Remember when Rectangularea gained parliamentary representation?

The regrettably segregated population broke down into parties as follows.
Gerrymandericans (`g`) were concentrated in 4/9 of the land
while Majoricrats (`m`) pervaded the other 5/9.

```

                                  ___________
                                 | g | m | m |
                                 |___|___|___|
                                 | g | g | m |
                                 |___|___|___|
                                 | m | g | m |
                                 |___|___|___|

```

Census results granted just 3 seats, so how to delineate constituencies?

```

   ___________                                                  ___________
  | g   m   m |                                                | g | m | m |
  |___________|                                                |   |   |   |
  | g   g   m |   ?   Or, as was hornswoggled at the time:     | g | g | m |   .
  |___________|                                                |   |   |   |
  | m   g   m |                                                | m | g | m |
  |___________|                                                |___|___|___|
 2:1 Majoricratic                                           2:1 Gerrymanderican

```

Ah politics.
Neither approach could have produced proportional representation.
Everyone was embittered and a clumsy breeding frenzy ensued.
Predictably little miscegeny produced a population more polarized than ever.

> 
> Can you come up with a rectangular map,
>  with more `g`s than above, and even more `m`s,
>  that can be split into rectangular districts **in two different ways**,
>  one way where Gerrymandericans gain representation
>  that is reciprocal of their numbers
>  (that would be 5:4 in the case above, not 2:1 as shown)
>  and the other way where Majoricrats are *proportionally* represented
>  (that would be 5:4 in the case above, again, not 2:1)?
> 
> 
> 

The resulting hypothetical constituencies
are all equally sized and all rectangular,
but not necessarily equally shaped,
and number greater than the original three.

(Note, this was witnessed by someone
 only academically acquainted with parliamentary terminology.
 Any editing to make this more realistic would be appreciated.)