Review
stringlengths 6
10.3k
| Rating
int64 1
10
|
|---|---|
This picture seems to consist of one long whine that feels interminable. The Hawaaian scenery of lovely, and so is Mila Kunis, but the men, Jason Segel and Russell Brand are both quite unattractive and the girl is a sort of standard pretty. I say skip it. | 1 |
The Marvel universe gets tenser with the most-awaited "Civil War". For what fans clamor to be a storyline that the MCU is building towards, here comes a showdown of Marvel's biggest properties.
"Captain America 3" starts off where "Avengers: Age of Ultron" ended, when the New Avengers, led by Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), are cornered by international concern in response to continuous collateral damage. As a result, a governing act is proposed to the Avengers, fracturing the team to two sides, one led by Rogers and another led by Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.). But when a new threat is on the horizon, the team has to face the repercussions of their brawls.
It is a huge help that the Russo Brothers returned to hold the weights of Marvel's Phase Three, after their spontaneous effort in "The Winter Soldier". Though "Civil War" may not be as solid as its predecessor, it is still a worthy addition to the Avengers storyline and Captain America's saga. Yet, it excels for taking a mature route that brings a compelling character study, a token from the first Avengers movie. Out of such character study is the major theme of vengeance. I am not going to give any more details about it. It is best to be seen and be enamored by how such themes are delivered with an affecting yet entertaining vibe.
Kudos to the cast ensemble that all brought their A-game, even though some characters are not that fleshed out, or feeling shoehorned. Evans is at his most moving as the fading patriot who wishes the best for his team and loved ones. Downey Jr. is still what we expected from RDJ. Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow has a neutral but affectionate presence, despite her rather little involvement. The rest of the cast is great to see, with notable breakout performances from Paul Rudd as Scott Lang/Ant-Man/Giant-Man, Chadwick Boseman as T'Challa/Black Panther and Tom Holland as Spider-Man/Peter Parker. And Daniel Bruhl as Helmut Zemo is a better addition to Marvel's lacking lineup of antagonists. But despite the cast's collective efforts, there is an obvious battle for screen time with all characters. Thankfully, it was all salvaged as the two parties brawl in a cleared airport, in an exhilarating action sequence that will surely make every audience member cheer.
For all the makings of a summer blockbuster, "Captain America: Civil War" gets it all started right. Besides being a loyal companion to the comic book storyline, it is a worthy setup to Marvel's other properties and one that truly can hold on its own, courtesy of its consistent superhero action scenes, the Russo brothers' tense direction, the excellent cast, its thought-provoking themes and its exciting story with its signature Marvel snappy dialogue. Let us hope for the best for MCU's future, including Tom Holland's "Spider-Man". | 9 |
Let me get this out of the way first: I loved the first film. In fact, for this one I had high hopes especially since we were finally dealing with Moriarty.
This film severely disappointed me. The story was disjointed, and there was no clear direction of that story until the very end. They used their iconic cinematography, wild action scenes, and silly humour to carry the film nowhere to the point that both my friend and I were actually bored of it. And that, unfortunately killed the ending for us during which we did not care at all for the characters nor for what kind of ending the film carried. I never read any original Sherlock stories, but I found that Robert's portrayal, though well acted, was excessively "OCD" and "insane" - far more than the first film.
I'll be honest - I far more enjoyed Brent Spiner and his co-star portraying these characters on Star Trek the Next Generation than this film. | 4 |
This was my first bollywood movie (technically second, but the first one was unwatchable) and it did not disappoint! Everything was stellar, the acting, the cinematography, the music was pretty dope throughout! I know bollywood by reputation, and this movie has none of its traits. I'm not going to say it's a masterpiece, 8.2 is still an inflated score, but you will not be bored for 2 minutes in this 5h20m colossus, and in my book it is because of that unmatched by any other mafia film ever made. The Godfather is a snooze fest, and Scorsese's movies, while fantastic in their own rights, still had a lot of dead air. This is pure, undistilled action and just thinking about what it took to film all of it makes me a bit nauseous. Kudos just for that. I'm not even that big of a fan of action, I'm just perplexed by the sheer feat of achieving that! Story is engaging, characters are relatable, even though they're all complete REDACTED (another feat unto itself) and while the events aren't completely true, I still love learning the actual history that inspired them, similar, perhaps not coincidentally, to Gangs of New York. | 8 |
The opening is solid and promises a fast paced, cleverly laid out plot with unique characters and a long-term payoff: the reveal of a secret character. What follows sure is fast paced but also laughable in terms of character building and cleverness. Take for instance the final twist, the chararcter reveal: it brags about how insanely clever it is while completely ignoring that it forgot the setup to the payoff. The setup to the main plot point! But it's by no means the only one lacking foreshadowing or at least coherence. Twists and reveals are thematically particularily interesting in a piece on stage magic, but most of the turns come out of complete nowhere, defy any logic and sometimes even invalidate previously, apparently carefully established plot points. Another symptom of this sickness are the "magic tricks", that in a number of cases are just flatout high fantasy literal magic, sometimes poorly explained by throwaway lines or just dumped on the viewer in the hope that the insane frequence of plot turns won't leave any time to ask questions. The characters also fall victim to missing foresight: the initially very intriguing mystery about the four horsemen and their final motivation actually never gets lifted and leaves them as ultimately mindless plot devices. As a result, the amount of cringe in the final two scenes that this mess of a plot culminates in is simply awe-inducing.
There could have been a world of trickery and deception to be playfully explored in the context of professional magicians, but all the movie does is throw the viewer a ton of impossible to chew bones and require them to swallow those with next to no help. All the while bathing itself in its aura of self-proclaimed genius. | 3 |
I hadn't seen this movie in a while, probably since Civil War came out and I forgot how amazing this movie. The Russo brothers crafted a tight script and made one of the best spy-thrillers probably since Casino Royale or the good Bourne movies.
This has everything you could ever want from a Marvel movie. Superb action, so well choreographed and fully realized. The story is dripping with mystery and feels exactly like a spy drama, but with the added Marvel flair for action. It vastly improves on Black Widow's character as she wasn't fully realized yet in IM3 or Avengers, but also add a Falcon that is realistic and not in red & white spandex.
The cinematography in this one is stellar and easily the best in the MCU. It just feels so different from any of the others. It matches the spy drama with cool blues and greys. This is probably the only MCU movie of them all that I could see being in my top 10 movies of all time. For the most part I enjoy them all. Some more than others, some are just pure entertainment and fun to enjoy, but The Winter Soldier is something above that and on whole new level.
It'd probably be overkill to compare this as "The Dark Knight" of the MCU, but it's pretty damn close. It's almost TDK with CGI action and over the top set pieces, rather than the stellar practical effects and solid action sequences. It's like a more comic-esque version of TDK.
Everything about this movie just feels so goddamn great. I like it a little better than Civil War overall, but this and Civil War are pretty much the perfect Marvel movies. Civil War expands on The Winter Soldier and incorporates Bucky into the story so well that even comic diehards probably don't care that it doesn't follow the comic book story. The Russo's have made the best three Marvel movie in the MCU and it's gonna be hard for anyone to top them. Here's hoping Endgame continues their perfect streak in the MCU. | 10 |
What ever brought this movie its Palm and its Oscar, I couldn't find it on the screen, and no I am not offended, neither by its story nor its violence. Try to catch Harold Pinters/Joseph Losey's The Servant (1963) starring Dirk Bogarde and you'll Se a similar theme screened in perfection, with better actors and a much better camera work. Sorry, | 6 |
Season 4 was better than the ridiculous Season 3 and Season 2 ending. Eventhough this final season started really bad, it got better and the final few episodes were actually okay. I love these characters because of the excellent first season. The remaining 3 seasons had stuffs which didn't make any sense and which we couldn't just digest but when the push comes to shove, it's not very bad. I'm giving this 8 stars because how much I loved the first season and that season's Hannah Baker, Clay Jensen and all other characters will always have a place in my heart. This is the first series I have ever seen when it first got released in 2017 and this series I'll definitely will miss these characters. | 8 |
The idea of a young teenager being able to transform into an adult superhero allows for a unique take on the highly explored superhero genre. However, I do wish it focused a little more on this concept instead of the traditional hero origin story.
Zachary Levi is able to capture a young person's mannerisms and personality, while the character attempts to maintain an adult superhero façade. It is fun to see this protagonist explore this mystical scenario alongside his friend. After this section of the film is done, it falls more into the traditional hero must defeat villain type scenario which was less fun.
I also wish the designs of the seven deadly sins characters were a bit more creative. They all seemed to blend into one instead of being visually distinct. Overall this is a fun film, but it could have benefited from more deviation from the standard superhero narrative! | 6 |
Tried watching this and gave up after an hour into it. No plot; just a montage of concert scenes, make out scenes, and conversation. | 5 |
Generic introductions, not bad at all, just generic and simple. Several storylines and was surprised they were connected pretty early on, along with the characters; I loved that it built up genuine suspense with the narration instead of just dragging the story or keeping details hidden. It got a lot of laughs in the theatre so a great watch with friends. It's just as much a comedy as it is a whodunnit. Still as fun as the first knives out, if not more.
A little disappointed Bautista went back to playing a tough meat head for humor; I think it's always a miscast but this is one of the better ones, just annoying to see him unutilised instead of roles like See. Ethan hawk cameo was great, not to take anything away from the rest of the movie but it was my favorite bit. The rest of the cast was still decently star studded. Pacing changes and lost some thrill in the second act but builds it back up. Also had a few things are conviniently connected for plots sake but not entirely sensible.
