anchor.diff:    | work.
     | 
     | Each expert judge will be asked to review an initial batch of 5-10 entries.
  -  | After they do their initial batch, judges will also be encouraged to review
  +  | After they do their initial batch, judges will be encouraged to review
     | a handful more of the top entries that pique their interest.  Experts will
     | not be allowed to vote for people who they know.
     | 
  
positive.code:   | to do the honorable thing.
    | 
    | We will be implementing a zero tolerance policy towards cheating.  If you
    | are provably caught cheating, you will be disqualified immediately, banned
    | from all future events, generally be thought of as a bad person by all of
    | the organizers and potentially many, many more people.  Trust us, it's not
    | worth the risk.
    | 
    | ### Summary
    | 
    | There's no system of voting that will make everybody happy.  Our decisions
    | are based on lessons from dozens of other competitions and we believe that
    | they're going to make for a great Knockout.
    | 
    | But it’s important to remember at the end of the day, even if you don’t
    | win, you’ll still have had a great time, built something awesome, and
    | gotten a ton of exposure for your idea.
    | 
    | Interested in judging? [Contact us](mailto:all@nodeknockout.com).
    | 
  
negative.code:   | be asked to [grade along a curve] with a mean of 3.5.
    | 
    | The hope is that this will allow every entry to get at least 2-3 thoughtful
    | expert reviews and that the best entries will get enough reviews that the
    | [law of large numbers] ensures fairness.
    | 
    | ### Public Voting
    | 
    | Any member of the general public may vote.  You are encouraged to get as many
    | people as possible to vote for your entry. Voting will be very easy (yes, your
    | mom will be able to do it).
    | 
    | General public voters must meet the following requirements:
    | 
    | - They need a valid e-mail address (we will ask them to verify their
    |   votes by e-mail).
    | - They need to vote for at least 5 entries before **any** of their
    |   votes count.
    | 
    | We will implement a number of mechanisms to detect and to eliminate
    | ballot stuffing, but the honor code applies (see the cheating
    | section below).
    | 
    | ### Evaluation
    | 
    | Entries will be judged on a 1-5 scale across 4 dimensions:
    | 
    | - **Usefulness** - How useful is the service provided?
    | - **Appearance** - How good does it look?
    | - **Innovation** - How original is the idea and execution?
    | - **Completeness** - How "fully baked" is the site? Are there bugs or dead ends?
    | 
    | ### Calculation
    | 
    | A team's score will be determined by adding the expert
    | judge score and the public score for each dimension.
    | 
    | In addition, there will be a popularity component derived from each entry's
    | public vote count.
    | 
    | The overall score will be the average of all 5 components
    | (usefulness, appearance, innovation, completeness and popularity).
    | 
    | ### Prizes
    | 
    | There will be the following 7 prize categories:
    | 
    | - **Overall** - the best overall score
    | - **Solo** - the best overall score for a one-person team
    | - **Usefulness** - the highest usefulness score
    | - **Appearance** - the highest appearance score
    | - **Innovation** - the highest innovation score
    | - **Completeness** - the highest completeness score
    | - **Popularity** - the entry with the most public votes
    | 
    | A team may only win one prize and will earn the highest prize (in the above
    | rank order) for which it qualifies, opening its spot in the running for
  