anchor.diff:  
   handle_call(_Call, _From, #ch_mgr{init_finished=false} = S) ->
       {reply, not_initialized, S};
  -handle_call({calculate_projection_internal_old}, _From, #ch_mgr{myflu=MyFLU}=S) ->
  +handle_call({calculate_projection_internal_old}, _From,
  +            #ch_mgr{myflu=MyFLU}=S) ->
       RelativeToServer = MyFLU,
       {Reply, S2} = calc_projection(S, RelativeToServer, [{author_proc, call}]),
       {reply, Reply, S2};
  
positive.code:                     RelativeToServer, Dbg, S).
  
  %% OldThreshold: Percent chance of using the old/previous network partition list
  %% NoPartitionThreshold: If the network partition changes, what are the odds
  %%                       that there are no partitions at all?
  
  calc_projection(_OldThreshold, _NoPartitionThreshold, LastProj,
  
negative.code: 
          %% A40a (see flowchart)
          Rank_newprop > Rank_latest ->
              ?REACT({a40, ?LINE}),
  
              %% TODO: There may be an "improvement" here.  If we're the
              %% highest-ranking FLU in the all_members list, then if we make a
              %% projection where our UPI list is the same as P_latest's, and
              %% our repairing list is the same as P_latest's, then it may not
              %% be necessary to write our projection: it doesn't "improve"
              %% anything UPI-wise or repairing-wise.  But it isn't clear to me
              %% if it's 100% correct to "improve" here and skip writing
              %% P_newprop, yet.
              react_to_env_C300(P_newprop, P_latest, S);
  
          %% A40b (see flowchart)
  