The story's still the best part of course. I loved the twists and turns, every time something was revealed, there was more still coming and at some point there's a bombardment of them. It's pretty entertaining movie, both fun and funny and definitely a worthy sequel to the first. | 8 |
" MUST WATCH "
Everyone's contribution is the key for the success of this movie... Thriller ! Thriller ! Thriller... Can't guess what next... Christopher character is the key ! Congrats to whole team.... Very nice movie | 10 |
Right from the beginning I was hoping it will get better soon .. Believe me after ep5 things will make sense ...show will get better after each episode And you will find everything connected ... Ending is perfect ...last episode is fill with thriller action and drama I enjoyed what i paid for ... | 9 |
To start off with the positive, I feel this film features a good cast of interesting and likable characters, interesting action and visual effects, and a story which is compelling and human despite the unusual setting (much of which takes place in a number of distinct dream worlds). Indeed, the movie features two central stories with emotional resonance, one regarding the tortured relationship of the main character Cobb (DiCaprio) with the memory of his late wife Mal (Cotillard), and the relationship of the industrial magnate Fischer (Murphy) with his seemingly distant and recently-deceased father. Cobb's assistant Arthur (Gordon-Levitt) especially shines in wildly creative scenes inside a dream-world where gravity has been suspended, and the young architect Ariadne (Page) serves the story well in two ways, both as an outsider to the world of dream thievery whose training helps to explain the premise of the movie to the audience, and as a person curious to get at the root of Cobb's relationship with Mal.
The title "Inception" refers to the idea of implanting a thought in the dreaming mind of another person, and the central plot concerns a thought which the industrialist Saito (Watanabe) wants planted in the mind of Fischer, causing Fischer to break up his father's holdings. Members of Cobb's team seem skeptical about the feasibility of planting such a thought, but Cobb's tortured past has shown him that such inception is indeed possible. Powerfully motivated by the desire to see his children in America again, but constrained by authorities who believe he played a role in the death of his wife, Cobb agrees to help Saito because the latter can pull strings to get Cobb back to his home. As Ariadne discovers, though, Cobb's relationship with Mal ~ which remains very much alive in Cobb's subconscious ~ is a powerful danger to everyone who joins him in the mission.
So the film does deliver on many levels, with good action, good characters, and a story compelling both intellectually and emotionally. However, I do feel the movie dragged in spots, ironically because overdoses of action can slow down a movie rather than help the pace. Also, despite the fact that the movie is largely about dreams, I felt that the dreams weren't very dreamlike. Part of that can be explained by Cobb's use of the architect Ariadne to construct settings for the dreams, but real dreams arise from a non-logical place in the brain, and I think anyone who has kept a dream journal can attest that real dreams have a surreal quality quite unlike the real world. That isn't to say that the dream worlds of "Inception" aren't spectacular in their own way, but I felt the dream worlds of this movie had more in common with the alternate reality of the Matrix in the "Matrix" movies than any dreams I've ever experienced. As in the Matrix, the Inception dreams present a world where physical laws can be bent or broken (to the advantage of skilled and knowledgeable people who are aware of the true nature of the world), but I suppose I was looking for more crazy, unexpected, non-logical content in the dreams. Since the movie is already challenging to follow, such content might make the movie too inaccessible to most audiences, but I still felt the director could have done more to cultivate a bizarre and dreamlike atmosphere.
Still, all factors considered, I felt this was certainly a good movie at the very least, and probably worth your time if you're thinking about seeing it. | 7 |
I watched this film last night and I can guarantee that it is simply extraordinary. This film talks about races, religion, friendship, commitment, but especially about of the love and the pride by the principles and values that as human beings never we can lose. Love and respect for the people is over the religions, beliefs and rules of the societies. Every day I am surprised more about the quality of the content and the action of the Indian films. This film will touch your heart and your soul. You will laugh and cry and something different you feel in soul after this movie. There are scenes of unjust deaths, hatred and friendship between people of different beliefs and races that will make us reflect on the prejudices that we have on people, religions and countries. | 10 |
It saddened me that it was so short! Can't wait until season 2 | 9 |
Wt* why uts have a 8 rating? I mean the story character and place is good, but there alot of nonesanse in the film itself like how people actually easily misunderstanding something (well i got it but seriously ? The dialogue seems so dumb to me), and the timeline actually only one (i actually don't mind but again the lack of teory and stuff ruin the over all movie performance)... There actually few more nonesase that make overall good acting good story ruined.... I mean its deserve 6.6 or 7.5 but not 8 up... Well that my pov... | 8 |
This was one of the poorest, most awful films I've seen in years. I blame the director and whomever hired this mess of actors. It was just a disaster, so disappointing. | 3 |
Fargo is rightly named one of the best movies of the 90's. Featuring some outstanding performances, a great script and some beautiful cinematography. Frances McDormand rightly earned herself the Oscar for Best Actress portraying Marge Gunderson, chief of Brainerd police.
Jerry Lundegaard (William H. Macy) is facing financial troubles. He concocts a scheme to get more money to support a new project he is undertaking. Jerry hires two men (Steve Buscemi and Peter Stormare) to kidnap his wife so he can get his rich father in law (Harve Presnell) to pay the ransom of $1,000,000. Unfortunately things get way out of hand.
Fargo is a movie everyone needs to see. It is a mixture of many things. Crime, comedy, thriller, drama and romance. The screenplay is witty and packs many delights along the way. All the performances are perfect in this movie. The movies also is extremely true to life. The characters are not overdone or inhuman. Nothing seems unrealistic. If I were to name anything wrong with this movie it would be that it was too short. I really wanted it to continue on.
4½/5. | 9 |
To say season 5 was a little disappointing is an understatement for 2 reasons. Firstly there is only 3 episodes and second I don't know if it is just me but the episodes seem to be aimed at a younger audience, comparing to the last four seasons content I was expecting more. | 9 |
Worst show.... I think matvel is finished with tony stark.... They want to create new captain America so they launched 6 episodes of falcon n winter soldier....wtf...ultimately loki is the worst show ever. | 1 |
Title: Misa Amane: The Unparalleled Brilliance of Death Note's Greatest Character
Introduction
In the realm of manga and anime, Death Note stands as a masterpiece, captivating audiences with its intricate plot, complex characters, and moral dilemmas. Among the myriad of characters that populate this dark and thrilling narrative, Misa Amane emerges as a beacon of brilliance, making a compelling case for her status as the greatest character in Death Note. This review aims to explore the multifaceted nature of Misa's character, examining her contributions to the storyline, her psychological depth, and the unique qualities that set her apart from other characters in the series.
Chapter I: The Enigma of Misa Amane
At first glance, Misa Amane may seem like a stereotypical idol, defined solely by her stunning looks and pop-star persona. However, as Death Note unfolds, it becomes evident that Misa is far more than meets the eye. She is a complex and enigmatic character, shrouded in layers of mystery that beg to be unraveled.
Misa's introduction into the narrative is marked by tragedy, as her parents fall victim to a murderer targeted by the Death Note. This tragic event serves as the catalyst for her involvement with the Death Note and her subsequent entanglement with Light Yagami, the story's protagonist and antagonist. Misa's unwavering devotion to Kira, the alias adopted by Light, raises questions about the nature of justice, morality, and the consequences of wielding the power of life and death.
Chapter II: Devotion and Sacrifice
One of the most defining aspects of Misa's character is her unwavering devotion to Light Yagami. Her love for him is both a source of strength and vulnerability, driving her actions throughout the series. Misa's sacrifice for Light's cause is evident in her willingness to trade half of her lifespan for the power of the Death Note and the Shinigami eyes, a testament to the depths of her commitment.
This sacrifice not only underscores Misa's loyalty but also highlights the moral ambiguity that pervades Death Note. The juxtaposition of Misa's actions with the broader ethical questions posed by the Death Note forces audiences to confront the blurred lines between good and evil. Misa's sacrifice challenges traditional notions of heroism and villainy, adding layers of complexity to the narrative.
Chapter III: Psychological Depth and Complexity
In the pantheon of Death Note characters, Misa Amane stands out for the psychological depth and complexity woven into her character arc. Her bubbly and seemingly carefree exterior conceals a tortured soul grappling with the weight of her actions. Misa's internal struggles, particularly her awareness of Light's manipulations and the toll of her relentless pursuit of justice, showcase the intricacies of her character.
The psychological turmoil Misa experiences is further exacerbated by her encounters with the Shinigami Rem, who becomes emotionally entangled in Misa's fate. The interplay between Misa, Light, and Rem delves into themes of morality, manipulation, and the consequences of playing god. Misa's character serves as a vehicle for exploring the human psyche under the influence of absolute power, offering viewers a poignant reflection on the fragility of the human spirit.
Chapter IV: Misa's Role in the Narrative
Beyond her personal struggles, Misa plays a pivotal role in advancing the overarching narrative of Death Note. Her interactions with other key characters, such as L and Near, inject a dynamic energy into the storyline. Misa's involvement becomes a catalyst for unforeseen twists and turns, keeping the audience on the edge of their seats.
Misa's interactions with L, the brilliant detective pitted against Light, create moments of tension and suspense. Her role as a key player in the cat-and-mouse game between Light and L adds layers of complexity to the plot, as her actions and decisions become instrumental in shaping the direction of the narrative. Misa's unpredictability and the emotional depth she brings to the story contribute significantly to Death Note's enduring appeal.
Chapter V: Feminism and Misa Amane
Misa Amane's character also opens a dialogue on feminist themes within the context of Death Note. While initially appearing as a stereotypical "girly-girl" idol, Misa defies conventional gender roles through her agency and determination. Her unapologetic pursuit of Light, her sacrifices for her ideals, and her refusal to conform to societal expectations challenge traditional portrayals of women in anime.
Furthermore, Misa's character arc prompts discussions on agency and autonomy. Despite being entangled in a web of manipulation and supernatural forces, Misa actively makes choices that shape the narrative. Her decisions, even when influenced by external factors, highlight the complexity of agency and the ways in which individuals navigate the constraints imposed upon them.
Chapter VI: Misa's Legacy and Impact
Death Note has left an indelible mark on the anime and manga landscape, and Misa Amane's character has played a crucial role in shaping the series' legacy. Her impact extends beyond the confines of the story, influencing discussions on morality, justice, and the consequences of absolute power. Misa's legacy lies not only in her role as a character within the Death Note universe but also in the thought-provoking questions she raises about the human condition.
