Review
stringlengths 6
10.3k
| Rating
int64 1
10
|
|---|---|
After watching the first few episodes I was not impressed and really was about to give up on it. But after watching another episode and then another and by the time I got to the 7th one, I was starting to get into the show. Now that I watched all 10 shows I really am looking forward to seeing a season two.
| 7 |
The Falcon and the Winter Soldier is basically a watered-down John Wick meets The Boys versus Orphan Annie with a touch of BLM. It's not bad but it's not great.
| 6 |
If you really enjoyed the game and the books you'll definitely love this series, trust me you won't regret it
| 1 |
Shameless cash grab...Loved the original Knives Out and was excited to see the next step. This sequel failed to show anything interesting. No major twists, nothing to make you think. They just cut the movie in the middle to spoil everything they had just set up. Big name actors aren't enough to save terrible writing and lazy resolution. This story had less layers than single ply toilet paper. *SPOILER ALERT* I mean come on, a southern accent twin who sets the Mona Lisa on fire??? Did a second grader who just watched Clue for the first time write this? Ruined a franchise by abandoning everything that made Knives Out great.
| 4 |
5 September 2019 - I really try to give a series a chance to prove itself, but I'm abandoning 13 REASONS WHY after S3 E4. It is scrapping the barrel of all things potentially hurtful, damaging and downright dangerous in teen living. The prescriptive warnings by the cast to seek help if you are in the situations depicted in their drama do not excuse the series reinjuring those in peril for the sake of further episodes/seasons. This series no longer has a cathartic benefit. I will no longer be watching it (despite a new bright light in the cast). As I prophetically wrote in 2017 - This series has sucked the life out of its premise. I leave the series with a rating of 5 (meh) out of 10. {Teenage Drama}
I've left the previous reviews here so you can see how it fell out of my favour.
3 April 2017 - I'm just three episodes deep into this Netfilx series and I'm enjoying the characters and the suspense. This is a good premise, the acting is strong, and I can't wait to find out what happened, as we see the story from the varying points of view. Looking good - so I'm giving it a preliminary 8 (great) out of 10.
8 April 2017 - I'm sorry to say that the series didn't live up to the premise. I think it was meant to be a cautionary tale, but the writing was uneven, the characters' emotional arches poorly drawn, and some episodes were just a downright mess. The acting was good because the casting was strong. Even though the scripts were disappointing the series will resonate with those who have been shamed, bullied, emotionally or physically abused. Unfortunately, these are now adolescent realities, so people will see their experiences reflected here. But the writers sewed these components together poorly, interrupting the build of suspense, artificially inflating the emotional environment which in turn compromised the trueness of the characters and leaving the audience disappointed, or in some cases, lost (I almost quit after the very poor episode - S1 E7) and a general degradation of the quality of the series). Although there were some 7 (good) episodes, there were also 6s (fair) and even 4 (poor), so I'm giving the whole series a 5.5 (failed potential) out of 10. I'd love to see these performers again, but the series has sucked the life out of it's premise.
| 5 |
What a horrible mess of a movie this is. Is Hollywood really in this much trouble. Sorry to be so harsh but this is a disaster. The comedic elements fall flat, the street was written by a 3rd grade fan boy. It's all just cliche and trying so hard. I use to think Tom Hardy was a good actor. He's showing me how horrible he really is. And I love Woody to death and love good bad movies but this just fails miserably.
| 2 |
When you watched that movie called Shawshank redemption it shocked your very foundations on all levels, and may even have changed the course of your life if even for a few moments. Batman is an amazing movie.
Yes it is fun and exciting,,,,,But is the rating that is higher than Shawshank or The Godfather a reality in any mine except for the Warner Brothers executives who keep pressing 10 as a rating for Batman or the 14 year old faggy boys who still can't wack off without waking up the dead normal..? Please you wanks,,,,Show some Balls even if they are not hairy and take back those 10's and make them 8's and Kharma will go back to ya brothers... Peace out.
| 5 |
Again a nice movie from Aushutosh. Excellent cinematography by Mahesh. He captured Indian light very well. Leaves a impression on mind after you have seen the movie.
Though there are technical faults in the storyline yet those can be left aside on the backdrop of a heart-touching theme. A theme for the people who are leaving their countries / states in search of a better life without realizing the fact that they can create a better living environment at home itself.
An insight on the problems of India whose underdeveloped part is somehow or other responsible for itself for the underdevelopment. The social jinx in the rural India which should have been broken long before are now hampering the progress of the villages.
The movie is another Gem after Lagaan in the collection of Ashutosh and Indian Cinema as a whole.
| 8 |
I endured this film just to satisfy my curiosity. It has to be one of the worst films I have ever sat through. I am amazed that this film currently has a 7.5 star rating. The acting is awful, script is non existent and the characters are so predictable and hollow. For a funny film I cannot remember even snickering once and fail to see how it could be defined as a comedy. Do yourself a favour and stay well away from this dross and check out some more worthy alternatives that would give you far greater pleasure. Check out films like the holiday or 27 dresses, these movies would offer a far more satisfying cinema experience. I sincerely hope more educated film goers vote negatively for this film, in the manner it genuinely deserves there bye giving it a more realistic rating that other film buffs could base their judgement upon. Come on folks let's be fair to everyone concerned and give those involved with this film a true reflection on what it is they have produced - an extremely mediocre picture that deserves to be forgotten very quickly.
| 1 |
1917 was a movie made for a specific audience of people and though I may not be a part of that audience, I found it tolerable. The movie had one storyline, for Lance Corporal to give a letter to The Devon's, and stuck with it the whole time. It wasn't complicated or hard to comprehend, which is how most war movies normally are, but instead held my attention. I love how accurately the creators made the movie, For example, when Lance Corporal and Blake are running through the war trenches in the beginning, it shows a great representation of how crowded and packed it was for the soldiers. Other than this one specific example, the movie shows many amazing visuals of how this war was, especially for people who didn't live it or really see it. Despite me having mixed feelings about this movie, I could definitely see people loving this movie.
| 5 |
This movie is for dumb people. Way over rated and just silly.
| 5 |
That was so simple story. Not recommended. They could make it more believable.
| 6 |
I love this story and couldn't wait to see the latest rendition of it. I read that Bradley Cooper had to lower his voice; why? Was it to sound like Kris Kristofferson? I could barely understand a word he said! The romance seemed secondary to the fame game, without the romance there is no story. I love the other three Star is born movies but I'm sorry in my opinion this was a huge flop.
| 4 |
What a series. Like many others here I was wary about being able to do justice to the characters of these stories but I was so wrong. Suitabley twisty with a dark sophistication. The reason I gave it a nine instead of a ten was the atrocious and at times blast me through the back of my arm chair soundtrack. I was fed up of having to reach for the volume control and then miss the start of the next line and have to crank it back up again. It would have been just as effective with out it.
| 9 |
What a MASTERPIECE this is. The best movie! This movie is the epic of the Industry. This is even better than the historical movies which are made in these time, I mean just look out at the ratings . Jodhaa Akbar has the better ratings from other Historical movies as it deserves it. Guyys if you also liked the movie than kindly shower your love by giving Great reviews as they deserves all the love and success ( I know if you have ever watched this movie then you also liked this). Love you all the cast and crew . The makers and lovers of Jodhaa Akbar made this movie the best, precious, masterpiece and epic. Thank you all!!! Love you THE REAL JODHAA AKBAR .....
| 10 |
Just finished watching season 2. And I must say the show had roller coaster of emotions which a founder go through during his struggle days. The chemistry between all the characters is still intact like seasons 1. Missed seeing jeetu in season 2. Great work from the creators. Thanks for making season 2. Naveen, mandal and Yogi rocked life before in the show. Lot of entrepreneurial lessons in same show. How much sacrifices and cost it needs to build owns dream. Everyone in the show deserves a great thanks who acted, supported and directed. Hope to see more seasons coming in future. It would recommend this show to everyone.
| 10 |
Nobody can give me these 3,5 hours of lifetime back I wasted watching this movie. You could easily reduce it to one hour without missing anything. No arc of suspense. Nothing. No idea what all the commenters here are so excited about.
| 2 |
Watched two episodes, assuming it was a biography, and loved them. I come from a family of chess players and my younger brother has had a ranking over 2000 and won a number of various championships. As with the main character, he is able to play chess games in his mind but without the aid of drugs. After the second episode, I searched and discovered that this is not a true story. In fact, I learned much to my dismay that no female has ever been world champion. My reaction is that this might support the position of those who believe men are intellectually superior to women. Very disturbing.
| 6 |
It was over too soon.
