doi
stringlengths 9
10
| chunk-id
stringlengths 1
4
| chunk
stringlengths 1
1.57k
| id
stringlengths 9
10
| title
stringlengths 10
127
| summary
stringlengths 581
1.92k
| source
stringlengths 30
31
| authors
sequence | categories
sequence | comment
stringclasses 28
values | journal_ref
stringclasses 1
value | primary_category
stringclasses 6
values | published
stringlengths 8
8
| updated
stringlengths 8
8
| references
list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005.14165 | 169 | the ground truth datasets in this section, and no samples from GPT-3 are included here.
Context!Article:
Informal conversation is an important part of any business
relationship.Before you start a discussion,however,make sure you understand
which topics are suitable and which are considered taboo in a particular
culture. Latin Americans enjoy sharing information about their local
history, art and customs.You may expect questions about your family,and
be sure to show pictures of your children.You may feel free to ask similar
questions of your Latin American friends.The French think of conversation
as an art form,and they enjoy the value of lively discussions as well as
disagreements. For them,arguments can be interesting and they can cover
pretty much or any topic ---- as long as they occur in are respectful and
intelligent manner.
In the United States,business people like to discuss a wide range of
topics,including opinions about work,family,hobbies,and politics. In
Japan,China,and Korea,however,people are much more private.They do not
share much about their thoughts,feelings,or emotions because they feel
that doing so might take away from the harmonious business relationship
they're trying to build.Middle Easterners are also private about their
personal lives and family matters.It is considered rude,for example,to ask | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 170 | they're trying to build.Middle Easterners are also private about their
personal lives and family matters.It is considered rude,for example,to ask
a businessman from Saudi Arabia about his wife or children.
As a general rule,it's best not to talk about politics or religion with
your business friends.This can get you into trouble,even in the United
States,where people hold different religious views.In addition,discussing
one's salary is usually considered unsuitable.Sports is typically a
friendly subject in most parts of the world,although be careful not to
criticize national sport.Instead,be friendly and praise your host's team.
Q: What shouldn't you do when talking about sports with colleagues from
another country?
A: Criticizing the sports of your colleagues' country.
Q: Which is typically a friendly topic in most places according to the
author?
A: Sports.
Q: Why are people from Asia more private in their conversation with others?
A: They don't want to have their good relationship with others harmed by
informal conversation.
Q: The author considers politics and religion .
A:
Correct Answer !taboo
Incorrect Answer !cheerful topics
Incorrect Answer !rude topics
Incorrect Answer !topics that can never be talked about | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 171 | A:
Correct Answer !taboo
Incorrect Answer !cheerful topics
Incorrect Answer !rude topics
Incorrect Answer !topics that can never be talked about
Figure G.1: Formatted dataset example for RACE-h. When predicting, we normalize by the unconditional probability
of each answer as described in 2.
50
Context!anli 2: anli 2: The Gold Coast Hotel & Casino is a hotel and casino
located in Paradise, Nevada. This locals' casino is owned and operated
by Boyd Gaming. The Gold Coast is located one mile ( 1:6km) west of the
Las Vegas Strip on West Flamingo Road. It is located across the street
from the Palms Casino Resort and the Rio All Suite Hotel and Casino.
Question: The Gold Coast is a budget-friendly casino. True, False, or
Neither?
Correct Answer !Neither
Incorrect Answer !True
Incorrect Answer !False
Figure G.2: Formatted dataset example for ANLI R2
Context!Article:
Mrs. Smith is an unusual teacher. Once she told each student to bring
along a few potatoes in plastic bag. On each potato the students had to
write a name of a person that they hated And the next day, every child
brought some potatoes. Some had two potatoes;some three;some up to five. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 172 | write a name of a person that they hated And the next day, every child
brought some potatoes. Some had two potatoes;some three;some up to five.
Mrs. Smith then told the children to carry the bags everywhere they went,
even to the toilet, for two weeks. As day after day passed, the children
started to complain about the awful smell of the rotten potatoes.
Those children who brought five potatoes began to feel the weight trouble
of the bags. After two weeks, the children were happy to hear that the
game was finally ended. Mrs. Smith asked,"How did you feel while carrying
the potatoes for two weeks?" The children started complaining about the
trouble loudly.
Then Mrs. Smith told them why she asked them to play the game. She
said,"This is exactly the situation when you carry your hatred for somebody
inside your heart. The terrible smell of the hatred will pollute your
heart and you will carry something unnecessary with you all the time. If
you cannot stand the smell of the rotten potatoes for just two weeks, can
you imagine how heavy it would be to have the hatred in your heart for your
lifetime? So throw away any hatred from your heart, and you'll be really
happy."
Q: Which of the following is True according to the passage?
A: If a kid hated four people,he or she had to carry four potatoes. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 173 | happy."
Q: Which of the following is True according to the passage?
A: If a kid hated four people,he or she had to carry four potatoes.
Q: We can learn from the passage that we should .
A: throw away the hatred inside
Q: The children complained about besides the weight trouble.
A: the smell
Q: Mrs.Smith asked her students to write on the potatoes.
A:
Correct Answer !names
Incorrect Answer !numbers
Incorrect Answer !time
Incorrect Answer !places
Figure G.3: Formatted dataset example for RACE-m. When predicting, we normalize by the unconditional probability
of each answer as described in 2.
51
Context!How to apply sealant to wood.
Correct Answer !Using a brush, brush on sealant onto wood until it is fully saturated with
the sealant.
Incorrect Answer !Using a brush, drip on sealant onto wood until it is fully saturated with
the sealant.
Figure G.4: Formatted dataset example for PIQA
Context!My body cast a shadow over the grass because
Correct Answer !the sun was rising.
Incorrect Answer !the grass was cut.
Figure G.5: Formatted dataset example for COPA
Context!(CNN) Yuval Rabin, whose father, Yitzhak Rabin, was assassinated while | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 174 | Figure G.5: Formatted dataset example for COPA
Context!(CNN) Yuval Rabin, whose father, Yitzhak Rabin, was assassinated while
serving as Prime Minister of Israel, criticized Donald Trump for appealing
to "Second Amendment people" in a speech and warned that the words that
politicians use can incite violence and undermine democracy. "Trump's
words are an incitement to the type of political violence that touched
me personally," Rabin wrote in USAToday. He said that Trump's appeal to
"Second Amendment people" to stop Hillary Clinton -- comments that were
criticized as a call for violence against Clinton, something Trump denied
-- "were a new level of ugliness in an ugly campaign season."
- The son of a former Israeli Prime Minister who was assassinated wrote an
op ed about the consequence of violent political rhetoric.
- Warns of "parallels" between Israel of the 1990s and the U.S. today.
Correct Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned Donald Trump's
aggressive rhetoric.
Correct Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned Trump's aggressive
rhetoric. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 175 | Correct Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned Trump's aggressive
rhetoric.
Incorrect Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned Hillary Clinton's
aggressive rhetoric.
Incorrect Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned U.S.'s aggressive
rhetoric.
Incorrect Answer !- Referencing his father, who was shot and killed by an extremist amid
political tension in Israel in 1995, Rabin condemned Yitzhak Rabin's
aggressive rhetoric.
Figure G.6: Formatted dataset example for ReCoRD. We consider the context above to be a single ”problem” because
this is how the task is presented in the ReCoRD dataset and scored in the ReCoRD evaluation script.
Context!anli 1: anli 1: Fulton James MacGregor MSP is a Scottish politician
who is a Scottish National Party (SNP) Member of Scottish Parliament
for the constituency of Coatbridge and Chryston. MacGregor is currently
Parliamentary Liaison Officer to Shona Robison, Cabinet Secretary for | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 176 | for the constituency of Coatbridge and Chryston. MacGregor is currently
Parliamentary Liaison Officer to Shona Robison, Cabinet Secretary for
Health & Sport. He also serves on the Justice and Education & Skills
committees in the Scottish Parliament.
Question: Fulton James MacGregor is a Scottish politican who is a Liaison
officer to Shona Robison who he swears is his best friend. True, False, or
Neither?
Correct Answer !Neither
Incorrect Answer !True
Incorrect Answer !False
Figure G.7: Formatted dataset example for ANLI R1
52
Context!Organisms require energy in order to do what?
Correct Answer !mature and develop.
Incorrect Answer !rest soundly.
Incorrect Answer !absorb light.
Incorrect Answer !take in nutrients.
Figure G.8: Formatted dataset example for OpenBookQA. When predicting, we normalize by the unconditional
probability of each answer as described in 2.
Context!Making a cake: Several cake pops are shown on a display. A woman and girl
are shown making the cake pops in a kitchen. They
Correct Answer !bake them, then frost and decorate.
Incorrect Answer !taste them as they place them on plates.
Incorrect Answer !put the frosting on the cake as they pan it. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 177 | Incorrect Answer !taste them as they place them on plates.
Incorrect Answer !put the frosting on the cake as they pan it.
Incorrect Answer !come out and begin decorating the cake as well.
Figure G.9: Formatted dataset example for HellaSwag
Context!anli 3: anli 3: We shut the loophole which has American workers actually
subsidizing the loss of their own job. They just passed an expansion of
that loophole in the last few days: $43 billion of giveaways, including
favors to the oil and gas industry and the people importing ceiling fans
from China.
Question: The loophole is now gone True, False, or Neither?
Correct Answer !False
Incorrect Answer !True
Incorrect Answer !Neither
Figure G.10: Formatted dataset example for ANLI R3
Context!Question: George wants to warm his hands quickly by rubbing them. Which
skin surface will produce the most heat?
Answer:
Correct Answer !dry palms
Incorrect Answer !wet palms
Incorrect Answer !palms covered with oil
Incorrect Answer !palms covered with lotion
Figure G.11: Formatted dataset example for ARC (Challenge). When predicting, we normalize by the unconditional
probability of each answer as described in 2.
Context!lull is to trust as | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 178 | probability of each answer as described in 2.
Context!lull is to trust as
Correct Answer !cajole is to compliance
Incorrect Answer !balk is to fortitude
Incorrect Answer !betray is to loyalty
Incorrect Answer !hinder is to destination
Incorrect Answer !soothe is to passion
Figure G.12: Formatted dataset example for SAT Analogies
Correct Context !Grace was happy to trade me her sweater for my jacket. She thinks the
sweater
Incorrect Context !Grace was happy to trade me her sweater for my jacket. She thinks the
jacket
Target Completion !looks dowdy on her.
Figure G.13: Formatted dataset example for Winograd. The ‘partial’ evaluation method we use compares the probability
of the completion given a correct and incorrect context.
53
Correct Context !Johnny likes fruits more than vegetables in his new keto diet because the
fruits
Incorrect Context !Johnny likes fruits more than vegetables in his new keto diet because the
vegetables
Target Completion !are saccharine.
Figure G.14: Formatted dataset example for Winogrande. The ‘partial’ evaluation method we use compares the
probability of the completion given a correct and incorrect context.
Context!READING COMPREHENSION ANSWER KEY | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 179 | probability of the completion given a correct and incorrect context.
