anchor.diff:  
           <p>Use the toggle button above the figure to switch the figure and rankings between gross tree cover (hectares) and percent tree cover. Percent tree cover is relative to total global or country land area.</p>
   
  -        <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover data from the University of Maryland(UMD)/Google. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover loss and gain. Accordingly, current (or post-2000) tree cover cannot be determined by subtracting annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/7876b225f8034a0ebba79fad4afb80ad" target="_blank">data page</a>.</p>
  +        <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover loss and gain. Accordingly, current (or post-2000) tree cover cannot be determined by subtracting annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/7876b225f8034a0ebba79fad4afb80ad" target="_blank">data page</a>.</p>
   
           <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations.</p>
   
  
positive.code:       <div class='source_body'>
          <p><strong class='source_title'>Cover Loss relative to Cover Gain</strong></p>
  
          <p>The graph and rankings below were created using tree cover, loss, and gain data from the University of Maryland/Google. For more information on this dataset, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/93ecbfa0542c42fdaa8454fa42a6cc27" target="_blank"> data page</a>.</p>
  
          <p>This graph plots the ratio of tree cover loss (2001-2013) to gain (2001-2012) against tree cover in 2000. Points that fall above the dotted line (ratio = 1) represent countries that have more loss than gain between 2001 and 2012, whereas points that fall below the line represent the opposite -- countries that have more gain than loss within the same time period. The higher the point, the greater the ratio of tree cover loss to gain.</p>
  
  
negative.code: 
          <p>Use the toggle button above the figure to switch the figure and rankings between gross tree cover gain (hectares) and percent tree cover gain. Percent gain is always relative to tree cover (either global or by country) in 2000.</p>
  
          <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover gain data from Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover and tree cover loss. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="http://data.globalforestwatch.org/datasets/6c9f379a362e4926ad24b58444f4ba67" target="_blank">data page</a>.</p>
  
          <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
        </div>
  