id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA2300 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .
|total cumulative return|2012|2013|2014|2015|2016|
|edwards lifesciences|$ 127.54|$ 93.01|$ 180.17|$ 223.42|$ 265.06|
|s&p 500|116.00|153.58|174.60|177.01|198.18|
|s&p 500 healthcare equipment index|117.42|150.28|181.96|194.37|207.46|
.
Question: what was the difference in cumulative percentage returns between edwards lifesciences and the s&p 500 for the five years ended 2016?
Answer: | 0.6688 |
FINQA2301 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) .
|year|north america ( 1 )|europe ( 2 )|
|2010|3.1% ( 3.1 % )|1.1% ( 1.1 % )|
|2011|3.4% ( 3.4 % )|1.1% ( 1.1 % )|
|2012|3.3% ( 3.3 % )|1.2% ( 1.2 % )|
|2013|3.4% ( 3.4 % )|1.2% ( 1.2 % )|
|2014|3.5% ( 3.5 % )|1.3% ( 1.3 % )|
( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i .
Question: what is the estimated percentage increase , from 2012 to 2014 , in total global cruise guests?
Answer: | 5.26316 |
FINQA2302 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) .
||2015|2014 ( in millions )|2013|
|share-based compensation expense|$ 21.1|$ 29.8|$ 18.4|
|income tax benefit|$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )|$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )|$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )|
we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015?
Answer: | 19.6 |
FINQA2303 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: .
||2010|2009|2008|
|balance at beginning of year|$ 160|$ 133|$ 86|
|provision|38|54|65|
|amounts written off|-13 ( 13 )|-27 ( 27 )|-18 ( 18 )|
|balance at end of year|$ 185|$ 160|$ 133|
discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses . this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business . this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . part ii , item 8 .
Question: in 2010 , what percentage of allowance for doubtful accounts were written off?
Answer: | 0.08125 |
FINQA2304 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .
||2008|2009|2010|2011|2012|2013|
|state street corporation|$ 100|$ 111|$ 118|$ 105|$ 125|$ 198|
|s&p 500 index|100|126|146|149|172|228|
|s&p financial index|100|117|132|109|141|191|
|kbw bank index|100|98|121|93|122|168|
.
Question: how much higher are the returns of the s&p 500 in the same period ( 2008-2013 ) ? as a percentage .
Answer: | 0.0228 |
FINQA2305 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company is currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ending december 31 , 2007 is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|balance at january 1 2007|$ 183953|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|2598|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|5412|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-120016 ( 120016 )|
|cash advance in connection with proposed settlement|-6682 ( 6682 )|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-5372 ( 5372 )|
|reductions as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations|-669 ( 669 )|
|balance as of december 31 2007|$ 59224|
during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company recorded penalties and tax-related interest income of $ 2.5 million and interest income from tax refunds of $ 1.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total unrecognized tax benefits included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 29.6 million and $ 34.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 30.7 million and $ 33.2 million , respectively . in the fourth quarter of 2007 , the company entered into a tax amnesty program with the mexican tax authority . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had met all of the administrative requirements of the program , which enabled the company to recognize certain tax benefits . this was confirmed by the mexican tax authority on february 5 , 2008 . these benefits include a reduction of uncertain tax benefits of $ 5.4 million along with penalties and interest of $ 12.5 million related to 2002 , all of which reduced income tax expense . in connection with the above program , the company paid $ 6.7 million to the mexican tax authority as a settlement offer for other uncertain tax positions related to 2003 and 2004 . this offer is currently under review by the mexican tax authority ; the company cannot yet determine the specific timing or the amount of any potential settlement . during 2007 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed , which resulted in a $ 0.7 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision . the company files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns , including u.s . federal and state tax returns and foreign tax returns in mexico and brazil . as a result of the company 2019s ability to carry forward federal and state net operating losses , the applicable tax years remain open to examination until three years after the applicable loss carryforwards have been used or expired . however , the company has completed u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years up to and including 2002 . the company is currently undergoing u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years 2004 and 2005 . additionally , it is subject to examinations in various u.s . state jurisdictions for certain tax years , and is under examination in brazil for the 2001 through 2006 tax years and mexico for the 2002 tax year . sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2007 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 88.2 million , including approximately .
Question: without the statutes running in 2007 , what would the total be in thousands of the unrecognized tax benefits?\\n
Answer: | 59893.0 |
FINQA2306 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fair value of financial instruments we believe that the fair values of current assets and current liabilities approximate their reported carrying amounts . the fair values of non-current financial assets , liabilities and derivatives are shown in the following table. .
|( $ in millions )|2005 carrying amount|2005 fair value|2005 carrying amount|fair value|
|notes and other long-term assets|$ 1374|$ 1412|$ 1702|$ 1770|
|long-term debt and other long-term liabilities|$ 1636|$ 1685|$ 848|$ 875|
|derivative instruments|$ 6|$ 6|$ 2014|$ 2014|
we value notes and other receivables based on the expected future cash flows dis- counted at risk-adjusted rates . we determine valuations for long-term debt and other long-term liabilities based on quoted market prices or expected future payments dis- counted at risk-adjusted rates . derivative instruments during 2003 , we entered into an interest rate swap agreement under which we receive a floating rate of interest and pay a fixed rate of interest . the swap modifies our interest rate exposure by effectively converting a note receivable with a fixed rate to a floating rate . the aggregate notional amount of the swap is $ 92 million and it matures in 2010 . the swap is classified as a fair value hedge under fas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities 201d ( 201cfas no . 133 201d ) , and the change in the fair value of the swap , as well as the change in the fair value of the underlying note receivable , is recognized in interest income . the fair value of the swap was a $ 1 million asset at year-end 2005 , and a $ 3 million liability at year-end 2004 . the hedge is highly effective , and therefore , no net gain or loss was reported during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 . during 2005 , we entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage the volatil- ity of the u.s . treasury component of the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance our series f senior notes and the exchange of our series c and e senior notes for new series g senior notes . both swaps were designated as cash flow hedges under fas no . 133 and were terminated upon pricing of the notes . both swaps were highly effective in offsetting fluctuations in the u.s . treasury component . thus , there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings during 2005 . the total amount for these swaps was recorded in other comprehensive income and was a net loss of $ 2 million during 2005 , which will be amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the life of the notes . at year-end 2005 , we had six outstanding interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with the residual interests we retain in conjunction with our timeshare note sales . historically , we were required by purchasers and/or rating agen- cies to utilize interest rate swaps to protect the excess spread within our sold note pools . the aggregate notional amount of the swaps is $ 380 million , and they expire through 2022 . these swaps are not accounted for as hedges under fas no . 133 . the fair value of the swaps is a net asset of $ 5 million at year-end 2005 , and a net asset of approximately $ 3 million at year-end 2004 . we recorded a $ 2 million net gain during 2005 and 2004 , and a $ 3 million net gain during 2003 . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with forecasted timeshare note sales . during 2005 , one swap was designated as a cash flow hedge under fas no . 133 and was highly effective in offsetting interest rate fluctuations . the amount of the ineffectiveness is immaterial . the second swap entered into in 2005 did not qualify for hedge accounting . the non-qualifying swaps resulted in a loss of $ 3 million during 2005 , a gain of $ 2 million during 2004 and a loss of $ 4 million during 2003 . these amounts are included in the gains from the sales of timeshare notes receivable . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign currency exposure related to certain monetary assets . the aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amount of the contracts is $ 544 million at year-end 2005 . the forward exchange contracts do not qualify as hedges in accordance with fas no . 133 . the fair value of the forward contracts is a liability of $ 2 million at year-end 2005 and zero at year-end 2004 . we recorded a $ 26 million gain during 2005 and a $ 3 million and $ 2 million net loss during 2004 and 2003 , respectively , relating to these forward foreign exchange contracts . the net gains and losses for all years were offset by income and losses recorded from translating the related monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies into u.s . dollars . during 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , we entered into foreign exchange option and forward contracts to hedge the potential volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with variations in foreign exchange rates . the aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of the contracts is $ 27 million at year-end 2005 . these contracts have terms of less than one year and are classified as cash flow hedges . changes in their fair values are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income . the fair value of the option contracts is approximately zero at year-end 2005 and 2004 . during 2004 , it was deter- mined that certain derivatives were no longer effective in offsetting the hedged item . thus , cash flow hedge accounting treatment was discontinued and the ineffective con- tracts resulted in a loss of $ 1 million , which was reported in earnings for 2004 . the remaining hedges were highly effective and there was no net gain or loss reported in earnings for 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 . as of year-end 2005 , there were no deferred gains or losses on existing contracts accumulated in other comprehensive income that we expect to reclassify into earnings over the next year . during 2005 , we entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage currency exchange rate volatility associated with certain investments in foreign operations . one contract was designated as a hedge in the net investment of a foreign operation under fas no . 133 . the hedge was highly effective and resulted in a $ 1 million net loss in the cumulative translation adjustment at year-end 2005 . certain contracts did not qualify as hedges under fas no . 133 and resulted in a gain of $ 3 million for 2005 . the contracts offset the losses associated with translation adjustments for various investments in for- eign operations . the contracts have an aggregate dollar equivalent of the notional amounts of $ 229 million and a fair value of approximately zero at year-end 2005 . contingencies guarantees we issue guarantees to certain lenders and hotel owners primarily to obtain long-term management contracts . the guarantees generally have a stated maximum amount of funding and a term of five years or less . the terms of guarantees to lenders generally require us to fund if cash flows from hotel operations are inadequate to cover annual debt service or to repay the loan at the end of the term . the terms of the guarantees to hotel owners generally require us to fund if the hotels do not attain specified levels of 5 0 | m a r r i o t t i n t e r n a t i o n a l , i n c . 2 0 0 5 .
Question: what is the potential gain if the notes and other long-term assets had been sold at the end of 2004?
Answer: | 68.0 |
FINQA2307 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: dispositions of depreciable real estate assets excluded from discontinued operations we recorded a gain on sale of depreciable assets excluded from discontinued operations of $ 190.0 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , an increase of approximately $ 147.3 million from the $ 42.6 million gain on sale of depreciable assets recorded for the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the increase was primarily the result of increased disposition activity . dispositions increased from eight multifamily properties for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , to 21 multifamily properties for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . gain from real estate joint ventures we recorded a gain from real estate joint ventures of $ 6.0 million during the year ended december 31 , 2014 as opposed to no material gain or loss being recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of recording a $ 3.4 million gain for the disposition of ansley village by mid-america multifamily fund ii , or fund ii , as well as a $ 2.8 million gain for the promote fee received from our fund ii partner during 2014 . the promote fee was received as a result of maa achieving certain performance metrics in its management of the fund ii properties over the life of the joint venture . there were no such gains recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2015 . discontinued operations we recorded a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $ 5.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 . we did not record a gain or loss on sale of discontinued operations during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , due to the adoption of asu 2014-08 , reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity , which resulted in dispositions being included in the gain on sale of depreciable real estate assets excluded from discontinued operations and is discussed further below . net income attributable to noncontrolling interests net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was approximately $ 18.5 million , an increase of $ 10.2 million from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . this increase is consistent with the increase to overall net income and is primarily a result of the items discussed above . net income attributable to maa primarily as a result of the items discussed above , net income attributable to maa increased by approximately $ 184.3 million in the year ended december 31 , 2015 from the year ended december 31 , 2014 . comparison of the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2013 the comparison of the year ended december 31 , 2014 to the year ended december 31 , 2013 shows the segment break down based on the 2014 same store portfolios . a comparison using the 2015 same store portfolio would not be comparative due to the nature of the classifications as a result of the merger . property revenues the following table shows our property revenues by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 ( dollars in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2014 year ended december 31 , 2013 increase percentage increase .
||year ended december 31 2014|year ended december 31 2013|increase|percentage increase|
|large market same store|$ 252029|$ 241194|$ 10835|4.5% ( 4.5 % )|
|secondary market same store|246800|242464|4336|1.8% ( 1.8 % )|
|same store portfolio|498829|483658|15171|3.1% ( 3.1 % )|
|non-same store and other|493349|151185|342164|226.3% ( 226.3 % )|
|total|$ 992178|$ 634843|$ 357335|56.3% ( 56.3 % )|
job title mid-america apartment 10-k revision 1 serial <12345678> date sunday , march 20 , 2016 job number 304352-1 type page no . 51 operator abigaels .
Question: what is the percentage of non-same store revenue among the total revenue in 2014?
Answer: | 0.49724 |
FINQA2308 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased slightly , by $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax rate , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , lower other income , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 2408.8|
|retail electric price|69.0|
|transmission equalization|-6.5 ( 6.5 )|
|volume/weather|-6.7 ( 6.7 )|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17.2 ( 17.2 )|
|other|-9.0 ( 9.0 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 2438.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase .
Question: what portion of the change in net income during 2016 was related the irs audit?
Answer: | 0.77594 |
FINQA2309 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a valuation allowance totaling $ 43.9 million , $ 40.4 million and $ 40.1 million as of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 year end , respectively , has been established for deferred income tax assets primarily related to certain subsidiary loss carryforwards that may not be realized . realization of the net deferred income tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration . although realization is not assured , management believes it is more- likely-than-not that the net deferred income tax assets will be realized . the amount of the net deferred income tax assets considered realizable , however , could change in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period fluctuate . the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for 2012 , 2011 and ( amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .
|( amounts in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year|$ 11.0|$ 11.1|$ 17.5|
|gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods|0.7|0.5|0.6|
|gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods|-4.9 ( 4.9 )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|
|gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period|1.2|2.8|3.1|
|settlements with taxing authorities|2013|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|-9.5 ( 9.5 )|
|increase related to acquired business|2013|2013|0.4|
|lapsing of statutes of limitations|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|-1.8 ( 1.8 )|-0.6 ( 0.6 )|
|unrecognized tax benefits at end of year|$ 6.8|$ 11.0|$ 11.1|
of the $ 6.8 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 year end , respectively , approximately $ 4.1 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during 2012 and 2011 , the company reversed a net $ 0.5 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively , of interest and penalties to income associated with unrecognized tax benefits . as of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 year end , the company has provided for $ 1.6 million , $ 1.6 million and $ 2.8 million , respectively , of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits . the unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest and penalties are included in 201cother long-term liabilities 201d on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the united states and in various state , local and foreign jurisdictions . it is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits may either be settled with taxing authorities or the statutes of limitations for such items may lapse within the next 12 months , causing snap-on 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by a range of zero to $ 2.4 million . over the next 12 months , snap-on anticipates taking uncertain tax positions on various tax returns for which the related tax benefit does not meet the recognition threshold . accordingly , snap-on 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits may increase by a range of zero to $ 1.6 million over the next 12 months for uncertain tax positions expected to be taken in future tax filings . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2008 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 492.2 million , $ 416.4 million and $ 386.5 million as of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 year end , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . 2012 annual report 83 .
Question: what is the net change in unrecognized tax benefits in 2012?
Answer: | -4.2 |
FINQA2310 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants . the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement . should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election . the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally . the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) . the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement . on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required . a former executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 4.3 million and $ 11.0 million , respectively . 8 . derivative financial instruments the company enters into interest rate protection agreements to manage exposure on the variable rate debt under its credit facilities and to manage variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure was limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s derivative financial instruments , along with the estimated fair values of the related assets reflected in notes receivable and other long-term assets and ( liabilities ) reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet , are as follows ( in thousands except percentages ) : as of december 31 , 2007 notional amount interest rate term carrying amount and fair value .
|as of december 31 2007|notional amount|interest rate|term|carrying amount and fair value|
|interest rate swap agreement|$ 150000|3.95% ( 3.95 % )|expiring in 2009|$ -369 ( 369 )|
|interest rate swap agreement|100000|4.08% ( 4.08 % )|expiring in 2010|-571 ( 571 )|
|total|$ 250000|||$ -940 ( 940 )|
.
Question: what is the net change in the balance of other long-term notes receivable during 2007?
Answer: | 6.7 |
FINQA2311 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 . we elected to use the step 1 quantitative assessment for our reporting units and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill . there is no significant risk of material goodwill impairment in any of our reporting units , based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment test . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2014 , 2013 or 2012 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|6|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|trademarks|8|
|acquired rights to use technology|8|
|localization|1|
|other intangibles|3|
software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . taxes collected from customers we net taxes collected from customers against those remitted to government authorities in our financial statements . accordingly , taxes collected from customers are not reported as revenue. .
Question: what is the yearly amortization rate related to the trademarks?
Answer: | 12.5 |
FINQA2312 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014 factors affecting sources of liquidity . 201d recent sales of unregistered securities during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 4670335 shares of our class a common stock upon conversion of $ 57.1 million principal amount of our 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes . pursuant to the terms of the indenture , the holders of the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes received 81.808 shares of class a common stock for every $ 1000 principal amount of notes converted . the shares were issued to the noteholders in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . in connection with the conversion , we paid such holders an aggregate of $ 4.9 million , calculated based on the accrued and unpaid interest on the notes and the discounted value of the future interest payments on the notes . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon conversions of additional 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) notes , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we issued an aggregate of 398412 shares of our class a common stock upon exercises of 55729 warrants assumed in our merger with spectrasite , inc . in august 2005 , in connection with our merger with spectrasite , inc. , we assumed approximately 1.0 million warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase 7.15 shares of class a common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . net proceeds from these warrant exercises were approximately $ 1.8 million . the shares of class a common stock issued to the warrantholders upon exercise of the warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . subsequent to december 31 , 2005 , we issued shares of class a common stock upon exercises of additional warrants , as set forth in item 9b of this annual report under the caption 201cother information . 201d issuer purchases of equity securities in november 2005 , we announced that our board of directors had approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock through december 2006 . during the fourth quarter of 2005 , we repurchased 2836519 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 76.6 million pursuant to our stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased ( 1 )|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )|approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions )|
|11/17/05 2013 11/30/05|874306|$ 26.25|874306|$ 727.0|
|12/1/05 2013 12/31/05|1962213|$ 27.29|1962213|$ 673.4|
|total fourth quarter|2836519|$ 26.97|2836519|$ 673.4|
( 1 ) all issuer repurchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced in november 2005 . pursuant to the program , we intend to repurchase up to $ 750.0 million of our class a common stock during the period november 2005 through december 2006 . under the program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we entered into a trading plan under rule 10b5-1 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self- imposed trading blackout periods . the program may be discontinued at any time . since december 31 , 2005 , we have continued to repurchase shares of our class a common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program . between january 1 , 2006 and march 9 , 2006 , we repurchased 3.9 million shares of class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 117.4 million pursuant to the stock repurchase program. .
Question: based on the information what was the number of stock warrants issued for the purchase of spectrasite , inc
Answer: | 0.05625 |
FINQA2313 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fair value of the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired , was $ 17.7 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of sigma-c 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . virtio corporation , inc . ( virtio ) the company acquired virtio on may 15 , 2006 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes that its acquisition of virtio will expand its presence in electronic system level design . the company expects the combination of the company 2019s system studio solution with virtio 2019s virtual prototyping technology will help accelerate systems to market by giving software developers the ability to begin code development earlier than with prevailing methods . purchase price . the company paid $ 9.1 million in cash for the outstanding shares of virtio , of which $ 0.9 million was deposited with an escrow agent and which will be paid to the former stockholders of virtio pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement . in addition , the company had a prior investment in virtio of approximately $ 1.7 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: .
||( in thousands )|
|cash paid|$ 9076|
|prior investment in virtio|1664|
|acquisition-related costs|713|
|total purchase price|$ 11453|
acquisition-related costs of $ 0.7 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 0.3 million of the acquisition-related costs . the $ 0.4 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 primarily consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . under the agreement with virtio , the company has also agreed to pay up to $ 4.3 million over three years to the former stockholders based upon achievement of certain sales milestones . this contingent consideration is considered to be additional purchase price and will be an adjustment to goodwill when and if payment is made . additionally , the company has also agreed to pay $ 0.9 million in employee retention bonuses which will be recognized as compensation expense over the service period of the applicable employees . assets acquired . the company has performed a preliminary valuation and allocated the total purchase consideration to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets based on their respective fair values on the acquisition date . the company acquired $ 2.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 1.9 million in existing technology , $ 0.4 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in non-compete agreements to be amortized over five to seven years . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 5.5 million and assumed liabilities of $ 3.2 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger , was $ 6.7 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of virtio 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . hpl technologies , inc . ( hpl ) the company acquired hpl on december 7 , 2005 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes that the acquisition of hpl will help solidify the company 2019s position as a leading electronic design automation vendor in design for manufacturing ( dfm ) .
Question: what percentage of the total purchase price did intangible assets represent?
