With reference to the following edit: <https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/13411020>

I skipped this review, because if it was me, I would not have edited this, since in my opinion it introduces a non-trivial "fix".

I would have instead left a comment for the person responsible for this answer, explaining the problem, suggesting the fix, and asking them to address it. *Maybe* if they hadn't acted on that comment and it seemed like the user was long gone I would have gone ahead to edit. *Maybe*.

I'm under the impression that edits are more to do with formatting and clarifications, or at most correction of minor typos that enable the code to compile (forgetting a semicolon or whatever). Am I correct in my understanding; should I have rejected this edit?