<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, since if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, because if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, as if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, since if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, because if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, as if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, since if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, because if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, as if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, since if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, because if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, as if laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, since if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, because if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, as if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.