Answer: | 0.21828 |
FINQA2314 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 8.21 billion for 2012 , essentially unchanged compared with 2011 . net revenues in securities services were significantly higher compared with 2011 , reflecting a gain of $ 494 million on the sale of our hedge fund administration business . in addition , equities client execution net revenues were higher than 2011 , primarily reflecting significantly higher results in cash products , principally due to increased levels of client activity . these increases were offset by lower commissions and fees , reflecting declines in the united states , europe and asia . our average daily volumes during 2012 were lower in each of these regions compared with 2011 , consistent with listed cash equity market volumes . during 2012 , equities operated in an environment generally characterized by an increase in global equity prices and lower volatility levels . the net loss attributable to the impact of changes in our own credit spreads on borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was $ 714 million ( $ 433 million and $ 281 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2012 , compared with a net gain of $ 596 million ( $ 399 million and $ 197 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2011 . during 2012 , institutional client services operated in an environment generally characterized by continued broad market concerns and uncertainties , although positive developments helped to improve market conditions . these developments included certain central bank actions to ease monetary policy and address funding risks for european financial institutions . in addition , the u.s . economy posted stable to improving economic data , including favorable developments in unemployment and housing . these improvements resulted in tighter credit spreads , higher global equity prices and lower levels of volatility . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and continued political uncertainty , particularly the political debate in the united states surrounding the fiscal cliff , generally resulted in client risk aversion and lower activity levels . also , uncertainty over financial regulatory reform persisted . operating expenses were $ 12.48 billion for 2012 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2011 , primarily due to lower brokerage , clearing , exchange and distribution fees , and lower impairment charges , partially offset by higher net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings . pre- tax earnings were $ 5.64 billion in 2012 , 27% ( 27 % ) higher than 2011 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments , some of which are consolidated , and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|in millions|year ended december 2013|year ended december 2012|year ended december 2011|
|equity securities|$ 3930|$ 2800|$ 603|
|debt securities and loans|1947|1850|96|
|other|1141|1241|1443|
|total net revenues|7018|5891|2142|
|operating expenses|2684|2666|2673|
|pre-tax earnings/ ( loss )|$ 4334|$ 3225|$ -531 ( 531 )|
2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.68 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . 52 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .
Question: operating expenses for 2012 , were what percent of pre- tax earnings?
Answer: | 2.21277 |
FINQA2315 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2030 purchased interests represent senior and subordinated interests , purchased in connection with secondary market-making activities , in securitization entities in which the firm also holds retained interests . 2030 substantially all of the total outstanding principal amount and total retained interests relate to securitizations during 2014 and thereafter as of december 2018 , and relate to securitizations during 2012 and thereafter as of december 2017 . 2030 the fair value of retained interests was $ 3.28 billion as of december 2018 and $ 2.13 billion as of december 2017 . in addition to the interests in the table above , the firm had other continuing involvement in the form of derivative transactions and commitments with certain nonconsolidated vies . the carrying value of these derivatives and commitments was a net asset of $ 75 million as of december 2018 and $ 86 million as of december 2017 , and the notional amount of these derivatives and commitments was $ 1.09 billion as of december 2018 and $ 1.26 billion as of december 2017 . the notional amounts of these derivatives and commitments are included in maximum exposure to loss in the nonconsolidated vie table in note 12 . the table below presents information about the weighted average key economic assumptions used in measuring the fair value of mortgage-backed retained interests. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2018|as of december 2017|
|fair value of retained interests|$ 3151|$ 2071|
|weighted average life ( years )|7.2|6.0|
|constant prepayment rate|11.9% ( 11.9 % )|9.4% ( 9.4 % )|
|impact of 10% ( 10 % ) adverse change|$ -27 ( 27 )|$ -19 ( 19 )|
|impact of 20% ( 20 % ) adverse change|$ -53 ( 53 )|$ -35 ( 35 )|
|discount rate|4.7% ( 4.7 % )|4.2% ( 4.2 % )|
|impact of 10% ( 10 % ) adverse change|$ -75 ( 75 )|$ -35 ( 35 )|
|impact of 20% ( 20 % ) adverse change|$ -147 ( 147 )|$ -70 ( 70 )|
in the table above : 2030 amounts do not reflect the benefit of other financial instruments that are held to mitigate risks inherent in these retained interests . 2030 changes in fair value based on an adverse variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value is not usually linear . 2030 the impact of a change in a particular assumption is calculated independently of changes in any other assumption . in practice , simultaneous changes in assumptions might magnify or counteract the sensitivities disclosed above . 2030 the constant prepayment rate is included only for positions for which it is a key assumption in the determination of fair value . 2030 the discount rate for retained interests that relate to u.s . government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations does not include any credit loss . expected credit loss assumptions are reflected in the discount rate for the remainder of retained interests . the firm has other retained interests not reflected in the table above with a fair value of $ 133 million and a weighted average life of 4.2 years as of december 2018 , and a fair value of $ 56 million and a weighted average life of 4.5 years as of december 2017 . due to the nature and fair value of certain of these retained interests , the weighted average assumptions for constant prepayment and discount rates and the related sensitivity to adverse changes are not meaningful as of both december 2018 and december 2017 . the firm 2019s maximum exposure to adverse changes in the value of these interests is the carrying value of $ 133 million as of december 2018 and $ 56 million as of december 2017 . note 12 . variable interest entities a variable interest in a vie is an investment ( e.g. , debt or equity ) or other interest ( e.g. , derivatives or loans and lending commitments ) that will absorb portions of the vie 2019s expected losses and/or receive portions of the vie 2019s expected residual returns . the firm 2019s variable interests in vies include senior and subordinated debt ; loans and lending commitments ; limited and general partnership interests ; preferred and common equity ; derivatives that may include foreign currency , equity and/or credit risk ; guarantees ; and certain of the fees the firm receives from investment funds . certain interest rate , foreign currency and credit derivatives the firm enters into with vies are not variable interests because they create , rather than absorb , risk . vies generally finance the purchase of assets by issuing debt and equity securities that are either collateralized by or indexed to the assets held by the vie . the debt and equity securities issued by a vie may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . the firm 2019s involvement with vies includes securitization of financial assets , as described in note 11 , and investments in and loans to other types of vies , as described below . see note 11 for further information about securitization activities , including the definition of beneficial interests . see note 3 for the firm 2019s consolidation policies , including the definition of a vie . goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k 149 .
Question: what was the change in the weighted average life ( years ) as of december 2018 and december 2017?\\n
Answer: | 1.2 |
FINQA2316 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: gain on business divestitures and impairments , net we strive to have a number one or number two market position in each of the markets we serve , or have a clear path on how we will achieve a leading market position over time . where we cannot establish a leading market position , or where operations are not generating acceptable returns , we may decide to divest certain assets and reallocate resources to other markets . asset or business divestitures could result in gains , losses or asset impairment charges that may be material to our results of operations in a given period . during 2018 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 44.9 million . during 2017 , we recorded a net gain on business divestitures , net of asset impairments of $ 27.1 million . we also recorded a gain on business divestitures of $ 6.8 million due to the transfer of ownership of the landfill gas collection and control system and the remaining post-closure and environmental liabilities associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we recorded a charge to earnings of $ 4.6 million primarily related to environmental costs associated with one of our divested landfills . during 2016 , we also recorded a net gain related to a business divestiture of $ 4.7 million . restructuring charges in january 2018 , we eliminated certain positions following the consolidation of select back-office functions , including but not limited to the integration of our national accounts support functions into our existing corporate support functions . these changes include a reduction in administrative staffing and the closure of certain office locations . during 2018 , we incurred restructuring charges of $ 26.4 million that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , the closure of offices with non-cancelable lease agreements , and the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems . we paid $ 24.7 million during 2018 related to these restructuring efforts . in january 2016 , we realigned our field support functions by combining our three regions into two field groups , consolidating our areas and streamlining select operational support roles at our phoenix headquarters . additionally , in the second quarter of 2016 , we began the redesign of our back-office functions as well as the consolidation of over 100 customer service locations into three customer resource centers . the redesign of our back-office functions and upgrades to certain of our software systems continued into 2018 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we incurred $ 17.6 million and $ 40.7 million of restructuring charges , respectively , that primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits , transition costs , relocation benefits , and the closure of offices with lease agreements with non-cancelable terms . the savings realized from these restructuring efforts have been reinvested in our customer-focused programs and initiatives . interest expense the following table provides the components of interest expense , including accretion of debt discounts and accretion of discounts primarily associated with environmental and risk insurance liabilities assumed in acquisitions ( in millions of dollars ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations|$ 349.4|$ 324.8|$ 324.1|
|non-cash interest|41.2|43.6|53.4|
|less : capitalized interest|-6.8 ( 6.8 )|-6.5 ( 6.5 )|-6.2 ( 6.2 )|
|total interest expense|$ 383.8|$ 361.9|$ 371.3|
total interest expense for 2018 increased compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in debt outstanding during the period and higher interest rates on floating rate debt . total interest expense for 2017 decreased .
Question: what was the growth in the interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations from 2017 to 2018
Answer: | 0.07574 |
FINQA2317 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses decreased slightly during 2012 by $ 4.7 to $ 137.3 compared to 2011 , primarily due to lower office and general expenses , partially offset by an increase in temporary help to support our information-technology system-upgrade initiatives . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .
|cash flow data|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|years ended december 31 , 2011|
|net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1|$ 598.4|$ 697.2|$ 735.7|
|net cash used in working capital b2|-9.6 ( 9.6 )|-293.2 ( 293.2 )|-359.4 ( 359.4 )|
|changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash|4.1|-46.8 ( 46.8 )|-102.8 ( 102.8 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 592.9|$ 357.2|$ 273.5|
|net cash used in investing activities|-224.5 ( 224.5 )|-210.2 ( 210.2 )|-58.8 ( 58.8 )|
|net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities|-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )|131.3|-541.0 ( 541.0 )|
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . net cash provided by operating activities during 2012 was $ 357.2 , which was an increase of $ 83.7 as compared to 2011 , primarily as a result of a decrease in working capital usage of $ 66.2 . the net working capital usage in 2012 was primarily impacted by our media businesses . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues , and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily relates to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 relate primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013. .
Question: for net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 , how much was lost due to the decrease in net income?
Answer: | 47.9 |
FINQA2318 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis other principal transactions revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 3.20 billion for 2016 , 36% ( 36 % ) lower than 2015 , primarily due to significantly lower revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance . in addition , revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges . losses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities . net interest income . net interest income in the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 2.59 billion for 2016 , 16% ( 16 % ) lower than 2015 , reflecting an increase in interest expense primarily due to the impact of higher interest rates on other interest-bearing liabilities , interest- bearing deposits and collateralized financings , and increases in total average long-term borrowings and total average interest-bearing deposits . the increase in interest expense was partially offset by higher interest income related to collateralized agreements , reflecting the impact of higher interest rates , and loans receivable , reflecting an increase in total average balances and the impact of higher interest rates . see 201cstatistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share- based compensation programs and the external environment . in addition , see 201cuse of estimates 201d for further information about expenses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings . in the context of the challenging environment , we completed an initiative during 2016 that identified areas where we can operate more efficiently , resulting in a reduction of approximately $ 900 million in annual run rate compensation . for 2016 , net savings from this initiative , after severance and other related costs , were approximately $ 500 million . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( including employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2017|year ended december 2016|year ended december 2015|
|compensation and benefits|$ 11853|$ 11647|$ 12678|
|brokerage clearing exchangeand distribution fees|2540|2555|2576|
|market development|588|457|557|
|communications and technology|897|809|806|
|depreciation and amortization|1152|998|991|
|occupancy|733|788|772|
|professional fees|965|882|963|
|other expenses|2213|2168|5699|
|totalnon-compensationexpenses|9088|8657|12364|
|total operating expenses|$ 20941|$ 20304|$ 25042|
|total staff atperiod-end|36600|34400|36800|
in the table above , other expenses for 2015 included $ 3.37 billion recorded for the settlement agreement with the rmbs working group . see note 27 to the consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8 of our annual report on form 10-k for the year ended december 31 , 2015 for further information . 2017 versus 2016 . operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 20.94 billion for 2017 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2016 . compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 11.85 billion for 2017 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2016 . the ratio of compensation and benefits to net revenues for 2017 was 37.0% ( 37.0 % ) compared with 38.1% ( 38.1 % ) for 2016 . non-compensation expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 9.09 billion for 2017 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily driven by our investments to fund growth . the increase compared with 2016 reflected higher expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform , marcus : by goldman sachs ( marcus ) . these increases were primarily included in depreciation and amortization expenses , market development expenses and other expenses . in addition , technology expenses increased , reflecting higher expenses related to cloud-based services and software depreciation , and professional fees increased , primarily related to consulting costs . these increases were partially offset by lower net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings , and lower occupancy expenses ( primarily related to exit costs in 2016 ) . net provisions for litigation and regulatory proceedings for 2017 were $ 188 million compared with $ 396 million for 2016 . 2017 included a $ 127 million charitable contribution to goldman sachs gives , our donor-advised fund . compensation was reduced to fund this charitable contribution to goldman sachs gives . we ask our participating managing directors to make recommendations regarding potential charitable recipients for this contribution . 54 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .
Question: what portion of total operating expenses is related to compensation and benefits in 2017?
Answer: | 0.56602 |
FINQA2319 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 . shareholders 2019 equity . common stock . changes in shares of common stock outstanding for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 were as follows ( share data in millions ) : fiscal fiscal .
||fiscal 2007|fiscal 2006|
|shares outstanding at beginning of period|1049|1058|
|net impact of stock option exercises and other share issuances|59|43|
|treasury stock purchases|-52 ( 52 )|-52 ( 52 )|
|shares outstanding at end of period|1056|1049|
treasury shares . during fiscal 2007 , the company purchased $ 3.8 billion of its common stock through open market purchases at an average cost of $ 72.65 per share . during fiscal 2006 , the company purchased $ 3.4 billion of its common stock through open market purchases at an average cost of $ 65.43 per share . in december 2006 , the company announced that its board of directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $ 6 billion of the company 2019s outstanding common stock . this share repurchase authorization considers , among other things , business segment capital needs , as well as equity-based compensation and benefit plan requirements . as of november 30 , 2007 , the company had approximately $ 2.3 billion remaining under its current share repurchase authorization . rabbi trusts . the company has established rabbi trusts ( the 201crabbi trusts 201d ) to provide common stock voting rights to certain employees who hold outstanding restricted stock units . the number of shares of common stock outstanding in the rabbi trusts was approximately 107 million at november 30 , 2007 and approximately 81 million at november 30 , 2006 . the assets of the rabbi trusts are consolidated with those of the company , and the value of the company 2019s stock held in the rabbi trusts is classified in shareholders 2019 equity and generally accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock . preferred stock . in july 2006 , the company issued 44000000 depositary shares , in an aggregate of $ 1100 million . each depositary share represents 1/1000th of a share of floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock , series a , $ 0.01 par value ( 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) . the series a preferred stock is redeemable at the company 2019s option , in whole or in part , on or after july 15 , 2011 at a redemption price of $ 25000 per share ( equivalent to $ 25 per depositary share ) . the series a preferred stock also has a preference over the company 2019s common stock upon liquidation . subsequent to fiscal year-end , the company declared a quarterly dividend of $ 379.66 per share of series a preferred stock that was paid on january 15 , 2008 to preferred shareholders of record on december 31 , 2007 . regulatory requirements . on april 1 , 2007 , the company merged msdwi into ms&co . upon completion of the merger , the surviving entity , ms&co. , became the company 2019s principal u.s . broker-dealer . ms&co . is a registered broker-dealer and registered futures commission merchant and , accordingly , is subject to the minimum net capital requirements of the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) , the financial industry regulatory authority and the commodity futures trading commission . ms&co . has consistently operated in excess of these requirements . ms&co . 2019s net capital totaled $ 6673 million at november 30 , 2007 , which exceeded the amount required by $ 4950 million . msip , a london-based broker-dealer subsidiary , is subject to the capital requirements of the financial services authority , and msjs , a tokyo-based broker-dealer subsidiary , is subject to the capital requirements of the financial services agency . msip and msjs consistently operated in excess of their respective regulatory capital requirements. .
Question: what was the net change in common stock outstanding in millions between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: | 7.0 |
FINQA2320 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: which , $ 44.9 million , or $ 38.2 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months . we also enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity 2019s functional currency . as a result , any foreign currency translation gains/losses recognized in earnings under sfas no . 52 , 201cforeign currency translation 201d are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period . other comprehensive income 2013 other comprehensive income refers to revenues , expenses , gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized foreign currency hedge gains and losses , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : balance at december 31 , comprehensive income ( loss ) balance at december 31 .
||balance at december 31 2006|other comprehensive income ( loss )|balance at december 31 2007|
|foreign currency translation|$ 267.7|$ 101.1|$ 368.8|
|foreign currency hedges|-22.6 ( 22.6 )|-22.8 ( 22.8 )|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|
|unrealized gains ( losses ) on securities|-0.5 ( 0.5 )|-1.4 ( 1.4 )|-1.9 ( 1.9 )|
|unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized ( gain ) / loss in actuarial assumptions|-35.4 ( 35.4 )|4.2|-31.2 ( 31.2 )|
|accumulated other comprehensive income|$ 209.2|$ 81.1|$ 290.3|
treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity . we may reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . accounting pronouncements 2013 in june 2006 , the fasb issued interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , an interpretation of fas 109 , accounting for income taxes 201d ( fin 48 ) , to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions . see our income tax disclosures in note 11 for more information regarding the adoption of fin 48 . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans 2013 an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this statement requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position . sfas no . 158 also requires recognition in other comprehensive income of certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules , as well as modifies the timing of reporting and adds certain disclosures . the statement provides recognition and disclosure elements to be effective as of the end of the fiscal year after december 15 , 2006 and measurement elements to be effective for fiscal years ending after december 15 , 2008 . we adopted sfas no . 158 on december 31 , 2006 . see our pension and other postretirement disclosures in note 10 . in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no . 123 ( r ) , 201cshare-based payment 201d , which is a revision to sfas no . 123 . sfas 123 ( r ) requires all share-based payments to employees , including stock options , to be expensed based on their fair values . we adopted sfas 123 ( r ) on january 1 , 2006 using the modified prospective method and did not restate prior periods . in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements 201d , which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this statement does not require any new fair value measurements , but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information . sfas no . 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . in february 2008 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( fsp ) no . sfas 157-2 , which delays the effective date of certain provisions of sfas no . 157 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of sfas no . 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . in february 2007 , the fasb issued sfas no . 159 , 201cthe fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities 2013 including an amendment of fasb statement no . 115 201d ( sfas no . 159 ) . sfas no . 159 creates a 201cfair value option 201d under which an entity may elect to record certain financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition . subsequent changes in fair value would be recognized in earnings as those changes occur . the election of the fair value option would be made on a contract-by-contract basis and would need to be supported by concurrent documentation or a preexisting documented policy . sfas no . 159 requires an entity to separately disclose the fair z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 7 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the change in percentage of accumulated other comprehensive income from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: | 0.38767 |
FINQA2321 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: bhge 2018 form 10-k | 85 it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months due to expiring statutes , audit activity , tax payments , and competent authority proceedings related to transfer pricing or final decisions in matters that are the subject of litigation in various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . at december 31 , 2018 , we had approximately $ 96 million of tax liabilities , net of $ 1 million of tax assets , related to uncertain tax positions , each of which are individually insignificant , and each of which are reasonably possible of being settled within the next twelve months . we conduct business in more than 120 countries and are subject to income taxes in most taxing jurisdictions in which we operate . all internal revenue service examinations have been completed and closed through year end 2015 for the most significant u.s . returns . we believe there are no other jurisdictions in which the outcome of unresolved issues or claims is likely to be material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we further believe that we have made adequate provision for all income tax uncertainties . note 13 . stock-based compensation in july 2017 , we adopted the bhge 2017 long-term incentive plan ( lti plan ) under which we may grant stock options and other equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors providing services to the company and our subsidiaries . a total of up to 57.4 million shares of class a common stock are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 . a total of 46.2 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 . stock-based compensation cost was $ 121 million and $ 37 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant . the compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures . there were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material . stock options we may grant stock options to our officers , directors and key employees . stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date . the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black- scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan . the expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding . the expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards . the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period . the risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted . the dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. .
||2018|2017|
|expected life ( years )|6|6|
|risk-free interest rate|2.5% ( 2.5 % )|2.1% ( 2.1 % )|
|volatility|33.7% ( 33.7 % )|36.4% ( 36.4 % )|
|dividend yield|2% ( 2 % )|1.2% ( 1.2 % )|
|weighted average fair value per share at grant date|$ 10.34|$ 12.32|
baker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements .
