id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA2800 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. .
|december 31 2009 ( in millions )|derivative receivables|derivative payables|
|gross derivative fair value|$ 1565518|$ 1519183|
|nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables|-1419840 ( 1419840 )|-1419840 ( 1419840 )|
|nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid|-65468 ( 65468 )|-39218 ( 39218 )|
|carrying value on consolidated balance sheets|$ 80210|$ 60125|
in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: at december 31 , 2009 , what was the ratio of the firm had received to the additional collateral .
Answer: | 2.91379 |
FINQA2801 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) net proved undeveloped reserves . the following table presents the changes in eog's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in mboe ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at january 1|1162635|1053027|1045640|
|extensions and discoveries|490725|237378|138101|
|revisions|-8244 ( 8244 )|33127|64413|
|acquisition of reserves|311|2014|2014|
|sale of reserves|2014|-8253 ( 8253 )|-45917 ( 45917 )|
|conversion to proved developed reserves|-265718 ( 265718 )|-152644 ( 152644 )|-149210 ( 149210 )|
|balance at december 31|1379709|1162635|1053027|
for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2018 , total puds increased by 217 mmboe to 1380 mmboe . eog added approximately 31 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds ( see discussion of technology employed on pages f-36 and f-37 of this annual report on form 10-k ) , eog added 460 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin , anadarko basin , the eagle ford and , to a lesser extent , the rocky mountain area , and 80% ( 80 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2018 , eog drilled and transferred 266 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 2745 million . all puds , including drilled but uncompleted wells ( ducs ) , are scheduled for completion within five years of the original reserve booking . for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2017 , total puds increased by 110 mmboe to 1163 mmboe . eog added approximately 38 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds , eog added 199 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin and , to a lesser extent , the eagle ford and the rocky mountain area , and 74% ( 74 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2017 , eog drilled and transferred 153 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 1440 million . revisions of puds totaled positive 33 mmboe , primarily due to updated type curves resulting from improved performance of offsetting wells in the permian basin , the impact of increases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the december 31 , 2017 , reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate , and lower costs . during 2017 , eog sold or exchanged 8 mmboe of puds primarily in the permian basin . for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2016 , total puds increased by 7 mmboe to 1053 mmboe . eog added approximately 21 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds , eog added 117 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin and , to a lesser extent , the rocky mountain area , and 82% ( 82 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2016 , eog drilled and transferred 149 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 1230 million . revisions of puds totaled positive 64 mmboe , primarily due to improved well performance , primarily in the delaware basin , and lower production costs , partially offset by the impact of decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the december 31 , 2016 , reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate . during 2016 , eog sold 46 mmboe of puds primarily in the haynesville play. .
Question: considering the changes in eog's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , what is the average value of extensions and discoveries?
Answer: | 288734.66667 |
FINQA2802 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 96.5 million , $ 29.6 million and $ 4.7 million , respectively . the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 217.4 million , $ 240.4 million and $ 15.1 million , respectively . proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the company 2019s statement of cash flows of $ 217.2 million , $ 216.1 million and $ 12.4 million for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are net of the value of shares surrendered by employees in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options , and to satisfy employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and in connection with the exercise of stock options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . the withholding amount is based on the company 2019s minimum statutory withholding requirement . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2011 and changes during the year then ended is presented below : restricted outstanding weighted- average grant- date fair value per share .
||restricted stock units outstanding|weighted- average grant- date fair value per share|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 30 2010|1265|$ 28.21|
|units granted|898|$ 34.93|
|restrictions lapsed|-33 ( 33 )|$ 24.28|
|units forfeited|-42 ( 42 )|$ 31.39|
|restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2011|2088|$ 31.10|
as of october 29 , 2011 , there was $ 88.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was approximately $ 49.6 million , $ 67.7 million and $ 74.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 5 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2011 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 125.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 4278.5 million under this program . an additional $ 721.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the amount of cash available to the company in the united states and the company 2019s financial performance , outlook and liquidity . the company also from time to time repurchases shares in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units , or in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options granted to the company 2019s employees under the company 2019s equity compensation plans . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the total fair value of restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 , 2011?
Answer: | 64936.8 |
FINQA2803 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year:|pre-tax catastrophe losses|
|( dollars in millions )||
|2016|$ 301.2|
|2015|53.8|
|2014|56.3|
|2013|194.0|
|2012|410.0|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in the amount of pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016 in millions
Answer: | 247.4 |
FINQA2804 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : .
||2018|2017|
|carrying amount at beginning of period|$ 946848|$ 912926|
|liabilities incurred|79057|54764|
|liabilities settled ( 1 )|-70829 ( 70829 )|-61871 ( 61871 )|
|accretion|36622|34708|
|revisions|-38932 ( 38932 )|-9818 ( 9818 )|
|foreign currency translations|1611|16139|
|carrying amount at end of period|$ 954377|$ 946848|
|current portion|$ 26214|$ 19259|
|noncurrent portion|$ 928163|$ 927589|
( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the liabilities incurred during 2017 and 2018?
Answer: | 0.44359 |
FINQA2805 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|12/31/2016|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 103.84|$ 152.16|$ 165.35|$ 154.61|$ 189.72|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 115.99|$ 153.54|$ 174.54|$ 176.94|$ 198.09|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 107.49|$ 151.97|$ 190.07|$ 158.22|$ 192.80|
.
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Answer: | 0.8972 |
FINQA2806 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) we determine the discount rate used in the measurement of our obligations based on a model that matches the timing and amount of expected benefit payments to maturities of high quality bonds priced as of the plan measurement date . when that timing does not correspond to a published high-quality bond rate , our model uses an expected yield curve to determine an appropriate current discount rate . the yields on the bonds are used to derive a discount rate for the liability . the term of our obligation , based on the expected retirement dates of our workforce , is approximately eight years . in developing our expected rate of return assumption , we have evaluated the actual historical performance and long-term return projections of the plan assets , which give consideration to the asset mix and the anticipated timing of the plan outflows . we employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for what we consider a prudent level of risk . the intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run . risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities , plan funded status and our financial condition . the investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments . furthermore , equity investments are diversified across u.s . and non-u.s . stocks as well as growth , value , and small and large capitalizations . derivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner ; however , derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of the underlying investments . investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements , periodic asset and liability studies , and quarterly investment portfolio reviews . the following table summarizes our target asset allocation for 2015 and actual asset allocation as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 for our plan : target allocation actual allocation actual allocation .
||targetassetallocation|2015actualassetallocation|2014actualassetallocation|
|debt securities|72% ( 72 % )|72% ( 72 % )|70% ( 70 % )|
|equity securities|28|28|30|
|total|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
for 2016 , the investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a broadly diversified portfolio designed to achieve our target of an average long-term rate of return of 5.64% ( 5.64 % ) . while we believe we can achieve a long- term average return of 5.64% ( 5.64 % ) , we cannot be certain that the portfolio will perform to our expectations . assets are strategically allocated among debt and equity portfolios to achieve a diversification level that reduces fluctuations in investment returns . asset allocation target ranges and strategies are reviewed periodically with the assistance of an independent external consulting firm. .
Question: based on the 2014 actual asset allocation what was the debt to equity ratio
Answer: | 2.33333 |
FINQA2807 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and brent average prices widened significantly in 2011 and remained in 2012 in comparison to almost no differential in 2010 . natural gas 2013 a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average henry hub settlement prices for natural gas were lower in 2012 than in recent years . a decline in average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices began in september 2011 and continued into 2012 . although prices stabilized in late 2012 , they have not increased appreciably . our other major natural gas-producing regions are e.g . and europe . in the case of e.g . our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realizations less volatile . because natural gas sales from e.g . are at fixed prices , our worldwide reported average natural gas realizations may not fully track market price movements . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . oil sands mining the osm segment produces and sells various qualities of synthetic crude oil . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or upgrader . sales prices for roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily wcs . in 2012 , the wcs discount from wti had increased , putting downward pressure on our average realizations . the operating cost structure of the osm operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( "aeco" ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. .
|benchmark|2012|2011|2010|
|wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )|$ 94.15|$ 95.11|$ 79.61|
|wcs ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )|$ 73.18|$ 77.97|$ 65.31|
|aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )|$ 2.39|$ 3.68|$ 3.89|
wcs ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) $ 73.18 $ 77.97 $ 65.31 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 2.39 $ 3.68 $ 3.89 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our ig operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g . world lng trade in 2012 has been estimated to be 240 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in e.g. , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 3.8 mmt , 4.1 mmt and 3.7 mmt in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in e.g . through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1.1 mmt , 1.0 mmt and 0.9 mmt in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2012 has been estimated to be 49 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of world demand. .
Question: what was the difference in the average price of wti crude and wcs in 2012?
Answer: | 20.97 |
FINQA2808 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: .
|( in millions )|2013|2012|2011|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 20776|$ 18884|$ 20963|
|net cash used for investing activities|-18073 ( 18073 )|-14060 ( 14060 )|-10301 ( 10301 )|
|net cash used for financing activities|-5498 ( 5498 )|-1408 ( 1408 )|-11100 ( 11100 )|
|effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents|-9 ( 9 )|-3 ( 3 )|5|
|net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents|$ -2804 ( 2804 )|$ 3413|$ -433 ( 433 )|
operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: in 2013 what was the percent of the net cash used for investing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities
Answer: | 0.8699 |
FINQA2809 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 2224|
|nuclear realized price changes|-310 ( 310 )|
|vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014|-305 ( 305 )|
|nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect|20|
|other|37|
|2015 net revenue|$ 1666|
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: was the tax benefit from the the stipulated settlement in the business combination granting customer credits greater than the change in revenue between years?
Answer: | no |
FINQA2810 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: tax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: .
||2010|2009|
|dividend yield|2.9% ( 2.9 % )|3.6% ( 3.6 % )|
|volatility rate|25% ( 25 % )|25% ( 25 % )|
|risk-free interest rate|2.3% ( 2.3 % )|1.7% ( 1.7 % )|
|expected option life ( years )|6|5 & 6|
the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .
Question: what is the total tax benefits realized during 2011?
Answer: | 12.0 |
FINQA2811 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: repatriated , the related u.s . tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings . as of november 30 , 2012 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s . income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 2.9 billion . the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 0.8 billion . as of november 30 , 2012 , we have u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 33.7 million for federal and $ 77.7 million for state . we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 1.9 million , $ 18.0 million and $ 17.6 million , respectively . the net operating loss carryforward assets , federal tax credits and foreign tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2017 through 2032 . the state tax credit carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely . the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , but are expected to be fully realized . in addition , we have been tracking certain deferred tax attributes of $ 45.0 million which have not been recorded in the financial statements pursuant to accounting standards related to stock-based compensation . these amounts are no longer included in our gross or net deferred tax assets . pursuant to these standards , the benefit of these deferred tax assets will be recorded to equity if and when they reduce taxes payable . as of november 30 , 2012 , a valuation allowance of $ 28.2 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments and certain foreign assets . for fiscal 2012 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 23.0 million , of which $ 2.1 million was recorded as a tax benefit through the income statement . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2012 and 2011 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2011|
|beginning balance|$ 163607|$ 156925|
|gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions|1038|11901|
|gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions|2014|-4154 ( 4154 )|
|gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions|23771|32420|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-1754 ( 1754 )|-29101 ( 29101 )|
|lapse of statute of limitations|-25387 ( 25387 )|-3825 ( 3825 )|
|foreign exchange gains and losses|-807 ( 807 )|-559 ( 559 )|
|ending balance|$ 160468|$ 163607|
as of november 30 , 2012 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.5 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2013 , it is reasonably possible table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: | -0.01919 |
FINQA2812 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2014|2015|2016|2017|2018 - 2022|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 1900|$ 1970|$ 2050|$ 2130|$ 2220|$ 12880|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|200|210|220|220|220|1080|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what is the percentage change in common stock held by defined contribution plans from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: | -0.06718 |
FINQA2813 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other expense , net increased $ 0.8 million to $ 7.2 million in 2015 from $ 6.4 million in 2014 . this increase was due to higher net losses on the combined foreign currency exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and our foreign currency derivative financial instruments in 2015 . provision for income taxes increased $ 19.9 million to $ 154.1 million in 2015 from $ 134.2 million in 2014 . our effective tax rate was 39.9% ( 39.9 % ) in 2015 compared to 39.2% ( 39.2 % ) in 2014 . our effective tax rate for 2015 was higher than the effective tax rate for 2014 primarily due to increased non-deductible costs incurred in connection with our connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 . year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to year ended december 31 , 2013 net revenues increased $ 752.3 million , or 32.3% ( 32.3 % ) , to $ 3084.4 million in 2014 from $ 2332.1 million in 2013 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: .
|( in thousands )|year ended december 31 , 2014|year ended december 31 , 2013|year ended december 31 , $ change|year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change|
|apparel|$ 2291520|$ 1762150|$ 529370|30.0% ( 30.0 % )|
|footwear|430987|298825|132162|44.2|
|accessories|275409|216098|59311|27.4|
|total net sales|2997916|2277073|720843|31.7|
|license revenues|67229|53910|13319|24.7|
|connected fitness|19225|1068|18157|1700.1|
|total net revenues|$ 3084370|$ 2332051|$ 752319|32.3% ( 32.3 % )|
the increase in net sales were driven primarily by : 2022 apparel unit sales growth and new offerings in multiple lines led by training , hunt and golf ; and 2022 footwear unit sales growth , led by running and basketball . license revenues increased $ 13.3 million , or 24.7% ( 24.7 % ) , to $ 67.2 million in 2014 from $ 53.9 million in 2013 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased distribution and continued unit volume growth by our licensees . connected fitness revenue increased $ 18.1 million to $ 19.2 million in 2014 from $ 1.1 million in 2013 primarily due to a full year of revenue from our connected fitness business in 2014 compared to one month in gross profit increased $ 375.5 million to $ 1512.2 million in 2014 from $ 1136.7 million in 2013 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 30 basis points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) in 2014 compared to 48.7% ( 48.7 % ) in 2013 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase driven primarily by decreased sales mix of excess inventory through our factory house outlet stores ; and 2022 approximate 20 basis point increase as a result of higher duty costs recorded during the prior year on certain products imported in previous years . the above increases were partially offset by : 2022 approximate 10 basis point decrease by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. .
Question: in 2014 what was the percent of the sales revenues of apparel to the total revenues
Answer: | 0.74295 |
FINQA2814 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2018|2017|
|total net of cash collateral|$ 54213|$ 56523|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )|-15322 ( 15322 )|-16108 ( 16108 )|
|total net of all collateral|$ 38891|$ 40415|
( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .
Question: in 2018 review of the net derivative receivable what was the ratio of the total net of cash collateral to the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables
Answer: | 3.53825 |
FINQA2815 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2006 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.1 billion and $ 2.5 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|years ended december 31,|federal|state|
|2007 to 2011||$ 438967|
|2012 to 2016||478502|
|2017 to 2021|$ 617039|1001789|
|2022 to 2026|1476644|629354|
|total|$ 2093683|$ 2548612|
sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2006 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 308.2 million , including approximately $ 153.6 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards assumed as of the acquisition date . the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . approximately $ 148.3 million of the spectrasite valuation allowances as of december 31 , 2006 will be recorded as a reduction to goodwill if the underlying deferred tax assets are utilized . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses . in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million . based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million , plus interest . the company expects settlement of this matter in the first half of 2007 , however , there can be no assurances with respect to the timing of any refund . because of the uncertainty associated with the claim , the company has not recognized any amounts related to interest . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2006 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.4 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2007 to december 31 , 2026 . if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it .
Question: what portion of state operating loss carryforwards expire between 2017 and 2021?
Answer: | 0.39307 |
FINQA2816 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 14 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 included $ 2024 million , net of $ 869 million of amortization , and $ 2062 million , net of $ 887 million of amortization , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the amortization for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases .
|millions of dollars|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2009|$ 657|$ 188|
|2010|614|168|
|2011|580|178|
|2012|465|122|
|2013|389|152|
|later years|3204|1090|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 5909|$ 1898|
|amount representing interest|n/a|628|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 1270|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 747 million in 2008 , $ 810 million in 2007 , and $ 798 million in 2006 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 15 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us in measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 88% ( 88 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 12% ( 12 % ) related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2008 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from .