The robot was and is SO excellent.
Toby Stephens and Ignacio Serricchio very hot. Plus Ignacio Serricchio's character, Don, is endearingly funny. DO NOT DITCH either one in Season 3. Toby is hot. Do not ditch. You put him in a different ship . . . You'd better not be going to ditch him . . . And give Don even more material. KEEP the chicken. Keep the horses. Or find better ones on another planet.
Save Vijay's dad.
Season 3 ditch list:
Ditch mom (so boring . . . It's the math), Judy (ZERO cred as sixteen-year-old doctor), THE MUSIC (SO annoying, in your face, old sounding, IN THE WAY ALL THE TIME, TOO BIG and blappy). Get new better music. More variety. More adapted to the story line as it progresses.
Dr. Smith was evolving. She's a good story.
| 6 |
I am not a lover of the original books series, therefore all the words following are only applicable to this TV series.
As said, the show is an epic soap opera, it depicts the rise and down of the house of dragons. However, as a extension series of the GoT, we do hope more. Overall, despite the show depicts its characters much more complex, and sometimes overly complex, the 1st season tells only a simply story: the king made some terrible and rushed choices and then troubles followed.
If you judge it as a soap opera, I would give it 9, as it is basically what GRR Martin has been writing about through all these years: family affairs decorated with some epic plots.
I gave it 7/10 however, because it hardly steps even one step out of those boring and daunting family affairs. Through out the season, what we see is basically marriage after marriage and then betrayal after betrayal. It would be freshing when you first saw it, but then, you found those storys hardly different. It is always about finding a heir and no more. And, come on, it is 2022, if it is not extended from GoT, people would hardly appreciate another costume drama...
More, although the eps jumps abruptly in years, and sometimes the audiences may feel divided, the pacing is actually slow and boring. The characters acts with each other for no obvious purpose and make a mess that doesn't seems to be meaningful in the end. For example, they make Daemon a good competitor for the throne in the first few eps. Then, for some reasons, he seems to be obsessed with his sister and then become a cozy husband? Again, Alicent also has unfounded motivations and few abrupt turnings of her atitude towards Rhaenyra make this character shattered as well. She loved his childhood companion and then turned away from her. Then, suddenly, the old and hardly clear-minded king said something and she become mercyful?
Forgive me if I make mistakes understanding all those stories, but I all I wanted to say is that the grand plot is too simple yet the story itself is too complicated and narrowed. I hope this could be fixed in following seasons and the show could focus more on something that is beyond tiring family affairs.
| 7 |
Nagraj Manjule has once again created this masterpiece.... After 120 years, Bollywood has started doing what it used to do for a long time now ... and without hesitation, South Indian movies like Jay Bhim, Karnan, Sarpatta Parambarai, Asuran etc ..and Marathi movie Jayanti are showing a penetrating hit.
The audience is kindly requested to start liking such movies now and start supporting such movies.
| 10 |
Writing needed improvement Cox acting was very poor, however, Vincent acting was excellent Series lost the plot in second season but picked up nicely in 3rd season and seems to be finally on track.
| 5 |
When I heard this movie would be exploring the spirits that inhabit the Warren's Occult Museum, I was very excited. Sadly the movie doesn't do much with this concept. A majority of the film focuses on a young girl named Judy, her school problems and her babysitters.
The 4 or 5 spirits the movie shows off are very cool but they get practically 2 minutes of screen time each. You only see just their heads in a few cases which is really sad because the bts for this movie is actually really cool and you should watch it right now.
I'm not kidding though, all of them wear highly detailed, full body costumes that you just don't see! It's really frustrating.
There is a possibility you may like the film though so I wouldn't recommend skipping it when your binging The Conjuring Universe movies.
| 5 |
Great job. Cavill strikes again. He was born to play Geralt.
People need to stop comparing it to GOT. Both shows are on two different planes. Just watch it and enjoy it for what it is.
| 9 |
It's an old wine in new bottle or to be said a an old recipe presented in a delicious way. It starts of slowly and steadily making it's way to finally get you hooked on your seats till all the 8 episodes get over and makes you want for more.
The season 1 ending couldn't be better than what we see and witnessed for Russian doll.
A thumbs up from my end.
| 9 |
It's good to see that we're getting some effort from netflix here.
Don't go in expecting an excellent plot and extremely fleshed out characters. This movie is focused on tight, almost claustrophobic combat, long cuts and good to follow action. It feels cliche to say similar to John Wick but it is in some ways. The movie is not interested in massive explosions and set pieces like Mission Impossible or the Fast and Furious franchises. One action scene in particular was amazing. All action scenes were enjoyable.
The ending let it down for me a little, but it is still worth a watch if you're looking for a good fun action movie.
| 7 |
Review: I must admit, I wasn't that impressed with the first half of this film but when the action kicks in, it is truly superb. Watching, most of the Marvel heroes in one epic battle, was a spectacular moment in cinema but I'm sure that it would have been completely different if Thor and the Hulk was involved. I did find Bucky/Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan) a bit dull, mainly because he was the cause of all the trouble and he didn't seem to speak or interact with anyone but maybe that's because everyone wanted to kill him. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), also wasn't his usual, charismatic self, which was a shame because the movie could have done with a bit of humour. They finally put the Falcon (Anthony Mackie) to good use, and some of his gadgets were quite impressive, and it was good to see the Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) and Spiderman (Tom Holland), play a big part in the epic battle. I'm not quite sure what the Black Widow's hero abilities are but she always seems to be in the middle of everything, and I think she is the only superhero to make an appearance in all of the Marvel movies. Wanda (Elizabeth Olsen) seems to have the most unique super hero abilities out of all of the Avengers, to date but with a huge line-up in comic book hero movies planned in the future, I really can't imagine what direction these Marvel movies are going to go in but it's very exciting. This movie did seem more like an Avengers movie than a Captain America movie but as the focus was more on the Winter Soldier, I can understand why they put it under the Captain America umbrella. Anyway, I thoroughly enjoyed the action scenes and the director gave each individual superhero some depth and well earned screen time. I can't wait for the next Marvel movie! Great!
Round-Up: I was surprised to see Black Widow come out without a scratch on her body, and a hair out of place, after the big explosion, which killed Black Panthers father and with all that commotion happening with the Avengers, we're was Nick Fury? Anyway, this movie was directed by Anthony & Joe Russo, who brought you Welcome to Collinwood, with George Clooney, You, Me and Dupree and Captain America: The Winter Soldier. I find it weird that these unknown directors, who haven't made anything that impressive, are chosen to make these humongous comic book hero movies! With such a huge task at hand, and a massive budget to control, I would have thought that the studios would have picked directors who have a lot of experience in this field, especially with so many different characters to bring to the big screen. In terms of the Marvel movies, these new directors are obviously out to prove that they have the ability to do something amazing, which is why I have been impressed with the outcome of the franchise so far. The Russo brothers are rumoured to be directing the Avengers: Infinity War, which is due to be released in 2018, so they certainly have there hands full, especially with the introduction of new super heroes in this movie. I do think that they done a great job with this film, even though the first half was a bit glum but the epic battle scenes were worth waiting for.
Budget: $250million Worldwide Gross: $1.1billion (WOW!)
