Z., Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., et al. 2017a, [arXiv:1707.05156]. Delgado Mena, E., Tsantaki, M., Adibekyan, V. Z., Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., et al. 2017b, [arXiv:1705.04349]. Dorn, C., Hinkel, N. R., & Venturini, J. 2017, A&A, 597, A38. Dorn, C., Khan, A., Heng, K., Connolly, J. A. D., Alibert, Y., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A83. Gonzalez, G. 1997, Mon Not R Astron Soc, 285, 403. Haywood, M. 2009, ApJL, 698, L1. Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Katz, D., & Gómez, A. 2013, A&A, 560, A109. Jenkins, J. M., Twicken, J. D., Batalha, N. M., Caldwell, D. A., Cochran, W. D., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 56. Johnson, J. L. & Li, H. 2012, ApJ, 751, 81. Kordopatis, G., Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G., Recio-Blanco, A., de Laverny, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A122. Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220. Mortier, A., Santos, N. C., Sousa, S., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A112. Zenodo, 2017 3 Adibekyan et al. Morton, T. D., Bryson, S. T., Coughlin, J. L., Rowe, J. F., Ravichandran, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 86. Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Frasca, A., & Molenda- Żakowicz, J. 2016, AJ, 152, 187. Nissen, P. E., Silva Aguirre, V., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Collet, R., Grundahl, F., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. Recio-Blanco, A., de Laverny, P., Kordopatis, G., Helmi, A., Hill, V., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A5. Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Marcy, G. W., Lissauer, J. J., Jontof- Hutter, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 45. Santos, N. C., Adibekyan, V., Figueira, P., Andreasen, D. T., Barros, S. C. C., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A30. Santos, N. C., Adibekyan, V., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., Delgado-Mena, E., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, L13. Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2001, Astron Astro- phys, 373, 1019. Schuler, S. C., Vaz, Z. A., Katime Santrich, O. J., Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 5. Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., & Udry, S. 2011, Astron Astrophys, 533, A141. Sousa, S. G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., Udry, S., Casagrande, L., et al. 2008, A&A, 487, 373. Suárez-Andrés, L., Israelian, G., González Hernández, J. I., Adibekyan, V. Z., Delgado Mena, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A96. Thiabaud, A., Marboeuf, U., Alibert, Y., Cabral, N., Leya, I., et al. 2014, Astron Astrophys, 562, A27. Torres, G., Kipping, D. M., Fressin, F., Caldwell, D. A., Twicken, J. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 99. Tsantaki, M., Sousa, S. G., Adibekyan, V. Z., Santos, N. C., Mortier, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A150. Turbo-King, M., Tang, B. R., Habeertable, Z., Chouffe, M. C., Exquisit, B., et al. 2017, [arXiv:1703.10803]. Zhu, W., Wang, J., & Huang, C. 2016, ApJ, 832, 196. 4 Zenodo, 2017
1801.05341	1	1801	2018-01-16T16:35:07	Atmospheric Beacons of Life from Exoplanets Around G and K Stars	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The current explosion in detection and characterization of thousands of extrasolar planets from the Kepler mission, the Hubble Space Telescope, and large ground-based telescopes opens a new era in searches for Earth-analog exoplanets with conditions suitable for sustaining life. As more Earth-sized exoplanets are detected in the near future, we will soon have an opportunity to identify habitable worlds. Which atmospheric biosignature gases from habitable planets can be detected with our current capabilities? The detection of the common biosignatures from nitrogen-oxygen rich terrestrial-type exoplanets including molecular oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) requires days of integration time with largest space telescopes, and thus are very challenging for current instruments. In this paper we propose to use the powerful emission from rotational-vibrational bands of nitric oxide, hydroxyl and molecular oxygen as signatures of nitrogen, oxygen, and water rich atmospheres of terrestrial type exoplanets highlighted by the magnetic activity from young G and K main-sequence stars. The signals from these fundamental chemical prerequisites of life we call atmospheric beacons of life create a unique opportunity to perform direct imaging observations of Earth-sized exoplanets with high signal-to-noise and low spectral resolution with the upcoming NASA missions.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	OPEN Atmospheric Beacons of Life from Exoplanets Around G and K Stars Received: 7 April 2017 Accepted: 6 October 2017 Published: xx xx xxxx Vladimir S. Airapetian1,2, Charles H. Jackman1, Martin Mlynczak2, William Danchi1 & Linda Hunt3,4 The current explosion in detection and characterization of thousands of extrasolar planets from the Kepler mission, the Hubble Space Telescope, and large ground-based telescopes opens a new era in searches for Earth-analog exoplanets with conditions suitable for sustaining life. As more Earth-sized exoplanets are detected in the near future, we will soon have an opportunity to identify habitale worlds. Which atmospheric biosignature gases from habitable planets can be detected with our current capabilities? The detection of the common biosignatures from nitrogen-oxygen rich terrestrial-type exoplanets including molecular oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) requires days of integration time with largest space telescopes, and thus are very challenging for current instruments. In this paper we propose to use the powerful emission from rotational-vibrational bands of nitric oxide, hydroxyl and molecular oxygen as signatures of nitrogen, oxygen, and water rich atmospheres of terrestrial type exoplanets "highlighted" by the magnetic activity from young G and K main-sequence stars. The signals from these fundamental chemical prerequisites of life we call atmospheric "beacons of life" create a unique opportunity to perform direct imaging observations of Earth-sized exoplanets with high signal-to-noise and low spectral resolution with the upcoming NASA missions. Detection of signatures of life from remote exoplanetary systems is the ultimate goal of astrobiology. The signs of life known as "biosignatures" can potentially be retrieved through the impact of exoplanetary biospheres on atmospheric chemistry. The current methodologies for detecting observable signatures of life in terrestrial-type planets are based on the presence of chemical compounds that are out of chemical equilibrium due to the com- plex biochemistry of life1,2. Signatures of life should meet the criteria of reliability, survivability and detectability and can be identified with remote-sensing detection of the most common molecules in the Earth's troposphere, including molecular oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4), surface reflectance signatures or polarized scattering in exoplanetary atmospheres3–6. The pres- ence of abundant atmospheric molecular oxygen may be a strong indicator of oxygenic photosynthesis, together with methane, the marker of biological decay, and other molecules suggest that the atmosphere is in chemical disequilibrium driven by biological activity2–4. However, abiotic production of molecular oxygen can be driven by the photolysis of CO2, H2O and other oxygen-bearing gases via UV and particle collisions in scenarios of terrestrial-type exoplanets around K, G or M dwarf stars3,7–9 and could mimic a biologically driven oxygen pro- duction. Given this mechanism, the expected O2 production for various scenarios is over 3 orders of magnitude smaller than that observed in current Earth8. The situation for very dry (water-depleted) CO2 atmospheres of exoplanets around M dwarf stars is different; in this case O2 can be produced abiotically at the level of Earth-like oxygen abundance9. Thus, the absence of water signatures in reflectance and emission spectra can serve as a potential indicator of the abiotic nature of atmospheric O2. In water-rich exoplanetary atmospheres, photolysis of atmospheric water vapor can also produce an accumulation of oxygen due to the thermal escape of hydrogen under some scenarios for exoplanets around active stars10. However, the production and accumulation of oxy- gen could be prevented for terrestrial exoplanets located in the highly compact habitable zones around active M dwarfs. Stellar activity from these host stars can create intense X-ray and Extreme-UV (XUV) emission and magnetized winds, which are the major factors contributing to the non-thermal ionospheric escape of oxygen ions (along with hydrogen)11. In general, the abundance of atmospheric molecular oxygen can vary in response of the planetary environ- ments influenced by the fraction of land mass versus ocean mass, volcanic and tectonic activity and the efficiency 1NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USA. 2American University, Washington, DC, USA. 3NASA/LARC, Hampton, VA, USA. 4SSAI, Hampton, VA, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to V.S.A. (email: vladimir. [email protected]) 1 Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4www.nature.com/scientificreportsof atmospheric escape mediated by the activity from the host star11–13. Abiotic production of another important biosignature gas, methane, is not an efficient process as compared to its biological origin due to bacteria and biological decay processes, thus making its presence together with molecular oxygen a strong biosignature14. However, the current biological production of methane in the Earth's troposphere and stratosphere is mostly due to anthropogenic sources and is ~1.8 ppmv. The major biosignature gases from an Earth-like "living" planet around a Sun-like star are difficult to detect with current telescopes and require long exposures with high spec- tral, high contrast, and high spatial resolution coronographic instruments on ground-based telescopes such as the Giant-Magellan Telescope (GMT), the Ten Meter Telescope (TMT), the European Extremely Large Telescope E-ELT, and space-based telescopes such as the Habitable Explorere (HabEx), the Large UV Optical and Infrared (LUVOIR), and the Origins Space Telescope (OST)15,16. In this paper we propose that strong non-thermal emission from broad molecular bands in the near- and mid-infrared (mid-IR) referred to as "beacons of life" can be emitted by molecular products of nitrogen- and oxygen-rich exoplanetary atmospheres with high (a large fraction of 1 bar) atmospheric pressures. These include stellar activity driven emission from nitric oxide, hydroxyl and oxygen molecules as the strongest signals that may be observable from the habitable worlds. Results Atmospheric "Beacons of Life" from Earth. Life as we know it requires, but is not limited to, a nitro- gen-rich atmosphere with the presence of abundant free oxygen produced by photosynthesis and the presence of liquid water. Molecular nitrogen (N2) is the dominant gas in the Earth's atmosphere, because of its geochemical stability. The high abundance of atmospheric N2 was critical for the initiation of life on the early Earth, because fixation of nitrogen is required to create linkages of long chained molecules including proteins and base pairs of RNA and DNA7,17. Nitric oxide (NO) and hydroxyl (OH) are efficiently produced in the thermosphere as a result of photo-dissociation (X-ray and EUV) and collisional dissociation (via precipitating electrons) of molecular nitrogen and water vapor (see R1-R* in METHODS). The abundance of NO during quiet times (no geomagnetic storms) varies within a few ppbv and increases by a factor of 100 during strong geomagnetic storms induced by coronal mass ejections from the Sun18,19. The abundances of NO, OH and O2 are traced by observations of time-varying emission from molecular bands of NO at 5.3-µm, OH at 1.6 and 2 µm and O2 (1Δ) at 1.27 µm. NO emission from the 5.3-µm band is created by a large number of vibration-rotation transitions excited by inelas- tic collisions with atomic and molecular oxygen19,20 and exothermic reactions. Observations made over the last 15 years with the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument aboard NASA's TIMED (Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics Dynamics) satellite have revealed that the emitting power of NO is strongly correlated with the solar activity cycle traced by the solar radio flux at 10.7 cm, the indicator of solar activity as well as the indices that trace the strength of Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) induced geomagnetic storms. The total power emitted by thermospheric nitric oxide at 5.3 µm and carbon dioxide at 15 µm varies within ~100 GW reaching ~2 TW during strong geomagnetic storms comparable to the one that occurred on Oct 28–31, 2003. The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) observations reveal an increase of NO abundance by a factor of 10 at the height range of 6–68 km during large Oct–Nov 2003 geomagnetic storm reaching a concentration over 300 ppbv at high lattitudes20. This caused the enhancement of the NO emission power by a factor of 20–30 in the mid-IR bands as compared to the atmospheric state during the quiet Sun at solar minimum21. The drastic enhancement of NO caused the depletion of ozone by up to 60% during the Oct - Nov 2003 storm as observed at high lattitudes at 50–60 km20. The radiative power increase during geomagnetic storms is attributed to the enhancement of production of NO molecules and increased kinetic temperature. Infrared NO radiative cooling plays the role of an efficient thermostat by cooling the thermosphere in response to the radiative and non-radiative heating associated with space weather events22,23. NO radiative cooling becomes sharply enhanced (more than a factor of 10) due to the increased energy input into the ionosphere-thermosphere (IT) system of polar cap regions during geomagnetic storms. The non-radiative heating is introduced by resistive dissipation of ionospheric currents (Joule heating, JH) in response to the perturbation of the global magnetosphere caused by CME events, ion-neutral collisions and particle precipitation in the polar regions of the planet. If most of the energy entering the IT system is radi- ated away in the form of NO and CO2 emission, then we can expect that its power should increase proportionally with the input energy flux. The XUV flare emission at wavelengths between 1–70 Å is another crucial source of production of low-latitude thermospheric NO driven by photoelectrons formed via photoionization of atmos- pheric species23. The emission in OH bands (1.6 & 2 µm) observed by SABER has the total power of ~0.2 TW, which is weakly dependent on the solar cycle (see Fig. 1). Figure 2 presents the flux evolution of O2 (1Δ) emission flux at 1.27 µm during 2004 to 2008, which shows variations of emission power between zero (at night, increasing substantially in daytime due to O3 photolysis via UV solar radiation) to 230 TW. Beacons of Life from Exoplanets Around Active Stars. Recent Kepler Space Telescope and Hubble Space Telescope data suggest that magnetically active main-sequence stars of K, G and M spectral types generate high XUV fluxes from magnetically driven flares with energies over 10 times greater than that of the current Sun24,25. As a result of the energy input, the Earth's thermosphere responds with enhanced radiative cooling from the molecular bands of NO at 5.3 µm, CO2 at 15 µm as well as conductive cooling. Using scaling of NO emission power at 5.3 µm with the F10.7 flux, the proxy for the solar XUV flux, and Ap index, the measure of the geomag- netic activity, we can expect the enhancement of NO emission by over one order of magnitude20. Low mass stars including K and M dwarfs are known to remain magnetically active and exhibit high XUV fluxes (over 10 times higher than that of the current Sun) over 2–3 Gyr. For example, XUV fluxes from "mature" 4–6 Gyr-old K and M main-sequence stars are by a factor of 10 greater than that of the Sun at the inner edge of 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4Figure 1. Total emission power (in units of 0.1 TW): upper panel: OH (9→7 + 8→6) at 2 μm; lower panel: OH (5→3 + 4→2) power at 1.6 μm. Figure 2. The daily averages of the total emitting power (in units of 0.1 TW) by the Earth as a dot from O2(1Δ) at 1.27 μm. their respective habitable zones26. This flux is comparable to the XUV flux from the young 0.7 Gyr-old Sun7. This persistent stellar magnetic activity may have a profound effect on the dynamics and chemistry of the early Earth and potential atmospheres of exoplanets around K-M stars7,11. Clues to the history of the atmospheric chemistry of the early Earth, specifically its oxygen abundance, come from geological (rock) records suggesting that our planet's atmosphere was weakly oxidizing with less than 0.001% of O2 during the first half of our planet history including the time when life started on Earth. Only ~2.4 Gyr ago our atmosphere acquired appreciable concen- tration of free oxygen. This puzzling increase of O2 is known as Great Oxidation Event (GOE)27. The GOE time scale is comparable or shorter than the magnetic evolution time scale for low mass cool stars. Can stellar activity control the onset of the GOE on terrestrial-type exoplanets? Oxygenated atmospheres of terrestrial type exoplan- ets can be created by several factors including atmospheric escape, surface gravity, and the magnetic activity of its host star. One of the factors causing the accumulation of atmospheric oxygen in the troposphere at ~2.4 Gyr ago could be XUV-driven photolysis of the carbon dioxide the low pressure (~0.25 bar) early Earth atmosphere 3 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4Figure 3. 2D map of steady state NO mixing ratio (in ppbv): Left: Model B output, Middle: Model C output and Right: Model D output; Contour level: 0.1, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, & 2000 ppbv. Figure 4. 2D map of steady state OH mixing ratio (in ppbv): Model B (left panel), Model C (middle panel) and Model D (right panel); Contour level: 0.1, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 ppbv. depleted due to XUV driven escape of oxygen and nitrogen ions11,28. This may suggest that the active low mass stars with greater XUV fluxes can induce comparable atmospheric erosion at shorter time scale causing O2 accu- mulation earlier in the history of a terrestrial type exoplanet. Thus, in many scenarios terrestrial type exoplanets with N2 – rich oxygenated atmospheres can be exposed to high energy fluxes from their host stars. XUV emission and energetic particles can be efficient in photodissociation of the atmospheric molecular nitrogen, carbon diox- ide and water vapor resulted in production of nitric oxide and hydroxyl molecules7,20,21. How would space weather from active stars in the form of XUV radiation and SEP particle fluxes affect the amount of NO and OH emission in the mid-IR bands that would be expected from oxygen-rich terrestrial-type exoplanets around active G, K and M stars? To investigate the atmospheric chemistry changes owing to CME driven solar energetic particles (SEPs), we expose an Earth-like oxygen-rich atmposphere to the energy fluxes expected from active G, K and M main-sequence stars. We computed a grid of 5 atmospheric chemistry models of an Earth twin to numerically study the chemical evolution of nitrogen oxides, NOx (N, NO, NO2) HOx (H, OH and HO2) constituents and ozone in response to various fluxes of energetic protons during SEPs in the strat- osphere and themosphere. For this purpose, we used the two-dimensional photochemical transport Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) atmospheric model that calculates the constituents in the upper stratosphere (35 km) extending to the upper mesosphere (95 km) (see METHODS). Our study includes the base model (base Model A, no SEP and the current XUV flux, F0), Model B (no SEP and XUV flux at 10F0), Model C (July 2000 SEP event and XUV flux at 10F0), Model D (10 × July 2000 SEP event and XUV flux at 10F0), Model E (20 × July 2000 SEP event and XUV flux at 10F0). We used the maximum daily average particle input for the SEP event, which occurred on July 15, 2000, that was associated with the fast (1800 km/s) halo CME and the Bastille Day × 5.7 solar flare29. Our simulations suggest that at the atmospheric height range between 0 to 95 km, the enhanced XUV flux from the Sun is not efficient in the production of odd nitrogen, and thus only modest changes in NO mixing ratio are observed. Model B (no SEP and the active Sun at 10F0) shows NO values of typically 1 ppbv at 80–90 km (the left panel of Fig. 3), which are similar to those computed for base Model A. The steady state energy flux in the form of energetic protons from 1–300 MeV with the energy spectrum and intensity characteristic of the July 2000 SEP event (Model C, see also Methods) produces a mixing ratio for NO that is enhanced by a factor of 200 (or 200 ppbv at the reference height of 85 km) in the polar cap regions (the middle panel of Fig. 3) with respect to the quiet conditions described by Model B. Model D suggests that NO net production increases approximately linearly in response to the enhancement of the intensity of the proton flux by a factor of 10 with respect to Model C, and reaches 2 ppmv (the right panel of Fig. 3). These fluxes are consistent with the results of 1D atmospheric models applied for SEP driven atmospheric chemistry of exoplanets around M dwarfs30. Such large concentra- tions of NO from an oxygen-rich atmosphere are by a factor of 10–30 greater than than modeled in the abiotic atmosphere of the early Earth7. Thus, the false positives do not appear to be important production of NO as an atmospheric "beacon" of life. Model E results show that this trend continues as we increase the proton flux by 4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4Figure 5. The 2D map of atmospheric ozone destruction driven by XUV flux from an active star and a 10xJuly 2000 SEP event (right panel, Model D) with respect to the base model (left panel; Model A). another factor of 2. Thus, we conclude that the net production of NO is scaled approximately linearly with the incident proton flux. This could be understood, because 70 to 80% of the energy of incoming protons goes into creation of ionization pair production. Neutral and ion chemistry resulting from ion pair production creates about 1.25 N atoms and about 2 HOx molecules for each incident proton, and the N atoms produced are in the ground state N(4 S) (45% per ion pair) or the excited state N(2D) (55% per ion pair)31. The increase in the NO concentration by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude is driven by the corresponding flux of precipitating protons produced by CME initiated shocks and associated secondary electrons. Each SEP associ- ated CME event exerts a dynamic pressure on the planetary magnetosphere, which perturbs the geomagnetic field and induces geomagnetic currents in the polar regions. The resistive dissipation of these currents heats the ionosphere. The height integrated Joule heating (JH) rate introduced by such currents varies from a few mW/ m2 (for a regular CME event with the energy of 1031 ergs) to up to 1 W/m2 for a super Carrington event with the energy of 2 × 1033 ergs7,32. The JH rate increased by 2 orders of magnitude should be balanced by the radiative and conductive cooling rates. The radiative cooling rates are mostly controlled by greater emission flux from NO molecules due to enhanced production of NO due to SEP mediated dissociation. The generation of large amounts of NO has been shown in Earth's atmosphere to lead to "overcooling" events33. That is, so much NO is generated that the resultant infrared cooling leaves the atmosphere colder than it was before the geomagnetic event. NO emission at 5.3 µm is driven by collisional impact with atomic oxygen, and therefore, is dependent on thermo- spheric abundance of O. The models show no significant change in production of atomic oxygen due to XUV flare emission from the active star (at 10F0) at altitudes below 70 km (Model B). The proton events contribute to the modest (20–40%) destruction of O in the thermosphere. However, the NO emission flux at 5.3 µm depends on the temperature of neutral oxygen, Tn, as ~exp (−2700/Tn), because the increase in neutral temperature increases the rate of collisional excitation of NO, while reduction of O plays a secondary role in the production of NO emission flux34. The neutral temperature increase is caused by the enhaced Joule heating deposited in the thermosphere during geomagnetic storms, and thus mostly contributes to the rise in NO emission power. The O2 signal is proportional to J [O3], where J is the ozone photolysis rate, and the symbol [O3] represents the abundance of O3. The ozone abundance also depends on more O2 photolysis (see R11 of METHODS), it is inversely dependent on temperature, and also on the H, NO, NO2, and other chemical abundances (see R13 of METHODS). Figure 5 presents the 2D map of atmospheric ozone destruction driven by XUV flux from an active star and a 10xJuly 2000 SEP event (right panel, Model D) with respect to the base model (left panel; Model A). The Models C and D show that ozone is destroyed up to 70% in the mid latitudes and up to 90% at latitudes over 60°. This is caused by both ozone photolysisand collisional dissociation with energetic particles and enhanced production of NO. The NO radiative cooling is sentitive to the temperature of neutral oxygen as discussed above, and thus, the rapid cooling cuts off the infrared emission – this is a manifestation of the "thermostat" effect dis- cussed above. More detailed modeling of the response of Earth-like planets is required to understand whether NO emission would be prolonged after storms or rather would be short-lived due to overcooling. The same linear scaling is observed for the increase of steady state resultant mixing ratios of production of HOx (H, OH and HO2) due to dissociation of water vapor via the incoming flux of SEP protons. Figure 4 shows the 2D maps of the OH mixing ratios for the models B, C and D (as in Fig. 3). One can see that the mixing ratio for Model C increases to 100 ppbv at the reference height. As discussed in reference35, most of the OH produced is the vibrationally excited hydroxyl molecule; thus the expected power emitted by the 1.6 µm and 2.0 µm bands should increase accordingly by the same factor if a sufficient amount of ozone is available for its production. We point out that understanding the response of the upper atmosphere of a planet to strong CMEs is still a frontier of research even for the Earth. The current Decadal Survey [http://nap.edu/13060] for Solar and Space Physics identifies this topic as a Key Science Goal for Earth's thermosphere and ionosphere. Discussion Our results imply that the total NO emitting flux at 5.3 µm from the planet around an active K to G star (Models C and D) with an N-O2 rich atmosphere is expected to be ~1020–1022 erg/s. This is consistent with the estimate of the NO power at 5.3 µm during higher stellar activity expected from younger G and K type stars obtained from 5 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4the linear scaling between X-ray flux (0.1–0.8 nm) GOES measurements with F10.7 flux obtained in18 extended to F10.7 = 2000. The contribution of the false positive of emitted flux is less than the NO production rate by over 3-4 orders of magnitude, because the emission of NO is mediated by the collsions of atomic O that is strongly sup- pressed in the abiotic atmosphere8. We should note that our model does not account for the thermospheric tem- perature caused by the energy inputs due to XUV emission and JH, and thus, represents a low bound of expected NO emission fluxes at 5.3 µm from nitrogen- and oxygen rich atmospheres of exoplanets around active stars. The emission power from OH bands −2 × 1018–1020 ergs/s and O2 at 1.27 µm at least at the level of 2 × 1021 ergs/s. For a planetary system located at 10 pc away from Earth, this implies the total flux at the Earth integrated over the NO band with the bandwidth of ~5600 Å at 10−20–10−18 ergs/cm2/s, the OH bands with the bandwidth of ~2000 Å at 2 × 10−22–10−20 erg/cm2/s and O2 band over the spectral width of 431 Å at ~2 × 10−19 ergs/cm2/s. This suggests that low spectral resolution λ/Δλ = 10–40 would be required to detect emission from these bands. Low spectral resolution (λ/Δλ~20) observations at a signal-to-noise of 10 will require only 1.5 hours of exposure time with the JWST/MIRI spectrograph at ~5 µm. Thus, if future space telescopes have apertures larger than JWST by a factor of 2, the exposure time could be reduced by a factor of 4 and the planets with the 10 times lower NO flux can be detected in just 4 hours. Because the emission flux from NO, OH and O2 (1Δ) bands are dependent on stellar activity levels driven by geomagnetic storms & XUV flux, it is expected to vary by a factor of 10 to 100 depending on the level of stellar activity on a time scale of storms, or ~2–3 days. This variability time scale should be greater than the expected exposure time. The estimated number of prime Earth twin targets around G-K stars in the neighborhood of 10 pc for the detection of the beacons of life is at least ~20 planets36,37. Conclusion Based on our analysis of TIMED/SABER data collected from observations of Earth's thermospheric emission in the mid-IR bands and 2D models of atmospheric chemistry of terrestrial type planets around active stars, we conclude that the molecular-band emission from NO at 5.3 µm, OH at 1.66 and 2 µm and O2 at 1.27 µm is strongly correlated with the level of stellar activity in the form of stellar energetic particle events. The high emission fluxes from these molecules in the mid-IR bands would signify a nitrogen-rich, oxygen rich and water rich atmosphere with the atmospheric pressure (significant fraction of 1 bar), which represent the fundamental requirements for habitability referred to as atmospheric "beacons of life". Our models suggest that ozone in the atmospheres of habitable exoplanets with high NO and OH fluxes should significantly depleted at all lattitudes via reactions with NOx and OHx species (see Fig. 5). Although the raw signal itself from NO is observable as noted above, however, its size is small compared to the thermal emission from the exoplanet, which is ~102 larger, and much smaller than the emission from the host star, which can be ~106 greater for a star similar to the Sun. Thus, a possible observational strategy available in the near term, using JWST, would be to perform eclipse spectroscopy, where thermal emission from the exoplanet is observed38,39. Potential targets could be found by TESS and then observed with JWST. Ideally the host star would be known to be active, and, if possible, observed close in time by optical or UV observatories to correlate the eclipse observations with recent activity. The proposed time-varying "atmospheric beacons of life" can be observed using direct imaging techniques in the mid IR bands via recently proposed "Exo-Life Beacon Space Telescope", an extended version of FKSI space interferometer39,40. Methods 2-D GSFC Atmospheric Model. We employed the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) two-dimensional (2-D) atmospheric model to study the impact of solar protons on the Earth atmospheric chemistry41,42. The ver- tical range of the model is equally spaced in log pressure and extends from the ground to approximately 92 km (0.0024 hPa) with a 1 km grid spacing and 4 degree latitude grid spacing. The transport is computed off-line and is derived using the daily average global winds and temperatures from the NASA Modern Era Retrospective- analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) meteorological analysis (see the website: http://gmao.gsfc.nasa. gov/research/merra/) for 1979–2012. Thirty-day running averages of the residual circulation, eddy diffusion, zonal mean wind, and zonal mean temperature are computed using the methodology described in43 and are used as input into the GSFC 2-D model. The ground boundary conditions in the GSFC 2-D model for the source gases are taken from WMO (2011) for year 2000. The model uses a chemical solver described in43–45. The photochemical gas and heterogeneous reaction rates and photolysis cross sections have been updated to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory recommen- dations from year 2010 for these computations46. We use the solar proton flux (energies 1 to 300 MeV) for the July 14-16, 2000 SEP event provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) for the NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) (see http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpmenu/lists/ particle.html). The GOES 13 data are considered to be the most reliable of the current GOES datasets for the proton fluxes depositing energy into polar latitudes and were used as the source of protons in several energy intervals for the July 2000 SEP event (see also at http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa. gov/istp/events/2000july14/20000716_proton.gif). Peak ionization rates above 10000 cm−3 s−1 and the energy deposition rate of 5 × 10−7 ergs/cm3/s were reached on July 15, 2000. The proton flux data were used to compute the ion pair production profiles employing the energy deposition methodology discussed in46, where the creation of one ion pair was assumed to require 35 eV. The SEP-produced hourly average ionization rates and the energy deposition rates in the polar cap regions ( > 60 geomagnetic lat- itude) are given in Figs 6 and 7, respectively, for July 14–16 of 2000 SEP event. The GOES proton flux during the July 14–16 of 2000 event as well as the impact on the atmosphere is discussed in47. We use the daily average ionization rates for July 15, 2000 (the maximum energy deposition day of this SEP event) in the computations shown in the paper. 6 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4Figure 6. Ionization rates (in units of # cm−3 s−1) for July 2000 SPE event. Figure 7. Energy deposition (in units of 10−9 ergs cm−3 s−1) for July 2000 SPE. This model referred to as Model A serves as the reference model for calculation of atmospheric chemistry for Model B with 10x enhanced XUV flux and Models C, D, and E for 1x, 10x, and 20x of the particles fluxes, respectively. Production and Destruction of NO and OH. Production and destruction of NO and OH species are driven by the following reactions N 2 − + → e 4 N S 2 ( ) + − e hv Other possibilities from this interaction are N 2 + → 4 N S ( ) + N D 2 ( ) N 2 − + → e 4 N S ( ) + N D 2 ( ) + − e as well as other products, see9,10. The dominant sources of NO production are 4 N S ( ) + → O 2 3 NO O P ( + ) N D 2 ( ) + → O 2 3 NO O P ( + ), and destruction through (R1) (R2) (R3) (R4) (R5) 7 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4(R6) (R4) and (R5) are the major sources of production of NO that becomes vibrationally excited by impacts with atomic oxygen in the ionosphere-thermosphere (IT), and thus are temperature dependent. The hydroxyl produc- tion is controlled by photolysis of water and collisional dissociation → + + . NO 4 N S ( ) N 2 3 O P ( ) + H O Ion + 2 → + + H OH Ion + H O 3 + → OH O + . 2 Destruction of Thermospheric Ozone. Ozone production comes from the following reactions followed by O 2 <+ hv ( 242 nm ) → + O O O O M O M + → + + 2 3 Ozone destruction is mediated via the following reactions nm ) 255 hv + < ( O 3 → + O 2 O followed by Catalytic destruction of ozone is driven by the following reactions O O 3 + → + O 2 O 2 O 3 + → X XO O X O NO OH BrorCl + = , , , ( 2 ) O XO + → + X O 2 O 2 X is not destroyed but continuously participates in the cycle. Net O O 3 + → + : O 2 (R7) (R8) (R9) (R10) (R11) (R12) (R13) (R14) (R15) Data availability statement. Observational data on OH and O2 emission fluxes are available from TIMED/SABER mission at https://gcmd.nasa.gov/records/GCMD_TIMED_SABER.html. The 2D GSFC atmos- pheric model data are available at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. The results of simulations are available upon request from the corresponding author. References 1. Seagar, S. Exoplanet habitability. Science 340, 577–581 (2013). 2. Lovelock, J. E. Thermodynamics and the recognition of alien biospheres. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 189, 167–180 (1975). 3. Meadows, V. S., Reinhard, C. T., Arney, G. N. & 13 co-authors. Exoplanet biosignatures: Understanding oxygen as a biosignature in the context of its environment. submitted to Astrobiology, eprint arXiv:1705.07560 (2017). 4. Kaltenegger, L., Traub, W. A. & Jucks, K. W. Spectral evolution of an Earth-like planet. ApJ 658, 598–616 (2007). 5. Seager, S., Bains, W. & Petkowski, J. J. Toward a list of molecules as potential biosignature gases for the search for life on exoplanets and applications to terrestrial biochemistry. Astrobiology 16, 465–485 (2016). 6. Berdyugina, S. V. Polarized scattering and biosignatures in exoplanetary atmospheres. JQSRT, accepted, eprint arXiv:1607.06874 7. Airapetian, V. et al. Prebiotic chemistry and atmospheric warming of early Earth by an active young Sun. Nature Geoscience 9, (2016). 452–455 (2016). 8. Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Segura, A., Claire, M. W., Robinson, T. D. & Meadows, V. S. Abiotic ozone and oxygen in atmospheres similar to prebiotic Earth. ApJ 792, 90–105 (2014). 9. Gao, P., Hu, R., Robinson, T. D., Li, C. & Yung, Y. L. Stability of CO2 atmospheres on dessicated M dwarf exoplanets. ApJ 806, 1–12 (2015). Astrobiology 15, 119–143 (2015). 10. Luger, R. & Barnes, R. Extreme water loss and abiotic O2 buildup on planets throughout the habitable zones of M dwarfs. 11. Airapetian, V. S. et al. How hospitable are space weather affected habitable zones? The Role of ion escape. ApJ Let 836, L3–L8 (2017). 12. Reinhard, C. T., Olson, S. L., Schwieterman & Lyons, T. W. False negatives for remote life detection on ocean-bearing planets: Lessons from the early Earth. Astrobiology 17, 287–297 (2017). 13. Dong, C. et al. Atmospheric escape from the TRAPPIST-1 planets and implications for habitability. submitted to PNAS, eprint arXiv:1705.05535 (2017). 550–559 (2013). neighbors. A&A 576, A59–A68 (2015). 14. Guzmán-Marmolejo, A., Segura, A. & Escobar-Briones, E. Abiotic production of methane in terrestrial planets. Astrobiology 13, 15. Snellen, I. et al. Combining high-dispersion spectroscopy with high contrast imaging: Probing rocky planets around our nearest 16. Stark, C. C. et al. Lower limits on aperture size for an ExoEarth detecting coronagraphic mission. ApJ 808, 149–165 (2015). 17. Patel, B. H., Percivalle, C., Ritson, D. J., Duffy, C. D. & Sutherland, J. D. Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism. Nature Chem. 7, 301–307 (2015). 18. Mlynczak, M. G., Hunt, L. A. & Thomas, M. B. and 13 coauthors. Observations of infrared radiative cooling in the thermosphere on daily to multiyear timescales from the TIMED/SABER instrument. JGR 115(Issue A3), CiteIDA03309 (2010). 8 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4 19. Lopez-Puertas, M. & Funke, B. Gil-López and 6 co-authors Observation of NOx enhancement and ozone depletion in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres after the October-November 2003 solar proton events. JGR 110, A09S43 (2005). 20. Mlynczak, M. G. et al. A combined solar and geomagnetic index for thermospheric climate. GRL 42(Issue 10), 3677–3682 (2015). 21. Verkhoglyadova, O. P. et al. Solar wind driving of ionosphere-thermosphere responses in three storms near St. Patrick's Day in 2012, 2013, and 2015. JGR 121, 8900–8923 (2016). 22. Knipp, D. J. et al. Thermospheric nitric oxide response to shock-led storms. Space Weather, 15, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001567 (2016). Space Res. 45, 28–38 (2010). 23. Rodgers, E. M., Bailey, S. M., Warren, H. P., Woods, T. N. & Eparvier, F. G. Nitric oxide density enhancements due to solar flares. Adv. 24. Maehara, H. et al. Superflares on solar-type stars. Nature 585, 478–481 (2012). 25. France, K. et al. The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. I. Motivation and Overview. ApJ 820, 89–113 (2016). 26. Güdel, M. & Nazé, Y. X-ray spectroscopy of stars. A&A Rv 17, 309–408 (2009). 27. Lyons, T. W., Reinhard, C. T. & Planavsky, N. J. The rise of oxygen in Earth's early ocean and atmosphere. Nature 506, 307–315 (2014). 28. Airapetian, V. S. & Gronoff, G. The Onset of Great Oxydation Event. in preparation (2017). 29. Andrews, M. D. Lasco and eit Observations of the Bastille day 2000 Solar Storm. Sol. Phys. 204, 179–196 (2001). 30. Tabataba-Vakili, F., Grenfell, J. L. & Griebmeier, J.-M. Rauer. Atmospheric effects of stellar cosmic rays on Earth-like exoplanets orbiting M-dwarfs. A&A 585, A96–A112 (2016). in air. J. Chem. Phys. 65, 154–167 (1976). 31. Porter, H. S., Jackman, C. H. & Green, A. E. S. Efficiencies for production of atomic nitrogen and oxygen by relativistic proton impact 32. Cohen, O. et al. Magnetospheric structure and atmospheric Joule heating of habitable planets orbiting M-dwarf stars. ApJ 790, 57–70 (2014). CiteIDA03314 (2012). A10301 (2010). (1993). 6, 308–331 (2006). 33. Lei, J. et al. Overcooling in the upper thermosphere during the recovery phase of the 2003 October storms. JGR 117(A3), 34. Qian, L., Solomon, S. C. & Mlynczak, M. Model simulation of thermospheric response to recurrent geomagnetic forcing. JGR 115, 35. Mlynczak, M. G. & Solomon, S. A detailed evaluation of the heating efficiency in the middle atmosphere. JGR 98, 10517–10541 36. Mello, P. D. G., Fernandez del Peloso, E. & Ghezzi, L. Astrobiologically Interesting Stars Within 10 Parsecs of the Sun. Astrobiology 37. Cowan, N. B. et al. Characterizing transiting planet atmospheres through 2025. PASP 127, 311–327 (2015). 38. Greene, T. P. et al. Characterizing transiting exoplanet atmospheres with JWST. ApJ 817, 17–39 (2016). 39. Danchi, W. C. & Barry, R. The Fourier-Kelvin Stellar Interferometer (FKSI) - infrared detection and characterization of exozodiacal dust to super-earths: a progress report. Proc. SPIE 7734, 1–11 (2010). 40. Airapetian, V. S. et al., Detecting the beacons of life with Exo-Life Beacon Space Telescope (ELBST). Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop, held 27–28 February and 1 March, 2017 in Washington, DC. LPI Contribution No. 1989, id.8214 (2017). 41. Douglass, A. R., Jackman, C. H. & Stolarski, R. S. Comparison of model results transporting the odd nitrogen family with results transporting separate odd nitrogen species. JGR 94, 9862–9872 (1989). 42. Jackman, C. H. et al. Middle atmospheric changes caused by the January and March 2012 solar proton events. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 43. Fleming, E. L., Jackman, C. H., Weisenstein, D. K. & Ko, M. K. W. The impact of interannual variability on multidecadal total ozone 44. Jackman, C. H. et al. Neutral atmospheric influences of the solar proton events in October-November 2003. JGR 100, A09S27, 45. Sander, S. P. et al. Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies. Evaluation Number 17, JPL Publication 14, 1025–1038 (2014). simulations. JGR 112, D10310 (2007). CiteID D10310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010888 (2005). 10–16 (2010). 46. Jackman, C. H., Frederick, J. E. & Stolarski, R. S. Production of odd nitrogen in the stratosphere and mesosphere - An intercomparison of source strengths. JGR 85, 7495–7505 (1980). 47. Jackman, C. H. et al. Northern hemisphere atmospheric effects due to the July 2000 Solar Proton Event. GRL 28, 2883–2886 (2001). Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the referees for constructive suggestions that improved and clarified the major findings of this paper. VA's work was supported by internal funding from NASA GSFC's Sellers Exoplanetary Environments Collaboration (SEEC) and by NASA's Exobiology program, Grant No. 80NSSC17K0463. VA performed the part of this work while staying at ELSI/Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan. Author Contributions V.S.A. conceived and designed the numerical experiments, analysed the data, contributed materials and wrote the manuscript. C.J. contributed to the development and execution of codes and data analysis, M.M. and L.H. contributed to the data analysis, W.D. contributed to development of the manuscript and to data analysis. Additional Information Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per- mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2017 9 www.nature.com/scientificreports/Scientific RepoRts 7: 14141 DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14192-4
1910.06479	1	1910	2019-10-15T01:56:34	How do Planetary Radius and Gravity Influence the Surface Climate of Earth-like Planets?	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	About 4000 exoplanets have been confirmed since the year of 1992, and for most of the planets, the main parameters that can be measured are planetary radius and mass. Based on these two parameters, surface gravity can be estimated. In this work, we investigate the effects of varying radius and gravity on the climate of rapidly rotating terrestrial planets with assuming they have an ocean and Earth-like atmospheres (N$_2$, CO$_2$, and H$_2$O). Using a three-dimensional (3D) atmospheric general circulation model (GCM), we find that varying radius mainly influences the equator-to-pole surface temperature difference while varying gravity mainly influences the mean surface temperature. For planets of larger radii, the meridional atmospheric energy transport is weaker, which warms the tropics but cools high latitudes. For planets of larger gravities, the surface is globally cooler due to the fact that saturated vapor pressure depends on air temperature only and column water vapor mass is approximately equal to saturated vapor pressure over gravity multiplied by relative humidity. The relative humidity does not change much in our experiments. Ice albedo and water vapor feedbacks act to further amplify the effects of varying radius and gravity. These results suggest that radius and gravity are important factors for planetary climate, although they are not as critical as stellar flux, atmospheric composition and mass, and rotation rate. Future simulations are required to know how large the radius and gravity could influence the width of the habitable zone using 3D GCMs.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version October 16, 2019 Typeset using LATEX manuscript style in AASTeX62 9 1 0 2 t c O 5 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 9 7 4 6 0 . 0 1 9 1 : v i X r a How do Planetary Radius and Gravity Influence the Surface Climate of Earth-like Planets? Huanzhou Yang1, and Jun Yang1 1Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China ABSTRACT About 4000 exoplanets have been confirmed since the year of 1992, and for most of the planets, the main parameters that can be measured are planetary radius and mass. Based on these two parameters, surface gravity can be estimated. In this work, we investigate the effects of varying radius and gravity on the climate of rapidly rotating terrestrial planets with assuming they have an ocean and Earth-like atmospheres (N2, CO2, and H2O). Using a three-dimensional (3D) atmospheric general circulation model (GCM), we find that varying radius mainly influences the equator-to-pole surface temperature difference while varying gravity mainly influences the mean surface temperature. For planets of larger radii, the meridional atmospheric energy transport is weaker, which warms the tropics but cools high latitudes. For planets of larger gravities, the surface is globally cooler due to the fact that saturated vapor pressure depends on air temperature only and column water vapor mass is approximately equal to saturated vapor pressure over gravity multiplied by relative humidity. The relative humidity does not change much in our experiments. Ice albedo and water vapor feedbacks act to further amplify the effects of varying radius and gravity. These results suggest that radius and gravity are important factors for planetary climate, although Corresponding author: Jun Yang [email protected] 2 Yang & Yang they are not as critical as stellar flux, atmospheric composition and mass, and rotation rate. Future simulations are required to know how large the radius and gravity could influence the width of the habitable zone using 3D GCMs. Keywords: planets and satellites: general -- planets and satellites: atmospheres -- methods: numerical -- astrobiology 1. INTRODUCTION Finding potentially habitable planets beyond the solar system is the prime target of exoplanet mis- sions. These planets should have sizes or masses similar to Earth and meanwhile be in the habitable zone within which planetary surface is temperate to maintain liquid water (Kasting et al. 1993). Previous studies have shown that various factors could influence the surface climate of planets in the habitable zone, including the stellar flux on the planet, stellar spectrum, atmospheric composition and mass, planetary rotation rate, planetary obliquity, orbital eccentricity, etc. (Kopparapu et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2013; Turbet et al. 2016; Wolf et al. 2017; Salameh et al. 2018; Del Genio et al. 2019). However, the effects of planetary radius and gravity have rarely been studied although these two parameters much better known than other parameters in observations. With doppler and transit techniques, the mass (or the minimum mass) and the radius of exoplanets can be measured, although significant uncertainties exist (Weiss & Marcy 2014). For the radii and gravities of several potentially habitable planets, please see Figure 1. Kopparapu et al. (2014) explored the effect of planetary masses on the habitable zone using a 1D radiative transfer model. They found that the inner edge of the habitable zone for planets with larger masses are closer to the star because water vapor column path becomes smaller. Using an idealized 3D GCM with a gray radiation scheme and without the feedbacks of water vapor, cloud, or ice albedo, Kaspi & Showman (2015) investigated the effects of various parameters (rotation rate, stellar flux, atmospheric mass, atmospheric optical thickness, surface gravity, and radius) on the atmospheric circulation and the equator-to-pole surface temperature difference on terrestrial planets Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 3 Figure 1. Planetary radius and gravity distribution of several confirmed exoplanets. The values of Earth and Mars and the uncertainties are shown. The black line represents the theory relation with a core mass fraction of Earth's value, 0.26 (Zeng et al. 2016). orbiting G-type stars. They found that larger planets have a smaller meridional surface temperature gradient (in units of K km−1) but a larger equator-to-pole temperature difference (in a unit of K). Kilic et al. (2017a) investigated the effect of varying gravity on the atmospheric circulation using an idealized GCM with fixed surface temperatures. Komacek & Abbot (2019) did a similar work to Kaspi & Showman (2015) but used a more complex GCM that includes the effects of cloud, water vapor feedback, nongray radiative transfer, and sea ice; moreover, they simulated planets orbiting both Sun-like and M-type stars. They found that the equator-to-pole surface temperature difference is enhanced for larger planets orbiting Sun-like stars; this trend is the same as that found in Kaspi & Showman (2015). They also found that the equator-to-pole temperature difference increases with increasing gravity but the underlying mechanism was not addressed. In this work we analyze how radius and gravity influence the surface climate of rapidly rotating planets using a 3D GCM with nongray radiation transfer. Compared to the idealized model used in Kaspi & Showman (2015), the model we employed is better in investigating the response of the climate because water vapor, cloud, and ice albedo feedbacks could be included in our simulations. Compared 0.60.811.21.41.61.8Radius (R)00.511.522.5Gravity (g)EarthMarsK2-18bKepler-438bKepler-186fKepler-442bKepler-452bKepler-62eKepler-62fTrappist-1dTrappist-1eTrappist-1fTrappist-1gCMF=0.264 Yang & Yang to the work of Komacek & Abbot (2019), we will more clearly show the underlying mechanisms for the effects of varying radius and gravity on the surface climate. The outline of this paper is as follows. In section 2, we describe the model and experimental designs. In section 3, we demonstrate the results and analyze the underlying mechanisms. In most of our analyses, surface temperature is the key variable, and atmospheric circulation is briefly ad- dressed in case to understand the response of the meridional surface temperature gradient. In section 4, we discuss the effect of cloud feedback and the possible effect of varying radius and gravity on wind-driven ocean circulation. Conclusions are stated in section 5. 2. MODEL DESCRIPTIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS We employ the 3D GCM -- the Community Atmospheric Model version 3, CAM3. The model was developed to simulate the climate of Earth in the present, past, and future (Collins et al. 2004). We have modified the model to simulate the climates of various planets in the habitable zone around different stars (Yang et al. 2013, 2017). The model solves the primitive equations for atmospheric motion on a rotating sphere and the equations for radiative transfer, convection, condensation, pre- cipitation, cloud, and boundary turbulence (Boville et al. 2006). The model is coupled to a 50 m mixed layer ocean module and a thermodynamic sea ice module. The surface is set to be seawater everywhere, i.e., an aquaplanet. Meridional oceanic heat transport is specified to be similar to mod- ern Earth but it is set to be symmetry about the equator. Neither ocean nor sea ice dynamics are considered. We perform three groups of experiments. In the first and second groups, we vary the radius and gravity separately, in order to isolate the dependence of the climate on each parameter. In the third, we modify the radius and gravity simultaneously. Three values of radius (R) were examined, 0.5, 1, and 2 of Earth's value (6371 km), denoted as 0.5R⊕, 1R⊕, and 2R⊕, respectively. Three values of gravity (g) have also been investigated, 0.5g⊕, 1g⊕, and 2g⊕ (g⊕ = 9.8 m s−1). Results comparing 0.5R⊕ and 1R⊕ and comparing 1R⊕ and 2R⊕ are similar in surface temperature changes, so that for concision we show the results of the latter, and the same for gravity. Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 5 Two types of experiments were performed, one with neither sea ice nor ice albedo feedback (the freezing point is artificially set to an extremely low value, such as 100 K), and the other one with sea ice and ice albedo feedback (the freezing point is 271.35 K, or -1.8◦C). The first type is set in order to more clearly know the direct effects of varying radius and gravity, and the second type is set in order to know the effect of ice/snow albedo feedback. Sea ice albedo is 0.68 in the visible band and 0.30 in the near-infrared band, and snow albedo is 0.91 and 0.63, respectively (Briegleb et al. 2002). Atmospheric compositions are set to be Earth-like, a N2-dominated atmosphere with CO2 and H2O but no ozone. CO2 mixing ratio is 600 ppmv (this value does not influence our conclusion). When the gravity is modified, we assume the column air mass (as well as column CO2 mass) does not change, so that the surface pressure varies. For instance, the surface pressure is 1.0 and 2.0 bar for the gravity of 1g⊕ and 2g⊕, respectively, but the column air mass (≈104 kg m−2) and the column CO2 mass (≈9.4 kg m−2) are the same between the experiments. An additional experiment with a 1 bar atmosphere and 1200 ppmv CO2 under 2g⊕ is also performed and we find that it does not significantly influence our results (see Figure 3). Each run is initialized from a state close to modern Earth but without sea ice. Each experiment runs for about 60 Earth years and the final 5 years are used for the analyses shown hereafter. Orbital parameters are set as simplified as possible. Both obliquity and eccentricity of the orbit are set to zero. Rotation period and orbital period are equal to those of Earth. The solar radiation is 1365 W m−2 and the spectrum of the Sun is used. So that, the results shown here are for rapidly rotating planets around G-type stars. In a separate paper, we address the effect of varying radius and gravity on the climates for tidally locked planets around M stars (Yang et al. 2019a). 3. RESULTS 3.1. Effects of Varying Planetary Radius When increasing the planetary radius, the main characterization of the surface temperature changed is that the equator becomes warmer and the polar regions become cooler (Figure 2(a)), which means 6 Yang & Yang Figure 2. Effects of varying radius on the climate of Earth-like aqua-planets. (a) Zonal-mean surface temperatures. (b) Meridional gradient of the surface temperatures in units of 10−3 K km−1. (c & d) Zonal-mean zonal winds (color shading) and the corresponding zonal winds calculated based on thermal wind balance (contour lines). (e & f) Zonal-mean air temperature (color shading) and zonal-mean mass streamfunction in units of 1011 kg s−1 (contour lines). (g & h) Transient air temperature anomaly at the level of 200 hPa (the zonal-mean values are subtracted). (i & j) Zonal-mean meridional transport (PW, 1 PW = 1015 W) of dry static energy, latent heat, and total energy. (k) Zonal-mean meridional energy transport by transient eddies. Stationary eddies can be ignored because of the absence of continents and seasonal cycles in our experiments. (l) Zonal-mean net radiation flux (shortwave minus longwave) at the top of the atmosphere. In order to more direct comparisons, the values for the 2R⊕ case in (i -- k) are divided by a factor of 4, due to the fact that its sphere area is four times that in the 1R⊕ case. Note that the ice and ice albedo feedback are turned off in these experiments. Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 7 that the temperature difference between the equator and the poles in the unit of K becomes larger. However, the surface temperature gradient ( ∂T R∂φ , where R is the planetary radius and φ is the latitude) in the unit of K km−1 decreases (Figure 2(b)), which is primarily due to the geometrical ∂y = ∂T effect of increasing R. Note that in discussing the temperature contrast for different radii, the units are important. The change of global-mean surface temperature between these two cases is small, only 1.1 K. Due to the decrease of the surface temperature gradient, all of the atmospheric jets, tropical Hadley cells, and mid-latitude Ferrel cells and transient eddies become weaker (Figure 2(c -- h)). As a result, the meridional energy transport, including both dry static energy and latent heat, decreases (Figure 2(i -- k)). This means less energy is transported from the tropics to the polar regions, so that the surface temperatures in the deep tropics increase and meanwhile the surface temperatures in high latitudes decrease. The area-mean decrease in the divergence of the meridional energy transport is 5.8 W m−2 (Figure 2(l)). Comparing Figure 2(e) to Figure 2(f), one could find that the Hadley cells become narrower in the unit of degrees latitude (◦) but become wider in the unit of distance (m) when the radius is increased from 1R⊕ to 2R⊕. The change of the Hadley Cell width can be understood using the theory of Phillips (1954) and Held (2001): φh ∝ ( N H ΩR 1 2 , or Dh ∝ ( ) N HR Ω 1 2 , ) (1) where N is the buoyancy frequency, H is the scale height, and Ω is the rotating rate. Clearly, the value of φh decreases whereas the value of Dh increases with increasing R. While the width of the Hadley cells is connected to R, the characteristic length scale of mid-latitude eddies is not. It is determined by nature properties of the atmosphere. For example, the first deformation radius of baroclinic eddies is equal to N H/f , where f is the Coriolis frequency (Vallis 2006). When the planetary radius is changed, the values of N and H exhibit very small changes, so that the length scale of mid-latitude eddies in the unit of meters nearly does not change (Figure 2(g -- h)). The eddy length scale relative to the value of R, however, becomes smaller, which also promotes a weaker 8 Yang & Yang meridional energy transport in mid-latitudes, as previously pointed out in Kaspi & Showman (2015). 3.2. Effects of Varying Planetary Gravity When the gravity is increased, the surface temperatures decrease, regardless of whether the column air mass or the surface pressure is fixed (Figure 3(a)). In global mean, the surface temperature decreases by 8 K comparing (2g⊕, 2bar) and (1g⊕, 1bar). The main reason for the surface cooling is the decreasing of water vapor content (Figure 3(b)) and thereby the clear-sky greenhouse effect falls (Figure 3(c)). For a pure water vapor atmosphere, the water vapor mass per unit area is inversely proportional to gravity: es/g, where es is the saturation vapor pressure and it only depends on air temperature. For an atmosphere with background gas (such as N2), the column water vapor mass per unit area is: M = (cid:90) P0 0 (cid:90) P0 0 q dp g ≈ ε g γes dp p , (2) where q is the specific humidity, P0 is the surface pressure, γ is the relative humidity, ε is the ratio of H2O molecular mass to total air molecular mass (ε = 0.622 for the present-day Earth), p is the air pressure, and dp is the pressure change between two levels. From this equation, it is clear to see that the column vapor mass is approximately inversely proportional to gravity, as long as γ has no significant change. Indeed, γ does not change much in the experiments. Therefore, less (more) water vapor is required to maintain a given vapor pressure for a larger (smaller) gravity, as discussed in Pierrehumbert (2010) and Kopparapu et al. (2014). Beside the decrease in the global-mean surface temperature, the cooling in high latitudes is greater than that in the tropics (a 'polar amplification'), i.e., the meridional temperature gradient increases. The underlying mechanisms are essentially the inverse of a global-warming response, including the water vapor feedback, cloud feedback, lapse rate feedback, Planck feedback, response of meridional energy transport, and changes of surface latent and sensible heat fluxes, as illustrated for instance in Felix & Mauritsen (2014). The dominating mechanism is that the meridional energy transport diminishes significantly in mid-latitudes when increasing gravity (Figure 3(d)), promoting a greater Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 9 Figure 3. Effects of varying gravity on the climate of Earth-like aqua-planets. (a) Zonal-mean surface temperatures. (b) Vertically-integrated water vapor mass. (c) Atmospheric clear-sky greenhouse effect. (d) Meridional total energy transport. (e & f) Air temperature (color shading) and mass streamfunction in units of 1011 kg s−1 (contour lines). (g & h) Global-mean air temperature profile in the z-coordinate and in the p-coordinate. Note that the ice and ice albedo feedback are turned off in these experiments. cooling in high latitudes. The reducing of the energy transport mainly results from the decrease of latent heat transport (figure not shown). The Hadley and Ferrel cells, however, become stronger, the same as that found in the studies of Kaspi & Showman (2015) and Komacek & Abbot (2019); this is due to the increasing of the temperature gradient. Global-mean temperature profiles for different gravities are shown in Figure 3(g-h). coordinate, the lapse rate (Γ = − dT dz ) increases with gravity. This is due to the change in the scale height, which is inversely proportional to gravity. In the p coordinate, however, the lapse rate ( dT dp ) In the z nearly does not change. 10 Yang & Yang Comparing the cases (2g⊕, 2bar) and (2g⊕, 1bar), one could find that the surface temperature decreases in the tropics but increases slightly in the polar regions as increasing the air mass. This is due to the combined effect of enhanced atmospheric Rayleigh scattering and increased meridional energy transport from the tropics to the polar regions (Figure 3(d)). The clear-sky planetary albedos are 0.17 and 0.13 in the cases of (2g⊕, 2bar) and (2g⊕, 1bar), respectively, and for given atmospheric velocities, the meridional energy transport could be higher for a larger air mass. When we were writing this manuscript, Thomson & Vallis (2019) published a gravity -- climate paper that has the same conclusion shown here. Using theoretical arguments and 3D GCM simulations, they found that the same mechanism: a larger gravity leads to a less condensible (such as water vapor) and thereby a weaker greenhouse effect, so that the surface becomes cooler. 3.3. Results Including Ice Albedo Feedback When sea ice is included, the climatic response to varying radius and gravity becomes greater (Fig- ure 4). When only the radius is doubled, (2R⊕, 1g⊕) versus (1R⊕, 1g⊕), the surface temperature increases in the deep tropics but decreases in the mid- and high-latitudes. This is primarily due to the weakening of the meridional energy transport (Figure 4(d)), as discussed in the section 3.1. The cooling in the mid- and high-latitudes is larger than that in the simulations without ice albedo feedback (see Figure 2(a)). This is because that the sea ice edges expand toward the equator (Fig- ure 4(b)), increasing the surface albedo and thereby cooling the system. Water vapor feedback acts to further cool the mid- and high-latitudes where the water vapor amount decreases but warms the deep tropics where it increases (Figure 4(c)). In global mean, the surface temperature decreases by 14 K. When only the gravity is doubled, (1R⊕, 2g⊕) versus (1R⊕, 1g⊕), the surface temperature decreases everywhere (blue line in Figure 4), and the global-mean surface temperature decreases by 50 K. The dominated mechanism is the decrease of water vapor amount with gravity, as discussed in the section 3.2. Ice albedo feedback acts to further cool the surface. The meridional energy transport Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 11 Figure 4. Effects of varying radius and gravity on the climate of Earth-like aqua-planets with ice albedo feedback considered. (a) Zonal-mean surface temperature, (b) zonal-mean sea ice fraction, (c) vertically integrated water vapor mass, and (d) meridional total energy transport. In (d), the values of (2R⊕, 1g⊕) and (2R⊕, 2g⊕) are divided by a factor of 4, same as that in Figure 2. decreases and its peak shifts toward the equator. This is due to that less solar radiation is absorbed by water vapor in the air and by the surface, so that less energy is required to be transported poleward. When the radius and gravity are doubled simultaneously, the surface temperature decreases ev- erywhere, (2R⊕, 2g⊕) versus (1R⊕, 1g⊕), except in the deep tropics where the surface temperature nearly does no change (green line in Figure 4). In global mean, the surface temperature decreases by 28 K. The negligible change of surface temperature in the deep tropics is due to the competition between the cooling effect of decreasing water vapor amount and the warming effect of reducing meridional energy transport. 4. DISCUSSION Cloud is an important component of the climate system but it has a high uncertainty in GCM sim- ulations (e.g., Yang et al. 2019b). Figure 5(a) shows the net cloud radiative effect in the experiments with ice turned off. In global mean, its changes are within 6 W m−2, much smaller than the changes of clear-sky greenhouse effect, 20 -- 40 W m−2 (Figure 3(c)). As increasing gravity, cloud water path decreases significantly especially in the deep tropics (figure not shown) because less water vapor can be maintained in the atmosphere as addressed in section 3.2. 12 Yang & Yang Ocean circulation could also be influenced by planetary radius and gravity. Figure 5(b) shows the zonal surface wind stresses. When the radius is increased, the wind stresses generally become smaller, due to the decrease of surface temperature gradients as addressed in section 3.1. This implies that the wind-driven ocean circulation would become weaker. When the gravity is increased, the wind stresses generally becomes greater, due to the increase of surface temperature gradients as addressed in section 3.2. This implies that the wind-driven ocean circulation would become stronger. Future work is required to quantitatively understand the net effect of varying radius and gravity on the ocean circulation and meridional ocean heat transport using fully coupled atmosphere -- ocean GCMs. Figure 5. (a) Zonal-mean cloud radiative effect (longwave plus shortwave) at the top of the atmosphere and (b) zonal-mean zonal surface wind stresses, in the experiments without ice albedo feedback. 5. CONCLUSION By employing one global climate model to examine the effects of planetary radius and gravity on the surface climate of rapidly rotating Earth-like aqua-planets, we are led to the following conclusions: • For one planet with a larger radius, the meridional temperature gradient ( ∂T R∂φ ) becomes weaker mainly due to the geometrical effect. As a result, the atmospheric jets, Hadley cells, Ferrel cells, and mid-latitude eddies weaken, and the meridional energy transport decreases, which has a warming effect in the tropics but a cooling effect in high latitudes. Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 13 • For one planet with a greater gravity, the surface temperature decreases everywhere mainly because water vapor content in the air decreases. The vertically-integrated water vapor mass is approximately inversely proportional to gravity. This conclusion could be applicable to other condensible greenhouse gases, such as CH4 on Titan-like satellites, CO2 on Mars-like planets, and N2 on Pluto-like satellites. • When the radius and gravity are increased simultaneously, the surface temperature decreases nearly everywhere. This is due to that the effect of varying gravity is stronger than that of varying radius in the simulations. Ice albedo feedback and water vapor feedback act to further amplify the response of the surface temperature. These results suggest that future studies on the climate and habitability of exoplanets and on the inner and outer edges of the habitable zone should consider the effects of different radii and gravities. Acknowledgments: J.Y. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants 41675071 and 41861124002. REFERENCES Boville, B. A., Rasch, P. J., Hack, J. J., & McCaa, Del Genio, A. D., Way, M. J., Amundsen, D. S., J. R. 2006, Journal of Climate, 19, 2184 Aleinov, I., Kelley, M., Kiang, N. Y., & Clune, Briegleb, B., Bitz, C., Hunke, E., Lipscomb, W., T. L. 2019, Astrobiology, 19, 99, pMID: & Schramm, J. 2002, National Center for 30183335 Atmospheric Research Dressing, C. D., Spiegel, D. S., Scharf, C. A., Chemke, R., Kaspi, Y., & Halevy, I. 2016, Menou, K., & Raymond, S. N. 2010, The Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 11,414 Astrophysical Journal, 721, 1295 Collins, W. D., Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., Hack, J. J., Mccaa, J. R., Williamson, D. L., Kiehl, J. T., Briegleb, B., Bitz, C., Lin, S.-j., Zhang, M., & Dai, Y. 2004, National Center for Atmospheric Research Felix, P. & Mauritsen, T. 2014, Nature Geoscience, 7, 181 Fujii, Y., Genio, A. D. D., & Amundsen, D. S. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 848, 100 14 Yang & Yang Han, E., Wang, S. X., Wright, J. T., Feng, Y. K., Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R. M., SchottelKotte, Zhao, M., Fakhouri, O., Brown, J. I., & J., Kasting, J. F., Domagal-Goldman, S., & Hancock, C. 2014, Publications of the Eymet, V. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 126, 827 787, L29 Haqq-Misra, J., Wolf, E. T., Joshi, M., Zhang, X., Kopparapu, R. K., Wolf, E. T., Arney, G., & Kopparapu, R. K. 2018, The Astrophysical Batalha, N. E., Haqq-Misra, J., Grimm, S. L., Journal, 852, 67 & Heng, K. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, Held, I. 2001, The General Circulation of the 845, 5 Atmosphere, https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/isaac- Phillips, N. A. 1954, Tellus, 6, 273 held-homepage/ Howard, A. W. 2013, Science, 340, 572 Hu, Y. & Yang, J. 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 629 Kaspi, Y. & Showman, A. P. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 804, 60 Kasting, J. F., Chen, H., & Kopparapu, R. K. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 813, L3 Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2010, Principles of Planetary Climate (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press) Salameh, J., Popp, M., & Marotzke, J. 2018, Climate Dynamics, 50, 2395 Scalo, J., Kaltenegger, L., Segura, A., Fridlund, M., Ribas, I., Kulikov, Y. N., Grenfell, J. L., Rauer, H., Odert, P., Leitzinger, M., Selsis, F., Khodachenko, M. L., Eiroa, C., Kasting, J., & Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, Lammer, H. 2007, Astrobiology, 7, 85 R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108 Seager, S. 2013, Science, 340, 577 Kilic, C., Raible, C., F. Stocker, T., & Kirk, E. Sharp, Z. & Draper, D. 2013, Earth and Planetary 2017a, Planetary and Space Science, 135, 1 Science Letters, 369-370, 71 Kilic, C., Raible, C. C., & Stocker, T. F. 2017b, Spiegel, D. S., Menou, K., & Scharf, C. A. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 844, 147 The Astrophysical Journal, 691, 596 Komacek, T. D. & Abbot, D. S. 2019, The Thomson, S. I. & Vallis, G. K. 2019 Astrophysical Journal, 245 Turbet, M., Leconte, J., Selsis, F., Bolmont, E., Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., Forget, F., Ribas, I., Raymond, S. N., & Eymet, V., Robinson, T. D., Mahadevan, S., Anglada-Escud´e, G. 2016, A&A, 596, A112 Terrien, R. C., Domagal-Goldman, S., Vallis, G. K. 2006, Atmospheric and Oceanic Meadows, V., & Deshpande, R. 2013, The Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Astrophysical Journal, 765, 131 University Press) Planetary Radius, Gravity, and Climate 15 Vladilo, G., Murante, G., Silva, L., Provenzale, Yang, J., Ding, F., Ramirez, R. M., Peltier, A., Ferri, G., & Ragazzini, G. 2013, The W. R., Hu, Y., & Liu, Y. 2017, Nature Astrophysical Journal, 767, 65 Geoscience, 10, 556 Weiss, L. M. & Marcy, G. W. 2014, ApJ, 783, L6 Wolf, E. T., Shields, A. L., Kopparapu, R. K., Haqq-Misra, J., & Toon, O. B. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 837, 107 Yang, H., Komacek, T. D., & Abbot, D. S. 2019a, The Astrophysical Journal, 876, L27 Yang, J., Cowan, N. B., & Abbot, D. S. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 771, L45 Yang, J., Leconte, J., Wolf, E. T., Merlis, T., Koll, D. D. B., Forget, F., & Abbot, D. S. 2019b, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 1 Zeng, L., Sasselov, D. D., & Jacobsen, S. B. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 127
1205.0010	2	1205	2012-10-22T05:30:09	How Thermal Evolution and Mass Loss Sculpt Populations of Super-Earths and Sub-Neptunes: Application to the Kepler-11 System and Beyond	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We use models of thermal evolution and XUV-driven mass loss to explore the composition and history of low-mass low-density transiting planets. We investigate the Kepler-11 system in detail and provide estimates of both the current and past planetary compositions. We find that a H/He atmosphere on Kepler-11b is highly vulnerable to mass loss. By comparing to formation models, we show that in situ formation of the system is unlikely. Instead we propose that it is a water-rich system of sub-Neptunes that migrated from beyond the snow line. For the broader population of observed planets, we show that there is a threshold in bulk planet density and incident flux above which no low-mass transiting planets have been observed. We suggest that this threshold is due to the instability of H/He atmospheres to XUV-driven mass loss. Importantly, we find that this flux-density threshold is well reproduced by our thermal evolution/contraction models that incorporate a standard mass loss prescription. Treating the planets' contraction history is essential because the planets have significantly larger radii during the early era of high XUV fluxes. Over time low mass planets with H/He envelopes can be transformed into water-dominated worlds with steam atmospheres or rocky super-Earths. Finally, we use this threshold to provide likely minimum masses and radial velocity amplitudes for the general population of Kepler candidates. Likewise, we use this threshold to provide constraints on the maximum radii of low-mass planets found by radial velocity surveys.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 HOW THERMAL EVOLUTION AND MASS LOSS SCULPT POPULATIONS OF SUPER-EARTHS AND SUB-NEPTUNES: APPLICATION TO THE KEPLER-11 SYSTEM AND BEYOND ERIC D. LOPEZ, JONATHAN J. FORTNEY1, AND NEIL MILLER Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Draft version November 1, 2018 ABSTRACT We use models of thermal evolution and XUV-driven mass loss to explore the composition and history of low-mass low-density transiting planets. We investigate the Kepler-11 system in detail and provide estimates of both the current and past planetary compositions. We find that a H/He envelope on Kepler-11b is highly vulnerable to mass loss. By comparing to formation models, we show that in situ formation of the system is extremely difficult. Instead we propose that it is a water-rich system of sub-Neptunes that migrated from beyond the snow line. For the broader population of observed planets, we show that there is a threshold in bulk planet density and incident flux above which no low-mass transiting planets have been observed. We suggest that this threshold is due to the instability of H/He envelopes to XUV-driven mass loss. Importantly, we find that this mass loss threshold is well reproduced by our thermal evolution/contraction models that incorporate a standard mass loss prescription. Treating the planets' contraction history is essential because the planets have significantly larger radii during the early era of high XUV fluxes. Over time low mass planets with H/He envelopes can be transformed into water-dominated worlds with steam envelopes or rocky super-Earths. Finally, we use this threshold to provide likely minimum masses and radial velocity amplitudes for the general population of Kepler candidates. Likewise, we use this threshold to provide constraints on the maximum radii of low-mass planets found by radial velocity surveys. Subject headings: planetary systems; planets and satellites: composition, formation, interiors, physical evolu- tion; stars: individual (Kepler-11) 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the frontier of the search for extrasolar planets has pushed towards ever smaller and more Earth-like worlds. We now know of dozens of Neptune mass planets and have even found the first definitively rocky extrasolar planets (Batalha et al. 2011; Léger et al. 2009). In between, transit searches have begun finding a population of low-mass low-density "super-Earths". Beginning with the discovery of GJ1214b (Charbonneau et al. 2009), these planets represent a new class of exoplanets that do not have any analog in our Solar System. Basic questions about their composition, struc- ture, and formation are still unknown. Are these, in fact, scaled up versions of the Earth that simply have thick hydro- gen/helium envelopes atop of rock/iron cores? Or are they instead scaled down versions of Neptune that are rich in wa- ter and other volatile ices? The distinction between water-poor super-Earths or water- rich sub-Neptunes has fundamental implications for how these planets formed. So far these low-mass low-density (hereafter LMLD) planets have only been found well inside the snow-line. If these planets only contain rock, iron, and hydrogen/helium, then it is possible they formed close to their current orbits (Hansen & Murray 2011). However, if a signif- icant fraction of their mass is in water, then they must have formed beyond the snow-line and migrated in to their current locations (Alibert et al. 2011; Ida & Lin 2010; Rogers et al. 2011). The Kepler-11 system (Lissauer et al. 2011a) is an ex- tremely powerful tool for exploring the features of LMLD planets. With six transiting planets orbiting a close solar ana- log, it is the richest extrasolar system currently known. More- 1Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow over, five of the planets have masses from Transit Timing Variations (TTVs), and all five of these fall into the low-mass low-density regime in between Earth and Neptune. These five planets are all interior to Mercury's orbit, with periods from 10 to 47 days. This provides a unique laboratory to test the possible composition, formation, and evolution of LMLD planets and how these vary as a function of both period and planet mass. Transiting planets with measured masses, like those in Kepler-11, are particularly valuable because we can determine their mean density. All the planets in Kepler-11 have densities too low for pure rock, and therefore must have some sort of thick envelope of volatiles. Likewise, all the planets except Kepler-11b are less dense than pure water and so must have at least some hydrogen/helium. Unfortunately, mass and radius alone cannot uniquely de- termine a planet's composition. In general, there is a large degeneracy between the relative amounts of rock, iron, water, and hydrogen/helium (Rogers & Seager 2010a). This prob- lem is particularly acute for planets with radii ≈ 2 - 4 R⊕, since in this range any of these four constituents can be im- portant. Indeed these sorts of degeneracies have long been a focus of studies of Uranus and Neptune (Hubbard et al. 1991; Fortney et al. 2011). One possible solution to the composition problem is to ob- tain multi-wavelength transmission spectra, as has been done for GJ1214b (Bean et al. 2011; Désert et al. 2011; Croll et al. 2011). Since hydrogen-rich atmospheres have much larger scale heights at a given temperature, near infrared water and methane absorption features will be much more prominent for planets with hydrogen/helium envelopes (Miller-Ricci et al. 2009; Miller-Ricci & Fortney 2010). Unfortunately, these ob- servations are extremely time intensive and even then the pos- sible presence of clouds can make their interpretation diffi- 2 cult. Even worse, nearly all the systems found by Kepler are too faint for these observations with current telescopes. An alternative is to develop models of the formation and evolution of low-mass planets to try and predict what com- positions can form and how those compositions change as a planet evolves. In particular, hydrodynamic mass loss from extreme ultra-violet (XUV) heating can remove large amounts of hydrogen/helium from highly irradiated LMLD planets. Models of XUV driven mass loss were first developed to study water loss from early Venus (Hunten 1982; Kasting & Pollack 1983), and hydrogen loss from the early Earth (Sekiya et al. 1980; Watson et al. 1981). These kinds of models have since been developed to study mass loss from hot Jupiters (e.g., Lammer et al. 2003; Yelle 2004; Murray-Clay et al. 2009; Ehrenreich & Désert 2011; Owen & Jackson 2012), where there is strong evidence that atmospheric escape is an important physical process (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004; Davis & Wheatley 2009; Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2010; Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2012). In Sections 2.3, 3.3, and 5.1 we show that energy-limited hydrodynamic mass loss models, coupled with models of thermal evolution and contraction, can distinguish between water-poor super-Earth and water-rich sub-Neptune scenarios in Kepler-11. Moreover, these models make powerful pre- dictions for the density distribution of the entire population of LMLD transiting planets. In particular, observations show that there is threshold in the bulk density - incident flux distri- bution above which there are no LMLD planets. In Section 4 we examine this threshold and show how it can by reproduced using our thermal evolution models coupled with standard hy- drodynamic mass loss prescriptions. Finally, in Section 4.2 we explore how this threshold can be used to obtain impor- tant constraints on planets without measured densities: We constrain the maximum radii of non-transiting radial velocity planets, and the minimum masses of Kepler candidates. 2. OUR MODEL 2.1. Planet Structure We have built on previous work in Fortney et al. (2007) and Nettelmann et al. (2011) to develop models of the ther- mal evolution of LMLD planets. To simplify what is undoubt- edly a complex interior structure for real planets, we construct model planets with well-defined layers. Low-mass planets are likely to have a significant fraction of their mass in iron and silicate rocks. For simplicity, we assume that these materials are contained in a isothermal rocky core with Earth-like pro- portions of 2/3 silicate rock and 1/3 iron. For the rock, we use the ANEOS (Thompson 1990) olivine equation of state (EOS); while for the iron, we use the SESAME 2140 Fe EOS (Lyon & Johnson 1992). On top of this rock/iron core we then attach an interior adi- abat. The composition of this adiabat depends on the planet model being considered. For this work, we consider three classes of LMLD planets: rocky super-Earths with H/He en- velopes, water-worlds that have pure water envelopes, and sub-Neptunes with a water layer in between the core and the upper H/He layer. For the water-rich sub-Neptune models we assume that this intermediate water-layer has the same mass as the rock/iron core. We choose this value because it is comparable to the water to rock ratio need to fit Kepler-11b as a water-world. This allows us to explore the proposition that all five Kepler-11 planets started out with similar com- positions, but that mass loss has subsequently distinguished them. For hydrogen/helium we use the Saumon et al. (1995) EOS. Meanwhile for water we use the ab-initio H2O-REOS EOS developed by Nettelmann et al. (2008) and French et al. (2009), which was recently confirmed up to 7 Mbar in labora- tory experiments (Knudson et al. 2012). In the Kepler-11 system, our models predict that water will be in the vapor, molecular fluid, and the ionic fluid phases. The interiors are too hot for high pressure ice phases. Finally, we model the radiative upper atmosphere by assuming that the planet becomes isothermal at pressures where the adiabat is cooler than the planet's equilibrium temperature, assuming 20% Bond albedo and uniform re-radiation. We then calculate the radius at 10 mbar which we take to be the transiting radius. We connect the different layers of our models models by requiring that pressure and temperature are continuous across boundaries. We then solve for the interior structure assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. A given model is defined by its mass, composition (i.e., the relative proportions in H/He, water, and the rock/iron core) and the entropy of its interior H/He adia- bat. By tracking changes in composition and entropy we can then connect these models in time and study the thermal and structural evolution of a given planet. 2.2. Thermal Evolution In order to obtain precise constraints on composition, it is important to fully model how a planet cools and contracts due to thermal evolution. Models that only compute an instanta- neous structure (Rogers & Seager 2010b) by necessity must vary the intrinsic luminosity of the planet over several or- ders of magnitude, which can introduce large uncertainties in the current composition. Obtaining precise constraints from thermal evolution is essential when considering mass loss, since mass loss histories are highly sensitive to uncertainties in the current composition. Moreover, since mass loss de- pends strongly on planetary radius (to the third power), the mass loss and thermal histories are inextricably linked. Modeling this contraction requires a detailed understanding of a planet's energy budget. By tracking the net luminosity of a planet, we know how the specific entropy S, (i.e., the en- tropy per unit mass) of the interior adiabat changes with time. For a given mass and composition, this adiabat then defines the planet's structure and so we can track the planet's total ra- dius as the model cools and contracts with time. Equation (1) shows the energy budget for our models and how this relates to the change in entropy dS/dt. Z Mp Mcore dm T dS dt = - Lint + Lradio - cvMcore dTcore dt (1) The left hand side shows the rate of change of the ther- mal energy of the interior adiabat. Positive terms on the right hand side represent energy sources that heat and inflate a planet, while negative terms represent energy losses that al- low a planet to cool and contract. The term Lint = Leff - Leq describes the intrinsic luminosity due to radiation from the planet, where Leq is the planet's luminosity due only to ab- sorbed stellar radiation. The Lradio term describes heating due to radioactive de- cay. The important isotopes are 235U, 40K, 238U, and 232Th. These have half lives of 0.704, 1.27, 4.47, and 14.1 Gyr, respectively. We assume meteoritic abundances given by Anders & Grevesse (1989). We do not consider the early de- cay of 26Al, since we only consider models that are at least 10 Myr after planet formation. The Lradio term has only a minor effect on our models since it is typically an order of magnitude smaller than the other terms in equation (1). Lastly, there is the dTcore/dt term, which represents the de- lay in cooling due to the thermal inertia of the rocky core. As the interior adiabat cools, the core isotherm must also cool, as Tcore equals the temperature at the bottom of the adiabat. When the core makes up a large fraction of the planet's mass, this can significantly slow down the planet's rate of contrac- tion. We assume a core heat capacity of cv = 0.5- 1.0 JK- 1 g- 1 (Alfè et al. 2002; Guillot et al. 1995; Valencia et al. 2010) as in Nettelmann et al. (2011). This range covers values appro- priate for both the cores of the Earth and Jupiter. For our three layer sub-Neptune models we still us the mass in rock and iron for Mcore, since the water layer is generally too hot for ice phases and so it is assumed to be fully convective. For a given interior structure, we determine the intrinsic flux from the interior, at given S of the adiabat, via interpo- lation in a grid of model atmospheres. The values of Tint (a parametrization of the interior flux), Teq, and Teff are tabulated on a grid of surface gravity, interior specific entropy, and inci- dent flux for 50× solar metallicity H/He atmospheres (similar to Neptune). This corresponds to a metal mass fraction of Z ≈ 0.35 and a mean molecular weight of µ ≈ 3.5 g mol- 1. The grid is the same as that described in Nettelmann et al. (2011) for LMLD planet GJ 1214b, where a more detailed description can be found. Here we do expand on that grid to now include a range of incident fluxes, as was done for giant planets in Fortney et al. (2007). In choosing the initial entropy for our evolution model, we assume a "hot start" for model; i.e., we start the models out with a large initial entropy. When then allow the models to cool and contract until either 10 Myr or 100 Myr which is when we begin the coupled thermal and mass loss evolution. This is a common but important assumption. However, in general our thermal evolution models are insensitive to the ini- tial entropy choice by ∼ 100 Myr as in Marley et al. (2007). As a result, we present results at both 10 and 100 Myr. More- over, to gain confidence in our 10 Myr models we examined the effect of starting those models with a lower initial entropy. Specifically, we ran models in which we started the 10 Myr with the entropies found at 100 Myr. This allowed us to sep- arate the effect of the stellar XUV evolution, from any "hot start" vs. "cold start" uncertainties. Future progress in mod- eling the formation of water-rich sub-Neptune planets (e.g., Rogers et al. 2011) may allow for an assessment of the most realistic initial specific entropies. 2.3. XUV-Driven Mass Loss If this heating is large enough, Close-in planets like those in Kepler-11 are highly irradi- ated by extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and x-ray photons. These photons photoionize atomic hydrogen high in a planet's at- mosphere, which in turn produces significant heating (Hunten 1982). it can generate a hydrodynamic wind that is capable of removing signif- icant mass, potentially including heavier elements as well (Kasting & Pollack 1983). We couple this XUV driven mass loss to our thermal evolution models following the approach of Jackson et al. (2010) and Valencia et al. (2010), which ex- plored possible mass loss histories for CoRoT-7b (Léger et al. 2009; Queloz et al. 2009). Similar approaches have also been used to study the coupled evolution of hot Jupiters (e.g., Baraffe et al. 2004, 2005; Hubbard et al. 2007b,a) and hot Neptunes (Baraffe et al. 2006). 3 A common approach to estimate the mass loss rate is to as- sume that some fixed fraction of the XUV energy incident on a planet is converted into heat that does work on the atmosphere to remove mass. This is known as the energy-limited approx- imation (Watson et al. 1981) and allows a relatively simple analytic description of mass loss rates. Me- lim ≈ ǫπFXUVR3 GMpKtide XUV Ktide = (1 - 3 2ξ + 1 2ξ3 ) ξ = RHill RXUV (2) (3) (4) RXUV is Equation (2) describes our estimate of the mass loss rate based on the formulation from (Erkaev et al. 2007). FXUV is the total flux between 1 - 1200 Å, which is given by Ribas(2005) for Sun-like stars. For stars older than 100 Myr, - 1.23 erg s- 1 cm- 2, where Ribas found that at 1 AU FXUV = 29.7τ τ is the age of the star in Gyr. Using this power law, we scale the XUV flux to the appropriate age and semi-major axis for each planet in our models. Although Ribas only targeted Sun- like stars, Sanz-Forcada et al. (2010) found similar results for a wide range of stellar types from M3 to F7. Hereafter, we will simply refer to the entire 1 - 1200 Å; spectrum as XUV. the planetary radius at which the atmo- sphere becomes optically thick to XUV photons, which Murray-Clay et al. (2009) find occurs at pressures around a nanobar, in the hot Jupiter context. For our work, we assume that the atmosphere is isothermal between the op- tical and XUV photospheres. This neglects heating from photo-disassociation, which should occur around a µbar (Miller-Ricci Kempton et al. 2012). However, this effect should be relatively small and if anything will lead to slight underestimate of the mass loss rate. We vary pressure of the XUV photosphere from 0.1 nbar to 10 nbar to include the un- certainty in the structure of the XUV photosphere. For H/He atmospheres on LMLD planets, the nbar radius is typically 10-20% larger than the optical photosphere. Ktide is a cor- rection factor that accounts for the fact that mass only needs to reach the Hill radius to escape (Erkaev et al. 2007). For planets like Kepler-11b today this correction factor increases the mass loss rate by ∼ 10%, however at early times it can increase the rate by as much as a factor of 2. Finally, ǫ is an efficiency factor that parametrizes the frac- tion of the incident XUV flux that is converted into us- able work. This efficiency is set by radiative cooling, es- pecially via Lyman α, and can depend on the level of in- cident flux (Murray-Clay et al. 2009). Kepler-11 is a 8 ± 2 Gyr old Sun-like star. Using the power law from Ribas et al., this implies that current XUV flux at Kepler-11f is ≈ 37 erg s- 1 cm- 2. Similarly, when Kepler-11 was 100 Myr old, the flux at Kepler-11b was ≈ 6 × 104 erg s- 1 cm- 2. Murray-Clay et al. (2009) found that at XUV fluxes over 105 erg s- 1 cm- 2, relevant for many hot Jupiters, mass loss be- comes radiation/recombination-limited and highly inefficient. However, at the lower XUV fluxes relevant for the Kepler-11 system mass loss is roughly linear with FXUV and has efficien- cies ∼ 0.1- 0.3. For this work, we assume a default efficiency of ǫ = 0.1±0.1 0.05, although we do examine the effects of lower efficiencies. While we predominantly investigate the loss of 4 H/He envelopes, in some limited cases for Kepler-11b, we also assume this holds for steam envelope loss. One important implication from equation (2) is that mass loss rates are much higher when planets are young. This is due to two reasons. Planetary radii are considerably larger due to residual heat from formation. Moreover, at 100 Myr FXUV was ≈ 500 times higher than it is currently (Ribas et al. 2005). As a result, most of the mass loss happens in a planet's first Gyr. Thus although a planet's envelope may be stable to- day, its composition may have changed significantly since for- mation. Likewise, a considerable amount of mass will be lost between the end of planet formation at ∼ 10 Myr (Calvet et al. 2002) and 100 Myr. Following the x-ray observations of Jackson et al. (2011), we assume that at ages younger than 100 Myr the stellar XUV flux saturates and is constant at the 100 Myr value. Unfortunately, the observations for 10-100 Myr do not cover the EUV (100-1200 Å) part of the spec- trum, so there is some uncertainty as to whether this saturation age is uniform across the entire XUV spectrum. Nonetheless, our constraints on the formation of Kepler-11 in sections 3.2 and 5.1 come from the lower limits we are able to place on the initial compositions. Assuming that the EUV saturates along with the x-rays is conservative assumption in terms of the amount of mass that is lost. In general, models of LMLD planets that assume H/He en- velopes today will predict much larger mass loss histories then models that assume steam envelopes. Partly, this is because the lower mean molecular weight of hydrogen. Mostly, how- ever, it is because when we integrate the compositions back in time from the present, the addition of a small amount of H/He has much larger impact on a planet's radius than a small amount of water. A larger radius in the past in turn means a higher mass loss rate; and so the integrated mass loss history becomes much more substantial for H/He envelopes. 3. APPLICATION TO KEPLER-11 3.1. Current Compositions from Thermal Evolution The first step in trying to understand the formation and his- tory of a planetary system is to identify the possible current compositions for each of the planets in the absence of any mass loss. This then gives us estimates for the current masses of each planet's core, which we then use as the starting point for all of our calculations with mass loss. Figure 1 shows the Kepler-11 planets in a mass-radius diagram along with curves for different possible com- positions. For all planets, we color-code by the inci- dent bolometric flux they receive. The Kepler-11 plan- ets are shown by filled circles with identifying letters next to each one. The other known transiting exoplan- ets in this mass and radius range are shown by the open squares. In order of increasing radius, these are Kepler-10b (Batalha et al. 2011), Kepler-36b (Carter et al. 2012), CoRoT- 7b (Léger et al. 2009; Queloz et al. 2009; Hatzes et al. 2011), Kepler-20b (Fressin et al. 2011; Gautier et al. 2011), Kepler- 18b (Cochran et al. 2011), 55 Cancri e (Winn et al. 2011; Demory et al. 2011), GJ 1214b (Charbonneau et al. 2009), Kepler-36c (Carter et al. 2012), Kepler-30b (Fabrycky et al. 2012; Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2012), and GJ 3470b (Bonfils et al. 2012). Lastly, the open triangles show the four planets in our own solar system that fall in this range: Venus, Earth, Uranus, and Neptune. The curves show various possible compositions. The solid black curve shows a standard Earth-like composition with 2/3 rock and 1/3 iron as described in Section 2.1. The other curves show compositions with thick water or H/He envelopes atop an Earth-like core. These curves include thermal evolution without mass loss to 8 Gyr, the age of Kepler-11. The blue dashed curves show the results for 50% and 100% water- worlds computed at Teq = 700 K, approximately the average temperature of the five inaner planets. Likewise, the dot- ted orange curves show the results for H/He envelopes; how- ever, here each curve is tailored to match a specific Kepler-11 planet and is computed at the flux of that planet. These fits are listed in greater detail in table 1. Here we list the mass of each planet taken from Lissauer et al. (2011a); the H/He fractions needed to match each planet's current radius for a water-poor super-Earth model; the water fraction needed to match Kepler-11b as a water-world; and the H/He fractions needed to fit Kepler-11c, d, e, and f as sub-Neptunes with an intermediate water layer, as described in Section 2.1. As de- scribed in section 3.2, we varied the planetary albedo, the heat capacity of the rocky core, and the observed mass, radius, cur- rent age, and incident flux. Figure 1 and table 1 clearly show the degeneracy between various compositions that we are attempting to untangle. There are now four planets including Kepler-11b that can eas- ily be fit either as water-worlds or as water-rich sub-Neptunes with < 2% of their mass in H/He. However, it is worth look- ing closer at Kepler-11b in particular. It is this the only planet in the system which does not require any hydrogen or helium to match its current radius, although it must have some sort of volatile envelope. Moreover, it is also the most irradiated and it is fairly low gravity. As a result, adding a small amount of hydrogen to its current composition has a large impact on the bulk density, which in turn makes the planet more vul- nerable to mass loss, as seen in Eq. (2). A clearer picture for this planet emerges when including XUV driven mass-loss and relatively strong constraints from formation models dis- cussed in Section 5.1. Thus, if there is hope of using mass loss to constrain the composition and formation of the system, it likely lies with Kepler-11b. 3.2. Mass Loss for a Super-Earth Scenario Now that we have estimates for the present day compo- sitions, we will begin considering the effects of mass loss. We will compute mass loss histories that when evolved to the present day, match the current mass and composition. This then tells us what the mass would have to be in the past to result in the current mass and composition. As discussed in Section 2.3, there is uncertainty in stellar XUV fluxes ages younger than 100 Myr; as a result, we will present results both at 10 Myr and 100 Myr after planet formation. First we will consider water-poor super-Earth models for each planet, which have H/He envelopes atop Earth-like rocky cores. As discussed in Section 2.3, H/He envelopes are par- ticularly susceptible to mass loss. As an example, Figure 2 shows four possible cooling histories for Kepler-11b. The solid lines show thermal evolution without any mass loss while the dashed lines include mass loss. The orange curves are for water-poor super-Earth models, while the blue curves show water-world models. The red cross shows the current radius and age of Kepler-11b. These curves illustrate the im- pacts of both thermal evolution and mass loss on the radius of a low-mass planet. The water-world models require that 40% of the current mass must be in water to match the current radius. Assuming our standard efficiency ǫ = 0.1, implies an initial composition of 43% water at 10 Myr. This illustrates TABLE 1 CURRENT MASS AND COMPOSITION 5 % Water % H/He 3-layer 0.1 % n/a 0.3±1.0 1.3±0.9 5.5±2.3 0.4±0.6 0.8 % 3.0 % 0.2 % Planet Current Mass (M⊕) Kepler-11b Kepler-11c Kepler-11d Kepler-11e Kepler-11f 2.0 6.1 4.3±2.2 13.5±4.8 6.1±3.1 8.4±2.5 2.3±2.2 1.7 1.9 1.2 % H/He 0.3±1.1 4.6±2.7 8.2±2.7 2.4 % 17.2±4.1 4.1±1.8 1.5 % 4.2 % 29 % 0.25 % 40±41 n/a 2.3 % n/a n/a n/a NOTE. -- Present day masses and compositions for Kepler-11 for three classes of models. The first two columns list each planet along with the observed mass derived from TTV in Lissauer et al. (2011a). The third column lists the current H/He fractions predicted by our thermal evolution models assuming a two layer H/He on rock/iron or water-poor "super-Earth" model. The fourth column shows the predicted water fraction for a two layer steam on rock/iron model or "water- world." This is only applicable to 11b as the other are all less dense than pure water. The final column lists the predicted fraction of H/He for three layer "sub- Neptune" models with equal mass in the rock and water layer. This scenario is not applicable to 11b since it only needs 40% water to match its radius. RESULTS FROM MASS LOSS: MASS AND COMPOSITION FOR SUPER-EARTHS TABLE 2 Planet Mass 100 Myr (M⊕) % H/He 100 Myr Mass 10 Myr (M⊕) % H/He 10 Myr Kepler-11b Kepler-11c Kepler-11d Kepler-11e Kepler-11f 28.2 5.8 34.6±6.5 13.7±4.7 6.7±2.8 8.8±2.3 3.1±5.2 0.6 1.6 0.2 85.4 % 3.2 % 87.6±6.6 6.0±5.0 16.5±22 21.2±6.0 29±58 24 % 8.5 % 3.2 % 10.1 3.1 44.8±9.7 14.2±4.3 7.8±12.8 9.7±2.5 3.4±6.6 0.8 0.4 1.9 8.2 % 90.4±5.1 9.1±28 7.3 % 28±56 17 % 28.1±10.5 35±57 25 % 7.7 % NOTE. -- Masses and H/He fractions predicted by coupled mass loss and thermal evolution models at 100 and 10 Myr, assuming all five planets are water-poor super-Earths. The large error bars on some compositions are due mostly to uncertainties in the current masses from TTV. The 10 Myr values are subject to some model uncertainties as discussed in sections 2.2 and 2.3. Kepler-11b is extremely vulnerable to H/He mass loss and would have to start off implausibly massive to retain a small H/He envelope today. For the best-fit masses, Kepler-11c is less vulnerable to mass loss due to its massive core. However, Kepler-11c, d, e, and f are all consistent with have formed with ∼30% H/He. the relative stability of water envelopes. On the other hand, the dashed orange curve shows the vulnerability of H/He lay- ers. Here we have assumed a efficiency 5× lower ǫ = 0.02 and yet more mass is lost than in the water-world scenario. Even at this low efficiency, Kepler-11b would have to initially be 11% H/He and 4.8 M⊕ to retain the 0.3% needed to match the current radius. This also shows the large increase in radius that can result from even a relatively modest increase in the H/He mass. Table 2 summarizes the results for Kepler-11 b-f for the water-poor super-Earth scenario. We list the masses predicted by our models when the planets were 10 and 100 Myr old. In addition, we list the fraction of the planets' masses in the H/He envelope at each age. These results are further illus- trated in Figure 4a. Here we have plotted the mass and H/He fraction for each planet at 10 Myr, 100 Myr, and today. Each color corresponds to a particular planet with the squares in- dicating the current masses and compositions, the circles the results at 100 Myr, and the triangles the results at 10 Myr. In order to calculate the uncertainty on these results, we varied the mass loss efficiency ǫ from 5-20% and varied the XUV photosphere from 0.1-10 nbar. Likewise, we varied the plan- etary Bond albedo from 0-0.80 and varied the heat capacity of the rocky core from 0.5-1.0 Jg- 1 K- 1. Also, as discussed in section 2.2, we varied the initial entropy for the 10 Myr models, to account for undertainties in "hot-start" vs. "cold- start". Finally, we factored in the observed uncertainties in mass, radius, and incident flux. Clearly, Kepler-11b is vulnerable to extreme mass loss if it has a H/He envelope atop a rock/iron core. Although less than 1% H/He today, if it is a water-poor super-Earth it could have been have over ∼ 90% H/He in the past. At 10 Myr, its mass would have been 45 ± 10 M⊕, an order of magnitude higher than the current value. Kepler-11b is able to undergo such extreme mass loss because its high XUV flux and the low mass of its rocky core put it in a regime where it is possible 6 to enter a type of runaway mass loss. This happens when the mass loss timescale is significantly shorter then the cooling timescale. After the planet initially loses mass it has an inte- rior adiabat and rocky core that are significantly hotter than would otherwise be expected for a planet of its mass and age. This is because the interior still remembers when the planet was more massive and has not had sufficient time to cool. As a result, the planet will stay inflated for some time and the den- sity stays roughly constant and can actually decrease. A simi- lar effect was seen by Baraffe et al. (2004) when they studied coupled thermal evolution and mass loss models for core-less hot Jupiters. We find that this process generally shuts off once the composition drops below ∼20% H/He. At that point the presence of the core forces the total radius to shrink even if the planet is unable to cool efficiently. Figure 3 shows this process as Kepler-11b loses mass for three different values of its current mass and therefore its core mass. The curves cor- respond to the best fit mass from transit-timing as well as the 1σ error bars. This shows that the timing of this runaway loss event depends strongly on the mass of the rock/iron core. Super-Earth models of Kepler-11b are unusual in that they are subject to tremendous mass loss and yet they retain a small amount of H/He today. Typically models that start out ∼ 90% H/He either experience runaway mass loss and lose their H/He envelopes completely, or they never enter the runaway regime and remain over 50% H/He. The uncertainty in the initial composition of Kepler-11b is due to uncertainty in its TTV mass. At a given current mass, the range of Kepler-11b mod- els that will retain an envelope that is < 1% H/He is extremely narrow. In this sense, the current composition of Kepler-11b requires a rare set of initial conditions if it is a water-poor super-Earth. Counterintuitively, if Kepler-11b is more massive today then its implied mass in the past is actually lower. This is be- cause a higher mass today would imply a more massive core, which would increase the planet's density and decrease its mass loss rate. As a result, a more massive model for Kepler- 11b today is less vulnerable to mass loss and so less H/He is needed in the past in order to retain 0.3% today. At 100 Myr, there is a very large uncertainty in the composition due to the uncertainty in the core mass. However, even if we assume the 1σ error bar 6.5 M⊕, Kepler-11b would still be at least 37 M⊕ and at least 83% H/He at 10 Myr. In section 5.1, we will com- pare this to models of in situ formation and show that such a scenario is unlikely. On the other hand, Kepler-11c is not particularly vulnerable to mass loss, at least using the best fit mass from transit tim- ing, despite having the second highest flux in system. This is because of the relatively large mass of its rocky core; the high gravity means additional H/He has a more modest effect of the planet's radius and therefore on the mass loss rate. In fact, along with the incident XUV flux the mass of the rocky core is the single largest factor that determines whether a given planet will be vulnerable to mass loss. As a result, the dom- inant sources of uncertainty in our mass loss models are the uncertainties in the masses from TTV. These dominate over all the theoretical uncertainties in the thermal evolution and mass loss models. The uncertainty in planet mass from transit timing is particular large for Kepler-11c. If its mass is close to the 1σ low value, then it is possible Kepler-11c has un- dergone more substantial mass loss similar to Kepler-11d-f. Fortunately, as more quarters of data are processed the mass estimates from TTV will become more precise (Agol et al. 2005; Holman & Murray 2005). Finally, Kepler-11d, e, and f are modestly vulnerable to mass loss and are consistent with having originated with ∼ 20% H/He at 100 Myr and ∼ 30% H/He at 10 Myr. In Section 5.2 we will discuss these results in terms of orbital stability. 3.3. The Water-Rich Scenario Next we consider a water-rich scenario where the entire system formed beyond the snow line. We assume that Kepler- 11c-f are water-rich sub-Neptunes as described in Section 2.1, while Kepler-11b is currently a water-world. Otherwise the thermal mass loss histories are calculated in the same man- ner as the water-poor super-Earth scenario. For Kepler-11c- f we calculate the planet mass H/He fraction at 10 and 100 Myr, assuming that only H/He is lost. For Kepler-11b, we examine the vulnerability of both H/He and steam envelopes atop water-rich interiors. The results are summarized in Ta- ble 3 which list the water fraction for a water-world model of Kepler-11b and the H/He fraction for water-rich sub-Neptune models of Kepler-11c-f. Likewise, the results for c-f are shown in Figure 4b. In general, these three layer models are slightly more vul- nerable to mass loss than the water-poor super-Earth models presented in section 3.2. Mostly this is because models with a water layer have hotter interiors that cool more slowly. Since models For example, for Kepler-11c without mass loss the models presented in Table 1, at 8 Gyr the final entropy in the H/He layer is 6.6 kb/baryon for the water-rich sub-Neptune model versus 5.8 for the water-poor super-Earth model. The second reason is that counter-intuitively the water-rich sub- Neptune models are slightly more vulnerable to mass loss pre- cisely because they have less of the planet's mass in H/He to- day. For a planet that has less H/He today, adding a small amount of H/He at the margin has a larger impact on the planet's radius and therefore on the mass loss rate. For Kepler-11c-f the results are broadly similar to the those for the water-poor super-Earth scenario. Kepler-11c is again the least vulnerable to mass loss; while Kepler-11d is again the most vulnerable of the four planets that we model as water-rich sub-Neptunes. However, all four of these planets are consistent with having been ∼ 10 - 20% H/He at 100 Myr and ∼ 20 - 30% H/He at 10 Myr. If Kepler-11b was always a water-world, then mass loss was never important for it. Between 10 Myr and the present, it only drops from 43% to 40% water. Moreover, if Kepler- 11b was initially a water-rich sub-Neptune similar to the other planets in the system, it could have easily stripped its H/He outer envelope. If we start Kepler-11b at 100 Myr as a water- rich sub-Neptune similar to the other planets with 30% H/He atop 4.3 M⊕ of rock and water, then assuming ǫ = 0.1 the entire H/He envelope will be stripped by 300 Myr. We can set upper limits on the initial mass and H/He fraction of 70 M⊕ and 94% if Kepler-11b was originally a water-rich sub- Neptune. These are however strictly upper limits, a H/He layer could have been lost at any time between formation and now. Therefore, all five planets are consistent with a scenario is which they formed as water-rich sub-Neptunes with ∼ 10% H/He at 100 Myr and ∼ 20% H/He at 10 Myr. 4. A MASS LOSS THRESHOLD FOR LOW-MASS LOW-DENSITY PLANETS Although Kepler-11 provides a unique case-study, it is es- sential to explore how mass loss impacts the larger population of LMLD transiting planets. Figure 5 shows the bolomet- ric flux these planets receive at the top of their atmospheres RESULTS FROM MASS LOSS: WATER-WORLDS AND SUB-NEPTUNES TABLE 3 Planet Mass 100 Myr (M⊕) Composition 100 Myr Mass 10 Myr (M⊕) Composition 10 Myr 7 Kepler-11b Kepler-11c Kepler-11d Kepler-11e Kepler-11f 2.0 4.6 4.4±2.2 13.7±4.8 6.8±2.8 9.1±2.1 2.9±3.8 1.2 2.0 0.5 1.4 % 28 % 41±39 1.8±18 11.6±17 12.8±4.6 21±62 17 % 8.7 % 6.7 % 1.2 1.8 4.5±2.1 15.2±25 7.6±7.6 9.7±2.6 4.0±4.9 1.5 0.9 2.0 29 % 10 % 43±38 12±70 21±49 18±12 43±44 10 % 10 % 36 % NOTE. -- Masses and volatile fractions predicted by coupled mass loss and thermal evolution models at 100 and 10 Myr, assuming Kepler-11c, d, e, and f are water-rich sub-Neptunes and Kepler-11b is a water- world. Thus the compositions listed for Kepler-11b are water fractions, while those for Kepler-11c-f are H/He fractions. Kepler-11c-f are all consistent with having formed as water-rich sub-Neptunes with 20-30% H/He. Kepler-11b is not vulnerable to mass loss if it has a water envelope; however, it could have easily also formed a water-rich sub-Neptune and lost its H/He envelope. vs. their bulk densities. As in Figure 1, filled circles show the Kepler-11 planets with the letters indicating each planet. Likewise, the open squares show the other transiting exoplan- ets that are less than 15 Earth masses. For reference, we have also plotted all other transiting planets between 15 and 100 M⊕ as gray crosses (Wright et al. 2011). The colors indi- cate possible compositions. All planets with a best-fit mass and radius that lies below a pure rock curve are colored red. These include Kepler-10b, Kepler-36b, CoRoT-7b, and just barely Kepler-20b. Planets that are less dense than pure rock but more dense than pure water, indicating that the could po- tentially be water-worlds, are colored blue. These include Kepler-11b, Kepler-18b, and 55 Cancri e. Meanwhile those planets that must have a H/He envelope to match their radius are colored orange. These include Kepler-11c, d, e, and f, Kepler-30b, Kepler-36c, GJ 1214b, and GJ 3470b. The dashed black lines show curves of constant mass loss rate according to equation (2), assuming ǫ = 0.1 and Ktide = 1. These curves are linear in this plot since the instantaneous mass loss rate goes as the flux over the density. Although Fig- ure 5 plots the bolometric flux today, we can relate this to an XUV flux at a given time using the Ribas et al. (2005) power law for sun-like stars described in Section 2.3. The curves show the flux today required to lose mass at 1 M⊕ Gyr- 1 when the planets were 1 Gyr old and 100 Myr old, along with an- other curve showing 0.1 M⊕ Gyr- 1 at 100 Myr. Since most of the mass loss happens in the first few hundred Myrs, the bot- tom two curves can roughly be considered as the respective thresholds for mass loss being important and being unimpor- tant for LMLD planets. One possible explanation of this mass loss threshold is that it caused by XUV driven mass loss from H/He envelopes on low-mass planets. LMLD planets that form above the 100 Myr 1 M⊕ Gyr- 1 curve lose mass, increase in density and move to the right until they lie below this threshold. The planets that are left above this line are mostly rocky or at the very least probably do not have H/He envelopes. Planets more massive than ∼ 15 M⊕ are not affected since they have a larger reservoir of mass and the loss of a few earth masses of volatiles isn't sufficient to significantly change their bulk density. To illustrate this, we have plotted our predictions for the bulk densities of each of the Kepler-11 planets at 100 Myr, including the effects of both mass loss and thermal evolution. These are indicated by the shadowed letters at the left of Fig- ure 5. The situation becomes even clearer if we instead we plot flux against mass times density as in Figure 6. The timescale for XUV mass loss goes like ρMp/FXUV, so lines in this di- agram are constant mass loss timescales. Now the thresh- old is much clearer and applies to all planets up to all plan- ets with H/He envelopes. This also removes any effects from the somewhat arbitrary 15 M⊕ cut.The sparsity of planets at low flux and high density is almost certainly a selection effect, since these are likely to be planets with long periods and small radii. However, the interesting result is that there is appears to be a critical mass loss timescale above which we do not find any planets with H/He envelopes. In particular, all five of the inner Kepler-11 planets lie nicely along this threshold. More- over, of the three planets that lie above the critical mass loss timescale, two are likely rocky. tloss = Mp M = GM2 p pFXUV,E100 πǫR3 F⊕ Fp (5) The dashed black line in Figure 6 shows our best fit for this critical mass loss timescale. Equation 5 defines this mass loss timescale. Here ǫ = 0.1 is the mass loss efficiency, FXUV,E100 = 504 erg s- 1 cm- 2 is the XUV flux at the Earth when it was 100 Myr old, and Fp is the current incident bolometric flux at a planet. We find a best fit with tloss,crit ≈ 12 Gyr. How- ever, while equation 5 accounts for the higher XUV fluxes at earlier times, it does not include the effects of larger radii at formation. The will reduce tloss by at least another order of magnitude. Unfortunately, loss (2007). A similar mass threshold was proposed by that Lecavelier Des Etangs time there were relatively few transiting planets and no known transiting super-Earths. As a result, the authors we mostly limited to hot Jupiters from radial velocity surveys and were forced to use a scaling law to estimate radii. Here we are able to confirm the existence of a mass loss threshold and extend it all the way down to ∼ 2 M⊕. This mass loss threshold could also help explain features in occurrence rate of planets found by Kepler. Howard et al. (2011) found that the frequency of 2-4 R⊕ Kepler planet can- didates dropped off exponentially for periods within 7 days. at 8 This 7 day cutoff corresponds to an incident bolometric flux of 200 F⊕. There are five planets with measured densities in figure 5 that lie above 200 F⊕. Of these five, three planets are consistent with being rocky and two with being water- worlds; none of the five requires a H/He atmosphere to match its observed mass and radius. If all low mass planets orbiting within 7 days lose their H/He atmospheres, then their radii will shrink from 2-4 R⊕ to <2 R⊕. This could naturally ex- plain the drop off in 2-4 R⊕ candidates at short periods. 4.1. Reproducing the Mass Loss Threshold In order to fully examine whether the mass loss threshold in Figure 5 can be explained by atmospheric mass loss, we per- formed a small parameter study with ∼800 mass loss models across a wide range of initial masses, compositions, and in- cident fluxes. For each model we ran thermal evolution and mass loss starting at 10 Myr around a Sun-like star. We ran models with initial masses of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 M⊕. We assumed water-poor super-Earth compositions, meaning H/He envelopes on top Earth-like cores, with initial compo- sitions of 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 40% H/He. Finally we varied the incident bolometric flux from 10 to 1000 F⊕, in order to cover the range of observed planets in Figures 5 and 6. We then recorded the resulting masses, densities, and composi- tions at various ages. The results are shown in Figure 7. As in Figure 6, each panel plots the total incident flux at the top of the atmosphere vs. the planet mass times density assuming different mass loss histories for our full suite of models. The size of each point indicates the mass of the planet, while the color indicates the fraction of its mass in the H/He envelope. The top left panel shows the initial distribution at 10 Myr before we start any mass loss. The other two top panels show the results at 100 Myr and 10 Gyr for our standard mass loss efficiency ǫ = 0.1. Meanwhile, the bottom panels show the results at 1 Gyr for a range of different efficiencies. These range from highly inef- ficient mass loss ǫ = 0.01, to our standard efficiency ǫ = 0.1, and finally extremely efficient mass loss ǫ = 1. In each panel, as planets cool and lose mass the points move to the right, shrink, and become bluer (less H/He). For reference, we have re-plotted our critical mass loss timescale from Figure 6 in each of the result panels. As we can see, models with mass loss do in general re- sult in a threshold roughly corresponding to a critical mass loss timescale. Moreover, the mass loss threshold observed in Figure 5 is well reproduced by mass loss models with ǫ ≈ 0.1. This is similar to the efficiencies found by detailed models of mass loss from hot Jupiters in the energy-limited regime (Murray-Clay et al. 2009). This suggests that our assumption of comparable mass loss efficiencies for LMLD planets is rea- sonable. It is also apparent that the threshold already in place by 100 Myr, and subsequent evolution has a relatively minor effect. We also examined the effect of beginning our param- eter study at 100 rather than 10 Myr; however, this did not significantly affect the location of the threshold. Previous mass loss evolution models (e.g., Hubbard et al. 2007b,a; Jackson et al. 2011; Owen & Jackson 2012) have also predicted mass loss thresholds. However, our models are the first to fully include the effects of coupled mass loss and thermal evolution for LMLD planets. We are able confirm and explain the observed threshold seen in Figure 6 in a region of parameter space where most of the Kepler planets are being found. 4.2. Constraints On Mass and Radius for the General Population If we use the critical mass loss timescale curve from Figure 6 as a approximation for the observed mass loss threshold, then we can write down a simple expression for the thresh- old. This is shown in equation (6), which is valid for plan- ets around Sun-like stars with Fp < 500 F⊕. The 500 F⊕ cut excludes highly irradiated rocky planets like Kepler-10b and CoRoT-7b. These planets may have once had volatiles in the past, but they are likely rocky today and so H/He mass loss is no longer relevant. This cut also excludes the region where energy-limited escape breaks down and mass loss becomes ra- diation and recombination limited (Murray-Clay et al. 2009) ρMp ≥ 3ǫFXUV,E100 4G Fp F⊕ tloss,crit (6) The exciting implication of equation (6) is that we can use it to obtain lower limits on mass for the much larger population of Kepler super-Earths and sub-Neptunes for which we do not have measured densities. This will help identify promising targets for follow-up work with radial velocity observations. This is shown in equation (7). Mp ≥s πǫFXUV,E100 G Fp F⊕ tloss,crit R3/2 p (7) Table 4 applies equation (7) to a list of Kepler candi- dates smaller than 4 R⊕ that are well suited to radial-velocity follow-up. We excluded any planets with Fp > 500 F⊕, since equation (7) is not valid in that regime. Also, we limited the sample to only those planets with minimum radial veloc- ity semi-amplitudes Kmin > 1.0 m s- 1 around stars with Ke- pler magnitude brighter than 13, since these will be the most promising for RV follow-up. In the end, this leaves us with a list of 38 likely detectable targets, eight of which (KOIs 104.01, 107.01, 123.01, 246.01, 262.02, 288.01, 984.01, and 1241.02) have Kmin > 2.0 m s- 1. Finally, we can also use the mass loss threshold to find an upper limit on the radii of non-transiting planets from radial velocity surveys with Fp < 500 F⊕. This is done in equation (8). Rp ≤ ( G πǫFXUV,E100tloss,crit F⊕ Fp )1/3M2/3 p (8) 5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Kepler-11: Comparison to Formation Models, Implications for Migration By itself, the constraints from mass loss do not tell us whether Kepler-11 is a system of water-poor super-Earths or water-rich sub-Neptunes. Instead we need to compare our es- timates of the initial compositions to models of planet forma- tion. By doing so we can examine whether our estimates of the original compositions for a water-poor super-Earth sce- nario are consistent with the maximum H/He fraction that can be accreted during in situ formation. Ikoma & Hori (2012) examine the accretion of H/He atmo- spheres onto the rocky cores of hot water-poor super-Earths. In particular, they examine the in situ formation of the Kepler- 11 system. In addition to a planet's core mass and tempera- ture, the amount of H/He accreted will depend strongly on the lifetime and dust grain opacity of the accretion disk. As with thermal evolution, the need to cool the rocky core can slow the contraction of the accreting atmosphere and limit the final H/He fraction. They are able to set hard upper limits on the initial compositions for in situ formation by assuming a grain- free, long-lived (∼ 1 Myr in the inner 0.2 AU) accretion disk and ignoring the delay in accretion due to cooling the core. In particular, Ikoma & Hori (2012) find that Kepler-11b could not have accreted more than 10% of its mass in H/He if it formed in situ. Moreover, using a more typical disk life- time of 105 yr (Gorti et al. 2009) and including the effect of cooling the core implies that Kepler-11b was < 1% H/He at formation. On the other hand, in Table 2 we showed that ther- mal evolution and mass loss models predict that if Kepler-11b is a water-poor super-Earth then it was 87±7 85 % and at least 82% at 10 Myr. Combined with the results of Ikoma & Hori (2012), this disfavors in situ formation of Kepler-11b. This result appears robust to any uncertainties in thermal evolution or mass loss models. Even if we only look after the period of run-away mass loss, at 3 Gyr Kepler-11b was still 10% H/He, the maximum allowed by Ikoma & Hori (2012). Likewise, we find that Kepler-11f was at least 10% H/He at 10 Myr, even though the Ikoma & Hori (2012) models predict that it cannot have accreted its current composition of 4% H/He if it formed in situ. Furthermore, the co-planar, tightly packed, circular orbits in the system strongly suggest that it could have un- dergone type 1 migration (Ida & Lin 2010). As a result, we disfavor in situ formation of the system. If the Kepler-11 system did not form at its current loca- tion, then one possibility is that it formed at or beyond the snow-line and then Type 1 migrated to it is current location (Rogers et al. 2011). If this is the case, then it is likely a system of water-rich sub-Neptunes and water-worlds as dis- cussed in Section 3.3. As we showed in Section 3.3, Kepler- 11b is very stable to mass-loss if it is a water-world. If it was initially a water-rich sub-Neptune, it could have easily lost its H/He layer in the first few 100 Myr. Likewise, Kepler-11c-f are all consistent having formed as water-rich sub-Neptunes with ∼ 20% of their mass in H/He. The other possibility is that Kepler-11 is a system of water- poor super-Earths that has nonetheless undergone significant migration. For a grain-free accretion disk that lasts 106 yr at 550 K, the critical mass for run-away accretion drops to 5 M⊕ (Ikoma & Hori 2012). This implies that Kepler-11b could possibly have formed as a water-poor super-Earth at or be- yond the current orbit of 11f. Nonetheless, this assumes a completely grain-free long-lived disk, which may not be real- istic. Furthermore, this scenario still requires that Kepler-11b was ∼90% H/He when it formed, while all the other planets in the system are consistent with more modest initial com- positions. As a result, we favor the water-rich sub-Neptune scenario. 5.2. Kepler 11: Mass Loss and Orbital Stability One possible result of significant mass loss is that it could impact the orbital stability of closely packed multi-planet sys- tems like Kepler-11. Although this system is stable in its cur- rent configuration, it might not be with the initial masses de- termined by our models. One relatively simple stability check is to calculate the separation between pairs of planets in terms of their mutual Hill spheres. Figure 8 plots the separation in mutual Hill spheres (∆) between adjacent pairs of planets at both 10 Myr and the present, assuming a water-poor super- Earth composition. 9 p Smith & Lissauer (2009) found that systems with five or more planets tended to de-stabilize when ∆ < 9. This threshold is shown as dashed gray lines in figure 8. Al- though Kepler-11b-c currently lies well below this threshold, Lissauer et al. (2011a) showed that the system is nevertheless stable today because planets b and c are dynamically decou- pled from the other four planets and so act more like a two planet system. For two planet systems the absolute minimum stable separation is ∆ = 2√3 = 3.46 (Gladman 1993). This second stability threshold is shown by the dotted lines in fig- ure 8. The Hill radius goes as M1/3 , as a result the change in ∆ from mass loss is relatively modest; nonetheless, the stability of the system is in danger. At 10 Myr, Planets d-e do lie be- low the approximate ∆ > 9 stability threshold; however, both pairs on either side of d-e are still relatively stable which may help stabilize the system. More importantly, the separation of planets b-c at 10 Myr skirts dangerously close, ∆ = 3.8±0.5 0.4, to the critical ∆ > 2√3 stability threshold. More detailed mod- eling needs to be done to assess the impact of mass loss on orbital stability; nonetheless, the ∆ > 2√3 stability threshold provides another strong reason to be skeptical of a water-poor super-Earth scenario for Kepler-11b. The major caveat to this stability analysis is that we assume that all of the orbits are stationary even as the planets lose mass. This is motivated by Adams (2011), which showed that in the presence of a modest planetary magnetic field XUV driven mass loss from hot Jupiters tends to come out along the magnetic poles. Assuming that the magnetic field is suf- ficiently strong, dipolar, and perpendicular to the plane of the orbit, then mass loss won't have any impact on the orbit. In general however, the directionality of mass loss will be an ex- tremely complicated problem determined by the interaction of the ionized hydrodynamic wind, the planetary magnetic field, and the stellar wind. Boué et al. (2012) showed that if the mass loss is directed in the plane of the orbit, then it can have a significant impact on both semi-major axis and eccentricity. 5.3. Future Work Further confirmation of the mass loss threshold will de- pend on getting reliable mass estimates for more LMLD planets. Fortunately, there is a large population of super- Earth sized planets in multi-planet systems found by Kepler (Lissauer et al. 2011b). For some of these systems TTV can be used to determine masses (Agol et al. 2005). Moreover, this will become possible for more systems as more quarters of data are collected. Likewise, as more quarters of transit data are analyzed, previous mass constraints from TTV will become more precise. For Kepler-11 this will allow tighter constraints on both the current and past compositions. In order to better understand mass loss, there is also a strong need to acquire more XUV observations of young (∼ 10 Myr) stars. Currently the best estimates of EUV fluxes are for G and K stars older than 100 (Ribas et al. 2005; Sanz-Forcada et al. 2010). Meanwhile, planet for- mation ends and mass loss becomes important after a few Myr (Calvet et al. 2002; Alexander et al. 2006). A large amount of planetary mass will be lost in the first 100 Myr and this will depend strongly on the stellar XUV flux. Jackson et al. (2011) recently found that x-ray fluxes satu- rate for stars younger than 100 Myr; however, this needs to be investigated at other wavelengths. Likewise, more UV observations of transiting exospheres are needed. Cur- rently, we only have observations for a handful of hot Jupiters 10 (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004; Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2010; Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2012). More observations are needed, especially for Neptune and super-Earth sized planets. Likewise, it is also important get more observations of XUV fluxes and flares from M dwarfs, which are known to be highly active (Reiners et al. 2012). This is particularly impor- tant for super-Earths in the habitable zones of late M dwarfs where the stability of habitable atmospheres could depend on XUV driven mass loss. The three planets orbiting M-stars in figure 6 all lie an order of magnitude below the threshold for Sun-like stars. This could be due to mass loss from X- ray flares, but without a larger sample size it is impossible to say. The Recently France et al. (2012) obtained the first FUV spectrum for GJ876; however, more data are needed. Like- wise, non-equilibrium mass loss models need to be developed to understand the impact of flares. In the area of modeling mass loss, we have uti- that appears to work lized a relatively simple model well for hot Jupiters, although mass loss rates have only been constrained for HD 209458b (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2004) and HD 189733b (Lecavelier Des Etangs et al. 2010; Lecavelier des Etangs et al. 2012). On a broader scale, there may be evidence for a lost population of hot Jupiter planets at very high levels of XUV irradiation (e.g., Davis & Wheatley 2009). Since we have suggested that H/He mass loss may be more important for more modestly irradiated LMLD planets than for average hot Jupiters (since the smaller planets have much smaller H/He masses, mass loss for LMLD planets can actually transform the very structure of the planets), we en- courage further detailed models to quantitatively access mass loss from these atmospheres. 6. CONCLUSIONS In order to better understand the structure, history, and for- mation of low-mass planets, we constructed coupled thermal evolution and mass loss models of water-poor super-Earths, water-worlds, and water-rich sub-Neptunes. The Kepler-11 system represents a new class of low-mass low-density plan- ets that offers a unique test-bed for such models and gives us powerful insights on planet formation and evolution. Ap- plying this understanding more broadly, we find a relation between a planet's mass, density, and its incident flux that matches the observed population. Moreover, this threshold can help constrain the properties of hundreds of planets. Our primary conclusions are: • XUV-driven hydrogen mass loss coupled with plane- tary thermal evolution is a powerful tool in understand- ing the composition and formation of low-mass low- density planets. • A coupled model is essential for this work, due to the much larger planetary radii in the past, when XUV fluxes were significantly higher. • In situ formation of the Kepler-11 system is disfavored, instead it could be a system of water-rich sub-Neptunes that formed beyond the snow line. • If Kepler-11b is a water-poor super-Earth then it likely formed with ∼ 90% H/He beyond 0.25 AU. We believe this is unlikely and instead show that Kepler-11 b-f all could have originated as water-rich sub-Neptunes with ∼ 20% H/He initially. If this is the case, Kepler-11b could have lost its H/He envelope and become a water- world today for a wide range of initial masses and com- positions. • There is a sharp observed threshold in incident flux vs. planet density times mass above which we do not find planets with H/He envelopes. To date, low-density planets have not been found above this threshold. • This mass loss threshold is well reproduced by our cou- pled thermal evolution and mass loss models. • This threshold can be used to provide limits on planet mass or radius for the large population of low-mass low-density planets without measured densities. • In particular, we have identified promising Kepler tar- gets for RV follow-up. We would like to thank Nadine Nettelmann for help imple- menting the water EOS; also Masahiro Ikoma and Yasunori Hori for providing us their constraints from formation. EDL would like to thank Dan Fabrycky, Kevin Zahnle, Doug Lin, Eugene Chiang, James Owen, and Eliza Kempton for many helpful conversations. This research has made use of the Ex- oplanet Orbit Database and the Exoplanet Data Explorer at exoplanets.org." We acknowledge the support of NASA grant NNX09AC22G. REFERENCES Adams, F. C. 2011, ApJ, 730, 27 Agol, E., Steffen, J., Sari, R., & Clarkson, W. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 567 Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 229 Alfè, D., Price, G. D., & Gillan, M. J. 2002, Phys. Rev. B, 65, 165118 Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., & Benz, W. 2011, A&A, 526, A63 Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 Baraffe, I., Alibert, Y., Chabrier, G., & Benz, W. 2006, A&A, 450, 1221 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Selsis, F., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, A&A, 436, L47 Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., & Lammer, H. 2004, A&A, 419, L13 Batalha, N. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 27 Bean, J. L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 92 Bonfils, X., et al. 2012, ArXiv e-prints Boué, G., Figueira, P., Correia, A. C. M., & Santos, N. C. 2012, A&A, 537, Carter, J. A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 556 Charbonneau, D., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 891 Cochran, W. D., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 7 Croll, B., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Fortney, J. J., Murray, N., & Neilson, H. 2011, ApJ, 736, 78 Davis, T. A., & Wheatley, P. J. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 1012 Demory, B.-O., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A114 Désert, J.-M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, L40 Ehrenreich, D., & Désert, J.-M. 2011, A&A, 529, A136 Erkaev, N. V., Kulikov, Y. N., Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Langmayr, D., Jaritz, G. F., & Biernat, H. K. 2007, A&A, 472, 329 Fabrycky, D. C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 114 Fortney, J. J., Ikoma, M., Nettelmann, N., Guillot, T., & Marley, M. S. 2011, ApJ, 729, 32 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661 France, K., Linsky, J. L., Tian, F., Froning, C. S., & Roberge, A. 2012, Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., & Sitko, M. ArXiv e-prints L3 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008 French, M., Mattsson, T. R., Nettelmann, N., & Redmer, R. 2009, Phys. Rev. B, 79, 054107 Fressin, F., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Gautier, III, T. N., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247 Gorti, U., Dullemond, C. P., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1237 Guillot, T., Chabrier, G., Gautier, D., & Morel, P. 1995, ApJ, 450, 463 Hansen, B. M. S., & Murray, N. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Hatzes, A. P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 75 Holman, M. J., & Murray, N. W. 2005, Science, 307, 1288 Howard, A. W., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Hubbard, W. B., Hattori, M. F., Burrows, A., & Hubeny, I. 2007a, ApJ, 658, Hubbard, W. B., Hattori, M. F., Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., & Sudarsky, D. L59 2007b, Icarus, 187, 358 Hubbard, W. B., Nellis, W. J., Mitchell, A. C., Holmes, N. C., McCandless, P. C., & Limaye, S. S. 1991, Science, 253, 648 Hunten, D. M. 1982, Planet. Space Sci., 30, 773 Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2010, ApJ, 719, 810 Ikoma, M., & Hori, Y. 2012, ArXiv e-prints Jackson, A. P., Davis, T. A., & Wheatley, P. J. 2011, ArXiv e-prints Jackson, B., Miller, N., Barnes, R., Raymond, S. N., Fortney, J. J., & Greenberg, R. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 910 Kasting, J. F., & Pollack, J. B. 1983, Icarus, 53, 479 Knudson, M. D., Desjarlais, M. P., Lemke, R. W., Mattsson, T. R., French, M., Nettelmann, N., & Redmer, R. 2012, Physical Review Letters, 108, 091102 Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Bauer, S. J., & Weiss, W. W. 2003, ApJ, 598, L121 Lecavelier Des Etangs, A. 2007, A&A, 461, 1185 Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A72 Lecavelier des Etangs, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, L4 Léger, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 287 Lissauer, J. J., et al. 2011a, Nature, 470, 53 11 -- . 2011b, ApJS, 197, 8 Lyon, S. P., & Johnson, J. D. 1992 Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541 Miller-Ricci, E., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 716, L74 Miller-Ricci, E., Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1056 Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Zahnle, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 3 Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 23 Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, 2 Nettelmann, N., Holst, B., Kietzmann, A., French, M., Redmer, R., & Blaschke, D. 2008, ApJ, 683, 1217 Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. 2012, ArXiv e-prints Queloz, D., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 303 Reiners, A., Joshi, N., & Goldman, B. 2012, AJ, 143, 93 Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Güdel, M., & Audard, M. 2005, ApJ, 622, 680 Rogers, L. A., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., & Seager, S. 2011, ApJ, 738, 59 A20 Rogers, L. A., & Seager, S. 2010a, ApJ, 712, 974 -- . 2010b, ApJ, 716, 1208 Sanchis-Ojeda, R., et al. 2012, Nature, 487, 449 Sanz-Forcada, J., Ribas, I., Micela, G., Pollock, A. M. T., García-Álvarez, D., Solano, E., & Eiroa, C. 2010, A&A, 511, L8 Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713 Sekiya, M., Nakazawa, K., & Hayashi, C. 1980, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 64, 1968 Smith, A. W., & Lissauer, J. J. 2009, Icarus, 201, 381 Thompson, S. L. 1990 Valencia, D., Ikoma, M., Guillot, T., & Nettelmann, N. 2010, A&A, 516, Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, L69 Watson, A. J., Donahue, T. M., & Walker, J. C. G. 1981, Icarus, 48, 150 Winn, J. N., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, L18 Wright, J. T., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 412 Yelle, R. V. 2004, Icarus, 170, 167 MINIMUM MASSES AND DENSITIES FOR SELECTED KOI CANDIDATES TABLE 4 KepMag P (day) Fp (F⊕) Rp (R⊕) ρmin (g cm- 3) Mp,min (M⊕) Kmin (m s- 1) 12.50 12.50 11.02 12.21 12.90 12.87 12.70 12.66 12.79 12.49 12.35 12.37 12.94 10.00 10.87 10.42 11.87 11.07 11.95 10.85 80.3 3.69 5.85 10.42 2.50 8.98 7.25 9.94 7.12 4.90 11.52 6.48 12.69 5.39 6.88 9.37 16.23 11.87 19.55 343.5 403.4 209.9 233.4 130.3 301.7 220.5 409.1 436.9 108.8 461.4 227.8 404.8 308.6 491.8 177.4 154.9 192.3 3.09 1.92 2.35 3.43 3.36 3.35 3.09 2.92 1.88 1.70 2.78 2.64 3.00 2.53 2.61 2.79 3.82 2.52 3.46 0.73 3.0 2.4 1.0 1.1 0.82 1.4 1.3 3.4 4.1 1.0 2.2 1.2 2.2 1.8 2.1 0.79 1.3 0.95 3.9 3.9 5.8 7.4 7.5 5.6 7.6 5.9 4.2 3.7 3.9 7.4 6.3 6.5 5.9 8.3 8.0 4.0 7.2 1.21 1.75 1.83 1.92 4.08 1.94 2.29 1.62 1.29 1.25 1.06 2.46 1.65 2.27 1.80 2.20 1.91 1.16 1.99 KOI 70.01 70.02 85.01 94.02 104.01 105.01 107.01 110.01 115.02 117.02 122.01 123.01 124.01 246.01 257.01 262.02 277.01 280.01 281.01 12 KOI KepMag P (day) Fp (F⊕) Rp (R⊕) ρmin (g cm- 3) Mp,min (M⊕) Kmin (m s- 1) TABLE 4 -- Continued 285.01 288.01 291.02 295.01 297.01 301.01 323.01 984.01 987.01 1117.01 1220.01 1241.02 1597.01 1692.01 1781.01 1781.02 1921.01 1929.01 2067.01 11.57 11.02 12.85 12.32 12.18 12.73 12.47 11.63 12.55 12.81 12.99 12.44 12.68 12.56 12.23 12.23 12.82 12.73 12.58 13.74 10.27 8.12 5.31 5.65 6.00 5.83 4.28 3.17 11.08 6.40 10.50 7.79 5.96 7.83 3.00 16.00 9.69 13.24 180.5 433.9 247.8 339.7 482.1 399.2 166.2 259.7 404.8 327.5 441.4 485.3 423.6 175.9 61.3 219.6 172.9 251.7 347.2 3.38 3.11 2.14 1.77 1.65 1.75 2.17 3.19 1.28 2.20 1.95 3.84 2.67 2.65 3.29 1.94 3.09 2.00 2.97 0.96 1.6 2.2 3.4 4.6 3.8 1.7 1.2 6.1 2.4 3.4 1.3 2.0 1.3 0.58 2.4 1.0 2.4 1.6 6.7 9.2 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 7.4 2.3 4.7 4.6 13.3 7.2 4.6 3.7 3.2 5.7 3.6 7.6 1.61 2.14 1.25 1.22 1.25 1.17 1.21 2.91 1.03 1.13 1.52 3.17 1.86 1.61 1.38 1.63 1.28 1.11 1.69 NOTE. -- Minimum masses and densities given by equation (7) for KOI candidates selected for being promising targets for RV follow-up. In order to focus on promising candidates we cut the sample to planets with Kmin > 1.0 m s- 1 around stars with KepMag < 13. We only included planets with Fp < 500 F⊕ and Rp < 4 R⊕. This leaves us with 38 high-quality targets, eight of which have Kmin > 2.0 m s- 1. 13 FIG. 1. -- Radius vs. mass for transiting exoplanets with measured masses, along with curves for different compositions. Planets are color-coded by the incident bolometric flux they receive. Kepler-11 planets are shown by filled circles with letters indicating each planet. Other known exoplanets in this mass and radius range are shown by open squares. Solar system planets Earth, Venus, Uranus, and Neptune are shown by black letters. The solid black curve is for a Earth-like composition with 2/3 rock and 1/3 iron. All other curves use full thermal evolution calculations, assuming a volatile envelope atop a earth like core. The dashed blue curves are for 50% and 100% water by mass. The dotted orange curves are for H/He envelopes at 8 Gyr; each one is tailored to match a Kepler-11 planet and is computed at the appropriate flux and for that planet. 14 FIG. 2. -- Radius vs. time for four example model runs that match the present day mass and radius of Kepler-11b. The blue curves show water-world models, while the orange curves show water-poor super-Earth models. Dashed lines are with mass loss, while solid are without. Both water-world models and the water-poor super-Earth model without mass loss show very similar cooling curves. Even with our standard efficiency of 10% the water models undergo only minor mass loss. Meanwhile, even with an efficiency 4× smaller the H/He model undergoes substantial mass loss. This model is initially 14% H/He and 5.0 M⊕. We have marked the masses for the H/He with mass loss model at 10 Myr, 100 Myr, and 1 Gyr. This also shows the large impact on radius that even a modest (compared to Figure 3) H/He envelope can have. FIG. 3. -- Mass vs. time with mass loss for three model runs that match the present day mass along with its 1σ range for Kepler-11b. All three models assume a water-poor super-Earth composition that is 0.3% H/He today. The curves are color-coded by log density. The solid line corresponds to the best fit current mass from TTV; the dashed lines correspond to the 1σ bounds. This demonstrates several features described in the text. The initial mass is actually lower if Kepler-11b is more massive today due to a correspondingly more massive core. There is a period of runaway mass loss during which the density actually declines slightly, and the timing of this period depends strongly on the mass of the rocky core. 15 FIG. 4. -- Composition vs. mass for models of Kepler-11 with mass loss. Panel a) shows the results for water-poor super-Earth models with a H/He envelope atop a rock/iron core. Panel b) shows the results for water-rich sub-Neptune models that also have a thick water layer in between. Each point shows the % H/He and mass predicted by our thermal evolution and mass loss models at a given time. Each color indicates a particular planet as identified by the letters and connected by dashed lines. The open squares show the present day mass and composition as listed in table 1. The filled circles show the results at 100 Myr and the open triangles show the results at 10 Myr as listed in tables 2 and 3. Kepler-11b is extremely vulnerable to H/He mass loss, and would have been up to ∼ 90% H/He if it formed as a water-poor super-Earth. Kepler-11c is the least vulnerable due to its larger core mass, and d, e, and f are intermediate. All five planets are consistent with having initially been water-rich sub-Neptunes with comparable amounts of rock and water and ∼20% of their mass in H/He. 16 FIG. 5. -- Bolometric flux at the top of the atmosphere, relative to the flux incident on Earth, vs. planet density. Once again, Kepler-11 planets are shown by filled circles with letters indicating each planet. Open squares show the other extrasolar planets included in Figure 1. Colors indicate possible compositions. Planets that could be rocky are red, those that could be water-worlds are blue, and those that must have H/He are orange. For comparison, the gray crosses show all other transiting planets with measured masses greater than 15 M⊕ and less than 100 M⊕. The dashed black lines show curves of constant mass loss for different mass loss rates and ages, assuming our standard mass loss efficiency of 20%. Finally, the shaded letters at the left indicate the densities for each Kepler-11 planet at 100 Myr predicted by our mass loss evolution models in Section 3.2. 17 FIG. 6. -- Similar to Figure 5 except here we have multiplied the x-axis by planet mass. Once again, Kepler-11 planets are shown by filled circles, while open squares show the other extrasolar planets included in Figure 1. Colors indicate possible compositions. Low mass planets that could be rocky are red, those that could be water-worlds are blue, and those that must have H/He are orange. For comparison, the gray crosses show all other transiting planets with measured masses greater than 15 M⊕ and less than 100 M⊕. There is a threshold in this diagram above which there are no observed transiting planets. Moreover, this threshold corresponds to a critical mass-loss timescale (see eq. 6), as shown by the dashed black line. We discuss this threshold in the context of XUV driven mass loss in section 4. In section 4.1 and figure 7 we reproduce this threshold using our coupled thermal evolution and mass loss models. Finally in section 4.2 and table 4 we use this threshold to provide minimum masses for the broader population of Kepler candidates without measured densities. 18 FIG. 7. -- This shows the results of ∼ 1000 thermal evolution and mass loss model runs which reproduce the mass loss threshold seen in Figure 6. Each panel plots incident bolometric flux in F⊕ vs. planet density × mass for different ages and mass loss histories. Each point is sized according to its mass and colored according to its composition, assuming a H/He atmosphere atop an Earth-like core. The top left panel shows the initial distribution of the models before any mass loss has taken place. The other two top panels show results at 100 Myr and 10 Gyr for our standard mass loss efficiency (ǫ = 0.1). Meanwhile the bottom panels show the results at 1 Gyr for three different mass loss efficiencies ranging from extremely inefficient (ǫ = 0.01), to extremely efficient mass loss (ǫ = 1). As planets lose mass, the points shrink, move to the right, and become bluer. The dashed line in panels 2-6, is the same as the black dashed line in Figure 6 corresponding to critical mass loss timescale. The threshold in Figure 5 is well reproduced by models with ǫ = 0.1, which is also the approximate value implied by detailed models as discussed in Section 2.3. 19 FIG. 8. -- Separation between adjacent pairs of planets in Kepler-11, in terms of their mutual Hill spheres ∆. The x-axis shows the separations in terms of the current Hill spheres, while the y-axis shows the predicted Hill spheres when the system was 10 Myr old assuming a water-poor super-Earth scenario and that the planets remained stationary. The dashed lines show the approximate ∆ > 9 stability threshold for five planet systems from Smith & Lissauer (2009). Likewise, the dotted lines show the ∆ > 2√3 stability threshold for two planet systems from Gladman (1993). Although the d-e pair does drop below the ∆ > 9 threshold at 10 Myr, both the c-d and e-f pairs remain above it potentially stabilizing the system. More importantly, the b-c pair drops dangerously close to the ∆ > 2√3 critical threshold for dynamical stability in two-planet systems. This is another reason we disfavor a water-poor super-Earth scenario for Kepler-11b.
1109.2981	1	1109	2011-09-14T03:12:45	Dynamics of Dust Particles Released from Oort Cloud Comets and Their Contribution to Radar Meteors	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The Oort Cloud Comets (OCCs), exemplified by the Great Comet of 1997 (Hale-Bopp), are occasional visitors from the heatless periphery of the solar system. Previous works hypothesized that a great majority of OCCs must physically disrupt after one or two passages through the inner solar system, where strong thermal gradients can cause phase transitions or volatile pressure buildup. Here we study the fate of small debris particles produced by OCC disruptions to determine whether the imprints of a hypothetical population of OCC meteoroids can be found in the existing meteor radar data. We find that OCC particles with diameters D<10 um are blown out from the solar system by radiation pressure, while those with D>1 um have a very low Earth-impact probability. The intermediate particle sizes, D=100 um, represent a sweet spot. About 1% of these particles orbitally evolve by Poynting-Robertson drag to reach orbits with semimajor axis a=1 AU. They are expected to produce meteors with radiants near the apex of the Earth's orbital motion. We find that the model distributions of their impact speeds and orbits provide a good match to radar observations of apex meteors, except for the eccentricity distribution, which is more skewed toward e=1 in our model. Finally, we propose an explanation for the long-standing problem in meteor science related to the relative strength of apex and helion/antihelion sources. As we show in detail, the observed trend, with the apex meteors being more prominent in observations of highly sensitive radars, can be related to orbital dynamics of particles released on the long-period orbits.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Dynamics of Dust Particles Released from Oort Cloud Comets and Their Contribution to Radar Meteors David Nesvorn´y1, David Vokrouhlick´y1,2, Petr Pokorn´y1,2, Diego Janches3 (1) Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA (2) Institute of Astronomy, Charles University, V Holesovick´ach 2, CZ-18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic (3) Space Weather Laboratory, Code 674, GSFC/NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ABSTRACT The Oort Cloud Comets (OCCs), exemplified by the Great Comet of 1997 (Hale-Bopp), are occasional visitors from the heatless periphery of the solar sys- tem. Previous works hypothesized that a great majority of OCCs must physically disrupt after one or two passages through the inner solar system, where strong thermal gradients can cause phase transitions or volatile pressure buildup. Here we study the fate of small debris particles produced by OCC disruptions to de- termine whether the imprints of a hypothetical population of OCC meteoroids can be found in the existing meteor radar data. We find that OCC particles with diameters D . 10 µm are blown out from the solar system by radiation pressure, while those with D & 1 mm have a very low Earth-impact probability. The intermediate particle sizes, D ∼ 100 µm, represent a sweet spot. About 1% of these particles orbitally evolve by Poynting-Robertson drag to reach or- bits with semimajor axis a ∼ 1 AU. They are expected to produce meteors with radiants near the apex of the Earth's orbital motion. We find that the model distributions of their impact speeds and orbits provide a good match to radar observations of apex meteors, except for the eccentricity distribution, which is more skewed toward e ∼ 1 in our model. Finally, we propose an explanation for the long-standing problem in meteor science related to the relative strength of apex and helion/antihelion sources. As we show in detail, the observed trend, with the apex meteors being more prominent in observations of highly sensitive radars, can be related to orbital dynamics of particles released on the long-period orbits. -- 2 -- 1. Introduction The Oort cloud is a roughly spherical cloud of comets (Oort 1950), which surrounds the solar system and extends to heliocentric distances larger than 100,000 AU. The Oort cloud is currently feeding comets into the inner solar system at a rate of about 12 comets with q < 3 AU per year with an active comet absolute magnitude H10 < 10.9 (Wiegert & Tremaine 1999; q is the perihelion distance and H10 is a distance-independent measure of the active comet brightness that includes the coma). The Oort Cloud Comets (hereafter OCCs) can be divided into two populations based on their dynamical histories: (1) dynamically new OCCs, which are on their first passage through the inner solar system and typically have a & 10, 000 AU; and (2) returning OCCs which have previously passed through the inner solar system and typically have a < 10, 000 AU.1 The dynamical models of the orbital evolution of new OCCs into returning OCCs predict many times more returning comets than are observed (Wiegert & Tremaine 1999). This is the so-called "fading problem", which is thought to be related to the physical evolution of OCCs. To resolve this problem, Levison et al. (2002, hereafter L02) proposed that OCCs must physically disrupt as they evolve inward from the Oort cloud. Specifically, L02 estimated that, when a OCC becomes inactive, it has only ∼1% chance of becoming If more OCCs would become dormant, dormant, and ∼99% chance of being disrupted. L02 argued, the modern surveys of near-Earth objects would discover a greater number of dormant OCCs passing through perihelion each year than they do. Strong thermal gradients, phase transitions, and volatile pressure buildup experienced by OCCs during their approaches to the Sun are thought to be responsible for disruptions. If these results are correct, the disrupted OCCs must be a prodigious source of dust particles and larger fragments that may further disintegrate. In particular, the dust pro- duction rate from OCC disruptions should be vastly larger than that of active OCCs. On the other hand, the smallest dust particles produced in these disruption events may be lost from the Solar System due to the effects of radiation pressure, while the large fragments should be dispersed over enormous radial distances. It is therefore not clear whether the 1See Dybczynski (2001) for an alternative definition. -- 3 -- disrupted OCCs can supply a significant amount of material to the inner zodiacal cloud, and whether they could represent a significant source of interplanetary dust particles accreted by the Earth. Given their large speeds relative to the Earth, the OCC particles plunging into the upper atmosphere could produce meteor phenomena and be detected by optical and radar meteor surveys (e.g., see Steel (1996) for a review). Here we consider the radar meteors. The modern meteor radar surveys produced vast datasets including millions of high quality orbits covering both the northern and southern hemispheres (e.g., Jones & Brown 1993, Taylor & Elford 1998, Galligan & Baggaley 2004, 2005, Janches et al. 2003, Janches & Chau 2005, Chau et al. 2007, Campbell-Brown 2008). Moreover, the sensitivity of meteor observations broke new grounds with routine measurements of meteor echoes using HPLA2 radars such as the Arecibo (AO) radar, which is capable of detecting ∼50-µm particles down to ∼20 km s−1 (e.g., Janches et al. 2003, 2006, Fentzke et al. 2009). It is natural to ask whether some of these observations can be linked to the particle populations from disrupted OCCs. Meteors are produced by small interplanetary particles, also known as the meteoroids, that interact with air molecules upon atmospheric entry. Based on meteor data, the me- teoroids can be divided into two groups: sporadic meteoroids and meteoroid streams. The meteoroid streams are prominent concentrations of particles with similar orbits (Whipple & Gossner 1949, Whipple 1951). They are thought to be produced by particles released by active and recently (< few thousand years ago) disrupted comets (e.g., Jenniskens 2008). Sporadic meteoroids are those particles that have evolved significantly from their parent body so that they are no longer easily linked to that parent, or to other meteoroids from the same parent. Notably, the time-integrated flux of meteors at Earth is dominated by about a factor of ∼10 by sporadics (Jones & Brown 1993). The radiant distribution of sporadic meteors shows several concentrations on the sky known as the helion/antihelion, north/south apex, and north/south toroidal sources (e.g., Younger et al. 2009, and the references therein). Wiegert et al. (2009; hereafter W09) developed a dynamical model to explain these concentrations. Their main results concern the prominent helion/antihelion sources for which the particles released by Jupiter-Family 2High Power and Large Aperture. -- 4 -- Comets (JFCs) such as 2P/Encke provide the best match, in agreement with previous studies (e.g., Jones et al. 2001). As for the north/south apex source, W09 pointed out the potential importance of retrograde Halley-type comets (HTCs) such as 55P/Tempel-Tuttle (or an or- bitally similar lost comet). The case for the retrograde HTC particles is compelling, because three prominent retrograde HTCs, namely 1P/Halley, 55P/Tempel-Tuttle and 109P/Swift- Tuttle, all have associated streams, known as Orionids/η Aquarids, Leonids and Perseids, respectively. The sporadic meteoroids with the north/south apex radiants can thus plausibly be a dynamically old component of HTC particles. Here we consider the possibility that at least some part of the meteoroid complex is produced by disrupting OCCs (L02, see also Jones et al. 2001). We study the effects of radiation pressure on particles released from the highly-eccentric OCC orbits, and their dynamical evolution under gravitational perturbations from planets and Poynting-Robertson (P-R) drag (see Section 2 for our model). We show that a significant contribution of OCC particles to the inner zodiacal cloud and meteor record is somewhat problematic, because most small OCC particles are blown out from the solar system by radiation pressure, while most large ones get scattered by planets and never make it into the inner solar system (Section 3). Still, we find that there is a sweet spot at particle sizes ∼100-300 µm. Our modeling work shows that the orbits and impact speeds of these intermediate-size OCC particles can match those derived from the meteor radar data for apex meteoroids. Furthermore, we find that the preponderance of fast apex meteors in HPLA radar observations (e.g., AO, ALTAIR, Jicamarca) can be linked to the competing effects of P-R drag and Jupiter perturbations, which act as a size filter on populations of the long-period meteoroids (Section 4). 2. Model We studied the following sequence of events: (1) particles of different sizes were released from OCCs (Section 2.1), (2) their orbits evolved under the influence of gravitational and radiation forces (Section 2.2), (3) some particles were thermally or collisionally destroyed (Section 2.3), and (4) a small fraction of the initial particle population was accreted by Earth, producing meteors (Section 2.4). We describe our model for (1)-(4) below. -- 5 -- 2.1. Initial Orbits According to Francis (2005), OCCs have dN(q) ∝ (1 + √q) dq for q < 2 AU. For q > 2 AU, Francis' result predicts dN(q) being flat or declining while we would expect the perihelion distribution to increase with q. It probably just shows that the distribution is not well constrained for q > 2 AU. We used dN(q) ∝ 2.41(q/2)γ dq for q > 2 AU, with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1. The initial values of q in our numerical integrations were set to be uniformly random between 0 and 5 AU, because particles starting with q > 5 AU do not reach 1 AU (see Section 3.1), where they could contribute to the Earth impact record. The results for different dN(q) were obtained by assigning the appropriate weight to particles starting with different q's. Upon its release from a larger object a small particle will feel the effects of radiation pressure. These effects can be best described by replacing the mass of the Sun, m⊙, by m⊙(1 − β), with β given by β = 5.7 × 10−5 Qpr ρs , (1) where radius s and density ρ of the particle are in cgs units. Pressure coefficient Qpr can be determined using the Mie theory (Burns et al. 1979). We set Qpr = 1, which corresponds to the geometrical optics limit, where s is much larger than the incident-light wavelength. We used particles with D = 2s = 10, 30, 100, 300, 1000 µm, which should cover the interesting range of sizes, and ρ = 2.0 g cm−3. For large eccentricity e of the parent object and/or for large β, the released particle may become unbound and escape to interstellar space. To stay bound, the heliocentric distance, R, of the released particle must fulfill the following condition (e.g., Kresak 1976, Liou et al. 1999): R > R∗ = 2βa . (2) This condition shows that all particles with β released at the orbit's perihelion will be removed, if 2β > 1− e. The new OCCs have 1− e . 10−4. It follows that particles produced by a new OCC near its perihelion will become unbound for sizes up to D ∼ 1 cm. The usual near-perihelion activity of OCCs therefore cannot be a major source of small dust particles in the inner solar system. -- 6 -- Motivated by the L02 results, we now consider OCCs disruptions. Interestingly, obser- vations of the disruption events of comets show that there does not seem to be any correlation between the time of disruption and the orbital phase of the parent object. Many comets were seen to disrupt (or suffer outburst/splitting events) at large heliocentric distances. For example, 174P/Echeclus showed an outburst with R ≈ 13 AU, more than 6 AU beyond its perihelion distance (Choi et al. 2006). It may therefore be possible that OCCs could disrupt at relatively large R and produce particles that, according to Eq. (2), will stay on bound orbits. We release particles with R > R∗ in our model. For example, a D = 100-µm particle with ρ = 2.0 g cm−3 ejected from the parent comet with a = 103 AU will have β ≃ 0.006 and R∗ = 12 AU. We thus release these particles with R > 12 AU. In addition, we only study particles ejected from orbits similar to those of the returning OCCs with a ∼ 103 AU. We do not consider orbits with a & 104 AU, corresponding to the Oort spike3, because we believe it unlikely that disruptions could happen at the very large heliocentric distance implied by Eq. (2) for a & 104 AU. For example, a D = 300-µm particle with ρ = 2.0 g cm−3, released from a parent orbit with a = 104 AU, would become unbound, unless R > 36 AU. The particle populations studied here have bound initial orbits. They represent only a fraction of all particles released from OCCs. This fraction, denoted f0 in Section 4, is difficult to estimate, because we do not have a detailed understanding of the processes, and their dependence on R, that govern comet disruptions. We will return to this issue in Section 4. The initial distribution of orbital inclination vectors was set to be isotropic. To simplify things, we neglected the ejection velocities of dust particles from their parent objects (see Jones et al. 2001) and assumed that they will initially follow the parent comet's orbit modified by radiation pressure. 3The semimajor axis values of most OCCs are 104 . a . 5 × 104 AU, which is known as the Oort spike (e.g., Wiegert & Tremaine 1999). Comets in the spike are mostly dynamically new comets, on their first passage into the inner planetary system from the Oort cloud. A comet that passes through the planetary system receives a gravitational kick from the planets. The typical energy kick, ∆x, depends strongly on the perihelion distance of the comet's orbit. According to Wiegert & Tremaine (1999), ∆x ∼ 10−3 AU−1 for q . 6 AU, while comets in the Oort spike have x = 1/a . 10−4 AU−1. Depending on the sign of the kick, they will either leave the planetary system on unbound orbit, never to return, or be thrown onto a more tightly bound orbit with a . 103 AU. -- 7 -- For reference, we also followed meteoroids from 1P/Halley, 2P/Encke and 55P/Tempel- Tuttle. These comets were suggested to be important sources of the sporadic meteors by W09. The comet's orbits were obtained from JPL Horizons site. Particles of different sizes were released from the parent orbits and tracked into future. We applied the same procedures/criteria to them that we used for the OCC particles. 2.2. Orbit Integration The orbits of small particles in the interplanetary space are subject to gravitational perturbations of planets and radiation forces (Robertson 1937, Burns et al. 1979). The acceleration ~F due to radiation forces is ~F = βG m⊙ R2 " 1 − R c! ~R R − ~V c# , (3) where ~R is the heliocentric position vector of particle, ~V is its velocity, G is the gravitational constant, m⊙ is the mass of the Sun, c is the speed of light, and R = dR/dt. The acceleration (3) consists of the radiation pressure and the velocity-dependent P-R term. Parameter β is related to the radiation pressure coefficient Qpr by Eq. (1). The particle orbits were numerically integrated with the swift rmvs3 code (Levison & Duncan 1994), which is an efficient implementation of the Wisdom-Holman map (Wisdom & Holman 1991) and which, in addition, can deal with close encounters between particles and planets. The radiation pressure and drag forces were inserted into the Keplerian and kick parts of the integrator, respectively. The change to the Keplerian part was trivially done by substituting m⊙ by m⊙(1− β). The swift rmvs3 integrator is stable even for near-parabolic orbits, and thus well suited for the integrations that we carried out here. The code tracks the orbital evolution of a particle that revolves around the Sun and is subject to the gravitational perturbations of seven planets (Venus to Neptune; the mass of Mercury was added to the Sun) until the particle impacts a planet, is ejected from the Solar System or evolves to within 0.05 AU from the Sun. We removed particles that evolved to R < 0.05 AU, because the orbital period for R < 0.05 AU was not properly resolved by our 1-day integration timestep. -- 8 -- Several thousand particles were followed for each D. Their orbital elements were defined with respect to the barycenter of the solar system. The barycentric elements are similar to the heliocentric elements for R < 5 AU, but differ for large R, where the Sun's orbital speed about the barycenter of the solar system is not negligible relative to the orbital speed of a particle. All orbits were followed from the present epoch into the future. Each particle's orbital elements were stored at 103 yr intervals. We used the output to construct a steady state distribution of OCC particles in the inner solar system. This approach differs from that of Nesvorn´y et al. (2006) and W09, who started particles at many different past epochs and used these integrations to determine the present distribution of particles. The two distributions are expected to be slightly different expressing mainly the difference between the present configuration of planets, with each planet having a specific secular phase, and the time- averaged system, where all phases are mixed. Since this difference is small, however, we can use the steady state distribution, which is easier to obtain, as a reasonable approximation. 2.3. Physical Effects Solar system micrometeoroids can be destroyed by collisions with other particles and by solar heating that can lead to sublimation and vaporisation of minerals. Here we describe how we parametrize these processes in our model. 2.3.1. Thermal Destruction Thermal alteration of grains in the interplanetary grains is a complex process. The OCC particles evolving into the inner solar system will first loose their volatile ices, which will rapidly sublimate once the grains are heated to a critical temperature. We do not model the volatile loss in detail. Instead, we crudely assume that the grains have lost ∼50% of their mass/volume when reaching R . 5 AU. We do not include the orbital effects of mass loss in orbital modeling, because it should produce only a relatively small perturbation on orbits for large particles that we consider here. The remaining grains will be primarily composed from amorphous silicates and will survive down to very small R. -- 9 -- According to Duschl et al. (1996), silicates are thermally altered at temperatures T ∼ 900-1600 K, and start to vaporise for T > 1600 K. As an example of thermal alteration, (2006, see also Capek & Borovicka 2009) studied the thermal desorption of alkali minerals and concluded that micrometeoroids should show evidence of thermal Kasuga et al. desorption of metals, Na in particular, for q < 0.1 AU. Following Moro-Mart´ın & Malhotra (2002), Kessler-Silacci et al. (2007) and others, we adopt a simple criterion for the silicate grain destruction. We will assume that they are destroyed when the grain temperature reaches T = 1500 K. The temperature of a small, fast spinning grain in interplanetary space is set by an equilibrium between the absorbed and re-radiated energy fluxes. While the absorbed flux is a simple function of the particle's size, albedo and heliocentric distance, the re-radiated flux depends on the particle's emissivity, which in turn is a function of particle's size, shape and material properties. Using the optical constants of amorphous pyroxene of approximately cosmic composition (Henning & Mutschke 1997), we find that a dark D & 100-µm grain at R has the equilibrium temperature within 10 K of a black body, T (R) ≃ 275/√R K. According to our simple destruction criterion, T (R) > 1500 K, the silicate grains should thus be removed when reaching R . 0.03 AU. On the other hand, the smallest particles considered in this work, D = 10 µm, will reach T (R) = 1500 K for R ≃ 0.05 AU. Thus, we opted for using a very simple (and conservative) criterion where particles of all sizes were destroyed, and not considered for statistics, if they ever reached R ≤ 0.05 AU. Note that, by design, this limit is the same as the one imposed by the integration timestep (Section 2.2). 2.3.2. Disruptive Collisions The collisional lifetime of meteoroids, τcoll, was taken from Grun et al. (1985; hereafter G85). It was assumed to be a function of particle mass, m, and orbital parameters, mainly a and e. We neglected the effect of orbital inclination on τcoll, because the results discussed in Steel & Elford (1986) suggest that the inclinations should affect τcoll only up to a factor of ∼2-5, which is not overly significant in the context of our work. We assumed that the mass and orbital dependencies of τcoll can be decoupled, so that τcoll (m, a, e) = Φ (m) Ψ (a, e) , (4) -- 10 -- where Φ(m) and Ψ(a, e) are discussed below. As for Φ(m), we used the G85's model based on measurements of various spacecraft and Earth-based detectors. We found that the model can be approximated by a simple empirical fit. Specifically, between 10−6.4 g and 101.2 g, we adopted the quadratic function log Φ (m) = c2 (log m)2 + c1 (log m) + c0 , (5) with (c0, c1, c2) = (4.021, 0.300, 0.083), where the values of c0, c1 and c2 were set to fit the G85's collision lifetime for circular orbits at the reference distance R0 = 1 AU. A linear relation between log Φ (m) and log m was used outside the quoted mass range to approximate the G85's model down to m = 10−8 g. Φ(m) has a minimum for m ≃ 0.01 g, corresponding to s ≃ 1 mm for ρ = 2 g cm−3 (Fig. 1). The collisional lifetime of ∼1 mm particles in the G85's model is very short, roughly 5,000 yr at 1 AU. Ψ(a, e) is assumed to drop as a power-law with R. From Eq. (18) in G85 we have Ψ =(cid:18) R R0(cid:19)α v (R) vcirc (R) , (6) where v(R) and vcirc(R) are the particle and circular speeds at R, respectively, and α ≃ 1.8. The velocity-dependent factor provides an appropriate scaling of τcoll for eccentric orbits. Averaging Eq. (6) over a Keplerian orbit with semimajor axis a and eccentricity e, we obtain where can be written as a series in e2 with good convergence. Note that J ≃ 1 for e ≃ 0, as required in Eq. (7), but can become ≫1 for very eccentric orbits. The G85's model was calibrated to match the impact fluxes of particles as measured prior to 1985. The more recent measurements indicate lower fluxes (e.g., Dikarev et al. 2005, Drolshagen et al. 2008). Also, to estimate τcoll, assumptions needed to be made in G85 about the strength of particles, and their impact speeds. As a result, τcoll proposed by G85 may have a significant uncertainty. To test different possibilities, we introduced two free J (e) , R0(cid:19)α Ψ (a, e) =(cid:18) a (1 − e cos u)1+α √1 + e cos u du 0 J (e) = 1 πZ π (7) (8) -- 11 -- parameters in our model, S1 and S2, that were used to shift the Φ(m) function in log m and log Φ, respectively (as indicated by arrows in Fig. 1). For example, the positive S2 values increase τcoll relative to the standard G85's model, as expected, for example, if particles were stronger than assumed in G85, or if the fluxes were lower. Collisional disruption of particles was taken into account during processing the output from the numerical integration described in Section 2.2. To account for the stochastic nature of breakups, we determined the break-up probability pcoll = 1 − exp(−h/τcoll), where h = 1000 yr is the output interval, and τcoll was computed individually for each particle's orbit. The code then generated a random number 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, and eliminated the particle if x < pcoll. We caution that our procedure does not take into account the small debris fragments that are generated by disruptions of larger particles. Instead, all fragments are removed from the system. This is an important approximation, whose validity needs to be tested in the future. 2.4. Model for Meteor Radar Observations We used the Opik theory ( Opik 1951) to estimate the expected terrestrial accretion rate of OCC particles in our model. Wetherill (1967), and later Greenberg (1982), improved the theory by extending it more rigorously to the case of two eccentric orbits. Here we used the Fortran program written by W. F. Bottke (see, e.g., Bottke et al. 1994), which employs the Greenberg's formalism. We modified the code to compute the radiants of the impacting bodies. The radiants were expressed in the coordinate system, where longitude l was measured from the Earth's apex in counter-clockwise direction along the Earth's orbit, and latitude b was measured relative to the Earth's orbital plane. Note that our definition of longitude is different from the one more commonly used for radar meteors, where the longitude is measured from the helion direction. The radiants were calculated before the effects of gravitational focusing were applied. The longitude and latitude values of radiants were binned into 1 deg2 area segments. For each radiant bin, the code gives information about the distribution of geocentric impact -- 12 -- speeds, vg, and heliocentric orbits prior to the impact, as defined by a, e and i. Here, vg esc)1/2, where v∞ is the relative velocity 'in infinity' and vesc is is defined as vg = (v2 the escape speed from the Earth's surface. The orbital elements, on the other hand, are the ∞ + v2 orbital elements that the particle would have in absence of the gravitational focusing by the Earth. The radiant distribution, vg, a, e and i will be compared to meteor radar observations in Section 3.3. To compare our model with observations, we need to include the meteor radar detection efficiency. This is a difficult problem because the meteor phenomenon itself and radar detec- tion of it involve complex physics. For example, the specular meteor radars (SMRs), such as the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR; Campbell-Brown 2008) and Advanced Meteor Orbit Radar (AMOR; Galligan & Baggaley 2004, 2005), detect the specular reflection of the meteor trail (the plasma formed by the meteoroid's passage). The meteoroid velocities are then derived from the detection of the Fresnel diffraction patterns of the developing trail, or are determined by measuring the time of flight between stations. The detection efficiency of a meteor should mainly be a function of the particle size and speed, but it also depends on a number of other parameters discussed, for example, in Janches et al. (2008). Following W09, we opt for a simple parametrization of radar sensitivity function, where the detection is represented by an ionization function I(m, vg) = m 10−4 g(cid:18) vg 30 km/s(cid:19)3.5 . (9) All meteors with I(m, vg) ≥ I ∗ are assumed to be detected in our model, while all meteors with I(m, vg) < I ∗ are not detected (see Fentzke et al. (2009) for a similar method applied to head echo radars). The ionization cutoff I ∗ is different for different SMRs. For example, I ∗ ∼ 1 for CMOR (Campbell-Brown 2008) and I ∗ ∼ 0.001-0.01 for AMOR (Galligan & Baggaley 2004, 2005). For reference, an OCC particle with vg = 60 km s−1 and m = 10−5 g, corresponding to s ∼ 100 µm, will have I(m, vg) ≃ 0.1, i.e., a value intermediate between the two thresholds. These meteoroids would thus be detected by AMOR, according to our definition, but not by CMOR. We will discuss these issues in more detail in Section 3.3. -- 13 -- 3. Results 3.1. Orbital Evolution of OCC Particles Wyatt & Whipple (1950) identified the following constant of motion of P-R drag C = a (1 − e2) e4/5 , (10) where a and e are the particle's semimajor axis and eccentricity (see also Breiter & Jackson 1998). This constant is independent of the particle properties such as its size. The orbit path of any particle in a and e can thus be obtained by calculating C for the initial orbit, and requiring that Eq. (10) holds at all times (Fig. 2a). For e ∼ 1, the orbit trajectories follow the lines of constant q, because C ≃ 2q for e ≃ 1. The semimajor axis of orbits shrinks till reaching a value only several times larger than q. At that point, a more familiar form of P-R drag takes place with both a and q converging to zero. The timescale of orbital evolution is as follows. For an initial orbit with a, e and q = a(1 − e), the total time of fall to the Sun is (Wyatt & Whipple 1950) τfall = 20 Myr (cid:16) s 1 cm(cid:17)(cid:18) 1 AU(cid:17)2 f (e) , ρ 2 g/cm3(cid:19)(cid:16) q Z e η3/5 dη (1 − η2)3/2 . 0 (1 + e)2 e8/5 where f (e) = 1.13 Figure 2b shows τfall for orbits relevant to OCC particles. (11) (12) Interestingly, the timescale for large a can be relatively short if q is small. For example, an OCC particle with D = 100 µm, a = 104 AU and q = 1 AU takes about 20 My to fall to the Sun. This is only about 20 orbital periods for a = 104 AU. According to Eq. (11), τfall scales linearly with particle size. Thus, a D = 10-µm particle with the same initial orbit has τfall = 2 My. One important aspect that cannot be captured by the analytical results discussed above is the effect of planetary perturbations on drifting orbits of OCC particles. To evaluate this effect, as described in Section 2.2, we numerically integrated the orbits of OCC particles as they evolve from large a and interact with the planets. -- 14 -- Figure 3 shows the orbital history of a particle, whose orbit evolved all the way down into the inner solar system. Initially, the particle's semimajor axis underwent a random walk caused by indirect planetary perturbations, mainly from Jupiter, during each perihelion passage (Wiegert & Tremaine 1999). Then, at time t ≃ 5×105 yr, a single perihelion passage produced a significant drop of a from 150 to 40 AU, where the particle started to interact with the exterior mean motion resonances with Neptune. The following evolution was mainly controlled by P-R drag. Eventually, the orbit decoupled from Jupiter, reached a ∼ 1 AU, and kept shrinking further toward the Sun, where the particle was thermally destroyed. The large oscillations of q for 0.9 < t < 1.7 Myr, correlated with those in i, were produced by Kozai dynamics (e.g., Kozai 1962). The orbit history shown in Fig. 3 is typical for an OCC particle that is able to make it into the inner solar system. These particles, however, represent a relatively small fraction of the initial population, with most particles being ejected from the solar system by planetary perturbations. Using dN(q) with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1 (Section 2.1), a ∼ 103 AU and isotropic distribution of inclination vectors, roughly 0.8-1.5 % of particles with D = 100 µm evolve down into the inner solar system and decouple from Jupiter (as defined by the aphelion distance Q = a(1 + e) < 4 AU), without being disrupted by an impact (with standard S1 = S2 = 0; Section 2.3) or ever having q < 0.05 AU (to avoid sublimation). These particles can potentially be important for the terrestrial impact record and interpretation of the meteor radar data. The bulk of OCC particles that do not reach a ∼ 1 AU, do not significantly contribute to the Earth's accretion, because these particles spend most of their lifetimes at R ≫ 1 AU. The fraction of OCC particles reaching a ∼ 1 AU, f1, normalized to the number of particles whose orbits were initially bound (see Section 2.1), is sensitive to particle size. For D = 10 µm, dN(q) described in Section 2.1, and initial a ∼ 103 AU, f1 ≃ 0.15 − 0.2. For D = 300 µm, on the other hand, f1 ≃ 2 × 10−3. Moreover, for D = 1 mm, only one particle out of the total of 5000 reached a ∼ 1 AU. This trend, with the larger particles having progressively smaller f1 values, has interesting implications for the observations of sporadic meteors (Section 4). The above estimates used τcoll as described in Section 2.3.2. Collisional disruption, however, turned out to have only a modest effect for the standard G85's τcoll (S1 = S2 = 0) -- 15 -- and the particle sizes considered here. For example, only ∼2% of particles with D = 100 µm that reached a ∼ 1 AU in our numerical integration have disrupted prior to decoupling from Jupiter, as detected in post-processing of the integration output, with the standard G85's τcoll. A great majority of particles with D = 300 µm also survived. The effect of disruptive collisions becomes more significant for D ∼ 1 mm, for which τcoll is significantly shorter (Section 2.3.2) and P-R drag is weaker. The thermal effects discussed in Section 2.3.1 turned out to be very important for all particle sizes considered here. For example, 75 out of 122 particles (i.e., over 60 %) with D = 100 µm that ever reached Q < 4 AU, previously had q < 0.05 AU, which is our crude threshold for the thermal destruction of particles. Also, 68 out of 74 D = 300 µm particles (over 90 %) reaching Q < 4 AU previously had q < 0.05 AU. The thermally destroyed particles are removed and the orbital histories after their disruption are not used for our analysis. These fractions are a direct consequence of the relative importance of planetary pertur- bations and P-R drag on particles with different D and q. The orbital evolution of a large particle on the OCC-like orbit is primarily controlled by planetary perturbations. Sooner or later, the planets will eject the particle from the solar system, unless the orbit shrinks and decouples from Jupiter. To achieve this, q of the particle's orbit must be very low, so that the P-R drag timescale is short (see Fig. 2b). But if q is low, it may easily drop below q < 0.05 AU, where the particle is removed, thus explaining why most large particles reaching Q < 4 AU previously have q < 0.05 AU. Interestingly, the fraction of particles with D ≃ 100-300 µm reaching a ∼ 1 AU is not overly sensitive to the initial perihelion distance, as far as q . 5 AU. This is because it is more likely to decouple if q is low, because P-R drag is stronger, but this trend is nearly canceled, because particles with very low q tend to drop below q = 0.05 AU and sublimate before they can decouple. Particles with D ≃ 100-300 µm and q > 5 AU, on the other hand, tend to have very long P-R drag timescales (e.g., τfall > 50 Myr for initial a = 103 AU; Fig. 2b), and are scattered by planets from the solar system. -- 16 -- 3.2. Orbital and Spatial Distributions Here we discuss the expected distribution of OCC particles in the inner solar system. Figure 4 shows the number density of OCC particles as a function of R. As expected, the particle density increases toward the Sun. The radial distribution of D = 100 µm particles can be approximated by a power law, dN(R) ∝ R−αdR, where α ≃ 1.5 for R < 5 AU, and α ≃ 2.0 for R > 10 AU. Both these radial dependencies are significantly steeper than dN(R) ∝ R−1dR, expected for distribution of particles on nearly-circular orbits (see, e.g., Dermott et al. 2001). The relatively steep radial distribution is a consequence of Keplerian motion of particles with e ∼ 1. For R < a, the time spent by a particle on the Keplerian orbit between R and R + dR is dt ∝ R0.5dR. This leads to dN(R) ∝ R−1.5dR, if the expected number of particles, which is proportional to dt, is divided by volume 4πR2dR. For R > a, on the other hand, appropriate for large radial distances, dt ∼ const. and dN(R) ∝ R−2dR. Thus, α ≃ 1.5-2 is expected for e ∼ 1 (see also Liou et al. 1999). We find that the number density of OCC particles at R ∼ 1 AU is mainly contributed by the particles that orbitally decoupled from Jupiter. This shows the importance of orbital decoupling for the distribution of OCC particles in the inner solar system, and their accretion by the Earth. Specifically, most OCC particles accreted by the Earth are expected to have a(1 + e) < 4 AU despite the fact that their orbits started with a & 103 AU. Figure 5 shows the distributions of orbital elements for OCC particles with D = 100 µm and R < 5 AU. The semimajor axis distribution, dN(a), has a broad maximum centered at 0.5-2 AU with a ∼ 2 AU being the most common. dN(a) decreases toward larger a, because particles with a > 3 AU are coupled to Jupiter, have short dynamical lifetimes, and do not spend much time at R < 5 AU. The peak of dN(a) at a = 6-7 AU is produced by orbits in the exterior mean motion resonances with Jupiter, which prolong the dynamical lifetime of particles by phase protecting them against encounters with Jupiter (Liou et al. 1999). The eccentricity distribution dN(e) increases toward e ∼ 1, which is expected because all orbits started with e > 0.995. The tail extending to the moderate and low eccentricity values is due to the dynamically long-lived particles, whose orbits decouple from Jupiter and become circularized by P-R drag. -- 17 -- The inclination distribution is also interesting as it significantly deviates from the initial distribution with dN(i) ∝ sin(i)di (Fig. 5c). The retrograde orbits are more common than the prograde ones. The preference for retrograde orbits is probably caused by gravitational perturbations from Jupiter that are more effective on prograde orbits, because the encounter speeds are lower, and thus ∆V 's are larger. The prograde particles should therefore have shorter dynamical lifetimes than the retrograde particles, which would explain their relative paucity in a steady state dN(i) for R < 5 AU. Interestingly, however, the particles that decouple from Jupiter and reach a ∼ 1 AU by P-R drag do not show a strong preference for retrograde orbits. In addition, the steady state dN(i) lacks orbits with i ∼ 90◦. We believe that this is a consequence of Kozai dynamics (e.g., Kozai 1962). It is well known that the initially near-polar orbits will suffer large oscillations of q driven by variations of the orbital angular momentum vector. Most of these orbits can therefore reach very low q values, where the particles will be destroyed by thermal effects. Indeed, by studying the orbital histories of particles that started with i ∼ 90◦, we found that most of these orbits had q < 0.05 AU prior to reaching Q < 4 AU. The steady state distribution of orbital elements of D = 300-µm particles is similar to the one discussed above. Instead of having a single peak at a = 6-7 AU, however, dN(a) for a > 5 AU is more irregular showing many peaks and dips. Apparently, since the larger D = 300-µm particles drift more slowly by P-R drag, they are more susceptible to capture in a large number of resonances (Liou et al. 1999). The second difference concerns dN(e), which is slightly more clumped toward e ∼ 1 for D = 300 µm than for D = 100 µm. 3.3. Radiants and Orbits of Particles Accreted by the Earth The radiants of OCC particles are located near the Earth's apex (Fig. 6). This is logical because the retrograde OCC particles, which come from the apex direction, have much higher velocity relative to the Earth (∼60 km s−1) than particles on prograde orbits. The retrograde particles therefore also have, according to the usual nσv rule, rather large impact probabilities with the Earth. In addition, the ionization cutoff used here (Eq. 9) poses a rather strict limit on the mass of meteoroids that can be detected by SMRs at low -- 18 -- speeds. For example, a D = 100-µm particle with m = 10−6 g and vg = 30 km s−1 has I = 0.01, which is near or slightly above the detection limit of AMOR, and way below the detection limit of CMOR. The model radiants form the south and north apex concentrations, just as observed (e.g., Jones & Brown 1993, Galligan & Baggaley 2005, Campbell-Brown 2008). The lack of radiants within ∼10◦ about the ecliptic is due to near absence of OCC meteoroids with i ≃ 180◦ (see Fig. 5c). The lack of radiants with b > 50◦ (or b < −50◦) is the consequence of the inclination distribution shown in Fig. 5c that is depleted in orbits with i ∼ 90◦. Most north (south) radiants fall into an area on the north (south) hemisphere that has the characteristic triangular or half-disk shape. For D = 100 µm, the centers of radiant concentrations are at b ≃ ±20◦. For D = 300 µm, the centers are at b ≃ ±25◦. This reflects the differences in dN(i) between the populations of particles with D = 100 µm and D = 300 µm that we obtained in the model. For comparison, observations indicate that b ≃ ±15◦ (e.g., Galligan & Baggaley 2005, Chau et al. 2007, Campbell-Brown 2008). In addition, the apex sources that we obtained in our model tend to be more stretched in both l and b than the observed ones. While more modeling work will be needed to test things with a better statistic, the issues discussed above may indicate that a better fit to observations could be obtained if the retrograde source had inclinations closer to 180◦ than the bulk of OCC particles with 100◦ < i < 160◦. It is not clear how this could be achieved by tweaking the parameters of our model. Instead, clues such as these seem to highlight the importance of known HTCs. Indeed, the two prominent active HTCs, 1P/Halley and 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, both have i ≃ 162◦. They would therefore be expected to produce apex sources closer to the ecliptic than the bulk of retrograde OCC particles (Fig. 7). An interesting feature in Fig. 6b is the presence of a ring that stretches to ±60◦ in longitude and latitude. A similar ring has been noted in Campbell-Brown (2008), who suggested that the region inside the ring can be depleted in meteor radiants, except for apex sources, because the retrograde meteoroids with radiants inside the ring would have shorter collisional lifetimes. Our simple collisional model cannot reproduce this effect, because τcoll is independent of i (see Section 2.3.2). In addition, W09 suggested that the origin of the -- 19 -- ring can be traced back to Kozai dynamics, which confines the allowed radiants of particles on high-inclination orbits. Here we confirm the W09's result by isolating particles that contribute to the ring, and checking on their orbital behavior. The impact speed of OCC particles peaks at vg ≃ 60 km s−1 (Fig. 8 for D = 100 µm and Fig. 9 for D = 300 µm), which is a nice match to observations of apex meteors (Galligan & Baggaley 2005, Campbell-Brown 2008).4 The width of the peak also looks good (cf. Fig. 13 in Campbell-Brown 2008). In comparison, using a population of meteoroids from 1P/Halley and 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, W09 obtained a peak at vg ≃ 70 km s−1, which is expected for large particles that have not evolved far from their parent comet orbit. Figures 8 and 9 also show the model distributions of orbital elements of OCC meteoroids. Distributions dN(a), now heavily weighted by the collision probability (cf. Fig. 5), peak at a ≃ 1 AU and show a tail extending to a > 2 AU. The meteoroids in the peak have orbits that have strongly evolved by P-R drag. The model distributions for D = 100 µm and D = 300 µm are similar, except for a few wiggles produced by statistical fluctuations. Both provide a good match to the observed semimajor axis distribution of apex meteors (cf. Fig. 11 in Galligan & Baggaley 2005). According to our model, most apex meteors should have inclinations between i ∼ 100◦ and 180◦ (Figs. 8c and 9c), which is also the range indicated by observations. Unlike dN(i) measured by radars, which shows a broad peak centered at i ∼ 150-160◦, our model dN(i) is more spread and noisy. While part of this discrepancy could be blamed on insufficient statistics in our model, it may also point to a more fundamental problem. The eccentricity distribution is puzzling. For both D = 100 µm and D = 300 µm, we obtained dN(e) that raises toward e ∼ 1. This trend is slightly more pronounced for D = 300 µm (Fig. 9d) than for D = 100 µm (Fig. 8d). W09, using selected HTCs for parent bodies of apex meteors, obtained dN(e) that also peaked toward e ∼ 1. In contrast, the observed apex meteors have nearly flat dN(e) at 0.2 < e < 1, and show a slight depletion for e < 0.1 (Fig. 13 in Campbell-Brown 2008). 4Note that observations by High Power and Large Aperture (HPLA) radars such as AO or ALTAIR measure the apex peak speed at ≃ 55 km s−1. -- 20 -- The cause of these differences is unclear. To obtain lower values of e in our model, the orbits would need to become more circularized by P-R drag before arriving to a ∼ 1 AU. This could be achieved, for example, if more weight is given to particles starting with q > 1 AU. We confirm this by using γ > 1, but a detailed match to the observed eccentricity distribution remains elusive. A detailed analysis of this problem is left for future studies. 4. Relative Importance of Helion/Antihelion and Apex Sources The observations of sporadic meteors show that the relative importance of helion/anti- helion and apex sources depends on the sensitivity of the radar that is used to carry out such observations. The less sensitive SMRs with I ∗ ∼ 1, such as the Harvard Radar Meteor Project (HRMP; Jones & Brown 1993, Taylor & Elford 1998) or CMOR, detect ∼3-10 times more helion/antihelion meteors then apex meteors (see, e.g., Campbell-Brown (2009) for comparison of different radars). The more sensitive radars, such as AMOR with I ∗ ∼ 0.001- 0.01, on the other hand, detect a relatively larger number of apex meteors. Finally, the apex meteors are predominant in observations by the highly-sensitive AO radar (e.g., Janches et al. 2003), because of their ability to detect small particles (Fentzke & Janches 2008, Fentzke et al. 2008). This trend can be explained if the size frequency distribution (SFD) of apex meteoroids is steeper (i.e., if the number of meteoroids more sharply increases with decreasing size) than that of the helion/antihelion meteoroids, because radars that are capable of detecting smaller meteoroids would then be expected to see many more apex meteors (Fentzke & Janches 2008). For example, the initial SFD of particles produced by disrupted OCCs (or HTCs) could be steeper than the one produced by the sources of the helion/antihelion meteoroids (presumably active and disrupted JFCs; W09, Nesvorn´y et al. 2010). While this is a possibility that cannot be ruled out by the existing data, there are also no indications that this might be true (McDonnell et al. 1987, Grun et al. 2001, Green et al. 2004, Reach et al. 2007). We propose that the predominance of apex meteors in AO observations is caused by orbital dynamics of particles released from OCCs (or HTCs). Let us assume that the initial SFD of particles released from OCCs (or HTCs) is dN0(D) = N0D−ζdD. The SFD of -- 21 -- meteoroids accreted by the Earth will then be dN(D) = f0PiN0D−ζdD , (13) where f0 is the fraction of particles that remain on bound orbits (see Section 2.1), and Pi is the impact probability of these particles on the Earth. Factor f0 expresses the removal of small particles by radiation pressure (see Section 2.1). Thus, the size dependence of f0 is such that it cannot increase the number of small particles relative to the large ones.5 Table 1 lists Pi and v∞ for various sources. For example, the OCC particles with D = 30 µm and D = 300 µm have Pi = 2 × 10−6 and Pi = 5 × 10−7, respectively. This indicates that dN(D) should have a steeper slope than dN0(D). Specifically, if dN0(D) can be approximated by D−ζdD for D ∼ 30-300 µm, where ζ is a constant, we find that dN(D) ∝ D−(ζ+δ)dD, where δ ∼ 0.6 for OCCs. This estimate was obtained with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1, S1 ∼ S2 ∼ 0, q∗ = 0.05 AU and initial a ∼ 103 AU. The results for S2 = 1, applicable if τcoll were ∼10 times longer than in G85, and for HTCs are similar. For comparison, W09 suggested that comet 2P/Encke (or an orbitally similar lost comet) is the main source of helion/antihelion meteors. We find that particles released from comet 2P/Encke have Pi = 6× 10−5 for D = 30 µm and Pi = 2.3× 10−4 for D = 300 µm (Table 1). If these estimates are representative for the sources of the helion/antihelion meteors, they suggest that the slope of dN(D) should be shallower than that of dN0(D) (δ ∼ −0.6). We therefore find that dN(D) of apex meteoroids is expected to be steeper than that of helion/antihelion meteoroids, even if the initial SFD of particles released from the respective sources -- JFCs and OCCs/HTCs -- were similar. This effect is produced by orbital dynamics of particles starting on different initial orbits. As we discussed in Section 3.1, the Earth impact record of OCC particles is mainly contributed by those particle that decouple from Jupiter. Since the decoupling efficiency, described by factor f1 in Section 3.1, ramps up toward smaller D, the population of small OCC (or HTC) particles is enhanced, relative to large ones. This effect is weaker for JFC meteoroids, for which the correlation between f1 and Pi is not as extreme. In the JFC case, the population of small particles accreted by the 5Factor f0(D) could presumably be approximated by a step function with f0(D) = 0 for D < D∗ and f0(D) = 1 for D > D∗, where D∗ is the critical diameter implied by Eq. (2). -- 22 -- Earth is suppressed by their short P-R drag timescale, and consequently, lower Pi. The magnitude of the SFD effects discussed above is just right to explain observations. If the ionization threshold I ∗ of AMOR is ∼100 times lower than that of CMOR/HRMP, these more sensitive instruments are expected to detect meteoroids that are ∼5 times smaller in size. If they detect 3-10 times more apex meteors than the helion/antihelion meteors (e.g., Campbell-Brown 2008), this would suggest that the SFD slope index difference between apex and helion/antihelion meteors is δ ∼ 0.7-1.4. We found δ ∼ 1.2 above, in a good agreement with observations. Figure 10 illustrates the relative strength of sporadic meteor sources expected from our model. 5. Conclusions We found that only a very small fraction, f1 . 10−4, of D & 1-mm OCC particles can ever make it into the inner solar system. The relevance of these very large OCC particles to observations of sporadic meteors is therefore not obvious. The situation looks more favorable for OCC particles with D ≃ 100-300 µm. These particles should survive the effects of radiation pressure, if released from returning OCCs at R & 4-12 AU. Moreover, about 0.2-1.5% avoid being collisionally disrupted or thermally destroyed, decouple from Jupiter, and finally spiral down to a ∼ 1 AU, where their Earth-impact probability is increased by orders of magnitude. We estimated that the overall probability of Earth impact per one particle released on bound orbit from the returning OCC is Pi ∼ 0.5-1 × 10−6 for D ≃ 100-300 µm. This is 50-80 times lower than Pi expected for particles released from HTCs such as 1P/Halley and 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, and 200-400 times lower than Pi expected for JFCs such as 1P/Encke. The OCC particles will therefore significantly contribute to the sporadic meteor complex only if the mass of material produced by disrupting OCCs is large enough to compensate for these factors. From L02, we can roughly estimate that ∼5 returning OCCs disrupt per year producing the mass input of perhaps as much as ∼ 1018 g yr−1, or 3 × 108 kg s−1. Only a small fraction of this mass will end in bound particles with D ≃ 100-300 µm. For comparison, the active JFCs produce ∼300 kg s−1 (Reach et al. 2007). -- 23 -- We found that the SFD of apex meteoroids, presumably starting on highly-eccentric orbits, is expected to be steeper than those of helion/antihelion meteoroids, even if their initial SFDs were similar. The steepening of the SFD slope of apex meteoroids results from the efficiency with which OCC/HTC meteoroids of different sizes decouple from Jupiter. This result has interesting implications for observations of sporadic meteors, because it can explain why the north/south apex sources are more represented in observations of highly sensitive radars that are capable of detecting smaller meteoroids. This article is based on work supported by the NASA's PG&G program. The work of DV was partially supported by the Czech Grant Agency (grant 205/08/0064) and the Research Program MSM0021620860 of the Czech Ministry of Education. The work of DJ was partially supported by NSF Award AST 0908118. We thank W. F. Bottke for sharing with us his Opik code, M. Campbell-Brown for useful discussions, and Tadeusz Jopek for a very helpful review of this article. Bottke, W. F., Nolan, M. C., Greenberg, R., & Kolvoord, R. A. 1994, Icarus, 107, 255 REFERENCES Burns, J. A., Lamy, P. L., & Soter, S. 1979, Icarus, 40, 1 Breiter, S., & Jackson, A. A. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 237 Campbell-Brown, M. D. 2008, Icarus, 196, 144 Capek, D., & Borovicka, J. 2009, Icarus, 202, 361 Chau, J. L., Woodman, R. F., & Galindo, F. 2007, Icarus, 188, 162 Choi, Y.-J., Weissman, P., Chesley, S., Bauer, J., Stansberry, J., Tegler, S., Romanishin, W., & Consolmagno, G. 2006, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 563, 1 Dermott, S. F., Grogan, K., Durda, D. D., Jayaraman, S., Kehoe, T. J. J., Kortenkamp, S. J., Wyatt, M. C., 2001, In Interplanetary Dust (Grun, E., Gustafson, B. S., Dermott, S., Fechtig, H., Eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 569 -- 24 -- Dikarev, V., Grun, E., Baggaley, J., Galligan, D., Landgraf, M., & Jehn, R. 2005, Advances in Space Research, 35, 1282 Drolshagen, G., Dikarev, V., Landgraf, M., Krag, H., & Kuiper, W. 2008, Earth Moon and Planets, 102, 191 Duschl, W. J., Gail, H.-P., & Tscharnuter, W. M. 1996, A&A, 312, 624 Dybczy´nski, P. A. 2001, A&A, 375, 643 Fentzke, J. T., & Janches, D. 2008, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 113, 3304 Fentzke, J. T., Janches, D., & Sparks, J. J. 2009, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar- Terrestrial Physics, 71, 653 Francis, P. J. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1348 Galligan, D. P., & Baggaley, W. J. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 422 Galligan, D. P., & Baggaley, W. J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 551 Green, S. F., et al. 2004, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 109, 12 Greenberg, R. 1982, AJ, 87, 184 Grun, E., Zook, H. A., Fechtig, H., & Giese, R. H. 1985, Icarus, 62, 244 Grun, E., et al. 2001, A&A, 377, 1098 Henning, T., & Mutschke, H. 1997, A&A, 327, 743 Janches, D., & Chau, J. L. 2005, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 67, 1196 Janches, D., Nolan, M. C., Meisel, D. D., Mathews, J. D., Zhou, Q. H., & Moser, D. E. 2003, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108, 1222 Janches, D., Heinselman, C. J., Chau, J. L., Chandran, A., & Woodman, R. 2006, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 111, 7317 -- 25 -- Janches, D., Close, S., & Fentzke, J. T. 2008, Icarus, 193, 105 Jenniskens, P. 2008, Earth Moon and Planets, 102, 505 Jones, J., & Brown, P. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 524 Jones, J., Campbell, M., & Nikolova, S. 2001, Meteoroids 2001 Conference, 495, 575 Kasuga, T., Yamamoto, T., Kimura, H., & Watanabe, J. 2006, A&A, 453, L17 Kessler-Silacci, J. E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 680 Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591 Kresak, L. 1976, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 27, 35 Levison, H. F., & Duncan, M. J. 1994, Icarus, 108, 18 Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Dones, L., Jedicke, R., Wiegert, P. A., & Bottke, W. F. 2002, Science, 296, 2212 Liou, J.-C., Zook, H. A., & Jackson, A. A. 1999, Icarus, 141, 13 McDonnell, J. A. M., et al. 1987, A&A, 187, 719 Moro-Mart´ın, A., & Malhotra, R. 2002, AJ, 124, 2305 Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Bottke, W. F., & Sykes, M. 2006, Icarus, 181, 107 Nesvorn´y, D., Jenniskens, P., Levison, H. F., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlick´y, D., & Gounelle, M. 2010, ApJ, 713, 816 Oort, J. H. 1950, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 11, 91 Opik, E. J. 1951, Proc. R. Irish Acad. Sect. A, vol. 54, p. 165-199 (1951)., 54, 165 Reach, W. T., Kelley, M. S., & Sykes, M. V. 2007, Icarus, 191, 298 Robertson, H. P. 1937, MNRAS, 97, 423 Steel, D. 1996, Space Sci. Rev., 78, 507 -- 26 -- Steel, D. I., & Elford, W. G. 1986, MNRAS, 218, 185 Taylor, A. D., & Elford, W. G. 1998, Earth, Planets, and Space, 50, 569 Wetherill, G. W. 1967, J. Geophys. Res., 72, 2429 Whipple, F. L., & Gossner, J. L. 1949, ApJ, 109, 380 Whipple, F. L. 1951, ApJ, 113, 464 Wiegert, P., & Tremaine, S. 1999, Icarus, 137, 84 Wiegert, P., Vaubaillon, J., & Campbell-Brown, M. 2009, Icarus, 201, 295 Wisdom, J., & Holman, M. 1991, AJ, 102, 1528 Wyatt, S. P., & Whipple, F. L. 1950, ApJ, 111, 134 Younger, J. P., Reid, I. M., Vincent, R. A., Holdsworth, D. A., & Murphy, D. J. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 350 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.0. -- 27 -- D µm 10 30 100 300 1000 10 30 100 300 1000 Pi 10−6 OCCs 4.6 (4.6) 1.9 (1.9) 1.0 (1.4) 0.5 (0.6) 0.2 (0.3) hv∞i km s−1 52 (52) 47 (47) 46 (46) 55 (54) 58 (58) 1P/Halley (HTC) 57 (57) 100 (110) 80 (110) 24 (46) 17 (22) 60 (60) 59 (59) 59 (59) 65 (61) 67 (67) 55P/Tempel-Tuttle (HTC) 10 30 100 300 1000 53 (53) 120 (120) 80 (120) 27 (51) 16 (23) 60 (60) 59 (59) 60 (59) 66 (61) 68 (66) 2P/Encke (JFC) 10 30 100 300 1000 17 (17) 60 (60) 210 (220) 230 (340) 120 (300) 18.0 (18.0) 18.5 (18.5) 18.7 (18.4) 23.6 (22.0) 30.5 (27.0) Table 1: The Earth impact probability, Pi, and mean impact speed, hv∞i, of particles released on different orbits. For each particle's diameter, D, we give our best estimate values for the standard G85's τcoll (S1 = S2 = 0), and for S1 = 0 and S2 = 1 (values in parenthesis). The longer collisional lifetime in the later case leads to the larger Pi values. The effect of disruptive collisions is significant for D & 300 µm. -- 28 -- Fig. 1. -- The mass dependence, Φ(m), of the adopted model for the collisional lifetime of particles. The plot shows Φ(m) for a particle on the circular orbit at the reference heliocentric distance R0 = 1 AU. Two parameters of the collisional model, S1 and S2, were used to test the sensitivity of our results to modifications of Φ(m). -- 29 -- Fig. 2. -- Effects of P-R drag on the highly-eccentric orbits of OCC particles. (a) Evolution tracks of particles evolving by P-R drag in semimajor axis and perihelion distance. Particles with e ≃ 1 evolve from right to left along the lines of constant perihelion distance. The shaded area is inaccessible to orbits. (b) Evolution timescale for particles with D = 100 µm and ρ = 2 g cm−3. Contours show the time of fall, τfall, from the initial orbit with a and q to the Sun. According to Eq. (11), τfall scales linearly with D (and ρ), so that, for example, the 1 My contour for D = 100 µm is the 10 My contour for D = 1 mm. -- 30 -- Fig. 3. -- The orbit history of a particle with D = 100 µm, initial a = 103 AU and q = 1.53 AU. After 1.7 Myr, the orbit decouples from Jupiter and moves to a ∼ 1 AU. The particle ends up having a < 0.1 AU, and sublimates upon reaching R < 0.05 AU. -- 31 -- Fig. 4. -- The radial distribution of OCC particles that we obtained in our model. The number density was normalized to the input flux of one particle released on bound orbit per year. We used D = 100 µm here. The distribution with D = 300 µm looks similar for R > 5 AU, but is depleted below 5 AU, relative to the one shown here, because fewer particles with D = 300 µm are able to decouple from Jupiter. Particles were released on orbits with a ∼ 103 AU and uniformly random sin i. The initial distribution dN(q) was set as described in Section 2.1 with γ = 0.5 (the results are not sensitive to γ). -- 32 -- Fig. 5. -- The steady state distribution of orbital elements of particles with D = 100 µm: (a) dN(a), (b) dN(e), and (c) dN(i). The distributions shown here ignore particles with R > 5 AU. They therefore represent the steady state distribution of orbits in the inner solar system, which is relevant for observations of the inner zodiacal cloud and sporadic meteors. -- 33 -- Fig. 6. -- The radiants of OCC meteoroids determined in our model with I ∗ = 0.01: (a) D = 100 µm, and (b) D = 300 µm. The north and south apex sources are clearly visible. In addition, the radiant distribution in panel (b) shows a ring structure centered at (l, b) = (0, 0) and extending to ≃60◦ in l and b. The high-frequency fluctuation of radiant density between neighbor bins is due to insufficient statistics and should be disregarded. The units of the side bar are arbitrary. -- 34 -- Fig. 7. -- The same as Fig. 6 but for D = 100-µm particles released from 1P/Halley. The results for 55P/Tempel-Tuttle are similar. -- 35 -- Fig. 8. -- The orbital element distribution of model apex meteoroids: (a) vg, (b) a, (c) i, and (d) e. Here we used OCC particles with D = 100 µm and I ∗ = 0.01. The apex meteoroids were selected by using the following radiant cutoffs: −40◦ < l < 40◦ and −40◦ < b < 40◦. -- 36 -- Fig. 9. -- The same as Fig. 8 but for D = 300-µm OCC particles. -- 37 -- Fig. 10. -- The expected relative strength of the apex and helion/antihelion sources as a function of particle size. The triangles (diamonds) show the result for OCC (1P/Halley) particles. We calculated the relative strength by dividing Pi(D) listed in Table 1 for OCC (1P/Halley) particles (assumed here to represent the apex source) by Pi(D) of 2P/Encke particles (assumed to represent the helion/antihelion source; W09). The Pi(D) ratio is a proxy for the relative strength of meteor sources if dN0(D) of different initial populations had roughly the same shape. We arbitrarily normalized the ratio to 1 for particles with D = 100 µm. As more sensitive radars detect smaller particles, they are expected see more apex meteors, because Pi(D) of OCC (1P/Halley) particles increases while that of JFC particles drops.
1511.05973	1	1511	2015-11-18T21:00:43	Evidence for Gas from a Disintegrating Extrasolar Asteroid	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We report high-resolution spectroscopic observations of WD 1145+017 -- a white dwarf that recently has been found to be transitted by multiple asteroid-sized objects within its tidal radius. We have discovered numerous circumstellar absorption lines with linewidths of $\sim$ 300 km s$^{-1}$ from Mg, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe and Ni, possibly from several gas streams produced by collisions among the actively disintegrating objects. The atmosphere of WD 1145+017 is polluted with 11 heavy elements, including O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, V:, Cr, Mn, Fe and Ni. Evidently, we are witnessing the active disintegration and subsequent accretion of an extrasolar asteroid.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Evidence for Gas from a Disintegrating Extrasolar Asteroid1 S. Xu(Ꮠ)a, M. Jurab, P. Dufourc, B. Zuckermanb ABSTRACT We report high-resolution spectroscopic observations of WD 1145+017 -- a white dwarf that recently has been found to be transitted by multiple asteroid- sized objects within its tidal radius. We have discovered numerous circumstellar absorption lines with linewidths of ∼ 300 km s−1 from Mg, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe and Ni, possibly from several gas streams produced by collisions among the actively disintegrating objects. The atmosphere of WD 1145+017 is polluted with 11 heavy elements, including O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, V:, Cr, Mn, Fe and Ni. Evidently, we are witnessing the active disintegration and subsequent accretion of an extrasolar asteroid. Subject headings: white dwarfs, circumstellar matter, minor planets 1. Introduction Recent studies show that planetary systems are widespread around white dwarfs. About 25-50% of white dwarfs show "pollution" in their atmospheres, likely from accretion of plan- etesimals that were perturbed by planet(s) into the white dwarf's tidal radius (Zuckerman et al. 2003, 2010; Koester et al. 2014). High-resolution spectroscopic observations of these polluted white dwarfs typically reveal abundances similar to the observed compositions of solar system objects (Jura & Young 2014). The most heavily polluted white dwarfs often aEuropean Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748 Garching, Germany, [email protected] bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles CA 90095-1562; [email protected], [email protected] cInstitut de Recherche sur les Exoplan`etes (iREx), Universit´e de Montr´eal, Montr´eal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada; [email protected] 1The data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among Caltech, the University of California and NASA. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. -- 2 -- have an infrared excess from an orbiting dust disk (Kilic et al. 2006). Occasionally, cir- cumstellar gaseous material is also detected, mostly via calcium infrared triplet emission (Gansicke et al. 2006; Melis et al. 2012; Debes et al. 2012). These systems can be dynamically active. The infrared flux of the dust disk around WD J0959-0200 dropped ∼ 30% within one year (Xu & Jura 2014). The gas disk around WD J1617+1620 was dissipated within a few years (Wilson et al. 2014). One model to explain these changes is the impact of an extrasolar asteroid onto a pre-existing dust disk (Jura 2008). However, the parent body has ever been detected. In this letter, we report Keck spectroscopic observations of a helium-dominated white dwarf WD 1145+017. This star was first discovered in the Hamburg/ESO survey (Friedrich et al. 2000). It caught our attention due to the strong infrared excess when comparing SDSS, UKIDSS and WISE photometry. After performing the Keck observations, we subsequently learned that this star happened to be located in a K2 field, and it was observed to be transitted by multiple objects with periods between 4.5 and 5.0 hr (Vanderburg et al. 2015; Croll et al. 2015). The system is rapidly evolving and the transit data are interpreted as cometary-like outflows from fragments of a larger parent body. Here, we provide additional evidence in support of this model. 2. Observations and Data Reduction 2.1. HIRES WD 1145+017 was observed with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES) (Vogt et al. 1994) on the Keck I telescope on 2015 April 11 (UT). The blue collimator was chosen with the C5 deck, which has a slit width of 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)148 and a resolution of ∼ 40,000. Three consecutive 2400 s exposures of WD 1145+017 were taken. The flux standard Feige 34 was observed with the same setup. Data reduction was performed by using both MAKEE and IRAF following Klein et al. (2010); Xu et al. (2014). We used the spectrum of Feige 34 to calibrate the target spectrum and reconstruct the profiles of broad helium lines. The three separate spectra were combined with equal weights to produce the final spectrum, which has a wavelength coverage from 3110 A to 5950 A. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) per pixel is typically over 25. We identified ∼ 200 photospheric absorption lines from 15 different ions. About one third of these lines also show broad (∼ 300 km s−1) circumstellar absorption features, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. All circumstellar lines arise from energy levels within 4.2 eV of the ground state (see Table 2) . -- 3 -- 2.2. ESI On 2015 April 25 (UT), we observed WD 1145+017 with the ESI (Echellette Spectro- graph and Imager) (Sheinis et al. 2002) on the Keck II telescope. The narrowest possible slit width of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)3 was chosen, corresponding to a resolution of ∼ 13,700. WD 1145+017 was observed with two consecutive 1180 s exposures. Data reduction was performed using the MAKEE package. Each echelle order was continuum normalized in IRAF with a low-order polynomial. The ESI spectrum has a continuous coverage from 3900 A to 10100 A with a S/N per pixel over 35. Some lines were only detected in the ESI data due to its coverage in the longer wavelength. Unfortunately, about two thirds of the photospheric lines lie short- ward of 3900 A, which is not accessible with ESI. For the spectral region that overlaps with HIRES data (3900 - 5950 A), the agreement is quite good, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. 3. Discussion 3.1. Photospheric Abundances We adopted an effective temperature of 15,900 K and surface gravity of 8.0 for WD 1145+017 (Vanderburg et al. 2015). However, the surface gravity is highly uncertain because it cannot be derived unambiguously from spectroscopic fitting for helium white dwarfs below ∼ 16,500 K (Voss et al. 2007). To determine the abundances of heavy elements, we followed procedures outlined in Dufour et al. (2012) and fitted a spectral region of 10-15 A at a time. HIRES data were used primarily for the analysis due to its higher spectral resolution. The final abundances and the photospheric lines are shown in Table 1. Oxygen only has lines in the lower resolution ESI data. The best fit model requires an oxygen abundance log n(O)/n(He) of -3.7 and -4.5 for the O I 7775 A triplet and O I 8446 A, respectively. The discrepancy cannot be due to contaminations from circumstellar absorption because the oxygen lines all arise from energy levels ∼ 9 eV above the ground state. A higher weight is given to O I 8446 A because the O I triplet is not resolved, as shown in Fig 1. The total mass of heavy elements currently in the outer convection zone of WD 1145+017 is 6.6 × 1023 g, about 70% the mass of Ceres. The planetesimal was dominated by four elements, O, Fe, Mg and Si, similar to rocky objects in the solar system and extrasolar -- 4 -- asteroids accreted onto other polluted white dwarfs, as shown in Fig 3 (e.g. Klein et al. 2010; Dufour et al. 2012; Jura & Young 2014). The mass fraction of oxygen is ∼ 60%, which is among the most oxygen-rich extrasolar planetesimals ever detected. However, due to the large error associated with the oxygen abundance, the oxygen abundance would be "normal" if it is at the lower end. If the accretion is in a steady state (Koester 2009), the mass accretion rate for WD 1145+017 would be 4.3 × 1010 g s−1, among the highest of all polluted white dwarfs. The accretion needs to be on-going for 5 × 105 years to accumulate a total mass of 6.6 × 1023 g. It is very unlikely that one tidal disruption event can last that long (Veras et al. 2015). In this case, the material currently in the white dwarf's photosphere would be associated with a previous tidal disruption event. Alternatively, WD 1145+017 could be in the very early stage of tidal disruption and it is experiencing a short high-accretion burst. Evidence for such bursts have been speculated in the literature but never been directly detected (Farihi et al. 2012; Xu & Jura 2014). The mass accretion rate can go up to 1013 g s−1, approaching those of low accretion rate cataclysmic variables (Schmidt et al. 2007). In this scenario, the current tidal disruption event would have been on-going for 2000 yr. The heavy elements in WD 1145+017 could also come from a combination of the two scenarios. 3.2. Circumstellar Gas A large number of circumstellar absorption lines are detected, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. We are observing relatively cool circumstellar gas blocking part of the white dwarf's photosphere. The line profiles are broad, asymmetric and morphologically different from the narrow circumstellar features (that originate from ionization of the ISM) detected around hot white dwarfs (Holberg et al. 1995; Dickinson et al. 2012). They also differ from the symmetric blue-shifted Si IV absorption lines detected around PG 0843+517, which is attributed to the presence of hot circumstellar gas (Gansicke et al. 2012). Here, we present some qualitative analysis on the gas around WD 1145+017. The gravitational redshift is estimated to be 30 km s−1 at the surface of WD 1145+017. In the heliocentric frame, the average radial velocity of the photospheric lines is 42 ± 2 km s−1. We can derive the kinematic radial velocity of the white dwarf to be 12 km s−1. In the reference frame of the white dwarf, the full velocity at zeroth intensity of the circumstellar absorption line extends from -100 to 210 km s−1 (see Figure 2). This broad line profile can be produced by several gas streams moving in non-circular motions and they are likely associated with the disintegrating planetesimals. Otherwise, if the gas was in a circular motion, circumstellar absorption lines would be narrow and only have a radial velocity of ∼ -- 5 -- 12 km s−1 -- the kinematic radial velocity of the white dwarf. As shown in Table 2, most circumstellar lines have an equivalent width around 0.5 A even though the abundances and oscillator strengths vary by more than three orders of magnitude; the implication is that most of the circumstellar lines are optically thick. However, the lines of the trace constituent Mn might be optically thin because Mn II 3442.0 A2 and Mn II 3482.9 A arise from the same lower energy level but have different equivalent widths, which are in proportion to their oscillator strengths. We calculated a Mn II column density of 4.7 × 1013 cm−2. Assuming the circumstellar gas and the photosphere have the same elemental compositions, the Fe II column density N(Fe II) equals 3.7 × 1016 cm−2, leading to opaque lines. We can also estimate the excitation temperature, which is ∼ a few thousand Kelvins. The heating mechanism might be similar to the Z II region model described in Melis et al. (2010). As shown in Figure 2, all the circumstellar lines have about the same depth, indicating ∼ 15% of the white dwarf's photosphere is covered by gas, which has a vertical thickness h = 0.15 × 2Rwd = 2700 km (Rwd from Vanderburg et al. (2015)). If the radial extent of the gas goes to the tidal radius (∼ 100 Rwd), the total mass of Fe II in the gas disk can be estimated as: M (Fe II) = 2π × 100Rwd × h × N (Fe II) × m(Fe) (1) where m(Fe) is the mass of one Fe atom. The total mass of Fe II gas is 1.0 × 1015 g. Assuming the mass fraction of Fe II is 25%, the total gas mass Mgas would be 4.2 × 1015 g. If gas is being accreted at V = 210 km s−1 -- the maximum observed radial velocity -- we can derive a maximum accretion rate M as M = Mgas × V 100Rwd = 1.0 × 1012g s−1 (2) This value is higher than the mass accretion rate onto the white dwarf's photosphere under the steady state assumption (4.3 × 1010 g s−1). The accretion is likely to be a sporadic process. The gas lifetime can be calculated by dividing the total disk mass by the total accretion rate and it is only ∼ 1 hr. The gas must be constantly replenished. In addition, no variability was observed in the circumstellar absorption lines by comparing our 2As shown in Figure 2, there is also a nearby Fe I line at 3442.3 A. However, the Fe I line is unlikely to have circumstellar absorption due to its low oscillating strength (f=0.008). -- 6 -- 3 separate HIRES and 2 separate ESI observations, indicating a relatively smooth azimuthal distribution. There are at least two ways to generate circumstellar gas. (i) Sublimation from the disrupting planetesimals (Rappaport et al. 2012). The planetesimal's surface can be heated to have a high-Z atmosphere and for planetesimals around WD 1145+017, the mass loss would be in a free streaming limit (Vanderburg et al. 2015). This scenario is very simi- lar to the outgassing of a cometary nuclei when it gets close to the Sun (e.g. Keller et al. 1986). However, the thermal speed is only ∼ 1 km s−1 and it cannot explain the velocity dispersion of 300 km s−1. (ii) Collisions among the planetesimals. If the tidal disruption event resembles the encounter of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter (Benner & McKin- non 1995), there could exist a stream of disintegrating planetesimals in an eccentric orbit with the periastron inside the white dwarf's tidal radius. The observed velocity dispersion might represent different post-collision speeds. This is further supported by the broad and asymmetric circumstellar line profile. 3.3. Origin of the Infrared Excess WD 1145+017 belongs to a subgroup of polluted white dwarfs that show a strong infrared excess from a dust disk. However, the dust disk appears to be misaligned with the circumstellar gas and the transiting planetesimals (Vanderburg et al. 2015). Here, we discuss several possibilities. A puffed-up dust disk. We assume the dust particles at the outer edge 100Rwd have a vertical speed of 30 km s−1, a small fraction of the observed spread in the radial velocity of the circumstellar gas. The dust can travel to a vertical heigh of 10 Rwd, which is sufficient to produce the infrared excess. A precessing dust disk. At least one more object (very likely a planet) is required to be present in the system to perturb the planetesimal into the white dwarf's tidal radius. If the orbital plane of the planet and the dust disk are not aligned, the planet could induce significant precession on the dust disk. In this case, we would expect the infrared flux to vary gradually. A previous generation dust disk. The dust disk can be produced by a previous tidal disruption event, possibly associated with the one that also polluted the white dwarf's at- mosphere. The lifetime of a dust disk is estimated to be between 105 to 107 yr (e.g. Barber et al. 2012). Jura (2008) suggested that a new coming object would have a different orbital inclination and mutual collisions can lead to partial evaporation or even total disruption of -- 7 -- the dust disk. This scenario is further supported by the discovery of rapid changes in the dust and gas disk around polluted white dwarfs (Xu & Jura 2014; Wilson et al. 2014). WD 1145+017 could be a precursor to these systems. 4. Conclusions WD 1145+017 is in a unique stage that has a polluted atmosphere, a dust disk, cool circumstellar gas and multiple transiting planetesimals. In conclusion: • We have detected 11 heavy elements in the photosphere. The composition of the ac- creted planetesimal is similar to those observed in other polluted white dwarfs. The heavy elements could either come from a burst of accretion induced by the disintegrat- ing planetesimals, a previous tidal disruption event, or both. • We have uniquely detected ∼ 70 circumstellar absorption lines from 8 ions. They have very broad asymmetric profiles with velocity dispersion ∼ 300 km s−1. The gas lifetime is very short and must be constantly replenished, possibly by collisions among the disrupting planetesimals. • The infrared excess could come from either a puffed-up dust disk, a precessing dust disk or a previous generation of dust disk. We thank N. Mahesh for helping with the HIRES observing run. This work has been partly supported by the NSF. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. -- 8 -- Table 1: Photospheric absorption lines and abundance determination Ion log n(Z)/n(He) -4.7 ± 0.1 < -4.3 -4.3 ± 0.5 -5.49 ± 0.13 -6.74 ± 0.14 -5.69 ± 0.09 -6.57 ± 0.12 -8.04 ± 0.19 -8.7: -7.31 ± 0.12 -8.25 ± 0.20 -5.35 ± 0.11 -6.24 ± 0.18 H C O Mg Al Si Ca Ti V: Cr Mn Fe Ni total ta (105 yr) ... 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.0 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 M c ( 108 g s−1) ... Mb (1020 g) ... < 3200 < 170 4300 410 26 300 58 2.3 0.57 14 1.7 1300 180 6600 240 24 1.6 19 5.1 0.22 0.054 1.2 0.15 120 16 430 Notes. a Diffusion time out of the convection zone, following Dufour et al. (2012). b Current mass in the white dwarf's convection zone. c Accretion rate assuming a steady state (Koester 2009). The following lines are free from circumstellar absorption and used for abundance de- terminations: H I 4861.3 A, 6562.8 A; C I 4267.3 A; O I 7775 Ad, 8446.4 Ad; Mg I 3829.4 A, 5172.7 A, 5183.6 A; Mg II 4481.1 Ae, 7877.1 Ad, 7896.0 Ad, 7896.4 Ad; Al II 3586.5 A, 3587.0 A, 3961.5 A, 4663.1 A; Si II 3853.7 A, 3856.0 A, 3862.6 A, 4128.1 A, 4130.9 A, 5041.0 A, 5056.0 A, 6347.1 A, 6371.4 A; Ca II 3158.97 A, 3181.37 A, 3706.07 A, 3736.97 A, 8498.07 Ad, 8542.17 Ad; Ti II 3239.0 A, 3261.6 A,3329.5 A, 3504.9 A; V II, 3271.1 A; Cr II 3125.0 A, 3180.7 A, 3217.4 A; Mn II, 3482.9 A; Fe I, 3165.9 A, 3565.4 A, 3570.1 A, 3606.7 A, 3608.9 A, 3618.8 A, 3631.5 A, 3719.9 A, 3721.6 A, 3749.5 A, 3758.2 A, 3815.8 A,3820.4 A, 3825.9 A, 3859.9 A, 4063.6 A, 4071.7 A, 4307.9 A; Fe II, 3144.8 A, 3177.5 A, 3180.2 A, 3183.1 A, 3186.7 A, 3237.8 A, 3266.9 A, 4635.3 A, 4923.9 A, 5260.3 A, 6456.4 Ad; Ni I, 3524.5 A; Ni II, 3374.0 A, 3471.4 A. (d This line is only detected in the ESI data and is given less weight. e This line is blended. ) -- 9 -- Table 2:: Circumstellar lines in WD 1145+017 Ion Mg I Mg I Ca IId Ca IId Ca IId Ti II Ti II Ti II Ti II Cr II Cr II Cr II Cr II Cr II Cr II Cr II Mn II Mn II Fe I Fe I Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II λa (A) 3832.3 3838.3 3933.7 3968.5 8542.1 3341.9 3685.2 3761.3 3759.3 3125.0 3132.1 3368.1 3403.3 3408.8 3422.7 3433.3 3442.0 3482.9 3581.2 3734.9 3281.3 3295.8 3227.7 4173.5 4178.9 4233.2 4303.2 4351.8 4583.8 4629.3 4555.9 4515.3 4522.6 4508.3 Elow (eV) 2.7 2.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 1.8 1.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 f Nc (1012 cm−2) 0.45 > 0.9 0.5 > 3 0.68 >11 0.33 > 17 0.02 > 18 0.38 >8 0.13 >10 0.26 >3 0.2 >5 0.31 >17 0.33 >15 0.10 >31 0.043 >46 0.051 >96 0.064 >51 0.047 >43 0.05 >46 0.029 < 0.15 <48 0.23 0.19 0.0004 0.0003 0.018 0.0012 0.0006 0.0018 0.0006 0.0014 0.0012 0.0005 0.0005 0.0007 0.0017 0.0009 > 4.6 > 8.6 >9900 >13000 >390 >840 >2000 >1600 >1900 >1500 >2700 >2700 >3100 >1500 >1300 >1700 EWb (A) 0.05 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.13 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 -- 10 -- f Table 2 -- Continued EWb (A) 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.017 0.001 0.0002 0.0013 0.0008 0.0011 0.031 0.0024 0.0034 0.013 0.003 0.008 0.0059 0.0033 0.0036 0.0059 0.0015 Elow (eV) 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.2 0.2 3.1 3.1 4.0 Ion Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Fe II Ni II Ni II Ni II Ni II λa (A) 5169.0 4549.5 5316.6 5276.0 5234.6 5197.6 3154.2 3167.9 3289.4 3135.4 3323.1 3162.8 3493.5 3513.9 3769.5 3576.8 4067.0 Nc (1012 cm−2) >200 >2700 >9100 >1100 >1600 >1100 >180 >280 >770 >420 >1400 >920 >670 >1400 >280 >510 >370 Notes. This is a selection of relatively strong and unblended circumstellar lines. For each ion, they are arranged in terms of increasing lower energy level. a Wavelength is listed in air. b The equivalent width is measured from a direct integral of the flux below the continuum. This value is usually dominated by the circumstellar line because the strength of the photo- spheric line is much weaker. c N is the column density of the ion, following equation 3-48 in Spitzer (1978). d The observed Ca lines are much stronger than the best-fit model considering all Ca lines. We conclude that they have a circumstellar contribution. The equivalent width is measured from the spectra that excludes photospheric Ca line, i.e. the magenta line Figure 2. -- 11 -- Fig. 1. -- Portion of the Keck spectra. The black and blue lines represent the HIRES and ESI data, respectively. The red line is our best fit model to the photospheric lines. They are all plotted in the heliocentric reference frame. We have detected numerous photospheric and circumstellar absorption lines. -- 12 -- Fig. 2. -- Similar to Figure 1 except in velocity space in the white dwarf's reference frame. The magenta line represents data minus model -- there exists circumstellar absorption pro- duced by the gas between us and the white dwarf. All the photospheric lines have a velocity of 30 km s−1 due to the gravitational redshift. The circumstellar lines are very asymmetric and extend from -100 km s−1 to 210 km s−1. -- 13 -- Fig. 3. -- The mass fraction of an element relative to Si in the extrasolar asteroid accreted onto WD 1145+017. The values are normalized to the ratios in CI chondrites (Wasson & Kallemeyn 1988). For example, a CI-chondrite analog would lie along the black dashed line. Two models are presented and the error bar is only shown for the instantaneous model. Within the uncertainties, the overall abundance pattern in the object accreted onto WD 1145+017 is similar to that in CI chondrites. 10001100120013001400150016001700Condensation Temperature (K)012345678m(X)/m(Si)Accreted/CIOAlCaTiV:CrMnNiMgFesteady-stateinstantaneous -- 14 -- REFERENCES Barber, S. D., Patterson, A. J., Kilic, M., Leggett, S. K., Dufour, P., Bloom, J. S., & Starr, D. L. 2012, ApJ, 760, 26 Benner, L. A. M. & McKinnon, W. B. 1995, Icarus, 118, 155 Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., Dufour, P., & et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 28 Croll, B., Dalba, P. A., Vanderburg, A., Eastman, J., Rappaport, S., DeVore, J., Bieryla, A., Muirhead, P. S., Han, E., Latham, D. W., Beatty, T. G., Wittenmyer, R. A., Wright, J. T., Johnson, J. A., & McCrady, N. 2015, ArXiv e-prints Debes, J. H., Kilic, M., Faedi, F., Shkolnik, E. L., Lopez-Morales, M., Weinberger, A. J., Slesnick, C., & West, R. G. 2012, ApJ, 754, 59 Dickinson, N. J., Barstow, M. A., Welsh, B. Y., Burleigh, M., Farihi, J., Redfield, S., & Unglaub, K. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1397 Dufour, P., Kilic, M., Fontaine, G., Bergeron, P., Melis, C., & Bochanski, J. 2012, ApJ, 749, 6 Farihi, J., Gansicke, B. T., Wyatt, M. C., Girven, J., Pringle, J. E., & King, A. R. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 464 Friedrich, S., Koester, D., Christlieb, N., Reimers, D., & Wisotzki, L. 2000, A&A, 363, 1040 Gansicke, B. T., Koester, D., Farihi, J., Girven, J., Parsons, S. G., & Breedt, E. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 333 Gansicke, B. T., Marsh, T. R., Southworth, J., & Rebassa-Mansergas, A. 2006, Science, 314, 1908 Holberg, J. B., Bruhweiler, F. C., & Andersen, J. 1995, ApJ, 443, 753 Jura, M. 2008, AJ, 135, 1785 Jura, M. & Young, E. D. 2014, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 42, 45 Keller, H. U., Arpigny, C., Barbieri, C., Bonnet, R. M., Cazes, S., Coradini, M., Cosmovici, C. B., Delamere, W. A., Huebner, W. F., Hughes, D. W., Jamar, C., Malaise, D., Reitsema, H. J., Schmidt, H. U., Schmidt, W. K. H., Seige, P., Whipple, F. L., & Wilhelm, K. 1986, Nature, 321, 320 -- 15 -- Kilic, M., von Hippel, T., Leggett, S. K., & Winget, D. E. 2006, ApJ, 646, 474 Klein, B., Jura, M., Koester, D., Zuckerman, B., & Melis, C. 2010, ApJ, 709, 950 Koester, D. 2009, A&A, 498, 517 Koester, D., Gansicke, B. T., & Farihi, J. 2014, A&A, 566, A34 Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220 Melis, C., Dufour, P., Farihi, J., Bochanski, J., Burgasser, A. J., Parsons, S. G., Gansicke, B. T., Koester, D., & Swift, B. J. 2012, ApJ, 751, L4 Melis, C., Jura, M., Albert, L., Klein, B., & Zuckerman, B. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1078 Rappaport, S., Levine, A., Chiang, E., El Mellah, I., Jenkins, J., Kalomeni, B., Kite, E. S., Kotson, M., Nelson, L., Rousseau-Nepton, L., & Tran, K. 2012, ApJ, 752, 1 Schmidt, G. D., Szkody, P., Henden, A., Anderson, S. F., Lamb, D. Q., Margon, B., & Schneider, D. P. 2007, ApJ, 654, 521 Sheinis, A. I., Bolte, M., Epps, H. W., & et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 851 Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium Vanderburg, A., Johnson, J. A., Rappaport, S., & et al. 2015, Nature, in press Veras, D., Leinhardt, Z. M., Eggl, S., & Gansicke, B. T. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3453 Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., & et al. 1994, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 2198, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. D. L. Crawford & E. R. Craine, 362 Voss, B., Koester, D., Napiwotzki, R., Christlieb, N., & Reimers, D. 2007, A&A, 470, 1079 Wasson, J. T. & Kallemeyn, G. W. 1988, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 325, 535 Wilson, D. J., Gansicke, B. T., Koester, D., Raddi, R., Breedt, E., Southworth, J., & Parsons, S. G. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1878 Xu, S. & Jura, M. 2014, ApJ, 792, L39 Xu, S., Jura, M., Koester, D., Klein, B., & Zuckerman, B. 2014, ApJ, 783, 79 -- 16 -- Zuckerman, B., Koester, D., Reid, I. N., & Hunsch, M. 2003, ApJ, 596, 477 Zuckerman, B., Melis, C., Klein, B., Koester, D., & Jura, M. 2010, ApJ, 722, 725 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
0905.4688	1	0905	2009-05-28T16:14:25	A possible architecture of the planetary system HR 8799	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	HR8799 is a nearby A-type star with a debris disk and three planetary candidates recently imaged directly. We undertake a coherent analysis of various portions of observational data on all known components of the system. The goal is to elucidate the architecture and evolutionary status of the system. We try to further constrain the age and orientation of the system, orbits and masses of the companions, as well as the location of dust. From the high luminosity of debris dust and dynamical constraints, we argue for a rather young system's age of <50Myr. The system must be seen nearly, but not exactly, pole-on. Our analysis of the stellar rotational velocity yields an inclination of 13-30deg, whereas i>20deg is needed for the system to be dynamically stable, which suggests a probable inclination range of 20-30deg. The spectral energy distribution is naturally reproduced with two dust rings associated with two planetesimal belts. The inner "asteroid belt" is located at ~10AU inside the orbit of the innermost companion and a "Kuiper belt" at >100AU is just exterior to the orbit of the outermost companion. The dust masses in the inner and outer ring are estimated to be ~1E-05 and 4E-02 M_earth, respectively. We show that all three planetary candidates may be stable in the mass range suggested in the discovery paper by Marois et al. 2008 (between 5 and 13 Jupiter masses), but only for some of all possible orientations. Stable orbits imply a double (4:2:1) mean-motion resonance between all three companions. We finally show that in the cases where the companions themselves are orbitally stable, the dust-producing planetesimal belts are also stable against planetary perturbations.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. paper July 13, 2018 © ESO 2018 A possible architecture of the planetary system HR 8799 Martin Reidemeister1, Alexander V. Krivov1, Tobias O. B. Schmidt1, Simone Fiedler1, Sebastian Muller1, Torsten Lohne1, and Ralph Neuhauser1 Astrophysikalisches Institut, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena, Schillergasschen 2–3, 07745 Jena, Germany Received March 12, 2009; accepted May 20, 2009 ABSTRACT HR8799 is a nearby A-type star with a debris disk and three planetary candidates recently imaged directly. We undertake a coherent analysis of various portions of observational data on all known components of the system, including the central star, imaged compan- ions, and dust. The goal is to elucidate the architecture and evolutionary status of the system. We try to further constrain the age and orientation of the system, orbits and masses of the companions, as well as the location of dust. From the high luminosity of debris dust and dynamical constraints, we argue for a rather young system's age of <∼ 50 Myr. The system must be seen nearly, but not exactly, pole-on. Our analysis of the stellar rotational velocity yields an inclination of 13 – 30◦, whereas i >∼ 20◦ is needed for the system to be dynamically stable, which suggests a probable inclination range of 20 – 30◦. The spectral energy distribution, including the Spitzer/IRS spectrum in the mid-infrared as well as IRAS, ISO, JCMT and IRAM observations, is naturally reproduced with two dust rings associated with two planetesimal belts. The inner "asteroid belt" is located at ∼ 10 AU inside the orbit of the innermost companion and a "Kuiper belt" at >∼ 100 AU is just exterior to the orbit of the outermost companion. The dust masses in the inner and outer ring are estimated to be ≈ 1 × 10−5 and 4 × 10−2 Earth masses, respectively. We show that all three planetary candidates may be stable in the mass range suggested in the discovery paper by Marois et al. 2008 (between 5 and 13 Jupiter masses), but only for some of all possible orientations. For (Mb, Mc, Md) = (5, 7, 7) Jupiter masses, an inclination i >∼ 20◦ is required and the line of nodes of the system's symmetry plane on the sky must lie within 0◦ to 50◦ from north eastward. For higher masses (Mb, Mc, Md) from (7, 10, 10) to (11, 13, 13), the constraints on both angles are even more stringent. Stable orbits imply a double (4:2:1) mean-motion resonance between all three companions. We finally show that in the cases where the companions themselves are orbitally stable, the dust-producing planetesimal belts are also stable against planetary perturbations. Key words. planetary systems: formation – circumstellar matter – celestial mechanics – stars: individual: HR 8799. 1. Introduction HR 8799 is an A5V star located at ≈ 40 pc away from Earth, around which three planetary candidates1 have recently been im- aged (Marois et al. 2008). All three objects have been shown to be co-moving with the star. For two of them, also a differential proper motion consistent with the orbital motion of a compan- ion around the star has been detected. The presence of the outer- most companion has recently been confirmed by Lafreni`ere et al. (2009) through analysis of archival HST/NICMOS data from 1998 and by Fukagawa et al. (2009) with SUBARU/CIAO data from 2002. No further companions with masses greater than 3MJup (Jupiter masses) within 600 AU from the star have been found (Close & Males 2009). Three imaged companions are located at projected distances from 24 to 68 AU from the star and presumably have masses of the order of 7–10 Jupiter masses, although the mass determination is based solely on untested evolutionary models and an assumption that the sys- tem's age lies in the range 30–160 Myr. First dynamical analyses (Fabrycky & Murray-Clay 2008; Go´zdziewski & Migaszewski Send requests [email protected] offprint to: A.V. Krivov, e-mail: 1 For the sake of brevity, we often call them "planets" throughout this paper. This comes with the warning that the often used definition of an "extrasolar planet" as a star-orbiting body with mass under the deuterium burning limit remains controversial. Furthermore, it is not possible at present to completely exclude the possibility that the mass of at least one companion in the HR8799 system lies above that limit, although this appears rather unlikely. 2009) show that, with the current estimates of planetary masses and the assumption that true orbital separations of the planets are close to projected distances, the stability of the system on timescales comparable to the stellar age is not obvious. Still, the system can be stable, as it likely is, for instance if the planets are locked in resonances and/or the planetary masses are lower than estimated. Apart from planets, HR 8799 has long been known to har- bor cold circumstellar dust responsible for excess emission in the far-infrared discovered by IRAS (Sadakane & Nishida 1986; Zuckerman & Song 2004; Rhee et al. 2007). The rather strong infrared excess has been also confirmed with ISO/ISOPHOT measurements (Mo´or et al. 2006). Additionally, Spitzer/IRS measurements revealed warm dust emission in the mid-infrared (Jura et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2006). Both cold and warm dust emission must be indicative of one or more dust-producing plan- etesimal belts, similar to the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt and possi- bly, the asteroid belt in the solar system. Altogether, there ap- pears to be an emerging view of a complex, multi-component planetary system with several planets, planetesimal belts, and dust. Given the fact that the planets have been discovered very re- cently, it is not surprising that our knowledge of the system is very poor and that even the key parameters of the system and its components remain vaguely known. A large uncertainty in the system's age amplifies the difficulty of inferring accurate masses of the companions from evolutionary models, and the mass es- timates vary from one model to another even for the same age. While there are clear indications that the system is seen nearly 2 Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 pole-on, the exact orientation of its symmetry plane is not known either, which makes it impossible to convert projected astrocen- tric distances of planets into their true positions. The differential proper motion was measured with a reasonable accuracy only for the outer planets, and even in that case the accuracy is not yet sufficient to constrain orbital eccentricities. As far as the dust is concerned, the debris disk remains unresolved, offering no possi- bility to better recover the orientation of the system's plane. Even the photometry data are scarce. This results in a poor knowledge of the dust distribution. Obviously, most of these issues could only be resolved with new observational data, some of which may come promptly, while some others may require longer time spans. However, al- ready at the current stage, we find it reasonable to reanalyze the available data. While the discovery paper by Marois et al. (2008) mostly concentrates on the planets themselves and the first "follow-up" publications (Fabrycky & Murray-Clay 2008; Go´zdziewski & Migaszewski 2009) provide an in-depth analysis of dynamical stability issues, in this paper we try to paint a more synthetic view of the planetary system around HR 8799 with all its components - central star, planets, and dust-producing plan- etesimal belts. Section 2 focuses on the stellar properties, notably the stellar age (section 2.1) and inclination of the rotation axis, assumed to coincide with the inclination of the whole system (section 2.2). In Section 3, we analyze the observed spectral energy distribu- tion (SED, section 3.1) and try to fit the data with several dust belts (section 3.2). Section 4 treats presumed planets and tries to constrain their masses both from evolutionary models (section 4.1) and dynamical stability requirement (section 4.2). Section 5 checks whether planetesimal belts, as found to fit the infrared photometry, would be dynamically stable against planetary per- turbations. Section 6 contains our conclusions and a discussion. 2. The central star 2.1. Age Marois et al. (2008) give an age of 30 to 160 Myr for HR 8799 and hence its companions, considering several age indicators. While most of the indicators support a rather younger age, few of them still allow for an older age or even suggest it. One indica- tor is the galactic space motion (UVW) of the primary, which is similar to that of close young associations (Marois et al. 2008). Using these data, Mo´or et al. (2006) propose HR 8799 to be a member of the Local Association at an age of 20 to 150 Myr with a probability of 62 %. Another method is the position of HR 8799 in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Taking into ac- count the low luminosity of the star (after correction for its low metallicity) as well as the UVW space motion, Rhee et al. (2007) arrived at an age of 30 Myr. Marois et al. (2008) further note that λ Bootis stars are gen- erally thought to be young, up to a few 100 Myr. However, the Hipparcos mission has shown that the well established λ Bootis stars of the Galactic field comprise the whole range from the Zero Age Main Sequence to the Terminal Age Main Sequence, which is ∼ 1 Gyr for an A-type star (Turcotte 2002; Paunzen 2001, and references therein). The best indicator for a rather older age is the location of HR 8799 in a Teff vs. log g diagram derived from published uvbyβ photometry. Using this method, Song et al. (2001) find an age of 50 to 1128 Myr with a best estimate of 732 Myr and Chen et al. (2006) an age of 590 Myr. An independent argument in favor of a rather younger age may come from the the dust portion of the system. The mea- sured infrared excess ratio of ∼ 100 at 60 –90 µm (see Fig. 1 below) would be typical of a debris disk star with the age of <∼ 50 Myr (see Su et al. 2006, their Fig. 5). However, this ar- gument is purely statistical and must be taken with caution. For instance, one cannot exclude the possibility that the formation of such a planetary system with three massive planets in very wide orbits could trace back to an exceptionally dense and large pro- toplanetary disk. The latter might leave, as a by-product, a more massive debris disk on the periphery, whose fractional luminos- ity might be well above the statistically expected level. Altogether, there seem to be more arguments to advocate a younger age of the system of the order of several tens of Myr. On any account, as pointed out in the discovery paper by Marois et al. (2008) and is further discussed in section 4 below, extremely old ages would inevitably imply high object masses in the brown dwarf range - for all the evolutionary models used to infer the masses. Fabrycky & Murray-Clay (2008) have shown that dynamical stability of such a system is problematic. It can be stable for masses up to 20 Jupiter masses, but only for very special orbital configurations. 2.2. Rotationalperiodandinclination As summarized by Sadakane (2006) the Vega-like, γ Doradus type pulsator HR 8799 is showing λ Bootis-like abundances. He concludes that for the case of HR 8799, which is known to be a single star and associated with a dusty disk, the scenario invok- ing the process of selective accretion of circumstellar or inter- stellar material depleted in refractory elements, seems to be the favorable explanation for the unusually low abundances. The fact that HR 8799 is a γ Doradus type pulsator makes it hard to find an indisputable rotational period. However, sev- eral authors give a value of ∼ 0.51 days (e.g. Rodriguez & Zerbi 1995). Zerbi et al. (1999) found from a multisite campaign three independent frequencies (0.5053 d, 0.5791 d, 0.6061 d) and a coupling term between them (4.0339 d). All of these frequen- cies could be independent pulsational modes. However, if one of these frequencies corresponds to the rotational period of the star, we are able to calculate the inclination i of its rotational axis. frequencies (Allende Prieto & Lambert From the possible rotational (0.5053 d, 0.5791 d, 0.6061 d) and from the radius of HR 8799 of 1.6 R⊙ (Pasinetti Fracassini et al. 2001), we determine the possi- ble range of the true rotational velocity v of the star of 110–160 km s−1. These values agree quite well with the median v sin i of A4–A6 main sequence stars of 159 ± 7.2 km s−1 (Royer et al. 2007). On the other hand, the projected rotational velocity v sin i of HR 8799 was measured by several authors to be between 35.5 km s−1 and 55 km s−1 (e.g. Kaye & Strassmeier 1998; Uesugi & Fukuda 1982). From v and v sin i, we finally derive a possible range of the inclination of the star of 13◦–30◦. Note that in the above estimates we excluded the 4.0339-day period as this would lead to sin i > 1. 1.32 R⊙ 1999) to It can be expected that the rotational equator of the star and the planetary orbits are all aligned with each other. Spin- orbit alignment is a common assumption, consistent for instance with the data of most transiting planets (e.g. Fabrycky & Winn 2009). It has also been confirmed for Fomalhaut and its disk (Le Bouquin et al. 2009). Nonetheless, a misalignment on the order of several degrees is likely. It is exemplified by our own system, in which the Jupiter orbit is tilted by ∼ 7◦ to the solar equator and the orbital planes of giant planets differ from each other by a few degrees. With this caveat, we make an assumption of the perfect alignment throughout the paper. This assumption Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 3 is particularly needed to reduce the complexity of our dynamical stability studies presented below. An additional argument in favor of a low inclination of the whole system comes from the fact that the measured proper mo- tion of the companions relative to the star is also consistent with a nearly pole-on view onto the system (Marois et al. 2008). The most recent astrometric analysis by Lafreni`ere et al. (2009) fur- ther supports this conclusion. Their best fits with circular or- bits suggest the semimajor axis a ∼ 68–74 AU and the incli- nation i ∼ 13◦–23◦ for the orbit of the outermost companion, HR 8799 b. 3. Dust and planetesimal belts 3.1. ObservedSED Table 1 lists the catalogs and references used to provide the opti- cal, infrared, sub-mm and millimeter photometry. We employed the Hipparcos and Tycho databases as well as USNO and GSC catalogs to compile the optical photometry, whereas the near- infrared data were taken from the 2MASS survey. The mid- and far-infrared photometry is provided by the IRAS and ISO satel- lites, while sub-mm and millimeter data were obtained at JCMT and IRAM. For transforming the B, V, R, I magnitudes into units of flux [Jy] we used the standard calibration system of Johnson, whereas in case of the 2MASS J, H, Ks bands the calibrations of Cohen et al. (2003) were applied. For the IRAS fluxes a color- correction factor (Beichman et al. 1988) assuming a black body spectral energy distribution for a temperature of 5000 K was em- ployed2. The optical and near-infrared photometry was used to de- rive a best-fit photospheric model. We estimated the stellar pho- tospheric fluxes by minimum χ2 fitting of NextGen model at- mospheres (Hauschildt et al. 1999), using only bandpasses with wavelengths shorter than 3 µm, where no excess emission is ex- pected. In our search for the best fit we employed a system of NextGen models with an effective temperature step size of 200 K, with a log g of 4.5, and with solar metallicity3. Varying the temperature as well as the stellar radius, which affects the solid angle dilution factor, we derive a best-fit temperature of 7400 K and a best-fit radius of 1.34 R⊙, both in a very good agreement with the results of Gray & Kaye (1999). In order to obtain more information on the dust compo- nent of the system, we extracted publicly available IRS data for HR8799 from the Spitzer archive with the Leopard soft- ware (http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irs/). Those data were taken in December 2003 under AOR 3565568 and originally published by Chen et al. (2006). Using the post-basic correction data pro- vided by the standard IRS pipeline, we first subtracted the zo- diacal light background estimated by the SPOT software. Then we joined the datasets for the individual IRS modules and orders and subtracted a simple Rayleigh-Jeans stellar photosphere in the wavelength region of interest, assuming now that there is no excess at 8 µm where the IRS spectrum starts. For plotting and fitting purposes, the scatter in the resulting dust spectrum was reduced by taking averages over 4 neighboring data points. This increases the signal-to-noise ratio without lowering the spectral resolution, which remains constrained by the instrumental value R ∼ 60–120. Spurious features at the edges of the spectral orders around 14 and 20 µm were removed. The resulting spectrum shows a somewhat (by ≈ 40%) weaker excess than that by Chen et al. (2006), especially be- tween 20 and 30 µm. One possible origin of this discrepancy is the approach used for background subtraction. In addition, both spectra fall well below the IRAS upper limits at 25 µm but also by several σ below the IRAS 12 µm faint-source and point-source measurements. The easiest way to reduce this scal- ing uncertainty would be using a good photometry point in the mid-infrared. Unfortunately, a 24 µm Spitzer/MIPS point, which would ideally serve for this purpose, is not yet available in the Spitzer archive, although these data have recently been taken (Kate Su, pers. comm). Whether the maximum at around 11 µm is a silicate feature is unclear. Definite conclusions would require a longer exposure time and a higher spectral resolution. The resulting set of photometry points and the IRS spectrum are shown in Fig. 1 (with photosphere) and in Fig. 2 (excess emission only). Table 1. Photometry of HR8799. IRAS fluxes are color cor- rected as described in the IRAS Explanatory Supplement (Beichman et al. 1988). Photometric band B B B B V V V R I J H Ks IRAS PSC 12 µm IRAS PSC 25 µm IRAS PSC 60 µm IRAS PSC 100 µm IRAS FSC 12 µm IRAS FSC 25 µm IRAS FSC 60 µm IRAS FSC 100 µm ISO 60 µm ISO 90 µm JCMT 850 µm JCMT 1100 µm IRAM 1200 µm Flux or magnitude [mag] 6.090 ± 0.300 6.196 6.210 ± 0.010 6.214 ± 0.009 5.960 ± 0.010 5.959 5.960 ± 0.010 5.810 ± 0.300 5.690 ± 0.300 5.383 ± 0.027 5.280 ± 0.018 5.240 ± 0.018 [Jy] 0.267 ± 0.034 0.246 ± 0.000 0.307 ± 0.061 2.376 ± 0.000 0.278 ± 0.036 0.174 ± 0.075 0.311 ± 0.062 3.202 ± 0.977 0.412 ± 0.021 0.585 ± 0.041 [mJy] 10.3 ± 1.8 < 33 4.8 ± 2.7 Fqual (IRAS) Ref. (1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (2) (3) (1) (1) (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (9) (10) (10) 3 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 References: (1) The USNO-B1.0 Catalog (Monet et al. 2003); (2) NOMAD Catalog (Zacharias et al. 2004), from Tycho-2 Catalog (Høg et al. 2000); (3) The Guide Star Catalog, Version 2.3.2 (Lasker et al. 2008); (4) The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (Perryman & ESA 1997); (5) 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Skrutskie et al. 2006); (6) IRAS catalogue of Point Sources, Version 2.0 (Helou & Walker 1988); (7) IRAS Faint Source Catalog, b > 10, Version 2.0 (Moshir et al. 1990); (8) (Mo´or et al. 2006) (9) (Williams & Andrews 2006) (10) (Sylvester et al. 1996) 3.2. Interpretation 2 Correction factors are only available over a coarse temperature grid . . . , 5000 K, 10000 K. 3 Although the metallicity of HR8799 is −0.47 (Gray & Kaye 1999), this parameter has no important effect on the fitting result. To get a rough idea of the location of the dust belt(s) and the amount of dust in the HR8799 system, we modeled the SED assuming a double power-law surface number density of dust N ∝ s−qr−ξ, where s and r are the dust grain size and distance Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 4 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 ] y J [ x u l f r o r r e . l e r IRS spectrum calibration, as discussed in section 3.1, which is a factor of several in dust mass. A question arises whether these fits are physically rea- sonable. In particular, it is not immediately clear whether the blowout particles are really needed to reproduce the observa- tions. Similar problems have already been encountered in stud- ies of other debris disks (e.g. around Vega, see Su et al. 2005). However, such inconsistencies can be overcome by consider- ing a complete dynamical treatment of the specific disk with- out significant changes in the disk location (Muller et al., in prep.). Further, our choice of power-law spatial and size dis- tributions is only a rough, albeit commonly used, approxima- tion. More elaborate dynamical studies (e.g. Krivov et al. 2006; Th´ebault & Augereau 2007) show clear deviations from this as- sumption, especially in the case of the dust size distribution where a wavy pattern arises from an underabundance of small particles induced by radiation blowout. Thus, we checked the impact of moderate variations in the slopes (0.1 ≤ ξ ≤ 1.9 and 2.5 ≤ q ≤ 4.5). It turned out that the slope of the spatial dis- tribution ξ has little effect on the results, moderately changing only the short-wavelength part in the SED from the inner dust ring. The size distribution slope q, however, affects the resulting emission appreciably. While for the inner ring the changes are still small (a steeper slope would amplify the silicate features at 10 and 20 µm whereas a shallower distribution would wash them out, just as expected), similar changes in the outer ring would require a strong compensation by altering other disk pa- rameters (which were fixed in our approach). The reason is that for the outer component both the rise and the fall of the SED are well constrained by photometric observations. They place tight constraints on the width of the SED, in contrast to the inner ring where only the short-wavelength part of the SED is known. Since dust in the outer ring is much colder than in the inner ring it is no longer the strength of the features but the width of the SED that is affected by a different slope in the size distribution: the steeper the distribution, the narrower the SED. On any account, for our purpose of determining the rough location and mass of dust the simple fitting approach used here is sufficient. Another question is, how well the edges of the outer and in- ner ring are constrained. To check this, we varied them and fitted the SED again, leaving the lower cutoff size and dust mass as free parameters. For the outer ring, we found reasonable fits with the inner edge between 75 and 120 AU and the outer edge between 125 and 170 AU (for q = 3.5 and ξ = 1). The outer edge in the inner ring can go from 15 down to 10 AU. In fact, the inner ring truncated at 10 AU provides even slightly better agreement with the IRS spectrum between 20 and 30 µm. However, due to the calibration uncertainties it is difficult to assess the accuracy of the fit, which leaves the outer edge of the inner ring rather un- constrained. The inner edge of the inner ring can be as close to the star as 2 AU to conform to the IRS spectrum. So far we have discussed dust rings in the system. However, the presence of a dust belt requires a belt of planetesimals that do not show up in the observations, but produce and sustain visible dust. Due to the radiation pressure effect, dust grains typically move in orbits with periastra at the planetesimal belt and apas- tra outside it. The smaller the grains, the farther out from the star they are spread. Thus the dust-producing planetesimal belt is expected to be narrower than the observed dust ring and to lie within the dust ring close to its inner edge (e.g. Krivov et al. 2006). Therefore, we can expect that the outer planetesimal belt is located at ∼ 75–120 AU and the inner planetesimal belt at 2–10 AU from the star. It is important to check whether the ex- pected locations of the outer and inner planetesimal belt are dy- 1 10 100 1000 1 10 wavelength [µm] 100 1000 Fig. 1. Spectral energy distribution of HR 8799. Circles are pho- tometric measurements, triangles are upper limits (Table 1). The black line between ≈ 5 and 40 µm is the Spitzer/IRS spectrum. Overlaid is the best-fit NextGen model (grey line) for the stel- lar photosphere. Its estimated relative error is plotted under the main panel. Table 2. Locations and names of the first-guess dust rings. ring location inside d between d and c between c and b outside b ring extension [AU] 3 – 15 28 – 32 45 – 60 75 – 125 name ring d ring cd ring bc ring b from the star, respectively. Keeping in mind that SED interpre- tation is a degenerate problem and to decrease the number of free parameters, we restrict ourselves to the case of q = 3.5 and ξ = 1. The dust composition was assumed to be astronomical silicate (Laor & Draine 1993). As the minimum grain size, we chose the radiation pressure blowout radius, which amounts to ≈ 5 µm for astrosilicate. The maximum grain radius, which has little effect on the results, was arbitrarily set to 1000 µm. At first, we modeled the SEDs that would arise from four hy- pothetical dust rings with arbitrarily chosen extensions, located inside the orbit of the innermost planet HR8799 d, between d and c, between c and b, and outside the orbit of the outermost planet HR8799 b (Table 2). Dust masses were chosen in such a way as to reproduce the 60 µm flux. The results are shown in Fig. 2. Comparison of the first-guess model SEDs with the available photometry and spectrometry observations reveals two issues. First, one single ring is not capable of reproducing the entire set of observations from the mid- to the far-infrared. Second, if the 10 µm silicate feature in the IRS spectrum is real, a substan- tial fraction of particles smaller than the blowout size will be required. Taking these discrepancies into account, we combined two rings, 'ring d' and 'ring b', and fitted the lower size cutoffs and dust masses to the observations. In our 'best fit' model, which is shown as solid line in Fig. 2, the minimum sizes are 2 and 6 µm and the dust masses are 1.4 × 10−5 M⊕ and 4.2 × 10−2 M⊕ for the inner and outer ring, respectively. As a word of caution, we remind that these estimates directly inherit the uncertainty of the Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 5 ring d ring cd ring bc ring b best fit 200 150 ] U A dynamical evolution of HR8799 with i=0o i [ s x a r o a m m e s j i 100 50 0 0 50 100 time [kyr] 150 200 Fig. 3. Instability of the planetary system with nominal masses in the non-inclined case. For each of the planets, three curves correspond to semimajor axes, pericentric distance, and apocen- tric distance. (2007) does not go beyond 10MJup. This explains why some po- sitions in the table are not filled. On the whole, the mass estimates we obtain are similar to those by Marois et al. (2008). The ages above ∼ 160 Myr would lead to "non-planetary" masses above the standard deuterium burning limit of 13.6MJup. On the other hand, none of the models predict masses below 3 − 5 (HR8799 b) and 6 − 8 (HR8799 c, d) Jupiter masses even for the youngest plausible ages of ∼ 20 Myr. 4.2. Massesfromstabilityrequirement The simplest possible assumption one can make is that the sys- tem is seen perfectly face-on (inclination i = 0) and that all three planets are initially in circular, co-planar orbits. However, as Fabrycky & Murray-Clay (2008) pointed out, such a system with masses reported in Marois et al. (2008) would be unsta- ble. This is readily confirmed by our numerical integrations that are described below. Fig. 3 shows the time evolution of the planetary orbits; already after 134 kyr a close encounter be- tween HR8799 c and d occurs and triggers instability of all three planets ending with the ejection of HR8799 c 50 kyr later. These timescales are fully consistent with those reported by Fabrycky & Murray-Clay (2008). The studies by Fabrycky & Murray-Clay (2008) and Go´zdziewski & Migaszewski (2009) were largely based on fit- ting simultaneously the observed positions and differential proper motion of the companions and checking the stability of the resulting systems in the course of their dynamical evolu- tion. Noting that constraints on eccentricities from the differen- tial proper motion are rather weak, but clear indications exist for inclined orbits from the rotational period analysis (see section 2.2), here we employ a different method. We confine our simula- tions to initially circular orbits (and let the eccentricities evolve to non-zero values at later times), but allow the symmetry plane to have all conceivable non-zero inclinations and an arbitrary orientation. Thus, for the subsequent analysis we introduce two angles (Fig. 4). One is the inclination i itself, measured between the angular momentum vector and a vector pointing toward the observer. Another angle is the longitude of node Ω of the sys- tem's symmetry plane on the plane of the sky, which is measured from north in the eastern direction. We vary the inclination i from ] ] ] y y y J J J m m m [ [ [ ν ν ν F F F 102 102 102 101 101 101 10 10 10 100 100 100 λ [µm] λ [µm] λ [µm] 1000 1000 1000 Fig. 2. Excess emission of HR 8799 in the infrared. The grey solid line is the IRS spectrum. The circles are the observed fluxes, and the triangles are upper limits. Dotted, short-dashed, dash-dotted, and long-dashed lines are the SEDs from the four first-guess dust rings (Table 2). The black solid line is our 'best fit'. namically compatible with the presence of the outermost and in- nermost planet, respectively. We will investigate this in section 5, trying to find additional constraints on the location of the two rings. 4. Planets 4.1. Massesfrommodels A common method to estimate masses of various astrophysical objects, from stars to planets, is to use their formation and evolu- tion models. Such models predict essential physical parameters of objects of various masses, notably their luminosity and tem- perature, as a function of age. If the age is known, a comparison with luminosity or temperature retrieved from observations al- lows one to estimate the mass. In the case of HR8799, the tem- perature of the companions is unknown, but their luminosity has been derived from brightness and distance with sufficient accu- racy to apply the models. Ages, masses, and other parameters of other directly imaged planet candidates were recently reviewed by Schmidt et al. (2009). However, all models involve simplifying assumptions and adopt certain initial conditions, e.g. the initial internal energy and temperature structure. Further, the so-called hot-start mod- els all start at a non-zero age (e.g., 0.1 or 1 Myr) with a finite luminosity and thus do not cover the actual formation stage. For these reasons, models may not deliver reliable results for at least the first several Myrs (see Wuchterl 2001; Chabrier et al. 2005, for discussion), if not several hundred Myrs (Stevenson 1982). Using the model by Baraffe et al. (2003) and assuming the age range of 30–160 Myr, Marois et al. (2008) estimated the masses of companions to be 7MJup (5–11MJup) for HR8799 b and 10MJup (7–13MJup) for HR 8799 c & d. We have recalculated possible masses of the three companions with the aid of several state-of-the-art hot-start evolutionary models from system's age and companions' luminosity. In so doing, we allowed a broader range of possible ages, as discussed in section 2.1. Table 3 shows the results. Note that some models give masses only for limited age and/or mass ranges; for instance, the model by Marley et al. 6 Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 Table 3. Masses of HR 8799 b / c / d from luminosity (and absolute K-band magnitude) using various evolutionary models. HR8799 b Model Burrows et al. (1997) Marley et al. (2007)a Chabrier et al. (2000) Baraffe et al. (2003) Baraffe et al. (2008)b Baraffe et al. (2003)c HR8799 c / d Model Burrows et al. (1997) Marley et al. (2007)a Chabrier et al. (2000) Baraffe et al. (2003) Baraffe et al. (2008)b Baraffe et al. (2003)d Luminosity log L/L⊙ = −5.1 ± 0.1 (Marois et al. 2008) Mass [MJup] at age 20 Myr 3.5 – 4.5 3 – 5 30 Myr 4.5 – 6 4 – 7 60 Myr 7 – 8.5 6 – 10 100 Myr 9 – 11 4 – 5 ∼ 5.5 6 – 7 ∼ 7 ∼ 8.5 9 – 10 ∼ 9 ∼ 10.5 160 Myr 11.5 – 12.5 590 Myr 22 – 26 730 Myr 25 – 30 1000 Myr 28 – 33 1128 Myr 30 – 36 21 – 26 21 – 26 ∼ 30 30 – 35 30 – 35 ∼ 38 Luminosity log L/L⊙ = −4.7 ± 0.1 (Marois et al. 2008) 20 Myr 6 – 7.5 6 – 8 30 Myr 7.5 – 9.5 8 – 10 6 – 7 6 – 7 ∼ 7.5 60 Myr 11 – 12 100 Myr 12.5 – 13 8 – 10 8 – 10 ∼ 9 ∼ 10.5 10 – 11 10 – 11 ∼ 11.5 Mass [MJup] at age 160 Myr 13 – 13.5 590 Myr 30 – 38 730 Myr 35 – 43 1000 Myr 40 – 48 1128 Myr 41 – 50 28 – 34 27 – 31 ∼ 38 39 – 46 37 – 43 ∼ 48 Remarks: All mass values were shortened to appropriate decimals and partly rounded to halves or integers of a Jupiter mass. (a) Hot-start models. (b) Non irradiated models. (c) Using MKs=14.05 ± 0.08 mag (Marois et al. 2008). (d) Using MKs ∼ 13.12 mag instead of slightly different values MKs=13.13 ± 0.08 mag for HR8799 c and MKs=13.11 ± 0.12 mag for HR8799 d, given in Marois et al. (2008). h t r a E o t System's angular momentum i n o d e s L i n e o f S ky plane S y s t e m ' s s y m m e t r y p l a n e N W E ] U A i [ s x a r o a m m e s j i 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 HR8799b HR8799c HR8799d 0 20 40 Hill sphere 80 100 120 140 160 180 60 rotation angle [deg] Fig. 4. Orientation of the system with respect to the line of sight. Fig. 5. Semimajor axes of HR8799b, c and d (solid lines) and their Hill radii for nominal masses (dashed) as a function of Ω for i = 30◦. 0◦ to 45◦, thus extending the range suggested by section 2.2 to higher values. This may be useful to accommodate a possible tilt of planetary orbits to the stellar equator. The rotation angle Ω is unconstrained by the observations. It is sufficient to vary it from 0◦ to 180◦, since the true mutual positions of all three plan- ets at (i, Ω) and (i, Ω + 180◦) would be exactly the same. For each (i, Ω)-pair we can convert the observed (projected) instan- taneous positions (astrocentric distances and positional angles) of the three planets into their true positions in space. If, further, initially circular orbits are assumed, the calculated distances of planets will coincide with their initial semimajor axes. We thus consider a two-parametric (i, Ω) set of possible systems; for each of them, the initial orbital configuration is fully and uniquely de- fined. Fig. 5 shows the astrocentric semimajor axes of the three planets with an inclination of i = 30◦ as a function of rotation angle Ω, as well as the corresponding Hill spheres for nominal planetary masses. Similarly, Fig. 6 depicts the initial semima- jor axis of the planets depending on i and Ω. Note that the recent analysis of HR8799 b by Lafreni`ere et al. (2009), which is based on the archival HST/NICMOS data from 1998, yielded a semi- major axis of a ∼ 68–74 AU and an inclination of i ∼ 13◦–23◦. Finally, Fig. 7 plots the difference of initial semimajor axes of HR8799 b and c, as well as HR8799 c and d, again depending on i and Ω. From all these figures, it is clearly seen that the or- bital spacing, and therefore the stability, might indeed strongly depend on the orientation of the system. This expectation is fully confirmed by the main bulk of numerical integrations that we performed with the aid of the MERCURY6 package (Chambers 1999). We used the hybrid symplectic/Bulirsch-Stoer integrator with an adaptive stepsize and a 10−14 angular momentum conservation accuracy, which changes to Bulirsch-Stoer algorithm at distances less than 3 Hill radii. Output has been stored every 1000 years. Each integra- tion terminated when two planets had a distance less than half the Hill radius or after an integration time of tmax = 100 Myr. In all cases we assumed a stellar mass of 1.5M⊙ and a distance of 39.4 pc to convert the separation angle into the projected as- Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 7 separation of HR8799b [AU] separation of HR8799b [AU] separation of HR8799b [AU] ∆a of HR8799b and HR8799c [AU] ∆a of HR8799b and HR8799c [AU] ] g e d [ l e g n a n o i t a n i l c n i ] g e d [ l e g n a n o i t a n i l c n i l ] g e d [ e g n a n o i t a n i l c n i 23o 23o 23o 13o 13o 13o 74AU 74AU 74AU 68AU 68AU 68AU 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 rotation angle [deg] separation of HR8799c [AU] 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 rotation angle [deg] separation of HR8799d [AU] 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 rotation angle [deg] Fig. 6. Initial semimajor axes of HR8799b (top), c (middle) and d (bottom) as a function of i and Ω. Solid horizontal lines in the uppermost panel border the range of inclination range of i = 13– 23◦ for HR8799 b, reported by Lafreni`ere et al. (2009). Dashed lines do the same for the semimajor axis range, a = 68–74 AU. trocentric distance. The three planets started at positions at the epoch of 2008 Sept. 18 (see Table 1 in Marois et al. 2008). We used 3 different sets of possible planet masses (see Table 4) and checked stability for i ∈ {0, 1, . . . , 45◦} and Ω ∈ {0, 5, . . . , 180◦}. Note that, although we assumed initially circular orbits, it does not mean that the orbits stay circular at later times. Just the oppo- site: the mutual perturbations always force eccentricities to take values in the range between zero and approximately 0.1, so that the initial circularity is "forgotten" by the system. The results of these integrations are presented in Fig. 8. It depicts the time interval until the first close encounter - as a proxy for stability - with an upper limit of 100 Myr. It is seen that all three planets may be stable for 100 Myr for either set of planetary masses, but only for some of all possible orienta- ] g e d [ l e g n a n o i t a n i l c n i ] g e d [ l e g n a n o i t a n i l c n i 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 rotation angle [deg] ∆a of HR8799c and HR8799d [AU] ∆a of HR8799c and HR8799d [AU] 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 rotation angle [deg] Fig. 7. Difference of initial semimajor axes ∆a between HR8799 b & c (top) and HR8799 c & d (bottom) as a function of i and Ω, as well as the location of the 2:1 commensurability of the periods for circular orbits. Table 4. Three sets of planet masses used in numerical integra- tions HR8799 low mass nominal mass high mass b 5MJup 7MJup 11MJup c 7MJup 10MJup 13MJup d 7MJup 10MJup 13MJup tions. Specifically, an inclination of >∼ 20◦ is required and the rotation angle Ω must lie within the range from ≈ 0◦ to ≈ 50◦. The higher the masses, the narrower the "stability spot" in the (i, Ω)-plane. Further, we conclude that it is the inner pair (c and d) that tends to destroy the stability. Indeed, comparing Fig. 8 to Fig. 7 one sees that the most stable regions are those where ∆a of HR8799 c and d is the largest, whereas that of HR8799 b and c is not. Finally, a comparison of Fig. 8 and Fig. 6 shows that the position of the "stability spot" in Fig. 8 roughly matches the in- clination of i = 13–23◦ and the semimajor axis of a = 68–74 AU of the outermost planet reported by Lafreni`ere et al. (2009). We now check whether all considered geometries are con- sistent with the measured differential proper motion of the com- panions. Fig. 9 depicts the projected differential proper mo- tions µ that the planets in circular orbits would have for each pair of i and Ω. Overplotted are the values of µ actually mea- sured together with their 1σ and 2σ deviations. For HR8799 c, we used µ = 30 ± 2 mas/yr from Marois et al. (2008). In con- trast, for HR8799 b we derived the differential proper motion of 22 ± 2 mas/yr by combining the Marois et al. measurements with Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 duration of stability in years duration of stability in years differential proper motion HR8799b (µ = 22 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799b (µ = 22 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799b (µ = 22 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799b (µ = 22 ± 2 mas/yr) 8 ] ] g g e e d d [ [ l l e e g g n n a a n n o o i i t t a a n n i i l l c c n n i i ] ] ] g g g e e e d d d [ [ [ l l l e e e g g g n n n a a a n n n o o o i i i t t t a a a n n n i i i l l l c c c n n n i i i l l l ] ] ] g g g e e e d d d [ [ [ e e e g g g n n n a a a n n n o o o i i i t t t a a a n n n i i i l l l c c c n n n i i i 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 45 45 45 40 40 40 35 35 35 30 30 30 25 25 25 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 10 10 5 5 5 0 0 0 45 45 45 40 40 40 35 35 35 30 30 30 25 25 25 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 10 10 5 5 5 0 0 0 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 0 0 20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 120 120 140 140 160 160 180 180 rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] duration of stability in years duration of stability in years duration of stability in years 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 0 0 0 20 20 20 40 40 40 60 60 60 80 80 80 100 100 100 120 120 120 140 140 140 160 160 160 180 180 180 rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] duration of stability in years duration of stability in years duration of stability in years 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 2:1 b-c 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 2:1 c-d 108 107 106 105 104 103 108 107 106 105 104 103 108 107 106 105 104 103 ] ] ] ] g g g g e e e e d d d d [ [ [ [ l l l l e e e e g g g g n n n n a a a a n n n n o o o o i i i i t t t t a a a a n n n n i i i i l l l l c c c c n n n n i i i i ] ] ] ] g g g g e e e e d d d d [ [ [ [ l l l l e e e e g g g g n n n n a a a a n n n n o o o o i i i i t t t t a a a a n n n n i i i i l l l l c c c c n n n n i i i i 2σ 2σ 2σ 2σ 1σ 1σ 1σ 1σ µ µ µ µ 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 100 120 120 120 120 140 140 140 140 160 160 160 160 180 180 180 180 rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] differential proper motion HR8799c (µ = 30 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799c (µ = 30 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799c (µ = 30 ± 2 mas/yr) differential proper motion HR8799c (µ = 30 ± 2 mas/yr) 2σ 2σ 2σ 2σ 1σ 1σ 1σ 1σ µ µ µ µ 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 35 35 35 35 30 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 15 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 35 35 35 35 30 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 15 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 80 80 80 80 100 100 100 100 120 120 120 120 140 140 140 140 160 160 160 160 180 180 180 180 rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] Fig. 9. Sky-projected differential proper motion that HR8799 b (top) and c (bottom) would have for each pair of i and Ω (as- suming circular orbits). The isolines are at µ, µ − σ, and µ − 2σ (σ = 2 mas/yr), where µ is the differential proper motion de- rived from the measurements, as described in the text. Note that the µ + σ and µ + 2σ curves for both companions fall outside the plots. A panel for HR8799 d is not included because the uncer- tainty (µ = 42 mas/yr ±27 mas/yr) is too large. To understand the stability region shown in Fig. 8, we check the possibility that it may be related to resonances. From Fig. 10 it is obvious that the two inner planets are close to the 2:1 res- onance. With still coplanar and circular orbits, we looked for combinations of i, Ω that would correspond to the 2:1 commen- surability. The resulting loci of the nominal 2:1 resonance in the (i,Ω)-plane (Fig. 8) just encircle the stability region. This strengthens the hypothesis that the stability may be directly re- lated to the 2:1 resonance. We then checked whether or not the orbits of HR8799 c and d within the stability region are indeed locked in the res- onance. To this end, we have calculated the resonant argument ϕcd = 2λc − λd − ωd, where λc and λd are the mean longitudes of HR8799 c and d and ωd is the argument of pericenter of the latter planet. We found that all stable orbits are indeed resonant. Interestingly, the initial values of λc and λd adopted in all nu- merical runs were such that the planets are not locked in the resonance initially, but - in all stable cases – the system swiftly "slips" into the resonance, which makes it safe. The resonant argument ϕcd librates around 0◦ with an amplitude (which we calculated as a standard deviation) of 22◦–100◦. For compari- son, the non-resonant case would have a standard deviation of ∼ 103.9◦. However, we made sure that even the cases with the li- bration amplitude up to 100◦ are resonanceces, albeit shallow. In these cases, the resonant argument circulates rather than librates. 0 0 0 20 20 20 40 40 40 60 60 60 80 80 80 100 100 100 120 120 120 140 140 140 160 160 160 180 180 180 rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] rotation angle [deg] Fig. 8. Duration of stability depending on i and Ω for different sets of planetary masses given in Tab. 4: top: low, middle: nom- inal, bottom: high. A grid of dots corresponds to the actual set of numerical runs (one dot = one run). Curves show where the periods between b-c and c-d would have a commensurability of 2:1 if the orbits were exactly circular. the 1998 data from Lafreni`ere et al. (2009). Note that further adding the 2002 positions from Fukagawa et al. (2009) does not change this result. For comparison, the differential proper mo- tion of HR8799 b given in Marois et al. (2008) is 25 ± 2 mas/yr. In the non-inclined case, the calculated differential proper mo- tion is always within 1σ of the measured one. For HR8799 b, all orbits with an inclination < 33◦ lie within 1σ of the mea- sured value. For HR8799 c, the same is true for i < 28◦. Nearly the whole parameter range of (i, Ω) explored here is compatible with observations within 2σ. It is easy to show that taking into account actual low eccentricities up to ≈ 0.1 acquired by the planets would not change this conclusion. Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 9 ] U A i [ s x a r o a m m e s j i 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 HR8799b HR8799c HR8799d 0 20 40 2:1 3:2 80 100 120 140 160 180 60 rotation angle [deg] Fig. 10. Semimajor axes of HR8799b, c and d (solid lines) and positions of external 2:1 (dashed) and 3:2 nominal resonances (dotted) of two inner planets as a function of Ω for i = 30◦. (i, Ω) = (25◦, 15◦) (i, Ω) = (29◦, 20◦) ] g e d [ t n e m u g r a t n a n o s e r 1 : 2 ] g e d [ t n e m u g r a t n a n o s e r 1 : 2 180 120 60 0 -60 -120 -180 180 120 60 0 -60 -120 -180 2λ b - λ c - ω c 0 20 40 60 time [Myr] 2λ c - λ d - ω d 80 100 0 20 40 60 time [Myr] 80 100 ] g e d [ t n e m u g r a t n a n o s e r 1 : 2 ] g e d [ t n e m u g r a t n a n o s e r 1 : 2 180 120 60 0 -60 -120 -180 180 120 60 0 -60 -120 -180 2λ b - λ c - ω c 0 20 40 60 time [Myr] 2λ c - λ d - ω d 80 100 0 20 40 60 time [Myr] 80 100 Fig. 11. Typical behavior of resonant arguments for the 2:1 mean motion resonance between HR8799 b & c (top) and HR8799 c & d (bottom). Nominal planetary masses are assumed. The libra- tion amplitude is 86◦ (left top), 36◦ (left bottom), 63◦ (right top), and 60◦ (right bottom). Thus the phase trajectories on the ec cos ϕcd–ec sin ϕcd plane are circles with an offset from (0,0), which is indicative of a resonant locking. For all stable configurations we then calculated the resonant argument for the two outer planets, HR8799 b and c, defined as ϕbc = 2λb − λc − ωc. We found that they are in a 2:1 res- onance, too, with the standard deviation in the range 36◦–97◦. Note that in all stable cases at least one of the resonances, c-d or b-d, is strong, as suggested by a low libration amplitude. Two typical examples of the time evolution of the resonant argument for both planetary pairs are shown in Fig. 11. Thus our results are consistent with those by Fabrycky & Murray-Clay (2008) and Go´zdziewski & Migaszewski (2009), who suggested a dou- ble resonance 4:2:1 as the likely "survival recipe" for the entire three-planet system. As noted above, the major danger of system's destabilization comes from the two inner planets which are likely more massive and more tightly spaced. Keeping this in mind and taking into account that data on the innermost companion (e.g. its differen- tial proper motion) are as yet the least reliable, we checked the dynamical stability properties the system would have without ] % [ s r o v v r u s f i o n o i t c a r f ] % [ s r o v v r u s f i o n o i t c a r f 100 80 60 40 20 0 80 100 80 60 40 20 0 10 low nominal 2 : 3 3 : 5 4 : 7 2 : 1 90 100 110 120 130 semimajor axis [AU] 3 : 1 5 : 2 7 : 3 2 : 1 low nominal 12 14 16 18 20 semimajor axis [AU] Fig. 13. Fraction of left-over planetesimals after 100 Myr of evolution in the outer (top) and inner (bottom) rings. Filled/hatched bars: nominal/low planetary mass. HR8799 d. We used the same setup for MERCURY6 and re- stricted our analysis to three cases: non-inclined configuration, i = 15◦, and i = 30◦. The overall result is that, as expected, the absence of the inner companion would drastically improve stability: – The non-inclined configuration becomes stable over a period of 100 Myr - not only for the nominal masses, but also for much higher masses up to Mb = 22MJup and Mc = 30MJup. The rapid breakdown of the system in less than 10 kyr would only be guaranteed with masses as high as Mb = 33MJup and Mc = 45MJup; – For i = 15◦ and all Ω = 0◦–180◦, the system with nominal masses is always stable over 100 Myr; – For i = 30◦, the system with nominal masses is unstable for Ω = 40◦–75◦ and stable otherwise. 5. Dynamical interaction between the planetesimal belts and the planets To check where the outer and inner planetesimal belts (main- taining dust rings d and b) would be truncated by planets, we have picked up one exemplary angle configuration from within the "stability spot" seen in Fig. 8. The point chosen is (i, Ω) = (30◦, 10◦), which implies initial semimajor axes of 74.7, 41.8 and 24.6 AU for HR8799 b, c and d, respectively. We launched 1000 massless planetesimals with uniformly distributed orbital elements (ep = 0–0.2, ip = 0–10◦, {ωp, Ωp, Mp} = 0–360◦). Of these, 200 planetesimals were ini- tially confined to a ring between ainner = 10–20 AU and the other 800 between aouter = 90 − 130 AU. We integrated their orbits over 100 Myr with an accuracy of 10−12 for low and nom- inal planetary masses, as given in Table 4. The high mass case was excluded, because the stability of companions themselves at (i, Ω) = (30◦, 10◦) was only marginal. Figure 12 shows that both the inner part of the outer ring and the outer part of the inner ring are swiftly cleared by the adjacent 10 Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 nominal mass (barycentric) low mass (barycentric) ] U A [ s x a i j r o a m m e s i 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 25 2:1 7:4 5:3 3:2 b 100 initial ring 0 20 40 60 80 time [Myr] nominal mass (astrocentric) ] U A [ s x a i j r o a m m e s i 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 initial ring 0 20 40 60 80 time [Myr] low mass (astrocentric) d 25 ] U A [ s x a i 20 initial ring ] U A [ s x a i 20 initial ring j r o a m m e s i 15 10 0 1:2 3:7 2:5 1:3 20 40 60 80 100 time [Myr] j r o a m m e s i 15 10 0 2:1 7:4 5:3 3:2 b 100 d 1:2 3:7 2:5 1:3 20 40 60 80 100 time [Myr] Fig. 12. Evolution of semimajor axes of planetesimals over 100 Myr of for the nominal (left) and low (right) planet masses. Starting planetesimal rings are shown with vertical bars. Solid and dashed lines represent the location of planets and important resonances, respectively. Note that the outer ring (top) is plotted in barycentric osculating elements and the inner ring in astrocentric ones. This choice leads to a sharper visibility of the resonance positions. planet (b and d, respectively). The belt of remaining planetesi- mals develops "Kirkwood gaps" at the positions of major reso- nances. Over tens of Myr, the gaps get progressively more pro- nounced. Simultaneously, the fraction of particles surviving be- tween them gradually decreases. As expected, the survival prob- ability of planetesimals at a given distance is larger for lower masses of the companions. For both rings and for the nominal- and low-mass cases, Fig. 13 presents the fraction of planetesimals that survived af- ter 100 Myr in orbits with different initial semimajor axes. For nominal planetary masses, the outer ring shows a considerable depletion, with only ∼ 10 to 20% planetesimals surviving even outside 120 AU. There are almost no survivors inside the 5:3 and 7:4 resonances with HR8799 b at ≈ 105–110 AU. In the low- mass case the survival fraction in the outer ring is appreciably higher (15–70% between ≈ 110–130 AU). The inner ring retains 80–100% of planetesimals inside 11 AU. The outer edge of the ring is at 13 AU (nominal-mass planet) to 15 AU (low-mass one). These results have to be compared with dust locations found from the SED fitting in section 3.2. As noted there, the far- infrared to millimeter part of the SED requires dust in the outer ring as close as 120 AU from the star; we have just shown that a significant fraction of planetesimals survives outside 120 AU after 100 Myr, at least in the low-mass case. In the nominal-mass case, the fraction of survivors is lower, but any firm conclusions appear premature, since the location of the outer ring is in fact not well-constrained (see section 3.2.). Next, the IRS spectrum interpretation requires dust in the inner ring at least at 10 AU away from the star. This is comfortably within the stability zone inside the orbit of HR8799 d for both the nominal-mass and low- mass cases. Moreover, 10 AU quoted above is the distance where dust is required; as discussed in section 3.2, the parent planetes- imals would orbit closer to the star, being yet safer against the perturbations of the innermost planet than their dust. In sum- mary, our analysis of the outer system might slightly favor the low-mass case, but would not really pose any additional strong constraints to the planetary masses. 6. Conclusions and discussion 6.1. Conclusions In this paper, we made an attempt of a coherent analysis of var- ious portions of observational data currently available for the system of a nearby A5 star HR8799, which hosts debris dust as well as three planetary candidates recently discovered via di- rect imaging (Marois et al. 2008). A dedicated analysis of all known components of the system (the central star, imaged com- panions, and dust) leads us to a view of a complex circumstel- lar system (Fig. 14). It contains at least three planets in nearly- circular coplanar orbits bordered by two dust-producing plan- etesimal belts, one outside the planetary region and another in- side it. Each planetesimal belt is encompassed by a dust disk. The outer dust disk may have a considable extention, perhaps several hundreds of AU. Our specific conclusions are as follows: 1. With previous estimates of stellar age ranging from ≈ 20 to ≈ 1100 Myr, high luminosity of observed cold dust may favor younger ages of <∼ 50 Myr. A younger age would au- tomatically lower the masses for all three companions, es- timated through evolutionary models, making the masses Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 11 6. Both dust/planetesimal belts appear to be dynamically stable against planetary perturbations, provided the masses of com- panions are such that they themselves are dynamically stable against mutual perturbations. 6.2. Prospectsforfutureobservations Given the paucity of observational data available to date, many of the quantitative estimates listed above are quite uncertain and should be taken with caution. However, there is little doubt that new observations will arrive soon, verifying these estimates and on any account reducing the uncertainties. Firstly, new observations of the planets themselves are ex- pected and would be of great value. Better astrometry, and there- fore a better determination of the orbits should become pos- sible with improving instruments and methods of astrometric observations, and because of the longer time spans. Next, new photometry observations are needed. The companions are de- tected so far in JHK and L′. The SED is relatively flat in this wavelength range for objects with temperature of roughly 500 to 1500 K. Imaging photometric detections of the companions in either Gunn z (1 µm) or M (5 µm) must be possible with 8 to 10m class telescopes. They would allow one to constrain the objects' temperature, because the colors z-J and L-M and their differences depend on temperature strongly over the rele- vant range of 500 to 1500 K. Further, spatially resolved spec- troscopy of the companions may be possible with VLT/Sinfoni or Subaru/IRSC, but would be very challenging. If successful, it would place tighter constraints on temperature and gravity and, hence, radius and mass of the companions. Secondly, new data on the dust portion of the system would be particularly promising. For instance, a better mid-infrared photometry would result in more reliable dust mass and loca- tion of the inner dust belt ("exozodi"). One could also think of near- and mid-IR interferometry observations, which have proven very successful not only for exozodi studies, but also for stellar radius determination (see, e.g., Di Folco et al. 2004; Absil et al. 2006; Di Folco et al. 2007; Absil et al. 2008). While HR8799 is too faint to be observed with the presently oper- ating CHARA/FLUOR and Keck Interferometry Nuller instru- ments (e.g. for CHARA the K-magnitude of <∼ 4 mag is needed, whereas HR8799 has K = 5.2 mag), this should become possi- ble in the near future, for instance with VLTI/PIONIER and the LBTI Nuller. More observational effort is required for the outer disk as well. Resolving the outer debris disk, especially in scat- tered light, would answer several key questions at a time. On the one hand, it would further constrain the inclination of the entire system and the orientation of its line of nodes on the sky plane, drastically reducing the parameter space assumed in the dynam- ical simulations. On the other hand, the precise location of the inner rim of the disk could place a direct upper limit on the mass of HR8799 b, much in the same way it was recently done for the Fomalhaut planet (Kalas et al. 2008; Chiang et al. 2009). Since a high dustiness of the debris disk of HR8799 makes it a relatively easy target, whereas advantages of resolving it are obvious, suc- cess can be expected in the near future4. Once the location and masses of the dust belts are better con- strained from observations, it will become possible to access the position, masses, and other properties of directly invisible plan- 4 After submission of this paper, we became aware of recent suc- cessful observations: the outer disk of HR8799 was resolved at 24 and 70 µm with Spitzer/MIPS (Kate Su, pers. comm). The data analysis in ongoing. b c d inner ring of planetesimals and dust outer ring of planetesimals outer dust disk 100AU Fig. 14. A schematic view of the system HR8799. more consistent with dynamical stability results (see conclu- sion 5). 2. The system is seen nearly pole-on. Our analysis of the stel- lar rotational velocity suggests an inclination of 13 – 30◦, whereas i >∼ 20◦ seems to be mandatory for the system to be dynamically stable (see conclusion 5). Thus we arrive at a probable inclination range of 20 – 30◦. 3. Our analysis of the available mid-infrared to millimeter pho- tometry and spectrophotometry data reveals the presence of two dust rings, and therefore two parent planetesimal belts, an "asteroid belt" at ∼ 10 AU and a "Kuiper belt" at >∼ 100 AU. The dust masses are estimated to be ≈ 1×10−5 M⊕ and 4 × 10−2 M⊕ for the inner and outer ring, respectively. 4. Assuming that the system is indeed rather young (<∼ 50 Myr) and based on the photometry of the companions reported by Marois et al. (2008), our estimates with several evolutionary models suggest the masses of the companions to be lower than 7 to 10MJup. 5. We show that all three planets may be stable in the mass range suggested in the discovery paper by Marois et al. 2008 (between 5 and 13MJup), but only for some of all possible orientations. For (Mb, Mc, Md) = (5, 7, 7)MJup, an inclina- tion i >∼ 20◦ is required and the line of nodes of the sys- tem's symmetry plane on the sky must lie within 0◦ to 50◦ from north eastward. For higher masses (Mb, Mc, Md) from (7, 10, 10)MJup to (11, 13, 13)MJup, the constraints on both angles are even more stringent. The stability of the two inner planets is due to locking in the 2:1 mean-motion resonance, and the stability of the outer couple is supported by the 2:1 commensurability, too. However, in many stable cases only one of the two resonances is strong. Another one is often shallow, with a circulating rather than librating resonant ar- gument. For "wrong" orientations, the stability only seems possible with planetary masses lower than most evolution- ary models would predict even for the youngest possible age (cf. Table 3). Should this be the case, this would necessitate revisions to the models. 12 Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 etesimal belts that produce and sustain that dust. This could be done with the help of elaborate collisional models (Krivov et al. 2008). The results could provide additional clues to the forma- tion history of the system. 6.3. Originandstatusofthesystem The HR8799 system is among a few systems known to date to possess more than one planet and at least one planetesi- mal/dust belt. Other examples are HD38529 (Moro-Martin et al. 2007) and HD69830 (Beichman et al. 2005; Lisse et al. 2007). Further, it is not the only system with directly imaged compan- ions whose masses most likely fall into the "planetary" (as op- posed to brown dwarf) range. However, in some sense HR8799 does appear unique for the moment. The orbits of companions extending up to ≈ 70 AU are large, and their masses most likely too – probably almost at the limit of their dynamical stability against mutual perturbations. Even though we strongly argue that the masses are well below the deuterium burning limit, it is not clear whether the companions have formed in a "plan- etary" way (from the protoplanetary disk) or "stellar" way (as a multiple stellar system). In this sense, it remains questionable whether we are dealing with "true" planets. An argument in favor of the "stellar" formation would be, for instance, a low metal- licity (Fe/H ≈ −0.47, Gray & Kaye 1999), atypical of - al- though not the lowest among - the known planet host stars. The low metallicity is particularly unusual for a system with several high-mass planets. "Planetary" way of formation in situ could be feasible through the gravitational instability (GI) (Cameron 1978; Boss 1998). For GI to work, the density of the protoplan- etary disk should excess the Toomre density (Toomre 1964). At the same time, it should be low enough to allow efficient cool- ing, which is required for a disk to fragment into bound clumps (Gammie 2001). Both radiative and convective cooling rates may not be efficient enough for direct formation of giant planets by GI within several tens of AU from the parent star (Rafikov 2005, 2007). As far as the standard core accretion scenario is con- cerned, the only possibility to explain the formation of planets with several Jupiter masses would be to admit that they have formed closer to the star and then were scattered gravitation- ally to wider orbits (e.g. Veras & Armitage 2004). Nevertheless, it is difficult to find a mechanism that has circularized their or- bits subsequently. Alternatively, massive planets formed by core accretion could have smoothly migrated from their birth places outward. However, this would require displacing a comparable – and therefore an unrealistically large – mass of planetesimals inward over large distances, rendering this mechanism problem- atic. Thus, by and large it remains unclear how the planets have formed. The era of directly imaged extrasolar planets that has just begun must eventually bring answers to these and many other questions. Acknowledgements. We thank the referee, Daniel Fabrycky, for an insightful and very useful review, which greatly helped to improve the paper. AK and RN acknowledge discussions with Cesary Migaszewski on the dynamics of planets. SF and SM are funded by the graduate student fellowships of the Thuringia State. TOBS acknowledges support from Evangelisches Studienwerk e.V. Villigst. Part of this work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft, DFG project numbers Kr 2164/5-1, Kr 2164/8-1, Ne 515/13-1, Ne 515/13-2, and Ne 515/23-1, by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD), project D/0707543, and by the International Space Science Institute in Bern, Switzerland ("Exozodiacal Dust Disks and Darwin" working group, http://www.issibern.ch/teams/exodust/). References Absil, O., di Folco, E., M´erand, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 452, 237 Absil, O., di Folco, E., M´erand, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 487, 1041 Allende Prieto, C. & Lambert, D. L. 1999, A&A, 352, 555 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2008, A&A, 482, 315 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. S., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2003, A&A, 402, 701 Beichman, C. A., Bryden, G., Gautier, T. N., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 1061 Beichman, C. A., Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., Clegg, P. E., & Chester, T. J., eds. 1988, Infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) catalogs and atlases. Volume 1: Explanatory supplement, Vol. 1 Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923 Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 Cameron, A. G. W. 1978, Moon and Planets, 18, 5 Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. 2000, ApJ, 542, 464 Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2005 [arXiv:astro- ph/0509798] Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793 Chen, C. H., Sargent, B. A., Bohac, C., & et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 351 Chiang, E., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2009, ApJ, 693, 734 Close, L. M. & Males, J. R. 2009, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:0904.3936] Cohen, M., Wheaton, W. A., & Megeath, S. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1090 Di Folco, E., Absil, O., Augereau, J.-C., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 243 Di Folco, E., Th´evenin, F., Kervella, P., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 601 Fabrycky, D. C. & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2008, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:0812.0011] Fabrycky, D. C. & Winn, J. N. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1230 Fukagawa, M., Itoh, Y., Tamura, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, L1 Gammie, C. F. 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Go´zdziewski, K. & Migaszewski, C. 2009, MNRAS, in press Gray, R. O. & Kaye, A. B. 1999, AJ, 118, 2993 Hauschildt, P., Allard, F., & Baron, E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 377 Helou, G. & Walker, D. W., eds. 1988, Infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) catalogs and atlases. Volume 7: The small scale structure catalog, Vol. 7 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27 Jura, M., Chen, C. H., Furlan, E., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 453 Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1345 Kaye, A. B. & Strassmeier, K. G. 1998, MNRAS, 294, L35 Krivov, A. V., Lohne, T., & Sremcevi´c, M. 2006, A&A, 455, 509 Krivov, A. V., Muller, S. amd Lohne, T., & Mutschke, H. 2008, ApJ, 687, 608 Lafreni`ere, D., Marois, C., Doyon, R., & Barman, T. 2009, ApJ, 694, L148 Laor, A. & Draine, B. T. 1993, ApJ, 402, 441 Lasker, B. M., Lattanzi, M. G., McLean, B. J., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 735 Le Bouquin, J.-B., Absil, O., Benisty, M., et al. 2009, A&A, in press [arXiv:0904.1688] Lisse, C. M., Beichman, C. A., Bryden, G., & Wyatt, M. C. 2007, ApJ, 658, 584 Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541 Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1348 Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 984 Mo´or, A., ´Abrah´am, P., Derekas, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 525 Moro-Mart´ın, A., Malhotra, R., Carpenter, J. M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 1165 Moshir, M., Kopan, G., Conrow, T., & 9 colleagues. 1990, IRAS Faint Source Catalogue, version 2.0. Pasinetti Fracassini, L. E., Pastori, L., Covino, S., & Pozzi, A. 2001, A&A, 367, 521 Paunzen, E. 2001, A&A, 373, 633 Perryman, M. A. C. & ESA, eds. 1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol. 1200, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission Rafikov, R. R. 2005, ApJ, 621, L69 Rafikov, R. R. 2007, ApJ, 662, 642 Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B., & McElwain, M. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1556 Rodriguez, E. & Zerbi, F. M. 1995, Inf. Bul. Var. Stars, 4170, 1 Royer, F., Zorec, J., & G´omez, A. E. 2007, A&A, 463, 671 Sadakane, K. 2006, PASJ, 58, 1023 Sadakane, K. & Nishida, M. 1986, PASP, 98, 685 Schmidt, T. O. B., Neuhauser, R., & Seifahrt, A. 2009 [arXiv:0905.0439] Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163 Song, I., Caillault, J.-P., Barrado y Navascu´es, D., & Stauffer, J. R. 2001, ApJ, 546, 352 Stevenson, D. J. 1982, Planet. Space Sci., 30, 755 Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Misselt, K. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 487 Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Stansberry, J. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 675 Sylvester, R. J., Skinner, C. J., Barlow, M. J., & Mannings, V. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 915 Th´ebault, P. & Augereau, J.-C. 2007, A&A, 472, 169 Reidemeister et al.: The planetary system HR 8799 13 Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Turcotte, S. 2002, ApJ, 573, L129 Uesugi, A. & Fukuda, I. 1982, Catalogue of stellar rotational velocities (revised) (Kyoto: University of Kyoto, Departement of Astronomy, 1982, Rev.ed.) Veras, D. & Armitage, P. J. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 613 Williams, J. P. & Andrews, S. M. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1480 Wuchterl, G. 2001, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 200, The Formation of Binary Stars, ed. H. Zinnecker & R. Mathieu, 492 Zacharias, N., Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., et al. 2004, in Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., Vol. 36, 1418 Zerbi, F. M., Rodr´ıguez, E., Garrido, R., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 275 Zuckerman, B. & Song, I. 2004, ApJ, 603, 738