Question: what was the ratio of the rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month in 2008 to 2007
Answer: | 0.92222 |
FINQA2817 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 22 general mills 2014 annual report 23 gross margin declined 1 percent in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . gross margin as a percent of net sales of 36 percent was relatively flat compared to fiscal 2013 . selling , general and administrative ( sg&a ) expenses decreased $ 78 million in fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 . the decrease in sg&a expenses was primarily driven by a 3 percent decrease in advertising and media expense , a smaller contribution to the general mills foundation , a decrease in incentive compensation expense and lower pension expense compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , we recorded a $ 39 million charge related to venezuela currency devaluation compared to a $ 9 million charge in fiscal 2013 . in addition , we recorded $ 12 million of inte- gration costs in fiscal 2013 related to our acquisition of yoki . sg&a expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 1 percent compared to fiscal 2013 . restructuring , impairment , and other exit costs totaled $ 4 million in fiscal 2014 . the restructuring charge related to a productivity and cost savings plan approved in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 . these restructuring actions were completed in fiscal 2014 . in fiscal 2014 , we paid $ 22 million in cash related to restructuring actions . during fiscal 2014 , we recorded a divestiture gain of $ 66 million related to the sale of certain grain elevators in our u.s . retail segment . there were no divestitures in fiscal 2013 . interest , net for fiscal 2014 totaled $ 302 million , $ 15 million lower than fiscal 2013 . the average interest rate decreased 41 basis points , including the effect of the mix of debt , generating a $ 31 million decrease in net interest . average interest bearing instruments increased $ 367 million , generating a $ 16 million increase in net interest . our consolidated effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was 33.3 percent compared to 29.2 percent in fiscal 2013 . the 4.1 percentage point increase was primarily related to the restructuring of our general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) subsidiary during the first quarter of 2013 which resulted in a $ 63 million decrease to deferred income tax liabilities related to the tax basis of the investment in gmc and certain distributed assets , with a correspond- ing non-cash reduction to income taxes . during fiscal 2013 , we also recorded a $ 34 million discrete decrease in income tax expense and an increase in our deferred tax assets related to certain actions taken to restore part of the tax benefits associated with medicare part d subsidies which had previously been reduced in fiscal 2010 with the enactment of the patient protection and affordable care act , as amended by the health care and education reconciliation act of 2010 . our fiscal 2013 tax expense also includes a $ 12 million charge associated with the liquidation of a corporate investment . after-tax earnings from joint ventures for fiscal 2014 decreased to $ 90 million compared to $ 99 million in fiscal 2013 primarily driven by increased consumer spending at cereal partners worldwide ( cpw ) and unfavorable foreign currency exchange from h e4agen- dazs japan , inc . ( hdj ) . the change in net sales for each joint venture is set forth in the following table : joint venture change in net sales as reported constant currency basis fiscal 2014 fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 vs . 2013 cpw ( 1 ) % ( % ) flat .
|cpw|as reported fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 ( 1 ) % ( % )|constant currency basis fiscal 2014 vs . 2013 flat||
|hdj|-8 ( 8 )|9|% ( % )|
|joint ventures|( 2 ) % ( % )|2|% ( % )|
in fiscal 2014 , cpw net sales declined by 1 percent- age point due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange . contribution from volume growth was flat compared to fiscal 2013 . in fiscal 2014 , net sales for hdj decreased 8 percentage points from fiscal 2013 as 11 percentage points of contributions from volume growth was offset by 17 percentage points of net sales decline from unfa- vorable foreign currency exchange and 2 percentage points of net sales decline attributable to unfavorable net price realization and mix . average diluted shares outstanding decreased by 20 million in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013 due primar- ily to the repurchase of 36 million shares , partially offset by the issuance of 7 million shares related to stock compensation plans . fiscal 2014 consolidated balance sheet analysis cash and cash equivalents increased $ 126 million from fiscal 2013 . receivables increased $ 37 million from fiscal 2013 pri- marily driven by timing of sales . inventories increased $ 14 million from fiscal 2013 . prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased $ 29 million from fiscal 2013 , mainly due to a decrease in other receivables related to the liquidation of a corporate investment . land , buildings , and equipment increased $ 64 million from fiscal 2013 , as $ 664 million of capital expenditures .
Question: what is the growth rate of earnings generated from joint ventures from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: | -0.09091 |
FINQA2818 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 .
|( in millions )|2007|2006|2005|
|net sales|$ 11143|$ 10519|$ 9811|
|operating profit|1410|1264|1078|
|backlog at year-end|21200|19700|18600|
net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what was the percentage change in backlog from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: | 0.07614 |
FINQA2819 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 91% ( 91 % ) and 86% ( 86 % ) as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2014|$ -35.5 ( 35.5 )|$ 36.6|
|2013|-26.9 ( 26.9 )|27.9|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 . we had $ 1667.2 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2014 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2014 and 2013 , we had interest income of $ 27.4 and $ 24.7 , respectively . based on our 2014 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.7 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2014 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2014 included the argentine peso , australian dollar , brazilian real and british pound sterling . based on 2014 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2014 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested to generate the stated interest income in 2014 , what would be the average interest rate?
Answer: | 0.01643 |
FINQA2820 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 78 of 98 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 17 . financial instruments and risk management ( continued ) at december 31 , 2006 , the company had outstanding interest rate swap agreements in europe with notional amounts of 20ac135 million paying fixed rates . approximately $ 4 million of net gain associated with these contracts is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at december 31 , 2006 , of which $ 0.8 million is expected to be recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings during 2007 . approximately $ 1.1 million of net gain related to the termination or deselection of hedges is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at december 31 , 2006 . the amount recognized in 2006 earnings related to terminated hedges was insignificant . the fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts with the exception of long-term debt . rates currently available to the company for loans with similar terms and maturities are used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt based on discounted cash flows . the fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that we would pay or receive upon termination of the contracts at december 31 , 2006 , taking into account any unrealized gains and losses on open contracts. .
|( $ in millions )|2006 carryingamount|2006 fairvalue|2006 carryingamount|fair value|
|long-term debt including current portion|$ 2311.6|$ 2314.1|$ 1482.9|$ 1496.6|
|unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivative contracts|2013|3.7|2013|-0.1 ( 0.1 )|
foreign currency exchange rate risk our objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to protect foreign cash flows and earnings from changes associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes through the use of cash flow hedges . in addition , we manage foreign earnings translation volatility through the use of foreign currency options . our foreign currency translation risk results from the european euro , british pound , canadian dollar , polish zloty , serbian dinar , brazilian real , argentine peso and chinese renminbi . we face currency exposures in our global operations as a result of purchasing raw materials in u.s . dollars and , to a lesser extent , in other currencies . sales contracts are negotiated with customers to reflect cost changes and , where there is not a foreign exchange pass-through arrangement , the company uses forward and option contracts to manage foreign currency exposures . such contracts outstanding at december 31 , 2006 , expire within four years and there are no amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these contracts. .
Question: approximately what percent of the net gain on hedging in aoci at 12/31/06 is expected to impact net income during 2007?
Answer: | 0.2 |
FINQA2821 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: discount rate 2014the assumed discount rate is used to determine the current retirement related benefit plan expense and obligations , and represents the interest rate that is used to determine the present value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to effectively settle a plan 2019s benefit obligations . the discount rate assumption is determined for each plan by constructing a portfolio of high quality bonds with cash flows that match the estimated outflows for future benefit payments to determine a single equivalent discount rate . benefit payments are not only contingent on the terms of a plan , but also on the underlying participant demographics , including current age , and assumed mortality . we use only bonds that are denominated in u.s . dollars , rated aa or better by two of three nationally recognized statistical rating agencies , have a minimum outstanding issue of $ 50 million as of the measurement date , and are not callable , convertible , or index linked . since bond yields are generally unavailable beyond 30 years , we assume those rates will remain constant beyond that point . taking into consideration the factors noted above , our weighted average discount rate for pensions was 5.23% ( 5.23 % ) and 5.84% ( 5.84 % ) , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . our weighted average discount rate for other postretirement benefits was 4.94% ( 4.94 % ) and 5.58% ( 5.58 % ) as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . expected long-term rate of return 2014the expected long-term rate of return on assets is used to calculate net periodic expense , and is based on such factors as historical returns , targeted asset allocations , investment policy , duration , expected future long-term performance of individual asset classes , inflation trends , portfolio volatility , and risk management strategies . while studies are helpful in understanding current trends and performance , the assumption is based more on longer term and prospective views . in order to reflect expected lower future market returns , we have reduced the expected long-term rate of return assumption from 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) , used to record 2011 expense , to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for 2012 . the decrease in the expected return on assets assumption is primarily related to lower bond yields and updated return assumptions for equities . unless plan assets and benefit obligations are subject to remeasurement during the year , the expected return on pension assets is based on the fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year . an increase or decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return assumptions would have had the following approximate impacts on pensions : ( $ in millions ) increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense increase ( decrease ) in december 31 , 2011 obligations .
|( $ in millions )|increase ( decrease ) in 2012 expense|increase ( decrease ) in december 31 2011 obligations|
|25 basis point decrease in discount rate|$ 18|$ 146|
|25 basis point increase in discount rate|-17 ( 17 )|-154 ( 154 )|
|25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets|8|n.a .|
|25 basis point increase in expected return on assets|-8 ( 8 )|n.a .|
differences arising from actual experience or changes in assumptions might materially affect retirement related benefit plan obligations and the funded status . actuarial gains and losses arising from differences from actual experience or changes in assumptions are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income . this unrecognized amount is amortized to the extent it exceeds 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of the plan 2019s benefit obligation or plan assets . the amortization period for actuarial gains and losses is the estimated average remaining service life of the plan participants , which is approximately 10 years . cas expense 2014in addition to providing the methodology for calculating retirement related benefit plan costs , cas also prescribes the method for assigning those costs to specific periods . while the ultimate liability for such costs under fas and cas is similar , the pattern of cost recognition is different . the key drivers of cas pension expense include the funded status and the method used to calculate cas reimbursement for each of our plans as well as our expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption . unlike fas , cas requires the discount rate to be consistent with the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption , which changes infrequently given its long-term nature . as a result , changes in bond or other interest rates generally do not impact cas . in addition , unlike under fas , we can only allocate pension costs for a plan under cas until such plan is fully funded as determined under erisa requirements . other fas and cas considerations 2014we update our estimates of future fas and cas costs at least annually based on factors such as calendar year actual plan asset returns , final census data from the end of the prior year , and other actual and projected experience . a key driver of the difference between fas and cas expense ( and consequently , the fas/cas adjustment ) is the pattern of earnings and expense recognition for gains and losses that arise when our asset and liability experiences differ from our assumptions under each set of requirements . under fas , our net gains and losses exceeding the 10% ( 10 % ) corridor are amortized .
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average discount rate for other post-retirement benefits from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | -0.1147 |
FINQA2822 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .
|december 31,|citigroup|s&p 500 index|s&p financial index|
|2006|119.55|115.79|119.19|
|2007|66.10|122.15|96.98|
|2008|15.88|76.96|43.34|
|2009|7.85|97.33|50.80|
|2010|11.22|111.99|56.96|
.
Question: in 2007 what was the ratio of the cumulative total return for citigroup to s&p 500 index
Answer: | 0.54114 |
FINQA2823 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , entergy new orleans has $ 53.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . the planned capital investment estimate for entergy new orleans reflects capital required to support existing business . the estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , changes in project plans , and the ability to access capital . management provides more information on long-term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 and to the financial statements . as an indirect , wholly-owned subsidiary of entergy corporation , entergy new orleans pays dividends from its earnings at a percentage determined monthly . entergy new orleans 2019s long-term debt indentures contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy new orleans 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; and debt and preferred stock issuances . entergy new orleans may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2011|2010|2009|2008|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|$ 9074|$ 21820|$ 66149|$ 60093|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 100 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through july 2012 . entergy louisiana 2019s ninemile point unit 6 self-build project in june 2011 , entergy louisiana filed with the lpsc an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by entergy louisiana 2019s construction of a combined-cycle gas turbine generating facility ( ninemile 6 ) at its existing ninemile point electric generating station . ninemile 6 will be a nominally-sized 550 mw unit that is estimated to cost approximately $ 721 million to construct , excluding interconnection and transmission upgrades . entergy gulf states louisiana joined in the application , seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the capacity and energy generated by ninemile 6 . the ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% ( 55 % ) to entergy louisiana , 25% ( 25 % ) to entergy gulf states louisiana , and 20% ( 20 % ) to entergy new orleans . in february 2012 the city council passed a resolution authorizing entergy new orleans to purchase 20% ( 20 % ) of the ninemile 6 energy and capacity . if approvals are obtained from the lpsc and other permitting agencies , ninemile 6 construction is .
Question: what was the average entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2008 to 2011
Answer: | 78570.0 |
FINQA2824 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2012 net revenue|$ 4969|
|retail electric price|236|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|165|
|grand gulf recovery|75|
|volume/weather|40|
|fuel recovery|35|
|miso deferral|12|
|decommissioning trusts|-23 ( 23 )|
|other|15|
|2013 net revenue|$ 5524|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , effective january 2013 , which includes an increase relating to the waterford 3 steam generator replacement project , which was placed in service in december 2012 . the net income effect of the formula rate plan increase is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 the recovery of hinds plant costs through the power management rider at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of 2013 . the net income effect of the hinds plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hinds plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 an increase in the capacity acquisition rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective with the first billing cycle of december 2012 , relating to the hot spring plant acquisition . the net income effect of the hot spring plant cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity on the net plant investment with the remainder offset by the hot spring plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2012 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective july 2012 , as a result of the puct 2019s order that was issued in september 2012 in the november 2011 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , effective september 2013 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana agreed to share with customers the savings from an irs settlement related to the uncertain tax position regarding the hurricane katrina and hurricane rita louisiana act 55 financing . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the tax settlement . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what percentage of the change in net revenue between 2012 and 2013 is due to retail electric price changes?
Answer: | 0.42523 |
FINQA2825 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .
|2014|$ 610|
|2015|613|
|2016|587|
|2017|551|
|2018|505|
|thereafter|1855|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4721|
.
Question: why is the information relative to 2012 costs incorrect and what would the correct information be?
Answer: | 856.0 |
FINQA2826 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 5829|
|retail electric price|289|
|louisiana business combination customer credits|107|
|volume/weather|14|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17 ( 17 )|
|other|-43 ( 43 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 6179|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain as a percentage of net revenue in 2015?
Answer: | 0.02642 |
FINQA2827 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 2008|december 31 2007|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 4273|$ 6392|
|aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance|$ 138|$ 136|
|balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|$ 9|$ 17|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue|$ 2|$ 2014|
the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the fair value of the msr from 2007 to 2008
Answer: | -0.33151 |
FINQA2828 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses decreased slightly during 2012 by $ 4.7 to $ 137.3 compared to 2011 , primarily due to lower office and general expenses , partially offset by an increase in temporary help to support our information-technology system-upgrade initiatives . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .
|cash flow data|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|years ended december 31 , 2011|
|net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1|$ 598.4|$ 697.2|$ 735.7|
|net cash used in working capital b2|-9.6 ( 9.6 )|-293.2 ( 293.2 )|-359.4 ( 359.4 )|
|changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash|4.1|-46.8 ( 46.8 )|-102.8 ( 102.8 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 592.9|$ 357.2|$ 273.5|
|net cash used in investing activities|-224.5 ( 224.5 )|-210.2 ( 210.2 )|-58.8 ( 58.8 )|
|net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities|-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )|131.3|-541.0 ( 541.0 )|
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . net cash provided by operating activities during 2012 was $ 357.2 , which was an increase of $ 83.7 as compared to 2011 , primarily as a result of a decrease in working capital usage of $ 66.2 . the net working capital usage in 2012 was primarily impacted by our media businesses . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues , and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily relates to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 relate primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013. .
Question: what portion of the change in net cash used for investing activities was used for capital expenditures in 2013?