I recommend this movie to people who are into their action/adventure/sci-fi movies, starring Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, Don Cheadle, Jeremy Renner, Chadwick Boseman, Paul Bettany, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, William Hurt, Tom Holland and Daniel Bruhl. 8/10
| 8 |
This movie contains plenty of references for die-hard Harry Potter fans to eat up, but with a dull story and confusing plot, it leaves a lot to be desired...
The only scenes I really enjoyed were the Hogwarts scenes. Very nostalgic and I always love hearing the Harry Potter theme.
Special effects weren't amazing, but not terrible either. The action scenes were ok. I found it difficult to keep up with what was going on. There were plenty of the titular Fantastic Beasts, but they were rarely shown as being more important than the human characters, and were hardly the focus of the film, which might make the title sound misleading if you think your gonna get some sort of monster flick. Not a movie I would watch again as much of what made the Harry Potter films so special is lost.
5/10 - Mediocre
(This is my first review)
| 5 |
Direction & Acting, both are good, but there is not much content in this one, compared to other movies in the franchise. It's a one time watch movie and if possible watch in 4DX.
| 7 |
This first episode definetly met it main porpouse delivering a good introduction to the character and making me want more of Isaac's enthralling performance and Moon Knight's appearence. I wasn't expecting that much of action and thrilling in the series prologue, really hope the show maintain that same energy and rhythm until the end.
| 7 |
The popular show "Taaza Khabar" received high praise for its well-crafted characters and engaging story. Although the plot wasn't entirely unique, the show managed to keep viewers on the edge of their seats from beginning to end. The acting was truly exceptional, with special recognition going to Bhuvan Bam for his outstanding performance.
"Taaza Khabar" was a heartwarming family drama that touched upon a variety of themes and issues. Despite a few questionable scenes, the show was well received by audiences for its positive message and relatable characters. The portrayal of a future where individuals can see their fate through their smartphones was both fantastical and thought-provoking.
The film industry in India has been in dire need of fresh, innovative content and "Taaza Khabar" delivers just that. With its masterful scriptwriting and talented cast, the show provides a refreshing change from the typical Bollywood fare. There was no evidence of nepotism, only raw talent was given the opportunity to shine.
This show resonates with the middle-class population, particularly young men who can relate to the struggles and triumphs depicted on screen. The show is a welcome change from the typical Bollywood content that often features excessive nudity and graphic violence. Instead, "Taaza Khabar" showcases a comedic and fictional tale that has been critically acclaimed for its wholesome content.
In conclusion, "Taaza Khabar" is a must-watch for anyone in search of a well-written, entertaining, and family-friendly show. The show has received rave reviews for its exceptional cast, compelling storyline, and meaningful messages. Whether you're a fan of drama, comedy, or both, "Taaza Khabar" is sure to provide hours of enjoyment.
| 8 |
EvrythEver about the movie, be it the screenplay, cinematography, VFX or the music, was spot-on. The actors played their parts very well. It didn't feel like I was watching a Bollywood movie as it didn't have any cheap item numbers or a horrible romance. Hats off to the creators! Being the daughter of an Army man, I am completely satisfied with how the Indian Army is portrayed in the movie.
| 10 |
I've really enjoyed the series. Its just too bad there are almost no wonen and minorities are shown in a bad steriotipical way.
| 8 |
The Russo Brothers will be forever known as the directors that failed a franchise and insulted the very fans that embraced it.
I have no idea why they felt their finished product would pay homage to Stan Lee's legacy or the characters he brought to life but this "closure" to a decade of greatness was, in fact, the most disappointing 3-hours of character assassination in cinematic history.
| 2 |
"Dark's nothing to be afraid of. In fact, I'd go as far as saying there's nothing to be afraid of. Anywhere.
The strongest person in the world is the person who isn't scared to be alone.
It's other people you got to worry about. Other people. They'll tell you what to do, how to feel...
Before you know it, you're pouring your life out in search of something other people told you to go look for.
Some day you're gonna be all alone. So you need to figure out how to take care of yourself." (The Queens Gambit S1:E5 "Fork")
Catch The Queens Gambit on Netflix.
It's absolutely brilliant and moving. A real surprise for a great series that refreshes the mind and heart.
Btw.... this is an effd up view that a mother told her young daughter that did great damage.
There is the key to this developing story that you can follow as she struggles to find the truth of herself, and about others in her world as well.
| 8 |
I can scarcely believe that this is in line for best pcture and best director Oscars. For me it seemed to be an OK movie with a good movie trying to get out. This is almost the definition of a movie where the direction just hasn't quite nailed it. Perhaps the casting was the problem - Jennifer Connelly was OK but Russell Crowe just never really seemed convincing in the part. He did his best but I never really believed he was doing anything other than acting a part. Oh well............ 5/10
| 2 |
Definitely one of the greatest films ever made, u can't even call this a sequel, it's sooo much more than that, the film mixes the past and present very very beautifully. This film sent shivers down my spine the whole time, with its incredible writing,directing and acting which is another level, if I watched this film 5 years ago, I wouldn't have understood why it's so great, but now that I'm a lot older and finally understand what real cinema is I can say that this film is one of the greatest films I've ever watched. I'm a huge fan of the godfather now
| 10 |
Although I'm not a big fan of musicals, I've decided to give this film a try. I had good experiences with some movies of the genre before, and actually never had a really bad one so... why not?
Since the first sequence, something started to bother me: things seem... off. Place, habits, coreographies, songs itself. The movie never tells you the year, but by the scenario, you can imagine the age it occurs, by late 1800's to early 1900's. And it's based on real characters. And it's okay to create dysthopia, but this isn't clearly a good one. So why do coreographies with Michael Jackson moves, songs that sound so contemporary and characters that act that they belong to mixed eras?
OK, the characters being so advanced and open minded are the base of the objective of the movie. So let's not sin this. But you never feel the depth of them. You got a lot of great stories that could be told and the movies focus only in it main character, an ambitious man that takes advantage of the "freakies". His actions are quite mixed up and don't make you want him to suceed - actually you do so the others can suceed, but not him.
This happens mostly because this movie have no plot. Probably they write this thing in an afternoon. You identify like three major events and the way the movie leads you to them is always cliché. While they are singing a bad song, you always know what will happens in the next 15 minutes and the duration of the music is just a torture because you just want to be surprised by something but it never happens.
The movie has a formula, a really boring one. Goes like this: music > three lines of simplistic dialogue like "oh she is mad at me" "what you gonna do?" "i have to make her happy!" > music. The actors are clearly lost in most of the scenes, completely unenvolved with the script.
And the songs are so identical, there are two or three that really stand up. Specially when they decide to give the hairy woman a space and let Hugh Jackman and Zac Effron go take a coffee. The movie needed more sequences and songs like that.
And, boy, the editing. I never get bothered by chroma key, most of the time I don't even perhaps it. But in this movie the difference in ilumination will denounce the absurd usage of green backgrounds. Again, not a total problem as it creates a kind of atmosphere. But some simple errors in the editing make the chroma key scream at you and shows that this movie had no purpose but to make money.
It's a shame, because probably, with a cast full of stars and all this production, this movie had a lot of money to spent. But they chose only aesthetiques over content, and even in the focus they are totally unimpressive. At the end, The Greatest Showman is just like the main character: it bases itself in money ambition, a lot of lights and faking.
| 3 |
Gravity accomplished something that many realistic space movies usually lack and that's visual entertainment, which is what this movie is, visual entertainment. yes this story is criticized for its weak story but as I said it's a new chapter because with today's technology the visual effects are outstanding and with the right director and story there will be a perfect realistic Sci-Fi movie.
| 7 |
The first episode is an absolute disappointment. The dragons looks like cartoon, CGI sucks and the casting sucks. Wait and her this, nope that cant be a got spin off 👎
| 1 |
Compelling and involving.
