I've recently found [This Question](https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/235477/where-is-the-cheshire-cat-hiding/236541#236541). It had an answer from a 1 rep user.

**Kenjara Wrote:**

> 
> We found it in an alley on the upper floor of the Disney castle.
> 
> 
> It could of course be random though.
> 
> 
> 

**Kendall wrote:**

> 
> I also found him on the upper level of the castle. He gifts you with 1000 blue sparks :)
> 
> 
> 

Both were posted as answers, yet Kendall answered a week later. As I see it, Kenjara answered the question. Kendall merely said "yea I found it there too. Plus he gives you xyz".

In my opinion, it's not an answer. The answer was already given and the user simply repeated it by saying that he did the same as the guy in another answer, and added a small comment. Yet my flag was declined because

> 
> flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong
> 
> 
> 

Which was not why I flagged it.

So should I just stop flagging "+1" answers? Because that's what that is and a moderator saw it fit to maintain it.