1805.07842	1	1805	2018-05-20T23:41:21	Physics of Meteor Generated Shock Waves in the Earth's Atmosphere - A Review	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Shock waves and the associated phenomena generated by strongly ablating meteoroids with sizes greater than a few millimeters in the lower transitional flow regime of the Earth's atmosphere are the least explored aspect of meteor science. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of literature covering meteor generated shock wave phenomena, from the aspect of both meteor science and hypersonic gas dynamics. The primary emphasis of this review is placed on the mechanisms and dynamics of the meteor shock waves. We discuss key aspects of both shock generation and propagation, including the great importance of the hydrodynamic shielding that develops around the meteoroid. In addition to this in-depth review, the discussion is extended to an overview of meteoroid fragmentation, followed by airburst type events associated with large, deep penetrating meteoroids. This class of objects has a significant potential to cause extensive material damage and even human casualties on the ground, and as such is of great interest to the planetary defense community. To date, no comprehensive model exists that accurately describes the flow field and shock wave formation of a strongly ablating meteoroid in the non-continuum flow regime. Thus, we briefly present the current state of numerical models that describe the comparatively slower flow of air over non-ablating bodies in the rarefied regime. In respect to the elusive nature of meteor generated shock wave detection, we also discuss relevant aspects and applications of meteor radar and infrasound studies as tools that can be utilized to study meteor shock waves and related phenomena.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Physics of Meteor Generated Shock Waves in the Earth's Atmosphere – A Review Elizabeth A. Silber1, Mark Boslough2, Wayne K. Hocking3, Maria Gritsevich4,5,6, Rodney W. Whitaker7 1Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA; 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada; 4Department of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; 5Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia; 6Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; 7Los Alamos National Laboratory, EES-17 MS F665, PO Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.010 Abstract Shock waves and the associated phenomena generated by strongly ablating meteoroids with sizes greater than a few millimeters in the lower transitional flow regime of the Earth's atmosphere are the least explored aspect of meteor science. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of literature covering meteor generated shock wave phenomena, from the aspect of both meteor science and hypersonic gas dynamics. The primary emphasis of this review is placed on the mechanisms and dynamics of the meteor shock waves. We discuss key aspects of both shock generation and propagation, including the great importance of the hydrodynamic shielding that develops around the meteoroid. In addition to this in-depth review, the discussion is extended to an overview of meteoroid fragmentation, followed by airburst type events associated with large, deep penetrating meteoroids. This class of objects has a significant potential to cause extensive material damage and even human casualties on the ground, and as such is of great interest to the planetary defense community. To date, no comprehensive model exists that accurately describes the flow field and shock wave formation of a strongly ablating meteoroid in the non-continuum flow regime. Thus, we briefly present the current state of numerical models that describe the comparatively slower flow of air over non-ablating bodies in the rarefied regime. In respect to the elusive nature of meteor generated shock wave detection, we also discuss relevant aspects and applications of meteor radar and infrasound studies as tools that can be utilized to study meteor shock waves and related phenomena. In particular, infrasound data can provide energy release estimates of meteoroids entering the Earth's atmosphere. We conclude with a summary of unresolved questions in the domain of meteor generated shock waves; topics which should be a focus of future investigations in the field. Keywords: meteor, shock wave, meteoroid, cylindrical shock wave, shock physics Corresponding Author: Elizabeth A. Silber, Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, 324 Brook St., Box 1946, Providence, RI, 02912, USA, E-mail: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction According to the definition by Thomas Kuhn (Beech, 1988), meteor science has reached maturity, yet by some other arguments may be a science in decline (Gilbert, 1977). However, these remarks do not necessarily apply to all sub-disciplines of meteor science. There are still a number of major questions that remain unanswered, especially in regard to nonlinear and short time energetic processes that take place during the meteoroid ablation, such as shock waves. Historical examples of extraterrestrial impacts, such as the Tunguska (e.g., Chyba et al., 1993) and the more recent Chelyabinsk (Brown et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013) events, serve as a reminder of the destructive potential of shock waves generated by large meteoroids, and the importance of studies of shock wave phenomena. Detailed studies in the field of meteor physics that consider theoretical, observational and computational studies of the dynamics and effects of meteor shock waves are relatively sparse. That is not to say that there is a lack of understanding of rarefied gas dynamics and hypersonic flow (Brun, 2009; Anderson, 2006; Cercignani, 2000); rather, that area of research has been, and still is, confined and maintained within the domain of specialized applications of re-entry studies (Sarma, 2000), there being little or no cross disciplinary work with investigators in the meteor field. Thus, the main motive behind this review is to consolidate and bring the state of the field up to date and to facilitate further understanding of and inquiry into those unresolved questions in meteor science, in particular about meteor generated shock waves and related phenomena which in extreme and rare cases can present considerable danger to civilian lives and infrastructure (e.g., Brown et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013; Pelton et al., 2015; Kulagin et al., 2016; Tapia et al., 2017). We present a long needed condensed survey of the available (and sparse) literature covering fundamental and up-to-date aspects of meteor related shock wave phenomena and attempt to balance it with a review of the related interdisciplinary work from hypersonic gas dynamics (and other related disciplines). The primary emphasis of this review is placed on the cylindrical shock waves generated by meteoroids with diameters greater than four millimeters and up to large fireballs. Additionally, the dynamics and hazards associated with large deep penetrating meteoroids (e.g., Boslough et al., 1995; Silber et al., 2009; Brown et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013) are also presented in some depth. This review paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents a general overview of meteoroid entry in the atmosphere; Section 3 describes the Knudsen number and flow regimes of meteoroids; Section 4 presents a detailed overview of hydrodynamic shielding and implications to the formation of shock waves; Section 5 describes transition from hydrodynamic shielding to shock wave; and Section 6 provides a detailed breakdown and "anatomy" of meteor generated shock waves. While the review of meteor generated shock waves technically concludes with Section 6, we add three additional sections to provide the reader with further insight into applications and implications of the meteor generated shock waves. These sections include analytical and numerical approaches (Section 7), meteoroid fragmentation (Section 8), airbursts and NEO threat (Section 9), and radar and infrasound observations of meteor generated shock waves (Section 10). We conclude this review paper with Section 11, where we present some remaining unresolved problems in the field of meteor shock wave physics. 2. Meteoroids in the Atmosphere The scientific inquiry into the nature of meteor phenomena can be traced to the 19th century (Hughes, 1982), although meteor science experienced a renaissance period after the Second World War, following the rapid advancements in radar and spectroscopic techniques. Moreover, with the advent of the space-race, early studies were also motivated by problems of ascending and re-entry vehicles, and protection of space assets (DeVincenzi et al., 1998; Ben-Dor et al., 2000). In general, the study of meteor phenomena is of great importance beyond narrow sub-disciplinary studies. The interplanetary and interstellar particles may have 2 brought chemicals necessary for seeding life on Earth (Plane, 2012). Meteoroids are also considered to be a source of the metallic layer in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) above 80 km and play an important role in the chemistry of the upper atmosphere (Ceplecha et al., 1998; Plane, 2012; Plane et al., 2015). However, it is interesting to note that, while meteor science has branched into many sub disciplines, such as the study of upper atmospheric density, temperature, scale height (e.g., Manning et al., 1959; Tsutsumi et al., 1994; Marsh et al., 2001), diffusion coefficients, wind velocity and turbulence (e.g., Hocking et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2003; Hocking et al., 2016a, 2016b), meteor generated shock waves have received the least attention in the literature. Before we engage in a discussion about the shock waves, we shall briefly revisit the fundamentals of the physics of meteor phenomena. Some estimates suggest that around 105 tons/year of interplanetary and space dust and particles (collectively called meteoroids) of mainly chondritic origin (Plane, 2012) impact the Earth's atmosphere with a peak in the size (diameter) and mass distribution of around 2·10-4 m and 10 μg, respectively (Kalashnikova et al., 2000; Plane, 2012). While the combined number of particles entering the Earth's atmosphere daily is about 108 (Barri, 2010a) (or about 300 tons), only a small fraction of that number corresponds to cm sized and larger meteoroids (Moorhead et al., 2017). The total mass influx has been slightly revised recently; however, there are still large uncertainties in those estimates (Drolshagen et al., 2017; Moorhead et al., 2017). Entry (pre-atmospheric) particle velocities range from 11.2 km/s to 72.5 km/s (Baggaley, 1980; Baggaley, 2002) with mean values between 25 - 30 km/s determined through radar observations (Janches et al., 2006) and 20.6 km/s for Near-Earth Objects (NEO) estimated through modeling (Greenstreet et al., 2012). Upon entering the upper Earth atmosphere, a meteoroid experiences an initial mass loss by sputtering (Hill et al., 2004; Rogers et al., 2005; Vinković, 2007) as a result of high energy collisions with a rarefied atmospheric gas molecules. At lower altitudes, the meteoroid encounters the exponentially increasing atmospheric density and undergoes rapid heating and subsequent differential ablation (Vondrak et al., 2008). However, ablation takes place only if the particle can reach sufficiently high temperatures (Plane, 2012). As micrometeoroids are susceptible to rapid heat loss by thermal radiation (Popova et al., 2001), fusion temperatures are reached by meteoroids with masses exceeding 10-7 g and a diameter greater than ~ 10-6 m (Plane, 2012). Besides fragmentation, additional factors such as material properties and particle velocity play a critical role in onset, efficiency and type of ablation (Bronshten, 1983; Campbell-Brown et al., 2004; Popova, 2005). Particles in the size range 0.1 – 10 cm ablate in the region of the atmosphere between approximately 70 and 100 km altitude. Larger meteoroids (including meter-sized ones) penetrate much deeper in the lower atmosphere where they deposit most of their energy (e.g., Popova, 2005; Gritsevich, 2008; Gritsevich et al., 2017). In principle, the ablation plays an essential role for the meteoroids in the range of roughly 10-6–100 m in diameter (Popova, 2005). For an ablating meteoroid, the energy required to completely vaporize the particle is several orders of magnitude smaller than the initial kinetic energy imparted by collisions with the atmospheric molecules (Romig, 1965; Zinn et al., 2004). A review of ablation and ablation models is given by Popova (2005). While ablation models (Campbell-Brown and Koschny, 2004) are capable of reasonably reproducing the ablation of faint meteoroids in the size range of 1·10-4 to 2·10-3 m, a more recent study (Campbell-Brown et al., 2013) discusses the shortcomings of numerical approaches to meteoroid ablation and demonstrates the need for significant improvement in meteoroid ablation models. In the context of differential ablation, it is important to note that early results of the experimental heating of meteoric material (Notsu et al., 1978) and the thermodynamic modeling of vaporization of chondritic magma (Fegley et al., 1987) supported the hypothesis of differential ablation, as it was indicated that the meteoric elements are released into the ambient atmosphere according to their differing volatilities. More recent models of differential ablation were successful in resolving the nature of the distinct metallic layer in the MLT (e.g., McNeil et al., 1998; Vondrak et al., 2008; Plane, 2004, 2012; Feng et al., 2013; Marsh et al., 2013; Dawkins et al., 2015; Plane et al., 2015; Bones et al., 2016). However, 3 if models of differential ablation are based on oversimplified assumptions, then the potential uncertainties may arise if such models neglect the fact that a significant amount of volatile species might be bound in more thermodynamically stable oxide phases. The optically detectable luminous phenomenon (applicable to sufficiently large particles), resulting from de-excitation of ablated and collisionally excited molecules and atoms, is called a meteor. In principle, the radiative stage of the meteor evolution is a result of ablated and ionized plasma radiative energy loss that takes place during the collisional deceleration. The ablated meteoric atoms and ions, and the initially entrained and modified atmospheric gas decelerate to the ambient kinetic velocities within several hundred meters (Jenniskens et al., 2004a). If a fragment survives the passage through the atmosphere and lands on the ground, it is called a meteorite. We will not discuss these objects further. Several different mechanisms are involved in the meteoroid ablative mass loss; the prevalence of specific ablation mechanisms is a function of meteoroid mass, velocity, composition and altitude (Bronshten, 1983). High energy collisions with the local atmosphere involve the exchange of translational, rotational, and vibrational energy and lead to excitation, dissociation and ionization of both incident atmospheric molecules and ejected meteoric atoms (Bauer, 1990; Dressler et al., 2001; Zinn et al., 2004; Panesi et al., 2011). Depending on the meteoroid velocity, the kinetic energies imparted collisionally to ablated meteor atoms may exceed several hundred electron volts (eV), while the initial kinetic energy of any free electrons may approach 10 eV (Baggaley, 1980; Hocking et al., 2016b). Those high energy collisions that lead to the potential formation of new species are generally referred to as reactive collisions (for a detailed discussion about reactive flows see Brun, 2009). The density of ablated meteoric atoms and molecules is much greater than the density of the incident local atmosphere. The simple picture is that the high temperature ablated meteoric atoms (which are ionized by collisions or by radiative emissions) initially expand adiabatically in the meteor wake and form a cylindrical volume of ionized plasma with some explosively formed initial radius r0 (Jones, 1995; Jones et al., 2005; Hocking et al., 2016b). We consider the meteor wake to simply be the region immediately aft of the meteoroid. It is also the region that approximately corresponds to the meteor radiative stage (or the stage when ablated vapor is moving and it has not been slowed down to ambient gas velocities) (McCrosky, 1958; Bronshten, 1983). Upon reaching the initial radius (Jones, 1995), this dynamically stable volume of plasma vapor is in pressure (but not in temperature) equilibrium with the local atmosphere and is typically several kilometers long (e.g., see Lees et al., 1961, 1962; Jones, 1995; Jones and Campbell-Brown, 2005; Hocking et al., 2016b). This is a generally reasonable interpretation for the formation of the trail with some initial radius of ablating micrometeoroids. However, for a category of larger meteoroids (dm ≥ 4 mm), the formation of shock waves (resulting in heating of ambient atmosphere) and higher residual temperatures in the meteor wake need to be considered during the initial stage of meteor trail postadiabatic expansion (Hocking et al., 2016b). Higher temperatures in the initial meteor train may be due to the phenomena of "frozen" and non- equilibrium flows of high energy ablated meteoric ions and atoms (to be discussed later) mixed with energized dissociated (and ionized) atmospheric constituents that were swept behind the flow field. This means that the postadiabatic train may not be in initial thermal equilibrium with the atmosphere at the time of its formation (Jenniskens et al., 2004a; Zinn et al., 2005). Indeed, this may indicate that the initial radial expansion of plasma (following the adiabatic trail formation) exceeds the rate of ambipolar diffusion (see Hocking et al., 2016b). During the trail formation, the radial expansion of ablated high temperature material may also be complicated by the effect of local turbulent diffusion, driven by the flow field velocity, temperature and density gradients (Lees and Hromas, 1961, 1962; Silber et al., 2017a). The degree of ionization in the meteor train depends on the so called ionization coefficient (McKinley, 1961; Jones, 1997; Jones et al., 2001; Weryk 4 et al., 2013). The ionized meteor train, as an artifact of meteor passage through the atmosphere, can be either observed visually or detected by radar (Hocking et al., 2001; 2016b), as the quasineutral plasma expands into the ambient atmosphere under height dependent ambipolar diffusion (Francey, 1963; Holway, 1965; Galligan et al., 2004; Oppenheim et al., 2015). Some aspects of the short lasting hyperthermal chemistry which take place on the boundaries of high temperature cylindrical meteor trains in the initial stages of postadiabatic expansion have been studied by Silber et al. (2017a). Thermally driven chemical processes within the meteor wake and high temperature trains were discussed by Berezhnoy et al. (2010) and in earlier work by Menees et al. (1976) and Park et al. (1978). Contrary to still unresolved questions about thermally driven chemical reactions and uncertainty in thermalization times of the meteor train reported in the study of Jenniskens et al. (2004a), the aspects of thermalized meteor train chemistry are well understood (e.g., Baggaley, 1978, 1979; Plane, 2003, 2012; Whalley et al., 2011; Plane et al., 2015). Further comprehensive reviews and discussions of the meteoroid ablation process can be found in Bronshten (1983), Ceplecha et al. (1998), Plane (2012) and computational work by Boyd (2000), Popova et al. (2001), Zinn et al. (2004) and Zinn and Drummond (2005). Similarly, a review of meteoroid ablation models is given by Popova (2005). The classical energy balance equation for a spherical meteoroid under the assumption of an isotropic energy flux can be expressed as: 1 2 𝜋𝑟𝑚 2Λ𝜌𝑎𝑣3 = 4𝜋𝑟𝑚 2𝜀𝜎𝑆𝐵(𝑇𝑠 4 − 𝑇0 4) + 𝑄 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 + 4 3 𝜋𝑟𝑚 3𝜌𝑚𝐶 𝑑𝑇𝑚 𝑑𝑡 (1). Here, rm is the meteoroid radius, Λ is the dimensionless heat transfer coefficient, which is a measure of efficiency of the collision process in converting kinetic energy into heat (McKinley, 1961), and Q is the latent heat of vaporization. The specific heat and density of the meteoroid along with density of air and meteoroid velocity are denoted by C, ρm, ρa and v, respectively. The Stefan-Boltzmann constant is classically defined by σSB, and ε is the emissivity of the meteoroid. Ts, T0, Tm, are the temperature of the meteoroid surface, temperature of the ambient air and some mean temperature of the meteoroid at some small time interval, respectively (e.g., see Popova, 2005; Plane, 2012). The terms on the left hand side (LHS) describe the energy input per area by colliding air molecules. On the right hand side (RHS), the first term is the radiative loss and the second term describes the heat consumed in the transfer of particle mass into the gas phase (or vaporization). The last term on the right represents the energy losses due to heat conduction (i.e., phase transitions and heating). For the purpose of completeness, let us list the rest of the basic equations that govern meteoroid motion in the atmosphere. We will limit the exposition to single body ablation and discrete, gross fragmentation (Ceplecha et al., 1998). Consider a meteoroid with mass (m), radius (rm), density (ρm) and projected cross-sectional area (S), moving at velocity (v) and having a drag coefficient (CD). The meteoroid then sweeps through a volume of air in a time increment (dt), transferring kinetic energy to the atmosphere. Now we can introduce the dimensionless shape factor (As), which relates the mid-sectional area of the meteoroid to its volume (Vm) through: 𝐴𝑠 = 𝑆 2/3. Then, in general, the cross-sectional area can be expressed 𝑉𝑚 in terms of the meteoroid density and meteoroid mass: 𝑆 = 𝐴𝑠 ( 𝑚 𝜌𝑚 2/3 ) (2). The value of As will depend on the shape of the meteoroid. For example, for the sphere, As = 1.21; for a hemisphere, As = 1.92; and for a cube moving face on to the flow, As = 1 (McKinley, 1961). However, since meteoroids tumble during their flight through the atmosphere, it is generally assumed that irregularly shaped bodies will have their shape factor approach that of a sphere. In cases where a more detailed knowledge of the meteoroid shape as a function of rotation rate (Levin, 1956) is needed, the light curve analysis from 5 optical observations can be used to better constrain this information (e.g., Gritsevich et al., 2011; Bouquet et al., 2014 and references therein). As the meteoroid propagates through the atmosphere, it sweeps out a volume of air of size Svdt in time dt The mass of the volume can be represented in terms of the atmospheric density (ρa) as dma = ρaSvdt. Substituting for S from Eq. (2), one can arrive to the expression for the rate of changing air mass (ma) in unit time encountered by the meteoroid (McKinley, 1961) as: 𝑑𝑚𝑎 = 𝜌𝑎 ( 𝑚 𝜌𝑚 2/3 ) 𝐴𝑠 𝑣𝑑𝑡 (3). As a result of impacts with the meteoroid, this parcel of air with a height-specific mass density will transfer momentum to the meteoroid. This in turn results in a rate of change of momentum of the meteoroid: 𝑑(𝑚𝑣) 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑣 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 + 𝑚 𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑡 (4). If the meteoroid does not ablate very fast, i.e., m≫dm, the term vdm/dt in Eq. (4) is negligible and therefore ignored. On the other hand, the air particles in this volume will gain momentum per unit time: C𝐷 2 𝑑𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑡 𝑣 = C𝐷 2 𝐴𝑠 ( 𝑚 𝜌𝑚 2 3 𝜌𝑎𝑣2 ) (5). The drag equation can be derived by equating the loss of momentum per second of the meteoroid (mdv/dt) with the momentum gained by the air particles: 𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑡 = − C𝐷𝐴𝑠𝜌𝑎𝑣2 2𝑚1/3𝜌𝑚 2/3 (6). The negative sign in Eq. (6) indicates deceleration. The rate of mass loss is proportional to the kinetic energy of the hypersonic flow impinging on the meteoroid. This can be represented with the differential mass equation (McKinley, 1961), also known as the mass-loss equation (Ceplecha et al., 1998): 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 = − ΛA𝑠𝜌𝑎𝑣3𝑚2/3 2/3 2𝑄𝜌𝑚 (7). Here, Q is the heat of ablation of the meteoroid material (or energy required to ablate a unit mass of the meteoroid). Our goal here is to clearly develop and present the concepts related to meteor generated shock waves, something that has not been frequently done in literature. Furthermore, for the purpose of brevity and the expository nature of this review, the use of mathematical (and numerical) tools in analysis of meteor related parameters and subsequent shock wave phenomena is kept at a minimum, unless explicitly needed for the completeness of the discussion. Most of the mathematical concepts needed to study shock waves are comprehensively discussed, derived and presented in excellent monographs (e.g., Hayes et al., 1959; Bronshten, 1983; Zel'dovich et al., 2002; Anderson, 2003, 2005, 2006) and when necessary, are suggested for further reading. We now turn attention to the characterization of flow regimes and discussion about why their classical definition may not always be applicable to meteoroids in the atmosphere. 3. Knudsen Number and Flow Regimes In hypersonic gas dynamics, the Knudsen number (Kn) is one of the most important parameters when assessing shock wave formation (Anderson, 2006). The Knudsen number is the similarity parameter that characterizes the type of hypersonic flow; it is defined as the ratio of the local atmospheric mean free path to the characteristic dimension of the body (in our case, the meteoroid radius) (Silber et al., 2017a). There are four basic types of flow regimes that can be distinguished (Figure 1): 1) free molecular flow is defined for Kn > 10.0; 2) transitional flow regime exists when 0.1 < Kn < 10.0; 3) 0.01 ≤ Kn ≤ 0.1 signifies the slip flow regime, and; 4) values of Kn below 0.01 indicate continuous flow (Tsien, 1946; Anderson, 6 2006; Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). The first three flow regimes are important in rarefied gas dynamics with particular application to meteors (Silber et al., 2017a). Figure 1: Flow regimes for meteoroids in the size range from 10-5 m to 1 m in diameter, assuming (a) no increase in density over the atmospheric density, and (b) intensive ablation, which increases the density by a factor of 100. The legend in (a) is applicable to both panels. Credit: Figure digitized from Campbell-Brown and Koschny, A&A, 418, 751, 2004, reproduced with permission © ESO. It is difficult to constrain Kn for cm-sized meteoroids, because the altitudes where these objects generate shock waves are actually significantly higher than those where shock waves should form according to the onset of the classical continuum flow regime, based on physical meteoroid dimensions (Silber et al., 2015; Silber et al., 2017a; Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). Experimental interpretation of meteor generated shock waves demonstrates that they appear much earlier than predicted by classical gas dynamics theory (Brown et al., 2007; Silber et al., 2015; Silber et al., 2017a; Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). Those observations are also in line with earlier theoretical reasoning developed and specifically adopted for the theory of meteor shock waves (Bronshten, 1983 and references therein). In principle, it is well known that all bright meteors generate shock waves at altitudes where they ablate (Bronshten, 1983); the governing parameters are presented by Probstein (1961). In comparison to typically slow and much larger re-entry vehicles, meteor shock waves form at significantly higher altitudes in contrast to altitudes predicted by the classical definition of Kn and the onset of continuum flow (Gnoffo, 1999). The general appearance of meteor shock waves is in the lower portion of 7 the classically defined transitional and slip flow regime (Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). This was in a way also recognized early on (e.g., Levin, 1956; Hayes and Probstein, 1959; Bronshten, 1965, 1983). The main reason for this is the formation of ablationally amplified hydrodynamic shielding (or vapor cap) which is discussed in Section 4. For re-entry vehicles, because they are significantly larger than a typical cm-sized meteoroid and moving at comparatively much slower velocities, selection of Kn is straightforward (Anderson, 2006). Of course, for a typical hypersonic re-entry vehicle (see, for example, Gnoffo, 1999; Sarma, 2000; Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006), the onset of the continuum flow regime, which is inherently tied to the collision rate in the gas, signifies the formation of a strong shock wave front, and a flow field between the shock wave and the body - generally referred to as the shock layer. Indeed, the existence of this phenomenon, particularly in relation to ballistic and re-entry vehicles, has been known since the mid-last century, where the shock layer is relatively thin and depends on the atmospheric density, re-entry velocity and the shape of hypersonic body (Anderson, 2006). This also implies that Kn for a meteoroid must be evaluated differently (Bronshten, 1983; Boyd et al., 1995; Josyula et al., 2011). However, an ablating meteoroid is different from a typical hypersonic re-entry vehicle because of the existence of a vapor cloud in front of the meteoroid. The size of this vapor cloud (or cap) is proportional to the cube of the meteoroid velocity (Öpik, 1958; Bronshten, 1983; Popova et al., 2000; Boyd, 2000; Campbell-Brown and Koschny, 2004). For meteors, an additional complication arises due to the uncertainty in the actual size of the initial vapor shielding (which basically acts as a blunt body with a sharp interface to the surrounding air, when sufficiently dense). From an analytical perspective, another challenging aspect of the meteoroid in a rarefied flow is that the continuum equations of gas dynamics fail for sufficiently large Kn (Boyd, 2003). Large Kn means that the gas does not undergo a sufficient number of collisions to maintain equilibrium velocity distribution functions (Boyd, 2003). It is commonly assumed that failure of the continuum approach occurs at Knudsen numbers around 0.01 (Boyd et al., 1995). The solution to the general problem of evaluating object flow regimes in the rarefied atmosphere (as it applies to meteors) was recognized early on (Bronshten, 1983) and reiterated by Boyd et al. (1995) and Josyula and Burt (2011). They stated that it is better to consider local length scale and Kn associated with the flow field near the meteoroid instead of classically defined flow regimes. Comprehensive reviews of the hypersonic flow and discussion about associated complexity of the physico-chemical processes have been given by Gnoffo (1999), Sarma (2000) and Josyula and Burt (2011). More extensive reviews and the studies of rarefied gas dynamics and physical aspects of shock waves in non-continuum flow regimes can be found in work done by Hayes and Probstein (1959), Kogan (1969), Cercignani (2000), and Shen (2005). Here we use the classical hypersonic dynamics terminology and consider the velocity of the hypersonic flow in terms of the Mach number, M∞ (defined as the ratio of the flow velocity to the local speed of sound) (Anderson, 2006). In respect to meteoroids, the hypersonic flow can then be referred to as the flow of atmospheric gas over the meteoroid for which M∞ values range between 35 and 270 (e.g., Boyd, 2000). As we shall see, due to very high Mach numbers and the inherent strong ablation, the treatment of meteor hypersonic flow differs significantly in physical terms from typical supersonic or hypersonic re-entry vehicles flow. The following section is concerned with the formational dynamics and implications of the meteor vapor cap (or hydrodynamic shielding). 4. Hydrodynamic Shielding and Implications for the Shock Wave The hydrodynamic shielding in front of the ablating meteoroid (in some older literature defined as a vapor cap or vapor cloud, and here we use the terms interchangeably) is formed as the incident atmospheric molecules and atoms collide with the meteoroid surface, producing ejected, evaporated and reflected meteoric constituents and collisionally modified atmospheric atoms. The mean free path of reflected 8 molecules and atoms in the vapor cloud is also a function of Mach number, local atmosphere mean free path and meteoroid-atmosphere temperature ratio, and as such, can be expressed in those terms (see Bronshten, 1983). The constituents of this cloud may have velocities up to 1.5vmeteor (Levin, 1956; Mirtov, 1960; Rajchl, 1969). As described by Mirtov (1960), there are two categories of molecular velocities: 1) "slow" velocity, due to ablated molecules escaping at thermal velocities the surface of the meteoroid (thus mainly of meteoric composition), and 2) "fast" velocity, associated with molecules of the surrounding gas leaving the surface of the meteoroid after elastic rebound, and as such exceeding the velocity of the meteoroid itself. The latter is given by vparticles = v [1 + (1 – a)0.5], where a is the accommodation coefficient (a = 0.75 for iron and a = 0.90 for stone) (Levin, 1956; Mirtov, 1960; Rajchl, 1969). In the case when the mean free path within the hydrodynamic shielding is an order of magnitude less than the mean free path of the ambient atmosphere, the shielding effect of the cloud (Figure 2) becomes important for most meteoroids (Popova et al., 2000, 2001). The vapor cloud formation in turn initiates aerodynamic and thermal shielding, where the role of convective and radiative heat transfer during the meteoroid ablation becomes far more significant, especially following the formation of the shock wave (Öpik, 1958; Bronshten, 1983). For clarity, we note that the term meteoroid herein refers to the physical object itself, and not the object plus the vapor cloud. Figure 2. Schematic depiction of vapor shielding (after Popova et al., 2000, 2001). The contour lines and darker shading illustrate density gradients due to intensive evaporative ablation of the meteoroid and decelerated and dissociated entrained atmospheric molecules. In the regions with increasing density, higher order collisions play important role. Figure not to scale. Let us address the question of how such phenomena affect the Knudsen number, and by extension, the formation of shock waves. The presence of hydrodynamic shielding complicates the situation in two ways: 1) the species density within the shielding is progressively increasing toward the meteoroid (Popova et al., 2000), causing the mean free path in the flow field near the meteoroid to significantly decrease (in the frame of reference of the moving meteoroid (Figure 1)); 2) The relatively large density of the shielding (which itself is a function of altitude, meteoroid velocity, composition and size) prevents the direct impacts of the local atmospheric constituents on the meteoroid, and also increases the apparent dimensions of the moving structure sometimes more than two orders of magnitude relative to the initial dimensions of the meteoroid (Boyd, 2000). Therefore, the dense vapor (Figure 3) creates near continuum flow conditions around the meteoroid (Boyd et al., 1995) and consequently alters the consideration of the local Knudsen number, Knl, in the flow field around the meteoroid (see Bronshten, 1983 for discussion). This of course takes place at altitudes where the Kn associated with the local atmosphere corresponds to the transitional flow regime. 9 Figure 3: Translational temperature field from a rarefied flow model of a 1 cm-sized, -1 magnitude Leonid meteoroid (a) without ablation and (b) with ablation of Mg atoms. The modeling was done using the direct simulation Monte Carlo technique (see Jenniskens et al. (2000) for details). The simple ablation model follows Bronshten (1983). Credit: Jenniskens et al. (2000), Leonid Storm, reproduced with permission © Springer. The first point discussed above enables the application of the continuum flow when the mean free path in the vapor cloud surrounding the meteoroid is such that Knl corresponds to the aforementioned flow regime (in the reference frame of the moving object). This also allows the application of Navier-Stokes equations (Anderson, 2006) and eliminates the need for more computationally cumbersome use of the Boltzmann equation in the treatment of flow over the meteoroid. The second point is also very important because a larger area of the local atmosphere swept by the system of the moving meteoroid and the surrounding hydrodynamic shielding (Figure 3) shifts the flow regimes to higher altitudes and decreases the Knudsen number (Silber et al., 2017a and references therein; Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). However, there are large uncertainties in assessing the ablationally augmented size of the hydrodynamic shielding which effectively sweeps the region of the incident atmosphere, beyond the initial meteoroid dimensions. For example, Popova et al. (2000) estimated the size of the modeled vapor cap ahead of a centimeter-sized Leonid meteoroid and simulated a density increase in the 'vapor layer'. They obtained density values of more than two orders of magnitude higher than the density of the local region of the atmosphere. The size of the modeled vapor cloud, obtained by computational methods, is more than one order of magnitude larger than the initial meteoroid dimensions, yet relatively small in comparison with high resolution observations of the structure around a Leonid of the same size (Jenniskens et al., 2004a, Jenniskens et al., 2004b). On the other hand, Boyd (2000) simulated a 1 cm fast meteoroid associated with the Leonid meteor shower (which is known for its high impact velocity, ~72 km/s) at an altitude of 95 km (Kn = 4) and showed that during its interaction with the atmosphere, the ablated vapor cloud size significantly exceeds two orders of magnitude relative to the meteoroid particle (e.g., Jenniskens et al., 2000). The result obtained by Boyd 10 (2000) can be interpreted to agree well with the more recent study (Li et al., 2015) that presented the modeling results of a much slower flow (M∞ = 10) over a sphere-cone satellite space craft at Kn = 1.618. However, an important observation by Popova et al. (2000, 2001) indicates that below an altitude of 114 km, the pressure of the vapor cloud in front of the meteoroid will be always greater than the ambient air pressure for all bodies with sizes 0.1 mm – 100 mm. The implication is that for most meteoroids with size (dm ≥ 4 mm), the (local) continuum flow condition applies at altitudes below approximately 90 km. Additionally, in the case of a Leonid, Boyd (2000) calculated that each impinging air molecule will release about 500 meteoric particles, assuming that the meteoritic composition is chondritic. For a typical cometary particle, that number is up to five times greater depending on the velocity. Boyd's (2000) work agrees well with Bronshten's (1983) analytical treatment. In addition to producing very high-temperature chemically reactive flows, such a large number of evaporated meteoric atoms affect the overall dimensions of the aerodynamic shielding, and subsequently the formation of the shock layer. The problem of the vapor cap and its role in hydrodynamic shielding, including pressures, density and energy distribution, has been further considered by Popova et al. (2000, 2001, 2003). Their simulations confirmed that below the specific altitudes associated with the onset of intensive evaporative ablation, a dense vapor cloud forms in front and around the meteoroid which screens its surface from the direct impacts of air molecules. Their results are in line with previous theoretical arguments (Levin, 1956; Lebedinets et al., 1969; Rajchl, 1969, 1972; Bronshten, 1983). In the context of their simulation results, Popova et al. (2000) also discussed the important role of UV radiation from the compressed and intensely heated air and ablated vapor in the hydrodynamic shielding layer and extending flow field. The optical thickness of the hydrodynamic shielding strongly varies as a function of the ratio of the vapor cloud specific radial mass to the mass of non-thermal air within the vapor cap. The values of optical thickness calculated by Popova et al. (2001) are between 10−2 to 104. Up to 90% of the impinging air molecules end up entrapped in the meteor flow field while the rest escape during initial collisions with vapor (Popova et al., 2001). A recent modeling study by Johnston et al. (2018) examined radiative processes involved in the passage of large (1 – 100 m), low velocity (< 20 km/s) meteoroids at altitudes below 50 km. Based on their study, it can be expected that the optical thickness of ablating meteoroids at high altitudes is low. As outlined above, the main difficulty in constraining the meteor flow regime is the existence of the hydrodynamic shielding that forms in front of the meteoroid as a product of high energy collisions with the local atmospheric constituents. Initial direct collisions with the meteoroid surface causes the ejection of atoms from the lattice on the surface of the meteoroid (Öpik, 1958; Bronshten, 1983), followed by the subsequent evaporation of meteoroid surface atoms, which is the generally dominant mechanism of mass loss after the formation of hydrodynamic shielding. Collisional kinetic energy is at least an order of magnitude greater than the dissociation energy of atmospheric molecules; thus it is reasonable to assume that the impinging atmospheric gases are dissociated upon colliding with either the surface of the meteoroid or the constituents of the vapor shielding. Of course, the number of atmospheric incident molecules that are directly reflected from the meteor surface (albeit collisionally modified) is comparatively small relative to the ejected and vaporized meteoric atoms. It should be mentioned that the second and third order collisions (in addition to existing but less frequent higher order ones) take place in the dense region of hydrodynamic shielding. Bronshten (1983) derived a conservative analytical expression that approximates the number of meteoroid molecules and atoms ejected/evaporated during each collision with an atmospheric molecule reasonably well. He first considered the collision of a singular atmospheric molecule impacting the surface of the meteoroid (at typical meteor velocities). The energy of that molecule is then written in the canonical form 𝑚𝑎𝑣2 2 as: = 𝑁𝑣𝑄𝑚𝑚. The LHS is the kinetic energy, where ma is the mass of the air molecule and v is the velocity of the air stream over the meteoroid. On the RHS, Nv is the number of vaporizing meteoric 11 molecules/atoms, Q is the latent heat of vaporization and mm is the typical mass of meteoric molecule/atom. Solving for the number of evaporated meteoric atoms, one obtains: 𝑁𝑣 = 𝑣2 2𝑄 𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑚 (8). In addition to the latent heat of vaporization, the number of evaporated meteoric atoms depends on the ratio of the mass of the air molecule and the mass of the meteor atom and the meteoroid velocity. Considering that a spherical meteoroid surface is a reasonable approximation, it is clear that not all evaporated and ejected meteoric atoms end up in front of the meteoroid (Bronshten, 1983). Indeed, their location in the flow field depends on the angle at which the atom is ejected relative to the axis of the meteoroid propagation. In principle, the hydrodynamic shielding is considered effective when the mean free path of atoms and ions surrounding the front of the meteoroid along its axis of propagation is approximately an order of magnitude smaller than the radius of the meteoroid (Popova et al., 2003). Evaporation, as one of the ablational mechanisms, is the strongest in the case of strong shielding (Bronshten, 1983). In the absence of vapor shielding, the frictional force of the oncoming airflow causes spraying of the liquefied meteoroid surface layer. This is a dominant mechanism of mass loss, especially for the slower meteoroids. For the sizes (dm ≥ 4 mm) and velocities considered here, such ablational mechanics can be neglected for the purpose of this review, while we note that the fragmentation is an important factor of meteoroid mass loss, and much has been said about it in the literature (e.g., Artemieva et al., 1996, 2001). For the purpose of this expository review, we will only briefly revisit the topic of fragmentation in Section 8. Zinn et al. (2004) showed that by the time the vapor cloud volume has swept up a mass of air equal to its own mass, its velocity will have decreased by a factor of two, which results in a decrease of the kinetic energy transferring internal energy to the cloud. It should be noted that the evaporated and entrained constituents of the hydrodynamic shielding cloud (which have both axial and radial components of the velocity in the expanding flow field) collisionally decelerate to thermal velocities of the ambient atmosphere in several hundred meters (Zinn et al., 2004). Rajchl (1969; 1972) also considered the vapor cloud shielding in front of the meteoroid and determined that it affects the ionization efficiency coefficient and consequently the number density of free electrons in the meteor trail. In principle, the vapor or hydrodynamic shielding by reflected, ejected or evaporated atoms and molecules is an important precursor to the appearance of shock waves (see Hayes and Probstein, 1959; Probstein, 1960, 1961; Bronshten, 1965, 1983; Silber et al., 2017a). Indeed, based on the increased density of species and augmented dimensions of the vapor cloud, it is clear why the flow regime boundaries (with respect to the meteoroid) are shifted to higher altitudes. This will subsequently affect the timing and formation of the meteor shock wave front (Jenniskens et al., 2000). We need to note that the excitation, dissociation and ionization, along with radiative effects, take place within the hydrodynamic shielding (because of initial high energy collisions). The impact of such processes on shock formation and structure will be discussed shortly. However, the magnitude of such contributions strongly depends on meteoroid size, composition, velocity and of course, the Knudsen number. Additionally, an increase in velocity also shifts the flow regime of meteoroids upward. If the velocity increases from 20 km/s to 60 km/s, the flow regime boundaries shift upward between 8 - 12 km in altitude (e.g., see Bronshten, 1983 for discussion). The hydrodynamic shielding affects the drag coefficient, heat transfer and ablation coefficient. A detailed discussion about the dependency of those parameters on the vapor cap is given by Bronshten (1983). For example, the value of the drag coefficient is proportional to the Knudsen number and it decreases with decreasing Kn (as the atmosphere becomes denser). This happens because the formation of hydrodynamic shielding reduces or eliminates direct collisions of the incident atmospheric molecules and atoms with the meteoroid (Öpik, 1958; Larina, 1975; Perepukhov, 1967; Bronshten, 1983). 12 The heat transfer coefficient is dependent on the meteoroid velocity and type of flow regime, as well as on the corresponding mechanism of heat transfer that dominates in the particular flow regime (e.g., behind the shock wave front, shock layer radiation is a significant component of meteoroid heating) (Baldwin et al., 1971; Revelle, 1979; Stulov, 1997). Behind the dense hydrodynamic shielding, the heat transfer consists of both convection and radiative heating (e.g., Strack, 1962; Nerem, 1965). After formation of the hydrodynamic shielding (or vapor cloud), as the altitude decreases, the heat transfer coefficient also decreases (Popova, 2005). This is well illustrated for the case of a 1 cm Leonid in the transitional flow at 90 km altitude. For example, the heat transfer coefficient for a Leonid at this altitude is a factor of 5 lower than that if the Leonid was in the free molecular regime (Popova, 2005). The ablation coefficient (𝜎𝑎 = 𝛬/2𝑄𝐶𝐷) also depends on the meteoroid velocity (Jacchia, 1958; Verniani, 1967; Bronshten, 1983; Popova, 2005 and references within), atmospheric density and the rate of evaporation. The estimated value of ablation coefficient ranges from 0.001 s2/km2 to 0.21 s2/km2 (e.g., see Revelle, 1979; Revelle et al., 2001; Gritsevich, 2009; Bouquet et al., 2014). The heat flux received by a unit surface of the meteoroid increases with exponentially increasing atmospheric density (and the density of the hydrodynamic shielding) until the formation of the strong shielding. In the denser atmosphere below 100 km altitude, the magnitude of heat flux (which of course depends on meteoroid size and velocity) becomes much greater than the heat released by the meteoroid through radiation (Bronshten, 1983). The intense evaporation behind either a shock wave or hydrodynamic shielding becomes the dominant mechanism of ablation (for simplification, we do not consider removal of liquid droplets, fragmentation, etc.). Details of such mechanisms are discussed by Bronshten (1983). Another important parameter to consider in discussion of the flow regimes is the Reynolds number (Re) which characterizes the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces in a fluid flow. The Reynolds number can be written as: 𝑅𝑒 = 𝑣𝜌𝑎𝑑𝑚 𝜇 (9), where v, dm and ρa are the meteoroid velocity, characteristic dimensions of meteoroid and density of the ambient atmosphere, respectively. The symbol μ represents dynamic viscosity. We note that in the case of strong ablation, the problem at hand would be more complicated (e.g., see Figure 3), and as a result, dm in Eq. (9) would be replaced with the vapor cloud diameter. This expression for Re is slightly different than that used in atmospheric research, where the Reynolds number represents the ratio of the turbulent viscosity (ΚV) and the kinematic viscosity (ν), i.e., Re = ΚV/ν. With regard to the meteoroid Reynolds number, if Re ≤ 1, then viscous forces play a significant role and must be included in analytical or numerical treatment of the flow fields and subsequent formation of the shock layer. On the other hand, if Re ≥ 1, the flow tends to be inviscid. In terms of Reynolds number, Knv within the vapor cap can be written as follows (Bronshten, 1983): 𝐾𝑛𝑣 ≈ 1 𝑅𝑒 𝑣𝑣 𝑐 (10), where 𝑣𝑣 is the mean velocity of the reflected/evaporated atoms and molecules from the meteoroid surface and generally considered within the frame of reference of the vapor cloud. The speed of sound (c) is expressed as 𝑐 = (𝛾 0.5 ) 𝑘𝑇 𝑚𝑎 . Here, γ is the specific heat ratio, k is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. The mass of the atmospheric molecule is denoted by ma. The mean velocity of the evaporated molecules and atoms can be reasonably approximated as a function of the meteoroid surface temperature (Ts) and written as 𝑣𝑣 = ( 8𝑘𝑇𝑠 𝜋𝑚𝑚 0.5 ) . However, as we mentioned earlier, the velocity of reflected/ejected/evaporated atoms may be greater than the velocity of the meteoroid, in the case of specular reflection/ejection and when considered from the frame of reference of the surrounding atmosphere. It should 13 be noted that for a 1 cm meteoroid moving at 30 - 70 km/s, Re is in the range of 102 or greater below 90 km (increasing with decreasing altitude) (Bronshten, 1983). While the assumption of inviscid flow is generally valid for the hydrodynamic shielding, this consideration changes for the shock wave (essentially for the case of the boundary layer, to be discussed further in the text) (Anderson, 2006). 5. Transition from Hydrodynamic Shielding to Shock Wave The transition from the compressed vapor cloud to the shock front occurs with the meteoroid's descent to the lower altitudes (in classically defined lower transitional and slip-flow regimes). In the simplest sense, this takes place when the compressed vapor, due to the effects of the drag forces from the denser atmosphere, collapses towards the meteoroid and when the pressure and density inside the collapsed region are much higher than that of the ambient air (when a local Knudsen number corresponds to the continuum flow regime). In a strict sense however, the transition from the vapor cloud to the shock front takes place when the magnitude of the jump in pressure, density and temperature inside of the hydrodynamic shielding is large relative to the ambient air, thereby creating a discontinuity in those parameters at the shock front (Boyd et al., 1995). At this point, a rapid translational and radial expansion of the high temperature flow field behind the shock envelope around the meteoroid can be treated as a hydrodynamic flow in a vacuum (e.g., Kornegay, 1965; Masoud et al., 1969; Kustova et al., 2011). Consequently, the flow within the meteor flow field (which is encompassed by the shock envelope) can be appropriately described by the Navier-Stokes equations for compressible flow (Hayes and Probstein, 1959). In principle, the formation of the discontinuity that corresponds to the shock wave must satisfy the Rankine-Hugoniot equations (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Sachdev, 2004) (which relate the upstream and downstream values of density, bulk velocity, and temperature in an ideal compressible fluid), leading to the formation of the compressed shock layer and viscous boundary region close to the body (Probstein, 1961; Bronshten, 1983). The Rankine-Hugoniot equations (see Section 7.1.1) were derived independently by William John Macquorn Rankine in 1869 and Pierre-Henri Hugoniot in 1887 (Ben-Dor et al., 2000). These relations apply just as well to the shock waves as to blast waves, because they express the conditions at the shock front, which is treated as a discontinuity (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Needham, 2010). While the Rankine-Hugoniot equations are generalized conditions across the shock wave, for a viscous, high temperature reacting gas, considerations are more complicated because of factors such as variable heat capacity ratio (discussed further in the text) (Anderson, 2006). Some researchers such as Probstein (1961) reasoned theoretically that the onset of the shock wave is a gradual process, where the shock front, viscous shock layer, boundary layer and other shock features of the meteor shock wave (See Section 6.2) do not form instantaneously. In this respect, Probstein (1961) presented analytical arguments that the formation of the shock wave begins when the compressed layer has a thickness of the three local mean paths within the initial vapor cap before the transition to the shock. However, this may be only a reasonable approximation as the vapor cap exhibits strong density, temperature and pressure gradients (Popova et al., 2000, 2001). Whether the onset of shock formation is "instantaneous" or gradual still remains unresolved in the case of meteors. In principle, Bronshten (1983) pointed out that the shock exists and has clearly defined typical features such as a viscous and boundary layer when the apparent shock thickness is about 90 times smaller than the characteristic dimensions of a meteoroid. 6. Meteor Generated Shock Waves A simple way to conceptualize a meteor shock wave is to think of it in terms of a snow plough analogy (Bershader, 1960; Masoud et al., 1969). The gas dynamics analogy to a meteor generated shock wave is the shock wave generated by a hypersonic blunt body. The generic term used for a shock wave 14 associated with a hypersonic blunt body is the bow shock and it is also the term sometimes used in reference to meteor shock waves. While in principle this is not an incorrect terminology, further clarifications need to be made for meteor generated shock waves. This is primarily because of major differences between a typical hypersonic blunt body and a meteoroid that has a much higher Mach number of propagation, strong ablation and very low Mach cone angle Φ = sin-1 (1/M∞), which justifies the approximation of the initial paraboloid shock envelope as a cylinder. Another major difference between "regular" hypersonic blunt bodies and meteor shock waves is that the shock wave associated with the latter is analogous to the shock from a cylindrical line source (Lin, 1954; Bennett, 1958; Sakurai, 1964; Jones et al., 1968; Plooster, 1968, 1970). The meteor shock wave is essentially a paraboloid surface that can be divided, for pedantic purposes, into two distinctive shock regions as follows: i. Along the axis of meteor propagation and closely in front of the meteoroid is a roughly hemispherical shock region analogous to fore body bow shock (sometimes referred to as the ballistic shock) in hypersonic blunt bodies, that forms first when the hydrodynamic shielding collapses and densities, velocities and temperatures can be treated as discontinuities across the shock front. Here, instead of fore body bow shock, we refer to it as the shock in front of the meteoroid (essentially a hemispheric surface of high temperature, pressure and flow velocity discontinuity, in front of the meteoroid). This is also a meteor shock region with maximum dissociation, excitation and ionization effects. Let us recall that the strength of the shock wave is directly proportional to the pressure behind the shock front, primarily because the pressure is a mechanical variable (Anderson, 2006). The pressure behind the shock front is directly proportional to the free stream velocity and for a high 2 . The speed meteoric flow where v2 << v1, and p2 >> p1 and can be approximated as 𝑝2 ≈ 𝜌1𝑣1 subscripts 1 and 2 denote the parameters associated with the free stream and the shock layer, respectively. ii. The bow shock wave behind the meteoroid (a continuous transition from the shock wave in front of the meteoroid) (also see Section 6.2), which is essentially a surface of a paraboloid meteor shock envelope in the far field, and is herein referred to as a cylindrical shock wave (Sakurai, 1964, 1965). It should be reiterated that the cylindrical shock wave is essentially a continuous extension of the shock envelope that begins with the shock in front of the meteoroid discussed above. Correspondingly, an additional clarification needs to be made here. The primary cylindrical shock wave (basically the bow shock wave) propagates radially outward and it is trailed by a strong and ablationally amplified recompression shock wave (Silber et al., 2017a). For clarity of this exposition, we do not distinguish here between the bow and recompression shock waves. However, the distinction is made in Silber et al. (2017a), and illustrated in Section 6.2. It must be emphasized that in the case of meteors, both types of shock waves are ablationally amplified and as they coalesce rapidly, they cannot be individually distinguished beyond the boundaries of the initial radius of the meteor train (in terms of spatial coordinates) and especially outside of the immediate region of maximum energy deposition with the characteristic radius R0 (to be defined shortly) (ReVelle, 1974, 1976; Silber et al., 2015; Silber et al., 2019). Here, we refer to both the initial meteor bow shock wave and a recompression driven shock wave as simply a cylindrical shock wave. Indeed, meteor cylindrical shock waves in the strong shock regime are the primary topic of this review. Cylindrical shock waves attenuate rapidly and transition to the weak shock regime within approximately ten characteristic radii (R0) (ReVelle, 1974, 1976; Silber et al., 2015). Since this topic is well covered in literature, only a limited discussion on weak shock is given in the infrasound section (Section 10.2). 15 6.1 Shock Definition Before further discussion about the nature and dynamics of meteor shock waves continues, we shall establish the definition of shock waves based on the classical shock wave literature. For the purpose of completeness of this expository review, we present several different definitions of the shock waves. First, we need to note that any object moving at velocities higher than the local speed of sound of the medium creates a disturbance which is called a shock wave. This is true when the density of the medium and characteristic dimension of an object satisfy the conditions for a continuum flow regime. The term wave, however, implies a time dependent phenomenon. In shock waves, the time dependent phenomenon is the region of the flow immediately behind the shock front, where thermodynamic parameters change rapidly (Hurle, 1967). Therefore, in conceptual terms, one can define the shock wave as the region of rapid change of thermodynamic parameters of the gas parcel flow immediately ahead of the cylindrical shock front. Specifically, we are interested in the change from their initial 'equilibrium' to their 'final' values directly behind the shock front. However, in reality the matter is far more complex (Cercignani, 2000; Brun, 2009, 2012). In a more technical sense, a shock wave can be described as a discontinuous surface that connects supersonic flow with subsonic flow (Niu, 2009). After the atmospheric molecule impacts and passes through the shock wave front, its flow velocity is then dramatically reduced and can no longer be considered as part of the hypersonic flow (see Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006). Therefore, an irreversible adiabatic compression with accompanying sharp decrease of velocity and a jump in density behind the shock front cause almost instantaneous increase in pressure, temperature and entropy. In principle, the flow behind the shock front is in non-equilibrium, and irreversible processes occur inside the shock layer (Niu, 2009). Finally, following the most formal definition (Ben-Dor et al., 2000), shock waves can be characterized as mechanical waves of finite amplitudes that arise when matter is subjected to a rapid compression. The characteristic properties of shock waves can be distinguished by: (i) a pressure-dependent, supersonic velocity of propagation; (ii) the formation of a steep wave front with abrupt change of all thermodynamic quantities; (iii) for nonplanar shock waves, a strong decrease of the propagation velocity with increasing distance from the center of origin; and (iv) nonlinear superposition (reflection and interaction) properties. In the strict mathematical sense however, shock waves cannot be treated as simple discontinuities in rarefied gasses (Cercignani, 2000). Zel'dovich and Raizer (2002) discussed this and stated that from a mathematical perspective, a shock wave discontinuity can be regarded as the limiting case of much larger but finite gradients in flow variables across the shock layer whose thickness tends to zero. An analysis of shock waves, their dynamics, nature and types is given, for example, by Hayes and Probstein (1959), Liberman et al. (1986), Ben-Dor et al. (2000), Cercignani (2000), Zel'dovich and Raizer (2002), Sachdev (2004), Anderson (2006), Krehl (2009), Brun (2012), among others. Additional works covering relevant and shock related aspects of high temperature and rarefied gas dynamics are presented by Kogan (1969), Shen (2005), Brun (2009) and Bose (2014). However, our emphasis returns now to aspects of the meteor generated shock waves, which are the primary focus of this paper. At this point it is important to emphasize that due to the initial high translational temperatures and strong amplification by ablation (vaporization), the shock waves produced by a meteoroid are significantly stronger than the comparative shock wave in the case of no ablation and/or from a re-entry vehicle. For typical meteoroid velocities, a massive amount of flow kinetic energy in a hypersonic free stream is converted to internal energy of the gas across the strong shock in front of the meteoroid, hence producing very high temperatures in the shock layer region. High temperatures (T ≥ 11,000 K) in the front shock layer (Anderson, 2006) (including the sonic and boundary region which will be defined shortly), along with densities and pressures that exceed that of the ambient air by several orders of magnitude (Bronshten, 16 1983), are instrumental in approximating meteor cylindrical shock waves as explosive line sources (e.g., Lin, 1954; Bennett, 1958; Sakurai, 1964; Jones et al., 1968; Plooster, 1968; Tsikulin, 1970). This approximation is valid as a large amount of energy is released per unit length in a finite cylindrical volume (Lin, 1954; Plooster, 1968; Tsikulin, 1970; ReVelle, 1974, 1976; Steiner et al., 1994). The radius of a cylindrical region with the maximum meteor energy deposition per unit length is referred to as the characteristic or blast radius (R0) and can be expressed as: 𝑅0 = (𝐸0/𝑝0)0.5, where E0 is the energy deposited per unit path length (which in the case of a meteoroid is the same as the total aerodynamic drag per unit length) and p0 is the ambient pressure (e.g., Tsikulin, 1970; ReVelle, 1974, 1976; Silber et al., 2015; Silber and Brown, 2019). There are slight variations to the expression for R0 (Sakurai, 1964; Jones et al., 1968; Few, 1969; Plooster, 1968; Tsikulin, 1970; also see Infrasound, Section 10.2), resulting in a difference by a factor of ~3.5 (ReVelle, 1974; Silber, 2014; Silber and Brown, 2019). The term characteristic radius is used only in reference to strong shock waves, when the energy release (E0) is sufficiently large so that the internal energy of the ambient atmosphere is negligible (Lin, 1954; Hutchens, 1995). However, practical real time detections of meteor generated shock waves at the characteristic altitudes of formation in the upper atmosphere (for dm ≥ 4 mm), have not been possible up to this point because of the rapid spatial and temporal attenuation of the shock waves in the rarefied atmosphere, complicated further by the presence of luminous phenomena. 6.2 Meteor Shock Wave Morphology Figure 4 represents a schematic of a meteoroid shock envelope and flow fields. In the next few paragraphs, bracketed numbers will refer to Figure 4 unless otherwise stated. The paraboloid surface of shock wave envelope (2) that surrounds the initial meteoroid (1) flow field is the extension of the shock front (3) ahead of the meteoroid. The detached and relatively thin shock front (Taniguchi et al., 2014), characterized by a large gradient in temperature, pressure and velocity, occurs where the viscous and conductive transport phenomena dominate. Because the shock front is generally very thin, the fluid element (i.e., a molecule) can only experience a limited number of high energy collisions and because of the short time scale, the effects of those collisions (such as vibrational equilibration, dissociation, ionization) take place behind the shock front. Thus, we can say that the flow through the shock front is chemically frozen. However, that is not always the case and it gets progressively more complicated with the presence of strong radiative phenomena, which modify the ambient air near the meteoroid and along the axis of its propagation. In a general analysis of the shock waves, the value of 𝜌2 𝜌1 plays an important role in the determination of the shock detachment distance δ for the hypersonic body. It is generally acceptable to express the ratio of the shock detachment distance and the specific radius of the body rm, in terms of density ratios (see Anderson, 2006), and it can be written as: 𝛿 𝑟𝑚 = 𝜌1 𝜌2 1+√2( 𝜌1 𝜌2 ) (11). In the limit of high velocities, the shock detachment distance becomes very small because 𝜌1 𝜌2 << 1 . Here, we can indirectly see the effects of chemistry (i.e., dissociation) on the shock detachment distance. As dissociation and consequently the number species density increases, this leads to the decrease of the shock detachment distance (Bronshten, 1965; Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006). When the shock front ahead of the meteoroid transitions into the much weaker and radially expanding cylindrical shock wave, then the streamlines of particles entrained behind the original meteor shock front become part of the cylindrical shock wave. Correspondingly, the Mach number of the streamlines in the shock flow field at the edge of the boundary layer (5) has a strong influence on the stability of the 17 laminar boundary layer (Beckwith, 1975; Anderson, 2006) at the transition region where flow becomes turbulent in the meteor flow field. The region behind the detached shock front consisting of sonic (4), viscous boundary (5) and stagnation region (6) layers, is fundamentally a thin region with very strong gradients of pressure, kinetic temperature and density resulting from continued adiabatic compression of the vaporized meteoric atoms and impinging atmospheric gas. Figure 4: Schematics of the meteor shock wave(s), flow fields and near wake. The meteoroid is considered as a blunt body (with the spherical shape) propagating at hypersonic velocity from left to right. The left side represents the side view, while the right side represents the head-on view (after Hayes and Probstein (1959); Lees et al. (1962)). The definitions and explanations are provided in the text. (1) Meteoroid; (2) Cylindrical (bow) shock wave envelope; (3) The shock front; (4) Sonic region; (5) Boundary layer; (6) Stagnation point; (7) Turbulent region (in some older literature, this is referred as the dead water region); (8) The neck and recompression region; (9) The 'free' shear layer; (10) The recompression region (a source of recompression and ablationally amplified cylindrical shock wave) shock wave front; (11) The region of turbulent "plasma" flow and adiabatic expansion. The diagram is only for the illustrative purpose and is not to scale. At this time it is useful to recall that shock properties are going to be governed by chemistry, pressure and temperature. The choice of specific heat ratios (which depend on chemistry, temperature, pressure) affects the geometry of the initial shock front region (Bronshten, 1965; Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006) and shock layer thickness (Figure 5). Additionally, meteoroid shock wave thickness depends on dissociation rates of atmospheric molecules and evaporation rates (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). The assumption of γ = 1.4 is appropriate for approximations; however, it is not valid in rigorous analytical and numerical treatment of the shock wave, as can be seen in Figure 5 (Steiner and Gretler, 1994). The effects of dissociation, electronic excitation and ionization must be considered when choosing appropriate specific heats ratio for the analysis of meteor shock waves and associated flow fields. Notably, the gas specific heat ratio affects the thickness of the boundary layer. 18 Figure 5. The dependence of shock wave shape and thickness on the various values of ratio of specific heats (after Bronshten, 1965). Direction of meteoroid propagation is left to right. Note that the diagram is not to scale. The flow field between the shock front and the meteoroid is defined as the shock layer, and for hypersonic speeds this shock layer can be quite thin. The shock layer in front of the meteoroid is characterized by an almost instantaneous increase in temperature, density and entropy (Anderson, 2006) and consists of the sonic region (4), where the flow velocity is decelerated to subsonic values and of the viscous boundary layer (5). The boundary layer is the region adjacent to a surface where the effects of molecular friction (viscosity), thermal conduction and radiative heating are dominant. The flow outside of the boundary layer can be treated as inviscid. The viscous boundary layer envelopes the meteoroid and is a region where non-equilibrium processes occur (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006). In particular, the thickness of this layer depends on the mean free path, chemical reactions, and the ratio of the specific heats. The shock layer becomes infinitesimally thin and infinitely dense in the limit where 𝑀∞ → ∞ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝛾 → 0 . The specific heat ratio plays a key role in the study of shock waves properties. To illustrate this, consider (in the simple case of an ideal gas), for example, the limiting density or a volume ratio across the shock wave is a direct function of γ, as can be seen from 𝜌2 𝜌1 = 𝑉1 𝑉2 = 𝛾+1 𝛾−1 , where ρ1 and V1 are initial density and volume of the upstream flow and ρ2 and V2 correspond to the values of density and volume of the compressed region behind the shock wave (see Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). However, at high pressures and temperatures, the specific heats and their ratio are no longer constant. As we have seen from an earlier discussion, this is due to the presence of intensive dissociation, ionization, radiative and other nonequilibrium processes (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). In shock waves, viscosity and heat conduction are a dissipative process and are functions of the molecular structure of a 'fluid' (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). Such waves are generally associated with the boundary layer and appear only in the case of large gradients in the flow variables (e.g., velocity, density, temperature). It should be added that the thickness of the shock layer is greater at higher altitudes (e.g., for illustrative examples see Li et al., 2015). Moreover, the shock layers may be optically thin, characterized by the absence of re-absorption of radiation emitted from other parts of the gas. On the other hand, in an optically thick shock layer re-absorption of radiation is significant and radiation must be considered as a separate source of energy. Correspondingly, the modeling of optically thick gases is extremely difficult, since, due to the calculation of the radiation at each point, the computation load theoretically expands exponentially as the number of points considered increases (e.g., Sarma, 2000). 19 The highest translational temperatures (T >> 11,000 K) within the shock layer are found in a comparatively small stagnation region (6) which is localized within the boundary layer (and also part of the sonic region). However, the heating in the stagnation region varies inversely with the square root of the characteristic radius of the meteoroid. Hence, bigger meteoroids will not reach temperatures much greater than cm sized ones (because of much greater radius of the blunt region). This was also experimentally verified (Koppenwallner, 1984). Zinn and Drummond (2005) showed numerically that high temperature regions persist in the coma at significant distances (Figure 6). Figure 6: Plot showing modeled contours in the wake of a 526 g Leonid meteor with an entry angle of 42° (Zinn and Drummond, 2005). Credit: digitized Figure 5 from Zinn and Drummond (2005), JGR, 116, A04306, reproduced with permission © John Wiley and Sons. High meteor temperatures have been observationally confirmed in meteor coma and imply the presence of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) (e.g., Berezhnoy and Borovička, 2010). Harvey (1973) observed the temperatures of 20,000 K, while Ceplecha (1973) observed spectral lines of atomic oxygen corresponding to temperatures of about 14,000 K in meteor wakes. Borovička (1994) concluded that meteor wake temperatures of 10,000 K are relatively common, and represent the temperature of only a small fraction of the ablated meteor flow field volume. However, Borovička (1994) stated that such high temperatures are due to meteor shock waves. This is consistent with conclusions made from the observation of the Perseid fireball spectrum in which a high temperature component was determined to originate as a result of meteor shock (Borovička et al., 2006). Jenniskens et al. (2004a) obtained the spectrum emitted from the meteor trails corresponding to temperatures of about 4,400 K and demonstrated that the thermalization is significantly slower than previously theoretically considered. They concluded that the variation of meteor plasma emission temperatures for meteoroids in the range of masses between 10-5 g and 106 g is only up to several hundred Kelvin. In comparison to initially enormous kinetic temperatures exceeding tens of thousands of K (Boyd, 2000; Silber et al., 2017a), these observations can be attributed to energy loss as a result of radiative emissions and intense dissociative, exciting and ionizing collisions behind the shock. These collisions lead to internal energy exchange between translational and internal degrees of freedom and result in excitation, dissociation, ionization and radiation. In the compressed shock layer, the excess internal energy in turn 20 facilitates various non-equilibrium and hyperthermal chemical reactions (Berezhnoy and Borovička, 2010; Panesi et al., 2011; Brun, 2012) further down in the reactive high temperature meteoroid flow fields (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006; Brun, 2009). We shall digress for a moment here for the purpose of completeness. Let us define τf as a characteristic time for a fluid element to travel the distance of the flow field, approximated by the ratio of the characteristic length of the flow field and upstream velocity of the gas before the shock front, and τc as the characteristic time for the chemical reactions. The "equilibrium flow" (see Anderson, 2006) is characterized by 𝜏𝑓 ≪ 𝜏𝑐. A non-equilibrium flow is defined in all other cases (Anderson, 2006). Inadequate choice of specific heats ratio (e.g., γ = 1.4) can be the source of large errors in calculating the temperatures behind shock wave. This is best illustrated if we compare temperatures in the shock layer of the Apollo lunar re-entry module. The calculated translational temperature behind the shock wave (M∞ = 32.5; h = 53 km) is 58,128 K. The actual temperature is about 11,600 K (Anderson, 2006). Therefore, it is important to use chemically reacting real gas in calculations as it prevents large over-prediction in the calculated temperature. That is because the directed kinetic energy of the flow, when converted across the shock wave, is shared across all molecular modes of energy, and utilized in zero-point energy of the products of chemical reaction. Thus, we want to emphasize again the importance of strong effects that dissociation, ionization, radiation and hyperthermal chemistry processes have on the temperature reduction behind the meteor shock wave. As noted earlier, if the shock-layer temperature is high enough, the fluid elements in the flow will emit and absorb radiation. This causes the meteor flow field to become non-adiabatic. Moreover, strong radiation increases pressure in the shock layer by influencing the dissociation rates. For general hypersonic velocities greater than 7 km/s (e.g., Kemp, 1959; Keck et al., 1959; Kivel, 1961; Camm et al., 1961; Strack, 1962; Nerem, 1965; Reis, 1967; Anderson, 1969; Levin et al., 1993; Erdman et al., 1993) the energy is converted to radiation in the stagnation region (Bronshten 1983). At meteor velocities, radiative heat transfer is more efficient in comparison to convective stagnation-point heat transfer (Anderson, 1967, 1969; Sutton, 1985). However, radiative cooling also has an important role in the reduction of high kinetic temperatures behind the shock front. Anderson (1967) presents a major survey of radiative shock layer effects associated with hypersonic flight dynamics. At meteor velocities, a large component of the radiation from the radiating volume behind the shock front is in the UV spectrum and is responsible for preheating and modifying the atmospheric region ahead of the meteor axis of propagation, where high energy photon fluxes from the shock layer are absorbed by the ambient air (Cook et al., 1960). The mean free path of UV radiation between 100 – 120 km altitude ranges from about 300 to 3,000 m, respectively (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). The radiation from the stagnation region is also responsible for heating the meteoroid, as well as for additional modification of the meteor flow field. Strong radiation (including UV) from the meteor shock region (the strongest radiating volume is within the stagnation region) is responsible for the ionization and dissociation of the local atmosphere swept by some solid angle ahead of the meteoroid axis of travel (Cook and Hawkins, 1960; Jenniskens et al., 2004a). This mechanism effectively creates more dense local atmosphere in front of the meteoroid axis of propagation and effectively decreases Kn (some discussion is given in ReVelle (2001)). However, in the specific case of meteors, while the observational spectral evidence shows strong UV emissions from meteors (Borovička et al., 1998; Carbary et al., 2003), especially the region behind the meteor shock, the quantitative assessment of the flux of high energy photons and the role of the ambient atmosphere modification ahead of the meteoroid is still poorly understood (Jenniskens et al., 2004a). One of the reasons for this is that the precise values of optical thickness of the meteor shock layer remain relatively uncertain at the moment. Strong radiative processes from the shock layer (Figure 4) that contribute significantly to the heating of the meteoroid body and vaporization process behind the shock layer have been extensively considered by 21 several authors (Nemchinov et al., 1963; Stulov, 1972; Gershbein, 1974; Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002). Additionally, radiation also affects the value of γ (Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002) and consequently influences the shock layer thickness and mean free path by dissociation of molecules that initially might have passed through the shock front undissociated. We now again refer to Figure 4. Note the bracketed numbers in the following paragraphs again refer to the numbers in Figure 4. Behind the meteoroid, the boundary layer transitions into a 'free' shear layer (9), which exhibits strong gradients in velocities between the outer and inner flows. In both regions, the ablated meteor vapor, mixed with the entrained collisionally modified atmospheric gases, is driven toward the recompression region (or the neck) (8). The maximum compression of the high temperature non-equilibrium aft flow takes place in the neck region (8). Further down in the flow (behind the meteoroid), this region is also the source of the strong recompression shock (10) for strongly ablated bodies where the flow velocity has both radial and axial components. The recirculation zone (7) is driven by the pressure gradients, and the flow circulates back toward the aft end of the body and outward toward the shear layer separation point (Gnoffo, 1999). The flow field of the ablated and evaporated material encapsulating the meteoroid and extending into the near wake can be described by the Navier-Stokes equations for continuity, momentum and energy. While equations for continuity and momentum are purely mechanical and not affected by chemical processes, the energy equation needs to take into consideration viscous, thermal and chemical effects in the hypersonic gas flow (Anderson, 2006). Further back in the wake (11), the ablated meteor vapor and plasma experience initially strong turbulence (Lees and Hromas, 1961, 1962) during the adiabatic expansion into a more dynamically stable volume with radius r0 (discussed earlier) that is in pressure, but not in temperature, equilibrium with the ambient atmosphere. Thermodynamic equilibrium cannot be achieved in the meteor flow field (including the near wake). However, only a local thermodynamic equilibrium (which is highly altitude dependent) may be achieved (Berezhnoy and Borovička, 2010). In rarefied flow conditions, i.e., for small Reynolds numbers, the shock waves and viscous layers are thick (e.g., see numerical model by Li et al., 2015). Consequently, under such conditions a classical gas dynamics approach for the analysis of flows and shock waves may be challenging to implement. 6.3 Pressure Behind the Shock Wave – Initial Approximation The ratio of pressures behind the shock wave and in the upstream of the ambient atmosphere is the most important and singular parameter that determines the strength and subsequent effects of the meteor generated shock wave. Let us see how we can approximate it initially. As mentioned earlier in this section, a simple way to conceptualize a meteor shock wave is in terms of a snow plough analogy (Bershader, 1960; Masoud et al., 1969). Another way to visualize a meteor shock wave is to think of a meteor flow field, driven radially by a hypersonically expanding piston (e.g., see discussion in Lin, 1954; Bennett, 1958; Sakurai, 1964; Jones et al., 1968; Anderson, 2006). A strong cylindrical shock wave propagates radially from the point of an 'instantaneous' energy release. This again illustrates why meteor shock waves are often referred to as cylindrical blast waves and why they are analogous to the blast wave theory as developed by Sedov (1946) and Taylor (1950). Of course, we know that the situation is significantly more complicated, as one needs to account for the strong ablation and extremely high flow field temperatures and pressures (i.e., Zinn et al., 2004; Zinn and Drummond, 2005). The following discussion is helpful in addressing the more detailed treatment of meteor shock waves later in the text. In the case when the pressure ahead of shock wave can be neglected, asymptotic formulas for velocity, density, and pressure near the center of the explosion (in the strong shock regime) can be obtained from self-similarity principles developed by Sedov (1946) and Taylor (1950). For example, the pressure 22 resulting from cylindrical blast waves (Sedov, 1946; Lin, 1954; Sakurai, 1964) can be expressed as a function of deposited energy (essentially drag resistance per unit length): 𝑝 = 𝐾𝜌0 ( 𝐸 𝜌0 0.5 ) 𝑡−1 (12), . From the equivalence principle (Sedov, 1946; Taylor, 1950; Anderson, 2006) we can where 𝐾 = 2(𝛾−1) 2−𝛾 ] [ 𝛾 [ 4−𝛾 2−𝛾 ] 2 define time t as 𝑡 = 𝑥 𝑉0 . The above expression (Eq. (12)) for pressure is in good agreement with experimental results (Lukasiewicz, 1962; Sakurai, 1953, 1954). The pressure distribution (ratio) in the case of shock waves produced by a hypersonic blunt cylinder, derived from the first approximation (see Anderson, 2006 for discussion) can be expressed as: 𝑝 𝑝0 = 0.067𝑀∞ 2 √𝐶𝐷 (𝑥/𝑑) (13), where the subscript 0 denotes the conditions ahead of the blast wave, x is the distance traveled by the blunt body in some time interval, d is the diameter of the blunt object and M∞ and CD are the Mach number of the flow and drag coefficient of the blunt body, respectively. It should be noted that because of the factor (x/d) this expression allows an approximation of the pressure in the meteor wake, just before the equilibration with the ambient atmosphere (which coincides with the formation of the meteor trail with initial radius r0). For a 1/2, and inversely blunt-nosed body, the pressure distribution p/p0 is directly proportional to M∞ proportional to x/d (Anderson, 2006). 2 and CD As we shall see shortly, these first order analytical and empirical approximations (Anderson, 2006) used in hypersonic dynamics of re-entry bodies provide reasonable approximations for ablating meteors, however they do not account for the effects of high temperature and meteoric ablation. We should keep in mind though that these are only approximations and for actual meteor flow fields, their values might be understated because of large uncertainty associated with hydrodynamic shielding and the initial shock envelope effect on CD, the variable specific heat ratio and strong ablation and non-equilibrium flows which impact species density in the flow field behind the shock. While, for example, the pressure behind the shock wave in front of the meteoroid is mainly a function of drag force, the pressure (which characterizes the strength of the shock wave) in the flow field behind the meteoroid that drives the cylindrical shock is a function of ablation rate, chemistry and temperature. 6.4 Meteor Kinetic Energy Transferred to the Ablated Vapor In terms of an analytical treatment of the meteor cylindrical shock wave, it can be approximated using a geometric argument (see Anderson, 2006). A better approach, at least in the region of the strong shock, is to use similarity principles (Sedov, 1946; Taylor, 1950) and to evaluate the shock wave based on the energy released per unit length (or cylindrical line source). In the case of meteors, because of the strong ablation and strong energy deposition along the axis of propagation by ablated vapor (Zinn et al., 2004), the second approach is better. Approximately 99% of energy deposited by the meteoroid per unit length and in a "confined" cylindrical volume comes from collisional stoppage of ablated compressed vapor. The latter expands behind the shock envelope and has both a radial and axial component of velocity (Zinn et al., 2004). This is in line with earlier estimates of the meteor kinetic energy partition and conversion (Romig, 1964). Zinn et al. (2004) pointed out correctly that the "drag energy" of the solid meteoroid transfer to the impinging atmospheric gas is negligible in comparison. This can be also understood in the context of the loss and partition of the meteoroid kinetic energy which can be written as the loss of meteoroid kinetic energy: 23 𝑑𝐸 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 𝑚𝑣2 ( 2 ) = 𝑚𝑣 𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑡 + 𝑣2 2 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 (14). Here, the first term on the LHS represents the energy lost per unit of time, and m and v are the meteoroid mass and velocity, respectively (e.g., Romig, 1964; Gritsevich and Koschny, 2011). Dividing both sides by the velocity (v) (Bronshten, 1983) the energy deposition per unit path length can be obtained: 𝑑𝐸 𝑑𝑙 = 𝑚 𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑡 + 𝑣 2 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 (15). The first term on the right in Eq. (15) is the energy used to form the bow shock wave, assuming no ablation. The second term then is the energy partitioned to the ablation and lost to the ablated vapor per unit length and accounts for the 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 . After some manipulation, this can be expressed as: 𝑣 2 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑑𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑙 = 𝐴 2 𝜌𝑎𝑣4 (16), where A is a function of the drag coefficient, the cross-sectional area of the meteoroid, the heat transfer coefficient and the heat of vaporization, and is also different for meteoroids with different properties (see Zinn et al., 2004 for derivation). This was originally considered by Dobrovol'skii (1952), subsequently verified by other researchers (Bronshten, 1983) and implemented in numerical modeling (Zinn and Drummond, 2005). Bronshten (1983) showed that the second term on the RHS of Eq. (15) is utilized to describe the formation of the comparatively stronger ablationally amplified meteor shock wave. Taking the ratio of the RHS terms in Eq. (15) viz., 𝑣 2 𝑑𝑚 𝑑𝑡 /𝑚 𝑑𝑣 𝑑𝑡 , the second term may be up to two orders of magnitude larger than the first term (Dobrovol'skii, 1952; Bronshten, 1983). Of course, this ratio depends on the meteoroid velocity, composition and the rate of ablation. We should emphasize that the energy required to completely vaporize the meteoroid is negligible compared to its initial kinetic energy. As can be seen from the discussion above, it is the rapid deceleration and expansion of the high temperature ablated vapor which drives and amplifies the strength of meteor cylindrical shock waves (Zinn et al., 2004). Let us again revisit the pressure behind the shock wave envelope of ablating meteor. 6.5 The Pressure Ratio Revisited The pressure ratios of the ablated, vaporized meteoroid and plasma, mixed with dissociated atmospheric gases in the flow field (p) to that of the ambient atmosphere (p0) for a meteoroid with 1 cm radius, are in the range 102< p/p0< 104 (Bronshten, 1983). This is particularly true for events with velocities exceeding 30 km/s, where much more energy is transferred to the flow field vapor and plasma behind the shock front, than is spent on the ablation process. It is the dispersion of this ablated and pressurized "vapor" in the front of the meteoroid that amplifies the shock wave (Dobrovol'skii, 1952; Bronshten, 1983; Zinn et al., 2004). The experimental evaluation of the effects of pressure ratios (in the similar range as above) on the velocity and strength of the shock waves was performed by Kornegay (1965). Typical energies of cm-sized meteoroids, assumed to be released instantaneously per unit length along the axis of propagation, may readily exceed several kJ/m (Zinn et al., 2004; Silber et al., 2015). The strength and therefore speed of a meteor produced shock wave principally depends on the pressure difference between the pressure behind the initial shock envelope and the ambient pressure (e.g., Hurle, 1967; Bronshten, 1983; Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Anderson, 2006). In practice, p/p0 can be relatively easy to compute based on initially known meteoroid parameters (Bronshten, 1965; Tsikulin, 1970; Bronshten, 1983). For one-cm chondritic meteoroids moving at average meteor velocities, at the stage of maximum ablation, p/p0 term readily reaches 104 (Bronshten, 1983). Several factors contribute to the increase in pressure jump behind the initial meteor shock envelope and affect the strength of the meteor cylindrical 24 shock wave. Those are the meteoroid size, velocity and the initial flow translational temperatures, rate of ablation and classically determined Knudsen number value. Initial high temperatures behind the meteor shock front that readily exceed 11,000 K (Anderson, 2006) contribute, together with a high number density of ablated/evaporated meteoric atoms and entrapped impinging shock dissociated atmospheric molecules, to the pressure increase that drives the meteor shock wave. We emphasize again that pressure can easily reach four orders of magnitude higher than that of the ambient pressure (Bronshten, 1983). The cylindrical shock wave velocity (or Mach number) and subsequently the shock strength can be easily obtained from the classically derived expression for the pressure behind the shock front which is generally evaluated using the Hugoniot relationship. This relates the vapor pressure behind the shock (p) and the ambient pressure (p0) to the product of shock Mach number (Msw) and the ratio of specific heats (γ) (e.g., Lin, 1954; Jones et al., 1968; Tsikulin, 1970): 𝑝 𝑝0 = 2𝛾 𝛾+1 2 𝑀𝑠𝑤 (17). This relationship can be used in the region of the strong shock wave where p>>p0 (Lin, 1954; Jones et al., 1968). Because pressure is a "mechanical" variable (see Anderson, 2006), the assumed value of γ, corresponding to an ideal gas, will not significantly alter the value of the ratio in the expression above. However, for temperature, as we shall see, the situation is quite different (Anderson, 2006). The empirically derived relations for the density, pressure and temperature ratios (see Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002) that describe well the experimental observations in the region of the strong shock wave (Jones et al., 1968; Plooster, 1970 and references therein) are written as: 6 1+5𝑀𝑠𝑤 7 2 − 𝑀𝑠𝑤 6 −2 (18a), 1 6 (18b), = = 𝜌′ 𝜌0 𝑃′ 𝑃0 1 36 𝑇′ 𝑇0 = (7 − 𝑀𝑠𝑤 −2)(𝑀𝑠𝑤 2 + 5) (18c). Here, following the notation of Zel'dovich and Raizer (2002). ρ0, p0, T0 are the density, pressure and temperature ahead of the shock wave, respectively; and ρ', p', T' are the values just behind the shock front. These equations (18a-c), alone or in combination, may be used to obtain the unknown parameters behind the strong cylindrical shock wave (for details see Zel'dovich and Raizer, 2002; Hurle, 1967). However, while Eqs. (18a,b) are reasonably accurate in the strong shock regime, caution must be exercised with the closed analytical form of Eq. (18c), as the temperature ratio might be considerably overestimated (Anderson, 2006). While the in-depth review of meteor shock waves concludes at this juncture, we shall continue our discussion on analytical and numerical treatment of meteor hypersonic flow (Section 7), meteoroid fragmentation (Section 8), shock waves in the context of larger objects that produce airbursts and pose impact hazard (Section 9), as well as radar and infrasound detections of meteor generated shock waves (Section 10). These sections will provide the reader with a broader picture and understanding of shock wave related phenomena. 7. Analytical and Numerical Treatment of Meteor Hypersonic Flow The main challenge in analytically and computationally analyzing meteor flow fields and shock waves in a rarefied atmosphere (where Kn is high and shifts to the transitional flow regime) is that the continuum equations are also invalid in regions of very low density. Thermal non equilibrium is another aspect of rarefied flows. The validity of the continuum equations is inherently tied to the collision rate in the gas (Josyula and Burt, 2011). At high altitudes, the rarefied atmosphere does not behave like a continuum 25 medium, and when a relatively small number of particles occupy the flow field of interest, the continuum hypothesis is obviously invalidated, as large regions of the flow field may contain no particles at all. This problem and analysis of shock waves in a rarefied environment is discussed by Cercignani (2000) and Lago et al. (2012). Thus, the question is: when does a continuum approach fail in the treatment of shock fronts and how does that affect the shock waves in a rarefied flow? Boyd (2003) discussed the parameters that predict the continuum breakdown, and the efficiency and validity of those criteria under specific conditions. The existing breakdown parameters that are based on the flow field gradients are unable to predict a breakdown in the shock front because the Navier-Stokes equations can only model very thin shocks. However, the parameter based on the local Knudsen number that describes the flow field, rather than the classically defined Kn, is more reliable to predict continuum breakdown at the body surface and in the downstream at the edge of the shock wave (where the Navier-Stokes equations are still valid). In the frame of reference of the meteor shock wave in the rarefied atmosphere, much denser meteor ablated vapor and plasma expand in the rarefied ambient atmospheric gas. Considering initial large density pressure and temperature gradients in the flow field in the meteoroid near-wake, such radial expansion of the meteor vapor and plasma behind the shock wave can be approximated as a continuum flow into vacuum, until the point where the flow is rarefied and the continuum breaks down. It must be emphasized again that in the case of ablating meteoroids, a strong cylindrical shock wave is driven by "dispersion" of high temperature ablated vapor and plasma (Bronshten, 1983; Zinn et al., 2004). Thus, for a strongly ablating meteoroid following the formation of the shock wave, the flow regime within the flow field bound by the initial shock envelope is a continuum; however, in the wake of the meteoroid, the flow field expands and becomes rarefied. In this region, the continuum equations are not valid and the Boltzmann equation (Boltzmann, 1872) should be used. The Boltzmann equation here is the governing equation in the microscopic description of a dilute gas flow, and is a nonlinear integro-differential equation for a probability distribution function that statistically describes the state of the particles as a function of time (Boyd et al., 1995; Cercignani, 2000). The main disadvantage of the Boltzmann equation is that it can offer analytical solution only in a very limited set of simple problems. For example, the linearized Boltzmann equation is only possible in some cases where the disturbance is small enough such that the velocity distribution function is perturbed only slightly from the equilibrium or Maxwellian form (Prasanth et al., 2006). However, such cases have no real applicability in hypervelocity rarefied flow conditions (e.g., re-entry vehicles or meteoroids). The conditions arising from shock waves produced by hypervelocity meteoroids are inevitably highly non-linear with large perturbations, thus necessitating a numerical approach (see Section 7.2). Continuum equations will hold until the meteor flow field has sufficiently expanded in the wake (before the formation of the dynamically stable volume of plasma with initial radius r0). Within those spatial and temporal boundaries, the propagation of the strong cylindrical shock wave can be treated as a blast into vacuum. After that the continuum equations break down. 7.1 Analytical Approach 7.1.1 Euler's Equations of Fluid Dynamics The general equations that govern inviscid high temperature flows are called Euler equations of fluid dynamics (Anderson, 2003, 2006, 2005). The Euler equations are strictly based upon the Maxwellian velocity distribution, which is the prevailing distribution when the gas is in equilibrium. Furthermore, as they include no viscous terms, they are only valid at very low Knudsen numbers, or when the collision rate becomes quite large. When this occurs, the gas is able to redistribute its energy to accommodate varying conditions almost instantly, and the flow is practically in equilibrium everywhere. Thus, in the case of meteors, Euler's equations can only be used in the continuum flow regime (or used in a transitional flow 26 regime as an approximation, assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium in the flow of the strongly ablating meteor flow field that satisfies the continuum conditions). Euler's equations, in the case of an inviscid flow of an ideal gas, give a series of closed–form algebraic relations for the pressure and temperature ratios. Derivations of the basic continuity (total mass conservation), momentum (basically a second Newton's law) and energy (basically a total enthalpy in this case) Euler equations for an inviscid flow field are given in Anderson (2003, 2005). Their solution depends on the boundary and initial conditions for the specific flow that is considered. Here, we are just going to write those following Anderson (2006) notations: Continuity: Momentum: Energy: 𝑑𝜌 𝑑𝑡 + ∇ ∙ (𝜌𝑽) = 0 (19a), 𝜌 𝐷𝑽 𝐷𝑡 = −𝛁𝑝 𝜌 𝐷ℎ0 𝐷𝑡 = 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑡 (19b), (19c). Here, ρ and p are density and pressure, and V is velocity of the flow field (in vector form). Total enthalpy per unit mass (h0) can be expressed as ℎ0 = ℎ + 𝑣2 2⁄ . The energy equation for the inviscid flow that involves entropy (describes adiabatic flow) is not valid in this case, as entropy increases irreversibly in inviscid non- equilibrium high temperature flows. Use of the entropy term is justified in so called "equilibrium" flows which are just approximations and not especially realistic in the case of meteor flow fields. That is the reason that the entropy term has been replaced by total enthalpy in this form of meteor flow field description. Because the continuity equation is 'mechanical' in nature, it remains the same for all considerations, including chemically reacting, non-equilibrium and viscous flows. However, the energy Eq. (19c) does not hold for non-equilibrium inviscid flows, which will be briefly discussed soon. Under the conditions of the strong shock wave, let us assume that the local thermodynamic equilibrium (defined earlier) is valid behind the shock front. Then across the normal shock wave surface (as in the case of the shock front for larger meteoroids) we can obtain relations for the conservation of mass (or continuity), momentum and energy, also known as the Rankine-Hugoniot equations. These are easily derived from the Euler equations for steady, one-dimensional flow, by integrating between points in front of and behind shock. Then we can write them as follows: Continuity: Momentum: Energy: 𝜌1𝑣1 = 𝜌2𝑣2 (20a), 𝑝1 + 𝜌1𝑣1 2 = 𝑝2 + 𝜌2𝑣2 2 (20b), ℎ1 + 2 𝑣1 2 = ℎ2 + 2 𝑣2 2 (20c). The subscript 1 corresponds to the undisturbed flow ahead of the shock wave and the subscript 2 denotes the quantities in the compressed shock layer. These equations hold well for both reacting and non-reacting gases. In this case density and temperature behind the shock wave are the function of pressure and energy behind the shock front, or 𝜌2 = 𝜌(𝑝2, ℎ2) and 𝑇2 = 𝑇(𝑝2, ℎ2). For an ideal gas, for the pressure and temperature ratio behind and in front of shock wave (as a function of Mach number) we can obtain a series of closed-form relations. On the other hand, for the case of 27 non-ideal gas in a reactive flow, with strongly excited vibrational energy, the equations above must be solved numerically. Therefore, in the case of reacting flows (e.g., Brun 2009) the pressure, density and energy ratios behind and in front of a shock wave, are functions of velocity, pressure and temperature in the upstream flow: 𝑝2 𝑝1 = 𝑓1(𝑣1, 𝑝1, 𝑇1), 𝜌2 𝜌1 = 𝑓2(𝑣1, 𝑝1, 𝑇1), and ℎ2 ℎ1 = 𝑓3(𝑣1, 𝑝1, 𝑇1). The basic inviscid flow equations (19a-c) are modified in the presence of non-equilibrium chemistry or radiative heating. In the presence of non-equilibrium chemistry, Eq. (19c) has an additional term, 𝑑𝑤𝑖 𝑑𝑡 (e.g., see Anderson, 2003, 2006, 2005), which corresponds to the local rate of change of the chemical species (i) as a result of chemical reactions inside the considered volume element; this needs to be considered. This is represented by molar mass (Mi) of species (i) multiplied by its chemical rate of change ( 𝑑𝑋𝑖 𝑑𝑡 ): Therefore, the continuity equation (for specific species in the flow) is now 𝑑𝜌𝑖 𝑑𝑡 + ∇ ∙ (𝜌𝑖𝑽) = = 𝑀𝑖 𝑑𝑋𝑖 𝑑𝑡 . ; however, 𝑑𝑤𝑖 𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑤𝑖 𝑑𝑡 the general continuity equation stays the same (e.g., see Anderson, 2003, 2006, 2005). Here V is the vectoral component of the flow velocity. The energy equation (for example, in the case of volume heating by radiation absorption) includes an additional term 𝑑𝑞 𝑑𝑡 ; 𝜌 𝐷ℎ0 𝐷𝑡 = 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑡 + 𝑑𝑞 𝑑𝑡 . It should be also noted, counter-intuitively, that increasing the pressure behind the shock wave may impede the dissociation and ionization efficiency, while the temperature ratio 𝑇2 𝑇1 is higher at higher pressures. To illustrate the problem, in Figure 7 we show the temperature ratio at different atmospheric pressures and in the range of lower velocities up to 14 km/s (Anderson, 2006). However, the meteor flow field, following the formation of the shock wave, cannot simply be treated as an inviscid flow (e.g., Euler's equations of fluid dynamics). The picture is complicated if we consider the presence of high temperatures, as well as viscous and chemically reactive non-equilibrium flow (depending on the regions in the shock wave layer and the general location in the flow field). To address that, one can use the Navier-Stokes equations for the viscous flow (e.g., flow in the boundary layer). Figure 7: Influence of pressure on the normal shock temperature in equilibrium air. Credit: digitized Figure 14.3 from Anderson (2006), reproduced with permission © John Anderson, Jr. 28 At this point of discussion it is worth noting that while the Mach number is a practical tool in the evaluation of most equilibrium hypersonic flows, in the case of meteor flow fields that have high- temperature and chemically reactive flows in general, the Mach number is not a particularly useful quantity. A better approach is to treat the flow of a chemically reacting gas in terms of "primitive" variables and to use the upstream and downstream velocity, temperature, and pressure. For an assumption of equilibrium gas, the Mach number is still defined in terms of the ratio of stream velocity and the local speed of sound, and it can be used for reasonable approximations. 7.1.2 Navier-Stokes Equations The governing set of equations for a compressible viscous flow are the Navier-Stokes equations. The Navier-Stokes equations have an advantage over Euler's equations because they exhibit an extended Knudsen number validity (Josyula and Burt, 2011). While the breakdown is still subject to some debate (Boyd et al., 1995, 2003), it is generally considered that this occurs when Knudsen number is in the region of 0.1 (Bird, 1994). Beyond that, the Navier-Stokes equations fail in the meteor near wake where the ablation amplified flow field starts to rarefy. As noted, the Navier-Stokes equations are the viscous form of the Euler equations, and a common approach is to use these equations to extract similarity parameters (Taylor, 1950; Sedov, 1946). They are applicable in the boundary layer within the shock, which is characterized by frictional and conductive energy dissipation. However, these equations do not have analytical solutions. That is resolved by defining a set of boundary conditions for the viscous boundary layer. The concept of the boundary layer was first developed by Ludwig Prandtl in 1904 (Anderson, 2006). The flow outside the boundary layer is treated as inviscid. Recall that the basic flow evolution associated with the meteor cylindrical shock wave can be described by a set of Euler's equations (e.g., see Lin, 1954; Steiner and Gretler, 1994; Hutchens, 1995), which are essentially the limiting form of the general viscous flow equations in the limit of infinite Reynolds number (Anderson, 2006). Another key difference in the Navier-Stokes equations is the presence of the shear stress tensors, associated with velocity gradients. A full derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations which define the continuity, momentum and energy is given in Anderson (2003), and a detailed discussion is in Anderson (2006). It should be noted that in the general equation of motion for a fluid flow, viscous effects do not influence the basic principle of mass conservation (Anderson, 2006). Hence, as we stated earlier, the continuity equation remains the same as the Euler equation in the case of inviscid flow. Viscous interactions behind the shock front become particularly important at lower altitudes of meteor ablation, where we can differentiate: 1) Pressure interaction, caused by exceptionally thick boundary layers on surfaces under some hypersonic conditions; and 2) Shock wave/boundary-layer interaction, caused by the impingement of a strong shock wave on a boundary layer (Anderson, 2006). The thickness of boundary layer grows as the square of the free stream Mach number, and therefore hypersonic boundary layers can be orders of magnitude thicker than low-speed boundary layers at the same Reynolds number. It is well known that, because of the large-scale turbulent motion and turbulent diffusion, energy is transmitted more readily in turbulent boundary layers than in laminar. For the general case of the chemically reactive, high temperature viscous flow, the governing set of the Navier-Stokes equations can be written: Continuity: x-Momentum: 𝑑𝜌 𝑑𝑡 + 𝛁 ∙ (𝜌𝑽) = 0 (21a), 29 y-Momentum: z-Momentum: 𝜌 𝐷𝑣 𝐷𝑡 = − 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕𝜏𝑥𝑥 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕𝜏𝑦𝑥 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕𝜏𝑧𝑥 𝜕𝑧 (21b), 𝜌 𝐷𝑢 𝐷𝑡 = − 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕𝜏𝑥𝑦 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕𝜏𝑦𝑦 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕𝜏𝑧𝑦 𝜕𝑧 (21c), 𝜌 𝐷𝑤 𝐷𝑡 = − 𝜕𝑝 𝜕𝑧 + 𝜕𝜏𝑥𝑧 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕𝜏𝑦𝑧 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕𝜏𝑧𝑧 𝜕𝑧 (21d). The energy equation for hypersonic nonequilibrium and viscous high temperature flows is: 2⁄ ) 𝜌 𝐷(𝑒+𝑉2 𝐷𝑡 𝜕(𝑤𝜏𝑦𝑧) 𝜕(𝑤𝜏𝑧𝑧) + 𝜕𝑦 𝜕𝑧 = −𝛁 ∙ 𝒒 − 𝛁 ∙ 𝑝𝑽 + 𝜕(𝑢𝜏𝑥𝑥) 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕(𝑢𝜏𝑦𝑥) 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕(𝑣𝜏𝑧𝑥) 𝜕𝑧 + 𝜕(𝑣𝜏𝑥𝑦) 𝜕𝑥 + 𝜕(𝑣𝜏𝑦𝑦) 𝜕𝑦 + 𝜕(𝑣𝜏𝑧𝑦) 𝜕𝑧 + 𝜕(𝑤𝜏𝑥𝑧) 𝜕𝑥 + (21e). The full derivation of this expression is given by Anderson (2003). Here, the term 𝑒 + 𝑉2 2⁄ is the total energy per unit mass, where e denotes total internal energy and contains the heats of formation. The heat-flux is denoted by 𝛁 ∙ 𝒒, which includes radiative heat 𝒒𝑹 (Steiner and Gretler, 1994) (emitted or absorbed by the element volume). The heat flux vector is expressed as: 𝒒 = −𝒌𝛁𝑇 + ∑ 𝜌𝑖𝑼𝑖ℎ𝑖 + 𝒒𝑹 𝑖 (22), where k is thermal conductivity and the subscript i denotes the sum over different species. The term Ui is the velocity of the ith species in the flow field, and it is generally different from other species flow field velocity. We note that each real species also contribute differently to the total specific internal energy in the equation of state (Steiner and Gretler, 1994). The term V represents the velocity of all species, and terms u, v and w are components of velocity. The viscous terms (shear and normal stress terms) are in the form 𝜏𝑥𝑦 and 𝜏𝑥𝑥 (in similar fashion for other ) where μ is viscosity coefficient. The terms). The shear stress can be expressed as: 𝜏𝑥𝑦 = 𝜏𝑦𝑥 = 𝜇( + 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑦 expressions for normal stress can be written as: 𝜏𝑥𝑥 = 𝜆(𝛁 ∙ 𝑽) + 2𝜇 the bulk viscosity coefficient. 𝜕𝑣 𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑥 where 𝜆 = 2/3𝜇 and is defined as Following the exposition by Anderson (2006), we can say that in terms of the material derivative, Equation (21e) shows that the change in total energy of a fluid element moving along a streamline takes place because of: 1) thermal conduction across the surfaces of the fluid element; 2) transport of energy by diffusion into (or out of) the fluid element across its surfaces; 3) radiative energy emitted or absorbed by the element; 4) rate of work done by pressure forces exerted on the surfaces of the element; and 5) rate of work done by shear and normal stresses exerted on the surfaces. A more comprehensive discussion about the equation (including individual terms) (above) is given in Anderson (2006) and Anderson (2003, 2005). The Navier-Stokes continuity equation remains the same, as seen previously, because it is 'mechanical' in nature. In the case of a blunt body (e.g., meteoroid), the flow conditions at the outer edge of the viscous boundary layer correspond to the local thermodynamic equilibrium. For a smaller class of shock-producing meteoroids, the local thermodynamic equilibrium is only established further in the downstream flow (Berezhnoy and Borovička, 2010). Correspondingly, the boundary layer can have regions of LTE, non- equilibrium and frozen flows (Anderson, 2006). Finally, for the case of viscous and chemically reacting flow (with the presence of LTE) we can say that: 𝑝 = 𝑝(𝑒, 𝜌) and 𝑇 = 𝑇(𝑒, 𝜌). Both the Navier-Stokes and Euler's equations for the conservation of mass, momentum and energy can be written for cylindrical coordinates to accommodate an analysis of the cylindrical meteor shock waves. In the case of Euler equations, they are easily rewritten to accommodate cylindrical coordinates in unsteady one-dimensional flow (Lin, 1954; Steiner and Gretler, 1994; Hutchens, 30 1995), where only the space-coordinate (r) and time (t) are independent variables. The equations for the strong cylindrical shock wave produced by the meteor are written using the similarity assumptions developed by Sedov (1946) and Taylor (1950). Their solutions have been subsequently shown to be reasonably close to > experimentally obtained results (Bennett, 1958; Jones et al., 1968) for the strong shock regime (i.e., 𝑝2−𝑝1 𝑝1 30 ) as defined by Plooster (1970). Steiner and Gretler (1994) and Hutchens (1995) analyzed strong cylindrical blasts in cases where the source mass is not negligible and obtained improved solutions for cylindrical shock waves. 7.2 Numerical Approach A comprehensive discussion on numerical modeling of hypersonic flow is well beyond the scope of this paper, considering that this topic is extensive, well researched, and well represented in literature (e.g., see Sarma, 2000; Bertin et al., 2003; Longo et al., 2007; Gnoffo et al., 2010; McNamara et al., 2011; Boyd, 2014; Li et al., 2015; and references therein). Nevertheless, in this section we present a brief outline of numerical approaches relevant to meteors. It is important to note, however, that in re-entry problem, typical velocities are 7 – 12 km/s, much lower than that of incoming meteoroids (~11 – 72.5 km/s). Coupled with complexities surrounding the process of ablation, the modeling of meteoroid entry flow is a very challenging problem. Despite huge strides in improvement of computational power and sophisticated numerical models to-date, no model exists that can accurately describe ablation and hypervelocity flow of meteoroids at high altitudes and at all meteoroid entry velocities. This remains one of the most critical and underexplored areas of meteor shock wave research. Boyd (2000) modeled the flow field around a 1 cm diameter Leonid meteoroid moving at 72 km/s at 95 km altitude (Kn = 4, M∞ = 270). His results were roughly consistent with spectroscopic observations of the 1998 Leonid meteor shower and indicate that material properties assumed for the meteoroid play a notable role. Boyd (2000) also discussed the challenges of modeling high speed and high altitude meteoroids, and outlined complexities involved in the problem. A study by Zinn et al. (2004) considered the interaction of a fast ~500 g Leonid with the atmosphere at 91 km altitude by numerically modeling the rates of ablation and deceleration, energy deposition and terminal altitudes. They reported the effects of the shock wave, radiative expansion and chemical reactions, and their results are consistent with direct observational data. However, no other study since had embarked into the domain of modeling meteoroid flow fields at such altitudes and velocities. A choice of the numerical approach will depend on the flow regime considerations. While the Navier-Stokes equations are appropriate for describing the continuum flow, they fall short when describing the transitional and free molecular flows (e.g., Cercignani, 2000; Scanlon et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015). In particular, the breakdown of continuum becomes noticeable at approximately Kn ~ 0.1 (Oran et al., 1998), when it becomes difficult to maintain the velocity distribution when slightly perturbed from the Maxwellian distribution (e.g., Wang et al., 2003). This is because the particle nature of matter in the transitional regime (0.01 < Kn < 10) becomes extremely important and has to be explicitly accounted for. For example, once the average distance between particles is comparable to the characteristic length scale of the body, the Navier- Stokes equations can no longer produce adequate approximations to the physics of gas dynamics (e.g., Prasanth and Kakkassery, 2006). In particular, the linear transport terms for mass, viscosity, diffusion, and thermal conductivity in the partial differential equations are no longer valid (Prasanth and Kakkassery, 2006). For such problems it is necessary to implement the Boltzmann equation of kinetic energy, which can be used to consider the molecular transport phenomena across all Mach numbers and Knudsen numbers of rarefied gases, and as such it is considered the best approach to describe the hypersonic rarefied gas flows (e.g., Cercignani, 2000; Li et al., 2015). The most common application of the Boltzmann equation is in describing the conditions relevant to the problem of re-entry vehicles in the upper atmosphere, where 31 hypersonic conditions in the rarefied flow produce ionizing reactions, and subsequently a thin plasma sheath which can block communications (e.g., Boyd, 2007a, 2014; Boyd et al., 2016). Other applications are discussed in (Prasanth and Kakkassery, 2006). The direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method, first introduced by Bird (1963), is the most commonly used particle-simulation method for the Boltzmann's equation (e.g., Cercignani, 2000; Prasanth and Kakkassery, 2006; Boyd, 2007a; Scanlon et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015). DSMC is a particle method, where a large number of real gas molecules are represented by one particle. Details on the DSMC setup and modeling approach are given by Prasanth and Kakkassery (2006). The hypervelocity flow conditions (e.g., re-entry vehicles, meteoroids) also require chemical nonequilibrium models (e.g., see Boyd, 2007b; Boyd and Josyula, 2016; Hao et al., 2016). Observational data from re-entry vehicles, such as Reentry F (Carter et al., 1971), FIRE (Flight Investigation of Reentry Environment) II (Hash et al., 2007 and references therein), and RAM-C II (RAM is the Radio Attenuation Measurement) test vehicle (Jones et al., 1972), offer valuable information for validation and improvement of numerical models and are still being used today. For example, using the flight data from the RAM-C II vehicle and FIRE II capsule, Hao et al. (2016) tested two different 11-species chemical models (Gupta, 1990; Park, 1990) to examine the sensitivities of each and to find how well they describe the real flight conditions. There are still computational challenges surrounding the DSMC method. For example, Boyd (2007b) discussed challenges in representing a plasma sheath surrounding the RAM-C II flight experiment using a DSMC code for hypersonic ionized flow conditions for a reacting gas. Despite modern improvements in computer hardware, the DSMC method can be computationally expensive, depending on the nature of the problem investigated. Moreover, the DSMC method has branched out into numerous code variants, discussion of which is beyond the scope of this paper (for further discussion, see Prasanth and Kakkassery, 2006; Josyula and Burt, 2011; Li et al., 2015). A review of physico-chemical modeling in hypersonic flow simulations is given by Sarma (2000). As described earlier in this section, the Navier-Stokes equations are appropriate for the continuum flow (Kn < 0.01). The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach is suitable for describing complex flow fields, including shock-shock interaction, shock-boundary interaction and flow separation (e.g., Gnoffo et al., 2010). An example of the pressure and temperature flow field around a meteoroid 10 cm in diameter moving at 35 km/s at altitude of 80 km is shown in Figure 8 (Silber et al., 2017a). A number of CFD codes with various schemes to treat applications in hypersonic flow exist (e.g., see Hao et al., 2016, and references therein). We further direct the reader to Longo et al. (2007), Gnoffo et al. (2010) and Candler et al. (2015). A hybrid DSMC-CFD method uses a statistical DSMC method in rarefied flow conditions occurring at high altitudes, coupled with a Navier-Stokes equations solver using CFD in continuum flow conditions at lower altitudes (e.g., Wang et al., 2002; Carlson et al., 2004; Schwartzentruber et al., 2006). A discussion on the formulation of the problem and computational approach are described in Schwartzentruber and Boyd (2006). Currently there is no comprehensive code to simulate the formation of the shock wave in the rarefied flow during the onset of strong ablation that would be analogous to the CFD and DSMC numerical packages that deal with hypersonic re-entry vehicles gas dynamics both in rarefied and continuum flow regimes. 32 Figure 8: The (a) pressure and (b) temperature field around a meteoroid moving at 35 km/s at altitude of 80 km. The diameter of the meteoroid is 10 cm. This example does not include ablation. Credit: Figures 4b and 5b from Silber et al. (2017a). 8. Meteoroid Fragmentation In this section, we reflect briefly on the meteoroid fragmentation phenomena in the context of shock waves. However, due to the complexity associated with the fragmentation and the existence of significant uncertainties, the scope of our discussion is limited, as comprehensive coverage of the topic would require a separate review. Disintegration of meteoroid bodies during the hypersonic flight takes place when dynamic pressures exceed the binding strength of the meteoroid (e.g., Chul et al., 2012; Register et al., 2017; Tabetah et al., 2018). This phenomenon in generally known as meteoroid fragmentation and it takes place in the regions of material weakness. While there might be several distinct episodes of fragmentation, from a simplistic point of view, it is possible to recognize two basic fragmentations regimes: 1) continuous fragmentation (some interpretations treat this as an integral part of meteoroid ablation); and 2) sudden fragmentation (sometimes referred to as gross fragmentation or discrete fragmentation) (e.g., Ceplecha et al., 2005; Popova et al., 2008). Meteor fragmentation is a complex process that involves separation of individual fragments from the parent body under the stress of aerodynamic loading, fragment and debris cloud expansion and its spatial and temporal evolution. However, in the context of shock wave discussion, an in-depth review of the topic of fragmentation of larger meteoroids exceeds the scope of this review because of its complexity. This is mainly because the shock analysis in the frame of reference of meteor fragmentation, including the consideration of individual fragments and vapor and dust cloud, needs to account for the interaction of all objects in the system via interacting and coalescing individual shock envelopes in the flow field. 33 The fragmentation phenomena are more prevalent in larger bodies (Popova, 2011) because the cohesive strength of natural objects, such as for meteoroids, is inversely proportional to the size, and it scales down as the body size increases (e.g., Weibull, 1951; Hartmann, 1969). It should be noted that a fragmentation episode or a gross fragmentation event also corresponds to the sudden increase in the rate of energy deposition into the ambient atmosphere. Consequently, it can be clearly recognized from observations of the light curves behaviour (essentially, fragmentation corresponds to sudden peaks in light emission) (e.g., Svetsov et al., 1995). In the broader context of shock wave studies, large meteoroid fragmentation, including the special and temporal evolution of disintegrated system of different size bodies, is of great importance for study of space and near space delivery systems that undergo separation stages while at hypersonic and shock generating flows. One of the key reasons is better understanding of the interaction of shock waves by individual bodies and their effect for hydrodynamic stability of the system. Shock wave coupling and flow field interaction becomes increasingly complex when considered from the reference points of individual large fragmented bodies in both the continuum and transitional flow regimes. In recent decades, the problem of shock wave interaction from fragmented bodies has received considerable attention (Passey et al., 1980; Schultz et al., 1994; Artemieva and Shuvalov, 1996; Artemieva and Shuvalov, 2001; Barri, 2010b). It was demonstrated both experimentally and numerically that when smaller fragments are enveloped by the shock wave of the main largest fragment, smaller fragments may experience a pull toward the axis of travel of the larger body (Schultz and Sugita, 1994; Artemieva and Shuvalov, 2001; Barri, 2010b; Laurence et al., 2007; 2012). This is sometimes referred to as the collimation effect (Barri, 2010b). More recent experimental results and analytical and numerical treatment of the fragmented system demonstrate the strong effects of the size ratio between the larger primary and smaller secondary bodies on the behavior and lateral motion of the latter ones entrained in the main flow field (Laurence et al., 2007; 2012). In principle, the authors show that the larger the size of secondary smaller fragments, the more likely it is that it will be laterally displaced outside of the collective shock envelope bound flow field. It is important to emphasize that when the fragmentation produce large fragments of similar size, the primary mode of interaction of those fragments is through their shock waves (e.g., Artemieva and Shuvalov, 2001). These fragments subsequently separate further, and might undergo additional fragmentation (Melosh, 1981, 1989; Artemieva and Shuvalov, 1996; Register et al., 2017). However, the process of shock wave interactions and the resulting effects on a flow field of fragmented bodies at hypersonic velocities is a very complex topic and it still remains to be better constrained. Thus, it can be seen that the problem of simulating the dynamics of meteor fragmentation is not trivial as it needs to account for the combined contribution of individual fragments, dust and small debris, and ablated vapor to the energy deposition in the flow field (e.g., Wheeler et al., 2017). Currently, numerical simulations of meteoroid fragmentation capable of addressing the issues discussed above can be divided into three categories, mainly distinguished by the treatment of the fragment interaction and wake behavior after the breakup. This depends on whether the collective or discrete shock envelope is assumed in the model. 1. Liquid drop models. This approach treats a system of fragments, dust particles and vapor as a strengthless liquid (the approach is known as the pancake model) (Zahnle, 1992; Hills et al., 1993; Chyba et al., 1993; Crawford, 1997; Boslough et al., 1997; Shuvalov et al., 1999). The modeled body is permitted to spatially change into the "pancake" only at specific flow regime conditions. This model is useful in describing continuous fragmentation, meteoroid deformation due to the aerodynamic loading and the collective flow field that also includes the initially ablated vapor and plasma that surrounds the fragmented bodies. Subsequently, it is better suited to describe energy deposition in the atmosphere by the expanding and 34 evolving fragmenting system. A common shock envelope assumption is valid when the radius of the dust and ablated vapor cloud is less than two diameters of the initial bolide (e.g. Register et al., 2017). 2. Discrete fragment models. These models simulate separate fragments which may or may not interact via shock waves depending on the initial assumptions (e.g., Register et al., 2017). This approach considers the dynamical evolution of a finite number of larger fragments (e.g., Passey and Melosh, 1980) in which case the hydrodynamic approach is not valid (Artemieva and Shuvalov, 2001). Depending on the application, there are three discrete fragmentation models which may be implemented with the collective wake, non-collective wake, and independent wake (Register et al., 2017). This makes it necessary to apply appropriate considerations in terms of fragment interactions via shock waves. In terms of energy deposition, this model is not as efficient as the previous one, because it may not be able to account for the effective drag area generated by vapor and dust particles. The main reason is that the total cross-sectional size of the flow field that includes all fragmented bodies, dust and ablated vapor depends on the degree of assumed mutual interaction of shock waves from individual fragments. Additionally, the size and behavior of the flow field strongly depends on whether the shock envelope encompasses both primary and secondary fragments (e.g., Laurence et al., 2007; 2012) 3. Hybrid models (e.g., Register et al., 2017; Wheeler et al., 2017). These models combine the advantages of both discrete fragmentation and hydrodynamic approach to account for the flow field evolution and energy deposition by individual fragments, dust particles and ablated vapor and plasma. Essentially, hybrid models enable a more realistic reproduction of the natural fragmentation phenomenon. As shown by Register et al. (2017) and Wheeler et al. (2017), this type of hybrid fragmentation model is better suited to reproduce the energy deposition and light curves from well documented events, such as Chelyabinsk. In the context of reproducing natural events, Tabetah and Melosh (2018) implemented a two- material computer code (KFIX) to investigate the fragmentation of objects such as Chelyabinsk at aerodynamics pressures which are about two orders of magnitude lower than the compressive strength of the body. Simulating the exchange of energy and momentum between the meteoroid and the incident atmospheric air, these authors were able to identify a previously unrecognized process in which the penetration of high-pressure vapor and gas from shock layer into the body of the meteoroid enhances the deformation and facilitates the breakup of meteoroids similar to the size of Chelyabinsk. However, modeling challenges still persist in incorporating and reproducing, for instance, better constrained radiative transfer and realistic ablation rates, which remain to be addressed in more sophisticated models. In conclusion, it is important to emphasize that fragmentation of smaller meteoroids cannot be considered in the same way as fragmentation of large events. In the category of smaller meteoroids (millimeter to centimeter size range), while the initial fragmentation episode may be accompanied by the shock wave, following the separation of fragmented particles, it might not be possible to maintain the collective flow field (within the continuum flow regime) bound by the same shock envelope or even individual particle shock envelopes. This is because the fragmented particles are too small and have proportionally reduced ablation, and as such cannot maintain the continuum flow regime in their flow fields, and consequently cannot generate a shock wave in the MLT. 9. Airbursts and NEO Threat Let us now turn our attention to a larger class of extraterrestrial objects and the shock waves they produce. Asteroids and comets with a perihelion of 1.3 AU or less, thus in the near-Earth environment and capable of crossing its orbit, are collectively known as Near-Earth Objects (NEOs). The sizes of these objects exhibit a power law distribution across many orders of magnitude (Harris, 1998; Brown et al., 2013; Boslough et al., 2015a). Quantification of the distribution comes from many lines of complementary and overlapping evidence. For the smallest objects, the best constraints are from ground-based observational 35 campaigns of meteors (Halliday et al., 1996) and lunar impact monitoring (Suggs et al., 2014). Distributions of somewhat larger objects come from US government sensor data on bolides (Brown et al., 2002) and infrasound data (Silber et al., 2009). Astronomical surveys (Harris, 1998; Mainzer et al., 2011; Tricarico, 2017; Trilling et al., 2017; Stokes et al., 2017; Waszczak et al., 2017) are used for the largest objects. The size distribution is smooth and has no sharp demarcations (Figure 9). Thus, the terms we use for objects and events are somewhat arbitrary and experts in different fields do not always use the same words for the same phenomena. Up until now, this review has primarily been concerned with meteors due to objects smaller than a meter in diameter, which are defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) as "meteoroids" (IAU: www.iau.org). Figure 9: Cumulative NEO population estimate from various surveys. The numbers in brackets correspond to the following references: [1] Brown et al. (2002); [2] Boslough et al. (2015a); [3] Silber et al. (2009); [4] Stokes et al. (2017); [5] Tricarico (2017). "Chelya." in the arrow on the far left stands for Chelyabinsk. Moreover, in this review, we use the word "meteor" as defined by the IAU: "...the light and associated physical phenomena (heat, shock, ionization), which result from the high speed entry of a solid object from space into a gaseous atmosphere." Meteors brighter than magnitude -4 are also called bolides or fireballs, and those brighter than -13 are sometimes referred to as "superbolides". Large superbolides with explosive yields comparable to or greater than weapons of war have come to be known as "airbursts" and are caused by objects greater than about a meter in diameter that enter the atmosphere several times per year. This term has long been used to describe the atmospheric effects of explosive weapons, including nuclear devices. In the words of Glasstone and Dolan (1977): 'Provided the nuclear explosion takes place at an altitude where there is still an appreciable atmosphere, e.g., below about 100,000 feet, the weapon residues almost immediately incorporate material from the surrounding medium and form an intensely hot and luminous mass, roughly spherical in shape, called the "fireball." An "air burst" is defined as one in which the weapon is exploded in the air at an altitude below 100,000 feet, but at such a height that the fireball (at roughly maximum brilliance in its later stages) does not touch the surface of the earth.' 36 Small asteroids of this size disintegrate and mostly or entirely vaporize in the upper atmosphere, causing a high-altitude airburst with an explosive energy on the order of a kiloton of TNT equivalent (1 kt TNT = 4.184·1012 J). These are often meteorite-producing events (e.g., Jenniskens et al., 2012). At the other extreme, large asteroids reach the surface at hypervelocity without losing significant mass to ablation, creating an impact crater (e.g., Brown et al., 2008). Asteroids with diameters of about 20 meters can penetrate into the lower atmosphere (the lower stratosphere or troposphere), where they explode with yields on the order of a megaton (Mt) (1 Mt TNT = 4.184·1015 J). This is roughly the size threshold for NEOs that can cause destruction or casualties at the surface and contribute to the overall impact risk (e.g., Harris, 2018), as demonstrated by the Chelyabinsk event (Brown et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013). The Chelyabinsk object was ~19 m in diameter, derived from its known density and inferred mass of about 12,000 metric tons. The latter is based on the bolide's known entry velocity of ~19 km/s and estimated explosive yield of ~500 Mt (which is the same as its initial kinetic energy) (Brown et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2013). Denser, faster, or larger objects will have higher yields (with linear, square, and cube scaling, respectively). Because of the power-law size distribution of NEOs, low-altitude airbursts are far more likely hazards than crater-forming impacts and are therefore of intense interest to the planetary defense community (e.g., Mainzer, 2017; Stokes et al., 2017). This section describes the phenomena associated with the collision of NEOs with sizes between the two bounding cases: 1) complete ablation in the upper atmosphere and no significant effect at the surface, and 2) insignificant fractional mass loss or deceleration before surface impact, with most of the kinetic energy leading to explosive crater formation and associated phenomena. This range of conditions does not depend only on size, but on entry speed and angle, density, strength, and shape of the asteroid. When the conditions are right for an airburst, the asteroid moves up an exponential density gradient as it descends through the atmosphere, leading to dynamic pressures that exceed the material strength and causing it to deform and break. As it breaks up into fragments and changes shape, it continues to descend at hypervelocity into denser air, leading to a rapid increase in drag force and ablation boosted by an increase in its surface area and growing volume of high-temperature plasma. This causes a cascading feedback of mutual reinforcement and abrupt expansion of a multi-phase, turbulent mixture. Because the radiative heating and ablation of fragments surrounded by plasma can take place on a timescale that is short relative to the rate of expansion, the internal pressure can rise abruptly, boosting the explosive expansion of the mixture of air and meteoritic vapor into the low-pressure ambient atmosphere. The energy release is so rapid that it is sometimes referred to as a "detonation". This term is usually reserved for supersonic chemical explosions in which a rapid exothermic reaction reinforces and is reinforced by a shock/detonation wave. It would be a misnomer unless the process includes a self-reinforcing internal shock wave that aids in the release of energy by a means analogous to non-chemical fuel-coolant interaction explosions (e.g., Witte et al., 1970; Corradini et al., 1988). Models of the terminal phases of energy release leading to an airburst have not yet included the detailed physics of such a process. For purposes of this section, we focus less on the physics of energy release, which is modeled by others (e.g., Shuvalov et al., 2002; Wheeler et al., 2017), and more on the subsequent evolution of the explosion and its effects at the surface which are relevant to the NEO threat. Many published models ignore the actual mechanism of energy conversion because they are unable to address processes on spatial scales significantly smaller than the diameter of the asteroid. Parameterized or semi-analytical models are used to calculate the energy deposition rate along the entry path and to estimate the altitude of maximum energy deposition and how it depends on characteristics of the asteroid. The approach is similar to macroscopic, homogeneous models for chemical explosive detonation. Such models do a good job at predicting phenomena such as plate acceleration or blast generation, but ignore the small-scale physical processes of the detonation itself. To quantify the large-scale effects of a chemical detonation, we can make use of empirically-derived data on thermochemical parameters, material properties, and chemical kinetics of 37 explosives. For this purpose, we can disregard the shear heating, pore-collapse, grain-boundary interactions, and processes that we know control the detonation on spatial and time scales that are small compared to the effects of interest. The effects of airbursts on the ground can be treated with the same philosophy. Even though they should occur much more frequently than crater-forming impacts, low-altitude airbursts are rare events. Prior to the 2013 explosion over Chelyabinsk, Russia, the only witnessed case was the 1908 Tunguska airburst. For many years, Tunguska provided the only data to compare to airburst models, and on which to base the contributions of airbursts to the impact hazard. The size of the Tunguska airburst is uncertain, and estimates have varied widely. The most widely-quoted magnitude range has been between 10 and 40 Mt (Vasilyev, 1998) and were derived from the nuclear weapons effects literature, based on a combination of historic barometer data, seismograms, and forest damage assessments. Turco et al. (1982) published the highest value, about 700 Mt. The lowest estimate of 3 to 5 Mt was published by Boslough and Crawford (1997). Prior to that, the consensus had placed the yield at the low end of the range of published values – at 10 to 15 Mt – in part because of the unlikeliness of a larger event having taken place so recently. Estimates vary for the average recurrence intervals for Tunguska events. According to Brown et al. (2002), it is about once every millennium for a 10 Mt event. Boslough et al. (2015a) used revised population estimates of Harris et al. (2015) along with revised Tunguska size estimate (~4 Mt) of Boslough and Crawford (1997) to conclude that it was a 500-year event. Harris (2018) now estimates that the flux of objects this size is even lower, perhaps by a factor of two, based on the rapidly-growing catalog of small asteroids. The low-end yield estimates of Boslough and Crawford (1997) had the advantage of being the least unlikely, in terms of size, and were accepted by many researchers. Observational data that have been used to estimate the Tunguska yield include: 1) areal extent and pattern of fallen trees, 2) seismometer records, 3) barometric pressure measurements, and 4) areal extent of trees charred by thermal radiation. They are constrained by nuclear tests, laboratory experiments, and numerical models. Glasstone and Dolan (1977) derived scaling laws from the effects of nuclear weapons, providing Tunguska researchers with a means to determine the energy release required for a point-source explosion to generate observed phenomena. The pancake model was used by Chyba et al. (1993) to estimate the range of impactor size, strength, and entry speed and was consistent with a 10 to 15 Mt event. This estimate was based on the assumption that the Tunguska explosion had the same effects on the surface as a point-source explosion at the altitude of maximum energy deposition. One justification for the point-source assumption was that observations and models are both consistent with a sharply-peaked energy deposition profile that is concentrated within an atmospheric scale height (Chyba et al., 1993). However, the downward advection of the explosion was neglected. The energy deposition profile is sharply peaked due to mutually reinforcing effects of deformation and drag. This peak was called the "airburst height" (Chyba et al., 1993) and taken as the altitude at which a point source explosion of the same yield would have a similar effect on the ground. However, this assumption neglects the fact that the mass of the projectile is still traveling downward at a significant fraction of its initial speed at the time of its maximum energy loss, and can approach or come into contact with the surface. Hydrocode simulations of Boslough et al. (2008) revealed that a completely vaporized asteroid inserted at the altitude of maximum energy deposition - but still maintaining the commensurate downward momentum - continues its rapid descent to a lower effective burst altitude. Combining this result with a reexamination of the effects of topography and forest health led to the conclusion that previous analyses had overestimated the yield of the Tunguska event. Taking all these factors into account, Boslough and Crawford (2008) argued that the yield could be 5 Mt or lower (Figure 10). 38 Figure 10: CTH simulation time series showing a 5 Mt airburst originating at 12 km above the surface. The impact angle is 45°. The time steps for each frame are shown in the lower right corner (Boslough and Crawford, 2008). The full color figure is shown in the electronic version of the article. Much of our current understanding of the Tunguska event comes directly from models of the 1994 collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) with Jupiter. Jupiter has no solid surface so the only possible result of an impact is an airburst. Each of the cometary fragments descended to an altitude at which the atmospheric density was high enough that aerodynamic pressure exceeded the fragment's strength. It broke up catastrophically leading to an exponentially reinforcing feedback between the radial expansion and fragmentation, creating increasing drag and dynamic pressure. Hydrocode models showed that when they reached their altitude of maximum energy deposition, the fragments experienced stresses and strain rates of a magnitude similar to those associated with a hypervelocity crater-forming impact onto a solid. The entry wake creates a low-density, high-pressure channel from the depth of the explosion to the top of the atmosphere, leading to a highly anisotropic explosion that is directed upward and outward. Hydrocodes showed the ejection of a high-velocity plume backward along the channel (Boslough et al., 1994b, 1994a) which were observed by the Hubble Space Telescope to rise to 3,000 km above the cloud tops (Hammel et al., 1995). The observational verification of SL9 predictions lent credence to similar hydrocode models for the Tunguska airburst. For example, Tunguska simulations by Boslough and Crawford (1997) yield plumes that rise hundreds of kilometers into space, explaining the high-altitude noctilucent "bright night" clouds and suggesting that low-altitude airbursts could be a hazard to satellites in low-Earth orbit. However, more recent and detailed modeling of Jupiter impacts suggests that there is a level below which upward flow is limited and the plume is "pinched off" (Palotai et al., 2011) and that instabilities along the entry wake may stunt the formation of plumes for impacts as small as the Tunguska event (Pond et al., 2012). The case for a smaller Tunguska is not solely based on the lower effective height of burst. Boslough and Crawford (1997) also argue that yield estimates based on tree fall are too high because they do not take topography or forest health into consideration. The weapons scaling of Glasstone and Dolan (1977) apply to 39 coniferous forests on flat terrain. Many accounts of the Tunguska aftermath claim that trees were blown down over an area of 2,000 km2, but photographs reveal that many trees were left standing. Slopes greater than 15º are typical within the area of treefall, leading to concentrations of blast wave energy and wind fall extending further than would be experienced over flat terrain (Boslough and Crawford, 2008). There may also be a selection bias toward the most dramatic images of fallen trees, which tend to show ridges where blast energy is concentrated. Moreover, none of the tree-fall-based yield estimates consider the pre-impact condition of the forest. Florenskiy's (1963) description of his 1961 expedition stated that "the region of the forest flattened in 1908 was not one of homogeneous primeval intact taiga," and that "…the region of meteorite impact in 1908 was basically a fire-devastated area… a partly flattened dead and rotting forest was standing in this area…" Furthermore, "…an estimate of the force of the shock wave that is based on the number of flattened trees must necessarily take into consideration the condition of the forest at the time." Boslough and Crawford (1997) scaled the wind speeds to be consistent with Florenskiy's dynamometer measurements, finding that the necessary point-source yield is reduced to 3.5 Mt. The bright noctilucent cloud above Europe and western Asia in the nights following the Tunguska explosion may represent independent evidence for a collapsed plume, analogous to similar phenomena observed on Jupiter (Hammel et al., 1995) as described by Boslough and Crawford (1997) and supported by simulations of Artemieva et al. (2007). This view is gradually replacing a long-standing notion that the bright nights are attributable to the tail of an impacting comet (e.g., Bronshten, 2000). Boslough and Crawford (2008) ran a new set of Tunguska-scale airburst simulations in anticipation that significant impact energy is transported downward within the exploding fireball. The main motivation was to develop a qualitative understanding by exploring parameter space, leading to new models to more properly capture the physics. They varied size, impact energy, and material properties (strength and density) over a wide range of values in dozens of simulations using adaptive mesh refinement to resolve both the asteroid and the entire domain that experiences the effects of the airburst. These simulations revealed unexpected but robust phenomena that emerged as a result of a large range of realistic assumptions. Because the effects at the surface are dominated by post-airburst hydrodynamics, the simulations were simplified by adding an additional internal energy source term to initiate the explosion at a prescribed altitude. They sourced 2.0 Mt into an asteroid with 3.0 Mt of kinetic energy, in order to provide a bounding case for a 5.0 Mt airburst. The high energy density after the energy insertion causes the asteroid to vaporize immediately after completion of the artificial energy insertion, leading to instant loss of strength and explosive expansion of a fireball-like jet which maintains its downward momentum. This extreme case was intended to provide a computationally-based bound on the phenomena generated by rapid asteroid fragmentation, and ablation. One justification for a quasi-instantaneous conversion of kinetic to internal energy of a Tunguska-scale asteroid is based on simulations by Svetsov (1996) suggesting that a stony asteroid can be broken by aerodynamic force into 10 cm and smaller fragments that are quickly ablated by the high-temperature fireball in which they are immersed. The hot jet of air and asteroid vapor continues its hypersonic descent driving a downward bow shock ahead of it, which is reinforced by the explosive expansion. This generates a single wave that is simultaneously fed by both translational and radial components of kinetic energy, in contrast with descriptions in some of the Tunguska literature, in which a "ballistic wave" (the bow shock) and "explosion wave" (radial shock) are described as two distinct phenomena (e.g., Zotkin et al., 1966). Other robust phenomena that emerged are large toroidal vortices that are initiated by the rapidly descending hot jet. Ring vortices greatly reduce the aerodynamic drag on the expanding fireball, which means it can descend to a much lower altitude before stopping than if it were a rigid object. The simulations suggest that vortex formation may be a consequence of chaotic perturbations in the large-scale hydrodynamic 40 flow, implying that large-scale effects on the ground may depend on a non-deterministic fragmentation process that controls macroscopic flow. This chaotic effect would lead to statistical uncertainties in the hazard associated with low altitude airbursts. Asteroid entry and fragmentation models must therefore include the "post-burst" phase that takes into account the reduced drag on a rapidly expanding and descending fireball. In some simulations, the fireball descends to altitudes much lower than that at which the asteroid explodes, but does not reach the surface. When its rapid descent stagnates, it reaches a minimum altitude and then rises buoyantly, like a nuclear mushroom cloud. All else being equal, a larger NEO will explode at a lower altitude and its fireball will come closer to the surface, leading to stronger blast waves and more intense thermal radiation. Above some size threshold, the descending fireball will make contact with the surface and damage within the contact zone will be much more extreme due to the much higher temperatures and wind speeds within the fireball. For example, depending on the energy of the bolide, wind speeds resulting from the blast wave can attain velocities high enough to cause significant damage in the affected area (Table 1) (Glasstone and Dolan, 1977). Boslough and Crawford (2008) suggested that such a surface- contacting airburst can melt surface materials which can then quench to form glass. Such a mechanism would explain the 29-million-year-old Libyan Desert Glass, an enigmatic pure silica glass found in the western desert of Egypt. Boslough and Crawford (2008) suggested classifying airbursts as "Type 1" for the Tunguska event and "Type 2" for the putative Libyan Desert Glass event (below and above the size threshold for surface contact, respectively). Table 1: A summary and breakdown of the extent of damage resulting from an air blast (for further details, see Glasstone and Dolan, 1977; Collins available at: https://www.purdue.edu/impactearth). al., 2005; et the simulator is Asteroid-generated tsunami are also potential contributors to the overall risk. Boslough (2013) suggested that airbursts might enhance the coupling efficiency due to plume ejection and air blast though a mechanism similar to that which creates meteotsunami on Earth and the large atmospheric waves observed on Jupiter after the impact of comet fragments (Hammel et al., 1995). Preliminary modeling to test this idea is interpreted by Stokes et al. (2017) to suggest that insufficient energy is coupled from the air blast to a 41 shallow water wave to represent a significant contribution to the NEO risk. They argue that because most of the shock wave energy is reflected from the ocean surface in the short time-frame of the simulations, coupling could be neglected. However, much longer simulations over much larger domains will be required to address other suggested coupling mechanisms, including Proudman resonances with radial rarefaction waves, and momentum enhancement from plume ejection and collapse. Computational models for airbursts are useful both for gaining insight into the physics and for generating quantitative damage estimates. The emergent phenomena (e.g., ballistic plumes, downward jets, and large-scale vortices) that were discovered by the hydrocodes must be factored into impact risk assessments and can guide the search for evidence in the observational, historical, and geologic record. Parameterized and semi-analytical models can be modified to include vortex formation, buoyant forces, and surface interactions of the fireball. Air blast and radiative damage estimates can be improved across the span of possible airburst scenarios. Calculated damage maps based on hydrocode simulations can be compared to the actual data to better quantify the low-altitude airburst at Tunguska. Better risk assessments can be based on these simulations by combining damage estimates with impact probability density functions to inform policy decisions for planetary defense. Low-altitude airbursts are by far the most frequent impact events that can cause damage or human casualties on the ground. It can always be said that the next impact with such consequences on Earth will almost certainly be another low-altitude airburst. Figure 11 shows the density map as a function of wind speed for bolides delivering energy between 0.5 and 16 Mt. In comparison to a typical point source explosion for a given yield, airbursts are far more damaging, as illustrated in Figure 12. The primary purpose of airburst simulations thus far is to gain insight about the phenomenon and to develop assessment and mitigation methods of the potential threat (for a more comprehensive review, see Artemieva et al., 2016). We now have the computational tools capable of performing large ensembles of simulations of asteroid airbursts over a range of size, entry speed and angle, and burst altitude. We can generate damage maps on the ground to estimate the costs associated with infrastructure and economic losses. This capability has been used to support tabletop exercises for the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Boslough et al., 2015b) and threat exercises as part of the biannual Planetary Defense Conferences (Boslough et al., 2016). Computational fidelity of such simulations can be enhanced further by adding more physics and capability to existing hydrocodes, and by using more powerful computers and methods to extend simulations to smaller scales that resolve the cascade of fragmentation and ablation that leads to the explosion and subsequent phenomena. 42 Figure 11: Density maps (ground "footprint") showing wind speeds resulting from airbursts originating at ~12 km altitude. Entry angle for all cases is 45°, with the direction of arrival from north (top) to south (bottom of the figure). The energy delivery ranges from the highest value of 16 Mt down to 0.5 Mt, as shown in each panel. The wind speed is in m/s. Each panel is 100 km wide. Figure 12: The wind speed density (ground "footprint") distribution and area affected by a deep penetrating bolide delivering 16, 8 and 4 Mt of energy (from left to right). The shading corresponds to the three categories shown in Table 1. The air blast speed is as follows: darkest shading (brown) is > 200 m/s, medium shading (orange) is > 60 km/s and lightest shading (yellow) is >15 km/s. The upper row shows the estimates using at: https://www.purdue.edu/impactearth). The lower row shows the results from the airburst hydrocode simulations for a bolide traveling from north (top) to south (bottom of the figure). simulator available et al., source relations point (Collins 2005; the is 43 10. Detections of Meteor Generated Shock Waves Using Radar and Infrasound: A Brief Overview 10.1 Radar The contemporary set up and capabilities of modern meteor radar systems do not permit direct detection of the meteor generated shockwaves. However, it might be possible to use meteor radars to observe secondary effects that are associated with, or are indicative of meteor shock wave formation, as discussed by Rajchl (1969, 1972) and Silber et al. (2017a). In that sense, it is important to reflect briefly on the fundamentals of meteor radars. Studies of meteors with radar can be classified broadly into two extremes which employ quite different strategies. While most meteor radars use pulsed transmitters for range-resolution, they differ widely in many other features. With regard to these features, the first class are large high-power radars (referred herein as HPLA) which are commonly used to study meteoroids as they enter the radar beam (e.g., Chau et al., 2004; Westman et al., 2004; Close et al., 2007, 2008; Janches et al., 2008). These radars use high power, large collecting areas and narrow beams, and are designed to receive reflections and/or scatter from the head of the meteor (e.g., Pellinen-Wannberg, 2005; Dyrud et al., 2008) - specifically from the high-density plasma vapor cloud discussed earlier (Hocking et al., 2016a). Numerical and theoretical studies have been performed to simulate the signal received (e.g., Räbinä et al., 2016; Marshall et al., 2017; Dyrud and Janches, 2008). However, few such studies have looked at the impact of shock fronts on the radio-waves, and there is considerable extra work to be done in this area. Recently, the possible relation between the termination of meteor head echoes, detected by HPLA (High-Power, Large-Aperture) radars, and the onset of meteor generated shock waves has been discussed by Silber et al. (2017b). However, further theoretical work and experimental validation is required to confirm the initial conclusions of that theoretical reasoning. The second extreme class of meteor radar does not use high power or narrow beams. Nor do such radars receive signal reflected primarily from the meteoroid head, but rather from the entire ionized meteor trail left behind by the meteoroid. These radars rely on quite broad beams - often almost isotropic. They generally operate at VHF frequencies, typically in the range 15 to 50 MHz, whereas the HPLA class often use frequencies of hundreds of MHz and more. This means the HPLA may have wider bandwidths and hence better resolution, often approaching a few tens of meter, in contrast to range resolutions of typically 2-3 km with the radars being now discussed (Hocking et al., 2016a). We will refer to this second class of radars as IMR, for Interferometric Meteor Radar (with reasoning to be established shortly) (also see Hocking et al. 2001; Holdsworth et al., 2004; Mathews, 2004; Malhotra et al., 2007; Janches et al., 2014). The meteor trails require special alignment in order to be detected by IMR, since they rely on so- called "specular reflection" in order to be detected. This means that the spatial orientation of the trail axis (the vector along the direction of meteoroid propagation path) needs to be perpendicular to the vector from the radar to the trail. However, because scatter occurs along the entire length of the trail, and because of the choice of frequencies, the trail offers a large cross-section for the radar, and these types of radars detect far more meteors than most narrow-beam systems (Hocking et al., 2016a). IMR Systems exist which are capable of detecting 30,000 meteors per day at modest power, such as 10-30 kW peak power (e.g., Fritts et al., 2012). This compares to typically Megawatts of peak power for the largest HPLA discussed above. However, these smaller radars cannot be used in monostatic mode. Because of the large cross- sections of the meteor trail, they can detect to magnitudes far weaker than the larger radars and this causes issues in location. A huge fraction of meteors are detected through sidelobes of the radar beams, as was the case with the Poker Flat Meteor radar (Avery et al., 1983), especially if the main beam points nearly vertically (since meteors are optimally detected at angles of 30 to 60 degrees from azimuth, which coincides with the location of many sidelobes in a system like Poker Flat). In order to compensate for this, it is generally mandatory to receive on multiple receiver antennas and use phase-interferometry between receiver antennas to locate the direction of the received signal (hence leading to the suggestion of IMR for classifying 44 these radars). Radar pulsing is used to determine range, as is normal for all pulsed systems. Detection rates can be further enhanced through pulse-coding techniques. IMR radars are commonly used to determine winds and temperatures in the mesopause region, apart from their ability to teach us about meteors (e.g., Tsutsumi et al., 1994; Singer et al., 2003; Pancheva et al., 2004; Franke et al., 2005; Buriti et al., 2008; also see Hocking et al., 2016a, section 11.3). A suitably designed IMR system can achieve angular accuracies of 1-2 degrees and altitude accuracies of 2-3 km. Examples of such radars are shown, and the most common details of operation are discussed in Hocking et al. (2001) and also Hocking et al. (2016a), section 11.3. The receivers are not widely spaced - typically they can be enclosed in a square of width 5 radar wavelengths. However, even when using interferometry, some caution is required. It is easy to detect weak meteors which have sufficient phase-noise that it prohibits accurate echo location. If a height accuracy of worse than 4 km is produced, the data-point should really be discarded for many applications. Often more than half of the meteors that can be detected should be eliminated for such resolution reasons. Each meteor measurement should have some form of error determination as part of the interferometric processing. However, it is not uncommon for operators of such radars to solely use count-rates as an indicator of system capability. This can be very misleading - a system detecting say 30,000 meteors per day, but accepting all meteors can appear much more effective than one which detects only 15,000 meteors per day but uses high quality error-checking, yet the latter may well be the more effective system. Suitability often depends on the type of data required. While we have distinguished HPLA and IMR, there are some systems which employ some aspects of each radar-type. The SAAMER and DRAAMER systems (Fritts et al., 2012) use an interesting combination with 8 distinct beams, combined with interferometry, which allows them to detect at least a few head-echoes daily, as well as perform traditional IMR studies. At times special echoes called "non-specular" echoes are detected by IMR radars, where the scattering seems to be due to plasma instabilities and not specular reflections. These are often seen close to regions of magnetic field lines aligned perpendicular to the radar/scattering-region vector. The scatter is not due to shock fronts and we will not pursue these further here. IMR usually concentrate on so-called "underdense" meteors. These are defined to be meteor trails with line densities under 2.4·1014 electrons per meter of trail length (e.g., McKinley, 1961; Poulter et al., 1977, 1978; Silber et al., 2017a). Overdense meteors have line densities in excess of 1016 m-1 (Poulter and Baggaley, 1977, 1978; Jones et al., 1990). Meteor trails with intermediate lines densities are referred to as "transitional". The choice of a line density of 2.4·1014 m-1 ensures that most radio VHF waves can penetrate through the trail if the line density is below this value. Appendix C of Hocking et al. (2016b) discusses the parameters needed for trail penetration. If the trail is underdense, radio-waves may penetrate the trail and are scattered from electrons throughout the trail. As the trail diffuses outward and widens to a value of the order of half a radar wavelength, radio-wave interference across the trail causes the signal to decrease exponentially with time, so the backscattered signal decays exponentially, dying out in a few tenths of a second. The majority of meteors have this character, and are used for atmospheric wind and temperature determinations (e.g., see Liller et al., 1954; Cervera et al., 2000; Cevolani et al., 2003; Meek et al., 2013). However, such meteor trails are generally created by quite small meteoroids, and so are unlikely to generate shocks. With regard to this paper, it is the meteors that generate shocks that are of most interest. Transitionally dense and overdense meteors are more likely to generate shocks than uderdense meteors, although there is still uncertainty regarding the specific regime in which shocks are expected to occur, as discussed earlier. In principle, shockwave generating meteors detected by meteor radar are primarily of strong transitional or overdense nature (Hocking et al., 2016b). These more dense trails start their lives as trails with peak electron densities higher than the plasma frequency for most IMRs. The radio reflection from 45 the trail is very strong, like that of a radar signal reflecting from a solid metal cylinder. As time goes by, they spread and weaken, eventually achieving electron densities with plasma frequencies below the radar frequency. At that time they become partially reflecting, but if their width is already wider than typically half a wavelength, the backscattered signals from different parts of the trail destructively interfere and the signal immediately dies out. Lifetimes of these overdense trails can be several seconds, but most IMRs have software-defined limits on the lifetimes of typically 2-4 seconds, to avoid allowing non-meteor signals to be accepted. A detailed study of the portion of these stronger meteors which could be detected by a typical IMR was presented by Hocking et al. (2016b), appendix C. However, based on likely lifetimes, and to a lesser extent the likelihood that the received signal might saturate typical receivers, it was concluded that even the strongest meteors detected by IMR are probably upper-level transitional meteors, and generally not truly overdense meteors. Possible applications of IMRs to studies of shock fronts are still under investigation. Most potential applications will be statistical in nature: in contrast to HPLAs, it is unlikely that studies of any individual meteor event will reveal much. Nevertheless, some useful studies have been made. One such example is Hocking et al. (2016b). In this paper, the complementary cumulative number of meteors was plotted as a function of decay time, and the behavior at the large-decay time end (decay times of a second or so) were examined and compared to ozone densities at multiple sites, both for night-time and daytime conditions. The paper presented convincing evidence that ozone plays a key role in hastening the rate of decay of meteor trails. The explanation requires the existence of shock waves. Some key points from the paper include not only the role of ozone in the plasma trail decay, but the need for care and consistency in analysis. Every meteor radar a uses slightly different way of identifying meteors. Some require an exponential decay, others require only that the signal decays with time. The former method would miss many of the non-underdense meteors, since their decay is not usually exponential - rather, it holds steady for a while and then drops off relatively rapidly as the trail expands and becomes transparent (see above). So it is important that the same radars and software are used for comparisons between sites. In this case all the radars were SKiYMET radars (Hocking et al., 2001). That paper also demonstrated another important point. It is not uncommon in searching for mechanisms that authors need to decide between different processes. For example, is the process due to diffusion or chemistry? The important, but simple point that emerges from this paper is that the mechanisms do not need be singular. In this case, three mechanisms were involved - shocks, diffusion and chemistry all contributing some aspects. Furthermore, ozone had to diffuse in from the surrounding atmosphere, once the shock-front had passed. All ozone-related chemistry took place on the edge of the meteor trail. As discussed in Silber et al. (2017a), the presence of short duration hyperthermal chemistry on the boundaries of postadiabatically expanding meteor train is indicative of the prior occurrence of the relatively strong cylindrical shock waves. This thermally driven chemistry between the shock modified ambient atmosphere and meteor metallic ions on the boundary of high temperature meteor train, that very rapidly removes electrons, could potentially be detected by meteor radar (Silber et al., 2017a). Further work like this with both HPLA and IMR will be important in further understanding the complex physical processes involved in the meteor trail formation, especially with regard to the early stages of trail formation and the complex physics and chemistry that take place around the meteor head and early shock-fronts. 10.2 Infrasound In preceding sections we discussed the shock waves produced by hypervelocity meteoroids during their passage through the atmosphere. Here, we will give a brief overview of a byproduct resulting from strong shock decay over a distance – a very low frequency acoustic (or infrasound) wave. Since infrasound is 46 a manifestation of shock waves, it can be used to estimate energy released by meteoroids (e.g., Silber et al., 2009, 2011; Brown et al., 2013), and in some cases other parameters, such as the altitude of the shock (Silber et al., 2014), which is relevant for establishing flow regimes (Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018) and testing and validation of shock propagation models (e.g., Silber et al., 2015; Nemec et al., 2017). A detailed overview of infrasound from meteors can be found in ReVelle (1974), Edwards (2010), ReVelle (2010), Silber (2014), and Silber and Brown (2019). Infrasound is acoustic energy generally considered to be in the frequency range of 0.01 Hz to ~20 Hz, below the low-end of human hearing. The combined effect of atmospheric spreading and absorption losses (e.g., Sutherland et al., 2004) is proportional to the square of the airwave frequency (f2), so that losses are least in the lower frequencies; thus, infrasound can propagate over very long distances with little attenuation. Meteors, volcanoes and earthquakes are examples of natural sources, while explosions and mining activity are common (but not the only) sources of anthropogenic infrasound sources. Infrasound data, recorded typically as pressure-time series or waveforms, are generally recorded by arrays of four or more low frequency microphones placed in a regular planar arrangement on the ground surface. The analog data are sampled and digitized at 20 samples per second, or higher, and stored. Standard array processing techniques are used to process the data to determine the direction of arrival (back azimuth) of coherent plane waves moving across the array. Processing also gives the apparent horizontal velocity across the array, known as the trace velocity as well as some measure of coherence or correlation of the signal energy (e.g., Christie et al., 2010). The speed of sound (c) in the atmosphere is a function of temperature (T) and is expressed as: c = (γRT)1/2, where R is the specific gas constant. Thus, thermal structure of the atmosphere plays an instrumental role in long range acoustic propagation. The dynamic variability of the atmosphere occurs on timescales of airwave propagation, which might irreversibly affect the signal by the time it reaches the receiver (e.g. by refraction, ducting and reflection) (de Groot-Hedlin et al., 2010). This presents challenges in source geolocation and characterization (e.g., Silber and Brown, 2014). For example, the atmospheric winds can reach a reasonable fraction of the sound speed and thus affect the observed pressure amplitudes, as well as bias the measured back azimuths (e.g., Donn et al., 1971; de Groot-Hedlin et al., 2010; Mutschlecner et al., 2010). Moreover, the seasonal winds in the upper stratosphere (at ~ 50 km altitude) can create a favorable propagation duct when the energy is moving in the directions of those winds (e.g., Tolstoy, 1973; Georges et al., 1977; Drob et al., 2003; Kulichkov, 2010). Because meteoroids can produce shock waves at any altitude up to ~ 100 km and in rare cases even higher (depending on the parameters described in preceding sections, such as Kn) (Zinn et al., 2004; Brown et al., 2007; Silber and Brown, 2014), the resulting infrasound signals may take multiple paths through the atmosphere, and even reach altitudes of 120 km before being refracted back to the surface. Thus, the full atmospheric state from the ground to those altitudes is needed for source characterization, although this in itself is a challenging task (e.g., see de Groot-Hedlin et al., 2010). Meteoroid infrasound production occurs in three ways (Ceplecha et al., 1998): 1) when a strong shock wave formed during the meteoroid's hypervelocity passage through the atmosphere decays into an acoustic signature (sonic boom); 2) when the meteoroid fragments with an explosive release of energy during the atmospheric flight (e.g., ReVelle, 1976; Silber et al., 2011, 2015 and references therein; Brown et al., 2013); and 3) as a result of a surface impact (e.g., Brown et al., 2008). In case 1), the meteoroid moves so fast that the Mach cone can be approximated as a cylinder and thus the object acts a as cylindrical line source (Tsikulin, 1970). In case 2), gross fragmentation can be considered as a point source explosion, or quasi- spherical source (e.g., ReVelle, 1976; 2005). The situation can be further complicated with multiple fragmentation episodes, or where both cylindrical and spherical shocks might occur simultaneously. To conform to the general theme of this review paper, the discussion in this section is mainly focused on cylindrical shock waves. A primer on shock wave theory relevant to meteor infrasound is given by Silber (2014). 47 The first recorded infrasound signal by a terrestrial body is from the Tunguska event (Whipple, 1930). However, it was not until the Cold War era that infrasound gained popularity as a passive and relatively inexpensive tool in detecting large explosions in the atmosphere. The United States Air Force Technical Applications Centre (AFTAC) operated a global network of infrasound arrays optimized to detect large explosions (e.g., Revelle, 1997; Silber et al., 2009). Although not immediately recognized, some of the explosive sources recorded between 1960 and 1974 by infrasound instruments were produced by large bolides (Shoemaker et al., 1967). Recently digitized and re-analyzed (Silber et al., 2009), this historical data set provides valuable information about the flux of objects meters to 10s of meters in size (also see Figure 9), especially since it covers the time period when observations of extraterrestrial objects were scarce. Currently, the infrasound component of the International Monitoring System (IMS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), provides global monitoring for illicit explosions (Christie and Campus, 2010) and contributes to the growing body of infrasound data from other sources, including meteors. Infrasound from larger events (many kilotons of energy release) may be detected at multiple arrays over thousands of kilometers. Notable examples are the 2009 daylight bolide over Indonesia (Silber et al., 2011) and more recently, a spectacular fireball over Chelyabinsk (e.g., Brown et al., 2013). Energy released by a meteor is of great interest to scientific community, as it is one of the most crucial parameters in constraining the NEO flux and NEO hazard. Source yield can be estimated by analyzing the measured signal attributes, such as the airwave period and/or amplitude observed at an array. There exist a number of empirical relations relating signal amplitude to energy release; however, the most robust estimate is given by empirical period-yield relations, originally developed for nuclear explosions (ReVelle, 1997). A compilation of various empirical energy relations is given in Silber and Brown (2018). A particular infrasound signal that was commonly observed from large explosions is the Lamb edge- wave or fundamental atmospheric mode (e.g., ReVelle, 2008, 2010 and references therein). This is a horizontally propagating wave along the surface that suffers little attenuation and decays exponentially with height. It would be observed as a long period wave arriving with the surface sound speed, and should be quite prominent. The Lamb waves approach presented by Pierce and Posey (1971) (also see ReVelle et al., 1996) can also be used to estimate explosive source yield. While the Lamb waves were commonly observed in large nuclear explosions, small bolides would not be likely candidates for such waves. ReVelle (2008) developed a Lamb wave prediction model which he then used on four large bolides, including the Tunguska and the Revelstoke events. The latter is one of the large bolides from the historical dataset (e.g., Silber et al., 2009). He also discussed the uncertainties associated with determination of the Lamb wave source, as its manifestation alone might not be indicative of the bolide entry (for further details, see ReVelle, 2008). For further discussion on the Lamb waves and conditions under which they are likely to form, see ReVelle (2010). Both analytical and numerical approaches have been developed in an attempt to predict an infrasonic signature pattern at the receiver. Drawing upon early works on cylindrical line source related to lightning (e.g., Jones et al., 1968; Few, 1969), exploding wires (i.e., Sakurai, 1964; Plooster, 1970) and meteors, ReVelle (1974) formulated an analytical blast wave (or weak shock) model for meteors. According to this model, the initially formed strong shock generated by the meteoroid decays to weak shock of the N-wave (a typical sonic boom signature that resembles the letter N) at some radial distance, assumed to correspond to 10R0, where R0 is the blast or relaxation radius. As mentioned in Section 6, there are several expressions for R0. Although these are fundamentally the same, they differ by some proportionality constant. The list of various expressions can be found in Silber (2014). At 10R0, the fundamental signal period (τ0) can be related to R0 via: τ0 = 2.81(R0/c0), where c0 is the local ambient speed of sound. This means that meteoroids depositing large amounts of energy will also have large blast radii and consequently a long fundamental 48 period of the wave. Since the frequency is inversely proportional to the period, the larger the event, the lower the frequency, and thus the longer the propagation distance of the resulting infrasonic wave. Before reaching the receiver, the weak shock can 1) continue to propagate in the form of weak shock; or 2) transition into a linear wave at some "distortion" distance. In either case, for the ReVelle's (1974) weak shock model for meteors to be valid, certain approximations have to be made, such as that no fragmentation occurs and ablation is negligible (i.e., non-fragmenting, single body meteoroid). Another condition is that all arrivals must be direct, meaning that infrasound signal cannot reflect or refract between the source and the receiver (distance < 300 km). Using simultaneous optical and infrasound observations of centimeter sized meteoroids detected over a period of several years, Silber and Brown (2014) developed an approach to determine the shock source height and type of shock (cylindrical or quasi-spherical). This high fidelity data set was later used by Silber et al. (2015) to test and validate ReVelle's (1974) weak shock model. The derivation and full treatment of ReVelle's (1974) weak shock approach are outlined in Silber (2014), and Silber and Brown (2019). While ReVelle's (1974) analytical treatment offers a good first-order approximation for direct arrivals, it suffers from inherent limitations (e.g., no ablation and no fragmentation). The next natural step forward is a numerical approach, although a full treatment for meteor generated shock waves (with ablation) at all altitudes and across all meteoroid velocities is still lacking. A very limited number of studies have been done in the domain of meteor generated infrasound. Aircraft sonic boom theory (e.g., Whitham, 1974; Maglieri et al., 2014) has been recently applied to meteor shocks. The crater forming impact over Carancas, Peru (e.g., Brown et al., 2008) sparked great interest in modeling meteor generated infrasound. Although the detailed meteoroid entry parameters necessary for high fidelity validation and model testing are not known in great detail, this event has been used as a test case in numerous modeling studies (e.g., Haynes et al., 2013; Henneton et al., 2015; Gainville et al., 2017). More recently, Nemec et al. (2017) applied aircraft sonic boom theory to four well constrained meteor events from Silber et al. (2015). Johnston et al. (2018) developed a coupled radiation and ablation model to describe the aerothermodynamic environment of atmospheric entry for large meteoroids (1 – 100 m) moving at velocities from 14 to 20 km/s at altitudes of 20 – 50 km. Although all these studies yield promising results, much more work is needed in this domain. Future studies should aim to extend the model capabilities to higher velocities and altitude, with the inclusion of ablation treatment. 11. Summary and Conclusions Shock waves are generated by almost all strongly ablating and sufficiently large meteoroids that enter denser regions of the Earth's atmosphere and reach the lower transitional flow regime as defined by the Knudsen number (provided that these meteoroids retain sufficient mass and velocity close to that of the initial pre-atmospheric velocity). Moreover, based on the mass law, the overall number of meteoroids capable of shock formation is only a fraction of the overall meteor influx. However, the problem of explaining meteor generated shock waves is more complex and differs from analogous shock waves produced by much larger and weakly ablating hypersonic re-entry vehicles. The main reason for such difference is the much higher propagation velocity of an average meteoroid and the presence of ablation induced hydrodynamic shielding that alters the flow regime and pushes the continuum flow further up in altitude relative to the actual meteoroid dimensions. While the shock in front of the meteoroid dissociates, excites and ionizes the volume of the initially swept atmosphere, the presence of high kinetic temperatures behind the shock front, coupled with strong ablation, provides the background conditions for generation of meteor generated cylindrical shock waves as if they were formed by an explosive line source. The strength of those cylindrical shock waves is also a direct function of the energy deposition by the ablating meteoroid per unit path length. 49 Analytical and numerical approach in the rarefied flow is difficult, and more so in the case of strong ablation. Some fundamentals of the Eulerian and Navier-Stokes equations have been discussed, along with an overview of the current numerical methods dealing with the rarefied flow. However, currently there is no comprehensive numerical model that can account for the shock generating meteor flow fields when strong ablation in the regime corresponding to a high Knudsen number is present. Deep penetrating meteoroids can produce airbursts, which can have destructive consequences at the ground, even if a physical object does not make a touchdown. Considering that only a couple of such events have been documented, much of our knowledge comes from numerical studies. Numerical modeling is also the key in evaluating planetary threats from NEOs. The direct detection of meteor generated shockwaves in the upper atmosphere is difficult because of the bright luminous phenomenon that accompanies the shock passage and the rapid shock attenuation. In that respect, we have reviewed some basics of meteor radar science and infrasound. The radar methodology is capable of detecting the indirect effects of meteor generated shock waves that are materialized through the presence of short lasting hyperthermal chemical reactions and subsequent rapid initial electron removal from boundaries of diffusing meteor train. The infrasonic methodology can be used to determine energy deposition by a meteoroid, and in some circumstances, the shock source height above the Earth's surface. Both methodologies may be promising for improved meteor shock wave detection and observation. We conclude by proposing that meteor science is not a science in decline. That is evident as there are still unanswered questions, especially in the area of meteor shock waves. Thus, much more work remains to be done. Some of the questions that remain to be answered are: 1. Resolving the altitudes where cm-sized meteoroids generate shock waves as a function of velocity, size and composition (Moreno-Ibáñez et al., 2018). 2. Understanding the physico-chemical aspects of meteor shock wave phenomena in the near and far field ambient atmosphere around the meteor and its physico-chemical impact on the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) (e.g., Vadas et al., 2014; Silber et al., 2017a). 3. Possible methods for meteor shock wave detection at the altitudes where they form (e.g., Silber et al., 2017b). 4. Understanding the risks and further constraining the lower boundary of sizes, compositions and velocities of large objects that create shock waves in the lower atmosphere and represent a potential hazard (Mironov et al., 2015). 5. Understanding the hazards of meteor generated shock waves and their effects in MLT to future frequent space travel (Mironov and Murtazov, 2015). Acknowledgements The authors thank the Editors of ASR for inviting this review paper, and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to improve this paper. EAS gratefully acknowledges useful discussions with Reynold E. Silber. EAS also acknowledges the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postdoctoral Fellowship program for supporting this project. MG acknowledges support from the ERC Advanced Grant No. 320773, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nos. 16-05-00004, 16- 07-01072, and 18-08-00074. Research at the Ural Federal University is supported by the Act 211 of the Government of the Russian Federation, agreement No 02.A03.21.0006. 50 List of variables (Sections 2 – 6) the number of vaporizing meteoric accommodation coefficient the dimensionless shape factor for a specific meteoroid shape speed of sound specific heat of the meteoroid drag coefficient diameter, blunt object diameter, meteoroid energy energy, ablated vapor altitude Boltzmann constant Knudsen number Knudsen number within vapor cap mass, meteoroid a As c C CD d dm E Evapor h k Kn Knv m M∞ Mach number ma mm Msw Mach number, shock wave Nv molecules/atoms p p' p0 p1 p2 Q R0 r0 Re rm S T T' pressure, shock pressure behind compression shock pressure, ambient atmosphere pressure, free stream pressure, shock latent heat of vaporization blast (or characteristic) radius radius, initially formed meteor trail Reynolds number radius, meteoroid projected cross-sectional area temperature temperature behind compression shock mass, air molecule mass, meteoric molecule/atom T0 Tm Ts t v 𝑣𝑣 temperature, ambient air mean temperature, meteoroid temperature, meteoroid surface time meteoroid velocity (or velocity of the air stream over the meteoroid) mean velocity of the reflected/evaporated atoms and molecules from the meteoroid surface, and ahead of the shock wave volume, meteoroid volume, upstream flow volume, shock flow velocity, free stream flow velocity, shock Vm V1 V2 v1 v2 vparticles velocity, vapor cloud molecules x distance traveled by a blunt body γ specific heat ratio δ shock detachment distance ε emissivity of the meteoroid Λ heat transfer coefficient (heat of ablation of the meteoroid material) μ dynamic viscosity coefficient ρ density density behind compression shockρ0 ρ' density, ambient atmosphere density, free stream density, shock density, air density, meteoroid ablation coefficient Stefan-Boltzmann constant characteristic time, chemical reactions characteristic time, for a fluid element to travel the distance of the flow field Mach cone angle ρ1 ρ2 ρa ρm σa σSB τc τf Φ 51 List of variables (Section 7) enthalpy per unit mass total enthalpy per unit mass enthalpy per unit mass, undisturbed flow enthalpy per unit mass, shock thermal conductivity molar mass of species (i) pressure pressure, undisturbed flow pressure, shock layer radiative heat temperature temperature, undisturbed flow T2 temperature, shock layer u, v, w components of velocity V Ui V v1 v2 λ μ ρ ρ1 ρ2 velocity of the ith species in the flow field velocity (vector form), flow field velocity, undisturbed flow velocity, shock layer bulk viscosity coefficient dynamic viscosity coefficient density density in undisturbed flow density, shock layer h h0 h1 h2 k Mi p p1 p2 qR T T1 References: Anderson, J.D. Nongray Radiative Transfer Effects on the Radiating Stagnation Region Shock Layer and Stagnation Point Heat Transfer. U.S. Naval Ordnance Lab, White Oak, MD, pp. 89, 1967. Anderson, J.D. An engineering survey of radiating shock layers. AIAA Journal 7, 1665-75, 1969. Anderson, J.D. Modern compressible flow: with historical perspective. 3 ed. McGraw-Hill New York, NY, 2003. Anderson, J.D. Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics. 2 ed. AIAA, Reston, VA, 2006. Anderson, J.D., Jr. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. 4 ed. McGraw–Hill, New York, NY, 2005. Artemieva, N., Shuvalov, V. 3D effects of Tunguska event on the ground and in atmosphere. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. League City, Texas, pp. 1537, 2007. Artemieva, N.A., Shuvalov, V.V. Interaction of shock waves during the passage of a disrupted meteoroid through the atmosphere. Shock waves 5, 359-67, 1996. Artemieva, N.A., Shuvalov, V.V. Motion of a fragmented meteoroid through the planetary atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 106, 3297-309, 2001. Artemieva, N.A., Shuvalov, V.V. From Tunguska to Chelyabinsk via Jupiter. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 44, 37-56, 2016. Avery, S.K., Riddle, A.C., Balsley, B.B. The Poker Flat, Alaska, MST radar as a meteor radar. Radio Science 18, 1021-7, 1983. Baggaley, W. The de-ionizatton of dense meteor trains. Planetary and Space Science 26, 979-81, 1978. Baggaley, W. The interpretation of overdense radio meteor echo duration characteristics. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia 30, 184-9, 1979. Baggaley, W. Meteors and atmospheres. Symposium-International Astronomical Union. Cambridge Univ Press, pp. 85-100, 1980. Baggaley, W.J. Radar observations. Meteors in the Earth's Atmosphere: Meteoroids and Cosmic Dust and Their Interactions with the Earth's Upper Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, 123-47, 2002. Baldwin, B., Sheaffer, Y. Ablation and breakup of large meteoroids during atmospheric entry. Journal of Geophysical Research 76, 4653-68, 1971. 52 Barri, N. Movement, Ablation and Fragmentation of Meteoroid in the Atmosphere. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 17, 1-23, 2010a. Barri, N.G. Meteoroid fragments dynamics: Collimation effect. Solar System Research 44, 55-9, 2010b. Bauer, E. Physics of high temperature air I, II. Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1772, 1990. Beckwith, I.E. Development of a High Reynolds Number Quiet Tunnel for Transition Research. AIAA Journal 13, 300-6, 1975. Beech, M. Meteor astronomy: a mature science? Earth, Moon, and Planets 43, 187-94, 1988. Ben-Dor, G., Igra, O., Elperin, T. Handbook of Shock Waves, Three Volume Set. Academic Press, 2000. Bennett, F.D. Cylindrical shock waves from exploding wires. The Physics of Fluids 1, 347-52, 1958. Berezhnoy, A.A., Borovička, J. Formation of molecules in bright meteors. Icarus 210, 150-7, 2010. Bershader, D. Some Remarks on Electric-Discharge Shock-Tube Diagnostics. Reviews of Modern Physics 32, 780-4, 1960. Bertin, J.J., Cummings, R.M. Fifty years of hypersonics: where we've been, where we're going. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 39, 511-36, 2003. Bird, G.A. Approach to Translational Equilibrium in a Rigid Sphere Gas. The Physics of Fluids 6, 1518-9, 1963. Bird, G.A. Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. 2 ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994. Boltzmann, L. Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen. Wiener Berichte 66, 675-370, 1872. Bones, D.L., Gómez Martín, J.C., Empson, C.J., et al. A novel instrument to measure differential ablation of meteorite samples and proxies: The Meteoric Ablation Simulator (MASI). Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 094504, 2016. Borovička, J. Two components in meteor spectra. Planetary and Space Science 42, 145-50, 1994. Borovička, J., Popova, O., Golub, A., Kosarev, I., Nemtchinov, I. Bolides produced by impacts of large meteoroids into the Earth's atmosphere: comparison of theory with observations. II. Benesov bolide spectra. Astronomy and Astrophysics 337, 591-602, 1998. Borovička, J., Weber, M., Bocek, J. Temporal evolution of a Perseid fireball spectrum. WGN, Journal of the International Meteor Organization 34, 49-54, 2006. Bose, T.K. High Temperature Gas Dynamics: An Introduction for Physicists and Engineers. 2 ed. Springer International Publishing, New York, NY, 2014. Boslough, M., Brown, P., Harris, A. Updated population and risk assessment for airbursts from near-earth objects (NEOs). 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference. pp. 1-12, 2015a. Boslough, M., Chodas, P., Ezzedine, S., Jennings, B., Fogleman, B. Physical and infrastructure modeling for the 2015 PDC asteroid threat exercise. 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference. pp. 1-18, 2016. Boslough, M., Jennings, B., Carvey, B., Fogleman, W. FEMA Asteroid Impact Tabletop Exercise Simulations. Procedia Engineering 103, 43-51, 2015b. Boslough, M.B., Chael, E.P., Trucano, T.G., Crawford, D.A. Axial focusing of energy from a hypervelocity impact on earth. International Journal of Impact Engineering 17, 99-108, 1995. Boslough, M.B., Crawford, D.A., Robinson, A.C., Trucano, T.G. Mass and penetration depth of Shoemaker-Levy 9 fragments from time-resolved photometry. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 1555-8, 1994a. Boslough, M.B., Crawford, D.A., Robinson, A.C., Trucano, T.G. Watching for fireballs on Jupiter. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 75, 305-10, 1994b. Boslough, M.B.E. Tsunami from Plume-Forming Collisional Airbursts. Planetary Defense Conference. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States), Flagstaff, AZ, 2013. Boslough, M.B.E., Crawford, D.A. Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Plume-forming Collisions on Earth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 822, 236-82, 1997. 53 Boslough, M.B.E., Crawford, D.A. Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. International Journal of Impact Engineering 35, 1441-8, 2008. Bouquet, A., Baratoux, D., Vaubaillon, J., et al. Simulation of the capabilities of an orbiter for monitoring the entry of interplanetary matter into the terrestrial atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science 103, 238-49, 2014. Boyd, I. Modeling of plasma formation in rarefied hypersonic entry flows. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. pp. 206, 2007a. Boyd, I.D. Computation of atmospheric entry flow about a Leonid meteoroid. Leonid Storm Research. Springer, 93-108, 2000. Boyd, I.D. Predicting breakdown of the continuum equations under rarefied flow conditions. AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, pp. 899-906, 2003. Boyd, I.D. Modeling of associative ionization reactions in hypersonic rarefied flows. Physics of Fluids 19, 096102, 2007b. Boyd, I.D. Computation of Hypersonic Flows Using the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Method. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 52, 38-53, 2014. Boyd, I.D., Candler, G.V., Levin, D.A. Dissociation modeling in low density hypersonic flows of air. Physics of Fluids (1994-present) 7, 1757-63, 1995. Boyd, I.D., Josyula, E. Resolution of the vibrational energy distribution function using a direct simulation Monte Carlo-master equation approach. Physics of Fluids 28, 016102, 2016. Bronshten, V.A. Problems of the movements of large meteoric bodies in the atmosphere. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1965. Bronshten, V.A. Physics of meteoric phenomena. Fizika meteornykh iavlenii, , Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Nauka, 1981 Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co, 1983. Bronshten, V.A. Nature and destruction of the Tunguska cosmical body. Planetary and Space Science 48, 855-70, 2000. Brown, P., Edwards, W., ReVelle, D., Spurny, P. Acoustic analysis of shock production by very high-altitude meteors-I: infrasonic observations, dynamics and luminosity. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar- Terrestrial Physics 69, 600-20, 2007. Brown, P., ReVelle, D.O., Silber, E.A., et al. Analysis of a crater-forming meteorite impact in Peru. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 113, 2008. Brown, P., Spalding, R.E., ReVelle, D.O., Tagliaferri, E., Worden, S.P. The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth. Nature 420, 294, 2002. Brown, P.G., Assink, J.D., Astiz, L., et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature 503, 238, 2013. Brun, R. Introduction to reactive gas dynamics. OUP Oxford, New York, NY, 2009. Brun, R. High Temperature Phenomena in Shock Waves. 1 ed. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Buriti, R.A., Hocking, W.K., Batista, P.P., Medeiros, A.F., Clemesha, B.R. Observations of equatorial mesospheric winds over Cariri (7.4° S) by a meteor radar and comparison with existing models. Ann. Geophys. 26, 485-97, 2008. Camm, J.C., Kivel, B., Taylor, R.L., Teare, J.D. Absolute intensity of non-equilibrium radiation in air and stagnation heating at high altitudes. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 1, 53- 75, 1961. Campbell-Brown, M., Koschny, D. Model of the ablation of faint meteors. Astronomy & Astrophysics 418, 751-8, 2004. Campbell-Brown, M.D., Borovička, J., Brown, P.G., Stokan, E. High-resolution modelling of meteoroid ablation. A&A 557, A41, 2013. 54 Candler, G.V., Subbareddy, P.K., Brock, J.M. Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods for Hypersonic Flows. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 52, 17-28, 2015. Carbary, J.F., Morrison, D., Romick, G.J., Yee, J.H. Leonid meteor spectrum from 110 to 860 nm. Icarus 161, 223-34, 2003. Carlson, H., Roveda, R., Boyd, I., Candler, G. A Hybrid CFD-DSMC Method of Modeling Continuum-Rarefied Flows. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004. Carter, H., Raper, J., Hinson, W., Morris, W. Basic Measurements from a Turbulent-Heating Flight Experiment on a 5 Half-Angle Cone at Mach 20 (Reentry F). NASA TM X-2308, 1971. Ceplecha, Z. A model of spectral radiation of bright fireballs. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia 24, 232, 1973. Ceplecha, Z., Borovička, J., Elford, W.G., et al. Meteor phenomena and bodies. Space Science Reviews 84, 327- 471, 1998. Ceplecha, Z., Revelle, D.O. Fragmentation model of meteoroid motion, mass loss, and radiation in the atmosphere. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, 35-54, 2005. Cercignani, C. Rarefied gas dynamics: from basic concepts to actual calculations. Cambridge University Press, 2000. Cervera, M.A., Reid, I.M. Comparison of atmospheric parameters derived from meteor observations with CIRA. Radio Science 35, 833-43, 2000. Cevolani, G., Pupillo, G. Ground-based radio observations to probe the ozone content in the meteor region. Annals of Geophysics, 2003. Chau, J.L., Woodman, R.F. Observations of meteor-head echoes using the Jicamarca 50MHz radar in interferometer mode. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 511-21, 2004. Christie, D.R., Campus, P. The IMS Infrasound Network: Design and Establishment of Infrasound Stations. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 29-75, 2010. Chul, P., Jeffrey, D.B. Fragmentation and Spreading of a Meteor-like Object. The Astronomical Journal 144, 184, 2012. Chyba, C.F., Thomas, P.J., Zahnle, K.J. The 1908 Tunguska explosion: atmospheric disruption of a stony asteroid. Nature 361, 40, 1993. Close, S., Brown, P., Campbell-Brown, M., Oppenheim, M., Colestock, P. Meteor head echo radar data: Mass– velocity selection effects. Icarus 186, 547-56, 2007. Close, S., Hamlin, T., Oppenheim, M., Cox, L., Colestock, P. Dependence of radar signal strength on frequency and aspect angle of nonspecular meteor trails. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 113, 2008. Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., Marcus, R.A. Earth Impact Effects Program: A Web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact on Earth. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, 817-40, 2005. Cook, A.F., Hawkins, G.S. The meteoric head echo. Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics 5, 1-7, 1960. Corradini, M.L., Kim, B.J., Oh, M.D. Vapor explosions in light water reactors: A review of theory and modeling. Progress in Nuclear Energy 22, 1-117, 1988. Crawford, D.A. Comet Shoemaker‐Levy 9 Fragment Size Estimates: How Big Was the Parent Body? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 822, 155-73, 1997. Dawkins, E.C.M., Plane, J.M.C., Chipperfield, M.P., Feng, W. The near‐global mesospheric potassium layer: Observations and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120, 7975-87, 2015. de Groot-Hedlin, C.D., Hedlin, M.A.H., Drob, D.P. Atmospheric Variability and Infrasound Monitoring. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 475-507, 2010. 55 DeVincenzi, D.L., Race, M.S., Klein, H.P. Planetary protection, sample return missions and Mars exploration: History, status, and future needs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 103, 28577-85, 1998. Dobrovol'skii, O.V. The Blast Wave Associated With the Motion of a Meteoric Body. Byull. SAO 6, 11-6, 1952. Donn, W.L., Rind, D. Natural Infrasound as an Atmospheric Probe. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 26, 111-33, 1971. Dressler, R.A., Murad, E. The gas phase chemical dynamics associated with meteors. Chemical Dynamics in Extreme Environments, edited by Dressler, RA, World Scientific, Singapore, 268-348, 2001. Drob, D.P., Picone, J.M., Garcés, M. Global morphology of infrasound propagation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108, 2003. Drolshagen, G., Koschny, D., Drolshagen, S., Kretschmer, J., Poppe, B. Mass accumulation of earth from interplanetary dust, meteoroids, asteroids and comets. Planetary and Space Science 143, 21-7, 2017. Dyrud, L., Janches, D. Modeling the meteor head echo using Arecibo radar observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 70, 1621-32, 2008. Edwards, W.N. Meteor Generated Infrasound: Theory and Observation. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 361-414, 2010. Erdman, P.W., Zipf, E.C., Espy, P., et al. Flight measurements of low-velocity bow shock ultraviolet radiation. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 7, 37-41, 1993. Fegley, B., Cameron, A.G.W. A vaporization model for iron/silicate fractionation in the Mercury protoplanet. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 82, 207-22, 1987. Feng, W., Marsh Daniel, R., Chipperfield Martyn, P., et al. A global atmospheric model of meteoric iron. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118, 9456-74, 2013. Few, A.A. Power spectrum of thunder. Journal of Geophysical Research 74, 6926-34, 1969. Florenskiy, K. Preliminary results from the 1961 combined tunguska meteorite expedition (Physical effects of Tunguska meteorite of 1908, noting particularly flattening of forest trees). Meteoritica 23, 3-37, 1963. Francey, J. Ambipolar diffusion in meteor trails. Australian Journal of Physics 16, 500-6, 1963. Franke, S.J., Chu, X., Liu, A.Z., Hocking, W.K. Comparison of meteor radar and Na Doppler lidar measurements of winds in the mesopause region above Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 110, n/a-n/a, 2005. Fritts, D.C., Janches, D., Iimura, H., Hocking, W.K., Bageston, J.V., Leme, N.M.P. Drake Antarctic Agile Meteor Radar first results: Configuration and comparison of mean and tidal wind and gravity wave momentum flux measurements with Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117, 1-17, 2012. Gainville, O., Henneton, M., Coulouvrat, F. A re-analysis of Carancas meteorite seismic and infrasound data based on sonic boom hypothesis. Geophysical Journal International 209, 1913-23, 2017. Galligan, D., Thomas, G., Baggaley, W. On the relationship between meteor height and ambipolar diffusion. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics 66, 899-906, 2004. Georges, T.M., Beasley, W.H. Refraction of infrasound by upper‐atmospheric winds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61, 28-34, 1977. Gershbein, E.A. Theory of the hypersonic viscous shock layer at high Reynolds numbers and intensive injection of foreign gases: PMM vol. 38, n≗ 6, 1974, pp. 1015–1024. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 38, 962-72, 1974. Gilbert, G.N. Growth and decline of a scientific speacialty: The case of radar meteor research. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 58, 273-7, 1977. Glasstone, S., Dolan, P.J. The effects of nuclear weapons. Department of Defense, Washington, DC (USA); Department of Energy, Washington, DC (USA), Washington, DC, pp. 653, 1977. Gnoffo, P.A. Planetary-Entry Gas Dynamics 1. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 31, 459-94, 1999. 56 Gnoffo, P.A., Johnston, C.O., Kleb, B. Challenges to computational aerothermodynamic simulation and validation for planetary entry vehicle analysis. 2010. Greenstreet, S., Ngo, H., Gladman, B. The orbital distribution of Near-Earth Objects inside Earth's orbit. Icarus 217, 355-66, 2012. Gritsevich, M., Dmitriev, V., Vinnikov, V., et al. Constraining the Pre-atmospheric Parameters of Large Meteoroids: Košice, a Case Study. In: Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M., Gritsevich, M., Palme, H., (Eds.). Assessment and Mitigation of Asteroid Impact Hazards. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 153-83, 2017. Gritsevich, M., Koschny, D. Constraining the luminous efficiency of meteors. Icarus 212, 877-84, 2011. Gritsevich, M.I. The Pribram, Lost City, Innisfree, and Neuschwanstein falls: An analysis of the atmospheric trajectories. Solar System Research 42, 372-90, 2008. Gritsevich, M.I. Determination of parameters of meteor bodies based on flight observational data. Advances in Space Research 44, 323-34, 2009. Halliday, I., Griffin, A.A., Blackwell, A.T. Detailed data for 259 fireballs from the Canadian camera network and inferences concerning the influx of large meteoroids. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 31, 185-217, 1996. Hammel, H.B., Beebe, R.F., Ingersoll, A.P., et al. HST Imaging of Atmospheric Phenomena Created by the Impact of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. Science 267, 1288-96, 1995. Hao, J., Wang, J., Lee, C. Numerical study of hypersonic flows over reentry configurations with different chemical nonequilibrium models. Acta Astronautica 126, 1-10, 2016. Harris, A. The Population and Impact Frequency of Tunguska-size NEAs. NASA Ames Workshop. 2018. Harris, A.W. Evaluation of ground-based optical surveys for near-Earth asteroids. Planetary and Space Science 46, 283-90, 1998. Harris, A.W., D'Abramo, G. The population of near-Earth asteroids. Icarus 257, 302-12, 2015. Hartmann, W.K. Terrestrial, lunar, and interplanetary rock fragmentation. Icarus 10, 201-13, 1969. Harvey, G.A. Spectral analysis of four meteors. NASA Special Publication. NASA, State University of New York, Albany, NY, on June 14-17, June 1971, pp. 103, 1973. Hash, D., Olejniczak, J., Wright, M., et al. FIRE II Calculations for Hypersonic Nonequilibrium Aerothermodynamics Code Verification: DPLR, LAURA, and US3D. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. Hayes, W., Probstein, R.F. Hypersonic flow theory. Academic Press, New York, 1959. Haynes, C.P., Millet, C. A sensitivity analysis of meteoric infrasound. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 118, 2073-82, 2013. Henneton, M., Gainville, O., Coulouvrat, F. Numerical Simulation of Sonic Boom from Hypersonic Meteoroids. AIAA Journal 53, 2560-70, 2015. Hill, K., Rogers, L., Hawkes, R. Sputtering and high altitude meteors. Earth, Moon, and Planets 95, 403-12, 2004. Hills, J.G., Goda, M.P. The fragmentation of small asteroids in the atmosphere. The Astronomical Journal 105, 1114-44, 1993. Hocking, W., Fuller, B., Vandepeer, B. Real-time determination of meteor-related parameters utilizing modern digital technology. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 63, 155-69, 2001. Hocking, W.K., Röttger, J., Palmer, R.D., Sato, T., Chilson, P.B. Atmospheric Radar: Application and Science of MST Radars in the Earth's Mesosphere, Stratosphere, Troposphere, and Weakly Ionized Regions. 1 ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2016a. Hocking, W.K., Silber, R.E., Plane, J.M., Feng, W., Garbanzo-Salas, M. Decay times of transitionally dense specularly reflecting meteor trails and potential chemical impact on trail lifetimes. Annales Geophysicae 34, 1119, 2016b. Holdsworth, D.A., Tsutsumi, M., Reid, I.M., Nakamura, T., Tsuda, T. Interferometric meteor radar phase calibration using meteor echoes. Radio Science 39, n/a-n/a, 2004. 57 Holway, L.H. Ambipolar diffusion in the geomagnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research 70, 3635-45, 1965. Hughes, D.W. The history of meteors and meteor showers. Vistas in Astronomy 26, 325-45, 1982. Hurle, I. Chemico-physical processes in shock waves. Reports on progress in physics 30, 149, 1967. Hutchens, G.J. Approximate cylindrical blast theory: Near‐field solutions. Journal of applied physics 77, 2912-5, 1995. IAU. Jacchia, L.G. On two parameters used in the physical theory of meteors. Smithsonian Contribution to Astrophysics 2, 181, 1958. Janches, D., Close, S., Fentzke, J.T. A comparison of detection sensitivity between ALTAIR and Arecibo meteor observations: Can high power and large aperture radars detect low velocity meteor head-echoes. Icarus 193, 105-11, 2008. Janches, D., Heinselman, C.J., Chau, J.L., Chandran, A., Woodman, R. Modeling the global micrometeor input function in the upper atmosphere observed by high power and large aperture radars. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 111, n/a-n/a, 2006. Janches, D., Hocking, W., Pifko, S., et al. Interferometric meteor head echo observations using the Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 119, 2269-87, 2014. Jenniskens, P., Fries, M.D., Yin, Q.-Z., et al. Radar-Enabled Recovery of the Sutter's Mill Meteorite, a Carbonaceous Chondrite Regolith Breccia. Science 338, 1583, 2012. Jenniskens, P., Laux, C.O., Wilson, M.A., Schaller, E.L. The mass and speed dependence of meteor air plasma temperatures. Astrobiology 4, 81-94, 2004a. Jenniskens, P., Stenbaek-Nielsen, H.C. Meteor wake in high frame-rate images-implications for the chemistry of ablated organic compounds. Astrobiology 4, 95-108, 2004b. Jenniskens, P., Wilson, M.A., Packan, D., et al. Meteors: A delivery mechanism of organic matter to the early Earth. Leonid Storm Research. Springer, 57-70, 2000. Johnston, C.O., Stern, E.C., Wheeler, L.F. Radiative heating of large meteoroids during atmospheric entry. Icarus 309, 25-44, 2018. Jones, D., Goyer, G., Plooster, M. Shock wave from a lightning discharge. Journal of Geophysical Research 73, 3121-7, 1968. Jones, G.O.L., Berkey, F.T., Fish, C.S., Hocking, W.K., Taylor, M.J. Validation of imaging Doppler interferometer winds using meteor radar. Geophysical Research Letters 30, n/a-n/a, 2003. Jones, J., Campbell-Brown, M. The initial train radius of sporadic meteors. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 359, 1131-6, 2005. Jones, W. Theory of the initial radius of meteor trains. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 275, 812-8, 1995. Jones, W. Theoretical and observational determinations of the ionization coefficient of meteors. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 288, 995-1003, 1997. Jones, W., Halliday, I. Effects of excitation and ionization in meteor trains. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 320, 417-23, 2001. Jones, W., Jones, J. Ionic diffusion in meteor trains. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 52, 185-91, 1990. Jones, W.L., Jr, Cross, A.E. Electrostatic-probe measurements of plasma parameters for two reentry flight experiments at 25000 feet per second. NASA Langley Research Center; Hampton, VA, Hampton, VA, USA, pp. 131, 1972. Jones, W.M., Davidson, N. The thermal decomposition of ozone in a shock tube. Journal of the American Chemical Society 84, 2868-78, 1962. Josyula, E., Burt, J. Review of Rarefied Gas Effects in Hypersonic Applications. DTIC Document RTO-EN- AVT-194, pp. 40, 2011. 58 Kalashnikova, O., Horányi, M., Thomas, G.E., Toon, O.B. Meteoric smoke production in the atmosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 27, 3293-6, 2000. Keck, J.C., Camm, J.C., Kivel, B., Wentink, T. Radiation from hot air: Part II. Shock tube study of absolute intensities. Annals of Physics 7, 1-38, 1959. Kemp, N.H. Laminar Heat Transfer Around Blunt Bodies in Dissociated Air. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 26, 421-30, 1959. Kivel, B. Radiation From Hot Air and Its Effect on Stagnation-Point Heating. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 28, 96-102, 1961. Kogan, M.N. Rarefied gas dynamics. Plenum Press, New York, 1969. Koppenwallner, G. Fundamentals of hypersonics: aerodynamics and heat transfer. 1984, 64, 1984. Kornegay, W.M. Production and Propagation of Spherical Shock Waves at Low Ambient Pressures. Massachusetts Inst of Tech Lexington Lincoln Lab, pp. 35, 1965. Krehl, P.O. History of shock waves, explosions and impact: a chronological and biographical reference. 1 ed. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 2009. Kulagin, V., Shustov, B., Kuznetsov, Y.M., et al. Methods and means of information-analytical assessment of asteroid and comet hazard. Solar System Research 50, 464-70, 2016. Kulichkov, S. On the Prospects for Acoustic Sounding of the Fine Structure of the Middle Atmosphere. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 511-40, 2010. Kustova, E., Krylov, A., Lashkov, V., Mekhonoshina, M. Experimental Facilities and Modelling for Rarefied Aerodynamics. Saint Petersburg State Univ (Russia) Dept of Mathematics And Mechanics, pp. 21, 2011. Lago, V., Chpoun, A., Chanetz, B. Shock Waves in Hypersonic Rarefied Flows. In: Brun, R., (Ed.). High Temperature Phenomena in Shock Waves. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg 271-98, 2012. Larina, I. Investigation of the supersonic flow of a rarefied gas past a sphere. Chislennye Metody v Dinamike Razrezhennykh Gazov, 77-94, 1975. Laurence, S.J., Deiterding, R., Hornung, G. Proximal bodies in hypersonic flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 590, 209-37, 2007. Laurence, S.J., Parziale, N.J., Deiterding, R. Dynamical separation of spherical bodies in supersonic flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 713, 159-82, 2012. Lebedinets, V.N., Portnyagin, Y.I., Sosnova, A.K. Drag and Heat-Transfer Coefficients of Meteorites. I. Weak Shielding Conditions. Solar System Res. 3, 187-91, 1969. Lees, L., Hromas, L. Turbulent diffusion in the wake of a bluntnosed body at hyprsonic speeds. Space Technology Laboratories Inc., LA, California, pp. 114, 1961. Lees, L., Hromas, L. Turbulent diffusion in the wake of a blunt-nosed body at hypersonic speeds. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 29, 976-93, 1962. Levin, B.J. The Physical Theory of Meteors, and Meteoric Matter in the Solar System. American Meteorological Society, 1956. Levin, D.A., Candler, G.V., Collins, R.J., et al. Comparison of theory with experiment for the bow shock ultraviolet rocket flight. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 7, 30-6, 1993. Li, Z.-H., Peng, A.-P., Zhang, H.-X., Yang, J.-Y. Rarefied gas flow simulations using high-order gas-kinetic unified algorithms for Boltzmann model equations. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 74, 81-113, 2015. Liberman, M.A., Velikovich, A.L. Physics of shock waves in gases and plasmas. Springer Verlag Springer Series on Electrophysics 19, 1986. Liller, W., Whipple, F.L. High-altitude winds by meteor-train photography. Special Supplement to the Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 1, 112, 1954. Lin, S.C. Cylindrical shock waves produced by instantaneous energy release. Journal of Applied Physics 25, 54-7, 1954. 59 Longo, J., Hannemann, K., Hannemann, V. The challenge of modeling high speed flows. 2007. Lukasiewicz, J. Blast-Hypersonic Flow Analogy Theory and Application. ARS Journal 32, 1341-6, 1962. Maglieri, D.J., Bobbitt, P.J., Plotkin, K.J., Shepherd, K.P., Coen, P.G., Richwine, D.M. Sonic boom: Six decades of research. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA, pp. 539, 2014. Mainzer, A. The future of planetary defense. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 122, 789-93, 2017. Mainzer, A., Grav, T., Bauer, J., et al. NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results. The Astrophysical Journal 743, 156, 2011. Malhotra, A., Mathews, J.D., Urbina, J. A radio science perspective on long-duration meteor trails. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 112, 2007. Manning, L.A., Eshleman, V.R. Meteors in the Ionosphere. Proceedings of the IRE 47, 186-99, 1959. Marsh, D.R., Janches, D., Feng, W., Plane, J.M.C. A global model of meteoric sodium. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 118, 11,442-11,52, 2013. Marsh, S., Baggaley, W. Meteor trains as a probe for measuring the dynamics of the upper atmosphere. In: Warmbein, B., (Ed.). Meteoroids 2001 Conference. ESA Publications Division, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 381- 4, 2001. Marshall, R.A., Brown, P., Close, S. Plasma distributions in meteor head echoes and implications for radar cross section interpretation. Planetary and Space Science 143, 203-8, 2017. Masoud, M., El-Khalafawy, T., Souprunenko, V. High-speed shock-wave investigation in rarefied gas. Nuclear Fusion 9, 49, 1969. Mathews, J.D. Radio science issues surrounding HF/VHF/UHF radar meteor studies. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 66, 285-99, 2004. McCrosky, R.E. The meteor wake. The Astronomical Journal 63, 97-105, 1958. McKinley, D.W.R. Meteor science and engineering. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1961. McNamara, J.J., Friedmann, P.P. Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis in Hypersonic Flow: Past, Present, and Future. AIAA Journal 49, 1089-122, 2011. McNeil, W.J., Lai, S.T., Murad, E. Differential ablation of cosmic dust and implications for the relative abundances of atmospheric metals. Journal of Geophysical Research 103, 10899-912, 1998. Meek, C.E., Manson, A.H., Hocking, W.K., Drummond, J.R. Eureka, 80° N, SKiYMET meteor radar temperatures compared with Aura MLS values. Ann. Geophys. 31, 1267-77, 2013. Melosh, H.J. Atmospheric breakup of terrestrial impactors. Multi-ring basins: Formation and Evolution, Proceedings of the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Pergamon Press, NY, Houston, TX, pp. 29- 35, 1981. Melosh, H.J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process. Oxford University Press, Tuscon, AZ, 1989. Menees, G.P., Park, C. Nitric oxide formation by meteoroids in the upper atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment 10, 535-45, 1976. Mironov, V.V., Murtazov, A.K. Model of meteoroid risk in near-Earth space. Cosmic Research 53, 430-6, 2015. Mirtov, B.A. The mechanism of formation of a meteor trail. Soviet Astronomy 4, 485, 1960. Moorhead, A.V., Brown, P.G., Campbell-Brown, M.D., Heynen, D., Cooke, W.J. Fully correcting the meteor speed distribution for radar observing biases. Planetary and Space Science 143, 209-17, 2017. Moreno-Ibáñez, M., Silber, E.A., Gritsevich, M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M. Flight flow regimes of meteoroids determined from infrasound detection. 49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. The Woodlands, TX, USA, pp. 2327, 2018. Mutschlecner, J.P., Whitaker, R.W. Some Atmospheric Effects on Infrasound Signal Amplitudes. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 455-74, 2010. Needham, C. Blast Waves. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. 60 Nemchinov, I.V., Tsikulin, M.A. Evaluation of Heat Transfer by Radiation for Large Meteors Moving in the Atmosphere at Great Velocity. Geomagnetics and Aeronomy 3, 635-46, 1963. Nemec, M., Aftosmis, M.J., Brown, P.G. Numerical prediction of meteoric infrasound signatures. Planetary and Space Science 140, 11-20, 2017. Nerem, R.M. Radiating flows around re-entry bodies. Ohio State Univ Research Foundation Columbus, Dept of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, Ohio, USA, pp. 39, 1965. Niu, K. Shock waves in gas and plasma. Laser and Particle Beams 14, 125-32, 2009. Notsu, K., Onuma, N., Nishida, N., Nagasawa, H. High temperature heating of the Allende meteorite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42, 903-7, 1978. Öpik, E.J. Physics of meteor flight in the atmosphere. Dover Publications, 1958. Oppenheim, M.M., Dimant, Y.S. First 3-D simulations of meteor plasma dynamics and turbulence. Geophysical Research Letters 42, 681-7, 2015. Oran, E.S., Oh, C.K., Cybyk, B.Z. DIRECT SIMULATION MONTE CARLO: Recent Advances and Applications. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 30, 403-41, 1998. Palotai, C., Korycansky, D.G., Harrington, J., Rebeli, N., Gabriel, T. Plume Development of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 Comet Impact. The Astrophysical Journal 731, 3, 2011. Pancheva, D., Mitchell, N.J., Manson, A.H., et al. Variability of the quasi-2-day wave observed in the MLT region during the PSMOS campaign of June–August 1999. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 66, 539-65, 2004. Panesi, M., Magin, T., Huo, W., Levin, D.A., Wysong, I.J., Garcia, A.L. Nonequilibrium ionization phenomena behind shock waves. AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics. pp. 1251, 2011. Park, C., Menees, G.P. Odd nitrogen production by meteoroids. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 83, 4029-35, 1978. Passey, Q.R., Melosh, H.J. Effects of atmospheric breakup on crater field formation. Icarus 42, 211-33, 1980. Pellinen-Wannberg, A. Meteor head echoes-observations and models. Annales geophysicae. pp. 201-5, 2005. Pelton, J.N., Allahdadi, F. Handbook of Cosmic Hazards and Planetary Defense. Springer, Cham, New York, NY, 2015. Perepukhov, V.A. Aerodynamic characteristics of a sphere and a blunt cone in a flow of highly rarefied gas. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7, 276-88, 1967. Plane, J.M. Atmospheric chemistry of meteoric metals. Chemical reviews 103, 4963-84, 2003. Plane, J.M. Cosmic dust in the earth's atmosphere. Chemical Society Reviews 41, 6507-18, 2012. Plane, J.M., Feng, W., Dawkins, E.C. The mesosphere and metals: Chemistry and changes. Chemical reviews 115, 4497-541, 2015. Plane, J.M.C. A time-resolved model of the mesospheric Na layer: constraints on the meteor input function. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 627-38, 2004. Plooster, M.N. Shock waves from line sources. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Co, pp. 96, 1968. Plooster, M.N. Shock waves from line sources. Numerical solutions and experimental measurements. Physics of Fluids 13, 2665-75, 1970. Pond, J.W.T., Palotai, C., Gabriel, T., Korycansky, D.G., Harrington, J., Rebeli, N. Numerical Modeling of the 2009 Impact Event on Jupiter. The Astrophysical Journal 745, 113, 2012. Popova, O. Meteoroid ablation models. Earth, Moon, and Planets 95, 303-19, 2005. Popova, O. Passage of bolides through the atmosphere. Meteoroids: The Smallest Solar System Bodies. Huntsville, AL, USA, pp. 232-42, 2011. Popova, O., Nemchinov, I. Bolides in the Earth Atmosphere. In: Adushkin, V., Nemchinov, I., (Eds.). Catastrophic Events Caused by Cosmic Objects. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 131-62, 2008. 61 Popova, O., Sidneva, S., Strelkov, A., Shuvalov, V. Formation of disturbed area around fast meteor body. Meteoroids 2001 Conference. pp. 237-45, 2001. Popova, O.P., Jenniskens, P., Emel'yanenko, V., et al. Chelyabinsk Airburst, Damage Assessment, Meteorite Recovery, and Characterization. Science 342, 1069-73, 2013. Popova, O.P., Sidneva, S.N., Shuvalov, V.V., Strelkov, A.S. Screening of meteoroids by ablation vapor in high- velocity meteors. Earth, Moon, and Planets 82, 109-28, 2000. Popova, O.P., Strelkov, A.S., Sidneva, S.N., Shuvalov, V.V. Formation of disturbed area around fast meteor body. The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science. Report 0288-433X, pp. 199-206, 2003. Poulter, E., Baggaley, W. Radiowave scattering from meteoric ionization. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 39, 757-68, 1977. Poulter, E., Baggaley, W. The applications of radio-wave scattering theory to radio-meteor observations. Planetary and Space Science 26, 969-77, 1978. Prasanth, P., Kakkassery, J.K. Direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC): A numerical method for transition-regime flows-A review. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 86, 169, 2006. Probstein, R.F. Aerodynamics of rarefied gases. In: Devienne, F.M., (Ed.). The First International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics. Pergamon Press, pp. 258, 1960. Probstein, R.F. Shock wave and flow field development in hypersonic re-entry. ARS Journal 31, 185-94, 1961. Räbinä, J., Mönkölä, S., Rossi, T., Markkanen, J., Gritsevich, M., Muinonen, K. Controlled time integration for the numerical simulation of meteor radar reflections. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 178, 295-305, 2016. Rajchl, J. On the interaction layer in front of a meteor body. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia 20, 363, 1969. Rajchl, J. Shock waves and flares by meteors. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia 23, 357- 65, 1972. Register, P.J., Mathias, D.L., Wheeler, L.F. Asteroid fragmentation approaches for modeling atmospheric energy deposition. Icarus 284, 157-66, 2017. Reis, V.H. Chemiluminescent radiation from the far wake of hypersonic spheres. AIAA Journal 5, 1928-33, 1967. ReVelle, D., Whitaker, R. Lamb waves from airborne explosion sources: Viscous effects and comparisons to ducted acoustic arrivals. Los Alamos National Lab., NM, USA, 1996. ReVelle, D.O. Acoustics of meteors-effects of the atmospheric temperature and wind structure on the sounds produced by meteors. Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor MI, USA, 1974. ReVelle, D.O. On meteor‐generated infrasound. Journal of Geophysical Research 81, 1217-30, 1976. Revelle, D.O. A quasi-simple ablation model for large meteorite entry: theory vs observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 41, 453-73, 1979. Revelle, D.O. Historical Detection of Atmospheric Impacts by Large Bolides Using Acoustic-Gravity Wavesa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 822, 284-302, 1997. ReVelle, D.O. Theoretical Leonid entry modeling. Los Alamos National Lab., NM (US), Los Alamos, NM, 2001. Revelle, D.O. Recent Advances in Bolide Entry Modeling: A Bolide Potpourri. In: Hawkes, R., Mann, I., Brown, P., (Eds.). Modern Meteor Science An Interdisciplinary View. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 441-76, 2005. ReVelle, D.O. Acoustic-Gravity Waves from Bolide Sources. Earth, Moon, and Planets 102, 345-56, 2008. ReVelle, D.O. Acoustic-Gravity Waves from Impulsive Sources in the Atmosphere. In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht 305-59, 2010. Revelle, D.O., Ceplecha, Z. Bolide physical theory with application to PN and EN fireballs. In: Warmbein, B., (Ed.). Meteoroids 2001 Conference. pp. 507-12, 2001. 62 Rogers, L., Hill, K., Hawkes, R. Mass loss due to sputtering and thermal processes in meteoroid ablation. Planetary and Space Science 53, 1341-54, 2005. Romig, M.F. The Physics of Meteor Entry. The RAND Corporation (declassified). DTIC Document, Santa Monica, California, 1964. Romig, M.F. Physics of meteor entry. AIAA Journal 3, 385-94, 1965. Sachdev, P. Shock Waves and Explosions. CRC Press, 2004. Sakurai, A. On the Propagation and Structure of the Blast Wave, I. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 8, 662-9, 1953. Sakurai, A. On the Propagation and Structure of a Blast Wave, II. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 9, 256- 66, 1954. Sakurai, A. Blast wave theory. DTIC Document, No. MRC-TSR-497, Wisconsin Univ-Madison Mathematics Research Center, 1964. Sakurai, A. Blast wave theory. In: Holts, M., (Ed.). Basic Developments in Fluid Dynamics. 1 ed. Academic Press, New York, NY 309-75, 1965. Sarma, G. Physico–chemical modelling in hypersonic flow simulation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 36, 281- 349, 2000. Scanlon, T.J., White, C., Borg, M.K., et al. Open-Source Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Chemistry Modeling for Hypersonic Flows. AIAA Journal 53, 1670-80, 2015. Schultz, P., Sugita, S. Penetrating and escaping the atmospheres of Venus and Earth. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. pp. 1215, 1994. Schwartzentruber, T.E., Boyd, I.D. A hybrid particle-continuum method applied to shock waves. Journal of Computational Physics 215, 402-16, 2006. Sedov, L. Propagation of intense blast waves. Prikladnaya Matematika i Mekhanika (PMM) 10, 241-50, 1946. Shen, C. Rarefied gas dynamics: fundamentals, simulations and micro flows. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 2005. Shoemaker, E., Lowery, C. Airwaves associated with large fireballs and the frequency distribution of energy of large meteoroids. Meteoritics 3, 123-4, 1967. Shuvalov, V.V., Artem'eva, N.A., Kosarev, I.B. 3D hydrodynamic code sova for multimaterial flows, application to Shoemakerlevy 9 comet impact problem. International Journal of Impact Engineering 23, 847-58, 1999. Shuvalov, V.V., Artemieva, N.A. Numerical modeling of Tunguska-like impacts. Planetary and Space Science 50, 181-92, 2002. Silber, E.A. Observational and theoretical investigation of cylindrical line source blast theory using meteors. Physics and Astronomy. Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2014. Silber, E.A., Brown, P.G. Optical observations of meteors generating infrasound-I: Acoustic signal identification and phenomenology. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 119, 116-28, 2014. Silber, E.A., Brown, P.G. Infrasound monitoring as a tool to characterize impacting Near-Earth Objects (NEOs). In: Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., Hauchecorne, A., (Eds.). Infrasound and middle-atmospheric monitoring: Challenges and Perspectives. 2019. Silber, E.A., Brown, P.G., Krzeminski, Z. Optical observations of meteors generating infrasound: Weak shock theory and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 120, 413-28, 2015. Silber, E.A., Hocking, W.K., Niculescu, M.L., Gritsevich, M., Silber, R.E. On shock waves and the role of hyperthermal chemistry in the early diffusion of overdense meteor trains. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469, 1869-82, 2017a. Silber, E.A., Le Pichon, A., Brown, P.G. Infrasonic detection of a near-Earth object impact over Indonesia on 8 October 2009. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 2011. 63 Silber, E.A., ReVelle, D.O., Brown, P.G., Edwards, W.N. An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 114, 2009. Silber, R.E., Hocking, W.K., Silber, E.A., Gritsevich, M., Niculescu, M.L. Detection and Characterization of Meteor Shockwaves Using Radar Observed Meteor Head Echo/Height Correlation. 32nd URSI GASS. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2017b. Singer, W., Bremer, J., Hocking, W.K., Weiss, J., Latteck, R., Zechal, M. Temperature and wind tides around the summer mesopause at middle and arctic latitudes. Advances in Space Research 31, 2055-60, 2003. Steiner, H., Gretler, W. The propagation of spherical and cylindrical shock waves in real gases. Physics of Fluids 6, 2154-64, 1994. Stokes, G.H., Barbee, B.W., Bottke, W.F., Jr., et al. Update to Determine the Feasibility of Enhancing the Search and Characterization of NEOs. Report of the Near-Earth Object Science Defnition Team NASA, 2017. Strack, S.L. Radiant Heat Transfer Around Re-Entry Bodies. ARS Journal 32, 744-8, 1962. Stulov, V.P. A Strong Blast at the Surface of a Blunt Body in a Supersonic Flow. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, 89-97, 1972. Stulov, V.P. Interactions of Space Bodies With Atmospheres of Planets. Applied Mechanics Reviews 50, 671-88, 1997. Suggs, R.M., Moser, D.E., Cooke, W.J., Suggs, R.J. The flux of kilogram-sized meteoroids from lunar impact monitoring. Icarus 238, 23-36, 2014. Sutherland, L.C., Bass, H.E. Atmospheric absorption in the atmosphere up to 160 km. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115, 1012-32, 2004. Sutton, K. Air radiation revisited. In: Nelson, H.F., (Ed.). Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, NY 419-41, 1985. Svetsov, V.V. Total ablation of the debris from the 1908 Tunguska explosion. Nature 383, 697, 1996. Svetsov, V.V., Nemtchinov, I.V., Teterev, A.V. Disintegration of Large Meteoroids in Earth's Atmosphere: Theoretical Models. Icarus 116, 131-53, 1995. Tabetah, M.E., Melosh, H.J. Air penetration enhances fragmentation of entering meteoroids. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 53, 493-504, 2018. Taniguchi, S., Arima, T., Ruggeri, T., Sugiyama, M. Thermodynamic theory of the shock wave structure in a rarefied polyatomic gas: beyond the Bethe-Teller theory. Physical Review E 89, 013025, 2014. Tapia, M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M. Natural Hazard Associated to Shock Waves of Meter-Sized Meteoroids. In: Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M., Gritsevich, M., Palme, H., (Eds.). Assessment and Mitigation of Asteroid Impact Hazards. Springer International Publishing, Cham 199-218, 2017. Taylor, G. The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I. Theoretical discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 201, 159, 1950. Tolstoy, I. Wave propagation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (USA), 1973. Tricarico, P. The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations. Icarus 284, 416-23, 2017. Trilling, D., Valdes, F., Allen, L., et al. The size distribution of Near Earth Objects larger than 10 meters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04066, 2017. Tsien, H.-S. Similarity Laws of Hypersonic Flows. Journal of Mathematics and Physics 25, 247-51, 1946. Tsikulin, M. Shock waves during the movement of large meteorites in the atmosphere. DTIC Document AD 715- 537, Nat. Tech. Inform. Serv., Springfield, Va 1970. Tsutsumi, M., Tsuda, T., Nakamura, T., Fukao, S. Temperature fluctuations near the mesopause inferred from meteor observations with the middle and upper atmosphere radar. Radio Science 29, 599-610, 1994. Turco, R.P., Toon, O.B., Park, C., Whitten, R.C., Pollack, J.B., Noerdlinger, P. An analysis of the physical, chemical, optical, and historical impacts of the 1908 Tunguska meteor fall. Icarus 50, 1-52, 1982. 64 Vadas, S.L., Suzuki, H., Nicolls, M.J., Nakamura, T., Harmon, R.O. Atmospheric gravity waves excited by a fireball meteor: Observations and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119, 8583- 605, 2014. Vasilyev, N.V. The Tunguska Meteorite problem today. Planetary and Space Science 46, 129-50, 1998. Verniani, F. Meteor Masses and Luminosity. Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics 10, 141-95, 1967. Vinković, D. Thermalization of sputtered particles as the source of diffuse radiation from high altitude meteors. Advances in Space Research 39, 574-82, 2007. Vondrak, T., Plane, J., Broadley, S., Janches, D. A chemical model of meteoric ablation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 7015-31, 2008. Wang, W.-L., Boyd, I.D. Predicting continuum breakdown in hypersonic viscous flows. Physics of Fluids 15, 91- 100, 2003. Wang, W.-L., Sun, Q., Boyd, I. Towards Development of a Hybrid DSMC-CFD Method for Simulating Hypersonic Interacting Flows. 8th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, St. Louis, Missouri, 2002. Waszczak, A., Prince, T.A., Laher, R., et al. Small Near-Earth Asteroids in the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: A Real-Time Streak-detection System. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129, 034402, 2017. Weibull, W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of applied mechanics 18, 293-7, 1951. Weryk, R.J., Brown, P.G. Simultaneous radar and video meteors-II: Photometry and ionisation. Planetary and Space Science 81, 32-47, 2013. Westman, A., Wannberg, G., Pellinen-Wannberg, A. Meteor head echo altitude distributions and the height cutoff effect studied with the EISCAT HPLA UHF and VHF radars. Ann. Geophys. 22, 1575-84, 2004. Whalley, C.L., Martıīn, J.C.G., Wrightb, T.G., Plane, J.M. A kinetic study of Mg and Mg-containing ions reacting with O3, O2, N2, CO2, N2O and H2O: implications for magnesium ion chemistry in the upper atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 13, 6352-64, 2011. Wheeler, L.F., Register, P.J., Mathias, D.L. A fragment-cloud model for asteroid breakup and atmospheric energy deposition. Icarus 295, 149-69, 2017. Whipple, F. The great Siberian meteor and the waves, seismic and aerial, which it produced. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 56, 287-304, 1930. Whitham, G.B. Linear and nonlinear waves. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1974. Witte, L.C., Cox, J.E., Bouvier, J.E. The Vapor Explosion. JOM 22, 39-44, 1970. Zahnle, K.J. Airburst origin of dark shadows on Venus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 97, 10243-55, 1992. Zel'dovich, Y.B., Raizer, Y.P. Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena. Dover Publications, 2002. Zinn, J., Drummond, J. Observations of persistent Leonid meteor trails: 4. Buoyant rise/vortex formation as mechanism for creation of parallel meteor train pairs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 110, 2005. Zinn, J., O'Dean, P.J., ReVelle, D.O. Leonid meteor ablation, energy exchange, and trail morphology. Advances in Space Research 33, 1466-74, 2004. Zotkin, I., Tsikulin, M. Simulation of the explosion of the Tungus meteorite. Soviet Physics Doklady. pp. 183-6, 1966. 65
1702.06578	2	1702	2017-02-23T02:29:27	HD 106906: A Case Study for External Perturbations of a Debris Disk	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Models of debris disk morphology are often focused on the effects of a planet orbiting interior to or within the disk. Nonetheless, an exterior planetary-mass perturber can also excite eccentricities in a debris disk, via Laplace-Lagrange secular perturbations in the coplanar case or Kozai-Lidov perturbations for mutually inclined companions and disks. HD 106906 is an ideal example of such a system, as it harbors a confirmed exterior 11 M_Jup companion at a projected separation of 650 au outside a resolved, asymmetric disk. We use collisional and dynamical simulations to investigate the interactions between the disk and the companion, and to use the disk's observed morphology to place constraints on the companion's orbit. We conclude that the disk's observed morphology is consistent with perturbations from the observed exterior companion. Generalizing this result, we suggest that exterior perturbers, as well as interior planets, should be considered when investigating the cause of observed asymmetries in a debris disk.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	HD 106906: A Case Study for External Perturbations of a Debris Disk Erika R. Nesvold1, Smadar Naoz2,3, Michael Fitzgerald2 ABSTRACT Models of debris disk morphology are often focused on the effects of a planet orbiting interior to or within the disk. Nonetheless, an exterior planetary-mass perturber can also excite eccentricities in a debris disk, via Laplace-Lagrange secular perturbations in the coplanar case or Kozai-Lidov perturbations for mutually inclined companions and disks. HD 106906 is an ideal example of such a a system, as it harbors a confirmed exterior 11 MJup companion at a projected separation of 650 au outside a resolved, asymmetric disk. We use collisional and dynamical simulations to investigate the interactions between the disk and the companion, and to use the disk's observed morphology to place constraints on the companion's orbit. We conclude that the disk's observed morphology is consistent with perturbations from the observed exterior companion. Generalizing this result, we suggest that exterior perturbers, as well as interior planets, should be considered when investigating the cause of observed asymmetries in a debris disk. 1. Introduction Circumstellar debris disks are produced by the rocky and icy material leftover from the forma- tion of the star and any planets in the system. To date, over 1700 debris disks have been detected via the excess infrared emission in their star's spectral energy distribution (Cotten & Song 2016), and over 40 have been resolved with optical or infrared imaging (http://circumstellardisks.org). The architecture of the underlying planetary system can leave a distinct imprint on the morphol- ogy of a debris disk (Mouillet et al. 1997; Wyatt et al. 1999; Matthews et al. 2014; Nesvold & Kuchner 2015b; Lee & Chiang 2016; Nesvold et al. 2016). Modeling debris disk morphology is often focused on the effects of a planetary-mass perturber orbiting interior to or within the disk (Mouillet et al. 1997; Chiang et al. 2009; Pearce & Wyatt 2015; Nesvold & Kuchner 2015a). Nonetheless, exterior companions have been detected and inferred for several systems (Rodriguez & Zuckerman 2012; Bailey et al. 2014; Mawet et al. 2015), and dynamical 1Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5241 Broad Branch Rd, Washington, DC 20015 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, 475 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 3Mani L. Bhaumik Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095 -- 2 -- modeling suggests that an exterior perturber can also excite eccentricities of the particles in a debris disk, via Laplace-Lagrange secular perturbations in the near-coplanar case (Th´ebault et al. 2012) or Kozai-Lidov perturbations for mutually inclined companions and disks (Nesvold et al. 2016), inducing asymmetries in the disk and triggering a collisional cascade. Collisions between the disk particles produce smaller dust grains whose thermal emission or scattered light can then be spatially resolved with infrared or optical imaging (Wyatt 2008). HD 106906 is an ideal example of a system with an exterior perturber, as it harbors a confirmed exterior companion with a model-atmosphere-derived mass of 11 MJup at a projected separation of 650 AU outside a resolved disk (Bailey et al. 2014). Scattered-light imaging of the disk with the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI), the Hubble Space Telescope's Advanced Camera for Surverys (HST/ACS), and SPHERE has revealed that the disk is a ring viewed nearly edge-on (inclination ∼ 85◦), with a inner region cleared of small dust grains (Kalas et al. 2015; Lagrange et al. 2016). These observations noted four major features of the disk morphology and system geometry: 1. The position angle (PA) of the disk is oriented ∼ 21◦ counterclockwise from the position angle of the companion, which constrains the orbit of the companion relative to the disk. 2. The inner disk has little to no vertical extension. While Kalas et al. (2015) tentatively suggested the presence of a "warp" in the disk's vertical structure on the west side of the disk, this warp was not confirmed by Lagrange et al. (2016). This lack of vertical extension indicates that the inclinations of the disk particles have not been excited. 3. The east side of the disk is brighter than the west side in GPI and SPHERE near-infrared images. 4. Kalas et al. (2015) observed a faint extension on the west side of the disk out to nearly 500 au, but only diffuse emission on the east side . These latter two features indicate that the disk may be an eccentric ring, which will exhibit a brightness asymmetry towards the pericenter side ("pericenter glow", Wyatt et al. 1999) and a faint, extended tail towards the apocenter side (Lee & Chiang 2016). We modeled the HD 106906 system to demonstrate that the observed exterior companion can shape the disk into a flat, eccentric ring, and that all four of these morphological features can be reproduced without invoking the presence of a second companion. We also used the observed features and asymmetries of the HD 106906 disk to place constraints on the orbit of the observed companion. In Section 2, we describe the collisional and dynamical simulations we performed of the parent bodies and dust grains in the HD 106906 disk. In Section 3, we present the simulated brightness images produced by our simulations for comparison with observations. In 4, we discuss the implication of these results and show how they can be used to constrain the orbit of HD 106906b. In Section 5, we summarize our conclusions and suggest opportunities for future work. -- 3 -- 2. Simulations Given that collisions between particles in a disk with sufficiently high optical depth (LIR/L∗ ≈ 1.4 × 10−3 for HD 106906 (Chen et al. 2011)) will both produce the small grains seen in obser- vations and may affect the dynamics of the disk, we simulated the HD 106906 system using the Superparticle-Method Algorithm for Collisions in Kuiper belts and debris disks (SMACK, Nesvold et al. 2013). We then recorded the dust-producing encounters between parent bodies, simulated the orbits of the generated dust grains under the influence of radiative forces following the method of Lee & Chiang (2016), then simulated the surface brightness of the dust using a Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase function (Henyey & Greenstein 1941). 2.1. SMACK Model SMACK is based on the N -body integrator REBOUND (Rein & Liu 2012), but approximates each particle in the integrator as a collection of bodies with a range of sizes between 1 mm and 10 cm in diameter, traveling on the same orbit. This group of bodies is called a "superparticle" and is characterized by a size distribution, position, and velocity. The superparticles act as test particles in the integration, and orbit the star under the influence of perturbations by any planets in the simulation. Each superparticle is approximated as a sphere with some finite radius. When REBOUND detects that two superparticles are overlapping in space, SMACK statistically calcu- lates the number of bodies within each superparticle that will collide and fragment, removes these bodies from their size distributions, and redistributes the fragments. SMACK also corrects the trajectories of the parent superparticles to conserve angular momentum and energy, compensating for the kinetic energy lost to fragmentation. The parameters for the SMACK simulation of the HD 106906 system described in this work are listed in Table 1. The masses of the star and companion were 2.5 M(cid:12) and 11 MJup, respectively. The initial semi-major axis range of 65 − 85 au for the 10,000 superparticles in the simulated disk was chosen in anticipation that the disk would spread during the 15 Myr course of the simulation. The radial extent of the HD 106906 ring as observed in scattered-light imaging is ∼ 50 − 100 au (Kalas et al. 2015; Lagrange et al. 2016). The orbital parameters of the companion were chosen such that the gravitational perturbations from the companion would excite the eccentricities of the disk particles without causing a vertical extension of the disk on the timescale of the system's age, and such that the simulated companion's orbit could reproduce the position of the observed companion. -- 4 -- 2.2. SMACK vs. Collisionless N -Body To measure the effects of collisions on the dynamics of the disk particles, we also performed a collisionless N -body simulation of the disk using the Wisdom-Holman integrator of REBOUND with collision detection and resolution turned off. The collisionless N -body simulation used the same companion and disk parameters as the SMACK simulation (Table 1), with 10,000 test particles to represent the disk. Figure 1 shows the time evolution of the simulated disk's average eccentricity, inclination, longitude of nodes, and argument of pericenter. Although there are small variations, most notably in the average eccentricity, between the SMACK simulation and the collisionless N - body simulation, the maximum difference for each parameter is ≤ 10%, indicating that fragmenting collisions have a minimal effect on the dynamics of this system. 2.3. Dust Model To generate the simulated images of the dust grains in the HD 106906 system, we adapted the method of Lee & Chiang (2016), which extended the dust orbit calculations of Wyatt et al. (1999) to include estimates of the surface brightness. Our SMACK simulation output the locations of dust-producing collisions during the 15 Myr simulation, as well as the orbits of the parent bodies producing the dust. We selected the first 104 dust production events occurring after time t = 5 Myr. For each dust production event, we generated 10 dust orbits, each with a β value randomly chosen from a power-law distribution with index 3/2 (where β ≈ Frad/Fgrav represents the ratio of the radiative and gravitational forces acting on a dust grain). The maximum possible value for the β value was set by the parent body's orbit: βmax = 1 − ep 2(1 + ep cos fp) , (1) where ep and fp are the parent body's eccentricity and true anomaly, respectively. The semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, and argument of pericenter ω of each dust orbit are given by the parent Table 1: Initial conditions of the disk and companion for the simulation. Initial Disk Values HD 106906b 700 0.7 8.5 90 −90 -- -- Parameter Semi-Major Axis (au) Eccentricity Inclination (◦) Longitude of Nodes (◦) Argument of Pericenter (◦) Optical depth Density (g cm−3) 65 − 85 0 − 0.01 0 − 0.29 0 − 360 0 − 360 1.4 × 10−3 1.0 -- 5 -- Fig. 1. -- Time evolution of the average eccentricity, inclination, longitude of nodes, and argument of pericenter for disk particles in the SMACK and collisionless N -body simulations described in this section. The dashed lines indicate the standard deviation of each orbital element for each simulation. The variation between the two simulations is ≤ 10% for each orbital element's average . 02468101214Time (Myr)0.00.10.20.30.4Eccentricity02468101214Time (Myr)05101520Inclination (deg)02468101214050100150200Long. of Nodes (deg)02468101214050100150200250Arg. of Pericenter (deg)N−body Avg SMACK AvgN−body SDSMACK SDbody's orbit (specifically ap, ep, and fp) and the β value assigned to the orbit: -- 6 -- a = 1 − e2 (cid:113) e = ω = ωp + arctan p)(1 − β) ap(1 − e2 p − 2β(1 − ep cos fp) (cid:19) (cid:18) β sin fp e2 p + 2βep cos fp + β2 1 − β ep + β cos fp , , (2) (3) (4) . The inclination i and longitude of nodes Ω of the dust orbit was set to be equal to the corresponding values for the parent body, ip and Ωp, respectively. For each dust orbit, we generated 10 dust grains, and assigned each a mean anomaly selected randomly from a uniform distribution between 0 and 360◦. Thus, each dust production event produced 100 final dust grain locations. After constructing the dust population from the SMACK results, we simulated the surface brightness of the dust using φ(g, θ)/β2r2, where φ(g, θ) is the Henyey-Greenstein scattering phase function with asymmetry parameter g, θ is the angle between the dust grain and the observer's line-of-sight (with the vertex at the star), and r is the distance between the dust grain and the star. Following Lee & Chiang (2016), we used g = 0.5. 3. Results Figure 2 shows the simulated brightness of the dust produced by SMACK during after 5 Myr, scaled for comparison with Figure 1 of Lagrange et al. (2016) and Figure 3 of Kalas et al. (2015). The SMACK-produced dust population exhibits a brightness asymmetry at pericenter (Figure 2a) as well as a faint extension on the apocenter side (Figure 2b), although it does not reproduce the diffuse emission on the eastern side of the disk suggested by Kalas et al. (2015). The scattered-light brightness enhancement at pericenter is a signature of an eccentric ring (Wyatt et al. 1999; Pan et al. 2016), indicating that the orbits of the disk particles in the simulation, initially assigned eccentricities < 0.01 and random longitudes of node and arguments of pericenter, have become more eccentric and apsidally aligned due to their secular resonance with the distant companion (Li et al. 2014, see Section 4). The extended "tail" seen on the apocenter side of the disk is also a signature of an eccentric ring, in which high-eccentricity dust grains are produced near the ring's pericenter on apsidally aligned orbits, and then observed as they travel to and from their distant apocenters (Lee & Chiang 2016). The relatively low inclination of the companion relative to the disk results in a flat, narrow ring, with no appreciable vertical extension after 5 Myr, and the observed relative inclination between the companion and the disk (∼ 21◦) is reproduced by our choice of 5◦ relative inclination and the 85◦ viewing inclination. The observed exterior companion is therefore able to reproduce four of the observed morphological features of the disk with no requirement for a second companion. -- 7 -- Fig. 2. -- Simulated surface brightness of the SMACK-simulated dust ring after 5 Myr of pertur- bations from a companion at semi-major axis apl = 700 au, eccentricity epl = 0.7, and inclination ipl = 8.5◦. The viewing inclination is ∼ 5◦ from edge-on and the pericenter side of the disk is towards the east. (a) The field of view and simulated coronagraphic mask were chosen for compar- ison with Figure 1 of the Lagrange et al. (2016). Pericenter glow causes the east side of the disk to appear brighter. (b) The field of view and simulated coronagraphic mask were chosen for compar- ison with Figure 3 of Kalas et al. (2015). The grey line in (b) indicates the orbit of the simulated companion, while the white dot (highlighted by the arrow) indicates the observed location of the companion. -- 8 -- The physical mechanisms described above allow us to place constraints on the orbit of the companion. The relative position angle of the companion and the disk's line of nodes on the sky is related to the inclination of the companion's orbit relative to the plane of the disk, but this relationship in complex and also depends on the longitude of nodes and argument of pericenter of the companion relative to the disk. In addition, these angles change with time, as the gravita- tional perturbations from the companion cause the orbits of the disk particles to precess coherently together (see Section 4). Instead, we can use the disk's morphology to place constraints on the companion's orbit. For example, the pericenter of the companion cannot be too close to the outer edge of the disk or the companion's chaotic zone will truncate the disk. As a rough estimate, we can calculate the relationship between the radius of the inner edge of the companion's chaotic zone, rz, and the companion's pericenter distance, rpl, using the analytically derived classical chaotic zone relationship for circular orbits (Wisdom 1980), (rpl − rz)/rpl = 1.3µ2/7, where µ is the companion- to-star mass ratio. If we set the inner edge of the companion's chaotic zone to be the outer edge of the disk, rz = 100 au, the minimum pericenter location for the companion is rpl ≈ 138 au. This constraint contains a degeneracy between the companion's eccentricity and semi-major axis, apl(1 − epl) (cid:38) 138 au. There also exists an upper limit on the companion's semi-major axis, as the secular timescale must be less than the age of the system for the companion's secular perturbations to produce the observed asymmetries in the disk. If we constrain the secular timescale to be at least 10 Myr, the (cid:46) 661 au (see Section companion's semi-major axis and eccentricity are constrained by apl 4). 1 − e2 (cid:113) pl We can use the disk's vertical extent to place an upper limit on the mutual inclination between the plane of the disk and the companion's orbit. We ran three collisionless N -body simulations of the disk perturbed by a 11 MJup companion with the same orbital parameters as in the SMACK simulation, but varying the mutual inclination between the companion and disk to 8.5◦, 20◦, or 30◦. The N -body particles represented the parent bodies in the disk. We simulated the production of dust grains by generating and recording one dust orbit matching the location and velocity of each parent body every 10 years during each simulation. We then generated 100 dust grains from each dust orbit and produced simulated brightness images using the procedure described in Section 2.3. Figure 3 shows the simulated brightness of each disk, viewed 5◦ from edge-on, at 10 Myr, as well as the location of the parent bodies in each disk. Perturbations from a higher companion inclination produce a larger vertical extent in the disk. Resolved images of the system show a flat disk, indicating that the companion's inclination relative to the disk must be i (cid:46) 20◦. Our SMACK simulation demonstrates that the observed exterior companion can excite the necessary eccentricities in the ring within the age of the system without creating a significant vertical extension if the companion has a moderately large eccentricity (e ≈ 0.7) but a small inclination (i ≈ 8.5◦). Given these orbital parameters, the companion's semi-major axis would need to be ∼ 700 AU to match its observed projected position. -- 9 -- Fig. 3. -- Left: Locations of the parent bodies in each disk at 10 Myr. Each disk is inclined 5◦ from edge-on and perturbed by a companion with inclination 8.5◦, 20◦, or 30◦. Right: Corresponding simulated surface brightness maps of each disk. The vertical extent of the disk increases with companion inclination, as well as with time. -- 10 -- 4. Constraining the Companion's Orbit At time t = 0 yr in our SMACK simulation of the HD 106906 system, the disk particles have eccentricity ≤ 0.01 and longitudes of node and arguments of pericenter distributed randomly be- tween 0 − 360◦, forming a circular belt. By time t = 5 Myr, gravitational perturbations from the companion have increased the average eccentricity of the particles to ∼ 0.18 (Fig. 4). Increasing the average eccentricity of the particles alone would only produce a broader circular disk, but the secular resonance formed with the companion also cause the particles' longitudes of node and argu- ments of pericenter to converge. In other words, the orbits of the disk particles begin to apsidally align, producing a coherent eccentric ring. Fig. 4 illustrates this with plots of the time evolution over 50 Myr of the longitudes of node, arguments of pericenter, eccentricities, and inclinations of ten randomly chosen disk particles in a collisionless N -body simulation with the same system pa- rameters as the SMACK simulation described in Table 1. We used 10,000 particles to represent the disk, simulated with the Wisdom-Holman integrator in REBOUND with collisions turned off. The orbits of these ten randomly chosen particles become roughly apsidally aligned within ∼ 4 Myr. This behavior is consistent with the hierarchical nearly coplanar secular evolution, investigated in Li et al. (2014), which showed that the resonance angle for low-inclination companions is the sum of the longitude of nodes (Ω) and the argument of pericenter (ω). The test particles, although they were initially assigned random values of Ω and ω, are captured into resonance with the companion, which both pumps up their eccentricity and aligns their orbits, forming an eccentric disk. The secular precession timescale of particle in the disk due an external planetary-mass com- panion with mass Mpl and eccentricity epl is defined as (Naoz 2016) tsec ∼ 16 30π M∗ + Mpl Mpl P 2 pl Pd (1 − e2 pl)3/2, (5) where Ppl is the companion's period around the star (mass M∗) and Pd is the period of particles in the disk. The eccentric companion induces gravitational perturbations which result in the disk particles orbiting in a resonance, where the disk particles' longitude of pericenter = ω + Ω is the resonant angle (Li et al. 2014). The precession timescale can be used to place an upper limit on the companion's semi-major axis. In order to perturb the entire disk (down to its inner edge at ∼ 50 au) within the age of the system tage ≈ 10 Myr, the inner edge of the disk must have experienced at least one half-cycle of 2 tsec (cid:46) tage. Using a stellar mass secular perturbation, so the secular timescale at 50 au must be 1 of 2.5 M(cid:12) and a companion mass of 11 MJup, and Equation 5, this yields (cid:113) apl 1 − e2 pl (cid:46) 661 au. (6) -- 11 -- Fig. 4. -- Time evolution of the argument of pericenter, longitude of nodes, eccentricity, and inclination of ten randomly chosen particles in a collisionless N -body simulation over 50 Myr. The dashed grey line in each plot indicates the standard deviation of the given orbital element for all the particles in the disk. The rough convergence of the argument of pericenter and longitude of nodes produces a coherent ring of particles. The eccentricities and inclinations of the particles oscillate with time. 01020304050Time (Myr)0100200300Argument of Pericenter (o)01020304050Time (Myr)0100200300Longitude of Nodes (o)010203040500.00.10.20.30.4Eccentricity0102030405005101520Inclination (o) -- 12 -- 5. Summary and Conclusions We have shown that the observed exterior companion in the HD 106906 system can shape the system's debris disk into a flat, eccentric, dust-producing ring and reproduce its observed morphological features and asymmetries. Our SMACK simulations also allow us to place constraints on the orbit of the companion using the morphology of the disk. While we have demonstrated that the perturbations from the observed, exterior companion can excite eccentricities in the HD 106906 ring, alternative mechanisms for eccentricity excitation also exist. For example, a second companion on an eccentric orbit interior to the debris ring could force an eccentricity on the ring. Future simulations investigating the plausibility of this scenario may be able to constrain the orbit of the outer companion based on stability requirements. Constraining the orbit of HD 106906b could have implications for its formation scenario. Prior to the publication of resolved images of the disk, it was suggested (using N -body simulations) that the companion formed interior to the disk and was scattered onto a highly eccentric orbit (J´ılkov´a & Portegies Zwart 2015). This study concluded that the disk can survive perturbations by a companion with an apocenter distance of 650 au and a pericenter distance interior to the disk if the companion's inclination is (cid:38) 10◦. However, this resulted in a significantly vertically perturbed disk by 10 Myr, regardless of the companion's inclination. Our simulations indicate that a companion with an orbit completely exterior to the disk can reproduce the observed asymmetries without vertically extending the disk, supporting the scenario in which the companion formed in situ. A more thorough exploration of the parameter space may be able to place further constraints on the companion's orbit using the observed geometry of the system. The methodology we pre- sented in this work can also be generalized to other debris disk observations to explore whether their observed asymmetries could be explained by the presence of an undetected distant exterior com- panion, and investigate how the morphology of these disks could constrain the orbit of their exterior perturbers. Other debris disk systems with exterior massive perturbers are likely not uncommon; surveys indicate that ∼ 25% of debris disks exist in binary or triple star systems (Rodriguez & Zuckerman 2012). Planetary-mass exterior companions like HD 106906b may be responsible for the asymmetries in observed debris disks such as HD 61005 (Hines et al. 2007; Esposito et al. 2016) and HD 15115 (Rodigas et al. 2012; Schneider et al. 2014; MacGregor et al. 2015), for example. Numerical simulations were performed on the Memex High Performance Computing Cluster at the Carnegie Institution for Science. Erika Nesvold was supported by the Carnegie DTM Postdoc- toral Fellowship. Smadar Naoz acknowledges partial support from a Sloan Foundation Fellowship. The authors wish to thank the anonymous referee for a prompt and helpful review. -- 13 -- REFERENCES Bailey, V. P., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 780, L4 Chen, C. H., Mamajek, E. E., Bitner, M. A., Pecaut, M., Su, K. Y. L., & Weinberger, A. J. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 738, 122 Chiang, E. I., Kite, E. S., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 693, 734 Cotten, T. H., & Song, I. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 225, 15 Esposito, T. M., et al. 2016, The Astronomical Journal, 152, 85 Henyey, L. C., & Greenstein, J. L. 1941, The Astrophysical Journal, 93, 70 Hines, D. C., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 671, L165 J´ılkov´a, L., & Portegies Zwart, S. F. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 451, 804 Kalas, P. G., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 814, 32 Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 586, L8 Lee, E. J., & Chiang, E. I. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Li, G., Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., & Loeb, A. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 785, 116 MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., & Hughes, A. M. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 801, 59 Matthews, B. C., Krivov, A. V., Wyatt, M. C., Bryden, G., & Eiroa, C. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, 521 -- 544 Mawet, D., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 811, 103 Mouillet, D., Larwood, J. D., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Lagrange, A.-M. 1997, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 292, 896 Naoz, S. 2016, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics Nesvold, E. R., & Kuchner, M. J. 2015a, The Astrophysical Journal, 815, 61 -- . 2015b, The Astrophysical Journal, 798, 83 Nesvold, E. R., Kuchner, M. J., Rein, H., & Pan, M. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 777, 144 Nesvold, E. R., Naoz, S., Vican, L., & Farr, W. M. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 826, 19 -- 14 -- Pan, M., Nesvold, E. R., & Kuchner, M. J. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 81 Pearce, T. D., & Wyatt, M. C. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 3329 Rein, H., & Liu, S. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 537, A128 Rodigas, T. J., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 752, 57 Rodriguez, D. R., & Zuckerman, B. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 745, 147 Schneider, G., et al. 2014, The Astronomical Journal, 148, 59 Th´ebault, P., Kral, Q., & Ertel, S. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 547, A92 Wisdom, J. 1980, The Astronomical Journal, 85, 1122 Wyatt, M. C. 2008, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 46, 339 Wyatt, M. C., Dermott, S. F., Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Grogan, K., Holmes, E. K., & Pina, R. K. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 527, 918 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1004.1091	1	1004	2010-04-07T13:47:06	The Potato Radius: a Lower Minimum Size for Dwarf Planets	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.geo-ph" ]	Gravitational and electronic forces produce a correlation between the mass and shape of objects in the universe. For example, at an average radius of ~ 200 km - 300 km, the icy moons and rocky asteroids of our Solar System transition from a rounded potato shape to a sphere. We derive this potato-to-sphere transition radius -- or "potato radius" -- from first principles. Using the empirical potato radii of asteroids and icy moons, we derive a constraint on the yield strength of these bodies during their formative years when their shapes were determined. Our proposed ~ 200 km potato radius for icy moons would substantially increase the number of trans-Neptunian objects classified as dwarf planets.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Potato Radius: a Lower Minimum Size for Dwarf Planets Charles H. Lineweaver & Marc Norman Planetary Science Institute of the Research School of Earth Sciences and the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Summary: Gravitational and electronic forces produce a correlation between the mass and shape of objects in the universe. For example, at an average radius of ~ 200 km – 300 km, the icy moons and rocky asteroids of our Solar System transition from a rounded potato shape to a sphere. We derive this potato-to-sphere transition radius -- or “potato radius” -- from first principles. Using the empirical potato radii of asteroids and icy moons, we derive a constraint on the yield strength of these bodies during their formative years when their shapes were determined. Our proposed ~200 km potato radius for icy moons would substantially increase the number of trans-Neptunian objects classified as “dwarf planets”. Keywords: planetary science, gravity, accretion, angular momentum, yield strength. In press, 2010, Australian Space Science Conference Series: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Space Science Conference, eds W. Short & I. Cairns, National Space Society of Australia Dust, Potatoes, Spheres, Disks and Halos Fig. 1: Objects in the universe take on five basic shapes -- dust, potatoes, spheres, disks and halos. These shapes are highly correlated with the size of the object, which increases from left to right. These shapes can be understood in terms of the fundamental forces that dominate the relevant size scales. Each column is arranged with the largest objects on top and the smallest on the bottom. From top to bottom the dust images are i) dust found in our RSES lab, ii) lunar dust, ii) interplanetary dust. Potatoes are i) Saturn’s moon Hyperion, and asteroids: ii) Ida and iii) Eros. Spheres are: i) the Sun, ii) Earth and iii) Moon. Disks are i) the galactic disk of M104, the Sombrero Galaxy, ii) the protoplanetary disk accreting material onto the central star HH-30 and iii) the rings of Saturn. Halos are i) the giant elliptical galaxy M87, ii) the bulge of the edge-on spiral galaxy NGC 4565 and iii) globular cluster, M80.   A quick survey of the shapes of objects in the universe yields five basic types: irregular dust, rounded potatoes, spheres, disks and halos. Figure 1 shows this interesting series from small irregular objects on the left, to large spherical objects on the right. These five basic shapes are strongly size-dependent and can be understood as a transition from small objects with shapes dominated by electronic forces to large objects with shapes dominated by gravitational forces (spheres). Specific angular momentum also plays a role in forming disks. After briefly reviewing the physics of these shapes (cf. Weisskopf 1975), we focus on the transition most relevant to planetary science, i.e., the potato-to-sphere transition where the rounded potato- producing compromise between electronic forces and gravity begins to be dominated by sphere-producing gravity. This transition marks the boundary of hydrostatic equilibrium used in the IAU definition of “dwarf planet”. Dust, Potatoes and Spheres The gravitational force on a body of mass m, at a distance r from a larger body of mass M is: F= GMm/r2. This force is proportional to the amount of mass M. Electrostatic forces are also a 1/r2 force. However, unlike mass, charges can be positive or negative and form charge- neutral objects. Thus the strength of the electronic force between atoms and molecules is not proportional to the amount of material. The smallest objects with the smallest M, have the least self-gravity and are dominated by electronic forces. These electronic forces determine the wide variety of shapes of relatively small objects (average radius R < ~ few km), such as molecules, dust, crystals, and trees. The complex shapes of life forms are controlled by electronic forces (Thompson 1917). These small complex shapes are represented by dust in the first column of Fig. 1. In the size range of solid objects between ~few km and ~200 km, self-gravity begins to be important and objects take on a rounded potato shape determined by a compromise between gravitational forces and electronic forces. On the small side, gravity plays less of a role and its rounding effect is not apparent. As the size increases, gravity becomes more important and objects get more rounded. At R < few km, objects are irregularly-shaped-electronic-force- dominated. In the potato regime, (few km < R < ~200-300 km, Fig. 1, second column,), there is a smooth size-dependent transition to more and more rounded potatoes until the upper limit of this potato regime (Rpot ~200-300 km), there is a transition from potatoes to spheres as gravity begins to dominate (Fig. 2). Finally, larger solid objects with R > ~ 200 – 300 km are gravity-dominated spheres (Fig. 1, third column). As shown below, the potato radius depends on the density ρ and the yield strength σy of the material (Eq. 10). Gravitational Collapse, Disks and Halos Gravity alone cannot make things collapse. To collapse “gravitationally”, material has to get rid of energy and angular momentum. Only when dissipative structures and/or processes (accretion disks, viscosity, friction, magnetic breaking, inelastic collisions, dynamical friction) act to export energy and angular momentum, can an object collapse. For example, in order for a molecular cloud to collapse into a star with planets, both energy and angular momentum have to be exported efficiently. The vorticity in molecular clouds is much too large for clumps to fall together into a star (Larson 2010). If both energy (E) and angular momentum (L) are exported efficiently, the object (if large enough) will collapse into a sphere (moons, planets, stars, black holes, Fig. 1, third column). The Sun for example was able, through magnetic breaking, to transfer its spin angular momentum to the orbital angular   2  momentum of the protoplanetary disk. If dissipative processes have been able to export energy, but not as much angular momentum, the ratio of angular momentum to energy, L/E, increases. The result is a disk (e.g. plane of the Milky Way, ecliptic plane of our Solar System, protoplanetary accretion disks and the rings of Saturn, see Fig. 1, fourth column). Protoplanetary accretion disks are hot and export energy efficiently, but angular momentum can only be transported outwards when the gaseous disk is massive enough to make mass (gas, dust, planetesimals, planets) migrate. Turbulence, magnetic fields and viscosity in the disk allowed angular momentum to be transferred. As the protoplanetary disk became more tenuous, and disappeared, friction and viscosity and the associated ability to transport angular momentum decreased, leaving the angular momentum stranded in the planets. Without a dissipative mechanism to export it, a high L/E and disky shape resulted. Only the dynamical friction of the scattering of planetesimals could transport some residual angular momentum and led to a bit of collapse or reconfiguration of the disky system (see Gomez et al 2005). In summary, planets exist because angular momentum is conserved and gets stranded (Stevenson 2004). Based on this idea, Hoyle (1960) suggested (see also Huang 1969) that stellar spin be used as a proxy to detect other planetary systems. If a star is spinning with an angular momentum consistent with the specific angular momentum of the molecular clouds from which it formed, then it could not have planets. If a star is spinning at a much lower rate, then it had to have exported that angular momentum through a disk and presumably into planets. Most stars have specific angular momenta at least an order of magnitude below the specific angular momenta of the clumps in molecular clouds (Larsen 2010). When dissipative processes are inefficient at exporting both energy and angular momentum, energy and angular momentum are roughly conserved. If neither energy nor angular momentum can be exported, the body becomes and stays virialized (globular clusters, elliptical galaxies) as a roughly spherical distribution or halo. This happens when the system is too diffuse to have an accretion disk. L/E remains at its initial value. Kinetic and potential energy sloshes back and forth between the discrete components -- galaxies in galactic clusters and stars in the bulges of spiral galaxies and in globular clusters (Fig. 1, fifth column). Besides the influence of L/E, there are a few other effects that confound the simple relationship between size (~mass) and sphericity. Surface tension, erosion and impact fragmentation play roles in making objects respectively, spherical, rounded and irregular. Chondrules inside chondritic meteorites are spheres for the same reason bubbles are spheres: surface tension, not gravity. Erosion from wind and water can make intrinsically irregular rocks into rounded grains of sand and rounded pebbles in stream beds. Asteroids and pebbles in outer space with R < ~few km can be potatoid (rather than irregular) due to erosion from small impacts and weathering - not from a compromise between electronic forces and gravity. Ignoring these complications, the five shapes in Figure 1 are the result of non-mass-dependent electronic forces, mass-dependent gravitational forces and the varying abilities of dissipative structures to export energy and angular momentum (the L/E-dependence of disks and halos). Evidence for the Potato Radius The definition of planet set on 24 August 2006 under Resolution B5 of the 26th General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union states that, in the Solar System a planet is a celestial body that:   (a) Asteroids Potatoes become Spheres at r > ~300 km Ceres 475 Pallas 275 Vesta 265 Juno 115 (b) Mathilde 53 Ida 25 Eros 17 Gaspra 12 Icy Moons Potatoes become Spheres at r > ~200 km Enceladus 251 Miranda 235 Mimas 198 Thebe Metis Calypso Janus Hyperion 50 25 11 95 140 Fig. 2: The potato-to-sphere transition occurs when the mean radius of an asteroid is ~ 300 km and when the mean radius of an icy moon is ~ 200 km. This does not reflect the 1/ρ dependence of the potato radius (Eq. 10) and thus can give us information about the yield strength during the formation of these objects. This potato-to-sphere transition radius depends on the trade-off between gravity and the yield strength of the rocky and icy material.   4  For the purpose of Trans-Neptunian Object classification, the Rpot ~ 200 km of icy moons is most relevant. 1. is in orbit around the Sun, 2. has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, 3. has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. Resolution B5 also defines a dwarf planet in the same way as it does a planet except that a dwarf planet has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. Here we focus on what it means to have “sufficient mass to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape”. In other words, we derive how much self-gravity is needed to attain internal overburden pressures equal to the yield strengths of the material, so that rounded, potato-shaped bodies become spheres. We call the average radius of a body that has accreted enough material to make this potato-to-sphere transition, the potato radius, “Rpot ”. This radius is interesting because it is the limiting radius between (cf. bodies” system solar “small and planets dwarf en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_planet). When asteroids or moons, or other celestial bodies are imaged by high angular resolution instruments, and the point spread function of the instrument is smaller than the angle subtended by the body, the shape of the body can be resolved. When this is possible, we see the pattern shown in Figure 2, which shows clearly that solid objects that have accreted enough mass to have an average radius larger than ~ 200 - 300 km are spheres. More specifically, for asteroids (Fig. 2a) Rpot ~ 300 km and for icy moons (Fig. 2b) Rpot ~ 200 km. In the next section we will derive this empirical result. Derivation of the Potato Radius One could begin, as the author did initially, by setting the gravitational acceleration at the surface of a body equal to the acceleration needed to undo the electronic bonds. But this is not what we want since it is equating surface gravity with the force needed to crush rocks. The Earth is spherical but its gravitational pull is not so strong that it crushes rock at the surface. One has to go down ~10 or ~20 kilometers before the overburden pressure can do that. To our knowledge, the published derivation of something most analogous to the potato radius is in Chap. 1.2.1 of Stevenson (2009). Focusing on energy (not force or pressure) the electronic bond energy of ~ 1 eV is set equal to the gravitational energy ~ GMµ/R where µ is the mass of the particle in question and R is the radius of the object. The result is a radius of a few thousand kilometers for a rocky body and ~ 1000 km for an icy body. This was meant to be only an order of magnitude calculation. We try to improve on it below. Thomas (1989) has empirically analysed the topology of small satellites. He reports that icy satellites with a mean radius of ~ 150 km are irregularly shaped, with no tread seen in the shape of objects with a mean radius below ~ 150 km. He also notes a gradual transition of the shape of rocky satellites from irregular to ellipsoidal. Basri & Brown (2006) report a potato radius of approximately 400 km for objects with the yield strength and density of stony meteorites. This is consistent with but slightly larger than our ~ 300 km estimate based on Fig. 2a. The difference may depend on whether one is referring to current yield strengths or to the lower yield strengths due to the higher temperatures in the early formative period when   asteroid shapes were set. ) = #y 2 . Consider a roughly spherical body of average radius R, with an overburden pressure P at a given radius r < R, from the centre. If we want the body to be a sphere, at some radius r we need the overburden pressure to exceed the compressive yield strength of the rock. That is, the pressure must be sufficiently high such that the rock is in the ductile regime, so that it deforms plastically (or brittlely), not elastically. This r needs to be close enough to the surface to guarantee that the material above it, when accumulated randomly, does not destroy the sphericity. We set the overburden pressure P at radius r equal to the compressive strength of the material, σy. A simple plausible criterion for the potato radius will be when the gravitational overburden pressure half way through the body begins to exceed the compressive strength of the material of the body, P ( r " R The overburden pressure at a radius r inside a roughly spherical body of radius R and density ρ is (e.g. Ryan and Melosh 1998 Eq. 5, Stevenson 2009, Section 3.2), 2π P ( r) = 3 Gρ2 (R 2 − r 2 ) At the surface, when r = R, there is no overburden and no pressure. When r = 0, Eq. (2) gives the central pressure of the body. Combining Eqs. (1) and (2) yields the potato radius, Rpot 2" 3 % G#2 R pot ’ & ( * + ,y ) R pot 2 (2) (1) . 2 $ ( ) 2 . (3) Notice that as the density goes up, the potato radius goes down, and that as the compressive strength goes up, the potato radius goes up. For simplicity we can write this as, where A= sqrt(2/π) is a forefactor that depends on our plausible criterion in Eq. (1) that r = R/2. We plug in values for the gravitational constant G, and a typical density for asteroids ρ = 2.5 g/cm3. The compressive strength (= pressure needed to make material plastically deform) of the typical silicate mantle of a rocky body such as an asteroid is σy ~ 10 MPa. With these values we obtain a scaling relationship and a potato radius of the order observed,   6  Solving for Rpot yields, R pot " & 2 #y ( $ G %2 ’ 2 1 ) + * . R pot " A % #y ’ G $2 & 2 1 ( * ) (4) (5) ! € ! ! ! ! R pot " 130 km #y + - - - % $ - & ’ 2.5g / cm 3 , 10MPa 1 / 2 . 0 0 0 0 / 2 ( ) * . (6) We can make this simple derivation a bit more realistic. For an icy or rocky body to become spherical as its radius increases, there must be horizontal flows in plastically deforming material driven by an anisotropic pressure that creates a pressure differential or deviatoric stress, that is greater than the yield stress of the material. In other words, differential pressure seems more relevant than just pressure. Consider the non-spherical potato in Figure 3 with a bump at 2 o’clock. At a radius r under the bump, the overburden pressure is larger than it is at the same radius r, that is not under the bump. There is a pressure differential ΔP = Pbump(r) - P (r). Applying Eq. (2) at two different places (but at the same r), this pressure differential or differential stress (Durham and Stern 2001) is, "P = 2# 3 [ ( G$2 Rbump 2 % r 2 ) % R 2 % r 2 ( ) ] . (7) ! Figure 3. A potato approximated as a sphere with a bump. equal to the yield strength σy of the material and Setting the differential pressure "P inserting Rbump = R + ΔR = f R, (where f is a sphericity parameter) yields,   ! 2$ [ ] f 2 & 1 G%2R 2 3 . "y # If we set the degree of sphericity of the potato-to-sphere transition such that the axis of the body along its longest axis is no more than 10% longer than its average radius, we have f = 1.1. We can then solve Eq. (8) for the potato radius, (8) R pot " B % #y ’ G $2 & 2 1 ( * ) . (9) This is the same equation as Eq. (5) but here the forefactor B = sqrt(1/0.44). Thus Eq. (9) gives a potato radius B/A ~ 2 times bigger than Eq. (6). Eq (9) yields Rpot ~ 240 km. Thus, our more realistic differential pressure considerations allow us to replace Eq. (6) with:  σy 10 MPa  R pot ≈ 240 km    ρ2.5g / cm 3     2    1 / 2       (10) where we still have the scaling law Rpot ~ 1/ρ. The densities of the asteroids in Fig. 2a in units of g/cm3 are respectively (from left to right) 2, 2.8, 3.4, 2.1 (for the top row) and 3, 1.3, 2.6, 2.7, 2.7 (for the bottom row). Thus the range is 1.5 – 3.5 and the average is ~ 2.5. The densities of the icy moons in Fig. 2b are respectively (from left to right) 1.6, 1.2, 1.2 1 (for the top row) and 0.6, 0.6, 0.9, 0.9 and unknown (for the bottom row). Thus the range is ~ 0.5 to 1.5 and the average is ~ 1.0 for these icy moons. Thus the ratio of the average densities is, # "asteroid % "ice $ 2 & ( ’ = 2.5 2 ) 6 . (11) (12) We can then conclude from Eq. (10) that, with similar compressive strengths, the Rpot of icy moons would be ~ 2.5 times larger than the Rpot of asteroids. However, we can see from Fig. 2 that this is not the case. Instead we have, Rpot (asteroids) / Rpot (icy moons) ~ 300 km / 200 km From this and Eq. (10) we find that the ratio of the yield strengths of these bodies (during their formative, hottest, shape-determining period) is, σasteroid σice   8  where we have assumed that the densities today are approximately the densities during the formative, shape-determining period. Thus, at intermediate depths in moons and asteroids of 2 300 km     200 km    ~ ρasteroid  ρice  ~ 14 (13) 2    ! ! € ! € . (14) ! radius ~200 - 300 km, the compressive strength of the rocky material out of which asteroids are made (and at the higher temperatures at which they formed) was ~ 14 times larger than the compressive strength of the material out of which the icy moons are composed. To be more precise, the ratio of the minimum compressive strengths of asteroids and moons would be ~14, since the final shapes of these bodies is determined early in their formation when temperatures were higher and yield strengths were at their minimum. In contrast, at current temperatures, typical yield strength values (Beeman et al 1988) yield, "asteroid "ice ~ 2 (16) (15) We conclude that the higher temperatures during the formative period weakened the yield strengths of the icy moons more than they weakened the yield strengths of asteroids. We can constrain the range of yield strengths based on the observed variation in the densities. Inserting Rpot = 300 km for the range of asteroid densities and Rpot = 200 km for the range of icy moon densities, Eq. (10) yields, 4 MPa < σasteroid < 30 MPa 0.4 MPa < σice < 3 MPa Yield stresses at temperatures less than ~ 1000 K are not strongly temperature dependent. According to Peierls mechanism (Karato 2008, Fig. 19.1) yield stresses increase by a factor of a few as T decreases from ~ 1000 K to ~0 K. This seems to contradict the large difference between Eqs. 13 and 14. D i s c u s s i o n a n d C o n c l u s i o n Our derivation of the ~ 200 km – 300 km potato radius is related to the fact that on Earth, earthquakes away from subduction zones are confined to depths less than ~ 30 km. This is because plastic or ductile deformation of the rocks below 30 km is enough to relieve the deviatoric stress, or pressure differences – the same ductile deformation that allow potatoes, as they increase in mass, to become spheres. There are some complexities involved with trying to decide if a body has sufficient mass to overcome its compressive strength and achieve hydrostatic equilibrium. Both mass and compressive strength are time dependent. Bodies accrete and their masses increase. During very early periods of formation (when shape is determined), bodies are heated by accretion energy and have higher levels of radiogenic heating. As temperatures decrease, compressive strengths increase. Thus compressive strengths were smaller in the past, and some bodies can have reached hydrostatic equilibrium, even if their current mass is not large enough to overcome the compressive strength of their materials at current temperatures. Another complication is that collisions can undo the effects of hydrostatic equilibrium (Farinella & Paolicchi 1982). It is possible that originally, Vesta was large enough to reach hydrostatic equilibrium but that a collision undid its sphericity. Early objects were also spinning faster and reached non-spherical (oblate spheroidal or   ellipsoidal) hydrostatic equilibrium (Chandrasekar 1969). The ability of spin to overcome compressive strength and deform a body into hydrostatic equilibrium, is time-dependent since compressive strength is time-dependent and was lower earlier on. The original draft of the 2006 IAU resolution redefined hydrostatic equilibrium shape as applying "to objects with mass above 5 × 1020 kg and diameter greater than 800 km", but this was not retained in the final draft. The IAU subsequently decided that unnamed trans- Neptunian objects (TNOs) with an absolute magnitude less than +1, which translates into a minimum radius of 419 km (Bruton 2008) would be defined as “dwarf planets” (cf. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_planet). TNOs are more similar to low density icy moons, than to rocky asteroids. Since our ~200 km potato radius for icy moons is much smaller than an absolute-magnitude-dependent 419 km limit, our number would substantially increase the number of TNOs classified as dwarf planets. We sketched out a scheme in which all objects can be crudely classified into five basic shapes, largely determined by electronic and gravitational forces as well at the L/E ratio. Then we focused on a size range relevant to planetary science. In Figure 2 we showed the empirical evidence for the “potato radius” (Rpot ~ 300 km for asteroids and Rpot ~ 200 km for icy moons) at which rounded potato-shaped objects transition into spheres. We then derived this radius as part of a scaling relation (Eq. 10) that depends on density and the yield strength of the material. This scaling relation was then used to constrain the yield strengths of asteroids and icy moons during their early formative years, when they were the hottest and their yield strengths were the weakest. The potato radius defines hydrostatic equilibrium and is used to separate “dwarf planets” from “small solar system bodies”. Our icy moon ~200 km icy moon potato radius substantially increases the number of TNOs that should be classified as dwarf planets. Acknowledgements We acknowledge Aditya Chopra for help in making Figs. 1 and 2. We thank Ian Campbell, Hugh O’Neill, Gordon Lister, Ian Jackson, Paul Tregoning, John Fitzgerald and Michele Bannister for useful discussions. References Basri, G. & Brown, M.E. (2006) Planetesimals to Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?, Ann. Rev. Earth Planetary Science, 34, 193-216 Bruton, D. 2008, www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/asteroids/sizemagnitude.html Beeman, M. et al (1988) Friction of Ice, JGR 93, 7625-7633 Chandrasekhar, S. 1969. Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium. Yale Univ.  Press, New Haven, CT.  Farinella, P. & Paolicchi, P. (1982) The Asteroids as Outcomes of Catastrophic Collisions, Icarus, 52, 409-433 Gomes, R., H. F. Levison, K. Tsiganis, A. Morbidelli (2005). Origin of the cataclysmic Late   10  Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets, Nature 435: 466. Durham, W.B. & Stern, L.A. (2001) Rheological Properties of Water Ice – Appplications to Satellites of the Outer Planets, Ann. Rev. Earth Planetary Science, 29: 295-330 Hoyle, F. (1960) Quarterly J.R.A.S, 1, 28 Huang, S. (1969) Occurrence of planetary systems in the universe as a problem in stellar astronomy Vistas in Astronomy Volume 11, 1969, Pages 217-263 Karato, S. (2008) Deformation of Earth Materials: An Introduction to the Rheology of Solid Earth, Cambridge Univ. Press Larson, R.B. (2003), The physics of star formation, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 66, issue 10, pp. 1651-1697 Larson, R.B. (2010) Angular momentum and the formation of stars and black holes, Rep. Prog. Phy. 73 014901 Ryan, E.V. and Melosh, H.J. (1998) Impact Fragmentation: From the Laboratory to Asteroids, Icarus 133, 1-24 Stevenson, D. J. (2004) Planetary Diversity, Physics Today, April 2004, p 43 Stevenson, D. J. (2009) Planetary Structure and Evolution, online book at www.gps.caltech.edu/classes/ge131 Thomas, P.C. (1989) The Shapes of Small Satellites, Icarus, 77, 248-274 Thompson, D.W. (1917) On Growth and Form, abridged edition, edt. J.T. Bonner Cambridge Univ. Press, 1961 Weisskopf, V. F. (1975) Of Atoms, Mountains, and Stars: A Study in Qualitative Physics, Science, 187, 4177, 605-612
1301.2064	2	1301	2013-06-01T02:27:00	Global drag-induced instabilities in protoplanetary disks	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.flu-dyn" ]	We use the Fokker-Planck equation and model the dispersive dynamics of solid particles in annular protoplanetary disks whose gas component is more massive than the particle phase. We model particle--gas interactions as hard sphere collisions, determine the functional form of diffusion coefficients, and show the existence of two global unstable modes in the particle phase. These modes have spiral patterns with the azimuthal wavenumber $m=1$ and rotate slowly. We show that in ring-shaped disks, the phase space density of solid particles increases linearly in time towards an accumulation point near the location of pressure maximum, while instabilities grow exponentially. Therefore, planetesimals and planetary cores can be efficiently produced near the peaks of unstable density waves. In this mechanism, particles migrating towards the accumulation point will not participate in the formation of planets, and should eventually form a debris ring like the main asteroid belt or classical Kuiper belt objects. We present the implications of global instabilities to the formation of ice giants and terrestrial planets in the solar system.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 GLOBAL DRAG-INDUCED INSTABILITIES IN PROTOPLANETARY DISKS Mir Abbas Jalali Computational Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, P.O. Box: 11155-9567, Tehran, Iran Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT We use the Fokker-Planck equation and model the dispersive dynamics of solid particles in annu- lar protoplanetary disks whose gas component is more massive than the particle phase. We model particle -- gas interactions as hard sphere collisions, determine the functional form of diffusion coeffi- cients, and show the existence of two global unstable modes in the particle phase. These modes have spiral patterns with the azimuthal wavenumber m = 1 and rotate slowly. We show that in ring-shaped disks, the phase space density of solid particles increases linearly in time towards an accumulation point near the location of pressure maximum, while instabilities grow exponentially. Therefore, plan- etesimals and planetary cores can be efficiently produced near the peaks of unstable density waves. In this mechanism, particles migrating towards the accumulation point will not participate in the formation of planets, and should eventually form a debris ring like the main asteroid belt or classical Kuiper belt objects. We present the implications of global instabilities to the formation of ice giants and terrestrial planets in the solar system. Subject headings: methods: numerical, hydrodynamics, instabilities, planets and satellites: formation, planetary systems: protoplanetary disks 1. INTRODUCTION Protoplanetary disks are multi-phase environments composed of solid particles and molecular gas. The mo- tion of particles is mainly governed by the gravitational forces of the disk material and the central star. Gas molecules feel the pressure gradient as well: for a poly- tropic isothermal gas, whose density profile monotoni- cally increases towards the central star, the pressure gra- dient ∇p is always negative. This yields a sub-Keplerian circular velocity and generates headwind on solid par- ticles that move on Keplerian orbits. Solid particles are thus expected to inspiral towards the central star. Although adhesive and electrostatic forces can enhance the clustering of micron-sized particles (Blum & Wurm 2008), centimeter- to meter-size particles seem to inspiral towards (and fall into) the central star sooner than the time scale needed for assembling planetary cores. There- fore, several collective processes like streaming instability (Youdin & Goodman 2005), turbulent vortices induced by Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (Johansen et al. 2006; Bai & Stone 2010a,b) and magnetorotational instability (Johansen et al. 2007, 2011) have been proposed to be responsible for the formation of km-scale planetesimals. The inspiraling motion of particles, however, does not globally occur in disks with non-monotonic density pro- files, which are likely to form through a combination of viscous accretion and photoevaporation by the central star (e.g., Matsuyama et al. 2003). A ring-like disk is the simplest system with non-monotonic density profile. An interesting property of such systems is that ∇p be- comes positive in regions where the density profile is ris- ing, and gas molecules move with super-Keplerian veloc- ities. Consequently, solid particles that approximately move on Keplerian orbits are accelerated by gas and migrate outwards. This means that solid particles do Electronic address: [email protected] not necessarily fall into the central star and may in- stead migrate to regions where the pressure is maxi- mum and both the head and tail winds are minimized (Haghighipour & Boss 2003). Migrations of individual particles have been well understood by solving their equations of motion in the presence of gravitational and drag forces, but we do not still know the collective effects of such migrating particles. Can they efficiently produce planetesimals and massive planetary cores? generalize the analysis In this paper, we of Jalali & Tremaine (2012, hereafter JT12) to disks that include a locally isothermal gas component, and search for global instabilities in the particle phase. Our disks are self-gravitating and the particle phase has non-zero radial velocity dispersion. The dynamics of particles is modeled by the Fokker-Planck equation, and the gas component is assumed to be in a steady-state rotation around the central star. For simplicity, we confine our study to disks with Σg/Σp ≫ 1 where Σg and Σp are the surface densi- ties of the gas and particle phases, respectively. By this assumption, the background gas component does not re- spond to the disturbances of the particle phase. We ne- glect collisions between solid particles, but those between gas molecules and solid particles are taken into account. We present our simple model of protoplanetary disks in section 2 and derive the circular velocities of solid particles and gas molecules. In section 3, we model the dispersive dynamics of particles in the context of kinetic theory, and utilize a perturbation theory in section 4 to solve the resulting Fokker-Planck equation. In section 5, we apply our theory to planet formation in the solar system, and in section 6 estimate the physical ranges of parameters for which the perturbation solutions are valid. We conclude the paper in section 7 by comparing our findings with previous works. Open problems for future studies are also discussed. 2 µ / 0 Σ 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0.01 0.1 h t v / ) c , g v - c , p v ( 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 -0.02 0.01 0.1 1 R 1 R 10 100 α = 0.023 α = 0.034 α = 0.043 10 100 Figure 1. Top: Density profile of ring-shaped disks. Bottom: Relative circular velocity of particles with respect to gas, normal- ized to the mean thermal speed of gas molecules. The values of q have been extracted from Table 1. 2. DISK MODEL We assume a two-phase medium consisting of solid par- ticles and gas molecules, and refer to them by subscripts p and g, respectively. Solid particles are assumed to be monodisperse hard spheres of mass mp and radius rp. The gas phase has the molecular mass mg, and the av- erage radius of gas molecules is rg. We work with ini- tially axisymmetric disks whose gas component has not streaming motion in the radial direction (no accretion), but particles can move on eccentric orbits. For both the particle and gas phases we use the annular ring model of JT12 whose dimensionless surface density is Σ0(R) = 3µ 4π R2 (1 + R2)5/2 , µ = Md M⋆ , R = r b , (1) where Md = Mp + Mg is the total disk mass, M⋆ is the mass of central star, Mp is the mass of particles, Mg is the mass of gas component, b is a length scale, and r is the radial distance to the central star. Top panel in Figure 1 shows the radial profile of Σ0/µ that peaks at R = √6/3. We suppose that the surface densities of the particle and gas phases are proportional to Σ0 so that Σν(R) = ¯MνΣ0(R) with ν ≡ p, g and ¯Mν = Mν/Md. Defining G as the gravitation constant, the dimensionless total gravitational potential field arising from Σ0 and the central star becomes V0(R) = 1 R − where Φ0 is the actual potential. b Φ0 GM⋆ = − µ 2 1 + 2R2 (1 + R2)3/2 , (2) If the gas is locally isothermal, its dimensionless pres- M.A. Jalali Table 1 The parameter q for several choices of b in three protoplanetary/planetary systems. M⋆/M⊙ r⋆/r⊙ T⋆/T⊙ b (AU) q Solar System Solar System Fomalhaut AB Aurigae 1 1 1.92 3.1 1 1 1.82 2.1 1 1 1.486 1.3-1.7 3.8 72 243 69 0.023 0.034 0.043 0.031 sure will be determined from p = c2 s Σg, c2 s = (cid:18) b GM⋆(cid:19)(cid:18) kBTg mg (cid:19) , (3) where cs is the normalized sound speed, kB is the Boltz- mann constant, and Tg is the absolute gas temperature. In passive disks heated by the stellar radiation (not by accretion), and sufficiently far from the central star, the radial profile of Tg is given by (Armitage 2010, §2.4) Tg = T⋆(cid:18) 2r⋆ 3πb(cid:19)3/4 1 R3/4 , (4) where T⋆ is the effective temperature of the central star and r⋆ is its radius. The mean thermal speed of gas th = (8/π)c2 molecules is related to the sound speed as v2 s. We therefore find vth = q R−3/8, q = (cid:18) 8b kBT⋆ πGM⋆mg(cid:19)1/2(cid:18) 2r⋆ 3πb(cid:19)3/8 . (5) With mg being the molecular mass of H2, we have com- puted the value of q and given in Table 1 for several choices of b in the solar system, and around AB Aurigae (Hashimoto et al. 2011) and Fomalhaut. The reason for our special selection of b will be explained in §4. In the absence of collisions between solid particles and gas molecules, the velocity of solid particles on circular orbits is determined from v2 p,c = R dV0 dR = 1 R + µ 2 R2(2R2 − 1) (1 + R2)5/2 , (6) and the radial momentum equation for the gas becomes v2 g,c R − Σg dp dR − Σg dV0 dR , = − from which we obtain the circular velocity of gas: v2 g,c = 5π 32 (1 − 3R2) (1 + R2) th + v2 v2 p,c. (7) (8) The condition v2 p,c ≥ 0 implies µ ≤ 55/2, which is satis- fied by protoplanetary disks. Bottom panel in Figure 1 illustrates the radial variation of ∆vc = (vp,c − vg,c)/vth for three values of q. The profile of ∆vc is almost flat for R . 0.3. According to equation (8), the gas stream- ing velocity exceeds the speed of particles for R2 < 1/3 and generates tailwind on them. This is a remarkable feature of ring-shaped disks, and has interesting implica- tions for the dynamics of solid particles in protoplanetary disks: while particles experience a resistive headwind for R2 > 1/3 and inspiral towards the central star, they are accelerated when R2 < 1/3 and migrate outwards. Global instabilities in protoplanetary disks 3 (12) (13) Inward and outward migrating particles will then be ac- cumulated near R2 ≈ 1/3 where the gas pressure is max- imum (see Haghighipour & Boss 2003). In next sections we show that such migrations are not towards the exact location of pressure maximum if solid particles move on eccentric orbits. Moreover, such migrations are shown to be accompanied by exponentially growing instabilities. 3. EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF SOLID PARTICLES The dynamics of particles is described by the phase space distribution function (DF) f (x, v, t) = mp Np(x, v, t) where Np is the number density of par- ticles. The vectors x = (x1, x2) and v = (v1, v2) (both in Cartesian coordinates) are the position and velocity vectors of particles in the disk plane, and t is the time. We utilize the DF (Jalali & Tremaine 2012, §3) f0 = mp Np,0 = L2K+2gK(E), (9) 2 to model the initial distribution of particles, before turn- ing on the collisions between solid particles and gas molecules. Here L = x × v and E = 1 v · v + V0 are, respectively, the orbital angular momentum and energy of particles per unit mass. There is an invertible, one-to- one and onto map from the (E, L)-space to the space of orbital elements (a, e) where a and e are the orbital semi- major axis and eccentricity, respectively. K is a positive integer that controls the mean eccentricity ¯e of the par- ticle disk. The function gK(E) takes physical (positive) values for K ≥ 2, and ¯e decreases as K is increased. In the limit of K → ∞ the disk becomes cold with all particles moving on circular orbits. In this study we ignore particle -- particle collisions, and assume that colliding solid particles and gas molecules are hard spheres. The evolution of f is therefore expressed by the Fokker-Planck equation (Binney & Tremaine 2008, §7.4) = − (D[∆vi] f ) ∂f ∂t ∂ ∂vi ∂f ∂vi + ai ∂f ∂xi ∂2 + vi + 1 2 ∂vi∂vj (D[∆vi∆vj] f ) , (10) where D[∆vi] and D[∆vi∆vj] are diffusion coefficients and ai are the components of the acceleration vector. In equation (10) and throughout the paper a repeated in- teger index stands for summation over that index from 1 to 2. The acceleration vector is computed from a = −∇V = −∇[V0 + V1(R, φ, t)] where the perturbed po- tential V1 is self-consistently calculated from the density disturbance Σ1(R, φ, t) of particle distribution. Since we have assumed Σp ≪ Σg, the contribution of the gas com- ponent to V1 is neglected. For local collisions, the diffusion coefficients are eval- uated using the procedure of Rosenbluth et al. (1957), but for three dimensional collisions of hard spheres with the cross section Sp,g = β2/4 where β = rp + rg. Let us define γ = mg/(mp + mg) and denote the absolute velocity of gas molecules by v′. We obtain D[∆vi] = ∂h(x, v, t) ∂vi , D[∆vi∆vj ] = ∂2g(x, v, t) ∂vi∂vj , (11) where the potential functions h(x, v, t) and g(x, v, t) are given by the following integrals h = −πγβ2 πγ2β2 3 g = 15 Z Ng(x, v′, t)v − v′3dv′, Z Ng(x, v′, t)v − v′5dv′, and Ng(x, v′, t) is the number density of gas molecules in the phase space. In deriving equations (12) and (13) we have assumed three-dimensional scattering of gas molecules by solid objects whose motion is confined to the disk plane. Therefore, the velocity vector of gas molecules is v′ = (v′ 3 is the velocity com- ponent perpendicular to the disk plane. Defining 3) where v′ 1, v′ 2, v′ [Σp, Σp¯vi, Σpvivj] = Z [1, vi, vivj] f dv, (14) the elements of the stress tensor are determined as τij = Σp (vivj − ¯vi¯vj). The macroscopic quantities Σp, ¯vi and τij are functions of x and t, and the second term on the right-hand side of equation (10) integrates to zero up to the first-order moment equations. Collisional terms involving g(x, v, t) correspond to random motions, and contribute to the evolutionary equations of τij (second- order moments of the Fokker-Planck equation). We ne- glect them in the present study because the mass ratio of gas molecules to solid particles is small, mg/mp ≪ 1, which implies g/h ∼ O(mg/mp). The Fokker-Planck equation can therefore be reduced to ∂f ∂t + ∂ ∂xi ( xi f ) + ∂ ∂vi ( vi f ) = 0, (15) with the dimensionless motion equations xi = vi, vi = − ∂V ∂xi + b2 GM⋆ D[∆vi]. (16) Differentiating (12) with respect to vi gives D[∆vi] = −πγβ2Z Ng(x, v′, t)v − v′(vi − v′ i) dv′.(17) Evaluating this integral requires the explicit form of Ng. Nonetheless, such details are not necessary if we make some further simplifying assumptions: Let (eR, eφ) be unit base vectors in the polar coordinates (R, φ). For e ≪ 1, the velocities of particles and gas molecules will be approximated as v ∼ vp,c eφ + O(eRΩ), v′ ∼ vg,c eφ + O(vth), (18) where Ω = R−3/2 + O(µ) is the orbital frequency of particles. We think of disks with vth < vp,c, vg,c over 0.03 . R . 10 (cf. Figure 1) to guarantee the exis- tence of bound orbits, and avoid gas dispersal through photoevaporation. The mean eccentricity corresponding to (9) is almost constant over the entire disk space (see JT12), and it is given by ¯e = [π/(4K + 2)]1/2 +O(µ). For q ∼ O(10−2), which corresponds to protoplanetary disks around solar-type stars, and for K ≤ 29 experimented in JT12, one has ¯e ≫ vth RΩ = qR1/8 + O(µ), 0.03 ≤ R ≤ 10. (19) 4 M.A. Jalali From (8), (18) and (19) we conclude that the bulk of particles move with supersonic speeds with respect to the gas stream, and they satisfy v− v′ ≈ eRΩ. The integral in (17) is thus approximated by b2 GM⋆ D[∆vi]≈−ξ0 eRΩ ρg (vi − Ui) , ξ0 = π(cid:18) M⋆ mp(cid:19)(cid:16) rp b (cid:17)2 , (20) (21) where ρg = Σg(R)δ(z) and Ui(x, t) = ¯v′ i are the spatial density and streaming velocity components of the gas phase, respectively. Here δ(z) is Dirac's delta function and z measures the height above the disk mid-plane. The gas density and velocity components have been normal- ized to M⋆/b3 and [GM⋆/b]1/2, respectively. Equation (20) is equivalent to the drag force expression of Kwok (1975) in supersonic regimes. Assuming that the mass of each particle is computed from mp = (4/3)πρsr3 p, with ρs being the typical density of rocky material, one finds ξ0 ∝ 1/rp. With ξ0 = (M⋆/mp)(rp/b) the scattering of gas molecules takes place in the disk plane and the cross section Sp,g becomes a line of the length rp + rg. We are not interested in this extreme unphysical case. For near-circular orbits with e → 0, one obtains v − v′ ≈ vth and D[∆vi] transforms to the well-known form of Epstein drag: b2 GM⋆ D[∆vi] ≈ −ξ0 vth ρg (vi − Ui) . (22) During our numerical computations we use equation (20) if e vp,c > vth and apply (22) otherwise. A factor 4/3 is missing on the right hand side of equation (22). It can be recovered through assuming a Maxwell-Boltzmann dis- tribution in the velocity space for Ng, and exactly per- forming the integral in (17). Nonetheless, the missing factor is unimportant in our computations, for we will vary ξ0 to explore the influence of drag force on the disk evolution, and one may suppose that any constant factor have already been included in ξ0. To compute diffusion coefficients numerically, we soften Dirac's delta function using its normal distribution representation: ρg = Σg(R) √2π h e−z2/2h2 , Z +∞ −∞ ρg dz = Σg, (23) where h ≪ 1 is the dimensionless scale-height of the disk and can be a function of R. The three dimensional struc- ture and evolution of circumstellar disks have not been modeled in this study; we thus work with a constant h and set ξ0 ρg = ξ Σg, ξ = ξ0√2π h , (24) in the disk mid-plane where the Fokker-Planck equation governs the evolution of the particle phase. Solving (15) in a four-dimensional phase space, with particle motions confined to the disk plane, is facilitated by utilizing the angle variables w = (w1, w2) and their conjugate actions J = (J1, J2). We follow JT12 and set J1 and J2 to the radial action JR and the orbital angular momentum Jφ = Rvφ, respectively. In the (w, J)-space, the motion equations (16) become ∂H ∂wi ∂H ∂Ji − FJi , Ji = − wi = + Fwi , i = 1, 2, (25) where H = 1 v · v + V (x, t) is the Hamiltonian function, and the generalized forces FJi and Fwi are determined using the virtual work of nonconservative forces: 2 Fwi δwi + FJiδJi = b2 GM⋆ D[∆vi] · δxi, (26) with δ being the variational operator. In Appendix A we explain the procedure of calculating Fwi (J, w1) and FJi(J, w1). They are real harmonic functions of w1 and are smooth in the J-space. We now write equation (15) in the angle-action space: ∂f ∂t + [f,H] + DF f = 0, (27) where [. , .] denotes the Poisson bracket over the (w, J)- space and the collision operator DF is defined by . (28) + Fwi ∂ ∂Ji − FJi ∂ ∂wi DF = ∂Fwi ∂Ji − ∂FJi ∂wi 4. UNSTABLE MODES We seek solutions of the form f = f0(J) + f1(w, J, t) for equation (27) so that f1 ≪ f0. The Hamiltonian corresponding to f will become H = H0 + V1 where the perturbed potential V1 (self-consistently arising from f1) and H0 = 1 v · v + V0(R) are expressed in the angle- action space (Jalali 2010, §2). f1 is obtained by solving the perturbed Fokker-Planck equation: 2 ∂f1 ∂t + [f1,H0] + [f0, V1] + DF f1 = −DF f0, (29) which is a non-homogenous partial differential equation. 4.1. Secular Migrations The particular solution of (29) is a radial drift of the form fd(J, w1, t). For the small disturbances fd ≪ f0, we can ignore DF fd against DF f0 and write + [fd,H0] + [f0, Vd] = −DF f0, ∂fd ∂t (30) where the left hand side is the linear approximation of the total derivative dfd/dt, and the potential Vd corresponds to fd. From the definition of DF and equations (A8) -- (A10), we arrive at − DF f0 = +∞ Xl=−∞ Sl(J) eılwR, (31) whose l 6= 0 terms lead to particular periodic solutions fd(J, w1) = fd(J, w1 + 2π). However, the dominant col- lisional term S0(J) =− F 0 w1 = wi(cid:1) , ∂ +∞ ∂Ji (cid:0)f0F 0 Xl=−∞ (32) +∞ l QR,lξ(−l) + l ηlη(−l′)Qφ,(−l−l′), Xl,l′=−∞ F 0 w2 = Qφ,0. Global instabilities in protoplanetary disks 5 0.4 0.3 e 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 S0/(f0 ξ)< 0 0.0005 0.0004 0.0003 0.0002 0.0001 0 10 e r u s s e r p m u m x a M i + 1 a Figure 2. Isocontours of the collisional term S0/(f0ξ) in the space of orbital elements. Horizontal dashed line corresponds to the mean eccentricity ¯e = 0.156 of particle orbits in the initial model. Mass parameters have been set to µ = 0.04 and µp = 1/8. Particles migrate linear in time towards the accumulation point (a0, e0) ≈ (0.63, 0.128) shown by a cross. Contour lines mark the levels 0.0 to 4 × 10−4 with steps of 10−4. Note the logarithmic scale of the a-axis. results in a secular drift fd ∼ S0t in the phase space: the DF of particles linearly increases in time if their actions satisfy S0(J) > 0, and it decreases for S0(J) < 0. Such drag-induced migrations can accumulate particles in re- gions where S0(J) has a positive local maximum. Since S0 (and therefore dfd/dt) depends on the initial DF, it is useful to normalize it to f0 and investigate the relative variation of particle distribution in the (a, e)-space. For a model with K = 29 and q = 0.034, we have plotted the contours of S0/(f0ξ) in Figure 2 for mass pa- rameters µ = 0.04 and µp = Mp/Mg = 1/8. The mean eccentricity of particle orbits of this model is ¯e = 0.156. It is seen that S0/(f0ξ) is negative for eccentric orbits with e & 0.22 and the population of those orbits is falling in time. Meanwhile, the number of particles increases to- wards an accumulation point at (a0, e0) ≈ (0.63, 0.128). The eccentricity of this accumulation point is less than the mean eccentricity of the initial model, and its semi- major axis is very close to R = 0.577 where the gas pres- sure is maximum. The local maximum of S0/(f0ξ) in the (a, e)-space is reminiscent of the distribution of asteroids between Mars and Jupiter with the mean orbital eccen- tricity ≈ 0.14, and classical Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) with ¯eKBO ≈ 0.1. The mean semi-major axis of classical KBOs is ¯aKBO ≈ 45 AU. If we assume that they are rem- nants of planet formation that reside at the accumulation point, the length scale b of our annular disk model reads b = ¯aKBO/a0 ≈ 71.43 AU, which gives q ≈ 0.034 used in computations of Figure 2 (see also Table 1). Moreover, for the asteroids between Mars and Jupiter the semi- major axis ranges from aAST ≈ 2.1 to 3.3 AU. The most populous group of these asteroids has a mean semi-major axis of ¯aAST ≈ 2.4 AU. The second plausible length scale of our model is therefore b = ¯aAST/a0 ≈ 3.81 AU that corresponds to q ≈ 0.023. Decreasing µ and µp does not considerably change the pattern of S0/(f0ξ), but propor- tionally decreases its maximum value at the accumula- tion point. 4.2. Exponentially Growing Instabilities We now search for non-axisymmetric homogeneous so- lutions of equation (29) that depend on (w1, w2, t), and satisfy ∂f1 ∂t + [f1,H0] + [f0, V1] + DF f1 = 0. We consider unsteady DFs of the form (JT12, §6) f1 = f1(J)e−ıωt+ım(w2−w1), ω = ωr + ıs, (33) (34) that corresponds to a slowly rotating density wave with the azimuthal wavenumber m: Σ1 = ReZ f1 dv = estA(R) cos[mφ − ωrt + ϑ(R)].(35) Here ωr/m and s are the pattern speed and growth/decay rate of density perturbations, respectively. The radial profiles of the wave amplitude A(R) and phase angle ϑ(R) are time-invariant in the linear regime, and ϑ van- ishes for stable waves with s = 0. The perturbed poten- tial V1 = V1(J)e−ıωt+ım(w2−w1), (36) and density Σ1 are related through Poisson's integral. In this paper we work with lopsided m = 1 waves, which ac- celerate the central star. Therefore, the reference frame attached to the central star is not inertial, and we in- clude the indirect gravitational potential (see JT12) in our formulation. Substituting from (34) and (36) into (33) yields the fol- lowing linear eigenvalue problem for ω and its associated eigenfunction f1: (cid:20)ω − + ı(cid:18) ∂Fwi + ıe−ıw1 ∂ f1 ∂Ji ∂Ji + FJ2 − FJ1(cid:19)(cid:21) e−ıw1 f1 ∂f0 Fwi +(cid:18) ∂f0 ∂J2 − ∂J1(cid:19) e−ıw1 V1 = 0, (37) where (J) = Ω2(J)− Ω1(J) is the precession frequency of particle orbits. The orbital frequencies Ωi(J) = ∂H0/∂Ji (i = 1, 2) are determiend in the unperturbed state. For nearly circular orbits one finds (JT12) c(R) = 3µ 4 R3/2(1 − 4R2) (1 + R2)7/2 + O(µ2), (38) which has the maximum value max = 0.05861µ at R = 0.2859. We utilize the finite element method of Jalali (2010) and JT12, and compute the eigenfre- quency spectrum of (37) for a model with K = 29 and q = 0.034. We vary µ, µp and ξ to investigate the ef- fects of particle size and mass fraction on the develop- ment of density waves. Our finite element model has N = 200 ring elements whose radial nodes are located at Rn = 10(4n−2N −4)/(N +1) for n = 1, 2, . . . , N . Using this mesh, eigenfrequencies are calculated with a relative accuracy ≤ 0.5%. In the absence of gas drag, ξ = 0, and for 1/32 ≤ µp ≤ 1/8, the spectrum contains two stable slow modes, which are labelled by A1 (fundamental mode) and A2 (secondary mode). The pattern speeds of these modes satisfy the inequality ωr & max. All other modes are 6 M.A. Jalali Table 2 Pattern speeds and growth rates of slow modes A1 and A2 versus ξ. In all models we have set K = 29 and q = 0.034. model parameters Mode A1 Mode A2 model µ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 µp 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/16 1/32 1/32 1/32 1/32 min × 103 max × 103 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -8.239 -4.137 -4.137 -4.137 -4.137 -2.073 -2.073 -2.073 -2.073 2.344 2.344 2.344 2.344 2.344 2.344 2.344 2.344 1.172 1.172 1.172 1.172 0.586 0.586 0.586 0.586 ξ 0 0.10 0.20 0.40 0 0.10 0.20 0.40 0 0.10 0.20 0.40 0 0.10 0.20 0.40 ωr/max s × 105 ωr/max s × 105 1.105 1.105 1.106 1.110 1.034 1.034 1.036 1.040 1.034 1.034 1.035 1.040 0.998 0.999 1.001 1.005 0 1.719 3.428 6.777 0 1.908 3.787 7.386 0 0.954 1.893 3.693 0 0.494 0.947 1.756 1.053 1.053 1.052 1.051 0.9995 0.9997 1.000 -- 0.9994 0.9995 1.000 -- 0.977 -- -- -- 0 1.908 3.821 7.638 0 1.848 3.516 -- 0 0.924 1.758 -- 0 -- -- -- singular and form a continuum over the range min < ωr < max. The minimum and maximum precession frequencies, min and max, occur at the circular orbit boundary of the action space with J1 = 0, and (J) vanishes for radial orbits. Singular modes are associated with the inner Lindblad resonance (J) − ωr = 0 and they can engage both circular and non-circular orbits. Table 2 shows the variation of min and max in terms of µ and µp. By setting ξ > 0 and turning on the gas drag, all sin- gular and long-wavelength modes become unstable. The pattern speeds and growth rates of modes A1 and A2 have been reported in Table 2 for 16 different models whose particle and gas phases are Toomre stable. It is seen that ωr/max is a function of µp, and s is an almost linear function of ξ ¯Mg = ξµ/(1+µp). Gas drag has not a notable contribution to the pattern speeds of modes and it only controls the growth rate. Figure 3 displays the perturbed density patterns of stable model 1 and unsta- ble model 4. Except in model with µp = 1/8, mode A1 always rotates and grows faster than mode A2. Compar- ing the modal content of our ξ = 0 disks with the results of JT12 (see their Figure 4) shows that short-wavelength slow modes have been disappeared by setting Mp < Md and the pattern speeds of the modes with the longest wavelengths have approached to + max. This is very sim- ilar to the behavior of disk galaxies: increasing the mass of dark matter halo stabilizes tightly wound spiral modes and only modes with the longest wavelengths, especially the bar mode, survive (Jalali 2007). Figure 4 demonstrates the amplitude function A(R) for several models. It is seen that by increasing ξ the local minimum between two density maxima increases. This is because of the enhanced spirality that smoothly connects density bumps. The local minimum is exactly equal to zero in models with ξ = 0 and corresponds to a node of stable oscillatory waves. Varying µ does not change the mode shape (this had already been pointed out by JT12), but decreasing µp shortens the wavelength of both modes A1 and A2. Variation of q has a negligible effect on the eigenmodes. Our experiments show that reducing q from 0.034 to 0.023 changes the eigenfrequencies by ≈ 0.2%. For discrete slow modes, resonant cavities become smaller as µp falls off and mode A2 disappears: mode A2 has hardly managed to exist in model 13, which is sta- ble. Nonexistence of mode A2 in models with µp = 1/16 and ξ & 0.2, shows that the development of unstable wave packets is allowed only for ξ < ξcr where the criti- cal drag parameter ξcr depends on both µ and µp. Also note the nonexistence of unstable secondary modes in models with µp = 1/32. We have a simple physical explanation for the existence of a critical drag param- eter: slow modes are supported by the precession of or- bits and the leading or trailing nature of developing un- stable spiral patterns can be estimated using dc/dR, which switches sign at R = 0.2859. Spiral patterns will be trailing if dc/dR < 0 and leading otherwise (cf. Binney & Tremaine 2008, §6.1.3). In the region occu- pied by the central wave packet of mode A2 (see Figure 4), and when the mode is unstable, the quantity dc/dR can take both negative and positive values and that wave packet will be sheared. Larger the value of ξ higher the imposed shearing. The wave packet can thus resist disruption only for small deformations corresponding to ξ < ξcr. It is evident from Figure 3 that the inner wave packet of mode A2 leads its stable counterpart because it lies in the region with dc/dR < 0. The opposite phenomenon is happening for the outer wave packet. Only mode A1 can marginally tolerate ωr/max . 1 and ξ > 0 because the local minimum of A(R) is lo- cated near the maximum of c, and its two main wave packets lie in regions where dc/dR has a definite sign. Moreover, its resonant zone is large enough to trap non- circular orbits with (J) < max. The number of slow modes also depends on the mean eccentricity of particle orbits. Our numerical experiments with µp = 1/8 show that mode A2 completely disappears as its pattern speed drops below max by increasing ¯e. Global instabilities in protoplanetary disks 7 Mode A2 , ξ=0 -0.5 0 x 0.5 Mode A2 , ξ=0.4 Mode A1 , ξ=0 -0.5 0 x 0.5 Mode A1 , ξ=0.4 0.5 y 0 -0.5 0.5 y 0 -0.5 1 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 y 0 0.2 -0.5 0 1 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 y 0 0.2 -0.5 -0.5 0 x 0.5 0 -0.5 0 x 0.5 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Figure 3. Mode shapes of global stable (top) and unstable (bottom) density waves of the particle phase in a protoplanetary disk with µ = 0.04, Mp/Mg = 1/8 and ¯e = 0.156. Contour plots show the positive parts of the perturbed density Σ1 at t = 0. In all cases, density waves rotate counterclockwise and their corresponding pattern speeds are given in Table 2. The outer density bump of unstable mode A1 is a trailing spiral. The inner and outer wave packets of unstable mode A2 lead and trail their stable counterparts, respectively. Solid circle shows the location of the central star. Except for ξ = 0, f0(J) is not an equilibrium DF and it is regarded as the initial condition for the perturbed Fokker-Planck equation. It is hard to imagine an equilib- rium state at early epochs of protoplanetary disks when most ingredients of planet formation are transported due to dissipative forces. There is indeed a competition be- tween the homogenous and particular solutions of equa- tion (29) and the relative magnitude of s with respect to S0/f0 decides which process wins. According to Fig- ures 2 and 3, near the major peaks of modes A1 and A2 we have S0/f0 ≈ 2 × 10−4ξ, which has exactly the same order of magnitude of s for unstable µp = 1/8 models of Table 2. Drag-induced instabilities that grow propor- tional to est can therefore overwhelm secular migrations, consume most solid particle reserve of the disk within R < a0, and rapidly form bigger objects. Near the accu- mulation point, the amplitude of unstable density waves diminishes significantly, but since secular migration is a very slow process (linear in time), particles are expected to form only a debris ring as the gas is depleted at the later stages of disk evolution. A small fraction of solid particles will eventually live in the vicinity of the ac- cumulation point and majority of them are transported through spiral arms to unstable regions. 5. APPLICATIONS TO THE SOLAR SYSTEM To this end, we discuss the implications of global drag- induced instabilities to planet formation in the solar sys- tem. We use the amplitude functions of modes in model 1 because their profiles does not change significantly by varying the mass parameters and ξ (see Figure 4). According to simulations of circumstellar disks, vis- cous accretion, photoevaporation and stellar winds create a gap structure near the gravitational radius (Matsuyama et al. 2003), and the disk is split to two annuli. For the solar nebula, the gravitational radius is between the orbits of Saturn and Uranus (Shu et al. 1993), and therefore, the outer ring of the solar system would contain ice giants and KBOs. If we suppose that 8 ) R ( A ) R ( A ) R ( A 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Mode A1 Mode A1 Mode A2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 2 Model 6 Model 10 Model 14 Model 2 Model 6 Model 10 Model 13 0.1 R 1 Figure 4. Variation of the amplitude profile A(R) of modes A1 and A2 in models with different mass parameters and drag coeffi- cients. See Table 2 for the specifications of the models. The dif- ference between models 6 and 10 is indistinguishable in the plots. The R-axis is in logarithmic scale. classical KBOs are the debris material near the accumu- lation point, our ring-like disks and their modal content can be fit to the structure of the outer solar system by assuming b = ¯aKBO/a0 = 71.43 AU (top panel in Figure 5). Interestingly, the semi-major axis of Uranus matches the location of the major density bump of mode A1 and Neptune is clearly associated with the outer bump. If we assume that both planets were formed exactly at the peaks of mode A1, Uranus and Neptune should have mi- grated outwards for about 1.5 and 6 AU, respectively. This is consistent with Malhotra's (1995) resonant cap- ture theory that explains the orbital dynamics of Pluto and Plutinos. If we now assume that the inner annulus (emerged from the gap formation) contained terrestrial planets and main asteroid belt, and that the asteroids between 2.1 and 3.2 AU are the remnants of secular migrations, one can fit our annular disk to the structure of the inner solar system by setting b = ¯aAST/a0 = 3.81 AU. Doing so, present orbital semi-major axes of Venus, the Earth and Mars will lie in the region affected by the density bumps of modes A1 and A2 (bottom panel in Figure 5). We note that the mean radial distance between the density bumps of unstable modes and the accumulation point is approximately equal to the distance from the position of maximum orbital precession (with dc/dR = 0) to the position of maximum pressure. This characteristic length depends on the radial variations of surface density, sound speed and gravitational potential, but the relative positions of unstable modes and the accumulation point seems to be model-independent because the maximum precession rate occurs where the surface density is rising, and the region with maximum gas pressure is close to the region with maximum surface density. Our theory cannot be directly applied to the formation of gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn, because the gas disk M.A. Jalali was not responsive to perturbations in the particle phase. Nonetheless, we can make useful predictions about the possible origins of gas giants and see whether they could have interfere with the formation of rocky planets. First of all, Jupiter and Saturn lie well within the inner ring characterized by b = 3.81 AU, and since we have not de- tected any instability of the particle phase at their cur- rent orbital distances, they have probably formed from an instability in the gas phase. We compute Toomre's Q over the inner ring and in terms of dimensionless vari- ables: √2πq 3 ¯MgR3/2 (cid:20) (1 + R2)5/2 + O(µ)(cid:21) , (39) where κ = Ω + O(µ) is the epicyclic frequency of near-circular orbits. The function Q(R) has a global minimum at Rcr = 1.856, and its minimum value is Qmin = 3.168 q/ ¯Mg. Near the orbit of Jupiter we have q = 0.024. The gas phase thus becomes unstable there if Qmin < 1 that implies ¯Mg > 0.076. This corresponds to a more massive disk than minimum solar nebula and mod- els investigated in Table 2. Nevertheless, the predicted mass threshold falls well in the mass range of circum- stellar disks observed around nearby stars. The most csκ πΣg R19/8 Q = = s u n a r U e n u t p e N Mode A1 Mode A2 ) U A 5 4 ( s O B K l i a c s s a C l t i n o p n o i t l a u m u c c A 10 20 30 r (AU) 40 50 60 y r u c r e M h t r a E e h T s u n e V s r a M ) U A 4 . 2 ( t l e B d o r e i t s A Mode A1 Mode A2 t i n o p n o i t l a u m u c c A ) r ( 0 Σ / ) r ( A ) r ( 0 Σ / ) r ( A 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 r (AU) 2.5 3 3.5 Figure 5. Normalized amplitude profiles A(r)/Σ0(r) of unsta- ble modes A1 and A2 for model 1 in Table 2. Top: Clas- sical KBOs reside at the accumulation point and we have set b = ¯aKBO/a0 = 71.43 AU. The current semi-major axes of the or- bits of Saturn and Neptune are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Bottom: Unstable modes are fit to the inner solar system with b = ¯aAST/a0 = 3.81 AU. The mean semi-major axis of the most populous asteroid belt, and the present semi-major axes of the ter- restrial planets have been indicated by vertical dotted lines. Global instabilities in protoplanetary disks 9 striking point of this calculation is that when one sets b = ¯aAST/a0 = 3.81 AU, short-wavelength instabilities in the gas phase can be triggered around rcr = Rcrb = 7.07 AU, which is halfway between the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn. For ¯Mg = 0.084, equation Q(R) − 1 = 0 has two roots at r1 = 4.95 and r2 = 10.6 AU, and the en- tire region between the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn is unstable in Toomre's sense. Such short-wavelength in- stabilities will not affect inner regions where the particle phase is unstable and rocky planets are being assembled. 6. PHYSICAL RANGES OF PARAMETERS In this section we determine over which physical ranges of parameters the perturbation solutions of the Fokker- Planck equation are acceptable. Throughout the calcu- lations of this section, we set M⋆=M⊙ and use a density of ρs = 3 g cm−3 for solid particles. We have ignored particle -- particle collisions in writing equation (29) and this simplification is legitimate if par- ticles collide after several orbital periods. In a monodis- perse system of spherical particles, the collisional cross section is Sp = π(2rp)2. Moreover, the radial velocity dispersion of particles in our disks is determined from σR = hv2 Ri1/2 = r 2 π ¯e R κ, (40) with κ being the epicyclic frequency of near-circular or- bits. In the absence of gas, the collision time tcollide (in the disk mid-plane) normalized to the orbital period torbit reads 2 × 10−19 m2. At R = 0.3 and in the disk mid-plane we obtain 2.9h 103 ¯Mg (cid:18) b 1 AU(cid:19)3 λ ≈ m. (45) a h = 0.01 scale-height (e.g., Assuming Goldreich & Ward 1973) in the models of Table 2, we find λ ≈ 4 -- 16 cm for b = 3.81 AU and λ ≈ 300 -- 1000 m for b = 71.43 AU. From the acceptable values of rp for having a collisionless particle phase and the physical range of λ, we conclude that particles interact with gas molecules through Stokes drag (skin friction) if we apply our model to the inner solar system. In such a circumstance, one must use the following drag parameter ξ0 = 1 2 CDπ(cid:18) M⋆ mp(cid:19)(cid:16) rp b (cid:17)2 , (46) where the drag coefficient CD depends on the Reynolds number. In the outer solar system, the drag force is computed from equations (20) and (22) up to km-size objects; it then switches to Stokes drag. When parti- cles move with supersonic speeds with the Mach number M ∼ eRΩ/cs & 3, the drag coefficient approximately becomes CD ≈ 0.92 (Liu 1958). Perturbation theory fails for large values of drag force, and one needs to constrain particle sizes (to which our results are applied) by the value of ξ. From equation (46) one can write ¯tcollide = tcollide torbit = 1 √2πΣp (cid:18) mp M⋆(cid:19)(cid:18) b2 Sp(cid:19) hpΩ σR , (41) rp = 3b CD 8√2π h ξ (cid:18) M⋆ b3ρs(cid:19) ≈ 4410CD b (cid:19)2 h ξ (cid:18) 1 AU m. (47) where hp is the scale-height of the particle disk. In low- mass disks particles can be scattered up to a vertical distance of hp = σR/Ω +O(µ), and equation (41) yields (42) ¯tcollide = √2π Σp (cid:18) mp M⋆(cid:19)(cid:18) b2 Sp(cid:19) + O(µ). 1 At R = 0.3, which is the position of the node of mode A1 and the mean orbital distance of its two density bumps, we obtain ¯tcollide ≈ 2.6 104 ¯Mp (cid:16) rp 1 m(cid:17)(cid:18) b 1 AU(cid:19)2 , (43) with ¯Mp = µpµ/(1 + µp). Since particle -- particle colli- sions can be ignored only for ¯tcollide ≫ 1, our govern- ing equations are valid for all models of Table 2 and for b = 3.81 AU (this is the length scale of the inner solar system) if rp ≫ 1.2 m. This size threshold reduces to rp ≫ 3.5 mm by adopting b = 71.43 AU for the outer so- lar system. On the other hand, the mean free path of gas molecules is defined as (e.g., Blundell & Blundell 2006, §8.3) (44) λ = b √2 ρg (cid:18) mg M⋆(cid:19)(cid:18) b2 Sg(cid:19) . Note that ρg is the dimensionless spatial density of the gas disk (see §3). For molecular hydrogen, we have mg = 3.32 × 10−27 kg and the collision cross section is Sg ≈ Consequently, the maximum value of ξ reachable by per- turbation theory puts a minimum threshold on the al- lowed particle sizes. Our numerical experiments show that by increasing the drag parameter to ξmax ∼ 1 the accuracy of mode A1 drops significantly and the ampli- tude function A(R) of that mode loses its smoothness, es- pecially for smaller fraction of solid particles. Using this empirical upper limit of ξ, and with h = 0.01, CD = 0.92 and b = 3.81 AU, we require rp & 28 km to ensure the va- lidity of perturbation theory. A nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation solver is thus needed to understand the physics of global instabilities for sub-km and km-size particles in the inner solar system. Choosing CD = 2 (colli- sional/Epstein drag regime) and b = 71.43 AU, we obtain rp & 170 m, which is smaller than the mean free path of gas molecules in the outer solar system. For the valid ranges of rp discussed above, one can readily verify that the dimensionless stopping time pa- rameter τs = Ω tstop = √2π Ωh Σgcs (cid:18) ρsb3 M⋆ (cid:19)(cid:16) rp b (cid:17) , (48) satisfies τs ≫ 1 in regions affected by unstable modes. The stopping time tstop in equation (48) has been defined based on Epstein drag law. One still finds τs ≫ 1 if Stokes drag force applies. Therefore, solid particles are not dynamically coupled to the gas flow and modeling the collective dynamics of particles in the context of kinetic theory is justified. 10 M.A. Jalali 7. DISCUSSIONS The infall time scale of O(102) yr for meter-sized solid bodies puts a strong constraint on the formation of plan- etesimals from dust grains and pebbles (Weidenschilling 1977). Recent simulations have shown that the backreac- tion of particles on gas can trigger out-of-plane Kelvin- Helmholtz instability, which boosts local particle den- sity and helps self-gravity to assemble km-size bodies. Turbulence, on the other hand, imposes stochastic forces on planetesimals, increases their collision frequency and disrupts those with ≤ 10 km radius (Nelson & Gressel 2010). Although the random forcing of planetesimals can be suppressed in the presence of a dead zone (Gressel et al. 2011), alternative and simpler processes may also be involved in the formation of super km-scale planetesimals. Slow density waves exist in all near-Keplerian, self- gravitating rings and can be excited by encounters (JT12). Addition of a gas component, however, destabi- lizes the particle phase without any external disturbance. We showed that the drag-induced infall of solid bodies into the central star is not a universal phenomenon and the direction of particle migration highly depends on the disk structure. There will be no infall if at some re- gion the disk density profile, including its solid particle and gas components, rises outwards. Therefore, with a preserved source of solid particles in the disk, global in- stabilities explored in this study will have time to boost the particle density to arbitrarily large levels and enhance the formation of bigger objects through gravitational col- lapse. One of the fundamental achievements of this study was how secular migrations and global instabilities can be used to identify possible planet forming regions in ob- served protoplanetary systems and debris disks. Although the gas flow in our disks was in laminar regime, turbulence does not seem to considerably change our fundamental results. Youdin (2011) estimates turbu- lent eddy length as ℓeddy = √α (49) qR9/8 + O(µ) cs Ω = r πα 8 where α is the dimensionless turbulent diffusivity. For α . 10−3 used by Youdin (2011), we see that ℓeddy is smaller, at least by three orders of magnitude, than the scale of the wave packets (and therefore the wave- length) of unstable modes. Therefore, turbulent diffu- sion is unimportant in the development of global density waves and their growth. Michikoshi et al. (2010) have also studied the forma- tion of planetesimals through gravitational instability. They assumed a non-responsive gas component, as we did, and introduced fluid dynamical equations to model the dynamics of dust particles in a local simulation box that rotates with Keplerian angular velocity. They then derived a dispersion relation by linearizing the continu- ity, momentum and Poisson equations, and showed the existence of secularly unstable long wavelength modes for a dissipative dust layer. This is somehow consistent with our findings that unstable modes have a long wavelength nature. However, their perturbation theory and N -body simulations that utilize a rotating simulation box with periodic boundary conditions, are not able to provide a global picture of particle migrations and information about possible planet forming regions. Moreover, the an- alytical results of Michikoshi et al. (2010) are valid only for particles dynamically coupled to gas, otherwise fluid dynamical equations with an isotropic pressure tensor could not be applied to the particle phase. Our findings apply to dispersive particle disks where the evolution of orbital eccentricity does matter. Due to computational difficulties of working with large values of K in f0 and a small mass ratio µp, we investi- gated global modes only for K = 29 that gives ¯e = 0.156. In accordance with WKB theory (JT12), decreasing the mean eccentricity of the particle disk is expected to pre- serve global stable modes, which then bifurcate to un- stable density waves in the presence of gas drag. For smaller mean eccentricities, the number of global modes may even increase as the resonant cavities of slow modes become thinner. A useful future experiment would be to decrease ¯e using a Schwarzschild DF and determine the number and shape of exponentially growing modes for µp . 0.01. Our results have been obtained for self-gravitating disks whose particle phase is constituted from monodis- perse hard spheres. Including the size distribution of particles and the effect of particle -- particle collisions, es- pecially catastrophic disruptions, is an interesting open problem. Moreover, by assuming Σp ≪ Σg we neglected the backreaction of particles on gas flow. A more accu- rate procedure is to simultaneously perturb the hydrody- namic and Fokker-Planck equations for the gas and par- ticle phases, respectively. We anticipate angular momen- tum exchange between the particle and gas phases, and any particle migration should induce radial mass transfer in the gas phase. I thank Scott Tremaine for his stimulating discussions during the course of this project. I also thank the referee for useful comments that inspired me to carry out new computations and improve the presentation of the paper. APPENDIX GENERALIZED FORCES IN THE ANGLE-ACTION SPACE We define (vR, vφ) as the velocity components of particles in the polar coordinates (R, φ), and the streaming velocity of the gas component will become Uφ(R)eφ where Uφ(R) has the functional form of vg,c. Using the action variables J = (J1, J2) and their conjugate angles w = (w1, w2), the radial distance and azimuthal position of a test particle is calculated from R = +∞ Xl=−∞ ξl(J)eılw1 , eıφ = eıw2 +∞ Xl=−∞ ηl(J)eılw1 , (A1) Global instabilities in protoplanetary disks where the Fourier coefficients are given by ξl(J) = 1 2π I R cos(lw1) dw1, ηl(J) = 1 2π I cos(φ − w2 − lw1) dw1. 11 (A2) These integrals are taken over a full cycle of rosette orbits. From (A1) one can compute the variations δR and δφ as δR = +∞ Xl=−∞ (cid:20)ı l ξl eılw1 δw1 + ∂ξl ∂Ji δJi eılw1(cid:21) , δφ = δw2 + +∞ Xl,l′=−∞ (cid:20)l ηlη(−l′) δw1 − ı ∂ηl ∂Ji η(−l′) δJi(cid:21) eı(l+l′)w1 . The virtual work of the drag force reads (A3) (A4) (A5) (A6) (A7) (A8) (A9) where CD(R) = ξ0 evp,c ρg if the orbital eccentricity e satisfies the inequality e > vth/vp,c and CD(R) = ξ0vthρg otherwise. We now utilize the following Fourier expansions − CD(R)vR δR − CD(R) [J2 − RUφ(R)] δφ = Fwiδwi + FJi δJi, − CD(R) vR = ı QR,l(J)eılw1 , QR,l(J) = −CD(R) [J2 − RUφ(R)] = and obtain Qφ,l(J)eılw1 , Qφ,l(J) = − +∞ Xl=−∞ Xl=−∞ +∞ 1 2π I CD(R) vR sin(lw1) dw1, 2π I CD(R) [J2 − RUφ(R)] cos(lw1) dw1, 1 Fw1 =− +∞ Xl,l′=−∞ +∞ l′ QR,l ξl′ eı(l+l′)w1 + +∞ Xl,l′,l′′=−∞ l Qφ,l′′ ηl η(−l′) eı(l+l′+l′′)w1 , Qφ,l eılw1 , Fw2 = FJi = Xl=−∞ Xl,l′=−∞ +∞ ı QR,l ∂ξl′ ∂Ji eı(l+l′)w1 − +∞ Xl,l′,l′′=−∞ ı ∂ηl ∂Ji REFERENCES η(−l′) Qφ,l′′ eı(l+l′+l′′)w1, i = 1, 2. (A10) Armitage P.J., 2010, Astrophysics of Planet Formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bai X.-N., Stone J.M., 2010a, ApJS, 190, 297 Bai X.-N., Stone J. M., 2010b, ApJ, 722, 1437 Binney J., Tremaine S., 2008, Galactic Dynamics, 2nd edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton Blum J., Wurm G., 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21 Blundell S.J., Blundell K.M., 2006, Concepts in Thermal Physics, Oxford University Press, New York Canup R.M., 2004, ARA&A, 42, 441 Goldreich P., Ward W.R., 1973, ApJ, 183, 1051 Gressel O., Nelson R.P., Turner N.J., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3291 Haghighipour N., Boss A.P., 2003, ApJ, 583, 996 Hashimoto J. et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, L17 Jalali M.A., 2007, ApJ, 669, 218 Jalali M.A., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1519 Jalali M.A., Tremaine S., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2368 Johansen A., Klahr H., Henning Th., 2006, ApJ, 636, 1121 Johansen A., Oishi J.S., Mac Low M.-M., Klahr H., Henning Th., Youdin A., 2007, Nature, 448, 1022 Johansen A., Klahr H., Henning Th., 2011, A&A, 529, A62 Kwok S., 1975, ApJ, 198, 583 Liu V.C., 1958, Journal of Applied Physics, 29, 194 Malhotra R., 1995, AJ, 110, 420 Matsuyama I., Johnstone D., Hartmann L., 2003, ApJ, 582, 893 Michikoshi S., Kokubo E., Inutsuka S.-I., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1021 Nelson R. P., Gressel O., 2010, MNRAS, 409, 639 Rosenbluth M.N., MacDonald W.M., Judd D.L., 1957, Physical Review, 107, 1 Shu F. H., Johnstone D., Hollenbach D., 1993, Icarus, 106, 92 Weidenschilling S. J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Youdin A.N., Goodman J., 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin A.N., 2011, ApJ, 731, 99
