This morning, I and my fellow moderators are faced with a quandary. Once again, we have a pile of disputed low quality flags in our queue, the majority of which are for answers to single-word-requests.

Most low quality flags go through the community review tools. They come to the moderators to resolve when there is dispute about whether the flag is valid. 

They usually manifest as one or more of the following:

* as a suggestion/question

> 
> How about "fish"?
> 
> 
>
* filled in the blank of the example context question 

> 
> I would really like you to **examine** that thing.
> 
> 
>
* as a shotgun list that might be copypasta from a thesaurus

> 
> wedge; heel; flat; slide; mule; slipper; trainers; jellies; crocs;
> 
> 
>

And that's the entirety of the answer.

Here's the problem:

1. Most of the time these are technically answers.
2. Most of the time these don't meet our requirements - they are not linked to a dictionary definition and explained.
3. Most of the time we leave a note to that effect and either the answer is never updated or the poster gets angry and ends up suspended.

Personally, I'd like to post a reminder on Meta and then begin just deleting these answers outright. I would like to hear suggestions from the community first.