The misspelled word in the title is intentional.

Is the site's scope still aligned with what was in mind, say, 4-5 months ago?

I see more and more questions that are more pedagogy than CS. While the questions are related to both CS and Teaching (as they should), very few are about "technical" aspects of teaching some subject/paradigm/concept.

As an example, it seems to me that the first question that is more technical (when viewing questions sorted by "newest") is this one: [My teacher said that java is pass-by-reference when the type is not a primitive](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/questions/4461)

That's 2 months ago. There have been a number of more pedagogical questions since. 

It seems to me that the site is getting less questions related to teaching specific things such as [loops](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/questions/2632/teaching-the-humble-for-loop), [git](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/questions/2897/how-do-i-teach-git-to-a-teenager) and also our once-popular [analogies](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/questions/17/analogy-for-teaching-recursion) questions.

So, is it "Pedagogical aspects of teaching CS", or "Teaching(/Learning) CS: Both pedagogy and technical points"?

What are some others' thoughts on this matter?