Answer: | 0.7706 |
FINQA2829 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest and penalties with respect to unrecognized tax benefits were $ 3 million as of each of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 . during 2013 , the company recorded a reduction of $ 14 million to its liability for uncertain tax positions related to a change approved by the irs for the allocation of interest costs to long term construction contracts at ingalls . this change was made on a prospective basis only and did not impact the tax returns filed for years prior to 2013 . the following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under examination or remain open under the applicable statute of limitations and subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the company operates: .
|jurisdiction united states|jurisdiction 2007|jurisdiction -|2014|
|california|2010|-|2014|
|louisiana|2012|-|2014|
|mississippi|2012|-|2014|
|virginia|2012|-|2014|
although the company believes it has adequately provided for all uncertain tax positions , amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than the company's accrued position . accordingly , additional provisions for federal and state income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are effectively settled or otherwise resolved . conversely , the company could settle positions with the tax authorities for amounts lower than have been accrued . the company believes that it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the company's liability for uncertain tax positions may decrease by approximately $ 2 million due to statute of limitation expirations . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the irs is currently conducting an examination of northrop grumman's consolidated tax returns , of which hii was part , for the years 2007 through the spin-off . during 2013 the company entered into the pre-compliance assurance process with the irs for years 2011 and 2012 . the company is part of the irs compliance assurance process program for the 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 tax years . open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination . as of march 31 , 2011 , the date of the spin-off , the company's liability for uncertain tax positions was approximately $ 4 million , net of federal benefit , which related solely to state income tax positions . under the terms of the separation agreement , northrop grumman is obligated to reimburse hii for any settlement liabilities paid by hii to any government authority for tax periods prior to the spin-off , which include state income taxes . as a result , the company recorded in other assets a reimbursement receivable of approximately $ 4 million , net of federal benefit , related to uncertain tax positions for state income taxes as of the date of the spin-off . in 2014 , the statute of limitations expired for the $ 4 million liability related to state uncertain tax positions as of the spin-off date . accordingly , the $ 4 million liability and the associated reimbursement receivable were written off . on september 13 , 2013 , the treasury department and the internal revenue service issued final regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of amounts paid to acquire , produce , improve , or dispose of tangible personal property . these regulations are generally effective for tax years beginning on or after january 1 , 2014 . the application of these regulations did not have a material impact on the company's consolidated financial statements . deferred income taxes - deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes . such amounts are classified in the consolidated statements of financial position as current or non-current assets or liabilities based upon the classification of the related assets and liabilities. .
Question: what is the current tax examination period in california , in years?
Answer: | 4.0 |
FINQA2830 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no . 123 to stock-based compensation . the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : .
||2002|2001|2000|
|net loss as reported|$ -1141879 ( 1141879 )|$ -450094 ( 450094 )|$ -194628 ( 194628 )|
|less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect|-38126 ( 38126 )|-50540 ( 50540 )|-51186 ( 51186 )|
|pro-forma net loss|$ -1180005 ( 1180005 )|$ -500634 ( 500634 )|$ -245814 ( 245814 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported|$ -5.84 ( 5.84 )|$ -2.35 ( 2.35 )|$ -1.15 ( 1.15 )|
|basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma|$ -6.04 ( 6.04 )|$ -2.61 ( 2.61 )|$ -1.46 ( 1.46 )|
fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively . fair values were determined based on quoted market prices . the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation . the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs . the requirements of sfas no . 143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 . the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations . in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no . 144 supersedes sfas no . 121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions . sfas no . 144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no . 121 . in addition , sfas no . 144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no . 30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d . however , sfas no . 144 retains the requirement in apb no . 30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions . the scope of sfas no . 144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no . 142 . the company implemented sfas no . 144 on january 1 , 2002 . accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2000 to 2001?
Answer: | -0.03327 |
FINQA2831 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 3 ) refer to note 2 201csummary of significant accounting principles and practices 201d for further information . 13 . employee benefitsp y defined contribution savings plans aon maintains defined contribution savings plans for the benefit of its employees . the expense recognized for these plans is included in compensation and benefits in the consolidated statements of income . the expense for the significant plans in the u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canada is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|u.s .|$ 98|$ 105|$ 121|
|u.k .|45|43|43|
|netherlands and canada|25|25|27|
|total|$ 168|$ 173|$ 191|
pension and other postretirement benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension and postretirement health and welfare plans that provide retirement , medical , and life insurance benefits . the postretirement health care plans are contributory , with retiree contributions adjusted annually , and the aa life insurance and pension plans are generally noncontributory . the significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants. .
Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the expenses in the us to the total benefit expense
Answer: | 0.58333 |
FINQA2832 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: credit commitments the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s other commitments as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . in millions of dollars u.s . outside december 31 , december 31 .
|in millions of dollars|u.s .|outside u.s .|december 31 2008|december 31 2007|
|commercial and similar letters of credit|$ 2187|$ 6028|$ 8215|$ 9175|
|one- to four-family residential mortgages|628|309|937|4587|
|revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties|22591|2621|25212|35187|
|commercial real estate construction and land development|2084|618|2702|4834|
|credit card lines|867261|135176|1002437|1103535|
|commercial and other consumer loan commitments|217818|92179|309997|473631|
|total|$ 1112569|$ 236931|$ 1349500|$ 1630949|
the majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers 2019 maintaining specific credit standards . commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees . such fees ( net of certain direct costs ) are deferred and , upon exercise of the commitment , amortized over the life of the loan or , if exercise is deemed remote , amortized over the commitment period . commercial and similar letters of credit a commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments . citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay the supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit . when drawn , the customer then is required to reimburse citigroup . one- to four-family residential mortgages a one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase . revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit . a home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage . commercial real estate , construction and land development commercial real estate , construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects . both secured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line . in addition , undistributed loan proceeds , where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress , payments are also included in this line . however , this line only includes those extensions of credit that once funded will be classified as loans on the consolidated balance sheet . credit card lines citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards . the credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer . commercial and other consumer loan commitments commercial and other consumer loan commitments include commercial commitments to make or purchase loans , to purchase third-party receivables and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities . amounts include $ 140 billion and $ 259 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . in addition , included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt ( measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower ) than is generally considered normal for other companies . this type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions , management buy-outs and similar transactions. .
Question: what percentage of citigroup 2019s total other commitments as of december 31 , 2008 are comprised of credit card lines?
Answer: | 0.74282 |
FINQA2833 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 2009|december 31 2008|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 3338|$ 4273|
|aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance|55|138|
|balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|4|9|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due|3|2|
the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .
Question: what was the percentage change in carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: | -0.21882 |
FINQA2834 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consumer lending asset classes home equity and residential real estate loan classes we use several credit quality indicators , including delinquency information , nonperforming loan information , updated credit scores , originated and updated ltv ratios , and geography , to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes . we evaluate mortgage loan performance by source originators and loan servicers . a summary of asset quality indicators follows : delinquency/delinquency rates : we monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans . see the asset quality section of this note 3 for additional information . nonperforming loans : we monitor trending of nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans . see the asset quality section of this note 3 for additional information . credit scores : we use a national third-party provider to update fico credit scores for home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans at least quarterly . the updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports , which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes . ltv ( inclusive of combined loan-to-value ( cltv ) for first and subordinate lien positions ) : at least annually , we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated ltv ratio . for open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values , more frequent valuations may occur . we examine ltv migration and stratify ltv into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes . historically , we used , and we continue to use , a combination of original ltv and updated ltv for internal risk management and reporting purposes ( e.g. , line management , loss mitigation strategies ) . in addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates , given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated ltvs may be based upon management 2019s assumptions ( e.g. , if an updated ltv is not provided by the third-party service provider , home price index ( hpi ) changes will be incorporated in arriving at management 2019s estimate of updated ltv ) . geography : geographic concentrations are monitored to evaluate and manage exposures . loan purchase programs are sensitive to , and focused within , certain regions to manage geographic exposures and associated risks . a combination of updated fico scores , originated and updated ltv ratios and geographic location assigned to home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans is used to monitor the risk in the loan classes . loans with higher fico scores and lower ltvs tend to have a lower level of risk . conversely , loans with lower fico scores , higher ltvs , and in certain geographic locations tend to have a higher level of risk . consumer purchased impaired loan class estimates of the expected cash flows primarily determine the valuation of consumer purchased impaired loans . consumer cash flow estimates are influenced by a number of credit related items , which include , but are not limited to : estimated real estate values , payment patterns , updated fico scores , the current economic environment , updated ltv ratios and the date of origination . these key factors are monitored to help ensure that concentrations of risk are managed and cash flows are maximized . see note 4 purchased loans for additional information . table 63 : home equity and residential real estate balances in millions december 31 december 31 .
|in millions|december 312014|december 31 2013|
|home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 excluding purchased impaired loans ( a )|$ 43348|$ 44376|
|home equity and residential real estate loans 2013 purchased impaired loans ( b )|4541|5548|
|government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages ( a )|1188|1704|
|purchase accounting adjustments 2013 purchased impaired loans|7|-116 ( 116 )|
|total home equity and residential real estate loans ( a )|$ 49084|$ 51512|
( a ) represents recorded investment . ( b ) represents outstanding balance . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 133 .
Question: were government insured or guaranteed residential real estate mortgages greater on 12/31/ 2014 than on12/31/ 2013?
Answer: | no |
FINQA2835 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is listed and traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cipg 201d . as of february 13 , 2019 , there were approximately 10000 registered holders of our outstanding common stock . on february 13 , 2019 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.235 per share , payable on march 15 , 2019 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2019 . although it is the board 2019s current intention to declare and pay future dividends , there can be no assurance that such additional dividends will in fact be declared and paid . any and the amount of any such declaration is at the discretion of the board and will depend upon factors such as our earnings , financial position and cash requirements . equity compensation plans see item 12 for information about our equity compensation plans . transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2018 to december 31 , 2018 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .
||total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1|average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2|total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3|maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3|
|october 1 - 31|3824|$ 23.30|2014|$ 338421933|
|november 1 - 30|1750|$ 23.77|2014|$ 338421933|
|december 1 - 31|2014|2014|2014|$ 338421933|
|total|5574|$ 23.45|2014||
1 the total number of shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , repurchased were withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock- based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum in the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations by the sum of the number of withheld shares . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . in february 2018 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock , which was in addition to any amounts remaining under the 2017 share repurchase program . on july 2 , 2018 , in connection with the announcement of the acxiom acquisition , we announced that share repurchases will be suspended for a period of time in order to reduce the increased debt levels incurred in conjunction with the acquisition , and no shares were repurchased pursuant to the share repurchase programs in the periods reflected . there are no expiration dates associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: what was the percentage decrease from october to november on total number of share purchased?
Answer: | 54.2364 |
FINQA2836 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: utilized . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , a non-cash impairment charge of $ 4.1 million was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 for the excess machinery . this charge is included as a separate line item in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations . there was no change to useful lives and related depreciation expense of the remaining assets as the company believes these estimates are currently reflective of the period the assets will be used in operations . 7 . warranties the company generally provides a one-year warranty on sequencing , genotyping and gene expression systems . at the time revenue is recognized , the company establishes an accrual for estimated warranty expenses associated with system sales . this expense is recorded as a component of cost of product revenue . estimated warranty expenses associated with extended maintenance contracts are recorded as cost of revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance contract . changes in the company 2019s reserve for product warranties from january 1 , 2006 through december 28 , 2008 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|balance as of january 1 2006|$ 751|
|additions charged to cost of revenue|1379|
|repairs and replacements|-1134 ( 1134 )|
|balance as of december 31 2006|996|
|additions charged to cost of revenue|4939|
|repairs and replacements|-2219 ( 2219 )|
|balance as of december 30 2007|3716|
|additions charged to cost of revenue|13044|
|repairs and replacements|-8557 ( 8557 )|
|balance as of december 28 2008|$ 8203|
8 . convertible senior notes on february 16 , 2007 , the company issued $ 400.0 million principal amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) convertible senior notes due 2014 ( the notes ) , which included the exercise of the initial purchasers 2019 option to purchase up to an additional $ 50.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes . the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and offering expenses , were $ 390.3 million . the company will pay 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) interest per annum on the principal amount of the notes , payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the company made interest payments of $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million on february 15 , 2008 and august 15 , 2008 , respectively . the notes mature on february 15 , the notes will be convertible into cash and , if applicable , shares of the company 2019s common stock , $ 0.01 par value per share , based on a conversion rate , subject to adjustment , of 45.8058 shares per $ 1000 principal amount of notes ( which represents a conversion price of $ 21.83 per share ) , only in the following circumstances and to the following extent : ( 1 ) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading period ( the measurement period ) in which the trading price per note for each day of such measurement period was less than 97% ( 97 % ) of the product of the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock and the conversion rate on each such day ; ( 2 ) during any calendar quarter after the calendar quarter ending march 30 , 2007 , if the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the sum of the interest payments in 2008 in millions .
Answer: | 2.5 |
FINQA2837 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year:|pre-tax catastrophe losses|
|( dollars in millions )||
|2016|$ 301.2|
|2015|53.8|
|2014|56.3|
|2013|194.0|
|2012|410.0|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in the last five years?\\n
Answer: | 1015.3 |
FINQA2838 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: bhge 2017 form 10-k | 27 the short term . we do , however , view the long term economics of the lng industry as positive given our outlook for supply and demand . 2022 refinery , petrochemical and industrial projects : in refining , we believe large , complex refineries should gain advantage in a more competitive , oversupplied landscape in 2018 as the industry globalizes and refiners position to meet local demand and secure export potential . in petrochemicals , we continue to see healthy demand and cost-advantaged supply driving projects forward in 2018 . the industrial market continues to grow as outdated infrastructure is replaced , policy changes come into effect and power is decentralized . we continue to see growing demand across these markets in 2018 . we have other segments in our portfolio that are more correlated with different industrial metrics such as our digital solutions business . overall , we believe our portfolio is uniquely positioned to compete across the value chain , and deliver unique solutions for our customers . we remain optimistic about the long-term economics of the industry , but are continuing to operate with flexibility given our expectations for volatility and changing assumptions in the near term . in 2016 , solar and wind net additions exceeded coal and gas for the first time and it continued throughout 2017 . governments may change or may not continue incentives for renewable energy additions . in the long term , renewables' cost decline may accelerate to compete with new-built fossil capacity , however , we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business in the foreseeable future . despite the near-term volatility , the long-term outlook for our industry remains strong . we believe the world 2019s demand for energy will continue to rise , and the supply of energy will continue to increase in complexity , requiring greater service intensity and more advanced technology from oilfield service companies . as such , we remain focused on delivering innovative cost-efficient solutions that deliver step changes in operating and economic performance for our customers . business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . amounts reported in millions in graphs within this report are computed based on the amounts in hundreds . as a result , the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. .
||2017|2016|2015|
|brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )|$ 54.12|$ 43.64|$ 52.32|
|wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )|50.80|43.29|48.66|
|natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )|2.99|2.52|2.62|
brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 54.12 $ 43.64 $ 52.32 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 50.80 43.29 48.66 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 2.99 2.52 2.62 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel .
Question: what are the natural gas prices as a percentage of wti oil prices in 2016?