1912.06154	1	1912	2019-12-12T19:00:22	The evolution of dust in discs influenced by external photoevaporation	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.GA", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Protoplanetary discs form and evolve in a wide variety of stellar environments and are accordingly exposed to a wide range of ambient far ultraviolet (FUV) field strengths. Strong FUV fields are known to drive vigorous gaseous flows from the outer disc. In this paper we conduct the first systematic exploration of the evolution of the solid component of discs subject to external photoevaporation. We find that the main effect of photoevaporation is to reduce the reservoir of dust at large radii and this leads to more efficient subsequent depletion of the disc dust due to radial drift. Efficient radial drift means that photoevaporation causes no significant increase of the dust to gas ratio in the disc. We show that the disc lifetime in both dust and gas is strongly dependent on the level of the FUV background and that the relationship between these two lifetimes just depends on the Shakura-Sunyaev $\alpha$ parameter, with the similar lifetimes observed for gas and dust in discs pointing to higher $\alpha$ values ($\sim 10^{-2}$). On the other hand the distribution of observed discs in the plane of disc size versus flux at $850~\mu$m is better reproduced by lower $\alpha$ ($\sim 10^{-3}$). We find that photoevaporation does not assist rocky planet formation but need not inhibit mechanisms (such as pebble accretion at the water snow line) which can be effective sufficiently early in the disc's lifetime (i.e. well within a Myr).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Preprint 16 December 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The evolution of dust in discs influenced by external photoevaporation Andrew D. Sellek1(cid:63) Richard A. Booth1 Cathie J. Clarke1 1Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK Last updated 2019 December 11; in original form 2019 October 18 ABSTRACT Protoplanetary discs form and evolve in a wide variety of stellar environments and are accord- ingly exposed to a wide range of ambient far ultraviolet (FUV) field strengths. Strong FUV fields are known to drive vigorous gaseous flows from the outer disc. In this paper we conduct the first systematic exploration of the evolution of the solid component of discs subject to external photoevaporation. We find that the main effect of photoevaporation is to reduce the reservoir of dust at large radii and this leads to more efficient subsequent depletion of the disc dust due to radial drift. Efficient radial drift means that photoevaporation causes no significant increase of the dust to gas ratio in the disc. We show that the disc lifetime in both dust and gas is strongly dependent on the level of the FUV background and that the relationship between these two lifetimes just depends on the Shakura-Sunyaev α parameter, with the similar life- times observed for gas and dust in discs pointing to higher α values (∼ 10−2). On the other hand the distribution of observed discs in the plane of disc size versus flux at 850 µm is better reproduced by lower α (∼ 10−3). We find that photoevaporation does not assist rocky planet formation but need not inhibit mechanisms (such as pebble accretion at the water snow line) which can be effective sufficiently early in the disc's lifetime (i.e. well within a Myr). Key words: protoplanetary discs -- planets and satellites: formation -- submillimetre: planetary systems INTRODUCTION 1 It is apparent from a number of lines of evidence that protoplane- tary discs are subject to environmental damage from far ultraviolet (FUV) radiation. This is seen most readily in regions of very high FUV background, such as the Orion Nebula Cluster, where proplyd structures, consistent with ionisation by radiation from the cluster's most luminous O star, are observed in the vicinity of young low mass stars (O'dell et al. 1993; Henney & Arthur 1998). The few hundred au offset of these structures from their parent stars provides evi- dence for strong neutral disc winds, driven by environmental FUV radiation, which prevent the penetration of ionising photons to the disc surface (Johnstone et al. 1998), an interpretation corroborated by spectroscopic measurements (Henney & O'Dell 1999; Henney et al. 2002). Indirect evidence for the role of FUV irradiation in depleting protoplanetary discs is provided by the observed inverse correlation between FUV flux and the incidence of protoplanetary discs observed in the Cygnus OB2 association (Guarcello et al. 2016). While the fraction of young stars in the Galaxy that are subject to the high ultraviolet fluxes experienced in OB associations and dense clusters is only a few tens of per cent (Fatuzzo & Adams 2008), there is now increasing interest in the possibility of significant (cid:63) Contact e-mail: [email protected] © 2019 The Authors environmental damage also in regions of relatively low ultraviolet background 1. Following Adams et al. (2004), Facchini et al. (2016) constructed models for FUV driven winds down to much lower FUV fields, showing that even here winds provide an important sink of disc mass for discs larger than ∼ 100 au. Subsequently, Haworth et al. (2017) modeled the extended CO halo around the large disc in IM Lupi in terms of a photeoevaporative wind driven by the mild (∼ 4 G0) FUV background in its vicinity (Cleeves et al. 2016). While a number of studies have modeled the impact of photo- evaporation on protoplanetary disc demographics (Scally & Clarke 2001; Winter et al. 2018, 2019b; Concha-Ramírez et al. 2019; Nicholson et al. 2019) such modeling has studied the dispersal of disc gas and then compared with observational diagnostics which are, however, mainly based on disc dust. Such an approach is rea- sonable if disc dust grains remain small and thus well coupled to the gas. However grain growth causes partial dynamical decoupling between dust and gas. This both a) limits the capacity of the wind to remove dust (Throop & Bally 2005; Facchini et al. 2016; Hutchison et al. 2016; Carrera et al. 2017) but also b) leads to radial drift of dust that is torqued down by the mildly sub-Keplerian rotation of 1 The FUV background is conventionally denoted as a multiple of the Habing unit, G0, which is 1.6 × 10−3 erg cm−2 over the energy range 6 − 13.6 eV (Habing 1968), such that the local interstellar field is 1.7 G0 2 A. D. Sellek et al. the disc gas (Whipple 1973; Weidenschilling 1977; Takeuchi et al. 2005; Brauer et al. 2008; Birnstiel et al. 2010, 2012). While the for- mer enhances the dust to gas ratio, and has been invoked as a possible instigator of conditions necessary for triggering the streaming in- stability (Youdin & Goodman 2005) in the residual dust layer, the latter instead lowers the dust to gas ratio (Birnstiel et al. 2012) un- less some mechanism (such as pressure traps introduced by planets; Paardekooper & Mellema 2004; Rosotti et al. 2016) acts to retain dust grains in the outer disc (Ricci et al. 2012; Pinilla et al. 2012). To date the only calculation which has attempted to disentangle these two trends in the case of external, FUV driven photoevaporation is that of Haworth et al. (2018a) which supplemented a calculation of the gas evolution with estimates of the growth and migration of the dust component. In the present paper we remedy this insufficiency by conduct- ing calculations of viscously evolving protoplanetary discs that are subject to photoevaporation and where we model the evolution of the dust component using the methodology of Birnstiel et al. (2012) (see also Booth et al. 2017). This approach models dust growth and its limitation by radial drift or fragmentation and tracks the evolu- tion of the dust surface density as a result of radial drift and partial entrainment in the photoevaporative wind. Our chief motivations for this study are: i) to compare the lifetimes of the gas and dust in protoplanetary discs as a function of radiative environment ii) to determine how photoevaporation affects the sizes of dust discs in order to compare with high resolution submm surveys in a variety of environments (c.f. Tazzari et al. 2017; Barenfeld et al. 2017; Tri- pathi et al. 2017) and iii) to consider how photoevaporation affects the planet formation potential of protoplanetary discs. In the latter regard, we will focus on the effect on the solid component, assessing whether the assembly of rocky planets is promoted by enhancement of the local dust to gas ratio in the outer disc (Throop & Bally 2005) or whether (as argued by Haworth et al. 2018a) the loss of dust in the wind at early times instead suppresses rocky planet formation. In this study we take advantage of the recently published FRIED grid of photoevaporation models (Haworth et al. 2018b) which presents photoevaporation rates as a function of disc outer radius, local density and stellar mass over a wide range of back- ground field strengths. These 1D thermochemical simulations (in which mass loss is concentrated at the disc's outer rim) have been calibrated against 1D analytic solutions (Haworth et al. 2016) and are also found to be in broad agreement with the results of 2D simu- lations (Haworth & Clarke 2019), although the latter yield somewhat larger total mass loss because of mass loss from the disc's upper and lower surfaces. We detail the coupling of the photoevaporation grid to the viscous evolution of the disc and the evolution of the dust component in Section 2. In Section 3 we briefly describe the evolution of the disc gas under combined viscous evolution and pho- toevaporation and demonstrate the same qualitative features (using a previous photoevaporation prescription) found by Clarke (2007). In Section 4 we describe a fiducial model containing dust, demon- strating an early phase of dust growth and entrainment in the wind followed by a successive phase of dust depletion due to radial drift. In Section 5 we explore the dependence of the dust evolution on model parameters and in Section 6 we summarise the implications of our modeling for reproducing the observed demographics of pro- toplanetary discs. Section 7 discusses how our results affect the planet forming potential of protoplanetary discs and Section 8 sum- marises our conclusions. (cid:19)−q (cid:18) R R0 2 MODEL 2.1 Treatment of viscous evolution and dust evolution We model the viscous evolution of the gas and growth and radial migration of the dust as in Booth et al. (2017) for which the treatment of the dust follows that of Birnstiel et al. (2012). We employ a mid- plane radial temperature profile T(R) modeled according to: T = T0 . (1) Assuming a constant α viscosity prescription (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973), the kinematic viscosity ν then scales with radius as ν ∝ Rγvisc ∝ R3/2−q . (2) We explore spatially uniform α values motivated by the range of viscosities inferred from observations: 10−3 (Rafikov 2017) and 10−2 (Hartmann et al. 1998). Following Clarke (2007) and Facchini et al. (2016) we then choose q = 0.5 such that ν is linear with radius. This dependence - which results if stellar irradiation of dust in the form of the blackbody equilibrium temperature dominates the heating (Kenyon & Hartmann 1987; Chiang & Goldreich 1997) - is supported by mean fits of the SED shape for q (Andrews & Williams 2005; Kenyon & Hartmann 1995) and the corresponding linear dependence of viscosity on disc radius is also consistent with the observed variation of accretion rates onto T Tauri stars as a function of age (Hartmann et al. 1998). In order to set a temperature scale, we set the aspect ratio (the ratio of scale height H over radius, which scales as H/R ∝ R1/4) to H/R ∼ 0.033 at R0 = 1 au such that T0 ≈ 279 K for a 1 M(cid:12) star. As our initial condition we adopt the similarity solution of Lynden-Bell & Pringle (1974) for the surface density, Σ: (cid:19)−γ (cid:18) R RC (cid:18) (cid:19)2−γ Σ = Σ0 exp − R RC , (3) where γ = γvisc (Equation 2) and RC is the scale radius of the ex- ponential cut off (i.e. RC sets the initial extent of the disc). RC was varied between 10 and 300 au. The values adopted are roughly in the range derived from submm continuum observations of protoplane- tary discs (e.g. Ansdell et al. 2018; Tripathi et al. 2017), although this observational measure should not necessarily coincide with the initial, mass-based measure of radius represented by RC. The den- sity normalisation, Σ0, is set by the total disc mass. Observational studies measure dust masses of up to ∼ 100 M⊕ (e.g. 141 M⊕ in Lupus, Ansdell et al. 2016), corresponding to discs with (cid:38) 30 Jupiter masses (MJ) total mass, assuming the canonical gas-to-dust ratio of 100. Dust masses are known to decline with age (Ansdell et al. 2017) so we start our discs with a range of masses (cid:54) 100 MJ, this being close to the maximum permitted value for gravitational stability. For q = 0.5, γ = 1 and thus the surface density scales as Σ ∝ R−1 for R < RC. As part of our parameter exploration in Section 5, we relax the assumptions that q = 0.5 and that the disc starts in the similarity solution appropriate to its viscosity (i.e. with 2 − q), instead letting it adjust to the steady state. In all cases, γ = 3 we evolve the viscous diffusion equation for the gas using a grid equispaced in R1/2 between Rin = 0.1 au and Rout = 400 au. We follow the Birnstiel et al. (2012) model in approximating the dust as two populations: a small population of fixed monomer size a0 = 0.1 µm at which all the dust starts, and a large population whose maximum size amax is governed by prescriptions for particle growth and limits set by either fragmentation or radial drift: we MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 3 and stellar mass) from the FRIED grid of Haworth et al. (2018b). Note that the grid has an artificially imposed lower limit on the mass loss rates of (cid:219)M = 10−10 M(cid:12)yr−1 because the simulations are unreliable below this threshold. At a given outer disc radius, these rates are insensitive to Σout in the limit of high Σout where the wind is optically thick to the incoming FUV radiation but vary linearly with Σout at low Σout where the wind is instead optically thin to the ambient FUV field (Facchini et al. 2016). For this reason we adopt the following interpolation scheme at surface densities outside the range between the lower and upper limits - Σmin(R) and Σmax(R) (both of which scale as R−1) - of the FRIED grid:  (cid:219)Mmax(R) (cid:219)Mmin(R) Σ 10−10M(cid:12)yr−1 Σmin (cid:219)M(R, Σ) = Σ > Σmax Σ < Σmin, (cid:219)Mmin > 10−10M(cid:12)yr−1 Σ < Σmin, (cid:219)Mmin = 10−10M(cid:12)yr−1 (5) where (cid:219)Mmin(R) = (cid:219)M(R, Σmin(R)) and (cid:219)Mmax(R) = (cid:219)M(R, Σmax(R)). Fig. 1 presents an example grid for a solar mass star with FUV flux of 1000 G0 where the red lines denote the limits of parameter space calculated by Haworth et al. (2018b) and the rest of the grid is generated by the above extrapolation. Implementation 2.2.2 A numerical issue in modeling external photoevaporation is that it is necessary to define the outer edge of the disc in order to prescribe the appropriate mass loss rate. If the results of the FRIED grid are applied at face value then, given a typical surface density profile in the disc, the photoevaporation rate would typically increase with chosen outer disc radius as long as the wind is optically thick in the FUV (because the photoevaporation rate increases in weakly bound outer regions) and would then decrease for larger chosen disc radii in the optically thin regime (where the decline is driven by the linear scaling of wind mass loss rate with surface density). This behaviour would imply that the importance of photoevaporation could be very sensitive to the numerical implementation (i.e. to the surface density threshold defining the disc outer edge). However this uncomfortable conclusion neglects the fact that the optically thin FUV rates are not physically self-consistent be- cause they are calculated assuming that the material within the disc outer radius is not allowed to evolve in response to external FUV heating. This assumption is not sustainable if the wind is optically thin to the FUV since in reality the flow would be set by the larger flow rates from smaller radius. In practice this means that the ef- fective outer radius of the disc, which sets the mass loss rate, is located at the optically thick/thin transition, i.e. where the nominal mass loss rate from the FRIED grid attains a maximum value. We illustrate (red line in Fig. 2) the dependence of the nominal (FRIED) photoevaporation rate as a function of designated outer radius for the initial surface density profile of a disc with RC = 100 au and disc mass of 100 MJ, and contrast the decline, beyond ∼ 200 au, with the mass loss in the limit of an optically thick FUV wind (black dashed). In this example, the effective outer radius and correspond- ing mass loss rate would, therefore, in our prescription, be set to ∼ 200 au. Hence, at every timestep we evaluate the disc radius, RD, from the instantaneous surface density profile as the radius where the mass loss rate (cid:219)M(R) (the 'FRIED' mass loss rate calculated at each grid point as though this were the outer radius of the disc) is maximal. (cid:16) RD (cid:17)−1 Figure 1. Interpolation and extrapolation of the mass loss rates. To ensure a smooth variation, the interpolation was performed on RD and the trans- for a star with M∗ = 1 M(cid:12) formed variable M400 = 2πΣout R and an FUV flux of 1000 G0. High mass loss rates (yellow colours) are seen at large radii and high surface densities while lower mass loss rates (darker colours) are seen at small radii or lower surface densities. The red dashed lines represent the limits of the original Haworth et al. (2018b) FRIED grid, outside of which we extrapolate the values according to Equation 5. 400 au 2 D adopt a fragmentation velocity uf = 10 m s−1 (Gundlach & Blum 2015) and an internal dust density of ρs = 1 g cm−3 throughout. The bulk density depends on the composition and porosity of the grains and here we adopt a value appropriate to the composition used in Tazzari et al. (2016) 2. The initial mass fraction of dust is taken to be the canonical value of 1%, inherited from the interstellar medium (Bohlin et al. 1978). Following the evolution of the maximum grain size in the large population, the code re-normalises the grain size distribution in the large population so as to maintain a fixed mass proportion in each population. Each dust population is subject to advection with the viscous flow of the gas plus radial drift with respect to the gas and diffusion which are prescribed as a function of Stokes number St (ratio of drag time to orbital time). In the Epstein drag regime, St is given, for a grain of size a, by: π 2 aρs Σ (4) . St = (see Birnstiel et al. (2012) for further details). We follow Booth et al. (2017) and Tanaka et al. (2005) in incorporating additional terms in the gas evolutionary equations that account for the back-reaction of the dust on the gas although, given the consistently low dust to gas ratios in our models, this is never of any practical importance to the system evolution. 2.2 Treatment of photoevaporation 2.2.1 Calculating the Mass Loss Rates We used the scipy LinearNDInterpolator (Jones et al. 2019) in order to extract photoevaporative mass loss rates (as a function of outer disc radius, RD, outer disc surface density, Σout, ultraviolet flux 2 By volume: 5.4% astronomical silicates, 20.6% carbonaceous material, 44% water ice, and 30% vacuum, which gives an average dust grain density of ∼ 1 g cm−3. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 100101102R/AU10−510−410−310−210−1100101102103Σ/gcm−210−1110−1010−910−810−710−610−510−4MassLossRate(M(cid:12)yr−1)4 A. D. Sellek et al. Figure 2. Mass loss rates for 1000 G0 from the FRIED grid (red solid curve) as a function of designated outer disc radius for a disc with surface density profile given by equation 3, scale radius RC = 100 au and total gas mass MD = 100 Jovian masses. The dashed line gives the corresponding FRIED rates if the wind were optically thick at all radii, demonstrating that the peak in the mass loss rate corresponds to the radius where the wind optical depth is of order unity. In our prescription, the outer edge of the disc, RD and corresponding mass loss rate is set to the value corresponding to this maximum. Having located the region of the disc from which the mass loss is originating we calculate the 'total mass loss' rate via a mass weighted prescription over cells exterior to RD (Mi, (cid:219)Mi are the mass and mass loss rate of the cell i): (cid:219)Mi Mi M(R > RD) . (6) (cid:219)Mtot = i The purpose of this step is to avoid large numerical fluctuations in the mass loss rate as cells are emptied: in practice (cid:219)Mtot will be dominated by the cell at RD (i.e. the maximum mass loss rate), as this has both the largest mass and largest mass loss rate but as this cell is emptied adjacent cells start to contribute to the mass loss rate. Having evaluated the mass loss rate we need to decide the range of cells to which this is applied. To ensure that we can't leave mass outside of the wind base indefinitely, we apply this mass loss rate spread across all cells with R > RD (i.e. outside of the disc's designated radius) in proportion to the mass they contain. (cid:219)Meff,i = (cid:219)Mtot (7) Mi M(R > RD) . Note that the models were stopped when no mass loss rate was found in the grid that was above the floor of 10−10 M(cid:12) yr−1 imposed by Haworth et al. (2018b). 2.2.3 Photoevaporation of Dust Photoevaporation results in a wind whose radial velocity vr relates to the mass loss rate (cid:219)M through (Adams et al. 2004) (cid:219)M = 4πR2F ρgvr . (8) This represents a spherical radial flow over a solid angle 4πF , where the geometric factor F = tends towards the aspect ratio (H/R) for thin discs. This radial motion produces a drag force on a H√ R 2+H 2 dust particle of radius a of 1 3 a2 (cid:219)M R2F , (9) vth FD = where vth is the thermal velocity of the gas. For a star of mass M∗, the gravitational force on a dust grain is FG = − GM∗ R2 Setting FD > FG, we find that the drag is only able to overcome the gravitational force for particles smaller than the maximum entrained size aent (Facchini et al. 2016): 4π 3 ρsa3 (10) a < aent = vth GM∗ (cid:219)M 4πF ρs . (11) (cid:34) (cid:19)4−p(cid:35) (cid:18) aent amax Any dust that is smaller than this entrained size can be blown away by the wind. We now work out the entrained mass fraction fent, assuming a size distribution where the number of grains of sizes between a and a + da is n(a)da ∝ a−pda. Following Haworth et al. (2018a), we assume a MRN distribution (Mathis et al. 1977) with p = 3.5, even though such a distribution is probably only appropriate for a collisional distribution, such as fragmentation limited dust. Although Birnstiel et al. (2012) suggests that drift limited dust has a size distribution with mass more concentrated towards larger sizes i.e. p < 3.5, in Section 5, we confirm that in fact our results are insensitive to the value of p and we may safely take p = 3.5 as a fiducial value. fent = min 1, . (12) Md,i Mi (cid:219)Meff,i . The mass in dust removed from a cell is thus fent times the mass in gas that is driven off in the wind multiplied by the dust-to-gas : ratio Md,i Mi (cid:219)M,i = fent,i Although small dust could in principle be preferentially removed, the code maintains a fixed ratio of the mass contained in the larger and small grain populations. We are able to do this because, as described above and in Section 5, the effects of entrainment in the wind are insensitive to the grain size distribution since the majority of the dust is lost while the grains are small, at which point all grain sizes can be removed. A similar assumption is made by the model of Birnstiel et al. (2012) in updating the mass fraction in each population in each cell after recalculating the sizes and applying the radial drift. (13) 3 GAS EVOLUTION We have run a suite of gas-only models in order to compare with previous studies, confirming that the key behaviours seen in Clarke (2007) still occur in our new model set using the updated prescrip- tions of Haworth et al. (2018b). Specifically we confirm that the late time (i.e. on a few Myr) behaviour of discs with fixed FUV flux and α value is rather insensitive to the initial value of the scale radius, RC. Small discs (Fig. 3a) start by viscously spreading un- til they reach the point where their outer radius shrinks with time due to photoevaporation. Conversely, an initially extended disc (Fig. 3b) may shrink throughout its lifetime due to photoevaporation; the dominance of photoevaporation over viscous spreading is strong MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 100101102R/AU10−1010−910−810−710−610−5M/M(cid:12)yr−1OpticallythickOpticallythinRD100MJ,100AUdiscOpticallythicklimitenough that disc shrinkage may be more or less what it would be in the absence of viscosity. At late times, however, both simulations converge on the same tracks and the mass loss rates due to photo- evaporation and viscous accretion decline in tandem as shown in Fig. 3a and 3b (cf. Figures 2 and 3 of Clarke 2007). This represents a state of self-adjustment where the evolution of the disc radius is such that the photoevaporative wind can remove the outward flux of material associated with viscous accretion on to the star (note that the disc outer edge is, in the strongly photoevaporated state, located at a small multiple of the disc half mass radius and so removal of the angular momentum from the accretion flow involves a wind mass loss rate that is similar to the accretion rate). Secondly, as noted above, we find that the evolution of large discs (i.e. those that shrink throughout their evolution) is rather insensitive to α but depends on the FUV flux, with discs shrink- ing more rapidly in the presence of stronger FUV fields. Fig. 4 shows how as we go to higher FUV fields, the radii of the discs are increasingly convergent between models with different α. This behaviour can be understood in terms of discs where viscous evo- lution is initially sub-dominant (due to the long viscous times and short photoevaporation times) and so the disc is eroded at a rate that mainly depends on the efficacy of photoevaporation, which is a very strong function of radius. Initially small discs, conversely, start off by viscously expanding and therefore the time at which they attain maximum radius depends on α (and also on the FUV flux, note how for α = 10−2 the radius is still increasing between 0.5 and 1 Myr in Fig. 4 at G0 = 10 but has stalled elsewhere) since this controls how quickly they reach the point at which photoevaporation becomes competitive with viscous evolution and hence the outward expan- sion is halted. See Clarke (2007); Haworth et al. (2018a); Winter et al. (2019b) for further discussion of the evolution of gas in discs subject to external photoevaporation. 4 DUST EVOLUTION IN PHOTOEVAPORATING DISCS There are three key processes that remove dust from the disc, thus contributing to the observed decline in dust masses with age (e.g. Ansdell et al. 2017). These are: accretion following the viscous motion of the gas, radial drift due to drag from the gas, and pho- toevaporation due to FUV irradiation. We now assess the relative contribution of each to the dust depletion and their respective time- scales. In this section we first examine a fiducial model of a 100 MJ, RC = 100 au disc with α = 10−3 around a 1 M(cid:12) star in order to understand the key phases in the evolution of such discs. In the absence of photoevaporation or radial drift, dust would, in this fiducial simulation, be lost to the star by viscous accretion on a time- scale of 10 Myr. Since photoevaporation and radial drift compete to remove dust at a different rate to the gas, we examine three scenarios in order to assess their relative importance: model RD, with radial drift but no photoevaporation, model PE, with photoevaporation (1000 G0) but no radial drift, and model RDPE with both radial drift and photoevaporation. Fig. 5 shows (from left to right) the dust evolution of Models RDPE, RD and PE, tracking the dust mass radii (defined as the radii containing 80 and 90 per cent of the dust mass at that time), the fractions of the initial dust mass that end up in different locations, the accretion and photoevaporation mass loss rates and the over-all dust to gas ratio of the remaining disc, Md/MD. In the absence of photoevaporation, the dust, which starts off small and hence well entrained everywhere, grows quickly in the MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 5 inner disc and starts radially drifting after around 104 yr. Since this results in the innermost parts of the dust distribution being lost to the star, the 80th and 90th percentiles initially move outward. Radial drift causes the mass of dust to decline rapidly around 0.1−0.2 Myr, though the small dust component provides a reservoir that lasts for 3.2 Myr. Once most of the mass in the disc is drifting, the percentiles move inwards (Rosotti et al. 2019b). The significant fall in the global dust mass fraction is a well known problem for models incorporating radial drift (Takeuchi et al. 2005; Brauer et al. 2008; Birnstiel et al. 2012; Pinilla et al. 2012) unless the disc's turbulent viscosity is high enough for fragmentation to keep the bulk of the dust grains small and hence well coupled to the gas. The left hand panel of Fig. 6 illustrates the evolution of the radial profile of mid-plane dust to gas ratio3 in the absence of photoevaporation. Conversely, in model PE, the dust radius follows the gas radius which, in this simulation, falls monotonically after the first ∼ 103 years due to photoevaporation. The preferential removal of gas com- pared with dust is indicated by a small rise in the dust to gas ratio in the residual disc. This simulation (in which dust is not allowed to migrate) represents the case of maximal entrainment of dust in the wind, with the total dust lost to the wind exceeding that accreted on to the star by a factor ∼ 3 − 4. The time-scale for dust depletion is however rather longer than in model RD. When both radial drift and photoevaporation are included in model RDPE, we see quite different behaviour. The loss of dust to the wind ceases sharply around 0.06 Myr - the red line in the second left hand panel of Fig. 5 flattens out. This time is marked with the first black vertical dotted line at around 0.06 Myr. After this point, the dust in the disc is rapidly depleted by radial drift on to the star within a further 0.1 − 0.2 Myr, marked with the second dotted line. The central panel of Fig. 6 depicts the evolution of the profile of mid- plane dust to gas ratio in this case: comparison with the left hand panel (radial drift, no photoevaporation) demonstrates that the dust to gas ratio falls significantly more rapidly when photoevaporation is included because the previous erosion of the outer dust disc by photoevaporation means that there is a reduced reservoir for re- supply of dust by radial inflow at the point in the evolution (∼ 0.1 Myr) when radial drift becomes important. This lower dust to gas ratio in the presence of photoevaporation reduces particle growth and hence both the maximum grain size and the associated Stokes number are lower than in the case with radial drift alone (see Fig. 7). The onset of radial draining of the large dust component can be understood by considering the relative speeds of radial drift and viscous motions. Following Birnstiel et al. (2012), we may define Steq as the Stokes number where the radial drift velocity of the dust equals the viscous speed of the material (whether inwardly or outwardly directed). The gradient of the surface density enters the latter through the gradient of the torque and the former through the gradient of the pressure. Given our imposed models for the temperature, (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) 3 2 + d ln Σ d ln R 4 − d ln Σ 7 d ln R (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) . Steq = 3α (14) where Σ ∝ R−1 in the inner disc, Steq → 6 11 α (Birnstiel et al. 2012). Here both velocities are inwards, but we can still use Steq to quantify whether the radial drift or viscous dynamics are dominant. In the 3 Note that the calculation of the mid-plane dust to gas ratio from the vertically averaged quantity accounts for vertical settling of dust: see Youdin & Lithwick 2007, Birnstiel et al 2012. 6 A. D. Sellek et al. (a) Initially small (RC = 10 au) disc. (b) Initially large (RC = 100 au) disc. Figure 3. The photoevaporative mass loss rate (dashed) and the accretion rate at the inner boundary (solid) as a function of age for models with α = 10−3 and FUV = 1000 G0. The vertical purple line indicates the viscous time-scale of each model at RC. dominates the evolution of the dust radii, top row of Fig. 5, at late times. Note that unlike the case with no radial drift, the global dust mass fraction decreases steadily with time. By the time that the dust is not perfectly entrained in the flow, significant amounts are already being lost to radial drift. This suggests that photoevaporation is unlikely to resolve the discrepancy between our radial drift model, and the increased dust mass fractions observed by e.g. Ansdell et al. (2016). Finally we stress that the combination of photoevaporation and radial drift can shorten the lifetime of dust in the disc by over an order of magnitude compared with models that involve only photoevaporation or only radial drift. We discuss the implications of this result for the demographics of observed discs (Section 6) and for planet formation (Section 7). Figure 4. The disc radius as a function of the UV environment for a α = 10−3 (dashed) and 10−2 (solid) taken at 0.5 Myr (blue) and 1 Myr (red). outer disc, the viscous velocity is outwards and d ln Σ/d ln R (cid:29) 1, thus Steq → 3α. Note that somewhere in the middle, where d ln Σ/d ln R → −3/2, we transition from viscously accreting to spreading regimes and Steq → 0 (because, where the viscous speed is close to zero, radial drift is dominant even for tightly coupled grains). If dust at the disc edge grows beyond Steq ∼ 3α, its net velocity is inwards - no amount of viscous spreading can overcome the radial drift. The viscous spreading at the edge of the disc can no longer replenish the dust to the wind base - the dust escapes the wind through radial drift to smaller radii. This effectively shuts off the loss of dust to the wind. At this point, since the radial drift time-scale at the maxi- mum grain size is less than the viscous time-scale, this dust rapidly depletes on to the star, leaving only the residual 'small dust' com- ponent which remains well coupled to the gas (and whose evolution 5 PARAMETER EXPLORATION We now examine a grid of model results, focusing on the eventual destination of the dust (i.e. accretion onto the star or mass loss in the wind) and associated time-scales for disc depletion. The overwhelmingly important parameter in determining the fraction of the dust mass lost to the wind and the associated time- scales for dust depletion is the ultra-violet flux level (see right hand panel of Fig. 8 and Table 1). This result is readily explicable in terms of the higher temperatures and greater penetration depth in the case of more intense FUV fields. Nevertheless it is notable that the maximum fraction of dust lost to the wind is ∼ 65 per cent and thus the wind is never the overwhelmingly dominant destination for the dust. The division of dust between accretion on to the star and loss in the wind approaches 50 : 50 for G0 ∼ 1000 but does not rise steeply for higher fluxes. 4 4 In fact, for most viscosities, the fraction of dust lost to the wind decreases slightly at the highest modelled FUV fluxes of 104 G0. This is because MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 103104105106107Time/years10−1010−910−8M/M(cid:12)yr−1MaccMevap103104105106107Time/years10−1010−910−810−7M/M(cid:12)yr−1MaccMevap101102103104FUVFlux/G0050100150200250300350400Radius/AUα=10−3,0.5Myrα=10−2,0.5Myrα=10−3,1.0Myrα=10−2,1.0MyrDust evolution in photoevaporating discs 7 Figure 5. From left to right: Model RDPE including radial drift and photoevaporation, Model RD including radial drift but no photoevaporation and Model PE including photoevaporation but no radial drift. The panels show, from top: the radius of the 90 per cent (orange) and 80 per cent (red) percentiles of the dust mass distribution with the radius of the gas disc (black, dashed) for reference; the mass in dust left in the disc (blue), lost to the wind (red) and lost to the star (green); the global dust mass fraction; the gas mass loss rate through accretion (solid) and photoevaporation (dashed). In addition, the time of the dust at the wind base beginning to radially drift in and having cleared the disc are shown as the two black dotted lines. Note the linear scale on the bottom right plot due to the small variation in the dust mass fraction. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 0255075100125150175DustRadius/AUFullModel80.0%90.0%RD150200250300350400DustRadius/AUNoPhotoevaporation406080100120140160180DustRadius/AUNoDrift0.00.20.40.60.8DustMassMd/MJMassleftinDiscMasslosttoWindMasslosttoStar0.00.20.40.60.81.0DustMassMd/MJ0.00.20.40.60.8DustMassMd/MJ10−1010−910−810−710−6M/M(cid:12)yr−1MaccMevap10−82×10−93×10−94×10−96×10−9M/M(cid:12)yr−110−1010−910−810−710−6M/M(cid:12)yr−1103104105106107Time/years10−510−410−310−2DustMassFractionMd/MD103104105106107Time/years10−410−310−2DustMassFractionMd/MD103104105106107Time/years0.01000.01020.01040.01060.01080.0110DustMassFractionMd/MD8 A. D. Sellek et al. Figure 6. Contour plots of the midplane dust-to-gas ratio ρd/ρg(z = 0) for L: a model without photoevaporation, C: a model with an FUV flux of 1000 G0, R: the same but with high α. Light orange to yellow colours represent enhancement over 0.01 while purple and blue colours represent a lower ratio. Figure 7. Effect of Photoevaporation on L: the maximum Stokes number, R: the maximum dust grain size. Shown in each panel are the values for the model with G0 = 1000 normalised by the values for the model with no photoevaporation. The dashed black line is the radius at the base of the photoevaporative wind. After 0.1 − 1 Myr, consistently low Stokes numbers are seen. These correlate to the onset of lower sizes of dust. At later times, the sizes are further suppressed due to lowered gas surface densities. Another readily explicable result is that the importance of photoevaporation (both in terms of fraction of dust leaving in the wind and a short depletion time-scale) is somewhat greater for lower mass stars (Table 2). This simply derives from the shallower potential and hence lower requirement on the escape velocity for low mass stars. The fraction of the dust that is lost in the wind increases with the initial disc scale radius (Table 3). This is as expected since at larger radii and high G0, the mass loss rates in the FRIED grid are not monotonic with the FUV flux (see Figure 3 of Haworth et al. (2018b)), which these authors attribute to the critical radius of the wind coinciding with the hydrogen ionisation front. This slight decline does not affect the monotonic decrease of the depletion timescale with G0 in Table 1 but, since much of the dust mass is lost at early times when the disc is large, can slightly decrease the fraction of dust lost in the wind. for smaller discs the time-scale for growth and radial migration of dust grains is smaller while photoevaporation rates are lower from locations deeper within the stellar potential. The depletion time is less sensitive to initial scale radius because the interplay between photoevaporation and viscous evolution leads to a convergence in the evolution of disc radius at late times. By contrast the initial disc mass has almost no effect on the fate of the dust and the influence on the time-scale (which is defined as time required to attain a fixed fraction of the initial dust mass) is likewise weak (Table 4). In more massive discs the dust has to grow to larger size scales before it undergoes strong radial drift and this very mildly favours dust loss in the wind. There is generally a mild positive relationship between dust loss in the wind and the value of α (see Table 5 and Fig. 8). This partly reflects the fact that at higher viscosity the disc gas is more vigorously fed into the wind-launching zone but also because the MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 10−1100101102Radius/AU103104105106107Time/yearsα=0.001,FUV=0G010−1100101102Radius/AU103104105106107α=0.001,FUV=1000G010−1100101102Radius/AU103104105106107α=0.010,FUV=1000G010−610−410−2100ρd/ρg(z=0)10−1100101102Radius/AU103104105106Time/yearsRelativeStokesNumberWindBase10−1100101102Radius/AU103104105106Time/yearsRelativeGrainSize10−310−210−1100Ratio(1000G0/0G0)Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 9 Figure 8. Effect of viscosity and FUV flux on dust loss to wind. L: fwind as a function of α. Each colour represents a different FUV flux. R: the plane of α and FUV flux, showing strong dependence on FUV flux at all α. The colour represents fwind values running from 0.00 (blue) to 0.80 (red). Figure 9. The Stokes number of the maximum dust size, Stmax (blue) compared to that for which the background viscous advection velocity and radial drift velocity are equal, Steq (green) given by Equation 14. The black dashed/dashed-dotted lines represent the limits of this expression. The left hand panel shows the low viscosity α = 10−3 model after 6.31 × 104 yr and the right shows the high viscosity α = 10−2 model after 7.94 × 104 yr - these were the snapshots with the highest value of Stmax at the disc edge. dust in this region is less efficiently flushed inwards by radial drift. The latter contribution is illustrated in Fig. 9 which plots the radial profile of the Stokes number at the point that the Stokes number at the wind base is a maximum for the cases of simulations with α = 0.001 and 0.01. Fig. 9 also depicts, in each case, the profile of the Stokes number for which the inward radial drift speed is equal to the magnitude of the viscous speed in the disc (Steq, as defined by Eq 14). Clearly in the low viscosity case the dust can drift inwards on less than the viscous time-scale, whereas for high viscosity, fragmentation keeps the grains small and the radial motion of the dust is well coupled to the viscous flow of the gas. The right hand panel of Fig. 6 demonstrates the milder evolution of the dust to gas ratio in the case of a higher viscosity model. For low-medium α values, the dependence on α is thus very weak because the dust takes the same time to grow to the point that radial drift removes it from the wind base. At higher α, the MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) reduction in grain sizes due to fragmentation starts to suppress radial drift and hence the dependence on α becomes steeper. Only at the highest values, above those typically inferred from observations (e.g. Rafikov 2017), does the fraction of dust lost start to decrease again. This is because the grains are already tightly coupled to the gas, thus limiting the improvement possible, but viscous accretion becomes a competitive sink for the material. In line with this, we see that the depletion timescale first rises, as radial drift becomes less effective, and decreases again once viscous accretion becomes effective. We also vary the parameter γ that determines the initial den- sity profile, and q that determines the temperature profile, trying a steeper profile for each, and starting both in and out of the steady state (Table 6). Changing the temperature profile changes the vis- cosity, so so long as drift dominates the dust motions, changing the temperature profile alone has little effect on the dust fates and 10−410−310−210−1α0.00.20.40.60.81.0fwindFUVFlux/G0:0.010.0100.01000.010000.0101102103104FUVFlux/G010−410−310−210−1α0.000.160.320.480.640.80fwind10−1100101R/AU10−510−410−310−210−1Stα=0.001;t=6.31×104yr10−1100101102R/AU10−510−410−310−210−1Stα=0.01;t=7.94×104yrStmaxSteqOuterlimitInnerlimit10 A. D. Sellek et al. lifetimes. The slope of the surface density has a larger effect - for γ = 3/2, the material is more centrally concentrated and so is de- pleted by drift more rapidly, thus reducing the efficacy of the wind at removing the dust. When γ = 3/4 is adopted in line with the steady state solution for q = 3/4, the material is now less centrally concentrated, aiding removal by the wind. The depletion time-scale is less-affected, in all cases lying within 0.2 ± 0.05 Myr. Finally, we check some properties of the dust model. At both high and low α, we calculated fent (Equation 12) using a more top heavy dust size distribution with slope p = 2.5. We find that the entrained fractions change by a fraction of a per cent compared to those in Table 5 - so the results are robust against uncertainties in the grain size distribution. The reason for this insensitivity is that at low α, dust loss is curtailed not by grains being too large to be entrained in the wind but through being subject to efficient radial drift. Thus dust loss occurs only while grains are still small and fent = 1. At high α, the dust loss is ultimately controlled by the supply of dust to the wind base by viscous spreading, again making the amount of mass entrained insensitive to the grain size distribution. We also test the impact of starting all the dust in our fiducial model at its limiting size, rather than letting it grow from the monomer size of 0.1 µm. This does not change the qualitative behaviour, but since previously dust was largely lost during the growth phase before radial drift set in, fwind reduces by a factor ∼ 2 from 0.43 to 0.18. If dust grains are processed in the formation of the disc and hence start out larger than we assume, we should thus expect fwind to be reduced by a factor (cid:46) 2. 6 DISCUSSION: PREDICTIONS FOR DISC DEMOGRAPHICS The suite of results presented above, as summarised in Table 1, implies that photoevaporation clearly reduces the lifetime of both the gas and the dust in protoplanetary discs. The time-scale on which 99 per cent of the dust is lost from the disc is reduced as a result of photoevaporation even when (as in the majority of cases) only a relatively minor component of the dust (few 10s of per cent) is actually removed in the wind (see Fig. 8). The main effect that causes photoevaporation to reduce the dust lifetime is that the wind's early removal of dust from the outer disc then prevents later replenishment of the inner disc as it becomes dust depleted on account of radial drift. Observational data on the demographics of protoplanetary discs provides information on not only the average lifetimes of discs (Haisch et al. 2001; Ingleby et al. 2012; Ribas et al. 2015) but also on the relative lifetimes of the dust and gas components (e.g. Fedele et al. (2010)). In general there is a reasonably strong correlation between those stars that exhibit a near infrared excess from warm dust and those that manifest accretion on to the star. Fedele et al. (2010) found similar time-scales for the decline of dust and gas, arguing for a slightly longer duration of the infrared excess phase compared with the lifetime over which accretion proceeds at a detectable level (i.e. in excess of 10−11 M(cid:12) yr−1). We have run a large suite of models with a range of initial disc masses and scale radii subjected to varying levels of ultraviolet background radiation at both high and low viscosities, all around a 1 M(cid:12) star. Fig. 10 plots the results of these models in the plane of accretion lifetime against near infrared excess lifetime where the former denotes the time over which accretion on to the star exceeds 10−11 M(cid:12) yr−1 and the latter the lifetime over which the disc is Key model outcomes. fwind and fstar represent the mass fraction of the dust lost to the wind and the fraction of the dust lost onto the star through viscous accretion or radial drift respectively. tdep is the time after which only 1% of the initial dust mass remains. Table 1. Models with varying FUV flux. FUV Flux (G0) 0 10 100 1000 10000 fwind 0.000 0.104 0.211 0.429 0.383 fstar 0.998 0.896 0.789 0.571 0.617 tdep (Myr) 3.181 1.026 0.604 0.219 0.146 Table 2. Models with varying stellar mass. M∗ (M(cid:12)) 0.5 1.0 1.9 fwind 0.557 0.429 0.259 fstar 0.443 0.571 0.741 tdep (Myr) 0.122 0.219 0.376 Table 3. Models with varying scale radius. RC (au) 10 30 100 300 fwind 0.003 0.096 0.429 0.584 fstar 0.997 0.904 0.571 0.416 tdep (Myr) 0.151 0.250 0.219 0.190 Table 4. Models with varying initial disc mass. MD (MJ) 100 30 10 3 1 fwind 0.429 0.394 0.362 0.379 0.337 fstar 0.571 0.606 0.638 0.621 0.663 tdep (Myr) 0.219 0.193 0.183 0.208 0.211 Table 5. Models with varying viscosity (α). α 1 × 10−4 3 × 10−4 1 × 10−3 3 × 10−3 1 × 10−2 3 × 10−2 1 × 10−1 fwind 0.420 0.418 0.429 0.458 0.595 0.676 0.626 fstar 0.580 0.582 0.571 0.542 0.404 0.323 0.374 tdep (Myr) 0.213 0.214 0.219 0.325 0.659 0.271 0.113 Table 6. Models with varying power law indices for temperature (q) and initial surface density (γ): see equations 1 and 3 q 0.5 0.5 0 0.75 0.75 γ 1 3/2 3/2 1 3/4 Initially Steady State? Y N Y N Y fwind 0.429 0.276 0.302 0.424 0.480 fstar 0.571 0.724 0.697 0.574 0.520 tdep (Myr) 0.219 0.198 0.157 0.230 0.231 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 11 other hand when the FUV flux is below ∼ 1000 G0 the relationship between dust and gas lifetime depends on the value of the viscous α parameter. Broadly speaking this is because at high α (10−2), tur- bulent fragmentation keeps grains small and well coupled to the gas and thus the lifetimes in the two diagnostics are comparable. When α is reduced by an order of magnitude, the gas lifetime increases since, regardless of the strength of the FUV field, viscous evolution is the main agent of disc clearing. On the other hand, the lowered turbulence allows dust to grow to sizes where it is subject to strong radial drift and hence the dust lifetime decreases. Thus lowering α results in models moving towards the lower right of the plot where the gas lifetime substantially exceeds the lifetime of the dust. It is interesting that, while the absolute lifetime is a strong function of FUV flux, the relationship between dust and gas lifetimes is predominantly controlled by α. At face value the observed near equality of dust and gas lifetimes argues for the higher α value; we emphasise that the magnitude of this problem (the high ratio of gas to dust lifetime at low α) is unaffected by the level of FUV flux except in regions with the highest background levels. We note however, that the NIR lifetime and accreting lifetime trace the presence of the dust and the dynamics of the gas in the inner disc, so other effects - such as gap opening by planets, which can disrupt the supply of material to the inner disc (e.g. Armitage & Hansen 1999), or internal photoevaporation, which may lead to photoevaporation- starved accretion and gap opening (Drake et al. 2009; Owen et al. 2011) - may instead impart a similar lifetime on both observables. We have also examined the effect of photoevaporation on disc fluxes and radii at submm wavelengths. Here we follow the obser- vational study of Tripathi et al. (2017) by plotting model trajecto- ries in the plane of R68 (the radius enclosing 68 per cent of the flux at 850 µm) versus the corresponding flux (assuming that all sources are at a distance of 140 pc). On the right hand scale we indicate the inferred disc mass based on calculating the dust masses from the mm fluxes following the commonly used prescription of Hildebrand (1983); Beckwith et al. (1990) and further assuming a canonical gas to dust ratio of 100 to get a total mass; since in our models we observe severe dust depletion due to radial drift, and use different, spatially variable opacities and temperatures, these do not necessarily reflect the actual disc masses. In the absence of photo- evaporation, the model trajectories reproduce the results of Rosotti et al. (2019a). Sources evolve towards lower fluxes and radii with time, an effect that can be understood in terms of the inward migra- tion of the radius (termed Rcliff by Rosotti et al. (2019a)) outside which the grains are sufficiently small (< 0.1 mm) so as to present a strongly reduced opacity at submm wavelengths. As discussed by Rosotti et al. (2019a), the trajectories differ in detail depending on whether the maximum grain size is set predominantly by radial drift (low α) or fragmentation (high α). Rosotti et al. (2019a) argue that the observational data is better reproduced by the former tracks and indeed the trajectory of the 'drift locus' is well aligned with the mean observed relationship (Tripathi et al. 2017, Andrews et al. 2018: we indicate the ±1σ interval of the observed data from these surveys as the blue band in Fig. 11). The only new element in our calculations (in the absence of photoevaporation) compared with those presented in Rosotti et al. (2019a) is that we have pursued the evolution for longer and see that at late times the tracks move towards larger R68 again. This is because Rcliff becomes sufficiently small that it moves within R68 as the flux originating from the low opacity region outside Rcliff becomes significant. In the case of low α, R68 grows thereafter due to the shrinking of the region interior to Rcliff and hence the reduction of the relative flux contribution from Figure 10. Suite of model results in the plane of accretion lifetime versus lifetime of near infrared excess. The symbol colour denotes FUV flux while the symbol shape differentiates simulations with α = 10−2 (square) and 10−3 (circle). The black borders are directly obtained from the simulations whereas the blue and green borders denote models where an extrapolation is involved in the accretion rate and both the accretion rate and 2 µm optical depth respectively (see text). The dashed line indicates equality of time- scales. optically thick at 2 µm at a radius of 1 au 5. Note that we only pursue the calculations to the point where the photoevaporation rate declines to the minimum value covered by the FRIED grid and that this can occur before the above criteria are satisfied. In such cases we linearly extrapolate the decline in 2 µm optical depth and accretion rate (considering log accretion rate and log 2 µm optical depth versus linear time and log time respectively) in order to estimate the dust and gas lifetimes. The extrapolated lifetimes generally exceed the point at which the photoevaporation declines to the minimum grid value by a factor of order unity. It can be seen from Fig. 10 that, as expected, lifetimes in both dust and gas decline as the FUV background is increased. The very short lifetimes at high flux levels (e.g. 104 G0 as in the core of the Orion Nebula Cluster) are well known and are the origin of the 'proplyd lifetime problem' (Henney & O'Dell 1999) 6. At flux levels above ∼ 1000 G0 the dust and gas lifetimes are comparable. This means that dynamical studies in highly irradiated environments (e.g. Scally & Clarke (2001) for the ONC or Winter et al. (2019b) for Cygnus OB2) which measure disc lifetimes from gas-only cal- culations can still be compared with dust based diagnostics. On the 5 The optical depth is computed as in Rosotti et al. (2019a,b), i.e. using the opacity of Tazzari et al. (2016) 6 Note that while we present the analysis here in terms of the disappearance of the near infrared excess emission, which is a widely measured quantity, we have also examined the decline in submm flux. Our results confirm that even initially massive discs, when exposed to the FUV levels experienced in the core of the Orion Nebula Cluster, are expected to remain above the detection threshold of recent high sensitivity ALMA surveys of the region (Eisner et al. 2018) for less than a Myr. Given the large fraction of discs that are detected at this FUV level, this strengthens the argument that the disc sources in the core of the Orion Nebula Cluster must have been exposed to the current FUV field for a relatively short period in the past and that the proplyd phenomenon is likely to be short lived. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 10−1100101102103tacc:TimeforMacc<10−11M(cid:12)yr−1/Myr10−1100101102103tNIR:TimeofDisappearanceinNIR/MyrBorderColourExactvaluesExtrapolated(tacc)Extrapolated(both)MarkerStyleα=10−2α=10−3MarkerStyleα=10−2α=10−30101102103104FUVFlux/G012 A. D. Sellek et al. Figure 11. Trajectories of models in the plane of disc flux 68th centile radius versus flux (at a distance of 140 pc), both evaluated at 850 µm. Left hand panel: α = 10−3, Right hand panel: α = 10−2. A black dot on each model locus indicates the properties at an age of 1 Myr. Observational data is from Eisner et al. (2018) in the case of discs residing in the highly irradiated environment of the Orion Nebula Cluster (with fluxes rescaled to a distance of 140 pc). The blue band is the mean relation and ±1σ extent of data assembled in Tripathi et al. (2017), Andrews et al. (2018) for regions with low photoevaporation levels. On the right hand scale we indicate the total disc mass that an observer would infer if they made canonical assumptions about the dust to gas ratio and opacity (see text): we enphasise that this scale is merely given to ease comparison with observed systems and does not correspond to the actual disc masses in the model, on account of the spatially variable opacity and dust to gas ratio in our modeling. within small radii. At high α the re-expansion of R68 is a result of viscous expansion of the low opacity region outside Rcliff. This behaviour is modified at late times when photoevapora- tion is included. For low α, the evolution is qualitatively similar except that dust loss to the wind at early times results in more rapid depletion of solids by radial drift outside Rcliff, and smaller maxi- mum grain sizes, as illustrated in Figures 7 and 8. This means that the region interior to Rcliff continues to dominate the flux down to lower Rcliff values and hence sources attain a smaller minimum ra- dius before re-expansion. Fig. 11 shows that the radius from which R68 starts to re-expand depends on G0 but is relatively insensitive to the disc mass or initial radius. In the context of such low α models, a compact disc (R68 < 20 au) would imply either a very compact ini- tial configuration (initial RC < 30 au) or else a wide range of initial disc sizes and radii combined with an ultraviolet field > 100 G0. For high α models, the smaller grains mean that more dust is retained beyond Rcliff and hence the flux outside Rcliff dominates at late times. There is however no viscous expansion of R68 at this point since the outer edge of the disc is set by the wind base. At this stage the disc flux slowly declines as a result of viscous accretion of small dust on to the star but R68 remains approximately constant. For high α models as well, therefore, a long lived population of small discs (R68 < 20 au) is a hallmark of the importance of photoevaporation. We also plot in Fig. 11 the observational data of Eisner et al. (2018) for the Orion Nebula Cluster (using flux values from which the estimated contributions from free-free emission have been sub- tracted as in Eisner et al. (2018) and further computing equivalent flux values for a nominal distance of 140 pc). In contrast to the regions observed by Tripathi et al. (2017), Andrews et al. (2018) (whose data is represented by the blue band in Fig. 11), the Orion Nebula Cluster is a highly irradiated region with estimated flux levels ranging from > 105 G0 to < 1000 G0 (though with some uncertainty based on the level of internal extinction in the cluster). We see that the observational data from the Orion Nebula Cluster is broadly consistent with the low α models. At G0 = 104, these models are brighter at a given disc size compared with non- irradiated models because photoevaporation drives more rapid disc shrinkage and there is less time for the residual disc to drain its dust by radial drift 7. The observed data also includes objects that lie at larger sizes and lower flux values than would be predicted by our high G0 models, though these may be attributable to objects that, due to a mixture of extinction and projection effects, experience a lower FUV flux. Finally, we note (from the absence of black 1 Myr markers on the models with G0 = 104 that the disc shrinkage is extremely rapid at these flux levels. This is a re-statement of the well-known 'proplyd lifetime problem' in Orion, whose solution is generally held to imply that observed discs in Orion have been exposed to such strong ultraviolet fields over a small fraction of the cluster lifetime (see e.g. Winter et al. (2019a) and references therein). 7 Note that for the high α models, where radial drift is less efficient, the predicted submm fluxes at given disc size for G0 = 104 are even higher and in excess of those observed MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 101102R68/AU10−410−310−210−1100101850.0µmFlux/Jyα=10−3101102R68/AU10−410−310−210−1100101α=10−2StartAndrews+(2018)1.0MyrEisner+(2018)StartAndrews+(2018)1.0MyrEisner+(2018)10−210−110010110210−210−1100101102InferredMass/MJ0G0,30MJ,10AU0G0,30MJ,30AU0G0,30MJ,100AU0G0,10MJ,100AU0G0,100MJ,100AU100G0,30MJ,10AU100G0,30MJ,30AU100G0,30MJ,100AU100G0,10MJ,100AU100G0,100MJ,100AU1000G0,30MJ,10AU1000G0,30MJ,30AU1000G0,30MJ,100AU1000G0,10MJ,100AU1000G0,100MJ,100AU10000G0,30MJ,10AU10000G0,30MJ,30AU10000G0,30MJ,100AU10000G0,10MJ,100AU10000G0,100MJ,100AU0G0,30MJ,10AU0G0,30MJ,30AU0G0,30MJ,100AU0G0,10MJ,100AU0G0,100MJ,100AU100G0,30MJ,10AU100G0,30MJ,30AU100G0,30MJ,100AU100G0,10MJ,100AU100G0,100MJ,100AU1000G0,30MJ,10AU1000G0,30MJ,30AU1000G0,30MJ,100AU1000G0,10MJ,100AU1000G0,100MJ,100AU10000G0,30MJ,10AU10000G0,30MJ,30AU10000G0,30MJ,100AU10000G0,10MJ,100AU10000G0,100MJ,100AUConsequently, we conclude that in order for a range of FUV fluxes to reproduce the spread in the observational data from the Orion Nebula Cluster, the discs subject to a high G0 must be very young, whereas those in milder environments should be older than 1 Myr. This is consistent with the arguments of Winter et al. (2019a) that for sufficiently low star formation efficiencies, dynamical en- counters lead to preferentially younger systems in higher G0 envi- ronments, and that interstellar extinction early in the cluster's evo- lution could have ensured that older systems have stayed in lower G0 environments throughout their evolution. 7 DISCUSSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANET FORMATION Rocky planet formation is likely to require enhancement of the mid-plane dust to gas ratio to of order of a few tens of per cent in order to be able to trigger the streaming instability and conse- quent gravitational fragmentation of the dust layer. Several authors have suggested that photoevaporation may provide a mechanism for differential gas/dust removal, leaving behind a disc with suitably enhanced solid to gas ratio, conducive to planet formation (Throop & Bally 2005; Carrera et al. 2017). The fact that our simulations do not demonstrate significantly enhanced dust to gas ratio in the inner disc can be readily understood by inspection of the second panel of the leftmost column of Fig. 5. The possible enhancement of the dust to gas ratio only occurs at the point when the dust has grown to a size scale where it is inefficiently removed in the wind (i.e. at the first vertical dotted line at time 6× 104 yrs). This point however coincides with an acceleration of the dust flow on to the star by radial drift, so that within a further 105 years the disc is very dust depleted (see Fig. 6). This is a generic property of photoevaporation models: dust that has grown to the point that it cannot be entrained in the wind is also dust that drifts rapidly on to the star. This conclusion does not preclude the possibility of achieving high dust to gas ratios if there is some mechanism for preventing the radial inflow of dust (Pinilla et al. 2012). One such possibil- ity is associated with the pile up of grains at the water snow line in protoplanetary discs, where the lowered fragmentation velocity for ice-free grains lowers the maximum grain size and hence in- hibits radial drift within the snow line (Drażkowska et al. 2016; Schoonenberg & Ormel 2017). While we do not follow the detailed chemodynamics of ice mantle desorption at the water snow line (typically around 2 au for solar type pre-main sequence stars) we can use the results of Ormel et al. (2017) which examines the max- imum dust to gas ratio achievable at the snow line as a function of the ratio of dust to gas fluxes arriving from the outer disc. This study found that a minimum ratio of order unity is required in order to achieve suitable pre-conditions for the streaming instability. In Fig. 12 we show a suite of models with α = 10−3 8 for different FUV flux levels and see that in the absence of photoevap- oration this condition can be satisfied at early times thanks to the short growth and drift time-scales in the inner disc. After around 105 years the depletion of disc dust due to radial drift results in a decline of this flux ratio; in the absence of photoevaporation, the dust to gas flux ratio falls below 10 per cent at an age of ∼ 3 × 105 years. Fig. 12 shows that photoevaporation causes a steeper decline in the dust to gas flux ratio, an effect that can be attributed to the 8 Note that for α = 10−2 grains and gas remain sufficiently well coupled that there is no significant enhancement of the normalised flux. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 13 Figure 12. The flux of drifting dust normalised by the viscous accretion rate of the gas as a function of age. FUV flux increases from the purple (no FUV) to the red (104 G0). previous removal of dust from the outer disc which reduces the available reservoir flowing in to the inner disc. This narrows the window during which it is likely that the streaming instability can be triggered at the water snow line but the dependence on FUV field is weak (e.g. an increases of FUV background from 100 G0 to 104 G0 reduces the time at which the flux ratio drops below 0.1 by only a factor three. We thus conclude that the potential to form planets at the water snow line by this mechanism is not severely affected by even high levels of photoevaporation, provided that this process occurs within ∼ 105 years. On the other hand, photoevaporation is clearly a mild inhibitor of planet formation both because of the solid mass lost in the wind (see Fig. 8) and because of the shortening of the epoch of enhanced normalised flux at the snow-line (Fig. 12). See Haworth et al. (2018a) for a discussion of how photoevaporation would place very stringent requirements on planet formation efficiency in the Trappist 1 system where the mass in rocky planets is a significant fraction of the initial disc mass contained in solids. 8 CONCLUSIONS Our study of dust dynamics in protoplanetary discs subject to pho- toevaporation by external FUV radiation has the following principal conclusions: i) Dust loss in the wind is limited by the time required for the maximum grain size in the outer disc to grow to a size where it cannot be entrained due to strong radial drift. Typically dust stops being entrained within ∼ 105 years at which point it has grown to 10 − 100 µm. For higher α models, the dust may not grow large enough that this condition is met (Fig. 9). ii) From this point onwards, dust in the outer disc is depleted by inward radial drift (Fig. 5). This is particularly the case in discs with low turbulence levels (α = 10−3) where grains can grow to larger sizes. Higher levels of turbulence (α = 10−2) keep grains smaller and hence more tightly coupled to the gas and so dust depletion is less severe. iii) The rate of dust depletion by radial drift is strongly depen- dent on the strength of the external FUV field since this determines 103104105106Time/years0.00.10.20.30.40.5Normalisedfluxat2AUα=0.001,FUV=0G0α=0.001,FUV=100G0α=0.001,FUV=1000G0α=0.001,FUV=10000G014 A. D. Sellek et al. how much of the dust reservoir at large radius has been lost to the wind. Early loss of outer disc grains in the wind prevents the re- supply of dust to the inner disc which would otherwise partially offset the effect of radial drift. Thus although the fraction of disc dust lost to the wind never exceeds ∼ 60 per cent in our models, this can have profound effects on the dust depletion time-scale in the disc. iv) Disc demographic studies indicate that the time-scale for dust depletion (as measured by 2 µm excess emission) is not sig- nificantly shorter than the time over which accretion on to the star declines. This requirement is only met by our models for discs in which the Shakura Sunyaev α turbulence parameter is relatively high (10−2) since the smaller grain sizes in this case result in closer coupling between the dust and gas evolution (Fig. 10). Although both dust and accretion lifetimes decline with increasing ultraviolet field strengths, their relative values depend on α rather than the strength of the external FUV field. v) Conversely the predicted trajectories of models in the plane of disc radius versus flux (both measured at 850 µm) are better matched to observations at all FUV levels if α is low (∼ 10−3). In particular the models with high FUV levels pass through the region of parameter space (with relatively high flux to radius ratios) occupied by discs observed in the highly irradiated environment of the Orion Nebula Cluster. vi) The predominant factor in setting the location of the base of the photoevaporative wind is the strength of the external FUV field. Conversely, factors such as the initial disc mass and radius and viscosity have little effect. The trajectories in the plane of dust disc radius and submm flux from the dust for a given α and FUV environment become, in photoevaporating environments, likewise degenerate across a range of initial conditions (Fig. 11). vii) Since the consequence of photoevaporation is to decrease the lifetime of dust in discs, it is over all a negative factor with respect to forming rocky planets. However it has only a very mild impact on models in which rocky planets form from drifting solids at the water snow-line (Fig. 12); such models predict a peak flux of solids at an early stage of disc evolution ((cid:28) a Myr) when the impact of photoevaporation is minor. viii) Photoevaporation does not result in an enhancement of the solid to gas ratio in the outer disc (Fig. 6). Dust that has grown large enough not to be entrained in the wind is instead subject to efficient radial drift and the dust to gas ratio never significantly exceeds its initial value. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Tom Haworth, Giovanni Rosotti and Andrew Winter for useful discussions. We thank the anonymous reviewer for their feedback which helped us clarify our modelling assump- tions. RB and CJC acknowledge support from the STFC consoli- dated grant ST/S000623/1. This work has also been supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation pro- gramme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823823 (DUSTBUSTERS). REFERENCES Adams F. C., Hollenbach D., Laughlin G., Gorti U., 2004, ApJ, 611, 360 Andrews S. M., Williams J. P., 2005, ApJ, 631, 1134 Andrews S. M., Terrell M., Tripathi A., Ansdell M., Williams J. P., Wilner D. J., 2018, ApJ, 865, 157 Ansdell M., et al., 2016, ApJ, 828, 46 Ansdell M., Williams J. P., Manara C. F., Miotello A., Facchini S., van der Marel N., Testi L., van Dishoeck E. F., 2017, AJ, 153, 240 Ansdell M., et al., 2018, ApJ, 859, 21 Armitage P. J., Hansen B. M. S., 1999, Nature, 402, 633 Barenfeld S. A., Carpenter J. M., Sargent A. I., Isella A., Ricci L., 2017, ApJ, 851, 85 Beckwith S. V. W., Sargent A. I., Chini R. S., Guesten R., 1990, AJ, 99, 924 Birnstiel T., Dullemond C. P., Brauer F., 2010, A&A, 513, A79 Birnstiel T., Klahr H., Ercolano B., 2012, A&A, 539, A148 Bohlin R. C., Savage B. D., Drake J. F., 1978, ApJ, 224, 132 Booth R. A., Clarke C. J., Madhusudhan N., Ilee J. D., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 3994 Brauer F., Dullemond C. P., Henning T., 2008, A&A, 480, 859 Carrera D., Gorti U., Johansen A., Davies M. B., 2017, ApJ, 839, 16 Chiang E. I., Goldreich P., 1997, ApJ, 490, 368 Clarke C. J., 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1350 Cleeves L. I., Öberg K. I., Wilner D. J., Huang J., Loomis R. A., Andrews S. M., Czekala I., 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 110 Concha-Ramírez F., Wilhelm M. J. C., Portegies Zwart S., Haworth T. J., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1907.03760 Drake J. J., Ercolano B., Flaccomio E., Micela G., 2009, ApJ, 699, L35 Drażkowska J., Alibert Y., Moore B., 2016, A&A, 594, A105 Eisner J. A., et al., 2018, ApJ, 860, 77 Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Bisbas T. G., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3593 Fatuzzo M., Adams F. C., 2008, ApJ, 675, 1361 Fedele D., van den Ancker M. E., Henning T., Jayawardhana R., Oliveira J. M., 2010, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 510, A72 Guarcello M. G., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1605.01773 Gundlach B., Blum J., 2015, ApJ, 798, 34 Habing H. J., 1968, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Nether- lands, 19, 421 Haisch Karl E. J., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., 2001, ApJ, 553, L153 Hartmann L., Calvet N., Gullbring E., D'Alessio P., 1998, ApJ, 495, 385 Haworth T. J., Clarke C. J., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3895 Haworth T. J., Boubert D., Facchini S., Bisbas T. G., Clarke C. J., 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3616 Haworth T. J., Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Cleeves L. I., 2017, MNRAS, 468, L108 5460 Haworth T. J., Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Mohanty S., 2018a, MNRAS, 475, Haworth T. J., Clarke C. J., Rahman W., Winter A. J., Facchini S., 2018b, MNRAS, 481, 452 Henney W. J., Arthur S. J., 1998, The Astronomical Journal, 116, 322 Henney W. J., O'Dell C. R., 1999, The Astronomical Journal, 118, 2350 Henney W. J., O'Dell C. R., Meaburn J., Garrington S. T., Lopez J. A., 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 566, 315 Hildebrand R. H., 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267 Hutchison M. A., Laibe G., Maddison S. T., 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 463, 2725 Ingleby L., Calvet N., Herczeg G., Briceño C., 2012, ApJ, 752, L20 Johnstone D., Hollenbach D., Bally J., 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 499, 758 Jones E., Oliphant T., Peterson P., et al., 2001-2019, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org/ Kenyon S. J., Hartmann L., 1987, ApJ, 323, 714 Kenyon S. J., Hartmann L., 1995, ApJS, 101, 117 Lynden-Bell D., Pringle J. E., 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603 Mathis J. S., Rumpl W., Nordsieck K. H., 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 Nicholson R. B., Parker R. J., Church R. P., Davies M. B., Fearon N. M., Walton S. R. J., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4893 O'dell C. R., Wen Z., Hu X., 1993, ApJ, 410, 696 Ormel C. W., Liu B., Schoonenberg D., 2017, A&A, 604, A1 Owen J. E., Ercolano B., Clarke C. J., 2011, MNRAS, 412, 13 Paardekooper S. J., Mellema G., 2004, A&A, 425, L9 Pinilla P., Birnstiel T., Ricci L., Dullemond C. P., Uribe A. L., Testi L., Natta A., 2012, A&A, 538, A114 Rafikov R. R., 2017, ApJ, 837, 163 MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) Dust evolution in photoevaporating discs 15 au, both with initial mass MD = 0.02 M(cid:12) and subjected to an FUV flux of 1000 G0. The left panel of Fig. A1 illustrates how the behaviour of the ra- dius is qualitatively similar between the two methods, regardless of initial disc size, showing familiar shrinking, stalling and spreading phases. For initially large discs, the mass loss rates were in excellent agreement throughout the lifetime of the model. For initially com- pact discs, there was a discrepancy by over an order of magnitude in the mass loss rates at early times although at later times (cid:38) 1 Myr, the mass loss rates did converge between the methods. The more compact discs start with a wind base that lies well outside the exponential cut off radius in the initial density profile, meaning that the power law conversion between density and mass used by Haworth et al. (2018b) is not appropriate. In initially ex- tended discs, or at late times after significant viscous spreading, the steady state profile holds throughout the disc, so the different methods agree. We conclude that the method used by Winter et al. (2019a) works well for large discs but can run into difficulties if, for whatever reason, the disc surface density profile deviates from the assumed power law. While in many cases the differences are not significant, the method employed in this paper is to be preferred on account of its less restrictive assumptions. This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. Ribas Á., Bouy H., Merín B., 2015, A&A, 576, A52 Ricci L., Trotta F., Testi L., Natta A., Isella A., Wilner D. J., 2012, A&A, Rosotti G. P., Juhasz A., Booth R. A., Clarke C. J., 2016, MNRAS, 459, 540, A6 2790 Rosotti G. P., Booth R. A., Tazzari M., Clarke C., Lodato G., Testi L., 2019a, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, L63 Rosotti G. P., Tazzari M., Booth R. A., Testi L., Lodato G., Clarke C., 2019b, MNRAS, 486, 4829 Society, 325, 449 Scally A., Clarke C., 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Schoonenberg D., Ormel C. W., 2017, A&A, 602, A21 Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, 500, 33 Takeuchi T., Clarke C. J., Lin D. N. C., 2005, ApJ, 627, 286 Tanaka H., Himeno Y., Ida S., 2005, ApJ, 625, 414 Tazzari M., et al., 2016, A&A, 588, A53 Tazzari M., et al., 2017, A&A, 606, A88 Throop H. B., Bally J., 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 623, L149 Tripathi A., Andrews S. M., Birnstiel T., Wilner D. J., 2017, ApJ, 845, 44 Weidenschilling S. J., 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Whipple F. L., 1973, Radial Pressure in the Solar Nebula as Affecting the Motions of Planetesimals. p. 355 Winter A. J., Clarke C. J., Rosotti G., Ih J., Facchini S., Haworth T. J., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2700 MNRAS, p. 2191 Winter A. J., Clarke C. J., Rosotti G. P., Hacar A., Alexander R., 2019a, Winter A. J., Clarke C. J., Rosotti G. P., 2019b, MNRAS, 485, 1489 Youdin A. N., Goodman J., 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 APPENDIX A: COMPARISON OF MASS LOSS IMPLEMENTATIONS In this paper we devise a method of locating the disc outer edge and corresponding mass loss rate in terms of the location where the wind becomes optically thick to FUV radiation (see Section 2.2.2). In this way our mass loss rates are never calculated in the (unphysical) optically thin wind regime where there is the problem that the wind mass loss rate scales linearly with the surface density. In the latter case, the situation can arise where depletion of the outermost disc grid cell is accompanied by a turning off of the mass loss rate from the disc, ignoring the much greater mass loss that would result if an interior cell was deemed to be the outer edge. In order to avoid this problem, previous implementations of photoevaporation from the FRIED grid (Winter et al. 2019a) did not use the surface density in the outermost grid cell but instead a notional surface density calculated from the total disc mass and radius assuming a power law surface density profile; for the viscosity law assumed here (where ν ∝ R) this is such that Σout satisfies MD = 2πΣoutR2 The benefit of using this method is that the photoevaporation rates depend on a global quantity, and are insensitive to numerical issues at the disc edge. However, this also poses a risk of calculat- ing the wrong mass loss rate if the relationship between the local conditions at the disc edge and the total mass is different from that assumed (for example in cases where the density profile develops an exponential tail as in the viscous similarity solution of Lynden-Bell & Pringle (1974)). Here we check whether the previous implementation of (Win- ter et al. 2019a) produces significantly different results from our updated prescription for 'typical' disc evolutionary scenarios. To this end we compared the prescriptions using models of gas-only discs, one with scale radius RC = 100 au and the other with RC = 10 out. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 16 A. D. Sellek et al. (cid:219)Mmax. Right: the evolution of the photoevaporative mass loss rate. Solid lines Figure A1. Left: The evolution of disc radius measured using the position of represent discs with photoevaporation calculated using the total mass, whereas dashed lines represent those models using the local surface density at the disc edge. The red-pink colours represent models with initial scale radius RC = 100 au and blue colours RC = 10 au. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 15 (2019) 103104105106107Time/years0255075100125150175DiscRadius/AURC=100.0AU,IntegratedMassRC=100.0AU,LocalDensityRC=10.0AU,IntegratedMassRC=10.0AU,LocalDensity103104105106107Time/years10−1010−910−810−710−6PhotoevaporationRate/M(cid:12)yr−1
1901.08089	1	1901	2019-01-23T19:25:32	Giant planets and brown dwarfs on wide orbits: a code comparison project	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Gas clumps formed within massive gravitationally unstable circumstellar discs are potential seeds of gas giant planets, brown dwarfs and companion stars. Simulations show that competition between three processes -- migration, gas accretion and tidal disruption -- establishes what grows from a given seed. Here we investigate the robustness of numerical modelling of clump migration and accretion with the codes PHANTOM, GADGET, SPHINX, SEREN, GIZMO-MFM, SPHNG and FARGO. The test problem comprises a clump embedded in a massive disc at an initial separation of 120 AU. There is a general qualitative agreement between the codes, but the quantitative agreement in the planet migration rate ranges from $\sim 10$% to $\sim 50$%, depending on the numerical setup. We find that the artificial viscosity treatment and the sink particle prescription may account for much of the differences between the codes. In order to understand the wider implications of our work, we also attempt to reproduce the planet evolution tracks from our hydrodynamical simulations with prescriptions from three previous population synthesis studies. We find that the disagreement amongst the population synthesis models is far greater than that between our hydrodynamical simulations. The results of our code comparison project are therefore encouraging in that uncertainties in the given problem are probably dominated by the physics not yet included in the codes rather than by how hydrodynamics is modelled in them.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Preprint 25 January 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Giant planets and brown dwarfs on wide orbits: a code comparison project. M. Fletcher1, S. Nayakshin1, D. Stamatellos2, W. Dehnen1,3, F. Meru4,5,6, L. Mayer7, H. Deng7, K. Rice8,9 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2Jeremiah Horrocks Institute for Mathematics, Physics & Astronomy, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK 3Universitats-Sternwarte der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Scheinerstrasse 1, Munchen D-81679, Germany 4Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK 5Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 6Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 7CTAC, Institute for Computational Science, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 8SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, Royal Observatory Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK 9Centre for Exoplanet Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT Gas clumps formed within massive gravitationally unstable circumstellar discs are po- tential seeds of gas giant planets, brown dwarfs and companion stars. Simulations show that competition between three processes -- migration, gas accretion and tidal disrup- tion -- establishes what grows from a given seed. Here we investigate the robustness of numerical modelling of clump migration and accretion with the codes PHANTOM, GADGET, SPHINX, SEREN, GIZMO-MFM, SPHNG and FARGO. The test prob- lem comprises a clump embedded in a massive disc at an initial separation of 120 AU. There is a general qualitative agreement between the codes, but the quantitative agreement in the planet migration rate ranges from ∼ 10% to ∼ 50%, depending on the numerical setup. We find that the artificial viscosity treatment and the sink par- ticle prescription may account for much of the differences between the codes. In order to understand the wider implications of our work, we also attempt to reproduce the planet evolution tracks from our hydrodynamical simulations with prescriptions from three previous population synthesis studies. We find that the disagreement amongst the population synthesis models is far greater than that between our hydrodynamical simulations. The results of our code comparison project are therefore encouraging in that uncertainties in the given problem are probably dominated by the physics not yet included in the codes rather than by how hydrodynamics is modelled in them. Key words: Planet migration -- accretion discs -- hydrodynamics 1 INTRODUCTION Secondary star formation via gravitational instability (GI) of massive circumstellar discs has now been observed by ALMA (Tobin et al. 2016) and may be a viable explanation for the high frequency and the host metallicity correlations of stellar binaries with separations less than tens of AU (Moe et al. 2018). Modern star formation simulations (Bate 2018) and observations of young discs (Tychoniec et al. 2018) also indicate that massive large gas discs could be abundant. The conditions for disc fragmentation (Gammie 2001; Rafikov 2005) are similar to those for forming first hydro- static cores in star formation (Larson 1969), implying that the masses of gas clumps born in the discs must be ini- c(cid:13) 2017 The Authors tially similar to those of the opacity-limited fragments, e.g., ∼ 5−10 MJ (Low & Lynden-Bell 1976; Rees 1976; Masunaga et al. 1998), although both smaller and larger initial clump masses were considered in the literature (Boley et al. 2010; Kratter et al. 2010; Forgan & Rice 2013a). Due to these uncertainties and due to strong clump evolution after for- mation via inward migration (Mayer et al. 2004; Vorobyov & Basu 2005; Machida et al. 2011; Baruteau et al. 2011), gas accretion (Zhu et al. 2012a; Stamatellos 2015; Mercer & Stamatellos 2017) and tidal disruption (Boley et al. 2010; Nayakshin 2010), it is difficult to predict when and how often disc fragmentation leads to the formation of planets (Kuiper 1951), brown dwarfs (Stamatellos & Whitworth 2008, 2009) or secondary stellar companions (Kratter et al. 2010). 2 Fletcher et al. The scale of uncertainty in this problem is immense and affects our understanding of even the most basic questions, especially in the theory of planet formation. Direct imaging surveys show that the occurrence rate of wide separation (tens of AU or more) planetary mass companions to FGK stars, and also brown dwarfs, is just a few % (Biller et al. 2013; Chauvin et al. 2015; Reggiani et al. 2016; Vigan et al. 2017). This is much smaller than (cid:38) 50% observed planet oc- currence rate at separations less than a fraction of AU from the star (see chapter 2 in Winn & Fabrycky 2015). One interpretation of this result is that gravitational disc insta- bility rarely makes planetary-mass objects (Kratter et al. 2010; Forgan & Rice 2013a; Rice et al. 2015; Vigan et al. 2017). On the other hand, if radial migration and tidal dis- ruption transmogrify planetary mass gas clumps into short period planets, including sub-Neptune mass planets (Boley et al. 2010; Nayakshin & Fletcher 2015), then the rate at which GI fragmentation forms planetary-mass clumps could be much higher; the resulting planets are simply not where they were born. Furthermore, there is now observational support that at least some initially widely separated objects end up at sub- AU separations from the star, presumably due to disc migra- tion. The frequency of appearance of planets more massive than ∼ 4 Jupiter masses and brown dwarf companions to stars do not correlate with the host star metallicity (Ragha- van et al. 2010; Troup et al. 2016; Nayakshin 2017a; Santos et al. 2017), indicating that these objects probably did not form by Core Accretion (which predicts an opposite correla- tion, see Mordasini et al. 2012). Additionally, the properties and statistics of very strong episodic flaring of young pro- tostars, known as FU Ori outbursts (Hartmann & Kenyon 1996), are consistent with stars tidally disrupting and de- vouring (Vorobyov & Basu 2006; Takami et al. 2018) up to a dozen gas clumps per lifetime. There are many physical uncertainties in the physics of the problem, e.g., disc opacity (Meru & Bate 2010), initial conditions for disc fragmentation (Vorobyov & Basu 2010; Zhu et al. 2012a), treatment of gas cooling close to and in- side the Hill sphere of the planet (Nayakshin & Cha 2013; Stamatellos 2015; Mercer & Stamatellos 2017), dust growth and dynamics inside the clump, which may stronly affect clump cooling and heating balance (Helled & Bodenheimer 2011; Nayakshin 2016), etc. However, in addition to this, different simulation codes use different numerical algorithms to model the same pro- cesses, and it is not clear if applying these codes to the same problem will yield identical results. The goal of our paper is evaluate how the simulation results differ between some commonly used numerical codes. To focus on this issue alone, we set up a physically simple test problem of a gas giant planet embedded in a massive gas disc at an initial separation of 120 AU. The disc cooling is treated with the widely used idealised β-cooling prescription (Gammie 2001; Rice et al. 2005). To disentangle various effects, we perform four compar- ison runs. The initial planet mass is set to Mp0 = 2 MJ in three of the runs and to Mp0 = 12 MJ in the fourth. As explained above, gas accretion onto the gas clumps is an integral part of the problem. Therefore, in two of the Mp0 = 2 MJ runs we turn off gas accretion onto the planet, setting instead a relatively large gravitational soft- ening length parameter to reduce the amount of gas flowing into the gravitational potential well of the planet (as was also done by Baruteau et al. 2011). In the other two com- parison runs, a sink particle prescription is used to absorb the gas accumulating at the planet location. The paper is structured as follows. In §2 we describe the physical setup and initial conditions of the problem, and describe the contributing codes. In §3 we present main re- sults of our paper. A comparison of the results to population synthesis prescriptions is made in §4, and in §5 we discuss observational implications of this work. 2 PROBLEM AND NUMERICAL DETAIL 2.1 Contributing Codes There are five 3D SPH codes that we compare here: PHANTOM (Price et al. 2017), GADGET (Springel 2005), SPHINX (Dehnen & Aly 2012), SEREN (Hubber et al. 2011a,b), and SPHNG (Benz 1990). The Meshless Finite Mass code GIZMO (Hopkins 2015) builds on SPH methods and adds a kernel discretization of the volume, coupled to a high-order matrix gradient estimator. The GIZMO-MFM numerical scheme has a higher order consistency and ap- pears to overcome some of the numerical viscosity issues in SPH, and has been recently shown to reproduce the ex- pected convergence of the critical cooling timescale for frag- mentation (see Deng et al. 2017), which has been hard to achieve with SPH methods previously (e.g., Meru & Bate 2010). Finally, FARGO is a 2D fixed cylindrical grid finite differencing code (Masset 2000) which has been widely used for studies of planet migration and has shown consistency with analytical solutions in the linear regime applicable to much lower mass planets (e.g., Baruteau & Masset 2008) than studied here. 2.2 Problem choice The potential formation of gas giant planets via gravita- tional instability of protoplanetary discs (e.g., Kratter & Lodato 2016) motivates our study. To this end, all of our runs use a massive gas disc with initial mass Minit = 0.2M(cid:12) as an initial condition for all of our runs. The disc is in circular rotation around a star with mass M∗ = 1M(cid:12). At fragmentation, the disc Toomre (1964) Q-parameter is Q <∼ 1 (e.g., Boley et al. 2010). Such discs generate spiral density arms. Interactions of the planets with the arms give stochas- tic velocity kicks to the planets (e.g., Baruteau et al. 2011). In addition, fragmenting discs usually hatch more than one gas clump. Clump-clump interactions also lead to angular momentum exchange between the clumps (Cha & Nayakshin 2011) and even mergers (Hall et al. 2017). These processes are stochastic and make numerical simulations of planet mi- gration with different codes susceptible to small numerical detail. To avoid this stochasticity, we simplified the task at hand by choosing the parameters of the problem such that the Toomre parameter of the disc is slightly larger than expected at fragmentation, i.e., Q (cid:38) 2 everywhere, which makes the disc gravitationally stable. We then inject a planet into the disc and follow its evolution numerically. It is clearly MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) desirable to extend the code comparison in the future in the regime in which the disc is free to fragment and form more clumps. Migration code comparison 3 An ideal gas equation of state is used in this paper with the adiabatic index γ = 7/5, as appropriate for diatomic gas. The star irradiates the disc and sets the minimum irra- diation temperature, which is a function of radius R: Tirr = T0 , (1) (cid:19)−1/2 (cid:18) R R0 where T0 = 20 K and R0 = 100 au. The irradiation temper- ature corresponds to the specific internal energy, uirr = kBTirr µ(γ − 1) , (2) where µ = 2.45mp is the mean molecular weight of the gas. The radiative cooling of the disc is modelled with the β-cooling prescription widely used in the literature to model marginally stable self-gravitating discs (e.g., Rice et al. 2005). The irradiation from the central star is additionally present as a heating term, so that the specific internal energy of the gas, u, evolves according to , tcool du dt where tcool = βΩK(R)−1, = − u − uirr (cid:18) GM∗ (cid:19)1/2 ΩK(R) = R3 (3) (4) We use β = 10 for the runs presented below. This value of β is comparable to the critical fragmentation β for γ = 7/5 as found by Rice et al. (2005), although recent simulations with GIZMO-MFM suggest that disc fragmentation may occur at lower β (e.g., Deng et al. 2017) for this code. However, the inclusion of external irradiation will also likely lead to fragmentation happening for lower values of β (Rice et al., 2011) 2.3 Initial conditions We first describe the initial conditions for the SPH codes and GIZMO-MFM. The star is treated as a sink particle that accretes any SPH particles that enter inside the sink radius, Rsink = 3 au. The gravitational softening of the star is set at hg = 0.25 au. The disc is initially set up with the surface density profile Σin(R) = Md 2πR(Rout − Rin) (5) where Rin = 10 au and Rout = 300 au are the inner and the outer initial disc radii, respectively. The disc is relaxed for about 10 orbits at the outer edge before the planet is inserted. This is done to allow the disc to settle into a verti- cal hydrostatic balance and to damp out radial disc oscilla- tions. During the disc relaxation procedure, a small fraction (∼ 3%) of the SPH particles are accreted onto the central star. This is inevitable due to artificial viscosity of the disc increasing in regions of lower particle number, which is usu- ally near the inner disc boundary. These initial conditions, after the relaxation proce- dure was applied, are presented in fig. 1. The top panel shows the gas column density multiplied by radius, e.g., MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Figure 1. Initial (relaxed) conditions for all of the SPH runs presented in the paper. Top: disc surface density, plotted as Σ × (R/100 AU), and the temperature profiles. The disc inward of ∼ 30 AU is strongly affected by the sink (star) particle in- ner boundary condition. Bottom: The ratio of the disc vertical scaleheight H to 0.1R (solid) and the Toomre parameter Q. Σ(R) × (R/100 AU) and the vertically averaged gas tem- perature profile T (R). Both of these are compared to the respective column density and temperature profiles before the relaxation (blue dashed curves). We see that both the inner and the outer regions of the disc are depleted by the relaxation process, but that the region between R ∼ 30 AU and R ∼ 200 AU has a smooth Σ ∝ 1/R profile. The gas temperature profile is very close to equation 1, except for radii R (cid:46) 20 AU where the artificial viscosity heating is not negligible. Since our relaxed disc has a strong roll-over at radii smaller than R ∼ 30 AU, we expect that the planet migration process in this numerical setting will be strongly affected at radii of about 40 AU. The bottom panel of Fig. 1 presents the disc aspect ratio H/R normalised to 0.1 and the Toomre Q-parameter. As stated in the Introduction, the disc is everywhere stable to self-gravity and does not fragment. For FARGO, the initial conditions were obtained in the same physical setup but the code was relaxed for 50 orbits at the outer edge. In the simulations presented below, time is counted from the relaxed initial condition shown in Fig. 1. We in- ject the planet instantaneously at t = 0 on a prograde cir- cular orbit centred on the star at the initial separation of R = 120 AU. No change is made to the initial velocity of either the gas or the star. Note that for Mp0 = 2 MJ, the planet mass is only 1% of the disc mass and just 0.2% of the total mass of the system, so this approach is justifiable. While for the Mp0 = 12 MJ simulation the error is larger, we prefer this approach because keeping the planet orbit fixed while increasing its mass slowly (a common approach in studies of low mass planet migration) would lead to unde- 4 Fletcher et al. sirable modifications of the disc structure for our problem. For example, as found by Malik et al. (2015), the gap open- ing criterion should include a gap-opening time scale. If the planet migrates across the gap sooner than the gap could be excavated, no gap is opened. However, keeping the planet on a fixed orbit implies an infinite source of angular momentum and therefore may result in the planet opening a gap in the disc where none should be present. 2.4 Approach to code algorithm differences Numerical hydrodynamics codes, whether particle or grid based, employ different numerical algorithms to integrate equations of motions, various time-stepping criteria, and ap- proximate techniques to resolve contact discontinuities such as shocks and singularities arising in the gravitational po- tential and forces near point masses (Bodenheimer et al. 2007). For example, by default GADGET uses the Mon- aghan (1997) form of the artificial viscosity with the Balsara- Monaghan switch to reduce artificial viscosity in shear flows (Monaghan 1992; Balsara 1995), and the spline kernel for SPH (for details see Springel 2005). More modern formu- lations of artificial viscosity exist and different SPH ker- nels are adopted by some of the other codes (see §3.4). It is possible to modify GADGET to use the same approaches. However, it is not possible in practice to modify all of the codes to employ exactly the same numerical algorithms due to significantly different intrinsic code designs. Additionally, such code alterations would defeat the purpose of our code comparison project as the codes actually being compared would then be different from their current community-used versions. Therefore, we attempted no code modification in this project with only a few exceptions that relate to the most salient physics of the problem. For each test problem pre- sented below, all of the codes use the same gravitational soft- ening parameters and the accretion radii for the two sinks in the problem, as detailed further below. The sections below discuss the implementation of sink particle accretion, grav- itational softening and artificial viscosity in the codes used in this paper. 2.4.1 GADGET Our implementation of GADGET is very similar to the code description given in the instrument paper by Springel (2005), with a few changes detailed below. GADGET uses the spline kernel (Monaghan & Lattanzio 1985) for both the SPH density field and computing the gravitational soften- ing around all particles, including the sink particles. We use 40 particles for the neighbour search. The artificial viscosity of SPH is that given by the Monaghan-Balsara formulation (Gingold & Monaghan 1982; Balsara 1995), modified by the viscosity limiter prescription (see eq. 11 in Springel 2005) to alleviate unwanted angular momentum transport in the presence of shear flows. We follow the default GADGET set- tings in this paper, keeping the artificial viscosity coefficient αv set to 1 for all times, and βv = 2αv. The sink particles are implemented in a very simple way. Any SPH particle that is separated from the sink by a distance smaller than the accretion radius Ra is accreted by the sink. The linear momentum and mass of the accreted particle are added to that of the sink. Some authors con- sider more complicated gas accretion criteria. For example, Bate et al. (1995a) consider the expected pressure of the gas within the sink region and the binding energy of the gas with respect to the sink. However, there is much physical uncer- tainty in picking these additional gas accretion criteria. The sink radius defines the region of space where we have in- sufficient information (usually, no information at all) about the gas properties. The interactions of that missing gas with the SPH particle in question could change the properties of the latter in ways that cannot be computed. For example, an SPH particle on a hyperbolic trajectory around the sink is formally not bound to the sink and thus would not be accreted if one accretes only particles with negative binding energies (Bate et al. 1995a). However, the same particle may be accreted if the particle were to interact with the missing gas within the sink radius, shock due to this interaction, and then lose the excess energy through radiation. For further discussion of these issues and tests of our GADGET implementation of the sink particle prescription, see Cuadra et al. (2006) and Humphries & Nayakshin (2018). Nayakshin (2017b) found that the sink radius prescription tends to over-estimate the gas accretion rate onto a planet embedded in a massive gas disc for simulation parameters comparable to those used here (see Fig. A1 in Nayakshin 2017b). Gas accretion rates measured in this paper should be thus taken as upper limits to the corresponding astro- physical problem. 2.4.2 PHANTOM Cullen & Dehnen (2010) introduced an artificial viscosity switch which utilizes the derivative of the velocity divergence to detect shocks. Due to the switch, the artificial viscos- ity coefficient αv is varied between a minimum value, αmin, far from the shock, and the maximum, αmax = 1, reached close to the shock. We use this method for PHANTOM in this paper, as described in detail in §§2.2.7-2.2.9 in Price et al. (2017). We fix the artificial viscosity coefficient βv at 4 for our comparisons runs (see Price & Federrath 2010). An exception to this is §3.4 where we explore how results depend on the choices of the artificial viscosity prescription for PHANTOM. Gravitational softening in PHANTOM is different for interactions between sinks and interactions between sinks and SPH particles. The sink-sink softening is set to 0 by default. The sink-gas gravitational softening length is the maximum between the fixed softening length of the sink and the gas particles adaptive softening length. Gravity for SPH particles is softened by the SPH kernel function (see §2.12.2 in Price et al. 2017). Compared to GADGET, the PHANTOM default sink particle implementation also sets constraints on the binding energy and relative angular momentum of the SPH particle to be accreted. In this paper we disable these additional checks and use the same approach as specified in §2.4.1. 2.4.3 SPHINX SPHINX is an SPH code based on a conservative formula- tion (as derived from a variational principle, e.g. Price 2012) MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) with individual artificial dissipation strengths αv adapted using the Cullen & Dehnen (2010) switch with βv = 2αv. The details of the artificial viscous force differ slightly (by an amount O(h2)) from traditional implementations to ac- commodate the one-sweep SPH algorithm, which avoids separate sweeps over all particle neighbours for the den- sity and force computations. For the runs here, we use the Wendland (1995) C 2 smoothing kernel, which scales as w ∝ (h − r)3(h + 3r) for r < h with smoothing length h, adjusted to obtain Nh = 4πρh3/3m = 80 at each time step. Gravity is computed using a C∞ softening kernel with density ∝ (r2 + h2 s )−7/2, which results in a smaller force bias than traditional Plummer softening (Dehnen 2001). Individ- ual softening lengths are scaled to the smoothing lengths h such that the estimates for the gas and gravitating mass den- sities are mutually consistent (have the same bias). SPHINX uses an oct-tree for neighbour search (and gas-selfgravity which is computed using the fast multipole method Dehnen 2000) and the leap-frog (2nd order symplectic) time inte- grator. Star and planets are represented by sink particles, whose gravity is computed by direct summation. Any gas particle within one sink radius is accreted by a sink particle, whereby its mass, linear and angular momentum, as well as energy is absorbed by the sink particle (which carries a spin and internal energy for this book keeping). 2.4.4 SPHNG SPHNG is based on the version developed by (Benz 1990) and first presented by (Bate et al. 1995a). It uses variable in- dividual smoothing lengths hj and adjusts them so that the number of nearest neighbours for any particle is 50 ± 20. It also uses individual particle time-steps to simulate dense re- gions with sufficient precision while avoiding over-simulation of less dense regions, and integrates the particles using a second order Runge-Kutta scheme. The standard artificial viscosity (Monaghan 1992), with αv = 1.0 and βv = 2.0, and standard spline kernel are used. A binary tree is used to cal- culate neighbour lists and to determine gravitational forces between gas particles, with the gravitational force softened by the SPH kernel function (Price et al. 2017). The gravita- tional force between the gas particles and the sink particles is, however, done using a direct calculation, which is soft- ened by replacing the 1/r2 gravitational force dependence with 1/(r2 + h2 s ). If accretion onto the sink particles is al- lowed, then particles are only accreted if they are bound and if the specific angular momentum of the particle is less than that required for them to form a circular orbit at the accretion radius (Bate et al. 1995a). 2.4.5 GIZMO The GIZMO code is a multi-method code which inherits the tree-based gravity algorithm from GADGET3 (see Springel 2005, for GADGET2 code description) and couples it with different Lagrangian hydrodynamical solvers. For this paper we employ the Meshless Finite Mass (MFM) hydro method in GIZMO which solves the inviscid fluid equations by par- titioning the computational domain using volume elements associated with a particle distribution, and computing fluxes through the volume overlap by means of a Riemann solver MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 5 as in finite volume Godunov-type methods (Hopkins 2015). Volume elements are constructed via convolution integrals with kernel functions analogous to those adopted in SPH. Owing to the use of a Riemann solver (here we use the HLLC solver and the minmod slope limiter), GIZMO-MFM em- ploys no explicit artificial viscosity. This numerical method appears significantly less dissipative than SPH for differen- tially rotating flows, better conserving angular momentum and vorticity (Hopkins 2015; Deng et al. 2017). The kernel for the volume partitioning, the gravitational softening and the sink particle implementation are all identical to those of GADGET used in this paper (§2.4.1). 2.4.6 SEREN The SPH code seren was developed for star and planet for- mation simulations by Hubber et al. (2011b,a). The code uses an octal tree to compute gravity and find neighbours, multiple particle timesteps, and a 2nd order Runge-Kutta integration scheme. To simulate the effect of physical viscos- ity in discs, seren uses a time-dependent artificial viscosity (Morris & Monaghan 1997) with parameters αmin = 0.1, αmax = 1 and βv = 2αv, so as to reduce artificial shear viscosity away from shocks (this scheme is the predeces- sor of the Cullen & Dehnen 2010, method). Sink particles, which interact with the rest of the computational domain only through their gravity, are used to represent the central star and the planet (Bate et al. 1995b). Gas particles accrete onto a sink when they are within the sink radius and bound to the sink (see Hubber et al. 2011a). Once gas particles are accreted, their mass and linear angular momentum is added to sink. The gravitational force between gas particles and a sink is found through a direct calculation and softened ac- cording to 1/(r2 + h2 s ) to avoid unphysically large gravity forces. 2.4.7 FARGO FARGO is a 2D grid based, staggered-mesh code (Masset 2000; Baruteau & Masset 2008) that has been used exten- sively to study planet migration (Masset 2002; Masset & Casoli 2010; Baruteau et al. 2011). For the runs presented here, we use a cylindrical grid with 508 and 1536 cells in the radial and azimuthal directions, respectively. The radial grid is logarithmic with the inner and outer boundary con- ditions set at 10 and 300 AU, respectively. Von Neumann -- Richtmyer artificial bulk viscosity is used to treat contact discontinuities (Stone & Norman 1992). For this paper, FARGO also uses a fixed gravitational softening parameter hs as for all the other codes, which is a break with the common practice of scaling hs with the local disc scaleheight or the star-planet separation (e.g., Baruteau et al. 2011), but allows for a more uniform compar- ison between the codes. Specifically, the softening parameter used in grid simulations is typically set to hs = H where ∼ O(0.1) (Muller et al. 2012). In this case the gravita- tional softening would be a function of position as H ∝ R for our simulations (see fig. 1). The consequences of this for numerics are not immediately obvious, but we note that for = 0.1 and H ∼ 0.1R, the adaptive softening is equivalent to hs = 0.4 − 1.2 AU in the radial range 40-120 AU, which 6 Fletcher et al. Table 1. The parameters distinguishing the Runs presented in this paper. Ra, hs, and Mp0 are the sink accretion radius, the gravitational softening parameter, and the mass of the planet, respectively. All the other parameters and initial conditions are the same for all four Runs. 2.6 Analytical expectations Tanaka et al. (2002) derived an analytical expression for type I migration of a low mass planet in an isothermal disc. The migration timescale, defined as Run Ra (AU) hs (AU) Mp0 ( MJ) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1 2 0.01 0.01 2 2 2 12 is not too dissimilar from the 1 AU and 2 AU fixed smooth- ing employed in Runs 1 and 2 (see below). For a relatively large fixed value = 0.7 we find that the FARGO migration timescales increase by ≈ 50% compared to those presented in this paper. 2.5 The comparison runs It is possible to resolve the pre-collapse gas giant planets (clumps) in modern computer simulations directly (e.g., Bo- ley et al. 2010; Galvagni et al. 2012; Zhu et al. 2012b; Nayak- shin 2017b; Hall et al. 2017). However, while the clumps can be resolved and modelled from the point of view of hydro- dynamics, other physics, e.g., a proper equation of state in- cluding molecular hydrogen internal degrees of freedom, dust dynamics and radiative transfer, are not yet implemented in most of the codes available to us here. Any simplified radia- tive transfer scheme applied to the clumps would necessarily over-simplify their internal physics (their cooling balance is significantly different from that of the disc; e.g., see Vazan & Helled 2012) and would thus be riddled with its own un- certainties. A more prudent approach for us to follow here is to model the planet as a sink particle, just as the star, albeit with its own gas accretion (sink) radius. Table 1 shows the parameters that distinguish the four different comparison runs that are presented below. In Runs 1-3, the initial planet mass is set to Mp0 = 2 MJ, whereas Run 4 starts with Mp0 = 12 MJ. In Run 1 and 2, gas ac- cretion onto the sink is completely turned off by setting the accretion radius to zero. This is done to try to isolate the effects of planet migration versus gas accretion onto the planet. This is especially important since FARGO is a grid based code in which implementation of gas accretion is dras- tically different from the sink particle method of SPH codes. Therefore, Runs 1 and 2 can be simulated with SPH codes and FARGO, whereas Runs 3 and 4 are done with SPH only. Turning off gas accretion onto a planet does not come free of numerical cost. Gas that gets bound to the planet may eventually get very close to the planet. A very high gas density around the planet is numerically challenging as the SPH particle time step becomes too short for the code to execute effectively. Therefore, to avoid that, in Runs 1 and 2 the planet softening radius, hs is increased to 1 and 2 AU, respectively, from the much smaller value used in Run 3. For a similar reason Run 4 uses a larger accretion radius than Run 3. The initial SPH particle number is N = 106 for all of the runs presented here. τ = R R , (6) where R is the rate of change of planet-star separation due to gravitational torques from the disc, is given by (cid:18) cs (cid:19)2 1 rpΩp Ωp τiso = (2.7 + 1.1λ) −1 M(cid:63) Mp M(cid:63) Σpr2 p . (7) Here λ is the exponent of the surface density power law, Σ ∝ R−λ, Σp is the surface density at the planet location, M(cid:63) and Mp are the star and planet masses, respectively, rp is the planet-star separation, cs is the gas sound speed at the planet and Ωp is the planet Keplerian angular velocity. For the initial parameters of our disc and Mp = 2 MJ, we obtain a migration time scale of τiso = 14.6 × 103 yr. Even though our discs are not isothermal, the results of Tanaka et al. (2002) are widely used, and serve as a useful comparison for us. Baruteau et al. (2011) used the 2D code FARGO to study planet migration in very massive self-gravitating discs, for which the Toomre parameter Q self-regulates to a value between ∼ 1.5 and ∼ 3 over a broad range of radii. These au- thors also offered an analytical expression for the migration time scale: τsg ≈ (cid:19)2 2π (cid:18) 0.1 γQp (8) hp , Ωp 5.6 (3.8 − λ) h3 p q where q = Mp/M(cid:63) is the mass ratio; Qp is the Toomre parameter and hp = H/R at the planet position. For the initial parameters of our Runs 1-3, eq. 8 yields τsg = 5.0×103 yr at a separation R = 120 AU. 3 RESULTS 3.1 At a glance Fig. 2 shows the planet separation against time for Runs 1 & 2. To recap, gas accretion onto the planet is off, and instead a relatively large gravitational softening parameter is used. Despite this, some gas accumulates deep inside the Hill sphere, and differently so for different codes. This appears to be the primary reason why Runs 1 and 2 stalled for SEREN at around 5000 yr. Fig. 3 shows the results of Runs 3 & 4 (left and right panels, respectively) in which gas accretion onto the planet (sink particle) is allowed. The sink mass versus time is shown in the lower panels. A cursory look at figs. 2 & 3 shows that there is a gen- eral qualitative agreement between the different codes. For example, in Runs 1-3 the planet manages to migrate to sepa- rations of 40−60 AU for most of the codes, whereas in Run 4, in which the planet is much more massive, the planet stalls further out due to it opening a deep gap in the disc. At the same time, there are significant quantitative disagree- ments between the codes. All of the codes show that the planet develops orbital eccentricity, but the actual value of the eccentricity is different, varying between ∼ 0.01 to the maximum of ∼ 0.1. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 7 Figure 2. Planet separation versus time for Run 1 (left panel) and Run 2 (right panel). Both of these do not allow the planet to gain mass from the disc, so the sink mass is fixed at Mp0 = 2 MJ. Figure 3. Planet separation (top panel) and sink particle mass (lower panel) versus time for Runs 3 & 4 (left and right panels, respectively). MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [AU]Run 1: Acc off, Mp=2MJ, min hs=1 AUPHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENFARGOGIZMO-MFMSPHNG0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [AU]Run 2: Acc off, Mp=2MJ, min hs=2 AUPHANTOMGADGETSPHINXFARGOSERENGIZMO-MFMSPHNG0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [AU]Run 3: Racc=0.5 AU, Mp=2MJ,min hs=0.01AU0200040006000800010000Time [yr]246810121416Mass [MJ]PHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENGIZMO-MFMSPHNG0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [AU]Run 4: Racc=1 AU, Mp=12MJ, min hs=0.010200040006000800010000Time [yr]0510152025303540Mass [MJ]PHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENGIZMO-MFMSPHNG8 Fletcher et al. 3.2 Analysis of Runs 1-3 3.2.1 Migration rates We now analyse Runs 1-3 in which the planet initial mass is Mp0 = 2 MJ. To aid quantitative analysis, we determine migration time scale, τ , from the simulations. A straight- forward use of eq. 6 to calculate τ from the simulation data is ill advised due to planets having non-zero eccentricity: the instantaneously defined migration time varies significantly over a fraction of the planet orbital timescale. Some sort of time averaging of τ over times at least as long as an orbital period is thus needed. To do so, we first define a time-dependent migration rate as the final difference ∆R/∆t, where the separation and time differences are counted from the initial values: , (9) R(t) = R(t) − R0 t (cid:90) t+Tp/2 t−Tp/2 ¯R(t) = 1 Tp where R0 = R(t = 0) = 120 AU, t > 0 is time, and R(t) is the planet-star separation at that time. To remedy the oscillatory behaviour in R due to finite orbital eccentricity, we define an orbit-averaged quantity (cid:48) R(t (cid:48) , )dt (10) where Tp is the planet orbital period at location R(t). We use this definition to define the planet migration rate after t = 4, 000 yr for all of the codes, which we label τ4. We then also define the migration time scale τ7, following the procedure outlined above, but uding the data between 4,000 and 7,000 yrs. Comparison of τ4 and τ7 tells us how the migration rate varies as the planet gets closer to the star. Due to a non zero planet orbital eccentricity a finer time- resolved analysis of the migration rate does not appear well justified. Fig. 4 compares the migration time scales τ4 and τ7 (left and right panels, respectively) for all the codes for Runs 1-3, which are shown with the coloured symbols. The dashed and solid horizontal lines show the migration timescales given by eq. 7 and 8, respectively. These analytical estimates of τ are computed using the initial disc properties (see fig. 1). Taking the full range of τ4 and τ7 values, we see that they vary by a factor of 3 − 4 between the different codes for Runs 1 & 2, and by a smaller factor of ∼ 2 for Run 3. For τ4, the mean of the migration time scales are closer to the Tanaka et al. (2002) expression, but for τ7 the mean lies between the analytical estimates of Tanaka et al. (2002) and Baruteau et al. (2011). The range in the migration time scales is similar to the factor of ∼ 3 difference between these two analytical results. We also note that τ4 is longer than τ7 for most of the runs, implying that migration of the planet accelerates somewhat as the planet gets closer to the star (as long as it remains in the Type I). The same trend is predicted by the formulae shown in equations 7 and 8. We conclude from fig. 4 that there is a qualitative agreement not only between the different codes but also with the theory. Comparing Runs 1 and 2, we note that the migration timescales vary by ∼ 10% for most of the codes whereas hs changes by a factor of two. However, for SEREN the difference the two runs is larger, and is in the opposite sense compared with most of the other codes. This is likely due to a non linear interplay of how gravitational softening affects (cid:18) MH (cid:19)1/3 3M(cid:63) gravitational torques vs planet accretion. To make further progress we must consider the role of planet accretion in greater detail, as the evolving planet mass certainly affects the migration rate. 3.2.2 Hill mass versus sink mass The sink particle mass may not always properly reflect the mass of the planet. To quantify this, we define an effective Hill mass of the planet, MH, as the sink mass plus the mass of the gas within RH/2 of the planet. The choice of RH/2 is motivated by results of Nayakshin (2017b), who finds that gas bound to the planet is usually located within half the Hill radius; material between RH/2 and RH is much more likely to be lost as the planet migrates inwards. We should also note that the Hill radius definition needs to include the mass of the gas envelope around the sink itself, that is, RH = R , (11) where we use MH rather than the sink mass, Mp. When the Hill mass is dominated by the sink mass, MH can be safely replaced by Mp, and the calculation of MH from the parti- cle data is trivial. In general, however, the mass of the gas surrounding the sink is not negligible, so we iterate over RH and MH to find self-consistent values for these two quantities that obey eq. 11. Fig. 5 shows the Hill mass and the sink mass for Runs 1-3 calculated for the different codes. For Run 3, where gas accretion onto the sink is allowed, we see that for all the codes MH ≈ Mp. In other words, the gas mass within the Hill sphere is negligible compared with the sink mass. As the sink mass grows rapidly by gas accretion, this also means that once gas enters the Hill sphere it accretes onto the sink rapidly, so there is never a dynamically significant gas envelope around the sink. This is expected since we use a relatively large value of Ra = 0.5 AU for Run 3. Nayak- shin (2017b) found that the accretion rate onto the sink is roughly proportional to the sink radius (see Appendix in that paper) and that sink radii larger than ∼ 0.1 AU over-estimate the rate of gas accretion onto the sink when compared with a simulation in which the clump was directly resolved1. Fig. 5 shows that in Runs 1 & 2 the mass of gas sur- rounding the sink particle within RH/2 is comparable to the sink mass by the end of the runs, in stark contrast to Run 3. For PHANTOM in particular, at t = 10, 000 yr, the Hill mass is dominated by the envelope. In a qualitative agreement between the codes, MH is always larger in Run 3 than in Runs 1 and 2. This demon- strates that the gas envelope around the planet particle, which builds up in Runs 1 and 2 but not in Run 3, has a detrimental effect on further gas accretion onto the planet. 1 However, it is not clear what is the appropriate value of Ra to use in general as it also depends on the numerical resolution, e.g., the number of SPH particles used. Using too low a value of Ra may lead to an under-estimate of the accretion rate as the sink region may become unresolved due to a finite SPH particle resolution. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 9 Figure 4. Migration time scales for all codes for Runs 1-3 are shown with the coloured symbols, calculated for time intervals between 0 and 4,000 years (left panel) and between 4,000 and 7,000 years (right panel). The dashed and solid horizontal lines show the analytically computed migration times given by eqs. 7 and 8, respectively. The SEREN results do not appear for run 2 on the right panel since the code did not progressed to the 7000 year point. This is likely due to the extra pressure of the envelope, which makes it more difficult for the gas entering the Hill sphere to remain there. However, the exact trend going from Run 1 to Run 2 in the Hill mass is not the same for the differ- ent codes. While for GADGET and GIZMO-MFM a larger gravitational softening results in a lower mass gas envelope, this is not the case for PHANTOM and SPHINX. There- fore, gas accretion onto the planet (or the planet envelope) remains a significant source of uncertainty even in the sim- ulations where gas accretion is turned off. An exception to this could be problems where gas accretion onto the planet is physically insignificant, such as when the planet mass is very sub-Jovian or the gas cooling time is very long (as in the β (cid:29) 1 regime in Nayakshin 2017b). Let us now compare the uncertainties in the planet ac- cretion rate versus that in migration. The left panel of fig. 3 shows that there is more disagreement in the planet mass versus time plot between the different codes for Run 3 than in the planet migration tracks. The mass of gas accreted by the planet varies from a minimum of ∼ 4 MJ to a maximum of ∼ 12 MJ, whereas the planet migration timescales vary by less than a factor of 2. We believe that this smaller disagree- ment in planet migration rates may be somewhat fortuitous. As the planet mass increases, the analytic formulae in the linear type I regime (e.g., eq. 7) predict that the migration rate should increase linearly with planet mass. However, as the planet starts to open a gap, it starts to transition into a slower type II regime. The migration rate therefore de- pends on the planet mass somewhat less strongly than can be expected based on the theoretical type I predictions. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 3.3 Run 3 and Run 4 3.3.1 Gap opening Runs 3 and 4 both use the sink particle prescription but differ in the initial sink mass, 2 MJ and 12 MJ, respectively. These two simulations cover the parameter space in which a growing planet goes from migrating in type I (no gap in the disc) to type II (a deep gap opened). In the outer massive disc, both planet migration rates and gas accretion rates onto the planet are far larger in the Type I regime than in the Type II regime (e.g., Zhu et al. 2012b; Nayakshin 2017b). The time and radial location where the switch between mi- gration regimes occurs is thus of a significant importance. Fig. 6 shows with different coloured lines the planet mass versus separation tracks for Runs 3 (left panel) and 4 (right panel) for all the eligible codes. The planets start at the lower right corner and move towards the upper left corner in this diagram. There are also four black curves in the figure that show theoretical predictions from Crida et al. (2006) for when a deep gap in the disc should be opened. According to these predictions, the planet opens a gap when the parameter Cp is smaller than unity: 50αH 2 (12) Cp = 3 4 H RH + ≤ 1 . M∗ Mp R2 Here α is the physical viscosity parameter of the gas disc (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973). We do not set a physical vis- cosity parameter in the runs presented here (PHANTOM offers a facility for this but most other SPH codes do not). However, artificial viscosity in numerical schemes can mimic certain effects of a physical viscosity. Price et al. (2017) show that for the PHANTOM viscosity implementation, artificial viscosity parameter αv, set to unity for all SPH codes here (but see §3.4), results in effective Shakura & Sunyaev (1973) Run 1Run 2Run 3Run0500010000150002000025000Migration timescale, τ, [yr]Migration timescales at t=4000 yrRun 1Run 2Run 3Run0500010000150002000025000Migration timescales at t=7000 yrBaruteauTanakaPHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENFARGOSPHNGGIZMO-MFM10 Fletcher et al. Figure 5. The Hill mass, MH (red curves), and the sink mass Mp (black), for Runs 1-3. viscosity parameter α = 1 10 αv hsml H , (13) where hsml is the SPH smoothing lengh and H is the local disc vertical height scale (see Murray 1996). At the separa- tion where our planets open gaps, we have hsml/H ≈ 0.4, and hence the effective disc viscosity of these codes is about α = 0.03. Additionally, self-gravitating protoplanetary discs gen- erate physical viscosity that saturates at a maximum value of α ∼ 0.06 (Gammie 2001; Rice et al. 2005) for marginally stable discs. The value of the Q-parameter for our disc is significantly greater than the critical ∼ 1.5 and we thus ex- pect that the effective α from the disc self-gravity is much smaller than the maximum value. Fig. 6 show the planet gap-opening mass as a function of separation for our initial discs, defined as the planet mass for which Cp = 1. The solid curve sets α = 0.03, whereas for the dashed and the dotted curves α = 0.05 and α = 0.1, respec- tively. Since planet migration effectively stalls (at least on the time scales of our simulations) when the planet switches to the type II migration regime, the radial location of this switch can be identified in the figure as the point where the planet track turns from being mainly horizontal to being more vertical. For Run 3, the left panel of fig. 6 shows that MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214Mass [MJ]PHANTOM0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214SPHINX0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214GADGET0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214Mass [MJ]GIZMO-MFM0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214FARGO0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214SEREN0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214Mass [MJ]SPHNGHill Mass Run 1Hill Mass Run 2Hill Mass Run 3MP Run 1-2MP Run 3the location at which the migration type switches is approx- imately consistent with the Crida et al. (2006) prediction for α = 0.1, although the actual value of the separation and planet mass at that point are somewhat different for the codes. However, the estimated effective disc viscosity for the codes is α = 0.03, and the respective (solid) curve in fig. 6 yields significantly smaller masses. The only exception to that is GIZMO-MFM whose meshless finite mass scheme was shown to provide smaller artificial viscosity (Deng et al. 2017). The results of Run 4 are largely consistent with this picture. We see that the gap opening value of planet mass and separation lie close to the α = 0.1 theoretical curve, with GIZMO-MFM transiting into type II migration somewhat earlier once again. One exception to this is PHANTOM, for which the planet seems to cross the migration type dividing line rather uneventfully. The fact that our simulated gas clumps open gaps at higher masses and later in time than predicted by the Crida et al. (2006) analysis confirms the findings of Malik et al. (2015) who showed that in massive circumstellar discs, gap opening is more difficult than for less massive discs. As shown by Malik et al. (2015), if planets migrates through the horse-shoe region faster than the gap can be excavated by planet toques, the gap remains closed even if Cp falls below unity. Finally, although our code migration comparison project is not designed to study the longer term planet evo- lution that occurs in the Type II regime, we can see from fig. 6 that there is a significant disagreement in the planet evolution once it crosses over into the Type II regime. While qualitatively we see that planets tend to stall in Type II, as expected, some codes predict that the planets continue to migrate in while others (PHANTOM in the left hand panel) start to migrate outward. This may indicate that the secu- lar evolution of the planets in the Type II migration regime is even more model dependent than the Type II which we mainly aim to study here. 3.3.2 Gas accretion time scales As emphasized by previous authors, there is a competition between the process of gas accretion onto the planet and its inward migration (e.g., Zhu et al. 2012b; Nayakshin 2017b). This competition plays a significant role in shaping of the outcome of disc fragmentation. It is hence convenient to de- fine, in addition to the migration time scale, an accretion time scale for the planet, tacc, tacc = Mp M , (14) where M is the gas accretion rate onto the planet. The cor- responding dimensionless quantity τacc, τacc = tacc Tp , (15) where Tp = 2π/Ωp is the orbital period at the planet loca- tion, will be useful as well. Bate et al. (2003) studied planet migration and accre- tion in isothermal discs and found that the following equa- tion describes the gas accretion rate onto the planet well in MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 11 the Type I migration regime, Mp M∗ ΩpρR3 , Macc = b (16) where b ≈ 2.3 empirically and ρ is the disc midplane density. By writing ρ = Σ/(2H) and expressing Σ = csΩp πGQ , (17) where Q is the Toomre parameter at the planet location, we can re-arrange the Bate et al. (2003) result as τacc = b −1Q . (18) Zhu et al. (2012a) used a 2D code to study clump mi- gration and accretion, and provided a 2D estimate for the rate of gas accretion onto the planet, M = 4ΣΩR2 H (19) Expressing Σ through eq. 17 again, we obtain the corre- sponding gas accretion time scale τacc = Mp M Tp = 3 8 RH H Q . (20) Since for our planets RH ∼ H within a factor of two or so, eq. 20 is actually not very different from eq. 18. Fig. 7 shows dimensionless accretion time scales for Runs 3 and 4. The black curves show the analytic estimates obtained with eqs. 18 and 20, respectively. For eq. 18, we show three curves which use b = 2.3 (as in Bate et al. 2003), and then also b = 1, and 1/3. We can see that both ana- lytic prescriptions predict much faster accretion rates onto the planet than actually measured in the simulations. This is most likely due to the analytic estimates assuming an isothermal equation of state and therefore the maximum ef- ficiency for gas capture onto the planet. In the runs pre- sented here, the gas is not isothermal and heats up due to adiabatic compression in the Hill sphere. The cooling rate β-parameter is β = 10, which is relatively large. Nayakshin (2017b), see also Humphries & Nayakshin (2018), found that gas accretion onto planets is significantly suppressed for β (cid:38) a few. The isothermal gas accretion rate estimates from Bate et al. (2003) and Zhu et al. (2012b) physically corresponds to the β (cid:28) 1 regime investigated in Nayakshin (2017b), for which much higher accretion rates were indeed obtained. It appears that b ≈ 1/3 in eq. 18 fits the gas accretion rates in the Type I migration regime best. Fig. 7 also demonstrates that the accretion time in- creases strongly when the planet switches to the type II migration regime. This has also been seen in previous simu- lations (e.g., Bate et al. 2003) and is to be expected as the planet clears its immediate neighbourhood of gas, chocking its own growth. The initial dips in the accretion time for both panels in fig. 7 are caused by our artificial initial conditions, in which a massive planet is injected in the disc. The gas within the Hill sphere of the planet then finds itself strongly bound to it and accretes onto the planet on a time scale shorter than the local dynamical time, 1/Ω. This initial transient is followed by a more self-consistent evolution in which the gas in the Hill sphere of the planet "knows about its existence". 12 Fletcher et al. Figure 6. Planet mass vs separation for Runs 3 and 4 (coloured curves). The black curves running from the bottom left to the top right corners of the panels show the gap opening planet mass (eq. 12) for several different values of the viscosity parameter α as specified in the legend. The planet mass-separation tracks turn more vertical when they switch into the Type II regime. As discussed in §3.3.1, the expected gap opening masses are given by the solid curve, but the actual ones are closer to the α = 0.1 curve. Figure 7. Left panel: Dimensionless accretion time scale against time for Run 3. The black curves are analytical estimates for the accretion time scale given by eqs. 18 (for different values of the parameter b) and 20, as indicated in the legend. These estimates assume an isothermal equation of state and therefore over-predict the gas accretion rates measured in the simulations. Right panel: Same but for Run 4. Note that the gas accretion time increases strongly when a gap in the disc is opened. 3.4 Importance of artificial viscosity prescription Artificial viscosity is used in SPH and grid based codes to treat flow discontinuities such as shocks (Monaghan 1992; Bodenheimer et al. 2007). The codes we test here differ in their implementation of the artificial viscosity. Some part of the differences in the results of Runs 1-4 (discussed in §3) may be due to these numerical technique differences. Varying the viscosity prescriptions for all of the codes would make the presentation of this paper overly long. Instead we pick one code, PHANTOM, and investigate how different artificial viscosity choices affect the results for just Run 3. All modern SPH codes employ artificial viscosity pre- scriptions that include a term linear in ∆v, the velocity dif- ference between two interacting SPH particles, and a term quadratic in ∆v (Springel 2005; Price et al. 2017). That is, the first term enters artificial viscosity with a dimensionless MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 406080100120Separation [AU]100101Mass [MJ]Run 3 Mass vs SeparationPHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENSPHNGGIZMO-MFMα=0.03α=0.05α=0.140.060.080.0100.0120.0Separation [AU]101Run 4 Mass vs Separation0200040006000800010000Time [yr]100101102Accretion timescale, τacc/TpRun 3 accretion timescales vs timePHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENSPHNGGIZMO-MFMBate+ 03 b=2.3Bate+ 03 b=1Bate+ 03 b=1/3Zhu+ 120200040006000800010000Time [yr]101102Run 4 accretion timescales vs timePHANTOMGADGETSPHINXSERENSPHNGGIZMO-MFMBate+ 03 b=2.3Bate+ 03 b=1Bate+ 03 b=1/3Zhu+ 12Migration code comparison 13 First, without reference to the different artificial viscos- ity values in the figure, we note that the larger the planet mass, the more rapidly the planet migrates, at least until it opens a gap and switches to type II migration. Such a trend simply reflects the fact that more massive planets migrate more rapidly in the Type I regime (eq. 7). Another trend obvious through all of the curves is that the higher artificial viscosity simulations tend to yield smaller gas accretion rates onto the planet. The least viscous run (red solid curve) shows the the largest gas accretion rate onto the sink and the most rapid migration. The most vis- cous run (green dashed curve) shows the slowest migration and the smallest gas accretion rate. The rest of the runs show a continuous transition between these two extremes. This gas accretion trend with artificial viscosity is most likely due to the artificial viscosity heating of the gas inside the Hill radius. The larger the gas viscosity, the larger the dissipation rate within the Hill sphere, making the gas hot- ter. Such sensitivity of gas accretion rate onto the planet to heating within the Hill sphere was seen in the previous litera- ture although for different reasons. Nayakshin & Cha (2013) and Stamatellos (2015) included planet radiative feedback on the surrounding gas, and found that when the feedback is present, it keeps the gas hotter in the planet's Hill sphere, stifling gas accretion onto it. Nayakshin (2017b) found that slower radiative cooling rates within the Hill sphere, which also makes the gas hotter in that region, likewise leads to a reduction in the gas accretion rate. In greater detail, we see that the runs with βv = 0.2 and βv = 2 are virtually indistinguishable, implying that the quadratic term in the artificial viscosity prescription is negligible for these small values of βv for the given problem. Higher values of βv however definitely affect the results. We also see that the fixed αv simulations lead to less massive and less rapidly migrating planets that tend to open a gap sooner. The range of migration rates and planet masses in fig. 8 is large enough to conclude that although the artificial viscosity is not the only reason for differences in the results from the four runs explored in this paper, it is one of the ma- jor reasons for these differences. For example, GADGET's planet separation versus time track for Run 3 is similar to the green dashed curve in fig. 8 for PHANTOM obtained with a fixed αv = 1, as used by GADGET. However, by de- fault GADGET uses βv = 2αv, which is much smaller than βv = 10 for the green dashed curve. Clearly, other code dif- ferences, both in viscosity implementation (GADGET uses the Balsara 1995, switch; PHANTOM does not), and in how artificial softening and gas accretion onto the sink is imple- mented must be at play. A recent study by Stamatellos & Inutsuka (2018) found that the artificial viscosity coefficient αv can also drive differences in planet accretion/migration. On the other hand, while PHANTOM simulations sug- gest a higher artificial viscosity might suppress accretion via spurious heating of the gas surrounding a sink particle, the trend shown by the GIZMO-MFM results in this paper sug- gest the role of numerical viscosity might be more complex. Indeed, as shown in Deng et al. (2017), the MFM method, which does not employ any artificial viscosity, at variance with all SPH methods, minimizes spurious transport of an- gular momentum inside self-gravitating disks and results in a lower accretion onto sink particles (see Appendix B in Figure 8. Differences in the results of Run 3 for PHANTOM when the values of the artificial viscosity parameters αv and βv are varied. See §3.4 for detail. coefficient αv, and the second with coefficient βv. In some codes, e.g., GADGET, these coefficients are fixed whereas in others such as PHANTOM they are allowed to vary in time during simulations. Cullen & Dehnen (2010) in partic- ular presented a method in which αv depends on the time derivative of the particle velocity divergence. The latter is used as a shock indicator and helps to eliminate artificial viscosity away from shocks, reducing unwanted numerical dissipation in dynamically quiet regions. Additionally, there are different suggestions on the appropriate values for the coefficient βv to use, and in fact this may depend on the problem studied (Price et al. 2017). Fig. 8 shows how the planet separation (top panel) and planet mass (bottom panel) are affected by the changes in the viscosity prescription for Run 3. The solid curves show Run 3 in which the αv parameter is time-dependent as in the method of Cullen & Dehnen (2010), and is allowed to vary between 0 ≤ αv ≤ 1. The different colours in the solid curves indicate different values of the coefficient βv, which we varied in a broad range, from βv = 0.2 to βv = 10. The dashed curves in fig. 8 show simulations with the same range in βv but which now use a fixed value for αv = 1. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [AU]Run 3: PHANTOM viscosity test0200040006000800010000Time [yr]02468101214Mass [MJ]0<αv<1,βv=O.20<αv<1,βv=20<αv<1,βv=40<αv<1,βv=10αv=1,βv=0.2αv=1,βv=2αv=1,βv=4αv=1,βv=1014 Fletcher et al. Deng et al. 2017). Indeed MFM solves the fluid equations via Riemann solver as in Godunov-type finite volume meth- ods, which removes the need of an artificial viscosity term in the hydro equations (Hopkins 2015). Artificial viscosity implementations in SPH can induce enhanced angular momentum transport, and thus accretion, in non-shocking rotating flows inside fluid disks, owing to the contribution of the linear in ∆v term (even with cor- rection terms such as the Balsara switch, e.g., Kaufmann et al. 2007). Spurious heating and artificial angular momen- tum transport are thus two different unwanted effects of artificial viscosity which affect accretion in opposite ways. Quantifying the interplay of these two effects warrants fur- ther investigation. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that, in the GIZMO-MFM runs, the reduced accretion limits asymptoti- cally the mass growth of the protoplanet to less than 10MJ , namely within the gas giant planet regime. 4 COMPARISON TO POPULATION SYNTHESIS At the time of writing, there are three detailed popula- tion synthesis models that address the evolution of clumps formed by gravitational instability at distances of tens to 100 AU. Such population synthesis is a necessary step to correctly interpret the results of large observational surveys (e.g., Vigan et al. 2017) with respect to how often disc frag- mentation might result in the formation of massive planets and/or brown dwarfs. The population synthesis models differ in assumptions about the initial state of the disc and the clumps, disc dis- sipation, clump radiative cooling, dust dynamics and core formation, clump migration and accretion. It is of course not possible for us to examine these different approaches here. However, we can investigate a more limited but better defined question: how well would these models reproduce the evolution of the clumps that we see in our numerical models given the same disc and clump properties as our simulations? To facilitate the population synthesis comparison to the simulations presented in this paper, we shall utilize the fact that the disc surface density profiles evolve relatively weakly in Run 3 as the planet remains in the Type I migration regime for most of the codes until it stalls not very far from the disc inner edge. We can therefore use the initial disc surface density profile for this comparison. For Run 4, there is a stronger surface density evolution, but we shall use the same approach (since two of the three population synthesis codes make such an approximation too), hoping that it will capture the essentials of the problem. We first overview the clump migration approaches. For- gan & Rice (2013b) use the simplified migration scheme from Nayakshin (2010), in which the Type I migration timescale is tI = Ω . (21) (cid:18) Mp M∗ (cid:19)−1 H R This is derived from the Tanaka et al. (2002) formula (eq. 7) by requiring additionally a marginally unstable self- gravitating disc for which the Toomre parameter Q ≈ 1 everywhere. For type II, the migration time scale is given (cid:18) H (cid:19)−2 by the disc viscous time, tII = tvisc = 1 αΩ R . (22) The switch between Type I and Type II migration occurs when Mp > Mt, where Mt is the transition mass given by, (cid:18) H (cid:19)3 R Mt = 2M∗ (23) as used by Bate et al. (2003). We note that Forgan et al. (2018) have recently presented an updated population syn- thesis model. We do not include this study in our code com- parison here because its migration module is similar to the Muller et al. (2018) treatment, which is discussed below. Furthermore, Forgan et al. (2018) also consider multiple gas clumps and model their N-body interactions. These effects can be very important in modifying the outcome of disc frag- mentation (Hall et al. 2017) but is beyond the scope of our one-clump study. Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) use the Tanaka et al. (2002) expression for type I migration written as tI = fmig M 2∗ MpMd −1 H 2 R2 Ω (24) where Md = 2πΣ(R)R2 is a measure of the local disc mass, and fmig is a dimensionless factor, set between 0.5 and 2 for different models. The factor is introduced to mimic the stochastic kicks from spiral density waves or other clumps. The Type II migration time is also set to the viscous time but with a correction multiplicative factor, tII = tvisc 1 + . (25) (cid:18) (cid:19) Mp Md The factor (1 + Mp/Md) takes into account planet inertia when the disc is less massive than the planet (Syer & Clarke 1995). The correction is not very important for outer massive discs but may become large in the inner disc (R (cid:46) 10 AU). The Crida parameter (Cp, eq. 12) is used to model the tran- sition between Type I and Type II migration. To prevent a sharp transition when Cp = 1, an exponential function of the form, f = min(1, exp[−(Cp − 1)]) is used to smooth the transition out. Note that Cp is a function of the viscosity pa- rameter α, which is poorly known for protoplanetary discs. Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) assumed that log α is a ran- dom uniform variable in the limits between log(0.005) and log(0.05). We shall evaluate the results for these minimum and maximum values of α. Finally, Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) use a time-dependent 1D viscous disc model to evolve the disc surface density and other disc properties, and to conserve the angular momentum in the interactions between the disc and the planet, but for comparison below we shall assume the initial disc properties to be consistent with the two other models. Muller et al. (2018) use a third set of equations to con- trol planet migration, based on Baruteau et al. (2011), see eq. 8. For type II migration, eq. 25 is used but without the (1 + Mp/Md) correction, which however is unimportant for this paper as it is close to unity. Muller et al. (2018) also use the Crida parameter to determine when the planet switches to the type II migration, but consider two additional re- quirements for gap opening based on the work of Malik et al. (2015). They define three timescales, τvisc = R2/ν, MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) τcross = 2.5RHv−1 r , where vr is the radial velocity of the planet, and τgap = q2(H/R)5Ω−1. The additional require- ments demand that ητgap < τcross and τvisc < τcross, where η is a dimensionless factor varied from 10 to 1000, with η = 100 used as a baseline model. Here we test only the first of these two additional criteria since it was the one used for most of the models in Muller et al. (2018). Finally, population synthesis models also differ in how they treat the gas accretion onto clumps. Two of the pop- ulation synthesis models (Forgan & Rice 2013b; Nayakshin & Fletcher 2015) neglected gas accretion onto the clumps, assuming a fixed gas mass unless the clumps are tidally dis- rupted. Muller et al. (2018) prescribed a gas accretion rate onto the clumps based on earlier simulations of Galvagni & Mayer (2014). Since our gas clumps accrete a significant amount of gas as they migrate, for a proper comparison with the population synthesis prescriptions we need all of them to take accretion into account. We previously found that the Bate et al. (2003) expressions for gas accretion rates, when reduced down to account for a smaller accretion efficiency of our slowly cooling discs, yields a reasonable match to the ccretion time scales of our simulation (fig. 7). We there- fore use eq. 16 with b = 1/3 here to let the planets gain mass when investigating Forgan & Rice (2013b); Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) models. We also need to take into account the decrease in the accretion rate when the planet switches from type I to the type II regime, which is clearly seen in fig. 7. To this end we write (cid:104) −(Cp−1)/∆C(cid:105)−1 Mp = Macc 1 + e , (26) Macc is the accretion rate estimate given by eq. 16 where where ∆C = 0.2. We shall see below that this yields a de- cent fit to the planet mass evolution for both Run 3 and Run 4. With this approach, the comparison of population synthe- sis models to hydrodynamical simulations isolates just the planet migration and gap opening aspects. Figs. 9 and 10 show such comparisons for Run 3 and Run 4, respectively. The shaded region represents approxi- mately the range of numerical results obtained for these runs with the different numerical codes. In particular, PHATOM and GIZMO-MFM are selected to show the fastest and the slowest migrating planets for Run 3 in the left panel; the SEREN and GIZMO-MFM curves to show the range of mod- els in the middle and right panels. For Run 4, PHANTOM and SEREN are selected as the extremes for the both planet accretion and migration tracks. We see that there is a significant difference in how the three population synthesis models compare to the numeri- cal results. The Muller et al. (2018) study appears to over- estimate somewhat how quickly and how far the planets migrate before they switch into the Type II regime. This seems to be because Muller et al. (2018) formulae are based on Baruteau et al. (2011) and yield too rapid migration by a factor of a few in the type I regime, as was seen in fig. 4. Also, the planet opens a gap a little closer to the star than it does in the simulations. This depends on the parameter η which is set to 100 and 1000 for the solid and the dashed curves, respectively. The Forgan & Rice (2013b) approach appears to yield too slow a migration rate. This is because the planet switches MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 15 into the Type II migration rate immediately, as the transi- tion mass in this approach is set to 2(H/R)3M∗ ≈ 2 MJ, and the planet is already this massive in the beginning of the Run 3. This under-estimates the planet transition mass, which is found to be in the range of ∼ 7 MJ to ∼ 30 MJ (cf. fig. 6). We found that a much better fit to Run 3 is obtained with the Forgan & Rice (2013b) formulae if the transition mass is increased by a factor of ∼ 5. The Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) formulae used Tanaka et al. (2002) expression for the migration rate with a dimen- sionless factor fmigr in front. The factor was a logarithmi- cally uniform random variable in the limits 0.5 < fmigr < 2 and was meant to mimic possible stochastic kicks that the clumps obtain when interacting with the spiral density waves of the disc (see Baruteau et al. 2011). In the interest of fig- ure clarity we use fmigr = 1 in fig. 9 for this model. Further, Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) use the Crida et al. (2006) switch for gap opening, with the α parameter being a sum of two parts, a constant α and a part driven by self-gravity. We neglect the latter contribution to α here, and show two cases with α = 0.005 and 0.05 in fig. 9. It is apparent that the smaller α curve (red solid) opens a gap in the disc far more easily than expected. The α = 0.05 curve (red dashed) seems more reasonable. However, we must remember that Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) neglected gas accretion onto the planet. The agreement of their prescriptions with Run 3 would have been worse if we kept the planet mass fixed at 2 MJ. Fig. 10 shows that for a more massive gas clump none of the population synthesis prescriptions fare particularly well. The Forgan & Rice (2013b) model and the low vis- cosity model of Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) open a gap in the disc too early, as for Run 3. The higher viscosity model of Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) does relatively well in terms of gap opening mass but over-estimates the speed with which the planet migrates in initially. The Muller et al. (2018) equations also yield clumps migrating in too rapidly, and the gap is opened too close in compared with numerical simulations. We therefore conclude that matching numerical results with analytic expressions remain a problem. What is par- ticularly alarming is that seemingly benign changes in the parameters of the population synthesis prescriptions (such as a factor of a few change in the planet transition mass) can yield planet migration rates different by ∼ two orders of magnitude as the planet switches into the Type II migration regime prematurely. 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Numerics In this paper we set up four different simulations of a gas planet starting at an initial separation of 120 AU in a mas- sive gaseous disc. These 4 Runs differed in treatment of gas accretion onto the planet and the initial planet mass. We then performed these simulations with seven different nu- merical codes in order to compare their results. We find differences by a factor of ∼ 2, and sometimes as large as 3, between different codes in the accretion and migration rates. A more detailed analysis using PHANTOM 16 Fletcher et al. Figure 9. Comparison of migration and accretion tracks for Run 3, shown as a shaded region, with population synthesis models as shown in the legend. Left panel: planet separation vs time; Middle panel: planet mass vs time; Right panel: mass vs separation. Figure 10. Same as fig. 9 but for Run 4. See §4 for more detail. indicates that these differences are to a large degree due to variations in the artificial viscosity prescriptions between the codes, although other factors such as gravitational softening and sink particle treatment probably also contribute. We also compared our results with the planet migration and accretion prescriptions from three previous population synthesis studies (§4 and figs. 9 & 10). The Forgan & Rice (2013b) approach is found to open deep gaps in the disc pre- maturely. Since planets migrate very slowly in the type II regime, this implies that this study may over-estimate the population of gas giants remaining at wide separation after gas discs are dispersed. The Muller et al. (2018) study, on the other hand, over-estimates the rate of inward migration of planetary mass clumps. The Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) study fits the Run 3 results relatively well in the high vis- cosity case but not for the low viscosity case. In the latter case, clumps open deep gaps in the disc and tend to stall on wide orbits when they should migrate to smaller radii via Type I migration. However, all three population synthesis prescriptions fare poorly for Run 4 in which a more massive planet is considered. Additionally, Forgan & Rice (2013b) and Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) neglect gas accretion onto clumps. 5.2 Observational implications Recent observational surveys of solar type stars show that only a few % of such stars are orbited by massive planets or brown dwarfs on orbits larger than ∼ 10 AU (e.g., Biller et al. 2013; Chauvin et al. 2015; Vigan et al. 2012, 2017). Let us call this fraction Npresent. This is a key constraint on the theory of planet and brown dwarf formation via gravi- tational instabilities of large massive gas discs. However, it is even more important to consider the frequency of such objects in a time-integrated sense, that is, the number of gas clumps formed by disc fragmentation per star. Let this fraction be Nbirth. The two fractions are clearly connected via Npresent = Nbirth × Psurv , (27) where Psurv < 1 is the probability for a gas clump to survive to the present day at a wide separation. Detailed calculations and population synthesis ap- proaches are necessary to calculate Psurv accurately. Forgan & Rice (2013b) obtained Psurv ∼ 1, Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) had Psurv <∼ 0.1 (Nayakshin 2016, found a yet smaller value, Psurv ∼ 0.05, when feedback effects of the luminous core onto the clump are included), and Muller et al. (2018) found Psurv (cid:28) 1 but noted that this depends strongly on model assumptions. Rice et al. (2015) in addition showed MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) 0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [Au]0200040006000800010000Time [yr]051015202530Mass [MJ]Run 3: Mp=2MJb=1/3Nayakshin α=0.05Nayakshin α=0.005Forgan+RiceMuller+ η=100Muller+ η=1000This Paper020406080100120Separation [Au]100101Mass [MJ]0200040006000800010000Time [yr]020406080100120Separation [Au]0200040006000800010000Time [yr]101520253035404550Mass [MJ]Run 4: Mp=12MJb=1/3Nayakshin α=0.05Nayakshin α=0.005Forgan+RiceMuller+ η=100Muller+ η=1000This Paper406080100120Separation [Au]10152025303540Mass [MJ]that N-body interactions with secondary stars may remove a number of wide separation planets, lowering the fraction of Psurv further in the post-disc dispersal phase. Our simulations and population synthesis comparison (figs. 9 and 10) demonstrate that just varying the assump- tions about the underlying physics of the disc or clumps by a factor of a few may influence the results very strongly. One has to also add to this that the exact birth mass of the fragments and the mass of the disc at which it fragments are not known to better than a factor of a few (e.g., Kratter & Lodato 2016), and the evolution of the clump strongly depends on uncertain disc cooling and dust physics (Nayak- shin 2017b), radiative feedback from the clump (Nayakshin & Cha 2013; Stamatellos 2015; Mercer & Stamatellos 2017), etc. Therefore, the uncertainty in Psurv at present is uncom- fortably large. At this time we cannot rule out a survival probability that would imply Nbirth > 1. What is the best way forward in resolving these uncer- tainties? Clearly, theoretical and simulation efforts to con- strain Psurv from first principles should continue. However, other indirect approaches can also help. If the migration processes allow GI planets to populate the whole range of separations between the stellar radius and their birth place, what would be the differences between the objects left be- hind from this migration and those made by Core Accretion? If we are able to understand these differences more robustly, then discovering (or not) such unusual objects at separations less than 10 AU may yield independent constraints on Psurv and Nbirth. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Theoretical astrophysics research at the University of Le- icester is supported by a STFC grant. The work performed at the University of Leicester used the ALICE High Per- formance Computing Facility, and the DiRAC Data In- tensive service at Leicester, operated by the University of Leicester IT Services, which forms part of the STFC DiRAC HPC Facility (www.dirac.ac.uk). The equipment was funded by BEIS capital funding via STFC capital grants ST/K000373/1 and ST/R002363/1 and STFC DiRAC Op- erations grant ST/R001014/1. DiRAC is part of the Na- tional e-Infrastructure. FM acknowledges support from The Leverhulme Trust, the Isaac Newton Trust and the Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship. This work was undertaken on the COSMOS Shared Memory system at DAMTP, University of Cambridge operated on behalf of the STFC DiRAC HPC Facility. This equipment is funded by BIS Na- tional E-infrastructure capital grant ST/J005673/1 and STFC grants ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1. This work also used the DiRAC Data Centric system at Durham University, operated by the Institute for Computational Cosmology on behalf of the STFC DiRAC HPC Facil- ity (www.dirac.ac.uk). This equipment was funded by a BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant ST/K00042X/1, STFC capital grant ST/K00087X/1, DiRAC Operations grant ST/K003267/1 and Durham University. DiRAC is part of the National E-Infrastructure. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017) Migration code comparison 17 REFERENCES Balsara D. S., 1995, Journal of Computational Physics, 121, 357 Baruteau C., Masset F., 2008, ApJ, 678, 483 Baruteau C., Meru F., Paardekooper S.-J., 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1971 Bate M. R., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5618 Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Price N. M., 1995a, MNRAS, 277, 362 Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Price N. M., 1995b, MNRAS, 277, 362 Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Bromm V., 2003, MNRAS, 339, 577 Benz W., 1990, in Buchler J. R., ed., Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations Problems and Prospects. pp 269 -- + Biller B. A., et al., 2013, ApJ, 777, 160 Bodenheimer P., Laughlin G. P., R´ozyczka M., Yorke H. W., P. Bodenheimer, G. P. Laughlin, M. R´ozyczka, & H. W. Yorke eds, 2007, Numerical Methods in Astrophysics: An Introduc- tion Boley A. C., Hayfield T., Mayer L., Durisen R. H., 2010, Icarus, pp 509 -- 516 Cha S.-H., Nayakshin S., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3319 Chauvin G., et al., 2015, A&A, 573, A127 Crida A., Morbidelli A., Masset F., 2006, Icarus, 181, 587 Cuadra J., Nayakshin S., Springel V., Di Matteo T., 2006, MN- RAS, 366, 358 Cullen L., Dehnen W., 2010, MNRAS, 408, 669 Dehnen W., 2000, ApJ, 536, L39 Dehnen W., 2001, MNRAS, 324, 273 Dehnen W., Aly H., 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1068 Deng H., Mayer L., Meru F., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1706.00417) Forgan D., Rice K., 2013a, MNRAS, 430, 2082 Forgan D., Rice K., 2013b, MNRAS, 432, 3168 Forgan D. H., Hall C., Meru F., Rice W. K. M., 2018, MNRAS, 474, 5036 Galvagni M., Mayer L., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2909 Galvagni M., Hayfield T., Boley A., Mayer L., Roskar R., Saha P., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1725 Gammie C. F., 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Gingold R. A., Monaghan J. J., 1982, Journal of Computational Physics, 46, 429 Hall C., Forgan D., Rice K., 2017, MNRAS, 470, 2517 Hartmann L., Kenyon S. J., 1996, ARA&A, 34, 207 Helled R., Bodenheimer P., 2011, Icarus, 211, 939 Hopkins P. F., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 53 Hubber D., et al., 2011a, SEREN: A SPH code for star and planet formation simulations, Astrophysics Source Code Li- brary (ascl:1102.010) Hubber D. A., Batty C. P., McLeod A., Whitworth A. P., 2011b, A&A, 529, A27 Humphries R. J., Nayakshin S., 2018, MNRAS, Kaufmann T., Mayer L., Wadsley J., Stadel J., Moore B., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 53 Kratter K. M., Lodato G., 2016, preprint, (arXiv:1603.01280) Kratter K. M., Murray-Clay R. A., Youdin A. N., 2010, ApJ, 710, 1375 Kuiper G. P., 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ence, 37, 1 Larson R. B., 1969, MNRAS, 145, 271 Low C., Lynden-Bell D., 1976, MNRAS, 176, 367 Machida M. N., Inutsuka S.-i., Matsumoto T., 2011, ApJ, 729, 42 Malik M., Meru F., Mayer L., Meyer M., 2015, ApJ, 802, 56 Masset F., 2000, A&AS, 141, 165 Masset F. S., 2002, A&A, 387, 605 Masset F. S., Casoli J., 2010, ApJ, 723, 1393 Masunaga H., Miyama S. M., Inutsuka S.-I., 1998, ApJ, 495, 346 Mayer L., Quinn T., Wadsley J., Stadel J., 2004, ApJ, 609, 1045 Mercer A., Stamatellos D., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 2 Meru F., Bate M. R., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2279 18 Fletcher et al. Moe M., Kratter K. M., Badenes C., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1808.02116) Monaghan J. J., 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543 Monaghan J. J., 1997, Journal of Computational Physics, 136, 298 Monaghan J. J., Lattanzio J. C., 1985, A&A, 149, 135 Mordasini C., Alibert Y., Benz W., Klahr H., Henning T., 2012, A&A, 541, A97 Morris J., Monaghan J., 1997, Journal of Computational Physics, 136, 41 Muller T. W. A., Kley W., Meru F., 2012, A&A, 541, A123 Muller S., Helled R., Mayer L., 2018, ApJ, 854, 112 Murray J., 1996, in Evans A., Wood J. H., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 208, IAU Colloq. 158: Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects. p. 115, doi:10.1007/978-94- 009-0325-834 Nayakshin S., 2010, MNRAS, 408, L36 Nayakshin S., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3194 Nayakshin S., 2017a, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 34, e002 Nayakshin S., 2017b, MNRAS, 470, 2387 Nayakshin S., Cha S.-H., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2099 Nayakshin S., Fletcher M., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1654 Price D. J., 2012, Journal of Computational Physics, 231, 759 Price D. J., Federrath C., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1659 Price D. J., et al., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1702.03930) Rafikov R. R., 2005, ApJ, 621, L69 Raghavan D., et al., 2010, ApJS, 190, 1 Rees M. J., 1976, MNRAS, 176, 483 Reggiani M., et al., 2016, A&A, 586, A147 Rice W. K. M., Lodato G., Armitage P. J., 2005, MNRAS, 364, L56 Rice K., Lopez E., Forgan D., Biller B., 2015, preprint, (arXiv:1508.06528) Santos N. C., et al., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1705.06090) Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Springel V., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105 Stamatellos D., 2015, ApJ, 810, L11 Stamatellos D., Inutsuka S.-i., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3110 Stamatellos D., Whitworth A. P., 2008, A&A, 480, 879 Stamatellos D., Whitworth A. P., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1563 Stone J. M., Norman M. L., 1992, ApJS, 80, 753 Syer D., Clarke C. J., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 758 Takami M., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1807.03499) Tanaka H., Takeuchi T., Ward W. R., 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257 Tobin J. J., et al., 2016, Nature, 538, 483 Toomre A., 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Troup N. W., et al., 2016, AJ, 151, 85 Tychoniec (cid:32)L., et al., 2018, preprint, (arXiv:1806.02434) Vazan A., Helled R., 2012, ApJ, 756, 90 Vigan A., et al., 2012, A&A, 544, A9 Vigan A., et al., 2017, preprint, (arXiv:1703.05322) Vorobyov E. I., Basu S., 2005, ApJ, 633, L137 Vorobyov E. I., Basu S., 2006, ApJ, 650, 956 Vorobyov E. I., Basu S., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1896 Wendland H., 1995, Adv. Comp. Math., 4, 389 Winn J. N., Fabrycky D. C., 2015, ARA&A, 53, 409 Zhu Z., Hartmann L., Nelson R. P., Gammie C. F., 2012a, ApJ, 746, 110 Zhu Z., Nelson R. P., Dong R., Espaillat C., Hartmann L., 2012b, ApJ, 755, 6 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author. MNRAS 000, 1 -- 18 (2017)
0907.2237	1	0907	2009-07-13T20:00:23	Removing systematics from the CoRoT light curves: I. Magnitude-Dependent Zero Point	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	This paper presents an analysis that searched for systematic effects within the CoRoT exoplanet field light curves. The analysis identified a systematic effect that modified the zero point of most CoRoT exposures as a function of stellar magnitude. We could find this effect only after preparing a set of learning light curves that were relatively free of stellar and instrumental noise. Correcting for this effect, rejecting outliers that appear in almost every exposure, and applying SysRem, reduced the stellar RMS by about 20 %, without attenuating transit signals.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy&Astrophysicsmanuscript no. 12037 April 3, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 Removing systematics from the CoRoT ⋆ light curves: I. Magnitude-Dependent Zero Point T. Mazeh1,2, P. Guterman3, S. Aigrain4, S. Zucker5, N. Grinberg6, A. Alapini4, R. Alonso3, M. Auvergne7, M. Barbieri3, P. Barge3, P. Bord´e8, F. Bouchy9, H. Deeg10, R. De la Reza11, M. Deleuil3, R. Dvorak12, A. Erikson13, M. Fridlund14, P. Gondoin14, L. Jorda3, H. Lammer15, A. L´eger8, A. Llebaria3, P. Magain16, C. Moutou3, M. Ollivier8, M. Paetzold17, F. Pont4, D. Queloz18, H. Rauer13,20, D. Rouan7, R. Sabo6, J. Schneider19, and G. Wuchterl20 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received / Accepted ABSTRACT This paper presents an analysis that searched for systematic effects within the CoRoT exoplanet field light curves. The analysis identified a systematic effect that modified the zero point of most CoRoT exposures as a function of stellar magnitude. We could find this effect only after preparing a set of learning light curves that were relatively free of stellar and instrumental noise. Correcting for this effect, rejecting outliers that appear in almost every exposure, and applying SysRem, reduced the stellar RMS by about 20%, without attenuating transit signals. Key words. methods: data analysis – methods: statistical – techniques: photometric – planetary systems – surveys 1. Introduction CoRoT was launched on December 2006 to perform wide-field accurate stellar photometry (Rouan et al. 1998; Baglin et al. 2006), aiming to study the internal structure of stars using seis- mology and to detect small planets using the transit method. Both goals required ultra-high accuracy, interruption-free pho- tometry, which the space platform, free from atmospheric dis- turbances, should afford. Nevertheless, the first six transiting planets discovered by CoRoT, CoRoT-1b to -6b (Barge et al. 2008; Alonso et al. 2008; Deleuil et al. 2008; Aigrain et al. 2008, Rauer et al. submitted; Fridlund et al., in preparation), all have a transit depth of 1–2%, easily detectable by ground-based photometry. Only at the first CoRoT international conference, held in February 2009, the CoRoT team announced the discov- ery of the super-Earth CoRoT-7b (Leger et al., submitted), with transit depth of 0.03%, which ground-based observations could never have detected. The light curve of the bright star CoRoT-7 is of excep- tional quality, with a RMS scatter over transit timescales of only 0.01%. However, the majority of CoRoT light curves contain systematics and correlated noise, which is probably associated with satellite jitter, stellar activity, cosmic ray impacts and pos- sibly other effects. Albeit extremely low compared to ground- based surveys (Aigrain et al. 2009), this noise should nonethe- less be removed before planets with shallow transits like the ones of CoRoT-7b could be detected. In order to remove the systematic effects we have previously applied SysRem (Tamuz et al. 2005) to the CoRoT data, result- ⋆ The CoRoT space mission, launched on December 27th 2006, has been developed and is operated by CNES, with the contribution of Austria, Belgium, Brazil, ESA, Germany, and Spain. CoRoT data become publicly available one year after re- lease to the Co-Is of the mission from the CoRoT archive: http://idoc-corot.ias.u-psud.fr/. ing in reduction of the noise level by 10–20%. However, SysRem was sensitive to temporal variability that was shared by many of the stars, and was not specifically tuned to detect collective ef- fects that showed up when considering the measurements of each exposure separately. One such obvious effect was the zero point of the different exposures, which could have been modulated by the satellite motion in and out of the Earth shadow and going through the South Atlantic Anomaly, and could also depend on the stellar characteristics. When we searched for such an effect in the LRa01 CoRoT run we discovered that the zero points of most exposures depended on the stellar magnitude. This could be noticed only after we prepared a 'learning' set of light curves that were relatively free of stellar and instrumental noise. When this effect was removed, the noise level was reduced by about 20% for the faint stars. Section 2 details our analysis, including the preparation of the learning set of light curves, and the procedure to remove the effect found, and Section 3 discusses in short our findings. 2. Data analysis Our analysis was done on the white light curves obtained during the 150-day CoRoT LRa01 run (Auvergne et al. 2009). We first transformed the CoRoT fluxes into magnitudes, and then sub- tracted from each star its median magnitude. The residuals of each measurement relative to its stellar median - {ri j}, where i was the star number and j was the exposure number, were the subject of this analysis. We concentrated on the residuals de- rived for any given exposure j0: {ri j0; i = 1, M}, where M was the number of stars in this CoRoT run, searching for systematic effects in exposure j0. In order to be able to notice relatively small systematic ef- fects we prepared 'clean' learning light curves by the following measures: 2 T. Mazeh et al.: Cleaning the CoRoT light curves – Divided the LRa01 run into 13 blocks, each block contained data taken over only ten days. – Removed invalid data marked by the CoRoT regular N2 pipeline and rejected outliers from each light curve on a tem- poral identification basis. – In each block, rejected the stars that showed high variability in that block, either because of stellar variability or because of obvious instrumental effects, such as hot pixel features. Thus, some stars appeared only in some of the blocks. – Removed long-term variability by subtracting a running me- dian, taken over 3 satellite orbits. Small hot-pixel features were also attenuated by the median filtering. – Considered the light curves from the two CCDs separately, but combined the two halves of each CCD together. This was done as we suspected that the two CCDs will have different systematics. – Some of the light curves were sampled with a rate of 32 sec, while most stars with a rate of 512 sec. To make the analy- sis even more difficult, some stars had a light curve that was first sampled with the 512 sec rate, which was then switched into the 32 sec. We therefore had to put all the 512 sec and 32 sec measurements of CoRoT together in a common syn- chronous grid. An accurate common 512 sec exposure time was emulated as CoRoT would have done on board, rather than obtained by interpolation. This enabled us to associate each of the stellar measurements with the correct exposure. As a result of our selection, we were left, in the first block on the E1 CCD for example, with 4111 learning light curves out of 5704 ones. Only after the preparation of the 'learning' sets of light curves the collective features of the data appeared in our analysis with relatively small spread, so we could accurately estimate and subrtact these features. We found that the zero points of most exposures depended on stellar magnitude, an effect that we dubbed MagZeP (Magnitude Zero Point). To show this effect we plotted in Figure 1 the resid- uals of two exposures, no. 12 and 55, from our first block. The figure showed two prominent features of the MagZeP effect: – The scatter around the general trend was larger for fainter stars – The residuals took a parabolic shape, with different curva- ture sign and slope for different exposures. The typical am- plitudes of this effect were 0.005 mag for the faint objects. While the first feature was expected, as the S/N is smaller, the second effect took us by surprise. To remove the MagZeP effect we fitted the residuals of each exposure j by a parabola that depended on the stellar magnitude mi: pi j = a0, j + a1, jmi + a2, jm2 i , and then derived new residuals ri j = ri j − pi j , (1) (2) where ri j presented our best estimate of the stellar magnitude, relative to its median. We also noticed that for almost every exposure some outliers clearly stood out, as could be seen in Figure 1. To identify these outliers we assigned to each measurement an error, σi j, based on the collective scatter at the corresponding exposure and mag- nitude. We then rejected residuals that were smaller than zero (after the removal of the parabola) by more than η times their error ri j ≤ ησi j , (3) where η was a parameter, taken in our present implementation of the algorithm to be equal to 2. Keeping the positive residuals ensured us that we did not attenuate any transit signal. Removing these exposure outliers further improved the stellar scatter. The parabola was derived by a robust regression based on iteratively reweighed least-squares fit, which was relatively insensitive to the presence of outliers. In this way, a robust result was obtained even without a need for additional fitting-clipping cycle. Finally, all CoRoT light curves were cleaned with the pa- rameters determined by the selected learning set of light curves. This step of the analysis produced a homogeneous set of light curves in each block. 3. Discussion We propose here a statistical algorithm to deal with the CoRoT data, as a complementary process of the regular N2 CoRoT pipeline. The latter includes only model-based corrections of identified physical effects, while ours, which is a generalization of a zero-point removal of each exposure (Tamuz et al. 2005; Collier Cameron et al. 2006), relies only on the collective effects identified in the data. We find that the zero point of each expo- sure depend on the stellar magnitude. Obviously, other effects can still be present in the data, and thus in our implementation we apply SysRem after the MagZeP removal. The results of applying MagZeP and outlier removal and then applying SysRem are depicted in Figure 2, which presents the ratio between the RMS before and after applying our ap- proach. We can see that the improvement is a strong function of the stellar magnitude, and the averaged improvement ratio is almost linear with the R magnitude, and can reach 25% for the faint stars. Most of the improvement is due to MagZeP and outlier removal, and adding SysRem has a minor impact on our approach. Applying SysRem alone does achieve less effective clean up. We find that the improvement of the light curve is less pronounced at the middle of the LRa01 run in both CCDs. This is because the CoRoT Earth-shadow crossing (see below) occurs only at the beginning and the end of the run, generating more pronounced systematic effects. One danger of removing collective effects from a set of light curves is that the process might attenuate the signal of a possi- ble transit. To show that this is not the case here we present in Figure 3 the light curve of CoRoT-7, after removing the stellar variability and then folding the residuals with the planetary or- bital period of 0.854 days, binning the data such that each bin presents an average of 10 measurements. For comparison, the figure also depicts the light curve before applying our analysis. The signal is clearer after our analysis. To look for the source of the MagZeP effect we considered the set of parameters of the fitted parabolas of all exposures - {a0, j, j = 1, N} for example, where N was the number of expo- sures included in the block being analysed. This set of param- eters reflected the zero-order brightness removed by our algo- rithm. We folded this set of parameters with the orbital period of the satellite, the results were being plotted in Figure 4. The two positive bumps seen in the figure occurred when the satellite was entering and exiting the Earth shadow, while the negative outliers, at phase 0.05 and 0.45, coincided with cross- ing the South Atlantic Anomaly (see for example Auvergne et al. T. Mazeh et al.: Cleaning the CoRoT light curves 3 Image no. 12 Image no. 55 −0.02 −0.015 −0.01 −0.005 . g a m 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 R Magnitude −0.02 −0.015 −0.01 −0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 R Magnitude Fig. 1. The residuals of two exposures as a function of their stellar R magnitude. The continuous line is our parabolic fit. The left- hand-side panel shows the residuals of exposure 2007-10-24T14:09:15.000, while the right-hand-side panel comes from exposure 2007-10-24T20:16:11.000. RMS Ratio after processing o i t a r s m r 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 11 12 13 14 15 16 R magnitude Fig. 2. The ratio between the RMS before and after our algorithm (MagZeP and exposure-outlier removal and SysRem) was applied. The figure presents 3893 stars observed by the E2 CCD in the first block of LRa01, with 1693 exposures 2009). We also noticed an overall slight curvature over the whole phase, with a small displacement between the two bumps. The reason for this feature was not clear. We wish we had a complete model that accounts for the MagZeP effect, which is probably associated with an additive and multiplicative factor of stellar flux. The parabolic fit we use is only an approximation to the exact function of the MagZeP effect. However, a detailed analysis of the nature of the effect is out of the scope of this paper and is therefore deferred for future work. The goal of this short communication is to point out to the effect and the impact of its removal. While trying to improve the algorithm and searching for other collective effects, we have processed the whole CoRoT N2 white colour dataset. The cleaned data are now available to the whole CoRoT community. Acknowledgements. We thank warmly the referee, Ronald Gilliland, for careful reading the manuscript and suggesting useful and thoughtful comments. T.M. wishes to acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Science, Culture and Sport of Israel for France-Israel collaboration in Astrophysics (grant no. 3-450) and the support by the ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (grant No. 655/07). S.Z. wishes to acknowledge support by the ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION – The Adler Foundation for Space Research (grant No. 119/07). References Aigrain, S., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, L43 Aigrain, S., et al. 2009, arXiv:0903.1829 Alonso, R., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L21 Auvergne, M., Bodin, P., Boisnard, L., Buey, J. -., Chaintreuil, S., & CoRoT team 2009, arXiv:0901.2206 Baglin, A., et al. 2006, 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 36, 3749 Barge, P., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L17 Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 799 Deleuil, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 889 4 T. Mazeh et al.: Cleaning the CoRoT light curves x 10−4 CoRoT−Exo−7 Before −8 −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6 8 x 10−4 CoRoT−Exo−7 After −8 −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6 8 l s a u d s e R i l s a u d s e R i 10 12 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Phase 10 12 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Phase Fig. 3. The folded and binned light curve of CoRoT-7, before and after our analysis. The Zero Point Correction i t n e c i f f e o C i t n o P o r e Z 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 −0.1 −0.2 −0.3 −0.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Satellite phase Fig. 4. The set of zero-order parameters of all parabolas of the first block, {a0, j, j = 1, N}, folded with the orbital period of the satellite. Rouan, D., Baglin, A., Copet, E., Schneider, J., Barge, P., Deleuil, M., Vuillemin, A., & L´eger, A. 1998, Earth Moon and Planets, 81, 79 Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1466 1 Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies at Harvard, 8 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 On Sabbatical leave from School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 3 Le Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, UMR 6110 CNRS, Technopole de Marseille-Etoile, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France 4 School of Physics, University of Exeter, Physics Building, Stocker Road, Exeter, Ex4 4QL, UK 5 Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 6 School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 7 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon, France lObserva- IAC, E-38205 La Laguna, Spain 8 IAS, Universit´e Paris XI, 91405 Orsay, France 9 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, 04870 St Michel toire,France 10 11 ON/MCT, 20921-030, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 12 IfA, University of Vienna, 1180 Vienna, Austria 13 Institute of Planetary Research, DLR, 12489 Berlin, Germany 14 RSSD, ESA/ESTEC, 2200 Noordwijk, The Netherlands 15 IWF, Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-8042 Graz, Austria 16 IAG, Universit´e de Li`ege, Li`ege 1, Belgium 17 RIU, Universitat zu Koln, 50931 Koln, Germany 18 Observatoire de Gen`eve, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 19 ZAA, TU Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany 20 LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon, France 21 Thuringer Landessternwarte, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany
1506.00713	2	1506	2016-03-18T21:56:49	Aggregate Particles in the Plumes of Enceladus	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Estimates of the total particulate mass of the plumes of Enceladus are important to constrain theories of particle formation and transport at the surface and interior of the satellite. We revisit the calculations of Ingersoll & Ewald (2011), who estimated the particulate mass of the Enceladus plumes from strongly forward scattered light in Cassini ISS images. We model the plume as a combination of spherical particles and irregular aggregates resulting from the coagulation of spherical monomers, the latter of which allows for plumes of lower particulate mass. Though a continuum of solutions are permitted by the model, the best fits to the ISS data consist either of low mass plumes composed entirely of small aggregates or high mass plumes composed of mostly spheres. The high particulate mass plumes have total particulate masses of (166 $\pm$ 42) $\times$ 10$^3$ kg, consistent with the results of Ingersoll & Ewald (2011). The low particulate mass plumes have masses of (25 $\pm$ 4) $\times$ 10$^3$ kg, leading to a solid to vapor mass ratio of 0.07 $\pm$ 0.01 for the plume. If indeed the plumes are made of such aggregates, then a vapor-based origin for the plume particles cannot be ruled out. Finally, we show that the residence time of the monomers inside the plume vents is sufficiently long for Brownian coagulation to form the aggregates before they are ejected to space.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Aggregate Particles in the Plumes of Enceladus Peter Gaoa,∗, Pushkar Kopparlaa, Xi Zhangb,c, Andrew P. Ingersolla aDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, MC 150-21, California Institute of bDepartment of Planetary Sciences and Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA cDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Abstract Estimates of the total particulate mass of the plumes of Enceladus are impor- tant to constrain theories of particle formation and transport at the surface and interior of the satellite. We revisit the calculations of Ingersoll and Ewald (2011), who estimated the particulate mass of the Enceladus plumes from strongly forward scattered light in Cassini ISS images. We model the plume as a combination of spherical particles and irregular aggregates result- ing from the coagulation of spherical monomers, the latter of which allows for plumes of lower particulate mass. Though a continuum of solutions are per- mitted by the model, the best fits to the ISS data consist either of low mass plumes composed entirely of small aggregates or high mass plumes composed of mostly spheres. The high particulate mass plumes have total particulate masses of (166 ± 42) × 103 kg, consistent with the results of Ingersoll and Ewald (2011). The low particulate mass plumes have masses of (25 ± 4) × 103 kg, leading to a solid to vapor mass ratio of 0.07 ± 0.01 for the plume. If ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Peter Gao) Preprint submitted to Icarus March 22, 2016 indeed the plumes are made of such aggregates, then a vapor-based origin for the plume particles cannot be ruled out. Finally, we show that the residence time of the monomers inside the plume vents is sufficiently long for Brownian coagulation to form the aggregates before they are ejected to space. Keywords: Enceladus, ices, photometry, radiative transfer, satellites; surfaces 1. Introduction Enceladus' plumes provide an indirect way to study the subsurface. In particular, the ratio of ice particle to vapor mass can serve as an important constraint of ice particle formation and transport (Ingersoll and Ewald, 2011, henceforth IE11). IE11 examined Cassini Imaging Science System (ISS) im- ages of the plumes at small scattering angles from 2.2− 5.3◦ , where forward scattering is dominated by ice grains as opposed to water vapor. They then fit the resulting phase curves to various mass and shape distributions, assum- ing that the ice grains are solid spherical or ellipsoidal particles. However, the large particle to vapor mass ratio calculated by IE11 could not be easily explained by any existing theoretical models. Furthermore, recent results from the Cassini Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA) (Kempf, S., Cassini Project Science Meeting, Jan 22, 2015, and private communication) indicate that the particulate mass may be a factor of ten lower than the estimates of IE11. Since the defining property of the plume particles is strong forward scatter- ing, an alternative model for the plume is one made up of aggregates. An aggregate is a particle of irregular shape composed of smaller subunits (or "monomers") stuck to each other. The monomers are usually composed 2 of simpler shapes, such a spheres, plates, or columns, depending on the for- mation mechanisms. Aggregates form under many different settings. For example, the hazes in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Titan are thought to be composed of hydrocarbon aggregates (West and Smith, 1991; Tomasko et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2013); Saturn's F-ring is likely populated by ice aggregate particles (Vahidinia et al., 2011); and cirrus cloud particles on Earth take on a variety of non-spherical shapes, ranging from fernlike and fractal geometries to aggregates of irregular shapes (Yang and Liou, 1998). In particular, ice clouds that form as a result of strong vertical motions are dominated by aggregate particles (Baum et al., 2011; Heymsfield et al., 2002). Since aggregates form under such a wide variety of conditions, it is plausible that they could form in the plumes of Enceladus. Thanks to the diversity of instruments on Cassini, the plumes are well studied. There are good estimates of water vapor mass from the Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph (UVIS) instrument (Tian et al., 2007; Hansen et al., 2011, for example), as well as that of other minor gaseous constituents, such as carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, and argon from the Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer (INMS) (Waite Jr et al., 2009). Data from Cassini CDA suggests that the ice particles in the plumes can be broadly classified into two types: slow, large, salt-rich grains that tend to fall back onto the surface, and fast, salt-poor grains that escape into the E-ring (Postberg et al., 2011). Ice particle velocity distributions were measured using the Visual and In- frared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) (Hedman et al., 2009) and ISS (IE11). However, the shapes of the particles remain mostly unconstrained by obser- vations and are usually assumed to be spherical or oblate/prolate, such as in 3 Porco et al. (2006) and IE11. In this study, we derive estimates for the total particulate mass of the Enceladus plumes by extending the range of possible particle shapes to aggregates. 2. Aggregate Model Aggregate particles are defined by two parameters: their fractal dimension D and their monomer radius rm. These two quantities are related to the number of monomers that make up the aggregate Nm and the radius of the aggregate particle r by Nm = (cid:18) r (cid:19)D . (1) rm A typical value of D for aggregates in the Solar System is around 2. For example, it has been shown that D = 2 is a good approximation for the aggregate particles in the Titan hydrocarbon haze, where the actual dimen- sion may vary between 1.75 and 2.5 (Cabane et al., 1993). D = 2 is also appropriate for snowflakes and cirrus cloud ice crystals on Earth, which have variations in D between 1.9 and 2.3 (Westbrook et al., 2006; Schmitt and Heymsfield, 2010). Zhang et al. (2013) further showed that D = 2 aggre- gates can be used to fit Cassini ISS observations of the Jupiter stratospheric aerosols. Such particles have masses that scale linearly with surface area, like a sheet, though the particle itself is a three dimensional object. As a result, these particles tend to have small masses associated with large scattering cross sections. By comparison, rm values vary considerably across different types of ag- gregates. For example, rm = 10 nm for the stratospheric aerosols of Jupiter (Zhang et al., 2013) and 40 nm for Titan's haze aggregates (Tomasko et al., 4 2009), but these values are easily dwarfed by that of Saturn's F ring parti- cles, which can reach a few microns (Vahidinia et al., 2011), while ice crystal monomers on Earth can be hundreds of microns across (Kajikawa and Heyms- field, 1989). We will therefore leave rm as a free parameter in our model that will be varied to best fit the data. As a simplification, we assume that all aggregates in the plume have monomers of the same rm. Equation 1 leads to a minimum size rmin for an aggregate of rmin = 2 1 D rm (2) where we have chosen Nm = 2 as the minimum number of monomers an aggregate can have. Particles with r < rmin are assumed to be spherical with radius r. To simplify the problem and reduce the number of free parameters, we further assume that both spherical and aggregate particles "share" the same particle size distribution dN dlnr = N0(r/r0)f−3/[1 + (r/r0)2f ], (3) which is the number of particles in the natural log of radius interval dln(r), with N0 as a parameter that scales with the particle number density, f as a positive width factor, and r0 as the median radius of the particle mass distribution given by dM (r) dr = 2M0 πr0 where M (r) = 2M0 π arctan 5 f (r/r0)f−1 1 + (r/r0)2f , (cid:19)f(cid:35) (cid:34)(cid:18) r r0 (4) (5) is the total mass of particles with radius between 0 and r, and M0 is the total mass of particles. r0 splits the mass distribution into equal halves, with the width of the distribution governed by f ; small f values indicate wide distributions while large f values indicate narrow distributions. M0, r0, and f are free to vary in the model during optimization of the fit to the data. Eqs. 3 - 5 are the same distribution functions given in IE11, which were chosen due to their relative simplicity and their ability to capture both sharply peaked and asymptotic functional forms with only two free parameters. Figure 1 shows a schematic of how the aggregate and spherical particles "share" the dM (r)/dr distribution in our model. Particles with r > rmin are assumed to be aggregates with radius r given in Eq. 1 and rm defined by Eq. 2; they follow the size distribution of Eq. 3 with some given r0 and f values. Particles with r < rmin are assumed to be spheres of radius r that follow the same size distribution as the aggregates, with the same r0 and f values. With these definitions, dM (r)/dr has a discontinuity at r = rmin. This is caused by the different ways the mass of single particles (aggregate or spheres) scales with r while keeping N0 fixed for both the aggregate and spherical sections of the size distribution. The discontinuity is not shown in Figure 1, and we avoid it in our calculations, as discussed below. 3. Observations and Model Setup Following the procedure of IE11, we use the following relationship to estimate total plume particulate mass (Eq. 4 of that paper): (6) R (θ) = M0 4ρice (cid:90) ApQscaP (θ)(dN/dln(r))dln(r) Vp(dN/dln(r))dln(r) 6 where M0 is now the total particulate mass of the plume; ApQsca is the scattering cross section of the particle, which, for spherical particles, can be split into the geometric cross section of the particle Ap = πr2 and the scattering efficiency Qsca; P (θ) is the scattering phase function; θ is the scattering angle, which is given in Table 1 of IE11; Vp is the solid volume of each particle, given by (4/3)πr3 for spheres and (4/3)πr3 mNm for aggregates; ρice = 0.917 g cm−3 is the density of ice; and r is the particle radius, as given for aggregates and spheres in Section 2. R(θ) is defined as (cid:90) I F R (θ) = dA (7) where I is the measured radiance, πF is the solar irradiance, and the integral is taken over the area A of the image projected onto a plane at the distance of Enceladus to Cassini. The values and associated uncertainties of R(θ) are also listed in Table 1 of IE11. Only the wide-angle camera (WAC) images are used. In order to remove the bias of the data towards scattering angles where more observations were taken, we repeat the procedure of IE11 and grouped the 18 brightness measurements into 10 data points by scattering angle, and averaged the brightness values and uncertainties within each group. In order to sample multiple scattering angles the observations were taken at multiple orbital phases. However, Hedman et al. (2013) showed that the brightness of the plumes varied as a function of orbital phase, even when scattering was taken into account, indicating variability in the intensity of the plumes. They showed that the plume brightness increased rapidly from an orbital phase of 90◦ to 180◦, while below 90◦ the changes in brightness were much more gradual (see their Figure 4). Our observations, as given in Table 7 1 of IE11, were taken at orbital phases of 7.68◦ to 55.93◦, well within the "gradual" part of the orbit. Therefore, while the intensity of the plume still changed during our observational period, we will assume that the changes are minor compared to brightness changes due to particle scattering. We calculate the Mie scattering cross section and phase function of the spherical particles using Grainger et al. (2004), while those of the aggregates are calculated using the model of Tomasko et al. (2008, henceforth T08), a detailed description of which can be found in the appendix of that paper. The T08 model is a fast parametrization valid only for D = 2 due to the computationally intensive calculations required for a model of aggregates of arbitrary dimension (Mishchenko et al., 1996); as discussed in Section 2, D = 2 is valid for many types of aggregates in the Solar System, including ice particles in Earth clouds. A visual description of such particles is found in Figure 1 of West and Smith (1991). The aggregate scattering model considers each aggregate to be a collection of spherical monomers that scatter and absorb as Mie spheres; the total intensity of the scattered light from the aggregate is then the superposed intensity of scattered light from all the monomers in the aggregate. For more complex interactions, such as repeated scattering and absorption by multiple monomers, correction factors are added that are functions of Nm, the refractive index, and the size parameter of the monomers xm = 2πrm λ (8) where λ is the wavelength of the radiation being scattered. The correction factors are empirical and listed in Table A2 of Appendix A of T08. Only 8 cases with xm between 10−4 and 1.5 have currently been validated; and ex- trapolations to different xm values become increasingly uncertain the farther they are from the tested range of values (see again Appendix A of T08). The T08 model has been used to fit observations of Titan's haze, as well as that of the stratospheric aerosols of Jupiter (Zhang et al., 2013) and aggregate particles created in laboratory experiments (Bar-Nun et al., 2008). We as- sume a real index of refraction of 1.31 and an imaginary index of refraction of 0.0005 for ice in our scattering calculations for the three Cassini ISS wave- length channels considered (VIO, 420 nm; CLR, 635 nm; IR3, 918 nm), as with IE11 (Meng et al., 2010). In order to avoid the discontinuity in dM (r)/dr, we treat particles of different sizes separately by discretizing dN/dlnr into 25 bins in our calcula- tions, with a minimum particle radius of 80 nm and a particle volume ratio of 2 between successive bins. We then approximate the integrals in Eq. 6 as summations over the size bins, so that different forms of Ap, Qsca, P (θ), and Vp can be used depending on whether the bin corresponds to spherical parti- cles or aggregate particles. This enables each integral to sum over both types of particles across the entire size range, provided N0 is a constant that drops out of Eq. 6, and ensures that M0 is a constant that applies to the entire (cid:82) Vp(dN/dln(r))dln(r). The minimum particle size is set plume, as M0 = ρice to prevent an infinite integral of dN/dlnr for f ≤ 3 in our numerical scheme, though the total mass and R(θ) are always finite for any positive value of f . This is because Vp scales as r3 for spheres and r2 for aggregates, and because Qsca scales as r4 when r → 0. The value of the minimum particle radius was picked such that it is much lower than the likely range of favorable rm values 9 estimated by fitting the data by hand. We have also confirmed, through tests of our model, that particles smaller than 80 nm do not contribute signficantly to the forward scattering for all reasonable model parameter values. 4. Fitting to Data We use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (Hastings, 1970) to optimize the fits to the data and obtain statistically significant confidence intervals for the optimized parameters, which consist of M0, rm, r0, and f , with D fixed to 2. This is the same number of parameters as IE11, though they had a particle aspect ratio rather than rm. The MCMC explores parameter space by comparing the likelihood of a model defined by one set of parameters with that defined by a perturbed set of parameters. The likelihood L of a model is defined as (cid:88) L = eL,L = −1 2 (xi − µi)2 i σ2 i (9) where xi is the ith data point, µi is the ith model point, and σ2 i is the variance of the ith data point, calculated from Table 1 of IE11. Models with high L values correspond to better fits to the data than models with low L values, and thus the sets of parameters that define the better-fit models are closer to the true values of these parameters than the sets of parameters that define the worse-fit models. At every link of the MCMC, one of the four parameters is chosen randomly to be perturbed by adding onto the original parameter value a perturbation, the magnitude of which is drawn from normal distributions of certain stan- dard deviations: 104 kg for M0; 0.5 µm for rm and r0, and 1 for f . The 10 likelihood of this perturbed set of parameters is then calculated according to Eq. 9. If the likelihood of the model defined by the perturbed set is greater than that of the original set, then the perturbed set of parameters are accepted as a new link in the chain and the new standard with which subsequent sets of perturbed parameters are compared; otherwise, the per- turbed set is accepted if the ratio of the likelihood of the model defined by the perturbed set to that of the original set is greater than a random number drawn from a uniform distribution from 0 to 1. In other words, if the L value of the model defined by the perturbed set is very low, i.e. a very bad fit to the data and thus a very low probability that the data is described by this model, then it is highly unlikely that it will be accepted. By calculating the likelihood of models defined by different sets of parameters with a bias pro- portional to L, the MCMC method samples the probability density function (PDF) of the parameters. The PDF of each parameter is then the histogram of the accepted parameter values. We use a total of 2 × 106 links in the MCMC, and the parameter PDFs are constructed from taking the histograms of the accepted values. Sensi- tivity tests are conducted by halving and doubling the widths of the normal distributions from which the perturbations at each step of the MCMC were drawn, with no major changes to our results. See Appendix A for further details on these sensitivity tests. We apply loose bounds to the parameters: M0 is restricted to positive values; r0 is bound between 0.2 and 20 µm and rm is limited to values between 0.08 and 14 µm to ensure that the radius grid captures most of the size distribution; and f is constrained between 0 and 10 to avoid size distributions 11 narrower than the resolution of the radius grid. The best fit parameters of IE11 are well within these bounds. If there arises a perturbation during a step of the MCMC that resulted in values of the parameters outside their bounds, then the perturbation is redrawn from its normal distribution until a value within the bounds results. 5. Results Figure 2 shows the results of the MCMC calculations in the form of scatter plots of the accepted sets of parameters for each parameter pair. Areas of parameter space with more accepted values (points) correspond to places of higher likelihood, and thus better fits to data. It is immediately clear that there are multiple families of solutions, which have been assigned different colored points. For example, the M0 vs. rm plot shows at least seven local maxima of accepted parameter sets, though the local maximum with the lowest M0 appears to be separate from the others. Conversely, the M0 vs. r0 and M0 vs. f plots show only three local maxima at distinct locations in parameter space, one at low M0 and two at high M0. These two high M0 families of solutions can be further split in terms of r0 and f , with one at high r0 and high f (and slightly lower M0) and one at low r0 and low f (and slightly higher M0). From the rm vs. r0 and rm vs. f plots we see that the local maximum with the second lowest rm is resticted to high r0 and high f values, and that it is the only local maximum out of the seven to exhibit this behavior. Therefore, the seven local maxima of rm can be distributed among the three local maxima in the other plots as follows: the local maximum with rm < 0.8 µm defines the low M0 family of solutions 12 (red); the local maximum with 0.8 µm < rm < 1.25 µm defines the high M0, r0, and f family of solutions (blue); and the remaining local maxima with rm > 1.25 µm defines the high M0 and low r0 and f family of solutions (green). In other words, the red points are solutions corresponding to low particulate mass plumes composed primarily of small aggregates with Nm > 100; the blue points are high particulate mass plume solutions consisting of large aggregates made up of large monomers, such that they also have Nm > 100; and the green points are also high particulate mass plume solutions, but they are comprised of a mixture of spheres and large aggregates composed of very few and very large monomers, which we term the "sphere-aggregate" solutions. Despite the distinctiveness of these solutions in parameter space, most of their xm values are >1.5, which is outside the validated range of the T08 model. Therefore, caution must be exercised when interpreting these re- sults. As there are currently no quantitaive estimates of the divergence of this approximate model from the detailed T-matrix calculations outside the validated range (Mishchenko et al., 1996), we compare our results to that of the fractal aggregate scattering model of Rannou et al. (1999, henceforth R99). The R99 model is semi-empirical and derives particle scattering prop- erties using interpolated values from the mean field approximation of Botet et al. (1997), which itself is based on an exact theory of scattering by ag- gregate particles (Xu, 1995). The R99 model has been validated to xm ∼ 8 (Coustenis et al., 2001; Rannou et al., 2002, 2004, 2010; Lavvas et al., 2010, for e.g.) and shows good agreement with the T08 model within the latter's validated range. Thus, it can be used as an approximate fiducial to evaluate 13 the accuracy of the T08 model beyond this range. Only rough agreement is necessary however, as the R99 model is more error-prone than the T08 model due to nonlinear effects in light scattering (T08). Figure 3 shows the percent difference in the scattering efficiency Qsca (top) and the phase function P(θ) (bottom) (see Eq. 6) between the R99 and T08 models for relevant scattering angles and size parameters. The comparison is done in the CLR wavelength channel with 300 monomers assumed for each case, which is expected for the small and large aggregate solutions given their rm and r0 values; the refractive indices used are those of water ice (Section 3) and the fractal dimension is set to 2. The xm values of each of the colored phase curves in the bottom panel are indicated by the same colored points in the top panel. The comparison shows that the Qsca and P(θ) values for the two models agree to within 20% for most xm < 3.5, thereby extending the range of validity of the T08 model. For the small aggregates, xm ∼ 3 for the CLR channel (assuming rm ∼ 0.3 µm), and thus it is a valid family of solutions. Conversely, the large aggregates have xm ∼ 10 for the CLR channel (assuming rm ∼ 1 µm), which is well outside the extended validity range, and therefore calls into question the existence of this family of solutions. An additional issue with the large aggregate solutions is its high r0 value (∼ 20 µm), which goes against previous estimates of the sizes of the Enceladus plume particles of a few µm (Kieffer et al., 2009; Hedman et al., 2009). The sphere-aggregate solutions are largely independent of the limitations of the T08 model, as most of the forward scattering is due to spherical particles. From this exercise it is clear that the small and sphere-aggregate solutions are likely real, but that the large aggregate solutions may not be. Therefore, 14 we will ignore the large aggregates in the remainder of this work. The left side of Figure 4 shows the PDFs of the four varied parameters for the small aggregate solution, generated by marginalizing the 2D distributions of Figure 2 along one dimension for the small aggregate solution only and normalizing the area of the resulting 1D histograms. The most probable values - the maximum likelihood estimates - correspond to the peaks of the PDFs, marked by the green lines. Models generated from these parameter values are most likely to describe the data. For the M0, rm, and r0 PDFs, the 68% (1σ) confidence intervals are enclosed by the blue lines, which indicate the smallest interval in parameter space that encloses 68% of the accepted values. The PDF of f does not have a well-defined peak, and thus a lower limit is given, with the 68% confidence interval now defined as the 68% of accepted values immediately below the most probable value. Table 1 gives these most probable values and the associated 68% confidence intervals, which we set to be the ranges of uncertainty in our fit to data. The small aggregate plume solution yields a most probable r0 consistent with the r0 of the spherical particles of IE11, but the total plume mass is ∼ 6 times lower. Meanwhile, the PDF of f is very broad, meaning that this parameter is not well-constrained by the Cassini ISS data. The lack of a upper limit allows for large f values, leading to narrow size distributions centered at r0, with low abundances of both smaller and larger particles. This is consistent with a scenario where the smaller monomers are depleted to form small aggregates of median radius r0. The right side of Figure 4 shows the PDFs of the sphere-aggregate so- lutions. As before, the 68% confidence intervals are shown for PDFs with 15 well-defined peaks (M0 and f ), while for the r0 PDF only the lower limits are given. The rm PDF is multimodal and thus does not have a well-defined most-probable value or confidence interval. This is likely due to the lim- itations of the T08 model, as the corresponding xm values are far greater than even the extended validity range given above. Beyond rm > 6 µm, spherical particles dominate the particle population, and thus rm becomes unconstrained. The results of IE11 indicate that, for spherical particles, mass distri- butions with f = 1 to 2 best fit the data. This is consistent with our sphere-aggregate particle plume results. Our M0 and r0 estimates for the sphere-aggregate solutions are also consistent with IE11, though the PDF for r0 has a significant tail towards larger values. This highlights a deficiency in forward scattering measurements, as more massive particles are difficult to observe due to their low surface to volume ratio. Therefore, the impact of massive particles on the phase curves is minimal, allowing the results to be poorly constrained at large particle sizes. Figure 5 gives representative best fits to the VIO (top), CLR (middle), and IR3 (bottom) channels of the Cassini ISS data for the small aggregate (red) and sphere-aggregate (green) particle solutions, the latter of which reproduces the lower left panel of Figure 6 of IE11. In our case, the small aggregate solution provides the best fit, as defined by its reduced chi-square value χ2 r = 1 N − n − 1 (cid:88) i (xi − µi)2 σ2 i (10) where N = 10 is the number of data points being fitted to, n = 4 is the 16 that of Eq. 9. Lower χ2 r values indicate better fits, though if χ2 number of parameters, and the variables in the summation are the same as r (cid:28) 1 then r = 0.71 for the the error bars on the observations are likely overestimated. χ2 small aggregate solution fit and χ2 r = 1.5 for the sphere-aggregate solution fit. Both solutions give similar fits for the VIO and CLR channels, but differ significantly in the IR3 channel at scattering angles < 2◦. Whereas the small aggregate model curve features a broad forward scattering peak, the sphere-aggregate model curve's forward scattering peak is much narrower in IR3. The width of the forward scattering peak is related to r0 (IE11), but also rm in the case of aggregates (Lavvas et al., 2010); large particles result in narrower/sharper peaks while smaller particles result in broader peaks. Therefore, as the small aggregate particles have small rm values, their forward scattering peaks are the most broad, increasing R(θ) at larger scattering angles and prompting low M0 values. Meanwhile, the lack of small monomers in the sphere-aggregate particles narrows the forward scattering peak, resulting in low values at large θ, and a higher M0 than for the small aggregate solution. It is interesting to note that only the IR3 channel offers a way to discrim- inate between the two solutions. This is caused by the strong dependence of the intensity of scattered light on the particle size parameter xm. In our fits there are two ranges of particle sizes to consider: the small aggregate monomer radius ∼ 0.3 µ m and the median particle radius for the small ag- gregate and sphere-aggregate solutions ∼ 4 µm; the intensity of the scattered light will depend on a combination of the particle radius and the monomer radius, if applicable. For the VIO and CLR channels (λ = 420 and 635 17 nm, respectively), both the small aggregate and sphere-aggregate particles are much larger than the wavelengths considered, leading to narrow forward scattering peaks. However, for the IR3 channel (λ = 918 nm), the small aggregate monomer radius is now much smaller than the wavelength, lead- ing to a much broader forward scattering peak. Similarly, the low f value of the sphere-aggregate solution means that there exists a great number of small particles that are responsible for much of the scattering, which are now much smaller than the channel wavelength, again leading to a wider forward scattering peak. In obtaining two separate families of solutions, we have shown that de- generacy exists in the ISS data from IE11 when both spherical and aggregate particles are considered. This degeneracy can be broken by an independent mass measurement, such as from Cassini CDA. 6. Discussion We can calculate the solid to vapor mass ratio of the plume for the small aggregate solution following the procedure described in IE11. We derive a value for the particulate column mass abundance M p col by relating it to the I/F values of the Cassini ISS NAC image from IE11 using their Eq. 8, I F = M p col M0 R(θ) = K0(θ)M p col, (11) where R(θ) is defined in Eq. 7. Dividing M p col by the vapor column mass abundance, M v col, at the same altitude above Enceladus then gives the solid to vapor mass ratio of the plume at that altitude. From the small aggregate curve (red) in Figure 5, we interpolate a R(θ) value of 6.4 × 103 km2 for the 18 CLR channel at θ = 2.38◦, the wavelength channel and scattering angle of the NAC image, respectively. This is slightly higher than the value given in IE11, 5.4 × 103 km2, owing to the different model curves used for the interpolation. Setting M0 to (25 ± 4) × 103 kg for the small aggregate solution and I/F to 0.07, the brightest pixel value of the NAC image above background (as with col = (2.7 ± 0.4) × 10−7 kg m−2 for that pixel, which col value calculated by IE11. The altitude IE11), we find that M p is ∼ 7 times lower than the M p above Enceladus that corresponds to that pixel is similar to that probed by the occultations carried out by Hansen et al. (2011) to measure M v col using Cassini UVIS. Therefore, the solid to vapor mass ratio can be obtained by dividing the M p col value derived here by the M v col value derived from averaging the second column of Table 1 of Hansen et al. (2011). This gives a solid to vapor mass ratio for the small aggregate plumes of M p col M v col = 0.07 ± 0.01, (12) which is again 7 times lower than that of IE11. The error arises from uncer- tainties in both the solid and vapor column mass abundances and is likely underestimated, as we have assumed zero uncertainty for the R(θ = 2.38◦) and I/F values. It should be noted that, while K0(θ) is defined using all available WAC images, the comparison with UVIS requires that we use just the brightest pixel of the one NAC image to set the I/F value. In other words, the global I/F values of the plume in the WAC images are assumed to be the same as that of the brightest plume pixel in the NAC image, which is equivalent to assuming that the particle size distribution is independent of altitude above Enceladus. This is only an approximation, as evidence exists 19 that the particle size distribution does change with altitude (Hedman et al., 2009; Postberg et al., 2011). However, for simplicity we do not consider this effect in this work. Our calculated solid to vapor ratio is consistent with that of Kieffer et al. (2009), who provided an upper bound of ∼ 0.1− 0.2 using observations from Cassini ISS and UVIS (Porco et al., 2006). It is also consistent with the lower end of the range of solid to vapor ratios (∼ 0.01 − 100) calculated by Hedman et al. (2009) using Cassini VIMS observations and spherical and irregular particle scattering models, though aggregates were not considered. The K0(θ) quantity in Eq. 11 is extremely useful as it can readily convert an observed I/F value into the column mass abundance. It also varies de- pending on the particle scattering properties, wavelength of scattered light, and particle size distribution. Figure 6 shows the K0(θ) values of the small (solid lines) and sphere-aggregate (dashed lines) solutions at scattering an- gles between 0◦ and 50◦ for the VIO (blue), CLR (green), and IR3 (red) wavelength channels. The small aggregate K0(θ) values are, as expected, higher than that of the sphere-aggregate solution, since there is less mass for the same intensity of forward scattering. The sphere-aggregate K0(θ) val- ues are typically within 10% of those of IE11, further reinforcing the lack of dependence of the sphere-aggregate solutions on the limitations of the T08 model. A full set of K0(θ) values for the two families of solutions and the best fit solution of IE11 at the Cassini WAC and NAC channel wavelengths can be found in the online supplemental material. Aside from what can be retrieved from observations, it is also impera- tive that the particle solutions are physical and adhere to theoretical con- 20 straints of formation and evolution. As IE11 has already considered high mass plumes, we will focus on the low mass small aggregate solutions and their possible formation mechanisms for the remainder of this work. Aggregate particles in the Solar System typically form through the co- agulation of monomers, a process that depends heavily on the free-floating monomer number density (Lavvas et al., 2010, for e.g.,), i.e. those not already incorporated into aggregates. Therefore, much of the coagulation process must take place within the plume vents, where the particle number density is higher. This is consistent with our small aggregate particle solution, which shows a low abundance of monomers compared to aggregates in the plume, as the monomers must have already coagulated to form aggregates before they were ejected into space. The residence time of particles inside the plume vents is of order D/v, where D is the depth of the liquid vapor interface and v is the average velocity of the particles. In order for complete coagulation of monomers within the plume vents, this residence time must be greater or equal to the coagulation time scale, approximated by (cid:32) 1 n τcoag = (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) dn dt (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) (cid:33)−1 = 1 nK , (13) where n is the free-floating monomer number density in the vent, and K is the coagulation kernel. In the free molecular limit (Knudsen number >> 1), the Brownian coagulation kernel for two spherical particles with radii r1 and r2 is (cid:118)(cid:117)(cid:117)(cid:116)6kT ρp (cid:32) 1 r3 1 (cid:33) , + 1 r3 2 K = (r1 + r2)2 (14) where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and ρp is the solid 21 particle density (0.917 g cm−3). Setting r1 = r2 = rm, (cid:118)(cid:117)(cid:117)(cid:116)192kT rm ρp K = (15) (Pruppacher and Klett, 1978). To find a value for the coagulation time scale, we consider the rate at which particulate mass is emerging from the vents, which can be expressed as dMp dt = 4 3 πr3 mρpnAv = ρmAv, (16) where ρm is the total mass of particulates per unit volume and A is the total vent area of the Enceladus plumes. IE11 gives this rate as dMp/dt = 51 kg s−1, but the reduced plume mass of the small aggregate solutions results in a smaller value. Rather than assuming that dMp/dt is linearly proportional to M0 however, we instead appeal to the solid to vapor mass ratio by considering the rate at which vapor is emerging from the vents, dMv/dt, which has been determined by Hansen et al. (2011) to be ∼ 200 kg s−1 based on Cassini UVIS observations. Thus, dMv dt = ρvAv = 200 kg s−1, (17) where ρv is the density of the vapor at the liquid-vapor interface, 4.85 × 10−3 kg m−3 at T = 273 K. Dividing Eq. 16 by Eq. 17 gives us the solid to vapor mass ratio ∼ [dMp/dt / dMv/dt] and allows us to eliminate A and v. Substituting the result into Eq. 13 then allows us to eliminate n. The necessary condition for the completion of monomer coagulation before exiting the vent then becomes 22 (cid:18)4 3 1 K (cid:19) ρp ρv πr3 m D v > τcoag = dMv/dt dMp/dt ∼ 20 s (18) where we use rm = 0.3 µm and T = 273 K. For [dMp/dt / dMv/dt] we use the solid to vapor mass ratio derived in Eq. 12. Several assumptions have gone into Eq. 18. One is that the particles and the vapor emanate from the same liquid-vapor interface, or at least very close above it in the vent. This is necessary to maintain high T and ρp values. If the particles form in flight higher up in the vent, as in a convective cloud, the reduction in ρp due to lower T and/or condensation on the vent walls would drastically increase τcoag. The fact that some of the plume particles are Na-rich (Postberg et al., 2009, 2011) argues that they originate from the liquid, but we cannot rule out a vapor origin for the Na-poor particles. Another assumption is that the different parts of the erupting area A behave the same way whether they are a single crack running the length of each tiger stripe, a series of 100 discrete sources (Porco et al., 2014), or some combination of the two (Tian et al., 2007; Hansen et al., 2011; Postberg et al., 2011; Spitale et al., 2015, for e.g.). A third assumption is that the solid to vapor mass ratio remains the same as the plumes vary with orbitial phase (Hedman et al., 2013). These assumptions are difficult to test, but they seem reasonable. A fourth assumption is that the relevant vapor density and velocity are close to those at the liquid-vapor interface and not those at the top of the vent where the particles and vapor exit to space. From the vertical distri- bution of particles exiting the vent, one infers velocities of order 60–90 m s−1 (Porco et al., 2006; IE11). However, the particles are accelerated to this 23 speed within a few meters of the surface (Schmidt et al., 2008; Ingersoll and Pankine, 2010), so the exit speed underestimates the time spent in the vent during which coagulation takes place. Postberg et al. (2009) use 500 m s−1 for the speed of the vapor and the triple point value for its density, but Nakajima and Ingersoll (Submitted) point out that these are overestimates. Their model includes friction with the walls of the crack as the gas flows upward. This produces backpressure at the liquid-vapor interface, and for a long, narrow crack the backpressure severely limits the evaporation rate and the upward velocity. For crack widths less than 0.1 m, the upward velocity is less than 10 m s−1 below depths of 1 km. If the evaporating surface is another 1 km below that level, the time spent in the vent is well over 100 s and the condition for coagulation of aggregates (Eq. 18) is comfortably sat- isfied. Crack width is an important parameter, since it affects the velocity. Nakajima and Ingersoll (Submitted) derive their estimate by matching the ratio of the power released through latent heat to that released through in- frared radiation, but one should remember that these numbers are uncertain by factors of 2 or more. Our results favor a less violent source for the plumes than the earlier results of IE11. Here, "less violent" means steady, controlled evaporation rather than explosive boiling. For example, it could be that most of the ice particles condense directly from the expanding vapor above the liquid-vapor interface rather than erupt as a bubbly liquid, which then breaks up and freezes into small ice particles in the vacuum of space. Alternatively, the particles could be generated by bubbles of methane or CO2 rising through liquid water and breaking at the surface, thereby sending up a fine spray of ice 24 particles. Porco et al. (2006) mentioned two extremes: particles condensing directly from the vapor and particles forming from the breakup of a boiling liquid, the latter analogous to a cold Yellowstone geyser. The relatively large solid to vapor ratio of IE11 favors the violent source, while the lower ratio of our small aggregate solution allows for less violent sources. Thus, the present results make the ISS data compatible with a wider variety of sources than the IE11 results. Schmidt et al. (2008) and Ingersoll and Pankine (2010) used hydrody- namic models to simulate the condensation of ice particles from water vapor, and obtained solid to vapor mass ratios of 0.05 - 0.06 and 0.015, respec- tively. The lower value calculated by Ingersoll and Pankine (2010) results from the condensation of vapor onto the vent walls, which Schmidt et al. (2008) did not consider. These values of the solid to vapor mass ratios are more consistent with our small aggregate solution than with the results of IE11. Kieffer et al. (2006) considered explosive decomposition of a hydrate clathrate that contains methane and other gases in much greater abundances than their solubility in liquid water would allow. The solid to vapor mass ratio of such an event is uncertain, but it could be lower than that quoted by IE11 and closer to the ratio derived here from the small aggregate solution. Meanwhile, Hsu et al. (2015) and Postberg et al. (2009, 2011) showed that silica grains and sodium salts are present in both E ring and plume parti- cles, which argues strongly for frozen droplets originating from a salty liquid rather than ice particles forming directly from vapor condensation. Postberg et al. (2009) suggested that ascending bubbles of plume gases (CO2, N2, CO, CH4) can disperse the liquid droplets into the vapor, and that the evapora- 25 tion of the boiling liquid source is taking place over a large horizontal area so that freezing of the vents is suppressed. Nakajima and Ingersoll (Submit- ted) showed that the backpressure due to friction on the walls of the channel could severely limit the evaporation rate. Ingersoll and Nakajima (Submit- ted) argue that this "controlled boiling" allows bubbles of vapor to break at the surface instead of throwing up large amounts of spray as in boiling into vacuum. All of this points to a relatively gentle source and a relatively low solid to vapor mass ratio. Our small aggregate solution does not rule out a vapor-based source for the plume particles. Parkinson et al. (2008) showed that spherical particles with radii similar to rm can form from water vapor nucleating on involatile grains in a few seconds, while spherical particles with radii up to 3 µm can form by condensation in about 100 s, though large condensation nuclei and/or a high density of water vapor may be necessary. Similarly, non-spherical ice crystals resembling aggregates, e.g. dendritic shapes, can form directly from condensation and nucleation of water vapor, with growth rates comparable to that of spherical particles (Pruppacher and Klett, 1978). Bullet rosettes – highly non-spherical, polycrystalline ice particles made up of clumps of hexagonal columns – can also yield high scattering cross sections for a small particle mass, but they are formed by the fracturing of ice during the freezing of a large water drop (Baum et al., 2011). We have shown that forward scattering observations of the Enceladus plumes from Cassini ISS can be well-fit by plumes made up of ice aggregates and solid ice spheres. This results in a bifurcation in the allowed total partic- ulate mass of the plumes: small aggregate plumes are six times less massive 26 than plumes made of larger aggregates and spheres. The small aggregate plumes, in particular, lead to a solid to vapor mass ratio of 0.07 ± 0.01, which is suggestive of a "gentle source" for the plume particles. We thank Y. L. Yung and H. Ngo for their valuable input. P. Gao and P. Kop- parla were supported in part by an NAI Virtual Planetary Laboratory grant from the University of Washington to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and California Institute of Technology under solicitation NNH12ZDA002C and Cooperative Agreement Number NNA13AA93A. X. Zhang was supported by the Bisgrove Scholar Program at the University of Arizona. A. P. Inger- soll was supported by the Cassini Project and NASA's Cassini Data Analysis Program. References Bar-Nun, A., Dimitrov, V., Tomasko, M., 2008. Titan's aerosols: Comparison between our model and DISR findings. Planetary and Space Science 56 (5), 708–714. Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Xie, Y., Bansemer, A., Hu, Y.-X., Zhang, Z., 2011. Improvements in shortwave bulk scattering and absorption models for the remote sensing of ice clouds. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 50 (5), 1037–1056. Botet, R., Rannou, P., Cabane, M., 1997. Mean-field approximation of Mie scattering by fractral aggregates of identical spheres. Applied Optics 36, 8791–8797. 27 Cabane, M., Rannou, P., Chassefiere, E., Israel, G., 1993. Fractal aggregates in Titan's atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science 41 (4), 257–267. Coustenis, A., Gendron, E., Lai, O., Veran, J. P., Woillez, J., Combes, M., Vapillon, L., Fusco, T., Mugnier, L., Rannou, P., 2001. Images of Titan at 1.3 and 1.6 m with adaptive optics at the CFHT. Icarus 154, 501–515. Grainger, R. G., Lucas, J., Thomas, G. E., Ewen, G. B. L., 2004. Calculation of Mie derivatives. Applied Optics 43, 5386–5393. Hansen, C. J., Shemansky, D. E., Esposito, L. W., Stewart, A. I. F., Lewis, B. R., Colwell, J. E., Hendrix, A. R., West, R. A., Waite, J. H., Teolis, B., et al., 2011. The composition and structure of the Enceladus plume. Geophysical Research Letters 38 (11). Hastings, W. K., 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57, 97–109. Hedman, M. M., Gosmeyer, C. M., Nicholson, P. D., Sotin, C., Brown, R. H., Clark, R. N., Baines, K. H., Buratti, B. J., Showalter, M. R., 2013. An ob- served correlation between plume activity and tidal stresses on Enceladus. Nature 500 (7461), 182–184. Hedman, M. M., Nicholson, P. D., Showalter, M. R., Brown, R. H., Buratti, B. J., Clark, R. N., 2009. Spectral observations of the Enceladus plume with Cassini-VIMS. The Astrophysical Journal 693 (2), 1749. Heymsfield, A. J., Lewis, S., Bansemer, A., Iaquinta, J., Miloshevich, L. M., Kajikawa, M., Twohy, C., Poellot, M. R., 2002. A general approach for 28 deriving the properties of cirrus and stratiform ice cloud particles. Journal of the atmospheric sciences 59 (1), 3–29. Hsu, H. W., Postberg, F., Sekine, Y., Shibuya, T., Kempf, S., Hornyi, M., Juhsz, A., Altobelli, N., Suzuki, K., Masaki, Y., Kuwatani, T., Tachibana, S., Sirono, S., Moragas-Klostermeyer, G., Srama, R., 2015. Ongoing hy- drothermal activities within Enceladus. Nature 519, 207–210. Ingersoll, A. P., Ewald, S. P., 2011. Total particulate mass in Enceladus plumes and mass of Saturns E ring inferred from Cassini ISS images. Icarus 216 (2), 492–506. Ingersoll, A. P., Nakajima, M., Submitted. Controlled boiling on Enceladus. 2. Model of the liquid-filled cracks. Icarus. Ingersoll, A. P., Pankine, A. A., 2010. Subsurface heat transfer on Enceladus: Conditions under which melting occurs. Icarus 206 (2), 594–607. Kajikawa, M., Heymsfield, A. J., 1989. Aggregation of ice crystals in cirrus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 46 (20), 3108–3121. Kieffer, S. W., Lu, X., Bethke, C. M., Spencer, J. R., Marshak, S., Navrot- sky, A., 2006. A clathrate reservoir hypothesis for Enceladus' south polar plume. Science 314, 1764–1766. Kieffer, S. W., Lu, X., McFarquar, G., Wohletz, K. H., 2009. A redetermina- tion of the ice/vapor ratio of Enceladus plumes: Implications for sublima- tion and the lack of a liquid water reservoir. Icarus 203, 238–241. 29 Lavvas, P., Yelle, R. V., Griffith, C. A., 2010. Titans vertical aerosol structure at the Huygens landing site: Constraints on particle size, density, charge, and refractive index. Icarus 210, 832–842. Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K. N., Laszlo, I., 2010. Single-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal mineral dust aerosols: A database for application to radiative transfer calculations. Journal of Aerosol Science 41, 501–512. Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., Mackowski, D. W., 1996. T-matrix compu- tations of light scattering by nonspherical particles: A review. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 55, 535–575. Nakajima, M., Ingersoll, A. P., Submitted. Controlled boiling on Enceladus. 1. Model of the vapor-driven jets. Icarus. Parkinson, C. D., Liang, M.-C., Yung, Y. L., Kirschivnk, J. L., 2008. Hab- itability of Enceladus: Planetary conditions for life. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 38 (4), 355–369. Porco, C., DiNino, D., Nimmo, F., 2014. How the geysers, tidal stresses and thermal emission across the south polar terrain of Enceladus are related. The Astronomical Journal 148, 45–68. Porco, C. C., Helfenstein, P., Thomas, P. C., Ingersoll, A. P., Wisdom, J., West, R., Neukum, G., Denk, T., Wagner, R., Roatsch, T., et al., 2006. Cassini observes the active south pole of Enceladus. Science 311, 1393– 1401. 30 Postberg, F., Kempf, S., Schmidt, J., Brilliantov, N., Beinsen, A., Abel, B., Buck, U., Srama, R., 2009. Sodium salts in E-ring ice grains from an ocean below the surface of Enceladus. Nature 459, 1098–1101. Postberg, F., Schmidt, J., Hillier, J., Kempf, S., Srama, R., 2011. A salt-water reservoir as the source of a compositionally stratified plume on Enceladus. Nature 474 (7353), 620–622. Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., 1978. Microphysics of clouds and precipita- tion. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland. Rannou, P., Cours, T., Le Moulic, S., Rodriguez, S., Sotin, C., Drossart, P., Brown, R., 2010. Titan haze distribution and optical properties retrieved from recent observations. Icarus 208, 850–867. Rannou, P., Hourdin, F., McKay, C. P., 2002. A wind origin for Titan's haze structure. Nature 418, 853–856. Rannou, P., Hourdin, F., McKay, C. P., Luz, D., 2004. A coupled dynamics- microphysics model of Titan's atmosphere. Icarus 170, 443–462. Rannou, P., McKay, C. P., Botet, R., Cabane, M., 1999. Semi-empirical model of absorption and scattering by isotropic fractal aggregates of spheres. Planetary and Space Science 47, 385–396. Schmidt, J., Brilliantov, N., Spahn, F., Kempf, S., 2008. Slow dust in Ence- ladus' plume from condensation and wall collisions in tiger stripe fractures. Nature 451, 685–688. 31 Schmitt, C. G., Heymsfield, A. J., 2010. The dimensional characteristics of ice crystal aggregates from fractal geometry. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 67, 1605–1616. Spitale, J. N., Hurford, T. A., Rhoden, A. R., Berkson, E. E., Platts, S. S., 2015. Curtain eruptions from Enceladus south-polar terrain. Nature 521, 57–60. Tian, F., Stewart, A. I. F., Toon, O. B., Larsen, K. W., Esposito, L. W., 2007. Monte Carlo simulations of the water vapor plumes on Enceladus. Icarus 188 (1), 154–161. Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L., Dafoe, L. E., See, C., 2009.
1406.2376	4	1406	2015-12-21T04:12:57	Tidal dissipation in a homogeneous spherical body. I. Methods	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	A formula for the tidal dissipation rate in a spherical body is derived from first principles, to correct some mathematical inaccuracies found in the literature. The development is combined with the Darwin-Kaula formalism for tides. Our intermediate results are compared with those by Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984). When restricted to the special case of an incompressible spherical planet spinning synchronously without libration, our final formula can be compared with the commonly used expression from Peale & Cassen (1978, Eqn. 31). The two turn out to differ. In our expression, the contributions from all Fourier modes are positive-definite, this not being the case of the formula from Ibid. (The presence of negative terms in their formula was noticed by Makarov 2013.) Examples of application of our expression for the tidal damping rate are provided in the work by Makarov and Efroimsky (2014).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Extended version of a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal 795 : 6 (2014) 5 1 0 2 c e D 1 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 4 v 6 7 3 2 . 6 0 4 1 : v i X r a Tidal dissipation in a homogeneous spherical body. I. Methods Michael Efroimsky and Valeri V. Makarov US Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington DC 20392 [email protected] , [email protected] ABSTRACT A formula for the tidal dissipation rate in a spherical body is derived from first principles, to correct some mathematical inaccuracies found in the literature. The development is combined with the Darwin-Kaula formalism for tides. Our intermediate results are compared with those by Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984). When restricted to the special case of an incompressible spherical planet spinning synchronously without libration, our final formula can be compared with the commonly used expression from Peale & Cassen (1978, Eqn. 31). The two turn out to differ. While the said expression from Ibid. was intended solely for a synchronously rotating body, our formula is for an arbitrary spin state. Examples of the application of our expression for the tidal damping rate are provided in the work by Makarov & Efroimsky (2014). 1. Motivation and plan The tidal heating of planets and moons has long been a key area of planetary science. Accurate investigation into this process requires numerical integration of dissipation over layers of the perturbed body. At the same time, it is common to infer qualitative conclusions from approximations based on modeling the body with a homogeneous sphere of a certain rheology. However, the simplistic nature of the approach limits the precision of the ensuing conclusions. For example, the presence of a sizable molten core, like in Mercury, may increase the damping rate, compared to a homogeneous body. Still, estimates obtained with our simplified, homogeneous-sphere model should be accurate within a factor of several -- thus -- 2 -- (1) serving as a useful guidance for solar system bodies and (2) being completely legitimate for exoplanets, as our knowledge of their structure is speculative at best. In our paper, we derive from the first principles a formula for the tidal heating rate in a tidally perturbed homogeneous sphere. We compare our result with the formulae used in the literature and point out the differences. In Sections 3 - 5, we present an accurate re-examination of the standard integral ex- pression for the damping rate in a homogeneous incompressible sphere subject to tides. The check is necessary because in previous studies the expression was derived in an ad hoc man- ner, sometimes with demonstrable mathematical inaccuracies. The conventional derivation begins with the general formula for the power P = Z ρE v · ∇VE ′ d3r written in the Eulerian description (i.e., via coordinates associated with a deformed body). Its time average is then cast into the form of hPi = 1 4πGR ∞ Xl=2 (2 l + 1) Z (cid:28) Wl (cid:5) U l (cid:29) dS which is in the Lagrangian language (an integral over an undeformed body). In the former ′ is the Eulerian pertur- equation, ρE is the Eulerian density, v is the Eulerian velocity, VE bation of the potential (perturbation assembled of the tide-raising potential and the resulting additional tidal potential of the deformed body), and r is a perturbed position in the body frame. In the latter equation, Wl and Ul are the degree-l components of the tide-raising and additional tidal potentials, G is the Newton gravity constant, R is the radius of the planet, and dS is an element of the undeformed surface of the sphere. The transition from the former formula to the latter requires the use of the boundary conditions on the free surface. At that point, integration is already carried out within the Lagrangian description (over an undeformed surface), but the boundary conditions are nonetheless imposed on the Eulerian potential and its gradient. (The boundary conditions are much simpler in the Eulerian form.) This mixed treatment requires attention, and its employment by the early authors (Zschau 1978, Platzman 1984) contained inaccuracies. However none of those turned out to be critical, and the above expression for the average power hPi is correct for small deformations. In Section 6 we explore the standard way of casting the above integral into a spectral sum over the tidal Fourier modes ω . It is commonly assumed that the result should read as -- 3 -- in Platzman (1984): hPi = 1 4πGR Xω (2l + 1) ω 2 W 2 l (ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) . Here kl(ω) and ǫl(ω) are the Love number and phase lag corresponding to the Fourier mode ω = ωlmpq , with lmpq being the four integers wherewith the Fourier modes are numbered in the Darwin-Kaula theory of tides (see Efroimsky & Makarov 2013 and references therein). However, an accurate investigation demonstrates that the spectral sum differs from the above. The difference originates for two reasons. One is the degeneracy, i.e., the fact that several different Fourier modes ωlmpq share a numerical value ω , so the structure of the above sum is more complex. 1 The second reason is that the modes can be of either sign, not necessarily positive. So the resulting power will contain seemingly strange terms with Wl(ω) Wl(−ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) . These difficulties were noticed and analysed by Peale and Cassen (1978) who derived the dissipation rate in a synchronously rotating body. 2 One of our goals is to generalise their result to an arbitrary spin state. The calculation of the power production, developed by Peale & Cassen (1978), implies averaging not only over the tidal period but also over the apsidal period. This can be observed from the formulae (20 - 21) in their work. In our paper, however, we consider two separate cases: those with and without apsidal precession. In the first case, the period of the apsidal precession is shorter than the typical time of relaxation in the mantle (which may be identified with the Maxwell time). The argument of the pericentre of the perturber, ω∗ , cannot be treated as constant, wherefore the formula for the mean power should be averaged not only over the tidal period, but also over the period of the pericentre motion. (We assume 1 When calculating Wl , one has first to group together and sum all the terms corresponding to a particular value of ω . Each such sum should be squared and averaged, and only after that should the In the original expression for the average final summation over the distinct values of ω be carried out. power, l (ω) term should be replaced with the squared sum of all the harmonics of W that correspond to a particular value of ω . l (ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) , the W 2 (4πGR)−1 Pω(2l + 1) ω 2 W 2 2 In the expression for hPi , an input from each value of ωlmpq must be non-negative. This can be observed from the fact that the mode ω = ωlmpq and the corresponding phase lag ǫl(ω) ≡ ω ∆tl(ω) are always of the same sign (the time lag ∆tl(ω) being positive definite due to causality). Thus the product ω ǫl(ω) = ωlmpq ǫl(ωlmpq) in the spectral sum can always be rewritten as ωlmpq/Qlmpq , with the tidal quality factor being defined via 1/Qlmpq = sin ǫl(ωlmpq) . In their spectral sum, Peale & Cassen (1978, eqn 31) have just ωlmpq/Qlmpq , and not ωlmpq/Qlmpq . The reasons for this is that they are employing a nonstandard convention 1/Qlmpq = sin ǫl(ωlmpq) wherein the inverse quality factors incorporate the signs of the lags and, thus, are not positive definite. -- 4 -- this motion steady.) In the second case, the evolution of the line of apsides is slow, with its period being longer than the Maxwell time. The argument of the pericentre should be regarded as a constant. Accordingly, in the latter case the tidal dissipation formula is more complicated, because it includes explicit dependence of Fourier terms on the argument of pericentre. In a subsequent work, Makarov & Efroimsky (2014), we apply our results in three case studies: Io, Mercury, and Kepler-10 b. In that paper we, among other things, hypothesise that the tidal heating rate at spin-orbit resonances is greatly influenced by libration and, therefore, by the triaxiality of the tidally perturbed body. 2. The Darwin-Kaula formalism in brief Describing of linear bodily tides consists of two steps. First, it is necessary to Fourier- expand both the tide-raising potential and the induced additional potential of the tidally perturbed body. Second, it is necessary to link each Fourier component of the additional tidal potential to an appropriate Fourier component of the tide-raising potential. This means: establishing the phase lag and the ratio of magnitudes called the dynamical Love number. Due to interplay of rheology and self-gravitation, the phase lags and Love numbers have nontrivial frequency dependencies. Things are complicated even further because different mechanisms of friction become leading over different frequency bands, wherefore the tidal response cannot be described by one simple dissipation model (Efroimsky 2012 a,b). 2.1. Generalities The development of the mathematical theory of bodily tides was started by Darwin (1879) who derived a partial sum of the Fourier expansion of the additional potential of a tidally perturbed sphere. A decisive contribution into this theory was offered almost a century later by Kaula (1964) who wrote down a complete series. In a previous paper (Efroimsky & Makarov 2013), we provided a detailed presentation of the Darwin-Kaula expansion and explained how tidal friction and lagging are built into it. We compared the Darwin-Kaula theory with the one by MacDonald (1964) and demonstrated that the former theory is superior to the latter, because it can, in principle, be combined with an arbitrary rheology. Referring the reader to the afore-cited literature for details, we present several central formulae that will be necessary. An external body of mass M ∗ , located in r ∗ = (r∗, λ∗, φ∗) , generates the following disturbing potential in a point R = (R, φ, λ) on the surface of a sphere of radius R < r∗ : -- 5 -- W (R , r ∗) = Wl (R , r ∗) = − G M ∗ r ∗ ∞ Xl =2 l ∞ Xl =2 (cid:18) R r ∗ (cid:19) Pl(cos γ) = G M ∗ r ∗ − l ∞ Xl =2 (cid:18) R r ∗(cid:19) (l − m)! (l + m)! l Xm=0 (2 − δ0m)Plm(sin φ)Plm(sin φ∗) cos m(λ − λ∗) . (1) Here G denotes Newton's gravity constant, φ is the latitude reckoned from the spherical body's equator, λ is the longitude measured from a fixed meridian, and γ is the angular separation between the vectors r ∗ and R pointing from the perturbed body's centre. The definitions of the Legendre polynomials Pl(cos γ) and the associated Legendre polynomials Plm(sin φ) are given in Appendix A. While in the above formula the location of the perturber on its trajectory is expressed through the spherical coordinates r ∗ = (r∗, λ∗, φ∗) , a trigonometric transformation (de- veloped by Kaula 1961) enables one to switch to the perturber's orbital elements r ∗ = ( a∗, e∗, i ∗, Ω∗, ω∗, M∗ ) . In terms thereof, the disturbing potential is expressed as W (R , r ∗) = Xlmpq Xl =2 (cid:18) R a∗ (cid:19) Wlmpq = − (l − m)! (l + m)! Xm=0 ( 2 l l G M ∗ ∞ a∗ − δ0m ) Pl m(sin φ) Fl mp(i ∗) l Xp=0 ∞ Xq= − ∞ sin (cid:27) Gl pq(e∗)(cid:26) cos l − m even l − m odd (cid:0)v∗ l mpq − m(λ + θ∗)(cid:1) , (2) where θ∗ is the rotation angle of the tidally perturbed body, 3 while Flmp(i ∗) and Glpq(e∗) are the inclination functions and the eccentricity polynomials, respectively. The auxiliary linear combinations v∗ lmpq are defined by v∗ lmpq ≡ (l − 2p) ω∗ + (l − 2p + q)M∗ + m Ω∗ . (3) Conventionally, the letters denoting the elements of the perturber are accompanied with asterisks: a∗, e∗, i ∗, Ω∗, ω∗, M∗ . Following Kaula (1964), the sidereal angle also acquires an asterisk, when it appears in a combination v∗ lmpq − m θ∗ with the perturber's elements. 3 When the equinoctial precession may be neglected, θ∗ may be regarded as the sidereal angle. -- 6 -- The angle θ , however, does not acquire an asterisk, when it appears in a linear combi- nation vlmpq − m θ with the orbital elements of a test body subject to the additional tidal potential of the perturbed body. This strange nomenclature introduced by Kaula (1964) -- two different notations for one angle -- turns out to be helpful and convenient in the calcu- lation of the back-reaction experienced by the perturber. For comprehensive explanation of this obscure point, see Section 5 in Efroimsky & Makarov (2013). Over timescales shorter than the apsidal-motion period, the expression in round brackets in the formula (2) can be linearised as v∗ lmpq − m(λ + θ∗) = ωlmpq (t − t0) − m λ + v∗ lmpq(t0) − m θ∗(t0) , where the following quantities act as the Fourier tidal modes: (cid:5) (cid:5) ωlmpq ≡ v∗ lmpq − m θ∗ = (l − 2p) ω∗ + (l − 2p + q) M ∗ + m ( Ω∗ − θ∗) , (4) (5) M ∗ being the perturber's "anomalistic" mean motion (see Section 2.3 below), and t0 being the time of pericentre passage. (As ever, we set M ∗ = 0 in the pericentre.) The modes ωlmpq can assume either sign, but the physical forcing frequencies are positive definite: χlmpq = ωlmpq . (6) 2.2. Simplifying the notation: less asterisks In the preceding subsection, we obeyed the convention by Kaula (1964) and marked with asterisk the orbital elements of the tide-raising body. Kaula introduced this notation, because within his model he also considered another exterior body that was disturbed by the tides generated on the planet by the tide-raising body. This exterior body's elements were denoted by the same letters, but without an asterisk. When the two outer bodies coincide, the asterisks may be dropped, except on two occasions. The first is writing the masses -- while the mass of the planet is denoted with M , the mass of the perturber (the star) will be written as M ∗ . The other occasion requires writing the additional tidal potential of the perturbed body -- the potential will have a value U(r, r ∗) in a point r , provided the perturber (the star) is located in an exterior point r ∗ (both vectors being planetocentric). The planet's rotation rate θ , as well as the orbital elements of the star as seen from the planet, will hereafter be written without asterisks. The most important notations employed in this paper are connected in Table 1. -- 7 -- 2.3. Difficulties At this point, a word of warning is necessary. Deriving the equation (5), we differentiated the expression (3), which gave us the terms with ω and Ω . Including these terms in the equation (5) acknowledges the fact that the perturber's trajectory is disturbed, not Keplerian. The disturbance may come solely from tides, as in Kaula (1964, eqn 38), or from both tides and other sources. One way or another, the perturber's mean anomaly n(t) dt , where t0 M is no longer equal to n t , but is now given by M = M0 + R t n(t) ≡ pG (M + M ∗) a−3(t) . Accordingly, the expression for the modes becomes: ωlmpq ≡ (cid:5)vlmpq − m θ = (l − 2p) ( ω + M0) + q M0 + (l − 2p + q) n + m ( Ω − θ) . (cid:5) (7) It is, of course, tempting to assume that (cid:5) M0 ≪ n , thus accepting the approximation (cid:5) (cid:5) M = M0 + n ≈ n , (8) as Kaula (1964) did in his equations (46 - 47). Within his theory, however, this approximation could not be used. 4 This is explained in Appendix B where we consider two examples. One is the case where perturbation of an orbit of a moon is mainly due to the tides the moon M0 are of the same order but of opposite creates in the planet. In that situation, signs, so they largely compensate one another. This suggests a simultaneous neglect of both rates. The second example is when the dominant perturbation of the orbit comes from the ω and M0 turn out to be of the same order and of oblateness of the primary. In this case, the same sign -- so keeping one of these terms requires keeping the other. ω and Whether one or both of these rates should be included depends on a particular setting, and each practical case must be examined separately. In general, both rates should be kept. (cid:5) While keeping (cid:5)ω complicates the formalism, the emergence of treatment even further. To sidestep this issue, we shall define the mean motion via M0 complicates the n ≡ M . (9) This, the so-called anomalistic mean motion differs from pG(M + M ∗) a−3(t) . We shall derive the heat-production formulae for two different settings -- with a fixed pericentre ω and with ω moving uniformly. 4 In his books, Kaula (1966, 1968) corrected this oversight. There, he kept the notation n for the mean motion defined as in the Kepler law, and never confused it with (cid:5) M . -- 8 -- 2.4. Lagging For a static tide, the incremental tidal potential of the perturbed body mimics the is now equipped with a mitigating multiplier is an l−degree Love number. With the star located in r ∗ , the perturbation (2), except that each term Wl kl (R/r) l+1 , where kl additional potential in a point r will read as U(r , r ∗) = Ul (r) = ∞ Xl =2 ∞ Xl =2 kl (cid:18) R r (cid:19)l +1 Wl (R , r ∗) . (10) For time-dependent tides, this expression acquires an extra amendment: the reaction must lag, compared to the action. Naively, this would imply taking each Wl at an earlier instant of time. However, in reality lagging depends on frequency; so each Wl must be first expanded into a Fourier series over tidal modes, whereafter each term of the series should be delayed separately. The magnitude of the tidal reaction is frequency dependent too; so each term of the Fourier series will be multiplied by a dynamical Love number of its own. Symbolically, this may be written in a manner similar to the static expression: U(r , r ∗) = Ul (r , r ∗) = ∞ Xl =2 ∞ Xl=2 (cid:18) R r (cid:19)l +1 kl Wl (R , r ∗) . (11) The hat above kl means that this is not a multiplier but a linear operator that mitigates and delays each Fourier mode of Wl differently: U(r , r ∗) = − G M ∗ a l+1 ∞ Xl =2 (cid:18) R r (cid:19) l (cid:18) R a (cid:19) l Xm=0 (l − m)! (l + m)! ( 2 − δ0m ) Plm(sin φ) Flmp(i) l Xp=0 ∞ Xq= − ∞ sin (cid:27) Glpq(e) kl(ωlmpq) (cid:26) cos l − m even l − m odd ( vlmpq − m (λ + θ) − ǫl ) , (12) where the Love numbers kl(ωlmpq) and the phase lags ǫl(ωlmpq) are functions of the Fourier modes. The lags emerge as the products ǫl(ωlmpq ) = ωlmpq ∆tl(ωlmpq) , (13a) where ∆tl(ωlmpq ) is the time delay at the mode ωlmpq . In reality, the time delays are functions not of the Fourier modes (which can assume either sign), but of the actual physical forcing frequencies χlmpq = ωlmpq which are positive definite. Thus it is more accurate to write the delays not as ∆tl(ωlmpq ) but as ∆tl(χlmpq ) . Accordingly, the phase lags become ǫl(ωlmpq) = ωlmpq ∆tl(χlmpq ) . (13b) -- 9 -- The time delays are positive definite due to causality, so the sign of the phase lag always coincides with that of the corresponding Fourier mode. Thus we finally have: ǫl(ωlmpq) = ωlmpq Sgn (ωlmpq) ∆tl(χlmpq ) = χlmpq Sgn (ωlmpq ) ∆tl(χlmpq ) , (13c) where χlmpq ≡ ωlmpq are the positive definite forcing frequencies. The dynamical Love number kl(ωlmpq) and the phase lag ǫl(ωlmpq) are the absolute value and the negative phase of the complex Love number ¯kl(ωlmpq ) whose functional de- pendence upon the Fourier mode is solely determined by l , provided the body is spherical. 5 2.5. Physics behind the Love numbers and phase lags As we saw above, to obtain the decomposition (12) from the Fourier series (2), each lmpq term of the latter had to be endowed with its own mitigating factor kl = kl(ωlmpq) and phase lag ǫl = ǫl(ωlmpq) . In the past, some authors enquired whether this mitigate-and- lag method was general enough to describe tides. It is, as long as the tides are linear. This is explained in Appendix C below. The expression (12) for the additional tidal potential contains both sines and cosines of the phase lags, and so does the ensuing expression for the surface elevation. However, the resulting expression for the tidal dissipation rate turns out to contain only the combination kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) which is the negative imaginary part of the complex Love number: kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) = ¯kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) = − Im(cid:2)¯kl(ω)(cid:3) , where ω = ωlmpq This quantity is often denoted as kl/Q , although it would be more reasonable to employ the notation kl/Ql , with the tidal quality factors defined through 1/Ql ≡ sinǫl . (14) . A dynamical Love number kl(ωlmpq ) is an even function of the tidal mode ωlmpq , while a phase lag ǫl(ωlmpq ) is odd, as can be observed from the equation (13b). Thus the expression for the product kl sin ǫl as a function of the physical frequency χ = χlmpq ≡ ωlmpq is: kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) = kl(χ) sin ǫl(χ) Sgn (ω) , (15) where ǫl(χ) is non-negative, because non-negative is the physical frequency χ . 5 For oblate celestial bodies, the functional form of the complex ¯kl (ωlmpq ) is also determined by the order m . In that situation, the right notation for the complex Love number is: ¯klm (ωlmpq ) . Its absolute value and negative phase will then be denoted with klm (ωlmpq ) and ǫlm(ωlmpq ) . -- 10 -- The frequency dependence of kl/Ql = kl(χ) sin ǫl(χ) is defined by two major physical circumstances: self-gravitation of the planet and the rheology of its mantle. A rheological law is expressed by a constitutive equation, i.e., by an equation interconnecting the strain and the stress. A particular form of this equation is determined by the friction mechanisms present in the considered medium. A realistic rheological law should contain contributions from elasticity, viscosity, and inelastic processes (mainly, dislocation unjamming). Self- gravitation suppresses the tidal bulge. At low frequencies this effectively adds to the mantle's rigidity, whereas at higher frequencies the interplay of rheology and gravity is more complex (Efroimsky 2012 b, Figure 2). The calculation of the frequency dependence kl(χ) sin ǫl(χ) for a homogeneous body of a known size, mass and rheology is presented in detail in Efroimsky (2012a,b). See also the Appendix to Makarov & Efroimsky (2014). While quadrupole ( l = 2 ) terms are sufficient in most problems, exceptions are known. For the orbital evolution of Phobos, the l = 3 and, possibly, even l = 4 terms of the Martian tidal potential may be of relevance (Bills et al. 2005). Studying close binary asteroids, Taylor & Margot (2010) took into account the Love numbers up to l = 6 . The question of how rapidly l > 2 terms fall off with the increase of the degree l is also interesting. Most authors only rely on the geometric factor (R/a)2l+1 to answer this question. As was explained in Efroimsky (2012 b), the l-dependence of kl(ωlmpq) sin ǫ(ωlmpq) , too, comes into play and changes the result considerably. 3. The Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions What we hope ever to do with ease, we must learn first to do with diligence. Samuel Johnson 3.1. Notations and definitions To compare the varying shape of a deformable body against some benchmark configu- ration, we use X to denote the initial position occupied by a particle at t = 0 . At another time t , the particle finds itself in a new place x = f (X, t) , -- 11 -- where the function f (X, t) is a trajectory, i.e., a solution to the equation of motion, with the initial condition x = X set at t = 0 . The current values of all physical and kinematic properties of the medium can be ex- pressed as functions of the instantaneous coordinates x of a point where these properties are being measured at the present moment t . When referred to the present time and posi- tion, such properties are named Eulerian and are equipped with a subscript E ; for example: qE (x, t) . The Eulerian description is fit to answer the question "where" and therefore is convenient in fluid dynamics where the displacement x − X can become arbitrarily large and the initial position X is soon forgotten. While x denotes a place in space, the initial condition X acts as the "number" of a particle presently residing at the place x . Although located now at x , the particle originally came from X and will carry the label X forever. Knowing the trajectories of all particles, we can express the properties as functions of the time t and the initial conditions X . To that end, we employ the change of variables x = f (X, t) . Expressed through the initial conditions, a property q will be termed as Lagrangian and equipped with the subscript L : or, in more detail: qL(X, t) ≡ qE (x , t) qL(X, t) ≡ qE ( f (X , t) , t ) . (16a) (16b) So qL has the same value as qE , but has a different functional form, as it is now understood as a function of the initial conditions (the particles' 'numbers') X , and not of the present- time coordinates x . Relating the quantities to the initial positions X , the Lagrangian description tells us "which particle" and is thus practical in description of deformable solids. In anticipation of perturbative treatment, we regard the trajectory x = f (X, t) as fiducial and equip the appropriate functional dependencies with a superscript 0 : which is: q0 L(X, t) ≡ q0 E (x , t) q0 L(X, t) ≡ q0 E ( f (X, t) , t ) . (17a) (17b) -- 12 -- 3.2. Perturbative approach Under disturbance, two changes will take place in a point r at a time t : 1. Properties will now assume different values in this point at this time. So we substitute the unperturbed Eulerian dependencies q0 E (r , t) with qE (r , t) = q0 E (r , t) + q ′ E (r , t) . (18) This equality, in fact, serves as a definition of the variation q ′ E (r, t) : the variation is a change in the functional dependence of a physical property upon the present position r 2. A different particle will now appear in the point r at the time t . It will not be the same particle as the one expected there at the time t in the absence of perturbation. Accordingly, a particle, which starts in X at t , not in the point x = f (X, t) but in some other location displaced by u : t = 0 , will show up, at the time r = x + u = f (X, t) + u(X, t) . (19) Both OF these changes, 1 and 2, will affect the Lagrangian dependencies of the properties upon the initial conditions, so the dependency of each property will acquire a variation q ′ L(X, t) : qL(X, t) = q0 L(X, t) + q ′ L(X, t) . (20) In Appendix D, we provide a self-sufficient introduction into the perturbative treatment of a deformable body, both in the Eulerian and Lagrangian languages. There we derive a relation between the perturbations of the Lagrangian and Eulerian quantities: q ′ L(X, t) = q ′ E ( f (X, t) , t ) + u(X, t) ∇x qE + O(u2) , with the gradient in the second term acting on the unperturbed history: 6 ∇x qE ≡ ∇x qE (x, t) , where x = f (X, t) . (21) (22) In the formula (21), the first term on the right-hand side, E (x, t) , accounts for the change of the final spatial distribution of properties. The other two terms show up because perturbation alters the mapping from X to the present position. q ′ 6 To derive (21), we expanded qE (r, t) = qE (x+u, t) into the Taylor series near the unperturbed qE (x, t). -- 13 -- 3.3. Summary of linearised formulae for the density of a periodically deformed solid We need several formulae for density perturbations, which are obtained in Appendix D. > In the Eulerian description: ρE (r, t) = ρ 0 E (r) + ρE ′(r, t) , ρE ′ + ∇r · (ρ 0 E u) = 0 , (23) (24) Formula (23) renders the interrelation between the functions of the same variable. The unperturbed density ρ 0 E appears here as a function of the perturbed present positions r , not of the unperturbed reference positions x . This can be traced through the derivation (D21 - D24). There, the unperturbed density initially shows up as a function of x = r − u . It then ends up as a function of r , after the Taylor expansion around r over powers of u is performed. Accordingly, the symbol ∇r denotes differentiation with respect to the perturbed po- sition r upon which ρ 0 E is set to depend in the above equations. Also remember that in u(x, t) = u(r, t) + O(u2) we can neglect O(u2) , in the linear approximation. Thus the Lagrangian and Eulerian values of the displacement coincide in the first order. Specifically, in the equation (24), our u can be treated as a function of r . So all entities in that equation are functions of the same variable, the perturbed location. > In the Lagrangian description: ρL(X, t) = ρ 0 E (X) + ρL ′(X, t) , ρL ′ + ρ 0 E ∇X · u = 0 . (25) (26) Recall that this is an interrelation between functions of the same variable. This time, it is the initial position X . Had we altered the notation from X to r , nothing would have changed (except that we would write ∇r instead of ∇X ) -- it would still be the same relation between three functions of the same argument. > Relation between the increments ρL ′ and ρE ′ : -- 14 -- This relation originates from the general formula (21). In our case the reference trajectory x = f (X, t) stays identical to the initial position X , so we obtain: ρL ′(x, t) = ρE ′(x, t) + u(x, t) · ∇x ρ 0 E (x, t) . (27) Once again, we are dealing with a relation between several functions taken all at one and the same point. Here the point is denoted with x . Had we denoted it with r , the only change would be a switch from ∇x to ∇r , no matter what meaning we instill into these x and r . E = 0 ; so the forms (24) and (26) of the For an initially homogeneous body, ∇ρ 0 linearised conservation law coincide and can both be conveniently written as ρ 0 ∇r · v + ∂ρ ∂t = 0 , where ρ 0 ≡ ρ 0 E and the velocity is v = ∂u ∂t . (28) (29) 3.4. Potentials and their increments In each point, the density ρ and potential V comprise a mean value and a perturbation: density: ρ = ρ 0 + ρ ′ , potential: V = V 0 + V ′ = V 0 + ( W + U ) , (30a) (30b) where V 0 is the constant-in-time spherically symmetrical potential of an undeformed body, while V ′ denotes the potential's perturbation. The perturbation consists of the external tide-raising potential W and the resulting additional potential U of the perturbed body: V ′ = W + U . (31) The potentials and densities will be endowed with a subscript " L " or " E " pointing at the Lagrangian or Eulerian descriptions, accordingly. Owing to the general expression (21), we have: VE ′(r, t) = VL ′(x, t) − u · ∇x V 0 E , (32) the same being valid for ρ , see the equation (27). For unperturbed properties, however, subscripts may be dropped without causing any confusion: ρ 0 ≡ ρ 0 E . V 0 ≡ V 0 (33) , E -- 15 -- 3.5. The Poisson equation in the Eulerian description In both the perturbed and unperturbed settings, the density and potential are always linked through the Poisson equation: ∇ 2 r VE = − 4 π G ρE , r V 0 ∇ 2 E = − 4 π G ρ 0 E , while the perturbing potential W obeys the Laplace equation outside the perturber: ∇ 2 r WE = 0 . (34a) (34b) (34c) Subtraction of (34b) from (34a) results in a Poisson equation for the density perturbation: The Poisson equation in the Lagrangian description is presented in Appendix D. ∇ 2 r VE ′ = − 4 π G ρE ′ (35) 4. The power produced by the tidal force 4.1. In the Eulerian description The power P exerted on the perturbed body is an integral, over its volume, of the rate of working by tidal forces on displacements. In the Eulerian language, the power reads as P = Z ρE v · ∇r VE ′ d3r , (36) the integration being performed over an instantaneous, deformed volume. Together with ρE v · ∇r VE the mass-conservation law ′ = ∇r · ( ρE v VE ′ ) − VE ′ ∇r · ( ρE v ) , ∇r · ( ρE v ) + ∂ρE ∂t = 0 simplifies the expression under the integral to the following form: ρE v · ∇r VE ′ = ∇r · ( ρE v VE ′ ) + VE ′ ′ ∂ρE ∂t . (37) (38) (39a) -- 16 -- Further employment of the Poisson equation in the Eulerian form, (35), gives us ρE v · ∇r VE ′ = ∇r · ( ρE v VE ′ ) − 1 4 π G VE ′ ∂ ∂t ∇2 r VE ′ . So the power becomes P = Z ∇r · ( ρE v VE ′ ) d3r + Z VE ′ ′ ∂ρE ∂t d3r = ZΣt ρE VE ′ v · dSt − 1 4 π G Z VE ′ ∂ ∂t ∇2 r VE ′ d3r , (39b) (40a) (40b) where dSt ≡ nt dΣt , with nt and dΣt being a unit normal to the deformed surface and an element of area on that surface, both taken at the time t . Correct to the first order in the displacement u , these are related to their unperturbed analogues via nt = ( 1 − ∇Σ ⊗ u ) n and where the surface gradient is defined as dΣt = (cid:0) 1 + ∇Σ · u(cid:1) dΣ , ∇Σ ≡ ∇x − n ∂n , (41) (42) so ∇Σ ⊗ u is a three-dimensional second-rank tensor (Dahlen & Tromp 1998). Altogether, dSt ≡ nt dΣt = (cid:0) 1 + ∇Σ · u(cid:1) n dΣ − (∇Σ ⊗ u) n dΣ = (cid:0) 1 + ∇Σ · u(cid:1) dS − (∇Σ ⊗ u) dS , (43a) with dS ≡ ndΣ pertaining to the unperturbed surface. In a shorter form, the above reads as (43b) dSt = J dS , where the three-dimensional second-rank tensor J ≡ ( 1 + ∇Σ · u ) I − ∇Σ ⊗ u (44) is, loosely speaking, playing the role of a Jacobian for elements of area. This is fully analogous to the formula d3r = J d3x = (1 + ∇x · u) d3x = [1 + ∇r · u + O(u2) ] d3x (45) linking the deformed volume d3r to the undeformed volume d3x . (See Appendix D.4.1.) -- 17 -- 4.2. In the Lagrangian description Applied to the density, the general formula (16) renders: ρL(X, t) ≡ ρE (r, t) . (46) This, together with the formula (32) for the potential perturbation, enables us to express the power in the Lagrangian description: P = Z ρL v · ∇x VL ′ d3x − Z ρL v · ∇x ( u · ∇x V 0 ) d3x , (47) the integral now being taken over the undeformed body. Be mindful that d3r ∇r = d3x∇x , so no Jacobian shows up on the right-hand side. The velocity and displacement being in quadrature, the second term should be dropped after time averaging (denoted with angular brackets): hPi = Z ρL v · ∇x VL ′ d3x , (48a) For a periodically deformed solid, we set the equilibrium state to play the role of the unper- turbed configuration, for which reason 7 ρL(X , t) J = ρ 0 E (x) . Insertion of this equality into the expression (48a) gives us: hPi = Z ρ 0 v · ∇x VL ′ J −1 d3x . (48b) The dot-product can be easily rearranged via the formulae analogous to (37 - 39). Due to ρ 0 v · ∇x VL ′ = ∇x · ( ρ 0 v VL ′ ) − VL ′ ∇x · ( v ρ 0 ) and ρ 0 ∇x · v + ∂ρ ∂t = 0 , (49) (50) 7 The mass is conserved along both trajectories, perturbed and unperturbed. So both ρE (r, t) d3r and E (X) d3X , and therefore to one another: ρE (r, t) d3r = E (X) , where J ≡ d3r/d3x . In combination with (46), this yields: ρ 0 E (x, t) d3x must be equal to the initial mass ρ 0 ρ 0 E (x, t) d3x . Thence, ρE (r , t) J = ρ 0 ρL (X , t) J = ρ 0 E (x , t) . When the unperturbed configuration is the equilibrium state, x = f (X, t) coincides with X at all times. So ρ 0 E (x) . See Appendix D.4.1 for a detailed discussion. E (x, t) bears no dependence on time, and the above equality becomes simply ρL (X , t) J = ρ 0 -- 18 -- the expression under the integral becomes ρ 0 v · ∇x VL ′ = ∇x · ( ρ 0 v VL ′ ) + VL ′ ′ ∂ρL ∂t , (51) provided we set ∇x ρ 0 = 0 , i.e., provided we assume that the unperturbed body is homogeneous. 8 Then the time-averaged power, for an initially homogeneous body, acquires the form of hPi = Z ∇x · ( ρ 0 v VL ′ ) d3x + Z VL ′ ′ ∂ρL ∂t d3x , (52) where we approximated the Jacobian with unity, thus neglecting higher-order terms. 5. Tidal dissipation rate in a homogeneous sphere Although the Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions are equivalent, the boundary con- ditions look simpler in the Eulerian picture. On the other hand, for periodic deformations, practical calculations are easier carried out in the Lagrangian description, as it implies inte- grations over the unperturbed volume and surface corresponding to the equilibrium shape. It is, unfortunately, not unusual for the authors to refrain from pointing out which description is employed, leaving this to the discernment of the readers. The easiest way to trace an author's choice is to look at the way they write the expression for the power and the Poisson equation. The often-cited authors Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984) started in the Eulerian language and then switched to the Lagrangian description. This can be seen from the fact that the time-average power was eventually written by both of them as an integral over the undeformed body. Both works contained some mathematical omissions which, fortunately, did not influence the final form of the integral. Below we present these authors' method in a more mathematically complete manner. While our expression for the power, written as an integral over the unperturbed surface, will coincide with the integrals derived by the said authors, our final result (the power written as a spectral sum over the Fourier modes) will differ. In one important detail, our result also differs from that by Peale & Cassen (1978). 8 No such assumption was required to obtain the Eulerian analogue (38) of the Lagrangian formula (50). -- 19 -- 5.1. A mixed, Eulerian-Lagrangian treatment Similar to Zschau (1978, eqn. 2), we begin with the formula (36) for the power in the Eulerian variables. The next natural step is (40), whereafter integration by parts renders: P =Z ρE VE ′ v · dSt − 1 4πG Z d3r ∇r ·(cid:18)VE ′ ′ ∂∇r VE ∂t (cid:19) + 1 4πG Z d3r ′ ∂∇r VE ∂t ′ · ∇r VE (53a) ′ 1 ∂t ′ ∂∇r VE =Z ρL VE 4πG Z VE · ( J dS ) + ′ v · ( J dS ) − ′ · ∇r VE En route from the former expression to the latter, we switch from dSt and d3r to J dS and J d3x , respectively. Thereby we switch from integration over a deformed body to that over the undeformed one. So ρE becomes ρL , see the equation (46). A similar switch from ′ for some VE time, for it will be easier to impose the boundary conditions on the Eulerian potential. ′ can be performed using the equation (32), but we prefer to stick to VE ∂tZ (J d3x) ∇r VE ′ to VL 8πG 1 ∂ ′ . (53b) In a leading-order calculation, both the Jacobian and its tensorial analogue may be set unity: J ≈ I and J ≈ 1 , as evident from the formulae (44) and (45). In the same order, we can substitute ∇r with ∇x . In addition, as was explained in Footnote 7, we can substitute ρL = ρ 0/J with ρ 0 , and can treat the latter as time-independent. Thus the time average of the power becomes: hPi = Z (cid:10) ρ 0 VE ′ v(cid:11) · dS − = − 1 4πG Z (cid:28) VE ′ ∂ ∂t (cid:0)∇x VE ′ 1 ∂t 4πG Z (cid:28) VE ′ ∂ ∇xVE (cid:29) · dS ′ − 4 π G ρ 0 u(cid:1)(cid:29) · dS . (54a) (54b) with the volume integral dropped. 9 The potential VE interior potential, so the above formula should, rigorously speaking, have been written as in the above developments was the ′ hPi = − 1 4πG Z (cid:28) VE ′ (interior) ∂ ∂t (cid:18)∇x VE (interior) ′ − 4 π G ρ 0 u(cid:19)(cid:29) · dS . (54c) 9 As previously agreed, in our approximation the Jacobian is set unity. The potential variation VE ′ is a ′ . After time averaging of (53b), the cross terms in ′ will vanish, while the products of harmonics of the same frequency will render sum of sinusoidal harmonics, and so is its gradient ∇x VE the product ∇x VE constants. ′ · ∇x VE -- 20 -- The expression (54c) is somewhat formal. On the one hand, it contains integration over an undeformed surface, an operation appropriate to the Lagrangian description. On the other hand, the quantity under the integral is Eulerian, i.e., is a function of the perturbed positions. Thus, to employ the expression (54c) in practical calculations, one would first have to express the integrated average product (cid:28) VE (interior) ∂ ′ function of the unperturbed positions, i.e., of the coordinates on the undeformed surface. Simply speaking, one would have to switch from a Eulerian function under the integral to a Lagrangian function, using the formula (32). The reason for our procrastination with this step is the convenience of the Eulerian description for imposing boundary conditions. (interior) ′ ∂t (cid:18)∇x VE − 4 π G ρ 0 u(cid:19)(cid:29) as a 5.2. Comparing the intermediate result (54c) with analogous formulae from Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984) Our expression (54c) is equivalent to the formula (12) in Zschau (1978). The sole differ- ence is how we justify the substitution of the Lagrangian density ρL with the unperturbed ρ 0 . Whereas we approximated the Jacobian with 1 + O(u) , Zschau (1978, eqn. 10) em- ployed a clever trick that did not rely on the smallness of disturbance. In our notation, the trick looks like this: if in the first term of our expression (54a) we also keep the first-order ′ will always be perturbation ρL zero, provided all three oscillate at the same frequency. While elegant, Zschau's argument works only for a perturbation at one frequency, not for a spectrum of frequencies. ′ of the density, the time average of the product ρL ′ v VE The treatment by Platzman (1984) contains more inaccuracies. The author's formula (2) looks like our equation (48b), with the actual density substituted from the beginning by its unperturbed value ρ 0 . Such a start indicates the use of the Lagrangian description. This however comes into contradiction with the way the author writes down the conservation law. Platzman's form of that law is equivalent to our equation (24), i.e., is written in the Eulerian language. The following Poisson equation, too, is Eulerian. That the author eventually arrives at the right integral expression (equation 5 in Ibid.) is more due to luck than to accuracy. In the subsequent derivation, the author's formulae (7) and (10) are incorrect, because the fact that the Fourier modes in the Darwin-Kaula theory can be of either sign is neglected. We shall address this point at the end of Section 5.4. -- 21 -- 5.3. Employment of the boundary conditions The Eulerian boundary conditions mimic those from electrostatics (see Appendix E): (interior) ′ VE = VE ′ (exterior) (55) and (cid:20) ∂ ∂ n VE ′ − 4 π G ρ 0 u (cid:21) (exterior) = (cid:20) ∂ ∂ n VE ′ − 4 π G ρ 0 u (cid:21) (interior) . (56) Insertion thereof into the equation (54c) makes the power look hPi = − 1 4πG Z (cid:28) VE ′ (exterior) ∂ ∂t ∇x VE ′ (exterior) (cid:29) · dS . (57) It is now high time to write the expression under the integral (57) as a function of the coordinates on the unperturbed surface, the one over which we integrate. The formula (32) ′ − u · ∇x V0 . As u is zero outside the body, we prescribes us to substitute VE get 10 ′ with VL hPi = − 1 4πG Z (cid:28) VL ′ (exterior) ∂ ∂t ∇x VL ′ (exterior) (cid:29) · dS , (58) To analyse the behaviour of V ′ outside the perturbed body, recall that its two components, U and W , scale differently with the planetocentric radius. As can be seen from (1), the degree-l Legendre component of the perturbing potential changes as 11 Wl ∝ r l . According to (11), the degree-l component of the tidal potential obeys Ul ∝ r−(l+1) . All in all, the l−degree part of the exterior V ′ assumes the form of Wl(R) + (cid:16) r R(cid:17) Xl=2 "(cid:16) r R(cid:17) Ul(R)# , (exterior) (59) −(l+1) = ′ VL ∞ l 10 For the first multiplier under the integral (57), we simply substitute VE ′ (exterior) with VL ′ (exterior) , omitting the term [− u · ∇x V0 ] The case of the second multiplier, ∂ ∂t ∇x VE (exterior) (exterior) because u is zero outside the body. (exterior) ′ , is less obvious. Employment of the formula (32) ∂t (cid:2)∇x VL furnishes us ∂ . The vanishing of u on the exterior side of the boundary does not imply the vanishing of its gradient there. On the contrary, ∇x · (u V 0) performs a finite step -- but ′ remains continuous. To sidestep these so also does the gradient of VL intricacies, we can expand the volume of integration slightly outward from the actual volume of the planet (Platzman 1984, p. 74). ′ − ∇x · (u V 0)(cid:3) ′ , so that altogether the gradient VE 11 Do not be misled by the planetocentric distance in (1) being denoted with R . There we needed the value of W on the surface, whereas here we need to know W at an arbitrary planetocentric distance. -- 22 -- while the normal part of its gradient on the free surface is ∂ ∂r ′ VL (exterior) l = R−1 ∞ Xl=2 [ l Wl − (l + 1) Ul ] . (60) Plugging it into (58), and benefitting from the orthogonality of surface harmonics, we ob- tain: 12 hPi = − 1 4πGR = 1 4πGR ∞ Xl=2 Z (cid:28) l Ul Xl=2 ∞ (2 l + 1) Z (cid:28) Wl (cid:5) U l (cid:29) dS , (cid:5) W l − (l + 1) Wl (cid:5) U l (cid:29) dS (61a) (61b) which is equivalent to the formulae (18) in Zschau (1978) and (5) in Platzman (1984). This, however, is the last point on which we are still in agreement with our predecessors. 5.4. Writing the integral as a spectral sum Bringing in the dynamical Love numbers kl and the phase lags defined in (12), one can express the products Wl(t) Ul(t) via the spectral components of the disturbance W (t) . 13 Although the formula ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ∞ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ Xl=2 ❤ (2l + 1) DWl(t) Ul(t)E = Xω ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ (2l + 1) ❤ ❤ ❤ W 2 l (ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) (62) ω 2 ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ is often used in the literature (Zchau 1978, Platzman 1984, Segatz et al. 1988), 14 accurate examination demonstrates that it is incorrect. To appreciate this, one simply has to insert the expansions (2) and (12) into the formula (61b) and see what happens. ❤❤ 12 On the boundary, we have: VL l=2 [ Wl(R) + Ul(R) ] , as evident from (59). Together with Wl and Ul Ul (60), this expression was inserted in (58). By doing so, we omitted the diagonal products Wl that vanish after time averaging. (Indeed, Wl is in quadrature with Ul .) En route from (61a) to (61b), we took into account that the time averages of ∂(Ul Wl)/∂t also vanish. is in quadrature with Wl , while Ul ′(R) = P∞ 13 In this subsection, ω is a shortened notation for the mode ωlmpq , not the argument of the pericentre. 14 Our expression (62) is identical to the upper line of the equation (10) in Platzman (1984). (Note a misprint on that line of Platzman's equation: a missing factor of ω .) Our formula (62), when truncated to l = 2 , also becomes equivalent to the equation (22) in Zschau (1978) and to the equation (12) in Segatz et al. (1988). (Both authors kept only the degree-2 terms.) -- 23 -- That the answer differs from (62) was noticed by Peale & Cassen (1978). However, their development also needs correction. Below, we dwell upon this matter in great detail and provide a full inventory of the terms emerging in the spectral expansion for damping rate. At this point, we only mention the two key circumstances: (a) The conventional expression (62) ignores the degeneracy of modes, i.e., a situation where several modes ωlmpq with different sets lmpq take the same numerical value ω . As will be demonstrated in the Section 6, the sum over modes ω in (62) should be substituted with a sum over distinct values of the modes: instead of Xω W 2 l (ω) in (62) , use this : Xω   Xω lmpq = ω 2 Wl(ωlmpq)  where Xω lmpq = ω Wl(ωlmpq) denotes a sum of all terms for which ωlmpq takes a value ω . In short: first sum all the terms corresponding to one value of ω , then square the sum, and only thereafter sum over all the values of ω . (b) Much less intuitive is the fact that the spectral sum will contain extra terms missing completely in the expression (62). As we shall see in Appendix G, these terms look (up to some caveat) as Wl(ω) Wl(−ω) . They show up because two modes of opposite values, ω and − ω , correspond to the same physical frequency ω . For the time being, we use the notation P ♯ : (2l + 1) DWl(t) Ul(t)E = Xω Xl=2 ∞ ♯ where the superscript ♯ down the road. (2l + 1) ω 2 W 2 l (ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) , (63) reminds the reader that the spectral sum needs to be amended Insertion of (63) into (61b) results in: 15 h P i = ♯ 1 8πGR Xω (2 l + 1) ω kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω)Z W 2 l (ω) dS . (64) 15 Were we using complex potentials, we would have Wl U ∗ l instead of Wl Ul in (61b), and would have Wl W ∗ l instead of Wl Wl in (63). -- 24 -- If not for the superscript ♯ , this expression would coincide with the results by Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984). 16 The superscript reminds us of the important caveat in the evaluation of the sum: the factors W 2 l (ω) should be substituted with more complicated expressions, whereas the sum should be carried not over all modes ω = ωlmpq , but over all distinct values of ω , see Section 6. 6. Heat production over tidal modes We must insert the expansions (2) and (12) into the formula (61b) for the heating rate, in order to obtain a comprehensive version of the somewhat symbolic sum (63) and to see ♯ what the modified sum P actually means. A sketchy version of this calculation (which takes into account that the modes may have either sign, but neglects the degeneracy of modes) is given in Appendix G. Extraordinarily laborious, the full calculation is presented in Appendix H. Here we provide the final results. In the case of a uniformly moving pericentre, the average dissipation rate is: G M ∗ 2 a 2l+1 ∞ Xl=2 (cid:18)R a(cid:19) h P i = l Xm=0 (l − m)! (l + m)! (2 − δ0m) l Xp=0 F 2 lmp(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ G 2 lpq(e) χlmpq kl(χlmpq ) sin ǫl(χlmpq ) , (65) where the physical frequencies are the absolute values of the Fourier modes: χlmpq = ωlmpq = (l − 2p) ω + (l − 2p + q) and sin ǫl(χlmpq ) is what they often call 1/Ql M + m ( Ω − θ) ≈ (l − 2p + q) n − m θ , in the literature. 17 (66) 16 Our expression (64) should be compared to the equation (22) from Zschau (1978), in understanding that our expression furnishes the mean damping rate summed over the entire spectrum, whereas Zschau's formula renders the energy loss over a period, at a certain frequency. With these details taken into account, the formulae are equivalent. They are also equivalent to the formulae (10) and (12) in Segatz et al. (1988) and (10) in Platzman (1984). Note, however, that in the first line of Platzman's formula a factor of ω is missing. forcing frequencies (66) are positive definite. Obviously, 17 It would not hurt to reiterate that the Fourier modes ωlmpq can be of either sign, while the physical sin ǫl(χlmpq ) = ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) , because the dynamical Love numbers are even functions, whereas the phase lags are odd and of the same sign as their argument. This is why the tidal quality factors may be expressed as 1/Ql = sin ǫl(χlmpq ) and also as 1/Ql = sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) , with the absolute value symbols being redundant in the former formula and needed in the latter. χlmpq kl(χlmpq ) -- 25 -- In the Appendix H, we also derive a formula for an idle pericentre; but the applicability realm of that formula is limited. 18 Our formula (65) differs from the appropriate expression in Kaula (1964, Eqn 28) that contains a redundant factor (1 + k l)/2 . In the special situation where (a) l = 2 , (b) the body is incompressible, so k2 = 3 h2/5 , 19 (c) the spin is synchronous, with no libration, the expression (65) agrees with the formula (31) from Peale & Cassen (1978). The comparison is carried out in Appendix H. 20 7. Conclusions We have derived from the first principles a formula for the tidal dissipation rate in a homogeneous spherical body. En route to that formula, we compared our intermediate 18 For an idle pericentre, the time-averaged tidal-heating power reads as: h P i = G M ∗ 2 a ∞ a(cid:19) Xl=2 (cid:18) R Xq =−∞ ∞ 2 l + 1 l Xm=0 (l − m)! (l + m)! ( 2 − δ0m ) Glpq(e) [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = q − 2 (p−p ′) l l Flmp(i) Flmp ′ (i) Xp ′=0 Xp=0 cos ( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) , ω0 being the value of the pericentre. This formula is of a limited practical value, since ω0 seldom stays idle. For example, if we are computing tidal damping in a planet perturbed by the star, ω0 of the star as seen from the planet will be evolving due to the equinoctial precession of the planet equator. 19 Static Love numbers of an incompressible spherical planet satisfy the relation (2l + 1) kl = 3 hl . As explained in Appendix F, an analogue of this equality for dynamical Love numbers is (2l + 1) kl(ωlmpq ) = 3 hl(ωlmpq ) . 20 In our expression, all terms are positive-definite, because the factors ω2mpq k2(ω2mpq ) sin ǫ2(ω2mpq ) are even functions of the tidal mode ω2mpq . Peale & Cassen (1978) have their terms proportional to the products 3 . These terms, too, are positive definite, because Peale & Cassen (1978) are using a nonstandard convention 1/Q2mpq ≡ sin ǫ2(ω2mpq ) . Within this convention, the quality factors Q2mpq are not positive definite. 2 − 2p + q − m Q2mpq 5 h2 -- 26 -- results with those by Zschau (1978) and Platzman (1984). When restricted to the special case of an incompressible spherical planet spinning synchronously without libration, our final formula coincides with the commonly used expression from Peale & Cassen (1978, Eqn. 31). We propose to use our equation (65) for rocky planets and moons, instead of the classic formula from Peale & Cassen (1978, eqn 31), because it correctly captures the frequency dependence of tidal dissipation for objects outside the 1:1 resonance. Several applications are provided in the work by Makarov and Efroimsky (2014). Acknowledgments M.E. is indebted to Jeroen Tromp and Mikael Beuthe for pointing out the advantage of the Lagrange description, and to Gabriel Tobie for a very useful exchange on tidal heating. The authors are grateful to James G. Williams for meticulous reading of the manuscript and very judicious comments that were of great help. The authors' special thanks go to the referee, Patrick A. Taylor, whose thoughtful and comprehensive report enabled the authors to improve the quality of the paper significantly. This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System. -- 27 -- Appendix A. The associated Legendre functions and their normalisation The Legendre polynomials are usually defined by the Rodriguez formula: Pl(x) = 1 2 l l! d l dx l (cid:0) x2 − 1(cid:1)l . (A1) The associated Legendre functions Plm(x) (termed associated Legendre polynomials when their argument is sine or cosine of some angle) were introduced by Ferrers (1877) as 21 Plm(x) =(cid:0)1 − x2(cid:1)m/2 dm dxm Pl(x) , where l ≥ m ≥ 0 . (A2) The so-defined associated Legendre functions are sometimes called unnormalised, although a more accurate term would be: in Ferrers' normalisation. This normalisation reads as: Z 1 −1 Plm(x) P l ′ m(x) dx = 2 2 l + 1 (l + m)! (l − m)! δ l l ′ (A3a) or, equivalently: Z π/2 −π/2 Plm(sin φ) P l ′ m(sin φ) cos φ dφ = another equivalent form being Z π 0 Plm(cos ϕ) P l ′ m(cos ϕ) sin ϕ dϕ = 2 2 l + 1 (l + m)! (l − m)! 2 2 l + 1 (l + m)! (l − m)! δ l l ′ , (A3b) δ l l ′ . (A3c) The associated Legendre functions in Ferrers' normalisation should not be confused with the associated Legendre functions Plm(x) which are written in the Schmidt partial normalisation: Z 1 −1 Plm(x) P l ′ m(x) dx = 2 2 l + 1 (2 − δ 0 m) δ l l ′ . (A4) For more on these normalisations, see Winch et al. (2005). 21 Sometimes in the literature they also use the functions P m l (x) = (−1)m (cid:0)1 − x2(cid:1)m/2 dm dxm Pl(x) = (−1)m Plm(x) , as defined, e.g., in Abramowitz & Stegun (1972, p. 332). There also exists a different convention wherein P m l (x) lacks the (−1)m multiplier and thus coincides with Plm(x) , as in Arfken & Weber (1995, p. 623). -- 28 -- B. Keeping ω implies either keeping M0 or defining M as dn/dt Under disturbance, the mean anomaly is written as M = M0 + Z t t0 n(t) dt , where n(t) ≡ pG (M + M ∗) a−3(t) , (B1) so the expression (5) for the Fourier tidal modes acquires the form of (cid:5) ωlmpq ≡ (cid:5)vlmpq − m Kaula (1964, equation 40) makes an oversight by accepting the approximation θ = (l − 2p) ( ω + M0) + q M0 + (l − 2p + q) n + m ( Ω − θ) . (B2) (cid:5) (cid:5) M = M0 + n ≈ n . (B3) M0 ω and Indeed, as are often of the same order, it is incorrect to keep the former M0 are of the while neglecting the latter. We present two examples. In the first, same order but of opposite signs, so they largely compensate one another. This suggests a M0 turn out to be of simultaneous neglect of both terms. In the second example, the same order and the same sign, so keeping one of these terms requires keeping the other. ω and ω and B.1. Example 1. Tidal perturbation of a low-inclination, low-eccentricity orbit Consider a low-inclined perturber. From the tides it creates, the perturber gets pre- dominantly transversal orbital disturbance. We need two planetary equations in the Gauss form (Brouwer & Clemence 1961, page 301, eqn 33): 22 (cid:5)ω = √1 − e2 n a e (cid:5) M0 = (cid:20)− R cos f + (cid:18) 1 + 1 − e2 n a e (cid:20)(cid:18) cos f − 2 r p(cid:19) T sin f(cid:21) − r p e(cid:19) R − (cid:18) 1 + sin(ω + f ) cot i n a √1 − e2 p(cid:19) T sin f(cid:21) , r r a W , where f is the true anomaly, p ≡ a (1 − e2) is the semilatus rectum , while R , T , and W are the radial, transversal, and normal-to-orbit forces, respectively. In a situation where the 22 The system (33) in Brouwer & Clemence (1961, page 301) contains an equation for the rate dǫ/dt , where (as explained on the preceding page in Ibid.) ǫ is understood as ǫ I ≡ M0 + ω = M0 + ω + Ω . -- 29 -- perturbation is predominantly transversal and the terms with R and W may be neglected, we obtain: (cid:5)ω + (cid:5) M0 ≈ e 1 + √1 − e2 √1 − e2 n a (cid:18) 1 + r p(cid:19) T sin f . (B4) A low-inclined moon gets predominantly transversal orbital disturbance from the tides it creates in the planet. Inserting the latter expression in the formula (B2) for the Fourier modes, we see that for the modes with a zero q (like the semidiurnal tide parameterised with lmpq = 2200 ) the input from the pericentre rate may be omitted, if the eccentricity is not too large. Indeed, for q = 0 , the term q M0 vanishes, while the term (l − 2p)( ω + M0) is now approximated with (l− 2p) multiplied by the expression (B4). Although ω and M0 can, separately, be substantial, their sum (B4) is smaller by the order of e . Being (in this M0 largely compensate one particular case) of the same order but of opposite sign, M0 , we should also drop ω . In this special case, another. Therefore, if we choose to drop dropping of both will be legitimate. ω and As a useful aside, we would remind that the mean longitude is defined through L ≡ M + ω + Ω , its rate being L ≡ pG (M + M ∗) a−3(t) + M0 + ω + Ω . As we have M0 and ω largely compensate one another and may both be neglected just seen, the rates in the considered case. If, above that, the rate of the node happens to be negligible, then the mean motion from the Kepler law will be close to the mean longitude rate. B.2. Example 2. Orbital perturbation due to oblateness The situation is different where the principal perturbation is due to the oblateness of the tidally perturbed primary. The mean rates (Vallado 2007, pp. 647 - 648) (cid:5) 3 4 n J2 M0 = 4 − 5 sin2 i (1 − e2)2 are of the same order and sign. Therefore, when keeping (cid:5)ω , we must also include 2 − 3 sin2 i (1 − e2)3/2 R2 a2 R2 a2 (cid:5)ω = n J2 and 3 4 . (cid:5) M0 . The easiest way to get rid of (cid:5) M0 is to define the mean motion as n ≡ M . This, the so-called anomalistic mean motion will, however, differ from pG (M + M ∗) a−3(t) . C. Universality of the Darwin-Kaula description As we saw earlier, to obtain the decomposition (12) from the Fourier series (2), each term of the latter series must be endowed with a mitigating factor kl = kl(ωlmpq) of its -- 30 -- own and, likewise, must acquire its own phase lag ǫl = ǫl(ωlmpq ) . In the literature, some authors enquired whether this mitigate-and-lag method is general enough to describe tides. The answer to this question is affirmative, insofar as the tides are linear. Without going into details (to be found in Efroimsky 2012 a, b), we would mention that an l−degree part of the operator (11) is a convolution called the Love operator: Ul(r, t) = (cid:18)R r(cid:19)l +1Z t −∞ kl(t − t ′) Wl (R , r ∗, t ′) dt ′ , (C1) Indeed, linearity of tides means that, at each time t , the overall magnitude of reaction depends linearly on the magnitudes of the disturbance at all preceding instants of time, t ′ ≤ t . The emergence of inputs from earlier times stems from the inertia ("memory") of the material. A disturbance that took place at an instant t ′ appears in the integral for Ul(r, t) with a weight kl(t − t ′) that depends on the elapsed time. Following Churkin (1998), who gave this formalism its present shape, we call these weights Love functions. In the frequency domain, the above convolution becomes: ¯Ul(ω) = (cid:18) R r (cid:19)l+1 ¯kl(ω) ¯Wl(ω) , (C2) is the tidal mode (not the periapse); ¯Ul(ω) and ¯Wl(ω) are the Fourier where ω = ωlmpq or Laplace images of the potentials Ul(r, t) and Wl(R, r∗, t) ; while the complex Love numbers ¯kl(ω) = ¯kl(ω) e −i ǫl (ω) = kl(ω) e −i ǫl (ω) (C3) are the Fourier or Laplace components of the Love functions kl(t−t ′) . The actual dynamical Love numbers are the real parts of the complex Love numbers, kl(ω) = ¯kl(ω) ; while the tidal lags are the complex Love numbers' negative phases. The frequency dependencies ¯kl(ω) and, consequently, kl(ω) and ǫl(ω) can be derived from the expression for the complex compliance ¯J(χ) or the complex rigidity ¯µ(χ) = 1/ ¯J(χ) of the mantle (with χ = χlmpq ≡ ωlmpq being the physical forcing frequency). The dependency ¯J(χ) follows from the rheological model. Evidently, the formula (C2) is but a concise version of (12). Thus we see that the mitigate-and-lag method ensues directly from the linearity assumption. D. The Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions. -- 31 -- Perturbative approach to a periodically deformed body D.1. Perturbative treatment Under perturbation, two changes will happen in a point r at a time t : 1. Physical fields will now acquire different values in this point at this time. For example, a moon fixed in a certain position relative to the planetary surface will render some distribution of its potential over the volume of the host planet. The same moon fixed in a different position will generate a different distribution of its poten- tial. This, in its turn, will yield a different deformation of the planet and therefore a different spatial distribution of its tidal-response potential and of all other quantities. Thus, instead of the unperturbed Eulerian dependencies q0 E (r , t) , we now have qE (r , t) = q0 E (r , t) + q ′ E (r , t) . (D1) 2. A different particle will now arrive in the point r at the time t . It will not be the same particle as the one expected there at the time t in the absence of perturbation. On the other hand, a particle that starts in X at t = 0 , will appear, at the time t , not in the point x = f (X, t) but in some other place r = x + u = f (X, t) + u(X, t) . (D2) These two changes will influence the Lagrangian dependencies on the initial conditions. The dependency of each field will obtain a variation q ′ L(X, t) : qL(X, t) = q0 L(X, t) + q ′ L(X, t) . (D3) In the absence of perturbation, the particle X was destined to arrive in x , wherefore q0 L(X, t) was defined through (17). Under perturbation, the same particle X is expected -- 32 -- to end up in r , so the Lagrangian dependency becomes qL(X, t) ≡ qE (r , t) = qE ( f (X, t) + u(X, t) , t ) = qE ( f (X, t) , t ) + u(X, t) ∇x qE + O(u2) = q0 E ( f (X, t) , t ) + q ′ E ( f (X, t) , t ) + u(X, t) ∇x qE + O(u2) . Insertion of (D3) into the left-hand side of (D4) will give us: (D4a) (D4b) (D4c) (D4d) q0 L(X, t) + q ′ L(X, t) = q0 E ( f (X, t) , t ) + q ′ E ( f (X, t) , t ) + u(X, t) ∇x qE + O(u2) . Subtracting (17b) from this formula, we arrive at a relation between the perturbations of the Lagrangian and Eulerian quantities: q ′ L(X, t) = q ′ E ( f (X, t) , t ) + u(X, t) ∇x qE + O(u2) , (D5) where the first term on the right-hand side, q ′ E (x, t) , expresses the change in the final spatial distribution of the field q . The other two terms show up because perturbation changes the mapping from X to the current location. D.2. An equivalent description A slightly different, although equally valid viewpoint is possible. In a reference setting, at time t , an observer located in x will see the arrival of a particle that started from X : q0 L(X, t) ≡ q0 E (x , t) (D6) In a perturbed situation, the same observer in x will register, at the time t , the arrival of a different particle, one that started from X − U : which is: qL(X − U, t) ≡ qE (x , t) , qL(X, t) − U ∇X qL + O(U 2) = qE (x , t) . Subtraction of (D6) from (D7b) gives us the variations: qL(X, t) − q0 L(X, t) − U ∇X qL + O(U 2) = qE (x , t) − q0 E (x , t) (D7a) (D7b) (D8a) -- 33 -- or, simply, L(X, t) = q ′ q ′ Introducing the Jacobian J ≡ dV t E (x , t) + U ∇X qL + O(U 2) . dV 0 = det ∂xi ∂Xj , we write: U ∇X qL = U J ∇x qE = u ∇x qE , (D8b) (D9) with u ≡ UJ . Thus (D8b) and (D5) are equivalent insofar as O(U2) = O(u2) . While the language of (D5) is more conventional than that of (D8), the latter description is easier for physical interpretation. Suppose we are observing gradual cooling of a flow. In an unperturbed setting, a particle, that started in X at the time t = 0 , will show up in x at the time t . Accordingly, a measurement of the temperature in x at the time t will render, in the absence of perturbation, a value to which the particle X has cooled down by this time -- see the equality (D6). Under perturbation, the rate of cooling of each particle will change. In addition, owing to the change of trajectories, a different particle will show up in x at the time t . Now this will be a particle that started its movement at t = 0 from some point X − U . So a measurement of the temperature in the point x at the time t will now give us a temperature value to which the particle X − U has cooled down -- see the equation (D7a). The difference between the measurements performed in x in the perturbed and unper- L(X, t) − U ∇X qL + O(U 2) . turbed cases will, according to (D8b), read as q ′ The first term on the right renders the cooling down of the particle arriving in x at the time t , while the second and third terms reflect the fact that, under disturbance, we register a particle arriving from a point displaced by U , compared to the particle that would be brought to x by an unperturbed flow. E (x , t) = q ′ With aid of (D9), the expression (D8b) can be equivalently rewritten as Dt = ∂t + v ∇x , (D10) where v ≡ ∂u/∂t , while D ≡ d/dt is the comoving derivative. The physical interpretation of (D10) is obvious: the rate of cooling of a moving particle, dq/dt , can be measured by a quiescent observer. The observer, however, must amend his result, ∂q/∂t , with a correction taking into account the fact that, being quiescent, he is measuring the difference between the temperature of different particles passing by, not of the same particle. -- 34 -- D.3. Periodically deformed solids. Linearisation Hereafter, we shall restrict our consideration to the case of a periodically deformed solid. It is natural to associate the reference trajectory x = f (X, t) with the equilibrium configuration. In this configuration, the particles stay idle, so x coincides with the initial value X : x = f (X, t) , where f (X, t) = X for all t , (D11) while all properties keep in time their fiducial values: L(X, t) = q0 q0 E (x, t) = q0 . (D12) Be mindful that the superscript 0 did not originally mark a value fixed in time but a trajectory chosen to be reference. It is only now, that the role of a reference configuration is played by an equilibrium body, the superscript 0 begins to denote an unchanging value. For a particle originally located in X , its perturbed trajectory r differs from its refer- ence trajectory x by some u : r = x + u = f (X, t) + u(X, t) . (D13) When the reference trajectory is the equilibrium, insertion of (D11) into (D13) results in which can also be written as r = X + u(X, t) , r = x + u(x, t) , (D14a) (D14b) because, in this case, the unperturbed trajectory x always coincides with the initial value X . We work in a linearised approximation, neglecting the term O(u2) in (D5) and writing all expansions up to terms linear in the displacement u or velocity v ≡ du/dt . For a short and simple explanation of the linearised Lagrangian and Eulerian descrip- tions of tides, see Wang (1997). A more comprehensive treatment is offered in the book by Dahlen & Tromp (1998, Section 3.1.1). D.4. Conservation of mass in the Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions Denote the Eulerian value of the mass density with ρE (r, t) . As mass cannot be destroyed or created, its amount in a comoving volume V t of a flow stays constant: d dt ZV t ρE dV t = 0 . (D15) -- 35 -- For the reference history x = f (X, t) , this would imply: ZV t ref ρ 0 E (x , t) d4x = ZV 0 E (X , 0) d4X . ρ 0 (D16a) For a perturbed history r = f (X, t) + u(X, t) , we have: ZV t pert ρE (r , t) d4r = ZV 0 ρE (X , 0) d4X . (D16b) For each individual particle, its perturbed trajectory r stems from the same initial position X as the appropriate reference trajectory x , so the initial densities are the same: ρE (X , 0) = ρ 0 E (X , 0) . (D17) At later times, however, ρE (r, t) and ρ 0 E (x, t) have different functional forms. D.4.1. The continuity law in the Eulerian description The right-hand sides of the formulae (D16a) and (D16b) coincide, as they render the E (X, 0) . Thus the left-hand sides of the mass of the same initial distribution ρE (X, 0) = ρ 0 two formulae also coincide: 0 = ZV t pert ρE (r , t) d4r − ZV t ref ρ 0 E (x , t) d4x , (D18) as the mass stays unchanged, no matter whether the system follows the reference history or a perturbed one. Now switch from the perturbed coordinates, r , to the reference ones, x : 0 = Z d4x (cid:2) J ρE (r , t) − ρ 0 = Z d4x (cid:2) ( 1 + ∇x · u ) ρE (r , t) − ρ 0 E (x , t)(cid:3) E (x , t)(cid:3) , where the Jacobian is: (D19a) (D19b) pert dV t dV t ref ∂ri ∂xj = det J ≡ From this we see that the Jacobian can also be written as 23 = 1 + ∇x · u + O(u2) = 1 + J ∇r · u + O(u2) . (D20a) J = 1 + O(u2) 1 − ∇r · u = 1 + ∇r · u + O(u2) . (D20b) 23 The expression (D20b) indicates that, within a linear approximation, we do not need to distinguish between ∇r and ∇x = J ∇r = ∇r + (∇r · u)∇r + O(u2) , when the operators are applied to a quantity that, by itself, is of the first order of smallness. -- 36 -- From (D19a), we obtain the exact equality ρE (r , t) J = ρ 0 E (x , t) , a linearised version thereof being 0 = ρE (r , t) (1 + ∇r · u) − ρ 0 E (r − u , t) + O(u2) (D21) (D22a) = ρE (r , t) − ρ 0 E (r , t) + ρE (r , t) ∇r · u + u ∇r ρ 0 E (r , t) + O(u2) .(D22b) For a small t , the deviation u between the two trajectories is linear in time, and so is the difference between the perturbed and reference density functions. Thus, we may change ρE (r, t) ∇r · u to ρ 0 E (r, t) ∇r · u , to obtain an expression correct to first order in u : where the finite variation is ρE ′ + ∇r ·(cid:0)ρ 0 E u(cid:1) = 0 , ρE ′(r, t) ≡ ρE (r, t) − ρ 0 E (r, t) . (D23) (D24) We would reiterate that the perturbative approach to Eulerian quantities implies comparison between their present spatial distributions. So the two histories are compared in the same point r and at the same time t . In (D22b), we could also have changed u∇r ρ 0 to u∇r ρE (r, t) . Then, instead ′ + ∇r · (ρE u) = 0 , without the superscript 0 in of (D23), we would have obtained ρE the second term. In the linear approximation, however, this would be no better than (D23). Traditionally, the form (D23) is preferred in the literature. E (r, t) However, when switching to a differential form of the conservation law, we no longer need E (r, t) becomes to keep the superscript 0 , because the difference between ρE (r, t) and ρ 0 infinitesimally small. So the differential law reads as: ∂ρE ∂t + ∇r · (ρE v) = 0 , (D25) where v ≡ ∂u/∂t , the partial derivative giving the rate of change with coordinates fixed. Employment of the perturbative formula (D23) near a deformable free boundary requires some care. On the one hand, the reference density ρ 0 E (r) makes an abrupt step there. On the other hand, due to deformation of the boundary, we may get a finite present density in a point where the reference density used to be zero, and vice versa. -- 37 -- D.4.2. The continuity law in the Lagrangian description The Lagrangian density is introduced in the standard way (D4a): so the formula (D21) becomes: ρL(X, t) ≡ ρE (r, t) , ρL(X , t) J = ρ 0 E (x , t) . (D26) (D27a) For a periodically deformed solid, the reference density ρ 0 formed, stable configuration. So ρ 0 the equality (D27a) becomes simply E (x, t) = ρ 0 E (x, t) is the density of the unde- E (X, 0) = ρ 0(X) is time-independent, and ρL(X , t) J = ρ 0 E (X) . (D27b) In accordance with the general formula (D5), we interrelate the density variations as ρL ′(X , t) = ρE ′(x , t) + u ∇xρ 0 E (x , t) . (D28a) In the considered case of small periodic variations, the reference trajectory is simply x = X at all times; so on the right-hand side of the above formula we have a gradient of a constant- in-time stationary distribution: ∇x ρ 0(x, t) = ∇X ρ 0(X) . Thence we obtain: ρL ′(X , t) = ρE ′(X , t) + u ∇X ρ 0 E (X) . Combining this formula with (D23), we arrive at 24 ρL ′ + ρ 0 E ∇X · u = 0 , (D28b) (D29) where ρL ′ = ρL ′(X, t) , while ρ 0 E = ρ 0 E (X) . 24 When combining (D28b) with (D23), we should not be confused by the fact that in (D28b) all quantities are functions of X , while in (D23 - D24) these quantities show up as functions of r . Nor should we be confused by ∇ denoting ∇r in (D23) and ∇X in (D28b). As our intention is simply to compare the functions, we are free to change the notations in (D23 - D24) from r to X , whereafter (D29) will come out trivially. -- 38 -- D.5. The Poisson equation D.5.1. In the Eulerian description Perturbed or not, the density always obeys the Poisson equation; while the perturbing potential W obeys the Laplace equation outside the perturber: ∇ 2 r VE = − 4 π G ρE , r V 0 ∇ 2 E = − 4 π G ρ 0 E , ∇ 2 r WE = 0 . (D30a) (D30b) (D30c) Subtraction of (D30b) from (D30a) results in a Poisson equation for the density perturbation: ∇ 2 r VE ′ = − 4 π G ρE ′ or, equivalently: ∇ 2 r UE = − 4 π G ρE where we took into account the relations (31) and (D30c). ′ , (D31) (D32) D.5.2. In the Lagrangian description Insertion of the formulae (27) and (32) into the Eulerian version of the Poisson equation, (D31), results in the Lagrangian version of this equation: ∇ 2 r (cid:0) VL ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) = − 4 π G (cid:0) ρL ′ − u · ∇x ρ 0(cid:1) . A switch to differentiation over the initial position, ∇x , would entail corrections of the order of O(u2) . In neglect of those, the equation may be written as (D33a) ∇ 2 x (cid:0) VL For an initially homogeneous body, the above formulae simplify to: and ′ − u · ∇x ρ 0(cid:1) . ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) = − 4 π G (cid:0) ρL ∇ 2 r (cid:0) VL ∇ 2 x (cid:0) VL ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) = − 4 π G ρL ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) = − 4 π G ρL ′ ′ (D33b) (D34a) . (D34b) -- 39 -- E. Boundary conditions The boundary condition on the total Eulerian potential VE is trivial. To avoid infinite forces, the potential must be continuous: (exterior) E V = V (interior) E . (E1) The boundary condition on the potential's gradient emerges as a corollary of the Gauss theorem and therefore mimics a similar condition from electrostatics. 25 Let a small area ~s = s n of the free surface be sandwiched between the top and bottom of a cylinder of an infinitesimal height u = ~u · ~s/s , with the vector ~u being the tidal displacement. The top and bottom should each have the principal curvature radii coinciding with those of the free surface, but in the leading order this can be ignored, with the enclosed volume thus being u s = ~u · ~s . In neglect of the contributions from the infinitesimally small side areas of the cylinder, employment of the Gauss theorem for the Eulerian potential gives: − 4 π G ρ0 ~u · ~s = Zs ∇x VE · d~s = ∇x V (exterior) E · ~s − ∇x V (interior) E · ~s . (E2) Over a surface between layers, the condition will read as (exterior) (cid:0) 4 π G ρ 0 ~u · ~s(cid:1) or, equivalently, − (cid:0)4 π G ρ 0 ~u · ~s(cid:1) (interior) = ∇x V (exterior) E · ~s − ∇x V (interior) E · ~s (E3) (cid:20) − 4 π G ρ 0 u + ∂ ∂ n VE(cid:21) (exterior) = (cid:20) − 4 π G ρ 0 u + ∂ ∂ n VE(cid:21) (interior) . (E4) In application to tides, it can be interpreted like this: the discontinuity in attraction is equal to the attraction of the deformation bulge (Legros et al. 2006). Since V0 , W and their normal gradients are continuous on the boundary, the conditions on U and V ′ look exactly like (E1 - E4). Specifically, in Section 5.1 we need the conditions on the total variation V ′ : (exterior) ′ VE = VE ′ (interior) (E5) (cid:20) − 4 π G ρ0 ~u + ∂ ∂ n VE ′(cid:21) (exterior) = (cid:20) − 4 π G ρ0 ~u + ∂ ∂ n VE ′(cid:21) (interior) . (E6) 25 Melchior (1972) attributes the derivation of the boundary condition to Michel Chasles. -- 40 -- The Eulerian and Lagrangian potentials are interrelated through VE ′ = VL ′ − u · ∇x V 0 . Thence, in the Lagrangian description, the conditions will acquire the form of (exterior) (cid:2) VL ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:3) = (cid:2) VL ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:3) (interior) and (E7) (E8) (exterior) (interior) . (E9) ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) − 4 π G ρ0 u(cid:21) (cid:20) ∂ ′ − u · ∇x V 0(cid:1) − 4 π G ρ0 u(cid:21) ∂ n (cid:0)VL When the boundary is welded or its normal is parallel to ∇x V 0 , the term − u · ∇x V 0 becomes continuous (Wang 1997). It, thus, can be removed from (E8), rendering the incre- mental Lagrangian potential continuous. This term, however, cannot be omitted in (E9). = (cid:20) ∂ ∂ n (cid:0)VL F. Interrelation between dynamical Love numbers, for an incompressible homogeneous sphere For an incompressible homogeneous spherical body, the static Love numbers read as kl = 3 1 2 (l − 1) 1 + Al and hl = 2 l + 1 2 (l − 1) 1 1 + Al , where Al ≡ (2 l 2 + 4 l + 3) µ l g ρ R = 3 (2 l 2 + 4 l + 3) µ 4 l π G ρ2 R2 = 3 (2 l 2 + 4 l + 3) 4 l π G ρ2 R2 J . (F1) (F2) µ and J = 1/µ being the relaxed rigidity and compliance, and G being Newton's gravity constant. The formulae (F1) yield a well-known relation connecting the static Love numbers: (2 l + 1) kl = 3 hl . (F3) Expressions (F1) are obtained by solving a system comprising the static version of the Second Law of Newton and the constitutive equation interconnecting the stress and strain through the rigidity µ . A wonderful theorem, called the correspondence principle or the elastic-viscoelastic analogy , tells us that in many situations the dynamical versions of the Second Law of Newton and constitutive equation, when written in the frequency domain as algebraic equations for operational moduli, mimic the static versions of these equations. In order for this correspondence to take place, the accelerations and inertial forces should be -- 41 -- negligibly small (see, e.g., Appendix B to Efroimsky 2012 a). In that case, the complex Love numbers ¯kl(ω) and ¯hl(ω) will be expressed through the complex operational moduli ¯µ or ¯J in the same algebraic manner as the static kl and hl are expressed via the static µ or J . Also recall that the static expressions (F1) were derived under an extra assumption of incompressibility. If this assumption is also valid in the dynamical case, then the complex ¯kl(ω) and ¯hl(ω) are expressed through the complex ¯µ or ¯J by formulae mimicking (F1), whence an expression like (F3) ensues for ¯kl(ω) and ¯hl(ω) . Its imaginary part will read as: (2 l + 1) kl(ω) sin ǫ(ω) = 3 hl(ω) sin ǫ(ω) , (F4) where kl(ω) ≡ ¯kl(ω) , hl(ω) ≡ ¯hl(ω) and ω = ωlmpq . To draw to a close, we would emphasise that in the static expression (F2) the letters µ and J ≡ 1/µ stand for the static (relaxed) values of the rigidity and compliance. In a dynamical analogue of this expression, the same letters will denote the unrelaxed values. G. Heat production over tidal modes. A sketchy derivation of the formula (65), in neglect of the "degeneracy" To compute the dissipation rate at separate tidal modes, it is necessary to insert the expansions (2) and (12) into the formula (61b) for the heating rate. This will render a comprehensive version of the somewhat symbolic sum (63) and will enable us to understand what the modified sum P below. Here we present a simplified sketch of that derivation. ♯ actually means. A full calculation is presented in Appendix H Recall that several different Fourier modes ωlmpq can share the same value ω . Bor- rowing a term from quantum mechanics, we call this degeneracy of modes. As a prelusory exercise, we calculate dissipation at different modes, neglecting the degeneracy. In other words, suppose that all Fourier modes ω ≡ ωlmpq have different values. Under this simpli- fying assumption, the expression under the integral in (61b) becomes: ∞ Xl=2 (2l + 1) DWl(t) Ul(t)E -- 42 -- = Xω, ω ′ (2l + 1) DWl(ω ′) coshω ′t + ϕWl (ω ′)i ( − ω) Ul(ω) sinhωt + ϕUl (ω)iE ω 2 (2l + 1) = −Xω, ω ′ Wl(ω ′) Ul(ω) D sinh (ω − ω ′) t + ϕUl + sinh (ω + ω ′) t + ϕUl (ω ′)i (ω ′)iE , (G1a) where h . . .i denotes time averaging. Of the two sine functions on the right-hand side, we would have kept only the first one, had the Fourier tidal modes been positive-definite. In the tidal theory, however, the Fourier modes ω = ωlmpq can assume either sign, so both sine functions must be taken into account: (ω) − ϕWl (ω) + ϕWl 2 n Wl(ω) Ul(ω) sinhϕUl (ω) − ϕWl (ω)i + Wl(−ω) Ul(ω) sinhϕUl (ω) + ϕWl (−ω)io (G1b) l (ω) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) + Xω (2l + 1) ω 2 Wl(ω) Wl(−ω) kl(ω) sin ǫ ′ l(ω) , (G1c) ∞ ω (2l + 1) (2l + 1) DWl(t) Ul(t)E = Xl=2 −Xω =Xω (2l + 1) W 2 ω 2 where we recalled that the dynamical Love number is an even function of the Fourier mode. On the right-hand side of (G1c), the first sum is a much expected input coinciding with the expression obtained by other authors -- see, e.g., the first line of formula (10) in Platzman (1984). 26 This input is proportional to kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) , where ǫl(ω) ≡ ϕWl (ω) − ϕUl (ω) (G2) is the tidal phase lag at the frequency ω = ωlmpq . The second sum in (G1c) comes into being due to the fact that the Fourier modes are not positive-definite. This input contains a factor of kl(ω) sin ǫ ′ l(ω) is, generally, different from the phase lag (G2) appropriate to the mode ω = ωlmpq . Indeed, l(ω) , where the angle ǫ ′ ǫ ′ l(ω) ≡ − h ϕUl (ω) + ϕWl (−ω)i = ϕWl (ω) − ϕUl (ω) − ϕWl = ǫl(ω) − h ϕWl (−ω) (−ω)i . (G3) (ω) − ϕWl (ω) + ϕWl 26 The second line in Platzman's formula renders oceanic and atmospheric inputs. -- 43 -- At first glance, this result is most unphysical. Usually, to calculate dissipation rate, we have to sum, over physical frequencies or over Fourier modes, terms proportional to the sines of phase lags at those modes. The addition of a finite phase to those lags looks bizarre. However, an accurate calculation carried out in the Appendix H shows that the phase consists of two parts. One is equal to (cid:2) ( − 1) l − 1(cid:3) π/2 , so its presence renders an overall factor of (−1) l . The other part of the phase is (m ′ + m) λ , so after integration over the surface, it results in a δ(m ′ + m) factor, 27 where m is the second index of ωlmpq = ω , while m ′ is the second index of ωlm′p′q′ = − ω : hPi = 1 4 π G R ∞ Xl=2 1 4 π G R Xω (2 l + 1) (2 l + 1) Z dS h W (t) U (t) i = 2 Z dS Wl(ω) (cid:2) Wl(ω) + (−1)l δ(m ′ + m) Wl(−ω)(cid:3) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) . ω (G4) The indices m and m ′ being nonnegative (see the equation 2), the emergence of δ(m ′ + m) indicates that the summation in the second part must be reduced to m = m ′ = 0 : hPi = 1 4 π G R Z dS  lmpq  Xω = ω + Xω = ω l0pq ω 2 (2l + 1) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) W 2 l (ω) ω 2 (2l + 1) kl(ω) sin ǫl(ω) (−1)l Wl(ω) Wl(−ω)  . (G5) We then see what the superscript ♯ introduced in (63 - 64) actually implies: ♯ Xω . . . W 2 l (ω) ≡ Xω = ω lmpq . . . W 2 l (ω) + Xω = ω l0pq . . . (−1)l Wl(ω) Wl(−ω) , (G6) where the first sum on the right-hand side is complete (i.e., goes over all modes), while the second sum is only over the modes with a vanishing second index. 27 The finite phase assumes the value of (cid:2)(− 1) l − 1(cid:3) π/2 + (m ′ + m)λ , with the integer m ′ being the order of ω ′ = ωlm′p′q′ , and m being that of ω = ωlmpq . The presence of (cid:2) (− 1) l − 1(cid:3) π/2 in the phase is equivalent to multiplying the sum by (−1) l . So, for even l , this part of the phase can be ignored. The presence of the term (m ′ + m) λ in the phase tells us that, after integration over the surface, only the terms l(ω) = (−1)l ǫl(ω) δ(m ′ + m) . with m ′ = m = 0 stay. Hence, after integration, we are effectively left with ǫ′ -- 44 -- Now, what is Wl(ω) ? Naıvely, Wl(ω) ≡ Wl(ωlmpq ) should be the real magnitude of the term Wlmpq of Kaula's series (2). In reality, we have degeneracy of modes, so in each of the two Fourier series (for W and for U ) we first must group together the terms corresponding to each actual value of mode, and only afterward should we multiply the series by one another and perform time averaging. This calculation is presented in Appendix H. H. Heat production over tidal modes. An accurate derivation of the formula (65) As was explained above, the actual Wl(ω) will be a sum of several Wl(ωlmpq) , over all the sets lmpq furnishing the same value of ω . Thence, in (G6) and elsewhere, summation over ω will be not a sum over lmpq , but a sum over all distinct values of ωlmpq . These details would be irrelevant, were we summing terms linear in Wl(ωlmpq) . In that case, to group terms and then to sum the groups would be the same as to sum all the terms at once. We however are dealing with the expression (G6) quadratic in Wl , wherefore the said details matter a lot. Incorporation of those complicates the calculation technically, though the main idea remains the same as in (G5). H.1. Prefatory algebra First, it would be convenient to rewrite the formula (2) for the perturbing potential as W (R , r ∗) = Wl , ∞ Xl=2 where Wl = Xm′p′q′ Wlm′p′q′ = l Xm′=0 l Xp′=0 ∞ Xj= − ∞ (H1) Alm′p′q′ cos (vlm′p′q′ − m′ (λ + θ) + ψlm′) , (H2) l (l − m′)! (l + m′)! ( 2 − δ0m′ ) Plm′(sin φ) Flm′p′(i) Glp′q′(e) , (H3) Alm′p′q′ = − a G M ∗ (cid:18) R a (cid:19) − 1i π ψlm′ = h ( − 1) l−m′ 4 . (H4) -- 45 -- Similarly, the formula (12) for the additional tidal potential at r = R should be cast as U(R , r ∗) = Ul , ∞ Xl=2 where Ulmpq = Ul =Xmpq l Xm=0 l Xp=0 ∞ Xq= − ∞ (H5) Blmpq cos (vlmpq − m (λ + θ) + ψlm − ǫlmpq) , (H6) Blmpq = kl(ωlmpq) Almpq , (H7) ψlm is given by (H4), while ǫlmpq is the phase lag (13b). In (H7) we omitted the multiplier l+1 ( R/r ) , as we are interested in the values of U over the surface where r = R . The product of the quantities Wl and Ul reads as Wl Ul = − Xm′p′q′Xmpq Alm′p′q′ cos (vlm′p′q′ − m′(λ + θ) + ψlm′) ωlmpqBlmpq sin (vlmpq − m(λ + θ) + ψlm − ǫlmpq) (H8) = − 1 2 Xm′p′q′Xmpq Alm′p′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( vlm′p′q′ + vlmpq − (m′ + m) (λ + θ) + ψlm′ + ψlm − ǫlmpq ) + 1 2 Xm′p′q′Xmpq Alm′p′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( vlm′p′q′ − vlmpq − (m′ − m) (λ + θ) + ψlm′ − ψlm + ǫlmpq ) . The formula (61b) for the heating rate contains a time-average of the product Wl Ul , inte- grated over the surface. In the first sum of (H8), integration over the longitude λ will leave only the terms with m′ = m = 0 . (Recall that m′ and m are nonnegative.) In the second sum, integration over λ will eliminate all terms except the ones with m′ = m . Therefore, 1 Wl Ul = − + 2 Xp′q′ Xpq 2 Xm Xp′q′ Xpq 1 Al0p′q′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ( vl0p′q′ + vl0pq + 2 ψl0 − ǫl0pq ) Almp′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( vlmp′q′ − vlmpq + ǫlmpq ) + . . . , (H9a) -- 46 -- the ellipsis denoting the terms which are to vanish after integration over the longitude λ . The presence of the phase 2ψl0 =(cid:2)( − 1) l − 1(cid:3) π/2 in the first sum is equivalent to multiplying the sum by (−1) l . Combined with the formula (3) for vlmpq , this observation gives us: Wl Ul = 1 + − Al0p′q′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω + (2 (l − p ′ − p) + q ′ + q) M − ǫl0pq) (−1) l 2 Xp′q′ Xpq 2 Xm Xp′q′ Xpq M and ω being the mean anomaly and the argument of the pericentre of the perturber. In Section 2.3, we defined the mean motion n as the mean anomaly rate Almp′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( 2 (p − p ′) ω + (2p − q − 2p ′ + q ′) M + ǫlmpq ) + . . . (cid:5) M . Thence 28 , (H9b) Wl Ul = (−1) l 2 Xp′q′ Xpq 2 Xm Xp′q′ Xpq 1 + Al0p′q′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ( − 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω − (2 (l − p ′ − p) + q ′ + q) n t + ǫl0pq ) Almp′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( 2 (p − p ′) ω + (2p − q − 2p ′ + q ′) n t + ǫlmpq ) + . . . , (H9c) where we have moved the "minus" sign inside the sine function in the first sum. Selecting the secular terms in the above sum, we notice that some of those contain not only the phase lag but also finite phases proportional to the initial value of the pericentre. Naturally, such ugly terms come in pairs containing equal but opposite initial phase. Each such pair renders a mutual input proportional to the sine of the phase lag ǫlmpq . 28 The epoch t0 = 0 is set at the instant of periapse crossing whence M is reckoned. So we write the mean anomaly simply as M = n t . Calculating the present rate of dissipation, we average over one or several cycles of tidal flexure, and not over the entire time span since the epoch (which may be distant). For a Keplerian orbit, M changes uniformly with time and always assumes a value of 2 π N at a periapse crossing, with N being integer. So we can always set M = 0 at a recent crossing and can reckon time from there (i.e, set t0 = 0 at that moment). In realistic situations, M = R t M .) Despite the apsidal precession, M will still be changing by 2π between two subsequent periapse crossings. It however will no longer be right to substitute the integral with a product of n by a time interval. Despite this, we still can set t0 = 0 and M = 0 at a recent crossing, and can approximate the integral with n t over several rotations sufficient for our averaging. (No M0 term here, as we agreed to define n as n(t ′) dt ′ . t0 (cid:5) -- 47 -- 1 + (−1) l 2 Xp′q′ Xpq 2 Xm Xp q Xp ′ q ′ 2 Xm Xpqq′ p ′6=p + 1 To demonstrate this, single out the initial phases in each term of (H9c). The second sum in (H9c) will be split into two subsums, one corresponding to p ′ 6= p , another to p ′ = p : Wl Al0p′q′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin( − 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 − (ωl0p′q′ + ωl0pq ) t + ǫl0pq ) Ul = Almp′q′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin( 2 (p − p ′) ω0 + (ωlmp′q′ − ωlmpq ) t + ǫlmpq ) Almpq′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin ( (q ′ − q) n t + ǫlmpq ) + . . . (H9d) H.2. Selection of secular terms in (H9d). The role of rheology The purpose of the below-presented algebraic development of (H9d) is to single out secular terms, i.e., the ones whose time average vanishes. Involvement of time averages immediately brings in rheological properties of the tidally perturbed body. Indeed, the averaging remains legitimate over so long a time scale as keeps the rheological response linear, not plastic. Very roughly, we may link the borderline to the Maxwell time of the mantle, τM . If the period of the apsidal motion is shorter than τM or, at least, does not exceed it by more than an order or two, we have to keep the apsidal rate ω in the expression Ul over the (5) for the Fourier mode and, accordingly, have to average the product Wl apsidal period. If however the apsidal timescale exceeds τM considerably, then averaging of Ul over such a time scale will lack physical meaning, and the apsidal rate the product Wl in the expression (5) should be set zero. As we shall see below, this will make difference in our further selection of the secular parts of the first two subsums in (H9d). H.2.1. Symmetrisation Processing the third subsum in (H9d) is easy: we retain the secular terms (those with q = q ′ ) and, in anticipation of time averaging, ignore the rest of the subsum. The second subsum in (H9d) can be split into two equal halves, with pq and p ′q ′ swapped in the second half: 1 2 Xm Xp , p ′ p ′6=p Xq , q ′ Almp ′q ′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin( 2 (p − p ′) ω0 + (ωlmp ′q ′ − ωlmpq ) t + ǫlmpq ) = -- 48 -- 1 1 4 X h Almp ′q ′ ωlmpq Blmpq sin( 2 (p − p ′) ω0 + (ωlmp ′q ′ − ωlmpq ) t + ǫlmpq ) + Almpq ωlmp ′q ′ Blmp ′q ′ sin( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 + (ωlmpq − ωlmp ′q ′ ) t + ǫlmp ′q ′ )i = (H10a) 4 X h Almp ′q ′ ωlmpq Almpq kl(ωlmpq) sin( 2 (p − p ′) ω0 + (ωlmp ′q ′ − ωlmpq ) t + ǫlmpq ) + Almpq ωlmp ′q ′ Almp ′q ′ kl(ωlmp ′q ′) sin( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 + (ωlmpq − ωlmp ′q ′ ) t + ǫlmp ′q ′ )i . (H10b) Prior to time averaging of (H10), we, generally, have ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq) 6= ωlmp ′q ′ kl(ωlmp ′q ′) and ǫlmpq 6= ǫlmp ′q ′ . The averaging, however, leaves us only the terms with ωlmpq = ωlmp ′q ′ . Hence the secular part of the above expression is: 1 = ω lmpq lmp ′q ′ ωlmpq Blmpq [ sin(2 (p − p ′) ω0 + ǫlmpq) + sin( −2 (p − p ′) ω0 + ǫlmpq) ] 4Xm Xp , p ′ p ′6=p = [ Almp ′q ′ ] ω Xq 2 Xm Xp , p ′ 1 p ′6=p [ Almp ′q ′ ] ωlmpq = ωlmp ′ q ′ ωlmpq Blmpq cos( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫlmpq . Xq where the value of q ′ is defined by the fact that the secular terms obey 0 = ωlmpq − ωlmp ′q ′ = − 2 (p − p ′) ω + [− 2 (p − p ′) + q − q ′ ] n . (H12) Similarly to (H10), the first subsum in (H9d) can be rewritten as (−1) l 2 Xp ′, q ′ Xp, q Al0p ′q ′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin( − 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 − (ωl0p ′q ′ + ωl0pq ) t + ǫl0pq ) = (−1) l 4 Xp , p ′ Xq , q ′ h Al0p ′q ′ ωl0pq Bl0pq sin( − 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 − (ωl0p′q′ + ωl0pq ) t + ǫl0pq ) + Al0pq ωl0p ′q ′ Bl0p ′q ′ sin( − 2 (l − p − p ′) ω0 − (ωl0pq + ωl0p ′q ′ ) t + ǫl0p ′q ′)i = (H13a) (−1) l 4 Xp , p ′ Xq , q ′ h Al0p ′q ′ ωl0pq Al0pq kl(ωl0pq) sin( − 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 − (ωl0p′q′ + ωl0pq) t + ǫl0pq ) + Al0pq ωl0p ′q ′ Al0p ′q ′ kl(ωl0p ′q ′) sin( − 2 (l − p − p ′) ω0 − (ωl0pq + ωl0p ′q ′ ) t + ǫl0p ′q ′)i . (H13b) -- 49 -- After time-averaging of (H13b), the factor ωl0p ′q ′ accompanying the second sine becomes − ωl0pq , while ǫl0p ′q ′ becomes − ǫl0pq . Hence the secular part of the above expression is: (−1) l 2 Xp , p ′ ωl0pq Bl0pq cos( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫl0pq Xq ωl0pq = − ωl0p ′q ′ [Al0p ′q ′] , (H14) p ′6=p where the value of q ′ is determined from the condition of the terms being secular: 0 = ωlmpq + ωlmp ′q ′ = 2 (l − p − p ′) ω + [ 2 (l − p − p ′) + q + q ′ ] n . (H15) H.2.2. The case of a quiescent pericentre When the period of the apsidal motion is much (by orders of magnitude) longer than the Maxwell time τM , we cannot count on a linear tidal response at such long time scales. Instead, we should treat the pericentre as fixed and should nullify ω in the expression (5) for the Fourier mode, as well as in (H12) and (H15). From (H11) and (H12), we see that the time average of the second subsum in (H9d) acquires the form of 1 2 Xm Xp , p ′ p ′6=p [ Almp ′q ′ ] q ′ = q−2(p−p ′) ωlmpq Blmpq cos( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫlmpq . (H16) Xq From (H14) and (H15), we infer that the average of the first subsum in (H9d) is (−1) l 2 Xp , p ′ Xq [Al0p ′q ′] q ′ = −q−2(l−p−p ′) ωl0pq Bl0pq cos( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫl0pq . (H17) Altogether, the secular part of the expression (H9d) acquires the form of ( ω=0) h Wl Ul i = + + 1 (−1) l 2 Xp q Xp ′ 2 Xm Xp q Xp ′6=p 2 Xm Xpq 1 [Al0p ′q ′] q ′ = −q−2(l−p−p ′) ωl0pq Bl0pq cos( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫl0pq [ Almp ′q ′ ] q ′ =q−2(p−p ′) ωlmpq Blmpq cos( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫlmpq Almpq ωlmpq Blmpq sin ǫlmpq + . . . , (H18a) -- 50 -- where the last two sums may now be reunited into one: ( ω=0) h Wl Ul i = + (−1) l 2 Xp p ′ q 2 Xm Xp p ′ q 1 [Al0p ′q ′] q ′=−q−2(l−p−p ′) ωl0pq Bl0pq cos( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫl0pq [Almp ′q ′] q ′ =q−2(p−p ′) ωlmpq Blmpq cos( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) sin ǫlmpq + . . . , (H18b) the ellipsis denoting the terms which will vanish after integration over the longitude λ . H.2.3. The case of a moving pericentre Consider a situation where the evolution rate of the pericentre is relatively fast, i.e., not much slower than the Maxwell timescale of the mantle material. In this situation, the time derivative ω should be taken into account in the expression for the Fourier tidal modes. Just as in the case of an idle pericentre, here we begin with the second subsum in (H9d). As we saw above, its secular part can be transformed into the expression (H11), where the index q ′ is no longer independent but is constrained by the condition (H12). For a vanishing ω , that condition became q ′ = q − 2 (p − p ′) , thus making the secular part look as (H16). Now the situation is different, and the equality q ′ = q − 2 (p − p ′) no longer ensues from (H12). There, though, is an alternative method of satisfying (H12). For a chosen set of integers {p, p ′, q, q ′} , it is possible to pick up commensurate values of ω and n , obeying q − q ′ 2 (p − p ′) 2 (p − p ′) − (q − q ′) = − 1 + ω n = − 2 (p − p ′) . (H19) This equality will then be true also for any set {Kp, Kp ′, Kq, Kq ′} with a nonzero integer K . We should not, however, accept the formulae at their face value, but should always keep in mind the physical meaning of the orbital elements of our concern. While formally solution of a perturbed Keplerian problem does not prohibit the pericentre rate from being comparable to n , such a proximity is unlikely to be attained in real life -- except in the situations where an orbit is undegoing a rapid and considerable change. Usually, ω is much smaller in absolute value than n . Therefore, (q−q ′)/(2(p−p ′)) should be very close to, but not exactly equal to 1 . There are no combinations of integers to make this happen, because 2(p − p ′) takes values between −2 l and 2 l , so the smallest absolute value of the ratio (q − q ′)/(2(p − p ′)) is 1/(2 l) . For l = 2 , this would make (H19) look ω /n = − 3/4 , while for a larger l the ratio ω /n would be even closer to unity, a situation irrelevant to actual settings. Therefore, the entire second subsum in (H9d) must drop out. -- 51 -- Consider the first subsum in (H9d). As we saw, its secular part can be transformed into the expression (H14), where the index q ′ is constrained by the condition (H15). For a vanishing ω , the condition used to entail q ′ = − q − 2(l − p − p ′) , so the secular part used to assume the form (H17). This will no longer be so in the presence of ω . We then have two ways of satisfying the condition (H15). One is to impose, simultaneously, the conditions in which case the secular part of the discussed subsum will be simplified to l = p + p ′ , q = − q ′ , (−1) l 2 Xp q [Al0p ′q ′] l=p ′+p q ′ = −q ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ǫl0pq . (H20) (H21) Another way is to pick up, for some set {l, p, p ′, q, q ′} , commensurate ω and n obeying ω n = − 1 − q + q ′ 2 (l − p − p ′) . (H22) This will work also for any set {Kl, Kp, Kp ′, Kq, Kq ′} with a nonzero integer K. Just as in the formula (H19), this option is not viable, as no set {l, p, p ′, q, q ′} makes the pericentre rate much lower than n . So the only realistic possibility is implemented by (H20 - H21). All in all, the secular part of the expression (H9d) acquires the form ( ω6=0) Uli = hWl (−1) l 2 Xp q [Al0p ′q ′] l=p ′+p q ′ = −q ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ǫl0pq + 1 2 Xm Xp q Almpq ωlmpq Blmpq sin ǫlmpq + . . . , (H23) the ellipsis signifying the part vanishing after integration over the longitude λ . H.2.4. Comparison of the two cases Comparing formulae (H18b) and (H23), we see that a whole group of terms, absent in the moving-pericentre case, shows up when the pericentre stays idle. These are the terms obtained by summation over p ′ . When averaging over the apsidal period is legitimate, most of them vanish and the value of p ′ gets fixed. Otherwise these terms stay. As we explained above, averaging is physically meaningful over timescales which do not exceed the Maxwell time by too many orders of magnitude. Over longer periods, linear viscoelastic reaction is not guaranteed. Specifically, we cannot be sure that full rebound is -- 52 -- possible. At such long times, it would be physical to regard the periapse idle -- which will change the averaging procedure and will leave unaveraged the terms numbered with all p ′ . To understand whether the periapse should be regarded quiescent or not, its period must be compared with the Maxwell time. The latter is shorter (and may thus fall short of the apsidal period) at higher temperatures. So for heated-up planets the periapse may have to be regarded as idle, thus giving birth to the p ′ 6= p terms and making the heat production more intensive. H.3. The low-inclination approximation A considerable simplification becomes available if we agree to omit the O(i2) terms. To appreciate this, examine the expressions for the inclination functions Flmp(i) . For l = 2 , we have: F201(i) = − 1 2 + O(i2) , F220(i) = 3 + O(i2) , the other F2mp(i) being of the order of i or higher. Moreover, as the functions F200(i) and F202(i) are of the order of i2 , the only relevant product with m = 0 is the diagonal one: 201(i) = 1/4 + O(i2) , the cross products F20p ′(i) F20p(i) being O(i2) . Similarly, since F 2 F221(i) and F222(i) are of the order of i2 or higher, the only relevant product with m = 2 is diagonal: F 2 220(i) = 9 + O(i2) , Performing the same check for l = 3 , we write down: F311(i) = − 3 2 + O(i2) , F330(i) = 15 + O(i2) , and notice that the other F3mp(i) are of the order of i or higher. Above that, as the functions F310(i) , F312(i) , and F313(i) are of the order of i2 or higher, the only surviving product with m = 1 is the diagonal one, F 2 311(i) = 9/4 + O(i2) , the cross products being O(i2) . By the same token, since F331(i) , F332(i) , and F333(i) are of the order of i2 or higher, the only remaining term with m = 3 is diagonal: F 2 330(i) = 225 + O(i2) . A similar examination of the functions with l = 4 demonstrates that only the diagonal terms F 2 402(i) , F 2 421(i) , and F 2 440(i) survive, the cross terms being O(i2) or higher-order. We have performed this check for all l ≤ 7 , and made sure that only the p ′ = p terms exceed O(i2) . As the terms with l > 7 are unlikely to play any role in practical calculations -- 53 -- ever, 29 we stop our check here and reduce our sum to the diagonal ( p ′ = p ) terms only. Then, for a quiescent pericentre, the secular part of (H9d) will be: ( ω=0) h Wl Ul i = + (−1) l 2 Xp q 2 Xm Xpq 1 [Al0pq ′] q ′ = −q−2(l−2p) ωl0pq Bl0pq cos( 2 (l − 2 p) ω0 ) sin ǫl0pq Almpq ωlmpq Blmpq sin ǫlmpq + . . . , (H24) For a moving pericentre, the secular part of (H9d) will assume the form of ( ω6=0) Uli = hWl (−1) l 2 Xp q [Al0pq ′] p=l/2 q ′ = −q ωl0pq Bl0pq sin ǫl0pq + 1 2 Xm Xp q Almpq ωlmpq Blmpq sin ǫlmpq + . . . . (H25) Recall that the ellipsis denotes the part vanishing after integration over the longitude. In the first sum, the condition p = l/2 means that the first sum is nil for odd values of l. The formulae (H24) and (H25) have been derived here for reference purposes solely. While they enable one to write down much shorter expressions for the tidal dissipation rate, below we shall write the expressions which are general and can be used for an arbitrary i . H.4. The dissipation rate H.4.1. The case of a quiescent pericentre Insertion of the formulae (H3), (H7) and (H18b) into the equation (61b) gives us the damping rate in the case when the pericentre is fixed and no averaging over the apsidal period is required: h P i = 1 4πGR Xl (2l + 1) Z dS DWl UlE = 29 Each product Almp ′q ′ Blmpq is proportional to (R/a)2l , and an extra factor of R/a will show up later, when we plug everything into the expression for heat production rate. Indeed, integration over the surface will give us a factor of R2 in (H27). Then the overall multiplier 1/(4πGR) standing in (61b) must be taken into account. All together, this leaves us with an extra R , thus making the final expression for dissipation rate proportional to (R/a)2l+1 . 1 4πGR (cid:18)G M ∗ a (cid:19)2 ∞ Xl=2 -- 54 -- 2 l( (−1) l (2l + 1) (cid:18)R a(cid:19) 2 l l Xp=0 Xp ′=0 Fl0p(i) Fl0p ′(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = − q − 2 (l−p−p ′) ωl0pq kl(ωl0pq ) sin ǫl(ωl0pq) cos ( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 )Z dS [ Pl0(sin φ) ]2 ( 2 − δ0m ) (cid:21) Flmp ′(i) Flmp(i) Glpq(e) ∞ 2 Xq =−∞ l Xp ′=0 + 1 2 l Xm=0 (cid:20) (l − m)! (l + m)! l Xp=0 [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = q − 2 (p−p ′) cos ( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) Z dS [ Pl m(sin φ) ]2(cid:27) . (H26) Using the normalisation (A3b) and recalling that dS = R2 cos φ dφ dλ , write the integral as Z dS [ Pl m(sin φ) ]2 = R2 2 π 2 2l + 1 (l + m)! (l − m)! , (H27) whence h P i = 2 l + 1( (−1) l δ0m G M ∗ 2 2 a ∞ Xl=2 (cid:18)R a(cid:19) l l Xp=0 Xp ′=0 Flmp(i) Flmp ′(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = − q − 2 (l−p−p ′) cos ( 2 (l − p ′ − p) ω0 ) + l Xm=0 (l − m)! (l + m)! ( 2 − δ0m )2 Flmp(i) l Xp=0 l Xp ′=0 Flmp ′(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = q − 2 (p−p ′) cos ( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) ) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq) . (H28) The expression will be simplified considerably, if we notice that the first sum in the curly brackets can be absorbed by the second sum. To appreciate this, introduce auxiliary integers p ≡ l − p ′ and q ≡ − q ′ . (H29) -- 55 -- Just as p ′ , the integer p assumes the values from 0 through l . Like q ′ , the integer q runs from −∞ to ∞ . In terms of p and q , the first sum becomes (−1) l δ0m l l Xp=0 Xp=0 Flmp(i) Flm(l−p)(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) (cid:2) Gl(l−p)(−q)(e)(cid:3)q = q − 2 (p − p) cos (2(p − p) ω0 ) (H30a) = δ0m l l Xp=0 Xp=0 Flmp(i) Flmp(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) [ Gl pq(e) ] q = q − 2 (p − p) cos (2(p − p) ω0 ) , (H30b) where we made use of the relations 30 and Glpq(e) = Gl(l−p)(−q)(e) , Flmp(i) = (−1)l−m Flm(l−p)(π − i) Fl0p(i) = Fl0p(π − i) . (H32) (H33) (H34) Evidently, (H30b) is equal to the m = 0 part of the second sum in the curly brackets in (H28). Denoting p with p ′ (which is legitimate, as these are just dummy indices), we can absorb the expression (H30b) into the second sum. The outcome is: h P i = G M ∗ 2 a 2 l + 1 ∞ Xl=2 (cid:18)R a(cid:19) l Xm=0 (l − m)! (l + m)! ( 2 − δ0m ) Flmp(i) l Xp=0 l Xp ′=0 Flmp ′(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ Glpq(e) [ Glp ′q ′(e) ] q ′ = q − 2 (p−p ′) cos ( 2 (p ′ − p) ω0 ) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq) . (H35) 30 The equality (H32) is borrowed from Giacaglia (1976a, eqn. 23), while (H33) comes from Gooding & Wagner (2008, eqn 10). The formula (H34) stems from the integral expression (e.g., Giacaglia 1976b, eqn 4) Flmp(i) = 1 2 π Z π −π P m l (sin φ) e i [mλ − (l−2p)u] du . (H31) -- 56 -- H.4.2. The case of a uniformly moving pericentre Similarly to the above, insertion of the equations (H23), (H3) and (H7) into the formula (61b) will give us the heating rate in the case when the pericentre is moving and our time averaging includes that over the apsidal period: h P i = 1 4πGR Xl (2l + 1) Z dS DWl UlE = 1 4πGR (cid:18)G M ∗ a (cid:19)2 ∞ Xl=2 2 l( (−1) l (2l + 1) (cid:18) R a(cid:19) 2 l Xp=0 F 2 l0p(i) (−1)l ∞ Xq =−∞ G 2 lpq(e) ωl0pq kl(ωl0pq) sin ǫl(ωl0pq ) Z dS [ Pl0(sin φ) ]2 + 1 2 l Xm=0 (cid:20) (l − m)! (l + m)! 2 ( 2 − δ0m ) (cid:21) l Xp=0 F 2 lmp(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ G 2 lpq(e) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) Z dS [ Pl m(sin φ) ]2 ) , (H36) where we also employed the equalities (H32 - H34). Further insertion of (H27) leads us to: h P i = G M ∗ 2 2 a ∞ Xq =−∞ G 2 lpq(e)(cid:20)δ0m + (l − m)! (l + m)! 2 l + 1 l l ∞ F 2 lmp(i) Xp=0 Xm=0 Xl=2 (cid:18) R a (cid:19) (2 − δ0m)2(cid:21) ωlmpq kl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq) = (H37a) 2l+1 G M ∗ 2 a ∞ Xl=2 (cid:18)R a(cid:19) l Xm=0 l Xp=0 F 2 lmp(i) ∞ Xq =−∞ G 2 lpq(e) (l − m)! (l + m)! (2 − δ0m) ωlmpqkl(ωlmpq ) sin ǫl(ωlmpq) . (H37b) It would be instructive to compare this expression with the corresponding result from the classical paper by Peale and Cassen (1978). To this end, three items must be kept in mind. -- 57 -- 1. The authors of Ibid. tacitly assumed that averaging should be carried out not only over the tidal period but also over the apsidal period -- this can be understood from how their formulae (21) transformed into (22). This is why their resulting formula (31) is appropriate to compare with our expression (H37b). 2. As the derivation in Ibid. was intended for the incompressible case and for l = 2 solely, we should use, for the purpose of comparison, the equality k2(ω2mpq ) = 3h2(ω2mpq )/5 derived in Appendix F. 3. In Ibid., only the case of synchronous rotation was addressed, with ω2mpq = (2 − 2p) ω + (2 − 2p + q) n + m ( Ω − θ) ≈ (2 − 2p + q − m) n , where n is the apparent mean motion of the perturber. Librations were ignored. Taking all this into account, we write, for the purpose of comparison, an appropriately simplified version of our expression (H37b): (synchronous) (incompress) l=2 = h P i G M ∗ 2 a (cid:18) R a(cid:19) 2l+1 2 2 ∞ F 2 2mp(i) Xm=0 Xp=0 Xq =−∞ G 2 2pq(e) (2 − m)! (2 + m)! (2 − δ0m) ω2mpq 3 5 h2(ω2mpq ) sin ǫ2(ω2mpq ) . (H38) As the time lag in our formula (13a) is always positive-definite, the sign of the phase lag ǫl(ωlmpq ) coincides with that of the tidal mode ωlmpq , wherefore the product ωlmpq sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) can always be written down as a product of absolute values: ωlmpq sin ǫl(ωlmpq) = ωlmpq · sin ǫl(ωlmpq) = χlmpq Qlmpq , (H39) where 1 Qlmpq ≡ sin ǫl(ωlmpq) is the inverse quality factor, while χlmpq ≡ ωlmpq is the positive-definite physical forcing frequency. For synchronous spin and l = 2 , the forcing frequency is χ2mpq ≈ 2 − 2 p + q − m n , whence the quadrupole input into the power is: (synchronous) (incompress) h P i l=2 = G M ∗ 2 a (cid:18) R a(cid:19) 2l+1 2 2 ∞ F 2 2mp(i) Xm=0 Xp=0 Xq =−∞ with an absolute value in the numerator. G 2 2pq(e) (2 − m)! (2 + m)! (2 − δ0m) 3 5 h2 2 − 2p + q − m Q2mpq n , (H40) Peale & Cassen (1978) had in their formula (31) simply ( 2 − 2 p +q −m ) instead of 2 − 2 p + q − m . Nonetheless, their result was correct, because they were using a nonstandard convention 1/Qlmpq = sin ǫl(ωlmpq) wherein the inverse quality factors incorporated the signs of the lags and, thus, were not positive definite. -- 58 -- REFERENCES Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.) 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, p. 332. The National Bureau of Standards, Gaithesburg MD Arfken, G. B., and Weber, H. J. 1995. Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press, Boston 1995, p. 723 Bills, B.G.; Neumann, G.A.; Smith, D.E.; and Zuber, M.T. 2005. "Improved estimate of tidal dissipation within Mars from MOLA observations of the shadow of Phobos." Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 110, pp. 2376 - 2406 Brouwer, D., and G. M. Clemence. 1961. Methods of Celestial Mechanics. Academic Press, NY & London. Churkin, V. A. 1998. "The Love numbers for the models of inelastic Earth." Preprint No 121. Institute of Applied Astronomy. St.Petersburg, Russia. /in Russian/ Dahlen, F. A., and Tromp, J. 1998. Theoretical Global Seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1998. Darwin, G. H. 1879. "On the precession of a viscous spheroid and on the remote history of the Earth", Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 170, pp. 447 - 530 Efroimsky, M. 2012 a. "Bodily tides near spin-orbit resonances." Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 112, pp. 283 - 330. Extended version: http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.6086 Efroimsky, M. 2012 b. "Tidal dissipation compared to seismic dissipation: in small bod- id. 150. ies, earths, and superearths." The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 746, http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3936 ERRATA: ApJ, Vol. 763, id. 150 (2013) Efroimsky, M., & Makarov, V. V. 2013. "Tidal Friction and Tidal Lagging. Applicability Limitations of a Popular Formula for the Tidal Torque" The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 764, http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1615 id. 26. Ferrers, N. M. 1877. An Elementary Treatise on Spherical Harmonics and Subjects Connected with them. Macmillan & Co, London, p. 76 Giacaglia, G.E.O. 1976 a. "A note on Hansen's coefficients in satellite theory." Celeastail Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 14, pp. 515 - 523. -- 59 -- Giacaglia, G.E.O. 1976 b. "A note on the inclination functions of satellite theory." Celeastail Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 14, pp. 503 - 509. Gooding, R.H., & Wagner, C.A. 2008. "On the inclination functions and a rapid stable procedure for their evaluation together with derivatives." Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 101, pp. 247 - 272. Kaula, W. M. 1961. "Analysis of Gravitational and Geometric Aspects of Geodetic Utilisation of Satellites." The Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 5, pp. 104 - 133 Kaula, W. M. 1964. "Tidal Dissipation by Solid Friction and the Resulting Orbital Evolu- tion." Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 2, pp. 661 - 684 Kaula, W. M. 1966. Theory of Satellite Geodesy. Blaisdell, Waltham MA. Kaula, W. M. 1968. An Introduction to Planetary Physics. John Wiley and Sons, NY. Legros, H.; Greff, M.; and Tokieda, T. 2006. "Physics inside the Earth. Deformation and Rotation." Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 682, pp. 23 - 66. Springer, Heidelberg. MacDonald, G. J. F. 1964. "Tidal Friction." Reviews of Geophysics. Vol. 2, pp. 467 - 541. Makarov, V. V. 2013. "Why is the Moon synchronously rotating?" Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. Vol. 434, pp. L21-L25 Makarov, V. V., & Efroimsky, M. 2013. "No pseudosynchronous rotation for terrestrial plan- ets and moons." The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 764, http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1616 id. 27 Makarov, V. V., & Efroimsky, M. 2014. "Tidal dissipation in a homogeneous spherical body. II. Examples: Io, Mercury, and Kepler-10 b." The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 795, id. 7 http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2352 Melchior, P. 1972. Physique et dynamique plan´etaires. Volume 3: G´eodynamique. Vander, Bruxelles. Peale, S. J.; Cassen, P. 1978. "Contribution of tidal dissipation to lunar thermal history." Icarus, Vol. 36, pp. 245 - 269 Platzman, G. W. 1984. "Planetary Energy Balance for Tidal Dissipation." Reviews of Geo- physics and Space Physics, Vol. 22, pp. 73 - 84 -- 60 -- Segatz, M., Spohn, T., Ross, M. N., & Schubert, G. 1988. "Tidal dissipation, surface heat flow, and figure of viscoelastic models of Io." Icarus, Vol. 75, pp. 187 - 206 Taylor, P. A.., and Margot, J.-L. 2010. "Tidal evolution of close binary asteroid systems." Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 108, pp. 315 - 338 Touma, J., and Wisdom, J. 1994. "Evolution of the Earth-Moon System." The Astronomical Journal 108, pp. 1943 - 1961 Vallado, D. A. 2007. Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications. Third Edition. Mi- crocosm Press and Springer. Wang, R. 1997. "Tidal response of the solid earth." In: Tidal Phenomena, Ed. by H. Wilhelm, W. Zurn, and H.-G. Wenzel. Springer, Berlin 1997, pp. 183 - 218. ISBN 3540628339 Winch, D. E., Ivers, D. J., Turner, J. P. R., & Stening, R. J. 2005. "Geomagnetism and Schmidt quasi-normalisation." Geophysical J. International, Vol. 160, pp. 487 - 504 Zschau, J., 1978. "Tidal friction in the solid Earth: Loading tides versus body tides." In: P. Brosche and J. Sundermann (Eds.), Tidal Friction and the Earth's Rotation., p. 62-94. Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielfeld, on 26 - 30 Sept 1977. 243 pp., Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1978 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 61 -- Table 1. Symbol key Notation Description r ∗ r ∗ φ ∗ λ ∗ R r R r φ λ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the position of the star relative to the centre of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the star-planet distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the declination of the star relative to the equator of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . the right ascension of the star relative to a fixed meridian on the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a point on the surface of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a point outside the planet, located above the surface point R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the radius of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . distance from the centre of the planet to an exterior point r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the latitude of the point R on the surface of the planet (also the declination of an exterior point r located above the surface point R) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the longitude of a point R on the surface of the planet (also the right ascension of an exterior point r located above the surface point R) W (R, r ∗) Wl(R, r ∗) U(r, r ∗) Ul(r, r ∗) V 0 V ′ V ωlmpq χlmpq χ M M ∗ a e i ω ω Ω . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tide-raising potential at a surface point R of the planet . . . . the l-degree part of the tide-raising potential at a surface point R of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . additional tidal potential in a point r outside the planet . . . the l-degree part of the additional tidal potential in a point r outside the planet . . . . . the constant-in-time spherically symmetrical potential of an undeformed planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the total perturbation of the potential of the planet ( V ′ = W + U ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the overall potential of the planet ( V = V 0 + V ′ = V 0 + W + U ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the Fourier modes of the tide . . . . . . . . the physical frequencies of the tidal stresses and strains ( χlmpq = ωlmpq ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a shorter notation for χlmpq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the mass of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the mass of the star . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the semimajor axis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the eccentricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the obliquity (the inclination of the star as seen from the planet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the argument of the pericentre of the star as seen from the planet . . . . . . when there is no risk of confusion, ω is also used as a short notation for ωlmpq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the longitude of the node of the star as seen from the planet -- 62 -- Table 1 -- Continued Notation Description M n G θ (cid:5) θ kl, hl kl(ωlmpq), hl(ωlmpq) ǫl(ωlmpq ) ∆tl(ωlmpq ) Ql(ωlmpq ) Qlmpq Flmp(i) Glpq(e) µ J J ρ g u v P hPi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the mean anomaly of the star as seen from the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the mean motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Newton's gravitational constant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the rotation angle of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the spin rate of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the degree-l static Love numbers of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the degree-l dynamical Love numbers of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the degree-l tidal phase lag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the degree-l tidal time lag . .the degree-l tidal quality factor defined as Ql(ωlmpq) ≡ 1/ sin ǫl(ωlmpq ) the Q factor, in the notation of Kaula (1964) and Peale & Cassen (1978) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the inclination functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the eccentricity polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the mean rigidity of the mantle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .the mean compliance of the mantle ( J = 1/µ ) . . . . . . . . . . when there is no risk of confusion, J also denotes the Jacobian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the mean density of the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the surface gravity on the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tidal displacement in the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the velocity of tidal displacement in the planet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the power exerted on the planet by the tidal stresses . the time-averaged power (averaged over one or several cycles of flexure)
