id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA3700 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with over five years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2015 , 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 125 mmboe from december 31 , 2014 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2015 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|728|
|revisions of previous estimates|-223 ( 223 )|
|improved recovery|1|
|purchases of reserves in place|1|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|175|
|dispositions|2014|
|transfers to proved developed|-79 ( 79 )|
|end of year|603|
the revisions to previous estimates were largely due to a result of reductions to our capital development program which deferred proved undeveloped reserves beyond the 5-year plan . a total of 139 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions and revisions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the observed statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved developed locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 47 mmboe in the eagle ford , 14 mmboe in the bakken and 5 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1415 million , $ 3149 million and $ 2536 million . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 603 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2015 , 26% ( 26 % ) of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , fabrication of the new platform began in 2013 and installation of the platform at the alba field occurred in january 2016 . commissioning is currently underway , with first production expected by mid-2016 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development is being executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region leads to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil and political unrest have also extended the project duration . operations were interrupted in mid-2013 as a result of the shutdown of the es sider crude oil terminal , and although temporarily re-opened during the second half of 2014 , production remains shut-in through early 2016 . the operator is committed to the project 2019s completion and continues to assign resources in order to execute the project . our conversion rate for proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves for 2015 was 11% ( 11 % ) . however , excluding the aforementioned long-term projects in e.g . and libya , our 2015 conversion rate would be 15% ( 15 % ) . furthermore , our .
Question: what were total transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in mmboe in the eagle ford and in the bakken ?
Answer: | 61.0 |
FINQA3701 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties at december 31 , 2017 , we owned or leased building space ( including offices , manufacturing plants , warehouses , service centers , laboratories and other facilities ) at approximately 375 locations primarily in the u.s . additionally , we manage or occupy approximately 15 government-owned facilities under lease and other arrangements . at december 31 , 2017 , we had significant operations in the following locations : 2022 aeronautics - palmdale , california ; marietta , georgia ; greenville , south carolina ; and fort worth , texas . 2022 missiles and fire control - camdenarkansas ; ocala and orlando , florida ; lexington , kentucky ; and grand prairie , texas . 2022 rotary andmission systems - colorado springs , colorado ; shelton and stratford , connecticut ; orlando and jupiter , florida ; moorestown/mt . laurel , new jersey ; owego and syracuse , new york ; manassas , virginia ; and mielec , poland . 2022 space - sunnyvale , california ; denver , colorado ; valley forge , pennsylvania ; and reading , england . 2022 corporate activities - bethesda , maryland . the following is a summary of our square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : owned leased government- owned total .
||owned|leased|government-owned|total|
|aeronautics|5.0|2.1|14.4|21.5|
|missiles and fire control|6.3|2.8|1.8|10.9|
|rotary and mission systems|11.2|6.6|0.4|18.2|
|space|8.6|1.9|6.7|17.2|
|corporate activities|2.7|0.9|2014|3.6|
|total|33.8|14.3|23.3|71.4|
we believe our facilities are in good condition and adequate for their current use.wemay improve , replace or reduce facilities as considered appropriate to meet the needs of our operations . item 3 . legal proceedings we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment and are subject to contingencies related to certain businesses we previously owned . these types of matters could result in fines , penalties , compensatory or treble damages or non-monetary sanctions or relief . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of each of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole , notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular interim reporting period . we cannot predict the outcome of legal or other proceedings with certainty . these matters include the proceedings summarized in 201cnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies 201d included in our notes to consolidated financial statements . we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign requirements for protection of the environment , including those for discharge ofhazardousmaterials and remediationof contaminated sites.due inpart to thecomplexity andpervasivenessof these requirements , we are a party to or have property subject to various lawsuits , proceedings and remediation obligations . the extent of our financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this time . for information regarding these matters , including current estimates of the amounts that we believe are required for remediation or clean-up to the extent estimable , see 201ccriticalaccounting policies - environmental matters 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and 201cnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments andcontingencies 201d included in ournotes to consolidated financial statements . as a u.s . government contractor , we are subject to various audits and investigations by the u.s . government to determine whetherouroperations arebeingconducted in accordancewith applicable regulatory requirements.u.s.government investigations of us , whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons , could result in administrative , civil , or criminal liabilities , including repayments , fines or penalties being imposed upon us , suspension , proposed debarment , debarment from eligibility for future u.s . government contracting , or suspension of export privileges . suspension or debarment could have a material adverse effect on us because of our dependence on contracts with the u.s . government . u.s . government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us . we also provide products and services to customers outside of the u.s. , which are subject to u.s . and foreign laws and regulations and foreign procurement policies and practices . our compliance with local regulations or applicable u.s . government regulations also may be audited or investigated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what percentage of square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2017 are in the aeronautics segment?
Answer: | 0.30112 |
FINQA3702 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .
|2014:|high|low|
|january 1 2014 to march 31 2014|$ 67.16|$ 57.99|
|april 1 2014 to june 30 2014|$ 59.65|$ 50.30|
|july 1 2014 to september 30 2014|$ 62.05|$ 47.50|
|october 1 2014 to december 31 2014|$ 73.25|$ 61.15|
|2013:|high|low|
|january 1 2013 to march 31 2013|$ 41.85|$ 34.79|
|april 1 2013 to june 30 2013|$ 47.80|$ 37.09|
|july 1 2013 to september 30 2013|$ 61.47|$ 47.59|
|october 1 2013 to december 31 2013|$ 70.60|$ 61.34|
.
Question: by how much did the high of mktx stock increase from april 12 , 2014 to march 31 , 2014?
Answer: | 0.1259 |
FINQA3703 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: intangible assets such as patents , customer-related intangible assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives . the weighted-average useful lives approximate the following: .
|customer relationships|25|years|
|trademarks|25|years|
|completed technology/patents|10|years|
|other|25|years|
recoverability of intangible assets with finite useful lives is assessed in the same manner as property , plant and equipment as described above . income taxes : for purposes of the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the spin-off , income tax expense has been recorded as if the company filed tax returns on a stand-alone basis separate from ingersoll rand . this separate return methodology applies the accounting guidance for income taxes to the stand-alone financial statements as if the company was a stand-alone enterprise for the periods prior to the spin-off . therefore , cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of the company 2019s actual tax balances prior to or subsequent to the spin-off . cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 10.4 million and $ 80.6 million , respectively . the 2016 net cash income taxes paid includes a refund of $ 46.2 million received from the canadian tax authorities . the income tax accounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 include income taxes payable and deferred taxes allocated to the company at the time of the spin-off . the calculation of the company 2019s income taxes involves considerable judgment and the use of both estimates and allocations . deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse . the company recognizes future tax benefits , such as net operating losses and tax credits , to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered in its judgment to be more likely than not . the company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets considering its historic profitability , projected future taxable income , timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the feasibility of its tax planning strategies . where appropriate , the company records a valuation allowance with respect to a future tax benefit . product warranties : standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available . revenue recognition : revenue is recognized and earned when all of the following criteria are satisfied : ( a ) persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists ; ( b ) the price is fixed or determinable ; ( c ) collectability is reasonably assured ; and ( d ) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered . delivery generally occurs when the title and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer . both the persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement and fixed or determinable price criteria are deemed to be satisfied upon receipt of an executed and legally binding sales agreement or contract that clearly defines the terms and conditions of the transaction including the respective obligations of the parties . if the defined terms and conditions allow variability in all or a component of the price , revenue is not recognized until such time that the price becomes fixed or determinable . at the point of sale , the company validates the existence of an enforceable claim that requires payment within a reasonable amount of time and assesses the collectability of that claim . if collectability is not deemed to be reasonably assured , then revenue recognition is deferred until such time that collectability becomes probable or cash is received . delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership . service and installation revenue are recognized when earned . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the delivered product or service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the acceptance terms specified in the arrangement are fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . if uncertainty exists about customer acceptance , revenue is not recognized until acceptance has occurred . the company offers various sales incentive programs to our customers , dealers , and distributors . sales incentive programs do not preclude revenue recognition , but do require an accrual for the company 2019s best estimate of expected activity . examples of the sales incentives that are accrued for as a contra receivable and sales deduction at the point of sale include , but are not limited to , discounts ( i.e . net 30 type ) , coupons , and rebates where the customer does not have to provide any additional requirements to receive the discount . sales returns and customer disputes involving a question of quantity or price are also accounted for as a .
Question: what is the percentage of the refund received from the canadian tax authorities , in comparison with the total net cash income taxes paid in 2016?
Answer: | 0.5732 |
FINQA3704 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .
||global payments|s&p 500|s&p information technology|
|may 31 2003|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|may 31 2004|137.75|118.33|121.98|
|may 31 2005|205.20|128.07|123.08|
|may 31 2006|276.37|139.14|123.99|
|may 31 2007|238.04|170.85|152.54|
|may 31 2008|281.27|159.41|156.43|
issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .
Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: | 0.3775 |
FINQA3705 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2015 and 2014 , respectively: .
||level 3|
|balance as of january 1 2015|$ 127|
|actual return on assets|12|
|purchases issuances and settlements net|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance as of december 31 2015|$ 136|
purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 balance as of december 31 , 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 127 the company 2019s other postretirement benefit plans are partially funded and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and the risk tolerance of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in june 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of assets relative to liabilities . the initial de-risking asset allocation for the plan was 60% ( 60 % ) return-generating assets and 40% ( 40 % ) liability-driven assets . the investment strategies and policies for the plan reflect a balance of liability driven and return-generating considerations . the objective of minimizing the volatility of assets relative to liabilities is addressed primarily through asset 2014liability matching , asset diversification and hedging . the fixed income target asset allocation matches the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . assets are broadly diversified within asset classes to achieve risk-adjusted returns that in total lower asset volatility relative to the liabilities . the company assesses the investment strategy regularly to ensure actual allocations are in line with target allocations as appropriate . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . the assets of the company 2019s other trusts , within the other postretirement benefit plans , have been primarily invested in equities and fixed income funds . the assets under the various other postretirement benefit trusts are invested differently based on the assets and liabilities of each trust . the obligations of the other postretirement benefit plans are dominated by obligations for the medical bargaining trust . thirty-nine percent and four percent of the total postretirement plan benefit obligations are related to the medical non-bargaining and life insurance trusts , respectively . because expected benefit payments related to the benefit obligations are so far into the future , and the size of the medical non-bargaining and life insurance trusts 2019 obligations are large compared to each trusts 2019 assets , the investment strategy is to allocate a significant portion of the assets 2019 investment to equities , which the company believes will provide the highest long-term return and improve the funding ratio . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what is the total balance of purchases , issuances and settlements at the end of 2015?
Answer: | 73.0 |
FINQA3706 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: is expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2017|2016|2015|2014|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 11173|$ 22503|$ 6154|$ 2815|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the sum of the entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2014 to 2017
Answer: | 42645.0 |
FINQA3707 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .
||mainline operations|wholly-owned regional carriers|total|
|pilots and flight crew training instructors|13100|3200|16300|
|flight attendants|24100|1900|26000|
|maintenance personnel|14400|1800|16200|
|fleet service personnel|16100|3200|19300|
|passenger service personnel|16500|7100|23600|
|administrative and other|14700|2400|17100|
|total|98900|19600|118500|
.
Question: what is the ratio of passenger service personnel to the flight attendants
Answer: | 0.90769 |
FINQA3708 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2018 including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefits payments. .
|2009|$ 19766|
|2010|18182|
|2011|25518|
|2012|21029|
|2013|24578|
|2014 2013 2018|118709|
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to 2007 company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company had a value appreciation program ( 201cvap 201d ) , which was an incentive compensation plan established in 1995 . annual awards were granted to vap participants from 1995 through 1998 , which entitled participants to the net appreciation on a portfolio of securities of members of mastercard international . in 1999 , the vap was replaced by an executive incentive plan ( 201ceip 201d ) and the senior executive incentive plan ( 201cseip 201d ) ( together the 201ceip plans 201d ) ( see note 16 ( share based payments and other benefits ) ) . contributions to the vap have been discontinued , all plan assets have been disbursed and no vap liability remained as of december 31 , 2008 . the company 2019s liability related to the vap at december 31 , 2007 was $ 986 . the expense ( benefit ) was $ ( 6 ) , $ ( 267 ) and $ 3406 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 12 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees and retirees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007. .
Question: what is the variation observed in the expected benefits payment in 2009 and 2010?
Answer: | 1584.0 |
FINQA3709 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: until the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings . changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are attributable to the ineffective portion of the hedges , or of derivatives that are not considered to be highly effective hedges , if any , are immediately recognized in earnings . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.3 billion and $ 1.7 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding interest rate swaps at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 503 million and $ 450 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 15 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . stock-based compensation 2013 compensation cost related to all share-based payments including stock options and restricted stock units is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award . we generally recognize the compensation cost ratably over a three-year vesting period . income taxes 2013 we periodically assess our tax filing exposures related to periods that are open to examination . based on the latest available information , we evaluate our tax positions to determine whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the internal revenue service ( irs ) . if we cannot reach a more-likely-than-not determination , no benefit is recorded . if we determine that the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained , we record the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled . we record interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense on our statements of earnings . interest and penalties are not material . accumulated other comprehensive loss 2013 changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of income taxes , consisted of the following ( in millions ) : postretirement benefit plan adjustments other , net accumulated comprehensive .
||postretirement benefit plan adjustments|other net|accumulated other comprehensive loss|
|balance at january 1 2010|$ -8564 ( 8564 )|$ -31 ( 31 )|$ -8595 ( 8595 )|
|other comprehensive ( loss ) income|-430 ( 430 )|15|-415 ( 415 )|
|balance at december 31 2010|-8994 ( 8994 )|-16 ( 16 )|-9010 ( 9010 )|
|other comprehensive loss|-2192 ( 2192 )|-55 ( 55 )|-2247 ( 2247 )|
|balance at december 31 2011|-11186 ( 11186 )|-71 ( 71 )|-11257 ( 11257 )|
|other comprehensive ( loss ) income|-2346 ( 2346 )|110|-2236 ( 2236 )|
|balance at december 31 2012|$ -13532 ( 13532 )|$ 39|$ -13493 ( 13493 )|
the postretirement benefit plan adjustments are shown net of tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 of $ 7.4 billion , $ 6.1 billion , and $ 4.9 billion . these tax benefits include amounts recognized on our income tax returns as current deductions and deferred income taxes , which will be recognized on our tax returns in future years . see note 7 and note 9 for more information on our income taxes and postretirement plans . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2012 , we retrospectively adopted new guidance issued by the financial accounting standards board by presenting total comprehensive income and the components of net income and other comprehensive loss in two separate but consecutive statements . the adoption of this guidance resulted only in a change in how we present other comprehensive loss in our consolidated financial statements and did not have any impact on our results of operations , financial position , or cash flows. .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the change in the post retirement benefit plan adjustments
Answer: | 0.05021 |
FINQA3710 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 .
|( amounts in millions )|2013|2012|
|cash and cash equivalents|$ 217.6|$ 214.5|
|trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net|531.6|497.9|
|finance receivables 2013 net|374.6|323.1|
|contract receivables 2013 net|68.4|62.7|
|inventories 2013 net|434.4|404.2|
|other current assets|169.6|166.6|
|total current assets|1796.2|1669.0|
|notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt|-113.1 ( 113.1 )|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|accounts payable|-155.6 ( 155.6 )|-142.5 ( 142.5 )|
|other current liabilities|-446.7 ( 446.7 )|-441.5 ( 441.5 )|
|total current liabilities|-715.4 ( 715.4 )|-589.2 ( 589.2 )|
|working capital|$ 1080.8|$ 1079.8|
cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of inventories from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | 0.07472 |
FINQA3711 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: .
||pension benefits|other postretirement benefits|
|2005|$ 125|$ 30|
|2006|132|31|
|2007|143|31|
|2008|154|33|
|2009|166|34|
|2010-2014|1052|193|
|total|$ 1772|$ 352|
18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .
Question: what portion of the total expected payment for benefits is related to pension benefits?
Answer: | 0.83427 |
FINQA3712 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 20000 stock options or 8000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . each option and restricted stock unit award granted in 2011 or prior generally vests in three equal annual installments . each option and restricted stock unit award granted after 2011 generally vests after one year . additionally , each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted shares . each option received as a deferral of the cash retainer immediately vests on the grant date , and each restricted share award vests after one year . upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 6.9 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .
||2014|2013|2012|
|average risk-free interest rate|1.5% ( 1.5 % )|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|
|expected dividend yield|none|none|none|
|expected volatility|31% ( 31 % )|31% ( 31 % )|31% ( 31 % )|
|expected life ( years )|4.6|4.6|4.6|
|fair value per share|$ 23.50|$ 19.47|$ 23.93|
.
Question: what is the expected change according to the model in the fair value per share between 2013 and 2014?
Answer: | 4.03 |
FINQA3713 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011: .
||2012|2011|
|u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries|$ 6410|$ 7388|
|property and casualty insurance subsidiaries|7645|7412|
|total|$ 14055|$ 14800|
statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries , decreased by $ 978 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of approximately $ 425 , a $ 200 increase in reserves on a change in valuation basis , $ 200 transfer of the mutual funds business from the u.s . life insurance companies to the life holding company , and an increase in the asset valuation reserve of $ 115 . as a result of the january 2013 statutory gain from the sale of the retirement plans and individual life businesses , the company's pro forma january 2 , 2013 u.s . life statutory surplus was estimated to be $ 8.1 billion , before approximately $ 1.5 billion in extraordinary dividends and return of capital to hfsg holding company . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries increased by $ 233 , primarily due to statutory net income , after tax , of $ 727 , unrealized gains of $ 249 , and an increase in statutory admitted deferred tax assets of $ 77 , capital contributions of $ 14 , and an increase of statutory admitted assets of $ 7 , partially offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 841 . both net income and dividends are net of interest payments and dividends , respectively , on an intercompany note between hartford holdings , inc . and hartford fire insurance company . the company also holds regulatory capital and surplus for its operations in japan . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.1 billion and $ 1.3 billion as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . statutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s . generally accepted accounting principles ( 201cu.s . gaap 201d ) was $ 22.4 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . the company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cu.s . stat 201d ) was $ 14.1 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . significant differences between u.s . gaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with u.s . stat include the following : 2022 u.s . stat excludes equity of non-insurance and foreign insurance subsidiaries not held by u.s . insurance subsidiaries . 2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s . gaap while those costs are expensed immediately under u.s . 2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s . gaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under u.s . stat . 2022 the assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves is prescribed under u.s . stat , while the assumptions used under u.s . gaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates . the methodologies for determining life insurance reserve amounts may also be different . for example , reserving for living benefit reserves under u.s . stat is generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines , while under u.s . gaap , those same living benefits may be considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves . the sensitivity of these life insurance reserves to changes in equity markets , as applicable , will be different between u.s . gaap and u.s . stat . 2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s . gaap , while u.s . stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . 2022 u.s . stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s . gaap does not . also , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , u.s . stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s . gaap does not . 2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s . gaap , while under u.s . stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the amount of goodwill is limited. .
Question: as of december 312012 what was the percent of the total statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies property and casualty insurance subsidiaries
Answer: | 0.54393 |
FINQA3714 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. .
|in millions except per share amounts|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|year ended december 2012|
|common share repurchases|31.8|39.3|42.0|
|average cost per share|$ 171.79|$ 157.11|$ 110.31|
|total cost of common share repurchases|$ 5469|$ 6175|$ 4637|
total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what were total common equity dividends declared per common share for 2014 and 2013?
Answer: | 4.3 |
FINQA3715 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our class a common stock trades on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cma 201d . at february 8 , 2019 , we had 73 stockholders of record for our class a common stock . we believe that the number of beneficial owners is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a large portion of our class a common stock is held in 201cstreet name 201d by brokers . there is currently no established public trading market for our class b common stock . there were approximately 287 holders of record of our non-voting class b common stock as of february 8 , 2019 , constituting approximately 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) of our total outstanding equity . stock performance graph the graph and table below compare the cumulative total stockholder return of mastercard 2019s class a common stock , the s&p 500 financials and the s&p 500 index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes a $ 100 investment in our class a common stock and both of the indices and the reinvestment of dividends . mastercard 2019s class b common stock is not publicly traded or listed on any exchange or dealer quotation system . total returns to stockholders for each of the years presented were as follows : indexed returns base period for the years ended december 31 .
|company/index|base period 2013|base period 2014|base period 2015|base period 2016|base period 2017|2018|
|mastercard|$ 100.00|$ 103.73|$ 118.05|$ 126.20|$ 186.37|$ 233.56|
|s&p 500 financials|100.00|115.20|113.44|139.31|170.21|148.03|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|113.69|115.26|129.05|157.22|150.33|
.