Conclusion
In the grand tapestry of Death Note, Misa Amane stands as a character of unparalleled depth, complexity, and significance. Her unwavering devotion, psychological struggles, and pivotal role in the narrative contribute to the series' enduring appeal. Misa transcends the boundaries of traditional character archetypes, challenging audiences to reconsider their preconceptions and engage with the profound themes embedded in Death Note. As the greatest character in Death Note, Misa Amane leaves an indelible imprint on the hearts and minds of those who have experienced the captivating world of Light Yagami, the Death Note, and the enigmatic idol whose brilliance shines brightly amid the shadows. | 9 |
I wish the multiverse actually existed because that would mean there's a universe out there where I didn't see this movie.
I used to think Sam Raimi was hard done by because he didn't get to Spider-Man 3 the way he wanted. Now I know it's because he's literally insane.
This movie served no purpose. | 2 |
It turned to be a great show with great graphics and ICG but the acting is super weak | 8 |
This movie storyline was extremely dull and completely discombobulated from start to finish. I'm a fan of all of Tarantino's films. This one doesn't make it. 2 people fell asleep and started snoring around me. It was that hard to watch. The only interesting moments were the last 15minutes of the film. | 3 |
Captain America The Winter Soldier seamlessly utilizes umber of innovative techniques to create a film that seems to seamlessly merge the real world with the fictitious Marvel Cinematic Universe. Using the "political thriller" genre for the basis of this movie proved to be very successful as it help give the story that relatable, realistic factor that the first movie lacked. The different approach that the director's took with Captain America also helped elevate not only the movie, but also the status of the Super Soldier himself. The deciding factor that puts this movie above other typical superhero movies is its villain. The Winter Soldier was a perfect choice for the villain, an helped introduce the more darker tone that most Marvel movies lack. However, Captain America The Winter Soldier does have its fair share of cons, with the movie at times being a little to cliché, but overall, it still manages to prevail as one of the best action movies of all time. | 9 |
This movie reminds me of modern fine art. Everyone knows it's absolute crap deep down and it takes far less talent than traditional art where an actual skill set had to be built up over years to make something look photorealistic or depict some religious scene. People will pay millions for trash modern art in attempt to seem unique.
EEAAO is akin to a Jackson Pollock painting. Some weirdo who thought he/she was really creative just flung "artistic" poo at the wall in a really weird way. The poo happened to align with tHe mEssAge somewhat so Hollywood began drooling all over it.
A few years from now absolutely no one will even remember this B-movie garbaggio that tricked a few drama nerds into caring about it. | 2 |
Good Plot, bad execution...
I went with high expectations after reading all the great reviews. In fact, movie indeed starts on a high note which further raises expectations. Unfortunately, "Now You See Me" fails miserably after first half and director seems to had no clue how to end this movie so he turns four smart magicians who did great in their first performance and police interrogations into four ordinary criminals that runaway after their second performance..Phew! I realized, movie was going down-south from this point and it indeed never recovered.
I am not saying that the movie was bad, but if you go with high expectations, you will be disappointed. It's easy to build expectations with cast like Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine, one of them had literally no role.
Go with low expectations and keep your brain at home and probably you will enjoy it more. | 5 |
Is the movie pretty (well shot, decent cinematography, believable CGI)? Yes. Are the individual acting performances decent? Yes. Is the music and sound design good? Yes.
Is the science sound and explained? No. Is the science fiction good and elaborated on? No. Was a physics term used to explain away the entire phenomena, even though it makes no sense in context and does not even account for all the other mysterious occurrences that have nothing to do with that term? Yes.
For such a potentially "annihilating" phenomenon, are we shown any evidence of sufficient effort by the authorities to solve/contain it? No. Is there any explanation why a hybrid team of academics and military personal cannot be sent? No. Do the "scientists" behave like normal adults, much less professionals? No. Do the team members behave like emotional suicidal teenagers? Yes.
Are there numerous unexplained and therefore irrelevant plot devices? Yes. Is the setting near the epicentre of the phenomena logical or explained? No.
Is the ending "climax" illogical, ham-fisted, and banal? Yes. Is the scenario settled in an improbable, accidentally convenient manner? Yes.
Is the movie either scary, thrilling, funny, dramatic, suspenseful, or exciting? No. Do many of the highly rated reviews seem suspect? Yes. Will I ask my friends to stay away from this movie? Yes. | 2 |
This series centres on the idea that technology can backfire on us. It's a horrifying series to watch as viewers can somehow relate to some of the scenarios portrayed in the series. As this is a show that does not follow a continuous narrative, not every episode is made equal. There are some pretty underwhelming episodes, for instance the one featuring Miley Cyrus (controversial as I may be in saying this). I saw someone else say this and I will agree, there is an episode for everyone in this show. The acting, direction and casting are top notch overall and you'll see quite a few familiar faces. Check it out! | 8 |
The words "Christopher Nolan" and "disappointment" are not words I would naturally associate
but for me, they apply where "Dunkirk" is concerned.
It promised so much from the trailer: a historical event of epic proportions; Kenneth Branagh; Tom Hardy; Mark Rylance; Hans Zimmer on the keys; the director of such classics as "The Dark Knight"; "Inception" and "Interstellar" : what could go wrong?
But it just doesn't work and I've spent the last 24 hours trying to unpick why.
A key problem for me was the depiction of the beach itself. The film eschews CGI effects (which I would normally commend) in favour of the use of "practical effects" and the involvement of "thousands of extras" (as the rather glutinously positive Wiki entry declares). Unfortunately for the movie, there were some 400,000 troops marooned in this last patch of civilisation ahead of the Nazi hoard, and all of the shots refuse to acknowledge this scale of potential human tragedy. Yes, there are individual scenes of horror, such as the soldier walking into the sea against the impassive stares of the young heroes. But nothing of scale. At times I thought I'd seen more people on the beach on a winter's day in Bournemouth.
My disquiet at this deepened when we got to the sharp end of the rescue by the "small boats". In my mind (and I'm NOT quite old enough to remember this!) I imagine a sea full of them. A sight to truly merit Branagh's awed gaze. But no. They might have been "original" vessels
. but there was only about half a dozen of them. A mental vision dashed.
The film attempts to tell the story from three perspectives: from the land; from the sea and from the air. The sea though gets the lion's share of the film, and there is much drowning that occurs that (I am aware) was distressing for some in the audience.
Nolan also pushes his quirky "timeline" manipulation too far for an audience that largely expects a linear telling of a classic tale. It's day; it's night; the minesweeper's sailing; then sunk; then sailing again; a Spitfire crashes, then crashes again from a different perspective. I know many in the audience just didn't 'get' that: leaving them presumably very confused!
That being said, the film is not a write off, and has its moments of brilliance. Kenneth Branagh ("Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit", "Valkyrie"), although having a range of Nolan's cheesy lines to say, is impressive as the commanding officer. Mark Rylance ("Bridge of Spies", "The BFG") also shines as the captain of the "Moonstone": one of the small boats out of Weymouth. And Tom Hardy ("The Revenant", "Legend"), although having limited opportunity to act with anything other than his eyes, is impressive as RAF pilot Farrier. His final scene of stoic heroism is memorable.
Fionn Whitehead is also impressive in his movie debut, and even Harry Styles ("This is Us") equips himself well.
The cinematography by Hoyte Van Hoytema ("Interstellar") is stunning with some memorable shots: a burning plane on a beach being a high spot for me.
And Hans Zimmer's score is Oscar-worthy, generating enormous tension with a reverberating score, albeit sometimes let down by unsuitable cutaways (for example, to scenes of boat loading). Elsewhere in the sound department though I had major issues, with a decent percentage of the dialogue being completely inaudible in the sound mix.
I really wanted this to be a "Battle of Britain". Or a "Bridge Too Far". Or even a "Saving Private Ryan". Unfortunately, for me it was none of these, and this goes down as one of my movie disappointments of the year so far.
(For the full graphical review, please visit bob-the-movie-man.com. Thanks.) | 5 |
Things blowing up with slow motion cutting into every scene and about 10 songs within the first 5 mins to fill the void for lack of dialogue. This thing is a serious train wreck. I feel bad for Deadpool. Netflix just took $150 Mil and flushed it down a toilet | 1 |
I'll be brief and to the point: As can be exited - the production, special effects, and crew is impressive. But the content is pretty shallow. A messed-up Greek theology that presents Gal Gadot as a goddess. And subsequently, most of her acting is computer aided (CGI). Bottom line: shallow content plus too much CGI equals disappointment. | 2 |
Actually, I expected more. I love when the hero works hard, but the chain of events is slow and there are events that can be dispensed with. You can have fun but don't take it too seriously | 7 |
This movie is almost perfect . The cinematography and editing and choreography of action are top-notch. Director did a good job performing and executing the shots . the whole movie was just epic. I love the emotional aspect with his daughter that was very beautiful to see on big screen | 9 |
The story is really pathetic - but that is a now a given when you make a movie from a comic for under-10 years old :(
The science is non-existent.
The logic is mostly absent.
The most surprising part of the story is about how the entire movie is a huge scare that poor people want class warfare and other similar brainwashing techniques that are frequently seen in right-wing propaganda movies.
There was only one remotely interesting / unexpected twist (but very remotely), without that the story would have been a total zero.
Special effects go from acceptable / good to rather bad / gratuitous at times.
Acting was not as bad as was expecting, and the distribution could have provided better results with a better story.
Overall a movie that I will probably never see for the second time. | 4 |
I am astonished by the so many positive comments on this tv series. I agree that the acting, the photography and the music are good and you can easily end up watching all the episodes because of this, but the screenplay and the story itself give the same emotions you may probably have by reading an article from a tabloid. There are all the ingredients to appeal readers of the Sun or the Mirror here, from the numerous nudes and sex scenes to the stupid dialogues. The psychological study of the characters is very basic and their emotions are expressed in a language which doesn't seem to match their ability and success at university. Is this the representation of the inability of communication that Antonioni was masterfully showing in his movies? Mmmm sorry, but not really... to me Normal People was just average. | 2 |
Until now, the Annabelle doll was the most profitable derivative of The Conjuring for New Line Cinema, the arm of Warner Bros. With yet another movie in the account, "Annabelle Comes Home" has the challenge of avoiding the wear of the character as a scary antagonist and continuing to attract viewers. Screenwriter Gary Dauberman (It - 2017) takes the reins of the sequel, makes his directorial debut giving a different tone to the franchise and gets a gratifying respite for the demonic doll story.