0906.2590	2	0906	2009-07-21T13:58:57	Effects of Mutual Transits by Extrasolar Planet-Companion Systems on Light Curves	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	We consider the effects of mutual transits by extrasolar planet-companion systems (in a true binary or a planet-satellite system) on light curves. We show that induced changes in light curves depend strongly on a ratio between a planet-companion's orbital velocity around their host star and a planet-companion's spin speed around their common center of mass. In both the slow and fast spin cases (corresponding to long and short distances between them, respectively), a certain asymmetry appears in light curves. We show that, especially in the case of short distances, occultation of one faint object by the other, while the transit of the planet-companion system occurs in front of its parent star, causes an apparent increase in light curves and characteristic fluctuations appear as important evidence of mutual transits. We show also that extrasolar mutual transits provide a complementary method of measuring the radii of two transiting objects, their separation and mass, and consequently identifying them as a true binary, planet-satellite system or others. Monitoring $10^5$ stars for three years with Kepler may lead to a discovery of a second Earth-Moon-like system if the fraction of such systems for an averaged star is larger than 0.05, or it may put upper limits on the fraction as f < 0.05.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Effects of Mutual Transits by Extrasolar Planet-Companion Systems on Light Curves Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8561 Masanao Sato, and Hideki Asada (Received ; accepted ) Abstract We consider the effects of mutual transits by extrasolar planet-companion systems (in a true binary or a planet-satellite system) on light curves. We show that induced changes in light curves depend strongly on a ratio between a planet-companion's orbital velocity around their host star and a planet-companion's spin speed around their common center of mass. In both the slow and fast spin cases (corresponding to long and short distances between them, respectively), a certain asymmetry appears in light curves. We show that, especially in the case of short distances, occultation of one faint object by the other, while the transit of the planet-companion system occurs in front of its parent star, causes an apparent increase in light curves and characteristic fluctuations appear as important evidence of mutual transits. We show also that extrasolar mutual transits provide a complementary method of measuring the radii of two transiting objects, their separation and mass, and consequently identifying them as a true binary, planet-satellite system or others. Monitoring 105 stars for three years with Kepler may lead to a discovery of a second Earth-Moon-like system if the fraction of such systems for an averaged star is larger than 0.05, or it may put upper limits on the fraction as f < 0.05. Key words: techniques: photometric -- eclipses -- occultations -- planets and satellites: general -- stars: planetary systems 9 0 0 2 l u J 1 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 0 9 5 2 . 6 0 9 0 : v i X r a 1. Introduction It is of general interest to discover a second Earth-Moon system. Detections of extra- solar planet-satellite or binary planet systems will bring important information to planet (and satellite) formation theory (e.g., Jewitt and Sheppard 2005, Canup and Ward 2006, Jewitt and Haghighipour 2007). It is not clear whether the IAU definition for planets in the solar system can be applied to extrasolar planets as it is. The IAU definition in 2006 is as follows. A planet is a celestial 1 body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. We call a gravitationally bound system of two extrasolar planet-size objects simply as extrasolar binary planets. They constitute a true binary if the following conditions are satisfied instead of (c) in addition to the two criteria (a) with replacing the Sun by a host star and (b). (c1) Their total mass is dominant in the neighborhood around their orbits. (c2) Their common center of mass is above their surfaces. If it is below a surface of one object, one may call them an extrasolar planet-satellite. There have been theoretical works on the existence of planets with satellites. The solar system's outer gaseous planets have multiple satellites, each of which notably has a similar fraction (∼ 10−4) of their respective planet's mass. For instance, Canup and Ward (2006) found that the mass fraction is regulated to ∼ 10−4 by a balance between two competing processes of the material inflow to the satellites and the satellite loss through orbital decay driven by the gas. They suggested that similar processes could limit the largest satellite of extrasolar giant planets. Such theoretical predictions await future observational tests. There still remains a possibility of detecting Jupiter-size binary planets with comparable masses. Furthermore, we should note that their model does not hold for solid planets. It may be possible to detect binary solid planets (perhaps Earth-size ones). Therefore, future detection of extrasolar planet-companion systems or a larger mass fraction (> 10−4) of satellites around gaseous exoplanets will give definite information on the planet and satellite formation theory. In any case, unexpected findings will open the possibility of new configurations such as binary planets. Recent direct imaging of a planetary mass ∼ 8MJ with an apparent separation of 330 AU from the parent star (Lafreni`ere et al. 2008) indicates the likely existence of long-period exoplanets (> 1000 yr). In this paper, we consider such exoplanets as well as close ones. Since the first detection of a transiting extrasolar planet (Charbonneau et al. 2000), photometric techniques have been successful (e.g., Deming, Seager, Richardson, Harrington 2005 for probing atmosphere, Ohta et al. 2005, Winn et al. 2005, Gaudi & Winn 2007, Narita et al. 2007, 2008 for measuring stellar spins). In addition to COROT1, Kepler2 has been very recently launched. It will monitor about 105 stars with expected 10 ppm (= 10−5) photometric differential sensitivity. This enables the detection of a Moon-size object. Sartoretti and Schneider (1999) first suggested a photometric detection of extrasolar satellites. Cabrera and Schneider (2007) developed a method based on the imaging of a planet- companion as an unresolved system (but resolved from its host star) by using planet-companion mutual transits and mutual shadows. As an alternative method, timing offsets for a single eclipse have been investigated for eclipsing binary stars as a perturbation of transiting planets around the center of mass in the presence of the third body (Deeg et al. 1998, 2000, Doyle 1 http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/COROT/ 2 http://kepler.nasa.gov/ 2 et al. 2000). It has been recently extended toward detecting "exomoons" (Szab´o, Szatm´ary, Div´eki, Simon 2006, Simon, Szatm´ary, Szab´o, 2007, Kipping 2009a, 2009b). The purpose of the present paper is to investigate effects of mutual transits by extrasolar planet-companion systems on light curves, especially how the effects depend on their spin velocity relative to their orbital one around their parent star. Furthermore, we shall discuss extrasolar mutual transits as a complementary method of measuring the system's parameters such as a planet-companion's separation and thereby of identifying them as a true binary, planet-satellite system or others. Our treatment is applicable both to a true binary and to a planet-satellite system. Our method has analogies in classical ones for eclipsing binaries (e.g., Binnendijk 1960, Aitken 1964). A major difference is that occultation of one faint object by the other transiting a parent star causes an apparent increase in light curves, whereas eclipsing binaries make a decrease. What is more important is that, in both cases where one faint object transits the other and vice versa, changes are made in the light curves due to mutual transits even if no light emissions come from the faint objects. In a single transit, on the other hand, thermal emissions from a transiting object at lower temperature make a difference in light curves during the secondary eclipse, when the object moves behind a parent star as observed for instance for HD209458b (Deming et al. 2005). Let us briefly mention transits/occultations in the solar system. It is possible that the Moon or another celestial body occult multiple celestial bodies at the same time. Such mutual occultations are extremely rare and can be seen only from a small part of the world. The last event was on 23rd of April, 1998, when the Moon occulted the Venus and Jupiter simultaneously for observers on Ascension Island. Such an event is extremely rare because it is controlled by three different orbital periods of the Moon, Venus and Jupiter and hence the probability of the alignment of the three objects is very low. In the case of planet-companion systems, on the other hand, orbital periods around a host star are common for the two objects. Therefore, the number of time scales controling extrasolar mutual transits are two; the orbital period around the host star and the planet- companion's spin period. As a result, extrasolar mutual transits (with one planet occasionally transiting or occulting the other) across a parent star, can occur more frequently than mutual occultations in our solar system. This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we consider mutual transits of extrasolar planet-companion systems in orbit around their host star. Event rates and possible bounds are also discussed. Section 3 is devoted to the conclusion. 3 2. Mutual Transits of Extrasolar Planet-companion Systems 2.1. Approximations and notation For simplicity, we assume that the orbital plane of a planet-companion system orbiting around its common center of mass (COM) is the same as that of the COM in orbit around the host star with radius R. This co-planar assumption is reasonable because it seems that planets are born from fragmentations of a single proto-stellar disk and thus their spins and orbital angular momentum are nearly parallel to the spin axis of the disk. Inclination angles of the orbital plane with respect to our line of sight are chosen as 90 degrees, because transiting planets can be observed only for (nearly) the edge-on case. In order to show clearly our idea, the binaries are in circular motion as an approximation by (c1). It is straightforward to extend to elliptic motions. For investigating transits, we need the transverse position x and velocity v. We denote those of the COM for planet-companion systems as xCM and vCM , respectively, where the origin of x is chosen as the center of the star. The position and velocity of each planet with mass m1 and m2 in the binary system with separation a are denoted as xi and vi (i = 1, 2), respectively. We express the position of each planet as x1 = xCM + a1 cos ω(t − t0), x2 = xCM − a2 cos ω(t − t0), (1) (2) where the orbital radius of each planet around their COM is denoted by ai, the angular velocity of the binary motion is denoted by ω, and t0 means the time when the binary separation becomes perpendicular to our line of sight (See Table 1 for a list of parameters and their definition). For simplicity, we shall set t0 = 0 below. One can approximate vCM as being constant during the transit, because the duration is much shorter than the orbital period for the binary around the host star. 2.2. Transits in light curves The decrease in the apparent luminosity due to mutual transits is expressed as L = S − ∆S S , (3) where S = πR2, S1 = πr2 2, ∆S = S1 + S2 − S12. Here, r1 and r2 denote the radii of the planets 1 and 2, and S12 denotes the area of the apparent overlap between them, which is seen from the observer. Without loss of generality, we assume r1 ≥ r2. 1, S2 = πr2 2.3. Effects on light curves We investigate light curves by mutual transits due to planet-companion systems. The time derivative of Eq. (2) becomes v2 = vCM + a2ω sinω(t − t0) . Hence, the apparent retrograde motion is observed if vCM < a2ω, which we call the fast planet-companion's spin. If vCM > a2ω, 4 we call it slow spin. The Earth-Moon and Jupiter-Ganymede systems represent slow and marginal cases, respectively. Figure 1 shows light curves by mutual transits for two cases. One is the zero spin limit of ω → 0 as a reference. In this case, motion of the two objects is nothing but a translation. Because of the time lag between the first and second transits, a certain plateau appears in light curves. The other is a slow spin case as W = 1, where W denotes the dimensionless spin ratio defined as aω/vCM . Its basic feature is the same as that for zero spin case, except for certain changes that are due to the relative motion between the planets. In the slow case, averaged inclination of each slope in the light curve is dependent on time, especially at the start and end of the mutual transit. Here we assume planet-companion systems with a common mass density, a radius ratio as R : r1 : r2 = 20 : 2 : 1, and a/R = 0.9. Fast spin cases are shown by Figs. 2 and 3 (W = 3 and 6, respectively), where the apparent retrograde motion produces characteristic fluctuations. Here we assume the same configuration as that in Fig. 1 except for shorter distance from the host star. These figures show also the transverse positions of planets with time, which would help us to understand the chronological changes in the light curves. In particular, it can be understood that such characteristic patterns appear only when two faint objects are in front of the star and one of them transits (or occults) the other. 2.4. Parameter determinations through mutual transits In all the above cases, the amount of decrease in light curves or the magnitude of fluctuations gives the ratios among the radii of the star and two faint objects (R,r1,r2). Through behaviors of apparent light curves in both slow and fast cases, aω (as its ratio to vCM ) can be obtained as shown by Figs. 1-3. Here, vCM is determined as vCM = 2R/TE by measuring the duration of the whole transit time TE because of R ≫ r1, r2, if the stellar radius R (and mass mS) are known for instance by its spectral type. Therefore, aω is determined separately. The planet-companion's spin velocity aω determines the gravity between the objects. The spin period P (and thus ω) can be determined, especially for the fast rotation case that produces multiple "hills", because an interval between neighboring "hills" is nothing but a half of the binary period. As a result, the binary separation a is obtained separately. Hence one can determine the total mass of the binary as Gmtot = ω2a3 from Kepler's third law, where G denotes the gravitational constant. 1(r3 1 + r3 If we assume also that the mass density is common for two objects constituting the binary (this may be reasonable especially for similar size objects as r1 ∼ r2), each mass is determined 2)−1mtot, respectively. Therefore, the orbital radius as m1 = r3 of each body around the COM is obtained as a1 = r3 2)−1a, respectively. At this point, importantly, the two objects can be identified as a true binary or planet-satellite system. 2)−1mtot and m2 = r3 2)−1a and a2 = r3 2(r3 1 + r3 2(r3 1 + r3 1(r3 1 + r3 5 In a slow spin case, on the other hand, the apparent separation a⊥ (normal to our line of sight) is determined as a⊥ = T12vCM from measuring the time lag T12 between the first and second transits because vCM is known above. Before closing this subsection, we briefly mention the time scale of the brightness fluctu- ation. The full width of a "hill" Thill corresponds to the crossing time of two planets as 2r/aω. We thus obtain aω = 2r Thill . (4) By measuring the width, therefore, aω can be determined directly and independently only for the fast spin case that produces spiky patterns. To be more precise, the full width of a "hill" at top and bottom are expressed as (See also Figure 4) Ttop = Tbottom = 2(r1 − r2) aω 2(r1 + r2) aω , . (5) (6) Only for symmetric binaries (r1 = r2), we have Ttop = 0 and thus true spikes. Otherwise, truncated spikes (or "hills") appear. With r1 and r2 determined from brightness changes, measuring either Ttop or Tbottom provides aω. This can be verified in Figure 2. Figure 5 shows a flow chart of the parameter determinations that are discussed above. The half width for giant planets is about r aω ∼ 5 × 103 r 5 × 104km 10km/s aω ! sec. (7) Therefore, detections of such fluctuations due to mutual transits of extrasolar binary planets require frequent observations, say every hour. Furthermore, more frequency (e.g., every ten minutes) is necessary for parameter estimations of the binary. Let us mention a connection of the present result with current space telescopes. Decrease 2/R2). Besides the time resolution in apparent luminosity due to the secondary planet is O(r2 (or observation frequency) and mission lifetimes, detection limits by COROT with the achieved accuracy of photometric measurements (700 ppm in one hour) could put r2/R ∼ 2 × 10−2. The nominal integration time is 32 sec. but co-added over 8.5 min. except for 1000 selected targets for which the nominal sampling is preserved. By the Kepler mission with expected 10 ppm differential sensitivity for solar-like stars with mV = 12, the lower limit will be reduced to r2/R ∼ 3 × 10−3. An analogy of the Earth-Moon (r2/R ∼ 2.5 × 10−3, W ∼ 0.03) and Jupiter- Ganymede (r2/R ∼ 4 × 10−3, W ∼ 0.8) will be marginally detectable. Figure 6 shows a light curve due to an analogy of the Earth-Moon system. Observations both with high frequency (at least during the time of transits) and with good photometric sensitivity are desired for future detections of mutual transits. COROT satisfies these requirements and thus has a chance to find mutual transits. Kepler (with CCDs readout every three seconds) is one of the most suitable missions to date for the goal. 6 2.5. Event rate and possible bounds on Earth-Moon-like systems The probability of detecting mutual transits is expressed as p = p1p2p3, where the prob- ability for an object (with orbital period PCM ) transiting its host star during the observed time Tobs is denoted as p1 = Tobs/PCM , that for one component transiting (or occulting) the other during the eclipse with duration TE is denoted as p2 = TE/P for slow cases (p2 = 1 for P < TE), and that for a condition that an observer is located in directions where the eclipse can be seen is denoted as p3 = θmax/(π/2). Here, the maximum angle from the orbital plane becomes θmax ≡ R/aCM . Hence we obtain p = 2RTETobs πaCM P PCM , (8) which becomes p ∼ 6 × 10−5Tobsyr−1 for an Earth-Moon-like system. We thus need to monitor a number of stars (NS > 104). Let f denote the fraction of such systems for an averaged star. We have the expected events n for observing NS stars during Tobs as n = f pNS. Therefore, monitoring 105 stars for three years with Kepler may lead to the discovery of a second Earth- Moon-like system if the fraction is larger than 0.05, or it may put upper limits on the fraction as f < (pNS)−1 ∼ 0.05(3yr/Tobs)(105/NS). We should note that there exist constraints due to some physical mechanisms on our parameters, especially the orbital separation. For instance, the companion's orbital radius must be larger than the Roche limit and smaller than the Hill radius (e.g., Danby 1988, Murray and Dermott 2000). These stability conditions are satisfied by the Earth-Moon system. Therefore, we can use Eq. (8) for Earth-Moon analogies. For general cases such as "exoearth-exomoon" systems that have much smaller separations or are located at much shorter distance from their parent star, however, we have to take account of corrections due to certain physical constraints (e.g., Sartoretti and Schneider 1999 for estimates of such conditional probabilities with incorporating the Roche and Hill radii). 3. Conclusion We have shown that light curves by mutual transits of extrasolar planets depend strongly on a planet-companion's spin velocity, and especially for small separation cases where occulta- tion of one faint object by the other transiting a parent star causes an apparent increase in light curves and characteristic fluctuations appear. We have shown also that extrasolar mutual tran- sits provide a complementary method for measuring the radii of two transiting objects, their separation and mass, and consequently for identifying them as a true binary, planet-satellite system or others. Event rates and possible bounds on the fraction of Earth-Moon-like systems have been presented. Up to this point, we have considered only the obscuration effect in a simplistic manner. When actual light curves are analyzed, we should incorporate (1) a small deviation of the inclination angle from 90 degrees, (2) elliptical motions of the binary and (3) 7 perturbations as three (or more)-body interactions (e.g., Danby 1988, Murray and Dermott 2000). Limb darkenings also should be taken into account. References Aitken, R. G. 1964 The Binary Stars (NY: Dover) Binnendijk, L. 1960 Properties of Double Stars (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press) Cabrera, J., & Schneider, J. 2007, A&A, 464, 1133 Canup, R. M., & Ward, W. R. 2006, Nature, 441, 834 Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M., 2000, ApJ, 529, L45 Danby, J. M. A., 1988, Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics (VA, William-Bell) Deeg, H. J., et al., 1998, A&A, 338, 479 Deeg, H. J., Doyle, L. R., Kozhevnikov, V. P., Blue, J. E., Martin, E. L., Schneider, J., 2000, A&A, 358, L5 Deming, D., Seager, S., Richardson, L. J., & Harrington, J., 2005, Nature, 434, 740 Doyle, L. R., et al., 2000, ApJ, 535, 338 Gaudi, B. S., & Winn, J. N., 2007, ApJ, 655, 550 Jewitt, D., & Haghighipour, N. 2007, ARAA, 45, 261 Jewitt, D., & Sheppard, S. 2005, Space. Sci. Rev., 116, 441 Kipping, D. M. 2009a, MNRAS, 392, 181 Kipping, D. M. 2009b, arXiv:0904.2565 Lafreni`ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., van Kerkwijk, M. H., 2008, ApJ, 689, L153 Murray, C. D., Dermott, S. F., 2000, Solar system dynamics (Cambridge, Cambridge U. Press) Narita, N., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 763 Narita, N., Sato, B., Ohshima, O., & Winn, J. N. 2008, PASJ, 60, L1 Ohta, Y., Taruya, A., & Suto, Y. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118 Sartoretti, P., & Schneider, J. 1999, A&AS, 134, 553 Simon, A., Szatm´ary, K., & Szab´o, G. M. 2007, A&A, 470, 727 Szab´o, G. M., Szatm´ary, K., Div´eki, Z., & Simon, A. 2006, A&A, 450, 395 Winn, J. N., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1215 8 Table 1. List of quantities characterizing a system in this paper. Symbol Definition PCM Orbital period around a host star P ω Spin period of a planet-companion system Angular velocity of a planet-companion system (= 2π/P ) aCM Distance of planet-companion's center of mass from their host star a a⊥ R r1 r2 m1 m2 mtot xCM x1 x2 t0 Separation of a planet-companion system Apparent separation of a planet-companion system Host star's radius Planet's radius Companion's radius Planet's mass Companion's mass m1 + m2 Transverse position of a planet-companion's center of mass Planet's transverse position Companion's transverse position Time at the maximum apparent separation of planet-companion Ttop Time duration: width of a hill's top in light curves Tbottom Time duration: width of a hill's bottom in light curves T12 Time lag between the first and second transits p f Detection probability for a given set of parameters Fraction of Earth-Moon-like systems for an averaged star 9 Fig. 1. Light curves: Solid red one denotes the zero binary's spin limit as a reference (W ≡ aω/vCM = 0). Dashed green one is a slow spin case (large separation) for W = 1. The vertical axis denotes the apparent luminosity (in percents). The horizontal one is time in units of the half crossing time of the star by the COM of the binary, defined as R/vCM . For simplicity, we assume the binary with a common mass density, a radius ratio as R : r1 : r2 = 20 : 2 : 1, and a/R = 0.9. 10 Fig. 2. Top panel: a light curve for a fast spin case (small separation). The radius and mass ratio are the same as those in Fig. 1. We assume W = 3. Brightness fluctuations appear with the width of Ttop = 0.033 and Tbottom = 0.1. These values satisfy Eqs. (5) and (6). Bottom panel: the motion of each body in the direction of x normalized by R (solid red for the primary and dotted green for the secondary). When one faint object transits or occults the other in front of the host star, mutual transits occur and a "hill" appears in the light curve. 11 Fig. 3. Top panel: a light curve for a faster spin case (smaller separation). Bottom panel: the motion of each body. The parameters are the same as those in Fig. 1, except for W = 6. Comparing with Figure 2, the number of "hills" increases, and the shape of the light curve becomes more complicated especially at the bottom. A plateau around t = 0.5 is due to a single transit of one faint object since the other has passed across a host star. 12 Fig. 4. Schematic figure of characteristic fluctuations due to one faint object transiting across the other in front of their host star. 13 Fig. 5. Flow chart of parameter determinations. Starting from measurements of brightness changes, the separation a is eventually determined for a fast spin case. 14 Fig. 6. Light curve by transits of a Earth-Moon type system. The parameters are all assumed to be the same as those for the Earth and Moon in our solar system. Hence we have r1/R ∼ 9 × 10−3, r2 ∼ 3 × 10−3 and W = 0.04 in this figure. 15
1811.08441	1	1811	2018-11-20T19:00:07	Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	Context. Despite the recent discovery of spiral-shaped features in protoplanetary discs in the near-infrared and millimetric wavelengths, there is still an active discussion to understand how they formed. In fact, the spiral waves observed in discs around young stars can be due to different physical mechanisms: planet/companion torques, gravitational perturbations or illumination effects. Aims. We study the spirals formed in the gaseous phase due to two diametrically opposed shadows cast at fixed disc locations. The shadows are created by an inclined non-precessing disc inside the cavity, which is assumed to be optically thick. In particular, we analyse the effect of these spirals on the dynamics of the dust particles and discuss their detectability in transition discs. Methods. We perform gaseous hydrodynamical simulations with shadows, then we compute the dust evolution on top of the gaseous distribution, and finally we produce synthetic ALMA observations of the dust emission based on radiative transfer calculations. Results. Our main finding is that mm- to cm-sized dust particles are efficiently trapped inside the shadow-triggered spirals. We also observe that particles of various sizes starting at different stellocentric distances are well mixed inside these pressure maxima. This dynamical effect would favour grain growth and affect the resulting composition of planetesimals in the disc. In addition, our radiative transfer calculations show spiral patterns in the disc at 1.6 {\mu}m and 1.3 mm. Due to their faint thermal emission (compared to the bright inner regions of the disc) the spirals cannot be detected with ALMA. Our synthetic observations prove however that shadows are observable as dips in the thermal emission.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. dustyspirals November 22, 2018 c(cid:13)ESO 2018 Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs N. Cuello,1,2 M. Montesinos,3,4, 8 S.M. Stammler,1,5 F. Louvet6 and J. Cuadra1, 2, 4, 7 8 1 0 2 v o N 0 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 4 4 8 0 . 1 1 8 1 : v i X r a 1 Instituto de Astrofísica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Millennium Nucleus "Protoplanetary discs", Chile 3 Instituto de Física y Astronomía, Universidad de Valparaíso, Av. Gran Bretaña 1111, 5030 Casilla, Valparaíso, Chile 4 Núcleo Milenio de Formación Planetaria (NPF), Chile 5 University Observatory, Ludwig Maximilian University, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 Munich, Germany 6 Departamento de Astronomía de Chile, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 7 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestriche Physik (MPE), D-85748 Garching, Germany 8 Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Beijing, China Received . . . ; accepted . . . ABSTRACT Context. Despite the recent discovery of spiral-shaped features in protoplanetary discs in the near-infrared and millimetric wave- lengths, there is still an active discussion to understand how they formed. In fact, the spiral waves observed in discs around young stars can be due to different physical mechanisms: planet/companion torques, gravitational perturbations or illumination effects. Aims. We study the spirals formed in the gaseous phase due to two diametrically opposed shadows cast at fixed disc locations. The shadows are created by an inclined non-precessing disc inside the cavity, which is assumed to be optically thick. In particular, we analyse the effect of these spirals on the dynamics of the dust particles and discuss their detectability in transition discs. Methods. We perform gaseous hydrodynamical simulations with shadows, then we compute the dust evolution on top of the gaseous distribution, and finally we produce synthetic ALMA observations of the dust emission based on radiative transfer calculations. Results. Our main finding is that mm- to cm-sized dust particles are efficiently trapped inside the shadow-triggered spirals. We also observe that particles of various sizes starting at different stellocentric distances are well mixed inside these pressure maxima. This dynamical effect would favour grain growth and affect the resulting composition of planetesimals in the disc. In addition, our radiative transfer calculations show spiral patterns in the disc at 1.6 µm and 1.3 mm. Due to their faint thermal emission (compared to the bright inner regions of the disc) the spirals cannot be detected with ALMA. Our synthetic observations prove however that shadows are observable as dips in the thermal emission. Key words. protoplanetary disks -- hydrodynamics -- methods: numerical -- radiative transfer -- planets and satellites: formation 1. Introduction The process of star formation, through the collapse of a prestel- lar core, often leads to the creation of a protoplanetary disc made of gas and dust orbiting the proto-star (Williams & Cieza 2011). In the current paradigm of planet formation, protoplanetary discs are the birthplace of the first rocky bodies, also called planetes- imals. These solids eventually become planets, either by core- accretion or by gravitational instabilities, in time-scales shorter than several Myrs (Ribas et al. 2014). Up-to-date, more than 3 500 confirmed exoplanets have been detected1, which clearly shows that planets are a common by-product of star formation. However, despite the large amount of theoretical and experimen- tal studies in the field, the process by which planets form from micron-sized dust grains remains elusive (Birnstiel et al. 2016, and references therein). In fact, there are several barriers for planet formation such as the radial-drift (Weidenschilling 1977; Laibe et al. 2012), the bouncing (Zsom et al. 2010) and the fragmentation (Blum & Wurm 2008) of solids during their evolution inside the disc. These physical processes severely compromise the survival and/or the growth of such solids, and therefore prevent planet formation. Several mechanisms have been proposed to circum- 1 www.exoplanet.eu vent this problem: the presence of planetary traps (Paardekooper & Mellema 2004; Fouchet et al. 2007; Pinilla et al. 2012), streaming instabilities (Youdin & Goodman 2005; Jacquet et al. 2011; Johansen et al. 2012), anticyclonic vortices (Barge & Som- meria 1995; Meheut et al. 2012; Baruteau & Zhu 2016), dead zones (Kretke & Lin 2007; Dzyurkevich et al. 2010), merid- ional circulation (Fromang et al. 2011), photophoretic transport (Krauss & Wurm 2005; Cuello et al. 2016), radiation pressure effects (Vinkovi´c 2014) and self-induced dust traps (Gonzalez et al. 2017) among others. The common denominator of these processes is the concentration and/or the growth of dust at a par- ticular location of the disc, either by stopping the radial-drift or by lowering the relative velocities of collision among solids. The former avoids solids to be accreted by the central star, while the latter allows particles to grow and eventually decouple from the gaseous phase. In this work, we study the effect of shadow-triggered gaseous spirals on the dust distribution of a transition disc. In general, spiral wakes can be caused by different mechanisms: planet torques (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979), gravitational instabilities (Kratter & Lodato 2016, and references therein), stellar encoun- ters (Pfalzner 2003) and illumination effects (Montesinos et al. 2016). Regardless of their origin, these perturbations cause a local symmetry breaking in the disc, which has profound con- Article number, page 1 of 15 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals sequences for structure evolution and planetesimal formation. In the recent years, due to the spectacular increase in angu- lar resolution and the development of extreme adaptive optics, it has been possible to reveal astonishing asymmetric features in several transition discs. These observations can be split in two kinds according to the wavelength: the near-infrared (NIR) or scattered-light ones, which trace the small micron-sized par- ticles; and the (sub-)millimetric ones, which map the thermal emission of large mm/cm dust grains. In Table 1, we report some of the most interesting transition discs exhibiting visible spirals in the NIR and/or large asymmetric dust traps (e.g. HD 142527 and HD 135344B). Elias 2-27 is a system of particular interest. In fact, Pérez et al. (2016) report a couple of symmetric spirals in the dust ther- mal emission at 1.3 mm with ALMA. To our knowledge, this is the only detection of a grand-design spiral in the large grains distribution, i.e. close to the mid-plane. It remains however un- clear whether the spirals and the shadows detected by Stolker et al. (2016) and by Benisty et al. (2017) are related to planet formation processes or not. For instance, in the protoplanetary disc around the F-type star HD 135344B, Stolker et al. (2016) report the detection of four shadows (A, B, C and D) in the J- band and at least three spirals arms. Surprisingly, shadow C is not detected in earlier observations (R-, I- and Y-bands), which seems to indicate its transient nature. This could be explained by a local perturbation in the inner regions of the disc or by an accretion funnel flow from the inner disc onto the star. In prin- ciple, an outer planet could excite a pair of symmetrical spirals as suggested by Dong et al. (2015), even though there is no ev- idence of planetary gaps whatsoever. Until now, the only works that established a clear connexion between shadows and spirals are Montesinos et al. (2016) and Montesinos & Cuello (2018). However, it is still unknown if this mechanism can explain the shadows in HD 135344B and how it affects the dust distribution in the disc. After the detection of dusty spirals in Elias 2-27 by Pérez et al. (2016), many scenarios have been proposed and tested to explain the formation of such spirals. For instance, Tomida et al. (2017) report similar spirals in fairly massive three-dimensional discs (class-I objects) formed via magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects during the phase of envelope collapse. In this case, the pair of grand-design spiral arms form due to gravitational insta- bilities in the disc. Interestingly, the spirals disappear in a few rotations and new spirals form due to growing instabilities in the gas. This spiral formation process occurs throughout the class-0 and class-1 phases. Meru et al. (2017) also study gravitation- ally unstable discs and show that it is possible to create spirals analogue to those of Elias 2-27, without considering MHD ef- fects. In addition, the authors also consider the case of an internal (< 300 au) and an external (> 300 au) companion. The former configuration fails to produce spirals as the ones observed, while the latter is able to create grand-design spirals in the disc. The companion must however be comprised between 300 and 700 au and with a mass below 13 Jupiter masses. Both scenarios, grav- itational instability and the presence of an exterior companion, seem equally likely with the current observational constraints. In this paper, we consider the formation of spirals triggered by shadows proposed by Montesinos et al. (2016), which form in the presence of light-obstructing material close to the star (Marino et al. 2015). This mechanism is due to the peculiar az- imuthal acceleration caused by the shadows cast at the inner rim of the disc (cf. figure 3 in Montesinos et al. (2016)). In this sce- nario, the spirals in the gaseous disc have lifetimes of the order of several thousand years and could in principle be detected in Article number, page 2 of 15 the NIR (H band, 1.6 µm). However, we are left with the follow- ing questions: can these shadow-triggered spirals efficiently trap dust? If yes, what are the observational signatures of this mech- anism? It is not trivial to address these questions because dust dynamics strongly depends on particle size, intrinsic density and gaseous local conditions (cf. Sec. 3.2). Table 1: Detections of spiral and asymmetric dust traps in tran- sition discs. Scattered-light Continuum emission System HD 142527 MWC 758 HD 100453 HD 135344B Oph IRS 48 HD 100546 Elias 2-27 1 3, 4 5, 6 7, 8 10 12 - 2 - - 9 11 - 13 References. (1) Christiaens et al. (2014); (2) Casassus et al. (2015); (3) Grady et al. (2013); (4) Benisty et al. (2015); (5) Wagner et al. (2015); (6) Benisty et al. (2017); (7) Muto et al. (2012); (8) Stolker et al. (2016); (9) van der Marel et al. (2016); (10) Follette et al. (2015); (11) van der Marel et al. (2013); (12) Garufi et al. (2016); (13) Pérez et al. (2016). The radial motion of dust particles embedded inside a gaseous sub-Keplerian disc, i.e. in presence of radial pressure gradient, has been long known and extensively studied (Weiden- schilling 1977; Nakagawa et al. 1986; Laibe et al. 2012). More recently, the case of an azimuthal pressure gradient and the re- sulting dust dynamics was considered by Birnstiel et al. (2013). In both cases, solid particles tend to move towards the pressure maxima at velocities which depend on their Stokes number and the drag regime (cf. Section 2.2.1). So far, the dust behaviour in presence of both, radial and azimuthal, pressure gradients has been modestly explored, and only for a handful of mechanisms: planetary wakes (Paardekooper & Mellema 2006; Ayliffe et al. 2012), disc instabilities (Rice et al. 2004; Dipierro et al. 2015; Tomida et al. 2017; Meru et al. 2017) and gravitational perturba- tions (Zsom et al. 2011; Dai et al. 2015). Thus, the dust dynamics in presence of the shadow-triggered gaseous spirals proposed by Montesinos et al. (2016) remains to be studied. The aim of this work is twofold: on the one hand, we anal- yse in detail the dust dynamics in presence of shadow-triggered spirals; and, on the other hand, we produce synthetic ALMA ob- servations of the thermal emission of the dust. This allows us to address the two questions aforementioned about the dust trap- ping and its observability. The paper is structured as follows: in Section 2, we discuss the three main steps of our calculations; in Section 3, we report our results and the images obtained; in Section 4, we discuss our results; and, finally, we draw our con- clusions in Section 5. 2. Numerical method The approach followed in this work is based on three main steps, which connect our hydrodynamical simulations with the obser- vations in a consistent way: 1. gaseous hydrodynamical simulations with shadows, 2. dust evolution on top of the gaseous distribution, 3. synthetic ALMA observations of the dust emission. N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs The first hydrodynamical step, described in Section 2.1, allows us to obtain the dynamical fields of the gas (velocity, tempera- ture, density, acceleration) required for the dust evolution calcu- lation. The equations of motion for the dust particles and their numerical integration are reported in Section 2.2. Finally, based on the obtained dust distributions, we simulate the thermal emis- sion of the dust and emulate ALMA observations of our system in Section 2.3. 2.1. Hydrodynamical simulations with shadows We model the evolution of a self-gravitating circumstellar gaseous disc by means of the public two-dimensional hydro- dynamic code fargo-adsg2 (Masset 2000; Baruteau & Masset 2008). The code fargo-adsg solves the Navier-Stokes, continu- ity and energy equations on a staggered mesh in polar coordi- nates (r, θ). The simulations were performed with an improved version of this code, which includes physical mechanisms such as cooling, stellar heating and shadows. This allows us to sim- ulate the evolution of a transition disc in presence of projected shadows as in Montesinos et al. (2016). These are considered as regions of the disc for which the incoming stellar irradiation is equal to 0. Below, we describe the disc model considered, the energy equation with shadows and the initialisation of the hy- drodynamical simulations. The evolution of the disc is followed for about 10 000 years. Fig. 1: Sketch of the inner regions of the disc model considered in this work. The outer disc is face-on, while the non-precessing inner disc is edge-on. The light-obstructing material around the star casts shadows at two diametrically opposed regions of the outer disc, in dark blue. term cannot be neglected. Moreover, it has important effects for the dust evolution as discussed in Sec. 2.2.1 2.1.1. Disc model We consider a gaseous disc orbiting a solar-like star of mass M(cid:63) = 1 M(cid:12) and luminosity L(cid:63) = 1 L(cid:12). The disc extends from rin = 100 au to rout = 600 au. The total disc mass is set to 0.25 M(cid:12) and its initial density profile is given by: . (1) Σ(r) = 711 g cm−2 ×(cid:18) r (cid:19)−1 1 au 2.1.2. Energy equation and shadows model We implement the shadows in the disc in the same fashion as in Montesinos et al. (2016). If there are no shadows, the disc is irradiated by stellar light at all azimuths. The stellar irradiation heating per unit area is given by Frank et al. (2002): (cid:63)(r) = (1 − β) Q+ (cid:32)d ln H (cid:33) − 1 (2) , L(cid:63) 4πr2 H r d ln r This model corresponds to a marginally stable disc for which the Toomre parameter remains above 1 throughout the simulation (cf. Appendix B). The computational domain in physical units extends from rin to rout au over nr = 512 logarithmically spaced radial cells. The grid samples 2π in azimuth with nθ = 1024 equally spaced sectors. We also ran simulations at higher res- olution with nr = 512 and nθ = 2048 obtaining the same re- sults, which means that the aforementioned resolution is accu- rate enough for our model. The turbulent viscosity of the gaseous disc is modelled by considering an α-disc (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973), with the α parameter set to 10−4. We assume a constant opacity equal to κ = 1 cm2g−1. It is worth noting that the opacity directly im- pacts on the cooling rate Q− of Eq. 7 in Sect. 2.1.2. Interestingly, as shown in Montesinos et al. (2016), shadow-triggered spirals appear for high and low values of κ: 130 and 1 cm2g−1, respec- tively. A more realistic opacity depending on both the tempera- ture and the density, e.g. the Rosseland mean opacity (Semenov et al. 2003), would have a minor effect on the disc for the range of temperatures considered in this work. This justifies our choice of a constant opacity. The only heat source we consider is the stellar irradiation and we do not take into account the viscous heating, which is dominant only for the very inner regions of the disc (cf. Appendix A). All our models include self-gravity, meaning that the gas feels the gravitational potential of the star as well as of the disc itself. Given the mass of our system, this 2 http://fargo.in2p3.fr/-FARGO-ADSG- where β is the albedo, L(cid:63) the stellar luminosity and H the disc scale height. We assume β = 0, which means that all the incom- ing radiation gets absorbed by the disc. Assuming local hydro- static equilibrium, the scale height H is given by: H = cs vk r , (3) where cs is the sound speed and vk the Keplerian velocity. During the calculation, the value of H is continuously updated according to the evolution of the temperature of the disc. Also, the viscosity is given by ν = α cs H. We further assume the presence of a non-precessing edge- on disc (i = 90◦) inside the large cavity. This type of struc- tures can be created by an inner planetary or stellar compan- ion as in Facchini et al. (2018) and blocks the stellar light. In this configuration, two static and diametrically opposed shad- ows are cast onto the outer disc as shown in Figure 1. In the case of prograde rotating shadows, with rotation periods smaller than 20 kyr, planetary-like spiral can appear at the corotation region with the shadows (Montesinos & Cuello 2018). This effect is neglected in this work. In other words, our assumption of static shadows is valid for shadows with precession periods larger than roughly 20 kyr. It is worth highlighting that this inner disc is not treated in the hydrodynamical simulations, only its radiative ef- fect are considered. Thus, we modify the stellar irradiation rate to account for the shadows: Q+ d (r, θ) = s(θ) Q+ (cid:63)(r) , (4) Article number, page 3 of 15 ✹✹inner cavityouter discinner disc i ~ 90ºA&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals where the function s(θ) is given by: s(θ) = 1 − A exp (−θ4/σ2) − A exp (−(θ − π)4/σ2) , with A = 0.999 and σ = 0.05. This creates two shadows at θ = 0◦ and at θ = 90◦ with a width of about 29◦, where the stellar heating rate is set to nearly zero. The width is motivated by HD 142527's case as reported by Marino et al. (2015), and is also comparable with HD 135344B's shadow B, as reported by Stolker et al. (2016). By construction, the illuminated and the shadowed regions are smoothly connected. (5) Our hydro code solves the non-stationary equation for the (6) thermal energy density, e, given by: d − Q− + ∇ · (e v) = −P∇ · v + Q+ ∂e ∂t where v is the gas velocity, P the gas pressure, Q+ d the stellar heating rate per unit area (cf. Eq. 4) and Q− the radiative cooling of the disc. For our calculations, we use: Q− = 2σSBT 4/τ , where σSB is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and τ the optical depth given by τ = 1 2 κΣ. In order to close the system of equa- tions, we consider an ideal equation of state: P = Σ T R, with T the gas temperature and R = kB/µmp, where kB is the Boltz- mann constant, µ the mean molecular weight of the gas and mp the mass of the proton. Thus, the relationship between the ther- mal energy density and the temperature reads: (7) , e = Σ T R γ − 1 , (8) where γ is the adiabatic index. Finally, in order to avoid unreal- istically low temperatures in the disc, we set the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background (CMB) temperature (2.7 K) as the floor temperature in our simulations. 2.1.3. Initialisation In a stationary regime, the energy received from the star equates the energy loss through the disc's surface. In order to reach a steady-state regime as fast as possible, the disc is initialised un- = Q−. Assuming vertical hydrostatic equi- der the condition Q+ (cid:63) librium, the gas temperature is related to the aspect-ratio of the disc as follows: µR . (9) Defining h = H/r = h0r f and equating Eq. (2) with Eq. (7), (cid:18) H (cid:19)2 GM(cid:63) r r T(r) = we obtain: (cid:34)(1 − β)L(cid:63) 16πσSB H r = (cid:35)1/7 R4 f Σ0κ G4M4 (cid:63) r f , (10) where f is the flaring index of the disc and is given by f = d ln(H/r)/d ln r. Eq. 10 gives a recipe to initialise the disc's aspect-ratio as a function of the initial disc and star properties. Formally, this equation is not self-consistent because the aspect- ratio depends on its own derivative. However, the dependence on the flaring index is very weak (∝ f 1/7). Therefore, as a first or- der approximation, we can assume that f is nearly constant and equal to f (cid:39) 1/7. Article number, page 4 of 15 2.2. Dust evolution calculation The outputs of our hydro simulation are used as inputs for our dust code, which computes the evolution of an ensemble of N in- dependent dust particles. Given that it is a post-processing calcu- lation, the gaseous phase is not affected by the dust distribution. On the contrary, the dust is affected by the gas dynamics due to the aerodynamical drag, which strongly depends on the local disk conditions (P, T). It is useful to introduce the stopping time (ts) defined as the time it takes to the (Keplerian) dust to reach the same velocity as the (sub-Keplerian) gas. The dimensionless parameter called Stoked (noted St) is also relevant for dust dy- namics since it measures the dust coupling to the gas, i.e. the drag regime. In the Epstein regime, valid for particles with sizes smaller than 9/4 of their mean free path, St reads as follows: St = ts ΩK = ρda ρgcs ΩK , (11) where ΩK is the Keplerian frequency, ρd the bulk density of the particle, a its radius, ρg the volumetric gas density and cs the speed of the sound. There are three different regimes: for St (cid:28) 1, the dust is well-coupled to the gas; for St ∼ 1, the dust particles are marginally coupled to gas and feel the strongest radial-drift; and finally, for St (cid:29) 1, the particles are completely decoupled from the gas. Given the density profile considered (cf. Eq. 1), for a fixed grain size a, the Stokes number is an increasing function of the distance to the star. 2.2.1. Equations of motion and numerical integrator Our dust code is based on previous work by Paardekooper (2007) and Zsom et al. (2011). In addition to the aerodynamical drag, dust particles feel both the gravitational potential from the star and from the gaseous disc. For a given dust particle of index i, we note (ri, θi) and (vr,i, vθ,i) the polar coordinates and velocities respectively. Therefore, the equations of motion read as follows: dri dt dθi dt dvr,i dt dLi dt = vr,i Li r2 i L2 i r3 i = − ∂Φ ∂θ − ∂Φ ∂r + Fθ,i + Fr,i (12) (13) (15) (14) = = where Li is the specific angular momentum, and Fr,i and Fθ,i are respectively the radial and azimuthal drag forces for particle i. Φ is the gravitational potential defined as: Φ = GM∗/R + Φd, where Φd is the disc's gravitational potential. The latter is given by the Fourier transform of the surface density Σ of the disc. In order to avoid this computationally expensive calculation, we use the radial and azimuthal accelerations given by the hydro code. It is worth noting that this term increases the orbital velocity of the gas compared to non self-gravitating discs. Thus, it is important to include it because otherwise the particles in the outer parts of the disc would orbit too slowly compared to the gas. This would result in a constant and unrealistic tailwind, which would send dust particles outwards. In general, Eqs. 12-15 also have inertial forces that arise from the fact that the coordinate frame of the hydro code is always centred on the star, and not on the centre of mass. In the case of a binary system for instance, this introduces inertial forces that N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs have to be taken into account. Given that our system is axisym- metric, the centre of mass is always at the centre of the star and we can therefore neglect these additional forces. The drag force on the dust particles is computed as follows: Fdrag = − ΩK St ∆v , (16) where ∆v is defined as the vectorial relative velocity between the dust, vdust, and the gas, vgas. The radial and azimuthal com- ponents of Fdrag are equal to Fr,i and Fθ,i in Eqs. 14 and 15 re- spectively. The expression of the Stokes number used in Eq. 16 is more general than the one in Eq. 11, which is only valid in the Epstein regime. In Appendix C, we report the method to com- pute the Stokes number in Eq. 16 and the details of the numer- ical integrator. We use a standard first-order leapfrog integrator to solve Eqs. 12-15, similar to that used by Paardekooper (2007). In Appendix D we also detail the benchmark analysis of the dust evolution code, which ensures the accuracy of the numerical in- tegrator. It is worth highlighting that, in order to ensure an accurate integration of Eqs. 12-15, we perform interpolations between ev- ery two consecutive gas snapshots3. More specifically, we feed the dust code with the values of the required physical fields of the gas (i.e. Σ, T, P, vgas and agas). By doing so, we consistently take into account the evolution of the gas disc to compute the resulting motion of the dust particles. 2.2.2. Dust simulation setup For each dust simulation, we use 100 000 dust particles with a fixed size between amin = 1 µm and amax = 10 cm. The parti- cles are initially distributed according to the initial gas surface density of Eq. 1. The bulk density of the solids, ρd, is set to 2.0 g cm−3 to model a mixture of pyroxene, refractory organics and ices. This distribution is a simplified initial condition since we are not considering a radial-dependent size distribution. The reason for this choice is that it allows us to better follow the dust kine- matics by directly comparing the different grain species consid- ered. For instance, in a more evolved protoplanetary disc, one would expect to have a more compact disc of millimetric grains compared to the one of micron-sized grains (Laibe et al. 2012). The implications of this assumption are discussed in Sect. 4.2. 2.3. Radiative transfer and synthetic ALMA observations 2.3.1. Radiative transfer with radmc-3d Since our goal is to connect our simulations with ALMA obser- vations, we need to compute the thermal emission of the dust dis- tribution at millimetric wavelengths. To perform radiative trans- fer calculations we use the radmc-3d sofware4 v0.41 (Dullemond et al. 2012). However, radmc-3d input is a continuous three- dimensional dust density distribution, for each particle size in the radiative transfer model. Thus, we need a conversion from a discrete (cf. Section 2.2) to a set of continuous dust distributions of different sizes. This is done in three main steps: 3 as a rule of thumb, we require at least 10 hydro snapshots per orbit at the inner boundary. 4 http://radmc3d.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/ 1) We spread all dust particles over a two-dimensional sur- face density grid with an exponential function: (cid:32)(r − ri)2 (cid:33) 2 D2 Σdust,i(r) = mi 2 πD2 exp . (17) Σdust,i is the surface density that one particle of mass mi at loca- tion ri contributes to the overall dust surface density. The factor 1/(πD2) conserves the mass of the particle, but the overall sur- face density has to be gauged later nevertheless. As kernel size, we use D = 100 au. This seems large compared to the size of our system, but as seen in Section 3.1, this is roughly the width of one spiral arm. Smaller values lead to noisy images. 2) We sort the particles into 12 particle size bins. Since we have particles between amin = 1 µm and amax = 10 cm, this leads to 2 bins per decade. We then sum the individual single-particle surface densities in 12 total dust surface densities according their size: (cid:88) Σdust, j = Σdust,i , (18) i a j,1<ai<a j,2 where a j,1 and a j,2 are the lower and the upper limits, respec- tively, of the size bin of index j. 3) Finally, these surface densities are vertically distributed with a Gaussian to get spatial mass densities according to: ρdust, j(r, z) = Σdust, j(r) √ 2 πh j exp − z2 2h2 j  , with the dust scale height given by Birnstiel et al. (2010) as: (19) (20) (cid:115) 1, h j = H · min α min(St j, 0.5)(1 + St2 j)  . The combined mass of all our 100 000 dust particles is far too low for a typical disc. Thus, to obtain a dust-to-gas ∼ 1%, we multiply our densities with a constant factor such that the total mass of the dusty disc is Mdust = 0.25 × 10−2 M(cid:12). We feed radmc-3D with the dust temperature and density distribution obtained from the hydro and the dust evolution sim- ulations, respectively. The radiative transfer is then performed through the Monte Carlo method of radmc-3d based on Mie the- ory (Bohren & Huffman 1983). We use the optical constants taken from Dorschner et al. (1995) assuming the particles are spherical and consist of pure pyroxene (Mg0.7Fe0.3SiO3)). It is worth highlighting that we modified radmc-3d, such that no pho- tons are sent from the star within two sectors of angle 15◦ at az- imuth 0◦ and 180◦ as shown in Fig. 1. This mimics the shadows that are cast by the inner disc as in Montesinos et al. (2016). The star has an effective temperature of Teff = 5700 K. The ra- diative transfer model is set up in spherical coordinates (R, θ, φ) with NR = 128, Nθ = 90 and Nφ = 64 grid points in the radial, azimuthal and polar directions respectively. We use a number of photon packages equal to 1 million for our calculations. We run radmc-3d simulations at a wavelengths of 1.6 µm and 1.3 mm in order to model the emission of micron- and mm-sized particles respectively. In Fig. 7, we report the images obtained for our disc model, after 10 000 years of evolution. Article number, page 5 of 15 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals 2.3.2. Synthetic ALMA images with casa For direct comparison with recent ALMA observations of tran- sition discs, we produce synthetic ALMA observations with the casa package (McMullin et al. 2007). To do so, we scale the ra- diative transfer calculations of Section 2.3.1 to a distance of 140 pc from the Earth. The bandwidth is 8 GHz and the integration time is 5 hours. We use the "alma.cycle15.cfg" array configura- tion. With this setup we obtain a synthetic beam of 0.08 arcsec2. In Section 3.3 we report the synthetic ALMA images obtained. Finally, in Section 4.3 we discuss the detectability of the dusty spirals in our disc. 3. Results In this work we consider two simulations: Sha-r100 and NoSha- r100, which correspond to the disc model described in Sec- tion 2.1.1 with and without shadows. In both cases, self-gravity (SG) is included. This allows us to disentangle shadowing effects from SG. 3.1. Spiral formation and evolution In Fig. 2 we show snapshots at four different times of the Sha- r100 simulation. Initially, the surface density of the disc is az- imuthally symmetric by construction. In the temperature maps of the disc, the shadowed regions of the disc can be easily seen at azimuths 0◦ and 180◦. The disc is colder in the shadowed re- gions because the stellar light is blocked by the inclined inner disc. The cold regions of the disc do not exactly overlap with the regions under the shadows. This effect is due to the anti- clockwise rotation of the disc and the time it takes the material to reach thermal equilibrium. For instance, in the inner regions, the gas crosses the shadows at high angular velocities and hence remains hotter compared to the gas of the outer regions at the same azimuth. This also explains why the shadows' interfaces are smoother than the ones defined by Eq. 5. This is also seen in the pressure map, where the shadowed regions have lower values compared to illuminated regions. After 4 000 years, faint grand- design spirals appear in the pressure and temperature distribu- tions, extending from 200 au up to roughly 400 au. These asym- metries increase in contrast with time as can be seen for further snapshots (7 500 and 10 000 yrs), where the spirals extend from 150 up to 500 au. In clear contrast, the NoSha-r100 simulation does not show grand-design spirals in the gas distribution for comparable time- scales. In Figure 3, we show the (r, θ) pressure maps for NoSha- r100 and Sha-r100 (left and middle panels respectively). To easily identify the differences, we plot in the rightmost panel the nor- malised perturbation amplitude (P−P0)/P0. In the darker regions the pressure is 20% to 40% higher compared to the unperturbed case. As will be shown in Sec. 3.2, these local pressure max- ima are able to trap dust. On the contrary, brighter regions are characterised by lower pressures. We see for instance that the shadows create two bright lanes at θ = 0◦ and θ = 180◦. Hence, the shadows trigger spirals in the disc, which then constitute re- gions of high pressure compared to the rest of the disc. Although we take into account self-gravity effects, the disc model consid- ered in this study is gravitationally stable (cf. Appendix B). It is worth noting however that, for self-gravitating discs, spirals appear faster in the presence of shadows compared to the case without shadows (Montesinos et al. 2016). In other words, the shadows render the disc more prone to fragment. To make sure that the shadows are indeed causing the spirals in the disc, we Article number, page 6 of 15 performed a control run where we artificially turned off the self- gravity. In this case, the shadow-triggered spirals still form in the disc proving that self-gravity is a sub-dominant effect. In our models, the spiral pattern locally co-rotates with the disc, as in the case of self-gravity induced spirals. This contrasts with planetary-induced spirals, which follow the Keplerian fre- quency of the planet in solid rotation. Due to the quasi-Keplerian motion of our spirals, the dust and the pressure over-density travel at almost the same angular speed, making it easier for the dust to concentrate in the local pressure maxima (cf. Sec- tion 3.2). As a side remark, we note that the number of spirals arms in the outer disc is correlated to the number of shadows cast. In fact, by artificially setting one or more than two shadows in the simulations, we observe an equal number of spiral arms and shadows after a few thousands of years. The structure and the evolution of each individual spiral arm remain however the same. These spiral-shaped over-densities in the gaseous distribu- tion constitute a "sweet spot" for dust trapping. The efficiency of this mechanism is detailed below. 3.2. Dust particles dynamics Figure 4 shows the distribution of dust, after 7 500 and 10 000 years, obtained with the dust evolution code described in Sec. 2.2. We also show the pressure map to compare the location of the dust spirals with the local pressure maxima. We extract three particular sizes from the dust simulation as three differ- ent dust species: a ≈ 100 µm, a ≈ 1 mm, a ≈ 1 cm. Given the different sizes considered, each species has its own dynam- ical behaviour (cf. Eq. 11): the larger the particles, the larger their Stokes number. In the outer parts of the disc, the Stokes numbers are initially close or below 1. In this case, the larger the particles, the faster the drift towards the pressure maxima. These are located inside the spirals and in the inner region of the disc. This can be seen in Figure 4, where in the outer parts of the disc the centimetric particles drift efficiently towards the spi- rals. The centimetric particles below r ≈ 300 au, being far from the spirals, drift inwards and concentrate at the disc inner edge. Since the pressure (or equivalently the density) inside the spi- rals is higher than the local mean pressure, the Stokes number is expected to decrease. This effect can be seen in Figure 4 for cen- timetric and millimetric particles. In fact, particles with Stokes numbers close to 1 are efficiently trapped inside the pressure maxima. Consequently, the regions in between the spiral arms get depleted in dust with time. Hence, on longer time-scales, the dust distribution is expected to efficiently concentrate inside the shadow-induced spirals. In order to study the characteristic behaviour of each species, we select individual but representative particles at a specific ra- dial and azimuthal position of the disc at the end of the simula- tion. Then, we trace back their evolution in the disc to find their initial positions. We chose two sets of particles: one at r = 300±5 au and another at r = 500±5 au, both at θ = 0±5◦. It is worth not- ing that taking θ = 180±5 we find similar results. Figures 5 and 6 show the distance to the star, the azimuth, the radial velocity and the Stokes numbers as a function of time for particles of different sizes belonging to each set. We show three representative parti- cles for each size bin: 100 µm in red, 1 mm in green and 1 cm in blue. By selection, the particles plotted have the same final radial and azimuthal positions. However, these were different at t = 0 yrs. In fact, in Fig. 5, we can see that the particles with small Stokes numbers (blue) remain at roughly the same radial posi- tion during the whole simulation, while those with St≈1 (red) N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs Fig. 2: Snapshots of the mid-plane gas temperature (top) and the vertically integrated pressure (bottom) at four different snapshots of the Sha-r100 simulation: (from left to right) 2 500, 5 000, 7 500 and 10 000 years. Fig. 3: (r, θ) maps of the vertically integrated pressure in NoSha-r100 (P0, left), in Sha-r100 (P, middle) and the normalized perturba- tion amplitude (P − P0)/P0 (right). All the snapshots are taken after 10 000 years of evolution. experience an outward movement. Particles with St≈0.1 show the same behaviour with a less rapid outward drift. Similar but more pronounced effects are observed for particles at r = 500 au at the end of the simulation. This is due to the greater pressure gradients present in the disc at larger stellocentric distances (cf. Fig. 3). In addition, we see that some particles with St≈1 beyond 500 au at t = 0 initially drift inwards and then concentrate at 500 au. This phenomenon is consistent with dust drifting towards5 the pressure maximum located at the spiral position. This is in contrast with what is observed for an unperturbed disc (i.e. with- out shadows) where all the dust drifts inwards (cf. Appendix D). Moreover, the radial velocity is in agreement with the dynamical behaviour described. In fact, we observe that this velocity (typi- cally negative) becomes slightly positive because of the presence of the pressure maxima. Also, it shows small oscillations due to the shadows' crossing. Hence, the gaseous spirals act as efficient dust traps gathering material of varied sizes, starting at different radial positions. 5 both from larger and smaller radii. 3.3. Synthetic observations Figure 7 shows the radiative transfer calculation for Sha-r100 af- ter 10 000 years of evolution at λ1 = 1.6 µm and λ2 = 1.3 mm obtained following the steps in Section 2.3.1. As mentioned in Section 1, the former traces the small dust and the latter the millimetric grains. The value of λ2 was chosen in order to have the same wavelength as the observations reported by Pérez et al. (2016). We assume the system is 140 pc away from the Earth and has an inclination equal to 13◦, i.e. almost face-on. Both images clearly show the two diametrically-opposed shadows, which are expected by construction. In addition, faint spiral patterns are seen at λ1 = 1.6 µm, while these appear sharper and more radi- ally concentrated at λ2 = 1.3 mm. The combined effect of radial- drift and dust trapping inside the spirals explains the difference between both images. We should stress however that the thermal emission from the disc inner rim at roughly 100 au is at least one order of magnitude brighter than the one emitted by the spi- rals arms. This has dramatic consequences for the detectability of such thermal emission. In Figure 8 we show the post-processed image with casa, which emulates an ALMA observation (cf. Section 2.3.2). In Article number, page 7 of 15 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals Fig. 4: Gas and dust distributions in the (r,θ)-plane after 7 500 (left) years and 10 000 (right) of evolution. The top row shows the vertically integrated pressure map of the disc. The rows below show the dust distribution coloured with the logarithm of the Stokes number (from top to bottom): 100 µm, 1 mm, 1cm. Spirals in the gas and in the dust have the same morphology. Article number, page 8 of 15 N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs Fig. 5: From top to bottom: radial and azimuthal positions, radial velocity, and Stokes numbers as a function of time for 3 groups of particles, which end at r = 300 ± 5 au and θ = 0 ± 5. We plot 100 µm particles in blue, 1 mm particles in green and 1 cm particles in red. Each group of particles contains 3 particles of equal size. Fig. 6: Same as Fig. 5, but for r = 500 ± 5 au. Article number, page 9 of 15 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals Fig. 7: Dust thermal emission at 1.6 µm (left) and 1.3 mm (right) after 10 000 years obtained with radmc-3d. The source is placed at d = 140 pc and the disc is seen almost face-on (i = 13◦). particular, the presence of two dips at θ = 0◦ and θ = 180◦ shows that it is in principle possible to detect the shadows at mil- limetric wavelengths. This is in good agreement with the ALMA synthetic images obtained by Facchini et al. (2018), where an inclined inner disc cast shadows onto the outer disc. Unfortu- nately, in our case, due to the low signal to noise in the spirals it is not possible to detect any significant thermal emission from the dusty spiral arms. Even considering longer integration times and/or other antenna configurations, the dusty spirals remain be- low the detection threshold. 4. Discussion 4.1. Grand-design dusty spirals We considered a new mechanism able to produce grand-design dusty spirals in transition discs. Remarkably, there is no need to include a massive planetary or stellar companion as in Dong et al. (2015). We only require a couple of diametrically opposed shadows cast at the inner rim of a transition disc as in Montesinos et al. (2016) and Facchini et al. (2018). The resulting gaseous grand-design spirals are able to trap dust of different sizes in the disc. Our calculations show that the dust particles with St∼ 1 are the ones that gather most efficiently in the spirals. Interestingly, these particles move towards the pressure maxima both from in- wards and outwards. This effect is not seen in the absence of shadows and the resulting spirals. Despite the similar morphol- ogy of our dusty spirals (cf. Fig. 7) with the ones observed by Pérez et al. (2016), our synthetic ALMA image shows that these shadow-triggered spirals cannot be detected at 1.3 mm. Hence, shadows are a promising mechanism to produce dusty spirals in disc but it is not possible to reproduce the observations of Elias 2-27. Moreover, Pérez et al. (2016) do not report any shadow detection. However, this mechanism should be considered for other transition discs exhibiting large cavities and shadows (e.g. HD 142527, HD 135344B and HD 100453). It is worth noting that we studied the evolution of shadow- triggered spirals for only 10 000 years, a time-scale too short to consider grain growth and fragmentation inside the spirals. Al- though our dust evolution code has a grain growth module, the Article number, page 10 of 15 typical grain growth time-scales in the region of interest exceed the simulation time by at least one order of magnitude. That is the reason why we neglected this phenomenon, even though we expect particles to collide and grow inside the spirals. Unfortu- nately, simulating the disc for a prolonged time is problematic due to the large number of snapshots we need to store in the memory. 4.2. Dust trapping and mixing In Section 3.2, we analysed the dust trapping by the shadow- triggered spirals in the gas. This phenomenon depends on the grain size and influences the dust dynamics in the disc dramati- cally. Figure 4 clearly shows that dust particles concentrate in the pressure maxima of the gas, which results into a dusty disc with spirals. The fact that particles are trapped in these over-densities, prevents these solid bodies to be accreted by the central star. In fact, in the absence of spirals, only particles with St ∼ 1 ex- perience an extremely fast radial-drift (Weidenschilling 1977). Eventually, these particles are lost onto the star, which renders planetesimal formation rather problematic in the disc. Because inside the spirals dust particles can gather and grow efficiently, these constitute remarkable "sweet spots" for grain growth in the disc. This gathering effect could lead to streaming instabilities at this particular location (Youdin & Goodman 2005; Johansen et al. 2007; Jacquet et al. 2011), but this effect has not been taken into account in our simulations. Provided that strong dust clump- ing happens, the radial-drift is slowed down in these over-dense regions. Once the self-gravity of the solids becomes important, this mechanism can lead to the formation of planetesimals (Jo- hansen et al. 2007, 2012). In addition to this effect, we expect an efficient mixing of dust species inside the spirals. In Figures 5 and 6 we observe a mixing of particles inside the spiral at ∼300 au and at ∼500, which initially started at different radial and azimuthal distances. In fact, particles with different initial Stokes number drift at dif- ferent radial velocities until they are trapped in the over-density. This happens both in the inward and outward direction. Once this happens, there is a broad dust size distribution in the spiral. N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs would produce even fainter spirals. Therefore, the disc model presented in this work should be seen as an optimistic scenario for this kind of spiral formation and detection. Interestingly, some recent techniques allow to extract struc- ture from noisy data well below the 5σ-threshold. For instance, in the context of galaxy observation, Akhlaghi & Ichikawa (2015) describe a method able to extract spiral arms at very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Contrary to other existing tech- niques, signal-related parameters (such as the image point spread function or known object models) are irrelevant for this method. Thus, assuming that this kind of dusty spirals form in Nature, some previous (sub-)millimetric detections may have missed them because of standard data reduction procedures. To our knowledge, this kind of observational signatures has not been observed with ALMA yet. However, based on our results, we are able to predict that, in presence of shadows, the thermal emission of the dust should exhibit faint grand-design spirals and signifi- cant dips (cf. Figure 7). Fig. 8: Synthetic observations with ALMA of Sha-r100 after 10 000 years. The beam is indicated in the bottom-left hand side. The fact that the trapped grains come from regions of the disc at different temperatures may result in different solid compositions (ices, volatile organics, refractory organics, silicates, iron, etc.). The mixing among different species is controlled by the numer- ator of Eq. 11, ρ and a, as discussed in Pignatale et al. (2017). In fact, a dense but small particle (ρd = 10 g cm−3, a = 0.1 mm) behaves in the same way as a lighter but larger particle (ρd = 1 g cm−3, a = 1 mm). This has dramatic effects on the resulting composition of solids in the disc, and also affects their further growth (Pignatale et al. 2017, and references therein). However, caution is required when interpreting our results given that we are considering an initial size distribution which does not depend on the radius. If we consider a disc with a re- alistic size segregation, then the emission from the outer regions at λ = 1.3 mm would be fainter and the one from the inner re- gions stronger. In fact, due to radial-drift, we expect to have a more compact radial distribution of millimetric grains compared to micron-sized ones. 4.3. Detectability of shadow-triggered dusty spirals In Figure 8 we report a synthetic ALMA observation corre- sponding to Sha-r100. Although the shadows are clearly detected as dips in the emission at 1.3 mm, the thermal emission from the spirals is comparable to the noise level. Hence, even for longer integration times, their emission will remain below the detec- tion limit. Unrealistically higher disc masses or dust-to-gas ratios could increase the thermal emission rendering such detections feasible. If the canonical value of 1% of the latter is in fact too conservative, then shadow-triggered spirals could potentially be observable. The size of the cavity also plays an important role. As a matter of fact, discs with smaller cavities have higher fluxes because of the presence of hotter material closer to the star. This decreases the flux ratio between the spiral arms and the inner disc, which makes the detection even more challenging. Conse- quently, transition discs exhibiting shadows are ideal targets to look for spiral patterns in the thermal emission. It is worth noting nevertheless that considering a lower disc mass (e.g. 1% M(cid:12)), 5. Conclusions In this work, we have developed a novel numerical tool, com- patible with fargo-adsg, to explore dust dynamics for hydrody- namical simulations in a consistent manner. Although we do not include the back-reaction of dust on gas, this does not affect our results given the dust-to-gas ratios considered here. The method- ology detailed in Section 2 allows to compute the evolution of the dust distribution and its resulting thermal emission. In this regard, this tool successfully bridges the gap between theory and observations. In fact, it is particularly well-suited to model some of the transitional discs exhibiting puzzling dust distributions (cf. Table 1). With the detection of dusty spirals in Elias 2-27 (Pérez et al. 2016) and the mechanism described in Montesinos et al. (2016) in mind, we explored the trapping of dust in discs with gaseous spirals due to illumination effects. In our case, the shadows are provoked by an inclined inner disc, which obstructs the stellar light at large radii. The main results of this work can be sum- marised as follows: -- The gaseous spiral waves induced by shadows are able to accumulate and trap dust particles. This mechanism deeply affects the fate and the evolution of the solid material in the disc. In fact, we showed that for mm to cm-sized particles it is possible to circumvent the radial-drift barrier. -- In our simulations, the most efficient trapping occurs for solids with sizes ranging from 1 mm to 1 cm. However, this size range strongly depends on the disc model considered (Laibe et al. 2012). -- The dust trapping that occurs inside the gaseous spirals re- sults in an efficient mixing of dust particles of different sizes and densities. This has deep implications for planetesimal and comet formation at large stellocentric distances, since spirals gather material from different regions of the disc. -- The obtained infrared (1.6 µm) and thermal (1.3 mm) emis- sions exhibit both shadows and spiral patterns in the disc. However, the brightness of the dusty spirals is too faint to explain the recent ALMA observations of Elias 2-27. The methodology presented here can be applied to explore dust dynamics in transition discs with vortices, multiple planets and moving shadows. By doing so, it is possible to produce ro- bust observational signatures of different physical processes at act. This will hopefully help observers to interpret their current and future dust detections. Article number, page 11 of 15 Pinilla, P., Benisty, M., & Birnstiel, T. 2012, A&A, 545, A81 Ribas, Á., Merín, B., Bouy, H., & Maud, L. T. 2014, A&A, 561, A54 Rice, W. K. M., Lodato, G., Pringle, J. E., Armitage, P. J., & Bonnell, I. A. 2004, Semenov, D., Henning, T., Helling, C., Ilgner, M., & Sedlmayr, E. 2003, A&A, MNRAS, 469, 237 MNRAS, 355, 543 410, 611 Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 Stolker, T., Dominik, C., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A113 Tomida, K., Machida, M. N., Hosokawa, T., Sakurai, Y., & Lin, C. H. 2017, ApJ, 835, L11 1199 van der Marel, N., Cazzoletti, P., Pinilla, P., & Garufi, A. 2016, ApJ, 832, 178 van der Marel, N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bruderer, S., et al. 2013, Science, 340, Vinkovi´c, D. 2014, A&A, 566, A117 Wagner, K., Apai, D., Kasper, M., & Robberto, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, L2 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Williams, J. P. & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67 Youdin, A. N. & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin, A. N. & Lithwick, Y. 2007, Icarus, 192, 588 Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., Güttler, C., Blum, J., & Dullemond, C. P. 2010, A&A, 513, A57 Zsom, A., Sándor, Z., & Dullemond, C. P. 2011, A&A, 527, A10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22 Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., & Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375 Paardekooper, S.-J. 2007, A&A, 462, 355 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Mellema, G. 2004, A&A, 425, L9 Paardekooper, S.-J. & Mellema, G. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 Pérez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2016, Science, 353, 1519 Pfalzner, S. 2003, ApJ, 592, 986 Pignatale, F. C., Gonzalez, J.-F., Cuello, N., Bourdon, B., & Fitoussi, C. 2017, Acknowledgements. We thank the two anonymous referees that have reviewed this manuscript for very constructive comments, which allowed us to enhance the quality of this work. NC acknowledges financial support provided by FONDE- CYT grant 3170680. NC, MM, and JC acknowledge financial support from Mil- lenium Nucleus grant RC130007 (Chilean Ministry of Economy). MM acknowl- edges support from the Millennium Science Initiative (Chilean Ministry of Econ- omy) and the CHINA-CONICYT fund, 4th call. SMS gratefully acknowledges support through the PUC-HD Graduate Student Exchange Fellowship, which is part of the academic exchange program between the Institute of Astrophysics of the Pontificia Universidad Católica (IA-PUC) and the Center for Astrophysics at the University of Heidelberg (ZAH), financed by the German Academic Ex- change Service (DAAD). This work was partly carried out while JC was on sab- batical leave at MPE. JC and NC acknowledge the kind hospitality of MPE, and funding from the Max Planck Society through a "Partner Group" grant. JC ac- knowledges support from CONICYT-Chile through FONDECYT (1141175) and Basal (PFB0609) grants, and from the ICM (Iniciativa Científica Milenio) via the Núcleo Milenio de Formación Planetaria grant. The Geryon/Geryon2 cluster housed at the Centro de Astro-Ingenieria UC was used for the calculations per- formed in this paper. The BASAL PFB-06 CATA, Anillo ACT-86, FONDEQUIP AIC-57, and QUIMAL 130008 provided funding for several improvements to the Geryon/Geryon2 cluster. References Akhlaghi, M. & Ichikawa, T. 2015, ApJS, 220, 1 Ayliffe, B. A., Laibe, G., Price, D. J., & Bate, M. R. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1450 Barge, P. & Sommeria, J. 1995, A&A, 295, L1 Baruteau, C. & Masset, F. 2008, ApJ, 678, 483 Baruteau, C. & Zhu, Z. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3927 Benisty, M., Juhasz, A., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, L6 Benisty, M., Stolker, T., Pohl, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A42 Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, A&A, 513, A79 Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Pinilla, P. 2013, A&A, 550, L8 Birnstiel, T., Fang, M., & Johansen, A. 2016, Space Sci. Rev., 205, 41 Blum, J. & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21 Bohren, C. F. & Huffman, D. R. 1983, Absorption and scattering of light by small Casassus, S., Wright, C. M., Marino, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 126 Christiaens, V., Casassus, S., Perez, S., van der Plas, G., & Ménard, F. 2014, ApJ, particles 785, L12 515, A70 1037 Edition, 398 Cuello, N., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Pignatale, F. C. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2140 Dai, F., Facchini, S., Clarke, C. J., & Haworth, T. J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1996 Dipierro, G., Pinilla, P., Lodato, G., & Testi, L. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 974 Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Rafikov, R. R., & Stone, J. M. 2015, ApJ, 809, L5 Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, T., Jaeger, C., & Mutschke, H. 1995, A&A, 300, 503 Dullemond, C. P., Juhasz, A., Pohl, A., et al. 2012, RADMC-3D: A multi- purpose radiative transfer tool, Astrophysics Source Code Library Dzyurkevich, N., Flock, M., Turner, N. J., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2010, A&A, Facchini, S., Juhász, A., & Lodato, G. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4459 Follette, K. B., Grady, C. A., Swearingen, J. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 132 Fouchet, L., Maddison, S. T., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Murray, J. R. 2007, A&A, 474, Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Fromang, S., Lyra, W., & Masset, F. 2011, A&A, 534, A107 Garufi, A., Quanz, S. P., Schmid, H. M., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A8 Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857 Gonzalez, J.-F., Laibe, G., & Maddison, S. T. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1984 Grady, C. A., Muto, T., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 48 Jacquet, E., Balbus, S., & Latter, H. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3591 Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Mac Low, M.-M., et al. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022 Johansen, A., Youdin, A. N., & Lithwick, Y. 2012, A&A, 537, A125 Kratter, K. & Lodato, G. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 271 Krauss, O. & Wurm, G. 2005, ApJ, 630, 1088 Kretke, K. A. & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, ApJ, 664, L55 Laibe, G., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Maddison, S. T. 2012, A&A, 537, A61 Marino, S., Perez, S., & Casassus, S. 2015, ApJ, 798, L44 Masset, F. 2000, A&AS, 141, 165 McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127 Meheut, H., Meliani, Z., Varniere, P., & Benz, W. 2012, A&A, 545, A134 Meru, F., Juhász, A., Ilee, J. D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, L24 Montesinos, M. & Cuello, N. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L35 Montesinos, M., Perez, S., Casassus, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, L8 Article number, page 12 of 15 N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs Appendix A: Irradiation versus accretion heating Here we aim to show that we can safely neglect the effect of the viscous heating in the disc. On the one hand, we consider the viscosity of the gaseous disc, which leads to the production of heat. The heating per gram of gas is proportional to the the viscosity coefficient ν and the square of the shear. In an accretion disc, the total heating per unit area, Qaccr + , reads: Qaccr + = Σν r dΩK dr = 9 4 ΣνΩ2 K . (A.1) (cid:32) (cid:33)2 Assuming a steady state disc, the accretion rate can be written as follows: M = 3πΣν. Thus, we obtain: Qaccr + = 3 4π MΩ2 K = 3G 4π MM∗ r3 . (A.2) On the other hand, the stellar heating directly depends on the amount of radiation received by the disc. The flux of stellar radi- ation at distance r from the star is given by F∗(r) = L∗ 4πr2 . The ir- radiating flux is the projection of this flux onto the surface of the disc and includes a factor sin(φ), which can be approximated by φ for small grazing angles. Typically, for a flared disc, φ ≈ 0.05. The disc receives radiation from the upper and the lower part, therefore there is a factor 2 as well. Finally, we get that the irra- diation heating per unit area, Qirr + , is given by: Qirr + = φ L∗ 2πr2 . (A.3) Fig. B.1: Initial and final radial temperature profiles for the Sha-r100 simulation. The range of temperature is consistent with Eq. 9. Hence, the criterion for which the irradiation heating dominates over the accretion one reads as follows: r ≥ 3G MM∗ 2φL∗ (A.4) . Plugging a reasonable value for the stellar accretion ( M = 10−7M∗), we obtain that r ≥ 11 au. This condition is fulfilled by our disc, so the viscous heating can be neglected. Appendix B: Disc temperature and Toomre parameter In Figs. B.1 and B.2 we show the initial and final values of the disc temperatures and the Toomre parameter, respectively. Be- cause the disc radiates energy during its evolution, the final tem- peratures are lower than the initial ones and are roughly com- prised between 12 and 5 K. This is consistent with the expected temperatures between 100 and 600 au for an irradiated disc (cf. Eq. 9). The Toomre parameter is defined as Q = csκf/πGΣ, where κf is the epicyclic frequency. This dimensionless quantity compares the strength of thermal pressure and shear (numerator) to self-gravity (denominator). If Q > 1 (Q < 1), then the system is (un)stable to its own gravity. In our simulations, the value of the Toomre parameter throughout the entire evolution remains everywhere above 1. Regions with Q values slightly above 1, which are found in our model, can be considered as marginally stable (Kratter & Lodato 2016). However, even in that regime, the perturbation introduced by the shadows dominates over self- gravity effects, leading to spiral formation (see Montesinos et al. 2016, for a more thorough discussion). Fig. B.2: Initial and final radial Toomre parameter profiles for the Sha-r100 simulation. Values above 1 correspond to gravitation- ally stable discs. This is the case for the disc model considered in this work. Appendix C: Numerical integration of the equations of motion As mentioned in Section 2.2, the expression of the Stokes num- ber used in the code is different than Eq. 11. In the dust code, we use the radial and the azimuthal gravitational accelerations given by fargo-adsg in order to compute the Stokes number. For a dust particle of index i, we have: Sti = π 2 (3Kn + 1)2 9Kn2 + gdrag + 3Kn kdrag a ri ζdust ρgas vK cs , (C.1) where Kn = λmfp/a is the Knudsen number, λmfp the mean free path of the gas and a the radius of the dust particle. ζ = 3.3 g cm−3 is the bulk mass density of the dust particles, and ρgas the mid-plane mass density of the gas. gdrag and kdrag are the drag coefficients in the Epstein and in the Stokes drag regimes, Article number, page 13 of 15 (cid:114) A&A proofs: manuscript no. dustyspirals respectively. They are given by: gdrag = and kdrag = m2 1 + 9π 128 (cid:114) 1 + 0.15 Re0.687 3.96 × 10−6 Re2.4 0.11 Re (cid:114) π 8 m Kn , Re is the Reynolds number, which is defined as: (C.2) (C.3) if Re ≤ 500 if 500 < Re ≤ 1500 if Re > 1500. Re = 3 (C.4) where m = ∆v/cs is the relative Mach number of the dust par- ticles to the gas. This rather complex method for calculation the Stokes number has the advantage that it automatically interpo- lates between the different drag regimes and is therefore more stable. We use a symplectic, first-order leapfrog method to integrate Eqs. 12 to 15. Equations containing the Stokes number are inte- grated implicitly. First, Eqs. 12 and 13 are integrated using only half of a time step ∆t. Omitting the particle index i, the integra- tion from the kth to the (k+1)th time-step is performed as follows: rk+1/2 = rk + θk+1/2 = θk + ∆t 2 ∆t 2 vr,k Lk r2 k . (C.5) (C.6) Then, Eqs. 14 and 15 are integrated with a full time-step and using the new values rk+ 1 : 2 k (cid:18) L2 (cid:16)− ∂Φ ∂θ r3 k+1/2 (cid:19) 2 + facc, r + vgas,r ΩK and θk+ 1 − ∂Φ 1 + ∆tΩK St + rk+1/2 facc,θ + vgas,θrk+1/2 ΩK ∂r St St 1 + ∆tΩK St (cid:17) (C.7) . (C.8) vr,k + ∆t vr,k+1 = Lk + ∆t Lk+1 = where facc,r and facc,θ are the gravitational accelerations in r and θ directions due to the gravitational potential of the disc, extracted from fargo-adsg. Finally, Eqs. 12 and 13 are integrated again with half of a time-step using Lk+1 and vr,k+1 in the following way: Rk+1 = Rk+1/2 + θk+1 = θk+1/2 + ∆t 2 ∆t 2 vr,k+1 Lk+1/2 R2 k+1/2 . (C.9) (C.10) To ensure the accuracy of this method, every quantity is lin- early interpolated onto the location of the dust particle. To be sta- ble, the particles perform several time-steps between two fargo- adsg outputs. Between two outputs, the gas quantities are lin- early interpolated in time. To be as precise as possible, two con- secutive fargo-adsg snapshots should not lie too far apart. As a rule of thumb, ten or more snapshots per orbit at the inner bound- ary of the system are enough for this numerical scheme. Furthermore, a random walk term can be added to simulate the turbulent diffusion of the dust. If activated, after every time- step, the particles are displaced by a length lturb in a random Article number, page 14 of 15 direction. The distance of displacement is given by Youdin & Lithwick (2007) as: lturb = ∆t αH2ΩK 1 + St2 . (C.11) This option is turned off in all the simulations presented here. Appendix D: Benchmark of the dust evolution code To prove that the equations of motions are integrated accurately, we performed simulations of several test scenarios. In all cases, we kept the gas parameters constant with a surface density of (cid:17)−1 and a temperature profile of T(r) = (cid:17)−1/2. We consider a disc orbiting a 1 M(cid:12) star. For an Σ(r) = 1700 g cm−2×(cid:16) r 150 K×(cid:16) r 1 au axisymmetric disc, the radial evolution of a given dust particle of index i is governed by: 1 au vgas,r 2 uP ri = 1 + St2 − St + St−1 , ∂ ∂t where uP is the maximum particle drift velocity caused by the sub-Keplerian gas (Birnstiel et al. 2016). In a fixed gas disc, the particle's radial evolution is solely dependent on the particle's Stokes number. (D.1) To check whether the code is stable and correct for a broad variety of Stokes numbers, we performed four test scenarios. In three cases we kept the Stokes number of the particles constant at 10−100, 10100 and 1. In the first case, the particles are com- pletely coupled to the gas and are therefore being accreted with the radial gas velocity vgas,r. In the second case, the particles are completely decoupled from the gas, are on Keplerian orbits and do not change their radial position. In the third case with St = 1, the particles experience the maximum radial drift velocity of 1 2 vgas,r + uP. We also performed a fourth test case where we did not fix the Stokes number at all. Here, the Stokes number will decrease with time as the particles drift to regions with higher surface densities. Figure D.1 shows the radial evolution of selected test parti- cles in each of the four scenarios with blue lines. We also directly integrated Eq. D.1 for all cases and over-plotted the expected particle tracks with broad gray lines. The top left shows a par- ticle with a very small Stokes number. It is perfectly coupled to the gas and is accreted with the radial gas velocity. The particle on the top right has a very high Stokes number and is therefore on an Keplerian orbit. Its radial position does not change at all. The particle on the bottom left has a Stokes number of unity and is accreted with the maximum drift velocity. Due to our choice of the surface density and temperature profiles, this drift velocity is constant with radial distance from the star. The gas velocity can be neglected here. The particle on the bottom right has a variable Stokes number that decreases with decreasing distance from the star due to higher surface densities in the inner disc. Therefore, the particle's radial velocity decreases slightly over time. Both, the results from the particle simulation and the direct integration match perfectly. We therefore conclude that the particle code is stable for all Stokes numbers and returns the correct results. N. Cuello et al.: Dusty spirals triggered by shadows in transition discs Fig. D.1: Test cases of the particle simulation. Comparison of the radial evolution for test particles in four different scenarios. The results obtained with our dust code are colored in blue, while those obtained through the direct integration of Eq. D.1 are colored in gray. From top to bottom and from left to right, we plot 4 different cases: St = 10−100, St = 10100, St = 1, and variable Stokes numbers. The gas disc does not evolver in any of these test cases. Article number, page 15 of 15
1904.09453	1	1904	2019-04-20T15:10:56	3-micron Reflectance Spectroscopy of Carbonaceous Chondrites under Asteroid-like Conditions	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We measured 3-micron reflectance spectra of 21 meteorites that represent all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections. The measurements were conducted at the Laboratory for Spectroscopy under Planetary Environmental Conditions (LabSPEC) at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU APL) under vacuum and thermally-desiccated conditions (asteroid-like conditions). This is the most comprehensive 3-micron dataset of carbonaceous chondrites ever acquired in environments similar to the ones experienced by asteroids. The 3-micron reflectance spectra are extremely important for direct comparisons with and appropriate interpretations of reflectance data from ground-based telescopic and spacecraft observations of asteroids. We found good agreement between 3-{\mu}m spectral characteristics of carbonaceous chondrites and carbonaceous chondrite classifications. The 3-{\mu}m band is diverse, indicative of varying composition, thus suggesting that these carbonaceous chondrites experienced distinct parent body aqueous alteration and metamorphism environments.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	3-μm Reflectance Spectroscopy of Carbonaceous Chondrites under Asteroid-like Conditions Driss Takir1,; Karen R. Stockstill-Cahill2; Charles A. Hibbitts2, Yusuke Nakauchi3 1Jacobs/ARES, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston TX 77058-3696, USA 2Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland 20273, USA 3JAXA Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Sagamihara, Japan Corresponding author email: [email protected] Editorial correspondence to: Driss Takir Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division NASA Johnson Space Center 2101 NASA Parkway Building 36, Room 126 Houston TX 77058-3696 Pages: 24 Tables: 2 Figures: 27 1 Abstract We measured 3-μm reflectance spectra of 21 meteorites that represent all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections. The measurements were conducted at the Laboratory for Spectroscopy under Planetary Environmental Conditions (LabSPEC) at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU APL) under vacuum and thermally-desiccated conditions (asteroid-like conditions). This is the most comprehensive 3-µm dataset of carbonaceous chondrites ever acquired in environments similar to the ones experienced by asteroids. The 3-µm reflectance spectra are extremely important for direct comparisons with and appropriate interpretations of reflectance data from ground-based telescopic and spacecraft observations of asteroids. We found good agreement between 3-μm spectral characteristics of carbonaceous chondrites and carbonaceous chondrite classifications. The 3-μm band is diverse, indicative of varying composition, thus suggesting that these carbonaceous chondrites experienced distinct parent body aqueous alteration and metamorphism environments. The spectra of CI chondrites, from which significant amount of water adsorbed under ambient conditions was removed, are consistent with Mg-serpentine and clay minerals. The high abundances of organics in CI chondrites is also associated with the mineralogy of these chondrites, oxyhydroxides- and complex clay minerals-rich. CM chondrites, which are cronstedtite-rich, have shallower 3-µm band than CI chondrites, suggesting they experienced less aqueous alteration. CR chondrites showed moderate aqueous alteration relative to CI and CM chondrites. CV chondrites, except for Efremovka, have a very shallow 3-µm band, consistent with their lower phyllosilicate proportions. CO chondrites, like most CVs, have a very shallow 3-µm band that suggest they experienced minor aqueous alteration. The 3-µm band in CH/CBb is deep and broad centered ~ 3.11 µm, possibly due to the high abundance of FeNi metal and presence of heavily hydrated clasts in these chondrites. The 3-µm spectra of Essebi (C2-ung) and EET 83226 are more consistent with CM chondrites' spectra. The 3-µm spectra of Tagish lake (C2-ung), on the other hand, are consistent with CI chondrites. None of these spectral details could have been resolved without removing the adsorbed water before acquiring spectra. 2 Introduction This investigation completes work begun under Takir et al. (2013) that explored 10 samples of CM and CI carbonaceous chondrite types. In this paper we expand that study, investigating 21 more samples that represent all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections, including CI, CM, CR, CV, CO, CH, CB, CK, and C2-ung chondrites. With this complete investigation of the 3-μm band under vacuum and thermally- desiccated conditions (asteroid-like conditions), we can better constrain the mineralogy and understand the association of hydrated minerals with organics (and other chemical compounds) on the surface of carbonaceous asteroids, and therefore provide valuable constraints on the current dynamical and thermal theories of the formation and evolution of the early solar system. Most previous spectroscopic studies of meteorites focused on the 0.35-2.5 μm spectral region, which is not strongly affected by atmospheric water contamination (e.g., Johnson and Fanale 1973, Gaffey 1974, Salisbury et al. 1975, Cloutis et al.2011a, 2012b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, 2012e, 2012f). Here we present the first comprehensive 3-μm dataset of carbonaceous chondrites that includes important absorption features (e.g., hydroxyl, organics, carbonates) and requires that the spectroscopic measurements to be done in asteroid-like conditions for direct comparison with ground- and space-based observations. Carbonaceous chondrites provide important clues about the formation and evolution of the early solar system because they are widely thought to be unaltered by extensive melting and differentiation of their parent bodies (Van Schmus and Wood 1967). Remote sensing is considered a powerful tool for linking carbonaceous chondrites with their possible asteroid parent bodies, providing more information on the petrological and geochemical environments in which these asteroids were formed. JAXA's Hayabusa2 and NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft have rendezvoused with asteroids (162173) Ryugu (Watanable et al. 2019) and (10955) Bennu (Lauretta et al. 2018), respectively, both are thought to be carbonaceous asteroids and are expected to contain water and/or organics. These two missions confirmed the presence of hydrated minerals on these two carbonaceous asteroids. Since it is not possible to return samples to Earth from every small body in the solar system, the information obtained from remote sensing data (ground- or space-based) is important to characterize the surface composition of these bodies. Studying carbonaceous chondrites is also important for sampling and landing site characterization and selections for the few sample return missions and human exploration missions. Furthermore, the study of carbonaceous chondrites will help place the analysis of the returned samples from carbonaceous small bodies in a broader 'solar system' context. 3 The integrated area of the 3-μm band is sensitive to the amount of hydrated minerals and/or water content in carbonaceous chondrites (e.g., Miyamoto and Zolensky 1994). Previous studies used reflectance spectra of carbonaceous chondrites measured in ambient conditions to derive 3-μm spectral parameters, such as, band center, band depth, and band area, which were later used to estimate the H/Si ratio for asteroids (e.g., Sato et al. 1997). Takir et al. (2013) using meteorites and Milliken and Mustard (2007) using clays spectra showed, however, that ambient conditions can affect the calculation of spectral parameters of the 3-μm band, and hence the interpretation of remote sensing spectra around this band, due to the contamination by significant amounts of adsorbed atmospheric water. In this study we measured infrared (IR) reflectance spectra of carbonaceous chondrites in vacuum and room temperature after overnight heating at T ~ 375 K to minimize the presence of adsorbed atmospheric water. The relatively low temperature at which we heated the samples, avoided mineral alteration (e.g., Milliken and Mustard 2007) that could otherwise be relevant to carbonaceous chondrites at T > 400 K (e.g., Tonui et al. 2011). Methodology 1. Samples We carefully selected our meteorite samples for this study, all of them are falls except for five meteorites (Table 1). MIL15328, DOM 10085, and EET83226 were recovered from Antarctica, with weathering grades of B, C, and A/B, respectively. NWA 4964 and SAU 290 are desert meteorites that were recovered in Morocco and Oman, respectively, with a moderate weathering grade. We ground meteorite chips (100-150 mg) into fine powders (~100 m), using a dry ceramic mortar and pestle. Because we got the samples as a loan and were limited by the sample sizes, we could not sieve the meteorite samples and precisely measure their grain size distributions. 4 Table 1. We measured 3-µm spectra of 21 carbonaceous chondrites in vacuum and thermally- desiccated, covering all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections. Meteorite* Type/Weathering grade Meteorite* Type/Weathering grade Alais Orgueil Murchison Crescent Banten Murray Al Rais CI1 CI1 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM 2 CR2 MIL 15328 CR2/B DOM 10085 CR2/C Allende Efremovka CV3 CV3 Mokoia Vigarano Felix Warrenton NWA 4964 SAU 290 CV3 CV3 CO3.3 CO3.7 CK3/B CH3/B Isheyevo CH/CBb EET 83226** C2-ung/A/B Essebi C2-ung Tagish Lake C2-ung Meteorite information from the Meteoritical Bulletin Database. (https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/). A = minor rustiness; B = moderate rustiness; C = major rustiness. These meteorites are finds. 2. Spectroscopic laboratory measurements procedure We measured bidirectional reflectance spectra (incidence = 15o, emission = 45o, phase angle = 60o) of carbonaceous chondrites at the Laboratory for Spectroscopy under Planetary Environmental Conditions (LabSPEC) at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU APL) under vacuum- and thermally-desiccated conditions, following the methodology used in Takir et al. (2013). Spectra were measured from ~0.8 to ~ 8 µm using a high-vacuum chamber system (10-6 to 10-7 torr) with a Bruker Vertex 70 FTIR spectrometer and an external liquid-nitrogen cooled MCT detector. Samples were placed in the copper sample holder and retained in place with a 1 mm-thick MgF2 window. A diffuse gold plate mounted immediately below the sample holder was used as the IR reflectance standard, and a thermocouple embedded in the sample provided an accurate temperature measurement. After placing the sample in the holder and securing the window over the sample, the holder was 5 installed onto the cryostat inside the chamber. After installing the holder with sample in it into the chamber, a spectrum is obtained under 'ambient' conditions, with the sample exposed to the laboratory environment. Next, the chamber was sealed and evacuated, and spectra of the initially desiccated sample were obtained. However, much adsorbed water generally remained in samples, so they were baked out. While under vacuum, a resistive heater warmed the back of the copper holder and thus the sample for removing adsorbed water. Sample temperature reached ~ 375K (which is consistent with the warmest temperature near-Earth and Main Belt asteroids experience) for ~ 10 to 12 hours overnight (Delbo and Michel 2011). Then in the following day, the heater was turned off, and spectra were taken again under vacuum after the sample had cooled. 3. Spectral analysis For our spectral analysis and band parameters calculations, we used a standard technique described in Cloutis et al. (1986). The 3-µm band was isolated and then divided by a straight-line continuum, which was determined by two reflectance maxima just shortward of the absorption 2.60-2.65 µm and just longward of the absorption 3.5-3.85 µm. To be consistent with the asteroid spectral analysis (Takir and Emery 2012, Takir et al. 2015), the band depths for chondrites spectra were computed at ~2.90 µm relative to the linear continuum that was calculated from a linear regression of data from 1.95-2.5 µm. This formulation (K-band) is defined as: D2.90 = 1- (R2.90 / Rc) (1), where R2.90 is the reflectance at ~2.90 µm, and Rc is the reflectance of the continuum at the same wavelength as R2.90 as interpolated via the calculated linear continuum (Figure 1). We then calculated the band areas by integrating the spectral curve below the straight-line: 𝐴 Band Area = ∫ 𝐵 R(𝜆) R𝑐(𝜆) 𝑑𝜆 (2). We used an average of five measurements of band maxima determined by choosing band continua A: 2.60-2.65 µm and B: 3.5-3.85 µm. The band centers were calculated by applying a sixth-order polynomial fit to the central part of 3-µm band minima and finding the wavelength corresponding to the minimum reflectance for that fit. Uncertainty for band area and center measurements is expressed as a 2σ standard deviation of the fit of the function to the data. For spectra with sufficiently well-defined organics absorption around 3.4-3.5 µm, we subtracted 6 those organics band area from the overall 3-µm band area to improve the accuracy of the measurements of the integrated band area. Figure 1. The 2.9-µm band depth was calculated relative to the continuum, the linear regression line across the 1.95-2.5 µm spectral region (K-band). This method is consistent with the methods used for ground-based spectra of asteroids (Takir and Emery 2012, Takir et al. 2015). Results Figure 2 shows IR reflectance spectra of 21 carbonaceous chondrites included in this study. Two CI chondrites (Alais, Orgueil) are shown in Figures 2a-b, spectra of four CM chondrites (Murchison, Crescent, Banten, and Murray) in Figures 2c-f, spectra of three CR chondrites (Al Rais, MIL 15328, DOM 10085) in Figures 2g-i, spectra of four CV chondrites (Allende, Efremovka, Mokoia, Vigarano) in Figures 2j-m, spectra of two CO chondrites (Felix, Warrenton) in Figures 2n-o, spectrum of one CK chondrite (NWA 4964) in Figure 2p, spectra of two CH/CB chondrites (SAU 290, Isheyevo) in Figures 2q-r , and spectra of three C2-ung chondrites (Tagish lake, EET 83226, Essebi) in Figures 2s-u. All spectra were normalized to unity at 2.2 µm and represent measurements that were conducted at ambient conditions (gray curves) and measurements conducted in vacuum and thermally-desiccated (black curves). Table 2 shows the 3-µm band parameters (band center, depth, and area), derived using the techniques discussed in the methodology section, for the 21 carbonaceous chondrites spectra measured in vacuum and thermally-desiccated conditions in this study. 7 8 9 Figure 2. a-u. Average IR reflectance spectra of CI, CM, CR, CV, CO, CK, CH, CB, and C2- ung chondrites measured at ambient (blue curves), and asteroid-like conditions (vacuum and thermally-desiccated conditions) (black curves). All spectra have been normalized to unity at 2.2 µm. 10 Table 2. 3-µm band parameters for carbonaceous chondrite spectra measured in asteroid-like (vacuum and thermally-desiccated) conditions. Meteorite Figure 2 3- µm band 2.9- µm band 3- µm band center (µm) depth (%) area (µm-1) Alais Orgueil Murchison Crescent Banten Murray Al Rais MIL 15328 DOM 10085 Allende Efremovka Mokoia Vigarano Felix Warrenton NWA 4964 SAU 290 Isheyevo EET 83226 Essebi Tagish Lake Discussion 2.714±0.007 2.713±0.001 2.796±0.004 2.792±0.003 2.799±0.003 2.797±0.003 2.745±0.004 2.768±0.001 2.949±0.005 2.898±0.016 21.73 27.80 29.35 26.65 9.65 30.66 15.07 33.51 15.76 3.62 0.119±0.004 0.169±0.004 0.152±0.016 0.131±0.002 0.051±0.002 0.162±0.006 0.090±0.002 0.196±0.005 0.075±0.002 0.010±0.001 3.111±0.007 29.63 0.165±0.004 a b c d e f g h i j k l 2.893±0.022 m 2.887±0.019 n o p q r s t u 2.881±0.006 2.923±0.039 3.064±0.015 3.108±0.016 2.905±0.015 2.834±0.015 2.736±0.008 2.723 0.004 5.20 6.14 4.12 4.56 19.53 37.54 20.88 16.39 15.79 16.79 0.032±0.002 0.039±0.003 0.017±0.004 0.024±0.001 0.098±0.007 0.302±0.006 0.110±0.009 0.085±0.010 0.087±0.006 0.061±0.006 1. Importance of measuring 3-µm reflectance spectra of carbonaceous chondrites under asteroid-like conditions In this work, we focused on the 2-4 µm spectral region that exhibits important diagnostic absorption features, including the water and organics features. Comparisons with reflectance spectra of asteroids that have being measured in space require that we measure meteorite reflectance spectra under asteroid-like conditions in the laboratory. At ambient 11 conditions (room temperature and pressure), the 2-4 µm spectral region is significantly contaminated with adsorbed atmospheric water, which severely affect the calculations of features' spectral parameters (e.g., band center, band shape, band area), and hence, the mineralogical and chemical interpretation of meteorite spectra and their comparisons with asteroid spectra. In some meteorite spectra, adsorbed water can spectrally mask absorption features (e.g., organics, carbonates). Figure 3 shows IR reflectance spectra of a carbonaceous chondrite, Alais, measured at ambient temperature and pressure (gray curve), in vacuum under ambient temperature (dash dot black curve), and in vacuum and slightly elevated temperature at 375K (solid black curve). This figure clearly demonstrates the effects of removing adsorbed water on the spectral parameters. For example, the 3-µm band area decreased from BA=0.341 µm-1 in ambient conditions to BA=0.119 µm-1 in asteroid-like conditions. In addition, the organic absorption (~3.4-3.5 µm) increased from BA=0.007 µm-1 in ambient conditions to BA=0.010 µm-1 in asteroid-like conditions. Figure 3. IR spectra of a carbonaceous chondrite, CI Alais, measured under ambient pressure and temperature (solid gray curve), immediately after exposure to vacuum and while at ambient temperature (dash dot black curve), and under asteroid-like (vacuum and thermally-desiccated) conditions (solid black curve). The shape and intensity of the 3-µm band, including the organics features around 3.4-3.5 µm, is enormously affected by adsorbed water due to the atmospheric contamination in laboratory at ambient conditions. In vacuum and at T = 375K, the organics features become more pronounced and intense. Note the significant spectral effect of adsorbed 12 water in the sample measured under ambient conditions. In general, meteorite spectra show three fundamental vibrations of the water molecule that occur near 3 µm (ν1 symmetric and ν3 asymmetric OH stretches) and at ~6 µm (ν2 H-O-H bend). The 3-um band is sensitive to both hydroxyl and molecular water, whereas the 6-µm band is only affected by molecular water. Both bands are significantly affected by atmospheric (adsorbed) water. To ensure that most or all of adsorbed water is removed from our samples, we heated the sample until the 6-µm band went away, and so ν3 asymmetric OH stretch that is due to water contamination in the laboratory (Figure 4). The fact that heating to only 375K was sufficient to remove all molecular water, implies the molecular water is adsorbed and not bound into the mineral structure and also the ease of desiccation suggests all molecular water is likely terrestrial contamination. Any structural water (i.e., hydroxyl groups) in meteorites is not affected at these temperatures (Takir et al. 2013). Figure 4. IR reflectance spectra of MIL 15328 measured at JHU APL's LabSPEC, covering the 0.8-8 µm spectral range. There is a significant difference (in the 3-µm and 6-µm water bands) between the spectrum that was measured under ambient conditions (gray curve) and asteroid-like (vacuum and thermally-desiccated) conditions (black curve). For direct comparison with ground- and space-based data, meteorite spectra need to be measured in asteroid-like conditions. For confirming there is no residual molecular water (H2O), the 6-µm band needs to be measured. 2. Diversity in the 3-μm band in carbonaceous chondrites In this work we included 21 chondrites that represent all carbonaceous chondrite 13 types available in terrestrial meteorite collections. We found that the 3-μm band is diverse for these samples, suggesting their parent bodies experienced distinct aqueous alteration environments (Figure 5). We derived a very good correlation (R2=0.91) between the band area and the band depth at 2.90 μm (Figure 6). However, we did not find a very good correlation between the 3-μm band shape and carbonaceous chondrite types. In general, we found a good and qualitative agreement with the petrological classification and the degree of aqueous alteration of carbonaceous chondrites and their 3-μm band parameters (e.g., band area, band center).Overall, as the aqueous alteration increases the 3-μm band becomes deeper and the band center shifts to longer wavelengths. Figure 5 shows this study's spectra in addition to Takir et al. (2013)'s spectra. MIL 00740, a CM2 chondrite with the shallowest and narrowest 3-μm band, is an exception as shown in Figure 5. This chondrite is one of the rare CM chondrites that show pronounced and well-defined olivine and pyroxene absorptions features, indicating it has a high fraction of anhydrous silicates and suggesting it experienced a minor degree of aqueous alteration (Takir et al. 2013). Figure 5. IR reflectance spectra of all studied carbonaceous chondrites covering all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections, including CI, CM, CR, CV, CO, CH, CB, CK, and C2 ungrouped chondrites. This figure also includes spectra of the 10 CM and CI chondrites studied in Takir et al. (2013). Spectra were measured under asteroid-like (vacuum and thermally-desiccated) conditions. The 3-µm band center increases 14 with increasing alteration. Band shape and center changes with degree of aqueous alterations. Figure 6. We found a good correlation between the 3-μm band area (BA) and 2.90-μm band depth (BD2.90). In this plot, we combined data from this study and the study of Takir et al. (2013). CI carbonaceous chondrites The 3-μm spectra of CI chondrites are distinct from all chondrite types' spectra with a deep and wide band in ambient conditions. This band became shallower, and the narrow shorter wavelength band (centered ~2.71 µm) is emphasized after driving off adsorbed water from the sample. We find the significant change between ambient and asteroid-like spectra in CI chondrites (due to the substantial adsorbed water) to be more likely associated with the presence of FeO as oxyhydroxides and complex clay minerals in these chondrites. Berlanga et al. (2016) noted a similar trend for CI chondrites after performing CO2 gas adsorption experiments on various carbonaceous chondrite types. Additionally, CI chondrites spectrally show high abundances of organics, higher than any other carbonaceous chondrite type in this study. There is a possible association between the mineralogy of CI chondrites (oxyhydroxides- and clays-rich) and the high abundances of organics, which became more defined and pronounced in asteroid-like conditions (Figure 3).These results are supported by the findings of Pearson et al. (2002), who reported that organic material is 15 strongly associated with the phyllosilicate-rich matrix in carbonaceous chondrites. The asteroid-like spectrum of Alais exhibits a very narrow 3-µm-band centered at ~2.71 µm, consistent with Ivuna (CI1) spectra measured by Takir et al. 2013. These authors found that Ivuna is highly altered and its spectra are characterized by 3-μm band centers at shorter wavelengths, consistent with the presence of expandable clays (e.g., saponite) and Mg- serpentine (e.g., lizardite, chrysotile). Spectra of Alais show that it underwent less aqueous alteration than Ivuna because Alais has a shallower 3-µm band. Endress and Bischoff (1996) also concluded that Alais experienced less aqueous alteration than Ivuna because of the lower abundance of carbonates in Alais. Orgueil exhibits a similar 3-µm-band, centered ~2.71 µm, to the one found in Alais and Ivuna. However, the 3-µm-band in Orgueil is deeper, suggesting it experienced more aqueous alteration than Alais and Ivuna. This result is an agreement with Brearley and Martin (1992), who reported that Orgueil underwent more aqueous alteration than Alais and Ivuna on the basis of the depletion of Ca in their matrices. According to these authors, Ca is progressively leached from the matrix material to produce carbonate veins as a function of increased aqueous alteration. Endress and Bishoff (1996) also reported higher abundance of magnetite in Orgueil relative to Alais, providing more evidence that Orgueil experience more aqueous alteration. 2.1. CM carbonaceous chondrites We found spectra of CM chondrites to have shallower 3-µm bands relative to CI chondrites, suggesting they experienced less aqueous alteration, which is in agreement with Takir et al. (2013). The authors found that CM chondrites are characterized by 3-μm band centers at longer wavelengths relative to Ivuna (CI1), consistent with the presence of Mg- serpentine (e.g., antigorite) and Fe-serpentine (cronstedtite), a serpentine for which Fe3+ substitutes some Si in the tetrahedral site. The 3-µm spectra of Murchison were found to be consistent with the CM chondrites studied in Takir et al. (2013). Murchison has a 3-µm band centered at longer wavelength (~2.80 µm), more likely due to the contribution of cronstedtite. Bunch and Cheng (1980) and Bland et al. (2014) also detected cronstedtite in Murchison using electron microprobe analysis and XRD analysis, respectively. Similarly, to Murchison, spectra of Crescent, Banten, and Murray exhibit a 3-µm band that is centered ~2.80 µm. Burns and Fisher (1991) found that cronstdetite (with Fe2+ in the octahedral site and Fe3+ in the octahedral and tetrahedral sites) proportions in Murray is lower than Murchison. Banten has a shallower 3-µm band, suggesting it experienced less aqueous alteration relative to Murchison, Crescent, and Murray. Using PSD-XRD analyses 16 (the ratio of total phyllosilicate to total anhydrous Fe, Mg silicate), Howard et al. (2011) found that Murray experienced higher degree of aqueous alteration than Murchison. This is in agreement with the 3-µm-band area and depth calculated for Murray (BA=0.162 µm-1, D2.90= 30.60 %) and Murchison (BA=0.152 µm-1, D2.90 = 29.35%). 2.2. CR carbonaceous chondrites Like CI and CM chondrites, CR chondrites are characterized by the presence of phyllosilicates. However, the abundances of phyllosilicates in most CR chondrites are lower relative to CI and CM chondrites (Van Schmus and Wood 1967, McSween 1977a, Weisberg et al. 1993). We measured 3-µm spectra of three CR chondrites: Al Rais, MIL 15328, and DOM 10085. The measured spectra of CR chondrites are consistent with a moderate degree of aqueous alteration in CR chondrites, which is thought to be moderate relative to CI and CM chondrites. 2.3. CV carbonaceous chondrites We measured 3-µm spectra of 4 CV carbonaceous chondrites: two oxidized CVs, Allende and Mokoia, and two reduced CVs, Vigarano and Efremova. CV chondrites are thought to be affected by metamorphism (McSween 1977a, McSween 1979), providing important information about heating events of primitive materials in early Solar System. Using Mossbauer spectrometry of Allende and Vigarano, Bland et al (2002) concluded that oxidized CVs can be distinguished from reduced CVs by the higher volume of magnetite. Howard et al. (2015), however, found that the reduced vs. oxidized classification in CV chondrites may not be reflected in magnetite abundances. Using position sensitive detector X-ray diffraction (PSD- XRD) analyses, these authors found that metal abundances are greater in reduced CVs in which sulfides contains less Ni and can be used as a more effective discriminator between the two CV subgroups. Except for Efremovka, we found all CV chondrites to have a 3-µm band that is very shallow (2.90-µm band depth of 4-6%), in agreement with Buseck and Hua (1993), who reported that phyllosilicate proportions in CV chondrites are very lower relative to the CI, CM, and CR chondrites. Efremovka, a reduced CV, is unique in that it has a broader 3-µm band (centered ~ 3.11 µm) and a deeper 2.90-µm band (~29%). This broad 3-µm band could be attributed to aqueous alteration and/or the presence of metal. 2.4. CO Carbonaceous Chondrites We measured 3-µm spectra of two CO chondrites: Felix and Warrenton. 17 Like three of most CV chondrites in this study, Felix and Warrenton have very shallow and broad 3-µm band (4-5 %), centered ~2.90 µm, suggesting they experienced minor aqueous alteration. McSween (1977b) found that Warrenton is more metamorphosed than Felix. However, we found Felix's 3-µm band to be slightly shallower (BA = 0.017 µm-1, D2.90= 4.11 µm) compared with Warrenton's 3-µm band (BA=0.024 µm-1, D2.90= 4.56 µm). 2.5. CK Carbonaceous Chondrites NWA 4964 was the only CK chondrite in this study (and one of the rarest carbonaceous chondrites in general) and is the only meteorite that shows significant absorptions at approximately 1 µm and 2 µm, which are due to Fe2+ in the M1 and M2 crystallographic sites in olivine and pyroxene (Burns 1993). This indicates that NWA has a high fraction of anhydrous silicates. However, the high abundance of anhydrous silicates is not consistent with the 2.90- µm band depth of 19.53% that suggests NWA 4964 experienced a high degree of aqueous alteration and includes high phyllosilicates abundance. This discrepancy is possibly due to the moderate weathering grade of this dessert meteorite; the large amount of phyllosilicates and deep absorption band may be terrestrial alteration. This meteorite has a 3-µm spectrum similar to Efremovka, the only CV in this study that exhibits a broad feature centered ~3.06 µm with a 2.90-µm band depth of ~20%. 2.6. CH/CBb Carbonaceous Chondrites Two 3-µm spectra of CH and CB chondrites (SAU 290 and Isheyevo) were measured in this study. SAU 290 was classified as a CH3 chondrite, which is characterized by high FeNi metal abundance and the presence of heavily hydrated lithic clasts (Krot et al. 2003). Isheyevo, on the other hand, includes several lithologies ranging from metal-poor to metal-rich. It was classified as a CH/CBb chondrite because of its metal-poor lithology that is texturally and mineralogically consistent with CH chondrites and its metal-rich lithology that resembles CBb's lithology (Ivanova et al. 2008). The 3-µm band in SAU 290 is unique in that it exhibits the deepest (D2.90 = 38%) and broadest 3-µm band (centered ~3.11 µm) among all chondrites in this study. This is possibly because of the presence of heavily hydrated clasts and high abundance of FeNi metal in this chondrite. 3-µm spectra of Isheyevo also show a wide 3-µm band (centered ~2.90 µm), possibly due to FeNi metal, but shallower 3-µm band depth (D2.90 = 21%) relative to SAU 290. 2.7.C2-ung carbonaceous chondrites It is possible that some ungrouped chondrites in terrestrial meteorite collection belong to 18 the eight established previously discussed in this paper. However, they have not been thoroughly analyzed to be given a definitive classification (Cloutis et 2012f). Here we measured 3-µm spectra of three ungrouped chondrites: EET 83226, Essebi, and Tagish Lake. Essebi exhibits a 3-µm band that is very similar to Murchison and Murray, two CM chondrites. Howard et al. (2011) found that the C2-ung Essebi has lower degree of aqueous alteration than Murchison and Murray, using PSD-XRD analyses. This is in agreement with the 3-µm band parameters calculated for these chondrites. The 3-µm band in EET 83226 is broader, with a band center of 2.83 µm, and shallower relative to the 3-µm band in Essebi. This suggests that EET 83226 includes more Fe-serpentine and experienced less aqueous alteration. Tagish Lake was found to have four distinct lithologies: carbonate-poor, carbonate-rich, inclusion-poor magnetite- and sulfide-rich, and carbonate-rich, siderite-dominated (Zolensky et al., 2002, Izawa et al. 2010). In asteroid-like conditions, the 3-µm spectrum of Tagish Lake is characterized by a sharp band centered at ~2.72 µm, making it more consistent with CI chondrites. No strong carbonate CO3 absorptions were found at the 3.4-3.5 µm and 3.8-4.0 µm regions in the studied Tagish Lake sample. Like CI chondrites, Tagish lake shows significant change between ambient and asteroid-like spectra (due to the substantial adsorbed water), more likely associated with the presence of FeO as oxyhydroxides and complex clay minerals. Summary and Conclusions We measured 3-µm reflectance spectra under asteroid-like conditions (vacuum and thermally-desiccated) of 21 chondrites covering all carbonaceous chondrite types available in terrestrial meteorite collections. With these high-vacuum laboratory spectroscopic measurements, we were able to simulate the asteroid environments and minimize the amount of adsorbed terrestrial water on samples, which affects spectral interpretations. Our study revealed that the 3-μm band in the spectra of the desiccated meteorites is diverse for the 21 studied carbonaceous chondrites, suggesting their parent bodies experienced distinct secondary process environments (aqueous alteration, metamorphism). We found an agreement between the 3-μm spectral characteristics of carbonaceous chondrites and carbonaceous chondrite classifications. These results are important for direct comparisons with and appropriate interpretation of reflectance spectra from ground-based telescopic and spacecraft observations. CI chondrites have a very narrow 3-µm-band centered at ~2.71 µm, consistent with Mg-serpentine and clay minerals. CI chondrites were found to be affected by substantial amount of adsorbed water from laboratory atmospheric contamination that desorbed under vacuum and heating to ~ 375K for several hours. This adsorptive behavior is likely due to the 19 high abundances of oxyhydroxides and complex clay minerals in these chondrites. In addition, we attribute the high abundances of organics revealed by 3-µm spectra of CI chondrites (higher than all other chondrite types) to the mineralogy of CI chondrites (oxyhydroxides- and clay- rich). CM chondrites have a less intense 3-µm band than CI chondrites, suggesting they experienced less aqueous alteration. The 3-μm band of CM chondrites is centered ~2.80 µm, more likely due to the presence of Fe-serpentine (cronstedtite). The measured 3-μm spectra of CR chondrites revealed that the degree of aqueous alteration in these chondrites is moderate (moderate phyllosilicate abundances) relative to CI and CM chondrites. CV chondrites, except for Efremovka, have a very shallow 3-µm band, consistent with their lower phyllosilicate proportions and their experienced metamorphism environments. Like CV chondrites, CO chondrites have a very shallow 3-µm band that suggest they experienced minor aqueous alteration. The 3-µm band in CH/CBb is deep and broad centered ~ 3.11 µm, possibly due the high abundance of FeNi metal and presence of heavily hydrated clasts in these chondrites. The 3-µm spectra of Essebi (C2-ung) and EET 83226 are more consistent with CM chondrites' spectra. 3-µm spectra of Tagish lake (C2-ung), on the other hand, are consistent with CI chondrites. These spectra show substantial change between ambient and asteroid-like conditions due to the significant amount of adsorbed water. This spectral change in Tagish Lake is more likely associated with the presence of oxyhydroxides and clays. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by NASA Hayabusa2 Participating Scientist grant NNX17AL02G (PI: DT). Travel support for YN to JHU APL's LabSPEC was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Core-to-Core Program "International Network of Planetary Sciences". We thank Devin Schrader for preparing and providing the following samples: MIL 15328, DOM 10085, and EET 83226. We thank Mike Zolensky for preparing and providing the following samples: NWA 4964, SAU 290, and Tagish Lake. The authors would also thank and appreciate Neyda Abreu and Kieren Howard for the carbonaceous chondrite discussion. Other meteorite samples have been provided by the American Museum of Natural History & University of Winnipeg's Hyperspectral Optical Sensing for Extraterrestrial Reconnaissance Laboratory. US Antarctic meteorite samples are recovered by the Antarctic Search for Meteorites (ANSMET) program, which has been funded by NSF and NASA, and characterized and curated by the Department of Mineral Sciences of the Smithsonian Institution and Astromaterials Curation Office at NASA Johnson Space Center. 20 References Bartoschewitz R., Appel P., Mader B., Park J., Nagao K., Okazaki R., Kusakabe M., Krähenbühl U., and Prudencio M. I. 2005. Sayh Al Uhaymir 290-A new CH3 chondrite (abstract #5079). Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40: A18. Berlanga, G., Hibbitts, C.A., Takir, D., Dyar, M.D., Sklute, E. 2016. Spectral nature of CO2 adsorption onto meteorites. Icarus 280: 366-377. Brearley, A. and Martin, P. 1992. CI chondrite-like clasts in the Nilpena polymict ureilite -- Implications for aqueous alteration processes in CI chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56: 173-1386. Bland, P.A. et al., 2002. 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy studies of meteorites: Implications for weathering rates, meteorite flux, and early Solar System processes. Hyperfine Interact. 142, 481 -- 494. Bland, P.A., Cressey, G., Menzies, O.N., 2004. Modal mineralogy of carbonaceous chondrites by X-ray diffraction and Mössbauer spectroscopy. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 39, 3 -- 16. Bunch, T.E., Chang, S., 1980. Carbonaceous chondrites -- II. Carbonaceous chondrite phyllosilicates and light element geochemistry as indicators of parent body processes and surface conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 1543 -- 1578. Burns R. G. 1993. Origin of electronic spectra in minerals in the visible to near-infrared region. In Topics in remote sensing 4: Remote geochemical analysis: Elemental and mineralogical composition, edited by Pieters C. M. and Englert P. A. J. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3 -- 29. Burns, R.G., Fisher, D.S., 1994. Nanophase mixed-valence iron minerals in meteorites identified by cryogenic Mössbauer spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interact. 91, 571 -- 576. Buseck, P.R., Hua, X., 1993. Matrices of carbonaceous chondrite meteorites. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 21, 255 -- 305. Cloutis E. A., Gaffey M. J., Jackowski T. L., and Reed K. L. 1986. Calibrations of phase abundance, composition, and particle size distribution for olivine-orthopyroxene mixtures from reflectance spectra. Journal of Geophysical Research 91:11,641 -- 11,653. Cloutis E.A., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J., Alexander C.M.O'D. and Mann P. 2011a. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 1. CI chondrites. Icarus 212, 180- 209. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J. and Mann P. 2011b. Spectral reflectance 21 properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 2. CM chondrites. Icarus 216, 309-346. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T. and Gaffey M.J. 2012a. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 3. CR chondrites. Icarus 217, 389-407. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T. and Gaffey M.J. 2012b. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites 4: Aqueously altered and thermally metamorphosed meteorites. Icarus 220, 586-617. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J. and Mann P. 2012c. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 5. CO chondrites. Icarus 220, 466-486. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J., Mann P. and Bell III J.F. 2012d. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 6. CV chondrites. Icarus 221, 328- 358. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T. and Gaffey M.J. 2012e. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 7. CK chondrites. Icarus 221, 911-924. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J. and Mann P. 2012f. Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites: 8. "Other" carbonaceous chondrites: CH, ungrouped, polymict, xenolithic inclusions, and R chondrites. Icarus 221, 984-1001. Delbo, M., and Patrick M. 2011. "Temperature History and Dynamical Evolution of (101955) 1999 RQ 36: A Potential Target for Sample Return from a Primitive Asteroid." Astrophysical Journal Letters 728 (2 PART II): 1 -- 5. doi:10.1088/2041- 8205/728/2/L42. Endress M. and Bischoff A. (1996) Carbonates in CI chondrites: clues to parent body evolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 489 -- 507. Milliken, R.E., Mustard, J.F. (2007) Estimating the water content of hydrated minerals using reflectance spectroscopy: I. Effects of darkening agents and low-albedo materials. Icarus 189, issue , pages 50-573. Pearson, V.K., Sephton, M.A., Kearsley, A.T., Bland, P.A., Franchi, I.A., Gilmour, I., 2002. Clay mineral -- organic matter relationships in the early solar system. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 1829 -- 1833. Krot A. N., Keil K., Goodrich C.A., and Scott E. R. D. 2003. Classification of meteorites. 83 -- 128. In Meteorites, comets, and planets, edited by Davis A. M. Treatise on Geochemistry, vol. 1. Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford. Gaffey, M.J., 1974. A Systematic Study of the Spectral Reflectivity Characteristics of the 22 Meteorite Classes with Applications to the Interpretation of Asteroid Spectra for Mineralogical and Petrological Information. PhD Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 355pp. Lauretta et al. 20189. The unexpected surface of asteroid (101955) Bennu. Nature, volume 568, pages55 -- 60 (2019). McSween Jr., H.Y., 1977. Petrographic variations among carbonaceous chondrites of the Vigarano type. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 1777 -- 1790. McSween Jr., H.Y., 1977b. Carbonaceous chondrites of the Ornans type: A metamorphic sequence. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 477 -- 491. McSween Jr., H.Y., 1979. Are carbonaceous chondrites primitive or processed? A review. Rev.Geophys. Space Phys. 17, 1059 -- 1078. Miyamoto M. and Zolensky M. E. 1994. Infrared diffuse reflectance spectra of carbonaceous chondrites: Amount of hydrous minerals. Meteoritics 29:849 -- 853. Murty S. V. S., Mahajan R. R., and Bartoschewitz R. 2007. Nitrogen in Sayh al Uhaymir 290. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42: A113 -- A113. Izawa, M.R.M., Flemming, R.L., King, P.L., Peterson, R.C., McCausland, P.J.A., 2010. Mineralogical and spectroscopic investigation of the Tagish Lake carbonaceous chondrite by X-ray diffraction and infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 45, 675 -- 698. Ivanova, M.A. , et al. ,2008. The Isheyevo meteorite: mineralogy, petrology, bulk chemistry, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon isotopic compositions, and Ar-40-Ar-39 ages. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 915 -- 940 . Johnson, T.V., Fanale, F.P., 1973. Optical properties of carbonaceous chondrites and their relationship to asteroids. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 8507 -- 8518 Howard, K.T. et al. 2011. Modal mineralogy of CM chondrites by X-ray diffraction (PSD- XRD): Part 2. Degree, nature and setting of aqueous alteration. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2735 -- 2751. Howard, K.T. et al. 2015. Classification of hydrous meteorites (CR, CM and C2 ungrouped) by phyllosilicate fraction: PSD-XRD modal mineralogy and planetesimal environments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Act, 149: 206-222. Salisbury, J.W., Hunt, G.R., Lenhoff, C.J., 1975. Visible and near-infrared spectra: X. Stony meteorites. Mod. Geol. 5, 115 -- 126. Sato, K. et al. 1997. Absorption bands near three micrometers in diffuse reflectance spectra of carbonaceous chondrites: Comparison with asteroids. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 23 32, 503 -- 507. Takir D. and Emery J. P. 2012. Outer Main Belt asteroids: Identification and distribution of four 3-µm spectral groups. Icarus 219:641 -- 654. Takir, D. et al., 2013. Nature and degree of aqueous alteration in CM and CI carbonaceous chondrites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, 1618 -- 1637. Takir, D et al. 2015. Toward an understanding of phyllosilicate mineralogy in the outer main asteroid belt. Icarus 257, 185-193. Tsuda, Y., Yoshikawa, Makoto, Abe, M., Minamino, H. 2015. System design of the Hayabusa2-Asteroid sample return mission to 1999 JU3 Acta Astronautica 91, 356- 362. Tonui, E., Zolensky, M., Hiroi, T., Nakamura, T., Lipschutz, M.E., Wang, M., Okudaira, K. Petrographic, chemical and spectroscopic evidence for thermal metamorphism in carbonaceous chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 126 (2014) 284-306. I: CI and CM chondrites Van Schmus W. R., and Wood J. A. 1967. A chemical petrologic classification for the chondritic meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 31:747-765. Watanable et al. 2019. Hayabusa2 arrives at the carbonaceous asteroid 162173 Ryugu-A spinning top -- shaped rubble pile. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8032. Weisberg, M.K., Prinz, M., Clayton, R.N., Mayeda, T.K., 1993. The CR (Renazzo-type) carbonaceous chondrite group and its implications. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 1567 -- 1586. Zolensky, M.E. et al., 2002. Mineralogy of Tagish Lake: An ungrouped type 2 carbonaceous chondrite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 737 -- 761. 24
1607.02322	1	1607	2016-07-08T11:40:16	Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Among the candidates for generating turbulence in accretion discs in situations with low intrinsic ionization the vertical shear instability (VSI) has become an interesting candidate, as it relies purely on a vertical gradient in the angular velocity. Existing simulations have shown that $\alpha$-values a few times $10^{-4}$ can be generated. The particle growth in the early planet formation phase is determined by the dynamics of dust particles. Here, we address in particular the efficiency of VSI-turbulence in concentrating particles in order to generate overdensities and low collision velocities. We perform 3D numerical hydrodynamical simulations of accretion discs around young stars that include radiative transport and irradiation from the central star. The motion of particles within a size range of a fraction of mm up to several m is followed using standard drag formula. We confirm that under realistic conditions the VSI is able to generate turbulence in full 3D protoplanetary discs. The irradiated disc shows turbulence within 10 to 60au. The mean radial motion of the gas is such that it is directed inward near the midplane and outward in the surface layers. We find that large particles drift inward with the expected speed, while small particles can experience phases of outward drift. Additionally, the particles show bunching behaviour with overdensities reaching 5 times the average value, which is strongest for dimensionless stopping times around unity. Particles in a VSI-turbulent discs are concentrated in large scale turbulent eddies and show low relative speeds that allow for growing collisions. The reached overdensities will also allow for the onset streaming instabilities further enhancing particle growth. The outward drift for small particles at higher disk elevations allows for the transport of processed high temperature material in the Solar System to larger distances.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. vsi-paper September 29, 2018 c(cid:13)ESO 2018 6 1 0 2 l u J 8 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 2 2 3 2 0 . 7 0 6 1 : v i X r a Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley Institut für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany e-mail: [email protected],[email protected] ABSTRACT Context. Among the candidates for generating turbulence in accretion discs in situations with low intrinsic ionization the vertical shear instability (VSI) has become an interesting candidate, as it relies purely on a vertical gradient in the angular velocity. Existing numerical simulations have shown that α-values a few times 10−4 can be generated. Aims. The particle growth in the early planet formation phase is determined by the dynamics of embedded dust particles. Here, we address in particular the efficiency of VSI-turbulence in concentrating particles in order to generate overdensities and low collision velocities. Methods. We perform three-dimensional (3D) numerical hydrodynamical simulations of accretion discs around young stars that include radiative transport and irradiation from the central star. The motion of embedded particles within a size range of a fraction of mm up to several m is followed using standard drag formula. Results. We confirm that under realistic conditions the VSI is able to generate turbulence in full 3D protoplanetary discs. The irradiated disc shows turbulence within 10 to 60 au. The mean radial motion of the gas is such that it is directed inward near the midplane and outward in the surface layers. We find that large particles drift inward with the expected speed, while small particles can experience phases of outward drift. Additionally, the particles show bunching behaviour with overdensities reaching 5 times the average value, which is strongest for dimensionless stopping times around unity. Conclusions. Particles in a VSI-turbulent discs are concentrated in large scale turbulent eddies and show low relative speeds that allow for growing collisions. The reached overdensities will also allow for the onset streaming instabilities further enhancing particle growth. The outward drift for small particles at higher disk elevations allows for the transport of processed high temperature material in the Solar System to larger distances. Key words. instability -- hydrodynamics -- accretion discs -- radiative transfer 1. Introduction To drive mass flow in accretion discs an anomalous source of an- gular momentum is required (Frank et al. 2002). A strong candi- date is the magneto-rotational instability (MRI), which gives rise to turbulent magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) flows that create an outward angular momentum transport discs (Balbus & Haw- ley 1998). Driven by magnetic fields, the MRI requires a suf- ficient level of ionization to sustain a turbulent state within the disc. However, protoplanetary discs have only a very low tem- perature regime and insufficient thermal ionization. Even con- sidering external sources of ionization there appears to be a re- gion of insufficient ionization level such that the MRI cannot operate, as shown by resistive MHD simulations including radia- tive transport (Flaig et al. 2012). Hence, there may exist a dead zone somewhere between 2 − 20 au (Armitage 2011), where the MRI can only produce very weak turbulence. Recent simulations which included, in addition to Ohmic resistivity, also ambipolar diffusion have even shown no signs of turbulence at all in this region (Gressel et al. 2015). The Hall effect creates strong winds in the surface of the disc and may even reintroduce angular mo- mentum transport in the dead zone, but this depends on the sign of the magnetic field (Bai 2014, 2015). Thus another origin of instability inside the dead zones is warranted to drive accretion in protoplanetary discs. As an alternative to the MRI, different examples of purely hydrodynamic instabilities in discs have been suggested, such as the gravitational instability (Lin & Pringle 1987), the convective instability (Ruden et al. 1988), or the baroclinic instability (Klahr & Bodenheimer 2003), but they do not operate under general conditions. One possibility, that has attracted recently more at- tention is the vertical shear instability (VSI) suggested for accre- tion discs by Urpin (2003). The mechanism was first examined in relation to differential rotating stars (Goldreich & Schubert 1967; Fricke 1968), and it is also known as Goldreich-Schubert- Fricke instability. In the context of discs first simulations have been carried out by Arlt & Urpin (2004). While there is a much larger radial gradient in the angular velocity, Ω, to feed insta- bilities, most instabilities cannot overcome the stabilising effect of rotation. In the context of the VSI, it is the vertical shear in Ω created by a radial temperature gradient that allows the disc to become unstable. The numerical work of Nelson et al. (2013) showed that a small turbulent α-value in the range of a few 10−4 was possible for isothermal discs. For non-isothermal discs Nel- son et al. (2013) point out that radiative cooling (diffusion) and viscosity will reduce the instability, and they developed a the- oretical model describing the initial vertical elongated modes destabilising the disc. In simulations that included full radiative transport Stoll & Kley (2014) showed that for situations typical in protoplanetary discs a sustained VSI was possible providing Article number, page 1 of 17 A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper an α ∼ 10−4. They found the development of a global wave pat- tern within the disc whose wavelength was determined partly by viscous effects. Later, Barker & Latter (2015) analyzed the VSI through linear analyses of locally isothermal discs and support the modal behaviour seen in the non-linear simulations by Nel- son et al. (2013) and Stoll & Kley (2014). They also stress the importance of viscosity to set the smallest length scale. Recently, Lin & Youdin (2015) shed light on the cooling re- quirements of the VSI, that arise because the VSI has to compete with the stabilising vertical buoyancy. Their theoretical models predict activity in regions with large cooling time only for very large wavenumbers. Thus the VSI is limited by the cooling time on large scales and by viscosity on small scales. With this in mind they predict VSI activity for typical disc models only be- tween 5 and 100 au. We test this idea by expanding our previous work (Stoll & Kley 2014) where we used a self-consistent radiation transport module and a vertically irradiated disc in the simulations. Here, we treat the irradiation in a more realistic way as originating from the central star, and show that even under this condition the VSI can be sustained. The turbulence in protoplanetary discs is also critical for the initial dust evolution that leads eventually to planet forma- tion. Numerical simulations performed by Johansen & Klahr (2005) and Fromang & Nelson (2005) showed that particles can be caught in the local pressure maxima generated by the MRI turbulence. This clustering of dust particles can then trigger a streaming instability (Youdin & Goodman 2005) that will lead to further clustering and subsequently to the formation of km- planetesimals. In the context of the VSI the large scale velocity patterns of the corrugation mode promises interesting behaviour for embedded dust grains and larger particles. To investigate the impact of the VSI modes on the dust particles we add particles into our disc model and follow their dynamical evolution. The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we present our numerical and physical setup. We present a detailed analysis of an isothermal disc model in Sect. 3, and we discuss in Sect. 4 the results for the particle evolution is this model. In Sect. 5 we describe the results of a viscous model. The simulations with radiation transport and stellar irradiation are presented in Sect. 6 and in Sect. 7 we conclude. 2. The model setup We use the same equations and physical disc setup, as described in detail in our first paper (Stoll & Kley 2014) and give here only a very brief outline. In summary, for the integration of the hydro- dynamical equations we use PLUTO a publicly available code, based on a Godunov scheme for viscous hydrodynamical flow (Mignone et al. 2007), extended by flux-limited diffusion mod- ule for radiation transport and a ray-tracing method for stellar irradiation (Kolb et al. 2013). Having used a two-dimensional, axisymmetric disc setup in our previous work, we now extend the computational domain in the azimuthal direction to three di- mensions (3D) and add particles to the flow. For this purpose we added a particle solver based on the method by Bai & Stone (2010), that we describe in the next section. 2.1. Particle Solver We use Lagrangian particles with drag and gravitation: dvp dt Article number, page 2 of 17 vp − u ts = a = f + , (1) where f is an acceleration due to an external force, here the grav- itation of the star. vp and u are the particle and gas velocity and ts is the stopping time. We treat all particles as if they were in the Epstein regime where the mean free path of the gas molecules is typically larger than the particle cross section (Epstein 1924). The stopping time is then ts = rpρp √ 8/πcs , ρg (2) where rp is particle radius, ρp the particle bulk density, ρg the gas density, and cs is the sound speed. In addition we will use τs = tsΩK for the dimensionless stopping time. To solve the equation of motion of the particles (1) we follow Bai & Stone (2010). If the stopping time is larger than the time step, ∆t, of the simulation, we solve the semi-implicit equations x(cid:48) = x(n) + (cid:104) v(n) p , (v(n) p ∆t 2 + ∆ta ∆t 2 )/2, x(cid:48)(cid:105) , , p v(n+1) p + v(n+1) = v(n) v(n+1) p p x(n+1) = x(cid:48) + where n denotes the timestep level, and x(cid:48) an intermediate posi- tion of the particle. The particle acceleration, a, is a function of the particle velocities, vp, see Eq. (1). For stopping times smaller than the time step we solve the following implicit equation, where the velocity update does not depend on the old velocity. x(cid:48) = x(n) + ∆tv(n) v(n+1) p = v(n) p + x(n+1) = x(n) + ∆t 2 ∆t 2 p (a[v(n+1) p (v(n) p + v(n+1) p ) , x(cid:48)] + a[v(n+1) p − ∆ta(v(n+1) p , x(cid:48)), x(n)]) This allows the drag force to damp the particle velocity without unphysical oscillations. The test simulations to verify the cor- rect implementation of the particle solver are described in the appendix in Sect. A. 2.2. Physical setup In order to study the importance of radiative effects we decided to perform first a sequence of isothermal simulations. We de- scribe briefly the setup of our fiducial disc model, which consists of a 3D isothermal model that simulates one eighth (covering 45◦ in azimuth) of the disc at a resolution of 1024×256×64 (in r, θ, φ) without viscosity. The full radiative model will be described in section 6. We use the same general disc setup as in Stoll & Kley (2014), where we started with a disc in force equilibrium, (cid:34)GM (cid:32) c2 s 1√ R2 + Z2 − 1 R (cid:33)(cid:35) with a temperature that is constant on cylinders (cid:33)p (cid:33)q R0 ρ(R, Z) = ρ0 (cid:32) R (cid:32) R Here, cs = (cid:112) T(R, Z) = T0 R0 exp . , (3) (4) p/ρ denotes the isothermal sound speed, and H = Rh = cs/ΩK is the local pressure scale height of the accretion disc. We use (R,Z,φ) for cylindrical coordinates and (r,θ,φ) for Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Fig. 1. The velocity in the meridional direction, uθ, in units of the Kepler velocity for the fiducial isothermal run without viscosity and a resolu- tion of 1024 × 256 × 64. Displayed is the quasi-stationary state after 1200 years. the spherical coordinates that we use in our simulations. Typical values for the density and temperature exponents are p = −1.5 and q = −1. The computational domain of the fiducial model is limited to r = 2 − 10 au in the radial and ±5 scale heights in the merid- ional direction. In contrast to Stoll & Kley (2014), where we only simulated 2D, axisymmetric discs, we use here in the azimuthal direction one eighth of the full disc (φmax = π/4) to capture the complete 3D physics of the turbulent disc. 3. The turbulent isothermal disc Before embedding the particles we first describe the turbulent properties of the VSI for several disc models. We start with the fiducial isothermal and inviscid model for one eighth of the disc and compare this below to models with viscosity and a larger azimuthal domain. In the subsequent section we use the fiducial model for the simulations with particles. Finally, in the last sec- tion we will also show the results of a radiative, irradiated disc model. ρurδuφ As shown in previous numerical simulations of the VSI the turbulent state is characterized by vertically elongated flow structures as shown in Fig. 1 for the meridional velocity, for more details see Nelson et al. (2013) and Stoll & Kley (2014). To characterize the turbulence of the disc we measure the Reynolds stress that we define here as Tr,φ = where δuφ(r, θ, φ) = uφ(r, θ, φ) −(cid:68) (cid:69) (cid:69) t is the deviation of the angular velocity from the (time averaged) mean azimuthal velocity. We denote averages taken over certain variables by (cid:104)(cid:105) with the appropriate indices. In this definition, Tr,φ is a 2D array in r, θ. The time average, t, needed in Eq. (5) is in general not known in advance but one can rewrite the Reynolds stress as (cid:68) (cid:68) uφ(r, θ, φ) (cid:69) (cid:68) (cid:68) (cid:69) (cid:69) (5) uφ , φ,t , (6) − (cid:104)ρur(cid:105)φ,t φ,t uφ φ,t Tr,φ = ρuruφ where the right hand side can in principle be calculated "on the fly" during the simulation. For convenience, we chose to store φ- averaged 2D data sets at regular time intervals, and then average these over time to obtain Tr,φ(r, θ). Fig. 2. The averaged azimuthal velocity compared to the analytical ve- locity (upper panel) and α(z) (lower panel). For the green (analytical) curve Eq. (9) has been used for the mean value of uφ. The blue curve shows the average from 1000 to 1800 years over 800 time levels and radially from 4.5au to 5.5au. From these we calculate the dimensionless α-parameter as a function of radius , α(r) = (7) where P = (cid:104)p(cid:105)φ,t is the azimuthal and time averaged pressure. For the vertically dependent α(z)-parameter at a certain radius rc, (cid:68) θ (cid:69) Tr,φ (cid:104)P(cid:105)θ (cid:68) (cid:69) Tr,φ (cid:104)P(cid:105)r r αrc(z) = , (8) we integrate only over a small radial domain around the desired radius, rc. This averaging procedure to calculate α has to be used for general discs, for example the radiative discs below. However, for the isothermal simulations, one can approxi- mate the time averaged t in the calculation of the Reynolds stress, by the analytically calculated solution for the equilibrium angular velocity (Nelson et al. 2013), that can be obtained from the initial equilibrium disc setup (cid:68) (cid:69) uφ (cid:35) 1 2 + (1 + q) − qR√ R2 + Z2 , (9) (cid:18) H (cid:19)2 R (p + q) (cid:34) where ΩK = (cid:112) Ω(R, Z) = ΩK GM(cid:12)/R3 is the Keplerian angular velocity. In Fig. 2 (upper panel) we can see that this is indeed a valid ap- proximation. Aside from reducing noise in α, since it no longer depends on the time averaged velocity, this has the further ad- vantage of allowing us to directly calculate the α-parameter at each timestep and we thus only need to store 1D arrays, which we then can later average over arbitrary timespans. In Fig. 3 we compare the radial α-parameter for differ- ent isothermal simulations. The averaging was done from 1000 years to 1800 years with 800 snapshots taken at regular intervals. Shown are cases with different resolutions, where the labels in- dicate the radial number of grid cells, and also viscous models. The dimensionless viscosity is given in units of (uK,1 au · 1 au), where uK,1 au is the Kepler velocity at 1 au. We can see that in contrast to the 2D simulations in Stoll & Kley (2014), where the α-parameter differed by more than 50% when we doubled the resolution, these 3D simulations show no clear dependence on resolution, with all curves being within 10% of each other at Article number, page 3 of 17 −8−7−6−5−4−3−2−1azimuthalvelocityinuK,1au×10−3averagedanalytical−4−2024zinscaleheights012345Reynoldsstress/hPi×10−4A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper findings are in agreement with results of isothermal MHD simu- lations of global turbulent accretion discs without a net magnetic vertical flux that also show gas inflow near the disc midplane and outflow in the disc's surface layers (Flock et al. 2011). Within the framework of viscous discs the vertical variation of α (shown in the lower panel of Fig. 2) will play a role in determining the ur(z)-profile, see also Kley & Lin (1992) and Takeuchi & Lin (2002), who studied the the ur(z)-profile for constant α. 3.1. 3D-simulation: full disc In this subsection we present a full disc, meaning an azimuthal domain from 0 to 2π in contrast to the 0 to π/4 of our fidu- cial model, in order to check the validity of our results obtained from calculations with the reduce domain. Since this full simu- lation is computationally expensive, we used a lower resolution of 512 × 128 × 512. The full simulation is compared to the one eighth simulation of the disc with a resolution of 512× 128× 64, which has the same azimuthal extent as the fiducial model, but not the resolution. We added a small dimensionless physical vis- cosity, ν = 10−7, to be independent of the unknown numeri- cal viscosity, allowing better comparison with other simulations. To give an impression of possible differences in the flow struc- tures between the full and fiducial model we display in Fig. 5, from top to bottom, the fluctuations of the density, and the radial and vertical velocity components in the midplane of the disc, where the top inset in each panel refers to the fiducial model with φmax = π/4 and the bottom part to the full disc. The two top panels for the density and radial velocity clearly show non- axisymmetric, wave-like features in the disc. The bottom panel seems to indicate a more axisymmetric structure which is a re- sult of the VSI eigenmode dominating the vertical motion in the disc, as seen above in Fig. 1. To analyze the turbulent structure in more detail we calcu- lated azimuthal power spectra of the radial and vertical kinetic energy fluctuations in the disc midplane for two different times, spatially averaged from 3 to 7 au. We can see in Fig. 6 that dur- ing the initial growth phase (top panel) the instability is driven at two length scales. The smaller one, at azimuthal wave num- bers m ≈ 200, is most likely due to the initial noise as given by the finite discretization which is enhanced by the growth phase of the instability. The larger one (at m ≈ 10) is on the scale of the wavelength of the strongest growing VSI mode. This feature is also visible in the azimuthal direction even though the VSI should be axisymmetric. We speculate that this is due to a distur- bance created in the radial direction by a Kelvin-Helmholtz in- stability that is sheared into the azimuthal direction. We can also see that in the quasi stationary phase (bottom panel) the turbu- lence decays faster than Kolmogorov turbulence for wavenum- bers around m ≈ 20, which is the scale at which the VSI is driven. There the energy is concentrated in the VSI modes and not in the turbulent kinetic energy and thus the model of Kol- mogorov decay is not applicable (Dubrulle 1992). Only at small scales the vertical kinetic energy fluctuations decay with a Kol- mogorov spectrum. This can be seen in both simulations. From this we infer that the local properties of the turbulence generated by the VSI are very similar for the restricted and full azimuthal domain and is already fully captured by the smaller disc. To analyse the locality of the VSI further, we also compare the two point correlation functions for the two disc models. This is defined as ξ f (∆r, ∆φ) = (cid:104) f (r, φ) f (r + ∆r(r), φ + ∆φ)(cid:105) , (10) Fig. 3. Comparison of the radial α(r) obtained for different isothermal simulations used in this paper. Values are averaged from 1000 to 1800 years. All simulations except 'full' are for one eighth of a complete disc. The specified resolution refers to the number of radial grid cells in the simulations, where 'res1024' denotes the resolution of our fiducial model and 'res512' has half the resolution in all spatial directions. In addition to the inviscid fiducial model we ran also simulation with non- zero viscosity, and the labels refer to the dimensionless value of the constant kinematic viscosity coefficient ν. Fig. 4. The radial velocity ur (in units of the Kepler velocity at 1 au) for the different isothermal simulations evaluated at 5 au. Shown are the same models as in the previous Fig. 3, averaged again from 1000 to 1800 years. Negative velocities correpond to inflow towards the star. 6 au. We ran a further, shorter simulation without viscosity and double resolution of 2048× 512× 128 and could not see a differ- ence in wavelength or Reynolds stress in the early equilibrium phase from 500 to 800 years. Additionally we see only a weak dependence on viscosity with noticeable differences beginning with the largest kinematic viscosity, which starts to suppress the VSI in the inner region. A further increase in viscosity would suppress the instability completely, as shown already in Nelson et al. (2013). Since we are interested in the particle drift we also show in Fig. 4 the radial velocity in the disc at 5 au as a function of height. We averaged from 1000 years to 1800 years, which is roughly the quasi-stationary phase. The radial velocity is in- wards in the midplane and outwards in the corona. There are only minor differences in height were the direction of the flow changes. Interestingly, this profile is opposite to that of a lami- nar viscous flow, where it is outwards in the midplane, and in- ward near the disc surfaces (Urpin 1984; Kley & Lin 1992). Our Article number, page 4 of 17 2345678910radiusinau−1012345678Reynoldsstress/<P>×10−4ν=0res512ν=0res1024ν=1·10−7res512ν=1·10−7res1024ν=1·10−7res512fullν=5·10−7res1024−0.4−0.20.00.20.4zinau−2−1012345radialvelocityinuK,1au×10−4ν=0res512ν=0res1024ν=1·10−7res512ν=1·10−7res1024ν=1·10−7res512fullν=5·10−7res1024Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Fig. 6. Power spectrum for the different kinetic energy components along the azimuthal direction in the disc midplane averaged over the radial direction. The black line shows the Kolmogorov spectrum decay- ing with u(m)2 ∝ m−5/3 where m denotes the azimuthal wave number. The top panel refers to the growth phase after 200 years and the lower panel to the quasi-stationary phase after 1700 years. rection are driven by a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability that feeds off the strongest VSI mode. From this we conclude that our re- duced domain captures all of the important physics even though it enforces stronger correlations.1 The models for different levels of background viscosity were shown already in Fig. 3. The full model has a slightly smaller α, but is apart from this very similar. We also compared the results from the particle motions (not shown), but also found only mi- nor differences. Hence, we conclude that we can use the reduced model with φmax = π/4 to analyze the motion of embedded par- ticles. 4. Isothermal discs with dust The particles are added into the fiducial model after 200 years when the VSI is reaching the quasi-stationary phase at the inner part of the disc. After further 800 years both VSI and particles are then in quasi-equilibrium. The particles are inserted in the midplane, randomly distributed over the radius and azimuthal angle, with the velocity of the gas at their current position. If a particle leaves the domain in the inner edge we insert it again randomly positioned over 1 au at the outer edge. This ensures that a clump of particles that leaves the domain is sufficiently smoothed out when added again. We add 10,000 particles per size with 20 different sizes, beginning with 1µm up to 3000m. 1 A simulation with a quarter disc still shows the same enhanced cor- relations Article number, page 5 of 17 Fig. 5. The fluctuations of density, the radial and vertical velocity (from top to bottom) in the midplane of the disc with 3 to 7 au after 1700 years. The top part in each panel refers to the fiducial model with one eighth of the full azimuthal domain while the full model is shown in the lower part of each panel. where f is the quantity to be correlated, which has a zero mean, < f >= 0. We evaluate the correlation in the disc midplane and take the radial domain from 3 to 7 au, which we treat for this calculation as periodic. The correlations are evaluated on a loga- rithmic grid, to better capture the properties under investigation. In Fig. 7 we present the results of the two point correlations for the density fluctuations and the radial and meridional veloc- ity after 1700 years. The fluctuations are clearly non-isotropic and correlated not only on a local scale but also weakly over the whole domain. We can see again that the smaller domain is a rea- sonable approximation to the larger domain, even though the cor- relations are enhanced in the smaller domain, but for the vertical velocity we have a global correlation for both cases. This again strengthens the impression that the fluctuations in azimuthal di- 100101102103m10−1210−1110−1010−910−810−710−6(cid:10)FFT(u2)(cid:11)ru2r2π-discu2rπ/4-discu2θ2π-discu2θπ/4-discm−5/3100101102103m10−810−710−610−510−410−3(cid:10)FFT(u2)(cid:11)ru2r2π-discu2rπ/4-discu2θ2π-discu2θπ/4-discm−5/3A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper Fig. 8. The mean radial drift velocity of the dust particles depending on the radius of the particles at r = 5 au. This is compared to expected drift velocity for pressure supported discs as given by Eq. (11). Shown are isothermal disc simulation with resolution 1024 × 256 × 64 from 1000 to 2000 years. Different colors and symbols are used for inward and outward drift. We estimate the error from the radial diffusion coefficent. the particles or the stopping time. For the models in this section the correspondence between these can be read off from Table 1. 4.1. Radial particle drift The radial drift velocity for the dust in the midplane in the Ep- stein regime is given by (Nakagawa et al. 1986) udrift = ∂ ln p ∂ ln R (H/R)2uK τs + τ−1 s . (11) This is due to the drag force resulting from the difference be- tween the Kepler velocity of the particles and the gas velocity, which is modified by the pressure support p. We use the mid- plane pressure for our theoretical curves, since most particles are in the midplane, at least the larger ones. Here τs is the di- mensionless stopping time (see Eq. (2)) and uK is the Kepler velocity. We start by comparing the radial drift of the dust particles in our simulation with this theoretical prediction for the drift ve- locity in Fig. 8. The results from the simulation are extracted by fitting a linear function to the mean radial position of the parti- cles starting with a distance to the star of 5 ± 0.5 au. We fit over the span of 1000 years beginning with 800 years after inserting the particles or over the time the particles need to travel 0.5 au, whichever is smaller. The inwardly directed drift is plotted in green (dots), and outward drift in blue (squares). Since the er- ror in the measurement of the velocity stems from the random walk of the particles due to the turbulence, we estimate the er- ror from the radial diffusion coefficent (see Fig. 12). The error is then given by the half-width of the distribution divided by the square-root of the number of involved particles. We can see that the speed of large particles is similar to the predictions. A difference in speed of approximately 20% can be seen for the smaller particles in a size range between 0.1 cm to 10 cm. This deviation can be partly attributed to the spread of the particles in the vertical direction, because particles not in the midplane have a larger stopping time (lower gas density), and the prediction is calculated using the stopping time of particles in the midplane. An additional factor is that they can be caught temporarily in small scale vortices (Johansen & Klahr 2005). Fig. 7. The two point correlation of the density, the radial and vertical velocity (from top to bottom) in the midplane of the disc with 3 to 7 au after 1700 years. The top part in each panel refers to the fiducial model with one eighth of the full azimuthal domain while the full model is shown in the lower part of each panel. The Epstein regime is strictly valid only up to sizes of 10m, and particles larger than that are added as a numerical experiment. Note, that for the isothermal discs the scale for the density is not fixed and thus the particle size regime may be different for different choices of the disc density. This is not the case for the disc with radiation transport as shown in the next section, where the chosen disc mass (the density) fixes the disc temperature, and hence the disc scale height, through specific values of the opacity. We begin with the results for the radial drift and diffusion of the dust particles, then we discuss the vertical diffusion and finally the relative velocity distribution for colliding particles. We will dicuss our results either in terms of the physical size of Article number, page 6 of 17 10−410−310−210−1100101102103104105particleradiusincm10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−2driftvelocityinau/yearinwarddrifttheoryoutwarddriftinwarddriftMoritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Fig. 9. Histogram of particles with size of 31cm, after 1500 years (green line) and at the start (blue line, Poisson distributed). We divide the dis- tance from the star from 2 to 10 au into 800 bins and count the number of particles in each bin. The average number of particles per bin is 12.5. Fig. 11. Probability to find a certain number of particles in a radial bin with ∆r = 0.01 au in the region from 3 to 9 au, for different stopping times (refer to Fig. 9). The average number of particles per bin is 12.5. We averaged over 50 snapshots, each 10 years apart, beginning with year 1500. The drift velocity for the smallest particles can even be pos- itive for some time intervals. This is shown for particles at 5 au in Fig. 8. At distances closer to the star they clearly drift inwards even though the gas momentum is the same (not shown). We will return to the analysis for those particles later in section 5.1, where the sign of the migration direction is better constraint. An interesting behavior of the particles is shown in the his- togram in Fig. 9. For this plot we divide the distance from the star from 2 to 10 au into 800 equal sized bins and count the number of particles per bin. We can clearly see that 1500 years after we inserted the particles, the distribution clearly deviates from the initial Poisson distribution and instead they clump together. This happens only for particles with a dimensionless stopping time of the order of unity. To further illustrate this feature, we show the number of par- ticles per radial bin over time for different particles sizes in Fig. 10. Note that the color scale is logarithmic. For this image and the following analysis we correct the particle density per 1 au to remain constant, as it was at the beginning of the simulations, by weighting the number of particles per bin by the number of par- ticles per 1 au. Since the particles move faster in the inner region and the particles that leave the inner region are added in the outer region, we would produce overdensities otherwise. This does not change the bunching statistics, however. After we insert the particles, the VSI is only active in the inner region, but is quickly spreading out to the whole disc, until after 1000 years the whole domain is active. One can see that the onset of the VSI leads to bunching of the particles. Due to the bunching we can clearly see the different drift velocities of the particles. But we can also see that at certain radii the particles are sometimes caught in the pressure fluctuations for a short time before moving on, which leads to the visible lines in the image. To make the dynamics involved clearer, we calculate another statistic property. This time we count how often a certain number of particles in a radial bin occurs. We average over 50 snapshots, each 10 years apart, beginning 1300 years after we inserted the particles. We then normalise by the total number of particles to find the probability for certain number of particles in a radial bin with width ∆r = 0.01. This is shown in Fig. 11. We can see that for the limit of small stopping time we still follow the initial Poisson distribution, which has its peak at 12.5 particles per bin (the average number) and decays with ∝ exp(−n2). These particles are tightly coupled to the gas and (cid:68) (cid:69) (cid:68) (cid:68) (cid:69) (cid:0)1 + τ2 δu2 φ s (cid:1)2 (cid:69) . can not be caught in pressure fluctuations. In contrast, parti- cles with (dimensionless) stopping time near unity decay with ∝ exp(−n). This increases the likelihood to find bins with a large number of particles which can easily lead to overdensities in dust by a factor of around 10. This is caused by short lived pressure fluctuations originating from the VSI, which briefly slow down the crossing particles. The largest particles again revert to the Poisson statistics, since they are not coupled to the gas. 4.2. Radial diffusion of particles Next we compare the radial diffusion of the embedded parti- cles with theoretical predictions. Since the power spectra of ur, δuφ, uθ are similar, the radial diffusion coefficient for parti- cles (Youdin & Lithwick 2007) is given by u2 r + 4τ2 s + 4τs urδuφ (cid:69) (cid:68) (cid:69) (cid:68) (cid:69) (12) Dd,r = teddy = 2 · 10−6 · u2 (cid:68) u2 For the simulation used for Fig. 12 we measure r (cid:54) 10−8 · u2 δu2 K,1au near φ the midplane, indicating isotropic turbulence. With these values and Eq. (11) for the radial drift we can use the radial diffusion to measure teddy. Surprisingly, from this we calculate a small di- mensionless, τeddy = teddyΩK of 0.1, compared with the large scale oscillations of the VSI on a timescale of 5 orbits per oscil- lation. K,1au and urδuφ r,φ,t = r,φ,t r,φ,t In Fig. 12 we show the radial distribution of particles with different sizes from which we extracted the radial drift and dif- fusion during a timespan of 100 years for different particle sizes, again for particles starting at 5 ± 0.5 au. While the smallest par- ticles (blue and green curves) follow directly the prediction, the particles with τs = 0.19 (red curve) seem to lag behind the the- oretical curve. As described below this difference is caused by the fact that the particles are more spread out vertically. Even larger particles (yellow) again show bunching behavior and are collected in two distinct peaks, due to being caught in different VSI waves. From this we can also calculate the radial Schmidt number, which Youdin & Lithwick (2007) determine for homogeneous Article number, page 7 of 17 2345678910radiusinau020406080100numberofparticlesstart1500orbits020406080100numberofparticlesinbin10−410−310−210−1100probabilityτs=1.9·10−6τs=1.9·10−2τs=1.9·10−1τs=6.1·10−1τs=1.9·100poissonA&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper Fig. 10. Histogram. Visualisation of the radial drift of the particles. We show the logarithm with base 10 of the number of particles per bin. One can see the clumping behaviour as the VSI growths, but also the velocity of the particles. For smaller particles we find good agreement with Eq. (13) but for τs of unity and larger, we measure Schmidt numbers smaller as predicted by Eq. (13) by a factor up to three at a stop- ping time of τs = 200. This is just noticable in Fig. 12 for the stopping time of τs = 1.9. There we can see that the predicted diffusion fits a single peak well, but not the whole curve, which is 50% wider. This can be explained by particles crossing large scale VSI modes which are not expected by the theoretical model of homogeneous isotropic turbulence used to calculate the pre- dictions for the Schmidt number. 4.3. Vertical diffusion of particles After the radial diffusion shows a small eddy life time, we are now interested in the vertical diffusion. In Fig. 13 we selected particles between 4.5 and 5.5 au and calculated a histogram of the vertical position to show the vertical distribution of different sized dust particles. For better statistics we added up the 50 last snapshots, spanning from 1200 years to 1700 years. While the small particles with stopping time smaller than unity show the expected Gaussian distribution with a scale height equal to the gas scale height, the particles with stopping time around unity clearly deviate from this. This can be explained by the large scale velocity pattern of the gas with active vertical shear as displayed in Fig. 1. The corrugation mode of the gas will move the par- ticles upward away from the disc's midplane, up to the point Fig. 12. Radial particle diffusion over 100 years, after 1000 years. The black dashed lines are calculated from theory for the different stopping times and with τeddy = 0.1 and < u2 K,1au, see Eq. (12). g,r >= 2 · 10−6 · u2 (cid:69) (cid:68) (cid:68) (cid:69) isotropic turbulence in the xy-plane with u2 r = δu2 φ , to be (cid:16) (cid:17)2 Scr = Dg,r Dp,r = 1 + τ2 s 1 + 4τ2 s , (13) where for the gas diffusion coefficient, Dg,r, we use in our case the dust diffusion of the smallest particles. Article number, page 8 of 17 −1.0−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4radialdistancetraveledinau050100150200numberofparticlesτs=1.9·10−6τs=6.1·10−6τs=1.9·10−1τs=1.9·100Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability cm - - - - - τeddy,z at 5 au stopping time τs at 5 au 1.9 · 10−6 6.1 · 10−6 1.9 · 10−5 6.1 · 10−5 1.9 · 10−4 6.1 · 10−4 1.9 · 10−3 6.1 · 10−3 1.9 · 10−2 6.1 · 10−2 1.9 · 10−1 6.1 · 10−1 1.9 · 100 6.1 · 100 1.9 · 101 hp,z hgas 1.0 · 100 9.9 · 10−1 9.3 · 10−1 8.5 · 10−1 8.3 · 10−1 7.6 · 10−1 6.6 · 10−1 5.1 · 10−1 4.3 · 10−1 3.0 · 10−1 1.9 · 10−1 9.4 · 10−2 3.5 · 10−2 1.8 · 10−2 6.7 · 10−3 radius 1.0 · 10−4 3.2 · 10−4 1.0 · 10−3 3.2 · 10−3 1.0 · 10−2 3.2 · 10−2 1.0 · 10−1 3.2 · 10−1 1.0 · 100 3.2 · 100 1.0 · 101 3.2 · 101 1.0 · 102 3.2 · 102 1.0 · 103 Table 1. Measured dust scale heights and inferred eddy lifetimes, from Eq. (14), for the inviscid isothermal model. A Gaussian f (z) = N0 exp (−(z ± µ)2/(2r2h2 p) was fitted to the data of the vertical distribu- tion to find hp and calculated τeddy. The first five values for τeddy were not calculated, since the gas scale height is nearly equal to the dust scale height. 8.1 · 10−2 1.4 · 10−1 2.1 · 10−1 4.3 · 10−1 6.1 · 10−1 7.0 · 10−1 5.4 · 10−1 2.3 · 10−1 1.9 · 10−1 8.6 · 10−2 (cid:113) hp = (cid:16)(cid:68) h (cid:69) (cid:17) H2Ω2ts/ u2 z teddy where the density of the gas is so small that the drag force can no longer overpower gravity. The particle then can swiftly "surf" on the updraft of the large scale VSI-mode. Since these corruga- tion modes oscillate, the particles will also oscillate around the midplane. For isotropic turbulence Dubrulle et al. (1995) and Zhu et al. (2015) calculate a dust scale height of , + 1 (14) z >= 5· 10−6· u2 where h = H/R is the relative gas scale height. Together with the measured velocity dispersion < u2 K,1au we can use this equation to calculate again the eddy timescale by fitting a Gaussian to the data for different stopping times, thus extracting the dust scale height. Note that for a very small stopping time this does not work, since the dust scale height is equal to the gas scale height, independent of the eddy time scale. Also we super- impose two Gaussian with the same scale height for the distribu- tions with two peaks, which then fits well. These peaks are then usually two scale heights apart for particles with dimensionless stopping time around one. Without this scheme, we would get a larger scale height and thus a larger eddy lifetime, which makes sense, since they are caused by the large scale structures that have a long life time. We present the results in table 1. Again we find τeddy ≈ 0.2, which is similar for other types of turbulence, for example MRI has τeddy ≈ 1 (Youdin & Lithwick 2007; Car- ballido et al. 2011). Note that the larger eddylife times for the larger particles indicate that the eddylife time is large in the mid- plane, since the smaller particles also see the eddylife time of the corona. 4.4. Collision statistics In this section we evaluate the relative velocity distribution for colliding particles. Since we do not have enough particles to di- rectly measure this distribution, we take each particle between Fig. 13. Histogram: Vertical distribution of the particles depending on size, summed over 50 snapshots in the interval from 1200 to 1700 years. Bin size is ∆z = 0.02 au. Fig. 14. Histogram: Relative velocity between particles for different stopping times after 2200 years. The dashed line represents particles of different sizes and the solid lines denote collisions between same sized particles. Only particles with separation smaller than 0.05 au are considered for potential collisions. Lines to guide the eye. 4 and 7 au and check for other particles in a sphere with radius smaller than 0.05 au. To make them independent of translation we remove the Kepler velocity (for independence of radius) and rotate all particles into the same r-θ plane, after we calculate the distance (for independence of the azimuthal angle, since they are all in circular orbits). We then calculate histograms of the rela- tive velocity between two particles depending on the size of the particles. We normalise by the number of particles to get a prob- ability. This can be seen in Fig. 14. Lost by the normalization proce- dure is the fact that there are around 300 same sized particles in the sphere for small particles, while there are around 11000 same sized particles with stopping time around unity in the sphere. Since the median relative velocity for larger particles is reduced by an order of magnitude relative to the smaller particles, the number of collisions will also be reduced. The blue dashed line represents the relative velocity between small and large parti- cles, since those are dominated by the velocity difference that is created by the strongly coupled small particles, moving with the gas, and weakly coupled particles moving with Keplerian veloc- ity. Using an alternative way of estimating the bunching be- haviour of particles, we also calculate the pair correlation func- Article number, page 9 of 17 −0.4−0.20.00.20.4zinau0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5numberofparticles×103τs=1.9·10−6τs=1.9·10−3τs=1.9·10−2τs=1.9·10−1τs=6.1·10−1100101102103104105velocityincm/s0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.45probabilityτs=1.9·10−3-τs=1.9·100τs=1.9·10−6τs=1.9·10−3τs=1.9·10−1τs=1.9·100A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper Fig. 15. Pair correlation function: enhancement of surface density in a shell with radius r for different stopping times. Averaged over 5 snap- shots in the interval from 1800 to 2200 years. tion g(r). g(r) = V πr∆rN2 N(cid:88) N(cid:88) i j(cid:44)i δ(r − di j) (15) where V is the area of integration, di j is the distance between par- ticle i and j and δ(r) is one if r < ∆r/2 and we use ∆r = 0.01 au. This function returns one for Poisson distributed particles and larger than one if there is an increased surface density in the ring around the particles at this radius and thus picks up 2D clustering instead of the 1D clustering in the earlier analysis. We calculate this property for particles between 4 and 7 au projected in the r− φ plane, and show it for different particle sizes in Fig. 15. We can see that small particle positions are uncorrelated, but the par- ticle positions with stopping time near unity display a clear cor- relation, as we could already infer from Fig. 11. Particles with a stopping time closer to unity have a larger correlation length. This makes the VSI a possible candidate to trigger the streaming instability. 5. 3D-simulations: viscosity In this section we present the same simulation but using now a dimensionless kinematic viscosity coefficient of ν = 5 · 10−7, in order to check the influence of viscosity, which in turn influences the α-parameter and the velocity dispersion. We will also add the same amount of viscosity to the model with radiation transport, as shown below. This viscosity corresponds to an α-value of 9 · 10−5 at 5 au or 4 · 10−5 at 25 au. There it will limit the smallest length scale of the VSI, which can not be resolved otherwise. We only show the results if there is a clear difference to the previous simulation. From the hydro-dynamic perspective they are very similar, but the α-parameter is smaller by a factor of 2 and the wavelength of the instability slightly smaller. Fig. 16. The drift velocity of the dust particles depending on the ra- dius of the particles at r = 5 au for a viscous disc. This is compared to expected transport for pressure supported discs. Simulation with reso- lution 1024 × 256 × 64 and viscosity ν = 5 · 10−7. Different colors are used for inward and outward drift. We estimate the error from the radial diffusion coefficent. In Fig. 17 we see that the particles are moving inwards at the midplane and outwards otherwise. The smallest particles fol- low the gas velocity and larger particles are moving outwards away from the midplane faster than the gas, similar to Takeuchi & Lin (2002) where they move outwards even though the gas is moving inwards, due to the gas being super-keplerian in the disc's corona. This leads to a massflow (shown in Fig. 18) that is inward in the midplane and outward farther away from the midplane. As seen in Figs. 17 and 18 small particles (blue and green line) show the same radial velocity profile and mass flux behaviour as the disk's gas flow (black dashed lines). To estimate the overall mean flow of the particles it is necessary to consider the vertical dependence of the mass flow (Fig. 18) rather than the radial velocity z-profile (Fig. 17). For example, from Fig. 17 we notice that the particles with stopping time τ = 6.1 · 10−5 (green line, 3.2 · 10−3 cm radius) move inward slower than the particles with stopping time τ = 6.1 · 10−4 (red line, 3.2 · 10−2 cm radius) even though the mean radial dust velocities in Fig. 16 are smaller for the larger particles. This is due to the different vertical distri- bution of the particles (see Fig. 18 and table 2). In addition, the velocity and mass flow profiles of the smallest displayed parti- cles (blue lines in Figs. 17 and 18, 3.2·10−4 cm radius) look very similar to the particles with stopping time τ = 6.1 · 10−5 (green line), while having drift rates in the opposite direction in Fig. 16. Thus the net particle flow is very sensitive to the gas flow profile and the ratio of particles near the midplane, which is de- cided by the stopping time. This also means that, independent of the mean flow, there will always be a small fraction of particles drifting away from the star, faster than one would expect from diffusion alone. 5.1. Radial drift 5.2. Radial diffusion If we include viscosity and repeat the analysis for radial drift, here from 2700 years to 3700 years, due to the slower diffu- sion, we can see in Fig. 16 that particles larger than about 0.1 cm drift inward with approximately the theoretical speed (see Eq. 11) with slightly larger deviations than in the inviscid case. The smallest particles now clearly drift away from the star at r = 5 au. This is true for different radii of the disc. r >= 1·10−6·u2 The increase in viscosity leads to an decrease of the velocity dis- persion to < u2 Kepler,1au which is smaller by a factor of two. In Fig. 19 we compare our results to theoretical predic- tions with τeddy = 0.1. The diffusion is clearly smaller than in the inviscid case, as predicted by the decreased velocity dispersion. This is in contrast to the vertical eddy lifetime were we measure an increase in eddy lifetime due to vertical diffusion. Article number, page 10 of 17 0.00.10.20.30.40.5distancebetweenparticles100101densityg(r)τs=1.9·10−6τs=1.9·10−2τs=1.9·10−1τs=1.9·10010−410−310−210−1100101102103104105particleradiusincm10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−2driftvelocityinau/yearinwarddrifttheoryoutwarddriftinwarddriftMoritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Fig. 17. The drift velocity of the dust particles at r = 5 au depending on the vertical direction compared to the gas velocity for the simulation with viscosity ν = 5 · 10−7 averaged from 2700 to 3700 years. Fig. 19. Radial diffusion over 1000 years after 2700 years for the simu- lation with viscosity ν = 5 · 10−7. The dashed lines are calculated from theory for the different stopping times and with the same τeddy = 0.1 and < u2 Kepler,1au. Compare with figure 12, but note that here the particles had 10 times as much time to diffuse. gas,radial >= 1· 10−6 · u2 stopping time τs cm τeddy,z at 5 au - - - - - at 5 au 1.9 · 10−6 6.1 · 10−6 1.9 · 10−5 6.1 · 10−5 1.9 · 10−4 6.1 · 10−4 1.9 · 10−3 6.1 · 10−3 1.9 · 10−2 6.1 · 10−2 1.9 · 10−1 6.1 · 10−1 radius 1.0 · 10−4 3.2 · 10−4 1.0 · 10−3 3.2 · 10−3 1.0 · 10−2 3.2 · 10−2 1.0 · 10−1 3.2 · 10−1 1.0 · 100 3.2 · 100 1.0 · 101 3.2 · 101 Table 2. Measured dust scale heights and inferred eddy lifetimes, from Eq. (14), for the viscous isothermal model. We fitted a Gaussian f (z) = N0 exp (−(z ± µ)2/(2r2h2 p)) to the data of the vertical distribution to find hp and calculated τeddy for the simulation with viscosity of 5 · 10−7. 1.0 · 10−1 8.1 · 10−2 1.1 · 10−1 2.2 · 10−1 4.8 · 10−1 8.3 · 10−1 5.2 · 10−1 hp,z hgas 9.5 · 10−1 9.4 · 10−1 1.0 · 100 9.5 · 10−1 8.9 · 10−1 8.0 · 10−1 5.5 · 10−1 3.9 · 10−1 3.3 · 10−1 2.8 · 10−1 2.1 · 10−1 9.4 · 10−2 played particles sizes that the VSI modes have produced nearly axisymmetric clusters. The bunching leading to the ring structure is strongest for the simulation with high viscosity. We also show in Fig. 21 the same effect for the full disc with small viscosity of 10−7 and resolution of 512 × 128 × 512. For this simulation we also increased the number of particles to 500,000. We can see that the ring structure already seen in the histogram of Fig. 9 does indeed persist even in a full disc. Particles with more than a magnitude larger or smaller stopping time do not show this features. 6. 3D-simulations: radiative model In this section we present the results for a radiative disc with ra- diation transport and irradiation from the central star. In contrast to our first paper (Stoll & Kley 2014), we model the stellar ir- radiation in a more realistic fashion as coming from the central star, similar to the treatment in Bitsch et al. (2013). This star has a temperature of 4000 K and a radius of 4 R(cid:12). Article number, page 11 of 17 Fig. 18. The normalised mass flux udriftρ/Σ at r = 5 au for the simulation with viscosity ν = 5 · 10−7 averaged from 2700 to 3700 years. We can also see (right wing of green and blue curves) that a small fraction of the small particles diffuse faster outwards than the rest of the particles. These are particles far away from the midplane, where the stopping time is magnitudes larger, typi- cally larger than 10−2, and the gas flow is in average outwards. These weaker coupled particles can quickly travel a short dis- tance away from the star, before drifting back inwards nearer to the midplane. The difference in radial drift between theory and simulation noticed in Fig. 16 causes the offset for the results of the longer stopping time (red curve). 5.3. Vertical Diffusion For vertical diffusion we obtain slightly larger eddy lifetimes as can be seen in table 2 where we measured from 2700 years to 3700 years. In these simulations it took four times as long for the dust scale height to converge to the gas scale height for the smallest particles, even though the vertical velocity dispersion is identical to the inviscid case. 5.4. Clustering Finally we present the particle distribution in the r − φ plane in Fig. 20. We show the particles with dimensionless stopping time of τs = 0.6 and τs = 1.9 at 5 au. One can see for both dis- −0.4−0.20.00.20.4zinau−0.20.00.20.40.60.8radialvelocityinuK,1au×10−3τs=6.1·10−6τs=6.1·10−5τs=6.1·10−4τs=6.1·10−3τs=6.1·10−2gas−0.50.00.5zinau−5−4−3−2−1012normalisedmassflowin1/years×10−4τs=6.1·10−6τs=6.1·10−5τs=6.1·10−4τs=6.1·10−3gas−0.4−0.3−0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4radialdistancetraveledinau020406080100120140numberofparticlesτs=6.1·10−5τs=1.9·10−4τs=6.1·10−3A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper Fig. 20. Dust distribution for the disc with viscosity of 5 · 10−7. Shown are the particles with dimensionless stopping time τs = 0.6 (left panel) and τs = 1.9 (right panel) at 5 au. Fig. 22. The vertical temperature profile for the irradiated disc in the quasi-equilibrium state at different distances from the central star. velocities in the whole disc. to a new equilibrium with T = 900 K · r−0.6/r0 in the corona and T = 700 K · rq/r0 in the midplane, where the temperature gradient exponent q varies slightly around the mean of q = −0.9, from q = −1.1 in the inner region to q = −0.6 in the outer region. During the evolution to the new equilibrium we damp the We add a small viscosity of ν = 5 · 10−7. This suppresses the VSI in the inner region, where it would otherwise be weakly ac- tive, but due to a wavelength on grid scale clearly not resolved, which in turn would lead to unphysical numerical artifacts. As shown above, we observe only a small change of the VSI activ- ity in the active domain with viscosity enabled compared to the inviscid case. Thus we see no harm in adding it. In our first paper on the behaviour of the VSI in radiative discs we considered only vertical irradiation onto the disc sur- faces (Stoll & Kley 2014). Here, we make the simulations more realistic and irradiate the disc from a central stellar source from the origin along the radial direction, see Bitsch et al. (2013). In this procedure the inner rim of the disc in our simulation is di- rectly exposed to the stellar irradiation. To prevent unphysical heating of the midplane at the inner boundary, we absorb the irradiation flux coming from the star in a fictitious ghost cells with a width 0.25 au using the gas properties of the adjacent in- nermost active cells of the domain. For the irradiation opacity we choose a value 10 times higher than the gas opacity, to compensate for the fact, that this radia- tion is emitted by a hot star and not the surrounding gas. This leads to a heated corona with a cooler midplane as can be seen in Fig. 22, instead of the cooler corona in Stoll & Kley (2014). At the boundary of the corona we can also see a change in the VSI mode. They have a larger wavelength in the hotter corona region and split where the temperature changes to a smaller wavelength in the midplane, see lower panel Fig. 24. To make a direct comparision between the isothermal and radiative case, we ran an additional isothermal model with p = −1.8 and q = −0.9 and ν = 5 · 10−5 and damping in the ver- tical and radial velocity in the region between 8 and 10 au to avoid boundary effects. In principle one could also compare the radiative case directly to the isothermal models from section 4, because in isothermal simulations the unit of length is not fixed and can be scaled to a different regime. However, the gradients in density and temperature are not the same. We thus included a new isothermal model that can be directly compared to. Fig. 21. Dust distribution for the full disc with viscosity of 10−7. Shown are the particles with dimensionless stopping time τs = 0.6. For this simulation we added 500,000 particles of the same size after 3400 years and let them evolve for 400 years. 6.1. Setup For this simulation we have to take into account that the cooling time has to be sufficiently small for the VSI to be active (Nelson et al. 2013; Lin & Youdin 2015), which made changes in the domain necessary. We moved the radial extent of the disc for the inner boundary from 2 to 8 au and for the outer boundary from 10 to 80 au. This radial range is expected to be the active region of the VSI (Lin & Youdin 2015). We simulate again one eighth of the disc in the azimuthal direction and this domain is resolved by 1200 × 260 × 60 grid cells. We also changed the density profile exponent from p = −1.5 to a value that is more in line with the observations p = −1.8 (Williams & Cieza 2011). Initially the temperature drops with T = T0 · r−1/r0, thus we have ρ = 10−9 g/cm3 · r−1.8/r0. This translates to Σ = 1700 g/cm2 at 1 au, which corresponds to is the MMSN-model with a shallower decay of the density. The radiation transport then quickly leads Article number, page 12 of 17 -0.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.20.3theta-π/2020406080100120140160180temperatureinK13.1-16.6AU16.7-21.2AU21.4-27.1AU27.3-34.5AU34.9-44.0AU44.6-56.2AUMoritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability ηrad = 4λacT 3 κRρ2cv (16) where λ is the flux limiter, a the radiation constant, c the speed of light and κR the Rosseland mean opacity. To calculate the cooling time we also need the appropriate length scale. For the optically thick region we simply take the length scale of the perturbation, which we approximate as a fourth of the scale height lthick = H/4. In the optically thin region we use the optical mean free path lthin = 1/κRρ for the length scale. This leads to a combined dimensionless cooling time of Fig. 23. The α-parameter for the irradiated disc, calculated with time averaging. We average from 7500 years to 37500 years using 60 snap- shots. Fig. 24. The dimensionless cooling time (upper panel) and vertical ve- locity (lower panel) for the irradiated disc after 13500 years. The top panel shows the upper half of the disc while the lower panel the lower one at the same time slice. The black line indicates the location of the critical cooling time τcrit (see text), which separates the active from the inactive region. 6.2. Hydrodynamic properties We begin by presenting the α-parameter in Fig. 23, here calcu- lated by time averaging the azimuthal velocity, since the equi- librium velocity cannot be computed analytically for radiative discs with a vertically varying temperature. In the inner region the VSI is suppressed by the viscosity of ν = 5 · 10−7 on small wavelengths and by the high cooling time on large wavelengths. Compare this to the isothermal simulation, where the same vis- cosity is not able to suppress even at 4 au (see Fig. 3). This is followed by an active region beginning at 15 au where we reach α = (1 − 4) · 10−4, which is still smaller than the isothermal simulations. The drop off in the outer region may be linked to the reduced activity in this region, see also Fig. 24, but is also visible in the isothermal model. As the VSI is critically dependent on small cooling times, we analyse the cooling times due to radiative diffusion in the irradi- ated disc models. The radiative diffusion coefficient is given by: τcool = l2 thick thin + l2 ηrad ΩK . (17) In Fig. 24 we compare the cooling time, τcool, as calculated from our numerical irradiated disc models with the critical cooling time, τcrit, as estimated by Lin & Youdin (2015), who compared the destabilising vertical shear rates with the stabilising vertical buoyancy frequency. They obtained τcrit = hq 1 − γ . (18) We see a good agreement in the inner region between the ac- tive regions as predicted by the critical cooling time and the active regions in our simulation. The inner midplane region up to 10 au is completely inactive and the following region which is also predicted to be inactive is only active with a higher or- der mode. Note that without viscosity one expects modes with higher wavenumber in this region. In the outer region beyond 60 au the VSI is inactive despite a small enough cooling time. This may be due the dynamics of the VSI that shows larger wavelengths in the outer region, thus requiring a smaller cooling time, or to boundary effects. One can also see that the jump in temperature and cooling time, that also defines the boundary between disc and corona, creates a boundary for the VSI, where the surface modes can attach to (Barker & Latter 2015). 6.3. Dust properties For this simulation we add 20,000 particles per size after 1000 years. In Fig. 25 we present a histogram of the distribution of particles with a size of 31cm, after 13500 years. We see that in the outer region with the inactive VSI the particles are still Poisson distributed, but in the active region they are caught in the eddies. The particles in the outer region are only collected weakly, since the VSI is reduced, due to the large cooling time. The isothermal case we compare to has clustering throughout the whole disc and the overdensities are stronger by a factor of around two, even though the velocity dispersion is higher by a factor of 5 to 10. These results show that even with realistic cooling times, the VSI can create small axisymmetric regions with overdensities in the dust by a factor of three. This is the right range of metallicity and size of particles which is needed for the streaming instability to set in (Youdin & Goodman 2005). This instability can further enhance the clumping until gravity is strong enough to directly form planetesimals out of the cluster of particles. In Fig. 26 we repeat the statistical analysis for the distribu- tion of particles. We take into account all particles in the region from 15 to 40 au, in the timespan between 11000 and 13500 Article number, page 13 of 17 1020304050radiusinau10−510−410−3Reynoldsstress/<P>radiativeisothermA&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper Fig. 25. Histogram of particles with size of 31cm and stopping time τs = 0.2, after 13500 years. We divide the radial domain from 8 to 80 au into 1000 bins and count the number of particles in each bin. The average number of particles per bin is 20.0. Fig. 27. The drift velocity of the dust particles depending on the radius of the particles. This is compared to expected transport for pressure sup- ported discs. Results are shown for the radiative simulation with irradi- ation, resolution 1024× 256× 64 and viscosity ν = 5· 10−7 at r = 20 au. Different colors are used for inward and outward drift. We estimate the error from the radial diffusion coefficent. Fig. 26. Probability to find a certain number of particles in a radial bin with ∆r = 0.05 au. The dashed-dotted lines correspond to the isother- mal model. years over 50 snapshots. Note that the average number of par- ticles per bin is the same as in the isothermal case in the earlier section, since we increased the size of the bins to compensate for the lower density of particles. Again we see a clear deviation from the initial Poisson distribution for the particles with stop- ping time around unity, even though it is weaker. Interestingly the effect is now most powerful for τs = 6.3· 10−2 (particles with 10 cm radius), where the inward drift velocity for the particles and the inward drift of the vertical motion of the VSI mode is the same, thus the particles move with the bunching gas mode instead of through the mode. Those are only bunched at around 30 au, and are diffused again after they have passed this region. This resonance does not exist in the isothermal case, because the wavelength is larger than in the radiative case. The isothermal case in general behaves very similar to the isothermal case in the earlier section. Both show the strongest bunching for particles with stopping time close to unity. The radial drift shown in Fig. 27 measured at 20 ± 2 au from 13500 years to 18500 years is similar to the isothermal case with the same viscosity. While the outward migration is no longer as clear as in the isothermal case with viscosity, there is still a trend to outward migration. That the effect is weaker can be explained by the weaker effect the viscosity has at 20 au. More important for the radial motion of a single particle is the diffusion. For the radial and vertical velocity dispersion in the region at 20 ± 5 au we measure for the radiative case Article number, page 14 of 17 Fig. 28. Radial diffusion after 11000 years for 500 years for the radia- tive simulation with irradiation and viscosity ν = 5 · 10−7. The black dashed lines are calculated from theory for the different stopping times and with the same τeddy = 1.0 and < u2 Kepler,1au. The isothermal simulation (dashed lines) has a velocity dispersion of < u2 gas,radial >= 5 · 10−8 · u2 gas,radial >= 5 · 10−7 · u2 Kepler,1au. z >= 5·10−7·u2 r >= 5 · 10−7 · u2 r >= 5·10−8·u2 z >= 2· 10−6 · u2 Kepler,1au and < u2 < u2 Kepler,1au and for the isothermal case we measure < u2 Kepler,1au and < u2 Kepler,1au. Both values lead to a dimensionless eddy time of τeddy = 1.0 even though the velocity dispersion dif- fers by a factor of ten. The larger difference between prediction and simulation in Fig. 28 results from the error in the measure- ment of q, the exponent in the radial temperature distribution. Here, T(r) is determined through the radiation transport and q varies now with radius. For the plot we use an average value of q = −1.1. In table 3 we can see that in this simulation the dust scale height is smaller than the gas scale height even for the smallest particles. We averaged from 13500 years to 18500 years. In this simulation the radial and vertical calculated eddy lifetimes are again very similar, despite the turbulence not being isotropic. For the collision statistics we increased the cutoff distance within which we compare particle velocities to 0.2 au to com- pensate the decreased density of particles. As the distribution of particles already indicated the clustering is indeed weaker. This is reflected additionally in Fig. 30, where we can see that the cor- 10203040506070radiusinau020406080100120140160numberofparticlesisothermradiative020406080100numberofparticlesinbin10−410−310−210−1100probabilityτs=6.4·10−7τs=2.0·10−2τs=6.4·10−2τs=2.0·10−1τs=6.4·10−1τs=2.0·100poisson10−410−310−210−1100101102103104105particleradiusincm10−910−810−710−610−510−410−310−2driftvelocityinau/yearinwarddrifttheoryoutwarddriftinwarddrift−3.5−3.0−2.5−2.0−1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.0radialdistancetraveledinau050100150200250numberofparticlesτs=6.4·10−7τs=2.0·10−4τs=2.0·10−1τs=2.0·100Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability stopping time τs cm teddy,z at 20 au - - - hp,z hgas 9.4 · 10−1 9.4 · 10−1 9.5 · 10−1 8.0 · 10−1 8.7 · 10−1 8.7 · 10−1 6.6 · 10−1 5.4 · 10−1 4.2 · 10−1 3.4 · 10−1 2.3 · 10−1 8.9 · 10−2 3.1 · 10−2 1.5 · 10−2 4.1 · 10−3 at 20 au 6.3 · 10−7 2.0 · 10−6 6.3 · 10−6 2.0 · 10−5 6.3 · 10−5 2.0 · 10−4 6.3 · 10−4 2.0 · 10−3 6.3 · 10−3 2.0 · 10−2 6.3 · 10−2 2.0 · 10−1 6.3 · 10−1 2.0 · 100 6.3 · 100 radius 1.0 · 10−4 3.2 · 10−4 1.0 · 10−3 3.2 · 10−3 1.0 · 10−2 3.2 · 10−2 1.0 · 10−1 3.2 · 10−1 1.0 · 100 3.2 · 100 1.0 · 101 3.2 · 101 1.0 · 102 3.2 · 102 1.0 · 103 Table 3. Measured dust scale heights and inferred eddy lifetimes, from Eq. (14), for the radiative model. We fitted a Gaussian f (z) = N0 exp (−(z ± µ)2/(2r2h2 p) to the data of the vertical distribution to find hp and calculated τeddy for the irradiated simulation with viscosity of 5 · 10−7. 1.3 · 10−2 7.3 · 10−2 2.4 · 10−1 1.8 · 10−1 3.1 · 10−1 5.0 · 10−1 9.9 · 10−1 1.3 · 100 5.9 · 10−1 2.3 · 10−1 1.6 · 10−1 3.9 · 10−2 Fig. 29. Histogram: Relative velocity between particles of the same size for different stopping times after 11000 years for the irradiated simula- tion. The dotted lines correspond to two different particle sizes as in- dicated in the legend. The dashed lines correspond to the isothermal model. Lines to guide the eye. relation is slightly weaker. For this radiative case the effect ap- pears to be strongest for a dimensionless stopping time τs ≈ 0.1 instead of 1 for the isothermal case. The correlation length is larger for the particles with stopping time around one, reflecting the larger wavelength of the VSI in the isothermal case. The histogram of the relative velocities between particles as displayed in Fig. 29 illustrates this situation. For τs ≈ 0.1 the particles have about an order of magnitude smaller relative ve- locities than for large and small values. We can also see that the larger velocity dispersion in the isothermal model leads to larger relative velocities. 7. Summary and conclusions In the paper we analyzed the dynamics of particles embedded in hydrodynamic discs that show fully developed turbulence as induced by the VSI. In a first step we calculated isothermal disc models in full three dimensions and analyzed the properties of the turbulence Fig. 30. Pair correlation function for the irradiated simulation: enhance- ment of surface density in a shell with radius r for different stopping times. Averaged over 5 snapshots in the interval from 11000 to 13500 years. The dashed lines correspond to the isothermal model. generated by the VSI. Our standard model consisted of an eighth of a full circle (φmax = π/4) and showed in the fully developed turbulent state α-values around 6· 10−4, which is of the same or- der of magnitude or even slightly larger than the corresponding 2D models (Stoll & Kley 2014). The 3D models shows vari- ations in the azimuthal direction and these fluctuations follow a Kolmogorov-type spectrum. The mean radial velocity of the gas in a VSI turbulent disc turned out to be directed inward in the disc midplane and outward in the upper layers, in agreement with global MHD simulations using zero net vertical magnetic flux (Flock et al. 2011). This flow is opposite to viscous laminar discs (Urpin 1984; Kley & Lin 1992) or MHD discs with non- zero vertical magenetic field (Suzuki & Inutsuka 2014). For 3D discs covering the full circle (φmax = 2π) we found very sim- ilar results, which allowed us to treat particle evolution in the reduced domain. In addition to the isothermal case we studied fully radia- tive models including heating from the central star. To allow for regimes where the VSI instability can operate we extended to ra- dial domain from 8−80 au. The temperature structure in the disc displayed a central disc region with a nearly constant tempera- ture in the vertical direction and hotter surface layers produced by the stellar irradiation. The vertically varying opacity in the disc resulted in different cooling times and the turbulence turned out to be slightly weaker in comparison to the purely isothermal situation. For the effective α-parameter values of around 10−4 were reached in the active state that extended from about 10 to 60 au. After having reached the equilibrium state we inserted parti- cles of different sizes to study their motion in the disc, where the drag force between gaseous disc and particles was treated in the Epstein regime. Overall we found for both, isothermal and radia- tive discs comparable results. On average the particles drift in- wards with the expected speed. For all disc models we found that the smallest particles show an outwardly directed radial drift. This comes about because the small particles are coupled more to the gas flow and are lifted upward by the vertical motions of the VSI induced large scale flows. Since the average flow di- rection in the upper layers is positive small dust particles that are elevated above the disk's midplane are dragged along and move outwards. Particles below about 1 mm in size experience this fate. This outward drift might be beneficial in transporting strongly heated solid material to larger radii as required to ex- plain for example the presence of chondrules at larger radii in Article number, page 15 of 17 101102103104velocityincm/s0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.35probabilityτs=10−6.2−τs=10−1.2τs=10−6.2τs=10−1.7τs=10−1.2τs=10−0.70123456distancebetweenparticles100101densityg(r)τs=6.4·10−7τs=6.4·10−2τs=2.0·10−1τs=6.4·10−1τs=2.0·100A&A proofs: manuscript no. vsi-paper the Solar System (Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2002). The upward drift of small particles in the disc by the VSI modes will also help to explain the observed presence of a population small par- ticles in the later stages of the disc evolution that were produced by a fragmentation process (Dullemond & Dominik 2005). Using the information of histograms, probability functions and pair correlation functions we analyzed the spatial re- distribution of particles in the disc that were initially homo- geneously distributed. We found that the particles are strongly 'bunched' together by the large scale motions of the VSI tur- bulence. The bunching effect is strongest for particles with a stopping time of the order unity and the maximum overdensities reached were about 5 times the average initial density of the par- ticles. The relative velocity between particles of the same size is smallest (about a few m/s) for those particles that show the strongest bunching. This combination of high density and low relative speed is highly beneficial for the early formation pro- cess of planetary precursors. First, at these relative speeds colli- sions between two particles can lead to sticking collisions (Blum & Wurm 2008; Meru et al. 2013). The higher relative velocities between particles of different sizes does not necessarily lead to fragmentation. The experiments of Teiser & Wurm (2009) have shown that particles with different size can stick to each other even for collisions up to 50 m/s and possibly more. Secondly, through the concentration of particles it is possible to trigger streaming instabilities in the disc which can further increase the particle concentration and growth (Youdin & Goodman 2005). The two dimensional distribution of particles in the disc shows axisymmetric ring-like concentration zones of the parti- cles resembling very roughly the features observed recently in the disc around HL Tau (ALMA Partnership et al. 2015). Even though the strongest effect is seen here in our simulations for particles about one meter in size, it is possible that through collisions of nearly equal sized bodies much smaller particles that could generate the observed emission can be produced and which follow a similar spatial distribution. Obviously the ob- served spacing of the 'bright' rings in our simulations is smaller than those observed in HL Tau but the inclusion of variations in opacity or chemical abundances may create larger coherent structures. Acknowledgements. Moritz Stoll received financial support from the Landes- graduiertenförderung of the state of Baden-Württemberg and through the Ger- man Research Foundation (DFG) grant KL 650/16. Simulations were performed on the bwGRiD cluster in Tübingen or the ForHLR cluster in Karlsruhe (both funded by the DFG and the Ministry for Science, Research and Arts of the state Baden-Württemberg), and the cluster of the Forschergruppe FOR 759 "The For- mation of Planets: The Critical First Growth Phase" funded by the DFG. References ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3 Arlt, R. & Urpin, V. 2004, A&A, 426, 755 Armitage, P. J. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 195 Bai, X.-N. 2014, ApJ, 791, 137 Bai, X.-N. 2015, ApJ, 798, 84 Bai, X.-N. & Stone, J. M. 2010, ApJS, 190, 297 Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1 Barker, A. J. & Latter, H. N. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 21 Bitsch, B., Crida, A., Morbidelli, A., Kley, W., & Dobbs-Dixon, I. 2013, A&A, Blum, J. & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21 Bockelée-Morvan, D., Gautier, D., Hersant, F., Huré, J.-M., & Robert, F. 2002, 549, A124 A&A, 384, 1107 Carballido, A., Bai, X.-N., & Cuzzi, J. N. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 93 Dubrulle, B. 1992, A&A, 266, 592 Dubrulle, B., Morfill, G., & Sterzik, M. 1995, Icarus, 114, 237 Dullemond, C. P. & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971 Article number, page 16 of 17 Epstein, P. S. 1924, Physical Review, 23, 710 Flaig, M., Ruoff, P., Kley, W., & Kissmann, R. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2419 Flock, M., Dzyurkevich, N., Klahr, H., Turner, N. J., & Henning, T. 2011, ApJ, 735, 122 Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition Fricke, K. 1968, ZAp, 68, 317 Fromang, S. & Nelson, R. P. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L81 Goldreich, P. & Schubert, G. 1967, The Astrophysical Journal, 150, 571 Gressel, O., Turner, N. J., Nelson, R. P., & McNally, C. P. 2015, ApJ, 801, 84 Johansen, A. & Klahr, H. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 634, 1353 Klahr, H. H. & Bodenheimer, P. 2003, ApJ, 582, 869 Kley, W. & Lin, D. N. C. 1992, ApJ, 397, 600 Kolb, S. M., Stute, M., Kley, W., & Mignone, A. 2013, A&A, 559, A80 Lin, D. N. C. & Pringle, J. E. 1987, MNRAS, 225, 607 Lin, M.-K. & Youdin, A. N. 2015, ApJ, 811, 17 Meru, F., Geretshauser, R. J., Schäfer, C., Speith, R., & Kley, W. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2371 Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228 Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., & Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375 Nelson, R. P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O. M. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2610 Nelson, R. P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O. M. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Ruden, S. P., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Lin, D. N. C. 1988, ApJ, 329, 739 Stoll, M. H. R. & Kley, W. 2014, A&A, 572, A77 Suzuki, T. K. & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2014, ApJ, 784, 121 Takeuchi, T. & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, ApJ, 581, 1344 Teiser, J. & Wurm, G. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1584 Urpin, V. 2003, A&A, 404, 397 Urpin, V. A. 1984, Soviet Ast., 28, 50 Williams, J. P. & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67 Youdin, A. N. & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin, A. N. & Lithwick, Y. 2007, Icarus, 192, 588 Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., & Bai, X.-N. 2015, ApJ, 801, 81 Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., Rafikov, R. R., & Bai, X.-n. 2014, ApJ, 785, 122 Appendix A: Particle Solver To verify the correct implementation of our particle solver we repeat some of the tests of Zhu et al. (2014). Appendix A.1: Orbit test We release the particle at r = 1, at the midplane with a velocity of uφ = 0.7 and integrate for 20 orbits. The presented timesteps are ∆t = 0.1 and ∆t = 0.01 for an orbital time of 2π. Even though the orbit precesses for the larger timestep, the geometric property is conserved. There is no visible precession in Fig. A.1 for the timestep of ∆t = 0.01, which we use in our simulations. Fig. A.1. The orbital evolution of a test particle on an eccentric orbit. −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.5xinau−1.0−0.50.00.5yinau∆t=0.1∆t=0.01Moritz H. R. Stoll and Wilhelm Kley: Particle dynamics in discs with turbulence generated by the vertical shear instability Fig. A.2. The settling of test particles with different stopping times. Appendix A.2: Settling test We release particles with different stopping times at one scale height from the midplane. For particles with τs < 1 we can see in Fig. A.2 the exponential decay of the vertical position. Parti- cles with τs > 1 oscillate around the midplane and instead the amplitude decays exponentially. Appendix A.3: Drift test For the drift test we use the disc in hydrostatic equilibrium and release particles with different stopping times at r = 5au on Kep- lerian orbits in Fig. A.3. We compare to the theoretical expected drift velocity of Eq. (11) (black line). Fig. A.3. The drift velocity for particles with different stopping times. Article number, page 17 of 17 024681012timeinorbits−0.06−0.04−0.020.000.020.040.06heightinauτs=1τs=10τs=0.1τs=0.010123456789timeinorbits10−810−710−610−510−410−310−2vdτs=10τs=1τs=0.1τs=0.01τs=0.001τs=0.00001
1202.1954	1	1202	2012-02-09T11:15:04	The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Relations between the length of a sunspot cycle and the average temperature in the same and the next cycle are calculated for a number of meteorological stations in Norway and in the North Atlantic region. No significant trend is found between the length of a cycle and the average temperature in the same cycle, but a significant negative trend is found between the length of a cycle and the temperature in the next cycle. This provides a tool to predict an average temperature decrease of at least 1.0 "C from solar cycle 23 to 24 for the stations and areas analyzed. We find for the Norwegian local stations investigated that 25-56% of the temperature increase the last 150 years may be attributed to the Sun. For 3 North Atlantic stations we get 63-72% solar contribution. This points to the Atlantic currents as reinforcing a solar signal.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24 Department of Physics and Technology, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway Jan-Erik Solheim∗ Kjell Stordahl Telenor Norway, Fornebu, Norway Ole Humlum Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Norway Department of Geology, University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), Svalbard Abstract Relations between the length of a sunspot cycle and the average temperature in the same and the next cycle are calculated for a number of meteorological stations in Norway and in the North Atlantic region. No significant trend is found between the length of a cycle and the average temperature in the same cycle, but a significant negative trend is found between the length of a cycle and the temperature in the next cycle. This provides a tool to predict an average temperature decrease of at least 1.0 ◦C from solar cycle 23 to 24 for the stations and areas analyzed. We find for the Norwegian local stations investigated that 25–56% of the temperature increase the last 150 years may be attributed to the Sun. For 3 North Atlantic stations we get 63–72% solar contribution. This points to the Atlantic currents as reinforcing a solar signal. ∗Corresponding Author Email addresses: [email protected] (Jan-Erik Solheim), [email protected] (Kjell Stordahl), [email protected] (Ole Humlum) Preprint submitted to Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial PhysicsDecember 21, 2013 Keywords: Solar cycle lengths, Climate change, Forecasts, North Atlantic climate response 1. Introduction The question of a possible relation between solar activity and the Earth’s climate has received considerable attention during the last 200 years. Periods with many sunspots and faculae correspond with periods with higher irra- diance in the visual spectrum and even stronger response in the ultraviolet, which acts on the ozone level. It is also proposed that galactic cosmic rays can act as cloud condensation nuclei, which may link variations in the cloud coverage to solar activity, since more cosmic rays penetrate the Earth’s mag- netic field when the solar activity is low. A review of possible connections between the Sun and the Earth’s climate is given by Gray et al. (2010). Based on strong correlation between the production rate of the cosmo- genic nucleids 14C and 10Be and proxies for sea ice drift, Bond et al. (2001) concluded that extremely weak pertubations in the Sun’s energy output on decadal to millennial time scales generate a strong climate response in the North Atlantic deep water (NADW). This affects the global thermohaline circulation and the global climate. The possible sun-ocean-climate connec- tion may be detectable in temperature series from the North Atlantic re- gion. Since the ocean with its large heat capacity can store and transport huge amounts of heat, a time lag between solar activity and air tempera- ture increase is expected. An observed time lag gives us an opportunity for forecasting, which is the rationale for the present investigation. Comparing sunspot numbers with the Northern Hemisphere land temper- ature anomaly, Friis-Christensen & Lassen (1991) noticed a similar behavior of temperature and sunspot numbers from 1861 to 1990, but it seemed that the sunspot number R appeared to lag the temperature anomaly. They found a much better correlation between the solar cycle length (SCL) and the tem- perature anomaly. In their study they used a smoothed mean value for the SCL with 5 solar cycles weighted 1-2-2-2-1. They correlated the temperature during the central sunspot cycle of the filter with this smoothed weighted mean value for SCL. The reason for choosing this type of filter was that it has traditionally been used to describe long time trends in solar activity. However, it is surprising that the temperature was not smoothed the same way. In a follow up paper Reichel et al. (2001) concluded that the right cause- and-effect ordering, in the sense of Granger causality, is present between the 2 8 10 12 14 ) r y ( h t g n e L Solar Cycle length 8 10 12 14 1700 1750 1800 1850 Year 1900 1950 2000 Figure 1: Length of solar cycles (inverted) 1700-2009.The last point refers to SC23 which is 12.2 years long. The gradual decrease in solar cycle length 1850-2000 is indicated with a straight line. smoothed SCL and the cycle mean temperature anomaly for the Northern Hemisphere land air temperature in the twentieth century at the 99% signifi- cance level. This suggests that there may exist a physical mechanism linking solar activity to climate variations. The length of a solar cycle is determined as the time from the appearance of the first spot in a cycle at high solar latitude, to the disappearance of the last spot in the same cycle near the solar equator. However, before the last spot in a cycle disappears, the first spot in the next cycle appears at high latitude, and there is normally a two years overlap. The time of the minimum is defined as the central time of overlap between the two cycles (Waldmeier, 1939), and the length of a cycle can be measured between successive minima or maxima. A recent description of how the time of minimum is calculated is given by NGDC (2011): ”When observations permit, a date selected as either a cycle minimum or maximum is based in part on an average of the times extremes are reached in the monthly mean sunspot number, in the smoothed monthly mean sunspot number, and in the monthly mean number of spot groups alone. Two more measures are used at time of sunspot minimum: the number of spotless days and the frequency of occurrence of old and new cycle spot groups.” It was for a long time thought that the appearance of a solar cycle was a random event, which means for each cycle length and amplitude were in- dependent of the previous. However, Dicke (1978) showed that an internal chronometer has to exist inside the Sun, which after a number of short cycles, reset the cycle length so the average length of 11.2 years is kept. Richards et 3 al. (2009) analyzed the length of cycles 1610-2000 using median trace analy- ses of the cycle lengths and power spectrum analyses of the O − C residuals of the dates of sunspot maxima and minima. They identified a period of 188 ± 38 yr. They also found a correspondence between long cycles and minima of number of spots. Their study suggests that the length of sunspot cycles should increase gradually over the next ∼ 75 yr. accompanied by a gradual decrease in the number of sunspots. An autocorrelation study by Solanki et al. (2002) showed that the length of a solar cycle is a good predictor for the maximum sunspot number in the next cycle, in the sense that short cycles predict high Rmax and long cycles predict small Rmax . They explain this with the solar dynamo having a memory of the previous cycle’s length. Assuming a relation between the sunspot number and global tempera- ture, the secular periodic change of SCL may then correlate with the global temperature, and as long as we are on the ascending (or descending) branches of the 188 yr period, we may predict a warmer (or cooler) climate. It was also demonstrated (Friis-Christensen & Lassen, 1992; Hoyt and Schatten, 1993; Lassen & Friis-Christensen, 1995) that the correlation be- tween SCL and climate probably has been in operation for centuries. A statistical study of 69 tree rings sets, covering more than 594 years, and SCL demonstrated that wider tree-rings (better growth conditions) were associ- ated with shorter sunspot cycles (Zhou and Butler, 1998). The relation between the smoothed SCL and temperature worked well as long as SCL decreased as shown in figure 1. But when the short cycle SC22 was finished Thejll & Lassen (2000) reported a developing inconsistency. In order to explain the high temperatures at the turn of the millennium, the not yet finished SC23 had to be shorter than 8 years, which was very unlikely, since there had never been observed two such short cycles in a row (see fig. 1). They concluded that the type of solar forcing described with this SCL model had ceased to dominate the temperature change. Since the final length of SC23 became 12.2 yrs, the discrepancy became even bigger. A more rigorous analysis was done by Thejll (2009), this time with a filter 1-2-1 also used for temperature. In particular he investigated if the residuals from the relation between Northern Hemisphere (NH) land (t121 ) and SCL121 were independent and identically distributed. He also investigated possible lags between SCL121 and t121 , and found that time lags of 6 or 12 years were necessary to obtain zero serial correlation in residuals in the data set used by Friis-Christensen & Lassen (1991). For updated NH-land series from the 4 HadCRU Centre, serial correlation in residuals could not be removed (Thejll, 2009). In addition to the relation between solar cycle length and the amplitude of the next Rmax , it is reasonable to expect a time lag for the locations investigated, since heat from the Sun, amplified by various mechanisms, is stored in the ocean mainly near the Equator, and transported into the North Atlantic by the Gulf Stream to the coasts of Northern Europe. An example of time lags along the Norwegian coast is an advective delay between the Faroe-Shetland Channel and the Barents Sea of about 2 years determined from sea temperature measurements (Yndestad et al., 2008). Formation of NADW represents transfer of upper level water to large depths. The water is transported and spread throughout the Atlantic and exported to the Indian and Pacific oceans before updwelling in Antarcic wa- ters. The return flow of warm water from the Pacific through the Indian ocean and the Caribbean to the North Atlantic, a distance of 40 000 km, takes from 13 to 130 years (Gordon, 1986). There appears to be solar ”fin- gerprints” that can be detected in climate time series in other parts of the world with each series having a unique time lag between the solar signal and the hydro-climatic response. Perry (2007) reports that a solar signal com- posed of geomagnetic aa-index and total solar irradiance (TSI) is detected with various lags from zero years (Indian Ocean) to 34 years (Mississippi river flow) and 70 years (Labrador Sea ice). Mehl et al. (2009) have shown that two mechanisms: the top-down stratospheric response of ozone to fluctuations of shortwave solar forcing and the bottom-up coupled ocean-atmospheric sur- face response, acting together, can amplify a solar cyclical pulse with a factor 4 or more. Since our stations are located near or in the North Atlantic, solar signals in climatic time series may arrive with delays of decades. If we can detect a solar signal and measure the delay for individual regions, we may have a method for future climate predictions. Recognizing that averaged temperature series from different meteorologi- cal stations of variable quality and changing locations may contain errors, and partially unknown phenomena derived from the averaging procedure, But- ler (1994) proposed instead to use long series of high quality single stations. This might improve the correlation between SCL and temperature. He showed that this was the case when using temperature series obtained at the Armagh Observatory in Northern Ireland 1844-1990. Since the Ar- magh series correlated strongly with the NH temperature, he concluded that this indicates that solar activity, or something closely related to it, has had a 5 dominant influence on the temperature of the lower atmosphere in the North- ern Hemisphere over the past 149 years (Butler, 1994). This investigation was later expanded to the period 1795-1995 by Butler & Johnston (1994), who found a relation tARM = 14.42 − 0.5LSC , where LSC is the smoothed length of the solar cycle determined by the 1-2-2-2-1 filter. They concluded that the good fit over nearly 200 years indicated that solar activity had been the dominant factor for nearly two centuries. Butler & Johnston (1996), studying the same dataset, noticed that there seemed to be about one solar cycle delay between the shortest cycle lengths and the temperature peaks. They therefore compared the smoothed value of SCL with the temperature 11 years later, whereby the correlations im- proved. They also compared the correlations with the raw, (unsmoothed) times of minima and maxima, filter 1-2-1, and the 1-2-2-2-1 filter, and found that relations were approximately the same, but the correlations improved significantly with the length of the filter. They interpreted this as the link between the solar dynamo and the mean air temperature at Armagh is a gradual process that becomes more evident when SCL is smoothed over sev- eral sunspot cycles. They also found that temperatures shifted 11 years back in time, correlated better with SCL measured between minima than between maxima. In figure 1, the length of sunspot cycles between successive minima is plotted inverted. Peaks in this curve preceded peaks in the Armagh temper- ature curve, and bumps preceded colder periods. A straight line with slope β = −(0.012 ± 0.004)yr−1 represents the average change in sunspot cycle length in the period 1843-1996. Another study by Wilson (1998) presented extremely good correlations between the temperature series at Armagh and the NH-temperatures (r=0.88) and global temperatures (r=0.83), and explained this with the influence of the ocean. He also found an extremely good negative correlation between the length of the sunspot Hale cycle of about 23 years and the Armagh temper- ature average. In addition to this he also found a good correlation between even and odd sunspot cycles and predicted t=9.24±0.47◦C (90% confidence interval) for SC23. The observed value became 10.1◦C - somewhat higher than predicted. Archibald (2008) was the first to realize that the length of the previous sunspot cycle (PSCL) has a predictive power for the temperature in the next sunspot cycle, if the raw (unsmoothed) value for the SCL is used. Based on the estimated length of SC23 then being 12.6 years, considerably longer than 6 SC22 of 9.6 years1 , he predicted cooling during the coming SC24 for certain locations. He demonstrated this based on a long series from de Bilt in the Nether- lands 1705-2000 which showed a decrease of 0.6◦C per year PSCL and for Hanover NH with a slope of -0.73◦C yr−1 . Other long series he investigated -0.70◦C yr−1 ), Providence, RI (slope: was Portland, ME (slope: -0.62 ◦C yr−1 ), and Archangel, RU with a slope -0.6 ◦C yr−1 PSCL. In his analysis he used both the times between maxima and between minima in the same relations (Archibald, 2010). In the following we will compare the relations between raw (unsmoothed) SCL values and temperatures in the same or in the next sunspot cycles. The use of unsmoothed SLC values may give a better response to the large change in SCL that took place from SC22 to SC23. We will also investigate the relations using different time lags. Our main goal is to investigate the use of PSCL as a tool for temperature predictions at certain locations. In addition we will use the relation between PSCL and temperature to estimate how much of the temperature variations in the series investigated, may be attributed to solar activity. We will also use the PSCL-relations to predict the future temperature changes from SC23 to SC24 - a prediction that may be falsified in less than 10 years. In section 2 we present data sets and methods. In section 3 results, and then discussion and conclusions in sections 4 and 5. 2. Data sets and method Mean annual air temperatures during sunspot cycles, as far as possible back to 1856, which was the start of SC10, are calculated for a selection of Norwegian weather stations, which have long records. Both costal and inland stations are represented. To avoid urban heat effects, only temperature series from places with small populations or stations at lighthouses are analyzed. These are then correlated with the length of the same (SCL) and the previous (PSCL) sunspot cycles. Based on relations determined between PSCL and temperature, temperature forecast for solar cycle 24 are calculated with 95% confidence interval when possible. To investigate the validity of the relations found, also North Atlantic temperature series from Armagh, Archangel, The 1The recent version of SCL numbers obtained from NGDC (2011), used in this work, shows SCL22 = 10.0 and SCL23 = 12.2 years between minima. 7 Figure 2: The location of meteorological stations with temperature series analyzed. Faroe Islands, Iceland, Svalbard and Greenland are analyzed. The location of the stations used is shown in figure 2. We have also determined SCL– and PSCL–relations for composite tem- perature averages for Norway and we have constructed a European mean temperature anomaly based on 60 stations (Europe60), listed and shown on a map (figure A.20) in the appendix. This composite series has an increasing number of stations included with time, as shown in figure A.21. These sta- tions were selected to 1) obtain long data series, 2) obtain good geographical coverage, and 3) to minimize potential effects from urban heat islands. In ad- dition we have investigated the same relations for HadCRUT3N temperature anomalies. As an estimate of a possible solar effect related to PSCL, the coefficient of determination r2 is calculated, where r is the correlation coefficient. In addition we have investigated present autocorrelations in the residuals when the relations between PSCL and temperature is employed, to examine the level of presence of other possible regressors. Finally we have also tested our forecasts by removing the last observation and made a forecast based on the remaining data points. 8 ) r ( n o i t a l e r r o C ) r ( n o i t a l e r r o C -0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.7 -0.9 -0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.7 -0.9 Area Temperatures N. Norway + Archangel Norway D Eur60 Kar Var Arc HadNH Tro C Bod 0 2 4 6 8 Lag (yr) 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 Lag (yr) 10 12 14 North Atlantic Norway - South Arm A Tor Nuu Sva Oks B Uts Dom 0 2 4 Aku 6 8 Lag (yr) 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 Lag (yr) 10 12 14 -0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.7 -0.9 -0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.7 -0.9 Figure 3: Correlations between SCL and 11 years average temperatures as function of time lag after the mid time of the sunspot cycle. 3. Results 3.1. Correlations with time lag As a background for the investigation of possible relations between SCL and temperature in sunspot periods, we determined the correlation between SCL and temperature for variable lags of an 11-year time window. We cal- culated 11 year running mean temperatures for the selected data sets, and correlated this with the SCL with lags from zero to 13 years, calculated from the middle time for each solar cycle. The starting point could also have been chosen as the year of solar maximum or the end year of the sunspot cycle. However, we selected the middle time, since this gave the possibility to check correlations with the same sunspot cycle (lag=0). A lag is defined as later in time (in the future). As input temperature files we used the temperature series shown in figures 4-19, lower panels. The result is displayed in figure 3. The North Atlantic locations (panel A) show a systematic better negative correlation up to a maximum negative for lags 9-12 years. For the 3 locations in southern Norway (panel B), the tendency is the same, with a maximum negative correlation between 9 and 11 years. For Northern Norway and Archangel, the situation is somewhat different: The relations are not as steep as for the North Atlantic stations. 9 Three of the stations (Bodø, Tromsø, and Karasjok) shows minima with 9- 10 years lags, but a station further east, (Vardø, 31E) shows almost equal minima after 3 and ∽10 years lags. Finally Archangel (41E), shows only one minimum after 2-3 years. We interpret this as the North Atlantic climate is dominating in Norway, except for the easternmost station (Vardø) where another climate zone (boreal) appears. This type of climate dominates for Archangel further east. This means that if we calculate temperature averages for stations from one geographical area, we may mix climate zones, and for hemispherical or global temperatures, we may have a mixture of different time lags and the maximum correlation may therefore not be well defined. Correlations with time lags for area-averaged temperatures are displayed in panel D, where results for Norway, Europe60 and HadCRUT3N series are shown. For Norway, the maximum negative correlation is for 11 years time lag and well defined, while the Europe60 average shows two minima of ∽2 and 10 years time lags, signaling the inclusion of eastern (boreal) climate stations. For this data set the highest correlation is after 2 years, which is mostly inside the same solar cycle. The HadCRUT3N series shows only one shallow minimum at 6 - 12 years time lag – apparently a mix of many time lags. 3.2. Temperature trends The temperature series are analyzed with least square fits to the linear relation y = β x + α, where y is temperature or temperature anomaly (for Europe60 and HadCRUT3N), and x is time or length of sunspot cycles (SCL or PSCL). Results for data sets analyzed are shown in table 1. β1 is the secular temperature trend for temperatures calculated from the average temperature in sunspot cycles including cycle 23 which terminated in 2008. The starting year of the temperature series are given in column 3. βSCL is the trend in the relation between the length of a solar cycle and the temperature in the same cycle. For all temperature series investigated, no trend significantly different from zero on the 2σ level has been found for βSCL . βP SCL is the trend between the length of one solar cycle and the tem- perature in the next cycle. We name this the previous solar cycle length (PSCL) relation, since we investigate the use of the length of a solar cycle as predictor for the temperature in the next. r2 P SCL is the estimated coefficient of determination based on the PSCL model. 10 Table 1. Temperature trends and predictions for solar cycle 24 Place Location 58N,8E 59.5N,5E 62.4N,10E 67.5N,15E 69.7,19E 69.5N,25.5E 70.4N,31E 54.3N,6W 64.5N,41E 62N,7W 65.4,18W 78.2,15.5E 64.1,51W Oksøy Utsira Dombas Bodø Tromsø Karasjok Vardø Norway Armagh Archangel Torshavn Akureyri Svalbard Nuuk Europe60 HadCRUT3N Start yr 1870 1868 1865 1868 1868 1876 1856 β1 100yr−1 0.44±0.17 0.75±0.21 0.95±0.23 0.78±0.20 0.36±0.18 0.59±0.43 0.91±0.18 βSCL yr−1 0.05±0.14 0.03±0.13 -0.01±0.16 -0.07±0.15 -0.06±0.10 -0.11±0.21 -0.16±0.17 βP SCL yr−1 -0.28±0.15 -0.37±0.12 -0.45±0.15 -0.42±0.11 -0.29±0.08 -0.45±0.18 -0.38±0.12 r2 P SCL 0.25 0.45 0.55 0.56 0.56 0.43 0.44 t23 ◦ C 8.4 8.3 2.6 5.5 3.3 -1.1 2.3 t24 ◦ C - 6.9 0.9 3.9 2.3 -2.6 0.8 Conf int. 95% 6.1:7.7 -0.1:1.8 3.2:4.7 1.8:2.8 -3.8:-1.4 -0.1:1.7 1900 0.56±0.36 0.11±0.15 -0.30±0.12 0.42 1.82 0.72 -0.05:1.49 1867 1881 1890 1882 1914 1881 1856 1856 0.44±0.25 1.4 ± 0.3 0.58±0.24 1.16±0.44 1.64 ±1.1 0.7±0.6 0.09±0.13 -0.18±0.24 -0.02±0.12 -0.06±0.25 0.69±0.41 -0.12±0.30 -0.29±0.13 -0.51±0.21 -0.34±0.08 -0.71±0.14 -1.09±0.31 -0.65±0.24 0.62±0.18 0.47±0.09 -0.14±0.12 -0.02±0.09 -0.29±0.10 -0.21±0.06 0.33 0.38 0.67 0.72 0.63 0.41 0.39 0.49 10.1 1.5 7.0 4.2 -4.3 -0.7 0.97 0.49 8.8 -0.5 6.9 2.3 -7.8 -2.3 8.0:9.7 -1.9:0.9 5.5:6.5 1.3:3.3 -9.6:-6.0 -4.0:-0.6 -0.20 -0.38 -0.49:0.10 -0.84:0.09∗ Estimated standard deviations are given. ∗Uncertain because of significant correlations in residuals (see table 2) Usually the degrees of freedom applied in the regression analysis are equal to the number of observations minus the number of parameters used in the modeling. However, since we have investigated the correlation as function of time lag after the middle time of a solar cycle, and found that maximum correlation exist about one sunspot cycle later, the number of degrees of freedom is reduced by one. Our suggested model is rather simple: The air temperature in a sunspot cycle is a linear function of the length of the previous sunspot cycle (PSCL) in short: the t(P SC L)-model. Table 1 shows that for all 16 series examined, except for Oksøy, βP SCL is significant negative on the 95% level on the condition that the regression model applied gives independent residuals. Analysis has been performed on the residuals, which are the differences between the temperature observations and the fitted temperatures. To check possible autocorrelation in the residuals a Durbin-Watson (DW) test (Durbin & Watson, 1950, 1951a,b) has been applied. The results of the DW test are shown in Table 2. On the 5% significance level this test showed no significant autocorrelations in the residuals for 10 of the 16 series. Exceptions were the HadCRUT3N series, where significant autocorrelations were identified, and the Oksøy, Dombas, Bodø, Norway and Archangel series where either significant autocorrelations or no significant autocorrelations were identified (indifferent cases). For each of the 10 series with no autocorrelation in the residuals, the 11 Table 2. Durbin-Watson test on autocorrelations in the model residuals No correlation DW test level 0.05 Significance Degrees DW freedom D(L) D(U) result in residuals Series Oksøy Utsira Dombas Bodø Tromsø Karasjok Vardø 1.27 1.38 1.03 1.14 1.49 1.54 1.37 Norway 1.205 Armagh Archangel Torshavn Akureyri Svalbard Nuuk 1.55 1.24 1.74 1.59 2.15 1.67 10 10 10 10 10 9 11 7 10 10 8 9 6 9 0.971 0.971 0.971 0.971 0.971 0.927 1.010 0.824 0.971 0.927 0.879 0.927 0.763 0.927 1.331 1.331 1.331 1.331 1.331 1.324 1.34 D(L)<DW < D(U) DW > D(U) D(L) < DW < D(U) D(L) < DW < D(U) DW > D(U) DW > D(U) DW > D(U) Indifferent Significant Indifferent Indifferent Significant Significant Significant 1.320 D(L)<DW<D(U) Indifferent 1.331 1.324 1.320 1.324 1.332 1.324 DW > D(U) D(L)<DW<D(U) DW > D(U) DW > D(U) DW < 4− D(U) DW > D(U) Significant Indifferent Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant DW > D(U) 1.340 1.01 11 1.48 Europe60 HadCRUT3N Not significant DW < D(L) 1.340 1.01 11 0.86 The Durbin-Watson lower D(L) and upper bounds D(U) numbers are given in Savin & White (1977). The number of parameters k, is 1 in all cases since the regression constant is excluded. The number of observations in the DW test, is in all cases equal the number of degrees of freedom plus 2. estimated trends are significant different from 0 since the absolute values of the estimated trends are greater than the estimated standard deviation, σ , multiplied by t0.025 (f ) - the 0.025 percentile in the Student distribution with f degrees of freedom. Since the residuals are not autocorrelated, the degrees of freedom for the Student distribution are equal to the number of observations minus 3. As mentioned above one additional degree of freedom is subtracted because of inspection of the data on beforehand. Hence the degrees of freedom vary between 6 and 11, and the 0.025 percentile in the Student distribution varies between 2.20 and 2.45. The number of average temperature observations for Bodø and Dombas is 13. Then t0.025 (10) = 2.23. Table 1 shows that the absolute value of the trend estimate for Bodø is ∼ 3.8σ and for Dombas ∼ 3σ . The 0.025 percentile for the Student distribution with 3 degrees of freedom, t0.025 (3) = 3.18. It is no reason to believe that possible, but not significant autocorrelations in the residuals for Bodø or Dombas will reduce the degrees of freedom from 10 to 3 or less. Hence, the temperature trends for Bodø and Dombas are assumed to be significantly different from 0. For Archangel we find βP SCL/σβP SCL = 2.43 > t0.025 (10) = 2.23. Hence, also the Archangel temperature model is assumed to give significant results on a 95 % significance level. Analysis of the Oksøy series does not give satisfactory results. Hence, because of a possible dependency in the residuals and a significance level lower than for the other series, it is not possible to estimate a 95 % confidence 12 Tromsø: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 3.2 2.6 2.2 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Tromsø : Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 4 3 2 1 trend: -0.07oC/year trend: -0.29oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1868-2010 trend: 0.36oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 3.2 2.6 2.2 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 4 3 2 1 Figure 4: Tromsø, Norway (Coastal city 70N): Lower panel: Annual mean temperatures and mean temperatures in sunspot cycles (dots) with linear trend. The broken line shows temperatures measured so far in SC24. The center two panels show temperatures in sunspot cycles versus SCL (left) or PSCL (right). In the right center panel the 95% confidence interval is indicated with dotted lines. The lower panel shows the forecasted value for SC24 (diamond) with standard deviation error bar. The top panel shows the residuals from the t(P SC L) model, and represents what may be left for other regressors and noise to explain. level for the forecasts in this case. For the average temperature of Norway we get βP SCL/σβP SCL = 2.50 > t0.025 (7) = 2.377, which indicates that this is a significant result on the 95% significance level. The absolute value of the estimated HadCRUT3N temperature trend is ∼ 3.5σ . The number of temperature observations is 14 and the number of degrees of freedom 11. Then t0.025 (11) = 2.20. Even with a reduction of number of freedoms from 11 to 3, the temperature trend will be significant different from 0. However, in this case there is reason to be more careful since significant autocorrelations in the residuals are identified. The regression analysis indicates clearly that the temperatures in the 13 Domba s: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 2 1 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Domba s: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 trend: -0.01oC/year trend: -0.45oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1865-2010 trend: 0.95oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 2 1 3 2 1 0 -1 3 2 1 0 -1 Figure 5: Dombas, Norway (Inland, mountain valley 62N), explanation as in figure 4 PSCL model have significant trends different from 0 for 14 out of the 16 data series. It is also reasons to believe that the trend is significantly different from 0 for the HadCRUT3N temperature, but there is some uncertainty because of significant autocorrelations in the residuals. A 95% confidence interval of the estimated trend is given by respectively subtracting and adding the factor σ × t0.025 (f ) to the estimated trend. This is the 95% confidence interval for the temperature forecasts shown in the last column in table 1. For Oksøy no confidence interval is estimated. The next 14 confidence intervals are considered to be precise, while the last one for HadCRUT3N can be considered to be an approximate 95% confidence interval. We conclude that 15 of our 16 series support the PSCL regression relation. The coefficient of determination (r2) indicates how much of the variance can be attributed to the regressor. Our results show that it varies from 0.25 at Oksøy, at the southern tip of Norway, to 0.72 at Akureyri at the bottom of a large fjord in Northern Iceland. The highest values are found on islands and in northwestern coastal regions of the North Atlantic. Lower values are 14 ) C o ( . p m e T 2 1 0 ) C o ( y l a m o n a e r u t a r e p m e T 2 1 0 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 Norway: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year 1980 2000 2020 Norway: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles trend: 0.11oC/yr trend: -0.30oC/yr 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of the previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1900-2010 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year trend: 0.56oC/100 yr 1980 2000 2020 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 -1 Figure 6: Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. found inland, and distant from the main Atlantic Ocean currents. 3.3. Local temperature series The results for two stations in Norway, one coastal north (Tromsø) and one inland south (Dombas), are shown in figures 4 and 5. For these two locations, and the others investigated and shown as figures 8-18 the βSCL - values are not significantly different from zero. This is demonstrated in the center left panels in the figures, which show the relations between the temperature and length of the same sunspot cycle. On the other hand, significant relations are found between PSCL and temperatures, which are shown in the center right panels. The residuals from the PSCL relations (sorted time wise) shown in the top panels, indicate the variability that remains to be explained either by other regressors or noise. For Tromsø (figure 4) the secular temperature trend before application of the PSCL-model is reduced from β1 = 0.0036◦Cyr−1 to β2 = 0.00096 ± 0.0004◦Cyr−1 , where β2 is the secular trend in the residuals after removal of the sunspot cycle effect (PSCL-model). The coefficient of determination 15 Europe60: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 1 0 -1 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 2020 Europe60: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( y l a m o n a e r u t a r e p m e T 1 0 -1 ) C o ( y l a m o n A e r u t a r e p m e T trend:-0.14oC/year trend: -0.29oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of the previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1856-2010 2 1 0 -1 -2 trend: 0.62oC/100 yr 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 2020 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 2 1 0 -1 -2 Figure 7: Temperature anomaly for 60 stations on land in Europe, mostly located outside large cities. A list of the stations is given in the Appendix, explanation as in figure 4. r2 = 0.56 indicates that more than half of the temperature variations may be attributed to solar activity. For Dombas, situated in a mountain valley in southern Norway, (figure 5) the coefficient of determination is r2 = 0.46, indicating that slightly less than half the temperature variations are related to solar activity as modeled by PSCL. For Utsira, which is a lighthouse on the western coast of Norway (figure 9) r2 = 0.45. The similar results indicate that the Atlantic currents may influence both locations. On the other hand, for Oksøy (see figure 8), a lighthouse on the southern tip of Norway, we found that the PSCL-relation was not significant on the 95% level, and this is reflected in r2 = 0.25, which is the smallest solar contribution for the locations investigated. This location is influenced by different ocean streams that may cancel out the effect. In figures 4-19 are also shown (with diamonds) predicted average tem- peratures for SC24 based on the PSCL-model. Temperatures measured for 2009 and 2010 are shown as broken lines. For many locations the mean an- nual temperatures have decreased in the first years of SC24. In some of the 16 Oksøy: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 8 7 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Oksøy: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 9 8 7 6 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 9 8 7 6 trend: 0.05oC/year trend: -0.28oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1870-2010 trend: 0.44oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 9 8 7 6 8 7 9 8 7 6 Figure 8: Oksøy lighthouse, Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. The confidence interval indicated in the center right panel is probably less than 95% in this case. figures yearly observations done before the first SC included in the analyses are connected with broken lines. The average solar (PSCL) contribution to the variability for the 4 north- ern Norwegian stations in table 1 is 50%, compared to 42% for the 3 stations located in southern Norway. Moving further west and north, we find that the stations at Torshavn, Akureyri and Svalbard (figures 15-17), have the maximum solar contribution with r2 = 0.63 − 0.72. For Archangel (figure 13) we get βP SCL = −0.51 ± 0.21, which is in line with the result of Archibald (2010) who got β = −0.6, based on PSCL calcu- lated from both the time between maxima and between minima. Archangel displayed the highest correlation with a time lag of only 2 years (figure 3). This may indicate a boreal climate different from the Atlantic, because of the shorter reaction time to a solar pulse. For Armagh (figure 14) we get βP SCL = −0.29 ± 0.13, which is smaller than the value β = −0.5 determined by Butler & Johnston (1994). Their 17 Utsira: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 8 7 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Utsira: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 9 8 7 6 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 9 8 7 6 trend: 0.02oC/year trend: -0.37oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1868-2010 trend: 0.75oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 9 8 7 6 8 7 9 8 7 6 Figure 9: Utsira lighthouse, Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 18 Bodø: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 5 4 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Bodø : Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 6 5 4 3 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 6 5 4 3 trend: -0.07oC/year trend: -0.29oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1868-2010 trend: 0.78oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 6 5 4 3 5 4 6 5 4 3 Figure 10: Bodø, Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 19 Karasjok: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T -1 -2 -3 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Karasjok: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T -1 -2 -3 -4 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 0 -2 -4 trend: -0.11oC/year trend: -0.45oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1876-2010 trend: 0.59oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year -1 -2 -3 -1 -2 -3 -4 0 -2 -4 Figure 11: Karasjok, Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. larger value may come from their smaller range in SCL values due to the 1-2-2-2-1 smoothing applied by them. The secular trend is determined with least significance for Svalbard (78N), which also has the largest trend, due to Arctic amplification. The Svalbard temperature record is based on measurements at the coast of the large fjord Isfjorden, and the temperature is therefore affected by both regional and local sea ice conditions. It is somewhat surprising that the coefficient of determi- nation r2 = 0.63, which indicates that solar activity plays an important role for this Arctic location far North of the Polar Circle. The series for Svalbard is also much shorter than the other series, but is still the longest in the high Arctic. The temperature measured at Svalbard has already shown sign of decline as predicted. A more detailed analysis of the Svalbard temperature series has been per- formed by Solheim et al. (2012), who repeated this analysis with weighted averages and also analyzed each season separately. They confirmed the val- ues of the correlation coefficient r with a bootstrap analysis, and got similar results as reported here for the coefficient of determination r2 . Only the 20 Vardø: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 2 1 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 2020 Vardø: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 trend: -0.16oC/year trend: -0.38oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1856-2010 trend: 0.91oC/100 yr 2 1 3 2 1 0 -1 3 2 1 0 -1 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 2020 Figure 12: Vardø, Norway, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. yearly average and the winter season (DJF) temperatures showed no auto- correlations in the residuals. The winter temperatures gave r2 = 0.67, which indicates that the solar influence takes place also when the Sun is completely under the horizon. Indirect lagged contributions by means of the ocean cur- rent and warm air advected from the south are the only possible explanations for the correlations determined. For Nuuk on Greenland (figure 18), the secular trend (β1) is not signifi- cant, and disappears almost completely (β2 = 0.0006 ± 0.0002◦Cyr−1 ) when corrected for solar activity. The Nuuk station is located near the coast in West Greenland, and is affected by regional sea surface temperatures. The sea between the Labrador island and West Greenland has shown a marked warm anomaly for most of 2010. This has resulted in a temperature increase the last two years (figure 18), opposite the prediction in table 1. 3.4. Area averaged air temperature series The yearly average temperature for Norway calculated from 1900 on- wards, is shown in the bottom panel of figure 6. A significant relation with 21 Archangel: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 1 0 -1 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Archangel: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 2 1 0 -1 -2 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 trend: -0.18oC/year trend: -0.51oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1881-2010 trend: 1.4oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 1 0 -1 2 1 0 -1 -2 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 Figure 13: Archangel, Russia, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 22 Armagh: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 10 9 8 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Armagh: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( 10 e r u t a r e p m e T 9 8 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 10 9 8 7 trend: 0.09oC/year trend: -0.29oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1867-2010 trend: 0.44oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 10 9 8 10 9 8 10 9 8 7 Figure 14: Armagh, Northern Ireland, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 23 Torshavn: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 7 6 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year 1980 2000 2020 Torshavn: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles trend: -0.02oC/year trend: -0.34oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1890-2008 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 7 6 5 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 8 7 6 5 7 6 5 7 6 8 7 6 5 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year trend: 0.58oC/100 yr 1980 2000 2020 Figure 15: Torshavn, Faroe Islands, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 24 Akureyri: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 4 3 2 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Akureyri: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 5 4 3 2 1 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 5 4 3 2 1 0 trend: -0.06oC/year trend: -0.71oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1882-2010 trend: 1.16oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 5 4 3 2 1 0 Figure 16: Akureyri, Iceland, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 25 Svalbard: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T -5 -6 -7 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year 1980 2000 2020 Svalbard: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T -4 6 -8 -10 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 trend: 0.67oC/year trend: -1.09oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1914-2010 trend: 1.6oC/100 yr 1900 1920 1940 1960 Year 1980 2000 2020 -5 -6 -7 -4 6 -8 -10 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 Figure 17: Svalbard (Longyearbyen), average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 26 Nuuk: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 0 -1 -2 -3 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year Nuuk: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 0 -1 -2 -3 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 2 0 -2 -4 trend: -0.12oC/year trend: -0.62oC/year 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1881-2010 trend: 0.7oC/100 yr 1860 1880 1900 1920 1960 1980 2000 2020 1940 Year 0 -1 -2 -3 0 -1 -2 -3 2 0 -2 -4 Figure 18: Nuuk, Greenland, average yearly temperatures, explanation as in figure 4. 27 HadCRUT3N: Temperature corrected for sunspot cycle length effect ) C o ( . p m e T 0.6 0.2 -0.2 -0.6 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year 1960 1980 2000 2020 HadCRUT3N: Mean temperatures in sunspot cycles trend: -0.02oC/yr trend: -0.21oC/yr 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of sunspot cycle 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 Length of the previous cycle Yearly mean temperatures 1850-2010 ) C o ( y l a m o n a e r u t a r e p m e T 0.5 0 -0.5 -1.0 ) C o ( e r u t a r e p m e T 0.8 0.4 0 -0.4 -0.8 0.6 0.2 -0.2 -0.6 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 0.8 0.4 0 -0.4 -0.8 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 Year trend: 0.47oC/100 yr 1960 1980 2000 2020 Figure 19: HadCRUT3N, average yearly temperature anomalies, explanation as in figure 4. βP SCL = −0.30 ± 0.12 reduces the secular trend with a large fraction to β2 = 0.0020 ± 0.0002◦Cyr−1 . Solar activity may contribute at least 42%. For the average temperature for 60 European stations, mostly located outside big cities, we find a significant relation with βP SCL = −0.29 ± 0.10 (figure 7) and r2 = 0.39. HadCRUT3N temperature anomalies gives βP SCL = −0.21 ± 0.06, and r2 = 0.49, but in this case also other regressors may contribute significantly. As seen in figures 6 and 7, the Norwegian and Europe60 average tem- peratures have already started to decline towards the predicted SC24 values, while the HadCRUT3N temperature anomaly has shown no such decline yet (figure 19). 3.5. Testing the PSCL-model forecast To check the robustness of the forecast with the PSCL-model we have for all 16 datasets removed the last entry, which is the SC23 temperature, and used the remaining observations for generating a forecast of t(SC23). 28 The result is that the forecast for 11 of the 15 series with 95% confidence intervals are within this interval. For 3 of the series (Dombas, Svalbard and HadCRUT3N, the forecasted temperature is 0.1◦C above the forecasted range, and in the case of Bodø, the deviation is 0.2◦C. If the SC23 had been a fraction shorter, all observed values would be inside the 95% range. It should be remarked that SC22 for a long time was listed in NGDC (2011) with a length of 9.6 or 9.7 yr, which was used in other analysis (Archibald, 2008; Thejll, 2009). According to earlier lists (Thejll, 2009) May 1996, which is the mathematical minimum for SC93, was in the beginning used, while a consensus among solar scientists moved the minimum to September 1996, which made SC22 longer (10.0 yr) and SC23 shorter (12.2 yr). This difference in definition of SCL from the original by Waldmeier (1939) may explain the observations outside the confidence range. 4. Discussion The correlations found between the average temperature in a solar cycle and the length of the previous cycle, indicates a possible relation between solar activity and surface air temperature for the locations and areas inves- tigated. The weak or non significant, correlations between the temperature and length of the same cycle, and the much stronger correlations for time lags of the order 10-12 years, makes the length of a solar cycle a good predictor for the average temperature in the next cycle. The smoothing filters 1-2-2-2-1 and 1-2-1 or a length jump (sudden in- crease of the SCL), may be the reason that the previous good correlations between solar cycle length and Northern hemisphere land-temperature dis- appeared after 2000 (Thejll & Lassen, 2000; Thejll, 2009). We expect that the optimum delay is not exactly one solar cycle at some locations on the Earth, presumably due to oceanographic effects. This is confirmed by our determination of the correlations between SCL and tem- perature lags which appears to be at a maximum negative value for 10-12 year lags around the North Atlantic, but shorter at eastern locations as Vardø on the Barents sea and Archangel in Northern Russia (figure 3). Variations in temperature lags may not give precisely one solar cycle lag as the optimum relations between area averaged temperatures and SCL, but both for the Europe60 station average and HadCRUT N acceptable correla- tions are found with PSCL - and reasonable good predictions are possible. 29 The PSCL-model predicts a temperature drop of 1.3 to 1.7◦C for single Norwegian stations analyzed from SC23 to SC24. For the average Norwegian and Europa60 temperatures the temperature drop from SC23 to SC24 is 1.1-1.2 ◦C. For HadCRUT3N the predicted temperature drop is 0.9◦C. 95% confidence intervals for the predicted temperatures in SC24 are given in table 1, last column. The Arctic cooling as predicted here may be converted into a global cooling, which is a factor 2-3 lower due to the Artic amplification of temperature differences (Moritz et al., 2002). Tnis means a global cooling of the order 0.3-0.5◦C. We may also expect a more direct cooling near Equator due to the response to reduced TSI with the weaker solar cycles in the near future (Perry, 2007; Mehl et al., 2009; Richards et al., 2009). The PSCL relation is determined for the period 1850-2008 when the PSCL on average has shortened from cycle to cycle in relative small steps. and the Earth has warmed. The large increase in SCL from SC22 to SC23 signals a temperature drop, which may not come as fast as predicted because of the thermal inertia of the oceans. The warming has taken place over 150 years - cooling of the same order may require some decades to be realized. The temperatures in the North Atlantic and on adjacent land areas are controlled by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), which has in the instrumental period from 1856 exhibited a 65-80 yr cycle (0.4◦C range), with warm phases at roughly 1860-1880 and 1930-1960 and cool phases dur- ing 1905-1925 and 1970-1990 (Kerr, 2000; Gray et al., 2004). This period is proposed related to a 74 yr period, which is a sub harmonic of the 18.6 yrs lunar-nodal-tide (Yndestad et al., 2008). The AMO may affect the tem- peratures at the locations we have analyzed, but a preliminary investigation by the authors have found considerable variations in dominant periods from place to place, which we interpret as due to local variations related to ge- ography, dominant weather patterns, and distance from the ocean currents. Inclusion of periodic variations may improve the forecasts, and we plan to investigate this further. The coefficient of determination r2 is a measure of the relative contribu- tion of solar activity modeled by the PSCL-model, to the temperature varia- tions. The range of r2 is from 0.25 (Oksøy) to 0.72 (Akureyri). The highest values (Torshavn: 0.62, Akureyri: 0.72 and Svalbard: 0.63) are found in or close to the North Atlantic ocean currents. This points to ocean currents as the mechanism of transport of the heat generated at southern locations by solar radiation. Even if the correlation is rather high between the actual temperature and 30 the fitted temperature by use of regression modeling, the question arises of possibilities to improve the models. Other regressors, which may be included, are atmospheric and oceanic dynamics unrelated to the Sun or with different time lags, volcanic activity, GHG forcing, and anthropogenic activity of var- ious kinds. The contribution from other regressors should be determined for each location, and may be quite different from area-averaged regressors. This is a question left for future investigations. However, there are clear limita- tions for including additional explanatory variables simply because there are limited numbers of observations available. Additional variables will improve the model fitting, but reduce the degree of freedom. This analysis shows significant dependency between the previous sunspot cycle length and the temperature. The established model is able to make significant forecasts with 95% confidence limits for the present sunspot cycle. There are reasons to believe that these results could be fundamental in further development of long-term forecasting models for the temperature. Looking at figure 1, which shows the variation in the length of solar cycles, we realize that short cycles like the one that ended in 1996, have only been observed 3 times in 300 years. After the shortest cycles, sudden changes too much longer cycles have always taken place, and thereafter there is a slow shortening of the next cycles, which take many cycles to reach a new minimum. This recurrent pattern tells us that we can expect several long cycles in the next decades. Analysis of the SCL back to 1600 has shown a periodic behavior with period 188 yr, now entering a phase with increasing SCL the next ∼75 yr (Richards et al., 2009). de Jager & Duhau (2011) concludes that the solar activity is presently going through a brief transition period (2000-2014), which will be followed by a Grand Minimum of the Maunder type, most probably starting in the twenties of the present century. Another prediction, based on reduced solar irradiance due to reduced solar radius, is a series of lower solar activity cycles leading to a Maunder like minimum starting around 2040 (Abdussamatov, 2007). A physical explanation for the correlations between solar activity parame- ters as the SCL and the temperatures on the Earth, and a possible decoupling of this relation the last few years has been investigated by Solanki & Krivova (2003). Their conclusion is that even if the proxies and direct measure- ments are scaled such that statistically the solar contribution to climate is as large as possible in the period 1856-1970, the Sun cannot have contributed to more than 30% of the global temperature increase taken place since then, 31 irrespective of which of the three considered channels is the dominant one de- termining Sun-climate interactions: Tropospheric heating caused by changes in total solar irradiance, stratospheric chemistry influenced by changes in the solar UV spectrum, or cloud coverage affected by the cosmic ray flux. From correlation studies of 7 (not all global) temperature series for the period 1610-1970 de Jager et al. (2010) found a solar contribution of 41% to the secular temperature increase. Our results are somewhat higher for Northern Hemisphere locations in the period 1850-2008. Analyzing global temperature curves for periodic oscillations Scafetta (2010) concludes that the climate is forced by astronomical oscillations re- lated to the Sun, and at least 60% of the warming since 1970 can be related to astronomical oscillations. Looking at our figures 4-19, we can see sign of quasi-periodic variations in the lower panels, which have more or less disap- peared in the upper panels. We may therefore suggest that SCL in some way is related to astronomical forcing. Satellite observations by the Spectral Imager Monitor (SIM) indicate that variations in solar ultraviolet radiation may be larger than previously thought, and in particular, much lower during the recent long solar minimum. Based on these observations Ineson et al. (2011) have driven an ocean-climate model with UV irradiance. They demonstrate the existence of a solar climate signal that affects the NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation) and produced the three last cold winters in Northern Europe and in the United States. 5. Conclusions Significant linear relations are found between the average air temperature in a solar cycle and the length of the previous solar cycle (PSCL) for 12 out of 13 meteorological stations in Norway and in the North Atlantic. For 9 of these stations no autocorrelation on the 5% significance level was found in the residuals. For 4 stations the autocorrelation test was undetermined, but the significance of the PSCL relations allowed for 95% confidence level in forecasting for 3 of these stations. Significant relations are also found for temperatures averaged for Norway, 60 European stations temperature anomaly, and for the HadCRUT3N temperature anomaly. Temperatures for Norway and the average of 60 European stations showed indifferent or no autocorrelations in the residuals. The HadCRUT3N series showed significant autocorrelations in the residuals. 32 For the average temperatures of Norway and the 60 European stations, the solar contribution to the temperature variations in the period investigated is of the order 40%. An even higher contribution (63-72%) is found for stations at Faroe Islands, Iceland and Svalbard. This is higher than the 7% attributed to the Sun for the global temperature rise in AR4 (IPCC, 2007). About 50% of the HadCRUT3N temperature variations since 1850 may be attributed solar activity. However, this conclusion is more uncertain because of the strong autocorrelations found in the residuals. The significant linear relations indicate a connection between solar activ- ity and temperature variations for the locations and areas investigated. A regression forecast model based on the relation between PSCL and the aver- age air tempereaure is used to forecast the temperature in the newly started solar cycle 24. This forecast model benefits, as opposed to the ma jority of other regression models with explanatory variables, to use an explanatory variable - the solar cycle length - nearly without uncrtainty. Usually the ex- planatory variables have to be forecasted, which of cause induce significant additional forecasting uncertainties. Our forecast indicates an annual average temperature drop of 0.9◦C in the Northern Hemisphere during solar cycle 24. For the measuring stations south of 75N, the temperature decline is of the order 1.0-1.8◦C and may already have already started. For Svalbard a temperature decline of 3.5◦C is forecasted in solar cycle 24 for the yearly average temperature. An even higher temperature drop is forecasted in the winter months (Solheim et al., 2012). Artic amplification due to feedbacks because of changes in snow and ice cover has increased the temperature north of 70N a factor 3 more than below 60N (Moritz et al., 2002). An Artic cooling may relate to a global cooling in the same way, resulting in a smaller global cooling, about 0.3-0.5 ◦C in SC24. Our study has concentrated on an effect with lag once solar cycle in order to make a model for prediction. Since solar forcing on climate is present on many timescales, we do not claim that our result gives a complete picture of the Sun’s forcing on our planet’s climate. Acknow ledgments A special thank to D. Archibald for valuable comments, and to the various agencies for providing data for analysis: Hadley Centre, Norwegian Meteoro- logical Institute (e-Klima portal), www.rimfrost.no, and the GISS data base 33 for the European stations, using the criterion ”after combining sources at the same location”, in addition to Ø. Nordli for providing the homogenized Dombas series. Finally we thank two referees for valuable comments, which have helped us improve the work significantly in two referee-cycles. 34 References Abdusamatov, K.I. 2007, Optimal Prediction of the Peaks of Several Suc- ceding Cycles on the Basis of Long-Term Variations in the Solar Radius or Solar Constant, Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 23,9 7-100 Archibald D. 2008, Solar Cycle 24: Implications for the United States, Inter- national Conference on Climate Change, /www.davidarchibald.info/ Archibald D. 2010, Book: Past and Future of Climate, ISBN 978-0-646- 53605-7 Bond, G., et al. 2001, Persistent Solar Influence on North Atlantic Cli- mate During the Holocene, Science 294, 2130-2136, DOI: 10.1126/sci- ence.1065680 Butler, C. J. 1994, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures at Armagh Ob- servatory, 1844-1992, and the Length of the Sunspot Cycle, Solar Physics 152, 35-42 Butler, C. J. and Johnston 1994, The link between the Solar Dynamo and Climate - the Evidence from a Long Mean Air Temperature Series from Northern Ireland, Irish Journal of Astronomy, 21, 251-254 Butler, C. J. and Johnston D. J. 1996, A Provisional Long Mean Air Tem- perature Series for Armagh Observatory, JASTP,58,1657-1682 de Jager, C. and Duhau, S. 2011, The variable solar dynamo and the forecast of solar activity; influence on terrestrial surface temperature, in Global Warming in the 21th Century, J. M. Cossia (ed), Nova Science Publ. N.Y., pp. 77-106 de Jager, C., Duhau, S. & van Geel, B. 2010, Quantifying and specifying the solar influence on terrestrial surface temperature, JASTP, 72, 926-937 Dicke, R.H., 1978, Is there a chronometer hidden deep in the Sun? Nature, 276, no 5689, 470-481 Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. 1950, Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I, Biometrika 37, 409-428 35 Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. 1951a, Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II, Biometrika 38, 159-178 Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. 1951b, Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. III, Biometrika 58, 1-19 Friis-Christensen, E. and Lassen, K. 1991, Length of the Solar Cycle: An indicator of Solar Activity Closely Associated with Climate, Science, New Series, 254, 698-700 Friis-Christensen, E. and Lassen, K. 1992, Danish Meteorological Institute Science Report 92-3 Gordon, A.L, 1986, ”Interocean Exchange of Thermocline Water”, JGR, 91, 5037. Gray, 2010, al. et L.J., DOI:10.1029/2009RG000282. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4001, Gray, S.T, Graumlich, L.J., Betancourt, J.L, & Pederson, G.T. 2004, Geo- physical Research Letters, 31, L12205, DOI:10.1029/2004GL019932 Ineson, S., Scaufe, A.A, Knight, J.R. et al. 2011, Nature Geoscience, DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1282 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmenta Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon et al., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K. Hoyt, D.V. and Schatten, H.K. 1993, A Discussion of Plausible Solar Irradi- ance Variations, 1700-1992, JGR, 98, 18,895-18,906 Kerr, R.A 2000, A North Atlantic Climate Pacemaker for the Centuries, Science, 288, 1984-1985, DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5473.1984 Lassen, K. and Friis-Christensen, E. 1995, Variability of the solar cycle length during the past five centuries and the apparent association with terrestrial climate, JATP, 57, 835-845 36 Moritz R.E., Bitz, C.M., and Steig E.J. 2002, Dynamics of Recent Climate Change in the Arctic, Polar Science, 297, 1497-1501 Mehl, G.A., Arblaster, J.M., Matthes, K., Sassi, F., van Loon, H. 2009, Amplifying the Pacific Climate System response to a Small 11-Year Solar Cycle Forcing, Science, 325, 1114-1118; DOI:1126/science.1172872 NGDC solar data 2011 at ftp://ftp.ngdc.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/ INTERNATIONAL/maxmin/MAXMIN Perry, C.A. 2007, ”Evidence for a physical linkage between galactic cosmic rays and regional climate time series”, Advances in Space Research, 40, 353-364; doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.079 Richards, M.T., Rogers, M.L., Richards, D.St. P., 2009, Long-term Variabil- ity in the Length of the Solar Cycle, PASP, 121, 797-809 Reichel, R., Thejll, P., Lassen, K. 2001, The cause-and-effect relationship of solar cycle length and the Northern Hemisphere air surface temperature, JGR,106, Issue A8, 15,635-15,641 45, Econometrika, 1977, K.J. and White, E. N. Savin, /www.eco.uc3m.es/∽ricmora/ECII/materials/Durbin_Watson_tables.pdf Scafetta, N. 2010, JASTP, 72, 951, DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.04.015 Solanki, S. K. and Krivova, N. A. 2003, Can solar variability explain global warming since 1970?, JGR, 108, A5, SSH 7-1, CiteID 1200; DOI:10.1029/2002JA009753,396, 1029 Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., Schssler, M., and Fligge, M. 2002, Search for a relationship between solar cycle amplitude and length, A& A 396, 1029-1035; DOI:10.1051/0004-6361:20021436 Solheim, J.-E., Stordahl, K. and Humlum, O. 2012 Solar Activity and Sval- bard Temperatures, Advances in Meteorology, DOI:10.1155/2012/543146, 8 pages Thejll,P. and Lassen, K. 2000, Solar forcing of the Northern hemisphere land air temperature: New data, JASTP, 62, 1207-1213 37 Thejll, P. 2009, Update of the Solar Cycle Length curve, and the relationship to the global mean temperature, Danish Climate Centre Report 09-01 Yndestad, H., Turell, W. R., Ozhigin, V. 2008, Lunar nodal tide ef- fects on variability of sea level, temperature, and salinity in the Faroe- Shetland Channel and the Barents Sea, Deep-Sea Research I (2008), DOI:10.1016/j.dsr.2008.06.003 Waldmeier, M. 1939. Die zonenwanderung der sonnenflecken, Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidenssischen Sternwarte Zrich, vol. 14, no. 138, Wilson, R.M. 1998, Evidence for solar-cycle forcing and secular variation in the Armagh Observatory temperature record (1844-1992), JGR, 103 (D10), 11,159-11,171 Zhou, K. and Butler, C. J. 1998, A statistical study of the relationship be- tween he solar cycle length and tree-ring index values, JASTP, 60, 1711- 1718 38 Appendix A. The Europe60 stations Table 3. Location of Meteorological stations included Stornoway 22.5 E 68.5 N 40.7 E 64.5 N Arhangel’Sk Karesuando Stuttgart 34.8 E 65.0 N 19.0 W Kem’-Port 74.5 N Bjørnøya Tafjord 14.1 E 48.0 N 14.4 E 67.3 N Bodø Kremsmuenster Brest 48.5 N 4.4 W København 55.7 N 12.6 E Tiree 1.2 W Torshavn 60.1 N Lerwick 10.6 E 51.8 N Brocken Tot’Ma 20.2 E 49.2 N 5.2 E 52.1 N De Bilt Lomnicky Stit Trier-Petrisb 23.9 E 49.8 N 6.2 W L’Viv 53.4 N Dublin Airport Tromsø 3.6 E 44.1 N Mont Aigoual 41.8 E 55.0 N Elat’Ma 33.0E 69.0 N Murmansk 19.4 E 54.2 N Elblag Uppsala 4.0 W Utsira 40.8 N Navacerrada 12.9 E 50.4 N Fichtelberg Goteborg-Save 57.8 N 11.9 E Oktjabr’Skij 51.6 N 45.5 E Valentia Obs. Vardø 38.1 E 63.9 N Onega 34.8 E 65.9 N Gridino Vf. Omu 18.2 E 46.0 N Pecs 24.1 E 65.8 N Haparanda Vilnius 14.2 E 50.1 N Praha-Ruzyne 25.0 E 60.3 N Helsinki-Seutula Visby Airport 30.8 E 63.8 N Reboly 11.0 E 47.8 N Hohenpeissenb Vologda 11.2 E 62.3 N Røros 8.7W 70.9 N Jan Mayen 9.3 E 47.2 N Saentis 8.0 E 46.5 N Jungfraujoch Vytegra Kandalaksa 67.2 N 32.4 E Ship M 66.0 N 2.0 E Wlodawa Zugspitze 26.6 E 67.4 N Sodankyla 43.3 E 68.7 N Kanin Nos Karasjok 69.5 N 25.50 E Stockholm 59.3 N 18.1 E Zurich 58.2 N 48.8 N 62.2 N 56.5 N 62.0 N 59.9 N 49.8 N 69.5 N 59.9 N 59.3 N 51.9 N 70.4 N 45.5 N 54.6 N 57.7 N 59.3 N 61.0 N 51.5 N 47.4 N 47.4 N 6.3 W 9.2 E 7.4 E 6.9 W 6.8 W 42.8 E 6.7 E 19.0 E 17.6 E 4.9 E 10.2 W 31.1 E 25.4 E 25.1 E 18.4 E 39.9 E 36.5 E 23.5 E 11.0 E 8.6 E Figure A.20: The location of the Europe60 stations 39 Europe60: No of stations 60 50 40 30 20 10 o N 0 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year Figure A.21: The variation in numbers of stations in the Europe60 average 40
1811.02108	2	1811	2019-04-08T18:11:20	Detecting Unresolved Binaries in TESS Data with Speckle Imaging	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is conducting a two-year wide-field survey searching for transiting exoplanets around nearby bright stars that will be ideal for follow-up characterization. To facilitate studies of planet compositions and atmospheric properties, accurate and precise planetary radii need to be derived from the transit light curves. Since 40 - 50% of exoplanet host stars are in multiple star systems, however, the observed transit depth may be diluted by the flux of a companion star, causing the radius of the planet to be underestimated. High angular resolution imaging can detect companion stars that are not resolved in the TESS Input Catalog, or by seeing-limited photometry, to validate exoplanet candidates and derive accurate planetary radii. We examine the population of stellar companions that will be detectable around TESS planet candidate host stars, and those that will remain undetected, by applying the detection limits of speckle imaging to the simulated host star populations of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018). By detecting companions with contrasts of delta m < 7 - 9 and separations of ~0.02 - 1.2'', speckle imaging can detect companion stars as faint as early M stars around A - F stars and stars as faint as mid-M around G - M stars, as well as up to 99% of the expected binary star distribution for systems located within a few hundred parsecs.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version April 10, 2019 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 DETECTING UNRESOLVED BINARIES IN TESS DATA WITH SPECKLE IMAGING Rachel A. Matson,1 Steve B. Howell,1 and David Ciardi2 1NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 2Caltech/IPAC - NASA Exoplanet Science Institute 1200 E. California Ave, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA (Received; Revised; Accepted) Submitted to ABSTRACT The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is conducting a two-year wide-field survey searching for transiting exoplanets around nearby bright stars that will be ideal for follow-up characterization. To facilitate studies of planet compositions and atmospheric properties, accurate and precise planetary radii need to be derived from the transit light curves. Since 40 − 50% of exoplanet host stars are in multiple star systems, however, the observed transit depth may be diluted by the flux of a companion star, causing the radius of the planet to be underestimated. High angular resolution imaging can detect companion stars that are not resolved in the TESS Input Catalog, or by seeing-limited photometry, to validate exoplanet candidates and derive accurate planetary radii. We examine the population of stellar companions that will be detectable around TESS planet candidate host stars, and those that will remain undetected, by applying the detection limits of speckle imaging to the simulated host star populations of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018). By detecting companions with contrasts of ∆m (cid:46) 7− 9 and separations of ∼ 0.02− 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, speckle imaging can detect companion stars as faint as early M stars around A−F stars and stars as faint as mid-M around G−M stars, as well as up to 99% of the expected binary star distribution for systems located within a few hundred parsecs. Keywords: binaries: general, binaries: visual, planetary systems, techniques: high angular resolution 9 1 0 2 r p A 8 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 8 0 1 2 0 . 1 1 8 1 : v i X r a Corresponding author: Rachel Matson [email protected] 2 Matson et al. 1. INTRODUCTION Building on the success of NASA's Kepler Mission, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is an all-sky survey designed to find close-in transiting planets orbiting the nearest stars, with an emphasis on detecting small planets orbiting bright stars (Ricker et al. 2015). The planets discovered by TESS will be well suited for follow- up observations and atmospheric characterization via ground-based facilities and missions such as the Hubble Space Telescope and James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). However, the thousands of planet candidates detected by TESS will require substantial follow-up efforts in order to confirm their planetary status and identify the planets most suitable for atmospheric characterization (Kempton et al. 2018). Planets discovered with photometric surveys provide a wealth of information via their light curves but require additional confirmation as other astrophysical phenomena can mimic the signal of a transiting planet. For instance, eclipsing binaries with grazing eclipses or whose light is blended with a candidate host star can have eclipses that resemble planetary transits (Fressin et al. 2013). Follow-up observations are therefore necessary to confirm or validate transiting planets, as false positives typically outnumber true planetary systems (Torres et al. 2011). High-resolution spectroscopy, in particular, can rule out close binary companions and measure the mass of a planet. However, for faint targets (V (cid:38) 12) and the sheer number of planetary candidates found by space missions like Kepler and TESS, spectroscopic confirmation of every planet becomes impossible. Alternatively, high-resolution imaging is used to detect additional stars within the photometric aperture that may be responsible for the observed transit or dilute a stellar eclipse so that it mimics a planetary transit (Everett et al. 2015). Statistical validation techniques are then used to asses the relative probabilities of planetary and false positive scenarios for a planet candidate, determining whether it is more likely to be a transiting planet or a false positive (e.g. Torres et al. 2011; Morton 2012). High-resolution imaging therefore rules out various false positive scenarios and enables robust validation of planet candidates. Such follow-up will be especially important for TESS as the ∼21(cid:48)(cid:48) pixels will often include multiple stars, increasing the risk of blends and false positives. While TESS is targeting nearby, bright stars and many of the detected exoplanets will be amenable to mass measurements through precision radial velocities, detecting contaminating stars will be vital for confirming the planetary nature of transit events and validating the thousands of planet candidates, including low mass and more distant planets. Once a planet candidate is confirmed or validated, if the host star is single and isolated, the radius of the planet can be obtained from a simple fit to the transit light curve. Accurate and precise planet radii are invaluable for determining planetary distributions as well as addressing fundamental questions concerning the bulk compositions, atmospheric properties, and formation histories of exoplanets (Madhusudhan et al. 2014). Planet mass and radius determinations allow for calculations of the bulk planet density, which constrains the interior composition of the planet. Incident flux, and therefore planetary equilibrium temperatures, also depend on planetary radii (Johnson et al. 2017) and models of transiting Earth-sized planets have shown that the bulk composition of a planet strongly affects the resulting thermal emission and transmission spectra (Morley et al. 2017). Thus, in order to interpret the atmospheric signatures observed via transit and emission spectroscopy, accurate knowledge of the planetary radii are required. If a host star is not isolated, however, the observed transit depth will be diluted by the flux of the companion star, causing the radius of the planet to be underestimated (Ciardi et al. 2015). Both bound and line-of-sight companion stars can contaminate the light curve and affect the measured planetary radii. Furlan et al. (2017) found that ∼ 30% of Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) observed with high-resolution imaging had at least one companion detected within 4(cid:48)(cid:48) (pixel scale of Kepler). In reality the true number of KOI companion stars is larger due to the varying sensitivity limits of the imaging techniques. Several studies of stellar multiplicity in Kepler and K2 exoplanet host stars have found companion fractions of 40 − 50% (e.g. Horch et al. 2014; Deacon et al. 2016; Matson et al. 2018; Ziegler et al. 2018a), consistent with solar-type stars in the solar neighborhood (Raghavan et al. 2010). While other studies find fewer close binary companions around Kepler exoplanet host stars (Wang et al. 2014a,b; Kraus et al. 2016), planet hosting stars, in general, appear to follow similar binary trends as field stars. We therefore expect comparable fractions of unresolved binaries and blended companions in TESS data, with the larger pixel scale potentially increasing the number of blended companions. Without properly accounting for the presence of stellar companions within the photometric aperture of TESS, planet sizes will be underestimated, potentially affecting both the density and surface gravity derived for the planet as well as the interpretation of atmospheric signatures. Such unresolved binaries also give rise to systematic errors in star and planet counts, which lead to biases in planet occurrence rates. In particular, the occurrence rates of planets with radii less than ∼2R⊕ may be underestimated by as much as 50% (Bouma et al. 2018), a key regime for understanding the formation and evolution of rocky super-Earths Speckle Imaging TESS data 3 and sub-Neptunes with thick atmospheric envelopes (Fulton et al. 2017; Owen & Wu 2017). High-resolution imaging of TESS exoplanet candidates therefore plays a vital role in detecting stellar companions and correcting planetary radii, necessary for deriving unbiased planet occurrence rates, bulk compositions of planets, and performing atmospheric characterization. Seeing-limited images from ground-based, wide-field surveys, such as 2MASS or SDSS, can reveal stellar companions at near-equal contrast ratios within ∼ 3(cid:48)(cid:48) of exoplanet host stars (Ziegler et al. 2017), making them useful for identifying blended stars within the TESS pixels and ruling out nearby eclipsing binaries as the source of any transits. However, higher resolution imaging using adaptive optics, speckle, or lucky imaging is required to identify close companions and provide more precise confirmation and characterization of planetary systems. Speckle imaging, in particular, can detect companions around exoplanet host stars within (cid:46) 0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 and up to ∼10 magnitudes fainter than the host star (Howell et al. 2011; Horch et al. 2012b). Detecting companions in this region is especially important as studies of Kepler stars have shown that most companions within 1(cid:48)(cid:48) are bound, while only ∼50% of companions at 2(cid:48)(cid:48) are bound (Horch et al. 2014; Hirsch et al. 2017; Matson et al. 2018; Ziegler et al. 2018a). As bound companions are closer to the host star, and tend to be roughly equal in brightness, they are more likely to dilute exoplanet transits and affect planetary radii (Furlan & Howell 2017). In addition, nearly all TESS targets will be brighter and closer than the stars observed by Kepler, increasing the effectiveness of high-resolution imaging. Instead of probing within ∼100 AU of the host stars, high-resolution imaging will be able to detect companion stars within ∼1− 10 AU of the host stars, thereby decreasing the fraction of undetected companions (Ciardi et al. 2015). The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the importance of high-resolution follow-up imaging for TESS planet candidate host stars, which are nearly ten times closer than Kepler host stars, by identifying the parameter space in which speckle imaging can find unresolved stellar companions to aid in planet validation and characterization efforts. We begin by briefly discussing the capabilities of our speckle instruments and our follow up efforts for Kepler and K2 in Section 2. In Section 3, we use the detection limits of speckle imaging to identify possible companions that can be detected around exoplanet host stars from the TESS planet yield simulations of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018). Finally, the fraction of stellar companions we expect to detect for TESS exoplanet hosts as well as the role of speckle imaging in TESS follow-up efforts are discussed in Section 4. 2. SPECKLE IMAGING OF EXOPLANET HOST STARS Speckle imaging removes the effects of turbulence in the atmosphere in order to reach the theoretical diffraction limit for a telescope with a given diameter and wavelength. Since 2010, the Differential Speckle Survey Instrument (DSSI; Horch et al. 2009) has been used to provide diffraction limited imaging of targets of interest from the Kepler/K2 mission at the 3.5 m WIYN1 telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory, the 8 m Frederick C. Gillett Gemini North telescope on the summit of MaunaKea in Hawaii, and the 8 m Gemini South telescope on the summit of Cerro Pachon in Chile. Based on the success of DSSI, two new speckle instruments were designed and built at NASA's Ames Research Center to enable validation and characterization of exoplanet candidates discovered by Kepler, K2, and future missions. The NASA-NSF Exoplanet Observational Research (NN-EXPLORE) Exoplanet Stellar Imager (NESSI) is available at WIYN (Scott et al. 2018), while the second speckle instrument, 'Alopeke, resides at Gemini North (Scott et al., in preparation). DSSI is still used as a visiting instrument at Gemini South, but a third dedicated speckle instrument, Zorro, will be commissioned there in summer 2019. All speckle instruments are available to the public, with reconstructed images and contrast limit curves produced by the speckle team and provided to the PI and/or the Exoplanet Follow-up Observing Program (ExoFOP) archives2 following each observing run. Each speckle instrument offers simultaneous two-color diffraction-limited imaging in the optical, using two EMCCD's and combinations of narrow-band (40−50 nm wide) filters, to provide simultaneous photometric and astrometric data at subarcsecond precisions. This enables the identification of background objects and companion stars that contaminate exoplanet transit detections within ∼ 0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 and up to ∼10 magnitudes fainter than the exoplanet host star. For any detected companions, speckle imaging provides the position angle, separation, and contrast from the host star, as well as color information that helps reduce the parameter space of false positives and correct exoplanet radii derived from blended binary sources (Ciardi et al. 2015). While NESSI and 'Alopeke are nearly identical instruments 1 The WIYN Observatory is a joint facility of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, and the University of Missouri 2 https://exofop.ipac.caltech.edu/ 4 Matson et al. (containing the same filters and optical components; and similar to DSSI), the aperture size of Gemini is more than twice that of WIYN, resulting in greater light gathering power and a smaller diffraction limit. Table 1 illustrates the different detection limits in terms of V - magnitudes and magnitude contrast (∆m) at WIYN and Gemini, as well as the angular resolutions obtainable using the NESSI/'Alopeke narrow band speckle filters. More details of the design parameters and characteristics of NESSI and 'Alopeke can be found in (Scott et al. 2018, and Scott et al., in preparation) and on the instrument webpages of WIYN3 and Gemini4. Table 1. Speckle Imaging Capabilities of NESSI (WIYN) and 'Alopeke/Zorro (Gemini) WIYN Gemini Typical magnitude limit (V ) 14 Typical contrast limit (∆m) Diffraction limit at 467nm Diffraction limit at 562nm Diffraction limit at 716nm Diffraction limit at 832nm 6.5 0.034(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.040(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.051(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.060(cid:48)(cid:48) 17 7 − 9 0.015(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.017(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.022(cid:48)(cid:48) 0.026(cid:48)(cid:48) For high-resolution imaging it is crucial to determine the sensitivity of the images in terms of contrast limits and how the contrast depends on separation from the primary star (Lillo-Box et al. 2014). The sensitivity of speckle imaging to companions rises sharply from the diffraction limit to a 'knee' at a separation of 0.15 − 0.2 arcseconds, where it then continues to slowly increase out to ∼1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, beyond which the speckle patterns become de-correlated (Horch et al. 2012a, 2017). While detection limits vary based on observing conditions and signal-to-noise ratios, on average speckle is sensitive to contrasts of ∼ 5 magnitudes at separations of 0.2 arcsec and ∼ 6 magnitudes at 1.0 arcsec at WIYN (Horch et al. 2017), and approximately 5 magnitudes at 0.1 arcsec separations and 7 - 9 magnitudes at 1.0 arcsec at Gemini (Horch et al. 2012b). Example 5σ detection limit curves showing the magnitude contrast (∆m) as a function of separation for 'Alopeke at 562nm (dashed yellow line) and 832nm (long dashed yellow line), and NESSI at 562nm (dashed blue line) and 832nm (long dashed blue line), are shown in Figure 1. Shaded regions show the 3σ detection limits. Stellar companions with a separation and delta magnitude that fall below a given curve are detectable with speckle imaging. DSSI has slightly lower sensitivity than 'Alopeke, as shown by the Gemini detection limit curves at 692nm (long dashed black line) and 880nm (solid black line). The left panel of Figure 1 shows the 5σ detection limit curves zoomed in on the region 0 − 0.2(cid:48)(cid:48) from the host star, highlighting the small angular separations detectable with speckle imaging and the rapid rise in sensitivity to fainter companions as a function of separation. In general, speckle imaging has higher angular resolution than near-infrared adaptive optics (AO) imaging and is therefore more sensitive to close companions, but has slightly lower sensitivity than AO to faint companions beyond ∼0.2(cid:48)(cid:48). In this regard, AO and speckle imaging are complementary techniques since most AO observations have relatively shallow detection limits within 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, as they are made at longer wavelengths, while speckle imaging provides diffraction-limited imaging over a very small field of view at shorter wavelengths. For binaries observed with DSSI at WIYN, the accuracy and precision of astrometry from speckle imaging has a typical precision less than 0.5◦ in position angle and 1 − 3 mas in separation (Horch et al. 2011), with analogous results obtained for Kepler targets observed at Gemini (Horch et al. 2012b). Speckle observations of exoplanet host stars made significant contributions to the imaging portion of the Kepler Follow-up Observation Program (Furlan et al. 2017) and have contributed directly to over 100 referred publications, having imaged over 80% of the Kepler host stars and nearly 50% of the currently known K2 candidates. These observations, publicly available at ExoFOP5, have produced thousands of host star characterizations, including the 3 http://www.wiyn.org/Instruments/wiynnessi.html 4 https://www.gemini.edu/sciops/instruments/alopeke/ 5 https://exofop.ipac.caltech.edu/ Speckle Imaging TESS data 5 Figure 1. Example 5σ detection limit curves for 'Alopeke at 562nm (dashed yellow line) and 832nm (long dashed yellow line), and NESSI at 562nm (dashed blue line) and 832nm (long dashed blue line), with shaded regions showing the 3σ detection limits. Also plotted are example DSSI detection limit curves from Gemini at 692nm (dot dashed black line) and 880nm (solid black line). The inset on the left highlights the difference in resolution achievable at WIYN (NESSI) and Gemini ('Alopeke), and the rapid increase in sensitivity between 0 − 0.2(cid:48)(cid:48) for speckle imaging. Stellar companions with a separation and delta magnitude that fall below a given curve are detectable with speckle imaging. first Earth-size planet detected in a stellar habitable zone (Kepler-186f; Quintana et al. 2014) and four small, likely rocky planets that are candidates for transit spectroscopy with JWST (K2-3b, K2-9b, K2-18b, Crossfield et al. 2016; TRAPPIST-1, Howell et al. 2016). Observations of TESS planet candidates will extend such work to planets around a wide range of stellar types and orbital distances, while validating systems and preparing for detailed follow-up. 3. UNRESOLVED STELLAR COMPANIONS IN TESS Several papers have simulated the expected exoplanet yield for TESS in order to inform target prioritization and plan for follow-up studies. Sullivan et al. (2015) simulated the population of exoplanets and eclipsing binaries that TESS will detect using the TRILEGAL galaxy model (Girardi et al. 2005) to generate a catalog of stars and added planets according to occurrence rate statistics derived from the Kepler mission (e.g. Fressin et al. 2013; Dressing & Charbonneau 2015). Since then, others have reexamined the expected TESS planet yield, including Bouma et al. (2017) who explored extended mission strategies, and Ballard (2018) who created updated planet yields for M-dwarfs. In addition, Barclay et al. (2018) reported revised estimates of the numbers and characteristics of exoplanets the TESS mission will find based on physical stars in the TESS Candidate Target List (CTL; Stassun et al. 2017) and the latest TESS hardware specifications. In this work we use the TESS predictions of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018) to examine the expected host star properties and determine the types of bound stellar companions that will be unresolved in TESS data and their impact on planetary properties. Since we anticipate Zorro, which will be identical to 'Alopeke, to be available in early 2019 we focus on the observing capabilities of 'Alopeke/Zorro and NESSI; however, DSSI will make similar contributions at Gemini South in the meantime. 3.1. Sullivan et al. 2015 The stellar population simulated by Sullivan et al. (2015, 2017) includes 1.58 × 108 stars brighter than Ks = 15, 1.81 × 109 stars between Ks = 15 and T = 21 for which TESS could detect a deep eclipse from a binary star (used as background stars to create blended binaries), and 6.18 × 109 fainter stars which serve as unresolved background stars. A catalog of simulated TESS detections from one run of the Monte Carlo simulations by Sullivan et al. (2015) contains the periods and radii of the detected planets as well as the stellar radii and effective temperatures of the host stars. We use this catalog to examine the likely stellar parameters of stars around which TESS will detect planets and ascertain the characteristics and impact of nearby stellar companions. As the primary goal of TESS is to find small planets with a measurable radial velocity signal, and it is difficult to measure precise radial velocities for stars fainter than V = 12, we only examine stars 12th magnitude or brighter. Stellar properties of the bright dwarf stars simulated 0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2Separation (arcsec)0246810'Alopeke 562nm'Alopeke 832nmNESSI 562nmNESSI 832nmDSSI (Gem) 692nmDSSI (Gem) 880nm0.00.10.20123456Magnitude Difference6 Matson et al. by Sullivan et al. (2015) are shown in Figure 2. The stellar masses are interpolated from the effective temperatures and radii provided in Sullivan et al. and the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence Table6 based on Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). Figure 2. Stellar properties of 682 simulated bright dwarf stars (V ≤ 12) with exoplanets detectable by TESS from Sullivan et al. (2015). The stellar masses are interpolated from the effective temperatures and radii given in Sullivan et al. and the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence Table based on Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). 3.1.1. Companion detections by contrast To assess the types of companions speckle imaging can detect around TESS host stars, we consider all possible bound companions for the (simulated) stars in Sullivan et al. (2015) by selecting the nearest entry in terms of effective temperature in the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence Table and assigning all stars with later spectral types (cooler effective temperatures) as possible companions. There is, in general, one entry in the table for each spectral type (0 − 9) for A, F, G, and K stars, and every 0.5 spectral type for M stars. We use the apparent V -band magnitude and distance modulus reported by Sullivan et al. (2015) to determine absolute visual magnitudes for each star, then subtract the absolute magnitude of each possible companion to get an estimated delta magnitude. We also determine delta magnitudes using apparent Ic - band magnitudes, as the Ic - band is roughly centered within the TESS badpass. The possible stellar companions for five representative stars from Sullivan et al. (2015) are illustrated in Figure 3, where each line corresponds to a star of A0 (blue), F0 (green), G0 (yellow), K0 (orange), and M0 (red) spectral types and the filled circles represent possible companions. The mass ratio (q = M2/M1; offset by q + 0.25 for clarity) is plotted as a function of magnitude difference from the primary (∆m) in V - (left) and Ic - bands (right) for each possible companion. The colors of the lines and circles correspond to the spectral type of the star/companion. While the detection limits of speckle imaging depend on both the magnitude and separation of the companion star, the left hand plot highlights the magnitude difference obtainable at 562nm with NESSI (∆m (cid:46) 6.4; dashed blue line) and 'Alopeke/Zorro (∆m (cid:46) 7.8; dashed yellow line). The right hand plot shows the same stars and possible companions in the Ic band, as well as the NESSI (∆m (cid:46) 6.3; long dashed blue line) and 'Alopeke/Zorro limits at 832nm (∆m (cid:46) 9.7; long dashed yellow line). As shown in Figure 3, speckle imaging can detect companion stars as faint as early M stars around A−F stars, and stars as faint as mid-M around G−M stars. The binary mass ratio distribution determined by Raghavan et al. (2010) for FGK stars is relatively flat (down to q ∼ 0.1) for all mass ratios, with a ∼2.5x enhancement for nearly equal mass companion stars (q > 0.95). More specifically, Duchene & Kraus (2013) report that short-period binaries are characterized by a strong peak at q ∼ 1 and a slowly declining function towards low mass ratios, while long-period binaries have a single peak around q ∼ 0.3. Similarly, for M-type systems the mass ratio distribution is flat or slightly declining towards low-q systems, with short period M-dwarf binaries also biased towards high-q systems (Duchene & Kraus 2013). While only about 15% of stars in the solar neighborhood have close, roughly equal mass companions (Furlan & Howell 2017), due to their small ∆m we expect to detect nearly all such systems, as well as the peak in mass ratio for long-period systems (depending on the projected separation) since q ∼ 0.3 (black dots) falls within the speckle contrast limits for all five spectral types shown in Figure 3. 6 Version 2017.10.19: http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/EEM_dwarf_UBVIJHK_colors_Teff.txt 2500500075001000012500Teff [K]020406080100120Mean:5878 K024R [R]020406080100120140Mean:1.10 R0200400D [pc]020406080100120Mean:137 pc0123Interpolated M [M]020406080100120140Mean:1.07 MSpeckle Imaging TESS data 7 Figure 3. Left: Mass ratio (q = M2/M1; offset by q + 0.25 for clarity) vs. V -band delta magnitude of possible companions for representative A0, F0, G0, K0, and M0 dwarfs from Sullivan et al. (2015). The colors of the lines and dots correspond to the spectral type of the star/companion. Contrast limits for speckle imaging at 562nm with NESSI and 'Alopeke/Zorro are shown by the dashed blue line (∆m (cid:46) 6.4) and dashed yellow line (∆m (cid:46) 7.8), respectively. The solid gray lines show the contrast ratios (∆m = 4.2, 6.7) at which planet radii will have 1% and 0.1% correction factors (XR = 1.01, 1.001) due to the presence of a stellar companion (see Section 3.1.1 for more details). The black dots highlight where the mass ratio for each star is q ∼ 0.3. Right: Mass ratio (offset for clarity) vs. Ic-band delta magnitude for the same stars and possible companions. Contrast limits for speckle imaging at 832nm with NESSI (∆m (cid:46) 6.3) and 'Alopeke/Zorro (∆m (cid:46) 9.7) are shown by the long dashed blue and yellow lines, respectively, while the solid gray lines again show the contrast ratios at which planet radii will have less than 1% and 0.1% correction factors due to a stellar companion. Speckle imaging can detect companion stars as faint as early M stars around A−G stars, and stars as faint as mid-M around K−M stars; however, the likelihood of detecting a companion also depends on the projected separation of the two stars (see Figures 4 & 5). Whether an unresolved binary is responsible for a transit event depends on the depth of the transit, as the transit depth provides a limit on the faintest blended binary that could produce a false positive signal matching the observed light curve. A fractional transit depth of δ = 0.01 can be reproduced by blended systems 5 magnitudes fainter than the host star (∆m), whereas a transit of δ = 10−4 (approximately an Earth-sized transit of a solar-radius star) corresponds to a system with ∆m = 10 (Morton & Johnson 2011). As seen in Figure 3, speckle imaging will be able to detect (cid:46) 10, potentially ruling out nearly all background eclipsing binaries that could mimic an companions with ∆mIc Earth-sized transit for TESS planetary candidates. If a planet candidate is confirmed but one or more stellar companions are detected nearby, the extra flux from the companion(s) must be accounted for when deriving the planet radius. As the transit depth of a planet depends on the ratio of the squared radii of the transiting object and the host star, the effect of the dilution can be accounted for and the radius corrected. Ciardi et al. (2015) defined a radius correction factor, XR, as the ratio of the true planet radius to the observed planet radius. Assuming the planet orbits the primary/host star, a companion with ∆m = 1 will result in the true planet radius being 1.18 times larger than the measured radius (XR = 1.18), whereas a companion with ∆m = 5 will only be overestimated by 1.005. Therefore, to get planet radii accurate to ∼ 1% (XR = 1.01), any companions with a magnitude difference of ∆m (cid:46) 4.3 need to be detected and accounted for. The contrast ratios at which stellar companions will bias planetary radii by 1% and 0.1% (XR = 1.001) are highlighted in Figure 3 by solid gray lines. Such companions are, in general, easily observable with speckle imaging, which will allow for the detection of nearly all stellar companions capable of diluting planetary transits. However, if there is more than one companion or the planet orbits a companion star, the radius correction factor can be XR = 2 − 5 for binary systems and even higher for triple systems, depending on the size and brightness of the companion star(s). Assuming planets are equally likely to orbit the primary or secondary stars, the mean correction factor for unvetted Kepler systems was determined to be ∼ 1.5 by Ciardi et al. (2015), whereas the correction factor drops to XR = 1.2 with high resolution vetting. The brighter, closer host stars of TESS will increase the effectiveness of such high-resolution imaging, however, decreasing the mean correction factor for vetted TESS candidates to XR ∼ 1.07 (Ciardi et al. 2015). 3.1.2. Companion detections by separation 0.02.55.07.510.012.515.017.5Delta V Magnitude (mv)0.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.752.00Mass Ratio (M2/M1)A0F0G0K0M0NESSI - 562nm`Alopeke - 562nmXR=1%XR=0.1%A starF starG starK starM star05101520Delta Ic Magnitude (mIc)0.000.250.500.751.001.251.501.752.00Mass Ratio (M2/M1)A0F0G0K0M0`Alopeke - 832nmNESSI - 832nmXR=0.1%XR=1%A starF starG starK starM star8 Matson et al. Figure 4. Binary period distributions for representative A − M (simulated) star primaries from Sullivan et al. (2015). The distribution for M stars (0.1 > M(cid:12) > 0.6; red curve) peaks at close separations with a shallow tail that extends to large log P . The shaded regions (color coded by spectral type of the primary) show the orbital periods corresponding to projected separations at which 'Alopeke/Zorro (832nm) can detect companions around stars at distances of 50, 125, 250, and 500pc. The solid black lines border the regions observable with speckle (0.026 - 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2), while the dashed lines highlight the TESS pixel size (21(cid:48)(cid:48)) converted to log P space using the mass of the corresponding star. Companion stars beyond the speckle field of view of 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 will be detectable by other imaging techniques as indicated by the hatched regions. The fraction of stars for a given spectral type that fall within each distance range are noted as percentages on the individual subplots, e.g. 58% of the G stars in Sullivan et al. (2015) have distances between 50 - 125pc, with six (unplotted) B stars located between 250 - 500 pc. When determining which stellar companions speckle imaging is sensitive to, the separation of the components must also be considered. Speckle imaging can detect companions at the diffraction limit of the telescope out to ∼1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, limited primarily by the need for correlated speckle patterns in the primary and secondary stars, which only occurs over small separations (see Horch et al. 2012a, 2017). At separations greater than ∼ 1(cid:48)(cid:48) other high-resolution imaging techniques, 1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0D = 50pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.020%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%D = 125pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.045%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%D = 250pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.035%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%D = 500pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.037%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.037%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.024%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.059%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.035%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.066%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.013%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%log P (days)Normalized FrequencySpeckle Imaging TESS data 9 such as AO or wide-field speckle imaging (see Scott et al. 2018; Casetti-Dinescu & Horch 2019, in prep.), can be used to detect stellar companions. Since the projected separation of a stellar companion depends on the physical size of the companion's orbit, as well as the distance to the system, we use binary period distributions for A, F, G, K, and M stars to determine the likely orbits detectable with speckle imaging. For solar-type stars, the orbital period distribution is typically parameterized as a log-normal distribution with a maximum at P ∼ 250 yr (a ∼ 45 AU) and a dispersion of σlog P ≈ 2.3 (Duchene & Kraus 2013). We use the mean semi-major axis (converted to mean period via Kepler's third law) and standard deviation of log P values for A−M stars as detailed in Table 3 of Sullivan et al. (2015) to determine the log-normal period distribution for each simulated star in Sullivan et al. Binary period distributions, in terms of log P , for the representative A0, F0, G0, K0, and M0 stars are plotted in Figure 4. To convert the angular resolution of speckle imaging into log P limits (shown as solid black lines in Fig. 4), we use distances of D = 50, 125, 250, and 500 pc and the mass of each of the five representative stars (for Kepler's third law) from Sullivan et al. (2015). The shaded region under each curve highlights the portion of log P space that is detectable using 'Alopeke/Zorro at 832 nm (0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2), while the hatched areas depict the regions of log P space in which companions can be detected using other high-resolution and seeing-limited imaging techniques (∼1.2− 21(cid:48)(cid:48)). Figure 5 shows the same representative A0, F0, G0, K0, and M0 stars at distances of D = 50, 125, 250, and 500 pc, with the shaded regions depicting speckle limits of NESSI at 562 nm (0.04 - 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2) in log P space. The smaller aperture of WIYN, and therefore larger diffraction limit, means speckle imaging with NESSI is not as sensitive to companions around M-type stars at distances greater than ∼100 pc and short-period companions in G- and K-type stars at distances greater than ∼ 200 pc, respectively. Figure 4 demonstrates that for distances less than ∼125 pc, speckle imaging with 'Alopeke/Zorro is sensitive to a majority of companions around G-, K-, and M-type stars, but at distances greater than ∼150 pc the peak of the companion distribution for M stars cannot be angularly resolved. However, TESS is not sensitive to small, short duration transits around such faint stars. On the other hand, speckle imaging will be able to detect the peak of the companion distribution for A − K stars at distances greater than ∼150 pc. While not all companions with angular separations of ∼0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 will be detected due to contrast limits varying with separation, sub-optimal observing conditions, orbital phase effects, inclination effects, etc., examining the fraction of companion stars within the reach of speckle imaging is useful for assessing the parameter space probed with this technique and understanding the regions that can be vetted. Of the 682 stars in our sample from Sullivan et al. (2015), 10% have distances less than 50 pc, 48% are between 50− 125pc, 30% are between 125− 250pc, and 10% have distances between 250− 500pc (see Figs. 4 & 5 for breakdown by spectral type and distance). Based on the companion orbital period distributions and the individual distances of the host stars in Sullivan et al., speckle imaging at 562nm using 'Alopeke/Zorro can detect 99% of companions around 307 of the stars, 90% of companions around 522 stars, and at least 50% of companions around 621 stars. If we include the capabilities of other techniques to detect companions at separations greater than 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 (hatched regions in Figure 4), only 48 (7%) systems have companion distributions that are not fully vetted to > 90%. 3.2. Barlcay et al. 2018 As the recent paper by Barclay et al. (2018) revised the exoplanet yields expected from TESS using stars from the CTL, a prioritized subset of stars from the TESS Input Catalog (Stassun et al. 2017) deemed most suitable for the detection of small planets, we also examine the host star properties and expected stellar companions for their sample of predicted exoplanet host stars. The CTL contains 3.8 × 106 cool dwarf stars over the entire sky bright enough for TESS to observe, as well as scientifically valuable M dwarfs. Barclay et al. (2018) determined which stars from version 6.17 of the CTL are observable with TESS and simulated likely 2-minute cadence targets based on their ranking in the CTL and a realistic distribution of targets among the different sectors TESS will observe. Then, they assigned zero or more planets to each of the 3.18 × 106 stars observable with TESS, resulting in predictions that TESS will detect ∼ 1300 transiting planets, 286 of which will be smaller than 2 Earth-radii and 46 smaller than 1.25 Earth-radii. We use properties of the detected planets and host stars from the simulation that provided the median number of planets quoted in Barclay et al. (2018) to examine the likely stellar parameters of host stars and any possible companions, as well as to compare with the results of Sullivan et al. (2015). We again trim the sample so that all stars are brighter than or equal to V = 12 and amenable to radial velocity measurements. Unlike the sample from 7 The TIC and CTL are available from the MAST archive at http://archive.stsci.edu/TESS 10 Matson et al. Figure 5. Binary period distributions for representative A − M star primaries from Sullivan et al. (2015), similar to Figure 4, depicting the orbital periods corresponding to the projected separations for which NESSI (562nm) can detect companions (0.04 - 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2). Due to the smaller aperture at WIYN, companion stars cannot be detected as close to the host star, resulting in more regions of parameter space not vetted by speckle imaging. Sullivan et al. (2015), which contains only the planets detected in 2-minute cadence observations, the planet and host star properties given in Barclay et al. (2018) contain stars with planets from the 2-minute cadence and full frame observations, resulting in nearly four times as many stars. As the 2-minute cadence results are more likely to produce targets for precision radial velocity and JWST follow-up, and to enable better comparison with Sullivan et al. (2015), we exclude stars with planets detected via full frame observations. Stellar properties of the remaining 787 dwarf stars expected to produce transiting exoplanets are shown in Figure 6, and are similar to those of Sullivan et al. (see Fig. 2). Barclay et al. (2018) note that roughly half of their target stars do not have distances reported in version 6.1 of the CTL, and a limited number have unrealistically large distances, but that these issues have been corrected in CTL v6.2. 1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0 0%A0D = 50pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.020%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%D = 125pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.045%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%45%D = 250pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.035%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%D = 500pc1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F0 2%F01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.037%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.037%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%37%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.024%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%24%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G0 3%G01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.059%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%59%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.035%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%35%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K021%K01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.066%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%66%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.013%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%13%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M0100%M01041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%1041061080.00.20.40.60.81.0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%log P (days)Normalized FrequencyWe therefore adopt the updated stellar parameters (Teff , log g, radius, mass, and distance) from version 6.2 for our analysis; however, 26 of the target stars still have no reported distances. Speckle Imaging TESS data 11 Figure 6. Stellar properties of 787 bright dwarf stars (V ≤ 12) with exoplanets detectable by TESS in simulated 2-minute cadence observations from Barclay et al. (2018). Stellar parameters are adopted from CTL v6.2, however there are 26 stars with no distance provided. The distributions are similar to those of Sullivan et al. (2015, see Fig. 2), although the mean parameter values are slightly larger for stars in Barclay et al. (2018) 3.2.1. Companion detections To assess which companions speckle imaging can detect around TESS stars from Barclay et al. (2018), we again consider all possible bound companions by selecting stars with later spectral types from the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence Table. As the host stars used by Barclay et al. are real stars from the TESS Input Catalog, we reproduce the stellar properties from the CTL v6.2 for each star with V ≤ 12 in Table 2, as well as provide limits on the companions speckle imaging can detect for each star. The first eight columns list the TESS Input Catalog ID, M∗, R∗, Teff , V - magnitude, TESS magnitude (T ), distance, and spectral type inferred from the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence Table for each star. The following two columns give the expected spectral types for companions with ∆mv = 6 and 8 relative to the potential host star, typical 'Alopeke/Zorro speckle imaging contrast limits at 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)1 and 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)0, respectively. To estimate the fraction of possible companions that fall within the delta magnitude limits of speckle imaging for each star, we determine the number of companions with ∆mv ≤ 8 from all companions that result in q ≥ 0.1 and weight the likelihood of each companion by the mass ratio distribution of Raghavan et al. (2010), such that companions with mass ratios of 0.1 ≤ q ≤ 0.95 are equally likely and those with q > 0.95 are enhanced by 2.5x. This fraction of detectable companions for each star is listed in Table 2 under 'Comp. Frac.' Since we subtract the absolute visual magnitude of each possible companion from the absolute visual magnitude of the corresponding star in Barclay et al. (2018, derived from apparent V magnitude and distance in the CTL v6.2), there are slight differences in companion fractions between stars of the same spectral type. There are also three giant stars (TIC 27011422, TIC 359069654, TIC 445806156) whose properties are not well represented by The Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence, resulting in unrealistic companion spectral types and companion fractions. Next, we examine the log-normal binary period distributions for the stars in Barclay et al. (2018). Converting the log P distribution to mean semi-major axis values via the mass and distance of each star, we use the limits of speckle imaging with 'Alopeke/Zorro at 562nm (0.017− 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2) to determine the minimum and maximum physical separations at which companions may be detectable via speckle imaging; listed in Table 2 as 'Min Sep' and 'Max Sep' in AU. Stars without distance estimates are listed for completeness, but no analysis of possible companions is included. Of the 787 stars from Barclay et al. (2018) with V ≤ 12, 6% have distances less than 50 pc, 34% have 50 < D < 125 pc, 48% have 125 < D < 250pc, and 8% have 250 < D < 500pc, with 2 stars at D > 500 pc and 26 stars (3%) with unknown distances. The fraction of the companion orbital period distribution observable with speckle imaging (similar to the shaded regions in Fig. 4) is given in Table 2 under 'Distr. Frac.' To determine the total fraction of companion stars detectable with speckle imaging, we multiply the fraction of companions with ∆m less than the 'Alopeke speckle limit and the fraction of the companion period distribution observable with speckle ('Comp. Frac.' × 'Distr. Frac.'). The estimated fraction of detectable companions for each star in Barclay et al. (2018) is listed in the last column of Table 2 as 'Speckle Frac'. Figure 7 shows the distribution 2500500075001000012500Teff [K]020406080100120Mean:5918 K024R [R]020406080100120140Mean:1.34 R0200400D [pc]020406080100120Mean:151 pc0123M [M]020406080100120140Mean:1.13 M12 Matson et al. Table 2. Stellar parameters and companion space observable with speckle imaging for stars in Barclay et al. 2018 TIC-ID M∗ (M(cid:12)) R∗ (R(cid:12)) Teff V T D SpT Companion SpT at: Comp. Min Sep Max Sep Distr. Speckle (K) (mag) (mag) (pc) ∆mv = 6 ∆mv = 8 Frac. (AU) (AU) Frac. Frac. 593228 0.253 0.268 3263 11.88 682491 0.736 0.766 4702 8.13 4026095 0.954 1.011 5458 10.62 4064734 1.137 1.134 6076 10.29 5645875 1.132 1.03 5649 6029735 1.572 1.973 7090 6077288 1.243 1.031 6314 7218620 1.033 1.381 5480 8.76 6.45 8.87 10.2 9.3 7.05 9.78 9.77 8.14 6.2 8.34 9.63 7320573 1.043 1.011 5804 11.11 10.58 176.3 7444739 1.392 1.506 6688 9.33 8.9 158.3 15.12 M3.5V · · · 133.39 G8V K4V 148.69 51.12 64.27 71.84 137.42 F9V G5V F1V F6V G8V G2V F3V M6V · · · M2.5V M2V M3V K7V M2V M2V M2.5V M0.5V M8V · · · M4V M3.5V M4V M2V M3.5V M3.5V M4V M3V 0.958 · · · 0.865 0.97 0.889 0.91 1.0 0.8 0.968 1.0 0.26 · · · 2.33 2.6 0.89 1.12 1.25 2.4 3.08 2.76 18.14 · · · 160.07 178.43 61.34 77.12 86.21 164.9 211.55 189.95 1.0 · · · 0.989 0.993 0.712 0.019 0.879 0.99 0.997 0.995 0.958 · · · 0.856 0.963 0.632 0.018 0.879 0.792 0.965 0.995 Note -- Table 2 is published in its entirety in the machine readable format. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content. of the total fraction of possible companions across all stars in the Barclay et al. (2018) sample with V ≤ 12. The histogram on the left is limited to the companions detectable within the ∼ 0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 angular resolution limits of speckle imaging (similar to the shaded regions in Figure 4), while the right side shows the distribution of the fraction of companions detectable with speckle and other imaging techniques (∼ 0.02− 21(cid:48)(cid:48); similar to the shaded and hatched regions of Figure 4). The distribution of companions detectable with speckle imaging (∼ 0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2) for each spectral type is shown in Figure 8. For stars in Barclay et al. (2018), 99% of all possible companions will be detected using 'Alopeke/Zorro at 562nm for 63 (8%) of the 761 stars with known distances. For 353 (46%) of the stars, 90% of companions will be detected, and for 589 (77%) stars at least 70% of the companions will be detected with speckle imaging. If we include other techniques that are capable of detecting companions at separations greater than 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, 90% of companions will be detected for 507 (67%) of the Barclay et al. (2018) stars, and 70% of companions will be detected for 745 stars (98%). Figure 7. Distribution of the estimated total fraction of possible companions that are detectable with speckle imaging around stars in Barclay et al. (2018) with V ≤ 12 (last column of Table 2). The histogram on the left is limited to the companions detectable within the ∼ 0.02 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 angular resolution limits of speckle imaging (similar to the shaded regions in Figure 4), while the right side shows the distribution of the fraction of companions detectable with speckle and other imaging techniques (∼ 0.02 − 21(cid:48)(cid:48); similar to the shaded + hatched regions of Figure 4). 0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable with Speckle Imaging0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7Fraction of Barclay Sample0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable with Imaging0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7Fraction of Barclay SampleSpeckle Imaging TESS data 13 Figure 8. Distributions of the fraction of possible companions detectable with speckle imaging around stars in Barclay et al. (2018), similar to the left hand side of Figure 7, shown by spectral type. 4. DISCUSSION The TESS planet yield simulations of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018) individually estimate that approximately 700 planets will be found around stars brighter than V = 12 via TESS 2-minute cadence observations. Sullivan et al. (2015) further estimate that more than 1000 astrophysical false positives are expected from the 2- minute cadence data. Assuming half of the astrophysical false positives have V ≤ 12, roughly 1200 transiting events (excluding false positives due to instrumental effects) will need to be confirmed before more detailed characterization is possible. While the TESS 2-minute cadence targets are, in general, bright and nearby, it will take considerable time and resources to weed out false positives and identify candidates for further study. We have shown that speckle imaging is capable of detecting stellar companions within ∼ 0.02− 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2 and ∆m (cid:46) 7− 9 of planet candidate host stars, thereby eliminating some or all false positive scenarios due to background eclipsing binaries, as well as detecting excess flux that can dilute a planetary transit and lead to overestimated planetary radii. In addition to detecting nearby companions at relatively high contrasts, speckle imaging is extremely efficient, obtaining diffraction limited images in two colors for 30 − 50 host stars per night. For the approximately 1200 planet candidates around bright stars that will need to be vetted before detailed RV and atmospheric follow-up is undertaken, speckle imaging will be able to observe them in roughly 30 nights. The speckle team typically devotes 4−8 nights per observing semester to exoplanet host 0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable by Speckle0.0000.0020.0040.0060.0080.0100.0120.014Fraction of Barclay SampleA stars0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable by Speckle0.000.050.100.150.20Fraction of Barclay SampleF stars0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable by Speckle0.0000.0250.0500.0750.1000.1250.1500.175Fraction of Barclay SampleG stars0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable by Speckle0.000.020.040.060.08Fraction of Barclay SampleK stars0.00.20.40.60.81.0Fraction of Companions Detectable by Speckle0.0000.0020.0040.0060.008Fraction of Barclay SampleM stars14 Matson et al. star high-resolution imaging, and has been funded to continue to provide this community resource for the next three years, allowing for all of the bright TESS candidates to be observed within 2 − 3 years. As demonstrated in Section 3.1.1, speckle imaging is capable of detecting stellar companions approaching ∆m = 10 at 832nm, corresponding to the limiting magnitude for which TESS transits with fractional depths of ∼10−4 can be caused by background binary stars. While speckle imaging will be unable to detect every companion around candidate host stars, the M-type stars that will typically be missed are unlikely to be the cause of such transit events. Faint companions that are close to the host star where the contrast limits for speckle are not as large may also remain undetected, although speckle will be able to provide tight constraints on such unresolved companions.Furthermore, the nearby stars targeted by TESS will increase the on-sky angular separation of stellar companions, enabling speckle imaging to probe physical separations of a few AU (see Table 2), the effective outer limit for spectroscopic sensitivity to binaries. Thus, with the addition of spectroscopy, essentially no stellar companion will remain undetectable. For stars that are bright enough (magnitudes (cid:46) 8), long-baseline interferometry also provides a way to detect companions at separations down to sub-milliarcsecond separations. Even planet candidates that are able to be confirmed via other methods require high-resolution imaging to ensure there are no unresolved stars diluting the transit signal, as (cid:38) 40% of exoplanet host stars have a bound companion (Horch et al. 2014; Matson et al. 2018; Ziegler et al. 2018a). Without high-resolution imaging more than 95% of the bound stellar companions (< 1(cid:48)(cid:48)) remain unknown, and as a result, the derived planetary radii are systematically biased to smaller radii by a factor of ∼ 1.1x for TESS (Ciardi et al. 2015). Vetting with speckle imaging can detect and characterize bound stellar companions and, thus, reduce the radius bias. To ensure that any unresolved companions will not bias a planet's radius by more than 1%, all companions with ∆m (cid:46) 4.3 need to be detected or ruled out. Such contrast ratios are obtainable with speckle imaging, allowing the light from close companions to be accurately deblended when calculating the true radius and density of identified planets, resulting in accurate planetary properties and occurrence rates. In addition to spectroscopic observations, speckle imaging will be complemented by other high-resolution and seeing- limited imaging. The 21(cid:48)(cid:48) pixels of TESS will require observations at a variety of angular scales to distinguish between multiple stellar sources contained within the TESS aperture as the source of any dips in brightness. Gaia, in particular, has already provided astrometry and photometry of more than a billion stars in the galaxy (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018), which will aid in the identification of nearby stars around TESS planet candidate host stars. Gaia's imaging resolution is 0.2(cid:48)(cid:48) × 0.7(cid:48)(cid:48), however, and not sensitive to low-contrast, sub-arcsecond companions, recovering only ∼ 20% of companions detected by Robo-AO within 1(cid:48)(cid:48) of Kepler planet hosts (Ziegler et al. 2018b). In general, Robo-AO is sensitive to companions with contrasts of ∆m < 4 at separations of 0.5 − 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)5 and contrasts of ∆m < 7 at 1.5 − 4.(cid:48)(cid:48)0 (Ziegler et al. 2018c), and therefore not as sensitive to close-in and/or faint companions as speckle imaging. The use of multiple high-resolution imaging techniques, however, provides different sensitivities and resolutions which are valuable in ruling out as many false positives scenarios as possible and obtaining the most accurate orbital and physical parameters of the transiting object. In addition to vetting planet candidates and yielding more accurate planetary radii, speckle imaging provides an assessment of stellar multiplicity for planet host stars that is crucial to understanding the role and influence of stellar companions on planet formation and evolution. Obtaining simultaneous images in two colors results in robust determinations of multiple star position angles, separations, and magnitude differences, important for setting strong detection limits, as well as providing color information that can be used to estimate stellar parameters. Stellar parameters of the individual stars can be used to establish whether the detected companion is consistent with a bound companion by comparing the measured color to that predicted for a model bound companion via isochrones (e.g. Everett et al. 2015; Hirsch et al. 2017). If the system is found to be a bound binary, then the companion may have played a dynamical role in the evolution of the planetary system and can provide clues to the role of stellar companions in planet formation and evolution. For instance, confirming the properties of such bound systems can elucidate the impact stellar companions have on planet formation and resolve inconsistencies in the stellar multiplicity rates of exoplanet host stars. Continued monitoring of detected companions with speckle imaging can also confirm whether the companions are physically bound via common proper motions or relative astrometry, and potentially lead to high-precision orbits and stellar masses for short-period systems. Long-term orbit monitoring of exoplanet host stars can further shed light on whether certain binary configurations are more likely for planet formation, as orbital parameters such as eccentricity and mutual inclination can impact the role of stellar companions in planet formation and planetary system architectures Speckle Imaging TESS data 15 (Dupuy et al. 2016). Determining whether stellar companions are in the same plane as the transiting planets can therefore aid binary star and exoplanet formation and evolution models. 5. SUMMARY We examine the ability of speckle imaging to detect stellar companions that will be unresolved in TESS data and with most other high-resolution imaging techniques. Using the simulated host star populations of Sullivan et al. (2015) and Barclay et al. (2018), we calculated the contrast ratios and binary period distributions of all possible stellar companions for each host star based on the Modern Mean Dwarf Stellar Color and Effective Temperature Sequence of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). By detecting companions with contrasts of ∆m (cid:46) 7 − 9, speckle imaging can detect companion stars as faint as early M stars around A−F stars and stars as faint as mid-M around G−M stars. This places strong constraints on blended eclipsing binaries as the source of brightness variations in TESS light curves, which will facilitate the rapid validation of hundreds of planet candidates and pave the way for further characterization efforts. Speckle imaging also enables de-blending of flux contributions from stellar companions, which ensures planetary radii are free from contamination at the ∼ 1% level and improves the accuracy of derived planet occurrence rates. With speckle imaging able to detect companions at separations of ∼ 0.02−1.(cid:48)(cid:48)2, at least 90% of the binary period distribution can be searched for nearly half of TESS planet candidate host stars with V ≤ 12, and more than 50% of the binary period distribution will be imaged in ∼ 83% of the host stars. For the estimated 1200 planet candidates around bright stars that will be discovered in TESS 2-min cadence ob- servations, speckle imaging will complete high-resolution follow-up observations in 2 − 3 years. Reconstructed images and contrast limit curves produced by the speckle team, which will be available in the ExoFOP archives, will detect nearby stars that are not resolved in the TESS Input Catalog or by seeing-limited photometry. Such high-resolution imaging is critical for both exoplanet validation and for accurate characterization of planetary systems. Nearly 50% of all exoplanet host stars are in multiple star systems, and the existence of companion stars must be accounted for when determining planetary properties. For transiting planets, high-resolution imaging can determine the flux dilution due to any companion stars, and therefore the true radius of the planet, necessary for deriving the bulk composition and atmospheric properties of the planet. Additionally, high-resolution imaging samples up to 99% of the expected binary star distribution for systems located within a few hundred parsecs, allowing for studies of the influence of multiple stars on planetary demographics, formation, and evolution. Not accounting for the effects of stellar multiplicity also statistically biases planets toward smaller radii and gives rise to systematic errors in planet occurrence rates and completeness corrections. The authors would like to thank all of the excellent staff at the WIYN and Gemini telescopes for their help during our observing runs. We gratefully acknowledge the support for our speckle imaging program given by the NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program and the role of the Kepler Science Office in upgrading DSSI to the two-EMCCD mode. This research has made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive and the Exoplanet Follow-up Observation Program website, which are operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA under the Exoplanet Exploration Program. RM's research was supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the NASA Ames Research Center, administered by Universities Space Research Association under contract with NASA. Facilities: WIYN, Gemini:Gillett, Gemini:South Software: Python, Numpy, Matplotlib, SciPy, AstroPy, Jupyter Notebook REFERENCES Ballard, S. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. Bouma, L. G., Winn, J. N., Kosiarek, J., & McCullough, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04949 Barclay, T., Pepper, J., & Quintana, E. V. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05050 Bouma, L. G., Masuda, K., & Winn, J. N. 2018, AJ, 155, 244, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabfb8 P. R. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08891 Casetti-Dinescu, D. I., & Horch, E. P. 2019, in prep. 16 Matson et al. Ciardi, D. R., Beichman, C. A., Horch, E. P., & Howell, Kempton, E. M.-R., Bean, J. L., Louie, D. R., et al. 2018, S. B. 2015, ApJ, 805, 16, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/16 ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.03671 Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Huber, D., Mann, A. W., & Crossfield, I. J. M., Ciardi, D. R., Petigura, E. A., et al. 2016, ApJS, 226, 7, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/226/1/7 Deacon, N. R., Kraus, A. L., Mann, A. W., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4212, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2132 Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2015, ApJ, 807, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/45 Duchene, G., & Kraus, A. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 269, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602 Dupuy, T. J., Kratter, K. M., Kraus, A. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 80, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/80 Everett, M. E., Barclay, T., Ciardi, D. R., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 55, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/55 Fressin, F., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/81 Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb Furlan, E., & Howell, S. B. 2017, AJ, 154, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 Dupuy, T. J. 2016, AJ, 152, 8, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/8 Lillo-Box, J., Barrado, D., & Bouy, H. 2014, A&A, 566, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423497 Madhusudhan, N., Knutson, H., Fortney, J. J., & Barman, T. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 739, doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch032 Matson, R. A., Howell, S. B., Horch, E. P., & Everett, M. E. 2018, AJ, 156, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac778 Morley, C. V., Kreidberg, L., Rustamkulov, Z., Robinson, T., & Fortney, J. J. 2017, ApJ, 850, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa927b Morton, T. D. 2012, ApJ, 761, 6, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/6 Morton, T. D., & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ, 738, 170, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/170 Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y. 2017, ApJ, 847, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa890a Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9, Furlan, E., Ciardi, D. R., Everett, M. E., et al. 2017, AJ, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 153, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/71 Quintana, E. V., Barclay, T., Raymond, S. N., et al. 2014, Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. Science, 344, 277, doi: 10.1126/science.1249403 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou, E., & da Costa, L. 2005, A&A, 436, 895, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042352 Hirsch, L. A., Ciardi, D. R., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/117 Horch, E. P., Bahi, L. A. P., Gaulin, J. R., et al. 2012a, AJ, 143, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/1/10 Horch, E. P., Gomez, S. C., Sherry, W. H., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/45 Horch, E. P., Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., & Ciardi, D. R. 2012b, AJ, 144, 165, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/6/165 -- . 2014, ApJ, 795, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/60 Horch, E. P., Veillette, D. R., Baena Gall´e, R., et al. 2009, ApJS, 190, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 Scott, N. J., Howell, S. B., Horch, E. P., & Everett, M. E. 2018, PASP, 130, 054502, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aab484 Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.00495 Sullivan, P. W., Winn, J. N., Berta-Thompson, Z. K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 77, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/77 -- . 2017, ApJ, 837, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/99 Torres, G., Fressin, F., Batalha, N. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/24 AJ, 137, 5057, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/5057 Wang, J., Fischer, D. A., Xie, J.-W., & Ciardi, D. R. 2014a, Horch, E. P., Casetti-Dinescu, D. I., Camarata, M. A., et al. ApJ, 791, 111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/111 2017, AJ, 153, 212, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6749 Wang, J., Xie, J.-W., Barclay, T., & Fischer, D. A. 2014b, Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., Horch, E. P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 783, 4, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/4 ApJL, 829, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L2 Ziegler, C., Law, N. M., Morton, T., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, Howell, S. B., Everett, M. E., Sherry, W., Horch, E., & 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/66 Ciardi, D. R. 2011, AJ, 142, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/19 Johnson, J. A., Petigura, E. A., Fulton, B. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80e7 Ziegler, C., Law, N. M., Baranec, C., et al. 2018a, AJ, 156, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aace59 -- . 2018b, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10142 -- . 2018c, AJ, 155, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab042