Question: what is the percent change in weighted average fair value per share at grant date from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.19149 |
FINQA2322 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shares of common stock issued , in treasury , and outstanding were ( in thousands of shares ) : .
||shares issued|treasury shares|shares outstanding|
|balance at december 29 2013|376832|2014|376832|
|exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other|178|2014|178|
|balance at december 28 2014|377010|2014|377010|
|exercise of warrants|20480|2014|20480|
|issuance of common stock to sponsors|221666|2014|221666|
|acquisition of kraft foods group inc .|592898|2014|592898|
|exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other|2338|-413 ( 413 )|1925|
|balance at january 3 2016|1214392|-413 ( 413 )|1213979|
|exercise of stock options issuance of other stock awards and other|4555|-2058 ( 2058 )|2497|
|balance at december 31 2016|1218947|-2471 ( 2471 )|1216476|
note 13 . financing arrangements we routinely enter into accounts receivable securitization and factoring programs . we account for transfers of receivables pursuant to these programs as a sale and remove them from our consolidated balance sheet . at december 31 , 2016 , our most significant program in place was the u.s . securitization program , which was amended in may 2016 and originally entered into in october of 2015 . under the program , we are entitled to receive cash consideration of up to $ 800 million ( which we elected to reduce to $ 500 million , effective february 21 , 2017 ) and a receivable for the remainder of the purchase price ( the 201cdeferred purchase price 201d ) . this securitization program utilizes a bankruptcy- remote special-purpose entity ( 201cspe 201d ) . the spe is wholly-owned by a subsidiary of kraft heinz and its sole business consists of the purchase or acceptance , through capital contributions of receivables and related assets , from a kraft heinz subsidiary and subsequent transfer of such receivables and related assets to a bank . although the spe is included in our consolidated financial statements , it is a separate legal entity with separate creditors who will be entitled , upon its liquidation , to be satisfied out of the spe's assets prior to any assets or value in the spe becoming available to kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . the assets of the spe are not available to pay creditors of kraft heinz or its subsidiaries . this program expires in may 2017 . in addition to the u.s . securitization program , we have accounts receivable factoring programs denominated in australian dollars , new zealand dollars , british pound sterling , euros , and japanese yen . under these programs , we generally receive cash consideration up to a certain limit and a receivable for the deferred purchase price . there is no deferred purchase price associated with the japanese yen contract . related to these programs , our aggregate cash consideration limit , after applying applicable hold-backs , was $ 245 million u.s . dollars at december 31 , 2016 . generally , each of these programs automatically renews annually until terminated by either party . the cash consideration and carrying amount of receivables removed from the consolidated balance sheets in connection with the above programs were $ 904 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 267 million at january 3 , 2016 . the fair value of the deferred purchase price for the programs was $ 129 million at december 31 , 2016 and $ 583 million at january 3 , 2016 . the deferred purchase price is included in sold receivables on the consolidated balance sheets and had a carrying value which approximated its fair value at december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 . the proceeds from these sales are recognized on the consolidated statements of cash flows as a component of operating activities . we act as servicer for these arrangements and have not recorded any servicing assets or liabilities for these arrangements as of december 31 , 2016 and january 3 , 2016 because they were not material to the financial statements. .
Question: what portion of the issued shares is reported as treasury stock as of december 31 , 2016?
Answer: | 0.00203 |
FINQA2323 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in 2017 , cash flows provided by operations increased $ 160 million , primarily due to an increase in net income after non-cash adjustments , including the impact of the enactment of the tcja , and an increase in cash flows from working capital . the main factors contributing to the net income increase are described in the 201cconsolidated results of operations 201d section and include higher operating revenues , partially offset by higher income taxes due to a $ 125 million re-measurement charge resulting from the impact of the change in the federal tax rate on the company 2019s deferred income taxes from the enactment of the tcja . the increase in non-cash activities was mainly attributable to the increase in deferred income taxes , as mentioned above , and an increase in depreciation and amortization due to additional utility plant placed in service . the change in working capital was principally due to ( i ) the timing of accounts payable and accrued liabilities , including the accrual recorded during 2016 for the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia , ( ii ) a decrease in unbilled revenues as a result of our military services group achieving significant capital project milestones during 2016 , and ( iii ) a change in other current assets and liabilities , including the decrease in other current assets associated with the termination of our four forward starting swap agreements and timing of payments clearing our cash accounts . the company expects to make pension contributions to the plan trusts of up to $ 31 million in 2019 . in addition , we estimate that contributions will amount to $ 32 million , $ 29 million , $ 29 million and $ 29 million in 2020 , 2021 , 2022 and 2023 , respectively . actual amounts contributed could change materially from these estimates as a result of changes in assumptions and actual investment returns , among other factors . cash flows used in investing activities the following table provides a summary of the major items affecting our cash flows used in investing activities: .
|( in millions )|for the years ended december 31 , 2018|for the years ended december 31 , 2017|for the years ended december 31 , 2016|
|net capital expenditures|$ -1586 ( 1586 )|$ -1434 ( 1434 )|$ -1311 ( 1311 )|
|acquisitions|-398 ( 398 )|-177 ( 177 )|-204 ( 204 )|
|other investing activities net ( a )|-52 ( 52 )|-61 ( 61 )|-75 ( 75 )|
|net cash flows used in investing activities|$ -2036 ( 2036 )|$ -1672 ( 1672 )|$ -1590 ( 1590 )|
( a ) includes removal costs from property , plant and equipment retirements and proceeds from sale of assets . in 2018 and 2017 , cash flows used in investing activities increased primarily due to an increase in our regulated capital expenditures , principally from incremental investments associated with the replacement and renewal of our transmission and distribution infrastructure in our regulated businesses , as well as acquisitions in both our regulated businesses and market-based businesses , as discussed below . our infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs , where we replace infrastructure , as needed , and major capital investment projects , where we construct new water and wastewater treatment and delivery facilities to meet new customer growth and water quality regulations . our projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision to reflect changes in economic conditions and other factors. .
Question: in 2018 , what percentage of cash flows used in investing activities composed of acquisitions?
Answer: | 0.19548 |
FINQA2324 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .
|fiscal years|operating leases|
|2011|$ 21871|
|2012|12322|
|2013|9078|
|2014|6381|
|2015|5422|
|later years|30655|
|total|$ 85729|
12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the percentage change in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s employees in 2010?
Answer: | -0.04651 |
FINQA2325 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . the table below presents market risk for positions that are not included in var . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories and therefore have not been aggregated . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2012 2011 .
|asset categories|asset categories||
|in millions|2012|2011|
|icbc|$ 208|$ 212|
|equity ( excluding icbc ) 1|2263|2458|
|debt2|1676|1521|
equity ( excluding icbc ) 1 2263 2458 debt 2 1676 1521 1 . relates to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in firm-sponsored hedge funds . 2 . primarily relates to interests in our firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments . also includes loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a $ 3 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a $ 7 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . the firm engages in insurance activities where we reinsure and purchase portfolios of insurance risk and pension liabilities . the risks associated with these activities include , but are not limited to : equity price , interest rate , reinvestment and mortality risk . the firm mitigates risks associated with insurance activities through the use of reinsurance and hedging . certain of the assets associated with the firm 2019s insurance activities are included in var . in addition to the positions included in var , we held $ 9.07 billion of securities accounted for as available-for- sale as of december 2012 , which support the firm 2019s reinsurance business . as of december 2012 , our available- for-sale securities primarily consisted of $ 3.63 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 4% ( 4 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 3.38 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 6% ( 6 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 856 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years . as of december 2012 , such assets were classified as held for sale and were included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about assets held for sale . as of december 2011 , we held $ 4.86 billion of securities accounted for as available-for-sale , primarily consisting of $ 1.81 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 5% ( 5 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 1.42 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 10% ( 10 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 662 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years . in addition , as of december 2012 and december 2011 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments . as of december 2012 , the firm also had $ 6.50 billion of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 62 million of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . additionally , we make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in 201cother assets 201d in the consolidated statements of financial condition . direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation . see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on 201cother assets . 201d goldman sachs 2012 annual report 93 .
Question: as of december 2012 , what percentage of available- for-sale securities was comprised of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities?
Answer: | 0.41274 |
FINQA2326 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents .
|assumptions used in monte carlo lattice pricing model|year ended december 31 , 2016|year ended december 31 , 2015|year ended december 31 , 2014|
|risk-free interest rate|1.0% ( 1.0 % )|1.1% ( 1.1 % )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|
|expected dividend yield|2014% ( 2014 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|2014% ( 2014 % )|
|expected volatility 2014ansys stock price|21% ( 21 % )|23% ( 23 % )|25% ( 25 % )|
|expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index|16% ( 16 % )|14% ( 14 % )|15% ( 15 % )|
|expected term|2.8 years|2.8 years|2.8 years|
|correlation factor|0.65|0.60|0.70|
the company issued 35000 , 115485 and 39900 performance-based restricted stock awards during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . of the cumulative performance-based restricted stock awards issued , defined operating metrics were assigned to 63462 , 51795 and 20667 awards with grant-date fair values of $ 84.61 , $ 86.38 and $ 81.52 during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the grant-date fair value of the awards is being recorded from the grant date through the conclusion of the measurement period associated with each operating metric based on management's estimates concerning the probability of vesting . as of december 31 , 2016 , 7625 units of the total 2014 awards granted were earned and will be issued in 2017 . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 0.4 million , $ 0.4 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively . in addition , in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company granted restricted stock units of 488622 , 344500 and 364150 , respectively , that will vest over a three- or four-year period with weighted-average grant-date fair values of $ 88.51 , $ 86.34 and $ 82.13 , respectively . during 2016 and 2015 , 162019 and 85713 shares vested and were released , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , 838327 , 571462 and 344750 units were outstanding , respectively . total compensation expense is being recorded over the service period and was $ 19.1 million , $ 12.5 million and $ 5.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . in conjunction with a 2015 acquisition , ansys issued 68451 shares of replacement restricted stock with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $ 90.48 . of the $ 6.2 million grant-date fair value , $ 3.5 million , related to partially vested awards , was recorded as non-cash purchase price consideration . the remaining fair value will be recognized as stock compensation expense through the conclusion of the service period . during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the company recorded $ 1.2 million and $ 0.6 million , respectively , of stock compensation expense related to these awards . in conjunction with a 2011 acquisition , the company granted performance-based restricted stock awards . vesting was determined based on the achievements of certain revenue and operating income targets of the entity post-acquisition . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 4.7 million . the company has granted deferred stock awards to non-affiliate independent directors , which are rights to receive shares of common stock upon termination of service as a director . in 2015 and prior , the deferred stock awards were granted quarterly in arrears and vested immediately upon grant . associated with these awards , the company established a non-qualified 409 ( a ) deferred compensation plan with assets held under a rabbi trust to provide directors an opportunity to diversify their vested awards . during open trading windows and at their elective option , the directors may convert their company shares into a variety of non-company-stock investment options in order to diversify their holdings . as of december 31 , 2016 , 5000 shares have been diversified and 184099 undiversified deferred stock awards have vested with the underlying shares remaining unissued until the service termination of the respective director owners . in may 2016 , the company granted 38400 deferred stock awards which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 1.9 million , $ 4.0 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index from 2015 to 2016 16% ( 16 % ) 14% ( 14 % )
Answer: | 0.14286 |
FINQA2327 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2011|
|indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names|$ 218883|$ 225679|
|impairment charge|-17356 ( 17356 )|2014|
|foreign currency translation adjustment|3339|-6796 ( 6796 )|
|total|$ 204866|$ 218883|
during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what was the percentage decline in the value of the intangible assets from 2011 to 2012
Answer: | -0.06404 |
FINQA2328 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. .
|benchmark|2011|2010|2009|
|wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )|$ 95.11|$ 79.61|$ 62.09|
|western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )|77.97|65.31|52.13|
|aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )|$ 3.68|$ 3.89|$ 3.49|
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .
Question: how much has the western canadian select dollars per bbl increased since 2009?
Answer: | 0.49568 |
FINQA2329 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consumer foods net sales increased $ 303 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for the year to $ 6.8 billion . results reflect an increase of three percentage points from improved net pricing and product mix and two percentage points of improvement from higher volumes . net pricing and volume improvements were achieved in many of the company 2019s priority investment and enabler brands . the impact of product recalls partially offset these improvements . the company implemented significant price increases for many consumer foods products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 . continued net sales improvements are expected into fiscal 2009 when the company expects to receive the benefit of these pricing actions for full fiscal periods . sales of some of the company 2019s most significant brands , including chef boyardee ae , david ae , egg beaters ae , healthy choice ae , hebrew national ae , hunt 2019s ae , marie callender 2019s ae , manwich ae , orville redenbacher 2019s ae , pam ae , ro*tel ae , rosarita ae , snack pack ae , swiss miss ae , wesson ae , and wolf ae grew in fiscal 2008 . sales of act ii ae , andy capp ae , banquet ae , crunch 2018n munch ae , kid cuisine ae , parkay ae , pemmican ae , reddi-wip ae , and slim jim ae declined in fiscal 2008 . net sales in the consumer foods segment are not comparable across periods due to a variety of factors . the company initiated a peanut butter recall in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and reintroduced peter pan ae peanut butter products in august 2007 . sales of all peanut butter products , including both branded and private label , in fiscal 2008 were $ 14 million lower than comparable amounts in fiscal 2007 . consumer foods net sales were also adversely impacted by the recall of banquet ae and private label pot pies in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . net sales of pot pies were lower by approximately $ 22 million in fiscal 2008 , relative to fiscal 2007 , primarily due to product returns and lost sales of banquet ae and private label pot pies . sales from alexia foods and lincoln snacks , businesses acquired in fiscal 2008 , totaled $ 66 million in fiscal 2008 . the company divested a refrigerated pizza business during the first half of fiscal 2007 . sales from this business were $ 17 million in fiscal food and ingredients net sales were $ 4.1 billion in fiscal 2008 , an increase of $ 706 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) . increased sales are reflective of higher sales prices in the company 2019s milling operations due to higher grain prices , and price and volume increases in the company 2019s potato and dehydrated vegetable operations . the fiscal 2007 divestiture of an oat milling operation resulted in a reduction of sales of $ 27 million for fiscal 2008 , partially offset by increased sales of $ 18 million from the acquisition of watts brothers in february 2008 . international foods net sales increased $ 65 million to $ 678 million . the strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the u.s . dollar accounted for approximately $ 36 million of this increase . the segment achieved a 5% ( 5 % ) increase in sales volume in fiscal 2008 , primarily reflecting increased unit sales in canada and mexico , and modest increases in net pricing . gross profit ( net sales less cost of goods sold ) ( $ in millions ) reporting segment fiscal 2008 gross profit fiscal 2007 gross profit % ( % ) increase/ ( decrease ) .
|reporting segment|fiscal 2008 gross profit|fiscal 2007 gross profit|% ( % ) increase/ ( decrease )|
|consumer foods|$ 1802|$ 1923|( 6 ) % ( % )|
|food and ingredients|724|590|23% ( 23 % )|
|international foods|190|180|6% ( 6 % )|
|total|$ 2716|$ 2693|1% ( 1 % )|
the company 2019s gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $ 2.7 billion , an increase of $ 23 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , over the prior year . the increase in gross profit was largely driven by results in the food and ingredients segment , reflecting higher margins in the company 2019s milling and specialty potato operations , largely offset by reduced gross profits in the consumer foods segment . costs of implementing the company 2019s restructuring plans reduced gross profit by $ 4 million and $ 46 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what percent of total gross profit in fiscal 2007 was contributed by consumer foods?
Answer: | 0.71407 |
FINQA2330 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hlikk has four revolving credit facilities in support of operations . two of the credit facilities have no amounts drawn as of december 31 , 2013 with borrowing limits of approximately a55 billion , or $ 48 each , and individually have expiration dates of january 5 , 2015 and september 30 , 2014 . in december 2013 , hlikk entered into two new revolving credit facility agreements with two japanese banks in order to finance certain withholding taxes on mutual fund gains , that are subsequently credited when hlikk files its 2019 income tax returns . at december 31 , 2013 , hlikk had drawn the total borrowing limits of a55 billion , or $ 48 , and a520 billion , or $ 190 on these credit facilities . the a55 billion credit facility accrues interest at a variable rate based on the one month tokyo interbank offering rate ( tibor ) plus 3 bps , which as of december 31 , 2013 the interest rate was 15 bps , and the a520 billion credit facility accrues interest at a variable rate based on tibor plus 3 bps , or the actual cost of funding , which as of december 31 , 2013 the interest rate was 20 bps . both of the credit facilities expire on september 30 , 2014 . derivative commitments certain of the company 2019s derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial strength ratings of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement as set by nationally recognized statistical rating agencies . if the legal entity 2019s financial strength were to fall below certain ratings , the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement . the settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each agreement . if the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties , it could impact the legal entity 2019s ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the legal entity . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of december 31 , 2013 was $ 1.2 billion . of this $ 1.2 billion the legal entities have posted collateral of $ 1.4 billion in the normal course of business . in addition , the company has posted collateral of $ 44 associated with a customized gmwb derivative . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2013 , a downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p could require approximately an additional $ 12 to be posted as collateral . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2013 , a downgrade by either moody 2019s or s&p of two levels below the legal entities 2019 current financial strength ratings could require approximately an additional $ 33 of assets to be posted as collateral . these collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change , as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in contractual terms are negotiated . the nature of the collateral that we would post , if required , would be primarily in the form of u.s . treasury bills , u.s . treasury notes and government agency securities . as of december 31 , 2013 , the aggregate notional amount and fair value of derivative relationships that could be subject to immediate termination in the event of rating agency downgrades to either bbb+ or baa1 was $ 536 and $ ( 17 ) , respectively . insurance operations current and expected patterns of claim frequency and severity or surrenders may change from period to period but continue to be within historical norms and , therefore , the company 2019s insurance operations 2019 current liquidity position is considered to be sufficient to meet anticipated demands over the next twelve months , including any obligations related to the company 2019s restructuring activities . for a discussion and tabular presentation of the company 2019s current contractual obligations by period , refer to off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations within the capital resources and liquidity section of the md&a . the principal sources of operating funds are premiums , fees earned from assets under management and investment income , while investing cash flows originate from maturities and sales of invested assets . the primary uses of funds are to pay claims , claim adjustment expenses , commissions and other underwriting expenses , to purchase new investments and to make dividend payments to the hfsg holding company . the company 2019s insurance operations consist of property and casualty insurance products ( collectively referred to as 201cproperty & casualty operations 201d ) and life insurance and legacy annuity products ( collectively referred to as 201clife operations 201d ) . property & casualty operations property & casualty operations holds fixed maturity securities including a significant short-term investment position ( securities with maturities of one year or less at the time of purchase ) to meet liquidity needs . as of december 31 , 2013 , property & casualty operations 2019 fixed maturities , short-term investments , and cash are summarized as follows: .
|fixed maturities|$ 24704|
|short-term investments|984|
|cash|189|
|less : derivative collateral|241|
|total|$ 25636|
.
Question: as of december 31 , 2013 , what was the percent of the total property & casualty operations 2019 from short-term investments
Answer: | 0.03838 |
FINQA2331 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 12 . borrowings short-term borrowings 2015 revolving credit facility . in march 2011 , the company entered into a five-year $ 3.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility , which was amended in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . in april 2015 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2020 and to increase the amount of the aggregate commitment to $ 4.0 billion ( the 201c2015 credit facility 201d ) . the 2015 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2015 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2015 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2015 . the 2015 credit facility provides back-up liquidity to fund ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2015 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2015 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 4.0 billion as amended in april 2015 . the cp program is currently supported by the 2015 credit facility . at december 31 , 2015 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding . long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices and foreign exchange rates at december 31 , 2015 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount and debt issuance costs carrying value fair value .
|( in millions )|maturityamount|unamortized discount and debt issuance costs|carrying value|fair value|
|6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017|$ 700|$ -1 ( 1 )|$ 699|$ 757|
|5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019|1000|-3 ( 3 )|997|1106|
|4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021|750|-5 ( 5 )|745|828|
|3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022|750|-6 ( 6 )|744|773|
|3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024|1000|-8 ( 8 )|992|1030|
|1.25% ( 1.25 % ) notes due 2025|760|-7 ( 7 )|753|729|
|total long-term borrowings|$ 4960|$ -30 ( 30 )|$ 4930|$ 5223|
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2014 had a carrying value of $ 4.922 billion and a fair value of $ 5.309 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2025 notes . in may 2015 , the company issued 20ac700 million of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) senior unsecured notes maturing on may 6 , 2025 ( the 201c2025 notes 201d ) . the notes are listed on the new york stock exchange . the net proceeds of the 2025 notes were used for general corporate purposes , including refinancing of outstanding indebtedness . interest of approximately $ 10 million per year based on current exchange rates is payable annually on may 6 of each year . the 2025 notes may be redeemed in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2025 notes . upon conversion to u.s . dollars the company designated the 20ac700 million debt offering as a net investment hedge to offset its currency exposure relating to its net investment in certain euro functional currency operations . a gain of $ 19 million , net of tax , was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 . no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during 2015 . 2024 notes . in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) . the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes . 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a .
Question: how much will the company pay in interest on the 2022 notes between 2012 and 2022 ? in millions $ .
