I do wish for objective answers; so how can the following be improved? Law does depend on opinion; so why were these deemed 'primarily opinion-based' or 'unclear'?

<https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/274/did-bias-or-racism-affect-the-majority-in-plessy-v-ferguson-1896>  

<https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/76/in-bush-v-gore-2001-us-was-the-majoritys-decision-biased>  

<https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/63/are-public-access-barristers-more-skilled-than-solicitors> 

**Unilateral closures:**

<https://law.stackexchange.com/q/688/89>  

<https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/66/what-are-some-uk-supreme-court-decisions-considered-as-wrongly-decided>  

<https://law.stackexchange.com/q/65/89>  

<https://law.stackexchange.com/q/67/89>