elplaguister/DTS_pair_datasets · Datasets at Hugging Face

prev1 stringlengths 1 7.9k	prev2 stringlengths 1 7.9k ⌀	next1 stringlengths 1 7.9k	next2 stringlengths 1 7.9k ⌀	is_boundary bool 2 classes	session_id stringlengths 7 14
So.	we we we will not need the really uh expert designers um because the amount , yeah.	Mm.	Yeah.	false	QMSum_141
we we we will not need the really uh expert designers um because the amount , yeah.	Mm.	Yeah.	Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe	false	QMSum_141
Mm.	Yeah.	Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe	Okay.	false	QMSum_141
Yeah.	Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe	Okay.	and see if we can drive the prices down to add a few more things in but that's all we can do with the restrictions we have at the moment.	false	QMSum_141
Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe	Okay.	and see if we can drive the prices down to add a few more things in but that's all we can do with the restrictions we have at the moment.	null	false	QMSum_141
As usual.	null	Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?	It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.	false	QMSum_96
As usual.	Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?	It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.	Something 's not right here.	false	QMSum_96
Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?	It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.	Something 's not right here.	Internal alarms.	false	QMSum_96
It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.	Something 's not right here.	Internal alarms.	OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans	false	QMSum_96
Something 's not right here.	Internal alarms.	OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans	Yes.	false	QMSum_96
Internal alarms.	OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans	Yes.	in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.	false	QMSum_96
OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans	Yes.	in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.	Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?	false	QMSum_96
Yes.	in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.	Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?	OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,	false	QMSum_96
in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.	Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?	OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,	Mmm.	false	QMSum_96
Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?	OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,	Mmm.	and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.	false	QMSum_96
OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,	Mmm.	and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.	What a great time to be coming back to the	false	QMSum_96
Mmm.	and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.	What a great time to be coming back to the	God bless America.	false	QMSum_96
and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.	What a great time to be coming back to the	God bless America.	You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.	false	QMSum_96
What a great time to be coming back to the	God bless America.	You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.	And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.	false	QMSum_96
God bless America.	You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.	And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.	Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.	false	QMSum_96
You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.	And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.	Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.	Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?	false	QMSum_96
And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.	Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.	Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?	Mm - hmm. Alitalia.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.	Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?	Mm - hmm. Alitalia.	Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but	false	QMSum_96
Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?	Mm - hmm. Alitalia.	Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but	Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.	false	QMSum_96
Mm - hmm. Alitalia.	Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but	Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.	On ?	false	QMSum_96
Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but	Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.	On ?	With us.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.	On ?	With us.	Oh.	false	QMSum_96
On ?	With us.	Oh.	And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.	false	QMSum_96
With us.	Oh.	And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.	OK.	false	QMSum_96
Oh.	And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.	OK.	So this is so weird it should even make you happy.	false	QMSum_96
And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.	OK.	So this is so weird it should even make you happy.	Uh. OK.	false	QMSum_96
OK.	So this is so weird it should even make you happy.	Uh. OK.	Oh great.	false	QMSum_96
So this is so weird it should even make you happy.	Uh. OK.	Oh great.	Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.	false	QMSum_96
Uh. OK.	Oh great.	Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.	Mm - hmm.	false	QMSum_96
Oh great.	Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.	Mm - hmm.	It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "	false	QMSum_96
Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.	Mm - hmm.	It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "	Mm - hmm.	false	QMSum_96
Mm - hmm.	It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "	Mm - hmm.	in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.	false	QMSum_96
It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "	Mm - hmm.	in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.	Hmm.	false	QMSum_96
Mm - hmm.	in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.	Hmm.	Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?	false	QMSum_96
in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.	Hmm.	Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?	Absolutely.	false	QMSum_96
Hmm.	Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?	Absolutely.	OK.	false	QMSum_96
Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?	Absolutely.	OK.	And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.	false	QMSum_96
Absolutely.	OK.	And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.	Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.	false	QMSum_96
OK.	And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.	Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.	Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,	false	QMSum_96
And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.	Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.	Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,	That 's good.	false	QMSum_96
Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.	Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,	That 's good.	you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,	That 's good.	you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.	Mm - hmm. Right , right.	false	QMSum_96
That 's good.	you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.	Mm - hmm. Right , right.	But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.	false	QMSum_96
you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.	Mm - hmm. Right , right.	But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.	Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.	false	QMSum_96
Mm - hmm. Right , right.	But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.	Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.	So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.	false	QMSum_96
But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.	Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.	So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.	Well , once the system understands things.	false	QMSum_96
Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.	So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.	Well , once the system understands things.	Yeah. No problem.	false	QMSum_96
So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.	Well , once the system understands things.	Yeah. No problem.	I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.	false	QMSum_96
Well , once the system understands things.	Yeah. No problem.	I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.	Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah. No problem.	I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.	Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.	Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean	false	QMSum_96
I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.	Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.	Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean	just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?	false	QMSum_96
Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.	Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean	just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?	It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?	false	QMSum_96
Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean	just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?	It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?	Yeah.	false	QMSum_96
just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?	It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?	Yeah.	But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.	false	QMSum_96
It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?	Yeah.	But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.	Nnn , yeah.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah.	But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.	Nnn , yeah.	It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But	false	QMSum_96
But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.	Nnn , yeah.	It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But	The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.	false	QMSum_96
Nnn , yeah.	It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But	The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.	Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this	false	QMSum_96
It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But	The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.	Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this	Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.	false	QMSum_96
The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.	Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this	Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.	No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?	false	QMSum_96
Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this	Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.	No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?	What would it ask ?	false	QMSum_96
Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.	No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?	What would it ask ?	It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.	false	QMSum_96
No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?	What would it ask ?	It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.	It shur	false	QMSum_96
What would it ask ?	It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.	It shur	Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.	false	QMSum_96
It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.	It shur	Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.	Yeah !	false	QMSum_96
It shur	Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.	Yeah !	Mm - hmm.	false	QMSum_96
Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.	Yeah !	Mm - hmm.	Yeah.	false	QMSum_96
Yeah !	Mm - hmm.	Yeah.	Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".	false	QMSum_96
Mm - hmm.	Yeah.	Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".	Eh , n	false	QMSum_96
Yeah.	Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".	Eh , n	Yeah.	false	QMSum_96
Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".	Eh , n	Yeah.	Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,	false	QMSum_96
Eh , n	Yeah.	Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,	Well , no I guess not. Excel	false	QMSum_96
Yeah.	Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,	Well , no I guess not. Excel	s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.	false	QMSum_96
Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,	Well , no I guess not. Excel	s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.	Sure.	false	QMSum_96
Well , no I guess not. Excel	s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.	Sure.	Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that	false	QMSum_96
s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.	Sure.	Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that	Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?	false	QMSum_96
Sure.	Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that	Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?	Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.	false	QMSum_96
Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that	Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?	Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.	And , have it talk about OK.	false	QMSum_96
Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?	Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.	And , have it talk about OK.	You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?	false	QMSum_96
Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.	And , have it talk about OK.	You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?	Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.	false	QMSum_96
And , have it talk about OK.	You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?	Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.	And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,	false	QMSum_96
You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?	Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.	And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,	I 'm just	false	QMSum_96
Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.	And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,	I 'm just	or " what is that whatever ".	false	QMSum_96
And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,	I 'm just	or " what is that whatever ".	I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.	false	QMSum_96
I 'm just	or " what is that whatever ".	I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.	No	false	QMSum_96
or " what is that whatever ".	I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.	No	Mmm.	false	QMSum_96
I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.	No	Mmm.	Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?	false	QMSum_96
No	Mmm.	Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?	Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,	false	QMSum_96
Mmm.	Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?	Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,	It 's a	false	QMSum_96
Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?	Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,	It 's a	Uh ,	false	QMSum_96
Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,	It 's a	Uh ,	cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty	false	QMSum_96
It 's a	Uh ,	cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty	And like thirty input nodes	false	QMSum_96
Uh ,	cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty	And like thirty input nodes	thirty input nodes.	false	QMSum_96
cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty	And like thirty input nodes	thirty input nodes.	or some	false	QMSum_96
And like thirty input nodes	thirty input nodes.	or some	So to test every output node , uh , would at least Let 's see , so it would be two to the thirty for every output node ? Which is very th very large.	false	QMSum_96

