id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA3300 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .
|2016|2015|2014|2013|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|( $ 51232 )|( $ 52742 )|$ 2218|$ 17531|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .
Question: what amount of credit facilities are expiring from 2017 through 2021 , in millions?\\n
Answer: | 170.0 |
FINQA3301 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: goodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , significant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid , or inventory , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received , or ibnr , and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , sea- sonality , utilization of healthcare services and other rele- vant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liability for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2006 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the company 2019s medicaid managed care segment gener- ates revenues primarily from premiums received from the states in which it operates health plans . the company receives a fixed premium per member per month pursuant to our state contracts . the company generally receives premium payments during the month it provides services and recognizes premium revenue during the period in which it is obligated to provide services to its members . some states enact premium taxes or similar assessments , collectively premium taxes , and these taxes are recorded as general and administrative expenses . some contracts allow for additional premium related to certain supplemen- tal services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this data . these adjustments have been immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . the company 2019s specialty services segment generates revenues under contracts with state programs , healthcare organizations and other commercial organizations , as well as from our own subsidiaries on market-based terms . revenues are recognized when the related services are provided or as ratably earned over the covered period of service . premium and services revenues collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . for performance-based contracts the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . premiums and service revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and are recorded net of an allowance based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . as the company generally receives payments during the month in which services are provided , the allowance is typically not significant in comparison to total revenues and does not have a material impact on the pres- entation of the financial condition or results of operations . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: .
||2006|2005|2004|
|allowances beginning of year|$ 343|$ 462|$ 607|
|amounts charged to expense|512|80|407|
|write-offs of uncollectible receivables|-700 ( 700 )|-199 ( 199 )|-552 ( 552 )|
|allowances end of year|$ 155|$ 343|$ 462|
significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under con- tracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2007 and december 31 , 2011 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of georgia , indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 15% ( 15 % ) , 15% ( 15 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) , 17% ( 17 % ) and 16% ( 16 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 to $ 500 per member , up to an annual maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are responsible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . in addition , bridgeway participates in a risk-sharing program as part of its contract with the state of arizona for the reimbursement of certain contract service costs beyond a monetary threshold . reinsurance recoveries were $ 3674 , $ 4014 , and $ 3730 , in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4842 , $ 4105 , and $ 6724 in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments. .
Question: without the ar write-offs in 2006 , what would the ending a/r allowance have been in millions?
Answer: | 855.0 |
FINQA3302 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net income|$ 807|$ 3804|$ 3338|
|non-cash operating activities ( a )|7301|4505|4398|
|pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )|-917 ( 917 )|-1436 ( 1436 )|-3240 ( 3240 )|
|income tax receivables and payables|280|236|-319 ( 319 )|
|changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities|-148 ( 148 )|-12 ( 12 )|-340 ( 340 )|
|other operating activities|-107 ( 107 )|-24 ( 24 )|-2 ( 2 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 7216|$ 7073|$ 3835|
( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business . the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion . approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v . ( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) . excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s . for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | 0.84433 |
FINQA3303 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 11 . income taxes 2013 ( continued ) the federal income tax return for 2006 is subject to examination by the irs . in addition for 2007 and 2008 , the irs has invited the company to participate in the compliance assurance process ( 201ccap 201d ) , which is a voluntary program for a limited number of large corporations . under cap , the irs conducts a real-time audit and works contemporaneously with the company to resolve any issues prior to the filing of the tax return . the company has agreed to participate . the company believes this approach should reduce tax-related uncertainties , if any . the company and/or its subsidiaries also file income tax returns in various state , local and foreign jurisdictions . these returns , with few exceptions , are no longer subject to examination by the various taxing authorities before as discussed in note 1 , the company adopted the provisions of fin no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of fin no . 48 , the company recognized a decrease to beginning retained earnings on january 1 , 2007 of $ 37 million . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption was approximately $ 70 million . included in the balance at january 1 , 2007 , were $ 51 million of tax positions that if recognized would affect the effective tax rate . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows : ( in millions ) .
|balance january 1 2007|$ 70|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|12|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|3|
|reductions for tax positions related to the current year|-23 ( 23 )|
|settlements|-6 ( 6 )|
|expiration of statute of limitations|-3 ( 3 )|
|balance december 31 2007|$ 53|
the company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that payments of approximately $ 2 million will be made primarily due to the conclusion of state income tax examinations within the next 12 months . additionally , certain state and foreign income tax returns will no longer be subject to examination and as a result , there is a reasonable possibility that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $ 7 million . at december 31 , 2007 , there were $ 42 million of tax benefits that if recognized would affect the effective rate . the company recognizes interest accrued related to : ( 1 ) unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and ( 2 ) tax refund claims in other revenues on the consolidated statements of income . the company recognizes penalties in income tax expense ( benefit ) on the consolidated statements of income . during 2007 , the company recorded charges of approximately $ 4 million for interest expense and $ 2 million for penalties . provision has been made for the expected u.s . federal income tax liabilities applicable to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries , except for certain subsidiaries for which the company intends to invest the undistributed earnings indefinitely , or recover such undistributed earnings tax-free . at december 31 , 2007 , the company has not provided deferred taxes of $ 126 million , if sold through a taxable sale , on $ 361 million of undistributed earnings related to a domestic affiliate . the determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries is not practicable . in connection with a non-recurring distribution of $ 850 million to diamond offshore from a foreign subsidiary , a portion of which consisted of earnings of the subsidiary that had not previously been subjected to u.s . federal income tax , diamond offshore recognized $ 59 million of u.s . federal income tax expense as a result of the distribution . it remains diamond offshore 2019s intention to indefinitely reinvest future earnings of the subsidiary to finance foreign activities . total income tax expense for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , was different than the amounts of $ 1601 million , $ 1557 million and $ 639 million , computed by applying the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) to income before income taxes and minority interest for each of the years. .
Question: what is the income before tax in 2006?
Answer: | 4448.57143 |
FINQA3304 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) .
|( in millions )|2007|2006|2005|
|united kingdom|$ 5951|$ 5531|$ 2696|
|canada|4565|2014|1463|
|australia|3567|1519|1441|
|netherlands|2014|2014|992|
|germany|2944|2696|4217|
|total cross-border outstandings|$ 17027|$ 9746|$ 10809|
the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 . state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what are the total consolidated assets in 2007?
Answer: | 141891.66667 |
FINQA3305 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 272.9|
|retail electric price|-16.9 ( 16.9 )|
|net gas revenue|-9.1 ( 9.1 )|
|gas cost recovery asset|-3.0 ( 3.0 )|
|volume/weather|5.4|
|other|-2.3 ( 2.3 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 247.0|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
Answer: | 0.65251 |
FINQA3306 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: repatriated , the related u.s . tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings . as of november 30 , 2012 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 2.9 billion . the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 0.8 billion . as of november 30 , 2012 , we have u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 33.7 million for federal and $ 77.7 million for state . we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 1.9 million , $ 18.0 million and $ 17.6 million , respectively . the net operating loss carryforward assets , federal tax credits and foreign tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2017 through 2032 . the state tax credit carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely . the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , but are expected to be fully realized . in addition , we have been tracking certain deferred tax attributes of $ 45.0 million which have not been recorded in the financial statements pursuant to accounting standards related to stock-based compensation . these amounts are no longer included in our gross or net deferred tax assets . pursuant to these standards , the benefit of these deferred tax assets will be recorded to equity if and when they reduce taxes payable . as of november 30 , 2012 , a valuation allowance of $ 28.2 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments and certain foreign assets . for fiscal 2012 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 23.0 million , of which $ 2.1 million was recorded as a tax benefit through the income statement . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2011|
|beginning balance|$ 163607|$ 156925|
|gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions|1038|11901|
|gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions|2014|-4154 ( 4154 )|
|gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions|23771|32420|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-1754 ( 1754 )|-29101 ( 29101 )|
|lapse of statute of limitations|-25387 ( 25387 )|-3825 ( 3825 )|
|foreign exchange gains and losses|-807 ( 807 )|-559 ( 559 )|
|ending balance|$ 160468|$ 163607|
as of november 30 , 2012 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.5 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2013 , it is reasonably possible table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | 0.04258 |
FINQA3307 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) .
|( in thousands )|amount|weighted average useful life ( years )|
|customer contracts and relationships|$ 576900|11|
|purchased technology|444500|7|
|backlog|105800|2|
|non-competition agreements|12100|2|
|trademarks|328500|9|
|total identifiable intangible assets|1467800||
|net liabilities assumed|-191288 ( 191288 )|n/a|
|goodwill ( 1 )|3459751|n/a|
|total estimated purchase price|$ 4736263||
_________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: what is the total in millions for goodwill for purchased technology and backlog?
Answer: | 550300.0 |
FINQA3308 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .
|in millions of dollars|accretable yield|carrying amount of loan receivable|allowance|
|beginning balance|$ 92|$ 1510|$ 122|
|purchases ( 1 )|14|329|2014|
|disposals/payments received|-5 ( 5 )|-967 ( 967 )|2014|
|accretion|-52 ( 52 )|52|2014|
|builds ( reductions ) to the allowance|-21 ( 21 )|1|-27 ( 27 )|
|increase to expected cash flows|10|2|2014|
|fx/other|-11 ( 11 )|-7 ( 7 )|2014|
|balance december 31 2009 ( 2 )|$ 27|$ 920|$ 95|
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what was the total change in millions of carrying amount of loan receivable?
Answer: | -590.0 |
FINQA3309 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mortgage banking activities the company enters into commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding . these commitments are referred to as interest rate lock commitments ( 201cirlcs 201d ) . irlcs on loans that the company intends to sell are considered to be derivatives and are , therefore , recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings . for purposes of determining fair value , the company estimates the fair value of an irlc based on the estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan and the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the irlc . the fair value excludes the market value associated with the anticipated sale of servicing rights related to each loan commitment . the fair value of these irlcs was a $ 0.06 million and a $ 0.02 million liability at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company also designates fair value relationships of closed loans held-for-sale against a combination of mortgage forwards and short treasury positions . short treasury relationships are economic hedges , rather than fair value or cash flow hedges . short treasury positions are marked-to-market , but do not receive hedge accounting treatment under sfas no . 133 , as amended . the mark-to-market of the mortgage forwards is included in the net change of the irlcs and the related hedging instruments . the fair value of the mark-to-market on closed loans was a $ 1.2 thousand and $ 1.7 million asset at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . irlcs , as well as closed loans held-for-sale , expose the company to interest rate risk . the company manages this risk by selling mortgages or mortgage-backed securities on a forward basis referred to as forward sale agreements . changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included as gain ( loss ) on loans and securities , net in the consolidated statement of income ( loss ) . the net change in irlcs , closed loans , mortgage forwards and the short treasury positions generated a net loss of $ 2.4 million in 2007 , a net gain of $ 1.6 million in 2006 and a net loss of $ 0.4 million in 2005 . credit risk credit risk is managed by limiting activity to approved counterparties and setting aggregate exposure limits for each approved counterparty . the credit risk , or maximum exposure , which results from interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options is represented by the fair value of contracts that have unrealized gains at the reporting date . conversely , we have $ 197.5 million of derivative contracts with unrealized losses at december 31 , 2007 . the company pledged approximately $ 87.4 million of its mortgage-backed securities as collateral of derivative contracts . while the company does not expect that any counterparty will fail to perform , the following table shows the maximum exposure associated with each counterparty to interest rate swaps and purchased interest rate options at december 31 , 2007 ( dollars in thousands ) : counterparty credit .
|counterparty|credit risk|
|bank of america|$ 48161|
|lehman brothers|29136|
|jp morgan|18878|
|union bank of switzerland|15562|
|credit suisse first boston|11047|
|royal bank of scotland|6164|
|morgan stanley|2215|
|salomon brothers|1943|
|total exposure|$ 133106|
.
Question: what percentage of counterparty exposure at december 31 2007 is represented by lehman brothers?
Answer: | 0.21889 |
FINQA3310 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the long term . in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a . and vodafone group plc . we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward . in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas . a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low . in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway . carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate . in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology . consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially . recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks . smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service . finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base . with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity . we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets . as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth . we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn . our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites . property operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites . in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. .
|new sites ( acquired or constructed )|2015|2014|2013|
|u.s .|11595|900|5260|
|asia|2330|1560|1260|
|emea|4910|190|485|
|latin america|6535|5800|6065|
property operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the total number of sites acquired and constructed during 2015?
Answer: | 25370.0 |
FINQA3311 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) funded or to be funded through share distributions to participants of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) cash compensation contribution , has been excluded because it ultimately does not impact blackrock 2019s book value . the expense related to the merrill lynch cash compensation contribution ceased at the end of third quarter 2011 . as of first quarter 2012 , all of the merrill lynch contributions had been received . compensation expense associated with appreciation ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . management believes operating income exclusive of these items is a useful measure in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance and helps enhance the comparability of this information for the reporting periods presented . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes the exclusion of such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may have an economic offset in non-operating income ( expense ) . examples of such adjustments include bgi transaction and integration costs , u.k . lease exit costs , contribution to stifs , restructuring charges , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctuations in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance with other companies . management uses both the gaap and non- gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes the exclusion of such costs is useful because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , substantially offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , is presented below . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis . ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 54 ) $ ( 114 ) $ 23 less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 18 ) 2 ( 13 ) non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) . . . . . . ( 36 ) ( 116 ) 36 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans . . . . ( 6 ) 3 ( 11 ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 42 ) $ ( 113 ) $ 25 ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . management believes non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides comparability of this information among reporting periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , substantially offsets the gain ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management .
|( dollar amounts in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|non-operating income ( expense ) gaap basis|$ -54 ( 54 )|$ -114 ( 114 )|$ 23|
|less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci|-18 ( 18 )|2|-13 ( 13 )|
|non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 )|-36 ( 36 )|-116 ( 116 )|36|
|compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans|-6 ( 6 )|3|-11 ( 11 )|
|non-operating income ( expense ) less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci as adjusted|$ -42 ( 42 )|$ -113 ( 113 )|$ 25|
the portion of compensation expense associated with certain long-term incentive plans ( 201cltip 201d ) funded or to be funded through share distributions to participants of blackrock stock held by pnc and a merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) cash compensation contribution , has been excluded because it ultimately does not impact blackrock 2019s book value . the expense related to the merrill lynch cash compensation contribution ceased at the end of third quarter 2011 . as of first quarter 2012 , all of the merrill lynch contributions had been received . compensation expense associated with appreciation ( depreciation ) on investments related to certain blackrock deferred compensation plans has been excluded as returns on investments set aside for these plans , which substantially offset this expense , are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) . management believes operating income exclusive of these items is a useful measure in evaluating blackrock 2019s operating performance and helps enhance the comparability of this information for the reporting periods presented . operating margin , as adjusted : operating income used for measuring operating margin , as adjusted , is equal to operating income , as adjusted , excluding the impact of closed-end fund launch costs and commissions . management believes the exclusion of such costs and commissions is useful because these costs can fluctuate considerably and revenues associated with the expenditure of these costs will not fully impact the company 2019s results until future periods . operating margin , as adjusted , allows the company to compare performance from period-to-period by adjusting for items that may not recur , recur infrequently or may have an economic offset in non-operating income ( expense ) . examples of such adjustments include bgi transaction and integration costs , u.k . lease exit costs , contribution to stifs , restructuring charges , closed-end fund launch costs , commissions paid to certain employees as compensation and fluctuations in compensation expense based on mark-to-market movements in investments held to fund certain compensation plans . the company also uses operating margin , as adjusted , to monitor corporate performance and efficiency and as a benchmark to compare its performance with other companies . management uses both the gaap and non- gaap financial measures in evaluating the financial performance of blackrock . the non-gaap measure by itself may pose limitations because it does not include all of the company 2019s revenues and expenses . revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , excludes distribution and servicing costs paid to related parties and other third parties . management believes the exclusion of such costs is useful because it creates consistency in the treatment for certain contracts for similar services , which due to the terms of the contracts , are accounted for under gaap on a net basis within investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue . amortization of deferred sales commissions is excluded from revenue used for operating margin measurement , as adjusted , because such costs , over time , substantially offset distribution fee revenue earned by the company . for each of these items , blackrock excludes from revenue used for operating margin , as adjusted , the costs related to each of these items as a proxy for such offsetting revenues . ( b ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to non-controlling interests , as adjusted : non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , is presented below . the compensation expense offset is recorded in operating income . this compensation expense has been included in non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , to offset returns on investments set aside for these plans , which are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis . ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 non-operating income ( expense ) , gaap basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 54 ) $ ( 114 ) $ 23 less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 18 ) 2 ( 13 ) non-operating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) . . . . . . ( 36 ) ( 116 ) 36 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans . . . . ( 6 ) 3 ( 11 ) non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 42 ) $ ( 113 ) $ 25 ( 1 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . management believes non-operating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci , as adjusted , provides comparability of this information among reporting periods and is an effective measure for reviewing blackrock 2019s non-operating contribution to its results . as compensation expense associated with ( appreciation ) depreciation on investments related to certain deferred compensation plans , which is included in operating income , substantially offsets the gain ( loss ) on the investments set aside for these plans , management .
Question: what losses are attributable to nci between 2010 and 2012 ? in millions $ .
Answer: | 29.0 |
FINQA3312 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 5 . pension and other benefit plans ( continued ) the funded status of the group 2019s allocation of defined benefit plans , excluding the retirement plan , reconciles with amounts recognized in the 1998 statements of assets and liabilities and interdivision account as follows ( in thousands ) : actuarial present value at september 30 , 1998 2014 .
|vested benefit obligation|$ -98512 ( 98512 )|
|accumulated benefit obligation|-108716 ( 108716 )|
|projected benefit obligation|$ -108716 ( 108716 )|
|plan assets at fair value at september 30 1998|146579|
|unrecognized transition liability|-1092 ( 1092 )|
|unrecognized net gain|-14623 ( 14623 )|
|unrecognized prior service cost|13455|
|prepaid pension cost at december 31 1998|$ 35603|
the weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations was 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 1998 . the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 10% ( 10 % ) for 1998 . middle management employees participate in a variety of incentive compensation plans . these plans provide for incentive payments based on the achievement of certain targeted operating results and other specific business goals . the targeted operating results are determined each year by senior management of packaging . the amounts charged to expense for these plans were $ 1599000 for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in june , 1992 , tenneco initiated an employee stock purchase plan ( 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . the plan allows u.s . and canadian employees of the group to purchase tenneco inc . common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount . each year , an employee in the plan may purchase shares with a discounted value not to exceed $ 21250 . the weighted average fair value of the employee purchase right , which was estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model and the assumptions described below except that the average life of each purchase right was assumed to be 90 days , was $ 6.31 for the period ended december 31 , 1998 . the espp was terminated as of september 30 , 1996 . tenneco adopted a new employee stock purchase plan effective april 1 , 1997 . under the respective espps , tenneco sold 36883 shares to group employees for the period ended april 11 , 1999 . in december , 1996 , tenneco adopted the 1996 stock ownership plan , which permits the granting of a variety of awards , including common stock , restricted stock , performance units , stock appreciation rights , and stock options to officers and employees of tenneco . tenneco can issue up to 17000000 shares of common stock under this plan , which will terminate december 31 , 2001 . the april 11 , 1999 , fair market value of the options granted was calculated using tenneco 2019s stock price at the grant date and multiplying the amount by the historical percentage of past black-scholes pricing values fair value ( approximately 25% ( 25 % ) ) . the fair value of each stock option issued by tenneco to the group in prior periods was estimated on the date of grant using the black-sholes option pricing model using the following ranges of weighted average assumptions for grants during the past three .
