I was reading an article on dw.com today ([link](https://www.dw.com/de/kommentar-streik-bei-ryanair-endlich/a-44834748)) and came across the following sentence:

> 
> Ryanair als einer der Pioniere der Billigfluglinien hat die Vorlage **geliefert** für Dutzende anderer Airlines.
> 
> 
> 

From what I know of German grammar, the sentence "should" be the following:

> 
> Ryanair als einer der Pioniere der Billigfluglinien hat die Vorlage für Dutzende anderer Airlines **geliefert**.
> 
> 
> 

I'm pretty sure I've come across other examples like this before, where a past participle or verb that should come in final position is followed by a prepositional phrase. In rather long sentences, this actually seems reasonable to me as a non-native German speaker, since it makes the sentence a bit easier to construct and understand.

**My question** is whether this is (technically) correct grammar and whether there is a grammatical rule governing when this can or cannot be done.

My apologies in advance if this has been asked before. I did a quick search and found some similar looking questions that actually deal with different kinds of issues.