anchor.diff:            <ul class='bullets'>
               <li><strong>Protected areas vs. the grayscale base map:</strong> The boundaries for protected areas on the Google grayscale base map do not always align with the protected areas from the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). In this case, the WDPA data set only includes official protected areas—defined regions formally protected by law at the national level—whereas the base map includes recreational areas and other informal green spaces. Furthermore, the WDPA data is approved and reported by individual countries, while Google’s base map is composed of data from a variety of sources. Therefore, the base map grayscale network of parks and protected areas is more expansive (and less defined) than that of the protected areas layer, causing visible incongruities between the two data sets.</li>
   
  -            <li><p><strong>Intact Forest Landscapes vs. tree cover extent:</strong> These data sets measure different things. Tree cover extent shows all 30 X 30 meter areas that meet a minimum threshold of tree cover (25% canopy cover), whereas Intact Forest Landscapes only show forests that show no significant signs of human activity (see the <%= link_to 'Data page', "#{sources_path}#forest_cover" %> for specifics).</p>
  +            <li><p><strong>Intact Forest Landscapes vs. tree cover extent:</strong> These data sets measure different things. Tree cover extent shows all 30 x 30 meter areas that meet a minimum threshold of tree cover (25% canopy cover), whereas Intact Forest Landscapes only show forests that show no significant signs of human activity (see the <%= link_to 'Data page', "#{sources_path}#forest_cover" %> for specifics).</p>
   
               <p>Users may find instances where tree cover extent does not fall within the boundaries of Intact Forest Landscapes. This is because the Intact Forest Landscapes layer is based on MODIS (250 meter resolution satellite imagery), which is known to overestimate low tree cover densities, whereas the tree cover extent layer is based on Landsat (30 meter resolution satellite imagery).  As a result, the tree cover extent layer may not show tree cover in an area that is covered by an intact forest landscape polygon.</p></li>
             </ul>
  
positive.code:           <p>GFW also brings together a dynamic community of partners with expertise in forest science, conservation, supply chain management, web development, citizen science, community outreach, and in-depth knowledge of priority forests around the world.</p>
  
            <h3 class='overview_title'>Who is behind Global Forest Watch?</h3>
            <p>GFW is supported by a diversity of partners that contribute data, technical capabilities, funding, and expertise. The partnership is convened by the World Resources Institute. Visit the <%= link_to 'GFW about page', about_path %> for a full list of partners.</p>
  
            <p>Interested in joining the GFW partnership? Email us <a href='mailto:gfw@wri.com'>here</a>.</p>
  
  
negative.code: 
          <div class='source_body'>
            <h3 class='overview_title'>What is Global Forest Watch?</h3>
            <p>Global Forest Watch (GFW) is a dynamic online forest monitoring and alert system that empowers people everywhere to better manage forests. For the first time, Global Forest Watch unites satellite technology, open data, and crowdsourcing to guarantee access to timely and reliable information about forests. GFW adheres to an <a href='https://github.com/Vizzuality/gfw' target='_blank'>open source</a> and <%= link_to 'open data', "#{sources_path}#data_policy" %> policy, providing access to data that are free for everyone. GFW is intended for use by governments, companies, NGOs, researchers, communities, and others seeking to better manage forests and improve local livelihoods.</p>
  
            <h3 class='overview_title'>Who can use it?</h3>
            <p>GFW aims to radically improve the availability, quality, and accessibility of forest data for everyone:</p>
  