How does postgres use the schema search path when making indexes? Using Postgres 9.1.4 with PostGIS 1.5, as part of a Rails 3.2.x app.

I have a DB containing schemas A and B, with schema A empty and schema B containing tables foo and bar, with indexes on each table in a non-PK field, say email.

If I set my schema search path with SET search_path TO A,B;, then I can run:

CREATE TABLE foo (...);


and it creates table foo in schema A.  The following migration fails, though:

CREATE TABLE bar (...);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_bar_on_email ON bar USING btree (email);


with

Index name 'index_bar_on_email' on table 'bar' already exists


This suggests that create table and create unique index handle the search path differently.  Is there a way to coax PG into making the indexes in schema A?

Update

The issue seems to be related to how Rails interfaces with Postgres.  After the Users table is created, the following queries are run before Rails attempts to create the index:

SELECT DISTINCT i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, t.oid, am.amname
 FROM pg_class t, pg_class i, pg_index d, pg_am am
 WHERE i.relkind = 'i'
 AND d.indexrelid = i.oid
 AND d.indisprimary = 'f'
 AND t.oid = d.indrelid
 AND t.relname = 'users'
 AND i.relnamespace IN (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname IN ('B','A') )
 AND i.relam = am.oid
 ORDER BY i.relname

SELECT a.attnum, a.attname, t.typname
 FROM pg_attribute a, pg_type t
 WHERE a.attrelid = 311384
 AND a.attnum IN (2)
 AND a.atttypid = t.oid


Based on the result of one or both of these, which seem to be schema-agnostic queries, I am guessing that a non-empty return is telling Rails that this index already exists and so it's not even bothering to try.   

For now, I'm just going to rename the indexes, but this might be a bug in the Rails Postgres adatper.
Given the following setup:

regress=&gt; CREATE SCHEMA A;
CREATE SCHEMA
regress=&gt; CREATE SCHEMA B;
CREATE SCHEMA
regress=&gt; SET search_path = B, public;
SET
regress=&gt; CREATE TABLE bar(email text);
CREATE TABLE
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_bar_on_email ON bar USING btree (email);
CREATE INDEX


I cannot reproduce the problem you report in PostgreSQL 9.2:

regress=&gt; SET search_path = A, B;
SET
regress=&gt; CREATE TABLE bar(email text);
CREATE TABLE
regress=&gt; CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_bar_on_email ON bar USING btree (email);
CREATE INDEX


However, rather than using the search_path, it's safer to use explicit schema-qualification. For example, I'd re-write the above as:

regress=&gt; RESET search_path;
RESET
regress=&gt; SHOW search_path ;
  search_path   
----------------
 "$user",public
(1 row)

CREATE TABLE B.bar(email text);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX b.index_bar_on_email ON b.bar USING btree (email);
CREATE TABLE A.bar(email text);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_bar_on_email ON A.bar USING btree (email);


The indexes are automatically created in the schema of their associated table; see:

regress=&gt; \di B.
                  List of relations
 Schema |        Name        | Type  | Owner | Table 
--------+--------------------+-------+-------+-------
 b      | index_bar_on_email | index | craig | bar
(1 row)

regress=&gt; \di A.
                  List of relations
 Schema |        Name        | Type  | Owner | Table 
--------+--------------------+-------+-------+-------
 a      | index_bar_on_email | index | craig | bar
(1 row)


Update based on question change:

Yes, what you've shown does look like a Rails adapter issue. It's checking to see whether the index exists in any schema. It should be checking to see whether the first table of the given name in the search_path has the named index.

I would write the query differently. I'd leave off the join on pg_class entirely, instead using a cast to regclass to handle search_path resolution for me. I'd use the resulting oid to search for the index. Compare original, then updated, below. Note that the updated query does require search_path to be set first.

regress=&gt; SELECT DISTINCT i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, t.oid, am.amname
 FROM pg_class t, pg_class i, pg_index d, pg_am am
 WHERE i.relkind = 'i'
 AND d.indexrelid = i.oid
 AND d.indisprimary = 'f'
 AND t.oid = d.indrelid
 AND t.relname = 'bar'
 AND i.relnamespace IN (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname IN ('b','a') )
 AND i.relam = am.oid
 ORDER BY i.relname
;
      relname       | indisunique | indkey |  oid  | amname 
--------------------+-------------+--------+-------+--------
 index_bar_on_email | t           | 1      | 28585 | btree
 index_bar_on_email | t           | 1      | 28592 | btree
(2 rows)

regress=&gt; SELECT DISTINCT i.relname, d.indisunique, d.indkey, 'bar'::regclass::oid, am.amname
 FROM pg_class i, pg_index d, pg_am am
 WHERE i.relkind = 'i'
 AND d.indexrelid = i.oid
 AND d.indisprimary = 'f'
 AND 'bar'::regclass = d.indrelid
 AND i.relam = am.oid
 ORDER BY i.relname                                                              
;
      relname       | indisunique | indkey | regclass | amname 
--------------------+-------------+--------+----------+--------
 index_bar_on_email | t           | 1      | 28585    | btree
(1 row)