Answer: | 262.5 |
FINQA2332 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2009 net revenue|$ 485.1|
|net wholesale revenue|27.7|
|volume/weather|27.2|
|rough production cost equalization|18.6|
|retail electric price|16.3|
|securitization transition charge|15.3|
|purchased power capacity|-44.3 ( 44.3 )|
|other|-5.7 ( 5.7 )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 540.2|
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the net revenue in 2010
Answer: | 0.11358 |
FINQA2333 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) asu no . 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years , and interim periods within those years , beginning after december 15 , 2011 , which is the company 2019s fiscal year 2013 . subsequently , in december 2011 , the fasb issued asu no . 2011-12 , deferral of the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income in accounting standards update no . 2011-05 ( asu no . 2011-12 ) , which defers only those changes in asu no . 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments but does not affect all other requirements in asu no . 2011-05 . the adoption of asu no . 2011-05 and asu no . 2011-12 will affect the presentation of comprehensive income but will not materially impact the company 2019s financial condition or results of operations . u . discontinued operations in november 2007 , the company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with certain subsidiaries of on semiconductor corporation to sell the company 2019s cpu voltage regulation and pc thermal monitoring business which consisted of core voltage regulator products for the central processing unit in computing and gaming applications and temperature sensors and fan-speed controllers for managing the temperature of the central processing unit . during fiscal 2008 , the company completed the sale of this business . in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 , proceeds of $ 1 million were released from escrow and $ 0.6 million net of tax was recorded as additional gain from the sale of discontinued operations . the company does not expect any additional proceeds from this sale . in september 2007 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its baseband chipset business to mediatek inc . the decision to sell the baseband chipset business was due to the company 2019s decision to focus its resources in areas where its signal processing expertise can provide unique capabilities and earn superior returns . during fiscal 2008 , the company completed the sale of its baseband chipset business for net cash proceeds of $ 269 million . the company made cash payments of $ 1.7 million during fiscal 2009 related to retention payments for employees who transferred to mediatek inc . and for the reimbursement of intellectual property license fees incurred by mediatek . during fiscal 2010 , the company received cash proceeds of $ 62 million as a result of the receipt of a refundable withholding tax and also recorded an additional gain on sale of $ 0.3 million , or $ 0.2 million net of tax , due to the settlement of certain items at less than the amounts accrued . in fiscal 2011 , additional proceeds of $ 10 million were released from escrow and $ 6.5 million net of tax was recorded as additional gain from the sale of discontinued operations . the company does not expect any additional proceeds from this sale . the following amounts related to the cpu voltage regulation and pc thermal monitoring and baseband chipset businesses have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations. .
||2012|2011|2010|
|gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes|$ 2014|$ 10000|$ 1316|
|provision for income taxes|2014|3500|457|
|gain on sale of discontinued operations net of tax|$ 2014|$ 6500|$ 859|
3 . stock-based compensation and shareholders 2019 equity equity compensation plans the company grants , or has granted , stock options and other stock and stock-based awards under the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) . the 2006 plan was approved by the company 2019s board of directors on january 23 , 2006 and was approved by shareholders on march 14 , 2006 and subsequently amended in march 2006 , june 2009 , september 2009 , december 2009 , december 2010 and june 2011 . the 2006 plan provides for the grant of up to 15 million shares of the company 2019s common stock , plus such number of additional shares that were subject to outstanding options under the company 2019s previous plans that are not issued because the applicable option award subsequently terminates or expires without being exercised . the 2006 plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to qualify under section 422 of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended , non-statutory stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , restricted stock units and other stock-based awards . employees , officers , directors , consultants and advisors of the company and its subsidiaries are eligible to be granted awards under the 2006 plan . no award may be made under the 2006 plan after march 13 , 2016 , but awards previously granted may extend beyond that date . the company will not grant further options under any previous plans . while the company may grant to employees options that become exercisable at different times or within different periods , the company has generally granted to employees options that vest over five years and become exercisable in annual installments of 20% ( 20 % ) on each of the first , second , third , fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant ; 33.3% ( 33.3 % ) on each of the third , fourth , and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant ; or in annual installments of 25% ( 25 % ) on each of the second , third , fourth .
Question: what is the effective income tax rate in 2011 based on the information about the gains on sales of discontinued operations?
Answer: | 0.035 |
FINQA2334 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: construction of cvn-79 john f . kennedy , construction of the u.s . coast guard 2019s fifth national security cutter ( unnamed ) , advance planning efforts for the cvn-72 uss abraham lincoln rcoh , and continued execution of the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh . 2010 2014the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , was approximately $ 3.6 billion . significant new awards during this period included $ 480 million for the construction of the u.s . coast guard 2019s fourth national security cutter hamilton , $ 480 million for design and long-lead material procurement activities for the cvn-79 john f . kennedy aircraft carrier , $ 377 million for cvn-78 gerald r . ford , $ 224 million for lha-7 ( unnamed ) , $ 184 million for lpd-26 john p . murtha , $ 114 million for ddg-114 ralph johnson and $ 62 million for long-lead material procurement activities for lpd-27 ( unnamed ) . liquidity and capital resources we endeavor to ensure the most efficient conversion of operating results into cash for deployment in operating our businesses and maximizing stockholder value . we use various financial measures to assist in capital deployment decision making , including net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow . we believe these measures are useful to investors in assessing our financial performance . the table below summarizes key components of cash flow provided by ( used in ) operating activities: .
|( $ in millions )|year ended december 31 2011|year ended december 31 2010|year ended december 31 2009|
|net earnings ( loss )|$ -94 ( 94 )|$ 135|$ 124|
|goodwill impairment|290|0|0|
|deferred income taxes|27|-19 ( 19 )|-98 ( 98 )|
|depreciation and amortization|190|183|186|
|stock-based compensation|42|0|0|
|retiree benefit funding less than ( in excess of ) expense|122|33|-28 ( 28 )|
|trade working capital decrease ( increase )|-49 ( 49 )|27|-272 ( 272 )|
|net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities|$ 528|$ 359|$ -88 ( 88 )|
cash flows we discuss below our major operating , investing and financing activities for each of the three years in the period ended december 31 , 2011 , as classified on our consolidated statements of cash flows . operating activities 2011 2014cash provided by operating activities was $ 528 million in 2011 compared with $ 359 million in 2010 . the increase of $ 169 million was due principally to increased earnings net of impairment charges and lower pension contributions , offset by an increase in trade working capital . net cash paid by northrop grumman on our behalf for u.s . federal income tax obligations was $ 53 million . we expect cash generated from operations for 2012 to be sufficient to service debt , meet contract obligations , and finance capital expenditures . although 2012 cash from operations is expected to be sufficient to service these obligations , we may from time to time borrow funds under our credit facility to accommodate timing differences in cash flows . 2010 2014net cash provided by operating activities was $ 359 million in 2010 compared with cash used of $ 88 million in 2009 . the change of $ 447 million was due principally to a decrease in discretionary pension contributions of $ 97 million , a decrease in trade working capital of $ 299 million , and a decrease in deferred income taxes of $ 79 million . in 2009 , trade working capital balances included the unfavorable impact of delayed customer billings associated with the negative performance adjustments on the lpd-22 through lpd-25 contract due to projected cost increases at completion . see note 7 : contract charges in item 8 . the change in deferred taxes was due principally to the timing of contract related deductions . u.s . federal income tax payments made by northrop grumman on our behalf were $ 89 million in 2010. .
Question: what was the percentage change of the net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities from 2009 to 2010
Answer: | 5.07955 |
FINQA2335 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .
|december 31|citigroup|s&p 500 index|s&p financial index|
|2005|104.38|104.83|106.30|
|2006|124.02|121.20|126.41|
|2007|70.36|127.85|103.47|
|2008|18.71|81.12|47.36|
|2009|9.26|102.15|55.27|
.
Question: what was the ratio of cumulative total return for citigroup compared to the s&p 500 index in 2007
Answer: | 0.55033 |
FINQA2336 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2018 proved reserves decreased by 168 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 84 mmboe including an increase of 108 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s . resource plays into the 5-year plan and an increase of 15 mmboe associated with wells to sales that were additions to the plan , partially offset by a decrease of 39 mmboe due to technical revisions across the business . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 102 mmboe primarily in the u.s . resource plays due to an increase of 69 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and an increase of 33 mmboe associated with wells to sales from unproved categories . 2022 production : decreased by 153 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 201 mmboe including 196 mmboe associated with the sale of our subsidiary in libya , 4 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in new mexico and michigan , and 1 mmboe associated with the sale of the sarsang block in kurdistan . 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma . 2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico . 2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions . 2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s . resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s . technical revisions . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma . 2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma . 2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2018 , 529 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 17 mmboe from december 31 , 2017 . the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2018 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|546|
|revisions of previous estimates|47|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|61|
|dispositions|-19 ( 19 )|
|transfers to proved developed|-106 ( 106 )|
|end of year|529|
.
Question: what was the net decrease in proved undeveloped reserves for 2018 : ( mmboe ) ?
Answer: | -17.0 |
FINQA2337 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
|company index|november 17 2011|december 31 2011|december 31 2012|december 31 2013|
|delphi automotive plc ( 1 )|$ 100.00|$ 100.98|$ 179.33|$ 285.81|
|s&p 500 ( 2 )|100.00|100.80|116.93|154.80|
|automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )|100.00|89.27|110.41|166.46|
dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 . in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .
Question: what was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the three years ended december 31 2013?\\n
Answer: | 1.8581 |
FINQA2338 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a valuation allowance totaling $ 45.4 million , $ 43.9 million and $ 40.4 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 year end , respectively , has been established for deferred income tax assets primarily related to certain subsidiary loss carryforwards that may not be realized . realization of the net deferred income tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration . although realization is not assured , management believes it is more- likely-than-not that the net deferred income tax assets will be realized . the amount of the net deferred income tax assets considered realizable , however , could change in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period fluctuate . the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for 2013 , 2012 and ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 .
|( amounts in millions )|2013|2012|2011|
|unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year|$ 6.8|$ 11.0|$ 11.1|
|gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods|1.5|0.7|0.5|
|gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods|-1.6 ( 1.6 )|-4.9 ( 4.9 )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|
|gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period|0.5|1.2|2.8|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-2.1 ( 2.1 )|2013|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|
|lapsing of statutes of limitations|-0.5 ( 0.5 )|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|-1.8 ( 1.8 )|
|unrecognized tax benefits at end of year|$ 4.6|$ 6.8|$ 11.0|
of the $ 4.6 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 11.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 year end , respectively , approximately $ 4.6 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 9.1 million , respectively , would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during 2013 and 2012 , the company reversed a net $ 0.6 million and $ 0.5 million , respectively , of interest and penalties to income associated with unrecognized tax benefits . as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 year end , the company has provided for $ 0.9 million , $ 1.6 million and $ 1.6 million , respectively , of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits . the unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest and penalties are included in 201cother long-term liabilities 201d on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the united states and in various state , local and foreign jurisdictions . it is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits may either be settled with taxing authorities or the statutes of limitations for such items may lapse within the next 12 months , causing snap-on 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by a range of zero to $ 1.1 million . over the next 12 months , snap-on anticipates taking certain tax positions on various tax returns for which the related tax benefit does not meet the recognition threshold . accordingly , snap-on 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits may increase by a range of zero to $ 0.8 million over the next 12 months for uncertain tax positions expected to be taken in future tax filings . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2008 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 556.0 million , $ 492.2 million and $ 416.4 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 year end , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . 2013 annual report 83 .
Question: what percent of unrecognized tax benefits as of 2012 would not impact the effective income tax rate if recognized?
Answer: | 0.39706 |
FINQA2339 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 32 : change in nonperforming assets .
|in millions|2014|2013|
|january 1|$ 3457|$ 3794|
|new nonperforming assets ( a )|2127|3343|
|charge-offs and valuation adjustments ( b )|-585 ( 585 )|-1002 ( 1002 )|
|principal activity including paydowns and payoffs|-1001 ( 1001 )|-1016 ( 1016 )|
|asset sales and transfers to loans held for sale|-570 ( 570 )|-492 ( 492 )|
|returned to performing status|-548 ( 548 )|-1170 ( 1170 )|
|december 31|$ 2880|$ 3457|
( a ) new nonperforming assets in the 2013 period include $ 560 million of loans added in the first quarter of 2013 due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance on practices for loans and lines of credit related to consumer lending . ( b ) charge-offs and valuation adjustments in the 2013 period include $ 134 million of charge-offs due to the alignment with interagency supervisory guidance discussed in footnote ( a ) above . the table above presents nonperforming asset activity during 2014 and 2013 , respectively . nonperforming assets decreased $ 577 million from $ 3.5 billion at december 31 , 2013 to $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2014 , as a result of improvements in both consumer and commercial lending . consumer lending nonperforming loans decreased $ 224 million , commercial real estate nonperforming loans declined $ 184 million and commercial nonperforming loans decreased $ 167 million . as of december 31 , 2014 , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of total nonperforming loans were secured by collateral which lessens reserve requirements and is expected to reduce credit losses in the event of default . as of december 31 , 2014 , commercial lending nonperforming loans were carried at approximately 65% ( 65 % ) of their unpaid principal balance , due to charge-offs recorded to date , before consideration of the alll . see note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information on these loans . purchased impaired loans are considered performing , even if contractually past due ( or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms ) , as we accrete interest income over the expected life of the loans . the accretable yield represents the excess of the expected cash flows on the loans at the measurement date over the carrying value . generally decreases , other than interest rate decreases for variable rate notes , in the net present value of expected cash flows of individual commercial or pooled purchased impaired loans would result in an impairment charge to the provision for credit losses in the period in which the change is deemed probable . generally increases in the net present value of expected cash flows of purchased impaired loans would first result in a recovery of previously recorded allowance for loan losses , to the extent applicable , and then an increase to accretable yield for the remaining life of the purchased impaired loans . total nonperforming loans and assets in the tables above are significantly lower than they would have been due to this accounting treatment for purchased impaired loans . this treatment also results in a lower ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans and a higher ratio of alll to nonperforming loans . see note 4 purchased loans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information on these loans . loan delinquencies we regularly monitor the level of loan delinquencies and believe these levels may be a key indicator of loan portfolio asset quality . measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan . loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent . loan delinquencies exclude loans held for sale and purchased impaired loans , but include government insured or guaranteed loans and loans accounted for under the fair value option . total early stage loan delinquencies ( accruing loans past due 30 to 89 days ) decreased from $ 1.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 to $ 0.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the reduction in both consumer and commercial lending early stage delinquencies resulted from improved credit quality . see note 1 accounting policies in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report for additional information regarding our nonperforming loan and nonaccrual policies . accruing loans past due 90 days or more are referred to as late stage delinquencies . these loans are not included in nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest because they are well secured by collateral , and/or are in the process of collection , are managed in homogenous portfolios with specified charge-off timeframes adhering to regulatory guidelines , or are certain government insured or guaranteed loans . these loans decreased $ .4 billion , or 26% ( 26 % ) , from $ 1.5 billion at december 31 , 2013 to $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2014 , mainly due to a decline in government insured residential real estate loans of $ .3 billion , the majority of which we took possession of and conveyed the real estate , or are in the process of conveyance and claim resolution . the following tables display the delinquency status of our loans at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 . additional information regarding accruing loans past due is included in note 3 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report . 74 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: by how much , in billions , did early stage loans decrease between dec 31 2013 and dec 31 2014?
Answer: | 0.2 |
FINQA2340 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii , item 8 20 . pension and other benefit plans adoption of sfas 158 in september 2006 , the financial accounting standards board issued sfas 158 ( employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ) . sfas 158 required schlumberger to recognize the funded status ( i.e. , the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation ) of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans ( collectively 201cpostretirement benefit plans 201d ) in its december 31 , 2006 consolidated balance sheet , with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax . the adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs which were previously netted against schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans 2019 funded status in the consolidated balance sheet pursuant to the provisions of sfas 87 ( employers 2019 accounting for pensions ) and sfas 106 ( employer 2019s accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions ) . these amounts will subsequently be recognized as net periodic postretirement cost consistent with schlumberger 2019s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts . the adoption of sfas 158 had no effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , or for any prior period , and it will not affect schlumberger 2019s operating results in future periods . additionally , sfas 158 did not have an effect on schlumberger 2019s consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , sfas 158 also required companies to measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end balance sheet . this provision of sfas 158 is not applicable as schlumberger already uses a measurement date of december 31 for its postretirement benefit plans . the incremental effect of applying sfas 158 on the consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2006 for all of schlumberger 2019s postretirement benefit plans is presented in the following table : ( stated in millions ) prior to application of sfas 158 sfas 158 adoption adjustments application of sfas 158 .
||prior to application of sfas 158|sfas 158 adoption adjustments|after application of sfas 158|
|deferred taxes ( current )|$ 191|$ -28 ( 28 )|$ 163|
|deferred taxes ( long-term )|$ 186|$ 227|$ 413|
|other assets|$ 416|$ -243 ( 243 )|$ 173|
|accounts payable and accrued liabilities|$ 3925|$ -77 ( 77 )|$ 3848|
|postretirement benefits|$ 713|$ 323|$ 1036|
|accumulated other comprehensive loss|$ -879 ( 879 )|$ -290 ( 290 )|$ -1169 ( 1169 )|
as a result of the adoption of sfas 158 , schlumberger 2019s total liabilities increased by approximately 2% ( 2 % ) and stockholders 2019 equity decreased by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . the impact on schlumberger 2019s total assets was insignificant . united states defined benefit pension plans schlumberger and its united states subsidiary sponsor several defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all employees hired prior to october 1 , 2004 . the benefits are based on years of service and compensation on a career-average pay basis . the funding policy with respect to qualified pension plans is to annually contribute amounts that are based upon a number of factors including the actuarial accrued liability , amounts that are deductible for income tax purposes , legal funding requirements and available cash flow . these contributions are intended to provide for benefits earned to date and those expected to be earned in the future. .
Question: by how much did sfas 158 adoption adjustments increase postretirement benefits?
Answer: | 0.45302 |
FINQA2341 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents item 2 . properties . the following table summarizes the facilities we lease as of december 31 , 2017 , including the location and size of each principal facility , and their designated use . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current and near-term needs , and will be able to locate additional facilities as needed . location approximate square feet operation expiration dates .
|location|approximate square feet|operation|leaseexpiration dates|
|san diego ca|1218000|r&d manufacturing warehouse distribution and administrative|2018 2013 2031|
|san francisco bay area ca|616000|r&d manufacturing warehouse and administrative|2018 2013 2025|
|singapore|395000|r&d manufacturing warehouse distribution and administrative|2018 2013 2025|
|cambridge united kingdom*|92000|r&d manufacturing and administrative|2020 2013 2024|
|eindhoven the netherlands|42000|distribution and administrative|2020|
|madison wi*|73000|r&d manufacturing warehouse distribution and administrative|2018 2013 2019|
|other*|78000|administrative|2018 2013 2022|
________________ *excludes approximately 309000 square feet for which the leases do not commence until 2018 and beyond . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business , including actions with respect to intellectual property , employment , and contractual matters . in connection with these matters , we assess , on a regular basis , the probability and range of possible loss based on the developments in these matters . a liability is recorded in the financial statements if it is believed to be probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable results could occur , assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events . we regularly review outstanding legal matters to determine the adequacy of the liabilities accrued and related disclosures . the amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates . each matter presents its own unique circumstances , and prior litigation does not necessarily provide a reliable basis on which to predict the outcome , or range of outcomes , in any individual proceeding . because of the uncertainties related to the occurrence , amount , and range of loss on any pending litigation or claim , we are currently unable to predict their ultimate outcome , and , with respect to any pending litigation or claim where no liability has been accrued , to make a meaningful estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome . in the event opposing litigants in outstanding litigations or claims ultimately succeed at trial and any subsequent appeals on their claims , any potential loss or charges in excess of any established accruals , individually or in the aggregate , could have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations , and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable , and potentially in future periods . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: as of december 312017 what was the ratio of square footage in san francisco bay area ca singapore
Answer: | 1.55949 |
FINQA2342 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date .
|principal|interest rate|maturity date|
|$ 500.0|1.450% ( 1.450 % )|april 1 2017|
|1150.0|2.000|april 1 2018|
|500.0|4.625|november 30 2019|
|1500.0|2.700|april 1 2020|
|300.0|3.375|november 30 2021|
|750.0|3.150|april 1 2022|
|2000.0|3.550|april 1 2025|
|500.0|4.250|august 15 2035|
|500.0|5.750|november 30 2039|
|1250.0|4.450|august 15 2045|
we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is the short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims as a percentage of the long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers?
Answer: | 0.35047 |
FINQA2343 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties at october 30 , 2016 is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|3745|1629|5374|
|leased|564|1103|1667|
|total|4309|2732|7041|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; tainan , taiwan ; and santa clara , california . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 280 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what percentage of company's properties are located in united states?
