The following post is based on Rails 4.

I am currently looking for a best-practice about the multiple nested resources (more than 1), and the option shallow: true.

Initially in my routes, there was this :

```
resources :projects do 
  resources :collections
end

```

The associated routes are :

```
    project_collections GET    /projects/:project_id/collections(.:format)          collections#index
                        POST   /projects/:project_id/collections(.:format)          collections#create
 new_project_collection GET    /projects/:project_id/collections/new(.:format)      collections#new
edit_project_collection GET    /projects/:project_id/collections/:id/edit(.:format) collections#edit
     project_collection GET    /projects/:project_id/collections/:id(.:format)      collections#show
                        PATCH  /projects/:project_id/collections/:id(.:format)      collections#update
                        PUT    /projects/:project_id/collections/:id(.:format)      collections#update
                        DELETE /projects/:project_id/collections/:id(.:format)      collections#destroy
               projects GET    /projects(.:format)                                  projects#index
                        POST   /projects(.:format)                                  projects#create
            new_project GET    /projects/new(.:format)                              projects#new
           edit_project GET    /projects/:id/edit(.:format)                         projects#edit
                project GET    /projects/:id(.:format)                              projects#show
                        PATCH  /projects/:id(.:format)                              projects#update
                        PUT    /projects/:id(.:format)                              projects#update
                        DELETE /projects/:id(.:format)                              projects#destroy

```

I read in the [documentation](http://guides.rubyonrails.org/routing.html#limits-to-nesting) about the limitation of nested resources :

> 
> Resources should never be nested more than 1 level deep.
> 
> 
> 

Ok. Then, like the documentation said, I'm gonna use "shallow" in my routes instead.

```
shallow do
  resources :projects do 
    resources :collections
  end
end

```

The associated routes are :

```
   project_collections GET    /projects/:project_id/collections(.:format)     collections#index
                       POST   /projects/:project_id/collections(.:format)     collections#create
new_project_collection GET    /projects/:project_id/collections/new(.:format) collections#new
       edit_collection GET    /collections/:id/edit(.:format)                 collections#edit
            collection GET    /collections/:id(.:format)                      collections#show
                       PATCH  /collections/:id(.:format)                      collections#update
                       PUT    /collections/:id(.:format)                      collections#update
                       DELETE /collections/:id(.:format)                      collections#destroy
              projects GET    /projects(.:format)                             projects#index
                       POST   /projects(.:format)                             projects#create
           new_project GET    /projects/new(.:format)                         projects#new
          edit_project GET    /projects/:id/edit(.:format)                    projects#edit
               project GET    /projects/:id(.:format)                         projects#show
                       PATCH  /projects/:id(.:format)                         projects#update
                       PUT    /projects/:id(.:format)                         projects#update
                       DELETE /projects/:id(.:format)                         projects#destroy

```

The major difference I see is the "show" of collections, this specific one :

```
collection GET    /collections/:id(.:format)                      collections#show

```

So if I I'm correct, the link for the show action for a collection is :

```
<%= link_to 'Show", collection_path(collection)%>

```

and should return something like this : "http://example.com/collections/1"

BUT ! 2 things :

* This is not working. I'm getting instead "http://example.com/projects/1".
* Even if it was working, it's actually IMO pretty bad because I loose the REST basic that say "Collection is child of project, then the url should be "localhost/project/1/collections/1"

I don't understand what is the interest of shallow if I loose the big advantage of Rest actions. And what is the interest to loose the "Show" action as well ? I already posted this to SO, but the only comment i got is "It's something normal". I don't believe this is a normal behavior to "remove" an action from the rest API ?

Yes, it might be convenient for the helpers to use shallow, but it is NOT AT ALL convenient for the rest, you loose all the interest of "one collection is nested to one project, so this is reflected in the URL".

I don't know if there is another way to do this, it's true that shallow allow more flexibility about the helpers, but it's false that it is REST compliant. So, is there any chance to get the "helpers" working (it's pretty awesome to have "nested3\_path(collection)" instead of "nested1\_nested2\_nested3([nested1.nested2.nested3, nested1.nested2, nested1])", and keeping the "url part "nested1/123/nested2/456/nested3/789" ?