1210.5335	1	1210	2012-10-19T08:06:28	Calculation of the Solar Activity Effect on the Production Rate of Cosmogenic Radiocarbon in Polar Ice	[ "astro-ph.EP", "physics.geo-ph" ]	The propagation of cosmic rays in the Earth's atmosphere is simulated. Calculations of the omnidirectional differential flux of neutrons for different solar activity levels are presented. The solar activity effect on the production rate of cosmogenic radiocarbon by the nuclear-interacting and muon components of cosmic rays in polar ice is studied. It has been obtained that the $^{14}C$ production rate in ice by the cosmic ray nuclear-interacting component is lower or higher than the average value by 30% during periods of solar activity maxima or minima, respectively. Calculations of the altitudinal dependence of the radiocarbon production rate in ice by the cosmic ray components are illustrated.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 Calculation of the Solar Activity Effect on the Production Rate of Cosmogenic Radiocarbon in Polar Ice A.V. Nesterenok1 and V.O. Naidenov Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Polytechnicheskaya St. 26, Saint Petersburg, 194021 Russia Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya St. 29, Saint Petersburg, 195251 Russia 1e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The propagation of cosmic rays in the Earth(cid:48)s atmosphere is simulated. Calculations of the omnidi- rectional differential flux of neutrons for different solar activity levels are presented. The solar activity effect on the production rate of cosmogenic radiocarbon by the nuclear-interacting and muon compo- nents of cosmic rays in polar ice is studied. It has been obtained that the 14C production rate in ice by the cosmic ray nuclear-interacting component is lower or higher than the average value by 30% during periods of solar activity maxima or minima, respectively. Calculations of the altitudinal dependence of the radiocarbon production rate in ice by the cosmic ray components are illustrated. Introduction 1 Cosmogenic radionuclides are produced in the Earth(cid:48)s atmosphere and in matter on the Earth(cid:48)s surface in nuclear reactions caused by primary and secondary cosmic rays. The data on the cosmogenic radionuclide concentration in natural archives, such as tree rings and soil and ice layers, bear information on changes in the primary cosmic ray intensity. Radioactive isotope 14C is accumulated in polar ice together with atmospheric air precipitation in ice at the stage of glacier ice formation from firn. The nuclide production in reactions caused by secondary cosmic rays (in situ production) is another mechanism by which radiocarbon is accumulated in ice. Spallation reactions of oxygen atoms by neutrons of the cosmic ray nuclear-interacting component mainly contribute to the radiocarbon production in the upper ice layers. At depths larger than the depth of penetration of the cosmic ray neutrons (several meters), 14C is produced in reactions caused by cosmic ray muons. The 14C production rate in ice by secondary cosmic rays depends on the cosmic ray intensity. Geo- magnetic field variations do not affect galactic cosmic ray fluxes in polar regions. Thus, data on the in situ 14C concentration in polar ice samples can be used as chronicles of solar activity variations in the past [1]. The present work studies the effect of solar activity variations on the radiocarbon production rate in ice by different cosmic ray components. The aim of this work is to quantitatively estimate the effect of the considered factor. 2 1 0 2 t c O 9 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 3 3 5 . 0 1 2 1 : v i X r a 2 Numerical calculations 2.1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Spectrum At energies higher than several hundreds of MeV, galactic cosmic rays make the main contribution to the particle flux in the near Earth space. Protons and alpha particles account for about 90 and 10% of the total number of galactic cosmic ray particles, respectively. The particle fraction of heavier nuclei does not exceed 1%. The flux of galactic cosmic rays has a high degree of isotropy [2]. -- 1 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 For particle energies lower than 10 GeV/nucleon, the flux of galactic cosmic rays in the near Earth space depends substantially on the solar activity level. The expression for the differential energy spectrum of i particles with mass and charge numbers Ai and Zi has the following form in the force field model [3]: Ji(E) = Ji,LIS(E + Φi) E(E + 2mpc2) (E + Φi)(E + Φi + 2mpc2) (1) where Ji,LIS(E) is the differential energy spectrum of the i particles of galactic cosmic rays in the local interstellar space; E is the particle kinetic energy per nucleon; mpc2 is the proton rest energy; Φi = (eZi/Ai)φ; e is the elementary charge; and φ is the parameter of cosmic ray modulation in the heliosphere. The following expression from [4] is used as a Ji,LIS(E) approximation: Ji,LIS(E) = Ci p(E)−2.78 1 + 0.487p(E)−2.51 (2) where parameter E corresponds to the particle kinetic energy in GeV/nucleon, Ci is the normalization factor, Cp = 1.9 × 104 (m2 s sr GeV)−1 for protons, and CHe = 9.5 × 102 (m2 s sr GeV/nucleon)−1 for helium nuclei. Usoskin et al. (2005) [4] presented the results of a reconstruction of the solar modulation parameter based on neutron monitor data for 1951-2004. The monthly average values of modulation parameter φ vary from 0.3 to 2 GV, and the average φ value for the considered time interval is 0.69 GV. In our calculations, we selected the minimal and maximal values of the modulation parameter equal to 0.3 and 1.2 GV, respectively. A parameter value of 0.3 GV corresponds to the monthly average value of the modulation parameter at a minimum of cycle 22, and 1.2 GV corresponds to the average annual value of this parameter at the cycle maximum [4]. The form of the energy spectrum of galactic cosmic ray particles at low energies in the force field model depends on the charge-to-mass number ratio Z/A. For nuclei with charge numbers Z ≥ 2, Z/A ≈ 1/2. The contribution of nuclei with Z ≥ 2 to cosmic ray particle fluxes in the Earth(cid:48)s matter was determined by multiplying the data obtained for 4He nuclei of galactic cosmic rays by coefficient k, which is the ratio of the nucleon flux caused by the nuclei of elements with Z ≥ 2 to such a flux caused by galactic cosmic ray 4He nuclei. Based on the parameters of the energy spectra presented in [5], it was found that k = 1.44. We ignored the geomagnetic cutoff of the cosmic ray differential energy spectrum, since we consider the production of cosmogenic 14C in polar ice at high geomagnetic latitudes. 2.2 Atmospheric Model In the numerical model, we assumed that the Earth radius and the height of the atmosphere are 6371 and 100 km, respectively. It was also assumed that the atmosphere includes 0.755, 0.232, and 0.013 mass fractions of nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, respectively [6]. The atmosphere was modeled in the form of concentric layers with a constant air density within a layer. It was assumed that the thickness of each atmospheric layer is 15 g/cm2. The total thickness of the atmosphere was taken to be equal to 1034 g/cm2. The dependence of the air density on altitude corresponds to the average air density at latitudes higher than 60◦N according to the COSPAR data. In the calculations, we assumed that the Earth(cid:48)s surface layer is composed of H2O ice with a density of 0.917 g/cm3. 2.3 Physical Model The numerical code for modeling cascades of cosmic ray particles was written based on the GEANT4 9.4 simulation toolkit [7]. The processes of production, propagation, and interaction of baryons (neutrons, protons, short-lived baryons, and their antiparticles), leptons (electrons, positrons, and muons), mesons -- 2 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 (pions and kaons), light nuclei, and gamma rays were taken into account in the calculations. The standard set of processes was used in modeling electromagnetic interactions [8]. Particles of the electron-photon component of secondary cosmic rays with energies lower than 10 MeV were not considered. Photonuclear and electronuclear processes, as well as decay processes, were taken into account in modeling. Low- and high-energy models based on the parametrization of experimental data were used to describe the processes of inelastic hadron scattering by nuclei. The Bertini intranuclear cascade model was used to model the processes of inelastic nucleon and meson scattering by nuclei at energies lower than 6 GeV. A model of the intranuclear binary cascade was used to describe inelastic interactions of light nuclei. The processes of capture of negative mesons and those of neutron capture and nuclear fission were taken into account in the calculations. To describe the interaction between neutrons and nuclei, we used the G4NDL 3.14 package of cross sections. This package includes data from the ENDF-B VI, JENDL, and other data libraries for neutron energies lower than 20 MeV and the JENDL/HE data for energies varying from 20 MeV to 3 GeV. 2.4 Calculation of Particle Fluxes A flux of galactic cosmic ray particles with an energy higher than E through an area of the upper atmospheric boundary is (cid:90) ∞(cid:90) ∞(cid:90) F0i = dΩ cos θ dE(cid:48)J0i(E(cid:48)) = π dE(cid:48)J0i(E(cid:48)) 2π E E where J0i(E) is the directed differential flux of galactic cosmic ray particles of sort i in the near-Earth space and θ is the angle between the particle momentum vector and the direction toward the nadir point. The angular distribution of the number of particles that fall into the atmosphere through the area unit element satisfies the relationship dF0i/d cos θ ∼ cos θ. The omnidirectional differential flux of i particles with energy E in a target at depth z was calculated using the formula: I diff i (E, z) = (cid:88) F0p N0p∆E l (cid:88) l 1 cos θli + k F0α N0α∆E 1 cos θli (3) where the p and α subscripts mean proton and alpha particle, respectively; N0 is the number of particles of primary cosmic rays for which modeling was performed; the summation over l means summation with respect to all i particles that cross the specified z level in a target and have energies in the interval [E − ∆E/2; E + ∆E/2]; θli is the zenith angle of the ith particle; and k = 1.44. Particles with cos θli < 0.001 for atmospheric layers and cos θli < 0.01 for ice were ignored in sum (3). The 1/ cos θ coefficient under the sign of the sum is used to calculate the omnidirectional particle flux. In each case, the number of primary particles, for which numerical simulation was performed, varied from 5 to 10 millions for protons and from 2 to 3 millions for alpha particles. The particle energy was chosen according to differential energy spectrum (1) and (2). Energies from 100 MeV to 1000 GeV for protons and from 100 MeV/nucleon to 1000 GeV/nucleon for alpha particles were considered. The calculations were performed at the Saint Petersburg branch of Joint Supercomputer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. -- 3 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 Figure 1: Our calculations of the omnidirectional differential neutron flux at sea level for the conditions of high geomagnetic latitudes and moderate solar activity (a stepped line). The data from [9] are presented by a dot-and-dash line; the measurements performed by [10], by a solid line with dots; the calculations made by [11], by a dotted curve; the calculations performed by [12], by a dashed line. 3 Results of numerical simulations 3.1 Omnidirectional Differential Flux of Neutrons at Sea Level for the Conditions of Moderate Solar Activity Figure 1 illustrates calculations of the energy dependence of the omnidirectional differential neutron flux at sea level and moderate solar activity. Modulation parameter φ was taken equal to 0.69 GV in the calculations. For comparison, Fig. 1 presents the energy dependences of the differential neutron flux according to the data of the studies [9, 10, 11, 12]. The energy dependence of the differential neutron flux published in [9] resulted from an approximation of the available differential flux measurements. The data correspond to the New York location. The differential flux of neutrons from [10] resulted from a normalization of the measurements in the Northern Hemisphere for high geomagnetic latitudes, moderate solar activity, and sea level according to [10]. The measurement error is caused by the error of cross sections of interactions between high-energy neutrons and the matter that were used to calculate the spectrometer response function. According to [10], the error of the calculated response function values is about 10-15% for neutron energies higher than 150 MeV and is lower for lower neutron energies, producing the measurement error of the same order of magnitude. The omnidirectional differential neutron fluxes obtained in [11] resulted from simulations of cosmic ray propagation in the Earth(cid:48)s atmosphere. In [11], numerical calculations were performed using the GEANT and MCNP program packages. In spite of the fact that we also used the GEANT program package in our calculations, the results of our modeling differ substantially from the data obtained in [11]. The reason of such discrepancy may be in different cross-section data used in both calculations. -- 4 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 In [12], numerical calculations were performed using the PHITS program, JENDL/HE cross sections were used to model the interactions between nucleons and nuclei. The result from [12] presented in Fig. 1 corresponds to the calculations performed ignoring the effect of the Earth(cid:48)s surface. The results of our calculations are in good agreement with the data obtained in [12] for neutron energies higher than 10 MeV. At neutron energies 10-300 MeV, the calculations are in good agreement (within 30%) with the measurements [10]. At neutron energies higher than 400 MeV, the difference between the calculated and experimental differential fluxes is substantial and reaches 200%. A similar difference with the experiment is observed for the calculated differential neutron flux from [12]. One of the possible causes of this difference consists in that the total JENDL/HE cross-sections used in both simulations are overstated at these energies. The difference in the cross-sections of the total interaction in 15% can result in a twofold difference in particle fluxes on five to six free paths. The differential flux of neutrons of secondary cosmic rays near the Earth(cid:48)s surface depends on the landscape and surface matter chemistry. A relatively small amount of hydrogen atoms in soil matter can substantially affect the neutron flux value. Disturbances in the neutron differential flux caused by water in soil decrease with increasing neutron energy: when the neutron energy is 10 MeV, the neutron flux disturbance is no more than 30% [12]. This phenomenon can be one of the causes of the differences between calculated differential fluxes and experimental data [10] at low energies (see Fig. 1). 3.2 Omnidirectional Differential Flux of Neutrons during Periods of Solar Activity Minima and Maxima Figure 2 illustrates the calculated energy dependence of the omnidirectional differential neutron flux for an atmospheric thickness of 660 g/cm2, which corresponds to an altitude of about 3.5 km. The calculation results for cosmic ray modulation parameters of 0.3, 0.69, and 1.2 GV are presented. According to the calculations, the average ratio of the energy spectrum values for the periods of solar activity minima and maxima is about 1.6 for neutron energies reaching several hundred MeV and is smaller for higher energies. It is interesting that the ratio of the neutron monitor count rates during periods of solar activity minima and maxima is about 1.4 for high geomagnetic latitudes and lower atmospheric layers [13]. The difference between the calculated and neutron monitor data can be partially explained by the sensitivity of neutron monitors to the high-energy part of the neutron spectrum and to the cosmic ray muon component. Cascade processes can also result from interactions between atmospheric matter and galactic cosmic rays with higher energies than it follows from nuclear interaction models. As a result, calculations give a larger amplitude of variations in the secondary cosmic ray fluxes. 4 Production of 14C in ice by cosmic ray components 4.1 Production of 14C in ice by nucleons of cosmic rays at high geomagnetic latitudes Reactions of oxygen nuclei spallation by neutrons make the main contribution (98%) to the production of radiocarbon in ice by nucleons of the nuclear-interacting component of cosmic rays [14]. The results of the work [14] were used to calculate the average radiocarbon production rate in polar ice by the nuclear- interacting component of cosmic rays. The main part of radiocarbon (80-90%) is produced in reactions induced by neutrons with energies 30-300 MeV. Based on calculations of the neutron differential flux in the atmosphere presented in the previous section, we can anticipate that the 14C production rate in ice will be lower or higher than the average value by 30% during periods of solar activity maxima or minima, respectively. -- 5 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 Figure 2: Calculations of the omnidirectional differential neutron flux for an atmospheric thickness of 660 g/cm2, for high geomagnetic latitudes, and three values of the solar modulation parameter: 0.3 (the upper curve), 0.69 and 1.2 GV (the lower curve). 4.2 Production of 14C in ice by cosmic ray muons Experimental data on the muon flux in water [15], as well as the data on the reaction cross-sections and the calculation results from [16, 17], were used to calculate the rate of 14C production by muons. The production of the considered cosmogenic nuclide can result from inelastic interactions between high-energy muons and matter nuclei. Muons with energies close to the average muon flux energy mostly contribute to the nuclide production [16]. In ice nuclide is mainly produced by high-energy muons at depths of about ten meters of water equivalent. The average muon energy in matter is about 10 GeV at such depths [16]. According to our calculations, the ratio of omnidirectional fluxes of high-energy muons with energies higher than 5 GeV for periods of solar activity minima and maxima is 1.07 in the lower atmospheric layers. At the end of its motion, a negative muon is trapped onto the outer shell by one ambient atom and descends to a lower atom energy level. Then, the muon either decays into an electron and neutrino or reacts with a nucleus. In the latter case, the nuclear reaction can result in the production of a cosmogenic radionuclide. We consider that muons, the energy of which is lower than the energy of the differential muon flux maximum, i.e., about 0.5 GeV according to [18], are stopping muons. According to our calculations, the ratio of omnidirectional fluxes of low-energy negative muons with energies lower than 0.3 GeV during periods of solar activity minima and maxima is 1.2-1.3 for atmospheric altitudes not higher than 4 km. Fluxes of cosmic ray muons in the atmosphere are less sensitive to a change in the solar activity level than those of nuclear-interacting component particles. -- 6 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 4.3 Production of 14C in Ice at Different Altitudes above Sea Level ray components Qi depending on the glacier height; Qi = (cid:82) ∞ This subsection presents the calculation results of the integral radiocarbon production rate in ice by cosmic 0 Pi(z)dz, where Pi(z) is the radiocarbon production rate in ice by cosmic ray component i at depth z. The value of the integral radiocarbon production rate determines the nuclide concentration in regions where polar ice is accumulated [19]. The cosmogenic radionuclide production rate in ice is proportional to the omnidirectional integral flux of particles near the Earth(cid:48)s surface. According to the results presented in [20, 21], the nuclide production rate by neutrons of cosmic rays in ice at height h above sea level may be presented as (cid:18) 1034 − x (cid:19) Λatm n Qh n = Qs.l. n exp (4) n0 is the nuclide integral production rate in ice at height h above sea level; Qs.l. where Qh n0 is such a rate at sea level; x is the thickness of the atmosphere in g/cm2 above a specified level at height h, and Λatm is the attenuation length of the high-energy neutron integral omnidirectional flux at atmospheric altitudes varying from 0 to h. According to our modeling, the average attenuation length of the high-energy n = 130 ± 0.3, 134 ± 0.3, and neutron omnidirectional flux (neutron energies higher than 10 MeV) is Λatm 138 ± 0.4 g/cm2 at the level of one standard error for minimal, moderate, and maximal solar activity, respectively, and for atmospheric altitudes no higher than 4 km. According to the results presented in [21] for high geomagnetic latitudes and altitudes reaching several kilometers, Λatm n = 130 + 7 - 3 g/cm2, and the variation in the parameter during the 11-year solar cycle is about 4% [22], which confirms the results achieved by us in the present work. n The muon flux attenuation length in the atmosphere is a function of the muon energy. A linear dependence is observed between the attenuation length of a vertical differential muon flux and particle momentum [23]. According to [21], the attenuation length of an omnidirectional flux of negative muons with an energy lower than 0.3 GeV is 230-240 g/cm2 for high geomagnetic latitudes and altitudes reaching several kilometers. According to our calculations, the attenuation length of an omnidirectional flux of low-energy muons is about 250 g/cm2 for atmospheric altitudes not higher than 4 km. The nuclide production rate in reactions of capture of negative muons in ice at height h above sea level is (cid:32) (cid:32) (cid:33) (cid:33) Qh µ− = Qs.l. µ−exp 1034 − x Λatm µ− Qh µf = Qs.l. µf exp 1034 − x Λatm µf where Qh of the omnidirectional flux of stopping muons; in these calculations, Λatm µ− and x have the same meaning as in expression (4) and Λatm µ−, Qs.l. µ− = 240 g/cm2. The nuclide production rate by high-energy muons in ice at height h above sea level is µ− is the attenuation length where Λatm is the attenuation length of the omnidirectional flux of high-energy muons in the atmosphere. µf We assume that the Λatm µf value is equal to the attenuation length of a muon flux with energies of 5- µf ≈ 10 GeV in the atmosphere. According to the results presented in [23] and our calculations, Λatm 1000 g/cm2. Figure 3 presents the dependences of the rate of radiocarbon production by different cosmic ray components in ice on the glacier height at high geomagnetic latitudes and moderate solar activity. The total integral rate of radiocarbon production is also presented here. 5 Conclusions We presented here the simulation results of the propagation of cosmic rays in the Earth(cid:48)s atmosphere for solar activity minima and maxima. We considered data on solar activity in the current epoch. According -- 7 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 Figure 3: Integral rates of 14C production in ice by cosmic ray components in reactions caused by cosmic ray neutrons Qn (solid thin curve) and high-energy muons Qµf (dot-and-dash curve) and in reactions of trapping negative muons Qµ− (dashed curve); total production rate QΣ is represented by a thick solid curve. to the calculations, the ratio of fluxes of high-energy neutrons at minimal and maximal solar activity can reach 1.6 for the near-Earth atmospheric layers. At the same time, this ratio is less than 1.1 for high- energy muons. The contribution of the cosmic ray neutrons to the total integral radiocarbon production rate increases with increasing glacier height and is predominant for heights of more than 2 km. The 14C production rate in ice at high altitudes and high geomagnetic latitudes depends substantially on the solar activity level. Acknoledgements This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (contract no. 11.G34.31.0001 with SPbGPU and G.G. Pavlov, Leading Scientist). References [1] D. Lal, A.J.T. Jull, D. Pollard and L. Vacher, Evidence for Large Century Time-Scale Changes in Solar Activity in the Past 32 kyr, Based on In Situ Cosmogenic 14C in Ice at Summit, Greenland, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2005, vol. 234, pp. 335-349. [2] M.I. Panasyuk, Stranniki Vselennoi Ili Ekho Bol(cid:48)Shogo Vzryva (Wanderers of the Universe or the Echo of Large Explosion), Fryazino: Vek 2, 2005. -- 8 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 [3] L.J. Gleeson and W.I. Axford, Solar Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays, Astrophys. J., 1968, vol. 154, pp. 1011-1026. [4] I.G. Usoskin, K. Alanko-Huotari, G.A. Kovaltsov and K. Mursula, Heliospheric Modulation of Cosmic Rays: Monthly Reconstruction for 1951-2004, J. Geophys. Res., 2005, vol. 110A, p. A12108. [5] B. Wiebel-Sooth, P.L. Biermann and H. Meyer, Cosmic Rays. VII. Individual Element Spectra: Pre- diction and Data, Astron. Astrophys., 1998, vol. 330, pp. 389-398. [6] http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/view/badc.nerc.ac.uk ATOM dataent CIRA. [7] S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako et al., Geant4: A Simulation Toolkit, Nuclear Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 2003, vol. 506, pp. 250-303. [8] http://geant4.cern.ch/support/index.shtml. [9] J.F. Ziegler, Terrestrial Cosmic Ray Intensities, IBM J. Res. Development, 1998, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 117-139. [10] M.S. Gordon, P. Goldhagen, K.P. Rodbell, T.H. Zabel, H.H.K. Tang, J.M. Clem and P. Bailey, Measurement of the Flux and Energy Spectrum of Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons on the Ground, IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci., 2004, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 3427-3434. [11] J. Masarik and J. Beer, An Updated Simulation of Particle Fluxes and Cosmogenic Nuclide Produc- tion in the Earth(cid:48)s Atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114D, p. D11103. [12] T. Sato and K. Niita, Analytical Functions to Predict Cosmic-Ray Neutron Spectra in the Atmo- sphere, Radiat. Res., 2006, vol. 166, pp. 544-555. [13] http://cr0.izmiran.rssi.ru/common/links.htm [14] A.V. Nesterenok and V.O. Naidenov, In Situ Formation of Cosmogenic 14C by Cosmic Ray Nucleons in Polar Ice, Nuclear Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B, 2012, vol. 270, pp. 12-18. [15] I.W. Rogers and M. Tristam, The Absolute Depth-Intensity Curve for Cosmic-Ray Muons Underwa- ter and the Integral Sea-Level Momentum Spectrum in the Range 1-100 GeV/c, J. Phys. G: Nuclear Phys., 1984, vol. 10, pp. 983-1001. [16] B. Heisinger, D. Lal, A.J.T. Jull, P. Kubik, S. Ivy-Ochs, S. Neumaier, K. Knie, V. Lazarev and E. Nolte, Production of Selected Cosmogenic Radionuclides by Muons. 1. Fast Muons, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2002, vol. 200, pp. 345-355. [17] B. Heisinger, D. Lal, A.J.T. Jull, P. Kubik, S. Ivy-Ochs, K. Knie and E. Nolte, Production of Selected Cosmogenic Radionuclides by Muons: 2. Capture of Negative Muons, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2002b, vol. 200, pp. 357-369. [18] M. Boezio, V. Bonvicini, P. Schiavon et al., Energy Spectra of Atmospheric Muons Measured with the CAPRICE98 Balloon Experiment, Phys. Rev. D, 2003, vol. 67, p. 072003. [19] A.V. Nesterenok and V.O. Naidenov, Radiocarbon in the Antarctic Ice: The Formation of the Cosmic Ray Muon Component at Large Depths, Geomagn. Aeron., 2010, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 138-144 [Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. transl.), 2010, vol. 50, p. 134]. [20] T.J. Dunai, Scaling Factors for Production Rates of in Situ Produced Cosmogenic Nuclides: A Critical Reevaluation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2000, vol. 176, pp. 157-169. -- 9 -- Published in Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2012, Vol.52, No.8 [21] D. Desilets and M. Zreda, Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Secondary Cosmic-Ray Nucleon Intensities and Applications to In Situ Cosmogenic Dating, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2003, vol. 206, pp. 21-42. [22] B.C. Raubenheimer and P.H. Stoker, Various Aspects of the Attenuation Coefficient of a Neutron Monitor, J. Geophys. Res., 1974, vol. 79, pp. 5069-5076. [23] M. Boezio, P. Carlson, T. Franke et al., Measurement of the Flux of Atmospheric Muons with the CAPRICE94 Apparatus, Phys. Rev. D, 2000, vol. 62, p. 032007. -- 10 --
1208.2795	1	1208	2012-08-14T07:45:57	The influence of forward-scattered light in transmission measurements of (exo)planetary atmospheres	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	[Abridged] The transmission of light through a planetary atmosphere can be studied as a function of altitude and wavelength using stellar or solar occultations, giving often unique constraints on the atmospheric composition. For exoplanets, a transit yields a limb-integrated, wavelength-dependent transmission spectrum of an atmosphere. When scattering haze and/or cloud particles are present in the planetary atmosphere, the amount of transmitted flux not only depends on the total optical thickness of the slant light path that is probed, but also on the amount of forward-scattering by the scattering particles. Here, we present results of calculations with a three-dimensional Monte Carlo code that simulates the transmitted flux during occultations or transits. For isotropically scattering particles, like gas molecules, the transmitted flux appears to be well-described by the total atmospheric optical thickness. Strongly forward-scattering particles, however, such as commonly found in atmospheres of Solar System planets, can increase the transmitted flux significantly. For exoplanets, such added flux can decrease the apparent radius of the planet by several scale heights, which is comparable to predicted and measured features in exoplanet transit spectra. We performed detailed calculations for Titan's atmosphere between 2.0 and 2.8 micron and show that haze and gas abundances will be underestimated by about 8% if forward-scattering is ignored in the retrievals. At shorter wavelengths, errors in the gas and haze abundances and in the spectral slope of the haze particles can be several tens of percent, also for other Solar System planetary atmospheres. We also find that the contribution of forward-scattering can be fairly well described by modelling the atmosphere as a plane-parallel slab.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The influence of forward-scattered light in transmission measurements of (exo)planetary atmospheres R.J. de Kok a, and D.M. Stam a aSRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, the Netherlands ArticleinpreparationforsubmissiontoIcarus 27June2018 Proposed Running Head: Light scattering in planet transmission measurements Please send Editorial Correspondence to: Remco de Kok SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Sorbonnelaan 2 3584 CA Utrecht The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Phone: +31 887775725 Fax: +31 887775601 2 ABSTRACT The transmission of light through a planetary atmosphere can be studied as a func- tion of altitude and wavelength using stellar or solar occultations, giving often unique constraints on the atmospheric composition. For exoplanets, a transit yields a limb-integrated, wavelength-dependent transmission spectrum of an atmosphere. When scattering haze and/or cloud particles are present in the planetary atmo- sphere, the amount of transmitted flux not only depends on the total optical thick- ness of the slant light path that is probed, but also on the amount of forward- scattering by the scattering particles. Here, we present results of calculations with a three-dimensional Monte Carlo code that simulates the transmitted flux during occultations or transits. For isotropically scattering particles, like gas molecules, the transmitted flux appears to be well-described by the total atmospheric opti- cal thickness. Strongly forward-scattering particles, however, such as commonly found in atmospheres of Solar System planets, can increase the transmitted flux significantly. For exoplanets, such added flux can decrease the apparent radius of the planet by several scale heights, which is comparable to predicted and measured features in exoplanet transit spectra. We performed detailed calculations for Titan's atmosphere between 2.0 and 2.8 µm and show that haze and gas abundances will be underestimated by about 8% if forward-scattering is ignored in the retrievals. At shorter wavelengths, errors in the gas and haze abundances and in the spectral slope of the haze particles can be several tens of percent, also for other Solar Sys- tem planetary atmospheres. We also find that the contribution of forward-scattering can be fairly well described by modelling the atmosphere as a plane-parallel slab. This potentially reduces the need for a full three-dimensional Monte Carlo code for calculating transmission spectra of atmospheres that contain forward-scattering particles. Keywords: atmospheres, composition ; extra-solar planets ; Titan, atmosphere ; ra- diative transfer 3 1 Introduction Planetary atmospheres can be studied remotely using spectroscopy of the light that is reflected or the radiation that is emitted by the planet. Another method for study- ing planetary atmospheres is to measure the light of a bright source, such as a star or the Sun, as it is attenuated by (part of) the atmosphere. For Solar System objects, such transmission measurements are performed during stellar or solar occultations, when the planetary limb is in between the light source and the spacecraft or tele- scope. One advantage of transmission measurements is that the light source is often very bright, enabling high signal-to-noise measurements. Another advantage is that transmission measurements allow sampling of long path lengths through the at- mosphere, since the light travels through the curved limb of the planet. Long path lengths increase the sensitivity to e.g. trace gases with very small concentrations. Furthermore, altitudes in an atmosphere can be probed with a high vertical resolu- tion, as only a very limited altitude range is probed by a single observation com- pared to e.g. on-disc observations, and many altitudes can be sampled due to the high signal-to-noise. Also, occultation measurements rely on relative changes in the measured signal, and not on absolute signal levels, and are hence 'self-calibrating' and less dependent on instrument drifts. As a result of these advantages, transmis- sion measurements are very suitable for retrieving vertical profiles of trace gases. Disadvantages of solar and/or stellar occultations are that they require very spe- cial observing geometries, making it not trivial to target specific places on the planet. Furthermore, only a single location on the planet can be studied simulta- neously, and the long path lengths prevent probing the lower, thicker layers of a planetary atmosphere. For solar occultations, the atmosphere can naturally only be studied at local twilight conditions. In recent years there have been many oc- cultation measurements of Solar System planets. Besides the Earth, occultation transmission measurements have been performed of Venus (e.g. Vandaele et al., 2008; Fedorova et al., 2008; Belyaev et al., 2012), Mars (e.g. Blamont et al., 1989; Krasnopol'Skii et al., 1989; Forget et al., 2009), Jupiter (Formisano et al., 2003), Saturn (Kim et al., 2012), Titan (Bellucci et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2011), and Pluto (Hubbard et al., 1988; Elliot et al., 2003), for which more are planned (Stern et al., 2008). Besides measuring the atmospheric transmission, occultations can also be used to measure the atmospheric refraction, which we will not consider here. Transmission measurements are one of the most valuable probes of the atmospheres of extrasolar planets (exoplanets). The transmission of an exoplanetary atmosphere can be measured when the orbit of the exoplanet with respect to the observer is such that the planet crosses the disc of its host star. By accurately measuring the wavelength-dependence of the decrease of star light during such a transit, a trans- mission spectrum of the planetary atmosphere can be derived (Seager and Sasselov, 2000; Brown, 2001; Hubbard et al., 2001), although only the day-night boundary can be probed. These transit measurements have revolutionised our knowledge of exoplanet atmospheres and are now widely used to derive atmospheric properties of 4 a number of transiting exoplanets. There are now several planets for which molec- ular absorption features have been identified through measuring their transits (e.g. Charbonneau et al., 2002; Tinetti et al., 2007; Snellen et al., 2010; Seager and Deming, 2010), as well as molecular and haze Rayleigh scattering (e.g. Lecavelier Des Etangs et al., 2008; Pont et al., 2008; Sing et al., 2011). Also, there is an indication of high wind speeds on the planet HD 209458b (Snellen et al., 2010). The smallest planet for which there have been significant transit measurements is the 'super-Earth' GJ 1214b (Charbonneau et al., 2009). Transit measurements allow the determination of the bulk composition of this planet (Miller-Ricci and Fortney, 2010), but at present it is not clear whether it is has a water vapour atmosphere, or a hydrogen atmosphere with clouds (Bean et al., 2010, 2011; Croll et al., 2011; de Mooij et al., 2012). Un- fortunately, atmospheres with high molecular weight, like Earth, are hard to charac- terise in this way, as the spectral features are much reduced compared to hydrogen atmospheres. This is because the scale height of the atmosphere scales with the molecular weight. The transmission of a planetary atmosphere is mainly determined by the extinc- tion or total optical thickness of gases and particles, like haze and cloud particles, measured along the line of sight. The total optical thickness τt can be split into an absorbing part, τa, and a scattering part, τs, using the single-scattering albedo ω of the mixture of gases and particles in the layer: τt = ωτt + (1 − ω)τt = τs + τa. (1) The optical thicknesses τt, τa, and τs and the single scattering albedo ω are usually wavelength dependent. If the transmission T , i.e. the ratio of transmitted to incident flux, is purely de- termined by the extinction along the line of sight, it is simply given by the Beer- Lambert law: T = e−τt (2) If the scattering optical thickness τs along the line of sight is larger than zero, how- ever, a fraction of the light that has been scattered out of the incident beam of light, will be scattered in exactly the forward direction after a single scattering or after multiple scattering events. This means that more light reaches the observer than ex- pected from the extinction optical thickness of the atmosphere alone. In fact, large particles scatter light predominantly in the forward direction because of diffraction (see e.g. Hansen and Travis, 1974), possibly making the forward-scattered light contribute significantly to the total transmitted flux. Indeed, non-absorbing, per- fectly forward-scattering particles would appear completely transparent in trans- mission, despite a non-zero optical thickness. How a particle scatters the incident flux as a function of the scattering angle Θ 5 is described by the phase function P (Θ). Figure 1 shows the single-scattering albedo ω and the phase function in the forward direction, P (0), of some parti- cles found in atmospheres of Solar System planets. The phase functions have been normalised such that their integral over 4π steradians is unity. We show measured as well as calculated values of P (0). The properties of Titan aerosol and mar- tian dust particles are derived from measurements by Tomasko et al. (2008) and Tomasko et al. (1999), respectively. The lines in Fig. 1 are computed using Mie- theory (de Rooij and van der Stap, 1984). Note that the strength of the forward- scattering part of the phase function is due to diffraction and as such depends mostly on the size of the particles, and less on their shape (e.g. Mishchenko et al., 1996). Hence, Mie scattering should be accurate for the purpose of estimating the forward-scattering peak. For the Venus cloud particles, we used the optical con- stants of Palmer and Williams (1975) and the size distributions for the two most dominant size modes from Grinspoon et al. (1993). For the calculations for mar- tian dust and ice cloud particles we used the optical parameters and size distribu- tions as described by Kleinbohl et al. (2009). It can be seen that especially at short wavelengths P (0), and hence the forward-scattering contribution to the transmis- sion, can potentially be large, even though all these different particles are relatively small (with effective radii smaller than 2 µm). The forward-scattering part of the phase function of larger particles, such as liquid water cloud particles found on Earth, can be much larger (see e.g. Fig. 11.13.6 in Mishchenko et al., 2006). l o d e b a g n i r e t t a c s - e g n S l i 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1000 100 10 ) 0 ( P 1 0 Venus mode 1 Venus mode 2 Mars dust Mars ice Titan aerosol Mars dust 1 1 2 3 Wavelength (micron) 2 3 Wavelength (micron) 4 5 4 5 Fig. 1. Single-scattering albedos ω and phase functions in the forward direction, P (0), of particles present in the atmospheres of Venus, Mars and Titan (see the text for details). Analysing transmission measurements using Eq. 2 and thus ignoring the (poten- tial) contribution of forward-scattered flux to the transmission, which is how these measurements are usually analysed, will result in an error in the retrieved optical 6 thickness of the planetary atmosphere. In this paper, we explore the contribution of the forward-scattered flux to the transmission signal using a three-dimensional Monte Carlo model, which simulates scattered light in a spherical, stratified atmo- sphere. Besides providing general results, we will also present more detailed results for Titan's atmosphere, to serve as a practical example. Finally, we draw conclu- sions regarding possible errors in retrievals from transmission measurements when scattering particles are present. 2 Numerical model Our model is a Monte Carlo model, whose core is based on subroutines of the mc-unik code by Andreas Macke (pers. comm.; Macke et al., 1999; Cahalan et al., 2005). In a Monte Carlo model, the light that is incident on the planetary atmo- sphere is described by a large number of separate photons, the paths of which are followed through the atmosphere. In our model, photons are fired through the at- mosphere from one side and in one direction, and their locations and directions when they leave the atmosphere (provided they have not been absorbed) are stored. We ignore refraction and polarisation. Refraction will generally increase the path length through the atmosphere, but its effect at low pressures has been found to be small by Hubbard et al. (2001) and Bellucci et al. (2009). A model atmosphere is assumed to be spherically symmetric and is described by an arbitrary number of shells. In our calculations, the thickness of each atmospheric shell is roughly a sixth of the atmospheric scale height. We did not try to find the optimum for this thickness, but halving the number of layers did not significantly change our scat- tering results. Also considering our simulations with a single layer, which show that the spherical geometry is not important to first order for the scattering con- tribution (see Sections 3 and 4), we do not expect large errors in the scattering contribution due to our finite number of layers (of the order of 50). When analysing real measurements, more layers might be needed, depening on the required model accuracy. Across each atmospheric shell, the temperature, pressure, gas and parti- cle concentrations and their optical properties are assumed to be constant. In the results presented below, we always have only one type of scatterer present in the atmosphere. The atmosphere is bounded below by a black surface at a pressure of 5 bar. Generally, the slant optical thickness of a light path crossing the 5 bar level is of the order of 100 or more and hence the light emanating from this level has a negligible contribution to the transmitted signal. When a photon enters an atmospheric shell (either the outer or an inner shell, and either from the outside or the inside), the free path length l∗ of the photon in the shell is calculated using: l∗ = τ ∗ t dl dτt , (3) 7 where τ ∗ t follows from e−τ ∗ t = ξ, (4) with ξ a random number between 0 and 1. Within each shell in our atmosphere, dτt/dl is constant. If the free path length and the direction of the photon are such that the photon passes through the shell without being intercepted by a gas molecule or a particle, we stop the photon where it would leave the inner or outer boundary of the atmospheric shell. If the photon is leaving the outer atmospheric shell towards space, its location and direction of propagation are stored and a new photon is fired. If the photon is about to enter another atmospheric shell, we calculate the photon's free path length in the new shell and let it continue its path in the new shell. If the free path length and the direction of a photon in an atmospheric shell are such that the photon is intercepted by a gas molecule or a particle in the same shell, we calculate whether the photon is absorbed or scattered, based on the single-scattering albedo ω of the mixture of gas molecules and particles in the shell. If the photon is absorbed, it is lost and a new photon is fired. If the photon is scattered, its direction changes according to the phase function P of the mixture of gas molecules and particles in the shell. The photon's scattering angle Θ∗, and hence its new direction, is determined by the cumulative distribution of the phase function as follows: Θ∗ Z 0 P (Θ∗)dΘ∗ = ξ π Z 0 P (Θ)dΘ, (5) with ξ a random number between 0 and 1. For this new direction, a new free path length l∗ is calculated and the photon is sent on its way. A photon reaching the surface below the atmosphere is assumed to be absorbed. So, all photons are either absorbed or leave the top of the atmosphere. Figure 2 shows a sketch of the geometries involved for photons fired at a tangent altitude h. The figure includes sample trajectories of photons calculated using our Monte Carlo model. For exoplanets, illumination from all values of h, reaching from the bottom to the top of the atmosphere, has to be taken into account. In our model, we find that the contribution of photons exiting at a different tangent altitude from where the photons are inserted, in exactly the right direction, is negligible. We have tested our Monte Carlo code using an atmosphere consisting of a plane- parallel slab, for which several accurate codes for calculating scattered fluxes exist. We compared our calculations of the total transmitted flux and the flux transmitted in a specific direction for isotropic scattering with Shettle and Weinman (1970) and de Haan et al. (1987) (ignoring polarisation), and for non-isotropic scattering with 8 Fig. 2. Illustration of the geometries. The illumination source is on the left side of the planet, and the observer on the right side. Photons are fired in a single direction on the left, indicated by the arrow on the left. The observer measures the photons that leave the atmosphere in the direction of the arrow on the right. The solid lines indicate the top and bottom of the atmosphere in the plane of the emission and observer and the tangent altitude of the observation is denoted by h. Apparent penetration of the rays at the bottom of the atmosphere is caused by the rays moving in the dimension perpendicular to the figure. de Haan et al. (1987) and Hovenier and de Haan (1985). In all cases, the results agree to within a percent. We have also tested our code assuming a spherical shell model atmosphere containing only purely absorbing particles. For such an atmo- sphere, the number of photons transmitted through the atmosphere, divided by the total number of fired photons, should simply equal the transmission T as described by Eq. 2, which indeed it does to well within a percent. Hence, our sampling of the mean free paths is also accurate in the three-dimensional model. For every tangent altitude h, we fire a number of photons that is equal to 105 divided by the transmission derived from the total optical thickness along the line-of-sight (Eq. 2), to ensure that enough photons survive their trip through the atmosphere to have relatively accurate results. Afterwards, we normalize the number of surviving photons to the number of incident photons for each tangent altitude h. We impose a maximum number of photons of 108 for large optical thicknesses, to keep the computation time manageable. This means that, for large optical depths, less than 105 photons are transmitted and the accuracy of the result decreases. 3 Scattering results and application to exoplanets We have performed calculations of the flux that is transmitted through a plane- tary atmosphere and that is detected at the other side, with the transmitted photons travelling in the same direction as the incident ones. In this section, we consider three model atmospheres that differ in the type of scattering particles: Rayleigh scattering particles, and two types of forward-scattering particles, with different forward-scattering strengths. As briefly discussed in the introduction, one would 9 qualitatively expect more photons to reach the observer if scattering is included, with more forward-scattering particles giving a larger added signal. In each model atmosphere, the particles are uniformly mixed throughout the atmosphere in hy- drostatic equilibrium and they are the only opacity source. The three model at- mospheres have the same extinction optical thickness, and are based on the 'hot Jupiter' HD 189733b, for which Rayleigh-scattering particles have been identified in the atmosphere (Pont et al., 2008; Sing et al., 2011). Although we present here only the results with parameters from one specific atmosphere, it will be clear later that these results are also valid for other planets. A uniform temperature of 1000 K and a mean molecular weight of 2.2 gram/mol is assumed, with a gravitational acceleration of 18 m/s2. The forward-scattering particles have Henyey-Greenstein phase functions (Henyey and Greenstein, 1941), given by P (Θ) = 1 4π (1 + g2 1 − g2 − 2g cos Θ)3/2 , (6) with g the asymmetry parameter. For one type of particles, we chose g = 0.9, which represents a case of moderate forward scattering, with P (0) = 15.1 (cf. Fig. 1). The other type of particles is more forward-scattering, with g = 0.98, corresponding to P (0) = 393.8. All particles are assumed to be non-absorbing, with single-scattering albedos equal to unity. Figure 3 shows the transmitted flux for different tangent heights h (see Fig. 2), plot- ted as a function of the total optical thickness along the line of sight for the three model atmospheres. In the case of Rayleigh scattering particles, only very little extra flux is transmitted as a result of the forward-scattering and the total transmit- ted flux can be well described by Eq. 2. Indeed, adding the forward-scattered flux to the transmission changes the transmitted flux by less than a percent (relatively speaking, so not in percentage points; i.e. a 1% change of a transmission of 20% gives 19.8% here, not 19%) for optical thicknesses less than unity, and by a few percent for optical thicknesses around 10. In the cases with the forward-scattering particles, however, the forward-scattering adds significantly to the transmitted flux as expected based on extinction alone (see Eq. 2 and the line for g = 0.0 in Fig. 3). Especially at large optical thicknesses, these scattering particles can yield a trans- mitted flux that is several times the flux that would be transmitted if the particles were purely absorbing. For g = 0.98 this is most apparent, but also for g = 0.9 this is the case for very low transmission values, which are not well visible in the fig- ure. These results confirm our qualitative expectations, as noted in the introduction, but now the magnitude of the effect is made apparent. In terms of absolute number of photons, optical thicknesses around unity give the largest differences between forward-scattering and purely absorbing particles. From our code, we also know the number of times a photon is scattered before it exits the atmosphere at the top or the bottom. As expected, for small optical thicknesses, the additional scattering 10 contribution comes mostly from photons that are scattered only once, whereas for large optical thicknesses multiple scattering is more important. 100 80 60 40 20 ) % ( t h g i l d e t i m s n a r T 0 0.01 g=0.0 g=0.9 g=0.98 0.10 1.00 Optical depth 10.00 Fig. 3. The transmitted flux as a function of the slant optical thickness through the atmo- sphere for isotropically scattering particles (g = 0.0) and two types of Henyey-Greenstein scattering particles (g = 0.9 and g = 0.98). The line for isotropically scattering particles is practically indistinguishable from a line (not shown) representing transmission without added forward-scattering scattering (Eq. 2). To simulate the transmission for transiting exoplanets, the transmitted flux must be integrated along the planetary limb that is in front of the star. By measuring the transmitted flux at a given wavelength, one can determine the apparent radius of the planet at that wavelength (e.g. Brown, 2001). Our calculations show that the apparent radius of exoplanet HD 189733b with an atmosphere filled with forward- scattering particles, decreases 0.7% and 3.8% for g = 0.9 and g = 0.98, respec- tively. This corresponds to roughly 1 and 4 times the atmospheric scale height and a decrease in transit depth of 0.03 and 0.15 percentage points (from an initial 2% tran- sit depth). Such differences are easily comparable to the depth of spectral features in the transit spectrum, and to differences in measured transit depth (e.g. Sing et al., 2011). For other exoplanets, the number in terms of scale height will be similar, as we found by changing gravity. We also compared our Monte Carlo results with calculations of light passing through a plane-parallel slab (de Haan et al., 1987) with the same scattering particles and the same total optical thickness as the light path in the three-dimensional, spheri- cal atmosphere. For all tangent heights and corresponding optical thicknesses, the relative difference between the flux transmitted through the three-dimensional at- mosphere and that transmitted through the plane-parallel slab calculations is less 11 than 10%, meaning that plane-parallel slab calculations (e.g. Hubbard et al., 2001) can describe the effects of forward-scattering particles fairly well. This is perhaps not surprising, since by far the largest optical thickness along the line of sight is located at a relatively small region in the atmosphere, around the tangent point, for each (almost) parallel beam that is passing through the atmosphere, from the star to the observer. The outcome of this last test suggests that the exact geometry is not important to first order, which means that Fig. 3 is valid for all different kinds of atmospheres, if there is no absorption. Different atmospheres will then only differ in the amount of slant optical thickness as a function of height and wavelength. The case when there is also absorption by e.g. gases present is illustrated in the next section. 4 Application to Titan To further explore the effect that scattering haze and/or cloud particles have on transmitted fluxes and the atmospheric information derived from transmission mea- surements, we take Titan's atmosphere as example, for which a sequence of near- infrared solar occultation measurements by Cassini VIMS were analysed by Bellucci et al. (2009). The presence of gas absorption bands makes this case more complex. Again, we expect scattering from the haze to increase the amount of observed photons. In gas absorption bands this effect is expected to be less important, but it is not directly apparent what the magnitude of the effect is and what effect the scattering will have on retrieved gas abundances. Bellucci et al. (2009) derive the optical thickness and spectral slope of Titan's haze and gas abundances, all as functions of altitude, from these observations at a single location. Here, we do not attempt to fit the VIMS data, but instead simulate transmission spectra using our Monte Carlo code and fully in- cluding forward-scattering particles. From these simulated spectra, we then derive gas and haze properties ignoring scattering, like Bellucci et al. (2009) do. We then compare the retrieved atmospheric parameters with the 'real' parameters that we put into our code to quantify potential errors in retrievals when forward-scattering is ignored. For Titan's atmosphere we calculated transmission spectra between 2.0 and 2.8 µm with a spectral resolution of 16.6 nm (Brown et al., 2004) using the correlated- k method (Lacis and Oinas, 1991) and CH4 line parameters from HITRAN 2008 (Rothman et al., 2009). Opacity distribution tables are calculated for the ranges of temperatures and pressures relevant for Titan's atmosphere. Since we are investi- gating the effects of ignoring forward-scattering and because we are not fitting real measurements, we don't have to be concerned about potential errors in the gas ab- sorption coefficients due to the low temperatures in Titan's atmosphere; we use the same gas absorption properties in the calculations that include forward-scattering as in the calculations that ignore this scattering. Similarly, we are not concerned about 12 small errors expected from the correlated-k approximation, especially since by far the most opacity along the light path crossing the atmosphere is located in a sin- gle atmospheric layer, whose altitude is the tangent height. Potentially uncorrelated k-distributions at different altitudes will therefore have little effect. We assumed a pressure-temperature profile from Vinatier et al. (2006) and a uniform CH4 Volume Mixing Ratio (VMR) of 1.4% (Niemann et al., 2005). The haze optical thickness as a function of altitude at 2 µm was taken from Bellucci et al. (2009) and the spectral slope of the haze is taken to be that of the upper haze of Tomasko et al. (2008). The single-scattering albedo of the haze particles as a function of wavelength was linearly extrapolated from Tomasko et al. (2008) and the phase functions were lin- early interpolated from the phase functions tabulated by Tomasko et al. (2008) (see Fig. 1). For our Monte Carlo calculations we took into account the distance of the spacecraft to Titan (Bellucci et al., 2009) as well as the VIMS telescope dimensions (Brown et al., 2004) to collect all of the 'observed' photons. How the photons are imaged after hitting the primary mirror is not taken into account, but this is ex- pected to have very little influence, because by far the largest contribution of the signal comes from the direction of the Sun. Figure 4 shows calculated transmission spectra with and without including the forward-scattering contribution for different observer's tangent altitudes. This part of the spectra shows a CH4 absorption feature and Bellucci et al. (2009) derive the CH4 VMR from this part of the spectrum (cf. their Fig. 7). From our figure, it is clear that the contribution of forward-scattering by the haze particles is largest in the continuum, where there is little gas absorption, as expected. The added contribution of forward-scattering to the continuum flux makes the absorption features deeper with respect to the continuum. It also slightly flattens the slope of the continuum flux, because the haze particles are more forward-scattering at smaller wavelengths than at larger wavelengths. We derived the atmospheric parameters by fitting the transmission spectra that we calculated using the Monte Carlo code, which includes scattering. These spectra (dashed lines in Fig. 4) are thus thought of as the 'real' measurements that need fit- ting. For the fitting, we ignored the scattering, and used just Eq. 2, similar to what Bellucci et al. (2009) do. The retrieved atmospheric parameters can then be com- pared to the 'real' state of the atmosphere, as input in our scattering model. We first scaled the amount of haze particles and the spectral slope (the Angstrom exponent) of the haze to exactly match the beginning (2 µm) and end (2.8 µm) of the trans- mission spectra. Compared to the 'real' values that we used in the calculation of the transmission spectra, ignoring the forward-scattering in the fit scales down the density of haze particles by typically 8% and the Angstrom exponent by 3%. Then, we used a least-squares fit to determine the CH4 VMR. Figure 6 shows the retrieved CH4 VMR as a function of altitude together with the 'real' VMR. The noise on the retrieved values is the result of the limited number of photons used in the Monte Carlo calculations. The decrease of the error in the retrieved VMR with altitude above about 200 km, corresponds with the decrease of the difference between the 13 i i n o s s m s n a r T i i n o s s m s n a r T 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2.0 119 km 164 km 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 i i n o s s m s n a r T 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.0 Wavelength (micron) 2.2 2.4 2.6 Wavelength (micron) 223 km 288 km 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 i i n o s s m s n a r T 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.0 Wavelength (micron) 2.2 2.4 2.6 Wavelength (micron) 2.8 2.8 Fig. 4. Calculated transmission spectra with (dashed lines) and without (solid lines) for- ward-scattering for Titan's atmosphere, for four different observed tangent altitudes (see Fig. 2.) transmission spectra in Fig. 4. Figure 6 shows that in this case, ignoring forward- scattering when retrieving the gas abundance can lead to an underestimation of the gas VMR of typically 8%. The reason for the underestimation is that ignoring the added continuum flux that is due to forward-scattering leads to a lower retrieved haze particle density (since more flux is transmitted in the continuum). It is not straightforward to argue what effect this will have on the depth of the absorption band compared to the 'real' spec- trum, since the scattering contribution to the transmitted signal is not related to the optical depth in a simple way as the non-scattering signal (Eq. 2) is. The outcome of lowering the haze opacity in the non-scattering case is illustrated in Fig. 5. The dotted line shows the fit when the haze is scaled down, but the methane abundance is kept identical. The apparent increase in depth of the absorption band between the solid (no forward scattering) and dashed (with forward scattering) spectra corre- sponds simply to an almost uniform lowering of the optical depth with wavelength, giving rise to a non-uniform increase in transmission according to Eq. 2. However, whether this increase of band depth is more or less than the increase of band depth obtained from the scattering contribution in the dashed spectrum is not immediately clear. It can be seen from Fig. 5 that in our calculations, the absorption band is too deep for the non-scattering case (dotted line) and the CH4 abundance should be decreased to fit the dashed line. Surprisingly perhaps, ignoring forward-scattering thus leads to an underestimation of both the gas and the haze abundances if mea- surements are fitted. It is therefore all the more puzzling that Bellucci et al. (2009) 14 find a CH4 abundance that is significantly larger than that measured by the Huygens probe (Niemann et al., 2005) below 200 km. Bellucci et al. (2009) suggest various possible explanations for this effect, such as extra absorption within the haze itself. i i n o s s m s n a r T 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 2.5 119 km 2.6 2.7 Wavelength (micron) 2.8 Fig. 5. A zoom of a spectrum with dashed and solid lines as in Fig. 4. The dotted line now shows the absorption-only fit to the spectrum when the haze opacity and its spectral slope is decreased, but the methane abundance is kept identical. As we did for the exoplanet calculation (see Section 3), we compared the trans- mission spectra as calculated with our Monte Carlo code and assuming a spherical model atmosphere with spectra calculated assuming a plane-parallel slab model at- mosphere with the same particle scattering properties, weighted by the slant optical thickness of each atmospheric layer, and the same optical thickness (as measured along a slant light path for a given tangent altitude). The differences between the spherical atmosphere spectra and the plane-parallel slab spectra are small: of the order of a few percent in the transmitted flux. 5 Conclusions and discussion We have developed a three-dimensional, spherical Monte Carlo code to simulate the added contribution of scattered light to the flux that is transmitted through a planetary atmosphere during stellar or solar occultations and exoplanet transits. Our calculations with parameters of the exoplanet HD 189733b show that Rayleigh scattering does not add significantly to the transmitted flux that one would expect when the transmission depended solely on the extinction (absorption plus scatter- ing) optical thickness of the atmosphere. However, forward-scattering particles can 15 500 400 ) m k ( e d u t i t l A 300 200 100 0 1.2 1.3 1.4 Retrieved CH4 VMR (%) 1.5 Fig. 6. The CH4 VMR as retrieved while ignoring forward-scattering by the haze particles (solid line). The vertical dashed line indicates the 'real' VMR value that we used as input for our spectral calculations, which included forward-scattering. contribute significantly to the transmitted flux. For (slant) optical thicknesses larger than unity, the added contribution of forward-scattered flux can be as large or larger than the flux expected from the extinction alone. For exoplanet transits, this means that the magnitude of a transit of a planet with forward-scattering particles in its atmosphere can be several percent smaller than predicted when these particles are assumed to be fully absorbing. Such a difference in transit depth is easily com- parable to the magnitude of measured and predicted spectral features in a transit spectrum. With our Monte Carlo code, we performed detailed calculations of occultation spectra of Titan's atmosphere between 2.0 and 2.8 µm and show that the haze abundance and trace gas mixing ratios are underestimated by ∼ 8% if the forward- scattering contribution to the transmitted flux is ignored in the retrieval algorithm. Also in such a case, the derived spectral slope of the haze particles is underes- timated by a few percent. Figure 1 shows that Titan's haze particles are fairly forward-scattering between 2 and 3µm, but that cloud and haze particles can be at least an order of magnitude more forward-scattering at shorter wavelengths. This means that at shorter wavelengths, cloud, haze or gas abundances could be under- estimated by several tens of percent if forward-scattering is ignored. Figure 1 also shows that such strong forward-scattering is not uncommon in other atmospheres in the Solar System. Also the change of forward-scattering with wavelength can be much stronger at shorter wavelength, resulting in much larger errors in the derived spectral slope of forward-scattering particles for absorption-only models. Similarly, 16 fast changes of the single-scattering albedo with wavelength can also cause signif- icant errors in the derived spectral slope of cloud and haze particles. We also compared our Monte Carlo calculations for three-dimensional, spherical planetary atmospheres to calculations for atmospheres composed of plane-parallel slabs, with the same optical thickness as the slant light paths through the spherical atmosphere, and with scattering properties weighted by the slant optical thickness of each atmospheric layer (see e.g. Hubbard et al. (2001); Kim et al. (2011) for ex- amples). For the cases we considered, we found these two calculations to match within 10% for optical thicknesses less than 10. This has the implication that the contribution of forward-scattered light to transmitted fluxes can be fairly well mod- elled using a plane-parallel assumption, for which radiative transfer routines are available that are much faster than a three-dimensional Monte Carlo code. Acknowledgements We acknowledge financial support by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). We thank Andreas Macke for use of part of his code. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and useful suggestions. 17 References Bean, J. L., D´esert, J.-M., Kabath, P., Stalder, B., Seager, S., Miller-Ricci Kemp- ton, E., Berta, Z. K., Homeier, D., Walsh, S., Seifahrt, A., 2011. The Optical and Near-infrared Transmission Spectrum of the Super-Earth GJ 1214b: Further Evidence for a Metal-rich Atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 743, 92. Bean, J. L., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Homeier, D., 2010. A ground-based trans- mission spectrum of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b 468, 669–672. Bellucci, A., Sicardy, B., Drossart, P., Rannou, P., Nicholson, P. D., Hedman, M., Baines, K. H., Burrati, B., 2009. Titan solar occultation observed by Cassini/VIMS: Gas absorption and constraints on aerosol composition. Icarus 201, 198–216. Belyaev, D. A., Montmessin, F., Bertaux, J.-L., Mahieux, A., Fedorova, A. A., Ko- rablev, O. I., Marcq, E., Yung, Y. L., Zhang, X., 2012. Vertical profiling of SO2 and SO above Venus' clouds by SPICAV/SOIR solar occultations. Icarus 217, 740–751. Blamont, J. E., Chassefiere, E., Goutail, J. P., Mege, B., Nunes-Pinharanda, M., 1989. Vertical profiles of dust and ozone in the Martian atmosphere deduced from solar occultation measurements. Nature 341, 600–603. Brown, R. H., Baines, K. H., Bellucci, G., Bibring, J.-P., Buratti, B. J., Capac- cioni, F., Cerroni, P., Clark, R. N., Coradini, A., Cruikshank, D. P., Drossart, P., Formisano, V., Jaumann, R., Langevin, Y., Matson, D. L., McCord, T. B., Men- nella, V., Miller, E., Nelson, R. M., Nicholson, P. D., Sicardy, B., Sotin, C., 2004. The Cassini Visual And Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (Vims) Investigation. Space Science Reviews 115, 111–168. Brown, T. M., 2001. Transmission Spectra as Diagnostics of Extrasolar Giant Planet Atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 553, 1006–1026. Cahalan, R. F., Oreopoulos, L., Marshak, A., Evans, K. F., Davis, A. B., Pin- cus, R., Yetzer, K. H., Mayer, B., Davies, R., Ackerman, T. P., Barker, H. W., Clothiaux, E. E., Ellingson, R. G., Garay, M. J., Kassianov, E., Kinne, S., Macke, A., O'Hirok, W., Partain, P. T., Prigarin, S. M., Rublev, A. N., Stephens, G. L., Szczap, F., Takara, E. E., V´arnai, T., Wen, G., Zhuravleva, T. B., 2005. THE I3RC: Bringing Together the Most Advanced Radiative Transfer Tools for Cloudy Atmospheres. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86, 1275–1293. Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., Burke, C. J., Nutzman, P., Buchhave, L. A., Lovis, C., Bonfils, X., Latham, D. W., Udry, S., Murray-Clay, R. A., Holman, M. J., Falco, E. E., Winn, J. N., Queloz, D., Pepe, F., Mayor, M., Delfosse, X., Forveille, T., 2009. A super-Earth transiting a nearby low-mass star 462, 891– 894. Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., Gilliland, R. L., 2002. Detection of an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 568, 377–384. Croll, B., Albert, L., Jayawardhana, R., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Fortney, J. J., Murray, N., Neilson, H., 2011. Broadband Transmission Spectroscopy of the Super-Earth GJ 1214b Suggests a Low Mean Molecular Weight Atmosphere. 18 Astrophys. J. 736, 78. de Haan, J. F., Bosma, P. B., Hovenier, J. W., 1987. The adding method for multiple scattering calculations of polarized light. Astron. Astrophys. 183, 371–391. de Mooij, E. J. W., Brogi, M., de Kok, R. J., Koppenhoefer, J., Nefs, S. V., Snellen, I. A. G., Greiner, J., Hanse, J., Heinsbroek, R. C., Lee, C. H., van der Werf, P. P., 2012. Optical to near-infrared transit observations of super-Earth GJ 1214b: water-world or mini-Neptune? 538, A46. de Rooij, W. A., van der Stap, C. C. A. H., 1984. Expansion of Mie scattering matrices in generalized spherical functions. Astron. Astrophys. 131, 237–248. Elliot, J. L., Ates, A., Babcock, B. A., Bosh, A. S., Buie, M. W., Clancy, K. B., Dunham, E. W., Eikenberry, S. S., Hall, D. T., Kern, S. D., Leggett, S. K., Levine, S. E., Moon, D.-S., Olkin, C. B., Osip, D. J., Pasachoff, J. M., Penprase, B. E., Person, M. J., Qu, S., Rayner, J. T., Roberts, L. C., Salyk, C. V., Souza, S. P., Stone, R. C., Taylor, B. W., Tholen, D. J., Thomas-Osip, J. E., Ticehurst, D. R., Wasserman, L. H., 2003. The recent expansion of Pluto's atmosphere 424, 165– 168. Fedorova, A., Korablev, O., Vandaele, A., Bertaux, J., Belyaev, D., Mahieux, A., Neefs, E., Wilquet, W. V., Drummond, R., Montmessin, F., Villard, E., 2008. HDO and H2O vertical distributions and isotopic ratio in the Venus mesosphere by Solar Occultation at Infrared spectrometer on board Venus Express. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 113, doi:10.1029/2008JE003146. Forget, F., Montmessin, F., Bertaux, J.-L., Gonz´alez-Galindo, F., Lebonnois, S., Qu´emerais, E., Reberac, A., Dimarellis, E., L´opez-Valverde, M. A., 2009. Den- sity and temperatures of the upper Martian atmosphere measured by stellar oc- cultations with Mars Express SPICAM. Journal of Geophysical Research (Plan- ets) 114, 1004. Formisano, V., D'Aversa, E., Bellucci, G., Baines, K. H., Bibring, J. P., Brown, R. H., Buratti, B. J., Capaccioni, F., Cerroni, P., Clark, R. N., Coradini, A., Cruik- shank, D. P., Drossart, P., Jaumann, R., Langevin, Y., Matson, D. L., McCord, T. B., Mennella, V., Nelson, R. M., Nicholson, P. D., Sicardy, B., Sotin, C., Chamberlain, M. C., Hansen, G., Hibbitts, K., Showalter, M., Filacchione, G., 2003. Cassini-VIMS at Jupiter: solar occultation measurements using Io. Icarus 166, 75–84. Grinspoon, D. H., Pollack, J. B., Sitton, B. R., Carlson, R. W., Kamp, L. W., Baines, K. H., Encrenaz, T., Taylor, F. W., 1993. Probing Venus's cloud structure with Galileo NIMS. Plan. & Space Sci. 41, 515–542. Hansen, J. E., Travis, L. D., 1974. Light scattering in planetary atmospheres. Space Sci. Rev. 16, 527–610. Henyey, L. G., Greenstein, J. L., 1941. Diffuse radiation in the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 93, 70–83. Hovenier, J. W., de Haan, J. F., 1985. Polarized light in planetary atmospheres for perpendicular directions. Astron. Astrophys. 146, 185–191. Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J., Lunine, J. I., Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., Pinto, P., 2001. Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planet Transits. Astrophys. J. 560, 413–419. Hubbard, W. B., Hunten, D. M., Dieters, S. W., Hill, K. M., Watson, R. D., 1988. 19 Occultation evidence for an atmosphere on Pluto. Nature 336, 452–454. Kim, S., Sim, C., Lee, D., Courtin, R., Moses, J., Minh, Y., 2012. The three-micron spectral feature of the Saturnian haze: implications for the haze composition and formation process. Plan. & Space Sci. in press, in press. Kim, S. J., Jung, A., Sim, C. K., Courtin, R., Bellucci, A., Sicardy, B., Song, I. O., Minh, Y. C., 2011. Retrieval and tentative indentification of the 3 µm spectral feature in Titan's haze. Plan. & Space Sci. 59, 699–704. Kleinbohl, A., Schofield, J. T., Kass, D. M., Abdou, W. A., Backus, C. R., Sen, B., Shirley, J. H., Lawson, W. G., Richardson, M. I., Taylor, F. W., Teanby, N. A., McCleese, D. J., 2009. Mars Climate Sounder limb profile retrieval of atmospheric temperature, pressure, and dust and water ice opacity. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 114, 10006. Krasnopol'Skii, V. A., Moroz, V. I., Krysko, A. A., Korablev, O. I., Zhegulev, V. S., 1989. Solar occultation spectroscopic measurements of the Martian atmosphere at 1.9 and 3.7 microns. Nature 341, 603. Lacis, A. A., Oinas, V., 1991. A description of the correlated k distribution method for modeling nongray gaseous absorption, thermal emission, and multiple- scattering in vertically inhomogeneous atmospheres. J. Geophys. Res. 96 (D5), 9027–9063. Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., D´esert, J.-M., Sing, D., 2008. Rayleigh scattering by H2 in the extrasolar planet HD 209458b. Astron. Astro- phys. 485, 865–869. Macke, A., Mitchell, D., Bremen, L., 1999. Monte Carlo radiative transfer calcu- lations for inhomogeneous mixed phase clouds. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth B 24, 237–241. Miller-Ricci, E., Fortney, J. J., 2010. The Nature of the Atmosphere of the Transit- ing Super-Earth GJ 1214b. Astrophys. J. Lett. 716, L74–L79. Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., Lacis, A., 2006. Multiple Scattering of Light by Particles. Cambridge University Press. Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., Macke, A., 1996. Scattering of light by polydis- perse, randomly oriented, finite circular cylinders. Appl. Optics 35, 4927–4940. Niemann, H. B., Atreya, S. K., 16 colleagues, 2005. The abundances of constituents of Titan's atmosphere from the GCMS instrument on the Huygens probe. Nature 438, 779–784. Palmer, K. F., Williams, D., 1975. Optical constants of sulfuric acid - Application to the clouds of Venus. Appl. Optics 14, 208–219. Pont, F., Knutson, H., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., Charbonneau, D., 2008. Detec- tion of atmospheric haze on an extrasolar planet: the 0.55-1.05 µm transmission spectrum of HD 189733b with the HubbleSpaceTelescope. Monthly Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 385, 109–118. Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I., 42 colleagues, 2009. The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectro. Rad. Trans. 96, 139–204. Seager, S., Deming, D., 2010. Exoplanet Atmospheres. Annual Review of Astron- omy and Astrophysics 48, 631–672. Seager, S., Sasselov, D. D., 2000. Theoretical Transmission Spectra during Extra- 20 solar Giant Planet Transits. Astrophys. J. 537, 916–921. Shettle, E. P., Weinman, J. A., 1970. The Transfer of Solar Irradiance Through Inhomogeneous Turbid Atmospheres Evaluated by Eddington's Approximation. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 27, 1048–1055. Sing, D. K., Pont, F., Aigrain, S., Charbonneau, D., D´esert, J.-M., Gibson, N., Gilliland, R., Hayek, W., Henry, G., Knutson, H., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Mazeh, T., Shporer, A., 2011. Hubble Space Telescope transmission spec- troscopy of the exoplanet HD 189733b: high-altitude atmospheric haze in the optical and near-ultraviolet with STIS. Monthly Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 416, 1443– 1455. Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., de Mooij, E. J. W., Albrecht, S., 2010. The orbital motion, absolute mass and high-altitude winds of exoplanet HD209458b. Nature 465, 1049–1051. Stern, S. A., Slater, D. C., Scherrer, J., Stone, J., Dirks, G., Versteeg, M., Davis, M., Gladstone, G. R., Parker, J. W., Young, L. A., Siegmund, O. H. W., 2008. ALICE: The Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Aboard the New Horizons Pluto-Kuiper Belt Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 140, 155–187. Tinetti, G., Vidal-Madjar, A., Liang, M.-C., Beaulieu, J.-P., Yung, Y., Carey, S., Barber, R. J., Tennyson, J., Ribas, I., Allard, N., Ballester, G. E., Sing, D. K., Selsis, F., 2007. Water vapour in the atmosphere of a transiting extrasolar planet. Nature 448, 169–171. Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L., Engel, S., Dafoe, L. E., West, R., Lemmon, M., Karkoschka, E., See, C., 2008. A model of Titan's aerosols based on measure- ments made inside the atmosphere. Plan. & Space Sci. 56, 669–707. Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L. R., Lemmon, M., Smith, P. H., Wegryn, E., 1999. Prop- erties of dust in the Martian atmosphere from the Imager on Mars Pathfinder. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 8987–9008. Vandaele, A. C., De Mazi`ere, M., Drummond, R., Mahieux, A., Neefs, E., Wil- quet, V., Korablev, O., Fedorova, A., Belyaev, D., Montmessin, F., Bertaux, J.- L., 2008. Composition of the Venus mesosphere measured by Solar Occultation at Infrared on board Venus Express. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 113, 0. Vinatier, S., B´ezard, B., 13 colleagues, 2006. Vertical abundance profiles of hy- drocarbons in Titan's atmosphere at 15◦S and 80◦N retrieved from Cassini/CIRS spectra. Icarus 188, 120–138. 21
1008.1058	1	1008	2010-08-05T20:00:00	The Luminosity Function of the Hot and Cold Kuiper belt Populations	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Abridged. We have performed an ecliptic survey of the Kuiper belt, with an areal coverage of 8.9 square degrees to a 50% limiting magnitude of r'=24.7, and have detected 88 Kuiper belt objects, roughly half of which received follow-up one to two months after detection. Using this survey data alone, we have measured the luminosity function of the Kuiper belt, thus avoiding any biases that might come from the inclusion of other observations. We have found that the Cold population defined as having inclinations less than 5 degrees has a luminosity function slope alpha=0.82+-0.23, and is different from the Hot population, which has inclinations greater than 5 degrees and a luminosity function slope alpha=0.35+-0.21. As well, we have found that those objects closer than 38 AU have virtually the same luminosity function slope as the Hot population. This result, along with similar findings of past surveys demonstrates that the dynamically cold Kuiper belt objects likely have a steep size distribution, and are unique from all of the excited populations which have much shallower distributions. This suggests that the dynamically excited population underwent a different accretion history and achieved a more evolved state of accretion than the cold population. As well, we discuss the similarities of the Cold and Hot populations with the size distributions of other planetesimal populations. We find that while the Jupiter family comets and the scattered disk exhibit similar size distributions, a power-law extrapolation to small sizes for the scattered disk cannot account for the observed influx of comets. As well, we have found that the Jupiter Trojan and Hot populations cannot have originated from the same parent popuation, a result that is difficult to reconcile with scattering models similar to the NICE model.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	The Luminosity Function of the Hot and Cold Kuiper belt Populations Wesley C. Frasera,, Michael E. Browna, Megan E. Schwamba aDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, MS150-21, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 USA 0 1 0 2 g u A 5 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 8 5 0 1 . 8 0 0 1 : v i X r a Abstract We have performed an ecliptic survey of the Kuiper belt, with an areal coverage of 8.9 square degrees to a 50% limiting magnitude of r′ Sloan = 24.7, and have detected 88 Kuiper belt objects, roughly half of which received follow-up one to two months after detection. Using this survey data alone, we have measured the luminosity function of the Kuiper belt, thus avoiding any biases that might come from the inclusion of other observations. We have found that the Cold population defined as having inclinations less than 5o has a luminosity function slope αCold = 0.82±0.23, and is different from the Hot population, which has inclinations greater than 5o and a luminosity function slope αHot = 0.35±0.21. As well, we have found that those objects closer than 38 AU have virtually the same luminosity function slope as the Hot population. This result, along with similar findings of past surveys demonstrates that the dynamically cold Kuiper belt objects likely have a steep size distribution, and are unique from all of the excited populations which have much shallower distributions. This suggests that the dynamically excited population underwent a different accretion history and achieved a more evolved state of accretion than the cold population. As well, we discuss the similarities of the Cold and Hot populations with the size distributions of other planetesimal populations. We find that while the Jupiter family comets and the scattered disk exhibit similar size distributions, a power-law extrapolation to small sizes for the scattered disk cannot account for the observed influx of comets. As well, we have found that the Jupiter Trojan and Hot populations cannot have originated from the same parent popuation, a result that is difficult to reconcile with scattering models similar to the NICE model. We conclude that the similarity between the size distributions of the Cold population and the Jupiter Trojan population is a striking coincidence. Keywords: Kuiper Belt Centaurs Trojan asteroids Accretion 1. Introduction The size distribution is one of the most funda- mental properties of a planetesimal population. As the size of an object is primarily determined from its accretion and collisional disruption histories, the size distribution can reveal important information on the accretion and collisional history of that pop- ulation (for a recent example, see Bottke et al., 2005). Unlike the closer populations such as the aster- oid belt, whose proximity has allowed the accu- rate measurement of their size distributions (see for example Jedicke and Metcalfe, 1998; Jewitt et al., ✩ Accepted by Icarus August 2nd, 2010. Email address: [email protected] (Wesley C. Fraser ) Preprint submitted to Elsevier 2000), the distance to the Kuiper belt has prevented an equally detailed determination of its size distri- bution. Observations thus far have demonstrated that for the Kuiper belt as a whole, the size distri- bution for objects with diameters, D & 200 km, is well described by a power-law. At some size 50 . D . 150 km, the size distribution rolls-over to a shallower distribution (Bernstein et al., 2004; Fuentes et al., 2009; Fraser and Kavelaars, 2009). Smaller than the roll-over, the size distribution ap- pears to remain shallow to objects as small as D ∼ 1 km (Schlichting et al., 2009). While the accuracy of current measurements pre- vents a detailed modelling of the history of ob- jects in the region, some insight has already been gained. The steepness of the large object size distribution implies that for this population, ac- April 3, 2018 cretion was a short-lived phenomenon, likely not more than a few 100 Myr (Gladman et al., 2001; Kenyon, 2002; Fraser et al., 2008). The paucity of the observed belt, and the existence of the largest known members demonstrates that the belt has undergone significant mass depletion, losing as much or more than 99% of its primordial mass (Stern and Colwell, 1997; Kenyon and Luu, 1998; Jewitt and Sheppard, 2002; Fuentes et al., 2009). The existence of the roll-over at sizes larger than D & 50 km suggests that the belt has undergone significant collisional com- minution in a region of significantly increased density compared to today (Kenyon and Bromley, 2004; Benavidez and Campo Bagatin, 2009; Fraser, 2009). As well, recent observations have suggested that the size distribution of those dynamically cold (low inclinations and eccentricities) Kuiper belt ob- jects is different than that of the dynamically hot (large inclinations and eccentricities) population (Levison and Stern, 2001). Bernstein et al. (2004) found that the size distribution of objects with in- clinations, i < 5o was steeper than the size distri- bution of objects with i > 5o. Fuentes and Holman (2008) found similar results showing that the cold population had a steeper slope than the mixed pop- ulations as a whole. This result implies that the hot and cold populations are genetically separate pop- ulations, that have significantly different accretion and evolution histories. The results of Bernstein et al. (2004) were drawn from samples of objects compiled from many dif- ferent surveys. This practice was necessitated by available data. All surveys had either shallow lim- iting magnitudes and a large areal coverage, or vice-versa. The result was that most surveys did not have a sufficient range of objects for which the size distribution could be accurately measured from that survey alone. The practice of using data from multiple surveys opens the results to the possibility of being affected by calibration issues and variations in sky density which could lead to an incorrect measurement of the size distribution. When these effects were properly accounted for, Fraser et al. (2008); Fraser and Kavelaars (2009) found that these data could not be used to reliably test differences in subpopulations of the Kuiper belt. Here we present the results of a new Kuiper belt survey. By virtue of the survey's design, a large number of objects were discovered and followed to 2 determine their inclinations, over a range of sizes sufficient to measure the size distribution for the hot and cold population without the use of other surveys. In Section 2 we present our observations, and our data reductions and discovery techniques. In Section 3 we present the analysis of our results, in Section 4 we discuss the implications of our results, and we end with concluding remarks in Section 5. 2. Observations and Reductions 2.1. Discovery Observations The discovery observations were made on Octo- ber 18, 2009 (UT) with Suprime-cam on the 8.2 m Subaru telescope (Miyazaki et al., 2002). Suprime- cam is 10-chip mosaic camera, with a field-of-view of roughly 34'×27' with ∼ 15" chip-gaps, and has a pixel scale of 0.2". The observations consisted imaging 34 fields, each visited three times in the r' filter with the camera long axis oriented horizon- tally in RA, with each visit consisting of a single 200 s exposure. The first and last images of a field were separated by roughly 6.5 hours. The observed fields were all within ∼ 1.5o of the ecliptic and within ∼ 10o of opposition at the discovery epoch. The total areal coverage of our survey after accounting for chip-gaps was 8.93 square degrees. Details of the individual fields are shown in Table 1 and Fig- ure 1. The observations included multiple images of the D1 and D4 fields of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Supernova Legacy Survey (Astier et al., 2006) at various airmasses to provide both photo- metric and astrometric calibrations of the discovery images. The images were pre-processed with standard techniques; the bias levels were removed, and a mas- ter bias frame, set as the average of 10 bias images was removed from all science frames. A master sky- flat was produced from the science frames using a clipped median filter, and was removed from the science images producing background variations no larger than ∼ 1% across a mosaic. Photometric calibrations were done on a chip-by- chip basis using the Mega-pipe source catalog of the D1 and D4 fields (Gwyn, 2008). The zeropoint was found to be identical for all chips within un- certainties, with a value, ZrSubaru = 27.50 ± 0.02. The conversion from the Suprime-cam instrumental magnitudes to those of Mega-pipe was found to be M ega − r′ m(r′)Suprime = m(r′)M ega − 0.018(g′ M ega). (1) Atmospheric extinction was measured from the sci- ence frames. The airmass correction was found to be 0.08 magnitudes per unit increase in airmass. Comparison of common background sources in each triplet revealed no large seeing or transparency vari- ations throughout the night (see Figures 2 and 3); the night was photometric. The Suprime-cam field of view is highly distorted, especially near field edges, requiring calibration to ensure accurate astrometry of moving sources in the observations. Scamp (Bertin, 2006) was used to measure second order spatial distortions of the Suprime-cam field, from the D1 and D4 fields on a chip-by-chip basis. Little variance in the distortions was found over the airmass range of these observa- tions. Thus, a master distortion map for each chip was produced from all images of the D1 and D4 fields. Absolute calibration of each science image was done using the USNO-B catalog, and the mas- ter distortion map, resulting in residuals of roughly 0.3". Relative astrometry between the three images of each field - a triplet - was performed by matching sources between an image, and the reference image, chosen as the image of the triplet with the low- est absolute residuals. This resulted in an excellent common astrometric solution for the triplet, with residuals of . 0.06" between all three images. This calibrations procedure ensured reliable astrometry to both maximize the discovery efficiency of moving sources, as well as secure the possibility of follow-up on future dates. 2.2. Moving Object Search The Suprime-cam data were utilized to search for moving objects in the Solar system, in and beyond the orbits of the gas-giant planets. To characterize the detection efficiency of our moving object detec- tion method, artificial moving point sources were implanted in the observations. The stellar point-spread function (PSF) was gen- erated on an image-by-image and chip-by-chip basis from 10-15 hand-selected, visually inspected point sources for each chip. It was found that a spatially constant PSF was sufficient to model the stellar shape across a chip. The PSFs were created using the tools in the doaphot package of IRAF and for each image consisted of an average Moffat profile with look-up table of the PSF stars of that chip. Random artificial sources were generated on Sun- bound orbits, with semi-major axes, 18 ≤ a ≤ 1000 AU, eccentricities, e ≤ 0.6, and inclinations, i ≤ 90o. Anomaly, periapse, and nodal angles were chosen at random to ensure that the sources fell in the images and could be either approaching or receding from their nodes. 20-30 artificial sources were planted in each chip with apparent magnitudes in the range 21 ≤ r′ ≤ 26.5 with image-to-image flux variations matching those measured from 30-40 bright stars common to each image of a triplet, thus ensuring that any extinction variations throughout the observations were accounted for. If an artifi- cial source's motion would cause it to drift more than 0.2 pixels during an exposure, it was broken up into multiple fainter sources with 0.2 pixel spac- ing and a total flux equal to that of the artificial source. Thus, trailing effects were fully accounted for in our search. Moving objects were identified by their motions between images of a triplet. Using Sextractor (Bertin et al., 2002), all sources in an image were tabulated. Stationary sources common to each im- age in a triplet were flagged, and ignored from fur- ther consideration, leaving only those sources who were either moving, or had highly variable fluxes. The remaining sources of an image triplet were then searched for motion consistent with Sun-bound ob- jects. Candidate sources were chosen as any three individual point-source detections, one per image, whose centroid moved at least one pixel (0.2") and at most ∼5" between each image. These candi- date sources were then further filtered by fit radec (Bernstein and Khushalani, 2000). If the best-fit orbit to the candidate had a chi-squared larger than 7.5, the candidate was rejected. The results of this were approximately 16000 candidate sources which were then visual inspected by an operator for final acceptance or rejection. The majority of visually inspected candidates were false, primarily caused by cosmic ray impacts, or extended sources which were identified by Sex- tractor as more than one source in some images. Of the 16,000 candidates, roughly a third were matched with implanted artificial sources. From these sources, the performance of the search rou- tine was characterized. The results are shown in Figure 4. As can be seen, the detection efficiency is well described by the familiar functional form η(r') = 3 A 2 (cid:18)1 − tanh(cid:18) r′ − m∗ g (cid:19)(cid:19) (2) where A, m∗, and g are the maximum efficiency, half-maximum magnitude, and half-width param- eters. The survey achieved a 50% limiting magni- tude for discovery of r'=24.7. The search was found to be sensitive to objects as distant as ∼ 900 AU, beyond which, insufficient motion was exhibited for reliable detection. No significant variation in search efficiency with inclination or eccentricity was found (see Figures 5 and 6). The search resulted in the detection of 88 sources. The sources' distances and inclinations were de- termined with fit radec. Photometry was mea- sured using standard aperture photometry tech- niques with corrections for airmass applied (see Fig- ure 3). Aperture corrections were measured from the bright stars from which the PSFs were gener- ated. Photometric uncertainties were determined from the function ∆r′ = δ + γ10 r′ −Z 2.5 (3) where δ is a constant representing the extinction stability of the night in question, γ is a constant proportional to the parameters of the detector (see Fraser et al., 2008, for a derivation), and Z is the telescope photometric zeropoint. This function was fit to the difference in measured and planted mag- nitudes of the artificial sources. The best-fit pa- rameters are (δ, γ) = (0.028, 3.25). The best-fit δ is in agreement with the scatter in extinction exhib- ited in Figure 3. Along with the measured fluxes with uncertainties sampled per measurement from Equation 3, these results are presented in Table 2. One detected object was identified as previously known Plutino 2004 VT75 which was not known to be in the observed fields prior to detection. This detection confirmed the accuracy of both the photo- metric and astrometric calibrations. The detected position of 2004 VT75 was ∼ 0.2" from that pre- dicted from the Minor Planet Center. As well, this source was detected across different chips demon- strating that the astrometric fits for different chips of the same mosaic image are reliable in an absolute sense. 2.3. Follow-up For a subset of the objects, follow-up obser- vations were performed with the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS) on the Keck-I tele- scope on the nights of November 21st, 22nd and December 21st, 2009 (UT). LRIS is a dual channel (blue and red) camera, with each camera, a 2 CCD 4 mosaic having approximately a 6X8' field of view, with a ∼ 25" gap, and a pixel scale of 0.135". This particular instrument is convenient for our follow- up observations, as the positional uncertainty el- lipse of our targets at the time of follow-up was slightly smaller than the areal coverage of a single detector CCD. The follow-up observations consisted of pairs of images at the positions of each target, predicted from fit radec, with temporal spacing between each image sufficient to detect the object's motion. By virtue of the dual channel imaging abilities of the camera, images in both the g and r LRIS filters were taken simultaneously. Exposure times were scaled from the flux of each source in the discovery images, and were chosen such that each source would have a photometric signal-to-noise ratio of ∼ 10 in each image. Images of the D1 and D4 Supernova fields were taken for calibration purposes. Due to time constraints, only those objects who's distance might place them beyond 39 AU, and with magnitude in discovery images brightward of r′ = 24.5 were followed. 41 objects satisfied these constraints and were pursued in the follow-up ob- servations. Due to the geometry of the follow-up observa- tions, asteroid confusion was a concern. The pre- dicted rate of motion of the follow-up targets was used as a diagnostic of whether or not a detected moving object was the correct source. The second CCD of the LRIS detector provided a measure of this asteroid confusion rate, as no Kuiper belt ob- jects were expected to fall within this region of the images. In the November follow-up data, 3 aster- oids with brightnesses and rates of motion consis- tent with our Kuiper belt targets were found in the second CCD for all follow-up exposures. With the exception of two follow-up pointings, our objects were not confused, as only one moving target per field was identified with a rate of motion consistent with the targeted source. This is consistent with our asteroid confusion rate determined from the other CCD. Special attention for the two objects with confused follow-up was made during the De- cember observations. From the december data, the interloper in the November observations was easily rejected achieving reliable links between the discov- ery and follow-up images for all follow-up targets. No confusion occurred during the December follow- up. Our follow-up efforts were rewarded with 100% success rate for all 41 targets satisfying our dis- tance and magnitude cuts. The conditions on the November nights were photometric and of moder- ate seeing, with full-width at half maximum . 1.5". On the night in December, while it was photomet- ric, the seeing conditions were mediocre, reducing the observing efficiency compared to the November nights. As such, all of the 41 objects for which we attempted follow-up have month-long arcs, while only a small subset of 10 have arcs longer than this. The results of the follow-up efforts are presented in Table 2. Astrometric and photometric calibrations of the LRIS images were performed using the same tech- niques as applied to the Suprime-cam images. The astrometric distortions of the LRIS field were small, but noticeable, and varied with airmass. Distortion maps extracted from the calibration images at air- masses similar to the science images provided resid- ual errors of ∼ 0.3−0.4" with respect to the USNO- B catalog. For the LRIS blue-channel, the photometric zero- point was found to be ZgKeck = 27.91±0.03 with an airmass term Ag = 0.15±0.05. During the observa- tions, the LRIS red-channel detectors were plagued by electronics difficulties causing charge transfer inefficiencies that were dependent on source flux. This effect was found to be as much as ∼ 10% in engineering images. As such, we adopt a 10% un- certainty on the zeropoint of this detector, and find, ZrKeck = 28.55 ± 0.1. The red-airmass term was found to be Ar = 0.08 ± 0.03. The conversions between the LRIS r and g mag- nitudes and the r' and g' Mega-pipe magnitudes were found to be m(r)Keck = m(r′ M ega) − 0.2(g′ M ega − r′ M ega) (4) and m(g)Keck = m(g′ M ega) + 1.2(g′ M ega − r′ M ega). (5) The relatively large correction between gKeck and g′ M ega is caused by the LRIS beam-splitter configu- ration which, in the configuration we utilized, trun- cated the red side of the gKeck filter while preserv- ing the throughput across the rKeck filter. 2.4. Color Conversion To facilitate the combination of the discovery and follow-up images, all photometry needed to be 5 converted to a single system. The Sloan system (Smith et al., 2002) was chosen. The conversion from Megaprime magnitudes to the Sloan system are M ega = r′ r′ Sloan − 0.024(g′ Sloan − r′ Sloan) and g′ M ega = g′ Sloan − 0.153(g′ Sloan − r′ Sloan). (6) (7) From Equations 1, 4, and 5 and the conversions pre- sented above, we find that the conversions from the Subaru and Keck photometry to the Sloan system are r′ Sloan = rKeck − 0.094(gKeck − rKeck), (8) g′ Sloan = gKeck − 0.445(gKeck − rKeck), (9) and r′ Sloan = rSubaru − 0.019(gKeck − rKeck). (10) Using Equations 8-10, all photometry have been converted to the Sloan system. The photometry presented in Table 2 are the weighted averages of all measurements presented here. When no (gKeck − rKeck) colour was available, the average color of all those objects that did receive follow-up, (gKeck − rKeck) = 1.21 was used to convert to the Sloan survey. As the range of Keck colors for our sample is 0.68 ≤ (gKeck − rKeck) ≤ 1.96, we estimate the error in the conversion caused by using this average color is ∼ 0.02 magnitudes, negligibly small. Sloan − r′ In Figure 7 we present the (g′ Sloan) color versus inclination for those objects with follow-up observations. From this figure, it can be seen that our sample exhibits similar behaviour to the Kuiper belt objects in the Minor Planet Center analyzed by Peixinho et al. (2008). That is, there is a corre- lation with colour and inclination; low inclination objects are typically redder than higher inclination objects. As both our colours and inclinations are significantly more inaccurate than those in the sam- ple analyzed by Peixinho et al. (2008), a repeat of the same analysis on our data is not warranted, as no more insight would be gained than by visu- ally comparing our sample to theirs (see Figure 1 of Peixinho et al. (2008)). 3. Analysis As found by Bernstein et al. (2004), their seems to be some variation in the Kuiper belt size distribu- tion with orbital excitation. More specifically, they defined two populations, the Cold sample, which contains those objects with heliocentric distances, 38 < d < 55 AU and inclinations, i < 5o, and the Excited population as all those Kuiper belt objects in the same distance range, but with large inclina- tions. Bernstein et al. (2004) found that for bright objects (R < 24), the Cold population had a much steeper size distribution than the Excited popula- tion. This result was found from a sample of Kuiper belt objects compiled from a large number of dif- ferent surveys, providing a result possibly affected by calibration errors and sky density variations. Elliot et al. (2005) analyzed the results of the Deep Ecliptic Survey, and found similar results. That is, that the cold classical objects have a steeper size distribution than the resonant, or ex- cited populations. This result however, was drawn from a survey without a calibrated detection effi- ciency, making the result untrustworthy. Fuentes and Holman (2008) performed a similar analysis as Bernstein et al. (2004), but with addi- tional survey data. Their findings were similar, ie., that the hot population size distribution is shal- lower than that of the cold population. But much like Bernstein et al. (2004), they considered data from multiple surveys and may have been affected by the same calibration errors and sky density vari- ations. (2008); Fraser et al. Fraser and Kavelaars (2009) reanalyzed the survey data considered in Bernstein et al. (2004) along with new observa- tions, and introduced a technique which accounted for possible errors induced from combining the results of different surveys when measuring the size distribution. They found that the apparent differ- ences between the hot and cold populations could not be disentangled from possible effects caused by the combination of different surveys. When correctly accounting for these effects, no statistical difference between the hot and cold population was found. Population differences as large as those inferred by Bernstein et al. (2004) might exist, but their presence could not be discerned from the available data sets. The survey we present here, has sufficient depth, and number of detections to probe the differences in size distributions of the hot and cold populations 6 alone, without the need for other data. By doing so, we can ensure that the biases that may be intro- duced from the use of multiple datasets are avoided here providing a clean and reliable test for any dif- ferences between the hot and cold populations of the Kuiper belt. 3.1. The Samples We want to test the findings of Bernstein et al. (2004). To that end, we define subsets of our de- tections, which are similar to those considered by Bernstein et al. (2004). They are defined as follows: 1. We define TNO sample, as all the detections in our sample. 2. Like Bernstein et al. (2004) we define the Cold population as those objects with 38 < d < 55 AU and i < 5o. We also further refine this, and define the Cold F sample as only those sources from the Cold sample who received follow-up observations in addition to the discovery ob- servations. 3. We define the Hot F and Hot samples as those objects with 38 < d < 55 AU and i > 5o, who have and have not received follow-up observa- tions respectively. 4. We define the Close population, as those ob- jects with 30 < d < 38. We do not make any distinction about follow-up, as the majority of the Close population was not observed beyond the discovery observations. We note here that the exact inclination division between the Cold and Hot populations is uncer- tain. Measurements of the inclination distributions of the Hot and Cold samples suggest that the vast majority of cold classical objects will have inclina- tions less than i ∼ 5o (Brown, 2001; Gulbis et al., 2010). Analysis of the optical colour distribution of Kuiper belt objects reveals a correlation of colour with inclination (Peixinho et al., 2008, for a re- cent example, see) that suggests there is a divi- sion between low-inclination red objects, and low- inclination neutral objects at i ∼ 12o. Given the uncertainty of the inclination division that sepa- rates the Cold and Hot populations, we consider the full range of inclination divisions testable by our observations and primarily discuss the histori- cal division of i = 5o unless otherwise stated. The Close population is a mix of objects in mean- motion resonances with Neptune, the Centaurs, and the scattered disk objects. On the other hand, the Hot population consists of hot classical, reso- nant, and scattered disk objects. While the exact fractional mix of each of these populations cannot be determined from our observations, the Minor Planet Center can guide us as to which populations dominate these subsamples. Analysis of the objects in the Minor Planet Center, near opposition in late October, within a few degrees of the ecliptic, reveals 13 objects satisfying 30 < d < 38 AU, 6 of which are Plutinos, and 36 objects satisfying d > 38 AU and i > 5o, of which only a few are Plutinos, with the majority being hot classical and scattered disk ob- jects. As the relative mixes of each dynamical class are different for the Hot and Close subsamples, any differences detected in the size distributions of the subsamples can provide insight into the size distri- butions of the underlying populations. 3.2. The Methods As the Kuiper belt objects we detect are not re- solved, we have no measure of their sizes, and there- fore cannot measure the size distribution of our sample directly. Rather, we must use an in-direct technique, and infer the size distribution from the luminosity function. Brightward of R ∼ 25, the luminosity function is well represented by a power- law. That is, the differential surface density of ob- jects with magnitude m per square-degree is given by Σ(m) = α ln(10)10α(m−mo) (11) where α is the logarithmic slope of the power- law, and mo is the magnitude at which there is one object per square degree with that magni- tude, or brighter. Recent measurements suggest that, for the TNO sample, α = 0.73 − 0.76 and mo ∼ 23.4 in the R-band (Fuentes et al., 2009; Fraser and Kavelaars, 2009). It is worth noting that the luminosity function has a break, or tran- sition from the steep slope for large objects, to a shallower distribution for fainter sources. The tran- sition occurs around R ∼ 25, which is at the tail end of our survey sensitivity. As such, the break will have little to no effect on our observations, and we ignore it in our analysis. It can be shown that if the size distribution of a population is a power-law, with slope q, ie., dN dr ∝ r−q, then the luminosity function of that pop- ulation is given by Equation 11, with slope α = q−1 5 . As such, the slopes of the size distributions of each population can be determined from their luminos- ity functions (see Fraser et al., 2008, for a thorough discussion of this technique). The fits of Equation 11 is done with a Bayesian maximum likelihood technique. Specifically, the likelihood L ({m} α, mo) = e−Ω R η(m)Σ(mα,mo)dm σ(mi)Σ(miα, mo) ×Yi (12) is maximized over the luminosity function slope and normalization parameters, α and mo. Here Ω is the areal coverage of our survey, {m} is the set of magnitudes for our discovered objects, with mi the magnitude of object i. σ(mi) is a functional repre- sentation of the uncertainty in the magnitude mi. As standard practice, we adopt a gaussian repre- sentation, with widths equal to the uncertainty in the observed magnitude of each source. To avoid potential errors induced at low detec- tion efficiencies, we consider only those sources with probability of detection greater than 50% and truncate our detection efficiency below this point. Fraser et al. (2008) has demonstrated that truncat- ing the efficiency at 50% as we do here causes the best-fit slope α to appear roughly 3-5% steeper than in reality. This effect however, is much smaller than the uncertainty in the best-fit slopes we present. For the Cold F and Hot F samples, our follow-up is limited to those sources with r′ Subaru < 24.5. Thus r′ = 24.5 is our magnitude cut for the Cold F and Hot F samples. In Equation 11 we utilize only the magnitudes from discovery observations alone, as utilizing the data from other filters could possibly introduce biases into the results. We note however, that when utilizing all available flux measurements, the change in the results was significantly smaller than the uncertainties in the best-fit parameters. To test the quality of the best-fits, we utilize the Anderson-Darling statistic, ∆ = Z 1 0 (S(m) − P (m))2 P (m) (1 − P (m)) dP (m) (13) where P (m) is the cumulative probability of detect- ing an object with magnitude ≤ m, and S(m) is the cumulative distribution of detections. We calculate the probability, P (∆ > ∆obs) of finding a value, ∆, larger than that of the observations, ∆obs, given the 7 best fit-parameters by bootstrapping the statistic, ie., randomly drawing a subsample of objects from the best-fit power-law, with number equal to that detected in a particular sample, fitting Equation 11 to that random sample, and computing ∆. Values of P (∆ > ∆obs) near 0 indicate that the functional form is a poor representation of the data. 3.3. The Results The luminosity functions of the TNO , Cold , Hot , and Close samples are presented in Figure 8. The results of the fits of Equation 11 to the various subsamples are shown in Figure 9, and Table 3. As can be seen from Figures 8 and 9, the Cold F exhibits a much steeper luminosity function, with slope αCold = 0.82 ± 0.23 than the Hot F population which has slope αHot = 0.35 ± 0.21. The slopes of these two populations differ at more than the 1-σ level. Both of these samples are well described by power-laws, as exhibited by their Anderson-Darling statistics (see Table 3). Similar slopes within the uncertainties are found from the Hot and Cold sam- ples. But these values are less trustworthy as the inaccurate inclinations of those objects which did not receive follow-up cause an uncertain amount of mixing between the two subsamples. In addition, the Close sample exhibits virtu- ally the same luminosity function slope, αClose = 0.40 ± 0.15 as the Hot F ( and Hot ) sample. As the Close and Hot subsamples are made up of dif- ferent fractions of the Centaur, resonant, hot clas- sical, and scattered populations, these results sug- gests that all of these populations exhibit equally shallow luminosity functions. If one or more of the populations had a luminosity function as steep as the Cold population, it would likely be detectable as a difference in α between the Hot and Close populations, the steeper being the subsample with the greatest fraction of the steep dynamical pop- ulation. This however, is not apparent. Indeed, the slope does not change when considering the Hot and Close populations together, resulting in αHot+Close = 0.40 ± 0.12. The luminosity function of TNO sample has a slope αT N O = 0.56±0.1, which is significantly shal- lower than the slope α ∼ 0.75 found from other recent measurements in the same magnitude range (Fuentes et al., 2009; Fraser and Kavelaars, 2009). This surprising result can be understood relatively simply. The TNO sample, is a mixture of the Hot , and Cold populations, which our results have shown 8 have significantly different slopes. As such, we ex- pect the TNO sample to have a slope bounded by the slopes of the Hot (αHot ∼ 0.4) and Cold (αCold ∼ 0.8) populations. Our observations were made at a ecliptic longitude where plutinos, which are primarily members of the hot population, are preferentially at perihelion (see above). As such, we expect a greater fraction of Plutinos detected in our observations, than at other longitudes where Plutinos are not at perihelion. As the Hot popu- lation has a shallower luminosity function than the Cold population, we expect to see a flatter luminos- ity function for the TNO sample at this longitude than at others. This simple reasoning can account for the variation in luminosity function slopes seen in past surveys (see Fraser et al., 2008). Along with the size distribution differences between the Hot and Cold populations, the colour distribution (Tegler and Romanishin, 2000; Trujillo and Brown, 2002; Peixinho et al., 2008, and see Figure 7), inclination distribution (Brown, 2001), binary fraction (Stephens and Noll, 2006) and lack of large objects on dynamically cold orbits (Brown, 2008) suggest that these two populations are different. There is no clear evidence however, for a clean separation in inclination between the two. Rather, it is more likely that a smooth gra- dient exists, and as such, the historical division of idiv = 5o chosen to separate these two populations is relatively arbitrary. As such, we measured the luminosity function slopes while varying idiv. The results are presented in Figure 10. As can be seen, the Cold and Hot population slopes become significantly different for idiv & 5o. When considering all objects, not just those with follow-up, the slope of the Hot population seems to become a constant, with αHot ∼ 0.4 for idiv ≥ 6o. This suggests that above 6o the fraction of the pop- ulation with a steep size distribution is insignificant, and the observed objects come almost entirely from the population with a shallow size distribution. As the uncertainty on α is still quite large, these ob- servations however, are insufficient to confirm such a hypothesis. To test the significance of the apparent difference in luminosity functions of the Hot and Cold popu- lations, we utilize two different statistical tests. We first utilize the Kuiper-variant of the Kolmogorov- Smirnov test as a non-parametric measure of the significance in the observed difference between two populations (Press, 2002). We randomly boot- strapped from the cumulative luminosity function of the Cold sample, a sample of objects equal in number to the Hot sample. We then calculated the KS-statistic of this random sample compared to the Cold sample. This process was repeated, and from this the probability of finding a simulated KS- statistic as large or larger than that found from the actual Hot population was determined. We found that the two populations were drawn from separate parent populations at the 80-90% significance levels for inclination divisions idiv ≥ 4o. While the KS-test provides a non-parametric test, a better measure of the significance differ- ence of the Hot and Cold populations can be found with the knowledge that the two populations are well described by power-laws. To that end, we also utilized the Anderson-Darling statistic, as done in Bernstein et al. (2004); Fraser et al. (2008). Fol- lowing similar procedures as above, by randomly sampling from the best-fit power-law of the Cold F sample we determined the probability of finding a simulated Anderson-Darling statistic as large or larger than that found from the actual Hot F pop- ulation as compared to the observed Cold F sam- ple. We found that the two populations were drawn from separate parent populations at greater than the 3-σ significance for inclination divisions idiv ≥ 4o. 4. Discussion 4.1. Implications for the Kuiper belt The observed luminosity functions imply size dis- tribution slopes qCold = 5.1 ± 1.1, qHot = 2.8 ± 1.0, and qClose = 3.0±0.8 for the Cold , Hot , and Close populations. The consistency of the Hot and Close populations leaves us to consider the two popula- tions together, implying a slope for the combined population of qHot+Close = 3.0 ± 0.6. Though the results presented by Bernstein et al. (2004) and Fuentes and Holman (2008) were possi- bly affected by sky density variations and calibra- tion errors, we find similar conclusions, ie., the Cold population size distribution is steeper than the Hot population size distribution. Given the similarity in these repeated measurements of the Kuiper belt luminosity function, the results stand confident. While over the magnitude range of our obser- vations, both the Hot and Cold populations are well described by power-law models, other works have put into question whether the power-law be- haviour extends to all brightnesses. The fact that 9 the luminosity function of the TNO population ex- hibits a roll-over at magnitudes R & 25 is well accepted. The results of Bernstein et al. (2004) however, suggest that the power-law behaviour of the Cold population breaks down for the brightest objects. Specifically they find that at the bright- end, the Cold population luminosity function has a steeper slope than at fainter magnitudes. Simi- larly, Morbidelli et al. (2009) suggests that the Hot and Cold populations are intimate mixtures of two primordial populations, one with a steep size dis- tribution, and one with a shallow size distribution. In such a scenario, both populations should exhibit shallow slopes for the largest objects, then turn-up to a steeper slope for smaller objects, before finally breaking to a shallow slope at some size where col- lisional processing has dominated. To that end, we test the power-law behaviour of both the Hot and Cold populations. For the Cold population, a simple extrapola- tion of the best-fit luminosity function suggests that the brightest object on the sky in this pop- ulation should have a magnitude of R ∼ 19.5. The entire low-latitude Kuiper belt has been sur- veyed for objects to a limiting magnitude of R . 21 (Trujillo and Brown, 2003), and the brightest known Cold object has R ∼ 21.3, nearly a full magnitude fainter. This observation confirms the results of Bernstein et al. (2004). Namely, that the power-law behaviour of the Cold population lumi- nosity function cannot extend to the brightest tar- gets. Rather the power-law must be truncated. The exact behaviour cannot be determined from the observations we present here. The suggestion by Morbidelli et al. (2009) that the cold popula- tion size distribution will have a shallow slope for the largest objects, and a turn-up to the observed steep is excluded by this result. Similarly, extrapolating the best-fit power-law lu- minosity function of the Hot population suggests that this population is well described by a power- law to its brightest objects. Indeed, when ex- cluding the largest objects which are known to have different albedos than the objects observed here (Stansberry et al., 2008) the absolute magni- tude distribution of the biggest objects has a slope compatible with our observations (Brown, 2008; Morbidelli et al., 2008). To test the exactness of a power-law requires combination of other survey data sensitive to the brightest Hot members. As well this analysis should include modelling of the latitude distribution of the Hot population. The fact however, remains that the Hot population has a flat size distribution over all observable sizes. The behaviour of the Hot population luminosity function at the faint end is uncertain; the shallow slope of αHot ∼ 0.35 for R . 25 is compatible with the lack of faint detections of the Hot population in fainter surveys, eliminating the need for a break at the faint end. If however, the Hot population slope is as steep as the upper limits of our confidence interval, a break at magnitudes fainter than R ∼ 26 is still required. The existence of a break in the Hot population will only be confirmed by an off-ecliptic survey sensitive to objects with R > 26. The turn-up, as proposed by Morbidelli et al. (2009) would produce an abundance of faint objects in our observed Hot population. We can test this utilizing the Anderson-Darling statistic. We gen- erate a fake Hot subsample from a shallow power- law with the observed Hot population slope that turns up to the best-fit observed slope of the Cold population, αCold = 0.8, at some magnitude mT U . We then fit a power-law to that sample, and cal- culate the Anderson-Darling statistic. This is re- peated, and the probability of finding a statistic worse than the observations is calculated versus the value of mT U . The strength of this test is weak- ened by the sparse sampling of high-latitude sources in our dataset. We still however, eliminate such a turn-up to the slope of the Cold population for mT U < 24.2 (r') at the 2−σ level and < 23.6 at the 3-σ level. This is incompatible with the asser- tion of Morbidelli et al. (2009) who suggest that the Hot population should have the same slope as the Cold population over an absolute magnitude range of 6.5 < H < 9, corresponding to r' magnitudes, 22 . r′ . 24.5. The significance of the test results over the entire magnitude range however, prevents this result from being iron clad. Clearly, the possi- bility of a turn-up (or down) must be tested from a survey which detects a large sample of high-latitude objects. The difference in size distribution slopes of the Hot and Cold populations suggest very different histories for these two groups. Interestingly, the shallow slope of the Hot distribution is compati- ble with a heavily collisionally processed popula- tion, either one that has reached collisional equi- librium, or in which the largest objects are frag- ments of even larger, disrupted primordial bod- ies (O'Brien and Greenberg, 2003; Bottke et al., 2010). For collisional evolution to completely re- shape the size distribution of the Hot population 10 would require extremely high collision rates, seem- ingly incompatible with plausible protoplanetary disk densities, and formation scenarios (Stern, 1996; Kenyon and Bromley, 2004; Fraser, 2009). Rather it is likely that this slope is the result of the accre- tionary processes that formed the Hot population. Unlike the Hot population, the steep slope of the Cold population is entirely incompatible with a col- lisionally evolved distribution. This slope must be the result of accretionary processes as well. The shallower slope of the Hot population, and the fact that the largest objects of the Hot pop- ulation are larger than those of the Cold popula- tion, implies that the Hot population achieved a more advanced stage of accretion than the Cold population (Kenyon, 2002). The incompatibility of their slopes implies that these two populations underwent different accretion scenarios. It is possi- ble, that the Hot population underwent a longer duration of accretion than the Cold population. To halt accretion for the Cold population would require excitation and mass depletion with some yet unseen perturber beyond the outer edge of the Kuiper belt. The past existence of one or more planetary embryos in the Kuiper belt re- gion is a possible source of this excitation, and has been proposed to explain some of the Kuiper belt dynamical features (Gladman and Chan, 2006; Lykawka and Mukai, 2008). Another possibility is that the Hot population underwent accretion in a more dense region of the protoplanetary nebula. This would result in more rapid accretion than compared to the Cold pop- ulation, allowing the Hot population to grow to larger sizes before the process was halted. Under this scenario, the Hot and Cold populations could then have similar accretion timescales. As currently favoured formation scenarios suggest the Hot pop- ulation was scattered from a region closer to the Sun than their current locations (Malhotra, 1993; Gomes, 2003; Levison et al., 2008), where the pro- toplanetary disk might have been more dense, this scenario seems likely. However the Hot and Cold populations came about, their incompatible size distributions imply different accretion scenarios. Once accretion was finished, these objects were excited and emplaced onto their current orbits, creating the architecture of the current Kuiper belt. Given the dynamically cold nature of the Cold population, it seems plau- sible that this population formed in-situ. What ever the mechanism(s) ultimately responsible for the belt, our results show that little mixing between the Hot and Cold populations has occurred. law for D & 1 km. We consider this possibility here. 4.2. Comparison with Other Populations There is a striking similarity in the size distribu- tions of the Cold population, and the Jupiter Tro- jans. Both have similarly steep slopes, (qCold ∼ 5.1 and qJT ∼ 5.5), and both exhibit breaks to shallower slopes at roughly the same object di- ameter (Jewitt et al., 2000; Fraser and Kavelaars, 2009). This result argues strongly against the Tro- jan formation mechanism of the so-called NICE model in which the Trojan populations and the hot and cold Kuiper belt populations are all scat- tered into their current regions from the same pri- mordial disk population (Morbidelli et al., 2005; Nesvorn´y and Vokrouhlick´y, 2009). If this sce- nario were true, Morbidelli et al. (2009) has shown that over the magnitude range of our observations, the hot population should have the same slope as that observed for large Jupiter trojans. Using the Anderson-Darling statistic, we tested the probabil- ity of the Hot sample being drawn from a luminosity function with the slope of the Jupiter trojan lumi- nosity function, αJT = 0.9. We found that the Hot sample could not be drawn from the Jupiter trojan population at greater than the 3-σ significance. As the size distributions of these two populations in the size range considered have not evolved signif- icantly since they were emplaced in their current regions (Davis et al., 2002; Fraser and Kavelaars, 2009), we must conclude that the hot and Jupiter trojan populations must have different progenator populations. This result and the lack of mixing be- tween the hot and cold populations is difficult to reconcile with the NICE model. It seems likely the hot, cold, and trojan populations formed by sepa- rate means. If this is true, the similarities between the cold and trojan populations are quite a coinci- dence. Another similarity is seen between the Hot pop- ulation (qHot ∼ 3) and the Jupiter family comets, who exhibit a size distribution slope of qJF C ∼ 2.8 albeit over a smaller size range, 1 . D . 10 km (Tancredi et al., 2006; Weissman et al., 2009). This resemblance is interesting as one likely source of Jupiter family comets are scattered disk objects - members of the Hot population - which have fallen into the inner Solar system under gravitational per- turbations from the gas-giants, suggesting that the scattered disk size distribution might be a power- 11 While the observations we present do not mea- sure the size distribution of the scattered disk di- rectly, the similarity in slopes between the Hot and Close subsamples implies that the scattered disk cannot have a size distribution significantly differ- ent than that of the Hot sample as a whole. Addi- tionally we cannot determine the total number scat- tered disk objects from our observations. Rather, we turn to other estimates which suggest that, if their size distribution is a power-law with slope of q ∼ 3, then there are roughly 107 − 108 scattered disk objects with 1 . D . 10 km (Trujillo et al., 2000; Parker and Kavelaars, 2010, Schwamb, per- sonal communication). Simulations by Volk and Malhotra (2008) sug- gest that if the scattered disk is the sole source of the Jupiter family comets, then there must be at least 109 objects in that population to account for the current flux of Jupiter family comets through the inner Solar system, implying that either the scattered disk is not the sole source of the Jupiter family comets, or that the extrapolation of a power- law to D ∼ 1 km is unreasonable; it must be that the size distribution of scattered disk objects steep- ens significantly in the D ∼ 10 − 100 km range. Further observations are required before this fea- ture can be detected. 5. Conclusions We have performed an ecliptic survey, and have detected 88 Kuiper belt objects with magnitudes 21 < r′ Sloan < 25.2. A subset of these objects have received additional follow-up observations allowing us to accurately determine their inclinations and distances. Using these data, we have measured the size distribution of the Hot and Cold subsamples, historically defined as those objects with inclina- tions above and below 5o respectively. This mea- surement, which is independent of any previous ob- servations has confirmed that the Cold population has a much steeper luminosity function, with slope αCold = 0.82 ± 0.23, than the Hot population, with slope αHot = 0.35 ± 0.21. The observed luminosity functions imply differ- ent size distributions for the Hot and Cold pop- ulations. The size distribution slopes of the the two subsamples are qCold = 5.1 ± 1.1 and qHot = 2.8 ± 1.0. In addition, we have found that the Close popu- lation, which is defined as those objects with helio- centric distance, d < 38 have the same luminosity function slope as the Hot subsample, demonstrat- ing that these two share a similar size distribution. In addition, our findings suggest that the dynamical populations which make up both the Hot and Close populations must all have similar size distributions. The primary consequence of these findings is that the Cold population, which consists primarily of cold classical Kuiper belt objects, has a separate, and distinct accretion history from the Hot popula- tion, requiring either potentially different accretion timescales for the two populations, or formation in different locations of the protoplanetary disk. These observations reveal the similarities in the size distributions between the subsamples of the Kuiper belt and the Jupiter family comets and Trojans, suggesting a connection between the formation and subsequent evolution of the small body populations of the outer Solar system. 6. Acknowledgements Based in part on data collected at Subaru Tele- scope, which is operated by the National Astronom- ical Observatory of Japan. Some of the data pre- sented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Ob- servatory, which is operated as a scientific partner- ship among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aero- nautics and Space Administration. This research used the facilities of the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre operated by the National Research Coun- cil of Canada with the support of the Canadian Space Agency. The research upon which this pa- per is based was supported by National Aeronau- tic and Space Administration (NASA) Grant No. NASA.000261 References Astier, P., Guy, J., Regnault, N., Pain, R., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., Hook, I. M., Howell, D. A., Lafoux, H., Neill, J. D., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., Perrett, K., Pritchet, C. J., Rich, J., Sullivan, M., Taillet, R., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., Arsenijevic, V., Balland, C., Baumont, S., Bronder, J., Courtois, H., Ellis, R. S., Filiol, M., Gon¸calves, A. C., Goobar, A., Guide, D., Hardin, D., Lusset, V., Lidman, C., McMahon, R., Mouchet, M., Mourao, A., Perlmutter, S., Ripoche, P., Tao, C., Walton, N., Feb. 2006. The Su- pernova Legacy Survey: measurement of ΩM , ΩΛ and w from the first year data set. A&A 447, 31–48. 12 Benavidez, P. G., Campo Bagatin, A., Feb. 2009. Collisional evolution of Trans-Neptunian populations: Effects of frag- mentation physics and estimates of the abundances of gravitational aggregates. PSS57, 201–215. Bernstein, G., Khushalani, B., Dec. 2000. Orbit Fitting and Uncertainties for Kuiper Belt Objects. AJ 120, 3323–3332. Bernstein, G. M., Trilling, D. E., Allen, R. L., Brown, M. E., Holman, M., Malhotra, R., Sep. 2004. The Size Distribu- tion of Trans-Neptunian Bodies. AJ 128, 1364–1390. Bertin, E., Jul. 2006. Automatic Astrometric and Photomet- ric Calibration with SCAMP. In: C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique (Ed.), Astronomical Data Analy- sis Software and Systems XV. Vol. 351 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. pp. 112–+. Bertin, E., Mellier, Y., Radovich, M., Missonnier, G., Dide- lon, P., Morin, B., 2002. The TERAPIX Pipeline. In: Bohlender, D. A., Durand, D., Handley, T. H. (Eds.), As- tronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI. Vol. 281 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Se- ries. pp. 228–+. Bottke, W. F., Durda, D. D., Nesvorn´y, D., Jedicke, R., Mor- bidelli, A., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Levison, H. F., Dec. 2005. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179, 63–94. Bottke, W. F., Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Morbidelli, A., Mar. 2010. The Irregular Satellites: The Most Colli- sionally Evolved Populations in the Solar System. AJ139, 994–1014. Brown, M. E., May 2001. The Inclination Distribution of the Kuiper Belt. AJ 121, 2804–2814. Brown, M. E., 2008. The Largest Kuiper Belt Objects. pp. 335–344. Davis, D. R., Durda, D. D., Marzari, F., Campo Bagatin, A., Gil-Hutton, R., 2002. Collisional Evolution of Small-Body Populations. Asteroids III, 545–558. Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., Clancy, K. B., Gulbis, A. A. S., Mil- lis, R. L., Buie, M. W., Wasserman, L. H., Chiang, E. I., Jordan, A. B., Trilling, D. E., Meech, K. J., Feb. 2005. The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population. AJ 129, 1117–1162. Fraser, W. C., Nov. 2009. The Collisional Divot in the Kuiper Belt Size Distribution. ApJ706, 119–129. Fraser, W. C., Kavelaars, J. J., Jan. 2009. The Size Distri- bution of Kuiper Belt Objects for D gsim 10 km. AJ137, 72–82. Fraser, W. C., Kavelaars, J. J., Holman, M. J., Pritchet, C. J., Gladman, B. J., Grav, T., Jones, R. L., Macwilliams, J., Petit, J.-M., Jun. 2008. The Kuiper belt luminosity function from mR = 21to26. Icarus 195, 827– 843. Fuentes, C. I., George, M. R., Holman, M. J., May 2009. A Subaru Pencil-Beam Search for mR 27 Trans-Neptunian Bodies. ApJ696, 91–95. Fuentes, C. I., Holman, M. J., Jul. 2008. a SUBARU Archival Search for Faint Trans-Neptunian Objects. AJ136, 83–97. Gladman, B., Chan, C., Jun. 2006. Production of the Ex- tended Scattered Disk by Rogue Planets. ApJL643, L135– L138. Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J., Petit, J.-M., Morbidelli, A., Holman, M. J., Loredo, T., Aug. 2001. The Structure of the Kuiper Belt: Size Distribution and Radial Extent. AJ 122, 1051–1066. Gomes, R. S., Feb. 2003. The origin of the Kuiper Belt high- inclination population. Icarus 161, 404–418. index. ISBN : 0521750334. Schlichting, H. E., Ofek, E. O., Wenz, M., Sari, R., Gal-Yam, A., Livio, M., Nelan, E., Zucker, S., Dec. 2009. A single sub-kilometre Kuiper belt object from a stellar occulta- tion in archival data. Nature462, 895–897. Smith, J. A., Tucker, D. L., Kent, S., Richmond, M. W., Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Ichikawa, S.-i., Jorgensen, A. M., Uomoto, A., Gunn, J. E., Hamabe, M., Watanabe, M., Tolea, A., Henden, A., Annis, J., Pier, J. R., McKay, T. A., Brinkmann, J., Chen, B., Holtzman, J., Shimasaku, K., York, D. G., Apr. 2002. The u'g'r'i'z' Standard-Star System. AJ 123, 2121–2144. Stansberry, J., Grundy, W., Brown, M., Cruikshank, D., Spencer, J., Trilling, D., Margot, J.-L., 2008. Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Con- straints from the Spitzer Space Telescope. pp. 161–179. Stephens, D. C., Noll, K. S., Feb. 2006. Detection of Six Trans-Neptunian Binaries with NICMOS: A High Frac- tion of Binaries in the Cold Classical Disk. AJ131, 1142– 1148. Stern, S. A., Sep. 1996. On the Collisional Environment, Accretion Time Scales, and Architecture of the Massive, Primordial Kuiper Belt. AJ112, 1203–+. Stern, S. A., Colwell, J. E., Aug. 1997. Accretion in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt: Forming 100-1000 KM Radius Bodies at 30 AU and Beyond. AJ114, 841–+. Tancredi, G., Fern´andez, J. A., Rickman, H., Licandro, J., Jun. 2006. Nuclear magnitudes and the size distribution of Jupiter family comets. Icarus 182, 527–549. Tegler, S. C., Romanishin, W., Oct. 2000. Extremely red Kuiper-belt objects in near-circular orbits beyond 40 AU. Nature407, 979–981. Trujillo, C. A., Brown, M. E., Feb. 2002. A Correlation be- tween Inclination and Color in the Classical Kuiper Belt. ApJL566, L125–L128. Trujillo, C. A., Brown, M. E., Jun. 2003. The Caltech Wide Area Sky Survey. Earth Moon and Planets 92, 99–112. Trujillo, C. A., Jewitt, D. C., Luu, J. X., Feb. 2000. Popula- tion of the Scattered Kuiper Belt. ApJL529, L103–L106. Volk, K., Malhotra, R., Nov. 2008. The Scattered Disk as the Source of the Jupiter Family Comets. ApJ687, 714–725. Weissman, P. R., Snodgrass, C., Fitzsimmons, A., Lowry, S. C., Sep. 2009. The Size Distribution of Jupiter-Family Comet Nuclei. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. Vol. 41 of AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. pp. 23.13–+. Gulbis, A. A. S., Elliot, J. L., Adams, E. R., Benecchi, S. D., Buie, M. W., Trilling, D. E., Wasserman, L. H., Aug. 2010. Unbiased Inclination Distributions for Objects in the Kuiper Belt. AJ140, 350–369. Gwyn, S. D. J., Feb. 2008. MegaPipe: The MegaCam Im- age Stacking Pipeline at the Canadian Astronomical Data Centre. PASP120, 212–223. Jedicke, R., Metcalfe, T. S., Feb. 1998. The Orbital and Absolute Magnitude Distributions of Main Belt Asteroids. Icarus 131, 245–260. Jewitt, D. C., Sheppard, S. S., Apr. 2002. Physical Proper- ties of Trans-Neptunian Object (20000) Varuna. AJ123, 2110–2120. Jewitt, D. C., Trujillo, C. A., Luu, J. X., Aug. 2000. Pop- ulation and Size Distribution of Small Jovian Trojan As- teroids. AJ120, 1140–1147. Kenyon, S. J., Mar. 2002. Planet Formation in the Outer Solar System. PASP 114, 265–283. Kenyon, S. J., Bromley, B. C., Oct. 2004. The Size Distribu- tion of Kuiper Belt Objects. AJ 128, 1916–1926. Kenyon, S. J., Luu, J. X., May 1998. Accretion in the Early Kuiper Belt. I. Coagulation and Velocity Evolution. AJ115, 2136–2160. Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A., Vanlaerhoven, C., Gomes, R., Tsiganis, K., Jul. 2008. Origin of the structure of the Kuiper belt during a dynamical instability in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Icarus 196, 258–273. Levison, H. F., Stern, S. A., Mar. 2001. On the Size Depen- dence of the Inclination Distribution of the Main Kuiper Belt. AJ121, 1730–1735. Lykawka, P. S., Mukai, T., Apr. 2008. An Outer Planet Be- yond Pluto and the Origin of the Trans-Neptunian Belt Architecture. AJ135, 1161–1200. Malhotra, R., Oct. 1993. The Origin of Pluto's Peculiar Or- bit. Nature365, 819–+. Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Sekiguchi, M., Okamura, S., Doi, M., Furusawa, H., Hamabe, M., Imi, K., Kimura, M., Nakata, F., Okada, N., Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Yagi, M., Yasuda, N., Dec. 2002. Subaru Prime Focus Camera – Suprime-Cam. pasj54, 833–853. Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Bottke, W. F., Dones, L., Nesvorn´y, D., Jul. 2009. Considerations on the magni- tude distributions of the Kuiper belt and of the Jupiter Trojans. Icarus 202, 310–315. Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Gomes, R., 2008. The Dy- namical Structure of the Kuiper Belt and Its Primordial Origin. The Solar System Beyond Neptune, pp. 275–292. Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., May 2005. Chaotic capture of Jupiter's Trojan asteroids in the early Solar System. Nature435, 462–465. Nesvorn´y, D., Vokrouhlick´y, D., Jun. 2009. Chaotic Capture of Neptune Trojans. AJ137, 5003–5011. O'Brien, D. P., Greenberg, R., Aug. 2003. Steady-state size distributions for collisional populations:analytical solu- tion with size-dependent strength. Icarus 164, 334–345. Parker, A. H., Kavelaars, J., Apr. 2010. Pencil-Beam Surveys for Trans-Neptunian Objects: Limits on Distant Popula- tions. ArXiv e-prints. Peixinho, N., Lacerda, P., Jewitt, D., Nov. 2008. Color- Inclination Relation of the Classical Kuiper Belt Objects. AJ136, 1837–1845. Press, W. H., 2002. Numerical recipes in C++ : the art of scientific computing. Numerical recipes in C++ : the art of scientific computing by William H. Press. xxviii, 1,002 p. : ill. ; 26 cm. Includes bibliographical references and 13 Right Ascension Declination 01:45:59.0 +10:03:00.0 +11:24:00.0 01:46:29.7 +10:30:00.0 01:48:27.6 +11:51:00.0 01:48:59.1 01:50:46.1 +10:30:00.0 +11:24:00.0 01:51:07.5 +12:18:00.0 01:51:29.0 +12:45:00.0 01:51:39.8 01:52:53.7 +10:03:00.0 +10:57:00.0 01:53:15.5 +11:51:00.0 01:53:37.3 +12:18:00.0 01:53:48.3 +13:12:00.0 01:54:10.4 01:55:34.1 +10:57:00.0 +11:24:00.0 01:55:45.3 +13:12:00.0 01:56:30.2 +11:51:00.0 01:58:15.6 01:58:50.0 +13:12:00.0 +11:51:00.0 02:00:34.7 +11:51:00.0 02:07:32.1 +12:18:00.0 02:07:44.5 02:07:56.8 +12:45:00.0 +13:12:00.0 02:08:09.3 +11:51:00.0 02:09:51.3 +12:45:00.0 02:10:16.4 02:12:23.2 +12:18:00.0 +13:39:00.0 02:13:01.8 +13:12:00.0 02:15:08.7 +13:39:00.0 02:15:21.8 02:17:15.2 +12:45:00.0 +13:12:00.0 02:17:28.5 +12:45:00.0 02:21:54.3 +13:39:00.0 02:22:21.9 02:22:35.8 +14:06:00.0 +12:45:00.0 02:24:13.9 Table 1: Suprime-cam Discovery field centers. Coordinates are presented in the J2000 epoch. 14 Object 1 obj 0 obj 1 obj 2 Nobj 3 obj 4 Nobj 5 obj 6 obj 7 Nobj 8 obj 9 Nobj 10 Nobj 11 Nobj 12 obj 13 obj 14 obj 15 obj 16 Nobj 17 Nobj 18 obj 19 Nobj 20 Nobj 21 obj 22 Nobj 23 obj 24 obj 25 obj 26 Nobj 27 2004 VT75 3 obj 29 Nobj 30 Nobj 31 Nobj 32 Nobj 33 Nobj 34 Nobj 35 obj 36 obj 37 obj 38 Nobj 39 Nobj 40 Nobj 41 obj 42 obj 43 Nobj 44 obj 45 Nobj 46 Nobj 47 obj 48 Nobj 49 r′ Subaru 25.2 ± 0.1 24.55 ± 0.07 24.75 ± 0.08 23.99 ± 0.05 24.71 ± 0.08 24.44 ± 0.07 23.5 ± 0.04 24.83 ± 0.09 23.74 ± 0.04 24.33 ± 0.07 23.02 ± 0.03 24.19 ± 0.05 23.55 ± 0.04 24.63 ± 0.08 24.1 ± 0.05 24.9 ± 0.09 25.0 ± 0.1 21.65 ± 0.02 24.43 ± 0.06 24.88 ± 0.09 24.01 ± 0.05 23.82 ± 0.04 24.65 ± 0.08 23.96 ± 0.05 24.75 ± 0.08 24.86 ± 0.09 25.0 ± 0.1 24.33 ± 0.06 21.92 ± 0.03 23.65 ± 0.04 24.36 ± 0.06 23.86 ± 0.04 22.07 ± 0.02 23.83 ± 0.04 23.53 ± 0.05 22.9 ± 0.03 21.57 ± 0.02 22.51 ± 0.02 24.52 ± 0.07 23.9 ± 0.05 23.25 ± 0.03 23.77 ± 0.05 24.26 ± 0.06 24.74 ± 0.08 24.18 ± 0.05 24.55 ± 0.07 23.83 ± 0.04 24.31 ± 0.06 25.3 ± 0.2 23.85 ± 0.04 r′ SDSS (gSDSS − r′ SDSS) 25.0 ± 0.1 24.52 ± 0.07 24.72 ± 0.08 24.02 ± 0.05 24.65 ± 0.08 24.45 ± 0.05 23.47 ± 0.04 24.78 ± 0.09 23.73 ± 0.04 24.29 ± 0.07 22.98 ± 0.03 24.15 ± 0.05 23.55 ± 0.04 24.55 ± 0.07 24.07 ± 0.05 24.88 ± 0.09 24.96 ± 0.1 21.63 ± 0.02 24.25 ± 0.06 24.86 ± 0.09 24.0 ± 0.05 23.79 ± 0.04 24.62 ± 0.08 23.96 ± 0.05 24.7 ± 0.08 24.82 ± 0.09 25.0 ± 0.1 24.38 ± 0.05 21.9 ± 0.03 23.62 ± 0.04 24.29 ± 0.06 23.78 ± 0.04 22.08 ± 0.02 23.79 ± 0.04 23.54 ± 0.04 22.88 ± 0.03 21.55 ± 0.02 22.49 ± 0.03 24.49 ± 0.07 23.91 ± 0.04 23.21 ± 0.03 23.74 ± 0.05 24.23 ± 0.06 24.72 ± 0.08 24.15 ± 0.05 24.42 ± 0.07 23.8 ± 0.04 24.27 ± 0.05 25.1 ± 0.1 23.78 ± 0.04 - - - 0.46 ± 0.09 - 0.72 ± 0.09 - - 0.4 ± 0.1 - 0.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.53 ± 0.08 - - - - 0.6 ± 0.09 0.9 ± 0.1 - 0.45 ± 0.09 0.4 ± 0.09 - 0.5 ± 0.1 - - - 0.33 ± 0.07 - - 0.6 ± 0.1 0.69 ± 0.09 0.36 ± 0.09 0.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.47 ± 0.08 - - - 0.58 ± 0.09 0.66 ± 0.09 0.66 ± 0.09 - - 0.38 ± 0.09 - 0.5 ± 0.1 0.57 ± 0.09 - 0.56 ± 0.09 15 R (AU) 2 42.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 40.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 43.5 ± 0.2 35.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 3.0 45.0 ± 3.0 35.0 ± 2.0 42.0 ± 3.0 39.6 ± 0.4 41.0 ± 3.0 40.0 ± 3.0 32.0 ± 2.0 30.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 38.5 ± 0.1 45.0 ± 2.0 36.0 ± 3.0 44.0 ± 3.0 39.0 ± 5.0 46.0 ± 3.0 37.0 ± 2.0 42.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 38.0 ± 3.0 37.55 30.0 ± 3.0 46.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 2.0 39.39 ± 0.01 38.0 ± 2.0 37.0 ± 2.0 36.2 ± 0.1 36.0 ± 3.0 32.0 ± 3.0 32.0 ± 2.0 43.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 2.0 43.0 ± 3.0 32.0 ± 3.0 46.0 ± 3.0 46.0 ± 3.0 47.0 ± 3.0 37.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 0.2 19.0 ± 4.0 44.0 ± 3.0 i (o) 2 10.0 ± 9.0 2.0 ± 8.0 20.0 ± 10.0 4.0 ± 2.0 1.0 ± 6.0 0.7 ± 0.03 6.0 ± 7.0 15.0 ± 10.0 1.67 ± 0.01 2.0 ± 6.0 6.0 ± 2.0 7.3 ± 0.6 30.0 ± 10.0 5.0 ± 8.0 3.0 ± 5.0 30.0 ± 20.0 1.0 ± 8.0 9.6 ± 0.2 0.97 ± 0.01 9.0 ± 7.0 0.7 ± 0.2 40.0 ± 30.0 10.0 ± 10.0 1.7 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 8.0 3.0 ± 8.0 2.0 ± 8.0 23.0 ± 9.0 12.823 19.0 ± 9.0 2.2 ± 0.8 4.0 ± 1.0 9.45 ± 0.01 5.0 ± 2.0 10.0 ± 4.0 20.9 ± 0.4 14.0 ± 8.0 20.0 ± 10.0 11.0 ± 7.0 2.9 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 1.0 30.0 ± 10.0 8.0 ± 10.0 2.8 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 10.0 18.0 ± 7.0 0.871 ± 0.002 40.0 ± 30.0 7.0 ± 2.0 Nobj 50 obj 51 obj 52 Nobj 53 obj 54 obj 55 Nobj 56 obj 57 obj 58 Nobj 59 obj 60 Nobj 61 Nobj 62 obj 63 obj 64 Nobj 65 obj 66 Nobj 67 Nobj 68 obj 69 obj 70 obj 71 Nobj 72 Nobj 73 Nobj 74 obj 75 obj 76 Nobj 77 Nobj 78 obj 79 obj 80 obj 81 Nobj 82 obj 83 obj 84 obj 85 Nobj 86 obj 87 25.2 ± 0.1 25.1 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 25.0 ± 0.1 25.1 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.66 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.09 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23.57 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.09 0.44 ± 0.09 24.47 ± 0.07 23.92 ± 0.06 24.95 ± 0.1 24.98 ± 0.1 24.35 ± 0.06 24.84 ± 0.09 24.44 ± 0.07 24.05 ± 0.05 23.64 ± 0.05 24.16 ± 0.07 23.68 ± 0.04 24.54 ± 0.07 23.3 ± 0.03 24.29 ± 0.06 24.44 ± 0.06 23.81 ± 0.04 24.65 ± 0.08 24.53 ± 0.07 23.85 ± 0.04 23.91 ± 0.05 23.94 ± 0.05 24.41 ± 0.08 45.0 ± 2.0 34.0 ± 2.0 35.0 ± 3.0 46.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 47.0 ± 3.0 43.0 ± 3.0 24.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 0.1 28.0 ± 2.0 42.0 ± 2.0 43.0 ± 3.0 22.0 ± 2.0 42.0 ± 3.0 43.5 ± 0.1 20.0 ± 8.0 45.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 3.0 34.0 ± 2.0 44.0 ± 2.0 44.0 ± 2.0 41.0 ± 2.0 36.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 42.3 ± 0.1 42.0 ± 3.0 50.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 33.0 ± 2.0 43.1 ± 0.1 35.0 ± 3.0 41.0 ± 3.0 30.0 ± 3.0 42.0 ± 3.0 45.0 ± 3.0 Table 2: Discovery Subaru magnitudes and Sloan magnitudes. 23.53 ± 0.04 24.95 ± 0.1 24.41 ± 0.07 23.81 ± 0.06 24.78 ± 0.09 24.93 ± 0.1 24.27 ± 0.06 24.81 ± 0.09 24.9 ± 0.1 24.22 ± 0.05 24.01 ± 0.05 23.57 ± 0.05 24.21 ± 0.06 23.65 ± 0.04 24.52 ± 0.07 23.27 ± 0.03 24.26 ± 0.06 24.36 ± 0.06 23.74 ± 0.04 24.57 ± 0.08 24.5 ± 0.07 23.82 ± 0.05 23.88 ± 0.05 23.83 ± 0.05 24.68 ± 0.06 25.1 ± 0.1 24.6 ± 0.08 22.72 ± 0.03 23.71 ± 0.04 24.78 ± 0.09 24.54 ± 0.07 24.01 ± 0.05 24.13 ± 0.05 22.95 ± 0.03 24.94 ± 0.1 24.52 ± 0.07 23.84 ± 0.04 25.1 ± 0.1 24.68 ± 0.08 22.74 ± 0.03 23.74 ± 0.04 24.85 ± 0.09 24.58 ± 0.07 24.03 ± 0.05 24.19 ± 0.05 23.06 ± 0.03 24.98 ± 0.1 24.54 ± 0.07 23.87 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.35 ± 0.08 0.6 ± 0.1 0.67 ± 0.09 0.67 ± 0.09 0.64 ± 0.09 - - - - - - - - - 0.78 ± 0.09 0.68 ± 0.09 4.0 ± 1.0 5.0 ± 6.0 4.0 ± 6.0 2.2 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 8.0 2.0 ± 8.0 3.0 ± 1.0 20.0 ± 10.0 30.0 ± 10.0 2.14 ± 0.05 6.0 ± 5.0 2.9 ± 0.9 13.0 ± 5.0 14.0 ± 7.0 2.0 ± 7.0 0.82 ± 0.01 70.0 ± 80.0 1.6 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 1.0 3.0 ± 8.0 4.0 ± 8.0 3.0 ± 5.0 1.4 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.8 4.0 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 5.0 2.0 ± 8.0 1.24 ± 0.02 2.1 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 6.0 5.0 ± 8.0 6.0 ± 6.0 0.31 ± 0.01 30.0 ± 10.0 2.0 ± 8.0 17.0 ± 9.0 2.1 ± 0.6 8.0 ± 9.0 1Objects prefaced with N and D have follow-up observations in November and December respectively. 2Barycentric Distance and ecliptic inclination determined from fit radec (Bernstein and Khushalani, 2000). 3Object distance and inclination taken from the Minor Planet Center. 16 Table 3: Best-fit power-law parameters. Sample TNO Cold F Cold Hot F Hot Close α 0.56 ± 0.1 0.82 ± 0.23 0.79 ± 0.20 0.35 ± 0.21 0.35 ± 0.19 0.40 ± 0.15 mo(r′) 22.9 ± 0.4 23.8 ± 0.3 23.8 ± 0.3 24.3 ± 0.7 24.3 ± 0.7 23.6 ± 0.6 P (∆ > ∆obs) 0.64 0.28 0.47 0.75 0.65 0.68 Table 4: The slopes of the TNO , Hot , Cold , and Close samples (rows 3, 5, and 6) are likely a few percent steeper than in actuality. This bias however, is much smaller than the uncertainties of those parameters (see Section 3.2). Fig. Captions Fig. 1. Diagram of the fields observed for moving objects during the Subaru observations. These fields were chosen to avoid bright stars. The field center coordinates are presented in Table 1. Fig 2. Point source full-width at half maximum versus hour angle of all Subaru discovery observations. Fig 3. Extinction versus airmass for the Subaru discovery observations. Each point is the average difference in magnitude of bright stars between common fields; each of the 35 discovery triplets has two data points. The line is the best-fit linear extinction law, with slope 0.08 magnitudes per unit airmass. These data demonstrate the photometric nature of the discovery observations. Fig 4. Detection efficiency versus artificial source r′ Subaru magnitude. Error-bars are 1-sigma poisson limits. Best-fit parameters of the efficiency function given by Equation 2 are presented at the top of the figure. Fig 5. Detection efficiency versus artificial object inclination. From top to bottom, all planted sources, and those with r'< 23, 23 < r' < 24, 24 < r' < 26. This figure demonstrates that, given a particular object magnitude, our survey was equally sensitive to all inclinations. Fig 6. Detection efficiency versus artificial object heliocentric distance. From top to bottom, all planted sources, and those with r'< 23, 23 < r' < 24, 24 < r' < 26. This figure demonstrates that, given a particular object magnitude, no significant variation of detection efficiency with distance is apparent. Exceptions are at the extrema of the survey; our search was only sensitive to objects with apparent motions 0.2 − 10"/hr roughly corresponding to distances 15 ≤ r ≤ 800 AU. Fig 7. Sloan colour versus inclination for those objects which received follow-up observations. Fig 8. The differential luminosity functions of the various samples defined in Section 3.1 offset in units of 2 for clarity. Diamonds: TNO . Squares: Cold F . Triangles: Hot F . Circles: Close . Error-bars are the 1-σ poisson limits for the number of objects in each bin. Lines are the best-fit power-laws, with values given in Table 3. Fig 9. The 1 (solid), 2 (dashed) and 3-σ (dotted) likelihood contours of the fits presented in Figure 8 and Table 3. The corresponding subsample is labeled in the top right of each panel. Fig 10. Best-fit slopes α of the Cold (squares) and Hot (circles) populations versus the inclination division idiv separating the two. Left is using only those objects with follow-up. Right is using all observations. The 1-σ range in αClose is bracketed by the two horizontal lines. 17 Figure 1: 18 Figure 2: 19 Figure 3: 20 Figure 4: 21 Figure 5: 22 Figure 6: 23 Figure 7: 24 Figure 8: 25 Figure 9: 26 Figure 10: 27
1603.07071	1	1603	2016-03-23T05:10:18	Dynamical Evidence for a Late Formation of Saturn's Moons	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We explore the past evolution of Saturn's moons using direct numerical integrations. We find that the past Tethys-Dione 3:2 orbital resonance predicted in standard models likely did not occur, implying that the system is less evolved than previously thought. On the other hand, the orbital inclinations of Tethys, Dione and Rhea suggest that the system did cross the Dione-Rhea 5:3 resonance, which is closely followed by a Tethys-Dione secular resonance. A clear implication is that either the moons are significantly younger than the planet, or that their tidal evolution must be extremely slow (Q > 80,000). As an extremely slow-evolving system is incompatible with intense tidal heating of Enceladus, we conclude that the moons interior to Titan are not primordial, and we present a plausible scenario for the system's recent formation. We propose that the mid-sized moons re-accreted from a disk about 100 Myr ago, during which time Titan acquired its significant orbital eccentricity. We speculate that this disk has formed through orbital instability and massive collisions involving the previous generation of Saturn's mid-sized moons. We identify the solar evection resonance perturbing a pair of mid-sized moons as the most likely trigger of such an instability. This scenario implies that most craters on the moons interior to Titan must have been formed by planetocentric impactors.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Dynamical Evidence for a Late Formation of Saturn's Moons Matija ´Cuk Carl Sagan Center, SETI Institute, 189 North Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043 [email protected] Luke Dones Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302 and David Nesvorn´y Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302 Received ; accepted Revised and submitted to The Astrophysical Journal 6 1 0 2 r a M 3 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 1 7 0 7 0 . 3 0 6 1 : v i X r a – 2 – ABSTRACT We explore the past evolution of Saturn's moons using direct numerical in- tegrations. We find that the past Tethys-Dione 3:2 orbital resonance predicted in standard models likely did not occur, implying that the system is less evolved than previously thought. On the other hand, the orbital inclinations of Tethys, Dione and Rhea suggest that the system did cross the Dione-Rhea 5:3 resonance, which is closely followed by a Tethys-Dione secular resonance. A clear implica- tion is that either the moons are significantly younger than the planet, or that their tidal evolution must be extremely slow (Q > 80, 000). As an extremely slow-evolving system is incompatible with intense tidal heating of Enceladus, we conclude that the moons interior to Titan are not primordial, and we present a plausible scenario for the system's recent formation. We propose that the mid-sized moons re-accreted from a disk about 100 Myr ago, during which time Titan acquired its significant orbital eccentricity. We speculate that this disk has formed through orbital instability and massive collisions involving the previous generation of Saturn's mid-sized moons. We identify the solar evection resonance perturbing a pair of mid-sized moons as the most likely trigger of such an insta- bility. This scenario implies that most craters on the moons interior to Titan must have been formed by planetocentric impactors. Subject headings: planets and satellites: formation – planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability – planets and satellites: individual (Tethys, Dione, Rhea, Titan) – 3 – 1. Introduction One of the most important results of the Cassini mission to Saturn was the discovery of a high heat flow from the south polar region of Enceladus (Porco et al. 2006). This heat flow is estimated at 10-15 GW (Howett et al. 2011, 2014), which is by an order of magnitude in excess of theoretical predictions assuming a dynamically steady state (Meyer & Wisdom 2007). A dynamical equilibrium means that Enceladus maintains a constant orbital eccentricity, which corresponds to an equilibrium between excitation by the 2:1 orbital resonance with Dione and damping by tidal dissipation within Enceladus. When calculating this dynamical equilibrium, Meyer & Wisdom (2007) assumed that the strength of tidal dissipation within Saturn (which pushes Enceladus into the orbital resonance) can be quantified by a tidal quality factor Q = 18, 000, as suggested by Sinclair (1983). Tidal Q = 18, 000 corresponds to the strongest tidal response by Saturn that is still consistent with Mimas not evolving past its current location over 4.5 Gyr (Sinclair 1983; Murray & Dermott 1999). Any larger tidal evolution rates (corresponding to smaller tidal Qs) would place Mimas within Saturn's rings less than 4.5 Gyr ago. There are other possible approaches to constraining the tidal response of Saturn. One is direct observation of the moons' tidal acceleration. Secular expansion of satellite orbits with orbital periods longer than the planet's spin period is predicted by tidal theories (Murray & Dermott 1999) but was previously thought to be too slow for detection. Recently, Lainey et al. (2012) re-analyzed a large number of historical observations of Saturn's moons and found tidal recession corresponding to Q = 1700 ± 500. More recent preliminary results using Cassini-based and ground-based observations of the satellites apparently support the idea of such fast tidal evolution of Saturn's moons (Lainey et al. 2015). Lainey et al. (2012) also point out that Q ≃ 1700 matches what is required for Enceladus to be in tidal equilibrium and still produce the observed heat flux. However, – 4 – such fast tidal rates would require the inner moons like Mimas to have formed less than about 0.5 Gyr ago (as they would have otherwise migrated past their present positions, assuming the Q of Saturn did not change over time). Theoretical models of Saturn's interior dissipation are also available, but they are not conclusive to this debate, as there is a basic disagreement about whether the dissipation happens in the core or the envelope (Ogilvie 2014; Remus et al. 2015; Storch & Lai 2015). We can also constrain Saturn's tidal response by theoretical modeling of present and past orbital resonances between different moons. Low Q (i.e. a high rate of dissipation) of Saturn on the order of Q = 1700 would make the apparent highly-evolved state of the Titan-Hyperion resonance a natural product of tidal evolution over the age of the Solar System (Greenberg 1973a; ´Cuk et al. 2013), whereas in the classical picture the resonance had to be primordial, as it would not have not changed significantly over 4.5 Gyr (Peale 1999). Here we address the two most important orbital resonances that have likely happened in the past: the 3:2 mean-motion resonance (MMR) between Tethys and Dione, and the 5:3 MMR between Dione and Rhea. These resonances should have happened close in time about 1.1 Gyr ago if Q = 18, 000 (Murray & Dermott 1999; Meyer & Wisdom 2007), or about 100 Myr ago if Q = 1700. The 3:2 Tethys-Dione resonance has previously been studied using semi-analytical methods, which found substantial excitation of the two moons' orbital eccentricities, but ignored orbital inclinations (Zhang & Nimmo 2012). This likely eccentricity excitation was also suggested to be related to geological features on Tethys that indicate past tidal heating (Chen & Nimmo 2008). Unlike eccentricities, which damp over time by tides, the moons' orbital inclinations cannot be easily erased once they are excited (Chen et al. 2014). Therefore, it is essential to probe the effects of possible past resonances on the moons' inclinations, using methods that account for the full dynamics of the system. – 5 – 2. Numerical Methods In this work we use two different numerical integrators, simpl and complex. Simpl is relatively efficient, but cannot model close approaches between massive bodies and is applicable only to the situations where the moons' orbits are well-separated. Complex is capable of integrating close encounters between moons, but has a downside of being much slower than simpl. With a goal of studying the long-term tidal evolution of Saturn's moons, we wrote a new symplectic integrator, simpl (Symplectic Integrator for Moons and PLanets). This is a combination of two Levison-Duncan-type integrators (Levison & Duncan 1994), one for the planets and one for the moons of one planet. This type of integrator is a "democratic heliocentric" (i.e. uses heliocentric coordinates and does not require strict ordering of planets) version of the mixed-variable symplectic integrator of Wisdom & Holman (1991), which assumes bodies follow Keplerian orbits and implements perturbations as discrete "kicks" executed in Cartesian coordinates. We adapted the specific algorithm from Chambers et al. (2002), who designed it to model the dynamics of planets around one component of a binary star. simpl directly includes mutual moon-moon interactions, as well as solar and planetary perturbations (direct planetary perturbations can be switched off to speed up computations; back reaction of satellites on planets is ignored). We also include the planet's oblateness, tides raised on the planet by the satellite (as a simple tangential acceleration on the moon in the plane of its orbit, not changing the planet's rotation) and satellite tides (implemented as radial-only kicks), and artificial planetary or satellite migration (to approximate interaction with protoplanetary or protosatellite disks). When calculating tidal accelerations, we assumed that the tidal quality factor Q of Saturn was independent of the satellite's orbital frequency (i.e. all the moons experienced the same Q for Saturn). We extensively validated simpl against published results and analytical – 6 – estimates, and found that all precessional motions and secular tidal effects are reproduced correctly. To integrate the orbits of moons like Tethys and Dione with orbital periods of 2-3 days, we used a 0.1 day (2.5 × 10−4 yr) integration time-step. This is the timestep we used in most simulations shown in this paper, unless otherwise noted. We always included Titan in our simulations, and we usually included only Jupiter and Saturn in the heliocentric part of the integration. complex (Crossing Orbit Moon and PLanet EXtrapolator) is a more basic type of symplectic integrator, in which the Hamiltonian is not separated into Keplerian and perturbation parts (as in simpl) but into kinetic and potential energy. The exact implementation has been taken from Forest & Ruth (1990), and uses a fourth order algorithm. complex uses many of the same subroutines as simpl and the same input and output files, except that simpl's Keplerian step has been replaced by a sequence of symplectic mappings in Cartesian coordinates. The subroutines in simpl that implement perturbations from other bodies, the planet's figure and tidal deformations have been incorporated into the symplectic mapping, in the sub-step where the momenta are being modified due to potential energy. complex has no preference for Keplerian orbits, and can therefore resolve close approaches between the moons naturally. The downside of complex is its much slower speed, requiring about 600 timesteps for the shortest orbital period. For the sake of simplicity, we decided to use the same routines to integrate the satellites and the planets in complex, although the planetary orbits could in principle be done more efficiently. Overall, complex is about two orders of magnitude slower than simpl, and we used it only when the satellite system went through an instability. Short collision times between moons (centuries to millennia) keep the relative inefficiency of complex from becoming a – 7 – major issue. The switching between simpl and complex was done manually, meaning that we go back to the state of a simpl simulation just before the instability and continue the simulation using complex. While the timestep of complex was sufficiently small to resolve close approaches, it was still too large to reliably resolve collisions. Therefore we shrunk the timestep by an additional factor of 20 when two moons were between 10 combined radii from each other. Once again, relatively large collisional cross sections of the moons compared to the sizes of their orbits made this relatively inefficient method workable. Note that this approach would not work for simulations of planets interacting with small bodies, where special treatment for the two bodies undergoing the close encounter (Levison & Duncan 1994) makes more sense than slowing down the whole integration. 3. Tethys-Dione 3:2 Resonance The period ratio of Dione and Tethys is currently about 1.45, so, as Tethys evolves outward much faster than Dione, these two moons should have crossed their mutual 3:2 resonance at some point in the past. In this section we use the symplectic numerical integrator simpl to explore the Tethys-Dione 3:2 resonance crossing. The benefit of the numerical approach is that all sub-resonances, including the inclination-related ones, are fully accounted for. Figure 1 shows a typical evolution of eccentricities and inclinations of Tethys and Dione during the resonance crossing, assuming that both moons' orbits were close to circular and equatorial before the resonant encounter. The moons are originally captured in a sub-resonance which leads to a monotonic growth of the inclination of Tethys. Once Tethys's inclination grows to about 4◦, the resonance becomes chaotic and eccentricities and inclinations of both moons vary rapidly. Eventually the resonant lock breaks, leaving both orbits significantly eccentric and inclined. While the eccentricities – 8 – can damp due to eccentricity tides, the inclinations of Saturn's mid-sized moons are not expected to evolve appreciably over the age of the Solar System (Chen et al. 2014). The final inclination of Dione is always substantial, typically comparable to a degree (Fig. 5), while the observed inclination of Dione is only 0.028◦ (Table 1). We used Q/k2 = 4000 for Saturn in almost all the simulations is this paper, which is equivalent to Q = 1360, as Saturn's Love number is estimated to be k2=0.341 (Gavrilov & Zharkov 1977)1. For the satellites, we used Q = 100 and k2 = 0.05 in the simulation shown in Figure 1, which implies at least some melting, as expected when eccentricities reach a few percent (Chen & Nimmo 2008). A more detailed model would have tidal parameters varying with tidal heating, but our integrator did not include that capability. Instead, we explored a range of constant tidal parameters for the satellites. Given that Enceladus seems to currently have very low Q/k2 (if Enceladus's orbit is in equilibrium as proposed by Lainey et al. 2012), we also integrated the resonance crossing using Q = 100, k2 = 0.5 (Figure 2). Despite strong tidal dissipation, the inclination of Dione is still excited during the crossing. One can in principle imagine an even stronger tidal response from Tethys or Dione (with Q/k2 ≃ 10), but these would cause Tethys to move inwards due to satellite tides being faster than the outward migration due to Saturn tides (for eccentricities of the order e = 0.01). Such a reversal of migration would effectively prohibit Tethys from crossing the resonance with Dione and reaching the present configuration (cf. Eq. 1). We found it impractical to directly model resonance crossing in the "classical" case when Q=18,000 for Saturn, as the integrations would need to be extended to many hundreds of Myr. However, chaotic excitation of both the eccentricity and inclination is expected to 1Lainey et al. (2015) find k2 = 0.390 ± 0.024 for Saturn; this Love number would require Q of Saturn in our simulations to also be 10-20% larger – 9 – Tethys Dione y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (Myr) Time (Myr) Fig. 1.- A simulation of Tethys and Dione encountering their mutual 3:2 resonance, using our integrator simpl. The tidal response of Saturn was Q/k2 = 4000, while the satellites were assumed to have tidal parameters Q = 100 and k2 = 0.05. We assumed that both moons had low eccentricities and inclinations before the resonance occurred. At first the moons are captured in the i2 1 4:2 inclination-type resonance, but eventually resonance overlap occurs. Tethys and Dione both exit the resonance with substantial eccentricity and inclination. – 10 – y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Tethys 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (Myr) 60 70 80 Dione 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (Myr) 60 70 80 Fig. 2.- Same as Fig 1, only with Q/k2 = 200 assumed for both moons. y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Tethys 0 1 2 3 4 Time (Myr) 5 6 Dione 0 1 2 3 4 Time (Myr) 5 6 Fig. 3.- Same as Fig. 1, only with initial i = 1◦ assumed for Tethys. – 11 – y t i c i r t n e c c E ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Dione Tethys 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (Myr) Time (Myr) Fig. 4.- Same as Fig. 1, only with initial i = 0.3◦ assumed for Tethys. be even stronger when the resonance is crossed more slowly. If we assume a larger tidal Q for Saturn, a wider range of tidal responses from Tethys would overwhelm Saturn's tides and lead to divergent migration, making the resonance an impassable barrier for Tethys. The ratio between the migration rate due to tidal dissipation within the satellite and the migration rate due to dissipation within the planet is: asat apl = −7e2 Q∗ pl Q∗ sat (cid:16) Mpl Msat (cid:17)2(cid:16)Rsat Rpl (cid:17)2 (1) where subscripts "sat" and "pl" refer to the satellite and the planet, M, R and e are respectively mass, radius and orbital eccentricity, while Q∗ = Q/k2 is the measure of tidal dissipation. For e = 0.01 (typical of eccentricities excited by the Tethys-Dione resonance) and the size and mass of Tethys, we get Q∗ pl/Q∗ sat=0.03 for outward migration to stop. If Q∗ pl = 4000, then Q∗ sat > 120 is necessary for Tethys to continue outward migration. This limit is comparable to the current tidal response of Enceladus inferred by Lainey et al. (2012) by assuming an equilibrium. However, if Q∗ pl = 50, 000, then Q∗ sat > 1500 for the migration to stay convergent, which likely excludes any major melting within Tethys, despite – 12 – 3 1 0.3 0.1 0.03 0.01 0.5 1 2 Inclination of Tethys (°) 5 10 ) ° ( e n o D i f o n o i t a n i l c n I Fig. 5.- Outcome of several simulations of the Tethys-Dione 3:2 resonance crossing. The plot shows the post-resonance inclinations of Tethys (x-axis) and Dione (y-axis). Crosses stand for simulations with initially circular and equatorial orbits, while x's and asterisks plot simulations with circular orbits and initial i = 0.3◦ and i = 1◦ for Tethys, respectively. Coplanar simulations with initial e = 0.01 for Tethys and Dione are plotted by solid and open squares, respectively. A simulation with coplanar and circular orbits but with Q/k2 = 200 for the moons is plotted with an open circle (most other simulations assumed Q/k2 = 2000 for both satellites, and we used Q/k2 = 4000 for Saturn throughout). Multiple simulations with the same initial eccentricities and inclinations had slightly different starting semimajor axes for Tethys. The observed free inclinations of Tethys and Dione are marked with a solid circle, and states reachable by redistributing out-of-plane angular momentum between the two moons are plotted by a solid line. Neither the present orbits not their combined angular momentum deficit are matched by any of the simulations plotted here. – 13 – significant eccentricity (if Q = 100 then k2 would have to be less than 0.07, indicating a relatively rigid body). Without going into modeling the actual physical response of the satellite, we can just use the above considerations to exclude the parameter space with Q∗ pl/Q∗ sat > 0.03 from our consideration, as those parameters would forever trap Tethys on pl > 2× 105, in which case the resonance was never crossed, regardless of satellite tides. However, this extremely the inner side of the 3:2 resonance with Dione. The only exception is Q∗ slow evolution rate is about 40 times too slow to account for the heating of Enceladus, and we prefer the interpretation that the resonance was never crossed because the moons are young. It is possible that the inclination of Tethys was already excited before it encountered the resonance with Dione. Analytical considerations open a possibility that a pre-inclined Tethys could have conceivably avoided capture into the inclination-type resonance evident in Fig. 1 and the associated inclination increase. We tested this possibility using initial inclinations of 1◦ and 0.3◦ for Tethys in multiple simulations. Figs. 3 and 4 each plot the results of one simulation with initial i = 1◦ and i = 0.3◦ for Tethys, respectively. For initial i = 0.3◦ resonance capture still happens, although it usually lasts a much shorter time than in Fig. 1, while for initial i = 1◦ the moons enter the chaotic behavior at the very beginning of the resonance crossing. In all cases the resulting final inclination of Dione is much higher than the observed one (Fig. 5). We also conducted simulations that start with one moon's eccentricity being 0.01. While simulations with initially eccentric Dione did lead to the onset of chaos earlier in the simulation, those with initially eccentric Tethys show no difference from the circular case, chiefly because most of this initial inclination damps by the time chaos is triggered (despite Q/k2 = 104 being used in this run). In all cases the inclinations of both Tethys and Dione are excited well in excess of the observed values (Fig. 5). – 14 – The numerical experiments shown in this section suggest that the inclinations of both Tethys and Dione are excessively excited by the crossing of their 3:2 resonance, regardless of the assumed initial conditions and tidal parameters. In the next section we will discuss possible resonances that could have affected Dione and Tethys later on, but they cannot make a past 3:2 resonance crossing compatible with the present orbits. The solid line in Fig. 5 plots the combinations of inclinations that have the observed out-of-plane angular momentum deficit2 (AMD), and they are all well short of the inclination AMD seen among the simulation outcomes. Capture into additional mean-motion resonances could only increase the AMD of Tethys and Dione, while the secular resonance involving these two moons (see next section) would conserve AMD associated with inclinations. Likewise, chaotic interaction within a mean motion resonance is extremely unlikely to decrease the combined inclinations, but tends to redistribute inclinations on short timescales and increase AMD over time. This applies to subsequent resonances with Enceladus and Mimas; Mimas does have a large inclination but small AMD compared with Tethys due to its small mass, and could not have absorbed out-of-plane AMD from Tethys and Dione. The fact that both Tethys and Dione are always excessively inclined after their 3:2 MMR crossing is a strong constraint on their relative locations at formation, and we will discuss the implications in the following sections. 4. Dione-Rhea 5:3 Resonance and Tethys-Dione Secular Resonance In the relative chronology of resonance crossings in the Saturnian system, the Dione-Rhea 5:3 mean-motion resonance would happen shortly after the 3:2 Tethys-Dione 2Angular momentum deficit is defined as Σmi√ai(1−p1 − e2 i )(1− cos ii), and is approx- imately Σ 1 2mi√ai(e2 i + sin2 ii) for small e and i. – 15 – resonance. We have concluded in the previous section that the passage through 3:2 Tethys-Dione resonance did not happen, and here we explore the possibility that Tethys formed outside the 3:2 resonance with Dione and Dione formed interior to the 5:3 resonance with Rhea, and that Dione and Rhea have since crossed their 5:3 resonance. Figure 6 shows one simulation of the 5:3 Dione-Rhea MMR crossing. In the beginning Dione is captured in the inclination-type resonance, which eventually breaks and a chaotic phase follows, during which the eccentricities and inclinations of both bodies are excited. This part of the evolution is expected, and while it could explain the excitation of Rhea's inclination (i = 0.35◦), it is seemingly at odds with the very low inclination of Dione (i = 0.03◦). While the eccentricities are also excited, they can be expected to damp later through satellite tides. However, at 24 Myr we see a striking exchange of eccentricities and inclinations between Tethys and Dione. Both the eccentricity and inclination of Tethys get excited this way, while those of Dione are reduced. We find that this unexpected dynamical event is caused by a previously unidentified Tethys-Dione secular resonance. The secular resonance seen in these simulations has the resonant argument Ψ = 2 − 1 + Ω2 − Ω1, where and Ω are the longitudes of the pericenter and the node, and the subscripts 1 and 2 refer to Tethys and Dione, respectively. The pattern of signs in the resonant argument indicates that in this resonance the eccentricity and inclination of each moon should be correlated, and anti-correlated with those of the other moon, consistent with numerical integrations showing Tethys getting more inclined and eccentric, with Dione's orbit becoming more circular and planar. The resonance appears to break when either the eccentricity or inclination of Dione reaches zero, with the latter case being able to explaining the very low present inclination of Dione. Note that in Fig. 6 it is eccentricity, rather than inclination, that reaches zero first and breaks the secular resonance. y t i c i r t n e c c E ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Tethys 0 5 10 20 15 25 Time (Myr) 30 35 – 16 – Dione 0 5 10 20 15 25 Time (Myr) 30 35 Rhea 0 5 10 20 15 25 Time (Myr) 30 35 Fig. 6.- A simulation of Dione and Rhea encountering their mutual 5:3 resonance, followed by the Tethys-Dione secular resonance. Tidal response of Saturn was Q/k2 = 4000, while the satellites were assumed to have tidal parameters Q = 100 and k2 = 0.05. Tethys, Dione and Rhea are assumed to have low eccentricities and inclinations before the resonance crossing. At first Dione is captured in the i2 1 5:3 inclination-type resonance, but eventually resonance overlap occurs. Dione and Rhea both exit the resonance with substantial eccentricity and inclination. At about 24 Myr, Tethys and Dione enter the secular resonance, transferring eccentricity and inclination from Dione to Tethys. The type of secular resonance seen here affecting Tethys and Dione has not, to our knowledge, been described in the literature. Therefore, here we briefly discuss why it arises soon after the Dione-Rhea 5:3 mean motion resonance. The resonant argument Ψ is a combination of the arguments + Ω for each moon, which are typically very slowly varying for a regular satellite, as ≃ − Ω for low-e, low-i orbits chiefly perturbed by planetary oblateness. Usually, the leading term in + Ω is 9/4J 2 2 (a/R)4n (Murray & Dermott 1999), where J2 is the standard oblateness moment and R the radius of Saturn, and a and n are the – 17 – moon's semimajor axis and mean motion. This result does not depend on the definitions of orbital elements used (geometric vs. osculating), which affect individual expressions for Ω and but cancel out in their sum (Greenberg 1981). This term currently leads to periods of about 5000 yr and 20,000 yr for + Ω of Tethys and Dione, making Ψ < 0. Clearly, another source of precession is necessary to bring these two moons into a secular resonance. Precession due to oblateness is also affected by eccentricity and inclination. From Danby (1992), we have: + Ω = ω + 2 Ω = 3nJ2 a2(1 − e2)2(cid:16)1 − 5 4 sin2 i − cos i(cid:17) ≃ 3nJ2 a2 (cid:16)− 3 4 sin2 i + O(i4)(cid:17) (2) Where ω = − Ω is the argument of pericenter, and e and i are the moon's orbital eccentricity and inclination (to the planet's equator). For i = 1◦, we find that the quantity in parenthesis dependent on inclination is only −2 × 10−4, which for Tethys would produce retrograde precession of Ω + with a period of 11,000 yr. This is a potentially significant term, but it would add a negative term to Ψ before the resonance is encountered, as it is Dione, rather than Tethys, that must be inclined before the resonance capture occurs. Therefore this term cannot be the cause of the resonance being encountered in the first place. However, inclination-dependent terms may be important for maintaining the resonance, as they will slow down the excess apsidal precession of Tethys as it acquires inclination. Since the secular resonance is encountered near Dione's 5:3 resonance with Rhea, it appears that near-resonant terms are important for establishing the secular commensurability. With this being the second-order resonance, six different resonant terms can affect the precession of Dione. After some numerical testing, we have established that this additional precession is sensitively dependent on Dione's distance from the outermost sub-resonance (associated with the e2 2 term) and is also strongly dependent on Dione's eccentricity. These terms appear to accelerate the precession of Dione's longitude of – 18 – pericenter, but do not affect the node as much, producing a significant change in the secular resonant argument Ψ. Figure 7 shows a simulation where Dione and Rhea are placed just outside their 5:3 resonance (i.e. after an assumed 5:3 resonance passage), with Tethys having a near-circular and planar orbit and Dione having e = 0.02 and i = 0.8◦ (Rhea, not plotted, had initial e = 0.006 and i = 0.3◦). About 1.4 Myr into the simulation the secular resonance is established, and it lasts until about 8.5 Myr, when the average inclination of Dione drops below 0.1◦. While this is a somewhat artificial set-up (we assume the outcome of the 5:3 Dione-Rhea resonance, without simulating it), it clearly shows the potential of the secular resonance to produce the current orbits of Tethys and Dione, with the right initial conditions3. We find that resonance capture is almost certain (assuming Q/k2 = 4000) if the eccentricity of Dione is larger than 0.01. The current low inclination of Dione indicates that, if it was reduced by this secular resonance, the resonance had to break when the inclination of Dione reached zero (as opposed to the situation shown in Fig. 6, where eccentricity reaches zero first). As e2 = i2 in this secular resonance, and the angular momentum is conserved, this means that the initial e2 > (a1/a2)1/4(m1/m2)1/2 sin i1 = 0.012. This gives us a requirement for post-5:3 resonance orbits of Dione and Rhea: e2 > 0.012, e3 unconstrained, i2 = 0.7◦ and i3 = 0.33◦ (current value). We assume low eccentricity and inclination for Tethys at this time, as higher eccentricities of Tethys often lead to greater chaos and sometimes overlap between the Tethys-Dione 3:2 and Dione-Rhea 5:3 resonances, 3Secular resonance capture does not require a small initial inclination of Tethys (its inclination only has to be lower than the current value so it can absorb Dione's inclination), but we will assume that the initial tilt was close to zero for sake of simplicity. We have already concluded that the Tethys-Dione 3:2 resonance did not happen, and we are not aware of any other possible sources of Tethys's inclination. – 19 – y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 1.2 Tethys ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 4 Dione 8 6 Time (Myr) 10 14 0 12 2 4 8 6 Time (Myr) 10 12 14 Fig. 7.- A simulation of Tethys and Dione encountering the secular resonance. In this simulation the moons were initially placed immediately outside the Dione-Rhea 5:3 mean- motion resonance, with eccentricities and inclinations close to those required for reaching their observed inclinations through the secular resonance. – 20 – which is long-lasting, hard to break and excites inclinations beyond the observed values. While the required initial conditions for the secular resonance fall within the range of stochastic outcomes of the 5:3 Dione-Rhea resonance, we could not find a combination of initial conditions and tidal parameters that lead to such a state with high probability. We find that the initial capture into the i2 2 subresonance of the 5:3 MMR (involving only the inclination of Dione) is certain for very low initial inclinations (i2 ≃ 0.02◦). This sub-resonance, however, tends to break only at i2 = 1.4◦, which is well above the value required for the secular resonance. An initial inclination i2 = 0.1◦ leads to a jump through the the i2 2 sub-resonance and capture into the the i2i3 subresonance, in which both the inclinations of Dione and Rhea grow. This resonance usually breaks in the i2 = 0.2 − 0.7◦ range, approaching the target inclination needed for the secular resonance, while the inclination of Rhea reaches i3 = 0.1 − 0.4◦, approaching the current values. Figure 8 shows one simulation using initial i2 = 0.1◦ that results in a very low inclination of Dione and a substantial inclination of Tethys after the secular resonance. Figure 9 shows the outcome of several sets of simulations starting with i2 = 0.1◦, with all other eccentricities and inclinations (except those of Titan) being close to zero. It is clear from the figure that the amount of excitation needed to explain the present system roughly matches the outcomes of the Dione-Rhea MMR. While no single simulation exactly reproduces the current orbits, very low inclinations of Dione and significant inclinations of Tethys are often produced through the secular resonance. While the mechanism involving the 5:3 Dione-Rhea resonance followed by the Tethys-Dione secular resonance is a very promising avenue for producing the observed inclinations, we were not able to achieve this outcome with any reasonable probability using simpl. One possible explanation is that the process is so stochastic that we cannot expect to exactly reproduce the real history of the system. We think it is still too early to reach – 21 – Tethys 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 y t i c i r t n e c c E ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 0 5 10 15 20 Time (Myr) 25 30 Dione 0 5 10 15 20 Time (Myr) 25 30 Fig. 8.- A simulation of Tethys and Dione encountering the secular resonance immediately outside the Dione-Rhea 5:3 mean-motion resonance. This is one of the set #5 simulations plotted in Fig. 9 (Q/k2 = 104 for the moons and 4000 for Saturn, and Titan's eccentricity eT = 0.04). Due to its non-zero initial inclination Dione jumps through the i2 2 resonance but is then captured in the next sub-resonance, which breaks at i2 = 0.04. in this simulation we see temporary capture into a three-body sub-resonance of the Dione-Rhea 5:3 MMR that also involves Tethys, with the argument 5λ3 − 3λ2 − 2 − 1. By increasing the eccentricities of Tethys and Dione, such subresonance captures typically make the secular resonance capture more likely. – 22 – 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 Dione's Eccentricity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Rhea's Inclination (°) ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n ' I s e n o D i Fig. 9.- Outcome of a number of numerical experiments of the Dione-Rhea 5:3 mean motion resonance crossing, also including Tethys and Titan. The values plotted here are representative of the time just after the mean-motion resonance and before the Tethys- Dione secular resonance (where applicable). We ran five sets of eight simulations using initial i2 = 0.1 for Dione and different tidal parameters, and final eccentricities and inclinations were plotted here for cases where the mean-motion resonance was crossed in less than 50 Myr (or 70 Myr for Set #2). Sets #1 (crosses), #2 (Xs) and #5 (circles) had Q/k2 = 104 for the moons, while sets #3 (asterisks) and #4 (squares) had Q/k2 = 200 for all three icy satellites. Set #2 (Xs) had Q/k2 = 8000 for Saturn, while all other sets had Q/k2 = 4000 for the planet. The first three sets had e4 = 0.007 for Titan, while sets #4 and #5 had more realistic initial eT = 0.04. Secular resonance typically follows if e2 > 0.01, and produces very low inclinations for Dione if the initial e2 > sin i2 (i.e. for initial conditions below the dashed line). The thick black line and the solid square plot the initial conditions for the secular resonance that are consistent with the moons' present inclinations. – 23 – such a conclusion, and hope to explore this question in future work. The major limitations of our present approach include: 1) we assume that the tidal properties of the satellites are constant over time, despite varying eccentricities and tidal heating; 2) we assume Saturn's tidal Q is frequency-independent, which has implications for the exact timing of recent resonance crossings; 3) while our integrator allows it, we did not explore different initial tidal parameters for the three moons (i.e. we assumed they were all equally rigid or dissipative, which is likely to be wrong). A clear step forward would be incorporation of a geophysical model into the integrator that would adjust tidal parameters depending on the tidal heating and other processes the moon is subject to. The chief conclusion of this section is that the past 5:3 mean-motion resonance between Dione and Rhea likely did happen, unlike the 3:2 Tethys-Dione resonance discussed in the previous section. This gives us a very well-defined relative age of Tethys, Dione and Rhea, which is related to their absolute age through the controversial tidal Q of Saturn. As for the absolute ages, the classical Q = 18, 000 (Meyer & Wisdom 2007) and the "fast" Q = 1700 (Lainey et al. 2012) would place the formation of Tethys, Dione and Rhea at about 1.1 Gyr and 100 Myr ago, respectively, with both dates being much younger than the age of the Solar System. In the following sections, we will briefly explore the possible dynamical mechanisms that could have led to the late formation of the present set of mid-sized icy moons of Saturn. 5. Evolution of the Protosatellite Disk As we are proposing that the moons of Saturn (out to Rhea) formed much later than the planet, we need to address the plausibility and basic physics of such an event. First of all, the flatness of Saturn's regular satellite system indicates formation from a thin disk. Since we think that Tethys, Dione and Rhea all formed close to their present orbits, this – 24 – disk would need to extend out to about 10 Saturn radii and comprise the combined mass of the mid-sized moons. Since the Titan-Hyperion resonance appears very old (Greenberg 1973a; ´Cuk et al. 2013), we assume that Titan (and other more distant moons) predated this protosatelite disk that Tethys, Dione and Rhea formed from. This does not necessarily mean Titan must be primordial, as it may have originated during another, more ancient satellite instability event (Hamilton 2013), which is outside the focus of this paper. As Saturn has youthful and dynamic rings surrounded by numerous small moons (Cuzzi et al. 2010), we propose that the rings also formed in the same event as Tethys, Dione and Rhea. This means that the protosatellite disk discussed here extended all the way inward to the Roche limit (possibly due to viscous spreading). Unlike a primordial circumplanetary disk, this disk would be comprised exclusively of solids, save for short-lived vapor created in collisions. In this Section we discuss the likely lifetime and fate of this disk, while in Sections 7 and 8 we will address the origin of the disk. Burns & Gladman (1998) used numerical simulations to study the fate of ejecta in the Saturnian system in order to constrain possible hazards for the Cassini spacecraft. They found that the moons accrete any material initially found on crossing orbits in mere centuries (also see Alvarellos et al. 2005), and theoretical predictions of their growth rate from debris are also on the order of millennia (cf. Goldreich et al. 2004; Chiang & Laughlin 2013). We can use the expression in Chiang & Laughlin (2013) (also see Goldreich et al. 2004) to calculate the coagulation time: 1 ρcoreRcore Fgrav σsolidΩ t ≃ (3) where ρ and σ are the volume and surface densities of a solid core and the disk, respectively, and Fgrav is the gravitational focusing factor (we will assume Fgrav = 1). If we estimate σsolid = 4 × 1021 kg π−1(6 × 108 m)−2 ≃ 4000 kg m−2, ρcore = 1200 kg m−3 and – 25 – Ω = 2 × 10−5s−1 (corresponding to a 4-day orbital period), we get t ≃ 0.5 yr km−1Rcore (4) Therefore, it would take less than 1000 years to grow 1000 km satellites, in agreement with the numerical integrations of debris removal by Burns & Gladman (1998). However there are serious problems with this approach. The first is that the present satellites have well-separated Hill spheres and would therefore not sweep up all of the material between them. Assuming a uniform disk, we can estimate the number (n) and size (r) of the satellites assuming that they are separated by 5 Hill radii: r = 5nRhill = 5nr(cid:16) M 3Mpl (cid:17)1/3 = 5nr(cid:16) Mdisk 3nMpl (cid:17)1/3 so therefore n = 5−3/2(cid:16) 3Mpl Mdisk (cid:17)1/2 ≃ 60, (5) (6) where we have assumed Mdisk ≃ MRhea + MDione + MT ethys. This makes the mass of a typical protosatellite M = Mdisk/n = 0.7 × 1020 kg, comparable to that of Enceladus. These protosatellites would take significantly longer to merge into the larger moons we observe today. The mechanism for their destabilization and mergings would likely be chaotic interaction between the moons, many of which would likely be in overlapping mean-motion resonances with several others. Additionally, there would be some fragmentation during their accretion and mergings, and rings of debris would likely occupy quasi-stable areas between neighboring moons' cleared zones. Interaction with this debris would also affect the protosatellites' orbits, leading to orbit crossings and mergers. Direct numerical modeling is clearly needed to explore the evolution of such a system. Another caveat with accretion is outside perturbations, mainly from Titan. As Burns & Gladman (1998) show, the orbits close to Titan's 3:1 and 2:1 resonances are significantly more perturbed than those in between mid-sized moons. This excitation would – 26 – inhibit accretion, at least in some locations, potentially leading to a relatively long-lived debris ring outside the orbit of Rhea. Eventually this disk would spread and disperse due to inter-particle scatterings and collisions. Crida & Charnoz (2012) find that the timescale for the lifetime of planetary rings, based on numerical experiments, can be expressed as: Tdisk = (cid:16) π 52(RH/Rpart)5(cid:17) M 2 pl diskr4 σ2 disk Torbit (7) where Rpart and RH are a particle's physical and Hill radius, respectively. Assuming the disk radius of r = 6 × 108 m (ten Saturn radii) and a density of 500 kg m−3 for disk particles, (RH/Rpart) ≃ 6 and Torbit=5 days, Tdisk = 3 × 1011yr 1 σ2 disk[ kg m−2]2 (8) If we assume a surface density σdisk = 4000 kg m−2, the spreading time according to the above formula is about 2000 yr. After the surface density decreases by a factor of a few, the disk can last tens of kyr. At that point it would still contain a mass on the order of M = 1021 kg, making it possible to force protosatellites (or satellite fragments) of comparable mass to migrate as the disk is spreading. While the material on the inner edge would likely be accreted by Rhea, the large gap between the inner system and Titan would leave space for any protosatellites (or fragments of disrupted satellites) to migrate and potentially interact with Titan through mean-motion resonances. 6. Excitation of Titan's Eccentricity The outer part of the disk, outside the 3:1 resonance with Titan (and particularly around the 2:1 resonance at 12.7 Saturn radii), would experience strong forced eccentricity due to Titan, and may endure as a debris disk for a much longer time (Burns & Gladman 1998). A satellitesimal (or a fragment) that is ejected outwards may be able to migrate by interacting with the spreading disk, and become trapped in a mean motion resonance with – 27 – Titan. The migration of such an object due to disk spreading could be much faster than that due to tidal migration and could excite Titan's eccentricity to the observed value in a relatively short amount of time. In the simulation shown in Figure 10, we introduced an artificial fast migration of a 4 × 1020 kg moon (0.3% of Titan's mass) starting around 13 Saturn radii, just outside Titan's 2:1 resonance. Our hypothesis is that there would be a spreading ring of excited, non-accreting debris around the location of the resonance. The initial eccentricity of the moon was set to e = 0.1, as we would expect this moon's (or fragment's) orbit to be excited. The moon in question migrates out until it is caught in the 5:3 resonance with Titan. In the first 1000 years after resonance capture, it is the eccentricity of the inner moon that grows, indicating a Lindblad resonance (involving the smaller body's eccentricity). However, very soon the system settles into a "co-rotation"-type resonance (involving the larger body's eccentricity) and stays in it for the rest of the simulation. This behavior is unexpected and is likely related to the relatively rapid rate of evolution, which stabilizes formally overlapping sub-resonances. In 50,000 years, the eccentricity of Titan grows to about 0.05, well above its observed value. Eventually, the resonance would break as the eccentricities of both bodies become high (the inner moon is indirectly affected by Titan's eccentricity), or the migration slows down and long-term chaos takes over. Figure 11 shows a similar simulation involving a twice larger inner moon (M = 8 × 1020 kg), and a similar capture into the 8:5 resonance with Titan. After the resonance breaks, the inner moon collides with either Titan or the disk. Re-absorption of the protosatellite into the disk would have no consequences for Titan or Hyperion. However, close encounters followed by a collision with Titan would perturb the orbits of both Titan and Hyperion. If the Titan-Hyperion resonance is several Gyr old (Greenberg 1973a; ´Cuk et al. 2013), its continued existence might be in conflict with – 28 – A B ) H R ( e c n a t s D i y t i c i r t n e c c E 14.6 14.4 14.2 14 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 10 20 30 Time, kyr 40 50 Fig. 10.- Excitation of Titan's eccentricity through a 3:5 resonance with a rapidly migrating moon of mass m = 4×1020 kg. Gray lines plot the orbital elements for the inner moon, while the black lines plot the elements of Titan. In panel A, the gray line shows the semimajor axis of the inner moon, while the black line plots the location of the 5:3 resonance with Titan. – 29 – A B 15 14.5 14 13.5 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 ) H R ( e c n a t s D i y t i c i r t n e c c E 0 0 2 4 8 6 Time, kyr 10 12 14 Fig. 11.- Excitation of Titan's eccentricity through a 5:8 resonance with a rapidly migrating moon of mass m = 8×1020 kg. Gray lines plot the orbital elements for the inner moon, while the black lines plot the elements of Titan. In panel A, the gray line shows the semimajor axis of the inner moon, while the black line plots the location of the 8:5 resonance with Titan. – 30 – 120 100 80 60 40 20 ) ° ( e d u t i l p m a e c n a n o s e R 0 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 Eccentricity of Titan Fig. 12.- Maximum libration amplitudes of the Titan-Hyperion resonance argument 4λH − 3λT − H at the end of 76 10,000-year simulations of Titan and Hyperion following collisions between a scattered 9× 1020 kg satellite and Titan (see text). The maximum amplitude was calculated as the largest excursion from the libration center at 180◦ over 10,000 years (the observed value is 59◦; indicated by the dotted line). – 31 – any destructive events in recent history. We therefore used complex to run a set of 100 simulations of scatterings between Titan, Hyperion and a 9 × 1020 kg satellite. The "rogue" satellite was initially placed on an eccentric orbit with a = 13.2RS and e = 0.53, with each run having a different longitude of pericenter or a different initial longitude for the inner satellite. Titan and Hyperion were initially placed deep in the resonance, with Titan on a circular orbit and Hyperion having e = 0.1. In 85 out of one hundred 1000-year simulations using complex, Titan and the inner moon collided, and in 76 of these Titan and Hyperion maintained a stable 4:3 resonance. The stability of the resonance was determined by integrating post-merger Titan and Hyperion for 10,000 years using simpl. The average orbits of Titan and Hyperion in the post-merger simpl simulations are shown in Fig. 12. The eccentricity of Titan is excited to about 0.01-0.02 on average (about half of its present value), requiring a different excitation mechanism (such as the mean-motion resonance described in this section) to explain its present orbit. The main (resonant) component of Hyperion's eccentricity stays close to 0.1, with the other ("slow") component being proportional to Titan's eccentricity. The resonant argument is excited, and the present libration semi-amplitude of 59◦ is firmly within the ensemble of outcomes. We conclude that a resonant interaction with a moon as small as 4 × 1020 kg, migrating due to disk spreading, can excite Titan's eccentricity to the current value. Even if this moon subsequently impacts Titan, the Titan-Hyperion mean-motion resonance is likely to survive this event. We numerically confirm resonance survival for a "rogue moon" mass of 9 × 1020 kg, and it is certain that collisions with smaller moons would have an even less disruptive effect on the Titan-Hyperion resonance. An eccentricity excitation only about 100 Myr ago would explain the surprisingly large free eccentricity of Titan despite its likely dissipative surface and interior (Sagan & Dermott 1982; Sohl et al. 1995). – 32 – 7. Resonances in an Ancient Satellite System In the previous sections we find that Saturn's present-day moons interior to Titan's orbit likely accreted much after the planet's formation, presumably from a disk, which covered the locations of the moons from Mimas to Rhea. As we discussed in Section 5, this disk would last only millennia, possibly somewhat longer in locations where Titan's perturbations inhibit accretion. Therefore we think that the disk was a temporary feature, and we propose that it originated in the destruction of a previous satellite system. While we argue that Saturn's present mid-sized satellite system is relatively young, its expected lifetime is measured in Gyr, 4 even in the case of "fast tides" proposed by Lainey et al. (2012). Therefore, we argue that the most long-term arrangement of the mass currently in the mid-sized moons of Saturn is a system of satellites. As this previous system of satellites would have had the extent and total mass of the present mid-sized icy moon system, we will assume it also had most of its mass in the outermost two satellites, like Dione and Rhea today (this architecture is also most stable against tidal evolution). Is there a way of destabilizing a mid-sized satellite system? We expect that any perturbations that can lead to large orbital eccentricities and moon-moon collisions would have to be resonant in nature. In this and the following sections, we will discuss several candidate resonances for destabilization of the putative previous-generation satellite system of Saturn. Assuming Q ≃ 1700 for Saturn, a Rhea-sized moon would evolve to about the present location of Rhea over 4.5 Gyr, while a somewhat smaller moon (like Tethys or Dione) would converge on positions very close to, but interior to, Rhea's present orbit. This arrangement, with a Rhea-sized moon close to Rhea's present orbit, and a "proto-Dione" on a converging interior orbit, is the starting point for our studies of past dynamical instability. 4Using Q = 1700 for Saturn, the next major resonance (Tethys-Dione 4:3 MMR) will not happen for at least 2 Gyr. – 33 – The simplest case would be a mean-motion resonance like that of Tethys and Dione described in Section 3. However, the relatively small masses of the inner moons make it impossible to excite their eccentricities to the high values required for orbit crossing (at least e = 0.1 − 0.2). Tidal evolution while the moons are captured in a mean-motion resonance can in principle lead to monotonic eccentricity growth, but tidal dissipation within the moons can easily limit eccentricity growth for realistic physical parameters. A chaotic resonance between a large and a much smaller moon could excite the smaller moon's eccentricity enough to cause a collision, such a mismatched collision is unlikely to lead to disruption of a Dione or Rhea-sized moon (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012). Resonances between a mid-sized satellite and Titan have the potential of being more powerful, but are also unlikely to have been the cause of a past instability. We find that the 4:1 resonance with (non-eccentric) Titan at about 8 Saturn radii leads to temporary capture, after which the inner moon acquires an eccentricity of e ≤ 0.01 and i = 0.3◦. Another major resonance close to the mid-sized moons is the 3:1 with Titan, at 10 Saturn radii. This resonance is strongly chaotic, making the inner moon significantly eccentric and plausibly leading to instability. However, this resonance overlaps with the 4:1 resonance with Hyperion (which is in the 3:4 resonance with Titan). As Hyperion is small and does not damp eccentricity, a Rhea-sized moon in the 3:1 resonance with Titan quickly destabilizes Hyperion. Due to the survival of Hyperion we can exclude the 3:1 resonance with Titan as the source of a past instability. Another set of resonances in the region inhabited by the mid-sized satellites is the so-called evection-type resonances. These are commensurabilities between a satellite's apsidal precession and the Sun's (or another distant perturber's) apparent planetocentric orbital period. Given Saturn's oblateness and heliocentric orbit, the strongest of these resonances happen for moons at about 8.3 Saturn radii, which have an apsidal precession – 34 – period equal to Saturn's 29.5 year orbital period. Additional harmonics with evection happen at 6.9 Saturn radii (precession is 1/2 of Saturn's year) and 7.3 Saturn radii (precession equals 2/3 of Saturn's year). Figure 13 shows a moon encountering the main evection resonance assuming its tidal response stays limited (M = 16 × 1020 kg, Q = 100, k2 = 0.05 for the satellite). The eccentricity of the moon is strongly excited, and so is the inclination. However, since this resonance affects only the eccentricity but not the mean motion of the satellite, and the satellite tides are too weak to reverse the evolution (as we assumed k2 = 0.05), the satellite eventually passes the resonance without being destabilized (as long as it has no very close neighbors). After crossing the resonance, both eccentricity and inclination are high. While eccentricity can damp, inclination will not, implying that any moon that passed through the evection resonance should have an inclination of several degrees. This is well in excess of the current inclination of Rhea (the only moon beyond the evection resonance), implying that an intact Rhea with these tidal properties could not have formed close to the rings and migrated out to its present location, as suggested by Charnoz et al. (2011). If we assume large-scale melting within the moon whose orbit is excited by the evection resonance, its orbital behavior changes. As shown in Fig 14 (where we assumed a much larger k2 = 0.5 for the moon), the evection resonance excites a large eccentricity, which then damps and in the process makes the moon migrate inward. After the eccentricity is damped, the outward migration continues and the cycle repeats. Each next "bounce" from the resonance will not be identical, as the inclination also evolves. We see no reason why this process cannot continue for 1 Gyr or more, trapping the satellite close to the original location of the evection resonance. The difference between the scenarios shown in Figs. 13 and 14 depends only on the internal properties of the satellite. Regardless of the outcome (resonance crossing or ) H R i j ( s x a r o a m m e S i A 8.245 8.24 8.235 8.23 8.225 0.12 B – 35 – y t i c i r t n e c c E 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 C 0 20 40 60 Time, Myr 80 100 Fig. 13.- Passage of a moon through the evection resonance with the Sun. We assumed M = 16 × 1020 kg, Q = 100, k2 = 0.05 for the satellite. – 36 – A B C 0 50 100 150 200 Time, Myr 8.235 8.23 8.225 8.22 8.215 8.21 8.205 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 ) H R i j ( s x a r o a m m e S i y t i c i r t n e c c E ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I Fig. 14.- Long-lasting slowdown of tidal evolution of an M = 16 × 1020 kg moon due to the evection resonance with the Sun. We assumed Q = 100, k2 = 0.5 for the satellite, which stay constant through the simulation. Unlike in Fig. 13, eccentricity-damping satellite tides are strong enough to prevent the passage through the evection resonance. – 37 – long-term stalling of outward tidal evolution), the evection resonance has a potential of exciting satellite orbits to eccentricities of e = 0.1 or more in very short amounts of time. Before considering the effect of evection on two interacting satellites, we will briefly address some higher-order harmonics of evection. The evection resonance in the Saturnian system is notably chaotic and tends to affect both eccentricity and inclination. This is in contrast to the evection resonance in the early Earth-Moon system, where it affects only eccentricity, and can lead to stable capture (Touma & Wisdom 1998; ´Cuk & Stewart 2012) or a stable near-resonant equilibrium (Wisdom & Tian 2015). We find that this complex behavior is caused by the evection resonance's overlap with its nearby harmonics, which affect inclination. The principal inclination harmonic has the resonant argument λSun − Sun + Ω2 − ΩSun, where Ω2 is the moon's longitude of ascending node, while ΩSun is the node of the Sun's apparent orbit measured relative to the moons' Laplace plane (in practice, this angle is equivalent to the equinox of Saturn). This harmonic can be seen as a combination of the annual equation and the principal secular perturbation in inclination (Brouwer & Clemence 1961). This argument's strength varies with Saturn's eccentricity and therefore it cannot lead to stable long-term capture, but it can induce significant variation of inclination, as seen in Figs. 13 and 14. In Fig. 14, the inclination is stable after about 100 Myr, indicating that the moon may be in a state where it is affected only by the principal evection resonance. The strongest among the 2:1 evection harmonics at 6.9 Saturn radii involves not only the perturbed satellite and the Sun, but also Titan. This is due to its resonant argument 2λSun − − T , where designates longitude of pericenter and λ the mean longitude. This argument combines the basic evection term 2λSun − 2 with the moon-Titan secular term − T (for a summary of different perturbation terms see Brouwer & Clemence 1961). We find that mid-sized icy moons can get captured in this resonance, and that their – 38 – further evolution through the resonance increases the eccentricity of Titan. This resonance may seem like an attractive way of generating Titan's eccentricity ( ´Cuk et al. 2013), but the resonance always breaks due to satellite tides when the smaller moon's eccentricity reaches a few percent. The increase in Titan's eccentricity is always a factor of a few too small to explain the observed value, and this resonance never seems to lead to instability. The strongest 3:2 evection harmonic at 7.3 Saturn radii has the resonant argument 3λSun − 2 − Sun. This argument can be viewed as a combination of the evection and the annual equation λSun − Sun (Brouwer & Clemence 1961). As its argument includes Sun, the 3:2 evection harmonic term's strength is proportional to Saturn's heliocentric eccentricity, which varies by an order of magnitude (0.01-0.09) during a 50,000 year secular cycle (Murray & Dermott 1999). This means that the resonance is weak during a low point in Saturn's eccentricity, and our simulations show that a capture into this resonance breaks relatively fast, with the moon moving past the resonance with an eccentricity of a few percent and an inclination of a degree or two. We find that this is an unlikely candidate for instability. 8. Evection Resonance Acting on a Pair of Moons In order to produce a disk, we need a collision between two large moons, probably somewhat similar to Dione and Rhea. As the evection resonance is the most promising source of excitation, we envisage a scenario in which the outer moon is in or near the evection resonance distance, while the inner moon is somewhat closer to Saturn. This configuration can arise either by moons migrating together in a mean-motion resonance, or by the inner moon catching up to the outer one. In general, similar-sized moons would tend to converge on close orbits due to tides, and the real Dione and Rhea (mass ratio 1:2.4) are evolving toward a configuration more compact than their 4:3 mutual resonance. Another – 39 – possibility is that the outer moon is caught in a cycle of evection resonance "bounces" (Fig. 14), while the inner moon is catching up. In Fig. 15 we show an integration (using simpl) of convergent migration of a "proto-Dione" (with a combined mass of Dione and Tethys) and "proto-Rhea" (with the mass of Rhea) into their mutual 4:3 resonance. Once the outer moon enters the evection resonance, the satellites become dynamically coupled to Saturn's heliocentric orbit and their eccentricities are ultimately excited to large values (e=0.1-0.2), leading to orbit-crossing and a collision. In this simulation, the 4:3 mean-motion resonance capture happens first, and only then do the moons enter the evection resonance. While the moons are in the 4:3 mean-motion resonance, they are also in the secular resonance 2 − 1 (i.e. apsidal anti-alignment; Fig. 16). Due to the stabilizing effects of the secular resonance the moons are capable of simultaneously being in stable e1 and e2 sub-resonances of the 4:3 resonance, without the chaos usually accompanying resonance overlap (i.e. the arguments 4λ2 − 3λ1 − 1 and 4λ2 − 3λ1 − 2 are both librating). This configuration is apparently stable until the outer satellite reaches the evection resonance. The next stage of their evolution, starting at about 24 Myr, is chaotic and during this time the moons are not in either 4:3 or (apsidal) secular resonance. Chaos is driven by both the evection resonance proper and its associated harmonics. While the main evection resonance 2λSun − 22 and its inclination-related harmonic λSun − Sun + Ω2 − ΩSun affect the outer satellite, the 2:1 evection harmonic λSun − 2 − T affects the inner satellite (Ω is the longitude of the node, and the subscript T refers to Titan). Fig. 17 shows the 10 kyr interval 26 Myr into the simulation, during which both the main evection argument and its 2:1 harmonic reverse the direction of circulation, and this behavior is correlated with the eccentricities of the moons (which continually exchange angular momentum). The presence A 8.33 8.32 8.31 8.3 8.29 8.28 8.27 8.26 0.12 B 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 ) H R ( e c n a t s D i y t i c i r t n e c c E C ) ° ( n o i t a n i l c n I 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 – 40 – 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time, Myr Fig. 15.- A simulation of two moons resembling Dione and Rhea being destabilized through the evection resonance. Panel A shows the outer moon's semimajor axis (black) and the location of the 4:3 resonance with the inner moon (gray). Panels B and C show the moons' eccentricities and inclinations, with the inner and outer moon plotted using gray and black lines, respectively. At first the moons are captured in the 4:3 mean-motion resonance (around 10 Myr into the simulation), which is temporarily stable. About 24 Myr into the simulation the outer moon enters the evection resonance, which excites the orbits of both moons. This excitation leads to orbit crossing and a collision at about 28 Myr. – 41 – A B C 0 5 15 10 Time (Myr) 20 25 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 ) ° ( t n e m u g r a 3 : 4 ) ° ( t n e m u g r a l r a u c e S y t i c i r t n e c c E Fig. 16.- The same simulation as shown in Figure 15. Panel A plots the 4:3 resonant argument 4λ2 − 3λ1 − 1, Panel B shows the secular resonant argument 2 − 1, and Panel C shows the correlated eccentricities of the inner (gray) and outer (black) satellites. λ and designate the mean longitude and the longitude of the pericenter, while subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the inner and the outer satellite, respectively. ) ° ( t n e m u g r a n o i t c e v E ) ° ( t n e m u g r a 1 : 2 y t i c i r t n e c c E – 42 – A B C 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (kyr), starting at 26 Myr 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Fig. 17.- The same simulation as shown in Figure 15, but here we show only 10 kyr of the simulation, starting at 26 Myr. Panel A plots the evection resonance argument 2λSun − 22, Panel B shows the argument of the 2:1 evection harmonic 2λSun − 2 − 3, and Panel C shows the eccentricities of the inner (gray) and outer (black) satellite. λ and designate the mean longitude and the longitude of the pericenter, while subscripts 1, 2 and 3 refer to the inner moon, outer moon, and Titan, respectively. ) ° ( t n e m u g r a n o i t c e v E ) ° ( t n e m u g r a 1 : 2 y t i c i r t n e c c E – 43 – A B C 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time (kyr), starting at 26.5 Myr 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 -200 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Fig. 18.- Same simulation as shown in Figure 15, but here we show only 100 kyr of the simulation, starting at 26.5 Myr. Panel A plots the evection resonance argument 2λSun−22, Panel B shows the argument of the 2:1 evection harmonic 2λSun − 2 − 3, and Panel C shows the eccentricities of the inner (gray) and outer (black) satellite (symbols mean the same as in Fig. 17). The eccentricity boost to the outer moon just before 80 kyr is caused by the evection resonance, while subsequent large kicks are due to close encounters. – 44 – of the 2:1 evection harmonic at the location of the inner moon is a simple consequence that two moons around an oblate body have an apsidal precession period ratio of about two when they are close to the 4:3 resonance. Since ∝ a−7/2, 1 2 = (cid:16)a2 a1(cid:17)3.5 = (cid:16)h 4 3i2/3(cid:17)7/2 = 1.96; (9) therefore, if the outer moon's pericenter precesses at a rate close to Saturn's mean motion, the inner moon would naturally precess at about twice that rate (barring other complications), exposing itself to perturbations arising from 2:1 near-resonance with the heliocentric motion. The importance of the 2:1 harmonic depends on the eccentricity of Titan, which was 4 × 10−3 in this simulation (i.e. one order of magnitude lower than observed). If Titan efficiently damped any eccentricity it might have had before the last re-arrangement of the system, this resonance may have been much less prominent. In general, we find that the main evection resonance is the most important one for the eventual fate of the system. The two moons, while having large and rapidly varying eccentricities and inclinations, remain stable for several Myr. Eventually the pair enter a state in which the 2:1 harmonic is less important and the evection resonance dominates. Just before instability, the outer moon gets a major eccentricity boost from the evection resonance (Fig. 18). Soon after that close encounters begin and the two orbits are irreversibly coupled. At about 26.6 Myr, as the orbits become crossing, we pass the simulation from simpl to complex. We find that the collision typically occurs in about 1000 years. This collision, at about 3 km/s, is just energetic enough to be erosive and can lead to the formation of a disk (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012). We also achieved instability in a simulation where the moons are initially not in 4:3 resonance, but on orbits converging due to tidal evolution (this time the masses are M1 = 11 × 1020 kg, M2 = 16 × 1020 kg). In this simulation we placed the outer moon just – 45 – interior to the evection resonance, so dramatic effects happen soon. However, given that a moon could be trapped at this distance by the evection resonance for a long time (Fig. 14), it is fully plausible to have the inner moon converge on the outer moon while the latter is trapped by the evection resonance. While the collision resulting from the simulation shown in Fig. 15 is marginally energetic enough to disrupt the moons (Leinhardt & Stewart 2012), in reality the moons' inclinations may be higher by the time destabilization occurs. A previous residence in either the evection or 4:3 resonance, as well as crossing of any of the other evection harmonics or any other mean motion resonances (with one another or with other satellites) would lead to inclinations of several degrees before the beginning of the last resonance, increasing the likely collision velocity. 9. Conclusions We used direct numerical simulations to explore a past hypothetical 3:2 mean-motion resonance crossing between Saturn's moons Tethys and Dione, as well as a 5:3 resonance crossing between Dione and Rhea. As the current Tethys/Dione and Dione/Rhea orbital period ratios are just above 2/3 and 3/5 respectively, and tidal recession from Saturn is expected to be fastest for Tethys and slowest for Rhea, these resonances have generally been thought to have been crossed at some point in the past. We find that the 3:2 resonance crossing always leads to excessive excitation of the orbital inclinations of both Tethys and Dione, which is inconsistent with their current orbits. Using the same approach, we conclude that the 5:3 resonance between Dione and Rhea, which closely follows the Tethys-Dione 3:2 resonance in the timeline of tidal evolution, most likely did happen. We find that the 5:3 Dione-Rhea resonance, immediately followed by a previously unknown Tethys-Dione secular resonance, is the most likely source of the current inclinations of Tethys and Rhea. – 46 – We can therefore state that Tethys and Dione evolved tidally by only a modest amount over their lifetimes, which is only about a quarter of the tidal evolution envisaged in Murray & Dermott (1999). There are two possible interpretations: either tidal evolution of Saturn's moons has been very slow, or Saturn's mid-sized moons are significantly younger than the Solar System. While both interpretations are consistent with the lack of the past Tethys-Dione resonance, we favor the idea that the moons are young, possibly as young as 100 Myr. Young moons would be consistent with the astrometric analysis of Lainey et al. (2012, 2015), equilibrium tidal heating of Enceladus (Porco et al. 2006; Howett et al. 2011; Meyer & Wisdom 2007) and the evolved state of the Titan-Hyperion resonance (Greenberg 1973a; ´Cuk et al. 2013). Therefore, we propose that Tethys, Dione and Rhea all formed in one large event about 100 Myr ago. The Trojan moons of Tethys and Dione that share their inclinations must have formed even more recently, after their passage through the secular resonance. Mimas, Enceladus and the rings could have formed at the same epoch as Tethys, Dione and Rhea, or could be younger yet. Tidal evolution of Mimas and Enceladus, and their current resonances with Tethys and Dione are a complex subject (Meyer & Wisdom 2008, and references therein), and will be addressed in future work. Our results require most craters on Rhea and the moons interior to its orbit to be produced by planetocentric impactors. Many authors have considered the cratering record of Saturn's mid-sized moons to result from both heliocentric and planetocentric impactors, with the latter being especially important on Mimas and Enceladus (Dones et al. 2009; Kirchoff & Schenk 2010). Differences in crater size-frequency distributions (SFDs) between moons do not contradict our scenario, as each moon would be primarily cratered by debris on nearby orbits. Bierhaus et al. (2012, 2015) have shown that differences in surface gravity and impact velocity can produce a wide range of crater SFDs for the moons orbiting a planet. Impact speeds for planetocentric impactors onto the moons will be roughly an order of magnitude smaller than for comets from heliocentric orbit, – 47 – so larger planetocentric impactors are needed to make a given crater. However, the required impactor sizes remain plausible, as they are still smaller than the crater sizes, even for basins in the Saturn system. For instance, using Keith Holsapple's tool at http://keith.aa.washington.edu/craterdata/scaling/index.htm, we estimate that a planetocentric impactor with a diameter of 40 km impacting Mimas at 3 km/s could procuce the Herschel basin, which has a diameter of 130 km. Planetocentric impactors are also fully compatible with more than one cratering episode: the relative youth of Trojan companions and their apparent origin as debris from the larger moons imply at least one intense cratering episode following the resonance crossings described in this paper. The absence of a past 3:2 resonance between Tethys and Dione also rules out the simplest version of the scenario proposed by Charnoz et al. (2011) and Crida & Charnoz (2012), in which the moons formed sequentially out of past massive rings, and then migrated outward. That hypothesis implies that Tethys had to "catch up" with Dione, invariably crossing the 3:2 resonance. Our results do not exclude the possibility that the previous generation of moons did form this way, but were destroyed and re-accreted close to their present positions. Other ultimate origins of the mid-sized satellite system, such as those proposed by Canup (2010) and Asphaug & Reufer (2013), or a late origin of Titan (Hamilton 2013), can certainly be reconciled with a recent episode of re-accretion. Disruptions, followed by formation of a debris disk and re-accretion, erase much of the diagnostic information about the moons' formation, and put few constraints on the ultimate origin of the system. Using order-of-magnitude arguments, we conclude that the disk that gave rise to the present mid-sized moons can only be short-lived and must be a product of disruption of a previous generation of mid-sized moons. We explored different configurations of Saturn's past satellite system in order to find a likely source of such an instability. The most likely – 48 – trigger for a global instability is the evection (semi-secular) resonance between the largest past moon (assumed to be Rhea-sized) and the Sun, located just interior to the present orbit of Rhea. If most of the current icy moons' mass was concentrated in two moons on converging orbits (somewhat similar to Dione and Rhea), with the outer one evolving into the evection resonance, we find that a large scale instability and mutual collisions are a common outcome. We also propose disk-driven migration of small moons (at the edge of the resulting disk) into orbital resonances with Titan as a plausible source of Titan's eccentricity. There are three possible avenues toward testing the hypothesis of the young Saturnian mid-sized satellite system. While preliminary results appear to support fast migration (Lainey et al. 2015), further work on the satellite astrometry using Cassini data should be able to decisively confirm or falsify the findings of Lainey et al. (2012). Second, better understanding of the geophysics of Enceladus may be able to clarify if its energy source is indeed tidal and if the dynamical equilibrium hypothesis is appropriate. Third, this hypothesis requires that the majority of craters on Saturn's moons interior to Titan (many of which have heavily cratered surfaces) must be the product of planetocentric impacts, as there would not have been enough time for them to accumulate sufficient numbers of cometary impacts (Dones et al. 2009). We hope that further work on crater and impactor population modeling will be able to put stronger constraints on impactor sources. M. ´C. acknowledges support from NASA's Outer Planets Research Program, awards NNX11AM48G and NNX14AOO38G. We thank an anonymous reviewer for very insightful comments that greatly improved the paper. – 49 – Table 1: Masses and mean orbital parameters of Saturn's major moons and their Trojan com- panions (semimajor axes of Trojans are marked by superscript "t"). All quantities were re- trieved from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Solar System Dynamics website ssd.jpl.nasa.gov on 04/13/15. Semimajor axes are scaled using Saturn's equatorial radius of 60,268 km, and inclinations are measured relative to the relevant Laplace planes. Masses of the Trojan moons (in italics) are estimates based on an assumed density of 500 kg m−3. Eccentrici- ties and inclinations shown here are "free", and do not include the forced components (see Murray & Dermott 1999). In the cases of Enceladus and Hyperion, typical instantaneous eccentricities (e = 0.005 for Enceladus and e = 0.1 for Hyperion) are well in the excess of the free component, so the eccentricity shown is starred. Moon Mass Semimajor Eccentricity Inclination (1020 kg) axis (RS) Mimas Enceladus Tethys Calypso Telesto Dione Helene Polydeuces Rhea Titan Hyperion Iapetus 0.375 1.08 6.176 2 .5 × 10 −5 4 .0 × 10 −5 10.96 1 .1 × 10 −4 4 .5 × 10 −8 23.07 1345 0.059 18.06 3.079 3.950 4.889 4.890t 4.890t 6.262 6.262t 6.259t 8.745 20.27 24.90 59.08 0.0196 0.0000∗ 0.0001 0.0005 0.0002 0.0022 0.0000 0.0191 0.0002 0.0288 0.0232∗ 0.0293 (◦) 1.574 0.003 1.091 1.500 1.180 0.028 0.213 0.175 0.333 0.306 0.615 8.298 – 50 – REFERENCES Allan, R. R. 1969, AJ, 74, 497 Alvarellos, J. L., Zahnle, K. J., Dobrovolskis, A. R., & Hamill, P. 2005, Icarus, 178, 104 Asphaug, E., Agnor, C. B., & Williams, Q. 2006, Nature, 439, 155 Asphaug, E., & Reufer, A. 2013, Icarus, 223, 544 Bierhaus, E. B., Dones, L., Alvarellos, J. L., & Zahnle, K. 2012, Icarus, 218, 602 Bierhaus, E. B., Dones, L., & Robbins, S. 2015, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 47, #508.01 Brouwer, D., & Clemence, G. M. 1961, New York: Academic Press, 1961 Burns, J. A., & Gladman, B. J. 1998, Planet. Space Sci., 46, 1401 Canup, R. M. 2010, Nature, 468, 943 Chambers, J. E., Quintana, E. V., Duncan, M. J., & Lissauer, J. J. 2002, AJ, 123, 2884 Charnoz, S., Crida, A., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., et al. 2011, Icarus, 216, 535 Chen, E. M. A., & Nimmo, F. 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L19203 Chen, E. M. A., Nimmo, F., & Glatzmaier, G. A. 2014, Icarus, 229, 11 Chiang, E., & Laughlin, G. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3444 Crida, A., & Charnoz, S. 2012, Science, 338, 1196 ´Cuk, M., & Stewart, S. T. 2012, Science, 338, 1047 ´Cuk, M., Dones, L., & Nesvorn´y, D. 2013, arXiv:1311.6780 – 51 – Cuzzi, J. N., Burns, J. A., Charnoz, S., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 1470 Danby, J. M. A. 1992. Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics. Richmond: Willman-Bell, 1992, 2nd ed. Dermott, S. F. 1971, MNRAS, 153, 83 Dermott, S. F., & Murray, C. D. 1981, Icarus, 48, 1 Astronomy Meeting 46, #304.01. Dones, L., Chapman, C. R., McKinnon, W. B., et al. 2009, Saturn from Cassini-Huygens, 613 Forest, E., & Ruth, R. D. 1990, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, 43, 105 Gavrilov, S. V., & Zharkov, V. N. 1977, Icarus, 32, 443 Goldreich, P., Lithwick, Y., & Sari, R. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 549 Greenberg, R. 1973a, AJ, 78, 338 Greenberg, R. 1973b, MNRAS, 165, 305 Greenberg, R. 1981, AJ, 86, 912 Hamilton, D. P. 2013, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 45, #302.01 Howett, C. J. A., Spencer, J. R., Pearl, J., & Segura, M. 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 116, 3003 Howett, C., Spencer, J., & Verbiscer, A. 2014, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 46, #405.02 Kirchoff, M. R., & Schenk, P. 2010, Icarus, 206, 485 Lainey, V., Karatekin, O., Desmars, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 14 – 52 – Lainey, V., Jacobson, R. A., Tajeddine, R., et al. 2015, arXiv:1510.05870 Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T. 2012, ApJ, 745, 79 Levison, H. F., & Duncan, M. J. 1994, Icarus, 108, 18 Meyer, J., & Wisdom, J. 2007, Icarus, 188, 535 Meyer, J., & Wisdom, J. 2008, Icarus, 193, 213 Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge U. Press Ogilvie, G. I. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 171 Peale, S. J. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 533 Porco, C. C., Helfenstein, P., Thomas, P. C., et al. 2006, Science, 311, 1393 Remus, F., Mathis, S., Zahn, J.-P., & Lainey, V. 2015, A&A, 573, A23 Sagan, C., & Dermott, S. F. 1982, Nature, 300, 731 Sinclair, A. T. 1983, IAU Colloq. 74: Dynamical Trapping and Evolution in the Solar System, 106, 19 Sohl, F., Sears, W. D., & Lorenz, R. D. 1995, Icarus, 115, 278 Storch, N. I., & Lai, D. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3952 Touma, J., & Wisdom, J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1653 Wisdom, J., & Holman, M. 1991, AJ, 102, 1528 Wisdom, J., & Tian, Z. 2015, Icarus, 256, 138 Zhang, K., & Nimmo, F. 2012, Icarus, 218, 348 – 53 – This manuscript was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2.
1305.0833	1	1305	2013-05-03T20:11:35	Warm Spitzer Photometry of Three Hot Jupiters: HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We present Warm Spitzer/IRAC secondary eclipse time series photometry of three short-period transiting exoplanets, HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, in both the available 3.6 and 4.5 micron bands. HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b are Jupiter-mass, objects orbiting an early K and an early G dwarf stars, respectively. For HAT-P-3b we find eclipse depths of 0.112%+0.015%-0.030% (3.6 micron) and 0.094%+0.016%-0.009% (4.5 micron). The HAT-P-4b values are 0.142%+0.014%-0.016% (3.6 micron) and 0.122%+0.012%-0.014% (4.5micron). The two planets' photometry is consistent with inefficient heat redistribution from their day to night sides (and low albedos), but it is inconclusive about possible temperature inversions in their atmospheres. HAT-P-12b is a Saturn-mass planet and is one of the coolest planets ever observed during secondary eclipse, along with hot Neptune GJ 436b and hot Saturn WASP-29b. We are able to place 3$\sigma$ upper limits on the secondary eclipse depth of HAT-P-12b in both wavelengths: < 0.042% (3.6 micron) and <0.085% (4.5 micron). We discuss these results in the context of the {\it Spitzer} secondary eclipse measurements of GJ 436b and WASP-29b. It is possible that we do not detect the eclipses of HAT-P-12b due to high eccentricity, but find that weak planetary emission in these wavelengths is a more likely explanation. We place 3 sigma upper limits on the \|e cos(omega)\| quantity (where e is eccentricity and omega is the argument of periapsis) for HAT-P-3b (<0.0081) and HAT-P-4b (<0.0042), based on the secondary eclipse timings.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version September 13, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 04/17/13 WARM SPITZER PHOTOMETRY OF THREE HOT JUPITERS: HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b AND HAT-P-12b Kamen O. Todorov1 ,2 ,3, Drake Deming3, Heather A. Knutson4, Adam Burrows5, Jonathan J. Fortney6, Nikole K. Lewis7 ,8, Nicolas B. Cowan9, Eric Agol10, Jean-Michel Desert8 , 11, Pedro V. Sada12, David Charbonneau13, Gregory Laughlin6, Jonathan Langton14, Adam P. Showman15 Draft version September 13, 2018 ABSTRACT −0.016% (3.6 µm) and 0.122%+0.012% We present Warm Spitzer/IRAC secondary eclipse time series photometry of three short-period transiting exoplanets, HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, in both the available 3.6 and 4.5 µm bands. HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b are Jupiter-mass, objects orbiting an early K and an early G dwarf stars, respectively. For HAT-P-3b we find eclipse depths of 0.112%+0.015% −0.030% (3.6 µm) and 0.094%+0.016% −0.009% (4.5 µm). The HAT-P-4b values are 0.142%+0.014% −0.014%(4.5 µm). The two planets' photometry is consistent with inefficient heat redistribution from their day to night sides (and low albedos), but it is inconclusive about possible temperature inversions in their atmospheres. HAT- P-12b is a Saturn-mass planet and is one of the coolest planets ever observed during secondary eclipse, along with hot Neptune GJ 436b and hot Saturn WASP-29b. We are able to place 3σ upper limits on the secondary eclipse depth of HAT-P-12b in both wavelengths: < 0.042% (3.6 µm) and < 0.085% (4.5 µm). We discuss these results in the context of the Spitzer secondary eclipse measurements of GJ 436b and WASP-29b. It is possible that we do not detect the eclipses of HAT-P-12b due to high eccentricity, but find that weak planetary emission in these wavelengths is a more likely explanation. We place 3σ upper limits on the e cos ω quantity (where e is eccentricity and ω is the argument of periapsis) for HAT-P-3b (< 0.0081) and HAT-P-4b (< 0.0042), based on the secondary eclipse timings. Subject headings: stars: planetary systems -- eclipses -- techniques: photometric 1. INTRODUCTION There are about 177 confirmed exoplanets with orbital periods of less than 10 days and masses greater than 0.1 Jupiter mass, which are often referred to as "hot Jupiters". About 145 of them transit their host stars16. Hot Jupiters have high equilibrium temperatures, often over 1000 K, due to their proximity to their parent stars. 1 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylva- nia State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 2 Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsylva- nia State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 3 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA 4 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Insti- tute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 6 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Cal- ifornia at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 7 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 8 Sagan Fellow 9 CIERA Fellow, Department of Physics & Astronomy, North- western University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA 10 Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 11 Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12 University of Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico 13 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 14 Department of Physics, Principia College, Elsah, IL 62028, USA 15 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tuc- son, AZ 85721, USA 16 Determined from the Exoplanet Orbit Database (Wright et al. 2011) at http://exoplanets.org These planets make ideal targets for the Spitzer Space Telescope, which can directly detect their thermal emis- sion via time series photometry in the infra-red during secondary eclipse. The drop of total light from the planet-star system as the planet moves behind the star was first mea- sured independently by Charbonneau et al. (2005) and Deming et al. (2005). By measuring the eclipse depth in several photometric bands, one can construct a very low resolution emergent spectrum of the observed planet in the infrared (Charbonneau et al. 2008; Grillmair et al. 2008). Comparison of similar spectra with models has suggested that there are two types of hot Jupiter atmo- spheres based on the presence or absence of temperature inversions in their upper layers (e.g., Knutson et al. 2008; Machalek et al. 2009; Todorov et al. 2010; Beerer et al. 2011; Deming et al. 2011; Todorov et al. 2012). The mechanisms that create such inversions are not well established, but it is generally believed that planets with an inverted atmosphere have an additional opac- ity source in their atmospheres' upper layers, where the pressure falls below ∼ 0.01 bar (Burrows et al. 2008; Fortney et al. 2008). In the past, this opacity source has been suggested to be gas phase TiO (Hubeny et al. 2003; Burrows et al. 2007, 2008; Fortney et al. 2006a, 2008). However, this molecule may form grains on the night sides and in cold traps deep in the atmospheres on the day sides of some hot Jupiters with inversions such as HD 209458b, where the pressure-temperature profiles are expected to cross the condensation curve of TiO (Spiegel et al. 2009). In addition, TrES-3 is suffi- ciently heated to have gas phase TiO in its atmosphere, yet has no temperature inversion (Fressin et al. 2010), 2 Todorov et al. while XO-1b is too cool to maintain it, but appears to have an inverted atmosphere (Machalek et al. 2008). On the other hand, a more recent 3D mixing study of hot Jupiter atmospheres (Parmentier et al. 2013) has shown that TiO may stay aloft in HD 209458b's atmosphere due to strong vertical mixing, if it forms grains no larger than several microns. According to this investigation, TiO in the form of larger particles should be depleted by the day-night cold trap. Thus, the role of TiO in the for- mation of temperature inversions remains controversial. There are at least two alternative explanations for the presence or absence of temperature inversions. Zahnle et al. (2009) suggested that sulfur compounds may account for the stratospheric opacity in some hot Jupiter atmospheres. Another hypothesis is that the presence or absence of temperature inversions is corre- lated with the magnetic activity and related UV flux from the host star (Knutson et al. 2010). According to this idea, the increased UV flux received by planets or- biting active stars destroys the molecule responsible for the formation of temperature inversions. We can test these hypotheses by building up a large sample of hot Jupiters with secondary eclipse measure- ments and search for correlations with other system pa- rameters, such as stellar activity or the Ti abundance in the stellar photosphere. Although the Spitzer Space Telescope exhausted the last of its cryogen in May 2009, it still remains the best facility for carrying out these ob- servations. The observatory has continued operating at a higher temperature of approximately 29 K, cooled by passive radiation. Only two photometric bands are still available, the 3.6 and 4.5 µm channels of the Infra-Red Array Camera (IRAC, Fazio et al. 2004). Fortunately, measurements in these two bands are often sufficient to constrain the presence or absence of temperature inver- sion in the upper layers of hot Jupiters (Knutson et al. 2010). The energy budget is another aspect of transiting hot Jupiters that can be studied via secondary eclipse pho- tometry. These planets are expected to tidally evolve within ∼ 1 Gyr of their formation, and their rotation periods should become equal to their orbital periods, as- suming zero eccentricity (Correia & Laskar 2010). The transfer of heat from the day side to the night side can have strong influence on the emergent wavelength de- pendent flux of the day side of the planet, which is mea- sured directly by estimating the secondary eclipse depth at a given wavelength. Relating observations to atmo- spheric models can place constraints on the heat redis- tribution efficiency and the Bond albedo of the planet (Cowan & Agol 2011). The authors of this study sug- gest that planets with very high equilibrium tempera- tures have a narrow range of Td/T0, where Td is the effective dayside temperature and T0 is the equilibrium temperature at the substellar point. This ratio is a mea- sure of the redistribution efficiency of the atmosphere, which Cowan & Agol (2011) find to be uniformly low for the hottest planets, while cooler planets appear to exhibit higher range of heat redistribution efficiencies and/or albedos. In this paper we present Warm Spitzer time series pho- tometry of three short period transiting exoplanets -- HAT-P-3b (Torres et al. 2007), HAT-P-4b (Kov´acs et al. 2007) and HAT-P-12b (Hartman et al. 2009). The phys- ical properties of the systems are listed in Table 1. In a previous paper (Todorov et al. 2012), we focused on Warm Spitzer secondary eclipse photometry of three planets (XO-4b, HAT-P-6b and HAT-P-8b) with masses comparable to Jupiter's, orbiting F dwarfs. The mag- netic activity of stars as indicated by the Ca II H&K line strengths is uncalibrated for effective temperatures over 6200 K or under 4200 K (Noyes et al. 1984). Since the host stars of all three of these targets were above or close to the 6200 K boundary, our results did not re- liably test the correlation between magnetic activity of the host star and the atmospheric inversions proposed by Knutson et al. (2010), which relies on Ca II H&K line measurements for assessing the magnetic activity of the stars. Therefore, in order to better cover the available param- eter space, for this analysis we have chosen planets that orbit host stars with effective temperatures within the 4200 -- 6200 K range. Our targets are less massive than Jupiter (the least massive, HAT-P-12b, has a mass simi- lar to Saturn's), but have radii similar to Jupiter's. In ad- dition to the secondary eclipse depth measurements, we combine their timings with the most precise ephemerides available (HAT-P-3, HAT-P-4: Sada et al. (2012), HAT- P-12: this paper) to constrain the orbital eccentricity of the planets. For this analysis, we update the code developed by Todorov et al. (2012), to make use of full array mode ob- servations (in the cases of HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12) and variable aperture photometry (Lewis et al. 2013). We es- timated the uncertainty of the eclipse depth and timing with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo and prayer-bead al- gorithms. It is in principle possible to use this code to analyze all available Spitzer secondary eclipse data sets in a single investigation, but we find that every data set has peculiarities that need to be addressed on individ- ual basis. We analyze and report eclipse results for hot Jupiters in groups of three because this allows for the ef- ficiency of analyzing data for multiple exoplanets, while retaining the ability to cope with the quirks of individual data sets. In Section 2 we present the Spitzer observations and our photometry procedures. The details of the time se- ries analysis and the uncertainty estimation are presented in Section 3. We discuss our results in the context of pre- vious studies in Section 4. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND PHOTOMETRY 2.1. Secondary Eclipse Observations with Spitzer We observed the secondary eclipses using the Infra- Red Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Tele- scope in both the 3.6 µm and the 4.5 µm channels. The observations on the HAT-P-3 system in both pass-bands utilized the IRAC subarray mode, resulting in 32 × 32 pixel (39′′×39′′) images, centered on the planet's host star. The HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12 data are in full ar- ray mode, where each image is taken has the full IRAC resolution of 256 × 256 pixels (5.2′×5.2′). The subarray mode images are stacked in FITS data cubes that contain 64 exposures taken in a sequence. Our HAT-P-3 observations have effective exposure times per image of 1.92 s in both pass-bands. The full array data have effective exposure times of 4.4 s (HAT-P-4) and Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 3 10.4 s (HAT-P-12) per image respectively in both wave- lengths. Each secondary eclipse observation of HAT-P- 3b lasted for 7 h 42 min resulting in 13,760 images (215 data cubes). The observations of HAT-P-4b covered 7 h 38 min, resulting in 3,871 images in each wavelength, while those of HAT-P-12b lasted almost as long -- 7 h 37 min -- but resulted in only 2,097 images per pass-band, due to the longer exposure time. Complete information about the time span of the ob- servations is presented in Table 3. 2.2. Photometry and Time Information Extraction Our time-stamp extraction routine is very similar to the one used by Todorov et al. (2012). In all data sets, we perform the extraction on the Basic Calibrated Data (BCD) files produced by version S18.18.0 of the Spitzer pipeline. For timing of the photometric points, we rely on the MJD OBS keyword in the FITS headers, cor- rected to indicate the mid-exposure time. We convert this time stamp, given in modified Julian date, based on the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) standard (MJDUTC), to Barycentric Julian Date based on the Ter- restrial Time standard (BJDTT) using Jason Eastman's IDL routine get spitzer bjd (Eastman et al. 2010). We prefer to use the TT standard rather than UTC, be- cause the latter is discontinuous and has leap seconds introduced occasionally. At the time of our observations, TT ≈ UTC+66.184 s. We convert the pixel intensities from MJy/sr to elec- tron counts using the the information provided in the im- age headers, in order to be able to estimate the Poisson noise of the photometry. The data are filtered for ener- getic particle hits by following each pixel through time. This is done in two passes, first flagging all pixels 8 σ or more away from a boxcar median through time with width 5. Their values are replaced with the local boxcar median value. In the second pass, all values more than 4 σ away from the boxcar median through time (again with width 5) are flagged and their values are replaced with the local median value. For the HAT-P-3 data, this procedure is performed separately for each data cube in- stead of for the whole time series in order to avoid pixel rejection due to the sharp changes in background that occur between the last frame from one cube and the first frame from the next. This effect is similar to the one seen by Deming et al. (2011). The fraction of cor- rected pixels is about 0.53% (HAT-P-3, at 3.6 µm), 0.12% (HAT-P-3, at 4.5 µm), 0.13% (HAT-P-4, at both chan- nels), 0.22% (HAT-P-12, at 3.6 µm) and 0.24% (HAT-P- 12, at 4.5 µm). We estimate the background flux from the full-array images by creating a histogram of all pixel values for each frame and fitting a Gaussian function. We correct for contamination by field stars and energetic particle hits by fitting only to the central portion of the histogram and excluding the regions that account for the high pho- ton count pixels. We test for variable background across the full-array images by measuring the background based on 30×30, 50×50, and 100×100 pixel boxes centered on the star-planet system (which was always positioned in the center of the array). Removing the background from the photometry in this manner produces at most 0.7% change in the photometric scatter around a running me- dian of width 20 of the photometry compared to data reduction using the whole array to estimate background, in all data sets. This is marginal, therefore, we elect to maximize our background determination precision and use the whole array to determine the background lev- els. Since the subarray mode observations of HAT-P-3 result in only 32 × 32 pixel images, we exclude a 5 × 5 pixel square centered on the star from the histograms for these data, in order to avoid biasing the background estimation to higher values. In order to locate the centroid of the stellar point re- sponse function (PRF) we experiment with fitting a two- dimensional Gaussian function to the core of the stellar image (Agol et al. 2010) and with flux-weighted centroid- ing (e.g., Charbonneau et al. 2008; Knutson et al. 2008). We find that in most cases there is an improvement in the standard deviation of the residuals that remain after we subtract our best fit model from the photometry, if we adopt flux-weighted centroiding. The only exception is the HAT-P-3b 4.5µm data set, where the difference in the resulting scatter is marginal (∼ 0.1%). Therefore, we adopt flux-weighted centroiding for all data sets in this analysis. We experiment with two different photometry ap- proaches. First, we perform aperture photometry, using the IDL routine aper17, varying the aperture radius in increments of 0.5 pixels between 1.5 and 6.5 pixels. We select the best photometry aperture radius by measuring the true scatter it produces around a boxcar median of the raw light curve with width 20. The scatter is not strongly correlated with aperture radius. For the HAT- P-3 subarray mode data, the minimum scatter is found at 2.5px (3.6 µm) and 3.0px (4.5 µm) pixel radii. For the full array mode data we find that the smallest scatter occurs at pixel radii of 4.0px (HAT-P-4, 3.6 µm), 3.0px (HAT-P-4, 4.5 µm), 5.0px (HAT-P-12, 3.6 µm) and 2.5px (HAT-P-12, 4.5 µm). Separately, we perform photometry on all data by us- ing time-variable aperture. For each image, we estimate the noise-pixel parameter (Mighell 2005; Knutson et al. 2012; Lewis et al. 2013), which is a measure of the width of the stellar point spread function (PSF). It is defined in Section 2.2.2 of the Spitzer/IRAC instrument handbook as: , (1) β = (ΣiIi)2 ΣiI 2 i where Ii is the intensity detected by the ith pixel. The noise pixel parameter, β, is proportional to the full- width-half-maximum of the stellar PSF (Mighell 2005). For each image, we calculate the photometric aperture radius: r = q βb + c, (2) where b is a scaling factor and c is a constant. In each image frame, we measure the flux used to determine β using circular aperture radii between 1.0 and 6.5 pixels. If any part of a pixel falls within the aperture radius, it is fully included in the β calculation. For each of these values, we vary b and c in steps of 0.05. We fit each of the resulting light curves with our "systematics-and- eclipse" model and find the combination of photometric 17 http://idlastro.gsfc.nasa.gov/ 4 Todorov et al. time parameters that yields the smallest standard deviation of the residuals. For the 3.6µm data sets, the variable aperture photom- etry approach yields lower residual scatter values (be- tween 3 and 7%), reduces the amplitude of the periodic flux oscillation in the raw data by about 50% and re- duces the levels of correlated noise in the residuals after the best fits to the data are subtracted from the photome- try. This is particularly evident in the HAT-P-12b 3.6µm light curve, where fixed aperture photometry yields sig- nificantly different eclipse depths (between −0.07% and 0.07%, which is above our final 3σ eclipse depth limit) based on the radius of the photometric aperture and the method for decorrelation of the intra-pixel effect. In the 4.5µm light curves, the residual scatter values are consistently, but marginally smaller for the variable aperture than for fixed aperture (between 0.1 and 1%). There is also a slight improvement in the residual corre- lated noise levels in the light curves after decorrelation. Therefore, we adopt variable aperture in the final analy- sis for all data sets. The photometry parameters we used are summarized in Table 2. The raw photometry during secondary eclipse for the three planets is presented in Figure 1. 3. DATA ANALYSIS 3.1. Ephemerides The data analysis routines fit the eclipse models to the light curves as a function of orbital phase. There- fore, the best available estimates of the ephemerides of the planets are needed in order to calculate the orbital phase with minimum uncertainty. For HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b, we use the ephemerides given in Sada et al. (2012). The ephemeris provided in that paper for HAT- P-12b, however, does not include the transits observed recently by Lee et al. (2012), and vice versa. We com- bine the transit timings provided by both groups with other transit timings from the literature (Table 4). The results are T0 = 2454187.85559 ± 0.00011 in BJDTT and P = 3.21305929 ± 0.00000034 days. The offsets in min- utes between the best fit ephemeris and the transit tim- ings are shown in Figure 2, and they are consistent with an unperturbed orbit. 3.2. Secondary Eclipse Fits 3.2.1. Data Examination The secondary eclipse depth is only measurable in Spitzer time series photometry after careful removal of any instrumental effects. We normalize the light curve so that the mean brightness of the target system during eclipse is unity, corresponding to the light of the star only. We remove any data that have high backgrounds or are outliers (9 frames for HAT-P-3 at 3.6 µm, 5 frames for HAT-P-3 at 4.5 µm, 22 frames for HAT-P-4 at 3.6 µm, 42 frames for HAT-P-4 at 4.5 µm, 75 frames for HAT- P-12 at 3.6 µm and 26 frames for HAT-P-12 at 4.5 µm). Like previous investigators (e.g. Harrington et al. 2007; Agol et al. 2010; Deming et al. 2011; Cowan et al. 2012; Todorov et al. 2012), we find that the 57th frame in each data cube in the subarray mode exhibits a relatively high background value, and we exclude all these images from the analysis (215 frames in each HAT-P-3b band). (2012), causes Previous photometry with both during the the series cryo- Spitzer/IRAC instrument, genic and warm missions, has revealed two different transient instrumental effects. First, it often takes tens of minutes for the target star's position on the detector to stabilize (e.g., Anderson et al. 2011). This initial position instability causes apparent changes in intensity because it involves portions of the detector that have different intrapixel sensitivity variations than the ones used the most during the observation. The second effect, seen by e.g., Campo et al. (2011); Deming et al. (2011); Todorov et al. the apparent brightness at the start of some observations at 3.6 µm to increase or decrease in an exponential-like manner before stabilizing, without correlation with the position of the stellar image on the detector. This behavior is similar to that observed in the longer-wavelength IRAC arrays and is believed to be due to charge-trapping (e.g., Knutson et al. 2007; Agol et al. 2010). The simplest way of correcting for these effects is to clip the initial portion of the time series. Therefore, we discard the initial 48 min 42 sec from the HAT-P-3 data at 4.5 µm, corresponding to 1423 frames taken before orbital phase of 0.44. We do not find it necessary to clip the HAT-P-3 at 3.6 µm data, or the HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12 time series in either wavelength. The corrected light curves are shown in Figure 3. 3.2.2. Initial Fitting Procedure Our procedure for determining the most suitable systematics and eclipse model is similar to that of Todorov et al. (2012) -- we assume a central phase of the eclipse and perform a simultaneous linear regression fit for all free parameters to the unbinned light curve. We make incremental increases to the initial assumed phase to scan a wide range of possible central phases of the eclipse, and fit a new model to the data, after each step in phase. We track the χ2 values of the best regression fits as we make the scan. The step size in phase is 10−5 for all data sets, and we cover the phase intervals be- tween 0.48 and 0.52. We experiment with larger phase ranges, especially in the case of HAT-P-12b, but without an improvement in the results. We employ a computational model describing the sys- tematic and astrophysical effects observed in our data sets similar to the one used by Todorov et al. (2012). Similarly to previous studies (e.g., Knutson et al. 2009; Beerer et al. 2011; Deming et al. 2011), we find a correla- tion between the X and Y position of the stellar image on the pixels and the measured brightness of the star. As in Todorov et al. (2012), for a given eclipse central phase, we adopt a model of the systematics with a quadratic dependence between X and Y in intrapixel coordinates without cross-terms and the intensity and a linear ramp with time: I(t) = at + b1X + b2X 2 + c1Y + c2Y 2 + I0 + e1M, (3) where I(t) is the intensity as a function of time, t is time in units of phase, X and Y are the positions of the stel- lar centroid on the pixel in the x and y directions, M eclipse shape model, and a, b1, b2, c1, c2, I0 (the ordinate axis intercept) and e1 (the eclipse depth) are the free pa- rameters. We also experimented with adding the noise Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 5 pixel parameter, β, as a third dimension in the spatial fit, but we noticed no improvement in the quality of the fits. Thus, we have not included β in the fit. Multiple previ- ous studies have also settled on quadratic X and Y decor- relation (e.g., Charbonneau et al. 2008; Knutson et al. 2008; Christiansen et al. 2010; Anderson et al. 2011; Cochran et al. 2011; Demory et al. 2011; D´esert et al. 2011). We experiment by setting all combinations of a, b2 and c2, to 0 and examine the residuals, but we find that the lowest residual scatter occurs when all parameters are left free (as expected). We, therefore, attempt to use the Bayesian information criterion test (BIC) to determine the optimal number of free parameters. We find that for HAT-P-3b (both wave- lengths) and HAT-P-12b at 3.6 µm setting b2 = 0 results in minimum BIC. The BIC for HAT-P-4b at 4.5 µm is minimized by setting all parameters free. The minimum BICs for HAT-P-4b at 3.6 µm and HAT-P-12b at 4.5 µm are found when b2 and c2, are set to 0. However, for these data sets, this results in red noise with large amplitude in the residuals, and an unrealistically large eclipse depth value for HAT-P-4b at 3.6 µm. Setting b2 and c2, free minimizes the red noise amplitudes in these light curves. For all other data sets, regardless of the choice of pa- rameters, the eclipse depth and central phase values are within one sigma of each other. We experiment with adding higher order terms to Equation 3, but this does not lead to improvements in the red noise reduction or the BIC values, and to only to marginal improvements in the scatter of the residuals. Therefore, we conclude that the BIC test is not ideally suited for the correction of the systematic noise in our data. To further motivate this, suppose we found two curves that accounted for the intra-pixel effect, and their best- fits were essentially the same curve (i.e. they lay on top of each other), but one used many more parame- ters. We certainly would not be justified in identifying the additional parameters with the physical properties of the detector (lacking a priori information on the physics of the effect). However, as far as removing the effect from the photometry, we could use either curve because they would produce the same decorrelated photometry, although their BIC values might be very different. Thus, the BIC is not necessarily relevant, because we're not seeking information about the detector. The BIC would be valuable in distinguishing various decorrelation mod- els if they did not overlap each other, and one curve pro- duced a significantly smaller χ2 value. However, in our data adding cubic and higher terms to the decorrelation polynomial produces only marginal decreases in the χ2. Thus, we elect not to use the BIC to determine the optimal number of free parameters and choose to keep all parameters in Equation 3 free, while not adding any higher order terms. The measured eclipse depths for the HAT-P-12 data sets are consistent with zero. We experiment by remov- ing various portions of the data at the start and the end of the observations. The resulting fits have cen- tral phases covering the whole explored range, and the eclipse depths take small negative or positive values. We conclude that our photometric precision is insufficient to detect the eclipse in these data sets and we place upper limits on its depth. For completeness, we experiment with substituting the quadratic dependencies of intensity on X and Y with a weighting function, as described by Ballard et al. (2010a), which essentially multiplies each photometric point by a "weight", dependent on the X and Y positions of the stellar image on the detector. The apparent bright- ness of the star is smoothed as a function of X and Y on the IRAC array, with smoothing widths σx and σy. The in-eclipse data are excluded to prevent the decorrelation from removing it as a systematic effect. We optimize the smoothing widths to minimize the scatter in the residu- als of the data after subtracting the best fit model. For the 3.6 µm data we settle on σx = 0.00425, 0.00638, and 0.00723 and σy = 0.00723, 0.00638, and 0.01064 for HAT- P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, respectively. For the 4.5 µm data, we use σx = 0.00894, 0.03404, and 0.03404 and σy = 0.00936, 0.02085, and 0.03574, again for HAT- P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, respectively. In this case, the BIC is not an adequate measure to compare the resulting fits, since this is a non-parametric correction of systematic effects (for more details on the applicability of the BIC, see e.g., Stevenson et al. 2012). Therefore, we compare the mean standard deviations of the residuals after subtracting the models from the photometry. We find that the scatters produced by weighting function fits are comparable or slightly larger than the ones from our polynomial fits, and using the weighting function decor- relation does not improve the correlated noise removal. Therefore, we elect to use quadratic fits in X and Y for all data. 3.2.3. Best Parameter Values and Uncertainty Estimates In order to determine the best parameter values and their uncertainties, we utilize two approaches -- Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and prayer-bead Monte Carlo (PBMC). We first discuss our implementation of these algorithms, and then focus on our best fit param- eter determination approach. We implement a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) code in order to quantify the uncertainties on the eclipse depths and central phases that we measure. We follow the recipe suggested by Ford (2005, 2006), taking steps in one parameter at a time, and drawing the steps from a Gaussian probability distribution. We perform 106 iter- ations per free parameter. Here, we add central phase as a formal free parameter. Before running the main chain, we run several shorter chains to optimize the most likely step size for each parameter result in acceptance rates between 35% and 55%. A typical acceptance rate for all parameters and all data sets is ∼ 45%, which is near the ideal rate suggested by Ford (2006, and references therein). We run the MCMCs for 7 × 106 steps. Using the steps from the Markov chains, we create his- tograms of the eclipse depth and central phase values during a given run. These have shapes close to Gaus- sian (for the eclipse depth histograms, see Figure 4) and we estimate the uncertainties on the astrophysical pa- rameters by calculating their standard deviations from the best fit values. MCMC histograms tend to be close to Gaussians even for data sets dominated by correlated noise, since this algorithm assumes white noise. The MCMC fails to converge on a solution for the two HAT-P-12 data sets, due to the undetectable eclipses. Hence, we report the upper limit for the eclipse depths 6 Todorov et al. based on the regression analysis uncertainty, assuming central phase of 0.50007. This number includes the light travel time delay assuming ecos(ω) = 0, but does not in- clude any apparent delay that may be due to the hottest point on the planet trailing behind the substellar point along the orbit. This effect causes a typically small de- lay, about 20−30 s (e.g., Knutson et al. 2007; Agol et al. 2010). Similarly to, e.g., D´esert et al. (2011); Deming et al. (2011); Todorov et al. (2012), we obtain an estimate of the systematic uncertainties due to correlated red noise by performing a "prayer-bead" analysis (Gillon et al. 2007a). In this method the residuals of the best regres- sion fit are shifted right by one frame (last frame becomes first) and added back to the best fit model, thus creat- ing a simulated data set with the red noise preserved. We perform a fit to the simulated data set using the algorithm described in Section 3.2.2. We record the re- sulting eclipse depth and central phase, and simulate an- other data set by shifting the residuals of the original best fit again. The histograms of the resulting eclipse depth distributions are presented in Figure 4. They are non-Gaussian, as expected for red noise dominated data sets, but begin to approach a Gaussian for data where the white noise dominates. The smallest χ2 value of a fit represents the best fit value only in data sets dominated by Gaussian noise. The Spitzer light curves, however, are often dominated by red noise, which is not correlated in time with the astrophysical signal. Therefore, for a red noise domi- nated light curve, any of the data sets simulated in the PBMC simulation run could have been the observed data set. Hence, for both eclipse depth and central phase, we elect to report our best fit value to be the median in the histogram of a parameter from the MCMC or PBMC fit simulations, whichever yields the larger uncertainty range. We adopt the corresponding uncertainties (Fig- ure 4). If the data sets are dominated by Gaussian noise, our approach reduces to adopting the parameter values that yield the smallest χ2. −0.030 and 0.094+0.016 The best fit eclipse depths from the original data are very close to the medians from the Monte Carlo runs. For the HAT-P-3 data, the original data best fits are 0.108% and 0.096% versus Monte Carlo median eclipses of 0.112+0.015 −0.009 at 3.6 and 4.5 µm, re- spectively. In both cases, this is a difference of about 0.13σ. The HAT-P-4b original data eclipses are 0.142% and 0.124% versus 0.142+0.014 −0.014 from the Monte Carlo runs at 3.6 and 4.5 µm, respectively. The difference between these values is 0σ (3.6 µm) and 0.17σ (4.5 µm). Thus, the exact choice of "best values" has no impact on our results. −0.016 and 0.122+0.012 We summarize the Monte Carlo results we adopt as final in Table 5. The uncertainties in central phase in that table include an uncertainty contribution from the ephemeris, but this is small (∼ 1% of the total timing uncertainty). The eclipse central times in BJDTT are independent of any uncertainty in the ephemeris. 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. Comparison to Models We compare our eclipse depth measurements to two sets of models, by Burrows et al. (2007, 2008) and Fortney et al. (2005, 2006a,b, 2008), in order to bet- ter understand their implications for the thermal struc- tures and heat transport efficiency of the planetary at- mospheres (Figure 5). The chemical equilibrium and opacities in the Burrows models are based on studies by Burrows & Sharp (1999) and Sharp & Burrows (2007), respectively. The parameters in these models that are relevant to us are κabs, the absorption coefficient of the unknown stratospheric absorber, and Pn, the heat re- distribution parameter, which describes the amount of stellar flux transported from the day side of the planet to its night side. κabs has units of cm2 g−1, while Pn is unitless and varies between 0 (no redistribution) and 0.5 (complete redistribution). In the Fortney models, essentially, only the heat re- distribution efficiency, f , is a free parameter. The high altitude TiO and VO at equilibrium abundances serve as absorbers causing temperature inversions when needed to explain the data. The heat redistribution efficiency varies between f = 0.25 (indicating that the flux is evenly distributed over the whole planet) and f = 0.67 (corre- sponding to no flux redistribution at all, even within day- side regions of different temperature). The value f = 0.5 signifies that flux is evenly redistributed on the day-side of the planet, but no heat leaks to the night side. The atmospheres in the Fortney models have solar compo- sitions, except the f = 0.6 HAT-P-12b model (shown in red in Figure 5), which has a 30× solar metallicity. Neither the Fortney nor Burrows models account for the presence of clouds or disequilibrium chemical processes. "Fitting" these models in the mathematical sense is not practical. In the Fortney models one can vary f and the presence or absence of TiO and VO, while the Burrows models have κabs and Pn as free parameters, but neither set of models is intended to include an algorithm to ad- just these parameters according to the data as part of the model calculation. The best approach available with the current state of the model codes is to compute a range of models for a given planet covering the parameter space, and then to select manually the one that accounts best for the data. For HAT-P-3b, we visually examine Bur- rows models with κabs between 0 and 0.1 cm2 g−1, and Pn between 0.1 and 0.3; for HAT-P-4b we look at κabs between 0 and 0.2 cm2 g−1, and Pn between 0.1 and 0.3; and for HAT-P-12b we experiment with κabs between 0 and 0.1 cm2 g−1, keeping Pn at a moderate value of 0.3. We also examine Fortney models with and without TiO and VO in the upper layers of the atmosphere, with f be- tween 0.25 and 0.6. Below, we discuss models that match the data well, and our conclusions for the atmosphere of each planet. 4.2. HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b HAT-P-3 displays a slightly enhanced level of chro- mospheric activity, with calcium H&K activity index log(R′ HK) = −4.904 (Knutson et al. 2010). This could explain some of the red noise evident in the light curves and PBMC runs for this planet (Figures 3 and 4). For HAT-P-3b (top panels in Figure 5), we adopt the Burrows model with κabs = 0.1 cm2 g−1 and Pn = 0.1, indicating an atmosphere with a temperature inversion and modest heat redistribution. We find that the atmo- sphere of HAT-P-3b is matched by a Fortney model with f = 0.6. This planet, like HAT-P-12b, is cool enough Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 7 that the presence of TiO and VO has practically no ef- fect on the shape of the spectra, and the Fortney mod- els cannot be used to distinguish between inverted and non-inverted temperature profiles. HAT-P-3b's eclipse depths are matched equally well by the almost identical inverted and non-inverted spectral models. Both sets of models, however, agree on low redistribu- tion efficiency, in apparent contradiction of the hypoth- esis of Perna et al. (2012) that hot Jupiters with irradi- ation temperature, Tirr . 2000 K have efficient flux re- distribution. In their convention, Tirr = Teff (R⋆/a)1/2, where Teff is the effective temperature of the star, R⋆ is the radius of the star and a is the semimajor axis. For HAT-P-3b, Tirr = 1600 K. Our result does not con- tradict (but does not support either) the hypothesis by Cowan & Agol (2011), who suggest that a wide range of redistribution efficiencies are possible for planets with Tǫ=0 . 2400 K, since Tǫ=0 = 1300 K for HAT-P-3b. HAT-P-4 is chromospherically quiet, with an activity index of log(R′ HK) = −5.082 (Knutson et al. 2010), and we find no significant perturbations to the light curves other than the eclipses. This planet is hotter than HAT- P-3b and HAT-P-12b and therefore has deeper eclipses, despite the fact that its host star is more luminous than the host stars of the other two. The HAT-P-4b models are presented in the middle panels in Figure 5. We find that a Burrows model that describes the data well has κabs = 0.2 cm2 g−1 and Pn = 0.1, corresponding to an inverted atmosphere with inefficient heat redistribution. The Fortney models with and without TiO and VO absorption in the upper atmo- sphere and f = 0.5 also seem to be close to the obser- vations. As in the HAT-P-3b case, the models appear to be ambiguous about any temperature inversions, but agree that the planet's atmosphere has moderate to low efficiency in redistributing heat to the night side. For HAT-P-4b, Tirr = 2400 K. Therefore, the ineffi- cient flux redistribution we observe is consistent with the idea that planets with Tirr above 2200-2400 K should have little flux transfer to their night sides (Perna et al. 2012; Cowan & Agol 2011). Knutson et al. (2010) hypothesize that while chromo- spherically active stars have planets with non-inverted atmospheres, planets around quiet stars have tempera- ture inversions. The difference between the activity in- dices of the host stars HAT-P-3 and HAT-P-4 is mini- mal (∆log(R′ HK) = 0.1), and both fall in the tentative border region where hot Jupiters can have inverted or non-inverted atmospheres and so predictions for the pres- ence or absence of an inversion are difficult. Due to this and the ambiguity of the models of the planetary atmo- spheres, we cannot make claims that support or contra- dict this idea based on our data on these two planets. 4.3. HAT-P-12b In principle, it is possible that we have failed to de- tect the HAT-P-12b eclipses due to a relatively large or- bital eccentricity. The discovery paper by Hartman et al. (2009) fixes the eccentricity at 0, which is what we have assumed in our determination of the upper limit of the eclipse depth. However, their initial fit results in a best value of e cos ω = 0.052 ± 0.025, which is in- significant. We estimate that we would have detected eclipses centered between phases of 0.45 and 0.55 (the range of our data in units of orbital phase), correspond- ing to e cos ω < 0.08. This is only about 1σ from the insignificant value by Hartman et al. (2009). Using the Exoplanet Orbit Database (http://exoplanets.org, Wright et al. 2011), we find that out of the 188 known transiting planets with periods less than 10 days, only 23 (∼ 12%) have orbital eccentricity over 0.08. Thus, we conclude that it is possible that we have missed the eclipse due to eccentricity larger than ∼ 0.08, but that weak eclipses are a more likely explanation. Despite the formal non-detection, the HAT-P-12b 4.5 µm light curve in Figure 3 appears to the eye to contain an eclipse. Allowing for a quadratic out-of- eclipse variation (due to, e.g., stellar spots or phase- variation), then we find a non-zero eclipse depth of ∼ 0.049% ± 0.021% (a ∼ 2.5σ result; still not a de- tection). This result is well within one sigma of the best value in Figure 4, but is in better agreement with the non-inverted Burrows model. However, none of the other light curves requires anything but a flat out-of- eclipse baseline. Using a quadratic curve to allow for phase variation will naturally cause any eclipse in the data to look deeper, since the assumed maximum of the quadratic curve is near mid-eclipse, above what is ex- pected for a flat baseline. On the other hand, the ap- pearance of an eclipse and a phase curve variation is likely to be caused by instrumental red noise, given the lack of similar signatures in the other two 4.5 µm curves. HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b are hotter than HAT-P-12b and have deeper eclipses, so any phase curve variability should be higher for them. In addition, the HAT-P-12 host star has a Ca II H&K activity index, log(R′ HK), of about −5.1 (Knutson et al. 2010), so stellar spots should be a less important factor than in the light curve than they are, e.g., in the Sun (log(R′ HK) = −4.9, Noyes et al. 1984). Hence, we conclude that a quadratic out-of-eclipse variation does not improve our results. We are only able to place upper limits on the secondary eclipses of HAT-P-12b, (assuming e cos ω = 0), how- ever, we can still compare these results to atmospheric models (lower panels in Figure 5). Both the inverted Bur- rows (0.1 cm2 g−1, Pn = 0.3) and the Fortney (f = 0.5 and 0.6, with 30 times solar metallicity for the latter, with the presence or absence of TiO irrelevant to the shape of the spectrum, due to the low temperature of the planet) models are poor fits to the data. The non- inverted Burrows model (κabs = 0, Pn = 0.3) appears close to the 3σ eclipse depth upper limits, consistent with a lack of temperature inversion. The non-detections of thermal emission at both Spitzer channels, may suggest that heat is relatively efficiently redistributed to the night side of HAT-P-12b and/or that the albedo is high. However, it is difficult to claim this with any certainty, given the poor match that the models provide for the HAT-P-12b measurements. For this planet, Tirr = 1350 K, but its surface gravity is ∼ 5.7 m s−2, significantly less than the value of 10 m s−2, as- sumed for "typical" hot Jupiters by Perna et al. (2012). For these two reasons, we do not consider the possible high heat redistribution efficiency of HAT-P-12b to be evidence in favor of the Perna et al. (2012) hypothesis. The non-detection of thermal flux from HAT-P-12b 8 Todorov et al. is intriguing since neither the Burrows nor the Fortney models can account well for this. Searching the litera- ture, we find two other cool low-mass planets observed with Spitzer at 3.6 and 4.5 µm -- GJ 436b (Butler et al. 2004; Gillon et al. 2007b; Stevenson et al. 2010) and WASP-29b (Hardin et al. 2012). GJ 436b, WASP-29b and HAT-P-12b are the three coolest planets observed during secondary eclipse with Spitzer. They have equi- librium temperatures of ∼ 600 K, ∼ 980 and ∼ 950 K, re- spectively, assuming complete redistribution of the stel- lar flux to the night side and zero albedo. Assuming no flux redistribution and zero albedo, the average equi- librium temperatures of their day sides are ∼ 700 K, ∼ 1110 K and ∼ 1120 K, respectively. For these calcula- tions, we assume that the planets are always at a distance of 1 semi-major axis away from their host stars, which is relevant for GJ 436b, since it has non-zero eccentricity, e = 0.16. GJ 436b orbits an M2.5 V star with effective temperature, Teff = 3350 ± 300 K (Maness et al. 2007), and [M/H] = −0.32 ± 0.12 (Bean et al. 2006). The HAT- P-12b and WASP-29b host stars are larger -- K4 dwarfs with Teff = 4650 ± 60 K, and 4800 ± 150 K, respectively. The metallicity of HAT-P-12 is almost identical to that of GJ 436: [Fe/H]= −0.29 ± 0.05, but for WASP-29, [Fe/H]= 0.11 ± 0.014 (Hartman et al. 2009; Hellier et al. 2010). WASP-29b, like HAT-P-12b has a mass similar to Saturn's, while GJ 436b is a hot Neptune. WASP-29b and GJ 436b exhibit a measurable eclipse depth at 3.6 µm, while none is detected at 4.5 µm. This, in combination with Spitzer secondary eclipse measure- ments for GJ 436b at 5.8, 8.0, 16 and 24 µm, prompts Stevenson et al. (2010) to suggest that the planet has a non-inverted atmosphere with large concentrations of CO at the expense of CH4. They argue that the small eclipse depth at 4.5 µm is a result of a strong absorption feature of CO, while the strong 3.6 µm eclipse is caused by lack of CH4 absorption. CH4 is expected to begin to domi- nate as a carbon bearing molecule below temperatures of about 1100 K (for pressures of 1 bar and solar metallic- ity) (Lodders & Fegley 2002; Fortney et al. 2008), and so the suggested abundance of CO would require ther- mochemical disequilibrium in the GJ 436b's atmosphere. Hardin et al. (2012) suggest that a similar explanation is possible for WASP-29b. Despite their similar host stars, irradiation levels, plan- etary masses and planetary equilibrium temperatures, HAT-P-12b exhibits a completely different behavior from WASP-29b, since it produces prominent eclipses at nei- ther 3.6, nor 4.5 µm. The reasons for this disparity are unclear and additional atmospheric modeling and exten- sive observations are needed to investigate the atmo- spheres of planets with temperatures . 1000 K, which appear to be very dissimilar to those of traditional hot Jupiters. 4.4. Orbital Eccentricity Constraints The measured time of secondary eclipse can be used to constrain the orbital eccentricity, e, as part of the quantity e cos ω, where ω is the argument of periastron. For a detailed discussion, see, e.g., Charbonneau et al. (2005). For HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b, we average the timed eclipse central phases, weighing them by the in- verse of their variance and derive central phases of 0.50292 ± 0.00076 (HAT-P-3b) and 0.49951 ± 0.00070 (HAT-P-4b). The individual timings for HAT-P-4b agree within 0.1 σ, but the ones for HAT-P-3b disagree at the 2.8 σ level. We suggest that this discrepancy may be due to residual red noise, potentially due to stellar activity artifacts in the light curves for this planet that has not been taken into account by our data analysis procedures. Even for a circular orbit, or for an argument of peri- astron of 0/180◦, the central phase of the eclipse is not expected to be exactly 0.5. The light travel time de- lay is 19 s, 22 s and 19 s, corresponding to to expected central phases of 0.50008, 0.50008 and 0.50007 for HAT- P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, respectively. Another source of apparent delay could be an off-centered hottest point on the planet's face, closer to the trailing side of the planet than to its leading limb (e.g., Charbonneau et al. 2005; Cooper & Showman 2005; Knutson et al. 2007; Agol et al. 2010). Orbital perturbations due to previ- ously undetected planets can cause the secondary eclipse to occur earlier or later than expected. Our timing pre- cision is not sufficient to detect any of these effects. Taking the light travel time delay into account, and following the discussion in Charbonneau et al. (2005), we find that for HAT-P-3b, e cos ω < 0.0081 within 3σ. Similarly, within 3σ, e cos ω < 0.0042 for HAT- P-4b. These values are consistent with the value of e = 0 adopted by the discovery studies (Torres et al. 2007; Kov´acs et al. 2007) for all three planets. Since we do not detect the eclipses of HAT-P-12b, we cannot con- strain its eccentricity. 5. CONCLUSION We measure secondary eclipse depths in the 3.6 and 4.5 µm bands of Warm Spitzer for three exoplanets, HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b. We find that HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b have inefficient heat transfer from their day to night sides, but the models we compare to the data are ambiguous with respect to possible tem- perature inversions in their atmospheres. We detect the eclipses of HAT-P-12b neither at 4.5 µm, nor at 3.6 µm. This result is in contrast with Spitzer eclipse measure- ments of hot Neptune GJ 436b by Stevenson et al. (2010) and hot Saturn WASP-29b by (Hardin et al. 2012), two planets in the same temperature regime as HAT-P-12b. This is a confirmation that current models need further development to explain observations of planets with ef- fective temperatures below 1200 K. Additional infra-red secondary eclipse observations of "warm Jupiters" are urgently needed to constrain these models. Even non- detections, as in this study, combined with accurate es- timates of the e cos ω quantity would be invaluable in assessing the plausibility of atmospheric models. Cur- rently, the Spitzer Space Telescope remains the best avail- able observatory to perform these studies. In addition, we find that the eccentricities of HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b are consistent with zero. This is in agree- ment with previously published radial velocity measure- ments. We compile transit timing measurements from the literature and improve the ephemeris of HAT-P-12b. We see no obvious transit timing variations that could indicate additional objects in the HAT-P-12b system. Future eclipse depth observations will benefit from the experience that the community has gained from the study of exoplanets with the Warm Spitzer mission. The pointing oscillation observed for long time series ob- Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 9 servations with IRAC has been a problem because it causes apparent brightness changes of the target stars due to intrapixel response variations (the pixel-phase ef- fect). This effect has been mitigated, for observations after October 17, 2010, by adjusting the operation of a heater designed to keep a battery within its operat- ing temperature range. Both the amplitude and the pe- riod of the pointing wobble have been reduced, resulting in smaller brightness changes over shorter periods (from ∼ 60 min to ∼ 40 min), making them more distinguish- able from astrophysical phenomena like exoplanet tran- sits and eclipses. As a result, the removal of the point- ing oscillation effect can be done more efficiently and precisely18. In December 2011, improved pointing using the Pointing Calibration and Reference Sensor (PCRS) was added to the warm-mission IRAC time series photo- metric observations. This option was available and fre- quently used during the cryogenic mission and, when it is possible to utilize it, can be expected to help reduce the pixel-phase effect for staring observations of point sources longer than ∼ 12 hours19. These improvements increase the value of the observatory as one of the best currently available tools to study exoplanet atmospheres. We thank Jonathan Fraine for helpful discussions on "prayer bead" uncertainty estimation. This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Tele- scope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Labo- ratory, California Institute of Technology under a con- tract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech. 18 http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/warmmission/news/21oct2010memo.pdf 19 http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/docs/irac/pcrs obs.shtml REFERENCES Agol, E., Cowan, N. B., Knutson, H. A., Deming, D., Steffen, J. H., Henry, G. W., & Charbonneau, D. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1861 Anderson, D. R., Smith, A. M. S., Lanotte, A. A., et al. 2011, Ballard, S., Charbonneau, D., Deming, D., et al. 2010, PASP, MNRAS, 416, 2108 122, 1341 Bean, J. L., Benedict, G. F., & Endl, M. 2006, ApJ, 653, L65 Beerer, I. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 23 Burrows, A., & Sharp, C. M. 1999, ApJ, 512, 843 Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2007, ApJ, 668, L171 Burrows, A., Budaj, J., & Hubeny, I. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1436 Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 580 Campo, C. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 125 Chan, T., Ingemyr, M., Winn, J. N., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 179 Charbonneau, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 523 Charbonneau, D., Knutson, H. A., Barman, T., Allen, L. E., Mayor, M., Megeath, S. T., Queloz, D., & Udry, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1341 Christiansen, J. L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 97 Cochran, W. D., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 7 Cooper, C. S. & Showman, A. P. 2005, ApJ, 629, L45 Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. 2010, in Exoplanets, ed. S. Seager, (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 239 Cowan, N. B., & Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 729, 54 Cowan, N. B., Machalek, P., Croll, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 82 Deming, D., Seager, S., Richardson, & L. J., Harrington, J. 2005, Nature, 434, 740 197, 11 Eastman, J., Siverd, R. & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935 Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10 Ford, E. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 1706 Ford, E. B. 2006, ApJ, 642, 505 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., Saumon, D., & Freedman, R. S. 2005, ApJ, 627, L69 Fortney, J. J., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., & Freedman, R. S. 2006a, ApJ, 642, 495 Fortney, J. J., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 652, 746 Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1419 Fressin, F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 374 Gillon, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 471, L51 Gillon, M., Pont, F., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, L13 Grillmair, C. J., et al. 2008, Nature, 456, 767 Hardin, M., Harrington, J., Stevenson, K., et al. 2012, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 44, #200.09 Harrington, J., Luszcz, S., Seager, S., Deming, D., & Richardson, L. J. 2007, Nature, 447, 691 Deming, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 95 Demory, B.-O., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A114 D´esert, J.-M., Charbonneau, D., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2011, ApJS, submitted Zahnle, K., Marley, M. S., Freedman, R. S., Lodders, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2009, ApJ, 701, L20 Hartman, J. D., Bakos, G. ´A., Torres, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, Hellier, C., Anderson, D. R., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2010, 785 ApJ, 723, L60 Hubeny, I., Burrows, A., & Sudarsky, D. 2003, ApJ, 594, 1011 Knutson, H. A, et al. 2007, Nature, 447, 183 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., Burrows, A., & Megeath, S. T. 2008, ApJ, 673, 526 Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Burrows, A., O'Donovan, F. T., & Mandushev, G. 2009, ApJ, 691, 866 Knutson, H. A., Howard, A. W., & Isaacson, H. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1569 Knutson, H. A., Lewis, N., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 22 Kov´acs, G., Bakos, G. ´A., Torres, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, L41 Kurucz, R. L. 1979, ApJS, 40, 1 Lee, J. W., Youn, J.-H., Kim, S.-L., Lee, C.-U., & Hinse, T. C. Lewis, N. K., Knutson, H. A., Showman, A. P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 2012, AJ, 143, 95 766, 95 Lodders, K., & Fegley, B. 2002, Icarus, 155, 393 Machalek, P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1427 Machalek, P., McCullough, P. R., Burrows, A., Burke, C. J., Hora, J. L., & Johns-Krull, C. M. 2009, ApJ, 701, 514 Maness, H. L., Marcy, G. W., Ford, E. B., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, Mighell, K. J. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 861 Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763 Parmentier, V., Showman, A. P., & Lian, Y. 2013, A&A, Perna, R., Heng, K., & Pont, F. 2012, ApJ, 751, 59 Sada, P. V., Deming, D., Jennings, D. E., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 90 212 Sharp, C. M., & Burrows, A. 2007, ApJS, 168, 140 Southworth, J. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2166 Spiegel, D. S., Silverio, K. & Burrows, A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1487 Stevenson, K. B., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 1161 Stevenson, K. B., Harrington, J., Fortney, J. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, Todorov, K. O., Deming, D., Harrington, J., Stevenson, K. B., Bowman, W. C., Nymeyer, S., Fortney, J. J., & Bakos, G. A. 2010, ApJ, 708, 498 Todorov, K. O., Deming, D., Knutson, H. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, Torres, G., Bakos, G. ´A., Kov´acs, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, L121 Wright, J. T., Fakhouri, O., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2011, PASP, 754, 136 746, 111 123, 412 10 Todorov et al. Adopted Stellar and Planetary Parameters TABLE 1 M⋆ (M⊙) R⋆ (R⊙) Ks (mag)a Teff (K) bimpact Mp (MJ) Rp (RJ) P (days)b ap (AU)c HAT-P-3bd HAT-P-4be HAT-P-12bg 0.917 ± 0.030 0.799 ± 0.039 9.448 ± 0.025 5185 ± 80 0.530 ± 0.075 0.591 ± 0.018 0.827 ± 0.055 2.8997382 ± 0.0000009 0.03866 ± 0.00042 1.271+0.120 −0.070 1.600+0.117 −0.042 9.770 ± 0.020 5990f 0.084+0.014 −0.026 0.680+0.038 −0.025 1.337+0.079 −0.036 3.0565254 ± 0.0000012 0.04465 ± 0.00111 0.733 ± 0.018 0.701+0.017 −0.012 10.108 ± 0.016 4650f 0.211 ± 0.012 0.211+0.066 −0.078 0.959+0.029 −0.021 3.21305929 ± 0.00000034 0.03842 ± 0.00031 a Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) Ks magnitude of the star. b The HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b orbital periods are taken Sada et al. (2012); the HAT-P-12b period is derived from our updated ephemerides shown in Table 4 and Figure 2. c Calculated from the stellar masses and orbital periods assumed in this table. d Values from Chan et al. (2011), except for the magnitude, Ks, the period, P, and the semimajor axis. e Values from Southworth (2011), except for the magnitude, Ks, the effective temperature, Teff , the period, P, and the semimajor axis. f Knutson et al. (2010). g Values from Hartman et al. (2009), except for the magnitude, Ks, the effective temperature, Teff , the period, P, and the semimajor axis. TABLE 2 Photometry Parameters HAT-P-3b HAT-P-4b HAT-P-12b 3.6 µm 4.5 µm 3.6 µm 4.5 µm 3.6 µm 4.5 µm 2.5 3.5 0.40 1.30 2.21 2.33 2.16 3.0 6.5 0.30 1.60 2.33 2.39 2.25 4.0 4.0 0.85 0.35 2.24 2.47 2.09 3.0 6.5 0.50 1.05 2.55 2.64 2.41 5.0 6.0 0.95 1.05 3.10 3.24 2.96 2.5 6.5 0.50 1.10 2.46 2.58 2.37 rfix (pixels)a RI (pixels)b b c c (pixels) c median rvar maximum rvar d minimum rvar d d a Radius adopted for fixed aperture photometry. b Radius adopted for calculating the stellar intensity for Equation 1. c Variable aperture photometry parameters adopted, see Equation 1. d Median, maximum and minimum variable aperture radius. TABLE 3 Observation Details HAT-P-3b HAT-P-4b HAT-P-12b 3.6 µm 4.5 µm 3.6 µm 4.5 µm 3.6 µm 4.5 µm Observation start (UTC) Observation end (UTC) Orbital phase coverage Image count 17-03-2010,02:45 17-03-2010,10:28 0.433 -- 0.544 13,760 20-03-2010,00:04 20-03-2010,07:46 0.428 -- 0.539 13,760 12-04-2010,02:21 12-04-2010,09:59 0.439 -- 0.543 3,871 02-09-2010,18:49 03-09-2010,02:27 0.448 -- 0.552 3,871 16-03-2010,13:58 16-03-2010,21:35 0.445 -- 0.544 2,097 26-03-2010,05:09 26-03-2010,12:47 0.443 - 0.542 2,097 Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 11 N Observation Date Primary Transit (BJDTT) Uncertainty TABLE 4 HAT-P-12b Ephemerides 0 9 212 221 238 242 242 248 350 361 449 454 454 455 458 460 463 464 469 472 2007 Mar 28 2007 Apr 26 2009 Feb 06 2009 Mar 07 2009 May 01 2009 May 13 2009 May 13 2009 Jun 02 2010 Apr 25 2010 May 31 2011 Mar 10 2011 Mar 26 2011 Mar 26 2011 Mar 29 2011 Apr 07 2011 Apr 14 2011 Apr 23 2011 Apr 27 2011 May 13 2011 May 22 2454187.85655 2454216.77265 2454869.02397 2454897.94225 2454952.56398 2454965.41639 2454965.41748 2454984.69368 2455312.42673 2455347.76929 2455630.51896 2455646.58477 2455646.58486 2455649.79769 2455659.43563 2455665.86234 2455675.49947 2455678.71445 2455694.78089 2455704.42185 These 20 transits yield: P = 3.21305929 ± 0.00000034 days T0 = 2454187.85559 ± 0.00011 in BJDTT 0.00020 0.00014 0.00017 0.00024 0.00080 0.00046 0.00090 0.00060 0.00032 0.00021 0.00049 0.00059 0.00040 0.00020 0.00038 0.00031 0.00064 0.00045 0.00024 0.00038 Notes Hartman et al. (2009) Hartman et al. (2009) Hartman et al. (2009) Hartman et al. (2009) ETD ETD ETD ETD ETD Sada et al. (2012) ETD ETD ETD Lee et al. (2012) ETD Lee et al. (2012) ETD Sada et al. (2012) Lee et al. (2012) ETD Note: ETD transits were taken from the Exoplanet Transit Database, http://var2.astro.cz/ETD/ and compiled by Lee et al. (2012). For observations after 31 Dec 2008 and before 30 June 2012, TT ≈ UTC+66.184 s, while for the two 2007 transits TT ≈ UTC+65.184 s. TABLE 5 Secondary Eclipse Results Eclipse Depth (%) Brightness Temperature (K)a Eclipse Central Phase BJDTT b − 2 450 000 O − Cc (min) HAT-P-3b, 3.6 µm HAT-P-3b, 4.5 µm HAT-P-4b, 3.6 µm HAT-P-4b, 4.5 µm 0.112+0.015 −0.030 0.094+0.016 −0.009 0.142+0.014 −0.016 0.122+0.012 −0.014 HAT-P-12b, 3.6 µm < 0.042 HAT-P-12b, 4.5 µm < 0.085 1575+75 −162 1268+77 −45 2194+98 −116 1819+83 −100 < 970 < 980 0.50515+0.00092 −0.00110 5272.82936+0.00264 −0.00316 0.50084+0.00106 −0.00071 5275.71660+0.00304 −0.00203 0.49945+0.00091 −0.00081 5298.78653+0.00275 −0.00245 0.49960+0.00110 −0.00102 5442.44368+0.00333 −0.00309 · · · · · · · · · · · · 21.2+3.8 −4.6 3.2+4.4 −3.0 −2.8+4.0 −3.5 −2.1+4.8 −4.5 · · · · · · a The uncertainty of the brightness temperature included here only takes into account the uncertainty of the eclipse depths, but not the uncertainties in the stellar properties and the planetary radius. b Time of secondary eclipse central phase, in Barycentric Julian Date (BJD) based on Terrestrial Time (TT). For these observations, TT ≈ UTC + 66.184 s, where UTC is the Universal Coordinated Time. c The measured offset from the expected central phase of 0.50008 (HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-4b), with an adjustment for light travel time, (see Section 3.1), in minutes. 12 Todorov et al. Fig. 1. -- The uncorrected time series photometry for HAT-P-3, HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12 at 3.6 and 4.5 µm during secondary eclipse (dots), with the best fit eclipse model we obtain (red lines). These models include the astrophysical eclipse, and the instrumental effects: a linear ramp and the dependence of the measured intensity on the x and y-position of the stellar image on the detector. All photometric points are shown here, including the initial 49min of HAT-P-3 photometry, which we later reject. The best fit models only cover data that we have adopted for the fits. We discuss the data models in detail in Section 3.2. The HAT-P-12 photometry is shown on a smaller scale, since these data have the longest exposure time, and therefore the highest signal to noise per point. We do not detect the secondary eclipses of HAT-P-12b, and in these panels their depths are set to zero. Fig. 2. -- The difference between the best fit transit times and the observed transit times for HAT-P-12b. The black symbols represent transit timings from the discovery paper for this planet (Hartman et al. 2009). Also included are timings from the Exoplanet Transit Database (ETD, http://var2.astro.cz/ETD/) compiled by Lee et al. (2012) (red symbols), and the measurements made by Lee et al. (2012) (blue) and Sada et al. (2012) (green). The horizontal axis shows the number of periods after the T0 transit. We do not see any obvious correlation in the residuals that may suggest a transit timing variation, and hence the presence of an additional companion in the system. On the other hand, the number of outliers on this plot may imply that the timing uncertainties in some of these studies are underestimated. Warm Spitzer Photometry of Transiting Hot Jupiters HAT-P-4b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b 13 Fig. 3. -- The binned time series photometry for HAT-P-3, HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12 at 3.6 and 4.5 µm during secondary eclipse after correction for instrumental effects (dots). The bin width is 0.0015 in units of orbital phase, corresponding to about 6 min 16 sec (HAP-P-3b), 6 min 36 sec (HAT-P-4b) and 6 min 56 sec (HAT-P-12b). The red lines represent the best fit eclipse model. The best fit coefficients were used to correct all data for instrumental effects, but we have only fitted to the data covered by the eclipse model. The HAT-P-12b eclipse depths have been set to zero in this plot. Fig. 4. -- We show the histograms of eclipse depth values that result from the prayer-bead technique (black) and the MCMC iterations (red). The vertical solid lines indicate the best values from the PBMC (black), MCMC (red) and linear regression (blue), which we take to be the median of the eclipse depth values of the prayer-bead and MCMC runs. The dashed lines bracket the regions centered on the medians that contain 68% of the recorded values for prayer-bead (black) and MCMC (red). Since MCMC and PBMC address different noise effects, we adopt as final best values and uncertainties the results from the technique which yields the larger uncertainty region. For HAT-P-12, since there is no secondary eclipse detected, the MCMC does not converge, and the prayer-bead is performed with the central phase fixed at 0.50007. The blue dashed lines indicate the 1σ estimates, based on the linear regression used to determine the eclipse depth in the original data sets. We conservatively adopt these as final best values since they are larger than the prayer-bead uncertainties. 14 Todorov et al. Fig. 5. -- The measured eclipse amplitudes as a function of wavelengths (filled circles) compared to different atmospheric models: a blackbody planet with a Kurucz model for the spectrum of the star (black lines Kurucz 1979), Burrows planetary atmospheric models (left panels, Burrows et al. 2007, 2008), and similar atmospheric models by Fortney et al. (right panels, 2005, 2006a,b, 2008). The downward arrows represent 3σ upper limits for the HAT-P-12b eclipse depths. We have assumed effective stellar temperatures for HAT-P-3 from Chan et al. (2011) and from Knutson et al. (2010) for HAT-P-4 and HAT-P-12. Left panels: The red lines represent the inverted models, with absorption coefficient of the unknown absorber in the upper atmosphere κabs = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.1 cm2 g−1 and heat redistribution parameter Pn = 0.1, 0.1, and 0.3 for HAT-P-3b, HAT-P-4b and HAT-P-12b, respectively. The blue lines are models with no inversion (κabs = 0 cm2 g−1) and Pn = 0.3 for all three planets. We over-plot the theoretical eclipse depths resulting from integrating the model stellar and planetary fluxes over the IRAC pass-bands (diamonds for the inverted models and triangles for the inverted ones). Right panels: In the Fortney model paradigm, where the stratospheric absorbers are assumed to be TiO and VO, HAT-P-3b and HAT-P-12b are sufficiently cool, so that the inverted and non-inverted (i.e., containing or not TiO and VO in the upper layers of the atmosphere) models are indistinguishable, due to TiO and VO condensation and rain-out. For HAT-P-3b, we show models with f = 0.6 (red line) and f = 0.25 (blue line); for HAT-P-4b, both models shown have f = 0.5, but the red model has TiO in the upper layers of the atmosphere, while the blue one does not. For HAT-P-12b, the red line represents a model with f = 0.6, while the blue line shows a model with f = 0.5. All Fortney model atmospheres have solar composition, except the red model for HAT-P-12, which has metallicity 30 times higher than solar. For a more detailed explanation on the models see Section 4.1.