Question: what was the percent of the growth of the mastercard from 2013 to 2014
Answer: | 0.0373 |
FINQA3716 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .
||shares available for issuance|shares available for future grant|shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum|expect to make new awards|
|amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 )|11.7|5.1|2.3|yes|
|2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )|15.8|3.1|0.0|no|
|2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )|12.8|9.0|0.0|no|
|rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 )|7.9|5.9|0.0|no|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .
Question: what was the weighted average total of the aggregate cost of the per share repurchased from 2017 to 2019
Answer: | 51.60274 |
FINQA3717 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .
||issued|in treasury|shares outstanding|
|balance january 1 2009|1334|-140 ( 140 )|1194|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|4|4|
|vesting of restricted stock|2013|1|1|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|4|4|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-8 ( 8 )|-8 ( 8 )|
|balance december 31 2009|1334|-139 ( 139 )|1195|
|acquisition of smith international inc .|100|76|176|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|6|6|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|3|3|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-27 ( 27 )|-27 ( 27 )|
|issued on conversions of debentures|2013|8|8|
|balance december 31 2010|1434|-73 ( 73 )|1361|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|6|6|
|vesting of restricted stock|2013|1|1|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|3|3|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-37 ( 37 )|-37 ( 37 )|
|balance december 31 2011|1434|-100 ( 100 )|1334|
see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the total of shares ( millions ) issued to employees in the 3 year period?
Answer: | 26.0 |
FINQA3718 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 132 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report unpaid principal balance due to negative amortization of option arms was $ 24 million and $ 78 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the firm estimates the following balances of option arm loans will experience a recast that results in a payment increase : $ 72 million in 2011 , $ 241 million in 2012 and $ 784 million in 2013 . the firm did not originate option arms and new originations of option arms were discontinued by washington mutual prior to the date of jpmorgan chase 2019s acquisition of its banking operations . subprime mortgages at december 31 , 2010 were $ 11.3 billion , compared with $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the decrease was due to paydowns and charge-offs on delinquent loans , partially offset by the addition of loans as a result of the adoption of the accounting guidance related to vies . late-stage delinquencies remained elevated but continued to improve , albeit at a slower rate during the second half of the year , while early-stage delinquencies stabilized at an elevated level during this period . nonaccrual loans improved largely as a result of the improvement in late-stage delinquencies . charge-offs reflected modest improvement . auto : auto loans at december 31 , 2010 , were $ 48.4 billion , compared with $ 46.0 billion at december 31 , 2009 . delinquent and nonaccrual loans have decreased . in addition , net charge-offs have declined 52% ( 52 % ) from the prior year . provision expense de- creased due to favorable loss severity as a result of a strong used- car market nationwide and reduced loss frequency due to the tightening of underwriting criteria in earlier periods . the auto loan portfolio reflected a high concentration of prime quality credits . business banking : business banking loans at december 31 , 2010 , were $ 16.8 billion , compared with $ 17.0 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the decrease was primarily a result of run-off of the washington mutual portfolio and charge-offs on delinquent loans . these loans primarily include loans which are highly collateralized , often with personal loan guarantees . nonaccrual loans continued to remain elevated . after having increased during the first half of 2010 , nonaccrual loans as of december 31 , 2010 , declined to year-end 2009 levels . student and other : student and other loans at december 31 , 2010 , including loans held-for-sale , were $ 15.3 billion , compared with $ 16.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 . other loans primarily include other secured and unsecured consumer loans . delinquencies reflected some stabilization in the second half of 2010 , but remained elevated . charge-offs during 2010 remained relatively flat with 2009 levels reflecting the impact of elevated unemployment levels . purchased credit-impaired loans : pci loans at december 31 , 2010 , were $ 72.8 billion compared with $ 81.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 . this portfolio represents loans acquired in the washing- ton mutual transaction that were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition . that fair value included an estimate of credit losses expected to be realized over the remaining lives of the loans , and therefore no allowance for loan losses was recorded for these loans as of the acquisition date . the firm regularly updates the amount of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected for these loans . probable decreases in expected loan principal cash flows would trigger the recognition of impairment through the provision for loan losses . probable and significant increases in expected cash flows ( e.g. , decreased principal credit losses , the net benefit of modifications ) would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses , with any remaining increase in the expected cash flows recognized prospectively in interest income over the remaining estimated lives of the underlying loans . during 2010 , management concluded as part of the firm 2019s regular assessment of the pci pools that it was probable that higher expected principal credit losses would result in a decrease in expected cash flows . accordingly , the firm recognized an aggregate $ 3.4 billion impairment related to the home equity , prime mortgage , option arm and subprime mortgage pci portfolios . as a result of this impairment , the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses for the home equity , prime mortgage , option arm and subprime mortgage pci portfolios was $ 1.6 billion , $ 1.8 billion , $ 1.5 billion and $ 98 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2010 , compared with an allowance for loan losses of $ 1.1 billion and $ 491 million for the prime mortgage and option arm pci portfolios , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 . approximately 39% ( 39 % ) of the option arm borrowers were delinquent , 5% ( 5 % ) were making interest-only or negatively amortizing payments , and 56% ( 56 % ) were making amortizing payments . approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of current borrowers are subject to risk of payment shock due to future payment recast ; substantially all of the remaining loans have been modified to a fixed rate fully amortizing loan . the cumulative amount of unpaid interest added to the unpaid principal balance of the option arm pci pool was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.9 billion at de- cember 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the firm estimates the following balances of option arm pci loans will experience a recast that results in a payment increase : $ 1.2 billion in 2011 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 508 million in 2013 . the following table provides a summary of lifetime loss estimates included in both the nonaccretable difference and the allowance for loan losses . principal charge-offs will not be recorded on these pools until the nonaccretable difference has been fully depleted . lifetime loss estimates ( a ) ltd liquidation losses ( b ) .
|december 31 ( in millions )|lifetime loss estimates ( a ) 2010|lifetime loss estimates ( a ) 2009|lifetime loss estimates ( a ) 2010|2009|
|option arms|$ 11588|$ 10650|$ 4860|$ 1744|
|home equity|14698|13138|8810|6060|
|prime mortgage|4870|4240|1495|794|
|subprime mortgage|3732|3842|1250|796|
|total|$ 34888|$ 31870|$ 16415|$ 9394|
( a ) includes the original nonaccretable difference established in purchase accounting of $ 30.5 billion for principal losses only . the remaining nonaccretable difference for principal losses only was $ 14.1 billion and $ 21.1 billion at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . all probable increases in principal losses and foregone interest subsequent to the purchase date are reflected in the allowance for loan losses . ( b ) life-to-date ( 201cltd 201d ) liquidation losses represent realization of loss upon loan resolution. .
Question: in the consumer loan business , what percent of the adjustable rate borrowers weren't making any principal payments?
Answer: | 61.0 |
FINQA3719 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: corporate & institutional banking corporate & institutional banking earned $ 1.9 billion in 2011 and $ 1.8 billion in 2010 . the increase in earnings was primarily due to an improvement in the provision for credit losses , which was a benefit in 2011 , partially offset by a reduction in the value of commercial mortgage servicing rights and lower net interest income . we continued to focus on adding new clients , increasing cross sales , and remaining committed to strong expense discipline . asset management group asset management group earned $ 141 million for 2011 compared with $ 137 million for 2010 . assets under administration were $ 210 billion at december 31 , 2011 and $ 212 billion at december 31 , 2010 . earnings for 2011 reflected a benefit from the provision for credit losses and growth in noninterest income , partially offset by higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income . for 2011 , the business delivered strong sales production , grew high value clients and benefitted from significant referrals from other pnc lines of business . over time and with stabilized market conditions , the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income . residential mortgage banking residential mortgage banking earned $ 87 million in 2011 compared with $ 269 million in 2010 . the decline in earnings was driven by an increase in noninterest expense associated with increased costs for residential mortgage foreclosure- related expenses , primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , and lower net interest income , partially offset by an increase in loan originations and higher loans sales revenue . blackrock our blackrock business segment earned $ 361 million in 2011 and $ 351 million in 2010 . the higher business segment earnings from blackrock for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily due to an increase in revenue . non-strategic assets portfolio this business segment ( formerly distressed assets portfolio ) consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy . non-strategic assets portfolio had earnings of $ 200 million in 2011 compared with a loss of $ 57 million in 2010 . the increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by lower net interest income . 201cother 201d reported earnings of $ 376 million for 2011 compared with earnings of $ 386 million for 2010 . the decrease in earnings primarily reflected the noncash charge related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the gain related to the sale of a portion of pnc 2019s blackrock shares in 2010 partially offset by lower integration costs in 2011 . consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2011 was $ 3.1 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion for 2010 . results for 2011 include the impact of $ 324 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , a $ 198 million noncash charge related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $ 42 million for integration costs . results for 2010 included the $ 328 million after-tax gain on our sale of gis , $ 387 million for integration costs , and $ 71 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses . for 2010 , net income attributable to common shareholders was also impacted by a noncash reduction of $ 250 million in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock . pnc 2019s results for 2011 were driven by good performance in a challenging environment of low interest rates , slow economic growth and new regulations . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2011 2010 .
|year ended december 31dollars in millions|2011|2010|
|net interest income|$ 8700|$ 9230|
|net interest margin|3.92% ( 3.92 % )|4.14% ( 4.14 % )|
changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion in the consolidated balance sheet review in item 7 of this report for additional information . the decreases in net interest income and net interest margin for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily attributable to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion on purchased impaired loans primarily due to lower excess cash recoveries . a decline in average loan balances and the low interest rate environment , partially offset by lower funding costs , also contributed to the decrease . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 35 .
Question: in 2011 and 2010 what was the average net interest income in millions
Answer: | 8966.0 |
FINQA3720 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships and rabbi trusts . limited partnerships are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .
|( dollars in thousands )|years ended december 31 , 2014|years ended december 31 , 2013|
|reinsurance receivables and premium receivables|$ 29497|$ 29905|
.
Question: what was the change in the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2014 to 2013 in thousands
Answer: | -408.0 |
FINQA3721 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: totaled $ 12 million , $ 13 million and $ 9 million for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all of the company 2019s contributions are invested in one or more funds at the direction of the employees . note 16 : commitments and contingencies commitments have been made in connection with certain construction programs . the estimated capital expenditures required under legal and binding contractual obligations amounted to $ 419 million as of december 31 , 2018 . the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries maintain agreements with other water purveyors for the purchase of water to supplement their water supply . the following table provides the future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable: .
||amount|
|2019|$ 65|
|2020|65|
|2021|65|
|2022|64|
|2023|57|
|thereafter|641|
the company enters into agreements for the provision of services to water and wastewater facilities for the united states military , municipalities and other customers . see note 3 2014revenue recognition for additional information regarding the company 2019s performance obligations . contingencies the company is routinely involved in legal actions incident to the normal conduct of its business . as of december 31 , 2018 , the company has accrued approximately $ 54 million of probable loss contingencies and has estimated that the maximum amount of losses associated with reasonably possible loss contingencies that can be reasonably estimated is $ 26 million . for certain matters , claims and actions , the company is unable to estimate possible losses . the company believes that damages or settlements , if any , recovered by plaintiffs in such matters , claims or actions , other than as described in this note 16 2014commitments and contingencies , will not have a material adverse effect on the company . west virginia elk river freedom industries chemical spill on june 8 , 2018 , the u.s . district court for the southern district of west virginia granted final approval of a settlement class and global class action settlement ( the 201csettlement 201d ) for all claims and potential claims by all putative class members ( collectively , the 201cplaintiffs 201d ) arising out of the january 2014 freedom industries , inc . chemical spill in west virginia . the effective date of the settlement is july 16 , 2018 . under the terms and conditions of the settlement , west virginia-american water company ( 201cwvawc 201d ) and certain other company affiliated entities ( collectively , the 201camerican water defendants 201d ) did not admit , and will not admit , any fault or liability for any of the allegations made by the plaintiffs in any of the actions that were resolved . under federal class action rules , claimants had the right , until december 8 , 2017 , to elect to opt out of the final settlement . less than 100 of the 225000 estimated putative class members elected to opt out from the settlement , and these claimants will not receive any benefit from or be bound by the terms of the settlement . in june 2018 , the company and its remaining non-participating general liability insurance carrier settled for a payment to the company of $ 20 million , out of a maximum of $ 25 million in potential coverage under the terms of the relevant policy , in exchange for a full release by the american water defendants of all claims against the insurance carrier related to the freedom industries chemical spill. .
Question: what percentage of future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable are due after 2023?
Answer: | 957.0 |
FINQA3722 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 114 million in gross wholesale revenue due to an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales and an increase in sales to affiliated customers ; an increase of $ 106.1 million in production cost allocation rider revenues which became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as a result of the system agreement proceedings , entergy arkansas also has a corresponding increase in deferred fuel expense for payments to other entergy system companies such that there is no effect on net income . entergy arkansas makes payments over a seven-month period but collections from customers occur over a twelve-month period . the production cost allocation rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements and the system agreement proceedings are referenced below under "federal regulation" ; and an increase of $ 58.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to changes in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2008 and september 2008 , partially offset by decreased usage . the energy cost recovery rider filings are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 14.6 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $ 106.1 million in deferred system agreement payments , as discussed above and an increase in the average market price of purchased power . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 1074.5|
|net wholesale revenue|13.2|
|transmission revenue|11.8|
|deferred fuel costs revisions|8.6|
|other|2.5|
|2007 net revenue|$ 1110.6|
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower wholesale revenues in the third quarter 2006 due to an october 2006 ferc order requiring entergy arkansas to make a refund to a coal plant co-owner resulting from a contract dispute , in addition to re-pricing revisions , retroactive to 2003 , of $ 5.9 million of purchased power agreements among entergy system companies as directed by the ferc . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance is primarily due to the 2006 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter 2007 , which increased net revenue by $ 6.6 million . gross operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 173.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a decrease in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2007 . the energy cost recovery rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the decrease was partially offset by production cost allocation rider revenues of $ 124.1 million that became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as .
Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: | -0.0325 |
FINQA3723 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .
|2006|$ 24569|
|2007|21086|
|2008|14716|
|2009|9801|
|2010|6670|
|thereafter|37130|
|total|$ 113972|
capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .
Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: | 0.08485 |
FINQA3724 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the company concluded that the acquisition of sentinelle medical did not represent a material business combination , and therefore , no pro forma financial information has been provided herein . subsequent to the acquisition date , the company 2019s results of operations include the results of sentinelle medical , which is included within the company 2019s breast health reporting segment . the company accounted for the sentinelle medical acquisition as a purchase of a business under asc 805 . the purchase price was comprised of an $ 84.8 million cash payment , which was net of certain adjustments , plus three contingent payments up to a maximum of an additional $ 250.0 million in cash . the contingent payments are based on a multiple of incremental revenue growth during the two-year period following the completion of the acquisition as follows : six months after acquisition , 12 months after acquisition , and 24 months after acquisition . pursuant to asc 805 , the company recorded its estimate of the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on future revenue projections of the sentinelle medical business under various potential scenarios and weighted probability assumptions of these outcomes . as of the date of acquisition , these cash flow projections were discounted using a rate of 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) . the discount rate is based on the weighted-average cost of capital of the acquired business plus a credit risk premium for non-performance risk related to the liability pursuant to asc 820 . this analysis resulted in an initial contingent consideration liability of $ 29.5 million , which will be adjusted periodically as a component of operating expenses based on changes in the fair value of the liability driven by the accretion of the liability for the time value of money and changes in the assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined revenue growth milestones . this fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represented a level 3 measurement as defined in asc during each quarter in fiscal 2011 , the company has re-evaluated its assumptions and updated the revenue and probability assumptions for future earn-out periods and lowered its projections . as a result of these adjustments , which were partially offset by the accretion of the liability , and using a current discount rate of approximately 17.0% ( 17.0 % ) , the company recorded a reversal of expense of $ 14.3 million in fiscal 2011 to record the contingent consideration liability at fair value . in addition , during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the first earn-out period ended , and the company adjusted the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for actual results during the earn-out period . this payment of $ 4.3 million was made in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . at september 24 , 2011 , the fair value of the liability is $ 10.9 million . the company did not issue any equity awards in connection with this acquisition . the company incurred third-party transaction costs of $ 1.2 million , which were expensed within general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2010 . the purchase price was as follows: .
|cash|$ 84751|
|contingent consideration|29500|
|total purchase price|$ 114251|
source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what portion of the sentinelle medical's purchase price was paid in cash?
Answer: | 0.7418 |
FINQA3725 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .
|( dollars in thousands )|2010|2009|2008|
|balance at january 1|$ 29010|$ 34366|$ 29132|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|7119|6997|5234|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|-|-|-|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-|-|-|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-12356 ( 12356 )|-12353 ( 12353 )|-|
|lapses of applicable statutes of limitations|-|-|-|
|balance at december 31|$ 23773|$ 29010|$ 34366|
the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the percent change of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2009?
Answer: | -0.15585 |
FINQA3726 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents item 1b . unresolved staff comments we have no unresolved sec staff comments to report . item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2015 , we owned or leased 126 major manufacturing sites and 14 major technical centers . a manufacturing site may include multiple plants and may be wholly or partially owned or leased . we also have many smaller manufacturing sites , sales offices , warehouses , engineering centers , joint ventures and other investments strategically located throughout the world . we have a presence in 44 countries . the following table shows the regional distribution of our major manufacturing sites by the operating segment that uses such facilities : north america europe , middle east & africa asia pacific south america total .
||north america|europemiddle east& africa|asia pacific|south america|total|
|electrical/electronic architecture|30|32|25|5|92|
|powertrain systems|4|10|5|2|21|
|electronics and safety|3|7|3|2014|13|
|total|37|49|33|7|126|
in addition to these manufacturing sites , we had 14 major technical centers : four in north america ; five in europe , middle east and africa ; four in asia pacific ; and one in south america . of our 126 major manufacturing sites and 14 major technical centers , which include facilities owned or leased by our consolidated subsidiaries , 77 are primarily owned and 63 are primarily leased . we frequently review our real estate portfolio and develop footprint strategies to support our customers 2019 global plans , while at the same time supporting our technical needs and controlling operating expenses . we believe our evolving portfolio will meet current and anticipated future needs . item 3 . legal proceedings we are from time to time subject to various actions , claims , suits , government investigations , and other proceedings incidental to our business , including those arising out of alleged defects , breach of contracts , competition and antitrust matters , product warranties , intellectual property matters , personal injury claims and employment-related matters . it is our opinion that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations , or cash flows . with respect to warranty matters , although we cannot ensure that the future costs of warranty claims by customers will not be material , we believe our established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements . however , the final amounts required to resolve these matters could differ materially from our recorded estimates . gm ignition switch recall in the first quarter of 2014 , gm , delphi 2019s largest customer , initiated a product recall related to ignition switches . delphi received requests for information from , and cooperated with , various government agencies related to this ignition switch recall . in addition , delphi was initially named as a co-defendant along with gm ( and in certain cases other parties ) in class action and product liability lawsuits related to this matter . as of december 31 , 2015 , delphi was not named as a defendant in any class action complaints . although no assurances can be made as to the ultimate outcome of these or any other future claims , delphi does not believe a loss is probable and , accordingly , no reserve has been made as of december 31 , 2015 . unsecured creditors litigation the fourth amended and restated limited liability partnership agreement of delphi automotive llp ( the 201cfourth llp agreement 201d ) was entered into on july 12 , 2011 by the members of delphi automotive llp in order to position the company for its initial public offering . under the terms of the fourth llp agreement , if cumulative distributions to the members of delphi automotive llp under certain provisions of the fourth llp agreement exceed $ 7.2 billion , delphi , as disbursing agent on behalf of dphh , is required to pay to the holders of allowed general unsecured claims against dphh $ 32.50 for every $ 67.50 in excess of $ 7.2 billion distributed to the members , up to a maximum amount of $ 300 million . in december 2014 , a complaint was filed in the bankruptcy court alleging that the redemption by delphi automotive llp of the membership interests of gm and the pbgc , and the repurchase of shares and payment of dividends by delphi automotive plc , constituted distributions under the terms of the fourth llp agreement approximating $ 7.2 billion . delphi considers cumulative .
Question: what percentage of major manufacturing sites are in europe middle east& africa?
