id: 1205
title: A balancing act
summary:
content: |
  Wikipedia articles are summaries of pre-existing resources. They should be
  balanced according to the available literature. No aspect should take over too
  much of the article, and more well-documented viewpoints should get more
  space. However, a good article also presents minority viewpoints and
  positions.

  * Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject?
  Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything
  off-topic?
  * Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published
  literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing?

id: 1205
title: A balancing act
summary:
content: |
  <figure class="alt-layout-40-right">
    <img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Apothecary%27s_balance_with_steel_beam_and_brass_pans_in_woode_Wellcome_L0058880.jpg/640px-Apothecary%27s_balance_with_steel_beam_and_brass_pans_in_woode_Wellcome_L0058880.jpg" />
    <figcaption class="image-credit">
      <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apothecary%27s_balance_with_steel_beam_and_brass_pans_in_woode_Wellcome_L0058880.jpg">Photo from Wellcome Images</a>,
      CC-BY-SA
    </figcaption>
  </figure>

  Wikipedia articles are summaries of pre-existing resources. They should be
  balanced according to the available literature. No aspect should take over too
  much of the article, and more well-documented viewpoints should get more
  space. However, a good article also presents minority viewpoints and
  positions.

  * Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject?
  Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything
  off-topic?
  * Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published
  literature? Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing?

Add image to peer review 'balancing act' slide
Add image to peer review 'balancing act' slide
