anchor.diff:                      <p>GFW seeks to bring together the most current, reliable, and robust data to monitor forest change around the world. GFW incorporates and integrates a wide range of data sets that can be overlaid and compared, including:</p>
   
                       <ul clasS='bullets'>
  -                      <li><strong>Forest change data</strong>, such as global tree cover loss and gain data from the University of Maryland/Google, near real-time FORMA alerts for the humid tropics, SAD alerts for the Brazilian Amazon from Imazon, quarterly vegetation change data from NASA, and others</li>
  -                      <li><strong>Forest cover data</strong>, including global tree cover extent data, intact forest landscapes, and pantropical carbon density</li>
  -                      <li><strong>Forest fire data</strong>, from NASA’s Modis satellite (see <a href='http://www.fires.globalforestwatch.org' target='_blank'>GFW Fires</a>)</li>
  -                      <li><strong>Forest use data</strong>, which includes contextual information, such as concession areas for natural resource extraction or agricultural production</li>
  -                      <li><strong>Conservation data</strong>, such as global boundaries for protected areas and biodiversity hotspots</li>
  -                      <li><strong>Qualitative and anecdotal data</strong>, such as user-submitted stories (submit one <%= link_to 'here', new_story_path %>)</li>
  -                      <li><strong>People data</strong>, including community land boundaries and land tenure rights (coming soon)</li>
  +                      <li>Forest change data, such as global tree cover loss and gain data from the University of Maryland/Google, near real-time FORMA alerts for the humid tropics, SAD alerts for the Brazilian Amazon from Imazon, quarterly vegetation change data from NASA, and others</li>
  +                      <li>Forest cover data, including global tree cover extent data, intact forest landscapes, and pantropical carbon density</li>
  +                      <li>Forest fire data, from NASA’s Modis satellite (see <a href='http://www.fires.globalforestwatch.org' target='_blank'>GFW Fires</a>)</li>
  +                      <li>Forest use data, which includes contextual information, such as concession areas for natural resource extraction or agricultural production</li>
  +                      <li>Conservation data, such as global boundaries for protected areas and biodiversity hotspots</li>
  +                      <li>Qualitative and anecdotal data, such as user-submitted (submit one <%= link_to 'here', new_story_path %>)</li>
  +                      <li>People data, including community land boundaries and land tenure rights (coming soon)</li>
                       </ul>
   
                       <p>By monitoring changes tracked by these data sets over time, users can better understand drivers and patterns of forest loss worldwide.</p>
  
positive.code:                     <p>Different data sets measure different things and are derived using different methodologies. Such differences can lead to results that may manifest as contradictory layers on the GFW platform. In some cases, a lack of available high-quality data may cause a greater margin of error for certain data sets.</p>
  
                      <ul class='bullets'>
                        <li><p><strong>Intact Forest Landscapes vs. tree cover extent:</strong> These data sets measure different things. Tree cover extent shows all 30 x 30 meter areas that meet a minimum threshold of tree cover (25% canopy cover), whereas Intact Forest Landscapes only show forests that show no significant signs of human activity (see the <%= link_to 'Data page', "#{sources_path}#forest_cover" %> for specifics).</p>
  
                        <p>Users may find instances where tree cover extent does not fall within the boundaries of intact forest landscapes. This is because the Intact Forest Landscapes layer is based on MODIS (250 meter resolution satellite imagery), which is known to overestimate low tree cover densities, whereas the tree cover extent layer is based on Landsat (30 meter resolution satellite imagery). As a result, the tree cover extent layer may not show tree cover in an area that is covered by an intact forest landscape polygon.</p></li>
                      </ul>
  
negative.code:                     <p>GFW aims to radically improve the availability, quality, and accessibility of forest data for everyone:</p>
                      <ul class='bullets'>
                        <li><strong>Governments</strong> can use GFW to detect illegal forest clearing and target forest law enforcement efforts.</li>
                        <li><strong>Companies</strong> •	Companies can monitor the impacts of commodity supply chains on forests and demonstrate compliance with sustainability commitments and certifications. Learn more at <a href='http://www.commodities.globalforestwatch.org' target='_blank'>GFW Commodities</a>.</li>
                        <li><strong>NGOs & civil society</strong> can identify deforestation hotspots and bolster their investigations, advocacy, and campaigns.</li>
                        <li><strong>Indigenous communities</strong> can monitor their territories and raise an alarm when their customary forests are threatened.</li>
                        <li><strong>Media</strong> can gather evidence, data, and graphics for reporting.</li>
  