Answer: | 0.05821 |
FINQA2839 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: human capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. .
||2013|2012|
|debt to capital|57.9% ( 57.9 % )|58.7% ( 58.7 % )|
|effect of excluding securitization bonds|( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )|( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )|
|debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )|56.3% ( 56.3 % )|56.9% ( 56.9 % )|
|effect of subtracting cash|( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )|( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )|
|net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )|54.8% ( 54.8 % )|55.8% ( 55.8 % )|
( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the percentage change in debt-to-capital ratio from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | -0.01363 |
FINQA2840 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the intangible assets identified that were determined to have value as a result of our analysis of allied 2019s projected revenue streams and their related profits include customer relationships , franchise agreements , other municipal agreements , non-compete agreements and trade names . the fair values for these intangible assets are reflected in the previous table . other intangible assets were identified that are considered to be components of either property and equipment or goodwill under u.s . gaap , including the value of the permitted and probable airspace at allied 2019s landfills ( property and equipment ) , the going concern element of allied 2019s business ( goodwill ) and its assembled workforce ( goodwill ) . the going concern element represents the ability of an established business to earn a higher rate of return on an assembled collection of net assets than would be expected if those assets had to be acquired separately . a substantial portion of this going concern element acquired is represented by allied 2019s infrastructure of market-based collection routes and its related integrated waste transfer and disposal channels , whose value has been included in goodwill . all of the goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of allied will not be deductible for income tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the merger had been completed as of january 1 , 2007 . the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . furthermore , the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisition ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) ( unaudited ) .
||year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )|year ended december 31 2007 ( unaudited )|
|revenue|$ 9362.2|$ 9244.9|
|net income|285.7|423.2|
|basic earnings per share|0.76|1.10|
|diluted earnings per share|0.75|1.09|
the unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . assets held for sale as a condition of the merger with allied , the department of justice ( doj ) required us to divest of certain assets and related liabilities . as such , we classified these assets and liabilities as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 . certain of the legacy republic assets classified as held for sale were adjusted to their estimated fair values less costs to sell and resulted in the recognition of an asset impairment loss of $ 1.8 million and $ 6.1 million in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the assets held for sale related to operations that were allied 2019s were recorded at their estimated fair values in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2008 in republic services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what was the percent of the decline in the asset impairment loss for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008
Answer: | -10.4 |
FINQA2841 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: .
||june 27 2013|december 31 2013|
|cdw corp|$ 100|$ 138|
|s&p midcap 400 index|100|118|
|cdw peers|100|113|
use of proceeds from registered securities on july 2 , 2013 , the company completed an ipo of its common stock in which it issued and sold 23250000 shares of common stock . on july 31 , 2013 , the company completed the sale of an additional 3487500 shares of common stock to the underwriters of the ipo pursuant to the underwriters 2019 july 26 , 2013 exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . such shares were registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , pursuant to the company 2019s registration statement on form s-1 ( file 333-187472 ) , which was declared effective by the sec on june 26 , 2013 . the shares of common stock are listed on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201ccdw . 201d the company 2019s shares of common stock were sold to the underwriters at a price of $ 17.00 per share in the ipo and upon the exercise of the overallotment option , which together , generated aggregate net proceeds of $ 424.7 million to the company after deducting $ 29.8 million in underwriting discounts , expenses and transaction costs . using a portion of the net proceeds from the ipo ( exclusive of proceeds from the exercise of the overallotment option ) , the company paid a $ 24.4 million termination fee to affiliates of madison dearborn partners , llc and providence equity partners , l.l.c . in connection with the termination of the management services agreement with such entities that was effective upon completion of the ipo , redeemed $ 175.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2018 , and redeemed $ 146.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes due 2017 . the redemption price of the senior secured notes due 2018 was 108.0% ( 108.0 % ) of the principal amount redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . the company used cash on hand to pay such accrued and unpaid interest . the redemption price of the senior subordinated notes due 2017 was 106.268% ( 106.268 % ) of the principal amount redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . the company used cash on hand to pay such accrued and unpaid interest . on october 18 , 2013 , proceeds from the overallotment option exercise of $ 56.0 million and cash on hand were used to redeem $ 155.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes due 2017 . the redemption price of the senior subordinated notes due 2017 was 104.178% ( 104.178 % ) of the principal amount redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . the company used cash on hand to pay such redemption premium and accrued and unpaid interest . j.p . morgan securities llc , barclays capital inc . and goldman , sachs & co . acted as joint book-running managers of the ipo and as representatives of the underwriters . deutsche bank securities inc . and morgan stanley & co . llc acted as additional book-running managers in the ipo . robert w . baird & co . incorporated , raymond james & associates , inc. , william blair & company , l.l.c. , needham & company , llc , stifel , nicolaus & company , incorporated , loop capital markets llc and the williams capital group , l.p . acted as managing underwriters in the ipo. .
Question: how many ipo shares did the company sell in july 2013?
Answer: | 26737500.0 |
FINQA2842 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .
||10/28/2007|10/26/2008|10/25/2009|10/31/2010|10/30/2011|10/28/2012|
|applied materials|100.00|61.22|71.06|69.23|72.37|62.92|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|63.90|70.17|81.76|88.37|101.81|
|rdg semiconductor composite index|100.00|54.74|68.59|84.46|91.33|82.37|
dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the roi of s&p500 if the investment takes place in october 2007 and it is sold in october 2010?
Answer: | -0.1824 |
FINQA2843 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: while we have remediated the previously-identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting , we may identify other material weaknesses in the future . in november 2017 , we restated our consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 in order to correctly classify cash receipts from the payments on sold receivables ( which are cash receipts on the underlying trade receivables that have already been securitized ) to cash provided by investing activities ( from cash provided by operating activities ) within our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows . in connection with these restatements , management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the misapplication of accounting standards update 2016-15 . specifically , we did not maintain effective controls over the adoption of new accounting standards , including communication with the appropriate individuals in coming to our conclusions on the application of new accounting standards . as a result of this material weakness , our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 . while we have remediated the material weakness and our management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of december 30 , 2017 , there can be no assurance that our controls will remain adequate . the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations , including judgments used in decision-making , the nature and complexity of the transactions we undertake , assumptions about the likelihood of future events , the soundness of our systems , cost limitations , and other limitations . if other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future or we otherwise must restate our financial statements , it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations or financial condition , restrict our ability to access the capital markets , require us to expend significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies , subject us to fines , penalties , investigations or judgments , harm our reputation , or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 30 , 2017 , we operated 83 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 80 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 30 , 2017 was: .
||owned|leased|
|united states|41|1|
|canada|2|2014|
|europe|11|2014|
|rest of world|26|2|
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: what percent of owned facilities are in the us?
Answer: | 0.5125 |
FINQA2844 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) restructuring accrual as a result of the cytyc merger , the company assumed previous cytyc management approved restructuring plans designed to reduce future operating expenses by consolidating its mountain view , california operations into its existing operations in costa rica and massachusetts as well as restructuring plans relating to cytyc 2019s historical acquisitions completed in march 2007 . in connection with these plans , the company assumed a total liability of approximately $ 4658 . during the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 , the company did not incur any additional restructuring costs related to retention costs for these employees . as a result of the third wave acquisition , the company assumed previous third wave management approved restructuring plans designed to reduce future operating expenses . in connection with these plans , the company assumed a total liability related to termination benefits of approximately $ 7509 . the company did not incur any additional restructuring costs related to retention costs for these employees from the date of acquisition through september 27 , 2008 . we anticipate that these costs will be paid in full during fiscal 2009 . additionally , the company recorded a liability related to the cytyc merger in accordance with eitf 95-3 as detailed below , primarily related to the termination of certain employees as well as minimum inventory purchase commitments and other contractual obligations for which business activities have been discontinued . during the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 the company incurred approximately $ 6.4 million of expense related to the resignation of the chairman of the board of directors , which is not included in the table below ( see note 12 ) . changes in the restructuring accrual for the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 were as follows : twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 termination benefits .
|other|twelve months ended september 27 2008 other|twelve months ended september 27 2008|
|beginning balance|$ 2014|$ 105|
|cytyc balance acquired october 22 2007|2014|4658|
|third wave balance acquired july 24 2008|261|7029|
|provided for under eitf no . 95-3|1820|1020|
|adjustments|-382 ( 382 )|-270 ( 270 )|
|payments|-817 ( 817 )|-11233 ( 11233 )|
|ending balance|$ 882|$ 1309|
as of the dates of acquisition of aeg elektrofotografie gmbh ( 201caeg 201d ) , r2 technology , inc . ( 201cr2 201d ) and suros surgical , inc . ( 201csuros 201d ) ( see note 3 ) , management of the company implemented and finalized plans to involuntarily terminate certain employees of the acquired companies . these plans resulted in a liability for costs associated with an employee severance arrangement of approximately $ 3135 in accordance with eitf issue no . 95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination . as of september 29 , 2007 , all amounts other than $ 105 had been paid . the company had made full payment on this remaining liability as of september 27 , 2008 . advertising costs advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred . the company does not have any direct-response advertising . advertising costs , which include trade shows and conventions , were approximately $ 15281 , $ 6683 and $ 5003 for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and were included in selling and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what is the growth rate in advertising costs from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: | 0.3358 |
FINQA2845 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adjusted ebitda increased $ 574 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , in 2017 primarily from : 2022 an increase in branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our un- carrier initiatives , the ongoing success of our promotional activities , and the continued strength of our metropcs brand ; 2022 higher wholesale revenues ; and 2022 higher other revenues ; partially offset by 2022 higher selling , general and administrative expenses ; 2022 lower gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $ 600 million ; gains on disposal were $ 235 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , compared to $ 835 million in the same period in 2016 ; 2022 higher cost of services expense ; 2022 higher net losses on equipment ; and 2022 the negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $ 201 million , net of insurance recoveries . adjusted ebitda increased $ 2.8 billion , or 36% ( 36 % ) , in 2016 primarily from : 2022 increased branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our un-carrier initiatives and the ongoing success of our promotional activities ; 2022 higher gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $ 672 million ; gains on disposal were $ 835 million in 2016 compared to $ 163 million in 2015 ; 2022 lower losses on equipment ; and 2022 focused cost control and synergies realized from the metropcs business combination , primarily in cost of services ; partially offset by 2022 higher selling , general and administrative . effective january 1 , 2017 , the imputed discount on eip receivables , which was previously recognized within interest income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income , is recognized within other revenues in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income . due to this presentation , the imputed discount on eip receivables is included in adjusted ebitda . see note 1 - summary of significant accounting policies of notes to the consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k for further information . we have applied this change retrospectively and presented the effect on the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , in the table below. .
|( in millions )|year ended december 31 2016 as filed|year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle|year ended december 31 2016 as adjusted|year ended december 31 2016 as filed|year ended december 31 2016 change in accounting principle|as adjusted|
|operating income|$ 3802|$ 248|$ 4050|$ 2065|$ 414|$ 2479|
|interest income|261|-248 ( 248 )|13|420|-414 ( 414 )|6|
|net income|1460|2014|1460|733|2014|733|
|net income as a percentage of service revenue|5% ( 5 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|5% ( 5 % )|3% ( 3 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|3% ( 3 % )|
|adjusted ebitda|$ 10391|$ 248|$ 10639|$ 7393|$ 414|$ 7807|
|adjusted ebitda margin ( adjusted ebitda divided by service revenues )|37% ( 37 % )|1% ( 1 % )|38% ( 38 % )|30% ( 30 % )|1% ( 1 % )|31% ( 31 % )|
adjusted ebitda margin ( adjusted ebitda divided by service revenues ) 37% ( 37 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 38% ( 38 % ) 30% ( 30 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 31% ( 31 % ) liquidity and capital resources our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations , proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and common stock , capital leases , the sale of certain receivables , financing arrangements of vendor payables which effectively extend payment terms and secured and unsecured revolving credit facilities with dt. .
Question: how much service revenue was generated in 2016?
Answer: | 29200.0 |
FINQA2846 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2017 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2012 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .
||12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|12/31/2016|12/31/2017|
|hum|$ 100|$ 152|$ 214|$ 267|$ 307|$ 377|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 132|$ 150|$ 153|$ 171|$ 208|
|peer group|$ 100|$ 137|$ 175|$ 186|$ 188|$ 238|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the percent of the growth in the stock total return performance for hum from 2013 to 2014
Answer: | 62.0 |
FINQA2847 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .
||number of shares|weighted average grant date fair value|
|outstanding at december 31 2009|116677|$ 280|
|granted|134245|275|
|vested|-34630 ( 34630 )|257|
|cancelled|-19830 ( 19830 )|260|
|outstanding at december 31 2010|196462|283|
the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .
Question: considering the weighted average grant date fair value , whats is the difference between how many actual shares vested during the year of 2010 and how many vested based on the average grant fair value?
Answer: | 5447.82101 |
FINQA2848 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: pre-construction costs , interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs . the authorized costs were being recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in october 2012 . the unrecovered balance of project costs incurred , including cost of capital , net of surcharges totaled $ 85 million and $ 89 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . pursuant to the general rate case approved in december 2018 , approval was granted to reset the twenty-year amortization period to begin january 1 , 2018 and to establish an annual revenue requirement of $ 8 million to be recovered through base rates . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in california during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in new jersey . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . as a result of the prepayment by american water capital corp. , the company 2019s wholly owned finance subsidiary ( 201cawcc 201d ) , of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due upon maturity on december 21 , 2018 ( the 201cseries c notes 201d ) , 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series e senior notes due march 29 , 2019 ( the 201cseries e notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series f senior notes due december 21 , 2022 ( the 201cseries f notes , 201d and together with the series e notes , the 201cseries notes 201d ) , a make-whole premium of $ 10 million was paid to the holders of the series notes on september 11 , 2018 . substantially all of these early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets , as the company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: .
||2018|2017|
|income taxes recovered through rates|$ 1279|$ 1242|
|removal costs recovered through rates|309|315|
|postretirement benefit liability|209|33|
|pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts|46|48|
|tcja reserve on revenue|36|2014|
|other|28|26|
|total regulatory liabilities|$ 1907|$ 1664|
.
Question: by how much did total regulatory liabilities increase from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.14603 |
FINQA2849 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) .
|2018|$ 27000|
|2019|63000|
|2020|25000|
|2021|86250|
|2022|2014|
|2023 and thereafter|600000|
|total scheduled maturities of long term debt|$ 801250|
|current maturities of long term debt|$ 27000|
interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .
Question: what was the percentage change in interest expense net from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | 0.80822 |
FINQA2850 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
|millions|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2017|$ 461|$ 221|
|2018|390|193|
|2019|348|179|
|2020|285|187|
|2021|245|158|
|later years|1314|417|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 3043|$ 1355|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-250 ( 250 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 1105|
approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: in 2016 what was the percent of the future total minimum operating lease payments that was due in 2017
Answer: | 0.1515 |
FINQA2851 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments .
||benefit payments|expected subsidy receipts|net benefit payments|
|2009|$ 2641|$ 77|$ 2564|
|2010|3139|91|3048|
|2011|3561|115|3446|
|2012|3994|140|3854|
|2013|4357|169|4188|
|2014 2013 2018|25807|1269|24538|
the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .
Question: considering the years 2009 and 2010 , what is the difference between the growth of the benefit payments and the expected subsidy receipts?
Answer: | 0.00675 |
FINQA2852 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of our common stock registered pursuant to section 12 of the securities exchange act of 1934 during the quarter ended december 31 , 2014 . period ( a ) number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions ) .
|period ( a )|total number of shares purchased|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b )|amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions )|
|september 29 2014 2013 october 26 2014|399259|$ 176.96|397911|$ 3825|
|october 27 2014 2013 november 30 2014|504300|$ 187.74|456904|$ 3739|
|december 1 2014 2013 december 31 2014|365683|$ 190.81|357413|$ 3671|
|total|1269242 ( c )|$ 185.23|1212228|$ 3671|
total 1269242 ( c ) $ 185.23 1212228 $ 3671 ( a ) we close our books and records on the last sunday of each month to align our financial closing with our business processes , except for the month of december , as our fiscal year ends on december 31 . as a result , our fiscal months often differ from the calendar months . for example , september 29 , 2014 was the first day of our october 2014 fiscal month . ( b ) in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share not exceeding the then-current market prices . on september 25 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized a $ 2.0 billion increase to the program . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . we also may make purchases under the program pursuant to rule 10b5-1 plans . the program does not have an expiration date . ( c ) during the quarter ended december 31 , 2014 , the total number of shares purchased included 57014 shares that were transferred to us by employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units . these purchases were made pursuant to a separate authorization by our board of directors and are not included within the program. .
Question: what is the growth rate in the average price of the purchased shares from october to december 2014?
Answer: | 0.07827 |
FINQA2853 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .
|country|number of owned sites ( approx )|coverage area|
|united states|19400|coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors .|
|mexico|2500|coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas including mexico city monterrey guadalajara and acapulco .|
|brazil|1100|coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil including sao paulo rio de janeiro brasilia and curitiba .|
|india|200|initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) .|
( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .
Question: what portion of total owned sites is located in united states?
Answer: | 0.83621 |
FINQA2854 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .
||2009|2008|
|balance at january 1|$ 86|$ 70|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|2|5|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|5|12|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-11 ( 11 )|-11 ( 11 )|
|settlements|-10 ( 10 )|-4 ( 4 )|
|lapse of statute of limitations|-3 ( 3 )|-1 ( 1 )|
|acquisitions|6|21|
|foreign currency translation|2|-6 ( 6 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 77|$ 86|
as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .
Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the increase observed in the liability for interest?
Answer: | 0.28571 |
FINQA2855 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 ( 1 ) a u.s . subsidiary of the company has a defined benefit obligation of $ 764 million and $ 679 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and uses salary bands to determine future benefit costs rather than rates of compensation increases . rates of compensation increases in the table above do not include amounts related to this specific defined benefit plan . ( 2 ) includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost , but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation . the company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors , which include the targeted asset allocation percentages , historic returns and expected future returns . the measurement of pension obligations , costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions . these assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants , taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience . these assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions . the assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors : 2022 discount rates ; 2022 salary growth ; 2022 retirement rates ; 2022 inflation ; 2022 expected return on plan assets ; and 2022 mortality rates . the effects of actual results differing from the company 2019s assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and , therefore , generally affect the company 2019s recognized expense in such future periods . sensitivity of the company 2019s pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below . note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2012 . they also may not be additive , so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown . the funded status as of december 31 , 2012 is affected by the assumptions as of that date . pension expense for 2012 is affected by the december 31 , 2011 assumptions . the impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the table below ( in millions ) : .
|increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate|$ -48 ( 48 )|
|decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate|38|
|increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets|-47 ( 47 )|
|decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets|47|
.