Question: is the projected benefit obligation greater than the plan assets at fair value at september 30 1998?
Answer: | no |
FINQA3313 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment values , which includes estimated bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2016 were $ 79.3 . contributions for funded plans resulted primarily from contractual and regulatory requirements . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 65 to $ 85 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2017 . these contributions are anticipated to be driven primarily by contractual and regulatory requirements for funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: .
||u.s .|international|
|2017|$ 150.3|$ 45.7|
|2018|152.7|48.3|
|2019|157.2|50.2|
|2020|161.8|51.1|
|2021|166.7|54.3|
|2022 20132026|909.6|306.9|
these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates . defined contribution plans we maintain a nonleveraged employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) which forms part of the air products and chemicals , inc . retirement savings plan ( rsp ) . the esop was established in may of 2002 . the balance of the rsp is a qualified defined contribution plan including a 401 ( k ) elective deferral component . a substantial portion of u.s . employees are eligible and participate . we treat dividends paid on esop shares as ordinary dividends . under existing tax law , we may deduct dividends which are paid with respect to shares held by the plan . shares of the company 2019s common stock in the esop totaled 3031534 as of 30 september 2016 . our contributions to the rsp include a company core contribution for certain eligible employees who do not receive their primary retirement benefit from the defined benefit pension plans , with the core contribution based .
Question: considering the year 2017 , what is the lowest projected benefit payment value?
Answer: | 45.7 |
FINQA3314 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: va health care delivery system through our network of providers . we are compensated by the va for the cost of our providers 2019 services at a specified contractual amount per service plus an additional administrative fee for each transaction . the contract , under which we began providing services on january 1 , 2008 , is comprised of one base period and four one-year option periods subject to renewals at the federal government 2019s option . we are currently in the first option period , which expires on september 30 , 2009 . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , revenues under this va contract were approximately $ 22.7 million , or less than 1% ( 1 % ) of our total premium and aso fees . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , military services premium revenues were approximately $ 3.2 billion , or 11.3% ( 11.3 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees , and military services aso fees totaled $ 76.8 million , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) of our total premiums and aso fees . international and green ribbon health operations in august 2006 , we established our subsidiary humana europe in the united kingdom to provide commissioning support to primary care trusts , or pcts , in england . under the contracts we are awarded , we work in partnership with local pcts , health care providers , and patients to strengthen health-service delivery and to implement strategies at a local level to help the national health service enhance patient experience , improve clinical outcomes , and reduce costs . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , revenues under these contracts were approximately $ 7.7 million , or less than 1% ( 1 % ) of our total premium and aso fees . we participated in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh was designed to support cms assigned medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh used disease management initiatives , including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms over the period which began november 1 , 2005 and ended august 15 , 2008 are subject to refund unless savings , satisfaction , and clinical improvement targets are met . under the terms of the contract , after a claims run-out period , cms is required to deliver a performance report during the third quarter of 2009 . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable , and revenues are not expected to be material when recognized . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 670000 members at december 31 , 2008 , representing approximately 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|392500|1586300|1978800|
|aso|277500|1364500|1642000|
|total commercial medical|670000|2950800|3620800|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer. .
Question: what is the average number of aso memberships?
Answer: | 821000.0 |
FINQA3315 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents .
|assumptions used in monte carlo lattice pricing model|year ended december 31 , 2016|year ended december 31 , 2015|year ended december 31 , 2014|
|risk-free interest rate|1.0% ( 1.0 % )|1.1% ( 1.1 % )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|
|expected dividend yield|2014% ( 2014 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|
|expected volatility 2014ansys stock price|21% ( 21 % )|23% ( 23 % )|25% ( 25 % )|
|expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index|16% ( 16 % )|14% ( 14 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
|expected term|2.8 years|2.8 years|2.8 years|
|correlation factor|0.65|0.60|0.70|
the company issued 35000 , 115485 and 39900 performance-based restricted stock awards during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . of the cumulative performance-based restricted stock awards issued , defined operating metrics were assigned to 63462 , 51795 and 20667 awards with grant-date fair values of $ 84.61 , $ 86.38 and $ 81.52 during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the grant-date fair value of the awards is being recorded from the grant date through the conclusion of the measurement period associated with each operating metric based on management's estimates concerning the probability of vesting . as of december 31 , 2016 , 7625 units of the total 2014 awards granted were earned and will be issued in 2017 . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 0.4 million , $ 0.4 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively . in addition , in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company granted restricted stock units of 488622 , 344500 and 364150 , respectively , that will vest over a three- or four-year period with weighted-average grant-date fair values of $ 88.51 , $ 86.34 and $ 82.13 , respectively . during 2016 and 2015 , 162019 and 85713 shares vested and were released , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , 838327 , 571462 and 344750 units were outstanding , respectively . total compensation expense is being recorded over the service period and was $ 19.1 million , $ 12.5 million and $ 5.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . in conjunction with a 2015 acquisition , ansys issued 68451 shares of replacement restricted stock with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $ 90.48 . of the $ 6.2 million grant-date fair value , $ 3.5 million , related to partially vested awards , was recorded as non-cash purchase price consideration . the remaining fair value will be recognized as stock compensation expense through the conclusion of the service period . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the company recorded $ 1.2 million and $ 0.6 million , respectively , of stock compensation expense related to these awards . in conjunction with a 2011 acquisition , the company granted performance-based restricted stock awards . vesting was determined based on the achievements of certain revenue and operating income targets of the entity post-acquisition . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 4.7 million . the company has granted deferred stock awards to non-affiliate independent directors , which are rights to receive shares of common stock upon termination of service as a director . in 2015 and prior , the deferred stock awards were granted quarterly in arrears and vested immediately upon grant . associated with these awards , the company established a non-qualified 409 ( a ) deferred compensation plan with assets held under a rabbi trust to provide directors an opportunity to diversify their vested awards . during open trading windows and at their elective option , the directors may convert their company shares into a variety of non-company-stock investment options in order to diversify their holdings . as of december 31 , 2016 , 5000 shares have been diversified and 184099 undiversified deferred stock awards have vested with the underlying shares remaining unissued until the service termination of the respective director owners . in may 2016 , the company granted 38400 deferred stock awards which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 1.9 million , $ 4.0 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the average total compensation expense associated with the awards from 2014 to 2016 in millions
Answer: | 3.13333 |
FINQA3316 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases 2014 the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 0.8 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , of approximately $ 5.9 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.3 million , $ 4.4 million and $ 4.4 million , respectively . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2011 , $ 5.2 and $ 3.4 ; 2012 , $ 4.1 and $ 2.6 ; 2013 , $ 3.8 and $ 2.3 ; 2014 , $ 2.9 and $ 1.7 ; 2015 , $ 2.1 and $ 1.3 , and thereafter , $ 2.8 and $ 1.6 , respectively . leveraged lease 2014 during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2010 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million and the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 33.4 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .
||2010|2009|
|remaining net rentals|$ 37.6|$ 44.1|
|estimated unguaranteed residual value|31.7|31.7|
|non-recourse mortgage debt|-30.1 ( 30.1 )|-34.5 ( 34.5 )|
|unearned and deferred income|-34.2 ( 34.2 )|-37.0 ( 37.0 )|
|net investment in leveraged lease|$ 5.0|$ 4.3|
10 . variable interest entities : consolidated operating properties 2014 included within the company 2019s consolidated operating properties at december 31 , 2010 are four consolidated entities that are vies and for which the company is the primary beneficiary . all of these entities have been established to own and operate real estate property . the company 2019s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership of the properties . these entities were deemed vies primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors are not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity 2019s activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these vies as a result of its controlling financial interest . during 2010 , the company sold two consolidated vie 2019s which the company was the primary beneficiary. .
Question: what is the growth rate in expenses incurred due to subleasing in 2010?
Answer: | -0.02273 |
FINQA3317 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements note 20 . regulation and capital adequacy the federal reserve board is the primary regulator of group inc. , a bank holding company under the bank holding company act of 1956 ( bhc act ) and a financial holding company under amendments to the bhc act effected by the u.s . gramm-leach-bliley act of 1999 . as a bank holding company , the firm is subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements that are computed in accordance with the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements ( which are based on the 2018basel 1 2019 capital accord of the basel committee ) . these capital requirements are expressed as capital ratios that compare measures of capital to risk-weighted assets ( rwas ) . the firm 2019s u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries , including gs bank usa , are subject to similar capital requirements . under the federal reserve board 2019s capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action that is applicable to gs bank usa , the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries must meet specific capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of assets , liabilities and certain off- balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory reporting practices . the firm and its u.s . bank depository institution subsidiaries 2019 capital amounts , as well as gs bank usa 2019s prompt corrective action classification , are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components , risk weightings and other factors . many of the firm 2019s subsidiaries , including gs&co . and the firm 2019s other broker-dealer subsidiaries , are subject to separate regulation and capital requirements as described below . group inc . federal reserve board regulations require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) and a minimum total capital ratio of 8% ( 8 % ) . the required minimum tier 1 capital ratio and total capital ratio in order to be considered a 201cwell-capitalized 201d bank holding company under the federal reserve board guidelines are 6% ( 6 % ) and 10% ( 10 % ) , respectively . bank holding companies may be expected to maintain ratios well above the minimum levels , depending on their particular condition , risk profile and growth plans . the minimum tier 1 leverage ratio is 3% ( 3 % ) for bank holding companies that have received the highest supervisory rating under federal reserve board guidelines or that have implemented the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital measure for market risk . other bank holding companies must have a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% ( 4 % ) . the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2012|as of december 2011|
|tier 1 capital|$ 66977|$ 63262|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13429|$ 13881|
|total capital|$ 80406|$ 77143|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 399928|$ 457027|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|13.8% ( 13.8 % )|
|total capital ratio|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|16.9% ( 16.9 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|7.0% ( 7.0 % )|
rwas under the federal reserve board 2019s risk-based capital requirements are calculated based on the amount of market risk and credit risk . rwas for market risk are determined by reference to the firm 2019s value-at-risk ( var ) model , supplemented by other measures to capture risks not reflected in the firm 2019s var model . credit risk for on- balance sheet assets is based on the balance sheet value . for off-balance sheet exposures , including otc derivatives and commitments , a credit equivalent amount is calculated based on the notional amount of each trade . all such assets and exposures are then assigned a risk weight depending on , among other things , whether the counterparty is a sovereign , bank or a qualifying securities firm or other entity ( or if collateral is held , depending on the nature of the collateral ) . tier 1 leverage ratio is defined as tier 1 capital under basel 1 divided by average adjusted total assets ( which includes adjustments for disallowed goodwill and intangible assets , and the carrying value of equity investments in non-financial companies that are subject to deductions from tier 1 capital ) . 184 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: as of december 2012 and 2011 in millions , what is the minimum total capital?
Answer: | 77143.0 |
FINQA3318 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .
|year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )|year ended december 31 , 2010|year ended december 31 , 2009|2008|
|balance january 1|$ 25544|$ 32619|$ 2014|
|washington mutual acquisition|2014|2014|39454|
|accretion into interest income|-3232 ( 3232 )|-4363 ( 4363 )|-1292 ( 1292 )|
|changes in interest rates on variable rate loans|-819 ( 819 )|-4849 ( 4849 )|-5543 ( 5543 )|
|other changes in expected cash flows ( a )|-2396 ( 2396 )|2137|2014|
|balance december 31|$ 19097|$ 25544|$ 32619|
|accretable yield percentage|4.35% ( 4.35 % )|5.14% ( 5.14 % )|5.81% ( 5.81 % )|
( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the highest three year accretable yield percentage?
Answer: | 0.0581 |
FINQA3319 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 701.2|
|volume/weather|8.9|
|retail electric price|7.3|
|net wholesale revenue|-2.7 ( 2.7 )|
|transmission equalization|-5.4 ( 5.4 )|
|reserve equalization|-5.5 ( 5.5 )|
|other|-7.5 ( 7.5 )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 696.3|
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 86 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 16 million net annual increase in revenues , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case and an increase in revenues collected through the energy efficiency rider , partially offset by a decrease in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . the rate case included the realignment of certain costs from collection in riders to base rates . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the rate case , the energy efficiency rider , and the storm damage rider . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to a wholesale customer contract termination in october transmission equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively planning , constructing , and operating entergy 2019s bulk transmission facilities . the transmission equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy mississippi exited the system agreement in november 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . reserve equalization revenue represents amounts received by entergy mississippi from certain other entergy utility operating companies , in accordance with the system agreement , to allocate the costs of collectively maintaining adequate electric generating capacity across the entergy system . the reserve equalization variance is primarily attributable to the realignment , effective february 2015 , of these revenues from the determination of base rates to inclusion in a rider . such revenues had a favorable effect on net revenue in 2014 , but minimal effect in 2015 . entergy .
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2015 for entergy mississippi , inc.?
Answer: | -4.9 |
FINQA3320 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .
||number of shares|weighted average grant date fair value|
|outstanding at december 31 2009|116677|$ 280|
|granted|134245|275|
|vested|-34630 ( 34630 )|257|
|cancelled|-19830 ( 19830 )|260|
|outstanding at december 31 2010|196462|283|
the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .
Question: for 2010 , assuming all of the outstanding restricted stock and performance shares were exercised , what would be the increase in stockholders equity?
Answer: | 55598746.0 |
FINQA3321 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) $ ( 2689 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production ( 1342 ) 6648 771 .
|( in millions )|2006|2005|2004|
|sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs|$ -5312 ( 5312 )|$ -3754 ( 3754 )|$ -2689 ( 2689 )|
|net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production|-1342 ( 1342 )|6648|771|
|extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs|1290|700|1349|
|development costs incurred during the period|1251|1030|609|
|changes in estimated future development costs|-527 ( 527 )|-552 ( 552 )|-628 ( 628 )|
|revisions of previous quantity estimates|1319|820|948|
|net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place|30|4557|33|
|accretion of discount|1882|1124|757|
|net change in income taxes|-660 ( 660 )|-6694 ( 6694 )|-627 ( 627 )|
|timing and other|-14 ( 14 )|307|97|
|net change for the year|-2083 ( 2083 )|4186|620|
|beginning of year|10601|6415|5795|
|end of year|$ 8518|$ 10601|$ 6415|
|net change for the year from discontinued operations|$ -216 ( 216 )|$ 162|$ -152 ( 152 )|
.
Question: if the 2007 year shows the same rate of change as 2006 , what would the projected ending cash flow balance be , in millions?
Answer: | 6844.29054 |
FINQA3322 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
||( in millions )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 208.3|
|base rates|10.6|
|volume/weather|8.3|
|2004 deferrals|7.5|
|price applied to unbilled electric sales|3.7|
|other|0.6|
|2004 net revenue|$ 239.0|
the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: | 0.14738 |
FINQA3323 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 .
|years ended ( in millions )|dec 292018|dec 302017|dec 312016|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 29432|$ 22110|$ 21808|
|net cash used for investing activities|-11239 ( 11239 )|-15762 ( 15762 )|-25817 ( 25817 )|
|net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities|-18607 ( 18607 )|-8475 ( 8475 )|-5739 ( 5739 )|
|net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents|$ -414 ( 414 )|$ -2127 ( 2127 )|$ -9748 ( 9748 )|
md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: | 0.33116 |
FINQA3324 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action applicable to gs bank usa , in order to meet the quantitative requirements for being a 201cwell-capitalized 201d depository institution , gs bank usa is required to maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) . gs bank usa agreed with the federal reserve board to maintain minimum capital ratios in excess of these 201cwell- capitalized 201d levels . accordingly , for a period of time , gs bank usa is expected to maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8% ( 8 % ) , a total capital ratio of at least 11% ( 11 % ) and a tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) . as noted in the table below , gs bank usa was in compliance with these minimum capital requirements as of december 2013 and december 2012 . the table below presents information regarding gs bank usa 2019s regulatory capital ratios under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements , which became effective on january 1 , 2013 . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|tier 1 capital|$ 20086|$ 20704|
|tier 2 capital|$ 116|$ 39|
|total capital|$ 20202|$ 20743|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 134935|$ 109669|
|tier 1 capital ratio|14.9% ( 14.9 % )|18.9% ( 18.9 % )|
|total capital ratio|15.0% ( 15.0 % )|18.9% ( 18.9 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|16.9% ( 16.9 % )|17.6% ( 17.6 % )|
the revised capital framework described above is also applicable to gs bank usa , which is an advanced approach banking organization under this framework . gs bank usa has also been informed by the federal reserve board that it has completed a satisfactory parallel run , as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to its calculations of rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . under the revised capital framework , as of january 1 , 2014 , gs bank usa became subject to a new minimum cet1 ratio requirement of 4% ( 4 % ) , increasing to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2015 . in addition , the revised capital framework changes the standards for 201cwell-capitalized 201d status under prompt corrective action regulations beginning january 1 , 2015 by , among other things , introducing a cet1 ratio requirement of 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and increasing the tier 1 capital ratio requirement from 6% ( 6 % ) to 8% ( 8 % ) . in addition , commencing january 1 , 2018 , advanced approach banking organizations must have a supplementary leverage ratio of 3% ( 3 % ) or greater . the basel committee published its final guidelines for calculating incremental capital requirements for domestic systemically important banking institutions ( d-sibs ) . these guidelines are complementary to the framework outlined above for g-sibs . the impact of these guidelines on the regulatory capital requirements of gs bank usa will depend on how they are implemented by the banking regulators in the united states . the deposits of gs bank usa are insured by the fdic to the extent provided by law . the federal reserve board requires depository institutions to maintain cash reserves with a federal reserve bank . the amount deposited by the firm 2019s depository institution held at the federal reserve bank was approximately $ 50.39 billion and $ 58.67 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively , which exceeded required reserve amounts by $ 50.29 billion and $ 58.59 billion as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . transactions between gs bank usa and its subsidiaries and group inc . and its subsidiaries and affiliates ( other than , generally , subsidiaries of gs bank usa ) are regulated by the federal reserve board . these regulations generally limit the types and amounts of transactions ( including credit extensions from gs bank usa ) that may take place and generally require those transactions to be on market terms or better to gs bank usa . the firm 2019s principal non-u.s . bank subsidiary , gsib , is a wholly-owned credit institution , regulated by the prudential regulation authority ( pra ) and the financial conduct authority ( fca ) and is subject to minimum capital requirements . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , gsib was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 193 .
Question: in millions , what was the change between 2013 and 2012 in tier 1 capital?
