I am comparing difference in time execution of two breadth first search algorithms. Parallel and non parallel. But for every graph I make, the non parallel version is 10X faster than the parallel one. 

This is parallel Breadth first search. I don't know where the problem is but I suppose somewhere in this method:

```
public static int PBFS(Node start, Node end)
{
    var queue = new ConcurrentQueue<Node>();
    queue.Enqueue(start);

    while (queue.Count != 0)
    {
        bool isFinished = false;
        if (isFinished) break;

        Parallel.ForEach<Node>(queue, CurrentNode =>
        {
            if (queue.TryDequeue(out CurrentNode))
            {
                foreach (Node Child in CurrentNode.Children.Keys)
                {
                    if (Child.IsVisited == false)
                    {
                        Child.IsVisited = true; 
                        if (Child == end) { isFinished = true; return; }
                    }
                    queue.Enqueue(Child);
                }
            }  
            return;
        });
    } return 1;
}

```

This is non parallel BFS:

```
public static int BFS(Node start, Node end)
{
    Queue<Node> queue = new Queue<Node>();
    queue.Enqueue(start);

    while (queue.Count != 0)
    {
        Node CurrentNode = queue.Dequeue();
        CurrentNode.IsVisited = true;

        foreach (Node Child in CurrentNode.Children.Keys)
        {
            if (Child.IsVisited == false)
            {
                Child.IsVisited = true;
                //Console.Write(Child.Name+" ");
                if (Child == end) return 1;
            }
            queue.Enqueue(Child);
        }
        // Console.WriteLine();
    }

    // Console.WriteLine();
    return 0;
}

```