I have a question regarding what the LDS Church view of 1 Timothy 3:2 and 3:12 was during the times when they supported polygamy.

**Background information for my question:**

One of the earliest formal statements about polygamy by the Mormon church was [the 1943 revelation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_Latter_Day_Saint_polygamy#1843_revelation) by the founder of the church, [Joseph Smith](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith). This revelation was codified in the 1870s in the church's [Doctrine and Covenants section 132](https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/132?lang=eng).

Paragraphs 61-63 of this section is quoted below.

> 
> 61 And again, as pertaining to the law of the priesthood—if any man
>  espouse a virgin, and desire to espouse another, and the first give
>  her consent, and if he espouse the second, and they are virgins, and
>  have vowed to no other man, then is he justified; he cannot commit
>  adultery for they are given unto him; for he cannot commit adultery
>  with that that belongeth unto him and to no one else.
> 
> 
> 62 And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot
>  commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him;
>  therefore is he justified.
> 
> 
> 63 But if one or either of the ten virgins, after she is espoused,
>  shall be with another man, she has committed adultery, and shall be
>  destroyed; for they are given unto him to multiply and replenish the
>  earth, according to my commandment, and to fulfil the promise which
>  was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for
>  their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls
>  of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be
>  glorified.
> 
> 
> 

The LDS Church did eventually stop promoting polygamy however. The final nail to its coffin seems to have been the [Second Manifesto of 1904](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Manifesto) by then President of the Church, [Joseph Fielding Smith](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_F._Smith).

Still the article "[After the Manifesto: Mormon Polygamy 1890-1906](https://www.sunstonemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/037-8-27-35.pdf)" makes claims that indicate support for polygamy high in the Church hierarchy as late as 1898. The article says on pp. 28-29:

> 
> Among the Quorum of the Twelve and the First Presidency between 1890
>  and 1898, at least 58 percent of the members took an active part in
>  post-Manifesto polygamy. If Matthias Cowley and Owen Woodruff are
>  included, the proportion is 70 percent.[17] Historical records
>  indicate that only two men seem to have had qualms about the
>  continuation of polygamy during President Woodruff’s lifetime: Francis
>  M. Lyman and Lorenzo Snow.[18]
> 
> 
> 

**Qualifications for bishops and deacons in 1 Timothy chapter 3:**

1 Timothy chapter 3 lists the qualifications expected from those assigned to the positions of deacons and bishops in the first century congregations.

[1 Timothy 3:2](https://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/1-tim/3.2?lang=eng) lists some of the qualifications for bishops:

> 
> A bishop then must be blameless, the **husband of one wife**,
>  vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to
>  teach;
> 
> 
> 

And [1 Timothy 3:12](https://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/1-tim/3.12?lang=eng) includes similar requirements for deacons:

> 
> Let the deacons be the **husbands of one wife**, ruling their children
>  and their own houses well.
> 
> 
> 

**Questions:**

Considering the paragraphs quoted from Doctrine and Covenants section 132, and the overall support for polygamy in the Church hierarchy until late 1800's, it seems that at that time a church member could be in good standing with more than one wife.

This seems different from the expectations listed in 1 Timothy ch. 3.

What would have been the LDS Church view of these requirements in 1 Timothy ch. 3 during the time they supported polygamy?