Answer: | 0.61199 |
FINQA2344 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: gain or loss on ownership change in map results from contributions to map of certain environmental capital expenditures and leased property acquisitions funded by marathon and ashland . in accordance with map 2019s limited liability company agreement , in certain instances , environmental capital expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 5.822 billion in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 6.040 billion in 2003 from 2002 . the increases are primarily in the rm&t segment and result from higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 105 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 97 million in 2003 from 2002 . the increase in 2004 was primarily due to increased stock-based compensation and higher costs associated with business transformation and outsourcing . our 2004 results were also impacted by start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea and the increased cost of complying with governmental regulations . the increase in 2003 was primarily due to increased employee benefit expenses ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . additionally , during 2003 , we recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . inventory market valuation reserve ( 2018 2018imv 2019 2019 ) is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . generally , we will establish an imv reserve when crude oil prices fall below $ 22 per barrel . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 25 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 . the decrease in 2004 is primarily due to an increase in interest income . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of a reduction in interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 9 million , $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 230 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 . map income was higher in 2004 compared to 2003 and in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . minority interest in loss of equatorial guinea lng holdings limited , which represents gepetrol 2019s 25 percent ownership interest , was $ 7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from gepetrol 2019s share of start-up costs associated with the lng project in equatorial guinea . provision for income taxes increased by $ 143 million in 2004 from 2003 and by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , primarily due to $ 388 million and $ 720 million increases in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 36.6 percent compared to 36.6 percent and 42.1 percent for 2003 and 2002 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , we recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: .
||2004|2003|2002|
|statutory tax rate|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|
|effects of foreign operations ( a )|1.3|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|5.6|
|state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects|1.6|2.2|3.9|
|other federal tax effects|-1.3 ( 1.3 )|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|-2.4 ( 2.4 )|
|effective tax rate|36.6% ( 36.6 % )|36.6% ( 36.6 % )|42.1% ( 42.1 % )|
( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in .
Question: what was the total included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains for 2004 , 2003 and 2002 in millions?
Answer: | 30.0 |
FINQA2345 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc . secured financings are collateralized by assets , primarily aircraft , engines , simulators , rotable aircraft parts , airport leasehold rights , route authorities and airport slots . at december 31 , 2015 , the company was operating 35 aircraft under capital leases . leases can generally be renewed at rates based on fair market value at the end of the lease term for a number of additional years . at december 31 , 2015 , the maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations are as follows ( in millions ) : .
|2016|$ 2266|
|2017|1598|
|2018|2134|
|2019|3378|
|2020|3587|
|2021 and thereafter|7844|
|total|$ 20807|
( a ) 2013 credit facilities on june 27 , 2013 , american and aag entered into a credit and guaranty agreement ( as amended , restated , amended and restated or otherwise modified , the 2013 credit agreement ) with deutsche bank ag new york branch , as administrative agent , and certain lenders that originally provided for a $ 1.9 billion term loan facility scheduled to mature on june 27 , 2019 ( the 2013 term loan facility ) and a $ 1.0 billion revolving credit facility scheduled to mature on june 27 , 2018 ( the 2013 revolving facility ) . the maturity of the term loan facility was subsequently extended to june 2020 and the revolving credit facility commitments were subsequently increased to $ 1.4 billion with an extended maturity date of october 10 , 2020 , all of which is further described below . on may 21 , 2015 , american amended and restated the 2013 credit agreement pursuant to which it refinanced the 2013 term loan facility ( the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility and , together with the 2013 revolving facility , the 2013 credit facilities ) to extend the maturity date to june 2020 and reduce the libor margin from 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) . in addition , american entered into certain amendments to reflect the ability for american to make future modifications to the collateral pledged , subject to certain restrictions . the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility is repayable in annual installments , with the first installment in an amount equal to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) of the principal amount commencing on june 27 , 2016 and installments thereafter , in an amount equal to 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) of the principal amount , with any unpaid balance due on the maturity date . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.9 billion of principal was outstanding under the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility . voluntary prepayments may be made by american at any time . on october 10 , 2014 , american and aag amended the 2013 credit agreement to extend the maturity date of the 2013 revolving facility to october 10 , 2019 and increased the commitments thereunder to an aggregate principal amount of $ 1.4 billion while reducing the letter of credit commitments thereunder to $ 300 million . on october 26 , 2015 , american , aag , us airways group and us airways amended the 2013 credit agreement to extend the maturity date of the 2013 revolving facility to october 10 , 2020 . the 2013 revolving facility provides that american may from time to time borrow , repay and reborrow loans thereunder and have letters of credit issued thereunder . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the 2013 revolving facility . the 2013 credit facilities bear interest at an index rate plus an applicable index margin or , at american 2019s option , libor ( subject to a floor of 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) , with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ) plus a libor margin of 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) with respect to the 2013 revolving facility and 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) with respect to the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan facility ; provided that american 2019s corporate credit rating is ba3 or higher from moody 2019s and bb- or higher from s&p , the applicable libor margin would be 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) for the $ 1.9 billion 2015 term loan .
Question: what is the percent of the lease expenses after 2021 as a part of the total amount
Answer: | 0.37699 |
FINQA2346 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 57management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations facility include covenants relating to net interest coverage and total debt-to-book capitalization ratios . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 3-year credit facility at december 31 , 2005 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2005 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .
|( in millions )|payments due by period ( 1 ) total|payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006|payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007|payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008|payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009|payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010|payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter|
|long-term debt obligations|$ 4033|$ 119|$ 1222|$ 200|$ 2|$ 529|$ 1961|
|lease obligations|1150|438|190|134|109|84|195|
|purchase obligations|992|418|28|3|2|2|539|
|total contractual obligations|$ 6175|$ 975|$ 1440|$ 337|$ 113|$ 615|$ 2695|
( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . as previously discussed , the decrease in the long- term debt obligations as compared to december 31 , 2004 , was due to the redemptions and repurchases of $ 1.0 billion principal amount of outstanding securities during 2005 . also , as previously discussed , the remaining $ 118 million of 7.6% ( 7.6 % ) notes due january 1 , 2007 were reclassified to current maturities of long-term debt . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2005 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 1.2 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 254 million in 2005 , $ 217 million in 2004 and $ 223 million in 2003 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 992 million . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' in 2003 , the company entered into outsourcing contracts for certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology related services . these contracts generally extend for 10 years and are expected to expire in 2013 . the total payments under these contracts are approximately $ 3 billion over 10 years ; however , these contracts can be terminated . termination would result in a penalty substantially less than the annual contract payments . the company would also be required to find another source for these services , including the possibility of performing them in-house . as is customary in bidding for and completing network infrastructure projects and pursuant to a practice the company has followed for many years , the company has a number of performance/bid bonds and standby letters of credit outstanding , primarily relating to projects of government and enterprise mobility solutions segment and the networks segment . these instruments normally have maturities of up to three years and are standard in the .
Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations are long-term debt obligations?
Answer: | 0.65312 |
FINQA2347 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign pre-tax earnings of $ 33.6 billion , $ 30.5 billion and $ 36.8 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s consolidated financial statements provide for any related tax liability on undistributed earnings that the company does not intend to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . substantially all of the company 2019s undistributed international earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested in operations outside the u.s . were generated by subsidiaries organized in ireland , which has a statutory tax rate of 12.5% ( 12.5 % ) . as of september 27 , 2014 , u.s . income taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $ 69.7 billion of such earnings . the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these temporary differences is estimated to be approximately $ 23.3 billion . as of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ) to income before provision for income taxes for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , is as follows ( dollars in millions ) : the company 2019s income taxes payable have been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock plan awards . for stock options , the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the tax effect of the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the exercise price . for rsus , the company receives an income tax benefit upon the award 2019s vesting equal to the tax effect of the underlying stock 2019s fair market value . the company had net excess tax benefits from equity awards of $ 706 million , $ 643 million and $ 1.4 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , which were reflected as increases to common stock . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 64 .
||2014|2013|2012|
|computed expected tax|$ 18719|$ 17554|$ 19517|
|state taxes net of federal effect|469|508|677|
|indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries|-4744 ( 4744 )|-4614 ( 4614 )|-5895 ( 5895 )|
|research and development credit net|-88 ( 88 )|-287 ( 287 )|-103 ( 103 )|
|domestic production activities deduction|-495 ( 495 )|-308 ( 308 )|-328 ( 328 )|
|other|112|265|162|
|provision for income taxes|$ 13973|$ 13118|$ 14030|
|effective tax rate|26.1% ( 26.1 % )|26.2% ( 26.2 % )|25.2% ( 25.2 % )|
.
Question: what is the average effective tax rate for the 3 years ended 2014?
Answer: | 25.83333 |
FINQA2348 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: decreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to backlog backlog decreased slightly in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower orders on f-16 and f-22 programs . backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 2015 net sales to be comparable or slightly behind 2014 due to a decline in f-16 deliveries as well as a decline in f-35 development activity , partially offset by an increase in production contracts . operating profit is also expected to decrease in the low single digit range , due primarily to contract mix , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in certain federal agencies 2019 information technology budgets and increased re-competition on existing contracts coupled with the fragmentation of large contracts into multiple smaller contracts that are awarded primarily on the basis of price . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2013|2012|
|net sales|$ 7788|$ 8367|$ 8846|
|operating profit|699|759|808|
|operating margins|9.0% ( 9.0 % )|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|
|backlog at year-end|$ 8700|$ 8300|$ 8700|
2014 compared to 2013 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 579 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , for 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of about $ 645 million for 2014 due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs , driven by reductions in direct warfighter support ( including jieddo and ptds ) and defense budgets tied to command and control programs ; and approximately $ 490 million for 2014 due to a decline in volume for various ongoing programs , which reflects lower funding levels and programs impacted by in-theater force reductions . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 550 million for 2014 due to the start-up of new programs , growth in recently awarded programs and integration of recently acquired companies. .
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit from 2013 to 2014 for is&gs?
Answer: | -0.07905 |
FINQA2349 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 .
|cash flowsmillions|2012|2011|2010|
|cash provided by operating activities|$ 6161|$ 5873|$ 4105|
|cash used in investing activities|-3633 ( 3633 )|-3119 ( 3119 )|-2488 ( 2488 )|
|cash used in financing activities|-2682 ( 2682 )|-2623 ( 2623 )|-2381 ( 2381 )|
|net change in cash and cashequivalents|$ -154 ( 154 )|$ 131|$ -764 ( 764 )|
operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .
Question: what would 2012 capital expenditures have been without the early buyout of locomotives , in millions?
Answer: | 3558.0 |
FINQA2350 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: reinvested for continued use in foreign operations . if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits . it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings . in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons . under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount . at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment . during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s . internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment . as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million . in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) . fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements . under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position . the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures . we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million . as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation . the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 . the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 . therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million . of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized . $ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us . under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement . the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|
|balance at january 1|$ 135.2|$ 95.7|
|increases related to prior periods|12.1|27.4|
|decreases related to prior periods|-32.0 ( 32.0 )|-5.5 ( 5.5 )|
|increases related to current period|15.8|21.9|
|decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities|-1.3 ( 1.3 )|-1.3 ( 1.3 )|
|decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations|-0.3 ( 0.3 )|-3.0 ( 3.0 )|
|balance at december 31|$ 129.5|$ 135.2|
we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods . as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 . of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position . the u.s . federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward . the u.s . federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs . on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report . we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues . although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute . state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return . the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states . we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation . it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the change in unrecognized tax benefits between 2007 and 2008 in millions?
Answer: | -5.7 |
FINQA2351 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .
|2003 first quarter|high $ 4.04|low $ 2.72|2002 first quarter|high $ 17.84|low $ 4.11|
|second quarter|8.37|3.75|second quarter|9.17|3.55|
|third quarter|7.70|5.91|third quarter|4.61|1.56|
|fourth quarter|9.50|7.57|fourth quarter|3.57|0.95|
holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .
Question: what was the difference in the low price for the first quarter of 2003 and the high price for the fourth quarter of 2002?
Answer: | -0.54 |
FINQA2352 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases .
|fiscal years|operating leases|
|2012|$ 17590|
|2013|12724|
|2014|6951|
|2015|5649|
|2016|3669|
|later years|19472|
|total|$ 66055|
12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the growth rate in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees in 2011?
Answer: | 0.06829 |
FINQA2353 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .
||( in millions )|
|2002 net revenue|$ 1130.7|
|volume/weather|17.8|
|fuel write-offs in 2002|15.3|
|net wholesale revenue|10.2|
|base rate decreases|-23.3 ( 23.3 )|
|nisco gain recognized in 2002|-15.2 ( 15.2 )|
|rate refund provisions|-11.3 ( 11.3 )|
|other|-14.1 ( 14.1 )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 1110.1|
the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy gulf states , inc.?
Answer: | -0.01822 |
FINQA2354 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consume significant amounts of energy , and we may in the future incur additional or increased capital , operating and other expenditures from changes due to new or increased climate-related and other environmental regulations . we could also incur substantial liabilities , including fines or sanctions , enforcement actions , natural resource damages claims , cleanup and closure costs , and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury under environmental and common laws . the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977 and local anti-bribery laws , including those in brazil , china , mexico , india and the united kingdom ( where we maintain operations directly or through a joint venture ) , prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of influencing official decisions . our internal control policies and procedures , or those of our vendors , may not adequately protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed or alleged to have been committed by our employees , agents or vendors . any such violations could lead to civil or criminal monetary and non-monetary penalties and/or could damage our reputation . we are subject to a number of labor and employment laws and regulations that could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our operational flexibility . additionally , changing privacy laws in the united states ( including the california consumer privacy act , which will become effective in january 2020 ) , europe ( where the general data protection regulation became effective in 2018 ) and elsewhere have created new individual privacy rights , imposed increased obligations on companies handling personal data and increased potential exposure to fines and penalties . item 1b . unresolved staff comments there are no unresolved sec staff comments . item 2 . properties we operate locations in north america , including the majority of u.s . states , south america , europe , asia and australia . we lease our principal offices in atlanta , ga . we believe that our existing production capacity is adequate to serve existing demand for our products and consider our plants and equipment to be in good condition . our corporate and operating facilities as of september 30 , 2019 are summarized below: .
|segment|number of facilities owned|number of facilities leased|number of facilities total|
|corrugated packaging|112|61|173|
|consumer packaging|84|55|139|
|corporate and significant regional offices|2014|10|10|
|total|196|126|322|
the tables that follow show our annual production capacity by mill at september 30 , 2019 in thousands of tons , except for the north charleston , sc mill which reflects our capacity after the previously announced machine closure expected to occur in fiscal 2020 . our mill system production levels and operating rates may vary from year to year due to changes in market and other factors , including the impact of hurricanes and other weather-related events . our simple average mill system operating rates for the last three years averaged 94% ( 94 % ) . we own all of our mills. .
Question: what was the ratio of the corrugated packaging number of facilities owned to those leased
Answer: | 1.83607 |
FINQA2355 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense related to capital lease obligations was $ 1.7 million during both the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , and $ 1.5 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . purchase commitments in the table below , we set forth our enforceable and legally binding purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2013 . some of the amounts included in the table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties , and other factors . because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective , our actual payments may vary from those reflected in the table . purchase orders made in the ordinary course of business are excluded from the table below . any amounts for which we are liable under purchase orders are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities . these obligations relate to various purchase agreements for items such as minimum amounts of fiber and energy purchases over periods ranging from one to 15 years . total purchase commitments are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : .
|2014|$ 120971|
|2015|54757|
|2016|14840|
|2017|3017|
|2018|2545|
|thereafter|11536|
|total|$ 207666|
the company purchased a total of $ 61.7 million , $ 27.7 million , and $ 28.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , under these purchase agreements . the increase in purchase commitments in 2014 , compared with 2013 , relates to the acquisition of boise in fourth quarter 2013 . environmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies . from 1994 through 2013 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million . at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 34.1 million of environmental-related reserves recorded on its consolidated balance sheet . of the $ 34.1 million , approximately $ 26.5 million related to environmental- related asset retirement obligations discussed in note 14 , asset retirement obligations , and $ 7.6 million related to our estimate of other environmental contingencies . the company recorded $ 7.8 million in 201caccrued liabilities 201d and $ 26.3 million in 201cother long-term liabilities 201d on the consolidated balance sheet . liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions . because of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change . as of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures for remediation costs and asset retirement obligations above the $ 34.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2013 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows . guarantees and indemnifications we provide guarantees , indemnifications , and other assurances to third parties in the normal course of our business . these include tort indemnifications , environmental assurances , and representations and warranties in commercial agreements . at december 31 , 2013 , we are not aware of any material liabilities arising from any guarantee , indemnification , or financial assurance we have provided . if we determined such a liability was probable and subject to reasonable determination , we would accrue for it at that time. .
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?
Answer: | 0.07146 |
FINQA2356 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions .
|years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )|2015|2014|2013|
|revenue|$ 7426|$ 7834|$ 7789|
|operating income|1506|1648|1540|
|operating margin|20.3% ( 20.3 % )|21.0% ( 21.0 % )|19.8% ( 19.8 % )|
the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the net income margin for 2015?
Answer: | 0.18853 |
FINQA2357 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: condition are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: .
||2018|2017|2016|
|expected volatility|17.23% ( 17.23 % )|17.40% ( 17.40 % )|15.90% ( 15.90 % )|
|risk-free interest rate|2.36% ( 2.36 % )|1.53% ( 1.53 % )|0.91% ( 0.91 % )|
|expected life ( years )|3.0|3.0|3.0|
|grant date fair value per share|$ 73.62|$ 72.81|$ 77.16|
the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount . prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period . on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: what was the minimum grant date fair value per share in the table?
Answer: | 72.81 |
FINQA2358 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 2 ) our union-represented mainline employees are covered by agreements that are not currently amendable . joint collective bargaining agreements ( jcbas ) have been reached with post-merger employee groups , except the maintenance , fleet service , stock clerks , maintenance control technicians and maintenance training instructors represented by the twu-iam association who are covered by separate cbas that become amendable in the third quarter of 2018 . until those agreements become amendable , negotiations for jcbas will be conducted outside the traditional rla bargaining process as described above , and , in the meantime , no self-help will be permissible . ( 3 ) among our wholly-owned regional subsidiaries , the psa mechanics and flight attendants have agreements that are now amendable and are engaged in traditional rla negotiations . the envoy passenger service employees are engaged in traditional rla negotiations for an initial cba . the piedmont fleet and passenger service employees have reached a tentative five-year agreement which is subject to membership ratification . for more discussion , see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cunion disputes , employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations . 201d aircraft fuel our operations and financial results are significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel , which is our second largest expense . based on our 2018 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2018 annual fuel expense by $ 45 million . the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline and regional operations for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total operating expenses .
|year|gallons|average priceper gallon|aircraft fuelexpense|percent of totaloperating expenses|
|2017|4352|$ 1.73|$ 7510|19.7% ( 19.7 % )|
|2016|4347|1.42|6180|17.7% ( 17.7 % )|
|2015|4323|1.72|7456|21.4% ( 21.4 % )|
as of december 31 , 2017 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters ( including hurricanes or similar events in the u.s . southeast and on the gulf coast where a significant portion of domestic refining capacity is located ) , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , distribution challenges , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is very dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices or significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d seasonality and other factors due to the greater demand for air travel during the summer months , revenues in the airline industry in the second and third quarters of the year tend to be greater than revenues in the first and fourth quarters of the year . general economic conditions , fears of terrorism or war , fare initiatives , fluctuations in fuel prices , labor actions , weather , natural disasters , outbreaks of disease and other factors could impact this seasonal pattern . therefore , our quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year , and historical operating results in a quarterly or annual period are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. .
Question: what are the total operating expenses based on the aircraft fuel expense in 2017?
Answer: | 38121.82741 |
FINQA2359 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , due to ineffectiveness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness , was not significant . for contracts outstanding at december 31 , 2008 , we have an obligation to purchase u.s . dollars and sell euros , japanese yen , british pounds , canadian dollars , australian dollars and korean won and purchase swiss francs and sell u.s . dollars at set maturity dates ranging from january 2009 through june 2011 . the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts entered into with third parties to purchase u.s . dollars at december 31 , 2008 were $ 1343.0 million . the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts entered into with third parties to purchase swiss francs at december 31 , 2008 were $ 207.5 million . the fair value of outstanding derivative instruments recorded on the balance sheet at december 31 , 2008 , together with settled derivatives where the hedged item has not yet affected earnings , was a net unrealized gain of $ 32.7 million , or $ 33.0 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other comprehensive income , of which $ 16.4 million , or $ 17.9 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months . we also enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity 2019s functional currency . as a result , any foreign currency remeasurement gains/losses recognized in earnings under sfas no . 52 , 201cforeign currency translation , 201d are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period . other comprehensive income 2013 other comprehensive income refers to revenues , expenses , gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized foreign currency hedge gains and losses , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . in 2006 we adopted sfas 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans 2013 an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this statement required recognition of the funded status of our benefit plans in the statement of financial position and recognition of certain deferred gains or losses in other comprehensive income . we recorded an unrealized loss of $ 35.4 million in other comprehensive income during 2006 related to the adoption of sfas 158 . the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows ( in millions ) : balance at december 31 , comprehensive income ( loss ) balance at december 31 .
||balance at december 31 2007|other comprehensive income ( loss )|balance at december 31 2008|
|foreign currency translation|$ 368.8|$ -49.4 ( 49.4 )|$ 319.4|
|foreign currency hedges|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|78.4|33.0|
|unrealized gain/ ( loss ) on securities|-1.9 ( 1.9 )|0.6|-1.3 ( 1.3 )|
|unrecognized prior service cost and unrecognized gain/ ( loss ) in actuarial assumptions|-31.2 ( 31.2 )|-79.9 ( 79.9 )|-111.1 ( 111.1 )|
|accumulated other comprehensive income|$ 290.3|$ -50.3 ( 50.3 )|$ 240.0|
during 2008 , we reclassified an investment previously accounted for under the equity method to an available-for-sale investment as we no longer exercised significant influence over the third-party investee . the investment was marked-to- market in accordance with sfas 115 , 201caccounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities , 201d resulting in a net unrealized gain of $ 23.8 million recorded in other comprehensive income for 2008 . this unrealized gain was reclassified to the income statement when we sold this investment in 2008 for total proceeds of $ 54.9 million and a gross realized gain of $ 38.8 million included in interest and other income . the basis of these securities was determined based on the consideration paid at the time of acquisition . treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of shareholders equity . we may reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . accounting pronouncements 2013 in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements , 201d which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this statement does not require any new fair value measurements , but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information . sfas no . 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . in february 2008 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( fsp ) no . sfas 157-2 , which delays the effective date of certain provisions of sfas no . 157 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the full adoption of sfas no . 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 046000000 ***%%pcmsg|46 |00009|yes|no|02/24/2009 19:24|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what would the unrealized gain/ ( loss ) on securities in millions have been in 2008 without the reclassification of an investment previously accounted for under the equity method to an available-for-sale investment?
