<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the sun is setting, so it can be concluded that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the sun is setting, so officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the sun is setting, which implies that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the sun is setting, which shows that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the sun is setting, which establishes that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, since if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, because if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, as if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the sun is setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The sun is setting
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, hence the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, thus the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which implies that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which shows that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which establishes that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, since if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, because if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, as if the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, therefore officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, hence officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, thus officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, so it can be concluded that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, so officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, which implies that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, which shows that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the baby is sleeping, which establishes that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, since if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, because if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, as if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, hence the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, thus the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which implies that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which shows that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which establishes that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, since if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, because if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, as if the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, therefore officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, hence officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, thus officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, so it can be concluded that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, so officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, which implies that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, which shows that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the car is moving, which establishes that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, since if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, because if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, as if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, hence the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, thus the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which implies that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which shows that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which establishes that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, since if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, because if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, as if the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, therefore officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, hence officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, thus officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, so it can be concluded that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, so officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, which implies that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, which shows that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the bird is singing, which establishes that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, since if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, because if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, as if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, hence the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, thus the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which implies that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which shows that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, which establishes that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, since if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, because if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, as if the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, therefore officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, hence officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, thus officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, so it can be concluded that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, so officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, which implies that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, which shows that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and the water is warm, which establishes that officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, since if the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, because if the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, as if the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: Officer Smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, hence the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, thus the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, and officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Premise 2: Officer smith did not find a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.