1802.03664	1	1802	2018-02-10T23:17:04	The role of breccia lenses in regolith generation from the formation of small, simple craters: Application to the Apollo 15 landing site	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Impact cratering is likely a primary agent of regolith generation on airless bodies. Regolith production via impact cratering has long been a key topic of study since the Apollo era. The evolution of regolith due to impact cratering, however, is not well understood. A better formulation is needed to help quantify the formation mechanism and timescale of regolith evolution. Here, we propose an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith generated by small, simple craters. We account for ejecta blanketing as well as regolith infilling of the transient crater cavity. Our results show that the regolith infilling plays a key role in producing regolith. Our model demonstrates that, because of the stochastic nature of impact cratering, the regolith thickness varies laterally, which is consistent with earlier work. We apply this analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 site. The regolith thickness is computed considering the observed crater size-frequency distribution of small, simple lunar craters (< 381 m in radius for ejecta blanketing and < 100 m in radius for the regolith infilling). Allowing for some amount of regolith coming from the outside of the area, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment. Finally, we find that the timescale of regolith growth is longer than that of crater equilibrium, implying that even if crater equilibrium is observed on a cratered surface, it is likely the regolith thickness is still evolving due to additional impact craters.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. The role of breccia lenses in regolith generation from the formation of small, simple craters: Application to the Apollo 15 landing site M. Hirabayashi1, B. A. Howl2, C. I. Fassett3, J. M. Soderblom4, D. A. Minton2, and H. J. Melosh2. 1Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A. 2Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A. 3NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35805, U.S.A. 4Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. Corresponding author: Masatoshi Hirabayashi ([email protected]) Key Points: • We develop an analytical expression of regolith generation by small, simple craters. • This model describes well the statistics of regolith formation, time evolution, and regolith growth. • Our method also provides consistent results with empirical observations of regolith at the Apollo 15 landing site. 1 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Abstract Impact cratering is likely a primary agent of regolith generation on airless bodies. Regolith production via impact cratering has long been a key topic of study since the Apollo era. The evolution of regolith due to impact cratering, however, is not well understood. A better formulation is needed to help quantify the formation mechanism and timescale of regolith evolution. Here, we propose an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith generated by small, simple craters. We account for ejecta blanketing as well as regolith infilling of the transient crater cavity. Our results show that the regolith infilling plays a key role in producing regolith. Our model demonstrates that, because of the stochastic nature of impact cratering, the regolith thickness varies laterally, which is consistent with earlier work. We apply this analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 site. The regolith thickness is computed considering the observed crater size-frequency distribution of small, simple lunar craters (< 381 m in radius for ejecta blanketing and < 100 m in radius for the regolith infilling). Allowing for some amount of regolith coming from the outside of the area, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment. Finally, we find that the timescale of regolith growth is longer than that of crater equilibrium, implying that even if crater equilibrium is observed on a cratered surface, it is likely the regolith thickness is still evolving due to additional impact craters. Plain Language Summary Impact cratering likely generates much of the regolith (the surface layer made up of a mixture of rocks, rock fragments, sand, and dust) observed on airless planetary surfaces. However, the way that the regolith layer evolves and thickens over time due to impact cratering events is not well understood. When a small, simple crater forms into hard rock, regolith is produced by fracturing the target rock and is deposited in the crater's ejecta blanket and within its transient crater cavity. Here, we discuss an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith developed by simple craters. Our results indicate that the regolith deposited on crater interiors is particularly important to consider when describing the distribution of regolith. Our model also indicates that the regolith thickness varies from one location to others. We apply this model to the regolith at the Apollo 15 landing site by considering the size distribution of observed small, simple lunar craters. Allowing for some regolith coming from outside of the area of the landing site, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment. Key words: Impact cratering, regolith Index terms: 5420 Impact phenomena, cratering 5470 Surface materials and properties 6250 Moon 2 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. 1 Introduction Since Shoemaker et al. [1967] first used the term 'regolith' to describe fragmented, low- cohesive units on the lunar surface, the formation of regolith has widely been recognized as a fundamental surface process on terrestrial bodies. On the Moon, while volcanic ash and beads [Heiken et al., 1991] and thermal fatigue processes [Delbo et al., 2014; Molaro et al., 2015] may contribute to regolith growth, impact cratering has likely been the primary mechanism for regolith growth [Shoemaker et al., 1969]. Observational studies have provided estimates of the thickness of lunar regolith. Using Lunar Orbiter 1 and Surveyor 1 photographs, Oberbeck and Quaide [1967] and Quaide and Oberbeck [1968] analyzed the crater morphologies and determined the regolith thickness on the Moon as 5–10 m. Active seismic experiments during the Apollo missions 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 showed that the regolith thickness at the landing sites was on the order of meters [Nakamura et al., 1975]. With 70-cm Arecibo radar data, Fa and Wieczorek [2012] measured the dielectric constant of the lunar surface and obtained that the median value of the regolith thickness ranged from 2.6 to 12.0 m, depending on geological terrain. Wilcox et al. [2005] estimated a regolith thickness of 8–30 m by analyzing Lunar Orbiter high-resolution images and Clementine multispectral images. Also, studies using Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera images revealed that the median regolith thickness in mare regions (~ 2 to 3 m) is shallower than that in highland regions (~ 5 to 8 m) [Bart et al., 2011; Fa et al., 2014]. Furthermore, lunar penetrating radar observations by the Chang'E mission revealed a layered structure at the rim of Chang'E crater located in Mare Imbrium: a reworked zone (< 1 m), an ejecta layer (~2 – 6 m), and a paleoregolith layer (~ 4 – 11 m) [Fa et al., 2015]. Detailed modeling can provide a better understanding of regolith formation due to impact cratering. It is necessary to consider how the formation process of regolith is related to impact cratering processes and how cratering breaks down bedrock into regolith. When a small, simple crater forms into hard rock, regolith is produced by fragmentation of the target, and regolith is deposited in the crater's ejecta blanket and within its transient crater cavity [Shoemaker et al., 1967]. The regolith unit within the crater cavity, i.e., the breccia lens, is developed during the excavation stage, during which time a bowl-shaped transient crater gravitationally collapses, followed by a process that loose materials move down on the steep wall of the transient crater [Melosh, 1989] and change in volume via dilatancy [Collins, 2014]. The condition of a cratered surface is usually compared to analyze the formation of regolith. We introduce a concept for a cratered surface that is heavily bombarded. As an example, we consider a hypothetical planetary surface that is initially intact. When this surface is constantly affected by impact cratering events, all the craters are initially visible. However, as the number of craters increases on the surface, some craters start to be degraded. Eventually, some crater sizes reach a situation that the total number of erased craters is equal to that of newly created craters. We call this condition crater equilibrium [Melosh, 1989]. Studies attempted to quantify regolith growth due to multiple impact events. Shoemaker et al. [1969] considered crater equilibrium to roughly estimate the thickness of regolith. Monte Carlo analyses have been a popular tool for simulating the evolution of regolith. Considering that the amount of regolith might change due to the condition of a target surface [Quaide and Oberbeck, 1968], Oberbeck et al. [1973] developed a Monte Carlo model to analyze how regolith grows in response to impact cratering. We note that while many sophisticated Monte Carlo techniques have 3 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. recently been developed for different purposes, the Cratered Terrain Evolution Model (CTEM) is another Monte Carlo code that has provided strong insights into the regolith evolution on the Moon [Richardson, 2009; Minton et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2017]. The purpose of this paper is to characterize the evolution of the regolith thickness analytically. Numerical Monte Carlo techniques allow for describing complex regolith generation processes but tend to become computationally expensive. Furthermore, many of them still include imperfect functions of how a cratered surface on an airless body evolves because additions of complex physics usually induce redundant model uncertainties. For this reason, analytical models are useful for exploring the fundamental mechanisms in a simple way. Importantly, the thicker the regolith thickness grows, the more difficult it is for new small, simple craters to generate new regolith. Eventually, craters with any sizes no longer contribute to the regolith evolution. In this paper, we compute the time evolution of the regolith thickness and compare it with the time evolution of crater equilibrium. We describe how we organize this paper. We first explain how to describe regolith units in a small, simple crater and how to compute the regolith thickness due to the formation of multiple craters. Next, we conduct comparison tests of our analytical model with the Monte Carlo simulation technique by Oberbeck et al. [1973] and with CTEM. Then, we apply this model to regolith formation at the Apollo 15 landing site. In this application, we consider that the crater size contributing to regolith generation by the formation of a breccia lens is different from that by ejecta blanketing. Some ejecta may be originated from large craters that are located far from the Apollo 15 site, while the formation of a breccia lens always results from a local process. Based on our crater counting, we consider that craters smaller than 100 m in radius affected regolith formation due to regolith infilling on the transient crater cavity, while those smaller than 381 m in radius did so by ejecta blanketing. For simplicity, however, we do not specify the minimum crater radius and simply assume that it is infinitely small, i.e., zero. Finally, using this application, we evaluate the timescale that the regolith thickness ceases to grow. 2 Modeling of regolith units as a source of regolith 2.1 Implementation of regolith units in a small, simple crater To account for regolith formation due to the formation of small, simple craters, we track regolith production by these impacts within the ejecta blanket and breccia lens (Figure 1). Newly formed craters are assumed to be circular. For simplicity, we do not distinguish the size distribution of regolith particles in between a breccia lens and that an ejecta blanket. This simplification ignores the condition of regolith such as the size to reduce model uncertainties. Below, we introduce the regolith thickness profiles in the regions outside and inside the crater. In the outside region, we consider an ejecta blanket to be the regolith unit. In the inside region, a breccia lens is a source of regolith. First, we discuss an ejecta blanket as a source of regolith. Earlier works showed the scaling law of the external crater profile as a function of distance from the crater rim [McGetchin et al., 1973; Pike, 1974; Fassett et al., 2011; Xie and Zhu, 2016]. We define the thickness profile of the ejecta blanket of a simple crater as [e.g., Pike, 1974; Sharpton, 2014] 4 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. ℎ"#$ ∼𝜎𝑟)𝑟𝑟)+,-, 𝑟>𝑟), (1) parameters. An observed height of an ejecta blanket may include the height of rim uplift and the thickness of ejecta. Therefore, it is necessary to find the part of the ejecta blanket correctly. In literature, the ejecta thickness at the rim is usually considered to be a half of the total rim height [Melosh, 1989]. However, recent works using high-resolution images revealed that for lunar craters and martian complex craters, the ejecta deposit, which is considered to be a part of the regolith unit in this study, might be much thinner than thought [Sharpton, 2014; Sturm et al., 2016]. where 𝑟) is the final crater radius, 𝑟 is the distance from the crater center, and 𝜎 and 𝜅 are empirical Particularly, Sharpton [2014] described a rim height of 0.068 𝑟)1.31 and argued that the thickness of the ejecta blanket of a simple crater can be given as 0.014 𝑟)1.31 (𝑟/𝑟)),:. We use his scaling relationship but assume 𝑟)1.31∼𝑟) for mathematical simplicity; 𝜎 and 𝜅 are given as 0.014 and 3. blanketing is up to 381 m (see the discussion below), the assumption of 𝑟)1.31∼𝑟) only changes Note that in this study, since the considered crater radius affecting regolith production due to ejecta less than 6% of the thickness of each ejecta blanket, which is considered to be small. Second, we add a model for creation and deposition of a breccia lens within a small, simple crater. A breccia lens forms in the area above the transient crater surface and beneath the final crater surface. We define the depth of the regolith unit within the breccia lens, using a parabolic profile, which is given as ℎ;<=>𝛿 𝑟) @1−𝑟B𝑟)BC, 𝑟≤𝑟) 0, 𝑟>𝑟), where 𝛿 is the depth parameter. Recent works using Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera calculate 𝛿 as 0.34 for the 0.13 depth-to-diameter ratio and that as 0.30 for the 0.15 depth-to- (LROC) images suggest that fresh small, simple craters have a low depth-to-diameter ratio [Stopar et al., 2017; Mahanti et al., 2018]. For example, the depth-to-diameter ratio is about 0.13 for fresh simple craters of 20 m – 50 m in radius and approximately 0.15 for those of 50 m – 100 m in radius [Stopar et al., 2017]. The transient crater's depth is 1/3 of its diameter, and the final crater's diameter is 1.25 times larger than the transient crater's diameter. Using these conditions, we (2) diameter ratio. 2.2 Analytical expressions of regolith formation In this section, we derive an analytical expression to describe the production of regolith from small, simple craters. Regolith units developed by such craters are described in Equations (1) and (2). A key factor in our modeling is to consider the regolith distribution of small, simple craters, accounting for the crater size distributions [Costello et al., 2017; Hirabayashi et al., 2017]. We introduce assumptions made in the present model. First, impacts randomly occur on an intact surface. Second, the target surface is assumed to be initially flat. Third, each small, simple crater only creates regolith units described by the profiles in Equations (1) and (2). Fourth, based on the third assumption, the target surface is not affected by other processes such as material melting or compaction. 5 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. We start our derivation by describing the fraction of a flat area covered by small, simple indices of the minimum crater radius and the maximum crater radius, respectively. We now considered this area fraction on the surface of the target region. Because craters have variable radii, craters in some region at a given depth, ℎ. We extend the work done by Gault et al. [1974], who we denote the radius of the 𝑖-sized crater as 𝑟); (𝑖F;<≤𝑖≤𝑖FGH), where 𝑖F;< and 𝑖FGH are the consider that the target region is affected by craters of a single size 𝑖. The area fraction at ℎ that is affected by one crater of size 𝑖 is given as where 𝑆; is the area at depth ℎ affected by a crater of radius 𝑟);, and 𝐴 is the total area of the target region. 𝑆; is a function of ℎ and 𝑟);, and so is 𝑃;. We omit (ℎ,𝑟);) to simplify the mathematical crater of size 𝑖 as [Gault et al., 1974] Allowing for a number, 𝑛;, of randomly emplaced craters of size 𝑖 in the same area 𝐴, we expressions in the following process. We obtain the area fraction that is not occupied by a single (4) (3) give the area fraction that is not occupied by any crater of this size as which for large 𝑛; is equivalent to To extend this empty area fraction to all crater sizes, we form the product of 𝑃L;<N for all 𝑖s and (5) (6) rewrite as a summation using the law of indices, which is given as 𝑃;(ℎ,𝑟);)=𝑆;(ℎ,𝑟);)𝐴 , 𝑃L;=1−𝑃;=1−𝑆;𝐴. 𝑃L;<N=1−𝑆;𝐴+<N, 𝑃L;<N=exp−𝑆;𝑛;𝐴+. = Sexp−𝑆;𝑛;𝐴+=expY−1𝐴 Z 𝑆;𝑛; ;TUV ;TUV ;W;TNX ;W;TNX [ . (7) 𝑃R= S 𝑃L;<N ;TUV ;W;TNX 𝑃=1−𝑃R, as Hence, we can express the area fraction that is occupied by at least one crater of any size, 6 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. 𝑃=1− expY−1𝐴 Z 𝑆;𝑛; ;TUV ;W;TNX [. (8) (9) (10) [Hirabayashi et al., 2017] 𝑛;=−𝑑𝐶$𝑑𝑟) 𝑑𝑟), 𝐶$=𝐴𝜉𝑋𝑟),', This quantity describes the area affected by any craters that have formed. Some new craters may occur in empty regions, while others may be in the areas that have already been affected by previously formed craters. This equation accounts for such crater overlapping (Figure 2). We then convert Equation (8) to a continuous form. To do so, we describe 𝑛; as where 𝐶$ is the cumulative size frequency distribution (CSFD), which is given as [Hirabayashi et where 𝑟) has units of m (i.e., meters), 𝜉, of which units are m',B, is a factor that describes the produced crater CSFD of craters with a radius of 1 m per area at present, 𝜂 is the power index of the slope, and 𝑋 is the non-dimensional produced crater number based on a constant impact flux. From these definitions, the produced crater CSFD is proportional to 𝑋. 𝐶$ at 𝑋=1 indicates the We denote a continuous form of 𝑆; as 𝑆. We also define the region affected by an ejecta blanket as 𝑆"#$ and that by a breccia lens as 𝑆;<. With these denotations, 𝑆 at given depth, ℎ, is given as 𝑆"#$+𝑆;< . For 𝑆"#$ at ℎ, we use Equation (1) to obtain 𝑆"#$=𝜋𝑟)Bℎ𝜎𝑟)+,B-−𝜋𝑟)B. In this form, we subtract 𝜋𝑟)B to remove the internal area of the crater. For 𝑆;< at ℎ, we use 𝑆;<=𝜋𝑟)B1− ℎ𝛿𝑟)+. produced crater CSFD at present. Equation (2) to obtain (11) (12) al., 2017] Under these conditions, we rewrite Equation (8) as 7 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. (13) 𝑃=1−expe1𝐴f gTUVNXhi 𝑑𝐶$𝑑𝑟)𝑆;<𝑑𝑟) +1𝐴f gTUVjkl hm 𝑑𝐶$𝑑𝑟)𝑆"#$𝑑𝑟) n, there. of the small crater. This location is also affected by the ejecta blanket of the large crater but not by the breccia lens of that crater. Therefore, to properly compute the regolith thickness, we should consider the ejecta blanket of the large craters and the breccia lens of the small crater. Extending these parameters because the crater size contributing to regolith production by regolith infilling on the transient crater cavity is different from that due to ejecta blanketing. We use Figure 3 to explain this case. Assume that there are two craters formed on a test area. The large crater is younger than the small crater. The light gray areas describe ejecta blankets, while the dark gray regions indicate where the minimum crater radius is characterized by ℎ. The minimum radius of the breccia lens at ℎ is ℎ/𝛿, and that of the ejecta blanket is given as ℎ/𝜎. For simplicity, we assume ℎ to range from zero to its maximum value; thus, this model accounts for infinitely small, simple craters, i.e., 𝑟)→ 0 m. 𝑟FGH;< is the maximum radius of craters whose breccia lens affects the regolith thickness, while 𝑟FGH"#$ is that of craters whose ejecta blanket contributes to regolith generation. We introduce breccia lenses. Now we want to compute the regolith thickness at 𝑃𝑛𝑡 in the breccia lens region this argument to a case of multiple craters, we find that 𝑟FGH;< is dependent on the distribution of craters at a selected point, while 𝑟FGH"#$ should be large because ejecta from large craters can reach Because of these expressions, 𝑃 is finally described as a function of ℎ. From Equations 𝑑𝐶$𝑑𝑟)𝑆;<𝑑𝑟) 𝑓;<=1𝐴f gTUVNXhi =𝜉𝑋𝜂𝜋𝜂−2s(𝑟FGH;< ),'tB−ℎ;<𝛿+,'tBu −𝜉𝑋𝜂𝜋𝜂−1ℎ;<𝛿+s(𝑟FGH;< ),'t1−ℎ;<𝛿+,'t1u, 𝑓"#$=1𝐴f 𝑑𝐶$𝑑𝑟)𝑆"#$𝑑𝑟) gTUVjkl hm =−𝜉𝑋𝜂𝜋𝜂−2s(𝑟FGH"#$),'tB−ℎ"#$𝜎 +,'tBu + 𝜉𝑋𝜂𝜋 𝜂−2−2𝜅ℎ"#$𝜎 +,B->(𝑟FGH"#$),'tBtB-−ℎ"#$𝜎 +,'tBtB-v (10), (11), and (12), we obtain the exponential terms in Equation (13) as (15) (14) where 8 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. ℎ;<=min(ℎ,𝛿𝑟FGH;< ), ℎ"#$=min(ℎ,𝜎𝑟FGH"#$). (16) Equation (13) describes the fraction of the area affected by at least one crater formation at ℎ to the total area. This area fraction indicates how much regolith is filled in the total area at ℎ. It also describes the total area whose thickness is thicker than ℎ. Using this area fraction to express the regolith thickness distribution, we can directly compare the results from our model with those from Oberbeck et al. [1973], who used this quantity (e.g., see Figures 1 and 3 in their paper). (17) While Equation (13) indicates the distribution of the regolith thickness, this equation does not give an explicit insight into the regolith thicknesses at sampling locations that would be restricted by many artificial factors such as safety for astronauts and accessibility. Instead, we can consider the expected regolith thickness at the sample locations in a statistical sense. We consider sampling locations randomly chosen from the region of the landing site. This process may be described by the expected value of a random variable in probability theory, which is given as ;TUV ;W;TNX ℎL=limzh→3 Z {𝑃ℎ;−𝛥ℎ2+−𝑃ℎ;+𝛥ℎ2+}ℎ; , 𝑑𝑃𝑑ℎℎ𝑑ℎ =−f , h(gTUV) h(gTNX) (18) where 𝛥ℎ is a small interval of the depth, 𝑖F;< and 𝑖FGH are the indices, and ℎ(𝑟F;<) and ℎ(𝑟FGH) define the regolith thicknesses created by craters with radii of 𝑟F;< and 𝑟FGH, respectively. Using the assumption above, we consider 𝑟F;< to be zero. 𝑟FGH can be replaced with either 𝑟FGH;< or 𝑟FGH"#$ . To distinguish the regolith thickness value given in Equation (18) with the regolith thickness distribution, we call it the expected regolith thickness. 3 Benchmark exercises of the analytical model 3.1 Comparison test with the Monte Carlo analysis done by Oberbeck et al. [1973] In this section, we compare the developed analytical model with the Monte Carlo simulation work done by Oberbeck et al. [1973]. Oberbeck and Quaide [1967] and Quaide and Oberbeck [1968] analyzed the crater topographic profiles to determine the regolith thickness, using observational and experimental data. Oberbeck et al. [1973] applied the analytical expressions of the regolith volume produced by crater formation [Quaide and Oberbeck, 1968] to explore the evolution of the regolith thickness. In their work, the total regolith volume was converted to the ejecta profile function, which corresponds to Equation (1). Here, we strictly follow their simulation settings. Oberbeck et al. [1973] considered a case with a produced crater CSFD of 1.0 ×10(cid:127) 𝐷,:.(cid:129) per km2 (Figure 1 in their paper), where 𝐷 is the crater diameter in their definition. From this function, 𝜉 and 𝜂 are defined as 0.95 and 3.4, respectively. given as 𝐶 in their work (see Equation (2) in Oberbeck et al. [1973]) and as 𝜎 in the present work. We first consider the coefficient of the regolith thickness that they considered, which is 9 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. is given as (19) (20) Equation (4) in Oberbeck et al. [1973]: 𝑉(2−𝜅) 2𝜋𝑟):(𝑞B,-−1). To characterize how the regolith thickness of the pre-impact surface affects the newly generated regolith volume, Oberbeck et al. [1973] defined four categories: (I) regolith crater, (II) a flat- bottomed crater, (III) a concentric crater, and (IV) a hard-rock crater. We compute the regolith volume of these groups, using Table 1 in Oberbeck et al. [1973] (see Table S1 in our supporting information). Then, we calculate 𝜎 for Oberbeck et al. [1973], which is denoted as 𝜎"(cid:130), by using 𝜎"(cid:130)= where 𝑉 is the regolith volume defined in Table 1 in Oberbeck et al. [1973], 𝑞=7, and 𝜅=3.7. Note that 𝜅 used in Equation (19) is equal to that in Equation (1). To compute 𝑉, we follow the parameters defined by Oberbeck et al. [1973] (Table S2). We find that 𝜎"(cid:130) is not strongly affected by the crater size and the crater floor size. Considering 𝜎"(cid:130) for all the cases (Table S3), we obtain the averaged value of 𝜎"(cid:130) as 0.15 (Text S1). Again, given 𝜅 as 3 and the rim height-to-radius ratio as 0.068, Sharpton [2014] proposed 𝜎=0.014, while 𝜎=0.034 in literature, which is the half of the rim height [e.g., Melosh, 1989]. Because Oberbeck et al. [1973] defined 𝜅 as 3.7, we need to fix the discrepancy of 𝜅 to compare these 𝜎s with 𝜎"(cid:130). Based on Equation (19), a formula to convert 𝜎 from one slope case to another where superscript ∗ gives the post-conversion case. Here, we convert 𝜎 from 𝜅=3 to 𝜅∗=3.7. We denote 𝜎=0.014 as Case 1 and 𝜎=0.034 as Case 2. Using Equation (20), we obtain 𝜎∗= 0.021 for Case 1 and 𝜎∗=0.051 for Case 2 (Table 1). For comparison, Table 1 also describes the ratios of the rim height to the crater radius. It is found that since 𝜎"(cid:130)=0.15, 𝜎∗=0.021 for Case 1 is 7.1 times smaller than 𝜎"(cid:130), and 𝜎∗=0.051 for Case 2 is 2.9 times smaller than 𝜎"(cid:130). This and blue lines describe the results from our analytical model with different 𝜎∗s. The blue line is 𝜎∗=0.021, while the red line is 𝜎∗=0.051. We find that a difference between these 𝜎∗s is Accounting for an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens as sources of regolith, we compare our analytical model with their Monte Carlo simulation. The defined parameters used for the analytical model are given in Table S4. Figure 4 shows the area fractions obtained by comparison between our analytical results and the Monte Carlo simulation results from Oberbeck et al. [1973]. The red (2−𝜅)(𝑞B,-−1) 𝜎∗=(2−𝜅∗) (𝑞B,-∗−1)𝜎, result shows that Oberbeck et al. [1973] overestimated the ejecta blanket volume. negligibly small and conclude that an ejecta blanket plays a minor role in producing regolith. On the other hand, the black dashed lines with gray-colored squares show the results from Oberbeck et al. [1973]. The lower black dashed line is the case when the minimum crater size is 94.8 m, and the upper one is the case when the minimum size is 9 m. This variation resulted from a resolution issue in their Monte Carlo model and was improved by considering a higher resolution [Oberbeck et al.,1973]. Thus, because the analytical model accounts for an infinitely small crater size, our results are expected to become closer to the upper black dashed line. However, they are 10 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. lower at a high area fraction and higher at a low area fraction than the upper black dashed line. This discrepancy results from the sources of regolith generation; while Oberbeck et al. [1973] only considered the ejecta volume, the present work accounts for the volume of an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens. This discrepancy is likely to change the distribution of regolith at given depth. Importantly, the expected regolith thickness of our model is 2.0 m, which corresponds to that of the upper dashed line obtained by Oberbeck et al. [1973]. While Oberbeck and Quaide [1967] and Quaide and Oberbeck [1968] analyzed the crater profiles to determine the regolith thickness, Oberbeck et al. [1973] assumed that regolith production was solely attributed to ejecta blanketing. We infer that Oberbeck et al. [1973] might overestimate the ejecta volume. 3.2 Comparison tests with Cratered Terrain Evolution Model Next, we compare the results from our analytical model with those from CTEM. We first describe the implementation of the profile of a breccia lens into CTEM. The original version of CTEM has a function that creates an ejecta blanket based on the ejecta volume and speed and the size of each newly formed crater [Richardson, 2009; Minton et al., 2015]. We use this function in this work to compute the ejecta blanket profile. We note that while Huang et al. [2017] incorporated crater ray patterns into CTEM to model distal ejecta, we treat ejecta emplacement to be uniform in our analytical model. We implement a new function that calculates the breccia lens profile (see Equation (2)), using a linked list algorithm first incorporated by Huang et al. [2017]. Since CTEM has an algorithm that computes a crater shape profile [Richardson, 2009; Minton et al., 2015], we merged a new shape profile of the transient crater into this algorithm. The ratio of the transient crater depth to the transient crater diameter is defined as 1/3. Also, we set the depth- to-diameter ratio in CTEM as 0.13, which leads to 𝛿=0.34. Figure 5 shows the regolith thickness after formation of a small, simple crater with a radius of 38.2 m. Figure 5a is the case when only an ejecta blanket is considered to be a source of regolith, while Figure 5b is the case when both an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens result in the formation of regolith. Equation (1) predicts an ejecta thickness of 0.53 m at the rim, while CTEM produces that of 0.48 m there (Figure 5a). This difference results from CTEM's ejecta generation function, which is not easily controllable. Because the error is 10 % of the ejecta thickness, we keep the original CTEM setting. Also, the regolith thickness pattern in Figure 5a comes from CTEM's periodic boundary condition [Richardson, 2009; Minton et al., 2015]. On the other hand, the regolith thickness in the breccia lens becomes 13 m at the crater center from Equation (2), and we produce the same regolith thickness in CTEM (Figure 5b). In CTEM, the regolith layer profiles are stored in the linked list and are updated when a new crater affects the originally existing bedrock layer. This function allows CTEM to compute realistic regolith generation. CTEM generates craters using multiple functions including a model impactor velocity distribution, a model impactor size distribution, and a crater scaling relationship. As a result of a scheme based on these functions, the produced crater CSFD is consistent with a lunar-based produced CSFD [Minton et al., 2015]. A surface area defined in CTEM is defined by 500 m by 500 m. In each simulation, craters are generated in the radius range between 2 m and 100 m. We compute 50 statistical cases with different random seeds. While the produced crater CSFD in each case is different, the mean produced crater CSFD of this statistical test is given using Equation (10) with 𝐴=25 ×10(cid:129) m2, 𝜉=0.80 m, 𝜂=3.0, and 𝑋=1.0. CTEN generated nearly 9000 craters in each case. 11 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Similar to the previous section, we use the area fraction to compare the results from our analytical model with those from CTEM (Figure 6). The gray lines indicate the results from CTEM, and the dashed black lines describe the means of these results. The solid black lines represent the results from the analytical model. The parameter setting of the analytical model is available in Table S5. Figure 6a is the produced crater CSFDs, and Figure 6b is the area fraction of regolith at given depth. The solution from the analytical model and the means of the results from CTEM are consistent. However, we note that in Figure 6b, the dashed black line shows a slightly smaller regolith area fraction at deep depth (> 3 m) than the solid black line. We discuss this discrepancy by considering the produced crater CSFD. As shown in Figure 6a, the produced crater CSFD for the analytical model (the solid black line) is higher than that for CTEM (the dashed black line) at large craters (> 30 m in radius). Because of this effect, the analytical model apparently predicts a slightly wider area fraction in a deep region than CTEM. We also observe a slight difference between our analytical model and CTEM in a shallow region. We infer that CTEM accounts for the topographic evolution of a cratered surface, but the analytical model does not. This model discrepancy gives an inconsistency of the area fraction at shallow depth in CTEM and the analytical model. 4 Applications of the analytical model to the Apollo 15 landing site This section applies the analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 landing site. This region, located at a boundary between highlands and mare, is considered to have experienced various processes that contributed to its unique geology (Figure 7). The main unit at the landing site is mare lava emplaced 3.3 Ga ago [Nyquist and Shih, 1992]. Aristillus and Autolycus, complex craters that formed after local emplacement of mare basalt inside Imbrium basin, are located 300 km away from the landing site [Bernatowicz and Hohenberg, 1978; Ryder et al., 1991]. This area is also surrounded by the Apennine Bench Formation, which is thought to have formed by either impact [Wilhelms, 1980; Mccauley et al., 1981] or volcanic activity [Spudis, 1978; Spudis and Ryder, 1985]. Here, we first conduct crater counting of the landing site to obtain the visible crater CSFD (Section 4.1). Next, comparing the results from the analytical model with the empirical data obtained in Section 4.1, we investigate the regolith thickness evolution at the Apollo 15 landing site (Section 4.2). Then, we explore if the regolith thickness further grows at this site by considering the timescale of the regolith thickness evolution (Section 4.3). 4.1 Counting craters We use the shaded relief map and the digital terrain model (DTM) for the Apollo 15 landing site (http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc/view_rdr/NAC_DTM_APOLLO15), derived from LROC Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) images M111571816L/R and M11578606L/R [Tran et al., 2010]. The DTM post spacing is 2.0 m. We consider a 4.7 km × 10.6 km region in the northern portion of the map (Figure 8). The Falcon lander is located in a southern portion of the full maps, so the currently considered area does not directly include the Apollo 15 site. Because our technique explicitly requires the crater density, we must measure the surface area. For this reason, we choose the northern region to avoid complex surface features such as Hadley Rille and Montes Apenninus (see Figure 7). Note that the crater conditions there, such as the size frequency distribution and freshness, are similar to those in the region around the Apollo 15 site. To count craters, we use publicly available remote sensing software, JMARS [Christensen et al., 2009]. To find craters, we search for their rim feature and circular depression. The shaded 12 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. relief and DTM maps enable us to identify topographic depression developed by impact cratering. Note that in our crater counting process, primary and secondary craters are not distinguished. Because some secondary craters may be morphologically indistinguishable from small primary craters [Wells et al., 2010], the counted craters presumably include some of these craters. We count craters with radii larger than 3.8 m (the empirical data is available in our supporting information). Figure 9 shows the visible crater CSFD of craters larger than 12 m in radius to avoid crater counting bias. The red-edged circles in this figure show our empirical result. We interpret the observed different slopes as two crater conditions. The steep slope is indicative of the produced crater CSFD, while the shallow slope describes crater equilibrium. Fitting the crater equilibrium model by Hirabayashi et al. [2017] to our empirical result, we determine the produced crater CSFD given in Equation (10) and the equilibrium slope, 𝐶)(cid:138), as respectively. Similar to Equation (10), the units of 𝑟) of these equations are meters. Since we consider that 𝑋=1 and 𝐴=49.8 km2, we obtain 𝜉=2.21 m1.2. Therefore, the produced crater CSFD per area is given as 2.21 𝑟),:.B m-2. These two fitting functions indicate that in this region, 𝐶$=1.1×10(cid:139) 𝑟),:.B, 𝐶)(cid:138)=1.2×10(cid:140) 𝑟),1.(cid:140), craters with radii less than 50 m are in crater equilibrium. The obtained results are consistent with the crater counting analysis by Robbins et al. [2014] and the crater equilibrium study by Hirabayashi et al. [2017]. (22) (21) 4.2 Regolith thickness at present Impact craters have dominated the landscape of the Apollo 15 landing site since the total reset by a mare lava flow, suggesting that they are the main control on the regolith thickness in the landing site region. As a consequence, the regolith thickness is an indicator of impact cratering events after this region was flooded with mare lava 3.3 Ga ago [Nyquist and Shih, 1992]. We compute the evolution of the regolith thickness at this landing site. We assume that the produced crater CSFD given in Equation (21) represents the local region around the lunar module. From a passive seismic experiment in the Apollo 15 mission, Nakamura et al. [1975] obtained the regolith thickness as 4.4 m. Before discussing our results, we introduce the values of 𝑟FGH;< and 𝑟FGH"#$ . We first determine 𝑟FGH;< . We choose an area within 100 m from the lunar module landing site to recover the passive crater cavity. Thus, we define 𝑟FGH;< as 100 m. Second, for 𝑟FGH"#$ , it is necessary to account for the we define 𝑟FGH"#$ as 381 m. site. While our model can account for ejecta from large craters by choosing a proper value of 𝑟FGH"#$ distribution of large craters. Here, we assume that 𝐶$ in Equation (21) does not account for the seismic experiment distance done by the Apollo 15 crews [Nakamura et al., 1975]. This area is surrounded by degraded craters of ~100 m in radius. Here, we consider that craters similar to or smaller than these craters might affect regolith formation due to regolith infilling on the transient distribution of large craters in a wide area around the landing site. In our counting, the largest crater is 381 m in radius. Therefore, to consider the effect of ejecta from all the observed craters, for their crater radii, we consider that our produced crater CSFD may not represent the global We note that there are several large craters whose ejecta might affect the Apollo 15 landing 13 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. large crater distribution; therefore, we separate the effect of these craters on regolith growth at the landing site from our analytical model. St. George crater, which is the largest crater (1000 m in radius) in the local area, is located 5 km from the landing site. Using the ejecta thickness relationship for a simple crater given by Sharpton [2014], we obtain the ejecta thicknesses from this crater as 0.12 m. Autolycus and Aristillus craters are located 177 km and 275 km from the Sharpton [2014], we obtain the ejecta thickness from Autolycus and Aristillus as 0.15 m and 0.23 m, respectively. If this is the case, 11% of the regolith thickness at the landing site, i.e., ~0.5 m, might result from these craters. The FeO content derived from Clementine imagery implies that the materials at the landing site might have been affected by exotic materials, but the influence was still limited [Lucey et al., 1995; Blewett et al., 1997]. landing site, respectively [Smith et al., 2010]. The radius of Autolycus is ∼16.5 km, while that of Aristillus is ∼27.5 km. Applying the ejecta thickness relationship for a complex crater given by Figure 10 shows the area fraction derived from the analytical model with 𝛿=0.32±0.02. are obtained using δ that is between 0.30 and 0.34; the upper bound of the gray area is at δ=0.34, the lower bound is at δ=0.30, and the black line in the middle gives the case of δ=0.32. For the ejecta-only case, because the result is independent of δ, it is uniquely determined. If an ejecta 0.41 m and that for the ejecta-breccia lens case as 3.85±0.25 m without ejecta coming from the The red line is the case when only an ejecta blanket is considered, while the black line with a gray area is the case when both an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens affect regolith formation. The results blanket is the only source of regolith, the regolith thickness is too shallow. On the other hand, if regolith is generated by both an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens, the amount of regolith significantly increases. We compute the expected regolith thickness for the ejecta-only case as outside of the landing site. This result indicates that ejecta blanketing does not contribute to regolith generation. Thus, given an addition of some exotic ejecta (~0.5 m), the case accounting for both an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens is consistent with the empirical study by Nakamura et al. [1975]. The parameters for the analytical model are described in Table 2. Finally, we argue that it is difficult to infer the regolith thickness from the crater equilibrium condition. Shoemaker et al. [1969] computed an upper limit of the regolith thickness by looking at the largest crater size that reaches crater equilibrium. Any craters smaller than this size have completely been lost due to crater degradation. Thus, they hypothesized that these craters should have experienced a regolith filling process on their final crater surfaces, and thus the excavation depth of the largest crater in crater equilibrium would be an upper bound of the regolith thickness [Shoemaker et al., 1969]. As discussed in Section 4.1, craters smaller than 50 m in radius are likely to be in crater equilibrium at the Apollo 15 landing site. Since the depth-to-diameter ratio is 0.13 for simple craters with a radius between 20 m and 50 m [Stopar et al., 2017], the excavation depth of the 50-m-radius crater is 13 m, and so is the regolith thickness. This regolith thickness is higher than the regolith thickness reported by Nakamura et al. [1975]. 4.3 Regolith growth timescale In this section, using our analytical model, we discuss if the regolith thickness still evolves at the Apollo 15 landing site. When a surface is initially intact, the regolith thickness rapidly increases. However, as the total number of craters increases, new craters are formed on old craters, and the amount of regolith generation gradually decreases. Eventually, the regolith thickness does not increase any longer. We define this evolution timescale as the regolith growth timescale. We describe the regolith thickness as functions of 𝑋 and the model age [Neukum et al., 2001]. We first 14 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. thickness function is also expressed as a function of the model age. Here, we only consider the To quantify the timescale that regolith growth ends, we note that the size of craters controls the regolith growth timescale. As the model age increases, it is likely that large craters affect regolith growth at the landing site, and the regolith thickness grows further. Therefore, the compute the expected regolith thickness as a function of 𝑋 by using Equation (18). Then, this case of 𝛿=0.32. timescale that regolith growth ceases depends on 𝑟FGH;< and 𝑟FGH"#$ . Here, for simplicity, we show the regolith thickness evolution under an assumption that 𝑟FGH;< and 𝑟FGH"#$ are the same and constant We consider three different cases. The first case is 𝑟FGH;< =𝑟FGH"#$=100 m, the second case is 𝑟FGH;< =𝑟FGH"#$=500 m, and the third case is 𝑟FGH;< =𝑟FGH"#$=1000 m. Figure 11 shows the time evolutions of the expected regolith thickness as a function of 𝑋 (0≤𝑋≤590) (Figure 11a) and that as a function of the model age (≤4.5 Ga) (Figure 11b). A flat slope in each case indicates that regolith growth ceases. The results show that although the regolith growth timescale at 𝑟FGH;< = 𝑟FGH"#$=100 m is the shortest, the regolith thickness in this case still increases rapidly at present. over a considered timescale. This assumption may be unrealistic because these quantities may be time-variant over a long timescale; however, with this assumption, we can quantitatively show how the regolith growth depends on the maximum crater size. The regolith growth timescale becomes long as the maximum radius considered increases. Therefore, if the Apollo 15 landing site is affected by further impact events, the regolith thickness should increase in all these cases. We compare the regolith growth timescale with the timescale of crater equilibrium. As discussed in Section 4.1, craters with a radius smaller than 50 m are in crater equilibrium at present (Figure 9). On the other hand, any cases tested above show that the regolith thickness still grows rapidly at present. Thus, we infer that the regolith growth timescale is significantly longer than the timescale of crater equilibrium. Note that our consideration does not account for other regolith formation processes such as volcanism; however, processes besides impacts are probably not relevant at the Apollo 15 landing site, at least after the period of mare emplacement [Nyquist and Shih, 1992]. 5 Discussion 5.1 Timescales of regolith growth and crater equilibrium We predicted that the regolith growth timescale is substantially longer than the crater equilibrium timescale at the Apollo 15 landing site. We propose that this timescale difference is attributed to how small crater formation can affect these processes. On a cratered surface, the topographic features are constantly degraded due to impact and thermal processes. Small craters play significant roles in topographic diffusion [Fassett and Thomson, 2014; Fassett et al., 2017], and micrometeorite impacts break down rock surfaces [Hörz and Cintala, 1997]. Significant temperature variations in planetary surfaces induce thermal cracking [Molaro et al., 2015]. The crater equilibrium timescale strongly depends on these processes. On the other hand, the regolith thickness is mainly controlled by how impact events fragment subsurface layers. The breccia lens of a pre-existing crater can be preserved until a larger crater is generated in the same location. It is important to note that a shock propagation during an impact cratering process is likely to damage a wider area [Collins et al., 2004], implying that such a damaged area may be an additional source 15 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. of regolith. This effect may increase the regolith growth rate. However, again, to generate additional regolith, new craters should be large enough to fragment intact layers. We address that by quantifying the regolith growth timescale, we may be able to estimate the actual impact flux from the regolith depth even if this surface is in crater equilibrium. It has long been argued that a surface that is in crater equilibrium is likely to lose the impact cratering history, and thus it is difficult to infer the surface condition from empirical data [e.g., Hartmann, 1984]. However, since the timescale of regolith growth is much longer than that of crater equilibrium, the regolith thickness provides useful information of the impact cratering history. Further investigations will shed light on the cratered surface evolution. 5.2 Dependence of the thickness of a breccia lens on the depth parameter In the previous sections, we define the depth parameter, 𝛿, as 0.30 – 0.34 by applying the ratio of the final crater depth to the final crater diameter obtained by Stopar et al. [2017]. Stopar et al. [2017] and Mahanti et al. [2018] proposed that small, simple craters might be shallower than large, simple craters. Specifically, the depth-to-diameter ratio is 0.13 for 20-to-50-m-radius craters, 0.15 for 50-to-100-m-radius craters, and 0.17 for 100-to-200-m-radius craters [Stopar et al., 2017]. However, terrestrial craters with a radius smaller than 250 m may have a unique V-shaped crater cavity; such craters are a so-called Odessa-type [Shoemaker et al., 2005]. This report implies that Odessa-type craters may have a high depth-to-diameter ratio (~0.25) and thus a thin breccia lens [Shoemaker et al., 2005]. The formation of a breccia lens results from the process that regolith at the rim slides down on the crater wall [Melosh, 1989; Collins, 2014]. For terrestrial craters, Shoemaker et al. [2005] implied that the thin breccia lens of Odessa-type craters might result from an inefficient regolith flow after the excavation phase. For lunar craters, to explain a low depth-to-diameter ratio of fresh small, simple craters, Mahanti et al. [2018] proposed a short-term infilling process possibly due to topographic diffusion after the crater formation. This feature was also observed by Basilevsky et al. [2014]. To compute the thickness of a breccia lens, we rule out a possibility that the depth of the transient crater of a small, simple crater may be shallower than that of a large, simple crater. The ratio of the transient crater depth to the transient crater diameter for Odessa crater is similar to that for Meteor crater [Short, 2006]. regolith thickness depends on 𝛿. Using the same simulation settings used in Table 2, we compute the regolith area fraction at present for three different 𝛿s: 𝛿=0.1, 0.2, and 0.34. Note that we give fraction varies due to 𝛿. The expected regolith thicknesses for the cases of 𝛿=0.1, 0.2, and 0.34 value of 𝛿. Also, we show the ejecta-only case in red. The regolith thickness in this case is shorter the case discussed in Section 4.2 as the third case for comparison. Figure 12 indicates how the area Because these works propose different thickness of a breccia lens, we discuss how the are 1.2 m, 2.4 m, and 4.1 m, respectively. It is found that the regolith thickness is sensitive to the than that in other cases. This result indicates that a breccia lens plays a primary role in regolith generation. Stopar et al. [2017] argued a possibility that the shallow depth-to-diameter ratio of fresh small, simple craters resulted from the inclusion of secondary craters. While these craters have been reported to have an influence on the surface morphology of the Moon and other planetary objects [e.g., McEwen et al., 2005; Bierhaus et al., 2005; McEwen and Bierhaus, 2006; Robinson et al., 2015], one interpretation of the results by Speyerer et al. [2016] is that generation of primary craters is far more frequent than that of secondary craters [Stopar et al., 2017]. If this is true, the 16 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. majority of craters investigated by them should be primary craters, although measuring the depth- to-diameter ratio only cannot identify if primary or secondary craters played a role in the shallow depth-to-diameter ratio [Stopar et al., 2017]. It may be possible that the volume of the breccia lens is the same in both Odessa-type craters on the Earth and small, simple craters with shallow depth- to-diameter ratios on the Moon. Thus, a different scaling relationship may provide consistent regolith growth on both terrestrial and lunar surfaces. An attempt at a successful explanation of these works is beyond our scope, although further improvement of the present model and investigations will shed light on this issue. 5.3 Volumes of ejecta and a breccia lens It is reasonable to consider that if the porosity is constant, the total volume of materials should not change before and after the crater formation process. However, our parameter setting does not explicitly satisfy this volume conservation condition and increases the volume up to 11% from the initial material volume during one crater formation. This inconsistency comes from the fact that we use crater profile parameters independently derived for the ejecta thickness [Sharpton, 2014] and the depth-to-diameter ratio [Stopar et al., 2017]. This process produced an additional material volume. Also, because of the use of the ejecta thickness condition by Sharpton [2014], the volume fraction of the ejecta over the total regolith generated during one crater formation becomes small. In the simulation with the parameters in Table 2, the volume of the ejecta is only 15% of the total regolith volume, while that of the breccia lens is 85 %. In a classical view, the volumes of the ejecta and the breccia lens are considered to be almost equal [Melosh, 1989]. In addition, small- scale experiments by Stöffler et al. [1975] implied that ejecta might dominate regolith generation during a crater formation in quartz sands although it may be difficult to identify the ejecta from the rim-uplifting feature. We test if the volume inconsistency and the small ejecta-volume fraction could affect our simulation. In this test, we modify the total rim height so that the material volume does not change. When the rim height is 0.053𝑟) (as comparison, 0.068𝑟) from Sharpton [2014]), the material obtain 𝛿=0.31 and 𝜎=0.053. The fraction of ejecta reaches 42% in the total regolith volume, volume is constant before and after one crater is formed. Also, we assume that all the volume in this rim height consists of ejecta and contributes to regolith generation. In these conditions, we and that of a breccia lens becomes 58%. Figure 13 shows this volume-constant cases and compares them with the cases that use the parameters in Table 2 (the original case). We find that these cases do not have a significant difference. For the ejecta-breccia lens cases, the expected regolith thicknesses for the volume-constant case is 3.91 m, while that for the original case is 3.85 m. For the ejecta-only cases, the expected regolith thicknesses are 1.26 m and 0.41 m for the volume- constant case and the original case, respectively. This test suggests that the formation of a breccia lens mainly controls the total amount of impact-generated regolith. 5.4 Future improvements of the analytical model We discuss open questions for the present analytical model. First, our analytical model does not consider the surface topographic evolution, although its analytical expression has been proposed in an earlier work [Rosenburg et al., 2015]. Second, secondary craters were likely to be included in our counting. Because of the impact speed and possible clustering, these craters might have contributed to regolith generation differently. The present study cannot distinguish the effects of primary and secondary craters, although we emphasize the importance of quantifying these 17 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. effects. Third, our model did not distinguish regolith in an ejecta blanket with that in a breccia lens. However, these regions may have different size distributions of regolith materials. Fourth, the formation of multiple craters may further fragment surface materials, causing the size distribution evolution of regolith materials. This consideration may be related to the mechanism of regolith mixing [Gault et al., 1974; Arnold, 1975; Speyerer et al., 2016; Costello et al., 2017]. Fifth, the ejecta thickness scaling law that we applied is known to be oversimplified. Huang et al. [2017] showed that distal ejecta would affect mixing process based on the patterns of crater rays. Thus, such spatial heterogeneity would control the magnitude of regolith mixing. Finally, we address that the discrepancy of the volume fractions of ejecta and a breccia lens is a critical issue to reconcile our model with the recent findings of small, simple craters on the lunar surface. Further investigations of all these questions are our future work. 6 Conclusion We developed a new analytical model that accounted for the effect of a breccia lens and an ejecta blanket to compute the evolution of the regolith thickness via the formation of multiple small, simple impact craters (< 381 m in radius for ejecta blanketing and < 100 m in radius for regolith infilling on the transient crater cavity). This analytical model was statistically designed to be able to account for the decrease in the volume of newly produced regolith due to crater overlapping. This model was evaluated using two Monte Carlo simulation techniques; we confirmed that a breccia lens played a more critical role in producing regolith than an ejecta blanket. We applied this analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 site. Our model predicted that regolith with a thickness of 3.85 m might be generated locally. Given some amount of externally originated regolith (~0.5 m), our result was consistent with a seismic experiment conducted by the Apollo 15 crews, 4.4 m. The results successfully showed that the regolith thickness was controlled by the size distribution of craters and varied spatially due to the stochastic location of specific impacts. Also, we found that the regolith thickness has not reached a steady state but might still increase with additional impacts. Because this surface is in crater equilibrium at present, we concluded that the timescale of regolith growth is longer than that of crater equilibrium. Acknowledgments, Samples, and Data M.H. J.M.S., and D.A.M. acknowledge support by the NASA LDAP program (NNH15ZDA001N-LDAP). M.H. also thanks for support by an assistant professor startup funding from Department of Aerospace Engineering at Auburn University. C.I.F. acknowledges support by the NASA LDAP program. The authors thank Dr. Gareth Collins and anonymous referees for useful comments that substantially improved our manuscript. The crater counting data and the parameters used for the analytical model are found in supporting information. 18 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. References Arnold, J. R. (1975), Monte Carlo simulation of turnover processes in the lunar regolith, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings 2, 2375-2395. Bart, G. D., R. D. Nickerson, M. T. Lawder, and H. J. Melosh (2011), Global survey of lunar regolith depths from LROC images, Icarus, 215(2), 485–490, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.017. Basilevsky, A. T., M. A. Kreslavsky, L. P. Karachevtseva, and E. N. Gusakova, Morphometry of small impact craters in the Lunokhod-1 and Lunokhod-2 study areas, Planetary and Space Sciences 92, 77-87, doi:10.1016/j.pss.2013.12.016. Bernatowicz, T. J., and C. M. Hohenberg (1978), Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings 9, 905-919. Bierhaus, E. B., C. R. Chapman, and W. J. Merline (2005), Secondary craters on Europa and implications for cratered surfaces, Nature, 437, 1125 - 1127, doi:10.1038/nature04069. Blewett, D. T., P. G. Lucey, B. R. Hawke, and B. L. Jolliff (1997), Clementine images of the lunar sample-return stations: Refinement of FeO and TiO2 mapping techniques, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 102(E7), 16319–16325, doi:10.1029/97JE01505. Christensen, P. R., E. Engle, S. Anwar, S. Dickenshied, D. Noss, N. Gorelick, and M. Weiss- Malik (2009), JMARS - A Planetary GIS, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, IN22A-06. Collins, G. S., H. J. Melosh, and B. A. Ivanov (2004), Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39(2), 217–231, doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x. Collins, G. S. (2014), Numerical simulations of impact crater formation with dilatancy, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(12), 2600–2619, doi:10.1002/2014JE004708. Costello, E. S., R. R. Ghent, and P. G. Lucey (2017), A Refreshed Model for the Mixing Rate of Lunar Regolith, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings 48, 1964. Delbo, M., G. Libourel, J. Wilkerson, N. Murdoch, P. Michel, K. T. Ramesh, C. Ganino, C. Verati, and S. Marchi (2014), Thermal fatigue as the origin of regolith on small asteroids, Nature, 508(7495), 233–236, doi:10.1038/nature13153. Fa, W., and M. A. Wieczorek (2012), Regolith thickness over the lunar nearside: Results from Earth-based 70-cm Arecibo radar observations, Icarus, 218(2), 771–787, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.01.010.Fa, W., T. Liu, M. H. Zhu, and J. Haruyama (2014), Regolith thickness over Sinus Iridum: Results from morphology and size-frequency distribution of small impact craters, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(8), 1914–1935, doi:10.1002/2013JE004604. Fa, W., M. H. Zhu, T. Liu, and J. B. Plescia (2015), Regolith stratigraphy at the Chang'E-3 19 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. landing site as seen by lunar penetrating radar, Geophysical Research Letters, 42(23), 10,179–10,187, doi:10.1002/2015GL066537. Fassett, C. I., J. W. Head, D. E. Smith, M. T. Zuber, and G. A. Neumann (2011), Thickness of proximal ejecta from the Orientale Basin from Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) data: Implications for multi-ring basin formation, Geophysical Research Letters, 38(17), n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2011GL048502. Fassett, C. I., and B. J. Thomson (2014), Crater degradation on the lunar maria: Topographic diffusion and the rate of erosion on the Moon, JGR: Planets, 119, 2255-2281, doi:10.1002/2014JE004698. Fassett, C. I., M. C. Crowley, C. Leight, M. D. Dyar, D. A. Minton, M. Hirabayashi, B. J. Thomson, and W. A. Watters, Evidence for rapid topographic evolution and crater degradation on Mercury from simple crater morphometry, GRL, 44, 5326-5335, doi:10.1002/2017/GL073769. Gault, D. E., F. Hörz, and D. E. Brownlee (1974), Mixing of the lunar regolith, Proceedings of Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 3, 2365-2386. Hartmann, W. K. (1984), Does crater "saturation equilibrium" occur in the solar system?, Icarus 60(1), 56-74, doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90138-6. Heiken, G. H., D. T. Vaniman, and B. M. French (1991), Lunar Sourcebook: a user's guide to the moon, Cambridge University Press. Hirabayashi, M., D. A. Minton, and C. I. Fassett (2017), An analytical model of crater count equilibrium, Icarus, 289, 134–143, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.032. Hörz, F., and M. Cintala (1997), The Barringer Award Address Presented 1996 July 25, Berlin, Germany: Impact experiments related to the evolution of planetary regoliths, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 32(2), 179-209, doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01259.x. Huang, Y. H., D. A. Minton, M. Hirabayashi, J. R. Elliott, J. E. Richardson, C. I. Fassett, and N. E. B. Zellner (2017), Heterogeneous impact transport on the Moon, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 13(1-3), 67, doi:10.1002/2016JE005160. Lucey, P. G., G. J. Taylor, and E. Malaret (1995), Abundance and distribution of iron on the Moon, Science 268(5214), 1150-1153, doi:10.1126/science.268.5214.1150. Mahanti, P., M. S. Robinson, T. J. Thompson, and M. R. Henriksen (2018), Small lunar craters at the Apollo 16 and 17 landing sites - morphology and degradation, Icarus, 299, 475–501, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.08.018. Mccauley, J. F., J. E. Guest, G. G. Schaber, N. J. Trask, and R. Greeley (1981), Stratigraphy of the Caloris basin, Mercury, Icarus, 47(2), 184–202, doi:10.1016/0019-1035(81)90166-4. McEwen, A. S., B. S. Preblich, E. P. Turtle, N. A. Artemieva, M. P. Golombek, M. Hurst, R. L. 20 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Kirk, D. M. Burr, and P. R. Christensen (2005), The rayed crater Zunil and interpretations of small impact craters on Mars, Icarus, 172(2), 351–381, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.02.009. McEwen, A. S., and E. B. Bierhaus (2006), The importance of secondary cratering to age constraints on planetary surfaces, Annual Review of Earth Planetary Science, 34, 535 - 567, doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125018. McGetchin, T. R., M. Settle, and J. W. Head (1973), Radial thickness variation in impact crater ejecta: implications for lunar basin deposits, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 20(2), 226–236, doi:10.1016/0012-821X(73)90162-3. Melosh, H. J. (1989), Impact cratering: A geologic process, Research supported by NASA. New York, Oxford University Press (Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, No. 11), 1989, 253 p., 11. Minton, D. A., J. E. Richardson, and C. I. Fassett (2015), Re-examining the main asteroid belt as the primary source of ancient lunar craters, Icarus, 247, 172–190, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.018. Molaro, J. L., S. Byrne, and S. A. Langer (2015), Grain-scale thermoelastic stresses and spatiotemporal temperature gradients on airless bodies, implications for rock breakdown, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120(2), 255–277, doi:10.1002/2014JE004729. Nakamura, Y., J. Dorman, F. Duennebier, D. Lammlein, and G. Latham (1975), Shallow lunar structure determined from the passive seismic experiment, The Moon, 13(1-3), 57–66, doi:10.1007/BF00567507. Neukum, G., B. A. Ivanov, and W. K. Hartmann (2001), Cratering Records in the Inner Solar System in Relation to the Lunar Reference System, in Chronology and Evolution of Mars, vol. 12, pp. 55–86, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. Nyquist, L. E., and C. Y. Shih (1992), The isotopic record of lunar volcanism, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56(6), 2213–2234, doi:10.1016/0016-7037(92)90185-L. Oberbeck, V. R., and W. L. Quaide (1967), Estimated thickness of a fragmental surface layer of Oceanus Procellarum, Journal of Geophysical Research, 72(18), 4697–4704, doi:10.1029/JZ072i018p04697. Oberbeck, V. R., W. L. Quaide, M. Mahan, and J. Paulson (1973), Monte Carlo calculations of lunar Regolith thickness distributions, Icarus, 19(1), 87–107, doi:10.1016/0019- 1035(73)90141-3. Pike, R. J. (1974), Ejecta from large craters on the Moon: Comments on the geometric model of McGetchin et al, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 23(3), 265–271, doi:10.1016/0012- 821X(74)90114-9. Quaide, W. L., and V. R. Oberbeck (1968), Thickness determinations of the lunar surface layer from lunar impact craters, Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(16), 5247–5270, 21 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. doi:10.1029/JB073i016p05247. Richardson, J. E. (2009), Cratering saturation and equilibrium: A new model looks at an old problem, Icarus, 204(2), 697–715, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.029. Robbins, S. J. et al. (2014), The variability of crater identification among expert and community crater analysts, Icarus, 234, 109–131, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.02.022. Robinson, M. S., A. K. Boyd, B. W. Denevi, S. J. Lawrence, A. S. McEwen, D. E. Moser, R. Z. Povilaitis, R. W. Stelling, R. M. Suggs, S. D. Thompson, and R. V. Wagner, New crater on the Moon and a swarm of secondaries, Icarus, 252, 229 - 235, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.019. Rosenburg, M. A., O. Aharonson, and R. Sari (2015), Topographic power spectra of cratered terrains: Theory and application to the Moon, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120(2), 177–194, doi:10.1002/2014JE004746. Ryder, G., D. Bogard, and D. Garrison (1991), Probable age of Autolycus and calibration of lunar stratigraphy, Geology, 19(2), 143–146, doi:10.1130/0091- 7613(1991)019<0143:PAOAAC>2.3.CO;2. Sharpton, V. L. (2014), Outcrops on lunar crater rims: Implications for rim construction mechanisms, ejecta volumes and excavation depths, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119(1), 154–168, doi:10.1002/2013JE004523. Shoemaker, E. M., R. M. Batson, H. E. Holt, E. C. Morris, J. J. Rennilson, and E. A. Whitaker (1967), Surveyor V: Television Pictures, Science, 158(3801), 642–652, doi:10.1126/science.158.3801.642. Shoemaker, E. M., R. M. Batson, H. E. Holt, E. C. Morris, J. J. Rennilson, and E. A. Whitaker (1969), Observations of the lunar regolith and the Earth from the television camera on Surveyor 7, Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(25), 6081–6119, doi:10.1029/JB074i025p06081. Shoemaker, E. M., F. A. Macdonald, and C. S. Shoemaker (2005), Geology of five small Australian impact craters, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 52(4-5), 529–544, doi:10.1080/08120090500180921. Short, N. M. (2006), A COMPARISON OF FEATURES CHARACTERISTIC OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSION CRATERS AND ASTROBLEMES, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 123(2), 573–616, doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20389.x. Smith, D. E. et al. (2010), Initial observations from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA), Geophysical Research Letters, 37(18), n/a–n/a, doi:10.1029/2010GL043751. Speyerer, E. J., R. Z. Povilaitis, M. S. Robinson, P. C. Thomas, and R. V. Wagner (2016), Quantifying crater production and regolith overturn on the Moon with temporal imaging, Nature, 538(7624), 215–218, doi:10.1038/nature19829. 22 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Stöffler, D., D. E. Gault, J. Wedekind, and G. Polkowski (1975), Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand: Distribution and shock metamorphism of ejecta, Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 4062-4077, doi:10.1029/JB080i029p04062. Stopar, J. D., M. S. Robinson, O. S. Barnouin, A. S. McEwen, E. J. Speyerer, M. R. Henriksen, and S. S. Sutton (2017), Relative depths of simple craters and the nature of the lunar regolith, Icarus, 298, 34–48, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.05.022. Spudis, P. D. (1978), Composition and origin of the Apennine Bench Formation, Proceedings of Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 9, 3379-3394. Spudis, P. D., and G. Ryder (1985), Geology and petrology of the Apollo 15 landing site: Past, present, and future understanding, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 66(43), 721–726, doi:10.1029/EO066i043p00721. Sturm, S., T. Kenkmann, and S. Hergarten (2016), Ejecta thickness and structural rim uplift measurements of Martian impact craters: Implications for the rim formation of complex impact craters, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 121(6), 1026–1053, doi:10.1002/2015JE004959. Tran, T., M. R. Rosiek, R. A. Beyer, S. Mattson, E. Howington-Kraus, M S. Robinson, B. A. Archinal, K. Edmundson, D. Harbour, E. Anderson, and the LROC Science Team (2010), Generating digital terrain models using LROC NAC images, At ASPRS/CaGIS 2010. Wells, K. S., D. B. Campbell, B. A. Campbell, and L. M. Carter (2010), Detection of small lunar secondary craters in circular polarization ratio radar images, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 115(E6), 2817, doi:10.1029/2009JE003491. Wilcox, B. B., M. S. Robinson, P. C. Thomas, and B. R. HAWKE (2005), Constraints on the depth and variability of the lunar regolith, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 40(5), 695– 710, doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00974.x. Wilhelms, D. E. (1980), Stratigraphy of part of the lunar near side, USGS Numbered Series published by U.S. Government Printing Office, 1046. Xie, M., and M. H. Zhu (2016), Estimates of primary ejecta and local material for the Orientale basin: Implications for the formation and ballistic sedimentation of multi-ring basins, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 440, 71–80, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.012. 23 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Tables Table 1. Values of the depth parameter, 𝜎, for different conditions. 𝜅 indicates the slope of the 𝜿=𝟑.𝟎 𝜿∗=𝟑.𝟕 Literature [e.g., Melosh, 1989] 0.034 0.051 ejecta thickness. Ejecta thickness at the rim Rim height Sharpton [2014] 0.014 0.021 0.068 0.10 Symbol Value [Units] 0.32±0.2[-] Table 2. Model parameters for the analytical model used for calculations of regolith thickness at the Apollo 15 landing site. [-] in Value means that the value is non-dimensional. Parameter Ratio of the breccia lens thickness ratio at the crater center to the crater radius Ratio of the Ejecta thickness ratio at the crater rim to the crater radius Slope of the ejecta thickness Max. crater radius affecting regolith formation by regolith infilling on the transient crater cavity Max. crater radius affecting regolith formation due to ejecta blanketing Slope of the produced crater CSFD Produced crater CSFD coefficient Normalized crater number 𝛿 𝜎 𝜅 𝑟FGH;< 𝑟FGH"#$ 𝜂 𝜉 𝑋 3.2 [-] 2.21 [m1.2] 1.0 [-] 3.0 [-] 100 [m] 0.014 [-] 381 [m] 24 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Figures Figure 1. Schematic plot of the regolith region after a simple crater is formed. The gray region is a non-regolith region, while the orange area is a regolith region. Figure 2. Schematic plot about how the analytical model deals with crater overlapping. The top figure shows the elevation along the horizontal direction. The gray area is the intact region. The bottom plot indicates the regolith thickness along the horizontal direction. a. Initial crater formation. b. Crater overlap. The orange region is the regolith area produced by the initial crater, while the dark blue region is the regolith region developed by a new crater's formation. 25 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Figure 3. Schematic plot that explains the maximum crater radius contributing to regolith production due to regolith infilling on the transient crater cavity and that by ejecta blanketing. The dark gray regions are the breccia lens regions, while the light gray areas are the ejecta-blanket regions. Oberbeck et al. [1973]. The blue and red lines show the results of 𝜎∗=0.021 and 𝜎∗=0.051, Figure 4. Comparison of the analytical model with the Monte Carlo simulation by Oberbeck et al. [1973]. The black dashed lines with squares describe the range of the results in Figure 1a in respectively, obtained by the analytical model. 26 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Figure 5. Regolith thickness by CTEM. The crater radius in this case is 38.2 m. a. The case only accounts for an ejecta blanket. b. The case considers an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens. The white dashed circles indicate the crater rim. Figure 6. Comparison of the analytical model with CTEM. The gray solid lines show 50 cases computed by CTEM with different random seeds. The black solid lines indicate the result of the analytical model, and the black dashed lines describe the means of the results from CTEM. a. The produced crater CTEM. b. The regolith area fraction. The 𝑥 axis is the area fraction, while the 𝑦 axis shows the depth. 27 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Montes Apenninus g s it e LM n ti n u o C N Autolycus Aristillus Hadley Rille Hadley C Palus Putredinis Figure 7. The landscape around the Apollo 15 site. Reference of the image: AS15-M-1423. 28 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. a. Shaded Relief Map b. Digital Terrain Model 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 180 160 140 120 ] m 100 [ n o i t a v e E l 80 60 40 20 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Figure 8. The region that we conduct crater counting. The selected area is the northern region in the original image (25.59–26.54°N, 3.50–3.69°E). a. The shaded relief map of the selected area (NAC_DTM_APOLLO15_SHADE.TIF). area (NAC_DTM_APOLLO15.TIF). The DTM selected the b. of 29 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Crater count equilibrium 1.2 X 105 r-1.5 e d cr 8 r- 3.2 ate r C P r o 1.1 d u c X 1 0 S F D Figure 9. The visible crater CSFD at the Apollo 15 site in log-log space. The red-edge circles indicate our empirical result by crater counting. The solid line describes the best fitting function obtained by the technique by Hirabayashi et al. [2017]. The equilibrium slope is given by the dashed line, and the produced crater CSFD is described by the dotted line. Figure 10. The regolith area fraction at the Apollo 15 landing site. The 𝑥 axis is the area fraction, while the 𝑦 axis shows the depth. The black line with a gray area describes the case considering an ejecta blanket and a breccia lens. The results are obtained using δ raging between 0.30 and 0.34. The solid line in the middle of the gray area is the result for δ=0.32. The red line indicates the case only accounting for an ejecta blanket. Because the ejecta-only case is independent of δ, it is uniquely determined. 30 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. of 𝑋 (0≤𝑋≤590). b. The thickness evolution as a function of the model age (≤4.5 Ga). Figure 11. Evolution of the expected regolith thickness. a. The thickness evolution as a function Figure 12. Regolith area fractions with different 𝛿s. The red line shows the ejecta-only case for comparison. 31 Breccia lenses of simple craters as a primary contributor to regolith formation by Hirabayashi et al. Figure 13. Comparison of the case derived using the parameters in Table 2 (in blue) and the case when the total crater volume is conserved (in red). "E-BL" is the ejecta-breccia lens case, while "E-only" shows the ejecta-only case. The solid lines are the ejecta-breccia lens cases, while the dashed lines are the ejecta-only cases. 32
1912.04676	1	1912	2019-12-10T13:22:44	Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We propose a semianalytical method for the calculation of widths, libration centers and small amplitude libration periods of the mean motion resonances k_p:k in the framework of the circular restricted three body problem valid for arbitrary eccentricities and inclinations. Applying the model to the trans Neptunian region (TNR) we obtain several atlas of resonances between 30 and 100 au showing their domain in the plane (a,e) for different orbital inclinations. The resonance width may change substantially when varying the argument of the perihelion of the resonant object and in order to take into account these variations we introduce the concept of resonance fragility. Resonances 1:k and 2:k are the widest, strongest, most isolated ones and with lower fragility for all interval of inclinations and eccentricities. We discuss about the existence of high k_p:k resonances. We analyze the distribution of the resonant populations inside resonances 1:1, 2:3, 3:5, 4:7, 1:2 and 2:5. We found that the populations are in general located near the regions of the space (e,i) where the resonances are wider and less fragile with the notable exception of the population inside the resonance 4:7 and in a lesser extent the population inside 3:5 which are shifted to lower eccentricities.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune Tabar´e Gallardo 9 1 0 2 c e D 0 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 6 7 6 4 0 . 2 1 9 1 : v i X r a Received: July 22, 2019/ Accepted: December 10, 2019 Abstract We propose a semianalytical method for the calculation of widths, libra- tion centers and small amplitude libration periods of the mean motion resonances kp:k in the framework of the circular restricted three body problem valid for arbi- trary eccentricities and inclinations. Applying the model to the trans Neptunian region (TNR) we obtain several atlas of resonances between 30 and 100 au showing their domain in the plane (a, e) for different orbital inclinations. The resonance width may change substantially when varying the argument of the perihelion of the resonant object and in order to take into account these variations we intro- duce the concept of resonance fragility. Resonances 1:k and 2:k are the widest, strongest, most isolated ones and with lower fragility for all interval of inclinations and eccentricities. We discuss about the existence of high kp:k resonances. We an- alyze the distribution of the resonant populations inside resonances 1:1, 2:3, 3:5, 4:7, 1:2 and 2:5. We found that the populations are in general located near the regions of the space (e, i) where the resonances are wider and less fragile with the notable exception of the population inside the resonance 4:7 and in a lesser extent the population inside 3:5 which are shifted to lower eccentricities. Keywords Mean motion resonances · Trans Neptunian objects · Semianalitycal model · Retrograde orbits 1 Introduction The resonant structure of the TNR was explored by numerical integrations of test particles (Levison and Duncan, 1993; Duncan et al., 1995; Malhotra, 1996; Melita and Brunini, 2000, for example) and by application of analytical theories that depend on the adopted approach for the resonant disturbing function. Analytical expansions of the disturbing function (Beaug´e, 1996; Ellis and Murray, 2000, for to be published in CMDA topical collection on Trans-Neptunian Objects T. Gallardo Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la Rep´ublica, Igu´a 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tabar´e Gallardo example) are limited to some interval of eccentricities and/or inclinations. Ana- lytical expansions around arbitrary specific points of the phase space (also called asymmetric expansions) allowed the study of the resonant motion around the cen- ter of the expansion (Ferraz-Mello and Sato, 1989; Gallardo and Ferraz-Mello, 1995; Roig et al., 1998) and they were applied to understand the dynamics of the asteroidal resonances mostly. Semianalytical methods, that means analytical the- ories based on the numerical evaluation of the disturbing function, allowed a very precise description of the planar mean motion resonances (MMRs) in the asteroid belt and in the TNR (Schubart, 1964; Moons and Morbidelli, 1993; Morbidelli et al., 1995, and subsequent references). Resonance's properties for planar direct orbits were very well described since then. Retrograde resonances appeared in the eighties related to studies on dynamical evolution of comets (Emelyanenko, 1985; Carusi et al., 1986), but probably because it sounded very unlikely, only in the last years the planar retrograde (Morais and Giuppone, 2012; Morais and Namouni, 2013b) and then the general inclined resonance problem was started to be studied systematically (Morais and Namouni, 2013a; Namouni and Morais, 2015; Morais and Namouni, 2016; Namouni and Morais, 2017a; Morais and Namouni, 2017; Voyatzis et al., 2018; Lei, 2019). Some of these studies provide a general picture of the resonances but limited to some interval of eccentricity and/or inclination. An analytical expression for the resonant disturbing function for arbitrary (e, i) has in general several terms that must be taken into account globally in order to have a complete picture of the resonance. Namouni and Morais (2017b) and Namouni and Morais (2018) presented a theory that allows to find specific terms of the analytical expansion for arbitrary spatial resonances. The theory by Lei (2019) is very similar to the one presented by Namouni and Morais (2018) but arranging the resonant terms in a more compact way providing a more global description of the whole resonance and not limited to individual resonant terms. Both theories are valid in all interval of inclinations but limited to e ≤ 0.5 due to convergence problems in the series expansions. In a different approach and by means of a numerical evaluation of the resonant disturbing function Gallardo (2006, 2019) calculated the resonance's strength and provided a general picture of all kind of resonances in therms of strengths. Both approaches by Lei (2019) and Gallardo (2006, 2019) put in evidence that the particle's argument of the perihelion is crucial for the definition of the strength and width of a resonance in the spatial case. We present here a semianalytical model based on the numerical evaluation of the resonant disturbing function, which assumes some approximations that sim- plify greatly the theory providing a very fast method for automatically computing equilibrium points, libration periods and widths of MMRs for orbits with arbitrary eccentricities and inclinations. Moreover, we introduce a new concept: the fragility of resonances. In section 2 we explain and test the model. In section 3 we exten- sively apply the model to the TNR obtaining several atlas containing hundreds of resonances and we discuss about the existence of high kp:k resonances. In section 4 we analyze six known populations of resonant trans Neptunian objects (TNOs). We end with a summary in section 5. Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 3 2 A model for spatial MMRs 2.1 Resonant Hamiltonian Let us consider the MMR that we note as kp:k, which corresponds to the com- mensurability kpnp (cid:39) kn, being kp, k positive integers that do not have common divisors and np, n the mean motions of the planet and the TNO respectively. The corresponding critical angle is given by σ = kλ − kpλp + (kp − k) (1) where subindex p denotes planet. Note that using this notation 3:1, for example, is an interior resonance and 1:3 an exterior resonance and it is not necessary to specify whether it is interior or exterior or whether it is direct or retrograde. The last term for σ in Eq. (1) can be a combination of and Ω (longitudes of the perihelion and ascending node respectively) but that is not relevant for our purposes as we will explain. Following, for example, Nesvorn´y et al. (2002) or Saillenfest et al. (2016) the semi secular Hamiltonian obtained eliminating the short period terms depending on λ or λp, but not on σ, is H(a, e, i, ω, σ) = − µ 2a − np kp k √ µa − R(a, e, i, ω, σ) (2) where µ = GM(cid:12). Note that the dependence with e, i, ω is through the resonant dis- turbing function R. As H does not depend explicitly with the time it is conserved and the solutions occur in surfaces defined by H(a, e, i, ω, σ) = constant. Several analytical developments of R(a, e, i, ω, σ) have been proposed, each one valid in some interval of the orbital elements. We will adopt here the approximation given by Gallardo (2006, 2019) where, for the resonance kp:k, R is numerically evaluated assuming fixed values for (a ≡ a0, e, i, ω): R(σ) = 1 2πk R(λp, λ(λp, σ))dλp (3) (cid:90) 2πk 0 (cid:16) where a0 is the nominal value for the exact resonance and R is the disturbing function of the planet with mass mp and heliocentric position rp on the particle with heliocentric position r: R = Gmp 1 rp − r − r · rp r3 p (cid:17) (4) The mean longitude of the asteroid, λ, in (3) is expressed as a function of (λp, σ) according to Eq. (1). This numerical averaging is the same proposed by Schubart (1964) but assuming fixed (a, e, i, ω) in the calculation of the integral (3). The assumption of fixed ω does not introduce any spurious result because ω varies in very long time scales. On the other hand, the elements (a, e, i) do vary a little during one resonant libration but, as we will show, their variations do not introduce relevant changes in the numerical calculation of the equilibrium points, libration periods and resonance widths. Then, the approximation assumed implies that the resonant Hamiltonian have two variables (a, σ) and it depends also on the fixed parameters (e, i, ω). The solutions will be level curves H(a, σ), and analyzing them we can identify the stable and unstable equilibrium points, the librations around 4 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 1 Resonance 1:3 with Neptune for an orbit with e = 0.7, i = 90◦, ω = 0◦. Top: some level curves for H(a, σ) given by Eq. (5) including the separatrix. Bottom: corresponding R(a0, σ) given by Eq. (3). The stable equilibrium points are the minimum for R located at σ = 26◦ and σ = 334◦. The unstable equilibrium points are located at σ = 0◦ and σ = 180◦. The separatrix passing by the unstable equilibrium point at σ = 180◦ and a0 = 62.63 au defines the total width of the resonance (see section 2.3), indicated with arrows, which turns out to be 0.8 au. the stable points and the separatrices as we will explain below. The level curves of H = constant are calculated using H(a, σ) = − µ 2a − np kp k √ µa − R(a0, σ) (5) 2.2 Equilibrium points and libration periods To obtain the equations for (a, σ) we should first change to the canonical variables (Σ, σ) where Σ = √ µa/k. The canonical equations are = − ∂H ∂σ ∂H ∂Σ = dΣ dt dσ dt From Eq. (6) operating we obtain da dt = 2k(cid:112)µ/a ∂R ∂σ (6) (7) (8) from which we conclude that the dependence of R with σ defines the dynamical behavior of the resonance because the stronger the dependence of R with σ the 62 62.2 62.4 62.6 62.8 63 63.2 63.4a (au) 060120180240300360Rσ (deg)Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 5 larger the rate of change of a due to the resonant motion. The equilibrium points are defined by the condition dσ dt = da dt = 0 (9) Using this condition, from Eq. (1) assuming d/dt = 0 it follows that the equilib- rium points are at a = a0. But using Eqs. (9) and (8) we have that the equilibrium points verify ∂R ∂σ (10) In Fig. 1 we show an example where the equilibrium points are located at σ = 0◦, 26◦, 180◦ and 334◦. Being (Σ0, σ0) an equilibrium point in canonical variables, if we consider some small displacement (S, s), using the canonical equations we can obtain the first order expansions = 0 = −Hσσs − HσΣS dS dt (11) = HΣσs + HΣΣS ds dt (12) where subscripts in H mean partial derivatives. Looking for solutions of the type S = A exp(2πt/T ) and s = B exp(2πt/T ) it is straightforward to prove that oscillations only occur with a libration period, T , in years given by T = a k 2π√ 3Rσσ (13) where Rσσ is the second derivative calculated numerically at the stable equilibrium point. 2.3 Resonance widths The resonance's half width ∆a is equal to the difference between a0 and asep where asep is defined by the separatrix such that H(asep, σs) = H(a0, σu) (14) being σs and σu the stable and unstable equilibrium points. The total width is twice ∆a and in Fig. 1 is shown with vertical arrows. Be ∆H = H(asep, σs) − H(a0, σs), then we can approximate ∂H ∂a ∂2H ∂a2 ∆H = ∆a + (15) (∆a)2 2 + . . . Evaluating the derivatives at the stable equilibrium point and using (14) we have ∆H = H(a0, σu) − H(a0, σs) (cid:39) ∂2H ∂a2 (∆a)2 2 The left hand is R(σs) − R(σu) = −∆R (16) (17) Tabar´e Gallardo n2 ∂2H ∂a2 = − 3 (cid:112)8/3 4 ∆a (cid:39) √ ∆R 6 while then the half width of the resonance expressed in au is n (18) where ∆R is the maximum amplitude of R(σ). Then for a specific resonance with a defined planet the method consists in, given (e, i, ω), calculate numerically the function R(σ) and deducing numerically ∆R and Rσσ at the stable equilibrium points in order to calculate ∆a and the periods of the small amplitude librations. As we assume and Ω constants it is irrelevant which combination of these angles we use in (1) because all them will generate the same ∆R and Rσσ. Up to now this method is analogue to the analytical method given by Lei (2019) but here we calculate R numerically while in Lei (2019) an analytical expansion is used and consequently it is not applicable for very high eccentricities. Both methods calculate widths using R evaluated at the equilibrium points and are unable to distinguish asymmetries between the left and right limits of the resonances. Those asymmetries are especially noticeable in some first order resonances with Jupiter (Nesvorn´y et al., 2002). 2.4 Calculation of ∆R in close encounters The calculation of the resonance width is a fundamental problem in resonance dynamics. Usually, the width is defined by the separatrix in an analogue procedure as we have done here. But the region close to the separatrix is chaotic and chaos is especially important when resonances are so wide that they overlap. In these cases the widths deduced from separatrices are larger than the regions where the oscillations are really stable. Also, for sufficiently eccentric orbits having large amplitude librations, a close encounter between the object and the planet can occur, generating a peak in R and disrupting the resonant motion. To avoid these flaws and in order to have reliable widths for the planar case Malhotra (1996), Malhotra et al. (2018) and Lan and Malhotra (2019) defined the widths only for stable librations obtained by means of numerical explorations using Poincar surface of sections. For the same reason Gallardo (2006) defined the strength of the resonance as SR =< R > −Rmin, a parameter that is not strongly affected by the maximum peaks of R generated in situations of close encounters. Using our approach, in the process of calculation of R(σ) for a given σ, when varying λ and λp, the particle may be placed in a configuration of close encounter with the planet. If there is no collision it is possible to calculate R(σ) with enough precision, but it will be an unstable configuration and in the real world the res- onant motion will be broken. Then, following the criteria of stable librations, in order to calculate ∆R to obtain reliable maximum resonance widths, we do not take into account values of R obtained in circumstances of close encounters. After some numerical experiments comparing our predicted widths with the results of numerical integrations we found that a safe distance is 3RH , where RH is the planetary Hill's radius. A resonant TNO encountering Neptune at less than 3RH brakes the resonant configuration. We have also found that the limit has some Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 7 dependence with the orbital inclination. For near zero inclination orbits the ac- tual limit probably is between 3 and 4RH but for high inclinations is closer to 2RH . The disruption of the resonant motion depends on the minimum distance to the planet but also on the relative velocity which strongly depends on the or- bital inclination. So, 3RH is a compromise in order to have an idea of the safe maximum resonance widths in situations of close encounters. We remark that, theoretically, libration amplitudes can be larger but most probably unstable. In our model we do not consider the superposition of resonances as a limitation for the resonance width. If that situation exists, it will be evident when calculating a series of neighboring resonances. We have written a code in FORTRAN for com- puting R(σ), ∆R, the total width of the resonance, the location of the equilibrium points and corresponding libration periods of the small amplitude oscillations. It is not difficult to generalize the algorithm to the case of an eccentric planet. It can be downloaded from www.fisica.edu.uy/∼gallardo/atlas/ra. In the next subsection we present some tests of our model in extreme situations. 2.5 Testing the model with dynamical maps We have tested our model comparing the predicted widths with the ones that can be deduced by means of dynamical maps calculated with the numerical integrations of the exact equations of motion considering the Sun, Neptune in circular and zero inclination orbit and massless particles in arbitrary orbits. We have found a very good agreement in very different circumstances and we will illustrate with two extreme cases related to the resonance 1:3 involving collision with Neptune. The first case is the study of the resonance widths in the space (a, e) for orbits with i = ω = 0◦. These conditions imply that for e > 0.51 there will be a collision for some value of σ. We calculated dynamical maps taking a grid of initial conditions covering 61.6 < a < 63.6 au and 0 < e < 0.98 and we computed the mean baricentric semimajor axes after 10 orbital periods and then the variation ∆a of the mean values after 200 orbital periods. Using this methodology we eliminate short period oscillations of a and we can distinguish the orbital changes due to the librations. The resulting dynamical map strongly depends on the chosen initial value of σ in the numerical integrations. For different initial σ we will obtain different libration amplitudes so, for different intervals in e, we choose different initial σ according to the locations of the equilibrium points, so that the resonant regions obtained in the map are the widest possible. The result is shown in Fig. 2 left panel, where black and blue regions of the map correspond to minimum changes typical of secular evolutions, red corresponds to oscillations due to the resonant motion and yellow corresponds to large changes due to disruption of the resonance. The domain of the stable resonance is the red region. In the yellow regions for e > 0.5 the orbits abandon the resonance due to close encounters with Neptune. The dark regions near the nominal value a0 are due to small amplitude oscillations around the equilibrium points inside the resonance. In Fig. 2 right panel we show the limits computed by our algorithm calculating ∆R rejecting values of R obtained with close encounters with distances less than 3RH . Even for the extreme situations when e > 0.5 our algorithm is capable to detect quite correctly the limits of the stable borders of the resonance. There is a very good match with Fig. 2 second panel of Lan and Malhotra (2019) where the resonance 8 Tabar´e Gallardo widths were obtained by Poincar sections. Another example is shown in Fig. 3. It is the same resonance but studied in the plane (a, i) for e = 0.6 and ω = 0◦. The map in the left panel was calculated taking initial σ = 300◦ in order to obtain the widest librations. The right panel corresponds to the calculated limits according to our model showing a very good agreement. We have also found a very good agreement between the limits for the resonance 2:5 given by our model and Fig. 3 by Malhotra et al. (2018). Then, the model gives good approximations to the widths of the stable resonant orbits. Nevertheless, in order to represent more exactly the actual limits of the resonances in situations of close encounters, a fine tunning of the algorithm can be done adjusting the tolerance to the close encounters with the planet when calculating ∆R. Retrograde orbits probably can tolerate close encounters up to 2RH while for direct orbits the limit could be shifted to 4RH . The weakest part of this model is assuming that (e, i) are fixed during the librations, assumption that was avoided in the literature since the beginning of the application of semianalytical methods for MMRs because the aim was precisely to find the time evolution of the eccentricity. For this reason this model is unable to describe the time evolution of (e, i) but it is useful for the determination of the resonance widths which by definition are the maximum ∆a of the resonance's domain in the space (a, e, i) for given, fixed, (e, i). We have also applied the model to resonances with Jupiter, where the libra- tions of (e, i) are the largest in the Solar System, and comparing with the widths deduced from dynamical maps we have found an excellent agreement in absence of situations of close encounters. For example, we compared our calculated widths with the ones presented by Lei (2019) for resonances 2:1 and 3:1 with Jupiter for e < 0.5 obtaining a perfect agreement. But, when the eccentricity is large enough to allow close encounters sometimes it is necessary to adjust the criteria of rejec- tion of data from 3RH to even 1RH according to the case. Just for illustration, the total width of the resonance 3:2 with Jupiter for i = 0◦ and e = 0.5 is 0.33 au according to the distance between its separatrices (see for example Nesvorn´y et al. (2002)). But, by means of numerical integrations or dynamical maps it is easy to show that, due to the disruptive close encounters with Jupiter, the width for sta- ble librations is approximately 0.17 au which is the value predicted by our model discarding close encounters to less than 3RH . Nevertheless, in order to reproduce the widths deduced from the dynamical map of figure 7 in Gallardo (2019) corre- sponding to resonance 3:1 with Jupiter for i = 90◦, at very high eccentricities we had to allow close encounters even to less than 1RH in our algorithm, probably because of the large orbital inclination but also because this resonance is extremely strong and can overcome such close encounters. On the other hand, for e < 0.7 the match between the dynamical map and our widths for that resonance is almost perfect in any circumstances. We also reproduced correctly the results shown in figure 8 of Gallardo (2019) because it is a configuration without close encounters (i = ω = 90◦), and the results of figure 17 from Gallardo (2019) allowing encoun- ters as close as 1RH . Then the criterion of 3RH is a general rule but in particular cases it can be revised. A limitation of our model is that it does not take into account the law of structure (Ferraz-Mello, 1988) that relates a0 with e, but this effect is restricted to first order resonances at very low eccentricities. It is originated in the non- , which is typical of near zero eccentricity orbits and that we negligible value of Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 9 Fig. 2 Resonance 1:3 with Neptune. Left: dynamical map showing in color scale the logarithm of ∆a in au as function of the initial (a, e) for test particles with initial i = 0◦. Yellow regions correspond to ∆a > 10 au and blue and black to ∆a < 0.1 au. For 0 < e < 0.68 the initial critical angle was taken σ = 300◦ and for e > 0.68 was taken σ = 0◦. For e > 0.51 there are intersections with Neptune's orbit. The red region, corresponding to ∆a of the order of some au, defines the limits of the stable domain of the resonance. Right: the limits predicted with the model. have ignored assuming constant in Eq. (1). In conclusion, we can say that this model allows to obtain a good approximation of the fundamental properties of MMRs in general in the Solar System. In the next section, applying this model we will present a study of the resonant structure beyond Neptune in three dimensional space, that means, including the orbital inclination of the resonant objects. We will also show the relevance of the argument of the perihelion, ω, for spatial resonances. 3 Properties of the spatial MMRs beyond Neptune 3.1 Libration centers, periods and widths for stable librations It is known that for the planar case all resonances except resonances 1:k have libration centers strictly at σ0 = 0◦ or σ0 = 180◦. Resonances 1:k instead have asymmetric librations, that means libration centers whose positions depend on the orbital eccentricity. Applying our method to the spatial case we found that all resonances can have libration centers widely distributed in the interval 0◦ ≤ σ0 ≤ 360◦ and that for a specific resonance, σ0 depends on the set (e, i, ω). Nevertheless, we have found a very particular situation when ω = N×90◦ being N an integer: for all spatial resonances the equilibrium points present a symmetry with respect to σ = 180◦. In this situation, resonances 1:k exhibit a wide variation in the location of the equilibrium points but preserving the symmetry with respect to σ = 180◦, while for all other resonances the equilibrium points are strictly at σ = 0◦ or 180◦. On the contrary, for ω (cid:54)= N × 90◦ the symmetry is destroyed for all resonances and the equilibrium points can be located in all the interval of σ between 0◦ and 360◦. 10 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 3 Resonance 1:3 with Neptune. Left: dynamical map showing in color scale the logarithm of ∆a in au as function of the initial (a, i) for test particles with itinial e = 0.6 and ω = 0◦. Yellow regions correspond to ∆a > 10 au and blue and black to ∆a < 0.1 au. The initial critical angle was taken σ = 300◦. The red region, corresponding to ∆a of the order of some au, defines the limits of the stable domain of the resonance. Right: the limits predicted with the model. We illustrate these properties with some examples. Fig. 4 shows all the libration centers, periods and widths we have found for resonance 1:2 when assuming ω = 90◦ and varying the eccentricity between 0.02 and 0.96 in steps of 0.02 and the inclination between 0◦ and 180◦ in steps of 5◦. Depending on the values of (e, i) sometimes we found one or two or three stable libration centers and we plotted all them. There is a perfect symmetry with respect to σ = 180◦ and similar situations occur when ω = N × 90◦. Fig. 5 shows the same resonance but imposing ω = 60◦, the symmetry is destroyed and the stable libration centers can be located in all interval between 0◦ and 360◦ depending on (e, i). Fig. 6 shows the case of the resonance 2:3 imposing ω = 60◦. The libration center can be located anywhere in the interval between 0◦ and 360◦, but taking ω = N × 90◦ we obtain libration centers exclusively at 0◦ or 180◦ for this resonance. Then, ω is a crucial parameter for the location of the libration centers in the spatial case. Even more, we have found that the number, location, stability of the equilibrium points as well as the topology of H(a, σ) depend on the set (e, i, ω). To get an idea of the wide variety of resonance properties, a global represen- tation of libration periods and maximum widths for all resonances between 30 and 100 au verifying kp, k ≤ 30 is shown in Fig. 7. All calculations correspond to orbits with arbitrarily chosen e = 0.3 and ω = 90◦, and for each resonance we show the results for three different inclinations: 10◦ with black points, 90◦ in red and 170◦ in violet. For some resonances more than one libration state is possible and all them were plotted. We note that several resonances for the case i = 170◦ with high kp, k close to resonance 1:1 were computed with zero width because of instabilities generated by close encounters with Neptune. For this particular inclination the resonances are in general weaker with the notable exception of res- onances 1:k. Polar resonances (i = 90◦) are sometimes as strong as the resonances for i = 10◦. We tested our predicted libration periods for i = 0◦ with the ones Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 11 Fig. 4 Resonance 1:2. Libration centers, periods (bottom) and maximum widths (top) for stable librations obtained when varying e between 0.02 and 0.96 in steps of 0.02 and i between 0◦ and 180◦ in steps of 5◦ assuming ω = 90◦. The symmetry with respect to σ = 180◦ is preserved. All resonances 1:k exhibit a similar behavior when ω = N × 90◦. given by Lan and Malhotra (2019) in their Fig. 8b and we have found a very good agreement. In our Fig. 7 it is evident that, for a given interval in a, the larger the resonance width the shorter the libration period of the small amplitude librations, which is related to better stability. Libration periods of several Myrs probably are not realistic because they are associated to weak resonances and also because we are not considering the secular effects that are characteristic of the TNR. Reso- nances 1:k marked with a short vertical blue line in Fig. 7 appear the strongest, widest and with the shortest libration periods, independently of their inclinations, when compared with their surrounding resonances. They dynamically dominate because of their larger strength and isolation and their dynamical relevance shapes distribution of the points in Fig. 7. 3.2 The fragility of the spatial resonances In the planar model the strength and width of a given resonance depend just on the orbital eccentricity. In the spatial case they depend on the set of parameters (e, i, ω). While the orbit is librating, (e, i) experience small amplitude oscillations but ω generally circulates or shows large variations in longer timescales. The vari- ations in ω generate changes in the resonance width and topology. If these changes are small, the resonance will not be affected but if they are large eventually the resonance could become weak and the resonant motion may break down. Then, 1000100001000001×106060120180240300360libration period (yr)libration center (deg)0.010.110601201802403003601:2 ω=90libration amplitude (au)libration center (deg)12 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 5 Resonance 1:2. Same as Fig. 4 but assuming ω = 60◦. The symmetry is destroyed. Fig. 6 Same as Fig. 5 but for resonance 2:3 (ω = 60◦). 1000100001000001×106060120180240300360libration period (yr)libration center (deg)0.010.110601201802403003601:2 ω=60libration amplitude (au)libration center (deg)1000100001000001×106060120180240300360libration period (yr)libration center (deg)0.010.110601201802403003602:3 ω=60libration amplitude (au)libration center (deg)Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 13 Fig. 7 Libration periods of the small amplitude oscillations (top) and maximum widths (bot- tom) for all 234 resonances with kp, k ≤ 30 located between 30 and 100 au. Calculations corre- spond to orbits with e = 0.3, ω = 90◦ and for each resonance three different orbital inclinations were considered: 10◦, 90◦ and 170◦ represented with black, red and violet points respectively. From left to right, location of resonances 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5 and 1:6 are represented by short blue vertical lines. for the spatial resonances we introduce a new concept, that we will call resonance fragility, and that we define it as the dimensionless parameter f (e, i) = (∆amax − ∆amin)/∆amin (19) where ∆amax, ∆amin are the maximum and minimum total resonance widths of stable librations obtained when varying ω for fixed (e, i). A fragility equal to 0 means that there is no fragility, the resonance's width is invariable with ω and the resonance can be considered stable in the sense that changes in its properties cannot be expected. A resonance with fragility f can change its width by a factor of f + 1, so it is an indication of instability. Then, for a given resonance, f is a function depending on (e, i) and we could have regions of the plane (e, i) with high fragility. These regions indicate the values (e, i) for which the resonant motion is more vulnerable, or fragile, and the least probable regions capable of sustain a resonant population for long time scales. In Figs. 8 to 15 we illustrate with some resonances that have been considered since the study of the dynamics of the TNR began ordered in increasing values of semimajor axes. In the left panels, on a grid of (e, i), we show the maximum widths of stable librations in au calculated 14 Tabar´e Gallardo when varying ω from 0◦ to 90◦ (∆R is π-periodic in ω and symmetric respect to ω = 90◦) in steps of 5◦ and in the right panels the corresponding fragility f according to Eq. (19). The same scale for ∆amax was used in all figures in order to an easy comparison between them and the same scale was used in all figures for f . For low inclination orbits, say i < 10◦, the fragility is in general very low but for higher inclinations some resonances show increasing fragility. We have found that high fragility is associated with changes in the stability of the equilibrium points. Although high fragility is associated with lower resonance widths we have found that the fragility mostly depends on the type of the resonance. Resonances 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 show larger widths in au and these are the resonances which exhibit lower fragility. More precisely, examining the figures it is evident that for a generic resonance kp:k the larger the value of kp the larger the fragility of the resonance being 7:9, 4:7 and 3:5 the most fragile of the resonances shown and in that order. Then, resonances 1:k (kp = 1) are the widest and the more robust, followed by 2:k (kp = 2). The polar resonant object 471325 (2011 KT19) is evolving in the region .28 < e < .48 and i ∼ 112◦ of resonance 7:9 (Morais and Namouni, 2017) where according to Fig. 9 the fragility is large, more precisely it varies from 2 to 6. It is a very fragile region and in fact the object leaves the resonance after some Myrs. We have not studied experimentally the effect of f in a population of resonant objects, but if we imagine that N resonant objects are uniformly distributed along the domain of the resonance, we can guess that a resonance with fragility f could loss its members until reduced to N/(f +1). On the other hand, an object observed evolving inside a region of high fragility must be a survivor of an originally larger population. That could be the case for 471325 (2011 KT19). Gallardo et al. (2012) and Saillenfest et al. (2016, 2017) studied the long term dynamical evolution of resonant motions due to the Lidov-Kozai mechanism where large changes in (e, i) take place along with variations of ω. In these cases, the resonances also have large variations in their behavior and strength, including notable changes in their topology. Our definition of fragility only takes into account the variations generated by ω, independently of the secular mechanism affecting (e, i) of the objects. Fragility is an intrinsic property of the resonance and is defined by the values of (e, i). Nevertheless, if we know the long term time evolution of (e, i), we can follow the evolution of the resonant motion in terms of width and fragility. For example, if the object is evolving towards a region of high fragility in the plane (e, i) the resonance could break, and on the other hand, if it is evolving towards a region of low fragility the resonance will be guaranteed. 3.3 Atlas of resonances from 30 to 100 au To have a general panorama of the resonances beyond Neptune we show in Fig. 16 the classic picture of resonance's widths as function of the eccentricity but calculated for i = 10◦ and ω = 90◦ for all resonances with Neptune with kp ≤ 20 and k ≤ 20 . The darkest regions are due to the superposition of resonances. In the planar theory, when the perihelion q = a(1 − e) verify q ≤ aN the intersection of orbits is unavoidable and collisions take place unless the critical angle is limited to safe values. In the spatial case instead, as is the case of Fig. 16, if we assume that the planet has a zero eccentricity and zero inclination orbit, the condition for Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 15 Fig. 8 Resonance 1:1 at a = 30.1 au. Left: maximum width in color code from 0 to 1.2 au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility in color code from 0 to 4. Yellow regions represent very high fragility regions with f ≥ 4. Fig. 9 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 7:9 at a = 35.6 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. Fig. 10 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 2:3 at a = 39.5 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. 16 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 11 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 3:5 at a = 42.3 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. Fig. 12 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 4:7 at a = 43.7 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. Fig. 13 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 1:2 at a = 47.8 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 17 Fig. 14 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 2:5 at a = 55.5 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. Fig. 15 Same as Fig. 8 for resonance 1:3 at a = 62.6 au. Left: maximum width in au obtained varying ω. Right: fragility. intersection of orbits is given by a(1 − e2) 1 ± e cos ω = ap (20) where ap is the semimajor axis of the planet, Neptune in this case (ap = aN ). This collision curve, e(a) for ω = 90◦, and the curve given by q = aN (which defines the critical eccentricity ec) are shown in Fig. 16 . The last one is associated to regions in the plane (a, e) where resonances are wider and, on the contrary, the collision curve is associated to regions where resonances shrink due to the restrictions to the values of σ imposed by the close encounters with Neptune. Note the domain and isolation of resonances 1:k (including 1:1) and in a lesser extent resonances 2:k. Note also the superposition of resonances for a < 34 au which it is known to be a chaotic region (Levison and Duncan, 1993). Our widths are in very good agreement with the results presented in Fig. 1 by Lan and Malhotra (2019) for the planar case. To illustrate the inclination effect we show in Fig. 17 the same resonances of Fig. 16 but calculated for i = 70◦. For very low eccentricities they are wider than 18 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 16 Resonance widths for all the 93 resonances with Neptune between 30 and 70 au verifying k ≤ 20 and kp ≤ 20 calculated with i = 10◦ and ω = 90◦. Collision curve from Eq. (20) and the curve corresponding to q = aN are shown. Resonances 1:k are strong and isolated from their neighbors. in the case of i = 10◦ but globally, considering all the interval of eccentricities, they become narrower avoiding their superposition. Resonances 1:k and 2:k continue to dominate. In Fig. 18 we show the panorama for i = 150◦. In this case, resonances 1:k and 2:k persist and the others present some predominance only close to the collision curve. We illustrate with more detail the effect of the orbital inclination on the resonance width in Fig. 19 for the case of resonance 1:2 for three extreme values of inclination. The orbital inclination (and also ω) changes completely the resonance domain in (a, e). A very interesting effect appears for high inclination resonances that can be observed in Figs. 17 and 18: they are wider close to the collision curve. We checked this behavior with dynamical maps confirming the predictions of our model. Then, high inclination non resonant objects in collision routes could be trapped by weak resonances which are abnormally wide for that particular eccentricities. Going further, Fig. 20 shows the distribution of resonances between 70 and 100 au calculated as in Fig. 16 but up to kp = 40 and k = 40. Again, resonances 1:k show up strong and isolated. Finally, resonances with Uranus are shown in Fig. 21. In this case only orbits below the curve q = aN can survive in long timescales. At these low eccentricities, resonances with Uranus are weak so not very much objects can evolve in these resonances. Nevertheless, their imprint can appear in dynamical maps for example, as we will show later. 3.4 On the existence of high kp:k resonances One may guess that the isolation of resonances 1:k shown in the preceding figures is only apparent and due to the limits imposed to kp, k. Probably, going to greater kp and k, resonances 1:k will be surrounded with closer resonances as is the case of resonances 2:k (see Fig. 16 for example). In order to study this point we calculated Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 19 Fig. 17 Same as Fig. 16 but calculated for i = 70◦ and ω = 90◦. Resonances 1:k are still strong and isolated. Fig. 18 Same as Fig. 16 but calculated for i = 150◦ and ω = 90◦. Resonances 1:k and 2:k dominate. the resonances approaching the resonance 1:2 from the left and right sides up to kp, k = 40 and Fig. 22 shows the result. Note the sinusoidal-like variations of the widths conforming the eccentricity increases. They are related to successive changes in the stability of the equilibrium points or to the alternation between the location of the principal and the secondary minimum of R. A similar behavior is shown in figure 1 by Lan and Malhotra (2019). Fig. 22 shows that the resonance 1:2 is now more threatened by weak neighbor resonances but the doubt persists: is it in fact isolated? Are these high kp:k resonances real? To solve the point we appeal to dynamical maps. We integrated the Sun with the giant planets in its present orbits but assuming i = 0◦ for all of them and 80000 particles with initial 45.5 < a < 48.5 au, 0 < e < 0.8 and all them with 20 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 19 Resonance widths for resonance 1:2 computed for three different inclinations i = 10◦, 90◦ and 170◦ assuming ω = 90◦. The collision eccentricity with Neptune deduced from Eq. (20) is indicated with arrows. Fig. 20 Resonance widths for the 60 resonances with Neptune between 70 and 100 au verifying k ≤ 40 and kp ≤ 40 calculated for i = 10◦ and ω = 90◦. the same initial Ω = 0◦, ω = 90◦, i = 10◦ and mean anomaly M = 45◦. Each particle is integrated by 200 orbital periods and the detected changes in baricentric a are plotted in logarithmic scale. Fig. 23 shows the resulting map. Large ∆a (in yellow) are due to close encounters or highly chaotic evolutions. Very small ∆a (in black and blue) are due to secular evolutions. Regular structures inside the secular or chaotic regions are due to oscillations in a due to resonances. The domain of the resonance 1:2 is clear and their limits are neatly defined. The yellow fuzzy horizontal band is generated by intersections and to close encounters with Neptune and Uranus. For particles with orbits coplanar with the planets, all the region above the line defined by q = aN (that is e > 0.36) would be yellow. Particles with eccentricities close to the collision bands defined by Uranus and Neptune are unstable because their circulating ω eventually will take a value close to the one given by Eq. (20) corresponding to a collision with one of the planets. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 47 47.2 47.4 47.6 47.8 48 48.2 48.4 48.6i=10i=90i=170ω =90ea (au)Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 21 Fig. 21 Resonances with Uranus calculated for i = 10◦ and ω = 90◦. Only orbits with eccentricity below the curve q = aN are stable. Fig. 22 Detail of Fig. 16 showing the region close to resonance 1:2 considering all resonances with k ≤ 40 and kp ≤ 40. Darker regions correspond to superposition of resonances. The initial conditions were taken so that initial σ ∼ 280◦ for the resonance 1:2 which guarantees large amplitude librations and maximum resonance widths in the dynamical map. But for eccentricities close to the collision curve this initial condition produces close encounters with Neptune disrupting the resonance. That is why the resonance does not persist close to the collision curve. What we want to stress is that there are several resonances at the left of the resonance 1:2 but they do not affect the limits of the resonance. Below the yellow unstable band we can identify traces of the resonances up to a ∼ 46.7 au corresponding to resonance 15:29. We show a zoom of this region at Fig. 24. Between this resonance and resonance 1:2 there is no dominant resonant structures and they do not affect the borders of resonance 1:2. Note that, at the right of the 22 Tabar´e Gallardo resonance 1:2 in Fig. 23, it is possibly to distinguish a ghostly pattern due to the resonance 1:4 with Uranus. Above the yellow band, the continuous chaotic region is due to close encounters with the planets mostly, not to superposition of resonances. We have also calculated dynamical maps extending the integration time and no new resonances show up. We also obtained dynamical maps for polar orbits of i = 90◦ that show a very rich resonant structure between the collision lines with Neptune and Uranus but no invading resonances appear close to resonance 1:2. We can understand why this resonance is isolated noting that the nearest resonances are those with large kp, k which means that they are weak but funda- mentally that for the dynamical start-up of the resonances it is necessary a large number of orbital revolutions dropping the efficiency of the resonant mechanism. The resonant mechanism works because there is a sequence of perturbations by Neptune that is repeated after kp revolutions of the particle. During that time interval both objects, planet and TNO, cannot change very much their orbits oth- erwise the sequence of perturbations will be broken and the resonance cannot be installed. The greater the number of perihelion passages, kp, that the TNO must complete the greater the probability that its orbit change due to the cumulative effect of planetary perturbations. We can guess that this situation of isolation of resonance 1:2 is analogue for the other 1:k resonances because their potentially threatening resonances are also those with large kp and k values. Therefore, it is reasonable that there are some maximum values for kp, k so that the real reso- nances can work. In the specific case of the resonance 1:2, the closest resonance with some, though tiny, dynamical traces seems to be 15:29. Yu et al. (2018) performed numerical integrations of particles with 30 < a < 100 au looking for captures in MMRs and they obtained a very illustrative map of captures for res- onances kp:k (q:p using their notation) that shows that the efficiency of captures drops substantially for kp > 13 in very good agreement with our results. It is worth mentioning that Chambers (1997) studied the credibility of exterior MMRs with Jupiter and concluded that for high k/kp ratios the binding energies of the comets to the Sun are not large enough to overcome the planetary perturbations and the resonances cannot work. Our case is different, it is not a problem of low binding energy (all orbits have a ∼ 47 au in the case of resonance 1:2) but of the large number of orbital revolutions that the TNO needs to complete in order to set up the resonant mechanism. Remember that we have also showed that for large kp the fragility of the resonance is large. Then, although in this work we have not investigated the problem in depth, there are enough evidence indicating there is a maximum limit for kp (close to ∼ 14) in the TNR so that a resonance can be installed. 4 Six resonant populations of TNOs Using the orbital elements obtained from AstDyS1 by june 2019 we performed numerical integrations using EVORB (Fern´andez et al., 2002) of the four giant planets plus the TNOs with semimajor axes close to the resonances 1:1, 2:3, 3:5, 4:7, 1:2 and 2:5. We automatically analyzed the output of the first 105 years search- ing for librations of the corresponding critical angles. The automatic detection is 1 newton.spacedys.com/astdys Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 23 Fig. 23 Dynamical map for the resonance 1:2 and its neighborhood obtained integrating the Sun, the giant planets in coplanar orbits with initial λN ∼ 0◦ and massless test particles during 200 orbital periods with i = 10◦ and initial ω = 90◦, Ω = 0◦ and M = 95◦ (σ1:2 = 280◦). Horizontal and vertical axis are the initial baricentric semimajor axis and eccentricity respectively. The logarithmic color scale shows maximum detected variations in baricentric a in au. Compare with Fig. 22. High kp:k weak resonances with Neptune are present at the left and the region defined by the rectangle is augmented in Fig. 24. The resonance 1:4 with Uranus appears at the right side at a ∼ 48.4 au. Fig. 24 Zoom of the rectangle of Fig. 23 showing from left to right with fading intensity the resonances 10:19 at a ∼ 46.13 au, 11:21, 12:23, 13:25, 14:27 and 15:29 at a ∼ 46.65 au. based on a statistical analysis of the critical angle. If the distribution of the calcu- lated σ is approximately uniform between 0◦ and 360◦ we discard the possibility of being a resonant TNO. But, if there is an obvious concentration in some interval and its semimajor axis is inside the limits of the resonance we consider the object as resonant. In cases that are not very conclusive we checked its status by direct inspection. We identified 652 TNOs evolving in these resonances. 24 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 25 shows the 6 populations of resonant objects inside level curves of maxi- mum widths for each resonance. The level curves are the same that can be deduced from the corresponding Figs. 8 to 14. These are the maximum widths correspond- ing to stable librations obtained when varying ω between 0◦ and 90◦. Maximum widths in the plane (e, i) for low inclination orbits corresponds to orbits with q ∼ aN , that means e ∼ ec. Then it is natural that the populations tend to concentrate close to the maximum width regions but below that eccentricities, avoiding collisions with Neptune. All populations are nearly concentrated close to the region (e, i) where the maximum width are located with the notable excep- tion of population 4:7 and in a lesser extent also 3:5. These populations appear shifted to the left, to lower eccentricities in comparison with the other popula- tions. Lykawka and Mukai (2005) studied the 4:7 resonance and found that the most stable region is approximately defined by 0.25 < e < 0.3 in good agreement with the location of the region corresponding to maximum widths we show in Fig. 25. Nevertheless, the mean eccentricity for the 4:7 population is 0.14, well below the most stable region. Fig. 26 shows the six population along with level curves of fragility. In general each population is inside regions of f < 0.5 and far from the region of f = 1 repre- sented by red lines with the exception, again, of the populations 3:5 and 4:7 which are shifted to lower eccentricities, to regions of larger fragility. We have calculated an atlas of resonances near the resonance 4:7 and going up to values of kp, k ≤ 40 we find resonances that invade both borders of the resonance. But, by means of dynamical maps we verified that these threatening resonances in fact do not exist because of their impossibility to be installed, as in the case of the resonance 1:2 that we have studied. Then it is not clear for us whether the anomalous low eccen- tricities in the 3:5 and 4:7 resonant populations are generated by the resonances themselves, by secular effects inside the resonances or by cosmogonic reasons. 5 Summary We have developed a simple model for the calculation of librations centers, periods and widths of arbitrary MMRs with a planet in circular orbit with no restrictions about the orbital elements of the small body. No series developments are necessary and we provide a code to calculate the resonance's properties. For the calculation of the maximum widths we follow the idea of stable librations. For its computation we adopt the criteria of rejecting perturbations generated at planetocentric distances lower than 3RH . The obtained widths are in good agreement with results from numerical integrations and from other authors. We have not investigated in deep the reasons why the resonances become unstable at the borders for some regions in the space (e, i), but we have found several cases of low kp:k resonances in the TNR where the instability is caused by encounters with the planet, not due to the superposition of resonances. We showed the relevance of ω in defining the properties of the resonances, like the location of the libration centers and the resonance widths. Considering the time variation of ω, we introduce the concept of fragility of the resonances which is a measure of how much the resonance width can change while varying ω but preserving (e, i). The fragility is irrelevant for zero inclination or zero eccentricity orbits, but in other cases is important and we showed that in the TNR for reso- Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 25 Fig. 25 Six populations of resonant objects represented by black dots accompanied with level curves of maximum widths in au in steps of 0.1 au. The location corresponding to the maximum width in all the space considered is indicated by a red cross. nances with greater kp the corresponding fragilities are greater. A resonance with high fragility in some region of (e, i) will not be able to sustain resonant TNOs for long time scales in that region. The model allowed us to present a very complete atlas of resonances beyond Neptune that shows that resonances 1:k and 2:k are the strongest and most isolated ones even for polar and retrograde orbits, confirming the findings of other previous studies (Gallardo, 2006; Lykawka and Mukai, 2007; Yu et al., 2018; Gallardo, 2019; Lan and Malhotra, 2019, for example). Their isolation is related to the impossibility that the neighbor high kp:k resonances can be installed. These high kp:k resonances, probably partially overlapping each other, only exist in theory. We also found that high inclination resonances become wider near the collision curve, a fact that could facilitate the capture in resonance for high inclination objects. 26 Tabar´e Gallardo Fig. 26 Same populations of Fig. 25 but showing the resonances' fragility. Black level curves indicate f = 0.5 and red level curves f = 1. All shown region of resonance 1:1 has f < 0.5. We studied six resonant populations of TNOs and we found that in general these populations tends to concentrate in the region of the plane (e, i) where the resonance widths are larger and the resonances less fragile. But there is a notable exception which is the population inside the resonance 4:7 which is clearly shifted to lower eccentricities. In a lesser extent the resonance 3:5 shows a similar behavior. We do not have an explanation for this particular behavior of these resonances. All evidence points to resonances 1:k and 2:k as the strongest, widest, less fragile and more isolated resonances in the TNR for all interval of inclinations and eccentricities. The evidence also points to a limit vale of kp, may be 14, so that a resonance can be installed in the TNR. Acknowledgements The author acknowledges the work of the reviewers. Support from PEDECIBA and SNI are also acknowledged. Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 27 Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. References Beaug´e C (1996) On a Global Expansion of the Disturbing Function in the Planar Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 64(4):313 -- 350 Carusi A, Kresak L, Perozzi E, Valsecchi GB (1986) Some general features of the dynamics of Halley-type comets. ESLAB Symposium on the Exploration of Halley's Comet 250:413 -- 418 Chambers J (1997) Why Halley-Types Resonate but Long-Period Comets Don't: A Dynamical Distinction between Short- and Long-Period Comets. Icarus 125(1):32 -- 38, DOI 10.1006/icar.1996.5567 Duncan MJ, Levison HF, Budd SM (1995) The Dynamical Structure of the Kuiper Belt. The Astronomical Journal 110:3073, DOI 10.1086/117748 Ellis KM, Murray CD (2000) The Disturbing Function in Solar System Dynamics. Icarus 147:129 -- 144, DOI 10.1006/icar.2000.6399 Emelyanenko VV (1985) Comet resonances with Jupiter. Pisma v Astronomich- eskii Zhurnal 11:924 -- 929 Fern´andez JA, Gallardo T, Brunini A (2002) Are There Many Inactive Jupiter- Family Comets among the Near-Earth Asteroid Population? Icarus 159(2):358 -- 368, DOI 10.1006/icar.2002.6903, URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0019103502969034 Ferraz-Mello S (1988) The High-Eccentricity Libration of the Hildas. Astronomical Journal 96:400, DOI 10.1086/114819 Ferraz-Mello S, Sato M (1989) The very-high-eccentricity asymmetric expansion of the disturbing function near resonances of any order. Astronomy and Astro- physics 225:541 -- 547 Gallardo T (2006) Atlas of the mean motion resonances in the Solar System. Icarus 184:29 -- 38, DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.04.001 Gallardo T (2019) Strength, stability and three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances in the solar system. Icarus 317:121 -- 134, DOI 10.1016/j.icarus. 2018.07.002, 1807.07956 Gallardo T, Ferraz-Mello S (1995) The high-eccentricity libration theory revisited. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 62(2):145 -- 165, DOI 10.1007/ BF00692084 Gallardo T, Hugo G, Pais P (2012) Survey of Kozai dynamics beyond Neptune. Icarus 220:392 -- 403, DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.05.025, 1205.4935 Lan L, Malhotra R (2019) Neptune's resonances in the Scattered Disk pp 1 -- 20, URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06040, 1901.06040 Lei H (2019) Three-dimensional phase structures of mean motion resonances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487(2):2097 -- 2116, DOI 10.1093/mnras/stz1422 Levison HF, Duncan MJ (1993) The Gravitational Sculpting of the Kuiper Belt. Astrophysical Journal Letters 406:L35, DOI 10.1086/186780 28 Tabar´e Gallardo Lykawka PS, Mukai T (2005) Exploring the 7:4 mean motion resonance - I: Dynam- ical evolution of classical transneptunian objects. Planetary and Space Science 53(11):1175 -- 1187, DOI 10.1016/j.pss.2004.12.015 Lykawka PS, Mukai T (2007) Resonance sticking in the scattered disk. Icarus 192:238 -- 247, DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.06.007, 0707.4301 Malhotra R (1996) The Phase Space Structure Near Neptune Resonances in the Kuiper Belt. Astronomical Journal 111:504, DOI 10.1086/117802, astro-ph/ 9509141 Malhotra R, Lan L, Volk K, Wang X (2018) Neptune's 5:2 Resonance in the Kuiper Belt. The Astronomical Journal 156(2):55, DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/aac9c3, 1804.01209 Melita MD, Brunini A (2000) Comparative Study of Mean-Motion Resonances in the Trans-Neptunian Region. Icarus 147(1):205 -- 219, DOI 10.1006/icar.2000. 6414 Moons M, Morbidelli A (1993) The main mean motion commensurabilities in the planar circular and elliptic problem. Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astron- omy 57(1-2):99 -- 108, DOI 10.1007/BF00692465 Morais MHM, Giuppone CA (2012) Stability of prograde and retrograde planets in circular binary systems. MNRAS 424:52 -- 64, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012. 21151.x, 1204.4718 Morais MHM, Namouni F (2013a) Asteroids in retrograde resonance with Jupiter and Saturn. MNRAS 436:L30 -- L34, DOI 10.1093/mnrasl/slt106, 1308.0216 Morais MHM, Namouni F (2013b) Retrograde resonance in the planar three-body problem. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 117:405 -- 421, DOI 10.1007/s10569-013-9519-2, 1305.0016 Morais MHM, Namouni F (2016) A numerical investigation of coorbital stability and libration in three dimensions. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astron- omy 125:91 -- 106, DOI 10.1007/s10569-016-9674-3, 1602.04755 Morais MHM, Namouni F (2017) First trans-Neptunian object in polar resonance with Neptune. MNRAS 472:L1 -- L4, DOI 10.1093/mnrasl/slx125, 1708.00346 Morbidelli A, Thomas F, Moons M (1995) The Resonant Structure of the Kuiper Belt and the Dynamics of the First Five Trans-Neptunian Objects. Icarus 118(2):322 -- 340, DOI 10.1006/icar.1995.1194 Namouni F, Morais MHM (2015) Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination. MN- RAS 446:1998 -- 2009, DOI 10.1093/mnras/stu2199, 1410.5383 Namouni F, Morais MHM (2017a) Resonance capture at arbitrary inclination - II. Effect of the radial drift rate. MNRAS 467:2673 -- 2683, DOI 10.1093/mnras/ stx290, 1702.00236 Namouni F, Morais MHM (2017b) The disturbing function for polar Centaurs and transneptunian objects. MNRAS 471:2097 -- 2110, DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx1714, 1707.02431 Namouni F, Morais MHM (2018) The disturbing function for asteroids with ar- bitrary inclinations. MNRAS 474:157 -- 176, DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx2636, 1710. 03902 Nesvorn´y D, Ferraz-Mello S, Holman M, Morbidelli A (2002) Regular and Chaotic Dynamics in the Mean-Motion Resonances: Implications for the Structure and Evolution of the Asteroid Belt. Asteroids III pp 379 -- 394 Roig F, Simula A, Ferraz-Mello S, Tsuchida M (1998) The high-eccentricity asym- metric expansion of the disturbing function for non-planar resonant problems. Three dimensional structure of mean motion resonances beyond Neptune 29 Astronomy and Astrophysics 329:339 -- 349 Saillenfest M, Fouchard M, Tommei G, Valsecchi GB (2016) Long-term dynamics beyond Neptune: secular models to study the regular motions. Celestial Mechan- ics and Dynamical Astronomy 126:369 -- 403, DOI 10.1007/s10569-016-9700-5, 1611.04457 Saillenfest M, Fouchard M, Tommei G, Valsecchi GB (2017) Study and application of the resonant secular dynamics beyond Neptune. Celestial Mechanics and Dy- namical Astronomy 127:477 -- 504, DOI 10.1007/s10569-016-9735-7, 1611.04480 Schubart J (1964) Long-Period Effects in Nearly Commensurable Cases of the Restricted Three-Body Problem. SAO Special Report 149 Voyatzis G, Tsiganis K, Antoniadou KI (2018) Inclined asymmetric librations in exterior resonances. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 130(4):29, DOI 10.1007/s10569-018-9821-0, 1803.00538 Yu TYM, Murray-Clay R, Volk K (2018) Trans-Neptunian Objects Transiently Stuck in Neptune's Mean Motion Resonances: Numerical simulations of the cur- rent population. The Astronomical Journal 156(1):33, DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ aac6cd
1006.1660	2	1006	2010-08-24T15:55:15	Atmosphere and Spectral Models of the Kepler-Field Planets HAT-P-7b and TrES-2	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	We develop atmosphere models of two of the three Kepler-field planets that were known prior to the start of the Kepler mission (HAT-P-7b and TrES-2). We find that published Kepler and Spitzer data for HAT-P-7b appear to require an extremely hot upper atmosphere on the dayside, with a strong thermal inversion and little day-night redistribution. The Spitzer data for TrES-2 suggest a mild thermal inversion with moderate day-night redistribution. We examine the effect of nonequilibrium chemistry on TrES-2 model atmospheres and find that methane levels must be adjusted by extreme amounts in order to cause even mild changes in atmospheric structure and emergent spectra. Our best-fit models to the Spitzer data for TrES-2 lead us to predict a low secondary eclipse planet-star flux ratio (~2 x 10^-5) in the Kepler bandpass, which is consistent with what very recent observations have found. Finally, we consider how the Kepler-band optical flux from a hot exoplanet depends on the strength of a possible extra optical absorber in the upper atmosphere. We find that the optical flux is not monotonic in optical opacity, and the non-monotonicity is greater for brighter, hotter stars.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version November 8, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 04/20/08 ATMOSPHERE AND SPECTRAL MODELS OF THE KEPLER-FIELD PLANETS HAT-P-7b AND TRES-2 1Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 and 2Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030 David S. Spiegel1,2, Adam Burrows1,2 Draft version November 8, 2018 ABSTRACT We develop atmosphere models of two of the three Kepler-field planets that were known prior to the start of the Kepler mission (HAT-P-7b and TrES-2). We find that published Ke- pler and Spitzer data for HAT-P-7b appear to require an extremely hot upper atmosphere on the dayside, with a strong thermal inversion and little day-night redistribution. The Spitzer data for TrES-2 suggest a mild thermal inversion with moderate day-night redistribution. We examine the effect of nonequilibrium chemistry on TrES-2 model atmospheres and find that methane levels must be adjusted by extreme amounts in order to cause even mild changes in atmospheric structure and emergent spectra. Our best-fit models to the Spitzer data for TrES-2 lead us to predict a low secondary eclipse planet-star flux ratio ( ∼< 2×10−5) in the Kepler bandpass, which is consistent with what very recent observations have found. Finally, we consider how the Kepler-band optical flux from a hot exoplanet depends on the strength of a possible extra optical absorber in the upper atmosphere. We find that the optical flux is not monotonic in optical opacity, and the non-monotonicity is greater for brighter, hotter stars. Subject headings: planetary systems -- radiative transfer -- stars: individual HAT-P-7, TrES-2 1. INTRODUCTION Extrasolar planets are being discovered at an increasingly rapid pace: roughly a quarter of the currently known exoplanets (numbering more than 450, as of June, 2010) were found since the begin- ning of 2009.1 Still, only ∼80 of the known planets have been seen to transit their parent stars. Tran- sits break the degeneracy between mass and incli- nation, they allow direct measurement of planetary radii, and they make possible precise measurements of planetary fluxes from secondary eclipse observa- tions. The Kepler mission, which is predicted to find many new transiting planets, is, therefore, par- ticularly exciting. Three transiting planets in the Kepler field were identified prior to the beginning of the Kepler mis- sion -- TrES-2, HAT-P-7b, and HAT-P-11b (occa- sionally referred to as Kepler-1b, -2b, and -3b). Spiegel et al. (2010) have already published a range of possible atmospheric models of HAT-P-11b; here, we consider HAT-P-7b and and TrES-2. The InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) instrument on the Spitzer Space Telescope has been a boon to exoplanetary science, providing observations that are diagnostic of atmospheric temperature and com- Electronic address: [email protected], catalogs See 1 the http://www.exoplanets.org. [email protected], bur- at http://exoplanet.eu and position for more than a dozen planets. It had four photometric channels, centered at 3.6 µm, 4.5 µm, 5.8 µm, and 8.0 µm. Recently, Christiansen et al. (2010) and O'Donovan et al. (2010) used IRAC to measure infrared fluxes from HAT-P-7b and TrES- 2, respectively. HAT-P-7b, discovered by P´al et al. (2008), orbits a large, hot star (1.84R⊙, spectral type F8). It is one of the most highly irradiated known explanets, with a substellar flux of ∼4.8 × 109 erg cm−2 s−1. Its orbit is significantly misaligned from the stellar spin vector, indicating a possible third body in the system (Winn et al. 2009; Narita et al. 2009). It is a particularly interesting object in part because Kepler's exquisite photometry has allowed measure- ment of ellipsoidal variations in the star induced by the planet's tidal field (Welsh et al. 2010). TrES- 2, by contrast, orbits a nearly solar-type star in a nearly grazing orbit (O'Donovan et al. 2006; Hol- man et al. 2007; Sozzetti et al. 2007; Raetz et al. 2009). Mislis & Schmitt (2009) find a reduction in transit duration of ∼3 minutes since 2006, and at- tribute this shortening to a change in inclination, although analysis by Rabus et al. (2009) does not corroborate such a large change. The atmosphere modeling strategy that we em- ploy here differs from several others that have been used. Similar to Barman et al. (2005) and Fort- ney et al. (2006), we calculate radiative equilib- rium, chemical equlibrium models. In contrast, 2 both Madhusudhan & Seager (2009) and Tinetti et al. (2005, 2007) adjust both chemistry and ther- mal structure in order to find a best fit to the avail- able data, eschewing equilibrium solutions. This latter method produces chemical and thermal pro- files that are not the result of ab initio calcula- tions, but that might reveal non-equilibrium behav- ior. Yet another approach is taken by Showman et al. (2009) and Burrows et al. (2010), who sim- ulate three dimensional structure and dynamics in planetary atmospheres; so far this more sophisti- cated approach has not produced better fits to ob- servations than the one-dimensional radiative mod- els described above. Hubeny et al. (2003) were the first to suggest that an extra optical absorber in a hot exoplanet's upper atmosphere could lead to a thermal inver- sion. Observations seem to suggest such inversions (Hubeny et al. 2003; Fortney et al. 2006, 2008; Bur- rows et al. 2007, 2008a; Richardson et al. 2007; Spiegel et al. 2009; Madhusudhan & Seager 2009; Knutson et al. 2008, 2010), and the strong opti- cal absorber titanium oxide (TiO) has frequently been suggested as the possible culprit responsible for the inferred inversions. However, in the absence of strong mixing processes, the molecular weight of TiO would tend to make it settle to the bot- tom of the atmosphere. Furthermore, cold traps on the nightside and below the hot upper atmo- sphere on the dayside can cause TiO to condense into solid grains, which necessitates even stronger macroscopic mixing to keep TiO aloft in the radia- tively important upper atmosphere. Since the pho- tospheres are above the radiative-convective bound- aries, they are stably stratified; it is not obvious whether such strong mixing obtains in such a stable region (Spiegel et al. 2009). Various authors have tried to estimate the amount of macroscopic mixing and have found that, in some regions of the day-side atmosphere, the mixing might be vigorous enough to maintain TiO at altitude (Showman et al. 2009; Li & Goodman 2010; Madhusudhan & Seager 2010), though Youdin & Mitchell (2010) point out that tur- bulent diffusivity in excess of 107 cm2 s−1 might lead to overinflation of some planets through downward transport of entropy. Zahnle et al. (2009) suggest that sulfur photochemistry provides another avenue for achieving the additional upper-atmosphere op- tical opacity that is needed to produce hot upper atmospheres and inversions. Knutson et al. (2010) find that the presence of thermal inversions appears to be inversely related to the host stars' ultraviolet (UV) activity, raising the possibility that strong in- cident UV destroys molecules that may be responsi- ble for thermal inversions. Here, we remain agnostic on the matter and include, for modeling purposes, an extra source of optical opacity of as-yet unknown origin. This paper is structured as follows. In §2, we describe our 1D atmosphere modeling strategy. In §3 and §4, we present our models of HAT-P-7b and TrES-2. We point out the effects that scattering and nonequilibrium chemistry could have on our models. In §5, we discuss the non-monotonic relationship be- tween the optical opacity in a planet's upper atmo- sphere and the planet's optical emergent radiation. Finally, in §6, we conclude, and in an Appendix, we discuss the various methods used in the literature to represent day-night redistribution in this modeling context. 2. ATMOSPHERE MODELING As in our other recent studies, we use the code COOLTLUSTY (Hubeny et al. 2003; Sudarsky et al. 2003; Burrows et al. 2006, 2008a; Spiegel et al. 2009, 2010), a variant of the code TLUSTY (Hubeny 1988; Hubeny & Lanz 1995), to calculate radiative equi- librium irradiated atmosphere models. Our atomic and molecular opacities are generally calculated as- suming chemical equilibrium with solar elemental abundances (Sharp & Burrows 2007; Burrows & Sharp 1999; Burrows et al. 2001, 2002, 2005), al- though we also calculate a few nonequilibrium mod- els, described in §4. The irradiating spectra in our models are taken from Kurucz (1979, 1994, 2005), interpolated to the effective temperatures and sur- face gravities of HAT-P-7 and the host star of TrES- 2. In addition to the observationally measured pa- rameters of our models (orbital semimajor axis, planet and stellar radii, planet and stellar surface gravities, stellar effective temperature), and in ad- dition to calculating equilibrium chemistry and ra- diative transfer, several other physical processes go into our models. These include Rayleigh scatter- ing (Sudarsky et al. 2000; L´opez-Morales & Seager 2007; Burrows et al. 2008b; Rowe et al. 2008), heat redistribution, and the possible presence of an extra optical absorber that could explain the hot upper atmospheres and thermal inversions that have been inferred from infrared observations of several tran- siting planets. In particular, there are two key free parameters that we vary: Pn and κ′. • Pn quantifies the efficiency of day-to-night heat redistribution, and is equal to the frac- tion of incident day-side heating that is reradi- ated from the nightside (Burrows et al. 2006, 2008a). In the models in this paper, the re- distribution takes place between 0.01 and 0.1 bars. • κ′ is an ad hoc extra source of optical ab- sorption opacity in the upper atmosphere, and is motivated by the thermal inversions that have been inferred from the infrared spectra of many exoplanets. κ′ is similar to the κe of some of our recent work (e.g., Burrows et al. 2008a), except that, rather than a gray op- tical absorber, it has the same parabolic de- pendence on frequency as the corresponding extra absorber in Lopez-Morales et al. (2009) and Burrows et al. (2010). The models whose properties are plotted in Figs. 1 -- 3 are summarized in Table 1. In addition to these, we also calculate several models with a modification to the code that allows an ad hoc extra source of optical scattering opacity, analogous to κ′, but for scattering instead of absorption. 3. HAT-P-7b HAT-P-7b is a 1.78MJ, 1.36RJ planet in an approximately circular orbit 0.0377 AU from the 1.47 M⊙, 1.84 R⊙, F6 star HAT-P-7 (P´al et al. 2008). In addition to being in the Kepler field, HAT- P-7b is interesting because Rossiter-McLaughlin measurements indicate that it is in a polar or retro- grade orbit (Winn et al. 2009; Narita et al. 2009). More relevant to modeling its atmosphere is the fact that, due to its close proximity to a large, relatively hot (∼6350 K) star, HAT-P-7b experiences unusu- ally high stellar irradiation (∼4.8×109 erg cm−2 s−1 at the substellar point). As an early confirmation that Kepler was per- forming well, Borucki et al. (2009) published 10 days of commisioning-phase data on HAT-P-7b. These data reveal a surprisingly large secondary eclipse depth in the Kepler band (∼0.43-0.83 µm), as the corresponding planet-star flux ratio decreases by (1.3 ± 0.1) × 10−4 when the planet passes behind the star.2 Borucki et al. (2009) suggest that such a large contrast ratio could imply that the atmosphere absorbs strongly and has minimal redistribution to the night side (low Pn, in our language). They es- timate a day-side temperature of 2650 ± 100 K. Infrared data for HAT-P-7b became available shortly thereafter, when Christiansen et al. (2010) presented secondary eclipse observations of the planet employing the IRAC instrument on the Spitzer Space Telescope. They found planet-star flux-ratios of (9.8 ± 1.7) × 10−4, (15.9 ± 0.22) × 10−4, (24.5 ± 3.1) × 10−4, and (22.5 ± 5.2) × 10−4 at the IRAC 3.6-µm, 4.5-µm, 5.8-µm, and 8.0-µm, chan- nels, respectively. Although, as Christiansen et al. (2010) ar- gue, HAT-P-7b's atmosphere is irradiated strongly enough that it is probably too hot for the con- densates that might otherwise be expected to con- tribute significant scattering opacity, we neverthe- less tried adding an ad hoc extra scatterer to the upper atmosphere of some models. We find that the optical point can easily be matched by a model with significant optical scattering, but such models drastically underpredict the Spitzer data. Since the Borucki et al. (2009) speculation of an extremely hot 2 This contrast ratio is similar to the expected dip in flux for an Earth-sized planet passing in front of a Sun-like star, and therefore indicated that Kepler should be capable of per- forming the mission for which it was designed. 3 upper atmosphere with low albedo came before the infrared data were published, it might have been a little bit premature. On the other hand, the expec- tation of low albedo is well motivated by the high stellar irradiation, and seems to be confirmed by the infrared observations. In Table 1, we present five thermochemical equi- librium models of HAT-P-7b, four having extremely hot upper atmospheres (ranging from H2's ∼3040 K to H5's ∼3180 K), and a comparison model without a thermal inversion (H1). These five models span a (small) range of values of both Pn (the degree of day-night redistribution) and κ′ (the strength of an ad hoc extra absorber, where the values are in cm2 g−1). Models with values of Pn larger than 0.1 are not displayed in this table because such models underpredict the optical data. The five HAT-P-7b models of Table 1 are dis- played in Fig. 1. The top-left and top-right panels portray the wavelength-dependent planet-star flux ratios in the optical and the infrared, respectively, and the corresponding data (Borucki et al. 2009; Christiansen et al. 2010) are superimposed. In both panels, planet and star fluxes are integrated over the relevant bandpasses, and the resulting integrated planet-star ratios are displayed as solid filled circles. The bottom panel shows temperature-pressure pro- files for these five models. Models H2-H5, with ex- tra optical opacity, have strong thermal inversions in which the upper atmosphere is heated to tem- peratures ∼> 1500 K greater than they would be in the absence of the extra absorber (as represented by model H1).3 The near- and mid-infrared spectra for inverted models H2-H5 are nearly indistinguish- able from one another, and are all reasonable fits to the IRAC data (although the models are ∼1-2σ higher than the data at 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm). Taking into account the optical data (top-left panel), model H5 is the best fit to the available data. HAT-P-7b's real atmosphere is probably not represented by a 1D radiative equilibrium model, such as model H5, but the available data suggest that significant flux might be absorbed high in the atmosphere, where the ra- diative timescale is short (Iro et al. 2005; Showman et al. 2008), which would imply that day-side heat would probably be reradiated before much advective redistribution has occurred. The association of high extra opacity with low day-night redistribution in the best-fitting model, therefore, is consistent with what should be expected. Christiansen et al. (2010) analyzed the thermo- chemical implications of the Kepler/Spitzer data, as well. Using the method described in Madhusudhan & Seager (2009) and the four IRAC data points in conjunction with the Kepler data, they find 3 The temperature-pressure profiles for models H2-H5 are shown up to extremely low pressures (∼10−8 bars), at which point nonequilibrium processes, such as photochemical disso- ciation and UV opacity, would be important for determining the true thermal profiles. 4 classes of models that fit the five data points op- timally. They find that a blackbody temperature of ∼3175 K is needed to fit the Kepler data, sig- nificantly higher than the brightness temperature inferred by Borucki et al. (2009); lower brightness temperatures are inferred for the IRAC data. Their best-fit (non-blackbody) models are (by construc- tion) not in local radiative or chemical equilibrium, but all of the best-fitting models contain thermal inversions, as do our models H2 -- H5. By relaxing the fit-criterion to 1.25-σ at each datum and allow- ing strongly nonequilibrium chemical abundances, they find a noninverted model with significant CH4 abundance, but the high temperatures of the atmo- sphere favor CO and therefore favor the inverted models, consistent with our analysis. 4. TRES-2 TrES-2 is a 1.20MJ, 1.22RJ planet in nearly cir- cular orbit 0.0356 AU from its 1.06 M⊙, 1.00 R⊙ solar-type (G0V) star (O'Donovan et al. 2006). At its substellar point, TrES-2 experiences an irradiat- ing flux of ∼1.1×109 erg cm−2 s−1, similar to that experienced by HD 209458b. O'Donovan et al. (2010) report IRAC observa- tions of TrES-2, together with nonequilibrium atmo- sphere models of the planet generated in the manner of Madhusudhan & Seager (2009). O'Donovan et al. find that the infrared data can be reasonably well fit by a blackbody model, a model with a thermal inversion, and a model without a thermal inversion. They point out that their model without a ther- mal inversion requires a surprisingly low abundance of CO, given the temperature of the atmosphere (∼1500 K). Therefore, they favor the model with the inversion. Here, we consider a variety of models of TrES- 2. Motivated by the analysis of O'Donovan et al. (2010), we examine models both with equilibrium and with nonequilibrium chemistry, all of which are in radiative equilibrium. In Table 1, we list five TrES-2 models with opacities defined by equilib- rium chemistry at solar abundances (T1 -- T5) and five that are completely analogous, except with the CO abundance artificially set to 0 (T1n -- T5n). In the latter group of models, the carbon that would have been in CO is instead in CH4, and the excess oxygen is instead in H2O. Among both the set of models with and without CO, there is a model that has no extra absorber and no inversion (T1 and T1n, respectively), and four models that do have an extra absorber and thermal inversions. After we had generated these atmosphere models, Croll et al. (2010) and Kipping & Bakos (2010) published Ks- band (∼2.2 µm) and Kepler-band observations, re- spectively, of TrES-2's secondary eclipse. The mod- els presented herein can, therefore, be thought of as predictions, not "postdictions," for the recent data. As a result, it was gratifying to see that the new data are consistent with our predictions, as de- scribed below. Figures 2 and 3 portray properties of the at- mosphere models with and without CO, respec- tively. In these figures, similar to Fig. 1, the top- left panel shows the model planet-star flux ratios in the optical and the top-right panel shows the same in the infrared, while the bottom panel shows the temperature-pressure profiles. We consider first the equilibrium chemistry mod- els in Fig. 2. The non-inverted model (T1) badly fails to reproduce the IRAC data at 4.5 µm and at 8.0 µm. The models with inversions (T2 -- T5) have similar temperature-pressure profiles to one another. The main difference among these mod- els is the temperature in the region of redistribu- tion (10−2 -- 10−1 bars), where the temperature dip ranges between ∼200 K (T2; Pn = 0.1) and ∼700 K (T4, T5; Pn = 0.3). As a consequence of their simi- larity, these four profiles correspond to very similar flux ratios at 4.5 µm, 5.8 µm, and 8.0 µm. Model T5 (κ′ = 0.3 cm2 g−1) is the best fit at 3.6 µm, but the inverted models all overpredict the 5.8 µm- point by ∼2σ. Models T2 -- T5 all predict Ks-band flux consistent with the Croll et al. (2010) observa- tions. All five models predict very low planet-star flux ratios in the optical, in contrast to the models and the Kepler observation of HAT-P-7b (for which Fp/F∗ = 1.3 × 10−4; see §3). Aside from model T1, which is clearly disfavored by the IRAC data, the other models all predict planet-star flux ratios of ∼< 2 × 10−5. With no extra absorber, model T1 still predicts a Kepler-band flux ratio of only ∼3×10−5. Models T2 -- T5 are all consistent with the Kipping & Bakos (2010) observation of (1.1 ± 0.7) × 10−5 (2-σ errors). The models without CO opacity (T1n -- T5n), portrayed in Fig. 3, are qualitatively quite similar to the equilibrium models in all our diagnostics (op- tical flux, infrared flux, and thermal profile). How- ever, there are some differences in detail. The deep isothermal layers of all five models are hotter by ∼150 K than their equilibrium counterparts, and the upper atmosphere of the inverted models (T2n -- T5n) is cooler by a comparable amount, while the upper atmosphere of the non-inverted model (T1n) is still warmer than its equlibrium analog (T1). The magnitude of the temperature dip in the redistribu- tion range is also somewhat muted compared with the equilibrium models. These slight T -P profile differences, in conjunction with the altered opaci- ties, result in slightly different optical and infrared spectra. In the infrared, the inverted no-CO mod- els produce lower flux at 5.8 µm, overpredicting the observed data by less than the equilbrium mod- els. Among no-CO models, the IRAC data are best fit by a model with slightly less extra optical ab- sorption (T4n, κ′ = 0.2 cm2 g−1). These models have optical fluxes that are qualitatively similar to their equilibrium counterparts, all predicting Ke- pler band flux ratios of ∼< 5 × 10−5. In particular, model T1n predicts slightly higher optical flux than does model T1, but the inverted models T2n -- T5n predict slightly lower optical fluxes than do models T2 -- T5. The predicted Ks-band and Kepler-band fluxes of models T3n -- T5n are all consistent with observations of Croll et al. (2010) and Kipping & Bakos (2010), respectively. The basic conclusion that we draw from ex- amining models with reduced CO opacity is that even such a drastic reduction of CO abundance as entirely eliminating it does not cause dramatic changes in thermal profiles or spectra. In the analysis of O'Donovan et al. (2010), changing the [CO]:[CH4]:[CO2] ratio from 10−6 : 10−6 : 0 (i.e., 1:1:0) to 10−4 : 5×10−5 : 2×10−6 (i.e., 50:25:1), to- gether with changing the temperature-pressure pro- file from a non-inverted to an inverted one, results in a modest improvement in the quality of the fit (particularly at 8-µm). We note that, in addition to having a surprisingly nonequilibrium [CO]:[CH4] ra- tio, the O'Donovan et al. (2010) noninverted model has a very low total abundance of carbon. Even though their inverted model is substantially sub- solar in carbon (by more than an order of magni- tude), reducing the carbon abundance by another two orders of magnitude is nearly tantamount to re- moving carbon from the opacities entirely. In sum, our analysis shows that, among models with solar abundance of carbon, the presence or absence of CO in the database does not make a large difference in the thermal profiles or in the emergent spectra, and in either case way a hot upper atmosphere and thermal inversion are required in the model in or- der to come at all close to matching the IRAC data. Individual molecular abundances substantially dif- ferent from what one would obtain for solar elemen- tal abundances might allow for marginally improved fits to the data, but might not yet be called for by the relatively sparse data available so far. The upper left panels of both Figs. 2 and 3 both show that models with extra optical absorbers in the upper atmosphere have lower planet-star flux ratios in the Kepler band than the models without an extra absorber. We revisit this point in §5. In light of this generic trend, and since among radia- tive equilbrium models the IRAC data are better fit by inverted models than by non-inverted models, we predict that Kepler photometry of TrES-2 will indicate low optical flux from this planet, not more than one or a few times 10−5 of the stellar flux. If future Kepler-band observations reveal optical flux in excess of this amount, that might be indicative of extra optical scattering opacity that was not in- cluded in our models. 5. OPTICAL FLUX VS. OPTICAL ABSORBER STRENGTH Here, we point out a puzzle: the upper left panel of Fig. 1 shows a different trend of optical flux vs. κ′ from the analogous panels of Figs. 2 and 3. L´opez- 5 Morales & Seager (2007) noted that inverted mod- els, with their hot upper atmospheres, might be ex- pected to have higher optical flux than non-inverted models. But how do we explain the trend seen for TrES-2 (Figs. 2 and 3)? If there is an extra absorber in the optical part of the spectrum (a κe, in the terminology of Bur- rows et al. 2008b, or a κ′ in the present work), the emergent optical flux is affected by two competing effects. The absorber makes the planet darker at altitude, but can also heat the upper atmosphere. The latter effect makes the upper atmosphere of the planet more emissive. Figure 4 illustrates how the balance of these two effects depends on the opacity (κ′) of the upper- atmosphere absorber, in both HAT-P-7b and TrES- 2. The Kepler bandpass brightness of Pn = 0.0 models of both planets (HAT-P-7b: green; TrES-2: blue) is plotted as a function of κ′, for a series of val- ues of κ′ between 0 and 1.1 cm2 g−1. For both plan- ets, a small amount of extra absorption results in reduced emergent flux in the Kepler band, and, for both planets, large values of κ′ ( ∼> 0.3 cm2 g−1) re- sult in increased optical emission, as emission from the Wien tail of the hot upper atmosphere becomes more prominent in the optical part of the spectrum. There is, therefore, a generic non-monotonic char- acter to the dependence of optical flux on κ′. The degree of the non-monotonicity, however, is greater for HAT-P-7b models than for TrES-2 models. In ∼> 0.3 cm2 g−1 is the former, the optical flux for κ′ greater than with no extra absorption, while in the latter, even with κ′ = 1.1 cm2 g−1 the optical flux is just over half of what it is with no extra absorp- tion. The origin of this difference is related to the properties of the irradiation. HAT-P-7 is an excep- tionally large (1.84R⊙) star that is fairly hot (F6, 6350 K), whereas TrES-2's star is a more ordinary solar-type star (1.003R⊙, G0V, 5850 K). As a re- sult, the incident optical irradiation at HAT-P-7b is more than 4 times as great as on TrES-2. This greatly enhanced incident optical irradiation results in a much greater sensitivity to the presence of an extra optical absorber. 6. CONCLUSION We have presented atmosphere models of HAT- P-7b and TrES-2, two of the three Kepler field plan- ets that were known prior to the start of the Kepler mission. We find that the combination of the IRAC and Kepler secondary eclipse data for HAT-P-7b, with a Kepler-bandpass secondary eclipse ratio of ∼1.3 × 10−4, appear to require an extremely hot upper atmosphere, with an extra optical absorber that creates a strong thermal inversion and with little day-night redistribution. The IRAC data for TrES-2 led us us to expect that TrES-2 has a much lower planet-star flux ratio ( ∼< 2 × 10−5) in the Ke- pler bandpass than does the HAT-P-7 system, and indeed this is what was seen in recently published 6 Kepler data of this object. Furthermore, we find that there is a non- monotonic relationship between κ′ and a planet's day-side This non- monotonicity highlights the need for multiwave- length observations in order to better estimate the atmospheric structure. emergent optical flux. grant NNX07AG80G. We also acknowledge sup- port through JPL/Spitzer Agreements 1328092, 1348668, and 1312647. The authors are pleased to acknowledge that part of this research was per- formed while in residence at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, and was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY05-51164. We thank Ivan Hubeny, Laurent Ibgui, Kevin Heng, and Jason Nordhaus for useful discussions. We also appreciate the careful reading and help- ful comments from the referee, Giovanna Tinetti. This study was supported in part by NASA APPENDIX PARAMETERIZING REDISTRIBUTION IN A 1D MODEL There have been several approaches used in the literature for treating the redistribution of day-side irradi- ation to the nightside in the context of one-dimensional models. Here, we consider several parameterizations and the relationships among them. Early work, including that of our group prior to Burrows et al. (2006), used only a single parameter (called "f ") to describe redistribution. However, there are at least three effects that ought to be included in a description of how an atmosphere redistributes heat: (1) some fraction of incident energy is transported to the nightside via atmospheric motions (we call this fraction "Pn"); (2) this redistribution occurs at some depth between the top and the bottom of the atmosphere; and (3) the visible face of the planet (the dayside at secondary eclipse phase) has (in general) an anisotropic distribution of specific intensity in the direction of Earth. Our more recent work, including this paper, employs our attempt, however imperfect, to incorporate these physical effects that 1D models from other groups have not fully included. In particular, when other modeling efforts have implemented schemes for day-night heat transport, they have essentially taken the redistribution to occur before the incoming radiation reaches the top of the atmosphere. In contrast, we specify the range of pressures at which the redistribution occurs; while our numerical choice might be not be accurate in detail, it is a physically motivated, less ad hoc way to parameterize the physics that we know affect emergent spectra. One of the best-known redistribution parameters is the afforementioned geometrical f factor, which arises from an energy balance relation of the following form: π f Lp = R2 pσT 4 unif , or, Fp F∗ a (cid:19)2 = f(cid:18) Rp . (1) (2) In eq. (1), Lp ≡ (πR2 p)L∗/(4πa2) is the total stellar power intercepted by the planet (and, therefore, approxi- mately equals the emergent radiation from the planet), Rp is the planet's radius, L∗ is the stellar luminosity, a is the orbital separation, σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and Tunif is the temperature of a uniform- temperature sphere of radius Rp whose flux at Earth near secondary eclipse phase would be the same as that of the planet. In eq. (2), Fp is the integrated flux from the planet at Earth,4 and F∗ is the integrated stellar flux. In eqs. (1) and (2), and in the remainder of this section, we have ignored both scattering in the planet's atmosphere and its own intrinsic luminosity (from its heat of formation, tidal heating, etc.). The f factor has been used by a number of authors in the last decade (Burrows et al. 2003, 2005; Fortney et al. 2005; L´opez-Morales & Seager 2007; Hansen 2008; and referred to as α in Barman et al. 2005).5 Perfect redistribution (implying that the planet is itself of uniform temperature) corresponds to f = 1/4. Zero unif (Rp/d)2, where d is the distance from the planet to Earth. 4 Fp = σT 4 5 We note that Burrows et al. (2008a) also use a parameter called f , but this f (which is typically set to 2/3) represents the direction-cosine of incident irradiation that is used in the planar atmosphere calculation, and is therefore related to distribution of temperature on the dayside, instead of to the fraction of energy that is redistributed to the nightside. Some work (e.g. that of Barman et al. 2005) integrates the contributions to the total planet-flux at Earth of a series of concentric annuli, from the substellar point to the terminator. Burrows et al. (2008a) show that this integral is extremely well-approximated by taking the entire visible hemisphere as being irradiated by the ray at direction-cosine 2/3. 7 redistribution, so that each annulus a given angle away from the substellar point absorbs and reradiates its local irradiation isotropically, corresponds to f = 2/3.6 There is, thus, a "beaming factor" that increases f by a factor of 4/3 over the value (1/2) that it would have if the dayside were of uniform temperature instead of peaked toward the center of the disk in accordance with the irradiating flux. f is typically implemented in 1D atmosphere models as simply a uniform reduction of the incident flux at the top of the atmosphere (algorithmically, though not physically, equivalent to the effect of albedo). Alternatively, we may characterize the redistribution by removing a fraction Pn of the incident stellar flux on the dayside in a prescribed pressure interval (as described in §2), and inserting the energy at a similar (or different) level on the nightside. In such a prescription, Pn plausibly ranges between 0 (corresponding to no redistribution) and 0.5 (corresponding to the nightside radiating as much power as the dayside, via redistributive winds). Burrows et al. (2006), Burrows et al. (2008a), and other work from our group imple- ment this procedure. In order to calculate theoretical secondary eclipse fluxes and spectra, one must have a model of the three-dimensional distribution of temperature in a planet's atmosphere (e.g., Showman et al. 2008, 2009; Burrows et al. 2010). In lieu of performing three-dimensional dynamical calculations, our 1D atmosphere models assume the same beaming factor for day-side emergent radiation, regardless of the total day-side radiance; and they assume uniform temperature on the nightside. In particular, on the dayside, when Pn = 0.5, f = 1/3 (which is 4/3 of the 1/4 that f would equal for a uniform-temperature dayside, when half the incident flux has been redistributed to the nightside). More generally, the integrated model day-side flux from the planet can be approximately described by eq. (2), taking f to be defined by f = 2 3 (1 − Pn) . (3) The descriptions in Cowan et al. (2007) of how "Tday" and "Tnight" depend on Pn correctly quantify the total emission from the day and night sides of the planet, but they do not include the beaming caused by an anisotropic temperature distribution on the dayside that is peaked at the substellar point; therefore, unlike what is suggested in Cowan et al. (2007), the integrated day-side flux is not described by taking the dayside to be of uniform temperature Tday. Yet a third redistribution parameter, ε, is suggested by Cowan & Agol (2010). ε ranges between 0 (no redistribution) and 1 (full redistribution). It initially appears to be defined similarly to Pn, and is described (in part) by the following relation: where eTday is the same as Tunif of eq. (1), i.e., a measure of the flux in the direction of Earth. In eq. (4), there is a tilde above the expression for day-side temperature to distinguish it from the corresponding expression in Cowan et al. (2007), which is a measure of the total day-side emission, as opposed to the flux in the direction of Earth. Comparing eqs. (1) and (4) shows that ε is a rescaling of f : ε = (8 − 12f )/5. Cowan & Agol suggest that their ε = 0 limit produces a brighter dayside than does the Pn = 0 limit, but it does not. Instead, the Pn = 0.5 limit produces a brighter dayside than does the ε = 1 limit (brighter by the beaming factor of 4/3). Finally, we emphasize that while eqs. (2) and (3) describe how the integrated planet flux depends on Pn, this parameter does more than simply affect the top-of-atmosphere energy budget. The real benefit of Pn (which is not captured by the above equations) is that, when nonzero, instead of reducing incident irradiation, it removes energy from the dayside (and deposits it on the nightside) at more realistic levels in the atmosphere. This process contributes to a slight thermal inversion by cooling the middle atmosphere, and, therefore, affects the ratio of 3.6-µm flux to the 4.5-µm flux in a way that is not reproduced by the standard f parameterizations in which incident irradiation is reduced at the top of the atmopshere. 6 In this case, the specific intensity in the direction of Earth from a annulus at direction-cosine µ away from the substellar point (at full-moon phase) is proportional to µ. Specifically, I[µ] = µL∗/(2πa)2. π Lp = (8 − 5ε)/12 day , R2 pσeT 4 (4) 8 REFERENCES Barman, T. S., Hauschildt, P. H., & Allard, F. 2005, ApJ, 632, 1132 Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Jenkins, J., Sasselov, D., Gilliland, R., Batalha, N., Latham, D. W., Caldwell, D., Basri, G., Brown, T., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., Dunham, E., Dupree, A. K., Gautier, T., Geary, J., Gould, A., Howell, S., Kjeldsen, H., Lissauer, J., Marcy, G., Meibom, S., Morrison, D., & Tarter, J. 2009, Science, 325, 709 Burrows, A., Budaj, J., & Hubeny, I. 2008a, ApJ, 678, 1436 Burrows, A., Dulick, M., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Bernath, P. F., Ram, R. S., Sharp, C. M., & Milsom, J. A. 2005, ApJ, 624, 988 Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 719 Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2007, ApJ, 668, L171 Burrows, A., Ibgui, L., & Hubeny, I. 2008b, ApJ, 682, 1277 Burrows, A., Ram, R. S., Bernath, P., Sharp, C. M., & Milsom, J. A. 2002, ApJ, 577, 986 Burrows, A., Rauscher, E., Spiegel, D., & Menou, K. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Burrows, A. & Sharp, C. M. 1999, ApJ, 512, 843 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubbard, W. B. 2003, ApJ, 594, 545 Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1140 Christiansen, J. L., Ballard, S., Charbonneau, D., Madhusudhan, N., Seager, S., Holman, M. J., Wellnitz, D. D., Deming, D., A'Hearn, M. F., & the EPOXI Team. 2010, ApJ, 710, 97 Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Cowan, N. B., Agol, E., & Charbonneau, D. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 641 Croll, B., Albert, L., Lafreni`ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & Fortney, J. J. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Fortney, J. J., Cooper, C. S., Showman, A. P., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2006, ApJ, 652, 746 Fortney, J. J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1419 Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 925 Hansen, B. M. S. 2008, ApJS, 179, 484 Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Latham, D. W., O'Donovan, F. T., Charbonneau, D., Torres, G., Sozzetti, A., Fernandez, J., & Everett, M. E. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1185 Hubeny, I. 1988, Computer Physics Communications, 52, 103 Hubeny, I., Burrows, A., & Sudarsky, D. 2003, ApJ, 594, 1011 Hubeny, I. & Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ, 439, 875 Iro, N., B´ezard, B., & Guillot, T. 2005, A&A, 436, 719 Kipping, D. M. & Bakos, G. ´A. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., Burrows, A., & Megeath, S. T. 2008, ApJ, 673, 526 Knutson, H. A., Howard, A. W., & Isaacson, H. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Kurucz, R. 1994, Solar abundance model atmospheres for 0,1,2,4,8 km/s. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 19. Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1994., 19 Kurucz, R. L. 1979, ApJS, 40, 1 -- . 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplement, 8, 14 Li, J. & Goodman, J. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Lopez-Morales, M., Coughlin, J. L., Sing, D. K., Burrows, A., Apai, D., Rogers, J. C., & Spiegel, D. S. 2009, ArXiv e-prints L´opez-Morales, M. & Seager, S. 2007, ApJ, 667, L191 Madhusudhan, N. & Seager, S. 2009, ApJ, 707, 24 -- . 2010, ArXiv e-prints Mislis, D. & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2009, A&A, 500, L45 Narita, N., Sato, B., Hirano, T., & Tamura, M. 2009, ArXiv e-prints O'Donovan, F. T., Charbonneau, D., Harrington, J., Madhusudhan, N., Seager, S., Deming, D., & Knutson, H. A. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1551 O'Donovan, F. T., Charbonneau, D., Mandushev, G., Dunham, E. W., Latham, D. W., Torres, G., Sozzetti, A., Brown, T. M., Trauger, J. T., Belmonte, J. A., Rabus, M., Almenara, J. M., Alonso, R., Deeg, H. J., Esquerdo, G. A., Falco, E. E., Hillenbrand, L. A., Roussanova, A., Stefanik, R. P., & Winn, J. N. 2006, ApJ, 651, L61 P´al, A., Bakos, G. ´A., Torres, G., Noyes, R. W., Latham, D. W., Kov´acs, G., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Butler, R. P., Sasselov, D. D., Sipocz, B., Esquerdo, G. A., Kov´acs, G., Stefanik, R., L´az´ar, J., Papp, I., & S´ari, P. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1450 Rabus, M., Deeg, H. J., Alonso, R., Belmonte, J. A., & Almenara, J. M. 2009, ArXiv e-prints Raetz, S., Mugrauer, M., Schmidt, T. O. B., Roell, T., Eisenbeiss, T., Hohle, M., Seifahrt, A., Koeltzsch, A., Vanko, M., Broeg, C., Koppenhoefer, J., & Neuhauser, R. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 253, IAU Symposium, 436 -- 439 Richardson, L. J., Deming, D., Horning, K., Seager, S., & Harrington, J. 2007, Nature, 445, 892 Rowe, J. F., Matthews, J. M., Seager, S., Miller-Ricci, E., Sasselov, D., Kuschnig, R., Guenther, D. B., Moffat, A. F. J., Rucinski, S. M., Walker, G. A. H., & Weiss, W. W. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1345 Sharp, C. M. & Burrows, A. 2007, ApJS, 168, 140 Showman, A. P., Cooper, C. S., Fortney, J. J., & Marley, M. S. 2008, ApJ, 682, 559 Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., Marley, M. S., Freedman, R. S., Knutson, H. A., & Charbonneau, D. 2009, ApJ, 699, 564 Sozzetti, A., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Latham, D. W., Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Laird, J. B., & O'Donovan, F. T. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1190 Spiegel, D. S., Burrows, A., Ibgui, L., Hubeny, I., & Milsom, J. A. 2010, ApJ, 709, 149 Spiegel, D. S., Silverio, K., & Burrows, A. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1487 Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Hubeny, I. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1121 Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. 2000, ApJ, 538, 885 Tinetti, G., Liang, M., Vidal-Madjar, A., Ehrenreich, D., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., & Yung, Y. L. 2007, ApJ, 654, L99 Tinetti, G., Meadows, V. S., Crisp, D., Fong , W., Velusamy, T., & Snively, H. 2005, Astrobiology, 5, 461 Welsh, W. F., Orosz, J. A., Seager, S., Fortney, J. J., Jenkins, J., Rowe, J. F., Koch, D., & Borucki, W. J. 2010, ApJ, 713, L145 Winn, J. N., Johnson, J. A., Albrecht, S., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Crossfield, I. J., & Holman, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 703, L99 Youdin, A. N. & Mitchell, J. L. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Zahnle, K., Marley, M. S., Freedman, R. S., Lodders, K., & Fortney, J. J. 2009, ApJ, 701, L20 9 TABLE 1 HAT-P-7b and TrES-2 models Model H1a H2 H3 H4 H5 T1b T2 T3 T4 T5 T1n T2n T3n T4n T5n Pn 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 κ′ (cm2 g−1) 0.0 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 Chemistry equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium equilibrium no COc no CO no CO no CO no CO aModels H1 -- H5 have the following parameters -- orbital semimajor axis (a), planet and stellar surface gravity (gp, g∗), planet and stellar radii (Rp, R∗), and stellar effective temperature T∗ -- appropriate to the HAT-P-7 system (a = 0.0377 AU; log10 gp = 3.38, log10 g∗ = 4.08 where gp, g∗ are in cgs; Rp = 1.363RJ , where RJ ≡ 7.15 × 109 cm is Jupiter's radius; R∗ = 1.84R⊙; T∗ = 6350 K). The irradiating spectrum is interpolated from Kurucz models. bModels T1 -- T5 and T1n -- T5n have parameters appropriate to the TrES-2 system (a = 0.0356 AU; log10 gp = 3.30, log10 g∗ = 4.43 where gp, g∗ are in cgs; Rp = 1.224RJ ; R∗ = 1.003R⊙; T∗ = 5850 K). cModels T1n -- T5n have opacities defined by out-of-equilibrium chemistry, where CO has been artificially removed, with the carbon instead in CH4 and the excess oxygen instead in H2O. 10 0.0003 0.0002 * F Model optical flux of HAT−P−7b / P F Kepler Band 0.0001 0.0000 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.10, κ′=0.0) H1 (P n 0.05, κ′=0.4) H2 (P n 0.10, κ′=0.7) H3 (P n 0.10, κ′=1.1) H4 (P n 0.00, κ′=1.1) H5 (P n 0.9 1 λ (µm) 0.7 0.8 0.005 0.004 0.003 * F / P F 0.002 0.001 0 1 1.1 Model IR spectra of HAT−P−7b 0.10, κ′=0.0) H1 (P n 0.05, κ′=0.4) H2 (P n 0.10, κ′=0.7) H3 (P n 0.10, κ′=1.1) H4 (P n 0.00, κ′=1.1) H5 (P n λ (µm) 10 10−10 10−8 10−6 ) s r a b ( P 10−4 10−2 100 102 104 0.10, κ′=0.0) H1 (P n 0.05, κ′=0.4) H2 (P n 0.10, κ′=0.7) H3 (P n 0.10, κ′=1.1) H4 (P n 0.00, κ′=1.1) H5 (P n Model T−P profiles of HAT−P−7b 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 T (K) Fig. 1. -- HAT-P-7b model atmospheres. The models (H1 -- H5) encompass varying degrees of redistribution (parameterized as Pn) and upper-atmosphere optical absorption (parameterized as κ′, where the values are in cm2 g−1), and are listed in Table 1. Measured data are shown where available. Top left: Optical planet-star flux ratios. The data point (indicated by the 1-σ error bars) is from Borucki et al. (2009), and the horizontal black line indicates the full width at 10% maximum of the Kepler bandpass. The filled colored circles show the integrals of the model flux over the Kepler bandpass. The model that fits the data best is H5, which has significant upper-atmosphere absorption (κ′ = 1.1 cm2 g−1) and no redistribution. Top Right: Infrared planet-star flux ratios. The data points with 1-σ error bars are IRAC data from Christiansen et al. (2010). Filled colored circles show the integrals of models over the response functions for the IRAC bands. Among models with significant upper-atmosphere absorption (models H2 -- H5), there is little difference in the infrared spectrum. Model H5 is a slightly better fit than H2, a slightly worse fit than H3 and H4 at 3.6 µm, and is a slightly worse fit than models H2 -- H4 at 4.5 µm. The models fit the 5.8-µm and 8.0-µm IRAC data equally well. Bottom: Temperature-pressure profiles. The models with extra optical absorption in the upper atmosphere (models H2 -- H5) all show large thermal inversions, with upper-atmosphere temperatures ∼1500 K or more hotter than what would be expected in the absence of extra heating (indicated by model H1). Note that our models with an extra absorber extend to very low pressures (∼10−8 bars), where other physics in the thermosphere might be important in determining the actual radiative equilibrium thermal profile. * F / P F Kepler Band 10−4 10−5 10−6 10−7 0.4 0.5 0.6 ) s r a b ( P 10−8 10−6 10−4 10−2 100 102 104 Model optical flux of TrES−2 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1 (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2 (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5 (P n 0.7 λ (µm) 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 0.005 0.004 0.003 * F / P F 0.002 0.001 0 1 11 Model IR spectra of TrES−2 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1 (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2 (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5 (P n λ (µm) 10 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1 (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2 (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4 (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5 (P n Model T−P profiles of TrES−2 1000 1500 2000 2500 T (K) Fig. 2. -- TrES-2 equilibrium chemistry model atmospheres, analogous to Fig. 1, but for TrES-2 instead of HAT-P-7b. The models (T1 -- T5) encompass varying degrees of heat redistribution (Pn) and upper-atmosphere optical absorption (κ′, values in cm2 g−1), and are listed in Table 1. Top left: Optical planet-star flux ratios (log scale). The horizontal black line indicates the full width at 10% maximum of the Kepler bandpass, and is at the level of the data (shown with with 2-σ vertical error bars) from Kipping & Bakos (2010). The filled colored circles show the integrals of the model flux over the Kepler bandpass. Models with upper atmosphere absorption (T2 -- T5) tend to have low optical flux (Fp/F∗ ∼< 2 × 10−5). Even with κ′ = 0 cm2 g−1 (model T1), the optical flux ratio is ∼3×10−5. Models T2 -- T5 are all consistent with the data, to 2 σ. Top Right: Infrared planet-star flux ratios. The black square data points with 1-σ error bars are IRAC data from O'Donovan et al. (2010), and the black cross data point (with 1-σ error bars) represents Ks-band data from Croll et al. (2010). Filled colored circles show the integrals of models over the response functions for the IRAC bands (at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 µm) and for Ks-band (at 2.2 µm). The 4.5-µm, 5.8-µm, and 8.0-µm IRAC data clearly favor models with some extra absorption. At 3.6 µm, 4.5 µm, and 8.0 µm, model T5 is a good fit to the data, but it misses the data by ∼2σ at 5.8 µm. Bottom: Temperature-pressure profiles. The models with extra optical absorption in the upper atmosphere (models T2 -- T5) show moderate thermal inversions, with upper-atmosphere temperatures ∼500 K hotter than what would be expected in the absence of extra heating (indicated by model T1). 12 * F / P F 10−4 10−5 10−6 10−7 Kepler Band Model optical flux of TrES−2 (no CO) 0.005 0.004 0.003 * F / P F 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1n (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2n (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5n (P n 0.9 1 0.002 0.001 0 1 1.1 0.7 0.8 λ (µm) Model IR spectra of TrES−2 (no CO) 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1n (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2n (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5n (P n λ (µm) 10 0.2, κ′=0.0) T1n (P n 0.1, κ′=0.2) T2n (P n 0.2, κ′=0.2) T3n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.2) T4n (P n 0.3, κ′=0.3) T5n (P n 0.4 0.5 0.6 ) s r a b ( P 10−8 10−6 10−4 10−2 100 102 104 Model T−P profiles of TrES−2 (no CO) 1000 1500 2000 2500 T (K) Fig. 3. -- TrES-2 nonequilibrium chemistry model atmospheres, analogous to Fig. 2, but with CO artificially removed from the opacities and with CH4 and H2O correspondingly enhanced. Below, we compare with the models shown in Fig. 2. Top left: Optical planet-star flux ratios, with Kipping & Bakos (2010) data (including 2-σ error bars) shown. As in Fig. 2, models with upper atmosphere absorption (T2n -- T5n) tend to have low optical flux (Fp/F∗ ∼< 2 × 10−5). With κ′ = 0 cm2 g−1 (model T1n), the optical flux ratio is ∼5×10−5, higher than the corresponding model in Fig. 2, but still low compared with the HAT-P-7b data and models. Models T2n -- T5n are all consistent with the data, to 2 σ. Top Right: Infrared planet-star flux ratios. Again, the IRAC data clearly favor models with some extra absorption. The 5.8-µm-discrepancy for model T5n is significantly reduced compared with the corresponding model with equilibrium chemistry. With CO removed, model T4n is a reasonably good fit to the data (within ∼1σ at all IRAC bands). Bottom: Temperature-pressure profiles. The overall features of the profiles are similar, but the detailed shapes of the profiles are somewhat different, with isothermal regions ∼100 K warmer and upper atmospheres ∼100 K cooler than the equilibrium chemistry models. HAT−P−7b Kepler Secondary Eclipse Data (Borucki et al. 2009) 13 Non−monotonicity in Kepler−band− integrated flux vs. opacity (κ′) Kepler−band−integrated HAT−P−7b models Kepler−band−integrated TrES−2 models 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 κ' (cm2 g−1) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 ) % ( F / F * p 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 0 Fig. 4. -- Kepler bandpass brightness ratios vs. upper atmosphere absorption (κ′). Models of HAT-P-7b (thick light green) and TrES-2 (thick blue) are shown, in addition to the Kepler data for HAT-P-7b (dashed red) with 1-σ errors (dotted dark green). These models have no redistribution to the nightside (Pn = 0). The relationship between optical flux and κ′ is non- monotonic for both planets, but more so for HAT-P-7b. In particular, for HAT-P-7b, large enough values of κ′ (values above ∼0.3 cm2 g−1) lead to enough flux in the region of the Wien tail that the optical flux is greater than it would be with no extra absorber. However, for TrES-2, despite the non-monotonicity, the planet is still brightest in the optical without any extra absorber.
1711.00185	1	1711	2017-11-01T03:13:01	Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets: Topography, Biosignatures, and Artificial Mega-Structures	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Seeing oceans, continents, quasi-static weather, and other surface features on exoplanets may allow us to detect and characterize life outside the solar system. The Proxima b planet resides within the stellar habitable zone allowing for liquid water on its surface, and it may be Earth-like. However, even the largest planned telescopes will not be able to resolve its surface features directly. Here, we demonstrate an inversion technique to image indirectly exoplanet surfaces using observed unresolved reflected light variations over the course of the exoplanets orbital and axial rotation: ExoPlanet Surface Imaging (EPSI). We show that the reflected light curve contains enough information to detect both longitudinal and latitudinal structures and to map exoplanet surface features. We demonstrate this using examples of Solar system planets and moons as well as simulated planets with Earth-like life and artificial megastructures. We also describe how it is possible to infer the planet and orbit geometry from light curves. In particular, we show how albedo maps of Proxima b can be successfully reconstructed for tidally locked, resonance, and unlocked axial and orbital rotation. Such albedo maps obtained in different wavelength passbands can provide "photographic" views of distant exoplanets. We estimate the signal-to-noise ratio necessary for successful inversions and analyse telescope and detector requirements necessary for the first surface images of Proxima b and other nearby exoplanets.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version November 2, 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 7 1 0 2 v o N 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 5 8 1 0 0 . 1 1 7 1 : v i X r a SURFACE IMAGING OF PROXIMA B AND OTHER EXOPLANETS: TOPOGRAPHY, BIOSIGNATURES, AND ARTIFICIAL MEGA-STRUCTURES S. V. Berdyugina1,2, J. R. Kuhn2 Draft version November 2, 2017 ABSTRACT Seeing oceans, continents, quasi-static weather, and other surface features on exoplanets may allow us to detect and characterize life outside the solar system. The Proxima b planet resides within the stellar habitable zone allowing for liquid water on its surface, and it may be Earth-like. However, even the largest planned telescopes will not be able to resolve its surface features directly. Here, we demonstrate an inversion technique to image indirectly exoplanet surfaces using observed unresolved reflected light variations over the course of the exoplanets orbital and axial rotation: ExoPlanet Surface Imaging (EPSI). We show that the reflected light curve contains enough information to detect both longitudinal and latitudinal structures and to map exoplanet surface features. We demonstrate this using examples of Solar system planets and moons as well as simulated planets with Earth-like life and artificial megastructures. We also describe how it is possible to infer the planet and orbit geometry from light curves. In particular, we show how albedo maps of Proxima b can be successfully reconstructed for tidally locked, resonance, and unlocked axial and orbital rotation. Such albedo maps obtained in different wavelength passbands can provide "photographic" views of distant exoplanets. We estimate the signal-to-noise ratio necessary for successful inversions and analyse telescope and detector requirements necessary for the first surface images of Proxima b and other nearby exoplanets. Subject headings: planetary systems - exoplanets 1. INTRODUCTION Resolving surface features (e.g., continents) or global weather patterns on even the nearest exoplanets through direct imaging requires optical systems many km in size – this will not happen soon. On the other hand, emitted and reflected planet light has been detected from exo- planet host stars by different observing techniques in a few cases. The Spitzer space telescope measured IR light curves of hot Jupiters and detected enhanced emission longitudes ("hot spots") in their atmospheres (e.g., Har- rington et al. 2006; Knutson 2007; Cowan & Agol 2008; Crossfield et al. 2010). However, the latitudinal informa- tion could not be yielded from these data. High-precision polarimetry has provided first albedo and color measure- ments for a hot Jupiter (Berdyugina et al. 2008, 2011). Similarly, CoRoT, Kepler and Hubble telescopes achieved sensitivity to detect optical and near UV reflected light curves from hot Jupiters (e.g., Snellen et al. 2009; De- mory et al. 2011; Faigler & Mazeh 2015; Evans et al. 2013). Model solutions for albedo maps and orbital parame- ters based on reflected flux or polarization light curves have been previously demonstrated for exoplanets (e.g., Cowan et al. 2009; Fluri & Berdyugina 2010; Kawahara & Fujii 2011; Fujii & Kawahara 2012; Schwartz et al. 2016). With an independent formalism presented in this paper – ExoPlanet Surface Imaging (EPSI) – we confirm some of the conclusions of those papers and elaborate applica- tions for planets with and without clouds, with seasonal variations, photosynthetic organism colonies and artifi- cial structures built by advanced civilizations. Multi- 1 Kiepenheuer Institut fur Sonnenphysik, Schoneckstrasse 6, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; [email protected] 2 Institute for Astronomy/Maui, University of Hawaii, 34 Ohia Ku St., Pukalani, HI 96768, USA; [email protected] wavelength observations of such planets may enable de- tection of primitive and even advanced exolife. Unlike Cowan et al. (2009) we can recover not only longitudinal information but also plenty of latitudinal information on exoplanet surfaces. Also, in contrast to Fujii & Kawa- hara (2012), our modeling suggests that large telescope apertures are needed to infer surface albedo maps. For example, mapping Proxima b requires a telescope with the diameter at least 12 m. This paper focuses on re- alistic models and expectations for mapping the nearest exoplanets. We show that moderate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) time-series photometry of an exoplanet's reflected light can yield a 2D surface map of its albedo using an in- version technique. Reflected light photometry (or/and polarimetry) of exoplanets when the planet rotation axis is inclined with respect to the orbit plane normal direc- tion offers the greatest possibility for mapping the ex- oplanet surface or seeing stable atmospheric structure with surprisingly high spatial resolution. Our numeri- cal technique follows similar algorithms used for map- ping starspots (Berdyugina 1998; Berdyugina et al. 1998, 2002). The recent discovery of the nearest exoplanet Prox- ima b (Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2016) is an opportunity for obtaining the first surface (and/or weather) images of a possibly Earth-like exoplanet. Here we investigate in some detail the orbit-rotation parameter space rele- vant to Proxima b. We estimate the necessary SNR of the data and evaluate how it can be achieved with future telescopes. The paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we describe our direct model and an inversion algorithm. In Section 3, we present simulations and inversions for exo- planets with Earth-like albedo distribution due to ocean 2 Berdyugina & Kuhn and land topography. We show that, under some circum- stances, there is sufficient information in the reflected light curve to resolve an accurate map of the exoplanet surface on the scale of subcontinents. We also discuss limitations due to data noise, weather system evolution, and seasonal variations in the cloud and surface albedo. In Section 4, we present inversions for Solar system plan- ets and moons as analogs of exoplanets. We can recover global circulation cloud patterns on Jupiter, Neptune, and Venus, as well as surface features on the Moon, Mars, Io and Pluto. In Section 5, we present models for spectral (broad-band) imaging of exoplanets with Earth-like life and demonstrate that photosynthetic biosignatures and surface composition can be unambigously detected with our technique. We also model hypothetical planets with global artificial structures which can be detected under certain circumstances. In Section 6, we present simula- tions and inversions for the Proxima b planet assuming tidally locked orbits at the 1:1 and 2:3 resonances. In Section 7, we investigate and formulate observational re- quirements for the telescope size and scattered light level, in order to obtain spectral images of Proxima b and possi- ble rocky planets in the nearest to the Sun stellar system Alpha Centauri A and B. We find that telescopes in di- ameter of 12 m or larger and with a high level of scattered light suppression can achieve the required signal-to-noise ratio in planet brightness measurements above the stellar glare background. We also estimate how many Earth-size and super-Earth planets in water-based habitable zones (WHZ) of nearby 3500 AFGKM stars can be imaged with our technique depending on the telescope aperture for a given scattered light background. Finally, In Section 8, we summarize our results and conclusions. 2. MODEL AND INVERSION ALGORITHMS In this section, we describe the model and the inver- sion algorithm. The model includes radiation physics and star-planet geometry. The inversion algorithm includes criteria for choosing a unique solution and for evaluating the quality of the recovered image. The concept of our EPSI technique is evident if we consider a set of high albedo spots at fixed longitude but variable latitude. Figure 1 shows how the latitude in- formation of each reflective spot is encoded in the yearly variation of the peak daily brightness. Each latitude cre- ates a distinct yearly variation profile, while each lon- gitude affects the light curve at a distinct daily tempo- ral phase. It is evident that de-projecting corresponding daily phased brightness measurements over the course of an exoplanet year allows, in principle, reconstruction of the latitude and longitude albedo variation from orbital and rotational sampling. In fact, assuming that the surface structure does not (or insignificantly) evolve during the time covered by the light curve, this information can be inverted into a 2D map of the surface – an indirect imaging technique that is employed in various remote sensing applications, e.g., asteroid mapping or stellar surface imaging. Fujii & Kawahara (2012) employed this approach combined with the Tikhonov Regularization (TR) inversion algorithm, which minimized discrepances between the model and observations by choosing the solution with the minimum albedo gradient, i.e., it results in the smoothest map solu- tion. Here, we describe an algorithm employing the Oc- Fig. 1.- Reflected light curves for an exoplanet with a single high albedo spot as a Gaussian with the width about 5 degrees. The planet has an orbit period of 100 time units with a diurnal period of 10. The solid curve shows the light curve for an equato- rial spot which goes in and out of view due to axial rotation and is illuminated fully or in part due to orbital motion. When the spot is moved to other latitudes, the peak amplitudes are changed. Sym- bols joined by dashed lines show the corresponding peak brightness for a spot located at the marked planetary latitudes. The observer here is located 90◦ from the planet rotation axis and the normal to the plane of the orbit is 45◦ from the rotation axis. These cal- culations assume a simple cosθ albedo angle dependence. camian Approach (OA) inversion technique (Berdyugina 1998). It is based on the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which does not constrain the solution with any prior specific smoothness properties (see Section 2.2). 2.1. Direct Modeling 2.1.1. Radiation Physics The reflecting surface of the planet is divided by a grid in longitude and latitude. Each grid pixel is assigned a geometrical albedo value A for a given wavelength or passband and a phase function P defining the angular distribution of the reflected light. Thus, if P is defined, there are N = Nlat × Nlon unknowns, which comprise an albedo map of the planet with Nlat latitudes and Nlon longitudes. This generic description of the surface al- lows us to compute reflected light from various surfaces, including a cloud deck and the planet surface with and without an atmosphere. Different phase functions can be assigned for differ- ent scatterers, e.g., Rayleigh for gas and small particles, Mie for cloud droplets, lab measured BRDF for various surfaces, etc. (e.g., Berdyugina et al. 2016; Berdyug- ina 2016). For simplicity, initial tests presented in this paper were calculated with the assumption that sur- face reflection is isotropic, gaseous atmospheric scatter- ing is Rayleigh, PRay, and cloud particles are spheri- cal droplets, PMie, if not stated otherwise throughout the paper. In some cases, reflected flux spectra from dense (optically thick) high clouds can be described by a composite phase function including a Rayleigh scatter- ing contribution from a thin gaseous atmosphere above the cloud deck and a diffuse, but wavelength-dependent reflected flux from clouds of a given albedo Ac. Hence, to account for clouds, we assume that each planet map pixel can have contributions from clouds and planet surface, with respective filling factors fc and 1 − fc. The cor- responding gaseous atmosphere scattering contributions depend on the optical thickness of the atmosphere above Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 3 the planet surface and above the cloud deck. Here, we assume that the light scattered by clouds downwards and subsequently reflected by the surface is trapped within the atmosphere and does not reach an external observer (i.e., one cannot "see" through clouds). This approach further simplifies the problem and accelerates inversions. Multiple scattering is computed by solving iteratively the radiation transfer equations for intensity and polar- ization, i.e., for the Stokes vector I = (I, Q, U, V )T of a given frequency (omitted for clarity) toward the direction defined by two angles (µ = cos θ, ψ): µ dI(τ, µ, ψ) dτ = I(τ, µ, ψ) − S(τ, µ, ψ) (1) with the total source function S(τ, µ, ψ) = κ(τ )B(τ ) + σ(τ )Ssc(τ, µ, ψ) κ(τ ) + σ(τ ) , (2) where κ and σ are absorption and scattering opacities, Ssc and B are the scattering source function and the unpolarized thermal emission, respectively, and τ is the optical depth in the atmosphere with τ = 0 at the top. The formal solution of Eq. (1) is (e.g., Sobolev 1956) I(τ, µ, ψ) = I(τ∗, µ, ψ)e−(τ∗−τ )/µ τ S(τ(cid:48), µ, ψ)e−(τ(cid:48)−τ )/µ dτ(cid:48) µ (3) , + (cid:82) τ∗ where τ∗ is either the optical depth at the bottom of the atmosphere for the Stokes vector I+(τ, µ, ψ) coming from the bottom to the top (θ < π/2) or the optical depth at the top of the atmosphere (τ∗ = 0) for the Stokes vector I−(τ, µ, ψ) coming from the top to the bottom (θ > π/2). The scattering source function Ssc is expressed via the scattering phase matrix P(µ, µ(cid:48); ψ, ψ(cid:48)), depending on the directions of the incident (µ(cid:48), ψ(cid:48)) and scattered (µ, ψ) light: Ssc(τ, µ, ψ) = P(µ, µ(cid:48); ψ, ψ(cid:48))I(τ, µ(cid:48), ψ(cid:48)) dΩ(cid:48) 4π . (4) (cid:90) It has contributions from scattering both incident stel- lar light and intrinsic thermal emission. Their relative contributions depend on the frequency. For instance, for Rayleigh scattering the intensity of the thermal emission of an Earth-like planet in the blue part of the spectrum is negligible compared to that of the scattered stellar light. The phase matrix P(µ, µ(cid:48); ψ, ψ(cid:48)) is a 4 × 4 matrix with six independent parameters for scattering cases on particles with a symmetry (e.g., Hansen & Travis 1974). In this paper we employ the Rayleigh and Mie scattering phase matrices but our formalism is valid for other phase functions too. The Stokes vector of the light emerging from the plan- etary atmosphere I(0, µ, ψ) is obtained by integrating it- eratively Equations (2) and (3) for a given vertical dis- tribution of the temperature and opacity in a planetary atmosphere. We solve this problem under the following assumptions: 1) the atmosphere is plane-parallel and static; 2) the planet is spherically symmetric; 3) stellar radiation can enter the planetary atmosphere from different angles and can be polarized; 4) an incoming photon is either absorbed or scattered according to opacities in the atmosphere; 5) an absorbed photon does not alter the atmosphere (model atmosphere includes thermodynamics effects of irradiation); 6) photons can be scattered multiple times until they escape the atmosphere or absorbed. These assumptions expand those in Fluri & Berdyug- ina (2010), namely that multiple scattering on both molecules and particles is accounted for, stellar irradi- ation can be polarized and vary with an incident angle, and the planetary atmosphere and surface can be inho- mogeneous in both longitude and latitude. Boundary conditions are defined by stellar irradiation at the top, surface reflection at the bottom, and planetary thermal radiation, if necessary. Note that the bottom bound- ary condition refers to reflection from both the planetary surface and the cloud deck. Depending on the structure of the phase matrix and the boundary conditions, the equations are solved for all or fewer Stokes vector com- ponents. Normally it takes 3–15 iterations to achieve a required accuracy (depending on the surface albedo and optical thickness of the atmosphere). The stellar light is initially approximated by black body radiation with the effective temperature of the star, but nothing prevents us to employ real stellar spectra. Theoretically, the stellar spectrum is removed by nor- malization to the incident light (like in the case of the Solar system bodies). In reality, however, stellar spec- tral lines induce irradiation fluctuations and, hence, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) variations with wavelength. In Section 7 we show realistic calculations of the SNR for the nearest exoplanet(s) in the Alpha Centauri sys- tem in broad photometric bands that is feasible in the near future. For cloudless Earth-like planets, we used a standard Earth atmosphere (McClatchey et al. 1972), for which we computed Rayleigh scattering opacities and optical thickness depending in the height in the atmosphere. For cloudy planets, we assumed an atmosphere of a given op- tical thickness above clouds, while cloud particles scatter light according to the chosen phase function. Using such atmospheres, we have computed reflected radiation for a set of incoming and outgoing angles. Since the amount of scattered light in a cloudless atmosphere depends on the surface albedo, we also computed the out- going radiation for a set of surface albedo values. These pre-computed sets were used for simulations and inver- sions of light curves. It is obvious that the optical thick- ness of the atmosphere influences the visibility of the surface. Therefore, for thicker atmospheres there is less information in the light curve on the surface albedo, and this has to be accounted for while carrying out inversions. Time-dependent reflected light curves were computed by integrating local Stokes parameters over the planetary surface at different rotational and orbital phases. Vari- ous levels of Poisson (photon) noise were introduced into the theoretical light curves to imitate observations. 2.1.2. Star and Planet Geometry If the planet is angularly resolved from the star by di- rect imaging with a large enough telescope, its flux can be measured directly. This also implies that the planet flux should exceed background stellar scattered light (in- cluding telescope scattering and sky background) at the angular separation between the planet and the star. If 4 Berdyugina & Kuhn tional phases is computed by integrating the intensity of the reflected light over the set of visible pixels weighted by the pixel area, albedo and illumination fraction. For anisotropic reflection (scattering), it is also weighted by the phase function. 2.2. Inversion Algorithm Recovering a planet surface albedo distribution from a time series of flux measurements requires solving an ill-posed problem: D = F S, (5) where D is a column vector containing M observations, S is a column vector containing N pixels on the planetary surface (in longitude and latitude), and F is the response operator expressed as an N × M matrix. The matrix F determines transformation of a planet image into a data or model light curve. It includes all the radiation physics and geometry described in the previous section. Thus our task is to obtain the albedo map S from the data D under the assumptions included into F . A simple inversion of the matrix F could provide an exact solution if N = M , but the solution will be noisy and unstable due to noise in the data. Alternatively, this problem can be solved (also for the case N (cid:54)= M ) by max- imizing the overall probability of obtaining the observed data (the likelihood function). However, to avoid fitting the data noise, the overall probability has to be reduced to some "reasonable" level, which leads to multiple pos- sible solutions for a given probability (likelihood). The choice of the probability density function to calculate the likelihood function and the solution "goodness" criterion define the inversion algorithm and the solution itself. Here we apply an Occamian Approach (OA) algorithm inspired by the "Occam's razor" principle and having been employed for mapping stellar surface brightness from time series of both spectral line profiles and the stellar flux (e.g., Berdyugina et al. 1998, 2002). In con- trast to the broadly used Maximum Entropy (ME) and Tikhonov Regularization (TR) methods, the OA algo- rithm does not define an a priori quality of the solu- tion, such as minimum information (ME) or maximum smoothness (TR). Instead, the OA chooses a solution S with the information content equal to that in the data by means of a global maximization of the probability to obtain the observed light curve with the minimum number of significant principal components (see details in Berdyugina 1998). We use the Poisson function to com- pute the likelihood function and the information content in the data. 2.3. Inversion Quality To characterize the overall success of the inversion we define an Inversion Quality (IQ) parameter as follows. First, we transform an image S into a "binary" form using a threshold albedo, AT (e.g., 0.1): S(A ≥ AT) = 1 and S(A < AT) = 0. We do this for both the original (S) and recovered ( S) images. This operation selects either bright or dark features in the images. Then, using these transformed images, we compute the IQ parameter per cent as follows: N(cid:88) i=1 IQ = 100% N [Si Si + (1 − Si)(1 − Si)]. (6) Fig. 2.- Geometry of a planet orbiting a star: y and z axis are in the plane of the sky, x axis is toward the observer (perpendicular to the page). Planet axis inclination ir = 60◦, orbit normal inclination io = 30◦, and orbit normal azimuth ζo = 30◦, the star-planet system is unresolved, the stellar light is added to the planet reflected flux. Since the stellar flux is in general variable (e.g., due to magnetic activity or oscillations) during the planet orbital period, it is impor- tant to have observing tools to disentangle planetary and stellar variability. In general this is possible because 1) the starlight spectral and polarization characteristics are different from those of the planet, and 2) if the star is resolved from the planet, its variability can be separately measured. We define the star-planet geometry in a Cartesian frame with the axis x toward observer and y and z in the plane of sky (Fig. 2). The planet is assumed to rotate around its axis and orbits its star with different periods, Pr and Po, respectively. The rotational axis of the planet is generally inclined with respect to the observer with the angle ir. Thus, the xyz location on the planet surface is transformed into x(cid:48)y(cid:48)z(cid:48) by rotation by the angle ir toward the observer. Here, x(cid:48) is the cosine of the angle between the local nor- mal and the direction to the observer at a given phase, which defines the visibility function V : the pixel is visible to the observer if V is positive, cf. x(cid:48) > 0. The normal direction to the orbit plane is defined by the inclination angle toward the observer io and an az- imuth angle ζo around axis z (within xy-plane). To com- pute the amount of stellar illumination, we are interested in knowing the direction toward the star for any planet pixel at any given phase. We assume that the planet is far enough from the star to neglect the stellar solid angle, i.e., radiation coming from the star is unidirec- tional. Thus, the (xo, yo, zo) direction to the star at a given orbital phase ϕo is transformed into x(cid:48) o by ro- tations first by the angle io and then by the angle ζo (Fig. 2). The cosine between the local normal to the planet surface and the direction toward the star in the observer reference frame defines the illumination function L: the pixel is illuminated by the star if L is positive, i.e. x(cid:48)x(cid:48) o + y(cid:48)y(cid:48) The planet reflected flux for given orbital and rota- o + z(cid:48)z(cid:48) oy(cid:48) oz(cid:48) o > 0. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 5 TABLE 1 Test inversion models for an Earth-like planet Model Mrot Mph EN3000 ES3000 EN200 EN400 60 60 20 20 50 50 10 20 SNR IQ SD [%] [%] 200 200 200 20 89 89 87 80 10 15 11 13 ing time, which defines the error of the restored pixel's albedo. In Fig. 3 two sensitivity maps are shown for model cases with large and small amount of data. When data sampling is sparse, large gaps in the sensitivity map become apparent. Since the geometry of the planetary orbit and the rotational axis direction with respect to the observer are fixed for a given exoplanet, the sensi- tivity map helps to optimize data sampling for the best inversion result. One more way to characterize the quality of the recov- ered map is to carry out inversion of a light curve for a uniform albedo map (e.g., A = 1) with the same set of the sampled phases and SNR as in the observed light curve. The resulting recovered map S1 provides a distri- bution of expected deviations from the true albedo val- ues for each pixel. These include limitations due to data sampling, visibility and illumination geometry, SNR, and the choice of the solution "goodness" criterion. Figure 4 shows an example inversion for the A = 1 map. 3. EXO-EARTH ALBEDO INVERSIONS In this section we present example simulations and in- versions for an Earth-like planet with continents, ocean and ice caps which allow for large albedo variations across the planetary surface. We demonstrate how the informa- tion encoded in the reflected light curve helps to resolve an accurate map of the exoplanet surface on the scale of continents. We also discuss limitations due to data noise, weather system evolution, and seasonal variations in the cloud and surface albedo. We characterize inver- sion results with the quality parameters introduced in Section 2.3 and investigate how the quality can be max- imized. We suggest that further improvements in the re- covered image quality can be achieved by using polarized light curves in addition to the flux measurements. Such data may be useful for obtaining other local parameters, like the phase function. In our tests, we vary the number of planet rotations per orbital period Mrot and the number of observed phases per planet rotation Mph as well as SNR, geometrical pa- rameters and cloud cover. As explained earlier, the total number of measurements is M = MrotMph. We employ monthly Earth maps produced by the NASA Earth Observatory (NEO) satellite missions (https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/). The geometrical albedo maps with no clouds are used in Section 3.1. The effect of seasonal surface albedo variations is analyzed in Section 3.2. To study the effect of variable cloud cover, we analyzed a combination of the cloudless albedo maps and monthly cloud cover maps weighted by correspond- ing filling factors in Section 3.3. We have rebinned the maps to the 6◦ × 6◦ grid, simu- lated light curves and carried out inversions as described Fig. 3.- Sensitivity maps for model cases with large (M =400) and small (M =10) amount of data. Observed phases are evenly distributed over the orbital period. The model geometry is the same as in Fig. 2. A lack of measurements results in a "spotty" pattern of the sensitivity. Lower latitudes lack information because of smaller projection area and sparse sampling. Fig. 4.- Distribution of deviations from the true albedo values A = 1 for a model with ir = 60◦, io = 30◦, and ζo = 60◦ shown in Fig. 2 and M =3000 as in models EN3000 and ES3000 (see Table 1.) Thus, IQ is the percentage of pixels in the recovered map having the albedo range coinciding with that in the origi- nal map. It is obvious that the IQ parameter depends on the chosen albedo threshold. We found however that for a successful inversion IQ variations with the threshold near the center of the albedo value distribution are not large. In the following section when discussing the inver- sion results, we will use the threshold albedo AT = 0.1. Another informative characteristic of the inversion suc- cess is the standard deviation (SD) of the recovered map with respect to the input map normalized to the maxi- mum albedo and expressed in percent. This provides an overall measure of the map goodness. We also compute a sensitivity map in order to eval- uate a relative distribution of the available information over the planetary surface. It is composed of products of the visibility and illumination functions summed over all observed phases: M(cid:88) Si = VijLij, (7) j=1 where i = 1, N runs over all planet pixels. Thus, Si is proportional to the number of photons reflected toward the observer by the i-th pixel during the total observ- 6 Berdyugina & Kuhn in Section 2. The employed models are summarized in Table 1. They are all computed with ir = 60◦, io = 30◦, and ζo = 60◦. 3.1. Cloudless Exo-Earths First, we verify that we can resolve planet surface fea- tures in both longitude and latitude under favorable con- ditions, i.e., we assume data with sufficient SNR, suffi- cient number of measurements, a favorable (but not un- likely) planet geometry, optically thin (at a given wave- length) atmosphere, and no clouds. Inversions for less favorable scenarios are presented in subsequent subsec- tions. We use the 6◦ × 6◦ surface grid for inversions, as it yields reasonable surface resolution and a comfortable computational effort. This grid has N = 1800 pixels (when ir = 90◦) which implies that the measurement number M should be of the same order for a realistic so- lution. We note that our algorithm also converges when N > M but errors increase. For the first test, we assume that it is possible to obtain planet brightness measurements at 50 evenly spaced axial rotational phases with a SNR=200. The orbital period is assumed to be equal to 60 planetary rotations, resulting in a total of M = 3000 measurements. This case may be representative of an Earth-like planet in a WHZ of K-M dwarfs. As two relevant examples, we carry out inver- sions for a planet with the terrestrial topography visible either from the North or South poles: models EN3000 and ES3000. Here we used the albedo map for March 2003, which shows some snow fields on the northernmost landmasses and large areas of green vegetation. The inversion results for these models are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. They successfully recover about 90% of the continental land mass with A > 0.1 and the relative standard deviation of 10–15%. The shape of the continents and their large-scale albedo features (subcontinents) are resolved on the scale of Australia and Sahara. This demonstrates the power of our algorithm. To investigate the sensitivity of the inversion quality to the geometrical parameters, we have simulated a grid of models over a range of planet axial and orbital inclina- tions. Inversion results for these models are summarized graphically in Fig. 7. The plots show the dependence of the IQ (Eq. 6) and SD parameters on the inclination an- gles. Overall our inversion algorithm performs very well at a large range of inclination angles, except for their ex- treme values: the median values of IQ and SD are 86% and 12%, respectively. At higher planet axis inclination (≥ 80◦), it becomes more difficult to distinguish between the upper and lower planet hemispheres. A combination of low ir with high io (like Uranus in the Solar system seen on a near edge-on orbit) is also not favorable for rotational surface imaging. However, if both ir are io are low, rotational modulation still produces enough signal for a reasonable inversion. There is a particularly fa- vorable combination – a "sweet spot" – where inversions are most successful due to a good variety of geometrical constraints on visibility and illumination of pixels: near ir = 50◦ to 70◦ and io of 30◦ to 70◦. 3.2. Seasonal Variations When the planet rotational axis is inclined with respect to the orbital plane, like for the Earth, one can expect Fig. 5.- Original (top, for March 2003) and recovered albedo map (middle), and light curve (bottom) for the model EN3000 (see Table 1). The original map is used to simulate the "observed" light curve (blue symbols). The solid red line light curve is the best fit model corresponding to the recovered map. Error bars of the simulated data are smaller than the symbol size. seasonal reflected light fluctuations due to varying snow, cloud, and biomass surface cover. In this section we ana- lyze light curves generated from series of monthly Earth albedo maps, but yet without clouds. We consider two ways to evaluate this effect. First, we combine 12 subsequent monthly maps (for the year 2003) and carry out inversion of a year-long light curve. Hence, seasonal variations are treated as systematic noise, and the inversion delivers an average planet albedo map. This map should be compared with the average of the 12 input maps weighted by the illu- mination fraction. Such weighting is necessary because the solution will be dominated by maps seen near the maximum illumination phase (i.e., near the maximum brightness of the light curve). The result for this test is shown in Fig. 8, with the same planet parameters as for the EN3000 model. As expected, the quality of the re- stored map is reduced because of unaccounted systematic differences in the simulated and best-fit light curves. Second test is to use the same simulated input as in the first test but to carry out inversions on parts of the light curve. With sufficient amount of measurements, one can infer maps for different orbital phases and investigate season progression on the planet. If such variations are found, they may help to constrain the inclination of the rotational axis of the planet. The results of such tests are shown in Fig. 9. The quality is obviously reduced as compared to the EN3000 model because of the smaller amount of data. In addition, only parts of the planet surface could be inferred because of limiting illumina- Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 7 Fig. 6.- The same as in Fig. 5 for the model ES3000. Fig. 7.- Dependence of the IQ parameter (Eq. 6) and map standard deviation SD on the planet and orbit inclination angles ir and io for the model EN3000. High values are in light tones, and low values are in dark tones. The median values of IQ and SD are 86% and 12%. Fig. 8.- Seasonal variation effects in a year-long light curve. Top: weighted average of the 12 input albedo maps for the year 2003. Middle: recovered average albedo maps. Bottom: simulated (crosses) and best-fit (line) light curves. Error bars of the simulated data are smaller than the symbol size. IQ=84%, SD=11%. tion at particular orbital phases. However, this exercise demonstrates that useful information on the planet sur- face structures can be obtained even from partial light- curve inversions. 3.3. Partially Cloudy Exo-Earths Planets with liquid water on the surface will most prob- ably experience a water cycle as on the Earth. This im- plies that clouds will be forming seasonally and sporadi- cally, creating various weather conditions. To investigate how the information content in the recovered exoplanet albedo map depends on the cloud cover, we have com- puted several cases with various cloud coverages. As in Section 3.2, we have combined 12 subsequent monthly maps for the year 2003 and augmented them with corresponding monthly cloud cover maps (also from the NEO website). The cloud maps were considered as masks with each pixel being the cloud filling factor fc. The filling factor of the cloudless surface was correspond- ingly reduced by the factor 1 − fc. In addition, we have scaled the cloud cover by a global factor in order to quan- tify how optical thickness of clouds affects our ability to see the planet surface. As indicated above, the recov- ered map is to be compared with the average of the 12 input maps (with seasonal variations of both the sur- face albedo and cloud cover) weighted by the illumina- tion fraction. Two test results are shown in Fig. 10, with the same planet parameters as for the EN3000 model and global scaling of cloud coverage by factors of 0.1 and 0.3. As expected, the quality of the restored planet surface albedo maps is significantly reduced for heavily clouded 8 Berdyugina & Kuhn Fig. 9.- The same as Fig. 8 but for 3-month light curves. Top left: months 1-3, IQ=83%, SD=17%. Top right: months 4-6, IQ=82%, SD=12%. Bottom left: months 7-9, IQ=84%, SD=13%. Bottom right: months 10-12, IQ=89%, SD=13%. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 9 planets. However, longer series of measurements should reveal high-contrast surface features in more detail. If clouds dominate the planet albedo, the cloud distri- bution and thickness can be detected on such planets. In this case, rotational variation amplitude reduces, and the cloud light curve signal approaches that of a homo- geneous sphere, as shown in Fig. 4. The recovered cloud distribution and thickness can provide additional con- straints on the exoplanet climate and heat circulation in its atmosphere. The cloud physical and chemical com- position can be retrieved with the help of polarization measurements as discussed in Section 3.6. 3.4. Limited Data Inversions The inversion technique is surprisingly forgiving of S/N ratio and number of observation points. In this section, we investigate how inversions perform under less favor- able conditions. Here we compute the inversion with a reduced number of observations per planet rotation period, such as: Mrot is reduced to 20 and Mph is reduced to 10, and vice versa, when Mrot=10 Mph = 20. Hence, the total amount of measurements in both cases is 200, well below N (model EN200 in Table 1). The geometrical parameters are the same as before, and the orinal map is for March 2003. Despite this difference in Mrot and Mph, these two cases result in maps of similar quality. In Fig. 11 we show one of these cases. It is only somewhat poorer as compared to the "ideal" inversion presented in Fig. 5. The major part of the landmass is recovered with realistic albedo contrast (but without some details) with IQ=87% and SD=11%. We conclude that it is the total number of measurements, not necessarily the number of measure- ments during a single exoplanet day that encodes the latitudinal information. It is also interesting to see how the measurement S/N affects the output images. The case for Mrot = Mph = 20 and SNR=20 is shown in Fig. 12 (model EN400 in Table 1). Here, the fraction of the recovered continent land mass is reduced to 80% and SD to 13%, and many details are missing. However, even with this low SNR, there is a high-contrast spatial structure that we could interpret as evidence of a continental water world. 3.5. Geometrical Parameter Retrieval The light curve contains more information than just an albedo map or cloud cover. It strongly depends on the geometrical parameters of the system. Therefore, it is possible to retrieve the albedo map as well as the orbital and planetary axis angles io, ζo and ir. Here we retrieve these angles by carrying out inversions and minimizing the discrepancy between the "observed" and modelled light-curves within the angle domain. We have found that a high SNR light curve (100 or more) allows for a quite accurate retrieval of the angles. An example for SNR=200 is shown in Fig. 13. Obviously, noisier data yield weaker constraints on both the albedo map and angles. For instance, for SNR < 30, even if the albedo map can be reasonably retrieved, there is simply not enough information to create a surface map without independent information about the planet geometrical parameters. In fact, both the inclination and azimuth of the orbit can be evaluated from direct imag- ing data even in such noisier data, if the planet is well- resolved from the star. The planet's sky projected posi- tion with respect to the star changes over the course of its orbit, and the shape and orientation of this projected trajectory constrain the io and ζo angles as well as its eccentricity (astrometric orbit). When this information is employed, the retrieval procedure can successfully con- verge to the true planet axis inclination angle even at low SNRs. An example of such a case is shown in Fig. 14. 3.6. Polarized Reflected Light With few assumptions the reflected planetary light will be linearly polarized, in some cases at the 10% or larger level. From Earth-like planets the light is polar- ized mostly due to scattering by molecules (Rayleigh), droplets or particles (clouds) in their atmospheres or re- flection from the land or ocean surface (Coffeen 1979). In contrast, the direct stellar light, instrument and seeing- scattered starlight will have a much smaller linear polar- ization than the angularly resolved exoplanet – in many cases smaller than 10−5. We will consider linearly po- larized light-curve inversions in detail in a future paper, but suffice it here to note that there is considerably more information in the polarized exoplanet light-curves. For example, the Stokes Q and U linearly polarized ex- oplanet light are sensitive to orbital parameters (Fluri & Berdyugina 2010), but eliminate the residual scattered starlight that generally contaminates the exoplanet pho- tometry. Illumination variation due to, for example, el- liptical orbits can also be accounted for in polarization inversion. Also, the mean component of the exoplanet rotationally modulated light polarization direction can provide the exoplanet's rotation axis inclination geome- try independent of details of the surface albedo map. More interestingly, the exoplanet scattered light polar- ization angle is sensitive to the exoplanetary scatterer's latitude and longitude, in a way that is completely inde- pendent from the corresponding unpolarized flux. This provides an additional constraint on the albedo map that is distinct from the seasonal and diurnal brightness vari- ations. Finally, reflection from the surface introduces polarized spectral features which can help to identify surface com- position (Br´eon et al. 2002) and biosignatures (Berdyug- ina et al. 2016). To distinguish true surface features from those of clouds, one has to use polarimetry simultane- ously with flux measurements. In this case, it is pos- sible to determine the scattering phase function, since polarization is strongly dependent on the scattering an- gle and properties of scatterers (cloud particles, surface fine structure, vegetation, rocks, etc.). While leaving the subject of polarized light curve in- version for another paper, we expect that using polarized light will improve the sensitivity and allow inversion for other atmospheric and surface properties. 4. SOLAR SYSTEM ALBEDO INVERSIONS In this section, we present inversions for some of the Solar system planets and moons as analogs of exoplan- ets. We demonstrate how our EPSI technique can recover global circulation cloud patterns as well as solid surface features without a surrounding low-albedo ocean. For our tests we employ high-resolution composite "photographs" of planets and moons delivered by var- 10 Berdyugina & Kuhn Fig. 10.- The same as Fig. 8 but for the input maps including contributions from monthly cloud coverage maps. The global cloud cover has been reduced (as compared to the measurements on the Earth) by the factor 0.1 (left, IQ=74%, SD=10%) and 0.3 (right, IQ=78%, SD=13%). Fig. 11.- The same as in Fig. 5 but for the model EN200: Mrot = 10, Mph = 20, SNR=200, IQ=87%, SD=11%. Fig. 12.- The same as in Fig. 5 but for the model EN400: Mrot = Mph = 20, SNR=20, IQ=80%, SD=13%. Error bars of the simulated data are shown with vertical lines. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 11 red spot is better visible. 4.1. Planets with Thick Clouds Dense planetary atmospheres have vigorous circulation imprinted in their cloud pattern, like in zones, belts, vortices, jets, etc., on Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, etc. 3D models predict similar patterns to exist on exoplanets too (e.g., Heng & Showman 2015; Amundsen et al. 2016; Komacek & Showman 2016). Hence, images of Solar sys- tem planets with clouds can be used as a good example for testing our inversion technique to map the albedo of planetary atmospheres with a thick cloud deck. In this section, we employ images of Jupiter, Neptune, and Venus for such tests. The original and recovered images for cloudy planets are shown in Fig. 15. The details for each planet are presented in the following subsections. We note that particles in dense clouds are usually larger than the wavelength of the optical light. There- fore, the Rayleigh approximation is not useful, and the Mie approximation is applicable only for spherical parti- cles. In gas giants, such as Jupiter and Neptune, parti- cles are generally nonspherical (ices) and require compli- cated phase functions. Therefore, the shape of their light curves is also affected by phase functions (e.g., Dyudina et al. 2016). In this section, for simplicity, when generat- ing flux light curves from cloudy Solar system planets and applying inversions to them, we assume that clouds scat- ter isotropically with their geometrical albedo to be re- covered by the inversion routine at different wavelengths. Thus, our first goal is to investigate how precisely low- contrast cloud structures can be recovered by the EPSI technique. 4.1.1. Jupiter For Jupiter, we employ a global, high-resolution RGB map constructed using the Hubble telescope as a part of the OPAL project (Simon et al. 2015). We have extracted from this image a part with bright zones and the Great Red Spot (GRS) within the latitudes of ±60◦ and longi- tudes of ±90◦. Then, a full surface map from this part was constructed by rebinning it to the 6◦ × 6◦ grid for all longitudes and latitudes. The Jupiter average visible geometrical albedo of 0.52. Correspondingly, after nor- malization, the average albedos of the individual RGB images are about 0.6, 0.5 and 0.4, respectively. These are close to measured values for Jupiter (Karkoschka 1994). We have used this reduced, normalized, and rebinned RGB image for our inversions as an example of exoplan- ets with a global circulation cloud pattern. Also, we made it visible from the south pole, so that the GRS is well seen at higher latitudes. The GRS is well recov- ered as well as the zones (bright clouds) and belts (dark clouds), see Fig. 15. The overall result is very encourag- ing, since we can study directly hydrodynamics of thick atmospheres for angularly resolved Jupiter-like gas giants already now, with existing telescopes (see Section 7. 4.1.2. Neptune We employ the RGB Neptune map obtained with the NASA Voyager mission, which discovered the Great Dark Spot (GDS) and traces of clouds at different heights in a highly windy atmosphere. Such spots (vortices) are long-lived but still transient features in the Neptune at- mosphere. As for Jupiter, we used a part of the map with Fig. 13.- Retrievals of the angles io and ir for the model EN3000 (SNR=200) by minimizing the discrepancy between the "observed" and modelled light-curves within the angle domain. The plots show inverse of light-curve standard deviations (LCSD). True values of the angles are marked with crosses. Contours show 67% confidence levels. Fig. 14.- Retrievals of io only for the model EN3000 with SNR=10–100. The vertical axis shows inverse of light-curve stan- dard deviations (LCSD). The true value is marked with a dashed vertical line. ious space missions and telescopes. From each such a true-color image we extract three images for red, green and blue (RGB) bands. These images are normalized to the planet average visible geometrical albedo. Then, corresponding RGB light-curves are simulated and in- verted. A composite image constructed from RGB re- covered maps allows then for studying chemical compo- sition of spatially resolved surface features by means of low-resolution spectral analysis. Our inversions in this section assume Mrot = 60, Mph = 50, SNR=200, ir = 60◦, io = 30◦, and ζo = 60◦. Only for Jupiter we assume ir = 30◦, so that its famous 12 Berdyugina & Kuhn Fig. 15.- Albedo maps for the Solar system planets with thick clouds. In the first column, are original RGB maps of higher resolution, in the second column are original maps rebinned to the 6◦ × 6◦ grid in a particular band, and in the third column are recovered maps in the same band. The assumed geometrical parameter values are ir = 60◦, io = 30◦, and ζo = 30◦, except for Jupiter ir = 30◦. The original rebinned maps are used to simulate the "observed" light curve from which recovered images are obtained using inversions. the GDS at a visible latitude. The optical geometrical albedo of Neptune is 0.41, but it is much brighter in the blue because of Rayleigh scattering and strong methane absorption in the red wavelengths. The GDS is well recovered but traces of clouds are be- low the reconstruction resolution (Fig. 15). This example illustrates that blue planets may have transient vortices, which are detectable in a blue passband. 4.1.3. Venus Clouds Venus is a cloud-enshrouded rocky planet, with clouds made of sulfuric acid droplets. It is possible that quite a few rocky exoplanets at closer distances than the in- ner edge of the WHZ are completely covered by clouds as Venus, with a strong green-house effect. Venus upper clouds have a transient structure driven by fast winds (jets) in its atmosphere, so the entire atmosphere rotates in only four Earth days and in the opposite direction, as compared to the 243 Earth day surface rotation. We employed the RGB image of the Venus upper clouds ob- tained by the NASA Galileo spacecraft. The Venus cloud optical geometrical albedo is very high, 0.69. The cloud structure on Venus is different from that on Jupiter, Neptune and other gas giants (Fig. 15). It is encouraging that our indirect imaging can distin- guish between different cloud structures and provide in- sights unto global circulation of atmospheres on rocky and gas giant planets. 4.2. Solid Surfaces of Planets and Moons For planets with transparent atmospheres or without atmospheres at all we can recover images of their sur- face albedo variations, as we demonstrated above for the Earth. Here we look at several Solar system planets and moons with interesting surface features. They generally reveal history of meteoroid bombardment and geological (tectonic or volcanic) activity. Our results are compiled in Fig. 16, and details for each planet are presented in following subsections. The Solar system moons are used here only to illustrate how an exoplanet with similar sur- face features can be studied (detecting and imaging an exoplanet moon would generally require much larger tele- scopes). 4.2.1. Mars Mars can be considered as an analog of cold rocky planets beyond the stellar WHZ. It has seasons, polar ice caps and a very thin, transparent atmosphere, al- lowing a clear view of the planet surface in the optical. On the surface there are volcanoes, canyons, and traces Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 13 Fig. 16.- Albedo maps for surfaces of some Solar system planets and moons. In the first column, are original RGB maps of higher resolution, in the second column are original maps rebinned to the 6◦ × 6◦ grid in a particular band, and in the third column are recovered maps in the same band. The assumed geometrical parameter values are ir = 60◦, io = 30◦, and ζo = 30◦. The original rebinned maps are used to simulate the "observed" light curve from which recovered images are obtained using inversions. 14 Berdyugina & Kuhn of earlier floods. The polar ice caps vary with seasons. The optical geometrical albedo is quite low, 0.17. We employed an RGB map of Mars obtained by the NASA Viking missions. When rebinned to the 6◦ × 6◦ grid, it still shows well the largest volcano in the solar system, Olympus Mons, as well as a large equatorial canyon sys- tem, Valles Marineris. Shapes of dark dusty areas and bright highlands, in- cluding Olympus Mons, are well-recovered in the R-band image. If the top of Olympus Mons was covered by snow, it would be quite conspicuous (see, for example a recon- struction of volcanos on Io in Section 4.2.4). Thus, sea- sonal variations of the albedo on exoplanets like Mars can be studied with the EPSI. 4.2.2. Venus Surface The Venus surface is not visible in the optical because of thick clouds. Its map is obtained using radar mea- surements. Under the clouds, the surface looks orange because red light passes through the atmosphere. The surface is hot, and structures are relatively small-scale because of regular resurfacing. Features include craters from large meteoroids, because only those can reach and impact the surface, multiple volcanos, and some high- lands. For our reconstruction we have assumed that the surface optical albedo is the same as for Mercury, 0.14, and that the surface can be seen through a transparent atmosphere. Variations of the albedo of different structures are quite well reconstructed, including large-scale dark and bright areas with some substructures. Volcanos are quite small and are not resolved in the recovered image. However, if volcanic activity affected a larger area, that could be recovered (like on the Moon or Io, see the next section). Thus, time series of such indirect images of active exo- planets will allow studying volcanic activity and chemical composition of the new lava through multi-band spectral imaging, as discussed for biosignatures and technisigna- tures in Section 5. 4.2.3. Moon The Moon is an interesting analog of an exoplanet without an atmosphere. It is highly cratered, similar to Mercury, but it also has large areas of lighter highlands and darker maria filled with volcanic lava some billions years ago. The light and dark areas have different com- position. The optical albedo of the Moon is 0.12, similar to that of Mercury. The overall shapes of the large-scale brighter and darker areas are well reconstructed. Such variety of the albedo on exoplanets without an atmosphere may help reveal the history of their formation and volcanic activ- ity, as well as the composition of various areas. 4.2.4. Io The Jupiter moon Io can be an analog of a very vol- canically active exoplanet. Volcanic lava fills in impact craters and spreads over the surface, which is constantly renewed. Vivid surface colors of Io revealed by the NASA Galileo and Voyager missions are cased by silicates and various sulfurous compounds. In particular, volcanic plum deposits can be white, due to sulfur dioxide frost, or red, due to molecular sulfur. We have employed a detailed RGB map of Io obtained by the Galileo mission. We made it visible from the South pole of the moon, so that interesting surface features are in the view. The optical geometrical albedo used is 0.45. Large-scale, active volcanic areas are well reconstructed. In particular, the volcano Pele distinguished by a large circular red plum deposit (in the upper left part of the map) is well seen in the recovered image. Bright vol- canic slopes covered by sulfur dioxide frost, such as Tar- sus R. (in the upper right part of the map), are also well recovered. We did not attempt it, but it seems possi- ble that large volcanic plums forming umbrella-shaped clouds of volcanic gases can also be detected with our imaging technique, if they last long enough. Discovering and imaging such geologically active exo- planets will be valuable for studying their internal com- position. Complementary images in the infrared will help to determine temperature and age of volcanic deposits. 4.2.5. Pluto Pluto is an icy, rocky dwarf planet which may serve as an analog of exoplanets and planetesimals beyond the so-called frost line distance from the host star. Images of the Pluto delivered by the NASA New Horizons mis- sion reveal spectacular glaciers of frozen methane, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen. Extended dark surface features are possibly due to tholins (Sagan & Khare 1979), which are common on surfaces of icy outer Solar system bodies and formed by UV or energetic particle irradiation of a mixture of nitrogen and methane. The optical geometri- cal albedo used is 0.49. The surface of Pluto was found to have unexpected tectonic activity indicated by large craters with degradation and infill by cryomagma. Since the New Horizons map of Pluto is incomplete, we assigned to the missing part a constant intermedi- ate value albedo. Also, we made the planet visible from the pole with a detailed map, so that the missing part is basically invisible with a given inclination angle. All large-scale structures, including the brightest glacier and tholin-rich areas are well reconstructed. This is promis- ing for detecting and stydying cryovolcanic activity on icy exoplanets. 5. BIOSIGNATURES AND TECHNOSIGNATURES In this section, we present models for spectral (broad- band) imaging of exoplanets, with the same parameters as in Section 4. We demonstrate that, for example, pho- tosynthetic biosignatures and inorganic surface compo- sition can be detected using EPSI. We also model hy- pothetical planets with global artificial structures which can be detected under certain circumstances. 5.1. Spectral Imaging of Biosignatures Detecting biosignatures on exo-Earths is an ultimate goal of modern exoplanet studies. In most cases, this requires an analysis of the spectral content of the re- flected, emitted or/and absorbed flux from an exoplanet. For example, detecting spectral signatures of biogenic (or simply out-of-equilibrium) gases in exoplanetary at- mospheres is a promising approach (e.g., Grenfell et al. 2013). Positive atmospheric detections will help select promising candidates, but definite conclusions for exolife detection will require complementary studies to exclude false-positives. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 15 green vegetation. We have carried out inversions of the four RGB+NIR images separately, and obtained recovered images as de- scribed in this paper. The input and output images are shown in Fig. 19. Under the favorable observing condi- tions, the quality of the recovered images is quite good. When combined in a "true"-color photograph, the re- covered RGB-image outlines quite remarkably the polar ice-cap and continents with large desert and vegetation areas (see Fig. 17, lower panel). By resolving surface features, spectra of various areas can be extracted and explored for life signatures. An example average spectrum of a small green area at mid- latitudes in the eastern part of the planet is shown in the left panel of Fig. 18, for both the input and recovered images. A geographically resolved spectrum with a deep absorption in the visible and high albedo in the NIR has been recovered very well. It reveals quite strikingly the presence of the chlorophyll-rich organisms with the distinct red-edge signature typical for green plants and cyanobacteria. Thus, using spatially resolved images of exoplanets dramatically increases our chances to detect exolife, because we can carry out a spectral analysis of areas with high concentrations of living organisms, which is necessary for unambiguous detection (see models with various biopigments in Berdyugina et al. 2016). In the right panel of Fig. 18, we show an example spec- trum of a desert area, whose composition can be recov- ered using spectra of various minerals. 5.2. Artificial Mega-Structures of Advanced Civilizations The EPSI technique allows also for detecting artificial mega-structures (AMS) constructed by advanced civi- lizations either on the surface or in the near-space of an exoplanet. We consider AMS to be of some "recog- nizable" shape and/or homogeneous albedo, and most probably to be "geostationary". We have previously de- scribed how the thermal footprint of a civilization only slightly more advanced than that of Earth's could be de- tectable at IR wavelengths from its planetary rotation signature (Kuhn & Berdyugina 2015). Since advanced civilizations would depend on stellar power sources to avoid planetary warming, it is likely that the low albedo stellar energy collectors should be detectable using the mapping technique described here. One example of such low-albedo installations is sim- ilar to our photovoltaic systems on the Earth's surface and in space. Such structures would absorb stellar light with high efficiency in particular spectral bands. In fact, spectral signatures of such alien photovoltaics could be of similar shapes to those of various biopigments (see Fig. 18 and Berdyugina et al. (2016)), depending on the alien technology, energy needs, and the available stellar light before or after it passes through the planetary at- mosphere. Another example would be high-albedo installations, also on the surface or in the near-space, in order to redi- rect the incident stellar light, e.g., for heat mitigation by reflecting the light back to space. Such installations may reflect only a particular part of the spectrum, because the amount of the reflected energy can be regulated by both the size of the structure and the width of the spectral band. Fig. 17.- The RGB composite original and recovered maps of an exo-Earth with continents, ocean and a polar cap. Continents are in part are covered by green photosynthetic organisms and in part by deserts. Fig. 18.- Average spectra of selected areas from the images in Fig.17. Left: spectra of a small green area at mid latitudes in the eastern part of the planet image. Right: spectra of a small desert area at lower latitudes in the western part of the planet image. Solid lines are the original image spectra. Dashed lines show a range of "natural" variations within the area in the original image. Symbols depict spectra from the recovered image. The presence of chlorophyll-rich organisms is unambiguously detected. The com- position of the desert surface can be recovered by a comparison with spectra of minerals. Here we propose such a complementary approach us- ing our surface imaging technique applied to exoplanet light curves measured in several spectral bands or us- ing an efficient spectrograph. We show in this Section that a "true"-color map of exoplanets inferred with our surface imaging technique could provide a powerful tool for detecting surface-based living organisms, in particu- lar photosynthetic organisms which have dominated the Earth for billions years. We test our approach using a composite RGB image of Earth's surface samples: ice polar caps, ocean reflecting blue sky, deserts, and forest. This image is shown in Fig. 17 (top panel). We complement this RGB image with a near-infrared (NIR) image (0.75–0.85 µm) using our laboratory study of various organic and inorganic samples (Berdyugina et al. 2016). In particular, the most striking feature of the IR image is high reflectance by the 16 Berdyugina & Kuhn Fig. 19.- The same as Fig. 5 but for the input maps in the four RGB+NIR bands from an exo-Earth image shown in the top panel of Fig. 17. The RGB composite of the recovered images is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 17. The map quality indexes are IR: IQ=82%, SD=16%; R: IQ=86%, SD=15%; G: IQ=88%, SD=15%; B: IQ=86%, SD=25%. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 17 Fig. 22.- Average spectra of the artificial mega-structures shown in Figs. 20 and 21. The solid lines and symbols show original and recovered spectra, respectively. Red and blue colors stand for spectra of the high- and low-albedo, respectively. Our model AMS are shown in Figs. 20 and 21, im- itating a photovoltaic-like power-plant in space, above clouds, and urban-like areas under reflective "umbrellas" on a planet surface under a cloudless atmosphere. These numerical simulations show that recognizing AMS in in- ferred images requires quite large areas covered by AMS, because of uneven illumination and limited spatial resolu- tion. Also, higher contrast structures with respect to the natural environment are obviously much more conspicu- ous and easier to infer than structures with the albedo similar to that of the environment. Distinguishing such AMS from the high and low albedo natural environments (e.g., bright ice caps and mountain tops, dark lava fields and water reservoirs, etc.) may be a challenge unless they have a regular structure (like a power-plant). Also, analyzing the spectral content of the reflected light can be useful. As mentioned above, the reflectance of AMS can be limited to particular wave- lengths. As examples, in Fig. 22 we show the input and recovered spectra of the AMS with absorbing and reflect- ing panels. The stationary nature of AMS could also be an important factor in their identification. 6. PROXIMA B AND THE ALPHA CENTAURI SYSTEM The Alpha Centauri system stars A and B and Prox- ima Centauri are the closest stars to the Sun. There is at least one exoplanet discovered so far in this sys- tem – Proxima b (Anglada-Escud´e et al. 2016). Gas giant, Jupiter-like planets are concluded to be incompat- ible with the present measurements (Endl et al. 2015). Proxima b is an excellent candidate for first-time exo- planet surface imaging. Proxima b orbits the M5 red dwarf within its WHZ with the period of about 11.2 days at about 0.04 AU from the star. At this close distance, tidal interactions may have locked the axial rotation of the planet to its orbital period or to the 3:2 resonance as for Mercury. The presence of a dense atmosphere may influence the tidal interaction too (Kreidberg & Loeb 2016). In this section, we present simulations and inversions for the Proxima b planet assuming tidally locked orbits at the 1:1 and 2:3 resonances. with the planetary axis inclined with respect to the orbit plane. Since Proxima b was discovered using the radial veloc- ity (RV) technique and so far no transits were detected, Fig. 20.- The RGB composite original and recovered maps of an exo-Earth with the artificial mega-structure of low albedo (0.05) above clouds, imitating a photovoltaic-like power-plant in space. Fig. 21.- The RGB composite original and recovered maps of an exo-Earth with the artificial mega-structure of high albedo (0.9), imitating urban-like areas under reflective "umbrellas" (white cir- cles). We have simulated examples of exoplanets with AMS of the high and low albedo combined with natural envi- ronment, similar to the Earth. Light curves were simu- lated in the RGB passbands and inverted separately, as described in previous sections for natural albedo varia- tions. The final images were obtained by combining the individual RGB light curve images into "true"-color im- ages. 18 Berdyugina & Kuhn the inclination of the orbit is still unknown. Thus, the planet can be an Earth-like planet of 1.3 − 1.5ME at io of 90◦ − 60◦, a super-Earth of 1.6 − 5ME at io of 55◦−15◦, or a Uranus/Neptune-mass planet of 15−17ME at io ≈ 5◦. Extremely low orbit inclinations io < 5◦ (a nearly face-on orbit) are still possible with a few per- cent chance, which may lead up to a Saturn-mass planet at io ≈ 1◦. The composition and, hence, the surface (or cloud) albedo of such planets may differ significantly. Therefore, obtaining albedo maps (especially at differ- ent wavelengths/passbands) can provide a powerful con- straint on the planet mass and composition as well as its potential habitability. As in Section 3.1, we test our inversion technique for Proxima b parameters using cloudless Earth's albedo maps. We assume the orbit inclination of 60◦ correspond- ing to a 1.5 ME planet. With the terrestrial mean density of 5.5 g/cm3 its radius would be 1.15 RE, which we use in our reflected light simulations. Here, the SNR=100 is assumed. The two scenarios when the planet rotation is locked to the orbital motion at the 1:1 and 3:2 resonances are shown in Fig. 23 Fig. 24, respectively. The fact that the periods are the same or very close hinders the amount of information in the light curve, even though we allow ob- servations during several orbital periods. However, most of the landmass (80%) is still recovered and its outline is quite recognizable. The quality of the map is higher for the 3:2 resonance orbit because there are two different light-curves observed every other orbital period. Here, the number of measurements and the SNR can be in- creased by observing during several orbital periods, as shown in our inversions. Since the rotational axis inclination angle and the orbit normal azimuth are unknown, we vary them to under- stand imaging capabilities of this planet, possibly locked at a resonance rotation. The IQ and SD parameters of our inversions for the periods locked at 1:1 are shown in Figs. 25. Similar to the unlocked case, the most favor- able planet axis inclination angles range within 30◦ to 60◦, while the orbit normal azimuth angle can be in a wide range. 7. OBSERVATIONAL REQUIREMENTS In this section, we investigate and formulate observa- tional requirements for the telescope size and scattered light level, in order to obtain spectral images of Prox- ima b and possible rocky planets in the nearest to the Sun stellar system Alpha Centauri A and B. We also es- timate how many Earth-size and super-Earth planets in WHZ can be imaged with our EPSI technique depend- ing on the telescope aperture for a given scattered light background. 7.1. Contrast Profile The level of the stellar scattered light, or contrast C with respect to the central star brightness, plays an im- portant role in the planet reflected light SNR. The re- quired SNR has to be achieved above the bright back- ground at the WHZ angular distance from the star, where an Earth-like planet may reside. This component of the SNR budget is missing in the computations made by Fujii & Kawahara (2012) and leads to unrealistic sensitivities. Fig. 23.- The same as in Fig. 5 for the Proxima b model with S/N=100 and the planet rotation being locked to the orbital mo- tion at the 1:1 resonance. The light curves is simulated as it would be observed during several (20) orbital periods with 30 phase mea- surements per period, i.e., N =600. Here IQ=80% and SD=13%. Fig. 24.- The same as in Fig. 23 for the 3:2 resonance. Here IQ=80% and SD=13%. Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 19 scaling this coronagraph/AO-limited curve to other tele- scopes. A representative contrast profile that varies with the angle θ from the central star, expressed in units of the ratio of the wavelength λ to the diameter D, is shown in Fig. 26. We emphasize that this contrast curve is achieved for a telescope with an unsegmented primary mirror. For a highly segmented primary mirror, without heroic seg- mented coronagraphy and speckle nulling AO, the con- trast curve suffers from scattering off the segment edges and may not reach even 10−5 contrast at the required angular separation. We expect that the contrast of Keck-style telescopes (with a multi-segmented primary mirror and a single sec- ondary mirror) will be worse than that of a unsegmented telescope by approximately a factor equal to the number of mirror segments in the full aperture. For example, we scale up the SPHERE C profile with the factors of 50, 500, and 800 to obtain rough estimates of SNR and num- ber of detectable WHZ planets using a Keck-, TMT- and EELT-like telescopes with segmented primary mirrors. On the other hand, recently proposed hybrid interfer- ometric telescopes, such as the 74m Colossus or 20m Ex- oLife Finder (ELF), can achieve contrast performance comparable to or even better than that of single-mirror telescopes (Kuhn et al. 2014; Moretto et al. 2014), at least in selected parts of their field of view (FOV). Such an optical system consists of an array of off-axis tele- scopes from a common parent parabola. Each off-axis telescope consists of the active primary and adaptive sec- ondary mirrors. They build a common focus pupil image with the angular resolution equivalent to the diameter of the telescope array. Analogous to the nulling inter- ferometry, independent off-axis apertures can be phased to "synthesize" a PSF with a dark hole of extremely low scattered light and speckle noise. This dark hole can be moved within the FOV to follow an exoplanet orbiting the star by readjusting the aperture phases. Therefore, for simplicity, we assume here that the contrast curve shown in Fig. 26 is also valid for a Colossus/ELF-type telescope at the location of an exoplanet. Another improvement of the telescope/coronagraph performance can be achieved by using polarimetry to enhance the contrast of polarized light reflected from a planet above the stellar background. This technique has been employed for detection and detailed studies of cir- cumstellar disks (e.g., Kuhn et al. 2001; Oppenheimer et al. 2008; Benisty et al. 2015; Follette et al. 2017) as well as exoplanets unresolved from their stars (Berdyug- ina et al. 2008, 2011). The direct imaging instruments SPHERE at VLT and GPI at Gemini have this option and are successful in imaging circumstellar disks and re- solved companions. An important contribution to the SNR budget for ground-based telescopes is the brightness of the sky. We have used sky magnitudes for the dark time at the ESO Paranal Observatory, Chile, by Patat (2008), while aver- aging variations due to the 11-year solar cycle. We note that the sky contribution is more important for fainter stars observed with smaller telescopes. As the aperture of the telescope increases, the size of the resolution el- ement decreases, and the sky contribution decreases as well. Thus, we compute the number of photons from three Fig. 25.- Dependence of the IQ parameter (Eq. 6) and map standard deviation SD on the planet axis inclination angles ir and the orbit normal azimuth ζo for the Proxima b model with the periods locked at 1:1. High values are in light tones, and low values are in dark tones. The median values of IQ and SD are 80% and 16%. Fig. 26.- An assumed contrast curve for the scattered stellar light brightness versus the angular distance from the star in units of the ratio of the wavelength λ to the telescope diameter D (for an unsegmented mirror telescope). The contrast reaches 10−7 at λ/D = 100. For reference, we take the contrast curve similar to the existing state-of-the-art performance achieved with the SPHERE imaging instrument at VLT (Langlois et al. 2014, 2017) using adaptive optics (AO), and spectral and angular differential imaging. We have also attempted to semi-quantitatively include the effects of wavefront phase errors, i.e., "speckle noise" (Aime & Soummer 2004) by 20 Berdyugina & Kuhn due to Fresnel sunlight reflection is very bright, but its relative contribution with respect to landmasses is low. We also note that because of the orbit inclination to the line of sight, the star-planet projected angular sep- aration varies with the orbital phase, leading to differ- ent C levels at different orbital phases. Hence, orbital phases near conjunctions will be hindered by higher C and, therefore, lower SNR for the same exposure time. For example, for the assumed orbit inclination of 60◦ for Proxima b the angular separation between the star and the planet varies by a factor of two, i.e., between 37 mas at maximum elongations and 18 mas near conjunctions. Thus, observing Proxima b near conjunction phases may require a telescope system with a larger resolving power or a better contrast at smaller θ angles, depending on the orbit inclination. The overall conclusion from this exercise is that a tele- scope with low scattered light, the effective diameter D ≥ 12 m, and an equivalent or larger angular resolv- ing power is required for detecting an Earth-like Prox- ima b above the star and sky background in the BVRI bands with SNR≥2 during 1,hr exposure time. A large telescope (≥ 20 m) is preferable for more efficient obser- vations. The BVRI band measurements are particularly inter- esting for detecting possible photosynthetic life signa- tures as described in Section 5.1 and Berdyugina et al. (2016). A 20m-class telescopes should be able to achieve SNR 5 to 20 in the BVRI-bands in 1h, at least near max- imum elongations of the planet. The R-band measure- ments during several orbital periods with SNR=20 will be already usable for surface inversions. With such a dedicated telescope in Chile, Proxima b can be observed between 3 to 7 hours/night during 6 months (February to July). Even when discarding 10% observing time for bad weather condition, one can obtain about 800 1h- measurements spread over 16 orbital periods within just one season. Observing in at least three adjacent pass- bands simultaneously (e.g., BVR or VRI) should be pos- sible for the successful operation of the adaptive optics system. Hence, after only one season of observations we will be able to obtain the first "color photographs" of Proxima b. If the planet is partially cloudy, several observing seasons are needed to filter out the cloud noise and obtain more detailed surface maps. If planet is completely covered by thick clouds or its surface is completely featureless, we will be able to conclude on its bulk properties already after a few orbital periods (1–2 months). 7.3. SNR for Alpha Centauri A and B potential planets A search for planets around the Alpha Centauri A and B components has already ruled out Jupiter-like planets in their WHZ (Endl et al. 2015), but there is still hope for smaller planets, which were not yet detected or ruled out due to sensitivity limits. If any planets in WHZ of these stars will be found, they will be excellent targets for our indirect surface imaging. We have computed the SNR diagram for an Earth- size planet with an average geometrical albedo 0.2 and at the half illumination orbital phase within the WHZ of the Alpha Centauri A and B stars – about 930 mas and 560 mas, respectively (see Fig. 28). Resolving the WHZ of these stars is theoretically possible even with a Fig. 27.- SNR curves for an Earth-like planet like Proxima b (see parameters in the text) depending on the effective telescope di- ameter, when assuming a single, unsegmented primary mirror. The SNR is computed for 1h exposure time in the UBVRI passbands, when only a half of the planet is illuminated. The assumed con- trast curve for the stellar scattered light is shown in Fig. 26. The planet average surface albedo in all bands is assumed to be 0.2 for simplicity, which allows to scale the SNR for other albedo values. Vertical dashed lines indicate effective diameters (unsegmented) of the existing and planned telescopes. The resolving power of the telescopes is assumed defined by the effective diameter. different sources: the planet itself, the scattered stellar background at a given angular separation from the star, and a sky background area equal to the resolution ele- ment of a given telescope aperture. In this way, in the following sections, we compute SNR for exoplanets in the standard Johnson UBVRI bands depending on the size of the telescope, using known stellar and planetary parameters. 7.2. SNR for Proxima b Achieving SNR=100 in the reflected light from an ex- oplanet is rather challenging even for the nearest exo- planet, such as Proxima b. Here we compute SNR in the UBVRI passbands for 1 hr exposure time, when assum- ing the telescope efficiency 25%, the illumination phase of the planet 0.5 (maximum elongation from the star), and the average surface albedo in all bands 0.2. The stellar magnitudes used are from the SIMBAD database. The result is shown in Fig. 27. Such a SNR computation produces photon-limited es- timates which can be considered as some realistic upper limit values. Systematic errors are usually specific to a particular instrument design and calibration and data re- duction procedures. Hence, we assume here the best case scenario, when all other errors are reduced down to the photon-noise level. In practice, to detect reflected light variability, one should also allow for smaller illumination phases (down to at least 0.1) and smaller surface albedo (down to 0.05). For example, the reflectance of vegeta- tion in the optical is about 0.05. The reflectance of rocky terrains and deserts is between 0.1 and 0.15, and that of the ocean is 0.1 in the blue (due to sky reflection) and less than 2% in the red and NIR. The glint on the ocean Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 21 1m class telescope, but achieving a significantly higher contrast level is needed for detecting Earth-size planets around these more luminous stars. Hence, such planets may remain undetectable in the optical or NIR with 8– 10m class telescopes, but they can be easily detected with a 20m-class telescope, assuming the contrast curve shown in Fig. 26. Our result suggests that formally, with a longer ex- posure time (≥10h), an Earth-like WHZ planet may be detected around Alpha Cen B with an 8 m telescope at SNR=5. In practice, however, systematic errors accu- mulated over several nights may prevent achieving the photon-limited SNR. Also, if the planetary orbit is copla- nar with the binary (AB) orbit, i.e., io ≈ 80◦, such a de- tection is only possible at planet maximum elongations from the star. Near the "full-moon" phase the planet- star angular separation is reduced by a factor of almost 6, which leads to a severe increase of the stellar light background and makes such a planet undetectable. Con- sidering that the orbit orientation on the sky plane is also unknown, the direct detection of an Earth-size planet in the WHZ of Alpha Cen B with an 8m-telescope may take a long time. Similar to the Proxima b case discussed in the previ- ous section, dedicated continuous direct imaging observa- tions of the Alpha Centauri A and B stars with a larger telescope may reveal (or exclude) Earth-size planets in their WHZ. Obviously, larger planets can be detected within shorter observing time, as the SNR increases with the size of the planet. The advantage here is that these planets will most probably have axial rotation periods different from the orbital periods (not tidally locked), which will allow for a more detailed surface mapping as presented in Section 3. 7.4. Number of Detectable Exoplanets Assuming the telescope and instrument performance as in Section 7.2, we can evaluate how many WHZ Earth- size planets in the solar neighbourhood can be poten- tially detected and surface-imaged. From the SIMBAD database, we have compiled a list of AFGKM main se- quence stars brighter than V = 13 magnitude (about 3500 stars). We have computed their WHZ distances by scaling the Sun-Earth WHZ with the stellar luminosity for an Earth-like planet. The reflected light flux is com- puted using the Earth size, geometrical albedo 0.2 for all passbands, and 0.5 illumination phase. We consider a planet detectable if SNR≥5 can be achieved during 4h exposure time. The number of Earth-size (1 RE) detectable planets is plotted for different telescope sizes and types in Fig. 29. The plot shows that a 20m-class telescope with the SPHERE-like performance (like the ELF) can detect and surface image a dozen of WHZ Earth-like planets. Hun- dreds of such planets in this magnitude-limited sample could be detected by a 70 m telescope (like the Colossus). However, we evaluate that most probably none of such planets can be detected by Keck-style telescopes with D < 45 m. The number of detectable super-Earths up to the Nep- tune size (4 RE) is plotted for different telescope sizes and types in Fig. 29. In this case, a 20m coronagraphic tele- scope can detect and image hundreds of planets, while all such planets can be discovered and imaged with a 60m Fig. 28.- The same as Fig. 27 but for α Cen A and B (top and bottom) hypothetical Earth-size planets residing in their cor- responding (liquid water) habitable zones. high-performance telescope. Multi-segmented Keck-style telescopes, such as TMT and EELT, should be able to collect enough photons above the stellar background for tens of such planets. Jupiter-size planets are more real- istic targets for such telescopes. 8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This paper demonstrates that for many exoplanets it is possible to map their surface or cloud structures us- ing reflected starlight analyzed with the ExoPlanet Sur- face Imaging (EPSI) technique. We have shown that time resolved exoplanet photometry (on the scale of a few percent of the exoplanet rotation period) and with the SNR of as low as 20, can yield enough information to, for example, detect continents on a water-rich world. With higher SNR it may be possible to trace the outline of continents and their large-scale albedo features, such 22 Berdyugina & Kuhn Fig. 29.- Number of detectable WHZ Earth-size planets (1 RE) in the BVR bands (SNR≥5) around AFGKM main sequence stars brighter than V = 13 magnitude. Solid lines are for unsegmented or interferometric telescopes which can achieve the contrast as shown in Fig. 26. Dotted, dashed and dashed-dotted lines are for Keck-type telescopes (segmented primary and single secondary mirrors) with the number of segments of 50, 500, and 800, respec- tively. Here, the exposure time is 4h, the planet albedo is 0.2 in all bands, illumination phase is 0.5. Fig. 30.- Same as Fig. 29 but for planets of 4 RE, which is about the size of Neptune. All such planets (and bigger ones) in the solar neighbourhood could be detected and surface imaged with a 70m Colossus-like telescope. as deserts, vegetation areas, snowfields, icecaps, etc., or even artifical "alien megastructures." Combining EPSI with spectrally resolved data may yield information about exoplanetary subcontinental- scale biomarkers. Planetary "noise" like clouds would limit such observations, but under some circumstances only by decreasing the surface albedo contrast. These data are within reach of the next generation of coronagraphic telescopes. For example a dedicated hy- brid telescope-interferometer of 12–20m diameter could generate surface maps in different colors for the nearest exoplanet, Proxima b, and a few others. Dozens of Earth- size exoplanets and hundreds of larger planets could be imaged this way with a hybrid telescope of 30m or larger diameter. SVB acknowledges the support by the ERC Advanced Grant HotMol (www.hotmol.eu). JRK acknowledges the support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany. REFERENCES Aime, C., & Soummer R., 2004, ApJ, 612, L85 Amundsen, D.S., Mayne, N.J., Baraffe, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, id.A36, 11 pp. Anglada-Escud´e, G., Amado, P.J., Barnes, J., et al. 2016, Nature, 536, 437 Benisty, M., Juhasz, A., Boccaletti, A., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, id. L6, 7 pp. Berdyugina, S. V., 1998, A&A, 338, 97 Berdyugina, S. V., Berdyugin, A. V., Ilyin, I., Tuominen, I., 1998, Br´eon, F.M., Buriez, J.C., Couvert, P., et al. 2002, Adv. Space Res., 30, 2383 Coffeen, D.L. 1979, JOSA, 69, 1051 Cowan, N.B., Agol, E. 2008, ApJ, 678, L129 Cowan, N.B., Agol, E., Meadows, V.S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 915 Crossfield, I.J.M., Hansen, B.M.S., Harrington, J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1436 Demory, B.-O., Seager, S., Madhusudhan, N., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, L12 A&A, 340, 437 Dyudina, U., Zhang, X., Li, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, id. 76, 10 Berdyugina, S. V., Pelt, J., Tuominen, I., 2002, A&A, 394, 505 Berdyugina, S.V., Berdyugin, A.V., Fluri, D.M., & Piirola, V. 2008, ApJ, 673, L83 Berdyugina, S.V., Berdyugin, A.V., Fluri, D.M., & Piirola, V. 2011, ApJ, 728, L6 Berdyugina, S.V., Kuhn, J.R., Harrington, D.M., Santl-Temkiv, T., Messersmith, E.J. 2016, International Journal of Astrobiology, 15, 45 Berdyugina, S.V. 2016, in Radiation mechanisms of astrophysical objects: classics today, eds. V.P. Grinin, H. Harutyunian, V.B. Il'in, A.F. Kholtygin, A. Nikoghossian, Edit Print Publ. House, p. 151 (arXiv:1607.06874) pp. Endl, M., Bergmann, Ch., Hearnshaw, J., et al. 2015, Int. J. Astrobiology, 14, 305 Evans, T.M., Pont, F., Sing, D.K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, L16 Faigler, S., Mazeh, T. 2015, ApJ, 800, id. 73, 10 pp. Fluri, D.M., & Berdyugina, S.V. 2010, A&A, 512, id.A59, 12 pp. Follette, K.B., Rameau, J., Dong, R., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, id. 264, 15 pp. Fujii, Y., & Kawahara, H., 2012, ApJ, 755, id. 101, 14pp. Grenfell, J.L., Gebauer, S., Godolt, M., Palczynski, K., Rauer, H., Stock, J., von Paris, P., Lehmann, R., Selsis, F. 2013, Astrobiology, 13, 415 Hansen, J.E., & Travis, L.D., 1974, Space Sci. Rev., 16, 527 Surface Imaging of Proxima b and Other Exoplanets 23 Harrington, J. Hansen, B.M., Luszcz, S.H., et al. 2006, Science, 314, 623 Heng, K., & Showman, A.P. 2015, Ann. Rev. Earth & Planet. Sci., 43, 509 Karkoschka, E. 1994, Icarus, 111, 174 Kawahara, H., & Fujii, Y. 2011, ApJ, 739, id. L62, 6 pp. Knutson, H.A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L.E., et al. 2007, Nature, 447, 183 Komacek, T. D., & Showman, A.P. 2016, ApJ, 821, id. 16, 22 pp. Kreidberg, L., & Loeb, A. 2016, ApJ, 832, L12 Kuhn, J.R., Potter, D., Parise, B. 2001,ApJ, 553, L189 Kuhn, J.R., & Berdyugina, S.V., 2015, Int. J. Astrobiology, 14, 401 Kuhn, J.R., Berdyugina, S.V., Langlois, M., Moretto, G., Thi´ebaut, E., Harlingten, C., Halliday, D. 2014, SPIE Proc., 9145, id. 91451G, 8 pp. McClatchey, R., Fenn, R., Selby, J., Volz, F., & Garing, J. 1972, A&A, Optical Properties of the Atmosphere, AFCRL-72.0497 (US Air Force Cambridge Research Labs) Moretto, G., Kuhn, J.R., Thi/'ebaut, E., Langlois, M., Berdyugina, S.V., Harlingten, C., Halliday, D. 2014, SPIE Proc., 9145, id. 91451L, 9 pp. Oppenheimer, B.R., Brenner, D., Hinkley, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1574 Patat, F. 2008, A&A, 481, 575 Sagan, C., & Khare, B. 1979, Nature, 277, 102 Schwartz, J. C., Sekowski, C., Haggard, H. M., Palle, E., Cowan, N. B., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 926 Simon, A.A., Wong, M.H., Orton, G.S. 2015, ApJ, 812, id. 55, 8 pp. Snellen, I.A.G., de Mooij, E.J.W., Albrecht, S. 2009, Nature, 459, 543 Langlois, M., Vigan, A., Dohlen, K., et al. 2014, SPIE Proc., Sobolev, V.V. 1956, Radiative Transfer in Stellar and Planetary 9147, id. 91479P, 8 pp. Langlois, M. 2017, private communication Atmospheres, Moscow
1811.02588	2	1811	2019-01-13T10:58:37	Contribution of the core to the thermal evolution of sub-Neptunes	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Sub-Neptune planets are a very common type of planets. They are inferred to harbour a primordial (H/He) envelope, on top of a (rocky) core, which dominates the mass. Here, we investigate the long-term consequences of the core properties on the planet mass-radius relation. We consider the role of various core energy sources resulting from core formation, its differentiation, its solidification (latent heat), core contraction and radioactive decay. We divide the evolution of the rocky core into three phases: the formation phase, which sets the initial conditions, the magma ocean phase, characterized by rapid heat transport, and the solid state phase, where cooling is inefficient. We find that for typical sub-Neptune planets of ~2-10 Earth masses and envelope mass fractions of 0.5-10% the magma ocean phase lasts several Gyrs, much longer than for terrestrial planets. The magma ocean phase effectively erases any signs of the initial core thermodynamic state. After solidification, the reduced heat flux from the rocky core causes a significant drop in the rocky core surface temperature, but its effect on the planet radius is limited. In the long run, radioactive heating is the most significant core energy source in our model. Overall, the long term radius uncertainty by core thermal effects is up to 15%.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Contribution of the core to the thermal evolution of sub-Neptunes A. Vazan1, C. W. Ormel1, L. Noack2, C. Dominik1 1Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geological Sciences, FU Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT Sub-Neptune planets are a very common type of planets. They are inferred to harbour a primordial (H/He) envelope, on top of a (rocky) core, which dominates the mass. Here, we investigate the long-term consequences of the core proper- ties on the planet mass-radius relation. We consider the role of various core energy sources resulting from core formation, its differentiation, its solidification (latent heat), core contraction and radioactive decay. We divide the evolution of the rocky core into three phases: the formation phase, which sets the initial conditions, the magma ocean phase, characterized by rapid heat transport, and the solid state phase, where cooling is inefficient. We find that for typical sub- Neptune planets of ∼2-10 M⊕ and envelope mass fractions of 0.5-10% the magma ocean phase lasts several Gyrs, much longer than for terrestrial planets. The magma ocean phase effectively erases any signs of the initial core thermodynamic state. After solidification, the reduced heat flux from the rocky core causes a sig- nificant drop in the rocky core surface temperature, but its effect on the planet radius is limited. In the long run, radioactive heating is the most significant core energy source in our model. Overall, the long term radius uncertainty by core thermal effects is up to 15%. Subject headings: Methods: numerical, Planetary systems, Planets and satellites: composition, Planets and satellites: interiors, Planets and satellites: physical evolution 9 1 0 2 n a J 3 1 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 2 v 8 8 5 2 0 . 1 1 8 1 : v i X r a 1. Introduction Exoplanets in the range of several Earth masses are very common in our galaxy (Howard et al. 2012; Batalha et al. 2013; Coughlin et al. 2016). Observed mass-radius relation for some of 1email: [email protected] -- 2 -- these planets suggest that some of these planets are bare rocky planets with no envelope, and some are inferred to contain some amount of hydrogen and helium (sub-Neptunes) on top of rock/iron core (hereafter core). The inferred envelope masses for sub-Neptunes are typically of several percent (Lopez et al. 2012; Jontof-Hutter et al. 2016; Wolfgang & Lopez 2015), i.e., most of the planet mass is in the core. In such a planet the core can perform as an energy reservoir for the envelope. In contrast to envelope (gases) cooling and contraction, the core radius is not expected to change much during the planetary evolution (Rogers & Seager 2010). However, the heat flux from the core can affect the thermal properties of the low-mass envelope by heating it from below. High enough heat flux from the core can lead to envelope mass loss (Ginzburg et al. 2016, 2017), but even a moderate flux from the core can change the envelope thermal prop- erties. Hence, the thermal evolution of the core indirectly affect the planet radius. Previous astrophysical studies have accounted for some of the core properties, like the decay of radioactive materials, when modeling the thermal evolution of the envelope (e.g., Lopez & Fortney 2014; Howe & Burrows 2015; Chen & Rogers 2016), assuming an isother- mal core that cools in the cooling rate of the envelope. However, in the mass range of Neptune-like planets, the core thermal properties can be significant (Baraffe et al. 2008). A key factor in the core-envelope thermal evolution is thus the timescale on which the core releases its heat; if the cooling is on Gyrs timescale, the observed radius is affected by it (Vazan et al. 2018). In order to study the timescale for the core cooling, its thermal evolution should be modeled explicitly. In geophysical studies core heat transport is explicitly modelled (Turcotte & Oxburgh 1967; Stevenson et al. 1983). The cooling rate is determined by the properties of high vis- cosity convection and the resulting conductive boundary layers between convective regions. In these models the surface temperature of the planet is fixed as there is no thick envelope. In contrast, in the case of sub-Neptune planets the surface temperature changes in time due to the envelope's cooling and contraction. The thick, gaseous envelope keeps the tempera- ture (and the pressure) at the core surface higher than in an Earth-like case, affecting the viscosity and the state of the core (solid/liquid). Thus, for sub-Neptunes the heat transport properties of the core depends on the envelope properties. Therefore, both envelope and core should be modeled simultaneously. In this work we model the thermal evolution of the planet as a whole, center to surface, and study the effects of the underlying thermal parameters on the state of the core, and on the derived planet radius. In section 2 we discuss our model, and define different phases of the core thermal evolution. In section 3 we show our results for sub-Neptune planets of ∼ 2 - 10 M⊕ with envelope mass fractions of 0.1% - 20%, and examine thermal properties -- 3 -- that lie within the uncertainty of geophysical models. We discuss the sub-Neptunes thermal evolution perspective in section 4, and draw our conclusions in section 5. 2. The model We calculate the thermal evolution of sub-Neptune planets with a rocky core and a hydrogen-helium envelope on a single structure grid (see Section 2.4). As illustrated in Fig. 1, we divide the evolution of the planet into three phases: 1. Formation -- the conditions of the core and the gaseous envelope as derived from esti- mates of core formation (see Section 2.1). 2. Magma ocean -- vigorous (liquid) core convection and efficient heat transport from the core to the gaseous envelope. 3. Solid state -- solidification of the core surface and conductive (reduced) heat transfer from the core to the envelope. The formation phase, in which the planet assembles in the presence of a gas-rich disk, is not explicitly modeled, but provides the initial conditions for the subsequent disk-free phases. The transition from phase 2 to phase 3 occurs when the core surface temperature drops below the solidification temperature for the surface pressure (see Section 2.2). This transition is approximated as instantaneous. The timing of the transition depends on the cooling of the core and the envelope, and on the core energy sources (see Section 2.3). After solidification (phase 3) core heat transport slows down significantly. We distinguish two end-member scenarios: (3a) conductive core; (3b) convective core with conductive surface boundary layer. In contrast to previous works, we determine the core thermal evolution from the per- spective of the core thermal properties, and not from the envelope evolution. The change in core properties in time is simulated by the three phases. The evolution path is continuous between the phases: at the end of each phase the structural parameters (radius, temperature, density, luminosity and composition for each mass layer) are being used for the first step of the next phase. -- 4 -- Fig. 1. -- The three phases of the core evolution: 1. Formation - the core is hot due to conversion of binding energy to heat; 2. Magma ocean phases - vigorous (liquid) core convection; 3. Solid state - we consider either an entirely conductive core (3a), or a convective core with conductive core surface (3b). 2.1. Initial conditions The initial energy content of the planet is determined by its formation. During the formation of a core the gravitational energy from the accumulation of the solid materials partially transforms to thermal energy. The speed of the accumulation process, as well as the material properties, determine which fraction of the gravitational binding energy is locked up in the planet in the form of thermal energy. A fast-forming core may retain large fraction of the initial binding energy and reach high initial temperatures. On the other hand, for a slow core formation a substantial amount of the binding energy is released already during the formation process (by radiation), which results in lower initial temperatures. The maximal temperature for the core formation can be estimated from the gravitational binding energy: Ebinding = 2 3GMc 5Rc (1) The maximal temperature is achieved when all the binding energy is converted to heat, i.e., Ebinding=CpMcTmax and thus Tmax ∼ GMc RcCp = 4.8 × 104 K (cid:18) Mc 1 M⊕(cid:19)(cid:18) Rc 1 R⊕(cid:19)−1(cid:18) Cp 1 kJ (kg K)−1(cid:19)−1 (2) where Mc and Rc are the core mass and radius, G is the gravitational constant, and Cp is rock heat capacity (Guillot et al. 1995). For a 4.5 M⊕ rocky planet of 1.65 R⊕ we get Tmax = 1.3 × 105 K. This is rather high, since it assumes no radiative or advective losses. But even when the initial temperature will be a fraction of Tmax, substantial amount of -- 5 -- heat is locked in the core, and the rocky part will radiate at a high luminosity. Since the fraction of gravitational binding energy that is left in the core after formation is unknown, we consider here a wide range of fractions between 5%-50% of Ebinding. The core is embedded in an initially diluted adiabatic envelope. We assume that the planet envelope is formed by gas accretion during the disk phase (Pollack et al. 1996; Ikoma & Hori 2012), and therefore is composed of hydrogen and helium at solar ratio. The envelope extends initially to the planet Hill radius2. 2.2. Flux from the core Heat transport by convection in the core is determined by the Rayleigh number Ra = ραg∆T D3 κη , (3) which depends on structure properties as gravity (g), density (ρ), layer thickness (D) and the temperature difference within the layer (∆T ), but also on material properties such as thermal expansion coefficient (α), thermal diffusivity (κ) and kinematic viscosity (η). Con- vection occurs for Rayleigh numbers greater than a critical value (here we use Racrit = 450, Morschhauser et al. (2011)). According to Eq. 3 convection is less likely and less vigorous if viscosity η and thermal conductivity κ are high. Between these two, the viscosity is the key factor in regulating the convection, since it is an exponential function of the local physical conditions. Specifically, we approximated the viscosity by (e.g., Karato & Wu 1993; Poirier 2000; Noack et al. 2016)3: η(T ) = η0 exp(cid:20) E0 Rg (cid:18) 1 T − 1 T0(cid:19)(cid:21) , (4) where reference values are extrapolated from Earth-like composition: viscosity η0 = 1021 Pa s, temperature T0 = 1600 K, and activation energy E0 = 240 kJ/mol; Rg is the gas constant. In the core-envelope-boundary (hereafter CEB) heat is transported by conduction. The thickness of the conductive layer δ is determined by the vigor of the underlying convection 2We calculated also for initial radius of 0.1 RHill, and find very minor effect on the long-term evolution for all cases. 3In high pressures as in the inner part of sub-Neptunes, viscosity also strongly depends on pressure (Stamenkovi´c et al. 2011; Tackley et al. 2013). Here we neglect the pressure term in the viscosity equation, because we focus on the conditions at the core-envelope-boundary, where the pressure is not more than several GPa for sub-Neptune mass range. This may slightly overestimate the cooling of the core. (Stevenson et al. 1983): -- 6 -- δ = D(cid:18)Racrit Ra (cid:19)1/3 (5) As the core cools and the viscosity increases, the Rayleigh number is lower and thus the conductive boundary layer becomes thicker. Since heat transport in the boundary layer op- erates by conduction -- a diffusive process -- core cooling depends on the conductive timescale, which is in the order of τcond = δ2/κ. Initially, the core is in a magma ocean phase -- a fluid phase of very low viscosity -- due to its high temperature from formation. In this phase the conductive boundary layer is very thin, and thus the conductive timescale is short (τcond 6 106 yr). In this phase we assume efficient heat transport from the core to the envelope, and in the core, i.e., we simply ignore the conductive CEB and model the core as adiabatic. The magma ocean phase continues until at some point the core is cold enough to allow solidification of the core surface. To find this point we compare the CEB temperature with the critical melting temperature for Earth mantle composition, as described in Appendix A1. The magma ocean solidifies from the bottom upward, since the melting temperature of rock increases more strongly with pressure than the increase in temperature of the adiabatic core structure. Therefore, CEB solidification implies that the core can no longer be modeled by low viscosity convection. After solidification, the high viscosity of the rock slows down the heat transport in the core. The change in the core heat transport after solidification is a gradual process, which depends on uncertain structure and material properties4. For simplicity, we consider here two extreme limits: (3a) conductive core, where we assume that convection will be suppressed due to the high interior pressure (e.g., van den Berg et al. 2010; Stamenkovi´c et al. 2012). (3b) convecting core, with conductive thermal CEB layer (including the crust) on top of it. We model the transition between the magma ocean phase (phase 2) and the solid state phase (phase 3) as instantaneous. In the case of an entirely conductive core we take the heat transport in all core layers to be conductive. We set the actual temperature gradient (Eq. 8-9 in Section 2.4 below) to conductive heat transport, using Earth mantle conductivity (Table 2). In the case of conductive CEB layer we assume a conductive CEB layer on top of a convecting core. The thickness of the conductive layer is calculated according to Eq. 5 at the CEB solidification 4Solidification also depends on the rock exact composition; very different composition can lead to different solidification temperatures and thus earlier/later solid state. -- 7 -- Sources Energy Release timescale [J/kg] [yr] Formationa Differentiation Radioactive decayb Solidification Contractionc 3.4 × 107 3.1 × 106 2.6 × 106 6.0 × 105 5.5 × 104 0 0 − 107 109 at tsolid self-consistent Table 1: Core energy sources Note. -- Values are for a 5 M⊕ planet with 10% envelope. a Core accretion energy, value for Eacc=0.2 Ebinding. b Earth-like abundance. c Automatically incorporated in model. Energy contribution is estimated. point. We take the heat transport only in that layer to be conductive, while the rest of the core remains convective. 2.3. Core energy sources Our model includes several energy sources. The magnitude of the involved energies and the timescale on which they operate affect the state of the core and the envelope. Below are the sources included in our model: I Formation As discussed in Section 2.1, the exact fraction of the accretion energy to be locked in the core depends on formation and thus unknown. Therefore, we calculate evolutionary tracks for planets with different fractions of the binding energy from core formation, in the range of 0.05-0.5 Ebinding. The lower bound of this range is calculated from the minimal energy of early Earth-like geophysical models (Noack et al. 2017), and the upper bound is an overestimation, assuming half of the impact energy is left in the core. We calculate models for values of 0.05, 0.1 0.2 0.3, 0.5 Ebinding. II Differentiation The core is initially of low viscosity (molten). Under this condition iron sinks to the center of the planet very efficiently (Stevenson 1990), i.e., during the early evolution. The released gravitational energy further heats the interior. We use the -- 8 -- formalism of Solomon (1979) to add the differentiation energy to the core. We assume the iron-to-rock ratio to be Earth-like, and find the differentiation energy to be of a few percent of the binding energy. For simplicity, we add this energy at once (i.e., at t = 0), to the initial energy content of the core5. III Radioactive heating The decay of radioactive elements is an important heat source in rocky planetary interiors (Valencia et al. 2007). The dominant elements with half lives in the Gyrs regime are 238U, 235U, 232Th and 40K (Nettelmann et al. 2011; Anders & Grevesse 1989). We apply the radiogenic luminosity to Eq. 6 (see below), by using the values of Nettelmann et al. (2011). The abundances of radioactive elements for exoplanets are unknown, but can range between 0.5 and 2.5 times the Earth ratio in solar analogue stars (Unterborn et al. 2015). Therefore, we calculate for planets in this abundance range. IV Solidification (latent heat) As the planet cools the core changes from liquid to solid. The solidification process releases latent heat. We include the latent heat release in our model by adding it to each planetary layer that cools below the solidification tem- perature. We use the melting curve as provided in Appendix A1. Rock latent heat of 6 × 105 J/kg (Morschhauser et al. 2011) is added to the luminosity (Eq. 6) of each solidified layer. V Core contraction The pressures in sub-Neptune interiors can reach GPa levels, where core compression may heat the core and affect the thermal evolution (Mordasini et al. 2012). In our calculation this effect is automatically included since the heavy element core is part of the evolution structure matrix, and pressure-temperature-density relation are derived from the rock EOS (Vazan et al. 2013). Estimate of the energy from core contraction (by p ∆V ) is found to be on the order of 104 − 105 J/kg for sub-Neptune mass range. Estimates of the above energy sources and their release timescales, for a 5 M⊕ planet with 10% envelope, appear in Table 1. The fits for the energy flux are implemented in the model by using the method described in Vazan et al. (2018). Collecting these effects, the luminosity in the core is taken to be: Lcore = Mc (cid:18)cv dTc dt + Eradio τr e(−t/τr) + Esolid ∆t δ (T − Tsolid)(cid:19) (6) 5Since the exact time of differentiation ranges between 106-107 yr (ref), we calculated also for later deposition of the differentiation energy, at t=107 yr, and find the long term (Gyrs) evolution to be the same. -- 9 -- where cv is the specific heat capacity, Mc the core mass, and t is time. dTc/dt describes the release of initial energy from formation and differentiation, Eradio and τr are adjusted to fit the heat production by radioactive decay as in Nettelmann et al. (2011), and Esolid is the solidification (latent) energy (Morschhauser et al. 2011) released on time interval ∆t, when the temperature reaches the solidification temperature (T=Tsolid). The parameter values appear in Table 2. External core energy sources, such as late planetesimal capture (Chatterjee & Chen 2018), are not included in the model. 2.4. Thermal evolution The evolution is modelled by a 1D hydrostatic planetary code that solves the struc- ture and evolution equations for the entire planet on one grid (see Kovetz et al. 2009; Vazan et al. 2013, 2015, for details). We use an equation of state (EOS) for hydrogen, helium (Saumon et al. 1995) and rock, as described in Vazan et al. (2013). The thermody- namic properties of the core (such as density, entropy, etc.) are modeled by the EOS of one material (SiO2), as a simplification for the full mineralogy of a core. The energy balance during the evolution is described by ∂u ∂t + p ∂ ∂t 1 ρ = q − ∂L ∂m (7) where the symbols ρ, p, u are density, pressure and specific energy, respectively, q is the con- tribution by the additional energy sources, and m, L are the planetary mass and luminosity. The temperature profile is determined by the heat transport rate according to ∂ ln T ∂m = ∇ ∂ ln p ∂m (8) In convective regions the actual temperature gradient ∇ is the adiabatic temperature gradient ∇A; otherwise, heat transfers via radiation (in the envelope) and conduction (in the core), i.e. ∇ = ∇R, where ∇R = . (9) κopL 4πcGm p 4pR κop is the harmonic mean of radiative and conductive opacities, and pR is the radiation pressure. 2.4.1. Atmospheric conditions The atmosphere opacity regulates the planet luminosity and the contraction of the en- -- 10 -- velope. We use Rosseland mean of the radiative opacity by Sharp & Burrows (2007) for solar metallicity grain-free atmosphere. Envelopes of sub-Neptunes may have an enhanced atmospheric metallicity from their formation (Fortney et al. 2013; Thorngren et al. 2016). Moreover, extended clouds in sub-Neptune atmospheres (e.g., Bean et al. 2011; D´esert et al. 2011) indicate large atmospheric metallicities and a large opacity (Morley et al. 2013). Be- cause of the important role of atmospheric opacity on the cooling rate of planets, we tested the sensitivity of our results to higher (30×solar) atmospheric metallicity. At the atmospheric boundary, which is taken to be the planetary photosphere, the outer boundary condition is κopp = τsg where g = GM/R2 is the gravitational acceleration, and τs is the optical depth of the photosphere. The envelope mass is constant during the evolution, i.e., no evaporation or gas accretion are included in the model. 2.4.2. Irradiation We assume the temperature distribution in a gray, plane-parallel atmosphere, with constant net outward flux F and irradiation temperature Tirr, to be σT 4(τ ) = (cid:18) 3 4 τ + 1 4(cid:19) F + g(τ )σT 4 irr. (10) 2(1 − 1 where g(τ ) = 3 2 e−τ ) (Kovetz et al. 1988) and σ is Stefan-Boltzmann's constant. The temperature distribution is calculated for a vertical (maximal) irradiation flux, with no angle dependency of the incident flux (Guillot 2010). At the photosphere, where τ = τS = 1 , the net outward luminosity of the planet is L = 4πR2F = 4πR2σ(cid:2)T 4 − g(τS)T 4 irr(cid:3) . The irradiation temperature as a function of the distance from the star is Tirr = (cid:18)L⋆(1 − A) 16πσd2 (cid:19)1/4 (11) (12) where L⋆ is the stellar luminosity (we use L⋆ = L⊙), d is the distance of the planet from the star, and A is the albedo. In order to separate the core effects from the environmental thermal effects, we first take d=1 AU as our standard model. This corresponds to the outer edge of Kepler's detection region. Next, we test closer-in cases of d=0.3 AU and examine the effect on the results. We avoid planets at d<0.3 AU, from which photoevaporation can become significant, since photoevaporation by the parent star removes (part of) the gaseous envelope (Owen & Wu 2013, 2016), and thus changes the envelope mass in time. -- 11 -- Parameter value unit ref Eradio (Eq. 6) τr (Eq. 6) Esolid (Eq. 6) 2.64×1010 1.85×109 6×109 L⊙ κop kcond d albedo 3.8515×1026 Z⊙ - 30×Z⊙ 4 0.3 - 1 0 erg/g yr erg/g 1 1 2 W 3 cm2/g 4 W/m/K 5 AU Table 2: Model parameters Note. -- Set of parameters we use in the model. References: 1Nettelmann et al. (2011), 2Morschhauser et al. (2011), 3Guenther et al. (1992), 4Sharp & Burrows (2007), 5Stevenson et al. (1983). The albedo strongly depends on the atmospheric composition and is an unknown pa- rameter for sub-Neptunes. Here we take all the irradiation to be absorbed by the planet (A = 0), which is the upper bound of the irradiation effect. Thus, a non-zero albedo planet should be located closer-in for an equivalent irradiation flux. 3. Results 3.1. Magma ocean phase 3.1.1. Role of core energy sources In Fig. 2 we show the evolution of 5 M⊕ planets with 90% (4.5 M⊕ ) core surrounded by 10% (0.5 M⊕ ) of hydrogen-helium envelope, located at 1 AU from a Sun-like star. The radius (left) and core surface (CEB) temperature (right) are shown in the figure, where the different curves are for different approximations for core energy sources. The CEB solidification occurs when the CEB temperature crosses the dashed horizontal melting line. At this time point (which we call tMO) the magma ocean phase ends. At first, all cases in the figure are modeled as in the magma ocean phase, i.e., efficient convection, even for t > tMO. Thus, the cooling after the solidification point (thin curves) is overestimated. In Section 3.2 below we show -- 12 -- the effect of the solidification on the results. The lowest core energy case (blue curve) is achieved for the lower bound of 0.5 Earth radioactive abundance and minimal initial energy from formation (Eacc=0.05Ebinding). Then, we increase the initial energy content of the core to 20% of the binding energy (Eacc=0.2Ebinding) and include the differentiation energy (red-dotted curve). As is shown in the figure, the long term evolution is the same as the previous case, since this energy is being released efficiently during the magma ocean phase on a timescale of ∼ 107yr. Although the initial core energy content doesn't affect the long term evolution, this initial energy can expand the envelope until it isn't bound to the planet. We test this idea (see appendix A2), and find that for an initial energy of more than 30% of the binding energy, part of the envelope is being lost, for the planets in Fig 2. Next, we increase the contribution from radioactive element decay to levels similar to Earth (dashed-yellow). Since the radioactive energy is being released on Gyr timescale, the long term radius and CEB temperature are higher for this case. In the next case (purple) we added the latent heat by core solidification. The latent heat release by core solidification occurs from inside-out. This is a gradual process during the magma ocean phase, which ends when the CEB solidifies. The latent heat release delays somewhat the CEB solidification by up to 1 Gyr, and slightly increases the radius. This case (purple curve) of a core with Earth abundance of radioactive content, and a latent heat release at solidification is our standard model. Finally, we considered a model with radioactive levels enhanced by a factor 2.5 over Earth. This high radioactive level is motivated by the maximal measured abundance around sun-like stars (Unterborn et al. 2015). This enhanced radioactive heating (dashed-green) in the core is found to be the most important energy contribution to the long term evolution. Variation in the fraction of radioactive elements in the observed range of 0.5-2.5× Earth abundance, results in up to 5% radius change for planets with solar-metallicity envelope. In general, fraction of radioactive elements and solidification (latent) heat are the most significant core energy sources for the long term. In addition to inflating the radius, the excess heat delays the CEB solidification time (from 4 Gyr to 8 Gyr in this case), and thus prolongs the magma ocean phase. For these cases, many observed sub-Neptunes are likely to be in a magma ocean phase. -- 13 -- 3.1.2. Dependence on the envelope mass In Fig. 3 we follow the change in surface (CEB) temperature during planet evolution, of planets with same core mass surrounded by envelopes of different masses. We use the 4.5 M⊕ standard core model (purple curve in Fig. 2), and vary the mass of the envelope between 0.1%-20% (0.005-1 M⊕ ). The horizontal curves in the figure show the point when the CEB solidifies, for the surface pressure and temperature of this planet, as described in appendix A1. In these runs, as before, magma ocean phase conditions are assumed for the entire evolution, thus the cooling after solidification (thin curves) is overestimated. As is shown in the figure, the magma ocean phase (thick part of each curve) for planets with significant envelopes lasts much longer than in the case of Earth. As the atmospheric mass increases, the temperature on the surface of the core is higher and, as a result, the surface stays molten for longer time. Therefore, for most of the cases in Fig. 3 the duration of the magma ocean phase increases with envelope mass. However, with increasing envelope mass, the pressure on the planet surface also increases and so does the melting temperature. For a thick envelope of about 1 M⊕ (red curve) the melting temperature is above 3000 K and therefore the CEB solidifies earlier than for lower mass envelopes. As a result, the magma ocean duration is limited to up to several Gyrs, since for high mass envelopes (>0.5 M⊕ ) the required higher melting temperatures shorten the magma ocean phase. We find that sub-Neptune planets with envelope masses between 0.01 M⊕ < Menv <1 M⊕ make the transition from magma ocean to solidified state during the time we observe them (1-7 Gyr). In the next section we estimate the effect of such a transition on the properties of the planet. 3.2. Solid state phase In Fig. 4 we present the planetary radius (left) and the CEB temperature (right) for a 4.5 M⊕ core with 0.5 M⊕ (10%) and 0.05 M⊕ (1%) envelopes. The solid curves represent the efficient core cooling as in the magma ocean phase (same as the blue and green curves in Fig. 3). After the CEB solidifies (dashed horizontal temperature line) we calculate for the two scenarios described in Section 2.2: thermal evolution with entirely conductive core (dashed-dotted), and thermal evolution with conductive CEB layer (dashed). The thickness of the conductive layer, according to Eq. 5, is about 100 km, and the timescale for cooling by conduction through this layer is on the order of 108 yr. As is shown in the figure, the CEB temperature rapidly changes at the point where the model (suddenly) assumes a conductive structure. The conductive CEB scenario moderates -- 14 -- the flux from the core but keeps the long term surface temperature similar to the magma ocean case. The conductive boundary layer acts as a bottle-neck for the cooling, but it is not thick enough to slow the cooling substantially. In the conductive core scenario the cooling is much slower; heat is locked in the core while the surface temperature drops. The effect of solidification on the thermal evolution depends on the envelope mass. In the case of the 0.5 M⊕ envelope (upper panels) the CEB solidification occurs at a later time than in the 0.05 M⊕ envelope case. At a later time the core energy budget is smaller (mainly due to radioactive decay). In addition, the cooling at the bottom of the thicker envelope (the core interface) is slower. Therefore, the drop in CEB temperature is more moderate. While the effect of the core properties is significant for some of the cases, the effect on the radius is more limited. The maximum radius change for sub-Neptune planets in our sample as resulting from solidification is about 6% percent, or 0.1 R⊕ . This maximum is achieved for a planet with 0.05 M⊕ envelope mass (bottom left in Fig. 4). For planets with lower mass envelopes, the contribution of the envelope to the total radius is small. On the other hand, planets with high envelopes masses, such as the 0.5 M⊕ envelope case (upper left in Fig. 4), have lower core-to-envelope mass ratios and smaller energy contents at solidification, which limit the effect on the radius. 3.3. Envelope conditions and planet mass Since the overall thermal evolution of the core depends also on the thermal evolution of the envelope, the thermal properties of the envelope are expected to change the results. Therefore, we calculate for enhanced (30×solar) atmospheric opacity, and higher irradiation by the star (d=0.3 AU). In figure 5 we show the radius (left) and CEB temperature (right) in time for identical planets with different atmospheric conditions. The standard case (blue) is compared to a case with enhances opacity (dashed-dotted) and to a case with a stronger irradiation (dashed). Additional representative results appear in Table 3. As is shown in the figure, irradiation has a significant effect on the envelope radius6, within the range of previous works (Lopez & Fortney 2014; Howe & Burrows 2015). However, irradiation doesn't change the surface conditions for significant envelope masses (>0.01 M⊕ ). As the outer layers of the envelope expands by irradiation, the conditions at the bottom of the envelope remain similar to the standard case. Thus, the location of the planet (for d>0.3AU) has a small effect on the core evolution in the presence of a significant envelope (photo-evaporation is 6Irradiation extends the outer atmosphere. Since our evolution model is calculated for a fixed mass, we verify that the outermost layer is at p>10 millibar, to avoid "fake" radii by extension of the outermost layers. -- 15 -- not included in the model). Atmospheric opacity, on the other hand, changes both the radius and the core surface temperature substantially. In the enhanced opacity case the envelope cooling is slower. Thus, the envelope traps the heat from the core and delays the core cooling. As is shown in figure 5, metallicity of 30×solar keeps the core surface hotter (molten) for much longer time than in the standard case. In the case of lower mass envelope, like for example a 4.5 M⊕ core with 0.1% envelope, the enhanced atmospheric metallicity (30×solar) delays the surface solidification from less than 0.5 Gyr to more than 2 Gyr. Moreover, the effect of core thermal properties on the radius become more important for the high atmospheric opacity. Uncertainty in radioactive elements, in the range of 0.5-2.5 Earth-ratio, results in up to 15% radius change for planets with enhanced envelope metallicity, in comparison to only 5% for similar planets with solar-metallicity. We also vary the mass of the core by a factor of two (2.25 M⊕ and 9 M⊕) for different envelope masses (examples in Table 3). We find that cores of different masses with the same envelope mass result in similar cooling rates of the core surface7, i.e., the envelope mass, and not the envelope fraction, is the key parameter driving the core thermal evolution. The reason is that during the magma ocean phase the pressure-temperature conditions at the bottom of the envelope are determined by the adiabatic structure of the envelope. Hence, the same envelope mass leads to similar pressure-temperature conditions at the core surface. In figure 6 we show this trend for two planets with different total masses, but the same envelope mass: the difference in magma ocean duration (CEB temperature) between a 10 M⊕ planet with 5% envelope and a 5 M⊕ planet with 10% envelope (same envelope mass) is smaller than the uncertainty within the core thermal properties for each planet. While the two cores feature a similar thermal evolution until solidification, the solidification point is somewhat different. The 10 M⊕ planet reaches the CEB solidification earlier than the 5 M⊕ planet, because of higher surface pressure which increases the melting (solidification) temperature. The radii of the 5 M⊕ planet is larger, because of irradiation effect on cores with lower gravity (e.g., Lopez & Fortney 2014). Conversely, the higher (lower) solidification temperature for more (less) massive cores, due to surface pressures, and the sensitivity to thermal effects by the higher (lower) gravity, are found to have only small effects on the radius variation by the core properties. Also here, high atmospheric opacity intensifies the core thermal effects. 7It should be noted that modification of the core heat transport by the change in mass (e.g., Stamenkovi´c et al. 2012) is not included in our simplified model. -- 16 -- 4. Discussion Our results indicate that many of the observed sub-Neptune planets are in the magma ocean phase for several Gyrs. This is very different than the short magma ocean phase of planets in our solar system (e.g., Elkins-Tanton 2012). Because of its prolonged existence, it is likely that core and envelope interact strongly; not only regarding their thermal properties (as modeled here) but also regarding their composition. For example, solubility of the envelope hydrogen in the silicate melt (Hirschmann et al. 2012) can be significant for high temperature and pressure conditions as in sub-Neptunes (Chachan & Stevenson 2018). Consequently, sub-Neptune planets with less than 1 M⊕ envelope may contain significant volatiles fraction in their cores, which affects the rock thermal and physical properties. Conversely, the long interaction of the molten convective core with the hydrogen enve- lope may also enrich the envelope with metals from the molten core. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge (experimental data as well as modelling) of rock-envelope interaction for sub-Neptune conditions. Most of the current knowledge pertains to processes on Earth-like terrestrial planets (e.g., Abe & Matsui 1986; Hirschmann 2012). Studies of rock-envelope interaction for sub-Neptune pressure-temperature conditions are necessary to improve our understanding of the structure and thermal properties of these objects. As we show in this work, the envelope mass determines the state and the cooling rate of the core. The Kepler's data reveals a statistical dip in planetary radius between two picks of 1.3 R⊕ and 2.6 R⊕ (Fulton et al. 2017). This valley, which divides the close-in planets into two populations, can be a result of envelope mass loss by photoevaporation (Owen & Wu 2017; Jin & Mordasini 2018). Envelope mass loss during the evolution shorten the magma ocean phase (as long as tevap < tMO) and thus affects the thermal evolution of the core. Thus, the valley actually divides the planets also into two thermal populations, where the radius pick of 1.3 R⊕ is for bare (solid state) cores, and the 2.6 R⊕ pick is for magma ocean phase cores (Menv >0.05 M⊕ ). Future studies of magma-envelope chemical interaction can provide atmospheric markers to be detected, in order to distinguish between the two populations. This study is focused on sub-Neptune planets around sun-like star (G-type). Sub- Neptune planets around M-type stars, which appear to be common (e.g., Mulders et al. 2015), may have different formation environment (e.g., Kennedy & Kenyon 2008; Ormel et al. 2017), and thus different core thermal contribution. For example, different core formation timescale in a lower mass disk will change the formation energy left in the core. Moreover, low mass disk may have different composition. As a result the differentiation energy, which is derived from the iron-to-rock ratio will change. The radioactive element abundances and the rock latent heat, which we find to contribute the most for the planet long term evolution, are derived from the rock mineralogy, which depends on metals abundances and thermal -- 17 -- conditions of the building blocks in the disk. As a result, the (Earth-like) values for core energy sources we used in this work (Secion 2.3) will change for M-type stars. This work consider rocky cores, without any fraction of ice. Ice-rich cores have sub- stantial effects on both radius-mass relation and the atmospheric properties (Chen & Rogers 2016). However, during the solidification of the molten core water would be expelled from the core (e.g., Elkins-Tanton 2008). For the planetary and envelope mass range of sub-Neptunes, water is found to stay in the envelope in vapor form; the surface pressure-temperature con- ditions don't allow for liquid water for the parameter range we studied here. As we show in figure 3, envelope mass larger than 0.02 M⊕ keeps the surface temperature above 1000 K for more than 10 Gyr. Thus, if the core contains some fraction of ice, the envelope is presum- ably saturated with vapor and thus denser than the H, He envelope in our model. In this case, the increase in core radius by the icy (lighter) materials diminishes by the decrease in envelope radius by the higher mean molecular weight. Moreover, ice-rich cores are expected to contain less radioactive elements, which are scaled with the rocky part. Therefore, the core energy source of radioactive heating is reduced. Close-in planets usually have low envelope masses, and thus exhibits limited radius change by core thermal contribution, as is discussed in Section 3.2. However, for close-in planets additional mechanisms, that are not included in our model, can affect the contri- bution of the core to the overall thermal evolution: (1) photoevaporation by the parent star. The early released core energy (formation and differentiation) extends the envelope radius and hence accelerates photoevaporation. Photoevaporation is expected to reduce the envelope mass, and therefore shorten the magma ocean phase duration. Including photoe- vaporation simulation (e.g., Murray-Clay et al. 2009) in the core-envelope evolution model is essential for modeling of close-in planets, and we would like to address it in a future work. (2) close-in planets experience tidal forces by the parent star. Tidal heating is a contin- uous energy source in the core, and may be significant for super-Earth cores8 (Efroimsky 2012). (3) late planeteseimal capture can add energy during the planet evolution, as well as increase the atmospheric metallicity. This contribution is relevant in particular for planets less massive than 10 M⊕ and with envelope mass fractions less than 10% (Chatterjee & Chen 2018). The core model appears in this work is a first order estimate for core thermal evolution. In detailed (envelope-less) geophysical models (e.g., van den Berg et al. 2019), the transfer between the different core thermal phases is continuous, and the heat transport depends on thermal and physical properties of the core minerals. As we show here the core-envelope 8corrected sentence -- 18 -- thermal effects are mutual, i.e., the envelope changes the core thermal state in time. Thus, in order to improve the existing sub-Neptune models one should link geophysical core model to envelope thermal evolution. Such a combined model is challenging, because of its self- dependent nature, but is necessary in order to better understand interiors of sub-Neptune planets. 5. Conclusion We have modeled the thermal evolution of sub-Neptune planets with core and hydrogen- helium envelope on one structure grid. Our model divides the evolution of the core into three phases: initial (formation phase), efficient cooling (magma ocean phase), and inefficient cooling (solid state phase). We have examined the contribution of the core energy sources to the thermal evolution of the planet as a whole. In particular, we followed the mutual core-envelope thermal effects on the core solidification and the planet radius evolution. We summarize our main conclusions below: 1. Most of the observed sub-Neptune planets are in the magma ocean phase (molten surface). We find that the duration of the magma ocean phase for planets with envelope masses between 0.01 M⊕ -- 1 M⊕ lies between 1 and 7 Gyrs. 2. Because of its efficient cooling, the magma ocean phase renders the evolution insensitive to the initial conditions. For this reason, the initial thermodynamic state of the core (heat of formation and iron differentiation) does not influence the radius evolution for more than several 107 years. 3. Radioactive decay is the most significant energy source to affect the planet radius, and the latent heat from solidification is the second. In the long term, the planet radius variation as a result of uncertainty in these core energy sources is at most 15%. 4. After solidification of the CEB the heat flux from the core decreases further. We cal- culate that the variation in radius due to uncertainties regarding the post-solidification phase is no larger than 6%. 5. Overall, for typical model parameters, the contribution from the thermal state of the core to the planet radius is rather limited (a few percent at most). Therefore, the inferred envelope mass from mass-radius relation is mostly proportional to the envelope (H/He) mass fraction. -- 19 -- 6. The atmospheric opacity significantly prolongs the magma ocean phase, and amplifies Irradiation (for d>0.3AU), on the other the core effects on the envelope evolution. hand, has only a minor effect on the core evolution. We thank Dave Stevenson, Wim van Westrenen, and Arie van den Berg for useful comments and discussions. A.V. thanks Attay Kovetz for helpful ideas for code modifications. A.V. acknowledges support by the Amsterdam Academic Alliance (AAA) Fellowship, and by the Netherlands Origins Center. C.W.O. is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO; VIDI project 639.042.422) A1. Rock melting curve For the calculation of rock melting curve we use solidus and liquidus pressure-temperature relation as followed: for pressures below 10 GPa we take melting curves for peridotite, based on de Smet et al. (1999), and consistent with melting profiles from Hirschmann (2000) (see also Noack et al. 2017): Tsolid = 1409.15 K + 134.2 p − 6.581 p2 + 0.1054 p3 Tliquid = 2035.15 K + 57.46 p − 3.487 p2 + 0.0769 p3 For pressures above 10 GPa we use melting curves for perovskite, based on Stamenkovi´c et al. (2011) for the solidus. We use a fixed difference between solidus and liquidus for lack of experimental data: Tsolid = 1835 K + 36.918 p − 0.065444 p2 + 0.000076686 p3 − 3.09272 × 10−8 p4 Tliquid = 1980 K + 36.918 p − 0.065444 p2 + 0.000076686 p3 − 3.09272 × 10−8 p4 We define our melting curve at 40% between the solidus and liquidus. We assume that up to 40% melt the rock behaves like a solid, and above that as a magma ocean. Thus, the critical melting temperature that we use as a transition between a rock behaving as a solid and a rock behaving as a liquid is: Tmelt = 1659.55 K + 103.504 p − 5.3434 p2 + 0.094 p3 for p < 10 GPa, and Tmelt = 1893 K + 36.918 p − 0.065444 p2 + 0.000076686 p3 − 3.09272 × 10−8 p4 for p > 10 GPa. In figure 7 we show the resulting rock melting temperature as a function of the CEB pressure for the range of sub-Neptune planets. -- 20 -- A2. Envelope mass loss As we show in Section 3, the initial core energy content doesn't affect the long term radius evolution. However, this energy can bloat the envelope until it isn't bound to the planet any more (Ginzburg et al. 2016, 2017). Here, we test this idea by adding high fractions of the formation core binding energy to the early phase core, and following the radius of the planet in comparison to its Hill radius. The expansion of the envelope is an outcome of the self-consistent core and envelope thermal evolution, accounting for the core heat flux and cooling, material properties (e.g., tabular EOSs and opacity) and their time dependency. We find that part of the envelope is being lost (Rp > RHill) when high fractions of formation energy is initially stored in the core. As the envelope expands from the core luminosity, the inner part of the envelope remains gravitationally bound to the core, and later on it cools more efficiently (than a thick envelope) and contracts. What fraction of the envelope is removed depends mainly on the initial core energy content, atmospheric opacity profile, and the distance from the star (Hill sphere). Under the conditions of our model, we find that envelope loss by the core energy starts when more than 30% of the accretion energy remains in the core after its formation. For core energy content of 40%, for example, our standard model of 4.5 M⊕ core cannot retain more than 0.1 M⊕ envelope. If less than 20% of the core binding energy is left in the core after its formation, all the planetary envelopes within the range of this work survive. REFERENCES Abe, Y. & Matsui, T. 1986, J. Geophys. Res., 91, E291 Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Barman, T. 2008, A&A, 482, 315 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., Dupree, A. K., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Gilliland, R. L., Isaacson, H., Latham, D. W., Marcy, G. W., Quinn, S. N., Ragozzine, D., Shporer, A., Borucki, W. J., Ciardi, D. R., Gautier, III, T. N., Haas, M. R., Jenkins, J. M., Koch, D. G., Lissauer, J. J., Rapin, W., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Buchhave, L. A., Carter, J. A., Charbon- neau, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Clarke, B. D., Cochran, W. D., Demory, B.-O., Desert, J.-M., Devore, E., Doyle, L. R., Esquerdo, G. A., Everett, M., Fressin, F., -- 21 -- Geary, J. C., Girouard, F. R., Gould, A., Hall, J. R., Holman, M. J., Howard, A. W., Howell, S. B., Ibrahim, K. A., Kinemuchi, K., Kjeldsen, H., Klaus, T. C., Li, J., Lucas, P. W., Meibom, S., Morris, R. L., Prsa, A., Quintana, E., Sanderfer, D. T., Sasselov, D., Seader, S. E., Smith, J. C., Steffen, J. H., Still, M., Stumpe, M. C., Tarter, J. C., Tenenbaum, P., Torres, G., Twicken, J. D., Uddin, K., Van Cleve, J., Walkowicz, L., & Welsh, W. F. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24 Bean, J. L., D´esert, J.-M., Kabath, P., Stalder, B., Seager, S., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Berta, Z. K., Homeier, D., Walsh, S., & Seifahrt, A. 2011, ApJ, 743, 92 Chachan, Y. & Stevenson, D. J. 2018, ApJ, 854, 21 Chatterjee, S. & Chen, H. 2018, ApJ, 852, 58 Chen, H. & Rogers, L. A. 2016, ApJ, 831, 180 Coughlin, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Rowe, J. F., Burke, C. J., Latham, D. W., Batalha, N. M., Ofir, A., Quarles, B. L., Henze, C. E., Wolfgang, A., Caldwell, D. A., Bryson, S. T., Shporer, A., Catanzarite, J., Akeson, R., Barclay, T., Borucki, W. J., Boyajian, T. S., Campbell, J. R., Christiansen, J. L., Girouard, F. R., Haas, M. R., Howell, S. B., Huber, D., Jenkins, J. M., Li, J., Patil-Sabale, A., Quintana, E. V., Ramirez, S., Seader, S., Smith, J. C., Tenenbaum, P., Twicken, J. D., & Zamudio, K. A. 2016, ApJS, 224, 12 de Smet, J. H., van den Berg, A. P., & Vlaar, N. J. 1999, Lithos, 48, 153 D´esert, J.-M., Bean, J., Miller-Ricci Kempton, E., Berta, Z. K., Charbonneau, D., Irwin, J., Fortney, J., Burke, C. J., & Nutzman, P. 2011, ApJ, 731, L40 Efroimsky, M. 2012, ApJ, 746, 150 Elkins-Tanton, L. T. 2008, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 271, 181 -- . 2012, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40, 113 Fortney, J. J., Mordasini, C., Nettelmann, N., Kempton, E. M.-R., Greene, T. P., & Zahnle, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 80 Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H., Marcy, G. W., Cargile, P. A., Hebb, L., Weiss, L. M., Johnson, J. A., Morton, T. D., Sinukoff, E., Crossfield, I. J. M., & Hirsch, L. A. 2017, AJ, 154, 109 Ginzburg, S., Schlichting, H. E., & Sari, R. 2016, ApJ, 825, 29 -- 22 -- -- . 2017, ArXiv e-prints Guenther, D. B., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 1992, ApJ, 387, 372 Guillot, T. 2010, A&A, 520, A27 Guillot, T., Chabrier, G., Gautier, D., & Morel, P. 1995, ApJ, 450, 463 Hirschmann, M. M. 2000, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1, 1042 -- . 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 341, 48 Hirschmann, M. M., Withers, A. C., Ardia, P., & Foley, N. T. 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 345, 38 Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, III, T. N., Van Cleve, J., Cochran, W. D., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Torres, G., Brown, T. M., Gilliland, R. L., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ciardi, D., Fressin, F., Haas, M. R., Howell, S. B., Kjeldsen, H., Seager, S., Rogers, L., Sasselov, D. D., Steffen, J. H., Basri, G. S., Charbonneau, D., Christiansen, J., Clarke, B., Dupree, A., Fabrycky, D. C., Fischer, D. A., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Tarter, J., Girouard, F. R., Holman, M. J., Johnson, J. A., Klaus, T. C., Machalek, P., Moorhead, A. V., More- head, R. C., Ragozzine, D., Tenenbaum, P., Twicken, J. D., Quinn, S. N., Isaacson, H., Shporer, A., Lucas, P. W., Walkowicz, L. M., Welsh, W. F., Boss, A., Devore, E., Gould, A., Smith, J. C., Morris, R. L., Prsa, A., Morton, T. D., Still, M., Thompson, S. E., Mullally, F., Endl, M., & MacQueen, P. J. 2012, ApJS, 201, 15 Howe, A. R. & Burrows, A. 2015, ApJ, 808, 150 Ikoma, M. & Hori, Y. 2012, ApJ, 753, 66 Jin, S. & Mordasini, C. 2018, ApJ, 853, 163 Jontof-Hutter, D., Ford, E. B., Rowe, J. F., Lissauer, J. J., Fabrycky, D. C., Van Laerhoven, C., Agol, E., Deck, K. M., Holczer, T., & Mazeh, T. 2016, ApJ, 820, 39 Karato, S.-I. & Wu, P. 1993, Science, 260, 771 Kennedy, G. M. & Kenyon, S. J. 2008, ApJ, 682, 1264 Kovetz, A., Prialnik, D., & Shara, M. M. 1988, ApJ, 325, 828 Kovetz, A., Yaron, O., & Prialnik, D. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1857 -- 23 -- Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. 2014, ApJ, 792, 1 Lopez, E. D., Fortney, J. J., & Miller, N. 2012, ApJ, 761, 59 Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., Dittkrist, K.-M., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2012, A&A, 547, A112 Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Kempton, E. M.-R., Marley, M. S., Visscher, C., & Zahnle, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 33 Morschhauser, A., Grott, M., & Breuer, D. 2011, Icarus, 212, 541 Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. 2015, ApJ, 814, 130 Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 23 Nettelmann, N., Fortney, J. J., Kramm, U., & Redmer, R. 2011, ApJ, 733, 2 Noack, L., Honing, D., Rivoldini, A., Heistracher, C., Zimov, N., Journaux, B., Lammer, H., Van Hoolst, T., & Bredehoft, J. H. 2016, Icarus, 277, 215 Noack, L., Rivoldini, A., & Van Hoolst, T. 2017, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 269, 40 Ormel, C. W., Liu, B., & Schoonenberg, D. 2017, A&A, 604, A1 Owen, J. E. & Wu, Y. 2013, ApJ, 775, 105 -- . 2016, ApJ, 817, 107 -- . 2017, ApJ, 847, 29 Poirier, J.-P. 2000, Introduction to the Physics of the Earth's Interior, 326 Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62 Rogers, L. A. & Seager, S. 2010, ApJ, 712, 974 Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713 Sharp, C. M. & Burrows, A. 2007, ApJS, 168, 140 Solomon, S. C. 1979, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 19, 168 Stamenkovi´c, V., Breuer, D., & Spohn, T. 2011, Icarus, 216, 572 -- 24 -- Stamenkovi´c, V., Noack, L., Breuer, D., & Spohn, T. 2012, ApJ, 748, 41 Stevenson, D. J. Fluid dynamics of core formation., ed. H. E. Newsom & J. H. Jones, 231 -- 249 Stevenson, D. J., Spohn, T., & Schubert, G. 1983, Icarus, 54, 466 Tackley, P. J., Ammann, M., Brodholt, J. P., Dobson, D. P., & Valencia, D. 2013, Icarus, 225, 50 Thorngren, D. P., Fortney, J. J., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Lopez, E. D. 2016, ApJ, 831, 64 Turcotte, D. L. & Oxburgh, E. R. 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 28, 29 Unterborn, C. T., Johnson, J. A., & Panero, W. R. 2015, ApJ, 806, 139 Valencia, D., O'Connell, R. J., & Sasselov, D. D. 2007, ApJ, 670, L45 van den Berg, A. P., Yuen, D. A., Beebe, G. L., & Christiansen, M. D. 2010, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 178, 136 van den Berg, A. P., Yuen, D. A., Umemoto, K., Jacobs, M. H. G., & Wentzcovitch, R. M. 2019, Icarus, 317, 412 Vazan, A., Helled, R., Kovetz, A., & Podolak, M. 2015, ApJ, 803, 32 Vazan, A., Kovetz, A., Podolak, M., & Helled, R. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 3283 Vazan, A., Ormel, C. W., & Dominik, C. 2018, A&A, 610, L1 Wolfgang, A. & Lopez, E. 2015, ApJ, 806, 183 This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 25 -- min E radio & E acc + 4 E acc std E radio + E latent + max E radio 2 4 6 8 10 12 ) R ( R 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 ) K ( B E C T 3000 2500 2000 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) Fig. 2. -- Radius (left) and CEB temperature (right) of 4.5 M⊕ cores with 0.5 M⊕ (10%) hydrogen-helium envelope. The different curves are for different assumptions for core energy sources: minimal radioactive heating and low formation energy (Eacc=0.05Ebinding) (blue), 4 times higher accretion energy (Eacc=0.2Ebinding) and including differentiation energy (red- dashed), Earth ratio of radioactive heating (yellow-dashed), including latent heat (blue), and maximal radioactive heating together with all previous energy sources (green-dashed). The horizontal line indicates the core surface solidification. -- 26 -- 20% 10% 5% 1% 0.5% 0.1% 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) ) K ( B E C T 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Fig. 3. -- CEB temperature of 4.5 M⊕ cores with different envelope masses. The percent- ages denote the mass fractions of the envelope with respect to the total planet mass. The horizontal lines indicate the (pressure-dependent) CEB solidification temperature of each planet (see appendix A1). The evolution is modelled by efficient magma ocean cooling, which overestimates the cooling after solidification (thin curves). -- 27 -- 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 magma ocean conduct. CEB conduct. core ) K ( B E C T 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) magma ocean conduct. CEB conduct. core ) K ( B E C T 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) / R R R R / 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3 2.35 2.3 2.25 2.2 2.15 2.1 2.05 2 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) 2 4 6 8 10 12 time (Gyr) Fig. 4. -- Radius (left) and CEB temperature (right) for a 4.5 M⊕ core with an envelope. Top panels: 10% envelope mass (0.5 M⊕ ); bottom panels: 0.1% envelope mass (0.005 M⊕ ). The solid curve is for efficient core cooling (magma ocean). The evolution with a conductive CEB layer (dashed) and with a conductive core (dashed-dotted) are shown after the CEB reaches the solidification temperature (horizontal dashed). -- 28 -- ) R ( R 5 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 ) K ( B E C T 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 Z solar , 1 AU 30 Z solar , 1 AU Z solar , 0.3 AU 2 6 4 8 time (Gyr) 10 12 2 6 4 8 time (Gyr) 10 12 Fig. 5. -- Radius (left) and CEB temperature (right) for 5 M⊕ planets with 0.5 M⊕ (10%) envelope. The different curve styles are for different envelope conditions: standard case of solar metallicity opacity located at 1 AU (solid blue), planet with enhanced atmospheric opacity of 30×solar (dashed-dotted black), and planet with higher irradiation as located at 0.3 AU (dashed red). The different curves of each color represent the different core cooling scenarios after core solidification (phase 3). -- 29 -- ) R ( R 4.2 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 2.8 ) K ( B E C T 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 10 Me, 5% HHe 5 Me, 10% HHe 2 6 8 4 time (Gyr) 10 12 2 6 8 4 time (Gyr) 10 12 6. -- Radius (left) and CEB temperature (right) for 10 M⊕ (dashed black) and Fig. 5 M⊕ (solid blue) planets with the same envelope mass of 0.5 M⊕ . The different curves of each planet represent the different core cooling scenarios after solidification (phase 3). The cores feature a similar thermal evolution until solidification. -- 30 -- Model Mcore Menv tMO (Gyr) radius [ R⊕ ] 1 Gyr 5 Gyr 10 Gyr 4.5 M⊕ 0.5 M⊕ std 6.8+1.5 −2.3 κop (30×Z⊙) >13 d (0.3 AU) 4.5 M⊕ 0.05 M⊕ std 6.9+2 −2.2 4.6+1.4 −2.4 κop (30×Z⊙) >13 d (0.3 AU) 4.6+1.2 −1.9 3.45+0.11 −0.07 4.00+0.21 −0.12 3.86+0.18 −0.1 2.26+0.05 −0.03 2.45+0.07 −0.03 2.44+0.09 −0.01 4.5 M⊕ 0.005 M⊕ std κop (30×Z⊙) d (0.3 AU) 0.2+0.4 −0.05 1.92+0.02 −0.07 2.4+1.8 −1.1 0.4+1.2 −0.1 2.04+0.05 −0.04 2.04+0.03 −0.03 2.25 M⊕ 0.05 M⊕ std 3.5+1.7 −1.9 2.39+0.06 −0.07 κop (30×Z⊙) 11.4+1.6 −1.4 2.89+0.2 −0.2 d (0.3 AU) 2.25 M⊕ 0.005 M⊕ std κop (30×Z⊙) d (0.3 AU) 3.2+2.1 −1.4 0.2+0.6 −0.2 3.5+1.3 −1.7 0.8+0.8 −0.3 2.86+0.14 −0.13 1.82+0.03 −0.06 2.05+0.07 −0.11 2.06+0.04 −0.8 9 M⊕ 1 M⊕ std 0.1+0.01 −0.03 3.58+0.07 −0.03 κop (30×Z⊙) 3.7+1.9 −1.6 3.96+0.1 −0.04 3.28+0.06 −0.08 3.71+0.06 −0.12 3.60+0.08 −0.09 2.19+0.03 −0.08 2.36+0.07 −0.03 2.33+0.07 −0.02 1.88+0.02 −0.05 1.96+0.03 −0.03 1.98+0.02 −0.02 2.20+0.06 −0.07 2.53+0.13 −0.06 2.54+0.13 −0.07 1.72+0.03 −0.04 1.87+0.04 −0.04 1.92+0.04 −0.02 3.44+0.06 −0.03 3.71+0.06 −0.04 d (0.3 AU) 0.1+0.03 −0.01 3.78+0.11 −0.05 3.6+0.06 −0.03 9 M⊕ 0.5 M⊕ std 5.3+1.4 −2.4 κop (30×Z⊙) >13 d (0.3 AU) 5.7+1.4 −2.2 3.11+0.05 −0.04 3.38+0.09 −0.06 3.27+0.07 −0.07 3.02+0.02 −0.05 3.22+0.05 −0.05 3.13+0.04 −0.05 3.14+0.03 −0.05 3.50+0.04 −0.04 3.44+0.04 −0.05 2.10+0.02 −0.06 2.27+0.06 −0.0 2.24+0.04 −0.01 1.85+0.01 −0.03 1.93+0.01 −0.02 1.96+0.01 −0.02 2.07+0.03 −0.04 2.41+0.04 −0.04 2.39+0.04 −0.03 1.68+0.01 −0.03 1.82+0.01 −0.03 1.88+0.01 −0.02 3.36+0.02 −0.02 3.6+0.04 −0.02 3.52+0.02 −0.03 2.93+0.02 −0.03 3.12+0.03 −0.02 3.06+0.01 −0.03 Table 3: Parameter study Note. -- Planet radii and the duration of the magma ocean phase (tMO) for various planets. Results are given for the standard (std) core model (blue curve in Fig. 2-4), the high atmosphere opacity model (κop), and the close-in model (d=0.3 AU). Error bars indicate the variation of tMO and radius resulting from the variation in core properties (as in Fig. 2). For t > tMO radius error bars include the solid state phase. -- 31 -- liquidus solidus our melting 0 10 30 20 p (GPa) 40 50 ) K ( T 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Fig. 7. -- Rock melting curve we use in this work to determine the rocky core solidification. We define our melting curve (solid black) at 40% between the solidus (red-dashed) and liquidus (blue-dashed). See appendix A1 for details.
