I've seen a few suggested edits that have changes basically amounting to *"… a SQL query …"* → *"… an SQL query …"*, and vice versa.

I will typically approve these if the rest of the edit is substantial enough to warrant it, and will reject it otherwise as not improving the post. Do we agree that's the way to go?

If so, I'd like to be able to point to this question when rejecting such suggested edits, in order to improve behaviour around the issues in the future, with the ultimate goal of reducing noise in the suggested edit queue. "No improvement whatsoever" doesn't really cut it for me, because those people who have very strong opinions may well just think "what a bunch of ignoramuses" and move on to the next one.

And yeah, I'm aware this is an extremely minor issue; does that really matter? It seems to me to be one more (small) way we can be a less hostile community—respect authors' right to use whichever pronunciation they're most comfortable with.