Question: what was the net reduction in defined benefit obligations between december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , in millions?
Answer: | 85.0 |
FINQA2856 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|tier 1 capital|$ 72471|$ 66977|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13632|$ 13429|
|total capital|$ 86103|$ 80406|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 433226|$ 399928|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|
|total capital ratio|19.9% ( 19.9 % )|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|8.1% ( 8.1 % )|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|
revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: in millions for 2013 and 2012 , what was the maximum tier 2 capital?
Answer: | 13632.0 |
FINQA2857 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
||12/9/2013|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|
|american airlines group inc .|$ 100|$ 103|$ 219|
|amex airline index|100|102|152|
|s&p 500|100|102|114|
.
Question: by how much did american airlines group inc . outperform the amex airline index over the 3 year period?
Answer: | 0.67 |
FINQA2858 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
||12/9/2013|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|
|american airlines group inc .|$ 100|$ 103|$ 219|
|amex airline index|100|102|152|
|s&p 500|100|102|114|
.
Question: what was the 3 year return of american airlines group inc.?
Answer: | 1.19 |
FINQA2859 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use . the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years . amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: .
|fiscal years|amortization expense|
|2010|$ 5425|
|2011|$ 1430|
g . grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies . these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants . capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset . employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company . h . translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency . gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s . dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income . transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s . dollar . foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 . i . derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates . such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s . dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound . these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature . the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less . hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly . derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified . as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings . any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense . additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency . changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the growth rate in amortization expense in 2009?
Answer: | -0.2043 |
FINQA2860 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the retail electric price variance resulted from rate increases primarily at entergy louisiana effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity costs . the formula rate plan filing is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from increased electricity usage in the residential and commercial sectors , including increased usage during the unbilled sales period . billed retail electricity usage increased by a total of 1591 gwh , an increase of 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) . see "critical accounting estimates" herein and note 1 to the financial statements for a discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in entergy new orleans' fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the increase is also due to purchased power costs deferred at entergy louisiana and entergy new orleans as a result of the re-pricing , retroactive to 2003 , of purchased power agreements among entergy system companies as directed by the ferc . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late-2006 . the purchased power capacity variance is due to higher capacity charges and new purchased power contracts that began in mid-2006 . a portion of the variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs and is offset in base revenues due to base rate increases implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges at entergy louisiana , as discussed above . the net wholesale revenue variance is due primarily to 1 ) more energy available for resale at entergy new orleans in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina and 2 ) the inclusion in 2006 revenue of sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand gulf . the net wholesale revenue variance is partially offset by the effect of lower wholesale revenues in the third quarter 2006 due to an october 2006 ferc order requiring entergy arkansas to make a refund to a coal plant co-owner resulting from a contract dispute . non-utility nuclear following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2006 net revenue|$ 1388|
|realized price changes|264|
|palisades acquisition|209|
|volume variance ( other than palisades )|-56 ( 56 )|
|other|34|
|2007 net revenue|$ 1839|
as shown in the table above , net revenue increased for non-utility nuclear by $ 451 million , or 33% ( 33 % ) , for 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to higher pricing in its contracts to sell power and additional production available resulting from the acquisition of the palisades plant in april 2007 . included in the palisades net revenue is $ 50 million of amortization of the palisades purchased power agreement in 2007 , which is non-cash revenue and is discussed in note 15 to the financial statements . the increase was partially offset by the effect on revenues of four .
Question: what percent of 2007 net revenue did the amortization of purchase power account for?
Answer: | 0.02719 |
FINQA2861 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: .
|in millions|2018|2017|2016|
|weighted-average number of basic shares|95.0|95.1|95.8|
|shares issuable under incentive stock plans|0.7|0.9|1.1|
|weighted-average number of diluted shares|95.7|96.0|96.9|
at december 31 , 2018 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 net revenues net revenues are recognized based on the satisfaction of performance obligations under the terms of a contract . a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct product or to provide a service , or a bundle of products or services , to a customer , and is the unit of account under asc 606 . the company has two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services . approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of consolidated net revenues involve contracts with a single performance obligation , which is the transfer of control of a product or bundle of products to a customer . transfer of control typically occurs when goods are shipped from the company's facilities or at other predetermined control transfer points ( for instance , destination terms ) . net revenues are measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring control of the products and takes into account variable consideration , such as sales incentive programs including discounts and volume rebates . the existence of these programs does not preclude revenue recognition but does require the company's best estimate of the variable consideration to be made based on expected activity , as these items are reserved for as a deduction to net revenues over time based on the company's historical rates of providing these incentives and annual forecasted sales volumes . the company also offers a standard warranty with most product sales and the value of such warranty is included in the contractual price . the corresponding cost of the warranty obligation is accrued as a liability ( see note 20 ) . the company's remaining net revenues involve services , including installation and consulting . unlike the single performance obligation to ship a product or bundle of products , the service revenue stream delays revenue recognition until the service performance obligations are satisfied . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied , which could include acceptance terms specified in the arrangement being fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , no adjustments related to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were recorded . upon adoption of asc 606 , the company used the practical expedients to omit the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less and for contracts where the company has the right to invoice for performance completed to date . the transaction price is not adjusted for the effects of a significant financing component , as the time period between control transfer of goods and services is less than one year . sales , value-added and other similar taxes collected by the company are excluded from net revenues . the company has also elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related goods transfers as fulfillment activities instead of performance obligations . these activities are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the company 2019s payment terms are generally consistent with the industries in which their businesses operate . the following table shows the company's net revenues for the years ended december 31 , based on the two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services , disaggregated by business segment . net revenues are shown by tangible product sales and services , as contract terms , conditions and economic factors affecting the nature , amount , timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flows are substantially similar within each of the two principal revenue streams: .
Question: considering the years 2016-2018 , what is the average value of diluted earnings per share issuable under incentive stock plans?
Answer: | 0.9 |
FINQA2862 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2010 2009 .
|millions|dec . 31 2010|dec . 31 2009|
|accounts payable|$ 677|$ 612|
|dividends and interest|383|347|
|accrued wages and vacation|357|339|
|income and other taxes|337|224|
|accrued casualty costs|325|379|
|equipment rents payable|86|89|
|other|548|480|
|total accounts payable and other currentliabilities|$ 2713|$ 2470|
13 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our consolidated financial statements. .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the total accounts payable and other current liabilities applicable
Answer: | 0.24954 |
FINQA2863 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we completed the previously announced divestiture of the is&gs business , which merged with a subsidiary of leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi- step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange . the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos . as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock . we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction . based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares . in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses . the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 . the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction . as a result of the transaction , we recognized a net gain of approximately $ 1.2 billion . the net gain represents the $ 2.5 billion fair value of the shares of lockheed martin common stock exchanged and retired as part of the exchange offer , plus the $ 1.8 billion one-time special cash payment , less the net book value of the is&gs business of about $ 3.0 billion at august 16 , 2016 and other adjustments of about $ 100 million . the final gain is subject to certain post-closing adjustments , including final working capital , indemnification , and tax adjustments , which we expect to complete in 2017 . we classified the operating results of our is&gs business as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with u.s . gaap , as the divestiture of this business represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on our operations and financial results . however , the cash flows generated by the is&gs business have not been reclassified in our consolidated statements of cash flows as we retained this cash as part of the transaction . the carrying amounts of major classes of the is&gs business assets and liabilities that were classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in millions ) : .
|receivables net|$ 807|
|inventories net|143|
|other current assets|19|
|property plant and equipment net|101|
|goodwill|2881|
|intangible assets|125|
|other noncurrent assets|54|
|total assets of the disposal group|$ 4130|
|accounts payable|$ -229 ( 229 )|
|customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred|-285 ( 285 )|
|salaries benefits and payroll taxes|-209 ( 209 )|
|other current liabilities|-225 ( 225 )|
|deferred income taxes|-145 ( 145 )|
|other noncurrent liabilities|-60 ( 60 )|
|total liabilities of the disposal group|$ -1153 ( 1153 )|
.
Question: what percentage of the total assets of the disposal group were attributable to goodwill?
Answer: | 0.69758 |
FINQA2864 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|net sales|$ 8367|$ 8846|$ 9381|
|operating profit|759|808|874|
|operating margins|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.3% ( 9.3 % )|
|backlog at year-end|8300|8700|9300|
2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .
Question: as part of the overall total decline in net sales what was the percent of the offsetting increase to the overall decrease in the sale
Answer: | 0.41718 |
FINQA2865 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 .
|millions|dec . 31 2015|dec . 31 2014|
|accounts payable|$ 743|$ 877|
|income and other taxes payable|434|412|
|accrued wages and vacation|391|409|
|interest payable|208|178|
|accrued casualty costs|181|249|
|equipment rents payable|105|100|
|dividends payable [a]|-|438|
|other|550|640|
|total accounts payable and other current liabilities|$ 2612|$ 3303|
[a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .
Question: what was the percentage of the decline in the total accounts payable and other current liabilities from 2014 to 2015
Answer: | -0.2092 |
FINQA2866 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: recognition of deferred revenue related to sanofi-aventis 2019 $ 85.0 million up-front payment decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the november 2009 amendments to expand and extend the companies 2019 antibody collaboration . in connection with the november 2009 amendment of the discovery agreement , sanofi-aventis is funding up to $ 30 million of agreed-upon costs incurred by us to expand our manufacturing capacity at our rensselaer , new york facilities , of which $ 23.4 million was received or receivable from sanofi-aventis as of december 31 , 2010 . revenue related to these payments for such funding from sanofi-aventis is deferred and recognized as collaboration revenue prospectively over the related performance period in conjunction with the recognition of the original $ 85.0 million up-front payment . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 79.8 million of the sanofi-aventis payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . in august 2008 , we entered into a separate velocigene ae agreement with sanofi-aventis . in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 1.6 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively , in revenue related to this agreement . bayer healthcare collaboration revenue the collaboration revenue we earned from bayer healthcare , as detailed below , consisted of cost sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses , substantive performance milestone payments , and recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable $ 75.0 million up-front payment received in october 2006 and a $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 ( which , for the purpose of revenue recognition , was not considered substantive ) . years ended bayer healthcare collaboration revenue december 31 .
|bayer healthcare collaboration revenue|bayer healthcare collaboration revenue||
|( in millions )|2010|2009|
|cost-sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses|$ 45.5|$ 37.4|
|substantive performance milestone payments|20.0|20.0|
|recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front and other milestone payments|9.9|9.9|
|total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue|$ 75.4|$ 67.3|
cost-sharing of our vegf trap-eye development expenses with bayer healthcare increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to higher internal development activities and higher clinical development costs in connection with our phase 3 copernicus trial in crvo . in the fourth quarter of 2010 , we earned two $ 10.0 million substantive milestone payments from bayer healthcare for achieving positive 52-week results in the view 1 study and positive 6-month results in the copernicus study . in july 2009 , we earned a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment from bayer healthcare in connection with the dosing of the first patient in the copernicus study . in connection with the recognition of deferred revenue related to the $ 75.0 million up-front payment and $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 , as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 47.0 million of these payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . technology licensing revenue in connection with our velocimmune ae license agreements with astrazeneca and astellas , each of the $ 20.0 million annual , non-refundable payments were deferred upon receipt and recognized as revenue ratably over approximately the ensuing year of each agreement . in both 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 40.0 million of technology licensing revenue related to these agreements . in addition , in connection with the amendment and extension of our license agreement with astellas , in august 2010 , we received a $ 165.0 million up-front payment , which was deferred upon receipt and will be recognized as revenue ratably over a seven-year period beginning in mid-2011 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 176.6 million of these technology licensing payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . net product sales in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized as revenue $ 25.3 million and $ 18.4 million , respectively , of arcalyst ae net product sales for which both the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . the company had limited historical return experience for arcalyst ae beginning with initial sales in 2008 through the end of 2009 ; therefore , arcalyst ae net product sales were deferred until the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . effective in the first quarter of 2010 , the company determined that it had .
Question: what was the percentage change of total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: | 0.12036 |
FINQA2867 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2013|2012|
|net sales|$ 7147|$ 7153|$ 7579|
|operating profit|843|905|737|
|operating margins|11.8% ( 11.8 % )|12.7% ( 12.7 % )|9.7% ( 9.7 % )|
|backlog at year-end|$ 11700|$ 10800|$ 10700|
2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for mst in 2014?
Answer: | -0.00084 |
FINQA2868 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2016 , we had total outstanding indebtedness of $ 18.7 billion , with a current portion of $ 238.8 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we generated sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our capital expenditures and debt service obligations , as well as our required distributions . we believe the cash generated by operating activities during the year ending december 31 , 2017 will be sufficient to fund our required distributions , capital expenditures , debt service obligations ( interest and principal repayments ) and signed acquisitions . as of december 31 , 2016 , we had $ 423.0 million of cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 183.9 million was held by our joint ventures . while certain subsidiaries may pay us interest or principal on intercompany debt , it has not been our practice to repatriate earnings from our foreign subsidiaries primarily due to our ongoing expansion efforts and related capital needs . however , in the event that we do repatriate any funds , we may be required to accrue and pay taxes . cash flows from operating activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , cash provided by operating activities increased $ 520.6 million as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the primary factors that impacted cash provided by operating activities as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2015 , include : 2022 an increase in our operating profit of $ 490.8 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 67.1 million in cash paid for interest ; and 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 60.8 million in cash paid for taxes . for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , cash provided by operating activities increased $ 48.5 million as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the primary factors that impacted cash provided by operating activities as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2014 , include : 2022 an increase in our operating profit of $ 433.3 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 87.8 million in cash paid for taxes , driven primarily by the mipt one-time cash tax charge of $ 93.0 million ; 2022 a decrease in capital contributions , tenant settlements and other prepayments of approximately $ 99.0 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 29.9 million in cash paid for interest ; 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 34.9 million in termination and decommissioning fees ; 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 49.0 million in tenant receipts due to timing ; and 2022 a decrease due to the non-recurrence of a 2014 value added tax refund of approximately $ 60.3 million . cash flows from investing activities our significant investing activities during the year ended december 31 , 2016 are highlighted below : 2022 we spent approximately $ 1.1 billion for the viom acquisition . 2022 we spent $ 701.4 million for capital expenditures , as follows ( in millions ) : .
|discretionary capital projects ( 1 )|$ 149.7|
|ground lease purchases|153.3|
|capital improvements and corporate expenditures ( 2 )|126.7|
|redevelopment|147.4|
|start-up capital projects|124.3|
|total capital expenditures|$ 701.4|
_______________ ( 1 ) includes the construction of 1869 communications sites globally . ( 2 ) includes $ 18.9 million of capital lease payments included in repayments of notes payable , credit facilities , term loan , senior notes and capital leases in the cash flow from financing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows . our significant investing transactions in 2015 included the following : 2022 we spent $ 5.059 billion for the verizon transaction . 2022 we spent $ 796.9 million for the acquisition of 5483 communications sites from tim in brazil . 2022 we spent $ 1.1 billion for the acquisition of 4716 communications sites from certain of airtel 2019s subsidiaries in nigeria. .
Question: what portion of the total capital expenditures is related to start-up capital projects?
Answer: | 0.17722 |
FINQA2869 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis dividends or other distributions on its common stock . currently , all of entergy texas' retained earnings are available for distribution . sources of capital entergy texas' sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt or preferred stock issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy texas may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy texas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy texas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy gulf states , inc . filed with the ferc an application , on behalf of entergy texas , for authority to issue up to $ 200 million of short-term debt , up to $ 300 million of tax-exempt bonds , and up to $ 1.3 billion of other long- term securities , including common and preferred or preference stock and long-term debt . on november 8 , 2007 , the ferc issued orders granting the requested authority for a two-year period ending november 8 , 2009 . entergy texas' receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2008|2007|2006|2005|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|( $ 50794 )|$ 154176|$ 97277|$ 136545|
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy texas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 100 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 . as of december 31 , 2008 , $ 100 million was outstanding on the credit facility . in february 2009 , entergy texas repaid its credit facility with the proceeds from the bond issuance discussed below . on june 2 , 2008 and december 8 , 2008 , under the terms of the debt assumption agreement between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana that is discussed in note 5 to the financial statements , entergy texas paid at maturity $ 148.8 million and $ 160.3 million , respectively , of entergy gulf states louisiana first mortgage bonds , which results in a corresponding decrease in entergy texas' debt assumption liability . in december 2008 , entergy texas borrowed $ 160 million from its parent company , entergy corporation , under a $ 300 million revolving credit facility pursuant to an inter-company credit agreement between entergy corporation and entergy texas . this borrowing would have matured on december 3 , 2013 . entergy texas used these borrowings , together with other available corporate funds , to pay at maturity the portion of the $ 350 million floating rate series of first mortgage bonds due december 2008 that had been assumed by entergy texas , and that bond series is no longer outstanding . in january 2009 , entergy texas repaid its $ 160 million note payable to entergy corporation with the proceeds from the bond issuance discussed below . in january 2009 , entergy texas issued $ 500 million of 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) series mortgage bonds due february 2019 . entergy texas used a portion of the proceeds to repay its $ 160 million note payable to entergy corporation , to repay the $ 100 million outstanding on its credit facility , and to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool . entergy texas intends to use the remaining proceeds to repay on or prior to maturity approximately $ 70 million of obligations that had been assumed by entergy texas under the debt assumption agreement with entergy gulf states louisiana and for other general corporate purposes. .
