I am trying to design power supply for the STM32F446 for my PCB.

I wonder if I should stick to the [Datasheet of STM32F446 Page 71](https://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/technical/document/datasheet/65/cb/75/50/53/d6/48/24/DM00141306.pdf/files/DM00141306.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.DM00141306.pdf) and use two capacitors or be careful about it and maybe just use one 100nF. The picture from Datasheet with suggested values:

[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/MnQGq.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/MnQGq.png)

I started getting these concerns after checking some other designs, where they just used one 100nF capacitor for this micro-controller. As-well after reading this answer on [StackExchange](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/a/327980/221561) about the effect of 'anti-resonance' when using two different values capacitors. He also referenced to [this question](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/320363/antiresonance-of-multiple-parallel-decoupling-capacitors-use-same-value-or-mult) where it was elaborated in more details. In [these slides](http://ntuemc.tw/upload/file/20120419205619a4fcf.pdf) they mention that 'anti-resonance' effect can be reduced by reducing ESL.

I am a bit confused by all these inputs. I think the most trusted source is definitely manufacturer Datasheet, but maybe they assume I would be using some special capacitors (for example ceramic X7R), or something else I am not taking into account. And why other designs don't follow this suggestion. It would be great if you can clarify this.