Answer: | -618.0 |
FINQA3325 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .
||2010|2009|2008|
|balance as of january 1,|$ 28520|$ 11482|$ 8850|
|current year increases|16219|26771|12059|
|recoveries and other|-22234 ( 22234 )|-9733 ( 9733 )|-9427 ( 9427 )|
|balance as of december 31,|$ 22505|$ 28520|$ 11482|
the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .
Question: in 2009 what was the percentage change in the allowance balance for the uncollectable accounts
Answer: | 1.48389 |
FINQA3326 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2004|2003|2002|2001|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 40549|( $ 41317 )|$ 18854|$ 3812|
money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .
Question: what is the difference of the payment for waterford lease obligation between 2003 and 2004?
Answer: | 20.6 |
FINQA3327 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2003|2002|2001|
|subsidiaries|$ 807|$ 771|$ 1038|
|affiliates|43|44|21|
4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .
Question: at december 31 , 2003 , what was the range of exposures for the outstanding letters of credit?
Answer: | 35000000.0 |
FINQA3328 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: .
|option expiration date|2009|
|option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :||
|put options purchased|20000|
|call options sold|15000|
|average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :||
|put options|$ 50.50|
|call options|$ 90.50|
in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .
Question: using the above listed average exercise price , what were the value of the call options sold?
Answer: | 1357500.0 |
FINQA3329 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 27 of 100 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2010 , are summarized in the following table: .
|( $ in millions )|payments due by period ( a ) total|payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year|payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years|payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years|payments due by period ( a ) more than5 years|
|long-term debt including capital leases|$ 2750.1|$ 34.5|$ 188.3|$ 367.1|$ 2160.2|
|interest payments on long-term debt ( b )|1267.5|160.5|316.4|304.2|486.4|
|operating leases|93.2|31.1|37.1|16.6|8.4|
|purchase obligations ( c )|6586.9|2709.5|3779.4|98.0|2212|
|total payments on contractual obligations|$ 10697.7|$ 2935.6|$ 4321.2|$ 785.9|$ 2655.0|
total payments on contractual obligations $ 10697.7 $ 2935.6 $ 4321.2 $ 785.9 $ 2655.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end 2010 exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may or may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . the table above does not include $ 60.1 million of uncertain tax positions , the timing of which is uncertain . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be in the range of $ 30 million in 2011 . this estimate may change based on changes in the pension protection act and actual plan asset performance , among other factors . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 71.4 million , $ 74.0 million , $ 77.1 million , $ 80.3 million and $ 84.9 million for the years ending december 31 , 2011 through 2015 , respectively , and a total of $ 483.1 million for the years 2016 through 2020 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be between $ 21.8 million ( 20ac16.5 million ) to $ 23.2 million ( 20ac17.5 million ) in each of the years 2011 through 2015 and a total of $ 102.7 million ( 20ac77.5 million ) for the years 2016 through 2020 . for the u.s . pension plans in 2011 , we changed our return on asset assumption to 8.00 percent ( from 8.25 percent in 2010 ) and our discount rate assumption to an average of 5.55 percent ( from 6.00 percent in 2010 ) . based on the changes in assumptions , pension expense in 2011 is anticipated to be relatively flat compared to 2010 . a reduction of the expected return on pension assets assumption by a quarter of a percentage point would result in an estimated $ 2.9 million increase in the 2011 global pension expense , while a quarter of a percentage point reduction in the discount rate applied to the pension liability would result in an estimated $ 3.5 million of additional pension expense in 2011 . additional information regarding the company 2019s pension plans is provided in note 14 accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 20 cents per share in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 . total dividends paid were $ 35.8 million in 2010 , $ 37.4 million in 2009 and $ 37.5 million in 2008 . on january 26 , 2011 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividends to 7 cents per share . share repurchases our share repurchases , net of issuances , totaled $ 506.7 million in 2010 , $ 5.1 million in 2009 and $ 299.6 million in 2008 . on november 2 , 2010 , we acquired 2775408 shares of our publicly held common stock in a private transaction for $ 88.8 million . on february 17 , 2010 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 125.0 million of our common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings . we advanced the $ 125.0 million on february 22 , 2010 , and received 4323598 shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price . the agreement was settled on may 20 , 2010 , and the company received an additional 398206 shares . net repurchases in 2008 included a $ 31 million settlement on january 7 , 2008 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 1350000 shares . from january 1 through february 24 , 2011 , ball repurchased an additional $ 143.3 million of its common stock. .
Question: was was the average cost per share of the 2008 settlement of the 2007 forward repo contract?
Answer: | 22.96296 |
FINQA3330 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . segment information ( continued ) ( 1 ) included in net sales were export sales from the u.s . of $ 229 million , $ 241 million and $ 246 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 2 ) excluded from net sales were intra-company sales between segments of approximately two percent of net sales in each of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 3 ) included in net sales were sales to one customer of $ 2143 million , $ 1984 million and $ 1993 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such net sales were included in the following segments : cabinets and related products , plumbing products , decorative architectural products and other specialty products . ( 4 ) net sales from the company 2019s operations in the u.s . were $ 5793 million , $ 5394 million and $ 5618 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 5 ) net sales , operating ( loss ) profit , property additions and depreciation and amortization expense for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 excluded the results of businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . ( 6 ) included in segment operating profit ( loss ) for 2012 was an impairment charge for other intangible assets as follows : other specialty products 2013 $ 42 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2011 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : cabinets and related products 2013 $ 44 million ; plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; decorative architectural products 2013 $ 75 million ; and other specialty products 2013 $ 374 million . included in segment operating ( loss ) profit for 2010 were impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows : plumbing products 2013 $ 1 million ; and installation and other services 2013 $ 697 million . ( 7 ) general corporate expense , net included those expenses not specifically attributable to the company 2019s segments . ( 8 ) the charge for litigation settlement , net in 2012 primarily relates to a business in the installation and other services segment and in 2011 relates to business units in the cabinets and related products and the other specialty products segments . ( 9 ) long-lived assets of the company 2019s operations in the u.s . and europe were $ 2795 million and $ 567 million , $ 2964 million and $ 565 million , and $ 3684 million and $ 617 million at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . ( 10 ) segment assets for 2012 and 2011 excluded the assets of businesses reported as discontinued operations in the respective years . p . severance costs as part of the company 2019s continuing review of its operations , actions were taken during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 to respond to market conditions . the company recorded charges related to severance and early retirement programs of $ 36 million , $ 17 million and $ 14 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . such charges are principally reflected in the statement of operations in selling , general and administrative expenses and were paid when incurred . q . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , which is included in other income ( expense ) , net , was as follows , in millions: .
||2012|2011|2010|
|income from cash and cash investments|$ 6|$ 8|$ 6|
|other interest income|1|1|1|
|income from financial investments net ( note e )|24|73|9|
|other items net|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-9 ( 9 )|
|total other net|$ 27|$ 77|$ 7|
other items , net , included realized foreign currency transaction losses of $ 2 million , $ 5 million and $ 2 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , as well as other miscellaneous items. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in income from cash and cash investments from 2010 to 2011
Answer: | 0.33333 |
FINQA3331 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management believes it is important for interna- tional paper to maintain an investment-grade credit rat- ing to facilitate access to capital markets on favorable terms . at december 31 , 2005 , the company held long- term credit ratings of bbb ( negative outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) from standard & poor 2019s and moody 2019s investor services , respectively . cash provided by operations cash provided by continuing operations totaled $ 1.5 billion for 2005 , compared with $ 2.1 billion in 2004 and $ 1.5 billion in 2003 . the major components of cash provided by continuing operations are earnings from continuing operations adjusted for non-cash in- come and expense items and changes in working capital . earnings from continuing operations adjusted for non-cash items declined by $ 83 million in 2005 versus 2004 . this compared with an increase of $ 612 million for 2004 over 2003 . working capital , representing international paper 2019s investments in accounts receivable and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , was $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2005 . cash used for working capital components increased by $ 591 million in 2005 , com- pared with a $ 86 million increase in 2004 and an $ 11 million increase in 2003 . the increase in 2005 was principally due to a decline in accrued liabilities at de- cember 31 , 2005 . investment activities capital spending from continuing operations was $ 1.2 billion in 2005 , or 84% ( 84 % ) of depreciation and amor- tization , comparable to the $ 1.2 billion , or 87% ( 87 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2004 , and $ 1.0 billion , or 74% ( 74 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2003 . the following table presents capital spending from continuing operations by each of our business segments for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 . in millions 2005 2004 2003 .
|in millions|2005|2004|2003|
|printing papers|$ 658|$ 590|$ 482|
|industrial packaging|187|179|165|
|consumer packaging|131|205|128|
|distribution|9|5|12|
|forest products|121|126|121|
|specialty businesses and other|31|39|31|
|subtotal|1137|1144|939|
|corporate and other|18|32|54|
|total from continuing operations|$ 1155|$ 1176|$ 993|
we expect capital expenditures in 2006 to be about $ 1.2 billion , or about 80% ( 80 % ) of depreciation and amor- tization . we will continue to focus our future capital spending on improving our key platform businesses in north america and on investments in geographic areas with strong growth opportunities . acquisitions in october 2005 , international paper acquired ap- proximately 65% ( 65 % ) of compagnie marocaine des cartons et des papiers ( cmcp ) , a leading moroccan corrugated packaging company , for approximately $ 80 million in cash plus assumed debt of approximately $ 40 million . in august 2005 , pursuant to an existing agreement , international paper purchased a 50% ( 50 % ) third-party interest in ippm ( subsequently renamed international paper distribution limited ) for $ 46 million to facilitate possi- ble further growth in asian markets . in 2001 , interna- tional paper had acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) interest in this business . the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2005 includes preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired , including approximately $ 50 million of goodwill . in july 2004 , international paper acquired box usa holdings , inc . ( box usa ) for approximately $ 400 million , including the assumption of approximately $ 197 million of debt , of which approximately $ 193 mil- lion was repaid by july 31 , 2004 . each of the above acquisitions was accounted for using the purchase method . the operating results of these acquisitions have been included in the con- solidated statement of operations from the dates of ac- quisition . financing activities 2005 : financing activities during 2005 included debt issuances of $ 1.0 billion and retirements of $ 2.7 billion , for a net debt and preferred securities reduction of $ 1.7 billion . in november and december 2005 , international paper investments ( luxembourg ) s.ar.l. , a wholly- owned subsidiary of international paper , issued $ 700 million of long-term debt with an initial interest rate of libor plus 40 basis points that can vary depending upon the credit rating of the company , and a maturity date in november 2010 . additionally , the subsidiary borrowed $ 70 million under a bank credit agreement with an initial interest rate of libor plus 40 basis points that can vary depending upon the credit rating of the company , and a maturity date in november 2006 . in december 2005 , international paper used pro- ceeds from the above borrowings , and from the sale of chh in the third quarter of 2005 , to repay approx- imately $ 190 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) and original maturities from 2008 to 2029 . the remaining proceeds from the borrowings and the chh sale will be used for further debt reductions in the first quarter of 2006. .
Question: what percentage of capital spending from continuing operations was from the printing papers segment in 2004?
Answer: | 0.5017 |
FINQA3332 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics business segment 2019s results of operations discussion . the increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily was due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our is&gs and aeronautics business segments . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , f-22 raptor , f-16 fighting falcon , c-130 hercules , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 14953|$ 14362|$ 13109|
|operating profit|1699|1630|1498|
|operating margins|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|11.3% ( 11.3 % )|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|
|backlog at year-end|30100|30500|27500|
2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 lrip contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 lrip contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception- to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . 2011 compared to 2010 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2011 increased $ 1.3 billion , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the growth in net sales primarily was due to higher volume of about $ 850 million for work performed on the f-35 lrip contracts as production increased ; higher volume of about $ 745 million for c-130 programs due to an increase in deliveries ( 33 c-130j aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 25 during 2010 ) and support activities ; about $ 425 million for f-16 support activities and an increase in aircraft deliveries ( 22 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to 20 during 2010 ) ; and approximately $ 90 million for higher volume on c-5 programs ( two c-5m aircraft delivered in 2011 compared to one during 2010 ) . these increases partially were offset by a decline in net sales of approximately $ 675 million due to lower volume on the f-22 program and lower net sales of about $ 155 million for the f-35 development contract as development work decreased. .
Question: what was the percent of net sales attributable to the f-35 lrip contracts included in the 2012 sales
Answer: | 0.04982 |
FINQA3333 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )|2015|2014|2013|
|net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )|$ 44620|$ 44619|$ 44016|
|less : markets-based net interest income|4813|5552|5492|
|net interest income excluding markets ( a )|$ 39807|$ 39067|$ 38524|
|average interest-earning assets|$ 2088242|$ 2049093|$ 1970231|
|less : average markets-based interest-earning assets|493225|510261|504218|
|average interest-earning assets excluding markets|$ 1595017|$ 1538832|$ 1466013|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis|2.14% ( 2.14 % )|2.18% ( 2.18 % )|2.23% ( 2.23 % )|
|net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets|0.97|1.09|1.09|
|net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets|2.50% ( 2.50 % )|2.54% ( 2.54 % )|2.63% ( 2.63 % )|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 82 jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report net interest income excluding markets-based activities ( formerly core net interest income ) in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of cib 2019s markets-based net interest income and related assets . management believes this exclusion provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . net interest income excluding cib markets-based activities data year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2015 2014 2013 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 44620 $ 44619 $ 44016 less : markets-based net interest income 4813 5552 5492 net interest income excluding markets ( a ) $ 39807 $ 39067 $ 38524 average interest-earning assets $ 2088242 $ 2049093 $ 1970231 less : average markets- based interest-earning assets 493225 510261 504218 average interest- earning assets excluding markets $ 1595017 $ 1538832 $ 1466013 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) 2.18% ( 2.18 % ) 2.23% ( 2.23 % ) net interest yield on average markets-based interest-earning assets 0.97 1.09 1.09 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding markets 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) 2.63% ( 2.63 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 80 . 2015 compared with 2014 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 740 million in 2015 to $ 39.8 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 56.2 billion to $ 1.6 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2015 predominantly reflected higher average loan balances and lower interest expense on deposits . the increase was partially offset by lower loan yields and lower investment securities net interest income . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest-earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 4 basis points to 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for 2014 compared with 2013 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets-based activities increased by $ 543 million in 2014 to $ 39.1 billion , and average interest-earning assets increased by $ 72.8 billion to $ 1.5 trillion . the increase in net interest income in 2014 predominantly reflected higher yields on investment securities , the impact of lower interest expense , and higher average loan balances . the increase was partially offset by lower yields on loans due to the run-off of higher-yielding loans and new originations of lower-yielding loans . the increase in average interest-earning assets largely reflected the impact of higher average balance of deposits with banks . these changes in net interest income and interest- earning assets resulted in the net interest yield decreasing by 9 basis points to 2.54% ( 2.54 % ) for 2014. .
Question: assuming a 1% ( 1 % ) increase in the 2015 interest yield on managed interest-earning assets , what would the three year average yield improve to?
Answer: | 1.85 |
FINQA3334 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: approved by the board of directors on april 21 , 2004 and expired on april 30 , 2006 . sources and uses in financing activities during 2005 related primarily to uses for the payment of a dividend ( $ 54.0 million ) and stock repurchase ( $ 26.7 million ) , and a source of cash from the issuance of common shares related to the exercise of employee stock options , the related tax benefit , and the employee stock purchase plan ( $ 9.7 million ) . cash dividends paid to shareholders were $ 162.5 million , $ 107.9 million , and $ 54.0 million during fiscal years 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . we believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital and other cash requirements at least through the end of fiscal 2010 . contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 , aggregated by type of contractual obligation .
|contractual obligations|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than 1 year|payments due by period 1-3 years|payments due by period 3-5 years|payments due by period more than 5 years|
|operating leases|$ 43438|$ 6581|$ 11582|$ 9263|$ 16012|
|purchase obligations|5078|422|2251|2405|0|
|total|$ 48516|$ 7003|$ 13833|$ 11668|$ 16012|
operating leases describes lease obligations associated with garmin facilities located in the u.s. , taiwan , the u.k. , and canada . purchase obligations are the aggregate of those purchase orders that were outstanding on december 29 , 2007 ; these obligations are created and then paid off within 3 months during the normal course of our manufacturing business . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk market sensitivity we have market risk primarily in connection with the pricing of our products and services and the purchase of raw materials . product pricing and raw materials costs are both significantly influenced by semiconductor market conditions . historically , during cyclical industry downturns , we have been able to offset pricing declines for our products through a combination of improved product mix and success in obtaining price reductions in raw materials costs . inflation we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business , financial condition or results of operations . if our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures , we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases . our inability or failure to do so could adversely affect our business , financial condition and results of operations . foreign currency exchange rate risk the operation of garmin 2019s subsidiaries in international markets results in exposure to movements in currency exchange rates . we generally have not been significantly affected by foreign exchange fluctuations .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 are due to operating leases?
Answer: | 0.89533 |
FINQA3335 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|non-current assets|$ 24460|
|property and equipment|138959|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|117990|
|other non-current liabilities|-18195 ( 18195 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 263214|
|goodwill ( 2 )|47481|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 80.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 38.0 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . ghana acquisition 2014on december 6 , 2010 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group limited ( 201cmtn group 201d ) to establish a joint venture in ghana . the joint venture is controlled by a holding company of which a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( the 201catc ghana subsidiary 201d ) holds a 51% ( 51 % ) interest and mobile telephone networks ( netherlands ) b.v. , a wholly owned subsidiary of mtn group ( the 201cmtn ghana subsidiary 201d ) holds a 49% ( 49 % ) interest . the joint venture is managed and controlled by the company and owns a tower operations company in ghana . pursuant to the agreement , on may 6 , 2011 , august 11 , 2011 and december 23 , 2011 , the joint venture acquired 400 , 770 and 686 communications sites , respectively , from mtn group 2019s operating subsidiary in ghana for an aggregate purchase price of $ 515.6 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 2.3 million and value added tax of $ 65.6 million ) . the aggregate purchase price was subsequently increased to $ 517.7 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 2.3 million and value added tax of $ 65.6 million ) after certain post-closing adjustments . under the terms of the purchase agreement , legal title to certain of the communications sites acquired on december 23 , 2011 will be transferred upon fulfillment of certain conditions by mtn group . prior to the fulfillment of these conditions , the company will operate and maintain control of these communications sites , and accordingly , reflect these sites in the allocation of purchase price and the consolidated operating results . in december 2011 , the company signed an amendment to its agreement with mtn group , which requires the company to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash-paying master lease agreements . the company currently estimates the fair value of remaining potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement to be between zero and $ 1.0 million and is estimated to be $ 0.9 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . the company has previously made payments under this arrangement of $ 2.6 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded an increase in fair value of $ 0.4 million as other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the ratio of the customer-related intangibles to the network location intangibles included in the purchase allocation price
Answer: | 2.10526 |
FINQA3336 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) sfas no . 148 . in accordance with apb no . 25 , the company recognizes compensation expense based on the excess , if any , of the quoted stock price at the grant date of the award or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock . the company 2019s stock option plans are more fully described in note 14 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d ( sfas 123r ) , as further described below . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company reevaluated the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options issued to employees . as a result , the company lowered its expected volatility assumption for options granted after july 1 , 2005 to approximately 30% ( 30 % ) and increased the expected life of option grants to 6.25 years using the simplified method permitted by sec sab no . 107 , 201dshare-based payment 201d ( sab no . 107 ) . the company made this change based on a number of factors , including the company 2019s execution of its strategic plans to sell non-core businesses , reduce leverage and refinance its debt , and its recent merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) management had previously based its volatility assumptions on historical volatility since inception , which included periods when the company 2019s capital structure was more highly leveraged than current levels and expected levels for the foreseeable future . management 2019s estimate of future volatility is based on its consideration of all available information , including historical volatility , implied volatility of publicly traded options , the company 2019s current capital structure and its publicly announced future business plans . for comparative purposes , a 10% ( 10 % ) change in the volatility assumption would change pro forma stock option expense and pro forma net loss by approximately $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . ( see note 14. ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per common share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 ( as amended ) to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : .
||2005|2004|2003|
|net loss as reported|$ -171590 ( 171590 )|$ -247587 ( 247587 )|$ -325321 ( 325321 )|
|add : stock-based employee compensation expense net of related tax effect included in net loss as reported|7104|2297|2077|
|less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related taxeffect|-22238 ( 22238 )|-23906 ( 23906 )|-31156 ( 31156 )|
|pro-forma net loss|$ -186724 ( 186724 )|$ -269196 ( 269196 )|$ -354400 ( 354400 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share as reported|$ -0.57 ( 0.57 )|$ -1.10 ( 1.10 )|$ -1.56 ( 1.56 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share pro-forma|$ -0.62 ( 0.62 )|$ -1.20 ( 1.20 )|$ -1.70 ( 1.70 )|
the company has modified certain option awards to revise vesting and exercise terms for certain terminated employees and recognized charges of $ 7.0 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 2.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . in addition , the stock-based employee compensation amounts above for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , include approximately $ 2.4 million of unearned compensation amortization related to unvested stock options assumed in the merger with spectrasite , inc . such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense with corresponding adjustments to additional paid-in capital and unearned compensation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas 123r , which supersedes apb no . 25 , and amends sfas no . 95 , 201cstatement of cash flows . 201d this statement addressed the accounting for share-based payments to employees , including grants of employee stock options . under the new standard .