Really good plot and story line with plenty of twists and turns. Excellent.
| 7 |
The first Ironman movie was a joyous revelation. This is unfortunately full of hateful depressing rubbish. Nobody understands Ironman and they would rather dislike that understand. The movie is annoying and predictable. Much potential is there in this - to quote Yoda the the movie reviewer, but wasted it is. Too much time is wasted on substance abuse, mood swings and hateful surroundings. You can find enough of that in reality. The beautiful chemistry between Pepper and Tony Stark in the first movie has been totally laid waste here - now its just unpleasant antagonism in most of the movie. Even Sam Jackson. Even he. When he turns up is annoying. They are making a third one - lets hope if finds the fun again.
| 4 |
I see it's rated at 7.9 out of 10. That's a pop culture change when you get to an 8. See Star Wars for an example. The good is the action, but wait we saw some of these in movies already. Fight scenes were good. The story? Kinda weak, I would say it's NOT the best Mission Impossible movie.
| 5 |
The budget for production and the established GoT and Song of Ice Fire worlds make it kind of ok sometimes. The show itself...It just isn't good. Looks cool and every so often it will relate to GoT and that's fun I guess; but lots seem forced and lazy.
If this exact show came out on ABC or FOX before GoT dropped and didnt have quite this level of production value It would have a 6 on here and no second season.
Many of the actors and actresses are amazing. I would have given it a 7, weeks ago mostly due to performances. Those seem to be fading as well and I'm not a fan of the newest actress portrayal of her character. I wont say who at risk of spoilers
The dragons are super cool though. I give it a 4 but just the dragons make it at least worth a shot in case it gets better.
| 4 |
Started off great and gripping. They could have condensed this down into a mini series - it lost me between episodes 4 and 7, but I felt like I had to follow through with the series.
| 5 |
Iron man 2 is a average movie unlike its predecessor which was establishing a great superhero franchise.
| 7 |
This isn't quite as powerful as the first Godfather, done two years earlier, but it isn't far behind. It's another magnificently filmed effort, wonderfully acted and a hard film to stop once you've put it in your tape or DVD player.
What makes this a notch below the first Godfather is the absence of Marlon Brando and a little too much disjointedness with flashbacks. Also missing from this film was the volatile James Caan. He was shown in a flashback scene near the end, and that was it.
One thing was just as good if not better than the first film, and that was the cinematography. The browns, blacks, greens and yellows are just great treats for the eyes. I especially love the Italian houses and scenery. Why this was not even nominated for an Academy Award in cinematography is mind-boggling.
The story centers around the brutal vengeance of youngest brother Michael (Al Pacino). It also gives a good demonstration of how the gangster lifestyle may look attractive on the outside but really is an unhappy one despite the wealth.
There are some excellent supporting performances in this film, too. I especially would cite the roles played by Michael Gazzo and Lee Strassburg.
| 9 |
After watching Sacred Games, I can proudly say that Indian cinema has that wonderful brilliance and talent that we have been waiting for. This is basicaly the Narcos of India. Anurag Kashyap and Vikramaditya Motwane have done a splendid job.The first and the foremost thing is the story written by Smita Singh, Vasant Nath & Varun Grover, is riveting. Kudos to the cast. Nawazuddin Siddiqui,Radhika Apte & Saif Ali Khan for such a wonderful portrayal of characters. The camera work and the gripping screenplay are a plus. I'm so happy that a platform like Netflix is giving the real cinema of India a chance to prove themselves. Its a revolution in the Indian cinema and hope to see many more pieces of art like this one. PS: With Nawazuddin Siddiqui & Radhika Apte would have loved Rajkummar Rao in one of the character's.
| 9 |
SYNOPSIS: It appears that HYDRA has infiltrated S.H.I.E.L.D and are hatching a plan that will end up killing millions. It's up to Captain America (Chris Evans) and some other to prevent this, however, they have to get through The Winter Soldier first.
REVIEW: The Russo's are here! It's actually crazy how much of a step forward this film is from every film is before it. The technical aspects of this film are spot on. The choreography of this film was so far ahead and above any of the MCU films before it. The directing style is on another level and I don't know how the Russo's do it. They take a relatively mediocre plot and a not very interesting character like "The Winter Soldier" and make it one of the most interesting films and one of the most badass villains in the entire MCU. You feel every punch and kick. Finally, a normal human goes flying when being kicked in the chest by a superhuman Chris Evans. Then you have the plot twist when you find out who The Winter Soldier is and that entire aspect was very interesting and a "holy s***" moment. This film literally has Robert Redford! Like, come on! One issue I had with the film was at the end when someone doesn't die that should very clearly been dead. Like there's no way any regular human ever lives from it. I won't go further in the small chance someone who hasn't seen the film is reading this. In conclusion, this is one of the best films in the entire MCU and I can't wait to see it again. 8.9/10.
| 8 |
I honestly don't get this movie, it's all over the place and I gave the stars for the effects which were great as usual but that's it.
It's extremely fast paced so I can't keep up. I sat through it all feeling quite perplexed !!!!
I gave it 3 stars and that's for the great effects as always but there isn't any spoilers on this review.
| 3 |
...well not exactly but it was the best title that I could think of for this impressive supernatural horror from Down Under (Australia). A group of teenagers are able to contact the dead by holding an embalmed hand and saying "Talk to Me" followed by "I let you in", it's a bit of fun at first but soon spirals into an horrific nightmare. This makes a very interesting alternative to the usual Ouija board shenanigans. In the opening scene we get hit with our first shock plus our first taste of the cool banging soundtrack that pops up throughout the film. The movie was made on a relatively small budget but the acting is very good and the many special effects are incredibly gruesome (in the UK it is rated BBFC 15 but don't be fooled by that, this movie will please most gore fans). As is so often the case the "teens" are played by actors who are obviously older. Lead Sophie Wilde as Mia was 25 but given her fantastic performance I can easily overlook that. Talk to Me is a genuinely creepy movie though the butch Hayley (Zoe Terakes) was at least as scary as any of the spirits! I have to admit that the ending was quite predictable but it ended with a bang none the less. I really enjoyed watching this on the big screen at a local cinema, for their directing debut Danny and Michael Philippou are two names that should hopefully be worth looking out for in the future. Their debut is a fantastic alternative to the heaps of horror movie dross that America churns out.
| 8 |
Movie: Queen Language: Hinglish Running Time: 2 h 26 mins Director: Vikas Bahl Main Cast: Kangana Ranaut, Rajkummar Rao Genre: Drama Available on: Netflix
Rating: 10/10
"Main india se hoon, Rajouri. Apne honeymoon pe akele aayi hoon!"
When Rani's marriage gets cancelled by her fiance, she decides to go on her honeymoon to Paris, all on her. A girl who never left her own city, alone, will she able to live in Paris, all by herself?
Beautiful film. Loved it. It dealt with beautiful topics. Watched the movie six times. Nothing to explain just watch it.
Overall, it's a beautiful movie.
. Review by Aarya Jadhav.
| 10 |
First off, this is a very boring movie. secondly, The script makes no sense.
1/10
| 1 |
First season was excellent, but second is not.
Martin Short and Steve Martin are brillian, but... Selena Gomez is not a good actress, in fact she is terribly bad. And Amy Schumer? Really? She is not funny or anything.
I keep watching because story is interesting and funny and scenes are nice, and want to see what will happen next. All in all a good series.
| 8 |
Boring story, boring Characters, lame. 9 rating ya if the scale went to 100. It takes way to long before it becomes somewhat watchable. By then I quit caring and wanted to move on. There are so much better animes out there to watch then this overrated garbage.
| 4 |
So good. I watched the whole first season in one day. But I also see lots of flaws.
