There is not a week that goes by that I do not see a question that was closed for "**This question needs details or clarity**" *and yet the question is perfectly clear to me.* My hypothesis is that this happens mainly because (perhaps overzealous) reviewers see a question they know little or nothing about, and assume that because they don't understand the topic that the question requires "details or clarity."

For now, I will give just one example:   [**This question**](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68317362) is tagged [matplotlib](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/matplotlib "show questions tagged 'matplotlib'") and [mplfinance](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/mplfinance "show questions tagged 'mplfinance'"). To anyone who has knowledge of those two packages, this question is perfectly clear.

Personally, when reviewing questions, I try to be very careful not to comment or vote on topics about which I do not have some significant expertise.

*It seems to me that only people with a strong knowledge of a topic are qualified to say whether or not a question really does require additional details or clarity.*

My question here is whether we can come up with a way to discourage those with little knowledge of a topic from voting to close questions on that topic?

* Perhaps there should be an easy way to start a discussion with those who voted to close. This could be a way to get clarity about which part of the question they don't understand.
* Alternatively, there should be an easy way (for both the questioner and other reviewers) to send a message to the closers, requesting that the question be re-opened to allow those with the required expertise to decide if the question *actually* requires details and clarity.