I've noticed [that](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/284312/use-of-profanity-in-code-blocks) discussion in which the OP was frustrated with mods refusing his flags on posts which he found to contain 'unchaste' words which could cause sinful thoughts by innocent readers. 

Those 'unchaste' words weren't even words, but tag names withing XML, where there are numerous reasons why such tag could be called that, none of them could have anything to do with the 'sinful' English word the OP wants to see everywhere.

Is using the flags that waste moderators' time for own crucade agaist evil a misuse? 

You know, the 'shameless sinners' have created own proposals on Area51, such as [that](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/62814/sex-and-intimacy) or [that](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/67058/atheism). The amount of 'sinfull content' will be immense in comparison to all that 'naughty' variable names and if people will be flag-spamming everything, it could be hard for that communities to concentrate on **real** problems.