Question: what was the percentage decrease in the pro-forma net loss
Answer: | -0.30636 |
FINQA3337 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: there were no changes in the company 2019s valuation techniques used to measure fair values on a recurring basis as a result of adopting asc 820 . pca had no assets or liabilities that were measured on a nonrecurring basis . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity on october 17 , 2007 , pca announced that its board of directors authorized a $ 150.0 million common stock repurchase program . there is no expiration date for the common stock repurchase program . through december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased 3818729 shares of common stock , with 3142600 shares repurchased during 2008 and 676129 shares repurchased during 2007 . all repurchased shares were retired prior to december 31 , 2008 . there were no shares repurchased in 2009 . as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 65.0 million of the $ 150.0 million authorization remained available for repurchase of the company 2019s common stock . 12 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital commitments of approximately $ 41.7 million and $ 43.0 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . in addition , commitments at december 31 , 2009 for the major energy optimization projects at its counce and valdosta mills totaled $ 156.3 million . lease obligations pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 91000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases with a duration of two to seven years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows: .
||( in thousands )|
|2010|$ 28162|
|2011|25181|
|2012|17338|
|2013|11557|
|2014|7742|
|thereafter|18072|
|total|$ 108052|
total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 41.3 million , $ 41.6 million and $ 39.8 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses . pca was obligated under capital leases covering buildings and machinery and equipment in the amount of $ 23.1 million and $ 23.7 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . during the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company entered into a capital lease relating to buildings and machinery , totaling $ 23.9 million , payable over 20 years . this capital lease amount is a non-cash transaction and , accordingly , has been excluded packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .
Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2011?
Answer: | 0.23305 |
FINQA3338 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: free cash flow conversion rate and total cash returned to shareholders as a percentage of free cash we believe these measures provide useful information to investors because they are important for assessing our efficiency in converting earnings to cash and returning cash to shareholders . the calculation of free cash flow conversion rate and net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate , its equivalent gaap measure , follows: .
|in millions|fiscal 2018|
|net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrolling interests asreported|$ 2163.0|
|provisional net tax benefit ( a )|$ -523.5 ( 523.5 )|
|mark-to-marketeffects net of tax ( b )|-22.1 ( 22.1 )|
|acquisition transaction and integration costs net of tax ( c )|58.5|
|restructuring costs net of tax ( d )|61.4|
|project-related costs net of tax ( d )|8.0|
|intangible asset impairments net of tax ( e )|64.9|
|tax adjustment ( a )|40.9|
|cpw restructuring costs net of tax|1.8|
|adjusted net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests|1852.9|
|net cash provided by operating activities|2841.0|
|purchases of land buildings and equipment|-622.7 ( 622.7 )|
|free cash flow|$ 2218.3|
|net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate|131% ( 131 % )|
|free cash flow conversion rate|120% ( 120 % )|
( a ) see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( b ) see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( c ) see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( d ) see note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( e ) see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . see our reconciliation below of the effective income tax rate as reported to the effective income tax rate excluding certain items affecting comparability for the tax impact of each item affecting comparability. .
Question: in 2018 what was the ratio of the net earnings to the net cash provided by operating activities
Answer: | 0.76135 |
FINQA3339 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: tax returns for 2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute . currently , unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months . 19 . stock-based and other management compensation plans in april 2009 , the company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the company 2019s 2004 stock incentive plan . the 2009 global incentive plan ( 201cgip 201d ) enables the compensation committee of the board of directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , shares of series a common stock , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and incentive bonuses ( which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof ) , any of which may be performance-based , with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to company employees ( including officers ) , non-management directors and other service providers . under the 2009 gip , the company no longer can grant rsus with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents . the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 gip is equal to 5350000 shares plus ( a ) any shares of series a common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock incentive plan ( 201csip 201d ) ( not including any shares of series a common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 sip or any shares of series a common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 sip ) and ( b ) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards ( other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares ) . as of december 31 , 2010 , total shares available for awards and total shares subject to outstanding awards are as follows : shares available for awards shares subject to outstanding awards .
||shares available for awards|shares subject to outstanding awards|
|2009 global incentive plan|2322450|2530454|
|2004 stock incentive plan|-|5923147|
upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company by reason of death or disability or by the company without cause ( as defined in the respective award agreements ) , an award in amount equal to ( i ) the value of the award granted multiplied by ( ii ) a fraction , ( x ) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination , and ( y ) the denominator of which is the term of the award , such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number , and reduced by ( iii ) the value of any award that previously vested , shall immediately vest and become payable to the participant . upon the termination of a participant 2019s employment with the company for any other reason , any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration . there was $ 19 million and $ 0 million of tax benefit realized from stock option exercises and vesting of rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during the year ended december 31 , 2008 the company reversed $ 8 million of the $ 19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . deferred compensation in april 2007 , certain participants in the company 2019s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program , which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units ( see restricted stock units below ) . based on participation in the revised program , the company expensed $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 8 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , related to the revised program and made payments of $ 4 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 to participants who left the company and $ 28 million to active employees during december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan . the company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d77691 pcn : 132000000 ***%%pcmsg|132 |00011|yes|no|02/09/2011 18:22|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what is the total number of shares subject to outstanding awards from both 2004 and 2009
Answer: | 8453601.0 |
FINQA3340 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , there was $ 8330000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the restricted stock awards . the company expects to recognize the cost of these stock awards over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years . 5 . accrued liabilities the components of accrued liabilities are as follows: .
|( in thousands )|december 31 , 2006|december 31 , 2005|
|bonuses and incentives|$ 29822|$ 21895|
|medical insurance and workers 2019 compensation|18279|18339|
|vacation and holiday pay|14742|14159|
|customer volume discounts and rebates|13777|13232|
|franchise and property taxes|8432|8539|
|payroll and payroll taxes|5465|4772|
|other|9913|5889|
|total|$ 100430|$ 86825|
6 . employee benefit plans and other postretirement benefits in connection with the acquisition from pactiv , pca and pactiv entered into a human resources agreement which , among other items , granted pca employees continued participation in the pactiv pension plan for a period of up to five years following the closing of the acquisition for an agreed upon fee . effective january 1 , 2003 , pca adopted a mirror-image pension plan for eligible hourly employees to succeed the pactiv pension plan in which pca hourly employees had participated though december 31 , 2002 . the pca pension plan for hourly employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through december 31 , 2002 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through december 31 , 2002 for hourly employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . effective may 1 , 2004 , pca adopted a grandfathered pension plan for certain salaried employees who had previously participated in the pactiv pension plan pursuant to the above mentioned human resource agreement . the benefit formula for the new pca pension plan for salaried employees is comparable to that of the pactiv plan except that the pca plan uses career average base pay in the benefit formula in lieu of final average base pay . the pca pension plan for salaried employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through april 30 , 2004 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through april 30 , 2004 for salaried employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . pca maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) , which augments pension benefits for eligible executives ( excluding the ceo ) earned under the pca pension plan for salaried employees . benefits are determined using the same formula as the pca pension plan but in addition to counting .
Question: what was the percentage change in payroll and payroll taxes from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: | 0.14522 |
FINQA3341 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values in the tables above . fixed-income securities 2014 devon 2019s fixed-income securities consist of u.s . treasury obligations , bonds issued by investment-grade companies from diverse industries , and asset-backed securities . these fixed-income securities are actively traded securities that can be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . devon 2019s fixed income securities also include commingled funds that primarily invest in long-term bonds and u.s . treasury securities . these fixed income securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . equity securities 2014 devon 2019s equity securities include a commingled global equity fund that invests in large , mid and small capitalization stocks across the world 2019s developed and emerging markets . these equity securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities consisted of investments in u.s . large and small capitalization companies and international large capitalization companies . these equity securities were actively traded securities that could be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities also included a commingled fund that invested in large capitalization companies . these equity securities could be redeemed on demand but were not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . other securities 2014 devon 2019s other securities include commingled , short-term investment funds . these securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by investment managers . devon 2019s hedge fund and alternative investments include an investment in an actively traded global mutual fund that focuses on alternative investment strategies and a hedge fund of funds that invests both long and short using a variety of investment strategies . devon 2019s hedge fund of funds is not actively traded and devon is subject to redemption restrictions with regards to this investment . the fair value of this level 3 investment represents the fair value as determined by the hedge fund manager . included below is a summary of the changes in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets ( in millions ) . .
|december 31 2009|$ 51|
|purchases|3|
|investment returns|4|
|december 31 2010|58|
|purchases|33|
|investment returns|-1 ( 1 )|
|december 31 2011|$ 90|
.
Question: what was the percentage change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2010 to 2011
Answer: | 0.55172 |
FINQA3342 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: .
||2014|2013|
|operating revenues|$ 13|$ 23|
|total operating expenses net|19|26|
|loss from discontinued operations before income taxes|-6 ( 6 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|provision ( benefit ) for income taxes|1|-1 ( 1 )|
|loss from discontinued operations net of tax|$ -7 ( 7 )|$ -2 ( 2 )|
the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: at what revenue multiple did awk purchase various regulated water and wastewater systems in 2014?
Answer: | 1.44444 |
FINQA3343 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: pipeline transportation 2013 we own a system of pipelines through marathon pipe line llc ( 201cmpl 201d ) and ohio river pipe line llc ( 201corpl 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiaries . our pipeline systems transport crude oil and refined products primarily in the midwest and gulf coast regions to our refineries , our terminals and other pipeline systems . our mpl and orpl wholly-owned and undivided interest common carrier systems consist of 1737 miles of crude oil lines and 1825 miles of refined product lines comprising 32 systems located in 11 states . the mpl common carrier pipeline network is one of the largest petroleum pipeline systems in the united states , based on total barrels delivered . our common carrier pipeline systems are subject to state and federal energy regulatory commission regulations and guidelines , including published tariffs for the transportation of crude oil and refined products . third parties generated 13 percent of the crude oil and refined product shipments on our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines in 2009 . our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines transported the volumes shown in the following table for each of the last three years . pipeline barrels handled ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|( thousands of barrels per day )|2009|2008|2007|
|crude oil trunk lines|1279|1405|1451|
|refined products trunk lines|953|960|1049|
|total|2232|2365|2500|
we also own 196 miles of private crude oil pipelines and 850 miles of private refined products pipelines , and we lease 217 miles of common carrier refined product pipelines . we have partial ownership interests in several pipeline companies that have approximately 780 miles of crude oil pipelines and 3600 miles of refined products pipelines , including about 970 miles operated by mpl . in addition , mpl operates most of our private pipelines and 985 miles of crude oil and 160 miles of natural gas pipelines owned by our e&p segment . our major refined product pipelines include the owned and operated cardinal products pipeline and the wabash pipeline . the cardinal products pipeline delivers refined products from kenova , west virginia , to columbus , ohio . the wabash pipeline system delivers product from robinson , illinois , to various terminals in the area of chicago , illinois . other significant refined product pipelines owned and operated by mpl extend from : robinson , illinois , to louisville , kentucky ; garyville , louisiana , to zachary , louisiana ; and texas city , texas , to pasadena , texas . in addition , as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following refined product pipelines : 2022 65 percent undivided ownership interest in the louisville-lexington system , a petroleum products pipeline system extending from louisville to lexington , kentucky ; 2022 60 percent interest in muskegon pipeline llc , which owns a refined products pipeline extending from griffith , indiana , to north muskegon , michigan ; 2022 50 percent interest in centennial pipeline llc , which owns a refined products system connecting the gulf coast region with the midwest market ; 2022 17 percent interest in explorer pipeline company , a refined products pipeline system extending from the gulf coast to the midwest ; and 2022 6 percent interest in wolverine pipe line company , a refined products pipeline system extending from chicago , illinois , to toledo , ohio . our major owned and operated crude oil lines run from : patoka , illinois , to catlettsburg , kentucky ; patoka , illinois , to robinson , illinois ; patoka , illinois , to lima , ohio ; lima , ohio to canton , ohio ; samaria , michigan , to detroit , michigan ; and st . james , louisiana , to garyville , louisiana . as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following crude oil pipelines : 2022 51 percent interest in loop llc , the owner and operator of loop , which is the only u.s . deepwater oil port , located 18 miles off the coast of louisiana , and a crude oil pipeline connecting the port facility to storage caverns and tanks at clovelly , louisiana ; 2022 59 percent interest in locap llc , which owns a crude oil pipeline connecting loop and the capline system; .
Question: what was the total refined products trunk lines production in tbd for the three year period?
Answer: | 2962.0 |
FINQA3344 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as the payments landscape evolves , we may increasingly face competition from emerging players in the payment space , many of which are non-financial institution networks that have departed from the more traditional 201cbank-centric 201d business model . the emergence of these potentially competitive networks has primarily been via the online channel with a focus on ecommerce and/or mobile technologies . paypal , google and isis are examples . these providers compete with visa directly in some cases , yet may also be significant partners and customers of visa . based on payments volume , total volume and number of transactions , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world . the following chart compares our network with those of our major general purpose payment network competitors for calendar year 2011 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3768 $ 6029 77.6 2011 .
|company|paymentsvolume ( billions )|totalvolume ( billions )|totaltransactions ( billions )|cards ( millions )|
|visa inc. ( 1 )|$ 3768|$ 6029|77.6|2011|
|mastercard|2430|3249|39.8|1059|
|american express|808|822|5.3|97|
|discover|114|122|1.9|59|
|jcb|160|166|1.4|77|
|diners club|28|29|0.2|6|
( 1 ) visa inc . figures as reported on form 8-k filed with the sec on february 8 and may 2 , 2012 , respectively . visa figures represent total volume , payments volume and cash volume , and the number of payments transactions , cash transactions , accounts and cards for products carrying the visa , visa electron and interlink brands . card counts include plus proprietary cards . payments volume represents the aggregate dollar amount of purchases made with cards carrying the visa , visa electron and interlink brands for the relevant period . total volume represents payments volume plus cash volume . the data presented is reported quarterly by visa 2019s clients on their operating certificates and is subject to verification by visa . on occasion , clients may update previously submitted information . sources : mastercard , american express , jcb and diners club data sourced from the nilson report issue 992 ( april 2012 ) . includes all consumer and commercial credit , debit and prepaid cards . some prior year figures have been restated . currency figures are in u.s . dollars . mastercard excludes maestro and cirrus figures . american express includes figures for third-party issuers . jcb figures include third-party issuers and other payment-related products . some figures are estimates . diners club figures are for the 12 months ended november 30 , 2011 . discover data sourced from the nilson report issue 986 ( january 2012 ) 2014u.s . data only and includes business from third-party issuers . for more information on the concentration of our operating revenues and other financial information , see item 8 2014financial statements and supplementary data 2014note 14 2014enterprise-wide disclosures and concentration of business included elsewhere in this report . working capital requirements payments settlement due from and due to issuing and acquiring clients represents a substantial daily working capital requirement . u.s . dollar settlements are typically settled within the same day and do not result in a receivable or payable balance , while settlement currencies other than the u.s . dollar generally remain outstanding for one to two business days , consistent with industry practice for such transactions. .
Question: what is the average payment per transaction of discover holders?
Answer: | 60.0 |
FINQA3345 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|3946111|$ 34.67|3608527|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )|2014|2014|2014|
|total|3946111|$ 34.67|3608527|
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total value of issued securities that are approved by security holders , in billions?
Answer: | 0.13681 |
FINQA3346 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 .
|( amounts in millions )|2013|2012|
|cash and cash equivalents|$ 217.6|$ 214.5|
|trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net|531.6|497.9|
|finance receivables 2013 net|374.6|323.1|
|contract receivables 2013 net|68.4|62.7|
|inventories 2013 net|434.4|404.2|
|other current assets|169.6|166.6|
|total current assets|1796.2|1669.0|
|notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt|-113.1 ( 113.1 )|-5.2 ( 5.2 )|
|accounts payable|-155.6 ( 155.6 )|-142.5 ( 142.5 )|
|other current liabilities|-446.7 ( 446.7 )|-441.5 ( 441.5 )|
|total current liabilities|-715.4 ( 715.4 )|-589.2 ( 589.2 )|
|working capital|$ 1080.8|$ 1079.8|
cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of cash and cash equivalents from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | 0.01445 |
FINQA3347 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|net income|$ 4372|$ 807|$ 3804|
|non-cash operating activities ( a )|3318|7313|4578|
|pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )|-212 ( 212 )|-917 ( 917 )|-1436 ( 1436 )|
|income tax receivables and payables|-155 ( 155 )|280|236|
|changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities|121|-148 ( 148 )|-12 ( 12 )|
|other operating activities|-140 ( 140 )|-119 ( 119 )|-97 ( 97 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 7304|$ 7216|$ 7073|
( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2011 to 2013 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2013 , compared with 2012 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by certain tnt express transaction-related charges , as well as changes in income tax receivables and payables . we paid a termination fee to tnt express of 20ac200 million ( $ 268 million ) under the agreement to terminate the merger protocol in the first quarter of 2013 . additionally , the cash payments for income taxes increased in 2013 compared with 2012 , and were impacted by the timing of current tax deductions . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2013 , we did not have any required , nor make any discretionary , contributions to our primary company-sponsored pension plans in the u.s . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2011 through 2013 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2013 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 4.665 billion . approximately 45%-55% ( 45%-55 % ) of cash and cash equivalents was held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the percentage change in net cash from operating activities from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | 0.0122 |
FINQA3348 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 118 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is used as an input for aggregating derivative credit risk exposures with loans and other credit risk . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and the cva , as further described below . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates cva to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative contracts , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative contracts . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the peak , dre and avg metrics . the three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2018 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as assigned by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables .
|rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )|rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral|rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral|exposure net of all collateral|% ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral|
|aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3|$ 11831|31% ( 31 % )|$ 11529|29% ( 29 % )|
|a+/a1 to a-/a3|7428|19|6919|17|
|bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3|12536|32|13925|34|
|bb+/ba1 to b-/b3|6373|16|7397|18|
|ccc+/caa1 and below|723|2|645|2|
|total|$ 38891|100% ( 100 % )|$ 40415|100% ( 100 % )|
as previously noted , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s over-the-counter derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements 2014 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily 2014 was approximately 90% ( 90 % ) at both december 31 , 2018 , and december 31 , 2017. .
