Does any extant tradition claim that the unity of samadhi and prajna^ is actual from the beginning of the bodhisatva path, so that it is available to the neophyte - just with less power of something similar to more advanced bodhisatvas?

^e. g. Chinul:

> 
> Samadhi being prajna, it is quiescent and yet always knowing.
> 
> 
> 

or Platform Sutra:

> 
> To argue whether prajna or samadhi comes first would put one in the same position as those who are under delusion... a lamp and its light.
> 
> 
> 

So you can see, they are one, yet - perhaps - not everyone realizes this in their practice?

Just asking because I think it may be the meaning of human life etc..