Answer: | 0.38889 |
FINQA3727 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries ; and 2022 sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies . subject to certain exceptions , the indentures governing the senior subordinated notes and the senior discount notes permit the issuers of the notes and their restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness , including secured indebtedness . in addition , the senior credit facilities require bcp crystal to maintain the following financial covenants : a maximum total leverage ratio , a maximum bank debt leverage ratio , a minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures limitation . the maximum consolidated net bank debt to adjusted ebitda ratio , as defined , previously required under the senior credit facilities , was eliminated when the company amended the facilities in january 2005 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants related to its debt agreements . principal payments scheduled to be made on the company 2019s debt , including short term borrowings , is as follows : ( in $ millions ) .
||total ( in $ millions )|
|2007|309|
|2008|25|
|2009|50|
|2010|39|
|2011|1485|
|thereafter ( 1 )|1590|
|total|3498|
( 1 ) includes $ 2 million purchase accounting adjustment to assumed debt . 17 . benefit obligations pension obligations . pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement , disability and surviving dependent pensions . the benefits offered vary according to the legal , fiscal and economic conditions of each country . the commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans , primarily in the u.s . benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee 2019s compensation . supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are non-qualified for u.s . tax purposes . separate trusts have been established for some non-qualified plans . the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in north america , europe and asia . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company 2019s u.s . qualified pension plan represented greater than 84% ( 84 % ) and 76% ( 76 % ) of celanese 2019s pension plan assets and liabilities , respectively . independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans . pension costs under the company 2019s retirement plans are actuarially determined . the company sponsors various defined contribution plans in north america , europe , and asia covering certain employees . employees may contribute to these plans and the company will match these contributions in varying amounts . the company 2019s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $ 11 million , $ 12 million , $ 8 million and $ 3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the nine months ended december 31 , 2004 and the three months ended march 31 , 2004 , respectively . celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what portion of the company's debt is due in the next 12 months?
Answer: | 0.08834 |
FINQA3728 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: anticipated or possible short-term cash needs , prevailing interest rates , our investment policy and alternative investment choices . a majority of our cash and cash equivalents balance is invested in money market mutual funds that invest only in u.s . treasury securities or u.s . government agency securities . our exposure to risk is minimal given the nature of the investments . our practice is to have our pension plan 100% ( 100 % ) funded at each year end on a projected benefit obligation basis , while also satisfying any minimum required contribution and obtaining the maximum tax deduction . based on our actuarial projections , we estimate that a $ 14.1 million contribution in 2011 will allow us to meet our funding goal . however , the amount of the actual contribution is contingent on the actual rate of return on our plan assets during 2011 and the december 31 , 2011 discount rate . net current deferred tax assets of $ 18.3 million and $ 23.8 million are included in other current assets at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . total net current deferred tax assets include unrealized losses , stock- based compensation and accrued expenses . net long-term deferred tax liabilities were $ 7.8 billion and $ 7.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . net deferred tax liabilities are principally the result of purchase accounting for intangible assets in our various mergers including cbot holdings and nymex holdings . we have a long-term deferred tax asset of $ 145.7 million included within our domestic long-term deferred tax liability . this deferred tax asset is for an unrealized capital loss incurred in brazil related to our investment in bm&fbovespa . as of december 31 , 2010 , we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to fully realize the value of the unrealized capital loss . as a result , a partial valuation allowance of $ 64.4 million has been provided for the amount of the unrealized capital loss that exceeds potential capital gains that could be used to offset the capital loss in future periods . we also have a long-term deferred tax asset related to brazilian taxes of $ 125.3 million for an unrealized capital loss incurred in brazil related to our investment in bm&fbovespa . a full valuation allowance of $ 125.3 million has been provided because we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of the unrealized capital loss in brazil in the future . valuation allowances of $ 49.4 million have also been provided for additional unrealized capital losses on various other investments . net long-term deferred tax assets also include a $ 19.3 million deferred tax asset for foreign net operating losses related to swapstream . our assessment at december 31 , 2010 was that we did not currently meet the more-likely- than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of acquired and accumulated foreign net operating losses in the future . as a result , the $ 19.3 million deferred tax assets arising from these net operating losses have been fully reserved . each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain specified performance bond collateral . performance bond requirements are determined by parameters established by the risk management department of the clearing house and may fluctuate over time . we accept a variety of collateral to satisfy performance bond requirements . cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions are included in our consolidated balance sheets . clearing firm deposits , other than those retained in the form of cash , are not included in our consolidated balance sheets . the balances in cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions may fluctuate significantly over time . cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions consisted of the following at december 31: .
|( in millions )|2010|2009|
|cash performance bonds|$ 3717.0|$ 5834.6|
|cash guaranty fund contributions|231.8|102.6|
|cross-margin arrangements|79.7|10.6|
|performance collateral for delivery|10.0|34.1|
|total|$ 4038.5|$ 5981.9|
.
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions from cash performance bonds
Answer: | 0.92039 |
FINQA3729 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: .
|company|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal|owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro|
|entergy arkansas|4774|1668|1823|1209|74|
|entergy gulf states louisiana|3317|1980|974|363|-|
|entergy louisiana|5424|4265|1159|-|-|
|entergy mississippi|3229|2809|-|420|-|
|entergy new orleans|764|764|-|-|-|
|entergy texas|2538|2269|-|269|-|
|system energy|1071|-|1071|-|-|
|total|21117|13755|5027|2261|74|
( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the "portfolio transformation strategy" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .
Question: what portion of the total capabilities is generated from coal stations for entergy arkansas?
Answer: | 0.25325 |
FINQA3730 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: is used to monitor the risk in the loan classes . loans with higher fico scores and lower ltvs tend to have a lower level of risk . conversely , loans with lower fico scores , higher ltvs , and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk . in the first quarter of 2013 , we refined our process for the home equity and residential real estate asset quality indicators shown in the following tables . these refinements include , but are not limited to , improvements in the process for determining lien position and ltv in both table 67 and table 68 . additionally , as of the first quarter of 2013 , we are now presenting table 67 at recorded investment as opposed to our prior presentation of outstanding balance . table 68 continues to be presented at outstanding balance . both the 2013 and 2012 period end balance disclosures are presented in the below tables using this refined process . consumer purchased impaired loan class estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the credit impacts of consumer purchased impaired loans . consumer cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items , which include , but are not limited to : estimated real estate values , payment patterns , updated fico scores , the current economic environment , updated ltv ratios and the date of origination . these key factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are mitigated and cash flows are maximized . see note 6 purchased loans for additional information . table 66 : home equity and residential real estate balances in millions december 31 december 31 home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 excluding purchased impaired loans ( a ) $ 44376 $ 42725 home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 purchased impaired loans ( b ) 5548 6638 government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages ( a ) 1704 2279 purchase accounting adjustments 2013 purchased impaired loans ( 116 ) ( 482 ) total home equity and residential real estate loans ( a ) $ 51512 $ 51160 ( a ) represents recorded investment . ( b ) represents outstanding balance . 136 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
|in millions|december 31 2013|december 31 2012|
|home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 excluding purchased impaired loans ( a )|$ 44376|$ 42725|
|home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 purchased impaired loans ( b )|5548|6638|
|government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages ( a )|1704|2279|
|purchase accounting adjustments 2013 purchased impaired loans|-116 ( 116 )|-482 ( 482 )|
|total home equity and residential real estate loans ( a )|$ 51512|$ 51160|
is used to monitor the risk in the loan classes . loans with higher fico scores and lower ltvs tend to have a lower level of risk . conversely , loans with lower fico scores , higher ltvs , and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk . in the first quarter of 2013 , we refined our process for the home equity and residential real estate asset quality indicators shown in the following tables . these refinements include , but are not limited to , improvements in the process for determining lien position and ltv in both table 67 and table 68 . additionally , as of the first quarter of 2013 , we are now presenting table 67 at recorded investment as opposed to our prior presentation of outstanding balance . table 68 continues to be presented at outstanding balance . both the 2013 and 2012 period end balance disclosures are presented in the below tables using this refined process . consumer purchased impaired loan class estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the credit impacts of consumer purchased impaired loans . consumer cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items , which include , but are not limited to : estimated real estate values , payment patterns , updated fico scores , the current economic environment , updated ltv ratios and the date of origination . these key factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are mitigated and cash flows are maximized . see note 6 purchased loans for additional information . table 66 : home equity and residential real estate balances in millions december 31 december 31 home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 excluding purchased impaired loans ( a ) $ 44376 $ 42725 home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 purchased impaired loans ( b ) 5548 6638 government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages ( a ) 1704 2279 purchase accounting adjustments 2013 purchased impaired loans ( 116 ) ( 482 ) total home equity and residential real estate loans ( a ) $ 51512 $ 51160 ( a ) represents recorded investment . ( b ) represents outstanding balance . 136 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: was december 31 2013 home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 excluding purchased impaired loans greater than purchased impaired loans?
Answer: | yes |
FINQA3731 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( "pps" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( "us gaap" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) .
||as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )|
|infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg|39|
|infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg|27|
|infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg|32|
raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the cash dividends received by the company in 2011 compare to 2010?
Answer: | 0.09859 |
FINQA3732 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 7 in 2006 , cash provided by financing activities was $ 291 million which was primarily due to the proceeds from employee stock plans ( $ 442 million ) and an increase in debt of $ 1.5 billion partially offset by the repurchase of 17.99 million shares of schlumberger stock ( $ 1.07 billion ) and the payment of dividends to shareholders ( $ 568 million ) . schlumberger believes that at december 31 , 2006 , cash and short-term investments of $ 3.0 billion and available and unused credit facilities of $ 2.2 billion are sufficient to meet future business requirements for at least the next twelve months . summary of major contractual commitments ( stated in millions ) .
|contractual commitments|total|payment period 2007|payment period 2008 - 2009|payment period 2010 - 2011|payment period after 2011|
|debt1|$ 5986|$ 1322|$ 2055|$ 1961|$ 648|
|operating leases|$ 691|$ 191|$ 205|$ 106|$ 189|
|purchase obligations2|$ 1526|$ 1490|$ 36|$ 2013|$ 2013|
purchase obligations 2 $ 1526 $ 1490 $ 36 $ 2013 $ 2013 1 . excludes future payments for interest . includes amounts relating to the $ 1425 million of convertible debentures which are described in note 11 of the consolidated financial statements . 2 . represents an estimate of contractual obligations in the ordinary course of business . although these contractual obligations are considered enforceable and legally binding , the terms generally allow schlumberger the option to reschedule and adjust their requirements based on business needs prior to the delivery of goods . refer to note 4 of the consolidated financial statements for details regarding potential commitments associated with schlumberger 2019s prior business acquisitions . refer to note 20 of the consolidated financial statements for details regarding schlumberger 2019s pension and other postretirement benefit obligations . schlumberger has outstanding letters of credit/guarantees which relate to business performance bonds , custom/excise tax commitments , facility lease/rental obligations , etc . these were entered into in the ordinary course of business and are customary practices in the various countries where schlumberger operates . critical accounting policies and estimates the preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states requires schlumberger to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses . the following accounting policies involve 201ccritical accounting estimates 201d because they are particularly dependent on estimates and assumptions made by schlumberger about matters that are inherently uncertain . a summary of all of schlumberger 2019s significant accounting policies is included in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . schlumberger bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances , the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources . actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions . multiclient seismic data the westerngeco segment capitalizes the costs associated with obtaining multiclient seismic data . the carrying value of the multiclient seismic data library at december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 227 million , $ 222 million and $ 347 million , respectively . such costs are charged to cost of goods sold and services based on the percentage of the total costs to the estimated total revenue that schlumberger expects to receive from the sales of such data . however , except as described below under 201cwesterngeco purchase accounting , 201d under no circumstance will an individual survey carry a net book value greater than a 4-year straight-lined amortized value. .
Question: what percentage of debt repayment will take place during 2008-2009?
Answer: | 0.3433 |
FINQA3733 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|3964|1652|5616|
|leased|845|1153|1998|
|total|4809|2805|7614|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what portion of the company's property is located in united states?
Answer: | 0.73759 |
FINQA3734 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 30 2018 ppg annual report and 10-k foreign currency translation partially offset by : cost reclassifications associated with the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard . refer to note 2 , "revenue recognition" within part 2 of this form 10-k cost management including restructuring cost savings 2017 vs . 2016 selling , general and administrative expenses decreased $ 1 million primarily due to : lower net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs lower selling and advertising costs restructuring cost savings partially offset by : wage and other cost inflation selling , general and administrative expenses from acquired businesses foreign currency translation other charges and other income .
|( $ in millions except percentages )|2018|% ( % ) change 2017|% ( % ) change 2016|% ( % ) change 2018 vs . 2017|% ( % ) change 2017 vs . 2016|
|interest expense net of interest income|$ 95|$ 85|$ 99|11.8% ( 11.8 % )|( 14.1 ) % ( % )|
|business restructuring net|$ 66|$ 2014|$ 191|n/a|( 100.0 ) % ( % )|
|pension settlement charges|$ 2014|$ 60|$ 968|( 100.0 ) % ( % )|( 93.8 ) % ( % )|
|other charges|$ 122|$ 74|$ 242|64.9% ( 64.9 % )|( 69.4 ) % ( % )|
|other income|( $ 114 )|( $ 150 )|( $ 127 )|( 24.0 ) % ( % )|18.1% ( 18.1 % )|
interest expense , net of interest income interest expense , net of interest income increased $ 10 million in 2018 versus 2017 primarily due to the issuance of long- term debt in early 2018 . interest expense , net of interest income decreased $ 14 million in 2017 versus 2016 due to lower interest rate debt outstanding in 2017 . business restructuring , net a pretax restructuring charge of $ 83 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2018 , offset by certain changes in estimates to complete previously recorded programs of $ 17 million . a pretax charge of $ 191 million was recorded in 2016 . refer to note 8 , "business restructuring" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . pension settlement charges during 2017 , ppg made lump-sum payments to certain retirees who had participated in ppg's u.s . qualified and non- qualified pension plans totaling approximately $ 127 million . as the lump-sum payments were in excess of the expected 2017 service and interest costs for the affected plans , ppg remeasured the periodic benefit obligation of these plans in the period payments were made and recorded settlement charges totaling $ 60 million ( $ 38 million after-tax ) during 2017 . during 2016 , ppg permanently transferred approximately $ 1.8 billion of its u.s . and canadian pension obligations and assets to several highly rated insurance companies . these actions triggered remeasurement and partial settlement of certain of the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans . ppg recognized a $ 968 million pre-tax settlement charge in connection with these transactions . refer to note 13 , "employee benefit plans" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other charges other charges in 2018 and 2016 were higher than 2017 primarily due to environmental remediation charges . these charges were principally for environmental remediation at a former chromium manufacturing plant and associated sites in new jersey . refer to note 14 , "commitments and contingent liabilities" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information . other income other income was lower in 2018 and 2016 than in 2017 primarily due to the gain from the sale of the mexican plaka business of $ 25 million and income from a legal settlement of $ 18 million in 2017 . refer to note 3 , "acquisitions and divestitures" in item 8 of this form 10-k for additional information. .
Question: assuming the same change in net interest expense in 2019 as occurred in 2018 , what would the 2019 expense be , in millions?
Answer: | 105.0 |
FINQA3735 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million . tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen . the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million . with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 . approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no . 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas . the sale is expected to close in early 2003 . see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction . the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. .
|as of and for the years ended december 31,|2002|2001|2000|
|revenues|$ 2832|$ 6147|$ 6241|
|operating income|695|1717|1989|
|net income|229|650|859|
|current assets|1097|3700|2423|
|noncurrent assets|6751|14942|13080|
|current liabilities|1418|3510|3370|
|noncurrent liabilities|3349|8297|5927|
|stockholder's equity|3081|6835|6206|
in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what is the implied value of nigen based on the 2000 acquisition?
Answer: | 81.66667 |
FINQA3736 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies lease commitments we lease certain of our facilities and some of our equipment under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements that expire at various dates through 2028 . we also have one land lease that expires in 2091 . rent expense includes base contractual rent and variable costs such as building expenses , utilities , taxes , insurance and equipment rental . rent expense and sublease income for these leases for fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2014|2013|2012|
|rent expense|$ 111149|$ 118976|$ 105809|
|less : sublease income|1412|3057|2330|
|net rent expense|$ 109737|$ 115919|$ 103479|
we occupy three office buildings in san jose , california where our corporate headquarters are located . we reference these office buildings as the almaden tower and the east and west towers . in august 2014 , we exercised our option to purchase the east and west towers for a total purchase price of $ 143.2 million . upon purchase , our investment in the lease receivable of $ 126.8 million was credited against the total purchase price and we were no longer required to maintain a standby letter of credit as stipulated in the east and west towers lease agreement . we capitalized the east and west towers as property and equipment on our consolidated balance sheets at $ 144.1 million , the lesser of cost or fair value , which represented the total purchase price plus other direct costs associated with the purchase . see note 6 for discussion of our east and west towers purchase . the lease agreement for the almaden tower is effective through march 2017 . we are the investors in the lease receivable related to the almaden tower lease in the amount of $ 80.4 million , which is recorded as investment in lease receivable on our consolidated balance sheets . as of november 28 , 2014 , the carrying value of the lease receivable related to the almaden tower approximated fair value . under the agreement for the almaden tower , we have the option to purchase the building at any time during the lease term for $ 103.6 million . if we purchase the building , the investment in the lease receivable may be credited against the purchase price . the residual value guarantee under the almaden tower obligation is $ 89.4 million . the almaden tower lease is subject to standard covenants including certain financial ratios that are reported to the lessor quarterly . as of november 28 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . in the case of a default , the lessor may demand we purchase the building for an amount equal to the lease balance , or require that we remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the residual value guarantee amount less our investment in lease receivable . the almaden tower lease qualifies for operating lease accounting treatment and , as such , the building and the related obligation are not included in our consolidated balance sheets . see note 16 for discussion of our capital lease obligation . unconditional purchase obligations our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services entered into in the ordinary course of business. .
Question: for rent expense for fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , what was the largest rent expense in thousands?
Answer: | 118976.0 |
FINQA3737 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2006 , we had outstanding 53 mortgage loans that we assumed in connection with various acquisitions . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% ( 5.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except with respect to eight loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 114.4 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates , ranging from 3.6% ( 3.6 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum at of december 31 , 2006 . the fixed rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 7.06% ( 7.06 % ) and the variable rate debt bears interest at a weighted average annual rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 . the loans had a weighted average maturity of eight years as of december 31 , 2006 . the $ 114.4 variable mortgage debt was repaid in january 2007 . scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2006 , our indebtedness has the following maturities ( in thousands ) : .
|2007|$ 130206|
|2008|33117|
|2009|372725|
|2010|265915|
|2011|273761|
|thereafter|1261265|
|total maturities|2336989|
|less unamortized commission fees and discounts|-7936 ( 7936 )|
|senior notes payable and other debt|$ 2329053|
certain provisions of our long-term debt contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to , among other things : ( i ) incur debt ; ( ii ) make certain dividends , distributions and investments ; ( iii ) enter into certain transactions ; ( iv ) merge , consolidate or transfer certain assets ; and ( v ) sell assets . we and certain of our subsidiaries are also required to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% ( 150 % ) of this group 2019s unsecured debt . derivatives and hedging in the normal course of business , we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes . we limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives . for interest rate exposures , derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and to manage the cost of borrowing obligations . we currently have an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk ( the 201cswap 201d ) . we prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes . further , we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors . when viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge , we do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives. .
Question: what was the percent of the 2008 maturities as a part of the total maturities
Answer: | 0.01417 |
FINQA3738 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis operating activities cash flow from operations increased $ 8.8 million in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to income tax benefits received in 2004 , and increased recovery of deferred fuel costs . this increase was substantially offset by money pool activity . in 2003 , the domestic utility companies and system energy filed , with the irs , a change in tax accounting method notification for their respective calculations of cost of goods sold . the adjustment implemented a simplified method of allocation of overhead to the production of electricity , which is provided under the irs capitalization regulations . the cumulative adjustment placing these companies on the new methodology resulted in a $ 1.171 billion deduction for entergy arkansas on entergy's 2003 income tax return . there was no cash benefit from the method change in 2003 . in 2004 , entergy arkansas realized $ 173 million in cash tax benefit from the method change . this tax accounting method change is an issue across the utility industry and will likely be challenged by the irs on audit . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy arkansas has a net operating loss ( nol ) carryforward for tax purposes of $ 766.9 million , principally resulting from the change in tax accounting method related to cost of goods sold . if the tax accounting method change is sustained , entergy arkansas expects to utilize the nol carryforward through 2006 . cash flow from operations increased $ 80.1 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to income taxes paid of $ 2.2 million in 2003 compared to income taxes paid of $ 83.9 million in 2002 , and money pool activity . this increase was partially offset by decreased recovery of deferred fuel costs in 2003 . entergy arkansas' receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2004|2003|2002|2001|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 23561|( $ 69153 )|$ 4279|$ 23794|
money pool activity used $ 92.7 million of entergy arkansas' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 73.4 million in 2003 , and provided $ 19.5 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 68.1 million in net cash used in investing activities in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to a decrease in construction expenditures resulting from less transmission upgrade work requested by merchant generators in 2004 combined with lower spending on customer support projects in 2004 . the increase of $ 88.1 million in net cash used in investing activities in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily due to an increase in construction expenditures of $ 57.4 million and the maturity of $ 38.4 million of other temporary investments in the first quarter of 2002 . construction expenditures increased in 2003 primarily due to the following : 2022 a ferc ruling that shifted responsibility for transmission upgrade work performed for independent power producers to entergy arkansas ; and 2022 the ano 1 steam generator , reactor vessel head , and transformer replacement project . financing activities the decrease of $ 90.7 million in net cash used in financing activities in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to the net redemption of $ 2.4 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to $ 109.3 million in 2003 , partially offset by the payment of $ 16.2 million more in common stock dividends during the same period. .
