anchor.diff:  
               <li><p><strong>Intact Forest Landscapes vs. tree cover extent:</strong> These data sets measure different things. Tree cover extent shows all 30 x 30 meter areas that meet a minimum threshold of tree cover (25% canopy cover), whereas Intact Forest Landscapes only show forests that show no significant signs of human activity (see the <%= link_to 'Data page', "#{sources_path}#forest_cover" %> for specifics).</p>
   
  -            <p>Users may find instances where tree cover extent does not fall within the boundaries of Intact Forest Landscapes. This is because the Intact Forest Landscapes layer is based on MODIS (250 meter resolution satellite imagery), which is known to overestimate low tree cover densities, whereas the tree cover extent layer is based on Landsat (30 meter resolution satellite imagery).  As a result, the tree cover extent layer may not show tree cover in an area that is covered by an intact forest landscape polygon.</p></li>
  +            <p>Users may find instances where tree cover extent does not fall within the boundaries of intact forest landscapes. This is because the Intact Forest Landscapes layer is based on MODIS (250 meter resolution satellite imagery), which is known to overestimate low tree cover densities, whereas the tree cover extent layer is based on Landsat (30 meter resolution satellite imagery). As a result, the tree cover extent layer may not show tree cover in an area that is covered by an intact forest landscape polygon.</p></li>
             </ul>
   
             <h3 class='overview_title'>I am familiar with a particular geographic area and believe your data set is inaccurate. What can I do?</h3>
  
positive.code: 
            <ul clasS='bullets'>
              <li><strong>Forest change data</strong>, such as global forest change data from the University of Maryland, near real-time FORMA alerts for the humid tropics, SAD alerts for the Brazilian Amazon from Imazon, quarterly vegetation change data from NASA, and others</li>
              <li><strong>Forest cover data</strong>, including the extent of tree cover in 2000, Intact Forest Landscapes, and pantropical carbon density</li>
              <li><strong>Forest use data</strong>, which includes contextual information, such as concession areas for natural resource extraction or agricultural production</li>
              <li><strong>Conservation data</strong>, such as global boundaries for protected areas and biodiversity hotspots</li>
              <li><strong>Qualitative and anecdotal data</strong>, such as user-submitted stories (submit one <%= link_to 'here', new_story_path %>)</li>
  
negative.code: 
            <p>Over the coming year, GFW will develop these features together with a core group of corporate partners committed to supply chain transparency and ending commodity-driven deforestation. We’ll also establish a working group of interested companies we’ll invite to test the site as it is developed and provide feedback.</p>
  
            <p>For more information or to join the conversation, contact: <strong>Elizabeth Baer</strong>, <em>Corporate Engagement Manager for Global Forest Watch, World Resources Institute</em> (<a href='mailto:ebaer@wri.org'>ebaer@wri.org</a>).</p>
  
            <p>You can download a copy of GFW’s corporate partnerships policy here <em>(coming soon)</em>.</p>
          </div>
  