Studying some recent MSO questions made me wonder if this is a good practice?

* [Moderator closing a question twice. Second opinion?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/141952/165773)
* [Why was this question on writing a system tray app closed as Not-Constructive?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/141898/165773)

Same moderator overruling reopen votes of five privileged community members may be perceived as biased subjective judgement: *"seems to be on a roll today" [1](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/476/deceze "quote source"), "Community moderation at its finest" [2](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/141898/why-was-this-question-on-writing-a-system-tray-app-closed-as-not-constructive#comment401869_141898 "quote source"), "eagerly closing" [3](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/141952/moderator-closing-a-question-twice-second-opinion#comment402021_141952 "quote source")* etc.

Would it make less room for tension if second-time closure was performed by another moderator?

---

If I understand correctly, in cases like this "first closer" moderator has an option to signal their evaluation to colleagues using "Other" flag which avoids a [binding close](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/75189/165773 "diamond mods can't close vote without binding") effect.

![http://i.stack.imgur.com/VC71d.png](https://i.stack.imgur.com/VC71d.png "'Recommend to overrule recent reopen and close it again. As I already closed this question before, please another moderator take a look.'")