The InnoDB log sequence number is in the future Our site was getting intermittent database errors and I asked my webhost to check what's happening. After some inspection they found that the database has few issues and tried repairing it. Finally I got following message from them- 


  I have attempted every repair on the InnoDB database and we are still
  getting  the InnoDB log sequence number is in the future. At this
  point to get the  ibdata and the iblogfile to match up once again we
  will need to restore the  MySQL directory (which includes databases)
  from the backup we have on the  server. The process should not take to
  long but there will be some downtime  associated with a restore like
  this. If this is not the best time to restore  the MySQL directory I
  can schedule this for a different time. Please let me  know how you
  would like to proceed with this.


Can someone tell me what'd be the best way to address this issue. I really don't want to lose out on any data and want the dB to be repaired. 

PS: If you need more information, please let me know and I'll get it from our web hosts. 

Would really appreciate your help.
What was suggested to you thus far is what can be done to bring the database to a consistent state. 

Here is what you need to know about InnoDB.

First of all here is the InnoDB Architecture in Pictorial Form



Look at the Picture. What components are essentially for InnoDB's self healing (sounds better that crash recovery)?


The Double Write Buffer has the cache of changed blocks to be used for recovery.
The Insert Buffer handles updates to nonunique indexes
The InnoDB transaction logs (ib_logfile0,ib_logfile1) contain Redo Playback Info also used in recovery.
There are undo logs (1023 of them, the maximum number of concurrent transactions)


You need three files for recovery


ibdata1
ib_logfile0
ib_logfile1


The whole datadir folder (/var/lib/mysql) needs to be restored from the same moment in time it was being backed up. If there are no physical copies of datadir from the same moment in time, then log sequence numbers for future transactions can never be referenced correctly.

If you do not trust your host in this matter, perhaps you can get MySQL started with innodb_force_recovery set to an appropriate value.

Here are the values from the MySQL Documentation


  1 (SRV_FORCE_IGNORE_CORRUPT)
  
  Lets the server run even if it detects a corrupt page. Tries to make SELECT * FROM tbl_name jump over corrupt index records and pages, which helps in dumping tables.
  
  2 (SRV_FORCE_NO_BACKGROUND)
  
  Prevents the master thread and any purge threads from running. If a crash would occur during the purge operation, this recovery value prevents it.
  
  3 (SRV_FORCE_NO_TRX_UNDO)
  
  Does not run transaction rollbacks after crash recovery.
  
  4 (SRV_FORCE_NO_IBUF_MERGE)
  
  Prevents insert buffer merge operations. If they would cause a crash, does not do them. Does not calculate table statistics.
  
  5 (SRV_FORCE_NO_UNDO_LOG_SCAN)
  
  Does not look at undo logs when starting the database: InnoDB treats even incomplete transactions as committed.
  
  6 (SRV_FORCE_NO_LOG_REDO)
  
  Does not do the redo log roll-forward in connection with recovery.


Once you select the value you want, start up MySQL with it. Then, perform a mysqldump of all the data. Keep that mysqldump somewhere.


I would set innodb_force_recovery to 6. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData6.sql)
Change it to 5. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData5.sql)
Change it to 4. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData4.sql)
Change it to 3. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData3.sql)
Change it to 2. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData2.sql)
Change it to 1. Restart mysql. Do the mysqldump (MyData1.sql)


You now have 6 snapshots of the data based on how much could be recovered. You would then have to load each MySQLDump into a separate instance of MySQL. You would have to then peruse the data and determine if enough of the data has been recovered. Percona has a Data Recovery Toolkit that would do all this way more efficiently than I am saying it. 

My answer is simply a poor man's approach to this.

I hope this helps !!!