Oracle ram usage higher than memory_max_target To begin, while I've worked with Oracle for many years, I'm far from a DBA.  (and it'll take probably a few weeks before I can get one assigned to look at this.)

I've got an Oracle instance that is consuming way more ram then is set with the memory_target and memory_max_target parameters.

SQL&gt; show parameter memory_target;
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------
memory_target                        big integer 8000M


SQL&gt; show parameter memory_max_target;
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------
memory_max_target                    big integer 9024M


However Oracle is taking up about 11GB of ram at the moment.

AMM is turned on

SQL&gt; show parameter pga_aggregate_target
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- -------
pga_aggregate_target                 big integer 0


SQL&gt; show parameter sga_target
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- -------
sga_target                           big integer 0


But oracle is still being a memory hog



When I reduced memory_target and memory_max_target to the current values (down by 2GB each) the only thing that changed was the primary ORCL instance reduced it's memory footprint, but the RCAT instance took up the available freed ram.

The machine has been rebooted with no change in memory consumption.

I'm assuming RCAT here is the recovery catalog, but what would cause it to consume higher memory than is assigned via the memory target params?

Is there another area I should be looking at? (i.e. is memory for the recovery catalog instance controlled by another parameter?)

What additional information would be helpful in narrowing down the issue?


Windows 2012R2
16GB assigned ram
Oracle 18C
Approx 130 sessions with very little activity (basically idle)
Those are 3 seperate instances.

You checked and listed the memory parameters from only 1 instance.

We do not know which instance that is, and we do not know anything about the other 2.

Each instance has its own memory parameters.

None of the instances use more memory than the value listed above.

I see no problem here.