The most important flaw is the lack of bright elements. Continuous dark things are shown to us one after another which drowns us. Even the scenes that seem to be bright are, in fact, dark because they show hypocrisy in the background. The colors are always dark and gloomy, most conversations are full of lies, and hypocrisy, selfishness, spite, hate, greed, and evil are given to us without breath. This rate is like 10% bright to 90% dark in the series and over time it drowns the brain. Such series should be at least 70% dark, 30% bright, or 60 to 40 is the best. In bright elements, colors need to be vivid and clear, and they should have something that makes us laugh; romantic, fun, childlike stuffs are needed. Also, balloons, festivals, dances, friendship, relatives... the nature, butterflies, the greens, the smell of the wet earth, the bounce of the blue water...
| 8 |
The story just doesn't flow. It has been cut too short, probably for the kids sake. It simply doesn't work. Besides the child actors it seems like all the crew were kids. While there was action and comedy it didn't hold together. Maybe the screenplay was in srong order? The too main characters, Bikly and his friend were very good and villain better than the adult hero. As a whole I blame to movie being cut wrong. It is a mess. I hopr any 14 year old loves it though. The last battle includes fantasy for the girls, too. The coolest thing in this movie is last few seconds. The closing act. I can still see it in slow motion. 4 stars the child actors + one more for the okay villain loosing many for the cut and story
| 5 |
I got to confess I was not excited about The Witcher, but the first episode is just awesome, so I decided to keep watching, and it just got better. Henry Cavill fits perfect as geralt. Yennefer has one of the best development, and Ciri is what brings humanity to the show. The visual effects are perfect, while the script still needs some improves. If you should watch it? Hell yeah BUT FIRST: There are 3 timelines on the show, one for which character. Yen has the older one, followed by Geralt and the Ciri (present).
| 9 |
Read carefully because I can only write this once ! ---
-- This movie is a piece of crap.
And if you don't get the 'Allo Allo' reference -- too bad.
| 1 |
I have just watched "The Matrix", and I was very disappointed. I had heard it was a real good movie, and it was placed as #40 at IMDb, so I had some expectations.
After watching the first half hour I could see that it wouldn't be one of my favorites. It was more likely that it would be the most disappointing movie ever, but the action in the second half of the movie was pretty good made, so it saved the movie from being a complete disaster.
The story in The Matrix was so stupid that I considered stop watching the movie, but I had to watch it all so I could rate it here on IMDb.
Normally I like movies with "the chosen one" like Star Wars and Lord of the Rings, but The Matrix was so stupid. The actors constantly repeated "he is the one", I think it would be enough to say this three or four times.
I really don't understand how The Matrix could be in the top-250 at IMDb, but some people like movies with stupid stories if just the action is good. This movie does not deserve more than 4/10.
| 4 |
If you are the one person who hasn't seen this movie, GO SEE IT! Every scene makes you laugh your a55 off!!! Probably the funniest movie of our generation. I highly recommend you see this film it was awesome in so many ways. You will walk out of the theater praising McLovin and quoting all sorts of lines with your friends. h-i-l-a-r-i-o-u-s The many scenes containing McLovin and the cops is soooo funny. Basically McLovin "makes" the movie. Scenes with Evan and Seth are pretty funny too. Unless you completely dislike comedies, GO SEE THIS MOVIE!!! You will enjoy it, trust me on it.
I am...McLovin hahaha
| 10 |
Even though he was around and in great things before this movie. This is where he gained most of his notoriety and deservingly so. It also launched Jonah hill's career and reminded us why we like Michael Cera so much.
| 9 |
Chernobyl is one of the greatest man made disasters in history. It was so tremendous it properly frightened the world from nuclear power. But how much did the world really know? The Soviet state of Russia was so dictatorial about information and controlling information that it was hard to know what really happened.
"Chernobyl" is a tremendous miniseries that gives the world the pieces of the puzzle it has always been missing. The writer and producer, Craig Mazin, dives deep into the technical and scientific side of the story, yet dumbs it down for us viewers that aren't familiar with nuclear fission or the operations of a nuclear reactor. He finds clever ways to insert elementary explanations for us laymen to grasp the concept.
But the technical part of the show was simply one aspect. Larger than the physical disaster was the state created disaster. Is there anything more dangerous than arrogance and ineptitude? That's exactly what Chernobyl was and it is a most dangerous mixture.
"Chernobyl" is about a disaster, but it's also about a despotic regime, arrogant ministers, and misinformed subjects. But it was also about heroism, self-sacrifice, and speaking truth to power.
I've never seen a show or movie that has made me feel thoroughly sympathetic about Russia or Russians. "Chernobyl" does for Russians what "Das Boot" did for Germans and more so. "Chernobyl" is an incredible story that's told in an incredible manner about an incredible catastrophe.
| 9 |
It is such a simple movie with IMHO very bad sound tracks
| 3 |
Cavill nails it as Geralt, so that is not what I write this review. Jaskier (why not Dandelion?) is ok as well. Monsters so far are also pretty cool.
Other than that, I am disappointed... virtually none of the other characters (especially Yen, Triss, Ciri and now in season 2 Vesemir, Lambert, Eskel, etc) impress me, or make me care about them like I do in the three games.
But maybe it is me complaining since I played all three games and grew to love those characters. I hope for those who did not, it turns out differently.
| 8 |
If you feed on dark, psychotic and serial killer movies, then this is a perfect series to watch. But I honestly felt that Anthony Hopkins was the best Hannibal ever. He just gave more life and meaning to the character. Doesn't mean mads mikelsen was bad, it's just that the justice to the character was not fully done. At times the story just gets too stretchy that u lose interest. Worst part of the series is when Hannibal is jailed and the part where dragon comes. It's just too boring at that point and u either expect Hannibal to be released from prison or the series be over. Climax was unexpected one if you haven't read the book. Overall a good series.
| 7 |
I liked the other John Wick's. This one was over the top ridiculous. From the blind man that was somehow a better swordsman than everyone and a better shot than everyone to the fat guy that somehow could fight like chuck norris... The movie is about 2:45 with at least 2:15 of that time gun fights at close range where everyone gets hit but no one seems to die.
Yes, I realize it's a movie but the unrealistic activities are way too much.. seems more like a version of the animated Batman show from the 70's where the bad guys just keep coming out.... Over and over again...
Super explosive fight scenes but no plot whatsoever... very disappointed. I paid $20 for this crap.
| 2 |
First of all, if you're the type of person who doesn't like the style, well, I won't be able to entice you, I'm sure. But I personally adore the animation style. It is so dynamic and interesting. Movement looks incredible and i like that it's sort of like watching many styles come together.
Story wise, though, this is unbeatable for me. What is so great about a well crafted story is often it's specificity. People sometimes make the mistake of trying to tell a very generic story; one where they are very obviously trying to make a character a blank slate and allow for a vicarious experience of sorts.
But the more specific a story is, the more a person will connect to it simply be virtue that at the heart of every person, we are similar. I've never played ping pong. I don't know anything about the game. And while this story is about the game-more so, about interrogating "game" itself-its also about what makes an impression on you when you're young.
It's about remembering who you are through the eyes of someone else. Its about joy being indomitable, but often discarded as lesser than emotion by society.
It's about growing up and finding some kind of agency in the world. Wether by connections to people, or the associations you've made along the way that ground you in the person you are today.
So like all good stories, in its specificity, we find that it is about many things. Almost certainly you will find something moving here.
| 9 |
I lived in the Soviet Union, I live in Russia, I was much interested in this tragedy. And I keep worrying that someone perceives it as having at least some relationship to the truth. In each frame a lie, people act and talk is not even close as the Soviet people, something that was, in reality, is not even close to the attitude to what is shown in the series. Everything's a lie, I feel sorry for the people who are so blatantly cheating, trying to replace the truth with emotion. This series is exclusively anti-Russian propaganda, in everything. Even the colors of the frames are such as to cause negative emotions. The plot is mediocre, as well as the game actors. People's behavior looks like they are from another planet, the Russians are not like that. You try to cheat in every frame and every fact.
| 1 |
So it seems the Disney takeover of MCU is leading more and more to a rejection of the adult audience. This show is a prime example. Dialogue is so cliche and cheesy, and plot plays with complicated concepts in a terribly sloppy manner. Oh, and they invented a brand new form of incest. Well done, Disney.
| 3 |
🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻👌👌🤘🏻👌🤘🏻👌🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻
| 10 |
So formulaic, cheesy and sloppy that it would make the fake writers of the fake Indiana Jones knockoff embarrassed. Episode 5 was amazing and pushed the MCU in a new direction but this undercut the whole series and character. Never been more disappointed by a Marvel show not named Iron Fist.
| 2 |
I don't know what to say the movie was going in a good direction but suddenly the act and the senario is getting way worse that madee stopped watching the movie to the end.
| 3 |
The hype about it is much bigger than the quality of Series. Yes, it's very good but not the best.
| 8 |
In one word sure. Superb direction Superb cinematography Superb Cast Superb timing of launch
| 10 |
I went to see this movie for a second time today. In part because I enjoyed it so much the first time, in part because I had questions about it that required a second viewing.
