# PL2 - Pantzerfaust
-------

## Rubrics

|                                     | Sprint 4   |           |                |                       |                |            |
|-------------------------------------|------------|-----------|----------------|-----------------------|----------------|------------|
|                                     | User Story |           |                | Learning From History |                |            |
| Group                               | Definition | Splitting | Responsibility | Estimation            | Prioritisation | Reflection |
| PL2 (Pantzerfaust)                  | 10         | 5         | 10             | 6                     | 9              | 7          |

|                                     | Code Evolution Quality 4 |         |                     |                  |         |          |                        |         |         |                        |             |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------|---------------------|------------------|---------|----------|------------------------|---------|---------|------------------------|-------------|
|                                     | Architecture             |         |                     | Code Readability |         |          | Continuous Integration |         |         | Pull-based Development |             |
| Group                               | Changes                  | Arch-DD | Code Change Quality | Change           | Quality | Comments | Building               | Testing | Tooling | Branching              | Code Review |
| PL2 (Pantzerfaust)                  | 8                        | 6       | 10                  | 10               | 10      | 9        | 9                      | 9       | 6       | 10                     | 10          |

## Notes
sprint:
-Splitting: Should be way more hours

reflection: 
-Prioritization: Lots of 3s for tasks where I think should be higher
-'Let people do the tasks which their tasks depend onthemselves.' really a good solution?
-Reflection: good analysis but present a better solution (why won't this happen again in the future?)

EAD:
-No new version
-Should implement previous feedback
-Changes still mapped to an outdated EAD

Readability:
-Spotted some outdated comments

Tooling:
-PMD, CPD errors
Testing:
-Nice coverage, should be able to build myself
Add feedback for sprint 4
Add feedback for sprint 4