Paranormal investigators Ed (Patrick Wilson, "Insidious - 2010") and Lorraine Warren (Vera Farmiga, "Up In The Air - 2009") serve as distinguished hosts to introduce the plot. It begins immediately after the prologue to "Invocation of Evil", when the couple brings the cursed doll home "for safety". They lock her in a special box inside a room, where they already keep a huge collection of sinister artifacts collected over her career in confronting spirits. Message is given: Annabelle is the most dangerous of objects because she has the power to attract evil entities like a great beacon. The film's conflicts come a year later, when the couple leave their ten-year-old daughter, Judy (Mckenna Grace, "Captain Marvel"), in the care of nanny Mary Ellen (Madison Iseman, "Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle") and, of course, the doll manages to escape.
Unlike what one might assume, Annabelle is not a possessed puppet like Chucky who goes out to kill for perversity. It functions as a conduit for the real dangers beyond. These yes come thirsty for possessing human bodies and stealing souls. When Mary Ellen's friend Daniela (Katie Sarife, from the series "Youth & Consequences"), manages to enter the "warehouse" of the Warrens, she unintentionally releases not only the doll and the malicious entity that comes through her, but several other horrifying beings ready to strike terror into the house. The girls then have to deal with a phantom werewolf, a murderous bride, Annabelle's little friends and a handful of creatures from the worst nightmares.
Acting as a horror film that does not exclusively cater to fans of the James Wan universe, Annabelle Comes Home is a visually and narratively interesting production well-conceived as a dramatic path of characters secure in their social (religion) and psychological convictions (faith). The delicious and infamous use of jump scare is still a very present feature in the sound mix signed by Robert Sharman, but unlike some other films in the franchise, it doesn't appear as a crutch to support narrative of a too weak story, as happened with the cinematographic aberration that was the first damn doll movie.
Annabelle's evil is released for reasons that, if seemingly preposterous at first, are sufficiently justified shortly thereafter, subverting some of the expectations by bringing some emotional depth to the occasion. As the Warren's daughter Judy (McKenna Grace), her nanny Mary Ellen (Madison Iseman) and friend Daniela (Katie Sarife) face the doll-influenced spirits, other small arches are rescued and incorporated, such as the crush Bob (Michael) Cimino), comic relief of the time. The first half of the film is perhaps the most successful for defying the conventions of what is expected from a film with this brand. The intro promises a scare that doesn't come, and in it the sudden appearances are not accompanied by accented sounds. In the Warren house, tension builds through the silence as the nanny and her friend walk through the rooms, and at the end of these silences there is... more silence. When there is a scare, it comes at an unexpected and conquered moment.
In his directorial debut, Dauberman does not display an extravagant performance, but shows talent in his restraint, not always wanting to emulate James Wan's floating camera and focusing on the careful composition of frames in order to enhance the small spaces of the house. There is enough negative space in each frame to keep the viewer analyzing their surroundings, waiting for some apparition at the end of a room or a hallway, without needing more elaborate camera tricks. The director uses this expectation to create an atmosphere of tension in place of cheap awe, raising the quality of the horror. The director is aware of clichés and sought opportunities to pervert them with a script that is smarter than formulas. When the viewer thinks they already know what is going to happen in a scene, something not so expected happens and keeps the suspense longer. The shiver comes from the camera play and from the elements placed in the frame at calculated moments. In addition to easter eggs from the franchise itself, Gary also plants references to classics by Tobe Hooper and tales by Stephen King to enrich the film.
Finally, it is human motivations and very identifiable themes such as bullying, mourning and teenage tacky that fill the emotional fabric of the film, especially thanks to the surprising performances of Mckenna Grace and Katie Sarife. Her Judy and Daniela bring an unexpected depth to the genre. On the other hand, supernatural characters do what they want, whenever they want, and the script doesn't bother to explain anything that makes sense of the hauntings other than torment (coordinately) the living.
With so many threats that finally escape the Warren's basement, and although the scale of events here is limited to a single house, the succession of frights follows a similar logic to these movies, prioritizing entertainment over internal coherence among the evil entities, which follow their own concepts. If on the one hand this unpretentiousness allows for a wide variety of scares and creative ideas, putting the viewer in a position of uncertainty as to what will come next, the frenzied nature of terror prevents each of the entities from being better developed, not just the limits amusement park monsters as it makes the film's unravel a little too random for its own good - monsters appear and disappear for no apparent reason.
As the script also introduces several entities, these could not but be inconsistent with each other as to the idealization and its realization on screen. In terms of aesthetics, the best of them are easily the Boatman, a reaper with coins over his eyes, and Annabelle herself, whose inner demon manifests itself in a fascinating way, in a tense scene with a lamp with colored filters that, when alternated, gradually reveal their true form. The Infernal Dog, who is just a typical werewolf, appears in cartoonish CGI effects that make him much less threatening than even those seen in Goosebumps feature films and series, working better when hidden or in humorous occasions - as in Bob scene in the chicken coop. The cursed wedding dress, meanwhile, is basically a mix of the Nun and La Llorona, and appears in the plot only to create an inconvenience for the protagonists in their final act. The lack of effect of entities on the narrative told here is highlighted by the hasty conclusion, far less climatic than one would expect from this premise.
If, on the one hand, everything was resolved quickly and made the plot a little fast-paced, Annabelle 3 is not a dull or tiring film, which ends up making up for this deficiency. Normally, in remarkably successful horror material, we can use the expression "breathtaking" or "shuddering" and that, unfortunately, cannot be said about this film. With wrong production decisions, Annabelle 3 is not a scary movie and can be ridiculed at times. However, thanks to the cast holding the ends, it entertains.
Gary Dauberman, already known for writing Annabelle 2:Creation and The Nun, may have been marked by his not-so-good exploits in the aforementioned features. However, his work on Annabelle 3 is surprising and surreal. The film managed to bring, right from the start, the tension that surrounds Ed and Lorraine Warren in relation to the evil spirits they fight, mixed with the need to try to guess where the scares will happen so that you are prepared. Between jokes and relaxed moments, Annabelle 3 works a lot for its main function: jump scares. Unlike the other doll movies, the third feature of the terrifying play manages to make you totally taken by surprise in parts that you don't imagine it will happen. It is the surprise element of the film that this third chapter of Annabelle stands out.
The different and fun setups and payoffs that the script sets up when introducing details that are initially insignificant, but which have importance later in the plot, deserve to be highlighted. This is a generally difficult technique to perform, and what stands out in "Annabelle 3" is the number of times it is used. In addition, sound editing as a narrative element is memorable, from the attenuation of doors and walls to the almost imperceptible layer of low frequencies, like an insistent hum that gives away the presence of spirits. Also notice how the noise that comes out of a samurai armor at a certain moment is capable of creating practically a second movie in the viewers' imagination.
For daring to build a different climate by bringing new elements to the franchise, "Annabelle Comes Home" surprises expectations with creativity and great direction. By playing with other terrifying artifacts from the Warrens' collection, the script cleverly plants opportunities for new spin offs, while giving the doll a little respite to avoid public fatigue. Even with the rhythm and a lot of creativity in the dark attacks, the film doesn't shed the weight of being a late addition to the franchise. It's always nice to see Patrick Wilson (Ed Warren) and Vera Farmiga (Lorraine Warren) duo again, but it's hard not to notice the same formula structure that made The Nun and La Llorona such lazy cookie-cutter, raising doubts about how much breath there is left. In all this. | 6 |
The is need of one Charlie in each one's life. I love dogs and the love for dog shown is amazing. A dog really changes your life.one of the best and Emotional movie of my life. Lastly charlie is best actor than NEPOTIZED BOLLYWOOD SO CALLED CHAPRI ACTORS. LOVE U CHARLIE A LOT 1000 TIMES LOVE YOU. | 10 |
Jason Segel is trying to forget his girlfriend who breaks up with him at the very beginning of the flick and forgetting her is what he actually endeavours in the entire movie. Although it isn't as easy as it seems. Every time he tries to get away from her he deliberately ends up getting close to her.
The movie is a comedy and of course a romantic one with a great star cast (most of them are my favourites). Who doesn't love Russell Brand and wait he shows up as Aldous Snow the psychotic singer who is the current boyfriend of Kristen Bell. Mila Kunis is a receptionist at Hawaii where Jason Segel goes to mend his broken heart and ends up finding his girlfriend with Aldous Snow, (although I'm pretty sure that was an intentional attempt too). Mila Kunis aids him at the time of need which grabs the attention of Jason who finds her attractive and caring. She dates him (so he says) and starts liking her although he isn't able to move on as Sarah shows up every now and then. This however causes some tension between Mila and Jason which leaves a miffed Mila eventually. Now it is the job of Jason to move on, stop thinking about his ex and make matters straight with Mila Kunis who is in deeply in love with him.
The movie has some great characters like Jonah Hill, Paul Rudd etc. who added flavour to the comedy.
I personally like Jason Segel for his acting and he happens to be one of my favourite actors for the character Marshall Eriksen the one he plays in 'How I met your mother'. I have seen him act in a couple of movies and I must say I am pretty impressed with his comedy. Writing such a wonderful story was in itself a bravado.
Forgetting Sarah Marshal wouldn't disappoint you at all. It is a real good movie and you wouldn't stop laughing as the entire movie rolls on with fun written in every clip. | 7 |
The Greatest Showman is a flashy biopic of circus pioneer PT Barnum. Unfortunately, PT Barnum gets the Hollywood treatment and it is a shallow movie that portrays Barnum as a champion of the downtrodden just as much as the profiteer that he was. Hugh Jackman's version of Barnum would never say "There's a sucker born every minute."