Question: what is the annual expense for entergy texas incurred from the series mortgage bonds due february 2019 , in millions?
Answer: | 35.625 |
FINQA2870 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|12/31/2016|12/31/2017|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 146.54|$ 159.23|$ 148.89|$ 182.70|$ 195.75|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 132.38|$ 150.49|$ 152.55|$ 170.79|$ 208.06|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 141.38|$ 176.83|$ 147.19|$ 179.37|$ 213.49|
.
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Answer: | 0.9575 |
FINQA2871 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .
|company / index|2009|2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|
|teleflex incorporated|100|102|119|142|190|235|
|s&p 500 index|100|115|117|136|180|205|
|s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index|100|97|97|113|144|182|
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .
Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | 0.16667 |
FINQA2872 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies description of business host hotels & resorts , inc . operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust , or reit , with its operations conducted solely through host hotels & resorts , l.p . host hotels & resorts , l.p. , a delaware limited partnership , operates through an umbrella partnership structure , with host hotels & resorts , inc. , a maryland corporation , as its sole general partner . in the notes to the consolidated financial statements , we use the terms 201cwe 201d or 201cour 201d to refer to host hotels & resorts , inc . and host hotels & resorts , l.p . together , unless the context indicates otherwise . we also use the term 201chost inc . 201d to refer specifically to host hotels & resorts , inc . and the term 201chost l.p . 201d to refer specifically to host hotels & resorts , l.p . in cases where it is important to distinguish between host inc . and host l.p . host inc . holds approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of host l.p . 2019s partnership interests , or op units . consolidated portfolio as of december 31 , 2018 , the hotels in our consolidated portfolio are in the following countries: .
||hotels|
|united states|88|
|brazil|3|
|canada|2|
|total|93|
basis of presentation and principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of host inc. , host l.p . and their subsidiaries and controlled affiliates , including joint ventures and partnerships . we consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability to control them . for the majority of our hotel and real estate investments , we consider those control rights to be ( i ) approval or amendment of developments plans , ( ii ) financing decisions , ( iii ) approval or amendments of operating budgets , and ( iv ) investment strategy decisions . we also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they are variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) . if a subsidiary is a vie , it is subject to the consolidation framework specifically for vies . typically , the entity that has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance consolidates the vie . we consider an entity to be a vie if equity investors own an interest therein that does not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support . we review our subsidiaries and affiliates at least annually to determine if ( i ) they should be considered vies , and ( ii ) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in the characteristics thereof . three partnerships are considered vie 2019s , as the general partner maintains control over the decisions that most significantly impact the partnerships . the first vie is the operating partnership , host l.p. , which is consolidated by host inc. , of which host inc . is the general partner and holds 99% ( 99 % ) of the limited partner interests . host inc . 2019s sole significant asset is its investment in host l.p . and substantially all of host inc . 2019s assets and liabilities represent assets and liabilities of host l.p . all of host inc . 2019s debt is an obligation of host l.p . and may be settled only with assets of host l.p . the consolidated partnership that owns the houston airport marriott at george bush intercontinental , of which we are the general partner and hold 85% ( 85 % ) of the partnership interests , also is a vie . the total assets of this vie at december 31 , 2018 are $ 48 million and consist primarily of cash and .
Question: what percentage of hotel properties are not in the united states?
Answer: | 0.05376 |
FINQA2873 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2007 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2008|$ 1817|
|2009|1241|
|2010|78828|
|2011|13714|
|2012|1894998|
|thereafter|2292895|
|total cash obligations|$ 4283493|
|accreted value of the discount and premium of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes|1791|
|balance as of december 31 2007|$ 4285284|
4 . acquisitions during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , the company used cash to acquire a total of ( i ) 293 towers and the assets of a structural analysis firm for approximately $ 44.0 million in cash ( ii ) 84 towers and 6 in-building distributed antenna systems for approximately $ 14.3 million and ( iii ) 30 towers for approximately $ 6.0 million in cash , respectively . the tower asset acquisitions were primarily in mexico and brazil under ongoing agreements . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company also completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . pursuant to which the company acquired approximately 7800 towers and 100 in-building distributed antenna systems . under the terms of the merger agreement , in august 2005 , spectrasite , inc . merged with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the company , and each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock converted into the right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s class a common stock . the company issued approximately 169.5 million shares of its class a common stock and reserved for issuance approximately 9.9 million and 6.8 million of class a common stock pursuant to spectrasite , inc . options and warrants , respectively , assumed in the merger . the final allocation of the $ 3.1 billion purchase price is summarized in the company 2019s annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . the acquisitions consummated by the company during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with sfas no . 141 201cbusiness combinations 201d ( sfas no . 141 ) . the purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company primarily acquired its tower assets from third parties in one of two types of transactions : the purchase of a business or the purchase of assets . the structure of each transaction affects the way the company allocates purchase price within the consolidated financial statements . in the case of tower assets acquired through the purchase of a business , such as the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , the company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition . the excess of the purchase price paid by the company over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill . in the case of an asset purchase , the company first allocates the purchase price to property and equipment for the appraised value of the towers and to identifiable intangible assets ( primarily acquired customer base ) . the company then records any remaining purchase price within intangible assets as a 201cnetwork location intangible . 201d .
Question: based solely on cash for towers acquisitions , what was the average cost per tower acquired in 2005-2007?
Answer: | 200000.0 |
FINQA2874 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 47760|
|2010|48569|
|2011|49437|
|2012|49959|
|2013|50546|
|years thereafter|103890|
|total|350161|
|less : amount representing interest|54857|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 295304|
.
Question: what portion of the total lease payments is due in the next 12 months?
Answer: | 0.13639 |
FINQA2875 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|balance as of january 1|$ 24412|$ 22505|$ 28520|
|current year increases|8028|17008|16219|
|write-offs net of recoveries and other|-12034 ( 12034 )|-15101 ( 15101 )|-22234 ( 22234 )|
|balance as of december 31|$ 20406|$ 24412|$ 22505|
functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: for 2012 , what was the current allowance as a percent of the beginning balance?
Answer: | 0.32885 |
FINQA2876 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 1 ) adjusted other income ( expense ) excludes pension settlement charges of $ 37 million , $ 128 million , and $ 220 million , for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . ( 2 ) adjusted items are generally taxed at the estimated annual effective tax rate , except for the applicable tax impact associated with estimated restructuring plan expenses , legacy litigation , accelerated tradename amortization , impairment charges and non-cash pension settlement charges , which are adjusted at the related jurisdictional rates . in addition , tax expense excludes the tax impacts from the sale of certain assets and liabilities previously classified as held for sale as well as the tax adjustments recorded to finalize the 2017 accounting for the enactment date impact of the tax reform act recorded pursuant torr sab 118 . ( 3 ) adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes the gain on sale of discontinued operations of $ 82 million , $ 779 million , and $ 0 million for the years ended 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . adjusted net income from discontinued operations excludes intangible asset amortization of $ 0 million , $ 11rr million , and $ 120 million for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the effective tax rate was further adjusted for the applicable tax impact associated with the gain on sale and intangible asset amortization , as applicable . free cash flow we use free cash flow , defined as cash flow provided by operations minus capital expenditures , as a non-gaap measure of our core operating performance and cash generating capabilities of our business operations . this supplemental information related to free cash flow represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our financial statements . the use of this non-gaap measure does not imply or represent the residual cash flow for discretionary expenditures . a reconciliation of this non-gaap measure to cash flow provided by operations is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|cash provided by continuing operating activities|$ 1686|$ 669|$ 1829|
|capital expenditures used for continuing operations|-240 ( 240 )|-183 ( 183 )|-156 ( 156 )|
|free cash flow provided by continuing operations|$ 1446|$ 486|$ 1673|
impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations we conduct business in more than 120 countries and sovereignties and , because of this , foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations have a significant impact on our business . foreign currency exchange rate movements may be significant and may distort true period-to-period comparisons of changes in revenue or pretax income . therefore , to give financial statement users meaningful information about our operations , we have provided an illustration of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on our financial results . the methodology used to calculate this impact isolates the impact of the change in currencies between periods by translating the prior year 2019s revenue , expenses , and net income using the current year 2019s foreign currency exchange rates . translating prior year results at current year foreign currency exchange rates , currency fluctuations had a $ 0.08 favorable impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2018 . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.12 favorable impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , when 2016 results were translated at 2017 rates . currency fluctuations had no impact on net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , when 2015 results were translated at 2016 rates . translating prior year results at current year foreign currency exchange rates , currency fluctuations had a $ 0.09 favorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2018 . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.08 favorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , when 2016 results were translated at 2017 rates . currency fluctuations had a $ 0.04 unfavorable impact on adjusted net income per diluted share during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , when 2015 results were translated at 2016 rates . these translations are performed for comparative purposes only and do not impact the accounting policies or practices for amounts included in the financial statements . competition and markets authority the u.k . 2019s competition regulator , the competition and markets authority ( the 201ccma 201d ) , conducted a market investigation into the supply and acquisition of investment consulting and fiduciary management services , including those offered by aon and its competitors in the u.k. , to assess whether any feature or combination of features in the target market prevents , restricts , or distorts competition . the cma issued a final report on december 12 , 2018 . the cma will draft a series of orders that will set out the detailed remedies , expected in first quarter of 2019 , when they will be subject to further public consultation . we do not anticipate the remedies to have a significant impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial position or business . financial conduct authority the fca is conducting a market study to assess how effectively competition is working in the wholesale insurance broker sector in the u.k . in which aon , through its subsidiaries , participates . the fca has indicated that the purpose of a market study is to assess the extent to which the market is working well in the interests of customers and to identify features of the market that may impact competition . depending on the study 2019s findings , the fca may require remedies in order to correct any features found .
Question: what is the decrease observed in the adjusted net income from discontinued operations during 2017 and 2018 , in millions?
Answer: | 697.0 |
FINQA2877 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: scheduled maturities of our marketable securities are as follows: .
|in millions|available for sale cost|available for sale fair value|
|under 1 year ( current )|$ 25.4|$ 25.4|
|equity securities|0.3|3.5|
|total|$ 25.7|$ 28.9|
as of may 27 , 2018 , we did not any have cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral for derivative contracts . as of may 27 , 2018 , $ 0.9 million of certain accounts receivable were pledged as collateral against a foreign uncommitted line of credit . the fair value and carrying amounts of long-term debt , including the current portion , were $ 14169.7 million and $ 14268.8 million , respectively , as of may 27 , 2018 . the fair value of long-term debt was estimated using market quotations and discounted cash flows based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments . long-term debt is a level 2 liability in the fair value hierarchy . risk management activities as a part of our ongoing operations , we are exposed to market risks such as changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates and commodity and equity prices . to manage these risks , we may enter into various derivative transactions ( e.g. , futures , options , and swaps ) pursuant to our established policies . commodity price risk many commodities we use in the production and distribution of our products are exposed to market price risks . we utilize derivatives to manage price risk for our principal ingredients and energy costs , including grains ( oats , wheat , and corn ) , oils ( principally soybean ) , dairy products , natural gas , and diesel fuel . our primary objective when entering into these derivative contracts is to achieve certainty with regard to the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . we manage our exposures through a combination of purchase orders , long-term contracts with suppliers , exchange-traded futures and options , and over-the-counter options and swaps . we offset our exposures based on current and projected market conditions and generally seek to acquire the inputs at as close to our planned cost as possible . we use derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in commodity prices . we do not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions . accordingly , the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of earnings . although we do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting , we believe that these instruments are effective in achieving our objective of providing certainty in the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . accordingly , for purposes of measuring segment operating performance these gains and losses are reported in unallocated corporate items outside of segment operating results until such time that the exposure we are managing affects earnings . at that time we reclassify the gain or loss from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit , allowing our operating segments to realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility , which remains in unallocated corporate items. .
Question: what is the difference between carrying amounts of long-term debt and fair value?
Answer: | 99.1 |
FINQA2878 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 included $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2458 million , net of $ 915 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
|millions|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2013|$ 525|$ 282|
|2014|466|265|
|2015|410|253|
|2016|375|232|
|2017|339|243|
|later years|2126|1166|
|total minimum leasepayments|$ 4241|$ 2441|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-593 ( 593 )|
|present value of minimum leasepayments|n/a|$ 1848|
approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 631 million in 2012 , $ 637 million in 2011 , and $ 624 million in 2010 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 17 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages .
Question: what is the total capital lease payments due for locomotives , in millions?
Answer: | 2294.54 |
FINQA2879 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .
|2018|$ 9127|
|2019|8336|
|2020|8350|
|2021|7741|
|2022|7577|
|thereafter|9873|
|total minimum future lease payments|$ 51004|
rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building . at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .
Question: what portion of the future future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases is due in the next 12 months?
Answer: | 0.17895 |
FINQA2880 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) foreign currency translation we translate assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries , whose functional currency is their local currency , at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date . we translate revenue and expenses at the monthly average exchange rates . we include accumulated net translation adjustments in stockholders 2019 equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . property and equipment we record property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization . property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 5 years for computers and equipment , 1 to 6 years for furniture and fixtures and up to 35 years for buildings . leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining respective lease term or useful lives . goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and determined that there was no impairment . goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years as shown in the table below . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted average useful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|7|
|localization|1|
|trademarks|7|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|other intangibles|2|
software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . revenue recognition our revenue is derived from the licensing of software products , consulting , hosting services and maintenance and support . primarily , we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , we have delivered the product or performed the service , the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. .
Question: what is the yearly amortization rate related to the purchased technology?
Answer: | 14.28571 |
FINQA2881 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|1424356|$ 33.90|4281952|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )|2014|2014|2014|
|total|1424356|$ 33.90|4281952|
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: in the "2011 plan" what was the ratio of the stock option stock option stock to the stock rights
Answer: | 9.84291 |
FINQA2882 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: financial data supplement ( unaudited ) 2014 ( continued ) .
|country|at december 31 2011 banks|at december 31 2011 governments|at december 31 2011 other|at december 31 2011 total|
|united kingdom|$ 13852|$ 2|$ 89585|$ 103439|
|cayman islands|766|2014|31169|31935|
|france|23561|1096|4196|28853|
|japan|23542|436|2821|26799|
|germany|18674|3485|1859|24018|
|netherlands|3508|23|8826|12357|
|luxembourg|1619|94|6137|7850|
|brazil|149|3398|2165|5712|
|australia|2008|557|1414|3979|
|italy|881|1463|539|2883|
.
Question: how big is south america compared to asia?