Overall, I really think it's a wonderful movie, well-acted throughout.
But, as some previous viewers have remarked, it is almost two separate movies: the story of the Ellison family going through emotionally hard times, and Monk's decision to take on the "serious" fiction publishing establishment to show just how superficial they are when it comes to their publication of novels by and about Blacks.
There is a connection, yes: Monk convinces himself to publish a trash Blacksploitation novel in part by saying that he needs the money to take care of his mother, who is entering into dementia. But lots of great writers have written "easy" potboilers for money when their serious fiction wasn't making any. It would have been easy to assuage his conscience on that issue - as Sintara Golden evidently has - without developing the extensive family issues. Monk's agonizing about "selling out" is one of the least convincing parts of the movie, at least to me.
Those family issues are well developed, and often beautifully acted and filmed. But that does not mean they are really essential to what sets this movie apart as different and particularly interesting, at least as I see it.
So I would have cut back significantly on the family issues --perhaps even to the point of eliminating the sister Lisa's character, though she is well played by Tracee Ellis Ross -- so as to be able to develop the other aspect of the movie in two hours.
And there is lots that could be developed there. For example:
Where does Monk get a knowledge of urban Black English -- or at least what middle-class Americans imagine to be such -- if he grew up in an upper-middle-class family with a beautiful home and attended Harvard? We get an inkling of what might have been when we see him in bed watching a Blacksploitation movie for a minute or two, but this could have been developed into a significant, and funny, part of the movie. How would an upper-middle-class Black academic with an upper-middle-class upbringing go about learning "the lingo" well enough to fake out not just over-educated middle-class white readers, but also intelligent Black readers like Coraline? There could even have been talk of his trying to find his "roots," which urban ghetto life was not, tied in with the the fact that Leslie Uggams had starred in that series.
I would also like to have seen Sintara Golden's character developed further. She's obviously an intelligent woman, and in her scene with Monk during the Literary Prize committee lunch break we see her admit that she wrote her "ghetto" work to appeal to liberal white readers. But was that compromise easy for her? She says she did a lot of research. What sort of research?
She also catches Monk off-guard when he talks to her about "the potential" of Black people, which she says shows that he doesn't really believe that they have achieved anything of true value yet. This could be tied into the sort of fiction he has been writing so far. There isn't much to go on there, but his agent refers to his most recent novel as "the Persians" and Coraline says she has read his book "The Frogs." Has he been adapting Classical models to tell modern stories, like Eugene O'Neill? (We learn from the novel *Erasure* that that was indeed the case.) Does part of his feeling of insufficiency stem from interiorized anti-Black racism? There's little to go on in the movie as it now stands, but that might be a theme to develop. Sintara is intelligent and attractive; he could be attracted to her for all sorts of reasons, see in her both someone he dislikes because she is willing to sell out -- but why is that such a bad thing, as his agent asks him with the Johnny Walker bottles? -- and someone who is more comfortable being Black -- whatever that means to her -- despite her elite education.
And then there is the issue of the movie script Monk finally gives to the superficial movie producer, Valdespino. Why was the latter willing to abandon Monk's trash novel, which was evidently about life in the ghetto, for a story that ends with a tuxedoed man receiving a literary award? Valdespino's choice of endings is deeply cynical, and not stupid. But why did he make the switch, and what to? (In *Erasure* this switch doesn't take place. But in fact the movie deal is much less important in the novel, and does not lead to the end of the story, one of the particularly brilliant innovations created by the movie screenwriters for *American Fiction*.)
There are also hints at potentially interesting things that are introduced but then abandoned. When Monk starts to write his trash novel, he is sitting in a room surrounded by prints of Gauguin paintings. The young thug he creates, with the eye patch and the dew rag, is named Van Go. Why all those references to late 19th century French post-impressionist art?
When Monk first returns to Boston and visits the family home, the house-keeper, Lorena, tells him that he's not overweight, and that "back in Arkansas he'd be a beauty queen." A strange thing to say about an apparently straight man. But then, when Cliff arrives near the end of the film with two young boyfriends, we see that Lorena is not bothered by homosexuality at all. What does Lorena know, or think she knows, about Monk's past?
Again, this is a very good movie just as it is, and well worth watching. I guess it's a tribute to it that it kept me thinking long after I left the theater, considering how the already very good in it could have been developed even further.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was sufficiently intrigued by this film to go out and read the novel, *Erasure*, on which it is based. I was convinced that the novel would focus more on the critique of racism in the American publishing establishment, and that the family drama that several reviewers found less interesting would be much less important.
I was very wrong. If anything, the movie develops the critique of the publishing world, and often very cleverly. The three-part ending of the movie is completely new with the film. So is what development we see of Sintara Gooden's character. We never really meet her in the novel, and there is no discussion at all between her and Ellison. She is not on the five-person literary award panel of judges. Putting her on it, and thereby giving us even what little discussion there is between her and Ellison, was another great script writer innovation.
There are many other major differences as well, which probably explains why the film was titled American Fiction and not Erasure.
So, if this movie can make so many changes in riffing off the novel original, I will hope that a short tv series -- with the same actors, who are uniformly good -- will pick up from here and go on to explore some of the issues raised by the book and the movie.
| 8 |
Red Sparrow is like commuting to work: it takes a long time to get where you already know you're going--and it feels even longer. What I wouldn't have given for an unforeseen turn.
| 5 |
Man, what a movie.
This movie begins with a little girl at an Orphanage, wondering who's going to come see her, and then cuts to the seizing of drugs that are beings transported by a drug lord, by inspector Bejoy (Narain) and team. When the drug lord takes revenge by poisoning the alcohol of a gathering of the police-inspectors, Bejoy has to take the responsibility to transport the fainted inspectors to a clinic that's in a nearby town, while also facing the threat of the drug lord to return back the seized drugs which will kill the guarding humans, who guard the police station which stores the drugs. A lorry is needed to transport the inspectors, which is where Dilli, played by Karthi, comes in to the picture with a swag, who desperately wants to meet his long-lost daughter. To do that, Dilli has to drive the lorry containing the bodies with Bejoy (who vows him his daughter), and the owner of the lorry (who exists for comic relief) to the clinic and then to the police station to stop chaos. That is the main plot of this thrilling film filled with well-choreographed action. To say more is to just destroy the thrill.
To be frank, this is probably one of the best Indian films to come out this year, and probably the best career choice which actor Karthi has ever made. Talking about the acting, Karthi's screen presence is so good that you want more of that pump-into-the-lungs kind of heroism, and George Maryan, as the newly transferred police officer, is the true hero of this story, no doubt. The cinematography, man, is praiseworthy. The mood and tension that is set by various obstacles that these trio encounter is pure cinematic awesomeness. Though, the fight scene involving many people being fist-punched by Dilli in the second-half is kinda unbelievable, I had to give in to the motivation that gives him the strength. And the climax is Diwali Dhamaka, which I will not describe it, just watch it.
10/10 for the attempt to do a Mass-Action film with no masala elements or songs. Only Police and Prisoner working together to save the day.
| 10 |
Good acting can't save this wandering mess - Tarantino committed a fatal sin in cinematography ... a none existent story line. The Sharon Tate reference was weak and has no heart. The reviews were good but I beg to differ - his worst film to date.
| 4 |
This is without a doubt the worst movie that I have ever seen. Terrible acting, slow-moving plot, and absolutely unbelievable fools for characters (no, this does not make for a better movie. Better movies allow the audience to IDENTIFY with the characters). The only thing that could have given this movie a shred of credibility and humor was if it were based on a true story. But surprise, surprise...it wasn't! The writers/producers took a few creative liberties in this story, one of which was the intro which states that it was based on a true story.