Of even greater disappointment was the music. The writers of La La Land's incredible soundtrack follow it up with a disappointing set of songs that all sound the same. If you shuffled the songs around in this movie, I'm not sure anyone would really notice. The only song I can remember much of is The Greatest Show, and that's just because they repeatedly come back to it. Even Golden Globe nominated This Is Me sounds like the rest of them. It was also clear that for the most part the actors are not the ones singing, and those that are recorded in a studio and then lip synced, which while understandable, should not be noticeable.
There is a solid cast and they all do fine, particularly Jackman and Rebecca Ferguson. The dance numbers definitely feel like they are from a 60s musical like West Side Story or Mary Poppins rather than a modern musical. It is also shot and constructed reasonably well, but it just not gripping. | 5 |
This movie was boring. I do not know what was director / writer trying to tell the audience ? This is not even a good fiction. Just stupidity one after another.. Forced scenes with creature that is completely not believable. I got disappointed and bored in the first 30 minutes alone. | 5 |
When I saw the series , I remembered my childhood and the stories about superheroes, the animated pictures are very colorful and amazing, the story tells us about Aang who developed his skills in bending all the powers that controlls the earth according to the story and according to the ancient Greek philosophy, what astonishing Science fiction story, this teaching our children to make their effort in developing their skills like Aang.
Prince Zuco one of the main characters in our story which is ambitious trying to satisfy his devil father the lord of fire, and discovering the truth throughout his journey to catch Aang turning him from devil to evil and from a bad guy to a wise good king uniting the 4 kingdoms of the world. | 8 |
The writing of the show is juvenile, the director doesn't understand the world of the Witcher and doesn't care to, writers have zero respect for the source material, the clothing design is atrocious, basically they butchered everything that they could get their hands on. Can't recommend watching past season one because that is time you will spend, there's better shows or books or games out there that make this show look like what it exactly is, a show directed and written by people who are not true fantasy fans, everything about this show reveals this, look for something else if you don't want to waste your time with this. | 3 |
I started to watch the show just because of Dan Harmon, as Rick and Morty is one of my favorite shows ever(after the Office). It started pretty fun with the clever jokes, references to pop culture and so on. It wasn't any close to sitcoms we are used to. However, from the second season, these got out of control. Too many references to pop culture, too many fantasy elements, insufficient character (well, they are rather types actually) development (especially for Britta and Annie), Shirley and Pierce are not fitting to the picture enough, the whole study group is not vibing at all (except Troy and Abed), despite all his toxicity, Jeff is being the mvp at the end of each episode and speaking like the wise guy(actually the character is well written and complex, but I think McHale wasn't the one for this role) .. Might be fun for the ones who know all about the American pop culture, enjoying fantasy elements.. But for me it was too much too see in a non-cartoon show, I first time I didn't enjoy an absurd-comedy. Couldn't finish the 4th season. | 6 |
I just think this movie is amazing. The choreography and action sequences are among the best in the MCU, even without using a huge amount of cgi.
Captain America has never been cooler (except for Endgame of course) and this movie is what got me to like Black Widow so much more.
The Winter Soldier is one of the best villains in the MCU, because you fear him and feel for him at the same time. The constant change in directions in regards to who Steve can trust is thrilling and the "on your left" ending is pleasing.
All in all, an incredible movie, among the best sequels (up there with movies such as Empire Strikes Back) and together with the first Iron Man movie probably the best MCU movie that's not an Avengers movie.
9,1/10. | 9 |
One of the overhyped movies for me. It was slow boring annoying at some scenes, and unnecessarily overlong, I felt like they wanted to stuff it with stories & elements more than it should !!!
It was hard for me to follow & to stay focused all along with the plot, I had to stop the movie several times to play with my phone, & check when will it be finished.
I gave this movie 5 for its visuals and for heath ledger's good performance of joker. | 5 |
Anime left the label of low budget syndicated animation--the era of Thundercats--ages ago. It is a visual media art form.
For visual media enthusiasts curious about anime, Attack on Titan is a superb example of the field, and as good a starting point as any for serious explorations.
The most arresting facet of this gem of Japanese animation is the depiction of sunlight. The drawn and colored sunlight is glorious, almost a character in the story unto itself.
And what a worthy story the sunlight joins, a coming-of-age hero's call of a tale that Joseph Campbell would recognize instantly.
The dialogue is rendered in Japanese. The version released to NetFlix mid-2015 has Englisg subtitles. These are unobtrusive and seem to be translated in a natural idiom. The rhythm of the dialogue and the spatial placement of the characters amidst their built environment easily tips to the influence of Kurosawa.
Like so many of the achievements, the artisanal films and series, in the anime oeuvre, Attack on Titan is a labor of love. The product of a group of artists.
Watch it for days on end, or for just a hour or so, and let the sunlight find you. | 9 |
What a hot mess from The opening bell. How this got such hi ratings is a complete mystery. From the first minute you are shrouded in complete confusion. I watched it twice just to make sure I didn't miss something. Nope didn't miss anything except a decent movie. Graphics were good but the story is all over the place. If confusion is what you want,this is perfect for you. 2.5 hours of utter jibber jabber. | 3 |
Margot does the best with what she's given, but this film was very disappointing to me. It was marketed as a fun, quirky satire with homages to other movies. It started that way, but ended with over-dramatized speeches and an ending that clearly tried to make the audience feel something, but left everyone just feeling confused. And before you say I'm a crotchety old man, I'm a woman in my 20s, so I'm pretty sure I'm this movie's target audience. The saddest part is there were parents with their kids in the theater that were victims of the poor marketing, because this is not a kid's movie. Overall, the humor was fun on occasion and the film is beautiful to look at, but the whole concept falls apart in the second half of the film and becomes a pity party for the "strong" woman. | 6 |
I thought this show was really hard to follow and kind of cheesy. I had a lot of trouble telling when events were occurring relative to each other. Do I have to have some understanding of the world they're living in prior to watching the show? Because it seemed like every time there was a new character it felt like I was supposed to know some kind of backstory about them. | 3 |
Ip Man is a heavily fictionalised biopic of the founder of Wing Chun style of Kung Fu and someone who went on to become a mentor to Bruce Lee.
Ip man is a wealthy family man in 1930s China and a reluctant teacher who we see initially combat with his fellow martial art masters from rival schools who want to see for themselves how they are in comparison.
When a rival bully from the north turns up and beats up all the kung fu masters in the town, it is left to Ip man to defend the town's honour as he humiliates the upstart who wants to start his own rival martial arts school.
Once the Japanese invade China, Ip man descends into poverty especially when his wife becomes ill. He gets a labouring job and finds out that other kung fu masters are getting involved in duels with the Japanese platoon for an extra bag of rice. Ip man angrily takes on 10 Japanese soldiers and beats them up when he finds out that one of the kung fu masters was shot dead by one of the soldiers.
This display puts him in a collision course with General Miura, the Japanese's top exponent of karate and the man who organises the combat bouts with the Chinese kung fu masters and wants to prove himself against Ip man.
The film is certainly well made with good production values and art direction. The martial arts does not have the over the top choreography and wire work of many other recent Chinese or Hong Kong films.
There are some references to the Bruce Lee action films such as teaching the factory workers to fight in order to defend themselves against the same bully who beat up all the other kung fu masters.
The film is certainly restrained and lacks the histrionics of other martial art films, even General Miura is portrayed as more honourable than the other Japanese officers.
However it is not a true story. The real Ip man was an opium addict and plagued with money problems. | 6 |
I would compare this movie to the experience of walking through an art gallery. Sometimes it's pretty or well-made. And it apparently has a purpose. But it's just boring.
Pros:
good acting
good writing
Cons:
confusing and jumbled editing
no storyline, conflict, or reason to exist | 6 |
Well shot, well acted, on the surface fun and exciting.
But the plot falls apart on reflection.
Too many plot hole and coincidences. Unrealistic family dynamics. Too much Social Justice. Not enough real justice.
Mostly just an interesting fantasy "concept" meant to make certain minded people feel good, with no real story or depth. | 5 |
Recommending everyone to Watch the first directorial feature of Shekhar Kapoor, Masoom. The story is very emotional as well as very beautiful. The soulful music of R.D.Burman & beautiful lyrics of Gulzar make this film more special.
When the names of Naseeruddin Shah & Shabana Azmi are there then obviously there will be no complain about acting. There are 3 child actors in the film and they acted better than many star kids of today. After searching for the film I came to know that the elder child is none other than Urmila Matondkar | 9 |
I was so looking forward to watching this show, during the second episode I started losing interest, it just turned out to be another social engineering mess, pushing the same NWO propaganda being spewed by most shows and movies these days. | 3 |
I really don't understand how this is worse than the first. It was a great movie. There wasn't as many exciting moments, but you don't always have to have exciting moments to make a movie great as long as it has a great story. This one delivered a great story. What I don't understand why people think it's a "bad idea" for an author like J. K. Rowling to be the one pulling the strings, especially with everything she's been doing to make the Wizarding World bigger and connecting the series to where it makes sense. There were lots of references to Harry Potter that you could go "Oh! That's in Harry Potter and the such and such!" The characters are interesting, including younger Dumbledore and Grindelwald, and I feel that Jude Law and Johnny Depp fit the roles really well. I also don't understand why it's the people that either hate the Harry Potter books/movies, or are just not into it, see movies like this and say it's horrible. If you're not into it, that's fine but don't ruin it for those that are really into the series. As a Harry Potter fan, I thoroughly enjoyed it, and I'm sure many other fans will too. This mover deserves better than just a 7.0 | 7 |
Will I remember this and want to watch it over and over again? No. But for 2 hours this kept us very engaged and on the edge of our seat. Great acting, actions, location, and ending. It's the simple things that if done well make for a great experience. This move was just that. | 7 |
The old-school Hollywood team, the Reel Geezers on YouTube give a great review of Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Their opposing viewpoints makes you think about the film and the current state of comedy in film. They have much to say about the role of women in comedy and about Judd Apatow's style. They discuss past comedies and the specific characters in the film. You will come away with a something to think about after watching their reviews. Their blunt honesty about the film and its devices is refreshing and an often unheard perspective when it comes to movie reviews. Check out their dialog on YouTube go to Reel Geezers or the direct link to Forgetting Sarah Marshall http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBD8m1m9vOk | 7 |
The only good actor and reason this movie is good is Chris Hemsworth. A lot of unrealistic action and over exaggeration (wonder where they got that from). | 6 |
Nice very nice movie Nagraj Anna is best director. Must watch everybody. Jhund cross all Restriction lines. All time my favorite Ajay- Atul Music feel very beautiful. Film character such fantastic all good. Congratulations to all Jhund Team. | 10 |
I gave it a 6 because it is not the worst movie I have seen. But it is mind numbingly boring. I think even reading my reviews is a better use of your time. It lacks any surprise at all and some of the worst sex scenes I have ever seen in any movie ever. This movie made 142.8 million to much. I wish there was a way to pull money back from the actress if thats what i can call katniss. | 6 |
The book is great. The movie does a decent job keeping the important parts (always tough) and I enjoyed the twist at the end. I sort of like it better than the book ending. | 7 |
Don't pass on this because it's a cartoon show. If you enjoy the Marvel universe this is a must watch, really brings up a lot of interesting scenarios and minus 1 or 2 weaker episodes , the rest is great! Also the image quality is amazing on a 4K display.