Context!READING COMPREHENSION ANSWER KEY
While this process moved along, diplomacy continued its rounds. Direct
pressure on the Taliban had proved unsuccessful. As one NSC staff note
put it, "Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is not so much a state sponsor
of terrorism as it is a state sponsored by terrorists." In early 2000,
the United States began a high-level effort to persuade Pakistan to use
its influence over the Taliban. In January 2000, Assistant Secretary
of State Karl Inderfurth and the State Department's counterterrorism
coordinator, Michael Sheehan, met with General Musharraf in Islamabad,
dangling before him the possibility of a presidential visit in March as a
reward for Pakistani cooperation. Such a visit was coveted by Musharraf,
partly as a sign of his government's legitimacy. He told the two envoys
that he would meet with Mullah Omar and press him on Bin Laden. They
left, however, reporting to Washington that Pakistan was unlikely in fact
to do anything," given what it sees as the benefits of Taliban control
of Afghanistan." President Clinton was scheduled to travel to India.
The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also
visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in
the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 180 | The State Department felt that he should not visit India without also
visiting Pakistan. The Secret Service and the CIA, however, warned in
the strongest terms that visiting Pakistan would risk the President's
life. Counterterrorism officials also argued that Pakistan had not done
enough to merit a presidential visit. But President Clinton insisted
on including Pakistan in the itinerary for his trip to South Asia. His
one-day stopover on March 25, 2000, was the first time a U.S. president
had been there since 1969. At his meeting with Musharraf and others,
President Clinton concentrated on tensions between Pakistan and India
and the dangers of nuclear proliferation, but also discussed Bin Laden.
President Clinton told us that when he pulled Musharraf aside for a brief,
one-on-one meeting, he pleaded with the general for help regarding Bin
Laden." I offered him the moon when I went to see him, in terms of better
relations with the United States, if he'd help us get Bin Laden and deal
with another issue or two." The U.S. effort continued.
Who did The State Department feel should visit both India and Pakistan?
Correct Answer !- [False] Bin Laden
Incorrect Answer !- [True] Bin Laden
Figure G.15: Formatted dataset example for MultiRC. There are three levels within MultiRC: (1) the passage, (2) the | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 181 | Figure G.15: Formatted dataset example for MultiRC. There are three levels within MultiRC: (1) the passage, (2) the
questions, and (3) the answers. During evaluation, accuracy is determined at the per-question level, with a question
being considered correct if and only if all the answers within the question are labeled correctly. For this reason, we use
Kto refer to the number of questions shown within the context.
Context!Question: Which factor will most likely cause a person to develop a fever?
Answer:
Correct Answer !a bacterial population in the bloodstream
Incorrect Answer !a leg muscle relaxing after exercise
Incorrect Answer !several viral particles on the skin
Incorrect Answer !carbohydrates being digested in the stomach
Figure G.16: Formatted dataset example for ARC (Easy). When predicting, we normalize by the unconditional
probability of each answer as described in 2.
54
Context!Bob went to the gas station to fill up his car. His tank was completely
empty and so was his wallet. The cashier offered to pay for his gas if he
came back later to pay. Bob felt grateful as he drove home.
Correct Answer !Bob believed that there were good people in the world.
Incorrect Answer !Bob contemplated how unfriendly the world was. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 182 | Correct Answer !Bob believed that there were good people in the world.
Incorrect Answer !Bob contemplated how unfriendly the world was.
Figure G.17: Formatted dataset example for StoryCloze
Context!Helsinki is the capital and largest city of Finland. It is in the region
of Uusimaa, in southern Finland, on the shore of the Gulf of Finland.
Helsinki has a population of , an urban population of , and a metropolitan
population of over 1.4 million, making it the most populous municipality
and urban area in Finland. Helsinki is some north of Tallinn, Estonia,
east of Stockholm, Sweden, and west of Saint Petersburg, Russia. Helsinki
has close historical connections with these three cities.
The Helsinki metropolitan area includes the urban core of Helsinki, Espoo,
Vantaa, Kauniainen, and surrounding commuter towns. It is the world's
northernmost metro area of over one million people, and the city is the
northernmost capital of an EU member state. The Helsinki metropolitan
area is the third largest metropolitan area in the Nordic countries
after Stockholm and Copenhagen, and the City of Helsinki is the third
largest after Stockholm and Oslo. Helsinki is Finland's major political,
educational, financial, cultural, and research center as well as one of
northern Europe's major cities. Approximately 75% of foreign companies | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 183 | educational, financial, cultural, and research center as well as one of
northern Europe's major cities. Approximately 75% of foreign companies
that operate in Finland have settled in the Helsinki region. The nearby
municipality of Vantaa is the location of Helsinki Airport, with frequent
service to various destinations in Europe and Asia.
Q: what is the most populous municipality in Finland?
A: Helsinki
Q: how many people live there?
A: 1.4 million in the metropolitan area
Q: what percent of the foreign companies that operate in Finland are in
Helsinki?
A: 75%
Q: what towns are a part of the metropolitan area?
A:
Target Completion !Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa, Kauniainen, and surrounding commuter towns
Figure G.18: Formatted dataset example for CoQA
Context!Please unscramble the letters into a word, and write that word:
asinoc =
Target Completion !casino
Figure G.19: Formatted dataset example for Cycled Letters
55
Context!Passage: Saint Jean de Br ebeuf was a French Jesuit missionary who
travelled to New France in 1625. There he worked primarily with the Huron
for the rest of his life, except for a few years in France from 1629 to | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 184 | travelled to New France in 1625. There he worked primarily with the Huron
for the rest of his life, except for a few years in France from 1629 to
1633. He learned their language and culture, writing extensively about
each to aid other missionaries. In 1649, Br ebeuf and another missionary
were captured when an Iroquois raid took over a Huron village . Together
with Huron captives, the missionaries were ritually tortured and killed
on March 16, 1649. Br ebeuf was beatified in 1925 and among eight Jesuit
missionaries canonized as saints in the Roman Catholic Church in 1930.
Question: How many years did Saint Jean de Br ebeuf stay in New France
before he went back to France for a few years?
Answer:
Target Completion !4
Figure G.20: Formatted dataset example for DROP
Context!Fill in blank:
She held the torch in front of her.
She caught her breath.
"Chris? There's a step."
"What?"
"A step. Cut in the rock. About fifty feet ahead." She moved faster.
They both moved faster. "In fact," she said, raising the torch higher,
"there's more than a . ->
Target Completion !step
Figure G.21: Formatted dataset example for LAMBADA | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 185 | "there's more than a . ->
Target Completion !step
Figure G.21: Formatted dataset example for LAMBADA
Context!Please unscramble the letters into a word, and write that word:
skicts =
Target Completion !sticks
Figure G.22: Formatted dataset example for Anagrams 1 (A1)
Context!Please unscramble the letters into a word, and write that word:
volwskagen =
Target Completion !volkswagen
Figure G.23: Formatted dataset example for Anagrams 2
Context!Q: Who played tess on touched by an angel?
A:
Target Completion !Delloreese Patricia Early (July 6, 1931 { November 19, 2017), known
professionally as Della Reese
Figure G.24: Formatted dataset example for Natural Questions
56
Context!TITLE: William Perry (American football) - Professional career
PARAGRAPH: In 1985, he was selected in the first round of the 1985 NFL
Draft by the Chicago Bears; he had been hand-picked by coach Mike Ditka.
However, defensive coordinator Buddy Ryan, who had a highly acrimonious
relationship with Ditka, called Perry a "wasted draft-pick". Perry
soon became a pawn in the political power struggle between Ditka and | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 186 | relationship with Ditka, called Perry a "wasted draft-pick". Perry
soon became a pawn in the political power struggle between Ditka and
Ryan. Perry's "Refrigerator" nickname followed him into the NFL and he
quickly became a favorite of the Chicago Bears fans. Teammates called
him "Biscuit," as in "one biscuit shy of 350 pounds." While Ryan refused
to play Perry, Ditka decided to use Perry as a fullback when the team was
near the opponents' goal line or in fourth and short situations, either
as a ball carrier or a lead blocker for star running back Walter Payton.
Ditka stated the inspiration for using Perry as a fullback came to him
during five-yard sprint exercises. During his rookie season, Perry
rushed for two touchdowns and caught a pass for one. Perry even had
the opportunity to run the ball during Super Bowl XX, as a nod to his
popularity and contributions to the team's success. The first time he
got the ball, he was tackled for a one-yard loss while attempting to throw
his first NFL pass on a halfback option play. The second time he got the
ball, he scored a touchdown (running over Patriots linebacker Larry McGrew
in the process). About halfway through his rookie season, Ryan finally
began to play Perry, who soon proved that he was a capable defensive | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 187 | in the process). About halfway through his rookie season, Ryan finally
began to play Perry, who soon proved that he was a capable defensive
lineman. His Super Bowl ring size is the largest of any professional
football player in the history of the event. His ring size is 25, while
the ring size for the average adult male is between 10 and 12. Perry went
on to play for ten years in the NFL, retiring after the 1994 season. In
his ten years as a pro, he regularly struggled with his weight, which
hampered his performance at times. He played in 138 games, recording
29.5 sacks and five fumble recoveries, which he returned for a total of
71 yards. In his offensive career he ran five yards for two touchdowns,
and had one reception for another touchdown. Perry later attempted a
comeback, playing an unremarkable 1996 season with the London Monarchs of
the World League of American Football (later NFL Europa).
Q: what team did he play for?
A:
Target Completion !the Chicago Bears
Figure G.25: Formatted dataset example for QuAC
Context!Please unscramble the letters into a word, and write that word:
r e!c.i p r o.c a/l =
Target Completion !reciprocal
Figure G.26: Formatted dataset example for Symbol Insertion | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 188 | r e!c.i p r o.c a/l =
Target Completion !reciprocal
Figure G.26: Formatted dataset example for Symbol Insertion
Context!Please unscramble the letters into a word, and write that word:
taefed =
Target Completion !defeat
Figure G.27: Formatted dataset example for Reversed Words
57
Context!Title: The Blitz
Background: From the German point of view, March 1941 saw an improvement.
The Luftwaffe flew 4,000 sorties that month, including 12 major and
three heavy attacks. The electronic war intensified but the Luftwaffe
flew major inland missions only on moonlit nights. Ports were easier to
find and made better targets. To confuse the British, radio silence was
observed until the bombs fell. X- and Y-Ger at beams were placed over
false targets and switched only at the last minute. Rapid frequency
changes were introduced for X-Ger at, whose wider band of frequencies and
greater tactical flexibility ensured it remained effective at a time when
British selective jamming was degrading the effectiveness of Y-Ger at.
Q: How many sorties were flown in March 1941?
A: 4,000
Q: When did the Luftwaffe fly inland missions?
A:
Target Completion !only on moonlit nights | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 189 | A: 4,000
Q: When did the Luftwaffe fly inland missions?