Whenever I speak to someone who feels that this was a great movie, their argument for it is typically, "Well, just think about the context. This actually happened! It's based on a true story!" Hmmm...do you believe everything you see in the movies? Maybe you'd better watch out for the Blair Witch the next time you go for a walk in the woods.
| 1 |
Just showing the propaganda against a particular community
| 1 |
I have high hopes for this one considering that I enjoy the first "Knives Out" which is truly a beautifully executed mystery. However, this "Glass Onion" seems to take too long to get going, and by the time the plot twists and turns happen, you feel no real investment in these characters. Most are uninspiring except for Daniel Craig's Benoit Blanc and Janelle Monae's Andi. Thank goodness for Monae's performance with a perfect mix of sensitivity and humor, the movie is redeemed on some level. Monae reminds me of a young Halle Berry who can convincingly portray a working-class role then switch it up to an elite snob role in the next second. I hope Monae gets more lead roles in the future as she is compelling to watch and is truly talented. Besides this, the storyline in this movie is nothing to be excited about. It's a bit like another recent movie "The Menu," which could have been great, but just gets by on the performance of its female lead.
| 7 |
They all smell the same.
It's the semi basement smell or the subway.
Point of this movie is - don't get greedy.
It doesn't take money to be nice.
Who gives a cleaning service all that info ?!?!
| 5 |
Oscar Isaac in his prime here, fresh off leading role in Inside Llewyn Davis (2013) and before his sci-fi year with Ex Machina (2015) and Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015), delivers deadpan and conviction as a medium-size business owner faced with financial, fiscal, legal and physical trouble. He stars opposite Jessica Chastain, Oscar-nominated for The Help (2011) and Zero Dark Thirty (2012) who plays his wife which turns out to be the most complex and interesting character. Jessica had "A Most Stellar Year" with Interstellar (2014) and her riveting performance here. She did carry her lesser role in The Martian (2015) the next year, proving to be the sci-fi year for her as well.
Isaac is a force as Abel Morales and the writing and directing builds characters and tension to a boiling denouement. He has good scenes with his wife, lawyer, employees, friends, competitors and law enforcement. He even acts a crucial scene in his native Spanish. However a deleted scene where his character scolds his oldest daughter off the road is perhaps even better than all the scenes actually left in the final cut. Make sure to look for it in the DVD/Blu-Ray.
Jessica plays the tough Anna Morales and the script could have windows for her to overact, but she is mostly able to nuance her performance and keep it believable and engrossing. Her scenes with her husband are the best, but she manages to protect his and their interests in others.
J.C. Chandor who was nominated for Best Writing, Original Screenplay for Margin Call (2011) writes a compelling story with some strong dialogue. He directs his two leads and creates a mood of suspense and thrill as we feel for the characters their bonds, their struggles and their fate.
A stunning crime drama that creeps on you and leaves you wanting more with a succulent last act. A lot of superb details in the script and a near flawless execution. Just shy of Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright power couple as the Underwoods in House of Cards (2013).
| 8 |
Could've been a good, albeit predictable and cliché movie... Instead, it's wrongly paced, poorly acted and just plain confusing.
Character development is very poor, you keep asking yourself why would Russians talk in English 99% of the time even among themselves and, all of sudden, say just two or three words in Russian just to get back to English again.
Jennifer's accent is simply atrocious. Acting is alright for the most part. Screenplay is a nightmare. I can see why the studio bought the idea, but the execution was just a plain mess. Just skip this one, nothing to see here...
| 3 |
This is the best marvel series so far. I've watched three of them and this was by far the best out of the three. Excellent series. Well written, well executed. Looking forward to the next installment.
| 9 |
This movie has a very grandiose ambition of touching upon the hurt and disenchantment caused to people of a certain colour, who are mostly American by nationality. It also touches upon the self-alienation brought upon many by the events of September 9/11.
At the core of the movie is a story and a script with deep and universal symbolism with characters that represent innocence, mistrust and hope.
Caked over that promising central basis of the film is unfortunately a lot of bad direction, loose screenplay and a wholeheartedly bad, unnecessary and wretched use of music and emotional drama. What could have been a resoundingly powerful journey of poignant cinema, instead comes across as a commercial hijacking of sensitive issues.
At its heart, it is still a film with a positive message from the production company, but in terms of execution it shows all the limitations of the cast and crew behind it.
It is nevertheless a bold venture in it's scope of spelling out a genuine emphasis on the morals of unity and hope by weaving the different issues and obstacles depicted in the story into one cohesive whole that might take audiences a long time to be endeared to, on the same level as the previous films from Karan Johar.
The movie is in many ways similar to the main character, who can apparently learn to fix anything. He is a jack-of-all-trades, master of none. And as such, is the movie. There is too much scope on covering all the different issues, and not enough emphasis on a coherent narrative with steady characters.
There is none of the fun factor of the 90's Dharma movies. The music here is dry and dull, possibly to infer a sense of the austerity of the faith of the main character.
Overall, a movie not to be missed because the story here makes it unmissable. And that's a line which is too cheesy even for this movie.
| 7 |
Secret Superstar looks like it is a sequel to Aamir Khan's 2007 psychological film "Taare Zameen Par" where Darsheel Safary is replaced by a not-so-unknown "Fresh-Face" Zaira Wasim. Zaira Wasim totally steals the show. Also, the contribution to the film's elegance made by Meher Vij is worth-applauds.
Secret Superstar is a story of a young girl named Insiya (Zaira Wasim) who wants the whole world to listen to her fresh voice. She is strongly supported by her on-screen mother (Meher Vij). But, Insiya's wings are pulled off by her father (Raj Arjun).
But, the twist in the by-time extra-emotional film, is added by a funky-chunky musician and singer Shakti Kumaarr who is better known for his unusual behavior but strongly supports the ideas of Insiya.
The movie is a best for to be known "psychologically emotional." Secret superstar is another best Aamir Khan Film to watch out with your family this weekend after his blockbusters such as Dangal, PK and Taare Zameen Par.
| 8 |
The concept is good and the story is also ok I'm glad that they don't go with the bad storyline about Hydra something that have destroyed some of the movies for me. The thing I thought was bad in the first ep is the casting not of the main characters but of almost every one in the background was just out of place and I guess it's bad directing the extra crew, walk in. It just didn't make sense sometimes. But this was the first episode and guess they will get it working soon.
| 6 |
RELEASED IN 1974 and directed by Francis Ford Coppola, "The Godfather: Part II" is part sequel and part flashback to the first film with the main story focusing on Michael (Al Pacino) in the late 50s as the stalwart Corleone son who has taken over as 'Godfather' with events taking place at Lake Tahoe, Miami, New York City, Havana (during the Cuban Revolution), and a congressional committee in Washington DC. The flashbacks concern Vito Corleone as a kid in Sicily and his arrival to Ellis Island with the story focusing on Vito's life in New York City when he was in his mid-to-late 20s (Robert De Niro) where he cleverly and boldly establishes himself as the formidable new Don.
MAIN CAST: Robert Duvall plays the adopted lawyer son, Tom, while John Cazale appears as the weakest Corleone son, Fredo. Diane Keaton returns as Michael's wife, who tries to put out of her mind her husband's shady business with Talia Shire reprising the role of Corleone sister, Connie.