Definitely recommended! | 8 |
"Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I" took up many difficult challenges such as tying up elements from the previous chapters together while not relying on expectations from fans with encyclopedic knowledge. Speaking for myself, as a "newbie", I enjoyed that penultimate film for what it was: an entertaining action-packed opus full of quiet and engaging moments.
The film also prepares us to a spectacular finale people have been waiting for during half a decade (half a month for me) without exhibiting any hurry to get into it, as if it took the proper time to tell its own story and as if the last book was too important to condense it into a three-hour format.
Now, there are additional objects of praises: the film allows us to get us a full view on every character who took part in Harry Potter's journey: Hagrid, the two good Defense Against the Dark Arts Teachers Rupin and Moody, the Weasley family (including Harry's sweetheart Ginny). And yet the film essentially focuses on the Power Trio: Harry, Ron and Hermione, taking them to locations they've never been in, as if the priority was to evacuate a few demons and seal their friendship first before they would find the definite strength in unity, to combine with the skills cumulated over their adventures at Hogwarts. I liked that aspect of the film.
And by the time it ended after two and half hours, I totally forgot there were still four or three Horcruxes to find and many obstacles paving the path to Voldemort. I don't know how this is going to be handled in Part II, especially in two hours and ten minutes (a rather short time by the series' standards), but I can't wait for the final round of the 'Harry Potter' series, a saga that defined a decade and where we literally saw three kids growing up before our eyes, while their world of wonder faded out, making way to the Dark Side.
Yes, long gone is the whimsical wizardry and its streams of spells and curses. The crucial moment occurs in the first act when Harry leaves everyone after the death of a few regulars (no need to spoil their name but surely you didn't expect a clean death toll?). He's intercepted by Ron who tells him to get off his high horse and stop thinking as the chosen one; this is no melancholy time when the Evil force commits mass killings and kidnappings, it's time to fight and everyone is on the same boat. Ron developed some maturity like Harry facial hair and he found the properly humbling words.
Which takes me back to the first film, I remember my first question was "what is a Muggle?". I initially thought the series was set in parallel universes (sort of) and there had to be zero interference between. "Deathly Hallows" opens with a nightmarish apocalyptic vision à la 'Dark Knight' proving that not only the Muggles aren't immune to the wrath of Voldemort and his minions but that they're targets as well. And speaking of Voldemort, from the table scene reuniting all the main villains, with him as the master of ceremony, we also understand that the line between good and evil is now clearly drawn.
There are degrees of vileness though, some are more reluctant than others, but when you look at the top "management", you know no quarter won't be asked. "Deathly Hallows" is different in tone but made me retrospectively understand the tragic climaxes of the previous chapters, it was all leading to it. Whether J.K. Rowling had that scenario in mind when writing the first book, one can be dubious, but there was no way that such a set-up couldn't lead to a larger-than-life exploration of the dark side of wizardry.
And not only the film inspires such expansion but it also allows us to have a subplot revealing the deepest motives of Voldemort: his quest for the Deathly Hallows, three old relics that might allow him to become the Master of Death and whose symbol echoes some conspiracy imagery. Rowling had a wide enough universe and such a rich gallery of characters she had quite a toolbox to build an inventive adventure, but she still had room for new stuff, including the infiltration of Voldemort in the Ministry of Magic through a corrupt member named Plus Thicknesses (Guy Henry).
But the heart of the story is the adventure in the wilderness lived by Ron, Harry and Hermione sealing their friendship and testing their mutual trust. There are moments of tension (sometimes sexual), moments of fun and relief and there's also a part where they simply walking down the street in London (and I expected a Rowling cameo). I appreciated that for all its richness, the film didn't get too thick and took the time for some long panoramic shots and extended scenes with the trio, as a last brief halt into our most beloved characters before the final action.
There was action all right in the first and ending sections but this is a film quietly introspective and often captivating. I concede sometimes, many devices seemed too far fetched but the pace is so fast that you don't have time to step back and think of the flaws, our minds are set in the quest for the Horcruxes and the defeating of Voldemort. And the series has turned into such a dark tone that for all I know, Harry might lose the fight or have a Pyrrhic victory.
I personally believe the film owes us a happy ending by now so I'm looking forward to have my expectations fulfilled in "Part II". | 8 |
While flipping through the satellite stations I seen Kung Fu Hustle and was totally amazed by the whole production! This is by far the most enjoyable Kung Fu movie I seen with over the edge Action Comedy! Everything from the action (w/excellent surround sound) to the surprised but intensely funny comedy has me still smiling way after the credits. I really do not like comedy because to me there is more stupidity than humor for my taste. This action comedy really got me going and want to see more movies in this style. This movie also brings into play the "Matrix" style of entertainment that fits nicely from start to finish. If you love Kung Fu and like to laugh than do your self a favor and see this movie. I signed up with "IMBD" because of this movie and to let others benefit in a superb production! | 10 |
"Mind Your Language" is a classic British comedy series that originally aired in the late 1970s. The show follows the misadventures of a group of adult students from various countries who are learning English as a second language in a night school class. With its clever writing, hilarious characters, and sharp wit, "Mind Your Language" is a timeless comedy that will have you laughing out loud.
One of the most impressive aspects of the show is the way it tackles issues of race, culture, and language with humor and sensitivity. The characters, while often stereotypical, are also imbued with depth and humanity, making them relatable and endearing to audiences.
The cast is outstanding, with the late great actor and comedian Barry Evans leading the ensemble as the hapless English teacher, Mr. Brown. The international cast of students also delivers standout performances, with memorable characters like the fiery Italian Anna, the lovable Pakistani Ali, and the reserved Japanese Taro.
Despite its age, "Mind Your Language" remains a relevant and entertaining series, with its themes of multiculturalism and language learning still resonating with audiences today. Its clever writing, iconic characters, and hilarious situations make it a must-watch for fans of classic British comedy and anyone who loves a good laugh. | 8 |
Continuing the murder mystery crazy is the sequel to the 2019 hit Knives Out from writer/director Rian Johnson, Glass Onion!
Good news: Glass Onion is a pretty crafty mystery. Much like Knives Out, there are multiple twists and turns that will keep you on your toes until the end.
Bad news: I'm keeping a lot of my thoughts to myself here, don't want to spoil anything! But what I will say is that I found Glass Onion not quite as thrilling and suspenseful as Knives Out. The movie is 2 hours and 20 minutes, and it does take a bit of time to lay down the groundwork for the rest of the film. Be weary if watching this late at night after having consumed a large meal!
You can stream Glass Onion on Netflix. I would definitely say worth the watch! | 7 |
Can't wait for the next episode. It's getting interesting day by day! | 10 |
Very overtly dramatized TV show with little or connection with a real world scenario. | 6 |
This movie is a frustrating mix of over-stylized clichés. The characters are two-dimensional. The writing is after school special level. | 4 |
I saw the high rating on here and figured it would be great. I found it was too ridiculous to enjoy. I kept wondering if I was just tired or dumb, while I kept telling myself how ridiculous this movie is. I took a nap and tried watching again and it didn't help. It did help me fall asleep though! | 3 |
The film presumes to demand respect as a warning about threats to democracy. At the same time, the pratfalls, cartoonish bad guys and goofy situations tell the viewer not to take it seriously. Amsterdam does not succeed as parody, allegory or metaphor. It mainly succeeds in taking excellent actors and using them to confuse and bore the audience. With an hour left, I took a break to assess whether my life would be less full if I walked away. I walked away. I don't know where this production went off the rails but it's a shame that this important story was wasted on celebrity and cheap stunts. Too bad. | 2 |
Well, that was... Strange...
Guess I should have seen that coming from the title, huh?
First off just let me say that I do understand that I am not the in the shows target demographic. I am not currently a child, nor did I grow up in the eighties, and I did not have a porridge-bowl haircut no matter how many times my mother threatened me with one.
However, if a show is to be rated so highly I would expect it to at least cater to some other viewers tastes and interests - or, say, maintain a consistent level of writing and acting - perhaps? Is that really too much to ask?
While the first season was amazing, suspenseful, and consistently written and acted (if maybe slightly predictable) - the show since then has been anything but that. I do not understand how a show can manage to mess up in so many ways and still be lauded as a modern masterpiece, I'm sorry. Storylines left half explored if ratings went down during that viewing period, actors appearing to fall in and out of love with the roles mid-episode, childish premises and often borderline subversive messaging is rampant throughout Stranger Things - yet its rating is seemly left unblemished?
It's sad to think that reviews and public opinion now seem to be influenced more by a projects financial success and marketing ability, rather than its consistency, quality and messaging. While this may be advantageous for the studios that make such rubbish, I think even they are doing themselves a disservice - let alone the viewers. There was an era in the late-90's early-2000's when studios put their money behind projects that dared their audience to think, and treated them with intellectual respect. Sadly, it would seem that era has passed - and we are doomed to the mediocrity that we have partially foistered upon ourselves... Will this ever change?
