Ever since cards like [Arcum's Astrolabe](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bArcum%27s%5d%2b%5bAstrolabe%5d) and [Ice-Fang Coatl](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?name=%2b%5bIce-Fang%20Coatl%5d) were printed, there've been payoffs for having snow covered lands instead of basics, with an entirely new archetype being spawned ([Snowko](https://www.mtggoldfish.com/archetype/4c-no-red-snowko/decks)).

Hence there are reasons to run snow-covered lands instead of "normal" basic lands. Are there any reasons to run the regular basic lands instead of snow-covered lands? If not, then one might as well use snow-covered lands since it can conceivably bluff the opponent into thinking they're playing against a different deck, at least for the first turn.