anchor.diff:  
   block current
   
  -  h3.note Note: This is an unreleased in development project. If you get this link is because I know you directly, please don't share it yet because is incomplete. I'm looking for feedback, suggestions and I'm sure if you had this link is because you can provide valuable insight on this issue ;) Thanks
  +  h3.note Note: This is an as yet unreleased project that is still in development. If you have received this link it is because I know you personally. Please don't share the link yet because the current website is still incomplete. I'm looking forward to hear your feedback and suggestions. I'm sure that if you have this link it is because you can provide valuable insight on this issue. ;) Thanks
   
   block what
   
  -  p The filter bubble is a social problem, not a personal problem. The effect is in the massess misinformation, and only with a collective effort we can measure it, understand it, resist against it.
  +  p The filter bubble is a social problem, not a personal one. The effect is the misinformation of the masses. Only through a collective effort we can measure the problem, understand it, and resist it.
   
  -  p The filter bubble is personal and subjective: you can't see it on your own because you're inside. Also, if you put attention on it, you'll probably have the knowledge to escape. Comparing your filter bubble with the multiture of user, we can understand the logic behind Facebook penalizing or promoting content.
  +  p The filter bubble is personal and subjective: You can't see it your own bubble because you're inside it. But, if you focus your attention on it, you can probably accumulate the knowledge to escape. By comparing your filter bubble with those of other users, you can start to understand the logic behind why Facebook penalizes or promotes certain content.
   
  -  p Censoring content is much easier with algorithm than takedown: if a content get removed, it is clear to everybody. If a content get heavily penalized in the bubble logic, is "the Algorithm fault":
  -    b the perfect tecnocratic scapegoat.
  -    | In such case is nobody guilt. This project will act as a third party able to see how much content get faily seen by users.
  +  p Censoring content through algorithms is much easier than taking it down: If certain content gets removed, this can be seen by everybody. Yet if certain content gets heavily penalized through the logic of the bubble, then it is only "the algorithm's fault":
  +    b It is the perfect technocratic scapegoat.
  +    | In such a case nobody is guilty. This project's aim is to act as a third party that is able to see how much and which content gets rarely seen by users.
   
  -  p Joining facebook.tracking.exposed, you can extract the meta-data of what Facebook is giving to you, and thus an open community of researchers can
  +  p By joining facebook.tracking.exposed, you can extract the meta-data that Facebook is giving you, and thus an open community of researchers can
       b  analyze algorithm outcomes and keep Facebook accountable.
  -  | It would be hard, but is a beginning.
  +  | It will be hard, but it is only the beginning.
       
   block how
   
  
positive.code:   .link.right 
      a(href="https://auditingalgorithms.wordpress.com/background-readings/") Auding Algorithm, I've still to read them
    .link.left 
      a(href="https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601696/facebooks-rules-for-experimenting-on-you/") Facebook rules on experimenting on you, or at least what they decided can tell you
    .link.right 
      a(href="http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/726-Facebook-Tracking.html") Technical analysis of Facebook tracking
    .link.left 
      a(href="https://digitalmarketplace.blog.gov.uk/2016/06/16/an-open-standard-for-public-procurement-and-contracting-data/") Vagously related
    .link.right 
      a(href="http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZB00M") Google, Facebook quietly move toward automatic blocking of extremist videos
    .link.left 
  
negative.code:     | you can reach me at claudio@tracking.exposed
      |, I used to work on the anonymous whistleblowing framework 
      a(href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlobaLeaks") GlobaLeaks
      |), and in the last two years I have spent most of my time at
      a(href="https://tacticaltech.org") TacticalTech.
  
    p.smaller Despite me sharing my Twitter handle above, I don't want to endorse centralized services, but in this phase of the project I see the compromise one has to take between a huge outreach and the practical tool that has become the de facto standard. Sooner or later there will be published a personal policy in identity compartimentalisation (what does this sentence mean).
  
    h4.harsh personal rant
    p I'm in love with technopolitics, I believe in 2016 the goal of a cypherpunk is no longer "encrypt evertything". The power dynamics online have changed since the early '00. Now transnational corporation use 
      a(href='https://medium.com/@_vecna/whatsapp-security-santa-or-cryptography-as-cost-reduction-40a201b46708') crypto as cost reduction
      |, the challenges nowadays are others.
    p Challenging the network monopolies, challenging massive profiling, and the business dynamics supporting this, is my primary concern now. Telco, Big Data industries, and nations are in a fight against themselves. This offers a new opening for users, in this malebolge(what is this word?), we have to at least guarantee the preservation of human rights on the Internet and challenge abuses when they arise.
    p It is clear that the speed of institution is <<- this sentence I do not understand, is it finished?) The tools are a mix of technology, political activism, and network sense (what does noetwork sense mean?).
  
    h4.harsh The harsh truth ;)
    p I do not have the capacity to look for funding. I'm (mostly) a technician, and writing funding requests is not exactly my best way to invest time. If you believe in this project, consider tipping here (TODO donation page), or do some kind of fundraising.
  
  block moar (moar?)
  
    p The Filter Bubble is more of a social issue than a personal issue: You can spend effort to escape it, and actively keep in mind that it exists, but this is a minority questioning what they are perceiveing (what does the last sentence mean or relate to?). 
    P Society is undefended against an entity that can influence our learning process, so
    p What I want is: to have only chronologically unfiltered content. The decision of which algorithms, visualisations, correlations, suggestions, and meta-data will happen lies on the client's side. User choice.
  
    .link.right 
      a(href="https://medium.com/message/ferguson-is-also-a-net-neutrality-issue-6d2f3db51eb0") Ferguson crisis and how Facebook penalizes content 
      .smaller (6 minutes reading) by 
        a(href="https://twitter.com/zeynep") Zeynep Tufekci
      |It is good that a person like the author poses herself the question: But what about all the things you are not an expert in? Or you are not actively looking into knowing more? All those times, you will simply not notice how the Filter Bubble manipulates you.
    .link.left 
      a(href="https://theintercept.com/2016/06/09/facebook-outreach-tool-ignores-black-lives-matter/") SOME
    .link.right 
      a(href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/07/its-your-duty-to-complain-thats-how-companies-improve") SOME
    .link.left 
      a(href="https://hbr.org/2015/05/customer-data-designing-for-transparency-and-trust") This article is on customers data 
      |I share some points of this vision, I want to see a business model accessible to everyone on data analysis, and an OpenData regulation making clear which data are collected, how many, and which algorithms run over the data.
  
    .link.right 
      a(href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813") EU regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a right to explanation
  