anchor.diff:          <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover loss data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover and tree cover gain. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27" target="_blank">Open Data Portal</a>.</p>
   
           <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, loss of tree cover may occur for many reasons, including deforestation, fire, and logging within the course of sustainable forestry operations. Similarly, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
  +        
  +        <p class='credits'><strong>Citation:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” Science 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available online from: <a href='http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest' target='_blank'>http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest</a>.</p>
  +
  +          <p class='credits'><strong>Suggested citations for data as displayed on GFW:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA Tree Cover Loss by Climate Domain, Country Rankings.” University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [date]. <a href='http://www.globalforestwatch.org/' target='_blank'>www.globalforestwatch.org</a>.</p>
  +
  +          <p><em><a href='http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27' target='_blank'>Learn more or download data</a>.</p></em>
   
         </div>
       </li>
  
positive.code: 
          <div class='source_table'>
            <p>Drag the handle to adjust the minimum tree cover canopy (TCC) density for Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA tree cover and tree cover loss displayed in the graphs and rankings. TCC density represents the estimated percent of a pixel that was covered by tree canopy in the year 2000, as determined from the analysis of satellite imagery. For the tree cover loss data, TCC density therefore corresponds to the density of tree cover <u>before</u> loss occurred.</p>
            <p>Adjustments to the minimum TCC density will only affect Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA tree cover and tree cover loss. This feature does not pertain to Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA tree cover gain or to other GFW data layers or statistics. Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA tree cover gain is displayed with a set minimum TCC density greater than 50%.</p>
            <p>This feature is also available for the map visualization, analysis, and for individual country profiles. The TCC density minimum selected for the overview graphs and rankings will not be applied automatically to other areas of the website.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </li>
  
negative.code:         <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover gain data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover and tree cover loss. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/6c9f379a362e4926ad24b58444f4ba67" target="_blank">Open Data Portal</a>.</p>
  
          <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
          
          <p class='credits'><strong>Citation:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” Science 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available online from: <a href='http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest' target='_blank'>http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest</a>.</p>
  
            <p class='credits'><strong>Suggested citations for data as displayed on GFW:</strong> Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA Tree Cover Gain, Country Rankings.” University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [date]. <a href='http://www.globalforestwatch.org/' target='_blank'>www.globalforestwatch.org</a>.</p>
  
            <p><em><a href='http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/6c9f379a362e4926ad24b58444f4ba67' target='_blank'>Learn more or download data</a>.</p></em>
        </div>
      </li>
  
  