anchor.diff:  	    %% User has exactly one binding in the location database matching this one, do some checking
   	    check_same_call_id(RegReq, Contact, DBLocation)
       end,
  -    process_non_wildcard_contacts2(RegReq, T);
  +    %% Remove any entrys byte-by-byte identical to Contact from T
  +    NewT = T -- [Contact],
  +    process_non_wildcard_contacts2(RegReq, NewT);
   process_non_wildcard_contacts2(_RegReq, []) ->
       ok.
   
  
positive.code:                      ]}} = process_updates(PU_RegReq29, PU_Contacts28),
  
  
      %% and test non-Outbound client registering when there are Outbound entrys involved -
      %% can't have same Contact URI as the Outbound registrations though. Bug in draft? Naah.
  
  
  
negative.code:     autotest:mark(?LINE, "process_updates/2 - 50"),
      %% test wildcard with invalid expires, actually testing that siperrors thrown deep
      %% down are handled correctly (we've had bugs in that handling, turning 400 into 500)
  
      PU_Contacts50 = contact:parse(["*"]),
      PU_Header50_1 = keylist:set("CSeq", ["5001 REGISTER"], PU_RegReq1#reg_request.header),
      PU_Header50 = keylist:set("Expires", ["1"], PU_Header50_1),
      PU_RegReq50 = PU_RegReq1#reg_request{header	= PU_Header50
  					},
      {siperror, 400, "Wildcard with non-zero contact expires parameter"} =
  	process_updates(PU_RegReq50, PU_Contacts50),
  
      autotest:mark(?LINE, "process_updates/2 - 51"),
      %% Test REGISTER with multiple identical contacs to make sure we don't fail because the
      %% second one has same Call-Id and CSeq as the first one. Corner case not covered by
      %% RFC3261, but actually happened (because of bug in other implementation) at SIPit 18.
      PU_Contact51Str = "<sip:user@example.net>",
      PU_Contacts51 = contact:parse([PU_Contact51Str, PU_Contact51Str]),
      PU_Header51_1 = keylist:set("CSeq", ["5101 REGISTER"], PU_RegReq1#reg_request.header),
      PU_Header51 = keylist:set("Expires", ["20"], PU_Header51_1),
      PU_RegReq51 = PU_RegReq1#reg_request{header	 = PU_Header51,
  					 sipuser = TestUser2
  					},
      {ok, {200, "OK", [{"Contact",       PU_Contacts51_CRes},
                        {"Date",          _},
  		      {"Supported",	["outbound"]}
                       ]}} = process_updates(PU_RegReq51, PU_Contacts51),
  
      autotest:mark(?LINE, "process_updates/2 - 51.1"),
      %% verify the contacts in the response
      ok = test_verify_contacts(15, 20, [PU_Contact51Str], PU_Contacts51_CRes),
  
      mnesia:abort(ok).
  
  
  