I've recently decided to start ~~rep farming~~ ~~trying to earn the archaeologist badge~~ cleaning up posts in Ask Ubuntu where I am a low-repper.

Because each of my suggested edits require multi-user approval and final approval *takes too long*, I can only submit one or two edits per day.

I am not a "problematic edit suggestor" (of my first 60+ suggested edits, only a couple have been rejected -- coincidentally my first two edits). I would like the rate limit algorithm to be recalibrated/improved so that users who are consistently making good/thorough/approved edits can be empowered to make more contributions.

Please make any conditional increase related to **edit suggestion outcomes** instead of **rep-based**. Even 10 or 15 would allow me to contribute more.

Related content:

* [Rate limit suggested edits](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/210416/352329)
* [Should the amount of possible edit suggestions per day be limited?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/194114/352329)
* [Limit the number of pending suggested edits](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/312942/2943403)
* [Can we increase the capacity of our Suggested Edits queue?](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/19602/955434)

Edit: I'm returning to this question again because I find myself, again, hamstrung waiting for edit approvals. I am working a Review Queue and cannot finish my review because I have maxed out my allowance of pending suggested reviews (5). I think I should have at least enough to edit my allowance of daily Review Queue items -- otherwise, I cannot review effectively. My stance remains: an increase in allowance would be better for the community that I am volunteering on.