1108.3561	1	1108	2011-08-17T19:59:06	A Habitable Planet around HD 85512?	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.IM" ]	Aims: In this study we assess the habitability of HD85512b, a 3.6M_Earth planet orbiting a K5V star. The radial velocity data and orbital parameters for HD 85512 b have just been published, based on data from the dedicated HARPS-upgrade GTO program. Methods: This paper outlines a simple approach to evaluate habitability of rocky planets from radial velocity (RV) searches by using atmospheric models of rocky planets with H2O/CO2/N2 atmospheres, like Earth. We focus our analysis on HD 85512 b. To first order the limits of the Habitable Zone depend on the effective stellar flux distribution in wavelength and time, the planet's Bond albedo, and greenhouse gas effects in this approach. We also discuss the dependence of habitability on the measurement accuracies. Results: We provide a simple set of parameters which can be used for evaluating current and future planet candidates from RV searches for their potential habitability. We find that HD 85512 b could be potentially habitable if the planet exhibits more than 50% cloud coverage. HD 85512 b is, with Gl 581 d, the best candidate for exploring habitability to date, a planet on the edge of habitability.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	A Habitable Planet around HD 85512? L. Kaltenegger1,2, S. Udry3 and F. Pepe3 1MPIA, Koenigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 2Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., 02138 MA, Cambridge, USA, email: [email protected] Aims: In this study we assess the habitability of HD85512b, a 3.6MEarth planet 3Observatoire de Geneve, Universit´e de Geneve, 51 ch. des Maillettes, CH–1290 Sauverny, orbiting a K5V star. The radial velocity data and orbital parameters for HD Switzerland 85512 b have just been published, based on data from the dedicated HARPS-‐ abstract upgrade GTO program. Methods: This paper outlines a simple approach to evaluate habitability of rocky planets from radial velocity (RV) searches by using atmospheric models of rocky planets with H2O/CO2/N2 atmospheres, like Earth. We focus our analysis on HD habitability on the measurement accuracies. 85512 b. To first order the limits of the Habitable Zone depend on the effective Results: We provide a simple set of parameters which can be used for evaluating stellar flux distribution in wavelength and time, the planet’s Bond albedo, and greenhouse gas effects in this approach. We also discuss the dependence of current and future planet candidates from RV searches for their potential Key words: Astrobiology, Techniques: radial velocities, Earth, Planets and habitability. We find that HD 85512 b could be potentially habitable if the planet satellites: individual: HD 85512 b, atmospheres exhibits more than 50% cloud coverage. HD 85512 b is, with Gl 581d, the best candidate for exploring habitability to date, a planet on the edge of habitability. Introduction The planet is one of the least massive planets detected to date. It is the least The dedicated HARPS-Upgrade GTO massive program, recently published the radial- planet confirmed in the velocity data and the orbital parameters Habitable Zone (HZ) of its host star. HD of a new low-mass planet of 3.6 ±0.5 85512 b provides a promising target for paper. the study of habitability of exoplanets. Its MEarth minimum mass around the star HD mass is consistent with rocky planet 85512 (Pepe et al. 2011). HD 85512 is a K5V star with 0.126 ± 0.008 solar models, an assumption we adopt for this luminosity, 0.69 solar mass and an Different aspects of what determines effecitve temperature, Teff, of 4715 ± 102. the boundaries of the HZ have been HD 85512 b orbits its star in 58.43 ±0.13 discussed broadly in the literature (see days at 0.26 ± 0.005 AU with an section 2). The width and distance of the eccentricity of 0.11 ± 0.1, which places it HZ annulus - as well as the effective near the inner edge of the habitable zone temperature (HZ). Here we assume that the planet’s - for an Earth-like actual mass is close to its minimum mass. atmosphere depends to a first approximation on 4 main parameters: 1) The stellar and planetary parameters for the system are given in table 1. incident stellar flux which depends on stellar luminosity, spectral energy distribution and eccentricity of the system, 2) overall planetary Bond albedo, 3) greenhouse gas concentration, and 4) energy distribution in the planetary The atmospheric model we present atmosphere. We compare these values to here only represents one possible Earth, Venus as well as Gl 581c to assess nature of HD 85512 b – that of a rocky the habitability of HD 85512 b. like Earth -‐ in a wide parameter space (see results). This atmosphere model produces a dense water dominated planet with an H2O/CO2/N2 atmosphere, atmosphere on the inner edge of the HZ and a dense CO2 dominated atmosphere on the outer edge of the HZ. Between those limits, we assume that on a geological active planet, climate stability is provided by a feedback mechanism in which atmospheric CO2 concentrations vary inversely with planetary surface temperature. We introduce the concept of the Habitable Zone in section 2, explore the influence of first order effects and how they match the level of information and uncertainties for planetary candidates from radial velocity searches in section 3. In particular we focus on HD 85512 b. Section 4 states our conclusions. Our approach can be applied to current and future candidates provided by RV searches. The concept of the Habitable Zone The habitable zone concept was first developed by Huang (1959, 1960) and has been calculated by several groups (see e.g. Kaltenegger & Sasselov 2011 and references therein, as well as Abbe et al. 2011 for limits of the HZ for dry planets). The main differences among these studies are the climatic constraints imposed. For this paper we focus on the circumstellar HZ (Kasting et al. 1993, Selsis et al. 2007), defined as an annulus around a star where a planet with a CO2/H2O/N2 atmosphere and a sufficiently large water content like Earth can host liquid water permanently on a solid surface. Note that this definition of the HZ is adopted because it implies surface habitability and in turn allows remote detectability of life as we know it. Subsurface life that could exist on planets and moons with very different surface is not considered here, temperatures because of the lack of atmospheric features to remotely assert habitability (see e.g. Rosing 2005). In this definition, the two edges of the HZ as well as the equilibrium temperature of the planet, Teq, are depend on the Bond albedo of the planet A, the luminosity of the star Lstar, the planet’s semi major axis D, as well as the eccentricity e, of the orbit and in turn the average stellar irradiation at the planet’s location. A more eccentric orbit increases the irradiation averaged annually proportional to (1 − e2)−1/2 (see William & Pollard 2002). In our atmospheric models The inner edge of the HZ denotes the the greenhouse effect is a factor in the location where the entire water overall albedo calculations and is not reservoir can be vaporized by runaway called out explicitly in this paper. greenhouse conditions, followed by the photo-dissociation of water vapor and subsequent escape of free hydrogen into space. The outer boundary denotes the distance from the star where the maximum greenhouse effect fails to keep CO2 from condensing permanently, leading to runaway glaciation (Kasting et al. 1993). Note that at the limits of the HZ, the Bond albedo of a habitable planet is fully determined by its atmospheric composition and depends on the spectral distribution of the stellar irradiation (Fig. 1). For a planet with a dense atmosphere, like Earth, Teq has to be below 270 K and above 175 K to be habitable (discussed in detail in Kaltenegger & Sasselov 2011 and references therein). To simply estimate if a planet is potentially habitable (175K ≤ Teq ≤ 270K), one can use eq.(1) to approximate Teq for Earth-like planets around stars with Teff from 7200 K to 3200 K using the maximum albedo derived for different cloud coverage from Fig.1. Teq= ( (1−A) L star the fraction of the represents β planetary surface the that reradiates absorbed flux. β is 1 if the incident energy is uniformly reradiated by the entire surface of the planet, e.g. for a rapidly an planet with rotating atmosphere, like Earth (see results). / (4βD2(1-e2)1/2) ) 1/4 (1) Fig.1 Maximum planetary Bond albedo at the inner edge of the HZ derived for Earth-like atmosphere models for 0%, 50% and 100% clouds (from left to right). Fig.1 shows the maximum albedo derived from these models for an Earth- like atmosphere. The specific effects of clouds on the albedo depends on their height as well as particle size distribution (see e.g. Zsom et al. 2011, Goldblatt et al. 2011). The 100% cloud value (dashed lines) is used here to show the extreme effect of clouds on the HZ in accordance with work by Selsis (et al. 2007). We model rocky planets with H2O/CO2/N2 atmospheres, representative of geological active planets like Earth, to calculate the maximum Bond albedo as a function of irradiation and atmosphere composition and the edges of the HZ for HD 85512 b. These models represent rocky geological active planets and produce a dense CO2 atmosphere at the outer edge, an Earth-like atmosphere in the middle, and a dense H2O atmospheres at the inner edge of the HZ. Using eq. (1) and the maximum Bond albedo values from the atmosphere models, shown in Fig.1, provides the minimum Teq of the planet. Note that Teq does not correspond to any physical temperature at the surface or in the atmosphere. However it is very useful to assess habitability of a planet: if 175K ≤ Teq ≤ 270K, the planet could potentially be habitable (see e.g. Kaltenegger & Sasselov 2011). However a planet found in the HZ is not necessarily habitable, since many factors may prevent habitability like the lack of water or ingredients necessary for the emergence of life (see e.g. Zahnle et al. 2007, Selsis et al. 2007). From the case studies by Kasting (Kasting et al. 1993) the inner lin, and outer limit lout, of the solar HZ can be extrapolated to stars with luminosity L, and effective temperature Teff between 3700 K and 7200 K using eq.(2): 2) (L/Lsun)1/2 (2) lx= (lx_sun–axTstar-bxTstar with ain = 2.7619 10−5, bin = 3.8095 10−9, aout = 1.3786 10−4, bout = 1.4286 10−9, and TStar = Teff − 5700, lx (lin and lout) in AU, and Teff and Tstar in K. Depending on the fractional cloud cover, the theoretical “water loss” limit (Tsurf = 373K) of the HZ of our Solar System assuming 0%, 50% and 100% cloud coverage, give lin as 0.95, 0.76 and 0.51 AU and lout as 1.67, 1.95 and 2.4 AU, respectively (see e.g. Selsis et al 2007). The inner limit for the 50% cloud case corresponds to the “Venus water loss limit”, a limit that was empirically derived from Venus position in our Solar System (0.72 AU). Results Using the specifics of HD 85512 b we demonstrate the influence of the main parameters on its position in the HZ as well as the potential habitability of the planet. Fig. 2 relates the uncertainties in the measurements for RV planets, eccentricity, semi-major axis as well as stellar luminosity on its position in the HZ (right) and on the flux on top of the planetary atmosphere. S0 is the solar flux received at the top of Earth’s atmosphere at 1 AU, (S0=1360 Wm−2). The error on the y-axis shows the uncertainty in stellar luminosity and the error on the x-axis shows the uncertainty in the planet’s position (left) as well as its irradiation (right). The limits of the HZ are shown here for 0%, 50% and 100% cloud coverage for comparison. Note that the x- axis in Fig. 2 (right) is increasing toward the left because the irradiation of the planet increases with decreasing distance from its host star and is not plotted on a log scale to allow detailed comparison of flux levels. The two panels in Fig. 2 relate the distance of the planet and the limits of the HZ to the flux received at the planet’s position to compare it to Venus, Earth and Gl 581c. The derived the of uncertainty eccentricity of 0.11 ± 0.1 is small and therefore does not changes the flux received position planet’s the at significantly, only by +1.6% and -0.6%. The uncertainty of the planet’s semi major axis of 0.26 ± 0.005 AU change the incident flux on top of the planet’s atmosphere by +4 % and –3.7 %. The biggest factor in the measurement uncertainties luminosity of in stellar 0.126 ± 0.008 that changes the flux at the planet’s location by 6.3%. Fig. 2: Effect of the total measurement errors in semi-major axis and eccentricity and the resulting uncertainty (left) on the position in the HZ and (right) irradiation at the position of HD 58812 b in units of solar flux received at the top of Earth’s atmosphere at 1 AU, S0 =1360 Wm−2. The error on the y-axis shows the uncertainty in stellar luminosity and the error on the x-axis shows the uncertainty in the planet’s position (left) as well as its irradiation (right). The limits of the HZ are shown here for 0%, 50% and 100% cloud coverage as comparison. The minimum flux on top of the planet’s atmosphere is given for minimum stellar luminosity, minimum eccentricity, and maximum semi major axis. The maximum irradiation is given for maximum stellar luminosity, maximum eccentricity and minimum semi-major axis (shown in Fig. 2). These errors change the total incident radiation on the top of the planet’s atmosphere by about +12 % and -10.7 %. Even the maximum increase in luminosity from uncertainties in the RV measurements does not put HD 85512 b outside the HZ. well as planetary atmosphere model parameters, we calculate the planet’s minimum equilibrium temperature shown in Fig.4. Fig. 3 Stellar Luminosity in solar units, LSun, versus stellar flux on top of the planetary atmosphere, given in units of the flux received on the top of Earth’s atmosphere, S0. The extent of the inner edge of the HZ for the water loss limit for 0%, 50% and 100% (dashed line) cloud coverage (from right to left) and Earth, Venus and Gl 581c are added for comparison. Fig. 3 shows the stellar luminosity versus the stellar flux received on top of the planet’s atmosphere in S0. The error on the x-axis represents uncertainties in e and the semi-major axis, while the error on the y-axis represent the uncertainty in stellar luminosity. Earth, Venus as well as Gl 581c (Bonfield et al. 2005) are added for comparison. The limits of the HZ are also shown for 0%, 50% and 100% cloud coverage. Gl 581 c receives about 30% more flux than Venus, while HD 85512 b receives slightly less flux than Venus. The total measurement uncertainties of +12 % and -10.7 % on the planet’s irradiation change the overall flux received at HD 85512 b’s position from 88% to 110% of the flux received by Venus. Using the uncertainties on the stellar as Fig. 4: Minimum equilibrium temperature of HD 85512 b for 0%, 50% and 100% cloud coverage (left to right). The y axis corresponds to the total uncertainty of the stellar flux received at the planet’s location +12%, -10.7% in S_0, due to measurement uncertainties in stellar luminosity as well as eccentricity and semi-major axis for HD 85512 b. Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 show the influence of atmosphere model the planetary parameters on habitability. In our atmospheric models the greenhouse effect is a factor in the overall albedo calculations and is not called out explicitly. Fig. 4 shows the influence of the atmosphere’s maximum Bond albedo on Teq, the curves represent models of 0%, 50% to 100% cloud cover respectively. We find that HD 85512 b could be potentially habitable if the planet exhibits more than 50% cloud coverage, assuming β=1. There is no indication for a second planet in the system as of now and the eccentricity to be zero, is expected reducing the irradiation of the planet. A planetary albedo of 0.48 for a circular orbit and 0.52 +/- 0.05 for e = 0.11 +/- 0.1 is needed to keep the equilibrium temperature below 270 K and the planet potentially habitable. As comparison Venus has a Bond albedo of about 0.75, while Earth and Mars have a Bond albedo of about 0.3, and 0.2 respectively. If clouds were increasing the albedo of HD 85512 b (for details see Zsom et al. 2011), its surface could remain cool enough to allow for liquid water if the reradiation parameter β. As there is present. no indication for a second planet in the Due to the close orbit of the planet to its system for now, that could prevent the star, tidal locking can be explored using planet from being locked into synchronous rotation (see e.g. Leconte et al. 2010) or for high eccentricity, we explore the influence of the heat transfer by parameterizing β to mimick the effect of potential tidal locking on the planetary climate. β varies between 1 and 0.5, for a rapid rotating planet like the Earth to a planet that only reradiates the flux over half of its hemisphere respectively. Note that the atmosphere would have to be disconnected or non- existent for the extreme case of β = 0.5 . Fig.5: Effect of the heat transfer parameter β on the equilibrium temperature. The range of the stellar flux on the y-axis corresponds to the maximum and minimum irradiation received by the planet due to stellar and planetary parameter uncertainties for HD 85512 b. Fig. 5 explores the influence of the heat redistribution parameter on the equilibrium temperature and in turn on habitability of a planet. It shows Teq for HD 85512 b as a function of β factor for a Bond albedo of 0.52, what corresponds to the minimum albedo needed to keep Teq below 270K for e=0.11 and β=1. Parameterizing the heat transfer is only a rough approximation to show the resulting effect and detailed 3D models are needed to verify these results. The reradiation factor has a strong influence on the amount of deposited flux as well as the resulting Teq of the planet’s lit hemisphere. To keep Teq below 270K for β = 0.7, the planet would need a minimum Bond Albedo of 0.9. For lower values Teq > 270Κ. Note that the cloud fraction quoted in Fig. 1 needs to be maintained on the illuminated side of a synchronous rotating planet to achieve the Bond albedo. For atmospheres like Earth’s, it is unlikely that β is much lower than 1. Detailed models have shown that even for planets in synchronous rotation direct illumination of only one hemisphere does not prevent habitability for planets with even modestly dense atmospheres like Earth (Haberle et al. 1996, Joshi et al. 1997, Joshi 2003, Edson et al. 2011, Wordsworth et al. 2011), provided atmospheric cycles transport heat from the dayside to the nightside. The first planets below 10 Earth masses, with both mass estimates and radius measurements, have provided a wide range of observed radii and densities. Especially in the mass range below 5 Earth masses, two planets in the multiple planet system around Kepler 11 (see e.g. Borucki et al. 2011, Lissauer et al. 2011), Kepler 11 b and Kepler 11 f, with 4.3 and 2.3 Earth masses have radii of 1.97, 2.61 Earth radii and mean densities of 3.1, 0.7 g/cm3 respectively. These derived densities allow substantial envelopes of light gases for this mass range. If HD 85512 b’s density were low, like Kepler 11f, it would also be consistent with an extended H/He or H2O/H planet atmosphere. Recent atmosphere observations for a 6.55+/- 0.98 Earth mass planet, GJ 1214 b, with a mean density of 1.8 g/cm3 (Charbonneau et al 2010, Bean et al 2010, Desert et al. 2011), indicates either hazes or high cloud cover in an expanded atmosphere. We do not discuss observed planets with a mean density comparable to Earth, e.g. Corot 7b (Leger et al. 2010) and Kepler 10b (Bathala et al. 2011), here, because of their close distance to their host star and resulting temperature range that is much higher than for HD 85512 b. Such temperature differences would most likely atmospheric the influence composition. A larger sample will improve our understanding of this field and promises to explore a very interesting parameter space that indicates the potential co- existence of extended H/He and H2O dominated atmospheres as well as rocky planet atmospheres in the same mass and temperature range. Advanced formation models aim to explain the existence of such a wide range of densities in this temperature mass range and are making rapid progress in recent years (see e.g. Mordasini et al. 2011, Ida & Lin 2010). In this paper we only explore the potential habitability of HD 58812 b, assuming atmospheric models of rocky planets with H2O/CO2/N2 atmospheres, like Earth, leaving the interesting question open whether a planet with an extended H/He/H2O could also be potentially habitable. Discussion Recent investigations of high precision radial velocity data samples have shown that between 20% and 50% of all sample stars exhibit RV variations indicating the presence of super-Earths or ice giants (Lovis et al. 2009, Howard et al. 2010, Mayor et al. 2011). Among them are two other possibly rocky planets around Gl 581 with masses of 5 and 8 MEarth, respectively, lying at the edge of the HZ of their parent star (Udry et al. 2007, Mayor et al. 2009). We do not include the unfortunately unconfirmed planet Gl581g in our analysis (see also Forveille et al. 2011 and references therein). The habitability of the most interesting planet until now, Gl 581 d, was discussed al. 2011). Gl 581 d has a minimum mass in detail by several groups (Selsis et al. of 7 MEarth, a derived radius of 1.69 2007, Wordsworth et al. 2010, von Paris REarth and orbits its star in 66.8 days on et al. 2010, Hu et al. 2011, Kaltenegger et the outer edge of the HZ. Gl 581d requires several bar of CO2 to remain habitable at that distance and irradiation. The CO2 levels needed are consistent with a geologically active rocky planet model. Its minimum mass is about two times the minimum mass of HD 58812 b, increasing the probability of a substantial H/He envelope compared to HD 58812 b. As no radius is available for Gl 581d or HD 58812 b, the mean density of the planets can no be derived. To characterize the planet, a spectra of its atmosphere is needed, that could provide the distinction of a habitable world versus a Mini- Neptune (see e.g. DesMarais et al. 2002, Kaltenegger et al. 2010). A hypothetical clear atmosphere model spectra for Gl 581 d in emission and transmission (Kaltenegger et al. 2011) was calculated to assess whether habitability could be detected remotely. The high CO2 content in a habitable atmosphere model for Gl 581 d would reduces the signal of any observable biomarkers in its spectrum, but would in turn allow us to probe our concept of habitability and the corresponding CO2 levels on the outer edge of the HZ. Our atmosphere models for HD 58812 b only include the greenhouse effects of H2O, CO2 and N2. Any additional greenhouse gas that could be present on such hot planets could in additional increase the temperature of the planets’ surfaces. The effect of other greenhouse gasses on the inner edge of the HZ has not been explored yet and has therefore not been addressed here. As discussed in the original discovery paper (Pepe et al 2011 for detailed discussion) the stellar parameters in table 1 may be affected by systematic errors, given the late spectral type of the star. Therefore two effective temperatures of 4715±102K and 4419K are obtained for this star for mass values of 0.73 and 0.65 Msun respectively. Both values are compatible with the error bars. The results shown in this paper are derived from the stars overall luminosity and are to first order not dependent on the exact temperature of the star, even though the maximum Bond albedo slightly changes (see Fig.1). We assume that the planet’s mass is similar to its minimum mass here, what leads to a surface gravity of about 1.4g for HD 58812 b, scaling its gravity with the mass and volume of a rocky planet. A higher mass and resulting higher gravity is expected to shift the inner edge of the HZ towards the star due to the gravity’s influence on the water column and resulting IR opacity of the atmosphere, as well as on the lapse rate and Bond albedo. Atmosphere model calculations for a planet with surface gravity of 2.5g found that these effects roughly compensate and the inner edge of the HZ is only 3% closer to the host star (Kasting et al. 1993). For the expected gravity of HD 58812 b, this effect can be neglected. Conclusions This paper outlines a simple approach to evaluate habitability of rocky planetary candidates from radial velocity searches by assuming models for rocky planets with H2O/CO2/N2 atmospheres, like Earth. We focus our analysis on HD 85512 b. We the of influence the show measurement uncertainties on its location in the Habitable Zone as well as its potential habitability. We find that HD 85512 b could be potentially habitable if the planet exhibits more than 50% cloud coverage. A planetary albedo of 0.48 +/- 0.05 for a circular orbit, and an albedo of 0.52 for e=0.11 is needed to keep the equilibrium temperature below 270K and the planet potentially habitable. With its low mass and its incident irradiation slightly lower than Venus, HD 85512 b is, with Gl 581 d, the best candidate for habitability known to date. If clouds were increasing the albedo of HD 85512 b, its surface could remain cool enough to allow for liquid water if present. HD 85512 b is a planet on the edge of habitability. Acknowledgement We are grateful to Dimitar Sasselov and Hans-Walter Rix for helpful comments and discussion. L.K. acknowledges support from NAI and DFG funding ENP Ka 3142/1-1. References Abbe, Y. et al. 2011, Astrobiology. 2011 Jun;11(5):443-60 Batalha, Natalie M., et al, 2011, ApJ, 729, 1, article id. 27 Bonfils, X., Forveille, T., Delfosse, X., et al. 2005, A&A, 443, L15, Borucki, B. et al., 2011, ApJ, 728, 2, 117 Edson, A., Lee, S., Bannon, P., Kasting, J.F, Pollard, D., Icarus, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.11.023 Forget, F. & Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1997, Science, 278, 1273 Foveille, L., et al 2011, submitted Haberle, R.M., McKay, C., Tyler, D., & Reynolds, R. 1996, Can synchronous rotating planets support an atmosphere? In Circumstellar Habitable Zones, edited by L.R. Doyle, Travis House, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 29–41. Hu, Y., & Ding, F. 2011, A&A, 526, A135 Huang, S. S., Sci. Am. 202(4), 55 (1960). Huang, S.S. , Am. Sci. 47, 397 (1959). Ida, S.; Lin, D. N. C., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1, 810 Howard, A. W. et 2011arXiv1103.2541H Joshi, M. 2003, Astrobiology 3, 415–427. Joshi, M.M., Haberle, R.M., and Reynolds, R.T. 1997, Icarus 129, 450– 465. Kaltenegger L. & Sasselov, D., ApJL 736, 2, 2011 Kaltenegger L., Segura A., Mohanty, S, ApJ, 733, 1, 2011 Kaltenegger, L., Selsis, F. et al. 2010, Astrobiology 10, 1, 25 Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108 Kitzmann D., Patzer, A. B. C., von Paris, P., Godolt, M., Stracke, B., Gebauer, S., Grenfell, J. L. and Rauer, H. 2010, A&A 511, A66 Leconte, J., Chabrier, G.; Baraffe, I.; Levrard, B., 2010, A&A, 516, id.A64 Leger, A., et al. 2009, A&A, Volume 506, Issue 1, pp.287-302 2011, al. Lissauer, Jack J. et al, 2011, nature, 470, 7332, pp. 53 Mayor, M., Udry, S., Lovis, C., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Benz, W., Bertaux, J. -L., Bouchy, F., Mordasini, C., Segransan, D., 2009, A&A, Volume 493, Issue 2, pp.639-644 Mordasini, C.; Alibert, Y.; Benz, W.; Klahr, 2011, H., 2011arXiv1102.4146M Pepe, F. et al., A&A, 2011, in press Rowe, J. F., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1345 Rosing , M.T., International Journal of Astrobiology, vol. 4, Issue 1, p.9-11, 2005 Selsis, F., Kasting, J. F., Levrard, B., Paillet, J., Ribas, I., Delfosse, X., 2007, A&A, 476, 3, 1373 Udry, S., Bonfils, X., Delfosse, X., Forveille, T., Mayor, M., Perrier, C., Bouchy, F., Lovis, C., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., & Bertaux, J.-L. 2007, A&A, 469, L43 von Bloh, W., Bounama, C., Cuntz, M., & Franck, S. 2007, A&A, 476, 1365 von Paris, P. et al., Planetary and Space Science, Volume 56, Issue 9, p. 1244- 1259, 2008 Williams, D. M. and Pollard, D., Int. J. Astrobiology 1, 61 (2002) Wordsworth, R. D.; Forget, F.; Selsis, F.; Madeleine, J.-B.; Millour, E.; Eymet, V., 2010, A&A, 522, id.A22 Zahnle, K., Arndt, N., Cockell, C., Halliday, A., Nisbet, E., Selsis, F., & Sleep, N. H. 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 129, 35 Zsom, A., Kaltenegger, L., MacGregor, S. 2011, submitted Table 1: Stellar and planetary parameter of HD 85512 Parameter [unit] HD 85512 (Pepe et al. 2011) Spectral Type K5V 7.67 V 1.156 B − V V variability < 0.016 11.15 Distance [pc] 7.43 MV 0.126 ± 0.008 L [Lsun] [Fe/H] [dex] −0.33 ± 0.03 0.69 M [Msun] 4715 ± 102 Teff [K] log g [cgs] 4.39 ± 0.28 v sin i [km s−1] < 3 47.13 ± 6.98 Prot [days] age [Gyr] 5.61 ± 0.61 Parameter [unit] HD 85512 b 58.43 (±0.13) P [days] 0.11 (±0.10) e msin i [MEarth] 3.6 (±0.5) 0.26 (±0.005) a [AU] Teq [K] 225 - 320
1710.06599	1	1710	2017-10-18T07:12:19	A history of violence: insights into post-accretionary heating in carbonaceous chondrites from volatile element abundances, Zn isotopes, and water contents	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Carbonaceous chondrites (CCs) may have been the carriers of water, volatile and moderately volatile elements to Earth. Investigating the abundances of these elements, their relative volatility, and isotopes of state-change tracer elements such as Zn, and linking these observations to water contents, provide vital information on the processes that govern the abundances and isotopic signatures of these species in CCs and other planetary bodies. Here we report Zn isotopic data for 28 CCs (20 CM, 6 CR, 1 C2-ung, and 1 CV3), as well as trace element data for Zn, In, Sn, Tl, Pb, and Bi in 16 samples (8 CM, 6 CR, 1 C2-ung, and 1 CV3), that display a range of elemental abundances from case-normative to intensely depleted. We use these data, water content data from literature and Zn isotopes to investigate volatile depletions and to discern between closed and open system heating. Trace element data have been used to construct relative volatility scales among the elements for the CM and CR chondrites. From least volatile to most, the scale in CM chondrites is Pb-Sn-Bi-In-Zn-Tl, and for CR chondrites it is Tl-Zn-Sn-Pb-Bi-In. These observations suggest that heated CM and CR chondrites underwent volatile loss under different conditions to one another and to that of the solar nebula, e.g. differing oxygen fugacities. Furthermore, the most water and volatile depleted samples are highly enriched in the heavy isotopes of Zn. Taken together, these lines of evidence strongly indicate that heated CM and CR chondrites incurred open system heating, stripping them of water and volatiles concomitantly, during post-accretionary shock impact(s).	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	A history of violence: insights into post-accretionary heating in carbonaceous chondrites from volatile element abundances, Zn isotopes, and water contents Brandon Mahan a,, Frédéric Moynier a,b, Pierre Beck b,c, Emily A. Pringle a, Julien Siebert a,b a Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 7154, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris Cedex 05 b Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France c UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS-INSU, Institut de Planétologie et d'Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), UMR 5274, Grenoble F-38041, France corresponding author, email: [email protected], phone: +33 (07) 62 93 56 12 Abstract Carbonaceous chondrites (CCs) may have been the carriers of water, volatile and moderately volatile elements to Earth. Investigating the abundances of these elements, their relative volatility, and isotopes of state-change tracer elements such as Zn, and linking these observations to water contents, provide vital information on the processes that govern the abundances and isotopic signatures of these species in CCs and other planetary bodies. Here we report Zn isotopic data for 28 CCs (20 CM, 6 CR, 1 C2-ung, and 1 CV3), as well as trace element data for Zn, In, Sn, Tl, Pb, and Bi in 16 samples (8 CM, 6 CR, 1 C2-ung, and 1 CV3), that display a range of elemental abundances from case-normative to intensely depleted. We use these data, water content data from literature and Zn isotopes to investigate volatile depletions and to discern between closed and open system heating. Trace element data have been used to construct relative volatility scales among the elements for the CM and CR chondrites. From least volatile to most, the scale in CM chondrites is Pb-Sn-Bi-In-Zn-Tl, and for CR chondrites it is Tl- Zn-Sn-Pb-Bi-In. These observations suggest that heated CM and CR chondrites underwent volatile loss under different conditions to one another and to that of the solar nebula, e.g. differing oxygen fugacities. Furthermore, the most water and volatile depleted samples are highly enriched in the heavy isotopes of Zn. Taken together, these lines of evidence strongly 1 indicate that heated CM and CR chondrites incurred open system heating, stripping them of water and volatiles concomitantly, during post-accretionary shock impact(s). 2 1. Introduction Carbonaceous chondrites (CCs) have long been recognized as early solar nebula remnants (e.g. Anders 1964; Palme et al. 2014), as their elemental abundances reveal striking similarities to that of the Sun's photosphere. These include the volatile elements, with 50% condensation temperatures under nebular condition (T50) between 180K and 665K, and the moderately volatile elements, 665K< T50 <1135K (T50 from Lodders, 2003), which act as measuring devices for the conditions of various planetary processes - accretion, differentiation, outgassing, etc. - due to their thermodynamic sensitivity (e.g. T, P, fO2 or oxygen fugacity). For ease of reading, these elements are hereafter collectively referred to simply as volatile. Additionally, similarities between the bulk hydrogen and nitrogen isotopic signatures of CCs and Earth imply that CCs may have supplied Earth with its inventory of water (e.g. Alexander et al., 2012). Linking observations between volatile element abundances, water content, and isotopic systems in CCs will further propel our understanding of thermal alteration and volatilization. Carbonaceous chondrites display depletions in volatile elements, in descending order of volatile element abundances from CI (Ivuna-type) to CV (Vigarano-type) (O'Neill and Palme 1998; Palme and O'Neill, 2014). These characteristic depletion trends have been attributed to various processes of volatility controlled elemental fractionation, including but not limited to: incomplete condensation in the early solar nebula during chondrite formation (e.g. Wasson and Chou 1974; O'Neill and Palme, 2008), two-component mixing (e.g. Anders, 1964), X-wind controlled formation (Shu et al., 1996), thermal processing in the solar system's parent molecular cloud (e.g. Huss et al., 2003), and/or inheritance from the interstellar medium (Yin, 2005). A succinct overview of these multiple working hypotheses, and references to their progenitors can be found in Bland et al. (2005). Whatever the process, or combination of processes, each CC type was endowed with a distinct initial signature of volatile element abundances (e.g. Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Lodders, 2003; Bland et al., 2005; Weisberg et al., 2006; Choe et al., 2010; Palme and O'Neill, 2014). After formation of the various chondrite components and emplacement of these primary features, secondary processes such as thermal and aqueous alteration began modifying their mineralogic and chemical composition (Huss et al., 2006), and the extent of alteration due to these processes has been integral to classification schemes of chondrites (e.g. van Schmus and Wood, 1967; Weisberg et al., 2006). 3 Historically, thermal alteration has been most often observed and most extensively studied in the ordinary chondrites (OCs), which display a range from un-metamorphosed (petrologic type 3) to highly metamorphosed (petrologic type 6) (Weisberg et al., 2006), wherein a higher degree of metamorphism lends also to a slight depletion in volatile elements (e.g. Zn, In, Cd, Bi, Tl) (Huss et al., 2006; Schaefer and Fegley 2010a). Thermal metamorphism in CCs is generally less pervasive and severe, with most having a petrologic type ≤3 (e.g. Weisberg et al., 2006). A clear exception to this are the CK chondrites (Karoonda-type), which display petrologic types 3-6, with a paucity in type 3, and depletions in volatile elements greater than those of the CV (Weisberg et al., 2006; Huss et al., 2006), making them less than ideal for a systematic study of volatile loss and isotopic fractionation (due to low concentrations) in CCs. Within the CM (Mighei-type) and CR (Renazzo-type) chondrites however, there are plentiful normative samples as well as samples that have been altered by thermal events, thanks largely to Antarctic missions garnering some 22,000+ samples (according to Johnson Space Center). These CM and CR chondrites provide an ideal sampling pool for investigating post-formation volatility loss, as a strong case-normative baseline can be established for both groups, and thermal events have been indicated for samples in both groups (e.g. Akai, 1992; Tonui et al., 2003, 2014; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998; Abreu and Bullock, 2013; Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Beck et al., 2014; Schrader et al., 2015), concomitant with severe loss of volatile elements (though still remaining in measurable amounts) (Paul and Lipschutz, 1989; Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998). Moreover, it has been posited that the heat source for such thermally altered CCs - at least in the case of the CM chondrites - may be different than that of the OCs, i.e. the prevalent heat source for many CCs was late in its history and of short duration compared to OCs, whose heating occurred earlier and for longer durations (e.g. Nakamura, 2006; Nakamura et al, 2006). Further investigation of heated CCs is thus necessary to differentiate between potential heat source(s). Aqueous alteration in carbonaceous chondrites ranges from essentially unaltered samples (petrologic type 3) to near complete hydration of silicates (petrologic type 1) (Weisberg et al., 2006). As a process, aqueous alteration is generally thought to have preceded thermal alteration in many CCs (e.g. Nakamura, 2005; Cloutis et al., 2012; Tonui et al., 2014), possibly even 4 beginning pre-accretion (Bischoff, 1998), and occurred at temperature conditions less than ~300C (down to ~0C) (e.g. Brearley, 2006). This hydration, in terms of the abundance of water, is most prevalent in the CI chondrites (~20 wt% water, petrologic type 1), with decreasing amounts in the CM (~9 wt%) and CR (<9 wt%) chondrites, most of which are of petrologic type 2 (Brearley, 2006; Garenne et al., 2014). Aqueous alteration is quite ubiquitous in CCs and its extent, conditions and timing are varied, though this does not appear to have any first order effects on volatile element concentrations (e.g. Rubin et al., 2007 for CM chondrites). Moreover, terrestrial weathering, which may contribute to the overall water budget of meteorites, shows no clear products (phyllosilicates/[oxy]hydroxides) (Cloutis et al., 2012; Garenne et al., 2014). However, the presence and abundance of water on the parent body(ies) of CCs can have a strong effect on the redox conditions prevalent during a subsequent heating event (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010b), and therefore may play an important (though indirect) role by changing the volatility of elements during volatilization (O'Neill and Palme, 2008). relationship weathering between grade and alteration Water, in any of its variously bound states (H2O, oxy-hydroxide minerals, hydroxyl groups; Garenne et al., 2014), may be liberated from a meteorite parent body via volatilization in the event of heating. In this scenario, the initial hydration of the chondrite can be inferred from petrologic evidence such as the presence and abundance of phyllosilicates (Garenne et al., 2014; Howard et al., 2015). Subsequent thermal alteration can then be inferred by the reversion of these phyllosilicates to anhydrous phases (e.g. Akai, 1992), the oxidation of iron (Beck et al., 2012), and through spectral reflectance properties (e.g. Cloutis et al., 2011, 2012). In addition to petrologic-based evidence for heating events, δD and H abundance analyses have been successfully employed to identify 'heated' specimens, specifically within the CM chondrite group (Alexander et al. 2012, 2013). In such manners, both the aqueous and thermal histories of heated meteorites can be discerned, and indeed have been documented in the literature for some CM and CR chondrites (e.g. Wang and Lipschutz, 1998; Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Garenne et al., 2014). Furthermore, volatile loss has also been simulated experimentally in CM chondrites by tracking the depletions of volatile elements (e.g. Zn, In, Bi, Tl, and Cd) as a function of temperature in controlled heating experiments of the Murchison (CM2) meteorite in a low pressure (~10-5 atm, or ~10 Pa) H2-rich environment analogous to the solar nebula (i.e. reducing 5 conditions), further indicating that volatilization upon heating can create distinct depletion trends in meteorites, however natural observations are not always in sync with such experimentally derived volatility sequences and depletions cannot be solely explained by the magnitude of heat (Matza and Lipschutz, 1977; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998; Nakamura, 2005). As the redox conditions prevailing during post-formation thermal alteration would affect the order of volatilization of the elements (e.g. O'Neill and Palme, 2008), condensation temperatures under solar nebula conditions (e.g. Lodders, 2003), as well as experiments in an H2-rich environment (Matza and Lipschutz, 1977), are not strictly applicable. Discrepancies such as these, as well as the discrepancies in estimates of conditions such as heating temperatures (e.g. Table 5 in Cloutis et al., 2012) clearly define a need for future work. Having such rich and varied literature regarding the CM and CR chondrites renders them ideal chondrite groups to use for investigating post-accretionary heating. By investigating multiple samples from these chondrite groups, we can explore the effects of heating on the water and volatile contents of carbonaceous chondrites, as well as the relative volatility of the different elements under conditions relevant to post-accretionary heating on CC parent bodies. Additionally, Zn isotopic composition has proven a very powerful tool for investigating evaporation processes, as Zn isotopes are strongly fractionated during volatilization, wherein preferential loss of the light isotopes to the gas phase occurs (e.g. Moynier et al., 2017). In this way, investigating the Zn isotopic signatures of CCs can provide further information on the conditions controlling volatile content variations, i.e. whether or not evaporative (or other) processes in an open system are responsible for the volatile element depletion, which should be evidenced by isotopically heavy residues (Day and Moynier, 2014). Moreover, these observations can further constrain the heating mechanism in CCs, its source(s) and timing, and thus provide substantial insights that compliment studies of organics, opaque mineral assemblages, and pre-solar grain abundances in CCs. Developing relative volatility trends for volatile elements in carbonaceous chondrites based on natural observations, and linking these observations to water contents and isotopic systems that act as state-change tracers, such as Zn, can provide a strong foundation upon which we can build a much richer and more complete comprehension of post-accretionary heating of CCs, honing our understanding of the 6 thermodynamic conditions (P, T, fO2) that created their volatile element abundance trends, as well as the heating mechanism(s) behind them. Here we have analyzed the Zn isotopic composition and volatile element contents for a suite of carbonaceous chondrites, including case-normative samples and those indicated as having incurred heating events, with a focus on the CM and CR chondrites. We have combined elemental data with literature data for trace elements (Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Paul and Lipschutz, 1989; Zolensky et al., 1992, 1997; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998) and water content (Alexander et al., 2012; Garenne et al., 2014) to determine the relative volatility of the investigated elements in the CM and CR chondrites, and to link depletions in volatile elements with variations in water content in CCs. Additionally, through a comparison of elemental concentrations, water content and Zn isotopic data, we have provided robust evidence for open- system volatilization of Zn, and thus presumably water and other species in meteorites (and/or their parent bodies) that have undergone heating above ~700C through post-accretionary impact heating. 2. Samples and Analytical Methods 2.1 Sampling pool For this study, carbonaceous chondrites from the CM and CR groups (as well as 1 CV3 and 1 ungrouped C2) were analyzed to provide a broad contextual range, including case- normative samples to provide a strong baseline, as well as samples with evidence of thermal events. CM and CR chondrites were the primary focus as there are abundant samples, including samples from both the CM and CR groups displaying evidence of heating events (e.g. Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Abreu, 2011; Abreu and Bullock, 2013; Beck et al., 2014; Tonui et al., 2014; Schrader et al., 2015), and therefore are of particular interest in regards to water content, volatile element concentrations and Zn isotopic fractionation. Approximately one half (13) of samples in the current study are demarcated as heated meteorites, many on the basis of H, C, and N abundances as evidenced in Alexander et al. (2012, 2013) and/or water contents as evidenced in Garenne et al. (2014). These include the CM chondrites ALH 84033, DOM 03183 (possibly heated), EET 87522, EET 96029, MAC 88100, MIL 05152 and MIL 07700. The two CM chondrites, PCA 02010 and PCA 02012, were included based on severe depletions in water 7 content and petrologic indications of heating (Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Garenne et al., 2014), as well as petrologic indications of intensive heating to at least 900C associated with shock impact for PCA 02012 (Nakato et al., 2013). The CM-like ungrouped C2 (C2-ung) meteorite EET 83355 was included based on its identification as heated, the availability of water content data and because it has been reported both as an ungrouped C2 (Wang and Lipschutz, 1998; Garenne et al., 2014) and as a C2/CM2 (Xia and Lipschutz, 1992; Alexander et al., 2013), and as such shares petro-chemical (petrology/mineralogy) similarities with CM chondrites. The CR chondrites GRA 06100 and GRO 03116 were included based on petrographic indicators of shock heating (e.g. Abreu, 2011) and severe depletion in water contents (Garenne et al., 2014). The reduced CV3 RBT 04133 was also included for its available water content data and petro- chemical similarity with the CR chondrites, as it was initially classified as a CR chondrite (Weisberg et al., 2008), but has subsequently been reclassified as a reduced CV3 (Davidson et al., 2014); furthermore, it has been identified by Davidson et al. (2014) as heated, based on C and N isotopes, maturation of organics, and low pre-solar grain abundance. Zinc isotopic analysis was conducted on 20 CM chondrites and 6 CR chondrites (+1 CV3 and 1 ungrouped C2), and trace element analysis was conducted on 8 CM chondrites and 6 CR (+1 CV3 and 1 ungrouped C2) chondrites from this sampling pool. 2.2 Dissolution and Chemical Purification Aliquots of ~50 mg for each sample were taken from larger powdered masses (approximately 1 g each) to ensure homogenized whole rock representation (e.g. Clayton and Mayeda, 1999; Schrader et al., 2011). All samples were dry-ground with mortar and pestle to a fine powder to facilitate chemical breakdown. Powdered samples were then dissolved in a concentrated HNO3 / HF mixture to ensure full digestion. Sample solutions were then dried and the residuum re-dissolved in 6M HCl to dissolve fluoride compounds. After sequential digestion, the samples were again dried down and the residuum re-dissolved in 1.5M HBr in preparation for ion exchange chromatography. Isolation of Zn ions from other species was achieved using an anion exchange resin (Bio-RadTM AG1 X8, 200-400 mesh) following the method used in a previous work (Mahan et al. 2017), and the technical details of which can be found elsewhere (Moynier et al., 2006; Moynier and LeBorgne, 2015). Prior to loading, the ion exchange resin was cleansed through repeated HNO3 and Milli-Q water passes. Once loaded onto the exchange 8 columns, Zn remains adsorbed to the resin as a bromine complex while other cationic species are eluted with HBr. Once elution of the matrix is completed, Zn is eluted using dilute (0.5M) HNO3, then subsequently dried down in preparation for isotopic analysis. 2.3 Zinc isotopic analysis (MC-ICPMS) All purified samples were dissolved in 0.1M HNO3 for isotopic analysis. Zinc isotope mass spectrometry was performed on these purified solutions using the Thermo Scientific Neptune Plus MC-ICPMS (multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer) at the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) following the method used in a previous work (Mahan et al. 2017), outfitted with an SSI quartz nebulizer / spray chamber (see Moynier and LeBorgne, 2015 for more details) and Faraday cups in conjunction with 1011 ohm resistors. Corrections for instrumental mass bias were performed using sample-standard bracketing with the JMC Lyon Zn reference solution (Marechal et al., 1999). δnZn for all samples have been reported relative to the JMC Lyon standard and calculated using conventional delta notation via Eq. 1, Equation (1) δ"Zn= 123 5678−1 ∗1000 / &")* &"' +,-./0 / &")* &"' where n = 66 or 68. All Zn fractionation reported within this study occurred through mass- dependent processes, and therefore only δ66Zn will be discussed hereafter in the text. Wherever possible, i.e. when sample concentrations were sufficiently high, Zn isotopic compositions were analyzed multiple times (at least 3 replicates for most samples). Errors for all isotopic analyses have been conventionally reported as two standard deviations (2σ). External reproducibility and accuracy of the entire methodology (dissolution, chemical purification, mass spectrometry) was rigorously evaluated concomitant with another study (Mahan et al., 2017), as samples and data for both projects were processed and acquired contemporaneously. In this evaluation, the 2σ error for the geostandard BHVO-2 was 0.02‰, and δ66Zn values obtained for the geostandards BHVO-2 (0.30 ±0.02‰) and AGV-2 (0.25 ±0.08‰) were in good agreement with reference values of 0.28 ±0.04‰ and 0.29 ±0.03‰ (Moynier et al. 2017). Moreover, five complete 9 replicates from samples containing Zn with different matrix materials yielded a 2σ error of 0.04‰. Taken together, these observations indicate high analytical precision and external reproducibility for the entire Zn isotope methodology. Isotopic data for all meteorites in the current study, along with water contents (Garenne et al., 2014), are detailed in Table 1. 2.4 Trace element analysis After sequential digestion, aliquots of all samples were taken from the HBr solutions, dried down, then re-dissolved in 1% HNO3 for trace element analysis with the Thermo Fisher Element 2 HR-ICPMS (high resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer) at IPGP. Sample solutions were diluted such that the elements of interest were in concentrations within the calibration range of the instrument. Calibration of the instrument was conducted prior to each session using a stock solution created from mixing aliquots of standard solutions with precisely known concentrations, and subsequently diluting this stock solution with 1% HNO3. Aliquot masses for all standard solutions, along with the mass of the 1% HNO3 dilutant, were directly measured so that precise concentrations of elements in the stock and calibration solutions could be calculated to ensure the most accurate data treatment possible. Calibration data and raw data generated by the mass spectrometer were then input into the open-access uFREASI (user- Friendly Elemental dAta procesSIng) software module (Tharaud et al., 2015) for calculation of trace element concentrations. Trace element concentrations for all samples can be found in Table 2. 3. Results 3.1 Zinc isotopes Ζinc isotope data for all samples have been reported in Table 1 along with petrologic type and weathering grade. Table 1 also reports water contents previously estimated by Garenne et al. (2014) or calculated stoichiometrically using H content from Alexander et al. (2012) and a 1/8 mass ratio of H to O in water. Error for all data are two times the standard deviations (2σ), and reproducibility for the entire method is 0.04‰ for δ66Zn as discussed in Section 2.3 and Mahan et al. (2017). For most CM and CR chondrites, δ66Zn values do not vary significantly and are on par with literature values (e.g. Luck et al., 2005; Moynier et al., 2017; Pringle et al., 2017). δ66Zn values for CM chondrites as a function of water content can be found in Fig. 1. The heated CM 10 chondrites PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 (5.42 ±0.44‰ and 16.73 ±0.09‰, respectively) and the heated CR chondrite GRO 03116 (4.77 ±0.03‰) (Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Garenne et al., 2014 for CMs; Abreu, 2011; Schrader et al., 2015 for CRs), which are the most volatile and water depleted samples in their respective groups (all below 3 wt% H2O), the δ66Zn values show significant enrichment in the heavy Zn isotopes (Tables 1 and 2). The heated CR chondrite GRA 06100 has a significantly negative δ66Zn value (-1.02 ±0.08‰) with no concomitant depletion in Zn. 3.2 Trace element contents Concentration data from HR-ICPMS for the elements Zn, In, Sn, Tl, Pb and Bi for a suite of carbonaceous chondrites (CM and CR) are listed in Table 2, along with δ66Zn and water contents (as H2O wt%, as in Table 1). Elemental abundances range from typical values in accord with reported averages in the literature (e.g. Lodders and Fegley, 1998), to intensely depleted in volatiles. Additionally, BHVO-2 was analyzed concomitant with other samples (Table 2) and the values determined are in good agreement with literature data (e.g. Barrat et al., 2012; Gale et al., 2013). Water contents have also been included in Table 2 for ease of reading. For comparison of relative abundances, CM and CR concentrations from this study along with literature data for Zn, Tl, Bi, and In (Table 3) have been normalized (via local maxima, see Section 4.1 for more details) and plotted against Zn as a reference element in Fig. 2 for CM chondrites and in Fig. 3 for CR chondrites. Normalized element concentrations for the type 2 CM chondrites have been plotted against water contents in Fig. 4 in order to investigate volatile element depletion as a function of water content. Elemental abundances for CM chondrites in Fig. 4 display normative values to a threshold water content (H2O wt%) in the sample of ~5 wt%, below which the volatile element abundances become significantly depleted, specifically for carbonaceous chondrites reported to have undergone extensive heating, e.g. the CM chondrites PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 (Alexander et al., 2012; Garenne et al., 2014) (Table 2, Fig. 4). The CR chondrite GRO 03116, also reported to have undergone a heating event (Abreu, 2011; Alexander et al., 2013; Briani et al., 2013), likewise displays intensely depleted volatile element abundances concomitant with low water contents (Table 2). The heated CR chondrite GRA 06100 (e.g. Abreu, 2011) displays an anomalous and significantly negative δ66Zn value with no concomitant depletion in Zn abundance (63 ±9ppm), and equally vexingly displays an anomalously high Pb 11 concentration (7.58 ±2.93ppm). The most volatile-rich CR chondrite investigated, GRO 95577, has been previously classified as a CR1 chondrite due to its extensive aqueous alteration, and does not display depletions in chalcophile elements characteristic of CRs (Weisberg and Huber, 2007). Trace element data from this study for GRO 95577 agree with the observations of Weisberg and Huber (2007), wherein the abundances of the volatile elements approximate ~60% CI. 4. Discussion 4.1 Volatility in CM and CR chondrites The canonical scale of volatility for the elements is defined by the temperature at which 50% of an element is condensed into the solid phases under solar nebula conditions (T50), i.e. in a highly reducing H2 environment with a logfO2 of approximately -20 (or IW-7) at low pressure (~10 Pa) (e.g. Lodders, 2003). However, it is well known that the volatility of an element depends on the speciation of the element in the gas and in the solids and therefore it is strongly dependent on redox conditions. This factor may then largely contribute to the re-arrangement of element volatility trends in CCs in comparison to that of Lodders (2003). These changes in redox state have been attributed to the fact that post-accretionary, post-hydration heating conditions occur under different conditions than nebular condensation, i.e. in more hydrated and therefore more oxidizing conditions and most likely at varying temperature and pressure conditions than that of the solar nebula (e.g. O'Neill and Palme, 2008). Therefore, to better understand the depletions of volatile elements observed in carbonaceous chondrites, it is vital to characterize the volatility of these elements in an appropriate reference frame. Previous experimental work (Matza and Lipschutz, 1977) has determined the relative volatility (or thermal mobility) of a suite of elements in the Murchison CM2 meteorite via heating experiments carried out in a low- pressure environment (~10 Pa), and literature data for heated meteorites are in general agreement with this depletion trend (e.g. Matza and Lipschutz, 1977; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998). However, observations on natural samples have not been investigated as a complimentary means of determining the relative volatility of elements in carbonaceous chondrites (though a similar approach has been taken for ordinary chondrites, see Schaefer and Fegley, 2010a). 12 By investigating the volatile element contents in CM and CR chondrites, including case- normative samples as well as samples that have undergone heating events, it is possible to construct relative volatility scales for these meteorite groups. These can be determined by first normalizing concentration data for all samples, wherein concentrations for each element are normalized to a local maximum, i.e. the largest value for a given element within each respective dataset, then plotting these normalized values relative to a reference element (Zn in the current study). Data for each element determined through HR-ICPMS in the current study were normalized to their respective local maxima. Likewise, data for each element from the literature, determined via neutron activation analysis (NAA), were normalized to local maxima for the literature dataset. Normalization by this approach was used as it removes methodological artifacts (i.e. differences in acquisition media, calibration, etc.) and more importantly because via such normalization all data are given the same index, and therefore the slope calculated by plotting each element against Zn (with Zn on the x-axis) denotes the volatility of that element relative to Zn, wherein the largest slope indicates that the element is the most volatile, and vice versa. Plots of M/Zn (where M is the other element) for CM chondrites can be found in Fig. 2, and values for the slope, y-intercept and coefficient of determination (R2) for each element pair can be found therein along with corresponding errors (1σ) in parentheses. Where available, data from literature (Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Paul and Lipschutz, 1989; Zolensky et al., 1992, 1997; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998) have been included to provide the most robust assessment possible (see Table 3). Using this approach, the relative volatility in CM chondrites for the six elements investigated - from least volatile to most – has been determined as Pb-Sn-Bi-In-Zn-Tl. It should be noted that this is the most likely order of volatility for the CM chondrites, however as the variation in slope is small relative to the uncertainties, different trends cannot be ruled out at this time. The same approach has been applied to the CR chondrites in the current study (Fig. 3), yielding a relative volatility scale of Tl-Zn-Sn-Pb-Bi-In (see Table 4). Figures 2f and 3f ("CM gradient" and "CR gradient") display the slopes for all elements as a function of their respective y-intercept. The relationship between the slope and y-intercept is such that as the volatility of a given element decreases relative to Zn, the amount of that element remaining after all Zn has been exhausted increases (e.g. Sn and Tl in Fig. 3). 13 The relative volatility scales for both CM and CR chondrites determined via this method are different than the volatility trend for solar nebula conditions (Table 4), which may indicate a change in conditions, such as an increase in fO2 (O'Neill and Palme, 2008), illustrating the necessity of constructing relative volatility scales for the elements which inherently consider the conditions and myriad processes that produce the abundance trends we observe in heated carbonaceous chondrites. Once established, these relative volatility scales can provide important information about the conditions of post-accretionary heating such as temperature (e.g. Wang and Lipschutz, 1998), fO2 (e.g. O'Neill and Palme, 2008), and pressure (Schaefer and Fegley (2010a) for ordinary chondrites) for volatile elements. For example, the conditions of element mobilization (e.g. via volatilization) in the CM and CR chondrites were likely more oxidizing than that of their formation in the solar nebula (e.g. Lange and Ahrens, 1982; Schaefer and Fegley, 2010b). Under the more reducing conditions of the solar nebula, elements such as Zn and In become more volatile (O'Neill and Palme, 2008), a trend observed for In (but not Zn) when comparing our CM volatility scale with that of Lodders (2003). Obvious causes for the observed variations between these scales cannot be extracted from observables at this time, however it is known the volatility of Zn changes as a function of pressure, being ~1500K at 1 bar and decreasing to ~850K at 10-5 bar (in silicates) (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010a), and that the volatility of elements is also heavily influenced by kinetic factors such as diffusion (Ikramuddin et al., 1977). As such, it is likely that a combination of factors (T, P, fO2) has produced such differences between the relative volatility trends of CCs and the solar nebula. Additionally, the relative volatility scale(s) developed herein appear different to that determined by the experiments of Matza and Lipschutz (1977) (Table 4). As with the variations compared to solar nebula volatility, this suggests that the conditions of these experiments are different to those experienced by the heated CCs in this study, producing a re-arrangement of element volatility, notably for Zn in CM chondrites. A comparison of our volatility trend(s) to that of Matza and Lipschutz (1977) suggests that the heating conditions for the CMs PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 were at high temperature (at and above ~700°C), and therefore include the enhanced mobility of Zn observed at 700°C in their experimental study, an observation not visible when comparing condensation temperatures alone. When considering the volatile element depletion trend of Matza and Lipschutz (1977) for Murchison at 700°C, our data are in good agreement with theirs. 14 The relative volatility scales determined herein for the CM and CR chondrites are quite similar, with the exception that Zn and Tl have exchanged positions at opposite ends of the scale(s), i.e. Tl is the most volatile in the CMs and least volatile in the CRs, and the relative volatility of Zn decreases from CM to CR chondrites, and that the volatility of In is enhanced in the CR chondrites. If the relative volatilities of these elements are indeed different between the two chondrite groups, this would suggest that the CM and CR chondrites may have experienced thermal alteration under different conditions. A possible explanation for the change in volatility for In may lie in the fact that its volatility can change markedly as a function of fO2, i.e. it displays a decrease in volatility with increasing fO2 (O'Neill and Palme, 2008). This coupled with the observed high(er) water content of CM chondrites compared to CRs (e.g. Alexander et al,. 2012; Garenne et al., 2014) may indicate that an ephemeral impact-generated atmosphere of a CM chondrite parent body would be more hydrous, and thus more oxidized, than that of a CR chondrite parent body (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010b; Garenne et al., 2014), thus decreasing the volatility of In in CM chondrites relative to CRs. Understanding the reversal of volatility for Zn and Tl is less straightforward. As previously discussed, the volatility of Zn is significantly enhanced at and above 700°C (Matza and Lipschutz, 1977) and at lower pressure (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010a), and therefore it's dampened volatility in the CR chondrites may indicate an overall lower temperature range and higher pressure for volatilization in the CR chondrites studied. Moreover, the volatility of elements such as Zn (and perhaps Bi and Sn), with a dominant oxidation state of 2+, decrease with increasing fO2 and should be less volatile than Tl, which is monovalent in meteorites (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010a), in more oxidizing conditions (O'Neill and Palme, 2008), in qualitative agreement with our results for the CM chondrites (Table 4). It is also possible that this observation is due to some other control(s) - composition, thermal diffusion, the inclusion of GRO 95577. Most likely, many or all of these parameters impact the relative volatility of the elements, however the relative importance and efficacy of each parameter is beyond the scope of the current work. Determining the exact causality of these changes in volatility, and disentangling the inputs from these various parameters - as well as constraining other possible factors (e.g. composition, thermal diffusion, phyllosilicate fraction) - through further experimental work and discovery is at the forefront of future work. 15 The comparisons between our relative volatility trend(s) and those from thermodynamic considerations and experiments exemplify the power and utility of developing volatility scales from natural observations and extracting information from their similarities and differences. Developing such scales for the various meteorite types that are based on natural observations, and thus inherently account for the multitude of variables that may be (and likely are) at play during post-accretionary heating, such as fO2, pressure, composition, diffusion, host phases, and temperature variability (Schaefer and Fegley, 2010a; Matza and Lipschutz, 1977), will further advance are understanding of the complex interplay of these controls during heating on meteorite parent bodies. 4.2 Volatilization, dehydration, and open-system heating Volatile element abundances observed in the current study span a broad range, from canonical values to intensely depleted; moreover, water contents for samples in the current study range from case-normative to intensely depleted (Table 2). Fig. 4 displays the normalized abundances of volatile elements investigated in this study for CM chondrites as a function of water content (H2O wt%) as determined by Garenne et al. (2014), or calculated stoichiometrically from Alexander et al. (2012). Volatile element abundances are case-normative for the majority of the samples, and are congruent with literature data (Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Zolensky et al., 1992, 1997; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998). The constancy of volatile element contents across a range of water contents from ~5 wt% up to ~14 wt%, strongly reaffirms the notion that that the degree of aqueous alteration itself does not appear to affect bulk volatile element contents. Moreover, this constancy at water contents above ~5 wt%, which samples a spectrum of phyllosilicate to (oxy)hydroxide ratios (see Garenne et al., 2014) and weathering grades (see Table 1), further suggests that neither the type(s) of aqueous alteration nor the degree of terrestrial weathering significantly affects the volatile element contents. However, significant depletions in volatile elements are seen after a threshold water content of ~5 wt% in the current study (Fig. 4). The exact position of this threshold is unclear, however, as the meteorite EET 83355 (at 3.6 wt% H2O), though sometimes reported as C2/C2M (Xia and Lipschutz, 1992; Alexander et al., 2013), is reported elsewhere (Wang and Lipschutz, 1998; Garenne et al., 2014) as an ungrouped C2, and therefore its initial elemental content may differ from the rest of the data set. 16 Many of the heated CM chondrites in Figure 4 display similar volatile element contents to the case-normative, unheated chondrites, and furthermore do not display enrichments in heavy isotopes of Zn, with δ66Zn values tightly clustered around case-normative values (Fig. 1 and Moynier et al., 2017). This indicates that the heating events these sample incurred were at viable temperatures for liberating H, C, and N, but not elements of lower volatility such as those investigated herein. This interpretation is consistent with canonical element volatility calculations (e.g. Lodders, 2003) for these elements, as well as with the heating classification scheme of Alexander et al. (2012/2013). That the heated ungrouped C2 chondrite EET 83355 (Nakamura, 2005; Alexander et al., 2012, 2013) and heated CV chondrite RBT 04133 (Davidson et al., 2014) do not display depletions in the elements studied herein and do not display enrichments in the heavy Zn isotopes is also consistent with this interpretation, as EET 83355 (EET 87522 as well) is estimated to have been heated below 300°C (Nakamura, 2005) and RBT 04133 to approximately 440°C (Davidson et al., 2014), temperatures below that necessary to volatilize Zn (or other elements studied herein) (e.g. Matza and Lipschutz, 1977). The curious data for the heated CR chondrite GRA 06100, with a nominally average Zn concentration and high Pb concentration, along with a negative δ66Zn, is suggestive of either heating above 700°C followed by disproportionate condensation of Zn and Pb back onto the parent body, or of large scale element mobilization due to impact heating, both of which could possibly produce these data. However, GRA 06100 requires further investigation in order to understand its complex history and substantiate any such hypotheses. Of particular note are the two CM chondrites PCA 02010 and PCA 02012, as well as the CR chondrite GRO 03116, which all display highly depleted volatile element abundance patterns, and when we compare these results with water content data in literature (Garenne et al., 2014), we find that these samples are also significantly dehydrated. Importantly, the δ66Zn values for these samples determined in the current study are significantly enriched in the heavy Zn isotopes relative to normative values (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1), wherein enrichments greater than approximately 0.6 ‰ are difficult to explain by igneous processes (Moynier et al., 2017) and are indicative of evaporative processes (e.g. Moynier et al., 2009, 2011; Day et al., 2017a). This interpretation is also in line with that of Nakato et al. (2013), wherein a heating event at or above 17 900C was inferred for PCA 02012. Taken together, all lines of evidence provide a strong argument for the occurrence of post-accretionary thermal alteration with enough energy to induce significant heating well above 700°C in these samples, thus liberating volatile elements such as Zn. The three isotope plot in Fig. 5 displays δ68Zn and δ66Zn for all samples from Table 1, graphically illustrating that mass-dependent process(es) have produced all measured isotopic signatures in the current study, with a slope of 1.99 (R2 = 0.99), in good agreement with theoretical predictions for a kinetic isotopic fractionation and with previous work (e.g. Luck et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013; Pringle et al., 2017). Moreover, Fig. 5 clearly illustrates the exceptionally high δ66Zn values of the CM chondrites PCA 02010 and PCA 02012, and the CR chondrite GRO 03116, strongly indicating that these samples underwent volatile loss of Zn via a mass-dependent, kinetic process such as evaporation. Furthermore, there are no known samples with such isotopically heavy values as those measured in the samples discussed above (e.g. Luck et al., 2005; Pringle et al., 2017; Paniello et al., 2012ab; Herzog et al., 2009; Kato et al. 2015; Day et al., 2017b), and moreover the majority of terrestrial processes produce δ66Zn values less than 1 ‰ (Moynier et al., 2017), thus making terrestrial weathering an unlikely culprit for such values. Without any calculation, it is clear that the δ66Zn (and δ68Zn) values of PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 are incoherent with pure or non-ideal Rayleigh distillation - a possible evaporative regime - as a singular process, as this would require that PCA 02010 display the higher δ66Zn value of the two, and such is not the case (Fig. 1 and 5). The δ66Zn value obtained for PCA 02012 is in accord with a non-ideal kinetic isotope fractionation, wherein isotopic fractionation of Zn by evaporation is dampened due to inefficient and/or partial evaporation, leading to a higher fractionation factor (0.999, versus ~0.993 for Zn complexed to Cl or S in pure Rayleigh distillation) (see Day and Moynier (2014) for Zn isotopic fractionation via Rayleigh distillation in both regimes, and associated fractionation factors). A possible explanation for the limited isotopic fractionation of PC 02010 is that at the very low concentrations of PCA 02010, even a minute amount of isotopically lighter Zn contamination could have severely dampened its heavy isotopic signature. Another viable possibility is that PCA 02010 incurred Zn evaporation at a higher pressure than PCA 02012 in a kinetic mass-dependent fractionation regime, which would likely cause a faster rate of evaporation concomitant with attenuated enrichment in the heavy 18 isotopes of Zn (Young et al., 1998). Regardless of evaporative regime or any contamination that may have dampened, or otherwise affected, the high δ66Zn value of PCA 02010, intense isotopic fractionation of Zn via evaporation remains the most plausible explanation for the δ66Zn values observed for PCA 02010, as well as for the CM chondrite PCA 02012 and the CR chondrite GRO 03116. The heavy Zn isotopic signatures of these samples provide very robust evidence that whatever thermal event(s) these samples incurred happened in an open system, thus allowing for the intense isotopic fractionation of Zn observed in this study. 4.3 Sources and conditions for heating and volatile transport in CM and CR chondrites The dynamics of parent body accretion are generally thought to be low-energy, "gentle" impacts, and therefore accretionary processes are unlikely to be a source of significant heating in chondrite parent bodies (Melosh, 1990; Wood and Pellas, 1991; Ghosh et al., 2006). Solar winds are focused at the poles of T Tauri stars and not the matter-inhabited mid-plane, thus it is also unlikely that electromagnetic induction could have supplied enough energy to significantly heat these meteorite parent bodies (Wood and Pellas, 1991; Ghosh et al., 2006; Huss et al., 2006). Radioactive heating by short-lived radionuclides – namely 26Al and 60Fe – cannot be disregarded as a possible heat source, however it is difficult to reconcile the intense volatile element depletions and heavy Zn isotopic signatures observed in the current study with the canonical onion shell model for thermal metamorphism (e.g. Trieloff et al., 2003), wherein internal heating via radioactive decay occurs and metamorphic grade decreases radially from the center of the parent body. Moreover, radioactive heating, for example by the decay of 26Al, has a minimum requisite heating time of 0.7 million years (one half-life), a duration which engenders Fe-Mg inter-diffusion between chondrules and matrix (Nakamura et al, 2006), a feature not exhibited in the CM chondrite PCA 02012 (Nakato et al., 2013) or the CR chondrite GRO 03116 (Schrader et al., 2015). Solar radiative heating via an orbit passing inside ~ 0.1 AU is another potential heat source for solar system materials, is similar to radioactive decay in duration and requisite peak temperatures for dehydrating phyllosilicates, and thus bares similar mineralogical and chemical consequences, however its timing is different, being later than radioactive heating (Nakamura, 2005). Again, the lack of evidence PCA 02012 and GRO 03116 for long duration heating render this an unlikely heat source. Therefore, none of the preceding potential sources seem to produce 19 viable conditions on short enough timescales to produce the cumulative observations for the most water and volatile depleted samples within our study. Shock metamorphism via impact, on the other hand, has been invoked to explain the low water contents and peculiar coloration of PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 (Garenne et al., 2014), the maturation of organics and overall petrography of PCA 02012 (Nakato et al., 2013) and indicated via petrographic evidence in GRO 03116 (melt veining, compacted matrix and foliation) (Abreu, 2011; Schrader et al., 2015). Therefore, shock metamorphism is the most plausible and most likely energy source (e.g. Bischoff and Stöffler, 1992; Nakamura, 2005) for these carbonaceous chondrites, as it is capable of producing both the volatile element depletions and the large isotopic fractionations in Zn (e.g. Moynier et al., 2010, 2017) observed in these samples without producing Fe-Mg diffusion characteristic of long(er) duration heating (e.g. Nakamura, 2006; Schrader et al., 2015), such as that seen in thermally altered ordinary chondrites (Nakamura et al., 2006). Furthermore, impact shock as a process is capable of producing peak temperatures well in excess of 700°C (beyond 2000°C in porous materials such as CM chondrites), and can thusly liberate volatile elements to the extent exhibited in the most water and volatile depleted samples of the current study (Bischoff and Stöffler, 1992; Beck et al., 2007; Garenne et al., 2014). Additionally, heating by impact is a relatively short-duration, localized process, i.e. one that affects only the body that incurs it (possibly not even in its entirety) and is thus non- ubiquitous in the solar system, a fact in line with the exceptionality of heated CM and CR chondrites. Therefore, volatile loss by evaporation due to impact heating on a CM or CR parent body stands out as the most plausible scenario, an interpretation that is also consistent with the recent observation of Si isotopic fractionation in angrite meteorites, which show variables enrichments in the heavier isotopes of Si (Pringle et al., 2014). Moreover, it has been shown that impact shocks were at the origin of volatile element variability and isotopic composition of Zn in ureilites, in which δ66Zn strongly correlates with the shock grade, and the highly shocked samples displayed the heaviest δ66Zn values concomitant with the lowest Zn abundances (Moynier et al., 2010). Terrestrial analogs, such as tektites and trinitites (Moynier et al., 2009; Day et al., 2017a, respectively) mirror such observations, wherein the volatile-depleted glasses produced show significant enrichments in the heavy isotopes of Zn. Further to this point, such enrichments in heavy Zn isotopes are generally not seen in ordinary chondrites, which often 20 dominantly display δ66Zn values less than 1 ‰ (Moynier et al., 2017), suggesting a fundamental difference in the prevalent source of heat. The observed strong enrichment in heavy Zn isotopes in the intensely volatile depleted CM chondrites PCA 02010 and PCA 02012, as well as the CR chondrite GRO 03116, are in accord with such observations, and their linkage to impact shock processes provide robust evidence that shock heating was the prevalent source of their volatile depletion and intense Zn isotopic fractionation. In summary, the observations of the current study provide very strong evidence that post-accretionary impact shock was the dominant heat source for these carbonaceous chondrites. These observations in conjunction with insights from other solar system materials and terrestrial analogs suggest that, contrary to the ordinary chondrites, which suffered appreciably longer (and earlier) heating events (Nakamura et al., 2006), the most likely and prevalent heat source for thermal alteration on CCs is post- accretionary impact shock. 5. Conclusions We have reported MC-ICPMS Zn isotopic data and HR-ICPMS trace element data for a suite of CM and CR carbonaceous chondrites. We have used trace element data for Zn, In, Sn, Tl, Pb and Bi in conjunction with literature data in order to develop and apply an empirical method for determining the relative volatility of these elements during post-accretionary heating in the CM and CR chondrites. These results indicate that the order of volatility in CMs is Pb-Sn- Bi-In-Zn-Tl, and in CRs is Tl-Zn-Sn-Pb-Bi-In. This order is different from the scale obtained under nebular condition (Bi-Pb-Zn-Sn-In-Tl) and suggest that thermal alteration in the CM (PCA 02010, PCA 02012) and CR (GRO 03116) chondrites occurred under different conditions than that of their formation. Furthermore, the difference in the sequence of depletion between CM and CR chondrites suggests that they may have experienced thermally driven element mobilization and dehydration under different conditions, and specifically that the CM chondrites may have been heated under more oxidative conditions than the CR chondrites. A comparison of our elemental data with water content data from literature (Alexander et al., 2012, 2013; Garenne et al., 2014) shows a distinct relationship between volatile element concentrations in the CM chondrites (and to a lesser constrained degree in the CRs) and their water contents. This observation provides very strong evidence that a direct link exists between the volatile elements and water contents of carbonaceous chondrites, and suggests that the same may then be true for 21 larger planetary bodies such as Earth. Moreover, while previous studies (e.g. Paul and Lipschutz, 1989; Garenne et al., 2014) tentatively invoked open-system thermal alteration as the most straightforward means to account for volatile element and water depletions in carbonaceous chondrites, our study provides concrete evidence that these thermal events took place in an open system, as it was found that the most volatile and water depleted samples are also those displaying remarkably high δ66Zn values, suggesting preferential loss of light Zn isotopes to the gas phase during open-system evaporation. The Zn isotopic data from this study, linked with water content and petrologic data, strongly indicate that impact shock was the most likely and dominant heat source for the CM and CR chondrites. Moreover, these observations highlight the necessity of – and opportunity for – more observational and experimental work aimed at investigating the volatility of elements in meteoritic materials under more relevant conditions, i.e. under higher pressures and oxygen fugacities (relative to the solar nebula) that most likely prevailed during heating events on carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies and other telluric bodies, as well as incorporating kinetic processes such as diffusion through varying compositional and spatial contexts. As the origin and eventual fate of these elements in meteorites and Earth are intimately linked, progressing our understanding of their volatility during post-accretionary thermal processing in meteorites will provide us with more direct links to these processes on Earth and other planetary bodies. Acknowledgments The authors very kindly thank Dr. Devin Schrader and two anonymous reviewers, whose input has substantially enhanced the framework and discussion of the manuscript. We also sincerely thank James Day, Manuel Moreira, Bruce Fegley, Katharina Lodders, Paolo Sossi, and Zhengbin Deng for fruitful discussions. BM thanks Julien Moureau, and Mickaël Tharaud for their respective expertise with MC-ICPMS and Element 2 mass spectrometry, as well as Delphine Limmois and Laeticia Faure for their help in the clean laboratory. BM and EP thank the financial support of the IDEX USPC through PhD fellowships. JS and BM thank the financial support of the French National Research Agency (ANR Project VolTerre, grant no. ANR-14-CE33-0017-01). FM and JS thank the financial support of the UnivEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cité (ANR-10-LABX-0023 and ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02). FM acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under the H2020 framework 22 program/ERC grant agreement #637503 (Pristine), and the ANR through a chaire d'excellence Sorbonne Paris Cité. Parts of this work were supported by IPGP multidisciplinary program PARI, and by Region Île-de-France SESAME Grant no. 12015908. References Abreu N.M. (2011) Petrographic evidence of shock metamorphism in CR2 chondrite GRO 03116 (abstract #5211). Meteoritics & Planetary Science 46:A4. Abreu N.M. and Bullock E.S. (2013) Opaque assemblages in CR2 Graves Nunataks (GRA) 06100 as indicators of shock-driven hydrothermal alteration in the CR chondrite parent body. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 48, 2406-2429. Akai J. (1992) T-T-T diagram of serpentine and saponite, and estimation of metamorphic heating degree of Antarctic carbonaceous chondrites. Antarct. Meteor. Res. 5, 120-135. Alexander C.M. O'D., Bowden R., Fogel M.L., Howard K.T., Herd C.D.K, Nittler L.R. (2012) The provenances of asteroids, and their contributions to the volatile inventories of the terrestrial planets. Science 337, 721-723. Alexander C.M. O'D., Howard K.T., Bowden R., Fogel M.L. (2013) The classification of CM and CR chondrites using bulk H, C, and N abundances and isotopic compositions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 123, 244-260. Anders E. (1964) Origin, age, and composition of meteorites. Space Sci. Rev. 3, 583-714. Barrat J. A., Zanda B., Moynier F., Bollinger C., Liorzou C., Bayon G. (2012) Geochemistry of CI chondrites: Major and trace elements, and Cu and Zn Isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 83, 79–92. Beck P., De Andrade V., Orthous-Daunay F-R., Veronesi G., Cotte M., Quirico E., Schmitt B. (2012) The redox state of iron in the matrix of CI, CM, and metamorphosed CM chondrites by XANES spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 99, 305-316. Beck P., Ferroir T., Gillet P. (2007) Shock-induced compaction, melting, and entrapment of atmospheric gases in Martian meteorites. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L01203. Beck P., Garenne A., Quirico E., Bonal L., Montes-Hernandez G., Moynier F., Schmitt B. (2014) Transmission infrared spectra (2-25µm) of carbonaceous chondrites (CI, CM, CV-CK, CR, C2 ungrouped): mineralogy, water, and asteroidal processes. Icarus 229, 263-277. 23 Bischoff A. (1998) Aqueous alteration of carbonaceous chondrites: evidence for preaccretionary alteration – a review. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 33, 1113-1122. Bischoff A. and Stöffler D. (1992) Shock metamorphism as a fundamental process in the evolution of planetary bodies: information from meteorites. Eur. J. Mineral. 4, 707-755. Bland P.A., Alard O., Benedix G.K., Kearsley A.T., Menzies O.N., Watt L.E., Rogers N.W. (2005) Volatile the early solar system and chondrule/matrix complementarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (39), 13755-13760. Brearley A.J. (2006) The action of water. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II (ed. fractionation in Lauretta D.S., McSween (Jr.) H.Y). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 587-624. Briani G., Quirico E., Gounelle M., Paulhiac-Pison M., Montagnac G., Beck P., Orthous-Daunay F-R., Bonal L., Jacquet E., Kearsley A., Russell S.S. (2013) Short duration thermal metamorphism in CR chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 122, 267–279. Chen H., Nguyen B.M., Moynier F. (2013a) Zinc isotopic composition of iron meteorites: absence of isotopic anomalies and origin of the volatile element depletion. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 48, 2441-2450. Choe W.H., Huber H., Rubin A.E., Kallemeyn G.W., Wasson J.T. (2010) Compositions and taxonomy of 15 unusual carbonaceous chondrites. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 45, 531-554. Clayton R.N. and Mayeda T.K. (1999) Oxygen isotope studies of carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 2089–2104. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J., Mann P. (2011) Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites 2: CM chondrites. Icarus 216, 309-346. Cloutis E.A., Hudon P., Hiroi T., Gaffey M.J. (2012) Spectral reflectance properties of carbonaceous chondrites 4: aqueously altered and thermally metamorphosed meteorites. Icarus 220, 586-617. Davidson J., Schrader D.L., Busemann H., Franchi I.A., Connolly H.C. Jr., Lauretta D.S., Alexander C.M.O.'D., Verchovsky A., Greenwood R.C. (2014) Petrography, stable isotope compositions, microRaman spectroscopy and presolar components of Roberts Massif 04133: a reduced CV3 carbonaceous chondrite. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 49, 2133-2151. Day J.M.D. and Moynier F. (2014) Evaporative fractionation of volatile stable isotopes and their bearing on the origin of the moon. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130259. 24 Day J.M.D., Moynier F., Meshik A.P., Pradivtseva O.V., Petit D.R. (2017a) Evaporation fractionation of zinc during the first nuclear detonation. Science Advances 3, e1602668. Day J.M.D., Moynier F., Shearer C.K. (2017b) Late-stage magmatic outgassing from a volatile- depleted Moon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (36), DOI: 10.1073. Gale A., Dalton C.A., Langmuir C.H., Su Y., Schilling J-G. (2013) The mean composition of ocean ridge basalts. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 14, 489-518. Garenne A., Beck P., Montes-Hernandez G., Chiriac R., Toche F., Quirico E., Bonal L., Schmitt B. (2014) The abundance and stability of "water" in type 1 and 2 carbonaceous chondrites (CI, CM, and CR). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 137, 93-112. Ghosh A., Weidenschilling S.J., McSween H.Y. Jr., Rubin A. (2006) Asteroidal heating and thermal stratification of the asteroid belt. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II (ed. Lauretta D.S., McSween (Jr.) H.Y). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 555-566. Herzog G.F., Moynier F., Albarède F., Berezhnoy A.A. (2009) Isotopic and elemental abundances of copper and zinc in lunar samples, Pele's hairs, and a terrestrial basalt. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 5884-5904. Howard K.T., Alexander C.M.O.'D., Schrader D.L., Dyl K.A. (2015) Classification of hydrous meteorites (CR, CM, and C2 ungrouped) by phyllosilicate fraction: PSD-XRD modal mineralogy and planetesimal enironments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 149, 206–222. Huss G.R., Meshik A.P., Smith J.B., Hohenberg C.M. (2003) Presolar diamond, silicon carbide, and graphite in carbonaceous chondrites: Implications for thermal processing in the solar nebula. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4823-4848. Huss G.R., Rubin A.E., Grossman J.N. (2006) Thermal metamorphism in chondrites. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System (ed. Lauretta D.S., McSween (Jr.) H.Y). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 567-586. Ikramuddin M., Matza S., Lipschutz M.E. (1977) Thermal metamorphism of primitive meteorites – V. Ten trace elements in Tieschitz H3 chondrite heated at 400-1000°C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 1247-1256. Kato C., Moynier F., Valdes M.C., Dhaliwal J.K., Day J.M.D. (2015) Extensive volatile loss during formation and differentiation of the Moon. Nat. Comm. 6 (7617). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8617. 25 Lange M.A. and Ahrens T.J. (1982) The evolution of an impact-generated atmosphere. Icarus 51, 96-120. Lodders K. (2003) Solar system abundances and condensation temperatures of the elements. Astrophys. J. 591, 1220–1247. Lodders K. and Fegley (Jr.), B. (1998) In The Planetary Scientist's Companion. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. pp. 311-317. Luck J.M., Ben Othman D., Albarède F. (2005) Zn and Cu isotopic variations in chondrites and iron meteorites: early solar nebula reservoirs and parent-body processes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 5351-5363. Mahan B., Siebert J., Pringle E.A., Moynier F. (2017) Elemental partitioning and isotopic fractionation of Zn between metal and silicate and geochemical estimation of the S content of the Earth's core. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 196, 252-270. Marechal N., Telouk P., Albarède F. (1999) Precise analysis of copper and zinc isotopic compositions by plasma-source mass spectrometry. Chem. Geol. 156, 251–273. Matza S.D., Lipschutz M.E. (1977) Thermal metamorphism of primitive meteorites – VI. Eleven trace elements in Murchison C2 chondrite heat at 400-1000°C. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 8, 161-176. Melosh, H.J. (1990) Giant impacts and the thermal state of the early Earth. In Origin of the Earth (ed. H.E. Newsom and J.H. Jones), Oxford University, New York, pp. 69-84. Moynier F., Albarède F., Herzog G.F. (2006) Isotopic composition of zinc, copper, and iron in lunar samples. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 6103–6117. Moynier F. and Le Borgne M. (2015) High precision zinc isotopic measurements applied to mouse organs. J. Vis. Exp. 99, e52479. Moynier F., Beck P., Jourdan F., Yin Q.-Z., Reimold U., Koeberl C. (2009) Isotopic fractionatino of Zn in tektites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 277, 482–489. Moynier F., Beck P., Yin Q.-Z., Ferroir T., Barrat J.-A., Paniello R., Telouk P., Gillet P. (2010) Volatilization induced impacts recorded in Zn isotope composition of ureilites. Chem. Geol. 276, 374–379. Moynier F., Paniello R.C., Gounelle M., Albarède F., Beck P., Podosek F., Zanda B. (2011) Nature of volatile depletion and genetic relationships in enstatite chondrite and aubrites inferred from Zn isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 297-307. 26 Moynier F., Vance D., Fujii T., Savage P. (2017) The isotope geochemistry of Zinc and Copper. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 82, 543-600. Nakamura T. (2005) Post-hydration thermal metamorphism of carbonaceous chondrites. Journal of Min. and Petr. Sci. 100, 260-272. Nakamura T. (2006a) Yamato 793321 CM chondrite: dehydrated regolith material of a hydrous asteroid. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 242, 26–38. Nakamura T., R. Okazaki, Huss G.R. (2006b) Thermal metamorphism of CM carbanaceous chondrites: effects on phyllosilicate mineralogy and presolar grain abundances. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. (A#1633). Nakato A., Brearley A.J., Nakamura T., Noguchi T., Ahn I., Lee J.I., Matsuoka M., Sasaki S. (2013) PCA 02012: a unique thermally metamorphosed carbonaceous chondrite. Lunar Planet. Sci. 44, A2708. O'Neill H.S.C. and Palme H. (1998) Composition of the silicate Earth: implications for accretion and core formation. In The Earth's Mantle: Structure, Composition and Evolution – The Ringwood Volume (ed. I. Jackson), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. O'Neill H.S.C. and Palme H. (2008) Collisional erosion and the non-chondritic composition of the terrestrial planets. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 4205-4238. Palme H. and O'Neill H.S.C. (2014) Cosmochemical estimates of mantle composition. Chapter 3.1 in Treatise on Geochemistry, second edition (ed. K.K. Turekian), Elsevier, Oxford, UK. Paniello R., Day J.M.D., Moynier F. (2012a) Zinc isotopic evidence for the origin of the Moon. Nature 490, 376-380. Paniello R., Moynier F., Beck P., Barrat J-A., Podosek F.A., Pichat S. (2012b) Zinc isotopes in HEDs: clues to the format of 4-Vesta, and the unique composition of Pecora Escarpment 82502. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 86, 76-87. Paul R.L., Lipschutz M.E. (1989) Labile trace elements in some antarctic carbonaceous chondrites: antarctic and non-antarctic meteorite comparisons. Z Naturforsch 44a, 979-987. Pringle E.A., Moynier F., Savage P.S., Badro J., Barrat J.-A. (2014) Silicon isotopes in angrites and volatile loss in planetesimals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (48), DOI: 10.1073. 27 Pringle E.A., Moynier F. (2017) Rubidium isotopic composition of the Earth, meteorite, and the Moon: Evidence for the origin of volatile loss during planetary accretion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 473, 62–70. Rubin A.E., Trigo-Rodgríguez J.M., Huber H., Wasson J.T. (2007) Progressive aqueous alteration of CM carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 2361-2382. Schaefer L. and Fegley Jr. B. (2010a) Volatile element chemistry during metamorphism of ordinary chondritic material and some of its implications for the composition of asteroids. Icarus 205, 483-496. Schaefer L. and Fegley Jr. B. (2010b) Chemistry of atmsospheres formed during accretion and the Earth and other terrestrial planets. Icarus 208, 438-448. Schrader D.L., Connolly H.C., Lauretta D.S., Zega D.L., Davidson J., Domanik K.J. (2015) The formation and alteration of the Renazzo-like carbonaceous chondrites III: toward understanding the genesis of ferromagnesian chondrules. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 50, 15-50. Schrader D. L., Franchi I. A., Connolly H. C. Jr., Greenwood R. C., Lauretta D. S. and Gibson J. M. (2011) The formation and alteration of the Renazzo-like carbonaceous chondrites I: implications of bulk-oxygen isotopic composition. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 308-325. Shu F. H., Shang H., Lee T. (1996) Towards an astrophysical theory of chondrites. Science 271, 1545–1552. Tharaud M., Gardoll S., Khelifi O., Benedetti M.F., Sivry Y. (2015) uFREASI: user-Friendly Elemental dAta procesSIing. A free and easy-to-use tool for elemental data treatment. Microchemical Journal 121, 32-40. Tonui E.K., Zolensky M.E., Lipschutz M.E., Wang M.-S., Nakamura T. (2003) Yamato 86029: aqueously altered and thermally metamorphosed CI-like chondrite with unusual texture. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 38, 269-292. Tonui E.K., Zolensky M.E., Hiroi T., Nakamura T., Lipschutz M.E., Wang M.-S., Okudaira K. (2014) Petrographic, chemical and spectroscopic evidence for thermal metamorphism in carbonaceous chondrites I: CI and CM chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 126, 284- 306. 28 Trieloff M., Jessberger E.K., Herrwerth I., Hopp J., Fiéni C., Ghélis M., Bourot-Denise M., Pellas M. (2003) Structure and thermal history of the H-chondrite parent asteroid revealed by thermochronometry. Nature 422, 502-506. Van Schmus W.R. and Wood J.A. (1967) A chemical-petrologic classification for the chondritic meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 747–765. Wang M.-S. and Lipschutz M.E. (1998) Thermally metamorphosed carbonaceous chondrites from data for thermally mobile trace elements. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 33, 1297- 1302. Wasson J.T. and Chou C-L. (1974) Fractionation of moderately volatile elements in ordinary chondrites. Meteoritics 9, 69-84. Weisberg M.K. and Huber H. (2007) The GRO 95577 CR1 chondrite and hydration of the CR parent body. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 42, 1495-1503. Weisberg M.K., McCoy T.J., Krot A.N. (2006) Systematics and evaluation of meteorite classification. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II (ed. Lauretta D.S., McSween (Jr.) H.Y). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 19-52. Weisberg M.K., Smith C., Benedix G., Folco L., Righter K., Zipfel J., Yamaguchi A., Chennaoui Aoudjehane H. (2008) The meteoritical bulletin, no. 94, September 2008. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 43, 1551-1588. Wood J.A. and Pellas P. (1991) What heated the meteorite planets? In The Sun in Time (ed. Sonett C.P. et al.) University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 740-760. Xiao X. and Lipschutz M.E. (1992) Labile trace elements in carbonaceous chondrites: a survey. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 10199-10211. Yin Q-Z. (2005) From dust to planets: The tale told by moderately volatile elements. In Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk, ASP Conference Series (eds. Krot A.N. et al.) ASP Conference Series 341, 632-644. Young E., Nagahara H., Mysen B.O., Audet D.M. (1998) Non-Rayleigh oxygen isotope fractionation by mineral evaporation: Theory and experiments in the system SiO2. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 3109-3116. Zolensky M.E., Hewins R.H., Mittlefehldt D.W., Lindstrom M. M., Xiao X., Lipschutz M. E. (1992) Mineralogy, petrology, and geochemistry of carbonaceous chondrite clasts in the LEW 85300 polymict eucrite. Meteoritics 27, 596-604. 29 Zolensky M.E., Mittlefehldt D.W., Lipschutz M.E., Wang M-S., Clayton R.N., Mayeda T.K., Grady M.M., Pillinger C., Barber D. (1997) CM chondrites exhibit the complete petrologic range from type 2 to 1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61, 5099-5115. 30 Figure Captions Figure 1: δ66Zn as a function of water content for CM chondrites (water content from Garenne et al., 2014). Errors for all samples are two times the standard deviation (2σ). Solid black line indicates average CM δ66Zn value (~0.38‰, Moynier et al., 2017). Scale for δ66Zn is logarithmic to ease viewing (note that this affects relative size of error bars). Zinc isotopes display nominally average values down to 3.6 wt% H2O, below which samples PCA 02010 and PCA 02012 display a δ66Zn signal heavily enriched in the heavy isotopes, suggesting evaporative processes and preferential loss of isotopically light Zn to the gas phase. Figure 2: (a-e) M/Zn plots for volatile elements in CM chondrites. Data in open and black symbols are from this study; data in grey are from literature (Paul and Lipschutz, 1989; Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992; Zolensky et al., 1992, 1997; Wang and Lipschutz, 1998). Normalized concentrations on the y-axis are denoted by the element symbol at top left; normalized Zn concentrations are on the x-axis for all plots. All data have been normalized using local maxima (see Section 4.1). The largest slope (Tl) indicates that the element is the most volatile compared to Zn (and vice versa), and a slope of unity is the relative volatility of Zn. Note that for Pb and Sn, only data from this study were available and thus input into calculation. Figure 2f displays the slopes for elements in CM chondrites as a function of their y-intercepts. Figure 3: (a-e) M/Zn plots for volatile elements in CR chondrites. Data in open and black symbols are from this study. Normalized concentrations on the y-axis are denoted by the element symbol at top left; normalized Zn concentration is on the x-axis for all plots. All data have been normalized using local maxima (see Section 4.1). The largest slope (In) indicates that the element is the most volatile compared to Zn (and vice versa), and a slope of unity is the relative volatility of Zn. Note that the CR1 GRO 95577 contains the highest concentrations for all elements investigated, and thus has a strong influence on determination of the relative volatility of the elements. Figure 3f displays the slopes for elements in CR chondrites as a function of their y-intercepts. Figure 4: Normalized abundance data for volatile elements in the CM chondrites as a function of water content (Garenne et al., 2014). Data in open and black symbols are from this study; data in 31 grey are from literature - ALH 81002 data from Xia and Lipschutz (1992); Murchison data from Zolensky et al. (1992); Y 791198 data from Wang and Lipschutz (1998). Elements are ordered in the legend from least volatile to most, with T50 from Lodders (2003) in parentheses for comparison. The volatile element abundances display nominally average values until a threshold content of around 5.5 wt% H2O, below which significant depletions in all elements occur. This severe depletion is interpreted as loss of the elements via volatilization. The high water contents and relatively low volatile element abundance of ALH 83100 is possibly due to its abnormally high carbonate abundance (Zolensky et al., 1997), which may be depleted in volatiles relative to the phyllosilicates. Figure 5: Three isotope plot of δ68Zn versus δ66Zn for all samples analyzed in the current study. Diamonds are CM chondrites; circles are CR chondrites. Errors for all samples are two times the standard deviation (2σ); due to scaling, errors for PCA 02010, PCA 02012 and GRO 03116 are within the symbol. For visibility, inlayed subplot displays data with case-normative δ68Zn versus δ66Zn values, which are all effectively contained at the bottom left corner. Dashed black line indicates the calculated slope of mass-dependent isotopic fractionation (m = 1.99). The CM chondrites PCA 02010 PCA 02012, and the CR chondrite GRO 03116, are intensely enriched in the heavy isotopes of Zn and are thus distinctly separated from the other samples along the line of mass-dependent fractionation. 32 Table 1 – Water content and Zn isotopic signature of CM-like (above partition) and CR/CV (below partition) chondrites by MC-ICPMS Samplea Typeb δ68Zn δ66Zn 2σ 2σ n 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 13.9 6.9 12.9 9.6 5.5 8.2 9.8 9.9 8.2 12.4 10.4 10.6 11.8 5.50 11.0 11.1 5.5 1.1 1.7 8.7 3.6 - - - 0.0 1.2 12.3 3.1 1.4 1.5 CM1/2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM1 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 C2-ung CR2 CR2 CR2 CR1 CR2 CR2 CV3 Weatheringb H2O (wt%)c Be Ae Ae B Be A/B BE Be B B B Be Be B B Be A B B BE A/B B/Ce B B/C B A/B B B/C ALH 83100 ALH 84033 ALH 84044 DOM 03183 EET 87522 EET 96029 LAP 03718 LEW 85311 LEW 85312 LEW 87022 LEW 90500 LON 94101 MAC 88100 MIL 05152d MCY 05230 MET 01070 MIL 07700 PCA 02010 PCA 02012 QUE 97990 EET 83355 BUC 10933 GRA 06100 GRO 03116 GRO 95577 LAP 02342d MET 00426 RBT 04133 a Samples in italics are those identified as heated by: Alexander et al. (2012) for CMs, Abreu (2011) for GRA 06100 and GRO 03116, Davidson et al. (2014) for RBT 04133. b Petrologic type and weather grade from Meteoritical Bulletin (www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php). c Water loss in the 200-770ºC range determined by Garenne et al. (2014). This temperature range was chosen as it represents the dehydration of oxy-hydroxide minerals and hydroxyl groups from phyllosilicates, and excludes adsorbed water as well as de-carbonization and sulfate release. d Calculated stoichiometrically from H contents (Alexander et al., 2012) and a 1/8 mass ratio of H to O in water. 0.32 0.43 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.45 0.34 0.30 0.31 5.42 16.73 0.34 0.36 0.26 -1.02 4.77 0.33 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.71 0.80 0.59 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.62 0.60 0.69 0.66 0.61 0.63 0.60 0.83 0.65 0.59 0.59 10.69 33.30 0.70 0.77 0.46 -2.14 9.30 0.59 0.12 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.10 0.05 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.03 0.12 0.10 0.06 0.15 0.04 0.08 0.17 0.09 0.12 0.06 1.30 0.20 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.13 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.44 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 33 2σ 0.10 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.44 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 n 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - - Zn (ppm) 127 171 155 144 161 158 1 12 85 80 63 43 203 39 44 78 106 (101)e 315 180 100 726 σ 14 19 17 17 18 18 0.3 1 9 9 9 6 23 4 7 9 13 Pb (ppm) 0.92 1.25 1.22 1.31 1.18 1.04 0.06 0.17 0.63 0.64 7.58 0.17 1.68 0.27 0.42 0.58 1.49 (1.51)e 2.50 1.6 - - - 727 σ 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 2.93 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.14 H2O (wt%)b 13.9 6.9 8.2 10.6 5.5c 5.5 1.1 1.7 3.6 - - - 0.00 1.2 12.3 3.1c 0.36 1.5 ~ 20h ~ 9h < 9h Table 2 – Water content, δ66Zn, and HR-ICPMS data for CM-like (above partition) and CR/CV (below partition) chondrites Samplea ALH 83100 ALH 84033 LEW 85312 LON 94101 MIL 05152 MIL 07700 PCA 02010 PCA 02012 EET 83355 BUC 10933 GRA 06100 GRO 03116 GRO 95577 LAP 02342 MET 00426 RBT 04133 BHVO-2 CIg CMg CRg T50 (K)i a Samples in italics are those identified as heated by: Alexander et al. (2012) for CMs, Abreu (2011) for GRA 06100 and GRO 03116, Davidson et al. (2014) for RBT 04133. b Water loss as reported in Table 1 (Garenne et al., 2014). c Calculated stoichiometrically from H contents (Alexander et al., 2012) and the 1/8 mass ratio of H to O in water. d Mahan et al. (2017). e Values in ( ) from Barrat et al. (2012). f Value in ( ) from Gale et al. (2013). g Average values reported in Fegley and Lodders (1998). h Estimates reported in Garenne et al. (2014) and references therein. i Reported values in Lodders (2003). In (ppb) σ 29 3 6 37 6 33 36 9 7 39 4 33 0 6 6 0 6 15 6 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 48 4 5 - - - - - - 14 4 - - - - - - 80 50 30 536 Sn (ppm) 0.45 0.64 0.60 0.69 0.66 0.56 0.00 0.10 0.29 0.30 - - - - - - 0.69 0.12 - - - 0.27 2.19 (1.7)f 1.70 0.790 0.730 704 σ 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 - - - - - - 0.02 0.01 - - - 0.01 0.01 Tl (ppb) 50 70 72 78 69 53 0 0 43 34 - - - - - - 74 18 - - - 32 - - - 142 92 60 532 σ 7 14 15 21 18 11 5 5 15 14 - - - - - - 16 11 - - - 11 - - - Bi (ppb) 28 38 39 42 38 28 1 2 14 17 - - - - - - 64 6 - - - 20 - - - 110 71 40 746 σ 5 9 10 14 11 7 5 5 10 9 - - - - - - 11 7 - - - 8 - - - δ66Zn 0.32 0.43 0.35 0.32 0.45 0.31 5.42 16.73 0.36 0.26 -1.02 4.77 0.33 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.32d 34 Table 3 – Trace element concentrations from literature used in this study Source Paul and Lipschutz 1989 Xiao and Lipschutz, 1992 Samplea Y 82042 ALH A81002 Typeb CM1/2 CM2 ALH 84039 CM2 ALH 83100 CM1/2 Y 793321 CM2 MAC 88100 CM2 Murchison CM2 Cold Bokkeveld CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 CM2 C2-ungrouped 85 75 85 70 92 83 90 93 84 49 82 80 6 a Samples in italics are those identified as heated in their respective source studies (and references therein). b Petrologic type and weather grade from Meteoritical Bulletin (where available). Weatheringb - - - Ae A/B Be - - - Be - - - - - - B - - - - - - - - - - - - Zn (ppm) Tl (ppb) Bi (ppb) 196 183 193 132 166 160 164 209 166 98 162 230 32 68 62 83 53 72 68 73 78 51 43 75 59 11 LEW 90500 A 881655 Y 791198 Y 793321 Y 86789 Zolensky et al., 1992 Zolensky et al., 1997 Wang and Lipschutz 1998 In (ppb) 48 47 52 43 38 50 42 48 47 29 55 44 12 35 Table 4 – Volatility sequences for CM (and CR) carbonaceous chondrites Source This study Type CM CR Increasing volatility (cid:2)(cid:1) Pb, Sn, Bi, In, Zn, Tl Tl, Zn, Sn, Pb, Bi, In Zn, In, Bi, Tl Bi, Pb, Zn, Sn, In, Tl Matza & Lipschutz (1977) Lodders (2003) CM CM 36 100.00 10.00 PCA 02012 PCA 02010 ) ‰ ( n Z 6 6 δ Figure 1 1.00 0.10 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Water content (wt%, 200-770(cid:1)) 37 Figure 2 1 Pb XPb = 0.93(0.07) • XZn a b = + 0.05(0.06) R² = 0.96 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Sn 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 e c n a d n u b a b P e c n a d n u b a n S e c n a d n u b a i B In XIn = 0.99(0.07) • XZn b = + 0.02(0.05) R² = 0.91 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Tl d 1 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 e c n a d n u b a n I e c n a d n u b a l T 0.8 1 Pb f 0.06 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 e p o l s CM gradient Tl In Sn Bi y = -1.09x + 0.99 R² = 0.50 0.6 -0.04 0.01 y-intercept XSn = 0.94(0.08) • XZn b = + 0.02(0.06) R² = 0.95 b 1 0 0 0.2 XTl = 1.01(0.09) • XZn e b = + 0.01(0.07) R² = 0.88 0.4 0.6 Zn abundance 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Bi XBi = 0.99(0.08) • XZn b = - 0.01(0.06) R² = 0.88 c 0.4 0.6 Zn abundance 0.8 1 38 0 0 0.2 Figure 3 1 0.8 Tl e c n a d n u b a l T e c n a d n u b a n S e c n a d n u b a b P 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 XTl = 0.93(0.05) • XZn b = + 0.08(0.03) R² = 1.00 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Sn a 1 XSn = 1.01(0.08) • XZn b = + 0.00(0.05) R² = 0.99 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 b 1 0 0 Pb e p o l s 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 e c n a d n u b a i B e c n a d n u b a n I 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Bi XBi = 1.14(0.06) • XZn b = - 0.15(0.04) R² = 1.00 d 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 In XIn = 1.14(0.08) • XZn b = - 0.15(0.05) R² = 1.00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Zn abundance CR gradient In Bi Pb Sn e 1 Tl f 0.1 XPb = 1.04(0.09) • XZn b = - 0.04(0.04) R² = 0.98 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Zn abundance 0.8 c 1 39 y = -0.93x + 1.00 R² = 1.00 -0.2 -0.1 0 y-intercept 0 0 1 3 8 H L A 14 16 Figure 4 1.4 1.2 ) d e z i l a m r o n ( s M C n i e c n a d n u b a t n e m e l e e l i t a l o V 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 8 9 1 1 9 7 Y n o s i h c r u M 1 0 1 4 9 N O L 2 0 0 1 8 H L A 3 3 0 4 8 H L A 2 1 3 5 8 W E L 2 5 1 5 0 L I M 0 0 7 7 0 L I M Pb (727 K) Sn (704 K) Bi (746 K) In (536 K) Zn (726 K) Tl (532 K) 5 5 3 3 8 T E E 2 1 0 2 0 A C P 0 1 0 2 0 A C P 0 0 2 6 4 12 Water content (wt%, 200-770(cid:1)) 10 8 40 Figure 5 60 ) ‰ ( n Z 8 6 δ 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 PCA 02012 PCA 02010 GRO 03116 5 10 δ66Zn (‰) y = 1.99x - 0.01 R² = 0.99997 15 20 41
1207.3101	1	1207	2012-07-12T21:11:47	Post-Impact Thermal Evolution of Porous Planetesimals	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Impacts between planetesimals have largely been ruled out as a heat source in the early Solar System, by calculations that show them to be an inefficient heat source and unlikely to cause global heating. However, the long-term, localized thermal effects of impacts on planetesimals have never been fully quantified. Here, we simulate a range of impact scenarios between planetesimals to determine the post-impact thermal histories of the parent bodies, and hence the importance of impact heating in the thermal evolution of planetesimals. We find on a local scale that heating material to petrologic type 6 is achievable for a range of impact velocities and initial porosities, and impact melting is possible in porous material at a velocity of > 4 km/s. Burial of heated impactor material beneath the impact crater is common, insulating that material and allowing the parent body to retain the heat for extended periods (~ millions of years). Cooling rates at 773 K are typically 1 - 1000 K/Ma, matching a wide range of measurements of metallographic cooling rates from chondritic materials. While the heating presented here is localized to the impact site, multiple impacts over the lifetime of a parent body are likely to have occurred. Moreover, as most meteorite samples are on the centimeter to meter scale, the localized effects of impact heating cannot be ignored.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Post-Impact Thermal Evolution of Porous Planetesimals Thomas M. Davison1, Fred J. Ciesla1 and Gareth S. Collins2 1Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 2Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK Corresponding author email address: [email protected] (T.M. Davison) 1 ABSTRACT Impacts between planetesimals have largely been ruled out as a heat source in the early Solar System, by calculations that show them to be an inefficient heat source and unlikely to cause global heating. However, the long-term, localized thermal effects of impacts on planetesimals have never been fully quantified. Here, we simulate a range of impact scenarios between planetesimals to determine the post-impact thermal histories of the parent bodies, and hence the importance of impact heating in the thermal evolution of planetesimals. We find on a local scale that heating material to petrologic type 6 is achievable for a range of impact velocities and initial porosities, and impact melting is possible in porous material at a velocity of > 4 km/s. Burial of heated impactor material beneath the impact crater is common, insulating that material and allowing the parent body to retain the heat for extended periods (~ millions of years). Cooling rates at 773 K are typically 1 - 1000 K/Ma, matching a wide range of measurements of metallographic cooling rates from chondritic materials. While the heating presented here is localized to the impact site, multiple impacts over the lifetime of a parent body are likely to have occurred. Moreover, as most meteorite samples are on the centimeter to meter scale, the localized effects of impact heating cannot be ignored. 2 1. INTRODUCTION Impacts between asteroid-sized bodies have been common occurrences throughout the history of the Solar System and have played a role in shaping the chemical and mineralogical properties of these objects throughout their lifetimes. Impact melt in meteoritic materials is widespread (e.g. Bischoff et al. 2006; Weirich et al. 2010) demonstrating that high temperatures can be reached in such events. These melts are thought to result from collisions into the meteorite parent body, at velocities of kilometers per second. In addition to melting, shock metamorphism has been recognized in meteorites (Stöffler et al. 1991; Sharp and de Carli 2006), again providing evidence of the collateral effects that collisions have on the chemistry and mineralogy of minerals in a given parent body. The importance of such collisions in the early evolution of the solar system is debated. On one hand, impacts that led to the impact melt seen in meteorites would have been much more common and energetic during the epoch of planet formation than they are today. Not only was the number of small bodies much greater in the first 100 Ma of our Solar System’s formation, but also gravitational stirring by growing and fully formed planets and their precursors would have dynamically excited planetesimals. For example, in the terrestrial planet region, impact velocities would range from 1-10 km/s (Bottke et al. 2005). This has led some to postulate that such collisions could be responsible for at least some of the early metamorphism and melting seen in meteoritic materials (Wasson et al. 1987; Rubin 1995; Keil et al. 1997; Rubin et al. 2001). On the other hand, a number of workers have shown that much of the thermal metamorphism and melting in primitive bodies can be explained solely by the decay of short-lived radionuclides, such as 26Al (McSween et al. 2002; Hevey and Sanders 2006; Grimm and McSween 1989; Trieloff et al. 2003; Ghosh et al. 2006; Kleine et al. 2008; Harrison and Grimm 2010). Specifically, these models have tracked the rate of heat produced by the decay of the short-lived radionuclides, its redistribution in the parent body, and its loss to space at the surface. The peak temperatures and cooling rates reached by different portions of the modeled parent bodies are consistent with those inferred from the degree of metamorphism and metallographic cooling rates recorded by different meteoritic samples, although Harrison and Grimm (2010) were unable to match data for some chondrites with radiogenic heating alone. To date, no similar study has been carried out to investigate the type of thermal evolution expected as a result of impacts. The most relevant study to date is that of Keil et al. (1997). These authors examined terrestrial impact craters and carried out numerical simulations of the collision of asteroid-sized bodies to evaluate the importance of heating in such events. As the amount of melt and metamorphosed rock around a terrestrial impact crater is small compared to the volume of the crater, and because numerical models showed that impacts would not cause a globally averaged temperature increase in 3 a planetesimal of more than 10 - 100 K, Keil et al. (1997) concluded that impacts were not important sources of the heat needed to explain the metamorphic and igneous processes recorded by meteorites. While Keil et al. (1997) ruled out impacts as being an important source of heating on the global scale, impacts may still be important in producing local thermal effects. Recent studies have quantified some of the thermal effects of large-scale collisions (Asphaug et al. 2006; 2010), such as igneous alteration, degassing, petrogenesis and (possible) melting in so called ‘hit-and-run’ collisions between that occurred differentiated Moon to Mars sized planetary bodies. Davison et al. (2010) quantified the amount of heating and melting produced in collisions at velocities of kilometers per second between planetesimals of the type expected in the early solar system and showed that localized heating is possible. However, little work has been done to investigate the long-term thermal effects of collisions between planetesimals (i.e. for millions of years after the collision). The extent of the thermal anomalies produced in collisions of the type studied in Davison et al. (2010) depends on the porosity of the bodies involved, as the energy of a collision can be locally concentrated by the work required to close pore space (Zel’Dovich and Raizer, 1967). While Keil et al. (1997) discussed porosity they only considered its effects on the disruption threshold of the parent body, and not on its shock physics implications. Such effects must be accounted for, as planetesimals were likely highly porous after their formation. While it is unclear exactly how planetesimals formed in the early solar system, it must have been a gentle process such that the dust grains or aggregates from which they formed collided at relatively low velocities, either by continuous aggregation (Weidenschilling 1980; 1984; 1997), gravitational contraction in a clump due to the streaming instability (Johansen et al. 2007; 2009) or turbulent concentration (Cuzzi et al. 2001; 2008; 2010). In the case of aggregational growth, collisions must have occurred at low enough velocities to allow net growth. In the case of gravitational clumping, the relative velocities of colliding particles must be small enough for them to remain gravitationally bound. At the collisional velocities expected, Teiser and Wurm (2009) have shown that aggregates would be highly porous (> 60%), and Cuzzi et al. (2008) even referred to the planetesimals that would form from gravitational clumps as “sandpiles”. More recently, Bland et al. (2011) used the observed fabric of minerals in the matrix of a chondritic meteorite to infer the porosity of the primitive matrix material. They noted a preferred orientation of grains in the matrix, most easily explained by reorientation of a random grain distribution in a single, unidirectional compaction event. The observed degree of grain rotation was used to quantify the amount of volume lost during compaction (~50%) and conclude that the precursor material must have had a much higher initial matrix porosity (70 - 80%), relative to the ~40% pore space now present in the meteorite matrix. Porosity can have significant effects on the outcome of a collision, as much of the impact energy is consumed in the process of collapsing pore space. First, the presence of 4 porosity can reduce the size of the crater formed in a collision when compared to an impact into a non-porous target (e.g. Love et al., 1993; Wünnemann et al., 2006). Second, the extra energy required to close pore space means that the shock wave created in the collision is attenuated more rapidly, and this a smaller volume will be subject to high shock pressure. However, a third competing effect of porosity is that, to produce the same post shock temperature, a lower shock pressure is required in a porous material compared to a non-porous material. The study of Davison et al. (2010) investigated the interplay of the last two of these effects, to determine the influence of porosity on heating in collisions between planetesimals, and showed that while heating on the global scale was unlikely from all but the most energetic of collisions, on the local scale (i.e. ~ the scale of the impact crater), the presence of porosity could greatly increase the peak temperatures and mass of material heated by a collision. That study also showed that the impact velocity required to heat material to a given temperature is lower for porous material: for example, in a collision between two equal-sized, non-porous planetesimals, a velocity of ~ 12 km/s was required to heat the total mass to the solidus, whereas in bodies of 50% porosity, this was achieved at ~ 7 km/s. Here we perform numerical simulations to quantify, in detail, the global and local processing that would have occurred as a result of an impact on a young planetesimal during the early evolution of our solar system. The iSALE shock physics code allows us to account for changes in porosity and temperature of the colliding materials during the collision event. We then take the resulting physical and thermal structure of the surviving planetesimal and track the redistribution of the energy within the planetesimal and its loss to space at the surface, as is done in the thermal studies of short-lived radionuclides. This provides quantitative information concerning the extent and level of thermal evolution that would be caused in a planetesimal as a result of impact. We then compare the predictions of our models to data reported in the literature on the thermal evolution of meteoritic materials. In the next section we describe the hydrocode simulations we performed as part of this study. We then present the subsequent thermal evolution of the surviving bodies in these collisions. We end with a discussion of our results and the implications for the role of impacts in the thermal evolution of planetesimals in the early solar system. 2. IMPACT MODELING 2.1. Methods In this study, we model the collision between two planetesimals using the iSALE shock physics code (Wünnemann et al. 2006), which is an extension of the SALE hydrocode (Amsden et al. 1980). To simulate impact processes in solid materials several modifications were made to the original SALE code, including: the addition of an elasto- plastic constitutive model, fragmentation models and various equations of state (EoS), 5 and the ability of the code to model multiple materials (Melosh et al. 1992; Ivanov et al. 1997). Development of the code is ongoing: recent improvements include a modified strength model (Collins et al. 2004) and a porosity compaction model (Wünnemann et al. 2006; Collins et al. 2011a). iSALE has been extensively validated against laboratory experiments and other hydrocodes (e.g. Pierazzo et al. 2008). It has previously been used to simulate collisions between porous planetesimals (Davison et al. 2010). The simulations in this work differ slightly from those used in Davison et al. (2010). In that work, the aim of the simulations was to determine the mass of material shock heated to several post-shock temperatures. Lagrangian tracer particles were used to track the pressure history of the material. To determine the mass of material shock heated to a certain post-shock temperature, the peak-shock pressures of the tracer particles could be examined early in the simulation – once the shock wave had been fully released. By summing the masses of the tracer particles shocked to a given critical pressure, the mass of material that would reach a given post-shock temperature could be easily determined. It was therefore not necessary to run the models past the cycle of shock and release. In this work, we are concerned with the longer-term thermal evolution of the heated material, and hence we must simulate a longer time period after the collision. This allows us to determine the final position of the heated material and quantify the compaction throughout the parent body and the ejection of heated material; to achieve this, it is necessary to simulate the self-gravity of the colliding planetesimals. The gravity field in the simulations presented in this work was updated periodically during the calculation using a self-gravity algorithm (Collins et al. 2011b), based on that described by Barnes and Hut (1986). During a gravity field update the gravitational attraction of computational cells containing mass (actually rings of mass due to the axial symmetry employed in the two-dimensional iSALE model) is calculated for each vertex of the mesh. Computational efficiency is achieved with minimal loss of accuracy by combining cells into patches of 2x2, 4x4, 8x8, etc. neighboring cells when they are sufficiently far from the point of interest, and computing the gravitational acceleration of the patch (ring) as a whole. The size of the patch h is determined by a user-defined accuracy parameter, the opening angle θ, times the distance l between the patch center and the vertex at which gravity is being computed, h = θl (Barnes and Hut 1986). Thus, large numbers of cells are combined to form massive patches (rings) when accounting for the gravitational acceleration of mass far from the point of interest. The self-gravity algorithm was tested against benchmark problems discussed in Crawford (2010). The gravity field was updated using this method once every 50 computational cycles in the simulations discussed in this work. The timestep for each computational cycle is adaptive in iSALE, but typically this corresponded to a gravity field update approximately every 2 seconds. 6 2.1.1. Material model An analog material was used to represent the planetesimal material: Dunite, the olivine-rich endmember of peridotite, has previously been used to represent chondritic material (Davison et al. 2010), and is a reasonable approximation for the chemical composition of planetesimals. Dunite also has the benefit of having a well-defined set of input parameters for the ANEOS equation of state package (Benz et al. 1989). An ANEOS equation of state table for dunite was therefore used to represent the thermodynamic response of the non-porous component of the planetesimal material. Material was assigned a shear strength using the procedure outlined in Collins et al. (2004), with strength parameters for weak rock (e.g. Leinhart and Stewart, 2009). Pore- space compaction was simulated with the ε-α porous-compaction model (Wünnemann et al., 2006) including the recent improvements to include the thermal expansion of the matrix during compaction (Collins et al., 2011a). Based on previous studies (e.g. Wünnemann et al. 2008; Davison et al. 2010), the porous-compaction parameter, κ, was set to 0.98. One limitation of the continuum approximation used in the porous-compaction model is that it requires the scale of the pores to be smaller than the scale of the computational cells, and for the pores to be uniformly distributed throughout the material. Therefore, the model assumes that any heating and compaction are averaged over the bulk material. In natural materials, pore space is often heterogeneously distributed; thus heating by shockwaves can lead to localized “hotspots” (Kieffer et al., 1976), on the scale of the pores, which cannot be resolved by this model. 2.1.2. Initial and boundary conditions iSALE was used in its two-dimensional, axi-symmetric mode. Two collision geometries were studied: First, a collision with an impactor-to-parent body radius ratio (Ri/Rpb) of 0.1 (Rpb = 250 km; Ri = 25 km), for which the self-gravity algorithm was employed. Second, a set of simulations were performed with Ri/Rpb = 0.01. In this suite of simulations, only a portion of the parent body proximal to the impact event was modeled (to a depth and radial distance of 150 km), as the shock wave was found not to influence the parent body material beyond that distance from the impact site. As the impact had little effect on the bulk properties of the parent body, the gravity field for these simulations was calculated once at the start of the calculation and not updated. All material was assigned an initial temperature of 300 K, and a constant porosity value (ϕ = 0, 20, 50%). The parent body material was assigned no initial velocity, and all cells within the impactor were assigned a velocity normal to the parent body surface at the point of impact (vi = 4 km/s, 6 km/s). These velocities are comparable to the current relative velocities of the asteroid belt (Bottke et al. 1994), and would easily have been achieved during the early stages of the Solar System (for example, during planet formation, small bodies were scattered to eccentric orbits; as Vimp ~ eVorbit, eccentricities of 0.2 - 0.3 in the asteroid belt would produce such collisional velocities). Only normal 7 incidence collisions were considered in this work, so that the simulations could be run in axial symmetry (to save on computational expense). An investigation into the effect of impact obliquity is in progress; however, Pierazzo and Melosh (2000) showed that melt volume should scale according to the volume of the transient crater. For an impact at 45° (the most common impact angle), the heated mass may be reduced by ~35% from the figures presented here. The boundary condition on the symmetry axis was a free slip condition (i.e. on the boundary there is no normal flow, but material is allowed to move along the boundary), and all other domain boundaries were assigned outflow conditions, where material is allowed to flow freely across the boundary (at which point it is deleted). Impacts would have occurred that spanned a wider range of parameters than those considered here. We focus on this subset in order to document the effects of collisions into porous planetesimals and save a larger parameter exploration for future work. 2.1.3 Resolution In simulations with Rp/Rpb = 0.1, the parent body was modeled with a resolution of 200 computational cells per body radius (i.e. for a 250 km radius parent body, the resolution was ~ 1 km per cell); the resolution of the impactor in the Rp/Rpb = 0.1 simulation was 20 cells per impactor radius. In the simulations with Rp/Rpb = 0.01, the impactor was modeled with a resolution of 20 cells per impactor radius, and the parent body had 2000 cells across its radius. 2.2. Results Figure 1 shows the formation of the impact crater in two simulations. Figure 1(a) shows the initial conditions of an impact between a 25 km radius impactor with a 250 km radius parent body. The initial porosity is ϕ = 0.5, and the impact velocity is 4 km/s. Figure 1(b) shows the opening of a transient crater 500 s after the impact. After 1500 s (Figure 1(c)) the crater starts to collapse due to the gravity of the parent body; the strongly heated impactor material that was lining the crater floor starts to form a plug in the center of the crater floor. A region of compacted, heated parent body material exists beneath the crater floor. Figure 1(d) shows a point in time later in the collapse process, during which time the heated impactor material has formed a hot (~ 1200 – 1400 K) plug of material. After 10000 s (Figure 1(e)), the collapse of the crater is complete, and the heated region has been buried by cooler, less compacted material from the parent body; the heated plug is buried by ~ 12 km of cooler material. The heated, compacted plug of impactor material extends to a radial distance, r, of ~ 20 km, comparable to the radius of the impactor. The parent body material does not reach such high temperatures, but a heated, compacted region extends over a larger radial distance: material at a radial distance of 30 km is heated to 800 K, at r = 40 km to 700 K, and at r = 65 km to 400 K. For a more detailed view of the heated region, see Figure 3(a). Figure 1(f) shows the initial condition for an impact of a 2.5 km radius impactor into the same sized parent body (250 km radius). Figure 1(g) shows the opening of a transient 8 crater. In Figure 1(h), the crater has stopped growing, and the heated impactor material has collected at the center of the crater floor. In this case, a simple impact crater has formed where less gravitational collapse takes place. The modification stage of the impact event is limited to slumping on the walls of the crater (Figure 1(i)). The heated material is buried by this slumped material in Figure 1(j) to a depth of ~ 1 km. The heated plug of impactor material has a radius of 2.3 km. The radial extent of the heated parent body material is: 800 K at r = 3.5 km, 700 K at r = 4.5 km, and 400 K at r = 7.0 km. Final craters of other impact events with velocities of 4 km/s and 6 km/s and porosities of ϕ = 0.0, 0.2 and 0.5 are shown in Figure 2 for the two impact geometries discussed here. In general, the heated regions are larger and the peak temperatures are higher for the faster impact velocity (Figure 2(c–e, h–j). The morphology of the heated region is similar for ϕ = 0.2 (Figure 2(a, d, f, i)) and ϕ = 0.5 (Figure 1(e, j) and Figure 2(c, h)). For impacts with non-porous materials, the peak temperatures are lower and the heated regions are smaller. Also, and critically, less burial of the heated material occurs in the non-porous collisions. For example, in the collision of a 25 km radius impactor at 4 km/s, shown in Figure 2(b), the heated plug is smaller, as less of the heated impactor is retained on the surface. The depth to the bottom of the heated plug is ~ 25 km, and at its widest point, it has a radius of ~ 40 km. Some impactor material at top of the plug appears exposed to the surface: i.e., the burial depth is at the limit of the resolution of the model. The temperatures of the plug of impactor material is ~ 1000 – 1100 K. In the parent body, the radial extent of the heated region is ~ 80 km for material heated to 400 K, ~ 65 km for material heated to 500 K, and ~ 45 km for material heated to 600 K. 3. POST-IMPACT COOLING 3.1. Methods Once the planetesimal had relaxed to its final state, we noted the temperature and density in each cell and imported these values into a separate thermal evolution code to track how the energy was redistributed with time. The code follows the approach used in thermal models that have been used to investigate the effects of short-lived radionuclides, as it solves the heat diffusion equation throughout the surviving planetesimal, with the surface temperature of the planetesimal set by the ambient nebular temperature (170 K). However, there are two major differences between our approach and those adopted in the previous studies. The first is that we do not allow for any heat input from short-lived radionuclides. This is not meant to suggest that such effects are unimportant. Rather the goal here is to quantify the thermal effects due to collisional processes alone. Once the thermal evolution caused by impacts is understood, the combined effects of impacts and 9 ! = short-lived radionuclides can be studied. We leave these combined effects as the subject of future work. The second difference is that because the parent body is no longer spherically symmetric after the impact, we solve the heat diffusion equation in two dimensions using cylindrical coordinates: 1 !T !r !r !T !T " " % % ! ! !t = !z ! ' + $ $ ' !z r !r # # & & where κ is the thermal diffusivity of the materials. The thermal diffusivity is related to other material properties through K "C p where K is the thermal conductivity of the materials of interest, ρ is the density of the material, and Cp is the heat capacity. For each planetesimal, the thermal model uses the same grid construction, and thus spacial resolution, as used in the iSALE simulations. For the thermal properties, we assume a constant heat capacity of 8×106 erg/g. While in reality the heat capacity is a function of temperature and specific make-up of the planetesimal, this value serves as a representative value for solar system silicates and gives a similar thermal evolution to that produced by a temperature dependent expression (Ghosh and McSween, 1999). The density in each grid cell is taken from the iSALE simulations. The thermal diffusivity is taken to be 1×10-3 cm2/s, the same value used by Ghosh et al. (2003). Porous materials are more insulating than solid ones, as thermal conduction can occur only between materials that are in contact. For porous materials, we adopt the scaling based on experiments on lunar rocks and soils of Warren (2011), which argues that the thermal conductivity varies with porosity, ϕ, as: K (!) = K 0e!12.46! This relation gives a thermal diffusivity that then scales as: e!12.46" !(") =!0 (1 !") as the density also decreases by a factor of (1 - ϕ), with ϕ being the fractional porosity of the planetesimal (ϕ = 1 - ρporous/ρnon-porous). In these expressions 0 ≤ ϕ ≤ 1. Planetesimal porosity had been considered in previous thermal models, whether it be via an insulating layer of porous regolith on the surface of a body as was done by Ghosh et al. (2003) or the original structure of the entire body as discussed by Sahijpal et al. (2007). In these cases, the porous material (no value of porosity was given) was assumed to have thermal diffusivities that were 1/100th and 1/1000th of those of the non-porous material respectively. This would correspond to porosities of ~ 0.4 and ~ 0.65 respectively with 10 the functional forms used here, which is at the upper end of the porosities we consider in our work (we consider a maximum of 0.5). To test our model, we calculated the thermal evolution of a perfectly spherical planetesimal that was heated by the decay of 26Al. The thermal evolution of such a body, assuming constant thermal properties, has an analytic solution (Carlslaw and Jäger, 1959) to which our numerical model could be compared. We found very good agreement between our model and the analytic solution—for example, in the case of a 100 km diameter body formed 2 million years after CAIs (thus defining the amount of live 26Al present) and broken up into cells of 1-km side length in both the r and z directions, the temperatures in our model were within 2% of those predicted by the analytic solution. There were no significant differences in the thermal profiles for the r and z directions. We compared a number of cases against the analytic solution and found similar agreement with the analytic solution. We are confident that our thermal model provides an accurate description of how energy is redistributed within the planetesimal. 3.2. Results: Thermal history An example of the detailed thermal evolution of one of the impact simulations is shown in Figure 3, corresponding to the impact scenario shown in Figure 1(a-e; Ri = 25 km, vi = 4 km/s, ϕ = 0.5). Figure 3(a) shows the temperature field immediately after the impact (equivalent to t = 10000 s in Figure 1(e)). ~ 10 km of weakly heated, uncompacted parent body material insulates the more strongly heated and compacted impactor material at this time. After 2 Ma (Figure 3(b)), the hot plug of impactor material remains at > 1350 K (remaining at this temperature for such a prolonged period may lead to some coagulation of molten metal and sulfide). The hot material that is buried loses heat by conduction. The highly porous (uncompacted) material surrounding the compacted and heated zone is a poor conductor and acts as an effective buffer to heat transport. As a result, heat losses from the hot region occur predominantly via conduction toward the surface, through the (more thermally conductive) compacted zone. The hottest region for much of the simulation is the base of the compacted zone, which is surrounded by porous material unaffected by the impact. After 10 Ma, the peak temperature is ~ 1250 K (Figure 3(c)), after 50 Ma, the peak temperature at the center of the heated region is 950 K, and after 100 Ma, the peak temperature is ~ 820 K. An approximately spherical region of radius 20 km is heated above 780 K, and material at a radial distance of 40 km remains heated above 650 K. Material at r = 65 km remains heated to 400 K, or 100 K above the initial temperature, at these late times. Figure 4 shows the thermal evolution of the simulation presented in Figure 1(f-j; Ri = 2.5 km, vi = 4 km/s, ϕ = 0.5). Only approximately 1 km of parent body material covers the strongly heated impactor material at t = 0 Ma, which means that the heated region cools much more rapidly than in the case with Ri = 25 km discussed above. Heat is retained for a short period of time: after 0.2 Ma, the peak temperature has decreased 11 from 1350 K to 1200 K; however, by 1 Ma after the impact, the peak temperature is 900 K and by 4 Ma the peak temperature is 600 K. 3.3. Results: Peak temperatures and cooling rates Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate that the heat deposited by an impact can be retained for extended periods of time, from a few million years to > 100 Ma. These are the same timescales discussed when considering radiogenic heating models. Whether impacts can provide the type of thermal evolution needed to explain the observed features of meteoritic materials requires closer examination. Several types of data are available from the meteoritic record to describe the thermal evolution of a parent body. In this work, we compare results from our thermal models with two of those measurements: the peak temperatures reached by the meteoritic material and the cooling rate of that heated material. The peak temperature is used to define the petrologic type of heated meteoritic material. In this work, we use the definitions of Harrison & Grimm (2010) for type 3 (Tpeak < 948 K), type 4 - 5 (948 K < Tpeak < 1138 K) and type 6 (1138 K < Tpeak < 1273 K). We define type 7 as mass heated above 1273 K, but below the dunite solidus (1373 K; McKenzie and Bickle 1988), and we use 2053 K as the dunite liquidus (Katz et al. 2003). For all the peak temperatures presented in this work, the material remained at that temperature for at least one year. The cooling rate is defined as the rate at which the material was cooled as it passed through a particular temperature during its thermal evolution. Many data have been published on cooling rates of meteorite samples. One such measurement, the metallographic cooling rate (Wood, 1967), is used to infer the cooling rate at 500°C (773 K). Here we summarize some key findings from the literature of typical metallographic cooling rates. Taylor et al. (1987) published a large number of cooling rate measurements for H, L and LL meteorites. Cooling rates ranged from 1 K/Ma to > 1000 K/Ma. Taylor et al. (1987) found no correlation between petrologic type and cooling rate, for each of the three parent bodies that they studied. Harrison and Grimm (2010) summarize cooling rate measurements for the H-chondrite parent body (from Taylor et al. 1987; Willis and Goldstein 1981; Williams et al. 2000), in which they show a range of cooling rates from 2 – 50 K/Ma for type 3 H-chondrites, from 4 – > 1000 K/Ma for type 4 – 5 H-chondrites, and 5 – 75 K/Ma for type 6 H-chondrites, although they excluded various measurements, especially high cooling rates. With this inclusion of those cooling rates, the range of cooling rates may have been even greater. Also, metallographic cooling rate measurements have an uncertainty of a factor of 2.5 (Taylor et al. 1987). Thus, a thermal model that produces cooling rates in the range of 1 – 1000 K/Ma would be consistent with the measurements from the variety of metallographic cooling rate studies listed above. Recent studies of the onion shell structure (e.g. Harrison and Grimm 2010) have attempted to fit thermal models to cooling rate measurements and found in models that best fit observational constraints cooling rates (at 773 K) of ~ 0 – 50 K/Ma. Kleine et al. 12 (2008) modeled 26Al decay to fit measurements from the Hf-W thermal chronometer in H-chondrites, and derived cooling rates from their model. Cooling rates at 773 K were not presented in that work, but at 723 K the cooling rates ranged from ~ 5 – 55 K/Ma. One goal of this work is to determine the range of cooling rates possible in a parent body after being heated in a collision, and to compare this to the observations summarized above. In performing our post-impact thermal evolution, we recorded the peak temperatures reached by each cell of the surviving planetesimal, the mass in each cell, and the cooling rate at 773 K (the temperature recorded by metallographic cooling rates). These data are listed in Tables 1 and 2 and shown in Figures 5 – 9. Table 1 shows, for each simulation, the cooling rate of material from the impactor and parent body (mean and standard deviaton). Table 2 shows, for each simulation, the mass of material heated to each petrologic type, split into the mass from the impactor, and the mass from the original parent body. Heated masses quoted in this section, and in Table 2, are normalized by the impactor mass, Mi, and are for a parent body of radius 250 km. Only material that was retained on the parent body after impact was considered in this analysis. In all cases presented below, less than 0.01% of the parent body mass was ejected from the surface. As heat was conducted to the surface, some material reached a peak temperature higher than its immediate post-impact temperature. Figure 5 shows this increase in temperature for the three simulations with vi = 4 km/s and Ri = 25 km. In the non-porous case, this effect seems to be small: a few grid cells are heated by ~ 200 K after the impact, but the majority of cells see little (< 50 K) or no post-impact heating, as heat is quickly lost to space. In the ϕ = 0.5 case, some material is heated by > 600 K after the impact, and a large number of computational cells are heated by > 100 K, as heat is diffused through the body. For comparison with other models of planetesimal thermal evolution, the mean and standard deviation of the cooling rates for all cells are calculated, to illustrate the typical range of cooling rates predicted by the model. The cooling rates are approximately log- normally distributed, and hence the geometric mean and standard deviation are used. In some cases, the standard deviations presented here are large. It should be noted that these do not represent large errors in the modeling, but rather show that it is possible for a single impact event to produce a wide range of cooling rates in meteorites of a given petrologic type. 3.3.1. Ri = 25 km and vi = 4 km/s Figure 6(f) shows the peak temperatures for the ϕ = 0.5 simulation of a 25 km impactor into a 250 km body (see Figure 1(a-e) and Figure 3). In this simulation, most of the impactor material (~ 0.85 of the impactor mass, Mi) is heated to at least petrologic type 6, with some material (~ 0.12 Mi) heated above the dunite solidus (labeled ‘solid + melt’ on Figure 6). The parent body is not as strongly heated: 0.36 Mi of the parent body material is heated to type 4 - 5, and 0.02 Mi is heated to type 6 or above. The mean 13 cooling rate of the impactor is 1.16 !0.22 +0.27 K/Ma, and for the parent body is 1.00 !0.32 +0.46 K/Ma (Figure 6(c)). Approximately 0.4 Mi of parent body material is ejected during the collision, corresponding to 4×10-6 Mpb. For the same collision geometry with ϕ = 0.2, no material is heated above the solidus, from either the impactor or the parent body. This is expected, as lower porosity leads to lower temperatures in these collisions (Davison et al. 2010). Of the impactor, ~ 0.09 Mi is heated to type 4 – 5, 0.76 Mi is heated to type 6, and ~ 0.01 Mi is heated to type 7. 0.07 Mi is heated to type 3, and the remaining ~ 0.07 Mi is ejected from the parent body during the impact event. Very little of the parent body (< 0.01 Mi) is heated to type 6. ~ 0.15 Mi is heated to type 4 – 5, and the remainder is type 3 or unheated. 1.5 Mi of the parent body (1.5×10-5 Mpb) is ejected from the parent body. The mean cooling rate for both impactor and parent body is faster than for ϕ = 50%: µi = 6.56 !3.93 +9.84 K/Ma and µpb = 5.32 !2.66 +5.31 K/Ma. These cooling rates are greater than for ϕ = 0.5 because of the increase of thermal conductivity with decreasing ϕ. For ϕ = 0, no material is heated to type 7. Of the impactor, < 0.02 Mi is heated to type 6, and ~ 0.45 Mi is heated to type 4 – 5. 0.28 Mi is heated to type 3, and 0.26 Mi is ejected during the collision. The mass of the material heated from the parent body is much less than for ϕ = 0.2 or 0.5, with < 0.04 Mi of material heated to type 4 – 5. The low level of heating in this (no porosity) case is consistent with the results of the Keil et al. (1997) who found minimal amounts of melt in their simulations. More of the parent body is ejected in this collision than in the porous collisions: a mass of 3.5 Mi (3.5×10-5 Mpb) is ejected. The average cooling rate is much higher than for ϕ = 0.2 or 0.5. The median cooling rate is 16.05 K/Ma for the impactor and 17.25 K/Ma for the parent body. However, some material is cooled even more rapidly: The mean rate for the impactor, µi, is 30.01!22.47 +89.32 K/Ma, and for the parent body, µpb = 36.46 !29.85 +164.67 K/Ma. This increase in cooling rate is due to two factors: first, the burial depth is typically less for the non-porous case, with the heated impactor spread out more radially, closer to the surface (compare Figure 2(b) with Figure 2(a) and Figure 1(e)); second, the material that is buried is covered by fully compacted material. The lack of pore space in the insulating layer increases the thermal conductivity, and hence heat can escape from the surface much more easily. Less of the impactor mass is retained on the surface (Mret = 0.74 Mi) compared to the porous collisions: for ϕ = 0.2, Mret = 0.93 Mi and for ϕ =0. 5, Mret = 1.00 Mi. Thus, porosity has several important effects on the thermal evolution of an impacted body. The first two effects are on the dynamics of the collision: High porosity planetesimals prevent much of the heated impactor and parent body material being ejected from the parent body during the collision. The porosity also attenuates the shock wave, resulting in more of the impact energy being concentrated in a region proximal to the impact site. This leads to a third effect, that higher temperatures are reached in highly 14 porous materials than low porosity, as discussed in Davison et al. (2010). The final effect is that the porous rock around the heated material serves to insulate the heated material, slowing its cooling rate and thus keeping materials hot for a longer period of time than in the fully consolidated material that had been used in impact simulations to date. 3.3.2. Ri = 2.5 km and vi = 4 km/s Figure 7 and Tables 1 and 2 show the peak temperatures and cooling rates for the three simulations with Ri = 2.5 km and vi = 4 km/s. Peak temperatures for Ri = 2.5 km are similar to those for Ri = 25 km, with the exception that in the non-porous case, no material is shock heated to type 6 for the smaller impactor. However, the cooling rates for the smaller impactor case are several orders of magnitude higher than for the larger impactor. For example, for ϕ = 0.5, the cooling rate in the impactor is µi = 145.22 !75.19 +155.93 K/Ma and in the parent body, µpb = 167.45!99.52 +245.35 K/Ma, and in the 20% porosity case, µi = 661.23!386.35 +929.36 K/Ma, and µpb = 783.19 !430.75 +957.19 K/Ma. This reflects the fact that the heated material is much closer to the surface of the parent body, and the buried impactor has a thinner insulating layer covering it in the collision with Ri = 2.5 km. In the non-porous collision, very little heated material is buried, and the lack of pore space means that heat is easily conducted in the surface and to impactor are the rates the cooling radiated away: µi = 2.0 ! 10 5 +1.4!10 6 K/Ma, and in the parent body µpb = 4.0 ! 10 5 +3.2!10 6 K/Ma. These "1.7!10 5 "3.6!10 5 results suggest that the very fast cooling H chondrites (with cooling rates of > 1000 K/Ma; e.g. Taylor et al., 1987) may have been heated by impact and emplaced near to the surface of the H chondrite parent body. The trend for less of the impactor to be retained and less of the parent body to be ejected at low porosity is the same for both impactor sizes: In the collision with ϕ = 0.5, all of the impactor is retained on the parent body, and 2.4 impactor masses of parent body material are ejected (2.4×10-8 Mpb). For ϕ = 0.2, 0.07 Mi of the impactor and 4.8 Mi (4.8×10-8 Mpb) of the parent body is ejected, and for ϕ = 0, 0.32 Mi of the impactor and 11.2 Mi (1.1×10-7 Mpb) of the parent body is ejected. 3.3.3. Ri = 25 km and vi = 6 km/s In Figure 8 and Tables 1 and 2, the cooling rates and peak temperatures of the three simulations with Ri = 25 km and vi = 6 km/s are presented. Peak temperatures after a collision at 6 km/s are much higher than in the equivalent collision at 4 km/s. For example, in the ϕ = 0.5 simulation, 0.75 Mi of the impactor is heated above the dunite liquidus (labeled ‘melt’ on Figure 8). In both the ϕ = 0.2 and ϕ = 0 simulations, some material is heated above the solidus; in the equivalent simulations at vi = 4 km/s, peak temperatures are type 7 (ϕ = 0.2) and type 6 (ϕ = 0). 15 Typically, more burial of heated material took place in the faster velocity collisions. This extra burial depth means that the average cooling rates are slower than in the 4 km/s collisions. For example, for ϕ = 0.5, µi = 0.79 !0.32 +0.52 K/Ma and µpb = 0.54!0.18 +0.27 K/Ma, and for ϕ = 0.2 µi = 6.48!4.89 +19.97 K/Ma and µpb = 3.13!1.38 +2.47 K/Ma. For ϕ = 0, cooling rates have a wide range of values for both the impactor and parent body. Two populations of cooling rates exist, with some material cooling rapidly (> 1000 K/Ma) and the majority cooling at 10 – 100 K/Ma. This divide in the cooling rates is likely due to some heated material being exposed at the surface, and hence losing heat much more quickly than the buried, heated material. This is reflected in the large standard deviation in the cooling rates: +817.55 K/Ma and µpb = 70.25!61.16 µi = 121.26 !105.60 +472.94 K/Ma. 3.3.4. Ri = 2.5 km and vi = 6 km/s The final suite of simulations modeled collisions with Ri = 2.5 km and vi = 6 km/s, for each initial planetesimal porosity (ϕ = 0, 0.2, 0.5). Cooling rates and peak temperatures are presented in Figure 9 and Tables 1 and 2. The general trends for slower cooling rates and higher peak temperatures are also seen in these simulations when compared to the equivalent collisions with vi = 4 km/s. In the collision with ϕ = 0.5, the average cooling rates are µi = 47.07!5.40 +6.10 K/Ma and µpb = 48.46 !24.06 +47.77 K/Ma. These slower cooling rates are a consequence of the deeper burial and emplacement of the heated material. Much less heating was observed with ϕ = 0. Heated material is more proximal to the surface than for ϕ = 0.2 or 0.5 (with vi = 6 km/s), so cooling rates are more rapid than in those collisions: µi = 2190.37!1381.02 +3811.67 K/Ma and µpb = 1929.89 !1102.63 +2572.30 K/Ma. Unlike the equivalent collision at vi = 4 km/s, there is some burial of the heated impactor, so the cooling rates are not as high as in that simulation. 3.3.5. vi = 2 km/s Simulations were also run with vi = 2 km/s. However, at this low velocity, little heating occurred (as shown in Davison et al. 2010): No material reached the peak temperature required to define it as a type 4, and in no simulation was more than ~1×10-3 Mi heated to 773 K. Therefore a detailed analysis of the cooling rates and peak temperatures for these simulations was not performed. 4. DISCUSSION The initial porosity of the planetesimal and the relative collision velocity both play a role in determining the peak temperatures and the cooling rates of the impact processed material. Increasing porosity had several complementary effects: First, higher post shock temperatures were possible, due to the impact energy being concentrated in a smaller 16 region because some of it was spent compacting pore space. Second, lower cooling rates were observed because the layer covering the heated material was more thermally insulating, and third, more of the heated impactor material was retained on the parent body rather than ejected during the collision event. Increasing the impact velocity has three major effects: First, higher velocities lead to more heating, due to the increased impact energy. Second, burial of a larger mass of heated material was possible, due to the formation of a larger impact crater that collapsed more dramatically under gravity, forming a thicker insulating layer. This deeper burial of material led to the third effect: lower cooling rates, due to heat being less able to escape through the thick insulating layer. The retention of impactor material on the parent body during the collision is important to the heat budget, as the impactor material and a comparable mass of parent body material, being exposed to the greatest shock compression, is the most strongly heated material. Typically, cooling rates in the impactor and parent body were of a similar magnitude as the cooling rates were largely controlled by the depth of the burial of heated material. In certain cases, impact melt was produced, which is consistent with recent findings that impact melt is widespread in meteoritic material (Bischoff et al. 2006; Weirich et al. 2010). This melting affected the impactor more than the parent body, although small amounts of parent body material were melted. Wasson et al. (1980) and Choi et al (1995) suggested that the IAB iron meteorites may have formed from localized impact melt pools on a parent body. However, Benedix et al. (2000) argued that as impact heating was likely to be inefficient (Keil et al, 1997) another mechanism was required to heat the parent body prior to fragmentation by impact. Our results are compatible with the creation of isolated pools of impact melt, which suggests that it may be possible to form some IAB irons by impact processes. Cooling rates of ~ 1 – 10 K/Ma are required for the IAB irons (Winfield et al., 2012), which is consistent with many of the cooling rates observed in our model. Further study of impacts involving iron is required to fully understand the complex formation of the IAB meteorites. Of the 12 simulations described above, 10 have mean cooling rates in the range 1 - 1000 K/Ma, which match the observations from Taylor et al. (1987), Willis and Goldstein (1981) and Williams et al. (2000). Of the two simulations that have mean cooling rates that fall outside that range (Ri = 2.5 km, ϕ = 0, vi = 4 km/s and 6 km/s), the simulation with vi = 6 km/s does have cooling rates within one σ of the mean that lie between 1 - 1000 K/Ma. Moreover, the iSALE simulations do not account for the dilatancy of the planetesimal material. Therefore, any porosity increase that would have been caused by shear in the collapsing debris lens is neglected; if porosity was introduced to the debris lens in the non-porous simulations, the insulating effect of this lens would be greater, and cooling rates may be slower. Accounting for dilation in iSALE (e.g. Collins et al. 2011b) will allow this process to be investigated in a future study. We conclude 17 that in many different impact scenarios for a range of impact velocities, porosities and impactor sizes, it is possible for material heated by a single impact event to cool at a rate consistent with measurements from a wide range of meteoritic samples. A simulation was run with a smaller parent body (Rpb = 50 km), with an impactor to parent body radius ratio of 0.1 (i.e. Ri = 5 km), and a velocity, vi = 4 km/s. Cooling rates were higher than for the equivalent collisions with Rpb = 250 km: for ϕ = 0, the mean cooling rate was µ = 2222.35!499.93 +645.03 K/Ma, for ϕ = 0.2, µ = 285.84!219.90 +953.29 K/Ma, and for ϕ = 0.5, µ = 11.42 !8.28 +30.15 K/Ma. While these cooling rates represent a significant increase from the cooling rates on the larger parent body, the cooling rates on the small porous parent body still fits within the range seen from chondritic materials. As smaller bodies are likely to support a larger porosity (as their internal pressures would have been lower), this result does not change our conclusions. An investigation into thermal histories on a range of parent body sizes and structures will be discussed in future work. To test the sensitivity of the model to the thermal parameters used, an additional thermal evolution simulation was run for the case of Ri = 25 km and vi = 4 km/s with a different value for thermal diffusivity – the value of κ = 7×10-3 cm2/ was selected as an end member of the range of values that have been employed in other studies. This value was derived from the thermal conductivity used by Opeil et al. (2010), the heat capacity from Ghosh et al. (1999), and the density used in our model. The same output from the iSALE simulation was used in this simulation as was used for the simulation with κ = 1×10-3 cm2/s. There was negligible change in the peak temperatures of the material from both the impactor and the parent body. However, the material that was heated above 773 K cooled more rapidly than in the simulation presented above (Table 1). For the impactor, µi = 45.94!26.91 +64.99 K/Ma and for the parent body, µpb = 36.98!16.72 +30.52 K/Ma. Both of these means represent an increase of a factor of ~ 7, corresponding to the change in thermal diffusivity. While this increase in cooling rates is not negligible, it is less than an order of magnitude change, and the cooling rates are still within the measured values for H chondrites (Taylor et al., 1987; Willis and Goldstein, 1981; Williams et al., 2000). More work is required to more precisely constrain the thermal diffusivity appropriate for Solar System materials. While Keil et al (1997) and Davison et al. (2010) rule out global heating by impacts (i.e. significantly increasing the globally averaged temperature of the parent body) as a heat source, the simulations presented here show that individual impact events could produce materials that match both the types of peak temperatures recorded in meteoritical samples, and the cooling rates in those samples. As most meteorite samples that have been studied are on the centimeter to meter scale, there is no requirement for a heat source to globally heat a parent body and produce the peak temperatures and cooling rates seen in the sample. Moreover, recent N-body simulations (Bottke et al. 2005; O’Brien et al. 2006), semi-analytic modeling (Chambers 2006) and Monte Carlo simulations (Davison et al. 2011) suggest that multiple impacts on a parent body would 18 have been likely in the first 100 Ma. Several studies of the onion shell model have concluded that to fit all measurements of peak temperatures, cooling rates and closure times, a process which perturbs the structure of the parent body is required (e.g. Harrison and Grimm 2010; Taylor et al. 1987; Scott et al. 2010; 2011), with the most likely candidate being impacts. Multiple non-disruptive impacts on the surface of a parent body could not only disturb the onion shell model in the outermost layers of the parent body but also provide an extra heat source to that processed material. This could reduce the depth that those studies required material to have been excavated from, as the impact could increase the petrologic type of the locally disturbed material. Rubin (2004) studied 210 ordinary chondrites with petrologic types 4 – 6 and shock stages S1 and S2, and concluded that all equilibrated OCs were shocked to shock stages S3 – S6. Many ordinary chondrites retained that high shocked state (and received no further thermal processing). For those that are observed today with shock stages lower than S3, it was proposed that post-shock annealing processes returned them to S1 (with further shock events required to reach S2). It was speculated in that study that burial of impact heated porous rocks could have led to such annealing processes. Other groups of meteorites also exhibit evidence of being shock heated and annealed (e.g. Rubin, 1992; Rubin 2006; Rubin and Wasson 2011). The impact scenarios presented in this work show quantitatively that collisions could both heat and bury material such that it would remain hot for millions of years after the impact event. Whether annealing actually occurred as required by the scenario outlined by Rubin (2004) requires further study. However, it is clear that the thermal energy of the impact can be retained for timescales of millions to hundreds of millions of years, allowing for the possibility of significant parent body processing. Given the temperatures and timescales, it is possible that impacts could have led to the mobilization of volatiles on the parent body or aqueous activity through the localized melting of ice, resulting in a pool of warm water that could react with the rock in the planetesimal. These issues will be investigated in future work. Yang et al. (2011) presented several effects of shock on iron meteorites, for example the loss of the cloudy zone microstructure, grain boundary diffusion, and localized diffusion of Ni at the kamacite/taenite boundary; all these microscopic effects most likely took place by low temperature shock heating, similar to that discussed in this paper. However, as the results in this work exclusively used dunite as a material, further modeling of impacts on bodies containing iron are required to extend these results to apply to the meteorites studied by Yang et al. (2011), and test their hypothesis. 5. CONCLUSIONS We have modeled the process of impact heating on a spatial scale of 0.1 to 1 km and the subsequent post-impact thermal evolution of a porous body struck by an impactor a relatively low velocities. These simulations show that impacts can heat chondritic material to temperatures that would produce a range of petrologic types; from type 3 19 through to impact melt. The heated material subsequently cooled at rates consistent with measurements made from meteoritic samples (i.e. ~ 1 – 1000 K/Ma at 773 K). A thorough examination of impact heating coupled with heating from radiogenic decay of 26Al is now required, to fully quantify the interplay between those two heat sources and the effects of the thermal evolution of the chondritic parent bodies. Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge the major contributions of Jay Melosh, Boris Ivanov, Kai Wünnemann and Dirk Elbeshausen to the development of iSALE, and Laurence Billingham for his contribution to the self-gravity algorithm. We thank Gregory Herzog, Ed Scott, Alan Rubin and an anonymous reviewer, whose comments improved this paper. TMD and FJC were funded by NASA PGG grant NNX09AG13G. GSC was supported by NERC grant NE/E013589/1 and STFC grant ST/G002452/1. 20 REFERENCES Amsden A. A, Ruppel H. M, and Hirt C. W. 1980. SALE: A Simplified ALE computer program for fluid flow at all speeds. Los Alamos National Laboratories Report LA- 8095:101p. Asphaug E., Agnor C. B, and Williams Q. 2006. Hit-and-run planetary collisions. Nature 439:155-160. Asphaug E. 2010. Similar-sized collisions and the diversity of planets. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 70(3):199-219. Barnes J. and Hut P. 1986. A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm. Nature 324(4):446-449. Benedix G. K., McCoy T. J., Keil K., and Love S. G. 2000. A petrologic study of the IAB iron meteorites: Constraints on the formation of the IAB-Winonaite parent body. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 35(6):1127-1141. Benz W., Cameron A. G. W., and Melosh H. J. 1989. The origin of the Moon and the single-impact hypothesis III. Icarus 81:113-131. Bland P.A., Howard L. E., Prior D. J., Wheeler J., Hough R. M., and Dyl K. 2011. Earliest rock fabric formed in the Solar System preserved in a chondrule rim. Nature Geoscience 4(4):244-247. Bischoff A., Scott E. R. D., Metzler K., and Goodrich C. A. 2006. Nature and Origins of Meteoritic Breccias. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II, ed. D. S. Lauretta and H. Y. Jr. McSween, 679-712. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Bottke, W. F., Durda D. D., Nesvorný D., Jedicke R., Morbidelli A., Vokrouhlický D., and Levison H. F. 2005. Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion. Icarus 179(1):63-94. Bottke, W. F., Nolan M. C., Greenberg R, and Kolvoord R. A. 1994. Velocity distributions among colliding asteroids. Icarus 107:255-268. Carslaw H. S. and Jäger J. C. 1959. Conduction of heat in solids. 2nd edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Chambers J. 2006. A semi-analytic model for oligarchic growth. Icarus 180(2):496-513. Choi B., Ouyang X., and Wasson J. T. 1995. Classification and origin of IAB and IIICD iron meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59(3):593-612. 21 Collins G. S., Melosh H. J., and Ivanov B. A. 2004. Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 39:217-231. Collins G. S., Melosh H. J., and Wünnemann K. 2011a. Improvements to the ɛ-α porous compaction model for simulating impacts into high-porosity solar system objects. International Journal of Impact Engineering 38(6):434-439. Collins G. S., Davison T. M., and Ciesla F. J. 2011b. Numerical simulations of sub- catastrophic porous planetesimal collisions. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XLII Abstracts, #1933. Collins G. S., Melosh, H. J., Wilson, C. R. and Wünnemann, K. 2011c. Numerical simulations of crater formation with dilatancy. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, Abstract P34A-07. Crawford D. A. 2010. Parallel N-Body Gravitational Interaction in CTH for Planetary Defense and Large Impact Simulations. Proceedings of the 11th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium, #155. Cuzzi J. N., Hogan R. C., Paque J. M., and Dobrovolskis A. R. 2001. Size-selective Concentration of Chondrules and Other Small Particles in Protoplanetary Nebula Turbulence. The Astrophysical Journal 546(1):496. Cuzzi J. N., Hogan R. C., and Bottke W. F. 2010. Towards initial mass functions for asteroids and Kuiper Belt Objects. Icarus 208(2):518-538. Cuzzi J. N., Hogan R. C., and Shariff K. 2008. Toward Planetesimals: Dense Chondrule Clumps in the Protoplanetary Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal 687:1432-1447. Davison T. M., Collins G. S., Ciesla F. J., and O’Brien D. P. 2011. The Energy Budget of Planetesimal Collisions: A Quantitative Analysis. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XLII Abstracts, #2530. Davison T. M., Collins G. S., and Ciesla F. J. 2010. Numerical modelling of heating in porous planetesimal collisions. Icarus 208:468-481. Ghosh A., Weidenschilling S. J., McSween, H. Y., and Rubin A. E. 2006. Asteroidal heating and thermal stratification of the Asteroid Belt. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II, ed. D. S. Lauretta and H. Y. Jr. McSween, 555-566. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Ghosh A. and McSween H. Y. 1999. Temperature dependence of specific heat capacity and its effect on asteroid thermal models. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 34(1):121-127. Ghosh A., Weidenschilling S. J., and McSween H. Y. 2003. Importance of the accretion process in asteroid thermal evolution: 6 Hebe as an example. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 38(5):711-724. 22 Grimm R. E. and McSween H. Y. 1989. Water and the thermal evolution of carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies. Icarus 82(2):244-280. Harrison K. P. and Grimm R. E. 2010. Thermal constraints on the early history of the H- reconsidered. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta chondrite parent body 74(18):5410-5423. Hevey P. J. and Sanders I. S. 2006. A model for planetesimal meltdown by 26Al and its implications for meteorite parent bodies. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 41:95- 106. Ivanov B. A., Deniem D., and Neukum G. 1997. Implementation of dynamic strength models into 2D hydrocodes: Applications for atmospheric breakup and impact cratering. International Journal of Impact Engineering 20:411-430. Johansen A., Oishi J. S., Mac Low M.-M., Klahr H., Henning T., and Youdin A.. 2007. circumstellar disks. Nature Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent 448(7157):1022-5. Johansen A., Youdin A., and Mac Low M.-M.. 2009. Particle Clumping and Planetesimal Formation Depend Strongly on Metallicity. The Astrophysical Journal 704(2):L75- L79. Katz R. F., Spiegelman M., and Langmuir C. H. 2003. A new parameterization of hydrous mantle melting. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4:1073. Keil K., Stöffler D., Love S. G., and Scott E. R. D. 1997. Constraints on the role of impact heating and melting in asteroids. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 32:349- 363. Kieffer S. W., Phakey P. P., and Christie J. M. 1976. Shock processes in porous quartzite: Transmission electron microscope observations and theory. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 59:41-93. Kleine T., Touboul M., Vanorman J., Bourdon B., Maden C., Mezger K., and Halliday A. 2008. Hf–W thermochronometry: Closure temperature and constraints on the accretion and cooling history of the H chondrite parent body. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 270(1-2):106-118. Leinhardt Z. M. and Stewart S. T. 2009. Full numerical simulations of catastrophic small body collisions. Icarus 199:542-559. Love S. G., Hörz F., and Brownlee D. E. 1993. Target Porosity Effects in Impact Cratering and Collisional Disruption. Icarus 105:216-224. McKenzie D. and Bickle M. J. 1988. The Volume and Composition of Melt Generated by Extension of the Lithosphere. Journal of Petrology 29, Part 1:625-679. 23 Melosh H. J., Ryan E. V., and Asphaug E. 1992. Dynamic Fragmentation in Impacts: Hydrocode Simulation of Laboratory Impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research 97:14,735–14,759. O’Brien D. P., Morbidelli A. and Levison H. F. 2006. Terrestrial planet formation with strong dynamical friction. Icarus 184:39-58. Opeil C. P., Consolmagno G. J., and Britt D. T. 2010. The thermal conductivity of meteorites: New measurements and analysis. Icarus 208(1):449-454. Pierazzo E. and Melosh H. J. 2000. Melt Production in Oblique Impacts. Icarus 145(1):252-261. Pierazzo E., Artemieva N., Asphaug E., Baldwin E. C., Cazamias J., Coker R., Collins G. S., Crawford D. A., Davison T. M., Elbeshausen D., Holsapple K. A., Housen K. R., Korycansky D. G., and Wünnemann K. 2008. Validation of numerical codes for impact and explosion cratering: Impacts on strengthless and metal targets. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 43:1917-1938. Rubin A. E., Ulff-Møller F., Wasson J. T., and Carlson W. D. 2001. The Portales Valley meteorite breccia: evidence for impact-induced melting and metamorphism of an ordinary chondrite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65:323-342. Rubin A. E. 1992. A shock-metamorphic model for silicate darkening and compositionally variable plagioclase in CK and ordinary chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56:1705-1714. Rubin A. E. 1995. Petrological evidence for collisional heating of chondritic asteroids. Icarus 113:156-167. Rubin A. E. 2004. Postshock annealing and postannealing shock in equilibrated ordinary chondrites: Implications for the thermal and shock histories of chondritic asteroids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68(3):673-689. Rubin A. E. 2006. Shock, post-shock annealing, and post-annealing shock in ureilites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 41(1):125-133. Rubin A. E. and Wasson J. T. 2011. Shock effects in “EH6” enstatite chondrites and implications for collisional heating of the EH and EL parent asteroids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75(13):3757-3780. Sahijpal S., Soni P., and Gupta G. 2007. Numerical simulations of the differentiation of accreting planetesimals with 26Al and 60Fe as the heat sources. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42(9):1529-1548. 24 Scott E. R. D., Mandell D., Yang J., Goldstein J. I., Krot T., and Taylor G. J. 2010. Metamorphism and impacts on the parent asteroid of H chondrites. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XLI Abstracts #1529. Scott E. R. D., Krot T. V., Goldstein J. I., and Taylor G. J. 2011. Thermal and impact history of H chondrites: was the onion shell structure punctured by impacts during metamorphism? Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement 46:A211. Sharp T. G. and de Carli P. S. 2006. Shock effects in meteorites. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II, ed. D S Lauretta and H. Y. McSween, 653-677. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Stöffler D., Keil K., and Scott E. R. D. 1991. Shock metamorphism of ordinary chondrites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55(12):3845-3867. Taylor G. J., Maggiore P., Scott E. R. D., Rubin A. E., and Keil K. 1987. Original Structures, and Fragmentation and Reassembly Histories of Asteroids  : Evidence from Meteorites. Icarus 69:1-13. Teiser J. and Wurm G. 2009. High-velocity dust collisions: forming planetesimals in a fragmentation cascade with final accretion. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 393(4):1584-1594. Trieloff M., Jessberger E. K., Herrwerth I., Hopp J., Fiéni C., Ghélis M., Bourot-Denise M., and Pellas P. 2003. Structure and thermal history of the H-chondrite parent asteroid revealed by thermochronometry. Nature 422:502–506. Warren P. H. 2011. Ejecta-megaregolith accumulation on planetesimals and large asteroids. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 78(1):53-78. Wasson J. T., Willis J., Wai C. M., and Kracher A. 1980. Origin of iron meteorite groups IAB and IIICD. Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung 35a:781-795. Wasson J. T., Rubin A. E., and Benz W. 1987. Heating of Primitive, Asteroid-Size Bodies by Large Impacts. Meteoritics 22:525-526. Weidenschilling S. J. 1980. Dust to planetesimals: Settling and coagulation in the solar nebula. Icarus 44(1):172-189. Weidenschilling S. J. 1984. Evolution of grains in a turbulent solar nebula. Icarus 60(3):553-567. Weidenschilling S. J. 1997. The Origin of Comets in the Solar Nebula: A Unified Model. Icarus 127(2):290-306. Weirich J. R., Wittmann A., Isachsen C. E., Rumble D., Swindle T. D., and Kring D. A. 2010. The Ar-Ar age and petrology of Miller Range 05029: Evidence for a large 25 impact in the very early solar system. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45(12):1868- 1888. Williams C. V., Keil K., Taylor G. J., and Scott E. R. D. 2000. Cooling rates of equilibrated clasts in ordinary chondrite regolith breccias: Implications for parent body histories. Chemie der Erde 59:287-305. Willis J. and Goldstein J. I. 1981. A revision of metallographic cooling rate curves for chondrites. Proceedings, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 12B:1135-1143. Winfield, T. B., Goldstein, J. I. and Scott, E. R. D. 2012. Cooling rate estimated for IAB and IIICD iron meteorites. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XLIII Abstracts #1307. Wood J. A. 1967. Chondrites: Their metallic minerals, thermal histories, and parent planets. Icarus 6:1-49. Wünnemann K., Collins G. S., and Melosh H. J. 2006. A strain-based porosity model for use in hydrocode simulations of impacts and implications for transient crater growth in porous targets. Icarus 180:514-527. Wünnemann K., Collins G. S., and Osinski G. R. 2008. Numerical modelling of impact melt production in porous rocks. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 269(3-4):529- 538. Yang J., Goldstein J. I., Scott E. R. D., Michael J. R., Kotula P. G., Pham T., and McCoy T. J. 2011. Thermal and impact histories of reheated group IVA, IVB, and ungrouped iron meteorites and their parent asteroids. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 46(9):1227-1252. Zel’Dovich Y. B and Raizer Y. P. 1967. Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena. Dover Publications, Mineola, New York. 26 Table 1: Median and mean cooling rates (at 773 K) for each impact simulation. In all cases presented here, the parent body had an initial radius of 250 km. Median cooling rates were calculated as a mass-weighted median for all cells that are heated above 773 K. Mean cooling rates were calculated as the geometric mean. One simulation was run with a different thermal diffusivity, to test the sensitivity to model parameter. In that case, κ = 7×10-3 cm2/s was used (derived from Opeil et al., 2010; Ghosh et al., 1999). In all other cases, κ = 1×10-3 cm2/s was used (Ghosh et al. 2003). Ri [km] 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Initial conditions κ ×103 [cm2/s] 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 vi [km/s] 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 4 4 4 6 6 6 ϕ 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 Impactor Parent body Cooling rate [K/Ma] Cooling rate [K/Ma] - σpb µpb + σpb - σi µi + σi Median Median 29.85 164.67 36.46 17.25 22.47 89.32 30.01 16.05 2.66 5.31 5.32 4.62 3.93 9.84 6.56 4.90 16.72 36.98 30.52 32.36 26.91 49.94 64.99 34.28 0.32 0.46 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.16 0.27 1.08 61.16 472.94 70.25 27.58 105.60 817.55 121.26 79.55 1.38 2.47 3.13 2.85 4.89 19.97 6.48 3.82 0.18 0.54 0.27 0.52 0.32 0.79 0.52 0.67 3.6×105 3.2×106 4.0×105 3.1×105 1.7×105 1.4×106 2.0×105 8.8×104 430.75 957.19 783.19 596.40 386.35 929.36 661.23 498.40 99.52 167.45 245.35 128.80 75.19 145.22 155.93 130.40 1352.00 2190.37 3811.67 1391.02 1348.40 1929.89 2572.30 1102.63 236.65 476.83 469.82 324.40 138.24 228.83 349.22 308.40 47.60 47.07 6.10 5.40 42.80 48.46 47.77 24.06 27 Table 2: Mass of material originating from the impactor and parent body in each simulation, that has a peak temperature in 6 different petrologic type temperature ranges. The peak temperature of each computational cell is used to define the petrologic type of that mass of material, using the definition of Harrison & Grimm (2010) for type 3 (<948 K), type 4-5 (948-1138 K) and type 6 (1138-1273 K). We define type 7 as mass heated above 1273 K, but below the dunite solidus (1373 K; McKenzie and Bickle, 1988), and we use 2053 K as the dunite liquidus (Katz et al., 2003). Heated mass fractions quoted in this table are defined as: for the impactor, the fraction of the impactor mass heated to a given petrologic type for at least one year, and retained on the parent body; for the parent body, the mass of material heated to the given petrologic type for at least one year and retained on the parent body, normalized by the initial mass of the impactor, Mi. Petrologic Type Temperature Range [K] vi [km/s] ϕ Body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body Impactor Parent body 4 4 4 6 6 6 4 4 4 6 6 6 Ri [km] 25 25 25 25 25 25 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.5 0.0 2.5 0.2 2.5 0.5 2.5 0.0 2.5 0.2 2.5 0.5 3 293 - 948 Complete melting 2053 + Solid + 7 6 4-5 Melt 1373 - 1273 - 1138 - 948 - 2053 1373 1273 1138 Mass of material with peak temperature in range (normalized by impactor mass, Mi) 2.8×10 -1 4.5×10 -1 1.6×10 -2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9×102 3.9×10 -2 1.4×10 -3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8×10 -2 9.2×10 -2 7.6×10 -1 1.3×10 -2 0.0 0.0 9.9×102 1.5×10 -1 4.1×10 -3 7.3×10 -5 0.0 0.0 2.2×10 -2 8.2×10 -2 6.4×10 -2 7.2×10 -1 1.2×10 -1 0.0 9.9×102 3.6×10 -1 2.5×10 -2 7.9×10 -3 8.2×10 -4 0.0 2.1×10 -1 5.3×10 -2 6.8×10 -2 2.2×10 -1 1.0×10 -1 0.0 9.9×102 8.8×10 -2 1.9×10 -2 5.2×10 -3 4.8×10 -2 0.0 9.1×10 -2 2.7×10 -2 4.6×10-2 3.2×10 -2 6.7×10 -1 0.0 9.9×102 5.1×10 -1 1.7×10 -1 4.5×10 -2 1.9×10 -2 0.0 1.7×10 -2 1.3×10 -2 2.0×10 -2 2.1×10 -2 1.8×10 -1 7.6×10 -1 3.8×10 -1 1.6×10 -1 3.1×10 -1 6.2×10 -3 9.9×102 1.2×100 4.7×10 -1 2.1×10 -1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0×106 2.1×10 -2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2×10 -2 9.9×10 -2 7.3×10 -1 2.3×10 -2 0.0 0.0 1.0×106 1.1×10 -1 8.2×10 -3 1.7×10 -4 0.0 0.0 4.2×10 -2 8.9×10 -2 7.9×10 -2 7.3×10 -1 6.0×10 -2 0.0 1.0×106 3.1×10 -1 2.2×10 -2 4.7×10 -3 9.3×10 -5 0.0 1.7×10 -1 5.2×10 -2 3.8×10 -2 1.7×10 -1 9.6×10 -2 0.0 1.0×106 7.3×10 -2 1.0×10 -2 3.0×10 -3 1.6×10 -5 0.0 5.7×10 -2 3.1×10 -2 5.7×10 -2 5.0×10 -2 6.9×10 -1 0.0 1.0×106 5.7×10 -1 1.2×10 -1 6.1×10 -2 3.8×10 -2 0.0 4.8×10 -3 2.2×10 -2 1.2×10 -2 1.4×10 -2 2.2×10 -1 7.2×10 -1 1.0×106 1.5×100 3.0×10 -1 1.2×10-1 2.9×10 -1 4.7×10 -3 28 1650 a) 0 200 ] m k [ z 400 Density [kg/m3] 3500 Temperature [K] 220 1400 Ri = 25 km vi = 4 km/s Rpb = 250 km Ė = 0.5 T0 = 300 K b) 0 t = 500 s c) t = 1500 s d) t = 2750 s e) ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z 200 0 200 0 200 0 200 Density [kg/m3]3500 Temperature [K] 220 1400 Ri = 2.5 km vi = 4 km/s Rpb = 25 km Ė = 0.5 T0 = 300 K 1650 f ) 0 20 ] m k [ z 40 g) 0 t = 100 s h) t = 200 s i) t = 900 s j) 20 0 20 0 20 0 ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z t = 10000 s 200 0 r [km] 200 20 t = 2500 s 20 0 r [km] 20 29 Figure 1: Snapshot at several times during the impact event. Shown here are impacts into a 250 km radius parent body of a 25 km radius impactor (left) and a 2.5 km radius impact (right), with an impact velocity of 4 km/s and an initial porosity of 0.5. Each frame shows a slice through the center of the colliding planetesimals: the left hand side of the frame shows the density structure and the right hand side shows the temperature contours at that time. The final morphology of the crater and thermal anomaly are shown in the final frame. z = 0 is the point of impact. A more detailed view of the heated region from Figure 1(e) can be seen in Figure 3(a). A color version of this figure is available in the online version. 30 Figure 2 Density [kg/m3] 1650 3500 a) 0 Temperature [K] 220 1400 Ė = 0.2 t = 12000 s b) t = 20000 s c) t = 15000 s d) t = 20000 s e) 200 0 200 0 200 0 200 0 Ė = 0.0 Ė = 0.5 Ė = 0.2 Ė = 0.0 ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z ] m k [ z Density [kg/m3]3500 Temperature [K] 1400 220 Ė = 0.2 1650 f ) 0 t = 2000 s g) t = 1000 s h) t = 2800 s i) t = 3700 s j) 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 v i = 4 k m / s v i = 6 k m / s Ė = 0.0 Ė = 0.5 Ė = 0.2 Ė = 0.0 200 200 20 t = 4600 s 20 t = 17500 s 200 0 0 r [km] r [km] Figure 2: Final crater morphologies for each of the models discussed in this paper, except for those presented in Figure 1. The five frames on the left hand side show craters produced by 25 km radius impactors; the five frames on the right hand side show craters produces by 2.5 km radius impactors. Each frame shows a slice through the center of the crater: the left hand side of the frame shows the density structure and the right hand side shows the temperature contours at that time. z = 0 is the point of impact. A color version of this figure is available in the online version. 20 31 300 Temperature [K] 900 1500 b) d) f ) t = 0 Ma t = 10 Ma t = 2 Ma t = 20 Ma a) 60 ] m k [ z 120 180 60 c) ] m k [ z 120 180 60 e) ] m k [ z 120 t = 50 Ma 120 0 t = 100 Ma 120 180 0 60 60 r [km] r [km] Figure 3: Temperature contours through time of the heated region after the impact presented on the left hand side of Figure 1 – i.e. for a 25 km radius impactor colliding with a 250 km radius parent body at 4 km/s, with an initial porosity of 0.5. Times stated are the time after the impact event. 32 300 Temperature [K] 900 1500 b) d) f ) t = 0 Ma t = 0.2 Ma t = 0.1 Ma t = 1 Ma 5 10 15 5 10 15 5 10 15 a) ] m k [ z c) ] m k [ z e) ] m k [ z t = 2 Ma 10 0 0 5 5 r [km] r [km] Figure 4: Temperature contours through time of the heated region after the impact presented on the right hand side of Figure 1 – i.e. for a 2.5 km radius impactor colliding with a 250 km radius parent body at 4 km/s, with an initial porosity of 0.5. Times stated are the time after the impact event. t = 4 Ma 10 33 Figure 5: A comparison of the temperature immediately after the impact event, T(t = 0) and the peak temperature reached after 100 Ma of thermal evolution, Tpeak(t = 100 Ma), for three models with vi = 4 km/s and Ri = 25 km. Each point represents one computational grid cell. Due to the structure of the axisymmetric mesh, each cell does not represent an equal volume. The dotted lines serve as a guide, and represent an increase of 200, 400 and 600 K from the post impact temperature to the peak temperature. Qualitatively, as porosity increases, there is an increase in the number of cells heated post-impact, and in the level of heating achieved in those cells. 34 φ = 0.0 b) Target Impactor a) 0.25 ) i M / M ( s s a M 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 φ = 0.2 c) φ = 0.5 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.00 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] d) 103 Type 3 e) 103 Type 3 f ) 103 Type 3 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S ) i M / M ( s s a M 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] Figure 6: Cooling rates and peak temperatures (after 100 Ma) for collisions between a 25 km radius planetesimal and a 250 km radius planetesimal at 4 km/s, for three porosities (ϕ = 0, 0.2, 0.5). Black bars show the mass from the parent body, and grey bars show the mass from the smaller impacting planetesimal (bars are stacked). Shading behind the peak temperature plots shows which petrologic type the material falls into, based on peak temperature estimates from Harrison & Grimm (2010). Note the differing ordinate scales for the different porosities on the cooling rate plots (a-c). For the cooling rate plots (a-c), bins are logarithmic, with a width of 0.1 in log10; for the peak temperature plots (d-f), the bin width is 25 K. 35 a) 0.09 ) i M / M ( s s a M 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 φ = 0.0 b) 0.7 φ = 0.2 c) 1.2 φ = 0.5 Target Impactor 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.00 10−1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] d) ) i M / M ( s s a M 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 Type 3 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] e) 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 Type 3 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] f ) 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 Type 3 6 e p y T 7 e p y T 5 - 4 e p y T t l e M + d i l o S 400 800 1000 1200 1400 600 Peak Temperature, [K] Figure 7: As in Figure 6, but for collisions at 4 km/s between a 2.5 km radius impactor and a 250 km radius parent body. Peak temperatures are for the first 4 Ma after impact. 36 a) 0.16 ) i M / M ( s s a M 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 φ = 0.0 b) 1.4 φ = 0.2 c) 2.5 φ = 0.5 Target Impactor 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.00 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] 0.0 10−1 104 103 102 101 100 Cooling Rate (at 773 K), [K/Ma] d) 103 Type 3 e) 103 Melt Type 3 f ) 103 Melt Type 3 6 e p y T 7 Solid e + Melt p y T 5 - 4 e p y T 6 e p y T 7 Solid e + Melt p y T 5 - 4 e p y T 6 e p y T 7 Solid e + Melt p y T 5 - 4 e p y T Melt ) i M / M ( s s a M 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 102 101 100 10−1 10−2 10−3 500 2000 1500 1000 Peak Temperature, [K] 2500 500 2000 1500 1000 Peak Temperature, [K] 2500 500 2000 1500 1000 Peak Temperature, [K] 2500 Figure 8: As in Figure 6, but for collisions at 6 km/s between a 25 km radius impactor and a 250 km radius parent body. Peak temperatures are for the first 100 Ma after impact. 37 Figure 9: As in Figure 6, but for collisions at 6 km/s between a 2.5 km radius impactor and a 250 km radius parent body. Peak temperatures are for the first 4 Ma after impact. 38
1104.4806	1	1104	2011-04-25T20:36:24	Emission Lines from the Gas Disk around TW Hydra and the Origin of the Inner Hole	[ "astro-ph.EP", "astro-ph.SR" ]	We compare line emission calculated from theoretical disk models with optical to sub-millimeter wavelength observational data of the gas disk surrounding TW Hya and infer the spatial distribution of mass in the gas disk. The model disk that best matches observations has a gas mass ranging from $\sim10^{-4}-10^{-5}$\ms\ for $0.06{\rm AU} <r<3.5$AU and $\sim 0.06$\ms\ for $ 3.5 {\rm AU} <r<200$AU. We find that the inner dust hole ($r<3.5$AU) in the disk must be depleted of gas by $\sim 1-2$ orders of magnitude compared to the extrapolated surface density distribution of the outer disk. Grain growth alone is therefore not a viable explanation for the dust hole. CO vibrational emission arises within $r\sim 0.5$AU from thermal excitation of gas. [OI] 6300\AA\ and 5577\AA\ forbidden lines and OH mid-infrared emission are mainly due to prompt emission following UV photodissociation of OH and water at $r\lesssim0.1$AU and at $r\sim 4$AU. [NeII] emission is consistent with an origin in X-ray heated neutral gas at $r\lesssim 10$AU, and may not require the presence of a significant EUV ($h\nu>13.6$eV) flux from TW Hya. H$_2$ pure rotational line emission comes primarily from $r\sim 1-30$AU. [OI]63$\mu$m, HCO$^+$ and CO pure rotational lines all arise from the outer disk at $r\sim30-120$AU. We discuss planet formation and photoevaporation as causes for the decrease in surface density of gas and dust inside 4 AU. If a planet is present, our results suggest a planet mass $\sim 4-7$M$_J$ situated at $\sim 3$AU. Using our photoevaporation models and the best surface density profile match to observations, we estimate a current photoevaporative mass loss rate of $4\times10^{-9}$\ms\ yr$^{-1}$ and a remaining disk lifetime of $\sim 5$ million years.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Emission Lines from the Gas Disk around TW Hydra and the Origin of the Inner Hole U.Gorti1,2 D. Hollenbach1 J. Najita3 I. Pascucci4,5 ABSTRACT We compare line emission calculated from theoretical disk models with optical to sub-millimeter wavelength observational data of the gas disk surrounding TW Hya and infer the spatial distribution of mass in the gas disk. The model disk that best matches observations has a gas mass ranging from ∼ 10−4 − 10−5M⊙ for 0.06AU < r < 3.5AU and ∼ 0.06M⊙ for 3.5AU < r < 200AU. We find that the inner dust hole (r < 3.5AU) in the disk must be depleted of gas by ∼ 1 − 2 orders of magnitude compared to the extrapolated surface density distribution of the outer disk. Grain growth alone is therefore not a viable explanation for the dust hole. CO vibrational emission arises [OI] 6300A and 5577A forbidden within r ∼ 0.5AU from thermal excitation of gas. lines and OH mid-infrared emission are mainly due to prompt emission following UV photodissociation of OH and water at r . 0.1AU and at r ∼ 4AU. [NeII] emission is consistent with an origin in X-ray heated neutral gas at r . 10AU, and may not require the presence of a significant EUV (hν > 13.6eV) flux from TW Hya. H2 pure rotational line emission comes primarily from r ∼ 1 − 30AU. [OI]63µm, HCO+ and CO pure rotational lines all arise from the outer disk at r ∼ 30 − 120AU. We discuss planet formation and photoevaporation as causes for the decrease in surface density of gas and dust inside 4 AU. If a planet is present, our results suggest a planet mass ∼ 4 − 7MJ situated at ∼ 3AU. Using our photoevaporation models and the best surface density profile match to observations, we estimate a current photoevaporative mass loss rate of 4 × 10−9M⊙ yr−1 and a remaining disk lifetime of ∼ 5 million years. 1SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 3NOAO, Tucson, AZ 4Space Science Telescope Institute, Baltimore, MD 5Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD -- 2 -- Subject headings: Astrochemistry -- line:formation -- protoplanetary disks -- planet- disk interactions -- stars:individual (TW Hya) 1. Introduction Circumstellar disks are widely believed to go through a transition epoch as they evolve from an initial, gas-rich, classical T Tauri (CTTS) phase to the weak-lined T Tauri (WTTS) debris disk phase (e.g., Strom et al. 1989, Skrutskie et al. 1990, Najita et al. 2007). Transition disks, which typically are a small fraction (∼10-20%) of all disks, are characterized by an outer, optically thick dust disk and an inner dust-depleted region or "hole". However, it is unclear if all disks go through the transition phase (e.g., Currie et al. 2009, Muzerolle et al. 2010). Transition disks are sometimes found to be accreting at rates similar to young disks suggesting that the dust holes are not devoid of gas, but many objects do not show signs of accretion (Sicilia-Aguilar, Henning & Hartmann 2010). The duration of the transition epoch is also uncertain (e.g., Muzerolle et al. 2010), although a recent study of the statistics of spectral energy distributions suggests times of ∼ a few 105 years (Ercolano & Clarke 2010). Studying these partially evacuated disks can potentially provide many insights into how disks evolve and form planets. At least three different scenarios have been proposed to explain the morphology of transition disks (see Najita et al. 2007 for a summary). First, the infrared opacity hole may not be a true depletion of material, but the result of dust evolution. Coagulation and grain growth in disks might lead to the formation of larger, "invisible" solid objects, thereby emptying the inner regions of small, infrared-emitting dust. In this sequence of events, gas and large solids or planetesimals remain and there is no true mass depletion (e.g., Dullemond & Dominik 2005). In a second situation, the hole in the disk is caused by dynamical interactions with an embedded planet (e.g., Skrutskie et al. 1990, Marsh & Mahoney 1992, Takeuchi et al. 1996, Varniere et al. 2006). The Jovian or larger mass planet first creates a gap in the disk and then accretes most of the accretion flow from the outer disk, while a small fraction continues past the planet to accrete onto the star (e.g., Lubow & D'Angelo 2006). The third explanation for the inner hole is photoevaporation, a process by which high energy radiation from the central star heats the gas to escape speeds and creates gaps (and then quickly central holes) a few AU from the star (e.g., Alexander et al. 2006a, 2006b, Gorti, Dullemond & Hollenbach 2009, Owen et al. 2010). Determining which of the above three mechanisms dominate in the creation of the inner opacity hole may be key to deciphering the role played by transition disks in disk evolution, planet formation, and disk dispersal. TW Hya is the closest known (at 51 pc, Mamajek 2005) classical T Tauri star with a nearly face-on (e.g., Qi et al. 2006) transition disk that exhibits an inner hole in its (IR-emitting) dust distribution (Calvet et al. 2002, Ratzka et al. 2007, Hughes et al. 2009). It is a very well-studied object -- the central star and disk have been investigated from the X-ray to centimeter wavelengths. -- 3 -- The X-ray, Far Ultraviolet (FUV; 6eV< hν <13.6eV) and optical flux from the central star are well known (e.g., Kastner et al. 2002, Herczeg et al. 2002, Stelzer & Schmitt 2004, Robrade & Schmidt 2006). The dust1 disk has been studied and extensively modeled, with one of the earliest detailed models being that of Calvet et al. (2002, hereafter C02) who inferred the presence of a dust depleted inner cavity of size ∼ 4AU from the spectral energy distribution. A very small amount of dust persists in the inner hole, and the observed 10µm silicate emission feature has been attributed to this component (C02). Ratzka et al. (2007) also model the dust disk to infer a dust cavity, but with a smaller size, ∼ 0.5 − 0.8 AU. The presence of a dust hole, or at least a significantly dust depleted inner cavity, has been confirmed by imaging and interferometric studies (Eisner et al. 2006, Hughes et al. 2007). The star has a low, but measurable, accretion rate with estimates ranging from 4 × 10−10 M⊙ yr−1 (Muzerolle et al. 2000) to & 10−9 M⊙ yr−1 (Alencar & Batalha 2002, Eisner et al. 2010), indicating the presence of significant gas in the inner dust hole. The nature of the transition disk around TW Hya is uncertain. While a dust hole is clearly present and gas must be present in the hole to account for the observed accretion, the amount of gas in this region is not well determined. A radial velocity planet was reported by Setiawan et al. (2008), but located closer to the star (∼ 0.04AU) than a planet that could cause the 4 AU dust edge. (This detection has been disputed and the radial velocity variations attributed to stellar surface activity, see Huelamo et al. 2008, Figueira et al. 2010.) TW Hya is known to be a strong far ultraviolet (FUV) and X-ray source and observed to have outward flows traced by [NeII]12.8µm emission (Herczeg et al. 2007, Pascucci & Sterzik 2009), which implies that the disk is presently undergoing photoevaporation. However, photoevaporation theory has traditionally predicted a clean evacuated inner region devoid of dust and gas soon after the formation of a hole, which the observed accretion rate onto the central star contraindicates. Owen et al. (2011) argue that the inner disk draining epoch, although short (. 105 years, the local viscous timescale at 1 − 4 AU where the gap opens), may still be observed as an accreting transition disk. Clearly, spectral line observations of gas in the TW Hya disk might distinguish between the above scenarios. In recent years, many detections of gas emission lines from TW Hya have become available. The disk around TW Hya was detected in the pure rotational transitions of CO by Zuckerman et al. (1995), van Zadelhoff et al. (2001) and later by Qi et al. (2004, 2006) who also imaged the disk. Herczeg et al. (2002) detected UV emission from H2 from the disk surface near the star. Emission in the near infrared from vibrationally excited H2 was detected by Bary et al. (2003). Thi et al. (2004) detected sub-millimeter emission from the molecules CO, HCO+, DCO+, CN and HCN. CO rovibrational emission from the disk has been observed (Rettig et al. 2004, Salyk et al. 2007, Pontoppidan et al. 2008). Resolved line emission of [NeII]12.8µm was reported by Herczeg et al. (2007) and Pascucci & Sterzik (2009). Bitner et al. (2008), as part of a ground-based survey using TEXES (Richter et al. 2003), failed to detect pure rotational H2 1We refer to solid particles with sizes smaller .1mm as "dust". Larger solids are ignored as they have too little surface area and are therefore not important for gas physics and topics relevant to this paper. -- 4 -- emission from the disk, although Najita et al. (2010) detected emission with the larger beam of Spitzer. Najita et al. (2010) present a high-quality Spitzer IRS spectrum with numerous emission features of H2, OH, CO2, HCO+, [NeII], [NeIII] and HI. Thi et al. (2010) recently reported the Herschel PACS detection of the [OI]63µm line from TW Hya. In addition to this rich dataset, strong optical emission has been detected from [OI] 6300 A and 5577 A (Alencar & Batalha 2002, S. Edwards, priv. comm.). Pascucci et al. (2011) reanalyze the optical data to also report the detection of emission from [SII] 4069 A and [MgI 4571 A. The abundant observational data available for the TW Hya system make it an excellent target for studying the physical nature of transition disks through theoretical modeling. Gas emission line strengths are very sensitive to the density, temperature and the abundance of the emitting species (e.g., Gorti & Hollenbach 2008). The emission lines observed largely originate from trace species, and in order to interpret the data accurately, detailed models of gas chemistry and emission are needed. In this paper, we use our previous disk models (Gorti & Hollenbach 2004, 2008, Hollenbach & Gorti 2009, hereafter GH04, GH08 and HG09 respectively) to compute gas emission line luminosities from the disk around TW Hya. In §2, we provide a short description of the available data and current understanding in each case. We briefly describe the modeling procedure and then discuss disk models that best match observational data in §3. We consider the implications of our results on the nature of the transition disk around TW Hya (§4), discuss the constraints set on disk mass in §5 and finally present our conclusions in §6. 2. Gas Emission Lines: Observational data We summarize below the observed gas line emission at various wavelengths. For clarity of discussion, we do not present the data in chronological sequence of detection, but instead group observations into three wavelength regions, (i) far-infrared and sub-millimeter features, (ii) the mid- infrared (MIR) features, and, (iii) the optical and near-infared (NIR) features. Table 1 lists the line luminosities for the observed gas emission lines. We do not discuss the dust emission observations, but refer the reader to C02, Eisner et al. (2006), Ratzka et al. (2007) and references therein. Sub-millimeter and far infrared emission: Detection of CO 2-1 pure rotational emission from TW Hya was first reported in the seminal paper on gas disk lifetimes by Zuckerman et al. (1995). Several molecular species (CO, HCN, CN, HCO+, DCO+) have been detected in the TW Hya disk at millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths using single-dish telescopes (van Zadelhoff et al. 2001; van Dishoeck et al. 2003; Thi et al. 2004). Wilner et al. (2003) presented the first spatially resolved observations of the disk in the HCO+ J=1-0 line. This was followed by CO rotational line images in the 2-1, 3-2 and 6-5 transitions using the SMA by Qi et al. (2004, 2006). Thi et al. (2010), using the Herschel Space Observatory, recently reported the detection of the [OI]63µm line and set upper limits on the [OI]145µm and [CII]158µm lines. In conjunction with -- 5 -- 13CO measurements, they interpret the emission line fluxes as indicative of a low gas/dust mass ratio in the disk (∼ 2.6 − 26) and estimate the disk gas and dust masses as (0.5 − 5) × 10−3M⊙ and 1.9 × 10−4M⊙ respectively. Mid-infrared emission: The [NeII]12.8µm forbidden line was first reported by Ratzka et al. (2007) from Spitzer IRS observations along with HI 6-5 and 7-6 emission lines. The [NeII] line was subsequently spectrally resolved using MICHELLE on Gemini N by Herczeg et al. (2007) and they found the line profile to be consistent with a single Gaussian centered at −2 ± 3 km s−1 in the stellocentric frame with an intrinsic FWHM of ∼ 21 km s−1. They concluded that the broad line width could result from turbulence in a warm disk atmosphere, Keplerian rotation of gas located ∼ 0.1 AU from the star, or a photoevaporative flow. These observations were followed by high- resolution spectra using VISIR on Melipal/VLT by Paccucci & Sterzik (2009) and more recently by Pascucci et al. (2011). They found that the [NeII] line profile (intrinsic FWHM ∼ 13km s−1) and the ∼ 4 − 6 kms−1 blueshift with respect to the star are consistent with theoretical predictions of a photoevaporative flow driven by stellar extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) photons (Alexander 2006). The line profile may also be consistent with photoevaporation by X-rays and the production of [NeII] in predominantly neutral, X-ray heated layers (Ercolano & Owen 2010). Najita et al. (2010) recently presented high quality Spitzer IRS spectra of TW Hya in the 10 − 20µm region. The spectra show many emission features including H2 S(1) and S(2) pure rotational lines, many HI lines, [NeII], [NeIII], several transitions of OH and bands of HCO+ and CO2. They find no strong lines from H2O, C2H2, or HCN as seen in other classical T Tauri stars without dust holes (Carr & Najita 2008, Salyk et al. 2008, Pascucci et al. 2009, Pontoppidan et al. 2010). They conclude that the [NeII] emission is consistent with origin in the X-ray heated disk surface. The detected OH emission arises from transitions originating in energy levels as high as 23000 K above ground, and they interpret the emission as likely to arise from photodissociation of water in the disk since this process results in OH in very high rotational states (van Dishoeck & Dalgarno 1984). The relative strengths of the H I emission are found to be consistent with case B recombination in gas possibly associated with the accretion flow close to the star. Near-infrared, optical and UV emission: Emission from molecular hydrogen in excited vi- brational states has been detected from TW Hya. Weintraub et al. (2000) detected emission from H2 in the disk around TW Hya in the 1-0 S(1) line at 2.1218 µm through high-resolution spec- troscopy using CSHELL on NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility. Herczeg et al. (2002) detected H2 UV emission (with FWHM∼ 18km s−1) consistent with excitation caused by UV-induced fluores- cence from a warm surface layer ∼ 2 − 3AU from the central star. Ingleby et al. (2009) identified a feature in the STIS spectra at 1600 A which they attribute to electron impact H2 emission and derive a lower limit on the surface density of gas at ∼ 1 AU to be ∼ 5 × 10−5g cm−2. CO rovibrational emission from hot gas, presumably in the inner (r . 4AU) disk, has also been detected. Rettig et al. (2004) first detected CO from the disk, and concluded that the observed -- 6 -- emission was optically thin and consistent with a CO gas mass of ∼ 6 × 1021 g. The low emission temperature of ∼ 430K was interpreted as due to a clearing of the inner disk out to a radial distance of ∼ 0.5 AU. Salyk et al. (2007) expanded on these results with observations that cover a larger range of rotational energies. They estimate emission radii for the CO gas to be ∼ 0.2 − 1 AU, and derive higher temperatures (∼ 800K) based on their excitation diagram analysis. Pontopiddan et al. (2008) have recently presented velocity-resolved spectroastrometric imaging of the rovibrational lines (4.7µm) using the CRIRES high-resolution infrared spectrometer on the Very Large Telescope (VLT). Keplerian disk models are fit to the spectroastrometric position-velocity curves to derive geometrical parameters of the molecular gas and the CO gas emission from TW Hya is calculated to come from r ∼ 0.1 − 1 AU. Optical lines from atomic oxygen have been detected from TW Hya. Emission from forbidden lines of [OI] at 6300A and 5577A have been observed around many young stars with disks and outflows (e.g., Hartigan et al. 1995). Apart from a high velocity component (HVC, ∆v ∼ 100 − 200km s−1) that is attributed to shocks in the outflows, there is also a low velocity component (LVC, ∆v ∼ 10km s−1) that is believed to originate in the disk or from the base of a slow disk wind. The origin of this line has remained somewhat of a mystery, as physical conditions in disks are such that reproducing the observed high line luminosities is difficult (e.g., Font et al. 2004, Hollenbach & Gorti 2009). The higher excitation [OI]5577 A line often accompanies the LVC, but is never associated with the HVC. The optical forbidden lines often exhibit small blueshifts (typically ∼ −5 ± 2km s−1) (Hartigan et al. 1995). Ercolano & Owen (2010) explain the LVC emission as arising from an X-ray heated, neutral photoevaporative flow that then gives rise to the observed blueshifts. However, the forbidden line emission in TW Hya is not blueshifted and does not appear to participate in a photoevaporating flow (Pascucci et al. 2011). TW Hya has emission lines (only in the low velocity component) at [OI]6300A and 5577A, with line luminosities estimated at 10−5 and 1.4 × 10−6 L⊙ respectively (Alencar & Batalha 2002, Pascucci et al. 2011). Pascucci et al. (2011) obtain an intrinsic FWHM of the [OI] lines as ∼ 10km s−1 and also report [SII] 4069A emission, estimated at 3.6 × 10−6L⊙ and non-detection of the [SII] 6731A line. As we show later, very high gas temperatures or densities are needed to excite the [OI] 5577A line and reproduce the observed ratio of the 6300/5577 lines (Tgas & 30, 000K for ne . 106cm−3, or, Tgas & 4000K for ne & 108 cm−3). Thus it is a challenge for the 5577A emission to arise thermally (however, also see Ercolano & Owen 2010). Here we account for the [OI] emission and line ratio as a result of photodissociation of OH in the disk surface layers (e.g., Storzer & Hollenbach 1998, Acke et al. 2005). 3. Gas Emission Lines: Modeling We use our recently developed theoretical disk models to model the gas emission from the disk around TW Hya. The stellar parameters are reasonably well determined and the dust distribution has been previously modeled, and the focus of this paper is therefore the gas disk modeling. We -- 7 -- vary disk parameters to find the model that best fits the observational data, with the principal variable being the surface density distribution. We find that two disk models with different inner disk masses (for r < 4AU), but with the same outer disk mass (r > 4AU), provide reasonable fits to the data. We describe these disk models in what follows, and discuss in detail the case with the lower inner disk mass as these results are a somewhat better match to the observed line emission. We call this our standard disk model (hereafter referred to as SML, 'L' for low inner disk mass). We also discuss the results from an alternate model with a higher mass in the inner disk and refer to that composite model as SMH. 3.1. Model description and inputs Our theoretical disk models start from a prescribed disk surface density distribution and stellar spectrum and proceed to self-consistently calculate the disk structure from the gas temperature and density distribution. The gas disk models simultaneously solve for the thermal and chemical prop- erties of the gas and vertical hydrostatic equilibrium. Gas and dust temperatures are computed separately and can deviate significantly in the surface layers where most of the line emission origi- nates. The gas radiative transfer follows an escape probability formalism. Dust radiative transfer is done using a modified two-layer approach (e.g., Chiang & Goldreich 1997, Dullemond, Dominik & Natta 2001, Rafikov & DeColle 2006). Our chemistry consists of ∼ 85 species and ∼ 600 reactions, includes photodissociation and photoionization by EUV, FUV and X-rays, and is focused towards accuracy in the disk surface layers. Our standard models do not include freeze-out of species on grain surfaces, but we test for the effects of freeze-out where relevant below. We also assume that H2 forms on grain surfaces in our disk models for all grain temperatures below ∼ 400K (Cazaux & Tielens 2004). For further details, see GH04, GH08 and HG09. Stellar parameters and the incident radiation field are key inputs to our theoretical models, and are reasonably well determined for TW Hya. The source is at a distance of 51 pc (Mamajek 2005) and the disk is almost face-on with a very low inclination angle (7◦ -- outer disk, Qi et al. 2004; 4◦ -- inner disk, Pontoppidan et al. 2008). We adopt M = 0.7M⊙, R=1R⊙ and T = 4200K for the stellar mass, radius, and effective temperature (Webb et al. 1999). We construct a composite spectrum for the star by adding observed X-ray and FUV spectra. We use the FUSE/IUE spectrum from the NASA HEASARC archive (Valenti et al. 2003, Herczeg et al. 2002). The FUV region is split into several energy bins for accurately computing gas opacity as described in GH04. Herczeg et al. (2002) derive a reconstructed Lyman α flux ∼ 30% higher than the observed flux and we use this value for the Lyman α band of our FUV spectrum. The total FUV (6 − 13.6eV) flux is approximately 3 × 1031 erg s−1. The X-ray spectrum is from the XMM-Newton archive (Robrade & Schmitt 2006) and extends from 0.3 − 5keV, and with a total X-ray luminosity of 1.3 × 1030 erg s−1. We extrapolate the observed spectrum to lower and higher energies (0.1 − 10keV) and this results in a total X-ray luminosity of 1.6 × 1030 erg s−1. Although the star might also have an EUV component (13.6 − 100eV), perhaps indicated by the observed photoevaporative flow (Alexander -- 8 -- 2008, Pascucci & Sterzik 2009), its strength can only be crudely estimated by indirect arguments (Alexander et al. 2005) and we do not include this uncertain contribution to the high energy flux. We discuss below, where relevant, the effect on line emission fluxes if an EUV flux were to be added. Figure 1 shows the composite spectrum used as model input and the vertical dashed lines in the figure indicate the neglect of an EUV radiation field. Two different dust disk models have been proposed for TW Hya, by Calvet et al. (2002) and Ratzka et al. (2007). C02 developed detailed models of the TW Hya dust spectral energy distribution (SED) to constrain many aspects of the disk structure, and these models have been validated by subsequent observational studies (e.g., Qi et al. 2004, Eisner et al. 2006, Hughes et al. 2007). The flux deficit at . 20µm and a sharp increase or excess at ∼ 20 − 60µm led them to propose the presence of an inner hole in the disk at r . 4 AU. The deficit is ascribed to a lack of dust in the hole, and the excess arises from direct illumination of the rim of the optically thick dust disk beyond 4 AU. There is also a small mass of dust, 0.5 lunar masses, in the inner cavity which gives rise to the observed spectral feature at 10µm. Ratzka et al. (2007) situate the inner edge of the outer optically thick dust closer to the star at ∼ 0.5 − 0.8 AU. They model both the SED and the 10µm visibilities in detail by including sedimentation in the disk, where the dust is reduced in the upper atmosphere due to settling processes. Our dust models at present do not include settling. We defer gas modeling of the disk using the Ratzka et al. (2007) dust distribution to future work, and keep our dust model relatively uncomplicated at present. We avail ourselves of the dust models of C02. For simplicity, we adopt many features of this dust model, specifically the dust size and spatial distribution in our standard dust model. We consider their favored model with a maximum grain size amax=1cm and disk mass 0.06M⊙, which corresponds to a total dust mass of 7.8 × 10−4M⊙ for their assumed gas/dust ratio. As we ignore dust particles with sizes larger than 1mm which are not very relevant for gas physics, our model disk "dust" (amax = 1mm) mass is reduced accordingly to 2.4 × 10−4M⊙(for a grain size distribution n(a) ∝ a−3.5, where a is the grain size). Our chemical composition of dust for the outer disk is simpler than the detailed models of C02. We use a mixture of silicates and graphite for the optically thick disk, and verify the assumption by the SED fit from the resulting model dust continuum emission. We note the disk structure (especially in the regions where gas emission lines originate) is eventually determined by the gas temperature structure, although the dust distribution is sometimes important for heating and cooling of gas. We use pyroxene grains for the inner dust hole as suggested by C02 to better fit the continuum SED and the 10µm feature. As we show later, the amount of dust present in this inner region is in any case too low to significantly affect the gas thermal balance or chemical calculations. The details of the adopted dust model are listed in Table 2. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can efficiently heat gas via the grain photoelectric heating mechanism (Bakes & Tielens 1994) and gas heating depends on the assumed PAH abun- dance. Disks around low mass stars are believed to be deficient in PAHs by a factor of ∼ 10 − 100 (Geers et al. 2006). We typically scale the PAH abundance with the decrease in cross-sectional area -- 9 -- of the dust per H atom compared to the interstellar value. We adopt a PAH abundance of ≃ 10−7 per H in the ISM (e.g.,Habart et al. 2003). Therefore, the abundance of PAHs in the optically thick disk (r & 4AU) around TW Hya is ≃ 10−9. Such a depleted abundance means that X-ray heating usually dominates FUV-induced PAH heating of gas in the outer disk. The abundance of small grains (a . 0.1µm) in the inner disk (r . 4AU) is either negligible (C02) or very small (Eisner et al. 2006). It is therefore likely that the abundance of very small dust like the PAHs is low in the inner disk. Such low PAH abundances do not influence the heating in the inner disk and the PAH abundance in the inner disk is therefore set to zero. (2010). Hughes et al. We do not consider turbulence in the disk beyond 4 AU and all cooling line widths are thermal in the optically thick outer disk. This assumption is supported at large radii by sub-millimeter observations and modeling of molecular emission from TW Hya by Qi et al. (2006) and Hughes et al. (2010) infer a small turbulent linewidth that is approximately a tenth of the thermal linewidth in the outer disk. The situation may be different in the inner disk, r . 1 − 2AU. Salyk et al. (2007) assume higher turbulent linewidths (vturb ∼ 0.05vK ∼ 4km s−1, where the Keplerian velocity vK ∼ 80km s−1 at 0.1 AU) in their analysis of the rovibrational CO lines from the disk. COrovib emission arises from hot gas, and the thermal speed of CO for ∼ 2000K gas is ∼ 1kms−1. The expected thermal linewidth is therefore ∼ 2km s−1. Observed line widths are typically ∼ 15kms−1 (Salyk et al. 2007), with presumably a large Keplerian contribution for gas located at small radii (∼ 0.1AU) in a face-on disk with a small inclination (4◦, Pontopiddan et al. 2008). We follow Salyk et al. (2007) in assuming vturb = 0.05vK in the inner disk (r < 4AU) regions. We also add viscous heating as a mechanism to heat gas in the inner disk. The dust-depleted inner cavity might still contain dense gas and viscous heating may be an important contributor to heating the dust-poor gas, especially in the shielded interior near the midplane. We follow the prescription given in Glassgold et al. (2004) (Equation 12 of that paper) for the viscous heating term. The viscosity parameter α is unknown, but is set in our models by assuming steady state accretion onto the star at the observed rate of ∼ 10−9 M⊙yr−1 and from the solutions obtained for the density and temperature of the gas. The surface density distribution of gas in the disk is the primary input to our disk models. We begin with the dust distribution of C02 which has a rapid increase in surface density over ∼ 3.5 − 4 AU. We then vary the gas surface density distribution, Σ(r), so that the resulting gas emission lines provide a good match to observational data. The resulting profile for the SML disk is shown in Figure 2. The SML disk has a gas mass ∼ 10−5 M⊙ within 3.5AU, and 0.06M⊙ for 3.5AU < r < 200AU. Although the dust surface density drops by ∼ 103 inward of r ∼ 4AU, the gas surface density drops only by ∼ 100 for the SML disk. The alternate model SMH has a gas mass ∼ 10−4 M⊙ within 3.5AU, and in this case the gas surface density only drops by ∼ 10. The outer disk surface density distribution is the same for both SML and SMH cases. We discuss later in §3.3 how deviations from the models SML and SMH worsen the agreement between model results and observational data. -- 10 -- For descriptive purposes, we divide the disk into three distinct regions, (i) the inner disk (r . 3.5AU), (ii) the mid-disk region (3.5AU. r . 20AU) and the (iii) outer disk (r & 20AU). Our modeling procedure first constrains the gas in the inner disk region, as this gas provides opacity to stellar radiation, shields gas in the partially exposed rim region at 3.5 − 4 AU, and affects the structure of the outer disk. The inner region of the SML disk is not only depleted in dust but also in gas, by & 2 orders of magnitude compared to that expected if the outer optically thick disk was smoothly extrapolated radially inwards. A power law is assumed for the inner disk surface density distribution, Σ(r) ∝ r−1; 0.06AU≤ r < 3.5AU. We place the inner disk edge at 0.06AU, at the location of the magnetospheric truncation radius (Eisner et al. 2006). As there is continued accretion onto the star, presumably by funnels along magnetic field lines, this is a logical choice for this parameter. Between 3.5 − 4 AU, Σ(r) rises sharply and these radii constitute the "rim" region. The functional form for Σ(r) is modeled to fit the appearance of the rim of a photoevaporating disk (Gorti et al. 2009) and is given by log Σ(r) = 18 − exp(11/rAU ) g cm−2; 3.5 < rAU < 4. Here, rAU = r/1AU. The dust disk turns optically thick over this region. Beyond 4AU, the surface density is assumed to follow a self-similar density profile, as expected from a photoevaporating and viscously evolving disk (e.,g., Hughes et al. 2007, Gorti et al. 2009). For r > 4AU, Σ(r) = 500r−0.7 AU exp(−r1.3 AU /100) g cm−2. 3.2. Model Results: Disk Structure We briefly discuss the disk density and temperature structure, the dominant heating and cooling mechanisms at three representative disk radial positions, and then describe the line emission calculated from the disk models. The density and temperature distribution as a function of spatial location in the SML disk is shown in Figure 3. Gas temperatures in the surface regions where emission lines originate are typically ∼ 2000 − 200K in the inner and mid-disk regions, r . 30AU. The near absence of dust in the inner disk and the sudden rise in dust surface density at the rim causes an increase in gas heating and results in a small vertically extended region at this radius ∼ 4AU. However, gas in the inner disk provides opacity that shields the midplane regions at ∼ 4 AU, and there is only a slight "puffing-up" of the inner rim. (We find that for the upper layers of the outer disk where the gas temperature decouples from the dust temperature, the column density of gas to the star at a given angle (height of the rim) changes by less than 10% as the mass of the inner disk changes from 10−5M⊙ to 10−4M⊙.) As seen in Fig. 3 (see AV = 1 surface), the disk structure is overall quite flat, with only modest flaring of the outer disk. Gas at depths where AV ∼ 0.1 − 1 to the star, and at radii r & 50AU, only attains temperatures of ∼ 50 − 200K and the density in these warm layers is low, n ∼ 105−7 cm−3. Disk gas temperature and density is shown as a function of height at typical positions in the three different disk regions, inner disk at r = 0.1AU, mid-disk at r = 6AU, and the outer disk at r = 30AU in Figures 4,5 and 6. -- 11 -- In the inner disk (Fig. 4), heating is mainly by X-rays all through the disk, and in the midplane FUV is significant only via chemical heating (primarily due to photodissociation of water and ionization of carbon). However, to attain the high surface temperatures achieved in this region, FUV photons are essential to photodissociate molecules capable of efficiently cooling the surface gas. The gas temperature increases when H2 photodissociates and molecular (H2O and OH, formed via H2) cooling decreases, and also when CO photodissociates and can no longer cool the gas efficiently. In the inner disk, the transition from C to CO occurs higher up than the transition from H to H2, as is typical in low dust regions (e.g., Glassgold et al. 1997). The inversion in height can be seen in Fig. 4 where the H2 and CO photodissociation fronts are marked. Rovibrational emission of CO (COrovib) dominates the cooling with some additional cooling by H2O and OH, until CO photodissociates. At higher z, OI6300A and Lyman α are the main coolants. Fig. 5 shows the disk vertical structure in the mid-disk at r = 6AU. In these regions where dust is abundant, dust collisions keep gas at the ambient dust temperature in the optically thick midplane region. Near the optically thin surface layer and near the H2 photodissociation front, heat released from the formation of H2 is significant. Chemical heating due to photoreactions (FUV photodissociation of water) and FUV-induced grain photoelectric heating by PAHs is of significance over a limited column (AV ∼ 0.1 − 1). At the surface, X-rays dominate the heating. Cooling is mainly due to CO and H2 in the molecular layer, and OI6300A, [OI]63µm, [NeII] and [ArII] fine structure lines cool the surface gas. The outer disk vertical structure at r = 30AU is shown in Fig. 6. Dust is thermally coupled to the gas by collisions in the midplane where gas and dust temperatures are equal. Near the AV = 1 layer, heating by PAHs, photodissociation reactions and formation and dissociation of H2 are important. X-rays dominate the heating at vertical column densities of . 1022cm−2. FUV photoionization of carbon contributes to the heating (∼ 15%) in the region above the CO photodis- sociation layer. Main coolants in the outer disk are CO in the molecular region and [OI]63µm fine structure emission at the surface. 3.3. Model Results: Line Emission We adopt the following procedure to determine the surface density distribution that is described in §3.1. In order to obtain a gas disk surface density model that best matches observed gas line emission, we first constrain the surface density distribution in the inner disk, i.e. within 4 AU. This is because gas in the inner disk can shield the outer disk regions, affecting the density and temperature structure of the disk beyond 4 AU, where the dust disk is optically thick. There clearly is some gas in the inner hole, based on the observed accretion onto the central star, and on observations of CO rovibrational lines and H2 ultraviolet lines. We discuss these emission line constraints and the undetected water lines below, and their implications for the gas mass in the inner hole. -- 12 -- Gas Opacity Although the dust is optically thin to stellar radiation, the column density of gas may be sufficient to provide significant optical depth in the inner disk. In fact, the gas may be optically thick to its own infrared emission. We use our disk chemical models to obtain chemical abundances for gas in the inner disk and follow Tsuji(1966) in calculating the monochromatic opacity due to each gas species. At the likely pressures and temperatures of our inner disks, H− and H− 2 bound-free and free-free, CO and H2O all can provide significant opacity. H− and H− 2 bound-free and free-free continuum opacity can be significant at wavelengths shorter than about 4 µm, and produce near IR radiation from the inner edge of the disk at ∼ 0.06 AU. The ground state CO vibrational band occurs near 4.7 µm and the blend of CO rovibrational lines provide opacity near 5 µm. Beyond about 6 µm, the blend of pure rotational H2O lines dominate the opacity. Later on in this subsection, we discuss CO and H2O lines in some detail. Here, we make more general arguments based on the expected continuum emission from gas in the disk. We use the opacities from Tsuji (1966) to show that if the surface density of the outer disk is extrapolated inwards to produce a ∼ 10−3 M⊙ inner disk (we call this the "full disk" or the "undepleted disk"), observable emission would result in the wavelength region 5 − 15 µm due to the CO and H2O emission. We find, by a similar analysis, that the H− and H− 2 bound-free and free-free produce excess emission at shorter wavelengths (∼ 2 − 3µm) where the stellar emission is significant. We use the specific opacity (per molecule) for each opacity contributor from Tsuji(1966) and calculate the opacity at each radial annulus by multiplying this with the vertical column density as obtained from our model disk chemical calculations. For illustration, we calculate the flux at one wavelength and compare that with the observed emission. We choose a wavelength of 8µm where the stellar contribution is negligible, there is no contamination from the silicate feature and where there is a significant dip in the continuum emission (see C02). At each radial annulus, the photosphere (at 8µm) is defined to lie at the height (z) above the midplane where the total optical depth at 8µm becomes of order unity. Near the inner edge of the disk for 0.06AU < r . 0.08AU, H− and H− 2 free-free are the main opacity contributors. This opacity drops rapidly with decreasing electron density further out in the disk. At 0.08AU . r . 0.2AU, H2O lines dominate the 8µm opacity. Having defined the photosphere of the disk from the gas opacities, we estimate the 8µm flux from this surface, where the gas temperature ranges from ∼ 300 − 2000K. The disk becomes optically thin to the midplane (λ ∼ 8µm) at ∼ 0.2 − 0.3AU. We obtain an 8µm flux of ∼ 1Jy, a factor of ∼ 4 higher than observed. A full gas disk is therefore incompatible with the spectral energy distribution. The H2O lines at 8µm therefore yield an estimate of the upper limit on gas mass as 2.5 ×10−4 M⊙. We discuss later our model results for H2O line emission and compare them to Spitzer IRS upper limits to the line fluxes to obtain a better limit on the inner disk mass. A similar opacity analysis at a wavelength of 5µm suggests that CO rovibrational emission in excess of what is observed will be produced by a full gas disk. We use our model calculations and compare them with observed rovibrational CO line strengths near 5µm to estimate the actual mass of the inner disk to be ∼ 10−4 − 10−5 M⊙. In what follows, rather than using an opacity argument, we use our disk model results on -- 13 -- emergent line fluxes from the disk surface to infer the disk mass. We describe the emitting regions for each gas emission line diagnostic and also discuss where applicable the constraints set in each case. The outer disk gas is attenuated by the gas in the inner disk as described earlier. We calculate the outer disk structure using the surface density distribution of the inner disk in the SML model and use the same results for the outer disk component of the SMH model as well, as the attenuation columns of the gas provided at 4 AU are similar in both these cases (within ∼10%). As our disk models are computationally intensive, we do not calculate disk models for the outer disk in the SMH case separately. In the rest of the paper, the emission in the mid and outer disk regions refer to that calculated using gas optical depths and absorption columns for the 10−5M⊙ inner disk mass case (SML). Figure 7 shows the radial extent of each of the gas emission lines discussed below. The cumulative line luminosity, L(r), integrated up to the radius r is shown for each emission line and is normalized to the total calculated value (from inner, mid and outer disk regions). Also marked are the 10% and 90% luminosity levels. We quote the corresponding radii below for each emission line and this defines the radial extent of the emission. CO rovibrational emission COrovib emission typically arises from a height in the inner disk where the CO is just beginning to photodissociate. Gas temperatures in the disk generally increase with height and gas temperatures in the emitting layers are high (Tgas & 500K). In dust-poor gas, the CO and H2 photodissociation layers are inverted, as first reported by Glassgold et al. (2004), that is, the carbon becomes CO at larger z than the H becomes H2. We similarly find that the H2 is photodissociated to deeper layers and that CO is co-existent with large columns of atomic hydrogen, creating conditions favorable for exciting COrovib emission (Glassgold et al. 2004). The primary formation route to CO is the oxygenation of atomic carbon (C+OH). In the layers shielded from FUV photodissociation CO is destroyed by collisions with helium ions. CO vibrational lines are an important constraint for setting the gas mass in the inner disk. A high disk mass results in high total CO vibrational emission if the lines are optically thick, as the luminosity in these lines increases with temperature which increases (albeit weakly) with increasing gas mass. The total luminosity of the observed lines (select P and R branch transitions) is constrained by observations to be . 10−5L⊙ (Salyk et al. 2007). We find that inner disk masses of 10−4, 10−5 and 10−6 M⊙ all give total CO luminosities within a factor of ∼ 2 of the observations and are all hence viable choices. The CO emission is found to be mainly a surface effect dominated by hot gas at the surface of the disk, resulting in approximately the same total CO luminosity for all three disk masses. To distinguish between these cases, the line luminosity of each of the CO rovibrational lines needs to be compared with data. We estimate the CO rovibrational line luminosities of the v = 1 − 0 P(J) series as follows. We adopt the analysis of Scoville et al. (1980) and perform an approximate non-LTE calculation for the populations of the CO rovibrational levels. We only consider the v = 0 and v = 1 states as higher vibrational states are unlikely to be significantly occupied at typical disk temperatures. We assume that collisions result in a change in the vibrational state, and vibrational level populations are determined from detailed balance -- 14 -- assuming an "effective" Einstein A-value from v = 0 − 1 as described in Najita et al. (1996). We then assume that the rotational levels within each v state are thermally populated (Scoville et al. 1980). Collisional rates with e−, H and H2 are taken from Najita et al. (1996). Oscillator strengths and transition frequencies are from the compilations of Kirby-Docken & Liu (1978). The optical depth for each transition is calculated as detailed in Hollenbach & McKee (1979) from the column density of CO molecules in a given rovibrational state, and an escape probability formalism is used for line transfer. Salyk et al. (2007) detect 15 transitions covering rovibrational energies Eu/k from 3000K- 6000K, where Eu is the energy of the excited upper level. We also compare our results with earlier CO rovibrational detections by Rettig et al. (2004) in complementary transitions. There was a typographical error in the Rettig et al. (2004) table of line fluxes, and the actual fluxes are a factor of 10 below what has been reported. We also do not include the P(21-25) transitions of that paper, as these data are prone to errors due to photospheric and telluric corrections (Sean Brittain, private communication). We compare our model results with the data in Figure 8. We find that a gas depletion from the full disk of 0.1 − 0.01 corresponding to a gas mass of 10−4 − 10−5M⊙ matches the observed line emission fairly well, with the lower mass inner disk model (SML) being a better fit to the CO data. A factor of 10 lower in mass results in CO emission from warmer gas that produces excess emission at high J levels. All of the CO gas emission comes from r . 0.5AU (due to rapidly decreasing gas temperatures beyond), in agreement with both the analysis of Salyk et al. (2007) and the spectroastrometric imaging study by Pontopiddan et al. (2008). Our gas mass estimate for the SML disk is consistent with the surface density estimate of Salyk et al.(2007) of 1 g cm−2 at r ∼ 1 AU where they used a slab model, although in our models the emission is mainly from hot gas in the disk surface layers. Salyk et al. (2007) also assume a H2/CO conversion ratio of 5000 as observed towards a massive protostar, and caution that their derived mass estimate is likely be a lower limit. In our disk models, the hydrogen is predominantly atomic in the regions where COrovib emission originates (also see Glassgold et al. 2004). We explicitly calculate disk chemical abundances and find that the H/CO ratio in the hot inner disk regions where COvib emission arises is ∼7000. The gas/dust mass ratio in the inner disk is ∼ 500 − 5000 for the dust mass of the Calvet et al. (2002) disk, indicating a relative depletion of the dust with respect to the gas at r . 4AU. H2O rotational emission Our gas opacity analysis above suggests that a full undepleted disk would produce excess H2O rotational emission in lines whose wavelengths range from 6 to 15 µm compared with observations. As we specifically calculate water abundances and the disk density and temperature structure, we can compare the model disk H2O rotational line fluxes to the corresponding upper limits from Spitzer IRS in the 10 − 19µm wavelength region (Najita et al. 2010). No water emission has been detected and line luminosities are therefore expected to be lower than ∼ 10−7L⊙. We find that for the full undepleted inner disk with a mass of 10−3M⊙, many rotational lines in the 10 − 19µm region are above the detection limit. Some of the strongest transitions are 761 − 616, 762 − 615, 854 − 707, 853 − 726 and 844 − 717, all with luminosities in the -- 15 -- range of 1 − 3 × 10−6L⊙, compared with the upper limits set by Spitzer observations of ∼ 10−7L⊙. From the water rotational line emission constraint alone, we can set a limit on the inner disk mass as ∼ 10−4M⊙, at which the water emission is barely detectable. This limit is consistent with the upper limit set by CO emission in the preceding discussion, where we fix the inner disk mass to be in the range 10−4 − 10−5M⊙ based on CO rovibrational emission. H2 fluorescent emission We do not model H2 UV fluorescence but draw on the results of Herczeg et al. (2004) who conduct a very detailed analysis and model the observed emission. Our SML disk corresponds to their thick disk model, and most of the emission in this case arises from the illuminated edge of the disk at r = 0.06AU. Herczeg et al. (2004) estimate a hot (Tgas ∼ 2500K), H2 mass of ∼ 1019g from their analysis. We calculate the mass of H2 gas at these temperatures in our inner disk to be ∼ 3 × 1019g, in reasonable agreement with the Herczeg et al. (2004) results. All of this gas lies very close to the inner edge at ∼ 0.06AU. At this radius the Keplerian speed of the gas from the almost face-on disk (i = 4◦) is about ∼ 7km s−1, the thermal speed is ∼ 4km s−1, bringing the expected FWHM to ∼ 16km s−1 very close to the observed FWHM of 18km s−1 (Herczeg et al. 2002). We note that the inner disk structure near the magnetospheric truncation radius is likely to be quite complicated compared to our simple power law assumption of the surface density, and our comparison with the Herczeg et al. model is only a consistency check. OH lines 16 rotational transitions of OH, mainly in the ground vibrational state, were reported by Najita et al. (2010) from their Spitzer observations. The data indicate high excitation states (Jupper ∼ 15-30), with equivalent energies Eu/k up to 23,000K above ground. OH mid-infrared thermal emission from our model is mainly from the hot, dense (n ∼ 1012 − 1013cm−3, Tgas ∼ 700 − 1000K) gas very close to the central star at r . 0.1AU. These lines are, however, weak in the 10 − 19µm region and below the sensitivity of the Spitzer IRS instrument. OH thermal emission is also produced from gas in the mid-disk and outer disk regions, but this gas is typically at ∼ 300K and incapable of reproducing the observed high excitation lines. As suggested by Najita et al. (2010) for TW Hya, UV photodissociation of water is a possible source of the OH emission (see also Tappe et al. 2008 who suggest this mechanism for HH214). From our disk chemical network solution, we can estimate the total luminosity in the OH lines produced by the photodissociation of water in the disk. We calculate the total OH line luminosity as follows. For simplicity, in this discussion we assume that Lyman α photons (E = 10.2eV) are mainly responsible for the photodissociation of water molecules -- a reasonable assumption because Lyman α contributes to a significant fraction of the total FUV luminosity (e.g., Herczeg et al. 2002, Bergin et al. 2003). Harich et al. (2000) studied the photodissociation of water by Lyman α photons and the photodissociation energy is determined to be 5.1eV. The excess energy for a Lyman α photodissociation is therefore 5.1eV. About 66% of the photodissociations of water result in OH and H, while the remaining 34% result in O and H atoms. Harich et al (2000) further find that most of the OH products are extremely rotationally excited with a peak at a rotational level -- 16 -- J = 45 (Eu/k ∼ 45,000K) and that almost 75% of the available energy goes into pure rotational excitation. This translates to an energy of ∼ 4eV per photodissociation (of H2O to OH) that is then eventually radiated away in a rotational cascade from the high J states (also see Mordaunt et al. 1984, van Harrevelt & van Hemert 2000). We calculate the energy in the rotational cascade in our model disk by counting the total number of water photodissociations by photons with energy equal to or greater than Lyman α that lead to OH and multiplying this by the energy available NP D(H2O) is the rate of the total number of photodissociations of water in for excitation (4eV). If the disk by Lyman α (and more energetic FUV) photons, then the luminosity in the OH cascade LOH,P D is the product 0.66 × NP D(H2O) × 4eV. Equating this to the observed OH luminosity then requires that there are ∼ 1040 photodissociations per second, or that only ∼ 1% of the stellar Lyman α luminosity of 1042 photons s−1 be intercepted by water in the disk (also see Bethell & Bergin 2009). If the solid angle subtended by the disk is ∼ 0.1, the desired Lyman α flux absorption by water is feasible if water abundances are high enough (at the 10% level) to compete with the other dominant sources of opacity such as dust, photoionization ionization of Mg, Fe, and Si, and photodissociation of O2 and OH. Therefore, photodissociation of water can plausibly account for the observed line luminosities. In the above approximate analytic calculation, we simply used the Lyman alpha flux. However, in the model we calculate the OH luminosity due to water photodissociation using photodissociation rates obtained at each spatial grid cell. We use the full FUV spectrum, including Lyman alpha, but only count those photodissociations where the FUV photons are energetic enough to lead to OH in highly excited rotational states as described above. The OH luminosity in the SML disk is 4 × 10−6L⊙, lower than the total luminosity in the observed lines (upper J levels ranging from ∼ 30 to ∼ 15), 6 × 10−6L⊙. We note that the cascade must also produce lines that are not observed in the Spitzer IRS band. The energy of a rotational state ∝ J(J + 1) and the cascade originates at J ∼ 45. The unobserved transitions from J ∼ 45 to J ∼ 30 and J ∼ 15 to J = 0 therefore have a total energy approximately 1.5 times that in the transitions that are observed. The unseen luminosity must account for another ∼ 9 × 10−6L⊙, bringing the "observed" value to 1.5 × 10−5L⊙. Our SML disk results for OH produced by H2O photodissociation are discrepant by a factor of ∼ 4. Of this emission, 30% arises from photodissociation of water in the inner disk and the rest comes from the extended middle and outer disk regions to radii r . 40AU (Fig. 7). In the inner disk, the OH is from the edge of the disk near the star where the number densities are ∼ 1012 − 1013 cm−3 and gas temperatures are ∼ 500 − 1000K. The main formation route to water is H2 + OH and it is destroyed mainly by FUV photodissociation. The water abundance in these regions is however low, with typical vertical column densities . 1015 − 1016 cm−2 in the photodissociation layer. In the mid-disk and outer disk regions, OH emission is dominated by the rim at 4 AU and beyond the rim is primarily produced from regions where the column density to the star ∼ 1 − 5 × 1022 cm−2, densities are 107 − 1010 cm−3 and Tgas ∼ 200 − 600K. In the mid-disk regions OH+H2 is the dominant formation route to water, whereas in the cooler outer disk regions (r & 15AU), H3O+ recombination leads to the formation of water molecules. Water abundances range from X(H2O) ∼ 10−6 to 10−9 in these photodissociation layers, and typical water columns to the star -- 17 -- are ∼ 1016 cm−2. The latter is consistent with our earlier analysis, which suggested that if the water opacity were ∼ 10% of the total opacity at FUV wavelengths, we would obtain OH luminosities close to that observed. A column density of ∼ 1017 cm−2 of water provides optical depth of unity at the FUV wavelengths needed to photodissociate water. If the OH is mainly prompt emission following photodissociation of water, the SML disk appears to produce less water by a factor of ∼ 4 than required by the observations. We consider a few mechanisms by which the water production rate may be enhanced to match observations. Raising the gas temperature and hence increasing the water formation rate by the endothermic H2+OH reaction is one possibility and this could be achieved by increasing the unknown PAH abundance and FUV grain photoelectric heating in the disk. However, as H2 pure rotational emission originates at the same spatial location where there is warm molecular gas, any increase in temperature overproduces the H2 S(1) line flux. We discuss the H2 S(1) and S(2) line fluxes below. Another possibility is that the SMH disk is the better solution for the inner disk mass. This disk is a reasonable match to the CO lines (Fig. 8) and does not violate other observational constraints such as the lack of mid-IR water emission. Higher densities in the inner disk result in higher water abundances and the prompt OH emission increases by a factor of ∼ 4 in the inner disk, bringing the total OH luminosity to ∼ 7.8 × 10−6 L⊙, and only a factor of two below the observed value (see Table 6). This model slightly overestimates the OI6300A and H2 S(2) line luminosities, but may nevertheless be a feasible model for the TWHya disk. The SMH disk also has the advantage that it better fits the [OI]6300A linewidth and provides a more typical value for the turbulence parameter α in the inner disk (see Table 6). Water formation on dust grains is another mechanism that could increase water in the disk. Our disk models do not include freeze-out and desorption processes to properly consider grain- surface reactions. We estimate an upper limit to the effect of water formation on dust in a simple manner as follows. We assume that oxygen atoms stick on grains, are instantly hydrogenated and released into the gas phase as water, at a rate equal to the collision rate of O with grains. We applied dust formation of gas phase water only in regions where the dust is cold enough to prevent thermal evaporation of O or OH before H2O is formed on the grain surface, Tgr > 100K. We use this relatively high grain temperature for thermal desorption so that we obtain an upper limit on the production of water on grains. We also require that AV to the star is less than ∼ 3 so that photodesorption can clear the water ice from the grain surface (Hollenbach et al 2009). Glassgold et al. (2009) considered a similar mechanism to increase water production in disks but found that it was not significant in increasing column densities of warm, observable water. However, the gas temperature is not relevant for our calculation as the OH lines are a result of photodissociation and not thermal emission. Water formation of grains in the SML disk (with 10−5M⊙ within 4AU) leads to a higher OH luminosity, 7 × 10−6L⊙, but still a factor of ∼ 2 below what is observed. We emphasize that this 7 × 10−6L⊙ is an upper limit, given the optimistic assumptions on water formation on grains. -- 18 -- Radial transport of solids or water-bearing ices in the disk, a process not considered by us, has been suggested as a possible agent causing local enhancements and depletion of water abundances in the disk (Ciesla & Cuzzi 2006). Water ice from the midplane may also be transported to greater heights where it is subject to thermal desorption or photodesorption, leading to higher water abundances in the disk surface where it can be photodissociated. These effects, while likely to operate in disks, require time-dependent models that consider radial and vertical transport and are beyond the scope of this paper. However, one simple calculation is illuminating. If water is transported as water ice radially inwards to inner regions where it is photodissociated once, the mass influx needed is 1040 H2O molecules per second. Assuming a H/H2O ratio of 2000 (if every O atom is in H2O ice) this translates to 2 × 1043 H atoms per second or 5 × 10−7M⊙ yr−1. Since TW Hya has an age of 10Myr, and with a constant influx, this requires an improbable initial mass reservoir of 5M⊙ in the outer disk and also implies the current disk will only last 105 years. This is unlikely. On the other hand, if turbulent mixing were to act vertically, then this has the advantage that the water can be reformed at the midplane and brought to the surface to be photodissociated repeatedly. For our adopted gas mass of 0.06M⊙, we therefore require that this mass be brought to the surface of the disk where it is photodissociated every 105 years. At a typical radius, r = 10AU, the distance from midplane to the AV = 1 surface layer where water is photodissociated is ∼ 1AU. Thus, the average vertical transport speed is only 1AU/105yrs= 5 cm s−1. This suggests that vertical mixing may supply the needed water. We have discovered a new mechanism for the rotational excitation of OH that may be the most promising, but difficult to quantify precisely at this time. Here, we do not need a greater production of gas phase water. The process is initiated by the photodissociation of OH, which leads to atomic oxygen in an excited electronic state (O1D) approximately 50% of the time (van Dishoeck & Dalgarno 1984). The 1D state of oxygen, due to its empty 2p orbital, is more electrophilic than the triplet ground state 3P and is highly reactive to readily undergo bond-forming addition reactions. O(1D) + H2 re-forms OH very efficiently (with a rate coefficient γO = 3.0 × 10−10 cm3 s−1; NIST Chemical Kinetics database) leading to an effective reduction in the overall destruction of OH. This route has no thermal barrier as in the reaction of the ground state O(3P) atoms with H2 and is especially important at high gas densities when the rate of formation of OH by this route is faster than the radiative decay of the O1D atom to the ground state (with A ∼ 8 × 10−3s−1). The fraction fO of O1D that reacts with H2 before radiatively decaying to the ground state is given by fO = 1/(1 + (ncrit/n(H2))), where the critical density ncrit ∼ γO/A = 3 × 107cm−3. An important consequence of the O(1D) + H2 reaction may be that this reaction produces OH in a rotationally excited state (with an efficiency ǫOH ∼ 0.2 at J∼20-30 states, Lin & Guo 2008) which could then cascade to lower J to produce the observed MIR emission by Spitzer. In regions with n(H2) > ncrit, photodissociation of OH itself (rather than H2O as considered earlier) may result in the re-formation of rotationally excited OH. We estimate the contribution of this mechanism to the OH line emission as follows. NOH photodissociations per second of OH will produce ∼ 0.5ǫOHfO NOH OH molecules in the -- 19 -- J∼ 20 − 30 state per second. For our SML disk, we estimate that this mechanism could result in ∼ 5 × 10−6L⊙ (nearly all from the inner r . 1AU region), which recovers most of the observed OH emission which the model was deficient in when we considered the photodissociation of water alone. We will explore this mechanism for producing OH emission in greater detail in a future study where we will treat O1D as a separate species for better accuracy, and treat the efficiencies of ǫOH(v, J) individually. We conclude with a footnote to the above discussion. Mandell et al. (2008) recently reported the discovery of OH from two HAeBe stars and concluded that the emission was a result of OH fluorescence. The rotational energy diagram of the transitions observed (in this case from the v = 1 state) indicate a single rotational temperature which leads the authors to conclude that it is unlikely to be the result of "prompt" emission, i.e., OH produced by the photodissociation of water. Their models of fluorescent emission from OH match the observed data from HAeBe stars quite well. In their models, OH is excited to the v=1 state through rovibrational transitions pumped by near infrared photons and electronic transitions pumped by UV photons. However, the Spitzer data for TW Hya indicate mainly a downward rotational cascade from the high J states of v = 0 state (Najita et al. 2010). Therefore, in TW Hya the observed OH is more likely to be prompt emission. H2 rotational lines Pure rotational S(2) and S(1) line emission from H2 was reported by Najita et al. (2010) at 4.8 × 10−7 and 10−6 L⊙ respectively. Most of the H2 emission in our models comes from within radii of 20 − 30AU, with ∼ 35% of the H2 S(2) emission and 10% of the H2 S(1) emission from the inner SML disk (see Fig. 7). In the mid-disk region, H2 emission originates in the superheated dust later at AV ∼ 0.3 − 0.1 and where the gas temperatures are 100 − 500K. H2 formation in the mid and outer disk (r > 4AU) is mainly on grains and it is destroyed by FUV photodissociation. We obtain H2 S(2) and S(1) line luminosities to be 3.4 × 10−7 and 1.2 × 10−6L⊙ respectively. These are in reasonable agreement with the Spitzer IRS measurements. Bitner et al. (2008), in their ground-based survey for H2 using TEXES, did not detect H2 S(1) emission and obtained an upper limit of 5.0 × 10−7L⊙. This suggests that half of the S(1) emission observed by Spitzer IRS must originate from a more extended region outside the narrower slitwidth of TEXES, i.e. at r & 20AU. Although the H2 S(1) emitting region is quite extended (Fig. 7), half the H2 S(1) emission in the SML disk in fact originates at r . 14AU. The S(1) flux within 20 AU is 8 × 10−7L⊙ and the radial extent of emission is in moderate agreement with the TEXES and Spitzer data. The line luminosity in the H2 S(0) transition is predicted from the SML disk to be 3 × 10−7L⊙. [OI]6300A and 5577A emission We show below that the [OI]6300A line from TW Hya origi- nates from the disk, mainly from the photodissociation of OH (also see Storzer & Hollenbach 1998, Acke et al. 2005) with a small contribution from thermal emission. The line luminosities for the [OI]6300A and [OI]5577A lines from TW Hya are 10−5L⊙ and 1.4 × 10−6L⊙ respectively (Alencar & Batalha 2002, Pascucci et al. 2011, S.Edwards, private communication). We first show that the -- 20 -- observed [OI]6300A/[OI]5577A line ratio of ∼ 7 makes it unlikely that the origin is thermal. The oxygen atom has a triplet ground state (3P) and singlet D and S states which are at Eu/k ∼ 22, 850K and 48, 660K respectively. The OI 6300A transition from the 1D to the ground state and the OI 5577A transition from the 1S state to the 1D state therefore require high gas temperatures for collisional excitation to these high energy levels and subsequent radiative de- excitation. If the gas is collision dominated (in LTE), then the ratio of the two lines can be easily obtained from the ratio of nuA∆E, where nu is the upper level population, A is the Einstein A- value and ∆E is the energy of the photon emitted. In LTE, n(1S) ∼ (1/5)n(1D)e∆E/kT , where (1/5) is the ratio of the statistical weights and ∆E/k ∼ 26, 000K is the energy difference between the two levels. Therefore L6300 L5577 = n(1D)A6300∆E6300 n(1S)A5577∆E5577 ∼ 5.4 × 10−3e26000/T (1) where A6300 ∼ 6 × 10−3 s−1 and A5577 ∼ 1.3 s−1. To obtain the observed line ratio of 7, gas temperatures therefore need to be ∼ 3600K, which is possible with X-ray heating of the disk surface. However, the gas densities have to be high enough to produce LTE conditions. Collision partners can either be electrons or neutral hydrogen atoms and typical collision rate coefficients are γe ∼ 5 × 10−9(T /104)0.6 cm3 s−1 for electrons for both the transitions. The collisional rate for O(1D) with H atoms is γH ∼ 10−12 cm3 s−1 (Krems, Jamieson & Dalgarno 2006). γH for O(1S) is not known. However, the rates for the relaxation of the O(1S) state are expected to be smaller than those for the relaxation of the 1D state, because the spin-orbit couplings in electronically excited atoms are generally weaker (R. Krems, priv. comm.). We conservatively assume γH ∼ 10−12 cm3 s−1 for O(1S) as well. Therefore, electrons dominate collisions if xe > 4×10−4. For levels to achieve LTE, electron densities ne > A/γe ∼ 108 cm−3 are needed for the 5577A line (ne > 106 for the 6300A line). Collisions with H atoms require neutral densities about 2500 times these values. Even for gas with high electron fractions xe ∼ 0.1, gas densities therefore need to be high, nH & 109cm−3. These conditions are likely to be attained only in the inner disk, where gas at the surface may be dense, be partly ionized with sufficient neutral oxygen, and at T & 3600K. For gas at lower densities a balance between radiative de-excitation and collisional excitation and de-excitation of the different levels determine the level populations. We calculate the line ratios as a function of electron density and gas temperature and Figure 9 shows the contours for the observed value of 7 and other values about this number. From the contour plot, one can see that even for relatively high gas temperatures of ∼ 8000K the required electron densities are ∼ 107cm−3 implying gas densities of ∼ 109cm−3 for an electron fraction of xe ∼ 0.01, which is typical. Such conditions are unlikely, except perhaps in the innermost regions, r . 0.1AU. We also note that soft X-rays that can heat the gas to such high temperatures typically have very small absorption columns ∼ 1019cm−3, and very little mass is expected in gas at these high temperatures and densities. Such low masses may not be able to reproduce the observed high optical OI line luminosities. For typical densities in the hot disk surface, n ∼ 105−7cm−3, and electron fractions xe ∼ 0.01 − -- 21 -- 10−3 the electron densities are ne . 105cm−3, and the observed line ratio requires T & 30000K. We consider this extremely unlikely as it is very difficult to heat disk gas to these high temperatures and moreover retain a significant amount of neutral oxygen. The recent calculations of Ercolano & Owen (2010) also show that the 5577A line is appreciable relative to the 6300A line only when gas densities are high, as in their primordial disk models where the OI emission is from the inner r . 1AU region. In their models, the OI emission is thermal in origin and they quote L6300/L5577 ∼ 13 − 50 for the primordial disk models and ∼ 300 − 700 for the transition disk models, supported by the above analysis. Only one of their many models, a primordial disk with LX ∼ 2 × 1030erg s−1 has a low line ratio ∼ 13, where the emission presumably originates from gas with high electron density. In the SML disk, thermal emission contributes to about 20% of the observed [OI]6300A line and 10% of the 5577A line. In the inner disk, the luminosities are 1.2 × 10−6L⊙ and 10−7L⊙ for the thermal component of the 6300A and 5577A lines respectively, and the emission comes from regions where ne ∼ 105−8cm−3 T ∼ 4000 − 8500K at the disk surface. In the SMH disk, the calculated thermal [OI]6300A line luminosity is higher, 2 × 10−6L⊙ (Table 6). There is also thermal [OI]6300A emission from the mid and outer disk surface that is heated by X-rays to T & 5000K, the luminosity here is ∼ 1.1 × 10−6L⊙. There is negligible thermal [OI] 5577A emission from the mid and outer disk regions. We propose here that most of the OI forbidden line emission from TW Hya is the result of photodissociation of OH in the disk. The OH photodissociation layer in the SML disk is almost spatially co-existent with the H2O photodissociation layer, and this generally is located near the H/H2 transition in the disk. OH photodissociates about 50% of the time to produce an oxygen atom in the 1D state, and occasionally (5% of the time) in the higher 1S state (e.g., Festou & Feldman 1981, van Dishoeck & Dalgarno 1983). Subsequent electronic de-excitation to the ground state produces the oxygen doublet at 6300A and 6363A (1D−3P) and the 1S−1D transition produces the 5577A emission. The atoms in the O1D state produce the 6300A+6363A doublet in the branching ratio of 3 (Storey & Zeippen 2000). The ratio of these line strengths is the same as the branching ratio because both lines originate from the same upper state. These calculations are supported by comet observations of the photodissociation products due to solar Lyman α (Morgenthaler et al. 2007). We again count the number of photodissociations of OH in the model disk as we did for water, and multiply this by the energy of the transition and the theoretically calculated branching ratio. Our inclusion of the O(1D) + H2 → OH reaction leads to a lower effective photodissociation rate of OH as discussed earlier. If this reaction were not considered, then prompt emission produces a 6300A/5577A line ratio ∼ 7. However, in regions where the densities are high, such as in the inner disk, the line ratio is expected to be lower as the reactive nature of the O1D atom will result in a suppression of 6300A emission. Although the 1S state of oxygen is also more electrophilic than the triplet ground state, the unpaired electrons likely make the O(1S)+H2 reaction less favorable. Further, the radiative decay of O1S is faster (A5577 > 200A6300) requiring even higher densities for -- 22 -- the reaction with H2 to be competitive. The 5577A line is therefore not expected to be lowered significantly. In dense regions of disks, the ratio of 6300A/5577A is therefore expected to be lower NOH photodissociations per second of OH will produce ∼ 0.5(1−fO) NOH 6300A photons, than ∼ 7. where (1 − fO) is the reduction factor due to O(1D) + H2 → OH which suppresses the radiative transition leading to the 6300A line. We therefore calculate that the [OI]6300A and [OI]5577A line luminosities due to OH photodissociation are 1.1 × 10−6L⊙ and 9.3 × 10−7L⊙in the inner disk respectively, and these lines originate in the same region as the OH cascade, at r < 0.1AU, where n ∼ 1012−13cm−3 and T ∼ 500 − 1000K. OH photodissociation in the mid-disk regions produces line luminosities 5 × 10−6L⊙ (6300A) and 7 × 10−7L⊙(5577A). This emission is produced from gas with n ∼ 107−10cm−3 and T ∼ 200 − 600K out to radii r ∼ 40AU. Therefore, most of the OI luminosity from TW Hya comes from photodissociation of OH. Ercolano & Owen (2010) recently propose that the OI forbidden line emission seen in disks may arise from a X-ray driven wind. Our picture differs from theirs in two ways -- in our model the OI emission arises through a non-thermal process, and the emission arises from the disk atmosphere rather than in a wind. This perspective is consistent with the OI 6300/5577A line ratio and the lack of a blueshift for the emission. The total luminosities from the SML disk (thermal +photodissociation) are therefore 8.4 × 10−6L⊙ for the [OI]6300A line and 1.6 × 10−6L⊙for the [OI]5577A line. Our 6300/5577A line ratio is ∼ 6. The SMH disk which was a better match for the OH emision gives slightly higher [OI] emission, 1.5 × 10−5L⊙ for the 6300A line and 1.92 × 10−6L⊙ for the 5577A line for a ratio of 7.8 (also see Table 6). The intrinsic FWHM linewidth of the observed OI lines are of order 10 km s−1 (Pascucci et al. 2011). This corresponds to a velocity dispersion of about 5 km s−1. In the SML disk, the OI lines arise mostly in the mid-disk regions where the projected Keplerian speeds are low, < 2 km s−1. In addition, the gas is relatively cool and turbulent speeds are expected to be low (Hughes et al. 2010). Hence, the contribution to velocity dispersion from thermal and turbulent velocity fields is expected to also be low, < 1 km s−1. However, the photodissociation of OH leads to a recoil of the resultant O(1D) or O(1S) atoms at speeds of order 2 km s−1, and the [OI] photons are emitted prior to collisional relaxation (van Dishoeck & Dalgarno 1984). We estimate the linewidth of the OI 6300A line by adding the various components and the Keplerian, thermal and recoil contributions as appropriate. We obtain a linewidth of ∼ 6km s−1, narrower that the observed value. In the SMH disk, the calculated linewidth is more in agreement with observations, ∼ 11km s−1, because of the increased prompt emission close to the star, although the total OI6300A line luminosity is overproduced by a factor of ∼ 1.5 (Table 6). We end with a caveat that although the above production mechanism via OH photodissociation explains the OI6300A and OI5577A line strengths, ratio, and lack of an observed blue-shift in TW Hya, it may not be a more general explanation valid for all disks in which optical forbidden line emission has been detected, especially if these lines are blue-shifted and originate in a flow. For disks with different surface density distributions and FUV and X-ray luminosities, there may be a more dominant thermal contribution to [OI] emission. Further, our disk models are static and do -- 23 -- not include any emission that might arise in an extended wind (e.g., Ercolano and Owen 2010). Although we expect that our disk density and temperature structure is reasonably accurate within our grid, we do not account for any emission that might arise from heights above our vertical extent of z = r. Densities in these regions are typically low, and usually not a significant source of emission. For the optical lines (OI and SII, discussed below) however, the upper states are at ∼ 20, 000 − 40, 000K and the emission is very sensitive to temperature, and the contribution from the wind in this case might be significant. SII optical lines Pascucci et al. (2011) re-analyze the optical data of Alencar & Batalha (2002) and report the detection of the [SII]4069A line (∼ 3 × 10−6L⊙) from TW Hya. They do not detect other lines of SII and place an upper limit of 1.7 × 10−7L⊙ on the 6731A line. We find that in our SML disk, most of the SII emission arises from the inner disk in hot, dense gas that also results in the thermal OI emission calculated above. Our calculated SII line luminosities are 3.9 × 10−6L⊙ for the 4069A lines, and 8.6 × 10−7, 5.6 × 10−8 and 1.1 × 10−7L⊙ for the undetected lines at 4076A, 6716A and 6731A respectively. Our [SII]4069A line is slightly stronger than observed, however, sulfur may be somewhat depleted compared to our assumed abundance(2.8 × 10−5). NeII and NeIII [NeII] emission from TW Hya is strong and has been detected by Ratzka et al. (2007), Herczeg et al. (2007), Pascucci & Sterzik (2009) and by Najita et al. (2010). There is some discrepancy between the measured values, with more flux observed by the Spitzer study. Najita et al. (2010) conclude that [NeII] emission arising from a more extended region (r & 10AU) explains their higher flux at all three observational epochs, which the narrow slits of the ground- based observations exclude (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). A revised calibration (Pascucci et al. 2011) recovers the Spitzer flux, and suggests that most of the [NeII] emission comes from within ∼ 10AU. Earlier work by Herczeg et al. (2007) measured a line luminosity of 4.4 × 10−6L⊙with their ground- based study, similar to the Spitzer data. There is therefore some indication that the [NeII] line flux (or the underlying continuum) might be variable (Pascucci et al. 2011). Here we use the Spitzer IRS measurements of Najita et al. (2010) for the [NeII] and [NeIII] emission, 3.9 − 4.7 × 10−6L⊙ and 2 × 10−7L⊙. [NeII] emission from the disk models is found to be quite insensitive to the surface density distribution. This is because in X-ray heated regions, the [NeII] emission mainly depends only on the intercepted X-ray photon flux and the temperature of the emitting gas (HG09). A simple estimate of the expected [NeII] line luminosity can be made using the analytical expression derived in HG09, [N eII] ∼ 10−6 T 0.26e−1120/T (cid:18) f LX 0.7(cid:19)(cid:18) φX 1039s−1(cid:19) L⊙ (2) where φX ∼ 1039s−1 is the 1keV X-ray photon luminosity. In the above, we also assume that the disk intercepts a fraction f ∼ 0.7 of the stellar X-ray flux (our grid in the numerical work typically extends to zmax = r). A typical gas temperature in the [NeII] emitting layer is T ∼ 2000K. The -- 24 -- expected [NeII] luminosity for the TW Hya disk is therefore, 4 × 10−6L⊙. From our full, detailed numerical calculations, we obtain total [NeII] and [NeIII] line luminosi- ties for the SML disk as 3 × 10−6L⊙ and 3 × 10−7L⊙ respectively. Approximately 25% of the [NeII] comes from gas in the inner disk (see Fig. 7). The mid-disk region (3.5AU < r < 20AU) contributes the remaining 75% to the [NeII] luminosity in the SML disk. The [NeII] arises from the X-ray heated and partially ionized surface of the disk where gas temperatures range from 1000 − 4000K. [NeII] emission from the SML disk is restricted radially to r . 10 AU (Fig. 7), and peaks strongly at the vertically extended 4 AU rim. The X-ray produced [NeII] is somewhat lower than the observed line flux, which could be explained either by the presence of an EUV component and/or by variability of the stellar high-energy photon flux. We note that the accretion rate of TW Hya is observed to be variable on timescales similar to that for the [NeII] line flux (Eisner et al. 2010), ∼ a few years. As the X-ray and any [NeII] producing EUV radiation fields may be a result of accretion-induced stellar activity (Robrade & Schmitt 2006, HG09), this may naturally explain the variability of the [NeII] line. Pascucci & Sterzik (2009) resolve [NeII] in their spectra, and the observed linewidths and blue-shifted emission are consistent with a photoevaporative flow from the star. The line profile is very well reproduced by EUV (hν >13.6eV) photon-driven photoevaporation models (Alexander 2006). However, we do not include EUV in our source spectrum for TW Hya and can recover most of the observed flux from X-ray heated gas alone. The remaining ∼25% of the observed NeII flux may be due to the EUV layer. We can thus estimate the EUV photon luminosity as being . 3 × 1040 s−1. The [NeII]/[NeIII] line ratio may provide some measure of the origin of the emitting gas (the completely ionized EUV-heated layer or the partially ionized X-ray-heated layer below the EUV-heated layer; 10, 000K in the EUV case and ∼ 1, 000 − 3, 000K for X-rays), but is not definitive because of the uncertain nature of the EUV spectrum (HG09). However, the most natural explanation is an origin in the X-ray heated gas, where rapid charge exchange of Ne++ with H atoms quenches the [NeIII] line and produces the observed [NeII]/[NeIII] ratios. (For a more detailed discussion, see HG09.) The observed blue-shift may also arise for a X-ray induced photoevaporative flow (Gorti et al. 2009, Owen et al. 2010), and the lack of need for significant EUV to reproduce the [NeII] suggests that any photoevaporative flows may originate in primarily neutral, X-ray heated gas. The far-infrared and sub-millimeter emission lines discussed hereon originate only in the mid and outer-disk regions and are the same for the two disk models, SML and SMH. The line lumi- nosities are listed in Table 6. [OI] and [CII] fine structure lines We obtain a [OI]63µm line emission of 6×10−6L⊙, a factor of ∼ 2 higher than the Herschel PACS measurement of Thi et al. (2010). Our calculated [OI]145µm line luminosity is 3 × 10−7L⊙, and consistent with the upper limit of 4 × 10−7L⊙ obtained by Thi et al. (2010). Emission is extended and produced by ∼ 50 − 100K gas at r ∼ 30 − 120AU. -- 25 -- Our model overproduces [OI]63µm emission, and we suggest that inclusion of water freezing on grains might alleviate this problem. Freezing of water ice on grains colder than 100K removes gas phase elemental oxygen from the outer disk where dust grains are cold. Photodesorption would release some of this ice and at AV < 3, all water ice is photodesorbed from grains (Hollenbach et al. 2009). Including these processes reduces the [OI]63µm emission from the disk compared to a disk with no ice formation, to 4 × 10−6L⊙, in better agreement with the PACS observations. The [OI[145µm line is reduced from 3 × 10−6L⊙ to 2 × 10−6L⊙. A more detailed treatment of freeze-out of molecules on dust grains and desorption processes will be a subject of future work. Another possibility is that the PAH abundance in the outer disk is even lower than we assume, with a depletion factor of nearly ∼ 1000. This lowers the temperature in the outer disk sufficiently and decreases the [OI]63µm line luminosity to 4 × 10−6L⊙. If freezing were also included, this would bring the OI emission even closer to the observed value. However, we note that decreasing the PAH abundance everywhere in the disk alters the vertical structure of the mid-disk region (r < 20AU) sufficiently to deteriorate fits to observation of other species such as H2, OH and OI forbidden lines. There may, in fact, be a radial gradient in the PAH abundance in the disk, with a higher degree of depletion in the outer disk, if PAHs were to enter the disk frozen out on dust grains as suggested by Geers et al. (2009). Another possibility is that the PAH abundance is low everywhere in the disk, but that other sources of heating such as mechanical viscous dissipation are effective at the surface in the disk(r . 30AU) (e.g., Glassgold et al. 2004). Thi et al. (2010) model [OI] emission from TW Hya and conclude that the observed flux together with their 13CO observations indicate a low gas disk mass by factors of 10 − 100 compared to that expected from the disk dust mass and assuming a gas/dust ratio of 100. However, we find that lowering the gas disk mass by 10 and retaining the dust mass only marginally improves model fits to the observed [OI] emission, and worsens the other line emission fits considerably. Most of these discrepancies can be attributed to the increased grain absorption cross section per H in a disk with a low gas/dust ratio. H2 emission increases (FUV heating by PAHs becomes significant) by a factor of ∼ 2 − 3, OH prompt emission is reduced due to the increased (relative to gas) absorption of Lyman α photons by dust, and there is excess emission from CO pure rotational lines. The HCO+4-3 line requires high densities for emission, and this line luminosity is almost a factor of 10 lower for the low mass disk than the observed value. Increasing the PAH abundance by 10 as in the preferred model of Thi et al. would raise gas temperatures even higher and further increase H2 and CO emission. Although we do not concur with the Thi et al. (2010) results, we note that our calculated model line fluxes are in good agreement with results from other models they consider. Our model is most similar to their low PAH abundance models (their series 2 and 3) and if they were to base their conclusions on these alternate models, a disk mass close to ∼ 0.06M⊙ is inferred from their results. For these series, they also seem to find that the OI line luminosity is quite insensitive to disk mass in the range we consider. Their conclusion of a low gas disk mass appears to be largely based on the ratio of the 12CO/13CO line fluxes. In order to accurately interpret this measurement, a more accurate disk chemical model which includes 13CO as a species is necessary. Our model does not include 13CO. We also note that Thi et al. assume a constant 13CO to 12CO ratio to -- 26 -- calculate the 13CO flux and do not include a proper chemical model of 13CO as well. Moreover, the 13CO/12CO line ratio will be significantly affected by processes such as selective photodissociation (Lyons & Young 2005) and freeze-out processes, which are not included in our disk models or those of Thi et al. (2010). It remains to be seen whether a low gas disk mass is needed to reproduce the observed CO isotope flux ratio. The calculated [CII]158µm line luminosity is 3 × 10−7L⊙, and is consistent with the upper limit of 4.5 × 10−7L⊙ set by the Herschel observations. CO rotational lines The observed line luminosities of the CO 6-5, 3-2 and 2-1 lines are 5.0 × 10−8, 2.5 × 10−8 and 7.9 × 10−9L⊙ respectively, whereas we obtain 8 × 10−8, 2.4 × 10−8 and 7.9 × 10−9L⊙ for these lines. Purely thermal line broadening in the outer disk provides better correspondence between data and model results. This is in fair agreement with the results of Qi et al. (2006) who assume only a small amount of turbulence (∆V ∼ 0.3 kms−1) in their analysis and with the more recent results of Hughes et al. (2010) who find that the turbulent linewidths are low. A power-law surface density profile also matches the data, but has to be arbitrarily truncated at ∼ 70AU (GH08). We consider it more realistic to assume that the surface density declines more smoothly with radius, as in a disk evolving viscously and subject to photoevaporation (also see Hughes et al. 2008, Isella at al. 2009). CO rotational line emission constrains the distribution of gas in the outer disk. We do not model disk masses higher than 0.06M⊙, because we expect that appreciably higher disk masses will make the disk gravitationally unstable. Lower disk masses by a factor of 10 (Mdisk = 0.006M⊙) do not fit the CO rotational line emission well. We find that although it is possible to match the observed CO 2-1 and 3-2 line emission by altering the surface density profile in the outer disk for the lower mass disk, the CO 6-5 line emission is higher by a factor of ∼ 4 than the SML value, and hence discrepant with data. We expect freezing will not affect the emission line luminosities calculated. A simple estimate made by discounting contributions from spatial locations where the dust temperature is . 20K only slightly lowers the calculated line luminosities by ∼ 15%. Photodesorption may also keep the CO molecules from freezing on dust grains in the surface regions of the outer disk. We note that we do not need severe radial depletion of CO to explain the observed line ratios (e.g., Qi et al. 2006), although some degree of depletion (less than a factor of 3) in the mid-disk region may help lower the CO 6-5 line luminosity from the model disk. HCO+ 4-3 line van Zadelhoff et al. (2001) measured the line intensity of the HCO+ 4-3 transition from TW Hya using the JCMT, and the line luminosity is 7.7 × 10−9L⊙. Our calculation yields 4 × 10−9L⊙, nearly a factor of 2 lower than observed. We could obtain a better match by changing the surface density distribution in the outer disk to increase the strength of the HCO+4 − 3 line, but this then also changes the CO rotational line intensities and makes that agreement poorer. Further, increasing the outer disk surface density also results in a high overall disk mass, bringing the disk closer to being gravitationally unstable. The HCO+ line mainly originates in relatively -- 27 -- warm (T ∼ 20 − 100K), and high density gas (n & 107−8cm−3) at r . 50AU. The abundances of HCO+ calculated by the model in the emitting layers of the disk are a factor of 20 − 70 lower than the typical dark cloud abundance of 5 × 10−9 adopted by van Zadelhoff et al. (2001) in their analysis, and thus consistent with their derived "depletion" factors of 10 − 100. We conclude this section with the caveat that our models may not be unique solutions to the gas surface density distribution in the disk. There are theoretical uncertainties that are inherent in chemical rates and the microphysics, as well as several important processes (such as freezing of ices) have been either simplified or ignored. The complicated and computationally intensive modeling procedure also makes a full exploration of parameter space impossible at this time. Nevertheless, we find it promising that theoretical models with reasonable parameters can reproduce observed emission ranging from the optical to the sub-millimeter wavelengths with an accuracy to within a factor . 2. 4. The Origin of the Inner Gas Hole Modeling of gas emission lines and comparisons with observational data indicate that the surface density of gas is also depleted in the inner r < 4AU dust depleted region. The models are further consistent with a massive, optically thick outer disk beyond the 4AU rim. At least three different explanations have been proposed to explain the dust holes in transition disks, of which TW Hya is a leading example (e.g., Najita et al. 2007). The distribution of gas in the disk that we derive may help distinguish between these various scenarios. We examine the implications of each of the explanations for transition disks and discuss our model results in each context. Grain growth with no gas depletion in the dust hole: The first step towards planet forma- tion in disks via the core accretion scenario is the coagulation of primordial sub-micron sized dust grains into larger dust particles and planetesimals. Grain growth is expected to be more efficient in the inner disk as the densities there are higher (e.g., Lissauer et al. 2007). The population of small dust decreases due to grain growth, and as larger solids are not efficient at absorbing starlight because of their lower collective surface area, this process is manifested as a decrease in the dust continuum emission at shorter wavelengths where the warm small dust in the inner disk would emit. Grain growth does not remove disk gas, and no depletion in gas surface density within the inner regions is expected (unless gas giant planets have already formed, which is the next scenario). In this case, there would be continued accretion onto the star (as is observed for TW Hya). Our modeling of the gas disk around TW Hya when compared with observational data does not support the grain growth explanation alone as a mechanism to cause the dust hole. Based on the constraints set by gas line and continuum emission, we argue that gas must also be depleted in the inner disk region (r . 4AU), with a surface density decrease ∼ 1 − 2 orders of magnitude compared to what one would obtain by extrapolating the surface density from the outer optically -- 28 -- thick, massive disk. Although grain growth may explain the decrease in dust opacity inside 4 AU, a mechanism that depletes gas surface density by ∼ 10 − 100 is also necessary. Giant Planet Formation A widely favored explanation for the observed dust depletion in tran- sition disks is the creation of a gap by a giant planet, followed by the formation of a hole as the inner disk accretes onto the star. A gas giant planet exerts dynamical torques on the disk and clears material in its immediate vicinity to create a gap (e.g. Artymowicz & Lubow 1996, Bate et al. 2003, Rice et al. 2003). The disk interior to the planet is expected to rapidly accrete onto the central star. The outer disk mainly accretes onto the planet, with a small fraction of the mass flow (depending on the ratio of planet mass to disk mass) continuing to accrete onto the star (Lubow and D'Angelo 2006). Pressure maxima in the disk just outside the planet may act to filter dust particles (Rice et al. 2006) and further deplete the inner disk of dust. Our modeled surface den- sity distribution supports this explanation for the TW Hya disk, with the potential planet located between 2 − 4AU where the surface density may be quite low (with gas in accretion streams) and consistent with the presence of a gap. The accretion streams then feed a depleted inner accretion disk at . 2AU. We can use the surface density distribution determined by the gas emission models to set constraints on the mass of the planet orbiting TW Hya. As the planet must open a gap in the disk, or at least establish a large surface density contrast at its location, we can use the gap-opening criterion to obtain a minimum mass Mp of the planet (e.g., Lin & Papaloizou 1986) M∗(cid:19)2 (cid:18) Mp r (cid:19)5 & 3πα(cid:18) H (3) where H is the scale height of the outer disk at the radius r ∼ 4 AU. From our disk models, H/r ∼ 0.04 at 4AU, and therefore the planet has a minimum mass of ∼ 0.03 − 0.3MJ for α ∼ 10−3 − 10−1 in the outer disk. Simultaneously, one can appeal to recent hydrodynamical models of accretion onto and past a massive planet (Lubow & D'Angelo 2006), which find that a planet with at least this minimum mass must accrete matter at a rate ∼ 10 times higher than the rate onto the star. Given the current age of the system (∼10 Myrs), the planet is likely to have undergone accretion for at least 1 Myr. Even with the lower estimate of the stellar accretion rate ∼ 4 × 10−10M⊙ yr−1, this implies a minimum planet mass Mp ∼ 4MJ . An upper limit to the planet mass can also be estimated from the stellar accretion rate. The fact that gas in the outer disk can still flow through the gap induced by the planet suggests the planet is not massive enough to form a tidal barrier and repel disk matter. Depending on α, this limits the planet mass to ∼ 7MJ (α = 4 × 10−3) or ∼ 2MJ (α = 4 × 10−4) (see D'Angelo et al. 2010). We conclude that a plausible planet mass is likely to be ∼ 4 − 7MJ . The mass of the planet inferred above is high enough that dust particles with sizes larger than ∼ 1µm may be trapped in the pressure maximum in the disk at the outer edge of the gap (Rice et al. 2006). Dust particles with sizes of ∼ 2µm have been modeled to exist in the inner disk (C02), -- 29 -- consistent with this scenario. Since the inferred dust distribution in the outer disk has a maximum size of amax = 1cm, and only sub-micron sized grains cross the gap, dust filtering would result in a decrease in dust mass inside the gap. Therefore an increase in the gas/dust mass ratio across the gap by a factor of ∼ 100 (since the dust mass is proportional to p(amax)) is expected, which is consistent with our SMH model disk. A potential issue with the planet hypothesis is the migration rate. For this case, we need to consider Type II migration as the planet must be massive enough to create a gap. Viscous diffusion of the disk causes the planet to drift towards the star efficiently, but only as long as the local disk mass (πr2Σ(r), r ∼ 4AU) is greater than the planet mass. For the mid and outer disk surface density distribution, the local disk mass is ∼ 1MJ . Thus the expected planet of ∼ 4MJ is stable against migration. Photoevaporation The strong FUV and X-ray flux from TW Hya should drive massive photoevaporative flows from the disk (Ercolano et al. 2008, Gorti & Hollenbach 2009, Gorti et al. 2009, Owen et al. 2010). Photoevaporating flows have been observed by resolved ground-based [NeII]12.8µm emission from TW Hya (Pascucci & Sterzik 2009). The observed blue-shifted line profiles are well-reproduced by theory (Alexander 2006, Owen & Ercolano 2010). However, whether the inner hole in TW Hya is carved by photoevaporation remains a question. The location of the radius of the hole ∼ 4 AU is consistent with theory as it is larger than the so-called critical radius, ∼ 1AU where the hole first appears in photoevaporative theory before the disk is eroded radially outward by direct rim illumination. However, photoevaporation theory traditionally predicts that a "clean" hole, completely devoid of dust and gas, must rapidly form on viscous timescales (e.g., Alexander et al. 2006). The viscous clearing timescale in the inner s). For the TW Hya disk, tvis ∼ 104 years at 4AU for α ∼ 0.01. Therefore, the surface density drop of ∼ 100 at 4 AU implies an e-folding factor of 5, or ∼ 5 × 104 years after gap opening by photoevaporation. For a higher surface density in the inner disk and a drop of ∼ 10 at 4 AU, gap opening must be even more recent. Although there must be ongoing photoevaporation from the disk as is observed, our results appear to refute current photoevaporation theories for the creation of the inner hole in TW Hya, unless the gap creation epoch is extremely recent, which seems unlikely given the ∼ 107 year age of TW Hya. disk is tvis ∼ r2/ν, or tvis ∼ p(GM∗r)/(αc2 We note that one possibility where one could avoid a special observing epoch and where photoevaporation could work as a gap creation mechanism would be if the thermal photoevaporative flow that emanates from the rim and disk surface is partially re-captured by stellar gravity to form the inner disk and eventually accrete onto the star. In our models, the photoevaporative mass loss rate is ∼ 4×10−9M⊙yr−1. For a stellar accretion rate of ∼ 4×10−10M⊙ yr−1, 10% of the flow needs to be recaptured by the star. We use simple timescale arguments to show that this is a feasible process. For recapture, the flow timescale (tf ) to the sonic radius rs where gas escapes needs to -- 30 -- be comparable to the viscous timescale tvis of the photoevaporating gas. As tf ∼ rs/cs, and using rs = rg/2 and the expression for tvis in the preceding paragraph, we obtain tf /tvis ∼ α(rg/r)1/2. For FUV/X-ray driven photoevaporation where the flow is launched subsonically (GH09, GDH09) from the rim at r = 4AU, and a typical gas temperature of ∼ 2000K, rg = 31AU. For 10% of the flow is to be recaptured due to viscosity, we need tf /tvis ∼ 0.1 or a value of the viscous parameter α = 0.1. If the accretion rate is ∼ 10−9M⊙yr−1, the mass captured needs to be ∼ 25% for the calculated photoevaporation rate. Therefore, for this re-capture process to be possible, α needs to be relatively high in the inner disk, ∼ 0.1−0.25. However, this process is a complicated phenomenon that requires full 2D hydrodynamical calculations to resolve, including turbulent viscosity in the flow that can redistribute the angular momentum. This problem will be the subject of future study. We also note that even if the inner opacity hole is not created by photoevaporation, the process must still act to disperse the disk. The observed [NeII] line profiles indicate this is an ongoing process in the TW Hya disk. We can estimate the lifetime of the remaining disk around TW Hya using FUV/X-ray photoevaporation rates from theory (GH09) and the results from the SML disk. From our calculated disk photoevaporation rate 4 × 10−9M⊙ yr−1, we derive a disk lifetime of Mdisk/ Mpe as ∼ 107 years. Note that with the reduced disk mass of Thi et al., the expected disk lifetime is . 106years, which places us in an unlikely viewing epoch and therefore seems implausible. We calculated a time evolution model of the disk, with the SML disk as an initial configuration and assuming a viscosity parameter α = 0.005 in the outer disk using the photoevaporation models described in Gorti et al. (2009). When the effects of viscous evolution are included, the remaining lifetime of the disk is calculated to be 5 × 106 years. We note that a higher assumed value of α would lead to even shorter disk lifetimes. Most of the photoevaporation occurs at the 4AU rim, although the mass loss rate derived is lower compared to that from holed disks with directly illuminated rims (e.g., Gorti et al. 2009, Owen et al. 2010) because of the partial shielding of the rim in this case by gas in the inner disk. The photoevaporation rate is higher than recent measurements of the stellar accretion onto TW Hya, which range from 4 × 10−10 − 3 × 10−9M⊙ yr−1 (Muzerolle et al. 2000, Alencar & Batalha 2002, Eisner et al. 2010). This is consistent with the requirement for photoevaporation to create a gap in the disk, when the accretion rate at ∼ 1 − 4AU must drop below the photoevaporative mass loss rate. If photoevaporation has caused the inner hole and not a giant planet, then the amount of gas we infer to be present in the inner disk and the observed accretion onto the star imply that either the gap has been very recently created (. 105 years ago), or, that the gap was created earlier and that the observed accretion is caused by viscosity in the flow causing significant re-capture of the photoevaporating gas and accretion onto the star. If a giant planet has caused the inner hole, then the accretion rate in the outer disk is expected to be at least a factor of 10 higher than M∗, and in this case the derived photoevaporative mass loss rate is lower than the outer accretion rate, which is consistent with the giant planet hypothesis and, in this case, not consistent with the pure photoevaporation scenario for hole formation. -- 31 -- 5. Constraints on the Disk Mass from Line Emission Modeling In this paper, we model the gas disk of TW Hya and conclude that the best model which reproduces the observed gas emission line luminosities is one where there is an optically thick disk (0.06M⊙) extending from ∼3.5AU outwards, with a depleted inner region that contains ∼ 10−4 − 10−5M⊙ of gas extending to the star. The modeling suggests a lower gas mass in the inner disk by ∼ 10 − 100 than obtained by extrapolating the surface density of the outer disk radially inward. Most of the disk mass (0.06M⊙) is contained within 100AU, and the surface density in the outer disk declines sharply beyond this radius. The gas/dust mass ratio is consistent with the canonical ratio of 100 in the outer optically thick disk, and is enhanced by factors of ∼ 5 − 50 in the inner disk where both gas and dust are severely depleted compared with the extrapolated surface density of the outer disk. Although the outer disk gas/dust ratio is the same as the interstellar ratio, the cross sectional area of dust per H nucleus is ∼ 100 times less than interstellar dust, because the disk dust size distribution extends to much larger sizes, amax ∼ 1mm, than interstellar dust where amax ∼ 0.2µm. Therefore there are far fewer small dust particles (which provide most of the cross sectional area) per H nucleus, since much of the dust mass is tied up in the largest size (∼ 1 mm) particles. Inner Disk The observed CO rovibrational emission and limits on H2O line emission between 10-19 µm constrain the inner disk mass, and are best explained by a gas mass ∼ 10−5 M⊙ within r < 3.5AU. Lower disk masses (10−6M⊙) are very discrepant with observed high J CO rovibrational emission and can be ruled out. A full, undepleted disk with mass ∼ 10−3M⊙ is rejected based on the expected continuum emission due to gas opacity and the lack of observed mid-IR water emission. A disk mass of 10−4M⊙ is, however, also in reasonable agreement with data. There is some uncertainty in the inner disk dust mass as inferred from observations (∼ 2 × 10−8M⊙,C02; ∼ 10−10M⊙, Eisner et al. 2006), but the conclusion that the hole is depleted of gas and dust compared to the outer disk appears quite robust. The amount of mass present in the inner disk is fairly consistent with the observed accretion rate. Assuming steady state accretion rate onto the star M∗ = 3πνΣ, where the viscosity ν = αc2 s/Ω, α being the viscosity parameter, cs the sound speed of gas and Ω the angular velocity (e.g., Pringle 1981), we can estimate α from the observed M∗ and from Σ and cs derived from our models. For an accretion rate M∗ = 4 × 10−10M⊙ yr−1, and at r = 1AU, we then obtain α ∼ 0.04 for the SML M∗ were ∼ 10−9M⊙ yr−1, then α = 0.1 for the SML disk disk and ∼ 0.004 for the SMH disk. (If and α = 0.01 for the SMH disk.) At the inner edge, close to the magnetospheric truncation radius of 0.06AU, α is higher, ∼ 0.08 − 0.008. Our derived values for α for the preferred SML disk are somewhat higher than the 0.01 − 0.005 value typically used for protostellar disks, but consistent with the higher gas temperatures and ionization levels expected in the inner disk ( King et al. 2007, Turner et al. 2010). For the SMH inner disk mass of 10−4M⊙, the inferred value of α is more in line with values typically used. -- 32 -- Outer Disk HCO+ and CO rotational lines place upper limits on the amount of gas that is present in the outer disk, and are consistent with a disk gas mass ∼ 0.06M⊙. All the other observed line emission originates mainly in the disk at radii r . 30AU, which contains about 30% of the total disk mass. We find that decreasing the gas mass by a factor of 10 lowers the HCO+ luminosity by a factor of 5 due to its origin in dense gas. Since our model already underestimates this luminosity by a factor of 2, this would produce a major discrepancy in the model luminosity versus the observed HCO+ luminosity. In the adopted surface distribution with a tapering outer edge, CO pure rotational lines are also quite sensitive to the mass in the outer disk. The lower mass disk results in a high CO 6-5/2-1 line ratio of 16, compared with the observed ratio of 5.8 (see Table 1). Increasing the gas mass by a factor of 10 brings the disk mass to nearly the stellar mass, and such a disk would be highly gravitationally stable (Pringle 1981). We therefore consider a more massive disk than 0.06M⊙ very unlikely. In the outer disk, gas line emission may therefore constrain disk gas mass to within a factor of . 10, even though most of the gas line emission originates in the surface layers which do not trace the bulk of the disk mass. We can also set limits on the disk mass from arguments based on the presence of a planet and from expected mass loss rates due to photoevaporation. If a planet were present and accreting at ∼ 10 times the stellar accretion rate, this would imply a relatively short disk survival time for a M∗ = 4 × 10−10M⊙ yr−1, the disk 0.006M⊙ disk. Even for a low accretion rate onto the star of survival time would be ∼ 6 × 10−3M⊙/(10 M∗) ∼ 1Myr, which is short compared to the age of the system. This situation is made even more dire if the disk mass were lower or if the stellar accretion rate is at the higher range of measurements. Further, if the disk is losing mass at the estimated photoevaporation rate of 4×10−9M⊙ yr−1, a 0.006M⊙ disk would dissipate in . 1Myr, which seems unlikely given the age of TW Hya. In view of all the above, our preferred gas disk mass is 0.06M⊙. 6. Conclusions We infer the gas surface density distribution of the transition disk around TW Hya by modeling gas line emission from the disk, including H2, HCO+ and CO rotational lines, CO rovibrational lines, OH line emission, [NeII], [NeIII], [OI] fine structure emission and optical OI and SII forbidden line emission. Our standard best fit model (SML) disk reproduces observed line emission well to within a factor of ∼ 2 for most lines, except OH emission which is discrepant by a factor of ∼ 4. We consider prompt emission following photodissociation of water as mechanism to produce OH. If we can increase our gas phase water production at the disk surface by a factor of a few, we can bring all emission lines in the model to within a factor of 2 of the observations. Vertical advection of icy grains in the mid disk region to surface layers where the ice mantles are photodesorbed may be the most likely source of the extra water vapor. We further speculate that photodissociation of OH itself may result in re-formation to a rotationally excited state in very dense regions, which might lead to the observed OH emission. The alternate model of a higher inner disk mass (SMH) provides good matches to the observed emission as well. The SMH disk is better at reproducing the -- 33 -- OH emission (prompt) and the [OI]6300A linewidth, although the CO rovibrational line emission is a poorer fit and some emission lines are over-produced. Our main results on gas line emission are as follows. 1. The model disk that best matches the observational data indicates a significant decrease in gas surface density in the inner opacity hole that causes a dip in the mid-infrared continuum. Our best models have a gas mass of 10−4 − 10−5M⊙ at 0.06AU < r < 3.5AU, and 0.06M⊙between 3.5AU < r < 200AU. We exclude a full undepleted disk with 10−3M⊙ and inner disk masses of 10−6M⊙ and below. The gas/dust mass ratio in the inner disk is inferred to be greater by a factor of ∼ 5 − 50 than the canonical value of 100 which applies in the outer disk. 2. CO rovibrational emission and upper limits on H2O rotational lines provide good constraints on the mass in the inner disk. The observed CO rovibrational emission is modeled to arise from hot (T ∼ 500 − 1000K) gas inside ∼ 0.5AU, from disk surface regions where hydrogen is predominantly atomic. 3. The mass of the outer disk is constrained to lie within a factor of a few of 0.06 M⊙. Sig- nificantly higher masses lead to gravitational instability. Significantly lower masses lead to very poor fits to the CO rotational spectrum and to the HCO+ J= 4-3 line luminosity. In addition, given the relatively rapid accretion and photoevaporation of the outer disk, lower disk masses give unreasonably short outer disk lifetimes (< 1Myr). 4. We propose that OH mid-infrared emission originates from prompt emission following pho- todissociation of water in the disk very close to the star (r . 0.1AU) and from the mid-disk regions (r ∼ 4 − 40AU). Our model underestimates the production of OH by a factor of 4, and we speculate that vertical mixing may bring more water to the surface to be photodis- sociated. Grain formation of water ice followed by photodesorption could also increase the water vapor at the surface and thereby also increase the OH emission. However, enhanced water production might also lead to enhanced [OI]6300A forbidden line emission by a factor of ∼ 3 above the observed value. We suggest another promising mechanism for producing OH emission in dense regions where the photodissociation of ground state OH leads to an excited O1D atom that reacts with H2 to form rotationally excited OH that cascades giving rise to the observed MIR lines. 5. We argue that the forbidden lines of [OI] at 6300A and 5577A arise due to the photodissocia- tion of OH mainly from the mid-disk regions (r ∼ 4 − 20AU). Such an origin can successfully explain the OI6300A/5577A ratio of ∼ 7 observed. About ∼ 20% of the [OI]6300A emission is thermal in nature and has equal contributions from the inner disk (r . 4AU) and the outer disk (r ∼ 4 − 10AU). 6. NeII emission may not require the presence of a significant EUV flux from TW Hya and can be explained by X-ray heating of gas. If EUV is present, we estimate a photon luminosity of . 3 × 1040s−1 in order to explain the slight deficit in X-ray produced NeII line fluxes. -- 34 -- 7. H2 pure rotational line emission is extended and is mainly from radii r ∼ 4 − 30AU. [OI]63µm emission, CO pure rotational lines and HCO+4−3 line trace the outer disk at r ∼ 30−120AU. We conclude that grain growth alone cannot be responsible for the dust hole in the TW Hya disk because gas line emission modeling indicates a factor of ∼ 10 − 100 depletion in the gas surface density as well. The transition disk morphology of TW Hya may be explained by the presence of a ∼ 4 − 7MJ planet at r ∼ 2 − 3AU that causes the change in surface density distribution near this region. The disk is presently photoevaporating with an estimated mass loss rate of 4×10−9M⊙yr−1. If there were no planet, then photoevaporation alone may be in the process of developing a hole. The calculated photoevaporation rate is greater than the stellar accretion rate suggesting that photoevaporation could have created the gap. However ongoing stellar accretion at current rates poses problems for present photoevaporation theories. Regardless of the hole-creation mechanism, the remaining disk lifetime due to photoevaporation and viscous evolution is estimated to be ∼ 5 million years. We thank Suzan Edwards, Gennaro D'Angelo, Kees Dullemond, David Neufeld, Ewine van Dishoeck, Roman Krems, Colette Salyk and Sean Brittain for helpful discussions. We are especially grateful to John Black for alerting us about the reactive nature of excited O atoms. U.G and D.H acknowledge support by a grant under the NASA Astrophysical Data Analysis Program which enabled this work. REFERENCES Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. 1996, ApJ, 467, L77 Acke, B., van den Ancker, M. E., & Dullemond, C. P. 2005, A&A, 436, 209 Alencar, S. H. P., & Batalha, C. 2002, ApJ, 571, 378 Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 283 Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 229 Alexander, R. D., Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 216 Alexander, R. D. 2008, MNRAS, 391, L64 Bakes, E. L. O., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822 Bary, J. S., Weintraub, D. A., & Kastner, J. H. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1136 Bate, M. R., Lubow, S. H., Ogilvie, G. I., & Miller, K. A. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 213 Bethell, T., & Bergin, E. 2009, Science, 326, 1675 -- 35 -- Bergin, E., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., & Herczeg, G. J. 2003, ApJ, 591, L159 Bitner, M. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1326 Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., & Sitko, M. 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008 Carr, J. S., & Najita, J. R. 2008, Science, 319, 1504 Cazaux, S., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 604, 222 Chiang, E. I., & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368 Ciesla, F. J., & Cuzzi, J. N. 2006, Icarus, 181, 178 Currie, T., Lada, C. J., Plavchan, P., Robitaille, T. P., Irwin, J., & Kenyon, S. J. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1 D'Angelo, G., Durisen, R. H., & Lissauer, J. J. 2010, arXiv:1006.5486 (To appear in Exoplanets, ed. S. Seager, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ) Dullemond, C. P., Dominik, C., & Natta, A. 2001, ApJ, 560, 957 Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971 Eisner, J. A., Chiang, E. I., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2006, ApJ, 637, L133 Eisner, J. A., Doppmann, G. W., Najita, J. R., McCarthy, D., Kulesa, C., Swift, B. J., & Teske, J. 2010, ApJ, 722, L28 Ercolano, B., Drake, J. J., Raymond, J. C., & Clarke, C. C. 2008, ApJ, 688, 398 Ercolano, B., & Clarke, C. J. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2735 Ercolano, B., & Owen, J. E. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1553 Festou, M., & Feldman, P. D. 1981, A&A, 103, 154 Figueira, P., Pepe, F., Santos, N. C., Melo, C. H. F., Bonfils, X., Hu´elamo, N., Udry, S., & Queloz, D. 2010, EAS Publications Series, 42, 125 Geers, V. C., et al. 2006, A&A, 459, 545 Geers, V. C., van Dishoeck, E. F., Pontoppidan, K. M., Lahuis, F., Crapsi, A., Dullemond, C. P., & Blake, G. A. 2009, A&A, 495, 837 Glassgold, A. E., Najita, J., & Igea, J. 1997, ApJ, 480, 344 Glassgold, A. E., Najita, J., & Igea, J. 2004, ApJ, 615, 972 Glassgold, A. E., Meijerink, R., & Najita, J. R. 2009, ApJ, 701, 142 -- 36 -- Gorti, U., Dullemond, C. P., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1237 Gorti, U., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1539 Gorti, U., & Hollenbach, D. 2008, ApJ, 683, 287 Gorti, U., & Hollenbach, D. 2004, ApJ, 613, 424 Habart, E., Boulanger, F., Verstraete, L., Pineau des Forets, G., Falgarone, E., & Abergel, A. 2003, A&A, 397, 623 Harich, S. A., Hwang, D. W. H., Yang, X., Lin, J. J., Yang, X., & Dixon, R. N. 2000, J. Chem. Phys., 113, 10073 Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736 Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 1979, ApJS, 41, 555 Hollenbach, D., Kaufman, M. J., Bergin, E. A., & Melnick, G. J. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1497 Hollenbach, D., & Gorti, U. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1203 Herczeg, G. J., Linsky, J. L., Valenti, J. A., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Wood, B. E. 2002, ApJ, 572, 310 Herczeg, G. J., Wood, B. E., Linsky, J. L., Valenti, J. A., & Johns-Krull, C. M. 2004, ApJ, 607, 369 Herczeg, G. J., Najita, J. R., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Pascucci, I. 2007, ApJ, 670, 509 Hu´elamo, N., et al. 2008, A&A, 489, L9 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Claussen, M. J., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2007, ApJ, 664, 536 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Qi, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1119 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Cho, J., Marrone, D. P., Lazarian, A., Andrews, S. M., & Rao, R. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1204 Hughes, A. M., Wilner, D. J., Andrews, S. M., Qi, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2011, ApJ, 727, 85 Ingleby, L., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, L137 Isella, A., Carpenter, J. M., & Sargent, A. I. 2009, ApJ, 701, 260 King, A. R., Pringle, J. E., & Livio, M. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1740 Kirby-Docken, K., & Liu, B. 1978, ApJS, 36, 359 -- 37 -- Lin, D. N. C., & Papaloizou, J. 1986, ApJ, 309, 846 Lin, S. Y., & Guo, H. 2008, J. Chem. Phys., 129, 124311 Lissauer, J. J., & Stevenson, D. J. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 591 Lubow, S. H., & D'Angelo, G. 2006, ApJ, 641, 526 Lyons, J. R., & Young, E. D. 2005, Nature, 435, 317 Mamajek, E. E. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1385 Mandell, A. M., Mumma, M. J., Blake, G. A., Bonev, B. P., Villanueva, G. L., & Salyk, C. 2008, ApJ, 681, L25 Marsh, K. A., & Mahoney, M. J. 1992, ApJ, 395, L115 Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., & Hillenbrand, L. 2000, ApJ, 535, L47 Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., Megeath, S. T., Hern´andez, J., & Gutermuth, R. A. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1107 Najita, J., Carr, J. S., Glassgold, A. E., Shu, F. H., & Tokunaga, A. T. 1996, ApJ, 462, 919 Najita, J. R., Strom, S. E., & Muzerolle, J. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 369 Najita, J. R., Carr, J. S., Strom, S. E., Watson, D. M., Pascucci, I., Hollenbach, D., Gorti, U., & Keller, L. 2010, ApJ, 712, 274 Owen, J. E., Ercolano, B., Clarke, C. J., & Alexander, R. D. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1415 Pascucci, I., & Sterzik, M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 724 Pascucci, I., et al. 2011, ApJ, submitted Pontoppidan, K. M., Blake, G. A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Smette, A., Ireland, M. J., & Brown, J. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1323 Pontoppidan, K. M., Salyk, C., Blake, G. A., Meijerink, R., Carr, J. S., & Najita, J. 2010, ApJ, 720, 887 Pringle, J. E. 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137 Qi, C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, L11 Qi, C., Wilner, D. J., Aikawa, Y., Blake, G. A., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1396 Qi, C., Wilner, D. J., Calvet, N., Bourke, T. L., Blake, G. A., Hogerheijde, M. R., Ho, P. T. P., & Bergin, E. 2006, ApJ, 636, L157 -- 38 -- Rafikov, R. R., & De Colle, F. 2006, ApJ, 646, 275 Ratzka, T., Leinert, C., Henning, T., Bouwman, J., Dullemond, C. P., & Jaffe, W. 2007, A&A, 471, 173 Rettig, T. W., Haywood, J., Simon, T., Brittain, S. D., & Gibb, E. 2004, ApJ, 616, L163 Rice, W. K. M., Wood, K., Armitage, P. J., Whitney, B. A., & Bjorkman, J. E. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 79 Richter, M. J., Lacy, J. H., Zhu, Q., Jaffe, D. T., Greathouse, T. K., Moerchen, M., Mar, D. J., & Knez, C. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4857, 37 Robrade, J., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2006, A&A, 449, 737 Salyk, C., Blake, G. A., Boogert, A. C. A., & Brown, J. M. 2007, ApJ, 655, L105 Salyk, C., Pontoppidan, K. M., Blake, G. A., Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Evans, N. J., II 2008, ApJ, 676, L49 Scoville, N. Z., Krotkov, R., & Wang, D. 1980, ApJ, 240, 929 Setiawan, J., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Muller, A., Weise, P., Kurster, M. 2008, Nature, 451, 38 Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Henning, T., & Hartmann, L. W. 2010, ApJ, 710, 597 Skrutskie, M. F., Dutkevitch, D., Strom, S. E., Edwards, S., Strom, K. M., & Shure, M. A. 1990, AJ, 99, 1187 Stelzer, B., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2004, A&A, 418, 687 Storzer, H., & Hollenbach, D. 1998, ApJ, 502, L71 Strom, K. M., Strom, S. E., Edwards, S., Cabrit, S., & Skrutskie, M. F. 1989, AJ, 97, 1451 Takeuchi, T., Miyama, S. M., & Lin, D. N. C. 1996, ApJ, 460, 832 Tappe, A., Lada, C. J., Black, J. H., & Muench, A. A. 2008, ApJ, 680, L117 Thi, W.-F., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 425, 955 Thi, W.-F., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L125 Tsuji, T. 1966, PASJ, 18, 127 Turner, N. J., Carballido, A., & Sano, T. 2010, ApJ, 708, 188 Valenti, J. A., Fallon, A. A., & Johns-Krull, C. M. 2003, ApJS, 147, 305 van Dishoeck, E. F., & Dalgarno, A. 1984, Icarus, 59, 305 -- 39 -- van Dishoeck, E. F., & Dalgarno, A. 1984, ApJ, 277, 576 van Dishoeck, E. F., Thi, W.-F., & van Zadelhoff, G.-J. 2003, A&A, 400, L1 van Harrevelt, R., & van Hemert, M. C. 2000, J. Chem. Phys., 112, 5777 van Zadelhoff, G.-J., van Dishoeck, E. F., Thi, W.-F., & Blake, G. A. 2001, A&A, 377, 566 Varni`ere, P., Blackman, E. G., Frank, A., & Quillen, A. C. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1110 Webb, R. A., Zuckerman, B., Platais, I., Patience, J., White, R. J., Schwartz, M. J., & McCarthy, C. 1999, ApJ, 512, L63 Weintraub, D. A., Kastner, J. H., & Bary, J. S. 2000, ApJ, 541, 767 Wilner, D. J., Bourke, T. L., Wright, C. M., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Wong, T. 2003, ApJ, 596, 597 Zuckerman, B., Forveille, T., & Kastner, J. H. 1995, Nature, 373, 494 -- 40 -- Table 1: Observations of gas emission lines λ Line Luminosity (l⊙) Reference Line CO 6-5 CO 3-2 CO 2-1 HCO+4-3 OI OI CII NeII 434µm 867µm 1.3 mm 841µm 63µm 145µm 157µm 12.8 µm NeIII H2 S(2) 15.5 µm 12.28 µm 4.6 × 10−8 2.4 × 10−8 7.9 × 10−9 7.7 × 10−9 2.7 × 10−6 < 4 × 10−7 < 4.8 × 10−7 3.9 − 4.7 × 10−6 3.0 × 10−6 2.0 × 10−7 4.8 × 10−7 < 4.8 × 10−7 Obs. Facility SMA SMA SMA JCMT Herschel PACS Herschel PACS Herschel PACS Spitzer IRS Qi et al. 2006 Qi et al. 2006 Qi et al. 2006 van Zadelhoff et al. 2001 Thi et al. 2010 Thi et al. 2010 Thi et al. 2010 Najita et al. 2010 Pascucci & Sterzik 2009 VLT/VISIR (r < 10AU) Najita et al. 2010 Najita et al. 2010 Bitner et al. 2008 Najita et al. 2010 Bitner et al. 2008 Najita et al. 2010 Salyk et al. 2007 Bary et al. 2003 Herczeg et al. 2002 Suzan Edwards Suzan Edwards Pascucci et al. 2011 Spitzer IRS Spitzer IRS Gemini/TEXES (r < 13.7AU) Spitzer IRS Gemini/TEXES (r < 20AU) Spitzer IRS Keck II/Echelle KPNO/Phoenix HST/STIS Keck/Echelle Keck/Echelle FEROS H2 S(1) 17.0 µm 0.96 − 1.0 × 10−6 OH COvib H2,vib H2 fluo. OI OI SII MIR- SH NIR 2.12µm UV 6300 A 5577 A 4069 A < 5.5 × 10−7 6.2 × 10−6 1.0 × 10−5 7.9 × 10−8 1.9 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−5 1.4 × 10−6 3.0 × 10−6 -- 41 -- Table 2: Dust model parameters Optically Thin Inner Disk Inner radius Outer radius Dust disk mass Surface Density Σ Min. grain size Max. grain size Dust Composition Optically Thick Outer Disk Inner radius Outer radius Dust disk mass (with a < 1mm) Surface Density Σ Min. grain size (amin) Max. grain size (amax) Dust Composition 0.06 AU 3.5 AU 2.4 × 1025g ∝ r−1 0.9µm 2.0µm Glassy Pyroxene 3.5 AU 200 AU 4.8 × 1029g Composite (Fig.1) 0.01µm 1 mm Silicates+graphite Table 3: Model calculations for lines (sum of inner and outer disk contributions) that constrain the inner disk mass Line Obs.Data SMH SML (Mi = 10−4M⊙) (Mi = 10−5M⊙) (Mi = 10−6M⊙) COvib (P Series) OH (prompt) (L⊙) 10−5 1.5 × 10−5 (L⊙) 2.1 × 10−5 7.8 × 10−6 OI 6300A (Thermal) (Prompt) OI 5577A (Thermal) (Prompt) 10−5 1.4 × 10−6 H2 S(2) H2 S(1) NeII NeIII OI linewidth (km s−1) α (visc. parameter) 4.8 × 10−7 1.0 × 10−6 5.0 × 10−6 2.0 × 10−7 10.0 1.5 × 10−5 (3.1 × 10−6) (1.2 × 10−5) 1.92 × 10−6 (2.2 × 10−7) (1.7 × 10−6) 6.8 × 10−7 1.3 × 10−6 3.1 × 10−6 3.0 × 10−7 11.0 0.01-0.02 (L⊙) 1.8 × 10−5 4 × 10−6 8.4 × 10−6 (2.3 × 10−6) (6.1 × 10−6) 1.6 × 10−6 (1.0 × 10−7) (1.5 × 10−6) 3.4 × 10−7 1.2 × 10−6 3.0 × 10−6 3.0 × 10−7 6.0 0.1-0.2 (L⊙) 1.6 × 10−5 2.8 × 10−6 8.9 × 10−6 (2.8 × 10−6) (6.1 × 10−6) 9.4 × 10−7 (1.3 × 10−7) (8.1 × 10−7) 2.5 × 10−7 1.1 × 10−6 3.4 × 10−6 3.5 × 10−7 6.1 1-2 Contribution from r > 4AU (L⊙) -- 2.8 × 10−6 6.1 × 10−6 (1.1 × 10−6) (5 × 10−6) 7 × 10−7 (1.0 × 10−10) (7 × 10−7) 2.2 × 10−7 1.1 × 10−6 2.3 × 10−6 1.0 × 10−7 -- 42 -- Table 4: Calculated model line luminosities for lines originating beyond 4AU Line (λ) OI(63µm) OI(145µm) CII(158µm) CO 6-5(430µm) CO 3-2(866µm) CO 2-1(1.3mm) HCO+4 − 3(841µm) Obs. Data (L⊙) 2.7 × 10−6 < 4 × 10−7 < 4.5 × 10−6 4.6 × 10−8 2.4 × 10−8 7.9 × 10−9 7.7 × 10−9 Model (L⊙) 3 − 6 × 10−6 1 − 3 × 10−7 3 × 10−6 8 × 10−8 2.4 × 10−8 7.1 × 10−9 4 × 10−9 -- 43 -- Fig. 1. -- The input spectrum used for TW Hya, which is a composite of the stellar, FUV and X-ray spectra shown here as the flux at the stellar surface as a function of photon energy. The vertical dashed lines indicate the EUV region which has been ignored in our modeling. -- 44 -- Fig. 2. -- Surface density distribution of the SML (solid line) and SMH (dashed line) disks. The surface density follows a power law (Σ ∝ r−1) within 4 AU, rises over a "rim" region (3.5 − 4AU), and is approximately a power law (Σ ∝ r−0.7) from 4 − 40AU. In the outer disk (r & 40AU), the surface density rapidly decreases with radius. See §3.1 for the analytic formulation of Σ(r). -- 45 -- Fig. 3. -- The density and temperature structure of the disk for the SML disk. The outer disk (r & 40AU) density structure shows a somewhat flattened disk structure, resulting in relatively low disk temperatures in these regions. The black line in both panels shows the height at which the visual extinction to the star, AV = 1. The insets show the structure in the inner disk for r < 1AU where most of the line emission is produced. -- 46 -- Fig. 4. -- The vertical temperature(solid line) and density(dashed line) distribution is shown at a typical radius in the inner disk (0.1AU). The dominant heating (above) and cooling (below) mechanisms are shown and the radial extent where they are important in overall thermal balance is indicated. The photodissociation fronts of CO and H2 are also marked on the plots. -- 47 -- Fig. 5. -- The disk structure in the mid-disk region at a radius of 6 AU. Here, the dominant FUV heating by PAHs and photoreactions near the AV = 1 layer, and X-rays at the surface. Near the midplane, dust collisions are important. The main gas coolants are CO and H2 rotational lines deeper in the disk, and OI (63µm and 6300A) and [NeII] and [ArII] at the disk surface. -- 48 -- Fig. 6. -- The disk structure at a representative radius in the outer disk (30AU). The dominant heating and cooling mechanisms and their radial extent is indicated in the figure. -- 49 -- Fig. 7. -- The cumulative line luminosities (L(r)) normalized to their total values (Table 6) for the SML as a function of disk radius. The molecular lines, including prompt emission, usually arise from near the AV = 1 layer, whereas the OI and NeII thermal emission originate above this layer in the disk surface. The 10% and 90% levels (dotted lines) mark the radii between which most of the emission originates. For example, the [NeII]12.8µm line mainly arises from gas located between 1 and 8 AU. -- 50 -- Fig. 8. -- Calculated CO rovibrational fluxes for the v = 1 − 0, P(J= 1 − 30) transitions and the SML inner disk mass (solid line) are shown for each rotational quantum number J. The filled circles are the photosphere and veiling corrected measurements from Salyk et al. (2007). Open squares are corrected data from Rettig et al. (2004) (see text). The dashed line is for a higher disk mass (10−4M⊙) that also fits the data reasonably well. The 10−6M⊙ inner disk mass model (dotted line) is a poor fit to the data. -- 51 -- Fig. 9. -- Contours of the thermal line ratio OI6300A/OI5577A as a function of the gas temperature and electron density from a statistical equilibrium calculation of the O atomic levels are shown. TW Hya has an observed ratio of 7 (solid line) which requires high electron densities at typical neutral gas temperatures. For an electron abundance xe ∼ 0.01 and T ∼ 8000K, gas densities n ∼ 109cm−3 are needed to reproduce the observed 6300A/5577A line ratio by thermal OI emission.