A:
Target Completion !only on moonlit nights
Figure G.28: Formatted dataset example for SQuADv2
Context!Normal force -- In a simple case such as an object resting upon a table,
the normal force on the object is equal but in opposite direction to the
gravitational force applied on the object (or the weight of the object),
that is, N = m g ( ndisplaystyle N=mg), where m is mass, and g is the
gravitational field strength (about 9.81 m/s on Earth). The normal force
here represents the force applied by the table against the object that
prevents it from sinking through the table and requires that the table is
sturdy enough to deliver this normal force without breaking. However, it
is easy to assume that the normal force and weight are action-reaction
force pairs (a common mistake). In this case, the normal force and
weight need to be equal in magnitude to explain why there is no upward
acceleration of the object. For example, a ball that bounces upwards
accelerates upwards because the normal force acting on the ball is larger
in magnitude than the weight of the ball.
question: is the normal force equal to the force of gravity?
answer:
Target Completion !yes | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 190 | in magnitude than the weight of the ball.
question: is the normal force equal to the force of gravity?
answer:
Target Completion !yes
Figure G.29: Formatted dataset example for BoolQ
Context!The trend toward lower rents may seem surprising given that some
communities in New York are bemoaning the loss of favorite local
businesses to high rents. But, despite the recent softening, for many
of these retailers there's still been too big a jump from the rental rates
of the late 1970s, when their leases were signed. Certainly, the recent
drop in prices doesn't mean Manhattan comes cheap.
question: Manhattan comes cheap. true, false, or neither?
answer:
Target Completion !false
Figure G.30: Formatted dataset example for CB
58
Context!The bet, which won him dinner for four, was regarding the existence and
mass of the top quark, an elementary particle discovered in 1995.
question: The Top Quark is the last of six flavors of quarks predicted by
the standard model theory of particle physics. True or False?
answer:
Target Completion !False
Figure G.31: Formatted dataset example for RTE
Context!An outfitter provided everything needed for the safari.
Before his first walking holiday, he went to a specialist outfitter to buy
some boots. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 191 | Context!An outfitter provided everything needed for the safari.
Before his first walking holiday, he went to a specialist outfitter to buy
some boots.
question: Is the word `outfitter' used in the same way in the two
sentences above?
answer:
Target Completion !no
Figure G.32: Formatted dataset example for WiC
Context!Final Exam with Answer Key
Instructions: Please carefully read the following passages. For each
passage, you must identify which noun the pronoun marked in *bold* refers
to.
=====
Passage: Mr. Moncrieff visited Chester's luxurious New York apartment,
thinking that it belonged to his son Edward. The result was that Mr.
Moncrieff has decided to cancel Edward's allowance on the ground that
he no longer requires *his* financial support.
Question: In the passage above, what does the pronoun "*his*" refer to?
Answer:
Target Completion !mr. moncrieff
Figure G.33: Formatted dataset example for WSC
Context!Q: `Nude Descending A Staircase' is perhaps the most famous painting by
which 20th century artist?
A:
Target Completion !MARCEL DUCHAMP
Target Completion !r mutt
Target Completion !duchamp | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 192 | which 20th century artist?
A:
Target Completion !MARCEL DUCHAMP
Target Completion !r mutt
Target Completion !duchamp
Target Completion !marcel duchamp
Target Completion !R.Mutt
Target Completion !Marcel duChamp
Target Completion !Henri-Robert-Marcel Duchamp
Target Completion !Marcel du Champ
Target Completion !henri robert marcel duchamp
Target Completion !Duchampian
Target Completion !Duchamp
Target Completion !duchampian
Target Completion !marcel du champ
Target Completion !Marcel Duchamp
Target Completion !MARCEL DUCHAMP
Figure G.34: Formatted dataset example for TriviaQA. TriviaQA allows for multiple valid completions.
59
Context!Q: What school did burne hogarth establish?
A:
Target Completion !School of Visual Arts
Figure G.35: Formatted dataset example for WebQA
Context!Keinesfalls d urfen diese f ur den kommerziellen Gebrauch verwendet werden.
=
Target Completion !In no case may they be used for commercial purposes. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 193 | =
Target Completion !In no case may they be used for commercial purposes.
Figure G.36: Formatted dataset example for De !En. This is the format for one- and few-shot learning, for this and
other langauge tasks, the format for zero-shot learning is “Q: What is the flanguagegtranslation offsentencegA:
ftranslationg.”
Context!In no case may they be used for commercial purposes. =
Target Completion !Keinesfalls d urfen diese f ur den kommerziellen Gebrauch verwendet werden.
Figure G.37: Formatted dataset example for En !De
Context!Analysis of instar distributions of larval I. verticalis collected from
a series of ponds also indicated that males were in more advanced instars
than females. =
Target Completion !L'analyse de la distribution de fr equence des stades larvaires d'I.
verticalis dans une s erie d' etangs a egalement d emontr e que les larves
m^ ales etaient a des stades plus avanc es que les larves femelles.
Figure G.38: Formatted dataset example for En !Fr | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 194 | Figure G.38: Formatted dataset example for En !Fr
Context!L'analyse de la distribution de fr equence des stades larvaires d'I.
verticalis dans une s erie d' etangs a egalement d emontr e que les larves
m^ ales etaient a des stades plus avanc es que les larves femelles. =
Target Completion !Analysis of instar distributions of larval I. verticalis collected from
a series of ponds also indicated that males were in more advanced instars
than females.
Figure G.39: Formatted dataset example for Fr !En
Context!The truth is that you want, at any price, and against the wishes of the
peoples of Europe, to continue the negotiations for Turkey's accession
to the European Union, despite Turkey's continuing refusal to recognise
Cyprus and despite the fact that the democratic reforms are at a
standstill. =
Target Completion !Adev arul este c a v a dorit i, cu orice pret si ^ mpotriva dorint ei
europenilor, s a continuat i negocierile de aderare a Turciei la Uniunea | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 195 | europenilor, s a continuat i negocierile de aderare a Turciei la Uniunea
European a, ^ n ciuda refuzului continuu al Turciei de a recunoa ste Ciprul
si ^ n ciuda faptului c a reformele democratice au ajuns ^ ntr-un punct mort.
Figure G.40: Formatted dataset example for En !Ro
60
Context!Adev arul este c a v a dorit i, cu orice pret si ^ mpotriva dorint ei
europenilor, s a continuat i negocierile de aderare a Turciei la Uniunea
European a, ^ n ciuda refuzului continuu al Turciei de a recunoa ste Ciprul
si ^ n ciuda faptului c a reformele democratice au ajuns ^ ntr-un punct mort.
=
Target Completion !The truth is that you want, at any price, and against the wishes of the
peoples of Europe, to continue the negotiations for Turkey's accession | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 196 | =
Target Completion !The truth is that you want, at any price, and against the wishes of the
peoples of Europe, to continue the negotiations for Turkey's accession
to the European Union, despite Turkey's continuing refusal to recognise
Cyprus and despite the fact that the democratic reforms are at a
standstill.
Figure G.41: Formatted dataset example for Ro !En
Context!Q: What is (2 * 4) * 6?
A:
Target Completion !48
Figure G.42: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 1DC
Context!Q: What is 17 minus 14?
A:
Target Completion !3
Figure G.43: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 2DContext!Q: What is 98 plus 45?
A:
Target Completion !143
Figure G.44: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 2D+
Context!Q: What is 95 times 45?
A:
Target Completion !4275
Figure G.45: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 2Dx
Context!Q: What is 509 minus 488?
A:
Target Completion !21
Figure G.46: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 3DContext!Q: What is 556 plus 497?
A:
Target Completion !1053 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 197 | Figure G.46: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 3DContext!Q: What is 556 plus 497?
A:
Target Completion !1053
Figure G.47: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 3D+
Context!Q: What is 6209 minus 3365?
A:
Target Completion !2844
Figure G.48: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 4D61
Context!Q: What is 9923 plus 617?
A:
Target Completion !10540
Figure G.49: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 4D+
Context!Q: What is 40649 minus 78746?
A:
Target Completion !-38097
Figure G.50: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 5D
Context!Q: What is 65360 plus 16204?
A:
Target Completion !81564
Figure G.51: Formatted dataset example for Arithmetic 5D+
62
H Results on All Tasks for All Model Sizes
Zero-Shot One-Shot Few-Shot
Name Metric SplitFine-tune
SOTA K Small Med Large XL 2.7B 6.7B 13B 175B Small Med Large XL 2.7B 6.7B 13B 175B Small Med Large XL 2.7B 6.7B 13B 175B175B | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 198 | (test server)
HellaSwag acc dev 85.6 20 33.7 43.6 51.0 54.7 62.8 67.4 70.9 78.9 33.0 42.9 50.5 53.5 61.9 66.5 70.0 78.1 33.5 43.1 51.3 54.9 62.9 67.3 71.3 79.3
LAMBADA acc test 68.0 15 42.7 54.3 60.4 63.6 67.1 70.3 72.5 76.2 22.0 47.1 52.6 58.3 61.1 65.4 69.0 72.5 22.0 40.4 63.2 57.0 78.1 79.1 81.3 86.4