Answer: | -25.1 |
FINQA2360 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: .
|option expiration date|2009|
|option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :||
|put options purchased|20000|
|call options sold|15000|
|average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :||
|put options|$ 50.50|
|call options|$ 90.50|
in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .
Question: using the above listed average exercise price , what were the value of the put options purchased?
Answer: | 1010000.0 |
FINQA2361 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls . we do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud . a control system , no matter how well-designed and operated , can provide only reasonable , not absolute , assurance that the control system 2019s objectives will be met . the design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource constraints exist , and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs . further , because of the inherent limitations in all control systems , no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , have been detected . the design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events , and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions . projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks . over time , controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures . if our controls become inadequate , we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations , our reputation may be adversely affected , our business and operating results could be harmed , and the market price of our stock could decline . item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.5 19.2 50.7 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 7.1 9.6 .
|( square feet in millions )|unitedstates|othercountries|total|
|owned facilities1|31.5|19.2|50.7|
|leased facilities2|2.5|7.1|9.6|
|total facilities|34.0|26.3|60.3|
1 leases and municipal grants on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2109 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2058 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and the majority of our wafer manufacturing activities in 2016 were also located in the u.s . one of our arizona wafer fabrication facilities is currently on hold and held in a safe state , and we are reserving the building for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facility for its intended use . for more information on our wafer fabrication and our assembly and test facilities , see 201cmanufacturing and assembly and test 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 4 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 20 : commitments and contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the ratio of the owned facilities square feet in the united states to the other countries
Answer: | 1.64062 |
FINQA2362 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 58 2016 annual report note 12 . business acquisition bayside business solutions , inc . effective july 1 , 2015 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of bayside business solutions , an alabama-based company that provides technology solutions and payment processing services primarily for the financial services industry , for $ 10000 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of bayside business solutions expanded the company 2019s presence in commercial lending within the industry . management has completed a purchase price allocation of bayside business solutions and its assessment of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities assumed . the recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed , based upon their fair values as of july 1 , 2015 are set forth below: .
|current assets|$ 1922|
|long-term assets|253|
|identifiable intangible assets|5005|
|total liabilities assumed|-3279 ( 3279 )|
|total identifiable net assets|3901|
|goodwill|6099|
|net assets acquired|$ 10000|
the goodwill of $ 6099 arising from this acquisition consists largely of the growth potential , synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the company with those of bayside business solutions , together with the value of bayside business solutions 2019 assembled workforce . goodwill from this acquisition has been allocated to our banking systems and services segment . the goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . identifiable intangible assets from this acquisition consist of customer relationships of $ 3402 , $ 659 of computer software and other intangible assets of $ 944 . the weighted average amortization period for acquired customer relationships , acquired computer software , and other intangible assets is 15 years , 5 years , and 20 years , respectively . current assets were inclusive of cash acquired of $ 1725 . the fair value of current assets acquired included accounts receivable of $ 178 . the gross amount of receivables was $ 178 , none of which was expected to be uncollectible . during fiscal year 2016 , the company incurred $ 55 in costs related to the acquisition of bayside business solutions . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of bayside business solutions 2019 operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income for the twelve months ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 4273 and after-tax net income of $ 303 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided . banno , llc effective march 1 , 2014 , the company acquired all of the equity interests of banno , an iowa-based company that provides web and transaction marketing services with a focus on the mobile medium , for $ 27910 paid in cash . this acquisition was funded using existing operating cash . the acquisition of banno expanded the company 2019s presence in online and mobile technologies within the industry . during fiscal year 2014 , the company incurred $ 30 in costs related to the acquisition of banno . these costs included fees for legal , valuation and other fees . these costs were included within general and administrative expenses . the results of banno's operations included in the company's consolidated statements of income for the year ended june 30 , 2016 included revenue of $ 6393 and after-tax net loss of $ 1289 . for the year ended june 30 , 2015 , our consolidated statements of income included revenue of $ 4175 and after-tax net loss of $ 1784 attributable to banno . the results of banno 2019s operations included in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date to june 30 , 2014 included revenue of $ 848 and after-tax net loss of $ 1121 . the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the twelve month period ended june 30 , 2016 do not include any revenues and expenses related to this acquisition prior to the acquisition date . the impact of this acquisition was considered immaterial to both the current and prior periods of our consolidated financial statements and pro forma financial information has not been provided. .
Question: what was the average revenue generated by banno between 2014 and 2016?
Answer: | 11416.0 |
FINQA2363 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .
|company/index|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2014|december 31 , 2015|december 31 , 2016|december 31 , 2017|december 31 , 2018|
|o 2019reilly automotive inc .|$ 100|$ 150|$ 197|$ 216|$ 187|$ 268|
|s&p 500 retail index|100|110|137|143|184|208|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 111|$ 111|$ 121|$ 145|$ 136|
.
Question: what is the roi of an investment in o 2019reilly automotive inc . from 2013 to 2017?
Answer: | 0.87 |
FINQA2364 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
||( in millions )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 998.7|
|deferred fuel cost revisions|-16.9 ( 16.9 )|
|other|-3.4 ( 3.4 )|
|2004 net revenue|$ 978.4|
deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .
Question: what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of the decrease in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: | 0.5665 |
FINQA2365 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 214 million , $ 139 million after tax ( $ 0.31 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . ( f ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 .
|( in millions )|2006|2005|2004|2003|2002|
|net earnings|$ 2529|$ 1825|$ 1266|$ 1053|$ 500|
|interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1|235|241|276|317|378|
|return|$ 2764|$ 2066|$ 1542|$ 1370|$ 878|
|average debt2 5|$ 4727|$ 5077|$ 5932|$ 6612|$ 7491|
|average equity3 5|7686|7590|7015|6170|6853|
|average benefit plan adjustments3 45|2006|1545|1296|1504|341|
|average invested capital|$ 14419|$ 14212|$ 14243|$ 14286|$ 14685|
|return on invested capital|19.2% ( 19.2 % )|14.5% ( 14.5 % )|10.8% ( 10.8 % )|9.6% ( 9.6 % )|6.0% ( 6.0 % )|
1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability in all years and the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; and 2002 = ( $ 1537 ) million . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .
Question: what was the average return on invested capital from 2002 to 2006?
Answer: | 0.1202 |
FINQA2366 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : .
||2019|2020|2021|2022|2023|2024 2013 2028|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 2350|$ 2390|$ 2470|$ 2550|$ 2610|$ 13670|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|170|180|180|180|170|810|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.07341 |
FINQA2367 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 153 : net outstanding standby letters of credit dollars in billions december 31 december 31 .
|dollars in billions|december 31 2012|december 312011|
|net outstanding standby letters of credit|$ 11.5|$ 10.8|
|internal credit ratings ( as a percentage of portfolio ) :|||
|pass ( a )|95% ( 95 % )|94% ( 94 % )|
|below pass ( b )|5% ( 5 % )|6% ( 6 % )|
( a ) indicates that expected risk of loss is currently low . ( b ) indicates a higher degree of risk of default . if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon the request of the guaranteed party , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them . the standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances outstanding on december 31 , 2012 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 7 years . the aggregate maximum amount of future payments pnc could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances was $ 14.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 , of which $ 7.5 billion support remarketing programs . as of december 31 , 2012 , assets of $ 1.8 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit . recourse provisions from third parties of $ 3.2 billion were also available for this purpose as of december 31 , 2012 . in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit and letter of credit risk participations issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us . the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances was $ 247 million at december 31 , 2012 . standby bond purchase agreements and other liquidity facilities we enter into standby bond purchase agreements to support municipal bond obligations . at december 31 , 2012 , the aggregate of our commitments under these facilities was $ 587 million . we also enter into certain other liquidity facilities to support individual pools of receivables acquired by commercial paper conduits . at december 31 , 2012 , our total commitments under these facilities were $ 145 million . indemnifications we are a party to numerous acquisition or divestiture agreements under which we have purchased or sold , or agreed to purchase or sell , various types of assets . these agreements can cover the purchase or sale of : 2022 entire businesses , 2022 loan portfolios , 2022 branch banks , 2022 partial interests in companies , or 2022 other types of assets . these agreements generally include indemnification provisions under which we indemnify the third parties to these agreements against a variety of risks to the indemnified parties as a result of the transaction in question . when pnc is the seller , the indemnification provisions will generally also provide the buyer with protection relating to the quality of the assets we are selling and the extent of any liabilities being assumed by the buyer . due to the nature of these indemnification provisions , we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them . we provide indemnification in connection with securities offering transactions in which we are involved . when we are the issuer of the securities , we provide indemnification to the underwriters or placement agents analogous to the indemnification provided to the purchasers of businesses from us , as described above . when we are an underwriter or placement agent , we provide a limited indemnification to the issuer related to our actions in connection with the offering and , if there are other underwriters , indemnification to the other underwriters intended to result in an appropriate sharing of the risk of participating in the offering . due to the nature of these indemnification provisions , we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them . in the ordinary course of business , we enter into certain types of agreements that include provisions for indemnifying third parties . we also enter into certain types of agreements , including leases , assignments of leases , and subleases , in which we agree to indemnify third parties for acts by our agents , assignees and/or sublessees , and employees . we also enter into contracts for the delivery of technology service in which we indemnify the other party against claims of patent and copyright infringement by third parties . due to the nature of these indemnification provisions , we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under them . in the ordinary course of business , we enter into contracts with third parties under which the third parties provide services on behalf of pnc . in many of these contracts , we agree to indemnify the third party service provider under certain circumstances . the terms of the indemnity vary from contract to contract and the amount of the indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined . we are a general or limited partner in certain asset management and investment limited partnerships , many of which contain indemnification provisions that would require us to make payments in excess of our remaining unfunded commitments . while in certain of these partnerships the maximum liability to us is limited to the sum of our unfunded commitments and partnership distributions received by us , in the others the indemnification liability is unlimited . as a result , we cannot determine our aggregate potential exposure for these indemnifications . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 227 .
Question: what percentage of the aggregate maximum amount of future payments pnc could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances was attributable to support remarketing programs?
Answer: | 0.5102 |
FINQA2368 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 26 | 2009 annual report in fiscal 2008 , revenues in the credit union systems and services business segment increased 14% ( 14 % ) from fiscal 2007 . all revenue components within the segment experienced growth during fiscal 2008 . license revenue generated the largest dollar growth in revenue as episys ae , our flagship core processing system aimed at larger credit unions , experienced strong sales throughout the year . support and service revenue , which is the largest component of total revenues for the credit union segment , experienced 34 percent growth in eft support and 10 percent growth in in-house support . gross profit in this business segment increased $ 9344 in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 , due primarily to the increase in license revenue , which carries the highest margins . liquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents increased to $ 118251 at june 30 , 2009 from $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : 2009 2008 2007 .
|2008|year ended june 30 2009 2008|year ended june 30 2009 2008|year ended june 30 2009|
|net income|$ 103102|$ 104222|$ 104681|
|non-cash expenses|74397|70420|56348|
|change in receivables|21214|-2913 ( 2913 )|-28853 ( 28853 )|
|change in deferred revenue|21943|5100|24576|
|change in other assets and liabilities|-14068 ( 14068 )|4172|17495|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 206588|$ 181001|$ 174247|
year ended june 30 , cash provided by operations increased $ 25587 to $ 206588 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2009 as compared to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 . this increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in receivables compared to the same period a year ago of $ 21214 . this decrease is largely the result of fiscal 2010 annual software maintenance billings being provided to customers earlier than in the prior year , which allowed more cash to be collected before the end of the fiscal year than in previous years . further , we collected more cash overall related to revenues that will be recognized in subsequent periods in the current year than in fiscal 2008 . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2009 was $ 59227 and includes $ 3027 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . capital expenditures for fiscal 2009 were $ 31562 compared to $ 31105 for fiscal 2008 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2009 was $ 24684 compared to $ 23736 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 94675 and includes the repurchase of 3106 shares of our common stock for $ 58405 , the payment of dividends of $ 26903 and $ 13489 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 3773 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock ( through the employee stock purchase plan ) and $ 348 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2008 , net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . beginning during fiscal 2008 , us financial markets and many of the largest us financial institutions have been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . since that time , these and other such developments have resulted in a broad , global economic downturn . while we , as is the case with most companies , have experienced the effects of this downturn , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collection efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity will be minimized by cash generated by recurring sources of revenue and due to our access to available lines of credit. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the net cash from operating activities from 2008 to 2009
Answer: | 0.14136 |
FINQA2369 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31838 route miles . we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 . 2013 2012 .
||2013|2012|
|route|31838|31868|
|other main line|6766|6715|
|passing lines and turnouts|3167|3124|
|switching and classification yard lines|9090|9046|
|total miles|50861|50753|
headquarters building we maintain our headquarters in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees and is subject to a financing arrangement . harriman dispatching center the harriman dispatching center ( hdc ) , located in omaha , nebraska , is our primary dispatching facility . it is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our .
Question: what is the percent of the owned and operated of the rail network route miles
Answer: | 0.81692 |
FINQA2370 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we cannot assure you that the gener restructuring will be completed or that the terms thereof will not be changed materially . in addition , gener is in the process of restructuring the debt of its subsidiaries , termoandes s.a . ( 2018 2018termoandes 2019 2019 ) and interandes , s.a . ( 2018 2018interandes 2019 2019 ) , and expects that the maturities of these obligations will be extended . under-performing businesses during 2003 we sold or discontinued under-performing businesses and construction projects that did not meet our investment criteria or did not provide reasonable opportunities to restructure . it is anticipated that there will be less ongoing activity related to write-offs of development or construction projects and impairment charges in the future . the businesses , which were affected in 2003 , are listed below . impairment project name project type date location ( in millions ) .
|project name|project type|date|location|impairment ( in millions )|
|ede este ( 1 )|operating|december 2003|dominican republic|$ 60|
|wolf hollow|operating|december 2003|united states|$ 120|
|granite ridge|operating|december 2003|united states|$ 201|
|colombia i|operating|november 2003|colombia|$ 19|
|zeg|construction|december 2003|poland|$ 23|
|bujagali|construction|august 2003|uganda|$ 76|
|el faro|construction|april 2003|honduras|$ 20|
( 1 ) see note 4 2014discontinued operations . improving credit quality our de-leveraging efforts reduced parent level debt by $ 1.2 billion in 2003 ( including the secured equity-linked loan previously issued by aes new york funding l.l.c. ) . we refinanced and paid down near-term maturities by $ 3.5 billion and enhanced our year-end liquidity to over $ 1 billion . our average debt maturity was extended from 2009 to 2012 . at the subsidiary level we continue to pursue limited recourse financing to reduce parent credit risk . these factors resulted in an overall reduced cost of capital , improved credit statistics and expanded access to credit at both aes and our subsidiaries . liquidity at the aes parent level is an important factor for the rating agencies in determining whether the company 2019s credit quality should improve . currency and political risk tend to be biggest variables to sustaining predictable cash flow . the nature of our large contractual and concession-based cash flow from these businesses serves to mitigate these variables . in 2003 , over 81% ( 81 % ) of cash distributions to the parent company were from u.s . large utilities and worldwide contract generation . on february 4 , 2004 , we called for redemption of $ 155049000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , which represents the entire outstanding principal amount of the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 , and $ 34174000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 . the 8% ( 8 % ) senior notes due 2008 and the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 were redeemed on march 8 , 2004 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date . the mandatory redemption of the 10% ( 10 % ) secured senior notes due 2005 was being made with a portion of our 2018 2018adjusted free cash flow 2019 2019 ( as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued ) for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2003 as required by the indenture and was made on a pro rata basis . on february 13 , 2004 we issued $ 500 million of unsecured senior notes . the unsecured senior notes mature on march 1 , 2014 and are callable at our option at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the unsecured senior notes plus a make-whole premium . the unsecured senior notes were issued at a price of 98.288% ( 98.288 % ) and pay interest semi-annually at an annual .
Question: what was the total in millions of impairment projects in the united states in 2003?
Answer: | 321.0 |
FINQA2371 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 73 of 98 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 15 . shareholders 2019 equity at december 31 , 2006 , the company had 550 million shares of common stock and 15 million shares of preferred stock authorized , both without par value . preferred stock includes 120000 authorized but unissued shares designated as series a junior participating preferred stock . under the company 2019s shareholder rights agreement dated july 26 , 2006 , one preferred stock purchase right ( right ) is attached to each outstanding share of ball corporation common stock . subject to adjustment , each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the company one one-thousandth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $ 185 per right . if a person or group acquires 10 percent or more of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( or upon occurrence of certain other events ) , the rights ( other than those held by the acquiring person ) become exercisable and generally entitle the holder to purchase shares of ball corporation common stock at a 50 percent discount . the rights , which expire in 2016 , are redeemable by the company at a redemption price of $ 0.001 per right and trade with the common stock . exercise of such rights would cause substantial dilution to a person or group attempting to acquire control of the company without the approval of ball 2019s board of directors . the rights would not interfere with any merger or other business combinations approved by the board of directors . the company reduced its share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in connection with the employee stock purchase plan , the company contributes 20 percent of up to $ 500 of each participating employee 2019s monthly payroll deduction toward the purchase of ball corporation common stock . company contributions for this plan were $ 3.2 million in 2006 , $ 3.2 million in 2005 and $ 2.7 million in 2004 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) .
|( $ in millions )|foreign currency translation|pension and other postretirement items net of tax|effective financial derivatives net of tax|accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )|
|december 31 2003|$ 80.7|$ -93.1 ( 93.1 )|$ 11.0|$ -1.4 ( 1.4 )|
|2004 change|68.2|-33.2 ( 33.2 )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|34.6|
|december 31 2004|148.9|-126.3 ( 126.3 )|10.6|33.2|
|2005 change|-74.3 ( 74.3 )|-43.6 ( 43.6 )|-16.0 ( 16.0 )|-133.9 ( 133.9 )|
|december 31 2005|74.6|-169.9 ( 169.9 )|-5.4 ( 5.4 )|-100.7 ( 100.7 )|
|2006 change|57.2|8.0|6.0|71.2|
|december 31 2006|$ 131.8|$ -161.9 ( 161.9 )|$ 0.6|$ -29.5 ( 29.5 )|
notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the minimum pension liability is presented net of related tax expense of $ 2.9 million for 2006 and related tax benefits of $ 27.3 million and $ 20.8 million for 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 , related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 and related tax benefit of $ 0.2 million for 2004. .
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2003 and 2004?\\n
Answer: | 24.71429 |
FINQA2372 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: l iquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company's cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 from $ 88617 at june 30 , 2007 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . this increase is primarily attributable to an increase in expenses that do not have a corresponding cash outflow , such as depreciation and amortization , as a percentage of total net income . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . during fiscal 2007 , payments for acquisitions totaled $ 34006 , plus $ 5301 paid on earn-outs and other acquisition adjustments . capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 were $ 31105 compared to $ 34202 for fiscal 2007 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 was $ 23736 compared to $ 20743 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2007 , net cash used in financing activities included the repurchase of our common stock for $ 98413 and the payment of dividends of $ 21685 . as in the current year , cash used in fiscal 2007 was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock of $ 29212 , $ 4640 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises and $ 19388 net borrowings on revolving credit facilities . at june 30 , 2008 , the company had negative working capital of $ 11418 ; however , the largest component of current liabilities was deferred revenue of $ 212375 . the cash outlay necessary to provide the services related to these deferred revenues is significantly less than this recorded balance . therefore , we do not anticipate any liquidity problems to result from this condition . u.s . financial markets and many of the largest u.s . financial institutions have recently been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . while we believe it is too early to predict what effect , if any , these developments may have , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collec- tion efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity would be minimized by our access to available lines of credit . 2008 2007 2006 .
|2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008 2007|year ended june 30 2008|
|net income|$ 104222|$ 104681|$ 89923|
|non-cash expenses|70420|56348|52788|
|change in receivables|-2913 ( 2913 )|-28853 ( 28853 )|30413|
|change in deferred revenue|5100|24576|10561|
|change in other assets and liabilities|4172|17495|-14247 ( 14247 )|
|net cash from operating activities|$ 181001|$ 174247|$ 169438|
.