Answer: | 0.21314 |
FINQA2883 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to the consolidated financial statements december 28 , 2013 , december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 ( in thousands , except per share data ) in july 2012 , the fasb issued asu no . 2012-02 201cintangible-goodwill and other 2013 testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment . 201d asu 2012-02 modifies the requirement to test intangible assets that are not subject to amortization based on events or changes in circumstances that might indicate that the asset is impaired now requiring the test only if it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired . furthermore , asu 2012-02 provides entities the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than the carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test . asu 2012-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after september 15 , 2012 and early adoption is permitted . the adoption of asu 2012-02 had no impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . inventories , net : merchandise inventory the company used the lifo method of accounting for approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of inventories at both december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 . under lifo , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most recently purchased inventories , while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs for inventories purchased in fiscal 2013 and prior years . the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 5572 and $ 24087 in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s overall costs to acquire inventory for the same or similar products have generally decreased historically as the company has been able to leverage its continued growth , execution of merchandise strategies and realization of supply chain efficiencies . in fiscal 2011 , the company recorded an increase to cost of sales of $ 24708 due to an increase in supply chain costs and inflationary pressures affecting certain product categories . product cores the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries , which are valued under the first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) method . product cores are included as part of the company 2019s merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . because product cores are not subject to frequent cost changes like the company 2019s other merchandise inventory , there is no material difference when applying either the lifo or fifo valuation method . inventory overhead costs purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , were $ 161519 and $ 134258 , respectively . inventory balance and inventory reserves inventory balances at the end of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were as follows : december 28 , december 29 .
||december 282013|december 292012|
|inventories at fifo net|$ 2424795|$ 2182419|
|adjustments to state inventories at lifo|131762|126190|
|inventories at lifo net|$ 2556557|$ 2308609|
inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company completes physical inventories and other targeted inventory counts in its store locations to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory in these locations . in its distribution centers and pdq aes , the company uses a cycle counting program to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and product core inventory . reserves for estimated shrink are established based on the results of physical inventories conducted by the company with the assistance of an independent third party in substantially all of the company 2019s stores over the course of the year , other targeted inventory counts in its stores , results from recent cycle counts in its distribution facilities and historical and current loss trends. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in inventories balance due to the adoption of lifo in 2012?
Answer: | 0.05782 |
FINQA2884 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .
|cash flow data|years ended december 31 , 2014|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|
|net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1|$ 831.2|$ 598.4|$ 697.2|
|net cash used in working capital b2|-131.1 ( 131.1 )|-9.6 ( 9.6 )|-293.2 ( 293.2 )|
|changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash|-30.6 ( 30.6 )|4.1|-46.8 ( 46.8 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 669.5|$ 592.9|$ 357.2|
|net cash used in investing activities|-200.8 ( 200.8 )|-224.5 ( 224.5 )|-210.2 ( 210.2 )|
|net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities|-343.9 ( 343.9 )|-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )|131.3|
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what is the growth rate for net cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: | 0.1292 |
FINQA2885 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .
||12/31/2011|12/29/2012|12/28/2013|1/3/2015|1/2/2016|12/31/2016|
|cadence design systems inc .|100.00|129.23|133.94|181.06|200.10|242.50|
|nasdaq composite|100.00|116.41|165.47|188.69|200.32|216.54|
|s&p 400 information technology|100.00|118.41|165.38|170.50|178.74|219.65|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .
Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock for the period ended 12/31/2016?
Answer: | 1.425 |
FINQA2886 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2008 2007 2008 2007 .
|( millions ) performance coatings|net sales 2008 $ 4716|2007 $ 3811|segment income 2008 $ 582|2007 $ 563|
|industrial coatings|3999|3646|212|370|
|architectural coatings 2013 emea|2249|2014|141|2014|
|optical and specialty materials|1134|1029|244|235|
|commodity chemicals|1837|1539|340|243|
|glass|1914|2195|70|138|
performance coatings sales increased $ 905 million or 24% ( 24 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 21% ( 21 % ) due to acquisitions , largely due to the impact of the sigmakalon protective and marine coatings business . sales also grew by 3% ( 3 % ) due to higher selling prices and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation . sales volumes declined 2% ( 2 % ) as reduced volumes in architectural coatings 2013 americas and asia pacific and automotive refinish were not fully offset by improved volumes in the aerospace and protective and marine businesses . volume growth in the aerospace businesses occurred throughout the world , while the volume growth in protective and marine coatings occurred primarily in asia . segment income increased $ 19 million in 2008 . factors increasing segment income were the positive impact of acquisitions , lower overhead costs and the positive impact of foreign currency translation . the benefit of higher selling prices more than offset the negative impact of inflation , including higher raw materials and benefit costs . segment income was reduced by the impact of the lower sales volumes in architectural coatings and automotive refinish , which more than offset the benefit of volume gains in the aerospace and protective and marine coatings businesses . industrial coatings sales increased $ 353 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 11% ( 11 % ) due to acquisitions , including the impact of the sigmakalon industrial coatings business . sales also grew 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation , and 1% ( 1 % ) from higher selling prices . sales volumes declined 5% ( 5 % ) as reduced volumes were experienced in all three businesses , reflecting the substantial declines in global demand . volume declines in the automotive and industrial businesses were primarily in the u.s . and canada . additional volume declines in the european and asian regions were experienced by the industrial coatings business . in packaging coatings , volume declines in europe were only partially offset by gains in asia and north america . segment income declined $ 158 million in 2008 due to the lower volumes and inflation , including higher raw material and freight costs , the impact of which was only partially mitigated by the increased selling prices . segment income also declined due to higher selling and distribution costs , including higher bad debt expense . factors increasing segment income were the earnings of acquired businesses , the positive impact of foreign currency translation and lower manufacturing costs . architectural coatings - emea sales for the year were $ 2249 million . this business was acquired in the sigmakalon acquisition . segment income was $ 141 million , which included amortization expense of $ 63 million related to acquired intangible assets and depreciation expense of $ 58 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 105 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 5% ( 5 % ) due to higher volumes in our optical products business resulting from the launch of transitions optical 2019s next generation lens product , 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation and 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased selling prices . segment income increased $ 9 million in 2008 . the increase in segment income was the result of increased sales volumes and the favorable impact of currency partially offset by increased selling and marketing costs in the optical products business related to the transitions optical product launch mentioned above . increased selling prices only partially offset higher raw material costs , primarily in our silicas business . commodity chemicals sales increased $ 298 million or 19% ( 19 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 18% ( 18 % ) due to higher selling prices and 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved sales volumes . segment income increased $ 97 million in 2008 . segment income increased in large part due to higher selling prices , which more than offset the negative impact of inflation , primarily higher raw material and energy costs . segment income also improved due to lower manufacturing costs , while lower margin mix and equity earnings reduced segment income . glass sales decreased $ 281 million or 13% ( 13 % ) in 2008 . sales decreased 11% ( 11 % ) due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business in september 2008 and 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower sales volumes . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 68 million in 2008 . segment income decreased due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business , lower volumes , the negative impact of inflation and lower equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures . factors increasing segment income were lower manufacturing costs , higher selling prices and stronger foreign currency . outlook overall global economic activity was volatile in 2008 with an overall downward trend . the north american economy continued a slowing trend which began during the second half of 2006 and continued all of 2007 . the impact of the weakening u.s . economy was particularly 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 17 .
Question: what was the revenue impact of higher selling prices in the glass segment in 2008?
Answer: | 43900000.0 |
FINQA2887 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2006 and 2005. .
|2006|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 32.68|$ 26.66|
|quarter ended june 30|35.75|27.35|
|quarter ended september 30|36.92|29.98|
|quarter ended december 31|38.74|35.21|
|2005|high|low|
|quarter ended march 31|$ 19.28|$ 17.30|
|quarter ended june 30|21.16|16.28|
|quarter ended september 30|25.20|20.70|
|quarter ended december 31|28.33|22.73|
on february 22 , 2007 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 40.38 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 22 , 2007 , we had 419988395 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 623 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . in august 2005 , we amended and restated our charter to , among other things , eliminate our class b common stock and class c common stock . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our credit facilities and the indentures governing the terms of our debt securities contain covenants that may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests . under our credit facilities , the borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the applicable credit facility only if no default exists or would be created thereby . the indenture governing the terms of the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes also contain certain restrictive covenants , which prohibit the restricted subsidiaries under these indentures from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under our credit facilities and our notes indentures , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 22 , 2007?
Answer: | 674138.67576 |
FINQA2888 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: containerboard , kraft papers and saturating kraft . kapstone also owns victory packaging , a packaging solutions distribution company with facilities in the u.s. , canada and mexico . we have included the financial results of kapstone in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . on september 4 , 2018 , we completed the acquisition ( the 201cschl fcter acquisition 201d ) of schl fcter print pharma packaging ( 201cschl fcter 201d ) . schl fcter is a leading provider of differentiated paper and packaging solutions and a german-based supplier of a full range of leaflets and booklets . the schl fcter acquisition allowed us to further enhance our pharmaceutical and automotive platform and expand our geographical footprint in europe to better serve our customers . we have included the financial results of the acquired operations in our consumer packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . on january 5 , 2018 , we completed the acquisition ( the 201cplymouth packaging acquisition 201d ) of substantially all of the assets of plymouth packaging , inc . ( 201cplymouth 201d ) . the assets we acquired included plymouth 2019s 201cbox on demand 201d systems , which are manufactured by panotec , an italian manufacturer of packaging machines . the addition of the box on demand systems enhanced our platform , differentiation and innovation . these systems , which are located on customers 2019 sites under multi-year exclusive agreements , use fanfold corrugated to produce custom , on-demand corrugated packaging that is accurately sized for any product type according to the customer 2019s specifications . fanfold corrugated is continuous corrugated board , folded periodically to form an accordion-like stack of corrugated material . as part of the transaction , westrock acquired plymouth 2019s equity interest in panotec and plymouth 2019s exclusive right from panotec to distribute panotec 2019s equipment in the u.s . and canada . we have fully integrated the approximately 60000 tons of containerboard used by plymouth annually . we have included the financial results of plymouth in our corrugated packaging segment since the date of the acquisition . see 201cnote 3 . acquisitions and investment 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . see also item 1a . 201crisk factors 2014 we may be unsuccessful in making and integrating mergers , acquisitions and investments , and completing divestitures 201d . business .
|( in millions )|year ended september 30 , 2019|year ended september 30 , 2018|
|net sales|$ 18289.0|$ 16285.1|
|segment income|$ 1790.2|$ 1707.6|
in fiscal 2019 , we continued to pursue our strategy of offering differentiated paper and packaging solutions that help our customers win . we successfully executed this strategy in fiscal 2019 in a rapidly changing cost and price environment . net sales of $ 18289.0 million for fiscal 2019 increased $ 2003.9 million , or 12.3% ( 12.3 % ) , compared to fiscal 2018 . the increase was primarily due to the kapstone acquisition and higher selling price/mix in our corrugated packaging and consumer packaging segments . these increases were partially offset by the absence of recycling net sales in fiscal 2019 as a result of conducting the operations primarily as a procurement function beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 , lower volumes , unfavorable foreign currency impacts across our segments compared to the prior year and decreased land and development net sales . segment income increased $ 82.6 million in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 , primarily due to increased corrugated packaging segment income that was partially offset by lower consumer packaging and land and development segment income . the impact of the contribution from the acquired kapstone operations , higher selling price/mix across our segments and productivity improvements was largely offset by lower volumes across our segments , economic downtime , cost inflation , increased maintenance and scheduled strategic outage expense ( including projects at our mahrt , al and covington , va mills ) and lower land and development segment income due to the wind-down of sales . with respect to segment income , we experienced higher levels of cost inflation in both our corrugated packaging and consumer packaging segments during fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018 that were partially offset by recovered fiber deflation . the primary inflationary items were virgin fiber , freight , energy and wage and other costs . we generated $ 2310.2 million of net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2019 , compared to $ 1931.2 million in fiscal 2018 . we remained committed to our disciplined capital allocation strategy during fiscal .
Question: in 2019 , what percent of sales does segment income amount to?
Answer: | 0.09788 |
FINQA2889 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: of exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: .
|( $ in millions except per share amounts )|year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr|year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )|year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr|year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )|
|sales and service revenues|$ 1570|$ 1745|$ 1800|$ 1905|
|operating income ( loss )|156|269|200|144|
|earnings ( loss ) before income taxes|133|244|175|80|
|net earnings ( loss )|87|156|111|50|
|dividends declared per share|$ 0.40|$ 0.40|$ 0.40|$ 0.50|
|basic earnings ( loss ) per share|$ 1.80|$ 3.22|$ 2.31|$ 1.07|
|diluted earnings ( loss ) per share|$ 1.79|$ 3.20|$ 2.29|$ 1.06|
( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. .
Question: what is the total net income for the fiscal year of 2015?
Answer: | 404.0 |
FINQA2890 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: welltower inc . notes to consolidated financial statements is no longer present ( and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth ) . the valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented ( in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2017 2016 2015 .
|2016|year ended december 31 2017 2016|year ended december 31 2017 2016|year ended december 31 2017|
|beginning balance|$ 96838|$ 98966|$ 85207|
|expense ( benefit )|30445|-2128 ( 2128 )|13759|
|ending balance|$ 127283|$ 96838|$ 98966|
as a result of certain acquisitions , we are subject to corporate level taxes for any related asset dispositions that may occur during the five-year period immediately after such assets were owned by a c corporation ( 201cbuilt-in gains tax 201d ) . the amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to the lesser of ( a ) the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a reit asset , or ( b ) the actual amount of gain . some but not all gains recognized during this period of time could be offset by available net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we acquired certain additional assets with built-in gains as of the date of acquisition that could be subject to the built-in gains tax if disposed of prior to the expiration of the applicable ten-year period . we have not recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of the potential built-in gains tax based on our intentions with respect to such properties and available tax planning strategies . under the provisions of the reit investment diversification and empowerment act of 2007 ( 201cridea 201d ) , for taxable years beginning after july 30 , 2008 , the reit may lease 201cqualified health care properties 201d on an arm 2019s-length basis to a trs if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an 201celigible independent contractor . 201d generally , the rent received from the trs will meet the related party rent exception and will be treated as 201crents from real property . 201d a 201cqualified health care property 201d includes real property and any personal property that is , or is necessary or incidental to the use of , a hospital , nursing facility , assisted living facility , congregate care facility , qualified continuing care facility , or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients . we have entered into various joint ventures that were structured under ridea . resident level rents and related operating expenses for these facilities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and are subject to federal , state and foreign income taxes as the operations of such facilities are included in a trs . certain net operating loss carryforwards could be utilized to offset taxable income in future years . given the applicable statute of limitations , we generally are subject to audit by the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and subsequent years . the statute of limitations may vary in the states in which we own properties or conduct business . we do not expect to be subject to audit by state taxing authorities for any year prior to the year ended december 31 , 2011 . we are also subject to audit by the canada revenue agency and provincial authorities generally for periods subsequent to may 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions , and by the u.k . 2019s hm revenue & customs for periods subsequent to august 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions . at december 31 , 2017 , we had a net operating loss ( 201cnol 201d ) carryforward related to the reit of $ 448475000 . due to our uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets , we have not recorded a deferred tax asset related to nols generated by the reit . these amounts can be used to offset future taxable income ( and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed ) , if any . the reit will be entitled to utilize nols and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that reit taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid . the nol carryforwards generated through december 31 , 2017 will expire through 2036 . beginning with tax years after december 31 , 2017 , the tax cuts and jobs act ( 201ctax act 201d ) eliminates the carryback period , limits the nols to 80% ( 80 % ) of taxable income and replaces the 20-year carryforward period with an indefinite carryforward period. .
Question: for the year ended december 31 2017 , beginning balance is what percent of the ending balance?
Answer: | 0.76081 |
FINQA2891 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 31mar201122064257 notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 . income taxes ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|balance at october 2 2009|$ 8859|
|increases based on positions related to prior years|437|
|increases based on positions related to current year|11221|
|decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities|2014|
|decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations|-617 ( 617 )|
|balance at october 1 2010|$ 19900|
the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of october 1 , 2010 are the united states , california , and iowa . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . during the year ended october 1 , 2010 , $ 0.6 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations period were recognized . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company did not incur any significant accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2010 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock the company is authorized to issue ( 1 ) 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share , and ( 2 ) 25000000 shares of preferred stock , without par value . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or on august 3 , 2010 , the company 2019s board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . the company had not repurchased any shares under the program for the fiscal year ended october 1 , 2010 . as of november 29 , 2010 , the skyworks / 2010 annual report 137 .
Question: what is the net chance in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: | 11041.0 |
FINQA2892 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) .
|( in thousands )|amount|weighted average useful life ( years )|
|customer contracts and relationships|$ 576900|11|
|purchased technology|444500|7|
|backlog|105800|2|
|non-competition agreements|12100|2|
|trademarks|328500|9|
|total identifiable intangible assets|1467800||
|net liabilities assumed|-191288 ( 191288 )|n/a|
|goodwill ( 1 )|3459751|n/a|
|total estimated purchase price|$ 4736263||
_________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: goodwill is what percent of total estimated purchase price?