LAMBADA ppl test 8.63 15 18.6 9.09 6.53 5.44 4.60 4.00 3.56 3.00 165.0 11.6 8.29 6.46 5.53 4.61 4.06 3.35 165.0 27.6 6.63 7.45 2.89 2.56 2.56 1.92 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 199 | StoryCloze acc test 91.8 70 63.3 68.5 72.4 73.4 77.2 77.7 79.5 83.2 62.3 68.7 72.3 74.2 77.3 78.7 79.7 84.7 62.3 70.2 73.9 76.1 80.2 81.2 83.0 87.7
NQs acc test 44.5 64 0.64 1.75 2.71 4.40 6.01 5.79 7.84 14.6 1.19 3.07 4.79 5.43 8.73 9.78 13.7 23.0 1.72 4.46 7.89 9.72 13.2 17.0 21.0 29.9
TriviaQA acc dev 68.0 64 4.15 7.61 14.0 19.7 31.3 38.7 41.8 64.3 4.19 12.9 20.5 26.5 35.9 44.4 51.3 68.0 6.96 16.3 26.5 32.1 42.3 51.6 57.5 71.2 71.2 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 200 | WebQs acc test 45.5 64 1.77 3.20 4.33 4.63 7.92 7.73 8.22 14.4 2.56 6.20 8.51 9.15 14.5 15.1 19.0 25.3 5.46 12.6 15.9 19.6 24.8 27.7 33.5 41.5
Ro!En 16 BLEU-mb test 39.9 64 2.08 2.71 3.09 3.15 16.3 8.34 20.2 19.9 0.55 15.4 23.0 26.3 30.6 33.2 35.6 38.6 1.25 20.7 25.8 29.2 33.1 34.8 37.0 39.5
Ro!En 16 BLEU-sb test 64 2.39 3.08 3.49 3.56 16.8 8.75 20.8 20.9 0.65 15.9 23.6 26.8 31.3 34.2 36.7 40.0 1.40 21.3 26.6 30.1 34.3 36.2 38.4 41.3 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 201 | En!Ro 16 BLEU-mb test 38.5 64 2.14 2.65 2.53 2.50 3.46 4.24 5.32 14.1 0.35 3.30 7.89 8.72 13.2 15.1 17.3 20.6 1.25 5.90 9.33 10.7 14.3 16.3 18.0 21.0
En!Ro 16 BLEU-sb test 64 2.61 3.11 3.07 3.09 4.26 5.31 6.43 18.0 0.55 3.90 9.15 10.3 15.7 18.2 20.8 24.9 1.64 7.40 10.9 12.9 17.2 19.6 21.8 25.8
Fr!En 14 BLEU-mb test 35.0 64 1.81 2.53 3.47 3.13 20.6 15.1 21.8 21.2 1.28 15.9 23.7 26.3 29.0 30.5 30.2 33.7 4.98 25.5 28.5 31.1 33.7 34.9 36.6 39.2 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 202 | Fr!En 14 BLEU-sb test 64 2.29 2.99 3.90 3.60 21.2 15.5 22.4 21.9 1.50 16.3 24.4 27.0 30.0 31.6 31.4 35.6 5.30 26.2 29.5 32.2 35.1 36.4 38.3 41.4
En!Fr 14 BLEU-mb test 45.6 64 1.74 2.16 2.73 2.15 15.1 8.82 12.0 25.2 0.49 8.00 14.8 15.9 20.3 23.3 24.9 28.3 4.08 14.5 19.3 21.5 24.9 27.3 29.5 32.6
En!Fr 14 BLEU-sb test 45.9 64 2.44 2.75 3.54 2.82 19.3 11.4 15.3 31.3 0.81 10.0 18.2 19.3 24.7 28.3 30.1 34.1 5.31 18.0 23.6 26.1 30.3 33.3 35.5 39.9 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 203 | De!En 16 BLEU-mb test 40.2 64 2.06 2.87 3.41 3.63 21.5 17.3 23.0 27.2 0.83 16.2 22.5 24.7 28.2 30.7 33.0 30.4 3.25 22.7 26.2 29.2 32.7 34.8 37.3 40.6
De!En 16 BLEU-sb test 64 2.39 3.27 3.85 4.04 22.5 18.2 24.4 28.6 0.93 17.1 23.4 25.8 29.2 31.9 34.5 32.1 3.60 23.8 27.5 30.5 34.1 36.5 39.1 43.0
En!De 16 BLEU-mb test 41.2 64 1.70 2.27 2.31 2.43 12.9 8.66 10.4 24.6 0.50 7.00 12.9 13.1 18.3 20.9 22.5 26.2 3.42 12.3 15.4 17.1 20.9 23.0 26.6 29.7 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 204 | En!De 16 BLEU-sb test 41.2 64 2.09 2.65 2.75 2.92 13.7 9.36 11.0 25.3 0.54 7.40 13.4 13.4 18.8 21.7 23.3 27.3 3.78 12.9 16.1 17.7 21.7 24.1 27.7 30.9
Winograd acc test 93.8 7 66.3 72.9 74.7 76.9 82.4 85.7 87.9 88.3 63.4 68.5 72.9 76.9 82.4 84.6 86.1 89.7 63.4 67.4 73.6 76.9 84.3 85.4 82.4 88.6
Winogrande acc dev 84.6 50 52.0 52.1 57.4 58.7 62.3 64.5 67.9 70.2 51.3 53.0 58.3 59.1 61.7 65.8 66.9 73.2 51.3 52.6 57.5 59.1 62.6 67.4 70.0 77.7 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 205 | PIQA acc dev 77.1 50 64.6 70.2 72.9 75.1 75.6 78.0 78.5 81.0 64.3 69.3 71.8 74.4 74.3 76.3 77.8 80.5 64.3 69.4 72.0 74.3 75.4 77.8 79.9 82.3 82.8
ARC (Challenge) acc test 78.5 50 26.6 29.5 31.8 35.5 38.0 41.4 43.7 51.4 25.5 30.2 31.6 36.4 38.4 41.5 43.1 53.2 25.5 28.4 32.3 36.7 39.5 43.7 44.8 51.5
ARC (Easy) acc test 92.0 50 43.6 46.5 53.0 53.8 58.2 60.2 63.8 68.8 42.7 48.2 54.6 55.9 60.3 62.6 66.8 71.2 42.7 51.0 58.1 59.1 62.1 65.8 69.1 70.1 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 206 | OpenBookQA acc test 87.2 100 35.6 43.2 45.2 46.8 53.0 50.4 55.6 57.6 37.0 39.8 46.2 46.4 53.4 53.0 55.8 58.8 37.0 43.6 48.0 50.6 55.6 55.2 60.8 65.4
Quac f1 dev 74.4 5 21.2 26.8 31.0 30.1 34.7 36.1 38.4 41.5 21.1 26.9 31.9 32.3 37.4 39.0 40.6 43.4 21.6 27.6 32.9 34.2 38.2 39.9 40.9 44.3
RACE-h acc test 90.0 10 35.2 37.9 40.1 40.9 42.4 44.1 44.6 45.5 34.3 37.7 40.0 42.0 43.8 44.3 44.6 45.9 34.3 37.0 40.4 41.4 42.3 44.7 45.1 46.8 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 207 | RACE-m acc test 93.1 10 42.1 47.2 52.1 52.3 54.7 54.4 56.7 58.4 42.3 47.3 51.7 55.2 56.1 54.7 56.9 57.4 42.3 47.0 52.7 53.0 55.6 55.4 58.1 58.1
SQuADv2 em dev 90.7 16 22.6 32.8 33.9 43.1 43.6 45.4 49.0 52.6 25.1 37.5 37.9 47.9 47.9 51.1 56.0 60.1 27.5 40.5 39.2 53.5 50.0 56.6 62.6 64.9
SQuADv2 f1 dev 93.0 16 28.3 40.2 41.4 50.3 51.0 52.7 56.3 59.5 30.1 43.6 44.1 54.0 54.1 57.1 61.8 65.4 32.1 45.5 44.9 58.7 55.9 62.1 67.7 69.8 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 208 | CoQA f1 dev 90.7 5 34.5 55.0 61.8 65.3 71.1 72.8 76.3 81.5 30.6 52.1 61.6 66.1 71.8 75.1 77.9 84.0 31.1 52.0 62.7 66.8 73.2 77.3 79.9 85.0
DROP f1 dev 89.1 20 9.40 13.6 14.4 16.4 19.7 17.0 24.0 23.6 11.7 18.1 20.9 23.0 26.4 27.3 29.2 34.3 12.9 18.7 24.0 25.6 29.7 29.7 32.3 36.5
BoolQ acc dev 91.0 32 49.7 60.3 58.9 62.4 67.1 65.4 66.2 60.5 52.6 61.7 60.4 63.7 68.4 68.7 69.0 76.7 43.1 60.6 62.0 64.1 70.3 70.0 70.2 77.5 76.4 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 209 | CB acc dev 96.9 32 0.00 32.1 8.93 19.6 19.6 28.6 19.6 46.4 55.4 53.6 53.6 48.2 57.1 33.9 55.4 64.3 42.9 58.9 53.6 69.6 67.9 60.7 66.1 82.1 75.6
CB f1 dev 93.9 32 0.00 29.3 11.4 17.4 22.4 25.1 20.3 42.8 60.1 39.8 45.6 37.5 45.7 28.5 44.6 52.5 26.1 40.4 32.6 48.3 45.7 44.6 46.0 57.2 52.0
Copa acc dev 94.8 32 66.0 68.0 73.0 77.0 76.0 80.0 84.0 91.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 74.0 76.0 82.0 86.0 87.0 67.0 64.0 72.0 77.0 83.0 83.0 86.0 92.0 92.0 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 210 | RTE acc dev 92.5 32 47.7 49.8 48.4 56.0 46.6 55.2 62.8 63.5 53.1 47.3 49.5 49.5 54.9 54.9 56.3 70.4 52.3 48.4 46.9 50.9 56.3 49.5 60.6 72.9 69.0
WiC acc dev 76.1 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.0 50.3 50.3 49.2 49.4 50.3 50.0 48.6 49.8 55.0 53.0 53.0 51.6 53.1 51.1 55.3 49.4
WSC acc dev 93.8 32 59.6 56.7 65.4 61.5 66.3 60.6 64.4 65.4 58.7 58.7 60.6 62.5 66.3 60.6 66.3 69.2 58.7 60.6 54.8 49.0 62.5 67.3 75.0 75.0 80.1 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 211 | MultiRC acc dev 62.3 32 4.72 9.65 12.3 13.6 14.3 18.4 24.2 27.6 4.72 9.65 12.3 13.6 14.3 18.4 24.2 27.6 6.09 11.8 16.8 20.8 24.7 23.8 25.0 32.5 30.5
MultiRC f1a dev 88.2 32 57.0 59.7 60.4 59.9 60.0 64.5 71.4 72.9 57.0 59.7 60.4 59.9 60.0 64.5 71.4 72.9 45.0 55.9 64.2 65.4 69.5 66.4 69.3 74.8 75.4
ReCoRD acc dev 92.5 32 70.8 78.5 82.1 84.1 86.2 88.6 89.0 90.2 69.8 77.0 80.7 83.0 85.9 88.0 88.8 90.2 69.8 77.2 81.3 83.1 86.6 87.9 88.9 89.0 90.2 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 212 | ReCoRD f1 dev 93.3 32 71.9 79.2 82.8 85.2 87.3 89.5 90.4 91.0 70.7 77.8 81.6 83.9 86.8 88.8 89.7 91.2 70.7 77.9 82.1 84.0 87.5 88.8 89.8 90.1 91.1
SuperGLUE average dev 89.0 40.6 47.4 46.8 49.6 50.1 52.3 54.4 58.2 54.4 55.1 56.7 57.8 61.2 59.7 64.3 68.9 50.2 56.2 56.8 60.0 64.3 63.6 66.9 73.2 71.8
ANLI R1 acc test 73.8 50 33.4 34.2 33.4 33.4 34.2 32.3 33.2 34.6 32.1 31.6 31.9 34.6 30.6 31.6 32.7 32.0 32.1 32.5 30.9 32.5 33.5 33.1 33.3 36.8 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 213 | ANLI R2 acc test 50.7 50 33.2 31.9 33.3 33.3 33.8 33.5 33.5 35.4 35.7 33.7 33.2 32.7 32.7 33.9 33.9 33.9 35.7 33.8 32.1 31.4 32.6 33.3 32.6 34.0
ANLI R3 acc test 48.3 50 33.6 34.0 33.8 33.4 35.3 34.8 34.4 34.5 35.0 32.6 33.0 33.9 34.1 33.1 32.5 35.1 35.0 34.4 35.1 36.0 32.7 33.9 34.5 40.2
2D+ acc n/a 50 0.70 0.65 0.70 0.85 1.10 2.54 15.4 76.9 2.00 0.55 3.15 4.00 12.1 19.6 73.0 99.6 2.00 4.10 3.50 4.50 8.90 11.9 55.5 100.0 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 214 | 2D- acc n/a 50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.60 7.60 12.6 58.0 1.15 0.95 1.45 1.95 3.85 11.5 44.6 86.4 1.15 1.45 2.25 2.70 7.35 13.6 52.4 98.9
3D+ acc n/a 50 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.25 1.40 34.2 0.15 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.45 0.95 15.4 65.5 0.15 0.45 0.30 0.55 0.75 0.90 8.40 80.4
3D- acc n/a 50 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.45 1.35 48.3 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.55 1.60 6.15 78.7 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.35 0.65 1.05 9.20 94.2 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 215 | 4D+ acc n/a 50 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.15 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.80 14.0 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.40 25.5
4D- acc n/a 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.50 14.0 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.40 26.8
5D+ acc n/a 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 9.30 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 216 | 5D- acc n/a 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90
2Dx acc n/a 50 2.20 2.25 2.65 2.10 2.55 5.80 6.15 19.8 1.35 2.35 3.35 2.35 4.75 9.15 11.0 27.4 1.35 2.90 2.70 2.85 4.25 6.10 7.05 29.2
1DC acc n/a 50 1.25 2.95 2.75 0.05 0.30 2.35 0.75 9.75 1.90 2.80 2.85 3.65 6.45 9.15 8.20 14.3 1.70 2.15 3.90 5.75 6.20 7.60 9.95 21.3 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 217 | Cycled Letters acc n/a 100 0.62 0.71 2.85 0.00 0.63 1.35 2.58 3.66 1.67 4.36 5.68 6.46 6.25 9.41 15.1 21.7 4.63 9.27 10.7 14.5 16.7 21.9 27.7 37.9
Anagrams 1 acc n/a 100 0.10 0.14 0.40 0.00 0.27 0.69 1.16 2.28 0.21 0.61 1.12 1.27 1.60 2.72 3.72 8.62 0.50 1.27 2.13 3.05 3.81 5.49 8.38 15.1
Anagrams 2 acc n/a 100 0.81 1.21 2.69 0.01 1.71 3.75 4.53 8.91 1.19 2.62 4.70 4.77 6.97 10.2 14.6 25.9 1.94 4.80 7.59 9.87 12.6 18.9 25.6 39.7 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 218 | Symbol Insertion acc n/a 100 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.42 0.89 8.26 0.03 0.05 0.57 1.18 1.67 3.46 6.62 45.4 0.11 0.28 2.19 4.18 6.61 11.0 27.3 67.2
Reversed Words acc n/a 100 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.48 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.17 0.24 0.30 0.42 0.44
SAT Analogies acc n/a 20 35.6 39.0 45.2 44.1 50.0 49.2 52.7 53.7 30.5 41.2 43.1 46.5 55.1 54.3 53.5 59.1 30.5 40.4 42.8 40.6 48.4 51.9 53.5 65.2
Table H.1: Scores for every task, setting and model that we investigate in this paper.
