Does the superposition principle actually tell us about our inability to predict what happens during the course of the experiment? Does it tell that, since an experiment has multiple outcomes ( i.e , in the case of the double slit experiment , the electron can either pass through slit 1 or 2), all the outcomes have would an equal probability of manifesting (assuming that is true), but since we do not know which one would manifest, the object in question would be in a "superposition of all the outcomes", while in reality there is only actually one of the multiple outcomes is actually happening? Is it like throwing and catching a perfectly balanced dice in the air and while the dice is in the air, telling that the dice is in a "superposition of all nos 1-6" ?