Question: what was the percentage change in the cash and cash equivalents at june 30 , 2008 from 2007 .
Answer: | -0.26013 |
FINQA2373 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: reach in the united states , adding a 1400-person direct sales force , over 300000 merchants and $ 130 billion in annual payments volume . goodwill of $ 3.2 billion arising from the merger , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , potential synergies from combining our existing businesses and an assembled workforce , and is not deductible for income tax purposes . due to the timing of our merger with heartland , we are still in the process of assigning goodwill to our reporting units . during the year ended may 31 , 2016 , we incurred transaction costs in connection with the merger of $ 24.4 million , which are recorded in selling , general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income . the following reflects the preliminary estimated fair values of the identified intangible assets ( in thousands ) : .
|customer-related intangible assets|$ 977400|
|acquired technology|457000|
|trademarks and trade names|176000|
|covenants-not-to-compete|28640|
|total estimated acquired intangible assets|$ 1639040|
the preliminary estimated fair value of customer-related intangible assets was determined using the income approach , which is based on projected cash flows discounted to their present value using discount rates that consider the timing and risk of the forecasted cash flows . the discount rate used is the average estimated value of a market participant 2019s cost of capital and debt , derived using customary market metrics . other significant assumptions include terminal value margin rates , future capital expenditures and future working capital requirements . acquired technology was valued using the replacement cost method , which required us to estimate the cost to construct an asset of equivalent utility at prices available at the time of the valuation analysis , with adjustments in value for physical deterioration and functional and economic obsolescence . trademarks and trade names were valued using the relief-from-royalty approach . this method assumes that trade marks and trade names have value to the extent that their owner is relieved of the obligation to pay royalties for the benefits received from them . this method required us to estimate the future revenue for the related brands , the appropriate royalty rate and the weighted-average cost of capital . the discount rate used is the average estimated value of a market participant 2019s cost of capital and debt , derived using customary market metrics . the weighted-average estimated amortization period for the total estimated acquired intangible assets is approximately 11 years . the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period range of 7-20 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 5 years . the trademarks and trade names have an estimated amortization period of 7 years . covenants-not-to-compete have an estimated amortization period range of 1-4 years . heartland 2019s revenues and operating income represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) and less than 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) of our total consolidated revenues and operating income , respectively , for the year ended may 31 , 2016 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of our operations for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and may 31 , 2015 as if our merger with heartland had occurred on june 1 , 2014 . the unaudited pro forma information reflects the effects of applying our accounting policies and certain pro forma adjustments to the combined historical financial information of global payments and heartland . the pro forma adjustments include incremental amortization and depreciation expense , incremental interest expense associated with new long-term debt , a reduction of revenues and operating expenses associated with fair value adjustments made in applying the acquisition-method of accounting and the elimination of nonrecurring transaction costs directly related to the merger . global payments inc . | 2016 form 10-k annual report 2013 67 .
Question: what is the yearly amortization expense related to trademarks and trade names?
Answer: | 25142.85714 |
FINQA2374 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2016 , we had total outstanding indebtedness of $ 18.7 billion , with a current portion of $ 238.8 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we generated sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our capital expenditures and debt service obligations , as well as our required distributions . we believe the cash generated by operating activities during the year ending december 31 , 2017 will be sufficient to fund our required distributions , capital expenditures , debt service obligations ( interest and principal repayments ) and signed acquisitions . as of december 31 , 2016 , we had $ 423.0 million of cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 183.9 million was held by our joint ventures . while certain subsidiaries may pay us interest or principal on intercompany debt , it has not been our practice to repatriate earnings from our foreign subsidiaries primarily due to our ongoing expansion efforts and related capital needs . however , in the event that we do repatriate any funds , we may be required to accrue and pay taxes . cash flows from operating activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , cash provided by operating activities increased $ 520.6 million as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the primary factors that impacted cash provided by operating activities as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2015 , include : 2022 an increase in our operating profit of $ 490.8 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 67.1 million in cash paid for interest ; and 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 60.8 million in cash paid for taxes . for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , cash provided by operating activities increased $ 48.5 million as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2014 . the primary factors that impacted cash provided by operating activities as compared to the year ended december 31 , 2014 , include : 2022 an increase in our operating profit of $ 433.3 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 87.8 million in cash paid for taxes , driven primarily by the mipt one-time cash tax charge of $ 93.0 million ; 2022 a decrease in capital contributions , tenant settlements and other prepayments of approximately $ 99.0 million ; 2022 an increase of approximately $ 29.9 million in cash paid for interest ; 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 34.9 million in termination and decommissioning fees ; 2022 a decrease of approximately $ 49.0 million in tenant receipts due to timing ; and 2022 a decrease due to the non-recurrence of a 2014 value added tax refund of approximately $ 60.3 million . cash flows from investing activities our significant investing activities during the year ended december 31 , 2016 are highlighted below : 2022 we spent approximately $ 1.1 billion for the viom acquisition . 2022 we spent $ 701.4 million for capital expenditures , as follows ( in millions ) : .
|discretionary capital projects ( 1 )|$ 149.7|
|ground lease purchases|153.3|
|capital improvements and corporate expenditures ( 2 )|126.7|
|redevelopment|147.4|
|start-up capital projects|124.3|
|total capital expenditures|$ 701.4|
_______________ ( 1 ) includes the construction of 1869 communications sites globally . ( 2 ) includes $ 18.9 million of capital lease payments included in repayments of notes payable , credit facilities , term loan , senior notes and capital leases in the cash flow from financing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows . our significant investing transactions in 2015 included the following : 2022 we spent $ 5.059 billion for the verizon transaction . 2022 we spent $ 796.9 million for the acquisition of 5483 communications sites from tim in brazil . 2022 we spent $ 1.1 billion for the acquisition of 4716 communications sites from certain of airtel 2019s subsidiaries in nigeria. .
Question: what portion of the total capital expenditures is related to redevelopment?
Answer: | 0.21015 |
FINQA2375 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis sources of capital entergy mississippi's sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt or preferred stock issuances ; and bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy mississippi may refinance or redeem debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy mississippi has two separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 50 million and renewed both facilities through may 2009 . borrowings under the credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in entergy mississippi's accounts receivable . no borrowings were outstanding under either credit facility as of december 31 , 2008 . entergy mississippi has obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 175 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi's short-term borrowing limits . entergy mississippi has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long-term authorization extends through june 30 , 2009 . entergy mississippi's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .
|2008|2007|2006|2005|
|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|( in thousands )|
|( $ 66044 )|$ 20997|$ 39573|( $ 84066 )|
in may 2007 , $ 6.6 million of entergy mississippi's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . formula rate plan in march 2008 , entergy mississippi made its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the mpsc . the filing showed that a $ 10.1 million increase in annual electric revenues is warranted . in june 2008 , entergy mississippi reached a settlement with the mississippi public utilities staff that would result in a $ 3.8 million rate increase . in january 2009 the mpsc rejected the settlement and left the current rates in effect . entergy mississippi appealed the mpsc's decision to the mississippi supreme court. .
Question: what is the percent change in energy mississippi's receivables between 2006 and 2007?
Answer: | -18576.0 |
FINQA2376 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) .
|year|weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )|royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )|globalcruiseguests ( 1 )|north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )|european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )|asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )|
|2012|425000|98650|20813|11641|6225|1474|
|2013|432000|98750|21343|11710|6430|2045|
|2014|448000|105750|22039|12269|6387|2382|
|2015|469000|112700|23000|12004|6587|3129|
|2016|493000|123270|24000|12581|6542|3636|
_______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the percentage increase of the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally fom 2012 to 2016
Answer: | 0.16 |
FINQA2377 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors 201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served . our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations , and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m 201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared to 2013 and 2012 include: .
||2014|2013|2012|
|income from continuing operations|$ 2.39|$ 2.07|$ 2.10|
|income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax|$ -0.04 ( 0.04 )|$ -0.01 ( 0.01 )|$ -0.09 ( 0.09 )|
|diluted earnings per share|$ 2.35|$ 2.06|$ 2.01|
continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer . earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased 10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .
Question: by how much did diluted earnings per share increase from 2012 to 2014?
Answer: | 0.16915 |
FINQA2378 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: off-balance-sheet arrangements we have a number of off-balance-sheet investments , including joint ven- tures and debt and preferred equity investments . these investments all have varying ownership structures . substantially all of our joint venture arrangements are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we have the ability to exercise significant influence , but not control over the operating and financial decisions of these joint venture arrange- ments . our off-balance-sheet arrangements are discussed in note a0 5 , 201cdebt and preferred equity investments 201d and note a0 6 , 201cinvestments in unconsolidated joint ventures 201d in the accompanying consolidated finan- cial statements . additional information about the debt of our unconsoli- dated joint ventures is included in 201ccontractual obligations 201d below . capital expenditures we estimate that , for the year ending december a031 , 2011 , we will incur approximately $ 120.5 a0 million of capital expenditures , which are net of loan reserves ( including tenant improvements and leasing commis- sions ) , on existing wholly-owned properties , and that our share of capital expenditures at our joint venture properties , net of loan reserves , will be approximately $ 23.4 a0million . we expect to fund these capital expen- ditures with operating cash flow , additional property level mortgage financings and cash on hand . future property acquisitions may require substantial capital investments for refurbishment and leasing costs . we expect that these financing requirements will be met in a similar fashion . we believe that we will have sufficient resources to satisfy our capital needs during the next 12-month period . thereafter , we expect our capital needs will be met through a combination of cash on hand , net cash provided by operations , borrowings , potential asset sales or addi- tional equity or debt issuances . above provides that , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we will not during any four consecu- tive fiscal quarters make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests in an aggregate amount in excess of 95% ( 95 % ) of funds from operations for such period , subject to certain other adjustments . as of december a0 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we were in compliance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2010 and 2009 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and $ 15.2 a0million and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 6.7 a0million and $ 6.4 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a deriva- tive 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.1 a0billion of our long-term debt bore interest at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2010 ranged from libor plus 75 basis points to libor plus 400 basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2007 unsecured revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as-of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2010 , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2011|2012|2013|2014|2015|thereafter|total|
|property mortgages|$ 246615|$ 143646|$ 656863|$ 208025|$ 260433|$ 1884885|$ 3400467|
|revolving credit facility|2014|650000|2014|2014|2014|2014|650000|
|trust preferred securities|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|100000|100000|
|senior unsecured notes|84823|123171|2014|98578|657|793316|1100545|
|capital lease|1555|1555|1555|1555|1593|44056|51869|
|ground leases|28929|28179|28179|28179|28179|552421|694066|
|estimated interest expense|265242|245545|221161|197128|177565|355143|1461784|
|joint venture debt|207738|61491|41415|339184|96786|857305|1603919|
|total|$ 834902|$ 1253587|$ 949173|$ 872649|$ 565213|$ 4587126|$ 9062650|
48 sl green realty corp . 2010 annual report management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations .
Question: in 2011 what was the percent of the total contractual obligations associated with property mortgages
Answer: | 0.29538 |
FINQA2379 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships and rabbi trusts . limited partnerships are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .
|( dollars in thousands )|years ended december 31 , 2014|years ended december 31 , 2013|
|reinsurance receivables and premium receivables|$ 29497|$ 29905|
.
Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: | -408.0 |
FINQA2380 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2013 ( in mmboe ) . .
||u.s .|canada|total|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012|407|433|840|
|extensions and discoveries|57|38|95|
|revisions due to prices|1|-10 ( 10 )|-9 ( 9 )|
|revisions other than price|-91 ( 91 )|13|-78 ( 78 )|
|conversion to proved developed reserves|-116 ( 116 )|-31 ( 31 )|-147 ( 147 )|
|proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013|258|443|701|
at december 31 , 2013 , devon had 701 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 17 percent decrease as compared to 2012 and represents 24 percent of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 95 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 147 mmboe , or 18 percent , of the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.9 billion for 2013 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 78 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas in the cana-woodford shale in western oklahoma , carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2013 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 441 mmboe and 429 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 2013 reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions , with the largest revisions being made in the cana-woodford shale , barnett shale and carthage .
Question: what percentage decrease was there from the 2012 proved undeveloped reserves to 2013 proved undeveloped reserves?
Answer: | 36.60934 |
FINQA2381 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2018 proved reserves decreased by 168 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 84 mmboe including an increase of 108 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s . resource plays into the 5-year plan and an increase of 15 mmboe associated with wells to sales that were additions to the plan , partially offset by a decrease of 39 mmboe due to technical revisions across the business . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 102 mmboe primarily in the u.s . resource plays due to an increase of 69 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and an increase of 33 mmboe associated with wells to sales from unproved categories . 2022 production : decreased by 153 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 201 mmboe including 196 mmboe associated with the sale of our subsidiary in libya , 4 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in new mexico and michigan , and 1 mmboe associated with the sale of the sarsang block in kurdistan . 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma . 2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico . 2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions . 2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s . resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s . technical revisions . 2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma . 2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma . 2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe . 2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2018 , 529 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 17 mmboe from december 31 , 2017 . the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2018 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|546|
|revisions of previous estimates|47|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|61|
|dispositions|-19 ( 19 )|
|transfers to proved developed|-106 ( 106 )|
|end of year|529|
.
Question: what percent of increases in extensions , discoveries , and other additions was associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma?
Answer: | 0.83621 |
FINQA2382 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 1 2014summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) present value is accreted over the life of the related lease as an operating expense . all of the company 2019s existing asset retirement obligations are associated with commitments to return property subject to operating leases to original condition upon lease termination . the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s asset retirement liabilities for fiscal 2006 and 2005 ( in millions ) : .
|asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004|$ 8.2|
|additional asset retirement obligations recognized|2.8|
|accretion recognized|0.7|
|asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005|$ 11.7|
|additional asset retirement obligations recognized|2.5|
|accretion recognized|0.5|
|asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006|$ 14.7|
long-lived assets including goodwill and other acquired intangible assets the company reviews property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles , excluding goodwill , for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of . long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate . if property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value . for the three fiscal years ended september 30 , 2006 , the company had no material impairment of its long-lived assets , except for the impairment of certain assets in connection with the restructuring actions described in note 6 of these notes to consolidated financial statements . sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized but rather be tested for impairment at least annually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may be impaired . the company performs its goodwill impairment tests on or about august 30 of each year . the company did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in 2006 , 2005 , or 2004 . the company established reporting units based on its current reporting structure . for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment , goodwill has been allocated to these reporting units to the extent it relates to each reporting sfas no . 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . the company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years . foreign currency translation the company translates the assets and liabilities of its international non-u.s . functional currency subsidiaries into u.s . dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period . revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period . gains and losses from these translations are credited or charged to foreign currency translation .
Question: what was the net change in millions in asset retirement liability between september 2005 and september 2004?
Answer: | 3.5 |
FINQA2383 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 36 duke realty corporation annual report 2013 leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure ( in thousands ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|second generation tenant improvements|$ 39892|$ 26643|$ 50079|
|second generation leasing costs|38617|31059|38130|
|building improvements|13289|6182|11055|
|total second generation capital expenditures|$ 91798|$ 63884|$ 99264|
|development of real estate investments|$ 427355|$ 264755|$ 162070|
|other deferred leasing costs|$ 35376|$ 27772|$ 26311|
second generation tenant improvements and leasing costs increased due to a shift in industrial leasing volume from renewal leases to second generation leases ( see data in the key performance indicators section of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ) , which are generally more capital intensive . additionally , although the overall renewal volume was lower , renewals for office leases , which are generally more capital intensive than industrial leases , increased from 2012 . during 2013 , we increased our investment across all product types in non-tenant specific building improvements . the increase in capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments was the result of our increased focus on wholly owned development projects . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of $ 572.6 million at december 31 , 2013 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 468.8 million and $ 124.2 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . cash outflows for real estate development investments were $ 427.4 million , $ 264.8 million and $ 162.1 million for december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 31.3 million , $ 30.4 million and $ 25.3 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 27.1 million , $ 20.0 million and $ 10.4 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including construction , development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 35.7% ( 35.7 % ) , 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found herein , in the discussion of general and administrative expenses in the comparison sections of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the second generation tenant improvements from 2012 to 2013
Answer: | 0.49728 |
FINQA2384 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .
|date|pmi|pmi peer group ( 1 )|s&p 500 index|
|december 31 2012|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|december 31 2013|$ 108.50|$ 122.80|$ 132.40|
|december 31 2014|$ 106.20|$ 132.50|$ 150.50|
|december 31 2015|$ 120.40|$ 143.50|$ 152.60|
|december 31 2016|$ 130.80|$ 145.60|$ 170.80|
|december 31 2017|$ 156.80|$ 172.70|$ 208.10|
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Answer: | 0.568 |
FINQA2385 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
|company index|november 17 2011|december 31 2011|december 31 2012|december 31 2013|december 31 2014|december 31 2015|
|delphi automotive plc ( 1 )|$ 100.00|$ 100.98|$ 179.33|$ 285.81|$ 350.82|$ 418.67|
|s&p 500 ( 2 )|100.00|100.80|116.93|154.80|175.99|178.43|
|automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )|100.00|89.62|109.96|166.26|176.25|171.91|
dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .
Question: what is the difference in total return on delphi automotive plc and the automotive supplier peer group for the five year period ending december 31 2015?
Answer: | 2.4676 |
FINQA2386 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: pension expense .
||2019|2018|
|pension expense including special items noted below|$ 27.6|$ 91.8|
|settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( "special items" )|7.2|48.9|
|weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost|3.4% ( 3.4 % )|3.2% ( 3.2 % )|
|weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost|3.4% ( 3.4 % )|2.9% ( 2.9 % )|
|weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets|6.4% ( 6.4 % )|6.9% ( 6.9 % )|
|weighted average expected rate of compensation increase|3.5% ( 3.5 % )|3.5% ( 3.5 % )|
pension expense decreased from the prior year due to lower pension settlements , lower loss amortization , primarily from favorable asset experience and the impact of higher discount rates , partially offset by lower expected returns on assets . special items ( settlements , termination benefits , and curtailments ) decreased from the prior year primarily due to lower pension settlement losses . in fiscal year 2019 , special items of $ 7.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , of which $ 5.0 was recorded during the second quarter and related to the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .8 of termination benefits . these amounts are reflected within "other non- operating income ( expense ) , net" on the consolidated income statements . in fiscal year 2018 , special items of $ 48.9 included a pension settlement loss of $ 43.7 primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans to an insurer during the fourth quarter , $ 4.8 of pension settlement losses related to lump sum payouts from the u.s . supplementary pension plan , and $ .4 of termination benefits . u.k . lloyds equalization ruling on 26 october 2018 , the united kingdom high court issued a ruling related to the equalization of pension plan participants 2019 benefits for the gender effects of guaranteed minimum pensions . as a result of this ruling , we estimated the impact of retroactively increasing benefits in our u.k . plan in accordance with the high court ruling . we treated the additional benefits as a prior service cost , which resulted in an increase to our projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 4.7 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 . we are amortizing this cost over the average remaining life expectancy of the u.k . participants . 2020 outlook in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to be approximately $ 5 to $ 20 , which includes expected pension settlement losses of $ 5 to $ 10 , depending on the timing of retirements . the expected range reflects lower expected interest cost and higher total assets , partially offset by higher expected loss amortization primarily due to the impact of lower discount rates . in fiscal year 2020 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 105 for amortization of actuarial losses . in fiscal year 2019 , pension expense included amortization of actuarial losses of $ 76.2 . net actuarial losses of $ 424.4 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in fiscal year 2019 . actuarial ( gains ) losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial ( gains ) losses and resulting amortization in years beyond fiscal year 2020 . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third-party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2019 and 2018 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 40.2 and $ 68.3 , respectively . for fiscal year 2020 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 30 to $ 40 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon the timing of retirements . actual future contributions will depend on future funding legislation , discount rates , investment performance , plan design , and various other factors . refer to the contractual obligations discussion on page 37 for a projection of future contributions. .
Question: what is the expected increase in the pension expense's amortization of actuarial losses in 2020 , in comparison with 2019?
