Update: Anton Menshov admitted to downvoting this post and while Anton Menshov has a downvote on h post, it was not from me.

> 
> yes. I don't appreciate the tone of the original post, and I think it can be formulated way differently. In addition, I do not believe that the research on how the comments work has been done.
> 
> 
> 

---

I commented this

> 
> 'Not to mention these type of endgames are really only studied by GMs because at master level these endgames do not happen enough to justify studying them extensively' --> really? i believe i've encountered single queen vs single rook a few times but with pawns. i know i encountered king queen vs king rook pawnless at least once. [Karsten Müller](https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/36829) even has a chapter on it in volume 3 of h 14 volume endgame course. it seems like a pretty basic thing of course i skipped that chapter lol
> 
> 
> 

[here](https://chess.stackexchange.com/a/22696). It was deleted. Good thing I use [typio](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/typio-form-recovery/djkbihbnjhkjahbhjaadbepppbpoedaa?hl=en).

Why? I am asking if the claims made are indeed true given what I have observed from my own experience.

What am I supposed to do, create a chat and never make another comment? Ask a new question every time I'm not fully confident in an answer?