As defined here, there are [several no-go theorems](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-go_theorem) in theoretical physics. These theorems are statements of impossibility.

The second law of thermodynamics may be stated in [several ways](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics#Various_statements_of_the_law), some of which describe the impossibility of certain situations. 

The question is: if we view the second law of thermodynamics as a theorem (that is, a proposition that can be either proved to be true or untrue), then is it a no-go theorem? 

I understand that the second law of thermodynamics is a physical "law" in the sense that it is axiomatic in thermodynamics (i.e. we don't prove Newton's laws in classical mechanics), however, one can "prove" the second law of thermodynamics from statistical physics considerations. So, if you'd rather not call the second law of thermodynamics a "theorem," then perhaps it is a "no-go law"?

Perhaps I'm missing a key or subtle point here, all input is very much appreciated. It may be just a matter of terminology, but I'm curious either way.