Question: what is the increase in construction expenditures as a percentage of the increase in net cash used in investing activities in 2003?
Answer: | 0.65153 |
FINQA3739 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: .
|balance at january 1 2011|$ 23788|
|increases in current period tax positions|1525|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-3734 ( 3734 )|
|balance at december 31 2011|$ 21579|
|increases in current period tax positions|0|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-2059 ( 2059 )|
|balance at december 31 2012|$ 19520|
|increases in current period tax positions|0|
|decreases in current period tax positions|-5965 ( 5965 )|
|balance at december 31 2013|$ 13555|
included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. .
Question: what is the percentage of the discrete ax benefit as a part of the balance at december 312013
Answer: | 0.21977 |
FINQA3740 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .
||2012|2011|
|statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes|35% ( 35 % )|35% ( 35 % )|
|effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits|18|6|
|change in permanent reinvestment assertion|2014|5|
|adjustments to valuation allowances|21|14|
|tax law changes|2014|1|
|effective income tax rate on continuing operations|74% ( 74 % )|61% ( 61 % )|
the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .
Question: by how much did the effective income tax rate on continuing operations increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: | 0.13 |
FINQA3741 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the primary product offerings sold through our wholesale channels of distribution include menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and home furnishings . our collection brands 2014 women 2019s ralph lauren collection and black label and men 2019s purple label and black label 2014 are distributed worldwide through a limited number of premier fashion retailers . department stores are our major wholesale customers in north america . in latin america , our wholesale products are sold in department stores and specialty stores . in europe , our wholesale sales are a varying mix of sales to both department stores and specialty stores , depending on the country . we also distribute product to certain licensed stores operated by franchisees in europe and asia . in addition , our club monaco products are distributed through select department stores and specialty stores in europe . in japan , our wholesale products are distributed primarily through shop-within-shops at premier and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is weighted to women 2019s and men's blue label . in the greater china and southeast asia region , our wholesale products are sold at mid and top-tier department stores in china , thailand , and the philippines , and the mix of business is primarily weighted to men 2019s and women 2019s blue label . we sell the majority of our excess and out-of-season products through secondary distribution channels worldwide , including our retail factory stores . worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 30 , 2013 : location number of .
|location|number ofdoors|
|the americas|6043|
|europe|4504|
|asia|78|
|total|10625|
in addition , chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1200 doors as of march 30 , we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2013 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of our total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc . ( "macy's" ) representing approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our total wholesale revenues . our products are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in boston , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , and stockholm . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . shop- within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items , and flooring . as of march 30 , 2013 , we had approximately 20000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 7400 square feet . we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers . basic stock replenishment program . basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , selected accessories , and home products can be ordered by our wholesale customers at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs . we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt . our retail segment as of march 30 , 2013 , our retail segment consisted of 388 directly-operated freestanding stores worldwide , totaling approximately 3 million square feet , 494 concession-based shop-within-shops , and seven e-commerce websites . the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is one of our primary long-term strategic goals. .
Question: what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 30 , 2013 where in the europe geography?
Answer: | 0.42391 |
FINQA3742 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: blackrock information related to our equity investment in blackrock follows: .
||2009|2008|
|business segment earnings ( in millions ) ( a )|$ 207|$ 207|
|pnc 2019s share of blackrock earnings ( b )|23% ( 23 % )|33% ( 33 % )|
|carrying value of pnc 2019s investment in blackrock ( in billions ) ( b )|$ 5.8|$ 4.2|
carrying value of pnc 2019s investment in blackrock ( in billions ) ( b ) $ 5.8 $ 4.2 ( a ) includes pnc 2019s share of blackrock 2019s reported gaap earnings and additional income taxes on those earnings incurred by pnc . ( b ) at december 31 . blackrock/barclays global investors transaction on december 1 , 2009 , blackrock acquired bgi from barclays bank plc in exchange for approximately $ 6.65 billion in cash and 37566771 shares of blackrock common and participating preferred stock . in connection with the bgi transaction , blackrock entered into amendments to stockholder agreements with pnc and its other major shareholder . these amendments , which changed certain shareholder rights , including composition of the blackrock board of directors and share transfer restrictions , became effective upon closing of the bgi transaction . also in connection with the bgi transaction , blackrock entered into a stock purchase agreement with pnc in which we purchased 3556188 shares of blackrock 2019s series d preferred stock at a price of $ 140.60 per share , or $ 500 million , to partially finance the transaction . on january 31 , 2010 , the series d preferred stock was converted to series b preferred stock . upon closing of the bgi transaction , the carrying value of our investment in blackrock increased significantly , reflecting our portion of the increase in blackrock 2019s equity resulting from the value of blackrock shares issued in connection with their acquisition of bgi . pnc recognized this increase in value as a $ 1.076 billion pretax gain in the fourth quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2009 , our percentage ownership of blackrock common stock was approximately 35% ( 35 % ) . blackrock ltip programs and exchange agreements pnc 2019s noninterest income included pretax gains of $ 98 million in 2009 and $ 243 million in 2008 related to our blackrock ltip shares obligation . these gains represented the mark-to-market adjustment related to our remaining blackrock ltip common shares obligation and resulted from the decrease in the market value of blackrock common shares in those periods . as previously reported , pnc entered into an exchange agreement with blackrock on december 26 , 2008 . the transactions that resulted from this agreement restructured pnc 2019s ownership of blackrock equity without altering , to any meaningful extent , pnc 2019s economic interest in blackrock . pnc continues to be subject to the limitations on its voting rights in its existing agreements with blackrock . also on december 26 , 2008 , blackrock entered into an exchange agreement with merrill lynch in anticipation of the consummation of the merger of bank of america corporation and merrill lynch that occurred on january 1 , 2009 . the pnc and merrill lynch exchange agreements restructured pnc 2019s and merrill lynch 2019s respective ownership of blackrock common and preferred equity . the exchange contemplated by these agreements was completed on february 27 , 2009 . on that date , pnc 2019s obligation to deliver blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s new series c preferred stock . pnc acquired 2.9 million shares of series c preferred stock from blackrock in exchange for common shares on that same date . pnc accounts for these preferred shares at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock as we aligned the fair value marks on this asset and liability . the fair value of the blackrock series c preferred stock is included on our consolidated balance sheet in other assets . additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock is included in note 8 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . pnc accounts for its remaining investment in blackrock under the equity method of accounting , with its share of blackrock 2019s earnings reduced primarily due to the exchange of blackrock common stock for blackrock series c preferred stock . the series c preferred stock is not taken into consideration in determining pnc 2019s share of blackrock earnings under the equity method . pnc 2019s percentage ownership of blackrock common stock increased as a result of the substantial exchange of merrill lynch 2019s blackrock common stock for blackrock preferred stock . as a result of the blackrock preferred stock held by merrill lynch and the new blackrock preferred stock issued to merrill lynch and pnc under the exchange agreements , pnc 2019s share of blackrock common stock is higher than its overall share of blackrock 2019s equity and earnings . the transactions related to the exchange agreements do not affect our right to receive dividends declared by blackrock. .
Question: the recognized increase in value as a pretax gain in the fourth quarter of 2009 equaled what percent of the total carrying value of pnc 2019s investment in blackrock?
Answer: | 0.2152 |
FINQA3743 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : .
|2016|$ 976|
|2017|2014|
|2018|875|
|2019|1100|
|2020|414|
|thereafter|9763|
|total|$ 13128|
credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: in 2015 what was the ratio of the notes issued maturing in 2025 to 2045
Answer: | 1.13333 |
FINQA3744 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared .
||high|low|dividends declared|
|period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004|$ 14.38|$ 12.50|$ 0.1113|
|quarter ended december 31 2004|14.55|12.60|0.2275|
|quarter ended march 31 2005|14.30|12.55|0.2275|
|quarter ended june 30 2005|14.75|12.19|0.2275|
|quarter ended september 30 2005|16.71|14.32|0.2275|
|quarter ended december 31 2005|15.90|13.00|0.2275|
on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: using the high bid price what was the percentage difference between the quarter ended december 31 , 2004 and the quarter ended march 312005?
Answer: | -0.01718 |
FINQA3745 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: arconic and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements ( dollars in millions , except per-share amounts ) a . summary of significant accounting policies basis of presentation . the consolidated financial statements of arconic inc . and subsidiaries ( 201carconic 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) and require management to make certain judgments , estimates , and assumptions . these may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements . they also may affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period . actual results could differ from those estimates upon subsequent resolution of identified matters . certain amounts in previously issued financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation ( see below and note c ) on january 1 , 2018 , arconic adopted new guidance issued by the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) related to the following : presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost that required a reclassification of costs within the statement of consolidated operations ; presentation of certain cash receipts and cash payments within the statement of consolidated cash flows that required a reclassification of amounts between operating and either financing or investing activities ; the classification of restricted cash within the statement of consolidated cash flows ; and the reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance sheet of stranded tax effects resulting from the tax cuts and jobs act enacted on december 22 , 2017 . see recently adopted accounting guidance below for further details . also on january 1 , 2018 , the company changed its primary measure of segment performance from adjusted earnings before interest , tax , depreciation and amortization ( 201cadjusted ebitda 201d ) to segment operating profit , which more closely aligns segment performance with operating income as presented in the statement of consolidated operations . see note c for further details . the separation of alcoa inc . into two standalone , publicly-traded companies , arconic inc . ( the new name for alcoa inc. ) and alcoa corporation , became effective on november 1 , 2016 ( the 201cseparation transaction 201d ) . the financial results of alcoa corporation for 2016 have been retrospectively reflected in the statement of consolidated operations as discontinued operations and , as such , have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for 2016 . the cash flows and comprehensive income related to alcoa corporation have not been segregated and are included in the statement of consolidated cash flows and statement of consolidated comprehensive income ( loss ) , respectively , for 2016 . see note v for additional information related to the separation transaction and discontinued operations . principles of consolidation . the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of arconic and companies in which arconic has a controlling interest . intercompany transactions have been eliminated . investments in affiliates in which arconic cannot exercise significant influence are accounted for on the cost method . management also evaluates whether an arconic entity or interest is a variable interest entity and whether arconic is the primary beneficiary . consolidation is required if both of these criteria are met . arconic does not have any variable interest entities requiring consolidation . cash equivalents . cash equivalents are highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less . inventory valuation . inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value , with cost for approximately half of u.s . inventories determined under the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method . the cost of other inventories is determined under a combination of the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) and average-cost methods . properties , plants , and equipment . properties , plants , and equipment are recorded at cost . depreciation is recorded principally on the straight-line method at rates based on the estimated useful lives of the assets . the following table details the weighted-average useful lives of structures and machinery and equipment by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
||structures|machinery and equipment|
|engineered products and solutions|29|17|
|global rolled products|31|21|
|transportation and construction solutions|27|18|
gains or losses from the sale of asset groups are generally recorded in restructuring and other charges while the sale of individual assets are recorded in other expense ( income ) , net ( see policy below for assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations ) . repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . interest related to the construction of qualifying assets is capitalized as part of the construction costs. .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of structures and machinery/equipment in the engineered products and solutions segment , in years?
Answer: | 12.0 |
FINQA3746 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets .
|increase ( decrease ) in expense|change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase|change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease|
|u.s . plans|$ -13 ( 13 )|$ 13|
|u.k . plans|-32 ( 32 )|32|
|the netherlands plan|-5 ( 5 )|5|
|canada plans|-2 ( 2 )|2|
estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 381 million in 2010 as compared with $ 437 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , client lists , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2009 were $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , compared to $ 5.6 billion and $ 779 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2008 . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . beginning in 2009 , we also test trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) that were acquired in conjunction with the benfield merger for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2009 or 2008 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of .
Question: what is the increase in the value of goodwill balances during 2008 and 2009?
Answer: | 0.08929 |
FINQA3747 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|399165|$ 0.00|3995600|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )|2014|2014|2014|
|total|399165|$ 0.00|3995600|
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?
Answer: | 0.90917 |
FINQA3748 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: energy ; disruptions or ineffi ciencies in the supply chain ; eff ectiveness of restructuring and cost savings initia- tives ; volatility in the market value of derivatives used to manage price risk for certain commodities ; benefi t plan expenses due to changes in plan asset values and discount rates used to determine plan liabilities ; failure or breach of our information technology systems ; for- eign economic conditions , including currency rate fl uc- tuations ; and political unrest in foreign markets and economic uncertainty due to terrorism or war . you should also consider the risk factors that we identify in item 1a of our 2015 form 10-k , which could also aff ect our future results . we undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to refl ect events or circum- stances aft er the date of those statements or to refl ect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk we are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates and commod- ity and equity prices . changes in these factors could cause fl uctuations in our earnings and cash fl ows . in the normal course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into vari- ous hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . th e counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative fi nancial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 52 of this report . value at risk th e estimates in the table below are intended to mea- sure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . th e models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confi - dence level . th e var calculation used historical interest and for- eign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . th e market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . th e calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally off set by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . th e positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; com- modity swaps , futures and options ; and equity instru- ments . th e calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are off set by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . th e table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 31 , 2015 , and may 25 , 2014 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 31 , 2015. .
|in millions|fair value impact may 31 2015|fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2015|fair value impact may 25 2014|
|interest rate instruments|$ 25.1|$ 23.7|$ 32.7|
|foreign currency instruments|17.9|8.8|7.2|
|commodity instruments|3.7|3.7|3.0|
|equity instruments|1.2|1.2|1.1|
36 general mills .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of foreign currency instruments from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: | 10.7 |
FINQA3749 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 . derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2014|2013|
|interest rate|$ 33725|$ 25782|
|credit derivatives|1838|1516|
|foreign exchange|21253|16790|
|equity|8177|12227|
|commodity|13982|9444|
|total net of cash collateral|78975|65759|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables|-19604 ( 19604 )|-14435 ( 14435 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 59371|$ 51324|
derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral . the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2013?\\n
Answer: | 0.21951 |
FINQA3750 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: .
|( in millions )|years ended december 31 , 2014|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|
|weighted-average shares - basic|170.6|156.6|145.1|
|effect of dilutive securities|2.2|2.1|0.7|
|weighted-average shares - diluted|172.8|158.7|145.8|
there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the "debt pool" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the average , in millions , of weighted-average diluted shares from 2012-2014?
Answer: | 159.1 |
FINQA3751 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: uncertain tax positions the following is a reconciliation of the company's beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions ( in millions ) : .
||2015|2014|
|balance at january 1|$ 191|$ 164|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|31|31|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|53|10|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-18 ( 18 )|-6 ( 6 )|
|settlements|-32 ( 32 )|2014|
|business combinations|2014|5|
|lapse of statute of limitations|-5 ( 5 )|-11 ( 11 )|
|foreign currency translation|-2 ( 2 )|-2 ( 2 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 218|$ 191|
the company's liability for uncertain tax positions as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , includes $ 180 million , $ 154 million , and $ 141 million , respectively , related to amounts that would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . it is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of income or consolidated balance sheets . these changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits . at this time , an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes within the twelve months cannot be made . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in its provision for income taxes . the company accrued potential interest and penalties of $ 2 million , $ 4 million , and $ 2 million in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded a liability for interest and penalties of $ 33 million , $ 31 million , and $ 27 million as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in their respective jurisdictions . the company has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2005 . the company has concluded income tax examinations in its primary non-u.s . jurisdictions through 2005 . 9 . shareholders' equity distributable reserves as a u.k . incorporated company , the company is required under u.k . law to have available "distributable reserves" to make share repurchases or pay dividends to shareholders . distributable reserves may be created through the earnings of the u.k . parent company and , amongst other methods , through a reduction in share capital approved by the english companies court . distributable reserves are not linked to a u.s . gaap reported amount ( e.g. , retained earnings ) . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the company had distributable reserves in excess of $ 2.1 billion and $ 4.0 billion , respectively . ordinary shares in april 2012 , the company's board of directors authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $ 5.0 billion of class a ordinary shares may be repurchased ( "2012 share repurchase program" ) . in november 2014 , the company's board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program in addition to the existing program ( "2014 share repurchase program" and , together , the "repurchase programs" ) . under each program , shares may be repurchased through the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , based on prevailing market conditions , funded from available capital . during 2015 , the company repurchased 16.0 million shares at an average price per share of $ 97.04 for a total cost of $ 1.6 billion under the repurchase programs . during 2014 , the company repurchased 25.8 million shares at an average price per share of $ 87.18 for a total cost of $ 2.3 billion under the 2012 share repurchase plan . in august 2015 , the $ 5 billion of class a ordinary shares authorized under the 2012 share repurchase program was exhausted . at december 31 , 2015 , the remaining authorized amount for share repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program is $ 4.1 billion . under the repurchase programs , the company repurchased a total of 78.1 million shares for an aggregate cost of $ 5.9 billion. .
Question: what is the net amount of uncertain tax positions for 2015 , ( in millions )
Answer: | 27.0 |
FINQA3752 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: an institution rated single-a by the credit rating agencies . given the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments , it can be a challenge to determine their fair values . see note 7 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . various pnc business units manage our equity and other investment activities . our businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the approved policy limits and associated guidelines . a summary of our equity investments follows : table 48 : equity investments summary in millions december 31 december 31 .
|in millions|december 312015|december 312014|
|blackrock|$ 6626|$ 6265|
|tax credit investments|2254|2616|
|private equity|1441|1615|
|visa|31|77|
|other|235|155|
|total|$ 10587|$ 10728|
blackrock pnc owned approximately 35 million common stock equivalent shares of blackrock equity at december 31 , 2015 , accounted for under the equity method . the primary risk measurement , similar to other equity investments , is economic capital . the business segments review section of this item 7 includes additional information about blackrock . tax credit investments included in our equity investments are direct tax credit investments and equity investments held by consolidated partnerships which totaled $ 2.3 billion at december 31 , 2015 and $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . these equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 669 million and $ 717 million at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . these unfunded commitments are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report has further information on tax credit investments . private equity the private equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry , stage and type of investment . private equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2015 and $ 1.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.1 billion was invested directly in a variety of companies and $ .3 billion was invested indirectly through various private equity funds . included in direct investments are investment activities of two private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes . the noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $ 170 million as of december 31 , 2015 . the interests held in indirect private equity funds are not redeemable , but pnc may receive distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments . see item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and of private funds covered by the volcker rule . in 2015 , pnc invested with six other banks in early warning services ( ews ) , a provider of fraud prevention and risk management solutions . ews then acquired clearxchange , a network through which customers send and receive person-to- person payments . integrating these businesses will enable us to , among other things , create a secure , real-time payments network . our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 126 million at december 31 , 2015 compared with $ 140 million at december 31 , 2014 . see note 7 fair value , note 20 legal proceedings and note 21 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information regarding the october 2007 visa restructuring , our involvement with judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks , the status of pending interchange litigation , the sales of portions of our visa class b common shares and the related swap agreements with the purchasers . during 2015 , we sold 2.0 million visa class b common shares , in addition to the 16.5 million shares sold in previous years . we have entered into swap agreements with the purchasers of the shares as part of these sales . see note 7 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . at december 31 , 2015 , our investment in visa class b common shares totaled approximately 4.9 million shares and had a carrying value of $ 31 million . based on the december 31 , 2015 closing price of $ 77.55 for the visa class a common shares , the fair value of our total investment was approximately $ 622 million at the current conversion rate . the visa class b common shares that we own are transferable only under limited circumstances until they can be converted into shares of the publicly traded class of stock , which cannot happen until the settlement of all of the specified litigation . 90 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: for the blackrock common stock equivalent shares at december 31 , 2015 , accounted for under the equity method , what was the cost per share in dollars?
Answer: | 189.31429 |
FINQA3753 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 2438.4|
|regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate|55.5|
|retail electric price|42.8|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|17.2|
|volume/weather|-12.4 ( 12.4 )|
|other|19.0|
|2017 net revenue|$ 2560.5|
the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .
Question: how much higher was net revenue in 2017 than in 2016 ? ( in millions )
Answer: | 122.1 |
FINQA3754 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we prepare estimates of research and development costs for projects in clinical development , which include direct costs and allocations of certain costs such as indirect labor , non-cash compensation expense , and manufacturing and other costs related to activities that benefit multiple projects , and , under our collaboration with bayer healthcare , the portion of bayer healthcare 2019s vegf trap-eye development expenses that we are obligated to reimburse . our estimates of research and development costs for clinical development programs are shown below : project costs year ended december 31 , increase ( decrease ) ( in millions ) 2009 2008 .
|project costs ( in millions )|project costs 2009|2008|( decrease )|
|arcalyst ae|$ 67.7|$ 39.2|$ 28.5|
|vegf trap-eye|109.8|82.7|27.1|
|aflibercept|23.3|32.1|-8.8 ( 8.8 )|
|regn88|36.9|21.4|15.5|
|other antibody candidates in clinical development|74.4|27.4|47.0|
|other research programs & unallocated costs|86.7|72.1|14.6|
|total research and development expenses|$ 398.8|$ 274.9|$ 123.9|
for the reasons described above in results of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , under the caption 201cresearch and development expenses 201d , and due to the variability in the costs necessary to develop a pharmaceutical product and the uncertainties related to future indications to be studied , the estimated cost and scope of the projects , and our ultimate ability to obtain governmental approval for commercialization , accurate and meaningful estimates of the total cost to bring our product candidates to market are not available . similarly , we are currently unable to reasonably estimate if our product candidates will generate material product revenues and net cash inflows . in 2008 , we received fda approval for arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps , a group of rare , inherited auto-inflammatory diseases that affect a very small group of people . we currently do not expect to generate material product revenues and net cash inflows from the sale of arcalyst ae for the treatment of caps . selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 52.9 million in 2009 from $ 48.9 million in 2008 . in 2009 , we incurred ( i ) higher compensation expense , ( ii ) higher patent-related costs , ( iii ) higher facility-related costs due primarily to increases in administrative headcount , and ( iv ) higher patient assistance costs related to arcalyst ae . these increases were partly offset by ( i ) lower marketing costs related to arcalyst ae , ( ii ) a decrease in administrative recruitment costs , and ( iii ) lower professional fees related to various corporate matters . cost of goods sold during 2008 , we began recognizing revenue and cost of goods sold from net product sales of arcalyst ae . cost of goods sold in 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.7 million and $ 0.9 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . in 2009 and 2008 , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 4.5 million in 2009 from $ 18.2 million in 2008 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower balances of , cash and marketable securities . in addition , in 2009 and 2008 , deterioration in the credit quality of specific marketable securities in our investment portfolio subjected us to the risk of not being able to recover these securities 2019 carrying values . as a result , in 2009 and 2008 , we recognized charges of $ 0.1 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively , related to these securities , which we considered to be other than temporarily impaired . in 2009 and 2008 , these charges were either wholly or partly offset by realized gains of $ 0.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively , on sales of marketable securities during the year. .
Question: what was the percentage change in research and development costs related to arcalyst ae from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: | 0.72704 |
FINQA3755 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : accumulated foreign foreign minimum unrealized other currency currency pension gains on comprehensive translation hedges liability securities income .
||foreign currency translation|foreign currency hedges|minimum pension liability|unrealized gains on securities|accumulated other comprehensive income|
|beginning balance at january 1 2004|$ 179.7|$ -40.4 ( 40.4 )|$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )|$ 2013|$ 138.7|
|other comprehensive income ( loss )|145.5|-33.0 ( 33.0 )|-0.3 ( 0.3 )|2.4|114.6|
|balance at december 31 2004|$ 325.2|$ -73.4 ( 73.4 )|$ -0.9 ( 0.9 )|$ 2.4|$ 253.3|
accounting pronouncements 2013 in november 2004 , the no . 123 ( r ) requires all share-based payments to employees , fasb issued fasb staff position ( 2018 2018fsp 2019 2019 ) 109-1 , 2018 2018application including stock options , to be expensed based on their fair of fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , to values . the company has disclosed the effect on net earnings the tax deduction on qualified production activities and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair provided by the american jobs creation act of 2004 2019 2019 and value recognition provisions of sfas 123 . sfas 123 ( r ) fsp 109-2 , 2018 2018accounting and disclosure guidance for the contains three methodologies for adoption : 1 ) adopt foreign earnings repatriation provision within the american sfas 123 ( r ) on the effective date for interim periods jobs creation act of 2004 2019 2019 . fsp 109-1 states that a thereafter , 2 ) adopt sfas 123 ( r ) on the effective date for company 2019s deduction under the american jobs creation act interim periods thereafter and restate prior interim periods of 2004 ( the 2018 2018act 2019 2019 ) should be accounted for as a special included in the fiscal year of adoption under the provisions of deduction in accordance with sfas no . 109 and not as a tax sfas 123 , or 3 ) adopt sfas 123 ( r ) on the effective date for rate reduction . fsp 109-2 provides accounting and disclosure interim periods thereafter and restate all prior interim guidance for repatriation provisions included under the act . periods under the provisions of sfas 123 . the company has fsp 109-1 and fsp 109-2 were both effective upon issuance . not determined an adoption methodology . the company is in the adoption of these fsp 2019s did not have a material impact the process of assessing the impact that sfas 123 ( r ) will on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or have on its financial position , results of operations and cash cash flows in 2004 . flows . sfas 123 ( r ) is effective for the company on july 1 , in november 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 151 , 2005 . 2018 2018inventory costs 2019 2019 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense . sfas no . 151 requires that 3 . acquisitions fixed overhead production costs be applied to inventory at centerpulse ag and incentive capital ag 2018 2018normal capacity 2019 2019 and any excess fixed overhead production costs be charged to expense in the period in which they were on october 2 , 2003 ( the 2018 2018closing date 2019 2019 ) , the company incurred . sfas no . 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning closed its exchange offer for centerpulse , a global after june 15 , 2005 . the company does not expect sfas orthopaedic medical device company headquartered in no . 151 to have a material impact on its financial position , switzerland that services the reconstructive joint , spine and results of operations , or cash flows . dental implant markets . the company also closed its in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 153 , exchange offer for incentive , a company that , at the closing 2018 2018exchanges of nonmonetary assets 2019 2019 , which is effective for date , owned only cash and beneficially owned 18.3 percent of fiscal years beginning after june 15 , 2004 . the company does the issued centerpulse shares . the primary reason for not routinely engage in exchanges of nonmonetary assets ; as making the centerpulse and incentive exchange offers ( the such , sfas no . 153 is not expected to have a material impact 2018 2018exchange offers 2019 2019 ) was to create a global leader in the on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or design , development , manufacture and marketing of cash flows . orthopaedic reconstructive implants , including joint and in may 2004 , the fasb issued fsp 106-2 2018 2018accounting dental , spine implants , and trauma products . the strategic and disclosure requirements related to the medicare compatibility of the products and technologies of the prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of company and centerpulse is expected to provide significant 2003 2019 2019 , which is effective for the first interim or annual period earnings power and a strong platform from which it can beginning after june 15 , 2004 . the company does not expect actively pursue growth opportunities in the industry . for the to be eligible for the federal subsidy available pursuant to the company , centerpulse provides a unique platform for growth medicare prescription drug improvement and modernization and diversification in europe as well as in the spine and act of 2003 ; therefore , this staff position did not have a dental areas of the medical device industry . as a result of the material impact on the company 2019s results of operations , exchange offers , the company beneficially owned financial position or cash flow . 98.7 percent of the issued centerpulse shares ( including the in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( r ) , centerpulse shares owned by incentive ) and 99.9 percent of 2018 2018share-based payment 2019 2019 , which is a revision to sfas no . 123 , the issued incentive shares on the closing date . 2018 2018accounting for stock based compensation 2019 2019 . sfas .
Question: what was the percentage change in foreign currency translation in 2004?
Answer: | 0.80968 |
FINQA3756 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
||( in millions )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 208.3|
|base rates|10.6|
|volume/weather|8.3|
|2004 deferrals|7.5|
|price applied to unbilled electric sales|3.7|
|other|0.6|
|2004 net revenue|$ 239.0|
the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy new orleans , inc . in 2004?
Answer: | 0.14738 |
FINQA3757 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .
||12/31/05|12/31/06|12/31/07|12/31/08|12/31/09|12/31/10|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 101.76|$ 98.20|$ 78.76|$ 84.87|$ 110.57|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 115.79|$ 122.16|$ 76.96|$ 97.33|$ 111.99|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 109.82|$ 111.38|$ 87.52|$ 103.79|$ 131.59|
.
Question: what is the difference in total cumulative return on investment between united parcel service inc . and the dow jones transportation average for the five year period ending 12/31/10?
Answer: | 0.3159 |
FINQA3758 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : .
||2017|2016|2015|
|ifs|$ 4630|$ 4525|$ 3809|
|gfs|4138|4250|2361|
|corporate and other|355|466|426|
|total consolidated revenues|$ 9123|$ 9241|$ 6596|
integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the growth rate in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | 0.0232 |
FINQA3759 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 .
|cash flowsmillions|2012|2011|2010|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 6161|$ 5873|$ 4105|
|cash used in investing activities|-3633 ( 3633 )|-3119 ( 3119 )|-2488 ( 2488 )|
|cash used in financing activities|-2682 ( 2682 )|-2623 ( 2623 )|-2381 ( 2381 )|
|net change in cash and cashequivalents|$ -154 ( 154 )|$ 131|$ -764 ( 764 )|
operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .
Question: what was the average cost per locomotive for the 2012 early buyout?
Answer: | 454545.45455 |
FINQA3760 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k indicate by check mark whether the registrant ( 1 ) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 ( d ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports ) , and ( 2 ) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days . yes f06f no f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website , if any , every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of regulation s-t during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files ) . yes f06f no f06f indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of regulation s-k is not contained herein , and will not be contained , to the best of registrant 2019s knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part iii of this form 10-k or any amendment to this form 10-k . f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer , an accelerated filer , a non-accelerated filer , or a smaller reporting company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . large accelerated filer f06f accelerated filer f06f non-accelerated filer f0fe smaller reporting company f06f indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . yes f06f no f0fe as of june 30 , 2010 , the registrant was a privately held company , and therefore the market value of its common equity held by nonaffiliates was zero . as of february 16 , 2011 , the registrant had the following number of shares of common stock outstanding: .
|class a common stock|597213410|
|class b common stock|100000000|
|class c common stock|2462927|
|class p common stock|109786590|
explanatory note prior to the consummation of its february 2011 initial public offering , kinder morgan , inc. , was a delaware limited liability company named kinder morgan holdco llc whose unitholders became stockholders of kinder morgan , inc . upon the completion of its initial public offering . except as disclosed in the accompanying report , the consolidated financial statements and selected historical consolidated financial data and other historical financial information included in this report are those of kinder morgan holdco llc or its predecessor and their respective subsidiaries and do not give effect to the conversion . kinder morgan holdco llc 2019s wholly owned subsidiary , kinder morgan , inc. , who was not the registrant under our initial public offering , has changed its name to kinder morgan kansas , inc. .
Question: what is the total number of shares of common stock outstanding?
Answer: | 809462927.0 |
FINQA3761 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hlikk has four revolving credit facilities in support of operations . two of the credit facilities have no amounts drawn as of december 31 , 2013 with borrowing limits of approximately a55 billion , or $ 48 each , and individually have expiration dates of january 5 , 2015 and september 30 , 2014 . in december 2013 , hlikk entered into two new revolving credit facility agreements with two japanese banks in order to finance certain withholding taxes on mutual fund gains , that are subsequently credited when hlikk files its 2019 income tax returns . at december 31 , 2013 , hlikk had drawn the total borrowing limits of a55 billion , or $ 48 , and a520 billion , or $ 190 on these credit facilities . the a55 billion credit facility accrues interest at a variable rate based on the one month tokyo interbank offering rate ( tibor ) plus 3 bps , which as of december 31 , 2013 the interest rate was 15 bps , and the a520 billion credit facility accrues interest at a variable rate based on tibor plus 3 bps , or the actual cost of funding , which as of december 31 , 2013 the interest rate was 20 bps . both of the credit facilities expire on september 30 , 2014 . derivative commitments certain of the company 2019s derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial strength ratings of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement as set by nationally recognized statistical rating agencies . if the legal entity 2019s financial strength were to fall below certain ratings , the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement . the settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each agreement . if the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties , it could impact the legal entity 2019s ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the legal entity . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of december 31 , 2013 was $ 1.2 billion . of this $ 1.2 billion the legal entities have posted collateral of $ 1.4 billion in the normal course of business . in addition , the company has posted collateral of $ 44 associated with a customized gmwb derivative . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2013 , a downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p could require approximately an additional $ 12 to be posted as collateral . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2013 , a downgrade by either moody 2019s or s&p of two levels below the legal entities 2019 current financial strength ratings could require approximately an additional $ 33 of assets to be posted as collateral . these collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change , as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in contractual terms are negotiated . the nature of the collateral that we would post , if required , would be primarily in the form of u.s . treasury bills , u.s . treasury notes and government agency securities . as of december 31 , 2013 , the aggregate notional amount and fair value of derivative relationships that could be subject to immediate termination in the event of rating agency downgrades to either bbb+ or baa1 was $ 536 and $ ( 17 ) , respectively . insurance operations current and expected patterns of claim frequency and severity or surrenders may change from period to period but continue to be within historical norms and , therefore , the company 2019s insurance operations 2019 current liquidity position is considered to be sufficient to meet anticipated demands over the next twelve months , including any obligations related to the company 2019s restructuring activities . for a discussion and tabular presentation of the company 2019s current contractual obligations by period , refer to off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations within the capital resources and liquidity section of the md&a . the principal sources of operating funds are premiums , fees earned from assets under management and investment income , while investing cash flows originate from maturities and sales of invested assets . the primary uses of funds are to pay claims , claim adjustment expenses , commissions and other underwriting expenses , to purchase new investments and to make dividend payments to the hfsg holding company . the company 2019s insurance operations consist of property and casualty insurance products ( collectively referred to as 201cproperty & casualty operations 201d ) and life insurance and legacy annuity products ( collectively referred to as 201clife operations 201d ) . property & casualty operations property & casualty operations holds fixed maturity securities including a significant short-term investment position ( securities with maturities of one year or less at the time of purchase ) to meet liquidity needs . as of december 31 , 2013 , property & casualty operations 2019 fixed maturities , short-term investments , and cash are summarized as follows: .
|fixed maturities|$ 24704|
|short-term investments|984|
|cash|189|
|less : derivative collateral|241|
|total|$ 25636|
.
Question: what percent of total amount is held on fixed maturities?
Answer: | 0.96364 |
FINQA3762 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 942.1|
|base revenues|78.4|
|volume/weather|37.5|
|transmission revenue|9.2|
|purchased power capacity|-80.0 ( 80.0 )|
|other|3.9|
|2007 net revenue|$ 991.1|
the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2007?
Answer: | 49.0 |
FINQA3763 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as noted above , as a result of these sales , these regulated subsidiaries are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented . therefore , the amounts , statistics and tables presented in this section refer only to on-going operations , unless otherwise noted . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenue for 2012 and number of customers from continuing operations as well as an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2012 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total .
|new jersey|operating revenues ( in millions ) $ 639.0|% ( % ) of total 24.9% ( 24.9 % )|number of customers 639838|% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )|estimated population served ( in millions ) 2.5|% ( % ) of total 21.9% ( 21.9 % )|
|pennsylvania|557.7|21.7% ( 21.7 % )|658153|20.8% ( 20.8 % )|2.2|19.3% ( 19.3 % )|
|missouri|279.5|10.9% ( 10.9 % )|455730|14.4% ( 14.4 % )|1.5|13.2% ( 13.2 % )|
|illinois ( a )|256.4|10.0% ( 10.0 % )|308014|9.8% ( 9.8 % )|1.2|10.5% ( 10.5 % )|
|indiana|198.7|7.8% ( 7.8 % )|289068|9.2% ( 9.2 % )|1.2|10.5% ( 10.5 % )|
|california|193.3|7.5% ( 7.5 % )|174188|5.5% ( 5.5 % )|0.6|5.3% ( 5.3 % )|
|west virginia ( b )|125.0|4.9% ( 4.9 % )|172159|5.4% ( 5.4 % )|0.6|5.3% ( 5.3 % )|
|subtotal ( top seven states )|2249.6|87.7% ( 87.7 % )|2697150|85.4% ( 85.4 % )|9.8|86.0% ( 86.0 % )|
|other ( c )|314.8|12.3% ( 12.3 % )|461076|14.6% ( 14.6 % )|1.6|14.0% ( 14.0 % )|
|total regulated businesses|$ 2564.4|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|3158226|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|11.4|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|
( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois . ( b ) west virginia-american water company , which we refer to as wvawc , and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our operating subsidiaries in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee , and virginia . approximately 87.7% ( 87.7 % ) of operating revenue from our regulated businesses in 2012 was generated from approximately 2.7 million customers in our seven largest states , as measured by operating revenues . in fiscal year 2012 , no single customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our annual operating revenue . overview of networks , facilities and water supply our regulated businesses operate in approximately 1500 communities in 16 states in the united states . our primary operating assets include approximately 80 surface water treatment plants , 500 groundwater treatment plants , 1000 groundwater wells , 100 wastewater treatment facilities , 1200 treated water storage facilities , 1300 pumping stations , 90 dams and 46000 miles of mains and collection pipes . our regulated utilities own substantially all of the assets used by our regulated businesses . we generally own the land and physical assets used to store , extract and treat source water . typically , we do not own the water itself , which is held in public trust and is allocated to us through contracts and allocation rights granted by federal and state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law . maintaining the reliability of our networks is a key activity of our regulated businesses . we have ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which our regulated businesses operate . these programs consist of both rehabilitation of existing mains and replacement of mains that have reached the end of their useful service lives . our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water . drought , governmental restrictions , overuse of sources of water , the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water . we employ a variety of measures to ensure that we have adequate sources of water supply , both in the short-term and over the long-term . the geographic diversity of our service areas tends to mitigate some of the economic effect of weather extremes we .
Question: what is the approximate customer penetration for the total regulated businesses?
Answer: | 36003776400000.0 |
FINQA3764 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 7457|$ 7463|$ 6930|
|operating profit|1256|1069|973|
|operating margins|16.8% ( 16.8 % )|14.3% ( 14.3 % )|14.0% ( 14.0 % )|
|backlog at year-end|14700|14400|12800|
2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mfc in 2012?
Answer: | -0.0008 |
FINQA3765 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2017|2016|
|balance at january 1|$ 11|$ 11|
|balance at december 31|$ 11|$ 11|
all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .
Question: what was the percentage change in cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: | 1.66667 |
FINQA3766 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2018|2017|
|total net of cash collateral|$ 54213|$ 56523|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )|-15322 ( 15322 )|-16108 ( 16108 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 38891|$ 40415|
( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: what was the ratio of the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 .
