I have come across a supposedly new argument for the existence of God, I would be interested in whether this has been discussed in literature. Is there any resemblance to Plantinga's EAAN?

### The argument

1. If meaning (and explanation) can only be derived from the natural world, then all conceptions of reality are derived from the natural world.
2. If all conceptions of reality are derived from the natural world, then they must be a coherence of meaningful experiences
3. People believe that there is a meaningful transcendent reality (i.e. God) that shares no properties with the natural world.
4. If Premise 1-2, then Premise 3 is a conception of reality derived from the natural world, which content is a coherence of meaningful experiences.
5. No number of meaning experiences can direct one to consider the probability of something meaningful beyond said experiences.

Conclusion: Therefore, Premise 3 is not a conception of reality derived from the natural world.