A recent question posited a fantastic condition then used the [science-based](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/science-based "show questions tagged 'science-based'") tag. In essense, the author wanted a science-based solution to a problem that wasn't science-based in the first place.

We've done a good job of clarifying how the three science tags word ([hard-science](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/hard-science "show questions tagged 'hard-science'"), [science-based](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/science-based "show questions tagged 'science-based'"), [science-fiction](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/science-fiction "show questions tagged 'science-fiction'")). Those three tags are almost unique in that, unlike nearly every other tag, they constrain the answer rather than categorizing the question. But I've encountered a number of questions over the last six months where the question failed to meet the expectations of the tag (i.e., failed to include details, specifications, limitations, or conditions that an answer conforming to the tag would require.

That might be reasonable, but my gut suggests that it's not. How, for example, other than out of shear luck, can a question tagged [hard-science](https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/hard-science "show questions tagged 'hard-science'") be answered if it doesn't provide the conditions and requirements such an answer would demand?

So my question is this: Should we edit the three science tag wikis to require questions that use the tags to also meet the expectations of the tags.