63
Figure H.1: All results for all SuperGLUE tasks.
Figure H.2: Results for SAT task. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 219 | 63
Figure H.1: All results for all SuperGLUE tasks.
Figure H.2: Results for SAT task.
Figure H.3: All results for all Winograd tasks.
64
Figure H.4: All results for all Arithmetic tasks.
Figure H.5: All results for all Cloze and Completion tasks.
65
Figure H.6: All results for all Common Sense Reasoning tasks.
Figure H.7: All results for all QA tasks.
Figure H.8: All results for all Reading Comprehension tasks.
Figure H.9: All results for all ANLI rounds.
66
Figure H.10: All results for all Scramble tasks.
Figure H.11: All results for all Translation tasks.
67
References
[ADG+16]Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez, Matthew W Hoffman, David Pfau, Tom Schaul,
Brendan Shillingford, and Nando De Freitas. Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent.
InAdvances in neural information processing systems , pages 3981–3989, 2016.
[AI19] WeChat AI. Tr-mt (ensemble), December 2019.
[AJF19] Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, and Orhan Firat. Massively multilingual neural machine translation. In | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 220 | [AJF19] Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, and Orhan Firat. Massively multilingual neural machine translation. In
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational
Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , 2019.
[BBDIW20] Su Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daum ´e III, and Hanna Wallach. Language (technology) is power:
A critical survey of “bias” in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14050 , 2020.
[BCFL13] Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. Semantic parsing on freebase from
question-answer pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language
processing , pages 1533–1544, 2013.
[BDD+09]Luisa Bentivogli, Ido Dagan, Hoa Trang Dang, Danilo Giampiccolo, and Bernardo Magnini. The fifth
PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. 2009.
[BES10] Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 221 | [BES10] Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical
resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Lrec, volume 10, pages 2200–2204, 2010.
[BHDD+06]Roy Bar Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, and Idan
Szpektor. The second PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. 2006.
[BHT+20]Yonatan Bisk, Ari Holtzman, Jesse Thomason, Jacob Andreas, Yoshua Bengio, Joyce Chai, Mirella
Lapata, Angeliki Lazaridou, Jonathan May, Aleksandr Nisnevich, et al. Experience grounds language.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10151 , 2020.
[BLC13] Yoshua Bengio, Nicholas L ´eonard, and Aaron C. Courville. Estimating or propagating gradients through
stochastic neurons for conditional computation. Arxiv , 2013.
[BZB+19]Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao, and Yejin Choi. Piqa: Reasoning about | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 222 | physical commonsense in natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.11641 , 2019.
[Car97] Rich Caruana. Multitask learning. Machine learning , 28(1), 1997.
[CB78] Susan Carey and Elsa Bartlett. Acquiring a single new word. Proceedings of the Stanford Child Language
Conference , 1978.
[CCE+18]Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and
Oyvind Tafjord. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. ArXiv ,
abs/1803.05457, 2018.
[CGRS19] Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. Generating long sequences with sparse
transformers, 2019.
[CHI+18]Eunsol Choi, He He, Mohit Iyyer, Mark Yatskar, Wen-tau Yih, Yejin Choi, Percy Liang, and Luke
Zettlemoyer. Quac : Question answering in context. Arxiv , 2018.
[CLC+19]Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 223 | [CLC+19]Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina
Toutanova. BoolQ: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1905.10044 , 2019.
[CLY+19]Yen-Chun Chen, Linjie Li, Licheng Yu, Ahmed El Kholy, Faisal Ahmed, Zhe Gan, Yu Cheng, and
Jingjing Liu. Uniter: Learning universal image-text representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11740 ,
2019.
[Cra17] Kate Crawford. The trouble with bias. NIPS 2017 Keynote , 2017.
[DCLT18] Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training of deep
bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , 2018.
68
[DGM06] Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment
challenge. In Machine learning challenges. evaluating predictive uncertainty, visual object classification, | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 224 | challenge. In Machine learning challenges. evaluating predictive uncertainty, visual object classification,
and recognising textual entailment , pages 177–190. Springer, 2006.
[DGV+18]Mostafa Dehghani, Stephan Gouws, Oriol Vinyals, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Lukasz Kaiser. Universal
transformers. Arxiv , 2018.
[DHKH14] Nadir Durrani, Barry Haddow, Philipp Koehn, and Kenneth Heafield. Edinburgh’s phrase-based machine
translation systems for wmt-14. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation ,
pages 97–104, 2014.
[DL15] Andrew M. Dai and Quoc V . Le. Semi-supervised sequence learning. In Advances in neural information
processing systems , 2015.
[DMST19] Marie-Catherine De Marneffe, Mandy Simons, and Judith Tonhauser. The CommitmentBank: Investigating projection in naturally occurring discourse. 2019. To appear in proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung
23. Data can be found at https://github.com/mcdm/CommitmentBank/. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 225 | 23. Data can be found at https://github.com/mcdm/CommitmentBank/.
[DSC+16]Yan Duan, John Schulman, Xi Chen, Peter L. Bartlett, Ilya Sutskever, and Pieter Abbeel. Rl2: Fast
reinforcement learning via slow reinforcement learning. ArXiv , abs/1611.02779, 2016.
[DWD+19]Dheeru Dua, Yizhong Wang, Pradeep Dasigi, Gabriel Stanovsky, Sameer Singh, and Matt Gardner.
Drop: A reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1903.00161 , 2019.
[DYY+19]Zihang Dai, Zhilin Yang, Yiming Yang, Jaime G. Carbonell, Quoc V . Le, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov.
Transformer-xl: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context. Arxiv , 2019.
[EOAG18] Sergey Edunov, Myle Ott, Michael Auli, and David Grangier. Understanding back-translation at scale.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09381 , 2018. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 226 | arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09381 , 2018.
[FAL17] Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of
deep networks. ArXiv , abs/1703.03400, 2017.
[Fyo00] Yaroslav Fyodorov. A natural logic inference system, 2000.
[GG19] Hila Gonen and Yoav Goldberg. Lipstick on a pig: Debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases
in word embeddings but do not remove them. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03862 , 2019.
[GLT+20]Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, and Ming-Wei Chang. Realm: Retrievalaugmented language model pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08909 , 2020.
[GMDD07] Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan. The third PASCAL recognizing
textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL workshop on textual entailment and
paraphrasing , pages 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 227 | paraphrasing , pages 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007.
[Gra16] Alex Graves. Adaptive computation time for recurrent neural networks. Arxiv , 2016.
[GSL+18]Suchin Gururangan, Swabha Swayamdipta, Omer Levy, Roy Schwartz, Samuel R Bowman, and Noah A
Smith. Annotation artifacts in natural language inference data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02324 , 2018.
[GSR19] Sebastian Gehrmann, Hendrik Strobelt, and Alexander M. Rush. Gltr: Statistical detection and visualization of generated text. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1906.04043 , 2019.
[GWC+18]Jiatao Gu, Yong Wang, Yun Chen, Kyunghyun Cho, and Victor OK Li. Meta-learning for low-resource
neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08437 , 2018.
[HB20] Daniel Hernandez and Tom Brown. Ai and efficiency, May 2020.
[HBFC19] Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration.
CoRR , abs/1904.09751, 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 228 | CoRR , abs/1904.09751, 2019.
[HLW+20]Dan Hendrycks, Xiaoyuan Liu, Eric Wallace, Adam Dziedzic, Rishabh Krishnan, and Dawn Song.
Pretrained transformers improve out of distribution robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06100 , 2020.
69
[HNA+17]Joel Hestness, Sharan Narang, Newsha Ardalani, Gregory Diamos, Heewoo Jun, Hassan Kianinejad, Md.
Mostofa Ali Patwary, Yang Yang, and Yanqi Zhou. Deep learning scaling is predictable, empirically.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.00409 , 2017.
[HR18] Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1801.06146 , 2018.
[HVD15] Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1503.02531 , 2015.
[HYC01] Sepp Hochreiter, A Steven Younger, and Peter R Conwell. Learning to Learn Using Gradient Descent. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 229 | [HYC01] Sepp Hochreiter, A Steven Younger, and Peter R Conwell. Learning to Learn Using Gradient Descent.
InInternational Conference on Artificial Neural Networks , pages 87–94. Springer, 2001.
[HZJ+19]Po-Sen Huang, Huan Zhang, Ray Jiang, Robert Stanforth, Johannes Welbl, Jack Rae, Vishal Maini,
Dani Yogatama, and Pushmeet Kohli. Reducing sentiment bias in language models via counterfactual
evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03064 , 2019.
[IBGC+14]Mohit Iyyer, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Leonardo Claudino, Richard Socher, and Hal Daum ´e III. A neural
network for factoid question answering over paragraphs. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing , 2014.
[IDCBE19] Daphne Ippolito, Daniel Duckworth, Chris Callison-Burch, and Douglas Eck. Automatic detection of
generated text is easiest when humans are fooled. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00650 , 2019.
[JCWZ17] Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel S. Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 230 | [JCWZ17] Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel S. Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly
supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551 , 2017.
[JN20] Zheng Junyuan and Gamma Lab NYC. Numeric transformer - albert, March 2020.
[JVS+16]Rafal Jozefowicz, Oriol Vinyals, Mike Schuster, Noam Shazeer, and Yonghui Wu. Exploring the limits
of language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02410 , 2016.
[JYS+19]Xiaoqi Jiao, Yichun Yin, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Xiao Chen, Linlin Li, Fang Wang, and Qun Liu.
TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10351 , 2019.
[JZC+19]Ying Ju, Fubang Zhao, Shijie Chen, Bowen Zheng, Xuefeng Yang, and Yunfeng Liu. Technical report on
conversational question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10772 , 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 231 | conversational question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10772 , 2019.