So.

we we we will not need the really uh expert designers um because the amount , yeah.

Mm.

Yeah.

false

QMSum_141

we we we will not need the really uh expert designers um because the amount , yeah.

Mm.

Yeah.

Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe

false

QMSum_141

Mm.

Yeah.

Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe

Okay.

false

QMSum_141

Yeah.

Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe

Okay.

and see if we can drive the prices down to add a few more things in but that's all we can do with the restrictions we have at the moment.

false

QMSum_141

Yep. So w we can go back and l talk to the suppliers maybe

Okay.

and see if we can drive the prices down to add a few more things in but that's all we can do with the restrictions we have at the moment.

null

false

QMSum_141

As usual.

null

Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?

It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.

false

QMSum_96

As usual.

Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?

It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.

Something 's not right here.

false

QMSum_96

Yes. Whew ! I almost forgot about the meeting. I woke up twenty minutes ago , thinking , what did I forget ?

It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.

Something 's not right here.

Internal alarms.

false

QMSum_96

It 's great how the br brain sort of does that.

Something 's not right here.

Internal alarms.

OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans

false

QMSum_96

Something 's not right here.

Internal alarms.

OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans

Yes.

false

QMSum_96

Internal alarms.

OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans

Yes.

in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.

false

QMSum_96

OK. So the news for me is A , my forthcoming travel plans

Yes.

in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.

Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?

false

QMSum_96

Yes.

in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.

Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?

OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,

false

QMSum_96

in two weeks from today ? Yeah ? More or less ? I 'll be off to Sicily and Germany for a couple , three days.

Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?

OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,

Mmm.

false

QMSum_96

Now what are y what are you doing there ? I forgot ?

OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,

Mmm.

and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.

false

QMSum_96

OK , I 'm flying to Sicily basically to drop off Simon there with his grandparents. And then I 'm flying to Germany t to go to a MOKU - Treffen which is the meeting of all the module - responsible people in SmartKom ,

Mmm.

and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.

What a great time to be coming back to the

false

QMSum_96

Mmm.

and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.

What a great time to be coming back to the

God bless America.

false

QMSum_96

and , represent ICI and myself I guess there. And um. That 's the mmm actual reason. And then I 'm also going up to EML for a day , and then I 'm going to meet the very big boss , Wolfgang Walster , in Saarbruecken and the System system integration people in Kaiserslautern and then I 'm flying back via Sicily pick up my son come back here on the fourth of July. And uh.

What a great time to be coming back to the

God bless America.

You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.

false

QMSum_96

What a great time to be coming back to the

God bless America.

You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.

And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.

false

QMSum_96

God bless America.

You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.

And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.

Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.

false

QMSum_96

You 'll see maybe see the fireworks from your plane coming in.

And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.

Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.

Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?

false

QMSum_96

And I 'm sure all the the people at the airport will be happy to work on that day.

Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.

Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?

Mm - hmm. Alitalia.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah. You 'll get even better service than usual.

Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?

Mm - hmm. Alitalia.

Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but

false

QMSum_96

Wait , aren't you flying on Lufthansa though ?

Mm - hmm. Alitalia.

Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but

Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.

false

QMSum_96

Mm - hmm. Alitalia.

Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but

Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.

On ?

false

QMSum_96

Oh. Well then the you know , it 's not a big deal. Once you get to the United States it 'll be a problem , but

Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.

On ?

With us.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah. And um , that 's that bit of news , and the other bit of news is we had you know , uh , I was visited by my German project manager who A , did like what we did what we 're doing here , and B , is planning to come here either three weeks in July or three weeks in August , to actually work.

On ?

With us.

Oh.

false

QMSum_96

On ?

With us.

Oh.

And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.

false

QMSum_96

With us.

Oh.

And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.

OK.

false

QMSum_96

Oh.

And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.

OK.

So this is so weird it should even make you happy.

false

QMSum_96

And we sat around and we talked and he came up we came up with a pretty strange idea. And that 's what I 'm gonna lay on you now. And um , maybe it might be ultimately the most interesting thing for Eva because she has been known to complain about the fact that the stuff we do here is not weird enough.

OK.

So this is so weird it should even make you happy.

Uh. OK.

false

QMSum_96

OK.

So this is so weird it should even make you happy.

Uh. OK.

Oh great.

false

QMSum_96

So this is so weird it should even make you happy.

Uh. OK.

Oh great.

Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.

false

QMSum_96

Uh. OK.

Oh great.

Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.

Mm - hmm.

false

QMSum_96

Oh great.

Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.

Mm - hmm.

It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "

false

QMSum_96

Imagine if you will , that we have a system that does all that understanding that we want it to do based on utterances.

Mm - hmm.

It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "

Mm - hmm.

false

QMSum_96

Mm - hmm.

It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "

Mm - hmm.

in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.

false

QMSum_96

It should be possible to make that system produce questions. So if you have the knowledge of how to interpret " where is X ? " under given conditions , situational , user , discourse and ontological conditions , you should also be able to make that same system ask " where is X ? "

Mm - hmm.

in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.

Hmm.

false

QMSum_96

Mm - hmm.

in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.

Hmm.

Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?

false

QMSum_96

in a sper certain way , based on certain intentions. So in instead of just being able to observe phenomenon , um , and , guess the intention we might be able just to sort of give it an intention , and make it produce an utterance.

Hmm.

Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?

Absolutely.

false

QMSum_96

Hmm.

Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?

Absolutely.

OK.

false

QMSum_96

Well , like in AI they generally do the take in , and then they also do the generation phase , like Nancy 's thing. Or uh , you remember , in the the hand thing in one - eighty - two , like not only was it able to recognize but it was also to generate based upon situations. You mean that sort of thing ?

Absolutely.

OK.

And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.

false

QMSum_96

Absolutely.

OK.

And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.

Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.

false

QMSum_96

OK.

And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.

Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.

Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,

false

QMSum_96

And once you 've done that what we can do is have the system ask itself. And answer , understand the answer , ask something else , and enter a dialogue with itself. So the the ba basic the same idea as having two chess computers play against each other.

Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.

Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,

That 's good.

false

QMSum_96

Except this smacks a little bit more of a schizophrenic computer than AI.

Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,

That 's good.

you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah you c if you want , you can have two parallel machines um , asking each other. What would that give us ? Would A be something completely weird and strange , and B , i if you look at all the factors , we will never observe people let 's say , in wheelchairs under you know , in under all conditions ,

That 's good.

you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.

Mm - hmm. Right , right.

false

QMSum_96

That 's good.

you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.

Mm - hmm. Right , right.

But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.

false

QMSum_96

you know , when they say " X " , and there is a ride at the goal , and the parking is good , we can never collect enough data. It 's it 's it 's not possible.

Mm - hmm. Right , right.

But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.

Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.

false

QMSum_96

Mm - hmm. Right , right.

But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.

Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.

So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.

false

QMSum_96

But maybe one could do some learning. If you get the system to speak to itself , you may find n break downs and errors and you may be able to learn. And make it more robust , maybe learn new things. And um , so there 's no no end of potential things one could get out of it , if that works. And he would like to actually work on that with us.

Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.

So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.

Well , once the system understands things.

false

QMSum_96

Well then , he probably should be coming back a year from now.

So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.

Well , once the system understands things.

Yeah. No problem.

false

QMSum_96

So Yeah , I w See the the generation bit , making the system generate generate something , is shouldn't be too hard.

Well , once the system understands things.

Yeah. No problem.

I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.

false

QMSum_96

Well , once the system understands things.

Yeah. No problem.

I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.

Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah. No problem.

I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.

Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.

Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean

false

QMSum_96

I just don't think I think we 're probably a year away from getting the system to understand things.

Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.

Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean

just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?

false

QMSum_96

Yeah. Well , if we can get it to understand one thing , like our " where is " run through we can also , maybe , e make it say , or ask " where is X ? " Or not.

Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean

just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?

It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?

false

QMSum_96

Mmm , I don't know. e I 'm sort of have the impression that getting it to say the right thing in the right circumstances is much more difficult than getting it to understand something given the circumstances and so on , you know , I mean just cuz it 's sort of harder to learn to speak correctly in a foreign language , rather than learning to understand it. Right ? I mean

just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?

It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?

Yeah.

false

QMSum_96

just the fact that we 'll get The point is that getting it to understand one construction doesn't mean that it will n always know exactly when it 's correct to use that construction. Right ?

It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?

Yeah.

But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.

false

QMSum_96

It 's it 's uh Well , I 've I 've done generation and language production research for fo four four and a half years. And so it 's it 's you 're right , it 's not the same as the understanding. It 's in some ways easier and some ways harder. nuh ?

Yeah.

But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.

Nnn , yeah.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah.

But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.

Nnn , yeah.

It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But

false

QMSum_96

But , um , I think it 'd be fun to look at it , or into that question.

Nnn , yeah.

It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But

The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.

false

QMSum_96

Nnn , yeah.

It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But

The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.

Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this

false

QMSum_96

It 's a pretty strange idea. And so that 's that 's But

The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.

Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this

Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.

false

QMSum_96

The basic idea I guess would be to give allow the system to have intentions , basically ? Cuz that 's basically what needs to be added to the system for it.

Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this

Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.

No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?

false

QMSum_96

Well , look at th eee , I think even think even What it would be the the prior intention. So let 's uh uh , let 's say we have this

Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.

No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?

What would it ask ?

false

QMSum_96

Well we 'd have to seed that , I mean.

No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?

What would it ask ?

It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.

false

QMSum_96

No. Let 's we have to we have some some top - down processing , given certain setting. OK , now we change nothing , and just say ask something. Right ?

What would it ask ?

It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.

It shur

false

QMSum_96

What would it ask ?

It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.

It shur

Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.

false

QMSum_96

It wouldn't know what to ask. I mean.

It shur

Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.