Question: considering the year 2018 , what is the amount of money represented by all the class b derivatives , in millions of dollars?
Answer: | 21322.0 |
FINQA3349 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the table below sets forth information on our share repurchases and dividends paid in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . ( in billions ) share repurchases and dividends paid dividends paid share repurchases 20142013 2015 contractual obligations .
|as of december 31 2015 ( in millions )|payment due by period total|payment due by period year 1|payment due by period years 2-3|payment due by period years 4-5|payment due by period more than 5|
|debtobligations ( a )|$ 52727|$ 3597|$ 6842|$ 8482|$ 33806|
|capital lease obligations|156|30|47|39|40|
|operating lease obligations|3459|452|782|608|1617|
|purchaseobligations ( b )|53644|10848|10080|8537|24179|
|other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet ( c )|6280|590|1245|2390|2055|
|total ( d ) ( e )|$ 116266|$ 15517|$ 18996|$ 20056|$ 61697|
purchase obligations ( b ) 53644 10848 10080 8537 24179 other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet ( c ) 6280 590 1245 2390 2055 total ( d ) ( e ) $ 116266 $ 15517 $ 18996 $ 20056 $ 61697 refer to note 10 and note 17 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements . ( a ) excludes interest payments . ( b ) purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services that are legally binding on us and specify all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased and price provisions . our purchase obligations related to our cable communications segment include programming contracts with cable networks and local broadcast television stations ; contracts with customer premise equipment manufacturers , communications vendors and multichannel video providers for which we provide advertising sales representation ; and other contracts entered into in the normal course of business . cable communications programming contracts in the table above include amounts payable under fixed or minimum guaranteed commitments and do not represent the total fees that are expected to be paid under programming contracts , which we expect to be significantly higher because these contracts are generally based on the number of subscribers receiving the programming . our purchase obligations related to our nbcuniversal segments consist primarily of commitments to acquire film and television programming , including u.s . television rights to future olympic games through 2032 , sunday night football on the nbc network through the 2022-23 season , including the super bowl in 2018 and 2021 , nhl games through the 2020-21 season , spanish-language u.s . television rights to fifa world cup games through 2022 , u.s television rights to english premier league soccer games through the 2021-22 season , certain pga tour and other golf events through 2030 and certain nascar events through 2024 , as well as obligations under various creative talent and employment agreements , including obligations to actors , producers , television personalities and executives , and various other television commitments . purchase obligations do not include contracts with immaterial future commitments . ( c ) other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet consist primarily of subsidiary preferred shares ; deferred compensation obliga- tions ; and pension , postretirement and postemployment benefit obligations . a contractual obligation with a carrying value of $ 1.1 billion is not included in the table above because it is uncertain if the arrangement will be settled . the contractual obligation involves an interest held by a third party in the revenue of certain theme parks . the arrangement provides the counterparty with the right to periodic pay- ments associated with current period revenue and , beginning in 2017 , the option to require nbcuniversal to purchase the interest for cash in an amount based on a contractually specified formula , which amount could be significantly higher than our current carrying value . see note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information related to this arrangement . reserves for uncertain tax positions of $ 1.1 billion are not included in the table above because it is uncertain if and when these reserves will become payable . payments of $ 2.1 billion of participations and residuals are also not included in the table above because we cannot make a reliable esti- mate of the period in which these obligations will be settled . ( d ) our contractual obligations do not include the commitment to invest up to $ 4 billion at any one time as an investor in atairos due to our inability to estimate the timing of this funding . in addition , we do not include any future expenditures related to the construction and development of the proposed universal studios theme park in beijing , china as we are not currently obligated to make such funding . comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k 66 .
Question: what percent of total payments due in year 1 are due to debt obligations?
Answer: | 0.23181 |
FINQA3350 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2005 , we amended our $ 1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility to extend its maturity date from march 27 , 2008 to march 27 , 2010 , and reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) and the commitment fee to 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) of the undrawn portion of the facility at december 31 , 2005 . in addition , in 2005 , we entered into two $ 100.0 million unsecured term loans , due 2010 , at an effective interest rate of libor plus 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . during 2004 , we entered into an eight-year , $ 225.0 million unse- cured term loan , at libor plus 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) , which was amended in 2005 to reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . the liquid yield option 2122 notes and the zero coupon convertible notes are unsecured zero coupon bonds with yields to maturity of 4.875% ( 4.875 % ) and 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) , respectively , due 2021 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note was issued at a price of $ 381.63 and $ 391.06 , respectively , and will have a principal amount at maturity of $ 1000 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note is convertible at the option of the holder into 11.7152 and 15.6675 shares of common stock , respec- tively , if the market price of our common stock reaches certain lev- els . these conditions were met at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for the zero coupon convertible notes and at december 31 , 2004 for the liquid yield option 2122 notes . since february 2 , 2005 , we have the right to redeem the liquid yield option 2122 notes and commencing on may 18 , 2006 , we will have the right to redeem the zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted values for cash as a whole at any time , or from time to time in part . holders may require us to pur- chase any outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes at their accreted value on february 2 , 2011 and any outstanding zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted value on may 18 , 2009 and may 18 , 2014 . we may choose to pay the purchase price in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . during 2005 , holders of our liquid yield option 2122 notes and zero coupon convertible notes converted approximately $ 10.4 million and $ 285.0 million , respectively , of the accreted value of these notes into approximately 0.3 million and 9.4 million shares , respec- tively , of our common stock and cash for fractional shares . in addi- tion , we called for redemption $ 182.3 million of the accreted bal- ance of outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes . most holders of the liquid yield option 2122 notes elected to convert into shares of our common stock , rather than redeem for cash , resulting in the issuance of approximately 4.5 million shares . during 2005 , we prepaid a total of $ 297.0 million on a term loan secured by a certain celebrity ship and on a variable rate unsecured term loan . in 1996 , we entered into a $ 264.0 million capital lease to finance splendour of the seas and in 1995 we entered into a $ 260.0 million capital lease to finance legend of the seas . during 2005 , we paid $ 335.8 million in connection with the exercise of purchase options on these capital lease obligations . under certain of our agreements , the contractual interest rate and commitment fee vary with our debt rating . the unsecured senior notes and senior debentures are not redeemable prior to maturity . our debt agreements contain covenants that require us , among other things , to maintain minimum net worth and fixed charge cov- erage ratio and limit our debt to capital ratio . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 31 , 2005 . following is a schedule of annual maturities on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : .
|2006|$ 600883|
|2007|329493|
|2008|245257|
|2009 ( 1 )|361449|
|2010|687376|
1 the $ 137.9 million accreted value of the zero coupon convertible notes at december 31 , 2005 is included in year 2009 . the holders of our zero coupon convertible notes may require us to purchase any notes outstanding at an accreted value of $ 161.7 mil- lion on may 18 , 2009 . this accreted value was calculated based on the number of notes outstanding at december 31 , 2005 . we may choose to pay any amounts in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . note 6 . shareholders 2019 equity on september 25 , 2005 , we announced that we and an investment bank had finalized a forward sale agreement relating to an asr transaction . as part of the asr transaction , we purchased 5.5 million shares of our common stock from the investment bank at an initial price of $ 45.40 per share . total consideration paid to repurchase such shares , including commissions and other fees , was approxi- mately $ 249.1 million and was recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock . the forward sale contract matured in february 2006 . during the term of the forward sale contract , the investment bank purchased shares of our common stock in the open market to settle its obliga- tion related to the shares borrowed from third parties and sold to us . upon settlement of the contract , we received 218089 additional shares of our common stock . these incremental shares will be recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock in the first quarter of 2006 . our employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) , which has been in effect since january 1 , 1994 , facilitates the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the pur- chase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the pur- chase period and the last business day of each month of the pur- chase period . shares of common stock of 14476 , 13281 and 21280 38 royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what was the ratio of the leases for splendour and legend of the seas in 1996 and 1995
Answer: | 1.01538 |
FINQA3351 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .
|in millions|2009|2008|2007|
|sales|$ 8890|$ 7690|$ 5245|
|operating profit|761|390|374|
north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the increase in industrial packaging sales between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: | 1200.0 |
FINQA3352 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs .
||level 3|
|balance as of january 1 2018|$ 278|
|actual return on assets|-23 ( 23 )|
|purchases issuances and settlements net|-25 ( 25 )|
|balance as of december 31 2018|$ 230|
balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .
Question: what was the change in value for level 3 inputs during 2018?\\n
Answer: | -48.0 |
FINQA3353 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .
|measurement pointdecember 31|the priceline group inc .|nasdaqcomposite index|s&p 500index|rdg internetcomposite|
|2010|100.00|100.00|100.00|100.00|
|2011|117.06|100.53|102.11|102.11|
|2012|155.27|116.92|118.45|122.23|
|2013|290.93|166.19|156.82|199.42|
|2014|285.37|188.78|178.29|195.42|
|2015|319.10|199.95|180.75|267.25|
.
Question: what was the difference in percentage change between the priceline group inc . and the nasdaq composite index for the five years ended 2015?
Answer: | 1.1915 |
FINQA3354 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 46 : allowance for loan and lease losses .
|dollars in millions|2013|2012|
|january 1|$ 4036|$ 4347|
|total net charge-offs|-1077 ( 1077 )|-1289 ( 1289 )|
|provision for credit losses|643|987|
|net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit|8|-10 ( 10 )|
|other|-1 ( 1 )|1|
|december 31|$ 3609|$ 4036|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended ) ( a )|.57% ( .57 % )|.73% ( .73 % )|
|allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans|1.84|2.17|
|commercial lending net charge-offs|$ -249 ( 249 )|$ -359 ( 359 )|
|consumer lending net charge-offs|-828 ( 828 )|-930 ( 930 )|
|total net charge-offs|$ -1077 ( 1077 )|$ -1289 ( 1289 )|
|net charge-offs to average loans ( for the year ended )|||
|commercial lending|.22% ( .22 % )|.35% ( .35 % )|
|consumer lending ( a )|1.07|1.24|
( a ) includes charge-offs of $ 134 million taken pursuant to alignment with interagency guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending in the first quarter of 2013 . the provision for credit losses totaled $ 643 million for 2013 compared to $ 987 million for 2012 . the primary driver of the decrease to the provision was improved overall credit quality , including improved commercial loan risk factors , lower consumer loan delinquencies and improvements in expected cash flows for our purchased impaired loans . for 2013 , the provision for commercial lending credit losses decreased by $ 102 million , or 74% ( 74 % ) , from 2012 . the provision for consumer lending credit losses decreased $ 242 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) , from 2012 . at december 31 , 2013 , total alll to total nonperforming loans was 117% ( 117 % ) . the comparable amount for december 31 , 2012 was 124% ( 124 % ) . these ratios are 72% ( 72 % ) and 79% ( 79 % ) , respectively , when excluding the $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of alll at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 allocated to consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by residential real estate and purchased impaired loans . we have excluded consumer loans and lines of credit not secured by real estate as they are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and not placed on nonperforming status . additionally , we have excluded purchased impaired loans as they are considered performing regardless of their delinquency status as interest is accreted based on our estimate of expected cash flows and additional allowance is recorded when these cash flows are below recorded investment . see table 35 within this credit risk management section for additional information . the alll balance increases or decreases across periods in relation to fluctuating risk factors , including asset quality trends , charge-offs and changes in aggregate portfolio balances . during 2013 , improving asset quality trends , including , but not limited to , delinquency status and improving economic conditions , realization of previously estimated losses through charge-offs , including the impact of alignment with interagency guidance and overall portfolio growth , combined to result in the alll balance declining $ .4 billion , or 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . see note 7 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit and note 6 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report regarding changes in the alll and in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit . operational risk management operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems , human factors , or external events . this includes losses that may arise as a result of non- compliance with laws or regulations , failure to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities , as well as litigation or other legal actions . operational risk may occur in any of our business activities and manifests itself in various ways , including but not limited to : 2022 transaction processing errors , 2022 unauthorized transactions and fraud by employees or third parties , 2022 material disruption in business activities , 2022 system breaches and misuse of sensitive information , 2022 regulatory or governmental actions , fines or penalties , and 2022 significant legal expenses , judgments or settlements . pnc 2019s operational risk management is inclusive of technology risk management , compliance and business continuity risk . operational risk management focuses on balancing business needs , regulatory expectations and risk management priorities through an adaptive and proactive program that is designed to provide a strong governance model , sound and consistent risk management processes and transparent operational risk reporting across the enterprise . the pnc board determines the strategic approach to operational risk via establishment of the operational risk appetite and appropriate risk management structure . this includes establishment of risk metrics and limits and a reporting structure to identify , understand and manage operational risks . executive management has responsibility for operational risk management . the executive management team is responsible for monitoring significant risks , key controls and related issues through management reporting and a governance structure of risk committees and sub-committees . within risk management , operational risk management functions are responsible for developing and maintaining the 84 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for loan and lease losses from 2012 to 2013
Answer: | -0.1058 |
FINQA3355 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : .
||2014|2013|
|indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names|$ 214112|$ 204866|
|foreign currency translation adjustment|-26074 ( 26074 )|9246|
|total|$ 188038|$ 214112|
during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: from 2013-2014 , what percentage of total intangible assets were recorded in 2014?
Answer: | 46.75817 |
FINQA3356 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for marketing . there are several methods that can be used to determine the estimated fair value of the ipr&d acquired in a business combination . we utilized the 201cincome method , 201d which applies a probability weighting to the estimated future net cash fl ows that are derived from projected sales revenues and estimated costs . these projec- tions are based on factors such as relevant market size , patent protection , historical pricing of similar products , and expected industry trends . the estimated future net cash fl ows are then discounted to the present value using an appropriate discount rate . this analysis is performed for each project independently . in accordance with fin 4 , applicability of fasb statement no . 2 to business combinations accounted for by the purchase method , these acquired ipr&d intangible assets totaling $ 4.71 billion and $ 340.5 million in 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were expensed immediately subsequent to the acquisition because the products had no alternative future use . the ongoing activities with respect to each of these products in development are not material to our research and development expenses . in addition to the acquisitions of businesses , we also acquired several products in development . the acquired ipr&d related to these products of $ 122.0 million and $ 405.1 million in 2008 and 2007 , respectively , was also writ- ten off by a charge to income immediately upon acquisition because the products had no alternative future use . imclone acquisition on november 24 , 2008 , we acquired all of the outstanding shares of imclone systems inc . ( imclone ) , a biopharma- ceutical company focused on advancing oncology care , for a total purchase price of approximately $ 6.5 billion , which was fi nanced through borrowings . this strategic combination will offer both targeted therapies and oncolytic agents along with a pipeline spanning all phases of clinical development . the combination also expands our bio- technology capabilities . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 419.5 million . no portion of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . allocation of purchase price we are currently determining the fair values of a signifi cant portion of these net assets . the purchase price has been preliminarily allocated based on an estimate of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . the fi nal determination of these fair values will be completed as soon as possible but no later than one year from the acquisition date . although the fi nal determination may result in asset and liability fair values that are different than the preliminary estimates of these amounts included herein , it is not expected that those differences will be material to our fi nancial results . estimated fair value at november 24 , 2008 .
|cash and short-term investments|$ 982.9|
|inventories|136.2|
|developed product technology ( erbitux ) 1|1057.9|
|goodwill|419.5|
|property and equipment|339.8|
|debt assumed|-600.0 ( 600.0 )|
|deferred taxes|-315.0 ( 315.0 )|
|deferred income|-127.7 ( 127.7 )|
|other assets and liabilities 2014 net|-72.1 ( 72.1 )|
|acquired in-process research and development|4685.4|
|total purchase price|$ 6506.9|
1this intangible asset will be amortized on a straight-line basis through 2023 in the u.s . and 2018 in the rest of the world . all of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d is attributable to oncology-related products in develop- ment , including $ 1.33 billion to line extensions for erbitux . a signifi cant portion ( 81 percent ) of the remaining value of acquired ipr&d is attributable to two compounds in phase iii clinical testing and one compound in phase ii clini- cal testing , all targeted to treat various forms of cancers . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 13.5 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 4.69 billion recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 , was not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma financial information the following unaudited pro forma fi nancial information presents the combined results of our operations with .
Question: what i the yearly amortization expense related to developed product technology?
Answer: | 70.52667 |
FINQA3357 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: .
|( $ in millions )|payments due by period ( a ) total|payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year|payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years|payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years|payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years|
|long-term debt|$ 2301.6|$ 38.5|$ 278.4|$ 972.9|$ 1011.8|
|capital lease obligations|7.6|2.7|2.4|0.4|2.1|
|interest payments on long-term debt ( b )|826.5|138.8|259.4|204.8|223.5|
|operating leases|185.9|45.0|58.5|38.7|43.7|
|purchase obligations ( c )|7450.4|2682.5|3169.4|1524.6|73.9|
|total payments on contractual obligations|$ 10772.0|$ 2907.5|$ 3768.1|$ 2741.4|$ 1355.0|
total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .
Question: what percentage of total payments on contractual obligations are due to interest payments on long-term debt at december 301 , 2006?
Answer: | 0.07673 |
FINQA3358 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2016|2015|2014|
|net sales|$ 9409|$ 9105|$ 9202|
|operating profit|1289|1171|1187|
|operating margin|13.7% ( 13.7 % )|12.9% ( 12.9 % )|12.9% ( 12.9 % )|
|backlog atyear-end|$ 18900|$ 17400|$ 20300|
2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what were average net sales for space systems in millions between 2014 and 2016?