The good news is that the flashbacks pertaining to Vito (De Niro) are good, starting with the shocking opening scenes. The saga of Michael (Pacino), by contrast, is relatively dull, particularly the first half, which mostly involves overlong scenes of talky drama. Michael's story simply lacks the energy and highlight-every-15-minutes of the prior film. Moreover, Pacino is thoroughly one-note solemn as Michael, lacking the character's interesting story arc in the first installment and the dimension of the third. I'm not blaming Pacino, as he simply played the role as written and does it well. I'm just saying that he's not a very captivating character, particularly compared to Brando or De Niro as Vito. He's just too one-dimensional and therefore uninteresting. Thankfully, things perk up in the second half culminating with an explosive showdown between Michael and Kay, which had to happen in light of the climatic scene of the previous movie.
The moral of the story rings loud and clear: Choosing the life of organized crime will result in a grim life of constant heartache and premature death all around you. Life's hard enough without taking that shady route.
Bottom line: This is a worthwhile crime drama with some highlights, but IMHO it's not in the same league as the first movie in overall entertainment. It's good for what it is, but it's overrated by people who can't see beyond nostalgia-tinged glasses. If you're a fan of the first film it's almost mandatory that you watch this one; just don't expect the same dynamic greatness. I know it's sacrilege to say this, but Part II is on par with Part III in tone and quality, although I personally give Part III the edge in all-around entertainment value.
THE FILM RUNS 3 hours & 22 minutes (overlong) and was shot in Sicily & Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy; the New York City area; Lake Tahoe, California; Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; Acireale, Catania; Las Vegas; and Washington DC. WRITERS: Coppola & Mario Puzo.
GRADE: B
| 7 |
I have to say that I am really disappointed of the movie as a whole. The Harry Potter movies are easily one of the best and most rewatchable movie franchises so far. And this movie is sadly nothing like the original HP movies. The only thing that is has in common are the special effects (for the apparitions). There was no real dialogue between the characters. Just silly one-liners and the occasional humorous remark. I am also very angered by the fact that they just introduced a new concept (obscurials) to the HP franchise that would literally change everything (if obscurials exist why hasn't Harry Potter become one? After all he fits the criteria).
There was also way too much CGI in the movie. It became a real nuisance after a while. Especially because it wasn't even "up to today's standards".
My final critique concerns the overall flair of the movie. It just didn't feel like it belongs to the magnum opus that is the HP movie franchise. And righteously so; why did they film it in NYC? The HP franchise is the most British thing since James Bond and Doctor Who. I never really realized it before but now that I watched this movie it became very clear to me. You can't just change the location like this and expect the audience to embrace it. Sorry. What's next? Fantastic Beasts in Japan? No thanks. We already have that, it's called Kaiju.
| 4 |
This was a decent film but the Batman from the 90's was better than this, in my opinion. People have jumped on the bandwagon & exulted Heath Ledger but I'm afraid the film itself has been over hyped. That is my opinion, anyway. I think it was a decent film but at the time, with the hype, I was so looking forward to seeing it &, to be honest, it let me down fairly badly. I went to the pictures to see the first Batman, with Keaton & Jack Nicholson & that was a brilliant picture. Although I didn't see this at the pictures, I did watch it with great expectation &, as I say, I wasn't as impressed with it as I thought I would be. I think the hype around Heath Ledgers death at the time was the buoyancy around this film but it didn't live up to the expectations for me. But I hope that you can appreciate that this it my view.
| 3 |
Yaaaaaaawwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnn for nearly 3 hours.
I put this on in the background and found lot's of other interesting things to do. (Call my daughter), tidy up my emails, cut my nails, Facebook. After a lot of fast forwarding, I gave up 90 minutes into it.
Chasing a drone that is nothing like a drone and taking control of it (like that was realistic) what looks like an Atlas rocket on the outside is extremely spacious on the inside. Robbie the robot is made of boxes covered in mirrored fablon (look up seventies material for reviving old furniture). This film is disappointing in every aspect. Unrealistic, poor visualisations, drawn out subject, don't waste 3 hours of your valuable time on it. I've taken 15 minutes out of mine to save you.
| 1 |
She's the same character as on OITNB.
Got bored with it very quickly. Unless it has a real turn that I didn't watch long enough to see? Am I wrong.
| 2 |
This is very goode. Love the actors ane love the plot. Each week I am impatiently waiting for the next episode.
| 9 |
Based purely on having come out of one film and planning to see whatever fit in next, I went to see "Barbie" this weekend. There was much I enjoyed about it, but I'd have loved to have know less about it heading in.
Having previously lived a joyous and perfect life in Barbieworld, stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) starts to have intrusive thoughts about her own mortality, she discovers cellulite on her legs and her feet go flat. Having visited weird Barbie (Kate McKinnon) who explains that to cure these issues, she must travel to the real world and bond with her owner. Ken (Ryan Gosling) only experiences his worth when he's seen by Barbie and, whilst not invited, accompanies her on her adventure. Whilst Barbie learns that her assumptions about Barbie's positive effect on the real world aren't at all accurate, Ken discovers a concept that can revolutionise his life, the patriarchy.
I am far from the first person to comment that "Barbie" is much cleverer, grown up and subversive than it might have been expected to have been, in the hands of other film makers. Gerwig though, constructed a tale that manages to be a love letter to Mattel's iconic character, an honest appraisal of the same characters legacy, a treatise of the position of women in the world, a considered look at male relationships and funny comedy at the same time. It set design and cinematography are great, as are the performances from a surprisingly Anglo-centric cast.
Why haven't I scored it even higher then? Mostly it's my fault, the film has been so dissected and meme-field on Twitter that, even though I wasn't actively looking for it, I knew many of the beats and surprises before I saw the film. I thought that perhaps the films songs could have been a touch better, I know people like them, but I can't really remember any of them just a couple of days later.
I'm annoyed, but not surprised that the lesson Hollywood seems to have immediately taken from this is not, lets let interesting and varied filmmakers have carte blanche to turn properties into interesting films, but instead it's "movies about toys!". I'm bracing for the wall of garbage to come, but I hope we don't forget that, as with "The Lego Movie" you can have a real success with a property if you believe in the creative teams.
| 7 |
This movie is the holy grail for edgy 13-year old edge-lords all over the world. Heath Ledgers Joker is irritating and shows signs of herpes, Rachel is the worst character ever and Batman is played by a lunch-lady who have smoked cigarettes for 40 years. Nolan can not direct a action scene even if his life was depending on it. The dialogue in the movie is cringe-worthy and is written to appeal to middle-class anarchists. "The Dark Knight" (1994) is the definition of Anti-intellectualism. The only good things with the movie is that The Batman suit is kind of cool and that it has a fetching title.
"I can sooo relate to the joooker"
| 3 |
8 years of GOT plus 8 Seasons later and they did not change characters at all. Here we have HOD and 5 episodes in they change characters. And i stopped watching after ep6. Milly fit the character of the princess much better and she looks straight out of GOT. Well now, since i can't watch it anymore after HBO or the Producer or Director or whoever decided to change the character for whatever dumb reason and not thinking of what the viewers might think, i guess i'll go watch other shows. That's not to say i don't like it but i liked the first 5 episodes and i was really dissatisfied and upset to find out after a week of waiting for episode 6, they changed actors. That's a bummer, imagine them changing Olivia in GOT. Right, i didn't think so!!!
| 5 |
Outside of Benoit Blanc having a foghorn leghorn accent instead of french, acting was very good and great cast. Honestly tho, rather a weak plot. Some humorous and cute moments but nothing amazing and the reveal was just...blah.
| 6 |
"Iron Man 2" suffers from an all too familiar problem these days. Hollywood has become so good at giving us great special effects that this is what they are content to do. Plot? Dialog? Bah! Who needs them! We've got great special effects!
Take this as an example of the supposedly funny dialog in this movie: "Where are you going?" "New Mexico." "Land of enchantment." "So I'm told."
Whoa! Zip! Bam! Bing! Move over Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn! Honestly, was anyone really laughing at dialog that lame? The deeper problem isn't just that the dialog is bad, it's that the makers of the movie didn't care! Everything would be forgiven, they felt, because of the wonderful special effects.
I pray that Hollywood soon moves beyond our current "can you top this?" phase and returns to the basics of good film making: Plot, characters, dialog.
| 3 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.