Stranger things have happened... | 5 |
8 years ago, some of the greatest characters in comic history had a whole new world opened up to them thanks to 2008's Iron Man. Nobody thought the film would have the impact it did, including me. Now we are in 2016 and we have reached Captain America: Civil War. It boasts the most characters in a Marvel film, the best film in the entire Marvel franchise and also the greatest action scene in any superhero movie ever, but we will get onto that later.
So the film serves as not only a new Avengers story but also a solid sequel to Captain America: The Winter Soldier. It would be easy to make a film with so many characters sideline the Captain America story, but this film really is at it's core a Captain America film. Sure there is a lot to cram in but it is done so well and fits in so well as part of a trilogy. I saw this film as a midnight screening and saw it along with the other two films beforehand. It really is a good idea to watch both Captain America films before and notice the detail put in to incorporate these stories. Cap is my all time favourite Avenger and seeing the development all three of these films has give him really is amazing.
The basic plot without spoilers involves the Avengers causing a huge disaster on a mission in Lagos which results in the government devising the Sokovia accords which they must sign in order to operate under them. Tony Stark feels guilty about the casualties and destruction but Steve Rogers wants to keep operating freely and saving the world. This results in a divide between them and the other Avengers are forced to decide who's side they are on. Whilst this is happening Cap and Falcon are still on the hunt for Bucky Barnes which does play in to the start of the Civil War but i will leave it at that. So already there is a lot going on and we also get the introduction of Spider-Man and Black Panther as well as Daniel Brul as villain Baron Zemo. It would be easy to make this film a complete mess like Batman v Superman but it was not. It is hard not to compare the films because they are quite similar, involving destruction etc. But this film does it so much better.
The airport scene in this film where the two teams fight for the first time is perfect. Tom Holland's introduction as Spider-Man happens just before this and his personality even when fighting is perfectly nailed. Black Panther also feels the same way, just the way these characters are on the big screen is a dream come true. Seeing Ant Man (who is awesome by the way) interact with Vision and Spiderman interact with Ant Man and Black Panther interact with Captain America etc. It is perfect. I also have seen the film and still don't know which side i am on. You want to be with both Steve and Tony on this because they are both right and have valid points. But seeing the personalities of every character clash and play in to every scene they are in is just brilliant. The villain of the film, Zemo, is average at best though which is the only small gripe. Crossbones as well barely has any screen time, but Zemo's plan almost seems like something that the teams could have fought over themselves.
At 2 hours 20 mins there is a lot to cram in but in the end as a Marvel film this one is the best by far. It is emotional, hilarious and most importantly awesome. I cannot recommend the film enough. I have seen it twice already and that won't be the last time. Films don't get much better than this. | 10 |
Season 1 the kids did fantastic. Season2 their acting went downhill. I don't know what changed but it was unwatchable, the kids were so fake, so very disappointing . season 1 gets a 10 and season 2 gets a 2. How does Hollywood keep screwing things up! It's strange how Hollywood can screw up success . | 2 |
It's like most Netflix production, they take a good idea from another movie, and they make a bad movie with it. Here they tried a cross-over between A Quiet Place and The Happening, and of course it's bad. | 2 |
The story of Black Panther is an ueber-generic-bubble, zillion times already told (wow, a villain wants to conquer a kingdom!), boosted with some CGI, some good, some mediocre, but like e.g. the new Star Trek s*ht called Discovery the magic is gone, and my brain melts almost into nothingness watching that kind of stuff called blockbuster today.
Btw: a panther is always black. So a black panther is a tautology if I remember my terminology right. There are no white, green or red panthers in the to mankind known universe, there is only one exception I know about, and that's the famous Pink Panther! And he beats the Black Panther easy in humor, in storytelling, even the grade of violence is superior ;)
I suspect there is a global conspiracy to kill all of mankind by boredom or mutate us into brain-dead zombies. But for my redamption and safety of my sanity I got some copies of Pink Panthers great adventures.
Final words: Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam (Cato, the Elder). | 4 |
10% action, 90% talks, and the actions are not even top notch, just a generic shootings. | 2 |
First of all, such shows coming out of India, the detailing and freshness in writing is inspiring. Secondly, though Silicon Valley rocks but I'm rating Pitchers more than what I rated Silicon Valley because of the following reasons:
1. The life of entrepreneurs before getting into Startups is very important as compared to after they're into it full time. More focus on the challenges in starting up and the indianization of course, scores more points.
2. Not revealing the IDEA is actually ingenious.
The problem within Indian Startup scene is people focussing too much on Funding and giving out equities without thinking about building real businesses. We'd want to see more kick-ass attitude from Naveen and especially YOGI about not giving a damm about investors rather than begging for money. Its the first time they're starting up. They've got the money, now time to see some attitude :) | 8 |
La-La Land is a very important film. It received so many Oscars, but we have seen weak films awarded before that. It is important as a proclamation of incompetence. This film invaded the musical genre which traditionally belonged to artists who can sing and dance.
The film is about a young woman who wants to become an actor and a young musician. Ryan Gosling who plays main protagonist is a good actor but this role is not for him; he is extremely clumsy and when he dances around a streetlight it resembles a parody on Gene Kelly in Singing in the Rain. His voice reminds one of a whining mosquito. Concerning Emma Stone, she also cannot sing or dance. At least she is not as clumsy as Ryan.
The film's choreography was made with the imagination of a kindergarten teacher. The plot is a collection of trivialities and the camera work is made by a person who does not known anything about composition except for the central position in the frame, which makes this banal film even more boring and trivial than it could be. Only positive aspect is the light feeling of nostalgia is left by the film.
Read more at: http://indie-cinema.com/2017/02/la-la-land-review/ | 1 |
Reviewed after all 3 seasons. The series had its good and bad moments
Pros: I liked Don and Penny the best, unfortunately they received the least screen time. Good FX.
Cons: The over powering capabilities of Maureen and Judy. Wokeness at it's best from Hollywood writers. It's building strong women at the expense of belittling men. Many reviews note Molly Parker always look tired or worried all the time, not the best lead for the series. Many times the dialog seemed forced.
In S3, Dad confirms, "they'll be OK, Judy is with them". Supergirl #1, Maureen, with 1 second of analysis, is able to determine there's too much power being generated and therefore there must be a defensive system, that no one else knows about. Might as well have kicked Sebastain in his know nothing head. Later, Supergirl #2, Judy, stating "I'm the only one here qualified to do it"....kicking Don in the balls.
You might ask why didn't they have any guns or weapons on the Jupiter?
You will also ask how did the others even survive on the planet without the Robinsons? | 4 |
I hated the movie. I thought it was overly long. I thought the plot was stupid. I honestly didn't like a single thing about it except for Brad Pitt. He is always great to look at. I was there with 3 other people and all four of us hated it. | 2 |
I finally watched this movie and the secret is out ... Nolan has created a dud. I have realized that the combined IQ of all Nolanites is sub-zero. Add to that the fact that this movie is receiving 9.1 rating. 9.1 realllly ? What is there in this f**king movie ? I think Nolan has duped us all with this colossal mess. He must have run out of ideas or something ....
The other reviews suggest that the imagery in this movie is top notch. Well, it ain't that good. trust me . I have seen it all before in sci-fi movies. The 3 hrs of this piece of sh*t is something I am never going to get back.
Stay away from this one folks ... nolan must have slept through while directing this crap. | 5 |
I was very excited seeing 1st two episodes but very disappointed today after watching episode 3..rubbish. Disney what r u doing. | 1 |
As far as sports movies go, Southpaw is not really up there with the first Rocky or Raging Bull, but it's not a total loss either. Some of the better elements of this movie are the performances, especially Jake Gyllenhaal's, who's on a winning streak in the most recent years (see Prisoners, Enemy or Nightcrawler).The side characters include Rachel McAdams as his wife, Forest Whitaker as the trainer, Oona Laurence as the daughter and 50 Cent as a fight manager. They all do a decent job, but the one who really shines out is Oona Laurence.
The directing style of Antoine Fuqua is beautiful, the fight scenes look amazing, some of the best boxing fights we had on the big screen. The way the camera is positioned, you really feel you're in the ring with the fighters and that adds an intensity to the scene.
That being said, the movie really falls short in the story section. The screenplay is filled with clichés and predictable elements that you meet in every boxing movie ever made. Also the at some points, the plot becomes overly dramatic, there isn't a single touch of humor to lighten some of the movie's scenes.
If you're a fan of Jake Gyllenhaal then this movie is a decent watch, if not, go and re-watch the original Rocky. All in all, this movie gets a 6 out of 10. | 6 |
A long has come to a sweet end. Emotionally it was equally good as the first season. Those who dream of starting startups must like it. The story was very realistic. Behind this viewers will ejoy the chemistry of friendship. But Jitu was being missed. But Jitu's absence also gave a taste of reality. Everyone was perfect. Watching Naveen, Mandal or Yogi, you'll not feel that it's been 7 years that we watched the first season. If Jitendra Kumar is TVF's SRK then Naveen Kasturiya is TVF's Salman bhai. This guy is doing better day by day. Every character he portrays, he just dives into it. He is a Gem. Arunabh Kumar is amazing. Why don't he act much!! He is so natural. Mandal was great also. Its a must watch. Its fun, entertaining and motivating. | 9 |
Some movies I can watch without tiring of them. There are few, I can only think of three, and Fargo is definitely one of them. The Coen Brothers have produced an amazing film. The dark humor, chilling music, and excellent dialogue make this an incredibly enjoyable film unless, of course, you are the type that tires easily. It might be too slow for you.
I am a die-hard action fan (pun intended). But somehow, Fargo reached and excellence that made it one of my top movies. With this film, it has been said to be a hate-it-or-love-it. I loved it, and I can't see how one could hate it. | 10 |
What If...? May not offer much to the bigger MCU narrative, but surprising takes on familiar characters and some of the franchise's best action sequences make for entertaining viewing. | 7 |
I had a hard time with this show, though ultimately I did enjoy it and am looking forward to season 2.