[KCR+18]Daniel Khashabi, Snigdha Chaturvedi, Michael Roth, Shyam Upadhyay, and Dan Roth. Looking beyond
the surface: A challenge set for reading comprehension over multiple sentences. In Proceedings of North
American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) , 2018.
[KKS+20]Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi.
Unifiedqa: Crossing format boundaries with a single qa system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00700 , 2020.
[KMB20] Sarah E. Kreps, Miles McCain, and Miles Brundage. All the news that’s fit to fabricate: Ai-generated
text as a tool of media misinformation, 2020.
[KMH+20]Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott
Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models, 2020. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 232 | Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models, 2020.
[KPR+19]Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti,
Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Matthew Kelcey, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina N. Toutanova,
Llion Jones, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association of Computational
Linguistics , 2019.
[KR16] Yoon Kim and Alexander M. Rush. Sequence-level knowledge distillation. Arxiv , 2016.
[LB02] Edward Loper and Steven Bird. Nltk: The natural language toolkit, 2002.
[LC19] Guillaume Lample and Alexis Conneau. Cross-lingual language model pretraining. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1901.07291 , 2019.
70 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 233 | arXiv:1901.07291 , 2019.
70
[LCG+19]Zhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel, Piyush Sharma, and Radu Soricut. ALBERT: A lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1909.11942 , 2019.
[LCH+20]Xiaodong Liu, Hao Cheng, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen, Yu Wang, Hoifung Poon, and Jianfeng Gao.
Adversarial training for large neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08994 , 2020.
[LDL19] Zhongyang Li, Xiao Ding, and Ting Liu. Story ending prediction by transferable bert. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1905.07504 , 2019.
[LDM12] Hector Levesque, Ernest Davis, and Leora Morgenstern. The Winograd schema challenge. In Thirteenth
International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , 2012.
[LGG+20]Yinhan Liu, Jiatao Gu, Naman Goyal, Xian Li, Sergey Edunov, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Mike Lewis, and | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 234 | Luke Zettlemoyer. Multilingual denoising pre-training for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2001.08210 , 2020.
[LGH+15]Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Li Deng, Kevin Duh, and Ye-Yi Wang. Representation
learning using multi-task deep neural networks for semantic classification and information retrieval. In
Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational
Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2015.
[LH17] Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1711.05101 , 2017.
[LHCG19a] Xiaodong Liu, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen, and Jianfeng Gao. Improving multi-task deep neural
networks via knowledge distillation for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09482 ,
2019.
[LHCG19b] Xiaodong Liu, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen, and Jianfeng Gao. Multi-task deep neural networks for
natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11504 , 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 235 | natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11504 , 2019.
[Lin20] Tal Linzen. How can we accelerate progress towards human-like linguistic generalization? arXiv preprint
arXiv:2005.00955 , 2020.
[LLG+19]Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy,
Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural
language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 , 2019.
[LM17] Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. Learning to optimize neural nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00441 , 2017.
[LOG+19]Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis,
Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 236 | arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , 2019.
[LPP+20]Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal,
Heinrich K ¨uttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt ¨aschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Kiela Douwe.
Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11401 ,
2020.
[LSP+18]Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh, Etienne Pot, Ben Goodrich, Ryan Sepassi, Lukasz Kaiser, and Noam
Shazeer. Generating Wikipedia by summarizing long sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10198 , 2018.
[LWS+20]Zhuohan Li, Eric Wallace, Sheng Shen, Kevin Lin, Kurt Keutzer, Dan Klein, and Joseph E. Gonzalez.
Train large, then compress: Rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers,
2020.
[LXL+17]Guokun Lai, Qizhe Xie, Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang, and Eduard Hovy. Race: Large-scale reading | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 237 | [LXL+17]Guokun Lai, Qizhe Xie, Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang, and Eduard Hovy. Race: Large-scale reading
comprehension dataset from examinations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04683 , 2017.
[LYN+20]Sheng-Chieh Lin, Jheng-Hong Yang, Rodrigo Nogueira, Ming-Feng Tsai, Chuan-Ju Wang, and Jimmy
Lin. Tttttackling winogrande schemas. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08380 , 2020.
[Mac92] David. MacKay. Information-based objective functions for active data selection. Neural Computation ,
1992.
71
[MBXS17] Bryan McCann, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 6294–6305,
2017.
[MCCD13] Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. Efficient estimation of word representations
in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 , 2013. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 238 | in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 , 2013.
[MCH+16]Nasrin Mostafazadeh, Nathanael Chambers, Xiaodong He, Devi Parikh, Dhruv Batra, Lucy Vanderwende,
Pushmeet Kohli, and James Allen. A corpus and evaluation framework for deeper understanding of
commonsense stories. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.01696 , 2016.
[MCKS18] Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. Can a suit of armor conduct electricity?
a new dataset for open book question answering. ArXiv , abs/1809.02789, 2018.
[MKAT18] Sam McCandlish, Jared Kaplan, Dario Amodei, and OpenAI Dota Team. An empirical model of
large-batch training, 2018.
[MKM+94]Mitchell Marcus, Grace Kim, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, Robert MacIntyre, Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson,
Karen Katz, and Britta Schasberger. The penn treebank: annotating predicate argument structure.
InProceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology , pages 114–119. Association for
Computational Linguistics, 1994. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 239 | InProceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology , pages 114–119. Association for
Computational Linguistics, 1994.
[MKXS18] Bryan McCann, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. The natural language
decathlon: Multitask learning as question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08730 , 2018.
[MPL19] R Thomas McCoy, Ellie Pavlick, and Tal Linzen. Right for the wrong reasons: Diagnosing syntactic
heuristics in natural language inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01007 , 2019.
[MWZ+18]Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson,
Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. Model cards for model reporting, 2018.
[NBR20] Moin Nadeem, Anna Bethke, and Siva Reddy. Stereoset: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained
language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09456 , 2020.
[NK19] Timothy Niven and Hung-Yu Kao. Probing neural network comprehension of natural language arguments. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 240 | [NK19] Timothy Niven and Hung-Yu Kao. Probing neural network comprehension of natural language arguments.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07355 , 2019.
[Nor09] Peter Norvig. Natural language corpus data, 2009.
[NvNvdG19] Malvina Nissim, Rik van Noord, and Rob van der Goot. Fair is better than sensational: Man is to doctor
as woman is to doctor. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09866 , 2019.
[NWD+19]Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. Adversarial
nli: A new benchmark for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14599 , 2019.
[oR16] University of Regensburg. Fascha, 2016.
[PCC18] Mohammad Taher Pilehvar and Jose Camacho-Collados. WIC: 10,000 example pairs for evaluating
context-sensitive representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09121 , 2018.
[PFB18] Jason Phang, Thibault F ´evry, and Samuel R. Bowman. Sentence encoders on STILTs: Supplementary | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 241 | [PFB18] Jason Phang, Thibault F ´evry, and Samuel R. Bowman. Sentence encoders on STILTs: Supplementary
training on intermediate labeled-data tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.01088 , 2018.
[PHR+18]Adam Poliak, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, J. Edward Hu, Ellie Pavlick, Aaron Steven White, and
Benjamin Van Durme. Collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation
evaluation. In Proceedings of EMNLP , 2018.
[PKL+16]Denis Paperno, Germ ´an Kruszewski, Angeliki Lazaridou, Quan Ngoc Pham, Raffaella Bernardi, Sandro
Pezzelle, Marco Baroni, Gemma Boleda, and Raquel Fern ´andez. The lambada dataset: Word prediction
requiring a broad discourse context. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06031 , 2016.
[PNZtY18] Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Wen tau Yih. Dissecting contextual word
embeddings: Architecture and representation, 2018. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 242 | embeddings: Architecture and representation, 2018.
[Pos18] Matt Post. A call for clarity in reporting BLEU scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08771 , 2018.
72
[PSM14] Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. GloVe: Global vectors for word
representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language
processing (EMNLP) , 2014.
[QIA20] QIANXIN. Sa-net on albert (ensemble), April 2020.
[QMZH19] Yusu Qian, Urwa Muaz, Ben Zhang, and Jae Won Hyun. Reducing gender bias in word-level language
models with a gender-equalizing loss function. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12801 , 2019.
[RBG11] Melissa Roemmele, Cosmin Adrian Bejan, and Andrew S Gordon. Choice of plausible alternatives: An
evaluation of commonsense causal reasoning. In 2011 AAAI Spring Symposium Series , 2011.
[RCM19] Siva Reddy, Danqi Chen, and Christopher D Manning. Coqa: A conversational question answering
challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 7:249–266, 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 243 | challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 7:249–266, 2019.
[RCP+17]Scott Reed, Yutian Chen, Thomas Paine, A ¨aron van den Oord, SM Eslami, Danilo Rezende, Oriol
Vinyals, and Nando de Freitas. Few-shot autoregressive density estimation: Towards learning to learn
distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10304 , 2017.
[RJL18] Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for
squad. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822 , 2018.
[RL16] Sachin Ravi and Hugo Larochelle. Optimization as a model for few-shot learning. ICLR 2017 (oral) ,
2016.
[RLL+19]Qiu Ran, Yankai Lin, Peng Li, Jie Zhou, and Zhiyuan Liu. NumNet: Machine reading comprehension
with numerical reasoning. In Proceedings of EMNLP , 2019.
[RNLVD18] Rachel Rudinger, Jason Naradowsky, Brian Leonard, and Benjamin Van Durme. Gender bias in | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 244 | [RNLVD18] Rachel Rudinger, Jason Naradowsky, Brian Leonard, and Benjamin Van Durme. Gender bias in
coreference resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09301 , 2018.
[RNSS18] Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever. Improving language understanding
by generative pre-training, 2018.
[Ros12] R.S. Ross. Guide for conducting risk assessments. NIST Special Publication , 2012.
[RRBS19] Jonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, and Nir Shavit. A constructive prediction of
the generalization error across scales, 2019.
[RRS20] Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters
of a language model? arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08910 , 2020.
[RSR+19]Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi
Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text
transformer, 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 245 | Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text
transformer, 2019.
[RWC+19]Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language
models are unsupervised multitask learners, 2019.
[SBBC19] Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. Winogrande: An adversarial
winograd schema challenge at scale, 2019.
[SBC+19]Irene Solaiman, Miles Brundage, Jack Clark, Amanda Askell, Ariel Herbert-V oss, Jeff Wu, Alec Radford,
Gretchen Krueger, Jong Wook Kim, Sarah Kreps, Miles McCain, Alex Newhouse, Jason Blazakis, Kris
McGuffie, and Jasmine Wang. Release strategies and the social impacts of language models, 2019.
[SCNP19] Emily Sheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Premkumar Natarajan, and Nanyun Peng. The woman worked as a
babysitter: On biases in language generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01326 , 2019. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 246 | babysitter: On biases in language generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01326 , 2019.
[SDCW19] Victor Sanh, Lysandre Debut, Julien Chaumond, and Thomas Wolf. DistilBERT, a distilled version of
BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108 , 2019.
[SDSE19] Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, and Oren Etzioni. Green AI. CoRR , abs/1907.10597, 2019.
[SHB15] Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. Improving neural machine translation models with
monolingual data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06709 , 2015.
