anchor.diff:          <h2><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement</h2>
           <b>Editorial Board</b>
           <ul>
  -          <li>The <%= setting(:abbreviation) %> editorial board's members are recognized experts in the field. The full names and affiliations of the members are provided on the journal’s web site (see <%= setting(:url) %>/about#editorial_board). The individual editors' contact information are provided on that site, via their GitHub pages, and general contact information for the editorial office also on the journal’s Web site: <%= setting(:url) %>/about#contact)</li>
  +          <li>The <%= setting(:abbreviation) %> editorial board's members are recognized experts in the field. The full names and affiliations of the members are provided on the journal’s website (see <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#editorial_board">editorial board</a>). The individual editors' contact information are provided on that site, via their GitHub pages, and general contact information for the editorial office also on the <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#contact">journal’s website</a>.</li>
           </ul>
   
           <b>Authors and Authors responsibilities</b>
           <ul>
  -          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> does not charge any fees for manuscript processing and/or publishing materials, as is stated on the journal's web site (<%= setting(:url) %>/about#costs)</li>
  -
  -          <li>Authors are obliged to participate in peer review process, as described in submission guidelines (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#the-review-process).</li>
  -
  -          <li>All authors have significantly contributed to the research. The submitting author is required to be a major contributor to the software they are submitting (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#submission-requirements) and the review process includes a check that <em>‘the full list of paper authors seems appropriate and complete?’</em> (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#authorship)</li>
  -
  -          <li>All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes. (<%= setting(:url) %>/about#ethics and https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain)</li>
  -
  -          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> papers are required to have a list of references (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain), and financial support. (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain)</li>
  -
  -          <li>Forbidden to publish same research in more than one journal. (<%= setting(:url) %>/about#ethics)</li>
  +          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> does not charge any fees for manuscript processing and/or publishing materials, as is stated on the <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#costs">journal's website</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>Authors are obliged to participate in peer review process, as described in <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#the-review-process">submission guidelines</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>All authors have significantly contributed to the research. The submitting author is required to be a <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#submission-requirements">major contributor to the software</a> they are submitting and the review process includes a check that <em><a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#authorship">‘the full list of paper authors seems appropriate and complete?’</a></em>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes (see <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#ethics">ethics</a> and <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain">what should my paper contain?</a>).</li>
  +
  +          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> papers are required to have a <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain">list of references</a>, and <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain">financial support</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>Forbidden to publish same research in more than one journal (see <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#ethics">ethics</a>).</li>
           </ul>
   
           <b>Peer-review process</b>
           <ul>
  -          <li>All of <%= setting(:abbreviation) %>'s content is subjected to peer-review (http://joss.theoj.org/about and https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html)</li>
  -
  -          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> peer-review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers expert in the field (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#finding-reviewers). This advice is public, and is given to both the editor(s) and the author(s), with the aim of pointing out issues the reviewers believe are insufficiently address for publication (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#guiding-principles).</li>
  -
  -          <li>The <%= setting(:abbreviation) %> review process is clearly described on the journal’s Web site (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html).</li>
  -
  -          <li>Judgments should be objective (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#guiding-principles).</li>
  -
  -          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> reviewers should ideally have no conflict of interest. In practice, this is not always possible. If a reviewer has a conflict of interest, it must be declared and recorded, and the editors may choose to waive it if this is in the best interest of the review process (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#joss-conflict-of-interest-policy).</li>
  -
  -          <li>Reviewers should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#an-important-note-about-novel-software-and-citations-of-relevant-work.</li>
  +          <li>All of <%= setting(:abbreviation) %>'s content is subjected to peer-review (see <a href="http://joss.theoj.org/about">about</a> and <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html">docs</a>).</li>
  +
  +          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> peer-review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#finding-reviewers">expert in the field</a>. This advice is public, and is given to both the editor(s) and the author(s), with the aim of pointing out issues the reviewers believe are <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#guiding-principles">insufficiently addressed for publication</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>The <%= setting(:abbreviation) %> review process is clearly described on the <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html">journal’s website</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li>Judgments should be <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#guiding-principles">objective</a>.</li>
  +
  +          <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> reviewers should ideally have no conflict of interest. In practice, this is not always possible. If a reviewer has a conflict of interest, it must be declared and recorded, and the editors may <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#joss-conflict-of-interest-policy">choose to waive</a> it if this is in the best interest of the review process.</li>
  +
  +          <li>Reviewers should point out <a href="https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html#an-important-note-about-novel-software-and-citations-of-relevant-work">relevant published work</a> which is not yet cited.</li>
   
             <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> reviews are public and non-anonymous while in progress and post-review, as they take place via GitHub issues in a public repository.</li>
           </ul>
  
positive.code: 
          <b>Ownership and management</b>
          <ul>
            <li>Information about the ownership and/or management of a journal shall be clearly indicated on the journal’s web site. (http://www.theoj.org)</li>
            <li>JOSS and the Open Journals (http://www.theoj.org) do not use organizational names that would mislead potential authors and editors about the nature of the journal’s owner.</li>
          </ul>
  
          <b>Web site</b>
          <ul>
            <li>A journal’s Web site, including the text that it contains, shall demonstrate that care has been taken to ensure high ethical and professional standards. (see <%= setting(:url) %> and <%= setting(:url) %>/about)</li>
          </ul>
  
          <b>Publishing schedule</b>
  
negative.code: 
          <b>Copyright and Access</b>
          <ul>
            <li><%= setting(:abbreviation) %> copyright and licensing information is clearly described on the <a href="<%= setting(:url) %>/about#content_license">journal’s website</a>.</li>
            <li>The journal and all individual articles are freely available to all readers.</li>
          </ul>
  
  