Answer: | 0.95929 |
FINQA3767 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has approximately $ 64.6 million of non-united states tax net operating losses and $ 1.0 million of non-united states , non-expiring tax credits that are available for carryforward . net operating loss carryforwards , and the related carryforward periods , at december 31 , 2004 are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : gross net tax benefit carryforward operating loss amount period ends non-united states net operating loss****************** $ 35.3 $ 9.2 2005 20132014 non-united states net operating loss****************** 29.3 13.9 indefinite total ******************************************** $ 64.6 $ 23.1 a valuation allowance of $ 6.8 million has been provided for certain of the above carryforwards . this valuation allowance reduces the deferred tax asset of $ 23.1 million to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized . the company 2019s income tax returns in several locations are being examined by the local taxation authorities . management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related interest , if any , have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations . 17 . legal proceedings on june 29 , 2000 , edwards lifesciences filed a lawsuit against st . jude medical , inc . alleging infringement of several edwards lifesciences united states patents . this lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the central district of california , seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief . pursuant to the terms of a january 7 , 2005 settlement agreement , edwards lifesciences was paid $ 5.5 million by st . jude , edwards lifesciences granted st . jude a paid-up license for certain of its heart valve therapy products and the lawsuit was dismissed . the settlement will not have a material financial impact on the company . on august 18 , 2003 , edwards lifesciences filed a lawsuit against medtronic , inc. , medtronic ave , cook , inc . and w.l . gore & associates alleging infringement of a patent exclusively licensed to the company . the lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the northern district of california , seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief . on september 2 , 2003 , a second patent exclusively licensed to the company was added to the lawsuit . each of the defendants has answered and asserted various affirmative defenses and counterclaims . discovery is proceeding . in addition , edwards lifesciences is or may be a party to , or may be otherwise responsible for , pending or threatened lawsuits related primarily to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed , as applicable , by edwards lifesciences . such cases and claims raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities , including , but not limited to , the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim , the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought , and differences in applicable law . upon resolution of any pending legal matters , edwards lifesciences may incur charges in excess of presently established reserves . while any such charge could have a material adverse impact on edwards lifesciences 2019 net income or cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid , management does not believe that any such charge would have a material adverse effect on edwards lifesciences 2019 financial position , results of operations or liquidity . edwards lifesciences is also subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside of the united states . the operations of edwards lifesciences , like those of other medical device companies , involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws , primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes . while it is difficult to quantify the potential impact of compliance with environmental protection laws .
||gross net operating loss|tax benefit amount|carryforward period ends|
|non-united states net operating loss|$ 35.3|$ 9.2|2005 20132014|
|non-united states net operating loss|29.3|13.9|indefinite|
|total|$ 64.6|$ 23.1||
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2004 , the company has approximately $ 64.6 million of non-united states tax net operating losses and $ 1.0 million of non-united states , non-expiring tax credits that are available for carryforward . net operating loss carryforwards , and the related carryforward periods , at december 31 , 2004 are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : gross net tax benefit carryforward operating loss amount period ends non-united states net operating loss****************** $ 35.3 $ 9.2 2005 20132014 non-united states net operating loss****************** 29.3 13.9 indefinite total ******************************************** $ 64.6 $ 23.1 a valuation allowance of $ 6.8 million has been provided for certain of the above carryforwards . this valuation allowance reduces the deferred tax asset of $ 23.1 million to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized . the company 2019s income tax returns in several locations are being examined by the local taxation authorities . management believes that adequate amounts of tax and related interest , if any , have been provided for any adjustments that may result from these examinations . 17 . legal proceedings on june 29 , 2000 , edwards lifesciences filed a lawsuit against st . jude medical , inc . alleging infringement of several edwards lifesciences united states patents . this lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the central district of california , seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief . pursuant to the terms of a january 7 , 2005 settlement agreement , edwards lifesciences was paid $ 5.5 million by st . jude , edwards lifesciences granted st . jude a paid-up license for certain of its heart valve therapy products and the lawsuit was dismissed . the settlement will not have a material financial impact on the company . on august 18 , 2003 , edwards lifesciences filed a lawsuit against medtronic , inc. , medtronic ave , cook , inc . and w.l . gore & associates alleging infringement of a patent exclusively licensed to the company . the lawsuit was filed in the united states district court for the northern district of california , seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief . on september 2 , 2003 , a second patent exclusively licensed to the company was added to the lawsuit . each of the defendants has answered and asserted various affirmative defenses and counterclaims . discovery is proceeding . in addition , edwards lifesciences is or may be a party to , or may be otherwise responsible for , pending or threatened lawsuits related primarily to products and services currently or formerly manufactured or performed , as applicable , by edwards lifesciences . such cases and claims raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities , including , but not limited to , the facts and circumstances of each particular case or claim , the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought , and differences in applicable law . upon resolution of any pending legal matters , edwards lifesciences may incur charges in excess of presently established reserves . while any such charge could have a material adverse impact on edwards lifesciences 2019 net income or cash flows in the period in which it is recorded or paid , management does not believe that any such charge would have a material adverse effect on edwards lifesciences 2019 financial position , results of operations or liquidity . edwards lifesciences is also subject to various environmental laws and regulations both within and outside of the united states . the operations of edwards lifesciences , like those of other medical device companies , involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws , primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes . while it is difficult to quantify the potential impact of compliance with environmental protection laws .
Question: what is the percentage of the tax benefit compared to the gross net operating loss for the non-united states net operating loss from 2005 -2014?
Answer: | 0.26062 |
FINQA3768 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities by contractual maturity as of december 31 , 2007 , are as follows : amortized fair ( millions ) cost value .
|( millions )|amortizedcost|fairvalue|
|due in one year or less|$ 50|$ 50|
|due after one year through five years|52|52|
|due after five years through ten years|47|47|
|due after ten years|1|1|
|total fixed maturities|$ 150|$ 150|
expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties . for categorization purposes , aon considers any rating of baa or higher by moody 2019s investor services or equivalent rating agency to be investment grade . aon 2019s continuing operations have no fixed maturities with an unrealized loss at december 31 , 2007 . aon 2019s fixed-maturity portfolio is subject to interest rate , market and credit risks . with a carrying value of approximately $ 150 million at december 31 , 2007 , aon 2019s total fixed-maturity portfolio is approximately 96% ( 96 % ) investment grade based on market value . aon 2019s non publicly-traded fixed maturity portfolio had a carrying value of $ 9 million . valuations of these securities primarily reflect the fundamental analysis of the issuer and current market price of comparable securities . aon 2019s equity portfolio is comprised of a preferred stock not publicly traded . this portfolio is subject to interest rate , market , credit , illiquidity , concentration and operational performance risks . limited partnership securitization . in 2001 , aon sold the vast majority of its limited partnership ( lp ) portfolio , valued at $ 450 million , to peps i , a qspe . the common stock interest in peps i is held by a limited liability company which is owned by aon ( 49% ( 49 % ) ) and by a charitable trust , which is not controlled by aon , established for victims of september 11 ( 51% ( 51 % ) ) . approximately $ 171 million of investment grade fixed-maturity securities were sold by peps i to unaffiliated third parties . peps i then paid aon 2019s insurance underwriting subsidiaries the $ 171 million in cash and issued to them an additional $ 279 million in fixed-maturity and preferred stock securities . as part of this transaction , aon is required to purchase from peps i additional fixed-maturity securities in an amount equal to the unfunded limited partnership commitments , as they are requested . aon funded $ 2 million of commitments in both 2007 and 2006 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these unfunded commitments amounted to $ 44 million . these commitments have specific expiration dates and the general partners may decide not to draw on these commitments . the carrying value of the peps i preferred stock was $ 168 million and $ 210 million at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . prior to 2007 , income distributions received from peps i were limited to interest payments on various peps i debt instruments . beginning in 2007 , peps i had redeemed or collateralized all of its debt , and as a result , began to pay preferred income distributions . in 2007 , the company received $ 61 million of income distributions from peps i , which are included in investment income . aon corporation .
Question: after selling the its lp portfolio to peps i , what is the value of lp is still owned by aon indirectly , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | -449.51 |
FINQA3769 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of the company 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 ae index , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 ae materials index , a group of 25 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector , ( 3 ) the s&p aerospace & defense select industry index , a group of 33 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201caerospace & defense 201d industry and ( 4 ) the s&p 500 ae industrials index , a group of 69 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cindustrials 201d market sector . the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends . historical prices prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , have been adjusted to reflect the value of the separation transaction . the graph , table and related information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into future filings under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . please note that the company intends to replace the s&p 500 ae materials index with the s&p aerospace & defense select industry index and the s&p 500 ae industrials index in subsequent stock performance graphs . we believe that the companies and industries represented in the s&p aerospace & defense select industry index and the s&p 500 ae industrials index better reflect the markets in which the company currently participates . all three indices are represented in the graph below . arconic inc . s&p 500 s&p materials s&p aerospace & defense s&p industrials cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 at december 31 , 2013 with dividends reinvested 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 period ending copyright a9 2019 standard & poor's , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
|as of december 31,|2013|2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|
|arconic inc .|$ 100|$ 149.83|$ 94.62|$ 80.22|$ 119.02|$ 74.47|
|s&p 500 aeindex|100|113.69|115.26|129.05|157.22|150.33|
|s&p 500 aematerials index|100|106.91|97.95|114.30|141.55|120.74|
|s&p aerospace & defense select industry index|100|111.43|117.49|139.70|197.50|181.56|
|s&p 500 aeindustrials index|100|109.83|107.04|127.23|153.99|133.53|
s&p 500 ae index 100 113.69 115.26 129.05 157.22 150.33 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 106.91 97.95 114.30 141.55 120.74 s&p aerospace & defense select industry index 100 111.43 117.49 139.70 197.50 181.56 s&p 500 ae industrials index 100 109.83 107.04 127.23 153.99 133.53 .
Question: considering one year of investment , what is the variation between the return provided by arconic inc . and the one provided by s&p 500 aeindustrials index?
Answer: | 0.4 |
FINQA3770 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about purchases by us during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to section 12 of the exchange act : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased ( 1 )|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announcedplans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 )|dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( 1 )|
|october 2013|0|$ 0|0|$ 781118739|
|november 2013|1191867|98.18|1191867|664123417|
|december 2013|802930|104.10|802930|580555202|
|total|1994797|$ 100.56|1994797||
( 1 ) as announced on may 1 , 2013 , in april 2013 , the board of directors replaced its previously approved share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion with a current authorization for repurchases of up to $ 1 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on june 30 , 2015 . under the current share repurchase authorization , shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , or in privately-negotiated transactions , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . as of february 1 , 2014 , the remaining authorized amount under the current authorization totaled approximately $ 580 million . ( 2 ) excludes 0.1 million shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans. .
Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the average price paid per share during november and december of 2013?
Answer: | 0.0603 |
FINQA3771 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 62 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 14 . taxes on income ( continued ) at december 31 , 2007 , ball corporation and its domestic subsidiaries had net operating loss carryforwards , expiring between 2020 and 2026 , of $ 64.6 million with a related tax benefit of $ 25.2 million . also at december 31 , 2007 , ball packaging europe and its subsidiaries had net operating loss carryforwards , with no expiration date , of $ 54.4 million with a related tax benefit of $ 14.6 million . ball packaging products canada corp . had a net operating loss carryforward , with no expiration date , of $ 15.8 million with a related tax benefit of $ 5.4 million . due to the uncertainty of ultimate realization , these european and canadian benefits have been offset by valuation allowances of $ 8.6 million and $ 5.4 million , respectively . upon realization , $ 5.3 million of the european valuation allowance will be recognized as a reduction in goodwill . at december 31 , 2007 , the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 5.8 million ; however , due to the uncertainty of realization of the entire credit , a valuation allowance of $ 3.8 million has been applied to reduce the carrying value to $ 2 million . effective january 1 , 2007 , ball adopted fin no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes . 201d as of the date of adoption , the accrual for uncertain tax position was $ 45.8 million , and the cumulative effect of the adoption was an increase in the reserve for uncertain tax positions of $ 2.1 million . the accrual includes an $ 11.4 million reduction in opening retained earnings and a $ 9.3 million reduction in goodwill . a reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits follows : ( $ in millions ) as adjusted for accounting change .
|( $ in millions )|as adjusted for accounting change|
|balance at january 1 2007|$ 45.8|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|3.9|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|7.6|
|reductions for settlements|-18.4 ( 18.4 )|
|effect of foreign currency exchange rates|2.2|
|balance at december 31 2007|$ 41.1|
|balance sheet classification:||
|income taxes payable|$ 4.2|
|deferred taxes and other liabilities|36.9|
|total|$ 41.1|
the amount of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2007 , that , if recognized , would reduce tax expense is $ 35.9 million . at this time there are no positions where the unrecognized tax benefit is expected to increase or decrease significantly within the next 12 months . u.s . federal and state income tax returns filed for the years 2000- 2006 are open for audit , with an effective settlement of the federal returns through 2004 . the income tax returns filed in europe for the years 2002 through 2006 are also open for audit . the company 2019s significant filings in europe are in germany , france , the netherlands , poland , serbia and the united kingdom . the company recognizes the accrual of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , ball recognized approximately $ 2.7 million of interest expense . the accrual for uncertain tax positions at december 31 , 2007 , includes approximately $ 5.1 million representing potential interest expense . no penalties have been accrued . the 2007 provision for income taxes included an $ 11.5 million accrual under fin no . 48 . the majority of this provision was related to the effective settlement during the third quarter of 2007 with the internal revenue service for interest deductions on incurred loans from a company-owned life insurance plan . the total accrual at december 31 , 2007 , for the effective settlement of the applicable prior years 2000-2004 under examination , and unaudited years 2005 through 2007 , was $ 18.4 million , including estimated interest . the settlement resulted in a majority of the interest deductions being sustained with prospective application that results in no significant impact to future earnings per share or cash flows. .
Question: what percentage of total unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2007 is comprised of deferred taxes and other liabilities?
Answer: | 0.89781 |
FINQA3772 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in 2008 , asp was flat compared to 2007 . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) in 2007 and decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2008 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 41% ( 41 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 24% ( 24 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2008 . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s 2008 net sales , were outside the u.s . in 2008 , the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . as the segment 2019s revenue transactions are largely denominated in local currencies , we are impacted by the weakening in the value of these local currencies against the u.s . dollar . a number of our more significant international markets , particularly in latin america , were impacted by this trend in late 2008 . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video distribution systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018home business 2019 2019 ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018network business 2019 2019 ) . in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 36% ( 36 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2008 and 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 . years ended december 31 percent change ( dollars in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 2009 20142008 2008 20142007 .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 2009|years ended december 31 2008|years ended december 31 2007|years ended december 31 2009 20142008|2008 20142007|
|segment net sales|$ 7963|$ 10086|$ 10014|( 21 ) % ( % )|1% ( 1 % )|
|operating earnings|558|918|709|( 39 ) % ( % )|29% ( 29 % )|
segment results 20142009 compared to 2008 in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales were $ 8.0 billion , a decrease of 21% ( 21 % ) compared to net sales of $ 10.1 billion in 2008 . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales reflects a 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business and a 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business . the 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , cdma , umts and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business was primarily driven by a 24% ( 24 % ) decrease in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting : ( i ) an 18% ( 18 % ) decrease in shipments of digital entertainment devices , primarily due to lower shipments to large cable and telecommunications operators in north america as a result of macroeconomic conditions , and ( ii ) a lower asp due to an unfavorable shift in product mix . the segment shipped 14.7 million digital entertainment devices in 2009 , compared to 18.0 million shipped in 2008 . on a geographic basis , the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales was driven by lower net sales in all regions . the decrease in net sales in north america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of cdma and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the decrease in net sales in emea was primarily due to lower net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products and higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in asia was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , umts and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in latin america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . net sales in north america accounted for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2009 , compared to approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2008. .
Question: what was the average segment net sales from 2007 to 2009 in millions
Answer: | 14033.0 |
FINQA3773 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: indemnification and repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make-whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . in connection with pooled settlements , we typically do not repurchase loans and the consummation of such transactions generally results in us no longer having indemnification and repurchase exposure with the investor in the transaction . for the first and second-lien mortgage balances of unresolved and settled claims contained in the tables below , a significant amount of these claims were associated with sold loans originated through correspondent lender and broker origination channels . in certain instances when indemnification or repurchase claims are settled for these types of sold loans , we have recourse back to the correspondent lenders , brokers and other third-parties ( e.g. , contract underwriting companies , closing agents , appraisers , etc. ) . depending on the underlying reason for the investor claim , we determine our ability to pursue recourse with these parties and file claims with them accordingly . our historical recourse recovery rate has been insignificant as our efforts have been impacted by the inability of such parties to reimburse us for their recourse obligations ( e.g. , their capital availability or whether they remain in business ) or factors that limit our ability to pursue recourse from these parties ( e.g. , contractual loss caps , statutes of limitations ) . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity , and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second- lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made , demand patterns observed to date and/or expected in the future , and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . to estimate the mortgage repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and warranties , we consider the following factors : ( i ) borrower performance in our historically sold portfolio ( both actual and estimated future defaults ) , ( ii ) the level of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims , ( iii ) estimated probable future repurchase claims , considering information about file requests , delinquent and liquidated loans , resolved and unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notices and our historical experience with claim rescissions , ( iv ) the potential ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase claims ( 201crescission rate 201d ) , and ( v ) the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral , make-whole settlement , or indemnification . see note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . the following tables present the unpaid principal balance of repurchase claims by vintage and total unresolved repurchase claims for the past five quarters . table 28 : analysis of quarterly residential mortgage repurchase claims by vintage dollars in millions december 31 september 30 june 30 march 31 december 31 .
|dollars in millions|december 31 2012|september 30 2012|june 30 2012|march 31 2012|december 312011|
|2004 & prior|$ 11|$ 15|$ 31|$ 10|$ 11|
|2005|8|10|19|12|13|
|2006|23|30|56|41|28|
|2007|45|137|182|100|90|
|2008|7|23|49|17|18|
|2008 & prior|94|215|337|180|160|
|2009 2013 2012|38|52|42|33|29|
|total|$ 132|$ 267|$ 379|$ 213|$ 189|
|fnma fhlmc and gnma % ( % )|94% ( 94 % )|87% ( 87 % )|86% ( 86 % )|88% ( 88 % )|91% ( 91 % )|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 .
Question: how much in combined repurchase claims , in millions , were recorded in the first quarter of 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008?
Answer: | 170.0 |
FINQA3774 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .
|( losses ) earnings ( in millions )|( losses ) earnings 2017|( losses ) earnings 2016|2015|
|currency translation adjustments|$ -5761 ( 5761 )|$ -6091 ( 6091 )|$ -6129 ( 6129 )|
|pension and other benefits|-2816 ( 2816 )|-3565 ( 3565 )|-3332 ( 3332 )|
|derivatives accounted for as hedges|42|97|59|
|total accumulated other comprehensive losses|$ -8535 ( 8535 )|$ -9559 ( 9559 )|$ -9402 ( 9402 )|
reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . contingencies : tobacco-related litigation legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us , and/or our subsidiaries , and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions . our indemnitees include distributors , licensees and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend , as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments , if any , that may be entered against them . pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . ( "altria" ) and pmi , pmi will indemnify altria and philip morris usa inc . ( "pm usa" ) , a u.s . tobacco subsidiary of altria , for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pmi or contract manufactured for pmi by pm usa , and pm usa will indemnify pmi for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pm usa , excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for pmi . it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries . an unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation . damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and , in certain cases in brazil , canada and nigeria , range into the billions of u.s . dollars . the variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions , together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims , demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome . much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages , and litigation is subject to uncertainty . however , as discussed below , we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation . we and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , after assessing the information available to it ( i ) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred. .
Question: what was the change in millions of total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | -157.0 |
FINQA3775 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 6 2014mergers and acquisitions eldertrust merger on february 5 , 2004 , the company consummated a merger transaction in an all cash transaction valued at $ 184 million ( the 201celdertrust transaction 201d ) . the eldertrust transaction adds nine assisted living facilities , one independent living facility , five skilled nursing facilities , two med- ical office buildings and a financial office building ( the 201celdertrust properties 201d ) to the company 2019s portfolio.the eldertrust properties are leased by the company to various operators under leases providing for aggregated , annual cash base rent of approxi- mately $ 16.2 million , subject to escalation as provided in the leases.the leases have remaining terms primarily ranging from four to 11 years.at the closing of the eldertrust transaction , the company also acquired all of the limited partnership units in eldertrust operating limited partnership ( 201cetop 201d ) directly from their owners at $ 12.50 per unit , excluding 31455 class c units in etop ( which will remain outstanding ) . etop owns directly or indirectly all of the eldertrust properties . the company funded the $ 101 million equity portion of the purchase price with cash on eldertrust 2019s balance sheet , a portion of the $ 85 million in proceeds from its december 2003 sale of ten facilities to kindred and draws on the company 2019s revolving credit facility ( the 201crevolving credit facility 201d ) under its second amended and restated security and guaranty agreement , dated as of april 17 , 2002 ( the 201c2002 credit agreement 201d ) .the company 2019s ownership of the eldertrust properties is subject to approximately $ 83 million of property level debt and other liabilities.at the close of the eldertrust transaction , eldertrust had approximately $ 33.5 million in unrestricted and restricted cash on hand . the acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method . the following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition . such estimates are subject to refinement as additional valuation information is received . operations from this merger will be reflected in the company 2019s consolidated financial state- ments for periods subsequent to the acquisition date of february 5 , 2004.the company is in the process of computing fair values , thus , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement. .
||( in millions )|
|real estate investments|$ 162|
|cash and cash equivalents|28|
|other assets|5|
|total assets acquired|$ 195|
|notes payable and other debt|83|
|accounts payable and other accrued liabilities|2|
|total liabilities assumed|85|
|net assets acquired|$ 110|
transaction with brookdale on january 29 , 2004 , the company entered into 14 definitive purchase agreements ( each , a 201cbrookdale purchase agreement 201d ) with certain affiliates of brookdale living communities , inc . ( 201cbrookdale 201d ) to purchase ( each such purchase , a 201cbrookdale acquisition 201d ) a total of 14 independent living or assisted living facilities ( each , a 201cbrookdale facility 201d ) for an aggregate purchase price of $ 115 million.affiliates of brookdale have agreed to lease and operate the brookdale facilities pursuant to one or more triple-net leases.all of the brookdale leases , which have an initial term of 15 years , will be guaranteed by brookdale and provide for aggregated annual base rent of approximately $ 10 million , escalating each year by the greater of ( i ) 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) or ( ii ) 75% ( 75 % ) of the consumer price index . the company expects to fund the brookdale acquisitions by assuming an aggregate of approximately $ 41 million of non- recourse property level debt on certain of the brookdale facilities , with the balance to be paid from cash on hand and/or draws on the revolving credit facility.the property level debt encumbers seven of the brookdale facilities . on january 29 , 2004 , the company completed the acquisitions of four brookdale facilities for an aggregate purchase price of $ 37 million.the company 2019s acquisition of the remaining ten brookdale facilities is expected to be completed shortly , subject to customary closing conditions . however , the consummation of each such brookdale acquisition is not conditioned upon the consummation of any other such brookdale acquisition and there can be no assurance which , if any , of such remaining brookdale acquisitions will be consummated or when they will be consummated . transactions with trans healthcare , inc . on november 4 , 2002 , the company , through its wholly owned subsidiary ventas realty , completed a $ 120.0 million transaction ( the 201cthi transaction 201d ) with trans healthcare , inc. , a privately owned long-term care and hospital company ( 201cthi 201d ) .the thi transaction was structured as a $ 53.0 million sale leaseback trans- action ( the 201cthi sale leaseback 201d ) and a $ 67.0 million loan ( the 201cthi loan 201d ) , comprised of a first mortgage loan ( the 201cthi senior loan 201d ) and a mezzanine loan ( the 201cthi mezzanine loan 201d ) . following a sale of the thi senior loan in december 2002 ( see below ) , the company 2019s investment in thi was $ 70.0 million . as part of the thi sale leasebackventas realty purchased 5 properties and is leasing them back to thi under a 201ctriple-net 201d master lease ( the 201cthi master lease 201d ) .the properties subject to the sale leaseback are four skilled nursing facilities and one con- tinuing care retirement community.the thi master lease , which has an initial term of ten years , provides for annual base rent of $ 5.9 million.the thi master lease provides that if thi meets specified revenue parameters , annual base rent will escalate each year by the greater of ( i ) three percent or ( ii ) 50% ( 50 % ) of the consumer price index . ventas , inc . page 37 annual report 2003 .
