[This question](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/33721/2672) currently has two close votes for the following reason:

> 
> Questions about biblical topics but without a specific Bible passage are off-topic as hermeneutical methods cannot be applied when no text is referenced.
> 
> 
> 

However, I would argue it is [on-topic](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) as it is about "hermeneutical approaches". The close reason is, as I see it, meant for questions like these: [four words](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/33698/2672); [favourites of Christ](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/33662/2672); [involuntary singles](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/33656/2672). The question linked at the start of this post falls into a broader group of 'meta-questions' about hermeneutics, together with several of our highest-voted questions: [exegesis vs. hermeneutics](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/36/2672); [Jewish vs. Christian](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/50/2672); [Enoch](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/8888/2672); [LXX](https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/q/32/2672).

Can we reformulate the off-topic close reason to not generate this confusion?