As per [this answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/82873/161106) making tiny edits is not encouraged. Specifically edits that just make a single letter change or just remove salutations and thank yous. I buy it - as this may just tip an answer to be a [community wiki](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts), or even worse be used as a way to [game](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/83557/some-users-gaming-the-edit-system-by-searching-for-misspelled-words) the system for few reps.

As a reviewer, I feel uncomfortable approving such edits and even more uncomfortable rejecting them when [the rejected edits are approved any ways](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316315). I think the reason why such minor edits are eventually approved is that not a lot of 'reviewer' (and editors) are aware of drawbacks of allowing such minor edits.

As a starter I would recommend linking to [Jeff's answer](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/82873/161106) in the 'minor edit' section of Reject dialog and potentially by alerting 'approver' when system detects a minor edit is being approved. Thoughts?

![Minor Edits](https://i.stack.imgur.com/zNneW.png)

Examples? [Here](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316420) [are](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316418) [few](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316428) [edits](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316390) [that](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316388) [I believe](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316416) [should](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316402) [have](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316383) [been](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316417) [rejected](https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/316394). Please note - I don't intent to single out this user. It's just an example I came across that demonstrates this issue.