Unnamed: 0
int64 0
2.68k
| input
stringlengths 14
771
| output
stringclasses 10
values | instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|
1,700 | Better a thousand septuagenarian Wuerls in their lavish sties of corruption financed by the faithful than a single young neotraditionalist prelate | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,701 | septuagenarian Wuerls in their lavish sties of corruption | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,702 | single young neotraditionalist prelate | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,703 | an orthodox Catholic who has had enough of the homosexualinfested regime of novelty imposed on the Church by the old men of the Council | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,704 | As Faggioli puts it In the last fifteen years the American Catholic Church has been traversed by a radicalization of religious conservatism in the neotraditionalism sense especially in the younger generations of priests and intellectualsThey interpret the current abuse crisis as fruit of the mistakes of the Council itself and not only of the postCouncil | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,705 | opened the way to ecclesial disaster | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,706 | demolition of the sacred liturgy | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,707 | in the depths of his conciliar delirium | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,708 | wave of affection and admiration flowed from the council over the modern world of humanity | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,709 | its aspirations purified and blessed | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,710 | Thus did Paul describe the conciliar opening to the world through which the world promptly invaded the Church including large numbers of homosexuals who should never have been admitted to the seminary | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,711 | a young clergy marked by personal sanctity but also by a fascination for a mythical Middle Ages | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,712 | young clergy marked by personal sanctity | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,713 | Any abandonment of the regime must be viewed as ecclesiastical treasonCatholic Jacobinismif not criminal activity | black and white fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,714 | a massive infestation by homosexual priests and prelates | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,715 | the final beachhead of the neoCatholic defense of their disintegrating regime | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,716 | what he is really arguingthe final beachhead of the neoCatholic defense of their disintegrating regimeis that homosexuals in the hierarchy must remain in authority as an indispensable seawall against a neotraditionalist storm surge | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,717 | a catastrophic failure in ecclesial innovation that has corrupted the human element of the Church in practically every department | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,718 | mount under this reckless Pope to an unsustainable indeed apocalyptic level | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,719 | of what is ever ancient but ever new | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,720 | candidates known to be active homosexuals | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,721 | stripped of its prophetic and admonitory content regarding the epochal malfeasance and corruption of the upper hierarchy | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,722 | the sufferings of the Church | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,723 | a really terrifying way | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,724 | a deep need to relearn penance to accept purification to learn forgiveness | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,725 | I believe that Archbishop Viganòs precious testimony is a sign that Heaven itself is now responding to the need for justice in the Church | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,726 | in the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,727 | a young clergy marked by personal sanctity but also by a fascination for a mythical Middle Ages | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,728 | an unsalvageable mass of corruption | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,729 | a Churchworld relationship based on a principle of reality | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,730 | Today neoCatholic commentators cowed by the demands of political correctness refuse to state the simple truth that homosexuality is a perversion that precludes ordination as does any other grave psychological disorder | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,731 | more than a little obsessed with homosexuality | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,732 | Take it seriously but with a large grain of salt | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,733 | Does Pope Francis have an enemies list | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,734 | the same Pope who sacks conservative bishops and cardinals according to his pleasure and has just removed a cardinal from the College of Cardinals in an unprecedented disciplinary act under fire from the media is somehow powerless to dismiss Modernist bishops who have created an obscene gay culture in the Church and replace them with orthodox normal heterosexual males | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,735 | Francis cannot simply fire even Cardinal Wuerl who covered up crimes of homosexual predation by the priests he transferred elsewhere while Archbishop of Pittsburgh and who authorized payment of 900000 in hush money to bury sexual abuse claims against a homosexual priest involved in the production of child pornography | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,736 | Homosexuality in the clergy exists and is a matter that must be addressed | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,737 | And how does the Church address a massive infestation by homosexual priests and prelates without removing them from authority and ensuring that they cannot promote homosexual successors for generation after generation | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,738 | You are the Popes representative in the US and you are urging me to read a book that questions what the secretary of state wrote | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,739 | disgraced antiTrump FBI agent | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,740 | touts Googles multifaceted efforts | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,741 | She brags that the company used its power | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,742 | also brags that Google used its power | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,743 | NOTHING is being done | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,744 | the world is watching and they get it completely | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,745 | a couple hundred thousand dollars of ad spends and some Russian bots on Facebook swayed the election to Donald Trump | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,746 | that is a sham | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,747 | Google has yet to answer why their search results for the word Idiot are vastly different from DuckDuckGo | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,748 | blew the cover off the 2016 election influence charade | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,749 | Mario touts Googles multifaceted efforts | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,750 | Hispanics ALL Hispanics are in President Trumps crosshairs | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,751 | according to a Breitbart report by Allum Bokhari | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,752 | Maybe thats why they refused to appear before Congress last week | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,753 | When will something be done about these tech and social media companies | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,754 | critical miscalculation Murillo wrote in a stunning admission | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,755 | rapists and drug dealers | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,756 | Make America Great Again | Slongs fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,757 | In the next paragraph Murillo again openly admits she was not objective when it came to the election | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,758 | some rogue staffer inside Google | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,759 | huge swaths of voters | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,760 | grieving Hillary Clinton supporters | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,761 | to control and shutter conservative ideas | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,762 | a getoutthevote for Hispanic voters operation | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,763 | only to undercut her own commentary in later passages in the emails by openly admitting the entire effort to boost Latino turnout using Google products with official company resources was to elect Clinton over Trump | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,764 | voted in recordbreaking numbers | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,765 | Carlson cited Dr Robert Epstein a social scientist and an expert on Google who has said in Carlsons words Google alone could determine the outcome of almost any election just by altering its search selections and we would never know it | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,766 | Google alone could determine the outcome of almost any election | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,767 | But of course they were both | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,768 | tried to rein it in | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,769 | the Latino Community Foundations nonpartisan YoVoyaVotaryTu Im going to vote are youcampaign | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,770 | our social media influencer friends | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,771 | the openly partisan intent of Googles actions | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,772 | this was finally the year that the sleeping giant had awoken | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,773 | Latino Voters Show Trump What It Means to Be American | flag waving fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,774 | to give grieving Hillary Clinton supporters hugs | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,775 | she and another person cried after Trump won | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,776 | how much they hurt how much they need support right now and that they are coordinating in different offices to meet up to just hold each other | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,777 | Ive never cried after an election until last night | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,778 | this election result hurt her badly | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,779 | it hurts more than I could have ever imagined | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,780 | They are probably hurting right now | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,781 | Google is throwing its weight around | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,782 | the duly elected President of the United States | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,783 | made a giant difference | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,784 | to Googlers and beyond | Slongs fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,785 | scratching the surface of bias | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,786 | Trump crushed her on election day | exaggeration/minimisation fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,787 | another indication that Googles efforts were clearly attempting to use company resources to elect Democrat Clinton over Republican Trump and influence the results of the election | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,788 | Hes a precedence man | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,789 | for the American people to see | flag waving fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,790 | the corrupt DOJ and FBI | name calling/labeling fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,791 | if they did then someone might actually have to act on something that actually was a crime | appeal to fear fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,792 | why dont they bring up his involvement in the Vince Foster coverup | Doubt fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,793 | I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,794 | This is nothing more than a lastminute attempt at character assassination and there should no delay in confirming Judge Kavanaugh | appeal to authority fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,795 | have sunk to their lowest level | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,796 | categorically and unequivocally deny | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,797 | cesspool of public gossip | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,798 | this is all a ruse to block Judge Kavanaughs confirmation by all means necessary | causal oversimplification fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
1,799 | slink back into their shadowy corner | loaded language fallacy | You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles.
Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
An argument has 2 parts:
Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that "this is right because so-and-so said that". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue
- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises.
- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience.
- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., "the best of the best", "quality guaranteed") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke).
- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea
- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something.
- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals.
What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.