<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, since if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, because if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, as if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, since if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, because if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, as if a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A security camera did not capture a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's name is sarah mitchell, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's name is sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's name is sarah mitchell
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's name is not sarah mitchell.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's name is not sarah mitchell, since if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's name is not sarah mitchell, because if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's name is not sarah mitchell, as if the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's name is sarah mitchell then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's name is not Sarah Mitchell
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, since if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, because if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing, as if forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If forensic analysis revealed gunshot residue on the victim's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Forensic analysis did not reveal gunshot residue on the victim's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen jewels were worth over a million dollars then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen jewels were not worth over a million dollars
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.