Yeah !

false

QMSum_96

It shur

Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.

Yeah !

Mm - hmm.

false

QMSum_96

Unless it was in a situation. We 'd have to set up a situation where , it didn't know where something was and it wanted to go there.

Yeah !

Mm - hmm.

Yeah.

false

QMSum_96

Yeah !

Mm - hmm.

Yeah.

Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".

false

QMSum_96

Mm - hmm.

Yeah.

Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".

Eh , n

false

QMSum_96

Yeah.

Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".

Eh , n

Yeah.

false

QMSum_96

Which means that we 'd need to set up an intention inside of the system. Right ? Which is basically , " I don't know where something is and I need to go there ".

Eh , n

Yeah.

Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,

false

QMSum_96

Eh , n

Yeah.

Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,

Well , no I guess not. Excel

false

QMSum_96

Yeah.

Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,

Well , no I guess not. Excel

s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.

false

QMSum_96

Ooh , do we really need to do that ? Because ,

Well , no I guess not. Excel

s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.

Sure.

false

QMSum_96

Well , no I guess not. Excel

s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.

Sure.

Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that

false

QMSum_96

s It 's i I know it 's it 's strange , but look at it look at our Bayes - net. If we don't have Let 's assume we don't have any input from the language. Right ? So there 's also nothing we could query the ontology , but we have a certain user setting. If you just ask , what is the likelihood of that person wanting to enter some something , it 'll give you an answer.

Sure.

Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that

Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?

false

QMSum_96

Sure.

Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that

Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?

Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.

false

QMSum_96

Right ? That 's just how they are. And so , @ @ whatever that is , it 's the generic default intention. That it would find out. Which is , wanting to know where something is , maybe nnn and wanting I don't know what it 's gonna be , but there 's gonna be something that

Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?

Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.

And , have it talk about OK.

false

QMSum_96

Well you 're not gonna are you gonna get a variety of intentions out of that then ? I mean , you 're just talking about like given this user , what 's the th what is it what is that user most likely to want to do ?

Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.

And , have it talk about OK.

You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?

false

QMSum_96

Well you can observe some user and context stuff and ask , what 's the posterior probabilities of all of our decision nodes.

And , have it talk about OK.

You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?

Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.

false

QMSum_96

And , have it talk about OK.

You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?

Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.

And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,

false

QMSum_96

You could even say , " let 's take all the priors , let 's observe nothing " , and query all the posterior probabilities. It - it 's gonna tell us something. Right ?

Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.

And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,

I 'm just

false

QMSum_96

Well , it will d r assign values to all the nodes. Yes.

And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,

I 'm just

or " what is that whatever ".

false

QMSum_96

And Yes. And come up with posterior probabilities for all the values of the decision nodes. Which , if we have an algorithm that filters out whatever the the best or the most consistent answer out of that , will give us the intention ex nihilo. And that is exactly what would happen if we ask it to produce an utterance , it would be b based on that extension , ex nihilo , which we don't know what it is , but it 's there. So we wouldn't even have to t to kick start it by giving it a certain intention or observing anything on the decision node. And whatever that maybe that would lead to " what is the castle ? " ,

I 'm just

or " what is that whatever ".

I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.

false

QMSum_96

I 'm just

or " what is that whatever ".

I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.

No

false

QMSum_96

or " what is that whatever ".

I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.

No

Mmm.

false

QMSum_96

I guess what I 'm afraid of is if we don't , you know , set up a situation , we 'll just get a bunch of garbage out , like you know , everything 's exactly thirty percent.

No

Mmm.

Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?

false

QMSum_96

No

Mmm.

Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?

Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,

false

QMSum_96

Mmm.

Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?

Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,

It 's a

false

QMSum_96

Yeah. So what we actually then need to do is is write a little script that changes all the settings , you know , go goes through all the permutations , which is we did a didn't we calculate that once ?

Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,

It 's a

Uh ,

false

QMSum_96

Well that was that was absurdly low , in the last meeting ,

It 's a

Uh ,

cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty

false

QMSum_96

It 's a

Uh ,

cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty

And like thirty input nodes

false

QMSum_96

Uh ,

cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty

And like thirty input nodes

thirty input nodes.

false

QMSum_96

cuz I went and looked at it cuz I was thinking , that could not be right , and it would it was on the order of twenty output nodes and something like twenty

And like thirty input nodes

thirty input nodes.

or some

false

QMSum_96

And like thirty input nodes

thirty input nodes.

or some

So to test every output node , uh , would at least Let 's see , so it would be two to the thirty for every output node ? Which is very th very large.

false

QMSum_96