Answer: | 9238.66667 |
FINQA3359 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: research and development we are committed to investing in highly productive research and development capabilities , particularly in electro-mechanical systems . our research and development ( "r&d" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we concentrate on developing technology innovations that will deliver growth through the introduction of new products and solutions , and also on driving continuous improvements in product cost , quality , safety and sustainability . we manage our r&d team as a global group with an emphasis on a global collaborative approach to identify and develop new technologies and worldwide product platforms . we are organized on a regional basis to leverage expertise in local standards and configurations . in addition to regional engineering centers in each geographic region , we also operate a global engineering center of excellence in bangalore , india . seasonality our business experiences seasonality that varies by product line . because more construction and do-it-yourself projects occur during the second and third calendar quarters of each year in the northern hemisphere , our security product sales , typically , are higher in those quarters than in the first and fourth calendar quarters . however , our interflex business typically experiences higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to project timing . revenue by quarter for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are as follows: .
||first quarter|second quarter|third quarter|fourth quarter|
|2017|23% ( 23 % )|26% ( 26 % )|25% ( 25 % )|26% ( 26 % )|
|2016|22% ( 22 % )|26% ( 26 % )|26% ( 26 % )|26% ( 26 % )|
|2015|22% ( 22 % )|25% ( 25 % )|26% ( 26 % )|27% ( 27 % )|
employees we currently have approximately 10000 employees . environmental regulation we have a dedicated environmental program that is designed to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process as well as to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , we are currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . we are sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and have received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency ( the "epa" ) and similar state authorities . we have also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( "prp" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , our involvement is minimal . in estimating our liability , we have assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . we incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . of these amounts $ 8.9 million and $ 9.6 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain. .
Question: considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the increase observed in the research and development expenditures?
Answer: | 0.02114 |
FINQA3360 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|627|
|revisions of previous estimates|1|
|improved recovery|1|
|purchases of reserves in place|4|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|227|
|dispositions|-29 ( 29 )|
|transfers to proved developed|-103 ( 103 )|
|end of year|728|
significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were total costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , in millions?
Answer: | 7680.0 |
FINQA3361 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund managers . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) and we are able to redeem our investment in the near-term . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized at level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers , or the investment manager . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are valued using the nav based on valuation models of underlying securities which generally include significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners may use various valuation methodologies , including the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . hedge funds are valued by independent administrators using various pricing sources and models based on the nature of the securities . private equity funds , real estate funds , and hedge funds are generally categorized as level 3 as we cannot fully redeem our investment in the near-term . commodities are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 2.25 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we currently plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.0 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2014 . in 2013 , we made contributions of $ 98 million to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we do not expect to make contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2014 as a result of our 2013 contributions . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019 - 2023|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 1960|$ 2030|$ 2110|$ 2200|$ 2300|$ 13240|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|200|210|210|220|220|1070|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 383 million in 2013 , $ 380 million in 2012 , and $ 378 million in 2011 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 44.7 million and 48.6 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012. .
Question: as of 2013 what was the ratio of the estimated future benefit payments after 2019 to the amounts in 2014
Answer: | 6.7551 |
FINQA3362 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) equity awards was $ 30333 , $ 20726 and $ 19828 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the income tax benefit related to options exercised during 2009 was $ 7545 . the additional paid-in capital balance attributed to the equity awards was $ 197350 , $ 135538 and $ 114637 as of december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . on july 18 , 2006 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the mastercard incorporated 2006 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( the 201cdirector plan 201d ) . the director plan provides for awards of deferred stock units ( 201cdsus 201d ) to each director of the company who is not a current employee of the company . there are 100 shares of class a common stock reserved for dsu awards under the director plan . during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , the company granted 7 dsus , 4 dsus and 8 dsus , respectively . the fair value of the dsus was based on the closing stock price on the new york stock exchange of the company 2019s class a common stock on the date of grant . the weighted average grant-date fair value of dsus granted during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 168.18 , $ 284.92 and $ 139.27 , respectively . the dsus vested immediately upon grant and will be settled in shares of the company 2019s class a common stock on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant . accordingly , the company recorded general and administrative expense of $ 1151 , $ 1209 and $ 1051 for the dsus for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for dsus was $ 410 , $ 371 and $ 413 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 18 . commitments at december 31 , 2009 , the company had the following future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements : capital leases operating leases sponsorship , licensing & .
||total|capital leases|operating leases|sponsorship licensing & other|
|2010|$ 283987|$ 7260|$ 25978|$ 250749|
|2011|146147|4455|17710|123982|
|2012|108377|3221|15358|89798|
|2013|59947|36838|10281|12828|
|2014|13998|2014|8371|5627|
|thereafter|25579|2014|22859|2720|
|total|$ 638035|$ 51774|$ 100557|$ 485704|
included in the table above are capital leases with imputed interest expense of $ 7929 and a net present value of minimum lease payments of $ 43845 . in addition , at december 31 , 2009 , $ 63616 of the future minimum payments in the table above for leases , sponsorship , licensing and other agreements was accrued . consolidated rental expense for the company 2019s office space , which is recognized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease , was approximately $ 39586 , $ 42905 and $ 35614 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . consolidated lease expense for automobiles , computer equipment and office equipment was $ 9137 , $ 7694 and $ 7679 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in january 2003 , mastercard purchased a building in kansas city , missouri for approximately $ 23572 . the building is a co-processing data center which replaced a back-up data center in lake success , new york . during 2003 , mastercard entered into agreements with the city of kansas city for ( i ) the sale-leaseback of the building and related equipment which totaled $ 36382 and ( ii ) the purchase of municipal bonds for the same amount .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the operating leases future minimum payments due under non-cancelable agreements to the total $ 7260 $
Answer: | 0.09148 |
FINQA3363 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , options for 5 million and 6 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 55.42 and $ 56.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $ .1 billion during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .1 billion and $ .2 billion , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans was insignificant for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were approximately 39 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under all equity compensation plans totaled approximately 40 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . during 2016 , we issued approximately 2 million common shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . additionally , certain incentive/ performance unit awards require subsequent adjustment to their current market value due to certain discretionary risk review triggers . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 78.37 , $ 91.57 and $ 80.79 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .2 billion and $ .1 billion , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 78 : nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards 2013 rollforward ( a ) shares in millions nonvested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted share/ restricted weighted- average grant date fair value .
|shares in millions december 31 2015|nonvested incentive/ performance units shares 2|weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.27|nonvested restricted share/ restricted share units 3|weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.26|
|granted ( b )|1|$ 77.77|1|$ 78.71|
|vested/released ( b )|-1 ( 1 )|$ 71.59|-1 ( 1 )|$ 65.53|
|december 31 2016|2|$ 81.42|3|$ 83.27|
( a ) forfeited awards during 2016 were insignificant . ( b ) includes adjustments for achieving specific performance goals for incentive/ performance unit share awards granted in prior periods . in table 78 , the units and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance unit share awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash if and when the underlying shares are issued to the participants . blackrock long-term incentive plans ( ltip ) blackrock adopted the 2002 ltip program to help attract and retain qualified professionals . at that time , we agreed to transfer up to four million shares of blackrock common stock to fund a portion of the 2002 ltip program and future ltip programs approved by blackrock 2019s board of directors . in 2009 , our obligation to deliver any remaining blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s series c preferred stock held by us . in 2016 , we transferred .5 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock to blackrock in connection with our obligation . at december 31 , 2016 , we held approximately .8 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock which were available to fund our obligations . see note 23 subsequent events for information on our february 1 , 2017 transfer of .5 million shares of the series c preferred stock to blackrock to satisfy a portion of our ltip obligation . we account for our blackrock series c preferred stock at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock . see note 6 fair value for additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 139 .
Question: was the total 2016 non-vested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average grant date fair value greater than the non-vested restricted share/ restricted share units weighted average grant date value?
Answer: | no |
FINQA3364 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: on-balance sheet securitizations the company engages in on-balance sheet securitizations . these are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment ; thus , the assets remain on the company 2019s balance sheet . the following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets and liabilities transferred in transactions from the consumer credit card , student loan , mortgage and auto businesses , accounted for as secured borrowings : in billions of dollars december 31 , december 31 .
|in billions of dollars|december 31 2008|december 31 2007|
|cash|$ 0.3|$ 0.1|
|available-for-sale securities|0.1|0.2|
|loans|7.5|7.4|
|allowance for loan losses|-0.1 ( 0.1 )|-0.1 ( 0.1 )|
|total assets|$ 7.8|$ 7.6|
|long-term debt|$ 6.3|$ 5.8|
|other liabilities|0.3|0.4|
|total liabilities|$ 6.6|$ 6.2|
all assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral . the cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities , which are non-recourse to the company 2019s general assets . citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits the company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits , and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties . the multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the company 2019s customers access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets . the conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customers and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors . the conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the company . the funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the company and by certain third parties . as administrator to the conduits , the company is responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits , making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits , including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued , monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits 2019 assets , and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits . in return , the company earns structuring fees from clients for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit , which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees . this administration fee is fairly stable , since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customers and , once the asset pricing is negotiated , most ongoing income , costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit 2019s size . the conduits administered by the company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties . the assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit , rather than actively traded and sold . the yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit , thus passing interest rate risk to the client . each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party seller , including over- collateralization , cash and excess spread collateral accounts , direct recourse or third-party guarantees . these credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of a or above , based on the company 2019s internal risk ratings . substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short- term commercial paper . as of december 31 , 2008 , the weighted average life of the commercial paper issued was approximately 37 days . in addition , the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $ 80 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from six months to seven years . the primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above . in addition , there are two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets . first , the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount . it is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit , thereby making the single investor in the subordinate loss note the primary beneficiary under fin 46 ( r ) . second , each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the company , which is generally 8-10% ( 8-10 % ) of the conduit 2019s assets . the letters of credit provided by the company total approximately $ 5.8 billion and are included in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . the net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the company is that , in the event of defaulted assets in excess of the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above , any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order : 2022 subordinate loss note holders 2022 the company 2022 the commercial paper investors the company , along with third parties , also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption , among other events . each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement ( apa ) . under the apa , the company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par . any assets purchased under the apa are subject to increased pricing . the apa is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit , as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk . the apa covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . in addition , the company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments . under these commitments , the company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market , subject to specified conditions . the total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement is $ 11.3 billion and is considered in the company 2019s maximum exposure to loss . the company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms. .
Question: what was the percentage increase in the total assets from 2007 to 2008
Answer: | 0.02632 |
FINQA3365 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: .
|( in days )|december 31 , 2015|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2013|
|days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )|48|42|44|
|days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )|13|13|14|
|days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )|-40 ( 40 )|-34 ( 34 )|-35 ( 35 )|
|cash conversion cycle|21|21|23|
( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .
Question: what was the three year average cash conversion cycle in days?
Answer: | 21.66667 |
FINQA3366 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 12 2013 stock-based compensation during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 189 million , $ 167 million , and $ 157 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated costs on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 122 million , $ 108 million , and $ 101 million . as of december 31 , 2013 , we had $ 132 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 827 million , $ 440 million , and $ 116 million during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 were reduced by $ 158 million , $ 96 million , and $ 56 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) , or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant , and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control , or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 20.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2013 , 4.7 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2013 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share .
||number of rsus ( in thousands )|weighted average grant-date fair value pershare|
|nonvested at december 31 2012|4822|$ 79.10|
|granted|1356|89.24|
|vested|-2093 ( 2093 )|79.26|
|forfeited|-226 ( 226 )|81.74|
|nonvested at december 31 2013|3859|$ 82.42|
rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period , however , the shares are not issued , and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period . stock options we generally recognize compensation cost for stock options ratably over the three-year vesting period . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , there were 10.2 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.65 ) and 20.6 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 83.15 ) stock options outstanding . stock options outstanding at december 31 , 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately five years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 663 million , and we expect nearly all of these stock options to vest . of the stock options outstanding , 7.7 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 84.37 ) have vested as of december 31 , 2013 and those stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately four years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 497 million . there were 10.1 million ( weighted average exercise price of $ 82.72 ) stock options exercised during 2013 . we did not grant stock options to employees during 2013. .
Question: in 2013 what was the percentage change in the nonvested rsus
Answer: | -0.19971 |
FINQA3367 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 included $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases .
|millions of dollars|operatingleases|capital leases|
|2010|$ 576|$ 290|
|2011|570|292|
|2012|488|247|
|2013|425|256|
|2014|352|267|
|later years|2901|1623|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 5312|$ 2975|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-914 ( 914 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 2061|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 686 million in 2009 , $ 747 million in 2008 , and $ 810 million in 2007 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at .
Question: what portion of 2009 capital leases are current liabilities?
Answer: | 0.17868 |
FINQA3368 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: properties 51vornado realty trust industrial properties our dry warehouse/industrial properties consist of seven buildings in new jersey containing approximately 1.5 million square feet . the properties are encumbered by two cross-collateralized mortgage loans aggregating $ 47179000 as of december 31 , 2006 . average lease terms range from three to five years . the following table sets forth the occupancy rate and average annual rent per square foot at the end of each of the past five years . average annual occupancy rent per as of december 31 , rate square foot .
|as of december 31,|occupancy rate|average annual rent per square foot|
|2006|96.9% ( 96.9 % )|$ 4.17|
|2005|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|4.19|
|2004|88.0% ( 88.0 % )|3.96|
|2003|88.0% ( 88.0 % )|3.86|
|2002|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|3.89|
220 central park south , new york city we own a 90% ( 90 % ) interest in 220 central park south . the property contains 122 rental apartments with an aggregate of 133000 square feet and 5700 square feet of commercial space . on november 7 , 2006 , we completed a $ 130000000 refinancing of the property . the loan has two tranches : the first tranche of $ 95000000 bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.35% ( 2.35 % ) ( 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) and the second tranche can be drawn up to $ 35000000 and bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.45% ( 2.45 % ) ( 7.80% ( 7.80 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , approximately $ 27990000 has been drawn on the second tranche . 40 east 66th street , new york city 40 east 66th street , located at madison avenue and east 66th street , contains 37 rental apartments with an aggregate of 85000 square feet , and 10000 square feet of retail space . the rental apartment operations are included in our other segment and the retail operations are included in the retail segment. .
Question: for the 2006 refinancing , as of december 31 , 2006 , approximately what percentage as been drawn on the second tranche?
Answer: | 0.79971 |
FINQA3369 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .
|2010|$ 18181|
|2011|27090|
|2012|21548|
|2013|25513|
|2014|24002|
|2015-2019|128494|
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013?
Answer: | 0.18401 |
FINQA3370 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: pricing the loans . when available , valuation assumptions included observable inputs based on whole loan sales . adjustments are made to these assumptions to account for situations when uncertainties exist , including market conditions and liquidity . credit risk is included as part of our valuation process for these loans by considering expected rates of return for market participants for similar loans in the marketplace . based on the significance of unobservable inputs , we classify this portfolio as level 3 . equity investments the valuation of direct and indirect private equity investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices , inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such investments . the carrying values of direct and affiliated partnership interests reflect the expected exit price and are based on various techniques including publicly traded price , multiples of adjusted earnings of the entity , independent appraisals , anticipated financing and sale transactions with third parties , or the pricing used to value the entity in a recent financing transaction . in september 2009 , the fasb issued asu 2009-12 2013 fair value measurements and disclosures ( topic 820 ) 2013 investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share ( or its equivalent ) . based on the guidance , we value indirect investments in private equity funds based on net asset value as provided in the financial statements that we receive from their managers . due to the time lag in our receipt of the financial information and based on a review of investments and valuation techniques applied , adjustments to the manager-provided value are made when available recent portfolio company information or market information indicates a significant change in value from that provided by the manager of the fund . these investments are classified as level 3 . customer resale agreements we account for structured resale agreements , which are economically hedged using free-standing financial derivatives , at fair value . the fair value for structured resale agreements is determined using a model which includes observable market data such as interest rates as inputs . readily observable market inputs to this model can be validated to external sources , including yield curves , implied volatility or other market-related data . these instruments are classified as level 2 . blackrock series c preferred stock effective february 27 , 2009 , we elected to account for the approximately 2.9 million shares of the blackrock series c preferred stock received in a stock exchange with blackrock at fair value . the series c preferred stock economically hedges the blackrock ltip liability that is accounted for as a derivative . the fair value of the series c preferred stock is determined using a third-party modeling approach , which includes both observable and unobservable inputs . this approach considers expectations of a default/liquidation event and the use of liquidity discounts based on our inability to sell the security at a fair , open market price in a timely manner . due to the significance of unobservable inputs , this security is classified as level 3 . level 3 assets and liabilities financial instruments are considered level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models , discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable . level 3 assets and liabilities dollars in millions level 3 assets level 3 liabilities % ( % ) of total assets at fair value % ( % ) of total liabilities at fair value consolidated assets consolidated liabilities .
|dollars in millions|total level 3 assets|total level 3 liabilities|% ( % ) of total assets at fair value|% ( % ) of total liabilities at fair value|% ( % ) of consolidated assets|% ( % ) of consolidated liabilities||
|december 31 2009|$ 14151|$ 295|22% ( 22 % )|6% ( 6 % )|5% ( 5 % )|< 1|% ( % )|
|december 31 2008|7012|22|19% ( 19 % )|< 1% ( 1 % )|2% ( 2 % )|< 1% ( 1 % )||
during 2009 , securities transferred into level 3 from level 2 exceeded securities transferred out by $ 4.4 billion . total securities measured at fair value and classified in level 3 at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 included securities available for sale and trading securities consisting primarily of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and asset- backed securities where management determined that the volume and level of activity for these assets had significantly decreased . there have been no recent new 201cprivate label 201d issues in the residential mortgage-backed securities market . the lack of relevant market activity for these securities resulted in management modifying its valuation methodology for the instruments transferred in 2009 . other level 3 assets include certain commercial mortgage loans held for sale , certain equity securities , auction rate securities , corporate debt securities , private equity investments , residential mortgage servicing rights and other assets. .
Question: how much more , in millions , are the total level 3 assets than the level 3 liabilities for year ended dec 31 , 2009?