73
[SMM+17]Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff
Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1701.06538 , 2017. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 247 | arXiv:1701.06538 , 2017.
[SPP+19]Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, Raul Puri, Patrick LeGresley, Jared Casper, and Bryan Catanzaro.
Megatron-lm: Training multi-billion parameter language models using model parallelism, 2019.
[SS20] Timo Schick and Hinrich Sch ¨utze. Exploiting cloze questions for few-shot text classification and natural
language inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.07676 , 2020.
[STQ+19]Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Jianfeng Lu, and Tie-Yan Liu. MASS: Masked sequence to sequence
pre-training for language generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.02450 , 2019.
[TFR+17]Josh Tobin, Rachel Fong, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Wojciech Zaremba, and Pieter Abbeel. Domain
randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ
international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) , pages 23–30. IEEE, 2017. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 248 | international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) , pages 23–30. IEEE, 2017.
[TL05] Peter D. Turney and Michael L. Littman. Corpus-based learning of analogies and semantic relations.
CoRR , abs/cs/0508103, 2005.
[TL18] Trieu H. Trinh and Quoc V . Le. A simple method for commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1806.02847 , 2018.
[TLBS03] Peter D. Turney, Michael L. Littman, Jeffrey Bigham, and Victor Shnayder. Combining independent
modules to solve multiple-choice synonym and analogy problems. CoRR , cs.CL/0309035, 2003.
[Tur20] Project Turing. Microsoft research blog, Feb 2020.
[VBL+16]Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. Matching Networks for One
Shot Learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 3630–3638, 2016.
[VSP+17]Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 249 | Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing
systems , 2017.
[WPN+19]Alex Wang, Yada Pruksachatkun, Nikita Nangia, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer
Levy, and Samuel Bowman. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 3261–3275, 2019.
[WXH+18]Yiren Wang, Yingce Xia, Tianyu He, Fei Tian, Tao Qin, ChengXiang Zhai, and Tie-Yan Liu. Multi-agent
dual learning. ICLR 2019 , 2018.
[XDH+19]Qizhe Xie, Zihang Dai, Eduard Hovy, Minh-Thang Luong, and Quoc V . Le. Unsupervised data
augmentation for consistency training, 2019.
[YdC+19]Dani Yogatama, Cyprien de Masson d’Autume, Jerome Connor, Tomas Kocisky, Mike Chrzanowski,
Lingpeng Kong, Angeliki Lazaridou, Wang Ling, Lei Yu, Chris Dyer, et al. Learning and evaluating | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 250 | Lingpeng Kong, Angeliki Lazaridou, Wang Ling, Lei Yu, Chris Dyer, et al. Learning and evaluating
general linguistic intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11373 , 2019.
[YDY+19]Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime Carbonell, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V . Le. XLNet:
Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08237 ,
2019.
[ZHB+19]Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. Hellaswag: Can a machine
really finish your sentence? arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07830 , 2019.
[ZHR+19]Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Franziska Roesner, and Yejin
Choi. Defending against neural fake news. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12616 , 2019.
[ZLL+18]Sheng Zhang, Xiaodong Liu, Jingjing Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme. | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2005.14165 | 251 | [ZLL+18]Sheng Zhang, Xiaodong Liu, Jingjing Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Kevin Duh, and Benjamin Van Durme.
ReCoRD: Bridging the gap between human and machine commonsense reading comprehension. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1810.12885 , 2018.
[ZSW+19a] Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul
Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences, 2019.
74
[ZSW+19b] Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. ArXiv , abs/1909.08593,
2019.
75 | 2005.14165 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners | Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on
a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method
still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of
thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language
task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which
current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up
language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes
even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning
approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with
175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model,
and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is
applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot
demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3
achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation,
question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require
on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a
novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time,
we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles,
as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to
training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples
of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from
articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding
and of GPT-3 in general. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165 | [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Benjamin Mann",
"Nick Ryder",
"Melanie Subbiah",
"Jared Kaplan",
"Prafulla Dhariwal",
"Arvind Neelakantan",
"Pranav Shyam",
"Girish Sastry",
"Amanda Askell",
"Sandhini Agarwal",
"Ariel Herbert-Voss",
"Gretchen Krueger",
"Tom Henighan",
"Rewon Child",
"Aditya Ramesh",
"Daniel M. Ziegler",
"Jeffrey Wu",
"Clemens Winter",
"Christopher Hesse",
"Mark Chen",
"Eric Sigler",
"Mateusz Litwin",
"Scott Gray",
"Benjamin Chess",
"Jack Clark",
"Christopher Berner",
"Sam McCandlish",
"Alec Radford",
"Ilya Sutskever",
"Dario Amodei"
] | [
"cs.CL"
] | 40+32 pages | null | cs.CL | 20200528 | 20200722 | [
{
"id": "1606.04474",
"title": "Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent",
"authors": "Marcin Andrychowicz, et al.",
"year": "2016"
},
{
"id": "1903.00089",
"title": "Massively multilingual neural machine translation",
"authors": "Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, Orhan Firat",
"year": "2019"
},
{
"id": "2005.14050",
"title": "Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP",
"authors": "Su Lin Blodgett, et al.",
"year": "2020"
}
] |
2007.10703 | 0 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action
Detection from Untrimmed Videos
Anurag Arnab, Chen Sun, Arsha Nagrani, and Cordelia Schmid
Google Research
faarnab, chensun, anagrani, cordelias [email protected]
Abstract. Despite the recent advances in video classi cation, progress
in spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frameby-frame. In this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition
model that is trained with only video-level labels, which are signi cantly
easier to annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors
which have been trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework. We show how we can apply our method in
cases where the standard Multiple Instance Learning assumption, that
each bag contains at least one instance with the speci ed label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL where we estimate the
uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report the rst weaklysupervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art results among
weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24.
Keywords: spatio-temporal action recognition, weak supervision, video | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 1 | weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24.
Keywords: spatio-temporal action recognition, weak supervision, video
understanding, mulitple instance learning
1 Introduction
Video classi cation has witnessed great advances recently due to large datasets
such as Kinetics [ 20] and Moments in Time [ 30] which have enabled training
of specialised neural network architectures for video [ 5,9]. However, progress in
other video understanding tasks, such as spatio-temporal action detection, has
lagged behind in comparison. There are fewer datasets for action recognition,
which are also signi cantly smaller than their video-classi cation counterparts. A
reason for this is the exorbitant cost of annotating videos with spatio-temporal
labels { each frame of an action has to be manually labelled with a bounding
box. Moreover, annotating temporal boundaries of actions is not only arduous,
but often ambiguous with annotators failing to reach consensus about the start
and end times of an action [6,39].
In this paper, we propose a method to train spatio-temporal action detectors
using only weak, video-level annotations as shown in Fig. 1. To achieve this, we
leverage image-based person detectors which have been trained on large image
datasets such as Microsoft COCO [ 26] and are accurate across large variations | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 2 | leverage image-based person detectors which have been trained on large image
datasets such as Microsoft COCO [ 26] and are accurate across large variations
in appearance, scene and pose. We adopt a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL)arXiv:2007.10703v1 [cs.CV] 21 Jul 2020
2 A. Arnab et al.
Training dataPrediction
Labels:
sit, talk to (people), watch (a person), carry/hold (an object), listen to (a person)
sit, carry/hold (an object), listen to (a person), talk to (people), watch (a person)
sit, talk to (people), watch (a person)
sit, listen to (a person), watch (a person)
time
Fig. 1. We propose a method to train a spatio-temporal action detector using only
weak, video-level labels on challenging, real-world datasets. Note that the video-level
labels that we have may apply to multiple people in the video, and that these labels
may only be active for an unannotated time interval of the input clip.
framework, where a person tubelet is an instance, and all person tubelets in the
video form a bag. An important consideration in our approach is the presence of | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 3 | framework, where a person tubelet is an instance, and all person tubelets in the
video form a bag. An important consideration in our approach is the presence of
label noise: this is introduced from using o -the-shelf person detectors which have
not been trained on the video-dataset of interest, and also the fact that we have
to sample tubelets from large bags in long videos due to memory constraints. In
both of these scenarios, the standard Multiple Instance Learning assumption [ 7],
that each bag contains at least one instance with the bag-level label, may be
violated. We are not aware of previous work that has explicitly addressed this
problem, and we do so with a probabilistic variant of MIL where we estimate the
uncertainty of an instance-level prediction.
Using our approach, we obtain state-of-the-art results among weakly-supervised
methods on the UCF101-24 dataset. Furthermore, we report, to our knowledge,
the rst weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset (the only large-scale
dataset for spatio-temporal action recognition), where we also show the accuracy
trade-o s when annotating video-clips for time intervals of varying durations.
2 Related Work
Most prior work on spatio-temporal action recognition has been fully-supervised. | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 4 | 2 Related Work
Most prior work on spatio-temporal action recognition has been fully-supervised.
Initial approaches in the area used 3D sliding window detectors in conjunction
with handcrafted, volumetric features [ 21,25]. Current state-of-the-art approaches
are temporal extensions of object detection architectures [ 19,41,52,35] such as
Faster-RCNN [ 37] and SSD [ 27]. These approaches predict bounding boxes around
the action in a frame, using as input either a single frame along with optical
Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection 3
ow to capture temporal information [ 41,38] or multiple frames at the input to
provide temporal context [ 19]. The predicted bounding boxes are then linked
over time using an online, greedy algorithm or dynamic programming to create
spatio-temporal tracks. Our work builds on these methods by also utilising a
detection architecture and spatio-temporal linking. However, these approaches
all require bounding box annotations at each frame in the video whilst we only
use video-level labels which are signi cantly cheaper to acquire.
Weakly supervised approaches to spatio-temporal action recognition have
also been explored before as they enable a signi cant reduction in annotation | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 5 | Weakly supervised approaches to spatio-temporal action recognition have
also been explored before as they enable a signi cant reduction in annotation
time and cost. Relevant to our approach is the work of [ 6]. Che ron et al. [6] also
use person detections, and infer their action labels using a formulation based on
discriminative clustering [ 2]. Although their approach allows them to incorporate
di erent types of supervision, it e ectively learns a linear classi er on top of
pretrained, deep features. Our method in contrast is learned fully end-to-end.
Mettes et al. [29] also employed Multiple Instance Learning (MIL), but used
action proposals [ 47] instead of the human detections used by our work and [ 6].
However, [ 29], rely on additional cheap \point" annotations (a single spatial point
annotated for a subset of the frames which constitute the action) which also
ensures that the standard MIL assumption is not violated. In follow-up work [ 28],
the authors removed the need for \point" annotations by incorporating biases
(i.e.the presence of objects in the video, a bias that actions typically occur in the
centre of a frame) instead. Finally, Weinzaepfel et al. [50] also used a Multiple | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 6 | centre of a frame) instead. Finally, Weinzaepfel et al. [50] also used a Multiple
Instance Learning framework in conjunction with human detections. The authors,
however, assumed that sparse spatial supervision was present ( i.e.bounding
boxes for a small subset of frames in the action tube), unlike our method which
requires video-level labels alone.
