anchor.diff:          </ul>
   
           <p>The rankings below list climate domains from greatest to least tree cover loss for the period of 2001-2013.</p>
  +        
  +        <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover loss data from the University of Maryland(UMD)/Google. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover extent and gain. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="/sources/forest_change?t=umd_tree_loss_gain" target="_blank"> data page</a>.</p>
  +
  +        <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, loss of tree cover may occur for many reasons, including deforestation, fire, and logging within the course of sustainable forestry operations. Similarly, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
   
         </div>
       </li>
  
positive.code:       <div class='source_body'>
          <p><strong class='source_title'>CLIMATE DOMAIN</strong></p>
  
          <p>The infographic and rankings below were created using tree cover loss data from the University of Maryland(UMD)/Google. For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="/sources/forest_change?t=umd_tree_loss_gain" target="_blank"> data page</a>.</p>
  
          <p>The infographic displays total tree cover loss per year by climate domain from 2001-2013, with loss represented by bubble size (e.g., domains with greater tree cover loss are represented by larger bubbles).</p>
  
  
negative.code:     <li id='total_loss'>
        <div class='source_body'>
          <p><strong class='source_title'>TREE COVER LOSS</strong></p>
          
  
          <p>The graph displays global tree cover loss per year from 2001 through 2013 in hectares.</p>
  
          <p>The rankings list countries from greatest to least tree cover loss from 2001 through 2013. The infographics located within the rankings highlight the trend of tree cover loss.</p>
          
          <p>The graph and rankings visualize tree cover loss data from the University of Maryland(UMD)/Google. Due to variation in research methodology and/or date of content, this data cannot be compared accurately against tree cover extent and gain. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting tree cover gain from tree cover loss, and current (or post-2000) tree cover extent cannot be determined by subtracting annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover extent.  For more information on this data set, please visit the <a href="/sources/forest_change?t=umd_tree_loss_gain" target="_blank"> data page</a>.</p>
  
          <p>Please also note that “tree cover” does not equate to “forest cover.” “Tree cover” refers to the biophysical presence of trees, which may be a part of natural forests or tree plantations. Thus, loss of tree cover may occur for many reasons, including deforestation, fire, and logging within the course of sustainable forestry operations. Similarly, tree cover gain may indicate the growth of tree canopy within natural or managed forests.</p>
        </div>
      </li>
  
  