Answer: | 13856.0 |
FINQA3371 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : .
|2016|$ 976|
|2017|2014|
|2018|875|
|2019|1100|
|2020|414|
|thereafter|9763|
|total|$ 13128|
credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the percent of the debt maturities scheduled to mature in 2016
Answer: | 0.07434 |
FINQA3372 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: sl green realty corp . it happens here 2012 annual report 85 | 85 in april a02011 , we purchased sitq immobilier , a subsid- iary of caisse de depot et placement du quebec , or sitq 2019s , 31.5% ( 31.5 % ) economic interest in 1515 a0 broadway , thereby consoli- dating full ownership of the 1750000 a0square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at $ 1.23 a0 billion . this valuation was based on a negotiated sales agreement and took into consideration such factors as whether this was a distressed sale and whether a minority dis- count was warranted . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 458.8 a0million mortgage encumbering the property . we rec- ognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $ 475.1 a0mil- lion upon the closing of this transaction . this property , which we initially acquired in may a02002 , was previously accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures . in january a0 2011 , we purchased city investment fund , or cif 2019s , 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) a0interest in 521 a0fifth avenue , thereby assum- ing full ownership of the 460000 a0 square foot ( unaudited ) building . the transaction valued the consolidated interests at approximately $ 245.7 a0 million , excluding $ 4.5 a0 million of cash and other assets acquired . we acquired the interest subject to the $ 140.0 a0 million mortgage encumbering the property . we recognized a purchase price fair value adjust- ment of $ 13.8 a0million upon the closing of this transaction . in april a02011 , we refinanced the property with a new $ 150.0 a0mil- lion 2-year mortgage which carries a floating rate of interest of 200 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . in connection with that refinancing , we acquired the fee interest in the property for $ 15.0 a0million . the following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2011 acquisitions ( amounts in thousands ) : 51 east 180 110 east 1515 521 fifth 42nd street maiden lane 42nd street broadway avenue land fffd$ 44095 $ 191523 $ 34000 $ 2002 2008462700 $ 110100 .
||51 east 42nd street|180 maiden lane|110 east 42nd street|1515 broadway|521 fifth avenue|
|land|$ 44095|$ 191523|$ 34000|$ 462700|$ 110100|
|building|33470|233230|46411|707938|146686|
|above market lease value|5616|7944|823|18298|3318|
|acquired in-place leases|4333|29948|5396|98661|23016|
|other assets net of other liabilities|2014|2014|2014|27127|2014|
|assets acquired|87514|462645|86630|1314724|283120|
|fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable|2014|2014|2014|-3693 ( 3693 )|2014|
|below market lease value|7514|20320|2326|84417|25977|
|liabilities assumed|7514|20320|2326|80724|25977|
|purchase price allocation|$ 80000|$ 442325|$ 84304|$ 1234000|$ 257143|
|net consideration funded by us at closing|$ 81632|$ 81835|$ 2744|$ 259228|$ 70000|
|equity and/or debt investment held|2014|2014|$ 16000|$ 40942|$ 41432|
|debt assumed|$ 2014|$ 2014|$ 65000|$ 458767|$ 140000|
net consideration funded by us at closing fffd$ 81632 $ 200281835 $ 20022744 $ 2002 2008259228 $ 200270000 equity and/or debt investment held fffd 2014 2014 $ 16000 $ 2002 2002 200840942 $ 200241432 debt assumed fffd$ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2008 2014 $ 65000 $ 2002 2008458767 $ 140000 2010 acquisitions | in january 2010 , we became the sole owner of 100 a0church street , a 1.05 a0million square foot ( unau- dited ) office tower located in downtown manhattan , following the successful foreclosure of the senior mezzanine loan at the property . our initial investment totaled $ 40.9 a0million , which was comprised of a 50% ( 50 % ) a0interest in the senior mezzanine loan and two other mezzanine loans at 100 a0 church street , which we acquired from gramercy capital corp . ( nyse : a0gkk ) , or gramercy , in the summer of a0 2007 . at closing of the foreclo- sure , we funded an additional $ 15.0 a0million of capital into the project as part of our agreement with wachovia bank , n.a . to extend and restructure the existing financing . gramercy declined to fund its share of this capital and instead trans- ferred its interests in the investment to us at closing . the restructured $ 139.7 a0million mortgage carries an interest rate of 350 a0basis points over the 30-day libor . the restructured mortgage , which was scheduled to mature in january a0 2013 , was repaid in march a02011 . in august a0 2010 , we acquired 125 a0 park avenue , a manhattan office tower , for $ 330 a0million . in connection with the acquisition , we assumed $ 146.25 a0million of in-place financ- ing . the 5.748% ( 5.748 % ) interest-only loan matures in october a02014 . in december a02010 , we completed the acquisition of various investments from gramercy . this acquisition included ( 1 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) a0interest in the leased fee at 885 a0third avenue for approximately $ 39.3 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 120.4 a0million , ( 2 ) a0the remaining 45% ( 45 % ) interest in the leased fee at 2 a0 herald square for approxi- mately $ 25.6 a0 million plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 86.1 a0 million and , ( 3 ) a0 the entire leased fee interest in 292 a0madison avenue for approximately $ 19.2 a0mil- lion plus assumed mortgage debt of approximately $ 59.1 a0million . these assets are all leased to third a0party operators. .
Question: what is the annual interest cost in millions for the 125 park avenue acquisition?
Answer: | 8.40645 |
FINQA3373 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities in january 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 525 million in the aggregate . as of december 29 , 2018 , $ 175 million remained available under this authorization . in february 2019 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 500.0 million in the aggregate . the actual timing and amount of repurchases are subject to business and market conditions , corporate and regulatory requirements , stock price , acquisition opportunities and other factors . the following table presents repurchases made under our current authorization and shares surrendered by employees to satisfy income tax withholding obligations during the three months ended december 29 , 2018 : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or program maximum dollar value of shares authorized for repurchase under publicly announced plan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions ) september 30 , 2018 2013 november 3 , 2018 543900 $ 42.64 495543 $ 254 november 4 , 2018 2013 december 1 , 2018 650048 $ 44.49 623692 $ 226 december 2 , 2018 2013 december 29 , 2018 1327657 $ 42.61 1203690 $ 175 .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased ( 1 )|averageprice paidper share ( 2 )|total number ofshares purchasedas part ofpublicly announcedplan or program|maximum dollarvalue of sharesauthorized for repurchase underpublicly announcedplan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions )|
|september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018|543900|$ 42.64|495543|$ 254|
|november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018|650048|$ 44.49|623692|$ 226|
|december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018|1327657|$ 42.61|1203690|$ 175|
|total|2521605|$ 43.10|2322925||
( 1 ) shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent employee surrender of shares of restricted stock to satisfy employee income tax withholding obligations due upon vesting , and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced repurchase programs . ( 2 ) the weighted average price paid per share of common stock does not include the cost of commissions. .
Question: what was the average number of total shares purchased for the three monthly periods ending december 29 , 2018?
Answer: | 840535.0 |
FINQA3374 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 . derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities . derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2014|2013|
|interest rate|$ 33725|$ 25782|
|credit derivatives|1838|1516|
|foreign exchange|21253|16790|
|equity|8177|12227|
|commodity|13982|9444|
|total net of cash collateral|78975|65759|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables|-19604 ( 19604 )|-14435 ( 14435 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 59371|$ 51324|
derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral . the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what percent of net derivative receivables were collateralized by other than cash in 2014?\\n
Answer: | 0.24823 |
FINQA3375 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2013 , 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 56 mmboe from december 31 , 2012 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2013 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|571|
|revisions of previous estimates|4|
|improved recovery|7|
|purchases of reserves in place|16|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|142|
|dispositions|-4 ( 4 )|
|transfer to proved developed|-109 ( 109 )|
|end of year|627|
significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 included 72 mmboe in the eagle ford and 49 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 57 mmboe in the eagle ford , 18 mmboe in the bakken and 7 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 2536 million , $ 1995 million and $ 1107 million . a total of 59 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2013 , 24 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled late 2014 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time as proved undeveloped reserves in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to be developed , is being executed by the operator and encompasses a continuous drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region led to an expected project execution of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes in 2013 have extended the project duration . there are no other significant undeveloped reserves expected to be developed more than five years after their original booking . as of december 31 , 2013 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2014 through 2018 are projected to be $ 2894 million , $ 2567 million , $ 2020 million , $ 1452 million and $ 575 million . the timing of future projects and estimated future development costs relating to the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves are forward-looking statements and are based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , presently known physical data concerning size and character of the reservoirs , economic recoverability , technology developments , future drilling success , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , production experience and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries , timing and development costs could be different than current estimates. .
Question: of total proven undeveloped reserves , how much consisted of extensions discoveries and other additions?
Answer: | 0.22648 |
FINQA3376 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: failure to comply with the financial and other covenants under our credit facilities , as well as the occurrence of certain material adverse events , would constitute defaults and would allow the lenders under our credit facilities to accelerate the maturity of all indebtedness under the related agreements . this could also have an adverse impact on the availability of financial assurances . in addition , maturity acceleration on our credit facilities constitutes an event of default under our other debt instruments , including our senior notes , and , therefore , our senior notes would also be subject to acceleration of maturity . if such acceleration were to occur , we would not have sufficient liquidity available to repay the indebtedness . we would likely have to seek an amendment under our credit facilities for relief from the financial covenants or repay the debt with proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity , or asset sales , if necessary . we may be unable to amend our credit facilities or raise sufficient capital to repay such obligations in the event the maturities are accelerated . financial assurance we are required to provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , insurance policies or trust deposits . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states will require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post- closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we are required to provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2010 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not debt of our company . since we currently have no liability for these financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets . however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and self-insurance liabilities as they are incurred . the underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than financial assurance instruments and operating leases that are not classified as debt . we do not guarantee any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 is calculated as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2009|2008|2007|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 1396.5|$ 512.2|$ 661.3|
|purchases of property and equipment|-826.3 ( 826.3 )|-386.9 ( 386.9 )|-292.5 ( 292.5 )|
|proceeds from sales of property and equipment|31.8|8.2|6.1|
|free cash flow|$ 602.0|$ 133.5|$ 374.9|
.
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2008 to 2009 in millions
Answer: | 468.5 |
FINQA3377 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2014 decreased 8% ( 8 % ) to $ 5.7 billion compared with $ 6.2 billion in 2013 and 8% ( 8 % ) compared with $ 6.2 billion in 2012 . operating profits in 2014 were 106% ( 106 % ) lower than in 2013 and 103% ( 103 % ) lower than in 2012 . excluding facility closure costs , impairment costs and other special items , operating profits in 2014 were 7% ( 7 % ) higher than in 2013 and 8% ( 8 % ) lower than in 2012 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations and a favorable mix ( $ 178 million ) , lower planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 26 million ) , the absence of a provision for bad debt related to a large envelope customer that was booked in 2013 ( $ 28 million ) , and lower foreign exchange and other costs ( $ 25 million ) were offset by lower sales volumes ( $ 82 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 49 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 47 million ) , and costs associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill ( $ 41 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include special items costs of $ 554 million associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . in the first quarter of 2014 , we completed our evaluation and concluded that there were no alternative uses for these assets . we recognized approximately $ 464 million of accelerated depreciation related to these assets in 2014 . operating profits in 2014 also include a charge of $ 32 million associated with a foreign tax amnesty program , and a gain of $ 20 million for the resolution of a legal contingency in india , while operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill and a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . printing papers .
|in millions|2014|2013|2012|
|sales|$ 5720|$ 6205|$ 6230|
|operating profit ( loss )|-16 ( 16 )|271|599|
north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.1 billion in 2014 , $ 2.6 billion in 2013 and $ 2.7 billion in 2012 . operating profits in 2014 were a loss of $ 398 million ( a gain of $ 156 million excluding costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill ) compared with gains of $ 36 million ( $ 154 million excluding costs associated with the courtland mill shutdown ) in 2013 and $ 331 million in 2012 . sales volumes in 2014 decreased compared with 2013 due to lower market demand for uncoated freesheet paper and the closure our courtland mill . average sales price realizations were higher , reflecting sales price increases in both domestic and export markets . higher input costs for wood were offset by lower costs for chemicals , however freight costs were higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 14 million lower in 2014 . operating profits in 2014 were negatively impacted by costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill but benefited from the absence of a provision for bad debt related to a large envelope customer that was recorded in 2013 . entering the first quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable compared with the fourth quarter of 2014 . average sales margins should improve reflecting a more favorable mix although average sales price realizations are expected to be flat . input costs are expected to be stable . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 16 million lower with an outage scheduled in the 2015 first quarter at our georgetown mill compared with outages at our eastover and riverdale mills in the 2014 fourth quarter . brazilian papers net sales for 2014 were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and $ 1.1 billion in 2012 . operating profits for 2014 were $ 177 million ( $ 209 million excluding costs associated with a tax amnesty program ) compared with $ 210 million in 2013 and $ 163 million in 2012 . sales volumes in 2014 were about flat compared with 2013 . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper due to the realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2013 and in 2014 . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher-margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals . operating costs were higher than in 2013 and planned maintenance downtime costs were flat . looking ahead to 2015 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to decrease due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price improvements are expected to reflect the partial realization of announced sales price increases in the brazilian domestic market for uncoated freesheet paper . input costs are expected to be flat . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 5 million lower with an outage scheduled at the luiz antonio mill in the first quarter . european papers net sales in 2014 were $ 1.5 billion compared with $ 1.5 billion in 2013 and $ 1.4 billion in 2012 . operating profits in 2014 were $ 140 million compared with $ 167 million in 2013 and $ 179 million in compared with 2013 , sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper in 2014 were slightly higher in both .
Question: what percentage where brazilian papers net sales of printing papers sales in 2013?
Answer: | 0.17728 |
FINQA3378 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc. , ( the 201ccompany , 201d 201camerican water 201d or 201caww 201d ) is a delaware holding company . american water is the most geographically diversified , as well as the largest publicly-traded , united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . as a holding company , we conduct substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries . our approximately 6400 employees provide an estimated 15 million people with drinking water , wastewater and/or other water-related services in 47 states and one canadian province . operating segments we report our results of operations in two operating segments : the regulated businesses and the market- based operations . additional information with respect to our operating segment results is included in the section entitled 201citem 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d and note 18 of the consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . we report the results of this business in our regulated businesses segment . our subsidiaries that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation , hereafter referred to as public utility commissions , or 201cpucs , 201d of the states in which we operate . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . our regulated businesses segment operating revenues were $ 2674.3 million for 2014 , $ 2539.9 for 2013 , $ 2564.4 million for 2012 , accounting for 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) , 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) and 89.9% ( 89.9 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table sets forth our regulated businesses operating revenues , number of customers and an estimate of population served as of december 31 , 2014 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total .
|new jersey|operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 652.3|% ( % ) of total 24.5% ( 24.5 % )|number ofcustomers 648066|% ( % ) of total 20.2% ( 20.2 % )|estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7|% ( % ) of total 22.7% ( 22.7 % )|
|pennsylvania|605.4|22.6% ( 22.6 % )|666415|20.7% ( 20.7 % )|2.2|18.5% ( 18.5 % )|
|missouri|270.2|10.1% ( 10.1 % )|464498|14.4% ( 14.4 % )|1.5|12.7% ( 12.7 % )|
|illinois ( a )|262.3|9.8% ( 9.8 % )|312017|9.7% ( 9.7 % )|1.3|10.9% ( 10.9 % )|
|california|209.8|7.8% ( 7.8 % )|174198|5.4% ( 5.4 % )|0.6|5.0% ( 5.0 % )|
|indiana|200.6|7.5% ( 7.5 % )|293666|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|1.2|10.1% ( 10.1 % )|
|west virginia ( b )|127.0|4.7% ( 4.7 % )|170371|5.3% ( 5.3 % )|0.6|5.0% ( 5.0 % )|
|subtotal ( top seven states )|2327.6|87.0% ( 87.0 % )|2729231|84.8% ( 84.8 % )|10.1|84.9% ( 84.9 % )|
|other ( c )|346.7|13.0% ( 13.0 % )|489961|15.2% ( 15.2 % )|1.8|15.1% ( 15.1 % )|
|total regulated businesses|$ 2674.3|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|3219192|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|11.9|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|
( a ) includes illinois-american water company , which we refer to as ilawc and american lake water company , also a regulated subsidiary in illinois. .
Question: what is the approximate customer penetration in the pennsylvania market area?
Answer: | 0.30292 |
FINQA3379 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) .
|year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010|fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998|year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009|fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014|
|total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )||total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )||
|included in other income ( expense )|-2824 ( 2824 )|included in other income ( expense )|-2538 ( 2538 )|
|purchases issuances and settlements|24539|purchases issuances and settlements|12536|
|transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3|-31713 ( 31713 )|transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3|2014|
|balance at december 31 2010|$ 2014|balance at december 31 2009|$ 9998|
|the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date|$ -2824 ( 2824 )|the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date|$ -2538 ( 2538 )|
the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what percent did purchase issuances and settlements increase from year ended 2009 to year ended 2010?
Answer: | 95.74825 |
FINQA3380 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. .
|( in millions of u.s . dollars )|2009 gross losses|2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )|2009 net losses|2009 gross losses|2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )|net losses|
|balance beginning of year|$ 37176|$ 12935|$ 24241|$ 37112|$ 13520|$ 23592|
|losses and loss expenses incurred|11141|3719|7422|10944|3341|7603|
|losses and loss expenses paid|-11093 ( 11093 )|-4145 ( 4145 )|-6948 ( 6948 )|-9899 ( 9899 )|-3572 ( 3572 )|-6327 ( 6327 )|
|other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )|559|236|323|-1367 ( 1367 )|-387 ( 387 )|-980 ( 980 )|
|losses and loss expenses acquired|2013|2013|2013|386|33|353|
|balance end of year|$ 37783|$ 12745|$ 25038|$ 37176|$ 12935|$ 24241|
( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what is the percentage change in net unpaid losses from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: | 0.03288 |
FINQA3381 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: blackrock information related to our equity investment in blackrock follows: .
||2009|2008|
|business segment earnings ( in millions ) ( a )|$ 207|$ 207|
|pnc 2019s share of blackrock earnings ( b )|23% ( 23 % )|33% ( 33 % )|
|carrying value of pnc 2019s investment in blackrock ( in billions ) ( b )|$ 5.8|$ 4.2|
carrying value of pnc 2019s investment in blackrock ( in billions ) ( b ) $ 5.8 $ 4.2 ( a ) includes pnc 2019s share of blackrock 2019s reported gaap earnings and additional income taxes on those earnings incurred by pnc . ( b ) at december 31 . blackrock/barclays global investors transaction on december 1 , 2009 , blackrock acquired bgi from barclays bank plc in exchange for approximately $ 6.65 billion in cash and 37566771 shares of blackrock common and participating preferred stock . in connection with the bgi transaction , blackrock entered into amendments to stockholder agreements with pnc and its other major shareholder . these amendments , which changed certain shareholder rights , including composition of the blackrock board of directors and share transfer restrictions , became effective upon closing of the bgi transaction . also in connection with the bgi transaction , blackrock entered into a stock purchase agreement with pnc in which we purchased 3556188 shares of blackrock 2019s series d preferred stock at a price of $ 140.60 per share , or $ 500 million , to partially finance the transaction . on january 31 , 2010 , the series d preferred stock was converted to series b preferred stock . upon closing of the bgi transaction , the carrying value of our investment in blackrock increased significantly , reflecting our portion of the increase in blackrock 2019s equity resulting from the value of blackrock shares issued in connection with their acquisition of bgi . pnc recognized this increase in value as a $ 1.076 billion pretax gain in the fourth quarter of 2009 . at december 31 , 2009 , our percentage ownership of blackrock common stock was approximately 35% ( 35 % ) . blackrock ltip programs and exchange agreements pnc 2019s noninterest income included pretax gains of $ 98 million in 2009 and $ 243 million in 2008 related to our blackrock ltip shares obligation . these gains represented the mark-to-market adjustment related to our remaining blackrock ltip common shares obligation and resulted from the decrease in the market value of blackrock common shares in those periods . as previously reported , pnc entered into an exchange agreement with blackrock on december 26 , 2008 . the transactions that resulted from this agreement restructured pnc 2019s ownership of blackrock equity without altering , to any meaningful extent , pnc 2019s economic interest in blackrock . pnc continues to be subject to the limitations on its voting rights in its existing agreements with blackrock . also on december 26 , 2008 , blackrock entered into an exchange agreement with merrill lynch in anticipation of the consummation of the merger of bank of america corporation and merrill lynch that occurred on january 1 , 2009 . the pnc and merrill lynch exchange agreements restructured pnc 2019s and merrill lynch 2019s respective ownership of blackrock common and preferred equity . the exchange contemplated by these agreements was completed on february 27 , 2009 . on that date , pnc 2019s obligation to deliver blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s new series c preferred stock . pnc acquired 2.9 million shares of series c preferred stock from blackrock in exchange for common shares on that same date . pnc accounts for these preferred shares at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock as we aligned the fair value marks on this asset and liability . the fair value of the blackrock series c preferred stock is included on our consolidated balance sheet in other assets . additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock is included in note 8 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . pnc accounts for its remaining investment in blackrock under the equity method of accounting , with its share of blackrock 2019s earnings reduced primarily due to the exchange of blackrock common stock for blackrock series c preferred stock . the series c preferred stock is not taken into consideration in determining pnc 2019s share of blackrock earnings under the equity method . pnc 2019s percentage ownership of blackrock common stock increased as a result of the substantial exchange of merrill lynch 2019s blackrock common stock for blackrock preferred stock . as a result of the blackrock preferred stock held by merrill lynch and the new blackrock preferred stock issued to merrill lynch and pnc under the exchange agreements , pnc 2019s share of blackrock common stock is higher than its overall share of blackrock 2019s equity and earnings . the transactions related to the exchange agreements do not affect our right to receive dividends declared by blackrock. .