Answer: | 0.73048 |
FINQA2893 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: brokerage and asset management brokerage and asset management ( bam ) , which constituted approximately 6% ( 6 % ) of citi holdings by assets as of december 31 , 2009 , consists of citi 2019s global retail brokerage and asset management businesses . this segment was substantially affected and reduced in size in 2009 due to the divestitures of smith barney ( to the morgan stanley smith barney joint venture ( mssb jv ) ) and nikko cordial securities . at december 31 , 2009 , bam had approximately $ 35 billion of assets , which included $ 26 billion of assets from the 49% ( 49 % ) interest in the mssb jv ( $ 13 billion investment and $ 13 billion in loans associated with the clients of the mssb jv ) and $ 9 billion of assets from a diverse set of asset management and insurance businesses of which approximately half will be transferred into the latam rcb during the first quarter of 2010 , as discussed under 201cciti holdings 201d above . morgan stanley has options to purchase citi 2019s remaining stake in the mssb jv over three years starting in 2012 . the 2009 results include an $ 11.1 billion gain ( $ 6.7 billion after-tax ) on the sale of smith barney . in millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007 .
|in millions of dollars|2009|2008|2007|% ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008|% ( % ) change 2008 vs . 2007|
|net interest revenue|$ 432|$ 1224|$ 908|( 65 ) % ( % )|35% ( 35 % )|
|non-interest revenue|14703|7199|9751|nm|-26 ( 26 )|
|total revenues net of interest expense|$ 15135|$ 8423|$ 10659|80% ( 80 % )|( 21 ) % ( % )|
|total operating expenses|$ 3350|$ 9236|$ 7960|( 64 ) % ( % )|16% ( 16 % )|
|net credit losses|$ 3|$ 10|$ 2014|( 70 ) % ( % )|2014|
|credit reserve build/ ( release )|36|8|4|nm|100% ( 100 % )|
|provision for unfunded lending commitments|-5 ( 5 )|2014|2014|2014|2014|
|provision for benefits and claims|$ 155|$ 205|$ 154|( 24 ) % ( % )|33% ( 33 % )|
|provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims|$ 189|$ 223|$ 158|( 15 ) % ( % )|41% ( 41 % )|
|income ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes|$ 11596|$ -1036 ( 1036 )|$ 2541|nm|nm|
|income taxes ( benefits )|4489|-272 ( 272 )|834|nm|nm|
|income ( loss ) from continuing operations|$ 7107|$ -764 ( 764 )|$ 1707|nm|nm|
|net income ( loss ) attributable to noncontrolling interests|12|-179 ( 179 )|35|nm|nm|
|net income ( loss )|$ 7095|$ -585 ( 585 )|$ 1672|nm|nm|
|eop assets ( in billions of dollars )|$ 35|$ 58|$ 56|( 40 ) % ( % )|4% ( 4 % )|
|eop deposits ( in billions of dollars )|60|58|46|3|26|
nm not meaningful 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense increased 80% ( 80 % ) versus the prior year mainly driven by the $ 11.1 billion pretax gain on the sale ( $ 6.7 billion after-tax ) on the mssb jv transaction in the second quarter of 2009 and a $ 320 million pretax gain on the sale of the managed futures business to the mssb jv in the third quarter of 2009 . excluding these gains , revenue decreased primarily due to the absence of smith barney from may 2009 onwards and the absence of fourth-quarter revenue of nikko asset management , partially offset by an improvement in marks in retail alternative investments . revenues in the prior year include a $ 347 million pretax gain on sale of citistreet and charges related to the settlement of auction rate securities of $ 393 million pretax . operating expenses decreased 64% ( 64 % ) from the prior year , mainly driven by the absence of smith barney and nikko asset management expenses , re- engineering efforts and the absence of 2008 one-time expenses ( $ 0.9 billion intangible impairment , $ 0.2 billion of restructuring and $ 0.5 billion of write- downs and other charges ) . provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 15% ( 15 % ) mainly reflecting a $ 50 million decrease in provision for benefits and claims , partially offset by increased reserve builds of $ 28 million . assets decreased 40% ( 40 % ) versus the prior year , mostly driven by the sales of nikko cordial securities and nikko asset management ( $ 25 billion ) and the managed futures business ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partially offset by increased smith barney assets of $ 4 billion . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 21% ( 21 % ) from the prior year primarily due to lower transactional and investment revenues in smith barney , lower revenues in nikko asset management and higher markdowns in retail alternative investments . operating expenses increased 16% ( 16 % ) versus the prior year , mainly driven by a $ 0.9 billion intangible impairment in nikko asset management in the fourth quarter of 2008 , $ 0.2 billion of restructuring charges and $ 0.5 billion of write-downs and other charges . provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $ 65 million compared to the prior year , mainly due to a $ 52 million increase in provisions for benefits and claims . assets increased 4% ( 4 % ) versus the prior year. .
Question: as a percent of total revenues net of interest expense what was non-interest revenue in 2007?
Answer: | 0.91481 |
FINQA2894 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operations may be extended up to four additional years for each unit by mutual agreement of entergy and new york state based on an exigent reliability need for indian point generation . in accordance with the ferc-approved tariff of the new york independent system operator ( nyiso ) , entergy submitted to the nyiso a notice of generator deactivation based on the dates in the settlement ( no later than april 30 , 2020 for indian point unit 2 and april 30 , 2021 for indian point unit 3 ) . in december 2017 , nyiso issued a report stating there will not be a system reliability need following the deactivation of indian point . the nyiso also has advised that it will perform an analysis of the potential competitive impacts of the proposed retirement under provisions of its tariff . the deadline for the nyiso to make a withholding determination is in dispute and is pending before the ferc . in addition to contractually agreeing to cease commercial operations early , in february 2017 entergy filed with the nrc an amendment to its license renewal application changing the term of the requested licenses to coincide with the latest possible extension by mutual agreement based on exigent reliability needs : april 30 , 2024 for indian point 2 and april 30 , 2025 for indian point 3 . if entergy reasonably determines that the nrc will treat the amendment other than as a routine amendment , entergy may withdraw the amendment . other provisions of the settlement include termination of all then-existing investigations of indian point by the agencies signing the agreement , which include the new york state department of environmental conservation , the new york state department of state , the new york state department of public service , the new york state department of health , and the new york state attorney general . the settlement recognizes the right of new york state agencies to pursue new investigations and enforcement actions with respect to new circumstances or existing conditions that become materially exacerbated . another provision of the settlement obligates entergy to establish a $ 15 million fund for environmental projects and community support . apportionment and allocation of funds to beneficiaries are to be determined by mutual agreement of new york state and entergy . the settlement recognizes new york state 2019s right to perform an annual inspection of indian point , with scope and timing to be determined by mutual agreement . in may 2017 a plaintiff filed two parallel state court appeals challenging new york state 2019s actions in signing and implementing the indian point settlement with entergy on the basis that the state failed to perform sufficient environmental analysis of its actions . all signatories to the settlement agreement , including the entergy affiliates that hold nrc licenses for indian point , were named . the appeals were voluntarily dismissed in november 2017 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital ratio for entergy as of december 31 , 2017 is primarily due to an increase in commercial paper outstanding in 2017 as compared to 2016. .
||2017|2016|
|debt to capital|67.1% ( 67.1 % )|64.8% ( 64.8 % )|
|effect of excluding securitization bonds|( 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) )|( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) )|
|debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )|66.3% ( 66.3 % )|63.8% ( 63.8 % )|
|effect of subtracting cash|( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )|( 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) )|
|net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )|65.2% ( 65.2 % )|61.8% ( 61.8 % )|
( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , new orleans , and texas securitization bonds , which are non- recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas , respectively. .
Question: what is the percent change in debt to capital from 2016 to 2017
Answer: | 0.03549 |
FINQA2895 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) .
||number of units ( in thousands )|weighted average fair value ( in $ )|
|nonvested at december 31 2008|1188|19.65|
|granted|420|38.16|
|vested|-79 ( 79 )|21.30|
|forfeited|-114 ( 114 )|17.28|
|nonvested at december 31 2009|1415|25.24|
the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the net change number of units in 2009 in thousands
Answer: | 227.0 |
FINQA2896 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: compared with $ 6.2 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were significantly higher than in both 2014 and 2013 . excluding facility closure costs , impairment costs and other special items , operating profits in 2015 were 3% ( 3 % ) lower than in 2014 and 4% ( 4 % ) higher than in 2013 . benefits from lower input costs ( $ 18 million ) , lower costs associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill ( $ 44 million ) and favorable foreign exchange ( $ 33 million ) were offset by lower average sales price realizations and mix ( $ 52 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 16 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 18 million ) and higher planned maintenance downtime costs ( $ 26 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2014 include special items costs of $ 554 million associated with the closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . in the first quarter of 2014 , we completed our evaluation and concluded that there were no alternative uses for these assets . we recognized approximately $ 464 million of accelerated depreciation related to these assets in 2014 . operating profits in 2014 also include a charge of $ 32 million associated with a foreign tax amnesty program , and a gain of $ 20 million for the resolution of a legal contingency in india , while operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill and a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . printing papers .
|in millions|2015|2014|2013|
|sales|$ 5031|$ 5720|$ 6205|
|operating profit ( loss )|533|-16 ( 16 )|271|
north american printing papers net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 , $ 2.1 billion in 2014 and $ 2.6 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 179 million compared with a loss of $ 398 million ( a gain of $ 156 million excluding costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill ) in 2014 and a gain of $ 36 million ( $ 154 million excluding costs associated with the courtland mill shutdown ) in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 decreased compared with 2014 primarily due to the closure of our courtland mill in 2014 . shipments to the domestic market increased , but export shipments declined . average sales price realizations decreased , primarily in the domestic market . input costs were lower , mainly for energy . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 12 million higher in 2015 . operating profits in 2014 were negatively impacted by costs associated with the shutdown of our courtland , alabama mill . entering the first quarter of 2016 , sales volumes are expected to be up slightly compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 . average sales margins should be about flat reflecting lower average sales price realizations offset by a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be stable . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 14 million lower with an outage scheduled in the 2016 first quarter at our georgetown mill compared with outages at our eastover and riverdale mills in the 2015 fourth quarter . in january 2015 , the united steelworkers , domtar corporation , packaging corporation of america , finch paper llc and p . h . glatfelter company ( the petitioners ) filed an anti-dumping petition before the united states international trade commission ( itc ) and the united states department of commerce ( doc ) alleging that paper producers in china , indonesia , australia , brazil , and portugal are selling uncoated free sheet paper in sheet form ( the products ) in violation of international trade rules . the petitioners also filed a countervailing-duties petition with these agencies regarding imports of the products from china and indonesia . in january 2016 , the doc announced its final countervailing duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from china and indonesia . also , in january 2016 , the doc announced its final anti-dumping duty rates on imports of the products to the united states from certain producers from australia , brazil , china , indonesia and portugal . in february 2016 , the itc concluded its anti- dumping and countervailing duties investigations and made a final determination that the u.s . market had been injured by imports of the products . accordingly , the doc 2019s previously announced countervailing duty rates and anti-dumping duty rates will be in effect for a minimum of five years . we do not believe the impact of these rates will have a material , adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements . brazilian papers net sales for 2015 were $ 878 million compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits for 2015 were $ 186 million compared with $ 177 million ( $ 209 million excluding costs associated with a tax amnesty program ) in 2014 and $ 210 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 were lower compared with 2014 reflecting weak economic conditions and the absence of 2014 one-time events . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper due to the realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2015 . margins were unfavorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the lower-margin export markets . raw material costs increased for energy and wood . operating costs were higher than in 2014 , while planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 4 million lower. .
Question: what percentage of printing paper sales where north american printing papers net sales 2015?
Answer: | 0.37766 |
FINQA2897 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .
||issued|in treasury|shares outstanding|
|balance january 1 2007|1334|-156 ( 156 )|1178|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|14|14|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|2|2|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-16 ( 16 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|issued on conversions of debentures|2013|18|18|
|balance december 31 2007|1334|-138 ( 138 )|1196|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|5|5|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|2|2|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-21 ( 21 )|-21 ( 21 )|
|issued on conversions of debentures|2013|12|12|
|balance december 31 2008|1334|-140 ( 140 )|1194|
|shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged|2013|4|4|
|vesting of restricted stock|2013|1|1|
|shares issued under employee stock purchase plan|2013|4|4|
|stock repurchase program|2013|-8 ( 8 )|-8 ( 8 )|
|balance december 31 2009|1334|-139 ( 139 )|1195|
see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: how many shares were repurchased in this period?
Answer: | 45000000.0 |
FINQA2898 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: domestic utility companies and system energy notes to respective financial statements protested the disallowance of these deductions to the office of irs appeals . entergy expects to receive a notice of deficiency in 2005 for this item , and plans to vigorously contest this matter . entergy believes that the contingency provision established in its financial statements sufficiently covers the risk associated with this item . mark to market of certain power contracts in 2001 , entergy louisiana changed its method of accounting for tax purposes related to its wholesale electric power contracts . the most significant of these is the contract to purchase power from the vidalia hydroelectric project . the new tax accounting method has provided a cumulative cash flow benefit of approximately $ 790 million as of december 31 , 2004 . the related irs interest exposure is $ 93 million at december 31 , 2004 . this benefit is expected to reverse in the years 2005 through 2031 . the election did not reduce book income tax expense . the timing of the reversal of this benefit depends on several variables , including the price of power . due to the temporary nature of the tax benefit , the potential interest charge represents entergy's net earnings exposure . entergy louisiana's 2001 tax return is currently under examination by the irs , though no adjustments have yet been proposed with respect to the mark to market election . entergy believes that the contingency provision established in its financial statements will sufficiently cover the risk associated with this issue . cashpoint bankruptcy ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans ) in 2003 the domestic utility companies entered an agreement with cashpoint network services ( cashpoint ) under which cashpoint was to manage a network of payment agents through which entergy's utility customers could pay their bills . the payment agent system allows customers to pay their bills at various commercial or governmental locations , rather than sending payments by mail . approximately one-third of entergy's utility customers use payment agents . on april 19 , 2004 , cashpoint failed to pay funds due to the domestic utility companies that had been collected through payment agents . the domestic utility companies then obtained a temporary restraining order from the civil district court for the parish of orleans , state of louisiana , enjoining cashpoint from distributing funds belonging to entergy , except by paying those funds to entergy . on april 22 , 2004 , a petition for involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy was filed against cashpoint by other creditors in the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of new york . in response to these events , the domestic utility companies expanded an existing contract with another company to manage all of their payment agents . the domestic utility companies filed proofs of claim in the cashpoint bankruptcy proceeding in september 2004 . although entergy cannot precisely determine at this time the amount that cashpoint owes to the domestic utility companies that may not be repaid , it has accrued an estimate of loss based on current information . if no cash is repaid to the domestic utility companies , an event entergy does not believe is likely , the current estimates of maximum exposure to loss are approximately as follows : amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|entergy arkansas|$ 1.8|
|entergy gulf states|$ 7.7|
|entergy louisiana|$ 8.8|
|entergy mississippi|$ 4.3|
|entergy new orleans|$ 2.4|
environmental issues ( entergy gulf states ) entergy gulf states has been designated as a prp for the cleanup of certain hazardous waste disposal sites . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy gulf states does not expect the remaining clean-up costs to exceed its recorded liability of $ 1.5 million for the remaining sites at which the epa has designated entergy gulf states as a prp. .
Question: what portion of the maximum exposure to loss for entergy if no cash is repaid to domestic utility companies is incurred from entergy louisiana?
Answer: | 0.352 |
FINQA2899 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: while we have remediated the previously-identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting , we may identify other material weaknesses in the future . in november 2017 , we restated our consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 in order to correctly classify cash receipts from the payments on sold receivables ( which are cash receipts on the underlying trade receivables that have already been securitized ) to cash provided by investing activities ( from cash provided by operating activities ) within our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows . in connection with these restatements , management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the misapplication of accounting standards update 2016-15 . specifically , we did not maintain effective controls over the adoption of new accounting standards , including communication with the appropriate individuals in coming to our conclusions on the application of new accounting standards . as a result of this material weakness , our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 . while we have remediated the material weakness and our management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of december 30 , 2017 , there can be no assurance that our controls will remain adequate . the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations , including judgments used in decision-making , the nature and complexity of the transactions we undertake , assumptions about the likelihood of future events , the soundness of our systems , cost limitations , and other limitations . if other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future or we otherwise must restate our financial statements , it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations or financial condition , restrict our ability to access the capital markets , require us to expend significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies , subject us to fines , penalties , investigations or judgments , harm our reputation , or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 30 , 2017 , we operated 83 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 80 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 30 , 2017 was: .
||owned|leased|
|united states|41|1|
|canada|2|2014|
|europe|11|2014|
|rest of world|26|2|
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: what portion of the company owned facilities are located in united states?
Answer: | 0.5125 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.