Question: what percentage of total assets acquired were real estate investments?
Answer: | 0.83077 |
FINQA3776 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: guarantees we adopted fasb interpretation no . 45 ( 201cfin 45 201d ) , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d at the beginning of our fiscal 2003 . see 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d for further information regarding fin 45 . the lease agreements for our three office buildings in san jose , california provide for residual value guarantees . these lease agreements were in place prior to december 31 , 2002 and are disclosed in note 14 . in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal . as part of our limited partnership interests in adobe ventures , we have provided a general indemnification to granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures , for certain events or occurrences while granite ventures is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity provided that granite ventures acts in good faith on behalf of the partnerships . we are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim , but believe the risk of having to make any payments under this general indemnification to be remote . we accrue for costs associated with future obligations which include costs for undetected bugs that are discovered only after the product is installed and used by customers . the accrual remaining at the end of fiscal 2003 primarily relates to new releases of our creative suites products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 . the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 .
|balance at november 29 2002|accruals|payments|balance at november 28 2003|
|$ 2014|$ 5554|$ -2369 ( 2369 )|$ 3185|
advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense . advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively . foreign currency and other hedging instruments statement of financial accounting standards no . 133 ( 201csfas no . 133 201d ) , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires us to recognize these as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value . as described in note 15 , gains and losses resulting from .
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2003 relative to 2002?
Answer: | -0.10112 |
FINQA3777 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: customary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : .
||2008|2007|2006|
|recurring tenant improvements|$ 36885|$ 45296|$ 41895|
|recurring leasing costs|28205|32238|32983|
|building improvements|9724|8402|8122|
|totals|$ 74814|$ 85936|$ 83000|
dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .
Question: what was the average dividend per share from 2006 to 2008 in dollars per share
Answer: | 1.91 |
FINQA3778 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 10 loan sales and securitizations loan sales we sell residential and commercial mortgage loans in loan securitization transactions sponsored by government national mortgage association ( gnma ) , fnma , and fhlmc and in certain instances to other third-party investors . gnma , fnma , and the fhlmc securitize our transferred loans into mortgage-backed securities for sale into the secondary market . generally , we do not retain any interest in the transferred loans other than mortgage servicing rights . refer to note 9 goodwill and other intangible assets for further discussion on our residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights assets . during 2009 , residential and commercial mortgage loans sold totaled $ 19.8 billion and $ 5.7 billion , respectively . during 2008 , commercial mortgage loans sold totaled $ 3.1 billion . there were no residential mortgage loans sales in 2008 as these activities were obtained through our acquisition of national city . our continuing involvement in these loan sales consists primarily of servicing and limited repurchase obligations for loan and servicer breaches in representations and warranties . generally , we hold a cleanup call repurchase option for loans sold with servicing retained to the other third-party investors . in certain circumstances as servicer , we advance principal and interest payments to the gses and other third-party investors and also may make collateral protection advances . our risk of loss in these servicing advances has historically been minimal . we maintain a liability for estimated losses on loans expected to be repurchased as a result of breaches in loan and servicer representations and warranties . we have also entered into recourse arrangements associated with commercial mortgage loans sold to fnma and fhlmc . refer to note 25 commitments and guarantees for further discussion on our repurchase liability and recourse arrangements . our maximum exposure to loss in our loan sale activities is limited to these repurchase and recourse obligations . in addition , for certain loans transferred in the gnma and fnma transactions , we hold an option to repurchase individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria . without prior authorization from these gses , this option gives pnc the ability to repurchase the delinquent loan at par . under gaap , once we have the unilateral ability to repurchase the delinquent loan , effective control over the loan has been regained and we are required to recognize the loan and a corresponding repurchase liability on the balance sheet regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan . at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , the balance of our repurchase option asset and liability totaled $ 577 million and $ 476 million , respectively . securitizations in securitizations , loans are typically transferred to a qualifying special purpose entity ( qspe ) that is demonstrably distinct from the transferor to transfer the risk from our consolidated balance sheet . a qspe is a bankruptcy-remote trust allowed to perform only certain passive activities . in addition , these entities are self-liquidating and in certain instances are structured as real estate mortgage investment conduits ( remics ) for tax purposes . the qspes are generally financed by issuing certificates for various levels of senior and subordinated tranches . qspes are exempt from consolidation provided certain conditions are met . our securitization activities were primarily obtained through our acquisition of national city . credit card receivables , automobile , and residential mortgage loans were securitized through qspes sponsored by ncb . these qspes were financed primarily through the issuance and sale of beneficial interests to independent third parties and were not consolidated on our balance sheet at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . however , see note 1 accounting policies regarding accounting guidance that impacts the accounting for these qspes effective january 1 , 2010 . qualitative and quantitative information about the securitization qspes and our retained interests in these transactions follow . the following summarizes the assets and liabilities of the securitization qspes associated with securitization transactions that were outstanding at december 31 , 2009. .
|in millions|december 31 2009 credit card|december 31 2009 mortgage|december 31 2009 credit card|mortgage|
|assets ( a )|$ 2368|$ 232|$ 2129|$ 319|
|liabilities|1622|232|1824|319|
( a ) represents period-end outstanding principal balances of loans transferred to the securitization qspes . credit card loans at december 31 , 2009 , the credit card securitization series 2005-1 , 2006-1 , 2007-1 , and 2008-3 were outstanding . during the fourth quarter of 2009 , the 2008-1 and 2008-2 credit card securitization series matured . our continuing involvement in the securitized credit card receivables consists primarily of servicing and our holding of certain retained interests . servicing fees earned approximate current market rates for servicing fees ; therefore , no servicing asset or liability is recognized . we hold a clean-up call repurchase option to the extent a securitization series extends past its scheduled note principal payoff date . to the extent this occurs , the clean-up call option is triggered when the principal balance of the asset- backed notes of any series reaches 5% ( 5 % ) of the initial principal balance of the asset-backed notes issued at the securitization .
Question: for how much more was the 2009 residential loan sold than the 2008 and 2009 commercial loans combined , in billions?
Answer: | 11.0 |
FINQA3779 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: business subsequent to the acquisition . the liabilities for these payments are classified as level 3 liabilities because the related fair value measurement , which is determined using an income approach , includes significant inputs not observable in the market . financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value our debt is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cost . based on market conditions as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the fair value of our credit agreement borrowings reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 1.7 billion and $ 2.0 billion , respectively . in addition , based on market conditions , the fair values of the outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility reasonably approximated the carrying values of $ 110 million and $ 100 million at december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the u.s . notes ( 2023 ) were approximately $ 574 million and $ 615 million , respectively , compared to a carrying value of $ 600 million at each date . as of december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 , the fair values of the euro notes ( 2024 ) were approximately $ 586 million and $ 658 million compared to carrying values of $ 573 million and $ 600 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the fair value of the euro notes ( 2026/28 ) approximated the carrying value of $ 1.1 billion . the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2018 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our u.s . notes ( 2023 ) is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair values of our euro notes ( 2024 ) and euro notes ( 2026/28 ) are determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in markets that are not active , and therefore are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 13 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2018 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .
|2019|$ 294269|
|2020|256172|
|2021|210632|
|2022|158763|
|2023|131518|
|thereafter|777165|
|future minimum lease payments|$ 1828519|
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 300 million , $ 247 million , and $ 212 million during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2018 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 76 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: what was the percentage change in rental expenses from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.21457 |
FINQA3780 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2007 net revenue|$ 486.9|
|attala costs|9.9|
|rider revenue|6.0|
|base revenue|5.1|
|reserve equalization|-2.4 ( 2.4 )|
|net wholesale revenue|-4.0 ( 4.0 )|
|other|-2.7 ( 2.7 )|
|2008 net revenue|$ 498.8|
the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .
Question: what percent of the change in net revenue was due to rider revenue?
Answer: | 0.5042 |
FINQA3781 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 46.6 million , $ 99.2 million and $ 130.6 million , respectively , and the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 61.5 million , $ 122.6 million and $ 200.1 million , respectively . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2016 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share .
||restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )|weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015|2698|$ 47.59|
|units granted|1099|$ 51.59|
|restrictions lapsed|-905 ( 905 )|$ 44.30|
|forfeited|-202 ( 202 )|$ 50.34|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2016|2690|$ 50.11|
as of october 29 , 2016 , there was $ 112.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.4 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ 62.8 million , $ 65.6 million and $ 57.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchases the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 6.2 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2016 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 147.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.4 billion under this program . an additional $ 792.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . as a result of the company's planned acquisition of linear technology corporation , see note 6 , acquisitions , of these notes to consolidated financial statements , the company temporarily suspended the common stock repurchase plan in the third quarter of 2016 . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance. .
Question: what is the total value of the forfeited shares?
Answer: | 10168.68 |
FINQA3782 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . segment information ( continued ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 2 ) excluded from net sales were intra-company sales between segments of approximately two percent of net sales in each of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 2143 million , $ 1984 million and $ 1993 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5793 million , $ 5394 million and $ 5618 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2012 was an impairment charge for other intangible assets as follows : other specialty products 2013 $ 42 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2011 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 44 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; decorative architectural products 2013 $ 75 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 374 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 697 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) the charge for litigation settlement , net in 2012 primarily relates to a business in the installation and other services segment and in 2011 relates to business units in the cabinets and related products and the other specialty products segments . ( 9 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 2795 million and $ 567 million , $ 2964 million and $ 565 million , and $ 3684 million and $ 617 million at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 10 ) segment assets for 2012 and 2011 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations in the respective years . p . severance costs as part of the company 2019s continuing review of its operations , actions were taken during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 to respond to market conditions . the company recorded charges related to severance and early retirement programs of $ 36 million , $ 17 million and $ 14 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such charges are principally reflected in the statement of operations in selling , general and administrative expenses and were paid when incurred . q . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|2010|
|income from cash and cash investments|$ 6|$ 8|$ 6|
|other interest income|1|1|1|
|income from financial investments net ( note e )|24|73|9|
|other items net|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-9 ( 9 )|
|total other net|$ 27|$ 77|$ 7|
other items , net , included realized foreign currency transaction losses of $ 2 million , $ 5 million and $ 2 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , as well as other miscellaneous items. .
Question: what was the difference in income from financial investments net in millions from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | 64.0 |
FINQA3783 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . in 2007 , our refined products sales volumes totaled 21.6 billion gallons , or 1.410 mmbpd . the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 86.53 per barrel for 2007 . the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2007 2006 2005 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2007|2006|2005|
|gasoline|791|804|836|
|distillates|377|375|385|
|propane|23|23|22|
|feedstocks and special products|103|106|96|
|heavy fuel oil|29|26|29|
|asphalt|87|91|87|
|total ( a )|1410|1425|1455|
|average sales price ( dollars per barrel )|$ 86.53|$ 77.76|$ 66.42|
total ( a ) 1410 1425 1455 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 86.53 $ 77.76 $ 66.42 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd and 77 mbpd in 2006 and 2005 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 69 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . we sold 49 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis . half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers . propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry . base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide . we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . our customer base includes approximately 750 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we have blended ethanol with gasoline for over 15 years and increased our blending program in 2007 , in part due to renewable fuel mandates . we blended 41 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2007 and 35 mbpd in both 2006 and 2005 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states . we also sell biodiesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . as of december 31 , 2007 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4400 marathon branded-retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois . branded retail outlets are also located in georgia , florida , minnesota , wisconsin , north carolina , tennessee , west virginia , virginia , south carolina , alabama , pennsylvania , and texas . sales to marathon-brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 16 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2007 . speedway superamerica llc ( 201cssa 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiary , sells gasoline and diesel fuel primarily through retail outlets that we operate . sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 201cspeedway 201d and 201csuperamerica . 201d ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.796 billion in 2007 , compared with $ 2.706 billion in 2006 . profit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel . ssa also operates 59 valvoline instant oil change retail outlets located in michigan and northwest ohio . pilot travel centers llc ( 201cptc 201d ) , our joint venture with pilot corporation ( 201cpilot 201d ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with 286 locations in 37 states and canada at december 31 , 2007 . the travel centers offer diesel fuel , gasoline and a variety of other services , including on-premises brand-name restaurants at many locations . pilot and marathon each own a 50 percent interest in ptc. .
Question: what was the decline in matching buy/sell volumes in mbpd between 2006 and 2005?
Answer: | -53.0 |
FINQA3784 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business our distribution centers , which we refer to as operating companies , distribute nationally-branded merchandise , as well as products packaged under our private brands . products packaged under our private brands have been manufactured for sysco according to specifi cations that have been developed by our quality assurance team . in addition , our quality assurance team certifi es the manufacturing and processing plants where these products are packaged , enforces our quality control standards and identifi es supply sources that satisfy our requirements . we believe that prompt and accurate delivery of orders , competitive pricing , close contact with customers and the ability to provide a full array of products and services to assist customers in their foodservice operations are of primary importance in the marketing and distribution of foodservice products to our customers . our operating companies offer daily delivery to certain customer locations and have the capability of delivering special orders on short notice . through our approximately 12800 sales and marketing representatives and support staff of sysco and our operating companies , we stay informed of the needs of our customers and acquaint them with new products and services . our operating companies also provide ancillary services relating to foodservice distribution , such as providing customers with product usage reports and other data , menu-planning advice , food safety training and assistance in inventory control , as well as access to various third party services designed to add value to our customers 2019 businesses . no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of sysco 2019s total sales for the fi scal year ended june 28 , 2014 . we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fi scal years were as follows: .
|type of customer|2014|2013|2012|
|restaurants|62% ( 62 % )|61% ( 61 % )|63% ( 63 % )|
|healthcare|9|10|10|
|education government|9|8|8|
|travel leisure retail|8|8|8|
|other ( 1 )|12|13|11|
|totals|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports . none of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented . sources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases . these suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers . purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies . we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products . the program covers the purchasing and marketing of sysco brand merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines . sysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs . we also focus on increasing profi tability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers . this includes the construction and operation of regional distribution centers ( rdcs ) , which aggregate inventory demand to optimize the supply chain activities for certain products for all sysco broadline operating companies in the region . currently , we have two rdcs in operation , one in virginia and one in florida . working capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash fl ow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings . see the discussion in 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , liquidity and capital resources 201d at item 7 regarding our liquidity , fi nancial position and sources and uses of funds . credit terms we extend to our customers can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness . we monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary . a majority of our sales orders are fi lled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed . we generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand . the level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfi llment lead times and customer demand . we also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities . we take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 30 days or more. .
Question: what was the change in restaurants percentage of sales from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | -0.02 |
FINQA3785 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we cannot assure you that the gener restructuring will be completed or that the terms thereof will not be changed materially . in addition , gener is in the process of restructuring the debt of its subsidiaries , termoandes s.a . ( 2018 2018termoandes 2019 2019 ) and interandes , s.a . ( 2018 2018interandes 2019 2019 ) , and expects that the maturities of these obligations will be extended . under-performing businesses during 2003 we sold or discontinued under-performing businesses and construction projects that did not meet our investment criteria or did not provide reasonable opportunities to restructure . it is anticipated that there will be less ongoing activity related to write-offs of development or construction projects and impairment charges in the future . the businesses , which were affected in 2003 , are listed below . impairment project name project type date location ( in millions ) .
|project name|project type|date|location|impairment ( in millions )|
|ede este ( 1 )|operating|december 2003|dominican republic|$ 60|
|wolf hollow|operating|december 2003|united states|$ 120|
|granite ridge|operating|december 2003|united states|$ 201|
|colombia i|operating|november 2003|colombia|$ 19|
|zeg|construction|december 2003|poland|$ 23|
|bujagali|construction|august 2003|uganda|$ 76|
|el faro|construction|april 2003|honduras|$ 20|
( 1 ) see note 4 2014discontinued operations . improving credit quality our de-leveraging efforts reduced parent level debt by $ 1.2 billion in 2003 ( including the secured equity-linked loan previously issued by aes new york funding l.l.c. ) . we refinanced and paid down near-term maturities by $ 3.5 billion and enhanced our year-end liquidity to over $ 1 billion . our average debt maturity was extended from 2009 to 2012 . at the subsidiary level we continue to pursue limited recourse financing to reduce parent credit risk . these factors resulted in an overall reduced cost of capital , improved credit statistics and expanded access to credit at both aes and our subsidiaries . liquidity at the aes parent level is an important factor for the rating agencies in determining whether the company 2019s credit quality should improve . currency and political risk tend to be biggest variables to sustaining predictable cash flow . the nature of our large contractual and concession-based cash flow from these businesses serves to mitigate these variables . in 2003 , over 81% ( 81 % ) of cash distributions to the parent company were from u.s . large utilities and worldwide contract generation . on february 4 , 2004 , we called for redemption of $ 155049000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , which represents the entire outstanding principal amount of the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , and $ 34174000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 . the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 and the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 were redeemed on march 8 , 2004 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date . the mandatory redemption of the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 was being made with a portion of our 2018 2018adjusted free cash flow 2019 2019 ( as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued ) for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2003 as required by the indenture and was made on a pro rata basis . on february 13 , 2004 we issued $ 500 million of unsecured senior notes . the unsecured senior notes mature on march 1 , 2014 and are callable at our option at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the unsecured senior notes plus a make-whole premium . the unsecured senior notes were issued at a price of 98.288% ( 98.288 % ) and pay interest semi-annually at an annual .
Question: what was the total in millions of impairment projects in the construction category in 2003?
Answer: | 119.0 |
FINQA3786 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund managers . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) and we are able to redeem our investment in the near-term . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers , or the investment manager . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are valued using the nav based on valuation models of underlying securities which generally include significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners may use various valuation methodologies , including the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . hedge funds are valued by independent administrators using various pricing sources and models based on the nature of the securities . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are generally categorized as level 3 as we cannot fully redeem our investment in the near-term . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 2.25 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we currently plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.0 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2014 . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 98 million to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we do not expect to make contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2014 as a result of our 2013 contributions . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019 - 2023|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 1960|$ 2030|$ 2110|$ 2200|$ 2300|$ 13240|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|200|210|210|220|220|1070|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 383 million in 2013 , $ 380 million in 2012 , and $ 378 million in 2011 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .
Question: what is the change in estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 , from 2015 to 2016 in millions?
Answer: | 80.0 |
FINQA3787 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2004 annual report 29 firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments . in addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments and are retained in corporate . these retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments . capital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements . the amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity . effective with the third quarter of 2004 , new methodologies were implemented to calculate the amount of capital allocated to each segment . as part of the new methodology , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , is allocated solely to corporate . although u.s . gaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see note 15 on page 109 of this annual report ) , the firm has elected not to include goodwill or the related capital in each of the business segments for management reporting purposes . see the capital management section on page 50 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework . credit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share . at the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based on pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures . prior to the merger , the credit reimburse- ment was based on pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients . tax-equivalent adjustments segment results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes . refer to page 25 of this annual report for additional details . description of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business . the management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies . at the time of the merger , several of the allocation method- ologies were revised , as noted below . the changes became effective july 1 , 2004 . as prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods begin- ning with the third quarter of 2004 . further , the firm intends to continue to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and it is anticipated that further refinements may be implemented in future periods . revenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions . these revenue sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of businesses . funds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and interest expense to each line of business and also serves to transfer interest rate risk to corporate . while business segments may periodically retain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing or other business-specific risks , the bal- ance of the firm 2019s overall interest rate risk exposure is included and managed in corporate . in the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms . expense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments . those expenses are allocated based on their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided . effective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage segment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .
|year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )|year ended december 31 , 2004|year ended december 31 , 2003|year ended december 31 , change|2004|2003|
|investment bank|$ 2948|$ 2805|5% ( 5 % )|17% ( 17 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
|retail financial services|2199|1547|42|24|37|
|card services|1274|683|87|17|20|
|commercial banking|608|307|98|29|29|
|treasury & securities services|440|422|4|17|15|
|asset & wealth management|681|287|137|17|5|
|corporate|61|668|-91 ( 91 )|nm|nm|
|total|$ 8211|$ 6719|22% ( 22 % )|16% ( 16 % )|19% ( 19 % )|
.
