<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/430742/is-there-a-free-version-control-server-provider-for-non-public-projects> was deleted back in October of 2014 (partly by yours truly), and then undeleted this past February by a single moderator.

If this question were asked today, it would be closed and deleted in a heartbeat. It's seriously just a list of link-only answers and product recommendations, and the accepted answer looks like this:

> 
> Give a look to :
> 
> 
> * SVN
> 	+ [XP-Dev](http://xp-dev.com/) (No longer free)
> 	+ [OpenSVN](https://opensvn.csie.org/) (No longer available)
> 	+ [Codebase](http://atechmedia.com/codebase)
> 	+ [Unfuddle](http://unfuddle.com/) (No longer free)
> * Git
> 	+ [XP-Dev](http://xp-dev.com/) (No longer free)
> 	+ [Codebase](http://atechmedia.com/codebase)
> 	+ [Unfuddle](http://unfuddle.com/) (No longer free)
> 
> 
> 

Let's see... "No longer free", "No longer available", "No longer free", "No longer free"... I'm seeing a pattern here. 

Since I'm apparently part of the "They know who they are, and they know what they're doing" Delete gang, I'm going to try something new: instead of simply casting another Delete vote and starting the whole silly process over again, I'm going to take this a learning lesson, and simply ask:

> 
> Why was this undeleted? Why is this question sticking around? Am I fundamentally misunderstanding what counts as a "Should be closed, but not deleted" question?
> 
> 
>