anchor.diff:          <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover loss data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover and tree cover gain. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27" target="_blank">Open Data Portal</a>.</p>
   
           <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, loss of tree cover may occur for many reasons, including deforestation, fire, and logging within the course of sustainable forestry operations. Similarly, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
  +        
  +        <p class='credits'><strong>Citation:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” Science 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available online from: <a href='http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest' target='_blank'>http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest</a>.</p>
  +
  +          <p class='credits'><strong>Suggested citations for data as displayed on GFW:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA Tree Cover Loss by Climate Domain, Country Rankings.” University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [date]. <a href='http://www.globalforestwatch.org/' target='_blank'>www.globalforestwatch.org</a>.</p>
  +
  +          <p><em><a href='http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27' target='_blank'>Learn more or download data</a>.</p></em>
   
         </div>
       </li>
  
positive.code:         <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover loss data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover and tree cover gain. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss, and current (or post-2000) tree cover cannot be determined by subtracting annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27" target="_blank">Open Data Portal</a>.</p>
  
          <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, loss of tree cover may occur for many reasons, including deforestation, fire, and logging within the course of sustainable forestry operations.</p>
        </div>
      </li>
  
  
negative.code:         <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover loss and gain. Accordingly, current (or post-2000) tree cover cannot be determined by subtracting annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/7876b225f8034a0ebba79fad4afb80ad" target="_blank">Open Data Portal</a>.</p>
  
          <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations.</p>
          
          <p class='credits'><strong>Citation:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” Science 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available online from: <a href='http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest' target='_blank'>http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest</a>.</p>
  
            <p class='credits'><strong>Suggested citations for data as displayed on GFW:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA Tree Cover, Country Rankings.” University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [date]. <a href='http://www.globalforestwatch.org/' target='_blank'>www.globalforestwatch.org</a>.</p>
  
            <p><em><a href='http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/7876b225f8034a0ebba79fad4afb80ad' target='_blank'>Learn more or download data</a>.</p></em>
  
        </div>
      </li>
  