Wednesday Addams is great, and treated well as a character, but the rest of the family feels veeeery lacking, either in development in the script or in the actor's portrayal. Morticia is difficult to describe, it's like they wanted to combine the previous versions of the character even though they were so different. Gomez feels weak and kind of sad. Fester was totally miscast and has no bite to him whatsoever (which he should, despite actually being quite nice). They also added stitches to Thing...like a sentient dismembered hand isn't dark enough already, but whatever.
Obviously Wednesday is the focal point and I'm glad that they did so well with her, but my hopes are high that the rest of the family will get better in season 2.
As for the plot, it was a bit of a meal to get through. Not to mention that nobody in the writers room was ever told that "Goody" = "Mrs" and is not an actual name. | 6 |
There's a lot of things to talk about regarding Interstellar. The state of today's blockbusters, Christopher Nolan's position on the pedestal, the McConaissance, the audiovisual experience, or contemporary attitudes towards space travel. Unfortunately Interstellar offers me no spark to talk about them. While I liked the film, I regret to have such a mild reaction to a Nolan. There was a time when his films were the event of the year. Even his last film was an event for the year, but that quickly evaporated upon The Dark Knight Rises' bafflingly clumsy last hour. I still cherish The Dark Knight and Inception, but it looks like he's out of juice. Not that Interstellar is bad, it just never soars like those films do. Perhaps it's due to rampant expectations. To be fair - it works for a lot of people, and I see why, but I found the melodrama of Inception a far more captivatingly emotional experience than what has been claimed to be Nolan finally having a heart.
The problem with Interstellar is that it's too sparse. It has great moments, but they're few and far between. Not that the film doesn't initially barrage you with passable exposition, mysteries and introductions, but there isn't a sense of edge of seat jeopardy until the first expedition on a planet. This must be 45 minutes in. Ostensibly, Nolan is concerned with the emotion, that pain of a father torn from his child, but they're not immersive. Powerful in theory, numbed in execution. Again - not bad - just not as good as they could be. I just couldn't invest in this enough to really get under the character's skin. It's got a logic holes that work superficially but not under scrutiny, many of which have already been dissected by the film's most scathing critics. It is a step up from Rises, though I do feel the cinematography isn't as good as it's been claimed to be with it feeling far too blown out and old school. Interstellar suffers under the circumstances, but is at least a decent effort at world building and concept exploration.
7/10 | 7 |
First, the fun stuff. Its too long. By a good 30-40 minutes. Second, the sound is god-awful. As in *intentionally* god-awful according to Chris Nolan. Third, its just sort of an iffy story with an iffy ending.
Now, the drudge work. MM does a good job as the lead and the supporting cast is also good. Not great, not award winning but competent and professional. The home world part of the story is not given enough of a boost and the interstellar part is given too much -- but then, Interstellar is the title and not Home World so they had to fluff up the title stuff. I kind of preferred the Home World storyline over the Interstellar as I thought it had more dramatic potential while avoiding the whole how-are-we-gonna-end-this-thing problem.
No spoilers here and no long-winded stuff either. Its OK, go see it if you want to risk blood clots in your legs from sitting too long. | 5 |
"The Dark Knight Rises" by Ivette Fred-Rivera The film industry, like the city museums, have taken the task of making art in NY to revitalize the city after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They have succeeded, the city is as vibrant as ever, and this film shows paradoxically its endurance with other attacks that do not destroy Gotham, thanks to Batman, of course! The aerial vehicle of Batman seems an ufo over the city. The camera movements makes it to simulate a bat. Excellent. The sound track too. Although Bane (Tom Hardy) announced at the beginning that what matters is his plan, it is unclear what the 'revolutionary' plan is. Much less is understood that he is a necessary evil. How would a revolution take place when no one knows where is heading? A revolution requires strategist planning, clear strategies, defined purposes. Similarly, many protests end up as parades because at the end of the day nobody knows what the next step is. Meanwhile people get tired in the process. A pleasure to enjoy such strong chemistry between Bruce (Christian Bale) and Selina Kyle (Anne Hathaway). They have to really attract each other! Selina's naked neck is spectacular as shown by Bruce's mother stolen pearls on her neck. Also, in one scene, Bruce turns his back to Selina, showing his trust, which she honors by not attacking him from behind but disappearing instead. The film works with the fragility of good over evil in both Bruce Wayne's as well as police commissioner Gordon's physical fragilities. The street battles are improbable for our Batman. This theme is dealt brilliantly by Hitchcock's villains. Seeing the movie gave me the impression that the author of the massacre in Colorado had seen it earlier because of the strong similitude with the scenes of violence Bane performed on Wall Street and in the crowded stadium. It is noticed that Bane is not at the level of evil, misuse of intelligence, that the Joker reached in the second part of the trilogy. I think because evil is divided into two characters, Bane and Miranda, for the alleged advantage of adding the element of surprise when we learned at the end that she – a woman - was the real villain. The effect is not good because her acting is loose. She had the challenge of playing the role of an ordinary looking woman, hiding her extraordinariness. But she played the role, ordinarily. Another issue: the importance of a good teacher, and her noble teachings, the movie reminds me of the acclaimed film "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon". It is not knowledge, the technology alone but the use we make of them, what puts ethics over science and tech. Some critics complain of the film lack of coherence, its confusing narrative. Even if this were true, I do not consider it a problem (apart from the prejudice of considering coherence as always a benefit). Usually artists and thinkers wait some time for a critical appraisal of the past. The movie talks about the present and shares the same confusion of the moment. It has the freshness and vitality of being current. I'll paraphrase lines of the libretto - by Christopher and Jonathan Nolan - that I find memorable: Bain: 'No one was interested in who I was until I got the mask.'
'No true despair without hope.' 'I am not afraid, I am angry.' Bain to Batman: 'You think the darkness is your ally? I was born in the shadows, you adopted it. ' 'No need for heroes in peace time.' Selina: 'When you do what you gotta do, then nobody let's you do what you want to do.' Precisely the problem of Carlito (Al Pacino) in Carlito's Way. The older man to Bruce, 'Your problem is that you lost your fear of death believing it is better. Come up without the rope, as did the child, so will return the fear of death that will make you brave.' (Note the importance of the collective and individual mantra while trying to escape from the cave.) Robin: "Sometimes structures become barriers.' (So you have to leave them!) Bruce: 'There is nothing out there for me.' Batman to Robin: "If you work alone, use a mask. ' Bruce to Selina: 'There is more in you than that.' In the end, going out to sea, we recognize the infamous image of a mushroom as a direct quote of the atomic bomb explosion on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Can one man really save Gotham city? Bruce insists that he is an ordinary man and that anyone with good deeds can be a hero. Underneath his mask, Batman's green eyes symbolize hope. Do you believe him? The movie is worth seeing. | 6 |
Apart from the great production design and Christopher Plummer the only other reason to watch this movie is to listen to Daniel Craig's accent. The cinematographer clearly is not a fan of making his cast look like film stars. I've never seen so many crows feet, wrinkles and dark sunken eyes. | 1 |
I just don't get it, it's a nice twist on the super hero genre surely, but a 9 out of 10 stars?!! No. Something isn't right here.
I'm sorry, but the story is just very average and a bit cheap if you ask me... It's not moving or special, it's just so predictable! The main character is just plain out boring, although the super girl is interesting. But thats it... It's violent and it's weird... Please stop glorifying this cheap series and stop comparing it with big titles like Deadpool and Wolverine. Please just stop. It just ain't the quality. My highest rate is a 6, but even that is too high. | 5 |
Review from Holland. Nowhere near the big movies like heat, casino, godfather. What was the purpose of making this movie? I didn't see the whole movie because it wasn't going anywhere. | 2 |
This movie is better than the first. Better cgi, better villain and better storyline. Seen the first one 8 times, so far seen this one 5 times, planning on more. Doc Ock is the best Spiderman villain ever. Glad they made this one. Doc Ock was evil from the start in the comics but I am glad they make him more human gone mad in the movie. It made for a more interesting story. The ending left loose ends enough to keep you guessing on the next movie. I hope they go with Harry's storyline. This is clearly the movie of the year. I hope the Academy does not ignore it come March 2005. It would be a travesty. Alfred Molina should easily get a supporting actor nod. So should Rosemary Harris. The screenplay is clearly the best one this year and the effects are impeccable! This should be a no-brainer for the Hollywood set! | 10 |
I watched it with my parents, this show is so simple, pure and sweet. Writter and director did their homework very well to show the life and people of our rural india. | 8 |
13 reason why as the title suggest can be best connected in season 1 and 2. When Hanna had her 13 reasons that motivated or rather forced take a drastic step. After this Season 3 is just about missing persons story and season 4 is amazingly boring.
If you really want to enjoy this series then stop after season 2 and you will have some points to ponder. Otherwise season3 and 4 bores so much that you may want to skip a lot of episodes. | 7 |
3 out of 5 stars (average)
Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood is the newest film from Quentin Tarantino, and it's unlike any of his others. He isn't exploring any deep themes, giving us nuanced characters, or making a statement about old Hollywood. With this film Tarantino has gotten many of his previous collaborators together for a fun, episodic romp about the day-to-day lives of Hollywood hopefuls, with mostly enjoyable results. Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood is no classic, but fun performances, good writing, and a wild ending make it worth seeing at least once for Tarantino fans.
We follow washed-up TV actor Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio), his pervy stuntman Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt having the time of his life), and Rick's next-door neighbor and actress Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie). Rick and Cliff are both seeking further status in 1969 Hollywood, and Sharon is a rising star living life to the fullest. All 3 will experience the highs and lows of the Hollywood life while trying to advance their careers.
Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood is less a movie than a series of connected episodes featuring its characters. While I typically dislike these kinds of films, enough of the scenes hit their mark thanks to Tarantino's writing and direction of his actors that I enjoyed myself. DiCaprio, Robbie, and especially Pitt are all having a blast here, with the latter giving one of his most entertaining performances in years. The film also subverts expectations effortlessly and gives one of 2019's nuttiest (and bloodiest) climaxes. Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood won't rank among Tarantino's greats, but it's still fun viewing. See it if you like his stuff. | 6 |
Subsets and Splits