Question: what was pnc's total carrying value from 2008-09 from its investment in blackrock , in billions?
Answer: | 10.0 |
FINQA3382 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 197 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|derivative receivables 2010|derivative receivables 2009|derivative receivables 2010|2009|
|gross derivative fair value|$ 1529412|$ 1565518|$ 1485109|$ 1519183|
|netting adjustment 2013offsettingreceivables/payables|-1376969 ( 1376969 )|-1419840 ( 1419840 )|-1376969 ( 1376969 )|-1419840 ( 1419840 )|
|netting adjustment 2013 cashcollateral received/paid|-71962 ( 71962 )|-65468 ( 65468 )|-38921 ( 38921 )|-39218 ( 39218 )|
|carrying value onconsolidated balancesheets|$ 80481|$ 80210|$ 69219|$ 60125|
in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had received liquid securi- ties and other cash collateral in the amount of $ 16.5 billion and $ 15.5 billion , respectively , and had posted $ 10.9 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as secu- rity against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had received $ 18.0 billion and $ 16.9 billion , respectively , and delivered $ 8.4 billion and $ 5.8 billion , respectively , of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 170 2013 187 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index- reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are otc derivative contracts . single-name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while index cds con- tracts are used to manage the credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index comprises a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are periodically established with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the refer- ence entities in the index experiences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against specific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client de- mands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of expo- sure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds contracts , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-related notes a credit-related note is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the credit-related note purchases from the note investor credit protec- tion on a referenced entity . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer the par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . if a credit event .
Question: for 2010 , how much in billions would the credit risk balance be reduced if the table considered all other collateral?
Answer: | 34.5 |
FINQA3383 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) .
|change in assumption ( a )|estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate|$ 10|
|.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets|$ 18|
|.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate|$ 3|
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .
Question: what is the estimated change in pretax pension expense between 2010 compared to 2009 in millions?
Answer: | -76.0 |
FINQA3384 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: freesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging .
|in millions|2012|2011|2010|
|sales|$ 3170|$ 3710|$ 3400|
|operating profit|268|163|207|
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .
Question: what percentage where north american consumer packaging net sales of total consumer packaging sales in 2012?
Answer: | 0.63091 |
FINQA3385 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 secondary market same store communities are generally communities in markets with populations of more than 1 million but less than 1% ( 1 % ) of the total public multifamily reit units or markets with populations of less than 1 million that we have owned and have been stabilized for at least a full 12 months . 2022 non-same store communities and other includes recent acquisitions , communities in development or lease-up , communities that have been identified for disposition , and communities that have undergone a significant casualty loss . also included in non-same store communities are non-multifamily activities . on the first day of each calendar year , we determine the composition of our same store operating segments for that year as well as adjust the previous year , which allows us to evaluate full period-over-period operating comparisons . an apartment community in development or lease-up is added to the same store portfolio on the first day of the calendar year after it has been owned and stabilized for at least a full 12 months . communities are considered stabilized after achieving 90% ( 90 % ) occupancy for 90 days . communities that have been identified for disposition are excluded from the same store portfolio . all properties acquired from post properties in the merger remained in the non-same store and other operating segment during 2017 , as the properties were recent acquisitions and had not been owned and stabilized for at least 12 months as of january 1 , 2017 . for additional information regarding our operating segments , see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . acquisitions one of our growth strategies is to acquire apartment communities that are located in various large or secondary markets primarily throughout the southeast and southwest regions of the united states . acquisitions , along with dispositions , help us achieve and maintain our desired product mix , geographic diversification and asset allocation . portfolio growth allows for maximizing the efficiency of the existing management and overhead structure . we have extensive experience in the acquisition of multifamily communities . we will continue to evaluate opportunities that arise , and we will utilize this strategy to increase our number of apartment communities in strong and growing markets . we acquired the following apartment communities during the year ended december 31 , 2017: .
|community|market|units|closing date|
|charlotte at midtown|nashville tn|279|march 16 2017|
|acklen west end|nashville tn|320|december 28 2017|
dispositions we sell apartment communities and other assets that no longer meet our long-term strategy or when market conditions are favorable , and we redeploy the proceeds from those sales to acquire , develop and redevelop additional apartment communities and rebalance our portfolio across or within geographic regions . dispositions also allow us to realize a portion of the value created through our investments and provide additional liquidity . we are then able to redeploy the net proceeds from our dispositions in lieu of raising additional capital . in deciding to sell an apartment community , we consider current market conditions and generally solicit competing bids from unrelated parties for these individual assets , considering the sales price and other key terms of each proposal . we also consider portfolio dispositions when such a structure is useful to maximize proceeds and efficiency of execution . during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we disposed of five multifamily properties totaling 1760 units and four land parcels totaling approximately 23 acres . development as another part of our growth strategy , we invest in a limited number of development projects . development activities may be conducted through wholly-owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with unaffiliated parties . fixed price construction contracts are signed with unrelated parties to minimize construction risk . we typically manage the leasing portion of the project as units become available for lease . we may also engage in limited expansion development opportunities on existing communities in which we typically serve as the developer . while we seek opportunistic new development investments offering attractive long-term investment returns , we intend to maintain a total development commitment that we consider modest in relation to our total balance sheet and investment portfolio . during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we incurred $ 170.1 million in development costs and completed 7 development projects. .
Question: what the number of units purchased in december 31 , 2017
Answer: | 599.0 |
FINQA3386 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt .
|in billions|2018|
|january 1|$ 33.3|
|issuances|4.5|
|calls and maturities|-6.8 ( 6.8 )|
|other|-.1 ( .1 )|
|december 31|$ 30.9|
.
Question: were total deposits at december 31 , 2018 greater than total senior and subordinated debt?
Answer: | yes |
FINQA3387 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . for the year ended december 31 , 2008 , we incurred $ 695.8 million of realized investment gains and $ 310.4 million of unrealized investment losses . although financial markets significantly improved during 2009 and 2010 , they could deteriorate in the future and again result in substantial realized and unrealized losses , which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year:|pre-tax catastrophe losses|
|( dollars in millions )||
|2010|$ 571.1|
|2009|67.4|
|2008|364.3|
|2007|160.0|
|2006|287.9|
.
Question: in 2008 what was the ratio of the realized investment gains to the unrealized investment losses .
Answer: | 2.24162 |
FINQA3388 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2013 , 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 56 mmboe from december 31 , 2012 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2013 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|571|
|revisions of previous estimates|4|
|improved recovery|7|
|purchases of reserves in place|16|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|142|
|dispositions|-4 ( 4 )|
|transfer to proved developed|-109 ( 109 )|
|end of year|627|
significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 included 72 mmboe in the eagle ford and 49 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 57 mmboe in the eagle ford , 18 mmboe in the bakken and 7 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 2536 million , $ 1995 million and $ 1107 million . a total of 59 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 627 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2013 , 24 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled late 2014 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time as proved undeveloped reserves in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to be developed , is being executed by the operator and encompasses a continuous drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region led to an expected project execution of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes in 2013 have extended the project duration . there are no other significant undeveloped reserves expected to be developed more than five years after their original booking . as of december 31 , 2013 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2014 through 2018 are projected to be $ 2894 million , $ 2567 million , $ 2020 million , $ 1452 million and $ 575 million . the timing of future projects and estimated future development costs relating to the development of proved undeveloped liquid hydrocarbon , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves are forward-looking statements and are based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , presently known physical data concerning size and character of the reservoirs , economic recoverability , technology developments , future drilling success , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , production experience and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries , timing and development costs could be different than current estimates. .
Question: were significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 in the eagle ford greater than the bakken?
Answer: | yes |
FINQA3389 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. .
|2006|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 32.68|$ 26.66|
|quarter ended june 30|35.75|27.35|
|quarter ended september 30|36.92|29.98|
|quarter ended december 31|38.74|35.21|
|2005|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 19.28|$ 17.30|
|quarter ended june 30|21.16|16.28|
|quarter ended september 30|25.20|20.70|
|quarter ended december 31|28.33|22.73|
on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: for the quarter ended december 312006 what was the percent of the change in share price
Answer: | 0.03125 |
FINQA3390 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 32452|
|2010|35138|
|2011|50421|
|2012|39067|
|2013|26301|
|years thereafter|137858|
|total|321237|
|less : amount representing interest|73512|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 247725|
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what percent of total lease payments is in 'years thereafter'?
Answer: | 0.42915 |
FINQA3391 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) future minimum rental receipts expected from customers under non-cancelable operating lease agreements in effect at december 31 , 2006 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2007|$ 1131677|
|2008|1127051|
|2009|1091778|
|2010|959828|
|2011|769028|
|thereafter|2305040|
|total|$ 7384402|
legal and governmental proceedings related to review of stock option granting practices and related accounting 2014on may 18 , 2006 , the company received a letter of informal inquiry from the sec division of enforcement requesting documents related to company stock option grants and stock option practices . the inquiry is focused on stock options granted to senior management and members of the company 2019s board of directors during the period 1997 to the present . the company continues to cooperate with the sec to provide the requested information and documents . on may 19 , 2006 , the company received a subpoena from the united states attorney 2019s office for the eastern district of new york for records and information relating to its stock option granting practices . the subpoena requests materials related to certain stock options granted between 1995 and the present . the company continues to cooperate with the u.s . attorney 2019s office to provide the requested information and documents . on may 26 , 2006 , a securities class action was filed in united states district court for the district of massachusetts against the company and certain of its current officers by john s . greenebaum for monetary relief . specifically , the complaint names the company , james d . taiclet , jr . and bradley e . singer as defendants and alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws in connection with public statements made relating to the company 2019s stock option practices and related accounting . the complaint asserts claims under sections 10 ( b ) and 20 ( a ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( exchange act ) and sec rule 10b-5 . in december 2006 , the court appointed the steamship trade association-international longshoreman 2019s association pension fund as the lead plaintiff . on may 24 , 2006 and june 14 , 2006 , two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in suffolk county superior court in massachusetts by eric johnston and robert l . garber , respectively . the lawsuits were filed against certain of the company 2019s current and former officers and directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment in connection with the company 2019s stock option granting practices . the lawsuits also name the company as a nominal defendant . the lawsuits seek to recover the damages sustained by the company and disgorgement of all profits received with respect to the alleged backdated stock options . in october 2006 , these two lawsuits were consolidated and transferred to the court 2019s business litigation session . on june 13 , 2006 , june 22 , 2006 and august 23 , 2006 , three shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in united states district court for the district of massachusetts by new south wales treasury corporation , as trustee for the alpha international managers trust , frank c . kalil and don holland , and leslie cramer , respectively . the lawsuits were filed against certain of the company 2019s current and former officers and directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties , waste of corporate assets , gross mismanagement and unjust enrichment in connection with the company 2019s stock option granting practices . the lawsuits also name the company as a nominal defendant . in december 2006 , the court consolidated these three lawsuits and appointed new south wales treasury corporation as the lead plaintiff . on february 9 , 2007 , the plaintiffs filed a consolidated .
Question: what was the percent of the total future minimum rental receipts expected from customers under non-cancelable that was due in 2008
Answer: | 0.15263 |
FINQA3392 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .
||2005|2004|
|acquired customer base and network location intangibles|$ 2606546|$ 1369607|
|deferred financing costs|65623|89736|
|acquired licenses and other intangibles|51703|43404|
|total|2723872|1502747|
|less accumulated amortization|-646560 ( 646560 )|-517444 ( 517444 )|
|other intangible assets net|$ 2077312|$ 985303|
the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .
Question: what was the percent of the gradual decline in the recorded amortization expense from 2006 to 2007
Answer: | 0.02973 |
FINQA3393 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2015|december 31 , 2014|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1509.7|$ 1667.2|
|short-term borrowings|$ 150.1|$ 107.2|
|current portion of long-term debt|1.9|2.1|
|long-term debt|1610.3|1612.9|
|total debt|$ 1762.3|$ 1722.2|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .
Question: what was the average dividend payment per share of common stock that was repurchased , per quarter?
Answer: | 3.59375 |
FINQA3394 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. .
|( in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|balance at january 1|$ 70.3|$ 68.1|$ 2014|
|contribution by dow jones|2014|2014|675.0|
|distribution to dow jones|2014|2014|-607.5 ( 607.5 )|
|allocation of stock-based compensation|2014|0.1|2014|
|total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest|10.5|2.1|0.6|
|balance at december 31|$ 80.8|$ 70.3|$ 68.1|
contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the eligibility limits for farmer and cooperative to individual participants in the family farmer and rancher protection fund
Answer: | 4.0 |
FINQA3395 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) .
||2005|2006|
|balance at the beginning of the year|$ 245|$ 231|
|accrual for warranties|198|193|
|warranty expense incurred for the year|-212 ( 212 )|-257 ( 257 )|
|balance at the end of the year|$ 231|$ 167|
.
Question: assuming a similar change in warranty expense as in 2006 , what would the 2007 expense provision ( 000 ) ?
Answer: | 302.0 |
FINQA3396 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 2246.1|
|retail electric price|180.0|
|volume/weather|39.5|
|waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision|-32.0 ( 32.0 )|
|miso deferral|-32.0 ( 32.0 )|
|other|7.2|
|2015 net revenue|$ 2408.8|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: the retail electric price adjustment accounted for what percentage of the 2015 total net revenue?
Answer: | 0.07473 |
FINQA3397 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized .
|( in millions )|2016 amortizedcost|2016 fairvalue|
|u.s . treasury securities|$ 5548.9|$ 5549.0|
|u.s . government agency securities|1228.3|1228.3|
cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .
Question: what was the average balance within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago for december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , in billions?
Answer: | 20.2 |
FINQA3398 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 . other assets other assets as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 consisted of the following ( in thousands ) : .
||2009|2008|
|acquired rights to use technology|$ 84313|$ 90643|
|investments|63526|76589|
|security and other deposits|11692|16087|
|prepaid royalties|12059|9026|
|deferred compensation plan assets|9045|7560|
|restricted cash|4650|7361|
|prepaid land lease|3209|3185|
|prepaid rent|1377|2658|
|other|1394|3420|
|other assets|$ 191265|$ 216529|
acquired rights to use technology purchased during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $ 6.0 million and $ 100.4 million , respectively . of the cost for fiscal 2008 , an estimated $ 56.4 million was related to future licensing rights and has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives up to fifteen years . of the remaining costs for fiscal 2008 , we estimated that $ 27.2 million was related to historical use of licensing rights which was expensed as cost of sales and the residual of $ 16.8 million for fiscal 2008 was expensed as general and administrative costs . in connection with these licensing arrangements , we have the ability to acquire additional rights to use technology in the future . see note 17 for further information regarding our contractual commitments . in general , acquired rights to use technology are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 15 years . included in investments are our indirect investments through our limited partnership interest in adobe ventures of approximately $ 37.1 million and $ 39.0 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which is consolidated in accordance with the provisions for consolidating variable interest entities . the partnership is controlled by granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures . we are the primary beneficiary of adobe ventures and bear virtually all of the risks and rewards related to our ownership . our investment in adobe ventures does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . adobe ventures carries its investments in equity securities at estimated fair value and investment gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of income . substantially all of the investments held by adobe ventures at november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 are not publicly traded and , therefore , there is no established market for these securities . in order to determine the fair value of these investments , we use the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors or estimates of current market value made by granite ventures . it is our policy to evaluate the fair value of these investments held by adobe ventures , as well as our direct investments , on a regular basis . this evaluation includes , but is not limited to , reviewing each company 2019s cash position , financing needs , earnings and revenue outlook , operational performance , management and ownership changes and competition . in the case of privately-held companies , this evaluation is based on information that we request from these companies . this information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as u.s . publicly traded companies and as such , the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies . see note 4 for further information regarding adobe ventures . also included in investments are our direct investments in privately-held companies of approximately $ 26.4 million and $ 37.6 million as of november 27 , 2009 and november 28 , 2008 , respectively , which are accounted for based on the cost method . we assess these investments for impairment in value as circumstances dictate . see note 4 for further information regarding our cost method investments . we entered into a purchase and sale agreement , effective may 12 , 2008 , for the acquisition of real property located in waltham , massachusetts . we purchased the property upon completion of construction of an office building shell and core , parking structure , and site improvements . the purchase price for the property was $ 44.7 million and closed on june 16 , 2009 . we made an initial deposit of $ 7.0 million which was included in security and other deposits as of november 28 , 2008 and the remaining balance was paid at closing . this deposit was held in escrow until closing and then applied to the purchase price. .
Question: what portion of the prepaid rent is used during 2009?
Answer: | -1281.0 |
FINQA3399 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2018 including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefits payments. .
|2009|$ 19766|
|2010|18182|
|2011|25518|
|2012|21029|
|2013|24578|
|2014 2013 2018|118709|
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to 2007 company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company had a value appreciation program ( 201cvap 201d ) , which was an incentive compensation plan established in 1995 . annual awards were granted to vap participants from 1995 through 1998 , which entitled participants to the net appreciation on a portfolio of securities of members of mastercard international . in 1999 , the vap was replaced by an executive incentive plan ( 201ceip 201d ) and the senior executive incentive plan ( 201cseip 201d ) ( together the 201ceip plans 201d ) ( see note 16 ( share based payments and other benefits ) ) . contributions to the vap have been discontinued , all plan assets have been disbursed and no vap liability remained as of december 31 , 2008 . the company 2019s liability related to the vap at december 31 , 2007 was $ 986 . the expense ( benefit ) was $ ( 6 ) , $ ( 267 ) and $ 3406 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 12 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees and retirees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007. .
Question: considering the years 2007-2008 , what was the increase observed in the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans?
Answer: | 0.30912 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.