1201.5274	1	1201	2012-01-25T14:04:46	Symplectic integration of space debris motion considering several Earth's shadowing models	[ "astro-ph.EP", "math-ph", "math-ph" ]	In this work, we present a symplectic integration scheme to numerically compute space debris motion. Such an integrator is particularly suitable to obtain reliable trajectories of objects lying on high orbits, especially geostationary ones. Indeed, it has already been demonstrated that such objects could stay there for hundreds of years. Our model takes into account the Earth's gravitational potential, luni-solar and planetary gravitational perturbations and direct solar radiation pressure. Based on the analysis of the energy conservation and on a comparison with a high order non-symplectic integrator, we show that our algorithm allows us to use large time steps and keep accurate results. We also propose an innovative method to model Earth's shadow crossings by means of a smooth shadow function. In the particular framework of symplectic integration, such a function needs to be included analytically in the equations of motion in order to prevent numerical drifts of the energy. For the sake of completeness, both cylindrical shadows and penumbra transitions models are considered. We show that both models are not equivalent and that big discrepancies actually appear between associated orbits, especially for high area-to-mass ratios.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Symplectic integration of space debris motion considering several Earth's shadowing models by Ch. Hubaux, A. Lemaıtre, N. Delsate and T. Carletti Report naXys-01-2012 19 January 2012 Namur Center for Complex Systems University of Namur 8, Rempart de la Vierge, B5000 Namur (Belgium) http://www.naxys.be Symplectic integration of space debris motion considering several Earth's shadowing models Ch. Hubauxa,∗, A. Lemaıtrea, N. Delsatea,b, T. Carlettia aNamur Center for Complex Systems (NAXYS) Department of Mathematics, University of Namur, 8 Rempart de la Vierge, B-5000 Namur, Belgium bAstronomie et Syst`emes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France Abstract In this work, we present a symplectic integration scheme to numerically compute space debris motion. Such an integrator is particularly suitable to obtain reliable trajectories of objects lying on high orbits, especially geosta- tionary ones. Indeed, it has already been demonstrated that such objects could stay there for hundreds of years. Our model takes into account the Earth's gravitational potential, luni-solar and planetary gravitational per- turbations and direct solar radiation pressure. Based on the analysis of the energy conservation and on a comparison with a high order non-symplectic integrator, we show that our algorithm allows us to use large time steps and keep accurate results. We also propose an innovative method to model Earth's shadow crossings by means of a smooth shadow function. In the particular framework of symplectic integration, such a function needs to be included analytically in the equations of motion in order to prevent numerical drifts of the energy. For the sake of completeness, both cylindrical shadows and penumbra transitions models are considered. We show that both mod- els are not equivalent and that big discrepancies actually appear between associated orbits, especially for high area-to-mass ratios. Keywords: Space debris; Symplectic integration ; Solar radiation pressure; Shadowing effects ; High area-to-mass ratios ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Ch. Hubaux) 1 1. Introduction Several works have already shown the great importance of the direct so- lar radiation pressure effects on space debris motion, especially in the case of high area-to-mass ratios (Liou & Weaver, 2005; Chao, 2005; Anselmo & Pardini, 2005; Chao, 2006; Valk et al., 2008; Lemaıtre et al., 2009; Valk et al., 2009). Moreover, some authors have pointed out that Earth's shadow- ing effects should not be neglected and that these phenomena could lead to significant short-periodic perturbations (see Kozai 1961, Ferraz-Mello 1972, Aksnes 1976 and Valk & Lemaıtre 2008). Recent observations (Schildknecht et al., 2010) have made it possible to identify the area-to-mass ratio of 274 uncorrelated objects. The resulting AIUB1/ESA catalogue contains a sig- nificant population of objects with area-to-mass ratios larger than 1 m2/kg and as high as 86.7 m2/kg. In this framework, perturbations due to solar radiation pressure, coupled to Earth's shadows, become essential. This paper will focus on the numerical propagation of space debris motion, considering both cylindrical shadow and penumbra transition models. A second aspect of the space debris dynamics that we decided to take into account in this analysis is their possible long lifetimes. If it is obvious, for low orbits, that the efficiency of the drag forces cleans the area in few years, it is slightly different for higher orbits, especially geostationary ones, on which the objects can stay for hundreds of years (see Chao 2005, Valk et al. 2008, etc). Up to now the numerical simulations concerning the debris have been performed using a wide variety of numerical integrators for short timescales and the choice of a symplectic (or quasi-symplectic) integration scheme to compute the orbit of space debris has rarely been done (see Breiter et al. 2005 for an application of a fourth order symplectic integrator of the Wisdom- Holman type). Nevertheless, it is well known that these algorithms enable the use of large time steps, show excellent energy preservation properties on long time scales and are less time-consuming than non-symplectic schemes. The introduction of Earth's shadow in this context is a challenging prob- lem. Indeed, the actual direct solar radiation pressure reaching the satellite has to be computed with a sufficiently smooth function and included directly in the equations of motion in order not to introduce numerical errors in the symplectic scheme. The idea of the introduction of a continuous shadow function equal to one 1Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern 2 in direct sunlight and zero otherwise has been first proposed in Ferraz-Mello (1964) and Ferraz-Mello (1965). This function depends on the angle formed by the geocentric Cartesian position of space debris and the dark pole of the Earth's terminator. Another approximation of this shadow function has been proposed later on in L´ala & Sehnal (1969). Then, a way of comput- ing shadow boundaries has been proposed in Escobal (1976). It has to be noted that, with such approximations, only cylindrical shaped Earth's shad- ows could be modeled. Hence, these solutions have been improved further in order to take into account penumbra transitions. For example, umbra and penumbra cone boundaries have been computed in Escobal (1976). Other de- tailed studies exist. For example, penumbra transitions and several physical processes in the atmosphere have been added in Vokrouhlicky et al. (1993) to provide a realistic shadow crossing model. This theory being really time consuming, an approximate version has been presented in Vokrouhlicky et al. (1994a). Penumbra phenomena induced by the solar radiation pressure from the Earth-reflected sunlight have also been studied in Vokrouhlicky et al. (1994b), leading to the conclusion that these effects were much less important than the direct solar radiation pressure. A further numerical in- vestigation (Vokrouhlicky et al., 1996) has also shown that the oblateness of the Earth did not bring significant differences, compared to a spherical Earth. In light of this, the oblateness of the Earth has not been included in our shadow models. Eventually, we can find another geometrical model of the penumbra transition in Montenbruck & Gill (2005), where the compu- tation of the degree of occultation of the Sun by the Earth is performed by means of apparent radii in geocentric Cartesian coordinates. In this paper, we present an innovative theory to model both cylindrical and conical shadows (umbra-penumbra transitions) crossings. Our model being totally included in the equations of motion of the space debris, this is well adapted to our symplectic integration scheme. Besides, our formulation has the advantage to build a smooth shadow function. Hence, it can also be included in the variational equations whose solutions are required by a variety of chaos indicators. It should be noted that it cannot be achieved with the formulation from Montenbruck & Gill (2005). The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we describe the forces con- sidered in our Hamiltonian model. Sec. 3 is devoted to the presentation of the symplectic integrator (Sec. 3.1), its implementation (Sec. 3.2) and shows a comparison with an efficient non-symplectic integrator (Sec. 3.3). Our shadow modelling theory is then developed in Sec. 4. First (Sec. 4.1), 3 we present the basis of the model for a cylindrical-shaped Earth's shadow. Second, details are given about the adaptation of this theory in the case of penumbra transitions in Sec. 4.2. For the sake of clarity, full mathematical developments have been moved to different appendices. Eventually, we com- pare our penumbra transition model to the one proposed in Montenbruck & Gill (2005) in the case of a typical shadow crossing occuring on a geostation- ary orbit (Sec. 4.3). We also show the difference between the evolution of the orbital elements of a space debris crossing either cylindrical or conical Earth's shadows. 2. Model Let us consider the following autonomous Hamiltonian function H(v, Λ, r, θ) = Hkepl(v, r) + Hrot(Λ) + Hgeopot(r, θ) +H3body(r) + Hsrp(r) where r := (x, y, z) and v are respectively the Cartesian geocentric coordi- nates and velocities of the satellite, θ is the Greenwich sidereal time and Λ is its associated momentum. Our model takes into account the attraction of the Earth as a point mass central body (Hkepl), the rotation of the Earth around itself (Hrot) and the perturbations due to the Earth gravity field (Hgeopot), third bodies (mainly the Sun and the Moon) (H3body) and the solar radiation pressure (Hsrp). The attraction of the Earth as a central body is accounted for as Hkepl = v2 2 − µ r where r := krk, v := kvk and µ = GM⊕ is the standard gravitational coefficient. The rotation of the Earth around its axis of smallest inertia is modeled as Hrot = θΛ. The complete Earth's potential expressed in the frame rotating around the Earth's axis of smallest inertia and with the same angular speed can be written as Ugeopot(r, λ, φ) = − µ r ∞ Pn=0 4 n r (cid:19)n Pm=0(cid:18)R⊕ Pnm(sin φ) ×(Cnm cos mλ + Snm sin mλ) where (r, λ, φ) are the geocentric spherical coordinates of the satellite, R⊕ represents the equatorial radius of the Earth, Pnm are Legendre functions and Cnm and Snm are the spherical harmonics coefficients. Thanks to formulas presented in Cunningham (1970) and later in Mon- tenbruck & Gill (2005), we are able to write Ugeopot as a function of r Ugeopot(r) = − µ R⊕ ∞ n CnmVnm(r) + SnmWnm(r). Xn=0 Xm=0 Let us remark that Vnm and Wnm depend directly on Cartesian coordinates and are defined recursively. Also note that Ugeopot is still written in the same rotating frame as the one described above. The following simple change of variable x 7→ x cos θ + y sin θ y 7→ −x sin θ + y cos θ lets us express Ugeopot in the fixed inertial geocentric frame. Also note that the zero degree is already present in Hkepl. Moreover, given that the center of mass coincides with the origin of the reference frame C10 = C11 = S10 = S11 = 0. Hence, the sum in Ugeopot should start at n = 2. It follows that, Hgeopot(r) = − µ R⊕ ∞ n Xn=2 Xm=0 CnmVnm(r, θ) + SnmWnm(r, θ). The EGM96 model (Lemoine et al., 1970) of degree and order 360 is used as Earth gravity model. Perturbations due to third bodies (the Sun, the Moon and planets of the solar system) are introduced in the Hamiltonian function as H3body = −Xi µi(cid:18) 1 kr − rik − r · ri krik3(cid:19) where µi = GMi and ri is the geocentric Cartesian coordinates of any third body of mass Mi. Position and velocity of the latter are computed by means of Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) DE405 planetary and lunar ephemeris (Standish, 1998). This external contribution introduces a time dependence in the Hamiltonian, formulated as a quasi periodic function. For simpler 5 models of the solar orbit, limited to three frequencies for example, we could have introduced three new variables (linear functions of time) and associated conjugated momenta (as it has been done for the rotation of the Earth). However it would have considerably increased the number of the differential equations to deal with, and the model would stay approximate. This is the reason for which we have chosen to work on with a quasi-symplectic formulation in this context. Eventually, our model also includes the direct solar radiation pressure. Three standard physical models are used: the absorption, the reflection and the diffusion. Hence, the force induced by the radiation pressure is obtained by adding together the elementary forces accounting for each effect. The model assumes that space debris are spherical objects and that there is no radiation from the surface of the Earth. Detailed information about the model can be found in Milani & Gronchi (2009). It leads to the following potential: Hsrp = − 1 Pr kr − r⊙k A m a2 ⊙ where r⊙ is the geocentric Cartesian position of the Sun, Pr = 4.56 × 10−6 N/m2 is the radiation pressure for an object located at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun, A/m is the area-to-mass ratio of the space debris and a⊙ is equal to the mean distance between the Sun and the Earth (i.e. a⊙ = 1 AU). The construction of this potential is also explained in e.g. Montenbruck & Gill (2005). Let us remark, that, making some assumptions, Hsrp is writ- ten under its conservative form. Moreover, the shadow of the Sun by the Earth is not yet considered. 3. Numerical integration scheme 3.1. Symplectic integrator Let H(p, q) = A + εB be an autonomous Hamiltonian with N degrees of freedom where p, q ∈ RN are respectively momenta and variable vectors. The Hamiltonian vector field can be written as where x = {H, x} = LHx = ∂x ∂qj − ∂H ∂qj ∂x ∂pj N ∂H ∂pj Xj=1 q (cid:19) ∈ R2N . 6 x =(cid:18) p The solution of this differential equation is given by x(t) = etLH x(t0). (1) The Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff theorem (Bourbaki, 1972) ensures that we can find a general integrator with n steps of the form Sn(τ ) = ec1τ LAed1τ LεB · · · ecnτ LAednτ LεB = eτ LK where τ is the time span covered by the integration process. Coefficients ci and di are to be chosen carefully, so that the order of the integrator is improved on. In this case, integrating H at order m means that we exactly evaluate eτ LK where K = A + εB + O(τ m). In Laskar & Robutel (2001), four classes of symmetric symplectic integra- tors are presented. SABA2n(τ ) = ec1τ LAed1τ LεB ... × ecnτ LAednτ LεBecn+1τ LAednτ LεBecnτ LA × ...ed1τ LεBec1τ LA SABA2n+1(τ ) = ec1τ LAed1τ LεB ... × ecn+1τ LAedn+1τ LεBecn+1τ LA × ...ed1τ LεBec1τ LA SBAB2n(τ ) = ed1τ LεBec2τ LAed2τ LεB... × ecn+1τ LAedn+1τ LεBecn+1τ LA × ...ed2τ LεBec2τ LAed1τ LεB SBAB2n+1(τ ) = ed1τ LεBec2τ LA... × edn+1τ LεBecn+2τ LAedn+1τ LεB × ...ec2τ LAed1τ LεB It is shown that, if ε is small enough, one can find a suitable set of coeffi- cients {ci, di} such that K = A + εB + O(τ 2nε + τ 2ε2). (2) As a matter of fact, the order of the error does not only depend on the time step anymore but also on ε. It yields excellent energy preservation properties and enables us to use bigger time steps than with any other non-symplectic integration scheme. 7 3.2. Implementation As explained in Section 3.1, the Hamiltonian function H has to be split into two integrable parts in order to be expressed as the perturbation of an integrable one. Moreover, the B-part must always be smaller than the A-part (i.e. ε := B/A is small enough). A convenient possibility is the following one: H(v, Λ, r, θ) = A(v, r, Λ) + B(r, θ) where A(v, r, Λ) = Hkepl(v, r) + Hrot(Λ) B(r, θ) = Hgeopot(r, θ) + H3body(r) + Hsrp(r) In this case, each perturbation is put in the B-part and is of lower order than the energy associated to the Keplerian problem (i.e. the A-part). Each time that the operator eciτ LA is applied on the state vector (v, θ, r, Λ)T (t0), the resulting vector corresponds to the solution of the Keplerian problem at time epoch t0 + ciτ . This computation is performed analytically in order to reduce numerical cost and keep a high accuracy. Moreover, the sidereal time is increased linearly θ(t0 + ciτ ) = θ(t0) + ciτ θ where θ is assumed to be constant. On the other hand, the solution of ediτ LεB(v, θ, r, Λ)T (t0) is computed nu- merically as the solution of the set of differential equations v = −d1ε∇rB(r, θ) Λ = −d1ε∇θB(r, θ) r = d1ε∇vB(r, θ) = 0 θ = d1ε∇ΛB(r, θ) = 0 .   It follows that   v Λ r θ   (t0 + diτ ) = ed1τ LεB  (t0) v(t0) − d1ετ ∇rB(r(t0), θ(t0)) Λ(t0) − d1ετ ∇θB(r(t0), θ(t0)) v Λ r θ   r(t0) θ(t0) 8 =     3.3. Numerical simulation This section aims to prove the numerical efficiency of our integrator. First, we show in Fig. 1 the maximum relative error in energy and CPU time required by our symplectic scheme to propagate the orbit of a space debris on a long time span (500 years), depending on several time steps and integrator orders. Initial conditions are a = 42164.140 km, e = 0.1, i = 0.1 rad, Ω = ω = M = 0 rad and the initial Julian date is 2455194.5 days. The model includes the geopotential up to degree and order 4. Time steps for these simulations have been set to 24, 12, 4, 1 and 1/2 hours. Several observations can be made from Fig. 1. On the one hand, the system being fully symplectic in this case, the energy is accurately preserved even with large time steps. Let us point out that we could not go below the accuracy treshold of 10−12. On the other hand, CPU times are really small, keeping in mind that the orbit has been propagated over 500 years. Computations have been performed on a E5440 Intel Xeon CPU (2.83 GHz) with 6144 KB cache size. The introduction of the gravitational perturbation of the Sun does not prevent the energy to be preserved on long time scales. However, the quasi- symplecticity of our integrator means that relative variations of the energy are about 10−6 for the third body and solar radiation pressure perturbations, which is the amplitude of the quasi periodic solar motion. In light of this, we compare the relative energy error associated to two different orbits. The model still includes the geopotential up to degree and order 4 and we add the solar graviational perturbation. The difference appears in the computation of the Cartesian position of the Sun. On the one hand, we use the JPL ephemeris and, on the other hand, we consider a Keplerian solar motion with eccentricity and inclination equal to zero (part of the ephemeris module of the NIMASTEP software described below). This lets us reduce the quasi periodic motion of the Sun. Results are illustrated in Fig. 2, where the SABA4 integrator has been used. Obviously, a circular and coplanar solar orbit reduces the relative error in energy to order 10−9. Fig. 2 also emphasizes the excellent energy preservation over the years, even when JPL ephemeris are used. It has to be noted that the introduction of the JPL ephemeris greatly increases the computation cost. As a point of comparison, the CPU time needed for this simulation after 500 years with a time step of 4 hours and the SABA4 integrator is 22 seconds. It corresponds roughly to twice the amount of CPU time corresponding to the same propagation without the computation of the Sun's position. 9 10−2 10−4 10−6 y g r e n e n SABA2 SABA4 SABA8 SABA10 i r o r r e e v i t l a e R 10−8 10−10 10−12 102 101 ] c e s [ e m i t U P C 100 Timestep [hour] 101 SABA2 SABA4 SABA8 SABA10 100 100 Timestep [hour] 101 Figure 1: Maximum relative errors in energy (top panel) and CPU times (bottom panel) for different integrator orders, as a function of the time step. Initial conditions are a = 42164.140 km, e = 0.1, i = 0.1 rad, Ω = ω = M = 0 rad and the initial Julian date is 2455194.5 days. The model includes the geopotential up to degree and order 4. The integration has been performed on a time span of 500 years. 10 10−4 10−6 10−8 10−10 10−12 y g r e n e n i r o r r e e v i t l a e R 10−14 0 Simplified Sun orbit Real Sun Orbit 1000 2000 Time [yr] 3000 4000 5000 Figure 2: Comparison of the relative errors in energy as a function of time. Both real and simplified (i.e. e⊙ = 0 and i⊙ = 0 rad) orbits of the Sun are considered. Initial conditions are a = 42164.140 km, e = 0.1, i = 0.1 radians, Ω = ω = M = 0 radians and the initial Julian date is 698382.5 days. The model includes the geopotential up to degree and order 4 and the graviational perturbation of the Sun. The simulation has been run with the SABA4 integrator. 11 Step size [day] Step size [s] CPU time [s] 1/200 1/100 1/86 1/75 432 864 1004.65 1152 142.01 79.31 70.73 66.83 Table 1: CPU times required by NIMASTEP (with ABM10) with respect to time steps. Eventually, we compare our integration scheme to the NIMASTEP soft- ware (Delsate & Comp`ere, 2011). NIMASTEP (Numerical Integration of the Motion of Artificial Satellites orbiting a TElluric Planet) is an exten- sive tool that allows to integrate numerically the osculating motion of an arbitrary object (natural or artificial satellite, space debris...) orbiting a central body ((dwarf-) planets or asteroids of the Solar System) taking into account a large number of forces, integrators and options. This software has been successfully validated and compared to other external softwares. In the following comparisons, NIMASTEP is used with the Adams-Bashforth- Moulton integrator of order ten (Hairer et al., 1993), hereafter referred to as ABM10. Starting from the same initial conditions, both integrators have been used to numerically propagate the orbit. For the sake of completeness, all kind of perturbations have been considered. Hence, we take into account the geopotential up to degree and order 4, luni-solar perturbations and the solar radiation pressure with A/m = 0.01 m2/kg. In this case, the fourth order SABA integrator has been used with time steps equal to 4 hours. The CPU time required to propagate the initial conditions to 190 years with this method is 11.54 s. Table 1 lists each CPU time required by NIMASTEP for different time steps. In order to get an idea of the number of steps per revolution (about one day for these initial conditions), time steps are given in terms of fractions of one day and in seconds. This table let us point out that, even if NIMASTEP performs the numerical integration quickly, the fact that our symplectic scheme can use large (ten times bigger) time steps make it obviously a faster algorithm. Then, given that both orbits obtained with our symplectic scheme and NIMASTEP are very close to each other, we have decided to show the absolute difference between each Keplerian element and for each time step. Results can be seen in Fig. 3. For each time step and orbital element, the absolute difference has been computed each day. Both softwares having 12 been developed using different units of time and distance, residual errors could have been introduced artificially. Anyway, we are pretty confident that our comparison does not suffer too much from this kind of numerical errors. From Fig. 3, it can be seen that absolute errors are quite small for the eccentricity, inclination, longitude of ascending node and argument of pericenter, no matter which time step is considered. The situation is slighlty different for the semi-major axis. In this case, the error is clearly bigger for larger time steps and increases linearly with time. This can be explained by the fact that NIMASTEP is a non-symplectic integration scheme and that the energy is not fully preserved. Hence, while both integrators turn out to be really efficient on short time scales, our symplectic integrator does not suffer from a slight drift on the semi-major axis on long time scales. Nevertheless, let us remark that NIMASTEP with time steps equal to 432 and 864 s yields excellent results, the drift on the semi-major axis being reasonably low after 190 years (8.4443 × 10−2 km and 2.9404 × 10−1 km respectively with times steps 432 and 864 s). One of the main advantages of our integrator is that it lets us obtain accurate results even with big time steps. As a comparison point, it turns out that the NIMASTEP software cannot be used with time steps larger than 1160 s for this particular set of initial conditions and perturbations. 4. Earth's shadow modelling The Earth's shadow can first be modeled as a simple cylinder. In this case, the Sun is assumed to be far enough from the Earth and the solar rays are then supposed to be parallel. The geometry of this problem is illustrated in Fig. 4 (top). However, a more realistic model includes the penumbra transition which lets us model partial eclipses (see Fig. 4, bottom). The distance to the Sun and diameters of both Earth and Sun have to be considered to compute the amount of sunlight actually reaching the space debris. In the following, we describe an existing method to model cylindrical shadows and present our solution (Section 4.1). Then, the same work is done in the case of penumbra transition models (Section 4.2). Finally, in Sec. 4.3, we compare our model to the solution of Montenbruck & Gill (2005) and we present an analysis of differences between orbits obtained with both our cylindrical and conical shadow models. 13 1152 s 1004 s 864 s 432 s 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0.7109 0.4739 0.237 0 7.8189 5.2126 2.6063 ] m k [ a ∆ e ∆ 0 x 10−6 0 11.3 0 x 10−6 ] d a r [ i ∆ 7.5333 3.7667 0 7.9 0 x 10−5 ] d a r [ Ω ∆ 5.2667 2.6333 0 3.47 0 x 10−4 ] d a r [ ω ∆ 2.3133 1.1567 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time [yr] 120 140 160 180 Figure 3: Comparison of the absolute difference between each Keplerian elements of the orbit obtained by our scheme and by the NIMASTEP software (with ABM10). Several time steps have been used with NIMASTEP: 432 s (green), 864 s (red), 1004.65 s (blue) and 1152 s (black). Initial conditions are a = 42164.140 km, e = 0.1 , i = 0.1 rad, Ω = ω = M = 0 rad. The model includes the geopotential up to degree and order 4, solar radiation pression (with A/m = 0.01 m2/kg) and luni-solar perturbations. The initial Julian date is 2455194.5 days. 14 r⊙ r⊙ !"# !"# !"#$% r r !"#$%&'$()#+,-') !"#$%&'( !"#$% α β !"#$% Figure 4: Top panel: cylindrical Earth shadow with solar rays assumed to be parallel when reaching the Earth. Bottom panel: Umbra-penumbra model including partial eclipses. Angles α and β give the geometric difference between the cylindrical and the conical models. 15 sc(r) := r · r⊙ r⊙ +qr2 − R2 ⊕ ≤ 0. (3) 4.1. Cylindrical shadow models In Escobal (1976), a method is proposed to find the orbital entrance and exit of a satellite from the shadow of the Earth. More precisely, two non- spurious roots of a quartic polynom in the cosine of the true anomaly corre- spond to the shadow entrance and exit (more details are given in Appendix A). Then the effect of the solar radiation pressure can be switched on and off, depending on the angular position of debris on its orbit. Unfortunately, it turns out that this shadow crossing model can not be put directly in the equations of motion, yielding numerical errors on short time scales. In order to avoid numerical errors in the integration process, it is necessary to find a smooth function ν(r) equal to one when debris are in direct sunlight and zero otherwise. Then, ∇rHsrp(r) can be multiplied by ν(r) in equations of motion so that each shadow crossing is taken into account. Starting from a preliminary relation in the model of Escobal (1976), it turns out that the satellite is situated in the cylindrical shadow of the Earth when We introduce a new shadow function defined as νc(r) = 1 2n1 + tanh[γ sc(r)]o =(cid:26) 1 in cylindrical umbra 0 otherwise where the constant γ has to be fixed according to the required precision. The shape of this function is shown for different values of γ in Fig. 5 (top). It can be seen that, the bigger γ, the sharper the function νc. As a matter of fact, a perfect cylindrical shadow model would require γ to be infinite. However, considering double precision floating point standard, Fig. 5 (bottom) shows that taking γ = 109 is sufficient to represent cylindrical shadow crossings. Indeed, the absolute difference between 1 and the function νc with sc(r) = 10−8 is already of order 10−9. As explained above, replacing ∇rHsrp(r) by νc(r)∇rHsrp(r) in equations of motion turns out to be an efficient way to use the fully symplectic integration scheme and consider cylindrical-shaped shadows of the Earth. In this case, a special attention has to be paid to the integration time step. The latter must be small enough to perform some steps inside the umbra zone, which only represents a small part of the total revolution time. As illustrated in Fig. 7, the cylindrical shadow on a geostationary orbit only lasts around half 16 γ=1 γ=10 γ=100 γ=1000 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 c ν 0 −0.2 −0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 s c 8 − 0 1 γ ) ) t ( h n a + 1 ( * 2 / 1 − 1 100 10−2 10−4 10−6 10−8 10−10 100 105 γ Figure 5: Top panel : evolution of the function νc for different values of sc and of the parameter γ. Bottom panel : absolute difference between one and the function νc evaluated at sc(r) = 10−8 for different values of the parameter γ. 17 an hour. While this drawback cannot be neglected, it also lets us to use low order symplectic integrators. In particular, the SBAB2 integrator is used when the shadowing effects are enabled, still keeping highly accurate results. 4.2. Conical shadow models Several attempts have been made to model the penumbra transition. A solution is proposed in Escobal (1976) to add umbra-penumbra corrections. Basically, one ends up with a more accurate but also trickier shadow function which still induces numerical errors in our symplectic integration scheme because the radiation pressure does not include Earth's shadow as a smooth function. Another kind of shadow crossing model can be found in Montenbruck & Gill (2005). In this case, a coefficient νM corresponds to the fraction of sunlight reaching the debris, based on the angular separation and diameters of the Sun and the Earth. Hence, νM is equal respectively to zero and one when the debris is in direct sunlight and umbra and corresponds to the remaining fraction of sunlight in the penumbra transition phase. It has to be noted that this fraction can only be defined in the penumbra cone. Hence, it is not possible to handle the function νM with a single formula at each time and it cannot be used directly within our symplectic scheme. Moreover, any stability study requiring the computation of the deviation vectors could not be used with this method, νM being a piecewise-defined function. Nevertheless, νM is kept back as a comparison criterion for our further developments. In the following, we present an innovative way of modelling umbra and penumbra cones crossings during the numerical integration of space debris orbit. First, we introduce angles α and β representing the difference between the umbra cylinder and respectively the umbra and penumbra cones (see Fig. 4) α = atan R⊙ − R⊕ kr − r⊙k and β = atan R⊙ + R⊕ kr − r⊙k with R⊙ the radius of the Sun. Extending relation (3), it follows that space debris are in the umbra cone when su(r) := r · r⊙ r⊙ + cos α(cid:20)qr2 − R2 ⊕ cos2 α + R⊕ sin α(cid:21) ≤ 0 18 Sunlight Penumbra Umbra s u s s c p ∆ t ∆ h x 10−3 2 s n o i t c n u f i g n z i r e t c a r a h C 1.5 1 0.5 0 −0.5 −1 −1.5 −2 0.935 0.94 0.945 Time [days] 0.95 Figure 6: Evolution of the functions sc, su and sp during a shadow crossing on a geo- stationary orbit. The penumbra cone is crossed when sp is negative and the space debris lays in the umbra cone while su is negative. The time spent in the penumbra transition is noted ∆t and the difference between su and sp at the entrance of the cylindrical shadow is denoted by ∆h. and in the penumbra cone when sp(r) := r · r⊙ r⊙ + cos β(cid:20)qr2 − R2 ⊕ cos2 β − R⊕ sin β(cid:21) ≤ 0. An example of the evolution of functions sc, su and sp depending on time is shown in Fig. 6. Now, we will show that the function νc can be adapted to include the penumbra transition. Actually, the parameter γ will not be constant anymore but will be chosen so that the new shadow function νp is equal to one in direct sunlight, starts to decrease in the penumbra cone and is equal to zero in the umbra cone. The value of 1 − νp when the penumbra cone is crossed has to be fixed to attain a given precision treshold, denoted σ. Hence, we define the constant δ := atanh (1 − σ). In this paper, δ is set equal to 8, meaning that the precision treshold σ ≃ 2.25 × 10−7. 19 Then, assuming that the time spent in the penumbra transition, ∆t, is known, γ is set equal to δ/∆t. With this configuration, νp(r) := is smooth and such that 1 2(cid:26)1 + tanh(cid:20) δ ∆t sc(r)(cid:21)(cid:27) (4) νp(r) = 1 if νp(r) = 1 − σ if σ ≤ νp(r) ≤ 1 − σ if νp(r) = σ if νp(r) = 0 if sp(r) > 0 sp(r) = 0 sp(r) ≤ 0 and su(r) > 0 su(r) = 0 su(r) ≤ 0 .   The main difficulty lies in the way to estimate ∆t. As a matter of fact, this quantity cannot be computed explicitely before each shadow crossing. However, we will show that it can be replaced by a quantity depending only on the position of the space debris. Both entrance and exit times spent in the penumbra cone being computed exactly in the same fashion, we will only explain our method in the entrance case. In following developments, each function sc, su and sp will be expressed as functions of the angle φ between r and r⊙. As a first step, we assume that r does not depend on φ, meaning that the orbit of the space debris is circular. It yields ⊕ sc(φ) = r cos φ +qr2 − R2 su(φ) = r cos φ + cos α(cid:20)qr2 − R2 sp(φ) = r cos φ + cos β(cid:20)qr2 − R2 ⊕ cos2 α + R⊕ sin α(cid:21) ⊕ cos2 β − R⊕ sin β(cid:21) . (5) (6) (7) Let us also define φ1, φ2 and φ3 respectively as the value of φ at the entrance the cylindrical shadow, umbra and penumbra cones. Hence, the following relations hold: sc(φ1) = su(φ2) = sp(φ3) = 0. (8) The difference (∆φ) between φ2 and φ3 will help us to characterize ∆t. Tech- nical details about the computation of ∆φ are given in Appendix B. It turns out that it can be approximated by ∆φ := φ2 − φ3 ≃ 2ρ R⊙ r . 20 (9) where ρ := r/r⊙. Moreover, the link between ∆φ and ∆t can be expressed as ∆φ = φ∆t ≃ 2π day ∆t. (10) (11) Hence, ∆t ≃ ∆φ 2π day ≃ ρR⊙ πr day. The final step is to show that the difference between su and sp at the entrance of the cylindrical shadow, denoted by ∆h, can be used instead of ∆t. Simple calculations let us write down ∆h as ∆h = 2ρR⊕ R⊙ r (12) Full details about this relation are to be found in Appendix C. In conclusion, we have shown that ∆t can be approximated as ∆t ≃ ∆h R⊕2π . From a geometrical point of view, our approximation means that the slope of each curve su, sc and sp is close to −1 at the shadow entrance and to 1 at the shadow exit with our particular choice of units. The same mathematical development can be achieved in the case of non- circular space debris orbits (r depends on the angle φ). The calculations are presented in Appendix D. Going back to equation (4), it is easily seen that we now have νp(r) = 1 2(cid:26)1 + tanh(cid:20)δ2πR⊕ ∆h(r) sc(r)(cid:21)(cid:27) (13) Let us remark that, in practice, ∆h is computed with actual values of α and β : ∆h(r) = su(r) − sp(r) = cos α(r)hpr2 − R2 − cos β(r)hpr2 − R2 ⊕ cos2 α(r) + R⊕ sin α(r)i ⊕ cos2 β(r) − R⊕ sin β(r)i . Also note that, with α = β = 0, νp is equal to νc. 21 Sunlight Penumbra Umbra ν c ν p ν M 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 ν n o i t c n u f w o d a h S 0 0.935 0.94 0.945 Time [days] 0.95 0.955 Figure 7: Typical shadow crossing on a geostationary orbit. This figure shows the com- parison between three shadow crossing models, as a function of time. 4.3. Numerical comparisons First, we compare our shadow functions to the one proposed in Mon- tenbruck & Gill (2005). It is interesting to study the shape of these functions on a single shadow crossing. Considering a geostationary orbit, we show the evolution of νu, νp and νM during a typical shadow crossing in Fig. 7. Even if the shapes of νp and νM are different, both share some common properties. It can be seen that both shadow functions cross the cylindrical shadow limit at νu = νp = νM ≃ 0.5, start to decrease when entering the penumbra cone, are equal to zero in the umbra cone and increase again in the penumbra exit transition. A numerical comparison based on several shadow crossings is proposed later on. Short-periodic effects of Earth's cylindrical shadows on the orbital ele- ments of space debris have already been studied in Valk & Lemaıtre (2008). For example, the evolution of the semi-major axis and eccentricity for space debris disturbed by the solar radiation pressure and an area-to-mass ratio equal to 5 m2/kg is described in Valk & Lemaıtre (2008) (Fig. 3). The same simulation has been performed in Fig 8 with our conical shadow model. At first glance, it is not possible to detect significant discrepancies. Nevertheless, both shadow models clearly lead to significantly different 22 x 104 4.2174 ] m k [ a 4.2167 4.2159 4.2152 0 0.1102 0.0734 0.0367 e 0 0 0.0194 ] d a r [ i 0.0129 0.0065 0 0 6.2695 4.1797 2.0898 0 0 ] d a r [ Ω 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 6.2828 ] d a r [ ω 4.1885 2.0943 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Time [yr] 3 3.5 4 4.5 Figure 8: Evolution of Keplerian elements of the orbit of space debris subject to the Earth's central attraction and solar radiation pressure. The initial semi-major axis is set at 42164 km, the other elements are set equal to zero and the area-to-mass ratio is equal to 5 m2/kg. The shadow function νp is used to model the Earth's shadowing effects. The results are in agreement with what is proposed in Fig. 3 in Valk & Lemaıtre (2008). 23 debris trajectories. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the absolute difference between orbital elements obtained with both models is zero before the first shadow season and starts to increase after this period of time. A shadow season appears each time that the Sun moves through the orbital plane of motion, leading to a succession of shadow crossings. More information about such phenomena can be found in Valk & Lemaıtre (2008). The area-to-mass ratio is equal to 20 m2/kg for this example. After 15 years, the difference between both trajectories keeps on increasing and reaches high values, especially for the semi-major axis (see Fig. 10, blue curve). In light of this, it turns out that cylindrical shadow models are not reliable approximations of conical Earth's shadows, especially in the case of space debris with high area-to-mass ratios. The altitude of space debris trajectory must also be considered, the higher the orbit, the larger the time spent in the penumbra transition. In Fig. 10, the results obtained with both shadow functions νp and νM are represented by the red curve. Given that νM cannot be used with our sym- plectic scheme, it has been included in NIMASTEP in order to perform the comparison between both methods. Differences between Keplerian elements in this case are clearly smaller than in the previous comparison involving νc and νp (Fig. 10, blue curve). Moreover, this difference between both conical shadow models does not increase linearly with time. By way of conclusion, debris trajectories obtained with our symplectic integrator coupled to our smooth shadow function turn out to be consistent with the ones computed by NIMASTEP (ABM10) using νM. Eventually, a last remark is given about the energy conservation in the case of cylindrical and conical shadow models. The comments about the quasi- symplecticity are, of course, the same for the solar radiation pressure than for the third body contributions. Hence, we are still limited in the computation of the relative variation of the energy. However, it is shown in Fig 11 that the relative error in energy does not increase with time, even on an extremely long time span (5000 years). Let us remark that the energy computed takes into account the contribution of the solar radiation pressure with permanent sunlight. Indeed, the part of the Hamiltonian function corresponding to the solar radiation pressure cannot be retrieved from the equations of motion νu,p(r) ∇rHsrp(r, θ) , the latter being impossible to integrate analytically. A close look to the relative error in energy shows small perturbations during each shadow season but it does not result in a long term drift on the energy. 24 0.119 ] m k [ a ∆ 0.0793 0.0397 e ∆ 0 5.6468 3.7645 1.8823 0 6.682 ] d a r [ i ∆ 4.4547 2.2273 0 7.5162 5.0108 2.5054 0 7.9571 5.3047 2.6524 ] d a r [ Ω ∆ ] d a r [ ω ∆ 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 x 10−6 0 x 10−7 0 x 10−5 0 x 10−5 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Time [yr] 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Figure 9: Absolute difference between the orbital elements of space debris subject to the Earth's central attraction and solar radiation pressure with νc and νp shadow functions. The initial semi-major axes are 42164 km, the other elements are set equal to zero and the area-to-mass ratio is equal to 20 m2/kg. This figure emphasizes the beginning of the difference between both orbits after the first shadow season represented by the gray zone. 25 13.1057 ] m k [ a ∆ 8.7371 4.3686 e ∆ 0 1.9182 1.2788 0.6394 0 6.1912 0 x 10−4 0 x 10−5 ] d a r [ i ∆ 4.1275 2.0637 0 x 10−4 0 3.5951 2.3968 1.1984 0 0 0.0145 0.0097 0.0048 0 0 ] d a r [ Ω ∆ ] d a r [ ω ∆ Comparison ν Comparison ν p − ν p − ν c M 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 15 15 15 15 15 Time [yr] Figure 10: Absolute difference between the orbital elements of space debris subject to the Earth's central attraction and solar radiation pressure with respectively νp and νc shadow functions (in blue) and νp and νM functions (in red). The orbit with νM has been computed by NIMASTEP (ABM10). The initial semi-major axes are 42164 km, the other elements are set equal to zero and the area-to-mass ratio is equal to 20 m2/kg. Each numerical integration has been performed with time steps equal to 150 s. 26 y g r e n e n i r o r r e e v i t l a e R x 10−6 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1000 2000 Time [yr] 3000 4000 5000 Figure 11: Evolution of the relative error in energy of space debris motion subject to solar radiation pressure. The initial semi-major axis is set at 42164 km, the other elements are set equal to zero and the area-to-mass ratio is equal to 0.1 m2/kg. The shadow function νp is used to model the Earth's shadowing effects. 5. Conclusion An efficient symplectic integration scheme has been presented in order to compute space debris motion. The underlying algorithm has been described and the accuracy of the integrator has been demonstrated by means of nu- merical comparisons. It has been pointed out that large time steps could be used and that the relative error in energy was not increasing with time, even on huge time spans. It should also be mentioned that our method is not stuck to one particular order and that it can adapted to the complexity of the perturbations and to the desired precision. Our integration scheme is able to take into account the Earth's gravitational potential, luni-solar and planetary gravitational perturbations and solar radiation pressure. In conclusion, it turns out that our algorithm represents a fast and reliable al- ternative to compute space debris or artificial satellites orbits, especially on long time scales. We have also described an innovative method to model both cylindrical and conical Earth's shadow crossings by means of smooth shadow functions. We have explained why these ones were particulary convenient in the frame- work of symplectic integration. It has been shown that the cylindrical model was not a suitable approximation of conical shadows, especially in the case of space debris associated to high area-to-mass ratios. It has been noticed that one drawback of the computation of the shadow functions during the integration process relies in the obligation to reduce step sizes. Even if it can 27 be considered as a limitation, one has to keep in mind that the order of the integrator can be reduced in order to speed up the calculations. Future work will be devoted to stability studies involving shadowing ef- fects. Such a task will be made easier by the fact that our shadow function derivatives are also smooth, enabling us to compute direclty the solutions of the variational equations. These relations are necessary to use chaos indica- tors like the MEGNO (Cincotta et al., 2003). Hence we will be able to extend the work realized in Valk et al. (2009) by considering Earth's shadows. Acknowledgements The work of Ch. Hubaux is supported by an FNRS PhD Fellowship. The authors would like to thank A. Rossi for helpful discussions and interactions. Numerical simulations were made on the local computing resources (Cluster iSCF) at the University of Namur (FUNDP, Belgium). Appendix A. Orbital entrance and exit from the Earth's shadow In Escobal (1976), the entrance and exit true anomalies from the Earth's shadows are found to be the non-spurious solutions of the following function R2 ⊕(1 + e cos f )2 + p2(β cos f + ξ sin f )2 − p2 = 0 (A.1) where f is the true anomaly, p = a(1−e2) is the semi-latus rectum and β and ξ depend on the geocentric Cartesian position of the Sun and the inclination and longitude of the ascending node of the debris. As explained in Escobal (1976), relation (A.1) corresponds to a quartic polynom in the cosine of the true anomaly. Hence, this function is transformed to standard form to find a new quartic polynom in f which is solved in closed form by quadratic radicals (see Descartes' rule presented in Escobal (1976)). The introduction of equinoctial elements ke = e cos(Ω + ω) and he = e sin(Ω + ω) has been proposed in Valk & Lemaıtre (2008) to avoid singular orbital elements. It yields the following function R2 ⊕(1 + ke cos f + he sin f )2 + p2(β cos f + ξ sin f )2 − p2 = 0 (A.2) whose solutions are found using the so-called resultant method (see Gronchi 2005 for an application example) . The latter lets us solve analytically the problem as a system of two algebraic equations in two variables. 28 We hereby propose a further improvement in the computation of the so- lutions of (A.2). By defining T := tan(f /2), (A.2) can be written as R2 ⊕(cid:18)1 + ke 1 − T 2 1 + T 2 + ξ 1 − T 2 1 + T 2 + he 1 + T 2(cid:19)2 2T +p2(cid:18)β 2T 1 + T 2(cid:19)2 − p2 = 0 or, equivalently, eR2 ⊕] ⊕ − 2keR2 T 4[p2β2 − p2 + R2 ⊕ + k2 ⊕ − 4hekeR2 + T 3[−4βξp2 + 4heR2 ⊕] + T 2[4ξ2p2 − 2p2β2 − 2p2 + 4h2 eR2 ⊕ + 2R2 + T [4βξp2 + 4heR2 ⊕ + 4hekeR2 ⊕] ⊕ + k2 + [p2β2 − p2 + R2 = 0 ⊕ + 2keR2 eR2 ⊕] ⊕ − 2k2 eR2 ⊕] Descartes' rule can then be used to find orbital entrance and exit true anomalies. The advantage of this method is twofold. First, the use of the tangent function directly indicates the right quadrant for the true anomaly. Then, the resultant method is not necessary anymore. Appendix B. Computation of ∆φ Relation (8) tells us that cos φ2 + cos α"r1 − cos φ3 + cos β"r1 − ⊕ R2 r2 cos2 α + R⊕ r ⊕ R2 r2 cos2 β − R⊕ r sin α# = 0 sin β# = 0. (B.1) (B.2) Then, we denote by ρ the small quantity r/r⊙. simplified expression It leads to the following kr − r⊙k2 r2 ⊙ = 1 − 2ρ cos φ + ρ2 ≃ 1 − 2ρ cos φ 29 where the small term ρ2 has been neglected. Further calculations lead to the following expressions, keeping only terms of order ρ : sin α ≃ tan α ≃ ρ sin β ≃ tan β ≃ ρ R⊙ − R⊕ r R⊙ + R⊕ r and cos α ≃ 1 (B.3) and cos β ≃ 1. (B.4) Replacing (B.3) and (B.4) values in (B.1) and (B.2), one obtains cos φ2 +r1 − cos φ3 +r1 − By (B.5) and (B.6), we get ⊕ R2 r2 + ρR⊕ R2 r2 − ρR⊕ ⊕ R⊙ − R⊕ r2 R⊙ + R⊕ r2 = 0 = 0. (B.5) (B.6) cos φ3 − cos φ2 = 2ρ R⊕R⊙ r2 . Eventually, it can be shown that ∆φ := φ2 − φ3 = 2ρ R⊙ r + O(ρ(φ − φ2)2) (B.7) where φ − φ2 is small at the shadow entrance. Appendix C. Computation of ∆h At the cylindrical shadow entrance, the angle φ is equal to φ1. From (6) and (7), one obtains su(φ1) = r cos φ1 + cos α(cid:20)qr2 − R2 sp(φ1) = r cos φ1 + cos β(cid:20)qr2 − R2 ⊕ cos2 α + R⊕ sin α(cid:21) ⊕ cos2 β − R⊕ sin β(cid:21) . Then, from (B.3) and (B.4), it follows that su(φ1) = r cos φ1 +qr2 − R2 ⊕ + R⊕ρ R⊙ − R⊕ r + O(ρ2) 30 sp(φ1) = r cos φ1 +qr2 − R2 Eventually, (8) yields ⊕ − R⊕ρ R⊙ + R⊕ r + O(ρ2). su(φ1) = R⊕ρ sp(φ1) = −R⊕ρ R⊙ − R⊕ r R⊙ + R⊕ r + O(ρ2) + O(ρ2). In conclusion, we can write ∆h = su(φ1) − sp(φ1) ≃ 2ρR⊕ R⊙ r . Appendix D. Computation of ∆t in the non-circular case The only difference with the circular case is given by the dependence of r on φ. Expressing r in terms of Keplerian elements, one has r(φ) = a(1 − e2) 1 + e cos f (φ) where f is the true anomaly. Expanding this relation (see e.g. Murray & Dermott 1999) and keeping only terms of first order in eccentricity, r can be finally written as r(φ) ≃ a(1 − e cos M(φ)) = a(1 − e cos(φ + ψ0)) where M is the mean anomaly and ψ0 is the appropriate phasing. Following the same scheme as for the circular case, we end up with ∆t = ρR⊙ aπ (1 + e cos(φ + ψ0)) + O(ρ2e + ρe2 + ρ2e2) days and ∆h = 2ρR⊕R⊙ a (1 + e cos(φ + ψ0)) + O(ρ2e + ρe2 + ρ2e2). 31 References Aksnes, K., Short-period and long-period perturbations of a spherical satel- lite due to direct solar radiation, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 13, 89-104, 1976. Anselmo, L. & Pardini C., Orbital evolution of geosynchronous objects with high area-to-mass ratios. In: Danesy, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-587, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 279284, 2005. Bourbaki, N., El´ements de Math´ematiques: Groupes et Alg`ebres de Lie Her- mann Ed. (Paris, 1972). Breiter, S., Wytrzyszczak, I. & Melendo, B., Long-term predictability of orbits around the geosynchronous altitude, Adv. Space Res., 35, 1313- 1317, 2005. Chao, C.C., Analytical Investigation of GEO Debris with High Area-to- mass Ratio, AIAA paper No. AIAA-2006-6514, Presented at the 2006 AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 2006. Chao, C.C., Applied orbit perturbation and maintenance, The Aerospace Press (El Segundo, California, American Institute of Aeronautics and As- tronautics, 2005). Cincotta, P., Giordano, C. & Sim´o, C., Phase space structure of multi- dimensional systems by means of the mean exponential growth factor of nearby orbits, Physica D, 182, 151-178, 2003. Cunningham, L.E., On the computation of the spherical harmonic terms needed during the numerical integration of the orbital motion of an artifical satellite, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 2, 207-216, 1970. Delsate, N. & Comp`ere, A., NIMASTEP: a software to modelize, study and analyze the dynamics of various small objects orbiting specific bodies, Sub- mitted for publication 2011, arXiv:1112.1304v1 [astro-ph.EP] Escobal, P.R., Methods of orbit determination, Krieger Publishing, 2nd edi- tion (Florida, 1976). 32 Ferraz-Mello, S., Sur le probl`eme de la pression de radiation dans la th´eorie des Satellites Artificiels, C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, 258, 463, 1964 Ferraz-Mello, S., Action de la Pression de radiation sur le mouvement d'un satellite artificiel de la terre, Proc. 14th Intl. Astronaut. Congress - Paris, 1963, Vol. IV, PWN, Warsaw, 41, 1965. Ferraz-Mello, S., Analytical study of the Earth's shadowing effects on satellite orbits, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 5, 80-101, 1972. Gronchi, G.F., An algebraic method to compute the critical points of the dis- tance function between two Keplerian orbits, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 93, 295-329, 2005. Hairer, E., Norsett, S., & Wanner, G., Solving ordinary differential equations I: Nonstiff problems, Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition (New-York, 1993). Kozai, Y., Effects of solar radiation pressure on the motion of an artificial satellite, Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep, 56, 25-33, 1961. L´ala, P. & Sehnal, L., The Earth's shadowing effects in the short-periodic perturbations of satellite orbits, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 20, 327, 1969. Laskar, J. & Robutel, P., High order symplectic integrators for perturbed Hamiltonian systems, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 80, 39-62, 2001. Lemaıtre, A., Delsate, N. & Valk, S., A web of secondary resonances for large A/m geostationary debris, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 104, 383-402, 2009 Lemoine, F.G., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K., et al., The development of the joint nasa gsfc and nima geopotential model EGM96. Tech. Rep., NASA, TP-1998-206861, 1987. Liou, J.-C. & Weaver, J.K. Orbital dynamics of high area-to-mass ratio debris and their distribution in the geosynchronous region. In: Danesy, D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP- 589, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 285290, 2005. Milani, A. & Gronchi, G., Theory of orbit determination, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1st edition (2009). 33 Montenbruck, O. & Gill, E., Satellite orbits: models, methods, and applica- tions, Springer (2005). Murray, C.D. & Dermott, S.F., Solar system dynamics, Cambridge University Press (1999). Schildknecht, T., Fruh, C., Herzog, A., Hinze, J. & Vananti, A., AIUB Efforts to Survey, Track, and Characterize Small-Size Objects at High Altitudes, Proceedings of 2010 AMOS Technical Conference, 14-17 September, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2010. Standish, E.M., JPL planetary and lunar ephemeris, DE405/LE405, JPL Interoffice Memorandum IOM 312.D-98-048, 1998. Valk, S., Lemaıtre, A. & Anselmo, L., Analytical and semi-analytical investi- gations of geosynchronous space debris with high area-to-mass ratios, Adv. Space Res., 41, 1077-1090, 2008. Valk, S. & Lemaıtre, A., Semi-analytical investigations of high area-to-mass ratio geosynchronous space debris including Earth's shadowing effects, Adv. Space Res., 42, 1429-1443, 2008. Valk, S., Delsate, N., Lemaıtre, A. & Carletti, T., Global dynamics of high area-to-mass ratios GEO space debris by means of the MEGNO indicator, Adv. Space Res., 43, 1509-1526, 2009. Vokrouhlicky, D., Farinella, P. & Mignard, F., Solar radiation pressure per- turbations for Earth satellites. I. A complete theory including penumbra transitions, A&A, 280, 295-312, 1993. Vokrouhlicky, D., Farinella, P. & Mignard, F., Solar radiation pressure perturbations for Earth satellites. II. An approximate method to model penumbra transitions and their long-term orbital effects on LAGEOS, A&A, 285, 333-343, 1994a. Vokrouhlicky, D., Farinella, P. & Mignard, F., Solar radiation pressure per- turbations for Earth satellites. III. Global atmospheric phenomena and the albedo effect, A&A, 290, 324-334, 1994b. Vokrouhlicky, D., Farinella, P. & Mignard, F., Solar radiation pressure per- turbations for Earth satellites. IV. Effects of the Earth's polar flattening on 34 the shadow structure and the penumbra transitions, A&A, 307, 635-644, 1996. 35
1106.3145	4	1106	2015-04-02T08:46:27	The Gravitational instability of solids assisted by gas drag: slowing by turbulent mass diffusivity	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	The Goldreich and Ward (1973) (axisymmetric) gravitational instability of a razor thin particle layer occurs when the Toomre parameter $Q_T \equiv c_p \Omega_0 / \pi G \Sigma_p < 1$ ($c_p$ being the particle dispersion velocity). Ward(1976,2000) extended this analysis by adding the effect of gas drag upon particles and found that even when $Q_T > 1$, sufficiently long waves were always unstable. Youdin (2005a,b) carried out a detailed analysis and showed that the instability allows chondrule-sized ($\sim 1 $ mm) particles to undergo radial clumping with reasonable growth times even in the presence of a moderate amount of turbulent stirring. The analysis of Youdin includes the role of turbulence in setting the thickness of the dust layer and in creating a turbulent particle pressure in the momentum equation. However, he ignores the effect of turbulent mass diffusivity on the disturbance wave. Here we show that including this effect reduces the growth-rate significantly, by an amount that depends on the level of turbulence, and reduces the maximum intensity of turbulence the instability can withstand by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude. The instability is viable only when turbulence is extremely weak and the solid to gas surface density of the particle layer is considerably enhanced over minimum-mass-nebula values. A simple mechanistic explanation of the instability shows how the azimuthal component of drag promotes instability while the radial component hinders it. A gravito-diffusive overstability is also possible but never realized in the nebula models.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Gravitational instability of solids assisted by gas drag: slowing by turbulent mass diffusivity Karim Shariff and Jeffrey N. Cuzzi NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (Accepted, June 14, 2011, Astrophysical Journal) ABSTRACT The Goldreich and Ward (1973) (axisymmetric) gravitational instability of a razor thin particle layer occurs when the Toomre parameter QT ≡ cpΩ0/πGΣp < 1 (cp being the particle dispersion velocity). Ward (1976, 2000) extended this analysis by adding the effect of gas drag upon particles and found that even when QT > 1, sufficiently long waves were always unstable. Youdin (2005a,b) carried out a detailed analysis and showed that the instability allows chondrule-sized (∼ 1 mm) particles to undergo radial clumping with reasonable growth times even in the presence of a moderate amount of turbulent stirring. The analysis of Youdin includes the role of turbulence in setting the thickness of the dust layer and in creating a turbulent particle pressure in the momentum equation. However, he ignores the effect of turbulent mass diffusivity on the disturbance wave. Here we show that including this effect reduces the growth-rate significantly, by an amount that depends on the level of turbulence, and reduces the maximum intensity of turbulence the instability can withstand by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude. The instability is viable only when turbulence is extremely weak and the solid to gas surface density of the particle layer is considerably enhanced over minimum-mass- nebula values. A simple mechanistic explanation of the instability shows how the azimuthal component of drag promotes instability while the radial component hinders it. A gravito-diffusive overstability is also possible but never realized in the nebula models. Subject headings: Protoplanetary Disks; Stars: Planetary Systems 1. Introduction 1.1. Preliminary Remarks It is believed that clumping of solid material to form the terrestrial planets and the putative cores of gas giants involved three stages. The first and third stages are relatively -- 2 -- well understood. First, grains that survived shocked entry into the solar nebula and those that condensed from the cooling gas, collided and stuck by van der Waals attraction; such a process is considerably speeded up by turbulence but is still effective in laminar disks (Weidenschilling 1980, 1984; Dullemond and Dominik 2005) and is able to form cm-or-larger sized particles. Thereafter, growth by binary accretion becomes problematic in a turbulent nebula due to shattering. In the third stage, planetesimals, bodies 1 km and larger which are akin to the present day asteroids, merged in binary fashion by physical and/or gravitational capture as they collided (Kokubo and Ida 2000; Chambers 2001; Kenyon and Bromley 1993). Least understood is the middle stage, namely, the growth from cm to km-sized bodies. Early on Safronov (1972) and Goldreich and Ward (1973)(henceforth collectively referred to as SGW) independently suggested that particles settled to the midplane and underwent a gravitational instability (GI). This caused clumps of some characteristic size to contract until centrifugal force became strong enough to balance self-gravity. Goldreich and Ward (1973) suggested that bodies of size . 0.5 km having the density of solid material could form in this way on a dynamical timescale. The SGW scenario ignored the presence of global turbulence in the solar nebula which stabilizes the dust layer against gravitational instability by making the basic state particle layer more diffuse and introducing a turbulent pressure into the particle dynamics. A pos- sible source of disk turbulence is magneto-rotational instability (MRI). It has been argued (Gammie 1996) that MRI may be confined to only the upper layers of a disk which are sufficiently ionized by cosmic rays. Nevertheless, this does not imply a completely quiescent mid-plane since vortical eddies in the unstable layers can induce fluctuations at the mid- plane. Dullemond and Dominik (2004) found that laminar settling of dust grains could not account for the observed flaring of disks suggesting that turbulence is keeping small particles aloft throughout the disk height. Even if one discounts global turbulence, an obstacle to the SGW picture of midplane GI remains: the dust disk itself can generate turbulence. The gas component feels a small outward directed pressure force and therefore rotates at a slightly slower speed than the Keplerian speed of solid particles. This creates an Ekman-like layer whose density strat- ification is not strong enough to stabilize the layer. The turbulent state is such that the critical particle density required for the mid-plane gravitational instability is not realized (Weidenschilling 1980, 1984; Cuzzi et al. 1993). A variant of midplane gravitational instability involves suppression of turbulence in the mixed particle-gas layer by the vertical density gradient. This variant is valid only for very small particles, which are so well trapped to the gas that the particle-gas mixture behaves as a single fluid. In this limit, Sekiya (1998) calculated the (mean) vertical structure -- 3 -- of the turbulent dust layer by assuming that the mean profiles of density and velocity lie at the instability/stability boundary, i.e., characterized by a Richardson number equal to its critical value of 1/4. He found that if the ratio of solid to gas surface density in the disk is much larger than the cosmic value, the layer achieves the critical density needed for GI. This type of analysis produces a cusp at the midplane in the mean density profile as the surface density of solids in the disk is increased. Youdin and Shu (2002) and later Youdin and Chiang (2004) studied this situation further, suggesting that the cusp was not a mathematical artifact but indicative of the inability of the turbulence to stir up particles near the midplane. They proposed that the required enrichment of solids could occur as particles drift inward by gas drag. Garaud and Lin (2004) studied the Richardson number instability as the particle layer slowly settles. They also find (their Fig. 11) that, at the levels of the pressure force appropriate to a minimum mass nebula, gravitational instability sets in before the Richardson number instability only if the column density of particles is ≈ 1/5 the column density of the gas; this represents a factor of ≈ 30 increase over the minimum-mass- nebula model, in agreement with previous works. Because of the small particle limitation, this variant of midplane GI is precluded by even the faintest breath of global turbulence (Cuzzi and Weidenschilling 2006). Alternate scenarios of growth in dense midplane layers, which do not rely on grav- itational instabilities, have been developed by Weidenschilling in a number of papers (see Weidenschilling 2000, for a review). A review of this stage is given by Cuzzi and Weidenschilling (2006) and recent work (Cuzzi et al. 2001; Johansen et al. 2006) suggests that the problem is more complex than envisioned in the early works. 1.2. The gas-drag mediated instability The subject of the present work is a gravitationally driven instability made possible by gas drag. What makes the instability interesting is that, although it is relatively slow, it is unconditional. The instability was proposed and studied by Ward (1976, 2000) in the absence of turbulence and associated particle dispersion. Safronov (1987, 1991) also briefly considers this instability under the same conditions and writes down the dispersion relation in the limit where particle stopping time is short compared to the time scale of the perturbation. A detailed analysis (Youdin 2005a,b, henceforth papers I and II) suggested that the gas-drag assisted instability remains viable in the presence of a moderate amount of nebula turbulence. This analysis included the effect of turbulence in the particle momentum equation (via an effective pressure) and in setting the height of the disk layer. However, a turbulent diffusion term must also be present in the equation for particle mass conservation. Here we correct -- 4 -- this omission and find significant reductions in growth-rate. In particular, we find that the instability is not viable for nominal values of nebula turbulence unless favorable assumptions are made regarding local conditions. These include some combination of elevated solid/gas ratio, and particle size neither too small nor too large. During review of the revised version of this paper, we were sent a new paper, Youdin (2011), that also corrects for the lack of turbulent mass diffusivity in the 2005 papers. In addition, it uses updated models for the radial turbulent diffusivity of particles, the radial particle dispersion, and the height of the particle sub-disk. These models are based on the analysis of Youdin and Lithwick (2007) and the corrections they imply become important for particles whose stopping times ts non-dimensionalized by the orbital frequency Ω0 are such that τs ≡ Ωts & 1. The present calculations were therefore redone to incorporate the newer models, however, the basic conclusions remained the same. 2. Analysis 2.1. Dispersion Relation When a mass diffusion term with coefficient D is included, the linearized and vertically integrated mass and momentum equations for the particles, equations (6) and (7) in paper I, become + = D ∂u ∂x ∂σ ∂t ∂u ∂t − 2vΩ0 = − + (2 − q)uΩ0 = − ∂2σ ∂x2 , ∂χ ∂x − v , ts u ts , (1) (2) (3) ∂v ∂t where q ≡ 3/2. The equations are written relative to a box at radius R revolving at the local angular velocity RΩ(R) of particles; we have defined Ω0 ≡ Ω(R). Affixed to the box are local Cartesian coordinates (x, y), where x is radial and y is azimuthal. The corresponding velocity components are (u, v): they represent turbulent mean quantities that have then been vertically averaged. The quantity σ is the relative perturbation in particle surface density defined so that: Σ = Σp (1 + σ) , (4) where Σp and Σ are the basic state and total (basic state + perturbation) surface densities, respectively. Throughout the analysis used to obtain (1) -- (3), one assumes that Σp is locally uniform and can therefore be freely moved into and out of x and y derivatives. The basic -- 5 -- state velocity of particles has been taken to be Keplerian in deriving (1) -- (3). The gas flow has also been taken to be Keplerian and is left unperturbed. In this model therefore, there is only one-way coupling from the gas to the particles. (One consequence of two-way coupling are streaming instabilities, e.g., Youdin and Goodman (2005)). Figure 3 (lower) in Cuzzi et al. (1993) shows that the turbulent mean flow departs from being Keplerian by only about 0.2%. The basic state flow of the particles should also have an inward radial drift arising from gas drag (Adachi et al. 1976); this has been left out in (1) -- (3). However, since the (vertically averaged) drift velocity is locally uniform with respect to x and y, it would cause the instability wave to merely drift inward without affecting its local growth-rate. Effects that involve the fact that the drift velocity has a vertical dependence are not included in the analysis. We found (except for the gravito-diffusive mode that was never realized in the nebula calculations) that the phase and group velocity of the instability wave is zero in the drifting frame. This comes about simply because the wave oscillation frequency is zero in some neighborhood of the most amplified wavenumber. Thus, the wave drift speed is the same as the particle drift speed and this will limit the total amount of wave growth. This is accounted for in the study by comparing the e-folding growth time to a local drift time scale tdrift = R/udrift. (5) Complete loss of solids from the entire nebula is a weaker constraint. Axisymmetric disturbances are being considered. Thus, the only spatial derivatives that appear are those with respect to the radial coordinate x. The quantity χ ≡ Φ + Π′ consists of the gravitational potential Φ and Π′ ≡ σc2 p which arises from modeling the effect of turbulence on particle momentum by an effective pressure, cp being the radial particle dispersion velocity (Youdin and Lithwick 2007). The effective pressure term arises from the rr component of the particle Reynolds stress tensor in the Reynolds-averaged particle momentum equation. It should be noted that neither the present treatment nor that of Youdin (2011) has incorporated all the effects of turbulence in the particle momentum equation. A Reynolds average of the original equation reveals that, in addition to an effective pressure, several other turbulent correlations arise that require closure models. Compared to previous treatments (Ward 2000; Youdin 2005a,b) the only new term is the right hand side of (1) and represents turbulent diffusion of surface density. This term arises from the correlation (cid:10)ρ′u′ equation (the primes denote turbulent fluctuations and the angle brackets denote a suitable Reynolds average). This has been modeled using gradient diffusion as −D∂ρ/∂xj . j(cid:11) in the Reynolds averaged particle mass conservation Substituting into equations (1)-(3) perturbations of the form (σ, u, v) = (bσ,bu,bv)ei(kx−ωt), (6) where (bσ,bu,bv) are complex constants, gives a linear homogeneous system (7) -- 6 -- A(bσ,bu,bv)T = 0, where A is a matrix. The solvability condition for this system, namely, that the determinant of A vanish, gives the dispersion relation: (ω + i/ts)(cid:2)C(k) − (ω + iDk2)(ω + i/ts)(cid:3) + iΩ2 0(Dk2 − t−1 s ) = 0, where C(k) ≡ Ω2 0 + k2c2 p − 2πGΣpkT (khp). (8) (9) Here hp is the height of the particle sub-disk and T (khp) = 1/(1 + khp) is a factor that approximates finite thickness effects on the potential of self-gravity in the context of a ver- tically integrated model. In the limit ts → ∞ (vanishing drag) and D → 0, (8) reduces to the Safronov-Goldreich-Ward (SGW) form ω2 = C(k). Since turbulent mass diffusivity occurs only in the product Dk2, its effect is arbitrarily small for sufficiently long waves. However, the most amplified wave has a finite k and therefore turbulent mass diffusivity has a non-negligible effect on growth-rate. Following Youdin (2005a) let us introduce the non-dimensional variables γ ≡ −iω/Ω0, κ ≡ πGΣpk/Ω2 0, τs ≡ Ω0ts, and the Toomre and Roche parameters QT ≡ cpΩ0 πGΣp , QR ≡ hpΩ2 0 πGΣp . (10) (11) The additional parameter resulting in the present case is the non-dimensional diffusivity: DΩ3 0 (πGΣp)2 . (12) bD ≡ The quantity Re(γ) gives the growth-rate and the parameter QR is present only because finite thickness effects on self-gravity have been retained. The dispersion relation (8) may then be written as: where (cid:0)γ + τ −1 s (cid:1)hF +(cid:16)γ + bDκ2(cid:17)(cid:0)γ + τ −1 s (cid:1)i + bDκ2 − τ −1 s = 0, F (κ, QT, QR) ≡ 1 − 2κ 1 + κQR + Q2 Tκ2. (13) (14) -- 7 -- for the γ: As can be checked, the condition F < 0 gives instability in the limit of zero gas drag (τs → ∞) and zero mass diffusivity (bD → 0). Equation (13) expands to the following cubic equation γ3 +(cid:16)2τ −1 s (cid:1) = 0. (15) s (cid:17) γ + τ −1 (F − 1) + bDκ2(cid:0)1 + τ −2 s + bDκ2(cid:17) γ2 +(cid:16)τ −2 s + F + 2bDκ2τ −1 Using Descartes' rule of signs and clever reasoning, Youdin (2005a) concluded that a nec- essary and sufficient condition for instability (for the case of zero mass diffusivity) is that F (κ, QT, QR) − 1 < 0. A similar analysis does not appear to be possible in the present case. However, Youdin (2011) has shown that, even with mass diffusivity, one can always find a wavenumber κ such that the system is unstable. s The slow instabilities considered are such that the growth-rates can be much smaller than the particle stopping rate, i.e., γ ≪ 1/τs. In this limit, an explicit expression is obtained for the growth-rate from (13): γapprox = τs(1 − F ) − bDκ2(cid:0)τ 2 s + 1(cid:1) , (16) which clearly shows the damping effect of bD. The validity of (16) can be checked a posteriori. 2.2. Implementation To implement the analysis for various disk conditions we follow exactly the treatment of papers I and II updated with the models in Youdin (2011) for the effect of turbulence on particles. Defining ≡ R/AU, the nebula model employed is Σg = 1700fg−3/2 gm cm−2, Σp = 10fp−3/2 gm cm−2, cg = 105−1/4 cm s−1, (17) (19) (18) for the gas-disk surface density, particle-layer surface density, and sound speed, respectively. Apart from the factors fg and fp, this is just the minimum mass model. The calculation of the non-dimensional stopping time, τs, uses the Epstein and Stokes formulas as appropriate: τs =(cid:26) 4 × 10−4(a/mm)3/2f −1 g , 9 × 10−5(a/mm)2(/0.3)−5/4, otherwise, a/λmfp ≤ 2.002; where λmfp = f −1 g 2.75, (20) (21) -- 8 -- is the mean free path. The resulting τs depends on both particle size and radial location in the disk. Equation (20) is valid when the particle Reynolds number ReD = 2a∆u/ν . 1. This condition is satisfied in all the plots we present by adjusting the range of the abscissa if necessary. Here ∆u is the magnitude of the particle velocity relative to the gas which depends on τs according to equation (A1) in Youdin (2011), and ν = 2.45 × 1045/2f −1 cm2 s−1 is the kinematic viscosity. g The radial component of the particle dispersion velocity, cp, is calculated using equation (27) in Youdin (2011): cp = (1 + 2τ 2 s + (5/4)τ 3 1 + τ 2 s s )1/2 √αgcg. The radial mass diffusivity due to turbulence is written as: D = νg ScT , (22) (23) where νg is the turbulent momentum diffusivity of the gas and ScT is the turbulent Schmidt number. Following Youdin (2011) ScT = (1 + τ 2 s )2 1 + τs + 4τ 2 s . The turbulent viscosity of the gas, νg, is defined via an α parameter: νg = αgc2 g/Ω0, (24) (25) where the turbulence parameter αg is a measure of the local turbulence intensity of the gas and cg is the sound speed of the gas. After some substitutions one obtains: 1 + τs + 4τ 2 s (1 + τ 2 Σp (cid:19)2 s )2 (cid:18)QTgΣg bD = αg where QTg is the Toomre parameter of the gas disk: QTg ≡ cgΩ0 πGΣg . For the present nebula model we obtain: Σp (cid:19)2 (cid:18)QTgΣg = 108f −2 p ()−1/2, , (26) (27) (28) whose large leading coefficient accounts for the sensitivity to αg observed in the results. -- 9 -- The model of Youdin (2011) used to determine the height hp of the particle disk is: where hp = hgr αg τsψ + αg , ψ ≡ 1 + 2πGΣp Ω2 0hp = 1 + 2/QR. (29) (30) Equations (29) and (30) lead to a quadratic equation for hp/hg which is explicitly solved. Finally, we discuss the constraint due to inward radial drift of the instability wave as motivated earlier. We have The analysis of Nakagawa et al. (1986), extended to include terms quadratic in τs, gives for the equilibrium (i.e., neglecting acceleration terms) radial drift speed of the particle layer: tdrift = R/udrift. (31) udrift = −2ηuK(cid:20) where uK = Ω0R is the Keplerian speed, τs (1 + φp(z))2 + τ 2 s (cid:21) , η ≡ − R 2ρgu2 K ∂p ∂R = 1.3 × 10−31/2, (32) (33) is the pressure gradient parameter, and φp(z) ≡ ρ(z)/ρg(z) is the ratio of particle to gas density (the so-called particle loading) which in general depends on the vertical position z in the disk. Using vertical averages for both numerator and denominator we estimate φp ≡ ρ(z) ρg(z) ≈ Σ Σg hg h . (34) 2.3. Mechanistic Interpretation of the Instability Before we begin let us note that gas drag (identified by the parameter τs) enters not only as an explicit term in the momentum equations but also through setting the turbulent diffusivity, effective pressure, and height of the particle layer. That is, τs also affects the parameters bD, QT, and QR. In this sub-section we focus only on the role of the explicit gas drag terms in the momentum equations. Gravitational instability occurs when the increase of mutual gravity between approach- ing particles outweighs restoring forces. As is well known, an important restoring force in -- 10 -- Keplerian systems and for axisymmetric perturbations comes from the outwardly increasing angular momentum. Consider a perturbation mode (in radial velocity and density) such that particles accumulate in a toroidal region and deplete in the neighboring region. Self-gravity is not needed at this stage. A circle of particles at the inner edge of this region is displaced outward. If gas drag is absent, the circle will conserve its specific angular momentum ruθ and it will slow down more steeply than the local Keplerian speed slows with radius. It will therefore have a deficit of centripetal acceleration relative to the pull of the central gravi- tator and will experience an inward restoring force. Similarly, a circle at the outer edge of the toroidal region will be displaced inward and will speed up faster than the local Keple- rian value and experience an outward restoring force. This restoring force is what makes Keplerian disks stable via Rayleigh's criterion and is characterized by a +Ω2 0 term on the right-hand-side of the dispersion relation ω2 = C(ω) in the drag-free (SGW) case. Let us now consider the same picture but in the presence of the azimuthal gas drag term in the momentum equation. In this case, the azimuthal speed of an outward/inward displacing particle circle will remain closer to the local Keplerian value and there will not be as much of a deficit/excess of centripetal acceleration compared to the pull of the central gravitator. The restoring force is thus diminished. This is the mechanism by which the azimuthal gas drag term promotes instability. Ultimately, what has to overcome whatever restoring force remains is the increase in mutual gravity among the accumulating particles. Note that for an outwardly displacing circle, the gas flow is a tailwind relative to the particles and gas drag supplies them with more angular momentum. In actual fact, the gas revolves slightly slower than Keplerian due to pressure support. Hence an outwardly/inwardly displaced circle will actually experience a slightly smaller tail- wind/larger headwind than envisioned above. The net result is that everything that was described in the preceding paragraphs should be imagined to be taking place in a reference frame drifting inward (in the vertically averaged model). Consider the limit of large drag; specifically, assume that the stopping time ts is very In this case the azimuthal short compared to the time scale 1/ω of the perturbation. speed of the displaced circle will always remain very close to that of the local gas, namely, Keplerian. In this limit, therefore, the deficit/excess of angular momentum of displaced circles and hence the restoring tendency is completely anulled. One can see this explicitly by writing the dispersion relation (8) for this case: t−1 s (cid:2)C(k) − (ω + iDk2) i t−1 s (cid:3) + Ω2 0Dk2 − Ω2 0 t−1 s = 0. (35) One observes that the restoring force term (Ω2 0 in C(k)) is cancelled by the last term in (35). So far, our discussion has only considered the role of gas drag in the azimuthal momen- -- 11 -- tum equation. We now wish to study the role of the radial drag term. To keep the focus while τs will be varied. For simplicity, we will set QT = QR which corresponds to the case where the disk height is estimated as hp = cp/Ω0. on the drag terms in the momentum equation, the parameters QT, QR, and bD will be fixed To begin with let us set the mass diffusivity bD = 0 and plot the non-dimensional growth-rate Re(γ) (maximized with respect to wavenumber and the three roots of the cubic) versus τs; see Figure 1. The first case, QT = QR = 0.2 (Figure 1a), is unstable in the limit of zero explicit gas drag (τs → ∞) in the classical SGW way. Observe that in this case, increasing overall gas drag (lowering τs) reduces the growth-rate (solid line). If one artificially retains only the azimuthal gas drag (dashed line; radial drag turned off) then the instability is enhanced in accordance with the discussion of the preceding paragraphs. If only radial drag is retained (chain dotted; azimuthal drag turned off) we see that the instability is further weakened compared to the case with both drag terms active. We thus conclude that azimuthal/radial drag promotes/hinders instability. This is easy to appreciate: radial gas drag slows radial compressive and rarefactive particle motions. The second case, QT = QR = 2 (Figure 1b), is neutrally stable without gas drag (τs → ∞) and with bD = 0, i.e., neutrally stable in the SGW limit. It is only for this case that one may say "gas drag assists instability." Optimal enhancement occurs for τs = 1. If only azimuthal drag is present (dashed line, radial drag suppressed) then the more drag the better , i.e., the optimum disappears, again in agreement with the discussion in earlier paragraphs. As τs decreases, radial drag diminishes the instability, while azimuthal drag enhances it, leading to an optimum τs. When only radial drag is present, the maximum growth-rate is zero and thus is not shown. An inspection of all three roots of the cubic shows that this makes physical sense. In the absence of gas drag there is a zero root and two purely oscillating roots. In the presence of radial drag alone the two oscillating roots are damped, while the zero root remains zero. Next, let us introduce a little diffusivity, bD = 1.0. The case QT = QR = 0.2 (SGW unstable) is shown in figure 1c. Diffusivity does reduce growth-rates (compare with figure 1a) as expected, however, above a certain τs (≈ 2 for this case) azimuthal drag is stabilizing. This is contrary to our physical explanation and it will be suggested below that a gravito- diffusive instability mechanism is at play. Inspection of the individual roots showed that this behavior always corresponded to a pair of complex conjugate γ roots with non-zero oscillation frequency (overstability, Im(γ) 6= 0). This can also be described as a pair of growing waves propagating radially inward and outward. The bump or local maximum in the solid line near τs ≈ 1 shows that gas drag assisted behavior is present to the left of the plot. This was not the case for bD = 0. That is, mass diffusivity allows the gas drag assisted -- 12 -- instability to occur at lower QT. If we add mass diffusivity to the case (QT = QR = 2) that is gas drag assisted without diffusivity, we observe (figure 1d) the same qualitative behavior to the left of the plot as in bD = 0 case (apart from an expected decrease in peak growth-rate). However, to the right of the plot, the gravito-diffusive mode appears for τs above ≈ 200, and closer inspection reveals that for τs & 400 the diffusive case has a larger growth-rate that the non-diffusive case. Notice that the gravito-diffusive mode survives in the gas-free limit τs → ∞ when there is some mechanism of mass diffusivity still active to keep bD finite. An overstability with momentum diffusivity (viscosity) is known to exist in the context of planetary rings (for a review see Schmidt et al. (2009)). In the present case, we have encountered overstability with mass diffusivity. We shall not speculate on whether it is relevant in other astrophysical contexts. Varying QT in the τs → ∞ limit (for the razor thin case, QR = 0) shows (see figure 2) that diffusivity allows the Toomre instability to occur at all QT, albeit with decreasing growth rate as QT increases. It is for these reasons that we believe this mode (which is overstable in nature) to be gravito-diffusive in nature and invite the reader to explain it mechanistically. Since bD decreases with increasing τs in the case of stirring by a gas, the question arises whether the gravito-diffusive mode can be realized for particles in a solar nebula. To investigate this, a search was conducted in the range 10−8 ≤ αg ≤ 10−3, 0.1 ≤ a ≤ 100 cm, and 0.1 ≤ R ≤ 100 AU. The most amplified mode never had Im(γ) 6= 0. Figures 1e and 1f show that when bD = 100 the distinction between high QT and low QT disappears. Both now display gas drag assisted behavior except at sufficiently large τs where the gravito-diffusive mode appears. A different mechanistic interpretation of the instability has been given by Goodman and Pindor (2000) as follows. Consider a localized clump of positive density perturbation in the particle layer in the form of an axisymmetric ring. At the inner edge of the ring, particles will feel an extra outward gravitational force and, to maintain radial equilibrium in absence of the gas, will need to travel at less than Keplerian speed. In the presence of gas the particles will therefore be energized by gas drag and drift toward the center of the ring. At the outer edge of the ring, particles will feel an extra inward gravitational force and will need to travel at faster than Keplerian speed to maintain radial equilibrium. If gas drag is now turned on, they will be slowed down and drift inward. Compared to our explanation, that of Goodman and Pindor (2000) assumes equilibrium between gravitational forces and centripetal acceleration, i.e., it assumes zero restoring force due to the angular momentum gradient. This holds in the limit (very often true and discussed previously) of perturbation time scale much smaller than the particle stopping time. -- 13 -- Finally, it is worth emphasizing that, unlike particle concentration in pressure highs (Barge and Sommeria 1995; Haghighipour and Boss 2003) which occurs solely due to gas drag, the present instability requires both self-gravity and gas drag. 3. Results Table 1 summarizes the five models considered in paper II and repeated here with the mass diffusivity term added. The reference model has the following parameter values: particle size, a = 1 mm, enhancement/depletion factors (relative to the minimum mass solar nebula) of gas, fg = 1, and of particles, fp = 1. Figure 3 is analogous to Figure 4 (top) in paper II and shows e-fold growth times for the reference case and various weak to moderate values of αg. (Here and henceforth, growth times are plotted for the fastest mode among all three roots and all wavenumbers.) The lower set of curves (of lighter weight) are for zero mass diffusivity. The upper curves (heavier weight) are for the case with diffusivity. One concludes that including mass diffusivity increases growth times by about two orders of magnitude in the asteroid belt region at 3 AU. It appears that in this region turbulence levels must be such that αg < 10−7 to get growth times smaller than 106 years, a typical disk lifetime, and the situation becomes worse in the terrestrial planet region. However, the instability could perhaps play a role in the outermost regions of the disk for weak turbulence levels. For the same turbulence levels as in Figure 3, we now consider the effect of particle size a at R = 3 AU; see Figure 4. Growth time (heavy lines) decreases for larger particles. Also shown is the characteristic drift time of the instability wave which also decreases with particle size but more slowly than the growth time giving rise to a possibility that tgrow < tdrift. One observes that such a cross over occurs (for particle radii in the range of the plot) when the turbulence levels is sufficiently weak. Furthermore, the cross-over occurs for smaller particles as the turbulence diminishes. Paper II also considers the following four alternative models each of which makes the instability stronger: (i) an increase in the surface density of particles by a factor of fp = 4, (ii) a depletion in gas by a factor of fg = 0.1, (iii) an increase in the particle radius to a = 1 cm, and, finally, (iv) a model designated "all" that incorporates all of these changes. The "all" model, in which solids are enhanced relative to gas by a factor of 40 compared to the minimum mass solar nebula, produces the fastest growth times of all the models: these are plotted in figure 5 for larger turbulence intensities αg than in the previous figure up to the (global) value αg ∼ 0.01 required to account for observed disk accretion rates. The -- 14 -- increase in growth time at 3 AU from the non-diffusive to the diffusive treatment is now just less than an order of magnitude. Thus a solids-enhanced nebula is much less affected by turbulent diffusivity. This is not surprising because in the limit of vanishing gas density, none of the bothersome gas-related obstacles to GI will occur. For the standard turbulence intensity of αg = 0.01 the instability is not strong enough (e-fold time barely less than a million years). It should be noted that unlike the reference model, the "all" model produces a peak in growth rate at about 7 AU. For the same turbulence levels as in Figure 5 we now consider the effect of particle size. Figure 6 shows growth times (heavy lines) versus particle size for the particle enriched and gas depleted case (fg = 0.1, fp = 4). Again, these should be compared with the thin lines which show the corresponding drift time. One concludes that there exists a range of particles sizes for which tgrow < tdrift only if the turbulence is weaker than αg . 10−3. Paper II defines a "viable" instability as the satisfaction of three conditions. (1) e- folding times reasonably smaller than the disk lifetime, in particular tgrow < 105 yrs. (2) Growth times less than the drift time: tgrow < tdrift where tdrift is given in equation (16) of paper II. (3) Wavelength of the fastest mode reasonably shorter than the radius: λf < R/2. Figure 7 shows the maximum value of turbulence intensity αg that is still able to produce a viable gravitational instability of solids. The condition that is violated when αg exceeds the maximum value is depicted using different line types: solid, dashed, and dotted for the three conditions, respectively. One can see that under the favorable conditions represented by the "all" model, the instability becomes non-viable in the terrestrial planet region when the turbulence level exceeds αg = 10−4, and everywhere when αg > 10−3. Finally, Figure 8 shows the relative error in the maximum growth rate given by the approximate formula (16) valid for small growth rates compared to stopping times. The value plotted is the relative error in the maximum growth rate with respect to wavenumber. For the two cases shown, the approximate formula gives answers correct to within 10% if γapproxτs . 10−3. 4. Conclusion Under conditions of the minimum mass solar nebula at the distance of the terrestrial planets and the asteroid belt, the gas-drag mediated instability remains viable for chondrule sized particles only for very weak turbulence levels αg < 10−8. Even under the optimistic conditions of enhancement of the ratio of particle column density to gas column density by a factor of 40, and 1 cm particles (both of which promote the instability) the instability -- 15 -- remains viable only if αg < 10−4. Things look a little more optimistic further out. At 10 AU, under standard conditions the instability becomes too slow compared to nebula lifetime when αg > 10−7 while under the most optimistic conditions, viability of the instability is destroyed by exceedingly large wavelength for αg > 2 × 10−4. Clearly, research should be undertaken to pin down turbulence levels at the disk mid-plane. -- 16 -- Acknowledgement We would like to thank the referee for useful suggestions and pointing out several ty- pographical errors and one logical error in the original manuscript. We also thank Dr. A. Youdin for suggestions that improved the paper. REFERENCES I. Adachi, C. Hayashi, and K. Nakazawa. The gas drag effect on the elliptical motion of a solid body in the primordial solar nebula. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 56:1756 -- 1771, December 1976. P. Barge and J. Sommeria. Did planet formation begin inside persistent gaseous vortices? Astron. Astrophys., 295:L1 -- L4, 1995. J.E. Chambers. Making more terrestrial planets. ICARUS, 152:205 -- 224, 2001. J. N. Cuzzi and S. J. Weidenschilling. Particle-gas dynamics and primary accretion. In D. Lauretta and H. A. McSween, editors, Meteorites and the Early Solar System II, pages 353 -- 382. Univ. of Arizona Press, 2006. J.N. Cuzzi, A.R. Dobrovolskis, and J.M. Champney. Particle-gas dynamics in the midplane of a protoplanetary nebula. ICARUS, 106:102 -- 134, 1993. J.N. Cuzzi, R.C. Hogan, J.M. Paque, and A. R. Dobrovolskis. Size-selective concentration of chondrules and other small particles in protoplanetary nebula turbulence. Ap. J., 546:496 -- 508, 2001. C. P. Dullemond and C. Dominik. Dust depletion in protoplanetary disks: a rapid depletion of small grains. Astron. and Astrophys., 434:971 -- 986, 2005. C.P. Dullemond and C. Dominik. The effect of dust settling on the appearance of proto- planetary disks. Ap. J., 421:1075 -- 1086, 2004. C. F. Gammie. Layered Accretion in T Tauri Disks. Ap. J., 457:355 -- 362, January 1996. doi: 10.1086/176735. P. Garaud and D.N.C. Lin. On the evolution and stability of a protoplanetary disk dust layer. Ap. J., 608:1050 -- 1075, 2004. P. Goldreich and W.R. Ward. The formation of planetesimals. Ap. J., 183:1051 -- 1061, 1973. -- 17 -- J. Goodman and B. Pindor. Secular Instability and Planetesimal Formation in the Dust Layer. Icarus, 148:537 -- 549, December 2000. N. Haghighipour and A. P. Boss. On pressure gradients and rapid migration of solids in a nonuniform solar nebula. Ap. J., 583:996 -- 1003, February 2003. A. Johansen, H. Klahr, and Th. Henning. Gravoturbulent formation of planetesimals. Ap. J., 636:1121 -- 1134, 2006. S.J. Kenyon and B.C. Bromley. Gravitational stirring in planetary debris disks. Astro. J., 121:538 -- 551, 1993. E. Kokubo and S. Ida. Formation of protoplanets from planetesimals in the solar nebula. ICARUS, 143:15 -- 27, 2000. Y. Nakagawa, M. Sekiya, and C. Hayashi. Settling and growth of dust particles in a laminar phase of a low-mass solar nebula. ICARUS, 67:375 -- 390, 1986. V. S. Safronov. Kuiper prize lecture -- some problems in the formation of the planets. ICARUS, 94:260 -- 271, 1991. V.S. Safronov. Evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and the formation of the earth and planets. TTF 667, NASA, 1972. Original in Russian dated 1969. V.S. Safronov. Evolution of the dusty component of the circumsolar protoplanetary disk. Solar System Research, 21(3):135 -- 138, 1987. Translated from Astronomicheskii Vest- nik. J. Schmidt, K. Ohtsuki, N. Rappaport, H. Salo, and F. Spahn. Dynamics of Saturn's Dense Rings. In Dougherty, M. K., Esposito, L. W., & Krimigis, S. M., editor, Saturn from Cassini-Huygens, pages 413 -- 457. Springer Science, 2009. M. Sekiya. Quasi-equilibrium density distributions of small dust aggreggations in the solar nebula. ICARUS, 133:298 -- 309, 1998. W.R. Ward. The formation of the solar system. In E.H. Avrett, editor, Frontiers of Astro- physics, pages 1 -- 40. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1976. W.R. Ward. On planetesimal formation: the role of collective particle behavior. In R.M. Canup and K. Righter, editors, Origin of the Earth and Moon, pages 75 -- 84. University of Arizona Press, 2000. -- 18 -- S.J. Weidenschilling. Dust to planetesimals: Settling and coagulation in the solar nebula. ICARUS, 44:172 -- 189, 1980. S.J. Weidenschilling. Evolution of grains in a turbulent solar nebula. ICARUS, 60:553 -- 567, 1984. S.J. Weidenschilling. Formation of planetesimals and accretion of the terrestrial planets. Space Sci. Rev., 90:295 -- 310, 2000. A. N. Youdin and J. Goodman. Streaming instabilities in protoplanetary disks. Ap. J., 620: 459 -- 469, February 2005. doi: 10.1086/426895. A.N. Youdin. Planetesimal formation without thresholds. I. Dissipative gravitational insta- bilities and particle stirring by turbulence. 2005a. arXiv:astro-ph/0508659. A.N. Youdin. Planetesimal formation without thresholds. II. Gravitational instability of solids in turbulent protoplanetary disks. Ap. J. (submitted), 2005b. arXiv:astro- ph/0508662. A.N. Youdin. On the formation of planetesimals via secular gravitational instabilities with turbulent stirring. Ap. J., 731:99, 2011. arXiv:astro-ph/0508662. A.N. Youdin and E.I. Chiang. Particle pileups and planetesimal formation. Ap. J., 601: 1109 -- 1119, 2004. A.N. Youdin and F.H. Shu. Planetesimal formation by gravitational instability. Ap. J., 580: 494 -- 505, 2002. Andrew N. Youdin and Yoram Lithwick. Particle stirring in turbulent gas disks: Including orbital oscillations. ICARUS, 192(2):588 -- 604, 2007. doi: {10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07. 012}. This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v5.2. -- 19 -- Name particle size, a gas ratio, fg particle ratio, fp reference fg = 0.1 fp = 4 a = 1 cm all 1 mm 1 mm 1 mm 1 cm 1 cm 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 Table 1: Models -- 20 -- (a) QT = QR = 0.2, Dhat = 0 azimuthal drag only both present radial drag only 102 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 ) γ ( e R 10-4 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 101 102 103 104 100 τ s 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 ) γ ( e R (b) QT = QR = 2, Dhat = 0 azimuthal drag only both present radial drag alone gives Re( γ) = 0 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 101 102 103 104 100 τ s -- 21 -- 101 100 ) γ ( e R 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 ) γ ( e R (c) QT = QR = 0.2, Dhat = 1 azimuthal drag only both present radial drag only 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 τ s 101 102 103 104 (d) QT = QR = 2, Dhat = 1 azimuthal drag only radial drag only both present azimuthal only both 10-4 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 101 102 103 104 100 τ s -- 22 -- (e) QT = QR = 0.2, Dhat = 100 radial drag only azimuthal drag only both present both present azimuthal only 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 τ s 101 102 103 104 10-3 10-4 10-4 100 10-1 ) γ ( e R 10-2 100 10-1 ) γ ( e R 10-2 (f) QT = QR = 2, Dhat = 100 azimuthal drag only radial drag only both present both present azimuthal only 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 τ s 101 102 103 104 10-3 10-4 10-4 Fig. 1. -- Study of the effect of the explicit drag terms in the momentum equation. Growth , both azimuthal and radial drag terms rate Re(γ) versus τs at fixed QT, QT, and bD. , only azimuthal drag active; active; , only radial drag active. -- 23 -- Dhat = 0 Dhat = 0.1 Dhat = 1 Dhat = 10 101 100 10-1 10-2 0.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.5 QT ) γ ( e R Fig. 2. -- Maximum growth rate Re(γ) versus the Toomre parameter in the drag free limit , with finite mass diffusivity bD. The razor thin disk, QR = 0, is being considered. bD = 0; , bD = 0.1; , bD = 1; , bD = 10. -- 24 -- α g= 1 0-7 α g= 1 0-6 α g= 1 0-5 1 R [AU] 10 100 ] s r y [ w o r g t 108 107 106 105 104 103 0.1 Fig. 3. -- Growth times (mimimized with respect to wavelength) for the reference model. Two curves are shown for each line type. The lower set of curves (light type) is for zero mass diffusivity while the upper set (heavy type) is for non-zero diffusivity. Each line type , corresponds to a different value of αg as follows: αg = 10−7. Note: Growth times above 108 yr are not displayed. , αg = 10−6; , αg = 10−5; -- 25 -- 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 ] s r y [ t f i r d t r o w o r g t 101 0.1 1 a [cm] 10 100 Fig. 4. -- Effect of particle radius a on growth time (heavy lines) which should be compared with the corresponding characteristic drift time (thinner lines) of the instability wave. Mass diffusivity has been included. Minimum mass nebula (fg = 1, fp = 1) at 3 AU. The same , turbulence strengths and line types as Figure 3 are used, namely: αg = 10−6; , αg = 10−5; , αg = 10−7. -- 26 -- ] s r y [ w o r g t 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 1 10 R [AU] 100 , αg = 0.01; , αg = 10−4; Fig. 5. -- Growth times for model "all" and different turbulence strengths αg as follows: , αg = 10−5. The curves with heavy lines are for non-zero mass diffusivity while the thin lines are for zero mass diffusivity. The abscissa starts at R = 0.2 to ensure that the particle Reynolds number ≤ 1. , αg = 10−3; -- 27 -- drift (10-4) drift (10-3) gro wth (0.0 1) gro wth (1 0-3 ) gro wth (1 0-4 ) drift (0.01) 1 a [cm] 10 100 108 107 106 105 104 ] s r y [ t f i r d t r o w o r g t 103 0.1 Fig. 6. -- Effect of particle size a on growth time (heavy lines) which should be compared with the corresponding drift time (thinner lines). Particle enriched and gas depleted nebula (fg = 0.1, fp = 4) at 3 AU. The same turbulence strengths and line types as Figure 5 are used, namely: , αg = 10−3; , αg = 10−4. , αg = 0.01; -- 28 -- (a) Reference Model 1 R [AU] 10 100 (b) fg = 0.1 model 1 R [AU] 10 100 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 0.1 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 0.1 x a m g , α x a m g , α -- 29 -- (c) fp = 4 model 1 R [AU] 10 100 (d) a = 1 cm model 1 10 R [AU] 100 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 0.1 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 x a m g , α x a m g , α -- 30 -- (e) "all" model 1 10 R [AU] 100 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 x a m g , α Fig. 7. -- The maximum turbulence level αg the instability can tolerate. There are two curves for each model. The upper curve (light weight) is for zero mass diffusivity while the lower one (heavy weight) is for non-zero diffusivity. The line-type denotes the condition that : wavelength. The sets the maximum αg: abscissa starts at R = 0.3 AU in (d) and R = 0.2 AU in (e) to ensure a particle Reynolds number ≥ 1. . : nebula lifetime; : radial drift; -- 31 -- 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 g = 10-5 all, α fp = 4, α g = 10-7 ) x o r p p a γ / γ - 1 ( S B A 10-6 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 γ approx τ s 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Fig. 8. -- Locus of the relative error in the growth-rate (maximized over wavelength) pre- dicted by the approximate formula (16) as compared with the actual value (separately max- imized over wavelength). Each locus was obtained by varying the radius R and plotting the : "all" model and αg = 10−5; relative error versus γapproxτs. D 6= 0 for both cases. , fp = 4 model and αg = 10−7.
1307.7330	1	1307	2013-07-28T03:59:54	Optimizing the search for transiting planets in long time series	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Context: Transit surveys, both ground- and space- based, have already accumulated a large number of light curves that span several years. Aims: The search for transiting planets in these long time series is computationally intensive. We wish to optimize the search for both detection and computational efficiencies. Methods: We assume that the searched systems can be well described by Keplerian orbits. We then propagate the effects of different system parameters to the detection parameters. Results: We show that the frequency information content of the light curve is primarily determined by the duty cycle of the transit signal, and thus the optimal frequency sampling is found to be cubic and not linear. Further optimization is achieved by considering duty-cycle dependent binning of the phased light curve. By using the (standard) BLS one is either rather insensitive to long-period planets, or less sensitive to short-period planets and computationally slower by a significant factor of ~330 (for a 3yr long dataset). We also show how the physical system parameters, such as the host star's size and mass, directly affect transit detection. This understanding can then be used to optimize the search for every star individually. Conclusions: By considering Keplerian dynamics explicitly rather than implicitly one can optimally search the BLS parameter space. The presented Optimal BLS enhances the detectability of both very short and very long period planets while allowing such searches to be done with much reduced resources and time. The Matlab/Octave source code for Optimal BLS is made available.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. OptimizedBLSinlongtimeseriesv.3 September 19, 2018 c(cid:13) ESO 2018 Optimizing the search for transiting planets in long time series Aviv Ofir1,2 1 Institut fur Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universitat, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Gottingen, Germany. 2 e-mail: [email protected] Received XXX; accepted YYY ABSTRACT Context. Transit surveys, both ground- and space- based, have already accumulated a large number of light curves that span several years. Aims. The search for transiting planets in these long time series is computationally intensive. We wish to optimize the search for both detection and computational efficiencies. Methods. We assume that the searched systems can be well described by Keplerian orbits. We then propagate the effects of different system parameters to the detection parameters. Results. We show that the frequency information content of the light curve is primarily determined by the duty cycle of the transit signal, and thus the optimal frequency sampling is found to be cubic and not linear. Further optimization is achieved by considering duty-cycle dependent binning of the phased light curve. By using the (standard) BLS one is either rather insensitive to long-period planets, or less sensitive to short-period planets and computationally slower by a significant factor of ∼ 330 (for a 3yr long dataset). We also show how the physical system parameters, such as the host star's size and mass, directly affect transit detection. This under- standing can then be used to optimize the search for every star individually. Conclusions. By considering Keplerian dynamics explicitly rather than implicitly one can optimally search the BLS parameter space. The presented Optimal BLS enhances the detectability of both very short and very long period planets while allowing such searches to be done with much reduced resources and time. The Matlab/Octave source code for Optimal BLS is made available(cid:63). Key words. methods: data analysis -- stars: planetary systems 1. Introduction The BLS algorithm for the identification of transiting exoplanets (Kov´acs et al. 2002, hereafter KZM) is very widely used. While this work uses BLS as a concrete example, we stress that the main questions we address here are related to the information content of the data, and are therefore easily translatable to other detection algorithms. Compared to other period-searching algo- rithms, like Fourier transform or Lomb-Scargle periodograms, the computational load of BLS is rather high. This is an opposite conclusions to that of KZM since -- as we show here -- look- ing for transits requires many more frequency steps than looking for sine-like variations. Recently this situation became partic- ularly grave since both space- and ground- based surveys now span multiple years and have obtained hundreds of thousands of light curves (if not millions) and their BLS analysis quickly be- comes a challenge. In this paper we show that optimally stepping the BLS parameters, even without changing the BLS core tech- nique, can produce very significant performance improvements and improve sensitivity relative to standard practices at the same time. The BLS technique fits a box of some phase duration to a light curve folded at some test frequency, at all possible start- ing times - producing a three-dimensional search in orbital fre- quency, reference phase and duty cycle. For this reason the cur- rent work is also similarly divided: after defining the duty cycle in §2, we discuss the frequency search axis in §3, and the refer- ence phase and duty cycle search axes in §4. Finally, we discuss (cid:63) http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/avivofir/ if and how to choose the best-fitting frequency in §5 and con- clude in §6. 2. The transit signal duty cycle BLS aims at detecting a periodic sudden and short drop in the observed flux, ostensibly caused by a transiting planet. The or- bital period of a test particle, such as a planet, around the host star is given in Keplerian dynamics by: P2 = 4π2 GM a3 (1) (2π)2/3 R = π Consequently the phase duration, also known as the duty cycle, of a central transit in a large (a >> R) circular orbit with a period P (1/orbital frquency f ) around a star with mass and radius M and R, respectively, is : q( f, M, R) ≈ R πa (GM)1/3 f 2/3 Where a is the orbital semimajor axis. The observed duty cycle may be shorter than q( f, M, R), for example in non-central transits, or even longer than q( f, M, R) if R is underestimated or M is overestimated. Eccentric orbits may further change the observed duty cycle, to both shorter and longer than q( f, M, R), but eccentricity cannot (usually) be de- tected or even constrained from photometry alone, so for the re- mainder of this work we assume circular orbits. Still, the quoted q( f, M, R) is our a-priory expected duty cycle, and any correc- tions for longer or shorter duty cycles -- as discussed in §4 -- should be made relative to this number. (2) 3 1 0 2 l u J 8 2 . ] P E h p - o r t s a [ 1 v 0 3 3 7 . 7 0 3 1 : v i X r a 1 Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series Importantly, the typical targets for transit surveys are Solar- type stars which are all approximately similar in mass and size (a factor of 2 in either is very significant) while the orbital pe- riod can easily change over three orders of magnitudes - from sub-day to a year and longer. Therefore, for the optimization of the transit search the accuracy of the estimated M and R are far less important, and for the remainder of this work we assume Solar values for these parameters when giving numerical results. We note that while the original BLS did not require input of M and R at all, assumptions about the stellar mass and radius were always made, even if implicitly, by the definition of the other search parameters. By making them explicit we allow correcting for non-Solar values, such as in proposed searches for transiting planets around white dwarfs (Agol 2011). Residue" by KZM) scales with the number of points in transit, this is also the relative change in the BLS score due to ∆ f . To find the half width at half maximum (HWHM) of the BLS peak (which is a measure of frequency resolution) we set the condi- tion for the BLS score to half its peak value: ∆ fHWHM·S /2 = 1 2 or: ∆ fHWHM = q( ftrue,M,R) . In the presence of an unknown ftrue one needs to oversample this critical frequency resolution to be sure that the peak is not just missed between frequency sam- ples. We therefore add a frequency oversampling parameter OS which is the number of frequency points to calculate in the ex- pected HWHM range to give the final q( ftrue,M,R) S ∆ f = q( ftrue, M, R) S · OS (4) (cid:115) 3. The frequency axis 3.1. Search edges The available dataset will be described by a single parameter: its span in time, hereafter simply span and labeled S . The minimal search frequency is naturally derived from the goal of detecting periodic phenomena, so the maximum period can be no longer than half of the data span, or fmin = 2 S . One may prefer to use a more conservative fmin = 3 S that will help to separate similar but unrelated events from true periodicity by requiring observation of a third event - but we will use the former definition below. The maximal possible frequency could in principle be de- rived from the Shannon-Nyquist sampling theorem had we known the sampling frequency of our data, but a much more stringent limit usually comes from astrophysical arguments. By setting the orbital distance a in eq. 1 to 3R (scale of the Roche limit) one can determine the maximal frequency to search: fmax = 1 2π GM (3R)3 (3) Searching the range [ fmin, fmax] will ensure that all relevant or- bital periods are covered (down to about 14.5 hr for the Sun). 3.2. Frequency resolution When searching for transit signals it is commonly assumed that one should uniformly sample the orbital frequency rather than the orbital period (e.g. KZM). However, while this is true for sine-like signals, including the additional information that the transit duty cycle is also frequency-dependent changes that pic- ture. The frequency resolution of uniformly-sampled sine signals is 1 S . In the context of experimental data this is the width of the Fourier transform peak. We wish to find the corresponding num- ber for transit-like signals. We assume our signal was uniformly sampled and that it has an exact box shape, i.e.: when folded on the true frequency ftrue only the points in a small phase range spanning qtrue( ftrue, M, R) are all at some definite non-zero value, and all other points have a value of zero. We now consider an imperfect folding at some frequency ftrue + ∆ f : in such a case each point is shifted (relative to the exact case) by (∆ f · t) phase when t is the data point's time. If the reference time is the be- ginning of the dataset then on average points move by (∆ f · S /2) phase. The probability that such a shift will move the point to outside the true box is approximately the ratio of the phase shift ∆ f·S /2 q( ftrue,M,R). Since the BLS score (labeled "Signal to the box sizes 2 OS values of the order of a few (2-5) would suffice ensure the true peak is not missed. It is now easy to see that the frequency resolution ∆ f is no longer constant - it depends on f itself due to the physics of the problem. Also, one can compare this re- sult to the classical frequency resolution of 1 S to find that in the framework presented here sine functions of all frequencies have a constant effective duty cycle of 1, and indeed sine waves are (almost) always non-zero. The above result means that if one chooses a uniform fre- quency sampling with ∆ funi f orm that is suitable for short-period signals (i.e., large ∆ f ) a large portion of the long-period sig- nals will be missed between frequency samples and will not be detected. Conversely, if one chooses a uniform frequency sam- pling with ∆ funi f orm than is suitable for long-period signals (i.e., small ∆ f ), the computation time will be artificially increased by a large factor (see next subsection). Actually, the later choice will not just be slow to calculate but also it will be less sensitive to real signals by being too sensitive to noise: such a choice will allow "detection" of signals that are extremely unlikely to be transits. For e.g: a low duty cycle q = 10−3 is quite possible for a 1yr planet, but the same q means a < 4.5 minutes long transit for a 3d period - so by allowing such q values one becomes sensitive to phenomena that are more likely to be noise than signals, and so the BLS background noise increases. 3.3. Optimal frequency sampling Since it was shown above that a uniform frequency sampling law is not optimal, we wish to find the optimal frequency sampling sequence. This means solving the differential equation (eq. 4): d f = A f 2/3 A ≡ (2π)2/3 (5) R π (GM)1/3 1 S·OS (cid:17)3 By introducing a temporary variable x = 1, 2, 3, ... which is the index number of the sequence of f values, we solve equation 5: f (x) = C ≡ f 1/3 (cid:16) A 3 x + C min − A Where C is the constant of integration, and by requiring that the first value in the sequence (x = 1) to be fmin its value is deter- mined. This is a non-trivial result: we have shown that for transit surveys the optimal frequency sampling is cubic in frequency, and not linear. (6) Now we can count the number of frequency steps in the 3 (cid:18) above optimal sampling: max − f 1/3 f 1/3 N f req,optimal = min (cid:19) 3 A + A 3 (7) Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series For comparison, uniform sampling suitable for long periods de- tection has ∆ f = q( fmin,M,R) min , which translates to number S·OS of steps of: fmax − fmin A f 2/3 min N f req,uni f orm = = A f 2/3 (8) For a numerical example, in the case of a 3yr light curve of a Sun-like star (which is typical of the available Kepler data) this means that using uniform sampling is N f req,uni f orm = 39 times N f req,optimal slower than using optimal frequency sampling (see Figure 1), while not offering improved sensitivity relative to the optimal sampling (actually, the other way around, see §3.2). axis on different threads 1. The contribution of multithreading to the Optimal BLS performance obviously depends on the used computer system. However, we observed a less than linear per- formance gain when scaling the threads count, and we guess it is related to the fact that each one of the many frequencies (> 105 frequencies for a 3yr data) takes only a very short time to calcu- late so the communication overhead is significant. We therefore recommend using multithreading only for the the manual evalu- ation of one/few objects, which is required when more attention is given to specific systems. For large scale processing we rec- ommend using the different threads to process different groups (which requires no communication, and also strengthens the case for not-too-large groups, where the concept of BLS groups is ex- plained in §4.4). 4. On the folded light curve KZM showed that computing the BLS metric using the original data points is computationally wasteful since virtually the same result can be obtained using phase-binned data -- as long as the bin size is small enough so that at least one bin would fall com- pletely in-transit, and not only partially so. We therefore describe below the binless and binned BLS parameters, where the former describes more accurately the possible true signals and the later is the corresponding parametrization of Optimal BLS. 4.1. Binless BLS: Duty cycle axis: In this section we assume that the data was al- ready folded at some test frequency ftest. We therefore expect that a central transit would have a duty cycle of q( ftest, M, R). However, as mentioned above, the observed transit can be both longer or shorter. Importantly, extreme circumstances are re- quired for the observed transit to be more than a few times longer or shorter than the expected q( ftest, M, R). We can therefore pa- rameterize factors 1/Qmin > 1 and Qmax > 1 such that we wish to look at test duty cycles qtest in the range < (9) qtest q( ftest, M, R) < Qmax 1 Qmin and expect that both 1/Qmin and Qmax to have a value of a few: probably no more than about 3, and with only extreme cases reaching to 5 or higher values. The reference phase axis: the reference phase (the mid- transit phase) can have any value between 0 and 1, and all points should be checked in principle. However, there is little gain in setting the reference phase resolution to much smaller then q( ftest, M, R) itself, since the number of in-transit points will not change significantly. Fig. 1. The number of frequency steps required by a uniform sampling scheme (upper, blue line) and the optimal sampling scheme (lower, greem line). Vertical dashed lines represent the time span of some existing and expected ground- and space- based datasets. Finally, we comment that since different frequencies can be evaluated independently the Optimal BLS code we make avail- able also allows for parallel evaluation of BLS in the frequency 4.2. BLS with binning: Duty cycle axis: When one bins the data one loses some sen- sitivity by not optimally using the data in the bins that contain either the ingress or the egress. This effect can be minimized by using a large number of small bins, but then the computational benefit of binning erodes. We show how to properly choose the bin size to find a good balance between the speed of computation and sensitivity. The binless Qmin and Qmax parameters above are used to define their binned counterparts MinBin and NumBins 1 Multithreading can be controled by changing the code from parfor to for and vice versa. 3 Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series in the following way: since one needs at least one bin to be completely in-transit the minimum bin size should be smaller than the smallest expect transit q( ftest, M, R)/Qmin by some fac- tor MinBin. Larger expected transits up to Qmax would be fit- ted using an integer number of this minimum-sized bin given by NumBins. Mathematically this means that smallest bin size = q( ftest, M, R)/Qmin MinBin (10) MinBin should be larger than 2 to be sensitive to transits q( ftest, M, R)/Qmin long regardless of the true transit phase, and should have a value of a few (i.e., not a large number) to reduce the computational load. To avoid confusion, we stress that Qmin and Qmax describe the underlying transit signals that we want to search for, while MinBin and NumBins describe the search grid. Longer transits will be searched using groups of bins, or a bin width of an integer multiple of this smallest bin size. The longest expected transit would have a duration that is Qmin· Qmax times the shortest expected transit, so the largest number of bins to be searched is NumBins = Qmin · Qmax (11) The reference phase axis: Using such a binning scheme would allow signals to be readily detected even if their reference time is shifted with respect to the used bins grid, since there will always be at least one bin which is completely in-transit. One therefore still has to check all possible reference phases, but now at a reduced resolution of the bins, which is automatically not much smaller than q( ftest, M, R). 4.3. The computational load The configurations that need to be checked are all NumBins pos- sible widths, starting from all (smallest bin size)−1 possible ref- erence phases. Importantly, when optimally binning, the com- putational load of the individual test frequencies also depends on q( ftest, M, R), meaning that again the choice of a constant bin size incurs penalties. Specifically, the number of configurations to check by using optimal binning is: Ncon f.,optimal( ftest) = NumBins · MinBin · Qmin q( ftest, M, R) A uniform binning scheme suitable for lone-periods detection would have to scan a different number of configurations: Ncon f.,uni f orm( ftest) = NumBins · MinBin · Qmin q( fmin, M, R) Note that by definition of this scheme as uniform it does not have dependency on ftest. The total computational load is just the integration of the number of configurations that need to be checked over all frequencies: The total speedup of using optimal sampling and binning is therefore: speedup = Ncon f.,uni f orm Ncon f.,optimal = 3 f 4/3 min (cid:16) fmax − fmin min − f −1/3 f −1/3 max (cid:17) Which for a 3yr dataset is a very significant speedup factor of 337. For a 8yr dataset the speedup factor is even higher at > 880. 4 Ncon f.,optimal = Ncon f.,uni f orm = NumBins MinBin Qmin A2 S OS NumBins MinBin Qmin A2 S OS (cid:17) (cid:16) · 3 · fmax − fmin min − f −1/3 f −1/3 max f 4/3 min 4.4. Phase folding Apart from discussing the BLS calculation on the folded light curve we note that the phase-folding step itself is computation- ally intensive. When applied to simulated continuous 3yr long Kepler-like dataset, our optimized implementation spent ∼ 2/3 of the time phase-folding the data. Since for the vast majority of targets in a transit survey there is near-perfect overlap in time stamps (every image of a given field is common to nearly all its targets), these are mostly redundant calculations. Importantly, these redundant calculation will significantly dilute the benefits of Optimal BLS and cause the actual run-time to be longer than suggested by eq. (16) since phase-folding of the data is sped up only by the factor given by dividing eq. 8 by eq. 7. We therefore allowed for parallel execution of all the BLS calculation steps on multiple stars -- so multiple stars are evalu- ated at each test frequency -- and the phase folding is done once for each such group. From practical standpoint, such a group should typically contain several tens of stars (maybe up to a hun- dred or so) which virtually nullifies the relative time penalty for phase folding, but without incurring a memory penalty by in- cluding too large groups. Avoiding too large groups is advisable also since one may not always find enough stars with similar- enough masses and radii (which affect the frequency sampling and phase binning schemes). When comparing the actual time it takes to calculate BLS on one group using our original and optimized versions, one would expect that due to the above effects the observed speedup factor will be lower than that predicted by eq. 16 for "groups" of one light curve. On the other hand, the observed speedup factor will approach eq. 16 for large-enough groups since for them the rela- tive time spent on phase-folding was reduced. This expectation, as well as the speedup scaling with data span (which is the main result of this work), were observed in actual calculations span- ning a factor > 30 in data spans and a factor of 100 in group sizes (Figure. 2), validating the above analysis. 5. Choosing the best-fitting frequency 5.1. Normalization Obviously, the best-fitting frequency is the one with the highest significance above the background of other tested frequencies. We now consider how to choose this best-fitting frequency, and determine it's significant. The first question appears to be trivial as one may simply answer that it would be the frequency with the corresponding highest numerical value of the above BLS run. A first-order answer to the second question was given already by KZM: they defined the SDE (Signal Detection Efficiency) met- ric by first subtracting the mean of the BLS values and than nor- malizing to the scatter of the resultant data. This made the SDE naturally scaled: an SDE value of X means that the this partic- ular period is more significant by Xσ than the bulk of checked orbital frequencies. However, the BLS spectrum of real targets has two important structures that make these choices sub-optimal: (1) there is a ris- ing trend of the BLS values towards lower frequencies, i.e.: the local average of the periodogram rises. (2) there is a rising scatter towards lower frequencies, i.e.: the local scatter around the lo- cal average of periodogram increases towards lower frequencies. These two frequency dependencies are expected: as datasets get longer the tested orbital frequencies get smaller and so the ex- pected duty cycle at each of these test frequencies q( ftest, M, R) gets smaller. This means that a progressively smaller number of (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series chooses a different technique of estimating the local BLS trend and BLS scatter. Some of these effects can be see on Figure 3: this is the raw Optimal BLS spectrum of a typical target (Kepler's KIC 10028792, or KOI 1574) spanning 1141d, after SARS de-correlation (Ofir et al. 2010) and removal of its known giant planet candidate (KOI 1574.01, Batalha et al. 2012). It is easy to see that: -- There is a sharp rise of BLS towards low frequencies: the BLS trend is near-constant above 10−2d−1, or on more than 99% of the frequency range, and practically all the BLS trend variability is below that threshold. -- The local scatter is also increasing towards lower frequen- cies -- from a value of about 1.2 to a value of 3 and more in this particular case. This is best seen by looking at the local scatter of the BLS trend curve. -- The highest peak (at f = 2.615 · 10−3d−1 is the first har- monic of of the 191d planet candidate reported by Ofir and Dreizler (2012). Notably, the width of the peak is a few times 10−6d−1 (panel C). This width can be compared to another peak (panel D) at P ∼ 5.83d ( f ∼ 0.171dd−1) which has a width of ∼ 10−4d−1, or several tens of times wider. With SDE> 32 this additional peak is not noise: it (and the adja- cent peak at f ≈ 0.111 too) correspond to two new candidate that were not detected by the Kepler pipeline2 and are now reported in [Ofir et al. 2013], despite their raw BLS score be- ing much lower than the corresponding low-frequency back- ground. -- Apart from the general trend, there are several additional rather sharp breaks in the BLS spectrum (especially visible on the trend curve). Due to these jumps the BLS trend curve cannot be well-modeled by a simple function like a polyno- mial, and a numerical function like a median filter (but not limited to it) may perform better. The last remaining issue is to determine the threshold value above which candidate signals should be considered as probable real detections. 5.2. Significance threshold We simulated 1000 light curves, all spanning 100d and contain- ing transit signals of various periods, durations and depths both above and below the detection threshold. The light curves were rather benign in the sense that they included white noise only, and no jumps or discontinuities were simulated. We then com- pared the detected and simulated periods, and plotted the ab- solute value of their fractional difference against the SDE (as defined above) of that detected period (see fig. 4). The separa- tion between good detection and misses is clear. Importantly, all the misses also had low SDE, so the false alarm rate (a de- tection when there is no signal) is very low for SDE> 15. We conclude that detections of approximately this significance and higher should be promoted to the next level of checks (which is beyond the scope of this paper). 6. Discussion The Kepler public archive 3 currently includes about 200,000 stars monitored for about three years. The ground-based 2 At the time this paper was submitted 3 http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/ 5 Fig. 2. The speedup factor of Optimal BLS relative to the un- optimized BLS vs. the span of the simulated dataset (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 days). The different lines are the ratio of run times measured for different runs, each one for a different group size (1, 10 and 100 stars per group, in blue circles, green squares and red triangles respectively). The solid black line is the predicted speedup factor from e.q. 16 and is not a fit. See text for further discussion. points are actually required to be in-transit, and so the probabil- ity that the mean value of smaller random groups of points will be different from the global mean will increase, driving both the mean value and the scatter of the raw BLS spectrum up. Also, the sensitivity to a small number of anomalies or ill-corrected dis- continuities will be significantly increased as test frequencies de- crease as there will be less data points "in-transit" to average-out such instances. All the above will result in an accelerating rate of changes in the "background" BLS spectrum towards lower frequencies. In order to solve these problems we slightly generalize the way SDE is calculated: -- Instead of removing the mean value, we remove the median- filtered periodogram. We note that due to the optimal sam- pling of the frequency axis, peaks at all frequencies now in- clude a similar number of points, so by choosing a median filter with window size much larger (≥ 10 times) than the oversampling parameter OS one ensures the peaks of in- terest are not filtered or attenuated. We label this curve as BLSternd( f ). -- After removing BLSternd we wish to evaluate the local scat- ter of the data. For that we simply evaluate abs(di f f (BLS)) -- the absolute value of the point-to-point difference of the periodogram. We then median-smooth that data similarly to the way it was done above, to obtain the local scatter curve - and we label this as curve as BLSscatter( f ). -- Our genaralized SDE is now: SDE( f ) = BLS( f )−BLSternd( f ) Now the SDE is normalized to better reflect the true signif- icance of a given peak over its local background, even if one BLSscatter( f ) Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series Fig. 3. Panel A: The Optimal BLS spectrum of Kepler's KOI 1574 (blue) and its BLSternd (red) after removing planet candidate KOI 1574.01 using all available data through Quarter 13. Panel B: The same, after removing BLSternd. Panels C, D: two zoomed- in regions with significant local peaks. Optimal frequency sampling is evident by the fact that each peak is sampled with similar number of samples despite the large difference in width. Table 1. Parameter definition and source of value. Parameter name Meaning M [kg] R [m] S [s] f [s−1] fmin [s−1] fmax [s−1] OS Qmin Qmax MinBin NumBins target star mass target star radius span of data test frequency lowest searched frequency highest searched frequency frequency oversampling shortest expected transit relative to q longest expected transit relative to q smallest used bin size relative to Qmin maximum number of smallest bins Value choser by external data (if available) external data (if available) From the light curve eq. 6 2/S or 3/S eq. 3 order of a few (3 - 5) order of a few (3 - 5) order of a few (3 - 5) order of a few (3 - 5) eq. 11 SuperWASP survey public archive 4 is much larger, holding al- most 1.8 · 107 unique light curves and spanning a longer time base (though not continuously as Kepler), and there are many other publicly available datasets. For scale, we note that the Kepler transiting planets search is performed on the Pleiades -- NASA's most powerful supercomputer -- which runs at over one petaflop . These resources are hardly commonly available, so if one wishes to make an independent search for transiting planets in the Kepler dataset (e.g. Ofir & Dreizler 2012) one should try to use the available resources efficiently. In this paper we show that by assuming Keplerian dynamics one can simultaneously reduce the computation time by two to (almost) three orders of magni- tude and improve the sensitivity for shallow transit signals. We explained in detail the physical meaning of all parame- ters to aid the understanding of the parameters used in the con- text of the problem of transit detection. The range of freedom for the algorithm to try fitting many box-shaped models to the data is given in the form of a series of normalized parameters that all have a suggested value of a few. This formulation allows for a "hands-free" application of BLS - it will be applied optimally 4 http://www.wasp.le.ac.uk/public/ 6 fast and with optimal sensitivity to all light curves regardless of their span. Furthermore, if one happens to have external infor- mation on the target stars (roughly estimated mass and/or radius) the information can be incorporated to further tailor the search for this particular target, including non-standard configurations such as planets around white dwarfs (Agol 2011). Importantly, the stellar parameters are not new - they were simply implicitly assumed when setting the search parameters on the unoptimized BLS. Importantly, significant speedup can be obtained by using unmodified BLS code by simply sampling the frequency axis optimally (see Figure 1) instead of uniformly. Further optimiza- tions can be attained by optimal binning (small changes to the code) and common phase folding (larger modifications). In any case, we make the Matlab/Octave source code for Optimal BLS freely available. Another result of formulating all parameters rel- ative to Keplerian orbits is that well-understood trade-offs are now possible. For example, one may be willing to lose some sensitivity to planets with long transits caused by high eccentric- ities -- these are likely to be rejected later as suspected EBs -- in order to speed up calculations. Aviv Ofir: Optimized search for transiting planets in long time series Fig. 4. The (absolute value) fractional difference between in- jected and detected period, vs. SDE for 1000 simulated signals in 100d long light curves. The vertical separation between good detections (lower points cloud) and misses (upper points cloud) increases as the data span increases, and here these are already well separated. Importantly, there is not a single missed signal with SDE> 15. While the importance of optimizing the search for long- period planets is almost obvious, we note that the improved sen- sitivity to short-period signals recently became also important as a new sub-population of very hot and very small planets -- that do not exist on the Solar system -- is now being detected. The first members in this group were CoRoT-7b and Kepler-10b (L´eger et al. 2009 and Batalha et al. 2011, respectively), but now it also includes a number of compact multi-planet systems that all have periods of a few days or even less than a day, such as the KOI 961 system (Muirhead et al.2012). 7. Acknowledgements I from the Deutsche acknowledge financial Forschungsgemeinschaft under DFG GRK 1351/2. I thank Guillem Anglada and Mathias Zechmeister for fruitful dis- cussion of these results. The starting point of this work is a MATLAB implantation of BLS that was developed by Omer Tamuz and Tsevi Mazeh. support References Agol, E. 2011, ApJ, 731, L31 Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 27 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, arXiv:1202.5852 Kov´acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369 L´eger, A., Rouan, D., Schneider, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 287 Muirhead, P. S., Johnson, J. A., Apps, K., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 144 Ofir, A., Alonso, R., Bonomo, A. S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, L99 Ofir, A., & Dreizler, S. 2012, arXiv:1206.5347 Ofir, A., Dreizler, A., Zechmeister, M., & Husser, T. O. 2013 in preparation. 7
0911.5522	1	0911	2009-11-29T22:26:43	The Return of Activity in Main-Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro is the first-known and currently best-characterised member of the main-belt comets, a recently-identified class of objects that exhibit cometary activity but which are dynamically indistinguishable from main-belt asteroids. We report here on the results of a multi-year monitoring campaign from 2003 to 2008, and present observations of the return of activity in 2007. We find a pattern of activity consistent with the seasonal activity modulation hypothesis proposed by Hsieh et al. (2004, AJ, 127, 2997). Additionally, recomputation of phase function parameters using data in which 133P was inactive yields new IAU parameters of H_R=15.49+/-0.05 mag and G_R=0.04+/-0.05, and linear parameters of m_R(1,1,0)=15.80+/-0.05 mag and Beta=0.041+/-0.005 mag/deg. Comparison between predicted magnitudes using these new parameters and the comet's actual brightnesses during its 2002 and 2007 active periods reveals the presence of unresolved coma during both episodes, on the order of ~0.20 of the nucleus cross-section in 2002 and ~0.25 in 2007. Multifilter observations during 133P's 2007 active outburst yield mean nucleus colours of B-V=0.65+/-0.03 mag, V-R=0.36+/-0.01 mag, and R-I=0.32+/-0.01 mag, with no indication of significant rotational variation, and similar colours for the trail. Finally, while 133P's trail appears shorter and weaker in 2007 than in 2002, other measures of activity strength such as dust velocity and coma contamination of nucleus photometry are found to remain approximately constant. We attribute changes in trail strength to the timing of observations and projection effects, thus finding no evidence of any substantial decrease in activity strength between 2002 and 2007.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–19 (2009) Printed 30 May 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The Return of Activity in Main-Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro Henry H. Hsieh1(cid:63), David Jewitt2, Pedro Lacerda1,3, Stephen C. Lowry4, and Colin Snodgrass5,6 † 1Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, United Kingdom 2Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences and Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, UCLA, 3713 Geology Building, Box 951567, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 3Newton Fellow 4Centre for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NH, United Kingdom 5Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max-Planck-Str. 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 6European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile Submitted, 2009-10-27; Accepted, 2009-11-25 ABSTRACT Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro is the first-known and currently best-characterised member of the main-belt comets, a recently-identified class of objects that exhibit cometary activity but which are dynamically indistinguishable from main-belt asteroids. We report here on the results of a multi-year monitoring campaign from 2003 to 2008, and present observations of the return of activity in 2007. We find a pattern of activity consistent with the seasonal activity modulation hypothesis proposed by Hsieh et al. (2004, AJ, 127, 2997). Additionally, recomputation of phase function parameters using data in which 133P was inactive yields new IAU parameters of HR = 15.49± 0.05 mag and GR = 0.04± 0.05, and linear parameters of mR(1, 1, 0) = 15.80 ± 0.05 mag and β = 0.041 ± 0.005 mag deg−1. Comparison between predicted magnitudes using these new parameters and the comet's actual brightnesses during its 2002 and 2007 active periods reveals the presence of unresolved coma during both episodes, on the order of ∼0.20 of the nucleus cross-section in 2002 and ∼0.25 in 2007. Multifilter observations during 133P's 2007 active outburst yield mean nu- cleus colours of B − V = 0.65 ± 0.03, V − R = 0.36 ± 0.01, and R − I = 0.32 ± 0.01, with no indication of significant rotational variation, and similar colours for the trail. Finally, while 133P's trail appears shorter and weaker in 2007 than in 2002, other measures of activity strength such as dust velocity and coma contamination of nu- cleus photometry are found to remain approximately constant. We attribute changes in trail strength to the timing of observations and projection effects, thus finding no evidence of any substantial decrease in activity strength between 2002 and 2007. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS 2 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Key words: comets: general – comets: individual (133P/Elst-Pizarro) – minor plan- ets, asteroids 1 INTRODUCTION Discovered on 1996 August 7 (Elst et al. 1996), Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro (also designated 7968 Elst-Pizarro; hereafter 133P) orbits in the main asteroid belt (a = 3.156 AU, e = 0.165, i = 1.39◦). It has a Tisserand parameter (with respect to Jupiter) of TJ = 3.184, while classical comets have TJ < 3 (Vaghi 1973; Kres´ak 1980). In 2005, two more objects displaying cometary activity that are likewise dynamically indistinguishable from main-belt asteroids were identified: P/2005 U1 (Read) (Read et al. 2005) and 176P/LINEAR (also known as asteroid 118401 (1999 RE70)) (Hsieh et al. 2006). Their discoveries led to the designation of a new cometary class - the main-belt comets (MBCs) - among which 133P is also classified (Hsieh & Jewitt 2006b). A fourth MBC, P/2008 R1 (Garradd), has also since been discovered (Garradd et al. 2008; Jewitt et al. 2009). Despite the initial excitement over the discovery of the cometary nature of 133P in 1996, no physical studies or monitoring reports were published in the refereed literature until the comet's activity was re-observed in 2002 (Hsieh et al. 2004; Lowry & Fitzsimmons 2005). Consequently, little is known about 133P's active behaviour in that intervening period. Since knowledge of the timing of active episodes can constrain hypotheses concerning the source of the activity, we report the results of our own monitoring campaign, which began following 133P's active outburst in 2002 and which culminated in observations of renewed activity in 133P in 2007. 2 OBSERVATIONS Since 133P's 2002 active episode, we have monitored the comet for evidence of recurrent dust emission using the University of Hawaii (UH) 2.2-m telescope and the 10-m Keck I telescope, both on Mauna Kea, the 1.3-m telescope operated by the Small and Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System (SMARTS) Consortium at Cerro Tololo, and the 3.58-m New Technology Tele- scope (NTT) operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) at La Silla. All observations (cid:63) Email: [email protected] † Some of the presented data were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. Some data were also obtained at Small and Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System (SMARTS) facilities at Cerro Tololo under programme NOAO-07B-0506, and at European Southern Observatory (ESO) facilities at La Silla under programmes 079.C-0384A and 081.C-0822A. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 reported here were obtained under photometric conditions. Details of these monitoring observa- tions are listed in Table 1. Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 3 Observations with the UH 2.2-m telescope were made using a Tektronix 2048×2048 pixel CCD with an image scale of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)219 pixel−1 behind Kron-Cousins BVRI filters. Observations with Keck were made using the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS) imager (Oke et al. 1995) which employs a Tektronix 2048×2048 CCD with an image scale of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)210 pixel−1 and Kron- Cousins BVRI filters. Observations with the SMARTS 1.3-m were made using the optical channel of A Novel Double-Imaging Camera (ANDICAM) which employs a Fairchild 447 2048×2048 CCD with an image scale of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)369 pixel−1 (using 2×2 binning) and Johnson-Kron-Cousins BVRI filters. Observations with the NTT in 2007 were made using the ESO Multi-Mode Instrument (EMMI) (Dekker et al. 1986) which employs two adjacent 2048×4096 MIT/LL CCDs with image scales of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)332 pixel−1 (using 2×2 binning) and Bessel BVRI filters, while observations in 2008 were made using the ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC2) (Buzzoni et al. 1984) which employs a Loral/Lesser 2048×2048 CCD with an image scale of 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)24 pixel−1 (using 2×2 binning) and Bessel BVR and Gunn i filters. Except for those conducted with the SMARTS 1.3-m telescope, all observations were made while tracking our target non-sidereally to prevent trailing of the object. For SMARTS 1.3-m observations, non-sidereal tracking was not available, and as such, exposure times were selected such that the trailing of the object during the course of a single exposure would be less than 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)5, well below the typical full width at half-maximum (FWHM) seeing at the 1.3-m site. Standard image preparation (bias subtraction and flat-field reduction) was performed for all im- ages. Flat fields were constructed from dithered images of the twilight sky. Photometry of Landolt (1992) standard stars and field stars was obtained by measuring net fluxes (over sky background) within circular apertures, with background sampled from surrounding circular annuli. Comet pho- tometry was performed using circular apertures of different radii (ranging from 2.(cid:48)(cid:48)0 to 5.(cid:48)(cid:48)0), but to avoid the contaminating effects of the coma, background sky statistics were measured manually in regions of blank sky near, but not adjacent, to the object. Several (5–10) field stars in the comet images were also measured to correct for minor extinction variations during each night. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 4 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass 3 RESULTS & DISCUSSION 3.1 Monitoring Campaign For all monitoring observations, individual R-band images (aligned on the object's photocenter using linear interpolation) from each night were combined into single composite images (Fig. 1). For reference, we also show composite images from 133P's 2002 active phase (Figs. 1a–1d; Hsieh et al. 2004). Activity is marginally visible in images from 2007 May 19, 2007 August 18, and 2007 September 12 (Figs. 1p, 1r, 1s), while the comet's characteristic dust trail is clearly visible in the image from 2007 July 17 (Fig. 1q). We find no evidence of activity in images from 2003 September 22 through 2007 March 21 (Figs. 1e–1o) and from 2008 July 1 (Fig. 1t). In all images, even those obtained while 133P was active, the FWHM of the object's surface brightness profile is consistent with the typical FWHM seeing at the time of night when those images were obtained, implying that little or no coma is present. In Figure 2, we mark the positions where we observed 133P to be active or where others reported it to be active, as well as positions where we observed it to be inactive, on a plan view of its orbit. The figure shows that reports of activity in 133P are approximately confined to the quadrant following perihelion, with the earliest detection of activity occurring shortly before perihelion at a true anomaly of ν ≈ 350◦ and the latest detection occurring at ν ≈ 90◦. This activity profile is consistent with the hypothesis of seasonal activity modulation described in Hsieh et al. (2004) and Hsieh & Jewitt (2006a), whereby 133P's activity is driven by the sublimation of a localised patch of exposed volatile material confined to either the "northern" or "southern" hemisphere of the body. Assuming non-zero obliquity, activity then only occurs during the portion of the orbit when that active site receives enough solar heating to drive sublimation, i.e., during that hemisphere's "summer". We note that our observations of 133P on 2008 July 1 at the NTT showed it to be inactive despite the object being observed to be active at nearly the same orbital position in 2002. We attribute this discrepancy to a combination of the low signal-to-noise of this observation and the expected extremely weak activity of 133P at that point in its orbit (Hsieh et al. 2004). 3.2 Photometric Activity Detection and Measurement When no coma is clearly visible for an object, an alternate method for detecting activity is ex- amination of its photometric behaviour: i.e., determining whether it is consistent with an inactive object of a fixed size, or whether it shows anomalous brightening over a certain portion of its orbit. This type of analysis led to the discovery of activity in 95P/(2060) Chiron (Tholen et al. 1988; Bus c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 5 et al. 1988; Meech & Belton 1989; Hartmann et al. 1990). In applying this approach to 133P, we recall that Hsieh et al. (2004) originally derived linear and IAU H,G phase function solutions for 133P using data taken in 2002 when the object was visibly emitting dust. In the case of that data set, 133P's activity was judged to contribute negligibly to nucleus photometry (as no significant coma was detected) and was thus assumed to affect phase function derivations similarly negligi- bly. Having since accumulated a substantial set of observations while 133P was entirely inactive, though, we can now assess the validity of this neglect by deriving new phase function solutions and comparing the results to those of Hsieh et al. (2004). We caution that, unlike the data used by Hsieh et al. (2004), the photometric data used in this follow-up analysis (2003 Sep 22 to 2007 Mar 21) all consist of "snapshot observations", which are short sequences of exposures at unknown rotational phases, instead of full lightcurves. This caveat is significant because rotation of the body is expected to cause deviations in measured brightness by as much as 0.2 mag from the comet's true mean brightness at a given time (Hsieh et al. 2004). Given a sufficiently large data set, however, we expect that the average of these fluctuations will approach zero, allowing us to derive reasonably accurate phase function solutions without nec- essarily knowing the rotational phase at which each individual photometry point was obtained. Nonetheless, the lack of rotational phase information for our snapshot observations remains a source of uncertainty. We compute the reduced magnitude, mR(1, 1, α), of 133P at the time of each observation using (1) mR(1, 1, α) = mmid(R, ∆, α) − 5 log(R∆) where R is the heliocentric distance of the object in AU, ∆ is the object's geocentric distance in AU, and mmid(R, ∆, α) is the estimated R-band magnitude at the midpoint of the full photometric range of the rotational lightcurve (Table 1). For observations of full lightcurves, mmid is determined by simply plotting the data and locating the midpoint between the maximum and minimum values of the lightcurve. For snapshot observations, mmid is generally taken to be the mean of the available photometry data with large error bars applied to reflect rotational phase uncertainties, assuming a full possible photometric range of 0.40 mag. We fit reduced magnitude values to both a linear phase function and an IAU phase function, finding best-fit values of mR(1, 1, 0) = 15.80±0.07 mag and β = 0.041 ± 0.005 mag deg−1 for the linear phase function where mR(1, 1, α) = mR(1, 1, 0) + βα. (2) We also find best-fit values of HR = 15.49 ± 0.05 mag and GR = 0.04 ± 0.05 for the IAU phase function as defined in Bowell et al. (1989). Photometry obtained at phase angles of α < 5◦, where c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 6 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass an opposition surge effect is expected, are included in the derivation of the IAU phase function but omitted from the derivation of the linear phase function. We plot our best-fit solutions in Figure 3. A modest amount of scatter around our solutions is present, as expected, but in all cases the deviations from the best-fit phase functions are consistent with expected brightness fluctuations due to 133P's rotation. Due to the uncertainty of the active status of 133P on 2008 July 01 (§3.1), the photometry from that night is plotted but was not included in the computation of the best-fit phase functions. While the slope parameters of both newly-derived functions are consistent with the parame- ters computed in Hsieh et al. (2004) (β = 0.044 ± 0.007 mag deg−1; GR = 0.026 ± 0.1), both newly-derived absolute magnitudes are ∼0.2 mag fainter than their previously derived values (mR(1, 1, 0) = 15.61 ± 0.01 mag; HR = 15.3 ± 0.1 mag), strongly suggesting that the previously derived parameters were affected by contamination by 133P's dust emission. This contamination is assumed to consist of a combination of coma and the portion of the dust trail (as projected in the plane of the sky) contained within the seeing disc. This suggestion of dust contamination is rein- forced by Figure 3 where we note that photometry from both 133P's 2002 and 2007 active phases are consistently brighter than expected from our new phase function solutions. Because most of the data points from 2002 and 2007 are mean magnitudes derived from fully sampled lightcurves, brightness fluctuations due to rotation cannot account for the discrepancies. Assuming that the discrepancy between an observed magnitude, mmid, and expected magnitude, (cid:33) (cid:32) Ad An (cid:16) (cid:17) 100.4(mexp−mmid) − 1 mexp, is due to dust contamination, the scattering surface area of the dust, Ad, is given by Ad = An = An (3) e = 1.13 × 107 m2 is the scattering cross-section of the nucleus (Hsieh et al. 2009), where An = πr2 and albedos of the nucleus and dust are assumed to be equal. Assuming optically thin dust, the (cid:33) total dust mass, Md, can then be estimated from Md ∼ 4 (4) where we adopt typical dust grain radii of ad = 10 µm and a bulk grain density of ρd = 1300 kg m−3 (cf. Hsieh et al. 2004). (cid:32) Ad 3 πρa3 πa2 d d For reference, we also compute A f ρ (cf. A'Hearn et al. 1984) for each set of observations where the parameter is given by 100.4[m(cid:12)−mR(R,∆,0)] (2R∆)2 ρ A f ρ = (5) where R is in AU, ∆ is in cm, ρ is the physical radius in cm of a 4.(cid:48)(cid:48)0-radius photometry aperture c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 7 at the distance of the comet, and mR(R, ∆, 0) is the phase-angle-corrected R-band magnitude of the comet measured using a 4.(cid:48)(cid:48)0-radius aperture, which we calculate using mR(R, ∆, 0) = mmid(R, ∆, α) + 2.5 log [(1 − G)Φ1(α) + GΦ2(α)] (6) (cid:34) (cid:34) Φ1 = exp Φ2 = exp (cid:19)0.63(cid:35) (cid:19)1.22(cid:35) where Φ1 and Φ2 are given by (cid:18) (cid:18) −3.33 −1.87 tan α 2 tan α 2 (7) (8) (Bowell et al. 1989). Using Equations 3, 4, and 5, we compute Ad, Md, and A f ρ for each set of observations from 2002 and 2007 during which 133P was observed to be active, and tabulate the results in Table 2. We find that for data from 2002, dust contamination is approximately constant with a scatter- ing surface area of ∼0.20An and a dust mass of Md ∼ 4 × 104 kg contained within ∼3 arcsec (∼4500 km in August-November; ∼6500 km in December) photometry apertures. The relatively constant amount of dust over this time period explains why we were able to derive reasonably accurate slope parameters for 133P from our 2002 data despite arriving at incorrect results for the comet's absolute magnitude due to the dust contamination. In data from July 2007, we find that 133P's inferred dust coma has a strength comparable to that observed in 2002, having a scattering surface area equivalent to ∼0.25An and a dust mass of Md ∼ 5× 104 kg contained within ∼4 arcsec (∼4700 km) photometry apertures. The slightly larger amount of inferred dust in 2007 could indicate a higher rate of dust production, but could also be due to different viewing geometries, given that 133P was close to opposition when observed in July 2007. At this position, the antisolar vector for 133P points very nearly directly behind the object as seen from Earth, causing more of the dust trail to be located within the seeing disc of the comet as projected on the sky. Given the limitations of our observations, however, we are unable to disentangle this possible projection effect from any intrinsic increase in dust production. Addi- tionally, 133P's apparent brightness could also have been enhanced by an opposition surge effect from the dust in its coma, though we unfortunately lack observational constraints for quantifying this effect. Given these various possible contributing factors to 133P's enhanced brightness on 2007 July 17 and 20, we are unable to determine whether 133P was more active on these dates compared to 2002 August 19 through 2002 November 7. We can conclude, however, that coma contamination c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 8 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass is present in nucleus photometry performed for 133P during both observing periods, and that the measured magnitude enhancements suggest at least comparable levels of activity in each case. The remainder of our photometry from 133P's 2007 active phase is derived from incomplete lightcurve information, and as such, coma estimates at these times have much larger uncertainties than at other times. We find no definitive evidence of a coma on 2007 May 19, but find that the inferred comae on 2007 Aug 18 and 2007 Sep 12 are far stronger (∼0.65An) than in any other observations, a rather unexpected discovery given the minimal amount of time elapsed since our 2007 July observations. We suggest that the large inferred dust contribution to nucleus photometry in August and September could be at least partly due to geometric effects. As can be seen in Figures 1q-1s, the orientation of the projection of the dust trail appears to change over this period of time. We caution that poor seeing during our August and September observations and the small aperture (1.3 m) of the telescope used to obtain these data mean that the observed morphology (namely, the near-disappearance of the dust trail) cannot be considered entirely reliable. If the observed morphology is believed, however, much of the precipitous increase in 133P's apparent coma strength between July and August could be due to the dust trail becoming almost directly aligned behind the nucleus in August and September, thus becoming unavoidably included within our photometry apertures. We can account for this viewing geometry effect by integrating the scattering surface area of the visible dust trail measured in July data (discussed below; §3.4) and then assuming that it all falls within the photometry aperture used to measure the nucleus magnitudes in August and September. The net increase in dust scattering surface area implied by photometry between 2007 July 20 and 2007 August 18 is ∼0.40An. The integrated scattering surface area of the dust trail on 2007 July 20 over the first 30 arcsec from the nucleus (the trail becomes too faint to measure reliably beyond this point), however, is ∼0.20An, accounting for only about half of the observed increase in dust contamination between July and August. The remainder of the observed increase could be partly due to distant material in the dust trail that was too diffuse to detect in trail form in July data, but nevertheless contributed positively to nucleus photometry when projected directly behind the nucleus in August and September. It seems unlikely, however, that half of the dust in the trail could go undetected in our July data, and as such, we surmise that at least part of the increase must in fact be due to a real increase in dust production, which of course would certainly be plausible at this early stage in 133P's active phase. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 9 3.3 The Lightcurve Revisited 3.3.1 Search for Rotational Colour Variations During our 2007 NTT run when 133P was active, we observed the comet in continuously cycling filters (VRI on 2007 July 17 and BVRI on 2007 July 20). Observations were made in this way to allow us to obtain deep imaging of 133P in multiple filters and also construct simultaneous lightcurves in each filter. These lightcurves then allowed us to search for surface colour inhomo- geneities that, for example, may constrain the position of the localised active site hypothesized by Hsieh et al. (2004). These lightcurves, phased to a rotational period of Prot = 3.471 hr (Hsieh et al. 2004), are plotted in Figure 4. To then assess colour variation as a function of rotational phase for each filter pair, we use linear interpolation to obtain the magnitudes of the object in the second filter at times of observations in the first filter and then plot the differences (Fig. 5), again phased to Prot = 3.471 hr. We find mean nucleus colours of B − V = 0.65 ± 0.03 mag, V − R = 0.36 ± 0.01 mag, and R − I = 0.32 ± 0.01 mag. These values are somewhat different from the mean colours found for 133P by Hsieh et al. (2004), but are within the range of individual values measured in that work. We regard the colour measurements presented here to be more accurate since our repeated multifilter observations of 133P here allowed us to account for both rotational magnitude variations (via lightcurve interpolation) and minor extinction variability (using field stars as references for making differential photometric corrections). The single sets of multifilter observations used to make 133P's previous colour measurements did not permit either of these corrective measures. Upon examining individual colour measurements, we find no conclusive evidence of rotational colour inhomogeneity. We find maximum colour variations of only ∆(B − V) = 0.11 ± 0.13 mag, ∆(V−R) = 0.06±0.07 mag, and ∆(R−I) = 0.08±0.08 mag, where the non-systematic distribution of even these small variations indicates that they are most likely due to ordinary measurement uncertainties. We note that this result does not rule out the possibility that 133P's active area exhibits a different colour signature than inactive surface material. First, the coma that is likely present (§3.2) should act to obscure colour variations on the nucleus surface, with the precise amount of obscuration varying with rotational phase as the ratio of the nucleus's scattering cross- section to the coma's cross-section changes. Furthermore, under the seasonal heating hypothesis (Hsieh et al. 2004; Hsieh & Jewitt 2006a), the active site is in fact expected to be illuminated by the Sun at all rotational phases when near perihelion (assumed to be close to solstice) when these observations were made. The nucleus c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 10 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass orientation at this time allows the active site to receive maximal solar heating but also means that the active site is always in the line of sight as viewed from Earth. We suggest that more favourable conditions for detecting colour inhomogeneities will occur around 133P's next pre- perihelion equinox (likely near ν ∼ 270◦). Based on prior observations (§3.1), the nucleus should be largely coma-free over this portion of the orbit, and at equinox, the active site should pass into and out of the line of sight as the nucleus rotates, maximising any colour variations. We therefore encourage additional rotationally-resolved colour measurements of 133P between late 2011 and early 2012. 3.3.2 Implications for 133P's Pole Orientation For reference, we remove the estimated dust contamination from both our 2002 and 2007 lightcurve data, and overplot the two sets of lightcurves (Fig. 6). Each of the two sets of data are phased self- consistently to Prot = 3.471 hr, though given the great difficulty of phasing data together that are separated by almost 5 years to such a short rotational period, the 2002 and 2007 data are simply aligned by eye. Due to the two-peaked nature of 133P's lightcurve, though, there is an ambiguity in performing this alignment. In one case (Fig. 6a), the data can be aligned such that the lightcurve shape and photometric range appear largely unchanged between the two observation epochs. In the second case (Fig. 6b), the data can be aligned such that the photometric range of lightcurve appears to decline to ∆mR ∼ 0.25 mag in 2007 from ∆mR ∼ 0.35 mag in 2002. In the latter case, it should be recalled that the coma contribution to the data plotted has already been subtracted, and as such the change in photometric range cannot be attributed to differences in the amount of coma. Unfortunately, due to the incomplete sampling of the lightcurve in 2007, it is not possible to resolve the ambiguity between these two cases. This ambiguity is significant because of the implications of photometric range behaviour for the orientation of 133P's rotational pole. To gain more insight as to how the photometric range of 133P should change depending on pole orientation and observing geometry, we simulate its lightcurve behaviour using the model presented in Lacerda & Jewitt (2007). We assume a simple prolate ellipsoidal shape for the nucleus of 133P and render it at various observing geometries and rotational phases. At each rotational phase, the light reflected back to the observer is integrated to generate lightcurve points. The 2002 September coma-corrected photometric range for 133P was measured to be ∆mR = 0.35 mag, and so we use a nucleus axis ratio of a/b = 100.4∆mR = 1.39 (it should be noted that this is a lower limit due to the unknown projection angle at the time). We use c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 11 a Lommel-Seeliger "lunar" scattering function (cf. Fairbairn 2005) which has no free parameters and is appropriate for simulating the low albedo (pR = 0.05 ± 0.02; Hsieh et al. 2009) surface of 133P. To simplify the geometry, we neglect the small orbital inclination (i = 1.4◦) of 133P and assume that it is coplanar with the Earth (i.e., i = 0◦). The seasonal heating hypothesis implies that 133P is at solstice when close to perihelion, i.e. has a true anomaly at solstice of νsol ≈ 0◦, and also requires that the object have non-zero obliquity (ε (cid:44) 0◦). In principle, νsol could potentially have any value from νsol ≈ 0◦ to νsol ≈ 45◦, since the temperature of the hemisphere where 133P's active site is located will begin to rise due to solar heating before the spin axis direction is actually aligned with the Sun. The seasonal heating hypothesis is inconsistent, however, for pole orientations for which νsol ≈ 90◦, or ε = 0◦. We simulate the lightcurve behaviour of 133P for νsol = 0◦, νsol = 40◦ and νsol = 90◦. The first and third pole orientations are limiting cases that are consistent and inconsistent with the seasonal heating hypothesis, respectively. The intermediate geometry, in which solstice is reached approximately half-way through the active portion of the orbit, is meant to test how sensitive we are to the exact longitude of the pole. Because we assume zero orbital inclination, each case sets the ecliptic longitude of pole, and the ecliptic latitude is defined by the choice of obliquity. We simulate obliquities of ε = 0◦, ε = 10◦, ε = 20◦ and ε = 30◦. Only ε = 0◦ is inconsistent with the seasonal hypothesis. Rendered samples of 133P, where we assume ε = 30◦, are shown in Figures 7, 8 and 9. Figure 10 shows the expected photometric range in 2002 September and 2007 July for each pole orientation. As expected, the photometric range changes in opposite directions for νsol = 0◦ and νsol = 90◦, whereas the intermediate pole orientation (νsol = 40◦) produces only a small change between the two epochs. The absolute value of ∆mR in the figure depends on the assumed axis ratio and is unimportant in this analysis, in which we are primarily concerned with relative changes. The key feature is the variation of the range between the two epochs. The two possible scenarios indicated by the data (cf. Fig. 6) are where (a) both the 2002 and 2007 photometric ranges are similar (∆mR ∼ 0.35 mag), or (b) the 2002 photometric range (∆mR ∼ 0.35 mag) is larger than the 2007 range (∆mR ∼ 0.25 mag). Inspection of Figure 10 shows that the first scenario is consistent with low obliquity (ε (cid:46) 10◦) and any of the considered pole orientations. The second scenario is only consistent with a solstice around νsol = 0◦ and significant obliquity (ε (cid:38) 20◦). Both scenarios rule out a pole orientation where νsol = 90◦ if there is also significant obliquity. Clearly, additional and more complete lightcurve observations at different points in 133P's or- bit are needed to clarify how 133P's photometric range varies with orbit position, constrain the c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 12 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass object's pole orientation, and determine whether the seasonal heating hypothesis remains plausi- ble. Given our current data, we can neither confirm nor reject the plausibility of seasonal activity modulation as described by Hsieh et al. (2004). While the pattern of activity of 133P along its orbit appears consistent with the seasonal heating hypothesis, the discovery of an incompatible pole solution could indicate that activity is in fact modulated by factors other than obliquity, e.g., shadowing of the active site by crater walls or other local topographic features. In Figure 11, we use our model to forecast the photometric range behaviour of 133P over 1.5 orbits from its peri- helion passage in 2007 August and to its aphelion passage in 2016 January. We plot solutions for four pole positions, two consistent with the seasonal heating hypothesis ( ε = 20◦, νsol = 0◦, and ε = 20◦, νsol = 40◦) and two inconsistent with that hypothesis (ε = 20◦, νsol = 90◦, and ε = 0◦). The observability of 133P during this period is also indicated in the figure, and should assist in planning observations that are best-suited for discriminating between the various pole orientations that we consider here. 3.4 The Dust Trail Revisited To produce deep composite images from our 2007 NTT data, we use linear interpolation to shift the multiple images obtained in each filter to align the photocenters of the nucleus in each image, and sum the resulting shifted images. To measure the surface brightness profiles of the dust trail in these composite images, we then rotate the images to make the trail horizontal in the image frames, and measure the net flux in rectangular apertures placed along the length of the trail (cf. Hsieh et al. 2004). The dimensions of these equally-sized apertures are set to lengths (along the direction of the trail) of 5 pixels, and widths (perpendicular to the trail) of 6 pixels (approximately equal to the FWHM of the trail cross-section on each night). The net fluxes in these apertures are then converted to net fluxes per linear arcsec (as measured along the length of the trail) and normalised with respect to the total net flux of the nucleus. We plot the resulting surface brightness profiles for both 2007 Jul 17 and 2007 Jul 20 in Fig- ure 12. From these plots, we see that the trail profile does not change significantly between the two nights. We also note that there are minimal differences in the profiles of the trail as observed in different filters, indicating that the colours of the dust along the trail are consistently similar to those of the nucleus. To quantify this observation, we measure the surface brightness of the trail as observed on 2007 July 20 in each filter in a single aperture approximately 5 arcsec (15 pixels, or ∼6000 km) in length and 1 arcsec (3 pixels or ∼1200 km) in width placed along the c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 13 trail. Seeking to minimise the effect of the nucleus on our trail photometry, we place the nearest edge of this aperture ∼3.0 arcsec from the nucleus photocentre. We find surface brightnesses of ΣB = 24.88± 0.17 mag arcsec−2, ΣV = 24.35± 0.05 mag arcsec−2, ΣR = 24.04± 0.05 mag arcsec−2, and ΣI = 23.70 ± 0.07 mag arcsec−2, giving colours of B − V = 0.53 ± 0.18 mag arcsec−2, V − R = 0.31 ± 0.07 mag arcsec−2, and R − I = 0.34 ± 0.09 mag arcsec−2, consistent with the colours of the nucleus found in §3.3. We also wish to know how trail morphology changes between 133P's 2002 and 2007 active episodes. The most obvious difference between the two observing epochs is that the dust trail of 133P is significantly shorter in our 2007 data than in 2002 (despite composite images from each epoch being of approximately equivalent effective exposure time), extending only ∼30 arcsec from the nucleus in 2007 observations, compared to nearly 3 arcmin in 2002 (Hsieh et al. 2004). In terms of trail width, the observed mean FWHM of the trail on 2002 Sep 07 over the first 10 arcsec of the trail, as measured from the edge of the nucleus's seeing disc (taken to be 2.5× the FWHM seeing), was measured to be θo = 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)3. This observed value corresponds to an intrinsic FWHM of θi = 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)9 (∼1300 km in the plane of the sky), which is computed using o − θ2 (9) s)1/2 θi = (θ2 where the FWHM seeing was θs = 0.(cid:48)(cid:48)9 on 2002 Sep 07. For comparison, the observed FWHM of the trail on 2007 July 17 was θo = 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)9, corresponding to θi = 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)3 (∼1500 km in the plane of the sky), where θs = 1.(cid:48)(cid:48)4. Given that viewing geometries (parametrized by out-of-plane viewing angles, αpl) in 2002 and 2007 were comparable, we therefore find that the computed intrinsic width of the dust trail is approximately equal in both our 2002 and 2007 observations. As Hsieh et al. (2004) found the primary factor controlling 133P's trail width to be particle ejection velocity, this result suggests that sublimation took place with comparable intensity in both 2002 and 2007. In order to further compare 133P's activity level in 2002 and 2007, we measure the profile of 133P's trail in R-band data from 2002 September 07 using the procedure described above, i.e., using rectangular apertures placed along the length of the trail with lengths of 5 pixels and widths of 6 pixels each. We then compare the resulting profile to the mean R-band trail profile from 2007 (Fig. 13), finding that the trail is noticeably weaker in 2007 than it was in 2002. The difference in trail strength in 2002 and 2007 could be due to several factors. The simplest explanation is that the activity was actually weaker in 2007 due to depletion of exposed volatile material on 133P by the previous outburst. This explanation, however, is at odds with our findings of comparable dust ejection velocities for the two observing epochs (above), and comparable dust c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass 14 enhancement of the nucleus brightness (§3.2). A more likely explanation is that by the time our 2007 NTT observations were made, 133P was no more than 4 months into its current active phase, whereas it had been active for about a year by the time it was observed on 2002 September 07. Thus, 133P may simply have not yet reached its peak level of activity by the time we observed it with the NTT in 2007. The position of 133P near opposition on 2007 July 17 and 20 also meant that a dust trail pointed in the antisolar direction would be highly projected in the sky, which would additionally explain why the trail appeared to be so much shorter in 2007 than in 2002. 4 SUMMARY Key results are as follows: (i) Monitoring observations of 133P show no evidence of activity from UT 2003 September 22 through UT 2007 March 21. This result is consistent with the seasonal activity modulation hypothesis proposed by Hsieh et al. (2004) which predicted that, following its 2002 outburst, 133P should remain inactive until approximately late 2007. (ii) A recomputation of 133P's phase function parameters using inactive data yielded the new IAU phase function parameters of HR = 15.49 ± 0.05 mag and GR = 0.04 ± 0.05, and linear phase function parameters of mR(1, 1, 0) = 15.80 ± 0.05 mag and β = 0.041 ± 0.005 mag deg−1. While these new values for GR and β are similar to the values computed by Hsieh et al. (2004), the values for HR and mR(1, 1, 0) computed here are ∼0.2 mag fainter than previously derived values, a discrepancy we attribute to previously undetected dust contamination. (iii) Comparison of 133P's newly-computed IAU phase function with rotationally-averaged magnitudes found during its 2002 active outburst reveals the presence of unresolved coma with a dust scattering surface area on the order of ∼0.20 of the nucleus cross-section. Similarly, un- resolved coma and trail material on the order of ∼0.25 of the nucleus cross-section is found in images taken on 2007 July 17 and 20, increasing to ∼0.65 of the nucleus cross-section in August and September as the dust trail appears to become projected almost directly behind the nucleus as viewed from Earth. (iv) From NTT observations obtained in 2007, we find mean nucleus colours of B− V = 0.65± 0.03, V − R = 0.36 ± 0.01, and R − I = 0.32 ± 0.01, and no evidence of colour inhomogeneities on 133P's surface (though we hypothesize that inhomogeneities will be more effectively searched for between late 2011 and early 2012). Additionally, we find from the same observations that the dust trail shares approximately the same colours as the nucleus. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 15 (v) Examination of coma-corrected lightcurve data for 133P from 2002 and 2007 indicates a possible reduction of photometric range from ∆mR ∼ 0.35 mag in 2002 to ∆mR ∼ 0.25 mag in 2007, though this result is inconclusive due to incomplete sampling of the lightcurve in 2007. Additional observations will be needed to determine how 133P's photometric range actually varies with orbital position and what implications these variations have for constraining the object's pole orientation. Our present constraints on pole orientation do not currently permit us to confirm or reject obliquity-related seasonal activity modulation as a plausible mechanism for explaining 133P's active behaviour. (vi) While 133P's dust trail appears shorter and weaker in 2007 data as compared to 2002 data, other measures of activity strength (dust ejection velocity and dust contamination of nucleus photometry) during the two outburst events are found to remain roughly constant. We suggest that the weaker trail observed in 2007 could simply be due to the fact that observations were made at an earlier stage in 133P's active phase than in 2002, and find that there is no conclusive evidence of any substantial decrease in activity strength between 2002 and 2007. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank John Dvorak, Dave Brennen, Dan Birchall, Ian Renaud-Kim, and Jon Archambeau at the UH 2.2-m, Greg Wirth, Cynthia Wilburn, and Gary Punawai at Keck, Michelle Buxton and various queue observers at NOAO, and Leonardo Gallegos at the NTT for their assistance with our observations, and Matthew Knight for a prompt and helpful review. We appreciate support of this work through STFC fellowship grant ST/F011016/1 to HHH, NASA planetary astronomy grants to DJ and SCL, a Royal Society Newton Fellowship grant to PL, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, and the European Southern Observatory. REFERENCES A'Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., Millis, R. L., Feldman, P. D., & Thompson, D. T. 1984, AJ, 89, 579 Boehnhardt, H., Schulz, R., Tozzi, G. P., Rauer, H., & Sekanina, Z. 1996, IAUC 6495, 2 Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., Lumme, K., Peltoniemi, J., & Harris, A. W. 1989, Aster- oids II, 524 Bus, S. J., Bowell, E., & French, L. M. 1988, IAUC 4684, 2 c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 16 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Buzzoni, B., Delabre, B., Dekker, H., Dodorico, S., Enard, D., Focardi, P., Gustafsson, B., Nees, W., Paureau, J., & Reiss, R. 1984, The ESO Messenger, 38, 9 Dekker, H., Delabre, B., & Dodorico, S. 1986, Proc. SPIE, 627, 339 Elst, E. W., Pizarro, O., Pollas, C., Ticha, J., Tichy, M., Moravec, Z., Offutt, W., & Marsden, B. G. 1996, IAUC 6496 Fairbairn, M. B. 2005, JRASC, 99, 92 Garradd, G. J., Sostero, G., Camilleri, P., Guido, E., Jacques, C., & Pimentel, E. 2008, IAUC 8969, 1 Hammergren, M. 1996, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 28, 1299 Hartmann, W., Tholen, D., Meech, K., & Cruikshank, D. 1990, Icarus, 83, 1 Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2006a, IAU Symposium, 229, 425 Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2006b, Science, 312, 561 Hsieh, H. H., Jewitt, D. C., & Fern´andez, Y. R. 2004, AJ, 127, 2997 Hsieh, H. H., Jewitt, D., & Fern´andez, Y. R. 2009, ApJ, 694, L111 Hsieh, H. H., Jewitt, D., & Pittichov´a, J. 2006, IAUC 8704, 3 Jewitt, D., Lacerda, P., & Peixinho, N. 2007, IAUC 8847, 1 Jewitt, D., Yang, B., & Haghighipour, N. 2009, AJ, 137, 4313 Kres´ak, L. 1980, Moon and Planets, 22, 83 Lacerda, P., & Jewitt, D. C. 2007, AJ, 133, 1393 Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340 Lowry, S. C., & Fitzsimmons, A. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 641 Meech, K. J., & Belton, M. J. S. 1989, IAUC, 4770, 1 Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., Cromer, J., Dingizian, A., Harris, F. H., Labrecque, S., Lucinio, R., Schaal, W., Epps, H., & Miller, J. 1995, PASP, 107, 375 Pravec, P., & Sekanina, Z. 1996, IAUC 6459, 1 Read, M. T., Bressi, T.H., Gehrels, T., Scotti, J. V., & Christensen, E. J. 2005, IAUC 8624, 1 Tholen, D. J., Hartmann, W. K., Cruikshank, D. P., Lilly, S., Bowell, E., & Hewitt, A. 1988, IAUC 4554, 2 Vaghi, S. 1973, A&A, 24, 107 c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Table 1. Observations of 133P/Elst-Pizarro Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 17 UT Date 2001 Nov 23 2002 Aug 19l 2002 Sep 07k 2002 Sep 08k 2002 Sep 09k 2002 Nov 05k 2002 Nov 06k 2002 Nov 07k 2002 Dec 27k 2002 Dec 28k 2003 Sep 22k 2003 Dec 13 2003 Dec 15 2004 Feb 16 2004 Sep 11 2004 Oct 10 2005 Jan 16 2005 Apr 10 2005 May 27 2005 May 28 2005 Dec 27 2006 Apr 23 2006 May 22 2006 May 23 2006 May 25 2007 Mar 21 2007 May 19 2007 Jun 29 2007 Jul 17 2007 Jul 20 2007 Aug 18 2007 Sep 12 2008 Jul 01 2010 Apr 20 2013 Feb 09 Tel.a Nb tc Filters d mR e mmid f θs Perihelion UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 Keck UH2.2 UH2.2 Keck Aphelion Keck UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 UH2.2 Perihelion NTT NTT CT1.3 CT1.3 NTT Aphelion Perihelion ... 6 14 6 14 5 5 4 20 11 9 3 3 1 ... 2 2 4 4 4 12 4 4 2 2 4 11 ... 41 54 70 69 2 ... ... ... 2500 4200 1800 4200 1500 1500 1200 6000 3300 900 900 900 300 ... 200 600 1200 1200 1200 3600 1200 1200 600 600 1200 3300 ... 2460 3240 4200 4140 600 ... ... ... R R R BVRI R R R BVRI BVRI BVR R R R ... R R R R R R R R R R R R ... VRI BVRI R R R ... ... ... ... 20.05±0.02 19.71±0.01 19.71±0.02 19.63±0.05 20.28±0.03 20.13±0.03 20.28±0.03 21.14±0.04 21.19±0.05 21.71±0.06 20.45±0.04 20.70±0.06 21.69±0.06 22.15±0.04 20.99±0.05 21.86±0.12 22.03±0.20 22.08±0.21 21.70±0.06 20.09±0.04 20.84±0.05 20.73±0.05 21.04±0.11 21.15±0.11 20.19±0.02 18.59±0.02 18.53±0.01 19.08±0.04 19.63±0.05 21.42±0.21 ... ... ... 20.05±0.10 19.70±0.05 19.70±0.05 19.70±0.05 20.25±0.05 20.25±0.05 20.25±0.05 21.20±0.05 21.20±0.05 21.71±0.15 20.45±0.20 20.70±0.20 21.69±0.20 22.15±0.20 20.99±0.20 21.86±0.15 22.03±0.20 22.08±0.21 21.72±0.10 20.09±0.15 20.84±0.15 20.73±0.20 21.04±0.20 21.15±0.15 20.10±0.10 18.65±0.05 18.55±0.05 19.10±0.10 19.60±0.10 21.42±0.21 ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.2 1.2 ... 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.2 ... 1.4 1.1 1.8 1.4 1.2 ... ... νg 0.0 63.3 67.2 67.4 67.6 79.1 79.3 79.4 88.9 89.1 133.7 144.3 144.5 153.1 180.0 183.8 196.4 207.5 213.8 213.9 245.3 265.1 270.4 270.6 270.9 335.5 349.9 0.0 4.5 5.2 12.3 18.4 82.8 180.0 0.0 Rh 2.64 2.86 2.89 2.89 2.89 2.98 2.98 2.98 3.06 3.06 3.46 3.54 3.55 3.60 3.68 3.68 3.65 3.60 3.56 3.56 3.30 3.12 3.07 3.07 3.07 2.68 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.66 3.01 3.68 2.64 ∆i 3.34 2.05 1.94 1.93 1.93 2.18 2.19 2.21 2.93 2.95 3.19 2.56 2.57 3.24 4.33 3.96 2.70 3.22 3.85 3.87 3.31 2.16 2.36 2.37 2.39 2.81 2.04 1.68 1.63 1.63 1.74 1.97 3.27 3.93 3.55 α j 13.5 14.5 8.2 7.8 7.6 13.3 13.6 13.8 18.7 18.7 16.8 1.5 2.1 15.5 11.1 14.4 4.7 15.7 15.0 15.0 17.1 7.1 15.4 15.6 16.0 20.7 20.1 9.0 1.7 0.6 11.6 18.4 18.1 14.7 7.5 k αpl 0.4 –0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 –0.3 –0.4 –0.4 0.4 –0.5 –0.6 –0.6 –0.6 –0.2 –0.7 –0.7 –0.6 –0.6 –0.2 0.1 –0.4 –0.3 0.1 a Telescope used (UH2.2: University of Hawaii 2.2-m telescope; Keck: Keck I 10-m telescope; NTT: 3.58-m New Technology Telescope; CT1.3: SMARTS 1.3-m telescope at Cerro Tololo ) b Number of images c Total effective exposure time in seconds d Observed mean R-band magnitude of nucleus e Estimated R-band magnitude at midpoint of full photometric range (assumed to be 0.40 mag) of rotational lightcurve f FWHM seeing in arcsec g True anomaly in degrees h Median heliocentric distance in AU i Median geocentric distance in AU j Solar phase angle in degrees k Orbit plane angle (between the observer and object orbit plane as seen from the object) in degrees l Hsieh et al. (2004) c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 18 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Table 2. Dust Contribution to 133P Photometry UT Date Obs.a 2002 Aug 19 2002 Sep 07-09 2002 Nov 05-07 2002 Dec 27-28 2007 May 19 2007 Jul 17 2007 Jul 20 2007 Aug 18 2007 Sep 12 LC LC LC LC SS LC LC SS SS b mmid 20.05±0.10 19.70±0.05 20.25±0.05 21.20±0.05 20.10±0.10 18.65±0.05 18.55±0.05 19.10±0.10 19.60±0.10 c mexp 20.26±0.05 19.88±0.05 20.43±0.05 21.35±0.05 20.30±0.05 18.90±0.05 18.79±0.05 19.62±0.05 20.17±0.05 d Adust/Anucl 0.21±0.08 0.18±0.08 0.18±0.08 0.20±0.08 0.20±0.13 0.26±0.08 0.25±0.08 0.61±0.18 0.69±0.18 e Adust 2.4±0.9 2.0±0.9 2.0±0.9 2.3±0.9 2.3±1.5 2.9±1.0 2.8±1.0 6.9±2.0 7.8±2.1 f Mdust 4.2±1.6 3.5±1.6 3.5±1.6 4.0±1.6 4.0±2.6 5.1±1.7 4.9±1.6 12.0±3.4 13.5±3.6 A f ρg 17.4±0.8 17.5±0.8 16.3±0.8 12.1±0.6 17.4±1.6 22.7±1.0 22.3±1.0 27.3±2.5 25.3±2.3 a Type of observations (LC: observations of complete lightcurve; SS: snapshot observations at unknown rotational phase) b Estimated R-band magnitude at midpoint of full photometric range (assumed to be 0.40 mag) of rotational lightcurve c Expected R-band magnitude using best-fit IAU phase function d Inferred ratio of scattering surface area of dust to nucleus scattering surface area e Inferred scattering surface area of dust, in 106 m2, using Anucl = 1.13 × 107 m2 f Estimated dust mass, in 104 kg, assuming 10 µm-radius grains and ρ = 1300 kg m−3 g Dust contribution inside 4.(cid:48)(cid:48)0 aperture, as parametrized by A'Hearn et al. (1984) c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/ LATEX file prepared by the author. Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 19 c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 20 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 1. Composite images of 133P, from R-band images taken during observations detailed in Table 1. Each image is 0.(cid:48)5 × 0.(cid:48)5 with 133P at the center and arrows indicating North (N), East (E), the negative heliocentric velocity vector (−v), and the direction toward the Sun ((cid:12)). Composite images are constructed from UH 2.2-m data unless otherwise stated and comprise total effective exposure times of (a) 2300 s, (b) 2100 s, (c) 4200 s, (d) 4200 s, (e) 500 s (on Keck, equivalent to 10330 s on the UH 2.2-m), (f) 900 s, (g) 300 s (on Keck, equivalent to 6200 s on the UH 2.2-m), (h) 200 s (on Keck, equivalent to 4130 s on the UH 2.2-m), (i) 600 s, (j) 1200 s, (k) 1200 s, (l) 1200 s, (m) 1200 s, (n) 1200 s, (o) 1200 s, (p) 3300 s, (q) 900 s (on the NTT, equivalent to 2380 s on the UH 2.2-m), (r) 4200 s (on the CT 1.3-m, equivalent to 1470 s on the UH 2.2-m), (s) 4140 s (on the CT 1.3-m, equivalent to 1450 s on the UH 2.2-m), and (t) 600 s (on the NTT, equivalent to 1590 s on the UH 2.2-m). Data in panels (a) through (e) were previously presented in Hsieh et al. (2004) c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 21 Figure 2. Orbital position plot of reported 133P observations detailed in Table 1 and in Hsieh et al. (2004). The Sun is shown at the center as a solid dot, with the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, 133P, and Jupiter (from the center of the plot outwards) are shown as black lines. Solid triangles mark positions where 133P was observed to be active in 1996, while solid squares mark active positions in 2002, and solid circles mark active positions in 2007. Open squares mark positions where no activity was detected in 133P between 2003 and 2007, while the open circle marks the position where 133P was observed to be inactive in 2008. Perihelion (P) and aphelion (A) positions are also marked. References: (a) 1996 Jul 14 (Elst et al. 1996); (b) 1996 Aug 09 (Elst et al. 1996); (c) 1996 Aug 21-22 (Elst et al. 1996; Pravec & Sekanina 1996); (d) 1996 Sep 16, 18 (Boehnhardt et al. 1996; Hammergren 1996); (e) 1996 Oct 04 (Boehnhardt et al. 1996); (f) 2002 Jul 13 (Lowry & Fitzsimmons 2005); (g) 2002 Aug 19, 2002 Sep 07-09, 2002 Nov 05-07, and 2002 Dec 27-28 (Hsieh et al. 2004) (h) 2003 Sep 22 (Hsieh et al. 2004); (i) 2003 Dec 13-15; (j) 2004 Feb 16; (k) 2004 Oct 10; (l) 2005 Jan 16; (m) 2005 Apr 10; (n) 2005 May 27-28; (o) 2005 Dec 27; (p) 2006 Apr 23; (q) 2006 May 22-25; (r) 2007 Mar 21; (s) 2007 May 19; (t) 2007 Jun 11 (Jewitt et al. 2007); (u) 2007 Jul 17-20, (v) 2007 Aug 18; (w) 2007 Sep 12; (x) 2008 Jul 01, where (i) – (s) and (u) – (x) are from this work. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 22 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 3. Phase functions for 133P. Points are estimated R-band magnitudes (normalised to heliocentric and geocentric distances of 1 AU; tabulated in Table 1) at the midpoint of the full photometric range of the nucleus's rotational lightcurve. Solid symbols denote photometry obtained while 133P was visibly active, while open symbols denote photometry obtained while 133P appeared to be inactive. The dashed line represents a least-squares fit (excluding photometry points for which α < 5◦ where an opposition surge effect is expected) to a linear phase function where mR(1, 1, 0) = 15.80 ± 0.07 mag and β = 0.041 ± 0.005 mag deg−1. The solid line represents an IAU (H, G) phase function fit where HR = 15.49 ± 0.05 mag and GR = 0.04 ± 0.05, while the dotted lines indicate the expected range of possible magnitude variations (∼0.2 mag) due to the object's rotation. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 23 Figure 4. Simultaneous B-band, V-band, R-band, and I-band lightcurves, phased to a rotation period of Prot = 3.471 hr, for 133P obtained using the NTT on 2007 July 17 and 2007 July 20. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 24 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 5. Interpolated (a) B − V, (b) V − R, and (c) R − I colours, phased to a rotation period of Prot = 3.471 hr, for 133P obtained using the NTT on 2007 July 17 and 2007 July 20 c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 25 Figure 6. R-band lightcurves for 133P obtained using the UH 2.2-m telescope in 2002 (open symbols) and the NTT in 2007 (solid symbols). Data for each year are phased together to a rotation period of Prot = 3.471 hr, after which the two data sets from 2002 and 2007 are aligned by eye. Panels (a) and (b) show the two possible alignments of the 2002 and 2007 data. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 26 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 7. Prolate ellipsoidal representation of 133P rendered as seen from Earth during the September 2002 (upper panel) and July 2007 (lower panel) observing campaigns. The pole orientation is set such that νsol = 0◦ and obliquity is assumed to be ε = 30◦. A white line segment indicates the position and orientation of the rotational pole, and black equator and meridian lines are drawn on 133P's idealised surface to guide the eye. Cross-sections at various rotational phases are displayed from top to bottom along the left of each panel, with the corresponding model light curve plotted in the right portion of each panel. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 27 Figure 8. Prolate ellipsoidal representation of 133P rendered as seen from Earth during the September 2002 (upper panel) and July 2007 (lower panel) observing campaigns. The pole orientation is set such that νsol = 40◦ and obliquity is assumed to be ε = 30◦. A white line segment indicates the position and orientation of the rotational pole, and black equator and meridian lines are drawn on 133P's idealised surface to guide the eye. Cross-sections at various rotational phases are displayed from top to bottom along the left of each panel, with the corresponding model light curve plotted in the right portion of each panel. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 28 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 9. Prolate ellipsoidal representation of 133P rendered as seen from Earth during the September 2002 (upper panel) and July 2007 (lower panel) observing campaigns. The pole orientation is set such that νsol = 90◦ and obliquity is assumed to be ε = 30◦. A white line segment indicates the position and orientation of the rotational pole, and black equator and meridian lines are drawn on 133P's idealised surface to guide the eye. Cross-sections at various rotational phases are displayed from top to bottom along the left of each panel, with the corresponding model light curve plotted in the right portion of each panel. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 29 Figure 10. Expected photometric ranges for 133P during the 2002 September and the 2007 July observing campaigns for pole solutions where (a) νsol = 0◦, (b) νsol = 40◦, and (c) νsol = 90◦. Each panel shows predicted photometric ranges for obliquities ε = 0◦, ε = 10◦, ε = 20◦, and ε = 30◦, as labeled. The seasonal heating hypothesis is consistent with the pole orientations represented in (a) and (b), but not (c). Figure 11. Photometric range for 133P predicted by four different pole solutions for the period between its 2007 July perihelion passage and 2016 January aphelion passage. Dark lines correspond to solutions that are consistent with the seasonal heating hypothesis, while light lines correspond to solutions that are inconsistent with that hypothesis. Grey areas indicate times when 133P is at solar elongations less than 80◦, i.e., approximately when it is observable for fewer than 4 hours in a single night. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 εεεεεεεεεεεεεεεε30 H. H. Hsieh, D. Jewitt, P. Lacerda, S. C. Lowry, and C. Snodgrass Figure 12. Surface brightness profiles of the 133P dust trail, normalised to nucleus brightness, for composite images from observations made on 2007 Jul 17 (900s effective exposure time in each filter) and 2007 Jul 20 (360s effective exposure time in B, and 540 s effective exposure time in V, R, and I) using the NTT. B-band data for 2007 Jul 20 have been truncated beyond 104 km due to contamination from nearby field stars. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19 Return of Activity in Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro 31 Figure 13. Surface brightness profiles of the 133P dust trail, normalised to nucleus brightness, for composite images from observations made on 2002 Sep 07 (3900 s effective exposure time; equivalent to 1475 s on the NTT) using the UH 2.2-m telescope, and 2007 Jul 17 (900 s effective exposure time) and 2007 Jul 20 (540 s effective exposure time) using the NTT. c(cid:13) 2009 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–19
1708.02945	2	1708	2017-10-10T04:35:09	A thermodynamic view of dusty protoplanetary disks	[ "astro-ph.EP" ]	Small solids embedded in gaseous protoplanetary disks are subject to strong dust-gas friction. Consequently, tightly-coupled dust particles almost follow the gas flow. This near conservation of dust-to-gas ratio along streamlines is analogous to the near conservation of entropy along flows of (dust-free) gas with weak heating and cooling. We develop this thermodynamic analogy into a framework to study dusty gas dynamics in protoplanetary disks. We show that an isothermal dusty gas behaves like an adiabatic pure gas; and that finite dust-gas coupling may be regarded as an effective heating/cooling. We exploit this correspondence to deduce that 1) perfectly coupled, thin dust layers cannot cause axisymmetric instabilities; 2) radial dust edges are unstable if the dust is vertically well-mixed; 3) the streaming instability necessarily involves a gas pressure response that lags behind dust density; 4) dust-loading introduces buoyancy forces that generally stabilizes the vertical shear instability associated with global radial temperature gradients. We also discuss dusty analogs of other hydrodynamic processes (e.g. Rossby wave instability, convective overstability, and zombie vortices), and how to simulate dusty protoplanetary disks with minor tweaks to existing codes for pure gas dynamics.	astro-ph.EP	astro-ph	Draft version November 5, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 A THERMODYNAMIC VIEW OF DUSTY PROTOPLANETARY DISKS Min-Kai Lin1,2,3 and Andrew N. Youdin2 Draft version November 5, 2018 ABSTRACT Small solids embedded in gaseous protoplanetary disks are subject to strong dust-gas friction. Conse- quently, tightly-coupled dust particles almost follow the gas flow. This near conservation of dust-to- gas ratio along streamlines is analogous to the near conservation of entropy along flows of (dust-free) gas with weak heating and cooling. We develop this thermodynamic analogy into a framework to study dusty gas dynamics in protoplanetary disks. We show that an isothermal dusty gas behaves like an adiabatic pure gas; and that finite dust-gas coupling may be regarded as an effective heat- ing/cooling. We exploit this correspondence to deduce that 1) perfectly coupled, thin dust layers cannot cause axisymmetric instabilities; 2) radial dust edges are unstable if the dust is vertically well-mixed; 3) the streaming instability necessarily involves a gas pressure response that lags behind dust density; 4) dust-loading introduces buoyancy forces that generally stabilizes the vertical shear instability associated with global radial temperature gradients. We also discuss dusty analogs of other hydrodynamic processes (e.g. Rossby wave instability, convective overstability, and zombie vortices), and how to simulate dusty protoplanetary disks with minor tweaks to existing codes for pure gas dynamics. 1. INTRODUCTION corresponds to tightly-coupled particles. Protoplanetary disks are comprised of a mixture of gas and dust (Chiang & Youdin 2010). Although the overall dust content is small (∼ 1% by mass), their presence can have profound impacts on the gas dynamics and vice versa. Dust-gas friction introduces phenomena that are absent in pure gas disks. Im- portant examples include the streaming instability (SI, Youdin & Goodman 2005; Youdin & Johansen 2007; gravita- Johansen & Youdin 2007), instabilities (SGI, Ward 2000; Youdin 2011; tional Michikoshi et al. 2014, 2016; Latter & Rosca 2017) and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities (Goldreich & Ward 1973; Chiang 2008; Barranco 2009; Lee et al. 2010). 2012; Takahashi & Inutsuka secular These instabilities can trigger turbulence, and (in dif- ferent regimes) promote or inhibit planetesimal forma- tion. More recently, new dusty instabilities have ap- peared in numerical simulations (Lor´en-Aguilar & Bate 2015, 2016; Lambrechts et al. 2016) and analytical cal- culations (Squire & Hopkins 2017; Hopkins & Squire 2017), but their physical underpinnings are not yet well understood. Current state-of-the-art models of dusty protoplan- etary disks directly simulate gas dynamics coupled to explicit Lagrangian dust particles (Johansen et al. 2006; Nelson & Gressel 2010a; Yang & Johansen 2014; Zhu et al. 2014; Gibbons et al. 2015; Simon et al. 2016; Baruteau & Zhu 2016). The equation of motion for each particle is solved including dust-gas drag; the strength of which is measured by a stopping time ts -- the decay timescale for the relative velocity between gas and dust. Thus small ts 2010; Bai & Stone [email protected] 1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 2 Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, Uni- versity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 3 Steward Theory Fellow 2012; 2014; Laibe & Price Another approach is to model the dust population as a continuous, pressureless fluid (Barri`ere-Fouchet et al. 2006; Ayliffe et al. 2005; Paardekooper & Mellema 2012; 2012; Meheut et al. Lor´en-Aguilar & Bate 2014; The hydrodynamic equations Surville et al. 2016). are evolved for two fluids: the gas and dust with density and velocity ρg, vg and ρd, vd, respectively. Source terms are introduced into the momentum/energy equations to model dust-gas drag. This approach can take advantage of existing numerical methods/codes for simulating pure gas dynamics. A practical difficulty with this approach is the need to numerical stabilize the pressureless dust fluid with (e.g.) artificial diffusion. Fu et al. The two-fluid equations for dust and gas can be re- formulated into equivalent dynamical equations for the center of mass velocity v and the relative dust-gas ve- In this re- locity vd − vg (Youdin & Goodman 2005). formulation, continuity equations for dust and gas can be replaced by the mass conservation of total density ρ plus the evolution of the dust-to-gas ratio ρd/ρg (or dust fraction, ρd/ρ, Laibe & Price 2014). This reformulation is particularly advantageous in the tight coupling limit of ts ≪ 1/Ω, where the orbital fre- quency Ω sets the characteristic timescale in many disk dynamics problems. Models with two fluids or with Lagrangian solids are numerically difficult to evaluate in this regime, due to stiff drag forces. In the refor- mulated equations, however, the center of mass mo- tion does not experience drag forces and thus is not stiff. Moreover, for tsΩ ≪ 1 the relative motion sat- isfies the terminal-velocity approximation and can be eliminated from the equations. This single fluid frame- work for a well-coupled dust-gas mixture facilitates nu- merical calculations (Price & Laibe 2015); and also sim- plifies analytic calculations (Youdin & Goodman 2005; Jacquet et al. 2011), which is useful for gaining insight. In this work, we develop a parallel between this single- 2 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin fluid description of dust-gas mixtures and standard hy- drodynamics. Specifically we recast the evolution of the dust-to-gas ratio as an energy equation for the thermal content of a fluid. This parallel is most precise when the gas in the dust/gas mixture obeys a locally isothermal equation of state for the gas, P = c2 sρg, where cs is a pre- scribed sound-speed profile. This isothermal approxima- tion holds when cooling times are short (Lin & Youdin 2015), e.g. in protoplanetary disks whose temperature is set by external irradiation (Chiang & Goldreich 1997; Stamatellos & Whitworth 2008). Under these two approximations of strong drag and isothermal gas, we show that the equations of dusty gas dynamics are equivalent to that of nearly adiabatic (i.e. slowly cooling) gas dynamics without dust, see Fig. 1. The basis of the analogy is that the entrainment of tightly-coupled dust particles in gas flows is similar to the advection of entropy in an adiabatic fluid. Finite dust-gas drag act as effective heating/cooling: the rel- ative drift between dust and gas causes a fluid parcel to exchange dust particles with its surroundings; an ef- fect similar to heat exchange between a gas parcel and its surroundings. Needless to say the effective heating term must have a specific form, which we derive, for the equivalency to hold. The purpose of our physical and mathematical paral- lel between dusty gas and standard hydrodynamics is to gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics and stability of dusty protoplanetary disks. We can apply established methods to generalize previous stability re- sults for pure gas dynamics to dusty disks. We show that strictly isothermal disks with perfectly-coupled dust are generally stable to axisymmetric perturbations, un- less the dust-to-gas ratio varies more rapidly in radius than in height. We put forward a thermodynamical in- terpretation of dust-gas drag instabilities, and apply it to the streaming instability. We also study the effect of dust-loading on the vertical shear instability previously considered in pure gas disks (VSI, Nelson et al. 2013; Lin & Youdin 2015; Barker & Latter 2015). This paper is organized as follows. In §2 we describe a key insight of our study, that pressure (i.e. "PdV") work can explain the basis of several instabilities, including SI and VSI, in terms of pressure-density phase lags. This motivates us to seek an analogy between dust-gas mix- tures and pure gas. We develop our formalism in §3 by transforming the two fluid equations of a tightly-coupled dusty gas into single fluid hydrodynamic equations with a special cooling function. Here we also define the effec- tive entropy and buoyancy of our model fluid. In §4 we discuss general stability properties of dusty disks. We then analyze explicit disk models §5, were we show that radial dust edges are unstable, and revisit the SGI and SI in the tight coupling regime. In §6 we extend the VSI to dusty disks. We discuss future applications of the dusty/adiabatic gas equivalence in §7 before summariz- ing in §8. 2. GROWING OSCILLATIONS BY DOING WORK In this section we provide physical arguments to high- light the similarity between single phase fluids and dust- gas mixtures. The mathematical description of this sec- tion is deferred to §4.4. It is well-known that in the limit of perfect coupling the isothermal gas+dust+drag equivalent for small particles pure gas+cooling Figure 1. The central concept of this work. A mixture of small particles imperfectly coupled to isothermal gas behave similarly to an adiabatic, pure gas subject to cooling. This permits one to use the equations for standard hydrodynamics to study dust-gas dynamics. addition of dust increases the gas inertia but not pres- sure. One can then regard dusty gas as a single fluid with a reduced sound-speed. Here, we argue that when dust- gas coupling is imperfect, there exists another similarity with pure gas; related the phase of pressure and density evolution. Thus it is still possible to regard partially- coupled dusty-gas as a single fluid. A general result in fluid dynamics is that work is done whenever oscillations in the pressure and density of the fluid are not in phase. If the average work done is pos- itive, then oscillation amplitudes grow: the work done allows the system to 'overshoot' beyond the amplitude of preceding oscillations. Fig. 2 gives a graphical demonstration that if pressure lags behind density, then positive is work done because it leads to a clockwise path in the 'P-V' plane. The annotations consider the particular case where the phase lag arises because the fluid has two components (gas and dust, see below) but the following description is general. From A to B, a fluid parcel is expanding to return to equilibrium, but pressure is still increasing. This over- compensation will cause the parcel to expand beyond the maximum volume of the previous cycle. Similarly, from C to D the parcel is already contracting towards equi- librium, but pressure is still dropping. This allows the parcel's contraction to over-shoot the maximum density attained in the previous cycle. The overall positive work done leads to growth in the oscillation amplitude. This effect is similar to being pushed downwards on a swing when descending. There are several situations where the pressure and density of a fluid are not in phase. The obvious case is if the fluid is subject to external heating/cooling. For example, in strongly irradiated protoplanetary disks the disk temperature T (r) is time-independent but varies with the cylindrical radius r from the star (Chiang & Goldreich 1997). Since P ∝ ρgT for an ideal gas, there is no reason to expect P and ρg to be in phase as a gas parcel oscillates between different radii and adopt the corresponding local temperatures. In fact, we will show that this is a fundamental property of the vertical shear instability (Lin & Youdin 2015). Another possibility, as annotated in Fig. 2, is a dusty gas. The relevant density here is the total density ρ = ρd+ρg, but the fluid pressure P is due to gas only. If dust were perfectly-coupled to the gas, then P and ρ would be in phase, and there is no work done. However, for finite dust-gas drag, ρd and ρg are not necessarily in phase, because dust particles can drift relative to the gas, i.e. the dust-to-gas ratio evolves in time. If this causes P to lag ρ, then the positive work done would lead to growing oscillations. Indeed, we show that this is true for the streaming instability. In order to apply this thermodynamic interpretation of dust-gas drag instabilities, we need to develop a formal Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 3 y t i s n e d , e r u s s e r p e r u s s e r p A. density max., pressure increasing (gas in, dust out) C. density min., pressure dropping (gas out, dust in) ρtot=ρgas+ρdust Pgas B. pressure max., density dropping (dust out) D. pressure min., density increasing (dust in) time B A ∫Pdv>0 C D volume Figure 2. Thermodynamic interpretation of growing oscillations in a fluid. Top: pressure and density evolution in time. Bottom: oscillation cycle in the P-V plane. In the case shown, dust-drag causes pressure (due to gas only) to lag behind total density. This results in a clockwise path in the P-V plane, implying positive work done by the fluid, which would increase oscillation amplitudes. analogy between dusty-gas and pure hydrodynamics. We show this is possible in the limit of strong drag and a fixed gas equation of state. 3. SINGLE FLUID DESCRIPTION OF DUSTY GAS We model an accretion disk as a mixture of gas with dust treated as a pressureless fluid. We denote their den- sity and velocity field as (ρg, vg) and (ρd, vd), respec- tively. The mixture has total density and center of mass velocity, ρ ≡ ρg + ρd, ρgvg + ρdvd ρ , v ≡ (1) (2) a single temperature T , and its pressure P arise solely from the gas component. Our goal is to obtain a set of equations describing the dust-gas mixture that resembles standard, single-phase hydrodynamics. The dust and gas fluids interact via a drag force pa- rameterized by the relative stopping time ts such that is the dust-gas friction force per unit volume. Note that ts differs slightly from the particle stopping time τs = tsρ/ρg used in some studies (e.g. Youdin & Goodman 2005). In general a complicated the relative velocity vd − vg obeys e.g. evolutionary equation (see, ρd ∂vd ∂t (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)drag ∂vg ∂t (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)drag = −ρg ρgρd ρ = − (vd − vg) ts . (3) Youdin & Goodman 2005). tightly- coupled dust particles with tsΩK ≪ 1, where ΩK is the Keplerian orbital frequency (since we are interested in protoplanetary disks), we can use the 'terminal velocity approximation' to set However, for vd − vg = ∇P ρg ts (4) (Jacquet et al. 2011). This equation reflects the well- known effect of particle drift towards pressure maximum (Weidenschilling 1977). Under the terminal velocity approximation the dust- gas mixture obeys the first-order (in ts) one-fluid equa- tions: Dρ Dt Dfd Dt Dv Dt DT Dt = −ρ∇ · v, = − 1 ρ∇ · (fdts∇P ) , = −∇Φtot − 1 ρ∇P, = − (γ − 1) T∇ · v + H + Heff − Λ (5) (6) (7) (8) (see Laibe & Price 2014; Price & Laibe 2015, for a de- tailed derivation from the two-fluid equations), where D/Dt ≡ ∂t + v ·∇ is the Lagrangian derivative following the mixture's center-of-mass velocity v. For an ideal gas the pressure is given by P = RρgT /µ, where R is the gas constant and µ is the mean molecular weight. Eq. 6 is obtained from the dust continuity equation, ∂tρd + ∇ · (ρdvd) = 0, by writing vd = v + ts∇P/ρ, and eliminating ρd in favor of the dust fraction fd: fd ≡ ρd ρ = ǫ 1 + ǫ , (9) where ǫ = ρd/ρg is the usual dust-to-gas ratio. If ts = 0 then the dust-to-gas ratio is conserved following the fluid. Otherwise, ǫ evolves due to particle drift in response to pressure gradients. Note that Eq. 6 is equivalent to Eq. 46 of Jacquet et al. (2011). The total gravitational potential Φtot = Φ + ψ includes that from a central star of mass M∗ and the disk's own potential ψ. We adopt Φ(r, z) = − GM∗ √r2 + z2 ≃ − GM∗ r (cid:18)1 − z2 2r2(cid:19) , (10) where (r, φ, z) are cylindrical co-ordinates centered on the star, and G is the gravitational constant. The second equality is the thin-disk approximation, appropriate for z ≪ r. We use this approximate form in order to obtain explicit expressions for disk equilibria (§5.1). The disk potential ψ satisfies the Poisson equation ∇2ψ = 4πGρ. (11) We include ψ for completeness, but we will mostly ne- glect it unless stated otherwise. For the mixture's temperature evolution, Eq. 8, γ is the gas adiabatic index; H represents heating and Heff is an effective source term arising from transforming the gas energy equation (Eq. 17) from the two-fluid to one- fluid variables (see Laibe & Price 2014, for details). We 4 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin also include a simple model of radiative cooling, Λ = T − Tref tcool , (12) which relaxes the mixture back to a prescribed tem- perature profile Tref on a timescale of tcool. We will shortly simplify the problem by considering rapid cool- ing, tcool → 0. Eq. 5 -- 8 are not yet equivalent to standard hydro- dynamics, which typically evolves two scalar fields: the density and temperature (or pressure). By contrast, Eq. 5 -- 8 involves three scalars: ρ, fd, and T . However, we can establish an analogy by fixing the gas equation of state, thus eliminating Eq. 8; but then reform the dust- to-gas ratio evolution equation (6) into an energy-like equation. 3.1. Locally isothermal equation of state We consider the limit of short cooling times, tcool → 0, appropriate for the outer parts of an irradiated proto- planetary disk (Chiang & Goldreich 1997; Lin & Youdin 2015). Then the disk temperature T = Tref at all times, and so we may adopt a locally isothermal equation of state P = c2 s(r, z)ρg = c2 s (1 − fd) ρ, (13) where cs(r, z) =pRTref /µ is a prescribed sound-speed In most applications we consider profile fixed in time. vertically isothermal disks with c2 s(r) ∝ rq, (14) where q is the power-law index for the disk temperature. For q = 0 the disk is strictly isothermal. Notice Eq. 13 resembles an ideal gas equation of state but with a reduced temperature eT = Tref (1 − fd). This reduced temperature decreases with dust-loading. Since fd typically decrease away from the midplane, we expect vertically isothermal dusty disks to behave as if the tem- perature increased away from z = 0. 3.2. Effective energy equation Although we have deleted the true energy equation by fixing a locally isothermal equation of state, we show that the mixture nevertheless obeys an effective energy evo- lution equation. This is because advection of the dust- fraction, described by Eq. 6, can be transformed into an energy-like equation. The equation of state, Eq. 13, implies fd = 1 − P c2 s(r, z)ρ . Then Eq. 6 becomes ∂P ∂t + v · ∇P = −P∇ · v + P v · ∇ ln c2 sρ(cid:19)∇P(cid:21) . s∇ ·(cid:20)ts(cid:18)1 − C ≡ c2 P c2 s + C, (15) (16) with P ∝ ρgT , and reverting back to gas velocities, gives (17) + vg · ∇P = −γP∇ · vg + (H − Λ) . ∂P ∂t P T We can thus interpret Eq. 15 as the energy equation for and ideal gas with adiabatic index γ = 1, but now with the imposed temperature gradient ∇c2 s and dust-gas drag C acting as source terms. If we denote F ≡ −∇P ρ (18) for the pressure forces, then C = −c2 s∇ (fdtsρF ) , which is in the same form as cooling by radiative diffu- In protoplanetary disks the corresponding 'heat sion. flux', proportional to F , is directly radially outwards and vertically upwards. This is simply a reflection of particle drift towards increasing pressure (inwards and downwards). Particle flux into a region contributes to 'cooling' of that region because the reduced temperature is lowered. 3.3. Entropy and buoyancy of isothermal dusty gas The specific entropy of an pacity at constant pressure. S = CP ln(cid:0)P 1/γ/ρg(cid:1), where CP is the heat ca- Since we have shown that a locally isothermal dusty gas effectively has γ = 1 we can define an effective entropy for the mixture as ideal gas is Seff ≡ ln P ρ = ln(cid:2)c2 s(1 − fd)(cid:3), (19) where the constant heat capacity has been absorbed into Seff. Then combining Eq. 15 and 5 gives DSeff Dt = v · ∇ ln c2 s + c2 s P ∇ · (tsfd∇P ) , which is equivalent to entropy evolution in standard hy- drodynamics, albeit with source terms. With an effective entropy defined this way, many of the results concerning the stability of (locally) isothermal dusty gas will have identical form and interpretations to that for pure gas. The physical reason for this analogy is that with strong drag (ts → 0), dust is almost perfectly entrained in the gas, but there is some gain/loss of dust particles between different gas parcels. This is analogous to the entropy of an ideal pure gas subject to heating/cooling: entropy is conserved following a gas parcel, except if there is heat exchange between a fluid parcel and the surrounding. For strictly isothermal gas perfectly coupled to dust (con- stant c2 s and ts = 0) we have DSeff /Dt = Dfd/Dt = 0. In this case the effective entropy is exactly conserved be- cause the dust-fraction is 'frozen in' the flow. We can now define the vertical buoyancy frequency Nz of the mixture as 1 ρ N 2 z ≡ − ∂P ∂z ∂Seff ∂z = c2 s(r) ∂ ln ρg ∂z ∂fd ∂z , (20) For comparison with the standard energy equation in hydrodynamics, re-writing Eq. 8 for a pure ideal gas where the second equality assumes a vertically isothermal disk. Protoplanetary disks have ∂zρg < 0, thus stability Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 5 against vertical convection (N 2 z > 0) requires ∂zfd < 0, the dust density should drop faster than the gas i.e. density away from the midplane. This is equivalent to entropy increasing away from the midplane. A similar expression exists for the radial buoyancy frequency Nr, but Nr ≪ Nz in thin, smooth disks. A vertical buoyancy force exists even in vertically isothermal dusty disks, because coupling gas to dust particles increases the fluid's inertia, but pressure (i.e. restoring) forces are unchanged. The increased weight of the fluid resists vertical oscillations and hence there is an associated buoyancy force. However, if ts 6= 0 so the gas- dust coupling is imperfect, then gas is no longer 'weighed down' by the dust, and can slip past it. Thus finite drag diminishes the dust-induced buoyancy. This is similar to reducing gas buoyancy through cooling (Lin & Youdin 2015). 3.4. Physical disk conditions The above correspondence between isothermal dusty gas and adiabatic pure gas is derived under the ter- minal velocity approximation, which applies to short stopping times, tsΩK ≪ 1; and the locally isothermal approximation, which applies to short cooling times, tcoolΩK ≪ 1. In typical protoplanetary disk models such as the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula, ts decreases for smaller particles and/or towards smaller radii (Youdin 2011). However, tcool is generally only small in the outer disk (Lin & Youdin 2015; Malygin et al. 2017). Combin- ing these results, we estimate the correspondence will be applicable to particles less than mm in size at a few to 10s of AU in protoplanetary disks. However, note that the isothermal approximation may be relaxed to other fixed equations of state (see §7.2). 4. GENERAL STABILITY CRITERIA FOR DUSTY GAS In this section we discuss the stability properties of the dusty-gas mixture using a variational principle. This ap- proach does not require explicit solutions (i.e. a specific distribution of the density and dust-to-gas ratio) to the equilibrium equations. We consider axisymmetric sys- tems and neglect self-gravity here. 4.1. Steady states For a given distribution of the dust-fraction fd (or dust-to-gas ratio ǫ), the mass and momentum Eqs. 5 -- 7 admit solutions with ρ(r, z) and v = rΩ(r, z) φ where Ω = vφ/r, which satisfy rΩ2 = 0 = ∂Φ ∂r ∂Φ ∂z + + 1 ρ 1 ρ ∂P ∂r ∂P ∂z , , (21) (22) with P = P (fd, ρ) given by the equation of state (Eq. 13). An explicit solution is presented in §5.1, when we analyze the stability of protoplanetary disks. The mixture possess vertical shear. To see this, we eliminate Φ between Eq. 21 -- 22 to obtain r ∂Ω2 ∂z = 1 ρ(cid:18) ∂P ∂r ∂Seff ∂z − ∂P ∂z ∂Seff ∂r (cid:19) . (23) and recall Seff = ln(cid:2)c2 s (1 − fd)(cid:3). It is well appreciated that vertical stratification of the dust layer contributes to vertical shear (Chiang 2008). Eq. 23 shows that a ra- dial dust stratification (∂rfd) also contributes to vertical shear. Our equilibrium solutions satisfy the hydrostatic con- straints of Eq. 21 -- 22 but are not in general steady state solutions to the energy equation (15), because the source term C 6= 0 for realistic disks. Limiting cases with C ≡ 0 include 1) unstratified or 2D, razor-thin disk mod- els with finite dust-gas drag; 2) perfectly-coupled dust with ts = 0. The following analyses thus apply strictly to these limiting cases of C = 0 in equilibrium. Our anal- ysis is also a good approximation when ts is sufficiently small such that the evolution of the background disk (e.g. dust-settling) occur on much longer timescales than the instability growth timescales. 4.2. Integral relation We consider axisymmetric Eulerian perturbations to a variable X of the form Re [δX(r, z) exp (−iσt)] , where σ is the complex mode frequency. We write σ = is − ω, (24) (25) where s and ω are the growth rate and real frequen- cies, respectively. Then perturbations have time depen- dence est+iωt. Thus for ω > 0, perturbations rotate anti- clockwise in the complex plane. In Appendix A we linearize Eqs. 5, 7, and Eq. 15 to derive the following integral relation: r + δv∗ z δvr) B + ρδvz2D 2(cid:21) dV −Z (∇ · δv∗) δCdV (26) (27) σ2I 2 =Z (cid:20)ρδvr2A + ρ (δvzδv∗ 1 + P(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)∇ · (P δv)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) −Z P (∇ · δv∗)(cid:0)δv · ∇ ln c2 s(cid:1) dV, I 2 ≡Z ρ(cid:0)δvr2 + δvz2(cid:1) dV where ∗ denotes the complex conjugate, is the meridional kinetic energy, and coefficients A, B, D can be read off Eq. A11. We now consider various limits of Eq. 26. 4.3. Strictly isothermal gas perfectly coupled to dust When c2 s is a constant and ts = 0 (so that C = 0), the dusty-gas equations are exactly equivalent to that for adiabatic hydrodynamics with unit adiabatic index. Al- though the gas is strictly isothermal, the mixture behaves adiabatically because the dust fraction fd is advected with the gas. This is similar to entropy conservation fol- lowing an adiabatic gas without heating or cooling. In this case, the last two integrals in Eq. 26 vanish. Then the condition for axisymmtric stability, σ2 > 0, is met if the integrand coefficients satisfy A + D > 0 and 6 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin AD−B2 > 0 (Ogilvie 2016, Section 11.6), which becomes (28) κ2 + 1 ρg − ∂P ∂z (cid:18)−κ2 ∂fd ∂z 1 ρg ∇P · ∇fd > 0, ∂Ω2 ∂z ∂r (cid:19) > 0, ∂fd + r (29) where κ2 ≡ r−3∂r(cid:0)r4Ω2(cid:1) > 0 is the square of the epicylic frequency. Note that ∇P/ρg = c2 isothermal gas considered here. Eq. s∇ ln ρg for strictly 28 -- 29 can in fact be obtained by inserting CP ln (1 − fd) for the entropy into the standard expres- sion for the Solberg-Hoiland criteria (Tassoul 1978) for axisymmetric stability of adiabatic gas. This substitu- tion is consistent with our definition of the effective en- tropy Seff since we are considering constant cs. We expect Eq. 28 to be satisfied in typical protoplan- etary disks where the dust-to-gas ratio increases in the same direction as the local pressure gradient, which is equivalent to the gas density gradient for isothermal gas. On the other hand, Eq. 29 can be violated in disks if the dust is vertically well-mixed but radially-stratified, such that ∂zfd = 0 but ∂rfd 6= 0. In this case the left- hand-side of Eq. 29 becomes −(cid:18) 1 ρg ∂P ∂z(cid:19)2(cid:18) ∂fd ∂r (cid:19)2 < 0. (30) Such an isothermal dusty disk is unstable because there is no effective vertical buoyancy to stabilize vertical mo- tions (Nz = 0), which can tap into the free energy asso- ciated with vertical shear due to the radial gradient in the dust-fraction. This situation is identical to the pure gas, adiabatic simulations of Nelson et al. (2013) where the gas entropy is vertically uniform but has a radial gradient. The authors indeed find instability. We give a numerical example in the dusty context in §6.6. 4.4. Thermodynamics of dust-drag instabilities The physical interpretation of §2 is here derived in de- tail. Consider constant cs but ts 6= 0 (so δC 6= 0). Eq. 26 indicates that σ2 is generally complex, unless the sec- ond integral on the right-hand-side is real. Thus we may have growing oscillations, or overstability, due to dust- gas friction. This is seen by taking the imaginary part of Eq. 26 s = ImR (∇ · δv∗) δCdV 2ωI 2 , (31) assuming ω 6= 0. Since drag (δC) appears as a source term in our effective energy equation, the quantity Im [(∇ · δv∗) δC] represent correlations between compres- sion/expansion and heating/cooling. It is well-known that such correlations may lead to pul- sational instabilities in stars (Cox 1967). We thus in- terpret dust-drag overstabilities in a similar way, adapt- ing from the treatment of stellar pulsations by Cox (1967) and lecture notes by Samadi et al. (2015) and J. Christensen-Dalsgaard4. 4 http://astro.phys.au.dk/$\sim$jcd/oscilnotes/print-chap-full.pdf 4.4.1. Work done by dusty gas The physical interpretation of Eq. 31 is that work done by pressure forces in the dusty gas leads to growth (s > 0) or decay (s < 0) in oscillation amplitudes. To demonstrate this, we calculate the average work done assuming periodic oscillations, and show that if the aver- age work done is positive, then the oscillation amplitude would actually grow. Consider oscillations in the dusty gas with period Tp. The average rate of work done is W = 1 TpZ t+Tp t dt′ZM P Dυ Dt′ dm (32) (Cox 1967, see their Eq. 4.10 and related discussions), where υ = 1/ρ is the specific volume of the mixture, D/Dt is the Lagrangian derivative, and the spatial inte- gral is taken over the total mass M of the mixture and dm is a mass element. Here we consider Lagragian perturbations such that P → P + Re(cid:0)∆P e−iσt(cid:1) (33) is the pressure following a fluid element of the mixture (and similarly for ρ). The Lagrangian perturbation ∆ of a variable X is ∆X = δX + ξ · ∇X and ξ is the Lagrangian displacement, so ξx,z = iδvx,z/σ. Inserting the above pressure and density fields into Eq. 32, and noting that only products of perturbations contribute to W after time-averaging, we find for periodic oscillations (time dependence eiωt and real ω) that: W = − ω 2Z Im(cid:18)∆P ∆ρ∗ ρ (cid:19) dV, (34) Eq. 34 show that a phase difference between gas pressure and the total density leads to work done (W 6= 0). tor in Eq. 31 is Now, Eq. A1 -- A2 imply the integrand of the numera- Im (δC∇ · δv∗) = −σ2 Im(cid:18)∆P ∆ρ∗ ρ (cid:19) , (35) for constant cs. Then combining Eq. 34, 35 and 31 gives is done by where we have set σ = −ω in Eq. 35. Eq. 36 states that if the average work done is positive during an oscillation, W > 0, then its amplitude would actually grow (s > 0). if Positive work −ω Im (∆P ∆ρ∗) > 0. Without loss of generality, take ω > 0 and consider a mass element with ∆ρ = 1. Then positive work requires Im (∆P ) < 0. This cor- responds to Lagrangian pressure perturbations lagging behind that in density, see Fig. 3 for the case of dusty gas. a fluid parcel 4.4.2. Physical property of dust-gas drag overstabilities The above discussion applies to any single fluid with a pressure and density. In the case of interest -- dusty gas -- the work done is attributed to finite dust-gas drag. The relative drift between gas and dust, which only exists if ts∇P 6= 0 (Eq. 4), causes a phase difference between s = W I 2 , (36) Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 7 Im overstability in dusty−gas ∆ρdusteiωt ωt ∆ρgaseiωt Re work ∝ω[arg(∆ρdust)−arg(∆ρgas)]>0 Figure 3. Phase relation for overstable modes in isothermal dusty gas. Such modes require (Lagrangian) oscillations in the gas pres- sure, which is directly proportional to the gas density, to lag be- hind that in dust density. The eigenvectors rotate anti-clockwise for ω > 0. the two components, and hence between pressure and total density. A parcel of the strictly isothermal dusty-gas mixture does positive work if − sgn (ω) Im (∆ρg∆ρ∗ d) > 0, meaning that gas follows dust (Fig. 3). Overstabilities are thus not possible if the gas does not respond to dust (i.e. no back-reaction).The pressure-density lag shown in Fig. 3 is achieved if, just after the total density of a parcel maximizes, its gas content is increasing, which requires a sufficiently large particle flux out of the parcel. See A to B in Fig. 2. This thermodynamic interpretation does not explain why drag forces causes gas pressure to lag behind the dust density, but shows that this must be the case for any growing oscillations associated the dust-gas drag. To rigorously understand how dust-drag causes this lag requires an explicit solution to the linearized equations with detailed treatment of the function C. However, given the complexity of C (see Appendix C), we might generally expect dusty disks to support a range of stable and overstable modes, with the latter being associated In §5.3.2 we check that the with pressure-density lag. streaming instability fits into this thermodynamic inter- pretation in the strong drag limit. 4.5. Locally isothermal gas perfectly coupled to dust If cs(r, z) is non-uniform but ts = 0, Eq. 26 gives s = s(cid:1) dV ImR P (∇ · δv∗)(cid:0)δv · ∇ ln c2 2ωI 2 , (37) again assuming ω 6= 0. This instability represents VSI caused by vertical shear arising from a radial tempera- ture gradient (Nelson et al. 2013; Barker & Latter 2015; Lin & Youdin 2015). We present numerical solutions of the VSI with perfectly-coupled dust in §6. 5. APPLICATION TO PROTOPLANETARY DISKS state. We first specify the disk structures to be analyzed. We show that sharp radial edges in the dust-to-gas ratio can render the disk unstable. We then revisit two well- known instabilities in dusty gas using the hydrodynamic framework developed thus far, namely secular gravita- tional (SGI) instabilities and the streaming instability (SI). 5.1. Disk structure with a prescribed dust distribution We assume a Gaussian profile in the dust-to-gas ratio, ǫ(r, z) = ǫ0(r) exp(cid:20)− z2 2H 2 ǫ (r)(cid:21). (38) Inserting Eq. 38 into vertical hydrostatic equilibrium, Eq. 22 and integrating with the approximate gravita- tional potential (Eq. 10) we obtain the gas density as ρg(r, z) = ρg0(r) exp(cid:26)− z2 g − ǫ0 2H 2 H 2 ǫ H 2 g (cid:20)1 − exp(cid:18)− z2 2H 2 ǫ(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:27), (39) where Hg = , ΩK ≡r GM∗ r3 , cs ΩK (40) is the gas scale-height in the dust-free limit and ΩK is the Keplerian frequency, respectively. In gas-dominated disks with ǫ0 < 1 the gas distribution ρg(r, z) is close to Gaussian, as in the dust-free case, and the dust density is approximately with ρd ≃ ǫ0ρg0(r) exp(cid:18)− z2 2H 2 d(cid:19), 1 H 2 d = 1 H 2 ǫ + 1 H 2 g , and Hd is the dust-scale height. Finally, we define Z ≡ ǫ0 Hd Hg ≃ Σd Σg (41) (42) (43) as a measure of the local metalicity, where Σd and Σg are the dust and gas surface densities, respectively. The second equality holds for ǫ0 ≪ 1. 5.1.1. Orbital frequency From Eq. 21 the disk orbital frequency is Ω(r, z) = ΩK(r)"1 − 3 2 z2 r2 + h2 g ∂ (1 + ǫ) ∂ ln r where sρg(cid:1)#1/2 ln(cid:0)c2 , (44) hg ≡ Hg r (45) We now examine instabilities in dusty protoplanetary disks based on explicit descriptions of the equilibrium is the characteristic disk aspect-ratio, with hg ≪ 1 for protoplanetary disks. 8 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin 5.1.2. Vertical shear Writing Eq. 23 in terms of the gas density and dust- to-gas ratio with a power-law temperature profile (Eq. 14) gives the disk's explicit vertical shear profile: To violate Eq. 48 and obtain instability, notice the left hand side is a quadratic in ∂rǫ. Thus instability is possi- ble for sufficiently large (in magnitude) radial gradients in the dust-to-gas ratio, r ∂Ω2 ∂z = c2 s(r) (1 + ǫ)2(cid:26) ∂ǫ ∂r ∂ ln ρg ∂z − q r − (1 + ǫ) ∂ǫ ∂z ∂ ln P ∂r ∂ ln ρg ∂z (cid:27) . (46) The first two terms correspond to vertical shear caused by spatial variations in the dust-to-gas ratio. The third term proportional to q corresponds to vertical shear due to the radial temperature gradient, which survives in the dust-free limit. We can compare these sources by evaluating them us- ing the equilibrium solutions in §5.1. We assume the disk is radially smooth so that ∂r ∼ 1/r. This gives r∂zΩ dust/gas gradient r∂zΩ temp. gradient ∼ ǫ max(cid:0)δ2, 1(cid:1) q (1 + ǫ) δ2 , (47) where δ ≡ Hǫ/Hg. Since q = O(1) in PPDs, Eq. 47 indicates that vertical shear due to variations in the dust- to-gas ratio dominates over that due to the radial tem- perature gradient for thin dust layers such that δ2 ≪ ǫ. 5.1.3. Dusty vertical buoyancy For the above equilibrium the vertical buoyancy fre- quency is given explicitly as N 2 z = ǫ (1 + ǫ)2(cid:18) z Hǫ(cid:19)2 Ω2 K, where we have used cs = cs(r). Then Nz . O (√ǫ0ΩK) . However, for well-mixed dust layers such that Hǫ ≫ Hg, max (Nz) may occur outside a finite vertical domain. 5.2. Instability of dusty edges Here we apply the dusty analog of the Solberg-Hoiland criteria derived in §4.3 assuming strictly isothermal gas. As discussed there, the first criterion is generally satis- fied. Thus we only consider the second condition, Eq. 29. We assume the disk is approximately Keplerian so that κ ≃ ΩK, and that the vertical gas distribution is Gaus- sian. In terms of the dust-to-gas ratio ǫ, Eq. 29 becomes ǫh2 g (1 + ǫ)2 1 − ∂ ln ǫ ∂ ln r(cid:18)− ∂ ln P ∂ ln r + H 2 ǫ H 2 g ∂ ln ǫ ∂ ln r(cid:19) > 0, (48) for stability. The first term in brackets is usually sta- bilizing in PPDs for reasons given in §4.3. The second term in brackets is always destabilizing, but is small in smooth, thin disks with radial gradients O(1/r), hg ≪ 1, provided that Hǫ/Hg is not large (e.g. some dust settling has occurred). This means that typical dusty PPDs are stable to axisymmetric perturbations, even for arbitrar- ily thin dust layers. ∂ ln ǫ ∂ ln r > χ+ or ∂ ln ǫ ∂ ln r < χ−, (49) for instability, where χ± = 1 2 H 2 g H 2 ǫ  ∂ ln P ∂ ln r ±s(cid:18) ∂ ln P ∂ ln r(cid:19)2 + 4 H 2 ǫ H 2 g (1 + ǫ)2 ǫh2 g  . (50) In typical accretion disks where ∂rP < 0, instability is easier for increasing dust-to-gas ratios (∂rǫ > 0). We can neglect pressure gradients in Eq. r∂r ln P ∼ O(1) and Hǫ/Hg ≫ √ǫhg/2 (1 + ǫ). For example, if ǫ ≃ 0.01 and hg ≃ 0.05, then we require Hǫ/Hg ≫ 2 × 10−3. This can be met if the dust is not well settled (e.g. due to a small amount of turbulence). Then instability requires 50 if 1 Hǫ (1 + ǫ) √ǫ . (51) (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ∂ ln ǫ ∂r (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) & That is, if the radial lengthscale of the dust-to-gas ratio is much less its vertical lengthscale, Lǫ ≪ O(Hǫ), then the system is unstable. Taking ǫ ∼ 0.01, we find that for thin dust layers with Hǫ ≃ Hd ≪ Hg, instability requires Lǫ ≪ O(0.1Hg), i.e. the dust-to-gas ratio must vary on an extremely short radial lengthscale. This might be achieved, for example, at sharp edges associated with gaps opened by giant planets. Technically, the above discussion is only applicable when cs is constant and ts = 0 (see §4.3). However, since dusty edges translate to sharp entropy gradients ( §3.3), we may generally expect sharp features in the dust distribution of protoplanetary disks to be unstable. 5.3. Radially local problem We now specialize further and compute explicit so- lutions to the linear problem. We consider radially- localized axisymmetric disturbances of the form δX(r, z) = δX1(r, z) exp (ikxr), (52) where kx is a real wavenumber such that kxr ≫ 1, and the amplitude δX1(r, z) is a slowly-varying function of r. Then ∂r → ikx when acting on the above primitive perturbations, and we may neglect curvature terms. We take kx > 0 without loss of generality. Hereafter, we drop the subscript 1 on the amplitudes. Introducing W ≡ δρ ρ , Q ≡ δP ρ , (53) the linearized equations for vertically isothermal dusty gas with the pressure equation in place of the dust- fraction (Eq. 5, 7, 11, 15) are then: Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 9 iσW = ikxδvr + δv′ z + δvr∂r ln ρ + δvz∂z ln ρ, κ2 2Ω −iσδvr = 2Ωδvφ − W Fr − ikxQ − ikxδψ, iσδvφ = δvr + δvz, −iσδvz = −W Fz −(cid:2)Q′ + Q (ln ρ)′(cid:3) − δψ′, (ikxδvr + δv′ iσQ = ∂vφ ∂z (δvr∂rP + δvz∂zP ) (54) (55) (56) (57) P ρ P ρ − 1 ρ z) + δC ρ s − xδψ, δvr∂r ln c2 , (58) δψ′′ = 4πGρW + k2 (59) where ′ ≡ ∂z and recall F ≡ −∇P/ρ. We have tem- porarily restored self-gravity to discuss SGI in the next section. The linearized dust-diffusion function δC is given in Appendix C. Eq. 54 -- 59 is a set of ordinary differential equations in z. All coefficients and amplitudes are evaluated at a fiducial radius r = r0, but their full z-dependence is retained. We next discuss solutions to these equations. We first show that the above equations yield the SGI and SI in the strong drag regime in §5.3.1 and §5.3.2, respectively. We then consider 3D, stratified disks in §6 to study how the addition of dust affects the vertical shear instability. 5.3.1. Secular gravitational instability sk2 Consider a razor-thin, self-gravitating disk so that ρ = Σδ(z), where δ is the Dirac delta function and Σ is the total surface density. Here ǫ = Σd/Σg and fd = Σd/Σ, where Σd,g are the dust and gas surface densities. The background disk is uniform and we neglect the vertical dimension in Eq. 54 -- 58. The linearized dust-gas drag term is then −δC/ρ = tsfdc2 xQ. The thin-disk solution to Eq. 59 is δψ(z = 0) = −2πGΣW/ kx. These simplifications yield the dispersion relation (cid:0)iσ − tsfdc2 x (1 − fd) . Searching for slowly and purely growing modes, σ = is with s ≪ κ, we find tsfdc2 x(cid:1)(cid:0)2πGΣkx − κ2 + σ2(cid:1) = iσc2 x(cid:0)2πΣGkx − κ2(cid:1) κ2 − 2πΣGkx + c2 x (1 − fd) sk2 sk2 sk2 . (60) sk2 s = This is secular gravitational instability mediated by strong dust-gas drag with negligible turbulent dust diffu- sion (Takahashi & Inutsuka 2014, their Eq. 13 becomes our Eq. 60 in this limit after a change of variables). A similar effect occurs in viscous self-gravitating gas disks (Gammie 1996; Lin & Kratter 2016). In fact, if we iden- tify ν ≡ tsfdc2 s as a kinematic viscosity, then Eq. 60 is identical to Gammie's Eq. 18. This exercise shows that the one-fluid framework, fur- ther simplified by the terminal velocity approximation, is sufficient to capture SGI in the strong drag limit. 5.3.2. Streaming instability We now consider 3D disks without self-gravity. We ne- glect the vertical component of the stellar gravity, appro- priate for studying regions near the disk midplane. This dispersion relation of the form P5 allows us to Fourier analyze in z to obtain an algebraic j=0 cj(kx, kz)σj = 0, where kz is a real vertical wavenumber. The coefficients cj can be read off Eq. D8 in Appendix D. There we also show that this dispersion relation reduces to that for the streaming instability (SI) in the limit of incom- pressible gas and small ts (Youdin & Goodman 2005; Jacquet et al. 2011). In Table 1 we solve the full dispersion relation (Eq. D8) numerically for selected cases where analytic SI growth rates have been verified with particle-gas numerical sim- ulations (namely Youdin & Johansen 2007; Bai & Stone 2010b). Following previous works on SI, we use normal- ized wavenumbers Kx,z = ηrkx,z where η ≡ − 1 2ρgrΩ2 K ∂P ∂r = 1 2 (1 − fd) Fr rΩ2 K , (61) measures the pressure offset of Keplerian rotation. We fix η = 0.05cs/rΩK. In this section section we also quote the particle stopping time τs = ts/(1 − fd). The eigenfrequencies obtained from the one-fluid dis- persion relation are compared that from a full, two- fluid analysis (similar to Youdin & Goodman 2005; Kowalik et al. 2013). As expected eigenfrequencies agree better with decreasing τs since in that limit the mixture behaves more like a single fluid. Most importantly, we find the work done W > 0 in all cases, and hence find growing oscillations. In Table 1 we also calculate the phase difference be- tween the Lagrangian pressure perturbation and density perturbations as ϕ ≡ sgn [Re (σ)] arg (∆P ∆ρ∗) . (Note that it is important to include the global radial pressure gradient in ∆P = δP +iδvx∂rP/σ.) Then ϕ > 0 indicates gas pressure lagging behind total density, which is true for all the cases. Thus SI is indeed associated with such a phase lag. In Fig. 4 we calculate the most unstable SI mode as a function of τs at fixed Kz = 30 and ǫ = 3. Growth rates are maximized over Kx. We compare results between the full, two-fluid linear analysis and the one-fluid frame- work. We also include an analytic model, developed in Appendix D.2, based on the one-fluid dispersion relation with additional approximations (orange diamonds). Both results based on the one-fluid framework com- pares well with the full, two-fluid analysis, only break- ing down at a relatively large τsΩK & 0.1. For larger τs the two-fluid phase lag drops, along with the growth rate. This suggest that a non-vanishing phase lag is in- deed necessary for instability. However, the magnitude of the phase lag does not correlate with growth rates. In fact, ϕ remains finite as σ, τs → 0 (but non-zero). This diverges (see arises because the optimum Kx ∝ τ Appendix D.2). −1/2 s In a future work we will perform a more detailed pa- rameter survey to compare the simplified one-fluid and full two-fluid frameworks in calculating SI (cf. com- parisons using other problems, Laibe & Price 2014; Price & Laibe 2015). 6. VERTICAL SHEAR INSTABILITY WITH DUST 10 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin Selected modes of the streaming instability. Table 1 Mode (τsΩK, Kx,z, ρg/ρd) Complex frequency, σ/ΩK linA† (0.1, 30, 3) linB† (0.1, 6, 0.2) linC‡ (10−2, 1500, 2) linD‡ (10−3, 2000, 2) † Youdin & Johansen (2007) ‡ Bai & Stone (2010b) two-fluid one-fluid 0.3480 + 0.4190i 0.3640 + 0.4249i −0.4999 + 0.0155i −0.4981 + 0.0054i 0.1338 + 0.6650i 0.1049 + 0.5981i 0.3225 + 0.3154i 0.3219 + 0.3154i Work done, W/ ∆P ∆ρ∗/ρ Pressure-density lag, ϕ one-fluid two-fluid 30◦ 0.078 1.2◦ 0.025 11◦ 0.0076 22◦ 0.061 two-fluid 27◦ 5.8◦ 8.3◦ 22◦ one-fluid 0.090 0.0054 0.013 0.061 Streaming instability, ρd=3ρg, Kz=30 100 10-1 10-2 100 10-1 K Ω / ) σ ( m I t h w o r g K Ω / ) σ ( e R . q e r f x K . t p o 10-2 104 103 102 101 100 8 6 4 2 0 40 30 20 2 0 1 × e n o d k r o W g a l e s a h p ρ - P 10 0 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 Stopping time, τsΩK Figure 4. Comparison of the linear streaming instability between a full two-fluid analysis (solid line), the one-fluid framework simpli- fied by the terminal velocity approximation (green asterisks) and an analytic solution to the one-fluid dispersion relation in the dust- rich limit (orange diamonds, see also Appendix D.2). The vertical wavenumber is fixed and growth rates are maximized over Kx. Full two-fluid Simplified one-fluid Model for τsΩK<<1 100 We now present numerical solutions for vertically strat- ified, non-self-gravitating disks, assuming perfectly cou- pled dust. We formally take ts = 0 so the equilib- In real- rium defined in §4.1 are exact steady states. ity, dust settles to the midplane on a timescale tsettle ∼ 1/tsΩ2 K (Takeuchi & Lin 2002). However, we expect the perfectly-coupled limit to be valid provided timescales of interest tgrow ≪ tsettle. For the VSI this trans- lates to tsΩK ≪ hg. For thin PPDs, this is satisfied for tsΩK ≪ O(10−2). We first consider constant midplane dust-to-gas ratios ǫ0 and characteristic thickness Hǫ. Then the dust-to- gas ratio ǫ = ǫ(z). In this limit any growing modes must be associated with the imposed temperature gra- dient (see §4). We are then studying the effect of dust- loading on the VSI previously studied in pure gas disks (Lin & Youdin 2015, LY15 in this section). In §6.5 we al- low ∂rǫ 6= 0, and in §6.6 we consider VSI driven entirely by radial gradients in the dust-to-gas ratio (as discussed in §4.3). The parameters for the linear problem includes ǫ0, the dust layer thickness Hd, and the perturbation ra- dial wavenumber kx. We choose a midplane gas density profile ρg0 ∝ r−3/2. The fiducial power-law index for the temperature profile is q = −1; and we set the gas disk aspect-ratio hg = 0.05. These values were also used by LY15. We that δvz(±zmax) = 0. We solve the linearized equations as a generalized eigenvalue problem using a pseudo- spectral code adapted from LY15. Amplitudes are expanded in Chebyshev polynomials up to order 512. solid vertical boundaries impose so 6.1. Qualitative expectations LY15 found the appropriate way to compare vertical shear (destabilizing) and vertical buoyancy (stabilizing) is r∂zΩ/ΩK against N 2 K. From §5.1.2 and §5.1.3 we find r∂z Ω ∼ qhgΩK for a thin, gas dominated disk; while N 2 K. Thus we expect dust-induced buoyancy forces to stabilize the disk against the VSI where ǫ & hg. z ∼ ǫΩ2 z /Ω2 6.2. Effect of dust-loading We first vary the midplane dust-to-gas ratio ǫ0 ∈ [10−3, 1], fixing the dust thickness to Hd = 0.99Hg. Then ǫ is roughly constant with height. We set the vertical do- main to zmax = 5Hg. Fig. 5 compares the basic state vertical shear rate, which is destabilizing, and the vertical buoyancy fre- quency, which is stabilizing. For the nearly dust-free disk ǫ0 = 10−3 the vertical shear dominates buoyancy for all z > 0. However, a heavy dust-load with ǫ0 = 1 renders the buoyancy to dominate over vertical shear in Hd=0.99Hg ρd0/ρg0=10−3 ρd0/ρg0=1 5 4 3 2 1 0 Isothermal dusty gas dynamics ρd0/ρg0=10−3 ρd0/ρg0=1 g H / z 4 2 0 -2 -4 4 2 0 -2 -4 ) d i l o s ( Κ Ω g h / z Ω ∂ r ) d e t t o d ( Κ2 Ω g h / 2z N 11 1.00 0.67 0.33 0.00 -0.33 -0.67 -1.00 -4 -2 0 z/Hg 2 4 Figure 5. Vertical shear rate (solid) compared to vertical buoy- ancy (dotted) in a locally isothermal, dusty disk with midplane dust-to-gas ratio of ǫ0 = 10−3 (black) and ǫ0 = 1 (blue). The dust layer thickness is fixed to Hd = 0.99Hg so the dust-to-gas ratio ǫ is approximately constant with height. Vertical buoyancy here is due to dust-loading. ) Κ Ω g h ( / s 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 kxHg=30, Hd=0.99Hg ρd0/ρg0=10−3 ρd0/ρg0=10−2 ρd0/ρg0=10−1 ρd0/ρg0=1 2 4 ω/(hg 6 ΩΚ) 8 10 Figure 6. Unstable modes in a locally isothermal, perfectly coupled dusty disk with fiducial parameters (p, q, hg, Hd/Hg) = (−1.5, −1, 0.05, 0.99). The real frequency ω and growth rates s are shown for a range of midplane dust-to-gas ratios ǫ0 = ρg0/ρd0. the disk atmosphere z & 2.5Hg. We thus expect insta- bility all heights for ǫ0 = 10−3, but to be restricted to the midplane for ǫ0 = 1. Fig. 6 show unstable modes for different values of ǫ0 with fixed perturbation wavenumber kxHg = 30. The eigenvalue distributions for ǫ0 ≤ 10−2 are similar to the dust-free fiducial case considered by LY15. This is ex- pected since ǫ0 < hg (§6.1). Eigenvalues consists of the roughly horizontal 'body modes', and the nearly-vertical 'surface modes' (which are associated with the imposed vertical boundaries, Barker & Latter 2015). We find that increasing the dust-to-gas ratio reduce VSI growth rates. Notably, surface modes, which are typically fastest growing in the dust-free case, are sup- pressed in dusty disks for ǫ0 ≥ 0.1 (i.e. ǫ0 > hg). The body modes' growth rates remain O(hgΩK) but their os- cillation frequency increases with dust-loading, i.e. it increases with the vertical buoyancy. The total number of modes do not change significantly. This is in contrast with the effect of increasing cooling times in an adiabatic gas disk, for which LY15 find fewer unstable modes. The lowest frequency 'fundamental' body mode is en- ergetically dominant because the entire disk column is perturbed (cf. surface modes which only disturb the disk boundaries, Umurhan et al. 2016a). In Fig. 7 we com- pare the fundamental mode between the nearly dust-free case ǫ0 = 10−3 an a dusty disk with ǫ0 = 1. Dust-loading -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 x/Hg -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 x/Hg Figure 7. Fundamental dusty VSI mode in real space for mid- plane dust-to-gas ratio ǫ0 = 10−3 (left) and ǫ0 = 1 (right). The color scale shows the perturbation to the dust-to-gas ratio, δǫ; and the arrows show √ρ (δvx, δvz ). ) Κ Ω g h ( / x a m s 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 10-3 Hd=0.99Hg kxHg=1 kxHg=10 kxHg=50 kxHg=100 10-2 Σd/Σg 10-1 100 Figure 8. Maximum growth rate of the dusty VSI as a function of the midplane dust-to-gas ratio ǫ0 for perturbations with different radial wavenumbers k. The dust layer thickness is fixed to Hd ≃ Hg. preferentially stabilizes the disk atmosphere against the VSI, restricting meridional motions to z . 2Hg. This is consistent with Fig. 5 comparing the basic state vertical shear and buoyancy. In Fig. 8 we plot the growth rates as a function of ǫ0 for different perturbation wavenumbers kx. Dust-loading stabilizes the VSI more effectively for shorter wavelength perturbations. This is because for high wavenumbers the dominant modes are surface modes, which are effectively stabilized by dust-loading as buoyancy forces are largest near the vertical boundaries. The figure suggest that VSI becomes much less efficient for ǫ0 & 0.1 and kxHg & 50. 6.3. Effect of dust layer thickness We now vary Hd but fix the metalicity Z ≡ ǫ0Hd/Hg = 0.03 to obtain ǫ0. Since we will consider thin dust layers, here we use a smaller domain with zmax = 2Hg so that ǫ does not become too small. We analyze two disks with Hd = 0.1Hg and Hd = 0.99Hg. Fig. 9 compares the vertical shear rate and buoyancy frequency. For z & 0.4Hg the two disks have the same profile with vertical shear dominating over buoyancy. We thus expect perturbations away from the disk midplane in both cases. For z . 0.4Hg, a thin dust layer with Hd = 0.1Hg boosts the vertical shear rate, but the associated buoyancy is larger still, implying the mid- plane should be stable. Fig. 10 compares the fastest growing VSI body modes 12 ) d i l o s ( Κ Ω g h / z Ω ∂ r ) d e t t o d ( Κ2 Ω g h / 2z N 5 4 3 2 1 0 -2 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin Σd=0.03Σg Hd=0.1Hg Hd=0.99Hg -1 0 z/Hg 1 2 ) Κ Ω g h ( / x a m s 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 10-1 Σd=0.03Σg kxHg=1 kxHg=10 kxHg=50 kxHg=100 Hd/Hg 100 Figure 9. Vertical shear rate (solid) compared to vertical buoy- ancy (dotted) in a locally isothermal, dusty disk with metalicity Z = 0.03 and dust thickness Hd = 0.1Hg (black) and Hd = 0.99Hg (blue). Figure 11. Maximum VSI growth rate for different perturbation wavenumbers k as a function of the dust layer thickness Hd at fixed metalicity Z = 0.03. frequency 2 1 0 -1 g H / z Hd=0.99Hg Hd=0.1Hg 2 1 0 -1 -2 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 -2 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 x/Hg x/Hg 1.00 0.67 0.33 0.00 -0.33 -0.67 -1.00 Figure 10. Fastest-growing dusty VSI mode in real space for midplane dust layer thickness Hd = 0.99Hg (left) and Hd = 0.1Hg (right). The dust content is fixed to Σd = 0.03Σg. The color scale shows the perturbation to the dust-to-gas ratio, δǫ; and the arrows show √ρ (δvx, δvz ). with kxHg = 30 for the two cases above.(The thinner domain adopted here eliminates surface modes, LY15). We find very similar mode frequencies σ =(cid:26)(0.3053i − 0.8142) hgΩK Hd = 0.99Hg, (0.3178i − 1.2237) hgΩK Hd = 0.1Hg, since the vertical shear profile is similar throughout most of the disk. However, meridional motions are suppressed near the midplane of the Hd = 0.1Hg disk, as expected from the larger buoyancy frequency relative to vertical shear there. This leads to a structure analogous to PPD dead zones: a quiescent midplane between active surface layers (Gammie 1996). Fig. 11 shows the maximum VSI growth rates as a function of Hd. As before, we find growth rates are most affected by the vertical structure of the dust layer when the perturbation wavenumer is large. Notice VSI growth rates converge as Hd → 0. Thus a thin dust layer, however large its associated vertical shear, does not affect VSI growth rates. The non-monotonic behav- ior for Hd & 0.5Hg arises because the vertical buoyancy N 2 z (Hd; z, Z) ≃ZHgz2 exp(cid:18)− Hd(cid:18) 1 d − H 2 × 1 z2 2H 2 K g(cid:19)Ω2 g(cid:19) exp(cid:18)− 1 H 2 z2 2H 2 d(cid:19) is a non-monotonic function of Hd at fixed z. At z = Hg and z = 2Hg the buoyancy frequency is maximized for Hd ≃ 0.5Hg and Hd ≃ 0.8Hg, respectively. This is consistent with the abscissa of minima in growth rates in Fig. 11. 6.4. Axisymmetric stability of ultra-thin dust layers The discussion in §4.3 imply strictly isothermal disks with a radially uniform dust-to-gas ratio are stable against axisymmetric perturbations, no matter how thin the dust layer is. We now demonstrate this numerically. To connect with similar studies, here we also use the z / (r∂zΩ)2 to label calcula- Richardson number Ri ≡ N 2 tions (Youdin & Shu 2002). Numerical simulations show non-axisymmetric instabilities develops when Ri . 0.1, brought about by very thin dust layers (Chiang 2008; Lee et al. 2010). We show that axisymmetric instabilities never develop in radially uniform disks, however small Ri. We shall consider ultra thin dust layers with Hd ≤ 0.01Hg and thus restrict the vertical domain to zmax = 0.02Hg. We fix the metalicity Z = 0.01 so the mid- pane dust-to-gas ratio ǫ0 is O(1). We consider radial wavenumbers with kxHd = 1. Fig. 12 shows the maximum growth rate as a function of the radial temperature gradient, q. For all cases the vertical shear is dominated by that due to the dust layer (see §5.1.2). However, we see that s ∝ q, i.e growth rates vanish in the strictly isothermal limit. In partic- ular, this holds for Ri < 0.1, the critical value for non- axisymmetric instabilities. Axisymmetric instability here is associated with the thermal contribution to vertical shear: as q → 0, ∂zΩ becomes entirely due to ∂zǫ and there is no instability (s → 0). This result is independent of Ri, so the Richard- son number is does not characterize the axisymmetric stability of dust layers. 6.5. Effect of a radially-varying dust-to-gas ratio We now consider a radially-varying dust-to-gas ratio. Specifically we let ǫ0 ∝ r−1 and Hǫ ∝ Hg (cf. constant Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 13 10-3 10-4 10-5 ) Κ Ω g h ( / x a m s 10-6 10-2 Σd=0.01Σg, kxHd=1 Hd=0.003Hg, Ri0=0.025 Hd=0.007Hg, Ri0=0.14 Hd=0.01Hg, Ri0=0.28 10-1 q 100 ) Κ Ω g h ( / s 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 ρd/ρg=ε(z) ρd/ρg=ε(z) ρd/ρg=ε(r,z) ρd/ρg=ε(r,z) kxHg=10 kxHg=30 kxHg=100 2 4 ω/(hg 6 ΩΚ) 8 10 Figure 12. Maximum VSI growth rate for ultra-thin dust layers Hd ≤ 0.01Hg (with radially uniform dust-to-gas ratio). Vertical shear is dominated by that due to vertical dust stratification, but axisymmetric instability is still associated with the radial temper- ature gradient q. Here, Ri0 is the minimum Richardson number in the domain in the limit q → 0. The disk is stable to axisymmetric perturbations in the strictly isothermal limit, regardless of the dust layer thickness. ) d i l o s ( Κ Ω g h / z Ω ∂ r ) d e t t o d ( Κ2 Ω g h / 2z N ρd/ρg=ε(z) ρd/ρg=ε(r,z) 3 2 1 0 -4 -2 0 z/Hg 2 4 Figure 13. Vertical shear rate (solid) compared to vertical buoy- ancy (dotted) in a locally isothermal, dusty disk with metalicity Z = 0.01 and dust thickness Hd = 0.8Hg. Black curves assume a dust-to-gas ratio that only depends on height; whereas the blue curve also allows a radial dependence in ǫ. See text for details. values in the previous calculations). Then dr − Here we fix Z = 0.01, Hd = 0.8Hg. H 2 ǫ d ln Hg ∂ǫ ∂r =(cid:18) z2 1 r(cid:19) ǫ. Fig. 13 shows that a radially-varying dust-to-gas ratio increases the magnitude of the vertical shear rate away from the midplane (see also Eq. 46). Thus we typically find higher VSI growth rates, as shown in Fig. 14. Sur- faces modes, appearing at high kx, are more effectively enhanced by the additional vertical shear induced by ∂rǫ. Low frequency body modes with small kx are more af- fected by radial variations in the dust-to-gas ratio than high-kx, high-frequency body modes. However, all growth rates remain O(hgΩK). Impor- tantly, the increase in the growth rate of the fundamental mode is small. We do not expect the radial dependence in ǫ to significantly affect the VSI in a dusty disk. 6.6. Pure instability with vertically well-mixed dust In §4.3 we found that for strictly isothermal disks, a vertically-uniform dust-to-gas ratio can be unstable if To demonstrate this numerically we set dǫ/dr 6= 0. q = 0 and Hd such that Hǫ = 103Hg. We let ρd/ρg ∝ r−d Figure 14. Unstable VSI modes in the disk models of Fig. 13. Diamonds (asterisks) are mode frequencies for a disk with radially uniform (varying) dust-to-gas ratio. The radial wavenumbers are kxHg = 10 (green),kxHg = 30 (black) and kxHg = 100 (orange). ) Κ Ω g h ( / s 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -1.0 -0.5 ρd/ρg∝r−10, kxHg=50 ρd/ρg∝r−3, kxHg=300 ρd/ρg∝r−1, kxHg=600 ρd/ρg∝r−1, kxHg=1800 1.0 0.5 0.0 ω/(hg ΩΚ) Figure 15. Purely growing modes in a strictly isothermal disk (q = 0) with vertically uniform dust-to-gas ratio. The instability is due to vertical shear ∂zΩ 6= 0 arising from radial variations in the dust-to-gas ratio, dǫ/dr 6= 0. with different power indices d. The metalicity is fixed to Z = 0.03. In these cases vertical shear ∂zΩ is attributed to the radially-varying dust-to-gas ratio (see Eq. 46). We show unstable modes in Fig. 15. As expected from the discussion in §4.3, the disk admits purely growing modes with ω = 0. This is distinct from the growing oscillations associated with classic VSI discussed above. We find in smooth disks large kx is needed for appre- ciable growth rates, e.g. kxHg = 1800 with ρd/ρg ∝ r−1. Local shearing box simulations may be required to study the non-linear evolution of such short wavelengths (e.g. Bai & Stone 2010b; Yang & Johansen 2016). Alterna- tively, as shown in Fig. 15, a rapidly varying dust-to-gas ratio permits dynamical instability at longer radial wave- lengths, which might be resolvable in global disk simula- tions. 7. DISCUSSION 7.1. Applications and limitations for envision The main application we the dusty/adiabatic gas analogy is to develop physical interpretations of dust-gas drag instabilities; and to find dusty analogs of pure gas instabilities in protoplanetary disks, which is discussed in §7.3. One can also exploit the similarity to adapt existing hydrodynamic codes to simulate dusty protoplanetary disks (see §7.4). It is important to keep in mind the assumptions used to develop our thermodynamic model of dusty gas. The 14 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin terminal velocity approximation, vd − vg = ts∇P/ρg, was employed from the outset. This is applicable to small particles with short stopping times and strongly coupled to the gas. Generally we require ts to be the shortest timescale in the physical problem. For example, to study dust settling, we require ts ≪ tsettle ∼ 1/tsΩ2 K, or tsΩK ≪ 1. However, the validity of the terminal velocity approxi- mation may not only depend on ts. The value of the dust gas-ratio and the problem itself may also be important. For example, Table 1 shows the dust-rich 'linA' mode and dust-poor 'linB' mode of the streaming instability have the same ts, but the former is accurately captured by the simplified equations, while the latter is not. This suggests that for the streaming instability the simplified equations is better suited for ρd/ρg > 1. The simplified equations also contain spurious modes in certain limits (see §D.3). Note that our thermodynamic interpretation of dust- gas drift does not actually depend on the terminal ve- locity approximation. Once the gas equation of state is fixed and the true energy equation deleted, the dust continuity equation can be converted to a new effective energy equation. As an example, for strictly isothermal dusty gas we obtain DP Dt = −P∇ · v + c2 s∇ · [fd (1 − fd) ρ (vd − vg)] . (62) This equation does not use the terminal velocity approxi- mation (which gives Eq. 15). Evaluating the right-hand- side generally requires solving an evolutionary equation for vd − vg (Laibe & Price 2014). Nevertheless, Eq. 62 shows that dust-gas relative drift can be interpreted as a heat flux within the dust-gas mixture. Thus, even with- out the terminal velocity approximation we can regard the dusty-gas as a single ideal fluid subject to cooling. 7.2. Generalization to locally polytropic disks We can extend the dusty/adiabatic gas correspondence to other fixed equations of state. As an example, consider the locally polytropic disk P = K(r, z)ρΓ g , (63) where K is a prescribed function and Γ is the constant polytropic index. Then eliminating fd from the dust equation 6 gives DP Dt = −ΓP∇ · v + P v · ∇ ln K + ΓP ρg ∇ · (fdts∇P ) . (64) Thus the dusty gas behaves like a pure gas with adiabatic index Γ. The entropy is given by Seff = lnhK 1/Γ(r, z) (1 − fd)i. (65) The results of §4.3 -- 4.4 remain valid for the strictly poly- tropic disk with K =constant, while one sets c2 s → K in §4.5. 7.3. Dusty analogs of other gaseous instabilities 7.3.1. Classic gravitational instabilities The addition of dust enhances gravitational instability (GI) because dust particles contribute to the total disk mass but not thermal pressure, which effectively low- ers the disk temperature (Thompson & Stevenson 1988; Shi & Chiang 2013). For typical dust-loading fd, Z ≪ 1, this effect is unimportant. However, if ǫ is large (e.g. due to dust settling) then the reduced temperature eT = T (1 − fd) may be lowered to enable instability. As noted in §3.1, dust settling causes eT to increase away from the midplane. This contrasts to previ- ous studies of GI in vertically stratified disks where the temperature decreases from the midplane (e.g. Mamatsashvili & Rice 2010; Kim et al. 2012; Lin 2014). While we expect only the total surface density and char- acteristic temperatures are relevant to stability (Toomre 1964), a non-trivial vertical temperature structure, in- duced by dust, may modify the vertical structure of 3D waves and unstable modes. Another potential connection to previous results for gas disks is gravito-turbulence. Cooling, self-gravitating gaseous disks sustain a turbulent state where shock heat- ing due to gravitational instabilities are balanced by ra- diative cooling (Gammie 2001). Since dust-gas drift ap- pears as a diffusion or cooling in our framework (Eq. 15), it may be conceivable to have 'dusty gravito-turbulence'. As self-gravity increases the local density, the associated pressure maxima attract dust-particles, but the back- reaction onto the gas may try to flatten the pressure bump (Taki et al. 2016), thus enabling a quasi-steady state. 7.3.2. Rossby wave instability instability (RWI) The Rossby wave is a non- axisymmetric, 2D shear instability that operates in thin disks when it has radial structure (Lovelace et al. 1999; Li et al. 2000). These studies consider adiabatic pure gas and show instability is possible if there is an extremum in the generalized potential vorticity Vg = κ2S /2ΩΣg, where Sg = P/Σγ g is essentially the gas entropy. Here P should be interpreted as the vertically integrated pres- sure. The non-linear result of the RWI is vortex forma- tion (Li et al. 2001). −2/γ g The dusty/adiabatic gas analogy imply the condition for RWI in a polytropic dusty gas disk is an extremum κ2 2ΩΣ V = 1 K 2/Γ(cid:18)1 + Σd Σg(cid:19)2 . (66) Thus RWI may also be triggered by extrema in the dust-to-gas ratio, e.g. narrow dust rings/gaps. This may lead to direct formation of dusty vortices, as op- posed to dust-trapping by a pre-existing gas vortex (Barge & Sommeria 1995; Lyra & Lin 2013). 7.3.3. Convective overstability The 'convective overstability' (ConO) was discovered in pure gas, non-adiabatic, unstratified disk models where the radial buoyancy frequency is such that N 2 r ≡ Fr∂rS/CP < 0 and cooling times tcool ∼ Ω−1 K . This com- bination leads to growing epicycles (Klahr & Hubbard 2014; Lyra 2014; Latter 2016). Now consider a strictly isothermal dusty disk where the relevant entropy is dust-induced, Seff = − ln (1 + ρd/ρg). Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 15 Since Fr ∝ −∂rP > 0 in typical disk models, ConO would require ∂rSeff < 0, implying the dust-to-gas ratio increases outwards. This might be realized at special radial locations in protoplanetary disks, such as planet gaps. Dust-settling itself may also lead to the mid-plane dust-to-gas ratio to increase outwards (Takeuchi & Lin 2002). Isothermal disks have tcool = 0, so the pure gas ConO cannot exist. However, we have shown that dust-gas drag provides an effective energy source/sink to the mixture (§3.2). It would be interesting to explore whether or not dust-gas drag can play the role of cooling to enable a 'dusty convective overstability'. 7.3.4. Zombie vortices (ZVI) The 'zombie vortex instability' is a non- axisymmetric, non-linear instability discovered in pure gas disks (Marcus et al. 2015; Umurhan et al. 2016b). It operates by having finite-amplitude perturbations excit- ing 'critical layers', where the intrinsic wave frequency of the perturbation matches the local vertical buoyancy fre- quency (Marcus et al. 2013). These critical layers roll up into vortices, exciting further critical layers. The process repeats itself and the result is an array of vortices. Since the necessary physical ingredient for the ZVI is vertical buoyancy, it requires an almost purely adiabatic gas with long cooling times (tcoolΩK ≫ 1). This limits its applicability in typical protoplanetary disks to . 1AU (Lesur & Latter 2016; Malygin et al. 2017). However, this consideration assumes a dust-free disk as far as the dynamics is concerned. On the other hand, we have show that dust-loading in- duces an effective buoyancy even in isothermal disks. It is thus natural to ask whether or not the required adiabatic conditions for ZVI can be realized through dust-loading (specifically a vertical gradient in the dust-to-gas ratio), and thus produce 'dusty ZVI'. This may allow the zombie vortices to develop & 1AU in PPDs. 7.4. Implications for numerical simulations The one-fluid model with the terminal velocity approx- imation, Eq. 5 -- 7, has been applied to simulate dusty protoplanetary disks (Dipierro et al. 2015; Ragusa et al. 2017). These studies explicitly evolve the dust density. However, the dusty/adiabatic gas equivalence identi- fied in this paper means that one need not implement a separate module for simulating the dust component in locally isothermal/polytropic gas. The standard energy equation substitutes for the dust continuity equation. Thus pure gas dynamic codes can be used to simulate protoplanetary dusty disks. When the sound-speed cs (or K) is not constant and/or the dust-gas coupling is imperfect, ts 6= 0, one should add corresponding source terms in the energy equation (e.g. Eq. 64). The source term associated with dust-gas drag, C, is analogous to radiative diffusion (Price & Laibe 2015) or thermal con- duction, which is also common in modern hydrodynamics codes. We have taken advantage of the dusty/adiabatic gas equivalence to convert the popular Pluto5 hydrodynam- ics code (Mignone et al. 2007) into a dusty gas dynam- ics code appropriate for simulating protoplanetary disks 5 http://plutocode.ph.unito.it/ coupled to small dust. In fact, our code is unaware of the fact that it is modeling dusty gas. We will ap- ply this modified code -- dPluto -- to study dusty disk- planet interaction (Lin et al., in preparation). Prelimi- nary results show our approach reproduce features such as dusty rings associated with planet-induced gaps sim- ilar to that obtained from explicit two-fluid simulations (e.g. Dong et al. 2017). 8. SUMMARY In this paper, we examine the conditions under which the presence of dust can trigger instabilities in gaseous protoplanetary disks. To this end, we develop an analogy between isothermal dusty-gas and pure ideal gas. The correspondence arises because drag forces reduce the rel- ative velocity between gas and dust. In the limit of per- fect dust-gas coupling, with stopping time ts → 0, dust is entrained in the gas. Then the dust-to-gas ratio ρd/ρg is conserved following the flow. This property is analogous to entropy conservation following an adiabatic, pure gas. For finite drag, ts 6= 0, the dust content of a parcel of the dusty-gas mixture is no longer conserved. The par- cel can exchange dust particles with neighboring parcels. This is analogous to heat exchange between a parcel of pure gas and its surroundings. We explicitly show that for a fixed gas equation of state, the evolutionary equation for ρd/ρg may be re- placed by an effective energy equation. This leads to a natural definition of the effective entropy of isothermal dusty gas as Seff = ln(cid:18) c2 ρg + ρd(cid:19), sρg which implies that a non-uniform dust-to-gas ratio in- duces buoyancy forces. The effect of finite dust-gas fric- tion appears as an energy source term. This analogy with standard hydrodynamics with cooling/heating al- low us to find dusty analogs of gaseous instabilities, and provide thermodynamical interpretations of dust-drag in- stabilities. We obtain the equivalent Solberg-Hoiland criteria for the axisymmetric stability of strictly isothermal, perfectly-coupled dusty gas. Applying this to typical protoplanetary disks, we find that the vertical shear as- sociated with dust layers cannot lead to axisymmetric in- stabilities, however thin the dust layer is. Instead, sharp radial edges in the dust-to-gas ratio could destabilized the disk, as these imply sharp gradients in the disk's effective entropy profile. Alternatively, if the dust is ver- tically well-mixed, then any radial gradient in ρd/ρg can destabilize the disk. We apply our thermodynamic framework to inter- pret the streaming instability (SI, Youdin & Goodman 2005; Jacquet et al. 2011) and to generalize the gaseous vertical shear instability (VSI, Nelson et al. 2013; Lin & Youdin 2015) to dusty disks. We explicitly show in SI the evolution of gas pressure lags behind dust den- sity. In fact, this is a general property of overstabilities driven by dust-gas drag. It takes a finite time for the gas to respond to the dust motion. A lag implies there exists a time interval where the gas pressure of a parcel of the dusty-gas mixture is increasing whilst dust is already be- ing expelled. The dusty gas then does positive work that 16 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin amplifies oscillations. This interpretation is analogous to stellar pulsational instabilities (Cox 1967). For the VSI we find dust-loading is generally stabiliz- ing. In our disk models dust-loading does not affect VSI growth rates significantly, but meridional motions may be suppressed where the dust-induced vertical buoyancy dominates over vertical shear, consistent with our previ- ous study (Lin & Youdin 2015). Since the dust-induced buoyancy forces increase away from the midplane, we find dust-loading can stabilize 'surface modes' of the VSI, that would otherwise have the largest growth rates. We also show that radial variations in ρd/ρg can trigger a type of VSI, even when the usual sources of vertical shear -- vertical dust gradients and radial temperature gradi- ents -- are negligible. In a realistic disk, dust particles settle on a timescale tsettle ∼ 1/tsΩ2 K (Takeuchi & Lin 2002), compared with typical VSI growth timescales, tgrow ∼ 1/hgΩK. This suggest that particles with tsΩK . hg cannot settle against the VSI. On the other hand, larger particles with tsΩK & hg should settle to form a dusty midplane. In fact, our calculations suggest that settling would sta- bilize the disk against VSI, and allow further settling. The result may be a quiet, dusty midplane (unless non- axisymmetric instabilities develop, Chiang 2008) with VSI-turbulent gaseous atmospheres. We also discuss future applications of our thermody- namic framework to study dusty protoplanetary disks. Because isothermal dusty gas has an effective entropy, we suggest that purely hydrodynamic processes, such as the Rossby Wave Instability (Li et al. 2000) or the 'Zombie Vortex Instability' (Marcus et al. 2015), where entropy plays a role, could have dusty counter-parts. Furthermore, hydrodynamic instabilities driven by ther- mal cooling, in stably-stratified disks (Lin & Youdin 2015) or the 'Convective Overstability' (Klahr & Hubbard 2014; Lyra 2014), may also find dusty analogs because finite dust-gas drag is equivalent to a heat sink/source. such as VSI The dusty/adiabatic gas equivalence also offers a sim- ple way to simulate dusty protoplanetary disks using purely hydrodynamic codes. All that is required is a re- interpretation of the fluid variables and additional source terms in the usual energy equation. The latter is already available in many public codes. In a follow-up work we will apply this approach to study dusty disk-planet in- teraction. We thank P. Loren-Aguilar for initial discussions that motivated this study. We also thank C. Baruteau, R. Dong, J. Fung, S. Inutsuka, G. Laibe, W. Lyra, S.-J. Paardekooper, M. Pessah, and O. Umurhan for comments during the course of this project. This work is supported by the Theoretical Institute for Ad- vanced Research in Astrophysics (TIARA) based in Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astro- physics (ASIAA), NASA Astrophysics Theory Program grant NNX17AK59G, and the Steward Theory Fellow- ship at the University of Arizona. APPENDIX A. VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE Here we consider the more general equation of state for the gas with P = KρΓ g where K is a prescribed function of position and Γ is a constant. The effective energy equation is then Eq. 64, which generalizes Eq. 15. Assuming axisymmetry throughout, we linearize this equation along with Eq. 5, 7, and 11 to give: ∆ρ ρ ∆P P δρ ρ − δv · ∇ ln ρ = ∇ · δv, δP P − δv · ∇ ln P = Γ∇ · δv − δv · ∇ ln K − = iσ iσ = iσ iσ −iσδvr = 2Ωδvφ + r · δF − r · ∇δψ, δvz, iσδvφ = −iσδvz = z · δF − z · ∇δψ, ∇2δψ = 4πGδρ. ∂vφ ∂z κ2 2Ω δvr + δC P , (A1) (A2) (A3) (A4) (A5) (A6) where the linearized pressure force δF is given in Appendix B. Recall ∆ = δ + ξ · ∇ is the Lagrangian perturbation and ξ is the Lagrangian displacement. In addition, iσξ · ∇ = −δv · ∇ for axisymmetric flow. These equations do not assume the radially-local approximation used in numerical computations. Note that Eq. A1 -- A2 imply σ2 ∆P P ∆ρ∗ ρ = Γ∇ · δv2 − ∇ · δv∗(cid:18)δv · ∇ ln K + δC P (cid:19) , (A7) so the first (real) term on the right hand side does not contribute to Im (∆P ∆ρ∗). Setting K to constant and taking the imaginary part gives Eq. 35. From the linearized meridional momentum equations, we find σ2Z ρ(cid:0)δvr2 + δvz2(cid:1) dV =Z (cid:18)ρκ2δvr2 + ρr ∂Ω2 ∂z δvzδv∗ r + iσρδF · δv∗ − iσρ∇δψ · δv∗(cid:19) dV, (A8) where the integral is taken over the volume of the fluid. Integrating by parts and ignoring surface integrals, the last term is Isothermal dusty gas dynamics 17 Z iσρδF · δv∗dV =Z (cid:18)iσ =Z (cid:18)iσ =Z (cid:20)(cid:18)iσ =Z (cid:20)iσ =Z (cid:26)(cid:20)∇ · δv + δv∗ · ∇P − iσδv∗ · ∇δP(cid:19) dV δv∗ · ∇P + iσδP∇ · δv∗(cid:19) dV δρ ρ δρ ρ δP ΓP − δv · ∇Seff + δP ΓP δv Γ · ∇ ln P − δv Γ · ∇ ln K + (δv∗ · ∇P + ΓP∇ · δv∗) + (δv∗ · ∇P )(cid:18) δv δv Γ · ∇ ln K − δC ΓP δC ΓP(cid:19) δv∗ · ∇P + iσδP∇ · δv∗(cid:21) dV δC ΓP − δv · ∇Seff(cid:19)(cid:21) dV Γ · ∇ ln K + .(cid:21) (δv∗ · ∇P + ΓP∇ · δv∗) =Z (cid:20) 1 P (cid:19)(cid:21) dV, where Seff ≡ ln (P 1/Γ/ρ). The self-gravitational part of Eq. A8 is, again neglecting surface terms when integrating by parts, ΓP − δv · ∇Seff(cid:19)(cid:27) dV − (δv∗ · ∇P ) (δv · ∇Seff ) − P (∇ · δv∗)(cid:18)δv · ∇ ln K + + (δv∗ · ∇P )(cid:18) δv ΓP(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)δv · ∇P + ΓP∇ · δv(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Γ · ∇ ln K + (A9) δC δC 2 −Z iσρ∇δψ · δv∗ =Z iσδψ∇ · (ρδv∗) dV =Z σ2 δψδρ∗dV = − 1 4πGZ σ2 ∇ψ2 dV, (A10) where the linearized continuity and Poisson equations have been used. Hence, σ2Z ρ(cid:0)δvr2 + δvz2(cid:1) dV =Z (cid:26)ρδvr2(cid:18)κ2 − ∂P ∂r 1 ρ + 1 ΓP(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)δv · ∇P + ΓP∇ · δv(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) ∂Seff ∂r (cid:19) + ρδvz2(cid:18)− ∂Seff ∂P ∂z ∂z (cid:19) + ρδvzδv∗ r(cid:18)r z δvr(cid:18)− 4πG σ∇δψ2(cid:27) dV −Z P (∇ · δv∗) (δv · ∇ ln K) dV −Z (∇ · δv∗) δCdV. ∂z (cid:19) + ρδv∗ ∂Ω2 ∂z − ∂P ∂r ∂Seff − 1 ρ 1 ρ 1 ρ 1 2 ∂P ∂z ∂Seff ∂r (cid:19) (A11) Note that the coefficient of δvzδv∗ gravitating case with Γ = 1, K = c2 (1993); Latter & Ogilvie (2006). r and δv∗ z δvr are equal owing to the equilibrium state (Eq. 23). The non-self- s gives Eq. 26. Similar integral relations are given by Kato (1978); Kley et al. B. LINEARIZED PRESSURE FORCES AND ITS DIVERGENCE The linearized form of the pressure force F = −∇P/ρ is δρ ρ δF = − F − 1 ρ∇δP, with divergence ρ ∇ · F + ∇ ln ρ · ∇δP The explicit forms for δF and ∇ · δF , in the radially-local approximation, are ∇ · δF = −∇(cid:18) δρ ρ(cid:19) · F − ρ − δρ 1 ρ∇2δP. δFr = −W Fr − ikxQ, δFz = −W Fz −(cid:2)Q′ + Q (ln ρ)′(cid:3) = −iσδvz + δψ′, (B1) (B2) (B3) (B4) 18 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin where the last equality is the linearized vertical momentum equation; and ∇ · δF = Fr (∂r ln ρ − ikx) W − FzW ′ − W∇ · F + ikxQ∂r ln ρ + (ln ρ)′(cid:2)Q′ + Q (ln ρ)′(cid:3) + k2 = [(∂r ln ρ − ikx) Fr − ∇ · F + F ′ xQ −nQ′′ + 2Q′ (ln ρ)′ + Qh(ln ρ)′′ + (ln ρ)′2io z] W +(cid:0)ikx∂r ln ρ + k2 C. LINEARIZED DUST DIFFUSION x(cid:1) Q − iσδv′ z + δψ′′. We consider small grains in the Epstein regime, with fixed internal density and size, so that ts = K ρcs (Price & Laibe 2015), where K is a constant. Then the dust diffusion function becomes 1 2 F(cid:19) = −Kcs(cid:18)F · ∇fd + fd∇ · F − s∇ · (fdts∇P ) = −Kc2 s∇ ·(cid:18) fd C ≡ c2 cs s(cid:19) . fdF · ∇ ln c2 Linearizing, − δC Kcs = F · ∇δfd + δF · ∇fd + δfd∇ · F + fd∇ · δF − 1 2∇ ln c2 s · (F δfd + fdδF ) . The linearized dust-fraction δfd and its derivatives in the radially-local approximation are given by δfd = (1 − fd)W − Q c2 s , ∂rδfd = [(1 − fd) (ikx − ∂r ln ρ) − ∂rfd] W +(cid:0)∂r ln c2 s + ∂r ln ρ − ikx(cid:1) Q c2 s , δf ′ d = (1 − fd)W ′ − f ′ s(cid:19)′ dW −(cid:18) Q c2 . (B5) (C1) (C2) (C3) (C4) (C5) (C6) D. ONE-FLUID DISPERSION RELATION FOR THE STREAMING INSTABILITY We consider an unstratified disk with Φ = Φ(r) (by setting z = 0 in Eq. 10) so that ∂zP = ∂zρ = 0. The background ∂rP/ρ, fd are constant input parameters. We Fourier analyze in r and z so that ∂z → ikz and ∂r → ikx when acting on perturbations, and denote k2 ≡ k2 z . We consider large kx and thus neglect background gradients when compared to that of perturbations. This is also done in most local studies of dusty disks (e.g. Youdin & Johansen 2007). The linearized equations are, after eliminating the azimuthal velocity: x + k2 iσW = ∇ · δv = ikxδvx + ikzδvz, σ2δvx = κ2δvx − iσFrW + kxσQ, −iσδvz = −ikzQ, iζσQ = P ρ ∇ · δv − δC ρ . (D1) (D2) (D3) (D4) The artificial factor ζ = 1 is inserted to keep track of the left-hand-side of the energy equation. Setting ζ to zero is equivalent to assuming incompressible gas (Jacquet et al. 2011). The linearized dust diffusion function (Appendix C), under the above approximations, is We eliminate the velocity perturbations to obtain − δC ρ = tsc2 s(cid:2)ikxFr (1 − 2fd) W + fdk2Q(cid:3) . sfdk2(cid:1) Q = i(cid:20) P (cid:0)iζσ − tsc2 σ2(cid:0)κ2 − σ2 − ikxFr(cid:1) W =(cid:0)k2 z κ2 − σ2k2(cid:1) Q, σ + kxtsc2 ρ sFr (1 − 2fd)(cid:21) W, (D5) (D6) (D7) which yields the dispersion relation Isothermal dusty gas dynamics c2 ζ ζ sk2 σ5 + ifdtsσ4 −(cid:20) k(cid:19)2 + (1 − fd)(cid:18) kzκ sk2(cid:0)κ2 − ikxFr(cid:1) + (1 − fd)(cid:21) σ3 − its(cid:2)fdκ2 − ikxFr (1 − fd)(cid:3) σ2 k(cid:19)2 σ + kxtsFr (1 − 2fd)(cid:18) kzκ = 0. c2 The equation of state P = c2 s (1 − fd) ρ was used. D.1. Incompressible gas limit 19 (D8) We can set ζ = 0 or consider c2 s → ∞ to obtain the incompressible gas limit. Using τs ≡ ts/ (1 − fd), we obtain: k(cid:19)2 ifdτsσ4 − σ3 − τs(cid:2)ifdκ2 + kxFr (1 − fd)(cid:3) σ2 +(cid:18) kzκ k(cid:19)2 σ + kxτsFr (1 − 2fd)(cid:18) kzκ = 0, (D9) as derived by Jacquet et al. (2011) and Laibe & Price (2014) for the streaming instability. If σ/ΩK = O(τsΩK) and τsΩK ≪ 1, then the quartic term is small and may be neglected. In that case we obtain the cubic dispersion relation of Youdin & Goodman (2005). D.2. Approximate solutions in the dust-rich limit Here we seek analytic solutions for the streaming instability by examining limiting cases and with additional approx- imations. We will fix kz, fd and maximize growth rates over kx. It turns out simple solutions exist in the dust-rich case with fd near unity. We consider small stopping times, τs → 0, and assume that the corresponding optimum kx → ∞. We begin with the incompressible dispersion relation, Eq. D9. We assume a Keplerian disk (Ω = κ = ΩK), and low frequency modes (σ ≪ ΩK), which allows us to neglect the quartic term. (This is also necessary to avoid spurious modes, see §D.3.) In dimensionless form, the dispersion relation is Kx(cid:19)2 ν3 + St [ifd + 2Kxfg (1 − fd)] ν2 −(cid:18) Kz Kx(cid:19)2 ν − 2StKxfg (1 − 2fd)(cid:18) Kz = 0, (D10) where ν = σ/ΩK, St = τsΩK, fg = 1 − fd (the gas fraction), and recall Kx,z = ηrkx,z. We have used Fr = 2ηfgrΩ2 and considered large Kx. Analytic expressions for cubic roots are unwieldy. To keep the problem tractable, let us assume at this stage that the quadratic term can be neglected compare to the last term. That is, (The imaginary term can be neglected for fixed fd but allowing Kx → ∞.) We show in §D.2.2 that this simplification is valid for dust-rich disks. ifd 2Kxfg (cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) + (1 − fd)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:12) Kxν2 ≪ K 2 z (2fd − 1) . (D11) (D12) (D13) (D14) (D15) (D16) Eq. D10 now becomes the depressed cubic ν3 − Pν = Q, where P and Q can be read off Eq. D10. This can be solved with Vieta's substitution ν = µ + P 3µ , then Eq. D12 becomes a quadratic for µ3, µ6 − Qµ3 + P 3 27 = 0. The solution is µ3 = Q 2 1 ±r1 − K 2 z Kx(1 ±s1 − K 2 z x [StKxfg (1 − 2fd)]2) . 27K 2 At this point we assume the term ∝ K 2 z inside the square root may be neglected. That is, 4P 3 27Q2! = Stfg(1 − 2fd) xSt(cid:1)2 z ≪ 27(cid:0)K 2 K 2 [fg (1 − 2fd)]2 . We show in §D.2.2 that this is readily satisfied. Then µ ≃ Q1/3. 20 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin Now, remembering that we are considering the dust-rich limit with 1 − 2fd < 0, the explicit solution for µ is We have chosen the complex root for instability. Inserting this into Eq. D13 gives the eigenfrequency ν: Re (ν) = Im (ν) = K 2 z eiπ/3. 1 √3 Kx(cid:21)1/3 µ =(cid:20)2Stfg (2fd − 1) (cid:17) , 2(cid:16)ASt1/3K −1/3 + BSt−1/3K −5/3 2 (cid:16)ASt1/3K −1/3 (cid:17) , − BSt−1/3K −5/3 z(cid:3)1/3 A =(cid:2)2fg (2fd − 1) K 2 x x x x , B = . K 2 z 3A where (D17) (D18) (D19) (D20) (D21) (D22) (D23) Maximizing growth rates over Kx by setting ∂ Im (ν)/∂Kx = 0, we find the optimum wavenumber is given by The maximum growth rate is then Kx =(cid:18) 5B St−1/2 =(cid:18) 5 A(cid:19)3/4 2√3A5/4 55/4B1/4 max [Im (ν)] = √St = . Kz 2fg (2fd − 1) St 3(cid:19)3/4s 2√2 × 33/4 55/4 qfg (2fd − 1) KzSt. and the real frequency Re (ν) = (√3/2) Im (ν). We see that as τs → 0, the most unstable radial wavenumber diverges, → ∞ with a vanishing growth rate, max(s) ∝ √τs → 0. This corresponds to instability at arbitrarily Kx ∝ τ small radial length scales. −1/2 s D.2.1. Finite phase lag as τs → 0 An interesting property of the special solutions described above is that there is always a phase lag between the Lagrangian pressure and density perturbations. Since Re (ν) > 0, the phase lag may be defined as ϕ = arg (∆P ∆ρ∗). It may be shown that in the limit of large Kx that (Note that we may set ∆ρ = 1 without loss of generality.) ∆P ≃ iδvx∂rP/σ. To obtain δvx we use Eq. D2 in the low frequency limit. The expression for δvx involves the Eulerian pressure perturbation, δP , for which we use Eq. D6 and assume incompressibility (ζ → 0). With these additional simplifications the phase lag ϕ is given via tan ϕ = Im (∆P ∆ρ∗) Re (∆P ∆ρ∗) ≃ Kx Im (ν) 2f 2 g StK 2 x + Kx Re (ν) . (D24) From here it is clear for the above solutions, where Kx ∝ St−1/2 and ν ∝ St1/2, that ϕ is a constant. Explicitly inserting the solutions give For the case shown in Fig. 4 with fd = 0.75, we have ϕ ≃ 26◦, comparable to the ∼ 30◦ obtained from numerical solutions. tan ϕ = 2 × 33/2 (2fd − 1) 16 − 7fd . (D25) Here we check if the above explicit solutions are consistent with the assumptions used to obtain them. Inserting the solutions for the most unstable mode we find Eq. D11 becomes D.2.2. Consistency check Since fd ≤ 1, this requirement can only be marginally satisfied. However, we find that this mostly give errors in the real frequency (see Fig. 4), while growth rates are still captured correctly. On the other hand, the assumption of Eq. D16 becomes the trivial inequality fd ≫ 12 17 ≃ 0.7. (D26) 27 4 (cid:18) 5 3(cid:19)3 1 ≪ ≃ 30, (D27) K Ω / s 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 10-4 Isothermal dusty gas dynamics Kx=1500, ρd=2ρg, τsΩK=0.01 21 streaming instability spurious dusty epicycle 10-2 100 Kz 102 104 Figure 16. Growth rates of dust-drag instabilities with fixed radial wavenumber and dust-to-gas ratio, as a function of the vertical wavenumber at fix stopping time. so Eq. D16 is satisfied, which justifies the approximate solution for µ in Eq. D17. Ultimately, the validity of these assumptions are justified a posteriori by comparison with the solution to the full equations in Fig. 4. A caveat of the dispersion relations Eq. D8 and D9 is that they admit spurious unstable modes with σ & Ω. This violates the one-fluid approximation to model dusty gas. We demonstrate this below by considering the incompressible dispersion relation. (We checked numerically that compressibilty has negligible effects on the modes examined.) D.3. Spuriously growing epicycles Consider the limit kz = 0. Then Eq. D9 becomes iν2 − ν fdSt −(cid:20)i + 2Kx fg fd (1 − fd)(cid:21) = 0 (D28) in dimensionless form. Neglecting the quadratic term leads to stability, Im (ν) < 0. This is consistent with a full two-fluid analysis (Youdin & Goodman 2005). However, solving Eq. D28 explicitly assuming fdτs Im (ν) ≪ 1 would yield Re (ν) ≃ 2Kx (1 − fd)2 St ∼ O(1) Im (ν) ≃ fdSth4K 2 x (1 − fd)4 St2 − 1i . St > 1 2Kx (1 − fd)2 (D29) (D30) (D31) Accordingly, growth is possible if Alternatively, for fixed τs growth is enabled by a sufficiently large Kx. Unlike the streaming instability, which is strongly suppressed when fd = 1/2, these modes can still grow at equal dust-to-gas ratio. These growing epicycles with ω & κ are absent in full two-fluid models (Youdin & Goodman 2005). The discrepancy lies in the fact that the one-fluid equations, to first order in τs, are only valid for low-frequency waves with σ . Ω. Thus only low-frequency modes should be retained from analyses based on Eqs. 5 -- 8. Fig. 16 show unstable modes found from Eq. D8 as a function of Kz at fixed Kx = 1500, ǫ = 2 and τsΩK = 0.01. The (spurious) overstable dusty epicycles' growth rates are weakly dependent on Kz and are well approximated by that in the Kz = 0 limit, Eq. D30. For the case considered in Fig. 16 we find s ≃ 0.067ΩK, as observed. By contrast, the streaming instability requires Kz > 0, and dominates when Kz & 100. 22 M-K. Lin, A.N. Youdin Care must be taken if the first-order one-fluid equations are used to simulate dusty gas. For example, 2D, razor-thin disks would allow the spurious epicycles to dominate, since in that case the streaming instability cannot operate. However, Fig. 16 show that in realistic 3D disks where a range of Kz is allowed, the streaming instability should dominate. Thus simulations based on the first-order one-fluid equations should be set up to suppress these spurious epicycles. This might be achieved, for example, through physical or numerical viscosity to eliminate high-kx modes, since for fixed disk/dust parameters these spurious epicycles only operate at sufficiently small radial wavelengths. Alternatively, one needs to ensure the physical instabilities of interest have larger growth rates than the spurious epicycles. REFERENCES Ayliffe, B. A., Laibe, G., Price, D. J., & Bate, M. R. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1450 Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2010a, ApJ, 722, 1437 -- . 2010b, ApJS, 190, 297 Barge, P., & Sommeria, J. 1995, A&A, 295, L1 Barker, A. J., & Latter, H. N. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 21 Barranco, J. A. 2009, ApJ, 691, 907 Barri`ere-Fouchet, L., Gonzalez, J.-F., Murray, J. R., Humble, R. J., & Maddison, S. T. 2005, A&A, 443, 185 Baruteau, C., & Zhu, Z. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3927 Chiang, E. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1549 Chiang, E., & Youdin, A. N. 2010, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 38, 493 Chiang, E. I., & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368 Cox, J. P. 1967, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 28, Aerodynamic Phenomena in Stellar Atmospheres, ed. R. N. Thomas, 3 Dipierro, G., Price, D., Laibe, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, L73 Dong, R., Li, S., Chiang, E., & Li, H. 2017, ApJ, 843, 127 Fu, W., Li, H., Lubow, S., Li, S., & Liang, E. 2014, ApJ, 795, L39 Gammie, C. F. 1996, ApJ, 457, 355 -- . 2001, ApJ, 553, 174 Gibbons, P. G., Mamatsashvili, G. R., & Rice, W. K. M. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 4232 Goldreich, P., & Ward, W. R. 1973, ApJ, 183, 1051 Hopkins, P. F., & Squire, J. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1707.02997 Jacquet, E., Balbus, S., & Latter, H. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3591 Johansen, A., Henning, T., & Klahr, H. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1219 Johansen, A., & Youdin, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 627 Kato, S. 1978, MNRAS, 185, 629 Kim, J.-G., Kim, W.-T., Seo, Y. M., & Hong, S. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 131 Klahr, H., & Hubbard, A. 2014, ApJ, 788, 21 Kley, W., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Lin, D. N. C. 1993, ApJ, 409, 739 Kowalik, K., Hanasz, M., W´olta´nski, D., & Gawryszczak, A. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1460 Laibe, G., & Price, D. J. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2345 -- . 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2136 Lambrechts, M., Johansen, A., Capelo, H. L., Blum, J., & Bodenschatz, E. 2016, A&A, 591, A133 Latter, H. N. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2608 Latter, H. N., & Ogilvie, G. I. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1829 Latter, H. N., & Rosca, R. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1923 Lee, A. T., Chiang, E., Asay-Davis, X., & Barranco, J. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1367 Lesur, G. R. J., & Latter, H. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4549 Li, H., Colgate, S. A., Wendroff, B., & Liska, R. 2001, ApJ, 551, 874 Li, H., Finn, J. M., Lovelace, R. V. E., & Colgate, S. A. 2000, ApJ, 533, 1023 Lin, M.-K. 2014, ApJ, 790, 13 Lin, M.-K., & Kratter, K. M. 2016, ApJ, 824, 91 Lin, M.-K., & Youdin, A. N. 2015, ApJ, 811, 17 Lor´en-Aguilar, P., & Bate, M. R. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 927 -- . 2015, MNRAS, 453, L78 -- . 2016, MNRAS, 457, L54 Lovelace, R. V. E., Li, H., Colgate, S. A., & Nelson, A. F. 1999, ApJ, 513, 805 Lyra, W. 2014, ApJ, 789, 77 Lyra, W., & Lin, M.-K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 17 Malygin, M. G., Klahr, H., Semenov, D., Henning, T., & Dullemond, C. P. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1704.06786 Mamatsashvili, G. R., & Rice, W. K. M. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2050 Marcus, P. S., Pei, S., Jiang, C.-H., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 87 Marcus, P. S., Pei, S., Jiang, C.-H., & Hassanzadeh, P. 2013, Physical Review Letters, 111, 084501 Meheut, H., Meliani, Z., Varniere, P., & Benz, W. 2012, A&A, 545, A134 Michikoshi, S., Kokubo, E., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2012, ApJ, 746, 35 Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228 Nelson, R. P., & Gressel, O. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 639 Nelson, R. P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O. M. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2610 Ogilvie, G. I. 2016, Journal of Plasma Physics, 82, doi:10.1017/S0022377816000489 Paardekooper, S.-J., & Mellema, G. 2006, A&A, 453, 1129 Price, D. J., & Laibe, G. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 813 Ragusa, E., Dipierro, G., Lodato, G., Laibe, G., & Price, D. J. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1449 Samadi, R., Belkacem, K., & Sonoi, T. 2015, in EAS Publications Series, Vol. 73, EAS Publications Series, 111 -- 191 Shi, J.-M., & Chiang, E. 2013, ApJ, 764, 20 Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Li, R., & Youdin, A. N. 2016, ApJ, 822, 55 Squire, J., & Hopkins, P. F. 2017, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1706.05020 Stamatellos, D., & Whitworth, A. P. 2008, A&A, 480, 879 Surville, C., Mayer, L., & Lin, D. N. C. 2016, ApJ, 831, 82 Takahashi, S. Z., & Inutsuka, S.-i. 2014, ApJ, 794, 55 -- . 2016, AJ, 152, 184 Takeuchi, T., & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, ApJ, 581, 1344 Taki, T., Fujimoto, M., & Ida, S. 2016, A&A, 591, A86 Tassoul, J. 1978, Theory of rotating stars Thompson, C., & Stevenson, D. J. 1988, ApJ, 333, 452 Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Umurhan, O. M., Nelson, R. P., & Gressel, O. 2016a, A&A, 586, A33 Umurhan, O. M., Shariff, K., & Cuzzi, J. N. 2016b, ApJ, 830, 95 Ward, W. R. 2000, On Planetesimal Formation: The Role of Collective Particle Behavior, ed. R. M. Canup, K. Righter, & et al., 75 -- 84 Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57 Yang, C.-C., & Johansen, A. 2014, ApJ, 792, 86 -- . 2016, ApJS, 224, 39 Youdin, A., & Johansen, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 613 Youdin, A. N. 2011, ApJ, 731, 99 Youdin, A. N., & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459 Youdin, A. N., & Shu, F. H. 2002, ApJ, 580, 494 Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., Rafikov, R. R., & Bai, X.-n. 2014, ApJ, 785, 122

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.