Question: in 2004 what was the ratio of the investment bank to the retail financial services operations operating earnings
Answer: | 1.34061 |
FINQA3788 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 , largely due to higher legal and regulatory fees in 2016 related to our business activities and product offerings as well as higher professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . the overall decrease in operating expenses in 2017 when compared with 2016 was partially offset by the following increases : 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense resulting from incentive payments made to facilitate the transition of the russell contract open interest , as well as increased costs of revenue sharing agreements for certain licensed products . the overall increase in 2017 was partially offset by lower expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to lower volume for these products compared to 2016 . 2022 compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of higher average headcount primarily in our international locations as well as normal cost of living adjustments . 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . the following table shows the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the net decrease in operating expenses . ( dollars in millions ) over-year change change as a percentage of 2015 expenses .
|( dollars in millions )|year-over-yearchange|change as apercentage of2015 expenses|
|loss on datacenter and related legal fees|$ 28.6|2% ( 2 % )|
|professional fees and outside services|24.4|2|
|foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation|13.2|1|
|licensing and other fee agreements|12.0|1|
|reorganization severance and retirement costs|-8.1 ( 8.1 )|-1 ( 1 )|
|real estate taxes and fees|-10.0 ( 10.0 )|-1 ( 1 )|
|other expenses net|-5.7 ( 5.7 )|2014|
|total|$ 54.4|4% ( 4 % )|
overall operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 due to the following reasons : 2022 in 2016 , we recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees as a result of our sale and leaseback of our datacenter . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense increased in 2016 largely due to an increase in legal and regulatory efforts related to our business activities and product offerings as well as an increase in professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . 2022 in 2016 , we recognized a net loss of $ 24.5 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances , compared with a net loss of $ 11.3 million in 2015 . 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both higher volume and an increase in license rates for certain equity and energy products. .
Question: how much was the total operating expenses in 2016 in millions of dollars?
Answer: | 1414.4 |
FINQA3789 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 .
||december 312011|january 12011|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 1941055|$ 1737059|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|102103|126811|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 2043158|$ 1863870|
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2011 , january 1 , 2011 and january 2 , 2010 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 2011-12 superseded certain pending paragraphs in asu 2011-05 201ccomprehensive income 2013 presentation of comprehensive income 201d to effectively defer only those changes in asu 2011-05 that related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income . the adoption of asu 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . in january 2010 , the fasb issued asu no . 2010-06 201cfair value measurements and disclosures 2013 improving disclosures about fair value measurements . 201d asu 2010-06 requires new disclosures for significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the activity within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy . the updated guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value . the updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2009 , with the exception of the new level 3 activity disclosures , which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2010 . the adoption of asu 2010-06 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2011 and prior years . as a result of utilizing lifo , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 29554 and $ 16040 for fiscal 2010 and 2009 , respectively . prior to fiscal 2011 , the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . product cores are included as part of the company's merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company's other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 31 , 2011 and january 1 , 2011 , were $ 126840 and $ 103989 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at year-end for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were as follows : inventories at fifo , net adjustments to state inventories at lifo inventories at lifo , net december 31 , $ 1941055 102103 $ 2043158 january 1 , $ 1737059 126811 $ 1863870 .
Question: how is the cashflow from operations affected by the change in inventories at lifo net?
Answer: | -179288.0 |
FINQA3790 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 4.069 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities . we believe that our current cash position , access to the long-term debt capital markets and cash flow generated from operations should be adequate not only for operating requirements but also to enable us to complete our capital expenditure programs and to fund dividend payments , share repurchases and long-term debt payments through the next several years . in addition , we have funds available from our commercial paper program and the ability to obtain alternative sources of financing . we regularly evaluate opportunities to optimize our capital structure , including through issuances of debt to refinance existing debt and to fund ongoing cash needs . cash flows from operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .
||2017|2016|2015|
|net income|$ 4910|$ 3431|$ 4844|
|non-cash operating activities ( 1 )|5776|6444|4122|
|pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )|-7794 ( 7794 )|-2668 ( 2668 )|-1229 ( 1229 )|
|hedge margin receivables and payables|-732 ( 732 )|-142 ( 142 )|170|
|income tax receivables and payables|-550 ( 550 )|-505 ( 505 )|-6 ( 6 )|
|changes in working capital and other non-current assets and liabilities|-178 ( 178 )|-62 ( 62 )|-418 ( 418 )|
|other operating activities|47|-25 ( 25 )|-53 ( 53 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 1479|$ 6473|$ 7430|
( 1 ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative transactions and foreign exchange , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout 2015 to 2017 . most of the variability in operating cash flows during the 2015 to 2017 time period relates to the funding of our company-sponsored pension and postretirement benefit plans ( and related cash tax deductions ) . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company- sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 we made discretionary contributions to our three primary company-sponsored u.s . pension plans totaling $ 7.291 , $ 2.461 and $ 1.030 billion in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 2022 the remaining contributions from 2015 to 2017 were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . apart from the transactions described above , operating cash flow was impacted by changes in our working capital position , payments for income taxes and changes in hedge margin payables and receivables . cash payments for income taxes were $ 1.559 , $ 2.064 and $ 1.913 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and were primarily impacted by the timing of current tax deductions . the net hedge margin collateral ( paid ) /received from derivative counterparties was $ ( 732 ) , $ ( 142 ) and $ 170 million during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , due to settlements and changes in the fair value of the derivative contracts used in our currency and interest rate hedging programs . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were $ 4.069 billion , of which approximately $ 1.800 billion was held by foreign subsidiaries . the amount of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the u.s . continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . as a result of the tax act , all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities held by foreign subsidiaries are generally available for distribution to the u.s . without any u.s . federal income taxes . any such distributions may be subject to foreign withholding and u.s . state taxes . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the difference in millions of pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | 5126.0 |
FINQA3791 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for securities that are quoted in active markets , the trustee/ custodian determines fair value by applying securities 2019 prices obtained from its pricing vendors . for commingled funds that are not actively traded , the trustee applies pricing information provided by investment management firms to the unit quanti- ties of such funds . investment management firms employ their own pricing vendors to value the securities underlying each commingled fund . underlying securities that are not actively traded derive their prices from investment managers , which in turn , employ vendors that use pricing models ( e.g. , discounted cash flow , comparables ) . the domestic defined benefit plans have no investment in our stock , except through the s&p 500 commingled trust index fund . the trustee obtains estimated prices from vendors for secu- rities that are not easily quotable and they are categorized accordingly as level 3 . the following table details further information on our plan assets where we have used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) : .
|( in millions )|level 3|
|balance as of december 31 2016|$ 11|
|purchases|28|
|distributions|-1 ( 1 )|
|gain ( loss )|1|
|balance as of december 31 2017|$ 39|
pension trusts 2019 asset allocations there are two pension trusts , one in the u.s . and one in the u.k . the u.s . pension trust had assets of $ 1739 a0 million and $ 1632 a0million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 respectively , and the target allocations in 2017 include 68% ( 68 % ) fixed income , 27% ( 27 % ) domestic equities and 5% ( 5 % ) international equities . the u.k . pension trust had assets of $ 480 a0 million and $ 441 a0 million as of december a0 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respec- tively , and the target allocations in 2017 include 40% ( 40 % ) fixed income , 30% ( 30 % ) diversified growth funds , 20% ( 20 % ) equities and 10% ( 10 % ) real estate . the pension assets are invested with the goal of producing a combination of capital growth , income and a liability hedge . the mix of assets is established after consideration of the long- term performance and risk characteristics of asset classes . investments are selected based on their potential to enhance returns , preserve capital and reduce overall volatility . holdings are diversified within each asset class . the portfolios employ a mix of index and actively managed equity strategies by market capitalization , style , geographic regions and economic sec- tors . the fixed income strategies include u.s . long duration securities , opportunistic fixed income securities and u.k . debt instruments . the short-term portfolio , whose primary goal is capital preservation for liquidity purposes , is composed of gov- ernment and government- agency securities , uninvested cash , receivables and payables . the portfolios do not employ any financial leverage . u.s . defined contribution plans assets of the defined contribution plans in the u.s . consist pri- marily of investment options which include actively managed equity , indexed equity , actively managed equity/bond funds , target date funds , s&p global inc . common stock , stable value and money market strategies . there is also a self- directed mutual fund investment option . the plans purchased 228248 shares and sold 297750 shares of s&p global inc . common stock in 2017 and purchased 216035 shares and sold 437283 shares of s&p global inc . common stock in 2016 . the plans held approximately 1.5 a0million shares of s&p global inc . com- mon stock as of december a031 , 2017 and 1.6 a0million shares as of december a031 , 2016 , with market values of $ 255 a0million and $ 171 a0million , respectively . the plans received dividends on s&p global inc . common stock of $ 3 a0million and $ 2 a0million during the years ended december a031 , 2017 and december a031 , 2016 respectively . 8 . stock-based compensation we issue stock-based incentive awards to our eligible employ- ees and directors under the 2002 employee stock incentive plan and a director deferred stock ownership plan . 2002 employee stock incentive plan ( the 201c2002 plan 201d ) 2014 the 2002 plan permits the granting of nonquali- fied stock options , stock appreciation rights , performance stock , restricted stock and other stock-based awards . director deferred stock ownership plan 2014 under this plan , common stock reserved may be credited to deferred stock accounts for eligible directors . in general , the plan requires that 50% ( 50 % ) of eligible directors 2019 annual com- pensation plus dividend equivalents be credited to deferred stock accounts . each director may also elect to defer all or a portion of the remaining compensation and have an equiva- lent number of shares credited to the deferred stock account . recipients under this plan are not required to provide con- sideration to us other than rendering service . shares will be delivered as of the date a recipient ceases to be a member of the board of directors or within five years thereafter , if so elected . the plan will remain in effect until terminated by the board of directors or until no shares of stock remain avail- able under the plan . s&p global 2017 annual report 71 .
Question: what was the ratio of the pension trust assets for 2017 to 2016 $ 1739 million and $ 1632
Answer: | 1.06556 |
FINQA3792 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in particular , we have received commitments for $ 30.0 billion in debt financing to fund the transactions which is comprised of ( i ) a $ 4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility , ( ii ) a $ 7.0 billion term loan credit facility and ( iii ) a $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility . our reliance on the financing from the $ 19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility commitment is intended to be reduced through one or more secured note offerings or other long-term financings prior to the merger closing . however , there can be no assurance that we will be able to issue any such secured notes or other long-term financings on terms we find acceptable or at all , especially in light of the recent debt market volatility , in which case we may have to exercise some or all of the commitments under the secured bridge facility to fund the transactions . accordingly , the costs of financing for the transactions may be higher than expected . credit rating downgrades could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t-mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings , and , as a result , cost of capital . our current ratings reflect each rating agency 2019s opinion of our financial strength , operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations or , following the completion of the transactions , obligations to the combined company 2019s obligors . each rating agency reviews these ratings periodically and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future . a downgrade in the rating of us and/or sprint could adversely affect the businesses , cash flows , financial condition and operating results of t- mobile and , following the transactions , the combined company . we have incurred , and will incur , direct and indirect costs as a result of the transactions . we have incurred , and will incur , substantial expenses in connection with and as a result of completing the transactions , and over a period of time following the completion of the transactions , the combined company also expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating our and sprint 2019s businesses , operations , policies and procedures . a portion of the transaction costs related to the transactions will be incurred regardless of whether the transactions are completed . while we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred , factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses . many of the expenses that will be incurred , by their nature , are difficult to estimate accurately . these expenses will exceed the costs historically borne by us . these costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to the transactions and the financial condition and results of operations of the combined company following the transactions . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2018 , our significant properties that we primarily lease and use in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: .
||approximate number|approximate size in square feet|
|switching centers|61|1300000|
|data centers|6|500000|
|call center|17|1300000|
|warehouses|21|500000|
as of december 31 , 2018 , we primarily leased : 2022 approximately 64000 macro towers and 21000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites . 2022 approximately 2200 t-mobile and metro by t-mobile retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . 2022 office space totaling approximately 1000000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . in january 2019 , we executed leases totaling approximately 170000 additional square feet for our corporate headquarters . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . 2022 office space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1700000 square feet , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes. .
Question: what was the average size of the 61 switching centers in square feet
Answer: | 21311.47541 |
FINQA3793 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : .
||2008|2007|
|deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax|$ -4332 ( 4332 )|$ -4901 ( 4901 )|
|deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax|1238|1636|
|unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax|-16349 ( 16349 )|-486 ( 486 )|
during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .
Question: what is the pre-tax aggregate net unrealized loss in 2008?
Answer: | 26.0 |
FINQA3794 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||10/28/2012|10/27/2013|10/26/2014|10/25/2015|10/30/2016|10/29/2017|
|applied materials|100.00|171.03|207.01|165.34|293.64|586.91|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|127.18|149.14|156.89|163.97|202.72|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|131.94|167.25|160.80|193.36|288.96|
dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: how much percent did the investor make on applied materials from the first 5 years compared to the 2016 to 2017 time period ? ( not including compound interest )
Answer: | 192.64126 |
FINQA3795 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : .
||2008|2007|
|deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax|$ -4332 ( 4332 )|$ -4901 ( 4901 )|
|deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax|1238|1636|
|unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax|-16349 ( 16349 )|-486 ( 486 )|
during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .
Question: in 2008 what was the approximate tax rate on the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss
Answer: | 0.54902 |
FINQA3796 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax ; there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . available information the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k , proxy state- ments and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . i t e m 1 a . r i s k f a c t o r s in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , finan- cial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . r i s k s r e l a t i n g t o o u r b u s i n e s s our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a pre-tax loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 5.0 million , before corporate level rein- surance and taxes . effective for the third quarter 2005 , industrial risk losses have been excluded from catastrophe losses , with prior periods adjusted for comparison purposes . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year|calendar year||
|2006|$ 287.9|million|
|2005|$ 1485.7|million|
|2004|$ 390.0|million|
|2003|$ 35.0|million|
|2002|$ 30.0|million|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic under- writing tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the purchase of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount . we focus on potential losses that can be generated by any single event as part of our evaluation and monitoring of our aggre- gate exposure to catastrophic events . accordingly , we employ various techniques to estimate the amount of loss we could sustain from any single catastrophic event in various geographical areas . these techniques range from non-modeled deterministic approaches 2014such as tracking aggregate limits exposed in catastrophe-prone zones and applying historic dam- age factors 2014to modeled approaches that scientifically measure catastrophe risks using sophisticated monte carlo simulation techniques that provide insights into the frequency and severity of expected losses on a probabilistic basis . if our loss reserves are inadequate to meet our actual losses , net income would be reduced or we could incur a loss . we are required to maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability of losses and loss adjustment expenses for both reported and unreported claims incurred . these reserves are only estimates of what we believe the settlement and adminis- tration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances known to us . in setting reserves for our reinsurance liabilities , we rely on claim data supplied by our ceding companies and brokers and we employ actuarial and statistical projections . the information received from our ceding companies is not always timely or accurate , which can contribute to inaccuracies in our 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 23 http://www.everestre.com .
Question: what is the percentage change of the , pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2003 to 2004
Answer: | 355.0 |
FINQA3797 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: prior to its adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company recorded compensation expense for restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over their vesting period . if an employee forfeited the award prior to vesting , the company reversed out the previously expensed amounts in the period of forfeiture . as required upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company must base its accruals of compensation expense on the estimated number of awards for which the requisite service period is expected to be rendered . actual forfeitures are no longer recorded in the period of forfeiture . in 2005 , the company recorded a pre-tax credit of $ 2.8 million in cumulative effect of accounting change , that represents the amount by which compensation expense would have been reduced in periods prior to adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) for restricted stock awards outstanding on july 1 , 2005 that are anticipated to be forfeited . a summary of non-vested restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity is presented below : shares ( in thousands ) weighted- average date fair .
||shares ( in thousands )|weighted- average grant date fair value|
|non-vested at december 31 2006:|2878|$ 13.01|
|issued|830|$ 22.85|
|released ( vested )|-514 ( 514 )|$ 15.93|
|canceled|-1197 ( 1197 )|$ 13.75|
|non-vested at december 31 2007:|1997|$ 15.91|
as of december 31 , 2007 , there was $ 15.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards . this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years . the total fair value of restricted shares and restricted stock units vested was $ 11.0 million , $ 7.5 million and $ 4.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the shareholders of the company previously approved the 2002 employee stock purchase plan ( 201c2002 purchase plan 201d ) , and reserved 5000000 shares of common stock for sale to employees at a price no less than 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the one-year offering period or the end of each of the six-month purchase periods . under sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the 2002 purchase plan was considered compensatory . effective august 1 , 2005 , the company changed the terms of its purchase plan to reduce the discount to 5% ( 5 % ) and discontinued the look-back provision . as a result , the purchase plan was not compensatory beginning august 1 , 2005 . for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 0.4 million in compensation expense for its employee stock purchase plan for the period in which the 2002 plan was considered compensatory until the terms were changed august 1 , 2005 . at december 31 , 2007 , 757123 shares were available for purchase under the 2002 purchase plan . 401 ( k ) plan the company has a 401 ( k ) salary deferral program for eligible employees who have met certain service requirements . the company matches certain employee contributions ; additional contributions to this plan are at the discretion of the company . total contribution expense under this plan was $ 5.7 million , $ 5.7 million and $ 5.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively. .
Question: as of december 31 2006 what was the ratio of the non-vested to the shares issued
Answer: | 3.46747 |
FINQA3798 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loans sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s dus program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations .
|in millions|2011|2010|
|january 1|$ 54|$ 71|
|reserve adjustments net|1|9|
|losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements|-8 ( 8 )|-2 ( 2 )|
|loan sales||-24 ( 24 )|
|december 31|$ 47|$ 54|
residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and gnma , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to investors of sufficient investment quality . key aspects of such covenants and representations and warranties include the loan 2019s compliance with any applicable loan criteria established by the investor , including underwriting standards , delivery of all required loan documents to the investor or its designated party , sufficient collateral valuation , and the validity of the lien securing the loan . as a result of alleged breaches of these contractual obligations , investors may request pnc to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or to repurchase loans . these investor indemnification or repurchase claims are typically settled on an individual loan basis through make- whole payments or loan repurchases ; however , on occasion we may negotiate pooled settlements with investors . indemnifications for loss or loan repurchases typically occur when , after review of the claim , we agree insufficient evidence exists to dispute the investor 2019s claim that a breach of a loan covenant and representation and warranty has occurred , such breach has not been cured , and the effect of such breach is deemed to have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the transferred loan . depending on the sale agreement and upon proper notice from the investor , we typically respond to such indemnification and repurchase requests within 60 days , although final resolution of the claim may take a longer period of time . with the exception of the sales the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 199 .
Question: during 2011 , what was the change in reserve for estimated losses included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet?
Answer: | 7.0 |
FINQA3799 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is listed and traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cipg 201d . as of february 13 , 2019 , there were approximately 10000 registered holders of our outstanding common stock . on february 13 , 2019 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.235 per share , payable on march 15 , 2019 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2019 . although it is the board 2019s current intention to declare and pay future dividends , there can be no assurance that such additional dividends will in fact be declared and paid . any and the amount of any such declaration is at the discretion of the board and will depend upon factors such as our earnings , financial position and cash requirements . equity compensation plans see item 12 for information about our equity compensation plans . transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2018 to december 31 , 2018 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .
||total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1|average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2|total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3|maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3|
|october 1 - 31|3824|$ 23.30|2014|$ 338421933|
|november 1 - 30|1750|$ 23.77|2014|$ 338421933|
|december 1 - 31|2014|2014|2014|$ 338421933|
|total|5574|$ 23.45|2014||
1 the total number of shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , repurchased were withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock- based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum in the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations by the sum of the number of withheld shares . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . in february 2018 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock , which was in addition to any amounts remaining under the 2017 share repurchase program . on july 2 , 2018 , in connection with the announcement of the acxiom acquisition , we announced that share repurchases will be suspended for a period of time in order to reduce the increased debt levels incurred in conjunction with the acquisition , and no shares were repurchased pursuant to the share repurchase programs in the periods reflected . there are no expiration dates associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the percentage of the total number of shares purchased in october
Answer: | 0.68604 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.