<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store, since if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store, because if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store, as if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask approaching the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask approaching the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft, since if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft, because if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft, as if emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's ex-boyfriend, daniel, has a criminal record for theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's ex-boyfriend, Daniel, does not have a criminal record for theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment, since if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment, because if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A missing security camera was not found hidden in emily's apartment, as if a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a missing security camera was found hidden in emily's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A missing security camera was not found hidden in Emily's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, since if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, because if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man, as if a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless woman named rosa claims to have seen sarah with an unfamiliar man then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No homeless woman named Rosa claims to have seen Sarah with an unfamiliar man
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery, since if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery, because if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson's business partner, james, did not have a motive for the robbery, as if richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson's business partner, james, had a motive for the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson's business partner, James, did not have a motive for the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was discovered in a dumpster nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.