Answer: | 0.37795 |
FINQA2387 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during fiscal 2013 , we entered into an asr with a financial institution to repurchase an aggregate of $ 125 million of our common stock . in exchange for an up-front payment of $ 125 million , the financial institution committed to deliver a number of shares during the asr 2019s purchase period , which ended on march 30 , 2013 . the total number of shares delivered under this asr was 2.5 million at an average price of $ 49.13 per share . during fiscal 2013 , in addition to shares repurchased under the asr , we repurchased and retired 1.1 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 50.3 million , or an average of $ 44.55 per share , including commissions . note 10 2014share-based awards and options non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been granted to officers , key employees and directors under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan ( the 201c2005 plan 201d ) , the amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector stock option plan 201d ) , and the global payments inc . 2011 incentive plan ( the 201c2011 plan 201d ) ( collectively , the 201cplans 201d ) . there were no further grants made under the 2000 plan after the 2005 plan was effective , and the director stock option plan expired by its terms on february 1 , 2011 . there will be no future grants under the 2000 plan , the 2005 plan or the director stock option the 2011 plan permits grants of equity to employees , officers , directors and consultants . a total of 7.0 million shares of our common stock was reserved and made available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2011 plan . the following table summarizes share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for stock options , restricted stock , performance units , tsr units , and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan ( each as described below ) . 2015 2014 2013 ( in millions ) .
||2015|2014 ( in millions )|2013|
|share-based compensation expense|$ 21.1|$ 29.8|$ 18.4|
|income tax benefit|$ -6.9 ( 6.9 )|$ -7.1 ( 7.1 )|$ -5.6 ( 5.6 )|
we grant various share-based awards pursuant to the plans under what we refer to as our 201clong-term incentive plan . 201d the awards are held in escrow and released upon the grantee 2019s satisfaction of conditions of the award certificate . restricted stock and restricted stock units we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units . restricted stock awards vest over a period of time , provided , however , that if the grantee is not employed by us on the vesting date , the shares are forfeited . restricted shares cannot be sold or transferred until they have vested . restricted stock granted before fiscal 2015 vests in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . restricted stock granted during fiscal 2015 will either vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date or cliff vest at the end of a three-year service period . the grant date fair value of restricted stock , which is based on the quoted market value of our common stock at the closing of the award date , is recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period . performance units certain of our executives have been granted up to three types of performance units under our long-term incentive plan . performance units are performance-based restricted stock units that , after a performance period , convert into common shares , which may be restricted . the number of shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the performance period . the target number of performance units and any market-based performance measures ( 201cat threshold , 201d 201ctarget , 201d and 201cmaximum 201d ) are set by the compensation committee of our board of directors . performance units are converted only after the compensation committee certifies performance based on pre-established goals . 80 2013 global payments inc . | 2015 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what was the total income tax benefit that came from buying back their common stock from 2013 to 2015?
Answer: | 19.6 |
FINQA2388 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 .
|company/index|january 3 2009|january 2 2010|january 1 2011|december 31 2011|december 29 2012|december 28 2013|
|advance auto parts|$ 100.00|$ 119.28|$ 195.80|$ 206.86|$ 213.14|$ 327.63|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|119.67|134.97|134.96|150.51|197.62|
|s&p retail index|100.00|141.28|174.70|179.79|219.77|321.02|
.
Question: what is the total return for every dollar invested in s&p500 index in january 2009 and sold in january 2011?
Answer: | 0.3497 |
FINQA2389 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 6.60 billion , 4% ( 4 % ) lower than 2016 , primarily due to lower commissions and fees , reflecting a decline in our listed cash equity volumes in the u.s . market volumes in the u.s . also declined . in addition , net revenues in equities client execution were lower , reflecting lower net revenues in derivatives , partially offset by higher net revenues in cash products . net revenues in securities services were essentially unchanged . operating expenses were $ 9.69 billion for 2017 , essentially unchanged compared with 2016 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting lower net revenues , largely offset by increased technology expenses , reflecting higher expenses related to cloud-based services and software depreciation , and increased consulting costs . pre-tax earnings were $ 2.21 billion in 2017 , 54% ( 54 % ) lower than 2016 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured loans through our digital platform , marcus : by goldman sachs and secured loans through our digital platform , goldman sachs private bank select . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2018|year ended december 2017|year ended december 2016|
|equity securities|$ 4455|$ 4578|$ 2573|
|debt securities and loans|3795|2660|1689|
|total net revenues|8250|7238|4262|
|provision for credit losses|674|657|182|
|operating expenses|3365|2796|2386|
|pre-taxearnings|$ 4211|$ 3785|$ 1694|
operating environment . during 2018 , our investments in private equities benefited from company-specific events , including sales , and strong corporate performance , while investments in public equities reflected losses , as global equity prices generally decreased . results for our investments in debt securities and loans reflected continued growth in loans receivables , resulting in higher net interest income . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or the origination of loans , or if global equity prices continue to decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . 2018 versus 2017 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 8.25 billion for 2018 , 14% ( 14 % ) higher than 2017 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.46 billion , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2017 , reflecting net losses from investments in public equities ( 2018 included $ 183 million of net losses ) compared with net gains in the prior year , partially offset by significantly higher net gains from investments in private equities ( 2018 included $ 4.64 billion of net gains ) , driven by company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . for 2018 , 60% ( 60 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 40% ( 40 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 3.80 billion , 43% ( 43 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily driven by significantly higher net interest income . 2018 included net interest income of approximately $ 2.70 billion compared with approximately $ 1.80 billion in 2017 . provision for credit losses was $ 674 million for 2018 , compared with $ 657 million for 2017 , as the higher provision for credit losses primarily related to consumer loan growth in 2018 was partially offset by an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured loan in 2017 . operating expenses were $ 3.37 billion for 2018 , 20% ( 20 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to increased expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform , and increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.21 billion in 2018 , 11% ( 11 % ) higher than 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.24 billion for 2017 , 70% ( 70 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities ( 2017 included $ 3.82 billion of net gains ) , which were positively impacted by company-specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities ( 2017 included $ 762 million of net gains ) were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . for 2017 , 64% ( 64 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 36% ( 36 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.66 billion , 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . 60 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what is the growth rate in total net revenue in 2018?
Answer: | 0.13982 |
FINQA2390 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .
||number of shares|weightedaveragegrant datefair value|
|outstanding at december 31 2016|1820578|$ 98|
|granted|650942|129|
|vested|-510590 ( 510590 )|87|
|cancelled|-401699 ( 401699 )|95|
|outstanding at december 31 2017|1559231|116|
the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what was the sum of the shares purchase discount from 2015 to 2017 in millions
Answer: | 0.7 |
FINQA2391 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: .
||2016|2015|2014|
|expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )|4.35|4.55|4.80|
|risk-free rate of return ( 2 )|1.5% ( 1.5 % )|1.5% ( 1.5 % )|1.3% ( 1.3 % )|
|expected volatility ( 3 )|21.7% ( 21.7 % )|22.0% ( 22.0 % )|25.2% ( 25.2 % )|
|expected dividend yield ( 4 )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|
|fair value per option granted|$ 15.01|$ 12.04|$ 11.03|
( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: based on the tax benefit related to the share-based compensation cost , what is the effective tax rate in 2016?
Answer: | 0.29384 |
FINQA2392 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: will no longer be significant contributors to business operating results , while expenses should also decline significantly reflecting the reduced level of operations . operating earnings will primarily consist of retail forestland and real estate sales of remaining acreage . specialty businesses and other the specialty businesses and other segment includes the results of the arizona chemical business and certain divested businesses whose results are included in this segment for periods prior to their sale or closure . this segment 2019s 2006 net sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) from 2005 , but declined 17% ( 17 % ) from 2004 . operating profits in 2006 were up substantially from both 2005 and 2004 . the decline in sales compared with 2004 principally reflects declining contributions from businesses sold or closed . specialty businesses and other in millions 2006 2005 2004 .
|in millions|2006|2005|2004|
|sales|$ 935|$ 915|$ 1120|
|operating profit|$ 61|$ 4|$ 38|
arizona chemical sales were $ 769 million in 2006 , compared with $ 692 million in 2005 and $ 672 million in 2004 . sales volumes declined in 2006 compared with 2005 , but average sales price realiza- tions in 2006 were higher in both the united states and europe . operating earnings in 2006 were sig- nificantly higher than in 2005 and more than 49% ( 49 % ) higher than in 2004 . the increase over 2005 reflects the impact of the higher average sales price realiza- tions and lower manufacturing costs , partially offset by higher prices for crude tall oil ( cto ) . earnings for 2005 also included a $ 13 million charge related to a plant shutdown in norway . other businesses in this operating segment include operations that have been sold , closed or held for sale , primarily the polyrey business in france and , in prior years , the european distribution business . sales for these businesses were approximately $ 166 million in 2006 , compared with $ 223 million in 2005 and $ 448 million in 2004 . in december 2006 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell the arizona chemical business , expected to close in the first quarter of liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operat- ing cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy and raw material costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our strong focus on cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . as part of the continuing focus on improving our return on investment , we have focused our capital spending on improving our key paper and packaging businesses both globally and in north america . spending levels have been kept below the level of depreciation and amortization charges for each of the last three years , and we anticipate spending will again be slightly below depreciation and amor- tization in 2007 . financing activities in 2006 have been focused on the transformation plan objective of strengthening the balance sheet through repayment of debt , resulting in a net reduction in 2006 of $ 5.2 billion following a $ 1.7 billion net reduction in 2005 . additionally , we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary cash contribution to our u.s . qualified pension plan in december 2006 to begin satisfying projected long-term funding requirements and to lower future pension expense . our liquidity position continues to be strong , with approximately $ 3.0 billion of committed liquidity to cover future short-term cash flow requirements not met by operating cash flows . management believes it is important for interna- tional paper to maintain an investment-grade credit rating to facilitate access to capital markets on favorable terms . at december 31 , 2006 , the com- pany held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) from standard & poor 2019s and moody 2019s investor services , respectively . cash provided by operations cash provided by continuing operations totaled $ 1.0 billion for 2006 , compared with $ 1.2 billion for 2005 and $ 1.7 billion in 2004 . the 2006 amount is net of a $ 1.0 billion voluntary cash pension plan contribution made in the fourth quarter of 2006 . the major components of cash provided by continuing oper- ations are earnings from continuing operations .
Question: in 2006 what percentage of specialty businesses sales are from arizona chemical sales?
Answer: | 0.82246 |
FINQA2393 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .
||number of shares|weightedaveragegrant datefair value|
|outstanding at december 31 2016|1820578|$ 98|
|granted|650942|129|
|vested|-510590 ( 510590 )|87|
|cancelled|-401699 ( 401699 )|95|
|outstanding at december 31 2017|1559231|116|
the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: based on the review of the restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 what was the percentage change on the outstanding stock
Answer: | -0.14355 |
FINQA2394 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 3 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . this business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation . in the third quarter of 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . the sale proceeds included 20ac110 million ( $ 144 ) that was contingent on the outcome of certain retender arrangements . these proceeds were reflected in payables and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of 30 september 2013 . based on the outcome of the retenders , we were contractually required to return proceeds to the linde group . in the fourth quarter of 2014 , we made a payment to settle this liability and recognized a gain of $ 1.5 . during the third quarter of 2012 , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) was recorded to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of the homecare business for a36.1 million ( $ 9.8 ) and recorded a gain on sale of $ 2.4 . we entered into an operations guarantee related to the obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . refer to note 16 , commitments and contingencies , for additional information . the results of discontinued operations are summarized below: .
||2014|2013|2012|
|sales|$ 8.5|$ 52.3|$ 258.0|
|income before taxes|$ .7|$ 3.8|$ 68.1|
|income tax provision|2014|.2|20.8|
|income from operations of discontinued operations|.7|3.6|47.3|
|gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax|3.9|-13.6 ( 13.6 )|120.8|
|income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax|$ 4.6|$ -10.0 ( 10.0 )|$ 168.1|
the assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations for the homecare business at 30 september 2013 consisted of $ 2.5 in trade receivables , net , and $ 2.4 in payables and accrued liabilities . as of 30 september 2014 , no assets or liabilities were classified as discontinued operations. .
Question: what was the decrease observed in the sales during 2013 and 2014?
Answer: | -0.83748 |
FINQA2395 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . the table below presents market risk for positions that are not included in var . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories and therefore have not been aggregated . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2012 2011 .
|asset categories|asset categories||
|in millions|2012|2011|
|icbc|$ 208|$ 212|
|equity ( excluding icbc ) 1|2263|2458|
|debt2|1676|1521|
equity ( excluding icbc ) 1 2263 2458 debt 2 1676 1521 1 . relates to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in firm-sponsored hedge funds . 2 . primarily relates to interests in our firm-sponsored funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments . also includes loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a $ 3 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a $ 7 million gain ( including hedges ) as of december 2012 . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . the firm engages in insurance activities where we reinsure and purchase portfolios of insurance risk and pension liabilities . the risks associated with these activities include , but are not limited to : equity price , interest rate , reinvestment and mortality risk . the firm mitigates risks associated with insurance activities through the use of reinsurance and hedging . certain of the assets associated with the firm 2019s insurance activities are included in var . in addition to the positions included in var , we held $ 9.07 billion of securities accounted for as available-for- sale as of december 2012 , which support the firm 2019s reinsurance business . as of december 2012 , our available- for-sale securities primarily consisted of $ 3.63 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 4% ( 4 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 3.38 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 6% ( 6 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 856 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years . as of december 2012 , such assets were classified as held for sale and were included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about assets held for sale . as of december 2011 , we held $ 4.86 billion of securities accounted for as available-for-sale , primarily consisting of $ 1.81 billion of corporate debt securities with an average yield of 5% ( 5 % ) , the majority of which will mature after five years , $ 1.42 billion of mortgage and other asset-backed loans and securities with an average yield of 10% ( 10 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years , and $ 662 million of u.s . government and federal agency obligations with an average yield of 3% ( 3 % ) , the majority of which will mature after ten years . in addition , as of december 2012 and december 2011 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments . as of december 2012 , the firm also had $ 6.50 billion of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 62 million of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . additionally , we make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in 201cother assets 201d in the consolidated statements of financial condition . direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation . see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information on 201cother assets . 201d goldman sachs 2012 annual report 93 .
Question: for asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amounts in millions for 2012 2011\\nwhat was the minimum icbc amount?
Answer: | 208.0 |
FINQA2396 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a summary of our floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2010 : ( square feet in millions ) owned leased government- owned total .
|( square feet in millions )|owned|leased|government-owned|total|
|aeronautics|5.2|3.7|15.2|24.1|
|electronic systems|10.3|11.5|7.1|28.9|
|information systems & global solutions|2.6|7.9|2014|10.5|
|space systems|8.6|1.6|.9|11.1|
|corporate activities|2.9|.8|2014|3.7|
|total|29.6|25.5|23.2|78.3|
some of our owned properties , primarily classified under corporate activities , are leased to third parties . in the area of manufacturing , most of the operations are of a job-order nature , rather than an assembly line process , and productive equipment has multiple uses for multiple products . management believes that all of our major physical facilities are in good condition and are adequate for their intended use . item 3 . legal proceedings we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole , notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular quarter . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the proceedings summarized in note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments , and contingencies beginning on page 78 of this form 10-k . from time-to-time , agencies of the u.s . government investigate whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements . u.s . government investigations of us , whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons , could result in administrative , civil , or criminal liabilities , including repayments , fines , or penalties being imposed upon us , or could lead to suspension or debarment from future u.s . government contracting . u.s . government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us . we are subject to federal and state requirements for protection of the environment , including those for discharge of hazardous materials and remediation of contaminated sites . as a result , we are a party to or have our property subject to various lawsuits or proceedings involving environmental protection matters . due in part to their complexity and pervasiveness , such requirements have resulted in us being involved with related legal proceedings , claims , and remediation obligations . the extent of our financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this time . for information regarding these matters , including current estimates of the amounts that we believe are required for remediation or clean-up to the extent estimable , see 201ccritical accounting policies 2013 environmental matters 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations beginning on page 45 , and note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments , and contingencies beginning on page 78 of this form 10-k . item 4 . ( removed and reserved ) item 4 ( a ) . executive officers of the registrant our executive officers are listed below , as well as information concerning their age at december 31 , 2010 , positions and offices held with the corporation , and principal occupation and business experience over the past five years . there were no family relationships among any of our executive officers and directors . all officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors . linda r . gooden ( 57 ) , executive vice president 2013 information systems & global solutions ms . gooden has served as executive vice president 2013 information systems & global solutions since january 2007 . she previously served as deputy executive vice president 2013 information & technology services from october 2006 to december 2006 , and president , lockheed martin information technology from september 1997 to december 2006 . christopher j . gregoire ( 42 ) , vice president and controller ( chief accounting officer ) mr . gregoire has served as vice president and controller ( chief accounting officer ) since march 2010 . he previously was employed by sprint nextel corporation from august 2006 to may 2009 , most recently as principal accounting officer and assistant controller , and was a partner at deloitte & touche llp from september 2003 to july 2006. .
Question: what percentage of total floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2010 is owned?
Answer: | 0.37803 |
FINQA2397 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2016 non-qualified deferred compensation as of december 31 , 2016 , mr . may had a deferred account balance under a frozen defined contribution restoration plan . the amount is deemed invested , as chosen by the participant , in certain t . rowe price investment funds that are also available to the participant under the savings plan . mr . may has elected to receive the deferred account balance after he retires . the defined contribution restoration plan , until it was frozen in 2005 , credited eligible employees 2019 deferral accounts with employer contributions to the extent contributions under the qualified savings plan in which the employee participated were subject to limitations imposed by the code . defined contribution restoration plan executive contributions in registrant contributions in aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) aggregate withdrawals/ distributions aggregate balance at december 31 , ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) .
|name|executive contributions in 2016 ( b )|registrant contributions in 2016 ( c )|aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) ( d )|aggregate withdrawals/distributions ( e )|aggregate balance at december 31 2016 ( a ) ( f )|
|phillip r . may jr .|$ 2014|$ 2014|$ 177|$ 2014|$ 1751|
( 1 ) amounts in this column are not included in the summary compensation table . 2016 potential payments upon termination or change in control entergy corporation has plans and other arrangements that provide compensation to a named executive officer if his or her employment terminates under specified conditions , including following a change in control of entergy corporation . in addition , in 2006 entergy corporation entered into a retention agreement with mr . denault that provides possibility of additional service credit under the system executive retirement plan upon certain terminations of employment . there are no plans or agreements that would provide for payments to any of the named executive officers solely upon a change in control . the tables below reflect the amount of compensation each of the named executive officers would have received if his or her employment with their entergy employer had been terminated under various scenarios as of december 31 , 2016 . for purposes of these tables , a stock price of $ 73.47 was used , which was the closing market price on december 30 , 2016 , the last trading day of the year. .
Question: baaed on the table , how many shares does in the plan does mr . may have based of the closing stock price of $ 73.47 as of december 30 , 2016?
Answer: | 23.83286 |
FINQA2398 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change .
|( in millions )|2004|2003|change|
|net sales|$ 1890.1|$ 1735.5|$ 154.6|
|income before interest and taxes|$ 140.5|$ 96.9|$ 43.6|
|interest expense net|-29.6 ( 29.6 )|-121.8 ( 121.8 )|92.2|
|income ( loss ) before taxes|110.9|-24.9 ( 24.9 )|135.8|
|( provision ) benefit for income taxes|-42.2 ( 42.2 )|10.5|-52.7 ( 52.7 )|
|net income ( loss )|$ 68.7|$ -14.4 ( 14.4 )|$ 83.1|
.
Question: by what percent did net sales increase from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: | 0.08908 |
FINQA2399 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 21 . expenses during the fourth quarter of 2008 , we elected to provide support to certain investment accounts managed by ssga through the purchase of asset- and mortgage-backed securities and a cash infusion , which resulted in a charge of $ 450 million . ssga manages certain investment accounts , offered to retirement plans , that allow participants to purchase and redeem units at a constant net asset value regardless of volatility in the underlying value of the assets held by the account . the accounts enter into contractual arrangements with independent third-party financial institutions that agree to make up any shortfall in the account if all the units are redeemed at the constant net asset value . the financial institutions have the right , under certain circumstances , to terminate this guarantee with respect to future investments in the account . during 2008 , the liquidity and pricing issues in the fixed-income markets adversely affected the market value of the securities in these accounts to the point that the third-party guarantors considered terminating their financial guarantees with the accounts . although we were not statutorily or contractually obligated to do so , we elected to purchase approximately $ 2.49 billion of asset- and mortgage-backed securities from these accounts that had been identified as presenting increased risk in the current market environment and to contribute an aggregate of $ 450 million to the accounts to improve the ratio of the market value of the accounts 2019 portfolio holdings to the book value of the accounts . we have no ongoing commitment or intent to provide support to these accounts . the securities are carried in investment securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . the components of other expenses were as follows for the years ended december 31: .
|( in millions )|2008|2007|2006|
|customer indemnification obligation|$ 200|||
|securities processing|187|$ 79|$ 37|
|other|505|399|281|
|total other expenses|$ 892|$ 478|$ 318|
in september and october 2008 , lehman brothers holdings inc. , or lehman brothers , and certain of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings . while we had no unsecured financial exposure to lehman brothers or its affiliates , we indemnified certain customers in connection with these and other collateralized repurchase agreements with lehman brothers entities . in the then current market environment , the market value of the underlying collateral had declined . during the third quarter of 2008 , to the extent these declines resulted in collateral value falling below the indemnification obligation , we recorded a reserve to provide for our estimated net exposure . the reserve , which totaled $ 200 million , was based on the cost of satisfying the indemnification obligation net of the fair value of the collateral , which we purchased during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the collateral , composed of commercial real estate loans which are discussed in note 5 , is recorded in loans and leases in our consolidated statement of condition. .
Question: what portion of the total other expenses is related to customer indemnification obligation in 2008?
Answer: | 0.22422 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.