<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement, since if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement, because if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is not suspected of involvement, as if a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a local gang, known as the 'crimson snakes,' is suspected of involvement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A local gang, known as the 'Crimson Snakes,' is not suspected of involvement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The store's security footage was mysteriously deleted
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted, since if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted, because if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted, as if the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security footage was mysteriously deleted then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The store's security footage was not mysteriously deleted
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, since if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, because if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned, as if a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless shelter reported an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A homeless shelter did not report an increase in stolen jewelry being pawned
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain, since if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain, because if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain, as if the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon was a silver revolver found in a storm drain then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon was not a silver revolver found in a storm drain
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah had recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah had not recently taken out a hefty life insurance policy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.