We also note that many approaches have addressed temporal action detection
(localising actions in time but not space) with only video-level tags as supervision [ 48,42,31,34]. UntrimmedNets [ 48] uses a network with two branches, a
classi cation module to perform action classi cation and a selection module to
select relevant frames.Hide-and-Seek [ 42] obtains more precise temporal boundaries by forcing the network to attend to more discriminative frames by randomly
hiding parts of videos. However, these methods are trained and evaluated on
datasets such as ActivityNet [ 4] and THUMOS14 [ 18], which contain mostly one
action per video, and are thus signi cantly less challenging than datasets such as
AVA [14] which we evaluate on.
Finally, we note that another approach to combat the e ort of dataset
annotation has been various forms of self-supervised learning, where discriminative | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 7 | Finally, we note that another approach to combat the e ort of dataset
annotation has been various forms of self-supervised learning, where discriminative
feature representations can be learned with unlabelled data. Examples in video
include cross-modal self-supervised learning by learning correspondences between
the audio and image streams readily available in videos [ 1,33,51], transcribed
speech [ 44] or using meta-data such as hashtags [ 10] as a form of weak labelling.
Self-supervised approaches, however, are complementary to our approach, as they
still require a limited amount of fully-labelled data for the nal task of interest.
4 A. Arnab et al.
In our weakly-supervised action detection scenario, we never have access to full,
spatio-temporal ground-truth annotations for a single training example.
3 Proposed Approach
As shown in Fig. 1, given a set of video clips, with only clip-level annotations of
the actions taking place, our goal is to learn a model to recognise and localise
these actions in space and time. Our method is based on Multiple Instance
Learning (MIL) which we brie
y review in Sec. 3.1. Thereafter, we show how we | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 8 | Learning (MIL) which we brie
y review in Sec. 3.1. Thereafter, we show how we
use it for weakly-supervised spatio-temporal action recognition in Sec. 3.2. We
then describe how the standard MIL assumption, is often violated in our scenario
and describe a method to mitigate this by leveraging uncertainty estimates by
our network in Sec. 3.3. Finally, we discuss implementation details of our network
in Sec. 3.4.
3.1 Multiple Instance Learning
In the standard Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) [ 7] formulation, one is given a
bag ofNinstances, denoted as x=fx1;x2;:::;xNg. The class labels for each
of the instances is unknown, but the label for the entire bag, x, is known. The
standard MIL assumption is that a bag is assigned a class label if at least one
instance in the bag is associated with this label. More formally, we consider the
multi-label classi cation case, where the label vector for the bag is y2RC, and
yl= 1 if there is at least one instance with the lthlabel is present in the bag,
andyl= 0 otherwise. Note that each bag can be labelled with multiple of the C
class labels. | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 9 | andyl= 0 otherwise. Note that each bag can be labelled with multiple of the C
class labels.
Our goal is to train an instance-level classi er (parameterised as a neural
network), that predicts p(yl= 1jxj), or the label probabilities for the jthinstance.
However, as we only have the labels for the entire bag, and not each instance,
MIL methods aggregate the set of instance-level probabilities, fpijgfor a bag
i, to bag-level probabilities, pi, using an aggregation function, g(), where the
probabilities are obtained from a suitable activation function (sigmoid or softmax)
on the logits output by the neural network:
p(yil= 1jx1;x2;:::;xN) =g(pi1;pi2;:::;piN): (1)
Once we have bag-level predictions, we can apply a standard classi cation
loss between the bag-level probabilities and bag-level ground truth, and train a
neural network with stochastic gradient descent. Since we consider the multi-label
classi cation case, we use the binary cross-entropy:
Lce(x;y) = NbX
iCX | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 10 | classi cation case, we use the binary cross-entropy:
Lce(x;y) = NbX
iCX
lyillogpil+ (1 yil) log(1 pil) (2)
Note that we de ned pilas the bag-level probability of the ithbag taking the
lthlabel, which is obtained using Eq. 1, and Nbis the number of bags in the
mini-batch.
Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection 5
Aggregation The aggregation function, g(), can naturally be implemented in
neural networks as a global pooling function over all outputs of the network.
Common, permutation-invariant pooling functions include, max-pooling, generalised mean-pooling and log-sum-exponential (LSE) pooling [ 3] (a smooth and
convex approximation of the maximum function) respectively:
g(fpjg) = max
jpj (3)
g(fpjg) =0
@1
jjjX
jpr
j1
A1
r
(4)
g(fpjg) =1
rlog0
@1
jjjX
jerpj1
A (5) | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 11 | A1
r
(4)
g(fpjg) =1
rlog0
@1
jjjX
jerpj1
A (5)
Max-pooling only considers the top-scoring instance in the bag, and thus naturally
captures the MIL assumption that at least one instance in the bag has the
speci ed, bag-level label. Moreover, it can also be more robust to instances in
the bag that do not have the bag-level label. However, mean and LSE pooling
have been employed in applications such as weakly-supervised segmentation
[36], object recognition [ 45] and medical imaging [ 24] where multiple instances
in the bag do typically have the bag-level label. Note that higher values of
therhyperparameter for both these functions increases their \peakiness" and
approximates the maximum value. For our scenario, detailed in the next section,
we found max-pooling to be the most appropriate.
3.2 Weakly-supervised spatio-temporal action recognition as
multiple instance learning
Our goal is to learn a model to recognise and localise actions in space and
time given only video-level annotations. To facilitate this, we leverage a person
detector that has been trained on a large image dataset, i.e.Microsoft COCO [ 26]. | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 12 | time given only video-level annotations. To facilitate this, we leverage a person
detector that has been trained on a large image dataset, i.e.Microsoft COCO [ 26].
Concretely, we run a person detector on our training videos, and create person
tubelets which are person detections over Kconsecutive frames in the video.
Our bag for multiple instance learning thus consists of all the tubelets within a
video, and is annotated with the video-level labels that we have as supervision,
as illustrated in Fig. 2. Note that the size of the bag varies for every video clip, as
the bag size is determined by the length of the video and the number of detected
people.
As shown in Fig. 2, our network architecture for this task is a Fast-RCNN [ 12]
style detector that has been extended temporally. Given a video clip of Kframes,
and proposals which in our case are person detections, the network classi es the
action(s) taking place at the centre frame of each proposal, given the temporal
context of the K 1 frames around it.
Note that the spatio-temporal localisation task is e ectively factorised: the
spatial localisation capability of the model depends on the quality of the person
6 A. Arnab et al. | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 13 | spatial localisation capability of the model depends on the quality of the person
6 A. Arnab et al.
CNN feature extractorROI AlignClassifier
Uncertainty-aware MILLoss ℒMultiple Instance Learning Bag
Probabilities, pUncertainties, σ
Bag-level label
…
stand, listen to (a person), watch (a person),
walk, carry/hold (an object) …
Fig. 2. Overview of our approach for training an action detector in a weakly-supervised
manner using multiple instance learning: Each bag consists of all the tubelets that have
been extracted from the video-clip. These tubelets are obtained using an o -the-shelf
person detector which has not been trained on the dataset of interest. These tubelets
act as proposals for a Fast-RCNN style detector operating on a sequence of rgb images.
The predictions for each of the tubelets in the bag are then aggregated together, and
compared to the bag-level label. Uncertainty estimates produced by the network are
used to compensate for noise in the bag-level labels during training.
detections. Temporal localisation, on the other hand, is performed by linking
person tubelets through the video as commonly done in the literature [ 19,41,52,6], | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 14 | detections. Temporal localisation, on the other hand, is performed by linking
person tubelets through the video as commonly done in the literature [ 19,41,52,6],
since this method can scale to arbitrarily long videos. We use the same algorithm
as Kalogeiton et al. [19] which links together detections within a small temporal
window greedily based on the spatial intersection over union (IoU) between
bounding boxes on consecutive frames.
Finally, note that for a video consisting of Tframes, the bag could consist of
T K+1 person tubelets if a person is detected on each frame of the video, and a
tubelet is started from each frame. Due to memory limitations, it is infeasible to t
an entire bag onto a GPU for training. As a result, we uniformly sample instances
from each bag during training, whilst still retaining the original bag-level label.
This introduces additional noise into the problem, as detailed next.
3.3 Label noise and violation of the standard MIL assumption
The standard MIL assumption, that at least one instance in the bag is assigned
the bag-level label is often violated in our scenario. There are two primary factors
for this: Firstly, due to computational constraints, we cannot process a whole bag
at a time, but must instead sample instances from a bag. It is therefore possible | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 15 | for this: Firstly, due to computational constraints, we cannot process a whole bag
at a time, but must instead sample instances from a bag. It is therefore possible
to sample a bag that does not contain any tubelets with the labelled action. The
Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection 7
Predicted
uncertainty
,
Predicted probability
,
b
a
c
Wrong prediction. Low
uncertainty. Highest loss
Correct prediction. Low
uncertainty. Lowest loss
Incorrect prediction. High uncertainty. Moderate loss
Fig. 3. The loss surface of our uncertainty-based loss (Eq. 6). The ground truth binary
label in this example is 1. Hence, the loss is minimised when the network predicts
a high probability and a low uncertainty (point \a"). However, making an incorrect
prediction with a high uncertainty is not penalised as much (point \b"), and is suitable
for cases when the input bags are noisy and the bag-level label is not present in any of
the tubelets. Finally, predicting the incorrect label with a low uncertainty is penalised
the most (point \c"). Best viewed in colour.
likelihood of this occurring is inversely proportional to the ratio of the duration | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
2007.10703 | 16 | the most (point \c"). Best viewed in colour.
likelihood of this occurring is inversely proportional to the ratio of the duration
of the labelled action to the total video length. Secondly, in a weakly-supervised
scenario, we use person detectors that are not trained on the video dataset of
interest. Consequently, there can be failures in the detector, especially when
there is a large domain gap between the detector's training distribution and the
video dataset. False negatives (missing detections for people in the scene) are a
particular issue because it is possible that we do not have a single person tubelet
in the bag that corresponds to the labelled action.
Therefore, there are cases when there is no tubelet which actually has the baglevel label. To handle these cases, inspired by [ 22,32], we modify the network to
additionally predict the uncertainty 2RCfor each binary label for all tubelets
in the bag. Intuitively, to minimise the training error, the network can predict the
bag-level label with low uncertainty or it can predict a high uncertainty to avoid
being penalised heavily for noisy bags where the bag-level label is not present in
any of the tubelets. The nal loss, in conjunction with the original cross entropy,
is de ned as:
L(x;y; ) =1 | 2007.10703 | Uncertainty-Aware Weakly Supervised Action Detection from Untrimmed Videos | Despite the recent advances in video classification, progress in
spatio-temporal action recognition has lagged behind. A major contributing
factor has been the prohibitive cost of annotating videos frame-by-frame. In
this paper, we present a spatio-temporal action recognition model that is
trained with only video-level labels, which are significantly easier to
annotate. Our method leverages per-frame person detectors which have been
trained on large image datasets within a Multiple Instance Learning framework.
We show how we can apply our method in cases where the standard Multiple
Instance Learning assumption, that each bag contains at least one instance with
the specified label, is invalid using a novel probabilistic variant of MIL
where we estimate the uncertainty of each prediction. Furthermore, we report
the first weakly-supervised results on the AVA dataset and state-of-the-art
results among weakly-supervised methods on UCF101-24. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.10703 | [
"Anurag Arnab",
"Chen Sun",
"Arsha Nagrani",
"Cordelia Schmid"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | ECCV 2020 | null | cs.CV | 20200721 | 20200721 | [] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.